natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mercedes Bresso, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Mia De Vits, Bert Doorn, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Alexander Lambsdorff, Lasse Lehtinen, Arlene McCarthy, Toine Manders, Manuel Medina Ortega, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Eva-Britt Svensson, József Szájer, Marianne Thyssen, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Phillip Whitehead
Mercedes Bresso, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Mia De Vits, Bert Doorn, Janelly Fourtou, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Anna Hedh, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Alexander Lambsdorff, Lasse Lehtinen, Arlene McCarthy, Toine Manders, Manuel Medina Ortega, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Eva-Britt Svensson, József Szájer, Marianne Thyssen, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Phillip Whitehead
Výbor pro dopravu a cestovní ruch vyzývá Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. konstatuje, že ačkoliv byly položky plateb využívány ve vysoké míře, objem nevyřízených závazků nebo RAL (neproplacených závazků) se nesnížil, a v průběhu roku 2003 se mírně zvýšil na 1,154 milionů eur na TEN–T;
Notes that despite this high rate of payment appropriation utilisation the volume of outstanding commitments or RAL (reste à liquider) was not reduced and rose slightly to 1,154 million Euro for TEN-T in the course of 2003;
6. navrhuje, aby Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu udělil absolutorium na finanční rok 2003 těm odvětvím, za které zodpovídá Výbor pro dopravu a cestovní ruch.
Proposes that the Committee on Budgetary Control grant the discharge for the financial year 2003 for those sectors for which the Committee on Transport and Tourism is responsible.
K udělení absolutoria za plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2003
The discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003 : Section III - Commission
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Výbor pro regionální rozvoj vyzývá Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. poukazuje na to, že Účetní dvůr v rámci vnitřních kontrolních mechanizmů Komise neshledal vinu a zaznamenal zlepšení; vyjadřuje politování nad skutečností, že kvůli nedostatku zdrojů byl předmětem namátkové kontroly pouze omezený počet systémů členských států;
Notes that the Court of Auditors did not find fault with the internal control mechanisms of the Commission and noted improvements; regrets the fact that, due to insufficient resources, only a limited number of Member States’ systems have been subjected to on the spot checks;
Udělení absolutoria za plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie za rozpočtový rok 2003, Oddíl III - Komise
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Výbor pro kulturu a vzdělávání vyzývá Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. zdůrazňuje své přesvědčení, že hlavní zásadou administrativních a účetních požadavků příští generace programů Lifelong Learning (celoživotní vzdělávání) a Youth musí být proporcionalita; zdůrazňuje výhody cílených odchylek od prováděcích pravidel finančního nařízení, které umožní:
Underlines its conviction that the guiding principle of administrative and accounting requirements in the next generation of Lifelong Learning and Youth programmes should be proportionality; underlines the advantages of targeted derogations from the Implementing Rules for the Financial Regulation allowing:
· jednodušší dokumentaci o finanční a provozní kapacitě příjemců;
· simpler documentation on the financial and operational capacity of beneficiaries;
BACKGROUND NOTE
BACKGROUND NOTE
Under Article 276 of the Treaty, implementation of the Community budget is approved retrospectively by the Parliament - acting on a recommendation of the Council - through the discharge procedure .
Under Article 276 of the Treaty, implementation of the Community budget is approved retrospectively by the Parliament - acting on a recommendation of the Council - through the discharge procedure .
In the words of one authority: 'Granting discharge is a formal statement that Parliament is satisfied with the implementation of the budget by the Commission.
In the words of one authority: 'Granting discharge is a formal statement that Parliament is satisfied with the implementation of the budget by the Commission.
It is the political endorsement of the Commission's stewardship of the Union's budget.'
It is the political endorsement of the Commission's stewardship of the Union's budget.'
The basis for the discharge procedure is the annual report by the Court of Auditors, published in the November of the year following the budgetary year to which it refers.
The basis for the discharge procedure is the annual report by the Court of Auditors, published in the November of the year following the budgetary year to which it refers.
The observations in the Court's report arise from its audit of revenue and expenditure, following the submission of audited accounts by each of the European institutions .
The observations in the Court's report arise from its audit of revenue and expenditure, following the submission of audited accounts by each of the European institutions .
Each report contains a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the general budget.
Each report contains a Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying the general budget.
The annual report also takes into account the special reports on particular areas which the Court has adopted since the last discharge procedure; and comments on the adequacy of action taken in response to earlier reports.
The annual report also takes into account the special reports on particular areas which the Court has adopted since the last discharge procedure; and comments on the adequacy of action taken in response to earlier reports.
Special report no.2/2002 focussed on the management system operated by DG EAC for the 'Socrates' and 'Youth for Europe' (1995-1999) programmes.
Special report no.2/2002 focussed on the management system operated by DG EAC for the 'Socrates' and 'Youth for Europe' (1995-1999) programmes.
It identified:
It identified:
· weaknesses in the design of the programmes and their management systems;
· weaknesses in the design of the programmes and their management systems;
· deficiencies in the implementation of the actions and projects covered by both programmes, including delays due to complex administrative and financial procedures;
· deficiencies in the implementation of the actions and projects covered by both programmes, including delays due to complex administrative and financial procedures;
· inadequacies in the Commission's internal control system;
· inadequacies in the Commission's internal control system;
· shortcomings in the Commission's programme evaluation.
· shortcomings in the Commission's programme evaluation.
The Court's audit observations were explicitly supported in the Parliament's report on the discharge for the general budget for the 2001 financial year.
The Court's audit observations were explicitly supported in the Parliament's report on the discharge for the general budget for the 2001 financial year.
In its follow-up of special report no.2/2002, the Court concludes (paras.
In its follow-up of special report no.2/2002, the Court concludes (paras.
6.46-6.59, pp.246-250, of the annual report for 2003) that the Commission has addressed a number of deficiencies identified by the Court in the Special Report.
6.46-6.59, pp.246-250, of the annual report for 2003) that the Commission has addressed a number of deficiencies identified by the Court in the Special Report.
Further, it notes that, in some areas, such as the programme design and its management structure, the Commission has had only limited room for manoeuvre since the legal bases for the current generation of programmes (2000-2006) were adopted before the Court drew up its report.
Further, it notes that, in some areas, such as the programme design and its management structure, the Commission has had only limited room for manoeuvre since the legal bases for the current generation of programmes (2000-2006) were adopted before the Court drew up its report.
In other areas, however, the follow-up of the special report revealed continuing shortcomings.
In other areas, however, the follow-up of the special report revealed continuing shortcomings.
The Court argues that the Commission needs to:
The Court argues that the Commission needs to:
· simplify programme design and management structure in future 'Socrates' or 'Youth' programmes;
· simplify programme design and management structure in future 'Socrates' or 'Youth' programmes;
· develop relevant and measurable indicators;
· develop relevant and measurable indicators;
· simplify administrative procedures e.g. use an electronic system for the submission and processing of proposals by National Agencies;
· simplify administrative procedures e.g. use an electronic system for the submission and processing of proposals by National Agencies;
· give National Agencies better guidance on the audit work necessary for the audit certificates they are required to submit, and a strategy to check that these certificates meet the minimum standards set;
· give National Agencies better guidance on the audit work necessary for the audit certificates they are required to submit, and a strategy to check that these certificates meet the minimum standards set;
· provide for evaluations on relevant administrative issues, in particular on attempts to simplify administrative and financial aspects of the programmes, and to communicate the results of these evaluations to the Parliament, Council and National Agencies so that their findings may be taken into account when successor programmes are being designed.
· provide for evaluations on relevant administrative issues, in particular on attempts to simplify administrative and financial aspects of the programmes, and to communicate the results of these evaluations to the Parliament, Council and National Agencies so that their findings may be taken into account when successor programmes are being designed.
The Commission's replies to the comments of the Court are provided on pages 267-268 of the Court's report.
The Commission's replies to the comments of the Court are provided on pages 267-268 of the Court's report.
The key points are:
The key points are:
· the architecture proposed for the next generation of programmes (2007-2013) is simpler than that of the current generation, which in its turn is simpler than that of the programmes which ran from 1995-1999;
· the architecture proposed for the next generation of programmes (2007-2013) is simpler than that of the current generation, which in its turn is simpler than that of the programmes which ran from 1995-1999;
· it is continuing to develop measurable indicators;
· it is continuing to develop measurable indicators;
· it will continue to simplify the management of actions (e.g. greater use of flat-rate grants);
· it will continue to simplify the management of actions (e.g. greater use of flat-rate grants);
· it has already provided better guidance on audit certification to the National Agencies and stepped-up its auditing of them (e.g. it did not initially accept most of the audit certificates provided in respect of 2003);
· it has already provided better guidance on audit certification to the National Agencies and stepped-up its auditing of them (e.g. it did not initially accept most of the audit certificates provided in respect of 2003);
· it has stepped-up efforts with regard to programme evaluation and will provide final evaluations assessing effectiveness (implementation and results) and efficiency (administrative and financial aspects).
· it has stepped-up efforts with regard to programme evaluation and will provide final evaluations assessing effectiveness (implementation and results) and efficiency (administrative and financial aspects).
By and large, the draftswoman believes that the Commission has given convincing answers to the points made by the Court.
By and large, the draftswoman believes that the Commission has given convincing answers to the points made by the Court.
She believes that the Parliament should :
She believes that the Parliament should :
· welcome the fact that, as evidenced by its proposals for the next generation of Lifelong Learning and Youth programmes, the Commission has learned from the programme design and management weaknesses which marred the first generation of Socrates and Youth programmes;
· welcome the fact that, as evidenced by its proposals for the next generation of Lifelong Learning and Youth programmes, the Commission has learned from the programme design and management weaknesses which marred the first generation of Socrates and Youth programmes;
· note that the Commission faces a difficult task in trying to reconcile demands that the programmes be as user-friendly and un-bureaucratic as possible with the requirements imposed on it by the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation for the sound management of public money;
· note that the Commission faces a difficult task in trying to reconcile demands that the programmes be as user-friendly and un-bureaucratic as possible with the requirements imposed on it by the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation for the sound management of public money;
· underline its conviction that the guiding principle of grant administration should be proportionality and call for: greater use of flat-rate grants; greater acknowledgement of co-financing through contributions in kind and less onerous accounting obligations on beneficiaries in such cases; simpler documentation on the financial and operational capacity of beneficiaries;
· underline its conviction that the guiding principle of grant administration should be proportionality and call for: greater use of flat-rate grants; greater acknowledgement of co-financing through contributions in kind and less onerous accounting obligations on beneficiaries in such cases; simpler documentation on the financial and operational capacity of beneficiaries;
· emphasise the importance it attaches to punctual publication of interim and ex post evaluation reports.
· emphasise the importance it attaches to punctual publication of interim and ex post evaluation reports.
Udělení absolutoria za plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2003, Oddíl III - Komise
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Mario Mauro, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal, Jaroslav Zvěřina
María Badía i Cutchet, Christopher Beazley, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Vasco Graça Moura, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Luis Francisco Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Mario Mauro, Manolis Mavrommatis, Doris Pack, Miguel Portas, Christa Prets, Karin Resetarits, Pál Schmitt, Nikolaos Sifunakis, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Nina Škottová
Ivo Belet, Mary Honeyball, Nina Škottová
Výbor pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci vyzývá Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. vyjadřuje znepokojení nad tím, že Komise dosud nezaujala stanovisko k návrhu finančního nařízení Eurojust, jež požaduje rozhodnutí o Eurojustu, přestože Eurojust jej zaslal Komisi v listopadu 2003.
Expresses its concern that the Commission has not yet given its opinion on the draft financial regulation of Eurojust, as required by the Eurojust decision, although it was sent to the Commission by Eurojust in November 2003.
Udělení absolutoria za plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2003: Oddíl III - Komise
Discharge for implementing the European Union general budget for the financial year 2003: Section III - Commission
Frederika Brepoels, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Camiel Eurlings, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in 't Veld, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Vincent Peillon, Herbert Reul, Marie-Line Reynaud, Jan Zahradil
Frederika Brepoels, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Camiel Eurlings, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in 't Veld, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Vincent Peillon, Herbert Reul, Marie-Line Reynaud, Jan Zahradil
Výbor pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví výbor vyzývá Výbor pro rozpočtovou kontrolu jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. vzhledem k tomu, že v souvislosti se vstupem nových členských států do EU Komise svým rozhodnutím ze dne 27. února 2002 týkajícím se politické roční strategie stanovila jako svou hlavní prioritu v rámci stanovení rozpočtu na rok 2003 rozšířenou Evropu a jako priority úzce spojené bezpečnost, stabilitu a udržitelné a solidární hospodářství,
A. whereas, with a view to the accession of the new Member States to the EU, the Commission, in its decision of 27 February 2002 regarding the Annual Policy Strategy, decided that the enlarged Europe should be a top priority in the drawing up of the 2003 budget, with security, stability and a sustainable and inclusive economy as closely associated priorities,
4. vychází ze zásady, že využití rozpočtových prostředků má různý dopad na ženy a na muže z důvodu přetrvávající nerovnosti pohlaví; poukazuje na to, že údaje o rozpočtu za rozpočtový rok 2003 neposkytují žádné informace o rozsahu a účincích finančních prostředků vyčleněných na akce na podporu rovnosti pohlaví v rámci „gender mainstreaming“ a žádá Komisi, aby Parlamentu příslušné informace bez otálení poskytla.
Takes the view that the utilisation of budgetary resources has different effects on women and men because of persistent gender disparities; points out that budgetary data for 2003 give hardly any information on the extent and impact of funding allocated to the promotion of gender equality in the context of gender mainstreaming, and calls on the Commission to present the relevant information to Parliament without delay.
Udělení absolutoria za plnění souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie za rozpočtový rok 2003
Discharge in respect of implementation of the EU general budget for financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
Výbor(y) požádaný(é) o stanovisko Datum oznámení na zasedání
Committee asked for its opinion Date announced in plenary
Anna Záborská 25.
Anna Záborská 25.11.2004
Datum přijetí pozměňovacích návrhů
Proposal for a European Parliament Decision closing the accounts in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section III - Commission
o rozpočtu na rok 2006: zpráva Komise o roční politické strategii (APS)
on the 2006 budget: the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS)
PE 355.365v03-00
PE 355.365v03-00
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO ROZVOJ ...............................................................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Development .......................................................10
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO MEZINÁRODNÍ OBCHOD .................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................15
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO ZEMĚDĚLSTVÍ A ROZVOJ VENKOVA ............................17
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ....17
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO RYBOLOV ...........................................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................22
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise Evropskému parlamentu a Radě – roční politická strategie na rok 2006 ( KOM(2005)0073 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Annual Policy Strategy for 2006 ( COM(2005)0073 ),
C 172, 18.6.1999, s. 1, Dohoda ve znění rozhodnutí 2003/429/ES (Úř. věst.
1, Agreement as amended by Decision 2003/429/EC (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p.
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru a stanoviska ostatních výborů, které byly požádány o stanovisko ( A6‑0071/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees asked for an opinion( A6-0071/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že rozpočet na rok 2006 bude posledním v rámci současného finančního výhledu a představuje spolu s probíhajícími jednáními o novém finančním výhledu na období 2007–2013 strategický rámec, v němž bude Parlament rozhodovat o svých prioritách, aby bylo možné podpořit cíle Unie dostatečnou úrovní rozpočtových zdrojů;
A. whereas the 2006 budget will be the last of the current financial perspective and constitutes, with the ongoing negotiations for a new financial perspective for 2007/2013, the strategic framework in which the Parliament will decide its priorities so that the Union's objectives can be backed up by a proper level of budgetary resources;