natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
§ This contribution should increase in line with the acceleration of the Lisbon strategy.
§ This contribution should increase in line with the acceleration of the Lisbon strategy.
Each Member State should set a target to increase the proportion of cohesion spending devoted directly to competitiveness.
Each Member State should set a target to increase the proportion of cohesion spending devoted directly to competitiveness.
This target should be set by Member States above an average minimum of 60% of total cohesion spending.
This target should be set by Member States above an average minimum of 60% of total cohesion spending.
§ In the run-up to the Spring European Council each year, Member States would report on this spending to the Council and the European Parliament, as an integral part of the reporting mechanisms to comply with the agreed objectives for growth and jobs.
§ In the run-up to the Spring European Council each year, Member States would report on this spending to the Council and the European Parliament, as an integral part of the reporting mechanisms to comply with the agreed objectives for growth and jobs.
§ A similar mechanism would be established in respect of rural development .
§ A similar mechanism would be established in respect of rural development .
The result of this earmarking would be to increase the share of spending linked to the new Lisbon strategy to at least a third of the EU budget.“
The result of this earmarking would be to increase the share of spending linked to the new Lisbon strategy to at least a third of the EU budget."
Postoj Evropského parlamentu při jednáních
European Parliament's negotiating position
V odstavcích 15, 21 a 52 Bögeho usnesení se uvádí následující:
Paragraph 15, 21 and 52 of the Böge resolution read as follows:
21. domnívá se, že za účelem řešení problémů zaměstnanosti a konkurenceschopnosti ve venkovských oblastech, zejména v nových členských státech, musí restrukturalizaci společné zemědělské politiky (SZP) doprovázet podstatné zvýšení prostředků na rozvoj venkova ; [...] je toho názoru, že návrh Komise na rozpočet nového Fondu na rozvoj venkova je mimořádně omezený a představuje proto naprosté minimum;
Considers that the restructuring of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) needs to be accompanied by a substantial increase in rural development funds to address the problems of employment and competitiveness in rural areas, in particular in the new Member States ; [...] is of the opinion that the Commission's proposal for the budget of the new Rural Development Fund is extremely tight and therefore constitutes an absolute minimum;
Poznámky zpravodaje
Rapporteur's Comments
Byl kladen důraz na Lisabonskou strategii a zejména na výzkum, inovaci a infrastruktury.
The Lisbon Strategy has been emphasised and mainly research, innovation and infrastructures.
Vyčleněných 60 % celkového objemu prostředků věnovaných na politiku soudržnosti (okruh 1b) bude vyhrazeno na opatření spjatá s konkurenceschopností a především na výzkum, ale také na infrastrukturu, dálnice a letiště.
An earmarking of 60% of the overall envelope dedicated to the Cohesion Policy (Heading 1b) would be reserved for competitiveness actions and mainly research but also infrastructure, motorways and airports.
V současnosti je již přibližně 50 % finančních prostředků určeno na strukturální opatření související s konkurenceschopností.
Currently about 50% of the funding is already allocated to structural linked to competitiveness.
Není jasné, zda se to bude týkat všech nástrojů nové politiky soudržnosti, jako je sbližování, regionální konkurenceschopnost a zaměstnanost, evropská územní spolupráce a Fond soudržnosti, nebo jen některého z nich.
It is not clear whether all the instruments of the new cohesion policy: convergence, regional competitiveness and employment, European territorial cooperation and the Cohesion Fund, would be concerned or only some of them.
Tato myšlenka podporuje záměr vyjádřený Evropským parlamentem spočívající ve zvýšení podpory Lisabonské strategii.
This idea goes in the direction expressed by EP to reinforce the support for the Lisbon strategy.
Návrh však vede k několika otázkám: Lze jej považovat za zásadní změnu nebo pouze za iniciativu přikrašlující skutečnou realitu?
However, the proposal raises some questions: Can it be considered as a substantive change or only as a "window dressing" initiative?
Bude toto opatření povinné?
Will this measure be compulsory?
Bude existovat mechanismus umožňující pozastavení pomoci těm členským státům, které tento cíl nebudou mít na zřeteli?
Will there be a mechanism to suspend the aid to Member States which do not respect this target?
Jak lze zaručit ekonomickou účinnost tohoto opatření?
How can the economic efficiency of this measure be guaranteed?
Tentýž mechanismus by měl platit pro rozvoj venkova s cílovým procentem stanoveným na 30 % vyčleněných financí.
The same mechanism should apply to Rural Development with a target percentage of 30% earmarking.
To by nebylo v rozporu s postojem EP při jednáních, kdy EP podporuje větší rozvoj venkova, ovšem bez vyčlenění financí (viz výše uvedený odst.
This would not be in contradiction to EP's negotiating position, which is in favour of increasing Rural Development, although without earmarking (see para.
Výzva vyplývající z globalizace: tlumení otřesů
Meeting the challenge of globalisation: a shock absorber
Návrh Komise
Commission Proposal
„A Globalisation Adjustment Fund would offer a European response to help those adjusting to the consequences of globalisation: a sign of solidarity for the many who benefit from openness to the few who face the sudden shock of losing their job.
"A Globalisation Adjustment Fund would offer a European response to help those adjusting to the consequences of globalisation: a sign of solidarity for the many who benefit from openness to the few who face the sudden shock of losing their job.
It would provide a swift answer to one-off, clearly defined problems resulting from restructuring.
It would provide a swift answer to one-off, clearly defined problems resulting from restructuring.
No new bureaucracy is needed: existing instruments and networks could be used, but access to extra resources is necessary.
No new bureaucracy is needed: existing instruments and networks could be used, but access to extra resources is necessary.
The Fund would cover training, relocation of workers, outplacement: the costs of action to help find a new job.
The Fund would cover training, relocation of workers, outplacement: the costs of action to help find a new job.
Clear criteria on the nature of the crisis and the scale of the eligible costs will be set out.
Clear criteria on the nature of the crisis and the scale of the eligible costs will be set out.
Not all restructuring would qualify: this would be a crisis mechanism to be used only to address significant economic and social shocks related to globalisation.
Not all restructuring would qualify: this would be a crisis mechanism to be used only to address significant economic and social shocks related to globalisation.
It should only intervene if a threshold is reached, defined in terms of the proportion of workers hit by redundancy in the sector and the region concerned, and the local jobless rate.
It should only intervene if a threshold is reached, defined in terms of the proportion of workers hit by redundancy in the sector and the region concerned, and the local jobless rate.
To be cost-effective, this instrument will be delivered through existing Structural Fund instruments and using the same rules.
To be cost-effective, this instrument will be delivered through existing Structural Fund instruments and using the same rules.
This resource would lie outside the financial framework (as already the case for the EU Solidarity Fund) and would be mobilised only when needed.
This resource would lie outside the financial framework (as already the case for the EU Solidarity Fund) and would be mobilised only when needed.
Needless to say, the decision on whether to use this option would rest with Parliament and Council.“
Needless to say, the decision on whether to use this option would rest with Parliament and Council."
Usnesení Evropského parlamentu (viz odst.
The European Parliament's resolution (see par.
46 v příloze) předpokládá různé formy pružnosti, které by reagovaly na různé potřeby (rezerva na konkurenceschopnost, rezerva na soudržnost, rezerva na naléhavé případy, rezerva na solidaritu, rezerva na záruky za úvěry a rezerva na pružnost).
46 in annex) foresees different kinds of flexibilities to cover different needs (Reserve for Competitiveness, Reserve for Cohesion, Emergency Aid Reserve, Solidarity Reserve, Reserve for Loans Guarantee and Flexibility Reserve).
Všechny tyto formy lze použít poté, co o nich rozhodne EP a Rada, a v případě potřeby budou financovány mimo limity finančního výhledu navýšením finančních prostředků a na základě rozpočtové kázně (viz odst.
All of them are to be mobilised after decision by EP and Council and are to be financed, when necessary, outside the ceiling of the Financial Perspective by an increase in funding and based on budgetary discipline (see par.
45 v příloze).
45 in Annex).
Nový návrh Komise zřejmě nahrazuje původní Fond pro úpravu růstu, který měl být financován z nevyužitých finančních prostředků; novému nástroji dodává navíc jiný rozsah působnosti.
The new proposal by the Commission is apparently replacing the initial Growth Adjustment Fund which was to be financed from unused appropriations and has given another scope to the new instrument.
Zpravodaj je ochoten ztotožnit se s cílem formulovaným Komisí za účelem zajištění mechanismu pružnosti, nesouhlasí však s omezením na jeden okruh (1b).
The rapporteur can share the objective expressed by the Commission to provide for a flexibility mechanism, although he disagrees with the limitation to one heading (1b).
Evropský parlament rozhodně nepřijme interinstitucionální dohodu předpokládající mechanismus pružnosti omezený pouze na jeden okruh, zvláště pokud je spojen s omezujícím finančním rámcem.
The European Parliament will certainly not accept an Inter-institutional Agreement with a flexibility mechanism reduced to one heading, especially if combined with a restrictive financial framework.
Konsolidace současných zemědělských reforem
Consolidating the current agricultural reforms
„In 2002, an agreement was reached on a budget for the Common Agricultural Policy until 2013, going hand in hand with a fundamental reform of agricultural policy, which is still being implemented and spread to the full range of sectors.
"In 2002, an agreement was reached on a budget for the Common Agricultural Policy until 2013, going hand in hand with a fundamental reform of agricultural policy, which is still being implemented and spread to the full range of sectors.
This agreement should be fully respected.
This agreement should be fully respected.
One of the key reforms was to introduce more dynamism into agricultural spending by shifting funds from direct aids for farmers to rural development.
One of the key reforms was to introduce more dynamism into agricultural spending by shifting funds from direct aids for farmers to rural development.
Increasing the pace of these shifts by 1 per cent a year from 2009 would release extra funds to have a direct impact on growth and jobs in rural communities.
Increasing the pace of these shifts by 1 per cent a year from 2009 would release extra funds to have a direct impact on growth and jobs in rural communities.
It would also boost the funding for the Union’s innovative conservation network, NATURA 2000.“
It would also boost the funding for the Union ’s innovative conservation network, NATURA 2000."
I ohledně dodržování dohody z roku 2002 je postoj EP při jednáních zcela jasný.
The EP negotiating position is also very clear concerning the respect of the 2002 agreement.
Lze připomenout, že v usnesení EP byla navržena možnost pokrýt náklady na zemědělství Bulharska a Rumunska do výše tak zvaného „bruselského stropu“.
It can be reminded that the EP resolution has proposed the possibility to cover the cost for agriculture for Bulgaria and Romania within the so called "Brussels ceiling".
49. [...]; je znepokojen, jelikož bude-li chybět politická a finanční dohoda, financování opatření souvisejících s trhem a přímých plateb pro Bulharsko a Rumunsko přesahujících strop dohodnutý Radou v roce 2002 pro EU-25 je i nadále nejisté, a navrhuje proto, že za účelem zaručení podpory na úrovni stanovené rozhodnutím Evropské rady z října 2002 by měla být v rámci EU-15 zavedena možnost postupně zaváděného povinného spolufinancování, pokud budou potřeby vyšší, než se předpokládalo;
49. [...]; is concerned that, in the absence of political and financial agreement, the funding of market-related measures and direct payments for Bulgaria and Romania above the ceiling agreed by the Council in 2002 for EU-25 remains in doubt, and proposes therefore that, in order to guarantee the level of support set by the decision of the European Council of October 2002, the possibility of a phasing-in process of compulsory co-financing should be initiated within EU-15 if the needs exceed the forecasts;
V odstavci 22 se uvádí:
22 reads as follows:
22. [...] v tomto kontextu trvá na právně závazném mechanismu, který by u programu Natura 2000 zaručil řádné provádění a financování ze strany EU ve výši odhadovaného příspěvku EU k celkové plánované částce, která činí přibližně 6,1 miliard EUR na EU-25 ročně; trvá na tom, že částka 21 miliard EUR na program Natura 2000 by proto měla být ve finančním výhledu v příslušných oblastech vyčleněna („vymezena“); vyzývá k financování opatření za účelem provádění programu Natura 2000 v rámci okruhu 2 finančního výhledu; vyzývá k finacování činností a správy programu Natura 2000, které v rámci programu Life+ nelze financovat jinými nástroji; v tomto kontextu vyzývá Komisi k přezkoumání případného zařazení programu Natura 2000 pod jiné fondy;
22. [...] insists in this context on a legally binding mechanism which guarantees proper implementation and EU funding for Natura 2000 at the level of the EU's estimated contribution to the envisaged overall amount, which is approximately EUR 6.1 billion for the EU-25 per year; insists that an amount of EUR 21 billion for Natura 2000 should therefore be earmarked ("ring-fenced") in the Financial Perspective within the respective areas; calls for the funding of measures to implement Natura 2000 under Heading 2 of the Financial Perspective; calls for the funding of Natura 2000 activities and management which cannot be financed by other instruments within the Life+ programme; calls on the Commission in this context to examine the possible integration of Natura 2000 in other funds;
Zrychlení regulace (přechod mezi tržními opatřeními a podporou příjmu a rozvojem venkova), ačkoliv na finanční podmínky bude mít omezený vliv, rozšíří spolufinancovanou část zemědělství, ale současně sníží přímé podpory zemědělcům.
The acceleration of the modulation (shift between market measures and income support and rural development), even if it will have a limited effect on financial terms, will increase the part of co-financing of agriculture but at the same time it will reduce the direct support to farmers.
Zpravodaj souhlasí s tím, že Lisabonská strategie by neměla být omezena na okruhy 1a a 1b.
The rapporteur agrees on the fact that the Lisbon strategy should not be limited to heading 1a and 1b.
Má, nicméně, za to, že – jak zdůrazňuje postoj EP při jednáních – bez dodatečného spolufinancování by z návrhu Komise vyplývalo snížení příjmů pro zemědělce EU.
However, he considers that, as stressed in the EP's negotiating position, without additional co-financing, the Commission's proposal would imply a reduction of revenue for the EU farmers.
Modernizace rozpočtu: plán k přehodnocení
Modernising the budget: a roadmap for review
„There is a broad consensus on the need for a fundamental review of the EU budget.
"There is a broad consensus on the need for a fundamental review of the EU budget.
This will take time, but it also needs to be carefully planned: the European Council should set out the precise parameters and the timetable for this review.
This will take time, but it also needs to be carefully planned: the European Council should set out the precise parameters and the timetable for this review.
There is already a built-in agenda of sectoral reviews pre-programmed for the coming years: for the operation of the CAP in 2008, and for the Lisbon strategy in the same year.
There is already a built-in agenda of sectoral reviews pre-programmed for the coming years: for the operation of the CAP in 2008, and for the Lisbon strategy in the same year.
But a more over-arching review is also needed.
But a more over-arching review is also needed.
The Union should commit itself to carrying out a comprehensive review of all aspects of the organisation of the EU budget – expenditure, revenue and structure – with a view to ensuring that the budget is equipped to respond to the challenges of the future.
The Union should commit itself to carrying out a comprehensive review of all aspects of the organisation of the EU budget – expenditure, revenue and structure – with a view to ensuring that the budget is equipped to respond to the challenges of the future.
The review would be launched by a White Paper on modernisation of spending and revenue to be put forward by the Commission early in 2009.“
The review would be launched by a White Paper on modernisation of spending and revenue to be put forward by the Commission early in 2009."
V průběhu období se plánuje několik přezkoumání pro oblast zemědělství a Lisabonské strategie.
Several reviews are foreseen during the period for agriculture, for Lisbon.
Komise se domnívá, že celkové přezkoumání by se mělo odehrát ve dvou fázích a bez účasti členských států:
The Commission considers that a global review should take place in two phases and without involving the Member States:
a. na začátku roku 2009: seznámení s Bílou knihou, po němž bude následovat debata v orgánech (EP a Rada)
a. early 2009: presentation of a White Paper followed by a debate in the institutions (EP and Council)
2010–2013: druhá fáze provádění za působnosti nově zvoleného Evropského parlamentu a nově jmenované Komise.
2010-2013: Second phase for implementation under the mandates of a newly elected European Parliament and newly appointed Commission.
33. konstatuje, že Komise předložila finanční výhled na sedm let; z důvodu demokratické spolehlivosti a odpovědnosti opět zdůrazňuje svůj postoj podporující souběžnost finančního výhledu s pětiletými mandáty Evropského parlamentu a Komise a připomíná, že Ústava definuje minimálně pětiletý víceletý finanční rámec, což by umožnilo koordinaci s funkčním obdobím Komise a Evropského parlamentu; poukazuje na skutečnost, že délka platnosti legislativních návrhů by na časovém rozvržení finančního výhledu nemusela záviset
Notes that the Commission has proposed a financial framework of 7 years' duration ; reiterates, for reasons of democratic responsibility and accountability, its position in favour of a parallelism between the duration of the Financial Perspective and the five-year mandates of the European Parliament and of the Commission, and recalls that the Constitution provides for a duration for the future MFF of a minimum of five years, which would allow for co-ordination with the terms of office of the Commission and of the European Parliament; points out that the duration of the legislative proposals could remain independent from the timeframe of the Financial Perspective
Zpravodaj zdůrazňuje, že návrh, který by nové Komisi umožnil navrhnout úpravy v Bílé knize a nově zvolenému Parlamentu podílet se na rozhodnutích o současném finančním výhledu, by na finanční výhled neměl žádný vliv.
The rapporteur underlines that such a proposal which would allow the new Commission to propose some adjustments in the White Paper and the newly elected Parliament to have a say on the current Financial Perspective would have no effect on the Financial Perspective.
Navržené přezkoumání jako nástroj, kterým by v případě potřeby bylo možné opět definovat směr sledovaný finančním výhledem či jej upravit, nefunguje.
The proposed review is an ineffective tool to be able to re-orient or adjust the FP if necessary.
EP by dal přednost skutečné revizní doložce nebo kratším období platnosti.
EP would prefer a genuine revision clause or a shorter period.
Tento návrh současně sníží důvěryhodnost finančního výhledu po roce 2010.
At the same time this proposal will reduce the credibility of the Financial Perspective after 2010.
Rozšíření demokratické kontroly a soudržnosti našich vnějších opatření
V. Increasing democratic scrutiny and coherence of our external action
"In the past weeks the Union has made a series of bold commitments to promote the Millennium Development Goals.
"In the past weeks the Union has made a series of bold commitments to promote the Millennium Development Goals.
These commitments have a price and we have decided to pay the bill.
These commitments have a price and we have decided to pay the bill.
Now it will be for the Union to deliver.
Now it will be for the Union to deliver.
The level discussed in the European Council are not sufficient to meet these commitments.
The level discussed in the European Council are not sufficient to meet these commitments.
On the other hand, it cannot be envisaged to withdraw our commitments, or delay their implementation, especially regarding the poorest countries.
On the other hand, it cannot be envisaged to withdraw our commitments, or delay their implementation, especially regarding the poorest countries.
The split in EU spending between mainstream budget spending and the European Development Fund (EDF) is detrimental to the coherence of the EU external action.
The split in EU spending between mainstream budget spending and the European Development Fund (EDF) is detrimental to the coherence of the EU external action.
'Budgetisation' of the EDF remains the best option.
'Budgetisation' of the EDF remains the best option.
If this proves impossible, a step towards it would be to integrate the EDF into the traditional mechanisms for external spending, while retaining a separate repartition key during a transitional period.
If this proves impossible, a step towards it would be to integrate the EDF into the traditional mechanisms for external spending, while retaining a separate repartition key during a transitional period.
Such a compromise would require that appropriate provisions would guarantee the European Parliament’s rights in this area.
Such a compromise would require that appropriate provisions would guarantee the European Parliament’s rights in this area.
In order to preserve the proper role of the European Parliament in the simplification and enhanced effectiveness of the Union’s external action, a specific inter-institutional agreement should be agreed to ensure a proper role for Parliament in policy definition for external spending."
In order to preserve the proper role of the European Parliament in the simplification and enhanced effectiveness of the Union ’s external action, a specific inter-institutional agreement should be agreed to ensure a proper role for Parliament in policy definition for external spending"
Pokud jde o ERF, podporuje Evropský parlament jeho začlenění do rozpočtu, ne však na úkor jiných (včetně nových) politik.
Concerning EDF, the European Parliament's position is in favour of 'budgetisation' but not to the detriment of other (including new) policies.
49 zní takto:
49 reads:
49 [...] připomíná, že Evropský parlament důrazně podporuje začlenění ERF do souhrnného rozpočtu na základě zásady jednotnosti rozpočtu a z důvodu transparentnosti, podotýká však, že z finančního hlediska by toto začlenění nemělo ohrozit jiné politiky ; [...]
49 [...] recalls that the European Parliament has strongly supported the integration of the EDF into the general budget on the basis of the principle of the unity of the budget and for reasons of transparency, but observes that, in financial terms, the budgetisation should not jeopardise other policies ; [...]