natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The mutual recognition for these exemptions would mean that many legal uncertainties will be eliminated for both producers and users of these special type of M 3 buses and will probably lead to the setting of common minimum technical standards.
The mutual recognition for these exemptions would mean that many legal uncertainties will be eliminated for both producers and users of these special type of M 3 buses and will probably lead to the setting of common minimum technical standards.
Společný postoj Rady k přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterou se mění směrnice Rady 76/115/EHS o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se kotevních úchytů bezpečnostních pásů motorových vozidel
The Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 76/115/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to anchorages for motor-vehicle safety belts
Paulo Costa 26.1.2005
Paulo Costa 26.1.2005
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Philip Bradbourn, Sylwester Chruszcz, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Armando Dionisi, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Georg Jarzembowski, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Evelin Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Ingo Schmitt, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Gary Titley, Marta Vincenzi, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Den Dover, Willem Schuth
Den Dover, Willem Schuth
o návrhu rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění rozhodnutí Rady 2000/819/ES o víceletém programu pro podnik a podnikavost, a zejména pro malé a střední podniky (MSP) (2001–2005)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (2001-2005)
PE 355.548v02-00
PE 355.548v02-00
– s ohledem na návrh Komise předložený Evropskému parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2004)0781 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0781 )
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ( A6-0118/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0118/2005 ),
Rozpočet na původní víceletý program byl 450 milionů eur na pět let, tj. 90 milionů eur ročně.
The budget for the original multiannual programme was EUR 450 million over five years, i.e. EUR 90 million per year.
Rozpočet na rok 2004 (první rozpočtový rok, který byl upraven na základě rozšíření) byl 91 milionů eur.
The budget for 2004 (the first financial year adjusted for enlargement) was EUR 91 million.
Vzhledem k tomu, že se jedná o mimořádně důležitý a hladce probíhající program v klíčové oblasti politiky, měl by být roční rozpočet na rozšíření programu roven alespoň položce na rok 2004.
Given that this is an extremely important and smoothly operating programme in a key area of policy, the annual budget for the extension of the programme should be at least the equivalent of the appropriation for 2004.
The Commission's proposal and justification for increasing the budget
The Commission's proposal and justification for increasing the budget
The background to the proposal to extend the multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), by one year to 31 December 2006 is that the functions of the programme will in future be performed by its successor programme, the 'Framework Programme for Competitiveness and Innovation' (CIP), which is planned to run from 2007-2013 to coincide with the financial perspective.
The background to the proposal to extend the multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), by one year to 31 December 2006 is that the functions of the programme will in future be performed by its successor programme, the 'Framework Programme for Competitiveness and Innovation' (CIP), which is planned to run from 2007-2013 to coincide with the financial perspective.
The time-frame will therefore also coincide with the 7th Research Framework Programme, which creates scope for better coordination between the programmes.
The time-frame will therefore also coincide with the 7th Research Framework Programme, which creates scope for better coordination between the programmes.
To bridge the gap between the existing and the new framework programme, the Commission proposes extending the existing framework programme by one year and raising the total budget by € 81.5 million, equalling the planned expenditure for 2006.
To bridge the gap between the existing and the new framework programme, the Commission proposes extending the existing framework programme by one year and raising the total budget by € 81.5 million, equalling the planned expenditure for 2006.
Your rapporteur believes that this extension of the existing multiannual programme is necessary and should be supported.
Your rapporteur believes that this extension of the existing multiannual programme is necessary and should be supported.
Your rapporteur finds, however, that the proposed budget is inadequate.
Your rapporteur finds, however, that the proposed budget is inadequate.
It should be remembered that the multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship is the key element in the Community's policy to promote entrepreneurship and support innovation in European SMEs.
It should be remembered that the multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship is the key element in the Community's policy to promote entrepreneurship and support innovation in European SMEs.
Moreover, the original five-year appropriation was for € 450 million, i.e. € 90 million per year, and the budgeted amount for 2004 was € 91 million.
Moreover, the original five-year appropriation was for € 450 million, i.e. € 90 million per year, and the budgeted amount for 2004 was € 91 million.
As the programme shows no sign of a low take-up rate of appropriations - on the contrary, the take-up rate is increasing despite it being a 'front-loaded' programme - the Commission's proposed budget for the extended programme would seem unnecessarily conservative.
As the programme shows no sign of a low take-up rate of appropriations - on the contrary, the take-up rate is increasing despite it being a 'front-loaded' programme - the Commission's proposed budget for the extended programme would seem unnecessarily conservative.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the budget be increased to € 91 million, which is equal to the budgeted amount for 2004.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the budget be increased to € 91 million, which is equal to the budgeted amount for 2004.
Several factors justify an increase in the budget.
Several factors justify an increase in the budget.
Firstly, it is a multiannual programme which both users and external evaluation experts regard as smoothly operating and achieving its objectives.
Firstly, it is a multiannual programme which both users and external evaluation experts regard as smoothly operating and achieving its objectives.
Secondly, it is important to maintain and extend aid to entrepreneurs and SMEs in Europe because they are the backbone of Europe's economy and their continued growth is a condition of achieving the Lisbon objectives.
Secondly, it is important to maintain and extend aid to entrepreneurs and SMEs in Europe because they are the backbone of Europe's economy and their continued growth is a condition of achieving the Lisbon objectives.
In general, therefore, the budget for such aid should be increased.
In general, therefore, the budget for such aid should be increased.
Finally, the external evaluation report carried out by INFYDE Consultants ( SEC(2004)1460 ) stresses that the financial instruments in the existing programme in large measure cover the needs of the new Member States.
Finally, the external evaluation report carried out by INFYDE Consultants ( SEC(2004)1460 ) stresses that the financial instruments in the existing programme in large measure cover the needs of the new Member States.
Restricting funds will therefore impede the integration of those countries into the European economy.
Restricting funds will therefore impede the integration of those countries into the European economy.
Transition to CIP
Transition to CIP
The experience gained during implementation of the existing programme must be used in preparations for the new CIP programme.
The experience gained during implementation of the existing programme must be used in preparations for the new CIP programme.
The above-mentioned evaluation report emphasises that there must be better coordination between the new programme and the Community's Structural Funds and the 7th Research Framework Programme in order to achieve the necessary synergies.
The above-mentioned evaluation report emphasises that there must be better coordination between the new programme and the Community's Structural Funds and the 7th Research Framework Programme in order to achieve the necessary synergies.
This presupposes a greater degree of coordinated thinking on regional development, research and the development of businesses, which establishing partnerships between local and regional players can help achieve.
This presupposes a greater degree of coordinated thinking on regional development, research and the development of businesses, which establishing partnerships between local and regional players can help achieve.
Awareness of the existing multiannual programme has been lacking.
Awareness of the existing multiannual programme has been lacking.
As regards the new programme, several initiatives should be taken to raise awareness of the various instruments under the programme, particularly in the new Member States.
As regards the new programme, several initiatives should be taken to raise awareness of the various instruments under the programme, particularly in the new Member States.
At the same time, your rapporteur would point out that the current programme has still not brought about a sufficient strengthening of the internal market. greater emphasis on cross-border business activity in the new programme.
At the same time, your rapporteur would point out that the current programme has still not brought about a sufficient strengthening of the internal market. greater emphasis on cross-border business activity in the new programme.
Such activity can be achieved, for example, by promoting contacts between capital providers involved in the programme in various Member States.
Such activity can be achieved, for example, by promoting contacts between capital providers involved in the programme in various Member States.
According to the Commission's action plan ( COM(2004)0070 ), the EU is not exploiting its entrepreneurial potential.
According to the Commission's action plan ( COM(2004)0070 ), the EU is not exploiting its entrepreneurial potential.
The new programme must therefore place greater emphasis on the promotion of entrepreneurship.
The new programme must therefore place greater emphasis on the promotion of entrepreneurship.
In that connection, it is important to create better conditions so that particular groups such as women, ethnic minorities and immigrants are helped to start and run their own businesses.
In that connection, it is important to create better conditions so that particular groups such as women, ethnic minorities and immigrants are helped to start and run their own businesses.
One way of achieving this is to facilitate access to micro-loans.
One way of achieving this is to facilitate access to micro-loans.
At the same time, the new programme should address both entrepreneurship and established businesses within the social economy.
At the same time, the new programme should address both entrepreneurship and established businesses within the social economy.
návrh rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady, kterým se mění rozhodnutí Rady 2000/819/ES o víceletém programu pro podnik a podnikavost, a zejména pro malé a střední podniky
Proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2000/819/EC on a multiannual programme for enterprise and entrepreneurship, and in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises
Příslušný výbor Datum oznámení v plénu
Committee responsible Date announced in plenary
ITRE 14.12.2004
ITRE 14.12.2004
Výbor požádaný o stanovisko Datum oznámení v plénu
Committee(s) asked for opinion(s) Date announced in plenary
BUDG 14.12.2004
BUDG 14.12.2004
Nezaujaté stanovisko Datum rozhodnuti
Not delivering opinion(s) Date of decision
BUDG 21.4.2005
BUDG 21.4.2005
Britta Thomsen 27.1.2005
Britta Thomsen 27.1.2005
Změna finační dotace
Financial endowment amended
Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Giles Chichester, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
Ivo Belet, Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Giles Chichester, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Rebecca Harms, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Reino Paasilinna, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca
Datum předložení – A [ 5]
Date tabled – A5
ke společnému postoji Rady k přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o uznávání odborných kvalifikací
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications
PE 355.450v02-00
PE 355.450v02-00
Vysvětlivky pro označení legislativních postupů
Symbols for procedures
Zvýraznění normální kurzívou označuje příslušným oddělením ty části legislativního textu, u nichž je navržena oprava, a má sloužit k vypracování konečného znění (např. zjevné chyby nebo vynechání textu v některé jazykové verzi).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
ke společnému postoji Rady k přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o uznávání odborné kvalifikace
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications
– s ohledem na společný postoj Rady (13781/2/2004 – C6‑0008/2005 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13781/2/2004 – C6‑0008/2005 ),
– s ohledem na svůj postoj při prvním čtení
– having regard to its position at first reading
C 97 E, 22.4.2004, s. 231. návrhu Komise předloženého Parlamentu a Radě ( KOM(2002)0119 )
230. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0119 )
C ... / dosud nezveřejněný v Úředním věstníku. ,
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na doporučení Výboru pro mezinárodní trh a ochranu spotřebitelů pro druhé čtení ( A6‑0119/2005 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0119/2005 ),
Bod odůvodnění 1 a (nový)
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) „Svobodné povolání“ znamená: povolání vykonávané osobou, která na základě zvláštních odborných kvalifikací osobně, na vlastní odpovědnost a odborně nezávisle poskytuje duševně ideové výkony v zájmu zadavatele a ve veřejném zájmu.
(1a) "Liberal profession"signifies a profession practised by a person who, on the basis of specific professional qualifications, provides intellectual services personally, on his own responsibility and exercising technical independence, in the interest of the client and in the general interest.
Výkon povolání obvykle podléhá specifickým profesně právním vazbám v souladu s vnitrostátními právními předpisy a s právními předpisy stanovenými autonomně v tomto rámci příslušným profesním zastoupením, které zaručuji a dále rozvíjí profesionalitu, kvalitu a vztah důvěry se zadavatelem.
The practice of the profession is usually subject to specific professional constraints based on national legislation and on the statutory provisions laid down autonomously, within that framework, by the respective professional representative bodies; those provisions safeguard and develop professionalism, quality and the relationship of trust that exists with the client.
The main features of this definition were confirmed by the European Court of Justice in its judgment in Case 267/99 of 11 October 2001.
The main features of this definition were confirmed by the European Court of Justice in its judgment in Case 267/99 of 11 October 2001.
The definition in secondary law ensures additional legal certainty without undermining the thrust of the Directive.
The definition in secondary law ensures additional legal certainty without undermining the thrust of the Directive.
At the same time, due account is taken of the fact that the basic right of freedom to choose one's profession may only be framed or limited by the legislator.
At the same time, due account is taken of the fact that the basic right of freedom to choose one's profession may only be framed or limited by the legislator.
This removes the concern that lower-ranking statutes of professional organisations might acquire higher-ranking importance, not subject to scrutiny by the legislator.
This removes the concern that lower-ranking statutes of professional organisations might acquire higher-ranking importance, not subject to scrutiny by the legislator.
(11) V případě povolání, na něž se vztahuje obecný systém pro uznávání kvalifikací (dále jen „obecný systém“), by mělo být členským státům ponecháno právo stanovit minimální úroveň kvalifikace, která by zaručovala kvalitu služeb poskytovaných na jejich území.
(11) In the case of the professions covered by the general system for the recognition of qualifications, hereinafter referred to as "the general system", Member States should retain the right to lay down the minimum level of qualification required to ensure the quality of the services provided on their territory.
Podle článků 10, 39 a 43 Smlouvy by však neměly členské státy vyžadovat na státních příslušnících členských států, aby získali ty kvalifikace, které obecně podmiňují ziskem diplomů vydaných v jejich vlastních vzdělávacích systémech, pokud dotyčné osoby již získaly úplnou kvalifikaci nebo její část v jiném členském státě.
However, pursuant to Articles 10, 39 and 43 of the Treaty, they should not require a national of a Member State to obtain qualifications, which they generally lay down only in terms of the diplomas awarded under their national educational system, where the person concerned has already obtained all or part of those qualifications in another Member State.
V důsledku toho by mělo být stanoveno, že každý hostitelský členský stát, ve kterém je určité povolání regulováno, musí vzít v úvahu kvalifikace získané v jiném členském státě a musí určit, zda tyto kvalifikace odpovídají kvalifikacím, které vyžaduje.
As a result, it should be laid down that any host Member State in which a profession is regulated must take account of the qualifications obtained in another Member State and assess whether they correspond to those which it requires.
Tento obecný systém uznávání kvalifikací však nebrání členskému státu v tom, aby každé osobě, která na jeho území vykonává povolání, nepředepsal specifické náležitosti, jež jsou zdůvodněny použitím profesních pravidel ospravedlněných obecným veřejným zájmem.
The general system for recognition, however, does not prevent a Member State from making any person pursuing a profession on its territory subject to specific requirements due to the application of professional rules justified by the general public interest.
Tato pravidla se týkají například organizace povolání, profesních norem včetně etických kodexů, kontroly a odpovědnosti.
Rules of this kind relate, for example, to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
Konečně tato směrnice nemá zasahovat do oprávněného zájmu členských států, aby se jejich státní příslušníci nevyhýbali uplatňování vnitrostátního práva v oblasti povolání.
Lastly, this Directive is not intended to interfere with Member States’ legitimate interest in preventing any of their citizens from evading enforcement of the national law relating to professions.
It seems necessary to clarify what kind of additional rules a host Member State could invoke in relation to a service provider moving from one country to another.
It seems necessary to clarify what kind of additional rules a host Member State could invoke in relation to a service provider moving from one country to another.
By virtue of the case law of the Court of Justice (not least the Van Binsbergen judgment), the power of host Member States to make service providers comply with rules on professional qualifications covers more than disciplinary rules.
By virtue of the case law of the Court of Justice (not least the Van Binsbergen judgment), the power of host Member States to make service providers comply with rules on professional qualifications covers more than disciplinary rules.
The recital, as amended above, explicitly states that the rules in question relate to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
The recital, as amended above, explicitly states that the rules in question relate to organisation of the profession, professional standards, including those concerning ethics, and supervision and liability.
(11a) Tato směrnice upravuje uznávání odborných kvalifikací členskými státy získaných v jiných členských státech.
(11a) This Directive concerns the recognition by Member States of professional qualifications acquired in other Member States.
Neupravuje však to, zda mají členské státy uznávat rozhodnutí jiných členských států o uznání v souladu s touto směrnicí.
It does not, however, concern the recognition by Member States of recognition decisions adopted by other Member States pursuant to this Directive.