natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
1.6.a Při kvantifikaci útvarů podzemních vod zjistí členské státy – ve spolupráci s úřady odpovědnými za povodí – vodní bilanci a hladinu zvodnělé vrstvy za použití vhodných ukazatelů definovaných na základě historických údajů a monitorovacích systémů vytvořených za tímto účelem.
1.6.a When quantifying groundwater bodies the Member States - in cooperation with the bodies responsible for river basin districts - shall determine an aquifer’s water balance and level by using appropriate indicators defined on the basis of historical data and the monitoring networks developed for the purpose.
The Member States (acting through their appropriate bodies) know most about the trends in groundwater levels, thanks to control and monitoring networks.
The Member States (acting through their appropriate bodies) know most about the trends in groundwater levels, thanks to control and monitoring networks.
The fact that aquifers differ on account of the widely varying geology within the European Union should be taken into account.
The fact that aquifers differ on account of the widely varying geology within the European Union should be taken into account.
Příloha IV, bod 2.1
Annex IV, point 2.1
2.1 Změny trendu by měly být zaměřeny na trendy, které představují riziko poškození souvisejících vodních ekosystémů nebo závislých suchozemských ekosystémů, lidského zdraví nebo legitimního využívání vodního prostředí.
2.1 Trend reversals shall be focused on trends which present a risk of harm to associated aquatic ecosystems, directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems, human health or legitimate uses of the water environment.
2.1 Změny trendu by měly být zaměřeny na trendy, které představují riziko poškození podzemních vod, souvisejících vodních ekosystémů nebo závislých suchozemských ekosystémů, lidského zdraví nebo legitimního využívání vodního prostředí.
2.1 Trend reversals shall be focused on trends which present a risk of harm to groundwater, associated aquatic ecosystems, directly dependent terrestrial ecosystems, human health or legitimate uses of the water environment.
Groundwater must be mentioned.
Groundwater must be mentioned.
Příloha IV, bod 2.2
Annex IV, point 2.2
2.2 Postup identifikace počátku změny trendu by měl být založen na časových kritériích a přinejmenším na základě údajů z monitorování podle článku 8 směrnice 2000/60/ES.
2.2 The procedure for identifying the starting point for a trend reversal shall be established on a time basis, and at the minimum on the basis of monitoring data collected in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
V tomto případě odpovídají referenční hodnoty počátku monitorovacího programu.
In this case, the reference points shall correspond to the start of the monitoring programme.
The text has been taken over as 1.4. in paragraph 1.
The text has been taken over as 1.4. in paragraph 1.
Příloha IV, bod 2.3, úvod
Annex IV, point 2.3, introduction
Období nesmí být delší než 30 let.
The time series shall not exceed 30 years.
Příloha IV, bod 2.3, tabulka, sloupec 2, řádek 1
Annex IV, point 2.3, Table, Column 2, Row 1
ročně 14
Annual 14
Příloha IV, bod 2.3, tabulka, sloupec 3
Annex IV, point 2.3, Table, Column 3
ročně 30
Annual 30
pololetně 30
Half-yearly 30
čtvrtletně 30
Quarterly 30
Příloha IV, bod 2.4
Annex IV, point 2.4
2.4 Pokud je průběh trendu v prvním období pozitivní a ve druhém období negativní, jedná se o změnu trendu.
2.4 There is a trend reversal if in the first section the slope of the trend line is positive, and in the second section negative.
Pro spolehlivé posouzení změny trendu je třeba zajistit, aby počet hodnot před i po přerušení časových období odpovídal četnosti monitorování.
To allow for a reliable assessment of the trend reversal, it shall be ensured that the number of values before and after the break in the time series is adequate to the monitoring frequency .
netýká se české verze
Does not affect the English version.
Příloha IV, bod 2.6
Annex IV, point 2.6
2.6 Pokud jsou k dispozici údaje z období před začátkem monitorovacího programu, budou použity ke stanovení referenčních hodnot pro určení počátku změny trendu.
2.6 If data obtained earlier than the start of the monitoring programme exist, they should be used for establishing the reference points for the identification of the starting point for trend reversal.
The text has been transferred to paragraph 1.4 of Annex IV.
The text has been transferred to paragraph 1.4 of Annex IV.
Rules to protect against groundwater pollution have been in place since the adoption of Directive 80/68/EEC.
Rules to protect against groundwater pollution have been in place since the adoption of Directive 80/68/EEC.
This Directive should be repealed in 2013, after which the protection regime should be continued through the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the present Groundwater Daughter Directive (required under Article 17 of the WFD Directive).
This Directive should be repealed in 2013, after which the protection regime should be continued through the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the present Groundwater Daughter Directive (required under Article 17 of the WFD Directive).
Article 17 of the Directive provides for the adoption of specific criteria for the assessment of good chemical status and the identification of significant and sustained upward trends and for the definition of starting points for trend reversals.
Article 17 of the Directive provides for the adoption of specific criteria for the assessment of good chemical status and the identification of significant and sustained upward trends and for the definition of starting points for trend reversals.
Beyond the principles set up in art.
Beyond the principles set up in art.
17, the WFD also determines fundamental requirements for groundwater protection: specific environmental aims (art.
17, the WFD also determines fundamental requirements for groundwater protection: specific environmental aims (art.
4), monitoring of the state of groundwater (art.
4), monitoring of the state of groundwater (art.
8), prohibition of direct discharge in the context of the planned programme of measures (art.
8), prohibition of direct discharge in the context of the planned programme of measures (art.
11), special regulations for "water bodies for the withdrawal of drinking water" (art.
11), special regulations for "water bodies for the withdrawal of drinking water" (art.
Annex II, par.
Annex II, par.
2 characterises the groundwater and Annex V, par.
2 characterises the groundwater and Annex V, par.
2 provides criteria regarding the monitoring of the quantitative and chemical status of groundwater.
2 provides criteria regarding the monitoring of the quantitative and chemical status of groundwater.
Preserving the level of protection
Preserving the level of protection
The complementarity between the two pieces of legislation and the fact that Directive 80/68/EEC will be repealed in 2013, impose to clearly monitor the level of protection that will be ensure to groundwater in the future.
The complementarity between the two pieces of legislation and the fact that Directive 80/68/EEC will be repealed in 2013, impose to clearly monitor the level of protection that will be ensure to groundwater in the future.
Your rapporteur takes the view that the WFD, complemented by the new groundwater Directive, must provide the same level of protection as the one set down by Directive 80/68/EEC.
Your rapporteur takes the view that the WFD, complemented by the new groundwater Directive, must provide the same level of protection as the one set down by Directive 80/68/EEC.
She therefore tables several amendments in order to reintegrate in the new text elements of the existing groundwater Directive, and to ensure the cautionary approach that is so important for groundwater, in order to prevent or control the deterioration of groundwater through new input.
She therefore tables several amendments in order to reintegrate in the new text elements of the existing groundwater Directive, and to ensure the cautionary approach that is so important for groundwater, in order to prevent or control the deterioration of groundwater through new input.
Precautionary principle
Precautionary principle
According to the precautionary principle, it is essential that the new legislation ensures that prevention remains a key element in the monitoring of groundwater in the EU.
According to the precautionary principle, it is essential that the new legislation ensures that prevention remains a key element in the monitoring of groundwater in the EU.
The prevention principle, which is clearly established in the existing Directive, must be equally clearly established in the current proposal.
The prevention principle, which is clearly established in the existing Directive, must be equally clearly established in the current proposal.
In the view of the rapporteur, and in order to safeguard the progress already accomplished, the new Directive must also integrate the dispositions of Directive 80/68/EEC (which will cease to apply as of 2013 at the latest) on prevention, avoidance or control of the input of dangerous substances.
In the view of the rapporteur, and in order to safeguard the progress already accomplished, the new Directive must also integrate the dispositions of Directive 80/68/EEC (which will cease to apply as of 2013 at the latest) on prevention, avoidance or control of the input of dangerous substances.
As pollution or deterioration frequently gives rise to irreversible damage, amendments are tabled to secure that the level of protection against new input will be at least comparable to that for surface water of very good chemical status.
As pollution or deterioration frequently gives rise to irreversible damage, amendments are tabled to secure that the level of protection against new input will be at least comparable to that for surface water of very good chemical status.
Article 6 of the proposal must provide practical expression of the strict precautionary approach set out in Article 4 paragraph 1, point ( b) (i) of Directive 80/68/EC.
Article 6 of the proposal must provide practical expression of the strict precautionary approach set out in Article 4 paragraph 1, point ( b) (i) of Directive 80/68/EC.
Prevention of indirect discharges to groundwater is of particular importance and should be a priority.
Prevention of indirect discharges to groundwater is of particular importance and should be a priority.
The same requirements must apply to anthropogenic input and discharge as for direct input.
The same requirements must apply to anthropogenic input and discharge as for direct input.
"Topping up" until a good chemical status is achieved contradicts the provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC as well as Directive 80/68/EEC, and cannot be allowed.
"Topping up" until a good chemical status is achieved contradicts the provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC as well as Directive 80/68/EEC, and cannot be allowed.
On precautionary grounds, the permitted input must be restricted so as to ensure that groundwater which is relatively unaffected by anthropogenic pollution is protected and any deterioration is prevented.
On precautionary grounds, the permitted input must be restricted so as to ensure that groundwater which is relatively unaffected by anthropogenic pollution is protected and any deterioration is prevented.
Finally, all amendments tabled intend to ensure that the prevention approach will remain a key element in the monitoring of groundwater.
Finally, all amendments tabled intend to ensure that the prevention approach will remain a key element in the monitoring of groundwater.
Quality standards
Quality standards
Your rapporteur also wants to question the argument that, as the GWD proposal is designed to complement the WFD, the Commission did not consider as appropriate to list new quality standards that would be applied uniformly to all groundwater bodies throughout Europe.
Your rapporteur also wants to question the argument that, as the GWD proposal is designed to complement the WFD, the Commission did not consider as appropriate to list new quality standards that would be applied uniformly to all groundwater bodies throughout Europe.
As a result, the proposal envisages only listing substances for which EU-wide standards for groundwater already exist.
As a result, the proposal envisages only listing substances for which EU-wide standards for groundwater already exist.
For other substances, Member States should establish quality standards based on the criteria in the proposal.
For other substances, Member States should establish quality standards based on the criteria in the proposal.
In the light of the action taken at national level, the Commission will then decide whether it is appropriate to make proposals to extend the list of substances covered by EU standards.
In the light of the action taken at national level, the Commission will then decide whether it is appropriate to make proposals to extend the list of substances covered by EU standards.
Your rapporteur considers this approach as insufficient and takes the view that the arguments that no further quality standards for good chemical status can be proposed owing to a lack of data is not valid and can not be accepted.
Your rapporteur considers this approach as insufficient and takes the view that the arguments that no further quality standards for good chemical status can be proposed owing to a lack of data is not valid and can not be accepted.
She thinks that uniform quality standards need to be established and should apply to all Member States .
She thinks that uniform quality standards need to be established and should apply to all Member States .
Europe-wide uniform standards must be laid down for the good chemical status to be achieved by 2015 in order to prevent eco-dumping and unequal terms of competition.
Europe-wide uniform standards must be laid down for the good chemical status to be achieved by 2015 in order to prevent eco-dumping and unequal terms of competition.
The current proposal should, therefore, contain a mandatory revision clause, as proposed by your rapporteur.
The current proposal should, therefore, contain a mandatory revision clause, as proposed by your rapporteur.
It is the responsibility of the European Parliament and the Council to adopt a list of priority substances not naturally occurring in groundwater and presenting a significant risk to groundwater, the discharge or input of which must therefore be prevented pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1 of this Directive.
It is the responsibility of the European Parliament and the Council to adopt a list of priority substances not naturally occurring in groundwater and presenting a significant risk to groundwater, the discharge or input of which must therefore be prevented pursuant to Article 6, paragraph 1 of this Directive.
This list should replace lists I and II of Directive 80/68/EEC before it repeal.
This list should replace lists I and II of Directive 80/68/EEC before it repeal.
For that reason, the minimum parameters have been taken over from Annex III.
For that reason, the minimum parameters have been taken over from Annex III.
The concentration values should be based on human and eco-toxicological considerations and define the risk of pollution, i.e. the transition to poor status.
The concentration values should be based on human and eco-toxicological considerations and define the risk of pollution, i.e. the transition to poor status.
This procedure is needed to offset the withdrawal of Directive 80/68/EEC in 2013 and to create a basis for the same risk-based approach for groundwater as for surface water as set out in Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
This procedure is needed to offset the withdrawal of Directive 80/68/EEC in 2013 and to create a basis for the same risk-based approach for groundwater as for surface water as set out in Article 16 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
The principles of river basin management also call for an integrated approach.
The principles of river basin management also call for an integrated approach.
It is also necessary to set up an overall limit value if we want to encounter the standards determined by the WFD.
It is also necessary to set up an overall limit value if we want to encounter the standards determined by the WFD.
That's the reason why total pesticides and their active ingredients are also included as parameters since often pollution cannot be traced back to one pesticide.
That's the reason why total pesticides and their active ingredients are also included as parameters since often pollution cannot be traced back to one pesticide.
Article 6 of the proposal is amended to avoid the risk of allowing indirect discharges to be poured in, preventing to change the status of the groundwater to good.
Article 6 of the proposal is amended to avoid the risk of allowing indirect discharges to be poured in, preventing to change the status of the groundwater to good.
Classification of groundwater
Classification of groundwater
Classification of groundwater is a key feature and there must therefore be clear provisions as to how it needs to be done.
Classification of groundwater is a key feature and there must therefore be clear provisions as to how it needs to be done.
The proposal must lay down the essential features of the definitive procedure for the classification of bodies of groundwater as of good or poor chemical status, on the basis of measurements.
The proposal must lay down the essential features of the definitive procedure for the classification of bodies of groundwater as of good or poor chemical status, on the basis of measurements.
The texts should therefore clarify that, in the event of the standard being exceeded at a measuring point, tests should be carried out to ascertain whether the findings obtained also apply to the entire body of groundwater.
The texts should therefore clarify that, in the event of the standard being exceeded at a measuring point, tests should be carried out to ascertain whether the findings obtained also apply to the entire body of groundwater.
The provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, as they could be construed as meaning that one poor measurement point is sufficient to have to classify the whole body of groundwater as poor, seems not to be appropriate; particularly if that measurement point is not representative of the whole or a substantial part of the body of groundwater.
The provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, as they could be construed as meaning that one poor measurement point is sufficient to have to classify the whole body of groundwater as poor, seems not to be appropriate; particularly if that measurement point is not representative of the whole or a substantial part of the body of groundwater.
Amendments to the Commission proposal seeks to lay down the essential features of the definitive procedure for the classification of bodies of groundwater as having good or poor chemical status.
Amendments to the Commission proposal seeks to lay down the essential features of the definitive procedure for the classification of bodies of groundwater as having good or poor chemical status.
Historical contaminated sites
Historical contaminated sites
Historical contaminated sites, or old groundwater pollution, which hitherto were not covered by EU law and now also number among the point sources, can hardly be rehabilitated in the time scheduled by the WFD.
Historical contaminated sites, or old groundwater pollution, which hitherto were not covered by EU law and now also number among the point sources, can hardly be rehabilitated in the time scheduled by the WFD.
Experience shows that this type of rehabilitation is hardly possible in groundwater.
Experience shows that this type of rehabilitation is hardly possible in groundwater.
Expenditure on this must take account of the principle of proportionality and protection against risk.
Expenditure on this must take account of the principle of proportionality and protection against risk.
Detailed EU provisions in respect of historical contaminated sites would be contrary to the subsidiarity principle.
Detailed EU provisions in respect of historical contaminated sites would be contrary to the subsidiarity principle.
The requirements needed are too complex and depend on the particular circumstances of the individual case.
The requirements needed are too complex and depend on the particular circumstances of the individual case.
The methods to be used for rehabilitating historical contaminated sites should be governed by national provisions that should be made public.
The methods to be used for rehabilitating historical contaminated sites should be governed by national provisions that should be made public.
The aim of the Groundwater Daughter Directive, in conjunction with the provisions of the Water Framework Directive adopted in 2000, is to achieve good groundwater chemical status by 2015 and to keep clean groundwater clean.
The aim of the Groundwater Daughter Directive is, in conjunction with the provisions of the Water Framework Directive adopted in 2000, to achieve good groundwater chemical status by 2015 and to keep clean groundwater clean.
In the draftswoman's opinion, this goal can only be achieved by laying down uniform standards throughout Europe for the most important pollutants and indicators, as listed in Annex III in the Commission proposal.
In the draftswoman's opinion, this goal can only be achieved by laying down uniform standards throughout Europe for the most important pollutants and indicators, as listed in Annex III in the Commission proposal.
The approach adopted by the Commission of proposing European limit values for nitrates and plant protection products backs up this assessment.
The approach adopted by the Commission of proposing European limit values for nitrates and plant protection products backs up this assessment.
It is therefore incomprehensible that this approach is not also to apply to all other important known pollutants.
It is therefore incomprehensible that this approach is not also to apply to all other important known pollutants.
If it is left to the Member States to lay down groundwater quality standards for the remaining pollutants and indicators, as has been decided by a majority on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the experience of the past two decades suggests that these values and measures will be so different that environmental dumping and distortion of competition are inevitable and the goal of clean groundwater in all 25 Member States will become a distant one.
If it is left to the Member States to lay down groundwater quality standards for the remaining pollutants and indicators, as has been decided by a majority on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the experience of the past two decades suggests that these values and measures will be so different that environmental dumping and distortion of competition are inevitable and the goal of clean groundwater in all 25 Member States will become a distant one.
As this legislation sets the course for the coming decades, it is imperative, in the draftswoman's opinion, that there should be uniform groundwater quality standards throughout Europe with regard to the definition and monitoring of good groundwater chemical status.
As this legislation sets the course for the coming decades, it is imperative, in the draftswoman's opinion, that there should be uniform groundwater quality standards throughout Europe with regard to the definition and monitoring of good groundwater chemical status.
k návrhu směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o ochraně podzemních vod před znečištěním
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of groundwater against pollution
In the Water Framework Directive
In the Water Framework Directive
OJ L 327,22.12.2000, page 1 , which was adopted in 2000, some aspects of groundwater quality assessment were left out.
OJ L 327,22.12.2000, page 1 , which was adopted in 2000, some aspects of groundwater quality assessment were left out.
This "daughter directive" aims at filling these gaps.
This "daughter directive" aims at filling these gaps.