natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V případě „jemných částic“ (PM 2,5 ) platí v USA mezní hodnota koncentrace 15 mg, avšak je třeba poznamenat, že americká norma je založena na výsledcích měření prováděného v průběhu tříletého období a že měření není vždy soustředěno na skutečně ožehavé oblasti.
For concentrations of fine particles (PM 2.5 ) a limit of 15 mg applies in the US, although it should be noted that the standard in the US is based on the results of measurements taken over a three‑year period and that measurements are not always focused on the real hot spots.
Z posouzení dopadů vyplývá, že pokud bude vybrán ambiciózní scénář a EU jasně zvolí lidské zdraví, bude dostatek šancí na nové pracovní příležitosti.
If a more ambitious scenario is chosen and the EU makes a clear choice in favour of health, there will be many opportunities for creating new jobs, as is shown by the Impact Assessment.
Kvalita ovzduší představuje problém ve všech velkých městech na světě.
Air quality is a problem in all of the world's cities.
Technologie a inovace vyvíjené v Evropě mají možnost uspět i v jiných částech světa.
The technology and innovation being developed in Europe has the potential to be applied in other parts of the world.
Strategie: ambiciózní, ale s důrazem na požadavky realizace
The strategy: ambitious, but also taking account of the demands of implementation
Vaše zpravodajka by ráda rychle zaznamenala lepší výsledky v boji se znečištěným ovzduším.
Your rapporteur would like to quickly see better results achieved in the fight against air pollution.
Z toho důvodu byl pro PM 2,5 , VOC a NO X vybrán scénář C.
Scenario C has therefore been chosen for PM 2.5, VOCs and NOx.
Následují argumenty na podporu výběru scénáře C–:
The following arguments may be given in favour of opting for scenario C- :
* Větší přínos pro lidské zdraví než v případě scénáře A+, jelikož právě PM 2,5 , VOC a NO X způsobují největší poškození zdraví.
*Greater health gains than in the case of scenario A+ , as it is PM 2.5, VOCs and NOx which cause the most damage to health;
* Scénář C– je plně nákladově efektivní, avšak celkové náklady, které činí 11 miliard EUR ročně, jsou značně nižší, než v případě scénáře C (14,9 miliard EUR).
*Scenario C- is fully cost-effective, but the total costs, at EUR 11 billion a year, are substantially lower than for scenario C (EUR 14.9 billion);
* Příznivý rozvoj co se týče zaměstnanosti a potenciálu pro inovace.
*Favourable in terms of growth in employment and potential for innovation.
Scénář C– povede k nárůstu pracovních míst o více než 40 000, neboť ztráta pracovních míst v zemědělském odvětví bude omezená a v ostatních odvětvích naopak vznikne mnoho pracovních příležitostí.
Scenario C- will lead to more than 40 000 new jobs as job losses in the agricultural sector will be limited and many new jobs will be created in other sectors.
Vaše zpravodajka se v případě amoniaku, stejně jako Komise, rozhodla pro scénář A+ a v případě SO 2 pro scénář B, a to z následujících důvodů:
In the case of ammonia, your rapporteur – like the Commission –has opted for scenario A+ and in the case of SO 2 has opted for scenario B, for the following reasons:
* Zvýšení nákladů spojené s přechodem na scénář C je v případě amoniaku příliš vysoké.
*The increase in costs entailed by scenario C is very high in the case of ammonia;
* Dosud nebyla zohledněna reforma zemědělské politiky, jejíž dopad tedy ještě není zřejmý.
*The reform of agricultural policy has not yet been taken into account and its impact is as yet unclear.
Z toho důvodu vaše zpravodajka vyzývá k revizi a ambicióznějšímu přístupu v případě amoniaku, až začne reforma SZP nabývat konkrétnější podoby.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling for a review and a more ambitious approach to tackling ammonia when the reform of the CAP begins to take shape;
* Amoniak se na tvorbě sekundárních jemných částic podílí pouze zanedbatelně a celkové náklady na regulaci primárních a sekundárních jemných částic na základě míry ambicí C a v případě amoniaku na základě A+ jsou přibližně stejně vysoké, jako kdyby byl pro amoniak vybrán scénář C.
*The contribution made by ammonia to the formation of secondary fine particles is a small one, and the total costs of tackling primary and secondary fine particles on the basis of level of ambition C and ammonia on the basis of A+ are approximately as high as if scenario C were also to be chosen for ammonia;
* Pro SO 2 je přijatelný scénář B, jelikož scénář C by znamenal relativně malé zvýšení přínosů pro lidské zdraví.
*Scenario B is acceptable for SO 2 as scenario C would bring relatively few additional health benefits.
Vaše zpravodajka si přirozeně uvědomuje, že cíle, které zde byly stanoveny, jsou ambiciózní a nesnadno dosažitelné.
Your rapporteur is aware, of course, that the objectives set here are ambitious and will not be easy to achieve.
Některé členské státy mají již v současné době problémy se stávajícími cíly.
There are Member States which are already having difficulty in meeting the current objectives.
Z toho důvodu se vaše zpravodajka zasazuje o dočasnou výjimku pro členské státy, které mohou prokázat, že podnikly veškeré možné kroky k dosažení limitních hodnot uvedených v této tematické strategii, avšak přesto nejsou schopny normy splňovat.
She is therefore advocating a temporary derogation for Member States which are able to show that they have taken all possible measures to attain the limit values set under this thematic strategy but are nonetheless unable to achieve the standards.
To také poskytne pobídku ke včasnému a úplnému dodržování mezních hodnot.
This will also provide an incentive to early and full compliance with limit values.
Skutečnost, že se stále čeká na vhodná opatření na evropské úrovni zaměřená na zdroje, je přirozeně překážkou pro členské státy, které tyto cíle musejí dodržovat.
The fact that suitable measures at European level targeting sources are still awaited is, of course, an obstacle to Member States which have to meet these objectives.
Úkolem Komise je tedy neodkladně předložit vhodná opatření zaměřená na zdroje a úkolem Rady a Parlamentu je tato opatření neodkladně přijmout.
The Commission therefore has a responsibility to submit suitable measures targeting sources without delay and the Council and Parliament have a responsibility to adopt such measures without delay.
Jakákoli prodleva v tomto postupu by znamenala zdržení náležité ochrany zdraví občanů a životního prostředí.
Any delay in doing so would mean delaying providing adequate protection for citizens' health and the environment.
Vaše zpravodajka si také uvědomuje, že náklady nejsou ve společnosti rozděleny stejně jako přínosy.
Your rapporteur is also aware that the costs are not shared in the same way by society as the benefits.
V podstatě je třeba uplatňovat zásadu „znečišťovatel platí“.
Essentially, the 'polluter pays' principle must be applied.
Ve většině případů jsou producenti schopni přesunout vyšší náklady na spotřebitele.
In most cases producers are able to pass on the higher costs to consumers.
V některých případech je to však mnohem složitější, jelikož konkurenti ze zemí mimo EU nemají nutně stejné náklady.
In some cases, however, that is more difficult as competitors from outside the EU do not necessarily incur the same costs.
Z toho důvodu žádá zpravodajka od Komise posouzení možností financování v případech, kdy náklady nelze přesunout na spotřebitele a kdy jsou náklady pro znečišťovatele neúnosné.
Your rapporteur is therefore calling on the Commission to consider possibilities for providing financing in cases where the costs cannot be passed on to consumers and the costs to polluters are unacceptable.
V této souvislosti by vaše zpravodajka chtěla poukázat na skutečnost, že strukturální fondy a zemědělské fondy EZOZF nabízejí možnosti podpory.
In this connection, your rapporteur wishes to point out that the Structural Funds and the EAGGF offer opportunities for providing support.
Členské státy mohou využívat tato opatření na spolufinancování (například čističky vzduchu v odvětví živočišné výroby).
Member States may use these to co‑finance measures (for example air cleaning equipment in the livestock sector).
Vedle toho mohou členské státy za určitých podmínek udělit podnikům státní podporu.
In addition, Member States may grant businesses state aid under certain conditions.
K realizaci cílů vymezených touto strategií je v různých odvětvích třeba přijmout celou řadu opatření.
Many measures are needed in various sectors in order to achieve the objectives set in this strategy.
V této souvislosti sehrávají svou roli Komise (v oblasti opatření zaměřených na zdroje v odvětví dopravy, na malá spalovací zařízení a tepelné systémy), členské státy (v oblasti čističek vzduchu v zemědělství a lodní dopravě) a decentralizované orgány (v oblasti plánů mobility, ožehavých oblastí, smogových situací).
The Commission has a role to play in this (including in relation to measures targeting sources in the transport sector, small combustion plants and heating systems), as do the Member States (including in relation to air cleaning equipment in the agricultural sector and shipping) and decentralised authorities (in relation to mobility plans, hot spots, smog alerts).
Závěrem: zlepšení právní úpravy a lepší regulace
Finally: better regulation and better regulating
Je správné, že Evropská unie tvrdě pracuje na zajištění „ zlepšení právní úpravy“ , neboť v oblasti tvorby právních předpisů je hodně co zlepšovat.
The European Union is rightly working hard to ensure 'better regulation ', given that there is a great deal of room for improvement in law‑making.
Tematická strategie s doprovodnou směrnicí o jakosti ovzduší jsou příklady „zlepšení právní úpravy“ .
The thematic strategy and the accompanying directive on ambient air quality are examples of 'better regulation '.
Vaše zpravodajka vyslechla představitele vnitrostátních i místních orgánů, podniků a nevládních organizací.
Your rapporteur has listened to the views of representatives of national and local authorities, companies and NGOs.
Z mnoha rozhovorů vyplynula existence určitého roztrpčení spojeného se způsobem, jakým v Evropě vznikají právní předpisy.
What emerged from many of the discussions was a certain irritation with the way in which legislation is enacted within Europe.
Neschopnost uplatňovat vhodné předpisy v praxi a nejistota spojená se střednědobým horizontem představují neustále se opakující oblasti stížnosti.
Above all, the failure of suitable legislation to materialise and uncertainty in the medium-term are complaints that are heard time and again.
Výčet možných opatření v této strategii tuto nejistotu neodstraňuje.
This uncertainty has not been removed by the listing of possible measures in the strategy.
Komunikaci s občany, podniky a nižšími orgány (které musejí uplatňovat značnou část opatření) by prospělo, kdyby Komise, Rada a Parlament jasně uvedly, jakou míru ambicí budou prosazovat v otázce kvality ovzduší a jaká opatření zaměřená na zdroje je možno očekávat a kdy.
It would assist communication with citizens, companies and lower‑level authorities (which are required to implement many of the measures) if it was clear what level of ambition the Commission, the Council and Parliament intend to opt for with regard to air quality and what measures targeting sources can be expected, and when.
Z toho důvodu se vaše zpravodajka zasazuje o interinstitucionální dohodu, ve které by Komise, Rada a Parlament vymezily své odpovědnosti a závazky.
Your rapporteur therefore advocates an interinstitutional agreement in which responsibilities and commitments are laid down by the Commission, the Council and Parliament.
Taková dohoda by přispěla ke „zlepšení právní úpravy“ a zároveň by podpořila demokratický proces.
Such an agreement would contribute towards 'better regulating ' and would promote the democratic process.
REGI 21.3.2006
REGI 21.3.2006
Dorette Corbey 29.11.2005
Dorette Corbey 29.11.2005
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Johannes Blokland, Frieda Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Rebecca Harms, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Dan Jørgensen, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Peter Liese, Marios Matsakis, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Johannes Blokland, Frieda Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Rebecca Harms, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Dan Jørgensen, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Peter Liese, Marios Matsakis, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
(Obnovená konzultace)
(Renewed consultation)
PE 376.314v01-00
PE 376.314v02-00
PŘÍLOHA: Dokumenty, které jsou výsledkem jednání („komitologický balíček“).........................11
ANNEX: Texts forming the outcome of negotiations ('comitology package').................................11
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o ..., kterým se mění rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES o postupech pro výkon prováděcích pravomocí svěřených Komisi
on the draft Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission
(Postup konzultace – obnovená konzultace)
(Consultation procedure - renewed consultation)
– s ohledem na návrh Rady (10126/1/2006)
– having regard to the draft of the Council (10126/1/2006)
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Radě ( KOM(2002)0719 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2002)0719 )
Dosud nezveřejněný v Úředním věstníku. a pozměněný návrh ( KOM(2004)0324 )
Not yet published in OJ. and the amended proposal ( COM(2004)0324 )
– s ohledem na svůj postoj ze dne 2. září 2003
– having regard to its position of 2 September 2003
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro ústavní záležitosti ( A6‑0236/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0236/2006 ),
It may be recalled that the problem was created with the development in the 1960s and 1970s of a system for delegating implementing powers to the Commission whereby the latter is empowered to act in conjunction with a committee of national representatives (at the level of officials).
It may be recalled that the problem was created with the development in the 1960s and 1970s of a system for delegating implementing powers to the Commission whereby the latter is empowered to act in conjunction with a committee of national representatives (at the level of officials).
Except where they are purely advisory, such committees could block the Commission's decision on an implementing measure and refer the matter back to the Council.
Except where they are purely advisory, such committees could block the Commission's decision on an implementing measure and refer the matter back to the Council.
Parliament criticised the fact that only a committee, and not the Parliament, had such a right and that a blocked decision was referred back to Council alone with no parliamentary involvement.
Parliament criticised the fact that only a committee, and not the Parliament, had such a right and that a blocked decision was referred back to Council alone with no parliamentary involvement.
In 1993, under a new codecision procedure, legislative powers were allocated to Parliament and Council on an (almost) equal footing.
In 1993, under a new codecision procedure, legislative powers were allocated to Parliament and Council on an (almost) equal footing.
Parliament took the view that codecision acts, in which Council and Parliament can jointly delegate implementing measures, implied that they should both be involved in defining the procedures for exercising delegated powers and that they should have equal rights regarding retrieval or call‑back.
Parliament took the view that codecision acts, in which Council and Parliament can jointly delegate implementing measures, implied that they should both be involved in defining the procedures for exercising delegated powers and that they should have equal rights regarding retrieval or call‑back.
Council, however, argued that Article 202 of the EC‑Treaty remained unchanged, providing for Council (alone) to define the system for implementing powers.
Council, however, argued that Article 202 of the EC‑Treaty remained unchanged, providing for Council (alone) to define the system for implementing powers.
The key step forward for Parliament which is possible now as outcome of negotiations with the Council and the Commission, is that Parliament will be able to block the adoption of "quasi-legislative" implementing measures to which it objects.
The key step forward for Parliament which is possible now as outcome of negotiations with the Council and the Commission, is that Parliament will be able to block the adoption of 'quasi-legislative' implementing measures to which it objects.
If it does so, the Commission can make a new proposal or table draft legislation.
If it does so, the Commission can make a new proposal or table draft legislation.
The road to the "package"
The road to the 'package'
What is now on the table, a compromise text for a new "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" and a set of draft statements to accompany this text, one to be made by the three institutions jointly and one to be made by the Commission individually, is the - late - fruit of a procedure which started four years ago with a Commission proposal to amend Council's Decision of 1999 on "comitology".
What is now on the table, a compromise text for a new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny' and a set of draft statements to accompany this text, one to be made by the three institutions jointly and one to be made by the Commission individually, is the - late - fruit of a procedure which started four years ago with a Commission proposal to amend Council's Decision of 1999 on 'comitology'.
Proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, COM 719 of 11.12.2002
Proposal for a Council Decision amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, COM 719 of 11.12.2002
On that occasion, the Commission rightly recalled that the Treaty as it stands, does not distinguish between delegation of legislative and exercise of executive powers and that it had proposed to the European Convention to amend Article 202 of the Treaty in order to establish a new system for delegating powers introducing the concept of "delegation of legislative powers".
On that occasion, the Commission rightly recalled that the Treaty as it stands, does not distinguish between delegation of legislative and exercise of executive powers and that it had proposed to the European Convention to amend Article 202 of the Treaty in order to establish a new system for delegating powers introducing the concept of 'delegation of legislative powers'.
It recognized at the same time that a relatively long period will elapse before any new Treaty provisions on this come into force and that the Council's 1999 Decision on comitology needs to be amended now as it does not take account of the fact that in matters governed by the codecision procedure the legislative function is exercised by two institutions, the European Parliament and the Council.
It recognized at the same time that a relatively long period will elapse before any new Treaty provisions on this come into force and that the Council's 1999 Decision on comitology needs to be amended now as it does not take account of the fact that in matters governed by the codecision procedure the legislative function is exercised by two institutions, the European Parliament and the Council.
The Commission proposed therefore a new regulatory procedure giving Parliament and the Council a right to object to draft comitology measures, though limited to "executive measures... designed to widely implement the essential aspects of the basic instrument or adapt certain other aspects of it".
The Commission proposed therefore a new regulatory procedure giving Parliament and the Council a right to object to draft comitology measures, though limited to 'executive measures... designed to widely implement the essential aspects of the basic instrument or adapt certain other aspects of it'.
Article 2a letter b) of the proposed new procedure This right was no longer limited to cases where the Commission had allegedly exceeded its implementing powers, as in the Parliament's "droit de regard" under the existing regime.
Article 2a letter b) of the proposed new procedure This right was no longer limited to cases where the Commission had allegedly exceeded its implementing powers, as in the Parliament's 'droit de regard' under the existing regime.
The proposal was presented as "an initial reform of the current system as a temporary measure, pending the advent of a new system for delegating powers in the new Treaty...using to the maximum effect the legal scope afforded by the current Treaty, which does not allow to go further".
The proposal was presented as 'an initial reform of the current system as a temporary measure, pending the advent of a new system for delegating powers in the new Treaty...using to the maximum effect the legal scope afforded by the current Treaty, which does not allow to go further'.
page 2 of the Explanatory Memorandum
Page 2 of the Explanatory Memorandum
What the Commission meant by this is in essence that when "executive competences" are conferred upon the Commission, it would have to have "the last word", even if Parliament or Council object.
What the Commission meant by this is in essence that when 'executive competences' are conferred upon the Commission, it would have to have 'the last word', even if Parliament or Council object.
This was expressed in the formula "the Commission must either withdraw its draft ...or adopt the proposed measure, possibly amending its draft to take account of the objections".
This was expressed in the formula 'the Commission must either withdraw its draft ...or adopt the proposed measure, possibly amending its draft to take account of the objections'.
Article 5a (5) as proposed by the Commission; highlighting by the author
Article 5a (5) as proposed by the Commission; highlighting by the author
Parliament welcomed the proposal in principle as "an important step forward towards a possibly definitive solution of the age-old problem of comitology"
Parliament welcomed the proposal in principle as 'an important step forward towards a possibly definitive solution of the age-old problem of comitology'
The Commission refused to accept this request, the matter was referred back to committee and the Rapporteur Corbett following intensive talks reached important improvements of the proposal.
The Commission refused to accept this request, the matter was referred back to committee and the Rapporteur Corbett following intensive talks reached important improvements of the proposal.
On the question of whether the Commission could uphold its draft measures in spite of objections however, a breakthrough was at that time not possible.
On the question of whether the Commission could uphold its draft measures in spite of objections however, a breakthrough was at that time not possible.