natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komise co nejdříve informuje přijímající zemi o všech rozhodnutích přijatých v souladu s články 19, 20 nebo 21 před tím, než nabudou účinku.
The Commission shall inform the beneficiary country concerned as soon as possible of any decision taken in accordance with Articles 19, 20 or 21 before it becomes effective.
Komise rovněž uvědomí Radu , Evropský parlament a členské státy.
The Commission shall also notify the Council , the European Parliament and the Member States thereof.
Členský stát sdělí rozhodnutí učiněné v souladu s články 19, 20 nebo 21 Radě do deseti dnů.
Any Member State may refer a decision taken in accordance with Articles 19, 20 or 21 to the Council within ten days.
Rada může kvalifikovanou většinou do 30 dnů přijmout jiné rozhodnutí.
The Council, acting by qualified majority, may adopt a different decision within 30 days.
Rada může kvalifikovanou většinou do 30 dnů přijmout jiné rozhodnutí poté, co informuje Evropský parlament .
The Council, acting by qualified majority, may adopt a different decision within 30 days , after informing the European Parliament .
Komise bude v těsné spolupráci se členskými státy monitorovat dovozy produktů kódu KN 0803 00 19, položek 0603, 1006 a 1701 celního sazebníku a kódů KN 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39, 1604 20 70 , 1604 14 16 a 1604 19 31 za účelem určení, zda jsou splněny podmínky uvedené v článcích 20 a 21.
The Commission shall, in close cooperation with Member States, monitor the imports of products of CN code 0803 00 19, of tariff headings 0603, 1006, and 1701 and of CN codes 1604 14 11, 1604 14 18, 1604 14 90, 1604 19 39 , 1604 20 70 , 1604 14 16 and 1604 19 31 in order to determine whether the conditions referred to in Articles 20 and 21 are fulfilled.
Je nezbytné zařadit tyto položky týkající se filé z tuňáka známého jako „hřbety“ a zpracovaných výrobků do článku 25, aby se na ně vztahovalo příslušné monitorování a následné procedury, protože se jedná o velice citlivé výrobky.
The inclusion in Article 25 of these sections referring to tuna ribs and processed products, so that they are covered by its monitoring and follow-up procedures, is necessary because these are extremely sensitive products.
Článek 25a (nový)
Article 25 a (new)
Článek 25a
Article 25a
Komise bude Evropský parlament pravidelně prověřovat o :
The Commission shall keep Parliament periodically informed with regard to:
a) obchodní statistice mezi Evropskou unií a zeměmi, které byly zvýhodněny na základě systému preferencí;
(a) trade statistics between the European Union and GSP beneficiary countries;
b) stavu ratifikace a provádení úmluv uvedených v příloze III ze strany každé ze zemí využívajících zvláštní pobídkové režimy.
(b) the status of ratification and implementation of the conventions included in Annex III by each country benefitting from the special incentive arrangement.
Ve vhodných případech začlení Komise doporučení s ohledem na to, zda by konkrétní země měly přijmout dodatečné kroky k účinnému provádění úmluv;
Where appropriate, the Commission will include recommendations on whether additional steps for the effective implementation of a convention should be taken by a specific country;
c) důležité informace o tom, jak se daří plnit rozvojové cíle tisíciletí, především v nejméně rozvinutých zemích.
(c) relevant information on progress towards the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals, especially in Least Developed Countries.
V prvním čtvrtletí roku 2007 Komise vypracuje analýzu dopadu všeobecného sysstému preferencí, která se bude zabývat obdobím od 1. července 2005 do 1. ledna 2007.
The Commission shall prepare an impact assessment study of the effects of the GSP covering the period from 1 July 2005 to 1 January 2007.
Tuto studii předá výboru, Evropskému parlamentu a Sociálnímu výboru do 1. března 2007.
The study shall be transmitted to the Committee, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee by 1 March 2007.
Komise po konzultaci s v ýborem stanoví obsah hodnotící studie uvedené v odstavci 2, která bude obsahovat názory zvýhodněných zemí a v každém případě bude obsahovat alespoň následující body :
The Commission, after consulting the Committee, will set the contents of the impact-assessment study referred to in paragraph2, which shall include the views of the beneficiary countries and in any event shall contain at least the following elements:
- hloubkovou statistickou analýzu míry využití VSP podle zemí a odvětví, včetně srovnání s předcházejícími lety ;
- an in-depth statistical analysis of GSP utilisation rates per country and section including a comparison with previous years;
- hodnocení sociálních účinků klasifikačního systému a jeho účinků na obchod v zemích zařazených do klasifikace;
- an evaluation of the social and trade-related effects of graduation on graduated countries;
- předběžné hodnocení dopadů budoucího odstupňování na země, které budou pravděpodobně odstupňovány v následujícím nařízení ;
- a preliminary assessment of the effects of future graduation on the countries likely to be graduated under the next regulation;
- srovnávací studii zvýhodněného zacházení, které VSP a Dohoda z Cotonou mezi AKT a EU nabízí africkým, karibským a tichomořským zemím, s ohledem na to, aby jim bylo podle revizdovaného nařízení poskytnuto alespoň stejně zvýhodněné zacházení jako podle Dohody z Cotonou ;
- a comparative study of the preferential treatment offered by the GSP and the ACP-EU Cotonou Agreement to ACP countries, with a view to providing them, in a revised regulation, with at least an equivalent preferential treatment to the one they were granted under the Cotonou Agreement;
- analýzu možných dopadů posílení systému preferencí zvýšením preferenčního rozpětí plánovaného pro citlivé produkty a/nebo zařazením „citlivých“ produktů do kategorie produktů, které „nejsou citlivé“ ;
- an analysis of the potential effects of extending the system of preferences by increasing the preferential margin accorded for sensitive products and/or transferring 'sensitive' products to the 'non-sensitive' category;
- hodnocení toho, jak toto nařízení přispívá k plnění rozvojových cílů tisíciletí, především ve vztahu k nejméně rozvinutým zemím .
- an evaluation of the contribution of this regulation to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), in particular in relation to LDCs.
Komise předloží Evropskému parlamentu u příležitosti ukončení jednání v Dauhá zvláštní zprávu, ve které prozkoumá vliv jednání na systém preferencí stanovený v tomto nařízení, a uvede, jaká opatření je nutno přijmout k zajištění účinnosti systému všeobecných preferencí .
The Commission shall submit a special report to the European Parliament at the conclusion of the Doha Round, examining the impact of the negotiations on the scheme established in this Regulation and considering the measures to be adopted to ensure the effectiveness of the generalised system of preferences.
Článek 26 odst.
Article 26, paragraph 3
Výbor přezkoumá účinky systému všeobecných celních preferencí Evropského společenství na základě studie hodnotící dopad uvedené v článku 25a .
The Committee shall examine the effects of the Community scheme of generalised tariff preferences, on the basis of the impact-assessment study referred to in Article 25a.
Pro adekvátní revizi nařízení v roce 2008 je nezbytné uskutečnit dobrou studii hodnotící dopad, která by zhodnotila fungování systému v období 2005 až 2007.
In order to adequately review the Regulation in 2008, a good impact-assessment study on the functioning of the system during the period 2005 to 2007 is necessary.
Toto nařízení vstupuje v platnost dnem 1. dubna 2005.
This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 April 2005.
Nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2501/2001 se zrušuje s účinkem ode dne 1. dubna 2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005.
Nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2501/2001 se až na odstavec 1a zrušuje s účinkem ode dne 1. dubna 2005.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 is repealed with effect from 1 April 2005 without prejudice to paragraph 1a .
Viz pozměňovací návrh k 4. bodu odůvodnění.
See amendment to Recital 4.
Ustanovení hlavy II oddíl 2 a 4, hlavy III oddílu 1 a 2, a hlavy IV nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2501/2001 zůstávají v platnosti až do zveřejnění seznamu zvýhodněných zemí, které jsou oprávněny čerpat výhody v rámci zvláštního motivačního režimu v souladu s oddílem 2 tohoto nařízení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.
Sections 2 and 4 of Title II, Sections 1 and 2 of Title III, and Title IV of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of the list of the beneficiary countries entitled to benefit from the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
Zvláštní motivační režim v souladu s nařízením Rady (ES) č. 2501/2001 zůstává v platnosti pro zvýhodněné země, které nejsou uvedeny v seznamu zemí a které jsou oprávněny čerpat výhody v rámci zvláštního motivačního režimu v souladu s oddílem II tohoto nařízení do 31. prosince 2005.
The special incentive arrangements provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 shall remain applicable until 31 December 2005 to the beneficiary countries that are not included in the list of beneficiary countries for the special incentive arrangement provided for in Section 2 of this Regulation.
Toto ustanovení umožňuje vznik mezery v zákoně pro zvýhodněné země během přechodného období mezi zrušením předcházejícího zvláštního motivačního režimu a vstupem v platnost nového.
This provision presents the possibility of a loophole for beneficiary countries in the interim period between the repeal of the previous special incentive arrangements and the entry into force of the new one.
Též by mohlo umožnit včasné zavedení nového nařízení v souladu s pozměňovacím návrhem 2, aby bylo možno zaručit zásadu oprávněné důvěry a řádné správy a zabránit nežádoucím a nechtěným škodám pro zvýhodněné země a hospodářské subjekty.
This could also facilitate an early application of the new Regulation in accordance with Amendment 2 in order to guarantee the principle of legitimate trust and sound administration, and in order to prevent undesirable and unwanted damage to beneficiary countries and economic operators.
Revidované nařízení by v zájmu dodržení požadavku roční předvídatelnosti, kladeného přijímajícími zeměmi a ekonomickými subjekty, mělo být schváleno do 1. ledna 2008.
In order to comply with the requirement of one-year predictability requested by beneficiary countries and economic operators, the revised Regulation should be approved by 1 January 2008.
Aby mohla proběhnout smysluplná konzultace s Evropským parlamentem a příslušnými záinteresovanými skupinami, musí být návrh předložen nejméně šest měsíců předem (1. června 2007).
In order to allow for a meaningful consultation with the European Parliament and relevant stakeholders, the proposal should be issued at least six months in advance (1 June 2007).
Toto načasování umožní Komisi začlenit zjištění hodnotící studie, která bude zveřejněna nejpozději 1. března 2007.
This timing enables the Commission to incorporate the findings of the impact-assessment study, which shall be published by 1 March 2007.
Toto načasování zpráv a revizí by mělo být v ideálním případě začleněno i do budoucích nařízení.
Ideally this timing of reporting and revision should be incorporated in future Regulations.
On 20 October 2004, in anticipation of the expiry on 31 December 2005 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 applying a multiannual scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP), and following the adoption in July 2004 of the Guidelines on the Role of the GSP for the next 10 year period, 2006-2015 ( COM(2004)0461 ), the Commission published a first proposal for a first Council regulation applying the new GSP (COM (2004)699).
On 20 October 2004, in anticipation of the expiry on 31 December 2005 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 applying a multiannual scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP), and following the adoption in July 2004 of the Guidelines on the Role of the GSP for the next 10 year period, 2006-2015 ( COM(2004)0461 ), the Commission published a first proposal for a first Council regulation applying the new GSP (COM (2004)699).
Before the proposal for a regulation was published, Parliament responded to the Communication of 7 July on the new guidelines for the GSP for the 10 year period 2005-2015 with two oral questions (to the Commission and the Council), tabled on behalf of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Development, followed by a debate (at its sitting of 14 October) and a resolution adopted by a broad majority
Before the proposal for a regulation was published, Parliament responded to the Communication of 7 July on the new guidelines for the GSP for the 10 year period 2005-2015 with two oral questions (to the Commission and the Council), tabled on behalf of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Development, followed by a debate (at its sitting of 14 October) and a resolution adopted by a broad majority
Following the disaster caused by the tsunami, and when the procedure for consulting the European Parliament was nearing its conclusion, the Commission decided on 10 February 2005 to submit a fresh, amended proposal for a GSP regulation (COM(2005) 043) which, among other changes, brings forward the entry into force of the new scheme to 1 April 2005.
Following the disaster caused by the tsunami, and when the procedure for consulting the European Parliament was nearing its conclusion, the Commission decided on 10 February 2005 to submit a fresh, amended proposal for a GSP regulation (COM(2005) 043) which, among other changes, brings forward the entry into force of the new scheme to 1 April 2005.
The European Parliament has monitored the reform of the system, including the amended proposal, in detail, with great interest and with the greatest possible degree of flexibility, and has been involved from the outset in an attempt to ensure that the process benefits from greater transparency and democratic control.
The European Parliament has monitored the reform of the system, including the amended proposal, in detail, with great interest and with the greatest possible degree of flexibility, and has been involved from the outset in an attempt to ensure that the process benefits from greater transparency and democratic control.
This report is therefore the culmination of long parliamentary work on a subject that is of key importance to the EU’s relations with the rest of the world.
This report is therefore the culmination of long parliamentary work on a subject that is of key importance to the EU’s relations with the rest of the world.
The GSP therefore needs to be consistent with development policy objectives and compatible with the Doha Programme.
The GSP therefore needs to be consistent with development policy objectives and compatible with the Doha Programme.
Regrettably, and contrary to the wishes expressed by Parliament in its resolution P6_TA‑(2004)0024 (Paragraph 21), the Commission did not begin the consultation process on the first GSP implementing regulation sufficiently in advance to enable the partner countries, civil society representatives and the EU Institutions, including the European Parliament, to take part and be fully consulted within a reasonable timescale.
Regrettably, and contrary to the wishes expressed by Parliament in its resolution P6_TA‑(2004)0024 (Paragraph 21), the Commission did not begin the consultation process on the first GSP implementing regulation sufficiently in advance to enable the partner countries, civil society representatives and the EU Institutions, including the European Parliament, to take part and be fully consulted within a reasonable timescale.
Your rapporteur wishes to stress that, leaving aside the understandable urgency with which the proposal was amended following the tragedy caused by the tsunami, the process of consultation and reform of the system has been over-hasty and particularly unfortunate in the light of the new Constitution.
Your rapporteur wishes to stress that, leaving aside the understandable urgency with which the proposal was amended following the tragedy caused by the tsunami, the process of consultation and reform of the system has been over-hasty and particularly unfortunate in the light of the new Constitution.
Once ratified, this Constitution will give Parliament the role of co-legislator in matters relating to trade and the GSP implementing regulations will be adopted by the co-decision procedure (normal legislative procedure).
Once ratified, this Constitution will give Parliament the role of co-legislator in matters relating to trade and the GSP implementing regulations will be adopted by the co-decision procedure (normal legislative procedure).
The rapporteur’s amendments are intended to improve the Commission proposal in line with four basic objectives: (1) to produce a more effective system more responsive to the interests of beneficiary countries and economic operators; (2) to develop rules that will provide for a better regulated reform process in which the involvement of the beneficiaries is guaranteed; (3) to ensure that the regulation gives due weight to the task of democratic control which Parliament is required to perform; and (4) to bring the European Union’s GSP scheme into line with the multilateral framework provided by the WTO and the Doha process.
The rapporteur’s amendments are intended to improve the Commission proposal in line with four basic objectives: (1) to produce a more effective system more responsive to the interests of beneficiary countries and economic operators; (2) to develop rules that will provide for a better regulated reform process in which the involvement of the beneficiaries is guaranteed; (3) to ensure that the regulation gives due weight to the task of democratic control which Parliament is required to perform; and (4) to bring the European Union’s GSP scheme into line with the multilateral framework provided by the WTO and the Doha process.
Many of the amendments tabled, whose main thrust is summarised below, are geared to the aim of making the GSP a clearer and more transparent system.
Many of the amendments tabled, whose main thrust is summarised below, are geared to the aim of making the GSP a clearer and more transparent system.
After considering the initial proposal for a regulation (COM(2004) 699), your rapporteur took the view that the implementation timetable proposed by the Commission, with entry into force scheduled for 1 July 2005, was inadequate.
After considering the initial proposal for a regulation (COM(2004) 699), your rapporteur took the view that the implementation timetable proposed by the Commission, with entry into force scheduled for 1 July 2005, was inadequate.
The Commission itself had stressed on countless occasions that the GSP implementing regulations should be published sufficiently in advance (at least eight months) to enable economic operators and beneficiary countries to adjust to the changes introduced, particularly as regards the new special arrangement.
The Commission itself had stressed on countless occasions that the GSP implementing regulations should be published sufficiently in advance (at least eight months) to enable economic operators and beneficiary countries to adjust to the changes introduced, particularly as regards the new special arrangement.
Your rapporteur therefore regrets that, contrary to what was said in the July communication on GSP guidelines and contrary to what Commissioner Lamy himself announced in Parliament at the debate of 14 October, the initial Commission proposal set the date for the full entry into force of the new regulation at 1 July 2005, instead of 1 January 2006 as initially scheduled, making it impossible to ensure an orderly transition to the application of the new special arrangements.
Your rapporteur therefore regrets that, contrary to what was said in the July communication on GSP guidelines and contrary to what Commissioner Lamy himself announced in Parliament at the debate of 14 October, the initial Commission proposal set the date for the full entry into force of the new regulation at 1 July 2005, instead of 1 January 2006 as initially scheduled, making it impossible to ensure an orderly transition to the application of the new special arrangements.
The main innovation made by the amended proposal presented by the Commission on 10 February 2005 is to bring forward the regulation's entry into force to 1 April 2005, thereby allowing all the beneficiary countries, and in particular those affected by the tsunami, to enjoy the advantages offered by the new GSP immediately.
The main innovation made by the amended proposal presented by the Commission on 10 February 2005 is to bring forward the regulation's entry into force to 1 April 2005, thereby allowing all the beneficiary countries, and in particular those affected by the tsunami, to enjoy the advantages offered by the new GSP immediately.
As well as speeding up the timetable, the amended proposal provides for the provisional application until 31 May 2005 of the new special scheme (GSP+) to those countries which already meet the requirements laid down by the Regulation (six countries listed in column E of Annex I).
As well as speeding up the timetable, the amended proposal provides for the provisional application until 31 May 2005 of the new special scheme (GSP+) to those countries which already meet the requirements laid down by the Regulation (six countries listed in column E of Annex I).
Your rapporteur endorses the Commission's intention to bring forward the Regulation's entry into force to 1 April 2005 so that the countries hit by the tsunami can benefit from the advantages offered by the new system as soon as possible.
Your rapporteur endorses the Commission's intention to bring forward the Regulation's entry into force to 1 April 2005 so that the countries hit by the tsunami can benefit from the advantages offered by the new system as soon as possible.
Nevertheless, your rapporteur believes that, in accordance with the principles of legal certainty, sound administration and legitimate trust, a transitional period should be provided until 31 December 2005 so that countries which benefit from the special schemes currently in force under Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 and which are not included in the list of beneficiaries of the new special incentive scheme do not suffer an unjustified erosion of preferences.
Nevertheless, your rapporteur believes that, in accordance with the principles of legal certainty, sound administration and legitimate trust, a transitional period should be provided until 31 December 2005 so that countries which benefit from the special schemes currently in force under Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 and which are not included in the list of beneficiaries of the new special incentive scheme do not suffer an unjustified erosion of preferences.
This reflects a clear desire for reform and compliance with the WTO ruling, yet without undermining the higher principles governing the legal system.
This reflects a clear desire for reform and compliance with the WTO ruling, yet without undermining the higher principles governing the legal system.
At the same time, as stated in one of the amendments tabled by your rapporteur, it must be stressed that the ratification and effective implementation of the conventions provided for by the new special scheme must be completed as rapidly as possible, in accordance with the constitutional rules and legal constraints applying in the beneficiary country concerned.
At the same time, as stated in one of the amendments tabled by your rapporteur, it must be stressed that the ratification and effective implementation of the conventions provided for by the new special scheme must be completed as rapidly as possible, in accordance with the constitutional rules and legal constraints applying in the beneficiary country concerned.
Exclusion clause (Article 3(5) and graduation mechanism (Article 13(1))
Exclusion clause (Article 3(5) and graduation mechanism (Article 13(1))