natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění nařízení Rady (ES) č. 1348/2000 ze dne 29. května 2000 o doručování soudních a mimosoudních písemností ve věcech občanských a obchodních v členských státech
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters
JURI 6.9.2005
JURI 6.9.2005
LIBE 6.9.2005
LIBE 6.9.2005
Jean-Paul Gauzès 15.9.2005
Jean-Paul Guazès 15.9.2005
Konzultace EP s Výborem regionů - datum rozhodnutí na zasedání
Committee of the Regions consulted – date of decision in plenary
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Marcin Libicki, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Marcin Libicki, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
o strategickém dokumentu Komise o rozšíření za rok 2005
on the Commission's 2005 enlargement strategy paper
PE 364.920v02-00
PE 364.920v03-00
– s ohledem na strategický dokument Komise o rozšíření za rok 2005 ( KOM(2005)0561 ),
– having regard to the Commission's 2005 enlargement strategy paper ( COM(2005)0561 ),
– s ohledem na návrh Komise k rozhodnutí Rady o zásadách, prioritách a podmínkách přístupového partnerství s Chorvatskem ( KOM(2005)0556 ),
– having regard to the Commission's proposal for a Council decision on the Principles, Priorities and Conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with Croatia ( COM( 2005)0556),
– s ohledem na návrh Komise k rozhodnutí Rady o zásadách, prioritách a podmínkách přístupového partnerství s Tureckem ( KOM(2005)0559 ),
– having regard to the Commission's proposal for a Council decision on the Principles, Priorities and Conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with Turkey ( COM( 2005)0559),
– s ohledem na stanovisko Komise k žádosti Bývalé jugoslávské republiky Makedonie o členství v Evropské unii ( KOM(2005)0562 ) a s tím spojený návrh rozhodnutí Rady o zásadách, prioritách a podmínkách přístupového partnerství s Bývalou jugoslávskou republikou Makedonií ( KOM(2005)0557 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on the application from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia for membership of the European Union ( COM(2005)0562 ) and its related proposal for a Council decision on the Principles, Priorities and Conditions contained in the European Partnership with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ( COM(2005)0557 ),
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise Radě o pokroku dosaženém Bosnou a Hercegovinou v provádění priorit stanovených ve „studii proveditelnosti připravenosti Bosny a Hercegoviny jednat o Dohodě o stabilizaci a přidružení s Evropskou unií (KOM(2003) 692 v konečném znění)“ ( KOM(2005)0529 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council on the progress achieved by Bosnia and Herzegovina in implementing the priorities identified in the "Feasibility Study on the preparedness of Bosnia and Herzegovina to negotiate a Stabilisation and Association Agreement with the European Union (COM(2003) 692 final)" ( COM(2005)0529 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Komise o pokroku Albánie ( SEK(2005)1421 ), Kosova ( SEK(2005)1423 ), Bosny a Hercegoviny ( SEK(2005)1422 ), Srbska a Černé Hory ( SEK(2005)1428 ), Turecka ( SEK(2005)1426 ) a Chorvatska ( SEK(2005)1424 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Progress Reports on Albania ( SEC(2005)1421 ), Kosovo ( SEC(2005)1423 ), Bosnia and Herzegovina ( SEC(2005)1422 ), Serbia and Montenegro ( SEC(2005)1428 ), Turkey ( SEC(2005)1426 ) and Croatia ( SEC(2005)1424 ),
– s ohledem na své usnesení o zahájení jednání s Tureckem
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2005 on the opening of negotiations with Turkey
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zahraniční věci ( A6‑0025/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0025/2006 ).
3. bere s uspokojením na vědomí, že podněty nabízené strategií rozšíření Evropské unie bezpochyby přispěly k zahájení reforem v Turecku, Chorvatsku a ve všech západobalkánských zemích;
Notes with satisfaction that the incentive offered by the European Union enlargement strategy has undeniably contributed to the commencement of reforms in Turkey, Croatia and all the Western Balkan countries;
13. vyzývá členské státy Evropské unie k dodržování jejich závazků týkajících se možného přistoupení daných zemí; zdůrazňuje, že účinné uplatňování politických kritérií závisí také na přesvědčení, že Evropská unie pevně zastává rozhodnutí týkající se vyhlídek na členství v EU pro tyto země;
Calls on the Member States of the European Union to respect their commitments regarding the possible accession of the countries concerned; points out that the effective application of political conditionality depends also on belief in the European Union adhering firmly to its decisions regarding European prospects for these countries;
24. očekává, že Turecko zajistí plnou nezávislost soudů a jejich řádné fungování; že okamžití odstraní mučení a špatné zacházení a vyvine rozhodné úsilí na podporu práv žen a boje proti domácímu násilí; naléhavě žádá Turecko, aby poskytlo ochranu ženám, které jsou vystaveny riziku násilí;
Expects Turkey to ensure full independence of the judiciary and its proper functioning, to eradicate torture and ill-treatment immediately, to pursue vigorously efforts to promote women's rights and to prosecute violence against women; urges Turkey to provide shelters for women at risk of violence;
27. lituje jednostranného prohlášení, které Turecko učinilo při příležitosti podepsání dodatkového protokolu k Ankarské dohodě; připomíná Turecku, že uznání všech členských států je nezbytnou součástí procesu přistoupení;
Regrets the unilateral Declaration made by Turkey on the occasion of the signature of the Additional Protocol to the Ankara Agreement; reminds Turkey that recognition of all Member States is a necessary component of the accession process;
32. vítá rozhodnutí EU zahájit v říjnu 2005 s Chorvatskem jednání o přistoupení, po hodnocení generálního prokurátora Mezinárodního trestního tribunálu pro bývalou Jugoslávii, že Chorvatsko nyní plně spolupracuje, a vítá uspokojivé pokroky, jichž bylo až dosud dosaženo; naléhavě žádá chorvatské orgány, aby pokračovaly ve svém reformním programu, nadále plně spolupracovaly s Mezinárodním trestním tribunálem a celkově posílily své správní a soudní kapacity;
Welcomes the EU's decision to open accession negotiations with Croatia in October 2005, in the wake of the ICTY Chief Prosecutor's assessment that Croatia is now fully cooperating, and commends it on the good progress made so far; urges its authorities to continue to implement its reform programme, to maintain full cooperation with the ICTY and to strengthen overall its administrative and judicial capacity;
34. zaznamenává s potěšením, že Chorvatsko splňuje nezbytná politická kritéria, ale zdůrazňuje, že čelí řadě důležitých výzev v oblasti reformy soudnictví, zejména s ohledem na značné množství nevyřízených případů a rozsudky, v nichž se projevuje etnická zaujatost proti obžalovaným srbské národnosti při pronásledování válečných zločinů; zdůrazňuje dále, že je třeba zvýšit úsilí o omezení korupce a že přes existenci ústavního zákona o národnostních menšinách, je naléhavě třeba dále zlepšovat situaci Romů;
Is pleased to note that Croatia meets the necessary political criteria but points out that it faces a number of major challenges in the field of judicial reform, particularly with regard to the large backlog of cases and with judgments showing an ethnic bias against Serb defendants in the prosecution of war crimes; in addition, stresses that efforts to reduce corruption need to be stepped up, and that, despite the Constitutional Law on National Minorities being in place, urgent action is needed to further improve the situation of the Roma;
38. vítá podepsání Memoranda o porozumění o zřízení národního fondu, které poskytuje právní základ pro zavedení decentralizovaného systému uskutečňování předvstupní pomoci EU;
Welcomes the signature of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Establishment of the National Fund, which provides a legal basis for the introduction of a decentralised implementation system for EU pre-accession assistance;
43. vyzývá Bývalou jugoslávskou republiku Makedonii, aby konstruktivně a pružně s Řeckem brzy nalezly vzájemně přijatelné řešení dosud nevyřešeného problému názvu země; zastává názor, že otázka názvu této republiky nemůže být v žádném případě překážkou pro její integraci do Evropské unie;
Calls on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to seek in a constructive and flexible manner , together with Greece, a prompt, mutually acceptable solution to the unresolved problem of the country’s name; takes the view that the question of the name of the republic does not constitute an obstacle to its further integration into the European fold;
Další západobalkánské země
Other Western Balkan countries
45. věří, že evropská strategie integrace s perspektivou členství v EU je základní pobídkou pro dosažení reforem, které jsou nezbytné pro vytvoření trvalého míru a stability v západobalkánských státech jako evropském regionu, jenž bude brzy zcela obklopen členskými státy EU;
Believes that the European integration strategy, with its prospect of EU membership, is the ultimate incentive to achieve the reforms which are necessary to create a lasting peace and stability in the Western Balkans, a European region which will soon be completely surrounded by EU Member States;
48. pobízí Komisi, aby i nadále přeorientovávala pomoc Společenství v tomto regionu a soustředila podporou EU na rozvoj účinné státní správy a soudnictví, zřízení moderního nesegregačního vzdělávacího systému, a konečně podporu opatření sociálního a ekonomického začleňování pro navrátilce; domnívá se, že tato pomoc by měla být využita k pokračování vízové politiky, který bude více zaměřená na budoucnost, vůči těmto zemím, zaměřené na boj s organizovaným zločinem, ale nebránící přeshraničním výměnám mezi obchodními komunitami, sociálními partnery a studenty;
Encourages the Commission to continue its re-orientation of Community assistance in this region and to focus EU support on the development of an efficient state administration and judiciary, the establishment of modern, non-segregational education systems and, finally, the promotion of social and economic inclusion measures for returnees; believes that this assistance should also be used to pursue a more future-oriented visa policy towards these countries, targeted at fighting organised crime but not hindering trans-border exchanges between the business community, social partners, academic staff and students;
50. naléhá na Komisi, aby pomohla Albánii ukončit pokračující krveprolití, které mimo jiné brání dětem chodit do školy a ostatním uplatňovat jejich volební právo;
Urges the Commission to help the Albania to put an end on the ongoing blood feud which amongst other things, hinders children going to school and others exercising their right to vote;
53. domnívá se, že v rámci jednání o uzavření Dohody o stabilizaci a přidružení musí být upřednostňováno další snižování potřeby zahraničního působení na vládu Bosny a Hercegoviny; vyzývá Radu a Komisi, aby připravovaly podmínky pro zrušení úřadu vysokého zástupce;
Considers that in the framework of the negotiations for the conclusion of a SAA, priority must be given to further reducing the need for international intervention in the government of Bosnia-Herzegovina; calls on the Council and Commission carefully to pave the way for winding down the Office of the High Representative;
56. vítá doporučení zvláštního vyslance generálního tajemníka OSN, že by jednání o postavení Kosova mělo být zahájeno okamžitě; je však znepokojen tím, že se ve zprávě zvláštního zpravodaje popisuje situace vztahů mezi etniky, zejména pokud jde o srbskou a romskou menšinu, jako „zlověstná“ a vyzývá dočasné orgány samosprávy, aby podnikly bezprostřední kroky ke změně této situace;
Welcomes the recommendation by the UN Secretary-General's Special Envoy that status negotiations on Kosovo should start immediately; is concerned, however, by the fact that the Special Envoy's report describes the situation of interethnic relations, particularly with regard to the Serb and Roma minorities, as "grim" and calls on the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government to take immediate action to reverse this;
60. naléhavě žádá Evropskou unii a Komisi, aby hrály vedoucí úlohu, v úzké spolupráci s OSN a všemi členy kontaktní skupiny, při jednáních o budoucím postavení Kosova; domnívá se, že tato jednání jsou výzvou pro celý region a že by všechny dotčené země měly podporovat tento proces a přijmout jeho konečné výsledky;
Urges the European Union and the Commission to play a leading role, in close cooperation with the United Nations and all members of the Contact Group, in the negotiations on the future status of Kosovo; believes that these negotiations are a challenge for the whole region and that it is for all the countries concerned to support the process and to endorse its final outcome;
Strategický dokument Komise o rozšíření za rok 2005
The Commission's 2005 enlargement strategy paper
AFET 17.11.2005
AFET 17.11.2005
INTA 17.11.2005
INTA 17.11.2005
Elmar Brok 19.10.2005
Elmar Brok 19.10.2005
Elmar Brok, Simon Coveney, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Cem Özdemir, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Elmar Brok, Simon Coveney, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Jas Gawronski, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Anna Ibrisagic, Toomas Hendrik Ilves, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Cem Özdemir, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
(PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 – 1992/0449B(COD))
(PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 – 1992/0449B(COD))
PE 367.878v02-00
PE 367.878v02-00
(PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 – 1992/0449B(COD) )
(PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 – 1992/0449B(COD) )
– s ohledem na společný návrh schválený dohodovacím výborem (PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3668/2005 – C6‑0001/2006 ),
C 128 E, 9.5.1994, s. 128. k návrhu Komise předloženému Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(1992)0560 )
146. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(1992)0560 )
– s ohledem na pozměněný návrh Komise ( KOM(1994)0284 )
– having regard to the amended proposal ( COM(1994)0284 )
Texty přijaté dne 7.9.2005, P6_TA(2005)0329 . ke společnému postoji Rady
Texts Adopted , 7.9.2005, P6_TA(2005)0329 . on the Council common position
– s ohledem na stanovisko Komise k pozměňovacím návrhům Parlamentu ke společnému postoji ( KOM(2005)0526 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2005)0526 )
– s ohledem na zprávu své delegace v dohodovacím výboru ( A6‑0026/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0026/2006 ),
On 8 February 1993 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive on minimum health and safety requirements for workers exposed to physical agents such as noise, mechanical vibrations, optical radiation, electromagnetic fields and waves.
On 8 February 1993 the Commission submitted a proposal for a Directive on minimum health and safety requirements for workers exposed to physical agents such as noise, mechanical vibrations, optical radiation, electromagnetic fields and waves.
In 1999, the Council decided to split the initial proposal into its constituent parts and to adopt an individual Directive for each type of physical agent.
In 1999, the Council decided to split the initial proposal into its constituent parts and to adopt an individual Directive for each type of physical agent.
As a result Parliament and Council adopted in turn Directive 2002/44/EC on vibrations, Directive 2003/10/EC on noise and Directive 2004/40/EC on electromagnetic fields.
As a result Parliament and Council adopted in turn Directive 2002/44/EC on vibrations, Directive 2003/10/EC on noise and Directive 2004/40/EC on electromagnetic fields.
The proposal for a Directive on the protection of workers from the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation is thus the only left-over from the initial Commission proposal; but it also proved to be the most difficult to solve.
The proposal for a Directive on the protection of workers from the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation is thus the only left-over from the initial Commission proposal; but it also proved to be the most difficult to solve.
Following Parliament's first reading on 20 April 1994 the Council adopted its common position some 11 years later, on 18 April 2005.
Following Parliament's first reading on 20 April 1994 the Council adopted its common position some 11 years later, on 18 April 2005.
The common position distinguished between, on the one hand, protection of workers from radiation from artificial sources and, on the other hand, protection from radiation from natural sources (e.g. sunlight or natural fires).
The common position distinguished between, on the one hand, protection of workers from radiation from artificial sources and, on the other hand, protection from radiation from natural sources (e.g. sunlight or natural fires).
Parliament concluded its second reading on 7 September 2005 adopting a total of 22 amendments to the Council common position, mainly seeking to exclude protection from radiation from natural sources from the scope of the directive, arguing that in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity this was an issue that should be dealt with at national level, in accordance with national conditions and needs.
Parliament concluded its second reading on 7 September 2005 adopting a total of 22 amendments to the Council common position, mainly seeking to exclude protection from radiation from natural sources from the scope of the directive, arguing that in conformity with the principle of subsidiarity this was an issue that should be dealt with at national level, in accordance with national conditions and needs.
On 21 October 2005 the Commission adopted its opinion on Parliament's second reading approach amendments proposing to accept all of them except one (amendment 5).
On 21 October 2005 the Commission adopted its opinion on Parliament's second reading approach amendments proposing to accept all of them except one (amendment 5).
As a result of this the Commission proposed to limit the scope of the Directive only to exposure from artificial sources.
As a result of this the Commission proposed to limit the scope of the Directive only to exposure from artificial sources.
The Council informed Parliament at an early stage unofficially and officially with letter from 23 November 2005 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
The Council informed Parliament at an early stage unofficially and officially with letter from 23 November 2005 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
The conciliation was then formally opened on 6 December 2005.
The conciliation was then formally opened on 6 December 2005.
The Parliament delegation held its constituent meeting on 24 October in Strasbourg.
The Parliament delegation held its constituent meeting on 24 October in Strasbourg.
Vice President Antonios TRAKATELLIS (Chair of the Delegation), Jan ANDERSSON (Chair of the Employment Committee) and Csaba ÖRY (rapporteur) were given a mandate to negotiate with the Council.
Vice President Antonios TRAKATELLIS (Chair of the Delegation), Jan ANDERSSON (Chair of the Employment Committee) and Csaba ÖRY (rapporteur) were given a mandate to negotiate with the Council.
The delegation also decided to request an opinion from the Legal Service of the European Parliament with a view to clarifying the legal situation regarding the protection of workers from exposure to natural optical radiation.
The delegation also decided to request an opinion from the Legal Service of the European Parliament with a view to clarifying the legal situation regarding the protection of workers from exposure to natural optical radiation.
A first trialogue was held on 8 November.
A first trialogue was held on 8 November.
The Council informed Parliament that it could accept 17 out of the 22 EP amendments, proposed compromises on four others and rejected amendment 5.
The Council informed Parliament that it could accept 17 out of the 22 EP amendments, proposed compromises on four others and rejected amendment 5.
In general the Council was willing to accept a limitation of the scope of the proposal under consideration to protection from radiation from artificial sources.
In general the Council was willing to accept a limitation of the scope of the proposal under consideration to protection from radiation from artificial sources.
The EP delegation met again on 15 November in Strasbourg with a view to assessing the results of the trialogue and to considering the opinion of the EP Legal Service.
The EP delegation met again on 15 November in Strasbourg with a view to assessing the results of the trialogue and to considering the opinion of the EP Legal Service.
According to the latter the issue of workers protection from natural radiation was already covered by the framework Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.
According to the latter the issue of workers protection from natural radiation was already covered by the framework Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work.
On the basis of this the rapporteur proposed, in accordance with the Commission and the Council position, to exclude any reference to exposure to natural radiation, thus limiting the scope of the proposal under consideration to artificial radiation.
On the basis of this the rapporteur proposed, in accordance with the Commission and the Council position, to exclude any reference to exposure to natural radiation, thus limiting the scope of the proposal under consideration to artificial radiation.
He also made compromise proposals for amendments 8 and 11/26.
He also made compromise proposals for amendments 8 and 11/26.
The proposed compromise package was then put to the vote and was approved by the Delegation with 13 votes in favour, 3 against and 1 abstention.
The proposed compromise package was then put to the vote and was approved by the Delegation with 13 votes in favour, 3 against and 1 abstention.
The Council considered the EP compromise proposals and accepted them in their entirety.
The Council considered the EP compromise proposals and accepted them in their entirety.