natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
United Kingdom 0.28 0.21 0.31 0.39 0.40 0.33 0.32 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.26 0.26
United Kingdom 0.28 0.21 0.31 0.39 0.40 0.33 0.32 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.26 0.26
Bulgaria : : : : : : : : 0.85 0.50 0.45 0.65
Bulgaria : : : : : : : : 0.85 0.50 0.45 0.65
Romania : : : : : : : : 2.93 5.03 1.78 :
Romania : : : : : : : : 2.93 5.03 1.78 :
United States : : : : : : : : : : : :
United States : : : : : : : : : : : :
k reformě státní podpory v letech 2005–2009
on State aid reform 2005-2009
Výbor pro regionální rozvoj vyzývá Hospodářský a měnový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého návrhu usnesení začlenil tyto návrhy:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
6. v tomto kontextu poukazuje na záměr Komise zvýšit práh podpory de minimis ze současných 100 000 eur a doporučuje změnit pravidlo upravující kumulace podpor;
Notes, in this context, the Commission's intention to increase the de minimis threshold from the current level of EUR 100 000 and recommends the reform of the cumulation rule;
The Road map for State aid reform 2005-2009 outlines the guiding principles for a comprehensive reform of State aid rules and procedures over the next five years.
The Road map for State aid reform 2005-2009 outlines the guiding principles for a comprehensive reform of State aid rules and procedures over the next five years.
This overall reform aims at implementing the European Council commitment to "less, but better targeted" State aid.
This overall reform aims at implementing the European Council commitment to "less, but better targeted" State aid.
The main four elements of the reform consist of:
The main four elements of the reform consist of:
1. less and better targeted State aid, which clearly meets identified objectives of common interest,
1. less and better targeted State aid, which clearly meets identified objectives of common interest,
2. a refined economic approach including an assessment of the appropriateness and proportionality of aid granted,
2. a refined economic approach including an assessment of the appropriateness and proportionality of aid granted,
3. more effective procedures and enforcement, greater predictability, less bureaucracy and more transparency
3. more effective procedures and enforcement, greater predictability, less bureaucracy and more transparency
4. greater recognition of the shared responsibility of the European Commission and Member States in this field.
4. greater recognition of the shared responsibility of the European Commission and Member States in this field.
The Action Plan outlines in general terms the objectives and main issues of the following different specific State aid rules:
The Action Plan outlines in general terms the objectives and main issues of the following different specific State aid rules:
· State aid and innovation, research and development,
· State aid and innovation, research and development,
· State aid and investment in human capital,
· State aid and investment in human capital,
· State aid and services of general economic interest,
· State aid and services of general economic interest,
· Block exemptions,
· Block exemptions,
· Regional Aid Guidelines,
· Regional Aid Guidelines,
· Environmental Aid Guidelines,
· Environmental Aid Guidelines,
Furthermore, it makes a series of suggestions for modernising the practise and procedures of State aid.
Furthermore, it makes a series of suggestions for modernising the practise and procedures of State aid.
This State aid action plan embeds the current reform of the Regional Aid Guidelines (RAG) in view of adopting new RAG to be applied from 2007 onwards in the overall reform process of the EU State aid regime.
This State aid action plan embeds the current reform of the Regional Aid Guidelines (RAG) in view of adopting new RAG to be applied from 2007 onwards in the overall reform process of the EU State aid regime.
The document sets the framework for the reform of horizontal rules, which is complementary to the use of State aid in less-developed regions eligible for Regional aid.
The document sets the framework for the reform of horizontal rules, which is complementary to the use of State aid in less-developed regions eligible for Regional aid.
The document is seen as a consultation document and all stakeholders are invited to send their comments to the European Commission by September 2005.
The document is seen as a consultation document and all stakeholders are invited to send their comments to the European Commission by September 2005.
The rapporteur believes that the Committee on Regional Development should seize this opportunity to reemphasis its position on State aid as a tool for regional development.
The rapporteur believes that the Committee on Regional Development should seize this opportunity to reemphasis its position on State aid as a tool for regional development.
State aids impact on territorial cohesion and the way in which State aids are allocated will make a difference in terms of regional development.
State aids impact on territorial cohesion and the way in which State aids are allocated will make a difference in terms of regional development.
Transparent and predictable procedures and practises for notifying State aid provide certainty to investors thus facilitating investment decisions.
Transparent and predictable procedures and practises for notifying State aid provide certainty to investors thus facilitating investment decisions.
The rapporteur therefore encourages the European Commission to make concrete proposals based on the principles and ideas outlined in the Road Map for making the procedures more transparent and predictable.
The rapporteur therefore encourages the European Commission to make concrete proposals based on the principles and ideas outlined in the Road Map for making the procedures more transparent and predictable.
The procedures for notifying State aid should not deteriorate companies from investing in areas, where they can receive State aid.
The procedures for notifying State aid should not deteriorate companies from investing in areas, where they can receive State aid.
The internet can be an important tool for increasing transparency and speeding-up procedures further.
The internet can be an important tool for increasing transparency and speeding-up procedures further.
Furthermore, the risk of being obliged to pay back State aids, since they were allocated illegally, have to be minimised.
Furthermore, the risk of being obliged to pay back State aids, since they were allocated illegally, have to be minimised.
Regional development needs stable and predictable investment conditions.
Regional development needs stable and predictable investment conditions.
Legal uncertainty has also to be avoided in the context of public-private partnerships.
Legal uncertainty has also to be avoided in the context of public-private partnerships.
These partnerships have an increasing importance for regional development.
These partnerships have an increasing importance for regional development.
Large infrastructure projects in the field of transport, energy and information rely more and more often on Public-Private-Partnerships given the budgetary situation of most Member States.
Large infrastructure projects in the field of transport, energy and information rely more and more often on Public-Private-Partnerships given the budgetary situation of most Member States.
It is thus important that State aid rules for assessing public resources involved in Public-Private-Partnerships are clear.
It is thus important that State aid rules for assessing public resources involved in Public-Private-Partnerships are clear.
The European Commission should provide more legal guidance on this matter.
The European Commission should provide more legal guidance on this matter.
The reduction of bureaucracy is another crucial element to create a more enterprise-friendly legal environment.
The reduction of bureaucracy is another crucial element to create a more enterprise-friendly legal environment.
The increase of the de-minimis threshold is a very positive step for reducing the procedure to the cases of major importance.
The increase of the de-minimis threshold is a very positive step for reducing the procedure to the cases of major importance.
The European Commission has underlined in the past constantly that the reform of horizontal guidelines for State aid is complementary to reforming the Regional Aid Guidelines.
The European Commission has underlined in the past constantly that the reform of horizontal guidelines for State aid is complementary to reforming the Regional Aid Guidelines.
Thus, regions lagging economically behind have to be particularly able to benefit from horizontal State aids.
Thus, regions lagging economically behind have to be particularly able to benefit from horizontal State aids.
If these regions are not sufficiently taking into account by the new horizontal guidelines, which will be revised, in order to bring them better in line with the Lisbon Strategy, the Lisbon Strategy risks to undermine the Cohesion objectives.
If these regions are not sufficiently taking into account by the new horizontal guidelines, which will be revised, in order to bring them better in line with the Lisbon Strategy, the Lisbon Strategy risks to undermine the Cohesion objectives.
Consequently, the rapporteur believes that substantial, differentiated and fair regional bonuses in State aid rules for horizontal purposes should be granted to regions eligible for Regional State aid.
Consequently, the rapporteur believes that substantial, differentiated and fair regional bonuses in State aid rules for horizontal purposes should be granted to regions eligible for Regional State aid.
The Action plan does not address the reform of the rules for special sectors like agriculture, fisheries, coal production and transport.
The Action plan does not address the reform of the rules for special sectors like agriculture, fisheries, coal production and transport.
These sectors play often an important role in areas eligible for structural funds.
These sectors play often an important role in areas eligible for structural funds.
Thus, these rules are also of particular importance for regional development.
Thus, these rules are also of particular importance for regional development.
The European Commission should apply the same principles for rules in these special sectors and bring the sector specific rules in line with the ideas outlined in the road map.
The European Commission should apply the same principles for rules in these special sectors and bring the sector specific rules in line with the ideas outlined in the road map.
Last but not least, the rapporteur welcomes the intention of the European Commission to assess further in depth and detail the different impact of different types of State aid in terms of effectiveness and distortion of competition.
Last but not least, the rapporteur welcomes the intention of the European Commission to assess further in depth and detail the different impact of different types of State aid in terms of effectiveness and distortion of competition.
This assessment might also give some indications, which type of State aid is most beneficial for regional development.
This assessment might also give some indications, which type of State aid is most beneficial for regional development.
Reforma státní podpory v letech 2005–2009
State aid reform 2005-2009
REGI 29.9.2005
REGI 29.9.2005
Miloš Koterec 11.7.2005
Miloš Koterec 11.7.2005
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Graham Booth, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Gisela Kallenbach, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Elisabeth Schroedter, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Graham Booth, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Gerardo Galeote Quecedo, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Zita Gurmai, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Gisela Kallenbach, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Miroslav Mikolášik, Francesco Musotto, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Elisabeth Schroedter, Alyn Smith, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Reforma státní podpory v letech 2005–2009
State Aid Reform 2005-2009
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, David Casa, Jan Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Robert Goebbels, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Ian Hudghton, Sophia in 't Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Enrico Letta, Astrid Lulling, Gay Mitchell, Joseph Muscat, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Eoin Ryan, Manuel António dos Santos, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček,.
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, David Casa, Jan Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Robert Goebbels, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Ian Hudghton, Sophia in 't Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Enrico Letta, Astrid Lulling, Gay Mitchell, Joseph Muscat, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Eoin Ryan, Manuel António dos Santos, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček,.
Graham Booth, Willem Schuth, Antonio Tajani, Thomas Wise.
Graham Booth, Willem Schuth, Antonio Tajani, Thomas Wise.
k návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se ruší nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 3181/78 a nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 1736/79 v oblasti měnové politiky
on the proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3181/78 and Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/79 in the area of Monetary Policy
PE 367.884v02-00
PE 367.884v02-00
o návrhu nařízení Rady, kterým se ruší nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 3181/78 a nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 1736/79 v oblasti měnové politiky
on the proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3181/78 and Council Regulation (EEC) No 1736/79 in the area of Monetary Policy
– s ohledem na návrh Komise Radě ( KOM(2005)0611 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0611 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Hospodářského a měnového výboru ( A6‑0010/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0010/2006 ),
Návrh nařízení Rady, kterým se ruší nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 3181/78 a nařízení Rady (EHS) č. 1736/79 v oblasti měnové politiky
Proposal for a Council Regulation repealing Council Regulation (EEC) 3181/78 and Council Regulation (EEC) 1736/79 in the area of Monetary Policy
ECON 19.1.2006
ECON 19.1.2006
Zpravodaj(ové)) Datum jmenování
Rapporteur(s) Date appointed
k návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o přistoupení Společenství k předpisu č. 55 Evropské hospodářské komise Organizace spojených národů obsahujícímu jednotná ustanovení pro schvalování typu součástí mechanických spojovacích zařízení jízdních souprav vozidel
on the proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 55 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
PE 367.640v02-00
PE 367.640v02-00
NÁVRH LEGISLATIVNÍHO USNESENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU...........................5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................2
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o přistoupení Společenství k předpisu č. 55 Evropské hospodářské komise Organizace spojených národů obsahujícímu jednotná ustanovení pro schvalování typu součástí mechanických spojovacích zařízení jízdních souprav vozidel
on the proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 55 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro mezinárodní obchod ( A6‑0011/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0011/2006 ),
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady o přistoupení Společenství k předpisu č. 55 Evropské hospodářské komise Organizace spojených národů obsahujícímu jednotná ustanovení pro schvalování typu součástí mechanických spojovacích zařízení jízdních souprav vozidel
Proposal for a Council decision on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 55 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of mechanical coupling components of combinations of vehicles
INTA 13.10.2005
INTA 13.10.2005
TRAN 13.10.2005
TRAN 13.10.2005
TRAN 15.3.2005
TRAN 15.3.2005
Enrique Barón Crespo 15.3.2005
Enrique Barón Crespo 15.3.2005
Jean-Pierre Audy, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Daniel Caspary, Nigel Farage, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Syed Kamall, Sajjad Karim, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Bogusław Rogalski, Tokia Saïfi, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Zbigniew Zaleski
Jean-Pierre Audy, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Daniel Caspary, Nigel Farage, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Jacky Henin, Syed Kamall, Sajjad Karim, Caroline Lucas, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Bogusław Rogalski, Tokia Saïfi, Robert Sturdy, Johan Van Hecke, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Zbigniew Zaleski
Margrietus van den Berg, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Elisa Ferreira, Maria Martens, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
Margrietus van den Berg, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Elisa Ferreira, Maria Martens, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
Seán Ó Neachtain, Carl Schlyter
Seán Ó Neachtain, Carl Schlyter
k návrhu rozhodnutí Rady, které pozměňuje rozhodnutí 2001/507/ES a 2001/509/EC s tím, že by se nařízení Evropské hospodářské komise OSN (UNECE) č. 109 a 108 o protektorovaných pneumatikách měla stát povinnými
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making UN/ECE Regulations 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory
PE 353.675v02-00
PE 353.675v02-00
o návrhu rozhodnutí Rady, které pozměňuje rozhodnutí 2001/507/ES a 2001/509/EC s tím, že by se nařízení UN/ECE 109 a 108 o protektorovaných pneumatikách měla stát povinnými
on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making UN/ECE Regulations 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory
– s ohledem na návrh rozhodnutí Rady ( KOM(2004)0774 - 9916/2005)
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0774 - 9916/2005)
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro mezinárodní obchod ( A6‑0012/2006 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0012/2006 ),
Návrh rozhodnutí Rady, které pozměňuje rozhodnutí 2001/507/ES a 2001/509/EC s tím, že by se nařízení Evropské hospodářské komise OSN (UNECE) č. 109 a 108 o protektorovaných pneumatikách měla stát povinnými
Proposal for a Council decision amending Decisions 2001/507/EC and 2001/509/EC with a view to making UN/ECE Regulations 109 and 108 on retreaded tyres compulsory
ENVI 13.10.2005
ENVI 13.10.2005
TRAN 19.1.2005
TRAN 19.1.2005
Enrique Barón Crespo 17.1.2005
Enrique Barón Crespo 17.1.2005
Zpochybnění právního základ Datum, kdy výbor JURI zaujal stanovisko
Legal basis disputed Date of JURI opinion
o přemisťování v kontextu regionálního rozvoje
on relocation in the context of regional development
PE 362.466v02-00
PE 362.466v02-00
STANOVISKO Výboru pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci .............................12
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS..............13
– s ohledem na Chartu základních sociálních práv pracovníků z roku 1989 a k ní připojený akční plán,
– having regard to the 1989 Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and the associated action programme,
– s ohledem na směrnici Rady 94/45/ES ze dne 22. září 1994 o zřízení evropské rady zaměstnanců nebo vytvoření postupu pro informování zaměstnanců a projednání se zaměstnanci v podnicích působících na území Společenství a skupinách podniků působících na území Společenství
– having regard to Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European works council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees
– s ohledem na směrnici Rady 98/59/ES ze dne 20. července 1998 o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se hromadného propouštění
­– having regard to Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies
– s ohledem na směrnici Rady 2001/23/ES ze dne 12. března 2001 o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se zachování práv zaměstnanců v případě převodů podniků, provozoven nebo částí podniků nebo závodů
– having regard to Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses
– s ohledem na směrnici Evropského Parlamentu a Rady 2002/14/ES ze dne 11. března 2002, kterou se stanoví obecný rámec pro informování zaměstnanců a projednávání se zaměstnanci v Evropském společenství
– having regard to Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise – Pokyny k vnitrostátní regionální podpoře
– having regard to the Commission communication on guidelines on national regional aid
– s ohledem na sdělení Komise – Přezkum pokynů k vnitrostátní regionální podpoře na období po 1. lednu 2007
– having regard to the Commission communication on review of the guidelines on national regional aid for the period after 1 January 2007
– s ohledem na nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2204/2002 ze dne 12. prosince 2002 o použití článků 87 a 88 Smlouvy o ES na státní podporu zaměstnanosti
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 22 dubna 2004 o sdělení Komise ke Třetí zprávě o ekonomické a sociální soudržnosti
– having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2004 on the Commission communication on the Third Report on economic and social cohesion
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 13. března 2003 o rušení podniků, kterým byla poskytnuta finanční pomoc Evropské unie
– having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2003 on the closure of companies which have benefited from EU financial assistance
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro regionální rozvoj a stanovisko Výboru pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci ( A6‑0013/2006 ),
– having regard to the report by the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0013/2006 ),