natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Patients now need not only protection but also the ability to make use of the medical advances and differentiation in the health sector, which should be reflected in the legislation, particularly in terms of information and the right to freedom of choice in health care.
Patients now need not only protection but also the ability to make use of the medical advances and differentiation in the health sector, which should be reflected in the legislation, particularly in terms of information and the right to freedom of choice in health care.
Příloha 2 cíl 5 bod 5.4 (nový)
Annex 2, Objective 5, point 5.4. (new)
ZAČLEŇOVÁNÍ OTÁZEK ZDRAVÍ DO POLITIK SPOLEČENSTVÍ
INTEGRATING HEALTH CONCERNS INTO OTHER COMMUNITY POLICIES
Rozvoj a používání metod hodnocení dopadu politik a činností Společenství na zdraví.
Development and application of methods to assess the impact of Community policies and activities on health.
Výměna osvědčených postupů v oblasti národních politik mezi členskými státy.
Exchange best practice with Member States on national policies.
Studie dopadů jiných politik na oblast zdraví.
Studies on impact of other policies on health.
Replaces amendment 86.There must be close coordination between health actions and other community policies.
Replaces amendment 86.There must be close coordination between health actions and other community policies.
Příloha 2 cíl 5 podtitul 3 (nový) po bodu 5.5.
Annex 2, Objective 5, subtitle 3 (new) after point 5.5.
RIZIKA, BEZPEČNOST A HORIZONTÁLNÍ OTÁZKY
RISKS, SAFETY AND HORIZONTAL ISSUES
Příloha 2 Cíl 5 bod 5.5. (nový)
Annex 2, Objective 5, point 5.5. (new)
Podpora mezinárodní spolupráce v oblasti zdravotnictví
Promote international co-operation related to health
Spolupráce s mezinárodními organizacemi.
Co- operation measures with international organisations.
Spolupráce s třetími zeměmi, které se programu neúčastní.
Co-operation measures with third countries who are not participating in the programme.
Podpora dialogu se zdravotnickými organizacemi.
Encourage health organisations’ dialogue.
Modified version of the point 4 of original Annex 1.
Modified version of the point 4 of original Annex 1.
Příloha 2 Cíl 5 bod 5.6. (nový)
Annex 2, Objective 5, point 5.6.(new)
Zlepšení včasného rozpoznání a hodnocení rizik a informování o nich:
Improve the early detection, evaluation and communication of risks by:
Shromažďování a srovnávání informací a vytváření sítí odborníků a ústavů.
The collection and collation of information and establishment of networks of specialists and institutes.
Podpora rozvoje a harmonizace metod hodnocení rizik.
Promoting the development and harmonisation of risk assessment methodologies.
Akce zaměřené na shromažďování a hodnocení informací o vystavování populace a jejích podskupin chemickým, biologickým a fyzikálním rizikovým faktorům ohrožujícím zdraví, včetně účinků těchto rizikových faktorů.
Actions for collecting and assessing information on the exposure of populations and sub-groups to chemical, biological and physical hazards to health, including the effects of such hazards.
Stanovení mechanizmů pro včasné rozpoznání vznikajících rizik a opatření proti nově zjištěným rizikům.
Establishing mechanisms concerning early detection of emerging risks and action on newly identified risks.
Strategie pro lepší informování o riziích.
Strategies to improve risk communication.
1 Úř. věst.
1 OJ L 66, 4.3.2004, p.
Modified version of the point 5 of original Annex 1.
Modified version of the point 5 of original Annex 1.
Příloha 2 Cíl 5 bod 5.7. (nový)
Annex 2, Objective 5, point 5.7. (new)
Podpora bezpečnosti orgánů, látek lidského původu, krve a krevních derivátů
Promote the safety of organs, substances of human origin, blood and blood derivatives
Opatření pro zvýšení bezpečnosti a kvality orgánů a látek lidského původu, včetně krve, krevních složek a krevních prekurzorů.
Activities to help enhance the safety and quality of organs and substances of human origin, including blood, blood components and blood precursors.
Podpora strategií a mechanizmů na podporu transplantací od živých dárců a řešení otázky nedostatku orgánů s příhlédnutím k etickým problémům.
Supporting strategies and mechanisms for the promotion of living donor transplantation and for tackling the issue of organ shortage taking into account ethical considerations.
Vytvoření a relizace společných platforem mezi dárci a příjemci za účelem stanovení osvědčené praxe týkající se orgánů a látek lidského původu.
Developing and operating common platforms between donors and recipients for establishing best practice on organs and substances of human origin.
Vytvoření evropské karty dárce orgánů.
Creating a European organ donor card.
First sub-point originally in Annex 1, point 6.5.
First sub-point originally in Annex 1, point 6.5.
The two new sub-points complement the first one.
The two new sub-points complement the first one.
Additional improvement and development of measures in the field of organ transplants.
Additional improvement and development of measures in the field of organ transplants.
Creating an organ donor card valid throughout Europe will help to make valuable and safe organs and substances of human origin available for purposes of medical treatment throughout Europe and afford access to them everywhere in the Community.
Creating an organ donor card valid throughout Europe will help to make valuable and safe organs and substances of human origin available for purposes of medical treatment throughout Europe and afford access to them everywhere in the Community.
Příloha 2 Cíl 5 bod 5.8. (nový)
Annex 2, Objective 5, point 5.8. (new)
Technická pomoc při analýze problémů týkajících se rozvoje a provádění politik a právních předpisů.
Technical assistance for the analysis of issues related to the development and implementation of policies and legislation.
Additional improvement and development of joint actions to promote Community synergy.
Additional improvement and development of joint actions to promote Community synergy.
Annex 3 is covered by the report on the Consumer Protection Programme.
Annex 3 is covered by the report on the Consumer Protection Programme.
Public health is a commodity of prime importance and its protection concerns everyone without exception.
Public health is a commodity of prime importance and its protection concerns everyone without exception.
The introduction of health protection into the Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 11-35) officially sets out this generally held conviction and, at the same time, the obligation to give it prominence as a major priority of the European Union.
The introduction of health protection into the Charter of Fundamental Rights (Article 11-35) officially sets out this generally held conviction and, at the same time, the obligation to give it prominence as a major priority of the European Union.
In particular, the Treaties require the Community to play an active role in the field of public health by taking measures which cannot be taken by the Member States.
In particular, the Treaties require the Community to play an active role in the field of public health by taking measures which cannot be taken by the Member States.
Article 152 of the Treaty sets out three objectives for Community action - improving public health, preventing disease in all its forms and obviating sources of danger.
Article 152 of the Treaty sets out three objectives for Community action - improving public health, preventing disease in all its forms and obviating sources of danger.
It also provides for Community coordination and cooperation with the Member States to support actions in the field of public health, while competence and responsibility for health services (hospitals etc.), lie with the Member States (subsidiarity principle).
It also provides for Community coordination and cooperation with the Member States to support actions in the field of public health, while competence and responsibility for health services (hospitals etc.), lie with the Member States (subsidiarity principle).
Drawing up action programmes allows the Commission to shape and develop policy and action in the field of public health in order to achieve the objectives of the Treaty.
Drawing up action programmes allows the Commission to shape and develop policy and action in the field of public health in order to achieve the objectives of the Treaty.
Background to the proposal for a decision
Background to the proposal for a decision
On 6 April 2005, the Commission submitted a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council
On 6 April 2005, the Commission submitted a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council
COM(2005) 115 final. establishing a programme of Community action in the field of health and consumer protection 2007-2013; Article 251 was specified as the procedure under which that decision would be taken, i.e. the co-decision procedure between the European Parliament and the Council.
COM(2005) 115 final. establishing a programme of Community action in the field of health and consumer protection 2007-2013; Article 251 was specified as the procedure under which that decision would be taken, i.e. the co-decision procedure between the European Parliament and the Council.
In specific terms, the proposal for a decision concerns the establishment of a programme covering two separate articles of the EC Treaty, Article 152 concerning public health and Article 153 concerning consumer protection.
In specific terms, the proposal for a decision concerns the establishment of a programme covering two separate articles of the EC Treaty, Article 152 concerning public health and Article 153 concerning consumer protection.
The Community has in fact previously adopted two separate programmes on the basis of these articles, viz. the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004-2007
The Community has in fact previously adopted two separate programmes on the basis of these articles, viz. the general framework for financing Community actions in support of consumer policy for the years 2004-2007
Decision No 1786/2002/EC, OJ L 271, 9.10.2002. , with a budget of € 354 million (annual average of € 59 million), which is the first integrated programme in the field of public health.
Decision No 1786/2002/EC, OJ L 271, 9.10.2002. , with a budget of € 354 million (annual average of € 59 million), which is the first integrated programme in the field of public health.
Remarks on procedure - decision to split the programme
Remarks on procedure - decision to split the programme
In the explanatory memorandum to the proposal for a decision, the Commission points out that the programmes in the Union are fragmented and that the actions in the fields of consumer protection and public health share common objectives.
In the explanatory memorandum to the proposal for a decision, the Commission points out that the programmes in the Union are fragmented and that the actions in the fields of consumer protection and public health share common objectives.
Although the simplification and rationalisation of Community programmes may be an objective, the merger of the two areas of policy into a single programme cannot disguise the different nature of those areas of policy and the different level of involvement of the Union.
Although the simplification and rationalisation of Community programmes may be an objective, the merger of the two areas of policy into a single programme cannot disguise the different nature of those areas of policy and the different level of involvement of the Union.
On 30 June 2005, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament approved splitting the proposal into two parts, while the two committees responsible (the Committee on the Environment and the Committee on the Internal Market) were asked to ensure that the reports to be submitted would not contain contradictory amendments to one or the other part of the legislative proposal, and that the splitting of the proposal would enable the Committee on Budgets to examine the budgetary aspects of all elements of the proposal.
On 30 June 2005, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament approved splitting the proposal into two parts, while the two committees responsible (the Committee on the Environment and the Committee on the Internal Market) were asked to ensure that the reports to be submitted would not contain contradictory amendments to one or the other part of the legislative proposal, and that the splitting of the proposal would enable the Committee on Budgets to examine the budgetary aspects of all elements of the proposal.
Your rapporteur must also stress that each area, i.e. public health and consumer protection, has its own priorities and specific features, and each is both multi-faceted and complex.
Your rapporteur must also stress that each area, i.e. public health and consumer protection, has its own priorities and specific features, and each is both multi-faceted and complex.
Consequently, when we address both of these vast and sensitive areas simultaneously, there is a risk that we focus our attention only on their common points and do not cover all of the aspects involved.
Consequently, when we address both of these vast and sensitive areas simultaneously, there is a risk that we focus our attention only on their common points and do not cover all of the aspects involved.
Everything therefore points to two separate programmes so that each subject can be dealt with fully.
Everything therefore points to two separate programmes so that each subject can be dealt with fully.
This does not prevent the Commission's departments from managing the two programmes jointly, in particular on points where they overlap.
This does not prevent the Commission's departments from managing the two programmes jointly, in particular on points where they overlap.
Review of the Union's second health programme
Review of the Union 's second health programme
The split into two programmes has prompted your rapporteur to submit a number of amendments to produce a cohesive and substantive health programmes which meets the requirements of the EU and the aspirations as well as the needs of the public for better health for all.
The split into two programmes has prompted your rapporteur to submit a number of amendments to produce a cohesive and substantive health programmes which meets the requirements of the EU and the aspirations as well as the needs of the public for better health for all.
Without a doubt, the experience gained from the first programme, for which it was my honour to be the EP's rapporteur, has made an instrumental contribution to my proposal.
Without a doubt, the experience gained from the first programme, for which it was my honour to be the EP's rapporteur, has made an instrumental contribution to my proposal.
Two additional points in the second programme, ensuing from the experience already gained from implementation of the first programme, distinguish it from the first: (a) synergy between the national health systems with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness as an individual objective and (b) additional actions to consolidate further the capacity to achieve the individual objectives.
Two additional points in the second programme, ensuing from the experience already gained from implementation of the first programme, distinguish it from the first: (a) synergy between the national health systems with a view to improving efficiency and effectiveness as an individual objective and (b) additional actions to consolidate further the capacity to achieve the individual objectives.
As with the first programme, the new programme is characterised by a holistic approach both towards health and towards the means, mechanisms and practices for tackling health problems.
As with the first programme, the new programme is characterised by a holistic approach both towards health and towards the means, mechanisms and practices for tackling health problems.
It is the approach which must be adopted in order to improve, at Community level, not only the quantity of information disseminated but also its quality and, at the same time achieve more effective support and coordination for everyone involved in the health sector.
It is the approach which must be adopted in order to improve, at Community level, not only the quantity of information disseminated but also its quality and, at the same time achieve more effective support and coordination for everyone involved in the health sector.
Whether in the private or public sector, help must be given to stakeholders to draw up and develop the priorities of the programme, focusing throughout on the cohesion and coordination of its actions.
Whether in the private or public sector, help must be given to stakeholders to draw up and develop the priorities of the programme, focusing throughout on the cohesion and coordination of its actions.
Among those actions, prominence should be given to the correct treatment of diseases and injuries through information about best medical practice in order to prevent further loss of health status.
Among those actions, prominence should be given to the correct treatment of diseases and injuries through information about best medical practice in order to prevent further loss of health status.
However, even in the case of chronic diseases and disabilities, care should be available which enables sufferers to have a better quality of life.
However, even in the case of chronic diseases and disabilities, care should be available which enables sufferers to have a better quality of life.
Consequently, a significant part of the actions should concern medical care and treatment.
Consequently, a significant part of the actions should concern medical care and treatment.
The programme is an invitation and, at the same time, a challenge to all to contribute to ensuring more effective prevention, improved health services, and a better quality of life.
The programme is an invitation and, at the same time, a challenge to all to contribute to ensuring more effective prevention, improved health services, and a better quality of life.
It should not be overlooked in this respect that there are existing differences in health services between the Member States and between areas within the same Member State as well as inequalities in access to good health services for citizens.
It should not be overlooked in this respect that there are existing differences in health services between the Member States and between areas within the same Member State as well as inequalities in access to good health services for citizens.
Bridging these gaps, in combination with synergy between the national health services, is therefore an important aspect of the programme.
Bridging these gaps, in combination with synergy between the national health services, is therefore an important aspect of the programme.
The objectives of the programme
The objectives of the programme
The objectives of the programme as set out in my proposal are as follows:
The objectives of the programme as set out in my proposal are as follows:
- to protect citizens against health threats,
- to protect citizens against health threats,
- to promote policies that lead to a healthier way of life,
- to promote policies that lead to a healthier way of life,
- to contribute to the development of more effective and efficient health systems,
- to contribute to the development of more effective and efficient health systems,
- to improve information and knowledge in order to further the development of health and to incorporate the objectives of the policy implemented in the fields of health in other Community policies (mainstreaming)..
- to improve information and knowledge in order to further the development of health and to incorporate the objectives of the policy implemented in the fields of health in other Community policies (mainstreaming)..
The programme will also contribute to:
The programme will also contribute to:
- ensuring a high level of protection for human health when formulating and implementing all Community policies and activities,
- ensuring a high level of protection for human health when formulating and implementing all Community policies and activities,
- promoting a holistic approach to health,
- promoting a holistic approach to health,
- tackling health inequalities,
- tackling health inequalities,
- encouraging cooperation between the Member States in the fields covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.
- encouraging cooperation between the Member States in the fields covered by Article 152 of the Treaty.
Actions and support measures for the objectives
Actions and support measures for the objectives
The new programme includes the following actions:
The new programme includes the following actions:
- promoting health and access to information so that European citizens are in a position to make beneficial choices for health,
- promoting health and access to information so that European citizens are in a position to make beneficial choices for health,
- responding to health threats in a coordinated manner at European level, as in the case of epidemics, diseases such as HIV/AIDS, bioterrorism etc.,
- responding to health threats in a coordinated manner at European level, as in the case of epidemics, diseases such as HIV/AIDS, bioterrorism etc.,
- preventing disease by tackling health determinants such as those related to lifestyle (diet, smoking, consumption of alcohol) as well as to additional factors, genetic, environmental, socio-economic etc. which demonstrably affect both physical and mental health,
- preventing disease by tackling health determinants such as those related to lifestyle (diet, smoking, consumption of alcohol) as well as to additional factors, genetic, environmental, socio-economic etc. which demonstrably affect both physical and mental health,
- preventing further loss of health status of an individual by means of applying sound medical practice and the most modern methods of treating diseases.
- preventing further loss of health status of an individual by means of applying sound medical practice and the most modern methods of treating diseases.
It is also obvious that the criterion for evaluating treatment cannot be the financial cost but the effectiveness, which is also a long-term financial consideration.
It is also obvious that the criterion for evaluating treatment cannot be the financial cost but the effectiveness, which is also a long-term financial consideration.
- ensuring, by means of information, the best possible treatment for sufferers of chronic disease and disabilities, which will offer them a corresponding quality of life,
- ensuring, by means of information, the best possible treatment for sufferers of chronic disease and disabilities, which will offer them a corresponding quality of life,
- bridging the gaps at the level of Member States' health systems and the inequalities faced by European citizens in gaining access to good health services, and the appropriate treatment.
- bridging the gaps at the level of Member States' health systems and the inequalities faced by European citizens in gaining access to good health services, and the appropriate treatment.
These inequalities as a rule affect social groups with shared characteristics, be they unemployed, isolated, with personal and family difficulties, often immigrants, with chronic diseases, often mental illness and/or disability,
These inequalities as a rule affect social groups with shared characteristics, be they unemployed, isolated, with personal and family difficulties, often immigrants, with chronic diseases, often mental illness and/or disability,