natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Souｲinnost s dalþómi projekty a/nebo iniciativami: 7 %
Timeliness of dissemination activities: 7 %
Nejmïnｸ uvèdｸno
Less mentioned
Potvr-zuje to dヮle™itost kladenè na ÿroveﾏ odborn̅ch znalostó partnerヮ takï v rèmci omezujócóch faktorヮ.
This is con«rmedbytheimportancegiventothelevelofexpertiseofthesepartnersalsoin the limiting factors.
Proto se tento bod zdè b̅t rozhodujócóm a Komise se na nｸj bude ve sv̅ch nèvodech pravidelnｸ odvolèvat: dobrï partnerstvó s vhodn̅m odborn̅m partnerem podporuje ÿspｸþ-nost projektu, ale þpatnｸ navr™enï partnerstvó mu þkodó.
Therefore this point seems crucial and will be regularly recalled by the Commission in its guidelines: good partnership with appropriate expertise favours the project's achievements but an ill-designed partnership penalises it.
Kromｸ toho 10 % citacó v omezujócóch faktorech zcela logicky znamenè, ™e zdroje vyｲlenｸnï na projekt jsou dヮle™itï.
In addition, 10 % of the quotations for limiting factors mention quite logically that the resources allocated to the project are important.
(N = 137 projektヮ, a™ tﾖi dopady na projekt)
(N = 137 projects, up to three impacts per project)
Vyþþó odbornost
Increased expertise
Zmｸna chovènó t̅kajócóho se ochrany proti nèsiló
Changed behaviour regarding protection from violence
Vｸtþó otevﾖenost vヮｲi postupヮm z jin̅ch zemó/organizacó
More openness to practices from other countries/organisations
‡ se vóce zajómajó o spoleｲnou prèci;
‡ are more interested in working together;
‡ jsou schopnｸjþó pracovat spoleｲnｸ;
‡ are more able to work together;
Dopadem ¶vyþþó odbornostƒ se mysló lepþó chèpènó nebo novï pochopenó otèzky nèsiló, v̅mｸ-na zkuþenostó a postupヮ s partnery a dalþómi cólov̅mi skupinami, co™ vede k integrovanｸjþómu pﾖóstupu k otèzce nèsiló a lepþóm znalostem aktivit v danïm sektoru v celï Evropｸ.
The impact `increased expertise' refers to a better understanding or a new understanding of the issue of violence, exchange of experience and practices with partners and other target groups leading to a more integrated approach on the issue of violence and to an increased knowledge of activities in the sector across Europe.
‡ cólovï skupiny zmｸnily zpヮsob svï prèce, proto™e problïm lïpe znajó a v dヮsledku toho jej mohou lïpe uchopit. Energie je vóce zamｸﾖena na prevenci. Namósto hlèþenó pou™óvajó pﾖed-chèzenó, poradenstvó nebo pou™óvajó socièlnó okruhy.
‡ target groups have changed their way of working because they know the problem better and are consequently more able to address it.
Typicky je to pﾖópad projektヮ s v̅-zkumn̅mi prvky, kterï umo™ﾏujó hlubþó pochopenó prevence.
This is typi-cally the case of projects with a research component that has allowed a deeper understand-ing of prevention.
(N = 133 projektヮ uvèdó a™ 3 pﾖispóvajócó nebo omezujócó faktory dopadu)
Factors of impact on target groups(N = 133 projects having mentioned up to three contributing or limiting factors of impact)
Finanｲnó prostﾖedky/prostﾖedky pﾖidｸlenï projektu: 13 % àroveﾏ odborn̅ch znalostó partnerヮ projektu a jejich komplementarita: 50 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 50 %
Politick̅ zèjem/zviditelnｸnó: 3 %
Political interest/visibility: 3 %
Finanｲnó prostﾖedky/prostﾖedky pﾖidｸlenï projektu: 25 % àroveﾏ odborn̅ch znalostó partnerヮ projektu a jejich komplementarita: 1 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 25 %
Souｲinnost s dalþómi projekty a/nebo iniciativami: 4 %
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 4 %
Souｲinnost s dalþómi projekty a/nebo iniciativami: 1 %
Synergies with other projects and/or initiatives: 1 %
Jinï (novè velmi zajómavè tïmata): 1 %
Other (new topic of great interest): 1 %
Opｸt je zde dヮle™it̅ faktor, kter̅ mヮ™e projektu jak prospóvat, tak þkodit: je to stupeﾏ zapo-jenó pﾖedstavitelヮ cólov̅ch skupin.
Here again, there is an important factor that can both favour or penalise the project: this is the degree of involvement of representatives of the target groups.
Zde je to sprèvnï mósto pro dalþó radu projektヮm do bu-doucna: cólovï skupiny by mｸly b̅t adekvètnｸ zapojeny ji™ ve fèzi nèvrhu, zavèdｸnó nebo þó-ﾖenó projektu. Dalþóm dヮle™it̅m faktorem, kter̅ pﾖispóvè k dobrïmu dopadu projektu, ¶je kvalita v̅stupuƒ.
There is room for another piece of advice to future projects: an adequate involvement of the target groups, be it during design, implementation or dissemination phases. `Quality of the output' is another important factor contributing to a good impact.
Dopady na koncovï pﾖójemce
Impacts on end-bene«ciaries
Ptyﾖi projekty z pｸti (79 %) mｸly dopad na koncovï pﾖójemce v̅hod. Nèsledujócó graf ukazuje ｲetnosti zpヮsobヮ, kterï ovlivﾏujó tyto pﾖójemce.
Four projects out of «ve(79%)haveimpactsonend-bene«ciaries.Thefollowinggraphillus-trates the frequencies of the ways these bene«ciariesarea.ected.
(N = 117 projektヮ, a™ tﾖi dopady na projekt)
(N = 117 projects, up to three impacts per project)
Lepþó pﾖóstup k pomoci
Improving their skills
Zlepþenó vlastnóch schopnostó
Promoting their inclusion in society
¶Zv̅þenï uvｸdomｸnó siƒ je v̅sledkem aktivit þóﾖenó, kontaktu se zèstupci cólov̅ch skupin a/nebo pﾖómï zapojenó do partnerstvó.
`Increased awareness' is the result of dissemination activities, contacts with representatives of target groups and/or direct involvement in partnerships.
U nｸkter̅ch projektヮ koncovó pﾖójemci pﾖed projektem dokonce ani neznali svè prèva a existujócó slu™by, jak je dèle uvedeno:
In some projects, end-bene«ciar-ies did not even know before the project about their rights and existing services, as illustrated below.
Informaｲnó kampaﾏ znaｲnｸ ovlivnila veﾖejnï mónｸnó. Mnozó poprvï zóskali informace o problï-mu nèsiló na dｸtem.
The information campaign broadly touched public opinion.
Znaｲnｸ se rozþóﾖila znalost SOS linky pomoci.
There has been a broad dissemination of the SOS helpline.
V pilotnó fèzi bylo v 5 oblastech v Soluni odhaleno 6 pﾖópadヮ zneu™itó.
In the pilot phase, there were six cases of abuse revealed in « v e a r e a s o f T h e s - s a l o n i k i .
Dopad ¶lepþó pﾖóstup k pomociƒ zahrnuje pﾖópady, v nich™ se koncovó pﾖójemci lïpe spojujó se ｲleny cólovï skupiny (souvisó i s faktem, ™e cólovï skupiny jsou lïpe pﾖóstupnï a schopnｸjþó identi«kovatpﾖópadynèsiló)nebomohoulïpepﾖijómatpomoc(lïpevｸdó,kohovolat).Tytodopady jsou ｲastｸjþó v projektech koordinovan̅ch nevlèdnómi organizacemi oproti projektヮm koordinovan̅ch jin̅mi typy organizacó: 67 % ve srovnènó s 39 %.
The impact `Improved access to assistance' covers cases in which end-bene«ciariesreachmembers of the target groups better (also linked to the fact that target groups are more ac-cessible and more able to identify cases of violence) or are more able to access assistance (they know better who to call). Such an impact is more frequent in projects coordinated by an NGO than in projects coordinated by any other type of organisation: 67 % compared with 39 % respectively.
Pﾖi smｸrovènó pﾖójemcヮ k nèle™itï pomoci a pﾖi propojovènó poskytovatelヮ tïto pomoci a koncov̅ch pﾖójemcヮ hrajó nevlèdnó organizace opravdu dヮle™itou roli.
In fact, NGOs play an important role in guiding end-bene«ciariestowardsade-quate assistance services and in interfacing with providers of services and end-bene«ciar-ies.
Dopad ¶lepþó mo™nosti ﾖeþenó vlastnó situaceƒ se t̅kè pﾖópadヮ, kdy mè potencièlnó obｸﾝ lepþó postavenó k tomu, aby se mohla zab̅vat/ﾖeþit svou situaci.
The impact `Improved means of tackling their situations' refers to the case when a potential victim is better positioned to address his/her own situation.
Toto lepþó postavenó vznikè dóky:
Such better position is due to:
‡ lepþóm znalostem: chèpou svou situaci a znajó dalþó lidi, kteﾖó jsou ve stejnï situaci;
‡ better knowledge: they understand their situation and know other people who are in the same situation;
‡ zv̅þenï odvaze: majó odvahu zab̅vat se sv̅m problïmem.
‡ increased con«dence:theyhavethecon«dencetoaddresstheirproblem.
Dèle uvèdóme nｸkterï ilustraｲnó pﾖóklady:
Some illustrative cases are given below.
Na webovï strènky jsme umóstili specièlnó vyhledèvaｲ, abychom podpoﾖili tichï zóskèvènó informa-có, ani™ by lidï museli s k̅mkoliv mluvit.
We put a special search tool on the website to encourage people to get information on a low-key basis, without having to talk to anyone.
Existuje spoleｲn̅ pﾖóstup k lidem, kteﾖó trpｸli zneu™óvènóm.
A s i g n i « c a n t r e po r t e d i m p a c t b y n e t w o r k e d N G O s i s t h a t b e n e « c i a r i e s k nffo w m o r e o f t e n t h a nbef o r e this project who to call for help, the directory providing useful contact points across Europe.
Stejnï slu™by jim nynó poskytuje nè-rodnó veﾖejnï zdravotnictvó i policie a vþichni rozumó tomu, co dｸlè ten druh̅.
There's a joined-up approach to people who have su.eredfromabuse.Theynowgetthesameservice from the national health service and police and each understands what the other is doing.
Zv̅þil se poｲet slu™eb v regionu a jsou tu integrovanï slu™by pro rodiny.
There is an increase of services in the region and these are integrated services to families.
Zaｲalo to v roce 2000 jednou centrèlou a nynó jich je nｸkolik.
This began in 2000 with one headquarters and now there are several.
Byla zalo™ena nèrodnó organizace: Zlomenè duha (Broken Rainbow), kde jsou k dispozici pora-denskï slu™by pro lesbiｲky.
A national organisation has been founded: the Broken Rainbow, where counselling services are available for lesbians.
Dopad na koncovï pﾖójemce je mnohem vóce nepﾖóm̅ ne™ dopad na cólovï skupiny, proto™e se procesu mïnｸ ÿｲastnó.
The impact on end-bene«ciariesismoreindirectthantheimpactontargetgroups,becausethey are less involved in the process.
Koncovó pﾖójemci jsou pﾖójemci pïｲe a slu™eb partnerヮ a cólov̅ch skupin.
End-bene«ciariesarerecipientsofthecareandservicesof the partners and target groups.
Prospｸch jim pﾖinèþó lepþó pochopenó, kapacita, v̅konnost a spoluprèce.
They bene«tthroughtheirenhancedunderstanding,ca-pacity, performance and cooperation.
Póm vóce jsou zèstupci cólov̅ch skupin vヮdci, tóm vｸtþó je oｲekèvan̅ dopad.
The more the representatives of target groups are lead-ers, the larger the expected impact.
Nｸkterï projekty byly opravdu ÿspｸþnï, proto™e kontaktovaly vヮdｲó osobnosti spoleｲnosti (napﾖ. podólnóky FGM) nebo pﾖed-stavitele s rozhodovacó pravomocó (napﾖ. odborèﾖe), a zaznamenaly tak podstatn̅ dopad na koncovï pﾖójemce, jak je uvedeno nó™e:
In fact, some projects were successful in reaching com-munity leaders (e.g. FGM stakeholders) or decision-makers (e.g. trade unions) and registered substantial impact on end-bene«ciariesasillustratedbelow.
Na ｲlensk̅ch schヮzóch odborヮ CCOO ve Þpanｸlsku projekt vysvｸtlil, ™e sexuèlnó obtｸ™ovènó pﾖed-stavuje souｲèst jednènó a smluv odborヮ.
The project was explained in general meetings of the CCOO trade union in Spain so that sexual harassment has formed part of union negotiations and agreements.
Pracovnókヮm jsou nynó poskytovèny dobrï slu™by a zèstupci odborヮ dojednali smluvnó body, t̅kajócó se podpory prevence proti sexuèlnómu obtｸ-™ovènó.
Workers now get a good service and union representatives now have negotiated clauses to support prevention from sexual harassment.
Cólem bylo zmｸ-nit pﾖóstup policie a dosèhnout toho, aby nenèvist proti lesbick̅m ™enèm byla pova™ovèna za trestn̅ ｲin a za jev, kter̅m se mè policie zab̅vat.
The aim was to change the attitude of police and see hate crimes against lesbian women as a phenomenon they have to deal with.
V̅sledkem bylo proþkolenó policie ve Frank-furtu.
As a result, the Frankfurt police has been trained.
Finanｲnó prostﾖedky/prostﾖedky pﾖidｸlenï projektu: 10 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 10 %
Vｲasnost þóﾖenó: 5 % àroveﾏ odborn̅ch znalostó partnerヮ projektu a jejich komplementarita: 44 %
Level of expertise of the project partners and their complementarity: 44 %
Souｲinnost s dalþómi projekty a/nebo iniciativami: 2 %
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives: 2 %
Finanｲnó prostﾖedky/prostﾖedky pﾖidｸlenï projektu: 17 %
Resources/means allocated to the project: 17 %
Politick̅ zèjem/zviditelnｸnó: 14 %
Political interest/visibility: 14 %
Souｲinnost s dalþómi projekty a/nebo iniciativami (EU, nèrodnó, regionèlnó, móstnó): 6 %
Synergies with other projects and/or other initiatives (EU, national, regional, local): 6 %
Jinï (lobbovènó, vhodn̅ a osobnó metodologick̅ pﾖóstup): 2 %
Other (lobbying, appropriate and personalised methodological approach): 2 %
Hlavnómi faktory, kterï pﾖispóvajó k dosa™enó tｸchto dopadヮ, jsou kvalita v̅stupヮ (54 % pro-jektヮ s dopadem), odbornè ÿroveﾏ a komplementarita partnerヮ projektu (44 %), stupeﾏ za-pojenó u™ivatelヮ/pﾖójemcヮ (39 %), adekvètnost cólヮ projektu danïmu kontextu (35 %) a stupeﾏ zapojenó pﾖedstavitelヮ cólov̅ch skupin (33 %).
The main factors contributing to these impacts are the quality of the outputs (54 % of the projects with impact), the level of expertise and complementarities of the project partners (44 %), the degree of involvement of users/bene«ciaries(39%),theadequacyoftheprojectobjectives to the context (35 %) and the degree of involvement of representatives of target groups (33 %).
Tｸsnï zapojenó cólov̅ch skupin a konco-v̅ch pﾖójemcヮ do celïho projektu pﾖispóvè k vytvoﾖenó opravdu dヮvｸryhodn̅ch a platn̅ch v̅stupヮ þit̅ch na móru jejich potﾖebèm, co™ dèle pﾖispóvè þirokïmu pﾖijetó/pﾖijatelnosti tｸchto v̅stupヮ.
In fact, the close involvement of target groups and end-bene«ciariesthroughouttheprojectcontributestothe production of credible and valid outputs tailored to their needs and it favours the wide reception/acceptability of these outputs.
Jejich ÿｲast mè hodnotu i v tom, ™e zvyþuje jejich uvｸdomｸlost a ™e se obracó na jejich odvahu zóskèvat stoupence mezi þirokou veﾖejnostó.
Such participation is also valuable in raising their awareness and in turn encouraging them to reach broader audiences.
Spoleｲnè ÿｲast cólov̅ch skupin a koncov̅ch pﾖójemcヮ je dヮle™itè takï proto, ™e podporuje vzèjemnou v̅mｸnu nèzorヮ a porozumｸnó.
The joint participation of target groups and end-bene«ciariesisalsoimportantinordertofavour exchanges and understanding between them.
Pokud jde o dopady na cólovï skupiny, hlavnómi omezujócómi faktory dopadヮ jsou omezenï mno™stvó «nanｲnóchprostﾖedkヮ/prostﾖedkヮpﾖidｸlen̅chprojektヮm(10%projektヮsdopady)a þpatnï naｲasovènó aktivit þóﾖenó v̅sledkヮ (5 % projektヮ).
As for the impacts on target groups, the main limiting factors of impact are the limited level of resources/means allocated to the projects (10 % of projects with impacts) and the non-timeliness of dissemination activities (5 % of projects).
Nejprve je tﾖeba uvïst, ™e hlavnóm cólem programu DAPHNE nenó navrhovat legislativnó opat-ﾖenó nebo mｸnit politiku.
It should be « r s t nffo t e d t h a t t h e p r i m a r y a i m o f D a p h n e i s nffo t t op r o po s e l e g i s l a t i v e mffe a s u r e s o r to change policies.
Pﾖesto vþak k urｲit̅m legislativnóm a politick̅m zmｸnèm doþlo, a to jako vedlejþó efekt dóky silnï anga™ovanosti a ÿsiló ze strany nｸkter̅ch organizacó. Mヮ™eme to pova™ovat za klad.
However, as a side-e.ectduetothestrongcommitmentanddedicationof some organisations, some legislative or policy changes occurred.
Tyto dopady jsou:
These impacts are:
(N = 122 projektヮ, a™ tﾖi dopady na projekt)
(N = 122 projects, up to three impacts per project)
Zviditelnｸnó/veﾖejnï diskuse o nèsiló
Visibility/debate of violence in the public arena
Vｸtþó otevﾖenost vヮｲi zkuþenostem z jin̅ch zemó/rèmcヮ
More openness to experiences from other countries/settings
Nejｲastｸji uvèdｸnï dopady se t̅kajó rヮzn̅ch kategorió institucó a tvoﾖó je ¶lepþó uvｸdomｸnó si problïmヮ nèsilóƒ, ¶zviditelnｸnó/veﾖejnï diskuse o nèsilóƒ a takï ¶vｸtþó otevﾖenost vヮｲi zkuþenos-tem z jin̅ch zemó/rèmcヮƒ.
The most frequent impacts concern di.erentcategoriesofinstitutionsandconsistof`in-creased awareness of issues of violence', `visibility/debate of violence in the public arena' as well as `more openness to experiences from other countries/settings'.
Tyto dopady vznikly hlavnｸ dóky rozþiﾖovènó materièlヮ do móstnóch/regionèlnóch/nèrodnóch ÿﾖadヮ, na ministerstva a/nebo mezi ｲleny parlamentu a takï mezi ÿｲastnóky konferencó, workshopヮ a/nebo seminèﾖヮ z tｸchto organizacó.
Those impacts are main-ly attributable to the distribution of materials to local/regional/national authorities, ministries and/or Members of Parliament as well as to the participation of such organisations in confer-ences, workshops and/or seminars.
Mヮ™eme to shrnout prohlèþenóm, ™e program DAPHNE pﾖispｸl k poznènó nｸkter̅ch problïmヮ nèsiló a k posunu diskuzó o boji proti nèsiló.
They can be summarised by saying that Daphne contrib-uted to the recognition of some issues of violence and to feeding discussions on how to «ghtagainst violence.
Nｸkteﾖó koordinètoﾖi projektヮ takï uvèdｸjó, ™e jim projekt DAPHNE pﾖinesl vｸtþó zviditelnｸnó a dヮvｸryhodnost pﾖi pﾖesvｸdｲovènó ÿﾖadヮ.
Several project coordinators also reported that their Daphne project gave them more visibility and credibility to convince authorities.
Konkrïtnｸjþómi dopady jsou ¶vznik veﾖejnｸ «nancovan̅chiniciativƒa¶zmｸnyzèkonヮ/smｸrnicƒ.Je zﾖejmï, ™e jsou mïnｸ ｲastï, proto™e je mnohem obtó™nｸjþó jich dosèhnout.
More tangible impacts are `emergence of publicly funded initiatives' and `legislative/regulatory changes'. They obviously are less frequent due to their higher degree of di/cultyinbeingachieved.
Takov̅m dopa-dem mヮ™e b̅t napﾖóklad vytvoﾖenó v̅boru k posouzenó situace a vytvoﾖenó strategió, dodateｲ-nï «nanｲnóprostﾖedkynebokonkrïtnóakcespuþtｸnèÿﾖady.Mnohemｲastｸjijepozorujemeu projektヮ koordinovan̅ch nevlèdnómi organizacemi (37 % projektヮ s tómto dopadem) ne™ u projektヮ koordinovan̅ch jin̅mi organizacemi (16 %).
These impacts can be, for example, the creation of a committee to assess the situation and develop strategies, additional funding or a speci«cactionlaunchedbytheauthorities.Theyare more frequently observed in projects coordinated by an NGO (37 % of the projects with this impact) than in projects coordinated by any other organisation (16 %).
Tóm vyvstèvè otèzka, proto™e ｲlovｸk by pﾖedpoklèdal, ™e projekty vedenï (móstnómi) ÿﾖady by byly mｸly mót lepþó mo™nosti spoje-nó a kontaktu s kompetentnómi (nèrodnómi) ÿﾖady.
This poses question be-cause one would have expected that projects led by (local) public authorities would have had greater facilities to approach and reach the competent (national) authority.
Nejilustrativnｸjþómi pﾖóklady ¶vzniku móstnóch, regionèlnóch, nèrodnóch veﾖejnｸ «nancovan̅chiniciativƒ jsou:
The most illustrative cases of `emergence of local, regional, national publicly funded initiatives' are:
‡ Rozvoj projektu Caritas proti nezèkonnïmu obchodovènó s drogami v Itèlii sponzorovanïho po dotaｲnó linii ES STOP II a jeho rozþóﾖenó do Þpanｸlska a Rumunska, zmｸny nèrodnó strategie Litvy t̅kajócó se pﾖekupnictvó drog a pﾖijetó dotacó OSN a dalþóch evropsk̅ch zemó litevskou nevlèdnó organizacó, aby mohla svou prèci proti nezèkonnïmu obchodovènó s drogami roz-þóﾖit.
‡ development of Caritas a n t i - t r a / c k i n g p r o j e c t i n I t a l y s po n s o r e d b y t h e E C S T OP I I f u n d i n g l i n e and its expansion in Spain and Romania, change of the Lithuanian national strategy on t r a / c k i n g , a n d r e c e p t i o nffo f U N a n d o t h e r E u r op e a n cffo u n t r y f u n d i n g b y a L a t v i a n N G O t offe x p a n d its work on tra/cking;
‡ Spuþtｸnó provozu nèrodnóch laboratoﾖó nèsiló proti ™enèm v Belgii a Irsku.
‡ launch of national laboratories of violence against women in Belgium and Ireland;
‡ Vytvoﾖenó nov̅ch informaｲnóch/poradensk̅ch slu™eb pro obｸti domècóho nèsiló na poli-cejnóch stanoviþtóch v Portugalsku.
‡ creation of a new information/counselling service for victims of family violence at a police setting in Portugal;
‡ Móstnó ÿﾖady (Equal Opportunity Commission › Komise pro rovnou pﾖóle™itost) sponzorovaly kampaﾏ proti nèsiló na ™enèch a nadèle spolupracujó.
‡ local authority (Equal Opportunity Commission) sponsorship of a campaign against violence on women; it is still collaborating;
‡ Jako v̅sledek irskïho vedenó projektu byl vyvinut program lïｲenó pro vþechny sexuèlnó de-likventy na internetu ve Spojenïm krèlovstvó.
‡ development of a treatment programme for all Internet sex o . e n d e r s i n t h e U K a s a r e s u l t o f a n Irish-led project;
‡ Vytvoﾖenó Soudnó peｲovatelskï komise (Forensic Nursing Committee) v Irsku pro ™eny-obｸti znèsilnｸnó.
‡ creation of a Forensic Nursing Committee in Ireland for women victims of rape;
‡ Belgick̅mi vlèmsk̅mi ÿﾖady, kterï «nancujónèsledn̅projekt,bylavytvoﾖenapracovnósku-pina zab̅vajócó se sexuèlnóm zneu™óvènóm.
‡ creation of a working group on sexual abuse by the Belgian Flemish authorities, which fund-ed a follow-up project;
‡ Regionèlnó vlèda v Linci (Ûst), kterè se o to dﾖóve nezajómala, jako reakci na nezèkonnï ob-chodovènó s drogami, poskytla dalþó «nanceaktivitèmprojektu.
‡ provision of further funding to project activities by the Regional Government of Linz (Ûst), previously uninterested in responses to tra/cking;
‡ Portugalskè vlèda v kvｸtnu 2000 ustavila nèrodnó linku pomoci pro obｸti domècóho nèsiló.
‡ establishment by the Portuguese government, in May 2000, of the national helpline for vic-tims of domestic violence;
‡ Mezi partnery Regionu Marche (I) byla vytvoﾖena regionèlnó koordinaｲnó tabulka o prostitu-ci a nezèkonnïm obchodovènó s drogami, s ÿｲastó regionèlnóch ÿﾖadヮ a 4 provinció.
‡ creation within the partner `Regione Marche' (Italy) of a regional coordination table on pros-titution and tra/ckingwiththeparticipationoftheregionalauthoritiesandthefourprov-inces.
Toto pヮsobenó pﾖedstavuje hlavnｸ naplnｸnó databèzó odborn̅mi znalostmi, daty a v̅sledky zóskan̅mi v rèmci projektヮ.
This promotion notably consists of feeding debates with the expertise, the data and the results obtained through the projects.
Ilustraｲnómi pﾖóklady jsou:
Illustrative cases are:
‡ Vliv na vytvoﾖenó novïho ochrannïho zèkona proti sexuèlnóm urè™kèm ve Velkï Britènii.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e c r e a t i o nffo f a n e w S e x O . e n c e B i l l i n t h e U K ;
‡ Defensores del Pueblo ve Þpanｸlsku zaｲali pﾖijómat myþlenku specièlnóch soudヮ pro dｸti, kte-rï by rozsudky vynèþely rychle.
‡ the Defensores del Pueblo in Spain have started to take on the idea of special courts for children with rapid judgments.
Rada Evropy vydala knihu o sexuèlnóm zneu™óvènó, v nó™ je tomuto projektu vｸnovèna jedna kapitola.
The Council of Europe published a book on sexual abuse with one chapter devoted to the project work;
‡ Zaｲlenｸnó ¶partnerstvó stejnïho pohlavóƒ do nｸmeckïho obｲanskïho zèkonóku na ochranu obｸtó domècóho nèsiló.
‡ inclusion of `same-sex partnerships' in the German civil law on protecting victims of domes-tic violence;
‡ V roce 2002 vliv na pﾖijetó novï ¶Veﾖejnï iniciativy 97/154/JAIƒ, aby do nó mohly b̅t zaｲlenｸny vþechny formy souｲasnïho otroctvó.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o n i n 2 0 0 2 o f t h e n e w Cffo m mstu n i tffy A c t i o n 9 7 / 15 4 / J A I i nffo r d e r t o i n c l u d e a l l the forms of contemporary slavery;
‡ Vliv na pﾖijetó novïho nｸmeckïho zèkona ¶Gewaltschutz Gesetzƒ o domècóm nèsiló, podle nｸho™ se ™eny mohou obrètit na soud a ™èdat, aby pachatelï opustili bydliþtｸ.
‡ i n ‹ u e n c e o n t h e a d op t i o nffo f t h e n e w G e r m a n l a w G e w a l t s c hffu t z Gesetz on domestic violence according to which women can go to courts and apply for the o.enderstoleavetheabode;
‡ Dènskè vlèda pﾖijala ukazatele nèsiló a zavedla nèrodnó akｲnó plèn o nèsiló na ™enèch.
‡ adoption by the Danish government of violence indicators and implementation in national action plans for violence against women;
‡ Vypracovènó a schvèlenó italskïho zèkonnïho ustanovenó (Italian Regulation Act) pro ｲlènek 18 Imigraｲnóho konsolidaｲnóho zèkona (Immigration Consolidation Act), kter̅ podporuje nèrodnó integrovan̅ systïm socièlnó pomoci a integraｲnó projekty a nèrodnó volnï linky po-moci obｸtem nezèkonnïho obchodovènó s drogami.
‡ elaboration and approval of the Italian Regulation Act for Article 18 of the Immigration Con-solidation Act which promoted a national integrated system of social assistance and integra-tion projects and a national free hotline for the victims of tra/cking;