natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When it issued its two communications, the Commission slightly anticipated the position regarding the general framework for eligibility under the Structural Funds, since the decision on the eligible regions was not due to be taken until 2005.
When it issued its two communications, the Commission slightly anticipated the position regarding the general framework for eligibility under the Structural Funds, since the decision on the eligible regions was not due to be taken until 2005.
Under the new-style economic and social cohesion policy, a specific programme to compensate for additional costs, to be encompassed within the ‘Convergence’ objective and financed by the ERDF for the period from 2007 to 2013, aims to tackle accessibility – the problems are more severe for the outermost regions than for the mainland – both between the outermost regions and within the territory of each region, and support industrial competitiveness.
Under the new-style economic and social cohesion policy, a specific programme to compensate for additional costs, to be encompassed within the ‘Convergence’ objective and financed by the ERDF for the period from 2007 to 2013, aims to tackle accessibility – the problems are more severe for the outermost regions than for the mainland – both between the outermost regions and within the territory of each region, and support industrial competitiveness.
Under the programme it will be possible to finance operating aid to offset additional costs in given sectors.
Under the programme it will be possible to finance operating aid to offset additional costs in given sectors.
In addition, a wider neighbourhood action plan (for cooperation with other outermost regions and integration into the surrounding geographical areas) will be adopted with a view to strengthening economic, social, and cultural ties between the outermost regions and neighbouring territories and widening the natural sphere of socio-economic and cultural influence of the outermost regions, reducing the barriers that limit the opportunities for trade with the surrounding geographical areas (Caribbean markets, America and Africa, and ACP countries).
In addition, a wider neighbourhood action plan (for cooperation with other outermost regions and integration into the surrounding geographical areas) will be adopted with a view to strengthening economic, social, and cultural ties between the outermost regions and neighbouring territories and widening the natural sphere of socio-economic and cultural influence of the outermost regions, reducing the barriers that limit the opportunities for trade with the surrounding geographical areas (Caribbean markets, America and Africa, and ACP countries).
The plan will revolve around two focal points, namely transnational and cross-border cooperation on the one hand and trade and customs measures on the other.
The plan will revolve around two focal points, namely transnational and cross-border cooperation on the one hand and trade and customs measures on the other.
The development strategy for the outermost regions under other Community policies covers measures to promote competitiveness and growth (by developing human capital, services of general economic interest, innovation, the information society, research and technological development, and the environment) and related to the handicaps from which outermost regions suffer (encompassing accessibility, state aid, and traditional agricultural and fishery production).
The development strategy for the outermost regions under other Community policies covers measures to promote competitiveness and growth (by developing human capital, services of general economic interest, innovation, the information society, research and technological development, and the environment) and related to the handicaps from which outermost regions suffer (encompassing accessibility, state aid, and traditional agricultural and fishery production).
Parliament’s view
Parliament’s view
Parliament welcomes the strategy drawn up by the Commission for the outermost regions, demonstrating as it does that careful thought has been given to the factors which, de facto, are preventing convergence and integration with the Union’s other regions.
Parliament welcomes the strategy drawn up by the Commission for the outermost regions, demonstrating as it does that careful thought has been given to the factors which, de facto, are preventing convergence and integration with the Union’s other regions.
The Commission makes it clear how much the revamped economic and social cohesion policy and other Community policies can do to achieve the above aim.
The Commission makes it clear how much the revamped economic and social cohesion policy and other Community policies can do to achieve the above aim.
As far as the new-style cohesion policy is concerned, the means to be employed are the specific programme to compensate for additional costs, along with the wider neighbourhood action plan.
As far as the new-style cohesion policy is concerned, the means to be employed are the specific programme to compensate for additional costs, along with the wider neighbourhood action plan.
As regards the specific programme, Parliament believes that the Commission should look again both at the amounts earmarked, which are manifestly insufficient, and at the way in which programme funding is to be allocated to the seven outermost regions.
As regards the specific programme, Parliament believes that the Commission should look again both at the amounts earmarked, which are manifestly insufficient, and at the way in which programme funding is to be allocated to the seven outermost regions.
Regarding the wider neighbourhood action plan, it believes that the plan should be expressly mentioned in connection with the ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ objective of cohesion policy, funding should be earmarked on an individualised basis, as has been done under the specific programme, and none of the criteria imposed should serve in any way to exclude outermost regions from the action plan.
Regarding the wider neighbourhood action plan, it believes that the plan should be expressly mentioned in connection with the ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ objective of cohesion policy, funding should be earmarked on an individualised basis, as has been done under the specific programme, and none of the criteria imposed should serve in any way to exclude outermost regions from the action plan.
The outermost regions must be genuinely eligible for cross-border cooperation.
The outermost regions must be genuinely eligible for cross-border cooperation.
Parliament likewise takes the view that the wider neighbourhood action plan (and hence the ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ objective of cohesion policy) and indeed the Union’s New Neighbourhood policy should be used not only to foster integration of the outermost regions into the surrounding geographical areas, but also to forge socio-economic and cultural ties with countries where there are emigrant communities from outermost regions or to which outermost regions are linked by traditional bonds (Venezuela, Brazil, the United States, South Africa, Canada, and Australia are among the countries in this category), as this would be in the interest of both sides.
Parliament likewise takes the view that the wider neighbourhood action plan (and hence the ‘European Territorial Cooperation’ objective of cohesion policy) and indeed the Union’s New Neighbourhood policy should be used not only to foster integration of the outermost regions into the surrounding geographical areas, but also to forge socio-economic and cultural ties with countries where there are emigrant communities from outermost regions or to which outermost regions are linked by traditional bonds (Venezuela, Brazil, the United States, South Africa, Canada, and Australia are among the countries in this category), as this would be in the interest of both sides.
Furthermore, it believes that, under the action plan, the Commission must deal with illegal immigration and other related problems facing some of the outermost regions.
Furthermore, it believes that, under the action plan, the Commission must deal with illegal immigration and other related problems facing some of the outermost regions.
As far as other Community policies are concerned, their contribution to the future development strategy for the outermost regions regrettably falls far short of expectations and the action required by the development strategy which the Commission has now drawn up.
As far as other Community policies are concerned, their contribution to the future development strategy for the outermost regions regrettably falls far short of expectations and the action required by the development strategy which the Commission has now drawn up.
The hope was that the Commission would submit innovative specific proposals under the other policies, especially in areas vitally important for competitiveness and growth, including for example innovation, the information society, and research and technological development (as regards this last area, the outermost regions have already submitted a document to the Commission setting out their aspirations).
The hope was that the Commission would submit innovative specific proposals under the other policies, especially in areas vitally important for competitiveness and growth, including for example innovation, the information society, and research and technological development (as regards this last area, the outermost regions have already submitted a document to the Commission setting out their aspirations).
The conclusion which Parliament draws from all the above points is that the Commission’s well-judged development strategy is not being supported in the necessary manner by Community policies and measures or by the financial resources needed for its proper implementation, and the Commission therefore needs to go beyond what it is now proposing.
The conclusion which Parliament draws from all the above points is that the Commission’s well-judged development strategy is not being supported in the necessary manner by Community policies and measures or by the financial resources needed for its proper implementation, and the Commission therefore needs to go beyond what it is now proposing.
Secondly, as regards the general framework for eligibility under the Structural Funds, the current negotiations on the financial perspective and cohesion policy reform constitute a defining moment for the future of the outermost regions, and their special status consequently needs to be defended and safeguarded.
Secondly, as regards the general framework for eligibility under the Structural Funds, the current negotiations on the financial perspective and cohesion policy reform constitute a defining moment for the future of the outermost regions, and their special status consequently needs to be defended and safeguarded.
The possibility of using the Cohesion Fund in future to finance ports and airports in outermost regions under the heading of trans-European transport infrastructure networks must also be expressly provided for in the relevant legislative proposals now under discussion.
The possibility of using the Cohesion Fund in future to finance ports and airports in outermost regions under the heading of trans-European transport infrastructure networks must also be expressly provided for in the relevant legislative proposals now under discussion.
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO ZEMĚDĚLSTVÍ A ROZVOJ VENKOVA
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
k posílení partnerství pro nejvzdálenější regiony
on a stronger partnership for the outermost regions
Výbor pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova vyzývá Výbor pro regionální rozvoj jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. s ohledem na nesnáze, které pociťují nejvzdálenější regiony – odlehlost, ostrovní povaha, malá rozloha, nepřízeň podnebí, hospodářská závislost na malém množství výrobků – a jejichž kombinace vážně ohrožuje rozvoj těchto regionů,
A. having regard to the constraints to which the outermost regions are subject – remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult climate and economic dependence on a small range of products – the combination of which seriously prejudices their development,
B. s ohledem na čl.
B. having regard to Article 299(2) of the Treaty,
3. vítá doporučení na vytvoření specifického programu, který bude kompenzovat zvláštní omezení nejvzdálenějších regionů a který bude přizpůsoben zvláštním rysům každého z nich;
Also notes with approval the recommendation to create a specific programme to compensate for the constraints of the outermost regions, adapted to the specific nature of each of them;
Otázky spojené přímo s odvětvím zemědělství
Issues directly linked to the agricultural sector
U vnitřní společné organizace trhu je třeba zajistit, aby úroveň finančních zdrojů, bez ohledu na druh pomoci, nebyla v budoucnu nižší, než je v současné době;
As regards the internal aspect, it is important to ensure that, irrespective of the support measures, the financial resources in future are no less than at present;
10. podporuje, pokud jde o program POSEI, záměr zajistit stabilitu zdrojů určených na zachování pomoci nejvzdálenějším regionům, decentralizovat a zjednodušit mechanismy řízení.
Backs, finally, as regards the POSEI, the declared intention to ensure the stability of the resources allocated to maintaining support for the outermost regions and to decentralise and simplify the management mechanisms.
Posílení partnerství pro nejvzdálenější regiony
A stronger partnership for the outermost regions
AGRI 13.1.2005
AGRI 13.1.2005
Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos 20.1.2005
Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos 20.1.2005
Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Diamanto Manolakou, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Jeffrey Titford, Terence Wynn
Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Diamanto Manolakou, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Jeffrey Titford, Terence Wynn
Ilda Figueiredo, Béla Glattfelder, Karin Resetarits
Ilda Figueiredo, Béla Glattfelder, Karin Resetarits
Výbor pro rybolov vyzývá Výbor pro regionální rozvoj jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Fisheries asks the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to include the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
B. s ohledem na zvláštní povahu výlučných hospodářských zón (EEZ) nejvzdálenějších regionů, a zejména na to, že na velké části jejich území není kontinentální šelf,
B. having regard to the characteristics of the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of the outermost regions, notably the absence of any continental shelf from most of their area,
C. s ohledem na nutnost zaručit využívání živých vodních zdrojů udržitelným způsobem, a to jak z hospodářského a sociálního hlediska, tak i z hlediska životního prostředí, a zejména vzhledem k nutnosti zachovat rybolovné zdroje v nejvzdálenějších regionech,
C. having regard to the need to guarantee the economically, socially and environmentally sustainable exploitation of living aquatic resources, particularly the need to preserve fish stocks in the outermost regions,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že ekonomiky nejvzdálenějších regionů jsou velmi zranitelné a nemají mnoho příležitostí k diverzifikaci, hrají rybolov a tradiční rybářské komunity v některých případech zásadní socioekonomickou roli a podporují rozvoj dalších vstupních i výstupních hospodářských aktivit,
D. whereas the outermost regions have fragile economies with few possibilities for diversification, where in some cases fishing and ancestral fishing communities play a key social and economic role and strengthen other economic activities upstream and downstream,
E. s ohledem na návrh nařízení Rady o Evropském rybářském fondu ( KOM(2004)0497 ),
E. having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation on the European Fisheries Fund ( COM(2004)0497 ),
F. vzhledem k tomu, že neustávají požadavky na vytvoření specifické strategie a programů pro nejvzdálenější regiony,
F. whereas there have been repeated calls for a specific strategy and programme for the outermost regions,
Obecné úvahy
General considerations:
3. vysoce si cení postoje, který Komise zaujala k nutnosti zohlednit specifika nejvzdálenějších regionů ve společné rybářská politice;
Notes with particular satisfaction the Commission's position regarding the need for the CFP to take count of the characteristics of the outermost regions;
5. je přesvědčen, že by Komise měla ve svých návrzích právních předpisů brát ohled na zvláštní povahu nejvzdálenějších regionů, zejména na zranitelnost rybolovných zón v těchto regionech a na socioekonomický význam rybolovu v některých těchto regionech;
Believes the Commission should take account in its legislative proposals of the specific character of the outermost regions, notably their vulnerability as regards their fisheries zones and the social and economic importance of the fisheries sector in some of them;
7. je přesvědčen, že by Komise měla ve svých návrzích právních předpisů vzít v úvahu nutnost zaručit rybářským plavidlům nejvzdálenějších regionů pozitivní diskriminaci v přístupu k mořským zdrojům v souladu s ustanovením smluv a společnou rybářskou politikou; je přesvědčen, že by Komise měla tímto způsobem zajistit udržitelnost drobného rybolovu a drobného pobřežního rybolovu; Evropský parlament potvrzuje své legislativní usnesení ze dne 4. června 2003 týkající se návrhu nařízení Rady o řízení intenzity rybolovu některých rybolovných oblastí a zdrojů Společenství, kterým se mění nařízení EHS č. 2847/93;
Believes the Commission should take account in its legislative proposals of the need to offer the fishing fleets of the outermost regions positive discrimination as regards access to the maritime resources of their zones, in accordance with the Treaties and the CFP; believes that the Commission should thus safeguard the sustainability of small-scale fishing and small-scale coastal fishing; Parliament thus reaffirms its legislative resolution of 4 June 2003 on a proposal for a Council regulation on the management of the fishing effort relating to certain Community fishing areas and resources and modifying Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93;
9. je přesvědčen, že by Komise měla v Evropském rybářském fondu zachovat úroveň podpory, která již byla přidělena v rámci Finančního nástroje pro orientaci rybolovu, a uspokojit tak požadavky vyplývající ze specifického znevýhodnění nejvzdálenějších regionů a z jejich socioekonomické struktury;
Believes the Commission should maintain in the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) the level of aid currently granted under the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG), with a view to meeting the needs arising from the specific handicaps of the outermost regions and their socio-economic fabric;
12. je přesvědčen, že by Komise měla ve svém návrhu nařízení o Evropském rybářském fondu rozšířit rámec podpory poskytované rybářskému zpracovatelskému odvětví a odvětví akvakultury tak, aby mohla pokrýt také potřeby středně velkých podniků;
Believes the Commission should, in its proposal for a regulation on the EFF, extend the scope of support to the fisheries-products processing industry and the aquaculture sector, so as to ensure that at least medium-sized undertakings are also included;
Výbor požádaný o stanovisko Datum oznámení na zasedání
Committee asked for an opinion Date announced in plenary
Duarte Freitas 13.4.2005
Duarte Freitas 13.4.2005
Datum přijetí pozměňovacích návrhů
Date adopted
Náhradníci přítomní při závěrečném hlasování
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
ECON 13.1.2005
ECON 13.1.2005
ECON 7.9.2004
ECON 7.9.2004
Sérgio Marques 19.1.2005
Sérgio Marques 19.1.2005
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Graham Booth, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Ambroise Guellec, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Alain Hutchinson, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Tunne Kelam, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, István Pálfi, Markus Pieper, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Graham Booth, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Ambroise Guellec, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Alain Hutchinson, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Tunne Kelam, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, István Pálfi, Markus Pieper, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
PE 353.620v02-00
PE 353.620v02-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................43
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................45
STANOVISKO Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ...........................44
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............47
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2004)0599 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0599 )
Dosud nezveřejněno v Úředním věstníku. ,
Not yet published ,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro životní prostředí, veřejné zdraví a bezpečnost potravin a stanovisko Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ( A6‑0247/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0247/2005 ),
(3) Mezi problémy plynoucí z neexistence vhodně přizpůsobených léčivých přípravků pro děti patří neadekvátní informace o dávkování vedoucí ke zvýšeným rizikům nežádoucích účinků, včetně smrti, neúčinná léčba v důsledku nedostatečného dávkování, nedostupnost nejnovějších léčebných postupů a používání improvizovaných přípravků, které mohou být nekvalitní.
(3) Problems resulting from the absence of suitably adapted medicines for children include inadequate dosing information leading to increased risks of adverse reactions including death, ineffective treatment through under-dosing, non-availability to children of therapeutic advances, as well as the use of extemporaneous formulations to treat children which may be of poor quality.
(3) Mezi problémy plynoucí z neexistence vhodně přizpůsobených léčivých přípravků pro děti patří neadekvátní informace o dávkování vedoucí ke zvýšeným rizikům nežádoucích účinků, včetně smrti, neúčinná léčba v důsledku nedostatečného dávkování, nedostupnost nejnovějších léčebných postupů, typů přípravků a způsobů podávání a používání improvizovaných přípravků, které mohou být nekvalitní.
(3) Problems resulting from the absence of suitably adapted medicines for children include inadequate dosing information leading to increased risks of adverse reactions including death, ineffective treatment through under-dosing, non-availability to children of therapeutic advances, the type of formulation and the route of administration as well as the use of extemporaneous formulations to treat children which may be of poor quality.