natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Příslušné orgány mohou úvěrové instituci, která má sekuritizovanou pozici bez ratingu, povolit , aby použila zacházení uvedené v odstavci 11 pro výpočet hodnoty rizikově vážené expozice pro tuto pozici za předpokladu, že složení portfolia sekuritizovaných expozic je vždy známé.
Competent authorities may permit a credit institution having an unrated securitisation position to apply the treatment set out in paragraph 11 for calculating the riskweighted exposure amount for that position provided the composition of the pool of exposures securitised is known at all times.
Úvěrová instituce, která má sekuritizovanou pozici bez ratingu, může použít zacházení uvedené v odstavci 11 pro výpočet hodnoty rizikově vážené expozice pro tuto pozici za předpokladu, že úvěrová instituce je schopna prokázat, že složení portfolia sekuritizovaných expozic je vždy známé.
A credit institution having an unrated securitisation position may apply the treatment set out in paragraph 11 for calculating the risk-weighted exposure amount for that position provided that the credit institution demonstrates that the composition of the pool of exposures securitised is known at all times.
Remove the national discretion and make it an option for credit institutions.
Remove the national discretion and make it an option for credit institutions.
V případě pojistek se zbytkovou platností kratší než jeden rok musí úvěrová instituce provést náležité snížení hodnoty, kterým zohlední zkracující se zbytkovou platnost dané pojistky; v případě pojistek se zbytkovou platností 90 dní nebo kratší může toto snížení dosáhnout až 100 %;
For policies with a residual term of less than one year, the credit institution must make appropriate haircuts reflecting the declining residual term of the policy, up to a full 100% haircut for policies with a residual term of 90 days or less;
V případě pojistek se zbytkovou platností kratší než jeden rok musí úvěrová instituce provést náležité snížení hodnoty, kterým zohlední zkracující se zbytkovou platnost dané pojistky; v případě pojistek se zbytkovou platností 90 dní nebo kratší může toto snížení dosáhnout až 100 %; toto opatření se nevztahuje na smlouvy, které se obnovují automaticky ;
For policies with a residual term of less than one year, the credit institution must make appropriate haircuts reflecting the declining residual term of the policy, up to a full 100% haircut for policies with a residual term of 90 days or less; this provision shall not apply to contracts with automatic renewal;
As regards the possibility of enjoying a reduction in capital weightings by virtue of insurance policies of a duration of more than one year, the most widespread practice is for policies on operational risks to be renewed annually with a range of different expiry dates.
As regards the possibility of enjoying a reduction in capital weightings by virtue of insurance policies of a duration of more than one year, the most widespread practice is for policies on operational risks to be renewed annually with a range of different expiry dates.
It is therefore possible that the residual term of insurance cover may be less than one year on the date of redemption of the capital requirement.
It is therefore possible that the residual term of insurance cover may be less than one year on the date of redemption of the capital requirement.
It is not logical to reduce the effect of this cover pro quota just because it is due for renewal.
It is not logical to reduce the effect of this cover pro quota just because it is due for renewal.
POZMĚŇOVACÍ NÁVRHY K NÁVRHU 2
AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSAL 2
a) in vestiční podniky, které obchodují na vlastní účet za účelem splnění nebo vykonání objednávky klienta nebo za účelem získání přístupu k zúčtovacímu a vypořádacímu systému nebo uznávané burze, jestliže jednají jako agentura nebo vykonávají objednávku klienta ;
(a) investment firms that deal on own account for the purpose of fulfilling or executing a client order or for the purpose of gaining entrance to a clearing and settlement system or a recognised exchange when acting in an agency capacity or executing a client order;
b) investiční podniky :
(b) investment firms:
i) které nedrží peníze nebo cenné papíry klienta ;
(i) that do not hold client money or securities;
ii) které uskutečňují pouze obchodování na vlastní účet ;
(ii) that undertake only dealing on own account;
iii) které nemají žádné vnější zákazníky ;
(iii) that have no external customers;
iv) u jejichž transakcí se výkon a vypořádání uskutečňují na odpovědnost clearingové instituce a jsou uvedenou clearingovou institucí zaručeny .
(iv) he execution and settlement of whose transactions takes place under the responsibility of a clearing institution and are guaranteed by that clearing institution.
Article 20(3) should be deleted because the specific derogation that it provides for, whereby certain investment firms would not be subject to the capital requirements for operational risk and, apart from own funds for credit and market risk, would have to ensure only a blanket coverage (25%) of the fixed joint costs from the preceding year, mixes market and operational risk in a technically incomprehensible manner and would potentially distort competition.
Article 20(3) should be deleted because the specific derogation that it provides for, whereby certain investment firms would not be subject to the capital requirements for operational risk and, apart from own funds for credit and market risk, would have to ensure only a blanket coverage (25%) of the fixed joint costs from the preceding year, mixes market and operational risk in a technically incomprehensible manner and would potentially distort competition.
Čl 20 odst.
Article 20, paragraph 4
Investiční podniky uvedené v odstavci 2 zůstanou předmětem všech ostatních ustanovení týkajících se operačního rizika a stanovených v příloze V směrnice [2000/12/ES].
Investment firms referred to in paragraph 2 shall remain subject to all other provisions regarding operational risk set out in Annex V of Directive [2000/12/EC].
Drafting adjustment resulting from the deletion of Article 20(3).
Drafting adjustment resulting from the deletion of Article 20(3).
d) s výhradou uvážení příslušných orgánů dlouhé a krátké pozice v aktivech emitovaných institucemi, která podléhají požadavkům na kapitálovou přiměřenost stanoveným ve směrnici [2000/12/ES].
(d) they are, subject to competent authorities discretion, long and short positions in assets issued by institutions subject to the capital adequacy requirements set forth in Directive [2000/12/EC].
d) dlouhé a krátké pozice v aktivech emitovaných institucemi, která podléhají požadavkům na kapitálovou přiměřenost stanoveným ve směrnici [2000/12/ES] a která splňují následující kritéria:
(d) long and short positions in assets issued by institutions subject to the capital adequacy requirements set out in Directive [2000/12/EC] and which meet the following criteria:
i) příslušné instituce je považují za dostatečně likvidní a
(i) they are considered by the institutions concerned to be sufficiently liquid, and
ii) jejich investiční kvality, v souladu s vlastním uvážením instituce, odpovídají alespoň kvalitám aktiv uvedených v písmenu a);
(ii) their investment quality is, according to the institutions' own discretion, at least equivalent to that of the assets referred to under point (a);
Remove the national discretion, but add criteria on solvency and liquidity.
Remove the national discretion, but add criteria on solvency and liquidity.
( KOM(2004)0486 – C6 0141/2004 – 2004/0155(COD) )
COM(2004)0486 – C6 0141/2004 – 2004/0155(COD)
( KOM(2004)0486 – C6 0144/2004 – 2004/0159(COD) )
COM(2004)0486 – C6 0144/2004 – 2004/0159(COD)
Maria Berger 3.2.2005
Maria Berger 3.2.2005
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se přepracovává směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2000/12/ES ze dne 20. března 2000 o přístupu k činnosti úvěrových institucí a o jejím výkonu
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council re-casting Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions
KOM(2004)0486 – C6 0141/2004 – 2004/0155(COD)
COM(2004)0486 – C6 0141/2004 – 2004/0155(COD)
ECON 14.4.2005
ECON 14.4.2005
Alexander Radwan 21.9.2004
Alexander Radwan 21.9.2004
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se přepracovává směrnice Rady 93/6/EHS ze dne 15. března 1993 o kapitálové přiměřenosti investičních podniků a úvěrových institucí
Proposal for a irective of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Directive 93/6/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Bulharskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Bulgaria on certain aspects of air services
PE 360.244v02-00
PE 360.244v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0158 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0158 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0258/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0258/2005 ),
International aviation relations between Member States and third countries have been traditionally governed by bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries, their Annexes and other related bilateral or multilateral arrangements.
International aviation relations between Member States and third countries have been traditionally governed by bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries, their Annexes and other related bilateral or multilateral arrangements.
Following the judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Cases C-466/98, C-467/98, C-468/98, C-471/98, C-472/98, C-475/98 and C-476/98, the Community has exclusive competence with respect to various aspects of external aviation.
Following the judgements of the Court of Justice of the European Communities in Cases C-466/98, C-467/98, C-468/98, C-471/98, C-472/98, C-475/98 and C-476/98, the Community has exclusive competence with respect to various aspects of external aviation.
The Court of Justice also clarified the right of Community air carriers to benefit from the right of establishment within the Community, including the right to non-discriminatory market access.
The Court of Justice also clarified the right of Community air carriers to benefit from the right of establishment within the Community, including the right to non-discriminatory market access.
Traditional designation clauses in Member States’ bilateral air services agreements infringe Community law.
Traditional designation clauses in Member States’ bilateral air services agreements infringe Community law.
They allow a third country to reject, withdraw or suspend the permissions or authorisations of an air carrier that has been designated by a Member State but that is not substantially owned and effectively controlled by that Member State or its nationals.
They allow a third country to reject, withdraw or suspend the permissions or authorisations of an air carrier that has been designated by a Member State but that is not substantially owned and effectively controlled by that Member State or its nationals.
This has been found to constitute discrimination against Community carriers established in the territory of a Member State but owned and controlled by nationals of other Member States.
This has been found to constitute discrimination against Community carriers established in the territory of a Member State but owned and controlled by nationals of other Member States.
This is contrary to Article 43 of the Treaty which guarantees nationals of Member States who have exercised their freedom of establishment the same treatment in the host Member State as that accorded to nationals of that Member State.
This is contrary to Article 43 of the Treaty which guarantees nationals of Member States who have exercised their freedom of establishment the same treatment in the host Member State as that accorded to nationals of that Member State.
Following the Court of Justice judgements, the Council authorised the Commission in June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.
Following the Court of Justice judgements, the Council authorised the Commission in June 2003 to open negotiations with third countries on the replacement of certain provisions in existing bilateral agreements with a Community agreement.
Council decision 11323/03 of 5 June 2003 (restricted document)
Council decision 11323/03 of 5 June 2003 (restricted document)
In accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council’s decision authorising the Commission to open those negotiations , the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Bulgaria that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the Republic of Bulgaria.
In accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council’s decision authorising the Commission to open those negotiations , the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Bulgaria that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the Republic of Bulgaria.
Article 2 of the Agreement replaces the traditional designation clauses with a Community designation clause, permitting all Community carriers to benefit from the right of establishment.
Article 2 of the Agreement replaces the traditional designation clauses with a Community designation clause, permitting all Community carriers to benefit from the right of establishment.
Articles 4 and 5 of the Agreement address two types of clauses concerning matters of Community competence.
Articles 4 and 5 of the Agreement address two types of clauses concerning matters of Community competence.
Article 4 deals with the taxation of aviation fuel, a matter which has been harmonised by Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, particularly Article 14 paragraph 2 thereof.
Article 4 deals with the taxation of aviation fuel, a matter which has been harmonised by Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, particularly Article 14 paragraph 2 thereof.
Article 5 (ricing) resolves conflicts between the existing bilateral air services agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.
Article 5 (ricing) resolves conflicts between the existing bilateral air services agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.
The proposed Council decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to sign on behalf of the Community the above-mentioned Agreement on a provisional basis until it enters into force after completion of the necessary procedures.
The proposed Council decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to sign on behalf of the Community the above-mentioned Agreement on a provisional basis until it enters into force after completion of the necessary procedures.
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement underthe consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph 7, which reads as follows:
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement underthe consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph 7, which reads as follows:
On the basis of the above your rapporteur suggests that the Committee on Transport and Tourism should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Agreement.
On the basis of the above your rapporteur suggests that the Committee on Transport and Tourism should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of this Agreement.
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Bulharskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Bulgaria on certain aspects of air services
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Chorvatskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia on certain aspects of air services
PE 360.243v02-00
PE 360.243v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0159 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0159 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0259/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0259/2005 ),
In accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council’s decision authorising the Commission to open those negotiations, the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Croatia that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the Republic of Croatia.
In accordance with the mechanisms and directives in the Annex to the Council’s decision authorising the Commission to open those negotiations, the Commission has negotiated an agreement with the Republic of Croatia that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the Republic of Croatia.
Article 4 deals with the taxation of aviation fuel, a matter which has been harmonised by Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, particularly Article 14 paragraph 2, thereof.
Article 4 deals with the taxation of aviation fuel, a matter which has been harmonised by Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, particularly Article 14 paragraph 2, thereof.
Article 5 (pricing) resolves conflicts between the existing bilateral air services agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.
Article 5 (pricing) resolves conflicts between the existing bilateral air services agreements and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2409/92 on fares and rates for air services which prohibits third country carriers from being price leaders on air services for carriage wholly within the Community.
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph, 7, which reads as follows:
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement under the consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph, 7, which reads as follows:
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Chorvatskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Croatia on certain aspects of air services
k návrhu doporučení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o další evropské spolupráci při zajišťování kvality v oblasti vysokoškolského vzdělávání
on the proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on further European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education
PE 359.988v03-00
PE 359.988v03-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................12
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................7
k návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o další evropské spolupráci při zajišťování kvality v oblasti vysokoškolského vzdělávání
on the proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on further European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2004)0642 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0642 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro kulturu a vzdělávání ( A6‑0261/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0261/2005 ),
(1) Přestože provedení doporučení Rady ze dne 24. září 1998 o evropské spolupráci při zajišťování kvality v oblasti vysokoškolského vzdělávání bylo podle zprávy Komise ze dne 30. září 2004 (KOM (2004) 0620) úspěšné, je třeba zlepšit fungování evropské ho vysokoškolské ho vzdělávání, zejména pokud jde o kvalitu, aby bylo transparentnější a důvěryhodnější pro evropské občany i pro studenty a vědce z jiných světadílů.
(1) although the implementation of the Council recommendation of 24 September 1998 on European cooperation in quality assurance in higher education has been a marked success as demonstrated in the report of the Commission of 30 September 2004 ( COM( 2004)0620) , there is still a need to improve the performance of European higher education , particularly as regards quality, for it to become more transparent and trustworthy for European citizens and for students and scholars from other continents.
European cooperation on quality assurance in higher education must contribute in the first instance to enhancing the quality of higher education in the Member States.
European cooperation on quality assurance in higher education must contribute in the first instance to enhancing the quality of higher education in the Member States.
This should be mentioned straight away in the first recital.
This should be mentioned straight away in the first recital.