natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Препоръка 2: EuropeAid следва да приключи до края на x 2014 г. разработването на системата CRIS, за да се позволи лихвите по авансовото финансиране, които са в размер от 250 000 до 750 000 евро, да бъдат признавани за финансови приходи (Годишен доклад за 2013 г., точка 51, препоръка 2). 
Recommendation 2: EuropeAid should, by the end of x 2014, complete the development of the CRIS system to allow interest on pre-financing of between 250 000 and 750 000 euro to be recognised as financial revenue (2013 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 2).
Препоръка 4: EuropeAid следва да докладва в годишния x отчет за дейността относно напредъка при изпълнението на плана за действие за справяне със слабостите на системата си за контрол (Годишен доклад за 2013 г., точка 51, препоръка 4). 
Recommendation 4: EuropeAid should report in the x AAR on progress in the implementation of the action plan to address weaknesses in the control system (2013 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 4).
Препоръка 5: EuropeAid следва да посочи в своя x годишен отчет за дейността обхвата на проучването относно остатъчния процент грешки, както и определените долна и горна граница на грешките (Годишен доклад за 2013 г., точка 51, препоръка 5). 
Recommendation 5: EuropeAid should disclose in the x AAR the scope of the RER study and the estimated lower and upper error limits (2013 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 5).
Изцяло изпълнена В известна степен Не е изпълнена Не е приложимо Недостатъчни данни В голяма степен ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ 2 ПРОСЛЕДЯВАНЕ НА ИЗПЪЛНЕНИЕТО НА ПРЕДИШНИ ПРЕПОРЪКИ, СВЪРЗАНИ С ЕВРОПЕЙСКИТЕ ФОНДОВЕ ЗА РАЗВИТИЕ 
Fully implemented In most respects In some respects Not implemented Not applicable Insufficient evidence ANNEX 2 FOLLOW-UP OF PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
BG C 375/314 Официален вестник на Европейския съюз 13.10.2016 г. Година Препоръка на Сметната палата Анализ на Сметната палата на постигнатия напредък В процес на изпълнение Отговор на Комисията 2012 Препоръка 1: EuropeAid следва да преразгледа методологията си за процента остатъчни грешки (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 1). x Препоръка 2: EuropeAid следва да предостави точно описание в годишния си отчет за дейността на резултатите от проучванията на процента остатъчни грешки (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 2). x Препоръка 3: EuropeAid следва да осигури навременно изчистване на разходите (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 3). x Препоръка 4: EuropeAid следва да насърчава прилагането на механизми за по-добро управление на документацията от страна на партньорите по изпълнението и бенефициентите (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 4). x Препоръка 5: EuropeAid следва да предприеме ефективни мерки за подобряване на качеството на проверките на разходите, извършвани от външни одитори (вж. Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 5). x Препоръка 6: EuropeAid следва да осигури правилното прилагане на специфичните условия за извършване на плащания за бюджетна подкрепа (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 6). x Препоръка 7: EuropeAid следва да се увери, че нарежданията за събиране на вземания по отношение на лихвите по авансовото финансиране, надхвърлящи 750 000 евро, се изготвят ежегодно (Годишен доклад за 2012 г., точка 51, препоръка 7). x Изцяло изпълнена В известна степен Не е изпълнена Не е приложимо Недостатъчни данни В голяма степен 
EN C 375/314 Official Journal of the European Union 13.10.2016 Year Court recommendation Court's analysis of the progress made Being implemented Commission reply 2012 Recommendation 1: EuropeAid should review its RER methodology (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 1). x Recommendation 2: EuropeAid should provide an accurate description in the AAR of the results of RER studies (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 2). x Recommendation 3: EuropeAid should ensure the timely clearance of expenditure (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 3). x Recommendation 4: EuropeAid should promote better document management by implementing partners and beneficiaries (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 4). x Recommendation 5: EuropeAid should take effective measures in order to enhance the quality of expenditure verifications carried out by external auditors (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 5). x Recommendation 6: EuropeAid should ensure the correct application of specific conditions for budget support payments (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 6). x Recommendation 7: EuropeAid should make sure that recovery orders in respect of interest on pre-financing over 750000 euro are issued annually (2012 annual report, paragraph 51, recommendation 7). x Fully implemented In most respects In some respects Not implemented Not applicable Insufficient evidence
Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 357 Година 61 4 октомври 2018 г. Издание на български език Съдържание 2018/C 357/01 2018/C 357/02 Информация и известия IV Информация ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ Сметна палата Годишен доклад на Сметната палата относно изпълнението на бюджета за финансовата 2017 година, придруженототговоритенаинституциите ....................................... 
Official Journal of the European Union C 357 Volume 61 4 October 2018 English edition Contents 2018/C 357/01 2018/C 357/02 Information and Notices IV Notices NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES Court of Auditors Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year2017,togetherwiththeinstitutions’replies ...................................
1 Годишен доклад на Сметната палата относно дейностите, финансирани от Осмия, Деветия, Десетия и Единадесетия европейски фонд за развитие (ЕФР) за финансовата 2017 година, придружен от отговорите наКомисията .......................................................... 315 BG 
1 Annual report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2017, together with the Commission’sreplies .....................................................
©Европейски съюз, 2018 г. 
©European Union, 2018.
За всяко използване или възпроизвеждане на снимките или на другите материали, чиито авторски права не са притежание на Европейския съюз, трябва да бъде поискано разрешение пряко от притежателите на авторските права. 
For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the European Union copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders.
4.10.2018 г. Членовете на Сметната палата са: Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (председател), Henri GRETHEN, Ladislav BALKO, Lazaros S. LAZAROU, Pietro RUSSO, Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Илиана ИВАНОВА, George PUFAN, Neven MATES, Alex BRENNINKMEIJER, Danièle LAMARQUE, Nikolaos MILIONIS, Phil WYNN OWEN, Oskar HERICS, Bettina JAKOBSEN, Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, Samo JEREB, Jan GREGOR, Mihails KOZLOVS, Rimantas ŠADŽIUS, Leo BRINCAT, João FIGUEIREDO, Juhan PARTS, Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ, Eva LINDSTRÖM, Tony MURPHY, Hannu TAKKULA, Annemie TURTELBOOM. BG 
The Members of the Court of Auditors are: Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (President), Henri GRETHEN, Ladislav BALKO, Lazaros S. LAZAROU, Pietro RUSSO, Baudilio TOMÉ MUGURUZA, Iliana IVANOVA, George PUFAN, Neven MATES, Alex BRENNINKMEIJER, Danièle LAMARQUE, Nikolaos MILIONIS, Phil WYNN OWEN, Oskar HERICS, Bettina JAKOBSEN, Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, Samo JEREB, Jan GREGOR, Mihails KOZLOVS, Rimantas ŠADŽIUS, Leo BRINCAT, João FIGUEIREDO, Juhan PARTS, Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ, Eva LINDSTRÖM, Tony MURPHY, Hannu TAKKULA, Annemie TURTELBOOM.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/3 ANNUAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET (2018/C 357/01)
BG 4.10.2018 г. 1. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/7 GENERAL INTRODUCTION — 0.1.
3. 
0.3.
4. 
0.4.
6. 
0.6.
7. 
0.7.
5). 
On our website, we have published a glossary with definitions and explanations of most of these specific terms(5).
8. 
0.8.
Одитът на Сметната палата обхвана разходите, приети от Комисията през 2017 г. 4. BG 10. 
EN C 357/10 Official Journal of the European Union 4.10.2018 THE COURT'S STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE PROVIDED TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL — INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT Opinion I. We have audited: (a) the consolidated accounts of the European Union, which comprise the consolidated financial statements (1) and the budgetary implementation reports (2) for the financial year ended 31 December 2017, approved by the Commission on 27 June 2018, and (b) the legality and regularity of the transactions underlying those accounts, as required by Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
2017 г. 
In our opinion, the consolidated accounts of the European Union (EU) for the year ended 31 December 2017 present fairly, in all material respects, the EU’s financial position as at 31 December 2017, the results of its operations, its cash flows and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended, in accordance with the Financial Regulation and with accounting rules based on internationally accepted accounting standards for the public sector.
2017 г. 
In our opinion, except for the effects of the matter described in the ‘Basis for qualified opinion on the legality and regularity of payments underlying the accounts’ paragraph, the payments underlying the accounts for the year ended 31 December 2017 are legal and regular in all material respects.
Основание за изразяване на становище V. Сметната палата извърши своя одит в съответствие с международните одитни стандарти и етичните кодекси на Международната федерация на счетоводителите (IFAC) и международните стандарти на ИНТОСАЙ (МСВОИ). 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/11 Basis for opinion V. We conducted our audit in accordance with the IFAC International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and Codes of Ethics and the INTOSAI International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs).
Отговорностите на Сметната палата съгласно тези стандарти са описани подробно в раздела „Отговорности на одитора“ от доклада на ЕСП. 
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the ‘Auditor’s responsibilities’ section of our report.
Сметната палата е независима институция по смисъла на Етичния кодекс на професионалните счетоводители, публикуван от Съвета за международни етични стандарти на счетоводителите (СМЕСС), и е изпълнила другите си етични задължения в съответствие с тези изисквания и с Кодекса на СМЕСС. 
We are independent, in accordance with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities under those standards and requirements and the IESBA Code.
Основни одитни въпроси VII. 
Key audit matters VII.
Тези въпроси са разгледани общо в контекста на одита на финансовите отчети и при изготвянето на нашето становище относно отчетите, но не предоставяме отделно становище по тях. 
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, but we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
12. 27. 
(6) The guarantee was increased up to 26 billion euros in accordance with the amended EFSI Regulation of December 2017 (Regulation (EU) 2017/2396 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2017 amending Regulations (EU) No 1316/2013 and (EU) 2015/1017, OJ L 345, 27.12.2017, p.
IX. 
EN C 357/12 Official Journal of the European Union 4.10.2018 IX.
XI. 
We assessed the liability for pension and other employee benefits XI.
XII. 
XII.
XIV. 
XIV.
XV. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/13 We assessed the accrued charges presented in the accounts XV.
2016 г. 
At year-end 2017, the estimated value of incurred eligible expenses due to beneficiaries but not yet reported was 101 billion euros (year-end 2016: 102 billion euros).
XVII. 
XVII.
XVIII. 
We assessed the potential impact on the 2017 accounts of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union XVIII.
XIX. 
XIX.
XX. 
XX.
XXI. 
Other matters XXI.
В областта на разходите Сметната палата проверява операциите по извършване на плащания след като разходите са били извършени, вписани и приети. 
For expenditure, we examine payment transactions once expenditure has been incurred, recorded and accepted.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/15 XXIX.
XXI. 
XXXI.
Сметната палата описва тези въпроси в своя доклад, освен в случай че по силата на действащ закон или регламент се забранява публично оповестяване на въпроса, или когато в изключително редки случаи бъде взето решение, че даден въпрос не трябва да бъде упоменат в доклада на ЕСП, тъй като основателно може да се очаква неблагоприятните последствия от оповестяването на тази информация да бъдат повече от ползите за обществения интерес. 
We describe these matters in our report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure or, as happens extremely rarely, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh any public interest benefits.
12 юли 2018 г. Klaus-Heiner LEHNE Председател Европейска сметна палата 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi, 1615 Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG 
12 July 2018 Klaus-Heiner LEHNE President European Court of Auditors 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi, Luxembourg, LUXEMBOURG
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/17 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS EU spending is a significant tool for achieving policy objectives 1.4.
През 2017 г. 
In 2017, EU spending amounted to 137,4 billion euros(14), representing 2,0 % of EU Member States’ total general government spending and 0,9 % of EU gross national income (Box 1.1).
През 2017 г. 
In 2017, payments from the EU budget totalled 137,4 billion euros, comprising 29,7 billion euros as pre-financing and 107,7 billion euros as single, interim or final payments.
26. 
(16) Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
(18) Auditors are required to report on key audit matters as a result of the introduction of International Standard on Auditing 701 in 2015.
12. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/21 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 1.12.
13. 
1.13.
14. 
1.14.
2016 г. 
Our 2017 audit results confirm our findings from 2015 and 2016: namely, that the way expenditure is disbursed has an impact on the risk of error.
През 2017 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/25 Box 1.6 — 2017 entitlement-based payments are free from material error Source: ECA.
2016 г. 
We estimate the level of error for entitlement-based expenditure (excluding some rural development schemes) to be below our materiality threshold of 2 %, as it was in 2016.
2016 г. 
We estimate the level of error in this type of expenditure at 3,7 % (2016: 4,8 %), which significantly exceeds the materiality threshold of 2 % (Box 1.6).
21. 
1.21.
22. 
THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS We found a material level of error in spending on ‘Competitiveness’, ‘Cohesion’ and ‘Natural resources’ 1.22.
23. 
1.23.
25. 
‘Natural resources’ (chapter 7): as a whole, this area is materially affected by error.
26. 
‘Administration’ (chapter 10): this area is free from material error.
27. 
EN C 357/30 Official Journal of the European Union 4.10.2018 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Eligibility errors continue to contribute most to the estimated level of error for reimbursement-based expenditure 1.27. This year, we focused more closely on the types of error found in reimbursement-based spending as this is the area in which material error persists.
2016 г. 
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES Box 1.9 — Breakdown of the estimated level of error for reimbursement-based expenditure by type of error Source: ECA.
2016 г. 
Similarly to 2016, eligibility errors (i.e. ineligible costs in costs claims, non-respect of agri-environment-climate commitments (rural development) and ineligible projects/ activities or beneficiaries) contribute most to the 2017 estimated level of error.
2016 г. 
However, their impact increased significantly compared with 2016 (2017: 93 %; 2016: 73 %).
19. 
See also paragraph 7.19.
2016 г. 
(20) These figures were not published in box 1.6 of the 2016 annual report.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/31 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 1.29.
2016 г. 
In contrast to 2016, serious errors in public procurement contributed less than 1 % (2016: 18 %) to our estimated level of error.
31. 
1.31.
32. 
EN C 357/32 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 1.32.
33. 
1.33.
32. 
Box 1.10 shows how the amount at risk at payment ties in with these other indicators. of the European Union 4.10.2018 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 1.32.
2016 г. 
Box 1.10 — Relationship between the amount at risk at payment and the amount at risk at reporting/the overall amount at risk at closure Source: Commission — AMPR 2016, p.
34. 
1.34.
2016 г. 
The amount at risk at payment calculated by the Commission for 2017 and presented in the AMPR is at the lower end of our range at 1,7 % (compared to 2,1 %-2,6 % for 2016).
2016 г. 
Our estimated level of error is 2,4 % (2016: 3,1 %) in a range between 1,4 % and 3,4 %.
35. 
THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS The individual components of the Commission’s estimate are not always in line with our findings 1.35.
35. 
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 1.35.
36. 
EN C 357/34 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 1.36.
36. 
4.10.2018 (b) As regards MFF heading 1a ‘Competitiveness for growth and jobs’, the Commission considers that the information presented in the AARs in relation to regularity of underlying transactions has improved (see paragraphs 5.23-5.25).
39. 
See also Commission reply to paragraph 1.39.
39. 
EN C 357/36 Official Journal of the European Union 4.10.2018 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS The Commission’s estimate for corrections and recoveries is based on an adjusted historical average 1.39.
40. 
1.40.
39. 
THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 1.39.
2016 г. 
The 2017 AAR instructions, template and guidance have been clarified as a response to the ECA’s 2016 recommendations.
44. 
1.44.
45. 
1.45.
2016 г. 
In our annual reports for 2014, 2015 and 2016 we used data the Commission provided to us to differentiate between amounts resulting from preventive and corrective mechanisms.
46. 
1.46.
2016 г. 
Detailed information on financial corrections and recoveries is provided in the AMPR, like in 2016, and before that in the respective Commission Communications on the Protection of the EU Budget.
През 2017 г. 2016 г. 
In 2017: (a) we assessed the regularity of 703 transactions for our audit work on the annual report and produced 28 special reports; (b) we reported to OLAF 13 instances of suspected fraud found during our audits (11 in 2016), as well as 6 cases based on information provided by third parties (5 in 2016). 1.48.
През 2017 г. 
In 2017, the suspected fraud cases arising from our work which we transferred to OLAF most frequently concerned the artificial creation of the necessary conditions for EU financing, the declaration of costs not meeting the eligibility criteria and procurement irregularities.
2016 г. 
The Commission takes these decisions to clear expenditure incurred between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2016 which has been included in the certified financial accounts submitted by Member States by 15 February 2017.
40. 
(2) See ISSAI 4000, paragraph 40.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/41 (c) the changes in net assets for the year ended.
12. 
How we test transactions 12.
19. 
How we evaluate and present the results of transaction testing 19.
22. 
Estimated level of error 22.
26. 
How we arrive at our opinions in the statement of assurance 26.
27. BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/43 27.
30. 
Suspected fraud 30.
31. 
PART 4 — Link between the audit opinions on the reliability of accounts and on the regularity of transactions 31.
През 2017 г. 
BUDGETARY MANAGEMENT IN 2017 Compared to budget, commitments were high and payments remained low in the fourth year of the MFF 2.3.
2016 г. 
As in 2016, total payments in 2017 were much lower than anticipated.
2016 г. 
The 2017 ESI funds budgetary implementation for the 2014-2020 programming period improved compared to 2016.
2016 г. 
The payments made in 2017 were 1,5 times higher than the 2016 level.
През 2017 г. 
In 2017, after the reduction of payment appropriations by EUR 5,9 billion via amending budget 6/2017 full implementation of the voted budget was achieved.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/49 THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS Outstanding budgetary commitments exceeded last year’s record 2.6.
2016 г. 
The almost full use of the amount available for commitment and the low level of payments (see paragraphs 2.4– 2.5) increased outstanding budgetary commitments to a new record of 267,3 billion euros (2016: 238,8 billion euros).
2016 г. 
(6) See Commission reply to paragraph 2.14 of our 2016 annual report.
2016 г. 
We responded to this Commission communication by publishing our briefing paper ‘EU budget: time to reform?’ in November 2016.
2016 г. 
See also paragraphs 2.8-2.10 of our 2016 annual report.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
Secondly, it has been made possible, from 2017 onwards, to transfer to the Flexibility Instrument amounts lapsing from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and the European Union Solidarity Fund.
2016 г. 
The Commission refers to its reply under paragraph 2.14 of ECA's 2016 annual report.
През 2017 г. 
In 2017, the fourth year of the MFF, Member States absorbed an average of 16,4 % (2010: 22,1 %) of the amounts allocated to them.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/55 Box 2.5 — Absorption rates by Member State by the end of 2017 and by the end of 2010 Source: European Court of Auditors based on information from the Commission.
2016 г. 
(19) The Commission explained what it considers to be the reasons in various documents: its analysis of the budgetary implementation of the European Structural and Investment Funds in 2016; its mid-term review/revision of the 2014-2020 Multiannual Financial Framework and the accompanying staff working document COM(2016) 603 final and SWD(2016) 299 final; and its replies to the written questions to Commissioners Oettinger, Creţu and Thyssen on the 2016 discharge procedure.
2016 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal THE COURT’S OBSERVATIONS 2.17. In our 2016 annual report, we already pointed out that Member States may face challenges in identifying sufficient high-quality projects.
2016 г. 
(25) See paragraph 2.13 of our 2016 annual report.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/61 Box 2.9 — Key information on Trust Funds Note: Differences in the sum of pledges are due to rounding.
26. 
2.26.
2016 г. 
The Facility for Refugees in Turkey was established in January 2016 to help Turkey deal with the massive flow of refugees (see Box 2.10). of the European Union 4.10.2018 THE COMMISSION’S REPLIES 2.25.
2016 г. 
(28) See Recommendation 4 of Chapter 2 of our 2016 annual report.
BG 4.10.2018 г. 2016 г. 
EN 4.10.2018 Official Journal of the European Union C 357/63 Box 2.10 — Key information on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey Source: (a) Commission Decision of 24 November 2015 on the coordination of the actions of the Union and of the Member States through a coordination mechanism — the Refugee Facility for Turkey. (b) Commission Decision of 10 February 2016 on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey amending Commission Decision C(2015) 9500 of 24 November 2015. (c) Second Annual Report on the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (COM(2018) 91 final of 14.3.2018).