natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Hlavní zásady, pokud jde o „demarkační čáru“ a koordinační mechanismus mezi akcemi podporovanými z různých fondů, musí být stanoveny na úrovni vnitrostátního strategického referenčního rámce/vnitrostátního strategického plánu.
The main guiding principles as regards the demarcation line and the coordination mechanisms between actions supported by the different Funds should be defined at the level of national strategic reference framework/national strategy plan.
Je třeba podporovat součinnost mezi strukturálními politikami, politikami zaměstnanosti a politikami rozvoje venkova a následně také spolupráci mezi různými regionálními partnery .
The synergy between structural, employment and rural development policies needs to be encouraged as well as, consequently, cooperation between the different regional partners.
V této souvislosti by členské státy měly zajistit komplementaritu a soudržnost mezi akcemi financovanými ze sedmého rámcového programu, z rámcového programu pro konkurenceschopnost a inovaci, TEN-T, LIFE +, Evropského fondu pro regionální rozvoj (ERDF), Fondu soudržnosti, Evropského sociálního fondu (ESF), Evropského rybářského fondu (EFF) a Evropského zemědělského fondu pro rozvoj venkova (EAFRD) na daném území a v dané oblasti činností.
In this context, Member States should ensure complementarity and coherence between actions to be financed by the 7 th framework Programme, the Competitiveness and Innovation framework Programme,TEN-T, LIFE +, the ERDF, Cohesion Fund, ESF, EFF and EAFRD on a given territory and in a given field of activity.
Hlavní zásady, pokud jde o „demarkační čáru“ a koordinační mechanismus mezi akcemi podporovanými z různých fondů, musí být stanoveny na úrovni regionálního nebo vnitrostátního strategického referenčního rámce/ regionálního nebo vnitrostátního strategického plánu, podle toho která z variant bude v příslušném členském státě vhodnější.
The main guiding principles as regards the demarcation line and the coordination mechanisms between actions supported by the different Funds should be defined at the level of regional or national strategic reference framework /regional or national strategy plan , whichever is the more appropriate for the Member State concerned.
Příloha bod 3.6 pododstavec 1a (nový)
Annex, point 3.6, paragraph 1a (new)
(1a) Je možné uplatnit různá kritéria vymezení, jako je rozsah projektu, územní (regionální nebo podregionální) dopad, typ investice, typ poživatele atd.
(1a) A number of different demarcation criteria may be employed, such as project size, territorial impact (regional or infra-regional), investment type, beneficiary type, etc.
Pokud jde o rozvoj lidského kapitálu, měla by být podpora v rámci rozvoje venkova cílena na zemědělce a hospodářské subjekty podílející se na diverzifikaci hospodářství venkova.
As regards the development of human capital, support under rural development would target farmers and the economic actors involved in the diversification of the rural economy.
Obyvatelstvo venkovských oblastí by mohlo obdržet podporu jako součást integrovaného přístupu zdola nahoru.
The population of rural areas could receive support as part of an integrated, bottom-up approach.
Činnosti v těchto oblastech by se měly provádět plně v souladu s cíli evropské strategie zaměstnanosti, jak je stanoví integrované hlavní směry pro růst a zaměstnanost, a v souladu s činnostmi prováděnými na základě vnitrostátních reformních programů v rámci lisabonského procesu.
Actions in these fields should be implemented in full compliance with the objectives of the European Employment Strategy, as set out in the Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs and coherent with the actions taken under the national reform programmes in the framework of the Lisbon process.
Pracovní program Vzdělávání a odborná příprava 2010 se snaží dosáhnout lisabonských cílů, které se týkají vzdělávání a odborné přípravy.
The Education and Training 2010 work programme seeks to achieve the education and the training side of the Lisbon goals.
Jádrem programu je celoživotní vzdělávání, které se vztahuje na všechny úrovně a typy vzdělávání a odborné přípravy, a to i v odvětví zemědělství, lesnictví a potravinářství.
Lifelong learning is at the heart of this programme and applies to all levels and types of education and training, including the agricultural, forestry and agrifood sectors.
Pokud jde o rozvoj lidského kapitálu, měla by být podpora v rámci rozvoje venkova cílena na zemědělce a jejich rodiny a na hospodářské subjekty podílející se na diverzifikaci hospodářství venkova.
As regards the development of human capital, support under rural development would target farmers and their families and the economic actors involved in the diversification of the rural economy.
Byly by koordinováni také pomocí podpory poskytnuté dalšími strukturálními nástroji .
They would also be coordinated with support afforded under other structural instruments .
V souvislosti s podporou v rámci opatření pro rozvoj venkova je třeba brát ohled na zemědělce i jeho rodinu.
The farmer as well as his family should be taken into consideration for support under rural development measures.
Rámec poskytne omezený soubor společných ukazatelů a společnou metodiku.
The framework will provide a limited set of common indicators and a common methodology.
Doplní jej ukazatele specifické pro programy, které budou odrážet povahu každé programové oblasti.
It will be supplemented by programme-specific indicators to reflect the character of each programme area.
, a společnou metodiku.
, as well as a common methodology.
With rural areas covering over 90% of the EU's territory and holding over 50% of its population, rural development has become an important part of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy.
With rural areas covering over 90% of the EU's territory and holding over 50% of its population, rural development has become an important part of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy.
The new Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 agreed by Member States on 20 September 2005 is based on the agreement that market policy reforms in the first pillar shall be complemented with robust reform of the second pillar.
The new Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 agreed by Member States on 20 September 2005 is based on the agreement that market policy reforms in the first pillar shall be complemented with robust reform of the second pillar.
This decision affirms a stronger strategic orientation towards rural development policy as well as the necessity to ensure coherence between the activities of the two pillars.
This decision affirms a stronger strategic orientation towards rural development policy as well as the necessity to ensure coherence between the activities of the two pillars.
Rural development policy for the next financial period (2007-2013) will focus on the three axes of measures laid down in the new rural development Regulation: improving competitiveness for farming and forestry, improving the environment and countryside and improving the quality of life and diversification of the rural economy.
Rural development policy for the next financial period (2007-2013) will focus on the three axes of measures laid down in the new rural development Regulation: improving competitiveness for farming and forestry, improving the environment and countryside and improving the quality of life and diversification of the rural economy.
A fourth axis based on experience with the Leader programme introduces opportunities for bottom-up approaches to rural development at local level.
A fourth axis based on experience with the Leader programme introduces opportunities for bottom-up approaches to rural development at local level.
Overall, the main features of the agreed rural development Regulation with a stronger strategic orientation of rural development policy are:
Overall, the main features of the agreed rural development Regulation with a stronger strategic orientation of rural development policy are:
- drawing up of measures around the four axes which are based on the four main objectives;
- drawing up of measures around the four axes which are based on the four main objectives;
- definition of minimum spendings on the four axes, with a minimum of 10% of the national 'envelope' to be spent on Axis 1 and 2, a minimum of 25% on Axis 3 and a minimum of 5% on Axis 4;
- definition of minimum spendings on the four axes, with a minimum of 10% of the national 'envelope' to be spent on Axis 1 and 3, a minimum of 25% on Axis 2 and a minimum of 5% on Axis 4;
- clarification of roles and division of responsibilities between Members States and Commission;
- clarification of roles and division of responsibilities between Members States and Commission;
- a consolidated bottom-up approach : Member States, regions and local action groups will have more say in aligning programmes to local needs;
- a consolidated bottom-up approach : Member States, regions and local action groups will have more say in aligning programmes to local needs;
- a new, strategic programming approach for rural development, intended to ensure that rural development programming both focuses on EU priorities and complements EU policies.
- a new, strategic programming approach for rural development, intended to ensure that rural development programming both focuses on EU priorities and complements EU policies.
The Commission will draw up Community strategic guidelines and the Member States with reference to these guidelines, will develop National Strategy Plans.
The Commission will draw up Community strategic guidelines and the Member States with reference to these guidelines, will develop National Strategy Plans.
In this context, the new Regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) provides in its Article 9 for the adoption of Community level strategic guidelines for rural development for the programming period 2007 to 2013.
In this context, the new Regulation on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) provides in its Article 9 for the adoption of Community level strategic guidelines for rural development for the programming period 2007 to 2013.
The Commission therefore has provided the proposal for a Council Decision with the Community strategic guidelines as annex.
The Commission therefore has provided the proposal for a Council Decision with the Community strategic guidelines as annex.
The Community guidelines aim at setting the strategic priorities for rural development to implement the axes laid down in the Regulation.
The Community guidelines aim at setting the strategic priorities for rural development to implement the axes laid down in the Regulation.
They may be subject to a review if important changes in the Community priorities in particular occur.
They may be subject to a review if important changes in the Community priorities in particular occur.
The Commission's proposed guidelines define the priorities at EU level and are strongly driven by the objectives set out by the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and the Göteborg sustainability goals.
The Commission's proposed guidelines define the priorities at EU level and are strongly driven by the objectives set out by the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs and the Göteborg sustainability goals.
Within the framework of the new rural development Regulation, the guidelines specifically aim to:
Within the framework of the new rural development Regulation, the guidelines specifically aim to:
- define the areas where EU funding can create the most value added at EU level;
- define the areas where EU funding can create the most value added at EU level;
- translate the main EU priorities (Lisbon, Göteborg) into rural development;
- translate the main EU priorities (Lisbon, Göteborg) into rural development;
- ensure consistency in programming with other EU policies, especially cohesion and environment policy;
- ensure consistency in programming with other EU policies, especially cohesion and environment policy;
- support the implementation of the new CAP and the necessary restructuring in the old and new Member States.
- support the implementation of the new CAP and the necessary restructuring in the old and new Member States.
To bring rural development policy into line with the Community’s priorities, the proposal foresees six Community strategic guidelines for Member States when preparing their national strategy plans and for the drawing up of rural development programmes:
To bring rural development policy into line with the Community’s priorities, the proposal foresees six Community strategic guidelines for Member States when preparing their national strategy plans and for the drawing up of rural development programmes:
Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sectors: contributing to a strong and dynamic agri-food sector, with the priorities of knowledge transfer, innovation in the food chain, investment in physical and human capital;
Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sectors: contributing to a strong and dynamic agri-food sector, with the priorities of knowledge transfer, innovation in the food chain, investment in physical and human capital;
Improving the environment and countryside: contributing to the priorities of biodiversity and sustainability;
Improving the environment and countryside: contributing to the priorities of biodiversity and sustainability;
Improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification: priority on employment opportunities;
Improving the quality of life in rural areas and encouraging diversification: priority on employment opportunities;
Building local capacity for employment and diversification: priorities of improving governance and mobilising the capacity for development of the rural communities;
Building local capacity for employment and diversification: priorities of improving governance and mobilising the capacity for development of the rural communities;
Translating priorities into programmes: priorities of ensuring compatibility with other EU level strategies and avoiding contradictions within rural development programme;
Translating priorities into programmes: priorities of ensuring compatibility with other EU level strategies and avoiding contradictions within rural development programme;
Complementarity between Community instruments: priority of ensuring coherence between the different EU funding instruments by the Member States.
Complementarity between Community instruments: priority of ensuring coherence between the different EU funding instruments by the Member States.
For each of the guidelines 1 to 4, the proposal suggests a non-exhaustive number of key actions that Member States should take to meet the priorities as set out in the guidelines.
For each of the guidelines 1 to 4, the proposal suggests a non-exhaustive number of key actions that Member States should take to meet the priorities as set out in the guidelines.
Regarding the reporting system for the monitoring of the Community guidelines and the national strategies, the proposal suggests that common and baseline indicators have to be provided within the common framework for monitoring and evaluation.
Regarding the reporting system for the monitoring of the Community guidelines and the national strategies, the proposal suggests that common and baseline indicators have to be provided within the common framework for monitoring and evaluation.
It stresses further the European network for rural development to be involved as an exchange platform.
It stresses further the European network for rural development to be involved as an exchange platform.
Comments from the Rapporteur
Comments from the Rapporteur
Your Rapporteur welcomes the proposal (which will accompany the rural development Regulation) since it responds to the necessity to give Member States more clarity and guidance with regards to its implementation whilst also giving enough flexibility for them to choose the programmes that fit best their specific needs.
Your Rapporteur welcomes the proposal (which will accompany the rural development Regulation) since it responds to the necessity to give Member States more clarity and guidance with regards to its implementation whilst also giving enough flexibility for them to choose the programmes that fit best their specific needs.
Amendments tabled by the Rapporteur include specific issues related to the need to add modernisation measures for the agriculture and forestry sectors as well as the importance of measures aimed to encourage young farmers and their families to stay in rural areas.
Amendments tabled by the Rapporteur include specific issues related to the need to add modernisation measures for the agriculture and forestry sectors as well as the importance of measures aimed to encourage young farmers and their families to stay in rural areas.
Village renewal, sustainable farming and preservation of the rural heritage are also key areas which need to be emphasised.
Village renewal, sustainable farming and preservation of the rural heritage are also key areas which need to be emphasised.
EU farming faces new challenges from the WTO, the outcome of which is still uncertain.
EU farming faces new challenges from the WTO, the outcome of which is still uncertain.
Rural development policy can assist in meeting some of those challenges.
Rural development policy can assist in meeting some of those challenges.
However, it is worth noting that should the outcome of the WTO destabilise EU agriculture and food markets then this would have a very serious impact on rural Europe, an impact which not even an accelerated rural development policy could mitigate.
However, it is worth noting that should the outcome of the WTO destabilise EU agriculture and food markets then this would have a very serious impact on rural Europe, an impact which not even an accelerated rural development policy could mitigate.
A vibrant, commercial and sustainable agriculture is essential for the development of rural regions.
A vibrant, commercial and sustainable agriculture is essential for the development of rural regions.
In short, agriculture must remain central to the economies of rural regions.
In short, agriculture must remain central to the economies of rural regions.
Given that the Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mrs Fischer-Boel has said that the future of agriculture policy lies in rural development, it is unfortunate that the funding for rural development for 2007-2013 is uncertain.
Given that the Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mrs Fischer-Boel has said that the future of agriculture policy lies in rural development, it is unfortunate that the funding for rural development for 2007-2013 is uncertain.
Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and the introduction of decoupled payments should be honoured.
Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and the introduction of decoupled payments should be honoured.
Funding for rural development should not involve robbing the first pillar to pay for the second pillar.
Funding for rural development should not involve robbing the first pillar to pay for the second pillar.
k návrhu rozhodnutí Rady o strategických pokynech Společenství pro rozvoj venkova (Programové období 2007–2013)
on the proposal for a Council decision on Community strategic guidelines for Rural Development (Programming period 2007-2013)
Whilst there is much to be welcomed in the Strategic Guidelines, it is felt that certain problems arise from the manner in which they are framed.
Whilst there is much to be welcomed in the Strategic Guidelines, it is felt that certain problems arise from the manner in which they are framed.
First, there is no statement of an overall objective in terms of which the synergies between measures taken under each of the axes can be measured.
First, there is no statement of an overall objective in terms of which the synergies between measures taken under each of the axes can be measured.
Second, there is a degree of overlap both within and between the detailed guidelines under several of the axes.
Second, there is a degree of overlap both within and between the detailed guidelines under several of the axes.
This creates potential difficulties for Member States in determining under which of the axes parts of their programmes should fall.
This creates potential difficulties for Member States in determining under which of the axes parts of their programmes should fall.
There is also an occasional lack of clarity as to what exactly is being encouraged or, at least, permitted.
There is also an occasional lack of clarity as to what exactly is being encouraged or, at least, permitted.
Third, the main priority stated under each axis does not always fully reflect the thrust of the Council Regulation.
Third, the main priority stated under each axis does not always fully reflect the thrust of the Council Regulation.
In addition, some clarification seems to be needed as to whose activities the axes are directed, particularly because of the funding proportions allocated under the Regulation to each of them.
In addition, some clarification seems to be needed as to whose activities the axes are directed, particularly because of the funding proportions allocated under the Regulation to each of them.
In this context, it is taken by the draftsperson that:
In this context, it is taken by the draftsperson that:
a) axis 1 is intended to relate principally to those involved in primary production in the agricultural and forestry sectors, with the purpose of promoting both on farm and in forest diversification and involvement in activities that will create efficiencies in or add value to the primary production;
a) axis 1 is intended to relate principally to those involved in primary production in the agricultural and forestry sectors, with the purpose of promoting both on farm and in forest diversification and involvement in activities that will create efficiencies in or add value to the primary production;
b) axis 2 is intended to cover all actors, including those concerned in primary production, involved with the provision of environmental goods, such as the promotion of biodiversity, increasing sustainability, preservation of the natural landscape and cultural heritage;
b) axis 2 is intended to cover all actors, including those concerned in primary production, involved with the provision of environmental goods, such as the promotion of biodiversity, increasing sustainability, preservation of the natural landscape and cultural heritage;
c) axis 3 is intended to assist rural communities more generally and in two related respects:
c) axis 3 is intended to assist rural communities more generally and in two related respects:
- first, in their economic development by the promotion of business activities appropriate to the rural economy, in the main other than by primary producers, such as secondary production, support services for primary production, the development of tourism, craft and other enterprises;
- first, in their economic development by the promotion of business activities appropriate to the rural economy, in the main other than by primary producers, such as secondary production, support services for primary production, the development of tourism, craft and other enterprises;
- second, in the improvement of local amenities with the purpose of achieving a good quality of life and averting depopulation.
- second, in the improvement of local amenities with the purpose of achieving a good quality of life and averting depopulation.
In both cases, there is emphasis on the potential of women and young people as economic actors.
In both cases, there is emphasis on the potential of women and young people as economic actors.
d) axis 4, following on the former Leader programme, is intended to bring together partnerships of those covered by each of the other axes with a view to the establishment of a coherent overall development strategy aligned to local conditions.
d) axis 4, following on the former Leader programme, is intended to bring together partnerships of those covered by each of the other axes with a view to the establishment of a coherent overall development strategy aligned to local conditions.