natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V tomto ohledu je tﾖeba podotknout, ™e nèrodnó opatﾖenó, kterï opakuje nebo nahrazuje, ani™ by pﾖidèvalo novï nebo doplﾏu-jócó speci«kace,existujócótechnickïpﾖedpisy,kterïbylyﾖèdnｸKomisi oznèmeny, jestli™e byly pﾖijaty potï, co vstoupila v plat-nost smｸrnice 83/189/EHS, nelze pova™ovat za ¶nèvrhƒ technic-k̅ch pﾖedpisヮ ve smyslu ｲlènku 1 odst. 12 smｸrnice 98/34/ES a v dヮsledku toho i za pﾖedmｸt oznamovacó povinnosti.
The last type of technical regulation contemplated by the directive which should be notified (in addition to technical specifications, `other requirements' and rules on services which impose de jure and de facto compulsory require-ments) consist of national laws, regulations and administra-tive provisions intended to prohibit the manufacture, im-portation, marketing and use of a product or prohibiting the provision or use of a service or the establishment as a service provider.
12) ¶Nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisuƒ znｸnó technickï speci«kacenebo jinïho po™adavku vｲetnｸ sprèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ, kterï je vypra-covèno se zèmｸrem vydat tuto speci«kacinebojivkoneｲnïm sta-diu vydat jako technick̅ pﾖedpis, kterï je ve stadiu pﾖópravy, kdy jeþtｸ mohou b̅t provedeny zèsadnó zmｸny.
To fall within this fourth category of technical regulation con-cerning a prohibition inter alia on use, the measures must have a scope which goes well beyond a limitation to certain possible uses of the product or the service in question and must not be con«nedtoamererestrictionoftheiruse.Thatcategory of technical regulation is particularly intended to cover national measures which leave no room for any use
Tato smｸrnice se nevztahuje na opatﾖenó, kterè ｲlenskï stèty pova-™ujó podle Smlouvy za nezbytnè pro ochranu osob, zejmïna pra-covnókヮ, pﾖi pou™óvènó v̅robkヮ, pokud tato opatﾖenó nemajó na v̅robky vliv.
The category of measures in question includes, in particular, those which seek to encourage the purchase of products complying with certain specifications, by granting financing facilities (for example, subsidies for the purchase of certain heating appliances complying with defined technical re-quirements) or, alternatively, to discourage their purchase (for example the exclusion of grants in the building industry when materials possessing certain characteristics are used).
Tento odstavec de«nujepojem¶nèvrhutechnickïhopﾖedpisuƒ.Aby mohl b̅t pova™ovèn za nèvrh, musó b̅t technick̅ pﾖedpis ve stadiu pﾖópravy, kdy je mo™nï v textu provèdｸt podstatnï zmｸny.
It also includes fiscal or financial measures which may affect consumption by encouraging compliance with `other re-quirements' within the meaning of the Directive (for exam-ple, exemption from ecotax for the packaging of given prod-ucts when a deposit system is set up, or exemption from ecotax for certain products when a collection and recycling system is established).
Toto ustanovenó jeþtｸ vóce posiluje pojetó ji™ vyjèdﾖenï v od-stavcóch 3 a 4 zamｸﾖenï na posti™enó technick̅ch speci«kacó,kterï majó vliv na vlastnosti v̅robku.
Similarly this category of measures concern those aiming at encouraging or discouraging the purchase of services having certain features (e.g. services re-ceived via specific devices or originating from operators es-tablished in certain areas).
Kapitola II › Postup poskytovènó informacó t̅kajócó se norem
Chapter II: The procedure for the provision of information with regard to standards
Identickï pﾖevzetó znamenè, ™e nèrodnó norma zahrnuje nebo se odvolèvè in extenso (v celïm rozsahu) na text mezinèrodnó nebo evropskï normy.
Identical transposition means that the national standard in-cludes or refers in extenso the text of the international or Euro-pean standard.
Zahrnutó in extenso evropskï normy do souhrnヮ nèrodnóch no-rem je obvykle pravidlem.
The inclusion in extenso of the European standard in sets of na-tional standards is usually the rule.
Harmonizace nèrodnóch norem se dosèhne tehdy, kdy™ v̅robky vyrèbｸnï v souladu s nèrodnómi normami jednoho ｲlenskïho stètu mohou b̅t pova™ovèny za v̅robky splﾏujócó beze zmｸny nèrodnó normy jinïho ｲlenskïho stètu.
The harmonisation of na-tional standards is achieved when products manufactured in accordance with national standards of one Member State may be considered to comply, without modi«cation,withthena-tional standards of the other Member States.
Komise a normalizaｲnó orgèny uvedenï v pﾖólohèch I a II musó b̅t informovèny o nov̅ch pﾖedmｸtech, u nich™ nèrodnó orgèny uvedenï v pﾖóloze II rozhodly jejich zaｲlenｸnóm do svïho normali-zaｲnóho programu o vypracovènó normy nebo o jejó zmｸnｸ, nejde--li o identickï nebo ekvivalentnó pﾖevzetó mezinèrodnó nebo evrop-skï normy.
The Commission and the standardisation bodies referred to in Annexes I and II shall be informed of the new subjects for which the national bodies referred to in Annex II have decided, by includ-ing them in their standards programme, to prepare or amend a standard, unless it is an identical or equivalent transposition of an international or European standard.
Postup poskytovènó informacó v oblasti norem v praxi zaｲal 1. ledna 1985.
In practice, the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardsbeganon1January1985.
Plènek 2 stanovó, ™e postup poskytovènó informacó v oblasti no-rem se omezuje jenom na novï prèce, kterï nèrodnó normali-zaｲnó orgèny plènujó zahèjit v okam™iku zaﾖazenó pﾖedmｸtu do normalizaｲnóho programu, jin̅mi slovy v dostateｲnｸ rannïm stadiu, kterï dovoluje zainteresovan̅m odvｸtvóm v rヮzn̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètech se pracó zÿｲastnit a dodat pﾖipomónky, je™ bude mo™nï vzót v ÿvahu.
Article 2 stipulates that the procedure for the provision of infor-mation in the «eldofstandardsislimitedtonewworkwhichthe national standardisation bodies are planning to initiate, at the time of its inclusion in the standards programme, in other words at a su/cientlyearlystagetoenableinterestedsectorsin the various Member States to take part and their comments to be taken into account.
S ohledem na novï normalizaｲnó iniciativy v oblastech, za nｸ™ odpovódajó CEN a CENELEC, jsou tyto dva evropskï normalizaｲ-nó orgèny odpovｸdnï za technickou strènku funkce oznamova-cóho postupu prostﾖednictvóm roｲnóch smluv uzavóran̅ch s Ko-misó a sekretariètem EFTA.
With regard to new standardisation initiatives in the areas of responsibility of CEN and CENELEC, the two European stand-ardisation bodies are responsible for the technical operation of the procedure by means of annual contracts concluded with the Commission and the EFTA Secretariat.
Tyto novï iniciativy je tﾖeba podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES oznèmit tehdy, kdy je jejich cólem vypracovat novou normu nebo po-zmｸnit existujócó normu, ale jenom v tom pﾖópadｸ, ™e zam̅þlenè norma nenó ¶identick̅m nebo ekvivalentnóm pﾖevzetóm mezi-nèrodnó nebo evropskï normy.•
These new initiatives must be communicated under Directive 98/34/EC, whether their objective is to establish a new stand-ard or amend an existing standard - but only if the envisaged standard does not arise from the `identical or equivalent' trans-position of an international or European standard.
Poｲónaje rokem 1992 Komise zaﾖazuje do tｸchto smluv dvｸ klau-zule t̅kajócó se kvality informacó, podle nich™ se CEN a CENELC zavazujó za prvï jasnｸ de«novatvnitﾖnópravidlanutnèprozajiþ-tｸnó pﾖesnosti, srozumitelnosti a spolehlivosti informaｲnóch oznèmenó a za druhï vybavit svï ÿstﾖednó sekretarièty zdroji, kte-rï jim umo™nó sledovat kvalitu obdr™en̅ch informacó.
Since 1992, the Commission has included two clauses in these contracts regarding the quality of the information, according to which CEN and CENELEC undertake, «rstly,tode«neclearlythe internal rules necessary to ensure the accuracy, clarity and reliability of the noti«cationsand,secondly,toequiptheirre-spective central secretariats with the resources necessary for monitoring the quality of the information received.
Nèrodnó normalizaｲnó orgèny informace sdｸlujó ÿstﾖednóm se-kretariètヮm evropsk̅ch orgènヮ dennｸ, sekretarièty je kontro-lujó, zpracovèvajó a uklèdajó do databèze.
The information is communicated by the national standardisa-tion bodies on a daily basis to the central secretariats of the two European bodies, where it is checked, processed and stored in a database.
V̅sledky se pak po odvｸtvóch uvèdｸjó v periodickïm katalogu (mｸsóｲnóm u CEN, ｲtvrtletnóm u CENELEC), kter̅ se distribuuje ｲlenヮm CEN a CE-NELEC a pﾖósluþn̅m odborヮm Komise (generèlnómu ﾖeditelstvó
The results are then recorded, sector by sector, in a
Dヮvod pro to je velmi jednoduch̅: pouze ¶ｲistｸƒ nèrodnó nor-my mohou pヮsobit pﾖekè™ky sprèvnïmu fungovènó vnitﾖnóho trhu.
The reason for this is simple: it is only `purely' national stand-ards that are likely to act as barriers to the proper functioning of the internal market.
Mezinèrodnó a evropskè norma by v zèsadｸ nemｸla voln̅ pohyb zbo™ó uvnitﾖ Evropskïho spoleｲenstvó ohrozit, proto™e jejó technickï speci«kacebylypﾖedmｸtemvzèjemnïshodyvmnohem þirþóm mｸﾖótku ne™ v omezenó danïm nèrodnómi hra-nicemi.
An international or European standard should not, in principle, jeopardise the free movement of goods within the European Community, since its technical speci«ca-tions have been the subject of consensus on a much larger scale than the limits of national boundaries.
pro podnikènó a prヮmysl), kterï je zkoumajó a vydèvajó pﾖópadnï pﾖipomónky.
periodical register (monthly for CEN and quarterly for CENELEC) which is distributed to the members of CEN and CENELEC, in addition to the relevant departments of the Commission (Di-rectorate-General for Enterprise and Industry) for examination and comments.
Ve zprèvｸ podle odstavce 1 se uvede zejmïna, zda danè norma
The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall indicate, in par-ticular, whether the standard concerned:
Publikace tohoto katalogu a jeho distribuce na nèrodnó ÿrovni je zèrukou transparentnosti informacó sdｸlovan̅ch postupem smｸrnice 98/34/ES.
The publication of this register and its distribution on a nation-al level, is a guarantee of the transparency of the information communicated under the 98/34/EC procedure.
̌ bude novou nèrodnó normou, nebo
› will be a new national standard, or
Podstatnï je, ™e prヮmysl a vþechny zainteresovanï strany tento nèstroj znajó a majó k informacóm pﾖóstup, aby byly schopnï vy-u™ót mo™nosti, kterï jsou jim k dispozici. Jsou to:
It is essential that industry and all interested parties know of this instrument and have access to the information in order to be able to exercise the following options open to them:
̌ bude zmｸnou nèrodnó normy.
› will amend a national standard.
̌ mo™nost komentovat novｸ vypracovèvanï normy vztahujócó se na oblast jejich ｲinnosti;
› to comment on new standards initiatives relating to their sector of activity;
̌ mo™nost po™èdat o ÿｲast na prèci pﾖósluþnïho technickïho v̅boru normalizaｲnóho orgènu v jinïm ｲlenskïm stètｸ (napﾖ. francouzskè spoleｲnost mヮ™e po™èdat o ÿｲast v nｸ-meckïm v̅boru);
› to apply to take part in the work of the relevant technical committee of a standardisation body in another Member State (for example, a French company could apply to partici-pate in the German committee).
Povinnost nèrodnóch normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ poskytovat infor-mace o povaze nov̅ch nèvrhヮ norem mè za cól zajistit transpa-rentnost a usnadnｸnó prヮzkumu oznèmenó. Vychèzó pﾖómo z pﾖedchozóho odstavce.
The obligation on the national standardisation bodies to pro-vide details of the nature of the new draft standard has the ob-jective of ensuring transparency and facilitating the examina-tion of noti«cations.Itarisesdirectlyfromtheprecedingparagraph.
Tﾖi uvedenï kategorie norem jsou ve skuteｲnosti normy, kterï neodpovódajó ¶identickïmu nebo ekvi-valentnómu pﾖevzetó mezinèrodnó normyƒ a musó b̅t v dヮsled-ku toho podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES oznamovèny.
The three categories of standards listed are in fact those which do not correspond to the `identical or equivalent transposition of an international standard' and must conse-quently be n o t i « e d u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C .
̌ mo™nost navrhnout, aby se norma vypracovèvala mósto na nèrodnó na evropskï ÿrovni.
› to suggest that the standard be prepared on a European rather than a national level.
̌ Nèvrh novï nèrodnó normy by mohl obsahovat technickï speci«kace,kterïbypﾖedstavovalypﾖekè™kuvolnïmupo-hybu zbo™ó, jestli™e se norma pou™ije jako omezenó.
This assumes that the national bodies are consulting industry by distributing the register as widely as possible, particularly through relays allowing easy access to the information.
To pﾖedpoklèdè, ™e se nèrodnó orgèny radó s prヮmyslem pomo-có pokud mo™no co nejþirþó distribuce katalogu, zvlèþtｸ pro-stﾖednictvóm pﾖenosヮ umo™ﾏujócóch snadn̅ pﾖóstup k informa-cóm.
› A new draft national standard could contain technical speci-«cationswhichmayconstituteabarriertothefreemove-ment of goods if the standard is used restrictively.
Dヮle™itï je zdヮraznit, ™e v praxi majó zainteresovanï strany, zvlèþtｸ prヮmysl, na svou reakci pouze relativnｸ krètk̅ ｲas.
This can only be ascertained by examining these speci«cationsindi-vidually.
̌ Nèrodnó norma, kterè pﾖevèdó mezinèrodnó normu (ISO nebo IEC), nemusó b̅t shodnè s pヮvodnóm dokumentem, proto™e toto pﾖevzetó nenó samo o sobｸ povinnï a nèrodnó normali-zaｲnó orgèny mohou samy za sebe rozhodnout o pﾖidènó zmｸn a doplﾏkヮ, jestli™e majó za to, ™e technickï speci«kacev pﾖevèdｸnï normｸ neodpovódajó jejich vlastnómu trhu.
It is important to emphasise that interested parties, particularly industry, in practice have only a relatively short period of time in which to react.
V ta-kovïm pﾖópadｸ je vhodnï vyhodnotit technickou speci«kaciv pﾖevèdｸnï normｸ s ohledem na tu ｲèst, kterè se od mezi-nèrodnó normy liþó.
In the case of subsequent litigation, the fact that an objection was not raised will inevitably be used against those who have not examined the register.
Pokud se t̅kè nov̅ch normalizaｲnóch pﾖedmｸtヮ v oblasti tele-komunikacó, byl ETSI zahrnut do oznamovacóho postupu od okam™iku, kdy byl uveden v seznamu v pﾖóloze I smｸrnice 98/34/ES.
As far as new standardisation subjects in the «eldoftelecom-munications is concerned, ETSI has been involved in the infor-mation procedure since it was included in Annex I to Directive 98/34/EC.
Dヮvodem je skuteｲnost, ™e
In practice, this participation is limited to the receipt
kace nebo vyjmutó ｲèsti textu) nebude mót za nèsledek novï nebezpeｲó vzniku technick̅ch pﾖekè™ek obchodu uvnitﾖ Spoleｲenstvó.
The noti«cationofthe draft then makes it possible to examine whether the amendment (addition, modi«cationorremovalofcertaintechnical speci«cations)couldintroducenewrisksoftechni-cal barriers to trade within the Community.
Aby bylo mo™nï tento po™adavek splnit, byly nèrodnó a evropskï normalizaｲnó orgèny zbaveny povinnosti oznamovat jednou za rok svï normalizaｲnó programy (prostﾖednictvóm ÿstﾖednóch sekre-tariètヮ CEN a CENELEC), jak jim to zpoｲètku uklèdala smｸrnice 83/189/ES, ale musó Komisi poskytnout vþechny tyto normalizaｲnó programy nebo jejich ｲèsti, jestli™e o nｸ Komise po™èdè.
In order to ful«lthisrequirement,thelatterarenolongerunderthe obligation, as initially provided under Directive 83/189/EEC, of notifying their standards programmes on an annual basis (through the central secretariats of CEN and CENELEC), but they must communicate all or part of these programmes if the Com-mission so requests.
Kromｸ toho mohou v prヮbｸhu tohoto prヮzkumu nèrodnó nor-malizaｲnó orgèny, evropskï normalizaｲnó orgèny a Komise na-vrhnout pﾖópravu evropskï normy, jestli™e majó za to, ™e by si zam̅þlenï zmｸny zaslou™ily zavedenó novïho pﾖedmｸtu pro prヮzkum na evropskï ÿrovni.
The Commission acts as a clearing house for forwarding this information to the Member States.
Komise slou™ó pro pﾖedèvènó tｸchto informacó ｲlensk̅m stètヮm jako referenｲnó stﾖedisko.
In the « e l d o fst a n d a r d i s a t i o n , t h e a i m o f D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C i s t o ensure the transparency of national initiatives, but it also has a role to play in encouraging the development of European standardisation.
Komise v pﾖópadｸ potﾖeby zmｸnó pﾖólohu II na zèkladｸ sdｸlenó ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
Where appropriate, the Commission shall amend Annex II on the basis of communications from the Member States.
Cólem smｸrnice 98/34/ES v oblasti normalizace je zajistit trans-parentnost nèrodnóch iniciativ, ale takï podporovat rozvoj ev-ropskï normalizace.
After consulting the Committee referred to in Article 5, the Com-mission may draw up rules for the consolidated presentation of this information and a plan and criteria governing the presenta-tion of this information in order to facilitate its evaluation.
Tento odstavec stanovó, ™e mè Komise prèvo aktualizovat se-znam nèrodnóch normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ, kter̅ je uveden v pﾖó-loze II smｸrnice.
This paragraph stipulates that the Commission has the author-ity to update the list of national standardisation bodies which appears in Annex II to the Directive.
Aktualizaci provèdｸjó ｲlenskï stèty, kterï musó Komisi poskytnout nezbytnï informace.
This updating is carried out by the Member States, which must provide the Commission with the necessary information.
Rada rozhoduje na zèkladｸ nèvrhu Komise o ka™dï zmｸnｸ pﾖó-lohy I.
The Council shall decide, on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, on any amendment to Annex I.
Pﾖesto™e bylo ﾖózenó postupu poskytovènó informacó v oblasti norem svｸﾖeno kontraktem CEN a CENELEC, Komise na jeho sprèvnï fungovènó dohló™ó sama, a to pﾖedevþóm tóm, ™e si pone-chèvè prèvo navrhnout obｸma evropsk̅m normalizaｲnóm or-gènヮm, aby pﾖijaly metodiku prezentace shromè™dｸn̅ch infor-macó s cólem zajistit jejich snadnｸjþó zpracovènó.
Although the operation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandardshasbeendelegatedbycontract to CEN and CENELEC, the Commission itself supervises its proper functioning, in particular by retaining the option of suggesting that the two European standardisation bodies adopt a methodology for the presentation of the collected in-formation, in order to ensure easier processing.
Pﾖóloha I smｸrnice byla napﾖ. zmｸnｸna v roce 1992, aby byl na seznamu evropsk̅ch normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ doplnｸn ETSI (42).
This paragraph stipulates that, unlike Annex II, the updating of Annex I, containing the list of o / c i a l l y r e c o g n i s e d E u r op e a n s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n bodies, does not come under the exclusive juris-diction of the Commission but requires a decision by the Council of Ministers on the basis of a proposal from the Commission.
Normalizaｲnóm orgènヮm uveden̅m v pﾖólohèch I a II, jako™ i Ko-misi budou na vy™èdènó zaslèny vþechny nèvrhy norem. Tyto or-
Annex I to the Directive was, for example, amended in 1992 in order to add ETSI to the list of European standardisation bodies.
42) Rozhodnutó 92/400/EHS citovanï ji™ dﾖóve.
Decision 92/400/EEC, already cited.
gèny budou prヮbｸ™nｸ informovèny dotyｲn̅m orgènem o opatﾖe-nóch, kterè byla pﾖijata na zèkladｸ jejich pﾖópadn̅ch pﾖipomónek k nèvrhヮm.
› communicate information in accordance with Articles 2 and 3,
jeho normalizaｲnó orgèn opravdu oznamoval vþechny novï pﾖedmｸty norem v dobｸ, kdy se dostèvajó do roｲnóho normali-zaｲnóho programu, dodèval jak̅koliv nèvrh normy po™adovan̅ normalizaｲnóm orgènem jinïho ｲlenskïho stètu, evropsk̅m normalizaｲnóm orgènem nebo Komisó a trvale je informoval o akcóch podniknut̅ch na zèkladｸ jakïkoliv pﾖipomónky k nèvrhu normy.
This subparagraph stipulates that each Member State must ensure, by whatever means it considers necessary, that its standardisation body does in fact notify all new subjects for standards at the time they are entered in the annual work pro-gramme, supplies any draft standard which is requested by the standardisation body of another Member State, a Europe-an standardisation body or the Commission, and keeps them informed of the action taken on any comments made on the draft standard.
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES stanovó, ™e jakmile byly nèrodnó a evropskï normalizaｲnó orgèny a Komise informovèny o pﾖópravｸ nèvrhヮ no-v̅ch norem v rヮzn̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètech, majó prèvo po™adovat od normalizaｲnóho orgènu ｲlenskïho stètu zaslènó textu jakïkoliv na-vrhovanï normy, kterè byla oznèmena. Po™èdan̅ normalizaｲnó orgèn ｲlenskïho stètu musó takovïmu po™adavku vyhovｸt.
Directive 98/34/EC stipulates that once they are informed of the preparation of new standards initiatives in the various Member States, the national standardisation bodies, European standardisation bodies and the Commission shall have the right to require the standardisation body of a Member State to send the text of any draft standard which it has noti«ed.Thelatter must comply with this request.
̌ zveﾖejﾏujó nèvrhy norem tak, aby svï pﾖipomónky k nim mohly vyjèdﾖit i strany usazenï v jin̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètech,
› publish the draft standards in such a way that comments may also be obtained from parties established in other Member States,
Kromｸ toho se rovnｸ™ vy™aduje, aby byli informovèni vþichni, kdo poslali svoje pﾖipomónky k jednomu z tｸchto nèvrhヮ, o akci podniknutï na jejich zèkladｸ: pozmｸnｸnó nèvrhu, sta™enó nèvr-hu nebo odヮvodnｸnó pro jeho ponechènó.
It is also required to inform all those who have commented on one of these drafts of the action taken: whether amendment to the draft, the withdrawal of the draft or the justi«cationforre-taining it.
Opatﾖenó, k nim™ jsou ｲlenskï stèty oprèvnｸny
Measures for which the Member States are competent
Podle tohoto pododstavce musó ka™d̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt zajistit, aby jeho normalizaｲnó orgèn poskytoval vþem stranèm v celï Unii pﾖóle™itost pﾖipomónkovat nèvrhy nèrodnóch norem. To se rovnè rozþóﾖenó veﾖejnïho prヮzkumu i na ostatnó ｲlenskï stèty, co™ je na nèrodnó ÿrovni podstatnè fèze na konci procesu nèvrhu nor-my pﾖed ovｸﾖenóm jeho platnosti a publikacó jeho koneｲnïho textu.
According to this subparagraph, each Member State must en-sure that its standardisation body provides parties throughout the Union with the opportunity of commenting on national draft standards.
Plènek 4, podobnｸ jako ｲlènek 7, stanovó ｲlensk̅m stètヮm po-vinnosti t̅kajócó se organizace postupu poskytovènó informacó v oblasti norem. Jsou to povinnosti, pokud jde o v̅sledek, niko-liv prostﾖedek, proto™e zatómco urｲitè smｸrnice musó b̅t trans-ponovèna do nèrodnóho prèva ｲlensk̅m stètem, jemu™ je urｲe-na, zpヮsob transpozice je ponechèn na volbｸ onoho ｲlenskïho stètu, pokud je zachovèn sledovan̅ cól.
Article 4 (like Article 7) sets out Member States' obligations with regard to the organisation of the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldofstandards.Itisanobligationastotheresult, not the means, because whilst a Directive must be trans-posed into internal law by the Member States to which it is ad-dressed, the choice of transposition method is left to the Mem-ber States, as long as the objective pursued is attained.
Tento v̅tisk je zcela pochopitelnｸ napsèn v pracovnóm jazyce vydèvajócóho orgènu.
This copy is obviously written in the working language of the issuing body.
Pﾖójemci jsou odpovｸd-ni za jeho pﾖeklad do svïho vlastnóho jazyka a za organizaci konzultace na svïm ÿzemó v souladu s postupem platn̅m v je-jich zemi (nèrodnó orgèn poþle nèvrh normy napﾖ. normalizaｲ-nómu odbornókovi odpovｸdnïmu za oblast, jó™ se nèvrh t̅kè, ten jej zase poþle odpovódajócómu normalizaｲnómu v̅boru, ve kterïm jsou zastoupeny vþechny zainteresovanï strany).
The recipients are responsible for having it translated into their own language and organising a consultation on their own territory, in accordance with the pro-cedures in force in the country (the draft standard is, for exam-ple, sent by the national body to the standards engineer re-sponsible for the sector concerned, who in turn passes it on to
Navóc skuteｲnost, ™e vｸtþina nèrodnóch normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ mè postavenó soukromï instituce, sni™uje mo™nost nèrodnóch orgènヮ jim nｸco naﾖizovat.
Furthermore, the fact that most of the national standardisation bodies have the status of a private institution reduces the na-tional authorities' scope to give them orders.
Proto je text smｸrnice v tïto souvis-losti velmi pru™n̅.
Hence the very ‹ e x i b l e w o r d i n g o ft h e D i r e c t i v e i n t h i s c o n t e x t .