natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In line with the one step procedure, for consistency paragraph 3 of Article 12 should be deleted.
In line with the one step procedure, for consistency paragraph 3 of Article 12 should be deleted.
Všechny procedurální otázky, které nejsou specificky uvedeny v tomto nařízení, se budou řídit zákony členského státu, ve kterém se řízení evropského platebního rozkazu bude konat.
All procedural issues not specifically dealt with in this Regulation shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the European order for payment proceedings take place.
Všechny procedurální otázky, které nejsou specificky uvedeny v tomto nařízení, se budou řídit zákony členského státu, ve kterém se řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu bude konat.
All procedural issues not specifically dealt with in this Regulation shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the European order for payment proceedings take place.
Při využívání tohoto ustanovení se však členské státy nebudou snažit zavádět další procedurální nebo důkazní požadavky, ktreré by ve svém důsledku evropský platební rozkaz podkopávaly.
However, in taking advantage of this provision Member States shall not seek to introduce further procedural or evidential requirements which would have the effect of undermining the European order for payment.
Snaží se zajistit efektivní fungování řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu..
Seeks to ensure effective operation of the European Payment Order procedure.
Článek 18a (nový)
Article 18 a (new)
Článek 18a
Article 18a
Pět let poté, co vstoupí v platnost toto nařízení, předloží Komise Evropskému parlamentu a Radě podrobnou zprávu o fungování řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu.
Five years after the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council a detailed report on the operation of the European order for payment procedure.
Zpráva bude obsahovat ekonomické vyhodnocení toho, jak řízení fungovalo, a vyhodnocení rozšířeného dopadu v členění podle jednotlivých členských států, včetně analýzy poměru vynaložených prostředků k celkovému přínosu, pokud by došlo k jeho eventuálnímu rozšíření na čistě vnitrostátní případy.
That report shall contain an economic assessment of the procedure as it has operated and an extended impact assessment for each Member State , including a cost-benefit analysis of the possible extension to purely national cases.
Když zpráva prokáže, že toto řízení je nekomplikované, účinné a rentabilní a nabízí účinnou nápravu, mohla by Komise předložit Evropskému parlamentu a Radě návrh opatření, které by usnadnilo používání řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu v členských státech pro vnitrostátní případy, a navrhnout nutné pozměňovací návrhy k tomuto nařízení, zejména s ohledem na zkušenosti získané při používání tohoto řízení v přeshraničních případech a na zkušenosti těch členských států, které je používaly pro vnitrostátní případy.
In the event that the report can demonstrate that the procedure is simple, efficient and cost-effective, and that it offers effective redress, the Commission may present a proposal to the European Parliament and the Council for a measure facilitating the use of the European order for payment procedure in Member States for national cases and proposing such amendments to this Regulation as are necessary to that end having regard in particular to the experience gained in using the procedure for cross-border cases and those Member States using the procedure for national cases.
Judicial cooperation in civil matters is essential to the Treaty objective of establishing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Judicial cooperation in civil matters is essential to the Treaty objective of establishing an area of freedom, security and justice.
Legislative instruments have been brought forward with a view to approximating substantive and procedural law and facilitating access to justice and to speed up cross-border litigation.
Legislative instruments have been brought forward with a view to approximating substantive and procedural law and facilitating access to justice and to speed up cross-border litigation.
The European Enforcement Order (EEO) for uncontested claims will be transferred into national law by the end of 2005, abolishing the principle of exequator and enabling a judicial authority in one Member State to enforce an order from another Member State without a formal review.
The European Enforcement Order (EEO) for uncontested claims will be transferred into national law by the end of 2005, abolishing the principle of exequator and enabling a judicial authority in one Member State to enforce an order from another Member State without a formal review.
While the EEO creates an EU-level instrument enforcing a judgment handed down according to national procedural law, the EPO procedure introduces an EU level instrument in order to obtain an enforceable decision.
While the EEO creates an EU-level instrument enforcing a judgment handed down according to national procedural law, the EPO procedure introduces an EU level instrument in order to obtain an enforceable decision.
The high and expanding volume of trade within the EU and increased movements of people, raise the likelihood that citizens or businesses might become involved in cross-border litigation.
The high and expanding volume of trade within the EU and increased movements of people, raise the likelihood that citizens or businesses might become involved in cross-border litigation.
There is a risk that citizens may not be inclined to assert their rights because of the obstacles they could encounter in dealing with the legal systems in another Member State, in particular due to unfamiliar procedures and unknown costs.
There is a risk that citizens may not be inclined to assert their rights because of the obstacles they could encounter in dealing with the legal systems in another Member State, in particular due to unfamiliar procedures and unknown costs.
This is considered an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market and a potential disincentive to the development of cross-border business and trade.
This is considered an obstacle to the proper functioning of the internal market and a potential disincentive to the development of cross-border business and trade.
It is essential that the EU provides for a judicial area where private individuals and businesses can have access to justice and redress the case of an uncontested claim for a payment order.
It is essential that the EU provides for a judicial area where private individuals and businesses can have access to justice and redress the case of an uncontested claim for a payment order.
The Commission View
The Commission View
The European Commission argues that the procedure for the EPO should apply to both cross-border and national cases, and that Article 65 which refers to civil matters having "cross-border implications" should be interpreted in a flexible manner.
The European Commission argues that the procedure for the EPO should apply to both cross-border and national cases, and that Article 65 which refers to civil matters having "cross-border implications" should be interpreted in a flexible manner.
The Commission argues that:
The Commission argues that:
· The distinction between "cross-border" and "internal" scenarios is more difficult that it appears and could lead to arbitrary and discriminatory conclusions depending on the state of residence of the claimant.
· The distinction between "cross-border" and "internal" scenarios is more difficult that it appears and could lead to arbitrary and discriminatory conclusions depending on the state of residence of the claimant.
· The potential for every national judgment to take on a cross-border nature if it needed to be enforced in another Member State calls into question the merits of a distinction between internal and cross-border cases.
· The potential for every national judgment to take on a cross-border nature if it needed to be enforced in another Member State calls into question the merits of a distinction between internal and cross-border cases.
· A limitation to cross-border cases would distort competition in the internal market.
· A limitation to cross-border cases would distort competition in the internal market.
· Creditors or debtors may have access to or be subject to a more efficient mechanism in a cross-border situation than in their own domestic system.
· Creditors or debtors may have access to or be subject to a more efficient mechanism in a cross-border situation than in their own domestic system.
This would be inconsistent with the principle of ensuring a fair regime across the EU.
This would be inconsistent with the principle of ensuring a fair regime across the EU.
Given the difficulties experienced in Council owing to the reluctance of many Member States to accept the use of the European order for payment in cases which are not cross-border in nature, your rapporteur has sought to reach a compromise which allows those States' concerns to be taken into account without ruling out a different solution in the future when experience will have been gained with the new European instrument.
Given the difficulties experienced in Council owing to the reluctance of many Member States to accept the use of the European order for payment in cases which are not cross-border in nature, your rapporteur has sought to reach a compromise which allows those States' concerns to be taken into account without ruling out a different solution in the future when experience will have been gained with the new European instrument.
k návrhu nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o zavedení řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation creating a European order for payment procedure
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs was asked for its opinion on the proposal for a Regulation creating a European order for payment procedure.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs was asked for its opinion on the proposal for a Regulation creating a European order for payment procedure.
At the European Council meeting in Tampere, the Council and the Commission were instructed to draw up measures to strengthen judicial cooperation between Member States, including in the area of payment of uncontested claims.
At the European Council meeting in Tampere, the Council and the Commission were instructed to draw up measures to strengthen judicial cooperation between Member States, including in the area of payment of uncontested claims.
In 2002 the Commission published a Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure, on the basis of which it was established that a uniform, accelerated and cost-effective mechanism for payment of uncontested claims would help not only to improve access to the courts but also to improve the functioning of the internal market because, in practice, enterprises, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, encounter numerous difficulties in recovering uncontested claims.
In 2002 the Commission published a Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure, on the basis of which it was established that a uniform, accelerated and cost-effective mechanism for payment of uncontested claims would help not only to improve access to the courts but also to improve the functioning of the internal market because, in practice, enterprises, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, encounter numerous difficulties in recovering uncontested claims.
The Regulation lays down a simpler procedure for issuing payment orders, which will make it faster and easier for creditors to receive payment of pecuniary claims.
The Regulation lays down a simpler procedure for issuing payment orders, which will make it faster and easier for creditors to receive payment of pecuniary claims.
The procedure will be based on the use of standard forms by courts and the parties involved, which will allow the administrative procedures and electronic data processing to be simplified.
The procedure will be based on the use of standard forms by courts and the parties involved, which will allow the administrative procedures and electronic data processing to be simplified.
Draftsman’s opinion
Draftsman’s opinion
The draftsman supports the proposed Regulation but draws attention to the following points with regard to its content:
The draftsman supports the proposed Regulation but draws attention to the following points with regard to its content:
Consideration should be given to applying the procedure both in cross-border cases and national cases, with the possibility for Member States to limit application of the Regulation to cross-border cases only.
Consideration should be given to applying the procedure both in cross-border cases and national cases, with the possibility for Member States to limit application of the Regulation to cross-border cases only.
In the procedure for issuing a European order for payment the claimant should present a brief description of at least one piece of evidence and enclose copies of the relevant documents with the application.
In the procedure for issuing a European order for payment the claimant should present a brief description of at least one piece of evidence and enclose copies of the relevant documents with the application.
The possibility of a single-stage procedure for issuing payment orders should be examined.
The possibility of a single-stage procedure for issuing payment orders should be examined.
A European order for payment issued in one Member State should be enforceable in another Member State without the need for a decision declaring it enforceable in the other Member State.
A European order for payment issued in one Member State should be enforceable in another Member State without the need for a decision declaring it enforceable in the other Member State.
(8) Řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu nemá za cíl nahradit ani harmonizovat mechanismy vymáhání nesporných pohledávek existující ve vnitrostátním právu, ale má být pro věřitele další možností, přičemž možnost využít stávajících mechanismů vnitrostátního práva zůstává zachována.
(8) The European order for payment procedure should not replace or harmonise the existing mechanisms for the recovery of uncontested debts under national law but constitute an additional option for the creditor who remains free to resort to a procedure provided by domestic law .
(8) S cílem podpořit přeshraniční obchod vytvoří řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu spolehlivý právní rámec pro fyzické a právnické osoby v celé Evropské unii tím, že jim poskytne zjednodušené soudní řízení v případech přeshraničních sporů.
(8) The European order for payment procedure will create for natural and legal persons throughout the EU a secure legal framework providing a simplified procedure in cross-border cases to assist cross-border business.
Mělo by také sloužit jako model pro vnitrostátní právní systémy, zejména pokud dosud neexistují rovnocenné účinné postupy.
In this way, the European order for payment procedure should also serve as a model for national legal systems, in particular where such efficient procedures do not yet exist .
This recital clarifies that the present draft regulation serves mainly two purposes.
This recital clarifies that the present draft regulation serves mainly two purposes.
On the one hand, a reliable legal framework should be created for cross-border transactions.
On the one hand, a reliable legal framework should be created for cross-border transactions.
It can be assumed that even today citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises avoid such transactions because of ignorance of national legal systems and concerns over their ability to enforce their claims effectively in the event of problems occurring.
It can be assumed that even today citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises avoid such transactions because of ignorance of national legal systems and concerns over their ability to enforce their claims effectively in the event of problems occurring.
On the other hand the Regulation – outside its immediate scope of application – will serve also as a model for the Member States of the European Union, particularly those which do not have an order for payment system, to provide within their national legal system a procedure which will be of benefit to citizens and companies in providing a fast and efficient mechanism to enforce uncontested claims.
On the other hand the Regulation – outside its immediate scope of application – will serve also as a model for the Member States of the European Union, particularly those which do not have an order for payment system, to provide within their national legal system a procedure which will be of benefit to citizens and companies in providing a fast and efficient mechanism to enforce uncontested claims.
Toto nařízení se uplatňuje v civilních a obchodních věcech bez ohledu na druh jurisdikce.
This Regulation shall apply in civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Netýká se zejména daňových, celních a správních záležitostí.
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters.
Toto nařízení se uplatňuje v občanskoprávních a obchodních přeshraničních sporech bez ohledu na druh soudu .
This Regulation shall apply in cross-border cases to civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Netýká se zejména daňových, celních a správních záležitostí .
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters.
The scope of the Regulation should be limited to cross-border disputes.
The scope of the Regulation should be limited to cross-border disputes.
In this way a noticeable added value is created for European citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises in Member States.
In this way a noticeable added value is created for European citizens and small and medium-sized enterprises in Member States.
An appropriate legal framework is created for their business activities in the European internal market when enforcing uncontested claims.
An appropriate legal framework is created for their business activities in the European internal market when enforcing uncontested claims.
At the same time, we avoid creating insecurity and uncertainty in national procedures by the creation of an additional parallel national system for purely internal disputes.
At the same time, we avoid creating insecurity and uncertainty in national procedures by the creation of an additional parallel national system for purely internal disputes.
Consequent inefficiencies and unnecessary costs are also avoided.
Consequent inefficiencies and unnecessary costs are also avoided.
Where there are no existing efficient national procedures, however, this Regulation can serve as a model for the adoption of national procedures.
Where there are no existing efficient national procedures, however, this Regulation can serve as a model for the adoption of national procedures.
Thus the legal base of Article 61(c) in connection with Article 65 of EU-Treaty is used extensively and safeguarded.
Thus the legal base of Article 61(c) in connection with Article 65 of EU-Treaty is used extensively and safeguarded.
e) stručný popis alespoň jednoho důkazního materiálu, který lze předložit v řádném občanskoprávním řízení na podporu nároku.
(e) the brief description of at least one means of evidence that could be adduced in ordinary civil proceedings to support the claim.
For the sake of efficiency, the use of automatic data processing is required, which means that it would be sufficient, particularly in the case of non-contentious claims, for the creditor merely to state the type of evidence he has.
For the sake of efficiency, the use of automatic data processing is required, which means that it would be sufficient, particularly in the case of non-contentious claims, for the creditor merely to state the type of evidence he has.
The court would then examine the application and if it met all the requirements under the Regulation the court would not examine the evidence itself.
The court would then examine the application and if it met all the requirements under the Regulation the court would not examine the evidence itself.
The debtor would always be able to disagree with the procedure.
The debtor would always be able to disagree with the procedure.
After five years it will be clear from practical experience whether the Regulation should also apply to cases where the parties are domiciled in the same Member State.
After five years it will be clear from practical experience whether the Regulation should also apply to cases where the parties are domiciled in the same Member State.
In that case the Commission should draw up an amendment to the effect that it would apply to national cases as well as cross-border cases.
In that case the Commission should draw up an amendment to the effect that it would apply to national cases as well as cross-border cases.
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o zavedení řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu
Proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation creating a European order for payment procedure
Mihael Brejc 21.2.2005
Mihael Brejc 21.2.2005
Roberta Angelilli, Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Maria Carlshamre, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Kinga Gál, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Edith Mastenbroek, Inger Segelström, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka
Roberta Angelilli, Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Maria Carlshamre, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Charlotte Cederschiöld, Carlos Coelho, Kinga Gál, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Edith Mastenbroek, Inger Segelström, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o zavedení řízení o evropském platebním rozkazu
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council creating a European order for payment procedure
Vý bory požádané o stanovisko Datum oznámení na zasedání
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
Arlene McCarthy 14.9.2004
Arlene McCarthy 14.9.2004
Maria Berger, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Hans-Peter Mayer, Viktória Mohácsi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Maria Berger, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Hans-Peter Mayer, Viktória Mohácsi, Aloyzas Sakalas, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka
k návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o podpisu Dodatkového protokolu k Dohodě zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským hospodářským společenstvím a Tureckem v důsledku rozšíření Evropské unie
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey following the enlargement of the European Union
PE 360.099v02-00
PE 360.099v01-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2005)0191 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0191 )
– s ohledem na text Rady (9617/2005),
- having regard to the text of the Council (9617/2005),
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro zahraniční věci ( A6‑0241/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0241/2005 ),
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o podpisu Dodatkového protokolu k Dohodě zakládající přidružení mezi Evropským hospodářským společenstvím a Tureckem v důsledku rozšíření Evropské unie
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Additional Protocol to the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey following the enlargement of the European Union
Elmar Brok 21.6.2005
Elmar Brok 21.6.2005