natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(b) pohlížely na mužské násilí páchané na ženách jako na strukturální jev a hlavní překážku úsilí o překonání nerovnosti mezi muži a ženami;
(b) to regard men's violence against women as a structural phenomenon and a crucial barrier to efforts to overcome inequality between women and men;
(c) prosazovaly nulovou toleranci vůči všem formám násilí páchaného na ženách;
(c) to have zero tolerance of to all forms of violence against women
(d) přijaly rámec pro spolupráci mezi vládními a nevládními organizacemi s cílem vypracovat politiky a postupy boje proti domácímu násilí;
(d) to adopt a framework for cooperation between governmental and non-governmental organisations with a view to developing policies and practices to combat the phenomenon of domestic violence;
(e) stanovily jednotné metody, definice a kritéria ve spolupráci s Eurostatem, Agenturou pro základní práva a budoucím Institutem pro rovnost pohlaví za účelem shromažďování srovnatelných a kompatibilních údajů v rámci Evropské unie o mužském násilí páchaném na ženách, zejména komplexních studií o jeho rozsahu;
(e) to establish harmonised methodology, definitions and criteria, in cooperation with Eurostat, the Fundamental Rights Agency and the future Gender Institute, in order to gather comparable and compatible data throughout the European Union concerning men's violence against women, especially comprehensive studies of prevalence;
(f) jmenovaly národní zpravodaje, kteří budou informace a statistiky o mužském násilí páchaném na ženách, včetně informací o dětech vyrůstajících v agresivním prostředí, shromažďovat, vyměňovat si je a zpracovávat a budou napomáhat výměně osvědčených postupů mezi členskými státy a přistupujícími a kandidátskými zeměmi;
(f) to appoint national rapporteurs to gather, exchange and process information and statistics on men's violence against women, including information on children growing up in violent environments, and promote the exchange of best practice between Member States and the accession and candidate countries;
(g) ve veškeré činnosti týkající se mužského násilí páchaného na ženách věnovaly větší pozornost vlivu takového násilí na děti;
(g) to highlight in all work relating to men's violence against women how such violence affects the children,
(h) vytvořily jednotný systém zaznamenávání případů všemi příslušnými orgány, jako jsou soudní a policejní orgány, nemocnice a sociální služby, aby se zajistilo jednotné zaznamenávání údajů a větší rozsah jejich využitelnosti;
(h) to establish a single system of recording instances of assault by all the competent authorities, such as the judicial and police authorities, hospitals and social services, in order to ensure joint recording of the data and greater scope for utilising them;
(i) poskytovaly vhodné vzdělávání a školení pro odborné pracovníky, kteří jsou odpovědní za zaznamenávání událostí a údajů spojených s domácím násilím, aby tak mohli dostatečně konzistentně plnit své povinnosti;
(i) to provide appropriate education and training for professionals responsible for recording incidents and data relating to domestic violence so that they carry out their duties with the required consistency;
(j) vyčlenily peněžní prostředky na průzkum nákladů souvisejících s násilím, které muži páchají na ženách v EU;
(j) to earmark funds for investigation into the costs of men’s violence against women in the EU;
(k) vytvořily nezbytné prostředky pro monitorování činnosti a pokroku dosaženého potenciálními členskými státy v otázce zacházení se ženami ve všech sférách společnosti a otázku bezpečnosti a zacházení se ženami stanovily jako kritérium pro přistoupení;
(k) to establish the necessary means to monitor the activity and progress of potential Member states regarding treatment of women in all areas of society, and to make the safety and treatment of women a criteria for accession;
(l) vypracovaly programy a výzkumy zaměřené na ženy, které jsou příslušnicemi kulturně specifických komunit nebo etnických menšin, s cílem získat přehled o specifických formách násilí, kterému tyto ženy musí čelit, a plánovat vhodné metody, jak je řešit;
(l) to develop programmes and surveys targeting women who are members of culturally specific communities or ethnic minority groups, with a view to obtaining an account of the specific forms of violence that these women encounter and planning appropriate methods of dealing with them;
B) Domácí násilí
B) Domestic violence
(a) aby uznaly manželské sexuální násilí a znásilnění v manželství za trestný čin;
(a) to recognize marital sexual violence as a crime; and make rape within marriage a criminal offence;
(b) aby v případech násilí páchaného na ženách, „násilí na ochranu cti“ a případech mrzačení ženských genitálií neuznávaly jakékoliv odkazy na kulturní tradice za polehčující okolnost;
(b) not to accept any reference to cultural practice as an extenuating circumstance in cases of violence against women, crimes of honour and genital mutilation;
(c) aby spolupracovaly a vyměňovaly si informace o nejlepších postupech s orgány v zemích, které mají větší zkušenosti s problematikou „násilí na ochranu cti“;
(c) to cooperate and exchange best practice information with the authorities in countries with more experience of crimes of honor;
(d) aby oběti zajistily bezpečný přístup ke spravedlnosti a účinnému vymáhání práva, a to i poskytnutím odškodnění;
(d) to ensure victims' right to safe access to justice and effective enforcement, including by providing for compensation;
(e) aby podporovaly stíhání spolupachatelů „násilí na ochranu cti“, jako jsou členové rodiny pachatele, kteří takový trestný čin povzbuzovali nebo vyžadovali, aby bylo pevně stanoveno, že takové chování je ve společnosti nepřijatelné;
(e) to encourage the prosecution of accomplices to the honour crime, such as family members of the perpetrator who have encouraged or ordered the honour crime, in order to state firmly that such behaviour is unacceptable in society;
(f) aby vzaly v potaz skutečnost, že děti, které jsou svědky násilí na jejich matkách, by mohly být považovány za oběti, a aby tedy zvážily, zda by v souladu s vnitrostátními právními předpisy neměly mít nárok na odškodné;
(f) to take account of the fact that children who witness their mothers being battered could be regarded as victims, and thus consider whether they should be entitled to damages in accordance with national law;
(g) aby zvážily rizika společného opatrovnictví s pachatelem násilí a stanovily účinná opatření, která zajistí bezpečné střídání opatrovnictví v případech odluky a rozvodu;
(g) to consider the risks of joint custody with the perpetrator of violence and establish effective measures that will ensure safe custody exchange in cases of separation and divorce;
4. vyzývá členské státy, aby přijaly náležitá opatření k zabezpečení lepší ochrany a podpory obětem násilí páchaného na ženách a ženám, jimž hrozí násilí, a to:
Calls on the Member States to take appropriate measures to ensure better protection and support of victims and those at risk of becoming victims of violence against women by:
(a) poskytnutím kvalifikované ochrany a právních, lékařských, sociálních a psychologických služeb a pomoci včetně policejní ochrany;
(a) providing qualified protection and legal, medical, social and psychological services and aid, including police protection;
(b) poskytnutím řádného školení – zahrnujícího úhel pohledu dětí – personálu příslušných orgánů, které se zabývají násilím páchaným na ženách, jako jsou policisté, soudní personál, zdravotnický personál, vychovatelé, pracovníci s mládeží a sociální pracovníci a zaměstnanci věznic; v případě psychoterapie je zejména důležité, aby příslušný dětský psycholog nebo terapeut byl obeznámen s problematikou mužského násilí páchaného na ženách proto, aby násilí páchané otcem na matce a/nebo dítěti nebylo zlehčováno nebo trivializováno;
(b) providing proper training, including a child's perspective, to the staff of competent bodies dealing with men's violence against women, such as police officers, judicial personnel, health personnel, educators, youth and social workers , and prison staff; in the event of treatment in the form of talk therapy, it is particularly important that the child psychologist or therapist concerned is familiar with men's violence against women so that the father's violence against the mother and/or the child is not diminished or trivialised;
(c) uznáním významu poskytování pomoci obětem, ženám i dětem, která jim pomůže stát se finančně a psychicky nezávislými na pachateli násilí;
(c) recognising the importance of providing support to victims¸ both women and children, to help them become financially and psychologically independent of the perpetrator;
(d) poskytnutím veškeré nezbytné pomoci, včetně přechodného ubytování, ženám a jejich dětem v případech odluky nebo rozvodu;
(d) providing all necessary assistance, including transitional housing, to women and their children in cases of separation or divorce;
(e) poskytnutím bezpečných útočišť, včetně dostatečných finančních zdrojů
(e) providing safe shelters including sufficient financial resources;
(f) poskytnutím minimálního příjmu ženám, které nemají žádný jiný příjem, který by jim umožnil – ve spolupráci s poradenskými centry – najít způsoby, jak se úplně a relativně bezpečně znovu začlenit do společnosti;
(f) providing for a minimum income for women who have no other income to enable them to find ways of reintegrating into society as a whole in relative safety, in cooperation with the advisory centres throughout;
(g) prozkoumáním možnosti vytvořit centra pomoci, ve kterých by oběti mohly kontaktovat potřebné orgány: zástupce policie, státní zástupce a sociální a zdravotnické služby;
(g) investigating the possibility of setting up 'multi-agencies' where victims can contact the necessary authorities: representatives from the police, the public prosecutor and social and health services;
(h) plánováním služeb a center pro péči a pomoc dětem žen, které jsou oběťmi násilí;
(h) planning services and centres for the care and support of children of women who are victims of violence;
(i) poskytnutím sociální a psychologické pomoci dětem, které byly svědky domácího násilí;
(i) providing social and psychological support to children who have witnessed domestic violence;
(j) poskytnutím bezplatného testování nemocí v případech znásilnění;
(j) providing free testing for diseases in cases of rape;
(k) zajištěním, že se všem pachatelům násilí dostane odborné pomoci a léčby;
(k) ensuring that all perpetrators of violence receive professional help and treatment;
(l) poskytnutím řádné ochrany pro imigranty, zejména svobodné matky a jejich děti, které často nemají přiměřené prostředky obrany nebo povědomí o dostupných možnostech, jak čelit domácímu násilí v členských státech;
(l) providing proper protection for immigrants, especially single mothers and their children, who often do not have adequate means of defence or knowledge of available resources to counter domestic violence in Member States;
10. naléhavě žádá členské státy, aby mrzačení ženských genitálií označily za nezákonný násilný čin páchaný na ženách, který je porušováním jejich základních práv a je vážným útokem proti jejich fyzické integritě; bez ohledu na to, kde nebo v jaké zemi k tomuto činu na občanech nebo obyvatelích EU došlo, jedná se stále o nezákonný čin;
Urges Member States to define acts of female genital mutilation as an illegal act of violence against women, which constitutes a violation of their fundamental rights and a serious aggression against their physical integrity ; regardless of where or in which country this act occurs against EU citizens or residents, it remains illegal;
14. vyzývá členské státy, aby zajistily, že mrzačení genitálií bude při žádosti o azyl považováno za vážný argument k zajištění ochrany žadatele o azyl před nelidským zacházením;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that genital mutilation be considered a reasonable argument for an asylum claim in order to protect the asylum seeker from inhuman treatment;
18. lituje, že, pokud v této věci nezakročí orgány činné v trestním řízení, zůstávají výše zmíněná oznámení žen nezaznamenaná a statistiky jsou tudíž nedůvěryhodné a nespolehlivé;
Regrets that, as the above-mentioned reporting is usually left unrecorded when no action is taken by law enforcement authorities, the statistics remain untrustworthy and unreliable;
Men's violence against women is an extensive and complex problem.
Men's violence against women is an extensive and complex problem.
This report confines itself, primarily, to men's violence against women in close relationships within the EU.
This report confines itself, primarily, to men's violence against women in close relationships within the EU.
Initially, there is a need to answer a fundamental question.
Initially, there is a need to answer a fundamental question.
To what extent should political decisions concerning men's violence against women be taken at European level?
To what extent should political decisions concerning men's violence against women be taken at European level?
The point of departure for this report is that there are significant arguments in favour of a serious attempt also to find common guidelines and minimum requirements at European level as well.
The point of departure for this report is that there are significant arguments in favour of a serious attempt also to find common guidelines and minimum requirements at European level as well.
The most crucial argument is that men's violence against women is a violation of human rights.
The most crucial argument is that men's violence against women is a violation of human rights.
Above all, the violence typically perpetrated against women is not prosecuted as vigorously as the violence typically perpetrated against men.
Above all, the violence typically perpetrated against women is not prosecuted as vigorously as the violence typically perpetrated against men.
A common requirement of all Member States of the EU is that they must fulfil the fundamental criteria applying under the rule of law.
A common requirement of all Member States of the EU is that they must fulfil the fundamental criteria applying under the rule of law.
Obviously, violence has no place in a civilised society.
Obviously, violence has no place in a civilised society.
Naturally there are national and regional differences in laws and case-law within the EU but, for example, a country which does not consider murder to be a criminal offence could not become a member.
Naturally there are national and regional differences in laws and case-law within the EU but, for example, a country which does not consider murder to be a criminal offence could not become a member.
One of the most important tasks under the rule of law is precisely to protect citizens' lives and health against violence.
One of the most important tasks under the rule of law is precisely to protect citizens' lives and health against violence.
This fundamental idea was introduced in 1690 by the British philosopher John Locke in his classic work 'Two Treatises on Government'.
This fundamental idea was introduced in 1690 by the British philosopher John Locke in his classic work 'Two Treatises on Government'.
A government should be regarded as a tool for the defence of fundamental rights, the most fundamental civil right being the right to life and physical safety.
A government should be regarded as a tool for the defence of fundamental rights, the most fundamental civil right being the right to life and physical safety.
This is the moral, normative basis for the State and, hence, its raison d'être.
This is the moral, normative basis for the State and, hence, its raison d'être.
Citizens confer their right to legislate and rule on the State but this presupposes in turn that the State fulfils its basic commitment, i.e. to protect the lives, freedom and property of its citizens.
Citizens confer their right to legislate and rule on the State but this presupposes in turn that the State fulfils its basic commitment, i.e. to protect the lives, freedom and property of its citizens.
Any State which fails in this task has broken the contract.
Any State which fails in this task has broken the contract.
On the basis of that principle, it can be shown that men's violence against women is a challenge to the contract of which all common policy is an expression.
On the basis of that principle, it can be shown that men's violence against women is a challenge to the contract of which all common policy is an expression.
All violence is a challenge to our civilisation, to the rule of law, regardless of victim or perpetrator.
All violence is a challenge to our civilisation, to the rule of law, regardless of victim or perpetrator.
The fundamental point in this context, however, is that, in the EU, there is a systematic discrepancy between how crimes of violence are treated and punished depending on the gender of the victim.
The fundamental point in this context, however, is that, in the EU, there is a systematic discrepancy between how crimes of violence are treated and punished depending on the gender of the victim.
The violence to which men are typically subjected occurs in a public environment and is perpetrated by a male acquaintance or stranger, whereas women are subjected to violence in a private environment where the perpetrator is a man known to the victim, very often a man with whom the women has, or has had, a sexual relationship.
The violence to which men are typically subjected occurs in a public environment and is perpetrated by a male acquaintance or stranger, whereas women are subjected to violence in a private environment where the perpetrator is a man known to the victim, very often a man with whom the women has, or has had, a sexual relationship.
It does occur that women batter men in close relationships but the overwhelming proportion of violence in these contexts has a male perpetrator and a female victim.
It does occur that women batter men in close relationships but the overwhelming proportion of violence in these contexts has a male perpetrator and a female victim.
The most crucial difference politically is that private violence against women is not prosecuted as vigorously or seriously as public violence against men.
The most crucial difference politically is that private violence against women is not prosecuted as vigorously or seriously as public violence against men.
While violence in the street or other public environments - which primarily affects men - has been a criminal offence for centuries, it is relatively recent that violence occurring in the home and in private life - which primarily affects women - has also been made a criminal offence.
While violence in the street or other public environments - which primarily affects men - has been a criminal offence for centuries, it is relatively recent that violence occurring in the home and in private life - which primarily affects women - has also been made a criminal offence.
Well into the 20th century, Europe had laws which in various ways excused domestic violence by men against women and children.
Well into the 20th century, Europe had laws which in various ways excused domestic violence by men against women and children.
In many Member States, for example, men's violence against women in the home was not a crime subject to public prosecution until the later decades of the 20th century, in some countries as late as the 1990s.
In many Member States, for example, men's violence against women in the home was not a crime subject to public prosecution until the later decades of the 20th century, in some countries as late as the 1990s.
The remnants of this historical legacy live on in the EU; we can see it in case- law, attitudes and perceptions about the less serious nature of private violence.
The remnants of this historical legacy live on in the EU; we can see it in case- law, attitudes and perceptions about the less serious nature of private violence.
However, towards the end of the 1990s, views of the violence to which women are subjected began to change.
However, towards the end of the 1990s, views of the violence to which women are subjected began to change.
The seminal document was The Declaration on the elimination of violence against women adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1993.
The seminal document was The Declaration on the elimination of violence against women adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1993.
This was the first time that a UN document had put men's violence against women in a gender power perspective; it explicitly links violence to the superior position of men and the subordinate position of women.
This was the first time that a UN document had put men's violence against women in a gender power perspective; it explicitly links violence to the superior position of men and the subordinate position of women.
From this point of view, the violence is a result of, and a way of maintaining men's position of power:
From this point of view, the violence is a result of, and a way of maintaining men's position of power:
Violence against women is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between men and women, which have led to domination over and discrimination against women by men and to the prevention of the full advancement of women, and that violence against women is one of the crucial social mechanisms by which women are forced into a subordinate position compared with men (United Nations 1993).
Violence against women is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between men and women , which have led to domination over and discrimination against women by men and to the prevention of the full advancement of women, and that violence against women is one of the crucial social mechanisms by which women are forced into a subordinate position compared with men (United Nations 1993).
Violence against women is not simply confined to physical violence, and the separation between private and public has disappeared.
Violence against women is not simply confined to physical violence, and the separation between private and public has disappeared.
Unfortunately, this division is still far too typical of how we deal with the issue of men's violence against women in practice, particularly the perception that the State should not interfere in the private lives of its citizens.
Unfortunately, this division is still far too typical of how we deal with the issue of men's violence against women in practice, particularly the perception that the State should not interfere in the private lives of its citizens.
This notion has also been instrumental in the law enforcement agencies' systematic failings in prosecuting men's violence against women.
This notion has also been instrumental in the law enforcement agencies' systematic failings in prosecuting men's violence against women.
This discrimination is a violation of fundamental democratic and human rights, which is a serious matter in its own right.
This discrimination is a violation of fundamental democratic and human rights, which is a serious matter in its own right.
The extent of men's violence against women is also a major social problem.
The extent of men's violence against women is also a major social problem.
There are as yet no reliable studies showing exactly how great the problem is at EU level but the three national prevalence studies carried out in Finland in 1999, Sweden in 2001 and Germany in 2004 indicate that previous assessments have vastly underestimated the extent of the problem.
There are as yet no reliable studies showing exactly how great the problem is at EU level but the three national prevalence studies carried out in Finland in 1999, Sweden in 2001 and Germany in 2004 indicate that previous assessments have vastly underestimated the extent of the problem.
Using the UN's definition of violence against women as their point of reference, these studies show that 40 - 50% of women in these three countries have at some point in their lives been subjected to violence by a man.
Using the UN's definition of violence against women as their point of reference, these studies show that 40 - 50% of women in these three countries have at some point in their lives been subjected to violence by a man.