natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PŘÍLOHA 2..............................................................................................................................15
ANNEX 2.................................................................................................................................15
– s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství pro atomovou energii a zejména na článek 177 této smlouvy,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 177 thereof,
– s ohledem na nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 1605/2002 ze dne 25. června 2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenství
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 27 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
– s ohledem na rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady ze dne ... o využití nástroje pružnosti podle bodu 24 výše uvedené interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999 pro poskytování pomoci při obnově a rekonstrukci v zemích, které byly postiženy vlnou tsunami,
– having regard to the decision of the European Parliament and of the Council of xxx on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument according to point 24 of the abovementioned Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 in favour of the rehabilitation and reconstruction assistance of the Tsunami-affected countries,
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh opravného rozpočtu Evropské unie č. 3/2005 na rozpočtový rok 2005, který předložila Komise dne 27. dubna 2005 ( SEK(2005)0548 ),
– having regard to Preliminary draft amending budget No 3/2005 of the European Union for the financial year 2005, which the Commission presented on 27 April 2005 ( SEC(2005)0548 ),
– s ohledem na návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 4/2005 sestavený Radou dne 15. července 2005 (11220/2005 – C6‑0239/2005 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 4/2005, which the Council established on 15 July 2005 (11220/2005 - C6‑0239/2005 ),
– s ohledem na článek 69 a na přílohu IV jednacího řádu,
– having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru ( A6‑0255/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0255/2005 ),
A. vzhledem k tomu, že Evropská unie by měla dostát svému slibu poskytnout 350 milionů EUR na projekty obnovy a rekonstrukce v oblastech postižených vlnou tsunami, z nichž 170 milionů EUR by mělo být zahrnuto do rozpočtu na rok 2005,
A. whereas the European Union should fulfil its pledge of EUR 350 million for rehabilitation and reconstruction measures following the tsunami disaster, out of which EUR 170 million should be budgeted in 2005,
D. vzhledem k tomu, že dodatečný příspěvek ve výši 70 milionů EUR bude poskytnut s využitím rezervy pro mimořádné situace a s příslušným návrhem na převod,
D. whereas a supplementary contribution of EUR 70 million will be provided by the mobilisation of the emergency reserve and the corresponding proposal for a transfer,
E. vzhledem k tomu, že účelem tohoto návrhu opravného rozpočtu č. 4/2005 je začlenit do rozpočtu částku 15 milionů EUR, která bude uvolněna na základě rozhodnutí Evropského parlamentu a Rady o využití nástroje pružnosti,
E. whereas the purpose of the Draft amending budget No 4/2005 is to enter into the budget the EUR 15 million mobilised through the decision of the European Parliament and the Council on the mobilisation of the flexibility instrument,
F. vzhledem k tomu, že dodatečné zdroje ve výši 60 milionů EUR budou, mimo jiné, poskytnuty v rámci omezeného přesunu prostředků, aniž by tím byly dotčeny stávající programy v Asii,
F. whereas, in addition, supplementary resources to an amount of EUR 60 million will be made available through a limited redeployment which shall not prejudice the existing Asia programmes,
G. vzhledem k tomu, že částka 12 milionů EUR bude financována prostřednictvím mechanismu rychlé reakce,
G. whereas an amount of EUR 12 million will be financed through the rapid reaction mechanism,
H. vzhledem k tomu, že návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 4/2005 rovněž pokrývá změnu poznámek v rozpočtové položce 19 10 04 tím, že uvádí odkaz na nařízení ALA, aby bylo umožněno použít navrhovanou částku prostřednictvím svěřeneckých fondů a rozpočtové podpory,
H. whereas the Draft amending budget No 4/2005 also covers a modification of the remarks against budget line 19 10 04 by adding a reference to the ALA regulation to allow the implementation of the proposed amount through Trust Funds and budget support,
I. vzhledem k tomu, že návrh opravného rozpočtu č. 4/2005 rovněž pokrývá změnu rozpočtové položky 05 08 03 umožňující uhradit OECD příspěvek na analýzu a sběr dat v řadě třetích zemí a v nových členských státech,
I. whereas the Draft amending budget No 4/2005 covers as well a modification of budget line 05 08 03, to make possible the disbursement of a subsidy to the OECD for the analysis and collection of data of several third countries and New Member States,
2. je ochoten poskytnout Evropské unii dostatečné prostředky, aby se mohla vyrovnat s novými úkoly, přičemž budou zachovány stávající rozvojové programy a nebudou ohroženy její tradiční priority;
Is willing to provide the European Union with the appropriate means to face new challenges while safeguarding ongoing development programmes and without jeopardising its traditional priorities;
P6_TA(2004)0102 , příl. , neboť potřebu řešení mezinárodních krizí od roku 2000 nelze financovat v rámci původního stropu okruhu 4 finančního výhledu;
P6_TA(2004)0102 , annex. , as the needs to face international crises since 2000 could not be financed within the initial ceilings of heading 4 of the Financial Perspective;
Z toho důvodu se domnívá, že uvolněná částka ve výši 15 milionů EUR pochází z částky převedené z roku 2004; konstatuje rovněž, že po tomto uvolnění zůstává v roce 2005 pro nástroj pružnosti k dispozici částka ve výši 293 milionů EUR;
Considers, therefore, that the mobilised amount of EUR 15 million is coming from the amount carried over since the year 2004; Notes also that after this mobilisation the amount remaining available for 2005 under the flexibility instrument is EUR 293 million.
On the 26 December 2004 a strong earthquake measuring 9 on the Richter scale hit Southeast Asia and triggered massive tsunami in the Indian Ocean.
On the 26 December 2004 a strong earthquake measuring 9 on the Richter scale hit Southeast Asia and triggered massive tsunami in the Indian Ocean.
Following the Jakarta Tsunami Aid Conference of 6 January 2005 and the International Donors Conference held in Geneva on 11 January 2005 the overview of the EU financial intervention (including the new proposals) can be summarised as follows (in million EUR):
Following the Jakarta Tsunami Aid Conference of 6 January 2005 and the International Donors Conference held in Geneva on 11 January 2005 the overview of the EU financial intervention (including the new proposals) can be summarised as follows (in million EUR):
HUMANITARIAN AID
HUMANITARIAN AID
Aid, emergency food aid
Aid, emergency food aid
Flexibility Instrument
Flexibility Instrument
Asia Envelope
Asia Envelope
Rapid Reaction Mechanism
Rapid Reaction Mechanism
Taken from Cat.IV margin
Taken from Cat.IV margin
Sub TOTAL
Sub TOTAL
EC commitment - Jakarta Tsunami Aid Conference
EC commitment - Jakarta Tsunami Aid Conference
This pledge was endorsed by the European Parliament Resolution on "EU aid for tidal wave victims in the Indian Ocean" and by the General Affairs and External Relations Council on 31 January.
This pledge was endorsed by the European Parliament Resolution on "EU aid for tidal wave victims in the Indian Ocean" and by the General Affairs and External Relations Council on 31 January.
STATE OF PLAY OF PLEDGES
STATE OF PLAY OF PLEDGES
The EC is placed amongst the three main donors after Australia and the United States.
The EC is placed amongst the three main donors after Australia and the United States.
Aside from this, the EC has a leading role in the steering Committee of the Multidonors Trust Fund of Indonesia and Sri Lanka.
Aside from this, the EC has a leading role in the steering Committee of the Multidonors Trust Fund of Indonesia and Sri Lanka.
Indonesia and Maldives have quickly endorsed their plans.
Indonesia and Maldives have quickly endorsed their plans.
Regarding Sri Lanka the mechanism to deliver reconstruction aid to the north east has been subject to hard negotiations between the Government and the guerrilla LTTE.
Regarding Sri Lanka the mechanism to deliver reconstruction aid to the north east has been subject to hard negotiations between the Government and the guerrilla LTTE.
The steering structure in Sri Lanka was finally agreed on the 24th June 2005.
The steering structure in Sri Lanka was finally agreed on the 24th June 2005.
Concerning Sri Lanka and Indonesia the EC will sign a contribution agreement with the World Bank.
Concerning Sri Lanka and Indonesia the EC will sign a contribution agreement with the World Bank.
Thereby, channelling its funds to the World Bank for the implementation.
Thereby, channelling its funds to the World Bank for the implementation.
In the case of Maldives the EC will channel its contribution through the UN's Direct Execution system in the form of a contribution agreement.
In the case of Maldives the EC will channel its contribution through the UN's Direct Execution system in the form of a contribution agreement.
The EC will be an observer in the United Nation's Development Project Steering Committee.
The EC will be an observer in the United Nation's Development Project Steering Committee.
Annex 1 presents further information on the composition and the modus operandi of the Trust Funds
Annex 1 presents further information on the composition and the modus operandi of the Trust Funds
COMMISSION PROPOSAL
COMMISSION PROPOSAL
The PDAB No 3/2005 comprises the following elements:
The PDAB No 3/2005 comprises the following elements:
1 The mobilisation of new funds for an amount of EUR 98 million in favour to the reconstruction of the countries affected by the Tsunami.
1 The mobilisation of new funds for an amount of EUR 98 million in favour to the reconstruction of the countries affected by the Tsunami.
2 To finance the remaining 72 million by the Asia envelope for EUR 60 million and by the Rapid Reaction Mechanism for EUR 12 million.
2 To finance the remaining 72 million by the Asia envelope for EUR 60 million and by the Rapid Reaction Mechanism for EUR 12 million.
3 The modification of the remarks of budget line 19 10 04, by adding a reference to the ALA regulation to allow the implementation of the proposed amount through Trust Funds and budget support
3 The modification of the remarks of budget line 19 10 04, by adding a reference to the ALA regulation to allow the implementation of the proposed amount through Trust Funds and budget support
4 The modification of the remarks of budget line 05 08 03 to make possible the disbursement of a subsidy to the OECD for the analysis and collection of data of several Third countries and New Member States.
4 The modification of the remarks of budget line 05 08 03 to make possible the disbursement of a subsidy to the OECD for the analysis and collection of data of several Third countries and New Member States.
a) Flexibility Instrument
a) Flexibility Instrument
According to the point number 24 of the IIA, the flexibility instrument annual ceiling amounts up to EUR 200 million.
According to the point number 24 of the IIA, the flexibility instrument annual ceiling amounts up to EUR 200 million.
The portion of the annual amount which is not used may be carried over up to the year n+2.
The portion of the annual amount which is not used may be carried over up to the year n+2.
The flexibility amount proposed for 2005 is EUR 98 million out of a total available of EUR 308 million (see Annex 2).
The flexibility amount proposed for 2005 is EUR 98 million out of a total available of EUR 308 million (see Annex 2).
Regarding the redeployment within the Asia envelope it should be pointed out that the Commission foresees to implement those projects affected by the Tsunami redeployment from 2007 (the redeployment implying the delay of the projects).
Regarding the redeployment within the Asia envelope it should be pointed out that the Commission foresees to implement those projects affected by the Tsunami redeployment from 2007 (the redeployment implying the delay of the projects).
The projects affected are the following ones:
The projects affected are the following ones:
Indonesia ' reconstruction (EUR 60 million in 2005 and 2006 ):
Indonesia ' reconstruction (EUR 60 million in 2005 and 2006 ):
For 2005 EUR 30 million from the ERASMUS MUNDUS programme CHINA project which has a current allocation of EUR100 million.
For 2005 EUR 30 million from the ERASMUS MUNDUS programme CHINA project which has a current allocation of EUR100 million.
For 2006 EUR 30 million out of a EUR 50 million EDUCATION PROJECT in Indonesia.
For 2006 EUR 30 million out of a EUR 50 million EDUCATION PROJECT in Indonesia.
Sri Lanka ' reconstruction (EUR 13 million in 2005 ):
Sri Lanka ' reconstruction (EUR 13 million in 2005 ):
Coming from 3 projects delayed (with a total allocation of EUR 26 million) on:
Coming from 3 projects delayed (with a total allocation of EUR 26 million) on:
o Rural development;
o Rural development;
o Civil aviation cooperation;
o Civil aviation cooperation;
o School rehabilitation.
o School rehabilitation.
Maldives ' reconstruction (EUR 2 million in 2005 ):
Maldives ' reconstruction (EUR 2 million in 2005 ):
From a regional development project that has been defined in 2004
From a regional development project that has been defined in 2004
Maldives Regional Development Project to the UNDP's Community Livelihoods Programme. , redirected to the need of building up environmental defence systems (mainly to the construction of a natural barrier to protect the islands of an other natural disaster)
Maldives Regional Development Project to the UNDP's Community Livelihoods Programme. , redirected to the need of building up environmental defence systems (mainly to the construction of a natural barrier to protect the islands of an other natural disaster)
Asia Proeco II B : This horizontal programme will focus on the Tsunami countries with an allocation of EUR15 million for 2005 .
Asia Proeco II B : This horizontal programme will focus on the Tsunami countries with an allocation of EUR15 million for 2005 .
c) Payment appropriations
c) Payment appropriations
Concerning Payment Appropriations all additional needs can be satisfied within the existing allocation in heading 4.
Concerning Payment Appropriations all additional needs can be satisfied within the existing allocation in heading 4.
If necessary, reinforcement would be requested through the global transfer after the summer or through a specific transfer during the year.
If necessary, reinforcement would be requested through the global transfer after the summer or through a specific transfer during the year.
In what regards the Margin Available after including PDAB3 in heading 4 the result would be a negative margin of EUR198 million (the share out being:100 Iraq + 98 PDAB 3).
In what regards the Margin Available after including PDAB3 in heading 4 the result would be a negative margin of EUR198 million (the share out being:100 Iraq + 98 PDAB 3).
4-REACTION TO THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL
4-REACTION TO THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL
a) The first mandate given for negotiation by the Council Budgetary Committee to the Luxembourg presidency - Results of the Council Budgetary Committee meeting of 31st May
a) The first mandate given for negotiation by the Council Budgetary Committee to the Luxembourg presidency - Results of the Council Budgetary Committee meeting of 31st May
Not to go beyond the EUR 200 million ceiling for the flexibility instrument and therefore mobilise only the 15 million that remain available;
Not to go beyond the EUR 200 million ceiling for the flexibility instrument and therefore mobilise only the 15 million that remain available;
On the basis of the former Commission 2005 implementation plan that foresaw a surplus of some EUR50 million the Budgetary Committee agreed to use the amount mobilised last year under heading 3 for Decentralised Agencies, EUR 40 million ;
On the basis of the former Commission 2005 implementation plan that foresaw a surplus of some EUR50 million the Budgetary Committee agreed to use the amount mobilised last year under heading 3 for Decentralised Agencies, EUR 40 million ;
Agreed on the EUR 12 million contribution from the Rapid Reaction Mechanism ;
Agreed on the EUR 12 million contribution from the Rapid Reaction Mechanism ;
Furthermore, the remaining amount needed, EUR 43 million would be provided by a
Furthermore, the remaining amount needed, EUR 43 million would be provided by a
negative reserve (laid down in article 44 of the Financial Regulation).
negative reserve (laid down in article 44 of the Financial Regulation).
b)Trialogue 22 nd June
b) Trialogue 22 nd June
The European Parliament made clear that Council recommendation did not suit Parliament priorities, damage Parliament 2005 budgetary Strategy, and were thereby not admissible.
The European Parliament made clear that Council recommendation did not suit Parliament priorities, damage Parliament 2005 budgetary Strategy, and were thereby not admissible.
The Trialogue delegation focused its discussion in the following points:
The Trialogue delegation focused its discussion in the following points:
Negative Reserve : Neither the Commission nor the Parliament agreed to mobilise this reserve given that it must be drawn upon before the end of the financial year by means of transfers, meaning that the Commission would have to freeze other priorities during the year to feed this reserve.
Negative Reserve : Neither the Commission nor the Parliament agreed to mobilise this reserve given that it must be drawn upon before the end of the financial year by means of transfers, meaning that the Commission would have to freeze other priorities during the year to feed this reserve.
EUR 40 million from Category III (agencies -flexibility instrument budget 2005): The Commission confirmed that this recommendation should not be followed, given that after the revision of the Commission' February forecast only EUR12 million are available in Category III .
EUR 40 million from Category III (agencies -flexibility instrument budget 2005): The Commission confirmed that this recommendation should not be followed, given that after the revision of the Commission' February forecast only EUR12 million are available in Category III .
The Parliament refused to follow this recommendation considering that it would damage considerably its 2005 budgetary strategy and priorities in Internal Policies.
The Parliament refused to follow this recommendation considering that it would damage considerably its 2005 budgetary strategy and priorities in Internal Policies.
The European Parliament reminded that it made clear in its 13 th January Resolution that the funding of the reconstruction after the Tsunami disaster should not jeopardise other priorities.
The European Parliament reminded that it made clear in its 13 th January Resolution that the funding of the reconstruction after the Tsunami disaster should not jeopardise other priorities.
Flexibility Instrument: Parliament delegation pointed out that within the margin of EUR 200 and the n+2 rule limit there is a large possibility of taking advantage of the old unused margins available.
Flexibility Instrument: Parliament delegation pointed out that within the margin of EUR 200 and the n+2 rule limit there is a large possibility of taking advantage of the old unused margins available.
The text precise that the old margins are first needed.
The text precise that the old margins are first needed.
Limiting the possibility of using 2003 and 2004 margins will be against the spirit and the letter of the text.
Limiting the possibility of using 2003 and 2004 margins will be against the spirit and the letter of the text.
The Council Delegation refused to change any of its proposals for the financing of the reconstruction of Tsunami affected countries.
The Council Delegation refused to change any of its proposals for the financing of the reconstruction of Tsunami affected countries.
The Trialogue delegation made a "constat de desaccord" and agreed to discuss on this dossier at the Trialogue of 11st of July the Commission having suggested to make a new proposal.
The Trialogue delegation made a "constat de desaccord" and agreed to discuss on this dossier at the Trialogue of 11st of July the Commission having suggested to make a new proposal.
c) The new Commission Proposal could be summarised as follows:
c) The new Commission Proposal could be summarised as follows:
FLEXIBILITY INSTRUMENT
FLEXIBILITY INSTRUMENT
EMERGENCY RESERVE
EMERGENCY RESERVE
d) The Council Budgetary Committee position can be summarised as follows:
d) The Council Budgetary Committee position can be summarised as follows:
TRIALOGUE 22ND JUNE
TRIALOGUE 22ND JUNE
TRIALOGUE 11th JULY
TRIALOGUE 11th JULY
NEGATIVE RESERVE
NEGATIVE RESERVE
e) Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council Presidency reached after the Trialogue of 11 July
e) Agreement between the European Parliament and the Council Presidency reached after the Trialogue of 11 July
EVOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION 2005
EVOLUTION IMPLEMENTATION 2005
TOTAL AGREED
TOTAL AGREED
("fresh money" - new resources)
("fresh money" - new resources)
Amounts still remaining to finance
Amounts still remaining to finance
COBU voted the Draft report on this AB ,on the 14th July, after the negotiations at the Trialogue on 22 June and 11 July and on an anticipated procedure.
COBU voted the Draft report on this AB ,on the 14th July, after the negotiations at the Trialogue on 22 June and 11 July and on an anticipated procedure.
This was done, as in the past, in order to allow to speed up the procedure and the adoption of the amending budget in a single reading in September part session , as well as the signature at the conciliation of a joint letter by the Minister Lewis and chair Lewandowski mobilising the emergency reserve for an amount of 70 million euros.
This was done, as in the past, in order to allow to speed up the procedure and the adoption of the amending budget in a single reading in September part session , as well as the signature at the conciliation of a joint letter by the Minister Lewis and chair Lewandowski mobilising the emergency reserve for an amount of 70 million euros.
This agreement was confirmed by both arms of the budgetary authority during the 15th of July Conciliation.
This agreement was confirmed by both arms of the budgetary authority during the 15th of July Conciliation.
Consequently the 15th of July the Council voted its Draft Amending Budget number 4 in line with the agreement confirmed in the Conciliation.
Consequently the 15th of July the Council voted its Draft Amending Budget number 4 in line with the agreement confirmed in the Conciliation.
Development Committee Opinion
Development Committee Opinion
The Committee on Development has voted its opinion on the PDAB No 3 last Tuesday 21of June, proposing: EUR 350 million to finance the Tsunami reconstruction in three years (instead of two years), to stick to the January Parliament's resolution on the Tsunami disaster not allowing any redeployment and to decrease the amount proposed for flexibility (up to EUR 80 million) and increase the RRM contribution (up to EUR 20 million).
The Committee on Development has voted its opinion on the PDAB No 3 last Tuesday 21of June, proposing: EUR 350 million to finance the Tsunami reconstruction in three years (instead of two years), to stick to the January Parliament's resolution on the Tsunami disaster not allowing any redeployment and to decrease the amount proposed for flexibility (up to EUR 80 million) and increase the RRM contribution (up to EUR 20 million).
Committee on Foreign Affairs Opinion
Committee on Foreign Affairs Opinion