natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
While agreeing with the statement “that there cannot be sustainable development without peace and security”, the same can be said about democracy and respect for human rights.
While agreeing with the statement “that there cannot be sustainable development without peace and security”, the same can be said about democracy and respect for human rights.
The section describing the links between poverty and security, migration, trade, etc. would benefit from adding democracy and human rights as indispensable elements.
The section describing the links between poverty and security, migration, trade, etc. would benefit from adding democracy and human rights as indispensable elements.
True to its own principles, the Union should emphasise a rights-based approach to development as the basic entry-point for its development policies.
True to its own principles, the Union should emphasise a rights-based approach to development as the basic entry-point for its development policies.
Gender equality and children's rights should be given special attention.
Gender equality and children's rights should be given special attention.
Policy coherence
Policy coherence
The lack of policy coherence is a major shortcoming of development cooperation policies within the EU.
The lack of policy coherence is a major shortcoming of development cooperation policies within the EU.
The Joint Declaration must address EU policies that are seriously undermining development, such as trade, CAP and fisheries.
The Joint Declaration must address EU policies that are seriously undermining development, such as trade, CAP and fisheries.
As is stated explicitly in Article 178 of the Treaty, development cooperation should not be subordinated to other policy areas.
As is stated explicitly in Article 178 of the Treaty, development cooperation should not be subordinated to other policy areas.
On security, for instance, policies designed to fight terrorism and those fighting poverty should not be intermingled.
On security, for instance, policies designed to fight terrorism and those fighting poverty should not be intermingled.
The statement needs to acknowledge that there is no automatic relationship between economic growth and market opening on the one hand, and poverty reduction on the other.
The statement needs to acknowledge that there is no automatic relationship between economic growth and market opening on the one hand, and poverty reduction on the other.
Moreover, several studies convincingly show that the elimination of trade barriers for exports from the world's poorer nations would give far greater benefits than increased aid.
Moreover, several studies convincingly show that the elimination of trade barriers for exports from the world's poorer nations would give far greater benefits than increased aid.
Certainly, there are supply side problems in many developing countries.
Certainly, there are supply side problems in many developing countries.
This problem, however, needs to be addressed through well-targeted aid programmes and should not be used as an excuse to maintain a policy of high tariffs and export subsidies.
This problem, however, needs to be addressed through well-targeted aid programmes and should not be used as an excuse to maintain a policy of high tariffs and export subsidies.
Priorities and responsibilities
Priorities and responsibilities
The paper is far too vague on thematic focus and priorities.
The paper is far too vague on thematic focus and priorities.
In part 1, there is confusion between values, principles, objectives and action themes.
In part 1, there is confusion between values, principles, objectives and action themes.
Part 2 makes no real attempt to define the comparative advantage of aid managed by the Commission.
Part 2 makes no real attempt to define the comparative advantage of aid managed by the Commission.
The impression given is that the Commission wants for itself maximum flexibility on determining the areas in which it chooses to be involved.
The impression given is that the Commission wants for itself maximum flexibility on determining the areas in which it chooses to be involved.
For the sake of greater coordination and complementarity – and hence effectiveness – within the Union, but also as a form of transparency and democratic accountability towards the European public, priorities should be set.
For the sake of greater coordination and complementarity – and hence effectiveness – within the Union, but also as a form of transparency and democratic accountability towards the European public, priorities should be set.
The Commission should not be viewed, nor should it view itself, as the 26 th donor.
The Commission should not be viewed, nor should it view itself, as the 26 th donor.
Rather, the value-added of Community aid should be well defined, giving particular attention to its potential for enhancing coordination (keeping in mind the principle of partner country ownership), its size, its image of neutrality, its experience and expertise in regional cooperation, governance, democracy and human rights, its role as a global player, its potential role as a policy think tank, etc.
Rather, the value-added of Community aid should be well defined, giving particular attention to its potential for enhancing coordination (keeping in mind the principle of partner country ownership), its size, its image of neutrality, its experience and expertise in regional cooperation, governance, democracy and human rights, its role as a global player, its potential role as a policy think tank, etc.
Successful development is organic and has to be systems-based.
Successful development is organic and has to be systems-based.
Here, the Commission could play an important role, not least in relation to the MDGs.
Here, the Commission could play an important role, not least in relation to the MDGs.
While the UN system is organized along sector lines, the Commission has a potential – at least in theory – to pursue the poverty reduction agenda in a more horizontal way.
While the UN system is organized along sector lines, the Commission has a potential – at least in theory – to pursue the poverty reduction agenda in a more horizontal way.
It seems fitting that the Union as a whole should be engaged in all major areas of development.
It seems fitting that the Union as a whole should be engaged in all major areas of development.
However, there are certain issues which merit special attention and which should be developed as priority areas – such as HIV prevention, climate change mitigation, trade reform, conflict prevention and good governance - for the good reason that if they are not effectively tackled, other development efforts may be in vain.
However, there are certain issues which merit special attention and which should be developed as priority areas – such as HIV prevention, climate change mitigation, trade reform, conflict prevention and good governance - for the good reason that if they are not effectively tackled, other development efforts may be in vain.
The Joint Declaration should heed recognition to such issues and develop a proactive policy to address them.
The Joint Declaration should heed recognition to such issues and develop a proactive policy to address them.
The proposal briefly discusses a number of the most important development issues at stake today.
The proposal briefly discusses a number of the most important development issues at stake today.
However, some important aspects of development and poverty eradication are either missing or dealt with in a summary fashion.
However, some important aspects of development and poverty eradication are either missing or dealt with in a summary fashion.
Many low-income countries are off track in pursuing the health related MDGs.
Many low-income countries are off track in pursuing the health related MDGs.
A major issue is the desperate shortage of medical personnel, notably in sub-Saharan Africa.
A major issue is the desperate shortage of medical personnel, notably in sub-Saharan Africa.
This problem calls for a more systems-based approach to health and development, giving highest priority to the strengthening of health systems.
This problem calls for a more systems-based approach to health and development, giving highest priority to the strengthening of health systems.
The proposal contains several references to good governance.
The proposal contains several references to good governance.
However, more attention should be paid to the important role of national and regional parliaments.
However, more attention should be paid to the important role of national and regional parliaments.
Parliaments are often marginalized and their role overlooked when strategies for development and poverty reduction are devised.
Parliaments are often marginalized and their role overlooked when strategies for development and poverty reduction are devised.
Parliaments should be supported, in order to enable them to carry out their important oversight role.
Parliaments should be supported, in order to enable them to carry out their important oversight role.
The paper more or less ignores the devastating impact on the livelihoods of the rural poor of rapidly degrading forests, depletion of soils and marine resources, and fresh water scarcity.
The paper more or less ignores the devastating impact on the livelihoods of the rural poor of rapidly degrading forests, depletion of soils and marine resources, and fresh water scarcity.
The rural poor are totally dependent on a traditional biomass-based economy, and a secure way to lift them out of poverty would be through massive programmes of reforestation, soil conservation, marine protection and water management.
The rural poor are totally dependent on a traditional biomass-based economy, and a secure way to lift them out of poverty would be through massive programmes of reforestation, soil conservation, marine protection and water management.
Such programmes ought to be a priority for the Union as a whole.
Such programmes ought to be a priority for the Union as a whole.
Moreover, the Community and the Member States should promote the use of Country Environmental Profiles and Sustainability Impact Assessments in all their development activities.
Moreover, the Community and the Member States should promote the use of Country Environmental Profiles and Sustainability Impact Assessments in all their development activities.
Another important aspect – also related to the environment – is the fact that developing countries need not repeat the polluting mistakes of industrialised countries in modernising their economies.
Another important aspect – also related to the environment – is the fact that developing countries need not repeat the polluting mistakes of industrialised countries in modernising their economies.
Investments in clean technology, notably in areas such as energy and transport, should be supported in order to help the development of more environment-friendly production and consumption systems.
Investments in clean technology, notably in areas such as energy and transport, should be supported in order to help the development of more environment-friendly production and consumption systems.
This would benefit the developing countries as well as the rest of the world.
This would benefit the developing countries as well as the rest of the world.
Hundreds of millions of poor people live in high-risk areas for natural disasters.
Hundreds of millions of poor people live in high-risk areas for natural disasters.
Global warming accelerates their frequency and aggravates their consequences; so, many countries find themselves in a vicious cycle of loss and recovery without the ability to move forward.
Global warming accelerates their frequency and aggravates their consequences; so, many countries find themselves in a vicious cycle of loss and recovery without the ability to move forward.
The only solution to this problem is to manage disaster risks as an integral part of development planning, rather than merely a humanitarian issue.
The only solution to this problem is to manage disaster risks as an integral part of development planning, rather than merely a humanitarian issue.
If the Union is serious about the MDGs, disaster prevention and preparedness should become a major priority.
If the Union is serious about the MDGs, disaster prevention and preparedness should become a major priority.
Návrh společného prohlášení Rady, Evropského parlamentu a Komise o rozvojové politice Evropské unie „Evropský konsensus“
Proposal for a Joint Declaration by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on the European Union Development Policy "The European Consensus"
Anders Wijkman 2.12.2004
Anders Wijkman 2.12.2004
Margrete Auken, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Thierry Cornillet, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Fernando Fernández Martín, Michael Gahler, Hélène Goudin, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Józef Pinior, Toomas Savi, Pierre Schapira, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Anna Záborská, Mauro Zani
Margrete Auken, Margrietus van den Berg, Danutė Budreikaitė, Marie-Arlette Carlotti, Thierry Cornillet, Nirj Deva, Koenraad Dillen, Fernando Fernández Martín, Michael Gahler, Hélène Goudin, Filip Andrzej Kaczmarek, Maria Martens, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Gay Mitchell, Józef Pinior, Toomas Savi, Pierre Schapira, Jürgen Schröder, Feleknas Uca, Anna Záborská, Mauro Zani
PE 364.762v02-00
PE 364.762v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh Komise ( KOM(2005)0401 – C6-0277/2005 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0401 - C6-0277/2005 ),
– s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
Dohoda ve znění pozměněném rozhodnutím 2003/429/ES Evropského parlamentu a Rady (Úř. věst.
Agreement amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p.
– s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, kterou se doplňuje interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
C 283, 20.11.2002, s. 1. , a podmínky, kterými se řídí její použití,
1. and to the conditions governing the resort to it,
– s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2012/2002 ze dne 11. listopadu 2002, kterým se zakládá Fond solidarity Evropské unie
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– s ohledem na legislativní usnesení ze dne 10. října 2002 o návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se zakládá Fond solidarity Evropské unie
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 10 October 2002 on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru (A6-0000/2005),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A6‑0000/2005),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že Evropská unie určila příslušné institucionální a rozpočtové nástroje ke krytí škod způsobených velkými přírodními katastrofami,
A. Whereas the European Union has set up the appropriate institutional and budgetary instruments to cover the damage resulting from major natural disasters,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že Švédsko, Estonsko, Lotyšsko a Litva předložily žádost o krytí škod způsobených vichřicí dne 8. ledna 2005,
B. Whereas Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have introduced their requests to cover the damage resulting from the storm of 8 January 2005,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že finanční pomoc Evropské unie členským zemím, které byly postiženy přírodní katastrofou, by měla dorazit co nejrychleji a měla by být co nejúčinnější,
C. Whereas the European Union's financial assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters should come as quickly and efficiently as possible,
o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity podle bodu 3 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, kterou se doplňuje interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, která doplňuje interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
C 283, 20.11.2002, s. 1. , zejména s ohledem na bod 3 této dohody,
1. , and in particular point 3 thereof,
(1) Evropská unie zřídila Fond solidarity Evropské unie (dále jen „fond“), aby ukázala svou solidaritu s obyvatelstvem regionů postižených katastrofou.
(1) The European Union has created a Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Švédsko, Estonsko, Lotyšsko a Litva předložily svou žádost o uvolnění prostředků z fondu do deseti týdnů, jak stanoví článek 4 nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2012/2002 ze dne 11. listopadu 2002, z důvodu katastrofy způsobené vichřicí.
(2) Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania submitted their applications to mobilise the Fund within the ten week deadline set by Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002, following a disaster caused by a storm.
(3) Interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 umožňuje uvolnění prostředků z fondu v rámci ročního stropu ve výši 1 miliardy eur.
(3) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 allows mobilisation of the Fund within an annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(4) Vichřice ve Švédsku, Estonsku, Lotyšsku a Litvě ze dne 8. ledna 2005 splňuje kritéria pro uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie,
(4) The storm disaster in Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania on 8 January 2005 fulfils the criteria for mobilising the European Union Solidarity Fund,
ROZHODLY TAKTO:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
V rámci souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na finanční rok 2005 se z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie uvolní prostředky ve výši 92 880 830 eur do položek závazků.
The European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 92 880 830 in commitment appropriations from the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005.
Toto rozhodnutí se vyhlašuje v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity podle bodu 3 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, kterou se doplňuje interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
BUDG 27.9.2005
BUDG 27.9.2005
Hans-Peter Martin, Peter Šťastný
Hans-Peter Martin, Peter Šťastný
PE 364.763v02-00
PE 364.763v02-00
o návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 7/2005 Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005, oddíl III – Komise
on Draft amending budget No 7/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005 - Section III – Commission
– s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii (Euratom), zejména na článek 177 této smlouvy,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,
– s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 1605/2002 ze dne 27. června 2002 o finančním nařízení vztahujícím se na souhrnný rozpočet Evropských společenství
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 27 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
- s ohledem na rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady ze dne .... o poskytnutí částky 92 880 830 eur z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie na zajištění finanční pomoci Švédsku, Estonsku, Lotyšsku a Litvě na nápravu vážných škod způsobených vichřicí dne 8. ledna 2005,
- having regard to the decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of .... to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund for the amount of EUR 92 880 830 to grant financial assistance to Sweden, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania for severe damages caused by a major storm on 8 January 2005,
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 6/2005 Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005, který předložila Komise dne 8. září 2005 ( SEK(2005)1083 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 6/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, which the Commission presented on 8 September 2005 ( SEC(2005)1083 ),
– s ohledem na návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 7/2005 sestavený Radou dne 7. listopadu 2005 (13489/2005 – C6-0358/2005 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 7/2005, which the Council established on 7 November 2005 (13489/2005 – C6‑0358/2005 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0321/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0321/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že by Evropská unie měla vyjádřit svou solidaritu s obyvateli v oblastech členských států postižených přírodními katastrofami, které mají závažný vliv na životní podmínky, životní prostředí nebo hospodářství,
A. whereas the European Union should show its solidarity with the population of regions of Member States concerned by natural disasters, which have serious repercussions on living conditions, the natural environment or the economy,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že byly v souladu s ustanoveními Fondu solidarity Evropské unie a interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 200 5 týkajícími se jeho financování vyčleněny patřičné rozpočtové prostředky na finanční pomoc Evropské unie,
B. whereas the appropriate budgetary resources for the European Union's financial assistance have been mobilised in accordance with the provisions of the European Union Solidarity Fund and of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2005 relating to its financing,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že cílem návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 7/2005 je formálně zanést tyto rozpočtové prostředky do rozpočtu na rok 2005,
C. whereas the purpose of Draft Amending Budget No 7/2005 is to formally enter these budgetary resources in the 2005 budget,
On 8 January 2005 a major storm hit large parts of northern Europe causing severe damage in a number of countries.
On 8 January 2005 a major storm hit large parts of northern Europe causing severe damage in a number of countries.