natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Syistä, jotka on lueteltu edellä ja esitelty tarkemmin parlamentin ensimmäisen käsittelyn päätöksessä, tämä ei riitä ihmisten terveyden ja ympäristön suojelemiseksi ja EU:n hyväksymien ilmanlaatutavoitteiden toteuttamiseksi.
For the reasons listed above and set out in more detail in the decision taken by Parliament at first reading, the latter is not enough to protect human health and the environment or achieve the EU’s approved air quality targets.
Neuvoston kanta puhdistaisi päästöjä vain rikkipäästöjen valvonta-alueilla eli Pohjanmerellä, Englannin kanaalissa ja Itämerellä.
The Council position would clean up emissions only in the SO x emission control areas, in other words the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Baltic Sea.
Vähärikkisemmästä raakaöljystä tuotettua raskasta polttoöljyä käytettäisiin näillä alueilla.
Heavy fuel oil made from crude containing less sulphur would be used in those areas.
Sen sijaan muilla EU:n merialueilla, Välimerellä ja lounaisella Atlantilla, käytettävän polttoaineen rikkipitoisuus todennäköisesti kohoaisi entisestään.
However, the sulphur content of fuel used in other EU sea areas, the Mediterranean and the North-East Atlantic, would probably be higher than before.
Rikin ja typen oksidien vaikutukset kulttuurimonumentteihin sekä laivaliikenteen kaikkien päästöjen haitalliset terveysvaikutukset koskevat kuitenkin myös Välimeren aluetta ja koko eteläisempää Eurooppaa.
In any event, the impact of sulphur and nitrogen oxides on cultural monuments and the harmful health effects of all shipping emissions likewise extend to the Mediterranean area and the more southern parts of Europe as a whole.
Komissio laskee skenaarioita tulevista ilmanlaatuvaatimuksista CAFE-ohjelman (Clean Air For Europe) puitteissa.
The Commission is working out scenarios for future air quality requirements under the CAFE (Clean Air For Europe) programme.
Esittelijä on pyytänyt komissiota laskemaan ne ilmanlaatuvaikutukset, jotka saavutettaisiin toteuttamalla tämän ehdotuksen mukaiset laivapolttoaineen puhtausvaatimukset.
The rapporteur has asked it to gauge the impact on air quality that could be brought about by enforcing marine fuel purity requirements in accordance with the proposal.
Komissio on arvioinut ehdotuksestaan saatavat hyödyt yli kaksinkertaisiksi kustannuksiin verrattuna.
In its proposal the Commission has estimated that the benefits would be more than double the costs.
Mutta voidaan arvioida, että hyödyt ylittävät kustannukset myös silloin, kun toteutetaan laivapolttoaineen 0,5 prosentin rikkipitoisuusraja rikkipäästöjen valvonta-alueilla eli Itämerellä, Pohjanmerellä ja Englannin kanaalissa, ja niiden lisäksi muillakin EU:n merialueilla, lounaisella Atlantilla ja Välimerellä.
But there is also reason to suppose that the benefits could likewise exceed the costs if a 0.5% marine fuel sulphur limit were imposed in SO x emission control areas, that is to say, the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, and the English Channel, and in other EU sea areas as well, namely the North-East Atlantic and the Mediterranean.
Kansainvälisen sovelletun systeemianalyysin laitoksen (IIASA) kehittämää RAINS-mallia on käytetty muun muassa NEC-direktiivin ja CAFE-ohjelman valmistelussa.
The RAINS model, developed by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), has been used, among other things, to draw up the NEC directive and the CAFE programme.
Tällä mallilla arvioituina hyödyt voivat olla jopa 7–8-kertaiset kustannuksiin verrattuna.
The benefits calculated using that model could be as much as seven or eight times greater than the costs.
Beicip-Franlab-malli arvioi kustannukset korkeammiksi kuin RAINS-malli.
The Beicip-Franlab model puts a higher figure on the costs than the RAINS model.
Mutta senkin mukaan arvioidut hyödyt ovat useimmissa näistä tapauksista noin kaksinkertaiset kustannuksiin verrattuna.
But even in that case the estimated benefits amount for the most part to more than double the costs.
Esittelijä korostaa, että on tärkeää edetä IMO:ssa, mutta jotta tämä voisi olla mahdollista, EU:n tulee näyttää tietä eteenpäin.
The rapporteur maintains that it is important to make progress in the IMO, but to enable that to happen, the EU should point the way forward.
EU on jo yksipuolisilla päätöksillä kieltänyt yksirunkoiset tankkerit ja orgaanisia tinayhdisteitä sisältävät laivanpohjamaalit.
Under unilateral decisions the EU has banned single-hulled tankers and ship bottom models containing organic tin compounds.
Myös USA pyrkii IMO:n sopimusten tiukentamiseen.
The United States is also seeking to tighten up IMO agreements.
USA on säätänyt 15 ppm:n (0,015 %) rikkipitoisuusrajan aluevesillään kaikille muille aluksille paitsi valtamerillä liikennöiville.
It has laid down a 15 ppm (0.0015 %) sulphur limit in its territorial waters for all ships bar ocean-going vessels.
Lisäksi USA valmistelee yhdessä Kanadan ja Meksikon kanssa IMO:lle tehtävää ehdotusta, joka tiukentaisi rikkipäästöjen valvonta-alueilla (SECA) sovellettavaa alusten polttoaineen rikkipitoisuusrajaa 1,5 prosentista 0,1 prosenttiin.
In addition, together with Canada and Mexico, it is drawing up a proposal to the IMO to tighten up the fuel sulphur limit to apply in SO x emission control areas (SECAs) by lowering it from 1.5% to 0.1%.
Ottamalla tähän uudistukseen mukaan toisen vaiheen, jossa mentäisiin Marpol-sopimuksen liitettä VI pidemmälle, EU loisi omalta osaltaan painetta kehittää IMO:n sopimuksia nykyistä paremmiksi.
By incorporating a second stage into the reform, going further than Annex VI to the MARPOL Convention, the EU would create its own pressure to improve the IMO agreements.
On tärkeää edistää uuden ja aiempaa paremman ympäristöteknologian kehittämistä luomalla niille markkinat.
It is important to promote the development of new and better environmental technology by creating a market for it.
Siksi esittelijä ehdottaa useita vaihtoehtoisia tapoja toteuttaa uudet puhtausvaatimukset.
The rapporteur is therefore proposing several possible ways of implementing the new purity requirements.
Puhtaamman polttoaineen käyttöä vastaava päästövähennys voidaan saavuttaa myös puhdistamalla laivan savukaasut, edellyttäen että savukaasujen puhdistusjäte käsitellään ympäristön kannalta asianmukaisella tavalla.
The emission reduction corresponding to the use of cleaner fuel could also be achieved by purifying ship combustion gases, on the understanding that the purification waste would have to be treated in an environmentally appropriate way.
Puhdistamalla savukaasut laivalla niistä voidaan poistaa rikin oksidien lisäksi muitakin haitallisia aineita, typen oksideita ja hiukkasia.
By purifying the combustion gases on board, it would be possible to remove not only sulphur oxides, but also other noxious substances, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter.
Esittelijä ehdottaa myös, että komissiolle annettaisiin valtuudet valmistella laivapäästöjen päästökauppa.
The rapporteur also proposes that the Commission be given the powers to organise trading in shipping emissions.
Näin luotaisiin insentiivi sellaisen tekniikan kehittämiselle, jolla voidaan saavuttaa vielä alhaisemmat päästötasot.
This would provide an incentive to develop technology that would enable emissions to be reduced to even lower levels.
Esittelijä ehdottaa, että EU:n satamien laiturissa alusten ei tarvitse noudattaa polttoaineen 0,1 prosentin rikkipitoisuusrajaa, jos ne laiturissa kytketään kiinteään sähköverkkoon.
The rapporteur believes that vessels at berth in EU ports should be dispensed from complying with the 0.1% sulphur limit if they are connected to a fixed electrical power supply.
SULPHUR IN MARINE FUELS
SULPHUR IN MARINE FUELS
EP FIRST READING
EP FIRST READING
6 months after entry into force (1.1.2006?)
6 months after entry into force (1.1.2006?)
Ferries (all EU)
Ferries (all EU)
ports and inland water ways
ports and inland waterways
rest of EU seas
rest of EU seas
COMMON POSITION
COMMON POSITION
12 months after entry into force (mid 2006)
12 months after entry into force (mid 2006)
1,5 % (NE Atlantic May 2007)
1.5 % (North Sea May 2007)
0,1% (Greece derogation 2012)
0.1% (Greece derogation 2012)
RAPPORTEUR'S 2nd READING PROPOSAL
RAPPORTEUR’S 2nd READING PROPOSAL
12 months after entry into force
12 months after entry into force
NE Atlantic)
North Sea)
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 1999/32/ES, pokud jde o obsah síry v lodních palivech
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels
Článek 62
Rule 62
ENVI 16.12.2004
ENVI 16.12.2004
Satu Hassi 10.1.2005
Satu Hassi 10.1.2005
Alexander de Roo
Alexander de Roo
Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Henrik Lax, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frederika Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Edite Estrela, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Henrik Lax, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
k návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o podepsání Protokolu k Dohodě mezi Evropským společenstvím a jeho členskými státy na straně jedné a Švýcarskou konfederací na straně druhé jménem Evropského společenství a jeho členských států o volném pohybu osob týkající se účasti České republiky, Estonské republiky, Kyperské republiky, Lotyšské republiky, Litevské republiky, Maďarské republiky, Republiky Malta, Polské republiky, Slovinské republiky a Slovenské republiky jako smluvních stran na základě jejich přistoupení k Evropské unii
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation, as contracting parties, of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, pursuant to their accession to the European Union
PE 353.548v02-00
PE 353.548v02-00
– s ohledem na dohodu o spolupráci mezi Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací (12585/2004),
– having regard to the cooperation agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation (12585/2004)
3 druhým pododstavcem, s čl.
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci ( A6‑0058/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0058/2005 ),
Relations between Switzerland and the European Union (EU) are particularly close as is partly demonstrated by the large number of agreements which are in place between them.
Relations between Switzerland and the European Union (EU) are particularly close as is partly demonstrated by the large number of agreements which are in place between them.
Following Switzerland’s rejection of accession to the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement in 1992, a series of bilateral agreements (the so called Bilateral Agreements I) were negotiated in order to minimise any negative consequences of that rejection.
Following Switzerland’s rejection of accession to the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement in 1992, a series of bilateral agreements (the so called Bilateral Agreements I) were negotiated in order to minimise any negative consequences of that rejection.
They covered free movement of persons, overland transport, air transport, agriculture, research, as well as technical barriers to trade and public procurement, and entered into force on 1 June 2002.
They covered free movement of persons, overland transport, air transport, agriculture, research, as well as technical barriers to trade and public procurement, and entered into force on 1 June 2002.
A second package of agreements (Bilateral Agreements II) have been negotiated since June 2002.
A second package of agreements (Bilateral Agreements II) have been negotiated since June 2002.
This package contains nine different agreements which concern the taxation of savings; the co-operation in the fight against fraud; the association of Switzerland with the Schengen acquis; participation of Switzerland in the “Dublin” and “Eurodac” regulations; trade in processed agricultural products; Swiss participation in the European Environment Agency and European Environment Information & Observation Network (EIONET); statistical co-operation; the Swiss participation in the Media plus and Media training programs, and for the avoidance of double taxation for pensioners of Community institutions.
This package contains nine different agreements which concern the taxation of savings; the co-operation in the fight against fraud; the association of Switzerland with the Schengen acquis; participation of Switzerland in the “Dublin” and “Eurodac” regulations; trade in processed agricultural products; Swiss participation in the European Environment Agency and European Environment Information & Observation Network (EIONET); statistical co-operation; the Swiss participation in the Media plus and Media training programs, and for the avoidance of double taxation for pensioners of Community institutions.
There were nine agreements signed on 26 October 2004.
There were nine agreements signed on 26 October 2004.
The Parliament is now being consulted on the conclusions.
The Parliament is now being consulted on the conclusions.
The present protocol
The present protocol
The first package of bilateral agreements signed with Switzerland included an agreement on the free movement of persons.
The first package of bilateral agreements signed with Switzerland included an agreement on the free movement of persons.
Until 31 May 2007, it contains a quota for EU citizens who would like to obtain a long-term residence permit (valid for one year or more) in Switzerland.
Until 31 May 2007, it contains a quota for EU citizens who would like to obtain a long-term residence permit (valid for one year or more) in Switzerland.
This quota of 15.000 persons annually was fully met in the first two years.
This quota of 15.000 persons annually was fully met in the first two years.
Switzerland explains this by referring to the high number of people who lived previously in the border regions close to its territory but were working in Switzerland who have now moved to live inside its borders.
Switzerland explains this by referring to the high number of people who lived previously in the border regions close to its territory but were working in Switzerland who have now moved to live inside its borders.
At the same time, the quota of 115.000 residence permits for periods between four and twelve months has in each year only been 50 % filled.
At the same time, the quota of 115.000 residence permits for periods between four and twelve months has in each year only been 50 % filled.
This agreement, in general, functions in a satisfactory manner and without any particular problems.
This agreement, in general, functions in a satisfactory manner and without any particular problems.
The agreement on free movement is the only one which did not automatically extend to the new Member States following the enlargement of the EU in May 2004.
The agreement on free movement is the only one which did not automatically extend to the new Member States following the enlargement of the EU in May 2004.
Consequently, Switzerland and the EU have had to enter into negotiations to conclude a protocol to the agreement which extends its application to the new Member States of the European Union.
Consequently, Switzerland and the EU have had to enter into negotiations to conclude a protocol to the agreement which extends its application to the new Member States of the European Union.
The protocol gives Switzerland the right to maintain quantitative limits for workers and self-employed persons from the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic looking for residence of more than one year and residence for periods between four months and one year.
The protocol gives Switzerland the right to maintain quantitative limits for workers and self-employed persons from the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia and the Slovak Republic looking for residence of more than one year and residence for periods between four months and one year.
No restrictions apply to nationals from Malta and Cyprus.
No restrictions apply to nationals from Malta and Cyprus.
Initially, these quotas will last for three years (until 31 May 2007) but they can be prolonged for an additional two years (until 31 May 2009).
Initially, these quotas will last for three years (until 31 May 2007) but they can be prolonged for an additional two years (until 31 May 2009).
In case of "serious disturbances of its labour market or threat thereof" quotas to restrict access can be maintained until 30 April 2011.
In case of "serious disturbances of its labour market or threat thereof" quotas to restrict access can be maintained until 30 April 2011.
Over the entire period 2005 - 2011, the quotas for new residence permits will grow (from 900 to 3.000 long-term and from 9.000 to 29.000 short-term).
Over the entire period 2005 - 2011, the quotas for new residence permits will grow (from 900 to 3.000 long-term and from 9.000 to 29.000 short-term).
For the period of 2011 until 2014, the safeguard clause of the existing agreement could be applied (Article 10.4).
For the period of 2011 until 2014, the safeguard clause of the existing agreement could be applied (Article 10.4).
The protocol therefore follows the model of the formula between old and new EU Member States.
The protocol therefore follows the model of the formula between old and new EU Member States.
Following enlargement of the European Union to 25 members on 1 May 2004, there are transitional periods which will limit the free movement of workers from new Member States, as set out in the Accession Treaty.
Following enlargement of the European Union to 25 members on 1 May 2004, there are transitional periods which will limit the free movement of workers from new Member States, as set out in the Accession Treaty.
Until May 2006, each of the previous 15 Member States can decide whether to open their labour market fully to workers from the new Member States or put restrictive measures in place.
Until May 2006, each of the previous 15 Member States can decide whether to open their labour market fully to workers from the new Member States or put restrictive measures in place.
After those two years, these Member States must notify the European Commission of whether they intend to continue with their restrictive measures for a maximum of another three years or apply the 'free movement of people' law regime.
After those two years, these Member States must notify the European Commission of whether they intend to continue with their restrictive measures for a maximum of another three years or apply the 'free movement of people' law regime.
The transitional measures should, in principle, end five years after accession but these Member States have the option to ask the European commission for a two-year extension if they experience serious disturbances on their labour market.
The transitional measures should, in principle, end five years after accession but these Member States have the option to ask the European commission for a two-year extension if they experience serious disturbances on their labour market.
By using a system of quotas, however, Switzerland grants immediate access within the yearly quotas.
By using a system of quotas, however, Switzerland grants immediate access within the yearly quotas.
The protocol also contains the right for Switzerland to maintain in the transitory period controls on the priority of workers integrated into the regular labour market and wage and working conditions applicable to nationals of any other Contracting Party.
The protocol also contains the right for Switzerland to maintain in the transitory period controls on the priority of workers integrated into the regular labour market and wage and working conditions applicable to nationals of any other Contracting Party.
The same controls may be maintained for persons providing services in the following four sectors: Horticultural service activities; Construction, including related branches; Security activities; and Industrial cleaning.
The same controls may be maintained for persons providing services in the following four sectors: Horticultural service activities; Construction, including related branches; Security activities; and Industrial cleaning.
Annex I contains transitional measures on the purchase of land and secondary residence which are essentially those also contained in the acts of accession.
Annex I contains transitional measures on the purchase of land and secondary residence which are essentially those also contained in the acts of accession.
Annexes II (Coordination of Social Security Schemes) and III (Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications) foresee technical adaptations.
Annexes II (Coordination of Social Security Schemes) and III (Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications) foresee technical adaptations.
The present agreement on free movement requires, like the first bilateral proposals, the assent of Parliament.
The present agreement on free movement requires, like the first bilateral proposals, the assent of Parliament.
The discussion in Switzerland
The discussion in Switzerland
As with other pre-enlargement Member States, Switzerland has debated whether the extension of the right of free movement to the citizens from the new Member States would lead to distortions in the labour market and, in particular, wage dumping.
As with other pre-enlargement Member States, Switzerland has debated whether the extension of the right of free movement to the citizens from the new Member States would lead to distortions in the labour market and, in particular, wage dumping.
To address these concerns a law with accompanying measures was passed.
To address these concerns a law with accompanying measures was passed.
Nevertheless, it is likely that a referendum will take place on the matter in Switzerland.
Nevertheless, it is likely that a referendum will take place on the matter in Switzerland.
In such a case this would be held on 25 September 2005.
In such a case this would be held on 25 September 2005.
A referendum on Schengen / Dublin would take place on 5 June 2005.
A referendum on Schengen / Dublin would take place on 5 June 2005.