natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
̌ nemót nèmitky proti tomu, aby se pﾖedmｸt normalizace obsa-™en̅ v jejich pracovnóm programu projednèval na evropskï ÿrovni v souladu s pravidly stanoven̅mi evropsk̅mi normalizaｲnómi or-gèny, a nevyvójt ™èdnou ｲinnost, kterè by mohla b̅t na ÿjmu roz-hodnutó v tomto smｸru,
standard being prepared in another Member State, without at-tending the working meetings in the Member State con-cerned.
̌ umo™ﾏujó ostatnóm orgènヮm uveden̅m v pﾖóloze II zapojit se pasivnｸ nebo aktivnｸ (vyslènóm pozorovatele) do pﾖedpoklèda-n̅ch ｲinnostó,
The possibility of intervention is evaluated by the national standardisation body, which chooses one or other type of in-volvement.
V tomto pododstavci se smｸrnice obracó na ｲlenskï stèty, aby vyvinuly veþkerï ÿsiló k zajiþtｸnó, ™e se jejich odpovódajócó nor-malizaｲnó orgèny nepokusó maﾖit prèci na technickï harmoni-zaci provèdｸnou evropsk̅mi normalizaｲnómi orgèny tóm, ™e zabrènó pﾖópravｸ nèvrhu normy, kterou zam̅þlejó pﾖipravit samy na nèrodnó ÿrovni, na evropskï ÿrovni.
A questionnaire, usually attached to the draft standard by the body which prepared it, calls for comments regarding the ob-jectives of Directive 98/34/EC (for example, `Do you think that such a draft may result in barriers to trade?' `Do you think that it should be used as a basis for European work?' `Would you like to be involved in the work of preparation on the standardisa-tion committee? etc.).
Smｸrnice po™aduje, aby vþechny ｲlenskï stèty zajistily, aby je-jich odpovódajócó orgèny udｸlovaly jinïmu nèrodnómu orgènu (AFNOR, DIN, BSI atd.) prèvo ÿｲastnit se prèce na pﾖópravｸ nor-my v odpovódajócóm technickïm v̅boru. Toto prèvo ÿｲasti je mo™nï vyu™ót pasivnｸ nebo aktivnｸ.
The Directive cannot formally require national bodies to accept the comments of other national bodies, but acceptance should, in principle, be guaranteed since all standardisation procedures stipulate that a standardisation body should endeavour to take these comments into account.
Smｸrnice je vyz̅vè, aby prostﾖednictvóm ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ prokèzaly odpovｸdnost a soli-daritu, kterï jsou pro spoleｲn̅ cól v jednotnïm trhu nezbytnï.
The draft is then returned to the issuing body, with comments from all the economic and social operators of the various Mem-ber States of the Community.
Mo™nost ÿｲasti vyhodnocuje nèrodnó normalizaｲnó orgèn, kte-r̅ si zvoló jeden nebo druh̅ typ ÿｲasti.
In this subparagraph, the Directive calls on the Member States to make every e.orttoensurethattheirrespectivestandardi-sation bodies do not attempt to impede the work of technical harmonisation being carried out by the European standardisa-tion bodies, by preventing a draft standard which they intend to prepare on a national level from ultimately being prepared at the European level.
Odstavec 2 stanovó, ™e se ｲlenskï stèty nemohou zﾖóci svï od-povｸdnosti tóm, ™e se schovajó za odpovｸdnost sv̅ch odpovó-dajócóch normalizaｲnóch orgènヮ, kterï pﾖijaly normu, je™ poru-þuje ustanovenó smｸrnice 98/34/ES.
Active involvement assumes that an observer will be sent (a manufacturer, an economic operator or a standards engineer).
Jestli™e nebyly schopny zabrènit pﾖijetó dokumentu se soukrom̅m pヮvodem a dobro-voln̅m u™itóm, kter̅ je v rozporu s prèvem Spoleｲenstvó, musó ｲlenskï stèty zabrènit u™itó takovïho dokumentu jako referenｲ-nóho dokumentu tóm, ™e jej odmótnou uznat nebo formèlnｸ pﾖi-jmout. Jin̅mi slovy, jestli™e nèrodnó orgèny jednajó nepﾖimｸﾖe-nｸ, nesmｸjó nèrodnó vlèdy takovou situaci vyu™ót.
If the manufacturer or economic operator is not available, and the decision is taken to send a standards engineer, the latter will need to know the position of industry in his country in or-der to have su/cientknowledgeofthemarketandtobeableto say whether or not the draft standard risks prejudicing the free movement of goods on the market concerned.
43) Nèvrh pﾖipravit evropskou normu podan̅ nèrodnóm normalizaｲnóm orgènem u CEN nebo CENELEC musó zóskat podporu minimèlnóho potﾖebnïho poｲtu zemó,
Directive 98/34/EC contains such a provision because the na-tional standardisation bodies are all members of CEN and CENELEC and could therefore use their votes, in accordance with purely national interests, to oppose a draft standard be-ing considered at a European level.
( aby mohl ÿstﾖednó sekretarièt CEN nebo CENELEC navrhnout k pﾖijetó Technick̅m v̅borem.
A proposal to prepare a European standard, made by a national standardisation body to CEN or CENELEC, has to receive the support of a minimum of countries for the Central Secretariat of CEN or CENELEC to propose its acceptance to the Technical Board.
Povinnost dodr™et obdobó pozastavenó pracó zヮstèvè v platnos-ti i po pﾖijetó evropskï normy. V̅sledkem toho je, ™e kdy™ nｸja-kï odvｸtvó po™aduje normy v oblasti pヮsobnosti vy™èdanï nor-my, nebudou se prèce provèdｸt na nèrodnó ÿrovni.
This standstill period is an expression of the solidarity which must be exercised with a minimum of discipline once the decision has been made to work together on a European level.
Prostﾖednictvóm tohoto ｲlènku proto smｸrnice dèvè k dispozici prostﾖedek k posólenó ｲinnosti v evropskï normalizaci.
It is an integral part of the rules of procedure of the European standardisation bodies and is reinforced by Direc-tive 98/34/EC.
8 odst.
Article 7
Tato mo™nost je uvedena v prvnó odrè™ce ｲlènku 6 odst. 3 smｸrnice (viz dèle), kde se stanovó, ™e Komise mヮ™e po™èdat evropskï normalizaｲnó orgèny, aby pﾖipravily evropskou normu.
1 Member States shall take all appropriate measures to ensure that, during the preparation of a European standard referred to in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 6 ( 3 ) o r a ft e r i t s a p p r o v a l , t h e i r s t a n d a r d i s a t i o n bo d i e s do not take any action which could prejudice the harmoni-sation intended and, in particular, that they do not publish in the «eldinquestionaneworrevisednationalstandardwhichisnotcompletely in line with an existing European standard.
Proto v tomto pﾖópadｸ musó ｲlenskï stèty podniknout vþechny mo™nï kroky a akce, aby zajistily, ™e jejich normalizaｲnó orgèny nebudou na po™adovanïm pﾖedmｸtu pracovat, aﾝ s ohledem na pﾖópravu novï normy, nebo na doplnｸnó nebo zmｸnu existu-jócó normy, kterè nenó evropskou normou in extenso.
This Article stipulates that the Member States must ensure that their respective standardisation bodies observe a standstill period when the work in progress at European level relates to the prepa-ration of a European standard requested by the Commission.
̌ mヮ™e po™èdat normalizaｲnó orgèn svï zemｸ o pﾖópravu no-rem s ohledem na zavedenó technick̅ch pﾖedpisヮ;
This eventuality is mentioned in the « r s t i n d e n t o f A r t i c l e 6 ( 3 ) o ft h e D i r e c t i v e (see below), which provides that the Commission can re-quest the European bodies to prepare a European standard.
̌ stèt takï mヮ™e uｲinit zèvazn̅mi existujócó normy, a tóm je zmｸnit na technickï pﾖedpisy.
It refers to the State's ability, in certain circumstances, to enforce compliance with the technical speci«cationsforproductscontainedinthesestandards.
Je to nedｸlitelnè ｲèst procedurèlnóch pravidel evropsk̅ch normali-zaｲnóch orgènヮ, kterou smｸrnice 98/34/ES jeþtｸ dèle posiluje.
In this case, therefore, the Member States must do every-thing possible to ensure that their standardisation bodies
V takov̅ch pﾖópadech se u™óvè postup vztahujócó se na technic-kï pﾖedpisy popsan̅ v nèsledujócó kapitole.
In order to enforce the observance of standards which are es-sentially voluntary, the State may use two procedures:
Kapitola III › Postup vztahujócó se na technickï pﾖedpisy zik provedenou odpovódajócóm zpヮsobem v souladu s obecn̅mi zèsadami hodnocenó rizik chemick̅ch lètek uveden̅mi v ｲl. 10 odst.
Chapter III: The procedure applicable to technical regulations
Komise neprodlenｸ oznèmó ostatnóm ｲlensk̅m stètヮm nèvrh a vþechny dokumenty, kterï jó byly pﾖedèny. Komise rovnｸ™ mヮ™e tento nèvrh pﾖedlo™it v̅boru uvedenïmu v ｲlènku 5, a popﾖópadｸ v̅boru odpovｸdnïmu za danou oblast, aby se k nｸmu vyjèdﾖily.
The communication and distribution of information on draft technical regulations and the possible reactions open to the Commission and the Member States such information may be available, and communicate the antici-pated e.ectsofthemeasureonpublichealthandtheprotectionof the consumer and the environment, together with an analysis of the risk carried out as appropriate in accordance with the gen-eral principles for the risk evaluation of chemical substances as referred to in Article 10 (4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 in the case of an existing substance or in Article 3 (2) of Directive 67/548/EEC, in the case of a new substance.
1 odst. 9 druhïm pododstavci tﾖetó odrè™ce se podrobnï pﾖipomónky nebo stanoviska Komise nebo ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ mohou t̅kat pouze toho hlediska opatﾖenó, kterï mヮ™e brènit obchodu, nikoli jeho hlediska daﾏovïho nebo «nanｲnóho.
The Commission shall immediately notify the other Member States of the draft and all documents which have been forwarded to it; it may also refer this draft, for an opinion, to the Committee referred to in Article 5 and, where appropriate, to the committee responsi-ble for the «eldinquestion.
S v̅hradou ｲlènku 10, ｲlenskï stèty sdｸló neprodlenｸ Komisi ka™d̅ nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu s v̅jimkou pﾖópadu, kdy takov̅ pﾖedpis pouze pﾖejómè ÿplnï znｸnó mezinèrodnó nebo evropskï normy a kdy postaｲó informace o dotyｲnï normｸ; ｲlenskï stèty souｲasnｸ Komisi sdｸló dヮvody, pro kterï je nezbytnï takov̅ tech-nick̅ pﾖedpis pﾖijmout, pokud ji™ nebyly uvedeny v samotnïm nè-vrhu.
Subject to Article 10, Member States shall immediately commu-nicate to the Commission any draft technical regulation, except where it merely transposes the full text of an international or Euro-pean standard, in which case information regarding the relevant standard shall s u / c e ; t h e y s h a l l a l s o l e t t h e C o m m i s s i o n h a v e a statement of the grounds which make the enactment of such a technical regulation necessary, where these have not already been made clear in the draft.
Plenskï stèty neprodlenｸ sdｸló koneｲnï znｸnó technickïho pﾖed-pisu Komisi.
The Commission and the Member States may make comments to the Member State which has forwarded a draft technical regu-lation; that Member State shall take such comments into account as far as possible in the subsequent preparation of the technical regulation.
Je-li to vhodnï a nebylo-li tak ji™ uｲinｸno s pﾖedchozóm sdｸlenóm, oznèmó souｲasnｸ ｲlenskï stèty znｸnó zèkladnóch prèvnóch nebo sprèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ, kterï jsou zèsadnｸ a pﾖómo dotｲeny, pokud je znalost tｸchto znｸnó nezbytnè pro posouzenó ÿｲinkヮ navrhovanï-ho technickïho pﾖedpisu.
Member States shall communicate the draft again under the above conditions if they make changes to the draft that have the e.ectofsigni«cantlyalteringitsscope,shorteningthetimetableoriginally envisaged for implementation, adding speci«cationsorrequirements, or making the latter more restrictive.
Informace poskytnutï podle tohoto ｲlènku nejsou pova™ovèny za dヮvｸrnï, pokud o to oznamujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt v̅slovnｸ nepo™è-dè. Ka™dè takovè ™èdost musó b̅t odヮvodnｸna.
Information supplied under this Article shall not be con«dentialexcept at the express request of the notifying Member State.
Plenskï stèty musó v souladu s v̅þe uveden̅mi podmónkami zno-vu sdｸlit nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu, provedou-li v nｸm zmｸny, kterï zèsadnｸ zmｸnó oblast jeho pヮsobnosti, zkrètó pヮvodnｸ pﾖed-poklèdanou dobu jeho zavedenó, doplnó speci«kacenebopo™a-davky nebo zpﾖósnó po™adavky.
Where, in particular, the draft seeks to limit the marketing or use of a chemical substance, preparation or product on grounds of pub-lic health or of the protection of consumers or the environment, Member States shall also forward either a summary or the refer-ences of all relevant data relating to the substance, preparation or product concerned and to known and available substitutes, where
Byla-li pﾖijata nezbytnè ochrannè opatﾖenó, mohou si v̅bor uve-den̅ v ｲlènku 5 a nèrodnó sprèvnó orgèny v podobn̅ch pﾖópadech vy™èdat znaleck̅ posudek od fyzick̅ch nebo prèvnick̅ch osob ｲinn̅ch v soukromïm sektoru.
In cases of this kind, if necessary precautions are taken, the Com-mittee referred to in Article 5 and the national authorities may
zèkladnó prèvnó a sprèvnó pﾖedpisy nejsou souｲèstó oznèmenó, mヮ™e si je Komise vy™èdat pﾖi pﾖójmu nèvrhu.
seek expert advice from physical or legal persons in the private sector.
Neｲinnost Komise ve vｸci nèvrhu technickïho pﾖedpisu podle tïto smｸrnice nemè vliv na ™èdnï rozhodnutó, kterï by mohlo b̅t pﾖija-to podle jin̅ch prèvnóch pﾖedpisヮ Spoleｲenstvó.
The full text of the draft regulation must usually be sent. How-ever, when the draft involves the incorporation in full of an in-ternational or European standard into internal law, the Member State may make reference to the standard rather than commu-nicate the full text.
Tato povinnost jde ruku v ruce s povinnostó oznamovat dヮvody pro zavedenó navrhovan̅ch opatﾖenó (45).
If these basic legislative and regulatory provisions are not sent, the Commission can request them on receipt of the draft.
Povaha dan̅ch dヮvo- dヮ samozﾖejmｸ neumo™ﾏuje pﾖedjómat postup, kter̅ bude s ohledem na oznèmenó nèvrhu technickïho pﾖedpisu nèsledo-vat.
The absence of a reaction from the Commission under this Direc-tive to a draft technical regulation shall not prejudice any decision which might be taken under other Community acts.
Plènek 8 obsahuje seznam povinnostó ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ a Komise v postupu poskytovènó informacó v oblasti technick̅ch pﾖedpi-sヮ a mo™n̅ch reakcó na nｸ, kromｸ reakcó uveden̅ch v ｲlènku 9 smｸrnice vztahujócóch se na obdobó pozastavenó pracó, kterï je tﾖeba pﾖed pﾖijetóm oznèmen̅ch nèvrhヮ respektovat.
Article 8 lists the obligations of the Member States and the Commission respectively under the procedure for the provi-sion of information in the «eldoftechnicalregulations,andthepossible reactions open to them, apart from reactions relating to standstill periods to be respected before the adoption of the n o t i « e d d r a ft s , w h i c h a r e r e f e r r e d t o i n A r t i c l e 9 o ft h e D i r e c - t i v e .
Prvnó fèze: Oznamovacó povinnost a) Povinnosti ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ
First stage: the obligation to inform
V praxi ka™d̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt jmenuje centrèlnó jednotku, kterè je odpovｸdnè za odesólènó informacó Komisi a nèrodnóm minister-stvヮm (seznam tｸchto centrèl a jejich adres je uveden v pﾖóloze I tïto pﾖóruｲky). Oznèmenó Komisi mè formu zprèvy odpovódajó-cómu ÿtvaru Komise.
In practice, each Member State nominates a central unit which is to be responsible for sending information to the Commission and to the national ministries (a list of these central units and their addresses is given in Annex 1 to this booklet).
Obecnè pravidla
General rules
Tato ¶oznamovacó zprèvaƒ je uspoﾖèdèna do sedmnècti bodヮ, z nich™ ka™d̅ odpovódè speci«ckïinformaｲnópolo™ce.Napﾖ.vbodｸ 9 musó ｲlensk̅ stèt oznamujócó nèvrh vysvｸtlit v nejvóce deseti ﾖèdcóch dヮvod (raison d'ðtre) existence nèvrhu.
This `noti«cationmessage'iscodedinseventeenpoints,eachofwhich corresponds to a speci«citemofinformation.Inpoint9,for example, the Member State notifying the draft must ex-plain, in a maximum of ten lines, the raison d'ðtre of the draft legislation.
Po ukonｲenó schvalovacóho procesu na nèrodnó ÿrovni musó ｲlenskï stèty poslat Komisi koneｲnï znｸnó technickïho pﾖedpi-su (viz ｲlènek 8 odst. 3).
At the end of the national process of adopting regulatory pro-visions, the Member States must send the Commission the de-
Proto pokud ｲlensk̅ stèt pﾖijal nèvrh, ani™ by vzal v potaz po-drobnï stanovisko Komise nebo dalþóch ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ k nèvr-hu pﾖedpisu, mヮ™e Komise zahèjit ﾖózenó o poruþenó prèva podle ｲlènku 226 Smlouvy (46).
In order to guarantee the transparency of national initiatives, Article 8 requires the Member States to communicate immedi-ately to the Commission any draft technical regulation which they plan to adopt.
) Tento odkaz Komisi a ｲlensk̅m stètヮm, kterï si to pﾖejó, umo™ﾏuje zóskat bez obtó™ó text normy, kterè byla uｲinｸna zèvaznou.
This reference enables the Commission, and the Member States which wish to do so, to obtain without di/cultythetextofthestandardwhichhasbeenmadecompulsory.
(45) Zkoumènó uveden̅ch dヮvodヮ ukazuje, ™e se ve vｸtþinｸ pﾖópadヮ t̅kajó ochrany osob nebo zvóﾖat, ™ivotnóho prostﾖedó, veﾖejnï bezpeｲnosti nebo ochrany ÿdajヮ o spotﾖebitelóch.
An examination of the grounds presented shows that they most often relate to the protection of persons or animals, the environment, public safety, or to con-sumer information.
Plenskï stèty mohou podle ｲlènku 227 Smlouvy samy ce-lou zèle™itost pﾖedlo™it Komisi a zahèjit donucovacó akci pﾖed Soudnóm dvorem Evropsk̅ch spoleｲenstvó proti jinïmu ｲlenskï-mu stètu, o kterïm se domnóvajó, ™e nesplnil svï povinnosti (47).
F o l l o w i n g t h e o / c i a l c o m mstu n i c a t i o n t h a t i t i s v a l i d f o r s e v e r a l C o m mstu n i t y p r o - c e d u r e s , the national draft is thus examined on its own merits on the basis of each Community act to which it refers, and is the subject of a Commission opinion under each procedure.
Plenskï stèty jsou povinny uvïst vþechny postupy, podle kter̅ch je nèrodnó nèvrh oznamovèn, na zèkladｸ informacó uveden̅ch v textu legislativy Spoleｲenstvó t̅kajócó se oblasti, kterï se nèvrh dot̅kè.
If, therefore, the Member State has adopted a text without tak-ing account of the detailed opinions issued by the Commission or the other Member States on the draft regulation, the Com-mission can initiate the infringement procedure provided for in Article 226 of the Treaty.
V praxi byl pro odvｸtvó potravinèﾖstvó (48) s ohledem na snó™enó administrativnóch nèkladヮ ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ zﾖózen systïm ¶od-bavenó v jednom móstｸƒ (¶one-stop shopƒ).
The Member States are responsible for indicating all the proce-dures under which the national draft is noti«ed,onthebasisofthe information provided in the text of the Community legisla-tion governing the «eldcoveredbythedraft.
Podle smｸrni-ce 98/34/ES nejsou ｲlenskï stèty povinny znovu oznèmit nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu, kter̅ ji™ byl oznèmen podle jinïho pﾖed-pisu Spoleｲenstvó.
Under Directive 98/34/EC, Member States are not obliged to communicate again a draft technical regulation which has already been communi-cated under another Community act.
V takovïm pﾖópadｸ vþak musó uvïst, ™e do-tyｲnï oznèmenó takï plató pro ÿｲely smｸrnice 98/34/ES.
In this case, they must indi-cate that the communication in question also applies for the
Plenskï stèty vþak nejsou zbaveny svïho zèvazku splnit po™adavek, podle kterïho musó dostèt sv̅m po-vinnostem vypl̅vajócóm z ka™dïho prèvnóho pﾖedpisu Spole-ｲenstvó.
In practice, a `one-stop shop' has been established for the food sector, with a view to reducing Member States' administrative costs.
Jestli™e vþak pﾖedmｸt nèvrhu nepodlïhè v̅slovnｸ urｲitïmu postu-pu, potom Komise zkoumè tu ｲèst nèvrhu, kterè urｲitïmu postupu nepodlïhè a pro zbytek nèvrhu se pou™ije onen ur-ｲit̅ postup (5/).
If the State concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the matter before the Court of Justice.'
47) Plènek 227 (dﾖóve ｲlènek 170) stanovó, ™e ¶Plensk̅ stèt, kter̅ se domnóvè, ™e jin̅ ｲlensk̅ stèt nesplnil svou povinnost podle tïto Smlouvy, mヮ™e celou zèle™itost
Article 227 (former Article 170) provides that `A Member State which considers that another Member State has failed to fu l « l a n o b l i g a t i o n u n d e r t h i s T r e a t y m a y b r i n g t h e m a t t e r before the Court of Justice.
( pﾖedlo™it Soudnómu dvoru. Pﾖedtóm vþak ne™ ™alujócó ｲlensk̅ stèt pﾖedlo™ó svou ™alobu na poruþenó povinnostó podle tïto Smlouvy, pﾖedlo™ó svoji stó™nost Ko-misi.
Before a Member State brings an action against another Member State for an alleged infringement of an obligation under this Treaty, it shall bring the matter before the Commission.
Komise poskytne obｸma ｲlensk̅m stètヮm pﾖóle™itost pﾖedlo™it svï vlastnó nèzory a pﾖipomónky na pﾖópad druhï strany, jak ÿstnｸ, tak pósemnｸ, a potom vyslovó svヮj zdヮvodnｸn̅ nèzor.
The Commission shall deliver a reasoned opinion after each of the States concerned has been given the opportunity to submit its own case and its observations on the other party's case both orally and in writing.
Jestli™e Komise svヮj zdヮvodnｸn̅ nèzor nepﾖedlo™ó ve lhヮtｸ tﾖó mｸsócヮ ode dne, kdy jó byla zèle™itost pﾖedèna, nenó neexistence nèzoru Komise pﾖekè™kou pﾖedlo™enó ™aloby Soudnómu dvoru.ƒ
If the Commission has not delivered an opinion within three months of the date on which the matter was brought before it, the absence of such opinion shall not prevent the matter from being brought before the Court of Justice'.
48) Odvｸtvó s pﾖekr̅vajócómi se oznamovacómi postupy (v tïto souvislosti viz smｸrnici 2000/13/ES z 20. bﾖezna 2000 o pﾖibli™ovènó zèkonヮ ｲlensk̅ch stètヮ t̅kajó-
A sector with overlapping n o t i « c a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s ( s e e i n t h i s c o n n e c t i o n D i r e c t i v e 2 0 0 0/ 1 3 / E C o f 2 0 M a r c h 2 0 0 0 o n t h e a p p r offx i m a t i o n o ft h e l a w s o ft h e Mffe mb e r States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of f o o d s tffu . s , O J L 1 0 9 , 6 . 5 . 2 0 0 0 , p .
29; naﾖózenó Rady (ER) 315/93 z 8. ÿnora 1993 t̅kajócó se zavedenó postupヮ Spoleｲenstvó s ohledem na zneｲiþﾝujócó lètky v potravinèch, àﾖ. vｸst. L 37, 13.2.1993, str.
2 9 ; C o u n c i l R effg u l a t i o n ( E C ) 3 1 5 / 9 3 o f 8 F e b r u a r y 1 9 9 3 r e l a t - i n g to the establishment of Community procedures regarding contaminating substances in f o o d s tffu . s , O J L 3 7 , 1 3 . 2 . 1 9 9 3 , p .
1 smｸrnice Rady 93/43/EHS ze 14. ｲervna 1993 o hygienｸ potravin, àﾖ. vｸst. L 175, 19.7.1993, str. 1).
1 , a n d C o u n c i l D i r e c t i v e 9 3 / 4 3 / E E C o f 14 June 1993 on the hygiene of f o o d s tffu . s , O J L 1 7 5 , 1 9 . 7 . 1 9 9 3 , p . 1 ) .
( kヮ smｸrnice 2000/13/ES, plató postup uveden̅ v ｲlènku 19 tïto smｸrnice.
T h e l a t t e r d i r e c t i v e w i l l b e r e p e a l e d , a s f r o m 3 1 d e c e mb e r 2 0 0 5 , b y R effg u l a t i o n (EC) 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 april 2004 on the hygiene of foodstu.s,OJL139,30.4.2004,p.1.
Kromｸ toho s ohledem na ochranu ™ivotnóho prostﾖedó smｸrni-ce 94/62/ES t̅kajócó se obalヮ a obalovïho odpadu (50) v̅slovnｸ
draft technical regulations designed to limit the marketing or use of a substance, a preparation or a chemical product for rea-sons of public health, the protection of consumers or the envi-ronment (c.f. the fourth subparagraph of Article 8(1)).
23. bﾖezna 1993 (51) pro existujócó lètky a smｸrnicó Rady 67/548/EHS (52) (ve znｸnó pozdｸjþóch smｸrnic) pro novï lètky.
In accordance with this system, Member States always notify their drafts under Directive 98/34/EC, independently of the no-ti«cationprocedure(s)whichmaybelegallyapplicable.Mem-ber States shall clearly indicate, at the time of communication, the procedures in accordance with which they intend to sub-mit their drafts.
stanovó, ™e postup podle smｸrnice 98/34/ES plató pro vþechna navrhovanè opatﾖenó, kterè ｲlenskï stèty plènujó v tïto oblasti pﾖijmout.
In addition to the obligation to communicate the text of the draft and notify the grounds for its enactment, Member States must also supply additional documentation to the Commis-sion.
To je napﾖ. pﾖópad, kdy je tﾖeba nèvrh technickïho pﾖedpisu, kter̅ ji™ byl oznèmen dﾖóv, oznèmit znovu, proto™e byl podstatn̅m zpヮsobem zmｸ-nｸn a upraven (viz tﾖetó pododstavec ｲlènku 8 odst. 1).
Furthermore, with regard to protection of the environment, Di-rective 94/62/EC relating to packaging and packaging wasteexpressly stipulates that the procedure under Directive 98/34/EC applies to all draft measures which Member States plan to adopt in this area.
Jestli™e mè nicmïnｸ ｲlensk̅ stèt pochybnosti o tom, zda zmｸ-ny a ÿpravy v jeho nèvrhu technickïho pﾖedpisu od jeho prvnó-ho oznèmenó jsou podstatnï, mヮ™e se obrètit o radu na slu™by Komise, zda je tﾖeba nèvrh znovu oznèmit.
In this respect, the Directive speci«esthattheanalysismustbecarried out in accordance with the general principles laid down in two Community acts: Council Regulation 793/93/EEC of 23 March 1993,in the case of existing substances and Council Directive 67/548/EEC (as amended by subsequent directives), in the case of new substances.