natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· de limiter le recours à la procédure de comitologie pour revenir à une répartition normale de son champ d'application, excluant les articles mais permettant d'adapter les annexes en fonction de l'évolution des pratiques et du droit maritime communautaire et international.
· limit the use of the comitology procedure to the area to which it is normally confined, by excluding articles from its scope but providing for it to be used to update annexes in the light of changes in practice and Community and international maritime law;
· de préciser la future base de données des inspections, un élément central à la réussite du nouveau régime d'inspection.
· describe more precisely the future inspection database, which is crucial for the success of the future inspection regime;
· de renforcer et clarifier le lien entre le régime communautaire d'inspection et le régime d'inspection du Mémorandum de Paris.
· strengthen and clarify the link between the Community inspection regime and the Paris Memorandum inspection regime.
Votre Rapporteur estime que ce texte représente une bien meilleure base de travail en vue de la première lecture.
Your rapporteur considers that this text provides a much better basis for the first reading.
Toutefois, d'autres amendements ultérieurs pourraient s'avérer nécessaires pour tenir compte des évolutions des discussions avec la Commission européenne et le Conseil, mais aussi au niveau du Mémorandum de Paris.
However, further amendments might prove necessary to take account of developments in the discussions with the Commission and the Council, and also in the context of the Paris Memorandum.
Votre rapporteur estime toutefois, quelle que soit l'issue des travaux du Mémorandum de Paris, qu'il est indispensable que cette refonte de directive soit acceptée et adoptée par les États membres.
Your rapporteur considers, however, that regardless of the outcome of the Paris Memorandum proceedings, it is essential for this recast directive to be accepted and adopted by the Member States.
Les nombreuses modifications apportées au texte clarifient le lien avec le Mémorandum de Paris et rendent possibles une large convergence avec ce dernier.
The many changes made to the text clarify the link with the Paris Memorandum and make it possible to ensure a greater degree of convergence with the latter.
Il est ainsi indispensable que le Conseil fasse de l'adoption de cette refonte de directive une priorité.
It is essential, therefore, that the Council make the adoption of this recast directive a priority.
Avec un texte clair et fort comme celui qui est présenté, il n'existe plus de raisons solides d'attendre la conclusion définitive des travaux au sein du Mémorandum de Paris pour adopter cette directive.
With a clear and strong text such as the one proposed by your rapporteur, there are no longer any valid reasons for waiting for the definitive conclusion of the Paris Memorandum proceedings before adopting this directive.
Un certain nombre de points techniques comme ceux liés à l'application du régime d'inspection dans les mouillages, à l'encadrement du dépôt des plaintes et à leur traitement, à la mise en place de la liste noire des compagnies maritimes sous‑performantes ou aux procédures d'inspection pourrait encore devoir être précisé.
It is possible that a certain number of technical points - relating to such matters as the application of the inspection regime at anchorages, rules on lodging and dealing with complaints, the drawing up of a blacklist of under-performing shipping companies and inspection procedures - will need to be clarified further.
Votre Rapporteur va donc poursuivre ses consultations et n'exclut pas la possibilité de présenter d'autres amendements plus tard, afin que cette refonte permette de poser les bases solides et claires d'un régime communautaire de contrôle par l'État du port.
Your rapporteur will continue her consultations, therefore, and does not rule out the possibility of submitting additional amendments at a later date, to ensure that the recast directive provides a solid and clear basis for a Community port State control regime.
Контрол от пристанищната държава (преработка)
Port State control (recast version)
Разглеждане в комисия
Discussed in
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
по предложението за решение на Съвета за приспособяване на разпоредбите относно Съда на Европейските общности в областите, включени в дял IV на част трета от Договора за създаване на Европейската общност
on the draft Council decision adapting the provisions concerning the Court of Justice in fields covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community
PE 382.638v03-00
PE 382.638v03-00
относно предложението за решение на Съвета за приспособяване на разпоредбите относно Съда на Европейските общности в областите, включени в дял IV на част трета от Договора за създаване на Европейската общност
on the draft Council decision adapting the provisions concerning the Court of Justice in fields covered by Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета, приложено към съобщението на Комисията ( COM(2006)0346 - C6‑0304/2006 ),
– having regard to the draft Council decision, annexed to the Commission communication ( COM(2006)0346 - C6‑0304/2006 ),
– като взе предвид член 67, параграф 2, второ тире от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него,
– having regard to Article 67(2), second indent, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси ( A6‑0082/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs( A6‑0082/2007 ),
5. призовава Съвета да ускори задействането на клаузата за преход с цел премахване на ограниченията на правомощията на Съда на Европейските общности във връзка с дял IV на Договора, като отбелязва, че той вече е призовал Съвета да премахне тези ограничения на правомощията на Съда;
Calls on the Council to speed up the activation of the "passerelle" clauses in order to remove the restrictions of the powers of the Court of Justice in connection with Title IV of the Treaty, while pointing out that it has already called on the Council to remove those restrictions on the powers of the Court;
According to the Court of Justice, the preliminary ruling procedure is "essential for the preservation of the Community character of the law established by the Treaty and has the object of ensuring that in all circumstances this law is the same in all States of the Community"
According to the Court of Justice, the preliminary ruling procedure is "essential for the preservation of the Community character of the law established by the Treaty and has the object of ensuring that in all circumstances this law is the same in all States of the Community"
From the point of view of the Legal Affairs Committee's competence for judicial cooperation in civil matters, and particularly private international law, it is noteworthy that the "communitarisation" of the conventions on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and in matrimonial matters by Regulations Nos 44/2001 and 1347/2000 constituted a step backwards as compared with the former protocols to those conventions, which conferred jurisdiction to seek preliminary rulings also on appellate courts and not merely on courts of last instance
From the point of view of the Legal Affairs Committee's competence for judicial cooperation in civil matters, and particularly private international law, it is noteworthy that the "communitarisation" of the conventions on jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and in matrimonial matters by Regulations Nos 44/2001 and 1347/2000 constituted a step backwards as compared with the former protocols to those conventions, which conferred jurisdiction to seek preliminary rulings also on appellate courts and not merely on courts of last instance
See Lenaerts, Arts, Maselis, Bray (ed.), Procedural Law of the European Union , Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2006, at 22-001. .
See Lenaerts, Arts, Maselis, Bray (ed.), Procedural Law of the European Union , Sweet & Maxwell, London, 2006, at 22-001. .
During a transitional period of five years following the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the Council shall act unanimously on a proposal from the Commission or on the initiative of a Member State and after consulting the European Parliament.
During a transitional period of five years following the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the Council shall act unanimously on a proposal from the Commission or on the initiative of a Member State and after consulting the European Parliament.
After this period of five years:
After this period of five years:
- the Council shall act on proposals from the Commission; the Commission shall examine any request made by a Member State that it submit a proposal to the Council,
- the Council shall act on proposals from the Commission; the Commission shall examine any request made by a Member State that it submit a proposal to the Council,
This proposal would:
This proposal would:
· ensure the uniform application and interpretation of Community law also in this area;
· ensure the uniform application and interpretation of Community law also in this area;
· make it possible to strengthen judicial protection in fields that are particularly sensitive in terms of fundamental rights;
· make it possible to strengthen judicial protection in fields that are particularly sensitive in terms of fundamental rights;
· enable the Community judicial system to perform normally in this area.
· enable the Community judicial system to perform normally in this area.
More specifically, the proposal would be conducive to the uniform interpretation and application of the EC law - and hence to a uniform system of judicial protection - in the area covered by Title IV.
More specifically, the proposal would be conducive to the uniform interpretation and application of the EC law - and hence to a uniform system of judicial protection - in the area covered by Title IV.
Again, the full application of the preliminary ruling procedure to Title IV would reinforce the judicial protection of people concerned.
Again, the full application of the preliminary ruling procedure to Title IV would reinforce the judicial protection of people concerned.
At present, persons who consider that their fundamental rights have been violated by a Community act adopted under that Title can refer a question for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice only if they have exhausted all national remedies in the sense that they have to take their case to the court of final appeal.
At present, persons who consider that their fundamental rights have been violated by a Community act adopted under that Title can refer a question for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice only if they have exhausted all national remedies in the sense that they have to take their case to the court of final appeal.
The expense of doing so may deter litigants and justice may suffer.
The expense of doing so may deter litigants and justice may suffer.
It is questionable whether the present position is compatible with the Union's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.
It is questionable whether the present position is compatible with the Union's obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.
If the proposal is accepted, even national courts of first instance will be able to refer a question for a preliminary ruling.
If the proposal is accepted, even national courts of first instance will be able to refer a question for a preliminary ruling.
It should be noted that the Commission has stressed that the resulting additional references for preliminary ruling in this area will not increase the Court's workload unreasonably if reliance is placed on the efficiency of the means of internal organisation which have been adopted and the new possibilities created by the Nice Treaty, such as the accelerated procedure.
It should be noted that the Commission has stressed that the resulting additional references for preliminary ruling in this area will not increase the Court's workload unreasonably if reliance is placed on the efficiency of the means of internal organisation which have been adopted and the new possibilities created by the Nice Treaty, such as the accelerated procedure.
Under to the accelerated procedure for preliminary references, the President of the ECJ may exceptionally decide at the request of the national court, on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, to apply an accelerated procedure where the circumstances referred to establish that a ruling on the question put to the Court is a matter of exceptional urgency.
Under to the accelerated procedure for preliminary references, the President of the ECJ may exceptionally decide at the request of the national court, on a proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, to apply an accelerated procedure where the circumstances referred to establish that a ruling on the question put to the Court is a matter of exceptional urgency.
The President immediately fixes the date for the hearing, which is notified to any possible participants, who may lodge statements of case or written observations within no less than 15 days.
The President immediately fixes the date for the hearing, which is notified to any possible participants, who may lodge statements of case or written observations within no less than 15 days.
What is more, the Court of Justice proposes creating a new type of procedure - the emergency preliminary ruling procedure - which would enable a case to be dealt with in an even shorter time than that allowed by the accelerated procedure.
What is more, the Court of Justice proposes creating a new type of procedure - the emergency preliminary ruling procedure - which would enable a case to be dealt with in an even shorter time than that allowed by the accelerated procedure.
Under that procedure, cases requiring to be dealt with particularly expeditiously could be entrusted to a special Chamber that would follow a streamlined procedure, possibly counterbalanced by the opportunity for re-examination.
Under that procedure, cases requiring to be dealt with particularly expeditiously could be entrusted to a special Chamber that would follow a streamlined procedure, possibly counterbalanced by the opportunity for re-examination.
In view of the above considerations, the Commission's proposal should be commended and Parliament's request to the Council to remove the restrictions on the powers of the Court of Justice in the context of Title IV of the TEC restated.
In view of the above considerations, the Commission's proposal should be commended and Parliament's request to the Council to remove the restrictions on the powers of the Court of Justice in the context of Title IV of the TEC restated.
See P6_TA-PROV(2006)0525 , author Cavada .
See P6_TA-PROV(2006)0525 , author Cavada .
Приспособяване на разпоредбите на дял IV от Договора за създаване на Европейската общност относно правомощията на Съда на Европейските общности
Adaptation of the provisions of Title IV of the EC Treaty relating to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Mogens N.J. Camre, Nicole Fontaine, Janelly Fourtou, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Eva Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon
Mogens N.J. Camre, Nicole Fontaine, Janelly Fourtou, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Eva Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon
по предложението за регламент на Съвета за установяване на режим за компенсиране на допълнителните разходи във връзка с търговската реализация на някои рибни продукти от Азорските острови, Мадейра, Канарските острови и френските департаменти Гвиана и Реюнион, за периода 2007 - 2013 г.
on the proposal for a Council regulation introducing a scheme to compensate for the additional costs incurred in the marketing of certain fishery products from the Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and the French departments of Guiana and Réunion from 2007 to 2013
PE 384.481v02-00
PE 384.481v02-00
EXPOSÉ DES MOTIFS............................................................................................................20
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................18
AVIS de la commission des budgets ........................................................................26
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................23
AVIS de la commission du dÉveloppement rÉgional .....................................31
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................28
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0740 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0740 )
– като взе предвид членове37 и 299, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0505/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 37 and 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0505/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по рибно стопанство и становищата на комисията по бюджети и на комисията по регионално развитие ( A6‑0083/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0083/2007 ),
Proposition de règlement du Conseil instaurant un régime de compensation des surcoûts qui grèvent l 'écoulement de certains produits de la pêche des Açores, de Madère, des îles Canaries et des départements français de la Guyane et de la Réunion , pour la période de 2007 à 2013
Proposal for a Council regulation introducing a scheme to compensate for the additional costs incurred in the marketing of certain fishery products from the Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and the French departments of Guiana and Réunion from 2007 to 2013
Предложение за регламент на Съвета за установяване на режим за компенсиране на допълнителните разходи, които произтичат от крайната отдалеченост, при търговската реализация на някои рибни продукти от Азорските острови, Мадейра, Канарските острови и френските департаменти Гвиана и Реюнион
Proposal for a Council regulation introducing a scheme to compensate for the additional costs incurred in the marketing of certain fishery products from the Azores, Madeira, the Canary Islands, and the French departments of Guiana and Réunion , as a result of those regions' remoteness
(Тази промяна е приложима за целия законодателен текст.
(This amendment applies throughout the text.)
(–1) Крайно отдалечените райони са икономически слаби, белязани от постоянни структурни фактори, които обуславят тяхното развитие, и от ограничени възможности за икономическа диверсификация, в които секторът на риболова и традиционните риболовни общности имат важна роля за поддържане на възходяща и низходяща икономическа активност и заетост, както и за насърчаване на икономическото и социално сближаване .
(-1a) The outermost regions have fragile economies, with permanent structural constraints on their development and few possibilities for diversification, in which the fisheries sector and ancient fishing communities play an important role in maintaining economic activity and employment, upstream and downstream, and in promoting economic and social cohesion.
Il convient de tenir compte des facteurs structurels permanents qui conditionnent le développement des régions ultrapériphériques, ainsi que de l'importance socioéconomique du secteur de la pêche dans ce contexte qui, à maints égards, a représenté l'une des rares alternatives économiques pour ces régions, contribuant à la cohésion économique et sociale.
The permanent structural constraints on the development of the outermost regions have to be taken into account, as does the socio-economic importance of the fisheries sector, which more often than not is one of the few economic alternatives available to these regions, and one that helps to foster economic and social cohesion.
(-1а) Следва да се отчитат спецификите и секторните различия, съществуващи между крайно отдалечените райони, доколкото последните имат различни нужди.
(-1b) The specific features of the outermost regions and the differences in terms of their respective sectors of activity should be taken into account, given that these regions each have their own particular needs.
Il est nécessaire de tenir compte du fait que les régions ultrapériphériques, bien qu'ayant en commun un certain nombre de difficultés, présentent cependant des différences considérables qui doivent être prises en ligne de compte par le présent règlement, ainsi que lors de son application.
It has to be borne in mind that, for all the difficulties which the outermost regions have in common, there are also considerable differences from one region to the next, and the necessary allowance must accordingly be made in the regulation as such and in its implementation.
(-1б) Следва да се отчита повишаването на цените за транспорт и свързаните с тях разходи, регистрирано през 2003 г. и държащо се на голямото повишение на цените на петрола, които увеличават допълнителната себестойност, свързана с крайната отдалеченост.
(-1c) The increase which the marked rise in oil prices has brought about, especially since 2003, in transport and other related costs should be taken into account, since its end effect is to add still further to the additional costs arising from remoteness.
Il est nécessaire de mettre l'accent sur la hausse des coûts du transport due à la forte augmentation du prix du pétrole, qui a accentué les surcoûts liés à l'ultrapériphéricité.
Attention should be drawn to the increased transport costs resulting from higher oil prices, which have added to the additional costs arising from remoteness.