natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission should continue to support the activities of the European Inter-University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation, originally set up to deliver a programme specifically targeted at addressing this issue.
The Commission should continue to support the activities of the European Inter-University Centre for Human Rights and Democratisation, originally set up to deliver a programme specifically targeted at addressing this issue.
Návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí integrovaný akční program v oblasti celoživotního vzdělávání
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning
Proinsias De Rossa 13.9.2004
Proinsias De Rossa 13.9.2004
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Edward McMillan-Scott, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Marek Maciej Siwiec, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto, Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Camiel Eurlings, Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Georgios Karatzaferis, Ioannis Kasoulides, Bogdan Klich, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Cecilia Malmström, Edward McMillan-Scott, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Marek Maciej Siwiec, István Szent-Iványi, Konrad Szymański, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Karl von Wogau, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
STANOVISKO ROZPOČTOVÉHO VÝBORU
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets
The European Commission already announced in its Communication on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013
The European Commission already announced in its Communication on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013
COM(2004) 0487 an integrated programme for lifelong learning.
COM(2004)0487 . an integrated programme for lifelong learning.
It included the programme in Heading 1a "competitiveness for growth and employment".
It included the programme in Heading 1a "competitiveness for growth and employment".
The total expenditure proposed for education and training represents approximately 10% of this heading.
The total expenditure proposed for education and training represents approximately 10% of this heading.
At the last European Council meeting of March 2005, the European Institutions committed themselves to continuing with the education and training 2010 work programme and considered Lifelong Learning as a conditio sine qua non for the achievement of the Lisbon strategy objectives
At the last European Council meeting of March 2005, the European Institutions committed themselves to continuing with the education and training 2010 work programme and considered Lifelong Learning as a conditio sine qua non for the achievement of the Lisbon strategy objectives
Presidency conclusions, Brussels European Council, March 2005, paragraph 34. .
Presidency conclusions, Brussels European Council, March 2005, paragraph 34. .
In July 2004, the Commission adopted a proposal establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning
In July 2004, the Commission adopted a proposal establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning
The proposal consists of:
The proposal consists of:
(A) -A new integrated programme comprising four specific sectoral programmes :
(A) -A new integrated programme comprising four specific sectoral programmes :
· Comenius (minimum allocation: 10% of the global envelope);
· Comenius (minimum allocation: 10% of the global envelope);
· Erasmus (minimum allocation: 40% of the global envelope);
· Erasmus (minimum allocation: 40% of the global envelope);
· Leonardo da Vinci (minimum allocation: 25% of the global envelope);
· Leonardo da Vinci (minimum allocation: 25% of the global envelope);
· Grundtvig (minimum allocation: 3% of the global envelope);
· Grundtvig (minimum allocation: 3% of the global envelope);
The Commission proposes a minimum benchmarking in the budget available for each sectoral programme to be devoted to support mobility, as follows: 85% of the budget available in Comenius and Erasmus, 75% of the budget available in Leonardo da Vinci and 60% of the budget available in Grundtvig.
The Commission proposes a minimum benchmarking in the budget available for each sectoral programme to be devoted to support mobility, as follows: 85% of the budget available in Comenius and Erasmus, 75% of the budget available in Leonardo da Vinci and 60% of the budget available in Grundtvig.
(B) -A transversal programme comprising four key activities: policy development, mainstream language action in the sectoral programmes, innovative approaches to teaching and learning (e-learning), exploitation and transfer of good project results into educational and vocational training systems.
(B) -A transversal programme comprising four key activities: policy development, mainstream language action in the sectoral programmes, innovative approaches to teaching and learning (e-learning), exploitation and transfer of good project results into educational and vocational training systems.
Here no benchmarking has been proposed by the Commission.
Here no benchmarking has been proposed by the Commission.
(C) -The Jean Monnet programme will comprise:
(C) -The Jean Monnet programme will comprise:
· The Jean Monnet action (with at least 28% of the budget available)
· The Jean Monnet action (with at least 28% of the budget available)
· Operating grants to specified institutions (with at least 44% of the budget available)
· Operating grants to specified institutions (with at least 44% of the budget available)
· Operating grants to other European institutions and associations in the fields of education and training (with at least 18% of the budget available).
· Operating grants to other European institutions and associations in the fields of education and training (with at least 18% of the budget available).
The Erasmus Mundus programme , which has just been launched and runs to 2008, will be incorporated as an additional programme in the integrated programme from 2009.
The Erasmus Mundus programme , which has just been launched and runs to 2008, will be incorporated as an additional programme in the integrated programme from 2009.
The legislative decision-making procedure will be codecision .
The legislative decision-making procedure will be codecision .
This means a significant change for Leonardo da Vinci which, under the current legal basis, falls under the consultation procedure.
This means a significant change for Leonardo da Vinci which, under the current legal basis, falls under the consultation procedure.
The Commission proposes an indicative financial amount of EUR 13,620 billion for the 7 years of the Programme.
The Commission proposes an indicative financial amount of EUR 13,620 billion for the 7 years of the Programme.
The schedule of commitment/payments proposed is as follows (in million €):
The schedule of commitment/payments proposed is as follows (in million €):
The Commission proposal increases decentralisation.
The Commission proposal increases decentralisation.
National Agencies will be responsible for mobility actions, small-scale partnership between institutions, transfer of innovation projects and some work on the dissemination and exploitation of results.
National Agencies will be responsible for mobility actions, small-scale partnership between institutions, transfer of innovation projects and some work on the dissemination and exploitation of results.
The Commission proposal can be welcomed, since the administrative and financial procedures have been improved but are still disproportionately burdensome and slow.
The Commission proposal can be welcomed, since the administrative and financial procedures have been improved but are still disproportionately burdensome and slow.
The new mobility actions proposed by the Commission are also welcomed
The new mobility actions proposed by the Commission are also welcomed
Upper secondary pupil mobility (Comenius); special student mobility and long-term teachers mobility (Erasmus); adult learners mobility and European assistants (Grundtvig). , especially the new action on upper secondary pupil mobility, which is in line with the European Parliament's APS priorities as set out in its resolution on the 2006 budget.
Upper secondary pupil mobility (Comenius); special student mobility and long-term teachers mobility (Erasmus); adult learners mobility and European assistants (Grundtvig). , especially the new action on upper secondary pupil mobility, which is in line with the European Parliament's APS priorities as set out in its resolution on the 2006 budget.
The Commission proposal nonetheless raises a number of comments:
The Commission proposal nonetheless raises a number of comments:
It has reduced the EU target for the Comenius programme from 10%
It has reduced the EU target for the Comenius programme from 10%
Commission Communication on the new generation of Community education and training programmes after 2006, COM (2004)0-156 of school pupils and teachers involved in Comenius to 5%.
Commission Communication on the new generation of Community education and training programmes after 2006, COM(2004)0156 . of school pupils and teachers involved in Comenius to 5%.
This is even lower than the current Socrates decision participation rate, which is 10% of the schools
This is even lower than the current Socrates decision participation rate, which is 10% of the schools
Decision N° 253/2000/EC, recital 6. .
Decision N° 253/2000/EC, recital 6. .
The Erasmus individual mobility grant (€150 per month) has not been changed since 1993.
The Erasmus individual mobility grant (€150 per month) has not been changed since 1993.
Even if the proposal intends to increase this amount gradually to reach €250 per month by the end of the programme, the reduced amount of the grant will continue to be the main obstacle for students to participate in Erasmus.
Even if the proposal intends to increase this amount gradually to reach €250 per month by the end of the programme, the reduced amount of the grant will continue to be the main obstacle for students to participate in Erasmus.
Despite the fact that the role of the mobility actions has been emphasised, the budgetary allocation is still very modest (see table).
Despite the fact that the role of the mobility actions has been emphasised, the budgetary allocation is still very modest (see table).
The Erasmus Mundus Programme will be incorporated into the integrated programme from 2009, therefore an appropriate margin should be left available under Heading 1a.
The Erasmus Mundus Programme will be incorporated into the integrated programme from 2009, therefore an appropriate margin should be left available under Heading 1a.
According to the Commission financial statement annexed to the proposal, mobility actions in the Leonardo da Vinci programme, in budgetary terms, amount to more than the 75% benchmarked in Article 30.
According to the Commission financial statement annexed to the proposal, mobility actions in the Leonardo da Vinci programme, in budgetary terms, amount to more than the 75% benchmarked in Article 30.
It should be pointed out that the amount for the financial framework mentioned in Article 15 can only be considered indicative at this stage, since there has been no decision on the financial perspectives as yet.
It should be pointed out that the amount for the financial framework mentioned in Article 15 can only be considered indicative at this stage, since there has been no decision on the financial perspectives as yet.
An amendment is thus proposed to the legislative resolution, and this can be reflected, if members so wish, in Article 15.
An amendment is thus proposed to the legislative resolution, and this can be reflected, if members so wish, in Article 15.
In order to assure an efficient comitology procedure, the traditional approach of the Committee on Budget has always been the advisory procedure.
In order to assure an efficient comitology procedure, the traditional approach of the Committee on Budget has always been the advisory procedure.
An amendment is thus proposed to Article 10.
An amendment is thus proposed to Article 10.
In order to assure coherence and simplification, a common article on implementing measures for all the programmes is proposed.
In order to assure coherence and simplification, a common article on implementing measures for all the programmes is proposed.
This article includes the Commission proposals for project selection among the measures to be adopted, as is currently the case, in order to assure transparency.
This article includes the Commission proposals for project selection among the measures to be adopted, as is currently the case, in order to assure transparency.
An amendment is thus proposed to create a new Article 9a, which will have as consequence the deletion of Articles 9, 21, 26, 31, 36, 39 and 44.
An amendment is thus proposed to create a new Article 9a, which will have as consequence the deletion of Articles 9, 21, 26, 31, 36, 39 and 44.
1a. zdůrazňuje, že finanční prostředky na období po roce 2006 uvedené v legislativním návrhu závisí na rozhodnutí o příštím víceletém finančním rámci;
Points out that the appropriations indicated in the legislative proposal beyond 2006 are subject to the decision on the next multiannual financial framework;
1b. vyzývá Komisi, aby v případě nutnosti předložila po přijetí víceletého finančního rámce návrh na úpravu referenční částky programu;
Calls on the Commission, once the next multiannual financial framework is adopted, to present, if appropriate, a proposal to adjust the financial reference amount of the programme;
The reference amount for the financial framework cannot be set until such time as a decision has been reached on the Financial Perspective.
The reference amount for the financial framework cannot be set until such time as a decision has been reached on the Financial Perspective.
Dosud nezveřejněný v Úředním věstníku.
Not yet published in OJ
Článek 9 a (nový)
Article 9 a (new)
(a) ročního plán práce;
(a) the annual plan of work;
(b) ročního rozpočtu a rozdělení prostředků mezi různými činnostmi programů;
(b) the annual budget and the distribution of funds between the various actions of the programmes;
(c) obecných pokynů pro provádění programů, výběrových kritérií a postupů;
(c) the general guidelines for implementing the programmes, the selection criteria and procedures;
(d) rozdělení prostředků určených na činnosti, které budou spravovány prostřednictvím „postupů národních agentur“ popsaných v příloze, mezi členské státy;
(d) the distribution of funds among the Member States for the actions to be managed through the “National agency procedure” set out in the Annex;
(e) opatření pro sledování a vyhodnocování programů a pro šíření a předávání výsledků;
(e) the arrangements for monitoring and evaluating the programmes and for the dissemination and transfer of results;
(f) návrhy Komise na výběr projektů.
(f) the Commission proposals for project selection.
In order to make the legislative act clearer a common article on implementation measures for all the programmes comprised is needed.
In order to make the legislative act clearer a common article on implementation measures for all the programmes comprised is needed.
The traditional approach of the Committee on Budget is the advisory procedure in order to assure efficient and speedy procedures.
The traditional approach of the Committee on Budget is the advisory procedure in order to assure efficient and speedy procedures.
The Commission proposals for project selection may be submitted to the Committee (as is currently the case) for transparency reasons.
The Commission proposals for project selection may be submitted to the Committee (as is currently the case) for transparency reasons.
This is an horizontal amendment that applies to all programmes and in consequence the current Articles 9, 21, 26, 31, 36, 39, and 44 will be deleted.
This is an horizontal amendment that applies to all programmes and in consequence the current Articles 9, 21, 26, 31, 36, 39, and 44 will be deleted.
Finanční rámec pro provádění i ntegrovaného programu je tímto stanoven na 13 620 milionů EUR.
The financial framework for the implementation of the Integrated Programme is hereby set at EUR 13,620 million.
Orientační finanční rámec pro provádění tohoto nástroje je stanoven na 13 620 milionů EUR na období 7 let počínaje 1. lednem 2007 .
The indicative financial framework for the implementation of this instrument is set at EUR 13,620 million for the period of 7 years as from 1 January 2007.
The reference amount for the financial framework is indicative unter the time that a decision has been reached on the Financial Perspective.
The reference amount for the financial framework is indicative until the time that a decision has been reached on the Financial Perspective.
TOTAL POPULATION
TOTAL POPULATION
FINANCIAL IMPACT
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Over and above the Commission proposal
Over and above the Commission proposal.
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/ POPULATION COVERED
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/ POPULATION COVERED
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/ FINANCIAL IMPACT
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/ FINANCIAL IMPACT
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/
COMMISSION PROPOSAL/
5,3 million per year
5,3 million per year
At a unit cost of €2000 (2004 prices)
At a unit cost of €2000 (2004 prices)
Commission proposal level. = +€72 billion
Commission proposal level. = +€72 billion
6 691
6 691
15 498
15 498
€1,6 billion
€1,6 billion
Upper secondary pupil mobility
Upper secondary pupil mobility
Shool partnership without mobility
School partnership without mobility
Cost of covering 100% of all school pupils= €32 billion
Cost of covering 100% of all school pupils= €32 billion
(Standard student mobility)
(Standard student mobility)
4 million
4 million per year
At the Commissions proposed grant levels
At the Commissions proposed grant levels
Average €200 : +€ 45 billion
Average €200. : +€ 45 billion
1 721 262
1 721 262
3 021 161
3 021 161
€6 billion
€6 billion
At €250 per month: +51 billion
At €250 per month: +51 billion
At €400 per month: +83 billion
At €400 per month: +83 billion
At €500 per month: +104 billion
At €500 per month: +104 billion
Reimer Böge, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Ingeborg Gräßle, Catherine Guy-Quint, Ville Itälä, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Janusz Lewandowski, Wojciech Roszkowski, Antonis Samaras, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Yannick Vaugrenard, Ralf Walter
Reimer Böge, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Ingeborg Gräßle, Catherine Guy-Quint, Ville Itälä, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Janusz Lewandowski, Wojciech Roszkowski, Antonis Samaras, László Surján, Helga Trüpel, Yannick Vaugrenard, Ralf Walter
k návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí integrovaný akční program v oblasti celoživotního vzdělávání
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision establishing an integrated action programme in the field of lifelong learning
Výbor pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci vítá iniciativu ze strany Evropské komise, která má za cíl navrhnout program v oblasti celoživotního vzdělávání a odborné přípravy zahrnující všechny stávající programy doplněné o činnosti přispívající k rozvoji vyspělé společnosti založené na znalostech, která se vyznačuje větším počtem a vyšší kvalitou pracovních míst a větší sociální soudržností, v souladu s lisabonskými cíli.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs welcomes the Commission’s initiative in proposing a programme in the field of lifelong education and training bringing together all existing programmes, as well as cross-disciplinary measures, to help in the development of an advanced knowledge-based society with more and better quality jobs and greater social cohesion, in accordance with the Lisbon objectives.
Výbor pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci přesto lituje, že počet cílů v rámci těchto programů není dostatečný s ohledem na obyvatelstvo v daných zemích a na potřeby pro rozvoj mobility studentů a osob, které se vzdělávají v evropském prostoru vzdělávání a odborné přípravy.
However, the committee regrets the fact that the programme's quantitative objectives are limited, given the number of people concerned and the resources needed to improve the mobility of students and those in training in the European area of education and vocational training.
Náš výbor vyjadřuje dvě konkrétní obavy:
The committee has two specific concerns, namely:
a) aby se podařilo profesní rozměr, který je součástí programu ERASMUS, přeměnit na odhodlání udělat z vysokoškolského vzdělání „nezávislý celek“ vyplývající z jednoho programu,
(a) that the vocational dimension incorporated into the ERASMUS programme could signal a desire to make higher education an ‘autonomous package’ covered by a single programme,
b) aby program LEONARDO DA VINCI nebyl zbaven svého skutečného obsahu a původního cíle.
(b) that the LEONARDO DA VINCI programme could be deprived of its substance and initial objectives.
Výbor pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci vyzývá národní agentury, členské státy a Komisi, aby zaručily správné rozdělení fondů mezi akce programu ERASMUS určené pro vysoké školy a akce programu ERASMUS určené pro zařízení pro odborné vzdělávání na vyšší úrovni.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on national agencies, Member States and the Commission to ensure that funds are fairly distributed between measures under the ERASMUS programme to support higher educational establishments and those to support higher vocational training establishments.
Mimo jiné se náš výbor domnívá, že příslušná oddělení Komise by měla v duchu prohlášení z Lisabonu a Stockholmu stanovit společné hlavní zásady pro vypracování plánu týkajícího se působností a systémů platnosti, který by bylo možno používat pro zjednodušení vzájemného uznávání osvědčení, diplomů a univerzitních titulů.
The committee also believes that, in the spirit of the Lisbon and Stockholm declarations, the relevant Commission departments should develop joint guidelines for drawing up skills plans and accreditation systems that could be used to facilitate mutual recognition of certificates, diplomas and university qualifications.
Vzdělávání: sociální právo
Education - a social right
Náš výbor je přesvědčen, že tento integrovaný akční program v oblasti vzdělávání a odborné přípravy přispěje ke splnění sociální nutnosti a potřebám evropského trhu práce, ale zdůrazňuje, že vzdělávání a odborná příprava patří mezi sociální právo stejně jako věk, pohlaví nebo sociální původ každé osoby.
The committee firmly believes that this integrated education and training action programme is contributing to a social need and helping to meet the requirements of the European labour market, but stresses that education and training are also a social right, irrespective of age, gender or social background.