natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evidence shows that the sociocultural 'heritage' of the recent past may be digested only gradually, through an ongoing process of applying the rights available to all of the many new citizens of the EU, with particular emphasis on those considered to be the most vulnerable and the most exposed, principally ethnic or cultural minorities and immigrants from third countries.
Evidence shows that the socio-cultural 'heritage' of the recent past may be digested only gradually, through an ongoing process of applying the rights available to all of the many new citizens of the EU, with particular emphasis on those considered to be the most vulnerable and the most exposed, principally ethnic or cultural minorities and immigrants from third countries.
The task is, therefore, huge, because the consideration and analysis of any progress made in providing the most vulnerable citizens of the EU in the new Member States with access to fundamental rights in terms of social inclusion and the fight against discrimination of all kinds is proving to be the weakest link in an unbroken chain of often binding commitments that the Member States have undertaken to enforce.
The task is, therefore, huge, because the consideration and analysis of any progress made in providing the most vulnerable citizens of the EU in the new Member States with access to fundamental rights in terms of social inclusion and the fight against discrimination of all kinds is proving to be the weakest link in an unbroken chain of often binding commitments that the Member States have undertaken to enforce.
Výbor pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci vyzývá Výbor pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Vyzývá Komisi, aby:
Calls on the Commission to:
a) znovu zvážila vhodnost použití otevřené metody koordinace, která se nezdá, pokud jde o prověřování přístupu k základním právům a boj proti všem formám diskriminace, být k dosažení předepsaného cíle nejvhodnější;
(a) reconsider the appropriateness of using the open method of coordination, which, with regard to examining access to fundamental rights and the fight against all forms of discrimination, does not appear to be entirely suitable for achieving the assigned objective;
b) uplatňovala pomocí vhodných finančních prostředků novou strategii boje proti sociálnímu vyloučení s cílem přiblížit občany a obyvatele nových členských států evropskému projektu;
(b) implement the new strategy for fighting social exclusion using appropriate financial means, with a view to bringing the citizens and residents of the new Member States closer to the European project;
c) přehodnotila opatření uvedená ve jejím sdělení ve prospěch přístupu založeného na komplexní syntéze tak, aby se do středu pozornosti dostaly nedostatky v respektování občanských svobod, přístup k základním právům a boj proti všem formám diskriminace a aby doporučila vhodné kontrolní nástroje, které usnadní vypracování případných sankcí;
(c) reorient the measures set out in its communication in terms of an approach based on an across-the-board synthesis, recentring it more closely on failure to respect civil liberties, access to fundamental rights and the fight against all forms of discrimination, and to recommend suitable control mechanisms that will facilitate the task of preparing any sanctions that may be needed;
d) jasněji vykreslila problémy spojené s dostupností práva a spravedlnosti v nových členských státech, spolu s podrobnější analýzou migračních pohybů, která by rozlišovala mezi přistěhovalectvím státních příslušníků třetích zemí a postavením jiných etnických či kulturních menšin (Romů, německy hovořících komunit atd.);
(d) highlight more clearly the problems relating to access to the law and justice in the new Member States, with a more detailed analysis of migration patterns, distinguishing between immigration of third-country nationals and the situation of other ethnic or cultural minorities (Roma, German-speaking communities, etc);
e) přezkoumala stávající rozdělení odpovědnosti v oblasti sociálního začlenění mezi Unií, členskými státy a regiony a navrhla, jak institucionalizovat postup založený na „osvědčených metodách“;
(e) review the existing division of responsibilities among the Union, the Member States and the regions with regard to social inclusion, and propose means of institutionalising the 'best practice' approach;
f) podporovala mechanizmy interakce s členskými státy za účelem vypracování textů s cílem zajistit skutečný přístup zranitelných skupin a menšin k právnímu systému (právní pomoc, informační centra, bezplatné poskytování poradenství atd.), a vybízí členské státy, aby na místní úrovni vypracovaly společné harmonizované strategie zabývající se otázkou sociálního začlenění;
(f) promote mechanisms for interaction with the Member States in order to produce texts with a view to ensuring real access to the legal system for vulnerable groups and minorities (legal aid, information centres, provision of advice free of charge, etc), and to encourage Member States to devise common, harmonised strategies on social inclusion at local level;
g) zracionalizovala a zjednodušila nouzové postupy s cílem dosáhnout snížení chudoby a vyloučení v členských státech obecně;
(g) streamline and simplify the emergency procedures, with a view to achieving the objective of reducing poverty and exclusion in the Member States in general;
h) vymezila a sestavila společné schéma či „červenou linii“, která by mohla sloužit jako společný základ pro přístup k právu a jako sjednocující moment pro různé právní koncepce v této oblasti uvnitř Unie;
(h) define and construct a common tableau or 'red line' which could serve as a shared basis for access to the law and unification of approaches to the law in this field within the Union;
Sociální začlenění v nových členských státech
Social inclusion in the new Member States
Marie-Line Reynaud 25.11.2004
Marie-Line Reynaud 25.11.2004
Datum schválení
Date suggestions adopted
Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Rosa Díez González, Antoine Duquesne, Patrick Gaubert, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Ole Krarup, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Romano Maria La Russa, Sarah Ludford, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Hartmut Nassauer, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Rosa Díez González, Antoine Duquesne, Patrick Gaubert, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Ole Krarup, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Stavros Lambrinidis, Romano Maria La Russa, Sarah Ludford, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Hartmut Nassauer, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
STANOVISKO výboru pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality
k sociální integraci v nových členských státech
on Social inclusion in the new Member States
Výbor pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví vyzývá Výbor pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci jako zodpovědný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality calls on the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. vzhledem k tomu, že z hlediska sociálního vyloučení jsou nejzranitelnějšími skupinami rodiny samoživitelů, starší ženy, ženy náležející k menšinovým skupinám, postižení lidé atd.,
A. whereas in terms of social exclusion, the most vulnerable groups are single-parent families, elderly women, women belonging to minority groups, disabled people , etc.,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že největší podíl mezi osobami ohroženými chudobou tvoří děti,
B. whereas the highest proportion of those at risk of poverty are children,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že přechod k tržnímu hospodářství v nových členských státech vytvořil nový sociální jev v podobě nezaměstnanosti, která je úzce spjata s chudobou a sociálním vyloučením,
C. whereas the transition towards a market-oriented economy in the new Member States has created a new social phenomenon in the form of unemployment, closely linked with poverty and social exclusion,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že v boji s chudobou a sociálním vyloučením nové členské státy buď posílily sociální síť, což vedlo k závislosti na sociálních dávkách, nebo chudobu považovaly prostě za osobní selhání a na tomto základě vytvářely opatření,
D. whereas in order to combat poverty and social exclusion, the new Member States have either strengthened the social net, which has led to a dependency on social benefits, or considered poverty simply as a personal failure, drawing up measures on that basis,
2. požaduje, aby nové členské státy při formulování politiky sociální integrace věnovaly zvláštní pozornost vymýcení chudoby, kterou trpí zvlášť ženy a děti a etnické menšiny;
Requests that, when formulating their social inclusion policy, the new Member States focus special attention on the eradication of poverty suffered in particular by women and children and ethnic minorities;
5. zdůrazňuje, že v rámci připojování k eurozóně by nové členské státy měly vytvořit nezbytné přechodné mechanizmy, aby se zajistilo, že přijetí eura nevžene velké skupiny společnosti do chudoby, zejména starší osoby žijící z nízkých důchodů a osoby žijící ze sociálních dávek, což jsou převážně ženy;
Stresses that in joining the Eurozone, the new Member States should make the necessary transitional arrangements in order to ensure that the adoption of the Euro does not sweep large groups of society into poverty, notably elderly people living on low pensions and people living on social benefits, who are largely women;
9. poukazuje na to, že vysoce kvalitní vzdělávací soustava přístupná všem za rovných podmínek musí účinněji než dosud zohledňovat podmínky na rychle se měnícím pracovním trhu; zastává stanovisko, že celoživotní vzdělávání musí být přístupné všem, bez ohledu na předchozí vzdělání, společenské postavení a finanční možnosti;
Points to the need to allow more effectively than hitherto for conditions on a fast-changing labour market, in a high-quality education system accessible to all on equal terms; and maintains that lifelong learning has to be accessible to all, irrespective of their earlier educational path, social standing, or financial solvency;
Sociální integrace v nových členských státech
Social inclusion in the new Member States
Navrhovatel(ka) Datum jmenování
Draftsperson Date appointed
Edit Bauer 25.11.2004
Edit Bauer 25.11.2004
Edit Bauer, Edite Estrela, Věra Flasarová, Nicole Fontaine, Lissy Gröner, Zita Gurmai, Lívia Járóka, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Urszula Krupa, Astrid Lulling, Angelika Niebler, Siiri Oviir, Doris Pack, Marie-Line Reynaud, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Eva-Britt Svensson, Anna Záborská
Edit Bauer, Edite Estrela, Věra Flasarová, Nicole Fontaine, Lissy Gröner, Zita Gurmai, Lívia Járóka, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Urszula Krupa, Astrid Lulling, Angelika Niebler, Siiri Oviir, Doris Pack, Marie-Line Reynaud, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Eva-Britt Svensson, Anna Záborská
Katerina Batzeli, Christa Klaß.
Katerina Batzeli, Christa Klaß.
Csaba Őry 10.11.2004
Csaba Őry 10.11.2004
Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jiří Maštálka, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacek Protasiewicz, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker, Gabriele Zimmer
Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jiří Maštálka, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacek Protasiewicz, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker, Gabriele Zimmer
Mihael Brejc, Françoise Castex, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Elisabeth Schroedter, Patrizia Toia, Anja Weisgerber
Mihael Brejc, Françoise Castex, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Elisabeth Schroedter, Patrizia Toia, Anja Weisgerber
Datum předložení - A [6]
Date tabled – A6
PE 353.736v03-00
PE 353.736v03-00
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Radě ( KOM(2004)0712 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2004)0712 )
– s ohledem na článek 36 a 37 Smlouvy o ES, podle kterého byl konzultován Radou ( C6‑0220/2004 ),
– having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0220/2004 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova ( A6‑0126/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0126/2005 ),
With this proposal, the Commission seeks to alter the financing of exceptional market support measures applied in the case of outbreaks of infectious diseases such as Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Classical Swine Fever (CSF).
With this proposal, the Commission seeks to alter the financing of exceptional market support measures applied in the case of outbreaks of infectious diseases such as Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Classical Swine Fever (CSF).
Under the relevant Council regulations only 100% funding from the EC budget is possible, and this is confirmed by the European Court of Justice’s judgement in Case C-239/01
Under the relevant Council regulations only 100% funding from the EC budget is possible, and this is confirmed by the European Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-239/01
The Commission’s argument in favour of co-financing is that the Member States are responsible for the measures to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
The Commission’s argument in favour of co-financing is that the Member States are responsible for the measures to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
By also placing a financial responsibility on the Member States, the Commission expects them to do their best in the veterinary and sanitary field to stamp out diseases as quickly as possible and to minimise the costs
By also placing a financial responsibility on the Member States, the Commission expects them to do their best in the veterinary and sanitary field to stamp out diseases as quickly as possible and to minimise the costs.
The Commission’s other argument for submitting this proposal is that that European Court of Auditors, in its Special Report 1/2000
The Commission’s other argument for submitting this proposal is that that European Court of Auditors, in its Special Report 1/2000
The Court of Auditors considers that, if a distinction is drawn, this gives the Member States an incentive to ensure that as much as possible of the costs are financed from exceptional market support measures, where the level of EU funding is highest.
The Court of Auditors considers that, if a distinction is drawn, this gives the Member States an incentive to ensure that as much as possible of the costs are financed from exceptional market support measures, where the level of EU funding is highest.
The Commission’s arguments cannot outweigh the particularly negative consequences which the Commission proposal might have for the Common Agricultural Policy in general and the conditions of competition in European agriculture in particular.
The Commission’s arguments cannot outweigh the particularly negative consequences which the Commission proposal might have for the Common Agricultural Policy in general and the conditions of competition in European agriculture in particular.
The proposal is founded on inadequate grounds, and it does not seem possible to improve it sufficiently by amendments.
The proposal is founded on inadequate grounds, and it does not seem possible to improve it sufficiently by amendments.
The Commission proposal should therefore be rejected in its entirety and the Commission asked to submit a new one.
The Commission proposal should therefore be rejected in its entirety and the Commission asked to submit a new one.
Re-nationalisation of the Common Agricultural Policy…
Re-nationalisation of the Common Agricultural Policy…
The Commission opens the way, with its proposal, for co-financing under the EAGGF Guarantee Section (expenditure area 1A) within the CAP, which – mutatis mutandis – is tantamount to opening the way to the re-nationalisation of the CAP.
The Commission opens the way, with its proposal, for co-financing under the EAGGF Guarantee Section (expenditure area 1A) within the CAP, which – mutatis mutandis – is tantamount to opening the way to the re-nationalisation of the CAP.
The introduction of co-financing would require a new reform of the CAP, which is not realistic at this point, when the latest reform is only in the initial stage of implementation.
The introduction of co-financing would require a new reform of the CAP, which is not realistic at this point, when the latest reform is only in the initial stage of implementation.
A new financing model is also not in line with the agreements concluded in connection with the latest round of enlargement of the EU.
A new financing model is also not in line with the agreements concluded in connection with the latest round of enlargement of the EU.
The Commission proposal would also open up a risk of the increased spread of veterinary diseases and thus reduce the level of protection in the EU.
The Commission proposal would also open up a risk of the increased spread of veterinary diseases and thus reduce the level of protection in the EU.
This could result in the Member States refusing to cooperate, or partly avoiding cooperation, with national co-financing.
This could result in the Member States refusing to cooperate, or partly avoiding cooperation, with national co-financing.
Farmers in one Member State would then risk receiving lower compensation than farmers in other Member States, thus resulting in less effort being put into combatting infectious veterinary diseases, and a concomitant increased risk of their spread.
Farmers in one Member State would then risk receiving lower compensation than farmers in other Member States, thus resulting in less effort being put into combating infectious veterinary diseases, and a concomitant increased risk of their spread.
…and significantly different conditions of competition
…and significantly different conditions of competition
The most important argument against co-financing under the Guarantee Section is that it would mean European farmers being exposed to significantly different market conditions.
The most important argument against co-financing under the Guarantee Section is that it would mean European farmers being exposed to significantly different market conditions.
That also means the end, in practice, of the CAP.
That also means the end, in practice, of the CAP.
This is an argument the Commission itself uses.
This is an argument the Commission itself uses.
One essential reason for rejecting the Commission proposal in its present form is that national co-financing is an unknown quantity, and it is particularly unclear to what extent the national contribution will be paid from the public purse, from the agriculture sector or via para-fiscal levies.
One essential reason for rejecting the Commission proposal in its present form is that national co-financing is an unknown quantity, and it is particularly unclear to what extent the national contribution will be paid from the public purse, from the agriculture sector or via para-fiscal levies.
It may seem reliable, but is none the less in direct contradiction of the Treaty provisions banning discriminatory treatment on the grounds of nationality.
It may seem reliable, but is none the less in direct contradiction of the Treaty provisions banning discriminatory treatment on the grounds of nationality.
This problem was also raised by the Court of Auditors, which in its 2004 Annual Report writes that the trend in several Member States towards shifting the co-financing costs to the agriculture sector involves the risk of distorting competition between producers in the EU, and that in such cases, in the Court of Auditors’ view, a Community legal basis therefore should be established for such measures.
This problem was also raised by the Court of Auditors, which in its 2004 Annual Report writes that the trend in several Member States towards shifting the co-financing costs to the agriculture sector involves the risk of distorting competition between producers in the EU, and that in such cases, in the Court of Auditors’ view, a Community legal basis therefore should be established for such measures.
Another very important question is to what extent it is in fact legally sustainable to submit a proposal on co-financing within the current Council regulations on market support measures, rather than to submit an amendment to the Financial Regulation, and in particular to the codified Regulation EEC/729/70
Another very important question is to what extent it is in fact legally sustainable to submit a proposal on co-financing within the current Council regulations on market support measures, rather than to submit an amendment to the Financial Regulation, and in particular to the codified Regulation EEC/729/70
Prevention is the first step
Prevention is the first step
The Commission is approaching the problem in totally the wrong way, putting the cart before the horse.
The Commission is approaching the problem in totally the wrong way, putting the cart before the horse.
At European level a number of measures have been taken to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
At European level a number of measures have been taken to combat infectious veterinary diseases.
The Member States are obliged, both legally and morally, to implement these measures, and, as the guardian of the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for ensuring that this implementation takes place in full accordance with the letter and spirit of the legislative text.
The Member States are obliged, both legally and morally, to implement these measures, and, as the guardian of the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for ensuring that this implementation takes place in full accordance with the letter and spirit of the legislative text.
The ANIMO network
The ANIMO network
Another important and very valuable instrument in the prevention phase is the Animo network, a computer-based communications network between the veterinary authorities, the ultimate aim of which is to restrict veterinary checks to the place of origin.
Another important and very valuable instrument in the prevention phase is the Animo network, a computer-based communications network between the veterinary authorities, the ultimate aim of which is to restrict veterinary checks to the place of origin.