natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
First of all, Member States which have not yet completed transposition of the framework are asked to do so immediately; in cases where the regulatory framework has been transposed but not correctly applied, Member States are asked to comply immediately with the relevant Community provisions.
First of all, Member States which have not yet completed transposition of the framework are asked to do so immediately; in cases where the regulatory framework has been transposed but not correctly applied, Member States are asked to comply immediately with the relevant Community provisions.
With regard to the National Regulatory Authorities (NRA), Member States are asked to provide adequate support, bearing in mind that the limited resources at their disposal are frequently a cause of delays in completing the tasks entrusted to them under the legislation in this sector.
With regard to the National Regulatory Authorities (NRA), Member States are asked to provide adequate support, bearing in mind that the limited resources at their disposal are frequently a cause of delays in completing the tasks entrusted to them under the legislation in this sector.
At the same time, the Member States are asked to take the measures necessary to speed up procedures for appeals against NRA decisions.
At the same time, the Member States are asked to take the measures necessary to speed up procedures for appeals against NRA decisions.
On the subject of the various problems encountered by the Commission described above, the rapporteur calls on the Member States to comply with the principles of transparency and proportionality and to justify the administrative charges imposed on operators for authorisation of services.
On the subject of the various problems encountered by the Commission described above, the rapporteur calls on the Member States to comply with the principles of transparency and proportionality and to justify the administrative charges imposed on operators for authorisation of services.
Emphasis is also placed on the importance of open, transparent and non-discriminatory procedures for the allocation of radio frequencies and the granting of licences.
Emphasis is also placed on the importance of open, transparent and non-discriminatory procedures for the allocation of radio frequencies and the granting of licences.
More specifically, on the question of the development of third generation mobile telephony, the rapporteur points to the barriers created by national and local provisions with regard to authorisations for establishing infrastructures and the strict criteria for granting licences.
More specifically, on the question of the development of third generation mobile telephony, the rapporteur points to the barriers created by national and local provisions with regard to authorisations for establishing infrastructures and the strict criteria for granting licences.
The competent authorities are therefore asked to remedy this state of affairs by adopting measures more favourable to investment on the part of operators, with due regard, however, for the protection of public health and the environment.
The competent authorities are therefore asked to remedy this state of affairs by adopting measures more favourable to investment on the part of operators, with due regard, however, for the protection of public health and the environment.
The rapporteur points out that the information and communications technology sector is a driving force behind the European economy, contributing significantly to growth and job creation.
The rapporteur points out that the information and communications technology sector is a driving force behind the European economy, contributing significantly to growth and job creation.
In the light of this, she shares the belief that regulatory intervention should focus on removing distortions which prevent fair competition.
In the light of this, she shares the belief that regulatory intervention should focus on removing distortions which prevent fair competition.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Member States, the Commission and the NRAs take account of the need for the regulatory framework to attract and safeguard investments in the wider sense, particularly as regards investment in infrastructure for broadband, third generation mobile telephony and other emerging markets.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Member States, the Commission and the NRAs take account of the need for the regulatory framework to attract and safeguard investments in the wider sense, particularly as regards investment in infrastructure for broadband, third generation mobile telephony and other emerging markets.
The rapporteur stresses the need to protect consumers, as provided for in European legislation on electronic communications.
The rapporteur stresses the need to protect consumers, as provided for in European legislation on electronic communications.
In this connection, operators are reminded of their duty to adopt transparent practices with regard to services and pricing and to provide consumers with clearer information.
In this connection, operators are reminded of their duty to adopt transparent practices with regard to services and pricing and to provide consumers with clearer information.
This applies particularly to the market in mobile telephony and the costs of international roaming.
This applies particularly to the market in mobile telephony and the costs of international roaming.
Finally, the rapporteur commends the Commission on the initiative taken by Commissioner Reding regarding transparency in the international roaming sector.
Finally, the rapporteur commends the Commission on the initiative taken by Commissioner Reding regarding transparency in the international roaming sector.
This will provide consumers with useful information on the retail tariffs applied by mobile telephony operators in the various EU countries.
This will provide consumers with useful information on the retail tariffs applied by mobile telephony operators in the various EU countries.
k předpisovému rámci a trhům elektronických komunikací v Evropě 2004
on European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004
Výbor pro právní záležitosti vyzývá Výbor pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. připomíná, že se v členských státech vyskytly a nadále přetrvávají potíže s uplatňováním nového regulačního rámce, čemuž by Komise měla věnovat více pozornosti.
Points out that there have been, and still are, problems with the implementation of the new regulatory framework in the Member States to which the Commission should pay greater attention.
4. vyzývá Komisi, aby zvážila revizi seznamu relevantních trhů s cílem stanovit minimální počet trhů; pozornost by se měla obrátit od historických přežitků na trhu (např. pronajatých linek) na skutečně problematická místa;
Invites the Commission to consider a review of the list regarding the relevant markets with the aim of establishing a minimum set of markets; the focus should be shifted from historical remains in the market (i.e. leased lines) to real bottle-necks;
6. navrhuje, že v zájmu rozvoje trhu je nezbytně nutné ustoupit od čistě cenové regulace, neboť ta může narušit dynamiku trhu, přičemž zohlední předchozí analýzu trhu;
Suggests that for the sake of market development, it is crucial to move away from pure price regulation as this may distort the dynamics of the market , taking into account a previous market analysis;
9. zdůrazňuje, že přenosnost telefonních čísel je zásadní pro zdravou konkurenci mezi mobilními operátory, a proto zdůrazňuje, že poplatky za převedení čísla by měly být ve všech členských státech nízké nebo nulové a že lhůta na provedení převodu čísla by měla být v některých členských státech zkrácena;
Points out that a functioning mobile number portability system is vital to healthy competition between mobile operators and stresses therefore that the charges for porting numbers should be set at a low level, or at zero, in every Member State, and that the period for carrying out the number portability operation should be shortened in some Member States;
15. naléhavě žádá Komisi, aby se zasadila o snížení poplatků za mezinárodní roaming, o zvýšení průhlednosti mezinárodních ceníků pro zákazníky a tak o posílení mobility a řádného fungování vnitřního trhu; vítá předběžné stanovisko Komise k porušování pravidel hospodářské soutěže dvěma mobilními operátory ze Spojeného království a očekává výsledek tohoto řízení;
Urges the Commission to act to lower international roaming charges, increase the transparency of international pricing for customers and hence enhance mobility and the proper functioning of the internal market; welcomes the Commission’s preliminary position on infringements of the competition rules by two of the UK mobile networks operators and awaits the outcome of this procedure;
20. zdůrazňuje význam příslušných pravidel pro udělování práv instalovat stožáry a antény pro poskytování mobilních služeb; bere na vědomí rozpor mezi stanovenou povinností při uvádění na trh a často dlouhotrvajícími místními postupy udělování práv na instalaci; vyzývá členské státy, aby zvážily zavedení veřejně přístupné databáze umístění stávajících a budoucích zařízení;
Stresses the importance of the relevant regulation on granting rights to install masts and antennae for the provision of mobile services; notes the contradiction between the roll-out obligations imposed and the often lengthy local procedures for granting installation rights; calls on the Member States to consider setting up a publicly available database of current and future locations;
Předpisový rámec a trhy elektronických komunikací v Evropě 2004
European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004
JURI 12.5.2005
JURI 12.5.2005
Piia-Noora Kauppi 21.4.2005
Piia-Noora Kauppi 21.4.2005
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Nicole Fontaine, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega
Nicole Fontaine, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Manuel Medina Ortega
ITRE 12.5.2005
ITRE 12.5.2005
Výbory požádané o stanovisko Datum oznámení n zasedání
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
Patrizia Toia 17.3.2005
Patrizia Toia 17.3.2005
Ivo Belet, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lorenzo Cesa, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Vincenzo Lavarra, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
Ivo Belet, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lorenzo Cesa, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Vincenzo Lavarra, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
PE 362.877v02-00
PE 362.877v02-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................5
o návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005, oddíl IV - Soudní dvůr – Zřízení Soudu pro veřejnou službu
on Draft amending budget No 6/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, Section IV - Court of Justice - Establishment of the Civil Service Tribunal
– s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii, a zejména na článek 177 této smlovy,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,,
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 7/2005 Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005, který předložila Komise dne 5. září 2005 ( KOM(2005)0419 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 7/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, which the Commission presented on 5 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0419 ),
– s ohledem na návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 sestavený Radou dne 3. října 2005 (12180/2005 – C6‑0304/2005 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2005, which the Council established on 3 October 2005 (12180/2005 – C6‑0304/2005 ),
– s ohledem na článek 69 a přílohu IV jednacího řádu,
– having regard to Rule 69 and Annex IV of its Rules of Procedure,
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0306/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0306/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že Rada rozhodla o zřízení Soudu pro veřejnou službu,
A. whereas the Council has decided to establish the Civil Service Tribunal,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že zahájení činnosti Soudu pro veřejnou službu bylo přesunuto na rok 2005,
B. whereas the date for the Civil Service Tribunal to become operational was brought forward to 2005,
On 2 November 2004, the Council established the Civil Service Tribunal, which is composed of seven judges.
On 2 November 2004, the Council established the Civil Service Tribunal, which is composed of seven judges.
The Council appointed the seven judges by decision of 22 July 2005 and fixed 1 October 2005 as the date on which they would take up their duties.
The Council appointed the seven judges by decision of 22 July 2005 and fixed 1 October 2005 as the date on which they would take up their duties.
The posts for the Civil Service Tribunal were included in the estimates of the Court of Justice for 2006, as at the time it was thought that the Civil Service Tribunal would become operational in the beginning of 2006.
The posts for the Civil Service Tribunal were included in the estimates of the Court of Justice for 2006, as at the time it was thought that the Civil Service Tribunal would become operational in the beginning of 2006.
Following the decision to bring forward the date when the judges take up their duties to 1 October 2005, an amending budget on the 2005 budget was presented on 5 September 2005.
Following the decision to bring forward the date when the judges take up their duties to 1 October 2005, an amending budget on the 2005 budget was presented on 5 September 2005.
This amending budget proposes to create in the 2005 establishment plan of the Court of Justice 26 new posts.
This amending budget proposes to create in the 2005 establishment plan of the Court of Justice 26 new posts.
The requested 26 posts for the Civil Service Tribunal consist of the staff for the Judges’ cabinets , i.e. a Legal Secretary and an assistant attached to each Judge, a reader of judgments and an assistant in the President’s cabinet (16 temporary posts: 2 A*14, 2 A*12, 3 A*11, 1 A*10, 1 B*5 and 7 B*3) and the staff for the Registry (10 permanent posts: 1 A*5, 5 B*3 and 4 C*1).
The requested 26 posts for the Civil Service Tribunal consist of the staff for the Judges’ cabinets , i.e. a Legal Secretary and an assistant attached to each Judge, a reader of judgments and an assistant in the President’s cabinet (16 temporary posts: 2 A*14, 2 A*12, 3 A*11, 1 A*10, 1 B*5 and 7 B*3) and the staff for the Registry (10 permanent posts: 1 A*5, 5 B*3 and 4 C*1).
Appropriations are requested to be entered in the 2005 budget to pay the seven new Judges of the Tribunal, its Registrar and the 26 new posts during the last three months of 2005.
Appropriations are requested to be entered in the 2005 budget to pay the seven new Judges of the Tribunal, its Registrar and the 26 new posts during the last three months of 2005.
The appropriations are available in the 2005 budget of the Court of Justice.
The appropriations are available in the 2005 budget of the Court of Justice.
On 3 October 2005, the Council adopted its first reading of Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) No 7/2005.
On 3 October 2005, the Council adopted its first reading of Preliminary Draft Amending Budget (PDAB) No 7/2005.
It will thus become Draft Amending Budget (DAB) No 6/2005.
It will thus become Draft Amending Budget (DAB) No 6/2005.
The Council proposes to create 18 posts out of the 26 posts requested and did not accept the request for 8 posts (2 B*3, 2 C*1 and 4 B*3T posts).
The Council proposes to create 18 posts out of the 26 posts requested and did not accept the request for 8 posts (2 B*3, 2 C*1 and 4 B*3T posts).
It is estimated that the Civil Service Tribunal will start with a caseload of 120-150 cases, depending on the final transfer of pending cases from the Court of First Instance.
It is estimated that the Civil Service Tribunal will start with a caseload of 120-150 cases, depending on the final transfer of pending cases from the Court of First Instance.
The annual number of new cases is expected to amount to around 150.
The annual number of new cases is expected to amount to around 150.
It is therefore considered that all 26 posts would be needed from the outset and that it is not possible to redeploy any of the posts from the Court of First Instance without depriving that Court of the resources needed for its functioning.
It is therefore considered that all 26 posts would be needed from the outset and that it is not possible to redeploy any of the posts from the Court of First Instance without depriving that Court of the resources needed for its functioning.
Návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005, oddíl IV - Soudní dvůr – Zřízení Soudu veřejné služby
Draft amending budget No 6/2003 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, Section IV – Court of Justice - Establishment of the Civil Service Tribunal
Anne Elisabet Jensen 20.9.2004
Anne Elisabet Jensen 20.9.2004
No 7/2005 – COM(2005)0419
No 7/2005 – COM(2005)0419
PE 362.760v03-00
PE 362.760v03-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................12
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................12
STANOVISKO Výboru pro mezinárodní obchod .................................................29
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................29
STANOVISKO Výboru pro rozpočtovou kontrolu ..........................................31
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................32
STANOVISKO Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci 34
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 35
STANOVISKO PETIČNÍHO VÝBORU ..................................................................................36
OPINION of the committee on petitions ...............................................................37
–...Rozhodnutí přijatá Rozpočtovým výborem na schůzích ve dnech 4-6. října o předlohách změn k oddílům I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII A a VIII B návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu
–...Decisions taken by the Committee on Budgets at its meetings of 4-6 October 2005 on the draft amendments to Sections I, II, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII(A) and VIII(B) of the draft general budget
o návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, oddíl I – Evropský parlament, oddíl II – Rada, oddíl IV – Soudní dvůr, oddíl V – Účetní dvůr, oddíl VI – Evropský hospodářský a sociální výbor, oddíl VII – Výbor regionů, oddíl VIII A – Evropský veřejný ochránce práv, oddíl VIII B – Evropský inspektor ochrany údajů ( C6‑0300/2005 – 2005/2002(BUD) )
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII(A) – European Ombudsman, Section VIII(B) – European Data Protection Supervisor ( C6‑0300/2005 – 2005/2002(BUD) )
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 9. března 2005 o pokynech pro oddíly II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII-(A) a VIII-(B) a k předběžnému odhadu příjmů a výdajů Parlamentu (oddíl I) pro rozpočtový proces pro rok 2006
– having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2005 on the guidelines for Sections II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII(A) and VIII(B) and on the European Parliament's preliminary draft estimates (Section I) for the 2006 budget procedure
Texty přijaté tohoto dne , P6_TA(2005)0067 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0067 . ,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 12. května 2005 o odhadu příjmů a výdajů Parlamentu na rozpočtový rok 2006 ( 2005/2012(BUD) )
– having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the estimates of revenue and expenditure of Parliament for the financial year 2006 ( 2005/2012(BUD) )
Texty přijaté tohoto dne , P6_TA(2005)0181 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0181 . ,
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, který předložila Komise dne 27. dubna 2005 ( KOM(2005)0300 ),
– having regard to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 27 April 2005 ( COM(2005)0300 ),
– s ohledem na návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, který sestavila Rada dne 15. července 2005 ( C6‑0300/2005 ),
– having regard to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Council established on 15 July 2005 ( C6‑0300/2005 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru a na stanoviska Výboru pro mezinárodní obchod, Výboru pro rozpočtovou kontrolu, Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci a Petičního výboru ( A6‑0307/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade, Committee on Budgetary Control,, Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and Committee on Petitions ( A6‑0307/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že současný finanční výhled stanoví strop pro okruh 5 (Správa) na rozpočtový rok 2006 ve výši 6 708 milionů EUR v současných cenách,
A. whereas the current financial perspective has set the ceiling for heading 5 (Administrative expenditure) for the financial year 2006 at EUR 6 708 million at current prices,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že předběžný návrh rozpočtu sestavený Radou ponechal pod stropem okruhu 5 finančního výhledu pro rozpočtový rok 2006 prostor ve výši přibližně 10,2 milionu EUR,
B. whereas the preliminary draft budget (PDB) for 2006 left a margin of around EUR 10,2 million below the ceiling of heading 5 of the financial perspective for the financial year 2006,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že návrh rozpočtu sestavený Radou ponechal pod stropem okruhu 5 finančního výhledu pro rozpočtový rok 2006 prostor ve výši přibližně 130,1 milionu EUR, což znamená snížení výdajů o 119,9 milionu EUR,
C. whereas the Council's draft budget (DB) left a margin of around EUR 130,1 million below the ceiling of heading 5 for 2006, thus decreasing the expenditure by EUR -119,9 million,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že odhady Parlamentu dosáhly výše 1 341,6 milionu EUR, což odpovídá maximální výši 20 % okruhu 5;
D. whereas Parliament's estimates were set at EUR 1 341,6 million, corresponding to the maximum level of 20% of heading 5,
2. vyzývá všechny instituce, aby využívaly dostupné prostředky racionálně v zájmu zvýšení efektivity svých hlavních aktivit a pro dosažení prioritních cílů, které si vytkly;
Invites all institutions to use the available appropriations in a rational way for improving the effectiveness of their core activities and for the accomplishment of the priorities they have set;