natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
‡ terïnnó prèce se zapojenóm pﾖójemcヮ v̅hod, zejmïna dｸtó a mlède™e, do vþech etap nèvrhu projektu, jeho realizace a vyhodnocovènó;
«eldworkwiththeinvolvementofthebene«ciaries,particularlychildrenandyouth,in all phases of project design, implementation and evaluation;
‡ þkolenó a nèvrh vzdｸlèvacóch balókヮ;
‡ training and design of educational packages;
‡ v̅voj a realizace lïｲebn̅ch programヮ a podpory pro obｸti a ohro™enï lidi, vｲetnｸ dｸtó a mlède™e, kteﾖó jsou svｸdkem domècóho nèsiló;
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes and support for victims and people at risk, including children and young people who witness domestic violence;
‡ v̅voj a realizace lïｲebn̅ch programヮ pro pachatele, pﾖiｲem™ bude zaruｲena bezpeｲnost obｸtó a dｸtó;
‡ development and implementation of treatment programmes for perpetrators, whilst ensuring the safety of victims and children;
‡ rozvoj a realizace aktivit ke zvyþovènó povｸdomó, cólen̅ch na konkrïtnó skupiny lidó, nè-vrh materièlヮ doplﾏujócóch existujócó aktivity nebo ÿprava a vyu™itó stèvajócóch materièlヮ v jin̅ch zemｸpisn̅ch oblastech ｲi pro jinï cólovï skupiny;
‡ development and implementation of awareness-raising activities targeted to speci«caudi-ences, design of materials to supplement those already available, or adaptation and use of existing materials in other geographical areas or for other target groups;
‡ þóﾖenó v̅sledkヮ dosa™en̅ch v rèmci programu Daphne I a II vｲetnｸ jejich ÿpravy, pﾖeno-su a vyu™itó jin̅mi pﾖójemci v̅hod nebo v jin̅ch zemｸpisn̅ch oblastech;
‡ dissemination of the results obtained under the Daphne I and II programmes including their adaptation, transfer and use by other bene«ciariesorinothergeographicalareas;
‡ stanovenó a v̅voj aktivit pﾖispóvajócóch k pozitivnómu jednènó pro lidi bezbrannï vヮｲi nèsiló, to jest k pﾖóstupu, kter̅ podporuje ÿctu k nim a napomèhè jejich tｸlesnï i duþev-nó pohodｸ a seberealizaci.
‡ assessment and development of activities contributing to positive treatment for people vulnerable to violence, that is to an approach which encourages respect for them and pro-motes their well-being and self-ful«lment.
c) Komise rovnｸ™ dala stranou pﾖibli™nｸ 15 % rozpoｲtu programu, aby mｸla mo™nost zlepþit jeho efekt a mohla hrèt aktivnｸjþó ÿlohu pﾖi þóﾖenó sprèvn̅ch postupヮ. T̅kè se to pﾖedevþóm tﾖó druhヮ ｲinnostó.
(c) The Commission has also set aside around 15 % of the budget of the programme in order to enable the Commission to improve the programme's impact and to play a more proac-tive rule with a view to the dissemination of good practices. Activities to be covered are threefold.
Za prvï je tﾖeba vytvoﾖit ukazatele móry nèsiló, kterï by umo™nily mｸﾖit kvanti«kovan̅efektpostupヮaprojektヮ.Komisebudenavócusilovatovytvoﾖenópostupupo pravideln̅ a trval̅ sbｸr ÿdajヮ, nejlïpe s pomocó EUROSTATU, aby mohla pﾖesnｸji vyｲós-lit móru nèsiló v EU.
In complement to these indicators, it will seek to set up a procedure for regular and sustainable data collection, preferably with the assist-ance of Eurostat, in order to be able to quantify violence in the Union more accurately.
Za druhï je tﾖeba se tam, kde to bude mo™nï, na zèkladｸ v̅sledkヮ prèce dosa™en̅ch «nancovan̅miprojekty,soustﾖeditnaextrahovènóavyvozenópolitick̅chotè-zek s cólem navrhnout spoleｲnou politiku k ﾖeþenó problïmu nèsiló na ÿrovni Spoleｲenstvó a posólit soudnó praxi.
A second axis will be to extract and deduce policy issues, wherever possible, from the work achieved by funded projects, with the aim of suggesting common policies on violence at Community level and reinforcing judicial practice.
A koneｲnｸ tﾖetóm ÿkolem bude þóﾖit sprèvnï postupy, je™ vyplynou z «nancovan̅chprojektヮ,vceloevropskïmmｸﾖótku.
Finally, the third axis would be to dis-seminate, on a Europe-wide scale, good practices stemming from funded projects.
V prvnóm roce existence iniciativy DAPHNE (1997) byla v̅zva k pﾖedlo™enó nèvrhヮ dosti kon-krïtnｸ zamｸﾖena na nèsledujócó priority:
In the « r s tffy e a r o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e ( 1 9 9 7 ) , t h e c a l l f o r p r o po s a l s w a s f a i r l y s p e c i « cffo n priority actions to be taken:
‡ vytvoﾖenó nov̅ch ｲi posólenó stèvajócóch sótó na evropskï ÿrovni za ÿｲelem podpory a koor-dinace v̅mｸny informacó a realizace ｲinnostó souvisejócóch s opatﾖenómi zamｸﾖen̅mi na ochranu dｸtó, mlède™e a ™en a na prevenci nèsiló na nich pèchanï, vｲetnｸ podpory spolu-prèce nevlèdnóch a dobrovoln̅ch organizacó a orgènヮ pヮsobócóch v tｸchto oblastech;
‡ setting up networks or reinforcement of networks at European level to promote and coor-dinate information and actions on measures aimed at protecting, and preventing violence towards children, young people and women, including the promotion of cooperation be-tween NGOs and voluntary organisations and authorities involved in these areas;
‡ podpora zﾖózenó ¶dｸtskï linky dヮvｸryƒ na podobnïm zèkladｸ ve vþech ｲlensk̅ch stètech;
‡ promotion of the establishment of a `child helpline' on a similar basis in every Member State;
‡ pﾖijetó zvlèþtnóch opatﾖenó na evropskï ÿrovni pro ochranu dｸtó, mlède™e a ™en; tyto skupi-ny musó b̅t pﾖedmｸtem primèrnóho zèjmu v rèmci vþech aktivit, kterï se jich t̅kajó, pﾖiｲem™ je tﾖeba zajistit, aby mohly vyu™óvat sv̅ch prèv bez jakïkoli diskriminace;
‡ special measures at European level for the protection of children, young people and wom-en, with primary consideration being given to them in all actions concerning them, their rights being enjoyed without discrimination of any kind;
‡ pilotnó projekty a dotace nevlèdnóm nebo dobrovoln̅m organizacóm, je™ usilujó o dosa™enó tｸchto cólヮ, hèjó prèva dｸtó, mlède™e a ™en a chrènó je, zejmïna v souvislosti se sexuèlnóm zneu™óvènóm.
‡ pilot projects and subsidies to NGOs or voluntary organisations working towards these aims, in particular working for the rights and the protection of children, young people and women, in particular regarding sexual abuse.
Priority z roku 1997 jasnｸ re‹ektovalypolitickïcótｸnóstojócózainiciativouvyvolanou¶Dutrou-xovou afïrouƒ v Belgii a Svｸtov̅m kongresem proti komerｲnómu sexuèlnómu zneu™óvènó dｸtó.
The 1997 priorities clearly re‹ectedthepoliticalimpetusbehindtheinitiativeinthewakeofthe `Dutroux a . a i r ' i n B e l g i u m a n d t h e W o r l d Cffo n g r e s s a g a i n s t Cffo m mffe r c i a l S e x u a l E x p l o i t a - t i o n of Children.
Sexuèlnó nèsiló je zmiﾏovèno ve tﾖech ze þesti uveden̅ch opatﾖenó a v̅zva k ｲinnostem ¶zamｸ-ﾖen̅m na rozbitó mezinèrodnóch sótó pedo«lヮƒjejasnou,ikdy™nerealistickoureakcónatehdej-þó volènó veﾖejnosti a politick̅ch kruhヮ.
Sexual violence is mentioned in three of the six stated measures and the call for actions `aimed at tackling international paedophile rings' is a clear if unrealistic echo of public and political concerns of the time.
Ve skuteｲnosti bylo nepravdｸpodobnï, ™e by se ne-vlèdnó organizace samy pova™ovaly za vhodnï iniciètory ｲinnostó cólen̅ch na rozbitó mezinè-rodnóch sótó pedo«lヮ,stejnｸjakoto,™ebyv̅bｸrovèkomisevytvoﾖenèscólemposouditpﾖed-lo™enï nèvrhy hodnotila pﾖóznivｸ jak̅koliv projekt, kter̅ by vykazoval neznalost toho, ™e kompetence nevlèdnóch organizacó majó v oblastech, kterï jednoznaｲnｸ spadajó do pヮsobnos-ti policejnóho vyþetﾖovènó a donucovacóch orgènヮ, svï meze.
In fact, it was unlikely that NGOs would consider themselves as the appropriate instigators of actions targeting international paedophile rings and indeed it is unlikely that the selection panel formed to review the submissions would have looked favourably on any project that demonstrated ignorance of the limits of NGO actions in what is clearly primarily a police investigation and law-enforcement task.
V̅zva k vytvoﾖenó linky dヮvｸry, kterè by pヮsobila na celïm ÿzemó Spoleｲenstvó, rovnｸ™ po-chèzela ze seznamu politick̅ch pﾖènó a ne ze zkuþenostó s pracó v terïnu. V devadesèt̅ch letech byla v Evropｸ vytvoﾖena ﾖada ÿspｸþn̅ch nèrodnóch linek dヮvｸry pro dｸti (napﾖ. ve Spojenïm krèlovstvó a v Itèlii) a je pochopitelnï, ™e si Komise mo™nè pﾖèla zvè™it mo™nost pﾖópadnïho rozþóﾖenó tïto zkuþenosti na celï Spoleｲenstvó.
The call for a Community-wide child helpline was also from the political wish-list rather than from «eldexperience.Therehadbeenanumberofsuccessfulnationalchildren'shelplinessetup in Europe (in the UK, for example, and in Italy) in the 1990s, and it is understandable that the Commission might have wished to explore the possibility of extending this experience across the Community.
V praxi vþak ﾖada takov̅ch snah ukèzala › jak v rèmci projektヮ « n a n c o v a n ̅ c hz D A P H N E , t a k p r o s t ﾖ e d n i c t v ó m p r a c o v n ó k o n f e r e n c ep o d p o - r o v a n ï v̅zkumem v EU a svolanï samotnou Komisó v roce 1998 › ™e je v dヮsledku rヮznorod̅ch a hluboce zakoﾖenｸn̅ch technick̅ch, u™ivatelsk̅ch a logistick̅ch postupヮ v ｲlensk̅ch stètech nemo™nï vytvoﾖit slu™bu typu linky dヮvｸry ｲinnï v rèmci celïho Spoleｲenstvó (alespoﾏ ne v danï realitｸ tehdejþó telefonnó technologie, struktur a jejich u™itó).
In practice, however, a number of exploratory e . o r t s bo t h i n D a p h n e - f u n d e d projects, and through a working conference supported by EU-wide research and con-vened by the Commission itself in 1998, showed that varied and deeply established technical, u s e r - p r o « l e a n d l o g i s t i c a l i s s u e s i n t h e Mffe m b e r S t a t e s m a d e a s i n g l e Cffo m mstu n i tffy - w i d e h e l - p l i n e service impossible to achieve (at least given realities then current in telephone technol-ogy, structures and use).
Kritïria pro v̅bｸr projektヮ byla postavena spóþe na realitｸ a vychèzela z rozumnïho posou-zenó modalit nastónｸn̅ch Stockholmskou deklaracó a Akｲnóm programem a z podpory evrop-skï pﾖidanï hodnoty ze strany Komise.
The selection criteria for projects were much more grounded in reality, deriving from a judi-cious coming-together of the modalities outlined in the Stockholm Declaration and Agenda for Action and the Commission's encouragement of European added value.
Nèvrhy mｸly splﾏovat nèsledujócó kritïria:
Proposals were to meet the following criteria:
‡ schopnost prezentovat pﾖidanou hodnotu na ÿrovni Evropskï unie › projekty zamｸﾖenï nejen na bezprostﾖednó (móstnó, regionèlnó nebo nèrodnó) situaci, ale i ty, jejich™ cólem je pﾖispｸt k rozvoji na evropskï ÿrovni;
‡ ability to present added value at European Union level ̌ projects focusing not only on the immediate (local, regional or national) situation but seeking to contribute to development at a European level;
‡ inovace z hlediska obsahu a organizace;
‡ innovation in terms of content and organisation;
‡ snaha o podporu nejlepþóho postupu v dotyｲnï(̅ch) oblasti(ech);
‡ aims to promote best practice in the area(s) concerned;
‡ mo™nost þirþóho uplatnｸnó v̅sledkヮ; nèvrh obsahuje v̅sledkovï ukazatele ve vztahu k vy-tyｲen̅m cólヮm a takï pﾖesnｸ stanovenï zèsady pro porovnèvènó dosa™en̅ch v̅sledkヮ s tｸmito ukazateli.
‡ a target of transferable results, containing result indicators related to the objectives, with detailed provisions for monitoring against these indicators.
Komise byla pﾖesvｸdｲena, ™e tematickï a programovï cóle nastónｸnï ve v̅zvｸ k pﾖedklèdènó nèvrhヮ budou pravdｸpodobnｸ splﾏovat ty projekty, kterï zahrnujó nèsledujócó ｲinnosti:
The Commission believed that the thematic and programmatic aims outlined in the call for proposals were most likely to be achieved through projects that included the following ac-tivities:
‡ þkolenó a v̅mｸny, hlavnｸ pro personèl nevlèdnóch organizacó a soukrom̅ch sdru™enó;
‡ training and exchanges, primarily for personnel of NGOs and private associations;
‡ pilotnó projekty vykazujócó jasn̅ evropsk̅ zèjem a pﾖidanou hodnotu;
‡ pilot projects demonstrating clear European interest and value added;
‡ vytvèﾖenó nov̅ch nebo posilovènó stèvajócóch evropsk̅ch sótó, zejmïna podpora a koordi-nace v̅mｸny informacó a zamｸﾖenó na ochranu a prevenci;
‡ the setting-up or reinforcement of European networks, particularly for the promotion and coordination of information and focused on protection and prevention;
‡ studie a v̅zkum;
‡ studies and research;
‡ podpora spoluprèce mezi nevlèdnómi organizacemi a orgèny veﾖejnï moci, vｲetnｸ donu-covacóch a soudnóch orgènヮ.
‡ promotion of cooperation between NGOs and public authorities, including law-enforce-ment and judicial bodies.
Pﾖesto™e tato kritïria, cóle a priority pﾖedstavovaly obrovskou v̅zvu pro plènovacó kapacitu nevlèdnóch organizacó, z nich™ se mnohï zab̅valy ochranou dｸtó spóþe vþeobecnｸ, nikoli vþak konkrïtnｸ nèsilóm a zﾖódkakdy na celoevropskï ÿrovni, bylo 47 projektヮ vybran̅ch v roce 1997 dobﾖe zamｸﾖeno a uspｸlo pﾖi ¶slaｵovènóƒ rヮznorod̅ch zèsad Komise.
Although these criteria, aims and priorities presented a formidable challenge to the planning capacity of NGOs, many of whom had worked broadly in child protection but not speci«callyon violence and rarely at pan-European level, the 47 projects selected in 1997 were well fo-cused and succeeded in `tuning in' to the Commission's multi-faceted guidelines.
Proto™e iniciativa (a program) DAPHNE zahrnuje spóþe projekty volnｸ pﾖedklèdanï samotn̅mi navrhovateli ne™ projekty s pﾖedem urｲen̅m zamｸﾖenóm, zèvisó obsah projektヮ zcela na tom, na ｲem si navrhujócó organizace pﾖejó pracovat (v rèmci dan̅ch obecn̅ch zèsad).
Since the Daphne initiative and programme comprise projects submitted rather than projects commissioned, the eventual focus of the projects depends entirely on what the proposing organisations wish to work on (within the general guidelines provided).
V dヮsledku toho se pﾖi druhï v̅zvｸ k pﾖedlo™enó nèvrhヮ v bﾖeznu 1998 objevily ¶jistï mezeryƒ, a nｸkterï oblasti tak zヮstaly nepoktryty. V̅zva z roku 1998 proto obsahovala v̅ｲet tｸchto oblastó a jejich pokrytó se mｸlo stèt prioritou.
Consequently, by the second call for proposals in March 1998, there were already `gaps' in the range of project ac-tivity being undertaken, so the 1998 call listed these areas and stated that priority would be given to «llingthem.
Na zèkladｸ zkuþenosti z roku 1997 se ji™ v obecnï v̅zvｸ k pﾖedklèdènó nèvrhヮ neobjevil po-
The lessons of 1997 had been well learned and the call for proposals to set up an EU-wide helpline was not repeated in the general call (9).
™adavek na vytvoﾖenó celoevropskï linky dヮvｸry (9). Vþeobecnè opatﾖenó namósto toho zahr- n o v a l a : k p ┼ e d l o Š e n î projektu, kterþ by tuto z â l e Š i t o s t d╉kladn┞ analyzoval, byla vydâna v roce 1999 a p┼edchâzela jî sch╉zka vùech provozovatel╉ linek d╉v┞ry z EU a n┞kterþch kandidâtskþch zemî, kterou po┼âdala Komise spole┘n┞ s organizacî UNICEF.
) In fact, a separate call for a project in which this issue could be researched thoroughly was issued in 1999 and preceded by a meeting of all European helpline operators, and some from the candidate countries, jointly hosted by the Commission and Unicef. 葵emeetingcon#rmedthedivergence of opinions and structures, and the subsequent round of project submissions proved to be inadequate, focusing more on extending current national experience rather than fully exploring the divergences and potential noted in the conference.
‡ podporu zavèdｸnó nèstrojヮ, kterï majó podnótit obｲany, aby upozorﾏovali na nèsiló pèchanï proti dｸtem, mlède™i a ™enèm a na formy obchodovènó se ™enami za ÿｲelem sexuèlnóho vykoﾖisﾝovènó v souladu s ujednènómi, kterè jsou podobnè ve vþech ｲlensk̅ch stètech.
‡ promoting the introduction of instruments designed to encourage the reporting of vio-lence against children, young people and women, and forms of tra/ckinginwomenforthe purpose of sexual exploitation in accordance with arrangements which are similar in all Member States.
Tóm zヮstèvajó otevﾖenï mo™nosti pro þirþó vyu™itó ohlaþovacóch mechanismヮ, kterï pﾖesahujó pouhï telefonnó linky dヮvｸry (napﾖóklad stﾖediska drop-in, policejnó linky pomoci atd.).
This left the possibilities open for broader exploration of reporting mechanisms beyond telephone helplines (for example drop-in centres, police help-desks, etc.).
Nerealistickè v̅zva k ¶rozbójenó mezinèrodnóch sótó pedo«lヮƒbylavyþkrtnutazeseznamupri-orit a novｸ a vhodnｸji de«novènavsouvislostisｲinnostónevlèdnóchorganizacó,vrèmcise-znamu oblastó, kterï nebyly odpovódajócóm zpヮsobem pokryty, jako:
The unrealistic call for projects `to tackle international paedophile rings' was removed from the priority areas and r e d e « n e d i n m o r e a p p r op r i a t e N G O t e r m s i n t h e l i s t o f ` a r e a s w h i c h h a v e nffo t yet been adequately covered' as:
‡ ochrana dｸtó pﾖed pedo«lnóaktivitousnahouolepþópochopenópovahypedo«lnóhocho-vènó, recidivy, v̅znamu pedo«lnóchsótóapraktikovènópornogra«e.
‡ protecting children from paedophile activity by increasing understanding of the nature of paedophile behaviour, recidivism and the role of paedophile networking and use of pornography, thus becoming a research/understanding action rather than direct `tackling'.
V pﾖóloze nazvanï ¶Souhrn oblastó aktivit, jimi™ se zab̅vè program z roku 1997, a urｲit̅ch ob-lastó, kterï nebyly dosud pokrytyƒ byl uｲinｸn prvnó pokus vyzvat organizace k tomu, aby se vyvarovaly duplikace ji™ realizovan̅ch ｲinnostó, a buｵ diverzi«kovalyadèlerozvójely,nebo, v ideèlnóm pﾖópadｸ, rozþiﾖovaly dosa™enï v̅sledky na zèkladｸ souｲasn̅ch zkuþenostó ｲi ma-terièlヮ v dalþóch ｲlensk̅ch stètech.
In an annex entitled `Summary of the areas of activity covered by the programme in 1997 and of certain areas not yet covered', «rstattemptsweremadetoencourageorganisationstoavoidduplicating actions that had already been taken and to either diversify or develop ways to build on previous experience, ideally by broadening the application of existing experiences, lessons or materials to other Member States. Gaps identi«edwere:
‡ identi«kacefaktorヮaskupinohro™enostianazèkladｸtohovytvoﾖenóochrann̅chmecha-nismヮ › opｸt pokus prosadit pochopenó jako zèklad jednènó;
‡ the identi«cationofvulnerabilityfactorsandgroupsandthedevelopmentofprotectionmechanisms based on these ̌ again an attempt to prompt understanding as a basis for action;
‡ ÿloha uｲitelヮ, peｲovatelヮ, sourozencヮ, rodiny, spoleｲnosti a dalþóch potencièlnóch ochrèn-cヮ; otèzka, jak maximalizovat jejich vliv v souvislosti s ochranou ™en a dｸtó pﾖed zneu™óvènóm › struｲn̅ pokus nalïzt zpヮsob, jak mobilizovat ochrannï ｲinitele obｲanskï spoleｲnosti a dèt jim vｸtþó moc;
‡ the role of teachers, carers, siblings, family, society and other potential protectors and how to maximise their impact to protect women and children from abuse ̌ a concise attempt to «ndwaystomobiliseandempowercivilsocietyprotectionagents;
‡ znèmky zneu™óvènó › jak je rozpoznat a upozornit na nｸ, s ohledem na intervenci bｸhem zneu™óvènó › dヮle™itè a cólenè verze ¶zvyþovènó povｸdomó o problïmuƒ, jeho™ cólem je po-skytnout takovï nèstroje, aby ti, kdo mohou obｸﾝ ochrènit pﾖed zneu™óvènóm, umｸli rozpo-znat, kdy je tﾖeba jednat, zastavit zneu™óvènó a podpoﾖit obｸﾝ;
‡ the signs of abuse and how to recognise and report them with a view to intervening during abuse ̌ an important, targeted version of `awareness-raising' which aimed to provide tools so that those who are in a position to protect from abuse can recognise when they should act to stop the abuse and support the victim;
‡ soudnó systïm pro mladistvï a ochrana obｸti pﾖed mo™nostó opｸtovnïho napadenó › pro-blïm objevujócó se na mezinèrodnó ÿrovni a v Evropｸ, zejmïna v souvislosti s kriminalizacó obｸtó obchodovènó s lidmi;
‡ juvenile justice and protecting the victim from being re-victimised ̌ an emerging issue at international level and in Europe in particular in relation to the criminalisation of tra/ck-ing victims;
‡ vzory chovènó zneu™óvajócóch osob a metody trestnó spoluprèce › dヮle™it̅ prvnó krok inter-venovènó do oblasti pヮsobenó pachatele a dヮle™itï uvｸdomｸnó si potﾖeby pochopit, jak pachatelï praktikujó svou ｲinnost;
‡ behaviour patterns of abusers and methods of criminal cooperation ̌ an important «rststep in intervening in the area of the perpetrator and an important statement of the need to understand how they work;
‡ mechanismy na podporu zneu™óvan̅ch ™en a dｸtó, efektivnó upozorﾏovènó na v̅skyt zne-u™óvènó a efektivnó zèsah › prvnó zmónka o konkrïtnó pﾖómï podpヮrnï ｲinnosti; nèsledkem toho je DAPHNE v kruzóch nevlèdnóch organizacó pova™ovèn za program, v jeho™ ¶centru stojó obｸtiƒ;
‡ support mechanisms for women and children being abused and e.ectivereportingandintervention ̌ « r s t mffe n t i o nffo f s p e c i « c d i r e c t s up po r t a c t i o n , w h i c h l e d t o D a p h n e b e i n g cffo n s i d e r e d in NGO circles as a `victim-based' programme;
‡ mechanismy svïpomoci pro obｸti nèsiló › nèvrh na podporu aktivnóho zapojenó obｸtó a zlepþenó jejich mo™nosti se brènit; tïma, kterï prヮbｸ™nｸ doprovèzó iniciativu i program DAPHNE;
‡ statistical overviews of patterns of abuse, demographic trends, vulnerable groups, etc. ̌ recognition of the dire paucity of statistical mapping of the problem of violence in Europe, a recurring theme in subsequent years;
‡ zmｸna chovènó pachatelヮ a obｸtó › navrhuje zamyslet se nad mo™nostó pﾖejót od ¶zvyþovè-nó povｸdomó o problïmuƒ ke zmｸnｸ chovènó;
‡ behaviour modi«cationofabusersandvictimšsuggestingthoughtonwaystomovebeyond `awareness-raising' to promote actual change in behaviour;
‡ prèvo na zachovènó soukromó a odhalovènó informacó › reakce na anal̅zu nèvrhヮ z prvnóho roku, kdy mnoho projektヮ vykazovalo þpatnï pochopenó prèva na zachovènó soukromó › jak u obｸtó, tak u pachatelヮ › nezbytn̅ pﾖedpoklad jakïkoli prèce na sbｸru a uklèdènó dat;
‡ role of privacy and disclosure ̌ a response to analysis of the «rstyear'sproposals,wheremany projects demonstrated poor understanding of the rights of con«dentialityofbothvictims and perpetrators, and a prerequisite for any work on data collection and storage;
‡ obraz dótｸte a ™eny a v̅znam medializace problïmu (v televiznóm a rozhlasovïm vysólènó, tisku a jin̅ch mïdióch) pﾖi ochranｸ a prevenci › pokus mobilizovat a informovat tisk v Ev-ropｸ v souvislosti s þirok̅m pokrytóm tｸchto tïmat, kterï vþak vykazuje neÿplnï pochope-nó problïmu;
‡ the image of the child and of women and the role of advertising, broadcast and print media and other mass media in protection and prevention ̌ an attempt to mobilise and inform press players in Europe in the wake of continued broad coverage of such issues demonstrating incomplete understanding;
Projekty nèslednｸ pﾖijatï pro «nancovènótytobodyskuteｲnｸre‹ektovaly,aｲkolijevevｸtþinｸpﾖópadヮ pﾖesnｸ nereprodukovaly.
In the event, the projects subsequently accepted for funding did indeed re‹ectthesesugges-tions, even if they did not in most cases exactly reproduce them.
Mnohem vｸtþó poｲet projektヮ se v druhïm roce iniciativy DAPHNE zamｸﾖil na v̅zkum ｲi studie jako™to zèkladnu pro nèslednï zahèjenó ｲinnostó nebo pou™óvènó nèstrojヮ k jejich realizaci.
Many more projects in the second year of the Daphne initiative aimed to undertake research or studies as a basis for then developing actions or tools for action.
Mnohï z projektヮ se zamｸﾖily na vyplnｸnó zjiþtｸn̅ch me-zer umórnｸn̅m zpヮsobem; nejprve þlo o pilotnómi ｲinnosti t̅kajócó se speci«ck̅chohro™en̅chskupin, napﾖóklad ™en na venkovｸ nebo mlède™e vyrヮstajócó v ÿstavech. Tómto zpヮsobem ini-ciativa DAPHNE zaｲala budovat zèklady mnohem stabilnｸjþóch a u™iteｲnｸjþóch poznatkヮ a praktick̅ch zkuþenostó.
Many of the projects aimed to «lltheidenti«edgapsin a modest way by «rstpilotingactionswithindistinctvulnerablegroupssuchasruralwom-en, or young people living in institutions.
Snahy pouｲit se z poｲèteｲnóch zkuþenostó iniciativy DAPHNE a zabudovat je do vylepþenïho programu, u nｸj™ by bylo pravdｸpodobnｸjþó, ™e bude mót reèln̅ dopad, zlepþit znalostnó zè-kladnu v Evropｸ a vytvoﾖit hodnotu pro Evropskou komisi, byly v roce 1998 podpoﾖeny vydè-vènóm bulletinu nazvanïho DAPHNE News.
E . o r t s t o l e a r n l e s s o n s f r o m i n i t i a l e x p e r i e n c e s o f t h e D a p h n e i n i t i a t i v e , a n d t o bu i l d t h e s e i n t o an improved programme that would be more likely to have real impact, grow the knowl-edge base in Europe and produce value for the European Commission, were supported by the creation in 1998 of a simple newsletter called Daphne News.