natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(4) V zájmu doplnění ustanovení nařízení Komise č. 1400/2002, pokud jde o možnost výrobce umisťovat čitelně a účinně svou obchodní značku nebo logo na součásti nebo náhradní díly, členské státy zajistí, aby byli zákazníci řádně informováni o původu náhradních dílů, například pomocí informací o obchodních značkách nebo logách umístěných na dotčených dílech.
(4) Whereas to complement the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 concerning the ability of a manufacturer to place its trade mark or logo on components or spare parts visibly and in an effective manner , Member States shall ensure that consumers are duly informed about the origin of spare parts, such as information about trade marks or logos placed on the parts concerned,
(4) V zájmu doplnění ustanovení nařízení Komise č. 1400/2002, pokud jde o možnost výrobce umisťovat čitelně a účinně svou obchodní značku nebo logo na součásti nebo náhradní díly , musí být zajištěno, aby byli zákazníci řádně informováni o původu náhradních dílů, například pomocí informací o obchodních značkách nebo logách umístěných na dotčených dílech.
(4) Whereas to complement the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 concerning the ability of a manufacturer to place its trade mark or logo on components or spare parts visibly and in an effective manner , it must be ensured that consumers are duly informed about the origin of spare parts, such as by inform a tion about trade marks or logos placed on the parts concerned,
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 4A (nový)
Recital 4 A (new)
(4a) Tato směrnice by měla vstoupit v platnost nezávisle na probíhajících studiích a na případných dalších posouzeních dopadů.
(4a) This directive should become effective independently of ongoing studies and possible impact assessments,
(Průmyslový) vzor požívá ochrany, pokud je použit pouze pro účely dekorace a vzhledu, tj. nikoli pro účely opravy tohoto výrobku s cílem obnovit jeho původní vzhled, nýbrž s cílem změnit jej.
Protection of design shall exist if a design is applied for decorative and appearance reasons only, i.e. not to repair this product in order to restore, but rather change its original appearance.
Komise sleduje uplatňování této směrnice zejména s ohledem na její dopad na cenu a bezpečnost náhradních dílů, na podmínky, které pojišťovny kladou na své pojištěnce, a na vliv nového opatření na podmínky hospodářské soutěže.
The Commission shall monitor the implementation of this Directive, especially as regards its impact on the prices and safety of spare parts, the terms which insurance companies impose on insured persons, and the effects of the new regulatory regime on the conditions of competition.
Pravidelně předkládá Radě a Evropskému parlamentu zprávu, která obsahuje výsledky tohoto sledování a dále návrhy opatření, která je třeba v souladu s cíli Evropské unie přijmout.
At periodic intervals it shall submit a report to the Council and the European Parliament setting out its findings and proposing appropriate measures consistent with Union objectives.
Stanoví pravidelné posouzení míry dopadu regulačního režimu se zvláštním ohledem na nejcitlivější skutečnosti.
Provides for regular assessment to gauge the impact of the regulatory regime, with particular reference to the most sensitive matters.
Členské státy zajistí, aby spotřebitelé byli řádně informováni o původu náhradních dílů, aby si mohli mezi konkurenčními náhradními díly vybrat se znalostí věci.
Member States shall ensure that consumers are duly informed about the origin of spare parts so that they can make an informed choice between competing spare parts.
Odstavec 1 platí v případě, že jsou spotřebitelé řádně informováni o původu náhradních dílů použitých na opravu, a to pomocí označení, jako jsou např. obchodní značky či obchodní název nebo jinou vhodnou formou, aby si mohli mezi konkurenčními náhradními díly vybrat se znalostí věci.
Paragraph 1 shall apply provided that consumers are duly informed about the origin of the product used for the repair by the use of a marking, such as a trade mark or a trade name, or in another appr o priate form so that they can make an informed choice between competing products offered for repair.
Spotřebitelé, opravny a obchodníci se součástkami by v žádném případě neměli být zatíženi dalšími poplatky či licencí nebo zpoplatněním za používání náhradních dílů za účelem opravy.
Consumers, garages, and parts distributors should not, under any circumstances, be required to pay any additional charge, licence fee, or consideration for the use of spare parts for repair purposes.
Prodejní cena automobilu již v sobě zahrnuje náklady vzniklé v souvislosti s vytvořením (průmyslového) vzoru modelu, tyto náklady jsou tedy plně zaplaceny při nákupu vozidla.
The selling price of a car already includes the costs incurred in designing the model, which are consequently paid in full when the car is bought.
Při opravě by se již neměla požadovat žádná úhrada nákladů spojených s vývojem vzoru.
When the car is repaired, no one should be made to pay the design costs again.
Jelikož uvedené náklady byly již plně hrazeny při nákupu vozidla, neexistuje žádný důvod pro dvojí nebo vícenásobné zpoplatnění vzoru.
Given that it has already been paid for at the time of purchase of the car, there is no reason to charge for design twice or several times over.
Ba právě naopak – to by ovlivnilo nepříznivě malé a střední podniky a bránilo by to růstu.
On the contrary, this would adversely affect small and medium-sized businesses and inhibit growth.
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 98/71/ES o právní ochraně (průmyslových) vzorů
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs
ECON 14.12.2004
ECON 30.11.2004
Wolf Klinz 30.11.2004
Wolf Klinz 14.12.2004
k návrhu směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 98/71/ES o právní ochraně (průmyslových) vzorů
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs
(*) Užší spolupráce mezi výbory – článek 47 jednacího řádu.
(*) Enhanced cooperation between committees – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure’.
As a preliminary remark, you rapporteur would point out that the sole reason for this legislation is to the resolve the sole issue remaining after the adoption of Directive 98/71.
As a preliminary remark, you rapporteur would point out that the sole reason for this legislation is to the resolve the sole issue remaining after the adoption of Directive 98/71.
As many members of this committee will recall, the compromise reached in the codecision procedure between Parliament and Council, with the aid of the Commission, primarily concerned Article 14, relating to the "repairs clause", i.e. the conditions subject to which garages and workshops carrying out repairs must use spare parts supplied by the manufacturer or may use spare parts manufactured by third parties.
As many members of this committee will recall, the compromise reached in the codecision procedure between Parliament and Council, with the aid of the Commission, primarily concerned Article 14, relating to the "repairs clause", i.e. the conditions subject to which garages and workshops carrying out repairs must use spare parts supplied by the manufacturer or may use spare parts manufactured by third parties.
The solution which the negotiators worked out was to have a "standstill plus", i.e. to freeze the existing legislative situation in each Member State while also allowing any State to liberalise the market further.
The solution which the negotiators worked out was to have a "standstill plus", i.e. to freeze the existing legislative situation in each Member State while also allowing any State to liberalise the market further.
No obstacle was to be allowed to the free movement of the parts in question.
No obstacle was to be allowed to the free movement of the parts in question.
The Council abandoned its position of seeking to allow a "free-for-all", i.e. allowing the Member States carte blanche to introduce or change national legal provisions in this area.
The Council abandoned its position of seeking to allow a "free-for-all", i.e. allowing the Member States carte blanche to introduce or change national legal provisions in this area.
Parliament made concessions on its preference for a totally harmonised system of fair and reasonable remuneration for right holders for any use of the design of a component part used in the repair of a complex product.
Parliament made concessions on its preference for a totally harmonised system of fair and reasonable remuneration for right holders for any use of the design of a component part used in the repair of a complex product.
The other point at issue was the method to be used by the Commission to assess the consequences of the Directive after its entry into force (Article 18).
The other point at issue was the method to be used by the Commission to assess the consequences of the Directive after its entry into force (Article 18).
Parliament wished to have a provision included in the text requiring the Commission to consult manufacturers of original parts and spare parts, with the aim of arriving at a voluntary agreement between the parties on a system of fair and reasonable remuneration.
Parliament wished to have a provision included in the text requiring the Commission to consult manufacturers of original parts and spare parts, with the aim of arriving at a voluntary agreement between the parties on a system of fair and reasonable remuneration.
In the event, Parliament accepted the Council's request that this provision should not be incorporated into the text after receiving assurances from the competent Commissioner that the following declaration would be printed together with the Directive in the Official Journal :
In the event, Parliament accepted the Council's request that this provision should not be incorporated into the text after receiving assurances from the competent Commissioner that the following declaration would be printed together with the Directive in the Official Journal :
The aim of this consultation will be to arrive at a voluntary agreement between the parties involved on the protection of designs in cases where the product incorporating the design or to which the design is applied constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design is dependent.
The aim of this consultation will be to arrive at a voluntary agreement between the parties involved on the protection of designs in cases where the product incorporating the design or to which the design is applied constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design is dependent.
The Commission will coordinate the consultation exercise and will report regularly to the Parliament and the Council on its progress.
The Commission will coordinate the consultation exercise and will report regularly to the Parliament and the Council on its progress.
The consulted parties will be invited by the Commission to consider a range of possible options on which to base a voluntary agreement, including a remuneration system and a system based on a limited period of design protection."
The consulted parties will be invited by the Commission to consider a range of possible options on which to base a voluntary agreement, including a remuneration system and a system based on a limited period of design protection."
When it proved impossible to reach a voluntary agreement, the Commission ordered a study to be carried out into the possible options for harmonising the aftermarket in spare parts.
When it proved impossible to reach a voluntary agreement, the Commission ordered a study to be carried out into the possible options for harmonising the aftermarket in spare parts.
The study focused on the automotive sector, reflecting the importance of the economic impact in this sector.
The study focused on the automotive sector, reflecting the importance of the economic impact in this sector.
On the basis of an extended impact assessment the Commission came to the conclusion that "the option to exclude design protection in the aftermarket for spare parts is the only effective one to achieve an internal market.
On the basis of an extended impact assessment the Commission came to the conclusion that "the option to exclude design protection in the aftermarket for spare parts is the only effective one to achieve an internal market.
Liberalisation promises benefits in many respects without serious drawbacks.
Liberalisation promises benefits in many respects without serious drawbacks.
Your draftsman considers that the Commission's proposal should be endorsed for the following reasons relating to the sound functioning of the internal market and to the economic welfare of consumers:
Your draftsman considers that the Commission's proposal should be endorsed for the following reasons relating to the sound functioning of the internal market and to the economic welfare of consumers:
First, from the point of view of the internal market , there is a single market for new cars but no single market for car spare parts.
First, from the point of view of the internal market , there is a single market for new cars but no single market for car spare parts.
This means that automotive spare parts cannot be freely produced and traded within the Community.
This means that automotive spare parts cannot be freely produced and traded within the Community.
As a result of this fragmentation and the uncertainty about how the Community’s design regime will evolve, citizens cannot be certain whether or not the purchase of certain spare parts is lawful.
As a result of this fragmentation and the uncertainty about how the Community’s design regime will evolve, citizens cannot be certain whether or not the purchase of certain spare parts is lawful.
In parts of the Community consumers are not free to choose between competing spare parts.
In parts of the Community consumers are not free to choose between competing spare parts.
For the same reason, parts manufacturers, especially SMEs, cannot use the economies of scale offered by a single market and they are discouraged from generating investment and employment which they might otherwise do.
For the same reason, parts manufacturers, especially SMEs, cannot use the economies of scale offered by a single market and they are discouraged from generating investment and employment which they might otherwise do.
Secondly, the "must fit/must match" requirement means there is no need for intellectual property protection since no creativity is involved.
Secondly, the "must fit/must match" requirement means there is no need for intellectual property protection since no creativity is involved.
That requirement also means that consumer safety will not be jeopardised.
That requirement also means that consumer safety will not be jeopardised.
Thirdly, the regime proposed will boost competition and this will have a positive spin off for consumers in terms of price competition and keeping insurance costs down.
Thirdly, the regime proposed will boost competition and this will have a positive spin off for consumers in terms of price competition and keeping insurance costs down.
Lastly, deregulation will allow SMEs to have a greater share of the aftermarket for spare parts and there is no evidence that the result will be the importation of vast amounts of spare parts now produced in the Community.
Lastly, deregulation will allow SMEs to have a greater share of the aftermarket for spare parts and there is no evidence that the result will be the importation of vast amounts of spare parts now produced in the Community.
It is well known that multinationals already produce a multiplicity of parts such as car bumpers, in low-cost countries.
It is well known that multinationals already produce a multiplicity of parts such as car bumpers, in low-cost countries.
Výbor pro vnitřní trh a ochranu spotřebitelů vyzývá Výbor pro právní záležitosti, se kterým pracuje v rámci postupu užší spolupráce stanoveného článkem 47 jednacího řádu, aby návrh směrnice, k němuž byl přidán nový bod odůvodnění 1a, schválil.
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, with which it is working under the enhanced cooperation procedure provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure, to endorse the proposal for a directive, with the addition of a new recital 1 a.
(1a) vzhledem k tomu, že zrušení ochrany vzorů je v rozporu s mezinárodně uznávanými zásadami ochrany duševního vlastnictví a představovalo by nebezpečný precedens pro ochranu práv duševního vlastnictví také v jiných odvětvích, zatímco se Evropská unie zavázala, zejména v rámci WTO, že bude naléhat na přijetí režimu na ochranu práv duševního vlastnictví ve třetích zemích, čímž by se skoncovalo s napodobováním a paděláním.
(1a) Whereas the abolition of design protection is contrary to internationally recognised principles of intellectual property protection and would constitute a dangerous precedent for the protection of intellectual property rights in other areas as well at a time when the European Union has undertaken, in particular within the WTO, to press for the acceptance by third countries of a protection regime for intellectual property rights which would put an end to imitation and counterfeiting.
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 98/71/ES o právní ochraně (průmyslových) vzorů
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs
Změna týkající se právní ochrany (průmyslových) vzorů
Amendment of the legal protection of design
o zelené knize o diplomatické a konzulární ochraně občanů Unie ve třetích zemích
on the Green Paper: Diplomatic and consular protection of Union citizens in third countries
– s ohledem na zelenou knihu Evropské komise ze dne 28. listopadu 2006 o diplomatické a konzulární ochraně občanů Unie ve třetích zemích ( KOM(2006)0712 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Green Paper of 28 November 2006 on diplomatic and consular protection of Union citizens in third countries ( COM(2006)0712 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci ( A6‑0454/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0454/2007 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že zastoupení členských států ve třetích zemích je velmi nerovnoměrné,
A. whereas the representation of the Member States in third countries is very uneven,
B. zejména vzhledem k tomu, že diplomatické a konzulární zastoupení všech členských států EU existuje pouze ve 3 státech světa (v Číně, Rusku a USA), že ve 107 zemích má zastoupení maximálně 10 členských států EU a že v některých hojně navštěvovaných oblastech – např. na Maledivách – toto zastoupení neexistuje,
B. whereas in particular in only three of the world's countries (China, Russia and the USA) does each of the EU Member States have diplomatic and consular representation, whereas in 107 countries 10 Member States at most are represented and whereas in certain popular destinations such as the Maldives there is no representation at all,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že počet občanů EU, kteří cestují (v roce 2006 bylo prodáno 180 milionů jízdenek a letenek) nebo žijí mimo EU, prudce roste, mohlo by být evropské zastoupení prostřednictvím delegací Evropské komise zohledněno ve společném úsilí o sdílení zdrojů za účelem kompenzace omezeného rozsahu konzulárních a diplomatických sítí členských států,
C. whereas in response to the explosion in the number of EU citizens travelling (180 million travel documents were sold in 2006) or resident outside the EU, the European presence represented by the Commission delegations could be taken into account in a joint effort to pool resources in order to compensate for the limitations of the Member States' consular and diplomatic networks,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že acquis communautaire je v této oblasti nedostatečné a sestává pouze z rozhodnutí 95/553/ES zástupců vlád členských států zasedajících v Radě ze dne 19. prosince 1995 o ochraně občanů Evropské unie prostřednictvím diplomatických a konzulárních zastoupení
D. whereas the relevant Community acquis is very restricted in extent and consists only of Decision 95/553/EC of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council of 19 December 1995 regarding protection for citizens of the European Union by diplomatic and consular representations
L 314, 28.12.1995, s. 73. a z výměny informací mezi členskými státy v rámci COCON (pracovní skupiny odpovědné za konzulární spolupráci, která byla vytvořena v rámci Rady EU za účelem výměny informací o osvědčených vnitrostátních postupech),
73. , and of exchanges of information among the Member States within COCON (the Council working party on consular cooperation, the task of which is to organise the exchange of information concerning good practices followed by the Member States),
E. vzhledem k iniciativě Komise, která chce prostřednictvím zelené knihy přispět ke konkretizaci (do značné míry opomíjeného) článku 20 Smlouvy o ES, v němž je stanoveno, že pokud členský stát nemá na území třetí země své velvyslanectví nebo konzulární úřad, má každý evropský občan na základě zásady nediskriminace nárok na diplomatickou nebo konzulární ochranu poskytovanou jiným členským státem zastoupeným v této třetí zemi za stejných podmínek jako státní příslušníci tohoto státu,
E. having regard to the Commission initiative in the form of a Green Paper which is intended to put flesh on the little-known Article 20 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which every EU citizen, in the absence of an embassy or a consular post belonging to his own Member State in a third country, shall enjoy the diplomatic and consular protection of any other Member State represented in that third country, in accordance with the principle of non-discrimination and under the same conditions as nationals of that state,
F. vzhledem k tomu, že Komise tímto:
F. whereas in this connection the Commission:
· zohledňuje článek 46 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie, který považuje právo na diplomatickou a konzulární ochranu za základní právo občanů Unie,
· acknowledges Article 46 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in which the right to consular and diplomatic protection is enshrined as a fundamental right of Union citizens,
· plní povinnost přezkoumat rozhodnutí 95/553/ES, což má být učiněno po 5 letech od května 2002, kdy toto rozhodnutí vstoupilo v platnost,
· meets the requirement for Decision 95/553/EC - which came into effect in May 2002 - to be revised after five years,
· předjímá zveřejnění své páté zprávy o občanství EU, která je mimořádnou příležitostí pro oznámení iniciativ, které mohou dále podpořit diplomatickou a konzulární ochranu,
· looks ahead to the Commission's fifth report on EU citizenship, which constitutes a special opportunity for announcing initiatives enabling diplomatic and consular protection to be developed further,
G. avšak vzhledem k tomu, že stávající právní rámec byl dosud vykládán restriktivně, neboť diplomatickou a konzulární ochranu odkazoval do úzké oblasti mezivládních vztahů, kterou spíše než článek 20 Smlouvy upravuje Vídeňská úmluva z roku 1963,
G. whereas, however, the existing legal framework has hitherto been interpreted restrictively, since diplomatic or consular protection has been situated within the narrow field of intergovernmental relations as governed by the 1963 Vienna Convention rather than by Article 20 of the Treaty,
H. vzhledem k tomu, že diplomatická a konzulární ochrana nesmí být zaměňována zejména s úkoly matrikáře či notáře, které jsou na konzulární zastoupení často přenášeny,
H whereas diplomatic and consular protection should not be confused with, among other things, the public registrar or notary duties often assigned to consular representatives,