natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Mr Bossi is charged with the offences set out in Articles 110, 337 and 339 of the Criminal Code, in that each of them, acting in complicity and with each other’s moral support and material assistance and that of other, unidentified persons, thereby reinforcing each others' criminal intentions and engendering the material conditions for the offence to be committed, used violence against, and threatened, officers of the state police, namely the Verona and Milan general investigations and special operations division (DIGOS ) and the Milan general crime prevention office, who were conducting a search of the premises of the Milan headquarters of the Lega Nord, ordered by the Verona Public Prosecutor, in Milan on 18 September 1996.
Mr Bossi is charged with the offences set out in Articles 110, 337 and 339 of the Criminal Code, in that each of them, acting in complicity and with each other’s moral support and material assistance and that of other, unidentified persons, thereby reinforcing each others' criminal intentions and engendering the material conditions for the offence to be committed, used violence against, and threatened, officers of the state police, namely the Verona and Milan general investigations and special operations division (DIGOS ) and the Milan general crime prevention office, who were conducting a search of the premises of the Milan headquarters of the Lega Nord, ordered by the Verona Public Prosecutor, in Milan on 18 September 1996.
In the course of that police operation, inter alia, the officers were pushed, pulled, kicked and punched.
In the course of that police operation, inter alia, the officers were pushed, pulled, kicked and punched.
Some of them were also injured.
Some of them were also injured.
In particular Mr Bossi violently tugged an Inspector's uniform, tearing off his jacket and tunic.
In particular Mr Bossi violently tugged an Inspector's uniform, tearing off his jacket and tunic.
He also insulted, with other people, the officers of the state police in the course of the search referred to above under (A), railing against them as ‘fascists’, ‘mafiosi’, ‘Pinochet’.
He also insulted, with other people, the officers of the state police in the course of the search referred to above under (A), railing against them as ‘fascists’, ‘mafiosi’, ‘Pinochet’.
At that time Mr Bossi was member of the Italian Parliament.
At that time Mr Bossi was member of the Italian Parliament.
After a first decision, taken by the Chamber of Deputies (on 16 March 1999), that the facts at issue in the criminal proceedings pending before the Magistrate's Court in Milan, were covered by Italian parliamentary privilege, the Constitutional Court, as the outcome of a conflict of powers, between the Parliament and the Court of Appeal of Milan, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the Constitution, annulled that decision finding that insults and acts of resistance and violence are in no way acts to which parliamentary privilege may apply
After a first decision, taken by the Chamber of Deputies (on 16 March 1999), that the facts at issue in the criminal proceedings pending before the Magistrate's Court in Milan, were covered by Italian parliamentary privilege, the Constitutional Court, as the outcome of a conflict of powers, between the Parliament and the Court of Appeal of Milan, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the Constitution, annulled that decision finding that insults and acts of resistance and violence are in no way acts to which parliamentary privilege may apply
Under the PPI, Members of Parliament are protected from any legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or cast in the performance of their duties (Article 9) and they enjoy immunity during the sessions of the European Parliament under the conditions laid down in Article 10.
Under the PPI, Members of Parliament are protected from any legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or cast in the performance of their duties (Article 9) and they enjoy immunity during the sessions of the European Parliament under the conditions laid down in Article 10.
In the present case only Article 10 a) can be applied:
In the present case only Article 10 a) can be applied:
‘During the sessions of the European Parliament, its members shall enjoy:
‘During the sessions of the European Parliament, its members shall enjoy:
(a) in the territory of their own Member State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament.
(a) in the territory of their own Member State , the immunities accorded to members of their parliament.
Article 10 remits to national law and therefore to national immunity arrangements in Italy.
Article 10 remits to national law and therefore to national immunity arrangements in Italy.
Article 68, first paragraph, of the Italian Constitution provides for uncensurabiliy of Members of Parliament, who may not be called to answer opinions expressed and votes cast in the performance of their duties.
Article 68, first paragraph, of the Italian Constitution provides for uncensurabiliy of Members of Parliament, who may not be called to answer opinions expressed and votes cast in the performance of their duties.
Inviolability is established in the second and third paragraphs of Article 68 of the Constitution.
Inviolability is established in the second and third paragraphs of Article 68 of the Constitution.
In the case in point the second paragraph of article 68 shall be applied: " Without authorization from the House to which they belong, no member of Parliament may be subjected to a personal search or have their domicile searched, neither may they be arrested or otherwise deprived of personal freedom, or kept in detention, except to enforce a final conviction, or if caught in the act of committing a crime for which arrest is mandatory ".
In the case in point the second paragraph of article 68 shall be applied: " Without authorization from the House to which they belong, no member of Parliament may be subjected to a personal search or have their domicile searched, neither may they be arrested or otherwise deprived of personal freedom, or kept in detention, except to enforce a final conviction, or if caught in the act of committing a crime for which arrest is mandatory ".
The Committee on Legal Affairs considers that it appears that Members of the Italian Parliament do not enjoy Parliamentary immunity in respect of legal proceedings in such circumstances.
The Committee on Legal Affairs considers that it appears that Members of the Italian Parliament do not enjoy Parliamentary immunity in respect of legal proceedings in such circumstances.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after consideration the reasons for and against defending the Member's immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not defend the Parliamentary immunity of Mr Umberto Bossi.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 7(2) of the Rules of Procedure, after consideration the reasons for and against defending the Member's immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not defend the Parliamentary immunity of Mr Umberto Bossi.
Žádost o zachování poslanecké imunity a výsad Umberta Bossiho
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Umberto Bossi
Právní zástupce pana Umberta Bossiho 7.5.2004 22.7.2004
Barrister acting for Mr Umberto Bossi 7.5.2004 22.7.2004
JURI 22.7.2004
JURI 22.7.2004
8 5
8 5
12 1
12 1
k návrhu nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o právu použitelném pro mimosmluvní závazky („Řím II“)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("Rome II")
PE 349.977v04-00
PE 349.977v04-00
Symboly označující jednotlivé postupy
Symbols for procedures
* Konzultace prostá většina hlasujících
* Consultation procedure majority of the votes cast
**I Postup spolupráce (první čtení) prostá většina hlasujících
**I Cooperation procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
**II Postup spolupráce (druhé čtení) prostá většina hlasujících poslanců Parlamentu ke schválení společného stanoviska, prostá většina poslanců Parlamentu k zamítnutí či změně společného stanoviska
**II Cooperation procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
*** Postup souhlasu prostá většina poslanců Parlamentu, s výjimkou případů, na něž se vztahují ustanovení článků 105, 107, 161 a 300 Smlouvy o založení ES a článek 7 Smlouvy o založení EU
*** Assent procedure majority of Parliament’s component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
***I Postup spolurozhodování (první čtení) prostá většina hlasujících
***I Codecision procedure (first reading) majority of the votes cast
***II Postup spolurozhodování (druhé čtení) prostá většina hlasujících ke schválení společného stanoviska prostá většina poslanců Parlamentu k zamítnutí či změně společného stanoviska
***II Codecision procedure (second reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position majority of Parliament’s component Members, to reject or amend the common position
***III Postup spolurozhodování (třetí čtení) prostá většina hlasujících ke schválení společného textu
***III Codecision procedure (third reading) majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
Změny a doplnění legislativního textu
Amendments to a legislative text
Změny a doplnění přijaté Parlamentem jsou v textu zvýrazněny tučně kurzívou .
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
Text zvýrazněný prostou kurzívou je určen jednotlivým oddělením a označuje ty části právního předpisu, u nichž je navržena oprava, aby se usnadnilo vypracování konečného znění (například zjevné chyby či opomenutí v dané jazykové verzi).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
VYSVĚTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................35
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................3
STANOVISKO Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci 38
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 3
o návrhu nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o právu použitelném pro mimosmluvní závazky ("Řím II")
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("Rome II")
C ... / Dosud nezveřejněno v Úř. věst. ,
OJ C ... / Not yet published in OJ. ,
– s ohledem na zprávu Výboru pro právní záležitosti a stanovisko Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci ( A6-0211/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0211/2005 ),
Schvaluje návrh Komise ve znění pozměňovacích návrhů;
Approves the Commission proposal as amended;
Vyzývá Komisi, aby tento návrh Parlamentu opět předložila, pokud by jej hodlala podstatným způsobem změnit či doplnit, nebo nahradit jiným zněním;
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Pověřuje svého předsedu, aby stanovisko Parlamentu předal Radě a Komisi.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
(5) Působnost tohoto nařízení musí být určena tak, aby byla v souladu s nařízením (ES) č. 44/2001 a Římskou úmluvou z roku 1980.
(5) The scope of the Regulation must be determined in such a way as to be consistent with Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 and the Rome Convention of 1980 .
(5) Působnost a ustanovení tohoto nařízení musí být určena tak, aby byla v souladu s nařízením Rady (ES) č. 44/2001 ze dne 22. prosince 2000 o příslušnosti a uznávání a výkonu soudních rozhodnutí v občanských a obchodních věcech a nařízením (ES) č. ../... o právu použitelném pro smluvní závazky ("Řím I") .
(5) The scope and provisions of this Regulation must be determined in such a way as to be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and Regulation (EC) No ../... on the law applicable to contractual obligations (" Rome I") .
It is self-evident that the Regulation should be consistent not only with the 1980 Rome Convention, which will continue in being owing to the fact that Denmark is not participating in the adoption of the Regulation, but also with the new regulation which will emerge from the Rome I project.
It is self-evident that the Regulation should be consistent not only with the 1980 Rome Convention, which will continue in being owing to the fact that Denmark is not participating in the adoption of the Regulation, but also with the new regulation which will emerge from the Rome I project.
(5a) S ohledem na jednotnost komunitárního práva nesmí být tímto nařízením dotčena ustanovení, která se týkají rozhodného práva nebo ho ovlivňují, obsažená v nástrojích jiných sekundárních právních předpisů než je toto nařízení, jako jsou kolizní normy, nadřazené závazné předpisy Společenství a zvláštní zásady vnitřního trhu.
(5a) The concern for consistency in Community law requires that this Regulation be without prejudice to provisions relating to or having an effect on the applicable law, contained in instruments of secondary legislation other than this Regulation, such as conflict rules in specific matters, overriding mandatory rules of Community origin, and the basic legal principles of the internal market.
Ve výsledku by mělo toto nařízení podporovat řádné fungování vnitřního trhu, zejména volný pohyb zboží a služeb.
As a result, this Regulation should promote the proper functioning of the internal market, in particular the free movement of goods and services.
This amendment, which is based on the wording of the Commission's recital 19, should be read together with the amendment to Article 1 (Material scope, which should read "substantive scope").
This amendment, which is based on the wording of the Commission's recital 19, should be read together with the amendment to Article 1 (Material scope, which should read "substantive scope").
It is essential that the rules of this Regulation should not hamper the proper functioning of the Internal Market.
It is essential that the rules of this Regulation should not hamper the proper functioning of the Internal Market.
(7) Zásadu „ lex loci delicti commissi“ používají jako základní řešení pro mimosmluvní závazky téměř všechny členské státy, v praxi je však v případech, kdy jsou jednotlivé prvky daného případu rozděleny do několika zemí, uplatňována různě.
(7) The principle of the lex loci delicti commissi is the basic solution for non-contractual obligations in virtually all the Member States , but the practical application of the principle where the component factors of the case are spread over several countries is handled differently.
Takový postup vede k právní nejistotě.
This situation engenders uncertainty in the law.
(7) Je nezbytné stanovit kolizní normy, jež budou v rámci jednotlivých členských států co nejjednotnější, a budou tak minimalizovat právní nejistotu.
(7) It is necessary to have conflict rules which are as uniform as possible throughout the Member States in order to minimise uncertainty in the law.
Před nutností zajistit právní jistotu má však vždy přednost potřeba spravedlivého rozhodnutí v jednotlivých případech, soudy proto musí mít možnost uplatnit vlastní uvážení.
However, the need for legal certainty must always be subordinate to the overriding need to do justice in individual cases and consequently the courts must be able to exercise discretion.
Dále je třeba respektovat vůli stran tam, kde se výslovně vyjádřily k volbě práva rozhodného v daném občanskoprávním deliktu, nebo tam, kde takovou volbu může soud přiměřeně dovodit.
Furthermore, it is necessary to respect the intentions of the parties where they have made an express choice as to the law applicable to an issue in tort or delict or where such a choice may reasonably be inferred by the court.
Whereas to select the lex loci delicti commissi as the basic solution has its attractions, more flexibility needs to be built into the rules so as to allow the courts to do justice in individual cases.
Whereas to select the lex loci delicti commissi as the basic solution has its attractions, more flexibility needs to be built into the rules so as to allow the courts to do justice in individual cases.
Moreover, it is important to respect party autonomy.
Moreover, it is important to respect party autonomy.
(8) Jednotný předpis musí přispět ke zvýšení předvídatelnosti soudních rozhodnutí a zajistit rozumnou rovnováhu mezi zájmy odpovědné osoby a poškozeného.
(8) The uniform rule must serve to improve the foreseeability of court decisions and ensure a reasonable balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person who has sustained damage.
Odkaz na právo státu, kde vznikla přímá škoda (lex loci delicti commissi) zaručuje spravedlivou rovnováhu mezi zájmy odpovědné osoby a poškozeného, a odráží též moderní přístup k občanskoprávní odpovědnosti a vytváření systémů přísné odpovědnosti.
A connection with the country where the direct damage occurred ( lex loci delicti commissi ) strikes a fair balance between the interests of the person causing the damage and the person sustaining the damage, and also reflects the modern approach to civil liability and the development of systems of strict liability .
(8) Toto nařízení by mělo přispět ke zvýšení předvídatelnosti soudních rozhodnutí a zajistit rozumnou rovnováhu mezi zájmy odpovědné osoby a poškozeného.
(8) This Regulation should serve to improve the foreseeability of court decisions and ensure a reasonable balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person who has sustained damage.
Mělo by také splňovat přiměřená očekávání stran tím, že umožní soudům zvolit si přístup k otázce práva v daném sporu rozhodného, které splňuje požadavky mezinárodního obchodu a transakcí ve společenství států bez vnitřních hranic.
It should also satisfy the reasonable expectations of the parties by allowing courts to take an approach to the question of the law applicable in a given dispute which satisfies the needs of international trade and transactions in a Community of States without internal borders.
See the justification to the amendment to recital 7.
See the justification to the amendment to recital 7.
Moreover, it is uncertain what the "modern approach to civil liability"is.
Moreover, it is uncertain what the "modern approach to civil liability"is.
Also it is not felt that the reference to systems of strict liability is necessary.
Also it is not felt that the reference to systems of strict liability is necessary.
(8a) Kolizní normy stanovené v tomto nařízení se rovněž týkají závazků založených na přísné odpovědnosti a sladěné předpisy o spojujících faktorech se rovněž týkají otázky schopnosti vzít na sebe odpovědnost v daném občanskoprávním deliktu.
(8a) The conflict of laws rules set out in this Regulation also cover obligations based on strict liability and the harmonised rules on connecting factors also apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/ delict .
It is also worth making it clear that the harmonised rules on connecting factors apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delect.
It is also worth making it clear that the harmonised rules on connecting factors apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delect.
(9) Je třeba stanovit zvláštní předpisy upravující určité občanskoprávní delikty, v jejichž případě nelze zajistit rozumnou rovnováhu mezi posuzovanými zájmy na základě obecného ustanovení.
(9) Specific rules should be laid down for special torts/ delicts where the general rule does not allow a reasonable balance to be struck between the interests at stake.
This recital is unnecessary in view of the new approach adopted herein.
This recital is unnecessary in view of the new approach adopted herein.
(10) Ve vztahu k odpovědnosti za výrobky musí kolizní normy splňovat cíle spravedlivého rozdělení rizik vyplývajících z moderní společnosti využívající vyspělé technologie, ochrany zdraví spotřebitelů, podpory modernizace, zabezpečení nezkreslené hospodářské soutěže a usnadnění obchodování.
(10) Regarding product liability, the conflict rule must meet the objectives of fairly spreading the risks inherent in a modern high-technology society, protecting consumers' health, stimulating innovation, securing undistorted competition and facilitating trade.
Spojení s právem státu, kde má poškozený trvalý pobyt, spolu s ustanovením týkajícím se předvídatelnosti soudních rozhodnutí představuje vyrovnané řešení ve vztahu k uvedeným cílům.
Connection to the law of the place where the person sustaining the damage has his habitual residence, together with a foreseeability clause, is a balanced solution in regard to these objectives.
It is considered that the general rules can cater perfectly well for product liability cases.
It is considered that the general rules can cater perfectly well for product liability cases.
(11) V případech nekalé konkurence musí kolizní norma zabezpečit ochranu soutěžitelů, spotřebitelů a široké veřejnosti a zajistit řádné fungování tržního hospodářství.
(11) In matters of unfair competition, the conflict rule must protect competitors, consumers and the general public and ensure that the market economy functions properly.
Spojení s právem platným pro příslušný trh splňuje z obecného hlediska uvedené cíle, přestože za určitých okolností mohou být vhodné jiné předpisy.
The connection to the law of the relevant market generally satisfies these objectives, though in specific circumstances other rules might be appropriate.
It is considered that the general rules can cater perfectly well for cases involving unfair competition.
It is considered that the general rules can cater perfectly well for cases involving unfair competition.
Moreover, it is uncertain what exactly is intended to be covered by "matters of unfair competition".
Moreover, it is uncertain what exactly is intended to be covered by "matters of unfair competition".
In the event that it should be regarded as imperative to have a special rule for "matters of unfair competition", a definition clause should be included.
In the event that it should be regarded as imperative to have a special rule for "matters of unfair competition", a definition clause should be included.
(12) Je třeba přijmout zvláštní ustanovení platná pro případy porušení soukromí a osobnostních práv, především vzhledem k vlivu médií ve společnosti a potřebě zohlednit precedenční právo Evropského soudního dvora 1 .
(12) A specific rule is needed for violations of privacy and rights relating to the personality owing in particular to the role played by the media in society and in order to take account of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities 1 .
Konkrétně je možné předpokládat, že existuje zjevně užší vztah k určitému státu, s ohledem na faktory jako je země, pro niž je zveřejněný materiál či vysílání zejména určeno, jazyk takového zveřejněného materiálu či vysílání, podíl tržby nebo počtu čtenářů či posluchačů v daném státě na celkovém objemu tržeb či počtu čtenářů či posluchačů.
In particular, a manifestly closer connection with a particular country may be deemed to exist, having regard to factors such as the country to which a publication or broadcast is principally directed or the language of the publication or broadcast or sales or audience size in a given country as a proportion of total sales or audience size.
Obdobné úvahy by měly platit též ve vztahu k materiálům zveřejňovaným na internetu.
Similar considerations should apply in respect of Internet publication.