natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a) nejpozději 31. března 2011 průběžnou hodnotící zprávu o dosažených výsledcích a kvalitativních a kvantitativních ukazatelích provádění tohoto programu;
(a) an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this programme no later than 31 March 2011 ;
b) nejpozději 31. prosince 2011 sdělení o pokračování tohoto programu;
(b) a Communication on the continuation of this programme no later than 31 December 2011 ;
c) nejpozději 31. března 2016 zprávu o hodnocení ex post.
(c) an ex post evaluation report no later than 31 March 2016 .
a) tři roky po přijetí programu průběžnou hodnotící zprávu o dosažených výsledcích a kvalitativních a kvantitativních ukazatelích provádění tohoto programu;
(a) an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this programme three years after the adoption of the programme ;
b) čtyři roky po přijetí programu sdělení o pokračování tohoto programu;
(b) a Communication on the continuation of this programme four years after the adoption of the programme ;
c) v okamžiku ukončení programu zprávu o hodnocení ex post týkající se provádění a výsledků programu.
(c) an ex post evaluation report on the implementation and outcome of the programme once the implementation of the programme has been completed .
Democratic scrutiny in the form of appropriate monitoring and assessment of the programme is essential.
Democratic scrutiny in the form of appropriate monitoring and assessment of the programme is essential.
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí program „Mládež v akci“ na období 2007–2013
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision creating the ‘Youth in Action’ programme for the period 2007-2013
Navrhovatel: Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor
Draftsman: Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor
General Objectives of the Programme:
General Objectives of the Programme:
The Draftsman generally welcomes the “Youth in Action” programme which gives opportunities to develop solidarity amongst young people and promotes an active citizenship.
The Draftsman generally welcomes the “Youth in Action” programme which gives opportunities to develop solidarity amongst young people and promotes an active citizenship.
The current Youth programme included among its four general aims encouraging “young people’s initiative, enterprise and creativity so that they may take an active role in society and, at the same time, to stimulate recognition of the value of informal education acquired within a European context”.
The current Youth programme included among its four general aims encouraging “young people’s initiative, enterprise and creativity so that they may take an active role in society and, at the same time, to stimulate recognition of the value of informal education acquired within a European context”.
The proposal presented by the Commission does not include this aim amongst its general aims (Article 2) but within the specific one of promoting the active citizenship of young people (Article 3.1.f).
The proposal presented by the Commission does not include this aim amongst its general aims (Article 2) but within the specific one of promoting the active citizenship of young people (Article 3.1.f).
In real terms this disappearance is observed in the disappearance from the proposal for a new programme of previous action 3.2 Future Capital, which encouraged the realisation of projects by ex-volunteers of the European Voluntary Service.
In real terms this disappearance is observed in the disappearance from the proposal for a new programme of previous action 3.2 Future Capital, which encouraged the realisation of projects by ex-volunteers of the European Voluntary Service.
This permitted the transferral of what had been learnt during the Voluntary Service to the local community through the planning of a personal project, including professional or business start up projects thereby promoting professional and entrepreneurial spirit.
This permitted the transferral of what had been learnt during the Voluntary Service to the local community through the planning of a personal project, including professional or business start up projects thereby promoting professional and entrepreneurial spirit.
It is not clear to the Draftsman why this action is now not included in the new proposal.
It is not clear to the Draftsman why this action is now not included in the new proposal.
Article 4(2) European Voluntary Service
Article 4(2) European Voluntary Service
'The aim of this action is to step up young people's participation in various forms of voluntary activities, both within and outside the European Union.'
'The aim of this action is to step up young people's participation in various forms of voluntary activities, both within and outside the European Union.'
The annex contains a breakdown of the measures coming under this item that is not sufficiently clear and is not duly motivated in the proposal for a decision, despite the fact that the measures account for one third of the total resources set out in the Commission proposal.
The annex contains a breakdown of the measures coming under this item that is not sufficiently clear and is not duly motivated in the proposal for a decision, despite the fact that the measures account for one third of the total resources set out in the Commission proposal.
Specifically, the annex refers to:
Specifically, the annex refers to:
European voluntary service (groups)
European voluntary service (groups)
This measure supports volunteer projects with the same characteristics as those described in point 2.1 above which allow groups of young people to take part collectively in European-level or international-level activities in the fields of culture, sport, civil protection, the environment, development aid, etc.
This measure supports volunteer projects with the same characteristics as those described in point 2.1 above which allow groups of young people to take part collectively in European-level or international-level activities in the fields of culture, sport, civil protection, the environment, development aid, etc.
In principle, it is open to young people aged between 18 and 30.
In principle, it is open to young people aged between 18 and 30.
Depending on the tasks to be implemented and the situation in which the volunteers are deployed, certain types of project may call for the selection of candidates with specific skills.'
Depending on the tasks to be implemented and the situation in which the volunteers are deployed, certain types of project may call for the selection of candidates with specific skills.'
It should be pointed out first of all that, contrary to the Commission's claims, the projects do not have the same characteristics.
It should be pointed out first of all that, contrary to the Commission's claims, the projects do not have the same characteristics.
Given that they follow on from the current group EVS measures, the projects will be headed by a large coordinating organisation (which will not be conducive to participation by and partnership with local organisations), they are of short duration (and therefore will not have the educational impact of long EVS projects in terms of cultural adjustment, personal development, etc.), and they are expensive (around € 4 000 for a project lasting two months or so, as against € 4 500 for a six-month project).
Given that they follow on from the current group EVS measures, the projects will be headed by a large coordinating organisation (which will not be conducive to participation by and partnership with local organisations), they are of short duration (and therefore will not have the educational impact of long EVS projects in terms of cultural adjustment, personal development, etc.), and they are expensive (around € 4 000 for a project lasting two months or so, as against € 4 500 for a six-month project).
The other possibility is for this action to cover the arrangement referred to in Article III-321 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
The other possibility is for this action to cover the arrangement referred to in Article III-321 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
'In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up.
'In order to establish a framework for joint contributions from young Europeans to the humanitarian aid operations of the Union, a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps shall be set up.
European laws shall determine the rules and procedures for operation of the Corps.' ; however, in view of the deadlines and pre-requisites for the establishment of the corps, it is unlikely to be operational in 2007.
European laws shall determine the rules and procedures for operation of the Corps.' ; however, in view of the deadlines and pre-requisites for the establishment of the corps, it is unlikely to be operational in 2007.
The Commission should be asked for a more detailed explanation of why such a large amount of money has been allocated to this sub-action and to supply the findings of any studies (assessments of the impact of completed group EVS projects) that support its proposal.
The Commission should be asked for a more detailed explanation of why such a large amount of money has been allocated to this sub-action and to supply the findings of any studies (assessments of the impact of completed group EVS projects) that support its proposal.
Action 2 (European Voluntary Service) has been allocated a budget (€ 291 500) similar to that of Action 1 (Youth for Europe, € 310 000).
Action 2 (European Voluntary Service) has been allocated a budget (€ 291 500) similar to that of Action 1 (Youth for Europe, € 310 000).
Since Action 1 is not only able to reach a far greater number of young people, but is also more accessible for less-advantaged young people, the draftsman proposes that the indicative breakdown budget reflect this situation.
Since Action 1 is not only able to reach a far greater number of young people, but is also more accessible for less-advantaged young people, the draftsman proposes that the indicative breakdown budget reflect this situation.
A part of the budget for Action 2 should therefore be transferred to Action 1.
A part of the budget for Action 2 should therefore be transferred to Action 1.
Výbor pro kulturu a vzdělávání věci vyzývá Výbor pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci jako příslušný výbor, aby do své zprávy začlenil tyto pozměňovací návrhy:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Pozměňovací návrhy Parlamentu
Amendment by Maria Carlshamre
(2) Smlouva o Evropské unii je založena na zásadách svobody, demokracie, dodržování lidských práv a základních svobod a k rozvíjení těchto hodnot má přispět podpora aktivního občanství mladých lidí.
The Treaty on European Union is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the promotion of young people's active citizenship should contribute to the development of these values.
(2) Evropská unie je založena na zásadách svobody, demokracie, dodržování lidských práv a základních svobod a na rovnosti mezi muži a ženami a k rozvíjení těchto hodnot má přispět podpora aktivního občanství mladých lidí.
(2) The European Union is founded on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and equality between men and women, and the promotion of young people's active citizenship should contribute to the development of these values.
g) dbát na to, aby se programu zúčastnili ti mladí, kteří mají příležitostí nejméně; včetně mladých lidí se zdravotním postižením;
g) facilitating participation in the programme by young people with the fewest opportunities , including young people with disabilities ;
( Tato změna platí v rámci celého textu.
( This amendment applies throughout the text.
Země účastnící se programu přijmou vhodná opatření , aby odstranily překážky pro mobilitu účastníků a aby účastníci měli přístup ke zdravotní péči, zachovali si sociální ochranu, mohli cestovat a pobývat v přijímající zemi.
The participating countries shall take appropriate measures to remove obstacles to the mobility of participants, so that the latter have access to health care, retain their social protection and are able to travel and reside in the host country.
Země účastnící se programu přijmou podle potřeby vhodná opatření, aby zajistily přijetí příjemců ze třetích zemí na svém území .
Countries participating in the programme shall, if necessary, take appropriate measures to ensure that beneficiaries from third countries are admitted to their territory.
Země účastnící se programu budou usilovat o přijetí vhodných opatření k tomu, aby účastníci programu mohli mít přístup ke zdravotní péči v souladu s ustanoveními práva Společenství.
The participating countries shall endeavour to take appropriate measures so that participants in the programme may have access to health care in accordance with the provisions of Community law.
Členský stát původu bude usilovat o přijetí vhodných opatření k tomu, aby si účastníci Evropské dobrovolné služby mohli ponechat své sociální zabezpečení.
The Member State of origin shall endeavour to take appropriate measures so that participants in the European Voluntary Service may retain their social protection.
Zúčastněné země budou také co nejvíce usilovat o přijetí opatření, která považují za nezbytná a žádoucí k odstranění právních a administrativních překážek v přístupu k tomuto programu.
The participating countries shall also endeavour as far as possible to adopt such measures as they deem necessary and desirable to remove legal and administrative obstacles to access to this programme.
The Commission's proposed wording inplies that Member States would have to change systems, which can only be changed under other treaties and bot under Article 149.
The Commission's proposed wording implies that Member States would have to change systems, which can only be changed under other treaties and not under Article 149.
Učiní vhodná opatření pro šíření informací prostřednictvím nejvhodnějších prostředků a za pomoci národních agentur, pro zaměření informací o programu na menší organizace, zejména na regionální a místní úrovni.
They will take appropriate measures to disseminate information through the use of the most appropriate tools and, with the aid of the National Agencies, target information about the programme towards smaller organisations, especially at regional and local level.
To enable greater participation, the draftsman asks that the visibility of the programme be increased through improving the quality of information available to young people and their access to it through the use of the most appropriate tools to disseminate information (in the case of young people this would be the TV, the Internet and mobile phones).
To enable greater participation, the draftsman asks that the visibility of the programme be increased through improving the quality of information available to young people and their access to it through the use of the most appropriate tools to disseminate information (in the case of young people this would be the TV, the Internet and mobile phones).
Asks also that the national agencies themselves take steps to ensure that information on the programme reaches those smaller organisations, particularly at regional and local level, in keeping with the spirit of increasing decentralisation.
Asks also that the national agencies themselves take steps to ensure that information on the programme reaches those smaller organisations, particularly at regional and local level, in keeping with the spirit of increasing decentralisation.
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí program „MLÁDEŽ V AKCI“ na období 2007–-2013
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council creating the "YOUTH IN ACTION" programme for the period 2007-2013
Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Edit Bauer, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giusto Catania, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Rosa Díez González, Antoine Duquesne, Kinga Gál, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Lívia Járóka, Timothy Kirkhope, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Sarah Ludford, Edith Mastenbroek, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Hartmut Nassauer, Bogdan Pęk, Lapo Pistelli, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka.
Alexander Nuno Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Edit Bauer, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giusto Catania, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Rosa Díez González, Antoine Duquesne, Kinga Gál, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Lívia Járóka, Timothy Kirkhope, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Sarah Ludford, Edith Mastenbroek, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Hartmut Nassauer, Bogdan Pęk, Lapo Pistelli, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka.
k návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí program „ Mládež v akci “ na období 2007–2013
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council creating the "Youth in action" programme for the period 2007-2013
The proposal for the Youth in Action -programme for 2007-2013 has its legal basis in Article 149 of the EC Treaty, which states that Community action shall be aimed at "encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges of social-educational instructors."
The proposal for the Youth in Action -programme for 2007-2013 has its legal basis in Article 149 of the EC Treaty, which states that Community action shall be aimed at "encouraging the development of youth exchanges and of exchanges of social-educational instructors."
The aim of the proposal is to promote solidarity and mobility among young Europeans in the EU and in the neighbouring areas.
The aim of the proposal is to promote solidarity and mobility among young Europeans in the EU and in the neighbouring areas.
The objectives are detailed as:
The objectives are detailed as:
- promoting young people’s active citizenship in general and their European citizenship in particular
- promoting young people’s active citizenship in general and their European citizenship in particular
- developing young people’s solidarity, in particular in order to reinforce social cohesion in the European Union
- developing young people’s solidarity, in particular in order to reinforce social cohesion in the European Union
- fostering mutual understanding between peoples through young people
- fostering mutual understanding between peoples through young people
- contributing to developing the quality of support systems for youth activities and the capabilities of civil society organisations in the youth field
- contributing to developing the quality of support systems for youth activities and the capabilities of civil society organisations in the youth field
- promoting European cooperation in youth policy.
- promoting European cooperation in youth policy.
These objectives are to be pursued inside five programmes: "Youth for Europe" (exchanges and mobility), "European Voluntary Service" (active engagement), "Youth of the world" (neighbouring and third countries), "Youth workers and support systems" (support structures for young people), and "Support for policy cooperation" (cooperation on youth policy).
These objectives are to be pursued inside five programmes: "Youth for Europe" (exchanges and mobility), "European Voluntary Service" (active engagement), "Youth of the world" (neighbouring and third countries), "Youth workers and support systems" (support structures for young people), and "Support for policy cooperation" (cooperation on youth policy).
The proposal carries forth the achievements of the current YOUTH-programme, which expires in 2006.
The proposal carries forth the achievements of the current YOUTH-programme, which expires in 2006.
It consolidates budgetary provisions and existing programmes in the field of youth, and simplifies the way projects are applied for, chosen and managed.
It consolidates budgetary provisions and existing programmes in the field of youth, and simplifies the way projects are applied for, chosen and managed.
It would thus create an increasingly visible and autonomous Youth-programme for the EU, with EUR 915 million earmarked for the period of the programme (2007-2013).
It would thus create an increasingly visible and autonomous Youth-programme for the EU, with EUR 915 million earmarked for the period of the programme (2007-2013).
Assessment of the proposal
Assessment of the proposal
On the whole, the proposal builds on existing experience and seeks to strengthen the salience and efficiency of Community action in the important youth-domain.
On the whole, the proposal builds on existing experience and seeks to strengthen the salience and efficiency of Community action in the important youth-domain.
Its innovations are mainly in streamlining bureaucracy, and it can thereby enable EU programmes in this field to become more relevant and targeted for those actions in need of EU support.
Its innovations are mainly in streamlining bureaucracy, and it can thereby enable EU programmes in this field to become more relevant and targeted for those actions in need of EU support.
However, a number of points deserve special attention.
However, a number of points deserve special attention.
First, it is debatable whether the proposed sum of EUR 915 million is enough to support all the outlined objectives, especially for robust youth exchanges with other countries.
First, it is debatable whether the proposed sum of EUR 915 million is enough to support all the outlined objectives, especially for robust youth exchanges with other countries.
Furthermore, the list of countries eligible to participate in the programmes, as listed in Article 5 paragraph 1, should be enlarged to include, for example, China and Russia.
Furthermore, the list of countries eligible to participate in the programmes, as listed in Article 5 paragraph 1, should be enlarged to include, for example, China and Russia.
What is more, the targets should not be prescribed in an overly a priori fashion: those that have a significant chance of contributing to important youth-aims (e.g. promoting youth exchanges and mobility for alleviating youth unemployment, or focusing on the disabled in order to support their employment-prospects) should emerge as priorities over some of the less operative target areas, such as increasing youth engagement in providing voluntary services.
What is more, the targets should not be prescribed in an overly a priori fashion: those that have a significant chance of contributing to important youth-aims (e.g. promoting youth exchanges and mobility for alleviating youth unemployment, or focusing on the disabled in order to support their employment-prospects) should emerge as priorities over some of the less operative target areas, such as increasing youth engagement in providing voluntary services.
Local and cultural traditions should not be overlooked, and for example, predetermined age-limits and educational requirements should not dictate access to these measures (i.e. actions 2.2, 2.3, European Voluntary Service for groups and Cooperation between civil and volunteer services, respectively).
Local and cultural traditions should not be overlooked, and for example, predetermined age-limits and educational requirements should not dictate access to these measures (i.e. actions 2.2, 2.3, European Voluntary Service for groups and Cooperation between civil and volunteer services, respectively).
Likewise, projects under Action 4 (Youth workers and support systems), should not be overly directed from above.
Likewise, projects under Action 4 (Youth workers and support systems), should not be overly directed from above.