natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES naopak zavèdó pro ｲlenskï stèty novou povinnost t̅kajócó se nèvrhu technic-kïho pﾖedpisu, kter̅ se sna™ó omezit uvedenó chemickï lètky, pﾖópravku nebo v̅robku na trh nebo jejich pou™óvanó z dヮvodu ochrany veﾖejnïho zdravó, ochrany spotﾖebitele a ™ivotnóho prostﾖedó (porovnej ｲtvrt̅ pododstavec ｲlènku 8 odst. 1).
With the same concern for e f - « c i e n c y , Mffe mb e r S t a t e s a r e e x e m p t f r o m t h e o b l i g a t i o n t o s e n d t h e Commission the text of the basic legislative and regulatory provisions concerning a draft technical regulation, if this text has already been sent with a prior communication.
Kromｸ povinnosti oznèmit text nèvrhu a dヮvody pro jeho zave-denó, musó ｲlenskï stèty Komisi takï poskytnout doplﾏujócó do-kumentaci.
This is the case, for example, when a draft technical regulation which has already been noti«edmustbenoti«edagainbecauseithasbeensigni«-cantly amended (see the third subparagraph of Article 8(1)).
Je tﾖeba zdヮraznit, ™e oznèmenó nenó nutnï v pﾖópadｸ, kdy byla znｸnó ustanovenó nèvrhu, kter̅ ji™ plató, jenom jednoduþe upra-vena (napﾖ. v pﾖópadｸ slouｲenó ustanovenó) a tyto ÿpravy nema-jó ™èdn̅ prèvnó ÿｲinek, a samozﾖejmｸ v pﾖópadech uveden̅ch v ｲlènku 10 (napﾖ. zaｲlenｸnó poznèmek do textu, kterï Komise uvedla ve svïm podrobnïm stanovisku › viz dèle).
New noti«cation. Member States must notify again a draft which has already been examined under the provisions of Di-rective 98/34/EC, if they have made signi«cantamendmentstothe text in the meantime.
Jakmile jó byl oznèmen nov̅ nèvrh nèrodnóho technickïho pﾖedpisu, musó Komise pﾖedat vþechny informace, kterï jó byly
The third subparagraph of Article 8(1) speci«esthatamend-ments made to the text are considered to be signi«cantifthey
Aby mohly ｲlenskï stèty tuto povinnost splnit, musó poslat pﾖe-hled vþech relevantnóch ÿdajヮ o pﾖósluþnï lètce, pﾖópravku nebo v̅robku a o znèm̅ch a dostupn̅ch nèhra™kèch, nebo odkazy na nｸ, a v̅sledky anal̅zy rizik.
Thus, for example, when a draft national technical regulation lays down s p e c i « c a t i o n s f o r t h e l a b e l l i n g o f f o o d s tffu . s w h i c h e x c e e d t h e r e q u i r e mffe n t s o f D i r e c t i v e 2 0 0 0/ 1 3 / E C , the procedure referred to in Article 19 of that Directive shall apply.
(50) Smｸrnice Evropskïho parlamentu a Rady 94/62/ES z 20. prosince 1994 o obalech a obalov̅ch odpadech (àﾖ. vｸst. L 365, 31.12.1994, str. 10) ve znｸnó smｸrnice 2004/12/ES z 11. ÿnora 2004 (àﾖ. vｸst. L 47, 18.2.2004, str. 26).
Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p.
(51) Zèkonnè naﾖózenó t̅kajócó se vyhodnocovènó a ﾖózenó rizik existujócóch lètek (àﾖ. vｸst. L 84, 5.4.1993, str. 1) ve znｸnó naﾖózenó ｲ. 1882/2003 (àﾖ. vｸst. L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).
Regulation on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances (OJ L 84, 5.4.1993, p.
(52) Smｸrnice Rady 67/548/EHS z 27. ｲervna 1967 o pﾖibli™ovènó zèkonヮ, zèkonn̅ch naﾖózenó a sprèvnóch ustanovenó t̅kajócóch se klasi«kace,balenóaoznaｲovènónebezpeｲn̅ch lètek, àﾖ. vｸst. L 196, 16.8.1967, str. 1.
Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classi«cation,packagingand labelling of dangerous substances, OJ 196, 16.8.1967, p. 10.
oznamujócóm ｲlensk̅m stètem v oznèmenó sdｸleny, ostatnóm ｲlensk̅m stètヮm (nèvrh pﾖedpisu je takï souｲasnｸ poslèn vþem odborヮm Komise, kter̅ch by se mohl ve smyslu jejich speci«c-k̅ch nebo horizontèlnóch odpovｸdnostó t̅kat).
have the e.ectofalteringitsscope,shorteningthetimetableoriginally envisaged for implementation, adding speci«cationsor requirements, or making the latter more restrictive.
nèvrhy pﾖedpisヮ t̅kajó (telekomunikace, strojórenstvó, potravi-nèﾖskï a zemｸdｸlskï v̅robky, doprava, stavebnictvó, slu™by in-formaｲnó spoleｲnosti atd.), je generèlnó ﾖeditelstvó pro podnikè-nó a prヮmysl (DG ENTR) (55).
the internal market the opportunity to express their views on draft national legislation (except where the notifying Member State expressly requests, with justi«cation,thattheinformationcommunicated to the Commission should exceptionally be treated as con«dentialwithregardtoeconomicoperators).
Informace, kterï se prostﾖednictvóm postupu dostèvajó do obｸ-hu, Komise pﾖedèvè dèl vþem ｲlensk̅m stètヮm nejprve v jazyce oznamujócóho ｲlenskïho stètu a potom jako pﾖeklad do vþech nebo nｸkter̅ch o«cièlnóchjazykヮUnie.
These are committees which cover sectoral directives, like the TCAM Committee, established by Directive 1999/5/ECfor the telecommunications sector or the `Recreational Craft Committee', established by Directive 94/25/EC for the recrea-tional craft sector.
Oznèmenï nèvrhy a jejich pﾖeklady Komise rovnｸ™ uvèdó na svï webovï strènce, kterè vþem hospodèﾖsk̅m subjektヮm na vnitﾖ-nóm trhu nabózó mo™nost vyjèdﾖit se k nèvrhヮm nèrodnóch pﾖed-pisヮ (s v̅jimkou pﾖópadヮ, kdy si oznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt v̅slov-nｸ pﾖeje, aby se informace obsa™enï v nèvrhu oznamovanïm Komisi pova™ovaly s ohledem na hospodèﾖskï subjekty za dヮ-vｸrnï a aby se s nimi proto tak zachèzelo. Svï pﾖènó musó ozna-mujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt podepﾖót rozumn̅mi dヮvody).
It should be emphasised that noti«cationisnotnecessaryinthe case of a simple restatement of provisions which are al-ready applicable (for example, in the event of consolidation), and which are without added legal e.ectorofcourseinthecases provided for by Article 10 (e.g. integration in the text of remarks made by the Commission in a detailed opinion, see hereinafter).
Smｸrnice obsahuje ustanovenó, kterï Komisi dovoluje pﾖedlo™it nèvrh Stèlïmu v̅boru (viz Kapitola IV) nebo ¶v̅boru, kter̅ za dotyｲnou oblast odpovódèƒ, aby se k nèvrhu vyjèdﾖily.
In practice, the Commission is responsible for administering the procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnical regulations.
V̅bor TCAM zalo™en̅ smｸrnicó 99/5/ES (53)pro oblast teleko-munikacó nebo ¶V̅bor pro zèjmovè ﾖemeslaƒ zalo™en̅ smｸrnicó 94/25/ES (54) pro oblast zèjmov̅ch ﾖemesel.
The whole procedure, including the reac-tions to the noti«edprojects,isbasedonasystemofelectronicdata exchange, transmitted in accordance with a nomenclature set up by the Commission.
V̅sledkem tohoto prヮzkumu mohou b̅t dva rヮznï typy reakcó Komise a ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ (Komise mè navóc dalþó zvlèþtnó mo™-nost: ¶blokovènóƒ nèvrhu jako v̅sledek harmonizaｲnó prèce, o nｸm™ bude ﾖeｲ dèle v poznèmkèch k ｲlènku 9 smｸrnice). Rヮznï reakce, jejich™ ÿｲinek je ÿmｸrn̅ zèva™nosti zjiþtｸnó, jsou:
When the Commission has been noti«edofanewdraftnation-al technical regulation, it must transmit all the information communicated by the notifying Member State to all the other Member States (the draft will simultaneously be sent to all the Commission departments which may be concerned by the no-ti«edregulationasaresultoftheirspeci«corhorizontalre-sponsibilities).
V praxi je za sprèvu a administraci oznamovacóho postupu pro poskytovènó informacó v oblasti technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ odpo-vｸdnè Komise.
This communication of information enables all the Member States to be fully involved in the monitoring procedure laid down by the Directive.
àstﾖednóm móstem pro pﾖójem vþech zprèv, textヮ a oznèmenó sdｸlovan̅ch ｲlensk̅mi stèty, bez ohledu na oblasti, kter̅ch se
The Commission also places the noti«eddraftsandtheirtrans-lations on its Website, which o.ersalltheeconomicoperatorsin
V tomto pﾖópadｸ ani Komise a ani ｲlenskï stèty bｸhem tﾖómｸsóｲ-nó lhヮty nereagujó (56). Na konci tohoto obdobó oznamujócó ｲlen-
The information which is circulated under the procedure is re-communicated by the Commission to all the Member States, « r s t l y i n t h e l a n g u a g e o ft h e n o t i f y i n g Mffe mb e r S t a t e a n d t h e n
53) Smｸrnice 99/5/ES Evropskïho parlamentu a Rady z 9. bﾖezna 1999 vztahujócó se na rozhlasovè a telekomunikaｲnó koncovè zaﾖózenó vｲetnｸ vzèjemnïho uznè-
Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 9 March 1999 relating to radio and telecommunications terminal equipment, including the mutual recognition of their conformity, OJ L 91, 7.4.1999, p.1.
54) Smｸrnice 94/25/ES Evropskïho parlamentu a Rady ze 16. ｲervna 1994 o pﾖibli™ovènó zèkonヮ, zèkonn̅ch naﾖózenó a sprèvnóch ustanovenó ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ t̅ka-
Directive 94/25/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 16 June 1994 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to recreational craft, OJ L 164, 30.6.1994, p.
15 (ve znｸnó smｸrnice 2003/44/ES ze 16. ｲervna 2003, àﾖ. vｸst. L 214, 26.8.2003, str. 18).
15 (amended by Directive 2003/44/EC of 16 June 2003, OJ L 214, 26.8.2003, p. 18).
sk̅ stèt pﾖijme svヮj nèvrh pﾖedpisu bez dalþóch povinnostó s tóm souvisejócóch.
34/EC, if the regulation as «nallyadoptedshouldprovetobecontrary to the Treaty or to secondary legislation.
Smｸrnice stanovó, ™e ｲlenskï stèty musó vzót obdr™enï pﾖipo-mónky v ÿvahu ¶v co nejvｸtþó móﾖeƒ (ｲlènek 8 odst. 2).
Second stage: possible reactions open to the Commission and the Member States
Plenskï stèty ale obecnｸ berou v ÿvahu pﾖipomónky, kterï obdr™ely.
The Commission and the Member States can send comments or a detailed opinion to the Member State which noti«edthedraft technical regulation.
Toto prèvo vþak nevyluｲuje nèslednï zèsahy ze strany Komise mimo postup podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES, jestli™e se pﾖedpis po svïm koneｲnïm pﾖijetó ukè™e b̅t v rozporu se Smlouvou nebo se sekundèrnó legislativou.
During the three months following the noti«cationofadraft(this period corresponds to the standstill period referred to in Article 9(1)), the Commission and the Member States examine the n o t i « e d t e x t i n o r d e r t o a s c e r t a i n i t s c o m p a t i b i l i t y w i t h C o m mstu n i t y law, particularly with Articles 28 and 30, 43 and 49 of the Treaty, but also with the sectoral Directives involved, and to reach a decision, where necessary, on its consistency with the concerned provisions.
Komise a ｲlenskï stèty mohou poslat pﾖipomónky nebo po-drobnï stanovisko tomu ｲlenskïmu stètu, kter̅ nèvrh technic-kïho pﾖedpisu oznèmil.
They can also give an overall assessment of the measure, hav-ing regard to the general principles of Community law and policies implemented in this context, or inform the Member State of its future obligations with regard to acts to be adopted on a Community level.
Podrobnè stanoviska (je o nich a jejich dヮsledcóch ﾖeｲ dèle v ｲlènku 9 smｸrnice) Komise nebo ｲlenskï stèty posólajó tehdy, kdy™ majó za to, ™e zam̅þlenï navrhovanï opatﾖenó by mohlo po svïm pﾖijetó vytvoﾖit pﾖekè™ky volnïho pohybu zbo™ó, volnï-ho pohybu slu™eb nebo svobody usazovènó poskytovatelヮ slu-™eb v rèmci vnitﾖnóho trhu.
The results of this evaluation can give rise to two types of reac-tion by the Commission and the Member States (the Commis-sion has, in addition, a speci«coption:`blockage'ofthedraftasa result of harmonisation work, which will be examined below in the comments on Article 9 of the Directive).
Snahou tｸchto podrobn̅ch stanovi-sek je ÿprava navrhovanïho opatﾖenó tak, aby se hned u zrodu odstranily vþechny nèslednï pﾖekè™ky tｸmto svobodèm.
The various reac-tions, whose impact is proportional to the seriousness of the «ndings,areasfollows:
Tyto spornï otèzky se vztahujó na nezèkonnost nèvrhu ve smys-lu prèva Spoleｲenstvó poruþenóm ｲlènku 28, 43 nebo 49 Smlou-vy. Nejｲastｸjþómi poruþenómi tｸchto ustanovenó je, ™e v textu chybó dolo™ka o vzèjemnïm uznèvènó rovnocenn̅ch technic-k̅ch speci«kacónebopravidelproslu™bystanoven̅chjin̅mｲlensk̅m stètem nebo skuteｲnost, ™e nｸkterè z ustanovenó nè-vrhu nejsou ÿmｸrnè sledovanïmu cóli.
Directive 98/34/EC provides, in Article 8 (1) (last subparagraph), that the comments and detailed opinions issued with regard to technical speci«cations,`otherrequirements'orrulesonservic-es linked to «scalor«nancialmeasures,canonlyrelatetoas-pects which may create barriers to the free movement of goods or, in respect of rules on services, the free movement of services or the freedom of establishment of service operators, and not to the « s c a l o r « n a n c i a l s i d e o ft h e mffe a s u r e .
Navóc se podrobnï sta-novisko mヮ™e t̅kat poruþenó harmonizaｲnó smｸrnice, naﾖózenó nebo rozhodnutó Spoleｲenstvó.
T h e Mffe mb e r S t a t e s ' « s c a l po w e r s a r e t h uffs n o tffu n d e r s c r uijt i n y i n t h i s r e s p e c t . T h e d r a ft s concerned also bene«tfromspecialtreatmentwithre-gard to the standstill periods (see Article 10(4): no period is laid down for the adoption of these texts by Member States).
Podrobnï stanovisko nelze za ™èdn̅ch okolnostó zaslat proti takov̅m navrhovan̅m pﾖedpisヮm, kterï zakazujó v̅robu, ale kterï samy o sobｸ netvoﾖó potencièlnó pﾖekè™ku volnïho pohy-bu zbo™ó.
Under the Directive, the notifying Member State has no formal obligation to reply to the comments received. In practice, how-ever, the Member State frequently does so on a voluntary basis and this increases the dialogue.
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES ve svïm ｲlènku 8 odst.
In this case, neither the Commission nor the Member States re-act during the three-month period.
Dotｲenï nèvrhy takï tｸ™ó z v̅hod, kterï s sebou pﾖinèþó zvlèþtnó postup v obdobóch poza-stavenó pracó (viz ｲlènek 10 odst.
At the end of this period, the notifying Member State can adopt its draft regulation, without further obligation.
4): pro pﾖijetó tｸchto textヮ ｲlen-sk̅mi stèty se nestanovó ™èdnï lhヮty.
This right does not, however, exclude subsequent intervention by the Commission, outside the procedure under Directive 98/
Podle smｸrnice nemè oznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt ™èdnou formèlnó povinnost na obdr™enï pﾖipomónky odpovｸdｸt. V praxi vþak to
The Directive stipulates that the Member States must take com-ments into account `as far as possible' (Article 8(2)).
Plenskï stèty musó na podrobnï stanovisko, kterï obdr™ely od Komise nebo jinïho ｲlenskïho stètu, odpovｸdｸt.
Although it is not sent to the notifying Member State, the decision not to follow up the n o t i « c a t i o n i s a f o r m a l d e c i s i o n b y t h e C o m m i s s i o n .
Ve stejnïm pﾖópadｸ mè jak̅koliv neoznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt prèvo v pﾖópa-dｸ, ™e byl oznèmen̅ nèvrh pﾖijat, podat ™èdost o zahèjenó soud-nóho ﾖózenó o poruþenó prèva podle ｲlènku 227 Smlouvy.
same case, a Member State has the right, in the event of adop-tion of the noti«eddraft,toinstitutetheinfringementproceed-ings provided for by Article 227 of the Treaty.
Dヮsledky tïto reakce, kterou mヮ™e pou™ót v̅hradnｸ Komise, jsou popsèny v ｲlènku 9 odst. 3, 4 a 5 smｸrnice.
These detailed opinions seek to ob-tain an amendment to the proposed measure, in order to re-move at source any resulting barriers to such freedoms.
Povinnost dodr™et obdobó pozastavenó pracó
The obligation to observe the standstill periods
Plènek 9 se vztahuje na ｲasov̅ rozvrh uveden̅ v oznèmenó.
These issues relate to the illegality of the draft in terms of Com-munity law, through a breach of Article 28, 43 or 49 of the Trea-ty.
Datum pﾖijetó nèvrhu nèrodnóho technickïho pﾖedpisu oznè-menïho ｲlensk̅m stètem a vþech po™adovan̅ch dokumentヮ Komisó je zaｲètkem obdobó, bｸhem nｸho™ mè dotｲen̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt pﾖósnｸ zakèzèno dotｲen̅ nèvrh pﾖijmout.
The most frequent breaches of these provisions are the ab-sence in the text of a clause of mutual recognition of equivalent technical speci«cationsorofrulesonservicesestablishedbyanother Member State, or the fact that some of the provisions of the draft are disproportionate to the pursued objective.
̌ ani™ jsou dotｲeny odstavce 3, 4 a 5, pﾖijetó jakïhokoli jinïho nè-vrhu technickïho pﾖedpisu o þest mｸsócヮ ode dne, kdy Komise obdr™ó sdｸlenó podle ｲl.
› without prejudice to paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, for six months the adoption of any other draft technical regulation (except for draft rules on services),
Je to obdobó, kterï je pova™ovèno za nezbytnï k tomu, aby mohla Komise a ostatnó ｲlenskï stèty oznèmen̅ nèvrh textu prozkoumat a v pﾖópadｸ potﾖeby na nｸj reagovat (57).
Member States must reply to a detailed opinion addressed to them by the Commission or another Member State.
̌ ani™ jsou dotｲena ustanovenó odstavcヮ 4 a 5, pﾖijetó jakïhokoli nèvrhu pﾖedpisu pro slu™by o ｲtyﾖi mｸsóce ode dne, kdy Komise
Although the Directive does not specify the time allowed for reply, it is nevertheless desirable that a response be made as soon as pos-sible in the interests of e/ciency,preferablyduringthestand-still periods of six or four months, respectively for goods and Information society services.
Kromｸ tohoto obdobó je oznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt povinen dodr-™et dalþó obdobó pozastavenó pracó, jeho™ dïlka se mｸnó podle
from the date of receipt by the Commission of the communica-tion referred to in Article 8(1) if the Commission or another Member State delivers a detailed opinion, within three months of that date, to the e.ectthatthemeasureenvisagedmaycre-ate obstacles to the free movement of goods within the internal market;
57) S v̅jimkou: a) nalïhav̅ch pﾖópadヮ, b) prèvnóch a sprèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ zakazujócóch v̅robu, pokud netvoﾖó pﾖekè™ku volnïmu pohybu zbo™ó (viz
If the Commission considers that the reply to its detailed opin-ion is unsatisfactory, it can use, if the draft is actually adopted, the procedure referred to in Article 226 of the Treaty.
nici, naﾖózenó nebo rozhodnutó v tïto vｸci v souladu s ｲlènkem 189 Smlouvy.
Member States to examine the noti«eddrafttextandtoreactto it if necessary.
povahy textu a typu reakce, kterou obdr™ela. Tﾖeba™e pﾖipo-mónky poslanï oznamujócómu ｲlenskïmu stètu poｲèteｲnó tﾖó-mｸsóｲnó obdobó pozastavenó pracó neprodlu™ujó, neplató totï™ pro podrobnè stanoviska, kterï Komise nebo ostatnó ｲlenskï stèty oznamujócómu ｲlenskïmu stètu poslaly.
by the Commission of the communication referred to in Article 8(1) if the Commission or another Member State delivers a de-tailed opinion, within three months of that date, to the e.ectthat the measure envisaged may create obstacles to the free movement of services or to the freedom of establishment of service operators within the internal market.
1, oznèmó-li Komise do tﾖó mｸsócヮ od tohoto data svï zjiþtｸnó, ™e se nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu t̅kè vｸci, kterè je v pヮsobnosti nèvr-hu smｸrnice, naﾖózenó nebo rozhodnutó pﾖedlo™enïho Radｸ v sou-ladu s ｲlènkem 189 Smlouvy.
Although comments sent to the Member State do not result in an extension of the initial three-month standstill period, the same does not apply to detailed opinions sent by the Commis-sion or the other Member States.
V pﾖópadｸ podrobnïho stanoviska vztahujócóho se na dobrovol-nou dohodu smｸrnice stanovó, ™e ｲlensk̅ stèt musó respektovat obdobó pozastavenó pracó v dïlce ｲtyﾖ mｸsócヮ (ｲlènek 9 odst. 2).
With regard to draft rules on services, detailed opinions from the Commission or Member States may not a.ectanyculturalpolicymeasures, in particular in the audiovisual sphere, which Member States might adopt in accordance with Community law, taking into account of their linguistic diversity, their speci«cnationalandregional characteristics and their cultural heritage.
Je jenom o mｸsóc delþó ne™ poｲèteｲnó obdobó pozastavenó pracó, tak™e ｲlenskï stèty neztrècejó ｲas a mohou vyu™óvat v̅hod opatﾖenó, jejich™ ÿｲinnost je dostaｲujócó alternativou legislativy.
The Member State concerned shall report to the Commission on the action it proposes to take on such detailed opinions. The Com-mission shall comment on this reaction.
Je tﾖeba zdヮraznit, ™e stejnï ¶pravidlo pﾖidanïho mｸsóceƒ plató i v pﾖópadｸ podrobnïho stanoviska t̅kajócóho se nèvrhu pravidel pro slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲnosti.
With respect to rules on services, the Member States concerned shall indicate, where appropriate, the reasons why the detailed opinions cannot be taken into account.
Odstavce 3, 4 a 5 ｲlènku 9 stanovó mnohem delþó obdobó poza-stavenó pracó jako v̅sledek blokovènó uvalenïho Komisó, a to pouze Komisó, po prozkoumènó nèvrhu.
One should point out that the same `additional one-month rule' applies in the event of a detailed opinion concerning draft rules on Information Society services.
Obdobó pozastavenó pracó se prodlu™uje na þest mｸsócヮ pro vþechny ostatnó nèvrhy, ke kter̅m byla vydèna podrobnè sta-noviska.
The standstill period is extended to six months for all other drafts which are the subject of a detailed opinion.
Cólem tïto reakce, jako z ｲasovïho hlediska nejvè™nｸjþóho dヮ-sledku pro ｲlenskï stèty, je zabrènit tomu, aby oznèmen̅ nèvrh nepﾖóznivｸ ovlivnil proces harmonizace legislativy, kter̅ byl za-hèjen na ÿrovni Spoleｲenstvó.
Article 9 relates to the timing involved in noti«cation.Thedateof receipt by the Commission of the draft national technical regulation communicated by a Member State and of all the re-quested documents is the signal for the beginning of a period during which the Member State concerned is strictly obliged not to adopt the draft in question.
Komise mヮ™e blokovat nèvrh nèrodnóho pﾖedpisu ve tﾖech zvlèþtnóch pﾖópadech:
This period is commonly known as the standstill period.
Plensk̅ stèt, jemu™ je takovï stanovisko adresovèno, musó Ko-misi informovat o vþech krocóch, kterï hodlè podniknout (zru-þenó spornïho textu, odヮvodnｸnó jeho zachovènó nebo zmｸny v urｲit̅ch ustanovenóch, aby byly v souladu s pravidly platn̅mi pro vnitﾖnó trh) bez ohledu na to, zda byla autorem Komise a/nebo jin̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt.
A Member State to which such an opinion is addressed must inform the Commission of the actions it intends to take (revo-cation of the disputed text, justi«cationforretainingit,ortheamendment of certain provisions in order to render them com-patible with the rules of the internal market), irrespective of whether another Member State and/or the Commission was the author.
Tento odstavec nespeci«kuje,coznamenè¶ÿmyslƒnavrhnout,n̅br™ se t̅kè ÿmyslu, kter̅ byl v̅slovnｸ vyjèdﾖen napﾖ. uvede-nóm v roｲnóm legislativnóm programu Komise.
The Commission will comment, in turn, on the ac-tions envisaged by the Member State in response to the de-tailed opinion, in order to let the Member State know whether
̌ informuje-li Komise ｲlenskï stèty, ™e ji™ nemè v ÿmyslu navrh-nout nebo pﾖijmout zèvazn̅ prèvnó pﾖedpis Spoleｲenstvó,
Paragraph (3) covers the « r s t c a s e : t h e C o m m i s s i o n a n n o u n c - e s its intention to propose or adopt a directive, regulation or decision (in other words any of the binding Community acts under Article 249 (former Article 189) of the Treaty on the same subject as the text of the draft technical regulation.
V oblasti slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti Komise nemヮ™e po™a-dovat odlo™enó pﾖijetó nèvrhu jednoduþe tóm, ™e oznèmó svヮj ÿmysl navrhnout nebo pﾖijmout zèvazn̅ prèvnó pﾖedpis Spole-ｲenstvó vztahujócó se na pﾖedmｸt textu. Skuteｲnost, ™e je Komi-se v procesu sestavovènó nèvrhu zèkona Spoleｲenstvó, nenó do-stateｲnè k tomu, aby ospravedlnila dvanèctimｸsóｲnó ｲekacó lhヮtu dotｲenïmu ｲlenskïmu stètu.
these measures are suited to eliminate the barriers to the free movement of goods, the free movement of services or the free-dom of establishment of service operators which may have re-sulted from the adoption of the text, or whether the justi«ca-tion given for retaining the text is acceptable.
̌ informuje-li Komise ｲlenskï stèty, ™e svヮj nèvrh nebo zèmｸr vzala zpｸt,
This paragraph does not specify what is meant by `the inten-tion' to propose, but it concerns an intention that has been ex-plicitly expressed, for example through inclusion in the Com-mission's annual legislative programme.
V druhïm pﾖópadｸ (odstavec 4) Komise zjistó, ™e oznèmen̅ nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu se t̅kè zèle™itosti, kterè je pﾖed-mｸtem nèvrhu smｸrnice, naﾖózenó nebo rozhodnutó pﾖedklèda-nïho Radｸ.
With the exclusion of draft rules relating to services, Member States shall postpone the adoption of a draft technical regulation for 12 months from the date of receipt by the Commission of the communication referred to in Article 8 (1) if, within the three months following that date, the Commission announces its inten-tion of proposing or adopting a directive, regulation or decision on the matter in accordance with Article 189 of the Treaty.
V tomto pﾖópadｸ, podobnｸ jako v pﾖedchozóm, musó oznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt respektovat obdobó pozastavenó pracó dlouhï 12 mｸsócヮ.
Member States must then respect a standstill period of 12 months.