natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
On these points the common position probably represents a compromise between the various national interests, which play a significant role in the drawing up of this directive.
On these points the common position probably represents a compromise between the various national interests, which play a significant role in the drawing up of this directive.
Parliament must now consider which of the amendments adopted at first reading it now wishes to reintroduce at second reading.
Parliament must now consider which of the amendments adopted at first reading it now wishes to reintroduce at second reading.
The rapporteur takes the view that the original 1976 directive needed updating, but asked at first reading whether bathing water quality in Europe must still be regulated from Brussels.
The rapporteur takes the view that the original 1976 directive needed updating, but asked at first reading whether bathing water quality in Europe must still be regulated from Brussels.
An aspect to which Parliament paid attention at first reading was the legal basis for the proposed bathing water directive.
An aspect to which Parliament paid attention at first reading was the legal basis for the proposed bathing water directive.
Article 175 (1) was chosen as the legal basis.
Article 175 (1) was chosen as the legal basis.
That means that the Commission has drawn up this directive within the context of environmental legislation.
That means that the Commission has drawn up this directive within the context of environmental legislation.
The Commission justifies its approach mainly by referring to the effects on tourism.
The Commission justifies its approach mainly by referring to the effects on tourism.
It was suggested that this legislation should come under Article 95 on the free movement of persons.
It was suggested that this legislation should come under Article 95 on the free movement of persons.
Despite the doubts about subsidiarity and the legal basis, the proposal was adopted at first reading.
Despite the doubts about subsidiarity and the legal basis, the proposal was adopted at first reading.
Among the amendments by Parliament not incorporated by the Council, two stand out in particular.
Among the amendments by Parliament not incorporated by the Council, two stand out in particular.
Firstly, the Council's decision not to extend the scope of the directive to apply to other recreational activities.
Firstly, the Council's decision not to extend the scope of the directive to apply to other recreational activities.
If water used for other recreational activities than bathing is not to fall within the scope of this directive, the recreational users concerned must at least be informed about the quality of the waters where they are engaging in such activities.
If water used for other recreational activities than bathing is not to fall within the scope of this directive, the recreational users concerned must at least be informed about the quality of the waters where they are engaging in such activities.
In that way they can make a considered choice in each case as to whether they wish to practise such activities in the waters concerned.
In that way they can make a considered choice in each case as to whether they wish to practise such activities in the waters concerned.
Secondly, the Council has introduced a distinction between inland waters and coastal waters.
Secondly, the Council has introduced a distinction between inland waters and coastal waters.
Until the distinction between inland and coastal waters is supported by scientific evidence and therefore credible, it is completely incomprehensible to citizens that inland waters should not have to meet the same requirements as coastal waters.
Until the distinction between inland and coastal waters is supported by scientific evidence and therefore credible, it is completely incomprehensible to citizens that inland waters should not have to meet the same requirements as coastal waters.
The rapporteur is accordingly proposing to abolish this distinction and bring the text into line with the original Commission proposal.
The rapporteur is accordingly proposing to abolish this distinction and bring the text into line with the original Commission proposal.
On the other hand, there is something to be said for the additional classification of quality, 'sufficient', introduced by the Council.
On the other hand, there is something to be said for the additional classification of quality, 'sufficient', introduced by the Council.
An additional classification that would provide the same level of health protection as the minimum requirements of the existing directive acts as a stepping stone to 'good' or 'excellent' quality.
An additional classification that would provide the same level of health protection as the minimum requirements of the existing directive acts as a stepping stone to 'good' or 'excellent' quality.
In order to motivate the Member States to strive to achieve better bathing water quality, good information is very important.
In order to motivate the Member States to strive to achieve better bathing water quality, good information is very important.
It cannot therefore be emphasised enough that the public must have good access to information both via the Internet and at the bathing locations themselves.
It cannot therefore be emphasised enough that the public must have good access to information both via the Internet and at the bathing locations themselves.
Every recreational user cannot, after all, be expected to have a laptop with him/her at the coast in order to check whether water complies with the required standards.
Every recreational user cannot, after all, be expected to have a laptop with him/her at the coast in order to check whether water complies with the required standards.
In addition, the information available must be up-to-date and not show the bathing water quality for a year ago, and it should be provided in at least English and French.
In addition, the information available must be up-to-date and not show the bathing water quality for a year ago, and it should be provided in at least English and French.
The Council emphasises in its statement of reasons the use of signs and symbols, but this is not adequately reflected in the wording of the common position.
The Council emphasises in its statement of reasons the use of signs and symbols, but this is not adequately reflected in the wording of the common position.
It is necessary to strengthen the wording by reintroducing an amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading which provides for the Commission to develop a simple, standardised system of symbols.
It is necessary to strengthen the wording by reintroducing an amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading which provides for the Commission to develop a simple, standardised system of symbols.
The Council deviates from the original proposal in limiting the article on emergency plans.
The Council deviates from the original proposal in limiting the article on emergency plans.
A large number of floods have again recently occurred in several Member States, and precisely now is the time for an article on emergency plans, including the provision of related information to the public.
A large number of floods have again recently occurred in several Member States, and precisely now is the time for an article on emergency plans, including the provision of related information to the public.
It is also possible to improve the common position with regard to public participation.
It is also possible to improve the common position with regard to public participation.
It is therefore recommended that Parliament's amendment from first reading on this point be reintroduced.
It is therefore recommended that Parliament's amendment from first reading on this point be reintroduced.
Společný postoj Rady k přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o řízení jakosti vod ke koupání a o zrušení směrnice 76/160/EHS
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the management of bathing water quality and repealing Directive 76/160/EEC
Datum prvního čtení v EP – P5
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P5
Datum, kdy bylo na plenárním zasedání oznámeno obdržení společného postoje
Date receipt of common position announced in plenary
ENVI 7.11.2002
ENVI 7.11.2002
Jules Maaten 18.1.2005
Jules Maaten 18.1.2005
Georgs Andrejevs, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber a Åsa Westlund.
Georgs Andrejevs, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Norbert Glante, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Caroline Jackson, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Adriana Poli Bortone, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber and Åsa Westlund.
Edit Herczog, Eluned Morgan, Seán Ó Neachtain, Paul Rübig, Ursula Stenzel
Edit Herczog, Eluned Morgan, Seán Ó Neachtain, Paul Rübig, Ursula Stenzel
k návrhu směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 2003/88/ES o některých aspektech úpravy pracovní doby
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time
Symboly postupů
Symbols for procedures
**II Postup spolupráce (druhé čtení) ke schválení společného postoje je zapotřebí většiny odevzdaných hlasů k zamítnutí či změně společného postoje je třeba hlasů většiny všech poslanců Parlamentu
**II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
*** Postup souhlasu je třeba hlasů většiny všech poslanců Parlamentu s výjimkou případů uvedených v článcích 105, 107, 161 a 300 Smlouvy o založení ES a článku 7 Smlouvy o EU
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***II Postup spolurozhodování (druhé čtení) ke schválení společného postoje je třeba většiny odevzdaných hlasů k zamítnutí či změně společného postoje je třeba hlasů většiny všech poslanců Parlamentu
***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
***III Postup spolurozhodování (třetí čtení) ke schválení společného znění je třeba většiny odevzdaných hlasů
***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
(Typ postupu závisí na právním základě navrženém Komisí.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission)
Pozměňovací návrhy k legislativnímu znění
Amendments to a legislative text
V pozměňovacích návrzích Parlamentu je pozměněné znění vyznačeno tučně a kurzivou.
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
Vyznačení běžnou kurzivou má na příslušné části textu upozornit jednotlivé útvary a pomoci jim s přípravou konečného znění tím, že části legislativního znění, u kterých se navrhuje úprava, jsou takto zvýrazněny (například zjevné chyby či nedostatky v dané jazykové verzi).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
Tyto navrhované úpravy jsou věcí dohody dotčených útvarů.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................16
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................25
STANOVISKO Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ...........................21
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............29
STANOVISKO Výboru pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví ...............................28
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...36
(postup spolurozhodování: první čtení)
(Codecision procedure: first reading)
C... / Dosud nezveřejněno v Úředním věstníku. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na článek 51 jednacího řádu Evropského parlamentu,
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci a stanoviska Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku a Výboru pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví ( A6‑0105/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0105/2005 ),
PRÁVNÍ VÝCHODISKO 2 A (nové)
CITATION 2 A (new)
S ohledem na závěry lisabonského zasedání Rady.
Having regard to the conclusions of the Lisbon Council.
Po vypracování původního návrhu směrnice byly přijaty významné lisabonské závěry, které by měly být v tomto přezkumu také zohledněny.
The important Lisbon conclusions were reached after the original Directive was drawn up, and so should be taken into account in this Review.
(5) Soulad mezi prací a rodinným životem je základním prvkem pro dosažení cílů, jež si Unie stanovila v rámci Lisabonské strategie.
(5) Reconciliation between work and family life is an essential element to allow the Union to reach the objectives set in the Lisbon Strategy.
Tímto souladem se vytvoří pracovní prostředí, které zajistí nejenom větší uspokojení, ale také bude lépe přizpůsobeno potřebám pracovníků, zejména těch, kteří mají odpovědnost za rodinu.
It not only creates a more satisfactory working atmosphere, but also means workers' needs are taken into account more, particularly those with family responsibilities.
Některé změny směrnice 2003/88/ES, zejména pokud jde o článek 22, umožní docílit vyšší slučitelnosti mezi prací a rodinným životem.
Several of the modifications introduced by Directive 2003/88/EC, particularly in relation to Article 22, allow a better compatibility between work and family life.
(5) Soulad mezi prací a rodinným životem je základním prvkem pro dosažení cílů, jež si Unie stanovila v rámci Lisabonské strategie , zejména zvýšení míry zaměstnanosti žen .
(5) Reconciliation between work and family life is an essential element to allow the Union to reach the objectives set in the Lisbon Strategy , in particular to increase the rate of employment of women .
Některé změny směrnice 2003/88/ES usilují o umožnění docílit vyšší slučitelnosti mezi prací a rodinným životem.
Several of the modifications introduced by Directive 2003/88/EC seek to allow a better compatibility between work and family life.
(7) Objevila se potřeba nalézt novou rovnováhu mezi ochranou zdraví a bezpečností pracovníků a potřebou zajistit podnikům větší pružnost v úpravě pracovní doby , zejména co se týká pracovní pohotovosti a konkrétně doby nečinnosti v průběhu pracovní pohotovosti.
(7) It is necessary to strike a new balance between the protection of workers' health and safety and the need to give companies more flexibility in the organisation of working time , in particular with regards to on-call time and , more specifically, to inactive parts of on-call time .
(7) Objevila se potřeba posílit ochranu zdraví a bezpečnost pracovníků navzdory nárokům nových forem úpravy pracovní doby, zavést takové modely pracovní doby, které poskytují příležitosti k celoživotnímu vzdělávání zaměstnanců, a nalézt novou rovnováhu mezi uspokojením pracovních nároků a rodinného života na jedné straně a mezi pružnou úpravou pracovní doby na druhé straně.
(7) It is necessary to strengthen the protection of workers' health and safety despite the challenge of new forms of organisation of working time, to introduce working time models which provide opportunities for life-long learning for employees, and also to strike a new balance between the reconciliation of work and family life on the one hand, and more flexible organisation of working time on the other .
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 7A (nový)
RECITAL 7 A (new)
(7a) Charakteristickými znaky pojmu „pracovní doba“ jsou podle precedenčního práva Evropského soudního dvora požadavky být přítomen na místě určeném zaměstnavatelem a být tomuto zaměstnavateli k dispozici za účelem okamžitého poskytnutí svých služeb v případě potřeby.
(7a) According to the case-law of the European Court of Justice, the characteristic features of the concept of ‘working time’ are the requirements to be present at the place determined by the employer and available to the employer in order to be able to provide services immediately, when necessary.
The Court rightly argues that a worker who is required to keep himself available to the employer at the place determined by the latter for the whole duration of periods of on-call duty, is subject to appreciably greater constraints than a worker on stand-by since the worker has to remain apart from the family and social environment and has less freedom to manage the time during which the professional services are not required.
The Court rightly argues that a worker who is required to keep himself available to the employer at the place determined by the latter for the whole duration of periods of on-call duty, is subject to appreciably greater constraints than a worker on stand-by since the worker has to remain apart from the family and social environment and has less freedom to manage the time during which the professional services are not required.
Therefore, workers under those conditions cannot be regarded as being at rest during the periods of on-call duty when they are not actually carrying on any professional activity.
Therefore, workers under those conditions cannot be regarded as being at rest during the periods of on-call duty when they are not actually carrying on any professional activity.
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 8
RECITAL 8
(8) Ustanovení týkající se odchylek od referenčního období musejí být rovněž přepracována tak, aby se současný režim zjednodušil a přizpůsobil potřebám zaměstnavatelů a zaměstnanců.
(8) The provisions on the derogations to the reference period must also be re-examined, with the objective of simplifying existing arrangements in order to adapt them to the needs of employers and employees.
(8) Ustanovení týkající se odchylek od referenčního období musejí být rovněž přepracována tak, aby se vytvořily možnosti pro tvorbu nových modelů pracovní doby, které zahrnují režim celoživotního vzdělávání, a aby se současný režim zjednodušil a přizpůsobil potřebám zaměstnavatelů , zejména z malých a středně velkých podniků a zejména co se týká větší pružnosti, a potřebám zaměstnanců .
(8) The provisions on the derogations to the reference period must also be re-examined, with the objective of creating possibilities for new working time models, which include lifelong learning arrangements and of simplifying existing arrangements in order to adapt them to the needs of employers , particularly those of small and medium-sized undertakings and particularly as regards greater flexibility, and employees.
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 9
RECITAL 9
Toto ustanovení o výjimkách se tudíž musí přestat uplatňovat.
Therefore, the opt-out in that provision should cease to apply.
The opt-out provision should be abolished as soon as possible since it is in flagrant contradiction to the objectives and provisions of the Directive and with the fundamental principles of the protection of health and safety.
The opt-out provision should be abolished as soon as possible since it is in flagrant contradiction to the objectives and provisions of the Directive and with the fundamental principles of the protection of health and safety.
In addition, it is against the principles of the Treaty and contradicts all the evidence that indicates that working time without limits poses a serious risk to workers' health and safety, as well as to the reconciliation of family and professional life.
In addition, it is against the principles of the Treaty and contradicts all the evidence that indicates that working time without limits poses a serious risk to workers' health and safety, as well as to the reconciliation of family and professional life.
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 14
RECITAL 14
(14) Tato směrnice respektuje základní práva a dodržuje zásady uznané zejména Listinou základních práv Evropské unie.
(14) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles specifically recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Cílem této směrnice je zejména zajistit plné respektování práva na rovné a spravedlivé pracovní podmínky (článek 31 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie) .
In particular, it seeks to ensure full respect of the right to fair and equitable working conditions (Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union).
(14) Tato směrnice respektuje základní práva a dodržuje zásady uznané Listinou základních práv Evropské unie.
(14) This Directive respects fundamental rights and observes the principles specifically recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Cílem této směrnice je zejména zajistit plné respektování práva na rovné a spravedlivé pracovní podmínky (článek 31 Listiny základních práv Evropské unie , zejména odstavec 2 tohoto článku, který uvádí, že “každý pracovník má právo na omezení maximální délky pracovní doby, na denní a týdenní dobu odpočinku a na každoroční placenou dovolenou”) a práva sladit rodinný a profesionální život (článek 33 Listiny).
In particular, it seeks to ensure full respect of the right to fair and equitable working conditions (Article 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union , particularly paragraph 2 thereof, which states that every worker has the right to limitation of maximum working hours, to daily and weekly rest periods and to an annual period of paid leave ) and the right to reconcile family and professional life (Article 33 of that Charter) .
1a. “ pracovní pohotovostí “ období, ve kterém pracovník musí být k dispozici na pracovním místě a na žádost zaměstnavatele musí být připraven zasáhnout a vykonávat svou činnost nebo své povinnosti .
1a. “on-call time”: period during which the worker has the obligation to be available at the workplace in order to intervene, at the employer’s request, to carry out his activity or duties .
1a. “pracovní pohotovostí“ období, ve kterém pracovník nemůže volně nakládat se svým časem a musí být k dispozici na svém pracovním místě, popřípadě na jiném místě určeném zaměstnavatelem, aby mohl začít vykonávat svoji běžnou práci, resp. určité činnosti a úkoly spojené s jeho služební přítomností na pracovišti, a to v souladu s vnitrostátními právními předpisy, resp. zvyklostmi v dotyčném členském státě.
1a. “on-call time”: period during which the worker cannot dispose freely of his time and has the obligation to be available at his workplace or at another workplace determined by his employer in order to take up his habitual work and/or certain activities and tasks associated with being on duty, in accordance with national laws and/or practice in the Member State concerned .
1b. „dobou nečinnosti v průběhu pracovní pohotovosti“ období, ve kterém je pracovník v pracovní pohotovosti ve smyslu odstavce 1a, ale není svým zaměstnavatelem povolán, aby vykonával svou činnost nebo své povinnosti.
1b. “inactive part of on-call time “: period during which the worker is on call within the meaning of Article 1a, but not required by his employer to carry out his activity or duties .