natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
b) Tato směrnice musí být provedena ve vnitrostátním právu s náležitým ohledem na veškeré mezinárodní závazky EU a jejích členských států a zejména s ohledem na Ženevskou úmluvu a na partnerské smlouvy a dohody o spolupráci s třetími zeměmi.
(b) This Directive shall be implemented and transposed into national legislation with due respect for all the existing international obligations of the EU and its Member States and, in particular, the Geneva Convention and partnership and cooperation agreements concluded with third countries.
c) je nebo byl/a ženatý/vdaná .
(c) is married or has been married.
The fact that a minor is married or has been married could in no way be considered as a factor of maturity.
The fact that a minor is married or has been married could in no way be considered as a factor of maturity.
This is especially relevant in some developing countries where forced marriages of girls at a very early age are usual.
This is especially relevant in some developing countries where forced marriages of girls at a very early age are usual.
Členské státy nedrží ve vazbě osobu z toho důvodu, že se jedná o žadatele o azyl.
Member States shall not hold a person in detention for the reason that he/she is an applicant for asylum.
An asylum application cannot constitute a reason for holding a person in detention.
An asylum application cannot constitute a reason for holding a person in detention.
Rada může kvalifikovanou většinou na návrh Komise a po konzultaci Evropského parlamentu pozměnit společný minimální seznam v souladu s přílohou II tím, že na něj třetí země přidá nebo je z něj vyškrtne.
The Council may, acting by a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament , amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Komise prověří žádost Rady nebo členského státu, aby předložila návrh na změnu společného minimálního seznamu.
The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council or by a Member State that it submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.
Rada může v souladu s postupem stanoveným v článku 251 Smlouvy o ES pozměnit společný minimální seznam v souladu s přílohou II tím, že na něj třetí země přidá nebo je z něj vyškrtne.
The Council may, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty , amend the minimum common list by adding or removing third countries, in accordance with Annex II.
Komise prověří žádost Rady, členského státu nebo Evropského parlamentu , aby předložila návrh na změnu společného minimálního seznamu.
The Commission shall examine any request made by the Council , by a Member State or by the European Parliament that it submit a proposal to amend the minimum common list.
The aim of this amendment is to fully integrate the European Parliament in any further decision involving the adoption and modification of the minimum common list of third countries as safe countries of origin.
The aim of this amendment is to fully integrate the European Parliament in any further decision involving the adoption and modification of the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin.
In fact, according to Article TEC 67, after the approval of this Directive further decisions should be adopted with the co-decision procedure.
In fact, according to Article 67 TEC, after the approval of this Directive further decisions should be adopted with the codecision procedure.
The adoption and modification of such a sensitive issue such as the minimum common list of third countries as safe countries of origin should not be an exception and therefore the European Parliament should be fully involved in its adoption and modification
The adoption and modification of such a sensitive element as the minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin should not be an exception and therefore the European Parliament should be fully involved in its adoption and modification.
Při vypracování návrhu podle odstavců 1 a 2 využije Komise informací členských států, vlastních informací a případně informací UNHCR, Rady Evropy nebo jiných významných mezinárodních organizací.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States, its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Při vypracování návrhu podle odstavců 1 a 2 využije Komise informací členských států a Evropského parlamentu , vlastních informací a případně informací UNHCR, Rady Evropy nebo jiných významných mezinárodních organizací.
When making its proposal under paragraphs 1 or 2, the Commission shall make use of information from the Member States and the European Parliament , its own information and, where necessary, information from UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Na žádost Rady nebo Evropského parlamentu předloží Komise Radě a Evropskému parlamentu zprávu o tom, zda je situace v zemi, která je uvedena na společném minimálním seznamu, nadále v souladu s přílohou II.
Upon request by the Council or the European Parliament , the Commission shall report to the Council and the European Parliament on whether the situation of a country on the minimum common list is still in conformity with Annex II.
Odchylně od odstavce 1 mohou členské státy za účelem posuzování žádostí o azyl zachovat právní předpisy platné v době přijetí této směrnice, které umožňují určit za bezpečné země původu i jiné třetí země než ty, které jsou uvedeny na společném minimálním seznamu, jsou-li přesvědčeny, že osoby v dotyčné třetí zemi nejsou vystaveny:
By derogation to paragraph 1, Member States may retain legislation in force at the time of adoption of this Directive that allows for the national designation of third countries, other than those appearing on the minimum common list, as safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for asylum where they are satisfied that persons in the third countries concerned are neither subject to:
a) pronásledování, jak se vymezeno v článku 9 směrnice Rady 2004/83/ES, ani
(a) persecution as defined in Article 9 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC; nor
a) pronásledování, jak je vymezeno v článku 9 směrnice Rady 2004/83/ES ani
(a) persecution as defined in Article 9 of Council Directive 2004/83/EC; nor
b) mučení nebo nelidskému či ponižujícímu zacházení či trestu
(b) torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment .
b) mučení nebo nelidskému či ponižujícímu zacházení či trestu ani
(b) torture or inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment ; nor
c) diskriminaci v jakékoliv formě na základě náboženství, etnického původu, politického přesvědčení, rasy nebo pohlaví.
c) discrimination in any form on the basis of religion, ethnic origin, political belief, race or sex.
Persecution, torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are sufficiently grave possibilities.
Persecution, torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are sufficiently grave possibilities.
It should be stated for certain, and not "generally", that third country nationals will not suffer any of these treatments should their application be rejected.
It should be stated for certain, and not 'generally', that third country nationals will not suffer any of these treatments should their application be rejected.
Rada přijme nebo pozmění kvalifikovanou většinou na návrh Komise a po konzultaci Evropského parlamentu společný seznam třetích zemí, které se pro účely odstavce 1 považují za bezpečné země.
The Council shall, acting by qualified majority on the proposal of the Commission and after consultation of the European Parliament , adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
V souladu s postupem stanoveným v článku 251 Smlouvy o ES Rada přijme nebo pozmění společný seznam třetích zemí, které se pro účely odstavce 1 považují za bezpečné země.
The Council shall, acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the EC Treaty , adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Členské státy zajistí, aby rozhodnutí v rámci řízení podle odstavce 2 bylo vydáno v přiměřené lhůtě.
Member States shall ensure that a decision in the framework of the procedures provided for in paragraph 2 is taken within a reasonable time.
Během tohoto maximálně čtyřtýdenního období má žadatel o azyl právo na komunikaci se členy své rodiny a se svými právními zástupci i právo na poskytnutí potřebné podpory a pomoci.
During this maximum four ‑week period, the applicant for asylum shall have the right to communicate with members of his/her family and with his/her legal representatives and to receive the necessary support and assistance.
Pozměněný návrh směrnice Rady o minimálních normách pro postupy členských států při přiznávání a odnímání právního postavení uprchlíka
Amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
DEVE 1.12.2004
DEVE 1.12.2004
Feleknas Uca 16.3.2005
Feleknas Uca 16.3.2005
k pozměněnému návrhu směrnice Rady o minimálních normách pro postupy členských států při přiznávání a odnímání právního postavení uprchlíků
on the amended proposal for a Council directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status
The aim of this Directive is to establish minimum standards at the Community level for asylum procedures in Member States in which refugee status is granted or withdrawn.
The aim of this Directive is to establish minimum standards at the Community level for asylum procedures in Member States in which refugee status is granted or withdrawn.
A conclusion reached by 15 members of the Presidency at the Tampere European Council in 1999 states that, in the long term Community rules should lead to a common asylum procedure in the European Union, and that the minimum standards for procedures in the Member States are only a first step towards further harmonisation on procedural rules.
A conclusion reached by 15 members of the Presidency at the Tampere European Council in 1999 states that, in the long term Community rules should lead to a common asylum procedure in the European Union, and that the minimum standards for procedures in the Member States are only a first step towards further harmonisation on procedural rules.
An important aspect in the Tampere conclusions, and of the Hague programme, is the foreseen introduction of codecision for the European Parliament in the field of asylum and migration policies.
An important aspect in the Tampere conclusions, and of the Hague programme, is the foreseen introduction of codecision for the European Parliament in the field of asylum and migration policies.
The Commission's initial proposal for a Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status was presented in September 2000.
The Commission's initial proposal for a Directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status was presented in September 2000.
On 18 June 2002, a reconsultation was launched.
On 18 June 2002, a reconsultation was launched.
Nearly two years of negotiations followed, before Council settled on a common action plan for which it approached Parliament for a second consultation on the 19 November 2004.
Nearly two years of negotiations followed, before Council settled on a common action plan for which it approached Parliament for a second consultation on the 19 November 2004.
Draftswoman's comments
Draftswoman's comments
General goal:
General goal:
Your draftswoman is in full agreement that a common Community policy is required in the field of asylum.
Your draftswoman is in full agreement that a common Community policy is required in the field of asylum.
However, she expresses serious concerns that it would fall short of accepted international legal standards and could risk breaching Member States' obligations under the European Community's Charter of Fundamental Rights in addition to international and human rights refugee law.
However, she expresses serious concerns that it would fall short of accepted international legal standards and could risk breaching Member States' obligations under the European Community's Charter of Fundamental Rights in addition to international and human rights refugee law.
In particular, she draws attention to the concept of "super-safe" third country provisions and non-suspensory appeals.
In particular, she draws attention to the concept of "super-safe" third country provisions and non-suspensory appeals.
Such a provision would allow applicants to be returned pending their appeals, and runs directly contrary to the principle of non-refoulement as laid out in the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees, which is considered the basis for international refugee law.
Such a provision would allow applicants to be returned pending their appeals, and runs directly contrary to the principle of non-refoulement as laid out in the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees, which is considered the basis for international refugee law.
There are also fears that the Directive will not provide a harmonized Community policy, but rather embeds into law the policy of each Member retaining its own practice in the field.
There are also fears that the Directive will not provide a harmonised Community policy, but rather embeds into law the policy of each Member retaining its own practice in the field.
This is evident in the numerous exceptions tabled throughout the text, allowing Members to derogate from the Directive's provisions safeguarding applicants' rights.
This is evident in the numerous exceptions tabled throughout the text, allowing Members to derogate from the Directive's provisions safeguarding applicants' rights.
Your draftswoman highlights the main areas where she fears applicants' interests are being downgraded: the right to a personal interview with a qualified interpreter, access to and allocation of resources for legal assistance, access to UNHCR and other civil society organizations working in the field, limits concerning submission of documents and rights to appeal, as well, the emphasis on the applicant's responsibility to produce relevant documents.
Your draftswoman highlights the main areas where she fears applicants' interests are being downgraded: the right to a personal interview with a qualified interpreter, access to and allocation of resources for legal assistance, access to UNHCR and other civil society organisations working in the field, limits concerning submission of documents and rights to appeal, as well, the emphasis on the applicant's responsibility to produce relevant documents.
This ignores the widespread illegal trade in trafficing, in which traffickers often force claimants to destroy all identification to avoid detection of the smugglers by law enforcement.
This ignores the widespread illegal trade in trafficking, in which traffickers often force claimants to destroy all identification to avoid detection of the smugglers by law enforcement.
Another concern is a practice in the Directive of adopting terminology which is broader and vaguer than accepted international standards.
Another concern is a practice in the Directive of adopting terminology which is broader and vaguer than accepted international standards.
Failing to guarantee an asylum process which is fair, just and efficient, due to cutting corners in administration and legal costs runs a high risk of placing the claimant's safety in jeopardy with fatal results.
Failing to guarantee an asylum process which is fair, just and efficient, due to cutting corners in administration and legal costs runs a high risk of placing the claimant's safety in jeopardy with fatal results.
Violating the principle of non-refoulement risks the Directive failing to hold in an international court of law and fails to guarantee fundamental rights.
Violating the principle of non-refoulement risks the Directive failing to hold in an international court of law and fails to guarantee fundamental rights.
Your draftswoman regrets that the Council has already reached a political agreement on the present proposal, effectively disregarding the Parliament's role in the consultation process.
Your draftswoman regrets that the Council has already reached a political agreement on the present proposal, effectively disregarding the Parliament's role in the consultation process.
She hopes that Council will respect Parliament's urgings to as soon as possible, adopt the changes as laid out in Tampere and the Hague programme.
She hopes that Council will respect Parliament's urgings to as soon as possible, adopt the changes as laid out in Tampere and the Hague programme.
Výbor pro právní záležitosti vyzývá Výbor pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci jako příslušný výbor, aby do své zprávy začlenil tyto pozměňovací návrhy:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(5) Hlavním cílem této směrnice je zavést v Evropském společenství minimální rámec pro postupy udělování a odnímání právního postavení uprchlíka , a sice v souladu s mezinárodními normami, zejména s Ženevskou úmluvou z roku 1951 a závěry z Tampere o azylovém systému.
(5) The main objective of this Directive is to introduce a minimum framework in the European Community on procedures for granting and withdrawing refugee status , keeping in line with international standards, in particular the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees and the Tampere conclusions on asylum.
In order to ensure this Directive holds under the court of law, it must be in line with the 1951 Convention and others, namely the Tampere conclusions on asylum.
In order to ensure this Directive holds under the court of law, it must be in line with the 1951 Convention and others, namely the Tampere conclusions on asylum.
(8) Tato směrnice respektuje základní práva a zachovává zásady uznané zejména v Listině základních práv Evropské unie a mezinárodními závazky, především Ženevskou úmluvou z roku 1951.
(8) This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , and by international obligations, in particular the 1951 Geneva Convention.
It must be underscored that this Directive is in keeping with international law.
It must be underscored that this Directive is in keeping with international law.
(9) Pokud jde o zacházení s osobami spadajícími do oblasti působnosti této směrnice, jsou členské státy vázány závazky, které vyplývají z nástrojů mezinárodního práva, jejichž jsou součástmi a jež zakazují diskriminaci.
(9) With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit discrimination.
(9) Pokud jde o zacházení s osobami spadajícími do oblasti působnosti této směrnice, jsou členské státy vázány závazky, které vyplývají z nástrojů mezinárodního práva, jejichž jsou součástmi a jež zakazují všechny formy diskriminace.
(9) With respect to the treatment of persons falling within the scope of this Directive, Member States are bound by obligations under instruments of international law to which they are party and which prohibit all forms of discrimination.
Je nutné jasně uvést, že při použití této směrnice jsou zakázány všechny formy diskriminace.
It needs to be stated explicitly that all forms of discrimination are prohibited in the application of the Directive.
Kromě toho by v rámci postupu posuzování žádosti o azyl mělo být žadateli běžně poskytnuto alespoň právo pobytu až do vynesení rozhodnutí rozhodovacím orgánem, přístup ke službám tlumočníka pro předložení žadatelova případu při pohovoru s úřady, možnost komunikovat se zástupcem Úřadu vysokého komisaře OSN pro uprchlíky (UNHCR) nebo s jinou organizací pracující v jeho zastoupení, právo na příslušné vyrozumění o rozhodnutí a o tom, jaké věcné a právní důvody vedly k danému rozhodnutí, možnost konzultovat právního nebo jiného poradce a právo být informován o svém právním postavení v rozhodujících momentech během řízení v jazyce, o němž lze oprávněně předpokládat, že mu žadatel rozumí.
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should normally provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can reasonably be supposed to understand.
(13) V zájmu správného uznání osob, jež potřebují ochranu jako uprchlíci ve smyslu článku 1 Ženevské úmluvy, by měl každý žadatel až na určité výjimky mít náležitý přístup k řízení, možnost spolupracovat a řádně komunikovat s příslušnými orgány tak, aby mohl předkládat důležité skutečnosti o svém případě, a mít procedurální záruky pro sledování svého případu v průběhu všech etap řízení.
(13) In the interests of a correct recognition of those persons in need of protection as refugees within the meaning of Article 1 of the Geneva Convention, every applicant should, subject to certain exceptions, have an effective access to procedures, the opportunity to co-operate and properly communicate with the competent authorities so as to present the relevant facts of his/her case and procedural guarantees to pursue his/her case at and throughout all stages of the procedure.
Kromě toho by v rámci postupu posuzování žádosti o azyl mělo být žadateli běžně poskytnuto alespoň právo pobytu až do vynesení rozhodnutí rozhodovacím orgánem, přístup ke službám tlumočníka pro předložení žadatelova případu při pohovoru s úřady, možnost komunikovat se zástupcem Úřadu vysokého komisaře OSN pro uprchlíky (UNHCR) nebo s jinou organizací pracující v jeho zastoupení, právo na příslušné vyrozumění o rozhodnutí a o tom, jaké věcné a právní důvody vedly k danému rozhodnutí, možnost konzultovat právního nebo jiného poradce a právo být informován o svém právním postavení v rozhodujících momentech během řízení v jazyce, kterému žadatel rozumí.
Moreover, the procedure in which an application for asylum is examined should provide an applicant at least with a right to stay pending a decision by the determining authority, access to the services of an interpreter for submitting his/her case if interviewed by the authorities, the opportunity to communicate with a representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) or with any organisation working on its behalf, the right to appropriate notification of a decision, a motivation of that decision in fact and in law, the opportunity to consult a legal adviser or other counsellor, and the right to be informed of his/her legal position at decisive moments in the course of the procedure, in a language he/she can understand.
In ensuring a fair process, asylum applicants should be informed in a language they can understand.
In ensuring a fair process, asylum applicants should be informed in a language they can understand.
V této souvislosti by měly členské státy po celou dobu azylového řízení, které bude v souladu s článkem 3 Úmluvy OSN o právech dítěte (CRC), přihlížet především k zájmům dítěte.
In this context, the best interests of the child should be the primary consideration of Member States throughout the whole asylum procedure, consistent with Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) .