natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Support expenditure for operations of Regional policy policy area
Support expenditure for operations of Regional policy policy area
13 49 04 01
13 49 04 01
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Expenditure on administrative management
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Expenditure on administrative management
421 108,62
421 108,62
13 49 04 02
13 49 04 02
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession (ISPA) — Expenditure on administrative management
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession (ISPA) — Expenditure on administrative management
152 636,09
152 636,09
Article 13 49 04 — Subtotal
Article 13 49 04 — Subtotal
573 744,71
573 744,71
Chapter 13 49 — Total
Chapter 13 49 — Total
Title 13 — Total
Title 13 — Total
28 629 428 109
28 629 428 109
22 843 704 270
22 843 704 270
27 103 805 946
27 103 805 946
20 925 964 234
20 925 964 234
26 558 980 242,83
26 558 980 242,83
21 886 965 322,16
21 886 965 322,16
Constanze Angela Krehl 14.3.2005
Constanze Angela Krehl 14.3.2005
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Graham Booth, Bernadette Bourzai, Bairbre de Brún, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Ambroise Guellec, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Jim Higgins, Alain Hutchinson, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Yiannakis Matsis, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Elisabeth Schroedter, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Graham Booth, Bernadette Bourzai, Bairbre de Brún, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Ambroise Guellec, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Jim Higgins, Alain Hutchinson, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Yiannakis Matsis, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Elisabeth Schroedter, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006: Section III – Commission
Výbor pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova vyzývá Rozpočtový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
7. domnívá se, že částky zapsané v PNR pro zemědělství představují absolutní minima, a žádá proto, aby byly ve všech položkách obnoveny prostředky ve výši PNR – je to o to nezbytnější, že odhady Komise, z nichž vycházejí částky v PNR, se velmi často při pohledu na skutečný vývoj na trzích ukazují jako optimistické;
Takes the view that the amounts entered in the PDB for agriculture represent the bare minimum and therefore calls for all PDB lines to be restored, which is all the more vital given that the Commission’s forecasts, on which the PDB figures are based, very often turn out to be optimistic by comparison with actual market developments;
13. navrhuje zvýšit finanční prostředky na zlepšování podpory kvalitních produktů, na podporu regionálního prodeje a regionálních značek a také částky určené na informování o společné zemědělské politice;
Proposes that there should be an increase in funding for improved promotion of quality products and for promotion of regional marketing and regional labels and in funding for provision of information on the common agricultural policy;
Návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006: Oddíl III - Komise
Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006 - Section III – Commission
Katerina Batzeli 20.1.2005
Katerina Batzeli 20.1.2005
Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Duarte Freitas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf , María Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Jean-Claude Martinez, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Duarte Freitas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf , María Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Jean-Claude Martinez, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
K přípravě předběžného návrhu rozpočtu na rok 2006 přistupovala Komise opatrně.
The Commission opts for a cautious approach when drawing up the proposal for the Preliminary Draft Budget 2006.
Předběžný návrh rozpočtu zaznamenal nárůst položek závazků na 121 miliard EUR a položek plateb na 112,5 miliard EUR.
The Preliminary draft budget registers an amount in commitment appropriations and in payment appropriations which is increasing, respectively, to € 121 billion and € 112,5 billion.
Dříve než uvedeme rozdělení výdajů podle jednotlivých oblastí odvětví rybolovu, je třeba zdůraznit, že evropský rybářský průmysl je na evropském rozpočtu značně závislý: 900 milionů EUR z celkové částky 1,1 miliardy EUR poskytované Evropskou unií a národními a regionálními orgány pochází z rozpočtu EU.
Before summarising the distribution of expenditure among the different areas of the fisheries sector it is necessary to stress that the European fisheries industry is extremely dependent on the European budget: of the total amount of € 1.1 billion provided by the European Union and national and regional authorities, about € 900 million come from EU budget.
V předběžném návrhu rozpočtu, který předkládá Komise, je na rybolov přiděleno 1,08 miliard EUR, což ve srovnání s předchozím rozpočtem představuje nárůst o 2,7 %.
The Preliminary Draft Budget presented by the Commission allocates € 1.08 billion to fisheries, registering an increase of 2.7% in comparison with the previous budget.
Obecně návrh sleduje stejný trend jako předchozí rozpočet, zejména pokud jde o provádění společné rybářské politiky (SRP) po reformě v roce 2002.
In general terms the proposal follows the trend of the previous one, particularly as regards the implementation of the CFP as reformed in 2002.
Komise navrhuje:
The Commission sets up:
- zvýšení počtu regionálních poradních sborů (RPS); v souladu s cíly reformy SRP;
- an increase in the number of Regional Advisory Councils (RAC); in line with the objectives of the CFP reform.
V oblasti mořského rybolovu navrhuje Komise dva kroky, jejichž provádění vyžaduje zvýšení celkové částky
Regarding the maritime area, the Commission proposes two initiatives whose implementation requires an increase of the total amount
- rozšíření působnosti na záležitosti spojené s mořským rybolovem.
- extension of the competence to maritime affairs.
Bude potřeba další finanční částka na pokrytí nákladů na vypracování „Zelené knihy“ o budoucí námořní politice Evropské unie a na uspořádání konference o Zelené knize;
An additional amount of money will be necessary to cover the elaboration of a "Green Paper" on the European Union Future Maritime Policy and the organisation of a conference on the Green Paper;
- výdaje v oblasti mořského práva, které jsou zařazeny do kapitoly 11 Rybolov, a předpokládá se příspěvek pro OSN ve výši 200 000 EUR.
- the expenditure in the area of the Law of the Sea; which comes under Chapter 11 Fisheries and an amount for the contribution to the United Nations of € 200.000 has been foreseen.
Pokud se týče okruhů, v návrhu rozpočtu je v rámci okruhu I (Zemědělství) přiděleno na položky závazků 33 200 000 EUR.
As regards the headings; the draft budget allocates € 33.200.000 in commitment appropriations under Heading I (Agriculture).
Celková částka se neliší od částky, kterou Komise předložila v roce 2005.
The total amount is unchanged from the one tabled by the Commission in 2005.
Na druhé straně zaznamenal okruh II (Strukturální opatření ) nárůst položek závazků, kde částka vzrostla z 680 500 EUR v roce 2005 na přibližně 696 800 EUR.
On the other hand Heading II (Structural Operations) registers an increase in terms of allocation in commitment appropriations, the amount going up from € 680.500 in 2005 to about € 696.800.
U činností uváděných v rámci okruhu III (Vnitřní politiky) vzrostly přidělené položky závazků ze 106 000 000 EUR v roce 2005 na 108 000 000 EUR, což představuje zvýšení o 2,1 %.
For the actions under Heading III (Internal Policies) the amount goes up from about € 106.000.000 allocated in 2005 to about € 108.000.000 in commitment appropriations, registering an increase of 2.1%.
U Okruhu IV (Vnější akce) , zahrnujícímu mezinárodní dohody, na které se vztahuje dohodovací řízení, je v návrhu rozpočtu na položku závazků přidělena částka 202 100 000 milionů EUR, což představuje celkové zvýšení o 5,9 milionů EUR (3 % navýšení oproti předchozímu rozpočtu.
For Heading IV (External Action), which includes international agreements covered by the conciliation procedure, the draft report assigns about € 202.100.000 in commitment appropriations, registering an increase of € 5,9 million (3% more than in the previous budget).
Rozpočet na rok 2006 pro odvětví rybolovu byl vypracován v duchu kontinuity s minulostí.
The budget for 2006, as regards the fisheries sector, has been drawn up in a spirit of continuity with the past.
Přestože obecně je návrh dobře rozčleněn, je nutno zdůraznit, že by Komise měla zohlednit důsledky minulého a budoucího rozšíření EU, jež má na činnosti spojené s rybolovem sociálně-ekonomický dopad.
Whereas, in general terms, the proposal is well structured, it is necessary to underline that the Commission should take into account the consequences of the last and the next European Enlargement, whose impact produces socio-economic effects on activities related to fisheries.
a) podporovat přestavbu rybářského průmyslu v nových členských státech;
a) to support the rebuilding of the fishing industry in the new Member States;
b) dále posilovat postavení nových členských států v odvětví rybolovu v rámci EU;
b) to further strengthen the European position of the new Member States in the fisheries sector;
5. zdůrazňuje, že by rozpočet měl za účelem dosažení cílů udržitelné společné rybářské politiky podpořit vytváření regionálních poradních sborů, které představují hlavní diskuzní fórum pro vědecké pracovníky a rybáře;
Underlines that the budget should support the development of Regional Advisory Councils which represent the main forum of discussion for scientists and fishermen in order to achieve a sustainable Common Fisheries Policy;
Návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006: Oddíl III – Komise
draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006 - Section III - Commission
Jan Mulder 30.3.2005
Jan Mulder 30.3.2005
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, David Casa, Paulo Casaca, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Alfred Gomolka, Pedro Guerreiro, Heinz Kindermann, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Albert Jan Maat, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Bernard Poignant, Struan Stevenson, Margie Sudre, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, David Casa, Paulo Casaca, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Alfred Gomolka, Pedro Guerreiro, Heinz Kindermann, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Albert Jan Maat, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Bernard Poignant, Struan Stevenson, Margie Sudre, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna
Duarte Freitas, Jan Mulder, María Isabel Salinas García, Helga Trüpel
Duarte Freitas, Jan Mulder, María Isabel Salinas García, Helga Trüpel
THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGET (PDB)
THE PRELIMINARY DRAFT BUDGET (PDB)
The European Community budget for 2006 will be the last annual budget under the current Financial Perspective
The European Community budget for 2006 will be the last annual budget under the current Financial Perspective
Inter-institutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure, OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p.1. , which has been the framework for annual budgetary procedures since 2000.
Inter-institutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure, OJ C 172, 18.6.1999, p.1. , which has been the framework for annual budgetary procedures since 2000.
The Preliminary Draft Budget adopted by the Commission on 27 April 2005 proposes commitment appropriations of EUR 121,3 billion (4% more than in 2005) and payment appropriations of EUR 112,6 billion (5,9% more than in 2005).
The Preliminary Draft Budget adopted by the Commission on 27 April 2005 proposes commitment appropriations of EUR 121,3 billion (4% more than in 2005) and payment appropriations of EUR 112,6 billion (5,9% more than in 2005).
As in previous years, it is foreseen that, taken together, agriculture and rural development (42%), and the structural and cohesion funds (37%), will take up almost four-fifths of the Commission budget in 2006.
As in previous years, it is foreseen that, taken together, agriculture and rural development (42%), and the structural and cohesion funds (37%), will take up almost four-fifths of the Commission budget in 2006.
The budget lines for which this Committee is responsible are spread over a number of policy areas in the PDB
The budget lines for which this Committee is responsible are spread over a number of policy areas in the PDB
· 9 (Information Society)
· 9 (Information Society)
· 15 (Education and Culture)
· 15 (Education and Culture)
· 16 (Press and Communication)
· 16 (Press and Communication)
Appropriations for these policy areas are entered under two headings in the Financial Perspective: Heading 3 (Internal Policies) covers appropriations for operational expenditure and Heading 5 (Administration) covers the administrative expenditure related to the policy areas.
Appropriations for these policy areas are entered under two headings in the Financial Perspective: Heading 3 (Internal Policies) covers appropriations for operational expenditure and Heading 5 (Administration) covers the administrative expenditure related to the policy areas.
The PDB proposes EUR 9,2 billion (an increase of 1,8%) in commitment appropriations for Heading 3 (which is made up of about two dozen policy areas), including a small unallocated margin of EUR 167 million.
The PDB proposes EUR 9,2 billion (an increase of 1,8%) in commitment appropriations for Heading 3 (which is made up of about two dozen policy areas), including a small unallocated margin of EUR 167 million.
The PDB proposes an increase of 6,2% in appropriations for Heading 5 compared with budget 2005, largely to pay for the recruitment of additional staff following enlargement.
The PDB proposes an increase of 6,2% in appropriations for Heading 5 compared with budget 2005, largely to pay for the recruitment of additional staff following enlargement.
Policy area 9 (Information Society) : The PDB proposes that budget lines for the Media programme, for other measures in the audiovisual sector and for the i2i initiative, be transferred from policy area 15 (Article 15 05 01 in budget 2005) to policy area 9, reflecting the reallocation of responsibilities between individual Commissioners.
Policy area 9 (Information Society) : The PDB proposes that budget lines for the Media programme, for other measures in the audiovisual sector and for the i2i initiative, be transferred from policy area 15 (Article 15 05 01 in budget 2005) to policy area 9, reflecting the reallocation of responsibilities between individual Commissioners.
Policy area 15 (Education and Culture ): The following are noteworthy:
Policy area 15 (Education and Culture ): The following are noteworthy:
· 15 01 04 30 : a significant increase in funding for the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture established in late 2004
· 15 01 04 30 : a significant increase in funding for the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture established in late 2004
· 15 02 02 05 : a substantial increase in appropriations for Erasmus Mundus as the programme builds up
· 15 02 02 05 : a substantial increase in appropriations for Erasmus Mundus as the programme builds up
· 15 05 04 : the running-down of appropriations for the European Year of Education through Sport 2004, as the year ends and payments for activities undertaken in connection with it fall;
· 15 05 04 : the running-down of appropriations for the European Year of Education through Sport 2004, as the year ends and payments for activities undertaken in connection with it fall;
· a substantial increase in funding for the European University Institute in Florence ( 15 02 01 03) , but significant cuts in appropriations proposed for town-twinning partnerships ( 15 06 01 07) and for grants to cultural organisations advancing the idea of Europe ( 15 04 01 03)
· a substantial increase in funding for the European University Institute in Florence ( 15 02 01 03) , but significant cuts in appropriations proposed for town-twinning partnerships ( 15 06 01 07) and for grants to cultural organisations advancing the idea of Europe ( 15 04 01 03)
· in the final year of the Financial Perspective, appropriations for the multi-annual programmes (Socrates, Youth, Media Plus, Culture) are on target to commit Community money up to the ceilings agreed in co-decision, although the draftsman notes that in the case of the Youth programme this has resulted in a reduction in commitment appropriations compared with budget 2005
· in the final year of the Financial Perspective, appropriations for the multi-annual programmes (Socrates, Youth, Media Plus, Culture) are on target to commit Community money up to the ceilings agreed in co-decision, although the draftsman notes that in the case of the Youth programme this has resulted in a reduction in commitment appropriations compared with budget 2005
· cuts in appropriations as the following preparatory actions and pilot projects run down:
· cuts in appropriations as the following preparatory actions and pilot projects run down:
§ 15 04 02 03 : Preparatory actions for cooperation on cultural matters
§ 15 04 02 03 : Preparatory actions for cooperation on cultural matters
§ 15 04 03 01 : Preparatory measures for promotion of the linguistic diversity of the Community in the information society
§ 15 04 03 01 : Preparatory measures for promotion of the linguistic diversity of the Community in the information society
§ 15 05 02 : Pilot projects for participation of young people
§ 15 05 02 : Pilot projects for participation of young people
§ 15 05 03 : Sport: preparatory measures for a Community policy in the field of sport
§ 15 05 03 : Sport: preparatory measures for a Community policy in the field of sport
Policy area 16 (Press and Communication) : There is no separate and distinct legal base for expenditure on information and communication actions, but the Inter-institutional Group on Information which is co-chaired by the Parliament, Council and Commission, lays down common guidelines for the development of a communication and information policy strategy for the EU.
Policy area 16 (Press and Communication) : There is no separate and distinct legal base for expenditure on information and communication actions, but the Inter-institutional Group on Information which is co-chaired by the Parliament, Council and Commission, lays down common guidelines for the development of a communication and information policy strategy for the EU.
The most striking features of proposals for this policy area in the PDB are:
The most striking features of proposals for this policy area in the PDB are:
· the high proportion of total appropriations which are devoted to administrative expenditure (63% in budget 2005, 64 % in PDB 2006)
· the high proportion of total appropriations which are devoted to administrative expenditure (63% in budget 2005, 64 % in PDB 2006)
· reduced appropriations for Actions in the field of communication (16 03 02), PRINCE - debate on the future of the EU (16 03 04), Tools for information to the citizens (16 04 02), Communication Tools (16 04 03), and Information Outlets (16 05 01)
· reduced appropriations for Actions in the field of communication (16 03 02), PRINCE - debate on the future of the EU (16 03 04), Tools for information to the citizens (16 04 02), Communication Tools (16 04 03), and Information Outlets (16 05 01)
· slightly higher appropriations for Direct Communication - Media (16 02 03) and Public opinion analysis and proximity actions (16 03 01).
· slightly higher appropriations for Direct Communication - Media (16 02 03) and Public opinion analysis and proximity actions (16 03 01).
· a substantial increase in appropriations for Citizens' information via the media (16 02 02).
· a substantial increase in appropriations for Citizens' information via the media (16 02 02).
Other information actions : The PRINCE programme was broken down into five separate actions in 2004.
Other information actions : The PRINCE programme was broken down into five separate actions in 2004.
In PDB 2006, the following lines are relevant:
In PDB 2006, the following lines are relevant:
· 01 02 04 (Economic and financial affairs) PRINCE - Communication on economic and monetary union, including the Euro: ECON is the responsible committee.
· 01 02 04 (Economic and financial affairs) PRINCE - Communication on economic and monetary union, including the Euro: ECON is the responsible committee.
· 16 03 04 PRINCE - Debate on the future of the European Union: AFCO is the responsible committee.
· 16 03 04 PRINCE - Debate on the future of the European Union: AFCO is the responsible committee.
· 18 08 01 (Justice and home affairs) PRINCE - Area of freedom, security & justice: LIBE is the responsible committee.
· 18 08 01 (Justice and home affairs) PRINCE - Area of freedom, security & justice: LIBE is the responsible committee.
· 19 11 03 (External Relations) PRINCE - Role of the European Union in the world. - AFET is the responsible committee
· 19 11 03 (External Relations) PRINCE - Role of the European Union in the world. - AFET is the responsible committee
· 22 04 01 (Enlargement) PRINCE - Information and communication strategy: AFET is the responsible committee.
· 22 04 01 (Enlargement) PRINCE - Information and communication strategy: AFET is the responsible committee.
The PDB proposes the following appropriations:
The PDB proposes the following appropriations:
(EUR millions):
(EUR millions):
01 02 04
01 02 04
18 08 01
18 08 01
22 04 01
22 04 01
European Schools In policy area 26 (Commission's administration), there is a separate budget line for each school and for the Board of Governors.
European Schools In policy area 26 (Commission's administration), there is a separate budget line for each school and for the Board of Governors.
THE DRAFT BUDGET (DB)
THE DRAFT BUDGET (DB)
The Council completed its first reading and adopted the Draft Budget on 15 July.
The Council completed its first reading and adopted the Draft Budget on 15 July.
It has amended the PDB in four important ways:
It has amended the PDB in four important ways:
· Payment appropriations for operational expenditure have been cut throughout Heading 3.
· Payment appropriations for operational expenditure have been cut throughout Heading 3.