natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komise každých pět let informuje Evropský parlament, Radu, Evropský hospodářský a sociální výbor a Poradní výbor pro bezpečnost a zdraví při práci o obsahu těchto zpráv, o svém vyhodnocení těchto zpráv a vývoje v příslušné oblasti a o každé činnosti, která by mohla být vzhledem k novým vědeckým poznatkům opodstatněná.
Every five years the Commission shall inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of the content of these reports, of its assessment of these reports, of developments in the field in question and of any action that may be warranted in the light of new scientific knowledge.
Praktický průvodce
Practical guide
S cílem usnadnit používání této směrnice vypracuje Komise praktického průvodce k provádění ustanovení článků 4 a 5 a příloh I a II.
In order to facilitate application of this directive, the Commission shall draw up a practical guide to the implementation of the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 and Annexes I and II.
In 1994, the European Parliament adopted at first reading the Commission proposal on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents ( A3-0192/1994 ).
In 1994, the European Parliament adopted at first reading the Commission proposal on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents ( A3-0192/1994 ).
This proposal was an additional measure intended to give effect to Directive 89/391/EEC by specifying how the provisions of the latter were to apply to specific cases involving exposure to any four types of physical agents, namely noise, vibrations, electromagnetic fields and optical radiation, each of which was covered by a separate annex.
This proposal was an additional measure intended to give effect to Directive 89/391/EEC by specifying how the provisions of the latter were to apply to specific cases involving exposure to any four types of physical agents, namely noise, vibrations, electromagnetic fields and optical radiation, each of which was covered by a separate annex.
In 1999, the Council decided to deal with physical agents separately by producing an individual directive for each type.
In 1999, the Council decided to deal with physical agents separately by producing an individual directive for each type.
This approach has been accepted and Parliament and the Council have adopted in turn Directive 2002/44/EC on vibrations
This approach has been accepted and Parliament and the Council have adopted in turn Directive 2002/44/EC on vibrations
More than ten years after the Commission’s original directive, the proposal for a directive now under consideration relates to the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation and is thus the last of the proposals designed to protect workers from physical agents.
More than ten years after the Commission’s original directive, the proposal for a directive now under consideration relates to the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation and is thus the last of the proposals designed to protect workers from physical agents.
General remarks - overview of the common position
General remarks - overview of the common position
The objective of this proposal for a directive is to improve the working environment and, more specifically, to protect the health and safety of workers.
The objective of this proposal for a directive is to improve the working environment and, more specifically, to protect the health and safety of workers.
It lays down exposure limit values designed to prevent accidents or adverse health effects resulting from exposure to optical radiation.
It lays down exposure limit values designed to prevent accidents or adverse health effects resulting from exposure to optical radiation.
These limit values also represent a minimum protection threshold designed to prevent distortions of competition at Union level.
These limit values also represent a minimum protection threshold designed to prevent distortions of competition at Union level.
The general outline of the common position is based on the directives on vibrations, noise and electromagnetic fields, as regards for example the exposure limit values, the information and training of workers and the consultation and participation of workers.
The general outline of the common position is based on the directives on vibrations, noise and electromagnetic fields, as regards for example the exposure limit values, the information and training of workers and the consultation and participation of workers.
The common position makes no distinction between the short- and long-term effects, arguing that the scope of the directive includes both acute and chronic adverse effects on health.
The common position makes no distinction between the short- and long-term effects, arguing that the scope of the directive includes both acute and chronic adverse effects on health.
It also relies on exposure limit values based essentially on the recommendations of the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (CIPRNI) and, to a lesser extent, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
It also relies on exposure limit values based essentially on the recommendations of the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (CIPRNI) and, to a lesser extent, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).
A distinction is drawn between radiation from artificial and from natural sources.
A distinction is drawn between radiation from artificial and from natural sources.
Compliance with the exposure limit values for artificial sources of optical radiation and systematic application of the precautionary principle as regards natural sources should, according to the common position, ensure a high level of protection from any harmful effects.
Compliance with the exposure limit values for artificial sources of optical radiation and systematic application of the precautionary principle as regards natural sources should, according to the common position, ensure a high level of protection from any harmful effects.
With regard to natural sources of optical radiation, the preventive measures concentrate on the information and training of workers.
With regard to natural sources of optical radiation, the preventive measures concentrate on the information and training of workers.
The common position includes provisions on determining the level of exposure and on risk assessment, stipulating what method should be used.
The common position includes provisions on determining the level of exposure and on risk assessment, stipulating what method should be used.
To prevent duplication, the assessment may take account of data provided by the manufacturers of the equipment, when it is covered by relevant Community directives.
To prevent duplication, the assessment may take account of data provided by the manufacturers of the equipment, when it is covered by relevant Community directives.
Once exposure to optical radiation has been established, employers must implement a programme of measures designed to eliminate or restrict as far as possible the risks arising from exposure, so that employees are not exposed to radiation in excess of the exposure limit values.
Once exposure to optical radiation has been established, employers must implement a programme of measures designed to eliminate or restrict as far as possible the risks arising from exposure, so that employees are not exposed to radiation in excess of the exposure limit values.
If, in spite of everything, the exposure limit values are exceeded, employers must immediately take measures to reduce exposure below the limit values, identify the reasons why the limit values have been exceeded and adapt the protection and prevention measures accordingly in order to prevent any recurrence of such incidents.
If, in spite of everything, the exposure limit values are exceeded, employers must immediately take measures to reduce exposure below the limit values, identify the reasons why the limit values have been exceeded and adapt the protection and prevention measures accordingly in order to prevent any recurrence of such incidents.
The rapporteur believes that this proposal for a directive marks a major step forward in protecting workers from the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation.
The rapporteur believes that this proposal for a directive marks a major step forward in protecting workers from the risks arising from exposure to optical radiation.
This European legislation is a first in the world and provides European workers with the highest possible level of protection under an international legal instrument.
This European legislation is a first in the world and provides European workers with the highest possible level of protection under an international legal instrument.
The rapporteur’s main priority is to secure a balance between the need to protect workers and the expenses this entails for employers, which might jeopardise their competitive position at international level.
The rapporteur’s main priority is to secure a balance between the need to protect workers and the expenses this entails for employers, which might jeopardise their competitive position at international level.
Unlike Directive 2004/40/EC on electromagnetic fields, this proposal applies not only to large firms but also to small and medium-sized enterprises (SME).
Unlike Directive 2004/40/EC on electromagnetic fields, this proposal applies not only to large firms but also to small and medium-sized enterprises (SME).
As a result, it is necessary to ensure that the measures adopted by employers do not jeopardise the solvency of an enterprise or its competitiveness.
As a result, it is necessary to ensure that the measures adopted by employers do not jeopardise the solvency of an enterprise or its competitiveness.
Given that the directive applies to SME, the Commission should make an effort to facilitate understanding by SME of its provisions, which are inevitably complex.
Given that the directive applies to SME, the Commission should make an effort to facilitate understanding by SME of its provisions, which are inevitably complex.
That is why, bearing in mind the Commission’s commitment to draw up practical guides on how to apply health and safety directives (see Commission communication COM(2002)0118 ), your rapporteur is asking the Commission to draw up a practical guide to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 and Annexes I and II.
That is why, bearing in mind the Commission’s commitment to draw up practical guides on how to apply health and safety directives (see Commission communication COM(2002)0118 ), your rapporteur is asking the Commission to draw up a practical guide to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 and Annexes I and II.
This will make it easier for SME to apply the directive.
This will make it easier for SME to apply the directive.
The rapporteur wished to safeguard the progress made in the previous directives on vibrations, noise and electromagnetic fields, while taking account of considerations specific to optical radiation.
The rapporteur wished to safeguard the progress made in the previous directives on vibrations, noise and electromagnetic fields, while taking account of considerations specific to optical radiation.
In this connection, he is proposing amendments to bring Article 8 on health surveillance into line with the directive on electromagnetic fields.
In this connection, he is proposing amendments to bring Article 8 on health surveillance into line with the directive on electromagnetic fields.
The rapporteur also wanted to place emphasis on the prevention and early diagnosis of any harmful health effects and on the prevention of any long-term health risks and any risk of chronic diseases.
The rapporteur also wanted to place emphasis on the prevention and early diagnosis of any harmful health effects and on the prevention of any long-term health risks and any risk of chronic diseases.
These considerations should underpin the text of the directive as a whole.
These considerations should underpin the text of the directive as a whole.
Accordingly, the protection of workers is based on two principles: the principle of prevention and the principle of taking immediate action to tackle adverse effects if, in spite of everything, the exposure limit values are exceeded.
Accordingly, the protection of workers is based on two principles: the principle of prevention and the principle of taking immediate action to tackle adverse effects if, in spite of everything, the exposure limit values are exceeded.
Finally, the rapporteur has sought to improve the text of the common position with regard to the level of protection of workers from optical radiation from natural sources in the full awareness that such protection depends not only on the measures taken by the employer to protect his workers but also awareness on the part of employees.
Finally, the rapporteur has sought to improve the text of the common position with regard to the level of protection of workers from optical radiation from natural sources in the full awareness that such protection depends not only on the measures taken by the employer to protect his workers but also awareness on the part of employees.
In this context, the definition of any obligations on the employer to assess risks to health and safety arising from natural sources of optical radiations shall belong to the regulatory competence of the Member States.
In this context, the definition of any obligations on the employer to assess risks to health and safety arising from natural sources of optical radiations shall belong to the regulatory competence of the Member States.
In conclusion, the rapporteur believes that the directive, with the amendments proposed, will adequately protect workers from optical radiation from natural and artificial sources, while safeguarding the competitiveness of firms, including SME.
In conclusion, the rapporteur believes that the directive, with the amendments proposed, will adequately protect workers from optical radiation from natural and artificial sources, while safeguarding the competitiveness of firms, including SME.
Datum prvního čtení EP – P[5]
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P
EMPL 12.5.2005
EMPL 12.5.2005
Csaba Őry 26.7.2004
Csaba Őry 26.7.2004
Jan Andersson, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Mary Lou McDonald, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Jiří Maštálka, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Kathy Sinnott, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker
Jan Andersson, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Mary Lou McDonald, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Jiří Maštálka, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Kathy Sinnott, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker
o úloze územní soudržnosti pro regionální rozvoj
on the role of territorial cohesion in regional development
PE 355.774v02-00
PE 355.774v02-00
– s ohledem na Smlouvu o Evropské unii a na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství ve znění Jednotného evropského aktu a Amsterdamské smlouvy, Maastrichtské smlouvy a Niceské smlouvy, a zejména na články 158 a 159 Smlouvy o založení Evropského společenství,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by the Single European Act and the Treaties of Maastricht, Amsterdam and Nice, and in particular Articles 158 and 159 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
– s ohledem na svá usnesení ze dne 7. února 2002
– having regard to its resolutions of 7 February 2002
C 284 E, 21.11.2002, s. 329. o druhé zprávě Komise o hospodářské a sociální soudržnosti a ze dne 22. dubna 2004
329. and 22 April 2004
C 104 E, 30.4.2004, s. 1000. o třetí zprávě Komise v téže věci,
1000. respectively on the Commission’s Second and Third reports on economic and social cohesion,
– s ohledem na usnesení z 2. září 2003
– having regard to its resolution of 2 September 2003
C 76 E, 25.3.2004, s. 111 o strukturálně znevýhodněných regionech ( ostrovy , horské oblasti , oblasti s malou hustotou obyvatelstva ) v rámci politiky soudržnosti a institucionálních perspektiv ,
111. on structurally disadvantaged regions (islands, mountain regions, regions with low population density) in the context of cohesion policy, and their institutional prospects,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 29. června 1995
– having regard to its resolution of 29 June 1995
C 183, 17.7.1995, s. 39. o dokumentu Komise s názvem „Evropa 2000+ - spolupráce při územním rozvoji Evropy“,
39. on the Commission document ‘Europe 2000+, Cooperation for European territorial development’,
– s ohledem na Perspektivu evropského územního rozvoje (SDEC) přijatou v Postupimi v roce 1999 na neformálním jednání ministrů odpovědných za územní plánování,
– having regard to the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) adopted in Potsdam in 1999 by the Informal Council of EU Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning,
– s ohledem na Bílou knihu o evropské správě věcí veřejných, kterou Komise přijala v červenci 2001,
– having regard to the White Paper on European Governance adopted by the Commission in July 2001,
– s ohledem na stanovisko Výboru regionů ze dne 10. dubna 2003 k „Územní soudržnosti v Evropě",
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 10 April 2003 on “Territorial cohesion in Europe”,
– s ohledem na zprávu Monitorovací sítě pro evropské územní plánování (ESPON) z roku 2004 o územní soudržnosti a na průběžnou zprávu z jara 2005 s názvem „ Vyhledávání územních možností “,
– having regard to the reports of the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON), including that of 2004 on territorial cohesion and the spring 2005 interim report entitled ‘In search of territorial potentials’,
– s ohledem na studii z února 2005 o „Budoucnosti politiky soudržnosti“, kterou vypracovala skupina Notre Europe na žádost Výboru pro regionální rozvoj,
– having regard to the study carried out in February 2005 by Notre Europe, at the request of the Committee on Regional Development, on the future of the cohesion policy,
– s ohledem na závěry z neformálního jednání na téma „Územní plánování“ dne 29. listopadu 2004 v Rotterdamu,
– having regard to the conclusions of the informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning held on 29 November 2004 in Rotterdam,
– s ohledem na závěry neformální Rady ministrů odpovědných za regionální politiku a územní soudržnost ve dnech 20. a 21. května 2005 a s ohledem na svůj projekt na vypracování dokumentu nazvaného „ Stav území a perspektivy Evropské unie“ do roku 2007,
– having regard to the conclusions of the informal Council of Ministers on regional policy and territorial cohesion of 20 and 21 May 2005, and its intention to draft by 2007 a document entitled ‘The Territorial State and Perspectives of the European Union’,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro regionální rozvoj ( A6‑0251/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0251/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že soudržnost představuje jeden ze strategických cílů Unie, jelikož se snaží o podporu harmonického a vyváženého rozvoje území jako celku a protože po rozšíření musí Unie ještě více zvýšit účinnost politiky soudržnosti s přihlédnutím k mnohem větším rozdílům, jež existují ve Společenství 25 členských států,
A. whereas cohesion, since it aims to promote harmonious and uniform development throughout the territory of the EU, represents one of the strategic objectives of the Union, and whereas, following enlargement, the Union must further enhance the effectiveness of cohesion policy, given the much greater disparities which are becoming apparent in the Community of 25 Member States,
B. vzhledem k tomu, že se ( vypouští se ) územní soudržnost stala novým cílem Unie a obohacuje cíl hospodářské a sociální soudržnosti tím, že jí dává nový rozměr procházející napříč celým územím a všemi politikami Společenství ,
B. whereas territorial cohesion is becoming a new objective of the Union and enriches the objective of economic and social cohesion by giving it a transversal dimension applicable to the whole territory and all Community policies,
C. vzhledem k tomu, že politika územní soudržnosti na úrovni Společenství je pro rozvoj Unie rozhodující a přináší základní „přidanou hodnotu Společenství“, která může posílit perspektivy udržitelného rozvoje,
C. whereas a territorial cohesion policy at EU level is of crucial importance for the development of the Union by supplying a fundamental “Community Added Value,” which is capable of enhancing sustainable development prospects,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že hlavním cílem územní soudržnosti je maximální rozvoj území jako celku, aniž by došlo k zeměpisnému soustředění činností, zlepšení životních podmínek všech obyvatel, a zejména zajištění rovnosti mužů a žen,
D. whereas the ultimate aim of territorial cohesion is to ensure that the territory as a whole develops to the maximum extent, avoiding geographical concentrations of activities, and to improve the conditions of life for all those who live there, guaranteeing in particular equality between men and women,
E. vzhledem k tomu, že přírodní zdroje regionů a jejich průmyslové zhodnocení má velký význam nejen pro vývoj regionů, ale pro celou Evropskou unii, a jsou tedy prospěšné všem občanům Unie,
E. whereas regional natural resources and their industrial processing are of great importance for the development of the regions but also for the European Union as a whole, and consequently benefit all citizens of the Union,
F. vzhledem k tomu, že zahrnutí územního rozměru do politik Společenství je nezbytné a vychází ze zjištění skutečného dopadu odvětvových politik na území Unie, zejména politiky dopravy, životního prostředí, hospodářské soutěže a výzkumu,
F. whereas it is necessary to incorporate the territorial dimension into Community policies, given the real impact of sectorial policies – particularly transport, environment, competition and research policy – on the territory of the Union,
G. vzhledem k tomu, že střednědobá revize lisabonské a göteborské strategie byla relativním zklamáním, pokud jde o příležitost zahrnout územní rozměr mezi prioritní cíle Unie,
G. whereas the mid-term review of the Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies was relatively disappointing as regards the possibility of including the territorial dimension in the EU’s priority objectives,
H. vzhledem k tomu, že metoda stanovení strategických směrů Společenství pro politiku soudržnosti již obsahuje územní soudržnost jakožto rámec pomoci poskytované z fondů,
H. whereas the method for setting the Community’s strategic guidelines on cohesion policy now includes territorial cohesion as a purpose for which the Funds may intervene,
6. vyžaduje, aby se pro posílení soudržnosti přednostně bojovalo proti nepoměrným rozdílům mezi centrem a periferií a nerovnováha uvnitř téhož státu;
Urges that initial priority should be given to combatting distortions between the centre and the periphery and disparities at sub-national level, so as to strengthen cohesion;