natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Charles Tannock, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam a Vytautas Landsbergis za skupinu PPE-DE
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Árpád Duka‑Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam and Vytautas Landsbergis, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Georgs Andrejevs a Henrik Lax za skupinu ALDE
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs and Henrik Lax, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Adam Jerzy Bielan, Inese Vaidere, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis a Guntars Krasts za skupinu UEN
– Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Adam Jerzy Bielan, Inese Vaidere, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis and Guntars Krasts, on behalf of the UEN Group
o on the situation in South Ossetia
on the situation in South Ossetia
Usnesení Evropského parlamentu o on the situation in South Ossetia
European Parliament resolution on the situation in South Ossetia
having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia, in particular that of 14 October 2004,
having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia, in particular that of 14 October 2004,
having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy,
having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy,
having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 26 February 2004 on EU policy towards the South Caucasus and to its report of May 2005 on EU-Russia relations,
having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 26 February 2004 on EU policy towards the South Caucasus and to its report of May 2005 on EU-Russia relations,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, which entered into force in 1999,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, which entered into force in 1999,
having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council meeting of 16-17 October 2006,
having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council meeting of 16-17 October 2006,
whereas the situation in South Ossetia is deteriorating, with incidents, shootouts and clashes between Georgian and Ossetian forces and police units in recent months causing deaths and injuries,
whereas the situation in South Ossetia is deteriorating, with incidents, shootouts and clashes between Georgian and Ossetian forces and police units in recent months causing deaths and injuries,
whereas the Government and Parliament of Georgia have questioned the existing format of the negotiating process, the composition of the peacekeeping forces and the mechanisms of the peacekeeping operations stemming from the ceasefire agreement of 1992,
whereas the Government and Parliament of Georgia have questioned the existing format of the negotiating process, the composition of the peacekeeping forces and the mechanisms of the peacekeeping operations stemming from the ceasefire agreement of 1992,
whereas the two sides have put forward two separate peace plans which contain many common elements that could and should be used as a basis for fruitful negotiations; whereas the Joint Control Commission (JCC) has lately proved incapable of producing significant results,
whereas the two sides have put forward two separate peace plans which contain many common elements that could and should be used as a basis for fruitful negotiations; whereas the Joint Control Commission (JCC) has lately proved incapable of producing significant results,
whereas the Russian Federation, by issuing passports to the residents of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is complicating the process of peaceful conflict resolution in the conflict zones in Georgia,
whereas the Russian Federation, by issuing passports to the residents of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is complicating the process of peaceful conflict resolution in the conflict zones in Georgia,
having regard to the decision by the South Ossetian leadership to hold a referendum on self‑determination together with the presidential election on 12 November 2006,
having regard to the decision by the South Ossetian leadership to hold a referendum on self‑determination together with the presidential election on 12 November 2006,
whereas Georgia has moved to the stage of ‘intensified dialogue’ with NATO with a view to becoming a full member of that organisation,
whereas Georgia has moved to the stage of ‘intensified dialogue’ with NATO with a view to becoming a full member of that organisation,
deeply worried at the diplomatic crisis between Georgia and Russia following the recent arrests of four officers from Russia’s military intelligence service (GRU) by the Georgian counterintelligence services on allegations of espionage and the subsequent recall of the Russian ambassador to Moscow for consultations,
deeply worried at the diplomatic crisis between Georgia and Russia following the recent arrests of four officers from Russia’s military intelligence service (GRU) by the Georgian counterintelligence services on allegations of espionage and the subsequent recall of the Russian ambassador to Moscow for consultations,
whereas on 2 October 2006 the Russian authorities interrupted all land, air and sea links with Georgia, including mail communications, although the four officers had been released to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and are now back in Russia,
whereas on 2 October 2006 the Russian authorities interrupted all land, air and sea links with Georgia, including mail communications, although the four officers had been released to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and are now back in Russia,
whereas a number of seriously discriminatory measures have been taken by the Russian authorities against Georgians living in Russia on the grounds of their ethnicity, including the deportation of nearly 700 Georgians from Moscow to Tbilisi and the alleged harassment of Georgian worshippers, businessmen and schoolchildren under the pretext of a clampdown on organised crime and illegal immigrants,
whereas a number of seriously discriminatory measures have been taken by the Russian authorities against Georgians living in Russia on the grounds of their ethnicity, including the deportation of nearly 700 Georgians from Moscow to Tbilisi and the alleged harassment of Georgian worshippers, businessmen and schoolchildren under the pretext of a clampdown on organised crime and illegal immigrants,
whereas in early 2006 the Russian Federation imposed a ban on the import of agricultural products (wine, fruit and vegetables) from Moldova and Georgia, which is considerably harming the economic development of both countries,
whereas in early 2006 the Russian Federation imposed a ban on the import of agricultural products (wine, fruit and vegetables) from Moldova and Georgia, which is considerably harming the economic development of both countries,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia,
whereas the EU must increase its support for the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflicts in Georgia and the South Caucasus region, in cooperation with the OSCE and other actors,
whereas the EU must increase its support for the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflicts in Georgia and the South Caucasus region, in cooperation with the OSCE and other actors,
Reiterates its call for a peaceful resolution of the conflict and its commitment to support the peace process, and calls on all parties to act responsibly by refraining from unilateral steps and inflammatory and aggressive statements which serve to exacerbate the situation and may degenerate into violence;
Reiterates its call for a peaceful resolution of the conflict and its commitment to support the peace process, and calls on all parties to act responsibly by refraining from unilateral steps and inflammatory and aggressive statements which serve to exacerbate the situation and may degenerate into violence;
Reaffirms its full support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia and calls on the Russian authorities to fully respect the sovereignty of that country within its internationally recognised borders;
Reaffirms its full support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia and calls on the Russian authorities to fully respect the sovereignty of that country within its internationally recognised borders;
Strongly condemns the attempts by movements in the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia to establish independence unilaterally;
Strongly condemns the attempts by movements in the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia to establish independence unilaterally;
Calls on the Government of the Russian Federation to withhold support from all of these movements and to give its fullest support to the multilateral efforts to find a solution to the conflicts in its neighbourhood;
Calls on the Government of the Russian Federation to withhold support from all of these movements and to give its fullest support to the multilateral efforts to find a solution to the conflicts in its neighbourhood;
Condemns the fact that South Ossetia will hold a referendum on independence on 12 November 2006, and reminds the parties that a similar referendum on independence in 1992 was not internationally recognised;
Condemns the fact that South Ossetia will hold a referendum on independence on 12 November 2006, and reminds the parties that a similar referendum on independence in 1992 was not internationally recognised;
Notes that the stagnated peace process needs to be relaunched, and calls for an enhanced and combined effort by the European Union and the OSCE to bring the parties back to the negotiating table, based on the progress made in the initial stages of the two peace plans;
Notes that the stagnated peace process needs to be relaunched, and calls for an enhanced and combined effort by the European Union and the OSCE to bring the parties back to the negotiating table, based on the progress made in the initial stages of the two peace plans;
Calls, in that connection, on both parties to sign the joint document on refraining from the use of force and on security guarantees and to engage in constructive negotiations in order to overcome the present stalemate; regrets the fact that the meeting of the Joint Control Commission which took place in Vladikavkaz on 12-13 October 2006 did not yield any results;
Calls, in that connection, on both parties to sign the joint document on refraining from the use of force and on security guarantees and to engage in constructive negotiations in order to overcome the present stalemate; regrets the fact that the meeting of the Joint Control Commission which took place in Vladikavkaz on 12-13 October 2006 did not yield any results;
Takes the view that the full demilitarisation of and a reduction in the number of weapons in the conflict area, with the exception of the OSCE joint peacekeeping force, is a fundamental element of conflict prevention and a first essential step towards further confidence-building measures;
Takes the view that the full demilitarisation of and a reduction in the number of weapons in the conflict area, with the exception of the OSCE joint peacekeeping force, is a fundamental element of conflict prevention and a first essential step towards further confidence-building measures;
Stresses that neutral, effective and impartial peacekeeping operations are essential for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia; looks with interest, in that connection, to new proposals concerning the existing tripartite joint peacekeeping force deployed in the conflict area around the ceasefire line between Georgia and South Ossetia; points out that a new force should incorporate an element of police support, to combat crime and lawlessness; underlines that the EU should be prepared, if necessary, to commit troops to a new peacekeeping force;
Stresses that neutral, effective and impartial peacekeeping operations are essential for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia; looks with interest, in that connection, to new proposals concerning the existing tripartite joint peacekeeping force deployed in the conflict area around the ceasefire line between Georgia and South Ossetia; points out that a new force should incorporate an element of police support, to combat crime and lawlessness; underlines that the EU should be prepared, if necessary, to commit troops to a new peacekeeping force;
Considers it unfair and discriminatory that South Ossetian citizens holding Russian passports can travel to the EU more easily than Georgians, a state of affairs which contributes to increased tensions over the South Ossetian region and acts as a disincentive to a settlement of the dispute;
Considers it unfair and discriminatory that South Ossetian citizens holding Russian passports can travel to the EU more easily than Georgians, a state of affairs which contributes to increased tensions over the South Ossetian region and acts as a disincentive to a settlement of the dispute;
Calls on the Russian authorities to rescind all the measures recently taken against Georgia and against the Georgian population on its territory; calls, further, on the Russian authorities to lift their unjustified import ban on products from Moldova and Georgia;
Calls on the Russian authorities to rescind all the measures recently taken against Georgia and against the Georgian population on its territory; calls, further, on the Russian authorities to lift their unjustified import ban on products from Moldova and Georgia;
Calls on the Council to keep on making every effort to defuse the tension and rebuild confidence between Georgia and the Russian Federation and prevent the present diplomatic crisis from escalating further; urges the Council and the Commission to find ways to help Georgia overcome and counterbalance the economic and social repercussions of the measures taken in Moscow;
Calls on the Council to keep on making every effort to defuse the tension and rebuild confidence between Georgia and the Russian Federation and prevent the present diplomatic crisis from escalating further; urges the Council and the Commission to find ways to help Georgia overcome and counterbalance the economic and social repercussions of the measures taken in Moscow;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to include the question of frozen conflicts and their resolution on the agenda for the next EU-Russia summits;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to include the question of frozen conflicts and their resolution on the agenda for the next EU-Russia summits;
Welcomes the conclusion and the signing of the ENP Action Plan for Georgia; expects that its implementation will give a further boost to the political and reform process in that country; welcomes the statements by the High Representative for the CFSP Javier Solana, who recently said that the EU intends to become more actively engaged in the resolution of conflicts in Georgia, and calls on the Council to provide the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus with all the necessary means and resources to make this action more effective and visible;
Welcomes the conclusion and the signing of the ENP Action Plan for Georgia; expects that its implementation will give a further boost to the political and reform process in that country; welcomes the statements by the High Representative for the CFSP Javier Solana, who recently said that the EU intends to become more actively engaged in the resolution of conflicts in Georgia, and calls on the Council to provide the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus with all the necessary means and resources to make this action more effective and visible;
pověřuje svého předsedu, aby předal toto usnesení to the Council and Commission, the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the OSCE, the President and Parliament of Georgia, the President and Parliament of the Russian Federation and the de facto authorities in South Ossetia.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the OSCE, the President and Parliament of Georgia, the President and Parliament of the Russian Federation and the de facto authorities in South Ossetia.
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam a Vytautas Landsbergis za skupinu PPE-DE
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam and Vytautas Landsbergis, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jelko Kacin, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs a Henrik Lax za skupinu ALDE
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jelko Kacin, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs and Henrik Lax, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Helmuth Markov za skupinu GUE/NGL
– Helmuth Markov, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
– Adam Jerzy Bielan, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk a Janusz Wojciechowski za skupinu UEN
– Adam Jerzy Bielan, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk and Janusz Wojciechowski, on behalf of the UEN Group
o Moldavsku (Podněstří)
on Moldova (Transnistria)
s ohledem na svá předchozí usnesení o situaci v Moldavsku a situaci v Podněstří, a zejména na své usnesení ze dne 16. března 2006,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Moldova and the situation in Transnistria, and in particular that of 16 March 2006,
s ohledem na Dohodu o partnerství a spolupráci mezi Moldavskem a Evropskou unií, která vstoupila v platnost dne 1. července 1998,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between Moldova and the European Union, which entered into force on 1 July 1998,
s ohledem na akční plán pro Moldavsko v rámci evropské politiky sousedství, který určuje směr strategické spolupráce mezi Moldavskou republikou a Evropskou unií a který byl přijat dne 22. února 2006,
having regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan for Moldova, which sets the direction for strategic cooperation between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, adopted on 22 February 2006,
s ohledem na prohlášení Organizace pro bezpečnost a spolupráci v Evropě (OBSE) na summitu v Istanbulu v roce 1999 a na jednání ministerské rady OBSE v Oportu v roce 2002,
having regard to the statements of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) at the 1999 Summit in Istanbul and the 2002 Ministerial Council meeting in Oporto,
s ohledem na ukrajinskou iniciativu „K řešení pomocí demokracie“, kterou zahájil ukrajinský prezident Viktor Juščenko v dubnu 2005,
having regard to the Ukrainian initiative 'Towards a Resolution through Democracy', launched by the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, in April 2005,
s ohledem na prohlášení předsednictví ze dne 18. září 2006 o „referendu“ v podněsterské oblasti Moldavské republiky,
having regard to the Presidency statement of 18 September 2006 on the 'referendum' in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova,
vzhledem k tomu, že se dne 17. září 2006 v moldavské oblasti Podněstří konalo „referendum“ usilující o naprostou nezávislost této oblasti a o její případné sjednocení s Ruskou federací,
whereas a 'referendum' took place in the Moldovan region of Transnistria on 17 September 2006, aimed at full independence for the region and its possible unification with the Russian Federation,
vzhledem k tomu, že mezinárodní společenství toto „referendum“ ani jeho výsledek neuznalo, neboť referendum bylo organizováno represivním režimem Podněstří zcela jednostranně, čímž bylo zamezeno možnosti vyjednání politického řešení konfliktu v Moldavsku, a také proto, že sugestivní ráz otázek a neschopnost splnit základní požadavky pro svobodné a nestranné volby, jako je svoboda sdělovacích prostředků, svoboda shromažďování a politický pluralismus, zřejmě předurčily výsledek referenda,
whereas neither this 'referendum' nor its outcome were accepted by the international community, as it was organised in a completely unilateral manner by the repressive regime of Transnistria, thus blocking the possibilities for a negotiated political solution to the conflict in Moldova, and as the suggestive character of the questions and the failure to meet basic requirements for free and fair elections such as freedom of the media, freedom of assembly and political pluralism were considered as predetermining the outcome of the referendum,
vzhledem k tomu, že konflikt mezi separatistickými podněsterskými orgány a ústřední vládou Moldavska významně přispěl k nestabilitě v celé zemi,
whereas the conflict between the separatist authority of Transnistria and the central government in Moldova has largely contributed to the instability in the whole country,
vzhledem k tomu, že jednání o statusu Podněstří probíhají od roku 1992, v tzv. sestavě „pět plus dva“, které se účastní Moldavsko, moldavská podněsterská oblast, Rusko, Ukrajina a OBSE a v roli pozorovatelů EU a USA; vzhledem k tomu, že tato jednání v dubnu 2006 selhala,
whereas negotiations concerning the status of Transnistria have been ongoing since 1992, in the so called 'Five-Plus-Two Format', in which Moldova, the Transnistrian region of Moldova, Russia, Ukraine and the OSCE are participating, with the EU and the USA as observers; whereas in April 2006 the negotiations broke down,
vzhledem k tomu, že Evropská unie v nedávné době podnikla významné kroky k posílení své angažovanosti vůči Moldavské republice a k prohloubení úsilí o řešení konfliktu v Podněstří zřízením stálé delegace Evropské komise v Kišiněvě, jmenováním zvláštního zástupce EU (EUSR) pro Moldavsko s mandátem přispívat k trvalému řešení konfliktu v Podněstří a zřízením mise EU pro pomoc na hranicích (EUBAM) pro Moldavsko a Ukrajinu,
whereas the European Union took important steps recently to enhance its engagement with the Republic of Moldova and the search for a resolution of the Transnistrian conflict, by opening a permanent European Commission delegation in Chisinau, appointing an EU Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova with a mandate to contribute to a sustainable settlement of the Transnistrian conflict and establishing an EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Moldova and Ukraine,
vzhledem k tomu, že podle zprávy OSN o lidském rozvoji z roku 2005 je Moldavsko nejchudší zemí Evropy a situace v Podněstří je závažnou překážkou socioekonomického rozvoje země,
whereas, according to the UN's 2005 Human Development Report, Moldova is the poorest country in Europe and the situation with regard to Transnistria is a major hindrance to the country's socio-economic development,
vzhledem k tomu, že Ruská federace zavedla na začátku letošního roku zákaz dovozu zemědělských produktů (vína, ovoce a zeleniny) z Moldavska a Gruzie, který působí hospodářskému rozvoji obou zemí značné škody,
whereas at the beginning of this year the Russian Federation imposed a ban on the import of agricultural products (wine, fruit and vegetables) from Moldova and Georgia, which is particularly harmful to the economic development of both countries,