natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
As a new institution entering its first full budgetary year in 2005, the EDPS shows the biggest increase over 2004 (127% when comparing the original budgets or 48,8% if the AB for 2004 is adopted without modification).
As a new institution entering its first full budgetary year in 2005, the EDPS shows the biggest increase over 2004 (127% when comparing the original budgets or 48,8% if the AB for 2004 is adopted without modification).
Nevertheless, the estimate for 2005 is higher than foreseen in the report by the Secretaries General of July 2003, which estimated the appropriations at EUR 2,5 million for 2005 and at EUR 2,6 million for 2006.
Nevertheless, the estimate for 2005 is higher than foreseen in the report by the Secretaries General of July 2003, which estimated the appropriations at EUR 2,5 million for 2005 and at EUR 2,6 million for 2006.
The EDPS requests the creation of 4 new temporary posts (2 A*, 1 B* and C* post).
The EDPS requests the creation of 4 new temporary posts (2 A*, 1 B* and C* post).
22 July 2004
22 July 2004
1.1 In the preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2005, as presented by the Commission, the administrative expenditure of the institutions (heading 5) was estimated to amount to EUR 6 360 million (including staff contributions to the pension scheme of EUR 175 million), which represents an increase of 3,9% compared to 2004.
1.1 In the preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2005, as presented by the Commission, the administrative expenditure of the institutions (heading 5) was estimated to amount to EUR 6 360 million (including staff contributions to the pension scheme of EUR 175 million), which represents an increase of 3,9% compared to 2004.
1.2 The PDB foresees no margin for heading 5 in 2005, i.e. the preliminary draft budgets for the institutions equal the ceiling foreseen for administrative expenditure.
1.2 The PDB foresees no margin for heading 5 in 2005, i.e. the preliminary draft budgets for the institutions equal the ceiling foreseen for administrative expenditure.
Taking into account the final Council estimate, the sum of the estimates by the institutions, however, amounts to a negative margin of EUR 28,8 million instead of the zero margin published in the PDB (see the table with the amended PDB figures below).
Taking into account the final Council estimate, the sum of the estimates by the institutions, however, amounts to a negative margin of EUR 28,8 million instead of the zero margin published in the PDB (see the table with the amended PDB figures below).
SUMMARY TABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE
SUMMARY TABLE: ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE
2004 budget (1)
2004 budget (1)
Amended PDB 2005 (1)
Amended PDB 2005 (1)
Draft 2005 budget (1)
Draft 2005 budget (1)
Section I - Parliament
Section I - Parliament
1 231 000 000
1 231 000 000
1 272 000 000
1 272 000 000
Section II - Council
Section II - Council
541 916 200
541 916 200
579 800 000 (2)
579 800 000 (2)
568 343 402
568 343 402
Section III - Commission
Section III - Commission
2 778 081 080
2 778 081 080
2 888 030 216
2 888 030 216
2 838 081 329
2 838 081 329
75 029 844
75 029 844
79 369 500
79 369 500
78 142 453
78 142 453
42 520 000
42 520 000
47 331 000
47 331 000
46 617 465
46 617 465
21 603 000
21 603 000
24 279 364
24 279 364
23 899 704
23 899 704
31 818 000
31 818 000
30 679 000
30 679 000
30 112 870
30 112 870
59 798 000
59 798 000
56 552 000
56 552 000
55 580 834
55 580 834
23 327 000
23 327 000
22 767 000
22 767 000
22 310 397
22 310 397
815 076 200
815 076 200
865 927 000
865 927 000
Total Section III
Total Section III
3 847 253 124
3 847 253 124
4 014 935 080
4 014 935 080
3 960 672 052
3 960 672 052
Section IV - Court of Justice
Section IV - Court of Justice
235 041 565
235 041 565
233 550 850
233 550 850
227 196 872
227 196 872
Section V - Court of Auditors
Section V - Court of Auditors
96 925 410
96 925 410
110 364 700
110 364 700
106 740 579
106 740 579
Section VI - Economic and Social Committee
Section VI - Economic and Social Committee
102 709 246
102 709 246
105 786 938
105 786 938
103 430 125
103 430 125
Section VII - Committee of the Regions
Section VII - Committee of the Regions
59 413 031
59 413 031
61 926 044
61 926 044
59 875 396
59 875 396
Section VIII a - Ombudsman
Section VIII a - Ombudsman
5 782 968
5 782 968
7 435 858
7 435 858
7 018 926
7 018 926
Section VIII b - EDPS
Section VIII b - EDPS
1 272 000
1 272 000
2 889 142
2 889 142
2 842 305
2 842 305
Total other institutions
Total other institutions
2 274 060 420
2 274 060 420
2 373 753 532
2 373 753 532
2 347 447 605
2 347 447 605
6 121 313 544
6 121 313 544
6 388 688 612
6 388 688 612
6 308 119 657
6 308 119 657
Financial Perspective (3)
Financial Perspective (3)
6 157 000 000
6 157 000 000
6 360 000 000
6 360 000 000
Available margin
Available margin
35 686 456
35 686 456
-28 688 612
-28 688 612
51 880 343
51 880 343
(1) Including amounts entered in Chapter 100 and Council final estimate.
(1) Including amounts entered in Chapter 100 and Council final estimate.
(2) Council final estimate
(2) Council final estimate
(3) Including EUR 175 million for staff contributions to the pensions scheme.
(3) Including EUR 175 million for staff contributions to the pensions scheme.
Council's approach in the Draft Budget for 2005
Council's approach in the Draft Budget for 2005
In the Draft Budget, the Council left a margin of some EUR 51,9 million.
In the Draft Budget, the Council left a margin of some EUR 51,9 million.
This corresponds to 3,1% increase over 2004 budget.
This corresponds to 3,1% increase over 2004 budget.
In other words, the real difference between the PDB (EUR -28,8 million margin instead of zero margin after the Council estimates have been taken into account) and the DB (margin of EUR 51,8 million) is around EUR 80 million.
In other words, the real difference between the PDB (EUR -28,8 million margin instead of zero margin after the Council estimates have been taken into account) and the DB (margin of EUR 51,8 million) is around EUR 80 million.
In order to create a margin of some EUR 51,9 million under heading 5, the Council has reduced the current expenditure of the Commission and the other institutions by 1,5% in average compared to the PDB.
In order to create a margin of some EUR 51,9 million under heading 5, the Council has reduced the current expenditure of the Commission and the other institutions by 1,5% in average compared to the PDB.
The reduction is targeted mainly at information technologies and interinstitutional co-operation.
The reduction is targeted mainly at information technologies and interinstitutional co-operation.
The Council has accepted new posts requested for enlargement and certain new tasks.
The Council has accepted new posts requested for enlargement and certain new tasks.
A reduction of 5% on appropriations for these accepted posts is applied.
A reduction of 5% on appropriations for these accepted posts is applied.
In addition, a minimum standard flat rate is fixed at 4% to take into account the current vacancy rate.
In addition, a minimum standard flat rate is fixed at 4% to take into account the current vacancy rate.
The Council has adopted post conversions and upgradings, in particular related to career development under the enw staff regulations.
The Council has adopted post conversions and upgradings, in particular related to career development under the enw staff regulations.
Draft Budget 2005
Draft Budget 2005
Total increase 2004/DB 2005 in %
Total increase 2004/DB 2005 in %
New posts in DB
New posts in DB
3.1 The Council has, in accordance with the gentlemen's agreement, approved the Parliament's estimate unmodified.
3.1 The Council has, in accordance with the gentlemen's agreement, approved the Parliament's estimate unmodified.
4.1 Contrary to the other institutions, the Council does not submit its estimates to the Commission.
4.1 Contrary to the other institutions, the Council does not submit its estimates to the Commission.
4.2 In its Draft Budget, the Council has cut its own budget by EUR 11,4 million compared to its final estimates, but the increase compared to 2004 remains relatively high at 4,9% and well above the average of 3,1% for heading 5.
4.2 In its Draft Budget, the Council has cut its own budget by EUR 11,4 million compared to its final estimates, but the increase compared to 2004 remains relatively high at 4,9% and well above the average of 3,1% for heading 5.
4.3 With regard to staff levels for its own administrative budget, the Council:
4.3 With regard to staff levels for its own administrative budget, the Council:
· approved the posts requested for enlargement and, given the expenditure laid down for the new tasks of the Secretariat, some other posts.
· approved the posts requested for enlargement and, given the expenditure laid down for the new tasks of the Secretariat, some other posts.
It has agreed to create 119 new posts (2 A*12, 13 A*7, 13 A*6, 11 A*5, 33 B*3, 47 C*1) and to transfer 1 C*4 post to the European Administrative School (EAS);
It has agreed to create 119 new posts (2 A*12, 13 A*7, 13 A*6, 11 A*5, 33 B*3, 47 C*1) and to transfer 1 C*4 post to the European Administrative School (EAS);
· approved 155 transformations for career development;
· approved 155 transformations for career development;
· rejected the request for 2 A*7, 3 A*6, 3 A*5, 6 B*3 and 11 C*1.
· rejected the request for 2 A*7, 3 A*6, 3 A*5, 6 B*3 and 11 C*1.
Total change 2004/DB 2005 in %
Total change 2004/DB 2005 in %
5.1 With regard to staff levels for the Court of Justice, the Council:
5.1 With regard to staff levels for the Court of Justice, the Council:
· approved the creation of 10 new posts (1 A*15 and 9 B*3) for the translation service and the upgrading of 1 A*14 to A*15; this includes 2 posts already approved in Council 1st reading in 2004.
· approved the creation of 10 new posts (1 A*15 and 9 B*3) for the translation service and the upgrading of 1 A*14 to A*15; this includes 2 posts already approved in Council 1st reading in 2004.
· approved 145 transformations for career development;
· approved 145 transformations for career development;
· rejected the request for 1 A*9 T, 10 A*6, 1 B*5 T, 21 B*3, 33 C*1.
· rejected the request for 1 A*9 T, 10 A*6, 1 B*5 T, 21 B*3, 33 C*1.
6.1 With regard to staff levels for the Court of Auditors, the Council:
6.1 With regard to staff levels for the Court of Auditors, the Council:
· approved the creation of 19 new posts (8 A*9, 8 A*6 and 3 C*1) including the deletion 1 A*4 T;
· approved the creation of 19 new posts (8 A*9, 8 A*6 and 3 C*1) including the deletion 1 A*4 T;
· approved 30 transformations for career development;
· approved 30 transformations for career development;
· approved 9 upgradings (1 A*14 to A*15, 5 A*8 to A*10, 2 C*2 to C*4 and 1 C*2 to C*3);
· approved 9 upgradings (1 A*14 to A*15, 5 A*8 to A*10, 2 C*2 to C*4 and 1 C*2 to C*3);
· rejected the request for 6 A*9, 6 A*6, 3 B*3, 7 C*1 and 1 C*4 T).
· rejected the request for 6 A*9, 6 A*6, 3 B*3, 7 C*1 and 1 C*4 T).
7.1 With regard to staff levels for the Economic and Social Committee, the Council:
7.1 With regard to staff levels for the Economic and Social Committee, the Council:
· approved the creation of 5 A*5 T, all language-related posts;
· approved the creation of 5 A*5 T, all language-related posts;
· accepted the upgrading of 1 A*11 T to A*12 T;
· accepted the upgrading of 1 A*11 T to A*12 T;
· approved 78 transformations for career development;
· approved 78 transformations for career development;
· accepted the transformation of a temporary into a permanent post (1 A*8 T to A*8 P) and the extension up to 31.12.2005 of the existing contracts of 1 A*8 T and 1 B*5;
· accepted the transformation of a temporary into a permanent post (1 A*8 T to A*8 P) and the extension up to 31.12.2005 of the existing contracts of 1 A*8 T and 1 B*5;
· rejected the request for 3 A*5, 1 B*3, 8 C*1, 1 C*1 T.
· rejected the request for 3 A*5, 1 B*3, 8 C*1, 1 C*1 T.
8.1 With regard to staff levels for the Committee of the Regions, the Council:
8.1 With regard to staff levels for the Committee of the Regions, the Council:
· approved the creation of 3 A*5 T, all language-related posts
· approved the creation of 3 A*5 T, all language-related posts
· accepted the extension up to 31.12.2005 of 1 existing contract for 1 A*11 T;
· accepted the extension up to 31.12.2005 of 1 existing contract for 1 A*11 T;
· accepted 17 transformations for career development;
· accepted 17 transformations for career development;
· rejected the request for 1 A*15, 1 A*9, 9 A*6, 1 A*6 T, 2 B*3, 8 C*1, 2 C*1 T.
· rejected the request for 1 A*15, 1 A*9, 9 A*6, 1 A*6 T, 2 B*3, 8 C*1, 2 C*1 T.
Total increase 2004/DB 2005in %
Total increase 2004/DB 2005in %
9.1 With regard to staff levels for the Ombudsman, the Council:
9.1 With regard to staff levels for the Ombudsman, the Council:
· approved the creation of 4 new posts (3 A*6 T and 1 B*4 T);
· approved the creation of 4 new posts (3 A*6 T and 1 B*4 T);
· approved 7 transformations for career development;
· approved 7 transformations for career development;
· accepted the transformations of permanent into temporary posts (1 C*2 P to C*2 T and 2 B*6 P to B*6 T);
· accepted the transformations of permanent into temporary posts (1 C*2 P to C*2 T and 2 B*6 P to B*6 T);
· rejected the request for 4 A*6 T, 2 B*3 T and 3 C*1 T.
· rejected the request for 4 A*6 T, 2 B*3 T and 3 C*1 T.
10.1 With regard to staff levels for the EDPS, the Council:
10.1 With regard to staff levels for the EDPS, the Council:
· approved the creation of 4 new posts (2 A*5 T, 1 B*4 T and 1 C*1 T);
· approved the creation of 4 new posts (2 A*5 T, 1 B*4 T and 1 C*1 T);
· approved 6 transformations for career development.
· approved 6 transformations for career development.
pro Rozpočtový výbor
for the Committee on Budgets
k návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005
Navrhovatel: David W.
Draftsman: David W. Martin
Výbor pro mezinárodní obchod vyzývá Rozpočtový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení o oddílu III, rozpočet Komise, začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incoporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution on Section III, Commission Budget:
Učinila tak i v loňském roce, kdy Parlament také obnovil částku na úroveň předběžného návrhu rozpočtu Komise.
They did the same last year, also last year Parliament reinstated the Commission preliminary draft budget figures.
Nárůst výdajů na zaměstnance souvisí částečně s otevřením nových delegací Komise v Moldavsku, Bělorusku a v dalších zemích.
The rise in staff expenditures is partly related to the opening of new Commission delegations in Moldova, Belorussia and other states.
Zaměstnanec delegace, který se bude zabývat otázkami obchodu, bude placen z rozpočtu GŘ pro obchod – bude tedy potřeba více peněz než loni.
The person dealing with trade issues in such a delegation will be paid from DG Trade's budget - thus the need for more money than last year.
Výbor pro mezinárodní obchod vyzývá Rozpočtový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení k oddílu I, rozpočet Evropského parlamentu, začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incoporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution on Section I, Budget of the European Parliament:
Tyto konference jsou pro poslance z celého světa příležitostí k diskusi o světovém obchodu a o nejnovějším vývoji jednání WTO.
These conferences give Parliamentarians from all over the world the opportunity to discuss World Trade and the latest developments of the WTO negotiations.
Pomáhají parlamentům ve všech světadílech rozvíjet jejich schopnosti v této oblasti;
They help Parliaments on all continents to develop their capabilities in this area;
Částečně z rozpočtu Evropské komise, položky rozpočtu B7‑850, třebaže tato položka je určena také na jiné výdaje.
It is partly financed by the Budget of the European Commission, budget line B7-850, although this line covers other expenditures also.
Další prostředky plynou z různých položek rozpočtu EP, které jsou určené na delegace nebo mezinárodní konference apod.;
Further funding comes from different lines within the EP's budget that are intended for delegations or international conferences and suchlike;
5. požaduje, aby byla vytvořena položka rozpočtu s částkou 500 000 eur na parlamentní dimenzi WTO.
Requests that a budget line with EUR 500.000 for the Parliamentary dimension of the WTO be established.
Tato položka je potřebná pro větší průhlednost výdajů souvisejících s parlamentní dimenzí WTO.
This budget line is needed to bring more transparency into spending relating to the Parliamentary dimension of the WTO.
Návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005: oddíl III – Komise, oddíl I – Evropský parlament
The draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005 : Section III - Commission , Section I - European Parliament
STANOVISKO výborU pro ÚSTAVNÍ záležitosti
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs
STRUČNÉ ODŮVODNĚNÍ
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
Rozpočtový rok 2005 bude prvním rozpočtem, který má zahrnout 25 členských států po celý rok.
The financial year 2005 will be the first budget to cover 25 Member States over the whole year.
Proto je nutné vyvinout ve všech oblastech politiky velké úsilí s cílem přispět k rychlé integraci nových členských států a seznámit je s vnitřním chodem Evropské unie, zejména s institucionálním systémem a rozhodovacími mechanismy.
It is thus essential in all policy fields to make strong efforts to contribute to a rapid integration of the new Member States and to acquaint them with the inner workings of the European Union, in particular its institutional order and decision mechanisms.
Mimo jiné přijala Mezivládní konference (MVK) dne 18. června 2004 návrh Ústavy pro Evropu.
Moreover, a draft constitution for Europe has been adopted by the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) on 18 June 2004.
Po provedení závěrečného právně-jazykového ověření znění bude muset být Ústava předložena a objasněna občanům členských států, zejména ve vzrůstajícím počtu států, které vyzvou své občany, aby Ústavu schválili v referendu.
After the final legal and linguistic verification of the text, that constitution will have to be presented and explained to the citizens of the Member States, especially in the growing number of countries who will call on their citizens to approve it in a referendum.
Také rozprava o budoucím finančním rámci po roce 2006, kterou zahájila v únoru 2004 Komise, ovlivní hladký průběh jednání o rozpočtu.
Finally, the debate on the future financial framework post 2006, which the Commission launched in February 2004, will influence the smooth progress of the budget negotiations.
Celkový strop položek plateb na rok 2005 představuje v předběžném návrhu rozpočtu částku 114,2 miliard EUR, která odpovídá 1,8 % HND.
In the Preliminary Draft Budget, the total ceiling of payment appropriations for 2005 is EUR 114,2 billion, which corresponds to 1,08 % of the GNI.
Strop pro vnitřní politiky (okruh 3 finančních výhledů) se nominálně zvyšuje o 290 milionů EUR, tj. o 3,3 % oproti rozpočtu na rok 2004.
The ceiling of the internal policies (heading 3 of the financial perspectives) in nominal terms increases by EUR 290 million, i.e. + 3,3 % against the budget 2004.
K výrazným zvýšením částek oproti rozpočtu na rok 2004 dochází v jedné z oblastí politik důležitých pro tento výbor, tj. výchova a kultura (o 37 milionů EUR).
Significant increases compared to the 2004 budget can be found in one of the policy areas important for this Committee, i.e. education and culture (+EUR 37 million).
Podle systému sestavování rozpočtu podle jednotlivých činností jsou rozpočtové body, které jsou ve středu zájmu Výboru pro ústavní záležitosti, v hlavě 15 (výchova a kultura), v hlavě 16 (tisk a komunikace) a v hlavě 25 (koordinace politiky Komise a právní poradenství).
According to the activity based budget classification, the budget items of interest to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs can be found in Titles 15 (education and culture), 16 (press and communication) and 25 (Commission's policy coordination and legal advice).
V roce 2005 je třeba vynaložit velké úsilí na objasnění podstaty a významu budoucí transformace EU jejím občanům.
In 2005, every effort must be made to bring home to Union citizens the importance of the issues at stake in the forthcoming transformations of the European Union.
Jinak hrozí prohloubení deziluze vůči Evropské unii, která se již projevila při volbách v minulých letech.
Otherwise, there is a clear risk to deepen the disenchantment vis-à-vis the European Union that has become apparent in a number of polls over the past few years.
Výbor pro ústavní záležitosti se tedy zaměří na následující body:
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs will thus focus on the following aspects:
– informační sítě;
– information relays;
– program Prince;
– the Prince programme;
– akční program Jean Monnet (evropská integrace na univerzitách);
– the Jean Monnet action programme (European integration in universities);
– dotace pro subjekty, které jsou aktivní v oblasti ústavních záležitostí, zejména Univerzita College of Europe (15 02 01 02), Evropský univerzitní institut ve Florencii (15 02 01 03), Akademie evropského práva v Trevíru (15 02 01 03), Evropský institut veřejné správy v Maastrichtu (15 02 01 05), sdružení „Naše Evropa“, granty evropským skupinám expertů a organizacím prosazujícím myšlenku Evropy (15 06 01 03), podpora domů Jean Monnet a Robert Schuman (15 06 01 06);
– subsidies for bodies active in the constitutional field, notably the College of Europe (15 02 01 02), the European University Institute in Florence (15 02 01 03), the European Law Academy in Trier (15 02 01 03), the European Institute of Public Administration in Maastricht (15 02 01 05), "Our Europe" Association, grants to European think tanks and organisations advancing the idea of Europe (15 06 01 03), the Jean Monnet and Robert Schuman House (15 06 01 06);
– internetový přenos a archivování záznamů z plenárních zasedání a jiných významných veřejných schůzí.
– Webcasting and storage of plenary sessions and other important public meetings.
V návrhu rozpočtu přijatém Radou nebyly s výjimkou bodu 16 05 01 (viz níže) změněny žádné částky, které ve svém předběžném návrhu rozpočtu (PNR) navrhla Komise.
With the exception of item 16 05 01 (see below) the draft budget adopted by the Council has not changed the amounts proposed by the Commission in its preliminary draft budget (PDB).
INFORMAČNÍ KANCELÁŘE (16 05 01)
INFORMATION OUTLETS (16 05 01)
Jak již bylo uvedeno dříve, je třeba, aby byl návrh Ústavy pro Evropu šířen a objasňován veřejnosti, zejména s ohledem na referenda, která proběhnou nejméně v 11 členských státech.
As noted above, the draft Constitution for Europe must be disseminated and explained to the public, not least in the context of referenda to be organised in at least 11 Member States.
Silná podpora práce informačních sítí je tedy nezbytně nutná.
Strong support for the work of the information relays is therefore essential.
Komise ve svém PNR zapsala do bodu rozpočtu 16 05 01 částku 17,75 milionu EUR, což znamená zvýšení o 3,8 %.
In its PDB, the Commission has entered an appropriation of EUR 17.75 million against item 16 05 01, an increase of 3,8%.
Výbor pro ústavní záležitosti považuje tuto částku za přiměřenou.
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs regards this amount as appropriate.
V návrhu rozpočtu se však navrhuje návrat k částce 17,1 milionu uvedené v rozpočtu na rok 2004.
However, the DB proposes to reinstall the 2004 figure of 17.1 million.
Vzhledem k informačním úkolům, které je třeba splnit v roce, je tento krok nepřijatelný.
In view of the information tasks to be tackled with in 2005, this is not acceptable.
PROGRAM PRINCE, ODDÍL „ROZPRAVA O BUDOUCNOSTI EVROPSKÉ UNIE“
PRINCE PROGRAMME, SECTION 'DEBATE ON THE FUTURE OF EUROPE'
(25 03 02)
(25 03 02)