natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- Schengen Member States, including Norway, Iceland and Danemark, that are associated to the Schengen acquis and fully implementing this acquis ,
- Schengen Member States, including Norway, Iceland and Danemark, that are associated to the Schengen acquis and fully implementing this acquis ,
- other new Member States
- other new Member States
as equivalent to their national visa.
as equivalent to their national visa.
This simplified regime should apply to the following documents :
This simplified regime should apply to the following documents :
- the uniform visas issued by a Schengen State in compliance with the Common Consular instructions (transit, short-stay or travel, group visa);
- the uniform visas issued by a Schengen State in compliance with the Common Consular instructions (transit, short-stay or travel, group visa);
- the national long stay visas issued by a Schengen State according to its national legislation;
- the national long stay visas issued by a Schengen State according to its national legislation;
- the residence permits issued by a Schengen State;
- the residence permits issued by a Schengen State;
- the national short term, long term visas and residence permits issued by another new Member State.
- the national short term, long term visas and residence permits issued by another new Member State.
In order to avoid a fragmentary approach, it is deemed impossible to recognise some documents whilst not recognising others.
In order to avoid a fragmentary approach, it is deemed impossible to recognise some documents whilst not recognising others.
Thus, all the abovementioned documents will be recognised as equivalent to the national visas of those new Member States which choose to implement this Decision.
Thus, all the abovementioned documents will be recognised as equivalent to the national visas of those new Member States which choose to implement this Decision.
The recognition of a document should be limited to the purpose of transit , without affecting the possibility of new Member States to issue national visas for short term stay.
The recognition of a document should be limited to the purpose of transit , without affecting the possibility of new Member States to issue national visas for short term stay.
Such a limitation is necessary in order to avoid any risk of confusion of the current Schengen rules on the state responsible for a visa application.
Such a limitation is necessary in order to avoid any risk of confusion of the current Schengen rules on the state responsible for a visa application.
The duration of the transit period may not exceed five days - this takes into account the existing rules on transit visasof the Common Consular Instructions and the geographical situation of new Member States.
The duration of the transit period may not exceed five days - this takes into account the existing rules on transit visasof the Common Consular Instructions and the geographical situation of new Member States.
This regime should only apply for a transitional period , until such a time as the new Member States will fully implement the Schengen acquis.
This regime should only apply for a transitional period , until such a time as the new Member States will fully implement the Schengen acquis.
Once a country decides to apply the decision, there will not be any possibility to suspend it, in order not to complicate the regime.
Once a country decides to apply the decision, there will not be any possibility to suspend it, in order not to complicate the regime.
The proposed decision is addressed to the new Member States but their participation in this regime is optional , in order not to impose upon them additional obligations to those as defined by the 2003 Act of Accession.
The proposed decision is addressed to the new Member States but their participation in this regime is optional , in order not to impose upon them additional obligations to those as defined by the 2003 Act of Accession.
New Member States have the possibility either to implement the new instrument or to continue issuing national visas.
New Member States have the possibility either to implement the new instrument or to continue issuing national visas.
Should they opt for the simplified regime, new Member States will have to accept documents issued by all the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis , without any distinction between them.
Should they opt for the simplified regime, new Member States will have to accept documents issued by all the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis , without any distinction between them.
Once these documents are recognised, the new Member States also have the possibility to recognise the documents issued by the other new Member States.
Once these documents are recognised, the new Member States also have the possibility to recognise the documents issued by the other new Member States.
Consequences in relation to the various protocols annexed to the Treaty and to the associated states
Consequences in relation to the various protocols annexed to the Treaty and to the associated states
The proposed Decision is addressed exclusively to new Member States and therefore does not affect the position of the United Kingdom , Ireland and Denmark .
The proposed Decision is addressed exclusively to new Member States and therefore does not affect the position of the United Kingdom , Ireland and Denmark .
As regards Norway and Iceland , although this Decision is not addressed to them and does not constitute a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the agreement these countries signed with the Council, it is necessary to include visas and residence permits delivered by these countries in the present decision.
As regards Norway and Iceland , although this Decision is not addressed to them and does not constitute a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the agreement these countries signed with the Council, it is necessary to include visas and residence permits delivered by these countries in the present decision.
The new Member States will then have the possibility to unilaterally recognise these documents.
The new Member States will then have the possibility to unilaterally recognise these documents.
This proposal is an example of the EU's desire to have a simpler, uniform visa policy.
This proposal is an example of the EU's desire to have a simpler, uniform visa policy.
In this context, the Rapporteur encourages the Commission to look into further ways of enhancing simplification of procedures and reciprocity as part of its relations with third countries and of its general visa policy.
In this context, the Rapporteur encourages the Commission to look into further ways of enhancing simplification of procedures and reciprocity as part of its relations with third countries and of its general visa policy.
The Rapporteur welcomes the present proposal which brings a response to the very acute issues which have arisen from the situation whereby the new Member States cannot recognise visas and residence permits issued by the other Member States and have to issue national visas to some third countries citizens for transit purposes.
The Rapporteur welcomes the present proposal which brings a response to the very acute issues which have arisen from the situation whereby the new Member States cannot recognise visas and residence permits issued by the other Member States and have to issue national visas to some third countries citizens for transit purposes.
On one hand, this situation implies a huge administrative burden for the new Member States’ Consular offices in the Schengen States and in the new Member States.
On one hand, this situation implies a huge administrative burden for the new Member States’ Consular offices in the Schengen States and in the new Member States.
On the other hand, the current regime is questionable because of the unjustified bureaucratic procedures and costs they imply for third countries citizens.
On the other hand, the current regime is questionable because of the unjustified bureaucratic procedures and costs they imply for third countries citizens.
When they intend to travel by land, for each one of the new Member States they pass through, these citizens need a transit visa.
When they intend to travel by land, for each one of the new Member States they pass through, these citizens need a transit visa.
This means a lengthy, dissuasive and sometimes humiliating process: several dossiers of application, with forms to fill in, photographs, supporting documents such as medical and car insurance, hotel reservation, proofs of subsistence, bank statements, etc.
This means a lengthy, dissuasive and sometimes humiliating process: several dossiers of application, with forms to fill in, photographs, supporting documents such as medical and car insurance, hotel reservation, proofs of subsistence, bank statements, etc.
They have to pay for the visas, travel to the city where the consulates are located and they have to queue in front of them.
They have to pay for the visas, travel to the city where the consulates are located and they have to queue in front of them.
This regime has also a negative effect on family and cultural ties , since in the case of third country nationals residing in Schengen states it can restrict the access to their homeland.
This regime has also a negative effect on family and cultural ties , since in the case of third country nationals residing in Schengen states it can restrict the access to their homeland.
All this situation is even more difficult to tolerate since the persons concerned do not represent any risk of illegal immigration or any threat to public policy as they have been submitted to several controls and screening either by a Schengen State or by another new Member State before the issuing of the Schengen visa, residence permit or the national visa.
All this situation is even more difficult to tolerate since the persons concerned do not represent any risk of illegal immigration or any threat to public policy as they have been submitted to several controls and screening either by a Schengen State or by another new Member State before the issuing of the Schengen visa, residence permit or the national visa.
For all these reasons, it is now crucial and urgent to adopt this Decision allowing the new Member States to opt in for the unilateral recognition of the visas and residence permits issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis including Norway, Iceland and Denmark and by other new Member States.
For all these reasons, it is now crucial and urgent to adopt this Decision allowing the new Member States to opt in for the unilateral recognition of the visas and residence permits issued by the Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis including Norway, Iceland and Denmark and by other new Member States.
This Decision will not only be useful for the ten new Member States, but it will also operate when Romania and Bulgaria join EU.
This Decision will not only be useful for the ten new Member States, but it will also operate when Romania and Bulgaria join EU.
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí zjednodušený režim kontrol osob na vnějších hranicích vycházející z jednostranného uznávání některých dokladů Českou republikou, Estonskem, Kyprem, Lotyšskem, Litvou, Maďarskem, Maltou, Polskem, Slovinskem a Slovenskem za rovnocenná jejich vnitrostátním vízům za účelem průjezdu přes jejich území
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories
AFET 16.11.2005
AFET 16.11.2005
Michael Cashman, 4.10.2005
Michael Cashman, 4.10.2005
o činnosti Smíšeného parlamentního shromáždění AKT–EU v roce 2005
on the work of the ACP‑EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in 2005
PE 367.836v02-00
PE 367.836v02-00
2000, s. 3. , která byla změněna v Lucemburku dne 25. června 2005,
3. and amended in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005,
– s ohledem na jednací řád Smíšeného parlamentního shromáždění (SPS) ve znění, které bylo naposledy změněno v Haagu dne 25. listopadu 2004
– having regard to the Rules of Procedure of the Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA), as last amended in The Hague on 25 November 2004
– s ohledem na usnesení a deklaraci, které Smíšené parlamentní shromáždění přijalo na svém 9. zasedání v Bamaku (Mali) ve dnech 16. až 21. dubna 2005
– having regard to the resolutions and the declaration adopted by the JPA at its ninth session in Bamako (Mali), from 16 to 21 April 2005
– pokroku v dosahování všeobecného základního vzdělání a rovnosti pohlaví v zemích AKT v souvislosti s Rozvojovými cíli tisíciletí,
- progress made in achieving universal primary education and gender equality in the ACP countries in the context of the Millennium Development Goals,
– pokonfliktové rehabilitaci v zemích AKT,
- post-conflict rehabilitation in ACP countries,
– rozpočtu Evropského rozvojového fondu,
- budgetisation of the European Development Fund,
– situaci v Súdánu,
- the situation in Sudan,
– situaci v oblasti Velkých jezer v Africe,
- the situation in the African Great Lakes Region,
– Deklaraci z Bamaka o Rozvojových cílech tisíciletí,
- the Bamako Declaration on the Millennium Development Goals,
– s ohledem na skutečnost, že Komise plní výše uvedená usnesení Smíšeného parlamentního shromáždění přijatá v Bamaku (Mali) dne 21. dubna 2005,
– having regard to the Commission follow‑up to the above JPA resolutions adopted in Bamako (Mali) on 21 April 2005,
– s ohledem na usnesení, která Smíšené parlamentní shromáždění přijalo na svém 10. zasedání v Edinburghu (Spojené království) ve dnech 19. až 24. listopadu 2005
– having regard to the resolutions adopted by the JPA at its 10th session in Edinburgh (United Kingdom), from 19 to 24 November 2005
4 Dosud nezveřejněna v Úředním věstníku. o:
Not yet published in the OJ. , on:
– roli národních parlamentů při uplatňování Dohody o partnerství z Cotonou,
- the role of national parliaments in implementing the Cotonou partnership agreement,
– zemědělských a těžebních komoditách,
- agricultural and mining commodities,
– příčinách a následcích přírodních katastrof,
- causes and consequences of natural disasters,
– registraci, vyhodnocování a schvalování chemikálií (REACH),
- registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH),
– situaci v západní Africe,
- the situation in West Africa,
– s ohledem na skutečnost, že Evropská komise plní usnesení Smíšeného parlamentního shromáždění přijatá v Haagu (Nizozemsko) dne 25. listopadu 2004 o:
– having regard to the Commission follow‑up to the JPA resolutions adopted in The Hague (Netherlands) on 25 November 2004 on:
– politickém dialogu AKT–EU (článek 8 Dohody z Cotonou),
- political dialogue (Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement),
– potravinové pomoci a bezpečnosti potravin,
- food aid and food security,
– situaci v Dárfúru,
- the situation in Darfur,
– škodách způsobených cyklóny v karibské oblasti,
- damage caused by cyclones in the Caribbean region,
– s ohledem na deklaraci spolupředsedů Smíšeného parlamentního shromáždění (SPS) paní Sharon Hay Websterové a paní Glenys Kinnockové o událostech, k nimž došlo v Togu poté, co dne 5. února 2005 zemřel prezident Gnassingbé Eyadéma,
– having regard to the statement by the Co-Presidents of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, Ms Sharon Hay Webster and Ms Glenys Kinnock, on the events in Togo following the death of President Gnassingbé Eyadéma on 5 February 2005,
– s ohledem na dopis Světového programu výživy ze dne 3. března 2005, který byl zaslán SPS,
– having regard to the letter of 3 March 2005 from the World Food Programme to the JPA,
– s ohledem na závěry Fóra žen SPS ze dne 16. dubna 2005 v Bamaku (Mali) o mrzačení genitálií žen,
– having regard to the conclusions of the JPA Women’s Forum of 16 April 2005 in Bamako (Mali) on female genital mutilation,
– s ohledem na poselství generálního tajemníka Organizace spojených národů (OSN) pana Kofiho Annana ze dne 18. dubna 2005 u příležitosti 9. zasedání SPS,
– having regard to the message from the Secretary‑General of the United Nations, Mr Kofi Annan, of 18 April 2005, on the occasion of the ninth session of the JPA,
– s ohledem na závěry Fóra žen SPS ze dne 19. listopadu 2005 v Edinburghu o obchodu s lidmi,
– having regard to the conclusions of the JPA Women’s Forum of 19 November 2005 in Edinburgh (United Kingdom) on human trafficking,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro rozvoj ( A6‑0063/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6‑0063/2006 ),
A. vzhledem k závěru jednání o revizi Dohody z Cotonou v roce 2005 a vzhledem k novým ustanovením, která se týkají zejména posilování politického dialogu, posilování parlamentů, Mezinárodního trestního soudu a spolupráce v boji proti terorismu a zbraním hromadného ničení,
A. having regard to the conclusion to the negotiations on the revision of the Cotonou Agreement in 2005 and the new measures concerning in particular the strengthening of political dialogue, the strengthening of parliaments, the International Criminal Court and cooperation in the fight against terrorism and weapons of mass destruction,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že SPS je skutečným vzorem celému světu, pokud jde o spolupráci a rozvoj, a že je velkým přínosem pro otevřený a rovnoprávný dialog mezi severem a jihem,
B. whereas the JPA stands as a model of cooperation and development in the world and is making a major contribution to open, fair dialogue between North and South,
C. vzhledem k významu úlohy SPS pro vedení politického dialogu podle článku 8 Dohody z Cotonou, zejména pokud jde o posilování demokracie, uplatňování řádné správy věcí veřejných a obranu lidských práv,
C. having regard to the importance of the JPA’s role in implementing the political dialogue provided for by Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement, particularly as regards strengthening democracy, implementing good governance and protecting human rights,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že v roce 2005 se uskutečnilo šest společných pracovních cest AKT–EU:
D. whereas six joint ACP-EU missions took place in 2005:
- na Šalamounových ostrovech, na Fidži a v Papue-Nové Guineji od 11. do 21. února 2005 s cílem setkat se s politickými orgány všech tří navštívených zemí a také se zástupci nevládních organizací a navštívit projekty financované v rámci Evropského rozvojového fondu,
– in the Solomon Islands, Fiji and Papua New Guinea from 11 to 21 February 2005, to meet the political authorities of the three countries visited and non‑governmental organisations (NGOs), and to visit projects financed under the EDF,
- v Rovníkové Guineji od 28. února do 4. března 2005 s cílem setkat se s tamními orgány a zaslat SPS doporučení týkající se situace v zemi,
– in Equatorial Guinea , from 28 February to 4 March 2005, to meet the representatives of the country’s authorities and to make recommendations to the JPA on the situation in the country,
- v Súdánu (Dárfúr) od 21. do 27. března 2005 s cílem připravit naléhavou rozpravu a usnesení na 9. zasedání v Bamaku,
– in Sudan (Darfur), from 21 to 27 March 2005, to prepare for the urgent debate and the resolution at the ninth session in Bamako,
- v Guyaně a na Jamajce od 14. do 21. října 2005 s cílem posoudit předpokládaný dopad navrhovaných reforem režimu cukru Evropské unie,
– in Guyana and Jamaica , from 14 to 21 October 2005, in order to investigate the likely impact of the proposed EU sugar reforms,
- v Tanzánii od 25. do 28. listopadu 2005 s cílem setkat se zde s vysokými představiteli politiky a institucí, se zástupci občanské společnosti a také s Východoafrickým společenstvím,
– in Tanzania , from 25 to 28 November 2005, to meet political and institutional leaders, as well as representatives of civil society and of the East African Community,
– v Panafrickém parlamentu v jihoafrickém Midrandu od 28. do 29. listopadu 2005 u příležitosti jeho čtvrtého řádného zasedání,
– to the Pan-African Parliament, in Midrand (South Africa), on 28 and 29 November 2005, on the occasion of its fourth ordinary session,
2. zdůrazňuje, že jednoduchá formulace obsažená v příloze 1a Dohody z Cotonou může být při určování částky víceletého rámce financování AKT-EU vykládána různě a že tato částka musí v každém případě odrážet hlavní politické závazky Evropské unie přijaté v roce 2005, pokud jde o oblast rozvoje a pomoci Africe;
Emphasises that the simple wording used in Annex Ia to the Cotonou Agreement is open to different interpretations with regard to determining the amount of the multiannual financial framework of ACP-EU cooperation and that, in any event, this amount must reflect the major political commitments made by the EU in 2005 on development and aid to Africa;
4. vyzývá SPS, aby pokračovalo v činnosti v oblasti lidských práv a přispělo tak k politickému dialogu podle článku 8 Dohody z Cotonou, případně prostřednictvím uspořádání veřejných slyšení; žádá, aby se občanská společnost ještě více podílela na činnosti SPS a jeho stálých výborů;
Calls on the JPA to continue its work on human rights and thereby contribute to the political dialogue provided for in Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement, if appropriate by organising public hearings; calls for greater involvement of civil society in the work of the JPA and its standing committees;
7. bere na vědomí, že stálé výbory již fungují v běžném rytmu, že jejich vytvoření v roce 2003 otevřelo nové možnosti diskuse a shody a že touto cestou se poslanci AKT a evropští poslanci nejen lépe poznali, ale také se naučili spolupracovat na základních tématech s cílem dospět vždy, kdy je to možné, ke společným postojům na plenárních zasedáních;
Notes that the standing committees are now working at a normal pace, that their creation in 2003 opened up new opportunities for debate and dialogue and that the ACP and European parliamentarians have thereby not only become better acquainted with each other, but have also learnt to cooperate on fundamental subjects with a view to reaching common positions during plenary sessions, wherever possible;
3 Dohody z Cotonou a článek 6 jednacího řádu); požaduje upřesnění funkcí místopředsedů odpovědných za rozpočet, aby se zvýšila transparentnost používání výdajů na fungování SPS a dohled předsednictva nad těmito finančními prostředky;
Calls on the JPA to take action in response to the message from the UN Secretary‑General, Mr Kofi Annan, on the occasion of the ninth session of the JPA in Bamako, according to whom ‘it is not in the United Nations that the Millennium Development Goals will be achieved.
9. vyzývá SPS, aby uplatnilo poselství generálního tajemníka OSN pana Kofiho Annana ze dne 18. dubna 2005 u příležitosti 9. zasedání SPS v Bamaku, podle nějž „cíle tisíciletí nemají být uskutečněny uvnitř Spojených národů, ale v každém z členských států prostřednictvím společného úsilí vlád a národů“;
They have to be achieved in each of its Member States, by the joint efforts of their governments and people’;
19. blahopřeje úřadu prezidenta a vládě Mali, malijským orgánům a různým územním sdružením k jejich významnému přínosu k 9. zasedání konanému v Bamaku, zejména k pracovním skupinám zabývajícím se následujícími tématy:
Congratulates the Presidency and the Government of Mali, the Malian authorities and various local associations for their valuable contribution to the ninth session in Bamako, particularly to the workshops on the following subjects:
- odvětví bavlny v Mali,
- the cotton sector in Mali,
- vysychání a záchrana řeky Nigeru,
- desertification and saving the River Niger,
20. vítá, že při střídání mezi jednou zemí AKT a jednou předsednickou zemí Evropské unie existuje již skutečná rovnocennost mezi zasedáními v zemích AKT a v evropských zemích;
Welcomes the fact that the alternation between an ACP country and the country holding the EU Presidency will henceforth make for real equivalence between the sessions in the ACP countries and in the European countries;