natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 22. prosince 1993 – K(93) 3964/6 – Konver I – a rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 21. prosince 1995 – K(95) 3208 – Konver II.
RECOVERY
Projekty přeměny přijaté spolkovou zemí Porýní-Falc zahrnovaly projekt týkající se „vojenského letiště Zweibrücken“.
In accordance with the Treaty and the Court of Justice's established case-law, the Commission is competent to decide that the Member State concerned must abolish or alter aid [113] when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market.
Financování Unií dosáhlo částky ve výši 9 milionů EUR.
The Court has also consistently held that the obligation on a State to abolish aid regarded by the Commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation [114].
http://www.flughafen-zweibruecken.de/de/wir-ueber-uns-de/daten-und-fakten-de
In this context, the Court has stated that that objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored [115].
Všechny vzdálenosti v silničních km podle nejrychlejší trasy.
Following that case-law, Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 [116] laid down that ‘where negative decisions are taken in respect of unlawful aid, the Commission shall decide that the Member State concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary’.
Zdroj:
Therefore, the State aid mentioned above (see recitals 282, 297, 318, 320, 395 and 405, taking into account recitals 198 to 200) must be reimbursed to Germany, insofar as it has been paid out.
maps.google.com, prohlíženo dne 25. června 2014.
Table 9 indicates the approximate recovery amounts.
Desel Consulting a Airport Research Center GmbH, „Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025“, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH , září 2009, s. 56.
Table 9
Informace, na něž se vztahuje profesní tajemství.
Information about the approximate amounts of aid received, to be recovered and already recovered
Rozsudek ve spojených věcech Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG a Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v.
Identity of the beneficiary
Komise, T-443/08 a T-455/08 (dále jen „rozsudek ve věci Leipzig/Halle“), Sb. rozh.
Total approximate amount of aid received (in EUR)
2011, s. II-1311, zejména body 93 a 94;
Total approximate amount of aid to be recovered [117] (in EUR)
potvrzený rozsudkem ve věci Mitteldeutsche Flughafen a Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v.
(Principal)
Komise, C-288/11 P, Sb. rozh.
Total amount already reimbursed (in EUR)
2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821.
Principal
Rozhodnutí Komise 2005/842/ES ze dne 28. listopadu 2005 o použití čl. 86 odst. 2 Smlouvy o ES na státní podporu ve formě vyrovnávací platby za závazek veřejné služby poskytované určitým podnikům pověřeným poskytováním služeb obecného hospodářského zájmu (Úř. věst.
Recovery interest [118]
L 312, 29.11.2005, s. 67).
Direct Investment Grants
Rozhodnutí Komise 2012/21/EU ze dne 20. prosince 2011 o použití čl. 106 odst. 2 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské unie na státní podporu ve formě vyrovnávací platby za závazek veřejné služby udělené určitým podnikům pověřeným poskytováním služeb obecného hospodářského zájmu (Úř. věst.
Capital Injections
L 7, 11.1.2012, s. 3).
100 % Guarantee
Sdělení Komise – Rámec Evropské unie pro státní podporu ve formě vyrovnávací platby za závazek veřejné služby (2011) (Úř. věst.
Cash-Pool Participation
C 8, 11.1.2012, s. 15).
To take account of the actual advantage received by the airline and its subsidiaries under the agreements, the amounts indicated in Table 9 may be adjusted, according to the supporting evidence provided by Germany, based on (i) the difference between, on the one hand, actual payments as presented ex post, that were made by the airline with regard to the airport charges (including the landing fee, the passenger fee and ground handling services under the airport services agreement), and on the other hand the forecasted cash flows (ex ante) on these items of income and shown in Table 8, and (ii) the difference between, on the one hand, the actual marketing payments as presented ex post which were paid to the airline or its subsidiaries under marketing services agreements and, other the other hand, the marketing costs as foreseen ex ante, corresponding to the amounts indicated in Table 8,
Sdělení Komise o revizi metody stanovování referenčních a diskontních sazeb ze dne 12. prosince 2007 (Úř. věst.
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
C 14, 19.1.2008, s. 6).
Article 1
Sdělení Komise o použití článků 87 a 88 Smlouvy o ES na státní podpory ve formě záruk (Úř. věst.
The State aid, unlawfully put into effect by Germany in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty in favour of Flugplatz GmbH Aeroville Zweibrücken (‘FGAZ’)/Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH (‘FZG’) between 2000 and 2009 by means of direct investment grants, annual capital injections, the grant of a 100 % guarantee on a bank loan free of charge, and allowing FGAZ to participate in Land Rhineland-Pfalz's cash-pool, is incompatible with the internal market.
C 155, 20.6.2008, s. 10).
The State aid, unlawfully put into effect by Germany in breach of Article 108(3) of the Treaty in favour of Germanwings, TUIFly and Ryanair/AMS by means of the airport services agreements and marketing services agreements concluded on 15 September 2006 (Germanwings), 1 April 2008 (TUIFly), and 22 September 2008/6 October 2008 (Ryanair/Airport Marketing Services (‘AMS’)) is incompatible with the internal market.
Předloženo jako příloha 8 podání Německa ze dne 27. ledna 2011.
Article 2
Prof.
The loan granted to FZG by Sparkasse Südwestpfalz does not constitute State aid.
Dr. Heuer a Prof.
The airport services agreement concluded by FZG with Germanwings on 30 June 2008 does not constitute State aid.
Dr. Klophaus ve spolupráci s Dr. Bersterem a p. Wilkenem, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, leden 2006, „Regionalökonomische Bedeutung und Perspektiven des Flugplatzes Zweibrücken“, s. 146;
Article 3
Desel Consulting a Airport Research Center GmbH, „Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025“, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, září 2009, s. 85.
Germany shall recover the incompatible aid referred to in Article 1 from the beneficiaries.
Dohoda o poskytování letištních služeb uzavřená mezi společnostmi Ryanair a FZG dne 22. září 2008, oddíl 3.
FGAZ and FZG shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by either of them.
Dokument společnosti Oxera s názvem „Jak by se mělo zacházet s dohodami se společností AMS v rámci analýzy ziskovosti jako součásti kritéria tržně jednajícího hospodářského subjektu?“ ( How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test?), vyhotovený pro společnost Ryanair, 17. ledna 2014.
Ryanair and AMS shall be jointly liable to repay the State aid received by either of them.
Dokument společnosti Oxera s názvem „Jak by se mělo zacházet s dohodami se společností AMS v rámci analýzy ziskovosti jako součásti kritéria tržně jednajícího hospodářského subjektu? – Uplatňování v praxi“ ( How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test? – Practical application), vyhotovený pro společnost Ryanair, 31. ledna 2014.
The sums to be recovered are as follows:
Věc Komise v.
in respect of the direct investment grants granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate and the ZEF in favour of FZG:
Itálie, C-35/96, Recueil 1998, s. I-3851;
EUR 20564170 granted between 12 December 2000 and 31 December 2009, minus the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz to the extent that they were covered by the direct investment grants;
věc Höfner a Elser, C-41/90, Recueil 1991, s. I-1979;
in respect of the annual capital injections granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate and the ZEF in favour of FGAZ:
věc Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances v.
EUR 26629000 granted between 2000 and 2009, minus the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz to the extent that they were covered by the annual capital injections, and minus those sums granted before 12 December 2000;
Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, C-244/94, Recueil 1995, s. I-4013;
in respect of the 100 % guarantee on the loan granted by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate in favour of FZG:
Věc Komise v.
in respect of the participation of FGAZ in the cash-pool of Land Rhineland-Palatinate:
Itálie, 118/85, Recueil 1987, s. 2599;
the cash-equivalent of the advantageous loan conditions, to be determined pursuant to the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007, minus any advantage received on loans that were used to cover the costs of fire brigade services and the costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) Luftsicherheitsgesetz;
věc Komise v.
in respect of the airport services agreement concluded between Germanwings and FZG on 15 September 2006:
Itálie, 35/96, Recueil 1998, s. I-3851.
the amount of incompatible aid;
Rozsudek ve věci Leipzig/Halle, zejména body 93–94;
in respect of the airport services agreement concluded between TUIFly and FZG on 1 April 2008:
potvrzený rozsudkem ve věci Mitteldeutsche Flughafen a Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v.
in respect of the airport services agreement and marketing services agreements concluded between Ryanair and FZG on 22 September 2008 and between AMS and the Land Rhineland-Palatinate on 6 October 2008:
Komise, C-288/11 P, Sb. rozh.
the amount of incompatible aid.
2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:821;
The sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiaries until their actual recovery.
viz rovněž věc Aéroports de Paris v.
Germany shall provide the exact dates on which the aid provided by the State was put at the disposal of the respective beneficiaries.
Komise, T-128/89, Recueil 2000, s. II-3929, potvrzený rozsudkem ve věci Aéroports de Paris v.
The interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 [119].
Komise, C-82/01P, Recueil 2002, s. I-9297, a věc Ryanair v.
Germany shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in Article 1 with effect from the date of adoption of this Decision.
Komise, T-196/04 (dále jen „rozsudek ve věci Charleroi“), Sb. rozh.
Article 4
2008, s. II-3643.
Recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 shall be immediate and effective.
Věci Poucet v.
Germany shall ensure that this Decision is implemented within four months following the date of notification of this Decision.
AGV a Pistre v.
Article 5
Cancave, C-159/91 a C-160/91, Recueil 1993, s. I-637.
Within two months following notification of this Decision, Germany shall submit the following information:
Rozsudek ve věci Leipzig-Halle, body 42–43.
the total amount of aid received by the beneficiaries, and in particular:
Věc Hydrotherm, C-170/83, Recueil 1984, s. I-2999, bod 11.
the amount of direct investment grants, capital injections, and the cash-equivalent of advantageous loans that covered the costs of fire brigade services and costs for which the airport operator is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to §8(3) LuftSiG;
Viz rovněž věc Pollmeier Malchow v.
information on the creditworthiness of FGAZ/FZG when the 100 % guarantee was issued and when each loan from the cash-pool was provided, with a view to enabling the Commission to determine the cash-equivalent of the guarantee and the advantageous conditions of the cash-pool loans in line with the Commission Notice on the application of Article 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees and Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007, respectively;
Komise, T-137/02, Sb. rozh.
the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from each beneficiary;
2004, s. II-3541, bod 50.
a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision;
Společné vykonávání hospodářské činnosti se obvykle posuzuje tak, že se vyhodnotí existence funkčních, ekonomických a organických vazeb mezi subjekty.
documents demonstrating that the beneficiaries have been ordered to repay the aid.
Viz například věc Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA v.
Germany shall keep the Commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this Decision until recovery of the aid referred to in Article 1 has been completed.
Komise, C-480/09 P, Sb. rozh.
It shall immediately submit, on simple request by the Commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this Decision.
2010, s. I-13355, body 47 až 55;
It shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiaries.
věc Ministero dell'Economica e delle Finanze v.
Article 6
Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA a další, C-222/04, Sb. rozh.
This Decision is addressed to the Federal Republic of Germany.
2006, s. I-289, bod 112.
Done at Brussels, 1 October 2014.
Věc Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA v.
For the Commission
Komise, C-480/09 P, Sb. rozh.
Vice-President
2010, s. I-13355, body 47–55;
With effect from 1 December 2009, Articles 87, and 88 of the EC Treaty have become Articles 107 and 108, respectively, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter: ‘TFEU’).
2006, s. I-289, bod 112.
For the purposes of this Decision references to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU should be understood as references to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty when appropriate.
Rozsudek ve věci Leipzig/Halle, bod 95.
The TFEU also introduced certain changes in terminology, such as the replacement of ‘Community’ by ‘Union’ and ‘common market’ by ‘internal market’.
Analogicky viz rovněž věc FENIN v.
The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this Decision.
Komise, C-205/03 P, Sb. rozh.
OJ C 216, 21.7.2012, p. 56.
2006, s. I-6295, bod 26.
Written question E-6470/08 of 2 December 2008 by Hiltrud Breyer (Verts/ALE) to the Commission regarding subsidisation of Zweibrücken airport by the Land Rhineland-Palatinate.
Viz zápis ze zasedání dozorčí rady společnosti FGAZ ze dne 2. října 2006, v němž se uvádí, že letiště dostává za poskytování služeb vojenským uživatelům odměnu.
Communication from the Commission — Guidelines on State aid to airports and airlines (OJ C 99, 4.4.2014, p. 3).
Věc SAT Fluggesellschaft v.
Application of Article 92 and 93 of the EC Treaty and Article 61 of the EEA Agreement to State aids in the Aviation Sector (OJ C 350, 10.12.1994, p. 5).
Eurocontrol, C-364/92, Recueil 1994, s. I-43.
Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (OJ C 312, 9.12.2005, p. 1).
Věc Komise v.
OJ C 113, 15.4.2014, p. 30.
Itálie, C-118/85, Recueil 1987, s. 2599, body 7 a 8 a věc Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées, C-30/87, Recueil 1988, s. 2479, bod 18.
Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used by the European Economic Community (OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385/58).
Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 19. března 2003 ve věci N309/02.
Commission Decision of 22 December 1993 — K (93) 3964/6 — KONVER I — and Commission Decision of 21 December 1995 — K (95) 3208 — KONVER II.
Viz zejména věc SAT Fluggesellschaft v.
For Rhineland-Palatine the conversion projects included the project ‘military airfield Zweibrücken’.
Eurocontrol, C-364/92, Recueil 1994, s. I-43, bod 30 a věc Selex Sistemi Integrati v.
Union financing reached EUR 9 million.
Komise, C-113/07 P, Sb. rozh.
http://www.flughafen-zweibruecken.de/de/wir-ueber-uns-de/daten-und-fakten-de.
2009, s. I-2207, bod 71.
All distances in road kilometres, based on the fastest route.
Viz mj. věc Wolfgang Heiser v.
Source:
Finanzamt Innsbruck, C-172/03, Sb. rozh.
maps.google.com, accessed 25 June 2014.
2005, s. I-01627, bod 36 a citovaná judikatura.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009, p. 56.
Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 20. února 2014 ve věci státní podpory SA.35847 (2012/N) – Česká republika – letiště Ostrava, dosud nezveřejněno v Úř. věst., 16. bod odůvodnění.
covered by the obligation of professional secrecy
Letiště Zweibrücken není uvedeno ve Vojenské letecké informační příručce pro Německo (MIL AIP Německo), jež obsahuje seznam všech vojenských letišť v Německu.
Joined Cases T-443/08 and T-455/08 Mitteldeutsche Flughafen AG and Flughafen Leipzig Halle GmbH v Commission (hereinafter: ‘Leipzig/Halle judgment’) [2011] ECR II-1311, in particular paragraphs 93-94;
Věc Francie v.
confirmed by case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v Commission [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:821.
Komise („Stardust Marine“), C-482/99, Recueil 2002, s. I-4397.
Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67).
Spojené věci Nord-Pas-de-Calais, T-267/08 a T-279/08, Sb. rozh.
Commission Decision 2012/21/EU of 20 December 2011 on the application of Article 106(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (OJ L 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3).
2011, ECLI:EU:T:2011:209, bod 108.
Commission Communication on a European Union framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (2011) (OJ C 8, 11.1.2012, p. 15).
Věc Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) a další v.
Communication from the Commission: Community Guidelines on State aid for Rescuing and Restructuring Firms in Difficulty (2004) (OJ C 244, 1.10.2004, p. 2).
La Poste a další, C-39/94, Recueil 1996, s. I-3547, bod 60 a věc Španělské království v.
Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates of 12 December 2007 (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6).
Komise Evropských společenství, C-342/96, Recueil 1999, s. I-2459, bod 41.
Commission Notice on the application of Article 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p. 10).
Věc Italská republika v.
Submitted as Annex 8 to Germany's submission of 27 January 2011.
Komise Evropských společenství, 173/73, Recueil 1974, s. 709, bod 13.
Prof. Dr Heuer und Prof. Dr Klophaus, unter Mitarbeit von Dr Berster and Wilken, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft — und Raumfahrt, Januar 2006, ‘Regionalökonomische Bedeutung und Perspektiven des Flugplatzes Zweibrücken’, S. 146;
Věc Francie v.
Desel Consulting und Airport Research Center GmbH, ‘Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025’, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH, September 2009, p. 85.
Komise („Stardust Marine“), C-482/99, Recueil 2002, s. I-4397, bod 69.
Airport Services Agreement between Ryanair and FZG of 22 September 2008, Section 3.
Věc Itálie v.
Oxera, ‘How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test?’ prepared for Ryanair, on 17 January 2014.
Komise („ALFA Romeo“), C-305/89, Recueil 1991, s. I-1603, bod 23;
Oxera, ‘How should AMS agreements be treated within the profitability analysis as part of the market economy operator test? — Practical application’ prepared for Ryanair, on 31 January 2014.
věc Alitalia v.
Case C-35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851;
Komise, T-296/97, Recueil 2000, s. II-3871, bod 84.
Case C-41/90 Höfner and Elser [1991] ECR I-1979;
Věc Belgie v.
Case C-244/94 Fédération Française des Sociétés d'Assurances v Ministère de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche [1995] ECR I-4013;
Komise, 40/85, Recueil 1986, s. I-2321.
Case C-55/96 Job Centre [1997] ECR I-7119.
Rozsudek ve věci Stardust Marine, bod 71.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599;
Věc Evropská komise v.
Case 35/96 Commission v Italy [1998] ECR I-3851.
Électricité de France (EDF), C-124/10P (dále jen „rozsudek ve věci EDF“), Sb. rozh.
Leipzig/Halle judgment, in particular paragraphs 93-94;
2012, ECLI:EU:C:2012:318, bod 85.
confirmed by case C-288/11 P Mitteldeutsche Flughafen and Flughafen Leipzig-Halle v Commission [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012:821;
Věc Het Vlaamse Gewest v.
Cases C-159/91 and C-160/91 Poucet v AGV and Pistre v Cancave [1993] ECR I-637.
Komise, T-214/95, Recueil 1998, s. II-717.
Leipzig-Halle judgment, paragraphs 42-43.
Mai 2003, Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Verkehr, Landwirtschaft und Weinbau, 15. května 2003.
Case C-170/83 Hydrotherm [1984] ECR I-2999, paragraph 11.
Einschätzung der rheinland-pfälzischen Innenministeriums, 15. května 2003.
See also case T-137/02 Pollmeier Malchow v Commission [2004] ECR II-3541, paragraph 50.
Věc Fleuren Compost v.
The joint exercise of an economic activity is normally assessed by analysing the existence of functional, economic and organic links between the entities.
Komise, T-109/01, Recueil 2004, s. II-127.
See for instance, case C-480/09 P AceaElectrabel Produzione SpA v Commission, [2010] ECR I-13355, paragraphs 47-55;
Úř. věst.
Case C-222/04 Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 112.
C 119, 22.5.2002, s. 22.
Case C-480/09 P Acea Electrabel Produzione SpA v Commission [2010] ECR I-13355, paragraphs 47-55;
Bod 173 pokynů pro leteckou dopravu z roku 2014.
Case C-222/04 Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA and Others [2006] ECR I-289, paragraph 112.
Bod 172 pokynů pro leteckou dopravu z roku 2014.
Leipzig/Halle judgment, paragraph 95.
Bod 25 písm. v) pokynů pro leteckou dopravu z roku 2014.
See also, by analogy, Case C-205/03 P FENIN v Commission [2006] ECR I-6295, paragraph 26.
Vyjádřeno jako hospodářský výsledek před úroky, zdaněním a odpisy (EBITDA).
See minutes of FGAZ's supervisory board of 2 October 2006, indicating that the airport is remunerated for offering services to military users.
Desel Consulting a Airport Research Center GmbH, „Fluggast- und Flugbewegungsprognose für den Flughafen Zweibrücken bis zum Jahr 2025“, Gutachten im Auftrag der Flughafen Zweibrücken GmbH , září 2009;
Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol [1994] ECR I-43.
Intraplan Consult GmbH, „Luftverkehrsprognose Flughafen Saarbrücken – Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse“, říjen 2010.
Case 118/85 Commission v Italy [1987] ECR 2599, paragraphs 7 and 8, and Case C-30/87 Bodson/Pompes funèbres des régions libérées [1988] ECR 2479, paragraph 18.
Rozhodnutí Komise ze dne 1. října 2014 o státní podpoře SA.26190 – Německo – letiště Saarbrücken, dosud nezveřejněno v Úř. věst.
Case C-343/95 Cali & Figli v Servizi ecologici porto di Genova [1997] ECR I-1547; Commission Decision N309/02 of 19 March 2003; Commission Decision N438/02 of 16 October 2002, Aid in support of the public authority functions in the Belgian port sector (OJ C 284, 21.11.2002).
Komise podotýká, že podle společnosti TUIFly bylo její rozhodnutí o odchodu z letiště Saarbrücken a přemístění se na letiště Zweibrücken motivováno bezpečnostními problémy v souvislosti s přistávací a vzletovou dráhou na letišti Saarbrücken.
Commission Decision N309/02 of 19 March 2003.
Německo na druhou stranu v rámci formálního vyšetřovacího řízení ve věci SA.26190 tvrdilo, že rozhodnutí leteckých společností o odchodu z letiště Saarbrücken nebyla nikdy zdůvodněna odkazem na infrastrukturu na letišti Saarbrücken.
See, in particular, Case C-364/92 SAT Fluggesellschaft v Eurocontrol [1994] ECR I-43, paragraph 30 and Case C-113/07 P Selex Sistemi Integrati v Commission [2009] ECR I-2207, paragraph 71.