natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ownership and partnership are perfectly compatible and should be reconciled with each other in a mature and responsible policy dialogue.
Ownership and partnership are perfectly compatible and should be reconciled with each other in a mature and responsible policy dialogue.
In a partnership , each of the partners is responsible and accountable towards its own constituency (the population of the partner country, c.q. the European taxpayer).
In a partnership , each of the partners is responsible and accountable towards its own constituency (the population of the partner country, c.q. the European taxpayer).
Both of them have a right to determine priorities and modalities for the use of the finances they donate or receive.
Both of them have a right to determine priorities and modalities for the use of the finances they donate or receive.
It is therefore perfectly possible – as many donors do – to enter into a policy dialogue on the basis of a limited set of EU priorities, without infringing the principle of ownership by the partner.
It is therefore perfectly possible – as many donors do – to enter into a policy dialogue on the basis of a limited set of EU priorities, without infringing the principle of ownership by the partner.
The EU has not only the right, but also the duty to clearly define and announce priorities for its cooperation with Africa.
The EU has not only the right, but also the duty to clearly define and announce priorities for its cooperation with Africa.
Our development partners have a right to know what they can expect from us, and for what they should turn to other donors.
Our development partners have a right to know what they can expect from us, and for what they should turn to other donors.
It is therefore difficult to accept the Commission’s argument that deconcentration and devolution of responsibilities to the delegations only allow for priority setting at country level;
It is therefore difficult to accept the Commission’s argument that deconcentration and devolution of responsibilities to the delegations only allow for priority setting at country level;
- Policy decisions should not only be based on macroeconomic indications or strategic geopolitical agendas of the donors, but must in the first place be taken in function of the needs and the requirements to achieve poverty reduction and in function of the absorption capacity and the guarantees for responsible management of aid flows by the recipient country;
- Policy decisions should not only be based on macroeconomic indications or strategic geopolitical agendas of the donors, but must in the first place be taken in function of the needs and the requirements to achieve poverty reduction and in function of the absorption capacity and the guarantees for responsible management of aid flows by the recipient country;
- A clear willingness to help in all circumstances.
- A clear willingness to help in all circumstances.
The modalities of our aid, however, will be determined by the circumstances prevailing in our partner countries or regions.
The modalities of our aid, however, will be determined by the circumstances prevailing in our partner countries or regions.
The Commission, in a proactive way, must clarify the circumstances and conditions for the use of each of the available aid instruments.
The Commission, in a proactive way, must clarify the circumstances and conditions for the use of each of the available aid instruments.
The Commission must assess the use of each of these instruments and their effect on poverty reduction in partner countries.
The Commission must assess the use of each of these instruments and their effect on poverty reduction in partner countries.
Only with a good and independent evaluation (and audit) of our instruments and actions will we be able to adapt ourselves in a flexible, adequate and more effective way to changing circumstances in our partner countries.
Only with a good and independent evaluation (and audit) of our instruments and actions will we be able to adapt ourselves in a flexible, adequate and more effective way to changing circumstances in our partner countries.
This is different from the “ stop and go" development cooperation, which is often a corollary of classical conditionality (for stable countries all possible aid instruments are made available; however, as soon as problems of governance, corruption or human rights appear, donors often react by closing off all aid), which would prevent sustainability and long term planning;
This is different from the “ stop and go" development cooperation, which is often a corollary of classical conditionality (for stable countries all possible aid instruments are made available; however, as soon as problems of governance, corruption or human rights appear, donors often react by closing off all aid), which would prevent sustainability and long term planning;
- In any case, as the Commission itself proposes, aid programmes for Africa must also be geared towards the construction of a reasonably functioning government apparatus – taking simultaneously into account that in many cases this apparatus does not exist at this moment.
- In any case, as the Commission itself proposes, aid programmes for Africa must also be geared towards the construction of a reasonably functioning government apparatus – taking simultaneously into account that in many cases this apparatus does not exist at this moment.
The construction of a functioning state must go hand in hand with support for civil society, in order to ensure the sustainability of the democratisation and institution building process.
The construction of a functioning state must go hand in hand with support for civil society, in order to ensure the sustainability of the democratisation and institution building process.
Therefore, dialogue with civil society, including religious communities and churches, must be deepened – with, certainly in Africa, particular attention to the role of women;
Therefore, dialogue with civil society, including religious communities and churches, must be deepened – with, certainly in Africa, particular attention to the role of women;
- Priority sectors for Community cooperation with Africa must be determined in function of their possible impact on poverty reduction.
- Priority sectors for Community cooperation with Africa must be determined in function of their possible impact on poverty reduction.
The rapporteur suggests that emphasis be put on good governance, capacity building, social infrastructure (especially education and health) economic growth, peace and stability and environment/natural resources;
The rapporteur suggests that emphasis be put on good governance, capacity building, social infrastructure (especially education and health) economic growth, peace and stability and environment/natural resources;
- The rapporteur stresses the need for coordination and leadership in the different policy areas, regions and countries, both between Member States and the Commission and between Member States themselves.
- The rapporteur stresses the need for coordination and leadership in the different policy areas, regions and countries, both between Member States and the Commission and between Member States themselves.
Besides, the Commission should continuously search for its added value in comparison to the Member States and other major donors.
Besides, the Commission should continuously search for its added value in comparison to the Member States and other major donors.
- In order to be effective, the Commission must organize and manage its aid delivery machine (mainly DG DEV and AIDCO) in an efficient way around a limited set of EU priorities.12.
- In order to be effective, the Commission must organize and manage its aid delivery machine (mainly DG DEV and AIDCO) in an efficient way around a limited set of EU priorities.
3. žádá Komisi, aby se v rámci jednání Světové obchodní organizace držela svého ambiciózního plánu jednat o zlepšení přístupu na trh se zemědělskými produkty a co nejdříve odstranit všechny formy vývozních dotací a domácí podpory, která narušuje obchod, a podporovala africké země formou strategie na ochranu jejich zemědělství, dokud nebude plně soběstačné, s cílem zajistit drobným zemědělcům slušný příjem, zvýšit místní produkci, zabezpečit dostatek potravin a přikročit k selektivnímu otevírání trhů, jak tomu bylo v Evropě;
Asks the Commission in the ambit of the WTO negotiations to follow an ambitious agenda to include boosting agricultural market access, to eliminate all forms of export subsidies and trade-distorting domestic support as soon as possible, and to support African countries with a strategy to protect their agriculture up to the point of self-sufficiency, in order to guarantee a decent income for small farmers, increase local production, guarantee food security and proceed to selective market openings, as it has been the case in Europe;
9. připomíná, že jak je uvedeno v deklaraci Světové obchodní organizace z Dohá, v dohodě z Monterrey a v závěrech ze Světového summitu o udržitelném rozvoji konaném v Johannesburgu, měla by být rozvojovým zemím, zejména v Africe, poskytnuta technická pomoc zaměřená na budování institucionální a regulační kapacity nutné k využití výhod mezinárodního obchodu a preferenčního režimu;
Recalls, as established in the WTO Doha Declaration, in the Monterrey Consensus and the conclusions of the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development, that developing countries, especially African ones, should be provided with technical assistance aimed at building the institutional and regulatory capacity required to capture the benefits of international trade and preferential arrangements.
11. vyzývá Komisi a členské státy EU, aby vyřešily naléhavý problém poklesu cen komodit, nabídly, že se budou podílet na financování Mezinárodní pracovní skupiny pro komodity navržené Konferencí OSN o obchodu a rozvoji, a podpořily návrh na okamžitý zásah, který dne 16. června 2005 předložily ve WTO vlády šesti afrických států, které jsou závislé na komoditách;
Calls on the Commission and the EU Member States to address the urgent problem of falling commodity prices, to offer participation in the financing of the International Task Force on Commodities proposed by UNCTAD, and to support the proposal for immediate action by six African Governments whose countries are dependent on commodities, which was submitted to WTO on 16 June 2005;
Rozvojová strategie pro Afriku
A development strategy for Africa
INTA AFET 8.9.2005 8.9.2005
INTA 8.9.2005
Johan Van Hecke 30.8.2005
Johan Van Hecke 30.8.2005
Jean-Pierre Audy, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Nigel Farage, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Alain Lipietz, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Zbigniew Zaleski,
Jean-Pierre Audy, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Nigel Farage, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Alain Lipietz, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Zbigniew Zaleski,
Výbor pro zahraniční věci vyzývá Výbor pro rozvoj jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Development, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
9. zdůrazňuje, že strategie EU v Africe nesmí upevňovat nedemokratické režimy; žádá proto spojené úsilí o účinné nasměrování zvýšené rozvojové pomoci tak, aby došlo ke stabilizaci dotyčných zemích; opakovaně vyjadřuje nutnost vypracovat rozvojovou strategii, která odpovídá konkrétním potřebám dané země a která rozlišuje mezi strukturálně stabilními a křehkými státy;
Stresses that the EU's strategy in Africa must not reinforce undemocratic regimes; calls therefore for concerted efforts to channel the increased development assistance effectively in order to stabilise the respective recipient countries; reiterates the need for a tailor-made development strategy that responds to the special needs of the respective country and that differentiates between structurally stable states and failing states;
11. zdůrazňuje význam, který má zajištění toho, že lidská práva a demokracie v Africe jsou dodržovány, a požaduje, aby EU zvýšila svou podporu ve prospěch demokratických institucí, zejména národních parlamentů, a aby posílila úlohu evropských misí pro sledování voleb a aby náležitě zohlednila závěry těchto misí ve vnějších politikách EU;
Stresses the importance of ensuring that human rights and democracy are respected in Africa and calls on the EU to increase its support for democratic institutions, in particular national parliaments, and to strengthen the role of the European electoral observation missions and duly reflect their conclusions on European external policies;
13. vyzývá EU, aby nadále posilovala svou spolupráci s Africkou unií, a vítá zahrnutí kapitoly o Africe do výsledného dokumentu 60. světového summitu OSN s tím, že bude kladen důraz na význam rozvoje tohoto kontinentu.
Calls on the EU to continue and further strengthen its cooperation with the African Union, and welcomes the inclusion of a chapter on Africa in the outcome document of the 60th UN World Summit, highlighting the importance of that continent's development.
Rozvojová strategie pro Afriku
A Development Strategy for Africa
Tobias Pflüger 20.9.2005
Tobias Pflüger 20.9.2005
Vittorio Agnoletto, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Ryszard Czarnecki, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Francis Wurtz, Josef Zieleniec.
Vittorio Agnoletto, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Ryszard Czarnecki, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Francis Wurtz, Josef Zieleniec.
Rozvojová strategie pro Afriku
a development strategy for Africa
DEV 8.9.2005
DEV 8.9.2005
Výbory požádanýé o stanovisko Datum oznámení na zasedání
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
INTA 8.9.2005
INTA 8.9.2005
Maria Martens 24.5.2005
Maria Martens 24.5.2005
Margrete Auken, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Thierry Cornillet, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Fernando Fernández Martín, Michael Gahler, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Józef Pinior, Toomas Savi, Pierre Schapira, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Mauro Zani.
Margrete Auken, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Thierry Cornillet, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Fernando Fernández Martín, Michael Gahler, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Józef Pinior, Toomas Savi, Pierre Schapira, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Mauro Zani.
PE 362.617v02-00
PE 362.617v02-00
– s ohledem na stanovisko Evropského hospodářského a sociálního výboru,
- having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,
– s ohledem na stanovisko Výboru regionů,
- having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions,
– s ohledem na hodnocení rozvojové politiky ES, které vypracovalo Evropské středisko pro řízení rozvojové politiky, instituce Overseas Development Institute a Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (v únoru roku 2005),
- having regard to the Assessment of the EC Development Policy by European Centre for Development Policy Management, the Overseas Development Institute and the Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (February 2005),
– s ohledem na zprávu OECD/DAC o rozvojové spolupráci Evropského společenství (2002),
- having regard to the OECD/DAC Development Co-operation Review of the European Community (2002),
– s ohledem na římské prohlášení o harmonizaci ze dne 25. února 2003 a na pařížské prohlášení o účinnosti pomoci ze dne 2. března 2005,
- having regard to the Rome Declaration on Harmonization of 25 February 2003 and the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness of 2 March 2005,
– s ohledem na Deklaraci tisíciletí Organizace spojených národů ze dne 8. září 2000, kterou se stanoví rozvojové cíle tisíciletí jako kritéria vypracovaná mezinárodním společenstvím s cílem odstranit chudobu,
- having regard to the United Nations Millennium Declaration of 8 September 2000, which sets out the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as criteria established jointly by the international community for the elimination of poverty,
– s ohledem na následné zprávy o lidském rozvoji vypracované v rámci rozvojového programu Organizace spojených národů,
- having regard to the successive Human Development Reports drawn up by the United Nations Development Programme,
– s ohledem na zprávu vypracovanou v rámci Miléniového hodnocení ekosystémů pod názvem Život nad poměry: Přírodní zdroje a blaho lidstva (2005),
- having regard to the report by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Living Beyond our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being (2005),
– s ohledem na zprávu konference OSN o obchodu a rozvoji (UNCTAD) z roku 2002 – „Nejméně rozvinuté země: uniknout chudobě“,
- having regard to the 2002 Report of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) - "Least Developed Countries: Escaping the Poverty Trap",
– s ohledem na závěrečná prohlášení a závěry mezinárodních konferencí, zejména Mezinárodní konference o financování rozvoje (Monterrey, 2002), světové vrcholné schůzky o udržitelném rozvoji (Johannesburg, 2002), světové vrcholné schůzky o sociálním rozvoji (Kodaň, 1995), třetí Konference Organizace spojených národů o nejméně rozvinutých zemích (Brusel, 2001), čtvrté mnisterské konference Organizace světového obchodu (Doha, 2001), čtvrté Světové konference o ženách (Peking, 1995), Mezinárodní konference o populaci a rozvoji (ICPD) (Káhira, 1994), zvláštního zasedání Valného shromáždění OSN o zhodnocení pokroků dosažených při plnění cílů stanovených na ICPD („Káhira + 5“) v roce 1999, akce „svět vhodný pro děti“ (New York, květen 2002) a Světového fóra o vzdělávání (Dakar, 2000),
- having regard to the final declarations and conclusions of international conferences, in particular the International Conference on Financing for Development (Monterrey, 2002), the World Summit on Sustainable Development (Johannesburg, 2002), the World Summit for Social Development (Copenhagen, 1995), the Third United Nations Conference on the Least Developed Countries (Brussels, 2001), the Fourth World Trade Organization Ministerial Conference (Doha, 2001), the Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing, 1995), the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) (Cairo, 1994), the UN General Assembly's 1999 special session to review progress towards meeting the ICPD goals ("Cairo + 5"), a world fit for children (New York, May 2002) and the World Education Forum (Dakar, 2000),
– s ohledem na závazky, které před konferencí v Monterrey přijala EU na vrcholné schůzce v Barceloně v březnu 2002,
- having regard to the commitments made by the EU at the Barcelona Summit in March 2002 in advance of the Monterrey Conference,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 1. března 2001 o sdělení Komise Radě a Evropskému parlamentu o rozvojové politice Evropského společenství
- having regard to its resolution of 1 March 2001on the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on the European Community's Development Policy,
– s ohledem na prohlášení o rozvojové politice Evropského společenství přijaté Radou a Komisí dne 10. listopadu 2000 (DPS) ,
- having regard to the European Community's Development Policy Statement adopted by the Council and the Commission on 10 November 2000 (DPS) ,
– s ohledem na závěry zasedání Rady pro všeobecné záležitosti a vnější vztahy (GAERC) konaných ve dnech 22.–23. listopadu 2004 a 24. května 2005,
- having regard to the Conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) of 22-23 November 2004, and of 24 May 2005,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 12. dubna 2005 o roli Evropské unie v dosahování rozvojových cílů tisíciletí
- having regard to its resolution of 12 April 2005 on the role of the European Union in the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 8. září 2005 o závažných a zanedbávaných nemocech v rozvojových zemích
- having regard to its resolution of 8 September 2005 on Major and Neglected Diseases in Developing Countries
– s ohledem na zprávu Evropské komise ze dne 29. října 2004 o rozvojových cílech tisíciletí 2000-2004 ( SEC(2004)1379 ),
- having regard to the European Commission Report of 29 October 2004 on the Millennium Development Goals 2000-2004 ( SEC(2004)1379 ),
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise Radě, Evropskému parlamentu a Hospodářskému a sociálnímu výboru ze dne 12. dubna 2005: „Urychlení pokroku směrem k rozvojovým cílům tisíciletí – příspěvek Evropské unie“ ( KOM(2005)0132 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee of 12 April 2005: "Speeding up progress towards the Millennium Development Goals - The European Union's contribution"( COM(2005)0132 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu nazvanou „Investice do rozvoje: praktický plán pro dosažení rozvojových cílů tisíciletí“, kterou vypracovala skupina OSN „UN Millennium Project Task Force“ vedená profesorem Jeffreyem Sachsem,
- having regard to the report by the UN Millennium Project Task Force headed by Professor Jeffrey Sachs: "Investing in Development: a practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals",
– s ohledem na Mnohostranné dohody o životním prostředí (MEA) o změně klimatu, narušení ozonové vrstvy, biologické rozmanitosti, mokřinách, desertifikaci, nebezpečných odpadech a neodstranitelném organickém znečištění;
- having regard to the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) on Climate Change, Depletion of the Ozone Layer, Biological Diversity, Wetlands, Desertification, Hazardeous Wastes and Persistent Organic Pollutants;
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro rozvoj ( A6‑0319/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0319/2005 ),
Evropský konsensus
The European Consensus
2. vítá navrhované společné prohlášení a navrhuje, aby byl jasně stanoven jeho formální statut jako závazný rámec rozvojové politiky Evropské unie a jejích členských států vůči všem rozvojovým zemím podle definice OECD/DAC; dále žádá objasnění toho, jak bude společné prohlášení souviset s finančním nástrojem pro rozvojovou spolupráci;
Welcomes the proposed Joint Declaration and proposes that its formal status be clarified as the binding development policy framework for action by the European Union and its Member States towards all developing countries as defined by OECD/DAC, moreover calls for clarification on how the Joint Declaration will relate to the financing instrument for development cooperation;
7. bere na vědomí, že globalizace doposud stále více zvětšuje propast mezi bohatými a chudými a žádá, aby jedním z budoucích cílů rozvojové politiky byl vyváženější rozvoj;
Takes note of the fact that globalisation so far has widened the gaps between the rich and poor and calls upon the development policy to have a more balanced development as one of its aims in the future;
Cíle a zásady
Objectives and principles