natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
It was decided in plenary sitting in July 2007 to refer the report back to the Committee on Transport in accordance with Rule 168 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
It was decided in plenary sitting in July 2007 to refer the report back to the Committee on Transport in accordance with Rule 168 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure.
In August 2007, the coordinators of the Committee on Transport instructed their rapporteur to re-submit a report on the Commission proposal which was to take into account the aspects which had contributed to rejection of the first report.
In August 2007, the coordinators of the Committee on Transport instructed their rapporteur to re-submit a report on the Commission proposal which was to take into account the aspects which had contributed to rejection of the first report.
Developments in the Council
Developments in the Council
On 2 October 2007 the Council agreed on a general orientation on the Commission proposal.
On 2 October 2007 the Council agreed on a general orientation on the Commission proposal.
It endorsed the idea of a directive with non-binding annexes that were not binding.
It endorsed the idea of a directive with non-binding annexes that were not binding.
The Council would like to restrict the application of the Directive to the Trans-European road network.
The Council would like to restrict the application of the Directive to the Trans-European road network.
Rapporteur's second report: amendments
Rapporteur's second report: amendments
In his second draft the rapporteur took incorporated parts of the general orientation and many amendments tabled by fellow committee members to his first draft.
In his second draft the rapporteur took incorporated parts of the general orientation and many amendments tabled by fellow committee members to his first draft.
This applies particularly to amendments criticizing rules which were allegedly unnecessarily bureaucratic where the substance and applicability of the legislative draft can be improved.
This applies particularly to amendments criticizing rules which were allegedly unnecessarily bureaucratic where the substance and applicability of the legislative draft can be improved.
Thus the Directive should apply not only to the Trans-European road network, but also to motorways (Article I).
Thus the Directive should apply not only to the Trans-European road network, but also to motorways (Article I).
Member States should then decide in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity on whether to extend the provisions of this Directive to other roads.
Member States should then decide in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity on whether to extend the provisions of this Directive to other roads.
From the rapporteur's point of view, the competent entity referred to in Article 2, responsible for establishing and monitoring the guidelines required by the Directive, should be a public, not a private, entity.
From the rapporteur's point of view, the competent entity referred to in Article 2, responsible for establishing and monitoring the guidelines required by the Directive, should be a public, not a private, entity.
Nevertheless, bodies already existing as competent entities before the entry into force of this Directive should be able to continue to play this role.
Nevertheless, bodies already existing as competent entities before the entry into force of this Directive should be able to continue to play this role.
Your rapporteur therefore takes the view that Annexes I, II and III should be binding.
Your rapporteur therefore takes the view that Annexes I, II and III should be binding.
If the Annexes containing the essential provisions of this Directive were not binding, serious doubts would arise about the practicality of this Directive.
If the Annexes containing the essential provisions of this Directive were not binding, serious doubts would arise about the practicality of this Directive.
On the other hand, your rapporteur is able to agree to some streamlining of the Commission proposal.
On the other hand, your rapporteur is able to agree to some streamlining of the Commission proposal.
The provisions governing the management of the existing road network (Article 5) for example, were simplified.
The provisions governing the management of the existing road network (Article 5) for example, were simplified.
It is not absolutely necessary to make it incumbent upon Member States to evaluate dangerous sections of road, the potential of the remedial measures listed in Annex III, 3 (e) and (f) and the costs of remedial measures.
It is not absolutely necessary to make it incumbent upon Member States to evaluate dangerous sections of road, the potential of the remedial measures listed in Annex III, 3 (e) and (f) and the costs of remedial measures.
It is sufficient if a member of the team of experts, provided for in Article 5, paragraph 2, meets the requirements of Article 9, paragraph 4 (a).
It is sufficient if a member of the team of experts, provided for in Article 5, paragraph 2, meets the requirements of Article 9, paragraph 4 (a).
The most important aspect of the safety inspections referred to in Article 6 is that it should be carried out on a regular basis.
The most important aspect of the safety inspections referred to in Article 6 is that it should be carried out on a regular basis.
It is, however, equally necessary that these inspections be the subject of a written report pointing to safety-related shortcomings.
It is, however, equally necessary that these inspections be the subject of a written report pointing to safety-related shortcomings.
It is unnecessary to issue new guidelines to support the competent entities, if such guidelines already exist (Article 8, paragraph 1).
It is unnecessary to issue new guidelines to support the competent entities, if such guidelines already exist (Article 8, paragraph 1).
In reformulating the criteria in Annexes I, II and III, your rapporteur took into account as far as possible the Council's proposals.
In reformulating the criteria in Annexes I, II and III, your rapporteur took into account as far as possible the Council's proposals.
относно предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за управление на безопасността на пътната инфраструктура
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on road infrastructure safety management
However, for road safety infrastructure, no such joint effort has yet been carried out at European level.
However, for road safety infrastructure, no such joint effort has yet been carried out at European level.
Комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика приканва водещата комисия по транспорт и туризъм да включи в доклада си следните изменения:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(4а) Научн ите изследван ия са жизнено важен инструмент за подобряване на безопасността на пътищата в Европа.
(4a) Research is a vital instrument in improving safety on European roads.
(5а) С цел по-нататъшно повишава не на безопасността на съществуващите пътища следва да се отчетат негативните въздействия , особено на тежк отоварни превозни средства с общо тегло до 60 тона и дължина максимум 25,25 метра, които водят до многобройни рискове, свързани с безопасността.
(5a) In order to improve the safety performance of existing roads further, the adverse impact of particularly heavy vehicles with a total weight of up to 60 tonnes and a maximum length of 25,25 metres which pose many safety risks should be taken into account.
At the moment, more than 15 different road infrastructure safety projects are financed by the Commission.
So-called Gigaliners and Megatrucks are endangering safety on Europe’s roads.
These projects generate very useful knowledge and exchange of best practices.
Many motorways have no retention systems capable of withstanding a collision with these vehicles.
(8а) С цел увеличаване на безопасността на европейските пътища, които не са част от Трансевропейската пътна мрежа, следва да се установи по-съгласуван обмен между държавите-членки на най-добрите практики, включващ съществуващи проекти за безопасност на пътната инфраструктура и доказани технологии на пътната безопасност, като монтирани светлоотразители като част от пътната маркировка.
(8a) In order to improve the safety of roads within the European Union that are not part of the Trans-European road network, a coherent system for the exchange of best practice between Member States should be established, covering, inter alia, existing road infrastructure safety projects and proven road safety technology such as the embedded road-marking reflectors known as cats' eyes .
Освен това, Комисията следва своевременно да направи оценка на настоящата директива и съответно да предложи разширяване на приложното й поле с цел да бъдат обхванати всички други пътища в държавите-членки, за които такива изисквания се считат за необходими.
The Commission should timely evaluate this Directive in order to establish whether its scope should be broadened to include all major roads in the Member States, having particular regard to vulnerable road users .
Комисията анализира докладите и получената информация и преразглежда настоящата директива с цел определяне дали нейното приложно поле трябва да се разшири, за да обхване основните пътища в държавите-членки, като вземе по-специално предвид уязвимите ползватели на пътищата.
The Commission shall analyse the reports and information obtained and shall review this Directive in order to establish whether its scope should be broadened to include all major roads in the Member States, having particular regard to vulnerable road users.
Best available know-how should therefore be taken into account when analysing alternatives
Best available know-how should therefore be taken into account when analysing alternatives.
Приложение I, параграф 1, буква га)
Annex I, point 2, point (d a)
г а) необходимост от подобряване или изграждане на пешеходни пътеки и алеи за велосипедисти;
(d a) any need for improvement or construction of pedestrians' paths and cycle lanes;
Приложение III, параграф 3, буква е), тире 10 а (ново)
Annex III, point 3, point (f), indent 10 a (new)
- използване и проверка на интелигентни пътни знаци и приемни системи за интегрирано предаване на ограничения за скоростта на превозните средства.
– use and testing of intelligent road signs and reception systems for the integrated transmission of speed limits to vehicles.
Telematics and the use of Intelligent Transport Systems can play an important role in making road infrastructures safer and should therefore be considered as potential remedial measures.
Using intelligent road signs for the automatic transmission of speed limits to passing vehicles is a relatively straightforward technology but it can mean a substantial increase in safety.
- въвеждането на хармонизирани по отношение на функционирането и сигнализацията телематични услуги за трансевропейск ата транспортна мреж а , както и въвеждане на системи за интелигентен транспорт.
– installation of telematics services harmonised for operational and signage purposes for Trans-European Transport Network roads and installation of intelligent transport systems.
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Brigitte Fouré, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Brigitte Fouré, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
PE 400.639v01-00
PE 400.639v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2007)0572 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0572 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2, член 37 и член 152, точка 4, буква б) от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0334/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2), 37 and 152(4)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0334/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните ( A6‑0051/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0051/2008 ),
Предложение за регламент – акт за изменение
Proposal for a regulation – amending act
Член 1 – точка 1
Article 1 - point 1
Член 6 – параграф 1 – уводна фраза
Article 6 – paragraph 1– introductory phrase
До 31 август 2009 г., влизането на домашни любимци, включени в част А от приложение I на територията на Ирландия, Малта, Швеция и Обединеното кралство подлежи на следните изисквания:
Until 31 August 2009 , the entry of the pet animals listed in Part A of Annex I into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom shall be subject to the following requirements:
До 30 юни 2010 г., влизането на домашни любимци, включени в част А от приложение I на територията на Ирландия, Малта, Швеция и Обединеното кралство подлежи на следните изисквания:
Until 30 June 2010 , the entry of the pet animals listed in Part A of Annex I into the territory of Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom shall be subject to the following requirements:
The proposed extension of the transitional period may not be sufficiently long to obtain agreement on a successor regime and a longer one is more appropriate given there is still no proposal on the table and the European Parliament will be dissolved for elections in 2009.
The proposed extension of the transitional period may not be sufficiently long to obtain agreement on a successor regime and a longer one is more appropriate given there is still no proposal on the table and the European Parliament will be dissolved for elections in 2009.
Член 1 – точка 2
Article 1 - point 2
Член 16 – параграф 1
Article 16 – paragraph 1
До 31 август 2009 г., Финландия, Ирландия, Малта, Швеция и Обединеното кралство, по отношение на ехинококозата, и Ирландия и Обединеното кралство, по отношение на кърлежите, могат да въведат специални правила за контрол за влизането на домашни любимци на тяхна територия, които да се прилагат от датата, на която настоящият регламент влиза в сила.
Until 31 August 2009 , Finland, Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom, as regards echinococcosis, and Ireland and the United Kingdom, as regards ticks, may make the entry of pet animals into their territory subject to compliance with the special rules in place on the date on which this Regulation comes into force.
До 30 юни 2010 г., Финландия, Ирландия, Малта, Швеция и Обединеното кралство, по отношение на ехинококозата, и Ирландия , Малта и Обединеното кралство, по отношение на кърлежите, могат да въведат специални правила за контрол за влизането на домашни любимци на тяхна територия, които да се прилагат от датата, на която настоящият регламент влиза в сила.
Until 30 June 2010 , Finland, Ireland, Malta, Sweden and the United Kingdom, as regards echinococcosis, and Ireland , Malta and the United Kingdom, as regards ticks, may make the entry of pet animals into their territory subject to compliance with the special rules in place on the date on which this Regulation comes into force.
This amendment aims at completing the list of countries applying already special requirements concerning ticks with Malta.
This amendment aims at completing the list of countries applying already special requirements concerning ticks with Malta.
By mistake in the Commission proposal the name of Malta had not been mentioned amongst those Member States having already a special regime in place regarding anti-tick treatment.
By mistake in the Commission proposal the name of Malta had not been mentioned amongst those Member States having already a special regime in place regarding anti-tick treatment.
Член 1 – точка 3
Article 1 - point 3
(3) В член 23, датата „1 януари 2008 г.“ се заменя с датата „ 1 септември 2009 г.“
(3) In Article 23, the date "1 January 2008"' is replaced by the date " 1 September 2009 ".
(3) В член 23, датата „1 януари 2008 г.“ се заменя с датата „ 1 юли 2010 г.“
(3) In Article 23, the date "1 January 2008"' is replaced by the date " 1 July 2010 ".
see justification to amendment to Article 1 - point 1.
see justification to amendment to Article 1 - point 1.
Regulation (EC) NO.998/2003 harmonises the rules for the non-commercial movements of pet animals between Member States or after entry or re-entry into the Community from third countries.
Regulation (EC) NO.998/2003 harmonises the rules for the non-commercial movements of pet animals between Member States or after entry or re-entry into the Community from third countries.
This Regulation introduced amongst others the pet passport for cats, dogs and ferrets when moving from one Member State to another and which has to carry the proof i.a. that the animal has been vaccinated against rabies.
This Regulation introduced amongst others the pet passport for cats, dogs and ferrets when moving from one Member State to another and which has to carry the proof i.a. that the animal has been vaccinated against rabies.
The Regulation provides however for temporary derogations which some Member States can apply until 3 July 2008 (Art 6(1) and 16).
The Regulation provides however for temporary derogations which some Member States can apply until 3 July 2008 (Art 6(1) and 16).
Article 6(3) provides the possibility to extend this transitional period by way of legislation but this should be based on a report by the European Commission to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council (Article 23) before 1 February 2007.
Article 6(3) provides the possibility to extend this transitional period by way of legislation but this should be based on a report by the European Commission to be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council (Article 23) before 1 February 2007.
This report could not be submitted in due time .Pending the submission of the report but also given the time needed for a possible, more comprehensive review of the Regulation the Commission proposes to extend the current derogations until 31 August 2009.
This report could not be submitted in due time .Pending the submission of the report but also given the time needed for a possible, more comprehensive review of the Regulation the Commission proposes to extend the current derogations until 31 August 2009.
Margrete Auken, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Margrete Auken, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Miroslav Ouzký, Guido Sacconi, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
относно предложение за препоръка на Европейския парламент до Съвета относно ролята на Европейския съюз в Ирак
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the European Union's role in Iraq
PE 394.095v02-00
PE 394.095v02-00
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА ПРЕПОРЪКА НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ ДО СЪВЕТА (B6-0328/2007) 19
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL (B6-0328/2007)...............17
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по международна търговия ..........................21
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................19
относно ролята на Европейския съюз в Ирак
on the European Union's role in Iraq
– като взе предвид предложението за препоръка до Съвета, внесено от Ana Maria Gomes от името на групата PSE относно ролята на Европейския съюз в Ирак ( B6-0328/2007 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council tabled by Ana Maria Gomes on behalf of the PSE Group on the European Union's role in Iraq ( B6‑0328/2007 ),
– като взе предвид предишните си резолюции относно Ирак, и съвсем наскоро тази от 25 октомври 2007 г
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Iraq, most recently that of 25 October 2007
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0481 . .
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0481 . ,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 12 юли 2007 г. относно хуманитарната ситуация на иракските бежанци
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on the humanitarian situation of Iraqi refugees
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0357 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0357 . ,
– като взе предвид решенията от своя Председателски съвет от 15 ноември и този от 6 декември 2007 г. относно състава и изпращането на „специална делегация за връзките с Ирак“,
– having regard to the decisions of its Conference of Presidents of 15 November and 6 December 2007 on the composition and the remit of an 'ad hoc delegation for relations with Iraq',
– като взе предвид заключенията на Съвета по общи въпроси и външни отношения относно намесата на ЕС в Ирак, проведен на 23 и 24 април, 15 и 16 октомври и на 19 и 20 ноември 2007 г.,
– having regard to the General Affairs and External Relations Council conclusions on EU involvement in Iraq of 23-24 April, 15-16 October and 19-20 November 2007,
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията от 7 юни 2006 г., озаглавено „Препоръки за възобновен ангажимент на Европейския съюз към Ирак“ (СОМ (2006)0283),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 7 June 2006 entitled 'Recommendations for renewed European Union engagement with Iraq' ( COM(2006)0283 ),
– като взе предвид Международния пакт с Ирак, приет в Шарм ел-Шейх, Египет, на 3 май 2007 г.,
– having regard to the International Compact with Iraq, launched in Sharm el-Sheik, Egypt, on 3 May 2007,
– като взе предвид резолюциите на Съвета за сигурност на ООН – 1546 (2004 г.), 1770 (2007 г.) и 1790 (2007 г.), и по-специално приложения І и ІІ към последната,
– having regard to Resolutions 1546 (2004) , 1770 (2007) and 1790 (2007), particularly Annexes I and II thereto, of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC),
– като взе предвид Съвместната дейност на Съвета 2005/190/ОВППС от 7 март 2005 г. относно интегрираната мисия на ЕС в Ирак за подкрепа на правовата държава EUJUST LEX
– having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP of 7 March 2005 on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX
– като взе предвид Европейската стратегия за сигурност от 2003 г. относно „Сигурна Европа в един по-добър свят“ от 12 декември 2003 г.,
– having regard to the 2003 European Security Strategy on 'A secure Europe in a better world' of 12 December 2003,
– като взе предвид Европейския консенсус за развитие от 22 ноември 2005 г.,
– having regard to the European Consensus on Development of 22 November 2005,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 1 юни 2006 г. относно жените във въоръжените конфликти и тяхната роля в следконфликтното възстановяване
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on women in armed conflicts and their role in post-conflict reconstruction