natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
18.3.2005 18.3.2005 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 67/19 PŘÍLOHA II DEFINICE POJMU „LES“ V JEDNOTLIVÝCH ČLENSKÝCH STÁTECH Definice lesa: hlavní kritéria a práh používaný jednotlivými zeměmi podle Evropského lesnického informačního a komunikačního systému (EFICS) země šířka Minimální korunový zápoj plocha potenciální produkce výška ve vzrostlém stavu Rakousko Belgie (Valonský region) Belgie (Vlámský region) Dánsko Finsko Francie Německo Řecko Irsko Itálie Lucembursko Portugalsko Španělsko Švédsko Nizozemsko Spojené království 10m 30% 9m 25m 20% 20m 15m 10 % nebo 500 kmenů/ha s c.b.h. < 24,5 cm 10m 30m 10% 40m 20% 20m 20% — — 15m 10% 20m 30% 30m 20% 50m 20% 0,05 ha 0,1 ha 0,5 ha 0,5 ha 0,25 ha 0,05 ha 0,1 ha 0,5 ha 0,5 ha 0,2 ha — 0,2 ha 0,25 ha 0,25 ha 0,5 ha 2 ha 6m 1 m3/ha/rok 4 m3/ha/rok (jehličnaté dřeviny) 2 m3/ha/rok (listnaté dřeviny) 1 m3/ha/rok Zdroje: ES 1997. 
18.3.2005 18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/19 ANNEX II FOREST DEFINITION IN THE MEMBER STATES Definition of forest: main criteria and threshold used by country according to the European Forestry Information and Communication System (EFICS) Country Width Minimum Crown cover Area Potential production Height in mature age Austria Belgium (Walloon region) Belgium (Flemish region) Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Luxembourg Portugal Spain Sweden Netherlands United Kingdom 10m 30% 9m 25m 20% 20m 15m 10 % or 500 stems/ha with cbh < 24,5 cm 10m 30m 10% 40m 20% 20m 20% none none 15m 10% 20m 30% 30m 20% 50m 20% 0,05 ha 0,1 ha 0,5 ha 0,5 ha 0,25 ha 0,05 ha 0,1 ha 0,5 ha 0,5 ha 0,2 ha none 0,2 ha 0,25 ha 0,25 ha 0,5 ha 2 ha 6m 1 m3/ha/year 4 m3/ha/year (conifer) 2 m3/ha/year (broadleaf) 1 m3/ha/year Sources: EC 1997 Ń Study on European Forestry Information and Communication System (EFICS).
Zprávy o inventárních systémech a systémech mapování. 
Reports on forestry inventory and survey systems.
Evropská komise, Lucemburk. 
European Commission, Luxembourg.
C 67/20 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 18.3.2005 SHRNUTÍ II. Komise vítá tuto zprávu, díky jejímuž včasnému předložení ji bude možno přiměřeně vzít v úvahu při nadcházejícím hodnocení lesní strategie a budoucího rámce rozvoje venkova (KOM 2004/490 v konečném znění). 
C 67/20 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 THE COMMISSIONŐS REPLIES SUMMARY II. The Commission welcomes this report whose timely presentation will allow appropriate consideration to be taken in the light of the forthcoming review of the EU forest strategy and the future rural development framework (COM(2004) 490 final).
U principu subsidiarity se Komise domnívá, že řada prováděcích rozhodnutí zůstává na uvážení jednotlivých členských států, jak je uváděno v různých částech odpovědi Komise na tuto zprávu. 
With regard to the principle of subsidiarity the Commission considers that a number of implementation decisions remain at the discretion of the Member States, as it is expressed in various parts of the CommissionŐs reply to this report.
V. Udržitelné hospodaření s lesy je založeno na vyvážené integraci hospodářských, sociálních a ekologických cílů a současném zvažování různých otázek, jichž se tato problematika týká. 
V. Sustainable forest management is based on the balanced integration of economic, social and environmental objectives weighing the various issues at stake.
Komise se domnívá, že kvalita sledování může být bez společné definice lesa zajištěna. 
The Commission considers that the quality of monitoring can be assured without a common definition of forest.
Výsledky této politiky mohou být sledovány na úrovni členských států a následně na úrovni EU. 
The outcome of the policy can be monitored at Member State level and subsequently at EU level.
Propojení mezi lesní strategií a jednotlivými projekty spolufinancovanými Evropským zemědělským orientačním a záručním fondem (EZOZF) je zajištěno prostřednictvím programů rozvoje venkova (PRV). 
The link between the forestry strategy and the individual projects co-financed by the EAGGF funds is ensured via the rural development programmes (RDPs).
Komise ověřuje, zda programy odpovídají lesní strategii. 
The Commission verifies that programmes are in line with the forestry strategy.
Vnitrostátní nebo regionální orgány jednotlivé projekty schvalují na základě PRV. 
The national or regional authorities approve the individual projects on basis of the RDP.
V návrhu budoucího rámce rozvoje venkova Komise navrhuje jasnější vymezení odpovědnosti mezi Komisí a členskými státy. 
In the proposal for the future rural development framework the Commission proposes a clearer demarcation of responsibilities between the Commission and the Member States.
Příspěvek k plnění strategie EU v lesnictví je pro každý program rozvoje venkova posuzován v hodnotících zprávách připravovaných členskými státy a shrnutých Komisí. 
The contribution to the achievement of the EU forestry strategy is assessed for each rural development programme in the evaluation reports prepared by the Member States and summarised by the Commission.
Komise v červenci 2004 (KOM 2004/490 v konečném znění) navrhla zpřísnit hodnotící požadavky pro budoucí rámec rozvoje venkova. 
The Commission proposed in July 2004 (COM(2004) 490 final) to reinforce the evaluation requirements for the future rural development framework.
Evropské země vyvinuly společný přístup ke vnitrostátním programům v oblasti lesního hospodářství v souvislosti s mi-nisterskou konferencí o ochraně lesů v Evropě (MKOLE) a v sestavování programů bylo dosaženo výrazného pokroku. 
European countries have developed a common approach to national forest programmes in the context of the Ministerial Conferences on the protection of forest in Europe (MCPFE) and significant progress has been made in drawing up programmes.
Když však takové programy nejsou k dispozici, přijetí programů rozvoje venkova (PRV) a operačních programů (OP) jako jejich ekvivalentu se zdá být oprávněným řešením, díky němuž nebude docházet k brždění provádění opatření v lesnictví v těchto programech. 
However, when such programmes are not available, the acceptance of rural development programmes (RDPs) and operational programmes (OPs) as equivalent seems to be a justified approach in order not to hamper the implementation of the forestry measures in the programmes.
Pro zajištění kvality schválených programů byla ve spolupráci se všemi navazujícími službami komise provedena hloubková analýza, která zahrnovala intenzivní kontakty s členskými státy. 
In order to ensure the quality of the approved programmes an in-depth analysis was made in collaboration with all associated Commission services which included intensive contacts with the Member States.
Tento proces nějakou dobu trval. 
This process took time.
Pro zajištění dostačující aktualizace opatření, jako jsou zalesňování a znovuzalesňování, je třeba mít dlouhodobé smlouvy. 
Long-term contracts are necessary to ensure sufficient uptake of measures like afforestation of agricultural land.
Svou povahou zasahují do několika programových období. 
By their nature they affect several programming periods.
Pokud jde o délku a trvání smluv a částky pomoci, návrhy rámce rozvoje venkova pro období po roce 2006 obsahují řadu úprav, které mají tyto problémy zmírnit, a to především prostřednictvím snížení délky a stropu náhrady ušlých příjmů. 
As for as the duration of the contracts and the amounts of aid are concerned, the proposals for the rural development framework for the post 2006 period contain a number of modifications to mitigate these problems, notably by reducing the duration and the ceiling for compensation of loss of income.
Komise si je vědoma toho, že se jedná o složitý systém, a proto již zavedla zjednodušení a navrhla pro rámec rozvoje venkova pro období po roce 2006 další podstatné kroky. 
The Commission is aware of the fact that the system is complex and has consequently already introduced simplifications and proposed further substantial steps for the post 2006 rural development framework.
Jedním ze zjednodušení je zavedení jediného fondu pro rozvoj venkova. 
One of the simplifications is the introduction of a single Fund for rural development.
ODPOVĚDI KOMISE X. — Provádění opatření v lesnictví se řídí principem subsidiarity. 
X.Ń The implementation of the forestry measures is guided by the principle of subsidiarity.
Typ půdy určené k zalesnění je z velké míry záležitostí členských států a měl by být určen podle vnitrostátní a regionální situace a podle potřeby. 
The type of land to be afforested is largely a matter for the Member States to decide on basis of the national and regional situation and need.
Návrh politiky rozvoje venkova pro období po roce 2006 zahrnuje několik prvků zlepšeného ekologického řešení při výběru půdy pro zalesnění. — Kompatibilita s životním prostředím je právním požadavkem. 
The proposal for the post 2006 rural development policy contains several elements for improved environmental targeting in the selection of land for afforestation. Ń Compatibility with the environment is a legal requirement.
Členské státy tuto povinnost podle svých regionálních podmínek plní. — Většina programů zahrnuje výběrová kritéria, ale uznává se, že v některých případech může být zapotřebí upřesnit jejich definici. 
Member States implement this obligation on basis of the regional conditions. Ń Most programmes include selection criteria, but it is recognised that in some cases there may be a need to improve the definition of these.
Auditní služby Komise ověřují systémy výběru na základě svých vlastních zásad. 
The Commission audit services verify the selection systems on the basis of guidelines it has issued.
Neprůhlednost nebo neobjektivita při výběru projektů nese za následek doporučení určená danému členskému státu a může také vést k finančním opravám v rámci rozhodnutí při schvalování účetní závěrky. — Definice „zemědělské půdy“ a „zemědělce“ jsou v kompetenci členských států a musí být uvedeny ve vnitrostátních nebo regionálních programech. 
Non-transparency or non-objectivity in the project selection entails recommendations addressed to the Member State and may also lead to financial corrections within the clearance of accounts decisions. Ń The definitions of Ôagricultural landŐ and a ÔfarmerŐ are within the competence of the Member States and must be indicated in the national or regional programmes.
Ověřování musí být zajištěno členskými státy a musí odpovídat zásadám vydaným Komisí. 
Verifications must be ensured by the Member States and in accordance with guidelines issued by the Commission.
Komise si je vědoma, že existuje prostor pro zlepšení, a pro příští programové období prověří požadavky a bude členským státům v otázkách zmíněných soudem více nápomocna; 
The Commission recognises that there is scope for improvements and will for the next programming period review requirements and provide more guidance to Member States for the issues mentioned by the Court.
18.3.2005 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 67/21 — Komise také vymezila nedostatky podobné těm, které byly zmíněny soudem, a zavedla finanční opravy. 
18.3.2005 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 67/21 Ń The Commission has also identified weaknesses similar to those mentioned by the Court and has imposed financial corrections.
Byla zavedena regulační opatření, která by měla zlepšit ověřování nároků. — Auditní služby Komise se při své práci zaměřují především na dodržování příslušných kontrolních postupů při nabídkových řízeních na veřejné zakázky týkající se všech opatření, která opravňují veřejné subjekty k získání pomoci z rozvoje venkova. 
Regulatory steps have been undertaken to improve the verification of claims. Ń In their work, the Commission audit services pay particular attention to the respect of proper control procedures for public contract tendering for all measures allowing for aid under rural development to be granted to public bodies.
THE EU STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION 15. 
THE EU STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION 15.
The concept of sustainability is consistent with the notion introduced and defined by the „Bruntland Report“ to the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, which now applies to all sectors of the economy and sustainable development strategies developed worldwide. 
The concept of sustainability is consistent with the notion introduced and defined by the ÔBruntland ReportŐ to the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1987, which now applies to all sectors of the economy and sustainable development strategies developed worldwide.
Sustainable forest management is based on the balanced integration of economic, social and environmental objectives. 
Sustainable forest management is based on the balanced integration of economic, social and environmental objectives.
There may be conflicts between the three types of objectives, but these conflicts should be seen as healthy ones, and they should give rise to cooperation between different interest groups and a constructive search for the best solution. 
There may be conflicts between the three types of objectives, but these conflicts should be seen as healthy ones, and they should give rise to cooperation between different interest groups and a constructive search for the best solution.
The progress achieved in the establishment of criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management as well as in the use of voluntary schemes to certify sustainable managed forests in the EU are indicative of the progress achieved in the last years towards sustainable forest management. 
The progress achieved in the establishment of criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management as well as in the use of voluntary schemes to certify sustainable managed forests in the EU are indicative of the progress achieved in the last years towards sustainable forest management.
Sustainable forest management requires a participatory approach and involvement of all relevant stakeholders in order to build consensus and to find satisfactory approaches. 
Sustainable forest management requires a participatory approach and involvement of all relevant stakeholders in order to build consensus and to find satisfactory approaches.
Countries are developing appropriate mechanisms and structures for the participation of stakeholders in forest policy formulation and implementation processes, notably in the context of their national forest programmes. 
Countries are developing appropriate mechanisms and structures for the participation of stakeholders in forest policy formulation and implementation processes, notably in the context of their national forest programmes.
In Member States that for socio-economic reasons in the past put more emphasis on the economic development of the sector, are gradually considering and developing strategies towards diversification and incorporating environmental and social objectives. 
In Member States that for socio-economic reasons in the past put more emphasis on the economic development of the sector, are gradually considering and developing strategies towards diversification and incorporating environmental and social objectives.
Sustainability and sustainable development do not define a static state of stability, but rather a dynamic process of change with the goal of continuous improvement. 
Sustainability and sustainable development do not define a static state of stability, but rather a dynamic process of change with the goal of continuous improvement.
Forest definition lies within the competence of the Member States. 
Forest definition lies within the competence of the Member States.
The differences respond to historical, social, legal and ecological conditions in the countries. 
The differences respond to historical, social, legal and ecological conditions in the countries.
However, for statistical purposes the Member States adjust the data according to a common method developed within the context of the Joint FAO/UNECE/Eurostat/ITTO questionnaire for collecting forest statistics. 
However, for statistical purposes the Member States adjust the data according to a common method developed within the context of the Joint FAO/UNECE/Eurostat/ITTO questionnaire for collecting forest statistics.
In this way, the forest data become comparable both with regard to forest area and stand volume. 
In this way, the forest data become comparable both with regard to forest area and stand volume.
The Commission considers that the quality of monitoring can be assured without a common definition of forest. 
The Commission considers that the quality of monitoring can be assured without a common definition of forest.
The outcome of the policy can be monitored at Member State level against the objectives set in the RDPs, allowing subsequently an assessment at EU level (eg. ex post evaluations). 
The outcome of the policy can be monitored at Member State level against the objectives set in the RDPs, allowing subsequently an assessment at EU level (eg. ex post evaluations).
As indicated in paragraph 17, forest-related data are made comparable between countries. 
As indicated in paragraph 17, forest-related data are made comparable between countries.
Regular reporting by Member States, based on commonly agreed monitoring indicators, enables the measurement of progress in the implementation in the RDPs. 
Regular reporting by Member States, based on commonly agreed monitoring indicators, enables the measurement of progress in the implementation in the RDPs.
XI. 
XI. tain their own forests.
Orgány, které projekty schvalují, by od obcí měly vyžadovat dostatečné důkazy o tom, že jsou údržbové práce zajišťovány. 
The authorities approving projects should require sufficient evidence from the municipalities that the maintenance work is ensured.
Aby zalesňování bylo pro zemědělce přitažlivé, musí jim být poskytovány dlouhodobé náhrady. 
A long-term compensation is necessary for afforestation of agricultural land to be attractive to farmers.
V návrzích rámce rozvoje venkova pro období po roce 2006 se však očekává omezení náhrad ušlých příjmů na dobu 10 let. 
Nevertheless, the proposals for post 2006 rural development framework provide to limit the compensation for income loss to 10 years.
Kromě celkového dopadu by měl být vzat v úvahu i významný účinek, který toto opatření bude mít v některých konkrétních regionech. 
On top of the overall impact account should be taken on the significant effect in certain specific regions.
Udržitelnost je již přetrvávající zásadou nařízení (ES) č. 1257/1999. 
Sustainability is already an overarching principle of Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999.
Návrhy rámce rozvoje venkova pro období po roce 2006 dodržují toto doporučení i tím, že výslovněji zaměřují zalesnění na ekologické cíle a že vyžadují určení oblastí vhodných pro (a tudíž omezených na) zalesnění z ekologických důvodů. 
The proposals for post 2006 rural development framework further meet this recommendation by targeting afforestation more explicitly on environmental objectives and by requiring designation of areas suitable for (and thus limited to) afforestation for environmental reasons.
The Council Resolution on an EU forestry strategy provided a reference framework for forest-related activities in the EU. 
The Council Resolution on an EU forestry strategy provided a reference framework for forest-related activities in the EU.
It is important to note that the strategy confirmed the subsidiarity principle applied in the forestry area. 
It is important to note that the strategy confirmed the subsidiarity principle applied in the forestry area.
With regard to the principle of subsidiarity the Commission considers that a number of implementation decisions remain at the discretion of the Member States, as it is expressed in various parts of the Commission’s reply to this report. 
With regard to the principle of subsidiarity the Commission considers that a number of implementation decisions remain at the discretion of the Member States, as it is expressed in various parts of the CommissionŐs reply to this report.
The rural development Regulation is based on the principle of subsidiarity and it is up to the Member States to draw up their rural development programmes, considering national and regional priorities. 
The rural development Regulation is based on the principle of subsidiarity and it is up to the Member States to draw up their rural development programmes, considering national and regional priorities.
The Commission carried out an evaluation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 in 2001 and clearer guidelines for monitoring measures were introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999. 
The Commission carried out an evaluation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2080/92 in 2001 and clearer guidelines for monitoring measures were introduced by Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999.
With this regulation the requirement for an ex ante evaluation of rural development programmes (RDPs) has been introduced, as well as a thorough mid-term evaluation of these, which would lead, if necessary, to an adaptation of the programmes concerned. 
With this regulation the requirement for an ex ante evaluation of rural development programmes (RDPs) has been introduced, as well as a thorough mid-term evaluation of these, which would lead, if necessary, to an adaptation of the programmes concerned.
C 67/22 CS Úřední věstník Evropské unie 18.3.2005 19. 
C 67/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 18.3.2005 19.
The shared management and the Commission responsibilities for the implementation of the EU forestry strategy were established by the Council in its Resolution of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union. 
The shared management and the Commission responsibilities for the implementation of the EU forestry strategy were established by the Council in its Resolution of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union.
It should be noted that evaluation is an integral part of the programme management and assesses the degree of achievement of the programme objectives. 
It should be noted that evaluation is an integral part of the programme management and assesses the degree of achievement of the programme objectives.
Being part of the CAP the forestry measures are implemented under shared management and the Commission thereby considers that a number of implementation decisions remain at the discretion of the Member States. 
Being part of the CAP the forestry measures are implemented under shared management and the Commission thereby considers that a number of implementation decisions remain at the discretion of the Member States.
The Commission has to assess the conformity of programmes with the Community objectives and legislation. 
The Commission has to assess the conformity of programmes with the Community objectives and legislation.
The implementation of the approved programmes is delegated to Member States. 
The implementation of the approved programmes is delegated to Member States.
This includes all contacts with the beneficiary from the assessment of the project to the final payment. 
This includes all contacts with the beneficiary from the assessment of the project to the final payment.
The Commission supervises the implementation of programmes via monitoring and evaluation. 
The Commission supervises the implementation of programmes via monitoring and evaluation.
It audits the conformity of the implementation with the approved programmes and the relevant Community rules in order to assess any possible risk to the Funds and to assume final responsibility for the execution of the Community budget. 
It audits the conformity of the implementation with the approved programmes and the relevant Community rules in order to assess any possible risk to the Funds and to assume final responsibility for the execution of the Community budget.
If the Commission audits reveal deficiencies in Member States’ management and control systems and/or non-conformity with Community rules in project implementation, financial corrections may be proposed within the Commission clearance of account procedure. 
If the Commission audits reveal deficiencies in Member StatesŐ management and control systems and/or non-conformity with Community rules in project implementation, financial corrections may be proposed within the Commission clearance of account procedure.