natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dr Železný has acknowledged that when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity was presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity on the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
Dr Zelezný has acknowledged that when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity was presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity on the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
The Senate waived the parliamentary immunity of Mr Železný apparently for the same acts as those considered at the present request.
The Senate waived the parliamentary immunity of Mr Zelezný apparently for the same acts as those considered at the present request.
At his appearance, Dr Železný declared that he had been a victim of political harassment and public intimidation for the last six years.
At his appearance, Dr Zelezný declared that he had been a victim of political harassment and public intimidation for the last six years.
He also mentioned two of the cases that the police is currently investigating (the first of them is dealt with in this report).
He also mentioned two of the cases that the police is currently investigating (the first of them is dealt with in this report).
Dr Železný asserts that the three cases are linked (the other two cases are dealt with in two other reports) between them.
Dr Zelezný asserts that the three cases are linked (the other two cases are dealt with in two other reports) between them.
In his written declaration, Dr. Železný points out that the police investigation on him has been purposely protracted for years and years to keep opponents away from fair political competition.
In his written declaration, Dr. Zelezný points out that the police investigation on him has been purposely protracted for years and years to keep opponents away from fair political competition.
Dr. Železný claims also that the cases against him are without ground and artificially perpetuated with a view to damaging his political career.
Dr. Zelezný claims also that the cases against him are without ground and artificially perpetuated with a view to damaging his political career.
The Minister of Justice, in reply to the questions submitted by the Committee on Legal Affairs, explains most of the observations made by Dr Železný and expressed its conviction that the bodies active in criminal proceedings conducted against Dr Železný have acted in accordance with the law and have in no way been influenced by the Government or by its Members.
The Minister of Justice, in reply to the questions submitted by the Committee on Legal Affairs, explains most of the observations made by Dr Zelezný and expressed its conviction that the bodies active in criminal proceedings conducted against Dr Zelezný have acted in accordance with the law and have in no way been influenced by the Government or by its Members.
Dr Železný's case is of a certain intricacy.
Dr Zelezný's case is of a certain intricacy.
Nevertheless, there are certain aspects to the case, as pointed out by Dr Železný ( some disproportionate reaction from the police on his arrest, the rather obscure situation of other main accused, Mr Novotný in the first case presented by the Prague Court, certain police harassment and the length of the proceedings), that have demanded a thorough exam by the committee, but, as said above, the response from the Senate and the explanations from the Minister of Justice make the rapporteur inclined to advise Parliament to waive the immunity of Dr Železný.
Nevertheless, there are certain aspects to the case, as pointed out by Dr Zelezný ( some disproportionate reaction from the police on his arrest, the rather obscure situation of other main accused, Mr Novotný in the first case presented by the Prague Court, certain police harassment and the length of the proceedings), that have demanded a thorough exam by the committee, but, as said above, the response from the Senate and the explanations from the Minister of Justice make the rapporteur inclined to advise Parliament to waive the immunity of Dr Zelezný.
Městské státní zastupitelství v Praze 27.8.2004 16.12.2004
Prague Public Prosecutor 27.8.2004 16.12.2004
JURI 16.12.2004
JURI 16.12.2004
Maria Berger 19.1.2005
Maria Berger 19.1.2005
17 0
17 0
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Daniel Strož, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Daniel Strož, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
PE 362.636v02-00
PE 362.636v02-00
– s ohledem na žádost, aby byl poslanec Vladimír Železný zbaven imunity, kterou pod číslem jednacím KZv 295/2003-243 předložilo dne 27. srpna 2004 Městské státní zastupitelství v Praze a která byla oznámena na plenárním zasedání dne 16. prosince 2004,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Vladimír Železný in file number KZv 295/2003-243, forwarded by Prague Public Prosecutor on 27 August 2004, and announced in plenary sitting on 16 December 2004,
– s ohledem na čl.
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0291/2005 ),
At the sitting of 16 December 2004, the President of the Parliament informed the House that he had received a letter from the Prague Public Prosecutor requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Dr Vladimír Železný in respect of file number KZv 295/2003-243 of the Register of the Prosecuting Attorney Office.
At the sitting of 16 December 2004, the President of the Parliament informed the House that he had received a letter from the Prague Public Prosecutor requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Dr Vladimir Zelezný in respect of file number KZv 295/2003-243 of the Register of the Prosecuting Attorney Office.
The Metropolitan Prosecuting Attorney's Office is requesting the waiver of parliamentary immunity in respect of the above-mentioned file on the ground that Dr Železný is believed to have committed acts constituting evasion of taxes, duties and other contributions under Section 148(1) and (3) of the Criminal Code up to 31 December 1997 and to had acted as an accomplice under Section 9(2) of the Criminal Code.
The Metropolitan Prosecuting Attorney's Office is requesting the waiver of parliamentary immunity in respect of the above-mentioned file on the ground that Dr Zelezný is believed to have committed acts constituting evasion of taxes, duties and other contributions under Section 148(1) and (3) of the Criminal Code up to 31 December 1997 and to had acted as an accomplice under Section 9(2) of the Criminal Code.
The investigation is being carried out by the corruption and financial crime unit of the criminal police.
The investigation is being carried out by the corruption and financial crime unit of the criminal police.
The Prague Public Prosecutor's Office, which is charged with the supervision of the pre-trial proceedings, is requesting that Dr. Železný's immunity be waived.
The Prague Public Prosecutor's Office, which is charged with the supervision of the pre-trial proceedings, is requesting that Dr. Zelesný's immunity be waived.
The application from the Prosecutor's Office explains in detail the charges brought by the police against Dr Železný ( Notice to Members 2/2005).
The application from the Prosecutor's Office explains in detail the charges brought by the police against Dr. Zelezný ( Notice to Members 2/2005).
It is stressed by the Prosecutor that, in November 2003, during the course of the criminal proceedings, Dr Železný was elected Senator .
It is stressed by the Prosecutor that, in November 2003, during the course of the criminal proceedings, Dr Zelezný was elected Senator .
At the request of the Police authority, the Senate voted on 23 January 2003 to waive Dr. Železný's immunity and agreed to criminal proceedings against the Member.
At the request of the Police authority, the Senate voted on 23 January 2003 to waive Dr. Zelezný's immunity and agreed to criminal proceedings against the Member.
Pursuant to Rule 7(3) of the Rules of Procedure, Dr Železný was heard by the Committee on Legal Affairs.
Pursuant to Rule 7(3) of the Rules of Procedure, Dr Zelezny was heard by the Committee on Legal Affairs.
At this hearing Dr Železný informed the committee of his views on the situation in his country with respect to him.
At this hearing Dr Zelezny informed the committee of his views on the situation in his country with respect to him.
Dr. Železný has acknowledged that when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity was presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity on the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
Dr. Zelezný has acknowledged that when he was Senator, a request to waive his parliamentary immunity was presented by the police and that he asked the Senate to waive his immunity on the hope that it would accelerate the investigation procedure.
In his written declaration, Dr Železný points out that the police investigation on him has been purposely protracted for years and years to keep opponents away from fair political competition.
In his written declaration, Dr Zelezný points out that the police investigation on him has been purposely protracted for years and years to keep opponents away from fair political competition.
Dr Železný claims also that the cases against him are without ground and artificially perpetuated with a view to damaging his political career.
Dr Zelezný claims also that the cases against him are without ground and artificially perpetuated with a view to damaging his political career.
Nevertheless, there are certain aspects to the case, as pointed out by Dr Železný (some disproportionate reaction from the police on his arrest, the rather obscure situation of other main accused, Mr Novotný in the first case brought before the Prague Court, certain police harassment and the length of the proceedings), that have demanded a thorough exam by the committee, but, as said above, the response from the Senate and the explanations from the Minister of Justice make the rapporteur inclined to advise Parliament to waive the immunity of Dr Železný.
Nevertheless, there are certain aspects to the case, as pointed out by Dr Zelezný (some disproportionate reaction from the police on his arrest, the rather obscure situation of other main accused, Mr Novotný in the first case brought before the Prague Court, certain police harassment and the length of the proceedings), that have demanded a thorough exam by the committee, but, as said above, the response from the Senate and the explanations from the Minister of Justice make the rapporteur inclined to advise Parliament to waive the immunity of Dr Zelezný.
In the light of the above considerations, pursuant Rule 7(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, after having considered the arguments for and against waiving immunity, the JURI recommends that the EP waive Mr Vladimír Železný's parliamentary immunity, subject to the condition that the waiver of immunity shall apply solely to the prosecution proceedings and that, until such time as final sentence is given, Dr Železný must be immune from any form of detention or remand or any other measure which prevents him from performing the duties attaching to his mandate as a Member of the European Parliament.
In the light of the above considerations, pursuant Rule 7(1) and (2) of the Rules of Procedure, after having considered the arguments for and against waiving immunity, the JURI recommends that the EP waive Mr Vladimir Zelezný's parliamentary immunity, subject to the condition that the waiver of immunity shall apply solely to the prosecution proceedings and that, until such time as final sentence is given, Dr Zelesný must be immune from any form of detention or remand or any other measure which prevents him from performing the duties attaching to his mandate as a Member of the European Parliament.
17 0 0
17 0 0
PE 357.843v03-00
PE v03-00
STANOVISKO Výboru pro rozvoj ...............................................................................15
OPINION of the Committee on Development ......................................................16
- s ohledem na šestou výroční zprávu Rady přijatou dne 11. listopadu 2004
- having regard to the Council’s Sixth Annual Report adopted on 11 November 2004
- s ohledem na aktualizovaný text Uživatelské příručky ke Kodexu Evropské unie o vývozu zbraní, o němž rozhodla pracovní skupina Rady pro vývoz konvenčních zbraní (COARM) dne 23. prosince 2004
- having regard to the updated User's Guide to the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, as agreed by the Council Working Party on Conventional Arms Exports (COARM) on 23 December 2004
Rada Evropské unie 16133/1/04, 23.12.2004, s. 1. ,
Council of the European Union 16133/1/04, 23.12.2004, p.
- s ohledem na společný vojenský seznam Evropské unie (vybavení, na které se vztahuje Kodex Evropské unie o vývozu zbraní) přijatý Radou dne 25. dubna 2005
- having regard to the Common Military List of the European Union (equipment covered by the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports) adopted by the Council on 25 April 2005
Úř věst.
OJ C 127, 25.5.2005, p.
- s ohledem na společnou akci Rady ze dne 12. července 2002 o příspěvku Evropské unie k boji proti destabilizujícímu hromadění a šíření ručních palných a lehkých zbraní (2002/589/SZBP)
- having regard to the Council Joint Action of 12 July 2002 on the European Union’s contribution to combating the destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons (2002/589/CFSP)
- s ohledem na program EU pro prevenci a potírání nedovoleného obchodu s konvenčními zbraněmi z roku 1997,
- having regard to the 1997 EU Programme for Preventing and Combating Illicit Trafficking in Conventional Arms,
- s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES) č. 1504/2004 ze dne 19. července 2004, kterým se mění a aktualizuje nařízení (ES) č. 1334/2000, kterým se zavádí režim Společenství pro kontrolu vývozu zboží a technologií dvojího užití
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1504/2004 of 19 July 2004 amending and updating Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology
- s ohledem na Wassenaarské ujednání o kontrole vývozu konvenčních zbraní a zboží a technologií dvojího užití,
- having regard to the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies,
- s ohledem na evropskou bezpečnostní strategii přijatou Radou dne 12. prosince 2003,
- having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the Council on 12 December 2003,
– s ohledem na Minimální standardní zásady OSN pro zacházení s vězni
- having regard to the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners
Standardní minimální zásady pro zacházení s vězni byly přijaty Prvním kongresem OSN o prevenci kriminality a zacházení s pachateli konaným v Ženevě v roce 1955 a byly schváleny usneseními Ekonomické a sociální rady č. 663 C (XXIV) ze dne 31. července 1957 a č. 2076 (LXII) ze dne 13. května 1977 ,
Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, adopted by the First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, held at Geneva in 1955, and approved by the Economic and Social Council by its resolution 663 C (XXIV) of 31 July 1957 and 2076 (LXII) of 13 May 1977. ,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 17. listopadu 2004 o páté výroční zprávě podle bodu 8 vlastního textu Kodexu Evropské unie o vývozu zbraní
- having regard to its resolution of 17 November 2004 on the Council's Fifth Annual Report according to Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports
- s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 3. července 2003 o obchodu s dětmi a dětskými vojáky
- having regard to its resolution of 3 July 2003 on trafficking in children and child soldiers
- s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 26. května 2005 o ručních a lehkých zbraních
- having regard to its resolution of 26 May 2005 on small arms and light weapons
- s ohledem na svá usnesení o zachování embarga EU na prodej zbraní do Číny a zejména na své usnesení ze dne 18. prosince 2003
- having regard to its resolutions on the non-removal of the EU embargo on arms sales to China, and in particular its resolution of 18 December 2003
- s ohledem na na svá výroční usnesení o stavu lidských práv ve světě a politice EU v této oblasti, zejména na své usnesení ze dne 22. dubna 2004
- having regard to its annual resolutions on human rights in the world and the European Union's policy on the matter, and in particular its resolution of 22 April 2004
– s ohledem na článek 17 Smlouvy o EU a článek 296 Smlouvy o ES,
- having regard to Article 17 of the EU Treaty and Article 296 of the EC Treaty,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zahraniční věci a na stanovisko Výboru pro rozvoj ( A6‑0292/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6-0292/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že ačkoli nynější výroční hodnocení Kodexu EU o vývozu zbraní pomůže zlepšit kontrolu vývozu zbraní z EU, je stále třeba přijmout další opatření,
A. whereas although the recent year-long review of the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports will serve to strengthen EU export controls, there are still further measures to be undertaken,
B. vzhledem k tomu, Evropská unie by s ohledem na hrozby načrtnuté v evropské bezpečnostní strategii měla vyvinout veškerou snahu, aby jednala – a byla nazírána – jako zodpovědný globální aktér stojící v popředí úsilí o boj proti šíření zbraní, o posílení globálního odzbrojení a o rozvoj kontrol nad transfery zbraní,
B. whereas the European Union, in light of the threats outlined in the European Security Strategy, should make every effort to act, and be seen as acting, as a responsible global actor at the forefront of efforts to combat proliferation, foster global disarmament and develop arms transfer controls,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že je pravděpodobné, že se kodex EU změní ve společný postoj, což bude významným krokem kupředu v jeho vývoji, neboť členské státy budou muset uvést své vnitrostátní právní předpisy v soulad s normami stanovenými kodexem, a vzhledem k tomu, že COREPER tedy dospěl dne 30. června 2005 k dohodě o revidovaném kodexu (který bude přijat ve formě společného postoje) ve správný okamžik,
C. whereas the transformation of the EU Code of Conduct into a Common Position appears likely, which would be a significant step forward in the development of the Code, requiring Member States to align their national legislation with the standards set by the EU Code, and whereas, to that end, COREPER on 30 June 2005 reached agreement on a revised Code of Conduct (to be adopted in the form of a Common Position) at the appropriate juncture,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že ačkoli se kontrola vývozu zbraní nadále vyvíjí pozitivním směrem – sílí například podpora případné smlouvy o obchodu se zbraněmi – potřebuje tento vývoj nadále plnou podporu EU, a vzhledem k tomu, že za tímto účelem plně podporuje závěry Rady ze dne 3. října 2005, které vyjadřují podporu EU myšlence mezinárodní smlouvy o obchodu se zbraněmi,
D. whereas although developments in arms transfer controls continue to move forward, for example increased support towards the Arms Trade Treaty, such developments continue to require the full support of the EU, and whereas, to that end, full backing is given to the Council conclusions dated 3 October 2005 stating EU support for the principle of an international treaty on arms trade,
E. vzhledem k tomu, že v důsledku násilí s použitím ručních palných zbraní každoročně zemře okolo půl milionu lidí, ať již při ozbrojených konfliktech, nebo v souvislosti se zločinností,
E. whereas every year some half a million people die as a result of small-arms violence, both in the course of armed conflicts and in connection with crime,
F. přesvědčen, že rozvinutí a uplatňování harmonizované evropské politiky kontroly vývozu zbraní by rozhodujícím způsobem přispělo k prohloubení společné zahraniční a bezpečnostní politiky Unie,
F. convinced that the development and implementation of a harmonised European arms export control policy would contribute decisively to a deepening of the Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy,
G. přesvědčen, že jakákoli politika kontroly vývozu zbraní EU musí posilovat a doplňovat ostatní rozměry vnější činnosti Unie, mezi něž patří cíle udržitelného rozvoje, předcházení krizím a podpory lidských práv,
G .convinced that any EU arms export control policy must reinforce and complement the other dimensions of the Union's external action, which include the goals of sustainable development, crisis prevention and promotion of human rights,
1. vítá šestou výroční zprávu Rady a opět klade důraz na význam každoročních hodnocení podle bodu 8 vlastního textu kodexu jako hlavního mechanismu jeho hodnocení a posilování;
Welcomes the Council's Sixth Annual Report and reiterates the importance of annual reviews, as prescribed by Operative Provision 8 of the Code, as the main mechanism for reviewing and strengthening the Code;
4. opakuje, že je nutné zlepšit notifikační systém zamítnutí, jemuž se hodnocení nevěnovalo; vyzývá k intenzivnější výměně informací ohledně dvojstranných konzultací o zamítnutí a k častějším mnohostranným konzultacím o zamítnutí v celé EU;
Reaffirms the need to improve the denial notification system that was not addressed by the review; calls again for greater exchange of information on bilateral consultation on denials and for greater use of multilateral EU-wide consultation on denials;
6. vyzývá k ustavení evropského dialogu mezi vedoucími představiteli orgánů členských států udělujících licence s ohledem na hodnocení situace Evropským situačním střediskem;
Calls for the establishment of a European dialogue between the leaders of the authorising bodies of the Member States, taking into account the situation assessments by the European Situation Centre;
Společný postoj
Common Position
8. má za to, že jasná, účinná a harmonizovaná společná politika kontroly vývozu zbraní, zakotvená v právně závazném kodexu, může sehrát rozhodující úlohu v boji proti terorismu, v předcházení konfliktům, v podpoře regionální stability a v podpoře lidských práv;
Considers that a clear, efficient and harmonised common arms control export policy, anchored in a legally binding Code of Conduct, can play a decisive role in the fight against terrorism, conflict prevention, regional stability and the promotion of human rights;
10. považuje za důležité, aby členské státy měly možnost provádět vzájemné konzultace o vydávání licencí na vývoz do zemí, u nichž bylo zrušeno emgargo; rovněž vyzývá k tomu, aby obsah a výsledky konzultací byly vždy poskytovány všem členských státům;
Regards it as important that Member States should have the opportunity to consult each other on the licences issued for exports to post-embargoed states; additionally calls for the substance and outcomes of consultations to be circulated to all Member States;
Rovná kritéria
Equal criteria
L 159, 30.6.2000, s. 1.
OJ L 159, 30.6.2000, p.1.
Nařízení naposledy pozměněno nařízením (ES) č. 1504/2004. ; naléhavě vyzývá k dalšímu zlepšování ještě před přijetím nového kodexu, například k uplatňování kritéria lidských práv, které se nesmí omezovat jen na posuzování, zda je země připravena dodržovat mezinárodní pravidla vedení války; a do doby, než se kodex stane právně závazným, volá po jeho větší závaznosti politické;
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1504/2004. ; urges further improvements before the new Code is adopted, such as the implementation of a human rights criterion, which must not be confined to considering whether a country is prepared to respect the international rules of war, and calls for it to be more politically binding until such time as it becomes legally binding;
Osvědčené postupy pro výklad kritérií
Best practices for interpretation of criteria
Národní vykazovací postupy
National reporting procedures