natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Комисията допълнително ще подобри начина, по който се опитва да използва синергиите между своите интервенции, като започне с текущия преглед на здравните насоки. 
The Commission will further improve the way in which it seeks to exploit synergies between its interventions, starting with the ongoing review of health guidance.
С оглед подкрепа на изпълнението на секторните програми, през 2007 г. Комисията актуализира своите насоки от 2003 г. относно подкрепата на ЕК за секторни програми и организира цяла поредица от обучения, свързани с този метод за изпълнение. 
To support the implementation of sectoral programmes, the Commission in 2007 updated its 2003 guidelines on EC support to sector programmes and organised a whole series of trainings related to this implementation modality.
Тя също така постави началото и управлява заедно с Дания и Нидерландия съвместната учебна програма за секторни подходи, високо оценена от донорската общност инициатива. 
It has also launched and managed together with Denmark and the Netherlands the joint learning programme on sector-wide approaches, an initiative highly regarded by the donor community.
Комисията ще продължи да подпомага създаването и изпълнението на секторни програми, пряко в страните, където здравеопазването е част от нейната стратегия за сътрудничество, и непряко чрез оценяване на изпълнението на ОБП и процеси на съвместни прегледи на други места. 
The Commission will continue to support the establishment and implementation of sector programmes, directly in the countries where health is part of its cooperation strategy, and indirectly through GBS performance assessment and joint review processes elsewhere.
81 ПРЕПОРЪКИ ОТНОСНО СЪГЛАСУВАНО ИЗПОЛЗВАНЕ НА ИНСТРУМЕНТИ No 10 a): В контекста на натрупването на опит, Комисията ще оцени дали е налице необходимост от преразглеждане на показателите, които понастоящем се съдържат в насоките на Комисията за програмиране на ОБП и СБП, относно кога да се използват ОБП и СБП и как най-добре да се съчетават двете. б) Насоките за специфичното използване на различни инструменти във връзка със здравния сектор (включително проекти), както и тяхното използване в комбинация, ще бъдат преразгледани в „програмни насоки за здравеопазването“, които понастоящем се актуализират, така че по-добре да вземат под внимание по-широките развития на инструментите на ЕК (например договора относно ЦХР). в) Новата междуведомствена група на Комисията за сътрудничество с Глобалния фонд ще потърси начини за постигане на по-добро допълване с Глобалния фонд, като се вземат предвид въпроси по отношение на предвидимостта във връзка с операции на Глобалния фонд и различните времеви рамки за операции на Комисията и Глобалния фонд. 
Special Report No 10/2008 — EC development assistance to the health services in sub-Saharan Africa RECOMMENDATIONS ON COHERENT USE OF INSTRUMENTS No 10 (a): In the light of accumulating experience, the Commission will assess whether there is need to review the indications about when to use GBS and SBS, and how best to use the two together, which are currently contained in the Commission’s guidelines for programming, GBS and SBS. (b) The guidance on the specific use of the various instruments in relation to the health sector (including projects), as well as on their use in combination, will be reviewed in the ‘health programming guidelines’ which are currently being updated to better take into account broader developments of EC instruments (e.g. MDG Contract). (c) The Commission’s new Interservice group on cooperation with the Global Fund will address ways to achieve greater complementarity with Global Fund taking into account predictability issues in relation to Global Fund operations and the different timeframes for Commission and Global Fund operations.
No 11: Комисията се е ангажирала да използва СБП като предпочитания от нея метод за осъществяване на интервенции в здравеопазването при съответните условия, като например наличието на добре изготвена секторна политика. 
No 11: The Commission is committed to use SBS as its preferred implementation modality for health interventions whenever conditions such as, among the others, the existence of a well-defined sector policy.
No 12: ЕК ще продължи да подкрепя пряко създаването и изпълнението на секторни програми в страните, в които здравеопазването е част от нейната стратегия за сътрудничество, и непряко чрез оценяване на изпълнението на ОБП и процеси на съвместни прегледи в останалите страни. 
No 12: The EC will continue to support the establishment and implementation of sector programmes, directly in the countries where health is part of its cooperation strategy, and indirectly through GBS performance assessment and joint review processes elsewhere.
Европейска Сметна Палата Специален доклад No 10/2008 г. Помощ за развитие, предоставяна от ЕО за здравни услуги в държавите от Субсахарска Африка Люксембург: Служба за официални публикации на Европейските общности 2009 г. — 81 стр. — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-111-0 doi: 10.2865/28708 
European Court of Auditors Special Report No 10/2008 EC development assistance to health services in sub-Saharan Africa Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2009 — 80 pp. — 21 × 29,7 cm ISBN 978-92-9207-095-3 doi: 10.2865/21515
За да получите координатите им, посетете следния адрес: http://ec.europa.eu/ или изпратете факс на следния номер: +352 2929-42758. 
You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758.
ЕВРОПЕЙСКА СМЕТНА ПАЛАТА ISBN 978-92-9207-111-0 QJ-AB-08-010-BG-C 
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS ISBN 978-92-9207-095-3 QJ-AB-08-010-EN-C
Īpašais ziņojums Nr. 11 2008 EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS ATBALSTA PĀRVALDĪBA SAISTĪBĀ AR LABĪBAS INTERVENCES KRĀJUMU GLABĀŠANAS DARBĪBĀM (saskaņā ar EK līguma 248. panta 4. punkta otro daļu) EIROPAS REVĪZIJAS PALĀTA 
Special Report No 11 2008 THE MANAGEMENT OF THE EU SUPPORT FOR THE PUBLIC STORAGE OPERATIONS OF CEREALS (pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 248(4) of the EC Treaty) EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS
2 EIROPAS REVĪZIJAS PALĀTA 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi L-1615 Luxembourg Tālrunis (352) 4398 45410 Fakss (352) 4398 46430 E-pasts: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internets: http://www.eca.europa.eu Īpašais ziņojums Nr. 11 2008 Liela daļa papildu informācijas par Eiropas Savienību ir pieejama internetā. 
2 EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi L-1615 Luxembourg Tel. (352) 43 98-45410 Fax (352) 43 98-46430 E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu Internet: http://www.eca.europa.eu Special Report No 11 2008 More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).
Kataloga dati ir atrodami šīs publikācijas beigās. 
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication.
Luksemburga: Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālo publikāciju birojs, 2009. gads. ISBN 978-92-9207-035-9 DOI 10.2865/65027 © Eiropas Kopienas, 2009. gads. 
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2009 ISBN 978-92-9207-027-4 DOI 10.2865/57636 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
SATURS Punkts IIX KOPSAVILKUMS 112 IEVADS 17 VISPĀRĪGA INFORMĀCIJA 812 PĀRVALDĪBAS SISTĒMU PĀRSKATS 1316 REVĪZIJAS TVĒRUMS UN PIEEJA 1743 APSVĒRUMI 1733 VAI SAIMNIECISKĀ DARBĪBA SAISTĪBĀ AR LABĪBAS INTERVENCES KRĀJUMU GLABĀŠANU BIJA LABI PĀRVALDĪTA? 18 LABĪBAS PIEŅEMŠANA GLABĀŠANĀ 19 UZGLABĀŠANĀ ESOŠĀS LABĪBAS FIZISKĀ DROŠĪBA 2029 UZGLABĀŠANĀ ESOŠĀS LABĪBAS REALIZĀCIJA 3033 IZVAIRĪŠANĀS NO STRUKTURĀLAS UZKRĀŠANAS 3443 VAI KOMISIJAS PROCEDŪRAS NODROŠINA, KA ES IZMAKSAS IR SAMAZINĀTAS LĪDZ MINIMUMAM? 3638 TEHNISKĀS IZMAKSAS 3940 IZMAKSAS SAISTĪBĀ AR VĒRTĪBAS SAMAZINĀŠANOS 4143 FINANSĒŠANAS IZMAKSAS 4454 SECINĀJUMI UN IETEIKUMI I PIELIKUMS  VALSTS REZERVĒ ESOŠĀS LABĪBAS DAUDZUMS FINANŠU GADA BEIGĀS 30. 
CONTENTS Paragraph IIX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 112 INTRODUCTION 17 BACKGROUND 812 OVERVIEW OF THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 1316 AUDIT SCOPE AND APPROACH 1743 OBSERVATIONS 1733 HAVE THE PHYSICAL OPERATIONS OF THE PUBLIC STORAGE OF CEREALS BEEN WELL MANAGED? 18 THE ACCEPTANCE OF CEREALS INTO STORAGE 19 THE PHYSICAL SAFEGUARD OF CEREALS IN STORAGE 2029 THE DISPOSAL OF CEREALS IN STORAGE 3033 THE AVOIDANCE OF STRUCTURAL STORAGE 3443 DO THE COMMISSION’S PROCEDURES ENSURE THAT THE COSTS INCURRED BY THE EU ARE MINIMISED? 3638 TECHNICAL COSTS 3940 DEPRECIATION COSTS 4143 FINANCING COSTS 4454 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEX I  QUANTITIES OF CEREALS IN PUBLIC STORAGE AT THE FINANCIAL YEAR END 30 SEPTEMBER ANNEX II  EXPENDITURE FOR THE INTERVENTION STORAGE OF CEREALS BY TYPE OF COST ANNEX III  DETAILS OF THE COMPUTATION OF THE EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC STORAGE OPERATIONS THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES
KOPSAVILKUMS I. Lauksaimniecības produktu intervences uzglabāšanas mērķis ir stabilizēt tirgus un nodrošināt pietiekami augstu dzīves līmeni lauksaimnie-cībā nodarbinātajiem iedzīvotājiem. 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. The objective of public storage of agricultural products is to stabilise the markets and ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community.
Dalībvalstis iepērk produktus par Padomes noteiktu intervences cenu, kas balstīta uz Komisijas ierosināto cenu, un uzglabā, līdz tos var pārdot, neapdraudot ES tirgu cenas. 
Member States buy in the products at the intervention price set by the Council based on a proposal from the Commission and keep them in storage until they can be sold without undermining prices on the EU markets.
Labības intervences krājumi pēdējā laikā ir samazinājušies ievērojama tirgus cenu pie-auguma dēļ. 
The stocks of cereals in storage have been decreasing recently due to a significant increase in market prices.
Krājumu līmenis nākotnē ir atka-rīgs arī no daudziem citiem faktoriem, tostarp klimatiskajiem apstākļiem un politiskajiem lēmumiem, kas pieņemti saistībā ar 2008. gadā Komisijas veikto “Veselības pārbaudi”. 
Future levels also depend upon many other factors, such as climatic conditions and the policy decisions taken in the context of the Commission’s 2008 ‘health check’.
Palāta revidēja Eiropas Savienības atbalsta ekonomiskumu labības intervences krājumu glabāšanai un jo īpaši to, cik lielā mērā ir samazinātas izmaksas un palielināti ieņēmumi. 
The Court audited the economy of the European Union support for the public storage operations of cereals, and in particular the extent to which costs have been minimised and revenue maximised.
To veica, pārbaudot datus Komisijā un divās dalībvalstīs, kurās bija vislielākie krājumi. 
This was based on a review of the data at the Commission and the two Member States with the largest stocks.
Uz vietas pārbaudīja apstākļus un 18 labības partiju parauga kvalitāti 11 glabātavās. 
The conditions and quality of a sample of 18 cereal lots in 11 stores were checked on-the-spot.
Palāta konstatēja, ka ir pareizi piemērotas procedūras, kas nodrošina, ka iepirktā labība atbilst kvalitātes prasībām un tiek pienācīgi glabāta. 
The Court found that the procedures that ensure that cereals bought in are of the required quality and stored appropriately are correctly applied.
V. Procedūras, ar kurām saskaņā realizē valsts rezervju krājumus, ne vienmēr nodrošina, ka intervences tīrās izmaksas ir samazinātas līdz minimumam vai ka krājumi atrodas glabāšanā ne ilgāk kā vajadzīgs. 
V. The procedures followed for the disposal of stocks in storage do not always ensure that the net costs of intervention are minimised or that stocks remain in storage no longer than necessary.
Palāta iesaka a) ņemt vērā attiecīgās labības kvalitāti un atrašanās vietu, nosakot minimālo pārdošanas cenu; KOPSAVILKUMS VII. 
The Court recommends that: (a) the minimum sales price set should take the quality and location of the cereals into account; (b) when market conditions allow: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VII.
Maksājumi dalībvalstīm par labības uzglabāšanu ir balstīti uz Komisijai paziņotajiem datiem. 
Payments to Member States for the storage of cereals are based on data communicated to the Commission.
Tā kā šīs summas ir ievērojamas, Komisijai ir jāpa-stiprina pārbaudes procedūras un jāievieš datu pārbaudes uz vietas. 
Given the significance of the amounts involved, the Commission should strengthen its review procedures and introduce on-the-spot checks of the data.
Dalībvalstīm atmaksājamo atlīdzību aprēķinam izmantotā metode galvenokārt nodrošina to, lai atlīdzības nepārsniegtu pakārtotās izmaksas un lai dalībvalstis būtu motivētas uzturēt zemas izmaksas. 
The method of calculation of reimbursements to Member States generally ensures that they do not exceed the underlying costs and that Member States have an incentive to maintain costs low.
Tomēr Komisijai ir jāpārskata standarta izmaksas darbībām bez krājumu pārvietošanas. 
However, the Commission should review its standard costs for operations without movement.
Turklāt ir jāpārskata likmes, kuras izmanto finansēšanas izmaksu aprēķinā, lai mudinātu dalībvalstis sniegt informāciju par savām faktiskajām finansēšanas izmaksām un līdz minimumam samazinātu pārmērīgas kompensācijas risku. 
Furthermore, the rates used for the calculation of financing costs should be reviewed to encourage Member States to provide their actual financing costs and reduce the risk of overcompensation to a minimum.
Kaut arī Palātas ieteiktajiem uzlabojumiem ir ierobežota finansiāla ietekme pašreizējā spē-cīgā tirgus gadījumā, tie varētu nozīmīgi ietekmēt ES budžetu, ja labības krājumi nākotnē atkal palielināsies. 
While the improvements recommended by the Court have limited financial impact in the current strong market situation, potentially they could have a significant impact on the EU budget if cereal stocks increase again in the future.
Turklāt šie uzlabojumi varētu ietekmēt citus intervences uzglabāšanas pasākumus. 
Furthermore, they could impact on other intervention storage measures.
Tāpēc Palāta stingri iesaka ieviest šos uzlabojumus pēc iespējas ātrāk. b) VI. ja tirgus apstākļi to ļauj, i) ii) labību nevajadzētu piedāvāt eksportam, ja iekšējā tirgū var saņemt augstāku cenu, vajadzētu pieņemt nedaudz zemākus piedāvājumus, ja guvums ir lielāks nekā turpmākās uzglabāšanas izmaksas. 
Therefore, the Court strongly recommends implementing these improvements at the earliest possible date. (i) (ii) VI. cereals should not be offered for export if a higher price can be obtained on the internal market; and marginally lower offers should be accepted if this is more than offset by their future storage costs.
Budžeta procesa caurskatāmību varētu uzla-bot, parādot visus izmaksu elementus tādiem pasākumiem, kas nav tieši saistīti ar labības intervences uzglabāšanas mērķiem, piemēram, atbalstam vistrūcīgākajiem iedzīvotājiem vai bioetanola ražošanai. 
The transparency of the budgetary process could be improved by identifying all the cost elements of any activities which are not directly related to the objectives of the intervention storage of cereals, such as the support of the most deprived persons or of the bioethanol industry.
IEVADS VISPĀRĪGA INFORMĀCIJA 1. 
INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND 1.
Lauksaimniecības produktu intervences uzglabāšanas mērķis ir nostabilizēt attiecīgos tirgus un nodrošināt pietiekami augstu dzīves līmeni lauksaim-niecībā nodarbinātajiem iedzīvotājiem1. 
The objective of public storage of agricultural products is to stabilise the related markets and ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community1.
Kad tirgus cenas ir zemas, dalībvalstis (saskaņā ar zināmiem nosacījumiem) iepērk ražotāju vai starpnieku piedāvātos produktus par intervences cenu, kuru noteikusi Padome, pamatojoties uz Komisijas priekšlikumu. 
When market prices are low, Member States buy in the products (subject to certain conditions) offered by producers or intermediaries at the intervention price that is set by the Council based on a proposal from the Commission.
Produktus uzglabā, līdz tos realizē iekšējā tirgū, ja cenas kāpj, vai arī eksportē. 
They are kept in storage until disposal either to the internal market when prices rise or for export.
Komisija dalībvalstīm atlīdzina uzglabāšanas izmaksas (uzglabāšanas nolik-tavā un finansēšanas izmaksas) un daļu no iepirkto produktu sākotnējās iegādes vērtības kā tā sauktās amortizācijas izmaksas. 
The Commission refunds to Member States the cost of storage (warehousing and financing costs) and part of the initial purchase cost of bought-in produce through so-called ‘depreciation’.
Realizācijas tīros ieņēmumus (no ieņēmumiem atskaita sākotnējās izmaksas, veicot amortizācijas korekciju) ieskaita Kopienas budžetā. 
Net proceeds (proceeds less initial cost, adjusted for depreciation) on disposal are credited to the Community budget.
Pasargājot ražotājus no cenu samazināšanās, intervences pasākums darbojas kā “drošības tīkls”. 
By protecting producers from reduced prices, the intervention measure acts as a safety net.
Tomēr intervence nedrīkst izkropļot tirgu, sistemātiski veicinot pārprodukciju vai izraisot strukturālu krājumu veidošanu. 
However, it should not distort markets by encouraging consistent over-production or cause a structural build-up of stocks.
Labības intervences politika darbojas kopš 1962. gada, kad Padome to izvei-doja kā instrumentu tirgus kopīgai organizācijai. 
The intervention policy for cereals dates back to 1962, when the Council established it as an instrument of the common organisation of the market.
I un II pielikumā parādīts valsts rezervēs esošās labības daudzums un izmaksas kopš 2000. gada. 
Annexes I and II show the quantities and cost of cereals in public storage since 2000.
Rudzu daudzums rezervēs ir samazinājies pēc to intervences atcelšanas 2003. gadā. 
The quantity of rye in storage declined following the abolition of its intervention in 2003.
Citas labības daudzums strauji pieauga 2005. gadā pēc labas ražas un desmit jaunu dalībvalstu pievienošanās, taču arvien pieaugošo tirgus cenu dēļ intervence nav bijusi vajadzīga, un bija iespējams pārdot esošos krājumus. 
The quantity of other cereals increased sharply in 2005 following a good harvest and the entry of the 10 new Member States, but the steadily increasing market prices have negated the need for intervention and allowed existing stocks to be sold.
Tāpēc 2008. gada jūnijā krājumi bija praktiski izsmelti. 
As a result, stocks were virtually nil by June 2008.
Valsts rezervju izmaksām ir bijusi līdzīga tendence. 
The cost of public storage has followed a similar pattern.
1 Padomes Regula (EK) Nr. 1784/2003 (OV L 270, 21.10.2003., 78. lpp.), kas atcelta ar Regulu (EK) Nr. 1234/2007 (OV L 299, 16.11.2007., 1. lpp.). 
1 Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p.
Tirgus cenu un intervences krājumu nākotnes tendences ir atkarīgas no vairākiem faktoriem, tostarp klimatiskajiem apstākļiem un pasaules piepra-sījuma, ko ir grūti prognozēt. 
Future trends of market prices and intervention stocks depend upon numerous factors, such as climatic conditions and world demand, which are difficult to forecast.
Kaut arī nav paredzams, ka krājumi atkal palielināsies īstermiņā, iespējams, ka tas notiks nākotnē. 
While the stocks are not expected to increase again in the short term, this remains a possibility for the future.
Tāpēc patlaban notiekošā lauksaimniecības politikas “veselības pārbaude” ietver Komisijas priekšlikumus paturēt valsts intervenci vismaz galvenajiem graudaugiem (parastajiem kviešiem) un atsevišķiem citiem produktiem, lai saglabātu “drošības tīklu” tirgus traucējumu gadījumā2. 
In this respect the ongoing ‘health check’ on agricultural policy includes proposals by the Commission to maintain public intervention for at least the major cereal (bread wheat) and certain other products in order to maintain a safety-net support in case of market disruptions2.
Padome apsprieda arī jau-tājumu par “stratēģisko krājumu” izveidi pārtikas drošības nolūkā3. 
Another issue discussed by the Council was the constitution of “strategic stocks” in the interest of food security3.
Atsevišķus Palātas konstatējumus par realizācijas politiku un izmaksām var attiecināt uz citiem produktiem (piemēram, sviestu, sausā vājpiena pul-veri, alkoholu, liellopu gaļu, neiesaiņoto cukuru un iesaiņoto cukuru), jo uz tiem attiecas tā pati regula4 un pārvaldības sistēmas. 
Certain of the Court’s findings on disposal policy and costs may apply to other products (such as butter, skimmed milk powder, alcohol, beef and veal, bulk sugar and packaged sugar), as they are subject to the same regulation4 and management systems.
Palāta īpašajā ziņojumā 1988. gadā5 jau ir pievērsusies lauksaimniecības produktu glabāšanai valsts rezervē. Šajā ziņojumā bija apskatīta ar glabāšanu valsts rezervē saistīto izdevumu grāmatvedības uzskaite, kā arī krājumu kvantitātes un kvalitātes pārbaudes. 
The Court has previously reported on public storage of agricultural products in a special report in 19885 that focused on the accounting of public storage expenditure as well as checks on the quantity and quality of stocks.
Īpašajā ziņojumā 1999. gadā6 bija aprakstīta 1992. gada KLP reformas ietekme uz graudaugu sektoru. 
A special report in 19996 dealt with the impact of the 1992 CAP reform on the cereals sector.
2 COM(2007) 722 galīgā redakcija, 2007. gada 20. novembrī, kā arī COM(2008) 306 galīgā redakcija, 2008. gada 20. maijā. 
2 COM(2007) 722 final of 20 November 2007, followed by COM(2008) 306 final of 20 May 2008.
3 Lauksaimniecības un zivsaimniecības padome, Padomes 2834. sanāksme, Brisele, 2007. gada 26.–27. novembris (Preses paziņojums 15333/07 (Presse 264)). 
3 Agriculture and Fisheries Council, 2834th Council meeting, Brussels 26-27 November 2007 (15333/07 (Presse 264)).
4 Komisijas Regula (EK) Nr. 884/2006 (OV L 171, 23.6.2006., 35. lpp.). 
4 Commission Regulation (EC) No 884/2006 (OJ L 171, 23.6.2006, p. 35).
5 Revīzijas palātas Īpašais ziņojums Nr. 5/88 par valsts rezerves pārvaldību un kontroli (OV C 274, 24.10.1988.). 
5 Court of Auditors — Special Report No 5/88 on management and control of public storage (OJ C 274, 24.10.1988).
6 Revīzijas palātas Īpašais ziņojums Nr. 2/99 par KLP ietekmi graudaugu sektorā (OV C 192, 8.7.1999.). 7 
6 Court of Auditors — Special Report No 2/99 on the effects of the CAP reform in the cereals sector (OJ C 192, 8.7.1999). 7
PĀRVALDĪBAS SISTĒMU PĀRSKATS 8. 
OVERVIEW OF THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 8.
Dalībvalstu maksājumu aģentūras atbild par intervences krājumu glabāšanas darbību pārvaldību7, proti, tās iepērk un realizē labību, slēdz līgumus par glabāšanas telpām, veic dažādas pārbaudes un vajadzīgo krājumu un grāmatvedības uzskaiti. 
The paying agencies of the Member States are responsible for the management of public storage operations7. This includes the purchase and disposal of the cereals, contracting of the storage facilities, carrying out various checks and maintaining the required physical and accounting records.
Maksājumu aģentūras ievada ziņas par krājumiem un finanšu datus Komisijas uzturētā elektroniskā datubāzē. 
The paying agencies input their physical and financial data into a Commission-maintained computer database.
Komisija šo informāciju izmanto, lai uzraudzītu stāvokli un aprēķinātu summas, kas dalībvalstīm ir jāsaņem vai jāmaksā. 
The Commission uses this information to monitor the situation and calculate the amounts due to or from Member States.
Intervences procedūra ļauj ražotājiem un starpniekiem pārdot labību par intervences cenu. 
Producers or intermediaries are given the opportunity to sell cereals to intervention at the intervention price.
Pirms maksājumu aģentūra labību pieņem, to sver un pārbauda, lai nodrošinātu, ka tā atbilst intervences obligātajiem nosa-cījumiem. 
Before acceptance by the paying agency, the cereals are weighed and analysed to ensure that their quality satisfies the minimum conditions for intervention.
Maksājumu aģentūras pielāgo intervences cenu, ņemot vērā zināmus kvalitātes rādītājus, piemēram, mitruma līmeni, piemaisījumus un specifisko svaru. 
The paying agencies adjust the intervention price to take account of certain quality characteristics, such as the moisture content, impurities and specific weight.