natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It is crucial that this term be correctly implemented in all versions of the text, since the Commission applies a precise definition for ‘relevant metabolites’ in the guidelines to Directive 91/414/EC
It is crucial that this term be correctly implemented in all versions of the text, since the Commission applies a precise definition for ‘relevant metabolites’ in the guidelines to Directive 91/414/EC
OJ L 230 , 19.8.1991, p.1. .
OJ L 230 , 19.8.1991, p.1. .
Příloha I, tabulka, sloupec 3, řádek 2 (nový)
Annex I, Table, column 3, row 2 (new)
Normy kvality pro podzemní vody se vztahují na všechny útvary podzemních vod s výjimkou případů, kdy jsou normy obsahu pesticidů a jejich významných metabolitů v pitné vodě přísnější než 0,1 µg/l.
The groundwater quality standard applies to all bodies of groundwater, except where drinking water standards for pesticides and their relevant metabolites are more stringent than 0.1 µg/l.
Pro tyto oblasti platí normy pro pitnou vodu.
For these areas, drinking water standards apply.
Celková koncentrace pesticidů a jejich metabolitů ve všech útvarech podzemních vod nesmí překročit 0,5 µg/l.
The total concentration of pesticides and their metabolites in all groundwater bodies shall not exceed 0.5 µg/l.
Threshold values for pesticides/metabolites in drinking water might be less than 0.1 µg/l.
Threshold values for pesticides/metabolites in drinking water might be less than 0.1 µg/l.
In such cases, the more stringent standard should apply.
In such cases, the more stringent standard should apply.
Directive 98/83/EC sets a threshold value for the sum of pesticides and related substances.
Directive 98/83/EC sets a threshold value for the sum of pesticides and related substances.
This threshold should be included in this Directive as well, in order to ensure proper protection of the groundwater.
This threshold should be included in this Directive as well, in order to ensure proper protection of the groundwater.
Příloha I, tabulka, sloupec 1 a 2 řádek 2 a (nový)
Annex I, Table, columns 1 and 2, row 2 a (new)
Normy kvality
Quality standards
Celková koncentrace pesticidu/metabolitu
Total pesticide/metabolite concentrations
0,5 µg/l
0.5 µg/l
Drinking water standards can be and are in some cases more stringent because of possible harmful health effects.
Drinking water standards can be and are in some cases more stringent because of possible harmful health effects.
Also a standard of 0.5 microgram/l for total pesticide concentrations should apply.
Also a standard of 0.5 microgram/l for total pesticide concentrations should apply.
Příloha I, poznámka pod čarou 22
Annex I, footnote 22
22 Dodržování norem bude založeno na srovnání s aritmetickým průměrem monitorovaných hodnot na každém místě odběru vzorků útvaru nebo skupiny útvarů podzemních vod označených za ohrožené na základě analýzy provedené podle článku 5 směrnice 2000/60/ES .
22 Compliance with the standards shall be based on a comparison with the arithmetic means of the monitoring values at each of the sampling points in the body or group of bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk pursuant to the analysis to be carried out under Article 5 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
22 Dodržení norem bude hodnoceno v souladu s oddílem 2.4.5 přílohy V směrnice 2000/60/ES, článkem 4a této směrnice a s právními předpisy Společenství, na jejichž základě byly normy vytvořeny.
22 Compliance with the standards shall be assessed in accordance with Section 2.4.5 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC, Article 4a of this Directive, and the Community legislation from which the standards are derived.
The Commission’s footnote means that exceedance of a quality standard at one point in a body of groundwater would result in the body being classified as poor status, even if the standard were not exceeded elsewhere in the body.
The Commission’s footnote means that exceedance of a quality standard at one point in a body of groundwater would result in the body being classified as poor status, even if the standard were not exceeded elsewhere in the body.
Such a “one-out all-out” approach would cause many groundwater bodies to be classified as “poor” on account of very localised exceedances, resulting in a misleading view of the overall quality of groundwater and inconsistency with the Water Framework Directive and other Community legislation (e.g. the Nitrates Directive).
Such a “one-out all-out” approach would cause many groundwater bodies to be classified as “poor” on account of very localised exceedances, resulting in a misleading view of the overall quality of groundwater and inconsistency with the Water Framework Directive and other Community legislation (e.g. the Nitrates Directive).
This amendment (with the amendment to Article 4) would ensure that classification represents the overall quality of the groundwater body.
This amendment (with the amendment to Article 4) would ensure that classification represents the overall quality of the groundwater body.
(Localised pollution “hotspots” can be addressed through trend reversal and pollution prevention/limitation measures and should only affect status where they are sufficiently important to affect the objectives of “good status”.
(Localised pollution “hotspots” can be addressed through trend reversal and pollution prevention/limitation measures and should only affect status where they are sufficiently important to affect the objectives of “good status”.
POSUZOVÁNÍ CHEMICKÉHO STAVU PODZEMNÍCH VOD, POKUD JDE O ZNEČIŠŤUJÍCÍ LÁTKY, PRO KTERÉ NEEXISTUJÍ NORMY KVALITY STANOVENÉ SPOLEČENSTVÍM
ASSESSMENT OF GROUNDWATER CHEMICAL STATUS FOR POLLUTANTS FOR WHICH COMMUNITY QUALITY STANDARDS DO NOT EXIST
d) předpokládaná množství a koncentrace znečišťujících látek, které se přenášejí z útvaru podzemních vod do souvisejících ekosystémů povrchových vod a/nebo závislých suchozemských ekosystémů;
Common criteria for the establishment of QUALITY STANDARDS for assessing groundwater chemical status
Normy kvality pro podzemní vody budou členské státy stanovovat na základě:
Groundwater quality standards shall be derived by Member States on the basis of the following issues:
i) charakteristik útvaru nebo útvarů podzemních vod, ve vztahu k nimž se budou používat normy kvality,
(i) the characteristics of the body or bodies of groundwater in relation to which the quality standards shall be used;
ii) vlastností sledovaných znečišťujících látek; a
(ii) the properties of the pollutants concerned; and
iii) umístění monitorovaných míst.
(iii) the location of the monitoring points.
Norma kvality pro podzemní vody představuje koncentraci znečišťující látky, jejíž překročení znamená nebezpečí, že:
(d) the estimated amounts and the concentrations of the pollutants transferred from the body of groundwater to the associated surface waters and/or dependent terrestrial ecosystems;
b) zásoby pitné vody nejsou chráněny v souladu s článkem 7 směrnice 2000/60/ES.
(b) drinking water supplies are not being protected in accordance with Article 7 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
The amendment strengthens and simplifies the Commission’s proposed common procedure for deriving threshold values.
The amendment strengthens and simplifies the Commission’s proposed common procedure for deriving threshold values.
It requires Member States to focus on what is important to the particular groundwater body, the risks posed by pollutants, and how the threshold value is measured.
It requires Member States to focus on what is important to the particular groundwater body, the risks posed by pollutants, and how the threshold value is measured.
It also links the setting of threshold values to the WFD meaning of “good status”, and adds a condition to protect drinking water sources in accordance with the WFD.
It also links the setting of threshold values to the WFD meaning of “good status”, and adds a condition to protect drinking water sources in accordance with the WFD.
To introduce common standards would be to ignore the variability of the natural quality of groundwater not only between, but also within, aquifers (eg. chloride can vary naturally from 20 mg/l to over 10,000 mg/l within a distance of 10km ).
To introduce common standards would be to ignore the variability of the natural quality of groundwater not only between, but also within, aquifers (eg. chloride can vary naturally from 20 mg/l to over 10,000 mg/l within a distance of 10km ).
Groundwater’s roles in supporting ecosystems and other uses also varies.
Groundwater’s roles in supporting ecosystems and other uses also varies.
Imposing common standards would be like standardising shoes to a single size and design.
Imposing common standards would be like standardising shoes to a single size and design.
Sometimes they would be too tight, sometimes too loose
Sometimes they would be too tight, sometimes too loose
Příloha III, část B, úvodní část
Annex III, Part B, introduction
V souladu s článkem 4 a oddílem 1 přílohy II této směrnice členské státy poskytnou o každé ze znečišťujících látek charakteristické pro ohrožené útvary podzemních vod a která byla uvedena v národních normách kvality pro podzemní vody pro označení dobrý chemický stav , alespoň tyto informace:
In accordance with Article 4 and section 1 of Annex II to this Directive, for each of the pollutants that characterise bodies of groundwater as being at risk, and were introduced for national quality standards relating to good chemical status, Member States shall provide as a minimum the following information:
Amendment follows from the amended Article and the amended Annex II.
Amendment follows from the amended Article and the amended Annex II.
Příloha III, část B, bod 1.1
Annex III, Part B, point 1.1
1.1 Údaje o počtu útvarů podzemních vod, které jsou mimo jiné kvůli těmto vybraným znečišťujícím látkám označeny za ohrožené.
1.1 Information on the number of bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk in which the selected pollutants contribute to this classification.
1.1 Údaje o počtu útvarů podzemních vod, které jsou označeny za ohrožené kvůli znečišťujícím látkám, pro které byly na národní úrovni stanoveny normy kvality pro podzemní vody.
1.1 Information on the number of bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk in which pollutants occur for which groundwater quality standards have been laid down at national level.
This addition is to clarify that, when this Directive is issued, it does not mean that the entire report for 2005 will have to be revised.
This addition is to clarify that, when this Directive is issued, it does not mean that the entire report for 2005 will have to be revised.
Reporting will be required only for those bodies of groundwater and parameters for which national quality standards have been laid down.
Reporting will be required only for those bodies of groundwater and parameters for which national quality standards have been laid down.
Příloha III, část B, bod 1.2
Annex III, Part B, point 1.2
1.2 Údaje o každém z útvarů podzemních vod označeném za ohrožený, zejména o velikosti vodního útvaru, o vztazích mezi útvary podzemních vod a souvisejícími povrchovými vodami a závislými suchozemskými ekosystémy, a v případě přirozeně se vyskytujících látek jejich základní hodnoty v útvarech podzemních vod.
1.2 Information on each of the bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk, in particular the size of the bodies, the relationship between the bodies of groundwater and the associated surface waters and dependent terrestrial ecosystems and, in case of naturally occurring substances, the background levels in the bodies of groundwater.
1.2 Údaje o každém z útvarů podzemních vod označeném z tohoto důvodu za ohrožený, zejména o velikosti vodního útvaru, o vztazích mezi útvary podzemních vod a souvisejícími povrchovými vodami a závislými suchozemskými ekosystémy, o využití podzemních vod jako zdroje vody pro lidskou spotřebu , a v případě přirozeně se vyskytujících látek jejich základní hodnoty v útvarech podzemních vod.
1.2 Information on each of the bodies of groundwater characterised as being at risk for that reason, in particular the size of the bodies, the relationship between the bodies of groundwater and the associated surface waters and dependent terrestrial ecosystems, the use of groundwater as a source of water for human consumption, and, in case of naturally occurring substances, the background levels in the bodies of groundwater.
This addition is to clarify that when this Directive is issued it does not mean that the entire report for 2005 will have to be revised.
This addition is to clarify that when this Directive is issued it does not mean that the entire report for 2005 will have to be revised.
Because groundwater is the main source of drinking water in the European Union, Member States should indicate whether a body of groundwater characterised as being at risk can also be used as a source of drinking water, as required by Article 7(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Because groundwater is the main source of drinking water in the European Union, Member States should indicate whether a body of groundwater characterised as being at risk can also be used as a source of drinking water, as required by Article 7(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC.
Příloha III, část B, bod 2, úvodní část
Annex III, Part B, point 2, introduction
Informace o stanovení prahových hodnot
Information on the establishment of threshold values
Informace o stanovení norem kvality pro podzemní vody
Information on the establishment of groundwater quality standards
Amendment follows from previous changes.
Amendment follows from previous changes.
Pozměňovací návrh
Amendment 70
2.1 Prahové hodnoty , které platí na národní úrovni nebo na úrovni povodí nebo jednotlivých útvarů podzemních vod či skupin útvarů podzemních vod.
2.1 The threshold values , whether they apply at the national level, or at the level of the river basin district, or for individual bodies or groups of bodies of groundwater.
2.1 Normy kvality pro podzemní vody , které platí na národní úrovni nebo na úrovni povodí nebo jednotlivých útvarů podzemních vod či skupin útvarů podzemních vod.
2.1 The groundwater quality standards , whether they apply at the national level, or at the level of the river basin district, or for individual bodies or groups of bodies of groundwater.
Příloha III část B odstavec 2.2
Annex III, Part B, point 2.2
2.2 Vztah mezi prahovými hodnotami a zjištěnými základními hodnotami v případě přirozeně se vyskytujících látek.
2.2 The relationship between the threshold values and, in the case of naturally occurring substances, the observed background levels.
2.2 Vztah mezi normami kvality pro podzemní vody a zjištěnými základními hodnotami v případě přirozeně se vyskytujících látek.
2.2 The relationship between the groundwater quality standards and, in the case of naturally occurring substances, the observed background levels.
Tam, kde nejsou známy základní hodnoty přirozeně se vyskytující látek v podzemích vodách, budou základní hodnoty stanoveny na základě nejlepšího odborného odhadu.
Where there are no known background levels in groundwater for naturally occurring substances, the background levels shall be established according to the best professional estimate.
In a number of cases the background level will not be known until after prolonged monitoring - for some groups of bodies of groundwater it may also be difficult to find bodies of such water where a natural background level can be measured.
In a number of cases the background level will not be known until after prolonged monitoring - for some groups of bodies of groundwater it may also be difficult to find bodies of such water where a natural background level can be measured.
In both eventualities it will be necessary to establish background levels on the basis of qualified professional estimates .
In both eventualities it will be necessary to establish background levels on the basis of qualified professional estimates .
Příloha III, část B, bod 2.3
Annex III, Part B, point 2.3
2.3 Způsob, jakým byly při stanovení prahových hodnot zohledněny hospodářské a sociální náklady.
2.3 The manner in which economic and social costs were taken into account in establishing the threshold values.
Taking into account the costs should not be a factor at this point.
Taking into account the costs should not be a factor at this point.
According to legal principles, the costs should be taken into account when the measures are taken.
According to legal principles, the costs should be taken into account when the measures are taken.
Příloha IV, bod 1.1
Annex IV, point 1.1
1.1 V souladu s oddílem 2.4 přílohy V směrnice 2000/60/ES se monitorovací program zaměřuje na odhalení všech významných a trvale vzestupných trendů koncentrací znečišťujících látek uvedených v článku 4 této směrnice.
1.1 In accordance with Section 2.4 of Annex V to Directive 2000/60/EC, the monitoring programme shall be adjusted to detect any significant and sustained upward trends of concentrations of the pollutants identified pursuant to Article 4 of this Directive.
Amendment follows from amended Articles.
Amendment follows from amended Articles.
Příloha IV, bod 1.2 a)
Annex IV, point 1.2 (a)
a) posuzování je založeno na hodnotách aritmetického průměru průměrných hodnot jednotlivých monitorovacích míst ve všech útvarech nebo skupinách útvarů podzemních vod stanovených výpočty na základě čtvrtletní, pololetní nebo roční četnosti monitorování.
(a) the assessment shall be based on arithmetic mean values of the mean values of the individual monitoring points in each bodies or groups of bodies of groundwater bodies , as calculated on the basis of a quarterly, a half-yearly or an annual monitoring frequency.
a) vyhodnocení hodnot naměřených v rámci monitorovacího programu je založeno na analýze trendů dle statistického postupu s použitím hodnot aritmetického průměru za sledované období v jednotlivých místech měření ve všech útvarech nebo skupinách útvarů podzemních vod stanovených výpočty na základě čtvrtletní, pololetní nebo roční četnosti monitorování.
(a) the evaluation of the measurements obtained from the monitoring programme shall be based on an analysis of trends in accordance with a statistical procedure using the arithmetic mean values during the sampling period at each individual measurement point in each body or group of bodies of groundwater , as calculated on the basis of a quarterly, a half-yearly or an annual monitoring frequency.
Je nutno zajistit srovnatelnost monitorovacích míst.
It is necessary to ensure that the monitoring points are comparable.
Taking the mean value of the mean value of pollution for each body of groundwater at the measurement point results in a 'massaging' of pollution trends.
Taking the mean value of the mean value of pollution for each body of groundwater at the measurement point results in a 'massaging' of pollution trends.
Research has shown that even massive pollution disappears as a result of using double mean values.
Research has shown that even massive pollution disappears as a result of using double mean values.
Checks at yearly intervals are insufficient.
Checks at yearly intervals are insufficient.
There are considerable differences in the natural chemical composition of groundwater, not only between different groundwater bodies, but also within the same groundwater body.
There are considerable differences in the natural chemical composition of groundwater, not only between different groundwater bodies, but also within the same groundwater body.
For example, there are chemical differences between groundwater close to the surface and groundwater at greater depth.
For example, there are chemical differences between groundwater close to the surface and groundwater at greater depth.
Accordingly, a proper assessment requires the monitoring points to be comparable, for example with regard to geological conditions.
Accordingly, a proper assessment requires the monitoring points to be comparable, for example with regard to geological conditions.
Příloha IV, bod 1.2 b)
Annex IV, point 1.2 (b)
b) aby se předešlo zkreslení identifikace trendu, jsou z výpočtu vyloučena všechna měření pod hranicí kvantifikace .
(b) in order to avoid bias in trend identification, all measurements below the limit of quantification shall be eliminated for the calculation.
b) aby se předešlo zkreslení identifikace trendu, jsou při výpočtu všem měřením pod hranicí kvantifikace přiřazena hodnota rovnající se poloviční hodnotě hranice kvantifikace .
(b) in order to avoid bias in trend identification, all measurements below the limit of quantification shall be assigned a value of half the quantification limit for the calculation .
See Am.
See Am.
Příloha IV, bod 1.2 c), úvod
Annex IV, point 1.2 (c), introduction
c) minimální počet údajů a minimální délka období jsou stanoveny v následující tabulce.
(c) the minimum number of data values and the minimum length of time series are laid down in the following table.
Období nesmí být delší 15 let.
The time series shall not exceed 15 years.
Období nesmí být delší než šest let.
The time series shall not exceed six years.
If new periods of time are to be laid down, they should coincide with the 6 year schedule already set.
If new periods of time are to be laid down, they should coincide with the 6 year schedule already set.
Příloha IV, bod 1.2 c), tabulka, sloupec 2, řádek 1
Annex IV, point 1.2 (c), Table, Column 2, Row 1
Četnost monitorování Min. počet let
Monitoring Minimum number frequency of years
Ročně 8
Annual 8
Ročně 6
Annual 6
Příloha IV, bod 1.2 c), tabulka, sloupec 3
Annex IV, point 1.2 (c), Table, Column 3
Četnost Maximální
Monitoring Maximum
monitorování počet let
frequency number of years
ročně 15
Annual 15
pololetně 15
Half-yearly 15
čtvrtletně 15
Quarterly 15
Pololetně 6
Half-yearly 6
Čtvrtletně 6
Quarterly 6
Příloha IV, bod 1.4
Annex IV, point 1.4
1.4 V případě relevantních znečišťujících látek v útvarech podzemních vod, které jsou zasažené bodovými zdroji znečištění, včetně bodových zdrojů z minulosti, se provádí zvláštní hodnocení trendů, aby se prověřilo, zda se znečištění z místa kontaminace nešíří z dané oblasti dále a nezhoršuje chemický stav útvaru podzemních vod.
1.4 Specific trend assessment shall be carried out for relevant pollutants in bodies of groundwater that are affected by point sources of pollution, including historical point sources, in order to verify that plumes from contaminated sites do not expand over a defined area and deteriorate the chemical status of the groundwater body.
1.4 Postup pro zjištění výchozího bodu pro hodnocení trendů se stanoví na základě času, a alespoň na základě údajů z monitorování získaných podle článku 8 směrnice 2000/60/ES.
1.4 The procedure for identifying the starting point for a trend assessment shall be established on a time basis, and at the very least on the basis of monitoring data collected in accordance with Article 8 of Directive 2000/60/EC.
V tomto případě odpovídají referenční hodnoty hodnotám na počátku monitorovacího programu.
In this case, the reference points shall correspond to the start of the monitoring programme.
Pokud jsou data k dispozici již před počátkem monitorovacího programu, měla by se použít pro určení referenčních bodů pro zjištění výchozího bodu pro hodnocení trendu.
If data obtained earlier than the start of the monitoring programme exist, they should be used for establishing the reference points for the identification of the starting point for trend assessment.
Both new paragraphs are derived from paragraph 2.
Both new paragraphs are derived from paragraph 2.
The establishment of reference points can only relate to the beginning of trend assessment.
The establishment of reference points can only relate to the beginning of trend assessment.
For trend reversal, these are irrelevant.
For trend reversal, these are irrelevant.
Paragraph 1.4, in the Commission's proposed wording, relates to historical pollution, to which special national provisions should apply, and should therefore be deleted here.
Paragraph 1.4, in the Commission's proposed wording, relates to historical pollution, to which special national provisions should apply, and should therefore be deleted here.
Příloha IV, bod 1.6 a (nový)
Annex IV, point 1.6 a (new)