natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All the administrative formats and applications needed for identification should be streamlined for all the Member States.
All the administrative formats and applications needed for identification should be streamlined for all the Member States.
OSS scheme should include rules on storage of documents and record keeping
OSS scheme should include rules on storage of documents and record keeping
In the current proposal, the trader might be confined to store documents in the Member State of supply, even if the VAT return could be filed in the Member State of establishment.
In the current proposal, the trader might be confined to store documents in the Member State of supply, even if the VAT return could be filed in the Member State of establishment.
Costs of payments, and especially the exchange rate conversion costs (if any), should not be born entirely by a taxable person, especially if we are talking of the SMEs.
Costs of payments, and especially the exchange rate conversion costs (if any), should not be born entirely by a taxable person, especially if we are talking of the SMEs.
There should be further exclusions from the right to deduct the VAT charged
There should be further exclusions from the right to deduct the VAT charged
A more rigorous and precise deduction regime on telephone charges, fuel costs and restaurant bills should be considered.
A more rigorous and precise deduction regime on telephone charges, fuel costs and restaurant bills should be considered.
If a taxable person can not prove that charges have been incurred for business purposes, the Member State in question should have the right to reject the taxable person its right to deduct.
If a taxable person can not prove that charges have been incurred for business purposes, the Member State in question should have the right to reject the taxable person its right to deduct.
The application of the reverse charge mechanism should be extended
The application of the reverse charge mechanism should be extended
The OSS-scheme should be extended to suppliers falling within reverse charge rules whose input VAT incurred in the Member State of destination is in excess of pre-defined percentage of VAT self-assessed by taxable person in that Member State.
The OSS-scheme should be extended to suppliers falling within reverse charge rules whose input VAT incurred in the Member State of destination is in excess of pre-defined percentage of VAT self-assessed by taxable person in that Member State.
Diverse national thresholds of VAT- exemption shall be unified
Diverse national thresholds of VAT- exemption shall be unified
The upper limit should be 100.000 EUR with the minimum level of 50.000 EUR for a Member State.
The upper limit should be 100.000 EUR with the minimum level of 50.000 EUR for a Member State.
To avoid revenue fall-out, the minimum limit should only apply for the first 3 years for a newly established SME.
To avoid revenue fall-out, the minimum limit should only apply for the first 3 years for a newly established SME.
Such stimulus is in line with the goals of the Lisbon Strategy.
Such stimulus is in line with the goals of the Lisbon Strategy.
Distance selling arrangements need to be closely observed
Distance selling arrangements need to be closely observed
The European Parliament should take into account possible budgetary consequences of a uniform threshold of 150.000 EUR in distance selling regime.
The European Parliament should take into account possible budgetary consequences of a uniform threshold of 150.000 EUR in distance selling regime.
This global threshold should be revised, if it turns out to be restrictive rather than stimulating for cross-border business.
This global threshold should be revised, if it turns out to be restrictive rather than stimulating for cross-border business.
A more efficient cooperation in VIES
A more efficient cooperation in VIES
VAT Information Exchange System. regime
VAT Information Exchange System. regime
Including establishment of a uniform computer based electronic database via the Member States.
Including establishment of a uniform computer based electronic database via the Member States.
A strict deadline for transmission of information between tax administrations, including request for information and export destinations for efficient combat of VAT related fraud.
A strict deadline for transmission of information between tax administrations, including request for information and export destinations for efficient combat of VAT related fraud.
Tax refund procedure
Tax refund procedure
Although the EP is not requested to give opinion on 8th Directive, the deadline of 3 months for the refund of VAT to enterprises established in other Member State than the tax authority concerned, should be extended to maximum 4 months in case of questions for clarification by the authorities and reply in 20 days of the enterprise concerned.
Although the EP is not requested to give opinion on 8th Directive, the deadline of 3 months for the refund of VAT to enterprises established in other Member State than the tax authority concerned, should be extended to maximum 4 months in case of questions for clarification by the authorities and reply in 20 days of the enterprise concerned.
Návrh směrnice Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 77/388/EHS s cílem zjednodušit povinnosti týkající se daně z přidané hodnoty
Proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC with a view to simplifying value added tax obligations
Návrh nařízení Rady, kterým se mění nařízení Rady (ES) č. 1798/2003 s ohledem na zavedení opatření správní spolupráce v oblasti zjednodušeného systému jednoho správního místa a postupu při vrácení daně z přidané hodnoty
Proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 as regards the introduction of administrative cooperation arrangements in the context of the one-stop scheme and the refund procedure for value added tax
KOM(2004)0728 – C6 0024/2005 – 2004/0261(CNS)
COM(2004)0728 – C6 0024/2005 – 2004/0261(CNS)
KOM(2004)0728 – C6 0025/2005 – 2004/0262(CNS)
COM(2004)0728 – C6 0025/2005 – 2004/0262(CNS)
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Pier Luigi Bersani, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Jan Christian Ehler, Elisa Ferreira, Robert Goebbels, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in 't Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Hans-Peter Martin, Cristobal Montoro Romero, Joseph Muscat, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, John Whittaker
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Pier Luigi Bersani, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Jan Christian Ehler, Elisa Ferreira, Robert Goebbels, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in 't Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Hans-Peter Martin, Cristobal Montoro Romero, Joseph Muscat, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, John Whittaker
o návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie podle bodu 3 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, který doplňuje interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
PE 360.140v01-00
PE 360.140v01-00
– s ohledem na návrh Komise ( KOM(2005)0247 – C6-0183/2005 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0247 - C6-0183/2005 ),
– s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
Dohoda ve znění rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2003/429/ES (Úř. věst.
Agreement amended by Decision 2003/429/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 147, 14.6.2003, p.
– s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie a podmínkách upravujících jeho využívání
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund and the conditions governing the resort to it
– s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2012/2002 ze dne 11. listopadu 2002 o zřízení Fondu solidarity Evropské unie
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– s ohledem na své legislativní usnesení ze dne 10. října 2002 o návrhu nařízení Rady o zřízení Fondu solidarity Evropské unie
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 10 October 2002 on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
– s ohledem na závěry trialogu dne 22. června 2005,
– having regard to the results of the Trialogue of 22 June 2005,
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0229/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0229/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že Evropská unie vytvořila vhodné institucionální a rozpočtové nástroje k pokrytí škod způsobených velkými přírodními katastrofami,
A. Whereas the European Union has set up the appropriate institutional and budgetary instruments to cover the damage resulting from major natural disasters,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že Slovensko požádalo o pokrytí škod způsobených vichřicí ve dnech 19. a 20. listopadu 2004,
B. Whereas Slovakia has introduced a request to cover the damage resulting from the storm of 19/20 November 2004,
2. schvaluje rozhodnutí, které je připojeno k jeho usnesení o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity EU;
Approves the decision annexed to this resolution on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund ;
o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie podle bodu 3 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, který doplňuje interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
EVROPSKÝ PARLAMENT A RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
s ohledem na interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund
C 283, 20.11.2002, s. 1. , která doplňuje interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu, a zejména její bod 3,
1. supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure, and in particular point 3 thereof,
s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES) č. 2012/2002 ze dne 11. listopadu 2002 o zřízení Fondu solidarity Evropské unie
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
s ohledem na návrh Komise,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
(1) Evropská unie zřídila Fond solidarity („fond“), aby prokázala solidaritu s obyvateli oblastí postižených katastrofou.
(1) The European Union has created a Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Slovensko v návaznosti na katastrofu způsobenou vichřicí požádalo dne 24. ledna 2005 o financování fondu.
(2) Slovakia submitted an application to mobilise the Fund on 24 January 2005, following a disaster caused by a storm.
(3) Interinstitucionální dohoda ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 umožňuje financování fondu až do výše 1 miliardy eur ročně.
(3) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 allows mobilisation of the Fund within an annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(4) Katastrofa způsobená v listopadu 2004 vichřicí na Slovensku splňuje kritéria pro uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie,
(4) The storm disaster in Slovakia in November 2004 fulfils the criteria for mobilising the European Union Solidarity Fund,
Z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie bude poskytnuta částka 5 667 578 EUR v rámci položek závazků souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2005.
The European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 5 667 578 in commitment appropriations from the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005.
Toto rozhodnutí bude zveřejněno v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie .
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union .
za Evropský parlament za Radu
For the European Parliament For the Council
Zpráva o návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o uvolnění prostředků z Fondu solidarity Evropské unie podle bodu 3 interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 7. listopadu 2002 mezi Evropským parlamentem, Radou a Komisí o financování Fondu solidarity Evropské unie, který doplňuje interinstitucionální dohodu ze dne 6. května 1999 o rozpočtové kázni a zdokonalení rozpočtového procesu
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund according to point 3 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 7 November 2002 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on the financing of the European Union Solidarity Fund supplementing the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
Výbor(y) požádaný(é) o stanovisko
Committee asked for opinion
Reimer Böge 2.9.2004
Reimer Böge 2.9.2004
Richard James Ashworth, Reimer Böge, Szabolcs Fazakas, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Neena Gill, Ingeborg Gräßle, Catherine Guy-Quint, Sergej Kozlík, Janusz Lewandowski, Gérard Onesta, László Surján, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
Richard James Ashworth, Reimer Böge, Szabolcs Fazakas, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Neena Gill, Ingeborg Gräßle, Catherine Guy-Quint, Sergej Kozlík, Janusz Lewandowski, Gérard Onesta, László Surján, Kyösti Tapio Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
PE 355.740v02-00
PE 355.740v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0060 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0060 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0230/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0230/2005 ),
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with Azerbaijan that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Azerbaijan.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with Azerbaijan that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Azerbaijan.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Azerbaijan operating within the territory of the Community.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Azerbaijan operating within the territory of the Community.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements which are referred to in the different Articles of the agreements between the EU and Azerbaijan, being: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements which are referred to in the different Articles of the agreements between the EU and Azerbaijan, being: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom.
Annex 3 lists the other states referred to, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland, which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
Annex 3 lists the other states referred to, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland, which fall under the Agreement on the European Economic Area.
The agreements negotiated by the Commission should be signed and provisionally applied.
The agreements negotiated by the Commission should be signed and provisionally applied.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to sign on behalf of the Community the above-mentioned Agreement on a provisional basis until it enters into force after completion of the necessary procedures.
The proposed Council Decision empowers the President of the Council to designate the person or persons competent to sign on behalf of the Community the above-mentioned Agreement on a provisional basis until it enters into force after completion of the necessary procedures.
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement underthe consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph.
Parliament is entitled to give its opinion on this Agreement underthe consultation procedure, in accordance with Rule 83 'International agreements', paragraph.
7, which reads as follows:
7, which reads as follows:
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Ázerbájdžánskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Azerbaijan on certain aspects of air services
Paolo Costa 15.3.2005
Paolo Costa 15.3.2005
Konzultace s Výborem regionů Datum rozhodnutí na zasedání
Committee of Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Seán Ó Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michael Henry Nattrass, Seán Ó Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady, kterým se uzavírá Dohoda mezi Evropským společenstvím a Gruzií o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Georgia on certain aspects of air services
PE 355.742v02-00
PE 355.742v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0061 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0061 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0231/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0231/2005 ),
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with Azerbaijan that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Azerbaijan.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with Georgia that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Georgia.
4 (taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt aircraft fuel in general from taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity permits such taxation for operations within the territory of the Community.
Art. 4 (taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt aircraft fuel in general from taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity permits such taxation for operations within the territory of the Community.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Azerbaijan operating within the territory of the Community.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Georgia operating within the territory of the Community.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements which are referred to in the different Articles of the agreements between the EU and Azerbaijan, being: Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom.
Annex 1 and 2 list the bilateral agreements which are referred to in the different Articles of the agreements between the EU and Georgia, Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland and the United Kingdom.
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady, kterým se uzavírá Dohoda mezi Evropským společenstvím a Gruzií o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Georgia on certain aspects of air services
Předchozí zpravodaj( ové )
Previous rapporteur (s)
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Libanonskou republikou o některých aspektech leteckých služeb
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Lebanon on certain aspects of air services
PE 355.743v02-00
PE 355.743v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0062 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0062 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0232/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0232/2005 ),
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Republic of Lebanon that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Lebanon.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated an Agreement with the Republic of Lebanon that replaces certain provisions in the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Lebanon.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Lebanon operating within the territory of the Community.
Under Article 4, the provisions of Directive 2003/96/EC likewise apply to aircraft of designated air carriers of Lebanon operating within the territory of the Community.