natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
d) požadavky na nákup, výměnu či zdokonalení vybavení , které má účinnou spotřebu energie ve všech režimech včetně pohotovostního, přičemž se tam, kde je lze použít jako kritéria hodnocení, použijí minimalizované náklady na životnost nebo srovnatelné metody k zajištění nákladové efektivnosti;
(d) requirements to purchase, replace or retrofit equipment that provides efficient energy consumption in all modes, including in standby mode, using, where applicable as evaluation criteria, minimised life cycle cost or comparable methods to ensure cost-effectiveness ;
e) požadavky používat energetické audity a provádět následná nákladově efektivní doporučení.
(e) requirements to use energy audits and implement the resulting cost-effective recommendations.
e) požadavky projektovat a stavět energeticky účinné budovy, přičemž se tam, kde je lze použít jako kritéria hodnocení, použijí minimalizované náklady na životnost nebo srovnatelné metody k zajištění nákladové efektivnosti;
(e) requirements to plan and construct energy efficient buildings, using, where applicable as evaluation criteria, minimised life cycle cost or comparable methods to ensure cost-effectiveness ;
ea) požadavky kupovat nebo pronajímat energeticky účinné budovy či jejich části nebo požadavky na výměnu či zdokonalení zakoupených nebo pronajatých budov či jejich částí s cílem zvýšit jejich energetickou účinnost, přičemž se tam, kde je lze použít jako kritéria hodnocení, použijí minimalizované náklady na životnost nebo srovnatelné metody k zajištění nákladové efektivnosti;
(ea) requirements to purchase or rent energy-efficient buildings or parts thereof, or requirements to replace or retrofit purchased or rented buildings or parts thereof in order to render them more energy-efficient using, where applicable as evaluation criteria, minimised life cycle cost or comparable methods to ensure cost-effectiveness .
The European Parliament's position at first reading
The European Parliament's position at first reading
On 7 June 2005 the European Parliament adopted the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services by a large majority, with cross-party support.
On 7 June 2005 the European Parliament adopted the report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services by a large majority, with cross-party support.
In it, Parliament gave its support in principle to the approach chosen by the Commission.
In it, Parliament gave its support in principle to the approach chosen by the Commission.
In its 99 amendments Parliament both focused in particular on greater flexibility for the Member States and greater exploitation of the potential for energy savings, and also attempted, to a greater extent than the Commission, to cover the electricity, heating and fuel markets to an equal extent.
In its 99 amendments Parliament both focused in particular on greater flexibility for the Member States and greater exploitation of the potential for energy savings, and also attempted, to a greater extent than the Commission, to cover the electricity, heating and fuel markets to an equal extent.
The European Parliament took the view that, against the backdrop of a savings potential of around 30% and of Europe's ambitions, the binding 1% annual general savings target and the 1.5% target for the public sector proposed in the Commission's draft text were too low, and an annual target over six years was too inflexible and too short-term.
The European Parliament took the view that, against the backdrop of a savings potential of around 30% and of Europe's ambitions, the binding 1% annual general savings target and the 1.5% target for the public sector proposed in the Commission's draft text were too low, and an annual target over six years was too inflexible and too short-term.
It therefore adopted a binding three-stage energy savings target of 11.5% over nine years (with binding intermediate targets of 3%, 4% and 4.5%), and a target of 16% for the public sector, on the grounds of its exemplary role.
It therefore adopted a binding three-stage energy savings target of 11.5% over nine years (with binding intermediate targets of 3%, 4% and 4.5%), and a target of 16% for the public sector, on the grounds of its exemplary role.
As proposed by the Commission, an evaluation was to be made using a unified bottom-up system.
As proposed by the Commission, an evaluation was to be made using a unified bottom-up system.
This would also provide greater incentives for the creation of a genuine, functioning market in energy services and secure the aim of creating equal opportunities in the provision of energy services and ensuring that independent, high-quality energy services would be available for each sector.
This would also provide greater incentives for the creation of a genuine, functioning market in energy services and secure the aim of creating equal opportunities in the provision of energy services and ensuring that independent, high-quality energy services would be available for each sector.
Owing to their predominant role in promoting energy services, energy distributors were to be involved.
Owing to their predominant role in promoting energy services, energy distributors were to be involved.
While they were released from the proposed obligation to offer energy audits free of charge, up to a certain level, they were nonetheless to continue to offer, and actively promote, energy services as an integral component of energy distribution and/or sales.
While they were released from the proposed obligation to offer energy audits free of charge, up to a certain level, they were nonetheless to continue to offer, and actively promote, energy services as an integral component of energy distribution and/or sales.
The European Parliament also felt that it was important for the fuel and transport sectors to face up to their special obligations regarding energy efficiency and energy savings.
The European Parliament also felt that it was important for the fuel and transport sectors to face up to their special obligations regarding energy efficiency and energy savings.
In its amendments, Parliament also highlighted the importance of providing information and advice on energy efficiency and energy savings, and of consumer rights, especially with regard to informative billing of energy consumption.
In its amendments, Parliament also highlighted the importance of providing information and advice on energy efficiency and energy savings, and of consumer rights, especially with regard to informative billing of energy consumption.
Finally, Parliament proposed making greater use of setting indicators and benchmarks relating to target attainment.
Finally, Parliament proposed making greater use of setting indicators and benchmarks relating to target attainment.
In June 2005 the Council reached a political agreement on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services.
In June 2005 the Council reached a political agreement on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services.
The Council's common position was forwarded to the European Parliament on 27 September.
The Council's common position was forwarded to the European Parliament on 27 September.
In its common position the Council diverges in some respects very sharply from the Commission proposal and thus also from the European Parliament's position.
In its common position the Council diverges in some respects very sharply from the Commission proposal and thus also from the European Parliament's position.
Although the Council accepted a number of Parliament's amendments - substantively, partly or in principle - in its common position, major differences remain on the key points.
Although the Council accepted a number of Parliament's amendments - substantively, partly or in principle - in its common position, major differences remain on the key points.
Where targets are concerned the Council common position envisages only indicative targets of 6% over six years, and only an exemplary role in principle for the public sector, without setting specific targets.
Where targets are concerned the Council common position envisages only indicative targets of 6% over six years, and only an exemplary role in principle for the public sector, without setting specific targets.
An evaluation is to be carried out using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, but it remains unclear what their relationship to each other is to be, to what extent the bottom-up element is to increase, and how a uniform calculation model can be guaranteed for all the Member States.
An evaluation is to be carried out using a combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches, but it remains unclear what their relationship to each other is to be, to what extent the bottom-up element is to increase, and how a uniform calculation model can be guaranteed for all the Member States.
The inclusion of energy distributors is weakened in that they may also contribute to promoting energy efficiency measures under voluntary agreements.
The inclusion of energy distributors is weakened in that they may also contribute to promoting energy efficiency measures under voluntary agreements.
The Council common position makes no provision for the Member States to be responsible for a beefed-up policy on information and advice concerning energy efficiency and energy savings, and similarly informative billing or individual meters will be obtainable only 'where appropriate'.
The Council common position makes no provision for the Member States to be responsible for a beefed-up policy on information and advice concerning energy efficiency and energy savings, and similarly informative billing or individual meters will be obtainable only 'where appropriate'.
The transport sector is barely mentioned, and even some of the examples of efficiency measures in the transport sector have been deleted from the annex.
The transport sector is barely mentioned, and even some of the examples of efficiency measures in the transport sector have been deleted from the annex.
Benchmarks are not mentioned in the common position.
Benchmarks are not mentioned in the common position.
The recommendation for second reading
The recommendation for second reading
Your rapporteur seeks to achieve two aims with her report.
Your rapporteur seeks to achieve two aims with her report.
First, basically to retain the clear approach adopted by the Commission and Parliament, in order to achieve genuine progress on energy efficiency and energy savings and with creating and strengthening a market for energy services, and secondly, to propose compromises which do justice to both standpoints.
First, basically to retain the clear approach adopted by the Commission and Parliament, in order to achieve genuine progress on energy efficiency and energy savings and with creating and strengthening a market for energy services, and secondly, to propose compromises which do justice to both standpoints.
In particular, she allows the Member States even greater flexibility with regard to targets and the public sector.
In particular, she allows the Member States even greater flexibility with regard to targets and the public sector.
Although the binding savings target of 11.5% is retained, the Member States may now set the three intermediate targets themselves.
Although the binding savings target of 11.5% is retained, the Member States may now set the three intermediate targets themselves.
The Member States themselves are now to set binding targets for the public sector which reflect its exemplary role and take account of the energy efficiency and energy savings measures implemented at regional and local level.
The Member States themselves are now to set binding targets for the public sector which reflect its exemplary role and take account of the energy efficiency and energy savings measures implemented at regional and local level.
However, it remains essential for the public sector to take energy efficiency into account in public procurement, to lay down guidelines on energy efficiency and energy savings with regard to investment and operating budgets and activities, and to establish energy efficiency as an assessment criterion in competitive tendering for public contracts.
However, it remains essential for the public sector to take energy efficiency into account in public procurement, to lay down guidelines on energy efficiency and energy savings with regard to investment and operating budgets and activities, and to establish energy efficiency as an assessment criterion in competitive tendering for public contracts.
Particular emphasis is placed on reporting and monitoring, in order to press the Member States into undertaking long-term comprehensive plans for energy efficiency and energy savings.
Particular emphasis is placed on reporting and monitoring, in order to press the Member States into undertaking long-term comprehensive plans for energy efficiency and energy savings.
The Member States are to use energy efficiency action plans (these were proposed in the Green Paper on energy efficiency, as well) as a means of informing the Commission, every three years, about the measures that they have planned and implemented to achieve the targets.
The Member States are to use energy efficiency action plans (these were proposed in the Green Paper on energy efficiency, as well) as a means of informing the Commission, every three years, about the measures that they have planned and implemented to achieve the targets.
The action plans are to encompass the setting of an individual national three-year target and present the efficiency measures, in all the relevant areas, which are planned to achieve that target, including benchmarks, together with information about administration, implementation and evaluation.
The action plans are to encompass the setting of an individual national three-year target and present the efficiency measures, in all the relevant areas, which are planned to achieve that target, including benchmarks, together with information about administration, implementation and evaluation.
From the second action plan onwards this is to be accompanied by an analysis and assessment of the previous plan, particularly with regard to the achievement of the targets set; this will include a best-practice analysis.
From the second action plan onwards this is to be accompanied by an analysis and assessment of the previous plan, particularly with regard to the achievement of the targets set; this will include a best-practice analysis.
After the expiry of the application of this Directive, the energy efficiency action plan will also act as a final report.
After the expiry of the application of this Directive, the energy efficiency action plan will also act as a final report.
The energy efficiency plans thus serve the purpose not only of reporting, but in particular as signposts for action on energy efficiency and energy savings for each Member State and its citizens.
The energy efficiency plans thus serve the purpose not only of reporting, but in particular as signposts for action on energy efficiency and energy savings for each Member State and its citizens.
This also means that Member States can incorporate into these action plans reporting obligations concerning energy efficiency and energy savings which stem from other directives.
This also means that Member States can incorporate into these action plans reporting obligations concerning energy efficiency and energy savings which stem from other directives.
This rational and necessary pooling of reporting obligations will also help to reduce bureaucracy, especially since the obligations under the SAVE Directive will disappear as a result of this Directive.
This rational and necessary pooling of reporting obligations will also help to reduce bureaucracy, especially since the obligations under the SAVE Directive will disappear as a result of this Directive.
Where the evaluation of measures is concerned, your rapporteur now proposes, as a compromise, a combination of bottom-up and top-down calculation methods.
Where the evaluation of measures is concerned, your rapporteur now proposes, as a compromise, a combination of bottom-up and top-down calculation methods.
However, this must include a predetermined, gradual increase in the bottom-up element, and guarantee that the calculation model becomes uniform throughout Europe.
However, this must include a predetermined, gradual increase in the bottom-up element, and guarantee that the calculation model becomes uniform throughout Europe.
The final target of 11.5% after nine years must then be evaluated with the maximum share of bottom-up which has then been achieved.
The final target of 11.5% after nine years must then be evaluated with the maximum share of bottom-up which has then been achieved.
Your rapporteur is aware that such a combination indirectly reduces the size of the target, because inaccuracies of 1-2% may occur as a result of top-down calculations.
Your rapporteur is aware that such a combination indirectly reduces the size of the target, because inaccuracies of 1-2% may occur as a result of top-down calculations.
Consequently, maintaining the target at 11.5% is also a concession to the Council, but at the same time this makes it vital to stick to the targets set.
Consequently, maintaining the target at 11.5% is also a concession to the Council, but at the same time this makes it vital to stick to the targets set.
Your rapporteur has also restored the European Parliament's amendments on the inclusion of energy distributors, the Member States' policies on information and advice, and consumers' rights.
Your rapporteur has also restored the European Parliament's amendments on the inclusion of energy distributors, the Member States' policies on information and advice, and consumers' rights.
There was no ambiguity in the European Parliament's decision about the need for an energy efficiency offensive.
There was no ambiguity in the European Parliament's decision about the need for an energy efficiency offensive.
The urgent need for this has become even more obvious recently, with massive oil price increases and devastating environmental disasters.
The urgent need for this has become even more obvious recently, with massive oil price increases and devastating environmental disasters.
Some Member States have already reacted to these challenges and embarked on, or stepped up, a commitment to increased energy efficiency.
Some Member States have already reacted to these challenges and embarked on, or stepped up, a commitment to increased energy efficiency.
Denmark, for instance, as the country with probably the highest standards of energy efficiency, has decided to make binding annual energy savings of 1.7%.
Denmark, for instance, as the country with probably the highest standards of energy efficiency, has decided to make binding annual energy savings of 1.7%.
The Netherlands will follow, with a binding annual savings target of 1.5%.
The Netherlands will follow, with a binding annual savings target of 1.5%.
Upper Austria, which is also an exemplary model for energy savings, has already transposed the substance of the Commission proposal.
Upper Austria, which is also an exemplary model for energy savings, has already transposed the substance of the Commission proposal.
This commitment demonstrates two things: first, that countries which have already done a great deal with regard to energy efficiency and energy savings still have great potential for cost-effectiveness, and secondly, that those countries, in particular, which already have experience with energy efficiency measures recognise this as a win-win situation and are therefore sticking with it and even increasing their efforts.
This commitment demonstrates two things: first, that countries which have already done a great deal with regard to energy efficiency and energy savings still have great potential for cost-effectiveness, and secondly, that those countries, in particular, which already have experience with energy efficiency measures recognise this as a win-win situation and are therefore sticking with it and even increasing their efforts.
This Directive must therefore create an instrument promoting energy efficiency and energy savings which will produce those effects in all the Member States.
This Directive must therefore create an instrument promoting energy efficiency and energy savings which will produce those effects in all the Member States.
Examples from many countries show that the measures in this Directive will promote economic growth and innovation and contribute to the achievement of the Kyoto and Lisbon objectives.
Examples from many countries show that the measures in this Directive will promote economic growth and innovation and contribute to the achievement of the Kyoto and Lisbon objectives.
Společný postoj Rady ohledně přijetí směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady o energetické účinnosti u konečného uživatele a o energetických službách a o zrušení směrnice Rady 93/76/EHS
Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC
Mechtild Rothe 27.9.2005
Mechtild Rothe 27.9.2005
Ivo Belet, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Vincenzo Lavarra, Nils Lundgren, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
Ivo Belet, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Joan Calabuig Rull, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein Mintz, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Vincenzo Lavarra, Nils Lundgren, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Umberto Pirilli, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, Dominique Vlasto
PE 364.919v02-00
PE 364.919v02-00
o stupni připravenosti Rumunska na přistoupení k Evropské unii
on the extent of Romania's readiness for accession to the European Union
– s ohledem na smlouvu o přistoupení uzavřenou mezi Rumunskem a Evropskou unií dne 25. dubna 2005,
– having regard to the Treaty of accession signed by Romania and the European Union on 25 April 2005,
– s ohledem na všechna svá usnesení a na všechny své předchozí zprávy od počátku procesu rozšíření do dnešního dne,
– having regard to all its resolutions and previous reports, from the beginning of the enlargement process to the present day,
– s ohledem na celkovou zprávu o postupu týkající se stupňů připravenosti na přistoupení k Evropské unii ze dne 25. října 2005 ( KOM(2005)0534 ),
– having regard to the general progress report of 25 October 2005 on the extent of the countries’ readiness for accession to the European Union (COM (2005)0534),
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro zahraniční věci ( A6‑0344/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0344/2005 ),