natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Без да бъдат нарушавани специалните критерии, определени предварително от държавите-членки, за предоставяне на права на ползване на радиочестоти от доставчици на радио и телевизионно съдържание с оглед постигане на цели от общ интерес в съответствие с правото на Общността, такива права на ползване се предоставят чрез обективни, прозрачни, не допускащи дискриминация и пропорционални процедури и, в случая на радиочестотите, в съответствие с разпоредбите на член 9 от Директива 2002/21/ЕО (Рамкова директива).
Without prejudice to specific criteria defined in advance by Member States to grant rights of use of radio frequencies to providers of radio or television broadcast content services with a view to pursuing ge.9.neral interest objectives in conformity with Community law, such rights of use shall be granted through objective, transparent, non‑discriminatory and proportionate procedures, and, in the case of radio frequencies, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).
Процедурите също така са отворени, освен в случаи, когато предоставянето на индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти на доставчици на радио- и телевизионно съдържание може да се окаже съществено за изпълнение на дадено задължение, определено предварително от държавата-членка, което е необходимо за постигане на цел от общ интерес в съответствие с правото на Общността.
The procedures shall also be open, except in cases where the granting of individual rights of use for radio frequencies to the providers of radio or television broadcast content services can be shown to be essential to meet a particular obligation defined in advance by the Member State which is necessary to achieve a general interest objective in conformity with Community law.
Без да бъдат нарушавани специалните критерии и процедури, приети от държавите-членки, за предоставяне на права на ползване на радиочестоти от доставчици на радио и телевизионно съдържание с оглед постигане на цели от общ интерес в съответствие с правото на Общността, такива права на ползване се предоставят чрез обективни, прозрачни, не допускащи дискриминация и пропорционални процедури и, в случая на радиочестотите, в съответствие с разпоредбите на член 9 от Директива 2002/21/ЕО (Рамкова директива).
Without prejudice to specific criteria and procedures adopted by Member States to grant rights of use of radio frequencies to providers of radio or television broadcast content services with a view to pursuing general interest objectives in conformity with Community law, such rights of use shall be granted through objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate procedures, and, in the case of radio frequencies, in accordance with the provisions of Article 9 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive).
Член 5 – параграф 2 – алинея 5 a (нова)
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5 a (new)
При вземането на решение относно правата на ползване се отчита надлежно необходимостта от определяне на съответен период на амортизация на инвестицията.
In taking a decision on rights of use, due account shall be taken of the need to allow for an appropriate amortisation period for investment.
For many new platforms and services, investment will need to be amortized over a period exceeding ten or, at any rate, five years.
For many new platforms and services, investment will need to be amortized over a period exceeding ten or, at any rate, five years.
It is not uncommon to have to sustain substantial losses during the first couple of years of operation.
It is not uncommon to have to sustain substantial losses during the first couple of years of operation.
It would be disproportionate to introduce a rigid requirement for national regulatory authorities to conduct a formal review of all spectrum licenses every five years.
It would be disproportionate to introduce a rigid requirement for national regulatory authorities to conduct a formal review of all spectrum licenses every five years.
Решенията относно права на ползване се вземат, съобщават и публикуват във възможно най-кратки срокове след получаването в националните регулаторни органи на пълна молба в триседмичен срок за номера, разпределени за специфични цели в националния номерационен план, и в шестседмичен срок за радиочестоти, разпределени за специфични цели в националния честотен план..
Decisions on rights of use shall be taken, communicated and made public as soon as possible after receipt of the complete application by the national regulatory authority, within three weeks in the case of numbers that have been allocated for specific purposes within the national numbering plan and within six weeks in the case of radio frequencies that have been allocated for specific purposes within the national frequency plan.
Член 5 – параграф 4 – алинея 1
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1
Когато, след съгласуване със заинтересованите страни, в съответствие с разпоредбите на член 6 от Директива 2002/21/ЕО („Рамкова директива“) е взето решение, че правата за използване на номера от изключителна икономическа стойност ще се предоставят чрез конкурсни или сравнителни процедури за подбор, държавите-членки могат да удължат още максималния триседмичен срок с три седмици.
Where it has been decided, after consultation with interested parties in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive), that rights for use of numbers of exceptional economic value are to be granted through competitive or comparative selection procedures, Member States may extend the maximum period of three weeks by up to three weeks.
Когато, след съгласуване със заинтересованите страни, в съответствие с разпоредбите на член 6 от Директива 2002/21/ЕО („Рамкова директива“) е взето решение, че правата за използване на номера от изключителна икономическа стойност ще се предоставят чрез конкурсни или сравнителни процедури за подбор, държавите-членки могат да удължат още максималния триседмичен срок с допълнителен срок от три седмици.
Where it has been decided, after consultation with interested parties in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive), that rights for use of numbers of exceptional economic value are to be granted through competitive or comparative selection procedures, Member States may extend the maximum period of three weeks by a further period of up to three weeks.
Член 5 – параграф 5
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Държавите-членки вземат предвид заварените инвестиции и равнището на конкуренция.
Member States shall take into account legacy investments and the level of competition.
Safeguard for making sure that legacy investments are taken into due account.
Safeguard for making sure that legacy investments are taken into due account.
Otherwise former investments might be devalued.
Otherwise former investments might be devalued.
This would severely distort the market and would negatively affect future investment decisions.
This would severely distort the market and would negatively affect future investment decisions.
Член 6 а – параграф 1 – алинея 1 – встъпителна част
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
С цел постигане на целите, установени в член 1, и без засягане на разпоредбите на член 5, параграф 2 от настоящата директива и на Решението за радиочестотния спектър , Комисията може да приеме мерки за изпълнение:
In order to achieve the objectives set out in Article 1, and without prejudice to Article 5(2) of this Directive and the Radio Spectrum Decision , the Commission may adopt implementing measures:
The reference to the Radio Spectrum Decision is crucial to achieve an integrated policy approach and coherent treatment of harmonisation measures.
The reference to the Radio Spectrum Decision is crucial to achieve an integrated policy approach and coherent treatment of harmonisation measures.
Член 6a – параграф 1 – алинея 1 – буква а
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a
а) за идентифициране на честотни ленти, чиято употреба да подлежи на общи разрешения или индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти;
(a) to identify radio frequency bands the use of which is to be made subject to general authorisations or individual rights of use for radio frequencies;
а) за идентифициране на честотни ленти, осигуряващи паневропейски мрежи или електронни съобщителни услуги, чиято употреба да подлежи на общи разрешения или индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти;
(a) to identify radio frequency bands providing pan-European networks or electronic communications services, the use of which is to be made subject to general authorisations or individual rights of use for radio frequencies;
The scope of the article is far to open.
The scope of the article is far to open.
Moreover, the wording is not in line with the principle of checks and balance.
Moreover, the wording is not in line with the principle of checks and balance.
It is important to ensure that Member States’ competences regarding frequencies are not undermined by new centralized procedures at EU level.
It is important to ensure that Member States’ competences regarding frequencies are not undermined by new centralized procedures at EU level.
Insofar it is appropriate to refer this article to pan-European services.
Insofar it is appropriate to refer this article to pan-European services.
Член 6a – параграф 1 – алинея 1 – буква в
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c
в) за хармонизиране на процедурите за предоставяне на общи разрешения или индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти , осигуряващи паневропейски мрежи или електронни съобщителни услуги, или на номера;
(c) to harmonise procedures for the granting of general authorisations or individual rights of use for radio frequencies providing pan-European networks or electronic communications services or numbers;
Член 6a – параграф 1 – алинея 1 – буква г
Article 6a – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d
г) за хармонизиране на условията, посочени в приложение II, свързани с общи разрешения или индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти или номера;
(d) to harmonise the conditions specified in Annex II relating to general authorisations or individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers;
It should be left to subsidiarity how conditions relating to general authorisations or individual rights of use should be defined in each Member State.
It should be left to subsidiarity how conditions relating to general authorisations or individual rights of use should be defined in each Member State.
Член 6a – параграф 1 – алинея 1 – буква е
Article 6a – paragraph 1 –subparagraph 1 – point f
е) за установяване на процедури за подбор на предприятия, осигуряващи паневропейски мрежи или електронни съобщителни услуги, на които да се предоставят индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти или номера от националните регулаторни органи, когато е приложимо в съответствие с разпоредбите на член 6б.
(f) to lay down procedures for the selection of undertakings providing pan-European networks or electronic communications services to which individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers shall be granted by the national regulatory authorities, where appropriate in accordance with the provisions of Article 6b.
Член 6 б
Article 6 b
Техническата мярка за изпълнение, посочена в член 6а, параграф 1, буква е) може да позволи на Групата по политиката в областта на радиочестотния спектър (RSPG) да прави предложения за подбора на предприятия, осигуряващи паневропейски мрежи или електронни съобщителни услуги , на които следва да бъдат предоставени индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти или номера, в съответствие с член 12 от Регламент [..].
The technical implementing measure referred to in paragraph 6a(1)(f) may provide for the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG) to make proposals for the selection of undertaking(s) providing pan-European networks or electronic communications services to which individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers are to be granted, in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation [...].
В такива случаи мярката посочва периода, в рамките на който Групата по политиката в областта на радиочестотния спектър (RSPG) приключва подбора, процедурата, правилата и условията, приложими за подбора, и подробности за всякакви такси, налагани на притежатели на права на ползване на радиочестоти и/или номера, с цел гарантиране на оптималната употреба на спектъра или номерационните ресурси.
In such cases, the measure shall specify the period within which the RSPG shall complete the selection, the procedure, rules and conditions applicable to the selection, and details of any charges and fees to be imposed on the holders of rights for use of radio frequencies and/or numbers, in order to ensure the optimal use of spectrum or numbering resources.
Отчитайки в максимална степен становището на Органа , Комисията приема мярка за подбор на предприятията, на които да се издадат индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти или номера.
Taking the utmost account of the opinion of the Authority , the Commission shall adopt a measure selecting the undertaking(s) to which individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers shall be issued.
Отчитайки в максимална степен становището на Групата по политиката в областта на радиочестотния спектър (RSPG) , Комисията приема мярка за подбор на предприятията, осигуряващи паневропейски мрежи или електронни съобщителни услуги, на които да се издадат индивидуални права на ползване на радиочестоти или номера.
Taking the utmost account of the opinion of the RSPG , the Commission shall adopt a measure selecting the undertaking(s) providing pan-European networks or electronic communications services to which individual rights of use for radio frequencies or numbers shall be issued.
The Authority should not have competence over spectrum policy and this should remain with the RSPG.
The Authority should not have competence over spectrum policy and this should remain with the RSPG.
Article 6 b is not in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
Article 6 b is not in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
Член 3 – точка 13
Article 3 – point 13
Без да се засягат разпоредбите на член 9а от Директива 2002/21/ЕО (Рамкова директива), държавите-членки могат да приравняват общите разрешения и права за ползване , които вече съществуват към датата на влизането в сила на настоящата директива, в съответствие с членове 5, 6 и 7 и приложение I към настоящата директива най-късно до.... *.
Without prejudice to Article 9a of Directive 2002/21/EC (Framework Directive), Member States may bring general authorisations and rights of use already in existence on the date of entry into force of this Directive into conformity with Articles 5, 6, 7, and Annex I of this Directive by ...* .
* две години от датата на влизане ва сила на настоящата директива.
* Two years from the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Приложението се заличава
Annex deleted
Consequence of deletion of article 6a.1(d).
Consequence of deletion of article 6a.1(d).
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, David Casa, Manuel António dos Santos, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Andrea Losco, Astrid Lulling, Florencio Luque Aguilar, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, Ieke van den Burg, Cornelis Visser
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, David Casa, Manuel António dos Santos, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Guntars Krasts, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Andrea Losco, Astrid Lulling, Florencio Luque Aguilar, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Bernhard Rapkay, Dariusz Rosati, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ivo Strejček, Ieke van den Burg, Cornelis Visser
Dragoş Florin David, Mia De Vits, Harald Ettl, Ján Hudacký, Janusz Lewandowski, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan
Dragoş Florin David, Mia De Vits, Harald Ettl, Ján Hudacký, Janusz Lewandowski, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan
относно предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета, за изменение на Директиви 2002/21/ЕО относно общата регулаторна рамка за електронните съобщителни мрежи и услуги, 2002/19/ЕО относно достъпа до електронни съобщителни мрежи и тяхната инфраструктура и взаимосвързаността между тях и 2002/20/ЕО относно разрешението на електронните съобщителни мрежи и услуги
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and services, and 2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
This proposal amends the Framework
This proposal amends the Framework
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) , Authorisation
Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) , Authorisation
Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) and Access
Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) and Access
Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) Directives, which the Commission proposed in November 2007.
Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (OJ L 108, 24.4.2002) Directives, which the Commission proposed in November 2007.
Your Draftsman welcomes the 'Better Regulation' proposals in the package with strong support overall since the package is very important in improving a true European internal market in the field of telecommunication.
Your Draftsman welcomes the 'Better Regulation' proposals in the package with strong support overall since the package is very important in improving a true European internal market in the field of telecommunication.
The aim of the package is to enhance investment, innovation and consumer benefits in electronic communications, in other words to support and further develop a regulatory framework for the digital economy that is future-proof, market-oriented and exploits the advantages brought by the completion of the internal market, which your Draftsman also strongly supports.
The aim of the package is to enhance investment, innovation and consumer benefits in electronic communications, in other words to support and further develop a regulatory framework for the digital economy that is future-proof, market-oriented and exploits the advantages brought by the completion of the internal market, which your Draftsman also strongly supports.
Although your Draftsman welcomes the proposal on common regulatory framework for networks and services, access, interconnection and authorisation of electronic communications, he is of the opinion that there is scope for improvement.
Although your Draftsman welcomes the proposal on common regulatory framework for networks and services, access, interconnection and authorisation of electronic communications, he is of the opinion that there is scope for improvement.
Spectrum Management
Spectrum Management
The EU needs to rapidly move on to better forms of spectrum management which combine openness, flexibility and harmonization.
The EU needs to rapidly move on to better forms of spectrum management which combine openness, flexibility and harmonization.
There is a clear need for flexibility in spectrum utilisation and maximised efficiency.
There is a clear need for flexibility in spectrum utilisation and maximised efficiency.
A ‘harmonized’ view of spectrum management, which would bring 27 different national spectrum management schemes into line, would be useful to improve pan-European and cross-border services.
A ‘harmonized’ view of spectrum management , which would bring 27 different national spectrum management schemes into line, would be useful to improve pan-European and cross-border services.
A single spectrum regime returns technology and services benefits to users and thus economic and social and benefits (e.g. in volume production of standard equipment, lowering prices and the barrier to entry for new users).
A single spectrum regime returns technology and services benefits to users and thus economic and social and benefits (e.g. in volume production of standard equipment, lowering prices and the barrier to entry for new users).
In that respect, attention should be paid to frequency management and network planning to avoid interferences as far as possible, as technology neutral harmonisation can not solve the problems of interference.
In that respect, attention should be paid to frequency management and network planning to avoid interferences as far as possible, as technology neutral harmonisation can not solve the problems of interference.
The introduction by the Commission of flexibility in assignment of spectrum to a specific technology or services is welcomed by your draftsman .
The introduction by the Commission of flexibility in assignment of spectrum to a specific technology or services is welcomed by your draftsman.
Allowing more flexible uses will lead to more innovation and consumer benefit.
Allowing more flexible uses will lead to more innovation and consumer benefit.
However, some bands may need to be reserved for one application across the EU (emergency services, for example) so caution with technical and service neutrality may be necessary.
However, some bands may need to be reserved for one application across the EU (emergency services, for example) so caution with technical and service neutrality may be necessary.
Therefore, a gradual approach, rather than a revolutionary reform seems preferable.
Therefore, a gradual approach, rather than a revolutionary reform seems preferable.
While technology neutrality will lead to innovative and technology developments, to the benefit of the consumer, it should be complemented by trading to ensure competition.
While technology neutrality will lead to innovative and technology developments, to the benefit of the consumer, it should be complemented by trading to ensure competition.
The Commission seeks to add market-based spectrum trading with secondary trading and auctions to the 'traditional method'.
The Commission seeks to add market-based spectrum trading with secondary trading and auctions to the 'traditional method'.
Spectrum trading by itself does not necessarily improve flexibility in spectrum use.
Spectrum trading by itself does not necessarily improve flexibility in spectrum use.
It should however ease access to the spectrum and lead to more intensive (hence more valuable) use of the spectrum.
It should however ease access to the spectrum and lead to more intensive (hence more valuable) use of the spectrum.
Therefore, your Draftsman supports the establishment of tradability of rights of use throughout the EU for selected bands, when individual rights of use are granted.
Therefore, your Draftsman supports the establishment of tradability of rights of use throughout the EU for selected bands, when individual rights of use are granted.