natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sprâvnî spo-luprâce se bude zaklâdat na ustanovenîch Úmluvy o vzâjemnê pomoci a spoluprâci mezi celnîmi sprâvami (dâle jen ‡úmluva Neapol II;).
Administrative cooperation will lean on the prepositions of the Convention concerning Mutual Assistance and Cooperation between Customs Administrations (the `Naples II' Convention (9)).
Mechanismy soudnî spoluprâce budou stejnê jako mechanismy stanovenê v Úmluv┞ o vzâjemnê pomoci v trestnîch v┞cech mezi ┘lenskþmi stâty Evropskê unie a v jejîm dodatkovêm protokolu32.
The arrangements for judicial cooperation will be similar to those established by the Convention for Mutual Judicial Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and its additional protocol (10).
Soudnî spoluprâce v ob- lasti donucovacîch opat┼enî (prohlîdky a exekuce) se bude ┼îdit zâsadou dvojî trestnosti, j e Š je stanovena a formulovâna v provâd┞cî úmluv┞ k Schengenskê dohod┞33.
Judicial cooperation in coercive measures (searches and seizures) will be subject to the double criminality principle, as laid down and formulated by the same terms as in the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement (11).
Ustanovenî tþkajîcî se boje proti pranî ùpinavþch pen┞z rovn┞Š vychâzejî z ‡acquis communautaireƒ v têto oblasti34.
The money-laundering provisions are also based on the Community acquis relating to this area (12).
Komise doufâ, Še podobnê dohody budou moci bþt v budoucnu uzav┼eny s dalùîmi t┼etîmi zem┞mi.
The Commission hopes that similar agreements can be negotiated with other third coun-tries in the future.
J i Š n┞kolik let Spole┘enstvî vedou rozhodnþ boj proti paùovânî cigaret, kterê vþrazn┞ po-ùkozuje jak evropskþ rozpo┘et, tak rozpo┘et ┘lenskþch stât╉.
For several years, the European Community has been vigorously combating cigarette smuggling, which causes considerable damage to the EU and Member States' budgets.
V letech 2000 a 2001 Komise a deset ┘lenskþch stât╉35 podaly u soudnîch orgân╉ v New Yorku ob┘anskoprâvnî Šalobu proti tabâkovþm spole┘nostem RJ Reynolds a jinî, pro pravd┞podobnou ú┘ast na paùovânî cigaret a na pranî ùpinavþch pen┞z, a p o Š a d o v a l y , aby soud p┼ijal takovâ opat┼enî, kterâ by do budoucna paùovânî zabrânila.
In 2000 and 2001, the Commission and 10 Member States (13) brought civil proceed-
SEK(2005) 973.KOM(2004) 559 v kone┘nêm zn┞nî a 2004/0187 (CNS), dosud nezve┼ejn┞no v Ú┼. v┞st.Akt Rady ze dne 18. prosince 1997, Ú┼. v┞st. C 24, 23.1.1998, s. 1. Úmluva ze dne 29. kv┞tna 2000, Ú┼. v┞st. C 197, 12.7.2000 a dodatkovþ protokol ze dne 16. ┼îjna 2001, Ú┼. v┞st. C 326, 21.11.2001.Provâd┞cî úmluva k Schengenskê dohod┞, Ú┼. v┞st. L 239, 22.9.2000.
SEC(2005) 973.COM(2004) 559 final and 2004/0187 (CNS), not yet published in the OJ.Council Act of 18 December 1997, OJ C 24, 23.1.1998, p. 1.
Dne 9. ┘ervence 2004 Komise a deset vþùe uvedenþch stât╉ oznâmily uzav┼enî dohody s vþrobcem cigaret Philip Morris International (PMI); v dohod┞ je stanoven ú┘innþ systêm boje proti paùovânî a pad┞lânî cigaret, kterþ ukon┘î spory mezi stranami dohody v têto oblasti.
On 9 July 2004, the European Commission and the 10 Member States announced that an agreement had been concluded with the cigarette company Philip Morris International (PMI), establishing an effective system for combating cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting in the future and putting an end to the differences between the parties in this area.
Na zâklad┞ têto dohody bude PMI spolupracovat s útvary Komise, zejmêna s OLA-Fem, a se soudnîmi orgâny ┘lenskþch stât╉ v boji proti paùovânî a pad┞lânî.
Under this agreement, PMI will cooperate with the Commission's depart-ments, particularly OLAF, and the judicial authorities of the Member States in the fight against contraband and counterfeiting.
Dohoda v têto souvislosti rovn┞Š zahrnuje finan┘nî ustanovenî, na j e j i c h Š zâklad┞ bude PMI po dobu dva-nâcti let odvâd┞t ┘âstku pohybujîcî se kolem 1,25 miliardy dolar╉.
In this context, the agreement also con-tains financial provisions whereby PMI is to pay around USD 1.25 billion over 12 years.
Strany dohody doufajî, Še tato dohoda bude p┼îkladem pro podobnê dohody s dalùîmi spole┘nostmi.
The partners to this agreement hope that this will provide a model for similar agreements with other companies.
Ústavnî smlouva a projekt vytvo╄enî evropskê prokuratury
The Constitution and the proposal to establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office
Podvody poùkozujîcî finan┘nî zâjmy Spole┘enstvî a zapojenî organizovanêho zlo┘inu svou povahou p┼ekra┘ujî hranice stât╉, a proto je t┼eba, aby vnitrostâtnî policejnî a soudnî orgâ-ny spolupracovaly nap┼î┘ celou Evropou.
The transnational nature of fraud affecting the Communities' financial interests and the role played by organised crime make it necessary to remove the boundaries for the national police and judicial authorities to cooperate across Europe.
P ┼ e s t o Š e se za tîmto ú┘elem po┘îtâ s ur┘itþmi dohodami, ú┘innosti v potîrânî podvod╉ stâle brânî p┼edevùîm rozdrobenost evropskêho prostoru pro vymâhânî prâva.
Although numer-ous agreements have been signed for this purpose, the main obstacle to effective sup-pression of fraud is still the fragmentation of the European criminal law-enforcement area.
V roce 2001 byla p┼ijata zelenâ kniha36, j e j î m Š cîlem bylo rozùî┼it diskusi k tomuto têmatu.
In 2001, the Commission adopted a Green Paper (14) to widen the debate.
Konvent o budoucnosti Evropy37 v l o Š i l do nâvrhu ústav- nî smlouvy ustanovenî u m o Š ┵ u j î c î vytvo┼enî evropskê prokuratury.
The Convention on the Future of Europe (15) inserted a provision allowing the creation of a European Public Prosecutor's Office in the draft Treaty.
Smlouva o Ústav┞ pro Evropu v ┘lânku III-274 stanovî, Še pro boj proti trestnþm ┘in╉m poùkozujîcîm nebo o h r o Š u j î c î m finan┘nî zâjmy Unie m╉Še evropskþ zâkon Rady vytvo┼it z Eurojustu Ú┼ad evropskêho ve┼ejnêho Šalobce.
Finally, Article III-274 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe states that once the Treaty comes into force, the Council, acting unanimously and after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament, may establish a European Public Prosecutor's Office from Eurojust to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union.
Rada rozhoduje jednomysln┞ po o b d r Š e n î souhlasu Evropskêho parlamentu. Tento ú┼ad ve┼ejnêho Šalobce je p┼îsluùnþ k vyùet┼ovânî, stîhânî a podânî o b Š a l o b y na pachatele a spolupachatele t┞chto trestnþch ┘in╉.
The European Public Prosecutor's Office would be responsible for investigating, pros-ecuting and bringing to judgment the perpetrators of, and accomplices in, offences of this type.
Rada m╉Še jednomysln┞ po o b d r Š e n î souhlasu Parlamentu a po konzultaci s Komisî p┼ijmout evrop-skê rozhodnutî, aby rozùî┼ila pravomoci Ú┼adu evropskêho ve┼ejnêho Šalobce tak, aby za-hrnovaly boj proti z â v a Š n ê trestnê ┘innosti s mezinârodnîm rozm┞rem.
The Council, acting unanimously after obtaining Parliament's consent and after consultation with the Commission, may adopt a European decision to extend the Office's powers to fight serious international crime.
V kv┞tnu 200538 Komise ve svêm nâvrhu haagskêho plânu oznâmila, Še v râmci evropskê soudnî spoluprâce a Eurojustu zajistî, aby se pokra┘ovalo v zapo┘atê prâci, a prozkoumâ m o Š n o s t i , kterê ústava nabîzî, pokud jde o zlepùenî ochrany finan┘nîch zâjm╉ Unie.
The Commission announced in May 2005 (16), in its proposal for the Hague action plan in the context of European judicial cooperation and Eurojust, that it will follow up its previous work and the possibilities afforded by the Constitution, as regards strengthening the protection of the Union's financial interests.
Zelenâ kniha o trestnî ochran┞ finan┘nîch zâjm╉ Spole┘enstvî a vytvo┼enî institutu evropskêho ve┼ejnêho Šalobce, KOM(2001) 715.Konvent o budoucnosti Evropy, kterêmu p┼edsedal V. Giscard d'Estaing, byl svolân na zâklad┞ Laekenskê deklarace o budoucnosti Evropskê unie s cîlem promyslet b l i Š ù î modality reformy evropskþch institucî.KOM(2005) 184.Poslednî ┘âst odstavce 4 se zruùuje; stanovovala, Še ‡opat┼enî proti podvod╉m a p┼edchâzenî podvod╉m poùkozujîcîm finan┘nî zâjmy Unie se netþkajî ani uplat┵ovânî vnitrostâtnîho trestnîho prâva, ani organizace soudnictvî v ┘lenskþch stâtech.ƒ
Green Paper on criminal law protection of the financial interests of the Community and the establishment of a European Prosecutor, COM(2001) 715.The Convention on the Future of the Union, chaired by Mr Giscard d'Estaing, was set up following the Laeken declara-tion on the future of the European Union to launch a debate on the reform of the European institutions.COM(2005) 184.
VÞSLEDKY BOJE PROTI PODVOD┐M: ANALÞZY STATISTIK A NOVÂ OPAT┄ENÎ P┄IJATÂ KOMISÎ A ヮLENSKÞMI STÂTY
RESULTS OF THE FIGHT AGAINST FRAUD: STATISTICAL ANALYSES AND NEW MEASURES TAKEN BY THE COMMISSION AND THE MEMBER STATES
Prâvnî p┼edpisy Spole┘enstvî ┘lenskþm stât╉m uklâdajî, aby oznamovaly podvody a jinê nesrovnalosti, kterê poùkozujî finan┘nî zâjmy ve vùech oblastech ┘innosti Spole┘enstvî3:.
Community legislation requires the Member States to notify fraud and other irregularities detrimental to the Communities' financial interests in all areas of its activity (18).
Stejnou povinnost majî zem┞, j e Š jsou p┼îjemci podpor z p┼edvstupnîch fond╉.
The same requirement applies to countries benefiting from the pre-accession funds.
Dokument útvar╉ Komise, kterþ je zve┼ejn┞n sou┘asn┞ s touto zprâvou, p┼inâùî d╉kladn┞jùî analþzu statistik, j e Š byly vypracovâny na zâklad┞ t┞chto sd┞lenî3;.
The Commission document published at the same time as this report contains an in-depth analysis of the statistics obtained on the basis of these communications (19).
V nâsledujîcî tabulce je uveden po┘et nesrovnalostî sd┞lenþch v roce 2004 a p┼îsluùnê ┘âstky za k a Š d ê odv┞tvî.
Table 2.1 shows the number of irregularities notified in 2004 and the amounts involved in each area.
Tabulka 2.1 « Po┡et nesrovnalostî a ┡âstky
Table 2.1. ̋ Number of irregularities and amounts
CELKEM ZA ROK 2004Po┡et sd┦lenþch nesrovnalostî
Total 2004 Number of irregularities notified
Obecn┞ lze ┼îci, Še po┘et oznâmenþch nesrovnalostî za rok 2004 mâ vzestupnou tendenci. Naopak odhadovanþ finan┘nî dopad nesrovnalostî ve vùech odv┞tvîch klesâ, vyjma struk-turâlnî pomoci; v pr╉m┞ru se jednâ o 0,19 % v oblasti vþdaj╉ na zem┞d┞lstvî, 1,5 % v p┼î-pad┞ vlastnîch zdroj╉ a 2 % v oblasti strukturâlnî pomoci (v┘etn┞ Fondu s o u d r Š n o s t i ) .
There was an overall increase in the number of irregularities notified for 2004.
Je vùak t┼eba rozliùovat mezi podvody a nesrovnalostmi.
However, distinction should be made between fraud and irregularity.
Podvod je definovân jako nesrovna-lost, kterâ byla spâchâna zâm┞rn┞, a pouze soudce je oprâvn┞n ji jako takovou posoudit42. Jednâ se o trestnþ ┘in. V oblasti vþdaj╉ na zem┞d┞lstvî p┼edstavujî podez┼enî na podvod p ┼ i b l i Š n ┞ 11 % ohlâùenþch nesrovnalostî. V p┼îpad┞ strukturâlnîch fond╉ se podvody tþka-jî p ┼ i b l i Š n ┞ 20 % nesrovnalostî.
Fraud is defined as an irregularity committed deliberately, which only the courts can classify as such (20).
Tradi┡nî vlastnî zdroje
Traditional own resources
V têto oblasti se po┘et oznâmenþch p┼îpad╉ (2 735 za rok 2004) neustâle zvyùuje, na rozdîl od p┼îsluùnê ┘âstky (205,7 milion╉ EUR), j e Š od roku 2002 klesâ a odpovîdâ p ┼ i b l i Š n ┞ 1,5 % celkovþch vlastnîch zdroj╉, j e Š byly vybrâny (12 307 milion╉ EUR43v roce 2004).
The number of cases notified in this area (2 735 cases for 2004) is rising steadily, but the amount affected (EUR 205.7 million) has been falling since 2002 and represents around
Vþrobky a produkty, kterê byly v roce 2004 nejvîce z a s a Š e n y nesrovnalostmi, jsou cigarety, televizory a cukr.
In 2004, the products most affected by the irregularities were cigarettes, televisions and sugar.
C 316, 27.11.1995), v platnost vstoupila dne 17. ┼îjna 2002.Tato ┘âstka odpovîdâ celnîm dluh╉m, kterê jsou uvedeny v ‡ú┘tech Aƒ ┘lenskþch stât╉ za rok 2004, tj. dluh╉m, j e Š jsou splaceny a/nebo zajiùt┞ny.
The sums for which a customs debt has been opened but which have not been paid or guaranteed (or have been guaranteed but are contested) are recorded in the B accounts and are not included in this figure.
V ‡ú┘tech Bƒ jsou uvedeny ┘âstky, na kterê byl vytvo┼en celnî dluh, kterê vùak nebyly ani splaceny, ani zajiùt┞ny (nebo byly zajiùt┞ny, ale dluh je popîrân); nejsou zahrnuty do tohoto ┘îselnêho údaje. ﾚâstky, u n i c h Š se na zâklad┞ sd┞lenî zjistily nesrovnalosti, se tþkajî jak ú┘t╉ A, tak ú┘t╉ B.
The amounts notified as being affected by irregularities are divided between A and B accounts.
Graf 2.1.1 « Oznâmenî o nesrovnalostech v oblasti tradi┡nîch vlastnîch zdroj] 2000«2004 (┡âstky v mil. EUR)
Graph 2.1.1. ̋ Notifications of irregularities in the area of traditional own resources, 2000«04
Vþdaje na zem┦d┦lstvî (zâru┡nî sekce EZOZF)
Agricultural expenditure (EAGGF Guarantee Section)
V roce 2004 se po┘et sd┞lenþch nesrovnalostî v porovnânî s p┼edchozîmi roky mîrn┞ zvþùil (3 401 p┼îpad╉). Jejich finan┘nî dopad se naopak s n î Š i l (82 milion╉ EUR) a odpovîdâ p ┼ i - b l i Š n ┞ 0,19 % celkovþch p o l o Š e k zâvazk╉ zâru┘nî sekce EZOZF (42 935 milion╉ EUR za rok 2004, z┼etelnê zlepùenî v porovnânî s údaji z p┼edchozîch let).
In 2004, the number of notified irregularities increased slightly with respect to previ-ous years (3 401 cases), but their financial impact decreased (EUR 82 million); it rep-resents around 0.19 % of the total EAGGF Guarantee Section appropriations (EUR 42 935 million for 2004, which is a huge improvement compared with preceding years' figures).
Graf 2.1.2 « Oznâmenî o nesrovnalostech v oblasti zem┦d┦lskþch vþdaj] 2000«2004 (┡âstky v mil. EUR)
Graph 2.1.2. ̋ Notifications of irregularities in the area of agricultural expenditure, 2000«04
Stanovenâ ┡âstka (v mil. EUR)
Amounts (million EUR)
Komise zhodnotila, jak z â v a Š n þ je dopad podvod╉ na rozpo┘et Spole┘enstvî, a to jak na zâklad┞ odhad╉ ┘lenskþch stât╉, tak na zâklad┞ vlastnîch analþz.
The Commission has assessed the effect of fraud on the Community budget based both on estimates provided by the Member States and on its own analyses.
Podle jejîho odhadu lze 11 % ohlâùenþch nesrovnalostî, tj. celkovou ┘âstku v hodnot┞ p ┼ i b l i Š n ┞ 6,8 milionu EUR, posuzovat jako podvod.
According to the Com-mission's estimates, 11 % of the irregularities notified, i.e. 0.02 % of total appropriations for the EAGGF Guarantee Section, can be classified as fraud and the total amount involved is around EUR 6.8 million.
V┞tùina podez┼enî na podvod vychâzî z fiktivnîch prohlâùenî o ploùe a z pad┞lanþch celnîch doklad╉ a Šâdostî o podporu.
Most suspected fraud cases were committed using fictitious area declarations, forged customs documents and forged aid applications.
V roce 2004 se po┘et sd┞lenþch nesrovnalostî (3 339 p┼îpad╉, v┘etn┞ Fondu s o u d r Š n o s t i ) a jejich finan┘nî dopad (695,6 milion╉ EUR) v porovnânî s minulþm rokem zvþùily. Tuto zm┞nu lze p┼i┘îst vyùùîmu po┘tu p┼îpad╉ v râmci Evropskêho fondu pro regionâlnî rozvoj (EFRR).
In 2004, both the number of irregularities notified (3 339 cases, including Cohesion Funds) and their financial impact (EUR 695.6 million) increased with respect to the pre-vious year owing to an increase in cases of irregularities in the area of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Finan┘nî dopad t┞chto nesrovnalostî odpovîdâ p ┼ i b l i Š n ┞ 2 % prost┼edk╉ uvoln┞-nþch ze strukturâlnîch fond╉ a z Fondu s o u d r Š n o s t i (35 665 milionu EUR za rok 2004).
The financial impact of the irregularities notified in 2004 represents around 2 % of the Structural and Cohesion Fund appropriations (EUR 35 665 million for 2004).
Graf 2.1.3 « Oznâmenî o nesrovnalostech v oblasti strukturâlnîch opat╄enî 2000«2004 (┡âstky v mil. EUR)
Graph 2.1.3. ̋ Notifications of irregularities in the area of the Structural Funds, 2000«04
Stanovenâ ┡âstka (v mil. EUR)
Amount (million EUR)
P╄edvstupnî fondy
Pre-accession funds
Systêm oznamovânî nesrovnalostî, kterþ je podobnþ systêmu pro strukturâlnî fondy, byl zaveden prost┼ednictvîm vîceletþch dohod o financovânî pro fondy PHARE44
A system of notification of irregularities similar to that for the Structural Funds has been
Tabulka 2.1.4 « Oznâmenî nesrovnalostî tþkajîcîch se p╄edvstupnîch fond]. ヮâstky v milionech EUR odpovîdajîcî celkovþm nâklad]m, kterê jsou zp]sobilê pro financovânî v râmci projekt], u n i c h Š byly zjiùt┦ny nesrovnalosti.
Table 2.1.4. ̋ Notifications of irregularities in the area of the pre-accession funds (amounts represent the total eligible cost in respect of the projects affected by the irregularities)
Orgâny pov┞┼enê sd┞lovânîm nesrovnalostî musî i nadâle v┞novat velkê úsilî kvalit┞ sd┞le-nî.
The authorities in charge of notifying irregularities must continue to make serious efforts to improve the quality of the notifications.
Ve vîce n e Š 90 % p┼îpad╉ t o t i Š Komise nenî schopna rozeznat, jak je odhalenâ nesrov-nalost posouzena, kolik ┘inî vybranê ┘âstky a ┘âstky, j e Š jeùt┞ nebyly vybrâny.
In over 90 % of the cases notified it is impossible for the Commission to ascertain the classification of the irregularities detected, the amounts re-covered and the amounts yet to be recovered.
Z toho d╉-vodu vþùe uvedenâ tabulka zmi┵uje celkovê nâklady, kterê jsou zp╉sobilê pro financovânî v râmci projekt╉, u n i c h Š byly zjiùt┞ny nesrovnalosti, a nikoli ┘âstky skute┘n┞ uvoln┞nê.
It is for this reason that Table 2.1.4 gives the total amount of the eligible cost in respect of the projects affected rather than the amounts really affected.
Z dostupnþch údaj╉ prozatîm nelze u┘init d╉kladnou analþzu.
Thus, the figures available cannot yet be analysed in depth.
Seznâmenî s vþsledky boje proti podvod]m: informovânî ve╄ejnosti
Informing the public on the results of the fight against fraud
Komise pro zvþùenî pr╉hlednosti hodlâ lêpe informovat o formâch podvod╉ a jinþch ne-srovnalostî, kterê o h r o Š u j î finan┘nî zâjmy Spole┘enstvî, o jejich m o Š n þ c h d╉sledcîch a o opat┼enîch, kterâ jsou p┼ijîmâna k jejich zamezenî.
With a view to increased transparency, the Commission wishes to better inform the public about the types of frauds and other irregularities which threaten the Communities' finan-cial interests, the consequences which they may have and the measures which are taken to avoid them.
V listopadu 2004 OLAF se sîtî sd┞lovatel╉ uspo┼âdal v oblasti boje proti podvod╉m vzd┞-lâvacî seminâ┼, j e h o Š se zú┘astnili odbornîci na komunikaci vnitrostâtnîch orgân╉, kterê se bojem proti podvod╉m zabþvajî.
In November 2004, the European Anti-Fraud Office organised a seminar with the anti-fraud communicators network, bringing together the communication experts of the na-tional fraud authorities.
Ve svêm úvodnîm p┼îsp┞vku komisa┼ Siim Kallas ┼ekl, Še ‡pr╉hlednost je jednîm z klî┘ovþch prvk╉ v boji proti korupci a ùpatnêmu rozpo┘tovêmu ┼îzenî a rovn┞Š v p┼edchâzenî t┞mto jev╉m. Komunikace je ú┘innou sou┘âstî têto pr╉hled-nosti.
In his introductory speech, Commissioner Siim Kallas said that `transparency is one of the cornerstones of the fight against and prevention of corruption and fiscal mismanagement, and communication is the active side of transparency.
N┞kdy je sama o sob┞ pro p┼edchâzenî podvod╉m dosta┘ujîcî.ƒ Zd╉raznil vùak, Še v p┼îpad┞ vyùet┼ovânî je t┼eba najît v y v â Š e n o s t mezi r╉znþmi zâjmy.
However, in the case of investigations, different interests have to be weighed against each other.
Z analþzy p┼îsp┞vk╉ ┘lenskþch stât╉49 do têto zprâvy vyplþvâ, Še tyto r╉znê zâjmy se mezi sebou zna┘n┞ liùî prâvnîmi p┼edpisy, kterê se p o u Š î v a j î pro sd┞lovânî informacî tþkajîcîch se r╉znþch fâzî sprâvnîch nebo soudnîch vyùet┼ovânî.
Analysis of the contributions by the Member States (27) to this report shows that each country has different judicial and legislative rules on providing information to the public on the different stages of administrative or judicial inquiries.
N┞kterê ┘lenskê stâty jsou zastânci ùirokêho informovânî ve┼ejnosti jak v p┼îpad┞ vyùet┼o-vânî sprâvnîch útvar╉, tak v p┼îpad┞ vyùet┼ovânî soudnîch útvar╉, a to od zahâjenî vyùet-┼ovânî a Š do zve┼ejn┞nî vþsledk╉ j i Š uzav┼enêho vyùet┼ovânî.
A limited number of Member States are in favour of providing extensive information to the public on both administrative and judicial inquiries throughout the process, from the open-ing of an investigation to publication of information on an inquiry once it has been closed.
V┞tùina ┘lenskþch stât╉ vùak omezuje informovânî ve┼ejnosti pouze na ur┘itê fâze sprâvnîch vyùet┼ovânî. Dovolâvajî se zâsady, Še prâvo na informace musî bþt v rovno-vâze s nutnostî ochrany prâv na obhajobu, soukromêho Šivota a d╉stojnosti jednotliv-c╉. Odmîtajî rovn┞Š zve┼ej┵ovânî vþsledk╉ j i Š uzav┼enêho vyùet┼ovânî.
However, most Member States limit the information provided to the public on the differ-ent stages of administrative inquiries on the grounds that the public's right to be informed must be balanced against the need to protect the rights to defence, privacy and human dignity.
V p┼îpad┞ soudnîch vyùet┼ovânî p┼ipouùt┞jî, aby informovânî ve┼ejnosti bylo ùirùî; ke zve┼ej┵ovâ-nî obvykle nedochâzî automaticky, ale na Šâdost sd┞lovacîch prost┼edk╉ nebo na zâ-klad┞ vþslovnêho svolenî.
The information made public on judicial inquiries is more extensive, although it is usually only provided at the request of the media or with express authorisation rather than spontaneously.
Statistiky uvedenê v tomto sloupci zahrnujî sd┞lenî u┘in┞nâ Kyprem a Maltou na zâklad┞ na┼îzenî 555/2000.SEK(2005) 973.
The figures in this column include notifications made under Regulation (EC) No 555/2000 by Cyprus and Malta.SEC(2005) 973.
N î Š e uvedenâ ustanovenî jsou vybrâna jako objas┵ujîcî p┼îklady.
The legislation discussed below is intended solely for illustration.
Samostatnþ dokument Komise4: shrnuje vùechna novâ opat┼enî, kterâ byla p┼ijata b┞hem roku 2004 a kterâ sd┞li- ly ┘lenskê stâty.
A separate Commission document (28) lists all the new measures taken in 2004 reported by the Member States.
V p┼îpad┞ novþch ┘lenskþch stât╉ byla v zâsad┞ sd┞lena jen ta opat┼enî, kterâ byla p┼ijata nebo vstoupila v platnost po 1. kv┞tnu 2004.
The new Member States have in principle only reported on legislation that was adopted or came into force after 1 May 2004.
ﾚlenskê stâty ohlâsily p┼ijetî velmi rozli┘nþch opat┼enî, j e Š majî zlepùit ochranu finan┘nîch zâjm╉ Spole┘enstvî: opat┼enî pro boj proti pranî ùpinavþch pen┞z nebo proti korupci, stra-tegie pro boj proti podvod╉m na vnitrostâtnî úrovni, rozùî┼enî oblasti celnîch ùet┼enî, ùirùî vymezenî n┞kterþch trestnþch ┘in╉, aby mezi n┞ byly zahrnuty ùkody zp╉sobenê evropskê-mu rozpo┘tu, zlepùenî finan┘nî kontroly nebo postupy po┘îta┘ovêho zpracovânî dat atd.
The Member States indicated that they had adopted very wide-ranging measures aimed at improving the protection of the Communities' financial interests: measures to counter money laundering or corruption, national anti-fraud strategies, widening of the area of customs investigations, extension of the definition of certain offences so as to include attacks on the European budget, improvements in financial controls, or procedures for the processing of data held on computers and so on.
V roce 2004 byl v Belgii p┼ijat novþ zâkon o boji proti pranî ùpinavþch pen┞z.
In 2004, a new act was adopted in Belgium to combat money laundering.
Stanovî, Še útvar pro zpracovânî finan┘nîch informacî musî nynî informovat ministerstvo financî o tom, Še prokuratu┼e p┼edal informace tþkajîcî se pranî ùpinavþch pen┞z nebo majetku pochâzejîcîho z trestnê ┘innosti spjatê se z â v a Š n þ m i a organizovanþmi da┵ovþmi podvody.
It requires the unit responsible for handling financial information to notify the Ministry of Finance when information is provided to the public prosecutor on money or property laundering result-ing from an offence relating to serious organised tax fraud.
Toto ustanovenî se tþkâ rovn┞Š podvod╉ poùkozujîcîch rozpo┘et Spole┘enstvî.
The act also concerns fraud affecting the Community budget.
Lotyùskâ vlâda p┼ijala pro obdobî let 2004«2008 obùîrnþ program boje proti korupci.
The Latvian government has adopted an extensive anti-corruption programme for 2004«08.