natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zajistí, aby projekty vyhovovaly kritériím stanoveným v článku 3, a dají přednost těm, které v největší míře přispějí k dosažení cílů tohoto nařízení.
They shall ensure that projects meet the criteria set out in Article 3, giving priority to those projects that make the greatest contribution to the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation.
V souladu s předchozími pozměňovacími návrhy.
Consistency with earlier amendments.
Komise pravidelně uveřejňuje seznamy projektů financovaných pomocí LIFE+, včetně stručného popisu jejich cílů a dosažených výsledků a shrnutí vynaložených finančních prostředků.
The Commission shall regularly publish lists of projects financed through LIFE+, including a short description of objectives and results achieved and a summary of funds expended.
V souladu s předchozími pozměňovacími návrhy, kterými se vypouští princip svěření plnění rozpočtu.
Consistent with earlier amendments deleting the principle of delegated management.
Příjemci podpory v rámci tohoto nařízení poskytnou informace o finančních prostředcích získaných z rozpočtu Společenství a o žádostech, které předložili Komisi pro centrálně financovaná opatření, nebo která předložili národním agenturám pro delegovaná opatření.
The beneficiaries under this Regulation shall provide information on funding they have received from the Community budget and on their ongoing applications for funding to the Commission for centrally financed measures or to the national agency for delegated measures .
Bude se usilovat o součinnost a doplňkovost s dalšími nástroji Společenství.
Synergies and complementarity shall be sought with other Community instruments.
Nařízení neposkytuje finanční prostředky na opatření, která spadají do hlavní oblasti působnosti jiných finančních nástrojů Společenství nebo z nich získávají finanční podporu k témuž účelu, a to včetně Evropského fondu pro regionální rozvoj, Evropského sociálního fondu, Fondu soudržnosti, Evropského zemědělského fondu pro rozvoj venkova, rámcového programu konkurenceschopnosti a inovací, Evropského fondu pro rybolov a sedmého rámcového programu.
This Regulation shall not finance measures which fall within the main scope of, or receive assistance for the same purpose from, other Community financial instruments, including the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, or the European Fisheries Fund.
Příjemci podpory v rámci tohoto nařízení poskytnou informace o finančních prostředcích získaných z rozpočtu Společenství a o žádostech, které předložili Komisi pro centrálně financovaná opatření, nebo která předložili národním agenturám pro delegovaná opatření.
The beneficiaries under this Regulation shall provide information on funding they have received from the Community budget and on their ongoing applications for funding to the Commission.
Komise zajistí koordinaci a doplňkovost s dalšími nástroji Společenství.
The Commission shall ensure coordination and complementarity with other Community instruments.
Pozměňovací návrh EP č. 24 žádal, aby Komise zajistila dostatečnou koordinaci finančních nástrojů, aby se zjistilo také integrované financování správy Natura 2000.
There is thus no reason to exclude them from funding if the aim is to achieve integrated programmes.
Dodatečných 100 milionů odsouhlasených v kontextu finančních prostředků v okruhu 2 by mělo být v rámci programu LIFE+ plně věnováno na financování demonstrací v souvislosti s programem Natura 2000 a financování správy biologické rozmanitosti.
The extra € 100 million agreed in the context of FINP for heading 2 should be assigned in full to LIFE+ to fund N2000 related demonstration and biodiversity management activities.
Komise k částce, která by byla výsledkem rozhodnutí Evropské rady, přidala pouze 50 milionů.
The Commission only added 50 million to the amount that would have resulted from the European Council decision.
Dalších 50 milionů €, které Komise nyní dala stranou pro stropy okruhů v rámci rozpočtu, by proto měly být přidány k rozpočtu programu LIFE+.
The other € 50 million now set aside by the Commission for the budget heading margins should therefore be added to LIFE+.
Kromě toho orientační rozdělení prostředků, jak je stanoveno v listu 94 REV1 (ceny pro rok 2004) uvádělo částku 1,861 milionu, nikoli 1,854 milionu.
Moreover the Commission indicative breakdown as shown in Fiche 94 REV1 (2004 prices) mentioned an amount of 1.861 million and not 1.854.
Částka by se proto měla rovnat 1,861 milionu + 50 milionů = 1,911 milionu (v cenách pro rok 2004).
Thus the amount should be 1.861 + 50 million = 1.911 million (2004 prices).
LIFE+ je nesmírně důležitý finanční nástroj na ochranu životního prostředí a zejména přírody a biologické rozmanitosti.
LIFE+ is an extremely important financial instrument for the protection of the environment, and in particular for nature and biodiversity.
Dodatečných 100 milionů EUR dohodnutých v rámci finančního výhledu bylo určeno na program Natura 2000.
The additional €100 million negotiated during the Financial Perspective was intended for Natura 2000.
Význam programu LIFE+ pro přírodu a biologickou rozmanitost mezitím vzrostl v důsledku nedostatku odpovídajících opatření u velké části Evropy v rámci strukturálních fondů, fondů pro rybolov a fondů na rozvoj venkova, například v návrzích programovacích dokumentů.
The importance of LIFE+ for nature and biodiversity has since increased due to the lack of adequate provision across much of Europe under the Structural, Fisheries and Rural Development funds, for example in draft programming documents.
V případě jakéhokoli opatření a projektu financovaného pomocí LIFE+ předloží příjemce technickou a finanční zprávu o postupu prací , a to Komisi v případě ústředně financovaných opatření , nebo vnitrostátní agentuře v případě pověřených opatření .
For any measures and projects financed by LIFE+, the beneficiary shall submit, to the Commission for centrally financed measures or to the national agency for delegated measures, technical and financial reports on the progress of work.
Do tří měsíců od dokončení projektu se předloží také závěrečná zpráva.
A final report shall also be submitted within three months of the completion of the project.
V případě jakéhokoli opatření a projektu financovaného pomocí LIFE+ předloží příjemce v případě financovaných opatření technickou a finanční zprávu o postupu prací Komisi.
For any measures and projects financed by LIFE+, the beneficiary shall submit to the Commission, for measures in receipt of funding , technical and financial reports on the progress of work.
Zprávy budou předloženy orgánu odpovědnému za poskytování finančních prostředků.
The reports should be submitted to the body responsible for funding.
Kontroly Komise na místě by kromě finančních aspektů měly také hodnotit dosažení cílů politiky EU.
The Commission on the spot checks should verify and assess the achievement of EU policy objectives as well as financial procedures.
V návaznosti na zavedení nových ustanovení týkajících se komitologie (rozhodnutí Rady ze dne 17. července 2006) je nezbytné upravit připravované právní předpisy.
Following the introduction of the new comitology provisions (Council Decision of 17 July 2006), it is necessary to adapt pending legislation.
Tento pozměňovací návrh zavádí nový „regulační postup s kontrolou“ do programu LIFE+.
This amendment introduces the new "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" to LIFE+.
c) doplnění opatření do přílohy I nebo změna přílohy II a
(c) to add measures to Annex I or to amend Annex II; and
b) stanovení podrobných pravidel nezbytných pro provádění tohoto nařízení,
(d) to lay down detailed rules necessary for the implementation of this Regulation.
(d) stanovení podrobných pravidel nezbytných pro provádění tohoto nařízení jiných než opatření obecného rozsahu určených ke změně nepodstatných prvků tohoto nařízení ve smyslu rozhodnutí Rady ze dne 17. července 2006 (2006/512/ES).
(d) to lay down detailed rules necessary for the implementation of this Regulation, other than measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements thereof, within the meaning of the Council Decision of 17 July 2006 (2006/512/EC).
(b) doplnění opatření do přílohy I a pozměnění přílohy II.
(b) to add measures to the Annex.
V návaznosti na zavedení nových ustanovení týkajících se komitologie (rozhodnutí Rady ze dne 17. července 2006) je nezbytné upravit připravované právní předpisy.
Following the introduction of the new comitology provisions (Council Decision of 17 July 2006), it is necessary to adapt the pending legislation.
V případě programu LIFE+ by měl pro přijetí víceletého strategického programu a přílohu I, která stanoví opatření způsobilá k získání finanční podpory, platit nový regulační postup s kontrolou.
In the case of LIFE+, the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny should apply to the adoption of the multi-annual strategic programmes and Annex 1 defining measures eligible for funding.
Jedná se o „téměř legislativní“ opatření ve smyslu rozhodnutí 2006/512/ES.
They are 'quasi-legislative' measures in the meaning of Decision 2006/512/EC.
d) zavedení ukazatelů, které pomohou sledovat opatření financovaná pomocí LIFE+.
(d) to establish indicators to assist the monitoring of measures financed by LIFE+.
c) zavedení ukazatelů, které pomohou sledovat opatření financovaná pomocí LIFE+.
(d) to establish indicators to assist the monitoring of measures financed by LIFE+.
Příloha I bod 1 úvodní věta
Annex I, point 1, introductory phrase
1. pokud jde o rozpočet, který podléhá ústřednímu přímému řízení:
1. as regards the budget subject to central direct management:
(a) určité operační činnosti nevládních organizací, které jsou činné zejména v oblasti ochrany a zlepšování životního prostředí na Evropské úrovni,
(a) certain operational activities of NGOs that are primarily active in protecting and enhancing the environment at European level,
a) operační aktivity nevládních organizací, které jsou činné zejména v oblasti ochrany a zlepšování životního prostředí na Evropské úrovni a podílí se na rozvoji a uplatňování evropských politik a právních předpisů,
(a) operational activities of non-governmental organisations that are primarily active in protecting and enhancing the environment at European level and involved in the development and implementation of EU policy and legislation ,
Pozměňovací návrh EP č. 36.
EP amendment 36.
b) rozvoj a údržba počítačových sítí a systémů, které jsou přímo spojeny s uplatňováním politiky životního prostředí Společenství a příslušnými právními předpisy;
(b) developing and maintaining networks and computer systems directly linked to the implementation of Community environmental policy and legislation;
b) rozvoj a údržba počítačových sítí , databází a systémů, které jsou přímo spojeny s uplatňováním politiky životního prostředí Společenství a příslušnými právními předpisy , zejména jde o zlepšení přístupu veřejnosti k informacím o životním prostředí;
(b) developing and maintaining networks , databases and computer systems directly linked to the implementation of Community environmental policy and legislation, in particular when improving public access to environmental information ;
Pozměňovací návrh EP č. 12 a 42 k článku 2.
EP amendments 12 and 42 to Article 2.
Příloha I bod 2 úvodní věta
Annex I, point 2, introductory phrase
2. pokud jde o rozpočet, který podléhá buď ústřednímu přímému nebo pověřenému řízení:
2. as regards the budget subject to either central direct or delegated management:
Příloha I bod 2 podbod c)
Annex I, point 2 (c)
c) pomoc při budování kapacit,
(c) capacity building assistance;
c) pomoc při budování kapacit a jejich zdokonalování ,
(c) capacity building and improvement assistance;
Je nezbytné nejen vytvářet, ale také vylepšovat to, co již bylo vytvořeno.
It is necessary not only to create knowledge but to improve it where it already exists.
Příloha I bod 2 podbod h)
Annex I, point 2 (h)
h) náklady na zaměstnance vnitrostátních agentur a
(h) national agencies' staff costs;
The work done by Parliament during the first reading of the proposal for a regulation on LIFE+ has resulted in a significant number of improvements.
The work done by Parliament during the first reading of the proposal for a regulation on LIFE+ has resulted in a significant number of improvements.
Parliament recognised unanimously that the LIFE+ financial instrument is not equal to meeting the environmental challenges faced.
Parliament recognised unanimously that the LIFE+ financial instrument is not equal to meeting the environmental challenges faced.
Its limited financial resources are insufficient for the purpose of implementing all of the environmental policies initiated by the European Union.
Its limited financial resources are insufficient for the purpose of implementing all of the environmental policies initiated by the European Union.
The main issue addressed during Parliament's first reading was seeing to it that Natura 2000 has the necessary funding to ensure that this exemplary network for conserving, protecting and managing European biodiversity in situ is able to operate effectively.
The main issue addressed during Parliament's first reading was seeing to it that Natura 2000 has the necessary funding to ensure that this exemplary network for conserving, protecting and managing European biodiversity in situ is able to operate effectively.
A third component, such as formed part of the previous LIFE instrument, has now been reintroduced in the Council's common position and the Commission communication on the common position.
A third component, such as formed part of the previous LIFE instrument, has now been reintroduced in the Council's common position and the Commission communication on the common position.
Among other things, this Nature and Biodiversity component is to support and enable the further development and implementation of the Natura 2000 network, including in relation to coastal and marine habitats and species.
Among other things, this Nature and Biodiversity component is to support and enable the further development and implementation of the Natura 2000 network, including in relation to coastal and marine habitats and species.
However, the victory which we won on the amount to be included for the funding of Natura 2000 (one third of the European contribution to the €21 billion of funding estimated by the Commission) has not been reflected in the 2007-2013 budget.
However, the victory which we won on the amount to be included for the funding of Natura 2000 (one third of the European contribution to the €21 billion of funding estimated by the Commission) has not been reflected in the 2007-2013 budget.
Despite the persistent pressure exerted during the negotiations on the financial perspective, only €100 million was allocated to LIFE+ Natura 2000 .
Despite the persistent pressure exerted during the negotiations on the financial perspective, only €100 million was allocated to LIFE+ Natura 2000 .
And whilst the whole of this sum should be entered under the LIFE+ instrument, there is a shortfall of €50 million.
And whilst the whole of this sum should be entered under the LIFE+ instrument, there is a shortfall of €50 million.
In order to rectify this, an amendment is being tabled calling for the sum of €100 million agreed during the negotiations on the financial perspective to be reinstated.
In order to rectify this, an amendment is being tabled calling for the sum of €100 million agreed during the negotiations on the financial perspective to be reinstated.
Moreover, even though the guarantee that co-financing for Natura 2000 is to be provided through the structural funds (such as the ERDF and the EAFRD) is not entirely satisfactory, commitments on environmental projects have been entered into and must be respected in the granting of European funding.
Moreover, even though the guarantee that co-financing for Natura 2000 is to be provided through the structural funds (such as the ERDF and the EAFRD) is not entirely satisfactory, commitments on environmental projects have been entered into and must be respected in the granting of European funding.
In order to ensure that this is the case, amendment 3 from the first reading is also being retabled.
In order to ensure that this is the case, amendment 3 from the first reading is also being retabled.
If the funding of Natura 2000 was the main focus of the report at first reading on LIFE+, particularly in the light of the negotiations taking place on the financial perspective and adjustment of the budget, your rapporteur wishes to focus during the second reading on aspects relating to the allocation of budgetary resources.
If the funding of Natura 2000 was the main focus of the report at first reading on LIFE+, particularly in the light of the negotiations taking place on the financial perspective and adjustment of the budget, your rapporteur wishes to focus during the second reading on aspects relating to the allocation of budgetary resources.
The Commission is proposing that 80% of funding be allocated to the Member States.
The Commission is proposing that 80% of funding be allocated to the Member States.
This would mean that all of the European added value would be lost, and above all it would give a blank cheque to Member States to pursue national objectives.
This would mean that all of the European added value would be lost, and above all it would give a blank cheque to Member States to pursue national objectives.
The example of the funding of personnel costs is very revealing.
The example of the funding of personnel costs is very revealing.
In your rapporteur's view, European funding for the environment must not be used to make up for the financial deficits experienced by Member States in order to fund personnel costs in the field of the environment, but must be used to implement European projects.
In your rapporteur's view, European funding for the environment must not be used to make up for the financial deficits experienced by Member States in order to fund personnel costs in the field of the environment, but must be used to implement European projects.
With regard to the implementation of the programme, your rapporteur takes the view that it should be organised on the basis of objective criteria and not on the basis of automatic redistribution of Community funds to the Member States.
With regard to the implementation of the programme, your rapporteur takes the view that it should be organised on the basis of objective criteria and not on the basis of automatic redistribution of Community funds to the Member States.
The other aspect which should be reemphasised is the importance of involving civil society, in particular through NGOs and habitat committees, in the process of drawing up multiannual programmes and national annual programmes.
The other aspect which should be reemphasised is the importance of involving civil society, in particular through NGOs and habitat committees, in the process of drawing up multiannual programmes and national annual programmes.
Parliament must also, upon submission of Commission communications, be informed about the various phases of programming.
Parliament must also, upon submission of Commission communications, be informed about the various phases of programming.
Parliament must be able to exercise its power of scrutiny.
Parliament must be able to exercise its power of scrutiny.
Of course, LIFE+ could have benefited from an ambitious budget.
Of course, LIFE+ could have benefited from an ambitious budget.
In this context, the strategy being developed by the Commission of integrating environmental aspects into other policy instruments is not yet tried and tested.
In this context, the strategy being developed by the Commission of integrating environmental aspects into other policy instruments is not yet tried and tested.
Apart from the financial instrument, Parliament will need to pay particular attention to the way in which the Gothenburg sustainable development strategy is taken into account in funding, particularly with regard to transport, fisheries and development policy and pre-accession measures.
Apart from the financial instrument, Parliament will need to pay particular attention to the way in which the Gothenburg sustainable development strategy is taken into account in funding, particularly with regard to transport, fisheries and development policy and pre-accession measures.
We have a major responsibility.
We have a major responsibility.
Biodiversity is a continuous, dynamic process, which must be supported.
Biodiversity is a continuous, dynamic process, which must be supported.
Given that areas of Europe form a tapestry of complex biological relationships, helping ensure the sustainability of our societies, areas with a great diversity of species must be accorded central importance within Europe.
Given that areas of Europe form a tapestry of complex biological relationships, helping ensure the sustainability of our societies, areas with a great diversity of species must be accorded central importance within Europe.
And because European policy first and foremost serves the interests of the peoples of Europe, it is imperative to ensure that an essential and irreplaceable resource is conserved for them.
And because European policy first and foremost serves the interests of the peoples of Europe, it is imperative to ensure that an essential and irreplaceable resource is conserved for them.
Climate change is the other challenge to which we must rise.
Climate change is the other challenge to which we must rise.
Underpinning the fight against rises in temperature, LIFE+ provides financial support for new technologies, in particular those designed to achieve energy efficiency.
Underpinning the fight against rises in temperature, LIFE+ provides financial support for new technologies, in particular those designed to achieve energy efficiency.
In this area, LIFE+ should support the innovative measures which European citizens wish to see.
In this area, LIFE+ should support the innovative measures which European citizens wish to see.
Your rapporteur invites the members of the European Parliament to support her proposals for second reading amendments.
Your rapporteur invites the members of the European Parliament to support her proposals for second reading amendments.
With the help of the LIFE+ instrument, we must remain focused on the importance of the environment to the European project.
With the help of the LIFE+ instrument, we must remain focused on the importance of the environment to the European project.
The environment is the only reference point which citizens have in the face of a lack of direction in Europe and the calling into question of Community institutions.
The environment is the only reference point which citizens have in the face of a lack of direction in Europe and the calling into question of Community institutions.
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o finančním nástroji pro životní prostředí (LIFE+)
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+)
7.7 2005
7.7 2005
A6-0131/2005 P6_TA(2005)0291
A6-0131/2005 P6_TA(2005)0291
ENVI 4.10.2004
ENVI 4.10.2004