natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Some batteries are cheap, but have a much shorter lifetime.
Some batteries are cheap, but have a much shorter lifetime.
For example the capacity of Alkaline batteries is about four times higher than the capacity of the Zinc-Carbon batteries.
For example the capacity of Alkaline batteries is about four times higher than the capacity of the Zinc-Carbon batteries.
Allthough the price of the Zinc-Carbon batteries is half of the price of Alkaline batteries, buying Alkaline batteries is about two times more economic considering the capacity.
Allthough the price of the Zinc-Carbon batteries is half of the price of Alkaline batteries, buying Alkaline batteries is about two times more economic considering the capacity.
Above this, Zinc-Carbon batteries contain much more lead: this is an important environmental reason not preferring Zinc-Carbon batteries.
Above this, Zinc-Carbon batteries contain much more lead: this is an important environmental reason not preferring Zinc-Carbon batteries.
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o bateriích a akumulátorech a odpadních bateriích a akumulátorech a o zrušení směrnice 91/157/EHS
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC
Datum prvního čtení EP – P číslo
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
ENVI 8.9.2005
ENVI 8.9.2005
Hans Blokland 14.9.2005
Hans Blokland 14.9.2005
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, Frederika Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, Frederika Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Margrete Auken, David Casa, Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Anne Laperrouze, Robert Sturdy, Andres Tarand
Margrete Auken, David Casa, Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Anne Laperrouze, Robert Sturdy, Andres Tarand
PE 364.850v02-00
PE 364.850v02-00
o návrhu opravného rozpočtu Evropské unie č. 6/2005 na rozpočtový rok 2005, oddíl IV – Soudní dvůr – zřízení Soudu pro veřejnou službu v pozměněném znění Rady
on Draft amending budget No 6/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, Section IV – Court of Justice - Establishment of the Civil Service Tribunal, as modified by the Council
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh opravného rozpočtu Evropské unie č. 7/2005 na rozpočtový rok 2005, který předložila Komise dne 5. září 2005 ( KOM(2005)0419 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 7/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, which the Commission presented on 5 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0419 ),
– s ohledem na návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005, který sestavila Rada dne 3. října 2005 (12180/2005 – C6-0304/2005 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2005, which the Council established on 3 October 2005 (12180/2005 – C6‑0304/2005 ),
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 25. října 2005 o návrhu opravného rozpočtu Evropské unie č. 6/2005 na rozpočtový rok 2005, oddíl IV – Soudní dvůr – Soud pro veřejnou službu
– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2005 on Draft amending budget No 6/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, Section IV - Court of Justice - Establishment of the Civil Service Tribunal
– s ohledem na svou změnu návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 ze dne 25. října 2005
– having regard to its amendment of 25 October 2005 to Draft amending budget No 6/2005
– s ohledem na to, že Rada dne 21. listopadu 2005 odmítla změnu návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 přijatou Parlamentem (13784/2005),
– having regard to the Council's rejection of 21 November 2005 of the amendment adopted by Parliament to Draft amending budget No 6/2004 (13784/2005),
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0336/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0336/2005 ),
The Rapporteur proposes to confirm Parliament's first reading amendment, which consisted of creating all posts requested by the Court of Justice in Preliminary draft amending budget No 7/2005 and adjusting the appropriations in Draft amending budget 6/2005 accordingly.
The Rapporteur proposes to confirm Parliament's first reading amendment, which consisted of creating all posts requested by the Court of Justice in Preliminary draft amending budget No 7/2005 and adjusting the appropriations in Draft amending budget 6/2005 accordingly.
The amending budget is budgetary neutral.
The amending budget is budgetary neutral.
Návrh opravného rozpočtu Evropské unie č. 6/2005 na rozpočtový rok 2005 – zřízení Soudu pro veřejnou službu v pozměněném znění Rady
Draft amending budget No 6/2003 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, Section IV – Court of Justice - Establishment of the Civil Service Tribunal, as modified by the Council
Články 272 ES a 177 Euratom
Articles 272 EC and 177 Euratom
69 a příloha IV jednacího řádu
Rule 69 and Annex IV
Přeběžný návrh opravného rozpočtu
Preliminary draft amending budget
Datum prvního čtení Parlamentu – číslo P
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
25.10.2005 P6_TA(2005)0392
25.10.2005 P6_TA(2005)0392
Datum jednání v Radě
Date of the Council's deliberations
Datum zaslání výsledku
Date result forwarded
PE 362.733v02-00
PE 362.733v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady a Komise (KOM (2005)0333)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2005)0333 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ( A6‑0337/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6‑0000/2005),
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady a Komise o uzavření Dohody o vědeckotechnické spolupráci mezi Evropskými společenstvími na jedné straně a Švýcarskou konfederací na straně druhé jménem Evropského společenství a Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii
Proposal for a decision of the Council and of the Commission on the conclusion on behalf of the European Community and the European Atomic Energy Community of the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation between the European Communities of the one part and the Swiss Confederation of the other part
ITRE 27.10.2005
ITRE 27.10.2005
ke společnému postoji Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o strojních zařízeních a o změně směrnice 95/16/ES
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC
PE 362.847v01-00
PE 362.847v02-00
NÁVRH LEGISLATIVNÍHO USNESENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU...........................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
o společném postoji Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o strojních zařízeních a o změně směrnice 95/16/ES
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery, and amending Directive 95/16/EC
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (5786/2/2005 – C6‑0267/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (5786/2/2005 – C6‑0267/2005 ),
C 271 E, 12.11.2003, s. 491 k návrhu Komise předloženému Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2000)0899 )
491. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2000)0899 )
– s ohledem na změny návrhu Komise ( KOM(2003)0048 )
– having regard to the amendments to the Commission proposal ( COM(2003)0048 )
– s ohledem na doporučení pro druhé čtení dané Výborem pro vnitřní trh a ochranu spotřebitelů ( A6‑0338/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0338/2005 ),
Bod odůvodnění 8 a (nový)
RECITAL 8 A (new)
8a) Členské státy odpovídají za zajištění toho, aby se tato směrnice účinně uplatňovala na jejich území a aby se bezpečnost dotyčného strojního zařízení co možná nejvíce zlepšila v souladu s jejími ustanoveními.
(8a) Member States are responsible for ensuring that this Directive is effectively enforced in their territory and the safety of the machinery concerned is, as far as possible, improved in accordance with its provisions.
Komise by měla následně vypracovat obecné zásady provádění tržního dohledu a členské státy by měly rozvinout své možnosti za účelem zajištění účinného tržního dohledu tak, aby zaručily správné a jednotné používání této směrnice.
The Commission should consequently develop guidelines for carrying out market surveillance, and the Member States should expand their capabilities in order to ensure effective market surveillance, so as to guarantee the proper and uniform application of this Directive.
(19) Označení CE by mělo být plně uznáno jako jediné označení, které zaručuje, že strojní zařízení splňuje požadavky této směrnice.
(19) The CE marking should be fully recognised as being the only marking which guarantees that machinery conforms to the requirements of this Directive.
Všechna ostatní označení, která by mohla třetí osoby uvést v omyl, pokud jde o význam nebo tvar označení CE, by měla být zakázána.
All other markings which are liable to mislead third parties as to the meaning and/or the form of the CE marking should be prohibited.
Všechna ostatní označení, která by mohla třetí osoby uvést v omyl, pokud jde o význam nebo tvar označení CE nebo obojí , by měla být zakázána.
All other markings which are liable to mislead third parties as to the meaning or the form of the CE marking , or both, should be prohibited.
The wording 'and/or' is not very clear from a legal point of view.
The wording 'and/or' is not very clear from a legal point of view.
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 19A (nový)
RECITAL 19 A (new)
19a) Komise by měla do roku 2007 předložit návrh rámcové směrnice o jednotném používání označení CE s ohledem na všechny platné směrnice.
(19a) The Commission should present by 2007 a proposal for a framework directive on uniform use of the CE marking in respect of all directives in force.
The different wording on the use of the CE marking in the many different directives causes great uncertainty for users.
The different wording on the use of the CE marking in the many different directives causes great uncertainty for users.
Until the Commission presents a harmonised proposal on the use of the marking, the current compromise proposal should apply to the CE marking in respect of the machinery directive.
Until the Commission presents a harmonised proposal on the use of the marking, the current compromise proposal should apply to the CE marking in respect of the machinery directive.
– jističe a vypínače ;
– circuit-breakers and switches ;
- nízkonapěťové spínače a řídící jednotky ;
- low ‑voltage switchgear and control gear ;
Electric motors should be listed among the products excluded from the scope of the directive.
Electric motors should be listed among the products excluded from the scope of the directive.
If they are treated as drive systems, that implies that they are partly completed machinery as defined in Article 2(h) of the revised Machinery Directive.
If they are treated as drive systems, that implies that they are partly completed machinery as defined in Article 2(h) of the revised Machinery Directive.
The only way to prevent such problems is to remove electric motors from the Machinery Directive.
The only way to prevent such problems is to remove electric motors from the Machinery Directive.
To avoid unnecessary confusion, the same wording should be used in Article 1(2)(k) and (2)(l), since the appliances referred to are of the same type, more broadly termed ‘switchgear and control gear’.
To avoid unnecessary confusion, the same wording should be used in Article 1(2)(k) and (2)(l), since the appliances referred to are of the same type, more broadly termed ‘switchgear and control gear’.
la) zařízení, která vzhledem ke svému tvaru, velikosti, funkci nebo účelu či energii, která se v nich ukládá nebo kterou spotřebovávají, nejsou nebezpečná.
(la) machinery which, owing to its shape, size, function, or purpose, and to the energy stored within it or used by it, is harmless.
Parliament already took the view at first reading that pointless administrative formalities should be avoided where it was obvious to one and all that products were harmless.
Parliament already took the view at first reading that pointless administrative formalities should be avoided where it was obvious to one and all that products were harmless.
The fact that products in this category are automatically covered by Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety serves in any case to guarantee high health and safety standards.
The fact that products in this category are automatically covered by Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety serves in any case to guarantee high health and safety standards.
In addition, other ‘new concept’ directives, for example Directive 2004/108/EC on electromagnetic compatibility, which has just been revised, are based on exactly the same approach, namely that of not making harmless products subject to superfluous administrative requirements.
In addition, other ‘new concept’ directives, for example Directive 2004/108/EC on electromagnetic compatibility, which has just been revised, are based on exactly the same approach, namely that of not making harmless products subject to superfluous administrative requirements.
Shledá-li členský stát, že strojní zařízení, na něž se tato směrnice vztahuje, opatřená označením CE, doložená ES prohlášením o shodě a používaná v souladu s určeným účelem nebo za podmínek, jež lze důvodně předpokládat, může ohrozit zdraví a bezpečnost osob, a případně domácích zvířat nebo majetku, přijme veškerá vhodná opatření pro stažení tohoto strojního zařízení z trhu, pro zákaz jeho uvedení na trh nebo do provozu či pro omezení jeho volného pohybu.
Where a Member State ascertains that machinery covered by this Directive, bearing the CE marking, accompanied by the EC declaration of conformity and used in accordance with its intended purpose or under conditions which can reasonably be foreseen, is liable to compromise the health and safety of persons and, where appropriate, domestic animals or property, it shall take all appropriate measures to withdraw such machinery from the market, to prohibit the placing on the market and/or putting into service of such machinery or to restrict free movement thereof.
Členské státy, které přijmout tato opatření, neprodleně posílí tržní dohled nad zařízeními, jež vzhledem ke svým technickým vlastnostem představují stejné riziko.
Member States taking such measures shall, without delay, reinforce market surveillance with regard to machinery presenting the same risk by virtue of its technical characteristics.
It seems "common sense" that when a Member State takes measures against machinery because it is liable to compromise health and safety, this Member State immediately increases its market surveillance with regard to machinery of the same type which is equally liable to compromise health and safety.
It seems "common sense" that when a Member State takes measures against machinery because it is liable to compromise health and safety, this Member State immediately increases its market surveillance with regard to machinery of the same type which is equally liable to compromise health and safety.
Such immediate action would significantly speed up the new procedure introduced in the Directive through Article 9 with regard to potentially hazardous machinery, i.e. in response to a justified safeguard clause in one Member State, the Commission requires measures from all Member States.
Such immediate action would significantly speed up the new procedure introduced in the Directive through Article 9 with regard to potentially hazardous machinery, i.e. in response to a justified safeguard clause in one Member State, the Commission requires measures from all Member States.
Jakékoliv jiné označení může být ke strojnímu zařízení připojeno za předpokladu, že tím nebude snížena viditelnost, čitelnost a význam označení CE.
Any other marking may be affixed to the machinery provided that the visibility, legibility and meaning of the CE marking is not thereby impaired.
Je zakázáno připojovat na strojní zařízení označení, která by mohla třetí osoby uvést v omyl, pokud jde o význam nebo tvar označení CE nebo obojí .
The affixing on machinery of markings, signs and inscriptions which are likely to mislead third parties as to the meaning or form of the CE marking , or both, shall be prohibited.
Ensures consistency with the amendment to recital 19.
Ensures consistency with the amendment to recital 19.
ČLÁNEK 27A (nový)
ARTICLE 27 A (new)
V průběhu inspekce provede skupina auditorů přezkoumání technického provedení, aby bylo zaručeno, že zařízení splňuje základní zdravotní a bezpečnostní požadavky.
During the inspection the team of auditors will carry out a technical design review ensuring the compliance of the machine with the essential health and safety requirements.
Účelem přijatých opatření musí být vyloučení každého rizika během předpokládané doby životnosti strojního zařízení, včetně etap dopravy, montáže, demontáže, vyřazování z provozu a šrotování.
The aim of measures taken must be to eliminate any risk throughout the foreseeable lifetime of the machinery including the phases of transport, assembly, dismantling, disabling and scrapping ;
Účelem přijatých opatření musí být vyloučení každého rizika během předpokládané doby životnosti strojního zařízení, včetně etap dopravy, montáže, demontáže a vyřazování z provozu.
The aim of measures taken must be to eliminate any risk throughout the foreseeable lifetime of the machinery including the phases of transport, assembly, dismantling, and disabling;
Scrapping lies outside the control of manufacturers, who should consequently not be made responsible for it.
Scrapping lies outside the control of manufacturers, who should consequently not be made responsible for it.
Strojní zařízení, jeho součásti a příslušenství musí být dostatečně stabilní bez rizika převrácení, pádu nebo nečekaného pohybu během dopravy, montáže, demontáže , šrotování a jiné činnosti týkající se strojního zařízení.
Machinery and its components and fittings must be stable enough to avoid overturning, falling or uncontrolled movements during transportation, assembly, dismantling, scrapping and any other action involving the machinery.
Strojní zařízení, jeho součásti a příslušenství musí být dostatečně stabilní bez rizika převrácení, pádu nebo nečekaného pohybu během dopravy, montáže, demontáže a jiné činnosti týkající se strojního zařízení.
Machinery and its components and fittings must be stable enough to avoid overturning, falling or uncontrolled movements during transportation, assembly, dismantling, and any other action involving the machinery.
– rok výroby, tj. rok, ve kterém byl ukončen výrobní proces.
– the year of construction , i.e. the year in which the manufacturing process is completed .
– rok výroby.
– the year of construction.
Při připojování označení CE je zakázáno antedatovat nebo postdatovat rok výroby strojního zařízení.
It is prohibited to pre-date or post-date the machinery when affixing the CE marking.
Legally speaking, the manufacturer's liability begins when the machine is first placed on the market.
Legally speaking, the manufacturer's liability begins when the machine is first placed on the market.
The objective of marking the year is to determine the responsibility of the manufacturer in terms of the technical regulations in force.
The objective of marking the year is to determine the responsibility of the manufacturer in terms of the technical regulations in force.
Furthermore, this definition could lead to confusion for complex equipment which needs to be assembled on site.
Furthermore, this definition could lead to confusion for complex equipment which needs to be assembled on site.
This requirement would place unnecessary burden on manufacturers without adding value.
This requirement would place unnecessary burden on manufacturers without adding value.
As the contents of the EC declaration of conformity included in the instruction manual cannot be considered a substitute for the EC declaration of conformity itself (which is unique to each specific machine) it has no value to users to whom the instruction manual is addressed.
As the contents of the EC declaration of conformity included in the instruction manual cannot be considered a substitute for the EC declaration of conformity itself (which is unique to each specific machine) it has no value to users to whom the instruction manual is addressed.
Jestliže nejsou použity harmonizované normy, musí se hladiny akustického tlaku měřit metodami nejvhodnějšími pro dané strojní zařízení.
Where the harmonised standards are not applied, sound levels must be measured using the most appropriate method for the machinery.
Jsou-li uvedeny hodnoty emisí hluku, je nutno uvést pro tyto hodnoty nejistotu měření.
Whenever sound emission values are indicated the uncertainties surrounding these values must be specified.
Musí být popsány provozní podmínky u strojního zařízení během měření a použité metody měření.
The operating conditions of the machinery during measurement and the measuring methods used must be described.
The requirement to declare uncertainties is unnecessary and represents a costly burden for manufacturers, in particular SMEs.The meaning of 'uncertainties' is subject to ongoing scientific and academic debate (even notified bodies throughout Europe do not use uniform procedures for determining uncertainty).
The requirement to declare uncertainties is unnecessary and represents a costly burden for manufacturers, in particular SMEs.The meaning of 'uncertainties' is subject to ongoing scientific and academic debate (even notified bodies throughout Europe do not use uniform procedures for determining uncertainty).
As such, it is not easily applied in real life by the manufacturer (especially SMEs) or interpreted by the user.
As such, it is not easily applied in real life by the manufacturer (especially SMEs) or interpreted by the user.
Additionally, requirements for market surveillance are not defined which could lead to considerable distortion of the internal market.
Additionally, requirements for market surveillance are not defined which could lead to considerable distortion of the internal market.
Šestý pododstavec oddílu 1.2.2. o akustických nebo světelných výstražných signálech platí jen pro zpětný chod .
The sixth paragraph of section 1.2.2, concerning acoustic and/or visual warning signals , applies only in the case of reversing .
Šestý pododstavec oddílu 1.2.2. o akustických a/nebo světelných výstražných signálech neplatí pro funkci mobility .
The sixth paragraph of section 1.2.2. concerning acoustic and/or visual warning signals does not apply to mobility function .