natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
По искане на докладчика или по предложение на Председателския съвет Парламентът може също да вземе решение въпрос, който не се нуждае от пълни разисквания, да бъде удовлетворен с кратко изложение в пленарна зала от страна на докладчика.
At the request of the rapporteur or on a proposal of the Conference of Presidents, Parliament may also decide that an item not needing a full debate be dealt with by means of a short presentation in plenary by the rapporteur.
В такъв случай Комисията има възможност за изказване и всеки член на ЕП има право на отговор, като внесе допълнително писмено изявление по реда на член 142, параграф 7.
In that event, the Commission shall have the opportunity to intervene and any Member shall have the right to react by handing in an additional written statement pursuant to Rule 142(7).
Член 142 – параграф 5
Rule 142 – paragraph 5
Комисията , Съветът и докладчикът могат да бъдат изслушани отново, в частност, за да отговорят на изказвания, направени от членове на ЕП.
The Commission , the Council and the rapporteur may be heard again, in particular to respond to the statements made by Members.
Член 151 – параграф 4
Rule 151 – paragraph 4
Политическа група или най-малко четиридесет членове на ЕП могат да внесат алтернативно предложение за резолюция, което да замени предложение за незаконодателна резолюция, съдържащо се в доклад на комисията.
A political group or at least forty members may table an alternative motion for a resolution to a non-legislative motion for a resolution contained in a committee report.
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ ІІа
ANNEX II a
- са от компетенцията и сферата на отговорност на съответната институция и са от общ интерес;
- fall within the competence and sphere of responsibility of the institution concerned and be of general interest;
- са кратки и съдържат разбираемо питане;
- be concise and contain an understandable interrogation;
- не съдържат обидни думи и изрази;
- not contain offensive language;
- не се отнасят до строго лични въпроси.
- not relate to strictly personal matters.
Ако въпрос не съответства на настоящите насоки, секретариатът предлага на вносителя формулировка, която би превърнала въпроса в допустим.
If a question does not comply with these guidelines, the Secretariat shall provide the author with advice on how the question may be drafted in order to be admissible.
Наново поставеният въпрос не се разглежда, освен ако вносителят се позове на нови съществени обстоятелства или цели получаване на допълнителна информация.
The renewed question shall not be forwarded unless the author invokes new significant developments or is seeking further information.
The internal reform agenda of the Parliament has acquired renewed importance as a result of the successful agreement on the Reform Treaty, which upgrades and enhances considerably the role of the European Parliament as a primary actor in the legislative process.
The internal reform agenda of the Parliament has acquired renewed importance as a result of the successful agreement on the Reform Treaty, which upgrades and enhances considerably the role of the European Parliament as a primary actor in the legislative process.
The key objective of the reform process which starts at present is to improve working procedures, to make them more transparent and to bring our institution closer to what citizens expect of a European Parliament today.
The key objective of the reform process which starts at present is to improve working procedures, to make them more transparent and to bring our institution closer to what citizens expect of a European Parliament today.
The proposed changes are the product of a deep reflection process, whose results have been concretised in subsequent steps.
The proposed changes are the product of a deep reflection process, whose results have been concretised in subsequent steps.
The Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament decided at its meeting of 15 February 2007 to establish a Working Party on Parliamentary Reform chaired by Ms Dagmar Roth-Behrendt.
The Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament decided at its meeting of 15 February 2007 to establish a Working Party on Parliamentary Reform chaired by Ms Dagmar Roth-Behrendt.
In line with the conferred mandate, Ms Roth-Behrendt submitted the First Interim Report, dealing with 'the Plenary and the Calendar of Activities', on 6 September 2007.
In line with the conferred mandate, Ms Roth-Behrendt submitted the First Interim Report, dealing with 'the Plenary and the Calendar of Activities', on 6 September 2007.
The Conference of Presidents, at its meeting on 25 October 2007, welcomed the report and adopted almost all of the proposals for reform contained in that document.
The Conference of Presidents, at its meeting on 25 October 2007, welcomed the report and adopted almost all of the proposals for reform contained in that document.
Many of these changes can take effect under the authority of the Conference itself, but a certain number of them require modifications in Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Many of these changes can take effect under the authority of the Conference itself, but a certain number of them require modifications in Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Therefore the Conference decided in that occasion to refer to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs the following items:
Therefore the Conference decided in that occasion to refer to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs the following items:
– The drawing up of guidelines for the procedure for written questions to the Commission and Council.
– The drawing up of guidelines for the procedure for written questions to the Commission and Council.
– The introduction of a procedure allowing reports qualifying for Rule 131(2) to benefit from the opportunity of a presentation in plenary by the rapporteur followed by a reaction by the Commission and from the faculty for other Members to table a written contribution.
– The introduction of a procedure allowing reports qualifying for Rule 131(2) to benefit from the opportunity of a presentation in plenary by the rapporteur followed by a reaction by the Commission and from the faculty for other Members to table a written contribution.
– The possibility for the introduction and the conclusion of debates in plenary on legislative texts by the rapporteur.
– The possibility for the introduction and the conclusion of debates in plenary on legislative texts by the rapporteur.
Taking into account the ulterior deliberations of the Working Party on parliamentary reform, the Conference of Presidents decided on 12 December 2007 the referral to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of additional items concerning the introduction of a simplified procedure for Non-legislative reports and the revision of the Rules of Procedure in order to facilitate the drafting of Legislative Initiative Reports.
Taking into account the ulterior deliberations of the Working Party on parliamentary reform, the Conference of Presidents decided on 12 December 2007 the referral to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs of additional items concerning the introduction of a simplified procedure for Non-legislative reports and the revision of the Rules of Procedure in order to facilitate the drafting of Legislative Initiative Reports.
In conformity to this decision and pursuant to Rule 202 of the Rules of Procedure the Committee on Constitutional Affairs has considered the suggested changes.
In conformity to this decision and pursuant to Rule 202 of the Rules of Procedure the Committee on Constitutional Affairs has considered the suggested changes.
Content and explanation of the reform measures adopted
Content and explanation of the reform measures adopted
The following paragraphs provide an explanation of the rationale behind the adoption of the reform measures proposed by the rapporteur.
The following paragraphs provide an explanation of the rationale behind the adoption of the reform measures proposed by the rapporteur.
Systematic references to the concrete suggestions formulated by the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform are also included in this statement.
Systematic references to the concrete suggestions formulated by the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform are also included in this statement.
The amendments to the Rules of Procedure contained in the decision of the Parliament are regrouped and illustrated in four sections referring to the different points raised by the Conference of Presidents.
The amendments to the Rules of Procedure contained in the decision of the Parliament are regrouped and illustrated in four sections referring to the different points raised by the Conference of Presidents.
The reform of the procedures concerning written questions to the Council or the Commission under Rule 110 (amendments 5, 6 and 11)
The reform of the procedures concerning written questions to the Council or the Commission under Rule 110 (amendments 5, 6 and 11)
The Working Party on Parliamentary Reform has observed in its conclusions that the current practice concerning written questions to the Council or the Commission under Rule 110 is clearly unsatisfactory.
The Working Party on Parliamentary Reform has observed in its conclusions that the current practice concerning written questions to the Council or the Commission under Rule 110 is clearly unsatisfactory.
The Commission has also strongly complained about the number of such questions and the administrative workload answering them imposes on its services.
The Commission has also strongly complained about the number of such questions and the administrative workload answering them imposes on its services.
In the framework of the efforts aimed at introducing a clearer structure and a new strategic programming for the part-sessions, the First Interim Report put forward the idea of formulating admissibility criteria and guidelines for these questions similar to the ones currently in place for oral questions under Rule 109.
In the framework of the efforts aimed at introducing a clearer structure and a new strategic programming for the part-sessions, the First Interim Report put forward the idea of formulating admissibility criteria and guidelines for these questions similar to the ones currently in place for oral questions under Rule 109.
As stated above the Conference of Presidents endorsed this suggestion.
As stated above the Conference of Presidents endorsed this suggestion.
Your rapporteur considered therefore the way how to implement this proposal and came to the conclusion that the appropriate solution would be to adopt a partial modification of Rule 110 in association with the insertion of a new Annex II a to the Rules of Procedure.
Your rapporteur considered therefore the way how to implement this proposal and came to the conclusion that the appropriate solution would be to adopt a partial modification of Rule 110 in association with the insertion of a new Annex II a to the Rules of Procedure.
Paragraph 1 of the rule is amended in order to make reference to the Annex, which is included in amendment 11 and contains the required guidelines for the admissibility of written questions.
Paragraph 1 of the rule is amended in order to make reference to the Annex, which is included in amendment 11 and contains the required guidelines for the admissibility of written questions.
The modification of Rule 110(2) establishes that the President will rule on the admissibility of written questions.
The modification of Rule 110(2) establishes that the President will rule on the admissibility of written questions.
However, in order to respond to fears that an excessive workload could be a hindrance to her/his activity, it has to be observed that pursuant to Rule 20(3) the President will always benefit from the possibility of delegating the exercise of the powers under Rule 110(2) to a Vice-president.
However, in order to respond to fears that an excessive workload could be a hindrance to her/his activity, it has to be observed that pursuant to Rule 20(3) the President will always benefit from the possibility of delegating the exercise of the powers under Rule 110(2) to a Vice-president.
The criteria are formulated in a form, which fully respects the right of Members to address written questions to the Commission and to expect an answer in due time.
The criteria are formulated in a form, which fully respects the right of Members to address written questions to the Commission and to expect an answer in due time.
On the other hand clear provisions are introduced to avert any abuses of this right, the requirement to set aside identical or similar questions (point 3 of the new Annex), as well as the non admissibility of questions making use of offensive language (point 1 of the new Annex).
On the other hand clear provisions are introduced to avert any abuses of this right, the requirement to set aside identical or similar questions (point 3 of the new Annex), as well as the non admissibility of questions making use of offensive language (point 1 of the new Annex).
This point in particular should prevent any possible outrages to the fundamental values of the European Union.
This point in particular should prevent any possible outrages to the fundamental values of the European Union.
The Secretariat of the Presidency will be in charge of submitting appropriate suggestions to those Members, whose questions do not meet the guidelines contained in Annex IIa.
The Secretariat of the Presidency will be in charge of submitting appropriate suggestions to those Members, whose questions do not meet the guidelines contained in Annex IIa.
In order to provide the Secretariat with some time to adapt its internal structure to cope with these tasks points 2 and 3 of Annex IIa will enter into force at a later stage.
In order to provide the Secretariat with some time to adapt its internal structure to cope with these tasks points 2 and 3 of Annex IIa will enter into force at a later stage.
The introduction of a new Rule 131a concerning the short presentation of a report not needing a full debate (amendment 8)
The introduction of a new Rule 131a concerning the short presentation of a report not needing a full debate (amendment 8)
The Working Party on Parliamentary Reform observed that, in order to improve the quality of agenda setting for the part-sessions, rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs should be given more incentives for a better application of Rule 131 regarding the procedure in plenary without amendment and debate.
The Working Party on Parliamentary Reform observed that, in order to improve the quality of agenda setting for the part-sessions, rapporteurs and shadow rapporteurs should be given more incentives for a better application of Rule 131 regarding the procedure in plenary without amendment and debate.
The First Interim Report on "the Plenary and the Calendar of Activities" proposed the introduction of an incentive for rapporteurs to renounce having a fully-fledged debate by setting aside time slots where rapporteurs could present their reports in plenary without subsequent discussion.
The First Interim Report on "the Plenary and the Calendar of Activities" proposed the introduction of an incentive for rapporteurs to renounce having a fully-fledged debate by setting aside time slots where rapporteurs could present their reports in plenary without subsequent discussion.
Taking into account this suggestion, your rapporteur opted for the introduction of a new Rule 131a.
Taking into account this suggestion, your rapporteur opted for the introduction of a new Rule 131a.
This amendment will improve the current practice.
This amendment will improve the current practice.
The Parliament could decide in the future, at the request of the rapporteur and on a proposal of the Conference of Presidents that a report not needing a full debate is presented to the plenary by the rapporteur during a specific time slot.
The Parliament could decide in the future, at the request of the rapporteur and on a proposal of the Conference of Presidents that a report not needing a full debate is presented to the plenary by the rapporteur during a specific time slot.
The presentation by the rapporteur would only be followed by a reaction by the Commission, and no other interventions by Members would be possible.
The presentation by the rapporteur would only be followed by a reaction by the Commission, and no other interventions by Members would be possible.
Members will, however, have the opportunity to hand in written interventions according to the provisions of Rule 142(7).
Members will, however, have the opportunity to hand in written interventions according to the provisions of Rule 142(7).
Furthermore, in accordance with the recommendations contained in Chapter 4 of the First Interim Report on parliamentary reform and to the decisions taken by the Conference of Presidents on 12 December 2007, this new rule will provide the general procedure for the examination in plenary of Own-initiative reports with some exceptions (see section 4 below).
Furthermore, in accordance with the recommendations contained in Chapter 4 of the First Interim Report on parliamentary reform and to the decisions taken by the Conference of Presidents on 12 December 2007, this new rule will provide the general procedure for the examination in plenary of Own-initiative reports with some exceptions (see section 4 below).
The increase of Parliament's visibility in the debates by modifying Rule 142 on the allocation of speaking time (amendment 9)
The increase of Parliament's visibility in the debates by modifying Rule 142 on the allocation of speaking time (amendment 9)
Concerning Parliament's priorities for the organisation of annual debates, the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform noticed the necessity to increase Parliament's visibility and to enhance the liveliness of discussions.
Concerning Parliament's priorities for the organisation of annual debates, the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform noticed the necessity to increase Parliament's visibility and to enhance the liveliness of discussions.
In order to achieve this goal, the First Interim Report produced by that Working Party recommended the intervention on the organisation of debates by implementing several measures.
In order to achieve this goal, the First Interim Report produced by that Working Party recommended the intervention on the organisation of debates by implementing several measures.
Among them figured notably the provision as a general rule that discussions on legislative texts should be introduced and concluded by the rapporteur.
Among them figured notably the provision as a general rule that discussions on legislative texts should be introduced and concluded by the rapporteur.
The simple modification of paragraph 5 of Rule 142 contained in this decision serves the purpose of that recommendation.
The simple modification of paragraph 5 of Rule 142 contained in this decision serves the purpose of that recommendation.
The presentation of the parliamentary report by the rapporteur in the first place will greatly contribute to give central stage to the position of the European Parliament on the relevant item discussed in the framework of the legislative process.
The presentation of the parliamentary report by the rapporteur in the first place will greatly contribute to give central stage to the position of the European Parliament on the relevant item discussed in the framework of the legislative process.
On the other hand, if this arrangement constitutes a general rule for the normal conduct of the debate, the provision in itself does not prevent the President of the Parliament to decide in specific circumstances that for particular reasons the representative of the Commission or the representative of the Council should be allowed to speak first.
On the other hand, if this arrangement constitutes a general rule for the normal conduct of the debate, the provision in itself does not prevent the President of the Parliament to decide in specific circumstances that for particular reasons the representative of the Commission or the representative of the Council should be allowed to speak first.
The formulation proposed by your rapporteur ensures finally also that, after the statement given by the Council and/or Commission and by the Speakers who are officially designated by their Political Groups, the second part of the debate could be reserved for interventions and questions by those Members who have been attending and participating to the assembly.
The formulation proposed by your rapporteur ensures finally also that, after the statement given by the Council and/or Commission and by the Speakers who are officially designated by their Political Groups, the second part of the debate could be reserved for interventions and questions by those Members who have been attending and participating to the assembly.
The procedure is hence conceived in a way, which grants the possibility of having a comprehensive discussion on Commission proposals as well as on texts originating form the Council.
The procedure is hence conceived in a way, which grants the possibility of having a comprehensive discussion on Commission proposals as well as on texts originating form the Council.
The modification of the Rules concerning Own-initiative reports (amendments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10)
The modification of the Rules concerning Own-initiative reports (amendments 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10)
On 12 December 2007 the Conference of Presidents approved further reform measures aiming at differentiating between the various types of own-initiative report and based on the propositions of the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform.
On 12 December 2007 the Conference of Presidents approved further reform measures aiming at differentiating between the various types of own-initiative report and based on the propositions of the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform.
There will be five categories of initiative reports, each with a distinct procedure for authorisation and treatment in plenary: Legislative Initiative Reports; Strategic Reports (reacting to strategic and priority initiatives included in the Commission's annual Legislative and Work Programme); Non-Legislative Initiative Reports; Annual Activity and Monitoring Reports; Implementation Reports;
There will be five categories of initiative reports, each with a distinct procedure for authorisation and treatment in plenary: Legislative Initiative Reports; Strategic Reports (reacting to strategic and priority initiatives included in the Commission's annual Legislative and Work Programme); Non-Legislative Initiative Reports; Annual Activity and Monitoring Reports; Implementation Reports;
Pursuant to this differentiation the Conference of Presidents also decided to refer to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs new items requiring changes to Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
Pursuant to this differentiation the Conference of Presidents also decided to refer to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs new items requiring changes to Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
The Committee was also requested to proceed to the coherent technical consolidation of the Rules with regard to non-legislative reports in general and initiatives reports in particular.
The Committee was also requested to proceed to the coherent technical consolidation of the Rules with regard to non-legislative reports in general and initiatives reports in particular.
In accordance with this request your rapporteur is proposing a coherent set of amendments.
In accordance with this request your rapporteur is proposing a coherent set of amendments.
In order to clarify and consolidate the Rules with regard to reports dealing with rights of initiative conferred to Parliament by the Treaties, it seemed appropriate to introduce a new Rule 38a (amendment 1).
In order to clarify and consolidate the Rules with regard to reports dealing with rights of initiative conferred to Parliament by the Treaties, it seemed appropriate to introduce a new Rule 38a (amendment 1).