natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti podle bodu 24 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999.
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999.
NÁVRH USNESENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU............................................................4
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................3
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO ZAHRANIČNÍ VĚCI.............................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...................................................7
ANNEX I..................................................................................................................................12
ANNEX I..................................................................................................................................12
– s ohledem na návrhy rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady předložené Komisí ( KOM(2004)0402 – C6-0213/2004 )
– having regard to the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council presented by the Commission ( COM(2004)0402 – C6-0213/2004 )
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o revizi finančního výhledu na období 2000-2006 předložený Komisí KOM(2004)0666 ,
– having regard to the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the revision of the financial perspective 2000-2006, presented by the Commission COM(2004)0666 ,
– s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o rozpočtové kázni a zlepšení rozpočtového procesu
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
– s ohledem na výsledek dohodovacího řízení s Radou ze dne 25. listopadu 2004,
– having regard to the outcome of the conciliation meeting of 25 November 2004 with the Council,
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru a na stanovisko Výboru pro zahraniční věci ( A6‑0069/2004 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0069/2004 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že EU mohutně podporuje mírový proces v Severním Irsku a prodloužila fungování programu PEACE II,
A. whereas the EU firmly supports the peace process in Northern Ireland and has prolonged the PEACE II programme,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že výrazné zvýšení počtu decentralizovaných agentur v okruhu 3 finančního výhledu nebylo možné předvídat, když byl finanční výhled dne 9. května 1999 schvalován,
B. whereas a very substantial increase of decentralised agencies in heading 3 of the financial perspective was not foreseeable when the financial perspectives were adopted on 9 May 1999,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že v tu dobu nebylo možné předvídat ani možnou účast EU na rozsáhlém programu rekonstrukce Iráku,
C. whereas the possibility of EU participation in a major reconstruction programme in Iraq was also not foreseeable at that time,
1. zdůrazňuje svou obnovenou podporu programu PEACE II a jeho financování; připomíná však, že úprava jednotlivých dílčích stropů v okruhu 2, původně navržená Komisí, by mohla být alternativním řešením;
Stresses its renewed support for the PEACE II programme and its financing; recalls, however, that a revision of the financial perspective sub-ceilings within heading 2, as originally proposed by the Commission, could have been an alternative solution;
o mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti podle bodu 24 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999 ve prospěch rozšíření programu PEACE II, dotací decentralizovaným agenturám a obnovy a rekonstrukce Iráku
on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 in favour of the extension of the PEACE II programme, the subsidies to the decentralised agencies and the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq
s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o rozpočtové kázni a zlepšení rozpočtového procesu
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
C 172 ze dne 18.06.1999, s. 1. a především na bod 24 této dohody,
1. , and in particular point 24 thereof,
se na dohodovací schůzce dne 25. listopadu 2004 obě složky rozpočtového orgánu dohodly na mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti pro doplňkové financování z rozpočtu na rok 2005 ve prospěch:
At the conciliation meeting on 25 November 2004 the two arms of the budgetary authority agreed to mobilise the flexibility instrument to complement the financing in the 2005 budget of:
· rozšíření programu PEACE II částku 45 milionů eur,
· The extension of the PEACE II programme for an amount of EUR 45 million,
· dotací decentralizovaným agenturám celkovou částku 40 milionů eur a
· The subsidies to the decentralised agencies for a global amount of EUR 40 million, and
· obnovy a rekonstrukce Iráku částku 100 milionů eur.
· The rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq for an amount of EUR 100 million.
PŘIJALI TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
V rámci souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na finanční rok 2005 (dále jen „rozpočet na rok 2005“) by měl být nástroj pružnosti použit na zajištění částky 185 milionů eur v položce závazků.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005 (hereinafter "the 2005 budget"), the flexibility instrument shall be used to provide the sum of EUR 185 million in commitment appropriations.
Tyto částky mají být využity na doplňkové financování:
These amounts shall be used to complement the financing of:
· rozšíření programu PEACE II o částku 45 milionů eur v rámci okruhu 2,
· In heading 2, the extension of the PEACE II programme, for an amount of 45 million,
· dotací decentralizovaným agenturám o celkovou částku 40 milionů eur v rámci okruhu 3 a
· In heading 3, the subsidies to the decentralised agencies for an amount of EUR 40 million, and
· pomoci na obnovu a rekonstrukci Iráku o částku 100 milionů eur v rámci okruhu 4, článku 19 08 07 rozpočtu na rok 2005.
· In heading 4, the aid for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq under article 19 08 07 of the 2005 budget for an amount of EUR 100 million
Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie současně s rozpočtem na rok 2005.
This decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union at the same time as the 2005 budget.
V Bruselu, […]
Done at Brussels, […]
Za Evropský Parlament Za Radu
For the European Parliament For the Council
Předseda Předseda
The President The President
k návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti ve prospěch obnovy a rekonstrukce Iráku ve smyslu bodu 24 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument in favour of the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999
Brief Background
Brief Background
When the most recent financial perspectives were adopted in 1999, the issue of possible EU participation in the reconstruction was unforeseeable.
When the most recent financial perspectives were adopted in 1999, the issue of possible EU participation in the reconstruction was unforeseeable.
Subsequent events have obviously precipated new financial demands, eg. for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq.
Subsequent events have obviously precipated new financial demands, eg. for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq.
Last year, at the Madrid Ministerial Conference (October 2003), the Commission, on behalf of the European Union, made a pledge that the Community would participate in the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq.
Last year, at the Madrid Ministerial Conference (October 2003), the Commission, on behalf of the European Union, made a pledge that the Community would participate in the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq.
(The Union as a whole pledged over EUR 1.25 bn, including the Community's contribution).
(The Union as a whole pledged over EUR 1.25 bn, including the Community's contribution).
Since the war, EUR 320m has been allocated from the Community budget.
Since the war, EUR 320m has been allocated from the Community budget.
A further EUR 200m has been proposed for 2005.
A further EUR 200m has been proposed for 2005.
In order for the Community to be able to continue to contribute to the commitments undertaken for reconstruction and rehabilitation activities in Iraq in 2005 (EUR 200m), the Commission i) made substantial cuts (referred to as 'reprogramming' by the Commission) to existing budget lines/programmes in its 2005 Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) and ii) proposed having recourse to the Flexibility Instrument (to the tune of EUR 115m).
In order for the Community to be able to continue to contribute to the commitments undertaken for reconstruction and rehabilitation activities in Iraq in 2005 (EUR 200m), the Commission i) made substantial cuts (referred to as 'reprogramming' by the Commission) to existing budget lines/programmes in its 2005 Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) and ii) proposed having recourse to the Flexibility Instrument (to the tune of EUR 115m).
The Council, in its 2005 Draft Budget (DB) made even greater cuts, with no recourse to the Flexibility Instrument.
The Council, in its 2005 Draft Budget (DB) made even greater cuts, with no recourse to the Flexibility Instrument.
It will be recalled that, by contrast, it increased the CFSP budget.
It will be recalled that, by contrast, it increased the CFSP budget.
In its First Reading, Parliament restored many of the depleted budget lines and, exclusively for tactical purposes, made a cut to the CFSP budget line.
In its First Reading, Parliament restored many of the depleted budget lines and, exclusively for tactical purposes, made a cut to the CFSP budget line.
The Flexibility Instrument
The Flexibility Instrument
The Flexibility Instrument, which has an annual ceiling of EUR 200m, is intended to allow financing for a given financial year, up to the amount indicated, of expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available, for one or more headings.
The Flexibility Instrument, which has an annual ceiling of EUR 200m, is intended to allow financing for a given financial year, up to the amount indicated, of expenditure which could not be financed within the limits of the ceilings available, for one or more headings.
It should be noted that, according to the provisions of Article 24 of the Inter-Institutional Agreement, and considering the use already made of the Flexibility Instrument in the last two years (EUR 12m in 2003; EUR 95m in 2004 - substantially for Iraq), the flexibility reserve in 2005 amounts to EUR 493m.
It should be noted that, according to the provisions of Article 24 of the Inter-Institutional Agreement, and considering the use already made of the Flexibility Instrument in the last two years (EUR 12m in 2003; EUR 95m in 2004 - substantially for Iraq), the flexibility reserve in 2005 amounts to EUR 493m.
Of this, EUR 188m will lapse at the end of 2005 if unused).
Of this, EUR 188m will lapse at the end of 2005 if unused).
As stated above, EUR 200m has been pledged for Iraq for 2005.
As stated above, EUR 200m has been pledged for Iraq for 2005.
Of this, EUR 190m is to go directly on to the Iraq budget-line (19), and the remaining EUR 10m will go onto the EIDHR (European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights) line.
Of this, EUR 190m is to go directly on to the Iraq budget-line (19), and the remaining EUR 10m will go onto the EIDHR (European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights) line.
Draftsman's Position
Draftsman's Position
The draftsman's position has been consistently as follows:
The draftsman's position has been consistently as follows:
Any contributions by the EU towards meeting new financial demands for unexpected or continuing/worsening crises cannot come at the expense of the Community's existing regional, geographical or political commitments.
Any contributions by the EU towards meeting new financial demands for unexpected or continuing/worsening crises cannot come at the expense of the Community's existing regional, geographical or political commitments.
Equally, recourse to the Flexibility Instrument should not have to be a routine response to compensate for deficiencies in the heading 4 (External Relations) ceiling, and this will have to be resolved more satisfactorily in the longer term.
Equally, recourse to the Flexibility Instrument should not have to be a routine response to compensate for deficiencies in the heading 4 (External Relations) ceiling, and this will have to be resolved more satisfactorily in the longer term.
However, given the constraints on heading 4 at present, there appears to be no option but to again have recourse to the Flexibility Instrument for 2005.
However, given the constraints on heading 4 at present, there appears to be no option but to again have recourse to the Flexibility Instrument for 2005.
Result of 25 November Conciliation
Result of 25 November Conciliation
A discussion on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, reiterating the above-mentioned position, was held by the Foreign Affairs Committee in September, bearing in mind that a firm decision would only be reached at the conciliation meeting to be held between the European Parliament and the Council on 25 November.
A discussion on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument, reiterating the above-mentioned position, was held by the Foreign Affairs Committee in September, bearing in mind that a firm decision would only be reached at the conciliation meeting to be held between the European Parliament and the Council on 25 November.
The outcome of the conciliation as regards the Flexibility Instrument was as follows: the Flexibility Instrument is to be mobilised to the tune of EUR 100m for heading 4.
The outcome of the conciliation as regards the Flexibility Instrument was as follows: the Flexibility Instrument is to be mobilised to the tune of EUR 100m for heading 4.
In addition, EUR 190m in commitments for the Iraq reconstruction line has been agreed, and the CFSP commitment appropriations would be EUR 62.6m, as originally requested by the Council.
In addition, EUR 190m in commitments for the Iraq reconstruction line has been agreed, and the CFSP commitment appropriations would be EUR 62.6m, as originally requested by the Council.
It should be added that a further element of the agreement reached between the two institutions was the confirmation that Croatia would now be moved to Heading 7 (Enlargement).
It should be added that a further element of the agreement reached between the two institutions was the confirmation that Croatia would now be moved to Heading 7 (Enlargement).
Taking into account the fact that Croatia has now been moved to Heading 7, making a further + EUR 65m available under Heading 4, there is still a shortfall for the External Relations budget of EUR 29m, which will have to be reflected in cuts to those areas covered by AFET and Development.
Taking into account the fact that Croatia has now been moved to Heading 7, making a further + EUR 65m available under Heading 4, there is still a shortfall for the External Relations budget of EUR 29m, which will have to be reflected in cuts to those areas covered by AFET and Development.
These will have to be negotiated between the draftsmen for the two committees and the rapporteur for the BUDG in the next few days, in view of the forthcoming second reading on the budget (December II).
These will have to be negotiated between the draftsmen for the two committees and the rapporteur for the BUDG in the next few days, in view of the forthcoming second reading on the budget (December II).
In the light of the above, especially of the fact that the Council was once again against using the Flexibility Instrument and simply applied savage cuts all round (with the exception of the CFSP lines!) and that the Commission had proposed using EUR 115m of Flexibility Instruments money, the outcome of the Parliament's hard bargaining in the conciliation can be seen as quite positive.
In the light of the above, especially of the fact that the Council was once again against using the Flexibility Instrument and simply applied savage cuts all round (with the exception of the CFSP lines!) and that the Commission had proposed using EUR 115m of Flexibility Instruments money, the outcome of the Parliament's hard bargaining in the conciliation can be seen as quite positive.
As such, the draftsman's recommendation is that the Committee endorse the outcome of the conciliation meeting of 25 November on the use of EUR 100m from the Flexibility Instrument and reconfirm the mandate given to him at the 13 September AFET meeting to continue negotiations on behalf of AFET.
As such, the draftsman's recommendation is that the Committee endorse the outcome of the conciliation meeting of 25 November on the use of EUR 100m from the Flexibility Instrument and reconfirm the mandate given to him at the 13 September AFET meeting to continue negotiations on behalf of AFET.
Výbor pro zahraniční věci vyzývá Rozpočtový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do své zprávy začlenil tyto pozměňovací návrhy:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti ve smyslu bodu 24 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999
Zpravodaj(ové) Datum jmenování
Draftsman Date appointed
Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Monika Beňová, Philip Claeys, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Helmut Kuhne, Vytautas Landsbergis, Philippe Morillon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García
Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Monika Beňová, Philip Claeys, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Helmut Kuhne, Vytautas Landsbergis, Philippe Morillon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García
Mr Janusz Lewandowski
Mr Janusz Lewandowski
Committee on Budgets
Committee on Budgets
Dear Mr Lewandowski,
Dear Mr Lewandowski,
Subject : Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Revision of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006
Subject : Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Revision of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006
By letter of 13 October 2004, the Commission referred to the European Parliament a proposal for a Decision on the Revision of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006.
By letter of 13 October 2004, the Commission referred to the European Parliament a proposal for a Decision on the Revision of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006.
This deals, amongst other issues, with 'Structural funds' in the financial perspective and the envisaged supplementary expenditure for the Irish PEACE II programme for the years 2005 and 2006.
This deals, amongst other issues, with 'Structural funds' in the financial perspective and the envisaged supplementary expenditure for the Irish PEACE II programme for the years 2005 and 2006.
Given the absence of margin under this subheading, this would involve raising the ceiling for commitment appropriations by the relevant amounts.
Given the absence of margin under this subheading, this would involve raising the ceiling for commitment appropriations by the relevant amounts.
I am therefore writing to inform you that the Committee on Regional Development voted today unanimously, with one abstention, to approve the Commission's proposal
I am therefore writing to inform you that the Committee on Regional Development voted today unanimously, with one abstention, to approve the Commission's proposal
Recommendation‑ without amendment.
Recommendation‑ without amendment.
As you will be aware, the peace process in Northern Ireland continues to be extremely delicate as the political institutions set up by the 1998 Belfast Agreement remain in suspension.
As you will be aware, the peace process in Northern Ireland continues to be extremely delicate as the political institutions set up by the 1998 Belfast Agreement remain in suspension.
At the present time, while negotiations aimed at restoring devolved government enter a critical phase, my Committee considers that a positive signal from the EU is essential.
At the present time, while negotiations aimed at restoring devolved government enter a critical phase, my Committee considers that a positive signal from the EU is essential.
As the Commission itself has stated, "consolidation of the peace process in Northern Ireland, to which the PEACE programme has made an original and essential contribution thus far, requires continuing financial support from the European Community to the regions concerned and the extension of the PEACE programme for another two years".
As the Commission itself has stated, "consolidation of the peace process in Northern Ireland, to which the PEACE programme has made an original and essential contribution thus far, requires continuing financial support from the European Community to the regions concerned and the extension of the PEACE programme for another two years".
I would therefore request Mr Chairman, that you draw the attention of your members to the position of my Committee and that you approve the necessary modifications to the 2000-2006 Financial Perspective, or take whatever other measures you consider to be necessary, in order to allow this extension of the PEACE Programme to come into force on 1 January 2005.
I would therefore request Mr Chairman, that you draw the attention of your members to the position of my Committee and that you approve the necessary modifications to the 2000-2006 Financial Perspective, or take whatever other measures you consider to be necessary, in order to allow this extension of the PEACE Programme to come into force on 1 January 2005.
Thank you for your cooperation,
Thank you for your cooperation,
Yours Sincerely,
Yours Sincerely,
[ Gerardo Galeote Quecedo ]
[ Gerardo Galeote Quecedo ]
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o mobilizaci nástroje pružnosti ve prospěch obnovy a rekonstrukce Iráku ve smyslu bodu 24 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999.
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument in favour of the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Iraq according to point 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999.
Interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 6. května 1999, bod 24
Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999, point 24
Základy v jednacím řádu
Basis in Rules of Procedure
Datum předložení EP
Date of consulting Parliament
NÁVRH USNESENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU............................................................6
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...............................................4