natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropská agentura pro námořní bezpečnost – Dotace v rámci hlavy 3
European Maritime Safety Agency - Subsidy under Title 3
Evropská agentura pro námořní bezpečnost – Opatření proti znečištění
European Maritime Safety Agency - Anti pollution measures
Bezpečnost dopravy
Transport safety
06 02 04 01
06 02 04 01
Vnitřní trh a optimalizace dopravních systémů
Internal market and optimisation of transport systems
06 02 04 02
06 02 04 02
06 02 07
06 02 07
Program Marco Polo
Marco Polo programme
Evropská agentura pro železnice – Dotace v rámci hlavy 1 a 2
European Railway Agency for Safety and Interoperability - Subsidy under Titles 1 and 2
Evropská agentura pro železnice – Dotace v rámci hlavy 3
European Railway Agency for Safety and Interoperability - Subsidy under Title 3
Dozorčí orgán pro program Galileo – Dotace v rámci hlavy 1 a 2
Galileo Supervisory Authority - Subsidy under Titles 1 and 2
Dozorčí orgán pro program Galileo – Dotace v rámci hlavy 3
Galileo Supervisory Authority - Subsidy under Title 3
06 03 01
06 03 01
Finanční podpora projektů společného zájmu v oblasti transevropské dopravní sítě
Financial support for projects on common interest in the trans-European transport network
Udržitelná povrchová doprava
Sustainable surface transport
Zabezpečení dopravy
Transport safety
06 49 04 01
06 49 04 01
Bezpečnost dopravy – Výdaje na správu a řízení
Transport safety - Expenditure on administrative management
06 49 04 02
06 49 04 02
06 49 04 03
06 49 04 03
Finanční podpora projektů společného zájmu v oblasti transevropské dopravní sítě – Výdaje na správu a řízení
Financial support for projects of common interest in the trans-European transport network- Expenditure on administrative management
Bogusław Liberadzki 5.4.2005
Bogusław Liberadzki 5.4.2005
výsledek závěrečného hlasování
Result of final vote
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Patrick Louis, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Gary Titley, Georgios Toussas, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Ø Introduction
Ø Introduction
The preliminary draft budget 2006 is the last under the current Financial Perspective that expires at the end of next year 2006 and will be the second full year of budgetary expenditure of EU 25.
The preliminary draft budget 2006 is the last under the current Financial Perspective that expires at the end of next year 2006 and will be the second full year of budgetary expenditure of EU 25.
To meet the needs of an enlarged Europe facing the challenges of the re-launched Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives, the Commission proposes an overall increase in the budgetary provisions for 2006 of 6%, amounting to 1.02% of the Union's GNI.
To meet the needs of an enlarged Europe facing the challenges of the re-launched Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives, the Commission proposes an overall increase in the budgetary provisions for 2006 of 6%, amounting to 1.02% of the Union's GNI.
It should be recalled that under the current Financial Perspective the ceiling for commitment appropriations
It should be recalled that under the current Financial Perspective the ceiling for commitment appropriations
Commitment appropriations cover the total cost of legal commitments entered into during a given financial year and/or previous financial years. is EUR 123.5 billion or 1.12% of GNI and that for payment appropriations it is EUR 119.1 billion or 1.08% GNI.
Commitment appropriations cover the total cost of legal commitments entered into during a given financial year and/or previous financial years. is EUR 123.5 billion or 1.12% of GNI and that for payment appropriations it is EUR 119.1 billion or 1.08% GNI.
The proposed 2006 budget, based as it is on a realistic estimates of needs, amounts to approximately 1.02% of GNI in payment appropriations and is therefore well within the imposed ceiling.
The proposed 2006 budget, based as it is on a realistic estimates of needs, amounts to approximately 1.02% of GNI in payment appropriations and is therefore well within the imposed ceiling.
The priorities of the Union are clearly established and condition the 2006 budget accordingly.
The priorities of the Union are clearly established and condition the 2006 budget accordingly.
Thus, in order to achieve the aims of the Lisbon Strategy, the accent is on strengthening efforts in Research, Education and Training, Mobility, Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) the TENs and Regional Policy.
Thus, in order to achieve the aims of the Lisbon Strategy, the accent is on strengthening efforts in Research, Education and Training, Mobility, Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) the TENs and Regional Policy.
Of course Regional Policy itself is central to the achievement of the Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives for it is within the regions that actions to promote education, job and gender equality, and assistance to SMEs are effectively put into practice.
Of course Regional Policy itself is central to the achievement of the Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives for it is within the regions that actions to promote education, job and gender equality, and assistance to SMEs are effectively put into practice.
Ø Regional Development fund
Ø Regional Development fund
In 2006 payment appropriations rise by 9.2% to meet outstanding commitments made earlier during the programming period 2000 - 2006.
In 2006 payment appropriations rise by 9.2% to meet outstanding commitments made earlier during the programming period 2000 - 2006.
see IP/05 27 April 2005 This reflects an expectation that payment needs for EU 15 in 2006 will be higher than in 2005.
see IP/05 27 April 2005 This reflects an expectation that payment needs for EU 15 in 2006 will be higher than in 2005.
As can be expected, Regional Policy resources are heavily concentrated on the least prosperous regions, where growth potential is highest but public funds may be lacking.
As can be expected, Regional Policy resources are heavily concentrated on the least prosperous regions, where growth potential is highest but public funds may be lacking.
Appropriations for these regions are in accordance with the Copenhagen Agreement and the increase in 2006 is 8.6%.
Appropriations for these regions are in accordance with the Copenhagen Agreement and the increase in 2006 is 8.6%.
The overall increase in the Structural Funds budget is 3% compared with 2005.
The overall increase in the Structural Funds budget is 3% compared with 2005.
About 66% of the increase is accounted for by new structural commitments arising as payments are phased in for the 10 Member States that joined the Union in 2004.
About 66% of the increase is accounted for by new structural commitments arising as payments are phased in for the 10 Member States that joined the Union in 2004.
For EU 15, payment appropriations correspond to 95% of average year's commitments for objectives 1 and 2 and 90% for Community initiatives.
For EU 15, payment appropriations correspond to 95% of average year's commitments for objectives 1 and 2 and 90% for Community initiatives.
These rates are the same as those of the 2005 PDB.
These rates are the same as those of the 2005 PDB.
Comparable rates of execution for mainstream projects in 2003 and 2004 were 78% and 88 % respectively whilst for initiatives they were 31% and 79%.
Comparable rates of execution for mainstream projects in 2003 and 2004 were 78% and 88 % respectively whilst for initiatives they were 31% and 79%.
Ø The cohesion fund
Ø The cohesion fund
The Cohesion Fund will see a significant increase in commitment funds of approximately 35% for the New Member States when compared with 2005.
The Cohesion Fund will see a significant increase in commitment funds of approximately 35% for the New Member States when compared with 2005.
The increase derives from the Copenhagen Agreement.
The increase derives from the Copenhagen Agreement.
Other cohesion countries however, see a slight reduction in commitment appropriations.
Other cohesion countries however, see a slight reduction in commitment appropriations.
This is partly accounted for by Ireland's loss of eligibility in 2004.
This is partly accounted for by Ireland's loss of eligibility in 2004.
Ø Northern Ireland Peace programme
Ø Northern Ireland Peace programme
At the time of agreement on the 2005 Budget it was agreed that EUR 16 million would be re-allocated from the technical assistance and innovative actions envelope to the PEACE programme.
At the time of agreement on the 2005 Budget it was agreed that EUR 16 million would be re-allocated from the technical assistance and innovative actions envelope to the PEACE programme.
The 2006 PDB proposes to allocate EUR 28 million to PEACE, the additional EUR 12 million coming from the technical assistance envelope.
The 2006 PDB proposes to allocate EUR 28 million to PEACE, the additional EUR 12 million coming from the technical assistance envelope.
Source: DG Budget EC.
Source: DG Budget EC.
Ø RAL
Ø RAL
RAL = All outstanding commitments which remain to be paid. once the conditions for payment have been fulfilled. ,
RAL = All outstanding commitments which remain to be paid. once the conditions for payment have been fulfilled. ,
It should perhaps be emphasised that RAL is a normal consequence of multi-annual programmes.
It should perhaps be emphasised that RAL is a normal consequence of multi-annual programmes.
A comparison of the RAL as at 31/12/2003 and 31/12/2004 shows a correlation between the increase in objective 1 and cohesion RAL
A comparison of the RAL as at 31/12/2003 and 31/12/2004 shows a correlation between the increase in objective 1 and cohesion RAL
6.8% and 42.2% respectively and the increase for new Member States
6.8% and 42.2% respectively and the increase for new Member States
During the same period the RAL of the pre-2000 programmes was reduced from EUR 9.2 billion to EUR 3.3 billion.
During the same period the RAL of the pre-2000 programmes was reduced from EUR 9.2 billion to EUR 3.3 billion.
In 2006, if execution is in line with proposed payments, the outstanding RAL is expected to increase by 10% or approximately EUR 6 billion .This reflects the fact that proposed payments are less than 100% of 2006 commitments for EU 15 and are around 50% of 2006 commitments for the New Members States.
In 2006, if execution is in line with proposed payments, the outstanding RAL is expected to increase by 10% or approximately EUR 6 billion .This reflects the fact that proposed payments are less than 100% of 2006 commitments for EU 15 and are around 50% of 2006 commitments for the New Members States.
The Commission's request for increases in the PDB 2006 is based on estimates of commitments and payments calculated on the one hand by reference to the Copenhagen Council figures and on the other by reference to 95% of average year's commitments.
The Commission's request for increases in the PDB 2006 is based on estimates of commitments and payments calculated on the one hand by reference to the Copenhagen Council figures and on the other by reference to 95% of average year's commitments.
These objective criteria should ensure optimal management of resources.
These objective criteria should ensure optimal management of resources.
It is therefore your draftswoman's opinion that these figures should be maintained and any arbitrary reduction by Council be rejected.
It is therefore your draftswoman's opinion that these figures should be maintained and any arbitrary reduction by Council be rejected.
Your draftswoman therefore reserves the right to introduce any amendments to the draft budget when adopted by Council as may be required to ensure that sufficient resources are available for the full implementation of EU Structural Policy.
Your draftswoman therefore reserves the right to introduce any amendments to the draft budget when adopted by Council as may be required to ensure that sufficient resources are available for the full implementation of EU Structural Policy.
Creation of a new budget line in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of a network of organisations of Small and Medium Sized enterprises.
Creation of a new budget line in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of a network of organisations of Small and Medium Sized enterprises.
The European Union recognises the unique role of SMEs in achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy.
The European Union recognises the unique role of SMEs in achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy.
The ongoing enlargement of the EU is unique in attempting to successfully integrate into the European and global economy economies which for the major part of the 20th century were the victims of a failed economic and social experiment.
The ongoing enlargement of the EU is unique in attempting to successfully integrate into the European and global economy economies which for the major part of the 20th century were the victims of a failed economic and social experiment.
EU 25 will in all probability expand further over the period 2007 - 2013.
EU 25 will in all probability expand further over the period 2007 - 2013.
The collapse of the Soviet empire and the adoption by the majority of its Members of a free market economy has led to an awareness of the need to invest in improving cross-border co-operation, not only within the Union but also with its direct neighbours.
The collapse of the Soviet empire and the adoption by the majority of its Members of a free market economy has led to an awareness of the need to invest in improving cross-border co-operation, not only within the Union but also with its direct neighbours.
It is in recognition of this that the European Commission has proposed the creation of the EGCC .
It is in recognition of this that the European Commission has proposed the creation of the EGCC .
Whilst the countries concerned, including candidate countries, have shown their ability to quickly adapt to the constraints and benefit s of an ever changing free market economy, the newly formed SMEs which form the backbone of their economies can undoubtedly benefit from exchanging knowledge and experiences with well-established companies in EU 15.
Whilst the countries concerned, including candidate countries, have shown their ability to quickly adapt to the constraints and benefit s of an ever changing free market economy, the newly formed SMEs which form the backbone of their economies can undoubtedly benefit from exchanging knowledge and experiences with well-established companies in EU 15.
At present, SMEs do not possess the infrastructure necessary to easily promote such exchanges and best practice.
At present, SMEs do not possess the infrastructure necessary to easily promote such exchanges and best practice.
It is for this reason that your rapporteur has proposed the creation of a new budget line (130315) in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of a network of organisations of small and medium sized organisations .
It is for this reason that your rapporteur has proposed the creation of a new budget line (130315) in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of a network of organisations of small and medium sized organisations .
Your rapporteur contends that the relatively small financial resources required for this budget line, which would be limited in an initial period to EUR 500,000 in commitment appropriations and EUR 250,000 in payment appropriations, could be found from the technical assistance envelope in the same way as extra funding has been found for the Northern Ireland Peace initiative.
Your rapporteur contends that the relatively small financial resources required for this budget line, which would be limited in an initial period to EUR 500,000 in commitment appropriations and EUR 250,000 in payment appropriations, could be found from the technical assistance envelope in the same way as extra funding has been found for the Northern Ireland Peace initiative.
In summary, your draftswoman would recommend that the committee supports her proposal to maintain the appropriations proposed and justified by the Commission in the PDB as well as the creation of the new budget line (130315) in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of an organisation of SMEs to improve networking skills.
In summary, your draftswoman would recommend that the committee supports her proposal to maintain the appropriations proposed and justified by the Commission in the PDB as well as the creation of the new budget line (130315) in the 2006 budget to assist in financing the creation of an organisation of SMEs to improve networking skills.
Výbor pro regionální rozvoj vyzývá Rozpočtový výbor jako příslušný výbor, aby do svého usnesení začlenil následující návrhy:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. vyjadřuje politování nad skutečností, že Rada pouze na základě účetnictví a bez zohlednění politických priorit přijala paušální snížení výdajů o 150 milionů EUR v oblasti regionální politiky;
Regrets that on an accounting basis only, and without taking account of political priorities, the Council has adopted an across-the-board reduction of EUR 150 million in regional policy expenditure;
Article Item
Article Item
Appropriations 2006
Appropriations 2006
Appropriations 2005
Appropriations 2005
European Regional Development Fund and other regional interventions
European Regional Development Fund and other regional interventions
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Objective 1
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Objective 1
17 517 005 689
17 517 005 689
14 446 709 721
14 446 709 721
16 878 716 322
16 878 716 322
12 726 961 549
12 726 961 549
15 793 919 824,—
15 793 919 824,—
12 594 258 722,94
12 594 258 722,94
Article 13 03 01 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 01 — Subtotal
Special programme for peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland
Special programme for peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland and the border counties of Ireland
17 080 000
17 080 000
72 796 901
72 796 901
30 500 000
30 500 000
51 672 096
51 672 096
71 198 968,—
71 198 968,—
59 533 947,92
59 533 947,92
Article 13 03 02 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 02 — Subtotal
Completion of earlier programmes — Objective 1
Completion of earlier programmes — Objective 1
27 150 888
27 150 888
1 007 126 784,06
1 007 126 784,06
Article 13 03 03 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 03 — Subtotal
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Objective 2
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Objective 2
3 039 945 977
3 039 945 977
2 802 509 908
2 802 509 908
3 145 689 964
3 145 689 964
3 435 789 185
3 435 789 185
3 265 987 540,21
3 265 987 540,21
3 475 818 480,72
3 475 818 480,72
Article 13 03 04 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 04 — Subtotal
Completion of earlier programmes — Objective 2
Completion of earlier programmes — Objective 2
11 373 257
11 373 257
213 422 052,28
213 422 052,28
Article 13 03 05 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 05 — Subtotal
134 267 691
134 267 691
85 322 361
85 322 361
131 887 810
131 887 810
63 328 096
63 328 096
128 975 916,—
128 975 916,—
89 051 974,03
89 051 974,03
Article 13 03 06 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 06 — Subtotal
Completion of earlier programmes — Community initiatives
Completion of earlier programmes — Community initiatives
15 763 812
15 763 812
467 425 577,81
467 425 577,81
Article 13 03 07 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 07 — Subtotal
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Technical assistance and innovative measures
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Technical assistance and innovative measures
45 613 067
45 613 067
53 511 147
53 511 147
124 000 000
124 000 000
38 388 494,82
38 388 494,82
49 057 335,11
49 057 335,11
Article 13 03 08 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 08 — Subtotal
Completion of earlier programmes — Technical assistance and innovation measures
Completion of earlier programmes — Technical assistance and innovation measures
479 982
479 982
9 878 901,82
9 878 901,82
Article 13 03 09 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 09 — Subtotal
Completion of other regional measures
Completion of other regional measures
4 342,29
4 342,29
Article 13 03 10 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 10 — Subtotal
Programme for the modernisation of the textile and clothing industry in Portugal
Programme for the modernisation of the textile and clothing industry in Portugal
2 084 589,98
2 084 589,98
Article 13 03 11 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 11 — Subtotal
Community contribution to the International Fund for Ireland
Community contribution to the International Fund for Ireland
15 000 000,—
15 000 000,—
Article 13 03 12 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 12 — Subtotal
Interreg III Community initiative
Interreg III Community initiative
1 156 863 141
1 156 863 141
819 527 006
819 527 006
1 109 963 603
1 109 963 603
581 274 945
581 274 945
1 069 779 081,—
1 069 779 081,—
538 279 896,31
538 279 896,31
Article 13 03 13 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 13 — Subtotal
Support for regions bordering candidate countries
Support for regions bordering candidate countries
17 784 252
17 784 252
4 601 750,11
4 601 750,11
Article 13 03 14 — Subtotal
Article 13 03 14 — Subtotal
Chapter 13 03 — Total
Chapter 13 03 — Total
21 925 775 565
21 925 775 565
18 396 633 836
18 396 633 836
21 365 268 846
21 365 268 846
17 135 810 123
17 135 810 123
20 383 249 824,03
20 383 249 824,03
18 525 544 355,38
18 525 544 355,38
6 026 582 110
6 026 582 110
3 500 000 000
3 500 000 000
5 126 432 989
5 126 432 989
3 000 000 000
3 000 000 000
5 628 109 995,96
5 628 109 995,96
2 642 101 717,53
2 642 101 717,53
Article 13 04 01 — Subtotal
Article 13 04 01 — Subtotal
Chapter 13 04 — Total
Chapter 13 04 — Total
Preaccession interventions related to the structural policies
Preaccession interventions related to the structural policies
13 05 01
13 05 01
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession
13 05 01 01
13 05 01 01
580 000 000
580 000 000
275 000 000
275 000 000
521 950 000
521 950 000
450 949 918,—
450 949 918,—
132 184 195,—
132 184 195,—
13 05 01 02
13 05 01 02
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession — Closure of preaccession assistance, relating to eight applicant countries
Instrument for structural policies for preaccession — Closure of preaccession assistance, relating to eight applicant countries
575 000 000
575 000 000
433 640 804,70
433 640 804,70
Article 13 05 01 — Subtotal
Article 13 05 01 — Subtotal
850 000 000
850 000 000
700 000 000
700 000 000
565 824 999,70
565 824 999,70
Chapter 13 05 — Total
Chapter 13 05 — Total
Solidarity Fund — Management
Solidarity Fund — Management
European Union Solidarity Fund — Member States
European Union Solidarity Fund — Member States
20 955 775,—
20 955 775,—
77 205 775,—
77 205 775,—
Article 13 06 01 — Subtotal
Article 13 06 01 — Subtotal
European Union Solidarity Fund — Countries negotiating for accession
European Union Solidarity Fund — Countries negotiating for accession
961 220,—
961 220,—
Article 13 06 02 — Subtotal
Article 13 06 02 — Subtotal
Chapter 13 06 — Total
Chapter 13 06 — Total
21 916 995,—
21 916 995,—
78 166 995,—
78 166 995,—
13 49
13 49
13 49 04
13 49 04