natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
With regard to the costs for businesses due to the requirement to report, your rapporteur is of the opinion that the requested information in almost all cases is already available.
With regard to the costs for businesses due to the requirement to report, your rapporteur is of the opinion that the requested information in almost all cases is already available.
As the Member States, with the exception of Slovakia and Malta, have signed the UN-ECE protocol, they already have an obligation to develop a national PRTR.
As the Member States, with the exception of Slovakia and Malta, have signed the UN-ECE protocol, they already have an obligation to develop a national PRTR.
The European PRTR established by this regulation would therefore give Member States the possibility to comply with the UN-ECE protocol at lower costs, due to efficiency and support from other Member States and the Commission.
The European PRTR established by this regulation would therefore give Member States the possibility to comply with the UN-ECE protocol at lower costs, due to efficiency and support from other Member States and the Commission.
On a limited number of subjects, your rapporteur is of the opinion that the Commission’s proposal could be improved.
On a limited number of subjects, your rapporteur is of the opinion that the Commission’s proposal could be improved.
The most important amendment proposed concerns article 5, where your rapporteur suggests to add the requirement, for a pollutant falling into multiple categories according to Annex II, to report it in all these categories.
The most important amendment proposed concerns article 5, where your rapporteur suggests to add the requirement, for a pollutant falling into multiple categories according to Annex II, to report it in all these categories.
An example of this is category 7 ( Non-methane VOCs ).
An example of this is category 7 ( Non-methane VOCs ).
Benzene could fall under this category, but is also listed separately (category 62).
Benzene could fall under this category, but is also listed separately (category 62).
To prevent any misunderstandings about which category a substance falls under, it would be suitable to make this clear in the regulation itself.
To prevent any misunderstandings about which category a substance falls under, it would be suitable to make this clear in the regulation itself.
The best solution to this problem is the requirement to report a substance in all relevant categories, thus preventing operators from having to make this choice.
The best solution to this problem is the requirement to report a substance in all relevant categories, thus preventing operators from having to make this choice.
The other proposed amendments are for the main part aimed at improving the coherence and clarity of the text of the proposal.
The other proposed amendments are for the main part aimed at improving the coherence and clarity of the text of the proposal.
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO RYBOLOV
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries
k návrhu nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zřizuje Evropský registr úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek a kterým se mění směrnice Rady 91/689/EHS a 96/61/ES
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC
This proposal by the Commission would significantly enhance the public's access to environmental information by creating an EU-wide register of pollutants released into the environment.
This proposal by the Commission would significantly enhance the public's access to environmental information by creating an EU-wide register of pollutants released into the environment.
This is to be accomplished by replacing the current European Pollutant Emission Register by a new European Pollution Release and Transfer Register (EPRTR), thus fulfilling the Community's obligation to put into effect a UN Economic Commission for Europe convention.
This is to be accomplished by replacing the current European Pollutant Emission Register by a new European Pollution Release and Transfer Register (EPRTR), thus fulfilling the Community's obligation to put into effect a UN Economic Commission for Europe convention.
The proposal is thus to be welcomed.
The proposal is thus to be welcomed.
It is important to note that the register would only facilitate and improve the access the public would have to information about pollution in the EU; it does not in any way impose further restrictions on emissions into the air, water or land.
It is important to note that the register would only facilitate and improve the access the public would have to information about pollution in the EU; it does not in any way impose further restrictions on emissions into the air, water or land.
The register should, therefore, strive to be as inclusive as possible, by including the greatest percentage of pollutant emissions that is practicable, rather than concentrating on only a few of the larger sources.
The register should, therefore, strive to be as inclusive as possible, by including the greatest percentage of pollutant emissions that is practicable, rather than concentrating on only a few of the larger sources.
The register would then be a very valuable tool for informing the public and leading to improved decision-making.
The register would then be a very valuable tool for informing the public and leading to improved decision-making.
There are many effects of pollution on fisheries, ranging from its impacts on ecosystems, fish health and reproduction to consequences for human health, due to consumption of contaminated seafood.
There are many effects of pollution on fisheries, ranging from its impacts on ecosystems, fish health and reproduction to consequences for human health, due to consumption of contaminated seafood.
The recent discussions over dioxin in certain fish provide a good example of the latter.
The recent discussions over dioxin in certain fish provide a good example of the latter.
Výbor pro rybolov vyzývá Výbor pro životní prostředí, veřejné zdraví a bezpečnost potravin, aby jako příslušný výbor schválil text navržený Komisí.
The Committee on Fisheries calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to approve the text proposed by Commission.
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zřizuje Evropský registr úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek a kterým se mění směrnice Rady 91/689/EHS a 96/61/ES
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC
Carl Schlyter 25.11.2004
Carl Schlyter 25.11.2004
Elspeth Attwooll, Niels Busk, David Casa, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Alfred Gomolka, Heinz Kindermann, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Albert Jan Maat, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Philippe Morillon, Neil Parish, Dirk Sterckx, Catherine Stihler
Elspeth Attwooll, Niels Busk, David Casa, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Alfred Gomolka, Heinz Kindermann, Henrik Dam Kristensen, Albert Jan Maat, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Philippe Morillon, Neil Parish, Dirk Sterckx, Catherine Stihler
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zřizuje Evropský registr úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek a kterým se mění směrnice Rady 91/689/EHS a 96/61/ES)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establisment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC
ITRE 10.1.2005
ITRE 10.1.2005
AGRI 10.1.2005
AGRI 10.1.2005
AGRI 23.11.2005
AGRI 23.11.2005
Hannes Blokland 30.11.2004
Hans Blokland 30.11.2004
Změna finanční dotace Datum, kdy výbor BUDG zaujal stzanovisko
Financial endowment amended Date of BUDG opinion
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Protokolu EHK – OSN o registrech úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek jménem Evropského společenství
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
PE 355.595v02-00
PE 355.595v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2004)0635 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0635 )
– s ohledem na Protokol EHK – OSN o registrech úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek,
– having regard to the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,
175 odst.
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0170/2005 ),
300 odst.
Approves the conclusion of the Protocol;
“The Protocol is the first legally binding international instrument on pollutant release and transfer registers.
“The Protocol is the first legally binding international instrument on pollutant release and transfer registers.
Its objective is "to enhance public access to information through the establishment of coherent, nationwide pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs).
Its objective is "to enhance public access to information through the establishment of coherent, nationwide pollutant release and transfer registers (PRTRs).
Although regulating information on pollution, rather than pollution directly, the protocol is expected to exert a significant downward pressure on levels of pollution, as no company will want to be identified as among the biggest polluters.
Although regulating information on pollution, rather than pollution directly, the protocol is expected to exert a significant downward pressure on levels of pollution, as no company will want to be identified as among the biggest polluters.
PRTRs are inventories of pollution from industrial sites and other sources.”
PRTRs are inventories of pollution from industrial sites and other sources.”
This message was issued by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE) after the adoption and signature of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (“the Protocol”) at an extra-ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention on 21 May 2003 in Kiev.
This message was issued by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN-ECE) after the adoption and signature of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (“the Protocol”) at an extra-ordinary meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention on 21 May 2003 in Kiev.
So far, 36 states and the European Community have signed the Protocol.
So far, 36 states and the European Community have signed the Protocol.
Out of the 25 Member States of the European Union, only Malta and Slovakia have not signed it yet.
Out of the 25 Member States of the European Union, only Malta and Slovakia have not signed it yet.
In order for the ratification of the Protocol on behalf of the European Community to be completed, the Council has to take the decision to designate the person or persons empowered to deposit the instrument of approval with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
In order for the ratification of the Protocol on behalf of the European Community to be completed, the Council has to take the decision to designate the person or persons empowered to deposit the instrument of approval with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
After the ratification, the Parliament and the Council should adopt legislation in order to achieve compliance with the requirements of the Protocol.
After the ratification, the Parliament and the Council should adopt legislation in order to achieve compliance with the requirements of the Protocol.
This legislative process has already started, as the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation
This legislative process has already started, as the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation
COM(2004)634 , which is currently being examined by Parliament and Council through the co-decision procedure.
COM(2004)634 , which is currently being examined by Parliament and Council through the co-decision procedure.
The goal of the Protocol, and of PRTRs, is to have a better understanding of the amount of pollutants emitted by installations, and to make this information easily available to the public by requiring operators to report their emissions and making these reports available to a broad audience.
The goal of the Protocol, and of PRTRs, is to have a better understanding of the amount of pollutants emitted by installations, and to make this information easily available to the public by requiring operators to report their emissions and making these reports available to a broad audience.
The Commission calls PRTRs in its proposed Regulation “ an essential tool to ensure public awareness on environmental issues and to promote better implementation of environmental legislation.”
The Commission calls PRTRs in its proposed Regulation “ an essential tool to ensure public awareness on environmental issues and to promote better implementation of environmental legislation.”
For the European Union this Protocol will give an extension of the right for the public to be informed about activities carried out by businesses in their vicinity.
For the European Union this Protocol will give an extension of the right for the public to be informed about activities carried out by businesses in their vicinity.
Under the Aarhus Convention and its acts of implementation, there is already an established right for citizens to have access to government information on environmental issues.
Under the Aarhus Convention and its acts of implementation, there is already an established right for citizens to have access to government information on environmental issues.
This right also aims at improving public awareness and promoting better legislation.
This right also aims at improving public awareness and promoting better legislation.
Implementation of this Protocol will lead to the availability of more accurate and more recent data for the public, and is as such a development worthwhile to be supported by the Parliament.
Implementation of this Protocol will lead to the availability of more accurate and more recent data for the public, and is as such a development worthwhile to be supported by the Parliament.
With regard to making environmental information available to the public, the EU should be amongst the frontrunners in the world.
With regard to making environmental information available to the public, the EU should be amongst the frontrunners in the world.
As a result of numerous directives and regulations, an enormous amount of data is already being collected in order to give local, regional, national and European authorities information on the impact of their policy.
As a result of numerous directives and regulations, an enormous amount of data is already being collected in order to give local, regional, national and European authorities information on the impact of their policy.
This information should become available for the public too.
This information should become available for the public too.
The Commission has stated in its Communication on the 6 th Environmental Action Programme
The Commission has stated in its Communication on the 6 th Environmental Action Programme
COM(2001)31 that “individual citizens [are making] daily decisions that directly or indirectly impact the environment.
COM(2001)31 that “individual citizens [are making] daily decisions that directly or indirectly impact the environment.
Better quality and easily accessible information on the environment and on practical matters will help shape opinions and thus decisions.”
Better quality and easily accessible information on the environment and on practical matters will help shape opinions and thus decisions.”
This was supported by the Parliament and the Council in Decision 1600/2002/EC
This was supported by the Parliament and the Council in Decision 1600/2002/EC
In order to turn these intentions into achievements, the EU should, in future UN-ECE negotiations on modifications of this Protocol, aim at an extension of the list of installations having a requirement to report, and to lower the threshold levels where possible and workable.
In order to turn these intentions into achievements, the EU should, in future UN-ECE negotiations on modifications of this Protocol, aim at an extension of the list of installations having a requirement to report, and to lower the threshold levels where possible and workable.
Only by giving accurate and clear information on all environmental impacts of industries and services in the European Union, we will be able to promote the process of integration of environmental concerns into all Community policies and activities in line with Article 6 of the Treaty
Only by giving accurate and clear information on all environmental impacts of industries and services in the European Union, we will be able to promote the process of integration of environmental concerns into all Community policies and activities in line with Article 6 of the Treaty
To achieve this, this Protocol would be a step in the right direction and its ratification by the European Community would therefore be worthy of our support.
To achieve this, this Protocol would be a step in the right direction and its ratification by the European Community would therefore be worthy of our support.
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o uzavření Protokolu EHK OSN o registrech úniků a přenosů znečišťujících látek jménem Evropského společenství
Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
ENVI 12.4.2005
ENVI 12.4.2005
JURI 12.4.2005
JURI 12.4.2005
ITRE 12.4.2005
ITRE 12.4.2005
JURI 24.11.2005
JURI 24.11.2005
Hannes Blokland 30.11.2004
Hannes Blokland 30.11.2004
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Martin Callanan, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Martin Callanan, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Jillian Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Linda McAvan, Marios Matsakis, Péter Olajos, Dimitrios Papadimoulis, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Jonas Sjöstedt, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund
PE 349.846v03-00
PE 349.846v03-00
NÁVRH LEGISLATIVNÍHO USNESENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU...........................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................3
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6–0171/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0171/2005 ),
Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o náhradách v případech nesplnění smluvních požadavků na kvalitu služeb v oblasti nákladní železniční dopravy
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compensation in cases of non-compliance with contractual quality requirements for rail freight services
Roberts Zīle 28.7.2004
Roberts Zīle 28.7.2004
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack,Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack,Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
PE 357.505v02-00
PE 357.505v02-00
EXPOSÉ DES MOTIFS..............................................................................................................9
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................9
STANOVISKO Výboru pro kulturu a vzdělávání ..............................................15
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION................................14
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise ( KOM(2004)0111 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission (COM(2004) 0111),
– s ohledem na závěry Rady ze dne 9. a 10. prosince 2004 (15472/04),
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 9 and 10 December 2004 (15472/04),
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise „Směrem ke globálnímu partnerství v informační společnosti: Přeměna ženevských zásad v činy“ ( KOM(2004)0480 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission "Towards a Global Partnership in the Information Society: Translating the Geneva principles into actions" (COM(2004) 0480),
– s ohledem na závěry Rady ze dne 8. a 9. března 2004 (2206/04),
– having regard the Council conclusions of 8 and 9 March 2004 (2206/04),
– s ohledem na prohlášení zásad a akční plán o světovém summitu o informační společnosti přijaté dne 12. prosince 2003,
– having regard to the Declaration of Principles and the Plan of Action of the WSIS adopted on 12 December 2003,
– s ohledem na rezoluci UNESCO 32C/34 ze dne 17. října 2003 o vhodnosti vytvoření mezinárodního normativního nástroje na ochranu kulturní rozmanitosti,
– having regard to UNESCO Resolution 32C/34 of 17 October 2003 on the Desirability of Drawing up an International Standard-setting Instrument on Cultural Diversity,
– s ohledem na předběžnou studii výkonného výboru UNESCO ze dne 12. března 2003 o odborných a právních aspektech vhodnosti normativního nástroje na ochranu kulturní rozmanitosti,
– having regard to the UNESCO Executive Board's Preliminary Study of 12 March 2003 on the Technical and Legal Aspects Relating to the Desirability of a Standard-setting Instrument on Cultural Diversity,