natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V. Na základě zprávy Komise s názvem „Zlepšení vymáhání nároků Společenství vycházející z přímého a společného řízení (spravování) výdajů Společenství“ ze dne 3. prosince 2002 (KOM(2002) 671 v konečném znění), se Komise rozhodla ustanovit společný orgán OLAF – Zvláštní operační skupinu pro vymáhání dluhů Generálního ředitelství pro zemědělství, aby odstranila zátěž z minulosti, tedy veškeré případy podvodů vzniklé před rokem 1999 a dosud neuzavřené, a aby připravila rozhodnutí o tom, zda ponese finanční důsledky Společenství, nebo členský stát. 
V. Following the Communication of the Commission entitled ÔImproving the recovery of Community entitlements arising from direct and shared management of Community expenditureŐ of 3 December 2002 (COM(2002) 671 final), the Commission decided to set up a joint OLAF-Directorate-General for Agriculture Task Force Recovery in order to clear the burden of the past, i.e. all the irregularity cases prior to 1999 and still open in order to prepare a decision on whether the Community or the Member State bears the financial consequences.
Pokud se týče zjištění Účetního dvora o absenci adekvátních kritérií pro rozhodnutí, zda by se odepsané částky měly napočí-tat členským státům nebo zda by je mělo nést Společenství, Komise chce poznamenat, že během delšího období při využití svých dosud nabytých zkušeností vyvinula čtyři hlavní principy a řadu procedurálních kritérií zdokumentovaných v červenci 2002 (viz též odstavec 44). 
As regards the CourtŐs observation on the absence of adequate criteria for deciding whether sums written off should be charged to the Member States or borne by the Community, the Commission wishes to point out that it has developed, throughout time and on account of the acquired experience applied, four guiding principles and a number of procedural criteria documented in July 2002 (see also paragraph 44).
Od vytvoření Zvláštní operační skupiny pro vymáhání v roce 2003 sestavil servisní aparát Komise podrobný seznam kritérií, na jejichž základě mají být všechny případy auditovány, aby byly částky nevymožené zpět buď připsány na vrub Společenství nebo členského státu. 
Since the creation of the Task Force Recovery in 2003, the Commission services have drawn up a list of detailed criteria with which all the cases are audited in order to have the amounts not recovered charged either to the Community or the Member State.
Na základě vymezení odpovědností stanoveného v příloze 2 dokumentu Komise SEC(95) 249 ze dne 10. února 1995 měl UCLAF/OLAF obdržet všechny zprávy od členských států na základě nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 595/91 a odpovídat za analýzu a sledování vývoje příslušných případů, včetně zanesení příslušných dat do databáze pro podvody. 
Following the allocation of responsibilities stated in Annex 2 to Commission Document SEC(95) 249 dated 10 February 1995, UCLAF/OLAF was to receive all communications notified by Member States under Council Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 and was responsible for the analysis and follow-up of the cases in question, including input of the data concerned into the irregularity database.
Do odpovědnosti OLAFu v záležitostech vymáhání týkajícího se případů podvodu a zpronevěry spadá i vypracovávání souhrnných zpráv pro každý případ včetně snímku z uskutečněných řízení a zdůvodnění návrhů na možnou finanční korekci v rámci řízení pro likvidaci pohledávek (zúčtování) uskutečněného za odpovědnosti Generálního ředitelství pro zemědělství jakožto schvalovacího orgánu. 
OLAF responsibility in matters of recovery action related to cases of fraud and irregularity includes the production of summary notes for each case containing a rsum of the procedures performed and the reasoning behind the proposals for possible financial correction within the clearance-of-accounts procedure undertaken under the responsibility of the Directorate-General for Agriculture as Authorising Officer.
Proceduru pro likvidaci pohledávek (zúčtování) provádí Generální ředitelství pro zemědělství, ale v průběhu jeho různých kroků mu pomáhá OLAF. 
The clearance procedure is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, but throughout its different steps, this DG is assisted by OLAF.
Viz též dále bod IX. 
See also paragraph IX.
Komise vždy vyvozuje právní důsledky z dokazování zpronevěry a ze schopnosti stávajících předpisů CAP zajistit kontrolu, a přitom do Komise přijímá zejména následná doporučení tohoto Úřadu. Komise má zato, že vymezení odpovědnosti mezi OLAF a Generálním ředitelstvím pro zemědělství bylo jasně definováno: podle přílohy 2 zprávy Komise SEC(95) 249 ze dne 10. února 1995 je OLAF odpovědný v záležitostech vymáhání u nahlášených podvodů. 
The Commission always draws the legal consequences for the fraud proofing and control capability of the existing CAP regulations, taking on board in particular the follow-up recommendations of the Office. The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities.
C 269/20 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 4.11.2004 VII. 
C 269/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 VII.
1469/95 zavedlo v oblasti záruk EZOZF systém pro identifikaci ekonomických provozovatelů/operátorů, kteří představují vysoké riziko pro rozpočet Společenství, a sice prostřednictvím systému informování přes Komisi. 
Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 established, in the field of EAGGF Guarantee, a system for identifying economic operators who present a high risk for the Community Budget through a communication system via the Commission.
Po osmi letech od zavedení tohoto nařízení se zdá, že je počet zpráv poměrně omezený, ne-li dokonce slabý. 
After eight years of application of this Regulation, it appears that the number of communications is rather limited if not weak.
Komise věc obšírně prodiskutovala v rámci Skupiny pro podvody a vzájemnou pomoc zemědělské produkty a zaměřuje se na předložení Druhé zprávy Evropskému parlamentu a Radě s komplexním zhodnocením nařízení pro černou listinu a návrhem různých alternativních postupů. 
The Commission has extensively discussed the matter in the framework of the Irregularities and Mutual Assistance/Agriculture products group and is committed to presenting a second report to the European Parliament and to the Council containing comprehensive assessment of the blacklist Regulation and suggested options for action.
Existuje rozdíl mezi údaji obsaženými v tabulce 105 (pohledávka, která je jistá a nepodléhá žádným podmínkám, pohledávka na fixní částku vyjádřená přesně v hotovosti, pohledávka splatná a nepodléhající žádnému platebnímu termí-nudatu splatnosti) pro finanční postup EZOZF a částky ztělesněné v databázi ECR (objem částek čtvrtletně hlášených podvodů za jedno konkrétní období, který může být na daném stádiu pouhým odhadem podléhajícím následným zpřesněním). 
There is a difference between the amounts contained in Table 105 (receivable which is certain and not subject to any condition, receivable of fixed amount expressed precisely in cash terms, receivable due and not subject to any payment time) for the EAGGF financial exercise and the amounts embodied in the ECR database (amount of quarterly reported irregularities for one particular term, which can be at that stage mere estimates subject to subsequent refinements).
Komise požádala členské státy, aby provedly tentativní sladění databáze ECR s údaji z tabulky 105, a přitom měly na paměti, že si oba soubory dat nikdy nebudou zcela odpovídat. Až dosud bylo prvořadou prioritou zlepšení kvality dat. Data v databázi ECR nyní dosáhla takové úrovně spolehlivosti, která umožní jejich porovnání. 
The Commission has asked the Member States to undertake a tentative reconciliation of the ECR database with data of Table 105, bearing in mind that both sets of data will never coincide. Until now, the first priority was to improve the quality of the data. The data in the ECR database has now reached a level of reliability where it will be possible to compare the data.
Členské státy by se v nejbližší době měly přeorientovat na elektronický způsob oznamování podvodů. 
Member States should shift in the near future to the electronic format for reporting of irregularities.
Elektronický formát zvýší kvalitu dat, podpoří včasnost ohlašování podvodů a zabrání nedorozumění a nesprávným interpretacím. Komise v současnosti v tomto směru členským státům pomáhá a rovněž zvažuje zvýšení prahu ze 4 000 na 10 000 EUR, aby tak snížila tok dat a soustředila se jen na nejdůležitější případy. 
The electronic format will increase the data quality and the on time reporting of irregularities and will avoid misunderstandings and misinterpretations.
Komise je toho mínění, že vymezení odpovědností mezi OLAF a Generálním ředitelstvím pro zemědělství bylo jasně vymezeno: podle přílohy 2 zprávy Komise SEC(95) 249 ze dne 10. února 1995 je OLAF odpovědný za záležitosti vymáhání u nahlášených podvodů. Jakékoli rozhodnutí odepsat nedobytné pohledávky musí vyřizovat Komise prostřednictvím procedury na likvidaci pohledávek (zúčtování) EZOZF, kterou vykonává Generální ředitelství pro zemědělství, přičemž v průběhu jeho různých kroků mu OLAF pomáhá. A konečně pokud jde o navrhované zrušení černé listiny, ačkoli Komise s Účetním dvorem sdílí názor, že systém dobře nefunguje, je toho mínění, že existuje prostor pro jeho vylepšení a doporučuje spíše vylepšit uplatnění tohoto nástroje členskými státy, než jeho prosté zrušení. 
The Commission considers that the allocation of responsibilities between OLAF and the Directorate-General for Agriculture has been clearly defined: according to Annex 2 to the Communication of the Commission SEC(95) 249, OLAF is responsible in matters of recovery on reported irregularities. Any decision to write off irrecoverable amounts has to be taken by the Commission via the EAGGF clearance-of-accounts procedure that is conducted by the Directorate-General for Agriculture, in which OLAF assists throughout its different steps. Finally, regarding the suggested abolition of the black list, the Commission, while sharing the view of the Court that the system does not work well, thinks there is room for improvement of the scheme and would rather see the application of the tool by the Member States being improved, than simply abolished.
INTRODUCTION 4. 
INTRODUCTION 4.
During 2003, the Commission updated the figures for the cumulative total of irregular CAP payments. 
During 2003, the Commission updated the figures for the cumulative total of irregular CAP payments.
The updated figures are (see paragraph 30): — irregularities notified after payment: EUR 2 983 million; — amount recovered from claimants: EUR 603 million; — amount written off against EAGGF: EUR 153 million; — amount charged to Member States: EUR 144 million; — amount to be recovered: EUR 2 083 million. 
The updated figures are (see paragraph 30): Ń irregularities notified after payment: EUR 2 983 million; Ń amount recovered from claimants: EUR 603 million; Ń amount written off against EAGGF: EUR 153 million; Ń amount charged to Member States: EUR 144 million; Ń amount to be recovered: EUR 2 083 million.
ANALYSIS 9. 
ANALYSIS 9.
At the beginning of May 2004, the amount of irregular payments notified since 1971 stood at EUR 2 983 million while the amount to be recovered represented EUR 2 083 million. 
At the beginning of May 2004, the amount of irregular payments notified since 1971 stood at EUR 2 983 million while the amount to be recovered represented EUR 2 083 million.
The updated percentage refered to by the Court represented therefore 30 %. 
The updated percentage refered to by the Court represented therefore 30 %.
(The quality and reliability of the data has improved during the year 2003 due to the quality checks, audits of the Task Force Recovery and feedback from Member States). 
(The quality and reliability of the data has improved during the year 2003 due to the quality checks, audits of the Task Force Recovery and feedback from Member States).
This figure includes all updates of the year 2003 and the financial impact of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC. 
This figure includes all updates of the year 2003 and the financial impact of Commission Decision 2003/481/EC.
During 2003, the Commission updated its figures for debts prior to 1994. 
During 2003, the Commission updated its figures for debts prior to 1994.
The updated percentage is 22,4 % (see paragraph 30). 
The updated percentage is 22,4 % (see paragraph 30).
The latest CAP reforms have been conducted and adopted in particular with the aim of minimising the risks of fraud and other irregularities. 
The latest CAP reforms have been conducted and adopted in particular with the aim of minimising the risks of fraud and other irregularities.
The IACS (Integrated Administration and Control System), which is acknowledged by the Court as having a major impact on the prevention of irregular payments, is now covering, directly or indirectly, 80 % of CAP expenditure. 
The IACS (Integrated Administration and Control System), which is acknowledged by the Court as having a major impact on the prevention of irregular payments, is now covering, directly or indirectly, 80 % of CAP expenditure.
4.11.2004 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
4.11.2004 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 269/21 15.(b) Additional developments are to be found in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
The Commission shares the view that Member States interpret differently the notion of primary administrative or judicial findings of facts; however, it has defined, on various occasions, in different documents and interpretative notes what is to be meant by this notion while a definition is given in the context of the black list in Commission Regulation (EC) No 745/96, Article 1(2) (1). 
The Commission shares the view that Member States interpret differently the notion of primary administrative or judicial findings of facts; however, it has defined, on various occasions, in different documents and interpretative notes what is to be meant by this notion while a definition is given in the context of the black list in Commission Regulation (EC) No 745/96, Article 1(2) (1).
Germany and Spain together account for more than 50 % of the reported irregularities and these two Member States seldom report on time. 
Germany and Spain together account for more than 50 % of the reported irregularities and these two Member States seldom report on time.
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group ‘Irregularities and Mutual Assistance – Agricultural Products’ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2). 
The Commission has informed Member States by discussing this problem in meetings as Cocolaf and Working Group ÔIrregularities and Mutual Assistance Ń Agricultural ProductsŐ and by publishing the relevant figures in the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud (paragraph 10.2.2).
The Commission has made Member States aware of the fact that the time between the discovery and the reporting of an irregularity is too long. 
The Commission has made Member States aware of the fact that the time between the discovery and the reporting of an irregularity is too long.
In annual reports and presentations in meetings of Cocolaf, Member States have been informed that the reporting time could have an impact on the determination of the negligence of a Member State (see Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud, point 10.5). 
In annual reports and presentations in meetings of Coolaf, Member States have been informed that the reporting time could have an impact on the determination of the negligence of a Member State (see Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud, point 10.5).
Almost 90 % of irregularities are notified within two years of their discovery. 
Almost 90 % of irregularities are notified within two years of their discovery.
The Task Force Recovery (see paragraph V) in the course of its audit also found out that Italy has not yet notified the writing off of certain debts in spite of court orders establishing that there had not been any fraud committed. 
The Task Force Recovery (see paragraph V) in the course of its audit also found out that Italy has not yet notified the writing off of certain debts in spite of court orders establishing that there had not been any fraud committed.
The necessary corrections have been introduced in the ECR database after July 2003. 
The necessary corrections have been introduced in the ECR database after July 2003.
OLAF has informed Member States in several meetings that some cases still had a pending financial state, i.e. amounts were still to be calculated. 
OLAF has informed Member States in several meetings that some cases still had a pending financial state, i.e. amounts were still to be calculated.
Member States were asked to update these cases as soon as (new) information became available (see also point 28). 
Member States were asked to update these cases as soon as (new) information became available (see also point 28).
The Commission introduced an electronic reporting system in 2001. 
The Commission introduced an electronic reporting system in 2001.
At the same time specific fields relating to ‘Inte-rest’ and ‘Penalties’ were introduced. 
At the same time specific fields relating to ÔInterestŐ and ÔPenaltiesŐ were introduced.
For 2003, 30 % of the cases provide information concerning penalties and/or interest. 
For 2003, 30 % of the cases provide information concerning penalties and/or interest.
The Commission is aware of the problem of inconsisten-cies of definition and coverage in the information supplied and has already remarked on this problem (see Commission 2002 Report on the fight against fraud, paragraph 11.2). 
The Commission is aware of the problem of inconsistencies of definition and coverage in the information supplied and has already remarked on this problem (see Commission 2002 Report on the fight against fraud, paragraph 11.2).
In addition, OLAF also informed Member States in several meetings that the non-reporting of the CN code (product description) would hin-der the Commission in producing analyses. 
In addition, OLAF also informed Member States in several meetings that the non-reporting of the CN code (product description) would hinder the Commission in producing analyses.
The Commission has made substantial efforts to improve the quality of information supplied by Member States in the initial communication as well as in all updates on financial impact. 
The Commission has made substantial efforts to improve the quality of information supplied by Member States in the initial communication as well as in all updates on financial impact.
In the framework of the Task Force Recovery, a first attempt has been made to audit the completeness and reliability of the communications and its updates by the Member States. 
In the framework of the Task Force Recovery, a first attempt has been made to audit the completeness and reliability of the communications and its updates by the Member States.
Efforts have been made to tackle the problem of discrepancies between Member State data and the ECR. 
Efforts have been made to tackle the problem of discrepancies between Member State data and the ECR.
Reasons for discrepancies can be due to the lack of human resources in order to monitor on a regular basis the constant flow of data provided by Member States. 
Reasons for discrepancies can be due to the lack of human resources in order to monitor on a regular basis the constant flow of data provided by Member States.
The number of staff has meanwhile been increased. 
The number of staff has meanwhile been increased.
The module has been translated into all languages of EU and a manual has been written. 
The module has been translated into all languages of EU and a manual has been written.
The Commission asked Member States to verify the figures of draft Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
The Commission asked Member States to verify the figures of draft Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
Feedback of Member States was taken into account before the final version of the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud was released; therefore, the figures in this Report have the agreement of Member States. 
Feedback of Member States was taken into account before the final version of the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud was released; therefore, the figures in this Report have the agreement of Member States.
Cases and communications have been updated during the year 2003 on the basis of: — quality checks by OLAF, — findings of Member States concerning the data in the ECR database, — updates of old cases by Member States, — Commission Decision 2003/481/EC, — audit findings by the Task Force Recovery, — audit findings by the Court of Auditors. 
Cases and communications have been updated during the year 2003 on the basis of: Ń quality checks by OLAF, Ń findings of Member States concerning the data in the ECR database, Ń updates of old cases by Member States, Ń Commission Decision 2003/481/EC, Ń audit findings by the Task Force Recovery, Ń audit findings by the Court of Auditors.
Figures based on the data available in the ECR database on 2 May 2004 are in line with the figures as produced for the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud. 
Figures based on the data available in the ECR database on 2 May 2004 are in line with the figures as produced for the Commission Report 2002 on the fight against fraud.
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the ‘figures must be handled with great caution’ (p. 41) as ‘there is no certainty that the total number of communications received represents the total frauds and irregularities detected by Member States’ (p. 44). 
However, it was already mentioned in this Report that the Ôfigures must be handled with great cautionŐ (p.
C 269/22 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account. 
C 269/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 4.11.2004 The effects of the updates during 2003 and Commission Decision 2003/481/EC (EUR 75 million) have been taken into account.
The Commission recognises that there are deficiencies in the link between ECR and CMS (Case Management System). 
The Commission recognises that there are deficiencies in the link between ECR and CMS (Case Management System).
A request for a change in the ECR database was made in September 2003. 
A request for a change in the ECR database was made in September 2003.
An extra field will be added to the module to create a link between CMS and the ECR database, making it also possible to access the information on the financial recovery situation provided by the Member State. operation prudently thanks to specific, clear-cut criteria and transparent legal procedure in particular based on: — annual global communications by Member States regarding the stage of their national recovery procedures, — attentive scrutiny of the files examined by the Task Force Recovery, — approved criteria to determine whether the non-recovered amounts should be charged to the Community Budget or to the Member State. 
An extra field will be added to the module to create a link between CMS and the ECR database, making it also possible to access the information on the financial recovery situation provided by the Member State. operation prudently thanks to specific, clear-cut criteria and transparent legal procedure in particular based on: Ń annual global communications by Member States regarding the stage of their national recovery procedures, Ń attentive scrutiny of the files examined by the Task Force Recovery, Ń approved criteria to determine whether the non-recovered amounts should be charged to the Community Budget or to the Member State.