natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tento mechanismus se takï ukèzal jako impozantnó srovnèvacó nèstroj, kter̅ ｲlensk̅m stètヮm umo™ﾏuje ｲerpat nèpady a myþ-lenky jejich partnerヮ a pou™ót je pro ﾖeþenó spoleｲn̅ch problï-mヮ t̅kajócóch se prèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ zvlèþtｸ v novｸ regulovan̅ch oborech, jako jsou GMO (geneticky modi«kovanïorganismy),domïny a genovè terapie.
This mechanism has also proved to be a formidable benchmarking tool which allows Member States to draw on the ideas of their partners in order to solve common problems regarding technical regulations, especially in newly regulated sectors such as GMOs, domain names and gene therapy.
Kromｸ toho Komise smｸrnici 98/34/ES pou™óvè jako vzdｸlèvacó prostﾖedek, kter̅ mè pomoci pﾖizpヮsobit legislativnó zpヮsoby ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
Moreover, the Commission is using Directive 98/34/EC as an educational tool with a view to adjusting Member States' legis-lative style.
Systïm, kter̅ pomalu odstartoval, se zaｲal rychle rozvójet a stal se pro Komisi, ｲlenskï stèty a podniky oknem, jóm™ lze sledovat ｲinnost nèrodnóch zèkonodèrstvó a normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ v technickï oblasti (napﾖ. pravidla urｲujócó slo™enó, oznaｲovènó, zkouþenó atd. v̅robkヮ, jako™ i pravidla vztahujócó se na cel̅ spo-tﾖebnó cyklus v̅robku vｲetnｸ nalo™enó s nóm po ukonｲenó jeho ™ivotnosti).
The system, which got o.toaslowstart,hasgainedmomen-tum and has provided the Commission, the Member States and enterprises with a window on the activities of national authori-ties and standardisation bodies in the technical «eld(rulesre-lating to product composition, labelling, name, testing, etc., as well as rules relating to product life cycle through to disposal).
Pヮsobnost smｸrnice se postupnｸ rozþiﾖovala tak, ™e v souｲasnï dobｸ zahrnuje vþechny zemｸdｸlskï a prヮmyslovï v̅robky a poｲótè i se stèle rostoucóm poｲtem ustanovenó, pﾖe-devþóm tｸch, kterè brènó uskuteｲnｸnó takov̅ch opatﾖenó, kterè nepﾖómo po™adavek shody s technick̅mi podmónkami a po™a-davky obchèzejó.
The scope of the Directive has been progressively extended, so that it now covers all agricultural and industrially manufactured products and takes account of an ever growing number of pro-visions, in particular to prevent any measures which indirectly require compliance with technical speci«cationsfromslippingthrough the net.
V roce 1998 smｸrnice 98/48/ES postup rozþóﾖi-la o slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲnosti (3).
In 1998, the procedure was extended by Di-rective 98/48/EC to encompass rules on Information Society services.
Prostﾖednictvóm tohoto nèstroje mヮ™e Komise nejen ÿspｸþnｸ odstraﾏovat ustanovenó, kterè jsou v rozporu s prèvem Spole-ｲenstvó, ale takï mヮ™e ÿｲinnｸ pﾖispóvat k formulovènó ustano-venó, kterè budou souｲèstó nèrodnóch prèv, zajistó hospodèﾖ-sk̅m subjektヮm ÿplnou informovanost s ohledem na jejich prèva a umo™nó v praxi uplatﾏovat zèsadu ¶vzèjemnïho uznè-vènóƒ obsa™enou ve v̅kladu ｲlènku 28 a nèsl.
According to this principle, each Member State must accept the sale in its territory of any product lawfully manufactured or marketed in another Member State, subject, where legitimate interests, such as health and safety questions are at stake, to these products guaranteeing an equivalent level of protection.
Smlouvy Evrop-sk̅m soudem.
The corollary to this acceptance of products from the rest of
Smｸrnice takï slou™ila jako vzor pro àmluvu Rady Evropy (6).
The geographical scope of the Directive was also gradually ex-tended.
Podle uvedenï zèsady musó ka™d̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt na svïm ÿzemó dovolit prodej vþech v̅robkヮ vyroben̅ch v souladu s platn̅mi prèvnómi pﾖedpisy nebo uveden̅ch na trh v ostatnóch ｲlen-sk̅ch stètech za pﾖedpokladu, ™e takovï v̅robky splﾏujó na od-povódajócó ÿrovni zèkonnï po™adavky napﾖ. na ochranu zdravó a bezpeｲnost.
Directive 98/34/EC, which was already implemented in part in the EFTA countries since 1990, has also been partly extended to Turkey under the Association Agreement with that country.
Dヮsledkem pﾖijómènó v̅robkヮ z ostatnóch ｲlen-sk̅ch stètヮ Spoleｲenstvó, rozþóﾖenïho Smlouvou o Evropskïm
The Directive has also provided a model for a Convention of the Council of Europe.
(3) Smｸrnice 83/189/EHS byla pﾖevè™nｸ pozmｸnｸna smｸrnicó Rady 88/182/EHS z 22. bﾖezna 1988 (àﾖ. vｸst. L 81, 26.3.1988, str.
Directive 83/189/EEC was amended principally by Council Directive 88/182/EEC of 22 March 1988 (OJ L 81, 26.3.1988, p.
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES z 22. ｲervna 1998 kodi«kovalasmｸrnici83/189/EHSavþechny jejó nèslednï pozmｸﾏujócó nèvrhy, zatómco smｸrnice 98/48/ES z 20. ｲervence 1998 pozmｸnila smｸrnici 98/34/ES.
Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 c o d i « e d D i r e c t i v e 8 3 / 1 8 9 / E E C a n d a l l i t s s u bse q u e n t a mffe n d - mffe n t s while Directive 98/48/EC of 20 July 1998 amended Directive 98/34/EC.
(4) Smlouva mezi ｲlensk̅mi zemｸmi ESVO (EFTA) a EHS stanovila postup pﾖi poskytovènó informacó v oblasti norem a technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ a vstoupila v platnost v listopadu 1990.
The Agreement between the Member States of EFTA and the EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulationsentered into force in November 1990.
Smlouva o Evropskïm hospodèﾖskïm prostoru pou™itelnè od 1. ledna 1994 nèslednｸ zahrnula smｸrnici 83/189/EHS s nezbytn̅mi zmｸnami.
The Agreement on the European Economic Area, applicable since 1 January 1994, subsequently incorporated Directive 83/189/EEC with the necessary adaptations.
(5) Dohoda zaklèdajócó pﾖidru™enó mezi Evropsk̅m hospodèﾖsk̅m spoleｲenstvóm a Tureckem (àﾖ. vｸst. 1964, str. 3687) a rozhodnutó Rady pﾖidru™enó ES-Turecko ｲ.
Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey (OJ C Vol.
hospodèﾖskïm prostoru i na pﾖijómènó v̅robkヮ ze zemó ESVO (EFTA), kterï Smlouvu podepsaly (7), je vzèjemnï uznèvènó
tions, i.e. of all `measures which prohibit, impede or render less attractive the exercise of such freedoms' (freedom of establish-ment and freedom to provide services).
prèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ, kterï se vztahujó na nèvrh, v̅robu a zkouþe-nó v̅robkヮ a na pou™óvanï postupy posuzovènó shody. Plenskï stèty a Komise jsou o tｸchto prèvnóch pﾖedpisech informovèny prostﾖednictvóm postupu poskytovènó informacó stanovenïho ve smｸrnici 98/34/ES.
the Community- extended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area to products from EFTA countries signatory to the Agreement - is mutual recognition of the regulations relat-ing to the design, manufacture and testing of products, and the conformity assessment procedures used; the Member States and the Commission are informed about these regula-tions through the procedure for the provision of information established by Directive 98/34/EC.
Kromｸ toho se ustanovenó rozhodnutó Rady pﾖidru™enó ES-Tu-recko ｲ. 1/95 z 22. prosince 1995 o provèdｸnó zèvｸreｲnï fèze celnó unie (8), kterï stanovilo opatﾖenó pro odstranｸnó kvantita-
To be admissible as an exception to the fundamental freedoms of the internal market in a non-harmonised area, a national re-striction must, on the basis of this case law comply with the prin-ciples of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
Zvlèþtｸ, pokud se t̅kè svobody poskytovat slu™by, to znamenè, ™e nèrodnó pﾖedpis, kter̅ vヮbec nebere ohled na po™adavky, kterï ji™ hospodèﾖsk̅ subjekt ve svïm ｲlenskïm stètｸ pro pod-nik, ze kterïho slu™by nabózó (01), splnil, pﾖedstavuje neproporci-onèlnó omezenó, a je proto podle prèva Spoleｲenstvó nepﾖijatel-nï vþude tam, kde mè b̅t dotyｲnè slu™ba poskytovèna, jako v pﾖópadｸ slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, jestli™e jejó poskytovatel nemヮ™e vstoupit na ÿzemó ｲlenskïho stètu, v nｸm™ mè b̅t slu™ba pﾖijata (02).
As regards freedom to provide services, in particular, this means that national regulations which make no allowance for require-ments already met by an operator in his Member State of es-tablishment, from which he o.ershisservices will prove to be a disproportionate restriction and therefore inadmissible un-der Community law where the service in question is provided, as in the case of Information Society services, without the pro-vider having to enter the territory of the Member State in which the service is received.
tivnóch omezenó nebo opatﾖenó, kterè majó stejn̅ ÿｲinek mezi Evropskou unió a Tureckem, vyklèdajó pro ÿｲely jejich zavedenó a uplatnｸnó na v̅robky zahrnutï do celnó unie v souladu s od-povódajócómi rozhodnutómi Evropskïho soudu t̅kajócómi se ustanovenó Smlouvy o Evropskïm spoleｲenstvó, pﾖedevþóm je-jóch ｲlènkヮ 28 a™ 30.
Furthermore, the provisions of Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the « n a l p h a s e o ft h e C uffs t o m s U n i o n , which provides for the elimination of quantitative restrictions or measures having equivalent e . e c t b e t w e e n t h e E U a n d Tffu r k e y , a r e i n t e r p r e t e d f o r the purposes of their implementation and application to products covered by the Customs Union, in conformity with the relevant decisions of the European Court of Justice con-cerning provisions of the EC Treaty, in particular Articles 28 to 30 thereof.
Rozþóﾖenó pヮsobnosti smｸrnice 98/34/ES i o pou™itó postupu po-skytovènó informacó na pravidla pro slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲ-nosti poｲónaje srpnem 1999 zajistilo, ™e se pﾖedeþlo nov̅m pﾖe-kè™kèm, kterï by brènily usazovènó a volnïmu pohybu slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti prostﾖednictvóm mechanismu, kter̅ umo™ﾏoval anal̅zu sluｲitelnosti nov̅ch nèrodnóch pﾖedpisヮ v tïto oblasti s ｲlènky 43 a 49 Smlouvy o Evropskïm spoleｲenstvó.
Directive 98/34/EC, by extending the scope of application of the information procedure to rules on Information Society services, ensured, since August 1999, the prevention of new barriers to the freedom of establishment and the free move-ment of Information Society services by providing a mecha-nism to analyse the compatibility of new national legislation in this « e l d w i t h A r t i c l e s 4 3 a n d 4 9 o ft h e E C T r e a t y .
Komise dèle zajistila, aby plè-novanï nèrodnó pﾖedpisy nepヮsobily hospodèﾖsk̅m subjek-tヮm a mo™nè i u™ivatelヮm zbyteｲnï nebo pﾖóliþ vysokï nèklady na prèvnó ÿkony a administrativu.
According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, Ar-ticles 43 and 49 of the Treaty require the elimination of restric-
Aby mohla b̅t smｸrnice zcela ÿｲinnè, musó vþichni zÿｲastnｸnó, tj. nèrodnó orgèny, normalizaｲnó orgèny a hospodèﾖskï subjek-ty, dokonale rozumｸt jejóm ustanovenóm a b̅t si pﾖesnｸ vｸdomi
Therefore, when examining national draft rules in the « e l d o f I n f o r m a t i o n Society services, the Commission's overriding ob-jective has been, for example, basing itself on the case-law of the Court of Justice, to oppose any national regulatory ap-proach aimed at applying blanket, extra-territorial legal ar-rangements which make no distinction between operators based in the notifying Member State and those wishing to provide services in such Member State without, however, be-ing established there. The Commission has also made sure that planned national rules do not impose needless or exces-
7) Je tﾖeba zdヮraznit, ™e odpovódajócó ustanovenó Smlouvy o Evropskïm hospodèﾖskïm prostoru plató pouze ¶na v̅robky pochèzejócó ze zemó smluvnóch stranƒ a
It must be pointed out that the relevant provisions of the Agreement on the European Economic Area apply only to `products originating in the Contracting Parties' and not, consequently, to products simply marketed there.
sv̅ch prèv a povinnostó. To je jeþtｸ mnohem dヮle™itｸjþó po dub-nu 1996, kdy Soudnó dvヮr stanovil zèsadu, ™e nesplnｸnó ozna-movacó povinnosti v oblasti technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ vede k tomu, ™e jsou dotｲenï technickï pﾖedpisy pova™ovèny za neaplikova-telnï, a tudó™ nevymahatelnï na jednotlivcóch (03).
sults in the technical regulations concerned being inapplicable, so that they are unenforceable against individuals.
Kapitola I › Rozsah pヮsobnosti smｸrnice
Chapter I: The scope of the Directive tional regulations and standards involving barriers to in-tra-Community trade had not been monitored by the Commission and the Member States because certain products were not covered.
Plènek 1 de«nujev̅znam,kter̅smｸrnicedèvèklóｲov̅mpoj-mヮm pou™óvan̅m v jejóch ustanovenóch. Toto terminologickï a sïmantickï vyjasnｸnó je nutnï k porozumｸnó textu a souｲasnｸ de«nujerozsahpヮsobnostismｸrnice.
Article 1 d e « n e s t h e mffe a n i n g g i v e n b y t h e D i r e c t i v e t o a n u mb e r of key terms, used throughout its provisions.
Rozsah pヮsobnosti smｸrnice
The scope of the Directive
Aby bylo mo™nï vyjasnit velice þirokou de«nici,kterèsepou™ó-vè nynó, stojó za to pﾖipomenout, ™e Soudnó dvヮr zahrnul do skupiny ustanovenó t̅kajócóch se volnïho pohybu zbo™ó v ｲlèn-ku 28 Smlouvy ¶v̅robky, kterï je mo™nï ohodnotit penｸzi a kterï mohou proto b̅t pﾖedmｸtem obchodnóch transakcóƒ (07).V tïto souvislosti Soudrovnｸ™ rozhodl, ™e odpad, bez ohledu na to, je-li recyklovateln̅ nebo ne, se mè pova™ovat za v̅robek, jeho™ pohybu se v zèsadｸ nemè brènit (08).
In order to clarify the very broad de«nitionwhichisnowused,itisworth recalling that the Court of Justice included in the frame-work of the provisions relating to the free movement of goods under Article 28 of the Treaty, `products which can be valued in monetary terms and which may, as such, form the subject of com-mercial transactions'.In this context, the Court also ruled that waste, whether recyclable or not, is to be considered to be a prod-uct whose movement should not, in principle, be prevented.
Proto je pro urｲenó rozsahu pヮsobnosti smｸrnice vhodnï tyto skuteｲnosti brèt v ÿvahu.
It is appropriate to take this into consideration in determining the scope of the Directive.
Pro ÿｲely tïto smｸrnice se rozumó:
For the purposes of this Directive, the following meanings shall apply:
1) ¶v̅robekƒ ka™d̅ prヮmyslovｸ vyroben̅ v̅robek a ka™d̅ zemｸ-dｸlsk̅ produkt vｲetnｸ produktヮ rybolovu.
1) `product', any industrially manufactured product and any agri-cultural product, including «shproducts;
2) ¶slu™baƒ jakèkoli slu™ba informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, tj. ka™dè slu™ba poskytovanè zpravidla za ÿplatu, na dèlku, elektronicky a na indi-viduèlnó ™èdost pﾖójemce slu™eb (20).
2) `service', any Information Society service, that is to say, any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by elec-tronic means and at the individual request of a recipient of services.
Pro ÿｲely tïto de«niceserozumó:
For the purposes of this de«nition:
Do pヮsobnosti poｲèteｲnó verze smｸrnice (tj. 83/189/EHS) neby-ly zahrnuty kosmetickï v̅robky v rozsahu smｸrnice 76/768/
The scope of the initial version of the Directive (i.e. 83/189/EEC) excluded cosmetic products within the terms of Directive 76/768/EEC, medicinal products within the terms of Directive 65/65/EEC, products destined for human and animal consump-tion and agricultural products.
̌ ¶slu™bou poskytovanou na dèlkuƒ slu™ba poskytovanè bez souｲasnï pﾖótomnosti stran, nï pro lidskou spotﾖebu a pro spotﾖebu zvóﾖat a rovnｸ™ zemｸ-dｸlskï v̅robky (06).
› `at a distance' means that the service is provided without the parties being simultaneously present,
Pヮsobnost smｸrnice byla rozþóﾖena proto, ™e pou™óvènó ozna-movacóho postupu ukèzalo, ™e celè ﾖada nèrodnóch prèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ a norem obsahujócóch pﾖekè™ky pro vnitﾖnó trh Spole-
The scope of the Directive has been extended, since the opera-tion of the information procedure revealed that numerous na-
̌ ¶slu™bou poskytovanou elektronickyƒ slu™ba odeslanè z v̅cho-zóho mósta a pﾖijatè v móstｸ jejóho urｲenó prostﾖednictvóm elek-tronickïho zaﾖózenó pro zpracovènó a uchovèvènó dat (vｲetnｸ
› `by electronic means' means that the service is sent initially and received at its destination by means of electronic equipment for
169.05) Zruþeno smｸrnicó 2001/83/ES ze 6. listopadu ve Sbórce zèkonヮ Spoleｲenstvó ve vztahu k lïｲivヮm urｲen̅ch lidem. (àﾖ. vｸst. L 311, 28.11.2001, str. 67).
169.Repealed by Directive 2001/83/EC of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p.
06) Ve v̅znamu dﾖóvｸjþóho ｲlènku 38(1) Smlouvy (dnes ｲlènek 33(1) Smlouvy).07) Pﾖópad 7/68 ¶Komise evropskïho spoleｲenstvó versus Italskè republikaƒ [1968] ECR 617.
67.Within the meaning of former Article 38(1) of the Treaty (today Article 33(1) of the Treaty).Case 7/68 Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic [1968] ECR 617.Case 2/90 Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium [1992] ECR I-4431.
08) Pﾖópad 2/90 ¶Komise evropskïho spoleｲenstvó versus Belgickï krèlovstvóƒ [1992] ECR I-4431.1/) Pojem Informaｲnó spoleｲnosti byl zaveden smｸrnicó 98/48/ES a potom pou™it ve smｸrnici 98/84/ES o prèvnó ochranｸ slu™eb zalo™en̅ch na podmónｸnïm pﾖó- stupu nebo jej obsahujócóch (àﾖ. vｸst. L 320, 28.11.1998, str.
The notion of Information Society services was introduced by Directive 98/48/EC and then used in Directive 98/84/EC on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (OJ L 320, 28.11.1998, p.
54) a ve smｸrnici 2000/31/ES o urｲit̅ch prèvnóch aspektech slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, zvlèþtｸ ve vztahu k elektronickïmu obchodovènó na vnitﾖnóm trhu (àﾖ. vｸst. L 178, 17.7.2000, str. 1).
54) and Directive 2000/31/EC on certain legal aspects of information society services, in par-ticular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p. 1).
Dalþó informace t̅kajócó se tohoto prèvnóho pojmu a v obecnｸjþóm pohledu i aspektヮ smｸrnice 98/34/ES, zvlèþﾝ zamｸﾖen̅ch na slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, jak ji uvedla smｸrnice 98/48/ES, je mo™nï nalïzt v ¶Vade-Mecum to Directive 98/48/EC which Introduces a Mechanism for the Transparency of Regulations on Information Society Servicesƒ (Dok.
For more information concerning this legal notion and, more generally, on the aspects of Directive 98/34/EC s p e c i « c a l l y r e l a t e d t o I n f o r m a t i o n s o c i e t y s e r v i c e s , a s i n t r o d u c e d b y D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 4 8 / E C , o n e m a y c o n s u l t V a d e - Mffe c u m to Directive 98/48/EC which Introduces a Mechanism for the Transparency of Regulations on Information Society Services (Doc.
S-42/98 › EN (def.) › Generèlnó ﾖedite-telstvó III › Prヮmysl a Generèlnó ﾖeditelstvó XV › Vnitﾖnó trh a «nanｲnóslu™by).
S-42/98 › EN (def.) › Directorate-General III › In-dustry and Directorate-General XV › Internal Market and Financial Services.
digitèlnó komprese) a jako celek odeslanè, pﾖenesenè nebo pﾖi-jatè drètovｸ, rèdiovｸ, opticky nebo jin̅mi elektromagnetick̅-mi prostﾖedky,
in the framework of its tasks, particularly in social, cultural, edu-cational and legal areas.
V souladu s ｲlènkem 1 odst. 2 smｸrnice je slu™bou informaｲnó spoleｲnosti slu™ba poskytova-nè ¶na dèlkuƒ, ¶elektronickyƒ a ¶na individuèlnó ™èdost pﾖójemce slu™ebƒ.
the processing (including digital compression) and storage of data, and entirely transmitted, conveyed and received by wire, by radio, by optical means or by other electromagnetic means,
̌ ¶slu™bou na individuèlnó ™èdost pﾖójemce slu™ebƒ slu™ba posky-tovanè pﾖenosem dat na individuèlnó ™èdost.
› `at the individual request of a recipient of services' means that the service is provided through the transmission of data on indi-vidual request.
Pﾖóklady slu™eb, kterï nejsou zahrnuty do tïto de«nice,jsouuvede-ny v pﾖóloze V.
Next, it is necessary to verify whether the service is, in the terms of the Directive, an `Information Society service'.
Pojem ¶na dèlkuƒ se t̅kè situacó, v nich™ je slu™ba poskytovèna pomocó telekomunikaｲnóch metod, kterï jsou proto charakteri-zovèny skuteｲnostó, ™e zÿｲastnｸnï strany (tj. poskytovatel a pﾖó-jemce) nejsou fyzicky a souｲasnｸ pﾖótomny na stejnïm móstｸ.
In accordance with Article 1(2) of the Directive, Information Society service means a service provided: `at a distance', `by electronic means' and `at the individual request of a recipient of services'.
̌ slu™by rozhlasovïho vysólènó,
This Directive shall not apply to:
V̅raz ¶elektronickou cestouƒ znamenè slu™by, jejich™ podstat-nè ｲèst se vysólè, pﾖenèþó a pﾖijómè prostﾖednictvóm elektronickï sótｸ. Slu™ba musó b̅t pﾖenesena z mósta svïho v̅stupu do mósta svïho pﾖójmu pomocó elektronickïho (zpracovènó a ulo™enó) za-ﾖózenó a prostﾖednictvóm telekomunikaｲnóch prostﾖedkヮ.
The concept of `at a distance' concerns situations in which the service is provided using distance communication techniques, which are therefore characterised by the fact that the parties (i.e. the service provider and the recipient) are not physically and simultaneously present.
̌ slu™by televiznóho vysólènó podle ｲl.
› radio broadcasting services,
1 pósm. a) smｸrnice 89/552/EHS.
› television broadcasting services covered by point (a) of Article 1 of Directive 89/552/EEC.
Je tﾖeba zdヮraznit, ™e zahrnutó slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti je velmi dヮle™it̅m rozþóﾖenóm pヮsobnosti smｸrnice, kterï ji tóm uvedlo v soulad s nov̅m v̅vojem v mezinèrodnóm obchodu.
The expression `by electronic means' means services whose constituent elements are transmitted, conveyed and received within an electronic network.
Pro urｲenó, zda urｲitè ｲinnost spadè do de«niceslu™ebinfor-maｲnó spoleｲnosti, je nejprve tﾖeba ovｸﾖit, zda je dotｲenè ｲin-nost ¶slu™bouƒ v souladu s prèvem Spoleｲenstvó.
The service must be conveyed from its point of departure to its point of arrival by means of electronic (processing and storage) equipment and by tele-communications means.
Tóm je vytvoﾖen prèvnó prvek interak-tivity, kter̅ charakterizuje slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲnosti a stavó je mimo ostatnó slu™by, jejich™ odeslènó zvlèþtnó po™a-davek od pﾖójemce nevy™aduje.
It should be emphasised that the inclusion of Information Soci-ety Services constitutes a very important extension of the scope of the Directive which has brought it in line with new developments in international commerce.
Pro tento ÿｲel stanovó ｲlènek 1, ™e smｸrnice se nevztahuje na slu™by rozhlasovïho nebo televiznóho vysólènó, kterï je pﾖedmｸtem smｸrnice 89/552/
To determine wheth-er an activity comes within the d e « n i t i o n o f I n f o r m a t i o n S o c i - e t y services, it is «rstnecessarytoverifywhethertheactivityinquestion constitutes a `service' in accordance with Community law.
Pﾖókladem slu™eb, kterï jsou pﾖedmｸtem smｸrnice, jsou obecnï informaｲnó slu™by poskytovanï online (noviny, databèze apod.), ｲinnosti dèlkovïho sledovènó, interaktivnó nakupovènó na dèl-ku, elektronickè poþta, rezervace letenek online, odbornï slu™-by online (pﾖóstup do databèzó, diagnostika apod.).
For this reason, Ar-ticle 1 s p e c i « e s t h a t t h e D i r e c t i v e d o e s n o t a p p l y t o r a d i o b r o a d - c a s t i n g services or to television broadcasting services covered by Directive 89/552/EEC (as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, the `Television without Frontiers' Directive).
Podle precedenｲnóho prèva Soudnóho dvora znamenè po-jem ¶slu™byƒ slu™bu za normèlnóch okolnostó poskytovanou za ÿhradu.
According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, `services' means a service provided normally for remuneration.
Soudnó dvヮr stanovil, ™e ¶podstatn̅ rys ÿhrady [„] spoｲóvè ve skuteｲnosti, ™e znamenè odmｸnu za dotｲe-nou slu™buƒ (10).
The Court of Justice has stipulated that the `essential characteristic of re-muneration [„] lies in the fact that it constitutes consideration for the service in question'.
Charakteristika tohoto typu v ｲinnostech, kterï stèt podnikè bez nèroku na odmｸnu v rèmci sv̅ch pra-vomocó, zvlèþtｸ v socièlnó, kulturnó, vzdｸlèvacó a prèvnó ob-lasti, chybó.
Such a characteristic is lacking in the activities the State undertakes without consideration with-
) Smｸrnice z 30. ｲervna 1997, àﾖ. vｸst. L 202, 30.7.1997, str. 60.
23.Directive of 30 June 1997, OJ L 202, 30.7.1997, p. 60.
(13) V dosud nepublikovanïm rozhodnutó v pﾖópadu ¶Mediakabelƒ z 2. ｲervna 2005, Pﾖópad C-89/04, Soudnó dvヮr potvrdil, ™e ｲasovï video na ™èdost nenó slu™bou informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, proto™e se neposkytuje na individuèlnó ™èdost pﾖójemce slu™eb.
In the `Mediakabel' judgment of 2 June 2005, Case C-89/04, not yet published, the Court of Justice has c o n « r mffe d t h a t n e a r v i d e o o n d e m a n d i s n o t a n I n f o r m a - t i o n Society service since it is not provided at the individual request of a recepient of services.