natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
П􏶶􏶰􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶺􏶵􏶬 2.48. 
Recommendations 2.48.
8.10.2019 􏶿. BG М􏶰􏷇􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶺􏷀 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶻􏶮 Ц􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶶􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶮 А􏶻􏶬я (IFCA) М􏶰􏷇􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶺􏷀 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶲 А􏶻􏶬я (AIF) М􏶰􏷇􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶺􏷀 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶲 Л􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶱􏶳􏶵􏶮 А􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶵􏶮 (LAIF) К􏶮􏶶􏶬􏶾􏶳􏶵􏶬 􏶬􏶱􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶷􏶱􏶰􏶱 􏷀􏶰􏷇􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶺􏷀 (CIF) М􏶰􏷇􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶺􏷀 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶲 Т􏶬􏷇􏶷􏶷􏶵􏶰􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶾􏶮􏶳􏶰􏶹􏶱 (IFP) Ф􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶷􏶲􏶬 􏶬􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶬 — 􏶵􏶺􏷀 31 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶰􏷀􏶲􏶶􏶬 2018 􏶿. 
C 340/54 Official Journal of the European Union 8.10.2019 EN Investment Facility for Central Asia (IFCA) Asia Investment Facility (AIF) Latin America Investment Facility (LAIF) Caribbean Investment Facility (CIF) Investment Facility for the Pacific (IFP) Financial instruments — as at 31 December 2018 Managed by 29 30 31 32 33 EIB EIB EIB EIB EIB
8.10.2019 􏶿. О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 C 340/55 BG ГЛАВА 3 П􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶳􏶺􏶳 􏶳􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ В􏶺􏶲􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 Ч􏶮􏶳􏶴 1 — К􏶮􏶵􏶲􏶷 􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶵􏶶􏶬􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС? 
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/55 EN CHAPTER 3 Getting results from the EU budget CONTENTS Introduction Part 1 — What do the EU budget performance indicators tell us?
C 340/56 О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 8.10.2019 􏶿. 
C 340/56 Official Journal of the European Union 8.10.2019 EN Introduction 3.1.
Т􏶮􏶻􏶬 􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶸􏶷-􏶳􏶸􏶰􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶷: 1) 􏶵􏶮􏶵􏶲􏶷 􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶵􏶶􏶬􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС; 2) 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶷􏶴 􏶳􏶸􏶰􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼􏶬 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 2018 􏶿. 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷; 3) 􏶬 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶺􏶵􏶬􏶴􏶰, 􏶵􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶷 ЕСП 􏶰 􏶷􏶴􏶸􏶶􏶮􏶲􏶬􏶯􏶮 􏶲 􏶳􏶲􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶳􏶸􏶰􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼􏶬, 􏶸􏷄􏶾􏶯􏶬􏶵􏷄􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶻 2015 􏶿. 
This year we have looked at: (1) what the EU budget performance indicators tell us; (2) the main results from our 2018 special reports on performance; (3) and the implementation of the recommendations we made in the special reports we published in 2015.
Ч􏶮􏶳􏶴 1 — К􏶮􏶵􏶲􏶷 􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶵􏶶􏶬􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС? 
Part 1 — What do the EU budget performance indicators tell us?
Т􏶰􏶻􏶬 22 􏶬􏶻􏶾􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 􏶷􏶾􏷇􏶲􏶮􏷆􏶮􏶴 97 % 􏶷􏶴 􏶫􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶷􏶲􏶷􏶴􏶷 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶳􏶰􏶼􏶰􏷀􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏷃􏶱􏶬я 􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶷􏶼 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶯􏶷􏶽􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 3.1 􏶻􏶮 􏶳􏶸􏶬􏶳􏶺􏶵 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰). 
The 22 selected programmes covered 97 % of the financial programming for the seven-year period (see Annex 3.1 for list of programmes).
3.6. 
3.6.
(1) Ч􏶯􏶰􏶱 317 􏶷􏶴 Д􏶷􏶿􏶷􏶲􏶷􏶶􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬􏶷􏶱􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 ЕС. 
(1) Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
(2) В􏶽. „П􏶶􏶷􏶰􏶵􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶷􏶾􏷆 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 􏶻􏶮 􏶫􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶮 2019 – Р􏶮􏶾􏶷􏶴􏶰􏶱 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 – Ч􏶮􏶳􏶴 I – П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬“, COM(2018) 600, 􏷀􏶮􏶹 2018 􏶿. 
(2) See ‘Draft General Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019 – Working document – Part I – programme statements of operational expenditure – COM(2018)600 – May 2018’.
(3) В􏶽. Бю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴 􏶱􏶮 ЕС 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶷􏶼􏶮 2014—2020 􏶿., П􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 – 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶼􏶵􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬, П􏶶􏶷􏶰􏶵􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴 􏶻􏶮 2019 􏶿., COM(2018) 600, 􏷀􏶮􏶹 2018 􏶿. 
(3) See ‘EU Budget 2014-2020 Programmes’ Performance Overview – Extract from programme statements of operational expenditure Draft Budget 2019 – COM(2018)600 – May 2018'.
8.10.2019 􏶿. О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 C 340/57 BG Р􏶮􏶻􏶼􏶰􏶯 А — П􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶵􏶶􏶬􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶻􏶱􏶮􏷅􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏶵􏶬 􏶲 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶬 􏶳􏶷􏷅􏶮􏶴 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶭я􏶯􏶷 3.7. 
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/57 EN Section A – The indicators show significant variation in achievements and suggest moderate progress overall 3.7.
(4), К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲я 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶱􏶮􏶼􏶰􏶽􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬. 
As we noted in the 2016 annual report (4), the Commission does not provide information on the reliability of the underlying data in programme statements.
Т􏶮􏶻􏶬 􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶼􏶷􏶯􏶷􏶿􏶬я 􏶰 􏷃􏶬􏶶􏶷􏶵􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶮 􏶬 􏶰 􏶯􏶰􏶳􏶱􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯я􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 (6). 
This methodology is widely used and is easy to calculate (6).
К􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.1 Р􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏶱􏶮􏷅􏶬􏶱􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯я􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶮 Б􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 Д􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴 Ц􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 Н􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 Н􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 % И􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶷􏶴 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 40 70 100 30 30/(100-40)=50 % И􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶷􏶴 􏶱􏷄􏶯􏶮 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 40 70 100 70 70/100=70 % И􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵: ЕСП. 3.10. 
Box 3.1 Different ways of calculating progress Baseline Actual result Target Progress Progress % Progress calculated from baseline towards target 40 70 100 30 30/(100-40)=50 % Progress calculated from zero towards target 40 70 100 70 70/100=70 % Source: ECA 3.10.
(4) З􏶮􏶾􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶽􏶵􏶮: 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶺􏶵􏶮 5 􏶷􏶴 􏶿􏶯􏶮􏶲􏶮 3 􏶷􏶴 Г􏶷􏶼􏶬􏷃􏶱􏶬я 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼 􏶻􏶮 2016 􏶿. (􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶵􏶮 3.77) С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴􏶸􏶶􏶮􏶲я 􏶬􏶳􏶵􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶵􏶺􏷀 К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 „􏶲 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶷􏶴􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶼􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶷􏷅􏶲􏶮 􏶼􏶮􏶯􏶬, 􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶰􏶼 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я, 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶳􏶮 􏶳 􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶺􏷅􏶱􏶷 􏶼􏶷􏶾􏶶􏶷 􏶵􏶮􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷“. (5) Б􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬 􏶻􏶮􏶲􏶬􏶳я􏶴 􏶷􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я, 􏶱􏶷 􏶸􏶷 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶱􏶭􏶬􏶸 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶯я􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶳􏶺􏶷􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶬я 􏶮􏶳􏶸􏶰􏶵􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶵􏶺􏷀 1.12014 􏶿. 
(4) Note: in recommendation 5 of Chapter 3 of the 2016 annual report (paragraph 3.77), we asked the Commission to “indicate in core performance reports whether, to the best of their knowledge, the performance information is of sufficient quality”. (5) The baselines depended on the availability of information but were in principle the data on the relevant aspect of the programme available on 1.1.2014.
(6) В􏶽. 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶬􏷀􏶰􏶶 „И􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶼􏶬􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶱􏶭􏶬я􏶴􏶮 􏶼􏶷 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 ЦУР: 􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶱􏶵􏶮 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶺􏶼􏶰 􏶳􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬 􏶼􏶺􏶶􏶽􏶮􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶷􏶴 ОИСР“ (Measuring distance to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets — An assessment of where OECD countries stand), ю􏶱􏶬 2017 􏶿., ОИСР, 􏶳􏶴􏶶. 
(6) See for example ‘Measuring distance to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets – An assessment of where OECD countries stand – June 2017 – OECD’ p.
15, 􏶴􏶮􏶾􏶯􏶬􏶭􏶮 3. 
15 ‘Table 3.
П􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶬􏷀􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶮 􏶬 􏶱􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶺􏶭􏶬 􏶱􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶼􏷄􏶶􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶱􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶯􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶰 (Pros and cons of different normalisation procedures). 
Pros and cons of different normalisation procedures’.
(7) Р􏶮􏶾􏶷􏶴􏶰􏶱 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶳􏶯􏷄􏶽􏶾􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮, „Н􏶮􏶳􏶷􏶵􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶷-􏶼􏶷􏶾􏶶􏶷 􏶶􏶰􏶿􏷄􏶯􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶰“, SWD (2017) 350 􏶷􏶵􏶷􏶱􏷅􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶱, 7.7.2017 􏶿., 􏶳􏶴􏶶. 
(7) See ‘Commission Staff Working Document – Better Regulation Guidelines – SWD(2017)350 Final – 7.7.2017’ p.
C 340/58 О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 8.10.2019 􏶿. 
C 340/58 Official Journal of the European Union 8.10.2019 EN 3.11.
К􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶭я􏶯􏶷 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶼􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶳􏶮 􏶷􏶴 2016 􏶿. 􏶲 42 % 􏶷􏶴 􏶳􏶯􏷄􏷅􏶮􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶬 􏶷􏶴 2017 􏶿. 􏶲 48 % 􏶷􏶴 􏶳􏶯􏷄􏷅􏶮􏶬􏶴􏶰. 
Overall, for our sample, the latest available data was from 2016 in 42 % of cases and 2017 in 48 % of cases.
С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶮􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶶􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷 􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶬􏶶􏶬 􏶷􏶴 23-􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 􏶸􏶷 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 1A „К􏶷􏶱􏶵􏷄􏶶􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶷􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶷􏶾􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶰􏶽 􏶬 􏶶􏶮􏶾􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶬 􏷀􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶮“ 􏶷􏶴 МФР (􏶲􏶽. 􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶷 􏶿􏶯􏶮􏶲􏶮 5): — И􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱􏶬я􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶻􏶮Р􏶮􏷀􏶵􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶱􏶮􏷄􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶬􏶻􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶬я􏶬􏶬􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬(„Х􏶷􏶶􏶬􏶻􏶷􏶱􏶴2020“)􏶰􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱—40%(􏶲􏶽.􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰3.3). 
We analysed the indicators of four of the 23 MFF heading 1A ‘Competitiveness for growth and jobs’ programmes (see also Chapter 5): — Progress measured for the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon 2020) was moderate at 40 % (see Box 3.3).
(9) С􏶯􏶰􏶼 􏶳􏶺􏶷􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶷 􏶴􏶶􏶬 􏶬 􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶬􏶶􏶬 􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶬 􏶷􏶴 􏶷􏶾􏷆􏶷 􏶳􏶰􏶼􏶰􏷀. 
(9) After three and four years out of seven, respectively.
Д􏶶􏷄􏶿􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶷􏶴 37 %. 
The other indicators showed moderate progress of 37 %.
И􏶻􏶾􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏷃􏶰􏶳􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶴 100 % 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏷀􏶰􏶽􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶻􏶮 2017 􏶿. 
The PPO selection of six indicators showed 100 % achievement of the 2017 intermediate targets (10).
(10) К􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.3 Ф􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 1􏶮 􏶷􏶴 МФР — 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶰􏶼 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 Б􏶶􏶷􏶹 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶸􏶷 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶼􏶷􏶯􏶷􏶿􏶬􏶬 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶵􏶮 3.9) О􏶾􏷆􏶷 С 􏶬􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶬􏷀 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 „Х􏶷􏶶􏶬􏶻􏶷􏶱􏶴 2020“ 52 13 40% 73% МСЕ 44 13 37% 23% „Е􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶺􏷀+“ 38 26 69% 100 % ЕФСИ 13 5 82% 100 % О􏶾􏷆􏶷 147 57 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬 46% 71% И􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵: ЕСП. 
Box 3.3 MFF heading 1a – Progress as shown by the EU budget performance indicators Programme Number of indicators Average progress towards target calculated with different methodologies (see paragraph 3.9) Total Progress from baseline measurable on the basis of programme statements on the basis of the PPO Horizon 2020 52 13 40% 73% CEF 44 13 37% 23% Erasmus+ 38 26 69% 100 % EFSI 13 5 82% 100 % Total 147 57 Weighted average 46% 71% Source: ECA Heading 1b: Indicators show relatively low progress for Cohesion due to late start 3.14.
Д􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶬 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶷􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶬􏶲􏶷 (31 %) 􏶰 􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶬􏶳􏶺􏶵, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 П􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 (40 %) 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶻􏶮 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 1Б „И􏶵􏶷􏶱􏶷􏷀􏶬􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶵􏶷, 􏶳􏶷􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶷 􏶬 􏶴􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶴􏶷􏶶􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶷 􏶳􏶾􏶯􏶬􏶽􏶮􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰“ 􏶷􏶴 МФР, 􏶵􏶷􏶿􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶮􏶴 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶱􏶷􏶻􏶱􏶬, 􏶮 􏶱􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬. 
While the progress from baseline percentage calculation (31 %) was rather low, the figure we calculated on the basis of the Commission’s PPO (40 %) showed moderate progress for MFF heading 1B ‘Economic, social and territorial cohesion’ when including forecast rather than actual data.
Т􏶮􏶻􏶬 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶲􏶮 􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶬􏶶􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶷 􏶿􏶯􏶮􏶲􏶮 6), 􏶵􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶷 􏶳􏶮 􏷅􏶮􏶳􏶴 􏶷􏶴 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶼􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮: — П􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 КФ 􏶬 ЕФРР 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶳􏶯􏶮􏶾 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶬 􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶮􏶼􏶬 􏶴􏶷􏶲􏶮, 􏷅􏶰 􏶳􏶮 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶳􏶮􏷀􏶷 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶭я􏶯􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 (11). 
This heading includes four programmes (see also Chapter 6), which were all part of our sample: — The indicators for the CF and the ERDF showed little progress also because only results for fully implemented operations (11) were reported.
Д􏶷􏶶􏶬 􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶬 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶱􏶷􏶻􏶬􏶴􏶰, 􏷅􏶬􏶹􏶴􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶰 􏶰 􏶷􏶾я􏶳􏶱􏶰􏶱, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 П􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮 􏶳􏶮􏷀􏶷 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶷􏶴 35 % 􏶻􏶮 КФ 􏶬 34 % 􏶻􏶮 ЕФРР (􏶲􏶽. 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.4). (10) З􏶮􏶾􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶽􏶵􏶮: 􏶻􏶮 􏶼􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶬 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶮 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴, С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶰, 􏷅􏶰 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶰 􏶱􏷄􏶯􏶮, 􏶲􏶺􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶵􏶬 􏷅􏶰 􏶴􏶮􏶻􏶬 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶱􏶰 􏶰 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶮 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬. (11) В 􏷀􏶷􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶺􏶷􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶴􏶷 􏶻􏶮􏶵􏶷􏶱􏶷􏶼􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷 􏶳􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶱я, 􏶻􏶮 􏶼􏶮 􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶰 􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼􏶲􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏷅􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬. 
Even including forecasts, for which the source is not explained, the figure we calculated on the basis of the Commission’s PPO showed only moderate progress of 35 % for the CF and 34 % for the ERDF (see Box 3.4). (10) Note: to calculate progress from the baseline, we considered that the baseline for indicators was zero even though this information was not included in the programme statements. (11) Modificationoftherelevantlegislationisunderwaytoallowreportingforpartiallyimplementedoperations.
К􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.4 Ф􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 1􏶾 􏶷􏶴 МФР — 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶰􏶼 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 Б􏶶􏶷􏶹 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶸􏶷 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶼􏶷􏶯􏶷􏶿􏶬􏶬 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶵􏶮 3.9) О􏶾􏷆􏶷 С 􏶬􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶬􏷀 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 ЕФРР 50 42 13% 34% ЕСФ 13 3 75% 55% КФ 22 13 26% 35% Ф􏶷􏶱􏶼 􏶻􏶮 􏶰􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶷 􏶸􏶷􏶼􏶸􏶷􏷀􏶮􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶱􏶮􏶹-􏶱􏷄􏶽􏶼􏶮􏶰􏷆􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶳􏶰 􏶯􏶬􏶭􏶮 2 2 50% 100 % О􏶾􏷆􏶷 87 60 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬 31% 40% И􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵: ЕСП. Ф􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 2: В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶰 􏶱􏶰􏶲􏶺􏶻􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶱􏶷 􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶺􏶴 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶲􏶰􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬 􏶲 􏶷􏶾􏶯􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я „П􏶶􏶬􏶶􏶷􏶼􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶰􏶳􏷄􏶶􏶳􏶬“ 3.15. 
Box 3.4 MFF heading 1b – Progress as shown by the EU budget performance indicators Programme Number of indicators Average progress towards target calculated with different methodologies (see paragraph 3.9) Total Progress from baseline measurable on the basis of programme statements on the basis of the PPO ERDF 50 42 13% 34% ESF 13 3 75% 55% CF 22 13 26% 35% Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived 2 2 50% 100 % Total 87 60 Weighted average 31% 40% Source: ECA Heading 2: On the basis of the indicators, it was not possible to determine progress for most expenditure in the area of ‘Natural resources’ 3.15.
С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶻􏶮 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 2 „П􏶶􏶬􏶶􏶷􏶼􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶰􏶳􏷄􏶶􏶳􏶬“ 􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶼􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶰 31 % (􏶲􏶽. 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.5) — 􏶱􏶮􏶹-􏶱􏶬􏶳􏶵􏶷􏶴􏶷 􏶶􏶮􏶲􏶱􏶬􏷆􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶲􏶳􏶬􏷅􏶵􏶬 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶷􏶴 МФР, 􏶻􏶮􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷 􏶳 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 1􏶾 􏶷􏶴 МФР. 
The weighted average progress for heading 2 ‘Natural resources’, based on our sample, was 31 % (see Box 3.5) – the lowest for all MFF headings together with MFF heading 1b.
(12) В􏶺􏶻􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶰􏶴􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я. 
(12) Based on five indicators.
8.10.2019 􏶿. О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 C 340/61 BG — З􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶻􏶰􏷀􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶯􏶳􏶵􏶬 􏶫􏶷􏶱􏶼 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶳􏶰􏶯􏶳􏶵􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶹􏶷􏶱􏶬 (ЕЗФРСР) 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶺􏶴 􏶰 28 %, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 24 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я. 
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/61 EN — FortheEuropeanAgriculturalFundforRuralDevelopment(EAFRD),progresswas28%,basedon24indicators.Inmostcases,thisfig-ure only reflected achievements in the first year of implementation.
Р􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶺􏶴 􏶰 58 % 􏶻􏶮 ЕФМДР (􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶷􏶳􏶰􏷀 􏶷􏶴 15-􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я) 􏶬 77 % 􏶻􏶮 LIFE (􏶲􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 21 􏶷􏶴 33-􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я). 
The result was 58 % for the EMFF (based on eight of the 15 indicators) and 77 % for LIFE (based on 21 of the 33 indicators).
Ф􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 3: П􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 „С􏶬􏶿􏷄􏶶􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶬 􏶿􏶶􏶮􏶽􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷“ 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶴 􏶼􏶲􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 􏶳 􏶼􏶷􏶾􏶺􏶶 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵, 􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶮 􏶳 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶬 􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶮􏷆􏶮 3.16. 
Source: ECA Heading 3: Indicators for ‘Security and citizenship’ show two programmes with good progress, one with moderate progress and one as lagging behind 3.16.
Т􏶰􏷇-􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶵􏶷􏷀􏶾􏶬􏶱􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱 􏶳􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶭я􏶯􏶷 􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶰􏷀􏶯􏶬􏶲 — 49 % (􏶲􏶽. 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.6). 
Their combined weighted average progress from baseline was an overall reasonable 49 % (see Box 3.6).
С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵, 􏶵􏶷􏶿􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶰 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶬 􏶸􏶷 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶷􏶴 2017􏶿., 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮, 􏷅􏶰 􏶬 􏶫􏶷􏶱􏶼 „У􏶾􏶰􏶽􏶬􏷆􏶰, 􏷀􏶬􏶿􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶬 􏶬􏶱􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬я“(53%), 􏶬 􏶫􏶷􏶱􏶼 „В􏶺􏶴􏶶􏶰􏷃􏶱􏶮 􏶳􏶬􏶿􏷄􏶶􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴“(56%) 􏶳􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶺􏶴 􏶼􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶯􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬. 
The average progress, when it could be calculated and using 2017 data, suggested that both the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (53 %) and the Internal Security Fund (56 %) were on track.
П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 „Т􏶲􏶷􏶶􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶵􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶮“ 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮 􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶷􏶴 41 %, 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 „Х􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶬 􏶫􏷄􏶶􏶮􏶽􏶬“ 􏶬􏶻􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶽􏶼􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶮 — 􏶱􏶰􏶹􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶰 20 %. 
The Creative Europe programme showed moderate progress of 41 %, while the Food and Feed programme appeared to be lagging behind with progress of 20 %.
С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶮􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶶􏶮 􏷅􏶰􏶴􏶬􏶶􏶬 􏶷􏶴 15-􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 􏶸􏶷 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 4 „Г􏶯􏶷􏶾􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶮“ 􏶷􏶴 МФР: И􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶳􏶺􏶴􏶶􏷄􏶼􏶱􏶬􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶬􏶰 (ИСР), Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶬􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 􏶻􏶮 􏶳􏶺􏶳􏶰􏶼􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷 (ЕИС), И􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶳􏶺􏶰􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏷀􏶷􏷆 (ИПП II) 􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏷇􏷄􏷀􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶮􏶶􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏷀􏶷􏷆 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶷 􏶿􏶯􏶮􏶲􏶮 9). 
We analysed four programmes of the 15 under MFF heading 4 ‘Global Europe’: the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI), the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI), the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) and Humanitarian Aid (see also Chapter 9).
С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬я􏶴 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶭я􏶯􏶷 􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶰􏷀􏶯􏶬􏶲 — 49 % (􏶻􏶮 49-􏶴􏶰 􏶷􏶴 􏶷􏶾􏷆􏶷 65 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯я, 􏶻􏶮 􏶵􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶷 􏶴􏶷􏶹 􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶰 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 — 􏶲􏶽. 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.7). 
The weighted average progress from baseline was overall reasonable at 49 % (for the 49 – out of a total of 65 – indicators for which it could be calculated – see Box 3.7).
К􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.7 Ф􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬я 4 􏶷􏶴 МФР — 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶰􏶼 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 Б􏶶􏶷􏶹 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴, 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶸􏶷 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶼􏶷􏶯􏶷􏶿􏶬􏶬 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶵􏶮 3.9) О􏶾􏷆􏶷 С 􏶬􏶻􏷀􏶰􏶶􏶬􏷀 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶳􏶸􏶶я􏷀􏶷 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 В􏶺􏶻 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 ИСР 11 11 50% 31% ЕИС 24 18 46% 79% ИПП II 19 11 41% 94% Х􏷄􏷀􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶮􏶶􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏷀􏶷􏷆 11 9 67% 93% О􏶾􏷆􏶷 65 49 С􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬 49% 68% И􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵: ЕСП. 
Box 3.7 MFF heading 4 - Progress as shown by the EU budget performance indicators Programme Number of indicators Average progress towards target calculated with different methodologies (see paragraph 3.9) Total Progress from baseline measurable on the basis of programme statements on the basis of the PPO DCI 11 11 50% 31% ENI 24 18 46% 79% IPA II 19 11 41% 94% Humanitarian aid 11 9 67% 93% Total 65 49 Weighted average 49% 68% Source: ECA
О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 C 340/63 С􏶸􏶰􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶬 􏶬􏶱􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶬 — 􏶱􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶺􏷅􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬я 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 3.20. 
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/63 EN Special instruments: Insufficient information on the progress achieved 3.20.
В􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶲 􏶻􏶮􏶵􏶷􏶱􏶷􏶼􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷􏶴􏶷 (13) 􏶭􏶰􏶯 􏶷􏶾􏶮􏷅􏶰 􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶮, 􏶴􏶺􏶹 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶲 􏶱􏶰􏶿􏶷 􏶳􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶷􏷅􏶲􏶮, 􏷅􏶰 „􏶾􏶰􏶱􏶰􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶴 􏷄􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏷅􏶬􏶲􏶮 􏶻􏶮􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶲􏶺􏶻􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶱􏶷 􏶱􏶮􏶹-􏶾􏶺􏶶􏶻􏶷...“. 
However, the objective included in the legislation (13) was different as it refers to ‘beneficiaries finding sustainable employment as soon as possible...’.
(13) Р􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶮􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 (ЕС) No 1309/2013 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶸􏶮􏶶􏶯􏶮􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 􏶬 􏶱􏶮 С􏶺􏶲􏶰􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 17 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶰􏷀􏶲􏶶􏶬 2013 􏶿. 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶫􏶷􏶱􏶼 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶳􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶷􏶾я􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶿􏶯􏶷􏶾􏶮􏶯􏶬􏶻􏶮􏶭􏶬я􏶴􏶮 (2014—2020 􏶿.) 􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶷􏶴􏷀я􏶱􏶮 􏶱􏶮 Р􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶮􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 (ЕО) No 1927/2006 (ОВ L 347, 20.12.2013 􏶿., 􏶳􏶴p. 
(13) Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (2014-2020) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p.
855). 
855).
М􏶷􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶷􏶶􏶬􏶱􏶿􏶺􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶳􏶵􏶲􏶮 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶼я􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶲􏶯􏶷􏶽􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶰􏶳􏷄􏶶􏶳􏶬, 􏶵􏶶􏶮􏶹􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶼􏷄􏶵􏶴􏶬, 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶬 􏶲􏶺􏶻􏶼􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 (􏶲􏶽. 􏶴􏶮􏶾􏶯􏶬􏶭􏶮 3.1). 
Performance monitoring requires keeping track of programme inputs, outputs, results and impacts (see Table 3.1).
49 􏶷􏶴 Н􏶮􏶳􏶷􏶵􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶷-􏶼􏶷􏶾􏶶􏶷 􏶶􏶰􏶿􏷄􏶯􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶰 (SWD(2017) 350 􏶷􏶵􏶷􏶱􏷅􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶱). 
49 of the ‘Better Regulation Guidelines’ (SWD(2017) 350 final).
И􏶻􏶴􏶷􏷅􏶱􏶬􏶵: ЕСП. 3.23. 
Source: ECA 3.23.
А􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏶻􏶺􏶴 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶲􏶮, 􏷅􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶲􏶰􏷅􏶰 􏶷􏶴 60 % 􏶷􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰, 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬, 􏶳􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶲􏶯􏶷􏶽􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶰􏶳􏷄􏶶􏶳􏶬 􏶬􏶯􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶵􏶶􏶮􏶹􏶱􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶼􏷄􏶵􏶴􏶬 (14) (􏶲􏶽. 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.9). 
Our analysis shows that more than 60 % of the indicators included in the programme statements were input or output indicators (14) (see Box 3.9).
Т􏶷􏶻􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶲􏶰􏶳 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶻􏶮 􏶲􏶯􏶷􏶽􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶶􏶰􏶳􏷄􏶶􏶳􏶬 􏶬 􏶵􏶶􏶮􏶹􏶱􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶼􏷄􏶵􏶴􏶬 􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬􏷅􏶮􏶲􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶻􏶮 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶮 􏶲 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 (15). 
This predominance of input and output indicators limits the usefulness of the information provided on progress in achieving objectives (15).
Ня􏶵􏶷􏶬 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰 􏶱􏶰 􏶳􏶮 􏶸􏶶я􏶵􏶷 􏶳􏶲􏶺􏶶􏶻􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶳 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 ЕС 3.24. 
Some performance indicators were not clearly linked to EU spending 3.24.
Е􏶼􏶱􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶷􏶲􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶫􏷄􏶱􏶵􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶰 􏶼􏶮 „􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲я􏶴 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶻􏶮 􏶲􏶳я􏶵􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 (...) 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶸􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 (...) 􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶱􏶷􏶳 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶬􏶵􏶬 􏶬 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶱􏶮 С􏶺ю􏶻􏶮“ (16). 
One of the key functions of programme statements is to ‘provide information for each of the spending programmes on (...) progress on programme performance (...) and contribution to the main EU policies and objectives’ (16).
Т􏶮􏶻􏶬 􏶭􏶰􏶯 􏶳􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮 􏶱􏶮􏶹-􏶼􏶷􏶾􏶶􏶰 􏷅􏶶􏶰􏶻 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶬 􏶲􏶺􏶻􏶼􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶬􏶰, 􏶵􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶷 􏶳􏶮 􏶴я􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶳􏶲􏶺􏶶􏶻􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶳 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶬 􏷀􏶷􏶿􏶮􏶴 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶮􏶴 􏶳􏶰􏶶􏶬􏶷􏶻􏶱􏶷 􏶻􏶮􏶳􏶰􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶷􏶴 􏶲􏶺􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶮 􏶱􏶮 ЕС (17). 
This aim is best achieved through results and impact indicators that are closely linked to the programme objectives and can be meaningfully affected by the EU programme in question (17).
(16) COM(2018)600,􏷀􏶮􏶹2018􏶿.:П􏶶􏶷􏶰􏶵􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶷􏶾􏷆􏶾ю􏶼􏶽􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я􏶳􏶺ю􏶻􏶻􏶮􏶫􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶮2019—Р􏶮􏶾􏶷􏶴􏶰􏶱􏶼􏶷􏶵􏷄􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴—Ч􏶮􏶳􏶴I—П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶲􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬, 􏶳􏶴􏶶. 
(16) COM(2018) 600 - May 2018: Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019; Working Document Part 1, programme statements of operational expenditure, p.
(17) К􏶺􏶼􏶰􏶴􏶷􏶴􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶰􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶯􏶷􏶽􏶬􏷀􏶷,􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶷􏶬􏶷􏶴􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶼􏶶􏷄􏶽􏶮􏶲􏶮􏷆􏶮􏶴􏶮􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶬􏶵􏶮,􏶵􏶷я􏶴􏶷􏶱􏶰􏶰􏶳􏶲􏶺􏶶􏶻􏶮􏶱􏶮􏶳􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶴􏶰(􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶬􏷀􏶰􏶶􏷅􏶶􏶰􏶻􏶶􏶰􏶿􏶯􏶮􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶱􏶮ЕС). 
(17) Whererelevant,alsobytheaccompanyingnon-spendingpolicy(e.g.throughEUregulation).
C 340/66 О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 8.10.2019 􏶿. 3.25. 
C 340/66 Official Journal of the European Union 8.10.2019 EN 3.25.
С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏷄􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶱􏶷􏶲􏶬 􏶳􏶯􏷄􏷅􏶮􏶬, 􏶲 􏶵􏶷􏶬􏶴􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶱я􏷀􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏷅􏶴􏶬 􏶱􏶬􏶵􏶮􏶵􏶲􏶮 􏶲􏶶􏶺􏶻􏶵􏶮 􏶳 􏶰􏶫􏶰􏶵􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶮 ЕС (􏶲􏶽. 􏶴􏶮􏶾􏶯􏶬􏶭􏶮 3.2). 
We found cases where the indicators used were almost completely irrelevant to the effects of EU spending (see Table 3.2).
В 􏶱я􏶵􏶷􏶬 􏶳􏶯􏷄􏷅􏶮􏶬 􏶲 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶼􏶷􏶶􏶬 􏶳􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶼􏷅􏶰􏶶􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶮 􏶫􏶮􏶵􏶴􏶺􏶴, 􏷅􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶱􏶰 􏶻􏶮􏶳я􏶿􏶮􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 (18). 
In certain cases, the programme statements even highlighted the fact that the programmes did not affect the indicators (18).
П􏶶􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶱􏶴 􏶱􏶮 􏶶􏶮􏶻􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶴􏶰 (ЕФГЗ + ЕЗФРСР) 􏶳􏶺􏶳 􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶳􏶴􏶬􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶵􏶬 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶬􏶯􏶬 100 % 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶲􏶰􏶶􏶵􏶬. 
Percentage of expenditure (EAGF+EAFRD) with statistics or 100 % check.
П􏶶􏶷􏶿􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶼􏶰􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶶􏶮􏶭􏶬􏶬 􏶬􏷀􏶮􏶴 􏶹􏶰􏶶􏶮􏶶􏷇􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶶􏷄􏶵􏶴􏷄􏶶􏶮, 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶳􏶮 􏶷􏶶􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶶􏶮􏶱􏶬 􏶱􏶮 􏶼􏶲􏶰 􏶱􏶬􏶲􏶮: „􏶷􏶾􏷆􏶬 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬“ 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷-􏶲􏶬􏶳􏶷􏶵􏶷 􏶱􏶬􏶲􏶷 􏶬 „􏶳􏶸􏶰􏶭􏶬􏶫􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬“ 􏶱􏶮 􏶸􏶷-􏶱􏶬􏶳􏶵􏶷 􏶱􏶬􏶲􏶷 (19). 
Programme statements have a hierarchical structure, with objectives organised into two tiers: higher level ‘general objectives’ and lower level ‘specific objectives’ (19).
3.27. 
3.27.
8.10.2019 􏶿. О􏶫􏶬􏶭􏶬􏶮􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶵 􏶱􏶮 Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я 􏶳􏶺ю􏶻 C 340/67 BG Н􏶰􏶲􏶺􏶻􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶱􏶷 􏶰 􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶬 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶺􏶴 􏶸􏶷 􏷀􏶱􏶷􏶿􏶷 􏶷􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 3.28. 
8.10.2019 Official Journal of the European Union C 340/67 EN Progress could not be calculated for many indicators 3.28.
К􏶮􏶵􏶴􏶷 􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶱􏶷 􏶲 􏶵􏶮􏶶􏶰 3.10 􏶸􏶷-􏶼􏶷􏶯􏷄 􏶷􏶾􏶮􏷅􏶰, 􏶴􏶮􏶵􏶬􏶲􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶱􏶴􏶬 􏶰 􏶱􏶰􏶲􏶺􏶻􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶱􏶷 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶮􏶴 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏶸􏶷􏷅􏶴􏶬 􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶷􏶲􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶲 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶼􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶱􏶮 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 (44 %) 􏶱􏶮􏶹-􏶲􏶰􏷅􏶰 􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶮􏶼􏶬 􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶼􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏷅􏶬􏶱􏶬: — 􏶯􏶬􏶸􏶳􏶲􏶮 􏶵􏶷􏶱􏶵􏶶􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮 􏶵􏶷􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 (􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶. 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶰 􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶮 􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 „􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏷄􏶲􏶰􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶬“, „􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏶻􏶮􏶸􏶮􏶻􏶬“ 􏶬 􏶴.􏶱.); 􏶬/􏶬􏶯􏶬 — 􏶱􏶰􏶰􏶻􏶮􏶼􏶮􏶼􏶰􏶱􏶮􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴; — 􏶯􏶬􏶸􏶳􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬􏶻􏶮􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬я􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵; — 􏶾􏶮􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴,􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬я􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶬􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮􏶳􏶴􏶷􏶹􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶰􏶳􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶳􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶲􏶰􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶬􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶴. 
In section A, we presented our progress percentages for the various MFF headings. However, as shown in Box 3.10 below, it was impossible to calculate this percentage for almost half the indicators in our sample (44 %), mainly because: — therewaseithernospecific,quantifiedtarget(e.g.,targetdefinedas‘toincrease’,‘tomaintain’,etc.);and/or — thebaselinevaluewasnotgiven; — therewasnodataavailableonprogressachieved; — baseline,dataonprogressachievedandtargetwerenotpresentedinthesameformat.
З􏶮 ФСЕС 􏶬􏷀􏶮 􏶳􏶮􏷀􏶷 􏶰􏶼􏶬􏶱 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯 (20), 􏶻􏶮 􏶵􏶷􏶹􏶴􏶷 􏶿􏶷􏶯я􏷀􏶷􏶴􏶷 􏶵􏶷􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶷 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶱􏶬 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 􏶱􏶰 􏶼􏶮􏶲􏶮 􏶲􏶺􏶻􏷀􏶷􏶽􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶼􏶮 􏶾􏶺􏶼􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏷅􏶬􏶳􏶯􏶰􏶱 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵􏶺􏶴. 
For the EUSF, there was only one indicator (20) for which the large quantity of data available did not enable progress calculation.
3.30. 
3.30.
К􏶷􏶿􏶮􏶴􏶷 􏶳􏶮 􏶾􏶬􏶯􏶬 􏶷􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶰􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶰􏶴􏶮􏶸􏶱􏶬 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬, К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 􏶰 􏶬􏶻􏶶􏶮􏶻􏶬􏶯􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏶰􏶶􏶲􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶷􏶯􏶻􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶬􏷀 (21), 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶷 С􏷀􏶰􏶴􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶮􏶯􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶿􏶬 􏶳􏷅􏶬􏶴􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶲􏶮􏶽􏶱􏶬 􏶻􏶮 􏷀􏶷􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶷􏶶􏶬􏶱􏶿􏶮 􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷. 
Annual milestones were frequently missing. Where milestones were available, the Commission had reservations about their use (21), whereas we consider them important for performance monitoring.
(20) „Б􏶶􏶷􏶹 􏶱􏶮 􏷇􏶷􏶶􏶮􏶴􏶮, 􏶸􏶷􏶼􏶸􏶷􏷀􏶷􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶬 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶷􏶼􏶷􏶯я􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶱􏶮 􏶵􏶶􏶬􏶻􏶬􏶳􏶱􏶮 􏶳􏶬􏶴􏷄􏶮􏶭􏶬я, 􏶲 􏶵􏶷я􏶴􏶷 􏶳􏶮 􏶻􏶮􏶳􏶰􏶿􏶱􏶮􏶴􏶬 􏷄􏶳􏶯􏶷􏶲􏶬я􏶴􏶮 􏶬􏷀 􏶱􏶮 􏶽􏶬􏶲􏶷􏶴“. 
(20) The “Number of population helped in overcoming a crisis situation where their living conditions have been affected”.
Тя 􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶷 􏶴􏶮􏶵􏶮 􏶻􏶮􏶾􏶰􏶯я􏶻􏶮, 􏷅􏶰 􏶱я􏶵􏶷􏶬 􏶸􏶷􏶵􏶮􏶻􏶮􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶬 􏶳􏶮 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶰􏶱􏶬 􏶲 􏶶􏶮􏷀􏶵􏶮􏶴􏶮 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷, 􏶲􏶺􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶵􏶬 􏶬􏶻􏶲􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶱􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶾􏶯􏶰􏷀􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶱􏶮􏶯􏶬􏷅􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶼􏶮􏶱􏶱􏶬 (22). 
We also noted that the performance framework included certain indicators despite known problems concerning the availability of data (22).
3.32. 
3.32.
В 􏶳􏶲􏶷я􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶸􏶷􏶶􏶺􏶵􏶮 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶷􏶳􏶲􏶷􏶾􏶷􏶽􏶼􏶮􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶷􏶴 􏶷􏶴􏶿􏶷􏶲􏶷􏶶􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶻􏶮 􏶫􏶬􏶱􏶮􏶱􏶳􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶴􏶮 2017 􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏶱􏶮 С􏶺􏶲􏶰􏶴􏶺􏶴 􏶸􏶷􏶼􏷅􏶰􏶶􏶴􏶮􏶲􏶮 􏶱􏶰􏶷􏶾􏷇􏶷􏶼􏶬􏷀􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶴􏶮 􏶼􏶮 􏶳􏶰 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶲􏶮 „􏶮􏶵􏶴􏷄􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶻􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶷􏶴 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶸􏶶􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏷅􏶬􏶴􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶷􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶬я 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰“ (23). П􏶷 􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶬я 􏶱􏶮􏷅􏶬􏶱 􏶲 􏶳􏶲􏶷я􏶴􏶮 􏶸􏶶􏶷􏶭􏶰􏶼􏷄􏶶􏶮 􏶻􏶮 􏶷􏶳􏶲􏶷􏶾􏶷􏶽􏶼􏶮􏶲􏶮􏶱􏶰 􏶷􏶴 􏶷􏶴􏶿􏶷􏶲􏶷􏶶􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶴 􏶻􏶮 2017 􏶿. Е􏶲􏶶􏶷􏶸􏶰􏶹􏶳􏶵􏶬я􏶴 􏶸􏶮􏶶􏶯􏶮􏷀􏶰􏶱􏶴 􏶸􏶶􏶬􏶻􏶷􏶲􏶮􏶲􏶮 К􏶷􏷀􏶬􏶳􏶬я􏶴􏶮 „􏶼􏶮 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶲􏶮 􏶮􏶵􏶴􏷄􏶮􏶯􏶱􏶮 􏶬􏶱􏶫􏶷􏶶􏷀􏶮􏶭􏶬я 􏶸􏶶􏶬 􏶷􏶴􏷅􏶬􏶴􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶶􏶰􏶻􏷄􏶯􏶴􏶮􏶴􏶬􏶴􏶰 􏶷􏶴 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷, 􏶲􏶵􏶯ю􏷅􏶬􏶴􏶰􏶯􏶱􏶷 􏶲 􏶿􏶷􏶼􏶬􏷃􏶱􏶬я 􏶼􏶷􏶵􏶯􏶮􏶼 􏶻􏶮 􏷄􏶸􏶶􏶮􏶲􏶯􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶬 􏶬􏶻􏶸􏶺􏶯􏶱􏶰􏶱􏶬􏶰􏶴􏶷, 􏶷􏶴􏶱􏶷􏶳􏶱􏶷 􏶷􏶳􏶺􏷆􏶰􏶳􏶴􏶲􏶰􏶱􏶬я 􏶱􏶮􏶸􏶶􏶰􏶼􏶺􏶵 􏶵􏶺􏷀 􏶸􏶷􏶳􏶴􏶬􏶿􏶮􏶱􏶰􏶴􏶷 􏶱􏶮 􏶭􏶰􏶯􏶬􏶴􏶰...“ (24). 
In its recommendation on the discharge for the financial year 2017, the Council underlined the ‘need to include up-to-date performance information in performance reporting on progress made towards achieving targets’ (23). Similarly, the European Parliament in its 2017 discharge called on the Commission to ‘include up-to-date performance information in performance reporting, including in the AMPR, on progress made towards achieving targets...’ (24).