natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nevertheless, in a spirit of cooperation with the European institutions, he would ask the public prosecutor's office in Lyon to inform the court of Parliament's difficulties with the timing of hearing and to ask it to apply for an adjournment of the case at the hearing on 6 September.
Nevertheless, in a spirit of cooperation with the European institutions, he would ask the public prosecutor's office in Lyon to inform the court of Parliament's difficulties with the timing of hearing and to ask it to apply for an adjournment of the case at the hearing on 6 September.
The judge adjourned the hearing of 6 September to 29 November 2005.
The judge adjourned the hearing of 6 September to 29 November 2005.
In this context, Article 26
In this context, Article 26
Article amended by Constitutional Law No 95-880 of 4 August 1995. of the French Constitution provides as follows:
Article amended by Constitutional Law No 95-880 of 4 August 1995. of the French Constitution provides as follows:
"No Member of Parliament shall be subject to legal proceedings, investigations, arrest, detention or judgment for opinions expressed or votes cast by him while carrying out his duties.
"No Member of Parliament shall be subject to legal proceedings, investigations, arrest, detention or judgment for opinions expressed or votes cast by him while carrying out his duties.
No Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving the Member of freedom or restricting that freedom for criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he belongs, except in the case of a crime or flagrante delicto or of final sentence.
No Member of Parliament may be arrested or subject to any other measure depriving the Member of freedom or restricting that freedom for criminal or minor offences without the authorisation of the Assembly to which he belongs, except in the case of a crime or flagrante delicto or of final sentence.
Detention, measures depriving the Member of his freedom or restricting that freedom or the prosecution of the Member of Parliament shall be suspended during the session if the Assembly of which he is a Member so demands.
Detention, measures depriving the Member of his freedom or restricting that freedom or the prosecution of the Member of Parliament shall be suspended during the session if the Assembly of which he is a Member so demands.
The Assembly concerned shall meet automatically for additional sittings to enable, where appropriate, the provisions of the preceding paragraph to be applied."
The Assembly concerned shall meet automatically for additional sittings to enable, where appropriate, the provisions of the preceding paragraph to be applied."
OJ C 99, 13.4.1987, p.44 .
OJ C 99, 13.4.1987, p.44 .
(a) Parliamentary immunity is not a privilege granted for the benefit of an individual member of Parliament, but a guarantee of Parliament's independence and that of its members vis-à-vis other institutions.
(a) Parliamentary immunity is not a privilege granted for the benefit of an individual member of Parliament, but a guarantee of Parliament's independence and that of its members vis-à-vis other institutions.
(b) The fact that Article 10, first paragraph, subparagraph (a), of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities refers to the immunities granted to members of national parliaments does not mean that the European Parliament has no power to create its own rules in the matter of the waiver of parliamentary immunity.
(b) The fact that Article 10, first paragraph, subparagraph (a), of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities refers to the immunities granted to members of national parliaments does not mean that the European Parliament has no power to create its own rules in the matter of the waiver of parliamentary immunity.
Parliament's decisions have gradually forged a coherent notion of European parliamentary immunity which is, in principle, independent of the various practices of the national parliaments.
Parliament's decisions have gradually forged a coherent notion of European parliamentary immunity which is, in principle, independent of the various practices of the national parliaments.
This avoids differences in treatment between Members resulting from their nationality.
This avoids differences in treatment between Members resulting from their nationality.
Consequently, whereas immunity existing under national law is considered, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles in deciding whether to waive the immunity of a Member or not.
Consequently, whereas immunity existing under national law is considered, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles in deciding whether to waive the immunity of a Member or not.
Parliamentary immunity exists to protect Members' freedom of expression and freedom of political debate.
Parliamentary immunity exists to protect Members' freedom of expression and freedom of political debate.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has discussed in detail the articles of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities which may apply.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has discussed in detail the articles of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities which may apply.
The Committee decided that the present case has to be examined under Article 9 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in connection with the above mentioned principles.
The Committee decided that the present case has to be examined under Article 9 of the Protocol on the privileges and immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in connection with the above mentioned principles.
Article 9 states that 'Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties'.
Article 9 states that 'Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties'.
That absolute immunity only applies to 'opinions expressed or votes cast by [Members] in the performance of their duties'.
That absolute immunity only applies to 'opinions expressed or votes cast by [Members] in the performance of their duties'.
(a) Applying these principles the committee notes that, when Mr Gollnich expressed his opinion during the press conference of 11 October 2004, he was not exercising his freedom of speech in connection with "the performance of his duties" as a Member of the European Parliament.
(a) Applying these principles the committee notes that, when Mr Gollnich expressed his opinion during the press conference of 11 October 2004, he was not exercising his freedom of speech in connection with "the performance of his duties" as a Member of the European Parliament.
According to the explanations given by Mr Gollnisch, he expressed his opinion about the massacre of Katyn in response to questions from journalists about his highly critical remarks relating to political interference in the Rousso report on the political views of Lyon III University academics.
According to the explanations given by Mr Gollnisch, he expressed his opinion about the massacre of Katyn in response to questions from journalists about his highly critical remarks relating to political interference in the Rousso report on the political views of Lyon III University academics.
The statements were directly related with the professional activities of Mr Gollnisch as professor at the Lyon III University and had nothing to do with his duties as a Member of the European Parliament.
The statements were directly related with the professional activities of Mr Gollnisch as professor at the Lyon III University and had nothing to do with his duties as a Member of the European Parliament.
It cannot therefore be maintained that he was acting 'in the performance of his duties' as a Member of the European Parliament.
It cannot therefore be maintained that he was acting 'in the performance of his duties' as a Member of the European Parliament.
(b) Rule 7(6) of the Rules of Procedure is satisfied.
(b) Rule 7(6) of the Rules of Procedure is satisfied.
According to the information given by the French Ministry of Justice, the criminal inquiry carried out against Mr Gollnisch does not hinder him in the performance of his duties, for example by preventing him from participating in Parliament's sessions, committee meetings, etc.
According to the information given by the French Ministry of Justice, the criminal inquiry carried out against Mr Gollnisch does not hinder him in the performance of his duties, for example by preventing him from participating in Parliament's sessions, committee meetings, etc.
It appears from this information that Mr Gollnisch is not obliged to be present at the hearing and can be represented by his counsel.
It appears from this information that Mr Gollnisch is not obliged to be present at the hearing and can be represented by his counsel.
Furthermore, the hearing can be postponed if Mr Gollnisch so requests.
Furthermore, the hearing can be postponed if Mr Gollnisch so requests.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the request for the defence of Mr Gollnisch's immunity be rejected.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the request for the defence of Mr Gollnisch's immunity be rejected.
Žádost o ochranu imunity a výsad Bruna Gollnische
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Bruno Gollnisch
Luca Romagnoli 7.4.2005 14.4.2005
Luca Romagnoli 7.4.2005 14.4.2005
Diana Wallis 21.4.2005
Diana Wallis 21.4.2005
13 3 1
13 3 1
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Maria Berger, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Tadeusz Zwiefka
ke společnému postoji Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 1999/62/ES o výběru poplatků za užívání určitých pozemních komunikací těžkými nákladními vozidly (změna směrnice 1999/62/ES)
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
PE 360.277v03-00
PE 360.277v03-00
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................21
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
o společném postoji Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 1999/62/ES o výběru poplatků za užívání určitých pozemních komunikací těžkými nákladními vozidly (změna směrnice 1999/62/ES)
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (9856/2005 – C6‑0274/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (9856/2005 – C6‑0274/2005 ),
C 104, 30.4.2004, s. k návrhu Komise předloženému Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2003)0448 )
OJ C 104, 30.4.2004, p. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0448 )
251 odst.
Not yet available.
– s ohledem na doporučení pro druhé čtení dané Výborem pro dopravu a cestovní ruch ( A6‑0377/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0377/2005 ),
Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 1999/62/ES o výběru poplatků za užívání určitých pozemních komunikací těžkými nákladními vozidly
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
Směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice 1999/62/ES o výběru poplatků za užívání určitých pozemních komunikací nákladními vozidly
Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures
Since the directive also includes goods vehicles upwards of 3.5 tonnes, no distinction should be made between light and heavy goods vehicles.
Since the directive also includes goods vehicles upwards of 3.5 tonnes, no distinction should be made between light and heavy goods vehicles .
(2) Spravedlivější systém vybírání poplatků za užívání pozemních komunikací je nesmírně důležitý pro podporu udržitelné dopravy ve Společenství.
(2) A fairer system of charging for the use of road infrastructure is crucial in order to encourage sustainable transport in the Community.
Cíle optimálního využívání stávající silniční sítě a dosažení podstatného snížení negativního dopadu tohoto využívání by mělo být dosaženo bez ukládání dalšího zatížení na hospodářské subjekty, v zájmu zdravého hospodářského růstu a řádného fungování vnitřního trhu.
The objective of making optimum use of the existing road network and achieving a significant reduction in its negative impact should be achieved without imposing additional burdens on operators in the interests of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the single market.
(2) Spravedlivější systém vybírání poplatků za užívání pozemních komunikací, založený na zásadách „uživatel platí“a „znečišťovatel platí“ je nesmírně důležitý pro podporu udržitelné dopravy ve Společenství.
(2) A fairer system of charging for the use of road infrastructure , based on the ‘user pays’ and the ‘polluter pays’ principles, is crucial in order to encourage sustainable transport in the Community.
Cíle optimálního využívání stávající silniční sítě a dosažení podstatného snížení negativního dopadu tohoto využívání by mělo být dosaženo tak, aby nedocházelo ke dvojímu zdanění, a bez ukládání dalšího zatížení na hospodářské subjekty, v zájmu zdravého hospodářského růstu a řádného fungování vnitřního trhu , včetně odlehlých regionů .
The objective of making optimum use of the existing road network and achieving a significant reduction in its negative impact should be achieved in such a way as to avoid double taxation, and without imposing additional burdens on operators in the interests of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the single market , including outlying regions .
Re-introducing approach EP from first reading.
Re-introducing approach EP from first reading.
BOD ODŮVODNĚNÍ 3A (NOVÝ)
RECITAL 3 A (new)
(3a) Evropská rada v bodě 29 závěrů ze svého zasedání konaného ve dnech 15. a 16. června 2001 v Göteborgu uvádí, že udržitelná dopravní politika by měla řešit rostoucí objem dopravy a míru dopravních zácep, hluku a znečištění, a podporovat způsoby dopravy šetrné k životnímu prostředí i plnou internalizaci sociálních a environmentálních nákladů.
(3a) In paragraph 29 of the conclusions of its meeting of 15 and 16 June 2001 in Göteborg , the European Council stated that a sustainable transport policy should tackle rising volumes of traffic and levels of congestion, noise and pollution and encourage the use of environment-friendly modes of transport as well as the full internalisation of social and environmental costs.
Re-introducing amendment from EP first reading.
Re-introducing amendment from EP first reading.
(5) Činnosti v oblasti mezinárodní silniční dopravy se soustřeďují na transevropskou silniční dopravní síť.
(5) International road transport operations are concentrated on the trans-European road transport network.
Pro komerční dopravu má navíc klíčový význam řádné fungování vnitřního trhu.
Furthermore, the operation of the internal market is vital to commercial transport.
Pro komerční dopravu v rámci transevropské dopravní sítě vymezené v rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady č. 1692/96/ES ze dne 23. července 1996 o hlavních směrech pro rozvoj transevropské dopravní sítě by tedy měl platit rámec Společenství.
Consequently, the Community framework must apply to commercial transport on the trans-European road network as defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network.
Podle zásady subsidiarity a v souladu se Smlouvou by členské státy měly mít možnost neomezeně uplatnit mýtné nebo poplatky za užívání na silnicích jiných, než silnicích v rámci transevropské silniční sítě .
Member States must, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity , be free to apply tolls and/or user charges on roads other than those on the trans-European road network, in compliance with the rules of the Treaty.
Pro komerční dopravu v rámci transevropské dopravní sítě vymezené v rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady č. 1692/96/ES ze dne 23. července 1996 o hlavních směrech pro rozvoj transevropské dopravní sítě by tedy měl platit rámec Společenství.
Consequently, the Community framework must apply to commercial transport on the trans-European road network as defined in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network .
Aby se zamezilo odklonu dopravy a s tím spojeným vážným důsledkům pro silniční bezpečnost a pro optimální využití dopravních sítí, musí mít členské státy možnost zavést zpoplatnění každé silnice, která přímo konkuruje transevropské síti (hlavní silniční síti).
In order to avoid traffic being diverted, with potentially serious consequences for road safety and the optimum use of the transport network, Member States must be able to introduce charging on any road which is in direct competition with the trans-European network (main road network).
Členské státy podle zásady subsidiarity a regionální a místní orgány v souladu se svými příslušnými pravomocemi mohou v souladu s ustanoveními Smlouvy neomezeně uplatňovat mýtné nebo poplatky za užívání na silnicích jiných, než silnicích v rámci hlavní silniční sítě.
In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity , Member States and, in accordance with their respective powers, regional and local authorities are free to apply tolls and/or user charges on roads other than those on the main road network, in compliance with the rules of the Treaty.
Vedle ustanovení této směrnice mohou členské státy nebo příslušné orgány v souladu s článkem 9 směrnice 1999/62/ES uplatňovat další poplatky z provozu ve městech a regulační poplatky na jakýchkoli silnicích, zejména v městských oblastech včetně silnic v rámci transevropské dopravní sítě, které křižují městskou oblast.
In addition to the provisions of this directive Member States or the relevant competent authorities may apply additional urban traffic charges and regulatory charges on any road notably in urban areas including TEN roads crossing an urban area, according to article 9 of Directive 1999/62/EC.
(6) Z důvodů nákladové efektivnosti není při zavádění systémů mýtného nutné, aby celá pozemní komunikace, na niž se vztahuje mýtné, podléhala omezením přístupu umožňujícím kontrolu vybíraného mýtného.
(6) For reasons of cost efficiency in the implementation of tolling systems, the entire infrastructure to which a toll relates may not necessarily be subject to access restrictions controlling tolls charged.
Členské státy se mohou rozhodnout, že budou tuto směrnici provádět pomocí používání mýtného pouze na určitém místě pozemní komunikace, na niž se mýtné vztahuje.
Member States may choose to implement this Directive through the use of tolls at only a particular point on the infrastructure to which the toll relates.
Nesmí tím být diskriminován provoz, který není místní povahy.
This shall not discriminate against non-local traffic.
Tolling at a particular point must not discriminate against non-local traffic.
Tolling at a particular point must not discriminate against non-local traffic.
(11) Vybírají-li členské státy mýtné nebo poplatky za užívání na silnicích v rámci transevropské silniční sítě, měly by zpoplatněné silnice dostat přiměřenou prioritu v plánech údržby členských států .
(11) Where Member States levy tolls or user charges for use of roads in the trans-European road network, the roads subject to charging should be given appropriate priority in the maintenance schedules of Member States .
(11) Vybírají-li členské státy mýtné nebo poplatky za užívání na silnicích v rámci transevropské silniční sítě, použijí se tyto výnosy k údržbě dotčené infrastruktury a dopravního odvětví jako celku, v zájmu vyváženého a udržitelného rozvoje dopravních sítí.
(11) Where Member States levy tolls or user charges for use of roads in the trans-European road network, this revenue should be used for the maintenance of the infrastructure concerned and the transport sector as a whole, in the interest of a balanced and sustainable development of transport networks.
(12) Horským oblastem, jako jsou Alpy nebo Pyreneje, by měla být věnována zvláštní pozornost.
(12) Particular attention should be devoted to mountain regions such as the Alps or the Pyrenees.
Uskutečnění nových důležitých infrastrukturních projektů často ztroskotalo na nedostatku potřebných značných finančních prostředků.
The launch of major new infrastructure projects has often failed because the substantial financial resources they would require were not available.
V těchto oblastech proto uživatelé možná budou muset platit v mýtném příplatek na financování zásadních projektů velmi vysokého evropského zájmu, které se mohou případně týkat též jiných oborů dopravy ve stejném dopravním koridoru.
In such regions, users may therefore be required to pay a mark-up to finance essential projects of very high European value, including those involving another mode of transport in the same corridor.
Tato částka by se měla řídit finančními prostředky potřebnými pro daný projekt.
This amount should be linked to the financial needs of the project.
Měla by se rovněž řídit podle výchozí hodnoty mýtného, aby se poplatky v určitém dopravním koridoru neudržovaly uměle příliš vysoko, což by mohlo vést k převedení dopravy na jiné dopravní koridory a tím k místnímu dopravnímu přetížení a neefektivnímu využívání dopravních sítí.
It should also be linked to the basic level of the tolls in order to avoid artificially high charges in any one corridor, which could lead to traffic being diverted to other corridors, thereby causing local congestion problems and inefficient use of networks.
(12) Horským oblastem, jako jsou Alpy nebo Pyreneje, by měla být věnována zvláštní pozornost.
(12) Particular attention should be devoted to mountain regions such as the Alps or the Pyrenees .
V těchto oblastech proto uživatelé možná budou muset platit v mýtném příplatek na financování zásadních projektů velmi vysokého evropského zájmu, které se mohou případně týkat též jiných oborů dopravy ve stejném dopravním koridoru.
In such regions, users may therefore be required to pay a mark-up to finance essential projects of very high European value, including those involving another mode of transport in the same corridor or the same transport area.
Článek 9 směrnice 1999/62/ES týkající se dopravních poplatků a regulačních poplatků tím není dotčen.
This leaves unaffected the provisions of article 9 of Directive 1999/62/EC regarding urban traffic charges and regulatory charges.
V případě koncesních smluv by podstatné změny mohly být provedeny v souladu s postupem zadávání veřejných zakázek.
In the case of concession contracts, substantial modification could be implemented pursuant to a public procurement process.