natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opｸtovnｸ ™èdè, aby bylo vyvinuto veþkerï ÿsiló, aby byli evropþtó obｲanï jasnｸ a objektivnｸ informovèni o obsahu àstavy; vyz̅vè v tïto souvislosti evropskï instituce a ｲlenskï stèty, aby pﾖi seznamovènó obｲanヮ s textem àstavy (aﾝ ji™ s pln̅m znｸnóm nebo se shrnutóm jejóch ustanovenó) jednoznaｲnｸ rozliþovaly prvky, kterï ji™ plató podle stèvajócóch Smluv, a novè ustanovenó, kterè pﾖinèþó àstava, a to jak v zèjmu pouｲenó obｲanヮ, tak v zèjmu vyjasnｸnó obsahu diskusó; vyz̅vè je takï k tomu, aby uznaly ÿlohu, kterou hrajó v diskusóch o rati«kaciàstavy organizace obｲanskï spoleｲnosti, a aby tｸmto organizacóm umo™nily zóskat dostateｲnou podporu pro to, aby mohly do tｸchto
Reiterates its request that all possible e.ortsbedeployedinordertoinform European citizens clearly and objectively about the content of the Constitution; therefore invites the European institutions and the Member States, when distributing the text of the constitutional Treaty to citizens (in unabridged or summary versions), to make a clear distinction between the elements already in force in the existing treaties and new provisions introduced by the Constitution, with a view to educating the public and informing the debate; invites them also to recognise the role of civil society organisations within the rati«cationdebatesandtomakeavailablesu/cientsupportto enable such organisations to engage their constituencies in these debates across the EU in order to promote the active involvement of citizens in the discussions on rati«cation; o o o
EVROPSKä PARLAMENT SE VYSLOVUJE K EVROPSKÏ à S T A V V diskusó v celï EU zapojit i svï pﾖóznivce v zèjmu aktivnó ÿｲasti obｲanヮ na diskusóch o rati«kaciàstavy; oo o
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT`S OPINION ON THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION
povｸﾖuje pﾖedsedu Parlamentu, aby pﾖedal toto usnesenó spolu se zprèvou V̅boru pro ÿstavnó zèle™itosti vnitrostètnóm parlamentヮm ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ, Radｸ, Komisi a b̅val̅m ｲlenヮm Evropskïho konventu a aby zajistil, ™e oddｸlenó Parlamentu, a zejmïna jeho informaｲnó kancelèﾖe, budou podèvat podrobnï informace o àstavｸ a o postoji Parlamentu k àstavｸ.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Constitutional A.airstothenationalparliamentsof the Member States, the Council, the Commission and the former Members of the European Convention, and to ensure that Parliament's services, including its Information O/ces,provideample information about the Constitution and Parliament's position on it.
Zasedènó Evropskï rady v Laekenu, Laekenskï prohlèþenó o budoucnosti Unie, SN 273/01, 15.12.2001.
OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p.1.Laeken European Council, Laeken declaration on the future of the Union, SN 273/01, 15.12.2001.
Usnesenó ze dne 14.2.1984 o nèvrhu Smlouvy o zalo™enó Evropskï unie - àﾖ. vｸst. C 77, 19.3.1984, s.
Resolution of 14.2.1984 on the draft Treaty establishing the European Union (OJ C 77, 19.3.1984, p. 5, rapporteur: Altiero Spinelli, 1-1200/1983).
Usnesenó ze dne 11.7.1990 o smｸrech Evropskïho parlamentu t̅kajócóch se nèvrhu àstavy pro Evropskou unii (àﾖ. vｸst. C 231, 17.9.1990, s.
Resolution of 11.7.1990 on the European Parliament's guidelines for a draft constitution for the European Union (OJ C 231, 17.9.1990, p. 91, rapporteur: Emilio Colombo, A3-0165/1990).
Usnesenó ze dne 12.12.1990 o ÿstavnóch zèkladech Evropskï unie - àﾖ. vｸst. C 19, 28.1.1991, s.
Resolution of 12.12.1990 on the constitutional basis of European Union (OJ C 19, 28.1.1991, p. 65, rapporteur: Emilio Colombo, A3-0301/1990).
Usnesenó ze dne 10.2.1994 o àstavｸ Evropskï unie - àﾖ. vｸst. C 61, 28.2.1994, s.
Resolution of 10.2.1994 on the Constitution of the European Union (OJ C 61, 28.2.1994, p. 155, rapporteur: Fernand Herman, A3-0064/1994).
Usnesenó ze dne 25.10.2000 o zaｲlenｸnó smluv do àstavy - àﾖ. vｸst. C 197, 12.7.2001, s.
Resolution of 25.10.2000 on the constitutionalisation of the Treaties (OJ C 197, 12.7.2001, p. 186, rapporteur: Olivier Duhamel, A5-0289/2000).
Usnesenó ze dne 14.3.1990 o Mezivlèdnó konferenci v rèmci strategie Evropskïho parlamentu pro Evropskou unii - àﾖ. vｸst. C 96, 17.4.1990, s.
Resolution of 14.3.1990 on the Intergovernmental Conference in the context of Parliament's strategy for European Union (OJ C 96, 17.4.1990, p.
114., zpravodaj: David Martin; A3-0047/1990;
114, rapporteur: David Martin, A3-0047/1990).
Usnesenó ze dne 11.7.1990 o Mezivlèdnó konferenci v rèmci strategie Evropskïho parlamentu pro Evropskou unii - àﾖ. vｸst. C 231, 17.9.1990, s.
Resolution of 11.7.1990 on the Intergovernmental Conference in the context of Parliament's strategy for European Union (OJ C 231, 17.9.1990, p.
97., zpravodaj: David Martin; A3-166/1990;
97, rapporteur: David Martin, A3-0166/1990).
Usnesenó ze dne 22.11.1990 o Mezivlèdnó konferenci v rèmci strategie Evropskïho parlamentu pro Evropskou unii - àﾖ. vｸst. C 324, 24.12.1990, s.
Resolution of 22.11.1990 on the Intergovernmental Conferences in the context of Parliament's strategy for European Union (OJ C 324, 24.12.1990, p.
219., zpravodaj: David Martin; A3-270/1990;
219, rapporteur: David Martin, A3-0270/1990).
Usnesenó ze dne 22.11.1990 obsahujócó stanovisko EP ke svolènó Mezivlèdnó konference o hospodèﾖskï a mｸnovï unii a politickï unii - àﾖ. vｸst. C 324, 24.12.1990, s.
Resolution of 22.11.1990 embodying Parliament's opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conferences on Economic and Monetary Union and on Political Union (OJ C 324, 24.12.1990, p.
238., zpravodaj: David Martin, A3-281/1990;
238, rapporteur: David Martin, A3-0281/1990).
56, zpravodajovï: Jean-Louis Bourlanges a David Martin; A4-102/1995;
56. rapporteurs: Jean-Louis Bourlanges and David Martin, A4-0102/1995).
Usnesenó ze dne 13.3.1996 obsahujócó (i) stanovisko Evropskïho parlamentu ke svolènó Mezivlèdnó konference, (ii) hodnocenó prèce re‹exnó skupiny a stanovenó politick̅ch priorit Evropskïho parlamentu
Resolution of 13.3.1996 embodying (i) Parliament's opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference, and (ii) an evaluation of the work of the R e ‹ e c t i on G r o up and a d e « n i t i on of the po l i t i c a l p r i o r i t i e s of the European Parliament with a view to the Intergovernmental Conference (OJ C 96, 1.4.1996, p.
77, zpravodajovï : Raymonde Dury a Hanja Maij-Weggen; A4-0068/1996;
77, rapporteurs : Raymonde Dury and Hanja Maij-Weggen, A4-0068/1996).
Usnesenó ze dne 18.11.1999 o pﾖópravｸ reformy smluv a o nèsledujócó Mezivlèdnó konferenci › àﾖ. vｸst. C 189, 7.7.2000, s.
Resolution of 18.11.1999 on the preparation of the reform of the Treaties and the next Intergovernmental Conference (OJ C 189, 7.7.2000, p. 222, rapporteurs: Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos and Jo Leinen, A5-0058/1999).
Usnesenó ze dne 3.2.2000 o svolènó Mezivlèdnó konference›àﾖ. vｸst. C 309, 27.10.2000, s.
Resolution of 3.2.2000 on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (OJ C 309, 27.10.2000, p. 85, rapporteurs: Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos and Jo Leinen, A5-0018/2000).
Usnesenó ze dne 16.3.2000 o vypracovènó Charty zèkladnóch prèv Evropskï unie › àﾖ. vｸst.
Resolution of 16.3.2000 on the drafting of a European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (OJ C 377, 29.12.2000, p.
C 377, 29.12.2000, s.329, zpravodajovï: Andrew D u . a J o h a n n e s V o g g e n h u b e r , A 5 - 0 0 6 4 / 2 0 0 0 .
329, rapporteurs: Andrew D u . and Jo h a n n e s V o g g en h u b e r , A 5 - 0 0 6 4 / 2 0 0 0 ) .
Usnesenó ze dne 13.4.2000 o nèvrzóch Evropskïho parlamentu pro Mezivlèdnó konferenci › àﾖ. vｸst. C 40, 7.2.2001, s.
Resolution of 13.4.2000 containing the European Parliament's proposals for the Intergovernmental Conference (OJ C 40, 7.2.2001, p. 409, rapporteurs: Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos and Jo Leinen, A5-0086/2000).
Usnesenó ze dne 16.1.1986 o postoji Evropskïho parlamentu k Jednotnïmu aktu, kter̅ schvèlila ve dnech 16. a 17. prosince 1985 Mezivlèdnó konference ›àﾖ. vｸst. C 36, 17.2.1986, s.
Resolution of 16.1.1986 on the position of the European Parliament on the Single Act approved by the Intergovernmental Conference on 16 and 17 December 1985 (OJ C 36, 17.2.1986, p. 144, rapporteur: Altiero Spinelli, A2-0199/1985).
Usnesenó ze dne 11.12.1986 o Jednotnïm evropskïm aktu - àﾖ. vｸst. C 07, 12.1.1987, s.
Resolution of 11.12.1986 on the Single European Act (OJ C 7, 12.1.1987, p. 105, rapporteur: Luis Planas Puchades, A2-0169/1986).
Usnesenó ze dne 7.4.1992 o v̅sledcóch Mezivlèdnó konference - àﾖ. vｸst. C 125, 18.5.1992, s.
Resolution of 7.4.1992 on the results of the Intergovernmental Conferences (OJ C 125, 18.5.1992, p.
81., zpravodajovï: David Martin, Fernand Herman; A3-0123/1992;
81, rapporteurs: David Martin and Fernand Herman, A3-0123/1992).
Usnesenó ze dne 19.11.1997 o Amsterdamskï smlouvｸ - àﾖ. vｸst. C 371, 8.12.1997, s.
Resolution of 19.11.1997 on the Amsterdam Treaty (OJ C 371, 8.12.1997, p. 99, rapporteurs: I÷igo Mïndez de Vigo and Dimitris Tsatsos, A4-0347/1997).
Usnesenó ze dne 31.5.2001 o Niceskï smlouvｸ a o budoucnosti Evropskï unie - àﾖ. vｸst. C 47 E, 21.2.2002, s.
Resolution of 31.5.2001 on the Treaty of Nice and the future of the European Union (OJ C 47 E, 21.2.2002, p. 108, rapporteurs: I÷igo Mïndez de Vigo and Antùnio Josï Seguro, A5-0168/2001).
Usnesenó ze dne 29.11.2001 o procesu vytvèﾖenó àstavy a o budoucnosti Unie - àﾖ. vｸst. C 153 E, 27.6.2002, s.
Resolution of 29.11.2001 on the constitutional process and the future of the Union (OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p. 310, rapporteurs: Jo Leinen and I÷igo Mïndez de Vigo, A5-0368/2001).
255, zpravodajovï: Josï Maróa Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado a Dimitris Tsatsos, A5-0299/2003 ;
255, rapporteurs: Josï Maróa Gil-Robles Gil-Delgado and Dimitris Tsatsos, A5-0299/2003).
¶Nejsem zastèncem ｲast̅ch zmｸn zèkonヮ a ÿstav, ale zèkony a instituce musejó jót ruku v ruce s v̅vojem lidskïho ducha.
`I am not an advocate of frequent changes in laws and constitutions, but laws and institutions must go hand in hand withthe progress of the human mind.
Ten se stèvè vyvinutｸjþóm a osvócenｸjþóm, dochèzó k nov̅m objevヮm, jsou odhalovèny novï pravdy, mｸnó se chovènó a nèzory, a proto se se zmｸnou okolnostó musejó vyvójet takï instituce, aby dr™ely krok s dobou.
As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered, and manners and opinions change, with change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace withthe times.
Chtót, aby civilizovanè spoleｲnost zachovala systïm vlèdy sv̅ch pﾖedkヮ, je totï™, jako po™adovat, aby mu™ nosil kabèt, kter̅ mu sedｸl jako chlapci.ƒ
We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which «ttedhim when a boy, as civilised society to remain ever under the regime of their ancestors.'
Pﾖed vóce ne™ pヮl stoletóm Schumanova deklarace uvedla do pohybu ambiciùznó podnik, jeho™ cólem bylo sjednotit na zèkladｸ spoleｲnïho projektu Evropany, kteﾖó byli po staletó rozdｸleni bratrovra™edn̅mi kon‹ikty.
More than half a century ago, the Schuman Declaration set in train an ambitious undertaking: that of uniting Europeans, who had been divided for centuries by fratricidal con‹icts,aroundacommonproject.
àspｸch tohoto projektu zèvisel na vyﾖeþenó tﾖech zèkladnóch problïmヮ, kter̅m Evropa po skonｲenó druhï svｸtovï vèlky ｲelila: jak pﾖekonat vnitﾖnó zlo, kterï bylo zèkladnó pﾖóｲinou nejvè™nｸjþóch neþtｸstó, kterè nèþ kontinent postihla, jak znovu zóskat pﾖi ﾖeþenó svｸtov̅ch zèle™itostó mósto v popﾖedó a jak vytvoﾖit hospodèﾖskï podmónky, kterï by byly zèrukou udr™enó stabilnóho demokratickïho systïmu.
Success was dependent on a resolution of the three crucial issues facing Europe at the end of the Second World War: how to overcome the internal demons which were the root cause of the most serious disasters to have a.ectedourcontinent,howtoregaina place at the forefront of world a.airs,andhowtodevelopeconomicconditionswhich would guarantee the survival of a stable democratic order.
Historie poslednóch pｸti desetiletó je kronikou ÿspｸchu. Evropｸ se podaﾖilo upevnit politick̅ systïm zalo™en̅ na principu svobody, plurality a tolerance; dosèhnout usmóﾖenó zemó, kterï byly jeþtｸ donedèvna nepﾖèteli, a tóm zahèjit nejdelþó obdobó móru v modernóch dｸjinèch; zajistit Evropanヮm vysokou ÿroveﾏ materièlnóho blahobytu a socièlnóho pokroku; pﾖispｸt k odstranｸnó ™eleznï opony, kterè oddｸlovala Evropu svobodn̅ch od Evropy utiskovan̅ch.
The history of the last «vedecadesisthechronicleofasuccess.Europehasmanagedto consolidate a political system based on the principles of freedom, pluralism and tolerance; has reconciled countries which had been enemies only just before, ushering in the longest period of peace in modern times; has secured for Europeans high levels of material well-being and social progress; has helped to bring about the dismantling of the Iron Curtain which divided the Europe of the free from the Europe of the oppressed.
Vþechny tyto ÿspｸchy procesu evropskï integrace nès nesmｸjó vïst k zapomenutó skuteｲn̅ch cólヮ: zabrènit existenci nacionalistick̅ch krutostó, skuteｲnï rakoviny modernó Evropy, v souｲasnosti; brènit demokracii jako systïm, kter̅ mヮ™e usmｸrﾏovat rozdólnï nèzory v pluralitnó spoleｲnosti; a dèt Evropｸ mocn̅ a vlivn̅ hlas na obranu jejóch myþlenek, hodnot a zèjmヮ.
All these achievements of the European integration process should not lead us to forget its true objectives: making nationalist excesses, the real cancer a . e c t in g m o d e r n E u r op e , a t h in g of the p a s t ; d e f en d in g d e m o c r a c y a s a s y s t e m w h i c h c a n channel divergent opinions in a pluralist society; and giving Europe a strong, in‹uentialvoicetodefenditsideas,itsvaluesanditsinterests.
Evropa vþak nesmó usnout na vavﾖónech: musó se zab̅vat nov̅mi ÿkoly, kterï pﾖed nó na poｲètku 21. stoletó stojó, tj. ÿlohou Unie v mezinèrodnó politice, globalizacó, rozþóﾖenóm Unie, eurem, vnitﾖnó a vnｸjþó bezpeｲnostó na naþem kontinentu, terorizmem, migraｲnómi vlnami, vzdｸlèvènóm, technick̅m pokrokem, rasizmem, xenofobió nebo socièlnóm vylouｲenóm.
However, Europe must not rest on its laurels: it must deal withthe new challenges facing it at the start of the 21st century, i.e. the Union's role in international politics, globalisation, enlargement, the euro, the internal and external security of our continent, terrorism, migratory ‹ows,education,technologicalprogress,racism,xenophobia or social exclusion.
Od zalo™enó prvnóho Evropskïho spoleｲenstvó (Uhló a ocel: Paﾖó™skè smlouva ze dne
Since the « r s t European Cffo m mstu n i t y ( Cffo a l and S t e e l : P a r iffs Treaty of 1 8 A p r i l 1 9 5 1 1 ) , which brought together six Western European countries2, was established, the
Od tï doby, co v roce 1979 probｸhly vþeobecnï volby do Evropskïho parlamentu, Parlament vytrvale usiloval o demokratizaci a vｸtþó efektivitu a transparentnost ｲinnosti budoucó Evropskï unie.
Ever since the « r s t European e l e c t i on s b y u n i v e r s a l s u . r a g e in 1 9 7 9 , P a r l i a m en t h a s consistently sought to democratise and make more e.ectiveandtransparenttheworkings of what was to become the European Union.
Pﾖijetóm prvnóho nèvrhu Smlouvy o Evropskï unii (znèmïho podle zpravodaje jako ¶Spinellihoƒ nèvrh) dne 14. ÿnora 1984 Parlament zahèjil reformnó proces, kter̅ pokraｲoval nèsledujócóch 20 let a vedl k nèvrhu
By adopting, on 14 February 1984, the « r s t d r a f t Treaty e s t a b l iffs h in g the European Union ( k n o w n a s the ` S p in e l l i ' d r a f t , after its rapporteur), Parliament initiated a reform process which was to continue for the following 20 years and lead to the drafting of the Single European Act5, the
Jednotnïho evropskïho aktu5, Maastrichtskï s m l o u v y N i c e s k ï smlouvy8 a nynó Smlouvy o àstavｸ pro Evropu9.
Maastricht Treaty6, the Treaty of Amsterdamestablishing a Constitution for Europe9.
Ve vþech fèzóch byl Parlament spolu s V̅borem pro institucionèlnó zèle™itosti, kter̅ se v roce 1999 stal V̅borem pro ÿstavnó zèle™itosti, hnacó silou a aktivnｸ se ÿｲastnil pﾖópravn̅ch rozhovorヮ a posuzoval v̅sledky rヮzn̅ch mezivlèdnóch konferencó (IGC)10.
At each stage, withthe Committee on Institutional A . a i r s , w h i c h in 1 9 9 9 b e c a m e the Cffo m m i t t e e on Constitutional A.airs,providingthedrivingforce,Parliamentplayedan active part in the preparatory talks and assessed the outcome of the various Intergovernmental Conferences (IGCs)10.
Ji™ od zaｲètku tohoto procesu Parlament hèjil vyjasnｸnó a posólenó ÿstavnóho zèkladu Evropskï unie, potﾖebu, kterè se stèvala stèle akutnｸjþó pod tlakem postupnïho rozþiﾖovènó, kterï mohlo ohrozit politickou dimenzi integraｲnóho procesu.
Right from the start of this process, it advocated clarifying and enhancing the constitutional basis for the European Union, a need which became more and more acute under the pressure of successive enlargements, given their capacity to jeopardise the political dimension of the integration process.
V tïto souvislosti sledoval Evropsk̅ parlament tﾖi samostatnï, ale souvisejócó cóle:
Three distinct but related objectives have been pursued by Parliament to this end:
Za prvï se sna™il vyjasnit a pokud to bylo nutnï posólit pravomoci a odpovｸdnost samotnï Evropskï unie.
First, it has sought to clarify and where necessary strengthen the competences and responsibilities of the European Union itself.
Vytrvale prosazoval, ™e pravomoci mè Unie zóskat a vykonèvat na zèkladｸ ¶zèsady subsidiarityƒ, tj. mｸla by jednat tehdy › ale pouze tehdy › kdy™ lze ÿｲinnｸji pヮsobit na ÿrovni spoleｲnï politiky ne™ zèsahy jednotliv̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
Parliament has consistently argued that powers should be attributed to, and exercised by, the Union on the basis of the `principle of subsidiarity', i.e. it should exercise those responsibilities - but only those responsibilities - that can be carried out more e.ectivelybycommonpoliciesthanbythe Member States acting separately.
Za druhï Parlament prosazoval, aby pravomoci na ÿrovni EU byly vykonèvèny ÿｲinnｸji. Kritizoval pﾖedevþóm postup jednomyslnosti v Radｸ a argumentoval tóm, ™e pokud bylo schvèleno spoleｲnï provèdｸnó politiky, nedèvè smysl udｸlovat kterïmukoli ze ｲlenヮ Unie pravomoc zablokovat rozhodnutó.
Second, it has argued that responsibilities exercised at European level should be carried out more e.ectively.Parliamentwasparticularlycriticalofthepracticeofunanimityinthe Council, arguing that, where it has been agreed to run a policy jointly, it makes no sense to give a blocking power to each of the component States of the Union.
Hèjil takï posólenó role Komise pﾖi provèdｸnó politik, pokud byly jednou schvèleny a jsou pﾖedmｸtem ﾖèdnïho dohledu a kontroly.
It has also pleaded for a stronger role to be given to the Commission in carrying out policies once they have been agreed, subject to proper scrutiny and control.
Za tﾖetó obhajoval lepþó demokratickou kontrolu a odpovｸdnost na ÿrovni EU.
Third, it has made the case for better democratic control and accountability at European level.
Ty pravomoci, kterï nèrodnó parlamenty rati«kacó Smluv pﾖenechaly Unii, by nemｸly b̅t uskuteｲﾏovèny pouze Radou samotnou (tj. ministry jednotliv̅ch zemó). àbytek pravomocó parlamentヮ na nèrodnó ÿrovni by mｸl b̅t kompenzovèn nèrヮstem pravomocó Evropskïho parlamentu.
Those responsibilities which national parliaments, in ratifying the Treaties, have transferred to the Union should not be exercised by the Council (i.e.
10 v̅þe), kterï znamenalo skuteｲn̅ zaｲètek procesu politickï revize, kter̅ na podnｸt nｸmeckïho pﾖedsednictvó v Radｸ vyvrcholil v roce 1999 vytvoﾖenóm vzoru ÿstavy, poprvï pou™itïm v souvislosti s nèvrhem Charty zèkladnóch prèv Evropskï unie.
In the light of the mixed and clearly inadequate results achieved by the Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice, when set against the challenge posed by the doubling in the number of Member States, but also that of the further deepening of the Union, it became more and more apparent that the established method of revising the Treaties was no longer able to provide genuine responses to the issues raised by the development of Europe.
Signatèﾖi Niceskï smlouvy, vｸdomi si do nedokonalostó tïto smlouvy, pﾖipojili jeþtｸ prohlèþenó ｲ.
Parliament had already reached that conclusion, and outlined it clearly, in its resolution of 19 November 1997 (based on the report by Ó÷igo Mïndez de Vigo and Dimitris Tsatsos, see footnote 10 above) which marked the real starting point of the political review process which was to culminate, in 1999, in the establishment, at the instigation of the German Council Presidency, of the Convention model, one «rstemployed in connection withthe drafting of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
23 ¶o budoucnosti Unieƒ11, kterï otevórè cestu k novï reformｸ Smluv, kterè byla pヮvodnｸ plènovèna na rok 2004.
The signatories to the Treaty of Nice, being aware of its imperfections, in fact annexed to it a Declaration No 23 `on the future of the Union'11 which paved the way for further reform of the treaties, originally scheduled for 2004.
Tato reforma mｸla b̅t pﾖipravena na zèkladｸ ¶þirokï diskuse vþech zÿｲastnｸn̅ch stran: zèstupcヮ nèrodnóch parlamentヮ a celï veﾖejnosti (...) zèstupcヮ obｲanskï spoleｲnosti atd.ƒ, kterè mｸla probóhat v roce 2001 a mｸla vïst k pﾖijetó prohlèþenó ¶obsahujócóho vhodnï podnｸty k pokraｲovènó tohoto procesuƒ na zasedènó Evropskï rady v Laeken.
This reform was to be prepared for by `wide-ranging discussions with all interested parties: representatives of national parliaments and all those re‹ectingpublicopinion(...)representativesofcivilsociety,etc.', which was to take place in 2001 with a view to the adoption of a declaration `containing appropriate initiatives for the continuation of this process' at the European Council in Laeken.
Jeho otevﾖen̅ a transparentnó charakter a vysokè ÿroveﾏ v̅mｸny nèzorヮ takï pﾖispｸly k dosa™enó konsenzu, na jeho™ poｲètku byla skuteｲnost, ™e ka™d̅ mｸl mo™nost vyjèdﾖit svヮj nèzor a podrobnｸ se seznèmit s nèzory ostatnóch.
Parliament, for its part, after having sought to work in partnership withthe the national parliaments, during the preparations for successive IGCs12
Evropskè rada na svïm zasedènó v Laeken ve dnech 14. a 15. prosince 2001 pﾖijala ¶Laekenskï prohlèþenó o budoucnosti Evropskï unieƒ15 a navèzala na v̅þe uveden̅ podnｸt tóm, ™e vymezila zpヮsoby organizace a ｲinnosti Konventu a zejmïna urｲila podmónky jeho mandètu a otèzky, kterï na nｸm budou pﾖedlo™eny k diskusi. Tak byl Konvent o budoucnosti Evropy, jemu™ pﾖedsedal Valïry Giscard d'Estaing a jeho™ móstopﾖedsedy byli Giuliano Amato a Jean-Luc Dehaene, povｸﾖen ÿkolem vypracovat pﾖedbｸ™n̅ nèvrh àstavy jako zèklad pro prèci nèslednï mezivlèdnó konference.
, was the «rstto propose13, on the basis of the precedent set when the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union was drawn up14, the convening of a Convention comprising representatives of the Heads of State and Government of the Member States, the national parliaments and the European Parliament and the Commission and withthe involvement, as full members, of representatives of the governments and parliaments of the applicant States.
V̅sledek, kterïho Konvent dosèhl, potvrdil, ™e v̅bｸr tohoto zpヮsobu byl moudr̅, vzhledem k tomu, ™e po 16 mｸsócóch prèce se Konventu podaﾖilo pﾖedlo™it text vznikl̅ na zèkladｸ dohody a formovan̅ intenzivnómi diskusemi, kterï ｲerpaly takï z bezprostﾖednóho dialogu s obｲanskou spoleｲnostó.
The Convention on the Charter of Fundamental Rights demonstrated that a body of this kind was able to prepare a draft text likely to secure the approval of the Heads of State or Government.
, z nｸho™ bylo mezivlèdnó konferencó pozmｸnｸno jen velmi mèlo ustanovenó. Na tïto mezivlèdnó konferenci byl Parlament poprvï plnｸ zapojen do samotnïho jednènó, a to prostﾖednictvóm svïho pﾖedsedy Pata Coxe a jeho dvou
The open and transparent nature of the Convention and the quality of its debates had also facilitated e.ortstoachieveaconsensusbygivingevery representative the opportunity, «rstofall,toexpresshisorherownviews,and,subsequently, to understand those of the other representatives.
EVROPSKä PARLAMENT SE VYSLOVUJE K EVROPSKÏ à S T A V V zèstupcヮ Ónigo Mïndeze de Viga, kterïho pozdｸji nahradil Elmar Brok, a Klause Hênsche.
A t t h a t I G C , for the « r s t t i m eP a r l i a m en t w a s f u l l y involved in the proceedings, in the persons of its President, Pat Cox, and its two representatives, Ó÷igo Mïndez de Vigo, subsequently replaced by Elmar Brok, and Klaus Hênsch.