natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· Zvyšování multifunkčnosti evropského zemědělství EU a posilování udržitelnosti živobytí na venkově
· Boosting the multi-functionality of European agriculture and enhancing the sustainability of rural livelihoods
· Zlepšování komunikace s využitím místních propojení
· Improving communication through local links
Prohlubování a rozvoj mnohojazyčnosti
· Enhancing and developing multi-lingualism
Voluntary technical assistance
Voluntary technical assistance
The actions run by the Council
Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)
The EU is a common project shared by all levels of government, all types of organisation and people from all walks of life.
The PDB margin shown is quite substantial at nearly 5% of total possible expenditure under the ceiling.
Institutions aim to bring the EU closer to the citizens.
The rapporteur has already drawn attention to the fact that this is due to an exceptional situation, as the full amount of EUR 200 million foreseen for the guarantee fund will not be needed in 2008 and has been added to the margin.
Therefore the coordination between the European institutions, in the field of communication and information policy, is necessary.
The rapporteur therefore recommends a certain amount of caution since this money (compulsory expenditure) will be needed again in 2009.
The cooperation between the Commission and European Parliament is operated at a centralised and decentralised level.
It seems clear that substantial additional amounts could be asked by the Commission for both Kosovo and Palestine .
At a centralised level, the only instrument that the Commission and the Parliament have for pooling their ideas in the field of better communication and joint actions is the Interinstitutional Group on Information.
This would be new and un-programmed expenditure that would come on top of the existing budget appropriations for these areas.
Nevertheless, the statute of the Interinstitutional Group on Information is still to be defined.
In any case, the rapporteur draws attention to the fact that such "new needs", which are not included in the PDB, could possibly amount to as much as EUR 300 million or thereabouts.
The European Parliament considers that the group should be predominantly political.
If the Commission should come forward with such requests, it would mean that the effective margin could be virtually zero.
The possibility of the creation of a second-level coordination group, implementing the guidelines laid down by the IGI, should be considered as recommended by the EP Resolution on the White Paper of the Commission
Obviously, if so financed, there would then be nothing left for any other priorities!
According to the Mission Statement of the European Parliament, the Information Offices of the European Parliament shall be responsible for delivery of DG Information's overall information and communication strategy in the Member States.
On average, this amounts to about EUR 250 million per year.
Its objectives are to inform the citizen , both directly and via the European, national, regional and specialist media outlets, of decisions taken by the Parliament and to promote and project the Parliament and its activities
The funding for 2007 was adopted at EUR 159, 2 million and, for 2008, the Commission had in its programming an amount of EUR 200 million.
DG Information, EP Mission Statement adopted on the 24th October 2005 by the Bureau .
The PDB should show an amount just over the 200m mark.
They play a triple role that consists of: Implementing the Commission's Communication strategy at a local level , providing relevant information about developments within the Commission , interface between the Commission and the political world and civil society in the Member States .
In the era of multi-annual frameworks and co-decision, it is true to say that the resources available are more or less fixed and, barring exceptional events (such as Iraq or the tsunami), the magnitude and general thrust of funding will normally be very similar to the previous year.
The global costs of Information Offices and Representations for 2007 are EUR 128 693 310 of with EUR 39 636 700 are foreseen for the EP Information Offices and EUR 89 056 610 for the Commission's Representations.
This is not necessarily a bad thing as the Budgets Committee normally defends the "traditional priorities" and, of course, lives by the MFF, but it does highlight the structural difficulty of making any really significant adjustments.
The improvement in communication and information policy can be achieved in a more coherent way within a global concept of communication for citizens.
The rapporteur notes that, in what has been the enfant terrible of financial headings over the period 2000-2006, the conflicting demands of, on the one hand, facing "new challenges" and crises and, on the other hand, respecting the traditional policies toward EU neighbours and partners further away, will, again, simply have to be looked at side-by-side.
This can only be realised on the basis of an analysis of the added value of each information tool
This is not a static equation and, luckily, it should have multiple solutions.
P6_TA(2007)0099, 29.03.2007 on the guidelines for the 2008 budget procedure .
The only problem is that some of these solutions might be painful, especially given the traditional attitude of the Council.
The information and communication strategy has improved over the past few years but more progress needs to be made in order to employ the available resources in the most efficient way possible
It should be noted that the budget structure of heading 4 is now largely "instruments-based" reflecting the agreements reached during last year for the legal bases (regulations) which, in several cases, were co-decided.
Some first reflections on a "Budget for results" in the field of information and communication policy could centre on the following points:
As can be seen in the table above, this does not really facilitate the immediate understanding of heading 4 as many people tend to be involved or interested in "regions and countries" rather than "instruments".
Of course, from a budgetary view synergies between the institutions in their communication and information efforts are welcome and sought after.
From a point of view of transparency and budget scrutiny, it was therefore decided to maintain some geographical splits at the level of budget chapters/lines in B2007.
The institutions should cooperate as closely as possible in order to cut overheads for decentralised structures, etc.
For example, there are different chapters/lines for Asia and Latin America, although most actions will be financed by the same legal Instrument.
The right balance needs to be achieved between the independence of each EU institution to carry out its own information and communication policy and (i) the extra budgetary costs of separate policies and (ii) possible confusion due to a multiplicity of messages and opinions.
In addition to the main political scrutiny of the PDB, the rapporteur may also look into the budget structure of the heading and propose some adjustments.
All actors involved in decision taking need to be aware that any new communication and information activity which has not been programmed yet by the European Commission will have to come from the margins existing in the current MFF 2007 - 2014 - and these margins are dwindling.
Essentially, this centred on the basic character of the legislation, i.e. should the legal instruments have the character of general frameworks and give a very large degree of implementing freedom to the Commission?
Ø Cost-effectiveness of modern information technologies
Or, should they have a higher degree of policy content co-decided by the Parliament.
Pilot Information Networks are one example, WebTV might be considered to be another.
The need for a certain degree of flexibility ("it is not possible to change the Regulation every time an adjustment is needed") came to be handled through renewed emphasis on concepts such as multi-annual "Strategy Papers" and, at the next lower level, "Annual Action Programmes".
In order to achieve the most results with the least means the message one would like to transmit should be adapted to different audiences, sectors or countries.
As the Budgets Committee played a key role, the rapporteur is keen to follow up on the Commission's commitments under this agreement.
There is a clear link between the medium through which a message is communicated and the level at which this occurs and, besides, local communication may not only be a lot cheaper but at least as efficient as centralised activities.
It could be interesting, in particular, to see how the Commission takes Parliament's comments on the strategy papers into account.
As Parliament has noted regularly in the past, efforts should be made to strengthen the extent to which communications policy can be delivered locally, i.e. in a manner that may be readily understood by the people of Europe in local terms.
Ultimately, it cannot be excluded that the budgetary procedure could be used to strengthen Parliament's position.
16 01 02
- European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI)
Exploitation des studios de radiodiffusion et de télévisions et équipements audiovisuels
Therefore, it has strongly opposed every attempt of setting up a legal basis
Facilité de performance pour la rubrique 3
Globally, administrative expenditure increased by 19,65% in commitment appropriations and decreased by 3,81% in payment appropriations between 2005-2007.
Budget Line
Budget line
Pracovní dokument o informační a komunikační politice: Rozpočtová hlediska
· better guarantees of the right to access to information on the projects and actions pertaining to shared management for the EU citizens
Obecným cílem, který orgány naplňují, je určení vhodné informační politiky zaměřené na evropské občany, jejímž prostřednictvím bude zvýšeno povědomí občanů o činnostech, strukturách a postupech rozhodování Evropské unie.
· more guarantees for sound use of EU funds allocated for information campaigns by the Member States
Akce na centrální úrovni jsou iniciované orgány Evropské unie a jsou určené bruselské veřejnosti a/nebo členským státům.
The European Parliament's communication is made up of a mosaic of different channels, which are complementary and share common goals which are to inform the EU citizen effectively on its activities and to contribute to European construction.
Na decentralizované úrovni je informační politika iniciovaná „Evropskými domy“, které se nacházejí v hlavních městech členských států, a jejich regionálními pobočkami.
Simultaneously with the Commission, the Parliament has initiated a process by considerably enlarging the scope of actions of its DG Information which was accompanied by a substantial increase of its budget to reach EUR 89 580 000 and 658 staff members in 2007.
V první části budou poskytnuty informace o rozpočtových prostředcích pro financování komunikační politiky na centrální úrovni, v druhé části pak informace týkající se spolupráce mezi orgány a rovněž informace o otázkách decentralizované úrovně.
This has resulted in the definition of a "strong and effective information strategy", a better use of the means available, the creation of a press officer in each of the European Parliament's Information offices for "going local" and the development of three major projects:
Zároveň byly upraveny cíle akcí tak, aby lépe odpovídaly potřebám, jež vyjádřila občanská společnost.
Communication policy is of course a key issue as regards the 2009 elections.
SEC(2005)0985 ze dne 20.7.2005. a „Příspěvku Komise k období pro úvahu a poté: Plán D pro demokracii, dialog a diskusi“
To that end, the Parliament has proposed an 18-month action programme to make EU citizens more aware of the European elections.
KOM(2005)0494 ze dne 13.10.2005. – Komise usilovala o to, aby byli občané EU lépe informováni o politikách EU a o dopadu těchto politik na občany; předložení Bílé knihy o evropské komunikační politice
An amount of EUR 10 300 000 is planned for 2008; a supplementary funding would be probably needed for 2009.
Uvedené dokumenty představují tři pilíře nové komunikační politiky Společenství, která byla zahájena v roce 2005.
The tables billow present the appropriations allocated to communication policy by the European Parliament.
Rozpočtová linie
21 Data processing, equipment and furniture: purchase, hire and maintenance
Informovanost o EU, obecné akce – výdaje na administrativní řízení
23 Current administrative expenditure
· nové audiovizuální centrum.
The actions run by the Council
Komunikace je samozřejmě klíčovou otázkou, pokud jde o volby v roce 2009.
Appropriations allocated to communication policy are presented in the following table.
21 Zpracování dat, vybavení a nábytek: nákupy, pronájem, údržba
2213 Information and public events
23 Běžné administrativní výdaje
3312 Information and public events (PESD&PESC)
104 Rezerva pro informační a komunikační politiku
The EU is a common project shared by all levels of government, all types of organisation and people from all walks of life.
Celkový počet zaměstnanců: Generální ředitelství pro informace (včetně dočasných , smluvních a externích zaměstnanců)
According to the Mission Statement of the European Parliament, the Information Offices of the European Parliament shall be responsible for delivery of DG Information's overall information and communication strategy in the Member States.
ANNEX: TABLE 1
16 01 03
SECTION III - COMMISSION BUDGET ALLOCATED TO TITLE 16 - COMMUNICATION (2005-2008)
Dépenses relatives aux achats d'équipements et de services, dépenses immobilières et autres dépenses de fonctionnement du domaine polituque "Communication"
16 01 01
16 01 04
Dépenses liées au personnel en activité du domaine politique "Communication"
Dépenses d'appui aux actions du domaine politique "Communication"
16 01 02
16 01
Personnel externe et autres dépenses de gestion à l'appui du domaine politique "Communication"
Sub total
16 01 04
16 02 03
Dépenses d'appui aux actions du domaine politique "Communication"
Informations destinées aux médias
16 01
16 02 04
Sub total
Exploitation des studios de radiodiffusion et de télévisions et équipements audiovisuels
16 02 03
16 03 02
Informations destinées aux médias
Actions locales
16 02 04
16 03 04
Exploitation des studios de radiodiffusion et de télévisions et équipements audiovisuels
Actions spécifiques sur des thèmes prioritaires, dont PRINCE
16 03 02
16 03
Actions locales
Sub total
16 03 04
16 04 01
Actions spécifiques sur des thèmes prioritaires, dont PRINCE
Analyse de l'opinion publique (ex 16 03 01)
16 03 05
16 04 02
16 04 01
16 04 04
Analyse de l'opinion publique (ex 16 03 01)
Publications écrites générales (ex 16 03 03)
16 04 02
16 04
Outils d'information et de communication en ligne
Sub total
16 04 03
16 05 01
Publications écrites ciblées
Relais d'information
16 05 01
16 05
Relais d'information
Sub total
ANNEX: TABLE 2 IMPLEMENTATION POLICY AREA 16 - COMMUNICATION as of 31/12/2006
Implementation on 31/12/2005 (%)
Total Implementation
16 01 04 01
Implementation same date lst year
Actions générales d'information sur l'Union européenne — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
16 01 04 01
16 01 04 02
Actions générales d'information sur l'Union européenne — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
Relais d'information — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
16 01 04 02
16 01 04 03
Relais d'information — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
Prince (programme d'information du citoyen européen) — Actions d'information pour des politiques spécifiques — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
16 01 04 03
16 01 04 04
Prince (programme d'information du citoyen européen) — Actions d'information pour des politiques spécifiques — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
Actions de communication — Dépenses pour la gestion administrative
16 01 04 04
Total 16 01
Total 16 01
16 02 03
Communication directe — Médias
Actions de communication
16 03 01
16 03 04
Analyse de l'opinion publique et actions de proximité
Prince — Débat sur l'avenir de l'Union européenne
Pracovní dokument k PNR na rok 2008 – První analýza
Working document on PDB 2008 - First analysis
Předběžný návrh rozpočtu (PNR) na rok 2008 Komise přijala dne 2. května 2007.
The Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2008 was adopted by the Commission on 2 May 2007.
Rozpočet na rok 2008 bude druhým rozpočtem, který má být schválen podle víceletého finančního rámce (VFR) na období 2007–2013, jak je schváleno v interinstitucionální dohodě (IID) ze dne 17. května 2006.
The 2008 budget will be the second that is set to be agreed within the framework of the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) 2007 - 2013 as agreed in the Inter-institutional agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006.
V tomto pracovním dokumentu je uveden počáteční přehled hlavních číselných údajů a témat zahrnutých do PNR.
This working document provides an initial overview of the main figures and subjects covered in the PDB.
Struktura tohoto dokumentu se řídí strukturou okruhů VFR.
The structure of the present working document accords with the heading structure of the MFF.
Tato struktura je v souladu s politickou prezentací PNR ze strany Komise.
This is in line with the political presentation of the PDB by the Commission.
Po počátečním přehledu číselných údajů a několika obecných poznámkách zpravodaje se pracovní dokument zabývá hlavními prvky vývoje PNR na pozadí struktury okruhů VFR a některými konkrétními horizontálními otázkami.
After an initial overview of the figures, and some general comments by the rapporteur, the working document looks at the main developments in the PDB across the MFF heading structure and at some specific horizontal issues.
PNR na rok 2008 je sám o sobě v podstatě dokument zaměřený do budoucnosti, ale zpravodaj připomíná důležitost sledování provádění rozpočtu v průběhu roku 2007 a během práce Parlamentu při přípravě rozpočtu na rok 2008.
The PDB 2008 itself is essentially a forward looking document, but your rapporteur recalls the importance of monitoring budget implementation during 2007 and also during Parliament's work on the preparation of the 2008 budget.
Přehled číselných údajů podle okruhů VFR
Overview of figures by MFF heading
Tabulka 1a – PNR na rok 2008: závazky a platby (v běžných cenách v EUR)
Table 1a - PDB 2008: commitments and payments (EUR current prices)
PNR na rok 2008
PDB 2008
Evropská unie jako globální hráč
The European Union as global partner
* včetně položek ve výši 500 milionů EUR týkajících se Evropského fondu pro přizpůsobení se globalizaci, které se nezapočítávají do rezervy
* including appropriations of EUR 500 million related to the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund which do not count for the margin
** včetně položek ve výši 239,2 milionů EUR týkajících se rezervy na pomoc při mimořádných událostech, které se nezapočítávají do rezervy
** including appropriations of EUR 239,2 million related to the Emergency Aid Reserve which do not count for the margin
*** včetně položek ve výši 77 milionů EUR týkajících se poznámky pod čarou (1) finančního rámce na období 2007–2013 (příspěvky zaměstnanců do důchodového systému), které se nezapočítávají do rezervy
*** including appropriations of EUR 77 million related to footnote (1) of the Financial Framework 2007 - 2013 (staff contributions to the pensions scheme) which do not count for the margin
V tabulce 1a se uvádí položky závazků začleněné do PNR na rok 2008 v celkové výši 129 167 milionů EUR.
Table 1a sets out the commitment appropriations as included in the PDB 2008 with a total of EUR 129 167 million.
Podle tabulky 1b jde oproti rozpočtu na rok 2007 o 2% nárůst.
As per table 1b, this is an increase of 2 % on Budget 2007.
Povinné výdaje klesají o 1,2 % a nepovinné výdaje vzrůstají o 3,8 %.
Compulsory expenditure decreases by 1,2%, and non-compulsory expenditure increases by 3,8 %.
Lví podíl z povinných výdajů v PNR na rok 2008 připadá na zemědělské výdaje v rámci okruhu 2.
The lion's share of compulsory expenditure in the PDB 2008 is covered by agricultural spending within heading 2.
Zjištěný trend odklonu od povinných výdajů směrem k nepovinným výdajům je v souladu s tím, co zdůraznila komisařka Grybauskaitė ve svém vystoupení před Rozpočtovým výborem dne 2. května 2007, kdy uvedla, že PNR na rok 2008 je prvním návrhem rozpočtu, ve kterém plánované výdaje v rámci okruhu 1 (konkurenceschopnost a soudržnost) přesahují výdaje v rámci okruhu 2 (ochrana přírodních zdrojů a hospodaření s nimi).
The observed trend away from compulsory expenditure and towards non-compulsory expenditure is in line with the point emphasised by Commissioner Grybauskaitė in her presentation to COBU on 2 May 2007 that the PDB 2008 is the first in which planned spending under Heading 1 (competitiveness and cohesion) exceeds that under Heading 2 (preservation and management of natural resources).
Souhrnně řečeno, ponechávají číselné údaje v PNR na rok 2008 rezervu ve výši 3 135,7 milionů EUR pod stropem VFR.
In aggregate, commitment figures in PDB 2008 leave a margin of EUR 3 135,7 million under the MFF ceiling.
Podle poslední prognózy pro HND EU ve výši 12 589,2 miliard EUR se celkové závazky rovnají 1,03 % HND.
According to the latest forecast for EU GNI of EUR 12 589,2 billion, the commitments total is equivalent to 1,03 % of GNI.
Pro srovnání: strop závazků na rok 2008 dohodnutý v příloze 1 IID ze dne 17. května 2006 se rovná 1,06 % HND.
For comparison: the 2008 commitment ceiling as agreed in Annex 1 to the IIA of 17 May 2006 equals 1,06 % of GNI.
Tabulka: 1b Přehled PNR na rok 2008 – změny oproti rozpočtu na rok 2007 (v %)
Table: 1b Overview of PDB 2008 - Changes to Budget 2007 (in %)
PNR na rok 2008 v porovnání s rozpočtem na rok 2007
PDB 2008 compared to B'2007
3a Svoboda, bezpečnost a právo
3a Freedom, security and justice
4 Evropská unie jako globální hráč
4 The European Union as a global partner
6 Náhrady
6 Compensation
Celková částka položek plateb činí 121 582 milionů EUR.
The overall total for payment appropriations is EUR 121 582 million.
Tabulka 1b ukazuje, že oproti roku 2007 jde o nárůst o 5,3 %.
Table 1b shows that this is an increase of 5,3 % compared to 2007.
Výše plateb v PNR na rok 2008 odpovídá 0,97 % HND EU.
The payments level in the PDB 2008 corresponds to 0,97 % of EU GNI.
Strop plateb pro rok 2008 ve výši 129 481 milionů EUR přijatý v příloze 1 IID činí 1,04 % HND.
The 2008 payments ceiling of EUR 129 481 million as adopted in Annex 1 to the IIA actually amounts to 1,04 % of GNI.
V porovnání s těmito číselnými údaji ponechává PNR na rok 2008 na položky plateb rezervu ve výši 8 214 milionů EUR.
Compared to these figures, PDB 2008 leaves a margin of EUR 8 214 million for payment appropriations.
Váš zpravodaj upozorňuje, že tím je pod stropem plateb ponechána velká rezerva.
Your rapporteur highlights that this leaves a large margin under the payments ceiling.
Je třeba doufat, že přesné provádění rozpočtu a výdaje na politické priority v souladu s důrazem, který Parlament klade na „rozpočet zaměřený na výsledky“, by měly v rozpočtu na rok 2008 umožnit vyšší úroveň plateb, než předpokládá Komise v PNR.
It is to be hoped that accurate budget implementation and spending on political priorities in line with Parliament's emphasis on a "budget for results" should facilitate a higher level of payments in the 2008 budget than has been foreseen by the Commission in the PDB.
Obecné poznámky zpravodaje – rozpočet zaměřený na výsledky
Rapporteur's general comments - a budget for results
V souladu s usnesením Parlamentu o roční politické strategii (RPS) Komise na rok 2008
In line with Parliament's resolution on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy (APS) for 2008
P6 TA-PROV(2007)0131 je přehlednost formální podoby rozpočtu pro Evropský parlament prvořadá.
P6 TA-PROV(2007)0131 , clarity of budget presentation is a priority of the European Parliament.
Zpravodaj bude nadále zdůrazňovat, jak důležité je vypracovat pro rok 2008 „rozpočet zaměřený na výsledky“.
Your rapporteur will continue to stress the importance of delivering a 2008 "budget for results".
Výsledků lze však dosáhnout a měřit je pouze v případě, že jsou jasné cíle.
But results can only be achieved and measured if objectives are clear.