natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Но ако поради сезонни причини по време на проверка на място контролиращият орган не успее да осъществи контрол относно спазването на определени законоустановени изисквания за управление и добро селскостопанско и екологично състояние, или на части от тях, тези изисквания и условия се считат за спазени.
However, if the controlling agency could not control a particular statutory management requirement, or a part thereof, or good agricultural and environmental conditions during an on-the-spot check, due to seasonal reasons, those requirements and conditions shall be deemed to be met."
Point 3 is added to the rapporteur's initial proposal.
Point 3 is added to the rapporteur's initial proposal.
If Member States were obliged to carry out repetitive controls, in case certain requirements or conditions could not be checked due to seasonal reasons, this would lead to an unacceptable increase in the costs of control of the Member States.
If Member States were obliged to carry out repetitive controls, in case certain requirements or conditions could not be checked due to seasonal reasons, this would lead to an unacceptable increase in the costs of control of the Member States.
Член 44, параграф 3 (Регламент (EО) № 1782/2003)
Article 44, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
„Освен в случай на непреодолима сила или извънредни обстоятелства тези парцели трябва да са на разположение на земеделския производител на 15 юни в годината на подаване на молбата за помощ.“
Except in case of force majeure or exceptional circumstances, these parcels shall be at the farmer's disposal on the 15 June of the year of submission of the aid application.
„Освен в случай на непреодолима сила или извънредни обстоятелства тези парцели трябва да са на разположение на земеделския производител на последния ден от срока за подаване, валиден в съответната държава-членка, в годината на подаване на молбата за помощ.“
Except in case of force majeure or exceptional circumstances, these parcels shall be at the farmer's disposal on the latest date for submission applicable in the Member State concerned of the year of submission of the aid application.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 5, БУКВА A
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5, POINT (A)
Член 143 б, параграф 5, алинея 1, ново изречение (Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003)
Article 143 b, paragraph 5, subparagraph 1, new sentence (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 5, БУКВА Б
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5, POINT (B)
Член 143 б, параграф 6, алинея 3 (Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003)
Article 143 b, paragraph 6, subparagraph 3 (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
Считано от 1 януари 2005 г. до 31 декември 2008 г. молбите съгласно членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 са незадължителни за новите държави-членки, доколкото тези норми се отнасят до законоустановените изисквания към управлението .
As from 1 January 2005 and until 31 December 2008 the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 shall be optional for the new Member States insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
От 1 януари 2009 г. земеделският производител, който получава плащания по схемата за единно плащане на площ, трябва да спазва законоустановените изисквания към управлението , посочени в приложение III, в съответствие със следния график:
As from 1 January 2009 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III according to the following timetable:
Считано от 1 януари 2005 г. до 31 декември 2008 г. прилагането на членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 е незадължително за новите държави-членки, доколкото тези разпоредби се отнасят до законоустановените изисквания за управление .
As from 1 January 2005 and until 31 December 2008 the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 shall be optional for the new Member States insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
От 1 януари 2009 г. земеделският производител, който получава плащания по схемата за единно плащане на площ, трябва да спазва законоустановените изисквания за управление , посочени в приложение III, в съответствие със следния график:
As from 1 January 2009 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III according to the following timetable:
а) посочените в точка А изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2009 г.;
(a) requirements referred to in point A shall apply from 1 January 2009;
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2010 г .;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2010 ;
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2011 г .;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2011 ;
в) посочените в точка В изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2011 г .
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2011 .
в) посочените в точка В изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2013 г.
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2013 .
За България и Румъния обаче, молбите съгласно членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 са незадължителни до 31 декември 2011 г., доколкото тези норми се отнасят до законоустановените изисквания към управлението .
However, for Bulgaria and Romania, the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 shall be optional until 31 December 2011 insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
От 1 януари 2012 г. земеделският производител, който получава плащания по схемата за единно плащане на площ, трябва да спазва законоустановените изисквания за управление, посочени в приложение III, в съответствие със следния график:
As from 1 January 2012 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III according to the following timetable:
За България и Румъния обаче, прилагането на членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 е незадължително до 31 декември 2011 г., доколкото тези разпоредби се отнасят до законоустановените изисквания за управление .
However, for Bulgaria and Romania, the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 shall be optional until 31 December 2011 insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
а) посочените в точка А изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2012 г.;
(a) requirements referred to in point A shall apply from 1 January 2012;
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2013 г .;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2013 ;
посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2014 г.;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2014 ;
в) посочените в точка В изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2014 г .
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2014 .
в) посочените в точка В изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2016 г.
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2016 .
Новите държави-членки могат да приложат тази опция също в случая, когато вземат решение за преустановяване прилагането на схемата за единно плащане на площ преди края на предвидения в параграф 9 период за прилагане.“
New Member States may apply this option also in the case where they decide to terminate the application of the single area payment scheme before the end of the period of application provided for in paragraph 9.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 5, БУКВА В
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5, POINT (C)
Член 143 б, параграф 9, първо изречение (Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003)
Article 143 b, paragraph 9, first sentence (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
„За новите държави-членки схемата за единно плащане на площ е достъпна за заявен период до края на 2010. “
For any new Member States the single area payment scheme shall be available for a period of application until the end of 2010 .
„За новите държави-членки схемата за единно плащане на площ е достъпна за заявен период до края на 2013 г. “
For any new Member States the single area payment scheme shall be available for a period of application until the end of 2013 .
It is economically hardly possible to justify for the majority of NMS to change the present direct payment system of SAPS to SPS model starting from year 2010 instead of 2013.
It is economically hardly possible to justify for the majority of NMS to change the present direct payment system of SAPS to SPS model starting from year 2010 instead of 2013.
In order to start the SPS system in 2010 the NMS should already begin their preparatory work spending huge amount of money for the system that might function only for 2-3 years.
In order to start the SPS system in 2010 the NMS should already begin their preparatory work spending huge amount of money for the system that might function only for 2-3 years.
This will cause additional and unnecessary financial burden for Member States that will obtain their 100% direct payments no sooner than in year 2013.
This will cause additional and unnecessary financial burden for Member States that will obtain their 100% direct payments no sooner than in year 2013.
Член 145, буква м) (Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003)
Article 145, point (m) (Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003)
5а) В член 145, буква м) се заменя със следния текст:
(5a) In Article 145, point (m) is replaced by the following:
„м) правила относно административните проверки, проверките на място и дистанционните проверки.
"(m) rules on the administrative and on-the-spot checks and the checks by remote sensing.
В случая с контрола съгласно дял ІІ, глава І установените правила предвиждат редовно и достатъчно предварително известие за проверките на място, когато това не застрашава самата цел на контрола.
In the case of controls pursuant to Title II Chapter 1 the rules laid down shall provide for regular and sufficient advance notice of on-the-spot checks where this does not jeopardise the actual goal of the controls.
Правилата предвиждат също така стимули за държавите-членки за въвеждане на система за функциониращ и съгласуван контрол.“
The rules shall also provide for incentives for Member States to put in place a system of well-functioning and coherent controls."
There is consensus that, where possible, on-the-spot-controls are necessary, as it is not just and reasonable to expect a modern farmer to have the time available for extensive and time-consuming controls without advance notice.
There is consensus that, where possible, on-the-spot-controls are necessary, as it is not just and reasonable to expect a modern farmer to have the time available for extensive and time-consuming controls without advance notice.
Announced controls shall be limited to aspects where advance notice will allow farmers to manipulate the result.
Announced controls shall be limited to aspects where advance notice will allow farmers to manipulate the result.
Член 51, параграф 3, алинея 2 (Регламент (ЕО) № 1698/2005)
Article 51, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005)
а) посочените в точка А изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2009 г.;
(a) requirements referred to in point A shall apply from1 January 2009;
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2011 г. ;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2011 ;
в) посочените в точка В изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2011 г.
(c) requirements referred to in point C shall apply from 1 January 2011 .
За България и Румъния обаче, молбите съгласно членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 от Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003 са незадължителни до 31 декември 2011 г., доколкото тези разпоредби се отнасят за законоустановените изисквания за управление.
However, for Bulgaria and Romania, the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shall be optional until 31 December 2011 insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
От 1 януари 2012 г. земеделският производител, който получава плащания по схемата за единно плащане на площ, трябва да спазва законоустановените изисквания за управление, посочени в приложение III към Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003 в съответствие със следния график:
As from 1 January 2012 a farmer receiving payments under the single area payment scheme shall respect the statutory management requirements referred to in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 according to the following timetable:
За България и Румъния обаче, прилагането на членове 3, 4, 6, 7 и 9 от Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003 е незадължително до 31 декември 2011 г., доколкото тези разпоредби се отнасят до законоустановените изисквания за управление.
However, for Bulgaria and Romania, the application of Articles 3, 4, 6, 7 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 shall be optional until 31 December 2011 insofar as those provisions relate to statutory management requirements.
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2013 г. ;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2013 ;
б) посочените в точка Б изисквания се прилагат от 1 януари 2014 г. ;
(b) requirements referred to in point B shall apply from 1 January 2014 ;
The introduction of cross compliance was a key element of the 2003 reform of the Common Agriculture Policy.
The introduction of cross compliance was a key element of the 2003 reform of the Common Agriculture Policy.
Cross compliance was made a precondition to public support for farmers.
Cross compliance was made a precondition to public support for farmers.
Herewith changing the first pillar in the direction of rural development policy, as farmers are being paid for services they render to the wider society.
Herewith changing the first pillar in the direction of rural development policy, as farmers are being paid for services they render to the wider society.
Farmers are being compensated for complying with Community legislation in the field of environment, public, animal and plant health and animal welfare, which are generally very strict compared to standards in the rest of the world.
Farmers are being compensated for complying with Community legislation in the field of environment, public, animal and plant health and animal welfare, which are generally very strict compared to standards in the rest of the world.
Though supported widely cross compliance has from the beginning encountered criticism for the bureaucratic burden linked with its application for farmers as well as for Member States administrations.
Though supported widely cross compliance has from the beginning encountered criticism for the bureaucratic burden linked with its application for farmers as well as for Member States administrations.
In addition it is very difficult to concentrate controls with one control body as many different sectors and specialists need to be involved.
In addition it is very difficult to concentrate controls with one control body as many different sectors and specialists need to be involved.
Commissions' implementation rules foresee no advance notice of controls, which, taken into consideration the extent and length of controls as well as today's farming conditions, places a heavy burden on farmers shoulders.
Commissions' implementation rules foresee no advance notice of controls, which, taken into consideration the extent and length of controls as well as today's farming conditions, places a heavy burden on farmers shoulders.
About 68% of cases of non-compliance were considered minor and led to sanctions of 1% of direct payments..
About 68% of cases of non-compliance were considered minor and led to sanctions of 1% of direct payments..
71% of cases of non-compliance concerned labelling and registration of cattle (mostly loss of one ear mark or cases where cattle were registered centrally but not in books kept on the farm, therefore not putting into danger retracebility).
71% of cases of non-compliance concerned labelling and registration of cattle (mostly loss of one ear mark or cases where cattle were registered centrally but not in books kept on the farm, therefore not putting into danger retracebility).
Implementation rules foresaw no procedures for minor cases of non-compliance nor did the system foresee a possibility not to forego sanction in these cases.
Implementation rules foresaw no procedures for minor cases of non-compliance nor did the system foresee a possibility not to forego sanction in these cases.
The sanction system was therefore often deemed disproportionate by farmers as well as discriminating against certain types of farms, notably farms holding animals.
The sanction system was therefore often deemed disproportionate by farmers as well as discriminating against certain types of farms, notably farms holding animals.
Cross compliance is implemented quite differently from one Member State to the other and advisory systems for farmers often do not function in a way to alleviate the burden on farmers.
Cross compliance is implemented quite differently from one Member State to the other and advisory systems for farmers often do not function in a way to alleviate the burden on farmers.
The Commission presented a 'Report on the application of the system of cross-compliance' (COM (2007) 147 fin.) which summarised the criticism.
The Commission presented a 'Report on the application of the system of cross-compliance' (COM (2007) 147 fin.) which summarised the criticism.
The proposed change of regulation (EC) 1782/2003 is part of the Commission´ effort to implement the conclusions of its report.
The proposed change of regulation (EC) 1782/2003 is part of the Commission´ effort to implement the conclusions of its report.
Changes to Commissions implementing rules are presently discussed with the Council.
Changes to Commissions implementing rules are presently discussed with the Council.
Rapporteurs Conclusions
Rapporteurs Conclusions
The rapporteur supports the system of cross compliance as he believes it to be an important instrument for the justification of public support to farmers.
The rapporteur supports the system of cross compliance as he believes it to be an important instrument for the justification of public support to farmers.
Yet, it is clear that a complicated system like cross compliance cannot function without the support of the farmers concerned.
Yet, it is clear that a complicated system like cross compliance cannot function without the support of the farmers concerned.
Therefore the cross compliance system itself, as well as the legislation falling under the scope of cross compliance should be simplified, deregulated and improved continuously.
Therefore the cross compliance system itself, as well as the legislation falling under the scope of cross compliance should be simplified, deregulated and improved continuously.
Looking at the numbers presented by the Commission in its report it is clear that most controlled farms do comply with set standards, the overwhelming number of cases of non-compliance concerning minor or negligible if not superfluous legal requirements.
Looking at the numbers presented by the Commission in its report it is clear that most controlled farms do comply with set standards, the overwhelming number of cases of non-compliance concerning minor or negligible if not superfluous legal requirements.
The rapporteur therefore supports fully any effort to simplify cross compliance as long as the goals pursued are not put into danger.
The rapporteur therefore supports fully any effort to simplify cross compliance as long as the goals pursued are not put into danger.
The Commissions proposal is a clear step forward.
The Commissions proposal is a clear step forward.
Nonetheless some changes are being proposed as to underline that simplification, deregulation, improvement and harmonisation is a continuous process.
Nonetheless some changes are being proposed as to underline that simplification, deregulation, improvement and harmonisation is a continuous process.
I therefore proposed a regular reporting by the Commission focusing also on the costs of the whole controlling system, in order to enable proper cost benefit analysis in the future.
I therefore proposed a regular reporting by the Commission focusing also on the costs of the whole controlling system, in order to enable proper cost benefit analysis in the future.
If all cases of minor non-compliance led to increased controls as foreseen by the Commission this would neither be proportionate nor help Member States to cope with the administrative work-load.
If all cases of minor non-compliance led to increased controls as foreseen by the Commission this would neither be proportionate nor help Member States to cope with the administrative work-load.
Minor changes to the Commission proposal are therefore presented.
Minor changes to the Commission proposal are therefore presented.
Some standards, especially on Nature-2000, are not adapted to a system of systematic-on-the spot-controls.
Some standards, especially on Nature-2000, are not adapted to a system of systematic-on-the spot-controls.
It should therefore be considered to replace systematic controls with a well functioning system of cross-checks (in case of Nature-2000 almost all cases of non-compliance were detected through cross-checks anyway).
It should therefore be considered to replace systematic controls with a well functioning system of cross-checks (in case of Nature-2000 almost all cases of non-compliance were detected through cross-checks anyway).
New Member States that are struggling to put into place a farm administration covering all demands of Europe's extensive farm legislation and who do not yet receive the full amount of public support should be granted a period of phasing-in, shortly longer than proposed by the Commission and in line with the phasing-in of direct payments.
New Member States that are struggling to put into place a farm administration covering all demands of Europe's extensive farm legislation and who do not yet receive the full amount of public support should be granted a period of phasing-in, shortly longer than proposed by the Commission and in line with the phasing-in of direct payments.
The report does not cover all aspects of cross-compliance as many questions are only dealt with in Commission implementation rules and some aspects clearly need to be discussed further.
The report does not cover all aspects of cross-compliance as many questions are only dealt with in Commission implementation rules and some aspects clearly need to be discussed further.
An obligation to report regularly will make sure that cross compliance will stay on the agenda.
An obligation to report regularly will make sure that cross compliance will stay on the agenda.
It is also clear that all parties involved, not only the Commission, but especially Member States need to make sure to put into place a system that fulfils demands of society but is as simple as possible.
It is also clear that all parties involved, not only the Commission, but especially Member States need to make sure to put into place a system that fulfils demands of society but is as simple as possible.
An extension of the current set of standards, as discussed by some in connection with the upcoming health-check of the CAP, could be detrimental to the system overall considering that we are still in an early stage of implementation.
An extension of the current set of standards, as discussed by some in connection with the upcoming health-check of the CAP, could be detrimental to the system overall considering that we are still in an early stage of implementation.
In addition, new administrative and compliance costs linked to direct payments should be eyed with suspicion in the light of decreasing aid for farmers.
In addition, new administrative and compliance costs linked to direct payments should be eyed with suspicion in the light of decreasing aid for farmers.
Схеми за директно подпомагане в рамките на Общата селскостопанска политика (изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 1782/2003) и за подпомагане на развитието на селските райони от Европейския земеделски фонд за развитие на селските райони (ЕЗФРСР) (изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 1698/2005)
Direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)