natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ Dodatek k britskïmu zèkonu o duþevnóm zdravó (Mental Health Act), postaven̅ na dヮkazech od koordinètora projektu t̅kajócóho se otèzek souhlasu ™en s poruchami uｲenó, odvozen̅ch ze zkuþenostó zóskan̅ch v rèmci tohoto projektu.
‡ amendment to the UK Mental Health Act based on evidence from the project coordinator concerning the issue of consent for women with learning disabilities, derived from the expe-rience gained in this project;
‡ Novï postupy v Belgii umo™ﾏujócó R O M S K ä M dｸtem pokraｲovat v dochèzce do þkoly, bez ohledu na jejich prèvnó status v zemi.
‡ new procedures in Belgium to enable Roma children to continue their schooling despite their legal status in the country.
Faktor ¶politick̅ zèjem/zviditelnｸnóƒ je pro 13 % projektヮ takï omezujócóm faktorem.
The factor `political interest/visibility' is also a limiting factor for 13 % of the projects.
Nｸkteﾖó partneﾖi projektヮ mohou mót vliv na de«novènópolitick̅chprioritajejichimplementaci.Vznikpolitickïho zèjmu se obecnｸ mヮ™e zlepþit takto:
Some project partners might have an in‹uenceonthede«nitionofpoliticalprioritiesandtheirim-plementation. In general, the emergence of political interest can be improved as follows:
‡ Vytvèﾖenó platn̅ch a dヮvｸryhodn̅ch v̅stupヮ s cólem zóskènó veﾖejnï podpory, kterè na oplètku vyvolèvè zèjem politikヮ;
‡ by producing valid and credible outputs with the aim of gaining public support that in turn generates political interest;
‡ Tóm, ™e bｸhem projektu mème tｸsnï kontakty na klóｲovï lidi s pravomocó rozhodovat a na tvヮrce politiky, nebo mezi nｸ alespoﾏ þóﾖóme v̅sledky projektu.
‡ by having close contacts with key decision-makers and policy-makers during the project or at least by disseminating the outputs to them.
Podle tohoto posouzenó dopadu mヮ™eme na program DAPHNE nahló™et jako na program, kter̅ ÿspｸþnｸ pokraｲuje v mobilizaci sektoru nevlèdnóch organizacó na vþech ÿrovnóch, dヮ-sledkem ｲeho™ je vznik mnoha nov̅ch partnerstvó a aliancó, kterï spoleｲnｸ pracujó na jednot-nｸjþó evropskï politice boje proti nèsiló.
Following this impact assessment, the Daphne programme can be seen as successful in con-tinuing the mobilisation of the NGO sector at all levels, resulting in many new partnerships and alliances that are working together for more comprehensive European policies on vio-lence.
Sprèvnï postupy
Good practices
Aby se zlepþil v̅bｸr projektヮ a maximalizovalo se dosa™enó jejich cólヮ a dopadヮ, je dヮle™itï pochopit, jakï jsou faktory ÿspｸchu a tedy i sprèvnï postupy vyvinutï ÿspｸþn̅mi projekty.
In order to improve project selection and to maximise achievement and impact of the objec-tives, it is interesting to understand the factors of success and therefore the good practices developed by the successful projects.
V pﾖóloze 2 je uvedeno 15 projektヮ, kterï sprèvnï postupy vyvinuly.
In Annex 2, 15 projects that have developed good prac-tices are presented.
Kritïria pou™itè k v̅bｸru tｸchto sprèvn̅ch postupヮ jsou:
The criteria used for the selection of these good practices are as follows:
‡ Ve srovnènó s jin̅mi projekty v tïm™e oboru mè projekt nｸco, co se velice t̅kè jednoho nebo nｸkolika nèsledujócóch aspektヮ: metodologie, v̅stupヮ, dopadヮ, managementu, þóﾖe-nó, partnerstvó, ÿｲasti koncov̅ch pﾖójemcヮ, ÿｲasti cólov̅ch skupin nebo evropanstvó.
‡ compared with other projects in the same «eld,theprojecthassomethingremarkableconcerning one or several of the following aspects: methodology, outputs, impacts, man-agement, dissemination, partnership, participation of end-bene«ciaries,involvementoftarget groups or European-ness.
Z toho vypl̅vè, ™e projekt je v tomto ohledu novètorsk̅ nebo si alespoﾏ vede mnohem lïpe ne™ jinï projekty.
This implies that the project is innovative in this regard or at least does much better than others in this respect;
‡ Sprèvn̅ postup byl klóｲov̅m prvkem, kter̅ pﾖómo pﾖispóval k ÿspｸchヮm a dopadヮm pro-jektu.
‡ the good practice was a key element that directly contributed to the achievements and impacts of the project.
Hodnotitel uvè™il rozsah a povahu dopadu projektu, kter̅ mヮ™e b̅t danïmu kon-krïtnómu sprèvnïmu postupu pﾖipsèn.
The evaluator has considered the extent and nature of impact from the project that can be attributed to that speci«cgoodpractice;
‡ Projekt byl prヮkopnick̅, pokud jde o zaplﾏovènó mezer. Stojó za to jej dèle þóﾖit nebo repli-kovat jako odezvu na podobnï potﾖeby kdekoliv v Evropｸ.
‡ the project was a pioneer in «llingagap.Itisworthbeingfurtherdisseminatedorrepli-cated in response to similar needs elsewhere in Europe.
15 sprèvn̅ch postupヮ se t̅kè hlavnｸ nèsledujócóch pﾖópadヮ:
The 15 good practices mainly refer to the following cases:
‡ Projekt vyvinul jedineｲnou metodologii zahrnujócó vþechny zÿｲastnｸnï a uva™ujócó vþechna ﾖeþenó, jak pohnout prostitutky k samostatnosti.
‡ the project developed a unique methodology, involving all players and considering all solutions to bring prostitutes to autonomy;
‡ Projekt vyvinul nov̅ pﾖóstup k vþeobecnïmu problïmu, otèzku nèsiló vヮｲi ™enèm uchopil tak, ™e zkusil zmｸnit postoje mu™sk̅ch pachatelヮ.
‡ the project developed a new approach to a common problem, tackling the issue of violence against women by trying to change the male perpetrators' attitudes;
‡ Dobrè spoluprèce mezi medièlnómi a nemedièlnómi partnery, kterè zvyþuje kvalitu þóﾖenó projektu.
‡ the project developed a high-quality questionnaire favouring a high response rate to a survey;
‡ Existovaly vysokï mo™nosti pﾖenosu v̅sledkヮ projektu, proto™e projekt se tïmatem zab̅-val v Evropｸ poprvï nebo proto™e se pﾖóstup a v̅stupy dajó snadno replikovat v jin̅ch ze-móch Evropy.
‡ the project results have a high potential for transferability because the topic has been ap-proached for the « r s t t i mffe i n E u r op e o r b e c a u s e t h e a p p r o a c h a n d o u tp uijt s c a n e a s i l y b e r e p l i c a t e d in other European countries.
Implementace DAPHNE a mechanismus doruｲovènó
Daphne implementation and delivery mechanisms
Hodnotitelï si vy™èdali nèzory koordinètorヮ na procedury pﾖi pﾖedklèdènó projektu DAPHNE a uzavórènó smlouvy, na webovï strènky DAPHNE, podporu od DAPHNE bｸhem projektu a vyhodnocovacó a monitorovacó systïmy.
The opinions of the coordinators were solicited on the Daphne submission and contract pro-cedures, the Daphne website, the support from Daphne during the project and the evaluation and monitoring systems.
Pokud jde o ostatnó ｲèsti pﾖehledu, hodnotitelï potvrdili konzistenci nèzorヮ.
As for other parts of the survey, the «eldevaluatorshavevalidatedthe consistency of these opinions.
Tato ｲèst hodnotó 218 projektヮ «nancovan̅chodroku1997doroku2003,kromｸtïmatt̅ka-jócóch se nèslednïho vyhodnocenó, kterï se t̅kè pouze dokonｲen̅ch projektヮ.
This section considers the 218 projects funded from 1997 to 2003, except for the topics re-lated to the ex-post evaluation exercise that refers to the completed projects only.
àroveﾏ spokojenosti s procedurami pﾖi pﾖedklèdènó projektヮ DAPHNE a pﾖi uzavórènó smluv
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne submission and contract procedures
Procedury pﾖi pﾖedklèdènó projektヮ DAPHNE a uzavórènó smluv
Daphne submission and contract procedures
Srozumitelnost v̅zev k pﾖedlo™enó nèvrhヮ
Clarity of the calls for proposals
Srozumitelnost nèvodヮ a pomocn̅ch dokumentヮ v dobｸ pﾖópravy pﾖedlo™enó projektu
Clarity of guidelines and supporting documents at time of preparation of submission
Rychlost fèze uzavórènó s m l u v K v a l i t a podpory Evropskï komise bｸhem jednènó o smlouvｸKvalita podpory Evropskï komise bｸhem pﾖópravnï f è z e T r a n s p a r e n t n o s t procesu v̅bｸru àroveﾏ spokojenosti s webov̅mi strènkami DAPHNE
Promptness of the contracting p h a s e Q u a l i tffy of EC support during negotiation of cffo n t r a c t Q u a l i tffy of EC support during the preparation p h a s e T r a n s p a r e n c y of the selection process
U™iteｲnost webov̅ch strènek DAPHNE jako nèstroje ke sdólenó v̅sledkヮ projektヮ
Usefulness of the Daphne website when preparing s u b m i s s i o n s T i mffe l i n e s s of the information on the w e b s i t e U s e r - f r i e n d l i n e s s of the w e b s i t e U s e f u l n e s s of the Daphne website as a means of sharing results of projects
70 % àroveﾏ spokojenosti s podporou DAPHNE bｸhem projektu
Level of satisfaction with the Daphne support during the project
Podpora DAPHNE bｸhem projektu
Daphne support during the project
Dosa™itelnost zamｸstnancヮ Evropskï komise bｸhem p r o j e k t u Z è v a ™ n o s t rad/informacó zóskan̅ch od Evropskï komise bｸhem p r o j e k t u N è l e ™ i t o s t a srozumitelnost komentèﾖヮ k p r o j e k t ヮ m / ÿ ｲ t ヮ m F l e x i b i l i t a povolenè Evropskou komisó pﾖi ﾖózenó k o n t r a k t u R y c h l o s t platebnóch procedur àroveﾏ spokojenosti s vyhodnocovacóm a monitorovacóm systïmem
Reachability of the EC s t a . d u r i n g t h e p r o j e c t R e l e v a n c e of advice/information received from the EC during the p r o j e c tP e r t i n e n c e and clarity of the comments made on the p r o j e c t s / a c cffo u n t s F l e x i b i l i tffy allowed by the EC in managing the cffo n t r a c tP r o m p t n e s s of the payment procedures
Anal̅za ÿrovnｸ spokojenosti ¶transparentnost procesu v̅bｸruƒ a ¶kvalita podpory Evropskï komise bｸhem pﾖópravnï fèzeƒ v prヮbｸhu let ukèzala, ™e ve srovnènó s pﾖedchozómi lety bylo bｸhem nｸkolika poslednóch let (od r. 2001 do r. 2003) spokojeno vóce koordinètorヮ projektヮ.
Usefulness of monitoring visits for managing the p r o j e c tffU s e f u l n e s s of monitoring visits for the project o u tp uijt s U s e f u l n e s s of ex-post evaluation exercises for future p r o j e c t s U s e f u l n e s s of ex-post evaluation exercises for the impacts
% spokojen̅ch koordinètorヮ projektヮ bｸhem doby199719981999200020012002200358 52 33 50 66 61 63
% of satis«edprojectcoordinatorsovertime1998199920002001200252 33 50 66 61
Kvalita podpory Evropskï komise bｸhem pﾖópravnï fèze
Quality of EC support during preparation phase
Poznèmka: Dalþó pﾖóklady sprèvn̅ch postupヮ a metodologie vyvinutï projekty DAPHNE (19) najdete na webov̅ch strènkèch DAPHNE: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Remark: Other examples of good practices and methodologies developed by Daphne projects (19) can be read on the Daphne website: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Z tohoto struｲnïho pﾖehledu vypl̅vè, ™e zkuþenosti, kterï pﾖinesla iniciativa DAPHNE rozhod-nｸ byly bohatï a ™e nadｸje Evropskïho parlamentu vlo™enï do zalo™enó iniciativy a programu DAPHNE 2000›2003 byly z velkï ｲèsti splnｸny.
From this brief overview it is clear that the Daphne experience has been rich indeed and that the aims of the European Parliament in establishing the Daphne initiative and the Daphne programme 2000›03 have been largely met.
Zv̅þila se kapacita organizacó v Evropｸ zab̅-vajócóch se ochranou dｸtó, mlède™e a ™en pﾖed nèsilóm v jeho mnoha podobèch.
The capacity of organisations in Europe to pro-tect children, young people and women from violence in its many forms has been enhanced.
Dｸti, mlède™ a ™eny tak zóskaly ochranu a podporu.
Children, young people and women have been protected and supported.
Rozþóﾖila se znalostnó zèkladna a byly vytvoﾖeny nèstro-je, kterï budou i nadèle dèvat vｸtþó pravomoci jak obｸtem nèsiló, tak tｸm, kteﾖó pracujó jejich jmïnem.
The knowledge base has been expanded and tools have been produced that will continue to empower both victims of violence and those who work on their behalf.
Velkou v̅zvou vþak zヮstèvè prevence nèsiló v budoucnosti a nutnost snó™it ÿroveﾏ nèsiló v souｲasnosti.
But the huge challenge remains prevention of violence in the future and the imperative to reduce violence now.
Aby se tak stalo, je tﾖeba dèle pracovat na identi«kacipﾖóｲinnèsilóanasnazeporozumｸtjehopachatelヮm.
For this to happen, work needs to continue on identifying and understanding the causes of violence and the perpetrators of it.
Bude nutnï pﾖijmout tvrdè rozhodnutó vy™adujócó politick̅ zèvazek a zamｸﾖenó se na vymèhènó zèkona, boj proti zneu™óvènó drog a alkoholu, snó™enó kriminality a vyslènó jasnïho poselstvó o nulovï toleranci.
Tough decisions will have to be made that require political commitment and that focus on law enforcement, combating drug and alcohol abuse, reduc-ing crime and sending out clear messages of zero tolerance.
Prostﾖednictvóm projektヮ DAPHNE byla mobilizovèna skuteｲnè armèda Evropanヮ a nèstroje, kterï potﾖebujó k tomu, aby mohli pﾖispｸt k boji proti nèsiló, majó po ruce. Toto je bitva, kterou musóme vyhrèt.
A veritable army of Europeans has been mobilised through the work of Daphne projects, and the tools they need to contribute to the «ghtagainstviolenceareathand.Thisisonebattlethat must be won.
V Daphne Toolkit je k dispozici kompilace 303 projektヮ «nancovan̅chodroku1997doroku2003, vｲetnｸ pouｲenó a nèstrojヮ: h t t p : / / d a p h n e - t o o l k i t . o r g
A compilation of the 303 projects funded from 1997 to 2003, with lessons and tools, is available in the Daphne Toolkit: h t tp : / / d a p h n e - t o o l k i t . o r g
Webovou strènku o programu DAPHNE naleznete na nèsledujócó adrese: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
A website about the Daphne programme can be found at the following address: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / f u n d i n g / d a p h n e / f u n d i n g _ d a p h n e _ e n . h t m
Informace o generèlnóm ﾖeditelstvó pro spravedlnost, svobodu a bezpeｲnost lze nalïzt na adrese: h t t p : / / e u r o p a . e u . i n t / c o m m / j u s t i c e _ h o m e / i n d e x _ e n . h t m
Information about the Justice, Freedom and Security Directorate-General can be found at: h t tp : / / e u r op a . e u . i n t / cffo m m / ju s t i c e _ h o mffe / i n d e x _ e n . h t m
Dotazy t̅kajócó se programu DAPHNE je mo™nï zaslat prostﾖednictvóm:
Enquires about the Daphne programme can be made via:
Adresa pro zasólènó poþty:
The postal address is:
‡ Vedoucó personèlnóch oddｸlenó, vedenó spoleｲnostó
Forms of violence addressed‡ Child sexual abuse
‡ Sexuèlnó zneu™óvènó dｸtó‡ Zneu™óvènó dｸtó (obecnｸ)‡ Zranitelnost spojenè s ÿtｸkem (dｸti)‡ Zneu™óvènó migrujócóch domècóch pracovnókヮ‡ Nèsiló vyvolanï drogami a alkoholem‡ Rasovｸ motivovanï nèsiló‡ Kulturnó a etnickï nèsiló‡ Znèsilnｸnó‡ Domècó nèsiló na ™enèch a dｸtech‡ Socièlnó izolace‡ Zneu™óvènó posti™en̅ch ™en‡ Nèsiló dopóvajócóch‡ Nèsiló v rodinｸ‡ Mrzaｲenó ™ensk̅ch pohlavnóch orgènヮ‡ Obchod se ™enami a dｸtmi‡ Komerｲnó sexuèlnó zneu™óvènó dｸtó‡ Zneu™óvènó ™en na venkovｸ‡ Sebepoþkozovènó mlède™e‡ Zneu™óvènó autistick̅ch ™en a dｸtó ‡ Nèsiló proti ™adatelヮm o azyl a uprchlókヮm‡ Nèsiló proti homosexuèlヮm‡ Sexuèlnó obtｸ™ovènó na pracoviþti‡ Þikanovènó ve þkolèch‡ Dｸtskè pornogra«enainternetu‡ Nèsiló proti starþóm ™enèm‡ Nèsiló ve vzdｸlèvacóch stﾖediscóch‡ Fyzickï trestènó dｸtó‡ Sexuèlnó zneu™óvènó dｸtó v institucóch
‡ EU regional and local representatives‡ Municipal authorities‡ Helpline operators‡ Expert groupings‡ Policy-makers at EU level‡ Police, juvenile o.enders'services‡ Hospitals and healthcare providers‡ Counselling services‡ Social workers and authorities‡ Teachers, teacher trainees, education managers‡ Streetworkers and outreach organisations‡ Media professionals‡ Migrant communities‡ Cultural organisations‡ Tertiary students and student unions‡ Shelter and refuge operators‡ Human resource managers, corporate managers‡ Trade unions and employers' organisations‡ Community workers‡ Families, parents and parents-to-be‡ Church groups including youth clubs‡ Law-makers, judiciary‡ Youth groups‡ Public institutions and statutory organisations‡ Sta.ofresidentialinstitutions‡ Research institutions‡ Prison personnel‡ Military personnel‡ NGO personnel‡ Childcare workers‡ Volunteer associations‡ Immigration o/cials‡ Men against violent men‡ Policy-makers at local, national and regional level‡ Grassroots community organisations and clubs‡ More general public awareness-raising
‡ Odborovï svazy a zamｸstnavatelskï organizace‡ Komunitnó pracovnóci‡ Rodiny, rodiｲe a nastèvajócó rodiｲe‡ Córkevnó skupiny vｲetnｸ klubヮ mlède™e‡ Zèkonodèrci, soudci‡ Skupiny mlède™e‡ Veﾖejnï instituce a veﾖejnoprèvnó organizace‡ Personèl ubytovacóch zaﾖózenó‡ V̅zkumnï instituce‡ Vｸzeﾏsk̅ personèl‡ Vojensk̅ personèl‡ Zamｸstnanci nevlèdnóch organizacó‡ Pracovnóci peｲujócó o dｸti‡ Sdru™enó dobrovolnókヮ‡ àﾖednóci pro ﾖózenó pﾖistｸhovalectvó‡ Mu™i proti nèsilnick̅m mu™ヮm
‡ Child abuse (general)‡ Vulnerability of being missing (children)‡ Exploitation of migrant domestic workers‡ Drug- and alcohol-induced violence‡ Racially motivated violence‡ Cultural and ethnic violence‡ Rape‡ Domestic violence against women and children‡ Social isolation‡ Abuse of handicapped women‡ Adolescent violence‡ Family violence‡ Female genital mutilation‡ Tra/ckingofwomenandchildren‡ Commercial sexual exploitation of children‡ Abuse against rural women‡ Self-harm among young people‡ Abuse of autistic women and children‡ Violence against asylum-seekers and refugees‡ Violence against homosexuals‡ Sexual harassment at work‡ Bullying in schools‡ Child pornography on the Internet‡ Violence towards elderly women‡ Violence in educational centres‡ Physical punishment of children‡ Sexual abuse of children in institutions‡ Prostitution and tra/ckingaroundmilitarybases‡ Violence against women in prison‡ Violence in families in military settings‡ Social violence against gypsy women‡ Sexual abuse of people with mental disability‡ Sexual violence by boys aged 12›16‡ Violence against women in cities‡ Violent crime‡ Violence against women in a church context‡ Domestic slavery‡ Gender-di.erentiatedviolence‡ Violence in poor socioeconomic conditions‡ Violence in the media‡ Racial and neo-fascist violence‡ Linguistic violence‡ Violence against unaccompanied minors
‡ Nèsiló mezi dospóvajócómi/nèsiló mezi rovnocenn̅mi mladistv̅mi
Forms of violence addressed‡ Dangerous care
‡ Nèsiló v pﾖópadｸ rozpadu rodiny‡ Nevolnickè prèce‡ Nèsiló v zanedban̅ch mｸstsk̅ch oblastech‡ Nèsiló proti zrakovｸ posti™en̅m ™enèm‡ Muｲenó a jeho nèsledky‡ àjma dｸtó ve vｸku 0›3 let v dヮsledku ÿstavnó pïｲe‡ Institucionèlnó nèsiló
‡ Violence against children with learning disabilities‡ Inter-family battery‡ Violence in schools‡ Violence in post-con‹ictsituations‡ Sexually abusive behaviour in institutions‡ Psychological violence‡ Intentional injury‡ Violence amongst adolescents/peer violence‡ Violence in cases of family break-up‡ Bonded labour‡ Violence in degraded urban areas‡ Violence against visually handicapped women‡ Torture and its aftermath‡ Harm of institutionalisation of 0›3 year-olds‡ Institutional violence‡ Violence through forced/inter-country marriage‡ Violence in temporary children's holiday places‡ Honour-based violence‡ Street-based violence‡ Online stalking and sexual predators‡ Stalking‡ Mobbing
Projekty vybranï jako sprèvnï postupy
Projects selected as good practices
Koncovó pﾖójemci jsou protagonisty projektu
E n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s a r e p r o t a g o n i s t s i n t h e p r o j e c t
Odヮvodnｸnó v̅bｸru: Protagonisty projektu jsou organizace invalidnóch ™en.
Justi«cationforselection: Disabled women organisations are protagonists in the project.
Popis sprèvnïho postupu: sóla projektu byla v zapojenó invalidnóch ™en, proto™e dvｸma partnery byly svazy invalidnóch ™en, co™ vyvolalo velkï zviditelnｸnó a pozdｸji i politick̅ zèjem.
Description of good practice: The strength of the project was the involvement of the dis-abled women, since two of the partners were associations of disabled women, which gen-erated great visibility and, later, political interest.
Sami pﾖójemci v̅hod pﾖipravili nèvod METIS, co™ mu dalo velkou sólu.
The bene«ciariesthemselvespreparedthe METIS guide which gave it great strength.
Nèvod i d e n t i - « k o v a l u r ｲ i t ï n è s i l n ï s i t u a c e , o n i c h ™ s ep ﾖ e d t ó m t o p r o j e k t e m v e Þ p a n ｸ l s k u n e v ｸ d ｸ l o , a navrhl, jak jim ｲelit.
The guide identi«esparticularsituationsofviolence that were unrecognised in Spain before this project and suggests how to confront them.
U™ sèm fakt, ™e invalidnó ™eny provèdｸjó projekt EU s mezinèrodnómi partnery, vyvolal politick̅ zèjem, tak™e mohly mluvit o lidsk̅ch prèvech a v̅voji osobnos-ti, otèzkèch, o kter̅ch invalidnó ™eny dﾖóve nediskutovaly.
The very fact that disabled women were carrying out an EU project with transna-tional partners gave it political interest, so that they could talk about human rights and personal development, issues not previously discussed with disabled women.
Projekt byl takï velice pヮsobiv̅ v nadnèrodnóm mｸﾖótku, ÿｲastnili se ho partneﾖi ze Þpanｸlska, Dènska, Nｸmecka a Anglie.
The project was also very impressive in a transnational way, involving Spanish, Danish, German and English partners.
Na to, jak velk̅ poｲet v̅znamn̅ch a trval̅ch v̅stupヮ projekt vytvoﾖil, stèl relativnｸ mèlo penｸz.
The project cost relatively little money for providing a large number of signi«cantandlastingoutputs.
Podmónka pﾖenosu/replikace: Projekt mヮ™e b̅t zopakovèn kdekoliv, kde majó invalidï za-lo™enu svou organizaci. Podpora zaklèdènó takov̅ch organizacó by mohla tvoﾖit souｲèst programu.
Condition of transfer/replication: This project should be replicable anywhere that disabled people have established their own associations.
V̅zkum, kter̅ odhalil skrytï nebo nerozpoznanï formy nèsiló na invalidnóch ™enèch, by se mｸl tïmｸﾖ urｲitｸ zopakovat v mnoha jin̅ch zemóch.
The research that revealed the `hidden' or unrec-ognised form of violence on disabled women would almost certainly be replicated in many other countries.
Odヮvodnｸnó v̅bｸru: Vynikajócó metodologie t̅kajócó se zapojenó koncov̅ch pﾖójemcヮ; do-pad na koncovï pﾖójemce
Justi«cationforselection: Outstanding methodology regarding the involvement of end-bene«ciaries;impactonend-bene«ciaries.
Popis sprèvnïho postupu: Projekt, kter̅ vytvoﾖil mimoﾖèdnou kapacitu pro koncovï pﾖó-jemce, tj. lidi s poruchami uｲenó, pﾖómo ovlivnil ™ivoty dalþóch koncov̅ch pﾖójemcヮ tóm, ™e se ÿｲastnili projektu, kter̅ je posólil. Projektu se pﾖómo ÿｲastnili zvlèþtｸ formou konzultacó a ｲinnostó pﾖi veﾖejnïm þóﾖenó v podobｸ þkolenó a pﾖednèþek.
Description of good practice: This project created an extraordinary capacity for e n d - b e n - e « c i a r i e s , i . e . p e op l e w i t h l e a r n i n g d i s a b i l i t i e s , t o h a v e d i r e c t i m p a c t o n t h e l i v e s o f o t h e r e n d - b e n e « c i a r i e s t h r o u g h i n v o l v i n g a n d e m po w e r i n g t h e m .
Hlavnómi v̅stupy projektu jsou takï materièly o sprèvnïm postupu, zahrnujócó materièly proti þikanｸ pro Informaｲnó a vzdｸ-lèvacó kampaﾏ (Information and Education Campaign (IEC)) podporujócó lidi s poruchami uｲenó. Koncovó pﾖójemci se ÿｲastnili kampanｸ.
The project's leading outputs are also good practice material, included anti-bullying materials for the information and education campaign (IEC) in favour of people with learning disabilities. End-bene«ciariesparticipatedinthecam-paign.
Kampaﾏ byla zamｸﾖena na sprèvnï publikum, tak™e neskonｲila v odpadu.
The audience for dissemination campaigns was well targeted to avoid them ending up in the rubbish bin.
Projekt mｸl na koncovï pﾖójemce velk̅ vliv. Lidï s poruchami uｲenó, kteﾖó se projektu pﾖómo ÿｲastnili, dosèhli podstatnïho zlepþenó svï sebeÿcty, sebe-dヮvｸry a chèpènó svï situace a toho, co s nó mohou dｸlat.
The project had greatest impact with regard to end-bene«ciaries.People with learning disabilities directly involved in the project showed substantial im-provement in their self-esteem, self-con«denceandunderstandingoftheirsituationandwhat they can do about it.
Koncovó pﾖójemci takï partnerヮm hlèsili ni™þó v̅skyt zneu™óvènó v jejich nejbli™þóm okoló ovlivnｸnïm ｲinnostó projektu.
End-bene«ciariesalsoreportedtopartnersthelowerincidenceof abuse in their own neighbourhood a.ectedbytheprojectactivity.