natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mezi pěti typy poskytovaných služeb umožňuje veřejná regulovaná služba jednotlivým státům sladit potřeby samosprávy a jednoty.
Among the five types of services on offer, the public regulated service allows States to reconcile the needs of autonomy and unity.
Zůstává nicméně několik nevyřešených otázek.
However, there are number of outstanding issues.
Váš zpravodaj by se tudíž rád zabýval některými obecnými aspekty programu Galileo, kterých se Komise ve svém návrhu dotýká jen nepřímo.
Your draftsman would therefore also like to examine certain general aspects of the Galileo programme which are only touched on indirectly in this Commission proposal.
Pokud jde o koncesi, je třeba urychlit postup jejího udělení a zbytečně neprodlužovat lhůty a formality, jimiž se kandidáti musí zbytečně řídit a které s sebou nesou vysoké náklady a riziko, že případní uchazeči budou nakonec z veřejné soutěže nuceni vystoupit.
As far as the concession is concerned, it is important to speed up the procedure and not extend the deadlines and formalities imposed on candidates unnecessarily as these deadlines and formalities generate substantial costs, with the risk that potential bidders may ultimately be forced to withdraw.
Pokud jde o financování, bylo by dobré za účelem zvýšení viditelnosti a možnosti zpětného vysledování investic postupně pro tento projekt vytvořit samostatnou rozpočtovou položku.
As far as the financing is concerned, in order to enhance the visibility and traceability of investments, it would be a good idea to phase in a specific budget line for the project.
Je třeba vyjasnit, jak postupovat v plánovacím období 2007–2013.
The programming period 2007- 2013 needs to be clarified.
Považujeme za žádoucí převést přenos informací, pro který je Galileo klíčovým médiem, plně do působnosti Výboru pro dopravu, zejména proto, že dobrá správa informací přináší úspory a racionalizuje pohyb osob a zboží.
In our view, information delivery, for which Galileo is a crucial medium, should be brought within the terms of reference of the Transport Committee, particularly since sound management of information economises on or streamlines flows of people and goods.
Pokud jde o podmínky koncesní smlouvy, tak vzhledem k tomu, že koncesní smlouva je smlouvou na dobu určitou, je třeba najít způsob, jak zaručit, že s jejím přibližujícím se koncem zůstane úroveň investic potřebných k modernizaci technologie dostatečná k zachování služby, a zajistit vyhlášení nového výběrového řízení za odpovídajících podmínek.
When it comes to the terms of the concession contract, given that the concession contract has a specified duration, it is important to find a way of guaranteeing that as the contract nears its end, the level of investment required to update the technology is adequate to maintain the service and ensure a new invitation to tender under appropriate conditions.
Podobně zůstává otevřeno, co se stane s duševním vlastnictvím, původně vneseným do společného podniku Unií, po uplynutí koncesní smlouvy.
Similarly there is the question of what will happen to the intellectual property - originally transferred by the Union to the joint undertaking - at the end of the concession contract.
Váš zpravodaj tedy navrhuje několik pozměňovacích návrhů týkajících se podmínek koncesní smlouvy, která by měla za jistých podmínek obsahovat mechanismus úhrady částky, kterou přispěje Společenství.
Your draftsman therefore proposes a number of amendments relating to the terms and conditions of the concession contract, which should include a mechanism for repaying the Community contribution in certain circumstances.
Pro zajištění ekonomické životaschopnosti držitele koncese je rovněž třeba, aby smlouva stanovila, že držitel koncese bude získávat výnosy z licencí a z práv na duševní vlastnictví.
So as to ensure economic viability for the concessionaire, is also important is that the contract should stipulate that the concessionaire receives the revenue from licenses and intellectual property rights.
Předložená skupina pozměňovacích návrhů má jasně ukázat, že evropská politika družicové radionavigace je v současnosti uskutečňována programy Galileo i EGNOS, což je uvedeno v nařízení Rady (ES) č. 1321/2004 ze dne 12. července 2004 o zřízení řídících struktur pro evropské družicové radionavigační programy.
A series of amendments has been tabled to make it clear that European satellite radio-navigation policy is currently being implemented under both the Galileo and EGNOS programmes, as reflected in Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 of 12 July 2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes.
Je důležité jasně ukázat, že se družicová radionavigace neomezuje pouze na program Galileo.
It is important to make it clear that satellite radio-navigation is not confined to Galileo.
Výbor pro dopravu a cestovní ruch vyzývá Výbor pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku jako příslušný výbor, aby do své zprávy začlenil tyto pozměňovací návrhy:
The Committee on Transport and Tourism calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(-1) Evropská politika družicové radionavigace je v současnosti uskutečňována prostřednictvím programů Galileo a EGNOS.
(-1) European satellite radio-navigation policy is currently implemented through the Galileo and EGNOS programmes.
Je vhodné učinit odkaz na evropské programy družicové radionavigace, a ne pouze na program Galileo.
Reference should be made to other European satellite radio navigation programmes, not just to Galileo.
Návrh nařízení se týká všech opatření Evropské unie v oblasti družicové radionavigace, které jsou v současnosti uskutečňovány prostřednictvím programů Galileo a EGNOS.
The proposal for a regulation covers all measures taken by the European Union in the satellite radionavigation sphere, which are currently implemented through the Galileo and EGNOS programmes.
(1a) Zřizování této infrastruktury družicové radionavigace je projektem, který zřetelně přesahuje technické a finanční možnosti jakéhokoli členského státu jednajícího samostatně.
(1a) Establishing this satellite radio-navigation infrastructure is a project which clearly exceeds the technical and financial capabilities of any Member State acting alone.
Galileo tedy plně odpovídá požadavkům zásady subsidiarity, protože úroveň Společenství je tou nejvhodnější; jedná se o příklad přidané hodnoty, kterou může přinést sjednocená Evropa, když jasně stanoví své cíle a prostředky.
Galileo thus corresponds perfectly to the requirements of the subsidiarity principle because the Community level is the most appropriate; this is an example of the value added that Europe can generate when it has clearly defined its objectives and resources.
(1b) EGNOS je programem, který má zkvalitnit signály amerického systému GPS a ruského systému Glonass, a zajistit tak jejich spolehlivost na velkém geografickém území.
(1b) EGNOS is a programme aimed at augmenting the American GPS and Russian GLONASS signals for reliability purposes on a broad geographical area.
Je nezávislý na programu Galileo a doplňuje jej.
It is independent from and complementary to Galileo.
Aby se zachoval soulad se zněním citovaného nařízení Rady, měl by být Úřad pro dohled označován jako „Úřad pro dohled“ namísto „Úřad pro dohled nad GNSS“.
To remain consistent with the wording of the quoted Council Regulation, the SA should be refered to as Supervisory Authority instead of GNSS Supervisory Authority.
Označování „Úřad pro dohled nad GNSS“ by navíc mohlo vést k nedorozumění ohledně rozsahu působnosti Úřadu pro dohled.
On top of that the GNSS Supervisory Authority reference could lead to misunderstandings related to the scope of the SA.
Do působnosti Evropského úřadu pro dohled nad GNSS spadají evropské segmenty, a to by se mělo bedlivě reflektovat.
The European GNSS Supervisory Authority has a scope over the European segments, and that should be carefully reflected
(12) V důsledku toho je třeba stanovit zatížení rozpočtu Společenství částkou jedné miliardy eur na financování zaváděcí a provozní fáze programu Galileo v období od roku 2007 do roku 2013.
(12) It is therefore necessary to foresee a sum of €1 billion from the Community budget to finance the deployment and the commercial operating phases of GALILEO for the period 2007-2013.
(12) V důsledku toho je třeba stanovit zatížení rozpočtu Společenství částkou jedné miliardy eur na financování zaváděcí a provozní fáze evropských programů družicové radionavigace v období od roku 2007 do roku 2013.
(12) It is therefore necessary to foresee a sum of €1 billion from the Community budget to finance the deployment and the commercial operating phases of European satellite radio-navigation programmes for the period 2007-2013.
Návrh nařízení se týká všech akcí Evropské unie v oblasti družicové radionavigace, které jsou v současnosti uskutečňovány prostřednictvím programů Galileo a EGNOS.
The proposal for a regulation covers all measures taken by the European Union in the satellite radionavigation sphere, which are currently implemented through the Galileo and EGNOS programmes.
(12a) Tento časově omezený finanční příspěvek z veřejných zdrojů nezbavuje soukromý sektor odpovědnosti za financování zaváděcí a provozní fáze.
(12a) This financial contribution from the public sector, which is for a limited period, does not exempt the private sector from its responsibility for funding the deployment and commercial operating phases.
(12b) Koncesní smlouva obsahuje mechanismus vrácení částky, kterou přispělo Společenství, poskytnuté na realizaci zaváděcí a provozní fáze, pokud příjmy držitele koncese překročí stanovenou hranici.
(12b) The concession contract provides for a mechanism for repayment of the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases if the revenue generated by the concessionaire exceeds a certain threshold.
Viz pozměňovací návrh k článku 3.
See amendment to Article 3.
Bod odůvodnění 12c (nový)
Recital 12 c (new)
(12c) Koncesní smlouva rovněž počítá s tím, že držitel koncese může pobírat příjmy plynoucí z licencí a z práva na duševní vlastnictví k jednotlivým složkám systému, jejichž vlastníkem zůstává Úřad pro dohled.
(12c) The concession contract also provides for the concessionaire to receive the revenue from licences and intellectual property rights for system components, ownership of which rests with the Supervisory Authority.
Toto nařízení stanoví postupy pro finanční příspěvek Společenství na realizaci zaváděcí fáze a provozní fáze evropského programu družicové radionavigace Galileo , dále nazývaného „program“.
The present Regulation defines the modalities of the financial contribution of the Community for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radionavigation GALILEO, hereafter entitled “ programme ”.
Toto nařízení stanoví postupy pro finanční příspěvek Společenství na realizaci zaváděcí fáze a provozní fáze evropských programů družicové radionavigace (GNSS) , dále nazývaných „programy“.
The present Regulation defines the modalities of the financial contribution of the Community for the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European satellite radionavigation programmes (GNSS), hereafter entitled “programm es”.
Článek 2, úvodní část
Article 2, introductory part
(b) první série činností spojených se spuštěním provozní fáze, která zahrnuje správu infrastruktury tvořené družicemi a pozemními stanicemi spojenými s jejich fungováním a údržbu a trvalé vylepšování tohoto systému.
(b) the first series of activities related to the launch of the commercial operating phase, covering the management of the infrastructure composed by satellites and the associated ground stations, as well as the maintenance and updating of the system.
b) první série činností spojených se spuštěním provozní fáze, která zahrnuje, je-li to nezbytné a je-li to v souladu s ustanoveními koncesní smlouvy , správu infrastruktury tvořené družicemi a pozemními stanicemi spojenými s jejich fungováním a údržbu a trvalé vylepšování tohoto systému.
(b) the first series of activities related to the launch of the commercial operating phase, covering , if necessary and in accordance with the terms of the concession contract, the management of the infrastructure composed by satellites and the associated ground stations, as well as the maintenance and updating of the system.
Tato výhrada zabraňuje obejití koncesní smlouvy.
This proviso avoids pre-empting the concession contract.
Koncesní smlouva zejména stanoví:
The concession contract shall provide, inter alia , for:
- mechanismus vrácení částky, kterou přispěje Společenství, poskytnuté na realizaci zaváděcí a provozní fáze, pokud příjmy držitele koncese překročí stanovenou hranici;
- a mechanism for repaying the Community contribution to the deployment and commercial operating phases if the revenue generated by the concessionaire exceeds a certain threshold;
- držitel koncese může pobírat příjmy pocházející z licencí a z práva na duševní vlastnictví k jednotlivým složkám systému, jejichž vlastníkem zůstává Úřad pro dohled.
- the receipt by the concessionaire of revenue from licences and the exploitation of intellectual property rights in system components ownership of which shall remain with the Supervisory Authority.
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o realizaci zaváděcí fáze a provozní fáze evropského programu družicové radionavigace
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European programme of satellite radionavigation
TRAN 16.11.2004
TRAN 16.11.2004
Patrick Louis 16.11.2004
Patrick Louis 16.11.2004
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Fernand Le Rachinel, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Fernand Le Rachinel, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Roberts Zīle
2 a článek 156 Smlouvy o ES
Articles 251(2) and 156 EC
ITRE 16.11.2004
ITRE 16.11.2004
CONT 25.5.2005
CONT 25.5.2005
Etelka Barsi-Pataky 24.11.2004
Etelka Barsi-Pataky 24.11.2004
BUDG 15.6.2005
BUDG 15.6.2005
Konzultace s Evropským hospodářským a sociálním výborem Datum rozhodnutí na zasedáná
European Economic and Social Committee consulted Date of decision in plenary
Konzultace s Výborem regionů Datum rozohdnutí na zasedání
Committee of the Regions consulted Date of decision in plenary
Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Pia Elda Locatelli, Nils Lundgren, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Pia Elda Locatelli, Nils Lundgren, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
o žádosti týkající se zbavení pana Ashleyho Mota imunity
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Ashley Mote
PE 359.886v02-00
PE 359.886v02-00
NÁVRH ROZHODNUTÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU
PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
– s ohledem na rozsudky Soudního dvora Evropských společenství ze dne 12. května 1964 a 10. července 1986
- having regard to the judgments of 12 May 1964 and 10 July 1986
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro právní záležitosti ( A6‑0213/2005 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0213/2005 ),
Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules of Procedure, the President of Parliament informed the House at its sitting of 23 February 2005 that the UK Permanent Representative has submitted an Application with a view to request the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Mr Ashley Mote.
Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules of Procedure, the President of Parliament informed the House at its sitting of 23 February 2005 that the UK Permanent Representative has submitted an Application with a view to request the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Mr Ashley Mote.
The application ( suplicatoire ) was submitted by the UK representative for Her Majesty's Attorney General.
The application ( suplicatoire ) was submitted by the UK representative for Her Majesty's Attorney General.
Rule 7 (7) allows the competent committee to consider the admissibility of the request and on whether the national authority requesting the waiver is the competent authority.
Rule 7 (7) allows the competent committee to consider the admissibility of the request and on whether the national authority requesting the waiver is the competent authority.
There is no doubt thus that the suplicatoire has been properly submitted.
There is no doubt thus that the suplicatoire has been properly submitted.
The facts
The facts
Mr Mote has been indicted in relation to the wrongful payment of welfare benefits.
Mr Mote has been indicted in relation to the wrongful payment of welfare benefits.
This relates to matters some years before Mr Mote's election to Parliament, between February 1996 and September 2002.
This relates to matters some years before Mr Mote's election to Parliament, between February 1996 and September 2002.
During that time Mr Mote received from various government agencies (point 6 and 26 of the Application and Points 3 to 9 of Annex 1 - the Prosecution Case Summary -) 105.699 Euro of benefit money.
During that time Mr Mote received from various government agencies (point 6 and 26 of the Application and Points 3 to 9 of Annex 1 - the Prosecution Case Summary -) 105.699 Euro of benefit money.
The Prosecutor alleges that Mr Mote was dishonest in his applications for benefits in that he failed to declare his business interest in four companies (point 6 of the Application and point 41 to 45 of Annex 2).
The Prosecutor alleges that Mr Mote was dishonest in his applications for benefits in that he failed to declare his business interest in four companies (point 6 of the Application and point 41 to 45 of Annex 2).
The prosecution's case is that Mr Mote lied in his application form and review form for Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit.
The prosecution's case is that Mr Mote lied in his application form and review form for Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit.
He received for years these benefits without declaring his involvement in various businesses, assets and incomes (points 41, 42, 43, 44 of Annex 2).
He received for years these benefits without declaring his involvement in various businesses, assets and incomes (points 41, 42, 43, 44 of Annex 2).
The prosecutor's case is very well substantiated (points 15 onwards of Annex 2).
The prosecutor's case is very well substantiated (points 15 onwards of Annex 2).
Mr Mote would risk a sentence of imprisonment for a period of between 18 months and 3 years if found guilty (see point 28 of the Application).
Mr Mote would risk a sentence of imprisonment for a period of between 18 months and 3 years if found guilty (see point 28 of the Application).
The Prosecutor has emphasised the seriousness with which fraud is viewed in the UK.
The Prosecutor has emphasised the seriousness with which fraud is viewed in the UK.
It is also the case in most other Member States of the Union.
It is also the case in most other Member States of the Union.
The Prosecutor also mentions that Mr Mote's political views or responsibilities in no way influence the prosecution and that the investigations were conducted as expeditiously as possible.
The Prosecutor also mentions that Mr Mote's political views or responsibilities in no way influence the prosecution and that the investigations were conducted as expeditiously as possible.
There is no ground to doubt these affirmations.
There is no ground to doubt these affirmations.
The prosecutions seem well engaged.
The prosecutions seem well engaged.
The Prosecutor emphasised that a Member of the UK Parliament would be liable for prosecution in the same circumstances as in the current case (point 32 of the Application and 28 of the Annex 4).
The Prosecutor emphasised that a Member of the UK Parliament would be liable for prosecution in the same circumstances as in the current case (point 32 of the Application and 28 of the Annex 4).
Her Majesty's Attorney requests to the EP:
Her Majesty's Attorney requests to the EP:
a) To confirm that the prosecution against Mr Mote may proceed in accordance with the Protocol, in particular Article 8,
a) To confirm that the prosecution against Mr Mote may proceed in accordance with the Protocol, in particular Article 8,
b) that in the event that Mr Mote is held to enjoy any privilege, to waive it so that he may be prosecuted and, if convicted, punished.
b) that in the event that Mr Mote is held to enjoy any privilege, to waive it so that he may be prosecuted and, if convicted, punished.
Mr Mote, argues through his lawyer that he would be protected by immunity as established in Article 8 and 10 second paragraph of the 1965 Protocol (see points 2 and 4 of the Application and point 29 its Annex 4).
Mr Mote, argues through his lawyer that he would be protected by immunity as established in Article 8 and 10 second paragraph of the 1965 Protocol (see points 2 and 4 of the Application and point 29 its Annex 4).
He claims "that the requirement for Mr Mote to attend Court for his trial was incompatible with the free movement of members of the European Parliament under Article 8 of the Protocol."
He claims "that the requirement for Mr Mote to attend Court for his trial was incompatible with the free movement of members of the European Parliament under Article 8 of the Protocol."
This interpretation of Article 8 has made the Court hesitate and compelled it to request the waiving of Mr Mote's immunity in case Parliament considers that it does in fact exist under Article 8.
This interpretation of Article 8 has made the Court hesitate and compelled it to request the waiving of Mr Mote's immunity in case Parliament considers that it does in fact exist under Article 8.
Law, Texts and Principles concerning parliamentary immunity of Members of the EP.
Law, Texts and Principles concerning parliamentary immunity of Members of the EP.