natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Tómto zpヮsobem mohou v̅robci, kdy™ pﾖijde ｲas, okam™itｸ exportovat v̅robky, kterï jsou plnｸ ve shodｸ s po™adavky tｸchto norem a pﾖedpisヮ,
In this way, manufacturers can, when the time comes, immediately export products which comply fully with the requirements of these standards or regulations;
̌ vyjadﾖovat svoje nèzory na nutnï zmｸny v plènovan̅ch technick̅ch pﾖedpisech, kterï by mohly b̅t pﾖekè™kami ob-chodu, a tóm usnadﾏovat pﾖóstup k v̅robkヮm a slu™bèm in-formaｲnó spoleｲnosti na mezistètnó ÿrovni. Hospodèﾖskï
› to express their views on necessary amendments to planned technical regulations which may form barriers to trade, in or-
̌ Komise ka™d̅ rok v àﾖednóm vｸstnóku zveﾖejﾏuje statistickï ÿdaje o pﾖijat̅ch nèvrzóch, reakce na tyto nèvrhy a ﾖózenó o poruþenó prèva, kterè byla bｸhem roku zahèjena na zèkladｸ poruþenó nebo nesplnｸnó ustanovenó podle smｸrnice (v sou-ladu s ｲlènkem 11 smｸrnice) (75).
› Each year, the Commission publishes statistics in the OJEU on the noti«cationsreceived,thereactionstothesenoti«ca-tions, and infringement proceedings instituted during the year for failure to fu l « l t h e o b l i g a t i o n s u n d e r t h e D i r e c t i v e ( i n a c c o r d a n c e with Article 11 of the Directive).
75) Viz statistickï ÿdaje o technick̅ch pﾖedpisech oznèmen̅ch v roce 2004 podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES, àﾖ. vｸst. C 158, 29.6.2005, str. 20.
See the statistics on technical regulations n o t i « e d i n 2 0 0 4 u n d e r D i r e c t i v e 9 8 / 3 4 / E C , O J C 1 5 8 , 2 9 . 6 . 2 0 0 5 , p . 2 0 .
dajó za oznamovènó nèvrhヮ nèrodnóch technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ Komisi.
national standardisation bodies (listed in Annex 2 to this booklet), in order to «ndinformationcommunicatedonnewwork entered in the national standards programmes.
̌ Mohou takï po™èdat o konzultaci mｸsóｲnｸ sestavovan̅ re-gistr v ÿstﾖednóm sekretariètu CEN/CENELEC, kter̅ sekreta-rièt posólè vþem nèrodnóm normalizaｲnóm orgènヮm (jejich seznam je uveden v pﾖóloze II tïto pﾖóruｲky), a zóskat tak in-formace o nov̅ch ÿkolech, kterï nèrodnó normalizaｲnó or-gèny uvèdｸjó ve sv̅ch normalizaｲnóch programech.
› They can contact the national standardisation bodies, mem-bers of CEN or CENELEC, in order to obtain the texts of drafts entered in the national standards programmes.
Ostatnó zdroje informacó
Other sources of information
̌ Mohou rovnｸ™ kontaktovat nèrodnó normalizaｲnó orgèny, ｲleny CEN nebo CENELEC a vy™èdat si texty nèvrhヮ uvèdｸ-n̅ch v nèrodnóch normalizaｲnóch programech.
› They can consult the reports on the operation of the Direc-tive, both as regards the `standards' and the `technical regu-lations' aspect, which are regularly published by the Commission.
̌ Mohou nahlïdnout do zprèv o uplatﾏovènó smｸrnice, jak s ohledem na ¶normyƒ, tak s ohledem na ¶technickï pﾖedpisyƒ, kterï Komise pravidelnｸ zveﾖejﾏuje (77).
› In order to facilitate industry's access to national technical regulations, the Commission has developed a comprehen-sive database of all n o t i « e d d r a ft t e x t s c a l l e d T R I S ( T e c h n i c a l R effg u l a t i o n s Information System) which is accessible to the public on the Europa website.
̌ S cólem informovat soukromï osoby a spoleｲnosti o zahèje-n̅ch ﾖózenóch o poruþenó prèva proti technick̅m pﾖedpisヮm, pﾖijat̅m v rozporu se smｸrnicó, Komise vydèvè informace pro tisk.
› The Commission issues press releases to inform private indi-viduals and companies of infringement proceedings against texts of technical regulations adopted in breach of the Direc-tive.
Soukromè osoba nebo spoleｲnost mヮ™e vyu™ót tyto informace pﾖi jednènóch s nèrodnómi orgèny, v souladu se zèsadou nevynutitelnosti technickïho pﾖedpisu pﾖijatïho v rozporu se smｸrnicó 98/34/ES.
This information can be used by a private individual or a company before a national authority, in support of the prin-ciple of non-applicability of a technical regulation adopted in breach of Directive 98/34/EC.
Kromｸ vyhledèvacóho systïmu mヮ™e þirokè veﾖejnost prostﾖed-nictvóm tïto webovï strènky pou™óvat automatick̅ pohoto-vostnó systïm (Alert System).
In addition to the search system, the general public can use the automatic Alert System via this Website.
Zèjemcヮm o jeho vyu™óvènó se staｲó jenom zaregistrovat a vybrat si jednu nebo nｸkolik ozna-movacóch kategorió. Na zèkladｸ registrace a volby kategorie(ó) systïm TRIS prostﾖednictvóm elektronickï poþty automaticky oznèmó vþechny novｸ oznèmenï a obdr™enï texty v danï kate-gorii nebo kategorióch.
All one needs to do is register and select one or several noti«cationcategories.TRISwill automatically e-mail the subscriber as soon as a new noti-«edtextinthechosencategoryorcategorieshasbeenreceived.If a draft under examination subsequently causes the subscrib-er problems or is likely to hinder trade relations in the European Union, he/she is invited to forward any comments and make any concerns known either to the Commission or to the author-ities responsible in his/her particular Member State.
V pﾖópadｸ, ™e zkouman̅ nèvrh zpヮsobó u™ivateli systïmu problïmy nebo obsahuje pﾖekè™ky, kterï by mohly nepﾖóznivｸ ovlivnit obchodnó vztahy v Evropskï unii, mヮ™e u™ivatel poslat jakïkoliv pﾖipomónky nebo obavy, a to buｵ Komisi, nebo odpovｸdn̅m orgènヮm svïho vlastnóho ｲlen-skïho stètu.
The above cited sources of information enable private individ-uals and other interested parties to be informed of the noti«ca-tions and to ensure that technical regulations with which they are obliged to comply have indeed been noti«ed.Ifthisisnotso, they can assert their rights through reference to the case-law of the Court of Justice.
̌ Zainteresovanï strany mohou takï text nèvrhu technickïho pﾖedpisu obdr™et od centrèl jednotliv̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ (uvedeny v seznamu v pﾖóloze I tïto pﾖóruｲky), kterï odpovó-
› Interested parties may also obtain the text of draft technical regulations from the central units of the Member States (list-ed in Annex 1 to this booklet) which are responsible for noti-fying the Commission of national draft technical regula-tions.
Jestli™e oznèmeny nebyly, mohou svè prèva uplatnit prostﾖednictvóm odkazu na precedenｲnó prèvo Soudnóho dvora.
› They can ask to consult the monthly register at the Central Secretariat of CEN/CENELEC, which is distributed to all the
(76) http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/(77) Pósla odkazヮ na tyto zprèvy jsou uvedena v bibliogra«ckïmpﾖehledutïtopﾖóruｲky.
The `CIA Security' judgment and the `Unilever' judgment, deliv-ered under the preliminary ruling procedure by the Court of Justice, are key elements in the protection of private individu- http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/tris/The reference numbers of these reports are given in the bibliography for this booklet.
Soudnó rozhodnutó v pﾖópadｸ ¶CIA Securityƒ a ¶Unileverƒ vyda-nè Soudnóm dvorem v soudnóm ﾖózenó o pﾖedbｸ™nï otèzce jsou klóｲovï prvky ochrany soukrom̅ch osob proti nedodr™e-nó povinnostó ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ vypl̅vajócóch pro nｸ ze smｸrni-ce 98/34/ES (78).
als against failure on the part of Member States to ful«ltheirobligations under Directive 98/34/EC.
Soukromï osoby a podniky tak majó mo™nost zajistit, aby ka™d̅ technick̅ pﾖedpis pﾖijóman̅ ｲlensk̅m stètem byl pﾖed sv̅m pﾖijetóm Komisó a ｲlensk̅mi stèty sledovèn (s v̅jimkami uvede-n̅mi ve smｸrnici). V opaｲnïm pﾖópadｸ se mヮ™e napﾖ. spoleｲ-nost odvolat na nevynutitelnost dotｲenïho technickïho pﾖed-pisu, jestli™e ji stètnó orgèn obvinó z jeho nedodr™ovènó.
is monitored before its adoption by the Commission and the other Member States (with the exceptions mentioned in the Directive).
V pﾖópadｸ jakïhokoliv nèrodnóho soudnóho ﾖózenó v tïto zèle™itos-ti musó soud odmótnout takov̅ pﾖedpis aplikovat a nemヮ™e jej proto pova™ovat za poruþen̅.
In the event of any national court proceedings resulting from the matter, the court must then set aside the application of the regulation and cannot, as a result, regard it as having been breached.
Toto schvèlenó principu nevynutitelnosti nèrodnóch technic-k̅ch pﾖedpisヮ, kterï nebyly oznèmeny, pro tﾖetó strany posiluje postoj, kter̅ ji™ Komise pﾖijala v roce 1986 (8/) a v tomto ohledu zvyþuje ochranu zèjmヮ soukrom̅ch osob a podnikヮ.
These judgments specify the consequences of the adoption of a technical regulation in breach of the obligations laid down by Directive 98/34/EC: private individuals can invoke Articles 8 and 9 of the Directive before the national court, which must refuse to apply a national technical regulation that has not been n o t i « e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e D i r e c t i v e o r w h i c h has been noti«edbuthasbeenadoptedduringandnot after the expiration of the standstill period laid down by the Directive.
Tato rozhodnutó podrobnｸ stanovó dヮsledky, kterï s sebou nese pﾖijetó technickïho pﾖedpisu, jen™ poruþuje povinnosti pﾖedepsanï smｸrnicó 98/34/ES: soukromï osoby se mohou odvolat na ｲlènek 8 a 9 smｸrnice u nèrodnóho soudu, kter̅ musó odmótnout aplikovat nèrodnó technick̅ pﾖedpis, kter̅ nebyl oznèmen v souladu se smｸrnicó, nebo kter̅ byl oznè-men, ale pﾖijat pﾖed uplynutóm obdobó pozastavenó pracó sta-novenïho smｸrnicó.
Private individuals and enterprises have the possibility to en-sure that any technical regulation adopted by a Member State
(78) Soudnó rozhodnutó z 30. dubna 1996 ¶V̅klad ｲlènku 30 Smlouvy o ES a smｸrnice 83/189/EHS, kter̅m se stanovó postup pro poskytovènó informacó v oblasti technick̅ch norem a pﾖedpisヮ › Nèrodnó legislativa pro odbyt zabezpeｲovacóch systïmヮ a sótó › Pﾖedchozó sprèvnó souhlasƒ vydanï v pﾖópadｸ C-194/94 ¶CIA
This sanctioning of the principle of the non-applicability to third parties of national technical regulations which have not been noti«ed,supportsthepositionwhichhadbeenalreadyadopted by the Commission in 1986 and enhances the pro-tection of the interests of private individuals and enterprises in this respect.
Securityƒ [1996] ECR I-2201 a soudnó rozhodnutó z 26. zèﾖó ¶V̅klad smｸrnice V̅boru 83/189/EHS, kter̅m se stanovó postup pro poskytovènó informacó v oblasti technick̅ch norem a pﾖedpisヮ › Oznamovacó povinnost a odlo™enó pﾖijetó › Pou™itelnost v obｲanskoprèvnóm ﾖózenóƒ vydanï v pﾖópadｸ C-443/98 ¶Unileverƒ [2000] ECR I-7535.
Judgment of 30th April 1996 `Interpretation of Article 30 of the EC Treaty and of Directive 83/189/EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsandregulations-Nationallegislationonthemarketingofalarmsystemsandnetworks-Prioradministrativeapproval,'deliv-ered in Case C-194/94 `CIA Security' [1996] ECR I-2201 and Judgment of 26th September 2000 `Interpretation of Council Directive 83/189/EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsandregulations›Obligationsofnoti«cationandpostponementofadoption› Ap-plicability in civil proceedings', delivered in Case C-443/98 `Unilever' [2000] ECR I-7535.'
Z è v ｸ r jasnｸ prèvnｸ odliþit hospodèﾖskï subjekty, kterï podnikajó na zèkladｸ svobody usazovènó a tｸmi hospodèﾖsk̅mi subjekty, kterï chtｸjó poskytovat jenom pﾖeshraniｲnó slu™by.
C o n c l uffs i o n role in the case of national authorities, notably as regards the need to make a clear legal distinction between operators act-ing under the freedom of establishment and those only wish-ing to provide crossborder services.
To je mezi jin̅m jasnｸ vidｸt ze zaｲleﾏovènó dolo™ky o vzèjem-nïm uznèvènó do urｲit̅ch nèvrhヮ nèrodnóch technick̅ch pﾖed-pisヮ v oznamovacó fèzi; z dobrï vヮle, kterou ｲlenskï stèty pro-kèzaly pﾖi opravovènó chyb objeven̅ch Komisó nebo ostatnómi ｲlensk̅mi stèty v oznèmen̅ch nèvrzóch; z plnｸnó povinnosti oznamovat plènovanï novï normalizaｲnó ｲinnosti a nèvrhy technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ ve valnï vｸtþinｸ pﾖópadヮ; a z rychlïho v̅-voje evropskï normalizace.
In the context of the 2005 renewed Lisbon strategy and as part of its Better Regulation programme, the Commission an-nounced its intention to launch a comprehensive initiative to ensure that the regulatory framework in the EU meets the re-quirements of the twenty-«rstcentury.Closercooperationwiththe Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU and the reinforce-ment of the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national level and with stakeholders were identi«edaskey action lines in this respect.
V souvislosti s novou Lisabonskou strategió z roku 2005 a jako souｲèst svïho programu Better Regulation (Zlepþenó prèvnó ÿpravy) oznèmila Komise ÿmysl realizovat komplexnó iniciati-vu, kterè mè zajistit, ™e prèvnó rèmec v Evropskï unii bude spl-ﾏovat po™adavky dvacètïho prvnóho stoletó. Jako klóｲovï smｸry ｲinnosti byly v tomto ohledu urｲeny: u™þó spoluprèce s ｲlensk̅-mi stèty, kterè mè zajistit pou™óvènó lepþóch zèsad ﾖózenó vþude v Evropskï unii, a posólenó tvoﾖivïho dialogu mezi vþemi ﾖódicómi orgèny na ÿrovni Evropskï unie a na nèrodnó ÿrovni a se zainte-resovan̅mi subjekty.
This is evident, among other things, from the inclusion of the mutual recognition clause in certain draft national legislative texts at the n o t i « c a t i o n s t a g e ; t h effg o o d w i l l s h o w n b y t h e Mffe mb e r States in correcting errors discovered by the Commission or by the other Member States in noti«eddrafts;thecompli-ance in the vast majority of cases with the obligation to notify planned new standardisation activities and draft technical reg-ulations; and from the rapid development of European stand-ardisation.
Ve zhruba 95 % pﾖópadヮ, kdy Komise reagovala, aby uvedla nè-vrhy nèrodnóch technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ do souladu s prèvem Spoleｲenstvó, ｲlenskï stèty souhlasily s provedenóm nezbyt-n̅ch zmｸn a sladｸnóm sv̅ch legislativ s prèvnómi pﾖedpisy Ev-ropskïho spoleｲenstvó, a tóm zabrènily, aby Komise zahèjila mnohem slo™itｸjþó soudnó ﾖózenó o poruþenó prèva.
In more or less 95% of the cases where the Commission reacted in order to bring the national draft regulations into conformity with Community law, Member States agreed to carry out the necessary changes and to align their legislation with EC law, thus avoiding the launching of the more cumbersome infringe-ment procedures by the Commission.
Spoluprèci a diskusi, kterï se pﾖóznivｸ mezi ｲlensk̅mi stèty prostﾖednictvóm postupu smｸrnice 98/34/ES rozvinuly, je mo™nï dolo™it skuteｲ-nostó, ™e napﾖ. mezi rokem 2002 a 2004 si ｲlenskï stèty vymｸni-ly 230 podrobn̅ch stanovisek.
The cooperation and dis-cussion fostered between Member States through the 98/34 procedure is evidenced by the fact that between 2002 and 2004, for instance, Member States exchanged 230 detailed opinions
Vóce ne™ dvacetiletï zkuþenosti se zavedenóm a pou™óvènóm po-stupu poskytovènó informacó, bｸhem nich™ Komise podrobila podrobnïmu zkoumènó vóce ne™ 10000 nèvrhヮ nèrodnóch opat-ﾖenó, jasnｸ ukèzaly, ™e se pﾖi odstraﾏovènó nov̅ch pﾖekè™ek ob-chodu jeþtｸ pﾖed jejich uzèkonｸnóm dosèhlo v̅znamnïho po-kroku a souｲasnｸ se podaﾖilo uþetﾖit tó™ivï nèklady na prèvnó a sprèvnó ﾖózenó a nèklady v ekonomickï sfïﾖe.
It is clear from a review of more than twenty years' experience with the implementation of the N o t i « c a t i o n P r o c e d u r e d u r i n g w h i c h time the Commission has screened more than 10.000 draft national measures that signi«cantprogresshasbeenmade in preventing the emergence of new barriers to trade, simultaneously saving onerous legal, administrative and eco-nomic costs.
V tomto ohledu je mo™nï oznamovacó postup podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES pova™ovat za pﾖedzvｸst zlepþenó prèvnó ÿpravy, proto™e se ukèzal b̅t ÿｲin-n̅m nèstrojem prヮmyslovï politiky a konkurenceschopnosti, kter̅ vytvoﾖil celou ﾖadu komunikaｲnóch cest mezi vþemi hlavnó-mi zainteresovan̅mi subjekty.
In this respect the 98/34 Noti«cationproceduremay be considered a precursor for better regulation as it has proved to be an e.ectiveinstrumentofindustrialpolicyandcompetitiveness which has created various channels of com-munication between all the main stakeholders.
V̅sledkem toho je model prèvnó transparence a sprèvnó spoluprèce, jeho™ oblast pou™itó lze dèle rozþóﾖit a podobnï v̅hody pﾖenïst i do ostatnóch odvｸtvó.
Consequently, it represents a model of regulatory transparency and adminis-trative cooperation whose scope of application might be fur-ther extended and provide similar bene«tsinothersectors.
Tento proces v evropskï integraci, kter̅ usnadﾏuje podporu a rヮst obchodu, je v̅sledkem spoleｲnïho ÿsiló Komise a ｲlen-sk̅ch stètヮ, kterï spoleｲn̅m postupem pﾖi prevenci vzniku no-v̅ch pﾖekè™ek obchodu snó™ily potﾖebu legislativy na ÿrovni Spoleｲenstvó a souｲasnｸ zv̅þily kvalitu technick̅ch norem a pﾖedpisヮ pﾖijat̅ch na nèrodnó ÿrovni.
This progress in European integration, which facilitates the maintenance and growth of trade, is the fruit of the joint e.ortsof the Commission and the Member States.
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES je kló-ｲov̅m nèstrojem politiky Spoleｲenstvó, kterou ｲeló vzniku pﾖe-kè™ek obchodu, co™ tento nèstroj umo™nil.
By acting together to prevent the emergence of new technical barriers to trade, they reduce the need for legislation on a Community level, and at the same time enhance the quality of the technical stand-ards and regulations adopted at national level.
Pﾖes svヮj nesporn̅ ÿspｸch se postup stanoven̅ smｸrnicó 98/34/ES mヮ™e stèle zlepþovat.
Directive 98/34/EC is the key instrument of Community policy to combat barri-ers to trade which has made this possible.
Pﾖesto™e se zdè, ™e dosa™enó vnitﾖnóho trhu v roce 1993 nezmen-þilo potﾖebu ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ pﾖijómat detailnó prèvnó ÿpravy pro v̅robky, seznèmily se ｲlenskï stèty postupnｸ s pravidly vnitﾖnó-ho trhu, zèsadou vzèjemnïho uznèvènó vypl̅vajócó z prece-dentnóho pﾖópadu ¶Cassis de Dijonƒ a ze zèsad transparentnosti a spoluprèce, kterï nynó ﾖódó jejich ｲinnost v oblasti technick̅ch norem a pﾖedpisヮ.
Although the completion of the internal market in 1993 does not appear to have diminished Member States' need to enact detailed legislation on products, they have become gradually familiar with the rules of the internal market, the principle of mutual recognition arising from the `Cassis de Dijon' precedent and the principles of transparency and co-operation, which now govern their activities in the «eldoftechnicalstandardsand regulations.
Podobnｸ i v oblasti slu™eb, i kdy™ zcela ne-dèvno, hrèl tento mechanismus v pﾖópadｸ nèrodnóch orgènヮ v̅znamnou vzdｸlèvacó ÿlohu zejmïna s ohledem na potﾖebu
Similarly, even if more recently, in the area of services this mechanism has played an important educational
Pokud se t̅kè norem, jsou jejich pozdnó oznèmenó a nｸkdy i ponｸkud nejasnï popisy nov̅ch ÿkolヮ nedostatky, na kterï ev-
Despite its success, the procedure laid down by Directive 98/34/EC could still be improved. This requires clear identi«cationof the points in need of improvement.
Kromｸ toho poｲet pﾖipomónek pﾖedlo™en̅ch nèrod-nómi normalizaｲnómi orgèny zヮstèvè ve srovnènó s poｲtem pﾖi-jat̅ch oznèmenó velmi nózk̅.
The involvement of in-dividual enterprises and particularly small and medium-sized businesses, which are often more reserved, could be improved.
To je znamenó, ™e hospodèﾖskï subjekty v Unii stèle plnｸ nevyu™óvajó svoji mo™nost a pﾖóle™itost vyjèdﾖit svï nèmitky k textヮm, kterï jsou potencièlnó hrozbou pro plynul̅ a dobr̅ chod vnitﾖnóho trhu.
They should not hesitate to seek information and speak up, even in a con«dentialway,whentheyconsiderthatthetechnicalprod-uct speci«cationsbeingpreparedincountriestowhichtheyex-port could harm their interests, if adopted as they stand.
Zdè se, ™e dヮvodem je skuteｲnost, ™e se evropskï normalizaｲnó or-gèny pﾖi organizovènó co nejþirþó distribuce informacó o nèvrzóch norem v ostatnóch ｲlensk̅ch stètech na nèrodnó ÿrovni a s cólem zóskat pﾖipomónky od v̅robcヮ v jejich oboru pヮsobnosti a jejich ÿｲast stèle ne plnｸ spolïhajó na podporu ze strany sv̅ch nèrod-nóch protｸjþkヮ. Svou pohotovostó a vy™adovènóm potﾖebn̅ch in-formacó od vhodn̅ch zdrojヮ mヮ™e prヮmysl sèm pﾖispｸt k ÿｲinnｸj-þómu obｸhu informacó, proto™e vyjèdﾖenóm sv̅ch potﾖeb mヮ™e tam, kde je tﾖeba, podnótit ustavenó pﾖósluþn̅ch informaｲnóch cest.
As far as standards are concerned, late noti«cationsandsome-times rather vague descriptions of new work are the shortcom-ings most frequently mentioned by the European standardisa-tion bodies when examining the noti«cations.Inaddition,thenumber of comments submitted by the national standardisa-tion bodies remains very low in comparison with the number of noti«cationsreceived.Thisisasignthateconomicoperatorsin the Union are still not making full use of their opportunities to express objections to texts which constitute a potential threat to the satisfactory operation of the internal market.
Komise podnikla nｸkterï dヮle™itï kroky s cólem usnadnit ÿｲast prヮmyslu.
The Commission has taken some important steps to facilitate the participation of industry.
V zèsadｸ se oznèmenï nèvrhy pﾖeklèdajó do vþech jazykヮ ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ Spoleｲenstvó a jsou pak volnｸ a bezplat-nｸ k dispozici veﾖejnosti na evropskï webovï strènce prostﾖed-nictvóm databèze systïmu TRIS (Technical Regulations Infor-mation System › Informaｲnó systïm technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ).
In principle, noti«eddraftsaretranslated into all Community languages and are then available free of charge to the public on the Europa site, via the TRIS (Technical Regulations Information System) database.
Kromｸ toho Komise vytvoﾖila automatick̅ pohotovostnó sys-tïm (Alert System) volnｸ pﾖóstupn̅ pro veﾖejnost na zèkladｸ registrace.
Further-more, the Commission has set up an automatic alert system to which the public may subscribe.
Systïm TRIS mヮ™e automaticky prostﾖednictvóm elektronickï poþty uvｸdomit hospodèﾖskï subjekty o tom, ™e v jednï nebo vóce v̅robkov̅ch kategorióch nebo v jednï nebo vóce kategorióch slu™eb informaｲnó spoleｲnosti, ve kter̅ch se registrovaly, byl pﾖijat nov̅ oznèmen̅ text.
This permits economic opera-tors to be automatically n o t i « e d b y T R I S v i a e - m a i l a s s o o n a s a n e w n o t i « e d t e x t i s r e c e i v e d i n t h e p r o d u c t o r I n f o r m a t i o n S o - c i e t y services category or categories selected.
Smｸrnice 98/34/ES se nachèzó v pﾖelomovïm obdobó: pﾖijetó smｸrnice 98/48/ES o slu™bèch informaｲnó spoleｲnosti a pﾖóstup deseti nov̅ch ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ do Unie dne 1. kvｸtna 2004 zè-sadnｸ zmｸnilo pou™itó tïto prèvnó ÿpravy, jejó™ geogra«ck̅do-sah se bude i nadèle rozþiﾖovat.
Directive 98/34/EC is at a turning point: the adoption of Direc-tive 98/48/EC on Information Society services and the acces-sion of ten new Member States to the Union on 1 May 2004 have radically changed the application of the legislation, the geographical scope of which will continue to expand.
S ohledem na postup poskytovènó informacó vztahujócó se na technickï pﾖedpisy a pravidla pro slu™by informaｲnó spoleｲnosti zkuþenosti ukèzaly, ™e se v nｸkter̅ch pﾖópadech ｲlensk̅m stè-tヮm nedaﾖó jejich nèvrhy oznamovat, nebo ™e se nｸkterè jejó usta-novenó pou™óvajó nesprèvnｸ, co™ mヮ™e b̅t dヮsledkem nedosta-teｲnï znalosti postupu ze strany orgènヮ, kterï jsou odpovｸdny za pﾖópravu textヮ tｸchto pﾖedpisヮ.
With regard to the procedure for the provision of information applicable to technical regulations and rules on Information Society services, experience has shown that in some cases Member States are failing to notify their drafts, in breach of the provisions of the Directive, or applying some of these provi-sions erroneously as a result of insu/cientknowledgeoftheprocedure on the part of the bodies responsible for preparing the texts of these regulations.
Komise mè v ÿmyslu se sou-stavnｸ vｸnovat sv̅m informaｲnóm ｲinnostem v tïto oblasti, a to pﾖedevþóm prostﾖednictvóm þirþóho dialogu s nèrodnómi orgèny.
The Commission intends to pur-sue its information activities in this area, in particular through enhanced dialogue with the national authorities.
Mohla by se takï zlepþit ÿｲast jednotliv̅ch podnikヮ, zvlèþtｸ mal̅ch a stﾖednｸ velk̅ch, kterï jsou ｲasto zdr-
Some European federations exercise a high degree of `legislative vigilance' and are very active