natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With regard to this role, the current Ombudsman has shown that he is well aware of its potential by proposing on the one hand to step up cooperation with his national or regional counterparts, through joint enquiries or establishing a telephone hotline with access to the ombudsmen's network, and, on the other hand, opening more own-initiative enquiries and promoting the highest standards of European public administration.
With regard to this role, the current Ombudsman has shown that he is well aware of its potential by proposing on the one hand to step up cooperation with his national or regional counterparts, through joint enquiries or establishing a telephone hotline with access to the ombudsmen's network, and, on the other hand, opening more own-initiative enquiries and promoting the highest standards of European public administration.
The statute governing the Ombudsman's activities derives from a parliamentary decision of 9 March 1994.
The statute governing the Ombudsman's activities derives from a parliamentary decision of 9 March 1994.
That is why Mr Diamandouros has repeated his request that the statute be amended with a view inter alia to giving the Ombudsman broader powers of enquiry, particularly as regards access to documents and the hearing of witnesses.
That is why Mr Diamandouros has repeated his request that the statute be amended with a view inter alia to giving the Ombudsman broader powers of enquiry, particularly as regards access to documents and the hearing of witnesses.
While endorsing the need for such measures, the Committee on Petitions stresses that it is vital to maintain the impartiality of this influential body which acts as a conciliator between the European public administration and citizens and providing extrajudicial remedies.
While endorsing the need for such measures, the Committee on Petitions stresses that it is vital to maintain the impartiality of this influential body which acts as a conciliator between the European public administration and citizens and providing extrajudicial remedies.
Accordingly, and regardless of the uncertainty surrounding the fate of the Constitutional Treaty, it does not seem appropriate to give the Ombudsman the power to bring legal proceedings.
Accordingly, and regardless of the uncertainty surrounding the fate of the Constitutional Treaty, it does not seem appropriate to give the Ombudsman the power to bring legal proceedings.
The fact that the European Ombudsman has always shown a preference for the interpretation of Community rules provided by the case law of the European Court of Justice does not mean that he needs to ask for its rulings on the most sensitive aspects of the cases he examines, such as those where questions of principle concerning violations of fundamental rights are at stake.
The fact that the European Ombudsman has always shown a preference for the interpretation of Community rules provided by the case law of the European Court of Justice does not mean that he needs to ask for its rulings on the most sensitive aspects of the cases he examines, such as those where questions of principle concerning violations of fundamental rights are at stake.
However, Parliament has just adopted the Gal own-initiative report
However, Parliament has just adopted the Gal own-initiative report
Own-initiative report on promotion and protection of fundamental rights; the role of national and European institutions including the Fundamental Rights Agency (2005-2007(INI)), adopted on 26 May 2005. on the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, in which it points out that the institutions enjoy the right to bring actions before the Court in the interests of the law and that Parliament can, using that means, 'defend the rights of citizens in cases where fundamental rights might be affected by a Union act'.
Own-initiative report on promotion and protection of fundamental rights; the role of national and European institutions including the Fundamental Rights Agency (2005-2007(INI)), adopted on 26 May 2005. on the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, in which it points out that the institutions enjoy the right to bring actions before the Court in the interests of the law and that Parliament can, using that means, 'defend the rights of citizens in cases where fundamental rights might be affected by a Union act'.
Here, the Ombudsman could play his role by condemning cases of maladministration that may constitute a violation of fundamental rights through special reports or by highlighting in his annual report particular cases symptomatic of recurring malfunctions in European bureaucracy, in particular in the light of the principles and procedural rules on good administration and transparency enshrined in Articles 41 and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Here, the Ombudsman could play his role by condemning cases of maladministration that may constitute a violation of fundamental rights through special reports or by highlighting in his annual report particular cases symptomatic of recurring malfunctions in European bureaucracy, in particular in the light of the principles and procedural rules on good administration and transparency enshrined in Articles 41 and 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
With this in view, the European Ombudsman could enjoy fruitful cooperation with the future Fundamental Rights Agency and play an important role in the multi-layered structure ('network of networks') envisioned in the abovementioned report, so as to avoid overlapping of activities by different bodies.
With this in view, the European Ombudsman could enjoy fruitful cooperation with the future Fundamental Rights Agency and play an important role in the multi-layered structure ('network of networks') envisioned in the abovementioned report, so as to avoid overlapping of activities by different bodies.
Lastly, the Committee on Petitions endorses the Ombudsman's request to the European Commission to propose legislation seeking to promote good administration in the Union's institutions and bodies.
Lastly, the Committee on Petitions endorses the Ombudsman's request to the European Commission to propose legislation seeking to promote good administration in the Union's institutions and bodies.
It stresses, however, that this is not essential if the Commission chooses to adopt the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for its own services.
It stresses, however, that this is not essential if the Commission chooses to adopt the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour for its own services.
That is why the European Parliament urges the new Commission under the presidency of Mr Barroso to take all necessary measures without delay to show that, despite the political uncertainty surrounding the Union's future, it genuinely intends to launch the ‘Plan D’ for democracy and dialogue with citizens announced at the June part-session in Strasbourg, so as to help the Union overcome the crisis of public confidence in its institutions.
That is why the European Parliament urges the new Commission under the presidency of Mr Barroso to take all necessary measures without delay to show that, despite the political uncertainty surrounding the Union's future, it genuinely intends to launch the ‘Plan D’ for democracy and dialogue with citizens announced at the June part-session in Strasbourg, so as to help the Union overcome the crisis of public confidence in its institutions.
Výroční zpráva o činnosti evropského veřejného ochránce práv za rok 2004
The annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman for the year 2004
PETI 4.7.2005
PETI 4.7.2005
Manolis Mavrommatis 17.3.2005
Manolis Mavrommatis 17.3.2005
Projednán í ve výboru
Discussed in committee
Robert Atkins, Mairead McGuinness, Manolis Mavrommatis, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Andreas Schwab, Richard Seeber, Rainer Wieland, Michael Cashman, Proinsias De Rossa, Alexandra Dobolyi, Maria Matsouka, Janelly Fourtou, Diana Wallis, David Hammerstein Mintz, Marcin Libicki, Roger Helmer,
Robert Atkins, Mairead McGuinness, Manolis Mavrommatis, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Andreas Schwab, Richard Seeber, Rainer Wieland, Michael Cashman, Proinsias De Rossa, Alexandra Dobolyi, Maria Matsouka, Janelly Fourtou, Diana Wallis, David Hammerstein Mintz, Marcin Libicki, Roger Helmer,
o návrhu pro rámcové rozhodnutí Rady o boji proti organizované trestné činnosti
on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the fight against organised crime
PE 357.878v02-00
PE 357.878v02-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................22
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................211
STANOVISKO výboru pro zahraniční vĚCI ...........................................................24
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...............................................244
STANOVISKO Výboru pro právní záležitosti ......................................................32
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................31
– s ohledem na návrh Komise ( KOM(2005)0006 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0006 )
OJ C ... / V Úředním věstníku (OJ) ještě nebylo zveřejněno. ,
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci a stanoviska Výboru pro zahraniční věci a Výboru pro právní záležitosti a vnitřní trh ( A6-0277/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market ( A6‑0277/2005 ),
(3) Podle bodu 3.3.2 Haagského programu se sbližování hmotného trestního práva týká oblastí spadajících do zvlášť závažné trestné činnosti, která má přeshraniční rozměr a je třeba upřednostnit oblasti trestné činnosti, které jsou zvláště uvedeny ve smlouvách.
(3) Point 3.3.2 of the The Hague Programme states that the approximation of substantive criminal law serves the same purposes and concerns areas of particular serious crime with cross border dimensions and that priority should be given to areas of crime that are specifically mentioned in the treaties.
Definice protiprávního jednání týkajícího se účasti na zločinném spolčení by tedy měla být jednotná ve všech členských státech.
The definition of offences relating to participation in a criminal organisation should therefore be approximated in all the Member States.
Na druhou stranu by měly být pro fyzické i právnické osoby, které se dopustily takovýchto protiprávních jednání nebo jsou za ně odpovědné, stanoveny tresty a sankce odpovídající závažnosti těchto protiprávních jednání.
Moreover, penalties corresponding to the seriousness of these offences should be envisaged against natural and legal persons who committed them or are responsible for their commission.
(3) Podle bodu 3.3.2 Haagského programu se sbližování hmotného trestního práva týká oblastí spadajících do zvlášť závažné trestné činnosti , která má přeshraniční rozměr a je třeba upřednostnit oblasti trestné činnosti, které jsou zvláště uvedeny ve smlouvách.
(3) Point 3.3.2 of the The Hague Programme states that the approximation of substantive criminal law serves the same purposes and concerns areas of particular serious crime with cross border dimensions and that priority should be given to areas of crime that are specifically mentioned in the treaties.
Členské státy však mohou definovat jako zločinecké organizace i jiné skupiny osob, například takové, které nejsou zaměřeny na dosažení finančního nebo jiného materiálního zisku nebo které páchají trestné činy, za něž jim hrozí příkaz k zadržení nebo trest odnětí svobody v trvání maximálně čtyři roky .
The Member States are also free, however, to classify other groups of persons as criminal organisations, e.g. groups whose purpose is not that of financial or other material gain or which commit offences punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of less than four years.
Na druhou stranu by měly být pro fyzické i právnické osoby, které se dopustily takovýchto protiprávních jednání neob nebo jsou za ně odpovědné, stanoveny tresty a sankce odpovídající závažnosti těchto protiprávních jednání.
Moreover, penalties corresponding to the seriousness of these offences should be envisaged against natural and legal persons who committed them or are responsible for their commission.
The framework decision lays down minimum conditions.
The framework decision lays down minimum conditions.
But the Member States are, of course, free to go beyond these minima when defining what constitutes a criminal organisation.
But the Member States are, of course, free to go beyond these minima when defining what constitutes a criminal organisation.
(4) Také je třeba stanovit zvláštní trestnost pro „řízení zločinného spolčení“ a zahrnout ustanovení vedoucí k usnadnění spolupráce mezi soudními orgány a koordinace jejich akcí prostřednictvím Eurojustu.
(4) Provision should be made for a specific offence of ‘directing a criminal organisation’, with provisions to facilitate cooperation between the judicial authorities and coordination of their action via Eurojust.
(4) Také je třeba stanovit zvláštní trestnost pro „ podporu, založení, organizování nebo řízení zločinecké organizace“ a zahrnout ustanovení vedoucí k usnadnění spolupráce mezi soudními orgány a koordinace jejich akcí prostřednictvím Eurojustu.
(4) Provision should be made for a specific offence of ‘ promoting, setting up, organising or directing a criminal organisation’, with provisions to facilitate cooperation between the judicial authorities and coordination of their action via Eurojust.
(4a) Pokud dojde k přijetí nástroje na ochranu osobních dat podle třetího pilíře, měla by se rozvíjet spolupráce mezi Interpolem a Europolem v tom směru, že si budou vyměňovat informace za účelem vyšetřování přeshraniční organizované trestné činnosti.
(4a) Subject to the adoption of a third-pillar data protection instrument, cooperation between Interpol and Europol should be developed with a view to information being shared for the purpose of investigating transnational organised crime.
Bod odůvodnění 4 b (nový)
Recital 4 b (new)
(4b) Pokud dojde k přijetí rámcového rozhodnutí o evropském důkazním příkazu k získání předmětů, dokumentů a údajů pro trestní řízení, měly by členské státy zjednodušit vzájemné uznávání důkazů proti pachatelům přeshraniční organizované trestné činnosti.
(4b) Subject to the adoption of the Framework Decision on the European Evidence Warrant for obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters, Member States should facilitate the mutual recognition of evidence obtained against the perpetrators of transnational organised crime.
The mutual recognition of evidence is a corner stone in improving the combating of international organised crimes.
The mutual recognition of evidence is a cornerstone in improving the combating of international organised crimes.
The European Evidence Warrant must therefore be adopted and implemented as soon as possible.
The European Evidence Warrant must therefore be adopted and implemented as soon as possible.
(5a) Vzhledem k tomu, že rozvoj a struktura dobře fungujících a mobilních mezinárodních sítí zločineckých organizací zpomaluje vyšetřování, mělo by se v zájmu přiměřenější reakce na tento jev a vyšší efektivnosti spolupráce mezi členskými státy přemýšlet o prostředcích, pomocí nichž by bylo možné podpořit koordinované iniciativy na úrovni členských států s cílem vytvářet vhodné nástroje, jako například speciální vyšetřovací a infiltrační metody a techniky a právní úpravu pro informátory, která již existuje v některých členských státech;
(5a) Given that the development and structuring of highly efficient and mobile international criminal networks slows down investigations, and in order to provide a more appropriate response to this phenomenon and to increase the effectiveness of cooperation between Member States, it would be useful to think about ways of promoting coordinated initiatives at Member State level to develop appropriate instruments such as special inquiry and infiltration methods and techniques, as well as rules on informers, which already exist in some Member States.
(6a) Očekává se, že na základě tohoto rámcového rozhodnutí se podaří přesvědčit třetí země, aby zavedly podobné předpisy.
(6a) This Framework Decision is expected to provide a basis for persuading third countries to introduce similar regulations.
Členské státy by jim v tom měly jít příkladem a prokázat své pevné odhodlání.
The Member States should set an example by giving strong proof of their determination.
Lack of the EU legislation on fight against organised crime puts EU in a difficult position in discussions with international partners.
Lack of the EU legislation on fight against organised crime puts EU in a difficult position in discussions with international partners.
Having this Framework Council Decision in place will give EU stronger basis for encouraging third countries to adopt similar legislation.
Having this Framework Council Decision in place will give EU stronger basis for encouraging third countries to adopt similar legislation.
(7a) Zločinecké organizace přecházejí beztrestně a se značným ziskem vnitřní hranice Evropské unie, zatímco policisté, jejichž pravomoc se omezuje pouze na jejich vlastní členský stát, hranice přecházet nemohou (s výjimkou určitých okolností).
(7a) Criminal organisations cross the internal frontiers of the European Union with impunity and considerable benefit to themselves, while police officers, their powers being limited to their home Member State only, cannot (except in certain short-term situations).
Z toho vyplývá naléhavá nutnost zřídit policii Evropské unie, aby se proti organizované trestné činnosti mohlo bojovat za rovných podmínek.
Accordingly, there is a pressing need to create a European Union police force in order to combat organised crime on level terms.
For as long as law enforcement officers are not given equivalent powers to fight the international organised criminal gangs on equal terms, the Union's citizens will continue to be exploited through trafficking of drugs and of human beings, and through many other types of serious crimes.
For as long as law enforcement officers are not given equivalent powers to fight the international organised criminal gangs on equal terms, the Union’s citizens will continue to be exploited through trafficking of drugs and of human beings, and through many other types of serious crimes.
(8) Toto rámcové rozhodnutí respektuje základní práva zaručená Evropskou úmluvou o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobod a vyplývající z ústavních tradic, které jsou společné členským státům a tvoří základ práva Společenství.
(8) This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they emerge from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States as principles of Community law.
Ustanovení tohoto rámcového rozhodnutí nesmí být vykládána způsobem, který by vedl k okleštění nebo omezení základních práv nebo svobod , jako je právo na stávku, svobod a shromažďování, svobod a sdružování nebo projevu, včetně práva každého jedince zakládat s ostatními odborové organizace a stát se jejich členem za účelem ochrany vlastních zájmů a s tím souvisejícího práva na demonstraci.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as the right to strike, freedom of assembly, of association or of expression, including the right of everyone to form and to join trade unions with others for the protection of his or her interests and the related right to demonstrate.
The importance to respect fundamental rights in the context of the fight against organised crime should be clearly underlined in this part of the Framework Decision.
The importance to respect fundamental rights in the context of the fight against organised crime should be clearly underlined in this part of the Framework Decision.
This formulation is identical to the one used in the Council Framework Decision on combating terrorism of 13 June 2002.
This formulation is identical to the one used in the Council Framework Decision on combating terrorism of 13 June 2002.
Pro účely tohoto rámcového rozhodnutí se „zločinným spolčením“ rozumí strukturovaná skupina více než dvou osob existující po delší dobu , které jedná ve shodě s cílem páchat protiprávní jednání, za která lze uložit trest odnětí svobody nebo opatření omezující svobodu s horní hranicí sazby nejméně čtyři roky nebo vyšší trest, za účelem získání, přímo či nepřímo, finanční výhody nebo jiné hmotné výhody.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association , established over a period of time, of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
Pro účely tohoto rámcového rozhodnutí se „zločinným spolčením“ rozumí strukturovaná skupina více než dvou osob, která jedná ve shodě s cílem páchat protiprávní jednání, za která lze uložit trest odnětí svobody nebo opatření omezující svobodu s horní hranicí sazby nejméně čtyři roky nebo vyšší trest, za účelem získání, přímo či nepřímo, finanční výhody nebo jiné hmotné výhody.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, ‘criminal organisation’ means a structured association of more than two persons, acting in concert with a view to committing offences which are punishable by deprivation of liberty or a detention order of a maximum of at least four years or a more serious penalty in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other material benefit.
The requirement for an organisation to have been established over a period of time should not be seen as an essential criterion for defining this offence, as there may be cases where criminal organisations have only recently been established.
The requirement for an organisation to have been established over a period of time should not be seen as an essential criterion for defining this offence, as there may be cases where criminal organisations have only recently been established.
Furthermore, as the provision is general and vague, it would create doubts about the period of time necessary.
Furthermore, as the provision is general and vague, it would create doubts about the period of time necessary.
Lastly, it would entail an excessive burden of proof.
Lastly, it would entail an excessive burden of proof.
Pojmem „strukturovaná skupina“ se rozumí skupina, která není vytvořena nahodile, aby se okamžitě dopustila protiprávního jednání a jejíž členové nemusejí nutně mít přesně vymezené úlohy a v níž není nezbytná kontinuita členství ani rozvinutá struktura.
‘Structured association’ means an association that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of an offence and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members, continuity of its membership or a developed structure.
Pojmem „strukturovaná skupina“ se rozumí skupina, která není vytvořeno nahodile, aby se okamžitě, společně, dopustila jednoho nebo více trestných činů a jejíž členové nemusejí nutně mít přesně vymezené úlohy a v níž není nezbytná kontinuita členství ani hierarchická struktura.
‘Structured association’ means an association that is not randomly formed for the immediate commission of one or more offences acting in concert and that does not need to have formally defined roles for its members, continuity of its membership or a hierarchical structure.