natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jan Andersson, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Emine Bozkurt, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Richard Falbr, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Kathy Sinnott, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker, Gabriele Zimmer
Jan Andersson, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Emine Bozkurt, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Richard Falbr, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Sepp Kusstatscher, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Kathy Sinnott, Jean Spautz, Anne Van Lancker, Gabriele Zimmer
PE 362.756v03-00
PE 362.756v03-00
VYSVÉTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ..............................................................................................12
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................12
STANOVISKO Výboru pro zahraniční věci ..........................................................107
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...............................................105
STANOVISKO Výboru pro rozvoj .............................................................................112
OPINION of the Committee on Development .....................................................110
STANOVISKO Výboru pro mezinárodní obchod ...............................................116
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ....................................114
STANOVISKO Výboru pro rozpočtovou kontrolu ........................................121
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ......................................119
STANOVISKO Hospodářského a měnového výboru .......................................125
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ..........123
STANOVISKO Výboru pro zaměstnanost a sociální věci ...........................130
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ............128
STANOVISKO Výboru pro životní prostředí, veřejné zdraví a bezpečnost potravin 133
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY 131
STANOVISKO Výboru pro průmysl, výzkum a energetiku ..........................139
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ..............137
STANOVISKO VÝBORU PRO VNITŔNÍ TRH A OCHRANU SPOTŔEBITELŮ..............144
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION 142
STANOVISKO Výboru pro dopravu a cestovní ruch .....................................151
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM..............................149
STANOVISKO Výboru pro regionální rozvoj ....................................................157
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ................................155
STANOVISKO Výboru pro zemědělství a rozvoj venkova ..........................167
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT..165
STANOVISKO Výboru pro rybolov .........................................................................171
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ..............................................................169
STANOVISKO Výboru pro kulturu a vzdělávání ............................................175
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ..............................173
STANOVISKO Výboru pro občanské svobody, spravedlnost a vnitřní věci 183
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 182
STANOVISKO Výboru pro ústavní záležitosti ..................................................186
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ..............................185
STANOVISKO Výboru pro práva žen a rovnost pohlaví .............................189
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ..188
–...rozhodnutí přijatá Rozpočtovým výborem na schůzích dne 4. - 6. října 2005 o předlohách změn a pozměňovacích návrzích k oddílu III návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu
- Decisions taken by the Committee on Budgets at its meetings of 4-6 October 2005 on the draft amendments/proposed modifications to Section III of the draft general budget
část 2 – A6‑0309/2005
Part 2 - A6-0309/2005
o návrhu souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, oddíl III – Komise (C6-0299 – 2005/2001(BUD) )
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, Section III – Commission (C6‑0299 – 2005/2001(BUD) )
L 248, 16.9.2002, s.1
OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.1. ,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 13. dubna 2005 o pokynech pro rozpočtový proces na rok 2006
– having regard to its resolution of 13 April 2005 on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy report (APS)
Texty přijaté tohoto dne, P6_TA(2005)0126 . ,
Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2005)0126 . ,
– s ohledem na své usnesení ze dne 6. července 2005 o mandátu pro dohodovací řízení týkající se rozpočtu na rok 2006 před prvním čtením v Radě
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the mandate for the 2006 budget conciliation procedure before the Council's first reading
Texty přijaté tohoto dne, P6_TA(2005)0286 . ,
Texts Adopted of that date, P6_TA(2005)0286 . ,
– s ohledem na předběžný návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, který předložila Komise dne 15. června 2005 ( KOM(2005)0300 ),
– having regard to the preliminary draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Commission presented on 15 June 2005 ( COM(2005)0300 ),
– s ohledem na návrh souhrnného rozpočtu Evropské unie na rozpočtový rok 2006, který sestavila Rada dne 15. července 2005 ( C6‑0299/2005 ),
– having regard to the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2006, which the Council established on 15 July 2005 ( C6-0299/2005 ),
– s ohledem na zprávu Rozpočtového výboru a stanoviska ostatních dotčených výborů ( A6‑0309/2005 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the other committees concerned ( A6‑0309/2005 ),
Obecné úvahy a priority
General considerations and priorities
3. zastává stejné stanovisko, pokud jde o položky plateb, a považuje 111, 4 mld. EUR schválených Radou (1,01 % hrubého národního důchodu) za nedostačující pro účinné provádění již schválených politik i nezbytných nových akcí; rozhodl proto o zvýšení plateb v rozpočtu na úroveň 115,4 miliardy EUR (1,04 % HND); zdůrazňuje, že toto rozhodnutí je v souladu s rozpočtovou kázní související s hospodářskými problémy, s nimiž se potýkají některé členské státy;
Takes the same view as regards payment appropriations and considers the Council's adopted level of EUR 111,4 billion (1,01 % of GNI) as inadequate for the effective implementation of policies already agreed as well as of necessary new actions; has therefore decided to increase payments across the budget to a level of EUR 115,4 billion (1,04 % of GNI); underlines that this is still in line with budgetary rigour relative to the economic problems facing certain Member States;
Okruh 1
Heading 1
7. zdůrazňuje význam inovace a obnovy v rámci reformované zemědělské politiky EU, zejména v oblasti odborného školení a opatření zaměřených na podporu mladých zemědělců;
Underlines the importance of innovation and renewal within the reformed agricultural policy of the EU, especially in the field of training and measures for young farmers;
Okruh 2
Heading 2
10. trvá na tom,aby program PEACE pro Severní Irsko i nadále dostával podporu, ale připomíná, že částka, která má být převedena z „inovativních opatření“, byla společně dohodnuta Parlamentem a Radou za přítomnosti Komise na dohodovacím jednání o rozpočtu dne 25. listopadu 2004; rozhodl se proto vrátit se k této úrovni a žádá Radu, aby schválila řešení v rámci veškerých opatření, s nimiž počítá interinstitucionální dohoda, kterým se vyřeší financování zbývajících 12 milionů EUR pro program PEACE;
Insists that the PEACE programme for Northern Ireland continue to receive support but recalls that the amount to be re-deployed from "innovative measures" was jointly agreed between the Parliament and the Council, in the presence of the Commission, at the budget conciliation of 25 November 2004; has therefore decided to reinstate this level and invites the Council to agree a solution, within the framework of all means foreseen in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999, to solve the financing of the remaining EUR 12 million for PEACE;
Okruh 3
Heading 3
14. domnívá se, že prostředky na informační politiku EU neodpovídají potřebám, a rozhodl se zvýšit tuto částku; zdůrazňuje, že je nutně třeba, aby Komise předložila urychleně Bílou knihu o informační politice; rozhodl o tom, že mezitím má být část prostředků zapsána do rezervy;
Considers that the amounts foreseen for the EU Information Policy are inadequate and has decided to increase this amount; emphasises the urgent need for the Commission to put forward its White Paper on Information Policy; in the meantime decides to enter part of the appropriations in reserve;
Okruh 4
Heading 4
23. odmítá krok Rady, která zvýšila počet zvláštních zástupců v rámci SZBP o dva bez příslušných konzultací s Evropským parlamentem; poznamenává, že na základě společného prohlášení ze dne 25. listopadu 2002 dosáhlo irské a nizozemské předsednictví zásadního pokroku, pokud jde o vytvoření politického informačního a konzultačního kruhu s Parlamentem; lituje skutečnosti, že i když by se tato setkání měla konat během roku asi pětkrát, letos se (do září 2005) konalo pouze jedno setkání; Parlament proto trvá na tom, aby tento politický dialog pokračoval tak, jak se oba orgány dohodly, a kvalitativně se zlepšil;
Rejects the Council's increase for two additional Special Representatives in the field of CFSP without the requisite consultation of the European Parliament; notes that on the basis of the joint declaration of 25 November 2002, the Irish and Dutch presidencies have achieved a substantive progress in establishing a political information and consultation circle with Parliament; deplores that although such meetings should take place about five times throughout a year, only one meeting has taken place this year (until September 2005); therefore, Parliament insists this political dialogue to continue as agreed between both institutions and to be qualitatively improved;
Okruh 5
Heading 5
• vysvětlí situaci ohledně přijímání pracovníků a ohledně možností zaplnit nová pracovní místa vytvořená v souvislosti s rozšířením;
• clarifies the situation relating to the recruitment and the possibilities to fulfil the enlargement posts;
• bude provedeno úplné přezkoumání všech zbývajících navržených nařízení (včetně nařízení z legislativního a pracovního plánu na rok 2005) s cílem zajistit, aby stávající a plánované legislativní návrhy Komise splňovaly kritéria posilování konkurenceschopnosti, dodržování zásady subsidiarity a snižování byrokracie a nákladů na provádění předpisů; požaduje provést tuto analýzu do 15. listopadu 2005;
• provides a complete review of all outstanding regulations proposed (including those of the 2005 legislative and work programme) to ensure that all existing and planned legislative proposals from the Commission meet inter alia the criteria of subsidiarity and reducing bureaucracy and implementation costs; requests this analysis by November 2005;
• bude uzavřena dohoda mezi Parlamentem a Komisí o legislativním a pracovním plánu na rok 2006;
• concludes an agreement with the European Parliament on the 2006 legislative and work programme;
• budou poskytnuty podrobné informace o víceletém plánování veškerých legislativních návrhů týkajících se budoucího finančního rámce;
• provides details of multi-annual programming for all legislative proposals over the next financial framework;
• výslovně se zaváže, že bude dodržovat společné prohlášení o finančním plánování přijaté při dohodovacím řízení dne 13. července 2004 a že předloží příslušné informace a údaje Parlamentu;
• commits itself clearly to respect the joint statement on financial programming, agreed during the conciliation of 13 July 2004, and to submit the relevant information and data to the Parliament;
• zaváže se, že ještě před druhým čtením předloží návrh na zavedení zaměstnanecké politiky, služebního postupu a osvědčených postupů pro agentury;
• commits itself, before the second reading, to present a proposal to set up a staff policy, career profile and best practices for the Agencies;
• předloží svou bílou knihu o budoucí informační a komunikační strategii;
• presents its White Paper on its future information and communication strategy;
• předloží návrh na revizi prováděcích pravidel k finančnímu nařízení do 31. října 2005;
• submits the proposal on the revision of the implementing rules of the Financial Regulation by 31 October 2005;
• předloží zvláštní nástroj pro lidská práva, který Parlament požadoval ve svém usnesení ze dne 8. června 2005 o politických výzvách a rozpočtových prostředcích rozšířené Unie v letech 2007-2013;
• presents a separate instrument for human rights, as requested by the Parliament in its resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013
Okruh 7
Heading 7
Horizontální témata
Horizontal issues
33. poznamenává, že je řada úspěšných kulturních organizací, např. Orchestr mládeže Evropské unie, Barokní orchestr Evropské unie, Mezinárodní nadace Yehudiho Menuhina aj., které Evropský parlament po mnoho let podporoval formou grantů; zdůrazňuje, že se očekává, že tyto organizace budou pokračovat ve své činnosti v rámci nového víceletého finančního rámce pro období od roku 2007; se znepokojením zjišťuje, že je reálné nebezpečí, že tyto organizace nebudou schopny dále působit v roce 2006 bez poskytnutí přechodné podpory k překlenutí proluky mezi dvěma obdobími finančního plánování; Parlament si proto přeje dohodnout se s Radou na dostatečné výši finančních prostředků k financování priorit za objektivních okolností a v dlouhodobém výhledu, a to použitím ustanovení interinstitucionální dohody ze dne 6. května 1999, zejména článků 33 a 34 této dohody, nebo uplatněním ustanovení článku 272 Smlouvy o ES;
Notes that there are a number of successful cultural organisations such as European Union Youth Orchestra, the European Union Baroque Orchestra, the International Yehudi Menuhin Foundation, a.o. which the European Parliament has supported through grants over many years; underlines that it is expected that these organisations will continue their activities in the context of a new multiannual financial framework as from 2007 onwards; notes with concern that there is a real danger that these organisations will not be able to continue their activities in 2006 without the provisions of transitional aid to ensure a bridge between the two financial planning periods; therefore, Parliament is willing to agree with the Council on sufficient funding to finance these priority actions under such objective and long term circumstances, through the use of the provision of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 in particular article 33 and 34 thereof or through the application of the Treaty provision of article 272 TE;
Pilotní projekty, přípravné akce a studie
Pilot Projects, Preparatory Actions and Studies
37. zdůrazňuje, že Komise musí zajistit, aby při plnění rozpočtu byla rovnost pohlaví brána v úvahu, aby jakákoli akce byla posuzována z pohledu různosti jejích dopadů na muže a ženy;
Stresses that the Commission must ensure that gender equality is taken into account in the implementation of the budget and that any action should be evaluated from the perspective of the difference of its impact as between men and women;
VYSVÉTLUJÍCÍ PROHLÁŠENÍ
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
On the Lisbon strategy
On the Lisbon strategy
At the adoption of the 2006 PDB it was said that the EU must invest in a knowledge-based economy to put the European economy back on track.
At the adoption of the 2006 PDB it was said that the EU must invest in a knowledge-based economy to put the European economy back on track.
The goals of prosperity and solidarity would underpin the re-launching of the Lisbon Strategy.
The goals of prosperity and solidarity would underpin the re-launching of the Lisbon Strategy.
The adoption of the PDB had also been preceded by the Parliament resolution on the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy of 9 March 2005, the European Council conclusions on re-launching the Lisbon Strategy of 29 March and the Parliament resolution on the Annual Policy Strategy.
The adoption of the PDB had also been preceded by the Parliament resolution on the mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy of 9 March 2005, the European Council conclusions on re-launching the Lisbon Strategy of 29 March and the Parliament resolution on the Annual Policy Strategy.
All of these contained political guidelines for the Lisbon re-launch.
All of these contained political guidelines for the Lisbon re-launch.
In total, the rapporteur notes that the Commission's PDB figure of EUR 40 billion for the Lisbon Strategy was made up of (all amounts rounded):
In total, the rapporteur notes that the Commission's PDB figure of EUR 40 billion for the Lisbon Strategy was made up of (all amounts rounded):
Rural development
Rural development
7 800
7 800
Internal Polices
Internal Polices
8 000
8 000
out of which
out of which
(approximate figures)
(approximate figures)
5 285
5 285
Information Society
Information Society
40 285
40 285
The rapporteur would stress the fact that these actions are spread out over the budget and it is in fact not possible to get such a direct overview from the PDB itself.
The rapporteur would stress the fact that these actions are spread out over the budget and it is in fact not possible to get such a direct overview from the PDB itself.
This information was also compiled from the press statements and other additional information given by the Commission.
This information was also compiled from the press statements and other additional information given by the Commission.
Naturally, these figures were/are highly dependent on subjective choices as to what can and should be included in the Lisbon Agenda and must be treated with caution.
Naturally, these figures were/are highly dependent on subjective choices as to what can and should be included in the Lisbon Agenda and must be treated with caution.
Under the internal policies (heading 3), the 6th research framework programme constitutes the main element.
Under the internal policies (heading 3), the 6th research framework programme constitutes the main element.
The whole of this area is counted as a Lisbon "element" for an amount of some EUR 5.285 billion in the PDB.
The whole of this area is counted as a Lisbon "element" for an amount of some EUR 5.285 billion in the PDB.
The figure for payments amount to EUR 5.048 billion.
The figure for payments amount to EUR 5.048 billion.
The amount for commitments in the PDB naturally makes up the final amounts to arrive at the global amounts co-decided for the whole period of the framework programme.
The amount for commitments in the PDB naturally makes up the final amounts to arrive at the global amounts co-decided for the whole period of the framework programme.
What seems contradictory to the focus on the Lisbon strategy is that the Council has introduced reductions of some EUR 429 million in payments.
What seems contradictory to the focus on the Lisbon strategy is that the Council has introduced reductions of some EUR 429 million in payments.
Although the Council Presidency always state that this level is still significantly higher than the 2005 payment level, it constitutes a serious reduction in the Commission's planned payments rhythm and implementation.
Although the Council Presidency always state that this level is still significantly higher than the 2005 payment level, it constitutes a serious reduction in the Commission's planned payments rhythm and implementation.
Trans-European networks (TENs) are counting towards the overall Lisbon figure in the PDB for an amount of some EUR 700 million.
Trans-European networks (TENs) are counting towards the overall Lisbon figure in the PDB for an amount of some EUR 700 million.
This would largely correspond to budget lines 06 03 01 (main TEN line on transport networks) and 06 03 02 (energy networks).
This would largely correspond to budget lines 06 03 01 (main TEN line on transport networks) and 06 03 02 (energy networks).
In this case, the Council has maintained the PDB.
In this case, the Council has maintained the PDB.
There is a modest increase for transport networks (+ 20 million to a total of 692 million) whereas the energy networks remain at 2005 level with 21.5 million.
There is a modest increase for transport networks (+ 20 million to a total of 692 million) whereas the energy networks remain at 2005 level with 21.5 million.
Linked to the idea of a knowledge-based economy, education and vocational training are counted for an amount of EUR 650 million according to the Commission.
Linked to the idea of a knowledge-based economy, education and vocational training are counted for an amount of EUR 650 million according to the Commission.
This essentially corresponds to all education and training measures under policy area 15, Education and Culture, including the Leonardo and Socrates programmes .
This essentially corresponds to all education and training measures under policy area 15, Education and Culture, including the Leonardo and Socrates programmes .
There is no increase for Socrates in the PDB and Leonardo is even decreased by 10 million.
There is no increase for Socrates in the PDB and Leonardo is even decreased by 10 million.
The Council have maintained the Commission figures.
The Council have maintained the Commission figures.
If this is part of the Lisbon strategy, why is it stagnating?
If this is part of the Lisbon strategy, why is it stagnating?
The rapporteur thought the Lisbon strategy should be reinforced.
The rapporteur thought the Lisbon strategy should be reinforced.
In the area of education and culture, the rapporteur has already before highlighted the serious contradiction of arguing for a knowledge based society with great aspirations for the future, while at the same time reducing appropriations for youth.
In the area of education and culture, the rapporteur has already before highlighted the serious contradiction of arguing for a knowledge based society with great aspirations for the future, while at the same time reducing appropriations for youth.
What could be the purpose of a Lisbon strategy if it is not sustainable for future generations and include a strengthened focus on the young people of Europe?
What could be the purpose of a Lisbon strategy if it is not sustainable for future generations and include a strengthened focus on the young people of Europe?
The Commission has counted actions for SMEs up to an amount of some EUR 100 million.
The Commission has counted actions for SMEs up to an amount of some EUR 100 million.
The rapporteur refers to his initial analysis in the global working document on the PDB where it is noted that financing for Parliament's SME actions are actually reduced compared to 2005.
The rapporteur refers to his initial analysis in the global working document on the PDB where it is noted that financing for Parliament's SME actions are actually reduced compared to 2005.
The Council has maintained the Commision's restrictive approach.
The Council has maintained the Commision's restrictive approach.
As an illustration of this situation, see annex one the state of play for a few of the SME lines.
As an illustration of this situation, see annex one the state of play for a few of the SME lines.
The rapporteur would like to reinforce the actions to facilitate for SMEs.
The rapporteur would like to reinforce the actions to facilitate for SMEs.