natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Konventu takï udｸluje postavenó instituce, jako™to orgènu odpovｸdnïho za pﾖópravu revizó, ｲóm™ uznèvè skuteｲnｸ rozhodujócó ÿlohu Konventu, kterou sehrèl pﾖi navrhovènó textu àstavy, a omezenó mezivlèdnó metody.
It also places the Convention on an institutional footing as the body responsible for preparing revisions, in recognition of both the truly decisive role the Convention played in the drafting of the Constitution and the limitations of the intergovernmental method.
Parlament, kter̅ jako prvnó navrhl, aby byla pou™ita metoda svolènó Konventu, mヮ™e jen podpoﾖit tuto zmｸnu, kterè umo™nó, aby byl reviznó proces transparentnｸjþó a demokratiｲtｸjþó a aby se stal zèroveﾏ ÿｲinnｸjþóm.
Parliament, which was the « r s t t op r o po s e t h a t the C on v en t i on m e t h o d b e u s e d , cannot but welcome this change, which will help to make the revision procedure more transparent and democratic at the same time as making it more e.ective.
Jednóm ze skuteｲnｸ pozitivnóch smｸrヮ v̅voje je skuteｲnost, ™e Parlament musó dèt svヮj souhlas, pokud by se Rada rozhodla Konvent nesvolat s odヮvodnｸnóm, ™e se nejednè o dostateｲnｸ zèsadnó zmｸny.
One particularly positive development is the fact that Parliament must give its approval should the Council decide not to convene a Convention on the grounds that the changes are not su/cientlymajor.
Mezivlèdnó konference bohu™el nesplnila oｲekèvènó Parlamentu s ohledem na zjednoduþenó reviznóho postupu.
Unfortunately, the Intergovernmental Conference did not live up to Parliament's expectations as regards simplifying the revision procedure.
Text ｲlènku IV-444 obsahuje zjednoduþen̅ postup revize ustanovenó hlavy III ｲèsti III o vnitﾖnóch politikèch Unie (za podmónky, ™e tato revize nezv̅þó kompetence pﾖidｸlenï Unii), avþak tento postup pouze umo™ﾏuje Evropskï radｸ obejót svolènó Konventu (ani™ by si vy™èdala souhlas Parlamentu). Jednomyslnost a rati«kacevþemi ｲlensk̅mi stèty navóc zヮstèvajó pravidlem.
The text of Article IV-444 does contain a simpli«edprocedureforrevisingthe provisions of Title III of Part III on the internal policies of the Union (on condition that such revision does not increase the competences allocated to the Union), but this procedure merely allows the European Council to bypass the Convention method (without requiring Parliament's consent); furthermore, unanimity and r a t i « c a t i on b y a l l the M e m b e r S t a t e s r e m a in the r u l e .
Revize àstavy tak bude nadèle po™adovat jednomyslnost a rati«kacivþemi ｲlensk̅mi stèty ve vþech pﾖópadech.
Revision of the Constitution will thus continue to require unanimity and r a t i « c a t i on b y a l l the M e m b e r S t a t e s in a l l c a s e s .
Rヮznï pﾖednesenï nèvrhy, kterï se tｸþily þirokï podpoﾖe Evropskïho parlamentu a nèrodnóch parlamentヮ, by tento po™adavek zmórnily s ohledem na revizi ustanovenó ｲèsti III (je™ jsou dost podrobnè a mnohè majó pochybnou ÿstavnó hodnotu), pﾖiｲem™ by dodr™ovaly zèkladnó zèsadu, ™e jakïkoli dalþó zv̅þenó pヮsobnosti Unie by muselo b̅t jednomyslnｸ schvèleno ｲlensk̅mi stèty.
E v en t h o u g h v a r i o u s p r o po s a l s were put forward which enjoyed broad support in Parliament and among the national parliaments and would have made this requirement a little more ‹ e x i b l e a s r e g a r d s the r e v iffs i on of the p r o v iffs i on s of P a r t I I I ( w h i c h a r e q u i t e detailed and many of which are of questionable constitutional value)
Na druhï stranｸ Parlament mヮ™e pouze uvótat zachovènó ¶pﾖemosﾝujócóch dolo™ekƒ (¶passerellesƒ), kterï navrhl Konvent pro pﾖechod od jednomyslnïho hlasovènó na hlasovènó kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou v Radｸ nebo pro pﾖechod od zvlèþtnóch legislativnóch postupヮ k ﾖèdnïmu legislativnómi postupu.
Conversely, Parliament cannot but welcome the retention of the `bridging clauses' (`passerelles') which the Convention proposed for changes from unanimous voting to q u a l i « e d m a jo r i t y v o t in g w i t h in the Council o r f r o m s p e c i a l legislative procedures to the ordinary legislative procedure.
Skuteｲnost, ™e toto rozhodnutó mヮ™e Evropskè rada pﾖijmout se souhlasem Parlamentu pouze jednomyslnｸ › a to pouze pokud ™èdn̅ z nèrodnóch parlamentヮ nepﾖedlo™ó v þestimｸsóｲnóm obdobó nèmitky › sk̅tè pﾖimｸﾖenou zèruku, ™e prèva vþech ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ budou nèle™it̅m zpヮsobem respektovèna a ™e rozhodnutó bude transparentnó a demokraticky platnï.
The fact that this decision can only be taken unanimously by the European Council with Parliament's consent - and then only if no national parliament expresses any objections within a six-month period - provides an adequate guarantee that due respect will be shown for the rights of each Member State and that the decision will be transparent and democratically valid.
Dalþóm pozitivnóm aspektem textu novï àstavy jsou zlepþenó uｲinｸnè v souvislosti s posólenou spolupracó, jejó™ v̅znam mヮ™e v budoucnu vzrヮst s ohledem na zèsadnó zv̅þenó poｲtu ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
Another positive aspect of the new constitutional text is the improvements made in connection with enhanced cooperation, the importance of which may increase in future in view of the substantial increase in the number of Member States.
Pﾖi stanovovènó podmónek nutn̅ch k zajiþtｸnó celkovï koheze a interinstitucionèlnó jednoty Unie àstava rozþiﾖuje rozsah posólenï spoluprèce (kterè se nynó mヮ™e vztahovat na vþechny oblasti, kterï nejsou zahrnuty pod v̅luｲnou pヮsobnost Unie, zatómco za souｲasn̅ch podmónek je obrannè politika vylouｲena) a usnadﾏuje jejó navèzènó.
While establishing the conditions required to ensure the overall cohesion and institutional unity of the Union, the Constitution extends the scope of enhanced cooperation (which can now apply to all areas not covered by the exclusive competences of the Union, while under the current arrangements defence policy is excluded) and facilitates their establishment.
V pﾖópadｸ posólenï spoluprèce se musó sejót alespoﾏ jedna tﾖetina ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ a Rada bude hlasovat kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou s v̅jimkou otèzek spoleｲnï zahraniｲnó a bezpeｲnostnó politiky, kde bude i nadèle vy™adovèna jednomyslnost.
Enhanced cooperation must bring together at least one-third of the Member States, withthe Council acting by a quali«edmajorityexcept in common foreign and security policy matters, where unanimity will continue to be required.
Kromｸ toho po™adavek t̅kajócó se souhlasu Parlamentu (mimo otèzek spoleｲnï zahraniｲnó a bezpeｲnostnó politiky) posóló demokratickou legitimitu rozhodnutó o navèzènó takovï spoluprèce.
Furthermore, the requirement that Parliament's consent be sought (except in common foreign and security policy matters) will enhance the democratic legitimacy of the decision to establish such cooperation.
A koneｲnｸ skuteｲnost, ™e se mezivlèdnó konferenci podaﾖilo zachovat ¶pﾖemosﾝujócó dolo™kuƒ (¶passerelleƒ) navr™enou Konventem, kterè usnadnó pﾖechod ke kvali«kovanï vｸtþinｸ nebo ﾖèdnïmu legislativnómu postupu v rèmci mechanismu posólenï spoluprèce, je takï vótan̅m v̅vojem.
Lastly, the fact that the Intergovernmental Conference managed to retain the `bridging clause' (`passerelle') proposed by the Convention, allowing a switch to quali«edmajorityvotingortheordinarylegislativeprocedurewithintheenhanced cooperation mechanism, is also a satisfactory development.
Dobrovolnï vystoupenó z Unie: poprvï ve smlouvèch ustavujócóch Evropskè spoleｲenstvó a potï Unii, kterï byly s v̅jimkou prvnó Smlouvy, kterè zaklèdala Evropskï spoleｲenstvó uhló a oceli, v̅slovnｸ uzavﾖeny na neomezenou dobu, kterï vþak nehovoﾖily o mo™nosti kolektivnóho nebo individuèlnóho vystoupenó z Unie, àstava stanovuje mechanismus ¶dobrovolnïho vystoupenó z Unieƒ (ｲlènek I-60).
Voluntary withdrawal from the Union: for the «rsttimeinthetreatiesestablishing the European Communities and then the Union, which - withthe exception of the « r s t treaty , w h i c h e s t a b l iffs h e d the European Cffo a l and S t e e l Community - were expressly concluded for an unlimited period but which made no provision for a collective or individual withdrawal procedure, the Constitution establishes a mechanism for `voluntary withdrawal from the Union' (Article I-60).
Je nutno podotknout ™e i pﾖesto, ™e neexistovala speci«ckè ustanovenó, bylo takto mo™no postupovat i
It must of course be acknowledged that, in the absence of any speci«cprovisions,suchamovewasanywayalreadypermissibleunderinternational treaty law.
4 5 dﾖóve podle mezinèrodnóho smluvnóho prèva. Avþak dóky tomu, ™e ustanovenó o vystoupenó jsou nynó v̅slovnｸ zahrnuta do àstavy, jsou stanovena podrobnè opatﾖenó pro ﾖeþenó takovï situace a je jasnｸ dèno na vｸdomó, ™e ™èdn̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt se nemusó nadèle ÿｲastnit tohoto evropskïho projektu, pokud si to nebude jeho obyvatelstvo pﾖèt.
4 9 provided for in the Constitution both lays down detailed arrangements for dealing with such a situation and sends out the clear message that no Member State is obliged to continue to be involved in the European project if its people no longer wish it to be involved.
Spolu s ustanovenómi o posólenï a strukturovanï spoluprèci to jasnｸ ﾖókè, ™e anga™ovanost v Unii a podpora jejóch politik je nｸｲóm, pro co je nutno se rozhodnout svobodnｸ na zèkladｸ skuteｲnｸ politickïho zèvazku.
When taken together withthe provisions on enhanced and structured cooperation, this clearly demonstrates that involvement in the Union and in the furtherance of its policies is something that must be chosen freely on the basis of a genuine political commitment.
Mezivlèdnó konference byla svolèna na zèkladｸ ｲlènku 48 Smlouvy o Evropskï unii, v nｸm™ je stanoveno, ™e nehledｸ na rozsah zmｸn stèvajócóch smluv, kterï navrhuje (vｲetnｸ jejich zruþenó, jak je stanoveno v ｲlènku IV-437 nèvrhu àstavy), tyto zmｸny nevstoupó v platnost do doby, ne™ budou rati«kovèny vþemi ｲlensk̅mi stèty v souladu s jejich ÿstavnómi po™adavky.
The Intergovernmental Conference was convened on the basis of Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union, which stipulates that whatever the scope of the amendments it proposes be made to the existing treaties (including their repeal, as provided for in Article IV-437 of the draft Constitution), the amendments will not come into force until they have been rati«edbyall the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.
To znamenè, ™e ustanovenó ｲlènku IV-447 àstavy se budou vztahovat pouze na budoucó rati«kaｲnó postupy.
This means that the provisions set out in Article IV-447 of the Constitution will apply to future r a t i « c a t i on p r o c e s s e s on l y .
V ｲlènku IV-447 je stanoveno, ™e pokud by dva roky po zahèjenó jakïhokoli postupu rati«kacezmｸn Smlouvy o àstavｸ mｸlo tento postup ukonｲit jeþtｸ jedna pｸtina ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ nebo by se u nich pﾖi rati«kacivyskytlypotó™e (co™ zahrnuje takï mo™nost, ™e znｸnó smlouvy bude jednóm nebo vóce stèty zamótnuto), bude tato zèle™itost pﾖedèna Evropskï radｸ.
A r t i c l e I V - 4 4 7 s t a t e s t h a t i f , t w o years after the commencement of any procedure for the rati«cationofchanges to the treaty establishing the Constitution, one - « f t h of the M e m b e r S t a t e s have yet to complete the procedure or have encountered di/cultiesin proceeding with rati«cation(whichalsocoversthepossibilityofthetexthaving been rejected by one or more of them), the matter will be referred to the European Council.
S ohledem na rati«kacipヮvodnó smlouvy zaklèdajócó àstavu, mezivlèdnó konference schvèlila politickï prohlèþenó (ｲ. 30), jeho™ podmónky jsou podobnï podmónkèm ｲlènku IV-447 uvedenïmu v̅þe a kterï mè b̅t zaｲlenｸno do zèvｸreｲnïho aktu.
With a view to the r a t i « c a t i on of the o r i g in a l treaty e s t a b l iffs h in g the C on s t i tffu t i on , the IGC adopted a political declaration (No 30), the terms of which are similar to those of Article IV-447 referred to above, which was incorporated in the Final Act.
V minulosti v pﾖópadech, kdy se v nｸkter̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètech vyskytly v prヮbｸhu rati«kacepﾖedchozóch Smluv problïmy, byla zèle™itost samozﾖejmｸ pﾖedèna Evropskï radｸ.
In the past, in cases where problems have occurred in some Member States during the procedure for ratifying earlier treaties, the matter has of course been referred to the European Council.
Avþak zaｲlenｸnóm tohoto ustanovenó v souladu s nèvrhem Konventu se mezivlèdnó konference sna™ila o vyslènó politickïho poselstvó, ™e by bylo obtó™nï smóﾖit se s tóm, ™e by nevelkè menþina ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ zabrènila ostatnóm v pohybu vpﾖed, zejmïna s ohledem na skuteｲnost, ™e àstava mimo jinï zakotvila mo™nost dobrovolnïho vystoupenó z Unie a mo™nost ÿｲastnit se posólenï nebo strukturovanï spoluprèce, v nó™ se nemusejó anga™ovat vþechny ｲlenskï stèty.
However, by including this provision in line withthe Convention's proposals, the IGC wished to send out the political message that it would be di/culttoacceptthata smallminorityof Member States prevent the others from moving forward, particularly in view of that fact that the Constitution provides inter alia for the option of voluntary withdrawal from the Union and that of taking part in enhanced or structured cooperation, in which not all the Member States are required to be involved.
Takovè situace by mｸla podnótit vyjednèvènó s cólem najót ﾖeþenó, kterï by nejen bralo v ÿvahu situaci v ｲlenskïm stètｸ, kter̅ nenó schopen rati«kovatàstavu, ale pﾖedevþóm takï situaci ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ, kterï ji pﾖijómajó.
Such a situation should give rise to negotiations aimed at « n d in g a s o l uijt i on t h a t t a k e s a c cffo u n t of n o t on l y the s i tffu a t i on of the M e m b e r
Celkovï hodnocenó/doporuｲenó ke schvèlenó àstavy
Overall assessment/recommendation to approve the Constitution
S ohledem na v̅þe uvedenó musó b̅t celkov̅ nèzor Parlamentu o v̅sledcóch mezivlèdnó konference, kterè byla ukonｲena v ｲervnu 2004, rozhodnｸ pozitivnó s tóm, ™e odrè™ó ÿroveﾏ ambicó, o nó™ se vｸtþina domnóvala, ™e jó nebude mo™no dosèhnout v geopolitickïm kontextu, v nｸm™ cel̅ proces probóhal od Laekenskïho prohlèþenó o budoucnosti Evropskï unie v prosinci 200133.
Given the above, Parliament's overall opinion on the outcome of the IGC which concluded in June 2004 must be «rmlyinfavour,giventhatitre‹ectsa level of ambition that few people felt would be possible to attain in the geopolitical context in which the entire exercise has been conducted since the Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union in December 200133.
Postup, pomocó nｸho™ Konvent vypracoval àstavnó smlouvu, byl v̅jimeｲn̅ s ohledem na ÿｲast a na stupeﾏ transparentnosti.
The procedure under which the Constitutional Treaty was drafted by the Convention was unprecedented in terms of the level of participation and degree of transparency.
Hlavy stètヮ nebo vlèd potï schvèlily text, kter̅ bude pﾖedlo™en k rati«kacivevþech ｲlensk̅ch stètech.
Subsequently, the Heads of State or Government adopted the text that will be put up for r a t i « c a t i on in a l l the M e m b e r S t a t e s .
V̅sledn̅ dokument je v̅sledkem kompromisu dosa™enïho mezi rヮzn̅mi stranami, zejmïna nèrodnómi vlèdami a nèrodnómi parlamenty, jim™ je na nèrodnó ÿrovnó svｸﾖena demokratickè legitimita, Evropsk̅m parlamentem a Komisó, kterï konajó jmïnem institucó EU, a obｲany, a to na individuèlnó ÿrovni a prostﾖednictvóm organizacó obｲanskï spoleｲnosti. ¶Kompromisƒ vþak neznamenè dohodu na zèkladｸ nejni™þóho spoleｲnïho jmenovatele.
The resulting document is the outcome of a compromise reached among various parties, namely the national governments and national parliaments, in which democratic legitimacy is vested at national level, the European Parliament and Commission, acting on behalf of the EU institutions, and citizens, both individually and through civil society organisations. However, `compromise' does not mean an agreement on lowest common denominators.
Naopak, nehledｸ na uveden̅ nedostatek jsou ustanovenó àstavy velmi ambiciùznó, co™ je nｸco, co se zdèlo b̅t utopió v politickïm kontextu, ve kterïm prèce probóhala od tï doby, kdy Laekenskï prohlèþenó uvedlo v prosinci 2001 tento proces do pohybu.
On the contrary, despite the shortcoming described above, its provisions are extremely ambitious, which is something that had appeared Utopian in the light of the political context in which the work was conducted since the Laeken Declaration set the process in motion in December 2001.
Upevnｸnó ÿstavnóch zèkladヮ Unie a jeho institucionèlnóho rèmce a racionalizace a zjednoduþenó jejóch nèstrojヮ mヮ™e koneｲnｸ po dvou desetiletóch neustèl̅ch reforem pﾖinïst stabilitu.
The consolidation of the constitutional foundations of the Union and its institutional framework and the rationalisation and simpli«cationofitsinstruments are capable of at last bringing stability following two decades of permanent reform.
Stabilitu a jistotu, je™ se objevujó ve vþech ÿstavnóch textech, doplﾏujó ustanovenó, kterè jednak organizujó rozvoj rozhodovacóho procesu a jednak umo™ﾏujó vyu™óvat mechanizmy posólenï a/nebo strukturovanï spoluprèce, pﾖiｲem™ je ponechèna dostateｲnè pru™nost k upravenó zpヮsobu, kter̅m Unie funguje, aby se mohla vyrovnat s ÿkoly, kter̅m bude v nèsledujócóch letech ｲelit.
The stability and certainty that area feature of all constitutional texts are complemented by provisions which both organise the development of the decision-making process and enable use to be made of enhanced and/or structured cooperation mechanisms providing the ‹exibilityrequiredtoadjust the way in which the Union operates so as to enable it to tackle the challenges it will be facing in coming years.
àstava pﾖedevþóm posiluje demokracii uvnitﾖ Evropskï unie, podporuje ÿｲinnｸjþó rozhodovènó, zﾖetelnｸji ukazuje, kdo co v Unii dｸlè a zjiþﾝuje kompetence, kterï na jednï stranｸ zóskala Unie a na druhï stranｸ ｲlenskï stèty.
Above all, however, the Constitution enhances democracy within the European Union, fosters more e.ectivedecision-making,ensuresgreaterclarity about who does what in the Union and the competences assigned
S ohledem na v̅þe uvedenï by mｸl Parlament pﾖevzót vedoucó ÿlohu pﾖi obhajobｸ a obranｸ àstavy a mｸl by pomèhat podporovat a upevﾏovat politickou vヮli, kterè je nutnè k jejómu ÿplnïmu zavedenó.
Given the above, Parliament should take a leading role in promoting and defending the Constitution and should help to foster and consolidate the political will required for it to be fully implemented.
To by mｸlo b̅t zahèjeno aktivnó ÿｲastó v diskusóch, kterï se konajó v souvislosti s rati«kaｲnóm procesem.
This should start with an active involvement in the debates taking place in connection withthe rati«cationprocess.
Vstoupila v platnost dne 23. ｲervence 1952. Belgie, Nｸmecko, Francie, Itèlie, Lucembursko a Nizozemsko.
Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.
Podepsèna dne 2. ﾖójna 1997, vstoupila v platnost 1. kvｸtna 1999.Podepsèna dne 26. ÿnora 2001, vstoupila v platnost 1. ÿnora 2003.
Signed on 26 February 2001, came into force on 1 February 2003.
Podepsèna v tómｸ dne 29. ﾖójna 2004, mｸla by vstoupit v platnost dne 1. listopadu 2006 (viz ｲlènek IV-447), pokud budou do tohoto data ulo™eny vþechny rati«kaｲnó listiny.
Signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 and should enter into force on 1 November 2006 if all the instruments of rati«cationhavebeendepositedbythatdate.
Usnesenó k pﾖópravｸ mezivlèdnóch konferencó a posuzovènó jejich v̅sledkヮ:
Resolutions on the preparations for the IGCs and assessing their outcomes:
Jednotn̅ evropsk̅ akt
Single European Act
144)a ze dne 17. dubna 1986 (àﾖ. vｸst. C 120, 20. 5. 1986, s.
144) and 17 April 1986 (OJ C 120, 20.5.1986, p. 96)
96)Maastrichtskè smlouvausnesenó ke zprèvｸ D. Martina ze dne14. bﾖezna 1990 (àﾖ. vｸst. C 96, 17. 4. 1990, s. 114),11. ｲervence 1990 (àﾖ. vｸst. C 231, 17. 9. 1990, s. 97)a 22. listopadu 1990 (àﾖ. vｸst. C 324, 24. 12. 1990, s.
ヒ" resolutions on the report by D. Martin of 14 March 1990 (OJ C 96, 17.4.1990, p. 114),
81)Amsterodamskè smlouva
Treaty of Amsterdam
Niceskè smlouva
Treaty of Nice
EVROPSKä PARLAMENT SE VYSLOVUJE K EVROPSKÏ à S T A V V
OJ C 80, 10.3.2001, pp. 85 and 86.
Je tﾖeba zde zmónit pouze ﾖómskou konferenci (¶Assisesƒ) zahrnujócó nèrodnó parlamenty (Konference parlamentヮ Evropskïho spoleｲenstvó, kterè se konala od 27. do 30. listopadu 1990), interinstitucionèlnó konference konanï paralelnｸ s mezivlèdnómi konferencemi o hospodèﾖskï a mｸnovï unii a politickï unii, kterï vyvrcholily nèvrhem Maastrichtskï smlouvy, ÿｲastó parlamentnóch zèstupcヮ na prèci R e ‹ e c t i o n G r o up p ﾖ e d amsterodamskou mezivlèdnó konferencó a jejich nèslednï zapojenó jako pozorovatelヮ do skupiny ustanovenï na pﾖópravu mezivlèdnó konference v Nice.
Mention need be made here only of the Rome `Assises' involving the national parliaments (Conference of the Parliaments of the European Community, held from 27 to 30 November 1990), the interinstitutional conferences held in parallel withthe IGCs on Economic and Monetary Union and Political Union, which culminated in the drafting of the Maastricht Treaty, the participation by Parliament representatives in the work of the R e ‹ e c t i on G r o upp r i o r t o the A m s t e r d a m I G C , f o l l o w e d b y the i r in v o l v e m en t in the p r o c e e d in g s of the IGC itself, and, «nally,theirinvolvementasobserversinthegroupsetuptopreparethe Nice IGC.
Usnesenó ze dne 25. ﾖójna 2000 (zprèva Oliviera Duhamela o konstitucionalizaci Smluv) potvrdilo usnesenó ze dne 31. kvｸtna 2001 (zprèva Mïndeze de Viga/Segura o Smlouvｸ z Nice [a jejóm hodnocenó] a budoucnosti Evropskï unie).
Resolution of 25 October 2000 (report by Olivier Duhamel on the constitutionalisation of the Treaties), con«rmedbytheresolutionof31May2001(Mïndez de Vigo/Seguro report on the [assessment of the] Treaty of Nice and the future of the European Union).
Myþlenka pﾖijmout podobnou Chartu, jakè dnes tvoﾖó ｲèst II nèvrhu àstavy, byla poprvï pﾖedstavena nｸmeck̅m pﾖedsednictvóm v Radｸ, kterï zajistilo jejó pﾖijetó na zasedènó Evropskï rady v Kolónｸ nad R̅nem ve dnech 3. a 4. ｲervna 1999.
The idea of adopting such a Charter, which today forms Part II of the Constitution, was «rstputforward by the German Council Presidency, which secured its acceptance by the Cologne European Council of 3 and 4 June 1999.
Zpヮsob navr™enó novï charty byl takï stanoven na tomto zasedènó Evropskï rady a potï upﾖesnｸn na nèsledujócóm zasedènó, kterï se konalo v Tampere ve dnech 15. a 16. ﾖójna 1999.
The method of drafting the Charter was also laid down at that European Council meeting, then c l a r i « e d a t the f o l l o w in g m e e t in g h e l d in T a m p e r e on 1 5 and 1 6 O c t o b e r 1 9 9 9.
Bylo rozhodnuto ustanovit ¶orgènƒ, dodateｲnｸ oznaｲen̅ jako Konvent, kter̅ sdru™ó ｲtyﾖi strany Konventu o budoucnosti Evropy, pﾖiｲem™ pﾖistupujócó stèty zapojeny nebudou.
I t was decided to establish a `body' - subsequently termed `Convention' - bringing together the four component parts of the Convention on the Future of Europe, but without the involvement of the applicant States.
Usnesenó ze dne 29. listopadu 2001: Leinenova/Mïndez de Vigova zprèva o zasedènó Evropskï rady v Laekenu a o budoucnosti Unie (àﾖ. vｸst. C 153, 27. 6. 2002, s. 310(E))
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT`S OPINION ON THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION
1 7 àstava se net̅kè Smlouvy o Euratomu › kterè tedy bude i nadèle v platnosti soubｸ™nｸ s àstavou ›, pﾖesto™e nｸkterè jejó ustanovenó byla pozmｸnｸna protokolem upravujócóm Smlouvu o Euratomu, tak aby byla kompatibilnó s textem àstavy.
The Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC/Euratom) is not, however, a . e c t e d b y the C on s t i tffu t i on and w i l l the r e for e r e m a in in force a l on g s i d e i t , a l t h o u g h s o m e of i t s p r o v iffs i on s have been amended by the Protocol modifying the Euratom Treaty with a view to making them compatible withthe constitutional text.
Nicmïnｸ Nｸmecko, Irsko a Rakousko ji™ vyslovily pﾖènó › v prohlèþenó 44 pﾖipojenïm k zèvｸreｲnïmu aktu Mezivlèdnó konference ›, aby co nejdﾖóve byla svolèna mezivlèdnó konference s cólem revidovat Smlouvu o Euratomu.
However, Germany, Ireland and Austria have expressed the wish, in declaration No 44 annexed to the Final Act of the IGC, that an Intergovernmental Conference be convened as soon as possible to revise the Euratom Treaty.