natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
K d y Š byla sepisovâna tato zprâva, pouze t┼i ┘lenskê stâty jeùt┞ nem┞ly uffl o Š e n y ratifika┘nî listiny.Vùechny odpov┞di ┘lenskþch stât╉ lze konzultovat v pracovnîm dokumentu, kterþ je ke zprâv┞ p ┼ i l o Š e n (SEK(2005) 973), zprâva poskytuje pouze velmi souhrnnþ p┼ehled.Uzav┼enî dohod bylo na v r Š e n o s t┞mito zem┞mi: Albânie, Armênie, B┞lorusko, Bosna a Hercegovina, Kanada, ﾚîna, Chor-vatsko, Spojenê arabskê emirâty, Indonêsie, Japonsko, Laos, Malajsie, Panama, Rumunsko, Rusko, Srbsko a ﾚernâ hora, Singapur, Tchaj-wan, Thajsko, Tunisko, Vietnam, ‡zem┞ St┼ednîho vþchoduƒ, ‡balkânskê zem┞ƒ, ‡zem┞ severnî Afrikyƒ, ‡zem┞ jihovþchodnî Asieƒ. V platnost vstoupily dohody o spoluprâci podepsanê s Indiî dne 20.10.2004 a s Mexikem dne 26.3.2001.
At the time this report was drafted, only three Member States had not yet deposited their instrument of ratification.All the answers by Member States can be consulted in the working document (SEC(2005) 973) relating to the report, since the report gives only a very summarised overview.
2 2 je seznam kontaktnîch mîst p┼i k a Š d ê m zasedânî vþboru pro vzâjemnou spoluprâci (dva-krât nebo t┼ikrât za rok), bylo uvedeno, Še je n┞kdy o b t î Š n ê ur┘it p┼îsluùnþ orgân t┼etî zem┞ nebo ┘lenskêho stâtu (zasîlâ-li Šâdost t┼etî stât).
Although the Commission updates and distributes the contact list during each mutual assistance committee meeting (two or three times a year), it has been reported that sometimes it is difficult to determine the competent authority in a third country in a Member State (when a request is sent by a third country).
Zpracovânî sd┞lenî o rizicîch podvodu. ﾚlenskê stâty informujî Komisi o rizicîch podvodu nebo jinê nesrovnalosti, pokud tato rizika nebo nesrovnalost majî pro Spole┘enstvî zvlâùtnî vþznam, a Komise sd┞lî tyto informace ostatnîm dot┘enþm ┘lenskþm stât╉m69.
Handling of fraud risk messages. Member States are required (47) to inform the Commission of risks of fraud or other irregularities that are of particular relevance at Community level, and the Commission conveys this information to other Member States.
V n┞kterþch ┘lenskþch stâtech jsou dva nebo vîce sprâvnîch orgân╉, j e Š jsou p┼îsluùnê pro uplat┵ovânî celnîch prâvnîch p┼edpis╉, ale uvedenâ sd┞lenî se zpracovâvajî stejnþm zp╉sobem jako Šâ-dosti o vzâjemnou spoluprâci: jednâ se o útvar nebo úst┼ednî koordina┘nî ú┼ad, kterþ o b d r Š î sd┞lenî a provede jeho prvnî analþzu, aby ur┘il p┼îsluùnþ orgân, kterþ mâ sd┞lenî zpracovat6:.
In some Member States, there are two or more competent administrations for the application of customs legislation; messages are then handled in the same way as other requests for mu-tual assistance; a central coordinating unit or office generally receives the message and conducts an initial analysis of it in order to determine which competent authority should deal with it (48).
Koordina┘nî útvar/ú┼ad p┼edâ Komisi (OLAFu) p┼îpadnê vþsledky.
The results are conveyed to the Commission (OLAF) by the coordinating unit/office.
Svolenî soudu je nezbytnê.
Necessity of a judicial authorisation.
Je-li pro provedenî ┘innosti, j e Š je nezbytnâ pro zpracovânî Šâdosti o vzâjemnou spoluprâci, v y Š a d o v â n souhlas soudnîho orgânu, musî bþt o b d r Š e n ê informace p┼edâny d o Š a d u j î c î mffu stâtu6;.
Where the consent of the judicial authority is re-quired to implement a measure needed to handle a request for mutual assistance, the in-formation thus obtained is conveyed to the requesting Member State (49).
Pro p┼edâvânî informacî m╉Še bþt nezbytnê dalùî svolenî soudu.
An additional judicial authorisation may be necessary for the transmission of information.
V ┘lenskþch stâtech se druhy vyùet┼ovacîch úkon╉ v y Š a d u j î c î c h svo-lenî soudnîho orgânu zna┘n┞ liùî; zejmêna pokud jde o pravomoci celnîch orgân╉ p┼i sprâvnîm vyùet┼ovânî.
Member States differ widely as to which types of investigative measures require authorisation from the judicial authority; in particular, the customs authorities have more extensive powers of administrative inquiry.
Kdykoli je vùak v obecnê rovin┞ v y Š a d o v â n o svolenî pro vyùet┼o-vacî úkon, je t┼eba rovn┞Š dalùî svolenî pro p┼edânî zprâvy d o Š a d u j î c î mffu stâtu72.
Generally speaking, however, each time such an authorisation is required to take an investigative measure, it is also required in order to send the report to the requesting Member State (50).
Dâle n┞kterê ┘lenskê stâty pro p┼edâvânî zîskanþch údaj╉ kladou dalùî podmînky, j e Š v na┼î-zenî nejsou stanoveny.
Certain Member States also impose additional require-ments, not laid down in the regulation, for transmitting the data obtained.
Zpracovânî Šâdostî podanþch po skon┘enî mise ve t┼etî zemi.
Treatment of reports submitted following a mission in a third country.
Po skon┘enî mise ve t┼etî zemi je zprâva podepsanâ ú┘astnîky mise spolu s dokumenty, kterê mohou bþt p o u Š i t y jako d╉kazy, sd┞lena p┼îsluùnþm ┘lenskþm stât╉m, i k d y Š se mise neú┘astnily73.
Following a Community mission in a third country, a report, countersigned by those taking part in the mission, and the supporting documentation which could be used as evidence, are sent to the Member States concerned even if they have not taken part in the mission (51).
Komise si p┼âla v┞d┞t, zda sd┞lenê zprâvy a dokumenty mohly bþt p o u Š i t y jako d╉kazy p┼i vymâhânî neoprâvn┞ vyplacenþch prost┼edk╉ u vnitrostâtnîho soudu bez ohledu na skute┘nost, zda se ┘lenskþ stât mise ú┘astnil ┘i nikoli. ﾚlenskê stâty na tuto otâzku odpov┞d┞ly kladn┞.
The Commission wished to know if the reports and documentation could be used as evidence in a recovery procedure before a national court, whether the Member State took part in the mission or not. The Member States replied in the affirmative.
Pokud vùak orgâny t┼etî zem┞ tuto zprâvu nepodepîùî (jejich podpis prâvnî p┼edpisy Spo-le┘enstvî n e v y Š a d u j î ) , mohou tîm bþt zp╉sobeny p o t î Š e p┼i dokazovânî b┞hem ┼îzenî v ┘lenskêm stât┞, kterþ se mise neú┘astnil.
However, there may be dif-ficulties with the evidence in a recovery procedure in a Member State that has not taken part in the mission in cases where the third country has not signed the report, something which is not required by the Community regulation.
Statistiky o d╉sledcîch sd┞lovanþch p┼îpad╉.
Statistics on follow-up of cases reported.
Sd┞lovânî sprâvnîch a soudnîch rozhodnutî p┼ijatþch na zâklad┞ oznâmenþch p┼îpad╉ je v souladu se zmîn┞nþm na┼îzenîm povinnê74.
Communication of the administrative and judi-cial decisions on reported cases is obligatory (52). Although several Member States plan to
ﾚlânek 18 na┼îzenî 515/97.V Polsku je hlavnîm partnerem Komise kancelâ┼ pro mezinârodnî vztahy ministerstva financî, ale v n┞kterþch p┼îpa-dech je t┼eba rovn┞Š kontaktovat celnî orgâny.
The cooperation agreements signed with India (20.10.2004) and Mexico (26.3.2001) came into force.Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 515/97.In Poland, the Bureau for International Treasury Relations is the main correspondent of the Commission, but the customs authorities must also be contacted in a certain number of cases.
Oba útvary jsou odbory ministerstva financî.ﾚlânek 3 na┼îzenî 515/97.S vþjimkou Polska, Slovenska a Francie v p┼îpad┞ celnîch vyùet┼ovânî.ﾚlânek 20 na┼îzenî.ﾚlânek 49; sd┞lenî se obvykle provâdî prost┼ednictvîm systêmu OWNRES.
Both services are departments of the Ministry of Finance.Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 515/95.With the exception of France, Poland and Slovakia concerning customs investigations.Article 20 of the regulation.Article 49 of the regulation, generally made through the OWNRES system.
Opat╄enî, kterâ Komise p╄ijala v roce 2004
Measures taken by the Commission in 2004
Zlepùenî spoluprâce v oblasti zem┞d┞lstvî a cel.
Stepping up cooperation in agricultural and customs matters.
Na zâklad┞ tematickê zprâvy generâlnîho ┼editelstvî pro rozpo┘et o zpracovânî sd┞lenî o vzâjemnê spoluprâci75 Komise s ┘lenskþmi stâty vedla konzultace a potvrdila pot┼ebu:
Following the thematic report of the Budget DG on the handling of mutual assistance messages (53), the Commis- sion consulted the Member States and confirmed the need to:
« zvþùit efektivnost pracovnîch metod, a to modern┞jùî a rychlejùî vþm┞nou informacî a jejich modern┞jùîm a rychlejùîm monitorovânîm;
̋ reinforce the efficiency of working methods by faster and more modern exchange and follow-up of information;
« zajistit vhodn┞jùî prost┼edî pro vzâjemnê dopl┵ovânî se nâstroj╉ pro odhalovânî, vyùet-┼ovânî a stîhânî (provâzanost mezi kartami o vzâjemnê spoluprâci, celnîm informa┘-nîm systêmem (CIS)76 a evidencî jednotlivþch p┼îpad╉ vyùet┼ovânî celnîch orgân╉ (FI-DE)77);
̋ foster a better cooperative environment between the tools of detection, investigation and prosecution (articulation between mutual assistance sheets, CIS (54) and
« v┞tùîho souladu mezi p┼îsluùnþmi cîli r╉znþch útvar╉ Komise.
̋ better synergy between the respective aims of various Commission departments.
V roce 2004 byla zahâjena studie proveditelnosti s cîlem p┼ipravit vytvo┼enî elektronickê zprâvy ‡Vzâjemnâ spoluprâce / sd┞lenî podvoduƒ.
In 2004, a feasibility study was conducted with a view to creating an electronic message: `Mutual assistance/fraud communication'.
Rozùî┼enî spoluprâce na dalùî oblasti.
Extension of cooperation to other areas.
Dne 20. ┘ervence 2004 Komise p┼edala nâvrh na┼î-zenî Evropskêho parlamentu a Rady o vzâjemnê sprâvnî spoluprâci78.
On 20 July 2004, the Commission submitted a proposal for a Parliament and Council regulation on mutual administrative assist-ance (56).
Navrhovanê na┼îzenî by poskytlo podrobn┞jùî prâvnî zâklad v boji proti podvod╉m a na úrovni Spole┘enstvî by napomâhalo spoluprâci a koordinaci s Komisî, zejmêna s OLAFem.
The proposed regulation could provide a more detailed legislative framework in the fight against fraud and encourages cooperation with and coordination by the Commission, par-ticularly OLAF.
Nâvrh na┼îzenî je horizontâlnî povahy a tþkâ se vùech odv┞tvî boje proti podvod╉m poùko-zujîcîm Spole┘enstvî, pro n┞Š jeùt┞ neexistujî odv┞tvovê prâvnî p┼edpisy, a to zejmêna spo-luprâce mezi ┘lenskþmi stâty a Komisî v boji proti podvod╉m uvnit┼ Spole┘enstvî v oblasti DPH79, strukturâlnîch fond╉ a p┼îmþch vþdaj╉.
The proposal is horizontal: it covers all the areas involved in the fight against Community fraud not yet addressed by sectoral legislation, in particular the cooperation between Member States and the Commission in the fight against intra-Community VAT fraud (57), the Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
Nâvrh se rovn┞Š tþkâ v y u Š i t î informacî o finan┘nîch operacîch, u n i c h Š je podez┼enî na legalizaci vþnos╉ z podvod╉ poùkozujîcîch Spole┘enstvî.
It also concerns the use of information on financial transactions suspected of involving laundering of proceeds from Community fraud.
Spoluprâce by m┞la bþt zam┞┼ena na z â l e Š i t o s t i , j e Š majî pro Spole┘enstvî zvlâùtnî vþznam, tzn. takovê, kterê mohou p┼ivodit ztrâtu na dani alespo┵ 500 000 EUR v p┼îpad┞ podvodu v oblasti DPH a 100 000 EUR v ostatnîch p┼îpadech.
Cooperation should be used above all for cases of particular impor-tance for the Community, i.e. tax losses of at least EUR 500 000 in cases of VAT fraud or of EUR 100 000 in other cases.
Tematickâ zprâva z roku 2002 o zpracovânî sd┞lenî o vzâjemnê spoluprâci v ┘lenskþch stâtech.Databâze ‡Celnî informa┘nî systêmƒ byla stanovena Úmluvou ze dne 26. ┘ervence 1995 o p o u Š î v â n î informa┘nî tech-nologie pro celnî ú┘ely (Ú┼. v┞st. C 316, 27.11.1998).
Thematic report of 2002 on the handling of mutual assistance messages in the Member States.Database `Customs information system', foreseen by the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the Use of Information Tech-nology for Customs Purposes (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995).
Komise dbâ o to, aby byly v y m o Š e n y ┘âstky, kterê Spole┘enstvî neoprâvn┞n┞ vyplatila na zâklad┞ chyby, podvodu nebo jinê nesrovnalosti, a aby byly vybrâny vlastnî zdroje.
The Commission supervises the recovery of amounts unduly paid by the Communities as the result of an error, fraud or another irregularity, and the collection of own resources.
V oblasti p┼îmêho ┼îzenî spadâ vymâhânî do jejî pravomoci.
In the areas directly managed by it, the Commission itself is responsible for recovery.
V oblastech decentralizovanêho ┼îzenî je pravomoc sdîlenâ; Komise monitoruje postupy vymâhânî zahâjenê ┘lenskþmi stâ-ty a p┼îpadn┞ uplatnî postupy revize ú┘etnîch doklad╉.
In areas in which management has been decentralised, this responsibility is shared, with the Commission following the recovery procedures initiated by the Member States or else applying the clearance procedures.
V roce 2004 Komise p┼ijala vîcero opat┼enî s cîlem zlepùit vybîrânî vlastnîch zdroj╉, zejmê-na v oblastech zem┞d┞lstvî, strukturâlnîch fond╉ a p┼îmþch vþdaj╉.
In 2004, the Commission took several measures aimed at improving recovery of own resources, agricultural funds, Structural Funds and direct expenditure.
ﾚlenskê stâty jsou odpov┞dnê za vybîrânî tradi┘nîch vlastnîch zdroj╉.
Member States are responsible for the recovery of traditional own resources.
Musejî vêst ‡ú┘ty Aƒ7:, ve kterþch jsou evidovâny zaplacenê a/nebo zajiùt┞nê celnî dluhy, a ‡ú┘ty Bƒ, ve kte- rþch jsou evidovâny nevybranê dluhy, kterê nejsou ani zajiùt┞nê (nebo jsou zajiùt┞nê, jsou vùak spornê).
The Member States must keep `A accounts' (58) for the registration of paid and/or guaranteed customs debts, and `B accounts' for the registration of either unpaid or not guaranteed debts (or debts guaranteed but contested).
V┞tùina dluh╉ zapsanþch v ú┘tech B je vþnos z odhalenþch podvod╉ nebo nesrovnalostî.
Many debts appearing in the B accounts are the result of fraud or irregularities detected.
Ve zprâv┞7; bylo analyzovâno sedmnâct p┼îpad╉ vybîrânî, kterê byly p┼edm┞tem sd┞lenî o vzâjemnê spoluprâci OLAFu a z n i c h Š se k a Š d þ tþkal vîce ┘lenskþch stât╉ a m┞l finan┘nî dopad na rozpo┘et Spole┘enstvî p┼evyùujîcî jeden milion EUR.
A report (59) analysed 17 cases of recovery which were the subject of previous mutual as-sistance communications from OLAF, involved several Member States and had a financial impact of over EUR 1 million on the Community budget.
Vybranê p┼îpady se tþkaly r╉znêho z b o Š î a r╉znþch mechanism╉ podvodu (zmanipulovanê celnî hodnoty, zfalùovanê ceny a nepravdivâ prohlâùenî o p╉vodu).
The sample involved different types of asset and fraud mechanisms (false customs values, false prices and false declara-tions of origin).
Komise konstatovala, Še se stâle zvyùuje podîl skute┘n┞ vybranþch dluh╉ (2 % v posuzovanêm vzorku v roce 1994, 12 % v roce 1998 a 15 % v roce 2003).
The Commission observed a steady improvement in the effective rate of debt recovery (2 % for the sample examined in 1994, 12 % in 1998 and 15 % in 2003).
ﾚlenskê stâty jsou rovn┞Š odpov┞dnê za zaznamenâvânî údaj╉ o vùech p┼îpadech odhale-nþch podvod╉ a nesrovnalostî do databâze ‡OWNRESƒ, pokud mohou mît finan┘nî dopad na tradi┘nî vlastnî zdroje p┼evyùujîcî 10 000 EUR.
Member States are also responsible for entering all cases of detected fraud and irregularities in the OWNRES database if they have a potential financial impact of traditional own resources over EUR 10 000.
Vzhledem k tomu, Še tyto p┼îpady majî bþt zpravidla uvedeny rovn┞Š v ‡ú┘tech Bƒ, p┼istoupila Komise ke srovnânî, j e h o Š vþsledky byly mâlo uspokojivê.
Because it is to be expected that customs debts over EUR 10 000 will appear not only in OWNRES but also in the B accounts, the Commission, in 2003, compared the two. The results of this comparison were not very satisfactory.
P┼i zopakovânî tohoto úkonu v roce 2004 byla zjiùt┞na zna┘nâ zlep-ùenî.
When the Commission did the exercise in 2004 significant improvements became evident.
To znamenâ, Še tyto p┼îpady (v┘etn┞ velice o b t î Š n ┞ vymahatelnþch dluh╉ zp╉sobenþch podvody a nesrovna-lostmi) musî bþt Komisî vyhodnoceny.
This means that all such cases (including very difficult to recover debts arising from fraud and irregularities) must be presented to the Commission for evaluation.
V y u Š i t î nâhrady bude nynî systematickê (┘lânek 73); uplat┵uje se do vþùe pohledâvek Spole┘enstvî v╉┘i k a Š d ê mffu d l u Š n î k o v i , kterþ sâm mâ oprâvn┞nou, pevn┞ stanovenou a splatnou pohledâvku v╉┘i Spole┘enstvî.
From now on, systematic use will be made of offsetting (Article 73), whereby any claim that the Communities have on a debtor who himself has a claim on the Communities that is confirmed, quantified and due will be offset as to an equivalent amount.
Uvedenê ustanovenî j i Š bylo uve-deno v ┘lânku 256 Smlouvy, ale Šâdnê zn┞nî sekundârnîho prâva neup┼esnilo zp╉sob jeho provâd┞nî.
This possibility was provided for in Article 256 of the EC Treaty, but no implementing regulations had been issued.
Novê finan┘nî na┼îzenî mimo jinê zavâdî automatickê vybîrânî úrok╉ z prodlenî u vùech
In addition, the new financial regulations introduce automatic collection of late payment interest for any debt not repaid on the due date (62), and significantly increase the amount
Smluvnî zâruky pro lepùî sprâvu smluv.
Contractual warranties for better contract management
Vþplata zâloh nebo poskytnutî p┼edb┞Šnêho financovânî bez p┼im┞┼enê nâhrady p┼i platb┞ p┼edstavujî pro finan┘nî zâjmy Spole┘enstvî nezanedbatelnê riziko.
Payment of advances or granting of pre-financing without consideration at the time of payment constitutes an appreciable risk for the Communities' financial interests.
Tento nâstroj je vùak nezbytnþ pro uskute┘n┞nî n┞kterþch ┘innostî, j e Š jsou v souladu s cîli politik Spole┘enstvî.
However, such payments are an essential tool for carrying out certain actions that meet Community policy objectives.
Novê finan┘nî na┼îzenî a zejmêna na┼îzenî, kterþm se stanovî jeho provâd┞cî pravidla, sta-novî ┼adu opat┼enî, kterâ toto riziko zmîr┵ujî.
The new financial regulations, and in particular the regulation laying down detailed rules for its implementation, provide for a number of measures that miti-gate this risk.
V p┼îpadech stanovenþch provâd┞cîmi pra-vidly musî p┼ed o b d r Š e n î m p┼edb┞Šnêho financovânî smluvnî strany nebo p┼îjemci p┼e-dem s l o Š i t zâruku.
Thus, in the cases provided for by the implementing rules, the contractors or beneficiaries must provide a guarantee in advance before receiving pre-financing.
Útvary Komise se prost┼ednictvîm standardnîch ustanovenî smluv a dohod (v┘etn┞ usta-novenî smluv s kandidâtskþmi zem┞mi a t┼etîmi zem┞mi v oblasti zahrani┘nî pomoci nebo ú┘asti na programech Spole┘enstvî) ujistily o za┘len┞nî ú┘innþch ustanovenî pro oblast vymâhânî prost┼edk╉.
The Commission's departments, through standard contracts or conventions (including agreements with candidate and third countries in the area of foreign aid or participation in Community programmes), ensure that effective provisions on recovery are included.
Vymâhânî v adheznîm ╄îzenî a cestou p╄edb┦Šnêho opat╄enî v prâvnîch p╄edpisech ┡lenskþch stât]
Recovery by joining a civil action to criminal proceedings and precautionary measures under Member States' legislation
Studie zve┼ejn┞nâ ve zprâv┞ za minulþ rok86 ukâzala, Še ve v┞tùin┞ ┘lenskþch stât╉ Komise m╉Še v trestnîm ┼îzenî uplatnit nârok na nâhradu ùkody a na úroky, aby bylo zajiùt┞no vymâhânî nârok╉ Spole┘enstvî spjatþch s p┼îmþmi vþdaji.
The study published in last year's report (64) showed that, in the majority of Member States, the Commission is entitled to join a civil action to ongoing criminal proceedings with a view to obtaining damage to secure recovery of Community entitlements related to direct expenditure.
Adheznî ┼îzenî se p o v a Š u j e za ú┘innþ nâstroj k usnadn┞nî úsilî Komise p┼i vymâhânî dluh╉ v oblasti p┼îmþch vþdaj╉.
Launching a civil action within criminal proceedings is considered an effec-tive instrument to facilitate the Commission's efforts to recover debts in the field of direct expenditure.
Skþtâ vîce vþhod, zejmêna zkrâcenî lh╉t pro ┼îzenî. V ┘lenskþch stâtech, kterê majî prâvnî systêm common law87, mâ vùak Komise, t ┼ e b a Š e nem╉Še uplatnit nârok na nâhradu ùkody v trestnîm ┼îzenî, m o Š n o s t uplatnit nârok na nâhradu ùkody.
It offers several advantages, including the shortening of legal proceedings.
V roce 2004 Komise cht┞la prohloubit analþzu podmînek, za n i c h Š m╉Še zastupovat Spole┘enstvî v soudnîm ┼îzenî tþkajîcîm se p┼îmþch vþdaj╉.
In 2004, the Commission wished to make a more detailed assessment of the conditions under which it may represent the Community in legal proceedings relating to direct ex-penditure.
Dva ┘lenskê stâty nebyly schopny dodat odpo-
The questionnaire submitted to the Member States took the form of a case study
L 357, 31.12.2002, ┘lânek 86.Sazba úrok╉ z prodlenî je referen┘nî sazba, kterou p o u Š î v â Evropskâ centrâlnî banka, navþùenâ o sedm procentnîch bod╉ v p┼îpad┞, Še se jednâ o zakâzky na s l u Š b y a na dodâvky, a o 3,5 procentnîho bodu v ostatnîch p┼îpadech.
This is a significant increase with respect to the previous rate (the reference rate plus 1.5 percentage points).COM(2004) 573.Ireland, United Kingdom.
Jednâ se o zna┘nê navþùenî oproti p┼edchozî sazb┞, kterâ odpovîdala referen┘nî sazb┞ navþùenê o 1,5 %.KOM(2004) 573.Irsko, Spojenê krâlovstvî.P┼edb┞Šnâ opat┼enî jsou takovâ opat┼enî, kterâ stâtnî zâstupce nebo soudce m╉Še na┼îdit s cîlem o b Š a l o v a n ê mffu zabrâ-nit, aby se p┼ed p┼ijetîm rozhodnutî soudu zbavil majetku.
Precautionary measures are those measures which the prosecutor or the court may order to prevent the defendant from dispersing his assets before the court reaches its decision.
Zahrnujî zmrazenî a zajiùt┞nî majetku vyùet┼ovanê osoby.
They include the freezing and seizing of the defendant's assets.
Tîm spîùe je nezbytnê, aby úzce spolupra-covala se soudnîmi orgâny.
This highlights the need for the Commission to have close cooperation with national judicial authorities.
Zprâva z roku 2004 Komisi rovn┞Š u m o Š n i l a , aby se lêpe se-znâmila s podmînkami, kterê v y Š a d u j î prâvnî p┼edpisy ┘lenskþch stât╉ pro podânî nâvrhu na vydânî p┼edb┞Šnêho opat┼enî.
The 2004 report also gives the Commission a better under-standing of the conditions under which applications for precautionary measures should be made following national legislations.
Ve Ùvêdsku nâ-rok v Š d y uplat┵uje stâtnî zâstupce.
In Sweden, the prosecutor is entitled to submit the claim.
Ve Finsku a v Portugalsku m╉Še takovê ┼îzenî zahâjit stâtnî zastupitelstvî, pokud to p o v a Š u j e za vhodnê.
In Finland and Portugal, it can be made by the prosecutor if he considers it appropriate.
V takovêm p┼îpad┞ nenî nezbytnê, aby Komise nârok uplat┵ovala.
In this case, there will be no need for the Commission to make an application.
Finsko nicmên┞ zd╉raznilo, Še, pokud Komise p o Š a d u j e nâhradu ùkody a opîrâ se o skute┘nosti, kterê nejsou v Šalob┞ stâtnîho zastupitelstvî uve-deny, musî uplatnit nârok, ve kterêm tyto skute┘nosti oz┼ejmî, a pro tyto skute┘nosti p ┼ e d l o Š i t d╉kazy.
Finland pointed out that, if the Commission applies for damages on the basis of facts which are not shown in the charge drawn up by the prosecutor, those facts should be presented in the claim together with the supporting evidence.
V n┞kterþch ┘lenskþch stâtech se rovn┞Š v y Š a d u j e , aby byly p ┼ e d l o Š e n y vùechny d╉kazy na podporu nâroku8: a/nebo ┘âstka, kterâ je p o Š a d o v â na jako nâhrada8;.
In certain Member States, it is also necessary to state all the facts supporting the object of
Navîc v n┞kterþch ┘lenskþch stâtech92 musî bþt v nâroku jasn┞ d o l o Š e na p┼î┘innâ souvislost mezi podvodem a ztrâtou, kterou rozpo┘et Spole┘enstvî utrp┞l.
Member States (70), the link of causality between the fraud and the loss to the Community budget must be clearly demonstrated in the application.
Pouze dva ┘lenskê stâty93 uvedly, Še nârok lze uplat┵ovat po zahâjenî hlavnîho lî┘enî.
Only two Member States (71) re- ported that a claim may be submitted after the opening of the trial.
P o Š a d a v k y na d╉kaz v souvislosti s uplatn┞nîm nâroku na nâhradu ùkody v trestnîm ┼îzenî.
Requirements as to evidence in relation to civil action within criminal proceedings.