natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Świadomość wznowienia przez KE i Radę intensywnych prac nad udoskonaleniem Rozporządzenia, uzyskanych już efektów (m. in dzięki uwzględnieniu krytycznych uwag Komisji Rybołówstwa PE), pozwoliła sprawozdawcy na ponowne odniesienie się do kwestii, które wywoływały dotychczas najwięcej dyskusji.
The awareness that the renewal of intensive efforts by the Commission and Council to improve the regulation was already producing results (thanks in part to their consideration of the Committee on Fisheries' criticisms) allowed the rapporteur to concern himself once again with the issues that had so far provoked the most discussion.
Za usprawiedliwioną należy uznać opinię, że pławnice łososiowe stosowane w południowej części Bałtyku stanowią minimalne zagrożenie dla morświnów, które występują tu jedynie śladowo.
It should be acknowledged that the salmon driftnets used in the southern Baltic pose a minimal threat to porpoise, which are now extremely rare in the area.
Prawdą jest również i to, że zalecana w rozporządzeniu (i zgodna z wcześniejszymi postanowieniami Komisji Rybołówstwa PE) decyzja o likwidacji tych urządzeń pozbawi możliwości łowienie łososia około 60. polskich armatorów.
It is also true that the abolition of this sort of equipment, as proposed in the regulation in line previous resolutions of the Committee on Fisheries, would prevent around 60 Polish shipowners from fishing for salmon.
Niepokojące jednak komunikaty z ostatnich dni, mówiące o zmniejszaniu się populacji morświnów, nakazują zachowanie szczególnej roztropności, konieczność naprawdę wnikliwego zbadania tego problemu.
However, the worrying reports over the last few days of the declining porpoise population calls for particular prudence and a thorough examination of this problem.
W autopoprawce sprawozdawca starał się zatem uwzględnić intencje autorów tego artykułu.
In his amendments, the rapporteur endeavoured, therefore, to take into account the intentions of the regulation's authors.
Troska o uzasadnione obawy rybaków bałtyckich co do dalszych ich losów każe jednak podjąć jakieś działania zaradcze, a zwłaszcza przystąpienie do intensywnych prób ustalenia stanu faktycznego.
Nevertheless, the issue of the Baltic fishermen's justifiable fears about their future requires remedial action, and in particular serious attempts to establish the real state of affairs.
Zaleca się mianowicie przeprowadzenie do dnia 1 stycznia 2008 r. ewaluacji skutków stosowania pławnic i innych narzędzi oplątujących w odniesieniu do ssaków morskich.
An evaluation of the effects on sea mammals of using driftnets and other entangling equipment should be carried out up to 1 January 2008.
W zależności od wyników tej gruntownej oceny podjęte zostaną ostateczne decyzje w sprawie dalszego stosowania, względnie wycofania pławnic.
The results of this thorough evaluation would then determine the final decision as to the continued use or withdrawal of driftnets.
Zarysowuje się także możliwość kompromisowego rozwiązania problemu sprzętu dla połowu dorsza.
The possibility of a compromise solution to the issue of cod-fishing gear is also emerging.
KE i Rada zdają się coraz bardziej skłaniać ku możliwości stosowania, obok zalecanego w Rozporządzeniu okna wyjściowego (dla młodego narybku) typu BACOMA, również już sprawdzonego worka T-90.
The Commission and Council seem increasingly to favour the possibility of using the tried and tested T90 codend, in addition to the BACOMA-type exit window (for young fish) recommended in the regulation.
Do stosownej autopoprawki załączono specyfikację techniczną tego urządzenie w przeświadczeniu, że propozycja ta znajdzie również poparcie naszej Komisji.
The rapporteur included the technical specifications of this equipment in the relevant amendment, confident that the proposal will find support in the Committee on Fisheries.
Reasumując należy podkreślić, że projekt Rozporządzenia Rady, datowany na 14 marca 2005 r., znajduje się w fazie intensywnych przeróbek.
In summary, it should be stressed that the proposal for a Council regulation dated 14 March 2005 is in the process of being extensively altered.
Po zakończeniu podstawowych prac przez KE do prac modyfikacyjnych przystąpiła Rada, która prowadzi szerokie negocjacje z zainteresowanymi krajami.
After the Commission had completed the groundwork, the Council began the task of making changes and is holding extensive negotiations with the countries concerned.
Powtórzmy na koniec, że waga rozpatrywanego dokumentu, jego specjalny charakter oraz znaczenie dla rozwoju rybołówstwa bałtyckiego (zwłaszcza zachowania zasobów połowowych) wymagają gruntownego rozpoznania problemu, rozwagi w ferowaniu ostatecznych rozstrzygnięć.
In conclusion, I should like to stress that the importance of the proposal, its special nature and its significance to the development of Baltic fishing (particularly in maintaining fish stocks) all require thorough recognition of the problem and sound judgment when the final decisions are made.
Rozstrzygnięć, które przydatne będą tylko wówczas, gdy kompetentnie zdefiniują „literę i ducha” bałtyckich realiów.
These decisions will be useful only if they properly reflect the spirit and the letter of the Baltic situation.
Návrh nařízení Rady, kterým se stanoví technická opatření pro zachování rybolovných zdrojů ve vodách Baltského moře, Velkého a Malého Beltu a Øresundu a mění nařízení (ES) č. 1434/98
Proposal for a Council regulation on the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures in the Baltic Sea, the Belts and the Sound and amending Regulation (EC) No 1434/98
PECH 14.4.2005
PECH 14.4.2005
Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski 30.3.2005
Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski 30.3.2005
Elspeth Attwooll, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, David Casa, Paulo Casaca, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Alfred Gomolka, Pedro Guerreiro, Ian Hudghton, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Seán Ó Neachtain, Neil Parish, Willi Piecyk, Bernard Poignant, Margie Sudre, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna
Elspeth Attwooll, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, David Casa, Paulo Casaca, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Alfred Gomolka, Pedro Guerreiro, Ian Hudghton, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Seán Ó Neachtain, Neil Parish, Willi Piecyk, Bernard Poignant, Margie Sudre, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna
Dorette Corbey, María Isabel Salinas García
Dorette Corbey, María Isabel Salinas García
Eugenijus Gentvilas, Grażyna Staniszewska, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
Eugenijus Gentvilas, Grażyna Staniszewska, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski
DRUHÁ ZPRÁVA
SECOND REPORT
PE 360.051v03-00
PE 360.051v03-00
o návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (EHS) č. 2759/75, nařízení (EHS) č. 2771/75, nařízení (EHS) č. 2777/75, nařízení (ES) č. 1254/1999, nařízení (ES) č. 1255/1999 a nařízení (ES) č. 2529/2001, pokud jde o výjimečná opatření na podporu trhu
on the proposal for a Council regulation on amending Regulations (EEC) No 2759/75, (EEC) No 2771/75, (EEC) No 2777/75, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1255/1999 and (EC) No 2529/2001 as regards exceptional market support measures
– s ohledem na druhou zprávu Výboru pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova ( A6–0266/2005 ),
– having regard to the second report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0266/2005 ),
(3a) Je nutné, aby členské státy zajistily, že nebude docházet k narušování hospodářské soutěže v případech, kdy členské státy zapojí výrobce do financování částek, které mají samy platit.
(3a) Member States should ensure that distortion of competition does not arise in the event that Member States involve producers in providing part of the funding which they have taken on.
Společenství se podílí na financování opatření uvedených v odstavci 1 do výše 50 % výdajů, které hradí členské státy.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 50% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Společenství se podílí na financování opatření uvedených v odstavci 1 do výše 75 % výdajů, které hradí členské státy.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 75% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Co-financing of measures by the Member States is desirable in order to strengthen the motivation to avoid outbreaks of disease.
Co-financing of measures by the Member States is desirable in order to strengthen the motivation to avoid outbreaks of disease.
However, so as not to jeopardise the effective combating of disease in the poorer Member States and to ensure the protection of health and consumers in the interests of the Community, the Community’s contribution should be set at a high level.
However, so as not to jeopardise the effective combating of disease in the poorer Member States and to ensure the protection of health and consumers in the interests of the Community, the Community’s contribution should be set at a high level.
Členské státy musejí zajistit, že pokud výrobci přispívají na výdaje, které nesou členské státy, nedojde k narušení hospodářské soutěže mezi výrobci v různých členských státech.
Member States must ensure that, where producers contribute to the expenditure borne by Member States, this does not result in distortion of competition between producers in different Member States.
Komise sleduje, zda k tomuto narušování hospodářské soutěže dochází, a v případě potřeby přijme vhodná opatření.
The Commission shall monitor whether any such distortion of competition is taking place and shall take action as appropriate.
Komise informuje každých šest měsíců Evropský parlament a Radu o situaci ohledně narušování hospodářské soutěže.
The Commission shall report every six months to the European Parliament and the Council on the situation regarding distortion of competition.
Komise sleduje, zda k tomuto narušování hospodářské soutěže dochází, a v případě potřeby bude jedná.
The Commission shall monitor whether any such distortion of competition is taking place and shall take action as appropriate.
ČLÁNEK 3
ARTICLE 3
Společenství se podílí na financování opatření uvedených v odstavci 1 do výše 60 % výdajů, které hradí členské státy.
The Community shall provide part-financing for the measures referred to in paragraph 1 equivalent to 60% of the expenditure borne by Member States.
Komise sleduje, zda k tomuto narušování hospodářské soutěže dochází, a v případě potřeby jedná.
The Commission shall monitor whether any such distortion of competition is taking place and shall take action as appropriate.
ČLÁNEK 6
ARTICLE 6
With this proposal, the Commission seeks to alter the financing of exceptional market support measures applied in the case of outbreaks of infectious diseases such as, for example, Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Classical Swine Fever (CSF).
With this proposal, the Commission seeks to alter the financing of exceptional market support measures applied in the case of outbreaks of infectious diseases such as, for example, Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Classical Swine Fever (CSF).
Even though the Commission has in practice used a degree of co-financing for this exceptional market support, under the relevant Council regulations only 100% funding from the EC budget is possible, and this is confirmed by the European Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-239/01
Even though the Commission has in practice used a degree of co-financing for this exceptional market support, under the relevant Council regulations only 100% funding from the EC budget is possible, and this is confirmed by the European Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-239/01
The Commission’s main argument in favour of co-financing is that the Member States are responsible for the measures to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
The Commission’s main argument in favour of co-financing is that the Member States are responsible for the measures to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
By also placing a financial responsibility on the Member States, the Commission expects them to make a greater effort to stamp out diseases as quickly as possible and to minimise the costs.
By also placing a financial responsibility on the Member States, the Commission expects them to make a greater effort to stamp out diseases as quickly as possible and to minimise the costs.
The Commission further bases its proposal on Special Report 1/2000
The Commission further bases its proposal on Special Report 1/2000
The Court of Auditors considers that the existing distinction gives the Member States an incentive to ensure that as much as possible of the costs are financed from exceptional market support measures, where the level of EU funding is highest.
The Court of Auditors considers that the existing distinction gives the Member States an incentive to ensure that as much as possible of the costs are financed from exceptional market support measures, where the level of EU funding is highest.
In his first report your rapporteur explained in detail why, in his view, the Commission’s arguments could not outweigh the particularly negative consequences which the Commission proposal might have for the Common Agricultural Policy in general and the conditions of competition in European agriculture in particular.
In his first report your rapporteur explained in detail why, in his view, the Commission’s arguments could not outweigh the particularly negative consequences which the Commission proposal might have for the Common Agricultural Policy in general and the conditions of competition in European agriculture in particular.
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission submitted its report without first carrying out a thorough investigation of the consequences in terms of competition of having up to 25 different systems for the funding of the national part of the subsidy measures.
Your rapporteur considers that the Commission submitted its report without first carrying out a thorough investigation of the consequences in terms of competition of having up to 25 different systems for the funding of the national part of the subsidy measures.
At your rapporteur’s recommendation, therefore, on 26 April 2005 the Commission proposal was rejected by an overwhelming majority in the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.
At your rapporteur’s recommendation, therefore, on 26 April 2005 the Commission proposal was rejected by an overwhelming majority in the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.
The European Parliament concurred with the committee’s view and rejected the Commission proposal at its sitting in Strasbourg on 10 May 2005.
The European Parliament concurred with the committee’s view and rejected the Commission proposal at its sitting in Strasbourg on 10 May 2005.
Since the Commission did not immediately announce that it would be withdrawing its proposal, the matter was referred back to committee for further consideration pursuant to the Rules of Procedure.
Since the Commission did not immediately announce that it would be withdrawing its proposal, the matter was referred back to committee for further consideration pursuant to the Rules of Procedure.
Following the vote in plenary, Commissioner Louis Michel made the following statement on behalf of the Commission:
Following the vote in plenary, Commissioner Louis Michel made the following statement on behalf of the Commission:
“Mr President, while regretting the result of the vote, the Commission has duly noted the position expressed by a majority of the Members of the European Parliament.
“Mr President, while regretting the result of the vote, the Commission has duly noted the position expressed by a majority of the Members of the European Parliament.
In line with the framework agreement between Parliament and the Commission, the matter will be raised in the College of Commissioners with a view to a very careful consideration of the Commission’s position in these circumstances.
In line with the framework agreement between Parliament and the Commission, the matter will be raised in the College of Commissioners with a view to a very careful consideration of the Commission’s position in these circumstances.
The Commission will inform Parliament in the near future in an appropriate manner of the results of its deliberations.”
The Commission will inform Parliament in the near future in an appropriate manner of the results of its deliberations.”
On 1 July the Commissioner responsible wrote to the chairman of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, with a copy to your rapporteur, in which he set out the Commission’s view on the points raised in the original report.
On 1 July the Commissioner responsible wrote to the chairman of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, with a copy to your rapporteur, in which he set out the Commission’s view on the points raised in the original report.
Your rapporteur wishes to draw your particular attention to page 3 of this letter, which states:
Your rapporteur wishes to draw your particular attention to page 3 of this letter, which states:
‘I note that in all the market support measures applied in the past, the national part was fully financed by the national budget.
‘I note that in all the market support measures applied in the past, the national part was fully financed by the national budget.
However, if Member States transfer the costs to the farmers and the industry, the Commission must insist that this should not lead to distortion of competition.
However, if Member States transfer the costs to the farmers and the industry, the Commission must insist that this should not lead to distortion of competition.
I therefore recognise this problem and should any amendments to that effect be adopted, the Commission would be prepared to address these concerns during the final discussions in the Council.
I therefore recognise this problem and should any amendments to that effect be adopted, the Commission would be prepared to address these concerns during the final discussions in the Council.
I also intend to monitor closely any new operations to ascertain that no distortion of competition will occur.
I also intend to monitor closely any new operations to ascertain that no distortion of competition will occur.
The Parliament will be informed of any findings in this respect, as will national authorities responsible for maintaining a level playing field.
The Parliament will be informed of any findings in this respect, as will national authorities responsible for maintaining a level playing field.
Finally I would like to draw your attention to the Commission's communication on risk and crisis management, which could provide supplementary relief for farmers.
Finally I would like to draw your attention to the Commission's communication on risk and crisis management, which could provide supplementary relief for farmers.
The options outlined in the document include the possibility of introducing a system of public finance support for the establishment of insurance regimes, that could provide further assistance to farmers in case of a disease outbreak.
The options outlined in the document include the possibility of introducing a system of public finance support for the establishment of insurance regimes, that could provide further assistance to farmers in case of a disease outbreak.
The discussion on this communication is under way.
The discussion on this communication is under way.
I am pleased to note that the Parliament will have an opportunity shortly to offer its input on the subject.
I am pleased to note that the Parliament will have an opportunity shortly to offer its input on the subject.
In the meantime, we should be able to continue with exceptional market support measures, based on a cost sharing between Member States and the Community, which have proved their effectiveness in the past.’
In the meantime, we should be able to continue with exceptional market support measures, based on a cost sharing between Member States and the Community, which have proved their effectiveness in the past.’
This written acknowledgement of the Commission’s wish to ensure that co-financing does not lead to any distortions of competition in the Internal Market is tantamount in your rapporteur’s view to an admission that the Commission’s proposal was defective in this area.
This written acknowledgement of the Commission’s wish to ensure that co-financing does not lead to any distortions of competition in the Internal Market is tantamount in your rapporteur’s view to an admission that the Commission’s proposal was defective in this area.
Your rapporteur is still of the opinion that a better result could have been achieved if the Commission had withdrawn its original proposal and replaced it with a new one.
Your rapporteur is still of the opinion that a better result could have been achieved if the Commission had withdrawn its original proposal and replaced it with a new one.
In the mean time your rapporteur, in the light of the above-mentioned guarantees from the Commission, recommends that the committee approve the proposal with amendments to eliminate the risk of distortion of competition, and make the system an interim one until an alternative funding model is found in the form of insurance, the creation of a fund or similar measures during the further consideration of the Commission’s communication on risk and crisis management in agriculture.
In the mean time your rapporteur, in the light of the above-mentioned guarantees from the Commission, recommends that the committee approve the proposal with amendments to eliminate the risk of distortion of competition, and make the system an interim one until an alternative funding model is found in the form of insurance, the creation of a fund or similar measures during the further consideration of the Commission’s communication on risk and crisis management in agriculture.
Your rapporteur looks to the Commission to work indefatigably towards the adoption of these amendments in the Council.
Your rapporteur looks to the Commission to work indefatigably towards the adoption of these amendments in the Council.
články 36 a 37 ES
Article 36 and 37 EC
Niels Busk 23.11.2004
Niels Busk 23.11.2004
Filip Adwent, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, , Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf , María Esther Herranz García, , Mairead McGuinness, Neil Parish, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Witold Tomczak, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Janusz Wojciechowski
Filip Adwent, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, , Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf , María Esther Herranz García, , Mairead McGuinness, Neil Parish, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Witold Tomczak, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Janusz Wojciechowski
Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García,
Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García,
A 6-0126/2005
A 6-0126/2005
VRÁCENÍ VĚCI VÝBORU
REFERRAL BACK TO COMMITTEE
Datum vrácení věci výboru Základ v jednacím řádu
Date referred back to committee Basis in Rules of Procedure
10.5.2005 5.7.2005
10.5.2005 5.7.2005
Lhůta pro oznámení závěrů
Deadline for reporting back
Zpravodaj Datum potvrzení/jmenování
Rapporteur (s) Date confirmed/appointed