natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
àstava pﾖinèþó podstatn̅ pokrok pokud jde o zjednoduþenó a racionalizaci rozhodovacóch procesヮ a nèstrojヮ ｲinnosti.
The Constitution makes important progress regarding the appointment of the President of the Commission, who is in future to be elected by the European Parliament on a proposal by the European Council, acting by a quali«edmajority.
V̅hody s ohledem na ÿｲinnost tｸchto procesヮ, jejich demokratickou legitimitu a transparentnost jsou zﾖejmï.
This is a further step in the process of imparting political legitimacy to the Commission, particularly as the European Council is required to take account of the elections to the European Parliament.
Dヮle™itï jsou dokonce i zmｸny terminologie, kterï pomohou obｲanヮm pochopit, kdo, o ｲem a jak v Unii rozhoduje.
Afterwards, the whole Commission, the President, the Minister for Foreign A.airs,whoisappointedby means of a special procedure (see below), and the Commissioners, selected by the Council in agreement withthe President-designate, will require a vote of approval en bloc by the European Parliament22.
Vytvoﾖenóm kategorie delegovan̅ch naﾖózenó, kterè umo™ﾏujó pﾖenïst pravomoc z legislativnóho orgènu (Evropskïho parlamentu a Rady) na Komisi, se zv̅þó v̅konnost Unie, proto™e zèkonodèrnï orgèny se nebudou muset zab̅vat technick̅mi detaily, kterï mヮ™e rychleji a vhodnｸji ﾖeþit exekutiva.
In s t i tffu t i on a l l y , the Minister w i l l wear two `hats': he will be responsible for conducting the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy, for which purpose he will chair the Foreign A . a i r s Council , p r e s en t p r o po s a l s and i m p l e m en t Council d e c iffs i on s , w h i l e a t the same time he will be a Vice-President of the Commission, taking on that institution's responsibilities in the «eldofexternalrelationsandcoordinatingall aspects of the EU's external action.
Pﾖenesenó pravomocó je doprovèzeno nezbytn̅mi zèrukami kontroly ze strany legislativnóho orgènu (prostﾖednictvóm ¶odvolacóhoƒ postupu), pﾖiｲem™ je zajiþtｸna ÿplnè rovnost mezi Evropsk̅m parlamentem a Radou24.
He will be assisted by a European External Action Service composed of o / c i a l s f r o m the Cffo m m iffs s i on , the G en e r a l Secretariat of the Council of Ministers and national diplomatic services, which is to be set up by decision of the Council after consulting the European Parliament and obtaining the approval of the Commission.
Novï legislativnó postupy: àstava jasnｸ klade dヮraz na ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup (kter̅ odpovódè stèvajócómu postupu spolurozhodovènó).
Thus the Minister will be a member of the Commission, but he will have a special status, re‹ectedintheproceduresforhisappointmentandthepossible ending of his tenure: he will be appointed by the European Council,
Oblast pヮsobnosti ﾖèdnïho legislativnóho postupu se podstatnｸ rozþóﾖila: pﾖibylo pﾖibli™nｸ padesèt nov̅ch prèvnóch zèkladヮ (ｲóm™ se jejich poｲet zv̅þil na 86), z nich™ jsou nｸkterï velmi dヮle™itï, jako napﾖ. ty, kterï se t̅kajó prostoru svobody, bezpeｲnosti a prèva, politiky zemｸdｸlstvó a rybolovu, evropskï oblasti v̅zkumu a de«niceprovèdｸcóch pravomocó (dosud ﾖózenï rèmcov̅m rozhodnutóm o komitologii) nebo stèvajócóho «nanｲnóho naﾖózenó (viz pﾖólohu 3).
The scope of the ordinary legislative procedure has been substantially expanded: some «ftynewlegalbases(bringingthetotalto86),someofwhich are of enormous importance, such as those concerning the area of freedom, security and justice, policy on agriculture and « s h e r i e s , the European research area and the de«nitionofimplementingpowers(hithertogoverned by the framework decision on comitology) or the current Financial Regulation (cf. Annex 3).
Ve vþech tｸchto oblastech u™ Rada nemヮ™e rozhodovat sama, ale pouze po dohodｸ s Parlamentem.
In all these « e l d s , the Council c a n n o l on g e r d e c i d e b y itself, but only in agreement with Parliament.
Bohu™el existuje stèle mnoho pﾖópadヮ, na nｸ™ se vztahujó zvlèþtnó legislativnó postupy, tak™e se mヮ™e stèt, ™e jeden orgèn schvèló akt za ÿｲasti jinïho orgènu, pﾖiｲem™ se tato ÿｲast mヮ™e pohybovat od souhlasu po pouhou konzultaci, a nｸkdy nenó v̅bｸr tohoto typu postupu niｲóm jin̅m ne™ v̅sledkem ÿstupkヮ, ke kter̅m doþlo v prヮbｸhu jednènó mezivlèdnó konference.
Regrettably, there are still too many cases in which special legislative procedures apply, so that one institution adopts an act withthe participation of the other institution - which may range from assent to mere consultation
Ve tﾖech pﾖópadech mヮ™e Evropsk̅ parlament schvèlit zèkon se souhlasem Rady25
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT`S OPINION ON THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION
Zèkon obsahujócó roｲnó rozpoｲet podlïhè zvlèþtnómu postupu pro spoleｲnï rozhodovènó mezi Evropsk̅m parlamentem a Radou (viz bod 8 nó™e).
The law containing the annual budget is subject to a special procedure for joint decision-making by the European Parliament and the Council (cf. point 8 below).
Pﾖes tyto v̅jimky je àstava bezpochyby zﾖeteln̅m pokrokem, pokud jde o ÿｲinnost a demokratickou legitimitu evropskïho zèkonodèrnïho procesu.
Despite these exceptions, the Constitution undeniably represents distinct progress in terms of the e / c i en c y and d e m o c r a t i c l e g i t i m a c y of European l a w - m a k in g .
Tento pokrok je doprovèzen podobn̅m pokrokem s ohledem na schvalovènó mezinèrodnóch dohod, kterï Unie uzavórè, a to dóky þirþómu uplatﾏovènó hlasovènó kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou v Radｸ a po™adavku na nutnost zóskènó souhlasu Evropskïho parlamentu (napﾖ. o dohodèch o provèdｸnó spoleｲnï obchodnó politiky).
This progress is accompanied by similar progress regarding the adoption of the international agreements concluded by the Union, thanks to the extension of the application of the quali«edmajorityvotingprocedureinthe Council and the requirement that the assent of the European Parliament be obtained (for example on agreements implementing the common commercial policy).
Finanｲnó prostﾖedky Unie
The Union's «nances
Jednou z otèzek, kterè podnótila nejvｸtþó diskusi, a to jak v Konventu, tak i na mezivlèdnó konferenci, byla reforma unijnóho systïmu «nancó, zejmïna postupu schvalovènó rozpoｲtu. Þlo o institucionalizaci systïmu, kter̅ v budoucnu umo™nó pﾖimｸﾖenï, transparentnó a demokratickï «nancovènó Unie a upevnó pravomoci Evropskïho parlamentu, jako™to souｲèsti rozpoｲtovïho orgènu tóm, ™e mu dè rozhodujócó slovo v pﾖópadｸ celïho rozpoｲtu, vｲetnｸ v̅dajヮ, kterï byly dosud oznaｲovèny jako ¶povinnïƒ, jako jsou napﾖ. v̅daje na spoleｲnou zemｸdｸlskou politiku a spoleｲnou politiku rybolovu.
One of the questions which gave rise to most debate, both at the Convention and at the Intergovernmental Conference, was reform of the Union's system of «nance,particularlythebudgetaryprocedure.Itwasamatter of institutionalising a system which in future would make it possible to « n a n c e the Union a d e q u a t e l y , t r a n s p a r en t l y and d e m o c r a t i c a l l y , and p a r t i c u l a r l y for the European Parliament to consolidate its powers as an arm of the budgetary authority by giving it a decisive say on the whole of the EU budget, including expenditure hitherto classi«edas`compulsory',suchasexpenditure on the common agricultural policy and the common «sheriespolicy.
Koneｲn̅ v̅sledek, aｲkoli je vcelku pozitivnó, je do urｲitï móry odrazem zmｸny dヮrazu kladenïho mezivlèdnó konferencó, kterè nepﾖijala vþechny nèvrhy Konventu.
The «nalresult,althoughpositiveoverall,tosomeextentrepresenteda change of emphasis by the Intergovernmental Conference, which did not entirely accept the Convention's proposals.
Konvent navrhoval tﾖóstupﾏov̅ model, kter̅ byl jednoduch̅ a vyrovnan̅:
The Convention had proposed a three-stage model which was simple and balanced:
- Rada by o zèkladnóch rysech a o stropu27 v pﾖópadｸ vlastnóch zdrojヮ i nadèle rozhodovala jednomyslnｸ (s nèsledn̅m schvèlenóm ｲlensk̅mi stèty v souladu s jejich pﾖósluþn̅mi ÿstavnómi zvyklostmi).
- the European Parliament and the Council would decide jointly on the Financial Perspective, which would be constitutionalised under the name `multiannual « n a n c i a l f r a m e w o r k ' ( the Council w o u l d d e c i d e b y a
- Evropsk̅ parlament a Rada by spoleｲnｸ rozhodovaly o «nanｲnómv̅hledu,kter̅ by byl v àstavｸ zakotven pod nèzvem ¶vócelet̅ «nanｲnórèmecƒ(potï,co by àstava veþla v platnost, by Rada kvali«kovanouvｸtþinourozhodovalaji™ o prvnóm «nanｲnómrèmci);
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT`S OPINION ON THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION quali«edmajorityasfromthe«rst«nancialframeworkaftertheentryinto force of the Constitution);
To znamenalo, ™e by si ｲlenskï stèty podr™ely rozhodovacó pravomoc pﾖi stanovovènó ｲèstky a povahy pﾖójmヮ Unie, ™e by obｸ souｲèsti rozpoｲtovïho orgènu musely souhlasit s plènovènóm v̅dajヮ a ™e by v pﾖópadｸ neshody ohlednｸ roｲnóho rozpoｲtu mohl mót Evropsk̅ parlament rozhodujócó slovo o celkov̅ch v̅dajóch (pﾖiｲem™ by se upustilo od rozliþovènó povinn̅ch a nepovinn̅ch v̅dajヮ), i kdy™ v mezóch stropヮ stanoven̅ch ve «nanｲnóm rèmci. Ve skuteｲnosti by to znamenalo, ™e by se oba orgèny musely dohodnout na spoleｲnïm pohledu na vｸc.
This meant that the Member States would continue to hold the key to the determination of the amount and nature of the Union's revenue, that the two arms of the budgetary authority would have to agree on the programming of expenditure and that, in the event of disagreement on the annual budget, the European Parliament could have the last word on overall expenditure (the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure being dropped), albeit within the limits of the ceilings imposed by the «nancialframework.Inpractice,thetwoinstitutionswouldthushavebeenstrongly encouraged to reconcile their views.
Mnoha ｲlensk̅m stètヮm se tento vyvè™en̅ systïm nelóbil a po celou dobu mezivlèdnó konference byly pﾖedklèdèny nèvrhy, kterï nｸkdy dokonce zèsadnóm zpヮsobem napadaly stèvajócó pravomoci Evropskïho parlamentu v tïto oblasti a pﾖedstavovaly riziko zniｲenó myþlenky «nanｲnó demokracie v Unii.
A large number of the Member States were unhappy with this balanced system, and throughout the Intergovernmental Conference proposals were submitted which in some cases even represented a serious assault on the European Parliament's existing powers in this «eldandrantheriskofdestroying the idea of « n a n c i a l d e m o c r a c y in the Union .
Pﾖedevþóm dóky ÿsiló zèstupcヮ Evropskïho parlamentu a italskïho a irskïho pﾖedsednictvó bylo mo™no dojót ke kompromisu, kter̅ podstatu prèv Parlamentu v tïto oblasti zachovèvè:
T h a n k s p a r t i c u l a r l y t o the e . o r t s of the r ep r e s en t a t i v e s of the European P a r l i a m en t and the I t a l i a n and Irish Presidencies, it proved possible to «ndacompromisewhichpreserves the essential aspects of Parliament's rights in this «eld:
- nèvrhy Konventu t̅kajócó se vlastnóch zdrojヮ byly pﾖijaty;
- the Convention's proposals on own resources were accepted;
- « n a n ｲ n ó r è m e c mffu s ó v ™ d y s c h v è l i t o b a o r g è n y , a l e Rada b u d e r o z h o do v a t j e d n o m y s l n ｸ do tï doby, ne™ Evropskè Rada rovnｸ™ jednomyslnｸ nerozhodne o tom, ™e Rada mヮ™e rozhodovat kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou;
- the «nancialframeworkmustalwaysbeadoptedbythetwoinstitutions,but the Council will decide unanimously until the European Council, also acting unanimously, decides that the Council may decide by a quali«edmajority;
- roｲnó rozpoｲet musó b̅t takï schvèlen spoleｲnｸ Evropsk̅m parlamentem a Radou, ale v pﾖópadｸ neshody musó b̅t postup znovu zahèjen tóm, ™e Komise pﾖedlo™ó nov̅ nèvrh rozpoｲtu.
- the annual budget is also adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, but in the event of disagreement the procedure must begin again withthe submission by the Commission of a new draft budget.
Toto ﾖeþenó zachovèvè, jak ji™ bylo uvedeno, zèkladnó aspekty rozpoｲtov̅ch pravomocó Evropskïho parlamentu: Parlament zóskèvè rozhodujócó slovo v pﾖópadｸ celïho rozpoｲtu, pﾖiｲem™ se ruþó rozliþovènó mezi povinn̅mi a nepovinn̅mi v̅daji.
As has already been said, this solution preserves the essential aspects of the European Parliament's budgetary powers: Parliament is given a decisive voice on the whole of budget, in view of the abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure.
Pèst III àstavy pojednèvajócó o ¶Politikèch a fungovènó Unieƒ obsahuje 322 ｲlènkヮ a je jejó nejvｸtþó ｲèstó.
Part III of the Constitution, concerning `The policies and functioning of the Union', consists of 322 articles and is the largest part.
Sklèdè se tïmｸﾖ v̅hradnｸ z ustanovenó, kterè jsou ve stèvajócóm znｸnó ji™ obsa™ena ve Smlouvèch a kterè se t̅kajó de«niceauplatﾏovènó sektorèlnóch politik, zejmïna prèvnóch zèkladヮ pro ｲinnost Unie v ka™dï z oblastó. Lze uva™ovat o tom, ™e mnohè z tｸchto ustanovenó mohla b̅t zjednoduþena nebo pﾖizpヮsobena vzhledem ke zmｸnèm, k nim™ doþlo od doby, kdy byla navr™ena.
It consists almost entirely of provisions which already exist in the treaties as they stand at present concerning the de«nitionandimplementationofsectoralpolicies,particularly the legal bases for the Union's action in each «eld.Itmaybeconsidered that many of these provisions could have been simpli«edoradjusted in the light of the changes which have occurred since they were drafted.
Je vþak skuteｲnostó, ™e mandèt, kter̅ Konvent od Evropskï rady zóskal, mu neumo™nil pﾖehodnotit tato ustanovenó zevrubnｸ.
But the fact is that the mandate which the European Council conferred on the Convention did not empower it to revise these provisions in depth.
Zmｸny v ｲèsti III jsou tak v podstatｸ dヮsledkem volby textヮ, kterï se dostaly do I. ｲèsti àstavnó smlouvy s ohledem na zruþenó ¶pilóﾖヮƒ, pravomocó Unie, institucó, rozhodovacóho procesu a prèvnóch nèstrojヮ.
Thus the changes made in Part III are essentially consequences of the choices made in Part I of the Constitutional Treaty regarding the abolition of the `pillars', the powers of the Union, the institutions, decision-making procedures and legal instruments.
Proto, kromｸ prostoru svobody, bezpeｲnosti a prèva (co™ je v podstatｸ b̅val̅ tﾖetó pilóﾖ) a vnｸjþóch vztahヮ, zejmïna v oblasti spoleｲnï zahraniｲnó a bezpeｲnostnó politiky, kde jsou zvlèþtｸ citlivï, se zmｸny v ostatnóch sektorèlnóch politikèch t̅kajó pﾖedevþóm pou™iteln̅ch postupヮ a rozdｸlenó prèvnóch zèkladヮ mezi legislativnó a nelegislativnó akty.
That is why, apart from the area of freedom, security and justice (essentially the former third pillar) and external relations, particularly the common foreign and security policy, where the changes are most sensitive, in the other sectoral policies the changes mainly concern the procedures applicable and the breakdown of legal bases between legislative and non-legislative acts.
To mヮ™e samo o sobｸ pﾖedstavovat zèruku vｸtþó ÿｲinnosti, demokratickï legitimity a transparentnosti ｲinnosti Unie s ohledem na pozitivnó charakter zmｸn, kterï jsme analyzovali v̅þe.
This in itself may already constitute a guarantee of greater e / c i en c y , d e m o c r a t i c l e g i t i m a c y and t r a n s p a r en c y of the Union ' s a c t i on in view of the positive character of the changes which we have analysed above.
Mimochodem lze poznamenat, ™e byla pﾖidèna ÿvodnó kapitola, kterè obsahuje horizontèlnó a prヮﾖezovï dolo™ky vztahujócó se na vþechny politiky bez rozdólu.
It may incidentally be noted that an initial chapter has been introduced which lists the horizontal or cross-cutting clauses which apply across the board to all policies.
Budeme se vｸnovat hlavnóm aspektヮm tｸchto zmｸn s cólem stanovit, zda umo™ﾏujó Unii v dan̅ch oblastech ÿｲinnｸjþó a demokratiｲtｸjþó fungovènó.
We shall review the main aspects of these changes, withthe aim of determining whether they enable the Union to act more e/cientlyanddemocraticallyinthe«eldsin question.
Prostor svobody, bezpeｲnosti a prèva
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
V oblasti vnitﾖnó politiky se nejvｸtþó zmｸny t̅kajó ustanovenó pojednèvajócóch o prostoru svobody, bezpeｲnosti a prèva s tóm, ™e dochèzó ke zruþenó pilóﾖovï struktury a soudnó spoluprèce v trestnóch vｸcech a policejnó spoluprèce (kterï byly doposud souｲèstó tﾖetóho pilóﾖe) se dostèvajó pod metodu ¶Spoleｲenstvóƒ pomocó rozþóﾖenó ﾖèdnïho legislativnóho postupu a hlasovènó kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou28.
In the internal policy sphere, the provisions dealing withthe area of freedom, security and justice are those where the greatest changes are to be found, with, in particular, the pillar structure being discontinued and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and police cooperation (which, up to now, have come under the third pillar) being brought under the `Community' method through the extension of the ordinary legislative procedure and quali«edmajority
EVROPSKä PARLAMENT SE VYSLOVUJE K EVROPSKÏ à S T A V V
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT`S OPINION ON THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION voting28.
Cóle politiky v tïto oblasti jsou ujasnｸny a de«novèny pﾖesnｸji. Pinnost na tomto poli musó b̅t v̅luｲnｸ v souladu se zèkladnómi prèvy.
The policy objectives in this area are clari«edandde«nedmoreprecisely.Union action is the area is explicitly made subject to compliance with fundamental rights.
Pﾖóstup k soudヮm pﾖedstavuje zèkladnó cól.
Access to justice is enshrined as a general objective.
Vzèjemnï uznèvènó rヮzn̅ch systïmヮ a pﾖibli™ovènó prèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ jsou pova™ovèny za dva soubｸ™nï zpヮsoby uplatﾏovènó politik.
Mutual recognition of the various systems and the approximation of laws are recognised as two parallel means of implementing policies.
Politiky t̅kajócó se kontrol na hranicóch, udｸlovènó azylu a pﾖistｸhovalectvó jsou pova™ovèny za spoleｲnï politiky Unie ﾖózenï zèsadami solidarity a spravedlivïho rozdｸlenó odpovｸdnosti mezi ｲlenskï stèty.
Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration are recognised as common policies of the Union, governed by the principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility among Member States.
àstava takï pﾖedstavuje velk̅ krok kupﾖedu v oblasti soudnó spoluprèce jak v obｲanskoprèvnóch, tak i v trestnóch vｸcech a v oblasti policejnó spoluprèce, zejmïna uplatﾏovènóm ﾖèdnïho legislativnóho postupu.
The Constitution also marks a major step forward as regards judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters and of police cooperation, mainly through the application of the ordinary legislative procedure.
Soudnó spoluprèce v obｲanskoprèvnóch vｸcech se rozþiﾖuje na vþechny zèle™itosti s pﾖeshraniｲnóm dopadem a je zalo™ena na zèsadｸ vzèjemnïho uznèvènó rozsudkヮ a rozhodnutó pﾖi mimosoudnóm ﾖeþenó pﾖópadヮ, pﾖiｲem™ ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup se uplatﾏuje na vþechna opatﾖenó ke sbli™ovènó prèva, s v̅jimkou opatﾖenó vztahujócóch se k rodinnïmu prèvu, kdy plató jednomyslnï rozhodovènó (zèkon Rady, pouze s konzultacó Parlamentu).
Judicial cooperation in civil matters is extended to all matters having cross border implications and is based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and decisions in extrajudicial cases, withthe ordinary legislative procedure applying to any measures for the approximation of laws, withthe exception of measures concerning family law, in which case unanimity is the rule (Council law, with Parliament merely being consulted).
Avþak sama Rada mヮ™e jednomyslnｸ rozhodnout, ™e rozþóﾖó ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup na nｸkterï aspekty rodinnïho prèva s pﾖeshraniｲnóm dopadem.
However, the Council may itself decide unanimously to extend the ordinary legislative procedure to cover some aspects of family law with cross-border implications.
Nejvｸtþó zmｸnou s ohledem na soudnó spoluprèci v trestnóch vｸcech je, ™e ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup (kvali«kovanè vｸtþina) se bude uplatﾏovat na oblast sbli™ovènó prèva se vztahem k procesnóm zèle™itostem (minimèlnó pravidla k usnadnｸnó vzèjemnïho uznèvènó rozsudkヮ a soudnóch rozhodnutó apod.) a trestnó prèvo hmotnï, pﾖiｲem™ pro de«novènó nｸkter̅ch zèva™n̅ch trestn̅ch ｲinヮ s pﾖeshraniｲnóm dopadem uveden̅ch v àstavｸ a pro postihy budou platit minimèlnó pﾖedpisy. àstava dokonce uvèdó, ™e Rada mヮ™e jednomysln̅m rozhodnutóm stanovit dalþó aspekty trestnóho ﾖózenó a dalþó oblasti kriminality, na nｸ™ se bude vztahovat ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup.
The major innovation as regards judicial cooperation in criminal matters is that the ordinary legislative procedure (quali«edmajority)istobeusedforthe approximation of laws covering both procedural matters (minimum rules to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions, etc.) and substantive criminal law, with minimum rules concerning the de«nitionofsome serious crimes with cross-border dimensions listed in the Constitution, and sanctions.
Nｸkterï ｲlenskï stèty byly zèsadnï proti tomu nehledｸ na zèruky, ™e evropskï zèkony v tïto oblasti musejó respektovat zèkladnó aspekty prèvnóch systïmヮ ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
The Constitution even provides that the Council may, acting unanimously, identify other aspects of criminal procedure and other areas of crime to which the ordinary legislative procedure may apply.
EVROPSKä PARLAMENT SE VYSLOVUJE K EVROPSKÏ à S T A V V nebo pokud by nov̅ legislativnó postup zahèjen̅ na jejó ™èdost nebyl ukonｲen do dvanècti mｸsócヮ, bude v tïto zèle™itosti automaticky ustavena posólenè spoluprèce, jestli™e to podpoﾖó jedna tﾖetina ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ.
Should the European Council fail to take a decision within the four-month period, or should the new legislative procedure opened at its request not be completed within twelve months, enhanced cooperation shall be established in the matter automatically if one third of the Member States are in favour.
Parlament mヮ™e takï uvótat, ™e mezivlèdnó konference pﾖes znaｲn̅ odpor nｸkolika delegacó pﾖijala nèvrh Konventu na zﾖózenó àﾖadu evropskïho veﾖejnïho ™alobce, jeho™ ÿkolem bude potórat pﾖestupky proti «nanｲnóm zèjmヮm Unie a kter̅ mヮ™e pachatele takov̅ch pﾖestupkヮ stóhat. àstava vþak po™aduje, aby byl evropsk̅ zèkon ustavujócó tento ÿﾖad pﾖijat Radou jednomyslnｸ potï, co k tomu dè Parlament souhlas. ¶Pﾖemosﾝujócó dolo™kuƒ (¶passerelleƒ) lze pou™ót k mo™nïmu rozþóﾖenó odpovｸdnosti tohoto ÿﾖadu, aby zahrnovala potórènó zèva™n̅ch trestn̅ch ｲinヮ s pﾖeshraniｲnóm dopadem, a to pomocó evropskïho rozhodnutó, kterï jednomyslnｸ pﾖijme Rada po obdr™enó souhlasu Evropskïho parlamentu.
Parliament can also welcome the fact that the Intergovernmental Conference adopted the Convention's proposal for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's O/ce which has responsibility for combating o.encesagainst the Union's «nancialinterestsandmayprosecutetheperpetratorsofsuch o.ences,despitestrongoppositionfromseveraldelegations.However,the Constitution stipulates that the Council law establishing the o/cemustbe adopted unanimously once Parliament has given its consent. A `bridging clause' (`passerelle') nonetheless provides for the possible extension of the o/ce'sresponsibilitiestocoveractiontocombatseriouscrimeswitha cross-border dimension, by means of a European decision adopted unanimously by the Council after Parliament has given its consent.
A koneｲnｸ byl ﾖèdn̅ legislativnó postup zaveden takï pro policejnó spoluprèci, aｲkoli jednomyslnost je zachovèna v pﾖópadｸ operaｲnó spoluprèce a zèsahヮ pﾖósluþn̅ch ÿﾖadヮ jednoho ｲlenskïho stètu na ÿzemó jinïho ｲlenskïho stètu.
Lastly, the ordinary legislative procedure has also been introduced for police cooperation, although unanimity continues to be rule for operational cooperation and intervention by the competent authorities of one Member State on the territory of another Member State.
Dalþó vnitﾖnó politiky
Other internal policies
Kromｸ zavedenó nｸkolika nov̅ch prèvnóch zèkladヮ pro ¶novïƒ › ｲi jasnｸji stanovenï › kompetence v I. ｲèsti jsou zmｸny, kterï àstava pﾖinèþó v jin̅ch sektorèlnóch politikèch, v̅sledkem ustavenó spolurozhodovènó (a tedy hlasovènó kvali«kovanouvｸtþinou) jako™to ﾖèdnïho legislativnóho postupu a rozdｸlenó mezi legislativnó a nelegislativnó akty tak, jak je to nynó de«novèno.
Aside from the introduction of a few new legal bases for `new' - or more clearly d e « n e d - cffo m p e t en c e s in P a r t I , the c h a n g e s w h i c h the C on s t i tffu t i on m a k e s to the other sectoral policies stem mainly from the establishment of codecision (and thus quali«edmajorityvoting)astheordinarylegislativeprocedure and the breakdown between legislative and non-legislative acts as now de«ned.