natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zem_28pisné rozlo_21ení _21adatel_32 (potvrzující _21ádosti)
Geographical spread of the applicants (confirmatory applications)
Kultura Vzd_26lávání/mláde_21
Culture Education/Youth
Vn_26j_19í vztahy - SZBP Civilní ochrana
External Relations – CFSP Civilian Protection
Obranné a vojenské zále_21itosti
Defence and Military matters
Financování Unie (rozpo_24et, statut)
Financing of the Union (Budget, Statute)
Parlamentní otázky
Parliamentary Questions
R_31zné (více ne_21 p_26t oblastí)
Various (more than five areas)
D_32vody odep_30ení p_30ístupu (odpov_28di generálního sekretariátu Rady v po_25áte_25ní fázi)
Reasons for refusal of access (replies provided by the General Secretariat of the Council at the initial stage)
Ochrana ve_29ejného zájmu t_22kajícího se ve_29ejné bezpe_24nosti
Protection of public interest as regards public security
Ochrana ve_29ejného zájmu t_22kajícího se obrann_22ch a vojensk_22ch zále_21itostí
Protection of public interest as regards defence and military matters
Ochrana ve_29ejného zájmu t_22kajícího se mezinárodních vztah_31
Protection of public interest as regards international relations
Ochrana ve_29ejného zájmu t_22kajícího se finan_24ní, m_26nové nebo hospodá_29ské politiky Spole_24enství nebo _24lenského státu
Protection of public interest as regards the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Community or a Member State
Ochrana soukromí a integrity fyzické osoby (ochrana osobních údaj_31)
Protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual (protection of personal data)
Ochrana obchodních zájm_31 fyzické nebo právnické osoby, v_24etn_26 du_19evního vlastnictví
Protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person, including intellectual property
Ochrana soudního _29ízení a právního poradenství
Protection of court proceedings and legal advice
Ochrana ú_24elu inspekcí, _19et_29ení a audit_31
Protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits
Více d_31vod_31 najednou nebo jiné d_31vody
Several reasons together or other reasons
V p_29ípad_26 potvrzující _21ádosti38
For the confirmatory applications38
Vá_21en_22 pr_31m_26r (po_24áte_24ní + potvrzující _21ádosti)
Ponderated average (initial + confirmatory) Ombudsman2
327 ze 2 100, co_21 _24iní 15,6 % _21ádostí
148 of 2391, being 6,2% of the applications
148 ze 2 391, co_21 _24iní 6,2 % _21ádostí
327 of 2100, being 15,6% of the applications
134 ze 2 830, co_21 _24iní 4,7 % _21ádostí
414 of 2224, being 18,6% of the applications
192 ze 2 160, co_21 _24iní 8,8 % _21ádostí
134 of 2830, being 4,7% of the applications
414 ze 2 224, co_21 _24iní 18,6 % _21ádostí
192 of 2160, being 8,8% of the applications
Potvrzující _21ádosti2
Confirmatory applications2
Potvrzující _21ádosti a stí_21nosti p_29edkládané Evropskému ve_29ejnému ochránci práv p_29ezkoumává v Rad_26 pracovní skupina pro informace a V_22bor stál_22ch zástupc_31 (_24ást II).
Confirmatory applications and complaints to the European Ombudsman are examined by the Council’s Working Party on Information and by the Permanent Representatives Committee (Part 2).
Odpov_26di _21adatel_31m a Evropskému ve_29ejnému ochránci práv p_29ijímá Rada.
Replies to the applicants and to the European Ombudsman are adopted by the Council.
V_8ro_9ní zpráva Rady o p_10ístupu k dokument_11m – 2006
Council Annual report on access to documents - 2006
GENERÁLNÍ SEKRETARIÁT DGF
GENERAL SECRETARIAT DGF
Výroční zpráva Rady o přístupu k dokumentům - 2007
Council Annual report on access to documents- 2007 n u l l
Po s k y t u j e r o v n ě ž in f o r m a c e o ve ř e j n é m r e j s tříku do k u m e n t ů
It also gives information on the Council's public register of documents as well as statistics on public access to documents.
Z p r á v a d á l e v y z d vi h u j e zásadní po k r ok do s a že n ý během š es tého roku p r o v á d ě ní na řízení a p ř e z k o u m á v á s t í ž n o s ti p ř e d l o že n é e v r o p s k é m u ve ř e j n é m u o c h r á n c i pr á v , jako ž i roz h od n u t í vyd a n á soudy
In addition, the report highlights the key developments in the sixth year of implementation of the Regulation and reviews complaints submitted to the European Ombudsman as well as rulings given by the Community Courts in 2007 under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in cases concerning access to Council documents.
R ady a o d a l š ích o t á z k á c h t ý k a jí c í c h se t r a n s p a r e n t n o s ti lze na jít na in t e r n e to v é s t r á n c e h t t p :
Additional information (and previous reports) on access to Council documents and on other transparency issues can be found on the Internet website http://www.consilium.europa.eu, under "Documents".
OBSAH s t r a n a
CONTENTS
P r o f es ní a ze m ě p i sné r o z l o že ní ž a d a t e l ů
Occupations 0and geographical distribution of applicants
Počet p ř e z k o u m aných do k u m e n t ů a za m í t n u t ých ž á do s t í o p ř í s t u p
Number of documents examined and refusals of access
Z v l á š t ní v ý j i m k a t ý k a jí c í se prá v ní h o po r a d e n s t v í
Grounds for refusal Specific exception for legal advice
Í KROKY
LEGAL ACTION
1 na řízení
INTRODUCTION
V č á s ti II jsou v y h od n o c eny č í se l n é ú d a je t ý k a jí c í se ž á do s tí o p ř í s tup k do k u m e n t ů m v p ř í s l u š n é m období
Part II analyses the figures for applications for access during the reference period.
E v r o p s k é m u ve ř e j n é m u o c h r á n c i pr áv a p r á v ní m k rok ů m
A final section, Part VI, presents the report's conclusions.
S po l e č e n s t v í za j i s tit p ř í s tup k r e j s tříku do k u m e n t ů v e l e k t r o n i c k é f o r m ě
In the case of sensitive documents3, the author specifies the references which may be permitted to appear in the register4
99 , o b s a h u j e od k a zy na do k u m e n t y R a d y , jež jsou v něm a r c h i v o v á ny a u t o m a t i c k ý m s y s t é m e m
The register allows access to the full text of a large number of documents which, pursuant to Article 11 of Annex II to the Council's Rules of Procedure, must be made directly available to the public as soon as they have been circulated5
D o r e j s tříku jsou t u d í ž a u t o m a t i c k y za ř a z o v á n y ve š ke r é do k u m e n t y p ř e d l o že n é
These are documents in the following categories:
, do h o do v a c í výbor s c h v á lil spol e č n é znění n e bo by l tent o p r á v ní akt s k o n e č n o u p l a t n o s tí p ř i j a t,
• documents regarding a legislative act after a common position has been adopted, a joint text has been approved by the Conciliation Committee or a legislative act has been finally adopted;
• jak ý k o l i da l š í text p ř i j a t ý
• any other text adopted by the Council which is intended for publication in the Official Journal;
• do k u m e n t y , k t e r é byl y ú p l n ě z p ř í s t u p n ěny s o u k r o m é o s o b ě na je jí žádos t.
• documents which have been made available in full to a member of the public who made an application.
,7 % ze všech r e g i s t r o v a n ý c h ) byl o ve ř e j n ý c h , tj. p ř í s t u p n ých b u ď ve f o r m á tu u m o ž ň u j í c í m s t a že ní
As of 31 December 2007, the register listed 1 010 217 documents (all languages taken together), of which 724 338 (71,7 % of those registered) were public, i.e. either available in downloadable format (700 449 documents in PDF or HTML format) or on request (23 889 documents in other formats).
(od toho t o d a t a jsou všechny n o v é do k u m e n t y o z na č e n é jako č á s t e č n ě p ř í s t u p n é ve ř e j n o s ti k d i s po z i c i p ř í m o p r o s t ř e dni c t v í m r e j s tří k u )
"P/A" documents registered before 1 February 2004 (from when all new documents classified as partially accessible have been directly available to the public via the register) are not usually downloadable but may be made available on request.
, jež jsou v d r že ní
Practical adaptations
V z á j m u p r o v á d ě ní p ř e z k u m u ú ř e dní c i odd ě l e ní p r o t r a n s p a r e n t n o s t sys t e m a ticky k o n z u l t u j í půvo d c e do k u m e n t ů n e bo p ř í s l u š n é ú t v a r y .
The processing of applications for access to classified documents requires thorough investigation by the relevant departments of the General Secretariat of the Council.
, kt e r é je třeba p ř e z k o u m a t, byl g e n e r á l ní se k r e t a r i á t R ady s to se s r o s to u c í adm in i s t r a t iv ní z á t ě ž í vyr o v na t a do d r že t podm í n k y a l h ů ty s t a n o ve n é v na řízení č
In 2007 the Transparency Department examined a total of 811 classified documents including 9 classified as "CONFIDENTIEL UE" and 802 classified as "RESTREINT UE"8
2007 byl a p r ů m ě r n á doba z p r a co v á ní po č á t e čfiní ní ch ž á do s tí 13 p r a co v ní ch d n ů
In 2007 the average time for processing initial applications was 13 working days.
,7 % po č á t e čfiní ní ch ž á do s tí, a l e je n u c en t é to m o ž n o s ti vyu ž í v a t čas t ě ji u po t v r z u j í c ích ž á do s tí, kt e r é m u s e jí bý t p řed po s to u p e ní m
The Council Secretariat extended the time-limit in 19,7 % of initial applications but it is forced to use this option more frequently for confirmatory applications, which have to be examined by the Working Party on Information before being submitted to Coreper and the Council for adoption, each of these steps requiring some time.
4 u ve d e n é ho na řízení
This practice does not, however, prejudice the possible application of other exceptions provided for in Article 4 of the Regulation.
K r o m ě do k u m e n t ů z p ř í s t u p n ěných p r o s t ř e dni c t v í m r e j s tříku na z á k l a d ě ž á do s ti o p ř í s tup pod l e na řízení
In addition to the documents which are made accessible via the register following a request for access under Regulation 1049/2001, a considerable number of legislative documents are made public each year, pursuant to Article 11(6) of Annex II to the Council's Rules of Procedure9
G e n e r á l ní se k r e t a r i á t R ady z á r o ve ň p ř i p r a v u j e m ě s í čfiní ní s h r n u t í, kt e r é m i m o jiné u v á d í všechny l e g i s l a t iv ní akt y , k t e r é byl y R adou v p r ůběhu d a n é ho m ě s í c e p ř i j a t y .
Parallel to this, the General Secretariat of the Council prepares a monthly summary listing inter alia all legislative acts, which have been adopted by the Council during a given month.
, jako ž i o p r o p r o h l á š e ní ch o h l e d n ě l e g i s l a t iv ní c h
The summary also includes information on the results of votes, the voting rule applicable as well as statements concerning the legislative
, kt e r á byl a za h r n u t a do z á p i su z jedná ní
acts which have been entered into the minutes of the Council
R ady od po v ě d n é za p r od u k c i dokum e n t ů s c í l e m se z n á m it je s po s tupy a zásad a m i, kt e r é m a jí bý t dod r ž o v á n y , pokud jde o p ř í s tup ve ř e j n o s ti k do k u m e n t ů m
In 2007, the "Transparency, access to documents and information to the public" Unit of the General Secretariat of the Council (DG F) had a staff of 19, allocated as follows:
19 za m ě s t na n c ů r o z d ě lených t akt o :
Access to documents: Information to the public:
R ady ú p l n ě n e bo č á s t e č n ě za m í t n u t, m ů ž e ž a d a t e l poda t pot v r z u j í c í žádos t, v ní ž po ž á d á do t y č n ý o r g á n , aby s v ů j pos to j p ř e h od n o t il.
In the event of a total or partial refusal of access by the General Secretariat of the Council to a document, the applicant may submit a confirmatory application asking the institution to reconsider its position.
, m ů ž e ž a d a t e l poda t s t í ž n o s t Evr o p s k é m u ve ř e j n é m u o c h r á n c i pr á v n e bo za h á jit řízení u
In the event of a total or partial refusal of a confirmatory application, the applicant may lodge a complaint with the European Ombudsman and/or institute proceedings before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities.
(na z á k l a d ě po č á t e čfiní ní n e bo po t v r z u j í c í žádos t i ) č in i l 6
The number of documents disclosed in full or in part (following initial or confirmatory applications) totalled 6 138 in 2007.
2007 byl o
While 18,7 % of the confirmatory requests for access in 2007 were submitted by journalists, this category of applicants only accounted for 2,9 % of the requests at the initial stage.
H l a v ní m důvod e m je s k u t e č n o s t, že p r o tisk p ř e d s t a v u j í ve ř e j n é r e j s tříky do k u m e n t ů ve d e n é o r g á ny po u z e je d e n z v í c e m ožných z d r o j ů in f o r m a c í.
This is mainly due to the fact that the institutions' public document registers represent only one of several possible sources of information for the press.
V e l k á v ě t š i na n o vi n á ř ů se na v í c za jí m á p ř e d e v š í m o n e j n o v ě j š í zpr á v y .
Moreover, the vast majority of journalists are mainly interested in the latest news.
P r o t o n e ní p ř e k v a p u j í c í, že n e po č e t n é ž á do s ti novi n á ř ů o p ř í s tup s p a d a ly ze j m é na do o b l a s ti inve s t i g a t iv ní ž u r na l i s t i k y , a byl y tedy podobné ž á do s t e m z a k a d e m ických k r u h ů
It is therefore not surprising that the few applications for access from journalists came in the main from the field of investigative journalism and were thus similar to applications from academics.
B e l g i e lze v y s v ě tlit tím
Fields covered by applications
, jako ž i m n o ž s t v í s d r u že ní za s t u p u j í c ích různá h o s pod á ř s k á a p r ů m y s l o v á od v ě t v í na e v r o p s k é ú r o v n i
As regards the fields covered by the applications, the interest in justice and home affairs remained high (26,7 %)15.
Pokud jde o o b l a s ti, kt e r é jsou p ř e d m ě t e m ž á do s tí, pokr a č u j e v ý r a z n ý z á je m o o b l a s t spr a ve d l n o s ti
This was followed, in descending order, by applications for documents on external relations and the CFSP (18,1 %), the environment (8,2 %), agriculture and fisheries (6,8 %) and defence and military matters (6 %).
R a d y , jak m i l e byl y t y t o do k u m e n t y r o z es l á n y .
2006) and the ESDP (6 % in 2007 as against 2,4 % in 2006) increased remarkably
G e n e r á l ní se k r e t a r i á t v p ř í s l u š n é m období p r o š e třil 7
Number of documents examined and refusals of access
123 z p ř í s t u p n i l v po č á t e čfiní ní f á z i (odpov ě ď g e n e r á l ní ho se k r e t a r i á tu j m é n e m
During the reference period, the General Secretariat examined 7 809 documents, 6 123 of which were made available in the initial stage (reply supplied by the General Secretariat on behalf of the Council).
: oc h r a na ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u s o h l e d e m na ve ř e jnou b e z p e č n o s t tak byl a č a s to u p l a t n ě na ve s po j i to s ti s o c h r a n o u ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u , pokud jde o m e z in á r o dní v z tahy
With regard to the initial applications, the grounds for refusal most frequently invoked were the protection of the decisionmaking process, which accounted for nearly two fifths of all refusals (38 %), followed by the protection of the public interest as regards international relations (15,1 %), public security (13,3 %), and defence and military matters (2,3 %).
, za tím co o c h r a na r o z h o do v a c ího p r o c es u o r g á nu byl a p r a vi d e l n ě z m i ň o v á na s po l e č n ě s o c h r anou ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u , pokud jde o m e z in á r o dní v z t a h y , v č e t n ě jedná ní o o b c h od u , r o z š í ř e ní a t d
In 30,2 % of cases several grounds for refusal were invoked: thus protection of the public interest as regards public security was often given in conjunction with protection of the public interest as regards international relations (20,4 %), while the protection of the decisionmaking process of the institution was regularly mentioned together with the protection of the public interest as regards international relations, including negotiations on trade, enlargement, etc. (5,4 %).
Pokud jde o po t v r z u j í c í žádos ti, oc h r a na ve ř e jného z á j m u , pokud jde o m e z in á r o dní v z t a h y , byl a u p l a t n ě na jako důvod u
As for the confirmatory applications, protection of the public interest as regards international relations was invoked as grounds for 20 % of the refusals in 2007 (14 % in 2006), while the protection of the public interest as regards public security was invoked in 6,7 % of cases (37,2 % in 2006).
, jako je o c h r a na ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u , pokud jde o ve ř e j n o u b e z p e č n o s t, ve s po j i to s ti s o c h r a n o u ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u , pokud jde o m e z in á r o dní v z t a h y .
In 33,3 % of the cases, several different reasons for refusals were given, such as protection of the public interest as regards public security in conjunction with protection of the public interest as regards international relations.
, je však třeba z d ů r a z n i t dů l e ž i to s t té to v ý j i m ky p r o s p r á v n é f u n g o v á ní a e f e k t iv ní p r á c i
While this exception is not the Council's most frequently invoked grounds for refusal, its importance for the proper functioning and effectiveness of the institution's work should nevertheless be emphasised17.
P r o ti tom u to rozsudku p r o b í h á v současné době od v o l a c í řízen í (věc
This judgement is currently under appeal (Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P).
, p ři řádné m z o h l e d n ě ní j u d i k a t u r y Soudu p r v ní ho s t u p n ě t ý k a jí c í se na řízení č
In addition, the Commission pointed to a number of practical measures aimed at offering members of the public better access to the documents of the EU institutions.
E v r o p s kých o r g á n ů a v y z v a l a o b č a n y , jako ž i or g a n i za c e o b č a n s k é s po l e č n o s ti, hos pod á ř s k é s u b j e k t y , ve ř e j n é o r g á ny a jiné o r g a n i za c e se z á j m e m na e v r o p s kých z á l e ž i to s t e c h , aby r e a g o v a ly na různé m o ž n o s ti uve d e n é v ze l e n é k n i ze
For that purpose, the second part of the Green Paper contained a questionnaire, through which the Commission sought the views on the public on the regime for obtaining access to documents of the European institutions and invited citizens, including civil society organisations, economic operators, public authorities and other organisations with an interest in European affairs to react to the different options set out in the Green Paper.
, jenž k r o m ě jiné h o o b s a h o v a l ta to z j i š t ě ní
Commission staff working document published in January 200821, which inter alia contained the following findings:
, aby ve ř e j n é r e j s tříky a in t e r n e to v é s tránky o r g á n ů byl y lépe s l a d ě n é a s na d n ě ji p ř í s t u p n é
The vast majority of the respondents would prefer the public registers and web-sites of the institutions to be more harmonised and easier to access.
, m n o z í z do t á za n ý c h , ze j m é na n e v l á dní o r g a n i za c e a n o vi n á ři, soudi li, že by m ě l a b ý t p ř i k l á d á na v ě t š í vá h a z á j m u o z ve ř e j n ě ní
As regards the issue of striking the balance between the principle of transparency and the protection of personal data and/or between transparency and the protection of commercial and economic interests, many respondents, in particular NGO's and journalists, claimed that more weight should be given to the interest in disclosure.
N e v l á dní o r g a n i za c e za b ý v a jí c í se ž iv o t ní m p r o s t ř e dní m v y j á d řily na o p a k u r č i t é o b a vy z toho, že by tak o v ý m to s l a d ě ní m m o h l o do j ít ke s ní že ní s t a n d a rdu p r o t r a n s p a r e n t n o s t v o t á z k á ch ž iv o t ní ho p r o s t ř e d í
By contrast, environmental NGOs had some concern that such an alignment might lower the transparency standard for environmental matters, while the chemical and biotechnological industries considered that the Århus provisions should remain a "lex specialis" vis-à-vis the general rules on public access.
In t e r in s t i t u c i o n á l ní výbor p r o p ř í s tup k do k u m e n t ů m
Interinstitutional Committee on Access to Documents
24 po řád á ní ve ř e jných r o z p rav o n e j d ů l e ž i t ě j š ích o t á z k á ch o v l iv ň u j í c ích z á j m y U n i e a je jích o b č a n ů
24 and its citizens
N o v á o p a t ř e ní p r o t r a n s p a r e n t n o s t pa t r n ě n e m ě l a n e g a t iv ní do p a d na p r a co v ní s c h o p n o s t R ady p ř i jí m a t
While the new transparency measures did not appear to have had a negative impact on the Council's work ability to take decisions26, their implementation had, on the other hand, led to a marked increase in the
. října
Page 23
64 r o z p r a v o v ý z na m n ý c h o t á z k á c h t ý k a jí c í c h se z á j m ů
Rulings given under the rules on access to documents
PRÁVN
Page 26
S po l e č e n s t v í žádné r o z h od n u t í ve věcech t ý k a jí c ích se p ř í s t u p u k do k u m e n t ů m
Commission on this question pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 1049/2001
2004, jí m ž m u byl ode p řen p ř í s tup k do k u m e n t ů m
By way of illustration, in 2007 processing time for initial requests was on average 13 working days.
, pokud jde o m e z in á r od n í vz t a h y a f i na n č n í, m ě n o v o u nebo hospodářskou po l i t i k u
9.606 partially/wholly 1.928 8.984 partially/wholly 1.092 9.879 partially/wholly 1.254 6.281 partially/wholly 1.155 8.451 partially/wholly 945 5.178
TO s h l e d a l, že o b s ah z p r á v y je třeba po v a ž o v a t za c i t l iv ý v p l n é m r o z sahu a že se
Number of documents considered by the Council following confirmatory applications + number of documents released
, že b e z toho t o z á p i su by byl č l.
99 partially/wholly 53 46
. a toho to na ř í ze n í se v z t a h u jí na po z n á m k u
Rate of document released for the procedure as a whole 362003 2004 2005
0 4 je třeba p ř i po m e n o u t
Based on 7.775 documents considered.
, že se ž a d a t e l v t ě c h t o p ř í p a d e ch do m á h a l z r u š e ní r o z h od n u t í Soudu ze dne
Based on documents released wholly (left column) or wholly + partially (right column).
S m louvy o
Page 32
R a d y , jako ž i ža l o b u o n á h r adu škody p r o ti ob ě m a o r g á n ů m
Professional profile of the applicants (initial applications)
. „p r a v i d l o původce “
Other groups of interests
Po č e t po t v r z u jí c í c h ž á d o s tí (pot v r z u j í c í žádos ti m ohou b ý t podá n y v p ř í p a d ě
Public authorities (non-EU institutions, third-country representatives, etc.)
+ po č e t ve ř e j n ý c h do k u m e n t ů nebo do k u m e n t ů ke s t a že n í
Geographical spread of the applicants (initial applications)
U n i ve r z i t ní
Austria Poland
Profesní profil žadatelů (potvrzující žádosti)
Geographical spread of the applicants (confirmatory applications)
O dvě t v í
Research
H o s pod á ř s k á a m ěnová po l i t i k a
Economic and Monetary Policy
S p r a v e d l n o s t a v n i t ř n í věci
Justice and Home Affairs
O c h r a na ve ř e j n é ho z á j m u t ý k a jí c ího se f i na n čfiní ní
Protection of public interest as regards international relations
Důvody odepření přístupu (uvedené generálním sekretariátem Rady v odpověď na potvrzující žádosti)
Reasons for refusal of access (replies provided by the General Secretariat of the Council following confirmatory applications)
Ochrana veřejného zájmu týkajícího se veřejné bezpečnosti
Protection of public interest as regards public security
Ochrana veřejného zájmu týkajícího se obranných a vojenských záležitostí
Protection of public interest as regards defence and military matters
Ochrana veřejného zájmu týkajícího se mezinárodních vztahů
Protection of public interest as regards international relations
Ochrana veřejného zájmu týkajícího se finanční, měnové nebo hospodářské politiky Společenství nebo členského státu
Protection of public interest as regards the financial, monetary or economic policy of the Community or a Member State
Ochrana soukromí a integrity fyzické osoby (ochrana osobních údajů)
Protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual (protection of personal data)