natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
podrobný popis již přijatých a plánovaných opatření pro splnění tohoto rozhodnutí, včetně závazku stanoveného v příloze I;
The recoverable amounts should be limited, for each of the years concerned, to the difference between the compatible amount for that year, as determined according to recitals 251, 252 and 253, and the amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned.
doklady prokazující, že příjemcům bylo nařízeno podporu vrátit a že je splněn závazek stanovený v příloze I.
The amount of EEG-surcharge that was actually paid by the beneficiary in the year concerned is in principle obtained by applying the reduced surcharge for that year to the beneficiary's electricity consumption in that same year.
Německo bude Komisi informovat o vývoji vnitrostátních opatření přijatých k provedení tohoto rozhodnutí až do úplného navrácení podpory uvedené v čl. 3 odst. 2 a splnění závazku uvedeného v příloze I.
However, in order to speed up the recovery, and as the consumption data for the years concerned is not yet available for all undertakings concerned by recovery, Germany will, as a first step, use the electricity consumption that was submitted in the applications to calculate a preliminary recovery amount, to be recovered immediately.
Na žádost Komise předloží Německo neprodleně veškeré informace o již přijatých či plánovaných opatřeních pro splnění tohoto rozhodnutí.
Germany will, as a second step, apply the actual consumption data of the years concerned in order to determine the final recovery amounts and take the necessary steps to ensure recovery or repayment on the basis of those final amounts (this second step in the recovery process is referred to as the ‘correction mechanism’).
Poskytne rovněž podrobné informace o výši podpory a úrocích, které již příjemci navrátili.
The first step in determining the compatible amount lies in the application of Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines.
Článek 9
The undertaking which benefited from the reduction must belong to the sectors listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 185 of the 2014 Guidelines) or, failing this, the undertaking must have an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and belong to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, even if it does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines (point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Německo se zavázalo reinvestovat částku ve výši 50 milionů EUR do propojovacích vedení a evropských energetických projektů.
For the application of point 186 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
Německo bude Komisi informovat o plnění tohoto závazku.
Moreover, if the undertaking is eligible on the basis of recital 251, the undertaking must pay at least 15 % of the additional costs without reduction (point 188 of the 2014 Guidelines).
Článek 10
However, the payable amount can be limited at undertaking level to 4 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned.
Toto rozhodnutí je určeno Spolkové republice Německo.
Moreover, for undertakings having an electro-intensity of at least 20 %, the payable amount can be limited to 0,5 % of the gross value added of the undertaking concerned (point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines).
V Bruselu dne 25. listopadu 2014.
For the application of point 189 of the 2014 Guidelines, as explained in recital 202, the data submitted in the applications made in respect of the years concerned may be used.
Za Komisi
If the undertaking is not eligible on the basis of recital 251, the payable amount is, according to Section 3.7.2 of the 2014 Guidelines, in principle equivalent to the EEG-surcharge without reduction, subject to the transit rule in point 197 of the 2014 Guidelines.
členka Komise
If, for either of the years concerned, the payable amount determined on the basis of recital 252 is higher than the amount that was actually paid by the beneficiary in that year, the provisions of the adjustment plan will apply as set out in recital 212: For 2013, the compatible amount should not exceed 125 % of the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 (that is to say, the same year).
Úř. věst.
For 2014, the compatible amount should not exceed 150 % of the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 (that is to say, the previous year).
C 37, 7.2.2014, s. 73, a Úř. věst.
As explained in recital 250, the surcharge that was actually paid in 2013 and 2014 may, for the purpose of determining the preliminary recovery amount, be based on electricity consumption data included in the undertaking's application for the reduction in 2013 and 2014.
C 250, 1.8.2014, s. 15.
For the purpose of the correction mechanism, the actual electricity consumption data for 2013 and 2014 will be used once it is available.
Viz poznámka pod čarou 1.
If the payable amount determined on the basis of recitals 251, 252 and 253 is not higher than the amount that was actually paid by the beneficiary in either of the years concerned, there will be no recovery.
Nařízení č. 1 o užívání jazyků v Evropském hospodářském společenství (Úřední věstník, řada I, svazek 1952–1958, s. 59).
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is less than EUR 200000 and where the aid meets all the other criteria of either Commission Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 [117] or Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 [118], such aid should be deemed not to constitute State aid in the sense of Article 107(1) of the Treaty, and should therefore not be subject to recovery.
Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – EEG), ve znění zákona Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechtsrahmens für die Förderung der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 1634, a Gesetz zur Änderung des Rechtsrahmens für Strom aus solarer Strahlungsenergie und zu weiteren Änderungen im Recht der erneuerbaren Energien vom 17.
Where the total amount of aid received by a beneficiary is more than EUR 200000, of which an amount of less than EUR 200000 has to be recovered, Regulations (EC) No 1998/2006 and (EU) No 1407/2013 do not apply, because the aid concerns the same eligible costs and cumulation is therefore excluded (Article 5(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1407/2013 and Article 2(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006).
August 2012, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 1754.
Such amounts should therefore have to be recovered.
Juli 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 1066.
The Commission has further examined whether there are any obstacles to recovery pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 659/1999.
Státní podpora SA.38632 (2014/N) – Německo: EEG 2014 – Reforma zákona o energii z obnovitelných zdrojů (dosud nezveřejněno v Úředním věstníku).
As described in recital 172, some interested parties have argued that the adjustment in 2013 and 2014 should be as small as possible in order to safeguard the beneficiaries' legitimate expectations, and that no recovery should take place.
Juli 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 2101, ve znění § 2 zákona Gesetz vom 17.
However, for the reasons stated in recitals 146 et seq., the Commission's decision in case NN 27/00 cannot give rise to legitimate expectations on the part of the beneficiaries, given that the EEG-Act 2012 is different from the EEG-Act 2000 and was adopted more than 10 years later and that in particular the BesAR did not exist in the EEG-Act 2000,
Februar 2010, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 134, ve znění předpisu Zweite Verordnung zur Änderung der Ausgleichsmechanismus-Ausführungsverordnung vom 19.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Februar 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 310.
Article 1
Takovéto omezení je přiznáno i železničním podnikům.
The State aid for the support of electricity production from renewable energy sources and from mine gas, including its financing mechanism, granted on the basis of the Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2012 (EEG-Act 2012), unlawfully put into effect by Germany in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty, is compatible with the internal market subject to the implementation of the commitment set out in Annex I by Germany.
Tento strop však není v rámci tohoto rozhodnutí přezkoumán.
Article 2
Úř. věst.
The Commission accepts the adjustment plan submitted by Germany in respect of the years 2013 and 2014, as set out in Annex II.
C 200, 28.6.2014, s. 1.
Article 3
Věci TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf v.
The State aid consisting of reductions in the surcharge for the funding of support for electricity from renewable sources (EEG-surcharge) in the years 2013 and 2014 for energy-intensive users (Besondere Ausgleichsregelung, BesAR), unlawfully put into effect by Germany in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty, is compatible with the internal market if it falls into one of the four categories set out in this paragraph.
Komise, T-244/93 a T-486/93, ECLI:EU:T:1995;160.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking which belongs to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the Guidelines on State aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-20 (2014 Guidelines), it is compatible with the internal market if the undertaking paid at least 15 % of the additional costs faced by electricity suppliers due to obligations to buy renewable energy which are subsequently passed on to their customers.
Podle § 11 předpisu AusglMechV může agentura BNetzA vydat předpisy po dohodě se Spolkovým ministerstvem životního prostředí, ochrany přírody a bezpečnosti reaktorů (nyní Spolkové ministerstvo životního prostředí, ochrany přírody, stavebnictví a bezpečnosti reaktorů) a Spolkovým ministerstvem hospodářství a technologií (nyní Spolkové ministerstvo hospodářství a energetiky).
If the undertaking paid less than 15 % of those additional costs, the State aid is nevertheless compatible if the undertaking paid an amount that corresponds to at least 4 % of its gross value added or, for undertakings having an electro-intensity of at least 20 %, at least 0,5 % of gross value added.
Juli 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 1970, 3621, ve znění § 3 odst. 4 zákona Gesetz vom 4.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking which does not belong to a sector listed in Annex 3 to the 2014 Guidelines but had an electro-intensity of at least 20 % in 2012 and belonged, in that year, to a sector with a trade intensity of at least 4 % at Union level, it is compatible with the internal market if the undertaking paid at least 15 % of the additional costs faced by electricity suppliers due to obligations to buy renewable energy which were subsequently passed on to electricity consumers.
Oktober 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, část I, s. 3746.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, but the amount of the EEG-surcharge paid by that undertaking did not reach the level required by those subparagraphs, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2009/28/ES ze dne 23. dubna 2009 o podpoře využívání energie z obnovitelných zdrojů a o změně a následném zrušení směrnic 2001/77/ES a 2003/30/ES (Úř. věst.
for 2013, the part of the aid which exceeds 125 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013;
L 140, 5.6.2009, s. 16).
for 2014, the part of the aid which exceeds 150 % of the surcharge that the undertaking actually paid in 2013.
Věc PreussenElektra v.
Where the State aid was granted to an undertaking not eligible for compatible State aid on the basis of the second or third subparagraph, and where the undertaking paid less than 20 % of the additional costs of the surcharge without reduction, the following parts of the aid are compatible:
Schleswag, C-379/98, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160.
Any aid that is not covered by paragraph 1 is incompatible with the internal market.
Věc Doux Élevage, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348.
Article 4
Úř. věst.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 does not constitute aid if, at the time it was granted, it fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 994/98 [119] which was applicable at the time the aid was granted.Article 5
C 164, 10.7.2002, s. 5.
Individual aid granted on the basis of the aid schemes referred to in Articles 1 and 3 which, at the time it was granted, fulfilled the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 994/98, or by any approved aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market, up to maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.
Věc Altmark Trans, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Article 6
Věc Essent Netwerk Noord, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
Germany shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) from the beneficiaries according to the method described in Annex III.
Věc Association Vent de Colère!, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
Věc Ålands Vindkraft, C-573/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2037.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [120].
Věc Altmark Trans, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, body 87 až 93.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the scheme referred to in Article 3(2) with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Kritéria v rozsudku ve věci Altmark Soudní dvůr stanovil s cílem objasnit, za jakých okolností se vyrovnávací platba poskytovaná orgánem veřejné moci za poskytování služby obecného hospodářského zájmu považuje za státní podporu podle čl. 107 odst. 1 Smlouvy.
Article 7
K doložení tohoto tvrzení citovalo Německo zprávu Rady evropských energetických regulátorů (CEER) ze dne 25. června 2013 s názvem „Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe“ (Přezkum stavu režimů podpory energie z obnovitelných zdrojů a energetické účinnosti v Evropě), (zejména tabulky na s. 18–20).
Recovery of the incompatible aid referred to in Article 3(2) shall be immediate and effective.
Věc Banco Exterior de España, C-387/92, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, bod 13; věc Německo v.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision by recovering the incompatible aid granted.
Komise, C-156/98, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, bod 25; věc Itálie v.
Where Germany recovers only the preliminary recovery amounts set out in paragraph 4 of Annex III, Germany shall ensure that the correction mechanism described in paragraph 4 of Annex III is implemented within one year following the date of notification of this Decision.
Komise, C-6/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, bod 15; věc Heiser, C-172/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, bod 36; věc GEMO SA, C-126/01, ECLI:EU:C:2003:622, body 28 až 31 týkající se volného shromažďování a odstraňování odpadů.
Article 8
Věc Itálie v.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information:
Komise, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, bod 17.
the list of beneficiaries that have received aid referred to in Article 3(1) and (2) and the total amount of aid received by each of them under the scheme;
Viz rovněž věc CETM v.
the total preliminary recovery amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
Komise, T-55/99, ECLI:EU:T:2000:223, bod 85.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision, including the commitment set out in Annex I;
Věc Alcoa Trasformazioni v.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid and that the commitment set out in Annex I is complied with.
Komise, T-177/10, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, body 82 až 85.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 3(2) has been completed and the commitment set out in Annex I is fully implemented.
Věc Alcoa Trasformazioni v.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
Komise, T-177/10, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, bod 82.
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
Věc Alcoa Trasformazioni v.
Article 9
Komise, T-177/10, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, bod 84.
Germany has committed to reinvest EUR 50 million in interconnectors and in European energy projects.
Věc Alcoa Trasformazioni v.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the implementation of this commitment.
Komise, T-177/10, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, bod 85.
Article 10
Věc Adria-Wien Pipeline, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, bod 48.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
Spojené věci Paint Graphos, C-78/08 až C-80/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:550, bod 69.
Done at Brussels, 25 November 2014.
Věc Belgie v.
For the Commission
Komise, C-75/97, ECLI:EU:C:1999:311, bod 38 a následující body; věc Heiser, C-172/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130; věc British Aggregates Association v.
Member of the Commission
Komise, C-487/06 P, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757, body 86 až 92; věc Adria-Wien Pipeline, C-143/99, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, body 43, 52 a následující body.
OJ C 37, 7.2.2014, p. 73, and OJ C 250, 1.8.2014, p. 15.
Věc Altmark Trans, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, bod 87.
Cf. footnote 1.
Věc Altmark Trans, C-280/00, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, body 89 až 93.
Regulation No 1 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ Series I, Volume 1952-1958, p. 59).
Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2009/72/ES ze dne 13. července 2009 o společných pravidlech pro vnitřní trh s elektřinou a o zrušení směrnice 2003/54/ES (Úř. věst.
Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz — EEG), as amended by Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechtsrahmens für die Förderung der Stromerzeugung aus erneuerbaren Energien, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1634, and by Gesetz zur Änderung des Rechtsrahmens für Strom aus solarer Strahlungsenergie und zu weiteren Änderungen im Recht der erneuerbaren Energien vom 17.
L 211, 14.8.2009, s. 55).
August 2012, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1754.
Spojené věci Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy a další, 67/85, 68/85 a 70/85, ECLI:EU:C:1988:38; věc Danske Busvognmænd v.
Juli 2014, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1066.
Komise, T-157/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76; spojené věci Hotel Cipriani a další v.
State aid case SA.38632 (2014/N) — Germany: EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law (not yet published in the Official Journal).
Komise, T-254/00, T-270/00 a T-277/00, ECLI:EU:T:2008:537.
Juli 2009, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 2101, as amended by Article 2 of Gesetz vom 17.
Spojené věci Kwekerij Gebroeders van der Kooy a další, 67/85, 68/85 a 70/85, ECLI:EU:C:1988:38, bod 30.
Februar 2010, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 134, as amended by the Zweite Verordnung zur Änderung der Ausgleichsmechanismus-Ausführungsverordnung vom 19.
Věc Danske Busvognmænd v.
Februar 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 310.
Komise, T-157/01, ECLI:EU:T:2004:76, bod 57.
The cap is also granted to railway undertakings.
Spojené věci Hotel Cipriani a další v.
This cap is not examined in the framework of this decision.
Komise, T-254/00, T-270/00 a T-277/00, ECLI:EU:T:2008:537, bod 185.
OJ C 200, 28.6.2014, p. 1.
Věc Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ a další v.
Cases T-244/93 and T-486/93, TWD Textilwerke Deggendorf v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:1995; 160.
Komise, C-71/09 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368.
According to § 11 AusglMechV, the BNetzA can enact regulations in agreement with the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (now Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety) and the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (now Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy).
Věc Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ a další v.
Juli 2005, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 1970, 3621, as amended by Article 3(4) of Gesetz vom 4.
Komise, C-71/09 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, bod 92.
Oktober 2013, Bundesgesetzblatt, Part I, p. 3746.
Věc Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ a další v.
Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16).
Komise, C-71/09 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, bod 95.
Case C-379/98, PreussenElektra v Schleswag, ECLI:EU:C:2001:160.
Věc Comitato „Venezia vuole vivere“ a další v.
Case C-677/11, Doux Élevage.
Komise, C-71/09 P, ECLI:EU:C:2011:368, bod 96.
ECLI:EU:C:2013:348.
Věc Německo v.
OJ C 164, 10.7.2002, p. 5.
Komise, T-295/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:675, bod 144; věc Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung v.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415.
Komise, T-309/12, ECLI:EU:T:2014:676, bod 261.
Case C-206/06, Essent Netwerk Noord, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413.
Věc British Telecommunications a další v.
Case C-262/12, Association Vent de Colère!, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851.
Komise, T-226/09, ECLI:EU:T:2013:466, bod 71.
Case C-573/12, Ålands Vindkraft, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2037.
Viz závěry generálního advokáta Watheleta v rozsudku ve věci Commerz Nederland, C-242/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:308, bod 75 a následující body.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 87 to 93.
Věc Steinike & Weinlig v.
The Altmark criteria have been set out by the Court of Justice to clarify under what circumstances a compensation provided by a public authority for the performance of a Service of General Economic Interest (‘SGEI’) qualifies as State aid under Article 107(1) of the Treaty.
Německo, C-78/76, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, bod 21.
In support of this argument, Germany cites the Council of European Energy Regulators' (CEER) report of 25 June 2013, titled ‘Status Review of Renewable and Energy Efficiency Support Schemes in Europe’ (in particular, the tables at pages 18-20).
Věc Doux Élevage, C-677/11, ECLI:EU:C:2013:348, bod 35.
Case C-387/92, Banco Exterior de España, ECLI:EU:C:1994:100, paragraph 13; Case C-156/98, Germany v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2000:467, paragraph 25; Case C-6/97, Italy v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:1999:251, paragraph 15; Case C-172/03, Heiser, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130, paragraph 36; Case C-126/01, GEMO SA, ECLI:EU:C:2003:622, paragraphs 28 to 31 on the free collection and disposal of waste.
Věc Association Vent de Colère!, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, body 16 až 20.
Case 173/73, Italy v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, paragraph 17.
Věc Steinike & Weinlig v.
Case T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, paragraphs 82 to 85.
Německo, C-78/76, ECLI:EU:C:1977:52, bod 21; věc Itálie v.
Case T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, paragraph 82.
Komise, 173/73, EU:C:1974:71, bod 16; věc Francie v.
Case T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, paragraph 84.
Komise, 259/85, ECLI:EU:C:1987:478, bod 23; věc Essent Netwerk Noord, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, bod 66.
Case T-177/10, Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2014:897, paragraph 85.
Věc Itálie v.
Case C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, paragraph 48.
Komise, 173/73, ECLI:EU:C:1974:71, bod 16.
Joined cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, Paint Graphos, ECLI:EU:C:2011:550, paragraph 69.
Věc Francie v.
Case C-75/97, Belgium v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:1999:311, paragraph 38 et seq.; Case C-172/03, Heiser, ECLI:EU:C:2005:130; Case C-487/06 P, British Aggregates Association v Commission, ECLI:EU:C:2008:757, paragraphs 86 to 92; Case C-143/99, Adria-Wien Pipeline, ECLI:EU:C:2001:598, paragraphs 43, 52 et seq.
Komise, T-139/09, ECLI:EU:T:2012:496, body 63 a 64.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraph 87.
Věc Essent Netwerk Noord, C-206/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:413, bod 70; věc Association Vent de Colère!, C-262/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:851, bod 20.
Case C-280/00, Altmark Trans, ECLI:EU:C:2003:415, paragraphs 89 to 93.
Věc Sloman Neptun v.
Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 55).