natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Článek 31 vízového kodexu umožňuje členským státům vyžadovat, aby byly jejich ústřední orgány informovány o vízech, která udělily jiné členské státy státním příslušníkům určitých třetích zemí nebo určitým kategoriím takových státních příslušníků, s výjimkou letištních průjezdních víz.
Article 31 of the Visa Code allows a Member State to require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except in the case of airport transit visas.
Předávání těchto informací vyžaduje vytvoření nového formuláře v schengenské konzultační síti.
The transmission of such information requires the creation of a new form in the Schengen consultation network.
Ode dne použitelnosti vízového kodexu budou dlouhodobá víza platící současně jako víza krátkodobá (typ „D + C“) zrušena a průjezdní víza (typ „B“) splynou s krátkodobými vízy (typ „C“).
The long-stay visa, concurrently valid as a short-stay visa (type ‘D + C’), will be abolished and the transit visa (type ‘B’) will be merged with the short-stay visa (type ‘C’) from the date of application of the Visa Code.
Technické podmínky schengenské konzultační sítě by měly být odpovídajícím způsobem změněny a měly by se uplatňovat ode dne použitelnosti kodexu o vízech.
The technical specifications of the Schengen consultation network should be amended accordingly and should apply from the date of application of the Visa Code.
V souladu s články 1 a 2 Protokolu č. 22 o postavení Dánska, připojeného ke Smlouvě o Evropské unii a ke Smlouvě o fungování Evropské unie, se Dánsko neúčastní přijímání tohoto rozhodnutí a toto rozhodnutí pro ně není závazné ani použitelné.
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Vzhledem k tomu, že toto rozhodnutí navazuje na schengenské acquis, rozhodne se Dánsko v souladu s článkem 4 uvedeného protokolu do šesti měsíců ode poté, co Rada rozhodne o tomto rozhodnutí, zda je provede ve svém vnitrostátním právu.
Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Decision, whether it will implement it in its national law.
Pokud jde o Island a Norsko, rozvíjí toto rozhodnutí ta ustanovení schengenského acquis, ve smyslu Dohody uzavřené mezi Radou Evropské unie a Islandskou republikou a Norským královstvím o přidružení těchto dvou států k provádění, uplatňování a rozvoji schengenského acquis [3], která spadají do oblasti uvedené v čl. 1 bodě A rozhodnutí Rady 1999/437/ES ze dne 17. května 1999 o některých opatřeních pro uplatňování uvedené dohody [4].
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [3], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement [4].
Pokud jde o Švýcarsko, rozvíjí toto rozhodnutí ta ustanovení schengenského acquis ve smyslu Dohody mezi Evropskou unií, Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací o přidružení Švýcarské konfederace k provádění, uplatňování a rozvoji schengenského acquis [5], která spadají do oblasti uvedené v čl. 1 bodě A rozhodnutí Rady 1999/437/ES ve spojení s článkem 3 rozhodnutí Rady 2008/146/ES [6].
As regards Switzerland, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis [5], which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC [6] on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of that Agreement.
Pokud jde o Lichtenštejnsko, rozvíjí toto rozhodnutí ta ustanovení schengenského acquis ve smyslu Protokolu mezi Evropskou unií, Evropským společenstvím, Švýcarskou konfederací a Lichtenštejnským knížectvím o přistoupení Lichtenštejnského knížectví k Dohodě mezi Evropskou unií, Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací o přidružení Švýcarské konfederace k provádění, uplatňování a rozvoji schengenského acquis [7] která spadají do oblasti uvedené v čl. 1 bodě A rozhodnutí Rady 1999/437/ES ve spojení s článkem 3 rozhodnutí Rady 2008/261/ES [8].
As regards Liechtenstein, this Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis, within the meaning of the Protocol signed between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC, read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/261/EC [7] on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of that Protocol.
Toto rozhodnutí rozvíjí ta ustanovení schengenského acquis, kterých se neúčastní Spojené království v souladu s rozhodnutím Rady 2000/365/ES ze dne 29. května 2000 o žádosti Spojeného království Velké Británie a Severního Irska, aby se na ně vztahovala některá ustanovení schengenského acquis [9]. Spojené království se tedy nepodílí na jeho přijímání a toto rozhodnutí pro ně není závazné ani použitelné.
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [8]; the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.
Toto rozhodnutí rozvíjí ta ustanovení schengenského acquis, kterých se neúčastní Irsko v souladu s rozhodnutím Rady 2002/192/ES ze dne 28. února 2002 o žádosti Irska, aby se na ně vztahovala některá ustanovení schengenského acquis [10].
This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis [9].
Pokud jde o Kypr, představuje toto rozhodnutí akt navazující na schengenské acquis nebo s ním jinak související ve smyslu čl. 3 odst. 2 aktu o přistoupení z roku 2003.
As regards Cyprus, this Decision constitutes an act building upon the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.
Části 1, 2, 3 a 4 schengenské konzultační sítě (technické podmínky) se mění v souladu s přílohami I, II, III a IV.
Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) are hereby amended as set out in Annexes I, II, III and IV respectively.
Použije se ode dne 5. dubna 2010.
It shall apply from 5 April 2010.
Úř. věst. L 243, 15.9.2009, s. 1.
OJ L 243, 15.9.2009, p. 1.
Dokument Rady č. 16462/06; dostupný na http://register.consilium.europa.eu
OJ L 83, 26.3.2008, p. 3.
Úř. věst. L 83, 26.3.2008, s. 3
OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.
Úř. věst. L 131, 1.6.2000, s. 43. [10] Úř. věst. L 64, 7.3.2002, s. 20.
OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20.
Část 1 schengenské konzultační sítě (technické podmínky) se mění takto.
Part 1 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
V bodě 1.1.2 se zrušuje poslední odstavec.
in point 1.1.2., the last subparagraph shall be deleted;
V bodě 1.1.3 se první odstavec nahrazuje tímto:
in point 1.1.3., the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
„The application developed by each Member State reads delivery notifications from the inbox – on the basis of FORM R – and checks whether there is a corresponding delivery notification (FORM R) for every sent A, B, C, E, F, G or H form, which contained the “Document unifier”. The “Document unifier” is a unique context string – which identifies the mail – in the line beginning with the numbers “000”.“;
‘The application developed by each Member State reads delivery notifications from the inbox — on the basis of FORM R — and checks whether there is a corresponding delivery notification (FORM R) for every sent A, B, C, E, F, G or H form, which contained the “Document unifier”. The “Document unifier” is a unique context string — which identifies the mail — in the line beginning with the numbers “000”.’;
V bodě 1.3 se čtvrtý odstavec nahrazuje tímto:
in point 1.3., the fourth subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
„The “Subject” item of the message contains “file number” and a full stop (“.”) followed by the form-type identifier (Letter: “A”, “B”, “C”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H” or “R”).
‘The “Subject” item of the message contains “file number” and a full stop (“.”) followed by the form-type identifier (Letter: “A”, “B”, “C”, “E”, “F”, “G”, “H” or “R”).
Subject FRA2007022457471104.E“.
Subject FRA2007022457471104.E’.
Část 2 schengenské konzultační sítě (technické podmínky) se mění takto.
Part 2 of the Schengen consultation network (technical specifications) is amended as follows:
Bod 2.1.1 se nahrazuje tímto:
point 2.1.1 shall be replaced by the following: ‘The general process flow of documents may be described shortly as follows.
„The general process flow of documents may be described shortly as follows. Detailed information can be found in 3.1 „LIST OF FUNCTIONALITIES“.
Detailed information can be found in 3.1 “LIST OF FUNCTIONALITIES”.
FORM A „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION“
FORM A “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”
FORM B „REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST“
FORM B “REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
FORM C „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF VLTV“
FORM C “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF VLTV”
FORM F „VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION“
FORM F “VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM G „RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION“
FORM G “RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
FORM E „ERROR MESSAGE“
FORM E “ERROR MESSAGE”
FORM R „DELIVERY NOTIFICATION“
FORM R “DELIVERY NOTIFICATION”
FORM H „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA“
FORM H “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
For the sake of clarity, the notification of the delivery is not stated explicitly in the following flow samples.“
For the sake of clarity, the notification of the delivery is not stated explicitly in the following flow samples.’;
V bodě 2.1.1.1 se
in point 2.1.1.1, the following changes shall be introduced:
první odstavec nahrazuje tímto:
the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
„Four forms – A, B, C and H – are exchanged via the network.
‘Four forms – A, B, C and H – are exchanged via the network.
If the applicant has a nationality or belongs to a category of such a national for whom prior consultation is requested by a/some Member State(s) consultation of those States' central authority is required pursuant to Article 22 of the Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)třetí odstavec nahrazuje tímto:
If the applicant has a nationality or belongs to a category of such a national for whom prior consultation is requested by a/some Member State(s) consultation of those States' central authority is required pursuant to Article 22 of the Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code)the third subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
„If the consulting (requesting) authority issues a VLTV it notifies this to all Member States by sending C FORMs.“;
‘If the consulting (requesting) authority issues a VLTV it notifies this to all Member States by sending C FORMs.’;
pod tabulkou (obr. 2) se doplňuje nový odstavec, který zní:
below the table (Fig. 2), the following subparagraph shall be added:
„According to Article 31 of the Visa Code a Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except when an airport transit visa is issued. This information is transmitted by sending an H-FORM.“
‘According to Article 31 of the Visa Code a Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except when an airport transit visa is issued. This information is transmitted by sending an H-FORM.’;
Bod 2.1.1.2 se nahrazuje tímto:
point 2.1.1.2 shall be replaced by the following:
„If and only if a State intends to represent another State or to be represented by another State, the consultation procedure shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 8 of the Visa Code and in the representation arrangements concerned, as described in the below sample process pictures (pictures 1 and 2).
‘If and only if a State intends to represent another State or to be represented by another State, the consultation procedure shall meet the requirements referred to in Article 8 of the Visa Code and in the representation arrangements concerned, as described in the below sample process pictures (pictures 1 and 2).
Picture 1 -
Picture 1 —
Picture 2 -
Picture 2 —
The consultation procedure (7 calendar days) and any further communication between the represented State and representing State in relation to the decision process (e.g. exchange of forms F and G) has to be done within 15 calendar days in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Visa Code.“
The consultation procedure (7 calendar days) and any further communication between the represented State and representing State in relation to the decision process (e.g. exchange of forms F and G) has to be done within 15 calendar days in accordance with Article 23(1) of the Visa Code.’;
V bodě 2.1.2 se první odstavec nahrazuje tímto:
in point 2.1.2, the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
V bodě 2.1.4 se
in point 2.1.4, the following changes shall be introduced:
v tabulce položka 027 nahrazuje tímto:
in the table, heading ‘027’ shall be replaced by the following:
CZE (see 2.2.1)“;
CZE (see 2.2.1)’;
v tabulce položka 023 nahrazuje tímto:
heading ‘023’ shall be replaced by the following:
v tabulce položka 026 nahrazuje tímto:
heading ‘026’ shall be replaced by the following:
v tabulce zrušují položky 029, 030, 031 a 032;
headings 029, 030, 031 and 032 shall be deleted;
v tabulce doplňuje nová položka, která zní:
the following heading shall be added:
(*4) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.“;
(*4) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.’;
ve vysvětlivkách pod tabulkou
in the explanation, below the table, the following changes shall be introduced:
v tabulce položka 027 nahrazuje tímto:
heading ‘027’ shall be replaced by the following:
027: Main destination
‘Heading No. 027: Main destination
This refers to the Member State or Member States (max 3) of main destination where the visa applicant should stay.“;
This refers to the Member State or Member States (max 3) of main destination where the visa applicant should stay.’;
023: Border of entry
‘Heading No. 023: Border of entry
This refers to the applicant’s information about the State of first entry.“;
This refers to the applicant’s information about the State of first entry.’;
026: Type of visa
‘Heading No. 026: Type of visa
„C“ visas type is to be used.“;
“C” visas type is to be used.’;
099: Reference number of the application in the VIS format: alphanumblank (33)
‘Heading No. 099: Reference number of the application in the VIS format: alphanumblank (33)
The maximum total length has to be 33 characters.“
The maximum total length has to be 33 characters.’;
Bod 2.1.5 se nahrazuje tímto:
point 2.1.5 shall be replaced by the following:
FORM B: „REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST“
FORM B: “REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”
„2“
“2”
alphanumblank (33) CZE200907264365
alphanumblank (33)
Heading No.
CZE200907264365
000 & Heading No. 001:
Heading No. 000 & Heading No. 001:
See FORM A: „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION“. Heading No.
See FORM A: “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”.
040: Reply reference
Heading No. 040: Reply reference
16 free bytes for identification at national level. Heading No.
16 free bytes for identification at national level.
041: Reply
Heading No. 041: Reply
„1“ explicit approval within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
“1” explicit approval within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
„2“ refusal within the deadline of 7 calendar days. Heading No.
“2” refusal within the deadline of 7 calendar days.
042: Date of reply
Heading No. 042: Date of reply
This is the date the consulted central authority formulates its reply. Heading No.
This is the date the consulted central authority formulates its reply.
See FORM A: „CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION“.“
See FORM A: “CONSULTATION REQUEST REGARDING VISA APPLICATION”.’;
V bodě 2.1.6 se
in Point 2.1.6, the following changes shall be introduced:
v tabulce položka 045 nahrazuje tímto:
in the table, heading ‘045’ shall be replaced by the following:
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.“;
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.’;
(*5) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.“;
(*5) Mandatory if the Member State's reference number of the application is available in the VIS.’;
položka 045 nahrazuje tímto:
heading ‘045’ shall be replaced by the following:
„Heading No. 045: Visa number
‘Heading No. 045: Visa number
The total number of characters shall amount to 12položka nadepsaná „Heading No.000 & Heading No. 001 & Remaining headings“ nahrazuje tímto:
The total number of characters shall amount to 12‘Heading No. 000 & Heading No. 001 & Remaining headings’ shall be replaced by the following:
„Other headings:
‘Other headings:
V bodě 2.1.7 se
in point 2.1.7, the following changes shall be introduced:
ve vysvětlivkách pod tabulkou položka nadepsaná „Headings“ nahrazuje tímto:
in the explanation, below the table, ‘Headings’ shall be replaced by the following:
Bod 2.1.8 se nahrazuje tímto:
point 2.1.8 shall be replaced by the following:
FORM G: „RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION“
FORM G: “RESPONSE TO A VISA APPLICATION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF REPRESENTATION”
„5“
“5”
„5“ approval for LTV Heading No.
“5” approval for LTV
101: Comments
Heading No. 101: Comments
See FORM B: ‘REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST“.“
See FORM B: ‘REPLY TO CONSULTATION REQUEST”.’;
Bod 2.1.9 se nahrazuje tímto:
point 2.1.9 shall be replaced by the following:
FORM E: „ERROR MESSAGE“
FORM E: “ERROR MESSAGE”
047: Reference of error message
Heading No. 047: Reference of error message
16 bytes for the national identification number Heading No.
16 bytes for the national identification number
048: Document reference (erroneous form)
Heading No. 048: Document reference (erroneous form)
„Reference number of request“, (heading 001 of a referred „A“ or „F“).
“Reference number of request”, (heading 001 of a referred “A” or “F”).
„Reference number of reply“, (heading 040 of a referred „B“ or „G“).
“Reference number of reply”, (heading 040 of a referred “B” or “G”).
„Reference of the decision“, (heading 044 of a referred „C“ or „H“). Heading No.
“Reference of the decision”, (heading 044 of a referred “C” or “H”).
049: Type of form
Heading No. 049: Type of form
„A“, „B“, „C“, „F“, „G“ or „H“. Heading No.
“A”, “B”, “C”, “F”, “G” or “H”.
050: Type of error
Heading No. 050: Type of error
„1“ technical error
“1” technical error
„2“ logical error Heading No.
“2” logical error
051: Reason for the technical error
Heading No. 051: Reason for the technical error
If error code 1 appears under heading No. 050, the number of the heading of the document which contains the first error must compulsorily be entered under heading No. 051. Heading No.
If error code 1 appears under heading No. 050, the number of the heading of the document which contains the first error must compulsorily be entered under heading No. 051.
052: Reason for the logical error
Heading No. 052: Reason for the logical error
„01“ Reply received too late
“01” Reply received too late
„02“ No consultation/information required
“02” No consultation/information required
„03“ Reply was not taken into account since visa of limited territorial validity has been issued in the meantime
“03” Reply was not taken into account since visa of limited territorial validity has been issued in the meantime
„04“ Form received in duplicate
“04” Form received in duplicate
„05“ Unknown which form was received
“05” Unknown which form was received
The national applications shall be adapted in such a way that the statistics generated on Form E enable distinction of the number of error messages caused by technical errors (code = „1“ under Heading No. 050) and logical errors (code = „2“ under Heading No. 050).
The national applications shall be adapted in such a way that the statistics generated on Form E enable distinction of the number of error messages caused by technical errors (code = “1” under Heading No. 050) and logical errors (code = “2” under Heading No. 050).
It is prohibited to scan a form E itself for logical or technical failures and to reply to a malformed E by another form E to prevent a cumulative process – „Snowball Effect“.“
It is prohibited to scan a form E itself for logical or technical failures and to reply to a malformed E by another form E to prevent a cumulative process – “Snowball Effect”.’;
V bodě 2.1.10 pod nadpisem „Additional rules for form R“ se druhý podbod nahrazuje tímto:
In point 2.1.10. under ‘Additional rules for form R’, the second bullet point shall be replaced by the following:
„If a Member State receives an alleged erroneous form R, it has to discard this form R without processing it. This means that the Member State should ignore forms R that seem to be invalid. Consequently an application which had to discard potentially malformed forms R will have remaining, unacknowledged forms A,…, H which will have to be resent until a valid form R arrives. If the problem persists it has to be solved bilaterally by technical staff.“
‘If a Member State receives an alleged erroneous form R, it has to discard this form R without processing it. This means that the Member State should ignore forms R that seem to be invalid. Consequently an application which had to discard potentially malformed forms R will have remaining, unacknowledged forms A,…, H which will have to be resent until a valid form R arrives. If the problem persists it has to be solved bilaterally by technical staff.’;
Vkládá se nový bod, který zní:
After point 2.1.10, the following point shall be added:
FORM H: „NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA“
FORM H: “NOTIFICATION OF ISSUE OF A VISA”
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code „D“ for Germany.
Exception for Germany: ICAO document 9303 on machine-readable travel documents provides the country code “D” for Germany.