natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Държавите-членки гарантират, че наказателната отговорност на юридическо лице не се погасява при прекратяване на юридическото лице, а когато причинената вреда и/или извършването на престъплението или проявата на небрежност не са разкрити, съдружниците в юридическото лице, които са били съдружници в същото юридическо лице към момента на извършване или през срока на извършване на престъплението или на проявата на небрежност, носят наказателна и гражданска отговорност.
Member States shall ensure that the criminal liability of a legal person does not cease when the legal person ceases to exist, but that, when the damage caused and/or commission of the offence or negligence is uncovered, the members of the legal person who or which were members of the legal person at the time of commission or during the period of the offence or negligence are liable in criminal and civil law.
По отношение на физическите лица, отговорни за извършването на горепосочените престъпления, държавите-членки предвиждат временно или доживотно лишаване от право да се заема определена държавна или обществена длъжност.
Member States shall ensure that natural persons responsible for the aforementioned acts are temporarily or permanently prohibited from holding public office .
Член 7, параграф 4, уводна част
Article 7, paragraph 4, introductory part
Санкциите, предвидени в този член, са придружени, по целесъобразност , от други санкции или мерки, и по-специално:
The sanctions provided for in this article shall be accompanied , where appropriate, by other sanctions or measures, in particular:
Предохранителни мерки
Precautionary measures
Държавите-членки въвеждат или запазват съществуването на подходящи предохранителни мерки.
Member States shall introduce or maintain appropriate precautionary measures.
Член 9, парагрaф 1, алинея 1
Article 9, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1
Държавите-членки въвеждат в сила законовите, подзаконови и административни разпоредби, необходими за постигане на съответствие с настоящата директива най-късно до [...] .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by [...] at the latest.
Те гарантират, че съответните служби разполагат с достатъчно персонал и обучение, за да могат органите и съдилищата да посрещнат предизвикателството за съществено ограничаване на престъпленията против околната среда.
They shall ensure that the relevant services receive sufficient staffing and training to enable the authorities and the courts to meet the challenge of substantially reducing environmental crime.
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Magor Imre Csibi, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Magor Imre Csibi, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Iles Braghetto, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Genowefa Grabowska, Jutta Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Johannes Lebech, Jiří Maštálka, Alojz Peterle, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Iles Braghetto, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Genowefa Grabowska, Jutta Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Johannes Lebech, Jiří Maštálka, Alojz Peterle, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Luis Herrero-Tejedor
Luis Herrero-Tejedor
The draftsman of the committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs would like to suggest the following remarks to the rapporteur in the Legal Affairs committee with regard to the proposal of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law.
The draftsman of the committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs would like to suggest the following remarks to the rapporteur in the Legal Affairs committee with regard to the proposal of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law.
COM(2007)0051 of 9 February 2007.
COM(2007)0051 of 9 February 2007.
The draftsman is of the opinion that, to a big extent, legislation protecting the environment should be enforced through criminal sanctions since only the latter will have a sufficiently dissuasive and deterrent effect.
The draftsman is of the opinion that, to a big extent, legislation protecting the environment should be enforced through criminal sanctions since only the latter will have a sufficiently dissuasive and deterrent effect.
The current Commission proposal replaces the Proposal for a Directive on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law ( 2001/0076(COD) in order to implement the judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the so called 'environment case'
The current Commission proposal replaces the Proposal for a Directive on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law ( 2001/0076(COD) in order to implement the judgment of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the so called 'environment case'
C-176/03, of 13 September 2005. by which Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA was annulled.
C-176/03, of 13 September 2005. by which Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA was annulled.
In this case the ECJ decided that the Community could take measures relating to the criminal law of the Member States which it considers necessary in order to ensure that the rules concerning environmental protection are fully effective.
In this case the ECJ decided that the Community could take measures relating to the criminal law of the Member States which it considers necessary in order to ensure that the rules concerning environmental protection are fully effective.
It was therefore necessary to withdraw the 2001 proposal and to present a new proposal.
It was therefore necessary to withdraw the 2001 proposal and to present a new proposal.
The new text takes into consideration Articles 1-7 of the annulled Framework Decision as they should have been adopted on the basis of Article 175 EC-Treaty rather than on the basis of Title VI TEU.
The new text takes into consideration Articles 1-7 of the annulled Framework Decision as they should have been adopted on the basis of Article 175 EC-Treaty rather than on the basis of Title VI TEU.
Its aim is to ensure a partial approximation with regard to which serious breach environmental legislation should be considered as criminal offences throughout the EU.
Its aim is to ensure a partial approximation with regard to which serious breach environmental legislation should be considered as criminal offences throughout the EU.
These offences should be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal sanctions and in the most serious cases the level of sanctions is subject to approximation too.
These offences should be punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal sanctions and in the most serious cases the level of sanctions is subject to approximation too.
Recently, on the 23rd of October 2007, the European Court of Justice gave judgment in the so called 'ship-source pollution case'.
Recently, on the 23rd of October 2007, the European Court of Justice gave judgment in the so called 'ship-source pollution case'.
In this case the ECJ confirmed its judgment of 13 September 2005 (the environment case).
In this case the ECJ confirmed its judgment of 13 September 2005 (the environment case).
On the question whether the Community was competent to determine the type and level of criminal penalties that the Member States were required to lay down, however, the ECJ clearly stated that this was not a Community competence
On the question whether the Community was competent to determine the type and level of criminal penalties that the Member States were required to lay down, however, the ECJ clearly stated that this was not a Community competence
Paragraph 70 of the judgment. .
Paragraph 70 of the judgment. .
Much to the regret of the draftsman the ECJ left this last issue without any motivation and it remains unclear how it came to this decision.
Much to the regret of the draftsman the ECJ left this last issue without any motivation and it remains unclear how it came to this decision.
Especially when keeping in mind the logic behind the proposal (trans-boundary nature of environmental crime) this point is disappointing.
Especially when keeping in mind the logic behind the proposal (trans-boundary nature of environmental crime) this point is disappointing.
It means that offenders still are in a position to exploit existing differences between Member States legislation to their advantage (as the level of sanctions that are applied to similar offences in the different Member States are very different) as apparently within the current state of play no approximation on the level of penalties at Community level is allowed.
It means that offenders still are in a position to exploit existing differences between Member States legislation to their advantage (as the level of sanctions that are applied to similar offences in the different Member States are very different) as apparently within the current state of play no approximation on the level of penalties at Community level is allowed.
The draftsman therefore thinks that, in order to effectively protect the environment, approximation of the level of the sanctions is of the utmost importance and regrets that the ECJ did not grant this faculty to the Community.
The draftsman therefore thinks that, in order to effectively protect the environment, approximation of the level of the sanctions is of the utmost importance and regrets that the ECJ did not grant this faculty to the Community.
It remains to be seen what the Lisbon-Treaty (which presumably enters into force in 2009) may bring us on this point as then there is foreseen the possibility to establish minimum rules with regard to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions by means of the co-decision procedure
It remains to be seen what the Lisbon-Treaty (which presumably enters into force in 2009) may bring us on this point as then there is foreseen the possibility to establish minimum rules with regard to the definition of criminal offences and sanctions by means of the co-decision procedure
Article 69 (f) paragraph 2, although the UK, Ireland and Denmark will (along with other Member States) be able to pull the ‘emergency brake’ to block the adoption of criminal law measures concerning. .
Article 69 (f) paragraph 2, although the UK, Ireland and Denmark will (along with other Member States) be able to pull the ‘emergency brake’ to block the adoption of criminal law measures concerning. .
Given the trans-boundary nature of environmental crime, an established set of minimum standards concerning environmental crime and sanctions would be a useful instrument in maintaining a comprehensive and effective environmental protection strategy.
Given the trans-boundary nature of environmental crime, an established set of minimum standards concerning environmental crime and sanctions would be a useful instrument in maintaining a comprehensive and effective environmental protection strategy.
The draftsman would therefore advise to the rapporteur of the Legal Affairs committee to take into consideration the following amendments:
The draftsman would therefore advise to the rapporteur of the Legal Affairs committee to take into consideration the following amendments:
Комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи приканва водещата комисия по правни въпроси да включи в доклада си следните изменения:
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Освен това значителните разлики в степента на санкциите в държавите-членки налагат необходимостта да се предвиди при известни обстоятелства сближаване на тези степени, отговарящи на тежестта на нарушението .
Furthermore, the significant differences in the level of sanctions in the Member States make it necessary to foresee, under certain circumstances, an approximation of those levels corresponding to the seriousness of the offence .
In view of the judgment issued by the European Court of Justice on 27 October 2007, this recital - which alludes to a harmonisation of sanction levels - should preferably be deleted.
In view of the judgment issued by the European Court of Justice on 27 October 2007, this recital - which alludes to a harmonisation of sanction levels - should preferably be deleted.
Това сближаване е особено важно в случаите, в които нарушенията имат тежки последици или са извършени в рамките на престъпни организации , които играят значителна роля в престъпленията спрямо околната среда .
Such an approximation is particularly important where the offences have serious results or the offences are committed in the framework of criminal organisations which play a significant role in environmental crime .
Извършването на тези нарушения в рамките на престъпни организации следва да се счита за утежняващо обстоятелство .
The commission of such offences in the framework of criminal organisations should be regarded as an aggravating circumstance .
This amendment is consistent with the amendment calling for recital 11 to be deleted.
This amendment is consistent with the amendment calling for recital 11 to be deleted.
However, a request should nonetheless be made for the commission of environmental offences in the framework of criminal organisations to be regarded as an aggravating circumstance.
However, a request should nonetheless be made for the commission of environmental offences in the framework of criminal organisations to be regarded as an aggravating circumstance.
This in no way affects the Member States' power to determine the type and the level of sanctions.
This in no way affects the Member States' power to determine the type and the level of sanctions.
a) изпускането, емисията или влагането на известно количество материали или йонизиращо лъчение във въздуха, почвата или водата, което причинява смърт или сериозни увреждания на лице;
(a) the discharge, emission or introduction of a quantity of materials or ionising radiation into air, soil or water, which causes death or serious injury to any person;
In order to be sanctioned as a criminal offence, a determined behaviour shall be necessarily unlawful (i.e., which infringes Community legislation or a law).
In order to be sanctioned as a criminal offence, a determined behaviour shall be necessarily unlawful (i.e., which infringes Community legislation or a law).
Hence, the possibility of sanctioning criminally a behaviour which is not unlawful shall be ruled out.
Hence, the possibility of sanctioning criminally a behaviour which is not unlawful shall be ruled out.
Член 3, буква з а) (нова)
Article 3, point (h a) (new)
за) въвеждането в околната среда на генетично модифицирани организми (ГМО), които не са одобрени от Европейския съюз;
(ha) the introduction into the environment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are not approved by the European Union;
The risks of GMOs to men and environment are hardly known.
The risks of GMOs to men and environment are hardly known.
Therefore no GMOs should be introduced into the environment at all.
Therefore no GMOs should be introduced into the environment at all.
But if they are still introduced into the environment, that should not occur until they have been approved by the European Union.
But if they are still introduced into the environment, that should not occur until they have been approved by the European Union.
If any GMOs are introduced intentionally without having been approved, that should be viewed as a criminal offence.
If any GMOs are introduced intentionally without having been approved, that should be viewed as a criminal offence.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че участието или подбудата към умишлените действия, посочени в член 3, се считат за престъпление.
Member States shall ensure that participation in or instigation of the intentional conduct referred to in Article 3 constitutes a criminal offence.
From a legal point of view, participation or instigation of a negligent behaviour can hardly be considered as a criminal offence.
From a legal point of view, participation or instigation of a negligent behaviour can hardly be considered as a criminal offence.
Only intentional participation and instigation could be considered as such.
Only intentional participation and instigation could be considered as such.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че извършването на нарушенията, посочени в членове 3 и 4, са наказуеми с ефективни, съответстващи и разубеждаващи наказателни санкции.
Member States shall ensure that the commission of the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal sanctions.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че извършването на нарушенията, посочени в членове 3 и 4, са систематично наказуеми с ефективни, съответстващи и разубеждаващи санкции с наказателен характер.
Member Status shall ensure that the commission of the offences referred to in Article 3 and 4 is systematically punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions of a criminal nature .
This wording makes it clearer that the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 must in all cases be punishable by criminal sanctions, although the possibility whereby the Member States may impose additional sanctions of a different kind on top of criminal sanctions must not be excluded (see my amendment to Article 5(5)).
This wording makes it clearer that the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 must in all cases be punishable by criminal sanctions, although the possibility whereby the Member States may impose additional sanctions of a different kind on top of criminal sanctions must not be excluded (see my amendment to Article 5(5)).
Държавите-членки гарантират, че извършването на нарушенията, посочени в член 3, букви б) – з), е наказуемо с максимално наказание от поне между една и три години лишаване от свобода, когато нарушението е извършено със сериозно нехайство и причинява значителни щети на въздуха, почвата, водата, животните или растенията.
Member States shall ensure that the commission of the offences referred to in Article 3 (b) to (h) is punishable by a maximum of at least between one and three years imprisonment where the offence is committed with serious negligence and causes substantial damage to air, soil, water, animals or plants.
In order to render the Commission proposal consistent with the judgment, these paragraphs should be deleted.
In order to render the Commission proposal consistent with the judgment, these paragraphs should be deleted.
б) нарушенията, посочени в член 3, букви б) – е), когато нарушението е извършено със сериозно нехайство и причинява смъртта или сериозни увреждания на лице;
(b) the offences referred to in Article 3 (b) to (f), where the offence is committed with serious negligence and causes the death of or serious injury to a person;
в) нарушенията, посочени в член 3, букви б)—з), когато нарушението е извършено умишлено и причинява значителни щети на въздуха, почвата, водата, животните или растенията;
(c) the offences referred to in Article 3 (b) to (h) where the offence is committed intentionally and causes substantial damage to air, soil, water, animals or plants;
а) нарушението, посочено в член 3, буква а), когато нарушението е извършено умишлено;
(a) the offence referred to in Article 3 (a), where the offence is committed intentionally;
б) нарушенията, посочени в член 3, букви б) – е), когато нарушението е извършено умишлено и причинява смъртта или сериозни увреждания на лице;
(b) the offences referred to in Article 3 (b) to (f) where the offence is committed intentionally and causes the death of or serious injury to a person.
Наказателните санкции , предвидени в този член, могат да бъдат придружени от други санкции или мерки, и по-специално :
The criminal sanctions provided for in this article may be accompanied by other sanctions or measures , in particular :
Тези наказателни санкции могат да бъдат придружени от допълнителни санкции или мерки от административен или гражданскоправен характер, като :
Those criminal sanctions may be accompanied by additional administrative or civil sanctions or measures , such as :
Член 5, параграф 5 a (нов)
Article 5, paragraph 5 a (new)
Държавите-членки гарантират, че извършването на нарушения, посочени в членове 3 и 4, в рамките на престъпна организация, по смисъла на рамковата директива на Съвета [...относно борбата с организираната престъпност ( COM(2005)0006 )], следва да се счита за утежняващо обстоятелство.
The Member States shall ensure that the commission of the offences referred to in Articles 3 and 4 in the framework of a criminal organisation as defined in Council Framework Decision [… on the fight against organised crime ( COM(2005)0006 )] is deemed to be an aggravating circumstance.
A request should be made for the commission of environmental offences in the framework of criminal organisations to be regarded as an aggravating circumstance.
A request should be made for the commission of environmental offences in the framework of criminal organisations to be regarded as an aggravating circumstance.
This in no way affects the Member States' power to determine the type and the level of punishment.
This in no way affects the Member States' power to determine the type and the level of punishment.
а) максимален размер от поне между EUR 300 000 и EUR 500 000 в случаите, в които нарушението, посочено в член 3, букви б) – з), е извършено със сериозно нехайство и причинява значителни щети на въздуха, почвата, водата, животните или растенията.
(a) of a maximum of at least between EUR 300 000 and EUR 500 000 in cases where an offence referred to in Article 3 (b) to (h) is committed with serious negligence and causes substantial damage to air, soil, water, animals or plants.
i) нарушението, посочено в член 3, буква а), е извършено със сериозно нехайство или
i) the offence referred to in Article 3 (a) is committed with serious negligence, or
(ii) нарушение, посочено в член 3, букви б) – з):
(ii) an offence referred to in Article 3 (b) to (h):
(i) нарушение, посочено в член 3, буква а), е извършено умишлено или
(i) an offence referred to in Article 3 (a) is committed intentionally, or
(ii) нарушение, посочено в член 3, букви б) – е), е извършено умишлено и причинява смъртта или сериозни увреждания на лице;
(ii) an offence referred to in Article 3 (b) to (f) is committed intentionally and causes the death or serious injury of a person.