natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A key provision of the Directive is contained in Article 4, which lays down Member States' basic obligations.
A key provision of the Directive is contained in Article 4, which lays down Member States' basic obligations.
Pursuant to Article 4 (1) of the draft Directive, Member States must take the necessary measures to implement RIS on inland waterways.
Pursuant to Article 4 (1) of the draft Directive, Member States must take the necessary measures to implement RIS on inland waterways.
However, there is no obligation on skippers to use the relevant services.
However, there is no obligation on skippers to use the relevant services.
Pursuant to Article 4 (2) RIS services may include a wide range of applications, a common feature of which, however, is the use of modern information technologies.
Pursuant to Article 4 (2) RIS services may include a wide range of applications, a common feature of which, however, is the use of modern information technologies.
Potential applications include, for example:
Potential applications include, for example:
· Fairway information, including geographical, hydrological and also administrative data for skippers and fleet managers.
· Fairway information, including geographical, hydrological and also administrative data for skippers and fleet managers.
This may be dynamic information (e.g. water levels) or static information (e.g. traffic signs) on the conditions on inland waterways.
This may be dynamic information (e.g. water levels) or static information (e.g. traffic signs) on the conditions on inland waterways.
· Traffic information services, which display the vessel and its movements on a part of the waterway (tactical traffic information) or over a larger geographical area (strategic traffic information).
· Traffic information services, which display the vessel and its movements on a part of the waterway (tactical traffic information) or over a larger geographical area (strategic traffic information).
· Traffic management systems to help waterway authorities facilitate navigation and improve the use of infrastructure.
· Traffic management systems to help waterway authorities facilitate navigation and improve the use of infrastructure.
· Information services for accident prevention purposes, which record transport data at the beginning of a trip and update the data during the voyage, so that in the event of an emergency the information can be immediately passed on.
· Information services for accident prevention purposes, which record transport data at the beginning of a trip and update the data during the voyage, so that in the event of an emergency the information can be immediately passed on.
· A whole series of further possible applications in the area of transport management, for example providing information to skippers and fleet managers for transport management purposes or facilitating port and terminal planning by port operators through more accurate estimates of time of arrival.
· A whole series of further possible applications in the area of transport management, for example providing information to skippers and fleet managers for transport management purposes or facilitating port and terminal planning by port operators through more accurate estimates of time of arrival.
· Collection of statistical data for purposes of customs services and waterway charges and port dues.
· Collection of statistical data for purposes of customs services and waterway charges and port dues.
A second key plank of the draft Directive is contained in Article 5 and the related Annex.
A second key plank of the draft Directive is contained in Article 5 and the related Annex.
The framework to be established includes the development of technical requirements and specifications, covering inter alia an electronic chart display system for inland navigation, electronic ship reporting, notices to skippers and tracking and tracing systems.
The framework to be established includes the development of technical requirements and specifications, covering inter alia an electronic chart display system for inland navigation, electronic ship reporting, notices to skippers and tracking and tracing systems.
The Commission lays down provisions in these areas in Annex II.
The Commission lays down provisions in these areas in Annex II.
Under a regulatory committee procedure, technical guidelines and specifications are to be laid down between nine and 15 months after entry into force of the Directive.
Under a regulatory committee procedure, technical guidelines and specifications are to be laid down between nine and 15 months after entry into force of the Directive.
Article 6 refers to the use of satellite positioning technologies for RIS purposes.
Article 6 refers to the use of satellite positioning technologies for RIS purposes.
Your rapporteur welcomes in principle this Commission proposal for a Directive.
Your rapporteur welcomes in principle this Commission proposal for a Directive.
The new technologies referred to here are capable of giving a significant boost to the sector and having a desirable effect, from an economic point of view, on the share of the different modes of transport in overall transport.
The new technologies referred to here are capable of giving a significant boost to the sector and having a desirable effect, from an economic point of view, on the share of the different modes of transport in overall transport.
The positive role that inland waterway transport can, and should, play in European intermodal transport systems has been repeatedly highlighted in the past by the Commission, Council and European Parliament.
The positive role that inland waterway transport can, and should, play in European intermodal transport systems has been repeatedly highlighted in the past by the Commission, Council and European Parliament.
The Commission's comments regarding the need for harmonised, interoperable RIS services in the Community are persuasive.
The Commission's comments regarding the need for harmonised, interoperable RIS services in the Community are persuasive.
It is clear that a European framework needs to be established in this area of significant future potential.
It is clear that a European framework needs to be established in this area of significant future potential.
This should be done speedily so as not to unnecessarily delay the development of this promising area for the deployment of new technologies and so as to prevent the introduction of developments which would later be difficult to correct when seeking to find compatible solutions.
This should be done speedily so as not to unnecessarily delay the development of this promising area for the deployment of new technologies and so as to prevent the introduction of developments which would later be difficult to correct when seeking to find compatible solutions.
Your rapporteur regards the Commission draft Directive as an appropriate framework, which sets out interesting possibilities for the development of RIS services without placing unnecessary constraints on Member States or users.
Your rapporteur regards the Commission draft Directive as an appropriate framework, which sets out interesting possibilities for the development of RIS services without placing unnecessary constraints on Member States or users.
However, a number of amendments are needed:
However, a number of amendments are needed:
· The purpose of amendment 15 is to lay down in the regulatory section that RIS guidelines and technical specifications should take account of, and build on, (preliminary) work carried out in this field by relevant international organisations.
· The purpose of amendment 15 is to lay down in the regulatory section that RIS guidelines and technical specifications should take account of, and build on, (preliminary) work carried out in this field by relevant international organisations.
Amendment 1 introduces a corresponding provision into the recitals.
Amendment 1 introduces a corresponding provision into the recitals.
· Amendments 4 and 5 seek to simplify the scope of the draft Directive.
· Amendments 4 and 5 seek to simplify the scope of the draft Directive.
In addition, the possibility should exist of introducing RIS services voluntarily on waterways which do not fall within the scope of the Directive.
In addition, the possibility should exist of introducing RIS services voluntarily on waterways which do not fall within the scope of the Directive.
· Your rapporteur also feels it is appropriate to move the list of (possible) RIS services from Article 4 and include it under the definition in Article 3(a) (amendments 6 and 9).
· Your rapporteur also feels it is appropriate to move the list of (possible) RIS services from Article 4 and include it under the definition in Article 3(a) (amendments 6 and 9).
That avoids giving the impression that Member States are obligated to implement all eight of the areas referred to.
That avoids giving the impression that Member States are obligated to implement all eight of the areas referred to.
Incorporating the list into Article 3 highlights the fact that these are possibilities.
Incorporating the list into Article 3 highlights the fact that these are possibilities.
· Amendment 13 defines the role of the Member States vis‑à‑vis skippers more precisely, as it has emerged in the course of the rapporteur's discussions that there are fears in some quarters of obligations on skippers which are not laid down in the Directive.
· Amendment 13 defines the role of the Member States vis‑à‑vis skippers more precisely, as it has emerged in the course of the rapporteur's discussions that there are fears in some quarters of obligations on skippers which are not laid down in the Directive.
The proposed new wording stresses that use of RIS services at the private level is not obligatory, but is aspired to.
The proposed new wording stresses that use of RIS services at the private level is not obligatory, but is aspired to.
· In order to ensure consistent legislation in the area of transport, your rapporteur feels that the corresponding wording of Directive 2004/52/EC on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community should be adopted with regard to the use of satellite positioning technologies (amendment 16).
· In order to ensure consistent legislation in the area of transport, your rapporteur feels that the corresponding wording of Directive 2004/52/EC on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community should be adopted with regard to the use of satellite positioning technologies (amendment 16).
· Certain reservations exist regarding the 24‑month deadline (following entry into force of the technical guidelines and specifications) for Member States to comply with the requirements set out in Article 4.
· Certain reservations exist regarding the 24‑month deadline (following entry into force of the technical guidelines and specifications) for Member States to comply with the requirements set out in Article 4.
It is appropriate to extend this period to 36 months (amendment 21).
It is appropriate to extend this period to 36 months (amendment 21).
In the same connection, amendment 23 is intended to make it easier for the Commission to extend this period in further justified cases.
In the same connection, amendment 23 is intended to make it easier for the Commission to extend this period in further justified cases.
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO PRŮMYSL, VÝZKUM A ENERGETIKU
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
pro Výbor pro dopravu a cestovní ruch
for the Committee on Transport and Tourism
k návrhu směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o harmonizovaných informačních službách v oblasti říční dopravy na vnitrozemských cestách ve Společenství
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and Council on harmonised River Traffic Information Services on inland waterways in the Community
Říční doprava po vnitrozemských cestách je inovativní, relativně cenově výhodná forma dopravy, která je poměrně šetrná vůči životnímu prostředí.
Inland waterways are an innovative, comparatively environmentally friendly and relatively cost-efficient mode of transport.
Může hrát významnou roli při zvyšování konkurenceschopnosti v Evropě a posílení jejího udržitelného rozvoje.
They can play a significant role in enhancing Europe's competitiveness and strengthening its sustainable growth.
K tomu je velice nutné sladit technické specifikace a zajistit interoperabilitu služeb.
In order to do so, harmonisation of technical specifications and interoperability of services is highly needed.
Účelem této navržené směrnice je sladit navigační služby říční vnitrozemské dopravy, aby se zajistila slučitelnost a interoperabilita na evropské úrovni a podpořila se přeshraniční říční doprava v Evropě.
This proposed Directive is aimed at harmonising inland river navigation services in order to ensure compatibility and interoperability at European level and to promote cross-border inland waterway transport in Europe.
Výbor pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku tento návrh vítá.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy welcomes the proposal.
Nicméně by rád předložil několik pozměňovacích návrhů, aby:
However, it would like to propose some amendments in order to:
· přiměl členské státy věnovat zvláštní pozornost MSP v průběhu fáze zavádění: směrnice nestanoví soukromým uživatelům povinnost instalovat vybavení potřebné pro zapojení do Informační služby v oblasti říční dopravy (RIS).
· encourage Member States to pay specific attention to SMEs in the implementation phase: The Directive does not oblige private users to install the equipment necessary for participating in the River Information Services (RIS).
Zavazuje však členské státy, aby přijaly příslušná opatření na podporu uživatelů, aby plnili požadované postupy a technické předpoklady na vybavení.
However, it obliges Member States to take appropriate measures to encourage users to comply with the procedures and equipment requirements.
Podle stanoviska navrhovatele by se členské státy měly zvlášť zaměřit na skutečnost, že zaváděcí náklady jsou poměrně vyšší pro MSP.
In the view of the draftsman, the Member States should pay specific attention to the fact that the implementation costs are relatively higher for SMEs.
· se využily znalosti a zkušenosti dotčených stran: směrnice zavádí výbor členských států (výbor RIS), který má být Komisi nápomocen při přípravě pokynů a technických specifikací.
· make use of the knowledge and experience of interested parties: The Directive sets up a Member States´ committee (RIS Committee) to assist the Commission in formulating the guidelines and technical specifications.
Vzhledem k tomu, že se jedná o velice technickou záležitost a vzhledem k tomu, že většina podporovaných služeb se již využívá v průmyslovém sektoru, bylo by vhodné využít znalostí a zkušeností, které v oblasti RIS již dříve získal průmyslový sektor nebo různé organizace, a podělit se o ně s členy výboru RIS.
Since this is a very technical matter and since most of the supported services are already used by industry, it would be advisable to make use of the knowledge and experience that industry and organisations have already gained with RIS and to make it available to the members of the RIS Committee.
Výbor pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku vyzývá Výbor pro dopravu a cestovní ruch jako příslušný výbor, aby do své zprávy začlenil tyto pozměňovací návrhy:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Dosud nezveřejněné v Úř.věst.
Not yet published in OJ.
(6a) Je odpovědností členských států podporovat uživatele, aby plnili požadované postupy a požadavky na vybavení.
(6a) It is the responsibility of Member States to encourage users to comply with the procedures and equipment requirements.
Zvláštní pozornost by se měla věnovat skutečnosti, že zaváděcí náklady jsou poměrně vyšší pro MSP.
Specific attention should be paid to the fact that the implementation costs are relatively higher for SMEs.
Vzhledem ke skutečnosti, že zavádění bude mít neúměrně vysoký finanční dopad na MSP, členské státy by měly věnovat zvláštní pozornost jejich potřebám.
Due to the fact that implementation will induce a disproportionate burden on SMEs, the Member States should pay particular attention to their needs.
(9a) Rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES stanoví, že výbor „se skládá ze zástupců členských států“, nestanoví však, kdo by tito zástupci měli být, jaká by měla být role Komise při zajišťování šíření informací a při zajišťování konzultací s dotčenými stranami.
(9a) Decision 1999/468/EC states that committees will be "composed of the representatives of the Member States", yet it does not specify who the representatives should be, or what the role of the Commission should be in ensuring diffusion of information and consultation with interested parties.
Konzultace se všemi dotčenými stranami, včetně průmyslového sektoru, je nezbytná, aby se zpřístupnily veškeré postoje a doporučení výše uvedeným výborům.
Consultation with all interested parties, including industry, is necessary so that all views and advice are made available to the said committees.
Pro objasnění viz pozměňovací návrh 4.
See Amendment 4 for further clarification.
Členské státy musí přijmout veškerá potřebná opatření se zvláštním ohledem na MSP , která podpoří velitele lodí, operátory, zprostředkovatele lodní navigace na vlastních vodních cestách, lodní přepravce nebo majitele zboží přepravovaného na palubě takových lodí i lodě samotné k tomu, aby dodržovali požadavky stanovené v této směrnici, a která umožní sledovat zda jsou požadavky dodržovány.
Member States shall take all necessary measures , with special attention to the needs of SMEs, to monitor and encourage that the boat masters, operators or agents of vessels navigating on their waterways, shippers or owners of goods carried on board such vessels as well as the vessels comply with the requirements under this Directive.
Komise zajistí, aby byly příslu šné informace týkající se chystaných opatření včas dostupné všem dotčeným stranám.
The Commission shall ensure that relevant information about envisaged measures is made available to interested parties in due time.
Aby se zajistila možnost využití znalostí a zkušeností, které existují v průmyslovém sektoru a v rámci organizací jako je např. Ústřední komise pro plavbu po Rýně, měla by Komise a RIS usilovat o nepřetržitý dialog, šíření informací a trvalé konzultace se všemi dotčenými stranami.
In order to make use of the knowledge and experience that exist within industry and within organisations such as the Central Commission for Navigation on the Rhine, the Commission and the RIS Committee should seek a permanent dialogue,the dissemination of information and continuous consultation with the interested parties.
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o harmonizovaných informačních službách v oblasti říční dopravy na vnitrozemských cestách ve Společenství
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and Council on harmonised River Traffic Information Services on inland waterways in the Community
Navrhovatel Datum jmenování
Draftsman Date appointed
Datum projednání ve výboru
Discussed in committee
Richard James Ashworth, Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Garrelt Duin, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
Richard James Ashworth, Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Garrelt Duin, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o harmonizovaných informačních službách v oblasti říční dopravy na vnitrozemských vodních cestách ve Společenství
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised River Traffic Information Services on inland waterways in the Community
článek 67
Rule 67
Zpravodajka Datum jmenování
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
Předcházející zpravodaj
Previous rapporteur(s)
Zpochybnění právního základu Datum, kdy výbor ITRE zaujal stanovisko
Legal basis disputed Date of ITRE opinion
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michaël Cramer, Arunas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist-Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanislaw Jalowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromir Kohlicek, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Boguslaw Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michaël Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Sean O Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luis Queiro, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zile
Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Etelka Barsi Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michaël Cramer, Arunas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist-Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanislaw Jalowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromir Kohlicek, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Boguslaw Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Michaël Henry Nattrass, Robert Navarro, Sean O Neachtain, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luis Queiro, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zile
NÁVRH DOPORUČENÍ PRO DRUHÉ ČTENÍ
RECOMMENDATION FOR SECOND READING
ke společnému postoji Rady ohledně přijetí rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o jednotném rámci Společenství na podporu průhlednosti v oblasti kvalifikací a schopností (Europass)
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass)
PE 349.848v02-00
PE 349.848v02-00
o společném postoji Rady ohledně přijetí rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o jednotném rámci Společenství na podporu průhlednosti v oblasti kvalifikací a schopností (Europass)
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass)
(Postup spolurozhodování: druhé čtení)
(Codecision procedure: second reading)
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (12242/1/2004 – C6‑0158/2004 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (12242/1/2004 – C6‑0158/2004 ),
– s ohledem na své stanovisko v prvním čtení
– having regard to its position at first reading
Texty přijaté k návrhu Komise předloženému Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2003)0796 )
Texts Adopted, on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0796 )
Dosud nezveřejněný v Úředním věstníku.
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na doporučení pro druhé čtení dané Výborem pro kulturu a vzdělávání ( A6‑0056/2004 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0056/2004 ),