natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. vzhledem k tomu, že Rada a Komise musí plně zapojit Evropský parlament do kontroly procesu přistoupení Bulharské republiky a do rozhodování v případech, kdy by v rámci přistoupení Bulharské republiky měly být uplatněny ochranné doložky, jež jsou obsaženy ve Smlouvě o přistoupení,
B. whereas the Council and the Commission must fully involve the European Parliament in the follow-up to the process of accession of the Republic of Bulgaria, and in decision-making should the safeguard clauses contained in the accession treaty be activated in connection with the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria,
C. jelikož tomuto souhlasu předcházela společná dohoda obou složek rozpočtového orgánu o celkovém finančním ujednání, jež má být zahrnuto do smlouvy o přistoupení, a schválení prohlášení o rozpočtových a institucionálních důsledcích tohoto ujednání,
C. whereas this assent has been preceded by a joint agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the financial package to be included in the accession treaty and the adoption of a declaration on the budgetary and institutional consequences thereof,
Žádost Bulharské republiky o členství v Evropské unii
Application by the Republic of Bulgaria to become a member of the European Union
49 Smlouvy o EU
Article 49 EU
Datum, kdy byl EP požádán o souhlas
Date of request for Parliament's assent
AFET 11.4.2005
AFET 11.4..2005
Geoffrey Van Orden 18.1.2005
Geoffrey Van Orden 18.1.2005
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Maciej Marian Giertych, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Bogdan Klich, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Marek Maciej Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Maciej Marian Giertych, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Bogdan Klich, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Marek Maciej Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Christofer Fjellner, Bronisław Geremek
Christofer Fjellner, Bronisław Geremek
k žádosti Rumunska o členství v Evropské unii
on the application by Romania to become a member of the European Union
PE 353.658v02-00
PE 353.658v02-00
o žádosti Rumunska o členství v Evropské unii
on the application by Romania to become a member of the European Union
– s ohledem na žádost Rumunska o členství v Evropské unii,
– having regard to the application by Romania to become a member of the European Union,
– s ohledem na žádost o souhlas, kterou předložila Rada v souladu s článkem 49 Smlouvy o EU ( C6‑0086/2005 ),
– having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 49 of the EU Treaty ( C6‑0086/2005 ),
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro zahraniční věci ( A6‑0083/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0083/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že podmínky přijetí kandidátských zemí a technické adaptace spojené s jejich přistoupením jsou stanoveny ve smlouvě o přistoupení a že s Parlamentem musí být konzultovány jakékoli podstatné změny této smlouvy,
A. whereas the conditions for the admission of the applicant countries and the modifications which their accession entails are set out in the accession treaty and whereas Parliament should be consulted on any substantial modifications to this treaty,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že Rada a Komise musejí plně zapojit Evropský parlament do sledování procesu přistoupení Rumunska a do rozhodování, zda v případě potřeby uplatnit při přistoupení Rumunska ochranné doložky obsažené ve smlouvě o přistoupení,
B. whereas the Council and the Commission must fully involve the European Parliament in the follow-up to the process of accession of Romania, and in decision-making should the safeguard clauses contained in the accession treaty be activated in connection with the accession of Romania,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že tomuto souhlasu předcházela vzájemná dohoda obou rozpočtových orgánů o souboru finančních opatření, která mají být zahrnuta do přístupové smlouvy, a přijetí prohlášení o rozpočtových a institucionálních důsledcích této smlouvy,
C. whereas this assent has been preceded by a joint agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the financial package to be included in the accession treaty and the adoption of a declaration on the budgetary and institutional consequences thereof,
Žádost Rumunska o členství v Evropské unii
Application by Romania to become a member of the European Union
článek 49 Smlouvy o EU
Article 49 EC
Datum žádosti o souhlas EP
Date of request for Parliament's assent
AFET 11.4.2005
AFET 11.4.2005
Návrh(y) usnesení obsažený(é) ve zprávě
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in the report
Pierre Moscovici 18.1.2005
Pierre Moscovici 18.1.2005
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Ryszard Czarnecki, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Maciej Marian Giertych, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Richard Seeber, Marek Maciej Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Bastiaan Belder, Monika Beňová, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Simon Coveney, Ryszard Czarnecki, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Maciej Marian Giertych, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Richard Seeber, Marek Maciej Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Ari Vatanen, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
ke společnému postoji Rady ohledně přijetí nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění ustanovení Úmluvy k provedení Schengenské dohody ze dne 14. června 1985 o postupném odstraňování kontrol na společných hranicích v souvislosti s přístupem úřadů členských států odpovědných za vydávání osvědčení o registraci vozidel do Schengenského informačního systému
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders as regards access to the Schengen Information System by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing registration certificates for vehicles
PE 355.451v03-00
PE 355.451v03-00
Vysvětlující prohlášení ................................................................................................8
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................8
o společném postoji Rady ohledně přijetí nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění ustanovení Úmluvy k provedení Schengenské dohody ze dne 14. června 1985 o postupném odstraňování kontrol na společných hranicích v souvislosti s přístupem úřadů členských států odpovědných za vydávání osvědčení o registraci vozidel do Schengenského informačního systému
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 on the gradual abolition of checks at common borders as regards access to the Schengen Information System by the services in the Member States responsible for issuing registration certificates for vehicles
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (14238/1/2004 – C6‑0007/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (14238/1/2004 – C6‑0007/2005 ),
Texty přijaté 1.4.2004, P5_TA(2004)0266 . k návrhu Komise předloženému Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2003)0510 )
Texts Adopted, 1.4.2004, P5_TA(2004)0266 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0510 )
– s ohledem na doporučení pro druhé čtení dané Výborem pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci ( A6‑0084/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0084/2005 ),
(3) Podnět Nizozemského království k přijetí rozhodnutí Rady o boji s trestnou činností s přeshraničním dopadem týkající se vozidel 1 zahrnuje používání SIS jako nedílné součásti strategie vynucování práva u tohoto typu trestné činnosti.
(3) The initiative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands with a view to adopting a Council Decision on tackling vehicle crime with cross-border implications 1 includes the use of the SIS as an integral part of the law enforcement strategy against vehicle crime.
1 Úř. věst.
1 OJ C 34, 7.2.2004, p.
1 Úř. věst.
1 OJ L 389, 30.12.2004, p.
Since the initiative was in the meantime adopted, the text of the recital needs to be adjusted.
Since the initiative now been adopted, the text of the recital needs to be adjusted.
Bod odůvodnění (13a) (nový)
RECITAL 13 A (new)
1 Dokument Rady 13054/04 je přístupný na http://register.consilium.eu.int.
1 Council document 13054/04 is accessible at http://register.consilium.eu.int.
2 Úř. věst.
2 OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p.
3 Úř. věst.
3 OJ L 370, 17.12.2004, p.
Since the Agreement with Switzerland was signed on 26 October, any legislative act that constitutes a development of the Schengen Acquis for the purposes of the Agreement should be identified as such using a recital.
Since the Agreement with Switzerland was signed on 26 October, any legislative act that constitutes a development of the Schengen Acquis as regards the purposes served by the Agreement should be identified as such in a separate recital.
This Regulation is a development of the Schengen Acquis and so requires a recital concerning Switzerland.
Since this Regulation is a development of the Schengen Acquis, it requires a recital concerning Switzerland.
Rada poté, co požádá o stanovisko společný kontrolní úřad zřízený podle článku 115 o pravidlech na ochranu údajů, každoročně předloží Evropskému parlamentu zprávu o uplatňování tohoto článku.
Each year, after seeking the opinion of the joint supervisory authority set up pursuant to Article 115 on the data protection rules, the Council shall submit a report to the European Parliament on the implementation of this Article.
Tato zpráva bude zahrnovat informace a statistické údaje týkající se využívání a výsledků uplatňování tohoto článku a bude uvádět, jak byla uplatněna pravidla na ochranu údajů.
This report shall include information and statistics relating to the use and results of the implementation of this Article and shall state how the data protection rules were applied.
To receive a report about the implementation of this Article is very important for Parliament.
To receive a report about the implementation of this Article is very important for Parliament.
The original amendment 10, which was not included by Council in its common position, is therefore tabled again.
The original amendment 10, which was not included by Council in its common position, is therefore tabled again.
It is, however, modified in two aspects: First, because the Commission has no responsibility for the management of SIS 1+, it is proposed that the Council itself sends this report.
It is, however, modified in two aspects: first, because the Commission has no responsibility for the management of SIS 1+, it is proposed that the Council itself sends this report.
Second, to avoid that Member States have to make technical changes, the number of searches and the number of stolen vehicles is replaced by the more general words "information and statistics on the use and results of the implementation of this Article".
Second, to save the Member States the job of making technical changes, the number of searches and the number of stolen vehicles is replaced by the more general words "information and statistics relating to the use and results of the implementation of this Article".
Vysvětlující prohlášení
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
To tackle the problem of the high number of stolen vehicles
In view of increase in the number of vehicles which are being stolen and illegally traded
Statistics provided by Europol reveal that in 2002 1.149.114 vehicles were stolen of which only 388.779 could be recovered. a series of measures should urgently be undertaken.
Statistics provided by Europol reveal that in 2002 1.149.114 vehicles were stolen of which only 388.779 could be recovered. , further action to combat crime of this nature must be taken as a matter of urgency.
In a Europe without internal borders controls many of those need to be taken at European level.
In a Europe within which checks at internal borders have been abolished, a response must be found which involves clear action at Community level.
One measure discussed in this context is the access to the Schengen Information System (SIS) for vehicle registration authorities.
One course of action discussed in this context is the access to the Schengen Information System (SIS) for vehicle registration authorities.
Following the request of Council and intensive debates the Commission in 2003 made such a proposal to give public vehicle registration authorities direct access to some data in the SIS (COM(2003)510).
Following the request of Council and intensive debates the Commission in 2003 made such a proposal to give public vehicle registration authorities direct access to some data in the SIS (COM(2003)510).
This should allow them to better check whether vehicles presented to them for registration have been stolen.
This should allow them to better check whether vehicles presented to them for registration have been stolen.
Should a vehicle registration authority be a private entity then the access should be indirect, i.e. an access via a public authority.
Should a vehicle registration authority be a private entity then the access should be indirect, i.e. an access via a public authority.
On 1st April 2004 the European Parliament adopted its first reading (T5-0266/2004)
On 1st April 2004 the European Parliament adopted its first reading (T5-0266/2004)
Not yet published in OJ. based on the rapporteur's previous report ( A5-0205/2004 ).
Not yet published in OJ. based on the rapporteur's previous report ( A5-0205/2004 ).
In its first reading Parliament, on the one hand limited the data vehicle registration authorities should have access to by deleting the access to blank official documents and data concerning issued identity papers.
At its first reading, Parliament on the one hand limited the data to which vehicle registration authorities should have access by withdrawing access to data relating to blank official documents and to data concerning issued identity papers.
On the other hand, Parliament suggested to include in the SIS, and subsequently to give access to it for vehicle registration authorities, data concerning vehicle registration certificates and vehicle number plates which have been stolen, misappropriated or lost.
On the other hand, Parliament suggested including in the SIS (and subsequently giving vehicle registration authorities access to) data concerning vehicle registration certificates and vehicle number plates which have been stolen, misappropriated or lost.
In addition, it emphasised that that the bodies entitled to have access and the purpose should be more precisely defined.
In addition, it emphasised that clearer information should be given as to which bodies are entitled to have access, and for what purpose.
Furthermore, Parliament requested a yearly report on the implementation of this measure.
Furthermore, Parliament requested a yearly report on the implementation of this measure.
Finally, to underline that increased access should only be possible with strengthened data protection rules it introduced the requirement to record every transmission.
Finally, to underline that increased access should only be possible with strengthened data protection rules it introduced the requirement to record every transmission.
Council's common position
Council's common position
On 22 December 2004 Council adopted its common position (14238/1/04) accompanied with the statement of the Council's reasons (14238/1/04 REV 1 ADD 1).
On 22 December 2004 Council adopted its common position (14238/1/04) accompanied by the statement of the Council's reasons (14238/1/04 REV 1 ADD 1).
Pursuant to Article 251.2 TEC the European Commission informed that it supports the common position (COM(2005)3).
Pursuant to Article 251.2 TEC the European Commission informed that it supports the common position (COM(2005)3).
The Council essentially followed the first reading of the European Parliament.
The Council essentially followed Parliament's first reading.
It accepted to modify the data vehicle registration authorities should have access to as outlined above.
It agreed to modify the data to which vehicle registration authorities should have access, as outlined above.
Overall, Council accepted 7 out of 10 amendments from Parliament.
Overall, Council accepted 7 out of 10 amendments from Parliament.
Recommendation of the rapporteur
Recommendation of the rapporteur
The rapporteur welcomes the common position of Council and is satisfied that Council followed Parliaments first reading to such a large extent.
The rapporteur welcomes the common position of Council and is pleased that the Council followed Parliament's first reading to such a large extent.
He is confident that the legal act can soon be finally adopted to allow this useful measure to come into force.
He is confident that the legal act can soon be finally adopted, in order to allow this useful measure to come into force.
For a general appreciation of the Commission's proposal the rapporteur refers to his report A5-0205/2004 .
For a general appreciation of the Commission's proposal the rapporteur refers to his report A5-0205/2004 .
Since most of Parliament's amendments were accepted by Council there are very few outstanding issues for the second reading:
Since most of Parliament's amendments were accepted by Council there are very few outstanding issues for the second reading.
As regards the amendment number 4 as contained in the report A5-0205/2004 and adopted by Parliament, which was not included by Council, the rapporteur does not maintain it since on 24 February 2005 the Council adopted finally the initiative by the Kingdom of Spain with a view to adopting a Council Decision concerning the introduction of some new functions for the Schengen Information System, in particular in the fight against terrorism.
As regards Amendment 4 as contained in the report A5-0205/2004 and adopted by Parliament, which was not included by Council, the rapporteur has dropped it, since on 24 February 2005 the Council finally adopted the initiative by the Kingdom of Spain with a view to adopting a Council Decision concerning the introduction of some new functions for the Schengen Information System, in particular in the fight against terrorism.
This decision provides for a change of Article 100 f) of the Schengen Implementing Convention by including data on "vehicle registration certificates and vehicle number plates which have been stolen, misappropriated, lost or invalidated;".
This decision provides for a change to Article 100 f) of the Schengen Implementing Convention by including data on "vehicle registration certificates and vehicle number plates which have been stolen, misappropriated, lost or invalidated;".
This change covers the original amendment number 4.
This change covers the original Amendment 4.
As regards the amendment number 11 as contained in the report A5-0205/2004 and adopted by Parliament, which was not included by Council, the rapporteur does also not maintain it because its paragraphs 1 and 3 are also contained in the Decision mentioned above.
As regards Amendment 11 as contained in the report A5-0205/2004 and adopted by Parliament, which was not included by Council, the rapporteur has dropped it too, since its paragraphs 1 and 3 are also contained in the Decision mentioned above.
Paragraph 2 of the amendment 11 is, however, not included.
Paragraph 2 of the amendment 11 is, however, not included.
This paragraph proposed to record the person or object on whom the search in the SIS was run, the terminal or user carrying out the search, the place, date and time of the search and the reasons for the search.
This paragraph proposed recording the person or object on whom the search in the SIS was run, the terminal or user carrying out the search, the place, date and time of the search and the reasons for the search.
It was an attempt to change the data protection rules for the SIS in general and the rapporteur can accept that it was, for the moment, not included in the revised text of the Schengen Implementing Convention.
It was an attempt to change the data-protection rules for the SIS in general and the rapporteur can accept that it was, for the moment, not included in the revised text of the Schengen Implementing Convention.
Since the proposal for the SIS II is upcoming this issue can be dealt with in the context of this legal instrument.
Since the proposal for the SIS II is forthcoming, this issue can be dealt with in the context of this legal instrument.
The rapporteur does, however, insist on amendment number 10.
The rapporteur does, however, insist on Amendment 10.
This amendment requests an annual report about the implementation of the proposed access to vehicle registration authorities to combat vehicle crime.
This amendment requests an annual report about the implementation of the proposed access to vehicle registration authorities to combat vehicle crime.
In this report the Commission shall also "state how many searches were made, how many stolen vehicles were detected and how the data protection rules were applied".
In this report the Commission shall also "state how many searches were made, how many stolen vehicles were detected and how the data protection rules were applied".