natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o řidičských průkazech
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences
Dat um předložení Parlament u
Date submitted to Parliament
Předchozí zpravodaj)ové)
Previous rapporteur(s)
Konzultace s výborem regionů Datum rozhodnutí na zasedání
Committee of the Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary
Dat um přijetí
Date adopted
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Ashley Mote, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Ashley Mote, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Alessandro Battilocchio, Jelko Kacin, Francesco Musotto
Alessandro Battilocchio, Jelko Kacin, Francesco Musotto
Dat um předložení – A 6
Date tabled – A 6
ke společnému postoji Rady ohledně přijetí rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění rozhodnutí č. 1419/1999/ES o zavedení akce Společenství „Evropské město kultury“ na roky 2005 až 2019
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019
PE 350.219v02-00
PE 350.219v02-00
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (12029/1/2004 – C6‑0161/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (12029/1/2004 – C6‑0161/2004 ),
– s ohledem na své stanovisko při prvním čtení
– having regard to its position at first reading
Texty přijaté k návrhu Komise Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2003)0700 )
Texts Adopted, on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0700 )
– s ohledem na doporučení pro druhé čtení dané Výborem pro kulturu a vzdělávání ( A6‑0017/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0017/2005 ),
Draft decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019
Draft decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019
The 'European Capital of Culture' programme was inaugurated in 1985 by Melina Mercouri. then Greek Minister of Culture, in order to forge closer ties between the citizens of Europe.
The 'European Capital of Culture' programme was inaugurated in 1985 by Melina Mercouri. then Greek Minister of Culture, in order to forge closer ties between the citizens of Europe.
This programme seeks to highlight the enormous variety of European culture, without overlooking the common European dimension.
This programme seeks to highlight the enormous variety of European culture, without overlooking the common European dimension.
Experience has shown that the programme has a lasting positive impact on the development of culture and tourism in the cities so designated and also captures the imagination of citizens.
Experience has shown that the programme has a lasting positive impact on the development of culture and tourism in the cities so designated and also captures the imagination of citizens.
The draft decision amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC - the subject of this recommendation - seeks to complete the provisions governing the sequence of cities so designated and to establish a new system which reflects the present membership of the Union.
The draft decision amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC - the subject of this recommendation - seeks to complete the provisions governing the sequence of cities so designated and to establish a new system which reflects the present membership of the Union.
The decision needs to be amended following the accession in May 2004 of ten new Member States which have not so far been included in the programme already adopted which covers the period up to 2019.
The decision needs to be amended following the accession in May 2004 of ten new Member States which have not so far been included in the programme already adopted which covers the period up to 2019.
The existing sequence of Member States entitled to nominate candidate cities as a ‘Cultural Capital of Europe’ remains unchanged.
The existing sequence of Member States entitled to nominate candidate cities as a ‘Cultural Capital of Europe’ remains unchanged.
A new system is adopted under which two Member States may jointly nominate their candidate cities, beginning in 2009 with Austria and Lithuania; in this way two cultural capitals can be designated.
A new system is adopted under which two Member States may jointly nominate their candidate cities, beginning in 2009 with Austria and Lithuania; in this way two cultural capitals can be designated.
At the first reading of the codecision procedure on 22 April 2004 the European Parliament delivered its opinion on the Commission proposal for a decision amending Decision No1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019, based on Article 151 of the EC Treaty.
At the first reading of the codecision procedure on 22 April 2004 the European Parliament delivered its opinion on the Commission proposal for a decision amending Decision No1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019, based on Article 151 of the EC Treaty.
The report adopted by the European Parliament (rapporteur: Michel Rocard) contains a total of five amendments.
The report adopted by the European Parliament (rapporteur: Michel Rocard) contains a total of five amendments.
On 21 April 2004 the Committee of the Regions delivered its opinion.
On 21 April 2004 the Committee of the Regions delivered its opinion.
On 21 October 2004 the Council adopted a common position in accordance with Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty.
On 21 October 2004 the Council adopted a common position in accordance with Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty.
At first reading the European Parliament tabled a total of five amendments.
At first reading the European Parliament tabled a total of five amendments.
The Council adopted one European Parliament amendment without change, which was also adopted by the Commission.
The Council adopted one European Parliament amendment without change, which was also adopted by the Commission.
This was Amendment 1, tabled by the European Parliament and adopted unchanged by the Commission, seeking to ensure availability of adequate and appropriate EU financial resources for the designation of two European cultural capitals.
This was Amendment 1, tabled by the European Parliament and adopted unchanged by the Commission, seeking to ensure availability of adequate and appropriate EU financial resources for the designation of two European cultural capitals.
Amendments 2 to 5 tabled by the European Parliament at first reading calling for a far-reaching reform of the programme were not adopted.
Amendments 2 to 5 tabled by the European Parliament at first reading calling for a far-reaching reform of the programme were not adopted.
These sought in particular to improve the selection procedure for the designation of candidate cities as European cultural capitals and the provisions governing the tasks and the role of the selection panel.
These sought in particular to improve the selection procedure for the designation of candidate cities as European cultural capitals and the provisions governing the tasks and the role of the selection panel.
They also sought to create stronger competition between the candidate cities through the nomination, on a regular basis, of at least two candidate cities by each Member State involved and a transparent list of requirements for the cultural capital.
They also sought to create stronger competition between the candidate cities through the nomination, on a regular basis, of at least two candidate cities by each Member State involved and a transparent list of requirements for the cultural capital.
It was also proposed that a report should be produced evaluating the results of the previous year’s event, leading, where necessary, to a review of the decision.
It was also proposed that a report should be produced evaluating the results of the previous year’s event, leading, where necessary, to a review of the decision.
COMMENTS BY THE RAPPORTEUR
COMMENTS BY THE RAPPORTEUR
Your rapporteur supports the common position.
Your rapporteur supports the common position.
She welcomes in particular the decision to make available adequate and appropriate Community financial resources in order to ensure that the new Member States take part in the programme on terms of equality and to enable the ambitious targets of the programme to be realised.
She welcomes in particular the decision to make available adequate and appropriate Community financial resources in order to ensure that the new Member States take part in the programme on terms of equality and to enable the ambitious targets of the programme to be realised.
Your rapporteur also considers that the plans of those cities which have already been nominated in the list of cultural capitals should not be jeopardised.
Your rapporteur also considers that the plans of those cities which have already been nominated in the list of cultural capitals should not be jeopardised.
For instance, preparations in Austria and Germany should continue unhindered.
For instance, preparations in Austria and Germany should continue unhindered.
For the above reasons your rapporteur recommends that the Council common position be adopted without amendments .
For the above reasons your rapporteur recommends that the Council common position be adopted without amendments .
However, this does not mean that she is thinking of abandoning the urgently needed task of reforming Decision 1419/1999/EC.
However, this does not mean that she is thinking of abandoning the urgently needed task of reforming Decision 1419/1999/EC.
Instead, she calls on the Commission to submit a well-considered reform proposal to improve and adjust the existing programme in the first half of 2005 .
Instead, she calls on the Commission to submit a well-considered reform proposal to improve and adjust the existing programme in the first half of 2005 .
This proposal should contain the following improvements in particular:
This proposal should contain the following improvements in particular:
· The tasks of the selection panel should be spelt out and it should be given a greater role in selecting the candidate cities.
· The tasks of the selection panel should be spelt out and it should be given a greater role in selecting the candidate cities.
It is intended to achieve the original objectives of the programme by applying objective selection criteria: this is to be done through the nomination of one or more candidate cities by each Member State involved and thus the introduction of genuine competition.
It is intended to achieve the original objectives of the programme by applying objective selection criteria: this is to be done through the nomination of one or more candidate cities by each Member State involved and thus the introduction of genuine competition.
These criteria for the selection of a candidate city as European cultural capital should be made as specific as possible so that the selection can be as fair as possible, in accordance with the objectives of the programme.
These criteria for the selection of a candidate city as European cultural capital should be made as specific as possible so that the selection can be as fair as possible, in accordance with the objectives of the programme.
Where only one candidate city is nominated, the same selection criteria should be applied.
Where only one candidate city is nominated, the same selection criteria should be applied.
· The selection criteria should be set in such a way as to express European added value, so that the European dimension of the programme acquires greater prominence.
· The selection criteria should be set in such a way as to express European added value, so that the European dimension of the programme acquires greater prominence.
In this connection the rapporteur welcomes the fact that the new EU Commissioner responsible for culture, Jan Figel, confirmed at a meeting of the Committee on Culture and Education on 30 November 2004 that he would submit a new proposal for reform within the next six months establishing new procedures, including strict selection criteria.
In this connection the rapporteur welcomes the fact that the new EU Commissioner responsible for culture, Jan Figel, confirmed at a meeting of the Committee on Culture and Education on 30 November 2004 that he would submit a new proposal for reform within the next six months establishing new procedures, including strict selection criteria.
She also welcomes the fact that the budget for cultural capitals would be increased threefold in future.
She also welcomes the fact that the budget for cultural capitals would be increased threefold in future.
The Commission's proposal should also take into account further proposals for reform:
The Commission's proposal should also take into account further proposals for reform:
· The accession of further Member States to the European Union and their participation in this programme should be considered in good time, so that the relevant decision does not need to be subsequently corrected.
· The accession of further Member States to the European Union and their participation in this programme should be considered in good time, so that the relevant decision does not need to be subsequently corrected.
· In order to ensure adequate financial resources for two European cultural capitals, this aspect should be taken into account in the new cultural programme 2007-2013.
· In order to ensure adequate financial resources for two European cultural capitals, this aspect should be taken into account in the new cultural programme 2007-2013.
In addition, a specific financial framework for the financial endowment of cultural capitals should be submitted in the new programme.
In addition, a specific financial framework for the financial endowment of cultural capitals should be submitted in the new programme.
The 2007 programme provides in Point 1.3: Special actions (under Strand 1) for funding of 17% of the total budget, without making any precise provisions concerning the financial framework of the cultural capitals.
The 2007 programme provides in Point 1.3: Special actions (under Strand 1) for funding of 17% of the total budget, without making any precise provisions concerning the financial framework of the cultural capitals.
· An adequate budget should also be requested in the 2007-2013 financial perspective.
· An adequate budget should also be requested in the 2007-2013 financial perspective.
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění rozhodnutí č. 1419/1999/ES o zavedení akce Společenství „Evropské město kultury“ na roky 2005 až 2019
Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 1419/1999/EC establishing a Community action for the 'European Capital of Culture' event for the years 2005 to 2019
2 a článek 151 Smlouvy o ES
Articles 251(2) and 151 EC
Datum prvního čtení EP – P[5]
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P5
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Nina Škottová,
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Nina Škottová,
Datum předložení – A[5]
Date tabled – A6
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací v audiovizuální oblasti, kterou se stanoví náležitosti a podmínky pro účast Švýcarské konfederace v programech Společenství MEDIA Plus a MEDIA Vzdělávání, a o uzavření závěrečného aktu.
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the Community and the Swiss Confederation in the Audiovisual field, establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training Community programmes, and a final Act
PE 350.213v03-00
PE 350.213v03-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2004)0649 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0649 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro kulturu a vzdělávání ( A6‑0018/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0018/2005 ),
L'article 11 de la Décision du Conseil du 20 decembre 2000, établissant les termes et conditions pour la participation au programme communautaire MEDIA Plus, et l'Article 8 de la décision du Conseil et du Parlement européen sur la mise en oeuvre du Programme MEDIA Formation, prévoient la participation des pays faisant partie de la Convention sur la Télévision Transfrontalière du Conseil de l'Europe sur la base de crédits supplémentaires, conformément aux conditions à convenir dans des accords entre les parties concernées.
Article 11 of the Council Decision of 20 December 2000 establishing the terms and conditions for participation in the MEDIA Plus Community programme and Article 8 of the European Parliament and Council Decision on the implementation of the MEDIA programme provide for the participation of countries which are party to the Convention of the Council of Europe on Transfrontier Television on the basis of supplementary appropriations, subject to conditions to be established in agreements between the parties concerned.
En outre, l'ouverture de ces programmes à ces pays est aussi soumise à un examen de la compatibilité de leur législation nationale avec l'acquis communautaire.
In addition, the opening up of programmes to these countries is also subject to an examination of the compatibility of their legislation with the acquis communautaire.
Dans ce cadre, la Commission a négocié un accord entre la Communauté européenne et la Confédération suisse dans le domaine de l’audiovisuel, sur la base des directives adoptées par le Conseil le 17 juin 2002 et en consultation avec le comité compétent désigné par le Conseil.
In this connection, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement between the Community and the Swiss Confederation in the audiovisual field, on the basis of the Directives adopted by the Council on 17 June 2002 and in consultation with the relevant committee appointed by the Council.
Le Parlement est consulté sur la proposition de décision du Conseil relatif à l'accord négocié par la Commission.
Parliament is now being consulted on the proposal for a Council decision on the agreement negotiated by the Commission.
Au sein du Parlement, la commission de la culture et de l'éducation a décidé de donner son avis suivant l'Art 43 du règlement du Parlement européen.
Within Parliament, the Committee on Culture and Education decided to deliver its opinion pursuant to Rule 43 of the Rules of Procedure of the Euroepan Parliament.
La contribution financière de la Suisse au budget de l'UE pour participer aux programmes MEDIA Plus et MEDIA Formation est de 4,2 millions d'euros pour 2005 et de 4,2 millions d'euros pour 2006.
Switzerland’s contribution to the EU Budget for participating in the MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training programmes totals EUR 4.2 million for 2005 and EUR 4.2 million for 2006.
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací v audiovizuální oblasti, kterou se stanoví náležitosti a podmínky pro účast Švýcarské konfederace v programech Společenství MEDIA Plus a MEDIA Vzdělávání, a o uzavření závěrečného aktu
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the Community and the Swiss Confederation in the Audiovisual field, establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the MEDIA Plus and MEDIA Training Community programmes, and a final Act
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dickute, V?ra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Mario Mauro, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Mario Mauro, Jaroslav Zvěřina
o návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (ES) č. 1035/2001, kterým se zavádí systém dokumentace úlovků ledovek
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1035/2001 establishing a catch documentation scheme for Dissostichus spp.
PE 347.076v02-00
PE 347.076v02-00
o návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení (ES) č. 1035/2001, kterým se zavádí systém dokumentace úlovků ledovek (zkontrolovat)
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1035/2001 establishing a catch documentation scheme for Dissostichus spp.
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Radě ( KOM(2004)0528 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0528 )
– s ohledem na článek 37 Smlouvy o ES, podle kterého Rada konzultovala s Parlamentem ( C6‑0114/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0114/2004 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro rybolov ( A6‑0019/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0019/2005 ),