natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cíl IVc – Podpora mezinárodní spolupráce v oblasti ochrany spotřebitele.
Objective IVc - Promotion of international cooperation related to consumer protection
Akce 19f: Opatření pro spolupráci s mezinárodními organizacemi.
Action 19f: Measures for cooperation with international organisations.
Akce 19g: Opatření pro spolupráci se třetími zeměmi, které se neúčastní programu.
Action 19g: Measuers for co-operation with third countries which do not participate in the programme.
Akce 19h: Podpora dialogu mezi spotřebitelskými organizacemi.
Action 19h: Encouragement of dialogue between consumer organisations.
Příloha 3 sekce „Společné akce pro všechny cíle“ akce 20
Annex 3, Section "Common to all objectives", Action 20
Akce 20: Finanční příspěvky na specifické projekty na úrovni Společenství nebo na vnitrostátní úrovni za účelem uskutečnění dalších cílů spotřebitelské politiky.
Action 20: Financial contributions for specific projects at Community or national level in support of other consumer policy objectives.
Akce 20: Finanční příspěvky na specifické projekty na úrovni Společenství nebo na vnitrostátní úrovni za účelem uskutečnění cílů spotřebitelské politiky , včetně projektů na podporu přeshraniční výměny informací a nejlepších postupů .
Action 20: Financial contributions for specific projects at Community or national level in support of consumer policy objectives , including projects promoting the cross-border exchange of information and best practices .
Background to, and structure of, the new strategy and the decision proposed by the Commission
Background to, and structure of, the new strategy and the decision proposed by the Commission
A ‚programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003-2008)‘, established by Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the basis of Article 152 of the Treaty, is currently in place.
A 'programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003-2008)', established by Decision No 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on the basis of Article 152 of the Treaty, is currently in place.
Separately from this, there is also a programme of action ‚establishing a general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007‘.
Separately from this, there is also a programme of action 'establishing a general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004 to 2007'.
The decision establishing this programme, Decision No 20/2004/EC, was taken on the basis of Article 153 of the Treaty.
The decision establishing this programme, Decision No 20/2004/EC, was taken on the basis of Article 153 of the Treaty.
The Commission is proposing that these two decisions be repealed before the programmes are due to expire and replaced by an integrated programme running for seven years, beginning in 2007.
The Commission is proposing that these two decisions be repealed before the programmes are due to expire and replaced by an integrated programme running for seven years, beginning in 2007.
The Commission is convinced that its proposal to integrate the programmes will make Community policy more efficient, coherent and visible, given that both areas have certain shared objectives and similar types of actions are often used to pursue them.
The Commission is convinced that its proposal to integrate the programmes will make Community policy more efficient, coherent and visible, given that both areas have certain shared objectives and similar types of actions are often used to pursue them.
Thanks to streamlined administrative and budgetary procedures and with the help of a joint ‚executive agency‘, a joint programme would, in the Commission‘s view, ultimately deliver savings.
Thanks to streamlined administrative and budgetary procedures and with the help of a joint 'executive agency', a joint programme would, in the Commission's view, ultimately deliver savings.
In order to exploit the synergies three ‚core joint objectives‘ and six ‚common actions‘ are set out in the proposal.
In order to exploit the synergies three 'core joint objectives' and six 'common actions' are set out in the proposal.
A budget line is also proposed, with an amount of EUR 1 203 million.
A budget line is also proposed, with an amount of EUR 1 203 million.
In addition, the executive agency set up in 2004 for the public health programme is to be extended and will encompass consumer protection.
In addition, the executive agency set up in 2004 for the public health programme is to be extended and will encompass consumer protection.
In order to respond to stakeholders‘ expectations, the specific nature of the two policy areas continues to be taken into account and the programme is to retain the specific features of actions in each area and further develop them.
In order to respond to stakeholders' expectations, the specific nature of the two policy areas continues to be taken into account and the programme is to retain the specific features of actions in each area and further develop them.
Consequently, in addition to the section on common action there is also a separate section on health and a separate section on consumer policy actions and support measures.
Consequently, in addition to the section on common action there is also a separate section on health and a separate section on consumer policy actions and support measures.
Rapporteur‘s comments on the integrated action programme structure
Rapporteur's comments on the integrated action programme structure
Your rapporteur advocates splitting the integrated programme into a new consumer protection programme and a new public health programme.
Your rapporteur advocates splitting the integrated programme into a new consumer protection programme and a new public health programme.
Neither the practical nor the policy arguments in favour of integrating the aforementioned action programmes are convincing.
Neither the practical nor the policy arguments in favour of integrating the aforementioned action programmes are convincing.
The synergies aimed at will in practice be much smaller than hoped for.
The synergies aimed at will in practice be much smaller than hoped for.
And the economies of scale to which the Commission refers are nowhere demonstrated in the impact study, which runs to many pages.
And the economies of scale to which the Commission refers are nowhere demonstrated in the impact study, which runs to many pages.
Another argument against an integrated programme relates to the Commission‘s powers in the two areas, which are too different.
Another argument against an integrated programme relates to the Commission's powers in the two areas, which are too different.
The idea of integrating the programmes also does not square well with the respective social objectives of the civil society organisations involved in the two fields.
The idea of integrating the programmes also does not square well with the respective social objectives of the civil society organisations involved in the two fields.
The same applies to the way in which powers are allocated internally in the Member States, and the fact that, as a rule, they are not only spread across the various departments but, in federal states, also across various policy levels.
The same applies to the way in which powers are allocated internally in the Member States, and the fact that, as a rule, they are not only spread across the various departments but, in federal states, also across various policy levels.
Furthermore, users of public health services cannot in every respect be treated in the same way as ‚pure‘ consumers.
Furthermore, users of public health services cannot in every respect be treated in the same way as 'pure' consumers.
In addition to these substantive and institutional reasons, there are also budgetary considerations justifying keeping the two programmes separate.
In addition to these substantive and institutional reasons, there are also budgetary considerations justifying keeping the two programmes separate.
Each sector has greater certainty when it has its own budget line.
Each sector has greater certainty when it has its own budget line.
It is also striking that no one has requested this ‚merger‘ and that, in general, stakeholders (certainly on the consumer side) do not support it.
It is also striking that no one has requested this 'merger' and that, in general, stakeholders (certainly on the consumer side) do not support it.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes - in consultation with the rapporteur for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, and with the endorsement of the Conference of Presidents - that the proposal be split and that the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection look only at consumer protection.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes - in consultation with the rapporteur for the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, and with the endorsement of the Conference of Presidents - that the proposal be split and that the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection look only at consumer protection.
The following comments therefore deal solely with the consumer protection aspects of the proposed multiannual programme.
The following comments therefore deal solely with the consumer protection aspects of the proposed multiannual programme.
Rapporteur‘s comments on the action programme on consumer protection
Rapporteur's comments on the action programme on consumer protection
Article 1 establishes the programme for a seven-year period (2007-2013) as the successor to the current programme, which is repealed in Article 11.
Article 1 establishes the programme for a seven-year period (2007-2013) as the successor to the current programme, which is repealed in Article 11.
This is wholly in accordance with the request made earlier by the Parliament to the Commission (resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013, Böge report).
This is wholly in accordance with the request made earlier by the Parliament to the Commission (resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013, Böge report).
Although the current consumer programme has not yet expired, it is appropriate to begin in good time with the legislative programme and have it run for a period coinciding with the (hoped-for) interinstitutional agreement on the financial perspective.
Although the current consumer programme has not yet expired, it is appropriate to begin in good time with the legislative programme and have it run for a period coinciding with the (hoped-for) interinstitutional agreement on the financial perspective.
Article 2 sets out the objectives, which are fleshed out with actions and instruments in the annex.
Article 2 sets out the objectives, which are fleshed out with actions and instruments in the annex.
The key elements of the current programme are retained, but reordered and extended.
The key elements of the current programme are retained, but reordered and extended.
In future, for example, attention will be paid to deepening knowledge of, and extending scientific data on, consumer demand and behaviour and markets.
In future, for example, attention will be paid to deepening knowledge of, and extending scientific data on, consumer demand and behaviour and markets.
The development of reliable indicators and benchmarks for consumer policy is also new.
The development of reliable indicators and benchmarks for consumer policy is also new.
If these are subsequently used as an instrument for evaluating the results of programmes, progress will also be possible in this area.
If these are subsequently used as an instrument for evaluating the results of programmes, progress will also be possible in this area.
In your rapporteur‘s view, the indicators used up to now are, regrettably, too one-sidedly quantitative and too subjective and could therefore well be improved.
In your rapporteur's view, the indicators used up to now are, regrettably, too one-sidedly quantitative and too subjective and could therefore well be improved.
As a consequence of the split, some objectives and actions set out in the list of common objectives and in the annex must be reformulated and moved.
As a consequence of the split, some objectives and actions set out in the list of common objectives and in the annex must be reformulated and moved.
As regards the substance of the concrete actions, more - and explicit - attention needs to be paid to:
As regards the substance of the concrete actions, more - and explicit - attention needs to be paid to:
· the new Member States, where there is often a less long‑standing tradition in the area of consumer protection and consumer involvement in policy, as a result of which awareness of consumer rights and consumer organisations‘ capabilities are still too limited;
- the new Member States, where there is often a less long‑standing tradition in the area of consumer protection and consumer involvement in policy, as a result of which awareness of consumer rights and consumer organisations' capabilities are still too limited;
· the ageing of the population, bearing in mind that some older people are among those consumers less able to defend their interests;
- the ageing of the population, bearing in mind that some older people are among those consumers less able to defend their interests;
· making vulnerable consumers, for whom it is not always possible to guarantee adequate, legally secure protection under the law, and to whom additional attention should therefore be paid in action programmes, more able to defend their interests.
- making vulnerable consumers, for whom it is not always possible to guarantee adequate, legally secure protection under the law, and to whom additional attention should therefore be paid in action programmes, more able to defend their interests.
Article 3 lays down the methods of implementation and the maximum amount of the Community‘s contribution to actions and expenditure for the functioning of certain organisations.
Article 3 lays down the methods of implementation and the maximum amount of the Community's contribution to actions and expenditure for the functioning of certain organisations.
It is noticeable that the ceilings for the Community‘s financial contribution have been considerably increased and the criteria for allocation, as well as the conditions for exceptionally applying higher ceilings, are much less clear than in the current programme.
It is noticeable that the ceilings for the Community's financial contribution have been considerably increased and the criteria for allocation, as well as the conditions for exceptionally applying higher ceilings, are much less clear than in the current programme.
Little justification for this is to be found in the impact study.
Little justification for this is to be found in the impact study.
It is therefore better - unless adequate additional arguments are given by the Commission - to keep the normal maximum at 50% and to agree to the exceptional maxima at the increased level provided that systematic, explicit justification is given for the ‚exceptional utility‘ which is the reason for applying the higher ceiling.
It is therefore better - unless adequate additional arguments are given by the Commission - to keep the normal maximum at 50% and to agree to the exceptional maxima at the increased level provided that systematic, explicit justification is given for the 'exceptional utility' which is the reason for applying the higher ceiling.
Articles 4, 6 and 7 entrust implementation to the Commission, which is to be assisted by a committee (under the commitology procedure).
Articles 4, 6 and 7 entrust implementation to the Commission, which is to be assisted by a committee (under the commitology procedure).
Article 5 lays down, subject to later approval by the budgetary authority, the total budget for the whole period of the programme.
Article 5 lays down, subject to later approval by the budgetary authority, the total budget for the whole period of the programme.
In view of the splitting of the proposed programme into two separate programmes, this budget should be adjusted.
In view of the splitting of the proposed programme into two separate programmes, this budget should be adjusted.
For this purpose, your rapporteur has applied the distribution formula used by the Commission itself, giving a total sum of EUR 233.46 million.
For this purpose, your rapporteur has applied the distribution formula used by the Commission itself, giving a total sum of EUR 233.46 million.
This sum represents a considerable increase in the financial resources allocated to the consumer programme.
This sum represents a considerable increase in the financial resources allocated to the consumer programme.
This is justified in the light of - inter alia - the impact of the previous enlargement of the European Union and the future enlargement to include countries with a less deep-rooted tradition of consumer protection.
This is justified in the light of - inter alia - the impact of the previous enlargement of the European Union and the future enlargement to include countries with a less deep-rooted tradition of consumer protection.
It is also in accordance with the aforementioned Parliament resolution of 8 June 2005.
It is also in accordance with the aforementioned Parliament resolution of 8 June 2005.
Articles 8 and 9 deal with international aspects.
Articles 8 and 9 deal with international aspects.
Unlike under the previous programme, provision is rightly made for possible participation by countries covered by neighbourhood agreements, countries involved in accession procedures or applying for membership and certain western Balkan countries.
Unlike under the previous programme, provision is rightly made for possible participation by countries covered by neighbourhood agreements, countries involved in accession procedures or applying for membership and certain western Balkan countries.
Article 10 relates to monitoring, (interim) evaluation and dissemination of results.
Article 10 relates to monitoring, (interim) evaluation and dissemination of results.
Article 12 charges the Commission with taking any necessary transitional measures.
Article 12 charges the Commission with taking any necessary transitional measures.
Executive agency
Executive agency
In the articles of the proposal there is no reference to possible delegation of implementing powers in respect of the programme to an ‚executive agency‘.
In the articles of the proposal there is no reference to possible delegation of implementing powers in respect of the programme to an 'executive agency'.
However, mention is made of this in recital 14 and in the Communication from the Commission which is contained together with the proposal in the same Commission document.
However, mention is made of this in recital 14 and in the Communication from the Commission which is contained together with the proposal in the same Commission document.
In your rapporteur‘s view, there would be benefits to a decision by the Commission to delegate powers.
In your rapporteur's view, there would be benefits to a decision by the Commission to delegate powers.
The Commission would have more room to pursue its policy tasks and would be able to put more of its efforts into adapting the ‚acquis‘ more quickly, taking account of the objectives of ‚better regulation‘.
The Commission would have more room to pursue its policy tasks and would be able to put more of its efforts into adapting the 'acquis' more quickly, taking account of the objectives of 'better regulation'.
If the Commission plans to take a decision to delegate powers, your rapporteur recommends that a cost-effectiveness analysis is first carried out, that delegated powers are restricted to logistical and administrative tasks and that they are entrusted to the executive agency set up for the public health programme, the name of which should if necessary be changed.
If the Commission plans to take a decision to delegate powers, your rapporteur recommends that a cost-effectiveness analysis is first carried out, that delegated powers are restricted to logistical and administrative tasks and that they are entrusted to the executive agency set up for the public health programme, the name of which should if necessary be changed.
The consumer protection section of the agency should preferably not be called an ‚institute‘.
The consumer protection section of the agency should preferably not be called an 'institute'.
This would be very misleading in relation to its powers.
This would be very misleading in relation to its powers.
Finally, your rapporteur wishes to complain about the inadequate attention, or the complete lack of attention, paid to the translation of Commission documents in this dossier.
Finally, your rapporteur wishes to complain about the inadequate attention, or the complete lack of attention, paid to the translation of Commission documents in this dossier.
The extended impact study is available only in a panaché language version (alternately French and English, even within a single chapter).
The extended impact study is available only in a panaché language version (alternately French and English, even within a single chapter).
And, moreover, even the two annexes that form part of the communication (which has itself been translated) setting out the strategy and contained in the same COM document, are - in all of the language versions of the document - regrettably only available in English.
And, moreover, even the two annexes that form part of the communication (which has itself been translated) setting out the strategy and contained in the same COM document, are - in all of the language versions of the document - regrettably only available in English.
k návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se zavádí akční program Společenství v oblasti zdraví a ochrany spotřebitele (2007–2013) – spotřebitelská hlediska
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council decision establishing a Programme of Community action in the field of Health and Consumer protection (2007-2013) - Consumer aspects
Cette communication vise à établir un programme commun de santé publique et de protection des consommateurs.
This communication aims to set up a joint health and consumer protection programme.
Le volet santé publique relève de la compétence de la commission environnement et sera traité séparément.
The public health aspect falls within the remit of the environment committee and will be dealt with separately.
Le présent document vise à présenter un avis à l'intention de la Commission du marché intérieur et de la protection des consommateurs , compétente au fond, pour le volet protection des consommateurs.
The purpose of the present document is to deliver an opinion on the consumer protection aspect for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the committee responsible.
L'objectif de ce programme est d'harmoniser la protection des consommateurs sur l'ensemble du marché intérieur de telle sorte que les citoyens puissent se déplacer et acheter des biens avec la même confiance que s'ils se trouvaient dans leur pays d'origine.
The aim of this programme is to harmonise consumer protection throughout the single market, so that citizens can move around the Union and buy goods with the same confidence as in their countries of origin.
Le programme s'organisera autour des objectifs communs à la santé et à la protection des consommateurs et des objectifs spécifiques à chacun des deux volets.
The programme will be organised around objectives that are common to health and consumer protection and around objectives that are specific to each of them.
Les objectifs communs aux volets santé et protection des consommateurs sont
The common objectives of the health and consumer protection aspects are:
COM(2005)0115 , page 3, point 2.1. :
COM(2005)0115 , page 3, point 2.1.
• Accroître la capacité des citoyens de prendre de meilleures décisions concernant leur santé et leurs intérêts en tant que consommateurs.
· To increase the ability of citizens to take better decisions about their health and consumer interests.