natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
* tři měsíce ode dne uvedeného v prvním odstavci.
* three months from the date referred to in the first paragraph.
It is important that this Regulation is applied as quickly as possible.
It is important that this Regulation is applied as quickly as possible.
Three months is a realistic date.
Three months is a realistic date.
"The protection of the right of every person of present and future generations to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being" is the ultimate objective of the UN/ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), signed in 1998 by the European Community, together with the fifteen Member States.
"The protection of the right of every person of present and future generations to live in an environment adequate to his or her health and well-being" is the ultimate objective of the UN/ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), signed in 1998 by the European Community, together with the fifteen Member States.
This objective shall be reached by allowing the public to become more involved in environmental matters and to actively contribute to improved preservation and protection of the environment.
This objective shall be reached by allowing the public to become more involved in environmental matters and to actively contribute to improved preservation and protection of the environment.
The Convention, which entered into force in October 2001, is built on three main pillars: access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters.
The Convention, which entered into force in October 2001, is built on three main pillars: access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters.
The European Community has already adopted several legislative instruments in order to fulfil its obligation to implement the Aarhus Convention, especially Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to information in environmental matters
The European Community has already adopted several legislative instruments in order to fulfil its obligation to implement the Aarhus Convention, especially Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to information in environmental matters
The proposal on a draft Regulation on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention to EC institutions and bodies
The proposal on a draft Regulation on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention to EC institutions and bodies
COM(2003)622 - submitted by the Commission alongside a draft decision on the conclusion of the Aarhus Convention
COM(2003)622 - submitted by the Commission alongside a draft decision on the conclusion of the Aarhus Convention
COM(2003) 625 - is a horizontal instrument, which envisages the application of all three pillars of the Convention and is supposed to complement existing legislation (such as Regulation No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission
COM(2003) 625 - is a horizontal instrument, which envisages the application of all three pillars of the Convention and is supposed to complement existing legislation (such as Regulation No 1049/2001 regarding public access to documents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.05.2001 p.43 ).
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.05.2001 p.43 ).
At the same time the Commission presented a draft directive on access to justice in environmental matters
At the same time the Commission presented a draft directive on access to justice in environmental matters
The Commission argued that the provisions of the Convention were more detailed and that the scope was broader than existing Community legislation and that therefore, the Community should adopt the Regulation in order to fully apply the requirements of the Aarhus Convention to the Community institutions and bodies before ratifying the Aarhus Convention.
The Commission argued that the provisions of the Convention were more detailed and that the scope was broader than existing Community legislation and that therefore, the Community should adopt the Regulation in order to fully apply the requirements of the Aarhus Convention to the Community institutions and bodies before ratifying the Aarhus Convention.
p2. of COM(2003)622
p2. of COM(2003)622
However, as this view was not shared by the Council, the European Community ratified the Convention on 17 February 2005 and became a party at the second Meeting of the Parties (MOP-2) in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in May 2005.
However, as this view was not shared by the Council, the European Community ratified the Convention on 17 February 2005 and became a party at the second Meeting of the Parties (MOP-2) in Almaty, Kazakhstan, in May 2005.
Three Members of the European Parliament, including the Rapporteur, participated in the Meeting in Almaty as part of European Community delegation.
Three Members of the European Parliament, including the Rapporteur, participated in the Meeting in Almaty as part of European Community delegation.
The vote of the European Parliament in first reading took place on 31 March 2004.
The vote of the European Parliament in first reading took place on 31 March 2004.
Following a political agreement on 20 December 2004, the Council adopted on 18 July 2005 its common position.
Following a political agreement on 20 December 2004, the Council adopted on 18 July 2005 its common position.
Parliament's first reading aimed at aligning the text of the draft Regulation further to the Aarhus Convention and to Regulation 1049/2001 where this was considered appropriate.
Parliament's first reading aimed at aligning the text of the draft Regulation further to the Aarhus Convention and to Regulation 1049/2001 where this was considered appropriate.
Members felt in particular, that provisions on public participation concerning plans and programmes were not sufficiently detailed and that their application should be broadened.
Members felt in particular, that provisions on public participation concerning plans and programmes were not sufficiently detailed and that their application should be broadened.
The promotion of sustainable development was added as a main objective in the field of Community environment legislation and as a criterion for entitlement of entities to request an internal review of administrative acts or omissions.
The promotion of sustainable development was added as a main objective in the field of Community environment legislation and as a criterion for entitlement of entities to request an internal review of administrative acts or omissions.
Furthermore, Parliament felt that deadlines needed to be more balanced; as a consequence, deadlines for reply by the EU institutions and bodies were shortened, those for requests for an internal review extended.
Furthermore, Parliament felt that deadlines needed to be more balanced; as a consequence, deadlines for reply by the EU institutions and bodies were shortened, those for requests for an internal review extended.
As regards the third pillar, the right of Members of the public for internal review and subsequently court proceedings was explicitly codified.
As regards the third pillar, the right of Members of the public for internal review and subsequently court proceedings was explicitly codified.
Common Position and Recommendation for second reading
Common Position and Recommendation for second reading
Out of the 35 amendments adopted in first reading, only 5 have - at least partially - been included in the Council's common position.
Out of the 35 amendments adopted in first reading, only 5 have - at least partially - been included in the Council's common position.
The Environment Committee considers the common position not far-reaching enough to implement the provisions of the Aarhus Convention.
The Environment Committee considers the common position not far-reaching enough to implement the provisions of the Aarhus Convention.
· first pillar
· first pillar
The committee is opposed to the application of two different sets of rules to access to information.
The committee is opposed to the application of two different sets of rules to access to information.
In particular with regard to exceptions, Directive 2003/4 on public access to environmental information should be applied by EC institutions and bodies as the more specific legislative instrument.
In particular with regard to exceptions, Directive 2003/4 on public access to environmental information should be applied by EC institutions and bodies as the more specific legislative instrument.
Regulation 1049/2001 does not sufficiently take into account the particular status granted to access to environmental information under the Convention.
Regulation 1049/2001 does not sufficiently take into account the particular status granted to access to environmental information under the Convention.
· second pillar
· second pillar
The committee welcomes the far more detailed procedural requirements which Community institutions and bodies have to meet, but is not entirely satisfied with all aspects of the procedure.
The committee welcomes the far more detailed procedural requirements which Community institutions and bodies have to meet, but is not entirely satisfied with all aspects of the procedure.
It therefore re-introduces AM 22 of first reading and insists that more generous deadlines should be provided to the public in order to guarantee a genuine right of participation in decision-making.
It therefore re-introduces AM 22 of first reading and insists that more generous deadlines should be provided to the public in order to guarantee a genuine right of participation in decision-making.
The term "policies" should be added to the term of "plans and programmes relating to the environment" to implement Article 7 of the Aarhus Convention thoroughly.
The term "policies" should be added to the term of "plans and programmes relating to the environment" to implement Article 7 of the Aarhus Convention thoroughly.
The definition should include those plans and programmes, that are merely funded by EC institutions and bodies, as those might have a major impact on the environment.
The definition should include those plans and programmes, that are merely funded by EC institutions and bodies, as those might have a major impact on the environment.
Besides, the committee feels that the exclusion of banking programmes is contrary to the provision of the Aarhus Convention, which stipulates that exceptions have to be interpreted narrowly.
Besides, the committee feels that the exclusion of banking programmes is contrary to the provision of the Aarhus Convention, which stipulates that exceptions have to be interpreted narrowly.
· third pillar
· third pillar
In the view of the Environment Committee the common position restricts the access to internal review in an unjustified manner.
In the view of the Environment Committee the common position restricts the access to internal review in an unjustified manner.
Firstly, a broader range of organisations should be entitled to make a request for internal review.
Firstly, a broader range of organisations should be entitled to make a request for internal review.
To this end the committee
To this end the committee
adopted an amendment including non-governmental organisations which are active in promoting sustainable development, such as trade unions.
adopted an amendment including non-governmental organisations which are active in promoting sustainable development, such as trade unions.
Secondly, the committee re-introduces the wording of the Commission
Secondly, the committee re-introduces the wording of the Commission
proposal as regards the obligation of EC institutions and bodies to address a decision on the measures to be taken to ensure compliance with environmental law.
proposal as regards the obligation of EC institutions and bodies to address a decision on the measures to be taken to ensure compliance with environmental law.
The wording 'decision' (as opposed to a 'written reply', wording of the common position)
The wording 'decision' (as opposed to a 'written reply', wording of the common position)
assures that the applicant receives a response addressed to him/her and therefore
assures that the applicant receives a response addressed to him/her and therefore
may initiate court proceedings in accordance with Article 230 (4) ECT.
may initiate court proceedings in accordance with Article 230 (4) ECT.
Lastly, the Environment committee deplores that no further progress has been achieved in the Council on the proposal of a directive on access to justice, which is of vital importance in implementing Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention.
Lastly, the Environment committee deplores that no further progress has been achieved in the Council on the proposal of a directive on access to justice, which is of vital importance in implementing Article 9 of the Aarhus Convention.
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o použití ustanovení Aarhuské úmluvy o přístupu k informacím, účasti veřejnosti na rozhodování a přístupu k právní ochraně v záležitostech životního prostředí na orgány a subjekty Společenství
Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies
ENVI 29.9.2005
ENVI 29.9.2005
Eija-Riitta Korhola 3.10.2005
Eija-Riitta Korhola 3.10.2005
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, Frederika Brepoels, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, Frederika Brepoels, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Jonas Sjöstedt, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
o tvrzeních týkajících se zneužívání valencijského pozemkového zákona neboli Ley reguladora de la actividad urbanística (LRAU – Zákon o řízení stavebních činností) a jeho dopadech na evropské občany (petice 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 a další)
on the alleged abuse of the Valencian Land Law known as the LRAU and its effect on European citizens (Petitions 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 and others)
PE 362.800v02-00
PE 362.800v02-00
– s ohledem na článek 6 Smlouvy o EU, který provádí ustanovení Úmluvy o ochraně lidských práv a základních svobod, a s ohledem na článek 7 Smlouvy o EU, který stanoví postup zjišťování závažného a trvajícího porušení zásad uvedených v článku 6,
– having regard to Article 6 of the EU Treaty which transposes the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), and Article 7 of the EU Treaty, which provides for a procedure to determine serious and persistent breaches of the principles mentioned in Article 6,
– s ohledem na směrnice 92/50/EHS
– having regard to Directives 92/50/EEC
Směrnice Rady 85/337/EHS ze dne 27. června 1985 o posuzování vlivů některých veřejných a soukromých záměrů na životní prostředí (Úř. věst.
Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
Směrnice Rady 97/11/ES ze dne 3. března 1997, kterou se mění směrnice 85/337/EHS (Úř.věst.
Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 amending Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
L 73, 14.3.1997, s. 5). a 2001/42/ES
5). and 2001/42/EC
Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady 2001/42/ES ze dne 27. června 2001 o posuzování vlivů některých plánů a programů na životní prostředí (Úř. věst.
Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.
– s ohledem na petiční právo stanovené v článcích 21 a 194 Smlouvy o ES,
– having regard to the right of petition as contained in Articles 21 and 194 of the EC Treaty,
– s ohledem na zprávu Petičního výboru ( A6‑0382/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0382/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že Evropský parlament obdržel značný počet peticí (zhruba 15 000) od jednotlivců a sdružení zastupujících několik tisíc evropských občanů a osob s trvalým pobytem v autonomní oblasti Valencie, které obsahují stížnosti na různé stránky stavebních činností, např. na ničení životní prostředí a krajní urbanistická řešení, v mnoha případech také svědčí o odepření řádně nabytých vlastnických práv, a to v důsledku zneužití valencijského pozemkového zákona (Ley reguladora de la actividad urbanística - LRAU),
A. whereas it has received a large number of petitions (around 15 000) from individuals and associations representing several thousand European citizens, and residents, settled in the Valencia autonomous region, complaining about very different aspects of urban development, including destruction of the environment and building excesses and in many cases protesting about the denial of their legitimately acquired property rights as a result of the improper application of the Valencian Land Law (Ley reguladora de la actividad urbanística – LRAU),
B. vzhledem k tomu, že Petiční výbor vypracoval v květnu 2004 zprávu o této záležitosti, která uváděla zejména konkrétní případy závažného porušování lidských práv a práva Společenství,
B. whereas a report was drawn up by the Committee on Petitions on this subject in May 2004 setting out, in particular, specific cases illustrating serious and persistent violations of human rights and Community law,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že Petiční výbor jmenoval novou delegaci, jejíž mise doplňovala misi delegace z května 2004 a která v červnu 2005 pokračovala ve vyšetřování zejména v Madridu a v oblasti Valencie s cílem získat informace a vyslechnout zúčastněné a hlavní odpovědné činitele,
C. whereas a new delegation appointed for a follow-up mission to that of May 2004 by the Committee on Petitions has continued the investigations carried out in particular in Madrid and in the region of Valencia in June 2005, in order to gather information and conduct interviews with the interested parties and key players,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že členové delegace měli tak příležitost vyslechnout dotčené strany, zvláště:
D. whereas the members of the delegation thus had an opportunity to hear the parties concerned, including:
– evropské občany a osoby s trvalým pobytem, kteří se obrátili na Parlament s peticí o soustavném porušování svých práv, a to v důsledku uplatňování LRAU,
– the European citizens and residents who have petitioned Parliament alleging systematic violation of their rights as a result of the application of the LRAU,
– předsedu regionální valencijské vlády a odpovědné ministry, předsedu valencijského parlamentu (Cortes Valencianas) a vedoucí politických skupin, valencijského veřejného obhájce práv (Sindic de Greuges) a španělského veřejného obhájce práv (Defensor del Pueblo), vysoké úředníky vlády v Madridu a ve Valencii, Federaci starostů oblasti Valencie, představitele stavebního odvětví a stavební firmy, velvyslance členských států a mnoho dalších zúčastněných stran,
– the president of the Valencian regional government and the responsible ministers, the president of the Valencian parliament (Cortes Valencianas) and the political group leaders, the Valencian ombudsman (Sindic de Greuges) and the national ombudsman (Defensor del Pueblo), senior government officials from Madrid and Valencia, the federation of mayors of the Valencian region, representatives of the construction industry and property developers, the ambassadors of the Member States and many other interested parties,
– zástupce Ústavního soudu, stejně jako předsedu valencijského soudu, kteří jednomyslně, otevřeně a dobrovolně spolupracovali a dokazovali tak svou ochotu konstruktivně spolupracovat, která byla velmi oceňována,
– and, lastly, representatives of the Constitutional Court and the president of the Court of Valencia who without exception cooperated with openness and goodwill, thus showing a spirit of constructive cooperation which is greatly appreciated,
E. vzhledem k tomu, že v této otázce se jasně uznává pravomoc a odpovědnost autonomních regionálních orgánů, španělských celostátních orgánů , které jsou určeny ustanoveními španělské ústavy z roku 1978, a to zejména u zkoumané otázky v článcích 10, 18, 33, 45, 47, 54, 93 a 105,
E. whereas the competence and responsibility of the autonomous regional authorities and of the Spanish national authorities are clear and recognised in this matter and that they are enshrined in the provisions of the Spanish Constitution of 1978 and, more particularly, for the matter under consideration, in Articles 10, 18, 33, 45, 47, 54, 93 and 105 thereof,
F. vzhledem k tomu, že evropské orgány jsou povinny respektovat ustanovení smluv a právních předpisů přijatých podle těchto smluv, zejména s ohledem na práva a povinnosti spojené s evropským občanstvím, mají tudíž ve spolupráci s členskými státy odpovědnost za řešení problémů, které se týkají evropských občanů,
F. whereas the European institutions have the duty to enforce the provisions of the treaties and of the legislation adopted thereunder, having particular regard to the rights and obligations of European citizenship, and accordingly have a responsibility, in cooperation with the Member States, for resolving the problems affecting Europe’s citizens,
G. vzhledem k pozemkovým právním předpisům, které jsou platné ve Španělsku a které přisuzují 90 % stavebních práv vlastníkům pozemku, a vzhledem ke zvláštní povaze LRAU, která nutí majitele, aby v případě, že místní správa schválí plán rozvoje (PAI), přenechali bez náhrady 10 % obci jako tzv. „Patrimonio Municipal Suelo“, stejně jako pozemek pro případné cesty, silnice, parkoviště atd., veřejné prostory a veřejná zařízení, nebo aby zaplatili náklady na rozvoj určené investorem této nové infrastruktury, což je postup, který vlastník pozemku nemůže nijak kontrolovat,
G. whereas current property law in Spain grants property owners 90 % of construction rights and the specific nature of the LRAU requires property owners, in the event of the approval of a land development project ( Plan de actuación integrada – PAI) by a local authority, to cede a minimum of 10 % of their property to the municipality as ‘Patrimonio Municipal Suelo’ (municipal land asset), together with the land for any paths, roads, car parks etc., public areas and public facilities, or pay development costs decided by the developer of that new infrastructure, a procedure over which the owner has no control,