natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
When the health of people and animals is at stake, the veterinary authorities in one Member State must be in a position to identify the parties at risk as soon as they are notified of the outbreak of an infectious veterinary disease in another Member State from which animals have been exported to the first Member State.
When the health of people and animals is at stake, the veterinary authorities in one Member State must be in a position to identify the parties at risk as soon as they are notified of the outbreak of an infectious veterinary disease in another Member State from which animals have been exported to the first Member State.
Animo is the only computer network at EU level which can fulfil this function; the Commission must make the network operate as efficiently as possible in the 25-member EU and ensure that it contains precise, reliable and complete information.
Animo is the only computer network at EU level which can fulfil this function; the Commission must make the network operate as efficiently as possible in the 25-member EU and ensure that it contains precise, reliable and complete information.
While the failings of Animo are more to do with the way the system is used than with the system itself, it must be an absolute first priority to take note of criticisms and to rectify the failings by improving the system, as well as holding courses or sending out guidelines for the optimum use of the network.
While the failings of Animo are more to do with the way the system is used than with the system itself, it must be an absolute first priority to take note of criticisms and to rectify the failings by improving the system, as well as holding courses or sending out guidelines for the optimum use of the network.
Alternative forms of financing
Alternative forms of financing
In the conclusions of the most recent reform of the CAP, adopted in Luxembourg in 2003, the Council had appended to the Commission’s announcement a statement that the Commission would examine specific measures to address risks, crises and natural disasters in agriculture, and submit a report together with proposals to the Council before the end of 2004.
In the conclusions of the most recent reform of the CAP, adopted in Luxembourg in 2003, the Council had appended to the Commission’s announcement a statement that the Commission would examine specific measures to address risks, crises and natural disasters in agriculture, and submit a report together with proposals to the Council before the end of 2004.
No such report has yet been submitted either to the Council or the European Parliament, in spite of the fact that it should have formed the most important basis of the proposals submitted by the Commission on a new financing structure.
No such report has yet been submitted either to the Council or the European Parliament, in spite of the fact that it should have formed the most important basis of the proposals submitted by the Commission on a new financing structure.
The report should contain an examination and analysis of all possible alternative financing possibilities, such as an insurance regulation or a fund financed from the agriculture sector, the Member States and the EU, the Commission investigation should enable a serious political debate to be carried out which can then form the foundation of a decision with a positive effect in the long term too.
The report should contain an examination and analysis of all possible alternative financing possibilities, such as an insurance regulation or a fund financed from the agriculture sector, the Member States and the EU, the Commission investigation should enable a serious political debate to be carried out which can then form the foundation of a decision with a positive effect in the long term too.
A proposal for an altered financing system should also be divided into at least two systems, taking account of the size and extent of the outbreak and the need for action.
A proposal for an altered financing system should also be divided into at least two systems, taking account of the size and extent of the outbreak and the need for action.
Lack of coordination between means and ends
Lack of coordination between means and ends
The Commission’s argument, that the Member States will only do their best to eradicate the disease as quickly as possible if they are given the responsibility of co-financing, does not show any great confidence in the EU veterinary provisions, which in any case contain clear instructions on what guidelines should be followed in the event of an outbreak, including restrictions on the movement and transport of animals.
The Commission’s argument, that the Member States will only do their best to eradicate the disease as quickly as possible if they are given the responsibility of co-financing, does not show any great confidence in the EU veterinary provisions, which in any case contain clear instructions on what guidelines should be followed in the event of an outbreak, including restrictions on the movement and transport of animals.
The Member States’ ability to manage and combat an outbreak of an infectious disease depends from the very first moment on the EU decisions being implemented and the EU instruments being effective.
The Member States’ ability to manage and combat an outbreak of an infectious disease depends from the very first moment on the EU decisions being implemented and the EU instruments being effective.
Here again it must be stressed that the Animo network is the most effective and reliable database permitting the Member States to detect animals from infected areas, so that these animals can be tested and/or slaughtered.
Here again it must be stressed that the Animo network is the most effective and reliable database permitting the Member States to detect animals from infected areas, so that these animals can be tested and/or slaughtered.
The export of fresh meat from the EU to third countries depends on the pinpointing and precise registration of possible infection carriers.
The export of fresh meat from the EU to third countries depends on the pinpointing and precise registration of possible infection carriers.
Greater efforts towards prevention
Greater efforts towards prevention
A great deal more effort should be put into prevention and into stopping the spread of outbreaks.
A great deal more effort should be put into prevention and into stopping the spread of outbreaks.
This can be done by halting all unnecessary transport of animals from one farm to another – since this increases the infection risk in the event of an outbreak – and by introducing a maximum stocking density, thus ensuring that the disease can be effectively combated.
This can be done by halting all unnecessary transport of animals from one farm to another – since this increases the infection risk in the event of an outbreak – and by introducing a maximum stocking density, thus ensuring that the disease can be effectively combated.
With its proposal, the Commission risks creating uncertainty about veterinary status, level of protection and the EU’s commitment to veterinary health.
With its proposal, the Commission risks creating uncertainty about veterinary status, level of protection and the EU’s commitment to veterinary health.
Food production within the EU is particularly vulnerable to the outbreak of infectious diseases, which are outside the control of individual farmers.
Food production within the EU is particularly vulnerable to the outbreak of infectious diseases, which are outside the control of individual farmers.
The proposal would create greater uncertainty about, and fear of, the risk of infection in the EU.
The proposal would create greater uncertainty about, and fear of, the risk of infection in the EU.
The costs to the EU, and to the individual farmer whose herd is hit by an infectious disease, go much further than can be calculated in money terms.
The costs to the EU, and to the individual farmer whose herd is hit by an infectious disease, go much further than can be calculated in money terms.
In addition to the economic and human costs, there may also be losses of genetically valuable animals and breeding stock which cannot be replaced.
In addition to the economic and human costs, there may also be losses of genetically valuable animals and breeding stock which cannot be replaced.
In the light of the above, the Commission’s proposal in its present form must be rejected, and the Commission must be called upon instead to examine alternative financing systems such as the accumulation of a risk fund, insurance regulations, etc., before submitting a new proposal.
In the light of the above, the Commission’s proposal in its present form must be rejected, and the Commission must be called upon instead to examine alternative financing systems such as the accumulation of a risk fund, insurance regulations, etc., before submitting a new proposal.
články 36 a 37 Smlouvy o ES
Articles 36 and 37 EC
Základ v jednacím řádu
Basis in Rules
Niels Busk 23.11.2004
Niels Busk23.11.2004
Filip Adwent, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, María Esther Herranz García, Mairead McGuinness, Neil Parish, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Witold Tomczak, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Janusz Wojciechowski
Filip Adwent, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, María Esther Herranz García, Mairead McGuinness, Neil Parish, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Witold Tomczak, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Janusz Wojciechowski
Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García
Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García,
Agnes Schierhuber ová
Agnes Schierhuber
PE 353.479v02-00
PE 353.479v02-00
Vysvětlení použitých znaků
Symbols for procedures
**II Postup spolupráce (druhé čtení) Většina odevzdaných hlasů pro schválení Společného stanoviska Absolutní většina členů pro zamítnutí nebo změnu Společného stanoviska
**II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
***II Postup spolurozhodování (druhé čtení) Většina odevzdaných hlasů pro schválení Společného stanoviska Absolutní většina členů pro zamítnutí nebo změnu Společného stanoviska
***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
(Uvedení postupu spočívá na právním základě navrženém Komisí.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
Pozměňovací návrhy legislativních textů
Amendments to a legislative text
Změny provedeném Parlamentem jsou zdůrazněny tučně a kurzívou.
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
Jestliže jsou části textů vytištěny slabě a kurzívou, slouží to jako odkaz pro příslušná technická místa na ty části legislativního textu, u kterých se se zřetelem na vyhotovení konečného textu doporučuje korektura (například části textů, které jsou v některé jazykové verzi zjevně chybné nebo úplně chybí).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
Tato doporučení ke korektuře musí schválit příslušná technická místa.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
Návrh legislativního USNESENÍ evropského parlamentu ...........................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................5
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO ROZPOČTOVOU KONTROLU.........................................12
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL .......................................12
Návrh legislativního USNESENÍ evropského parlamentu
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
k návrhu nařízení Rady o financování společné zemědělské politiky
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the financing of the common agricultural policy
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova a na stanovisko Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0127/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6‑0127/2005 ),
Článek 5 písmeno a)
Article 5, point (a)
a) akce nezbytné pro analýzu, řízení, sledování, výměnu informací a provádění společné zemědělské politiky, a rovněž akce zaměřené na zavádění kontrolních systémů a technickou a správní pomoc;
(a) measures required for the analysis, management, monitoring, information exchange and implementation of the common agricultural policy, as well as measures relating to the implementation of control systems and technical and administrative assistance;
a) opatření nezbytn á pro analýzu, řízení, sledování, výměnu informací a provádění společné zemědělské politiky, a rovněž opatření určená pro vytváření kontrolních systémů a technickou a administrativní pomoc, s výjimkou nákladů, které podle článku 13 nenese FEAGA;
(a) measures required for the analysis, management, monitoring, information exchange and implementation of the common agricultural policy, as well as measures relating to the implementation of control systems and technical and administrative assistance , with the exception of expenditure that, pursuant to Article 13, is not to be borne by the EAGF ;
Rozšířením technické pomoci jsou odčerpávány prostředky Společenství pro vlastní účel fondu, podporu zemědělství a rozvoj venkova.
Extending technical assistance will reduce the amount of Community money available for fulfilling the actual purpose of the Funds, namely to promote agriculture and rural development.
To se stěží slučuje s úpravou v článku 13, který stanoví, že FEAGA nenese náklady členských států na správu.
This is inconsistent with the provisions laid down in Article 13 stating that administrative costs incurred by the Member States are not to be borne by the EAGF.
Financování by se tudíž mělo provádět pouze tehdy, když je dodržen článek 13, který stanoví, že výdaje členských států a příjemců na správní a personální náklady nehradí FEAGA, s výhradou výjimek stanovených podle postupu v čl.
Financing should therefore only be provided in so far as Article 13, which lays down that expenditure relating to administrative and personnel costs incurred by Member States and beneficiaries of aid from the EAGF shall not be borne by the Fund, except where provided for under the procedure referred to in Article 41(2), is complied with.
Stávající platné nařízení (ES) č. 1258/1999 stanoví lhůtu 24 měsíců, kterou by bylo rozumné dodržet.
Regulation (EC) 1258/1999 which is in force today provides for 24 months, which should be retained.
Prodloužením této lhůty se zvyšuje byrokratické zatížení.
Extending this period would lead to increased bureaucracy.
c) výdajů týkajících se programů uvedených v článku 4, u nichž platba zůstatku byla provedena více než 36 měsíců před tím, než Komise písemně oznámila příslušnému členskému státu výsledky ověřování.
(c) expenditure on programmes, as indicated in Article 4, payment of the balance of which is made more than thirty-six months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings.
c) výdajů týkajících se programů uvedených v článku 4, u nichž platba zůstatku byla provedena více než 24 měsíců před tím, než Komise písemně oznámila příslušnému členskému státu výsledky ověřování.
(c) expenditure on programmes, as indicated in Article 4, payment of the balance of which is made more than twenty-four months before the Commission notifies the Member State in writing of its inspection findings.
Pokud k vymáhání nedojde ve čtyřleté lhůtě po datu prvotního odhalení ve správním řízení nebo v šesti měsíční lhůtě po zveřejnění konečného soudního rozsudku , ponese finanční důsledky absence vymáhání ve výši 50 % příslušný členský stát a ve výši 50 % rozpočet Společenství, a to po uplatnění srážky stanovené v odstavci 2.
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the primary administrative finding, or within six months after the issue of the final judicial decision, 50% of the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and 50% by the Community budget, after application of the deduction provided for in paragraph 2.
U komplikovaných sporů se může stát, že proces spojený s vymáháním bude trvat mnohem déle než šest (6) let.
In complicated cases the appeals procedure may easily overshoot six (6) years.
Není tedy v těchto případech oprávněné, aby si Komise automaticky ponechala 50 % částek k navrácení, pokud členský stát přijal veškerá opatření spojená s řádnou správou částek přidělovaných Společenstvím.
Under these circumstances, the Commission is not therefore entitled automatically to retain 50% of the costs to be recovered in so far as the Member State has taken all the measures for the proper management of Community funds.
Článek 43
Article 43
Do 1. září každého roku, který následuje po rozpočtovém období, vypracuje Komise finanční zprávu o správě FEAGA a FEADER za uplynulé období.
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall draw up a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year.
Do 1. září každého roku, který následuje po rozpočtovém období, předloží Komise Evropskému parlamentu a Radě finanční zprávu o správě FEAGA a FEADER za uplynulé období.
By 1 September of each year following the budget year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a financial report on the administration of the EAGF and the EAFRD during the previous financial year
As regulation No 1258/1999 on the financing of the Common Agricultural Policy expressly foresees that the financial report be submitted to Parliament and Council, the Commission proposal would represent a step backwards.
As Regulation No 1258/1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy expressly foresees that the financial report be submitted to Parliament and Council, the Commission proposal would represent a step backwards.
Die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik wird bisher durch den Europäischen Ausrichtungs- und Garantiefonds für die Landwirtschaft (EAGLF) finanziert, der in die Abteilung Garantie und die Abteilung Ausrichtung unterteilt ist:
The common agricultural policy (CAP) has hitherto been financed by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), which is divided into Guarantee and Guidance Sections:
· Außerdem finanziert diese Abteilung Maßnahmen für den ländlichen Raum außerhalb der Ziel-1-Regionen.
· This Section also finances rural measures in areas outside Objective 1 regions.
In der derzeit geltenden Finanziellen Vorausschau bilden diese Ausgaben die Rubrik Ib.
In the current financial perspective this expenditure is covered by heading Ib.
· Die Abteilung Ausrichtung finanziert die sonstigen Ausgaben für die ländliche Entwicklung, die nicht vom EGFL, Abteilung Garantie, übernommen werden, also Maßnahmen in Ziel-1-Gebieten und die Leader+-Initiative.
· The Guidance Section finances other rural development expenditure (not financed by the EAGF Guarantee Section), namely measures in Objective 1 regions and the Leader+ initiative.
In der Finanziellen Vorausschau bilden diese Ausgaben einen Teil der Rubrik Ib beziehungsweise II.
In the financial perspective this expenditure comes under heading Ib or heading II.
Der Vorschlag der Kommission
The Commission proposal
Der Vorschlag der Kommission zielt auf eine deutlich vereinfachte Strukturierung der bisherigen Rechtsgrundlagen der Finanzierung, insbesondere im Hinblick auf die Politik der ländlichen Entwicklung in dem Zeitraum 2007-2013.
The objective of the Commission proposal is to clearly simplify the structure of the current legal bases for financing, in particular in the light of rural development policy in the period 2007-2013.
Er enthält darüber hinaus Regeln zur Haushaltsdisziplin und berücksichtigt die Reform der GAP von 2003.
It also contains rules on budgetary discipline and takes account of the 2003 reform of the CAP.
Die Kommission schlägt vor, einen gemeinsamen Rechtsrahmen für die Finanzierung der beiden Komponenten der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP) zu schaffen und dazu zwei Fonds einzurichten:
The Commission is proposing to establish a single legal framework for financing the common agricultural policy and, to that end, to set up two Funds:
· einen Europäischen Garantiefonds für die Landwirtschaft (EGFL) und
· a European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), and
· einen Europäischen Fonds für Landwirtschaft und Landentwicklung (EFLL).
· a European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD).
Der Vorschlag ist in Zusammenhang mit dem Verordnungsentwurf über die Förderung der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums (KOM(2004) 490) zu sehen.
The proposal should be seen in conjunction with the proposal for a regulation on support for rural development (COM(2004)490).
So soll die Finanzierung der zweiten Säule vereinfacht werden.
In future all rural development measures are to be financed under the new EAFRD.
Zusammen mit den Modulationsmitteln aus der 1.
The aim is to simplify the financing of the second pillar.
Säule, die sich aus den Kürzungssätzen nach der Verordnung (EG) 1782/2003 ergeben, soll für den Zeitraum 2007-2013 ein Betrag von 88,753 Mrd. € (in Preisen von 2004) für die EU-27 zur Verfügung stehen.
Along with amounts resulting from modulation, by virtue of payment reductions pursuant to Regulation (EC) 1782/2003, this will mean that a sum of EUR 88 753 000 000 (at 2004 prices) will be available for the period 2007-2013 for the EU-27.
Die Kommission will darüber hinaus ein verschärftes Überwachungs-, Evaluierungs- und Berichterstattungssystem einführen, um sicherzustellen, dass die vereinbarten Obergrenzen eingehalten werden.
In addition, the Commission is proposing to introduce a stricter monitoring, evaluation and reporting system, in order to ensure that agreed ceilings are complied with.
Die neuen Fonds sollen in ihrer Struktur dem EGFL ähneln, d.h.:
The new Funds will be similar in terms of their structure to the EAGF, namely involving:
· Verwaltung der Fonds durch einen Ausschuss, der sich aus Vertretern der Mitgliedstaaten und der Kommission zusammensetzt (Artikel 41, Fondsausschuss)
· Management of the Funds by a committee made up of representatives of the Member States and the Commission (Article 41, Committee on the funds)
· Anwendung des Rechnungsabschlussverfahrens für alle aus den neuen Fonds finanzierten Maßnahmen (bisher war dies nur bei den Maßnahmen der Abteilung Garantie der Fall, während Maßnahmen, die durch die Abteilung Ausrichtung finanziert wurden, im Rahmen der mehrjährigen Förderprogramme überprüft wurden).
· Use of the clearance of accounts procedure for all measures financed by the new Funds (hitherto this has only applied to measures under the Guarantee Section, whilst measures financed by the Guidance Section have been scrutinised within the framework of multiannual support programmes).
Andererseits sollen die beiden Fonds auch bisherige Besonderheiten behalten:
On the other hand, the two Funds will also maintain some specific features:
· Der EGFL verfügt über nicht getrennte Mittel, während der EFLL mit getrennten Mitteln arbeitet, für die die Regel n + 2, gefolgt von einer automatischen Aufhebung der Mittelbindungen, bestätigt wird.
· The EAGF has non-differentiated appropriations, while the EAFRD has differentiated appropriations, regarding which the N+2 rule followed by automatic decommitment is maintained.