natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Тази мярка, предназначена да измени несъществени елементи на настоящия регламент, като го допълва, се приема в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране с контрол, посочена в член 23, параграф 3 .
That measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Regulation by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 23(3) .
Приложение – раздел 5.17 – точка 4
Annex – section 5.17 – point 4
Окончателна специфична мярка за изменение, спиране или отнемане на разрешение се приема от Комисията.
A final specific measure on the modification, suspension or revocation of the authorisation shall be adopted by the Commission.
Поради императивни причини за спешност, Комисията може да използва процедурата по спешност, предвидена в член 23, параграф 5.
On imperative grounds of urgency, the Commission may use the urgent procedure referred to in Article 23(5).
Приложение – раздел 5.17 – точка 6 – буква б
Annex – section 5.17 – point 6 – point b
Член 23 – параграф 4
Article 23 – paragraph 4
Приложение – раздел 6.4 – точка 1 а (нова)
Annex – section 6.4 – point 1a (new)
Директива 2004/36/EO
Directive 2004/36/EC
(1а) В член 8, параграф 2 се заменя със следния текст:
(1a) In Article 8, paragraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:
„На базата на информацията, събрана по параграф 1, Комисията може :
" On the basis of the information collected under paragraph 1, the Commission may :
а) в съответствие с процедурата от член 10, параграф 2, да предприеме всички необходими мерки за улесняване на въвеждането на членове 3, 4 и 5, като:
a) in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 10(2), take any appropriate measures to facilitate the implementation of Articles 3, 4 and 5 such as:
– уточняване на съдържанието на наземните инспекции и процедурите за извършването им,
– detail the content of, and procedures for, ramp inspections;
– дефиниране на формата за съхраняване и разпространяване на данни,
– define the format for the storage and dissemination of data ;
б) да предприеме следните мерки:
b) take the following measures:
– изготвяне на списък с информацията, която трябва да се събира,
– establish the list of information to be collected;
– създаване или подпомагане на вече създадени съответни органи за управление и работа със средствата, необходими за събиране и обмен на информация.
– create or support the appropriate bodies for managing or operating the tools necessary for the collection and exchange of information.
Тези мерки, предназначени да изменят несъществени елементи на настоящата директива, като я допълват, се приемат в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране с контрол, посочена в член 10, параграф 4.“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 10(4). "
Establishing the list of information to be collected and creating or supporting the appropriate bodies are measures of general scope falling under the criteria of the RPS.
Establishing the list of information to be collected and creating or supporting the appropriate bodies are measures of general scope falling under the criteria of the RPS.
Приложение – раздел 6.6 – точка -1 (нова)
Annex – section 6.6 – point -1 (new)
Директива 2004/54/EO
Directive 2004/54/EC
Член 13 – параграф 3
Article 13 – paragraph 3
(-1) В член 13, параграф 3 се заменя със следния текст:
(-1) In Article 13, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
Ако е необходимо, тя прави предложения за приемането на съвместна и уеднаквена методология за анализ на рисковете.
Where necessary, it shall make proposals for a common harmonised risk analysis methodology.
Тези мерки, предназначени да изменят несъществени елементи на настоящата директива, като я допълват, се приемат в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране с контрол, посочена в член 17, параграф 3.“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 17(3). "
Measures concerning adoption of a common harmonised risk analysis methodology should be adopted under RPS.
Measures concerning adoption of a common harmonised risk analysis methodology should be adopted under RPS.
Приложение – раздел 6.7 – точка 1 а (нова)
Annex – section 6.7 – point 1 a (new)
(1а) В член 7 се добавя следният параграф:
(1a) In Article 7 the following paragraph shall be added:
„Комисията приема подробни правила за установяване право на защита.
" The detailed rules for establishing the rights of defence shall be adopted by the Commission.
Тези мерки, предназначени да изменят несъществени елементи на настоящата директива, като я допълват, се приемат в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране с контрол, посочена в член 15, параграф 4.“
Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 15(4). "
The RPS should apply for measures to be adopted on rights of defence.
The RPS should apply for measures to be adopted on rights of defence.
Приложение – раздел 6.7 – точка 1 б (нова)
Annex – section 6.7 – point 1 b (new)
(1б) В член 8, параграф 1 се заменя със следното:
(1b) Article 8(1) shall be replaced by the following:
Комисията по целесъобразност приема мерки за прилагане, с цел да създаде подробни правила във връзка с процедурите, посочени в настоящата глава. “
The Commission [...] shall, where appropriate, adopt implementing measures in order to lay down detailed rules in respect of the procedures referred to in this Chapter. "
Following the introduction of different procedures in Articles 3, 4, 5 and 7, the general reference to the regulatory procedure in Article 8 can be misleading and should thus be deleted.
Following the introduction of different procedures in Articles 3, 4, 5 and 7, the general reference to the regulatory procedure in Article 8 can be misleading and should thus be deleted.
COM(2007)0740 . , the European Commission presented inter alia this proposal, covering 46 legislative acts to be adapted to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS).
COM(2007)0740 . , the European Commission presented inter alia this proposal, covering 46 legislative acts to be adapted to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS).
The Economic and monetary affairs committee (ECON) has looked at the fourth "omnibus proposal"
The Economic and monetary affairs committee (ECON) has looked at the fourth "omnibus proposal"
COM(2008)71 final .
COM(2008)71 final .
We have noted points 3.1 and 3.3 fall into our competencies.
We have noted points 3.1 and 3.3 fall into our competencies.
Point 3.1 Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 of 23 October 1995 concerning harmonised indices of consumer prices
Point 3.1 Council Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 of 23 October 1995 concerning harmonised indices of consumer prices
Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 contains six provisions conferring implementing powers on the Commission, currently all subjects to the regulatory procedure.
Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 contains six provisions conferring implementing powers on the Commission, currently all subjects to the regulatory procedure.
The proposal for alignment makes three of these powers subject the Regulatory procedure with scrutiny and leaves three under the regulatory procedure.
The proposal for alignment makes three of these powers subject the Regulatory procedure with scrutiny and leaves three under the regulatory procedure.
In principle the choice made seems to be the most appropriate one.
In principle the choice made seems to be the most appropriate one.
There is thus from the legal point of view no reason to contest the alignment proposed.
There is thus from the legal point of view no reason to contest the alignment proposed.
However, a different problem has been identified in respect of Article 5(3).
However, a different problem has been identified in respect of Article 5(3).
In fact it is provided that the European Central Bank (ECB) shall be consulted before the Commission adopts implementing measures.
In fact it is provided that the European Central Bank (ECB) shall be consulted before the Commission adopts implementing measures.
Under Article 202 EC a legislative acts cannot impose other conditions than the ones provided for in the Comitology decision on the Commission.
Under Article 202 EC a legislative acts cannot impose other conditions than the ones provided for in the Comitology decision on the Commission.
No consultation of the ECB is foreseen in the Comitology decision.
No consultation of the ECB is foreseen in the Comitology decision.
Therefore, the text should be modified so that it becomes clear that the consultation of ECB is not a condition for the adoption of the implementing measures.
Therefore, the text should be modified so that it becomes clear that the consultation of ECB is not a condition for the adoption of the implementing measures.
However, in its opinion (OJ C117 of 14 May 2008, p.1), the ECB has argued that Article 105(4) is applicable to implementing measures.
However, in its opinion (OJ C117 of 14 May 2008, p.1), the ECB has argued that Article 105(4) is applicable to implementing measures.
That would mean that the Treaty already imposes an obligation to consult the ECB.
That would mean that the Treaty already imposes an obligation to consult the ECB.
If the ECB argument was to be accepted, it would also be legally more coherent if the legislative act did not contain any provision concerning a consultation of the ECB.
If the ECB argument was to be accepted, it would also be legally more coherent if the legislative act did not contain any provision concerning a consultation of the ECB.
Therefore the phrase concerning the consultation of the ECB should be deleted.
Therefore the phrase concerning the consultation of the ECB should be deleted.
We would consequently like to see the part of the proposed Article 5(3) referring to a consultation of the ECB to be deleted and the following phrase should be added to the recital under point 3.1 concerning Regulation (EC) N°2494/95:
We would consequently like to see the part of the proposed Article 5(3) referring to a consultation of the ECB to be deleted and the following phrase should be added to the recital under point 3.1 concerning Regulation (EC) N°2494/95:
"The provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 do not affect Article 105(4) EC which provides that the ECB shall be consulted on any proposed Community act in the fields of its competence."
"The provisions of Regulation (EC) No 2494/95 do not affect Article 105(4) EC which provides that the ECB shall be consulted on any proposed Community act in the fields of its competence."
Point 3.3.
Point 3.3.
Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98 of 19 May 1998 concerning short-term statistics
Council Regulation (EC) No 1165/98 of 19 May 1998 concerning short-term statistics
The proposal to align regulation (EC) No 1165/98 concerns 12 powers specified in Article 17.
The proposal to align regulation (EC) No 1165/98 concerns 12 powers specified in Article 17.
The alignment is correct for all ten that are made subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny and for one of the two that are made subject to the regulatory procedure.
The alignment is correct for all ten that are made subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny and for one of the two that are made subject to the regulatory procedure.
However, Article 17h) would require an amendment.
However, Article 17h) would require an amendment.
It allows the Commission to decide on transition periods and derogations during these periods.
It allows the Commission to decide on transition periods and derogations during these periods.
This power is made subject to the regulatory procedure.
This power is made subject to the regulatory procedure.
However, the adoption of a transition period must be considered as a modification of the elements of the regulation and must therefore be made subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
However, the adoption of a transition period must be considered as a modification of the elements of the regulation and must therefore be made subject to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
It would be possible to separate the power to adopt decisions on derogations from this power and leave that power under the regulatory procedure.
It would be possible to separate the power to adopt decisions on derogations from this power and leave that power under the regulatory procedure.
In respect of the legislative drafting quality and the clarity of the act the proposal contains a series of problems.
In respect of the legislative drafting quality and the clarity of the act the proposal contains a series of problems.
· First of all, Article 17 is formulated as if the powers were examples of powers and that the Commission might also have other powers.
· First of all, Article 17 is formulated as if the powers were examples of powers and that the Commission might also have other powers.
However, no procedure is provided for such further powers.
However, no procedure is provided for such further powers.
Preferably it should be clarified whether there is to be any such general unspecified power.
Preferably it should be clarified whether there is to be any such general unspecified power.
If this is not the case the words " in particular " should be taken out of Article 17.
If this is not the case the words " in particular " should be taken out of Article 17.
· Secondly, powers are conferred not only the central part of the text but also in the annexes.
· Secondly, powers are conferred not only the central part of the text but also in the annexes.
This makes it more difficult to identify all the powers that are conferred on the Commission.
This makes it more difficult to identify all the powers that are conferred on the Commission.
At the very least, Article 17 should contain the information that the power in question is further specified in the annexes (preferably with indication of the exact provisions of the annexes that are concerned).
At the very least, Article 17 should contain the information that the power in question is further specified in the annexes (preferably with indication of the exact provisions of the annexes that are concerned).
· Thirdly, it would appear that one of the powers, the first one under Annex A is only provided for in the annex.
· Thirdly, it would appear that one of the powers, the first one under Annex A is only provided for in the annex.
If this power is not covered by any of the powers under Article 17 it should be added to the list of specific powers in that Article.
If this power is not covered by any of the powers under Article 17 it should be added to the list of specific powers in that Article.
I would be grateful if you could integrate these remarks in your report.
I would be grateful if you could integrate these remarks in your report.
Г-н Giuseppe GARGANI
Mr Giuseppe GARGANI
На 13 март 2008 г. Председателят обяви в пленарно заседание посоченото по-горе предложение на Комисията.
On 13 March 2008 the President announced the above-mentioned Commission proposal in plenary.
Вашата комисия по правни въпроси беше назначена за водеща относно предложението на Комисията в неговата цялост, а нашата комисия по заетост и социални въпроси беше назначена за подпомагаща за следните точки от приложението: точка 3.2, точка 3.4, точка 3.5, точка 3.6.
Your Committee on Legal Affairs has been declared the committee responsible for the entire Commission proposal and our Committee on Employment and Social Affairs has been asked for an opinion on the following paragraphs in the Annex: paragraphs 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6.
Тези точки от приложението към предложението на Комисията се отнасят до адаптирането на следните законодателни актове:
These paragraphs in the Annex to the Commission proposal refer to the adaptation of the following legislative acts:
Приложение 3.2: Регламент (ЕО) № 577/98 на Съвета от 9 март 1998 г. относно организацията на извадково изследване на работната сила в Общността;
Annex 3.2: Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 of 9 March 1998 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community;
Приложение 3.4: Регламент (EО) № 530/1999 на Съвета от 9 март 1999 г. относно структурна статистика за заплатите и разходите за труд;
Annex 3.4: Council Regulation (EC) No 530/1999 of 9 March 1999 concerning structural statistics on earnings and on labour costs;
Приложение 3.5: Регламент (EO) № 450/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 27 февруари 2003 г. относно индекса на разходите за труд;
Annex 3.5: Regulation (EC) No 450/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 concerning the labour cost index;
Приложение 3.6: Регламент (ЕО) № 1552/2005 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 7 септември 2005 г. относно статистиката, свързана с професионалното обучение в предприятията.
Annex 3.6: Regulation (EC) No 1552/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on statistics relating to vocational training in enterprises.
На 1 април 2008 г. комисията по заетост и социални въпроси назначи своя председател Jan Andersson за докладчик по становище.
On 1 April 2008 the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs appointed its chairman, Mr Jan Andersson, as draftsman.
На същото заседание беше решено становището да бъде изготвено под формата на писмо.
At the same meeting it was decided to issue this opinion in the form of a letter.
На 6 май 2008 г. комисията по заетост и социални въпроси разгледа посочените по-горе точки от приложението към предложението на Комисията.
On 6 May 2008 the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs discussed the above-mentioned paragraphs of the Annex to the Commission proposal.
Нашата комисия счита, че:
Our committee takes the view that:
1. предложението на Комисията отговаря на съвместната декларация на Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията (ОВ С 255, 21.10.2006 г.) относно Решение 2006/512/ЕО, и адаптира основните актове към приложимите процедури,
1. the Commission proposal complies with the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (OJ C 255, 21.10.2006) on Decision 2006/512/EC and adapts the basic acts to the procedures applicable,
2. тези изменения засягат единствено процедурите на комитетите,
2. these modifications concern comitology procedures alone,
3. по отношение на член 9 от Регламент 450/2003, подходът на Комисията е приемлив.
3. with regard to Article 9 of Regulation 450/2003, the Commission’s approach is acceptable.
Комисията предлага да се прилага процедурата по регулиране с контрол в съответствие с членове 5 и 7 от Решение 1999/468/ЕО, при спазване на разпоредбите на член 8 от него, по отношение на преходните периоди и дерогациите (член 9).
The Commission proposes the application of the regulatory procedure in accordance with Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC, in compliance with the provisions of Article 8 of that decision, for the treatment of transitional periods and derogations (Article 9).
Комисията по заетост приема този подход, тъй като в този случай мерките са само индивидуални мерки (а не общи) и бяха приложими само до 2 април 2005 г.
The Employment Committee accepts this approach since, in this case, the measures are only individual ones (rather than general ones) and were only applicable until 2 April 2005.
Комисията по заетост и социални въпроси реши
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs decided
На окончателното гласуване присъстваха следните членове: Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Jean Louis Cottigny, Gabriela Creţu, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Petru Filip, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Elizabeth Lynne, Jamila Madeira, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Maria Matsouka, Elisabeth Morin, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacek Protasiewicz, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Csaba Sógor, Jean Spautz, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker да приеме настоящото СТАНОВИЩЕ под формата на писмо и да поиска от комисията по правни въпроси да одобри без изменения предложението на Комисията по съответните точки.
The following full Members were present for the final vote: Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Jean Louis Cottigny, Gabriela Creţu, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Petru Filip, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Elizabeth Lynne, Jamila Madeira, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Maria Matsouka, Elisabeth Morin, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacek Protasiewicz, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Csaba Sógor, Jean Spautz, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker. to adopt this OPINION in the form of a letter and to call on the Committee on Legal Affairs to approve the Commission proposal without amendment with regard to the paragraphs which concern it.
Директива 2001/20/ЕО
Directive 2001/20/EC
(-1) В член 1, параграф 3, първата алинея се заменя със следния текст:
(-1) In Article 1(3), the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Комисията приема и, ако е необходимо, преразглежда принципите на добрата клинична практика и подробни насоки в съответствие с тези принципи [...] за да се отчете техническия и научен прогрес [...] .
The Commission shall adopt and, if necessary, revise the principles of good clinical practice and detailed guidelines in line with those principles [...] to take account of technical and scientific progress [...] .
Регламент (ЕО) No 2037/2000
Regulation (EC) No 2037/2000
Регламент (ЕО) No 315/93
Regulation (EC) No 315/93
При позоваване на настоящия параграф се прилагат член 5а, параграфи 1–4 и параграф 5, буква б), и член 7 от Решение 1999/468/ЕО, при спазване на разпоредбите на член 8 от него.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1) to (4) and 5(b) , and Article 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
”Комисията одобрява плана съгласно регулаторната процедура, определена в член 33 параграф 2 .
"The Commission shall approve the plan in accordance with the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 33(2).
Съгласно същата процедура могат да бъдат приети гаранции, алтернативни на тези, които произтичат от прилагането на настоящата директива.”
Under the same procedure, guarantees alternative to those resulting from the implementation of this Directive may be accepted."
Регламент (ЕО) No 258/97
Regulation (EC) No 258/97
В член 12, параграф 2 се заменя със следния текст :
(7) Article 12(2) is replaced by the following:
Комисията разглежда причините, посочени в параграф 1, възможно най-бързо в рамките на Постоянния комитет по храните; тя предприема необходимите мерки с цел потвърждаване, изменение или отменяне на националната мярка , в съответствие с регулаторната процедура по член 13, параграф 2 .
The Commission shall examine the grounds referred to in paragraph 1 as soon as possible within the Standing Committee for Foodstuffs; it shall take the appropriate measures aimed at confirming, amending or repealing the national measure in accordance with the regulatory procedure laid down in Article 13(2).
Държавата-членка, която е взела решението, посочено в параграф 1, може да го поддържа докато мерките влязат в сила.“
The Member State which took the decision referred to in paragraph 1 may maintain it until the measures have entered into force."
аа) в параграф 6, втора алинея, първото тире се заменя със следния текст:
(aa) in paragraph 6, second subparagraph, the first indent is replaced by the following: