natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Avšak městská doprava, přístavní služby, taxi služba a vozidla rychlé lékařské pomoci jsou vyloučeny, a přeprava hotovosti a přeprava zemřelých osob jsou do působnosti této směrnice zahrnuty, a to s ohledem na problémy vnitřního trhu, které byly v těchto oblastech zjištěny.
However, urban transport, port services, taxis and ambulances are excluded, and cash in transit or the transport of deceased persons are included in the scope of this Directive given that Internal Market problems have been identified in these fields.
(13a) Tato směrnice je v souladu s ostatními současnými iniciativami Společenství souvisejícími s vnitřním trhem, jako je návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o podpoře prodeje na vnitřním trhu, a dalšími iniciativami souvisejícími s ochranou spotřebitele.
(13a) This Directive is consistent with other current Community initiatives concerning the internal market, such as the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on sales promotions in the internal market and those concerning consumer protection.
Technical adaption.
Technical adaption.
(27a) V souladu s judikaturou Soudního dvora cíle veřejného zdraví, ochrany spotřebitele, zdraví zvířat a městského prostředí tvoří důvody vyššího obecného zájmu, které opravňují k používání povolovacích režimů a jiných omezení použitelných pro zdravotní péči nebo sociální zabezpečení, ale žádné takové povolení nesmí být diskriminační pro zemi původu žadatele a musí splňovat kritéria nezbytných požadavků a proporcionality.
(27a) According to the case law of the Court of Justice, public health, consumer protection, animal health and urban environment objectives constitute overriding reasons relating to the public interest which can justify the application of authorisation schemes and other restrictions applicable to health care or social services, but any such authorisation may not discriminate in terms of the applicant's country of origin and must satisfy criteria of necessity and proportionality.
Clarification of essential basis of justification for imposing restrictions by host Member State.
Clarification of essential basis of justification for imposing restrictions by host Member State.
(27b) Povolení by obvykle mělo poskytovateli umožnit přístup k činnosti v oblasti poskytování služeb nebo k výkonu této činnosti na celém území daného státu, s výjimkou případů, kdy je územní omezení opodstatněno důvodem vyššího obecného zájmu.
(27b) The authorisation should normally enable the provider to have access to the service activity, or to exercise that activity, throughout the national territory except if a territorial limit is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Například ochrana městského prostředí opodstatňuje požadavek na samostatné povolení ke každému usazení na území daného státu.
For example, the protection of the urban environment justifies the requirement to obtain an individual authorisation for each installation on the national territory.
Tímto ustanovením nejsou dotčeny regionální nebo místní pravomoci pro udělování povolení v rámci členských států.
This provision does not affect the regional or local competences for the granting of authorisation within the Member States.
(28a) Tato směrnice stanoví, že v případě neposkytnutí odpovědi v určité lhůtě, se povolení považuje za udělené.
(28a) This Directive provides that failing a response within a time period, authorisation shall be deemed to have been granted.
V případech vyššího obecného zájmu, například ve vztahu ke zdravotnickým službám nebo činnostem, které vytvářejí zvláštní rizika pro třetí strany, jako například soukromé bezpečnostní služby, může být vyžadováno jednoznačné povolení.
In cases of overriding reasons relating to public interest, for example in respect of health services or for activities which create particular risks for third parties such as private security services, an explicit authorisation may be required.
Necessary explanation of cases, where no automatic authorisation is admissible.
Necessary explanation of cases, where no automatic authorisation is admissible.
(35) Je vhodné, aby se ustanovení této směrnice týkající se svobody usazování používala jen v rozsahu, kdy jsou zmíněné činnosti otevřeny hospodářské soutěži, takže členské státy nemají povinnost zrušit stávající monopoly, zejména činnosti v oblasti loterií, nebo privatizovat určité oblasti.
(35) It is appropriate that the provisions of this Directive concerning freedom of establishment should apply only to the extent that the activities in question are open to competition, so that they do not oblige Member States to abolish existing monopolies, notably those of lotteries, or to privatise certain sectors.
Modified through Amendment on Recital 7 a (new).
Modified through Amendment on Recital 7 a (new).
Tato směrnice se nezabývá ani liberalizací služeb obecného hospodářského zájmu ani privatizací veřejných subjektů poskytujících takové služby.
This Directive does not cover either the liberalisation of services of general economic interest or the privatisation of public bodies providing such services.
Pravidla společenství o hospodářské soutěži a pomoci zůstanou tedy nedotčena.
Community rules on competition and aid also remain unaffected.
The Directive does not affect the right of the Member States, under Community law, to define and organise services of general economic interest.
The Directive does not affect the right of the Member States, under Community law, to define and organise services of general economic interest.
Tato směrnice se nevztahuje na následující činnosti:
This Directive shall not apply to the following activities:
Tato směrnice se nevztahuje na následující činnosti, pokud jsou tyto činnosti zvlášť upraveny jinými akty Společenství:
This Directive shall not apply to the following activities in so far as these activities are regulated specifically in other Community acts:
The scope of the directive, laid down in Article 2, should be more clearly defined and a number of exemptions could be added: Sectors that are regulated by a specific policy and other Community legislation should not be covered by the scope.
The scope of the directive, laid down in Article 2, should be more clearly defined and a number of exemptions could be added: Sectors that are regulated by a specific policy and other Community legislation should not be covered by the scope.
This means that services regulated e.g. by the Telecommunication package, the Television Without Frontiers Directive, the financial services directives, including the Distance Marketing of Financial Services Directive and pension funds, and the transport directives and regulations are not covered by the scope of the directive.
This means that services regulated e.g. by the Telecommunication package, the Television Without Frontiers Directive, the financial services directives, including the Distance Marketing of Financial Services Directive and pension funds, and the transport directives and regulations are not covered by the scope of the directive.
The provisions of the directive do not even apply when those directives include derogations for Member states, e.g. for maintaining cultural diversity or for pension funds.
The provisions of the directive do not even apply when those directives include derogations for Member states, e.g. for maintaining cultural diversity or for pension funds.
a) jakékoliv služby bankovní, úvěrové nebo pojišťovací povahy, včetně zajišťovnictví, osobních důchodů, investic, plateb, investičního poradenství a obecně služeb uvedených v příloze 1 směrnice 2000/12/ES vztahující se k nástupnickým a pokračujícím obchodům úvěrových institucí.
(a) any service of a banking, credit or insurance nature, including reinsurance, personal pensions, investments, payments, investment advice and, in general, the services listed in Annex I to Directive 2000/12/EC relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions.
La rédaction de l’article 2 concernant le champ d’application de la directive ne nous paraît pas satisfaisante.
The wording of Article 2 as regards the scope of the Directive is unsatisfactory.
Elle reprend la définition des « services financiers » issue de la directive 2002/65/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 23 septembre 2002 relative à la commercialisation à distance de services financiers auprès des consommateurs.
It takes the definition of financial services from Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services.
Cette définition n’englobe pas l’ensemble des activités bancaires et financières, comme par exemple l’affacturage ou le crédit-bail.
This definition does not cover all banking and financial activities, such as factoring or leasing.
Pour couvrir ces activités, il convient de faire également référence à la directive 2000/12/CE concernant l'accès à l'activité des établissements de crédit et son exercice.
In order to also include such activities, reference should also be made to Directive 2000/12/EC relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions.
ca) vysílací činnosti, jak jsou vymezeny směrnicí 89/552/EHS, a rozhlasové programy, jak jsou vymezeny směrnicí 98/84/ES, a také audiovizuální služby vztahující se přímo k těmto činnostem;
(ca) broadcasting activities as defined in Directive 89/552/EEC and radio programmes as defined in Directive 98/84/EC as well as audiovisual services directly linked to these activities;
Notarial activities which are linked to the exercise of public authority are specifically excluded from the scope of the Directive.
Notarial activities which are linked to the exercise of public authority are specifically excluded from the scope of the Directive.
In 19 of the 25 Member States notaries perform services in the judicial field whereby they participate in the exercise of official authority within the meaning of Article 45 of the EC Treaty.
In 19 of the 25 Member States notaries perform services in the judicial field whereby they participate in the exercise of official authority within the meaning of Article 45 of the EC Treaty.
As is clear in particular from the Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-260/97 of 17 June 1999 (Unibank), in order for an instrument to be regarded as authentic, its “authenticity…should have been established by a public authority”.
As is clear in particular from the Court of Justice’s judgment in Case C-260/97 of 17 June 1999 (Unibank), in order for an instrument to be regarded as authentic, its “authenticity…should have been established by a public authority”.
Notaries of the Roman-law type satisfy this requirement, because they are holders of a public office appointed by the state.
Notaries of the Roman-law type satisfy this requirement, because they are holders of a public office appointed by the state.
Furthermore the approach needs to be consistent with the Directive on the Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications.
Furthermore the approach needs to be consistent with the Directive on the Mutual Recognition of Professional Qualifications.
In the interest of the greatest possible legal certainty, it is therefore necessary to make specific mention of the official status of notarial activities in the Directive and to exclude them from its scope.
In the interest of the greatest possible legal certainty, it is therefore necessary to make specific mention of the official status of notarial activities in the Directive and to exclude them from its scope.
Tato směrnice se nevztahuje na oblast daní, s výjimkou zákazu diskriminace podle článků 14, 16 a 20 .
This Directive shall not apply to the field of taxation, with the exception of the prohibition of discriminations provided for in Articles 14, 16 and 20 .
Použití této směrnice nebrání použití ustanovení jiných nástrojů Společenství s ohledem na služby upravené těmito ustanoveními.
Application of this Directive shall not prevent the application of provisions of other Community instruments as regards the services governed by those provisions.
Pravidla Společenství o činnostech specifických služeb se použijí bez omezení a mohou být jen doplněna, nikoliv nahrazena touto směrnicí.
Community rules on specific service activities shall apply without restriction and shall only be complemented, not replaced, by this Directive.
This amendment makes clear that neither the “TV without Frontiers” Directive nor the Professional Qualifications Directive are called into question by the Services Directive.
This amendment makes clear that neither the “TV without Frontiers” Directive nor the Professional Qualifications Directive are called into question by the Services Directive.
Právní akty Společenství upravující tvorbu svobody usazování nebo svobody poskytovat služby ve specifických oblastech nebo profesích mají přednost před touto směrnicí.
Community legal acts governing the creation of freedom of establishment or freedom to provide services in specific areas or professions shall take precedence over this Directive.
It is absolutely essential that the specific provisions of the sectorial directives should take precedence.
It is absolutely essential that the specific provisions of the sectorial directives should take precedence.
The Services Directive must not undermine existing European legal acts, which would also create legal uncertainty.
The Services Directive must not undermine existing European legal acts, which would also create legal uncertainty.
17 bod 1
Article 17, point 1
(3) služby přenosu , distribuce, dodávek a skladování plynu ve smyslu čl.
(3) gas transmission , distribution, supply and storage services within the meaning of point (5) of Article 2 of Directive 2003/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council;
(4). služby distribuce vody ;
(4) water distribution services;
(4). služby distribuce, dodávek a čištění vody ;
(4) water distribution , supply and treatment services;
Clarifies which areas are exempted from the country of origin principle.
Clarifies which areas are exempted from the country of origin principle.
Členské státy nesmí podmiňovat převzetí nákladů na mimonemocniční péči v jiném členském státě udělením povolení, jestliže by náklady na tuto péči, pokud by byla poskytnuta na jejich vlastním území, byly převzaty jejich systémem sociálního zabezpečení .
Member States may not make assumption of the costs of non-hospital care in another Member State subject to the granting of an authorisation, where the cost of that care, if it had been provided in their territory, would have been assumed by their social security system.
Od pacientů, kterým byla poskytnuta mimonemocniční péče v jiném členském státě, může být požadováno splnění podmínek a formalit, které se vztahují na poskytování mimonemocniční péče na území daného členského státu, například požadavek návštěvy nejprve praktického lékaře před návštěvou specialisty nebo podmínky vztahující se na převzetí nákladů na určité druhy zubního ošetření .
The conditions and formalities to which the receipt of non-hospital care in their territory is made subject by Member States, such as the requirement that a general practitioner be consulted prior to consultation of a specialist, or the terms and conditions relating to the assumption of the costs of certain types of dental care, may be imposed on a patient who has received non-hospital care in another Member State.
Členské státy nesmí podmiňovat převzetí nákladů na zdravotní péči poskytnutou v jiném členském státě, která nevyžaduje hospitalizaci, udělením povolení, jestliže by náklady na tuto péči, pokud by byla poskytnuta na jejich vlastním území, byly převzaty jejich systémem sociálního zabezpečení .
Member States may not make assumption of the costs of health care received in another Member State and which does not require hospitalisation subject to the granting of an authorisation, where the cost of that care, if it had been provided in their territory, would have been assumed by their social security system.
Od pacientů, kterým byla poskytnuta péče v jiném členském státě, může být požadováno splnění podmínek, které se vztahují na poskytování této péče na území daného členského státu .
The conditions to which the receipt of this care in their territory is made subject by Member States, may be imposed on a patient who has received this care in another Member State.
Členské státy zajistí, aby povolení pro uhrazení nákladů na nemocniční péči poskytnutou v jiném členském státě nebylo jejich systémem sociálního zabezpečení zamítnuto, pokud je dotyčná léčba zahrnuta mezi výhody poskytované podle legislativy členského státu, jehož je pacient příslušníkem, a pokud dotyčná léčba nemůže být pacientovi poskytnuta v době přijatelné z medicínského hlediska ve světle aktuálního zdravotního stavu pacienta a pravděpodobného vývoje jeho onemocnění.
Member States shall ensure that authorisation for assumption by their social security system of the cost of hospital care provided in another Member State is not refused. where the treatment in question is among the benefits provided for by the legislation of the Member State of affiliation and where such treatment cannot be given to the patient within a time frame which is medically acceptable in the light of the patient's current state of health and the probable course of the illness.
Členské státy zajistí, aby jejich schvalovací režimy pro převzetí nákladů na zdravotní péči, kromě péče uvedené v odstavci 1, poskytnutou v jiném členském státě splňovaly požadavky stanovené v článcích 9, 10, 11 a 13 .
Member States shall ensure that their authorisation systems for the assumption of the costs of health care, other than that mentioned in paragraph 1, provided in another Member State are in conformity with Articles 9, 10, 11 and 13.
Navrhovatelé Datum jmenování
Draftsman Date appointed
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Pier Luigi Bersani, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Ieke van den Burg, David Casa, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sophia in 't Veld, Benoît Hamon, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Astrid Lulling, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, dManuel António dos Santos, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, Sahra Wagenknecht, Graham Watson, John Whittaker, Lars Wohlin.
Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Pier Luigi Bersani, Sharon Margaret Bowles, Ieke van den Burg, David Casa, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sophia in 't Veld, Benoît Hamon, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Astrid Lulling, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, dManuel António dos Santos, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, Sahra Wagenknecht, Graham Watson, John Whittaker, Lars Wohlin.
Alfonso Andria, Inés Ayala Sender, Bernadette Bourzai, Fiona Hall, Pierre Jonckheer, Karin Jöns, Heinz Kindermann.
Alfonso Andria, Inés Ayala Sender, Bernadette Bourzai, Fiona Hall, Pierre Jonckheer, Karin Jöns, Heinz Kindermann.
Výbor pro vnitřní trh a ochranu spotřebitelů
for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Launched by the Commission in January 2004, the proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market sets out a general legal framework to reduce barriers to cross-border provision of services within the European Union.
Launched by the Commission in January 2004, the proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market sets out a general legal framework to reduce barriers to cross-border provision of services within the European Union.
The draftswoman shares the view that the elimination of obstacles to the provision of services between Member States is an important element in achieving the goal set by the Lisbon European Council of making the European Union the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.
The draftswoman shares the view that the elimination of obstacles to the provision of services between Member States is an important element in achieving the goal set by the Lisbon European Council of making the European Union the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.
However, at the same time, she shares the opinion of many experts and MEPs that many concerns need to be addressed before this Directive can enter into force.
However, at the same time, she shares the opinion of many experts and MEPs that many concerns need to be addressed before this Directive can enter into force.
This draft opinion is based on the findings of the public hearing
This draft opinion is based on the findings of the public hearing
Public Hearing on the Proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market, organized by IMCO and EMPL, 11 November 2004.
Public Hearing on the Proposal for a Directive on Services in the Internal Market, organized by IMCO and EMPL, 11 November 2004.
Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Notice to Members IV/2004 – PE 350.059v02-00. , on the impact study
Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Notice to Members IV/2004 – PE 350.059v02-00. , on the impact study
Towards a European Directive on Services in the Internal Market: Analysing the Legal Repercussions of the Draft Services Directive and its Impact on National Services Regulations, Wouter Gekiere, Institute for European Law, Catholic University Leuven, 24 September 2004. as well as on the contributions from various organisations and expert groups.
Towards a European Directive on Services in the Internal Market: Analysing the Legal Repercussions of the Draft Services Directive and its Impact on National Services Regulations, Wouter Gekiere, Institute for European Law, Catholic University Leuven, 24 September 2004. as well as on the contributions from various organisations and expert groups.
In her working document
In her working document
Working Document on the Draft Services Directive, 11 January 2005, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, Rapporteur Anne Van Lancker, PE 353.364v02-00. , your draftswoman set out the orientations for amendment and identified the following controversial issues: the legal basis and scope of the proposal, the implications of requirements relating to establishment, the introduction of the country of origin principle and the relationship with other Community instruments.
Working Document on the Draft Services Directive, 11 January 2005, Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, Rapporteur Anne Van Lancker, PE 353.364v02-00. , your draftswoman set out the orientations for amendment and identified the following controversial issues: the legal basis and scope of the proposal, the implications of requirements relating to establishment, the introduction of the country of origin principle and the relationship with other Community instruments.
As Commissioner Mc Creevy has made clear in his statement before the European Parliament, the Commission does not have the intention to withdraw its proposal, but confirms its willingness to amend the proposal concerning sensitive issues on the basis of the first reading in European Parliament.
As Commissioner Mc Creevy has made clear in his statement before the European Parliament, the Commission does not have the intention to withdraw its proposal, but confirms its willingness to amend the proposal concerning sensitive issues on the basis of the first reading in European Parliament.
Your draftswoman is of the opinion that at least the following concerns need to be addressed in the report in first reading of the proposal.
Your draftswoman is of the opinion that at least the following concerns need to be addressed in the report in first reading of the proposal.
(1) Scope of the proposal
(1) Scope of the proposal