natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Cette approche en deux volets permettra de faire face à l'urgence due à l’imminence des prochaines élections de 2009, mais, en même temps, au travers de la clause de révision insérée à cette fin dans la perspective des élections de 2014, rendra également possible de prendre en compte la mise en œuvre d'ici cette échéance du système de vote à la double majorité au Conseil.
This two-tier approach will make it possible to respond to the urgency due to the next elections in 2009, but at the same time the review clause inserted to this end with a view to the 2014 elections will also make it possible to take into account the implementation by that date of the double majority voting system in the Council.
En fait, une révision plus approfondie de la répartition des sièges au Parlement, bien que souhaitable du point de vue de la légitimité démocratique, ne peut se faire que dans le contexte plus large d'une révision de l'équilibre global entre les institutions de l'Union.
In fact, a more thorough revision of the distribution of seats in the Parliament, although desirable from the point of view of democratic legitimacy, may only be made in a wider context of a review of the overall balance between the Union's institutions.
ANNEXE 1
ANNEX 1
(en millions)
(in millions)
% de la popula-tion de l'UE -27
% of the popula-tion of the EU -27
Sièges jus-qu'en 2009
Seats until 2009
«Nice» rév. - Ratio population/MPE
'Nice' rev. - Ratio population/MEPs
«Nouvelle (3) 2009-2014 propo-sition rapp.
'New' (3) 2009-2014 proposal by rapp.
«Nouveau» - ratio population/MPE
'New' - ratio population/MEPs
832 707
832 707
858 729
858 729
873 417
873 417
849 811
849 811
839 194
839 194
827 699
827 699
816 000
816 000
875 160
875 160
810 333
810 333
763 140
763 140
748 176
748 176
654 848
654 848
653 360
653 360
628 231
628 231
505 682
505 682
480 455
480 455
477 773
477 773
465 955
465 955
458 045
458 045
502 667
502 667
452 400
452 400
486 235
486 235
435 053
435 053
454 059
454 059
428 833
428 833
417 538
417 538
414 538
414 538
404 308
404 308
350 750
350 750
283 583
283 583
286 875
286 875
255 000
255 000
286 142
286 142
250 375
250 375
224 000
224 000
127 667
127 667
76 667
76 667
80 800
80 800
67 333
67 333
669 675
669 675
657 175
657 175
1) Chiffres de population tels que transmis officiellement le 7 novembre 2006 par la Commission au Conseil: voir doc.
1) Population figures as forwarded officially on 7 November 2006 by the Commission to the Council: see doc.
15124/06 reprenant les chiffres tels que collectés par Eurostat.
15124/06 containing the figures as collected by Eurostat.
3) «Nouvelle»: Nouvelle proposition sur la base de l'art.
3) 'New': New proposal pursuant to Art. 9a of the new TEU (I-20).
ANNEXE 2
ANNEX 2
Ratio «Population par MPE» 2009-2014
Ratio 'Population per MEP' 2009-2014
selon la nouvelle proposition
according to the new proposal
selon Nice révisé
according to Nice revised
ANNEXE 3
ANNEX 3
Chiffres de population tels que transmis officiellement le 7 novembre 2006 par la Commission au Conseil: voir doc.
Population figures as forwarded officially on 7 November 2006 by the Commission to the Council: see doc.
Member State / État membre
Member State / État membre
of / de la population
of / de la population
% MPE-% population Proposal / Proposition
% MPE-% population Proposal / Proposition
Дата на приемане
Date of adoption
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski
Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Klaus Hänsch, Alain Lamassoure, Stavros Lambrinidis, Gérard Onesta, Bernard Poignant, György Schöpflin, Kathy Sinnott, Alexander Stubb
Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Klaus Hänsch, Alain Lamassoure, Stavros Lambrinidis, Gérard Onesta, Bernard Poignant, György Schöpflin, Kathy Sinnott, Alexander Stubb
Othmar Karas, Eoin Ryan, Rainer Wieland
Othmar Karas, Eoin Ryan, Rainer Wieland
относно препоръката за решение на Съвета относно присъединяването на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 18 декември 1997 г., приета на основание член К.3 от Договора за Европейския съюз, за взаимна помощ и сътрудничество между митническите администрации
on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 18 December 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the treaty on European Union on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations
PE 393.978v02-00
PE 393.978v02-00
относно препоръката за решение на Съвета относно присъединяването на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 18 декември 1997 г., приета на основание член К.3 от Договора за Европейския съюз, за взаимна помощ и сътрудничество между митническите администрации
on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 18 December 1997 drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the treaty on European Union on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations
– като взе предвид член 3, параграф 4 от Акта за присъединяване на България и Румъния, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него (C6‑0000/2007),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0170/2007 ),
– като припомня усилията на няколко последователни български и румънски правителства за изпълнение на съответните критерии за започване на опростената процедура по присъединяване,
– recalling the efforts of consecutive Bulgarian and Romanian governments to meet the respective benchmarks provided for the activation of the simplified accession procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите ( A6‑0352/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0352/2007 ),
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is intended to make the adjustments required due to the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations, in accordance with Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 2005 Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is intended to make the adjustments required due to the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations, in accordance with Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 of the 2005 Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania
OJ 21.6.2005, L 157, p.203. .
OJ 21.6.2005, L 157, p.203. .
It is indeed not anymore necessary, as in the past, to negotiate and conclude specific accession protocols to these conventions which would have implied ratification by 27 States.
It is indeed not anymore necessary, as in the past, to negotiate and conclude specific accession protocols to these conventions which would have implied ratification by 27 States.
Article 3(3) of the Act provides simply that Bulgaria and Romania accede to these conventions and protocols by virtue of the Act of Accession.
Article 3(3) of the Act provides simply that Bulgaria and Romania accede to these conventions and protocols by virtue of the Act of Accession.
Article 3(3) and 3(4) of the Act of Accession provide that, to that effect, the Council shall adopt a decision in order to determine the date on which these conventions shall enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania and to make all the necessary adjustments to these conventions required by reason of the accession of the two new Member States.
Article 3(3) and 3(4) of the Act of Accession provide that, to that effect, the Council shall adopt a decision in order to determine the date on which these conventions shall enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania and to make all the necessary adjustments to these conventions required by reason of the accession of the two new Member States.
This would include, in any event, the adoption of the conventions in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages, so that these versions can be "equally authentic".
This would include, in any event, the adoption of the conventions in the Bulgarian and Romanian languages, so that these versions can be "equally authentic".
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the conventions and protocols concerned.
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the conventions and protocols concerned.
The list includes the Convention of 18 December 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations.
The list includes the Convention of 18 December 1997, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations.
Присъединяване на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 18 декември 1997 г. за взаимна помощ и сътрудничество между митническите администрации
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 18 December 1997 on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations
Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Nicola Zingaretti
Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Nicola Zingaretti
Wolfgang Bulfon, Giovanna Corda, Joel Hasse Ferreira
Wolfgang Bulfon, Giovanna Corda, Joel Hasse Ferreira
общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемането на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за установяване на обща рамка за търговските регистри за статистически цели и за отмяна на Регламент (ЕИО) № 2186/93 на Съвета
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2186/93
PE 393.944v02-00
PE 393.944v02-00
относно общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемането на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за определяне на обща рамка за търговските регистри за статистически цели и за отмяна на Регламент (ЕИО) № 2186/93 на Съвета
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common framework for business registers for statistical purposes and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2186/93
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (7656/5/2007 – C6‑0218/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (7656/5/2007 – C6‑0218/2007 ),
Приети текстове, 1.6.2006 г., P6_TA(2006)0229 . относно предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2005)0112 ),
Texts adopted , 1.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0229 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0112 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по икономически и парични въпроси ( A6‑0353/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0353/2007 ),
За да се гарантира използването изключително за статистически цели на предадените по настоящия член данни, целта, обхватът, форматът, сигурността и мерките за поверителност, както и процедурата за предаване на данни относно индивидуални единици пред Комисията (Евростат) и за предаване на данни относно мултинационалните групи от предприятия на съответните национални органи се приемат в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране, посочена в член 16, параграф 2.
In order to ensure that the data transmitted under this Article is used exclusively for statistical purposes, the purpose, scope, format, security and confidentiality measures, and procedure for the transmission of data on individual units to the Commission (Eurostat) and for the transmission of data on the multinational enterprise groups to the appropriate national authorities shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
За да се гарантира използването изключително за статистически цели на предадените по настоящия член данни, (заличаване) форматът, сигурността и мерките за поверителност, както и процедурата за предаване на данни относно индивидуални единици пред Комисията (Евростат) и за предаване на данни относно мултинационалните групи от предприятия на съответните национални органи се приемат в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране, посочена в член 16, параграф 2.
In order to ensure that the data transmitted under this Article is used exclusively for statistical purposes, the format, security and confidentiality measures, and procedure for the transmission of data on individual units to the Commission (Eurostat) and for the transmission of data on the multinational enterprise groups to the appropriate national authorities shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
The inclusion of the two words would allow the Commission to determine the "purpose" and "scope" of the transmission of data provided for in these articles and in the annex.
The inclusion of the two words would allow the Commission to determine the "purpose" and "scope" of the transmission of data provided for in these articles and in the annex.
It would thus permit the Commission to modify the obligations of the Member states, the authorities and central banks concerned as well as the Commission under Articles 11 and 12 and the annex.
It would thus permit the Commission to modify the obligations of the Member states, the authorities and central banks concerned as well as the Commission under Articles 11 and 12 and the annex.
These obligations are elements of the basic act.
These obligations are elements of the basic act.
Modifying them in one direction or another would affect political choices made in the basic act.
Modifying them in one direction or another would affect political choices made in the basic act.
За да се гарантира използването изключително за статистически цели на данните, предавани съгласно този член, целта, обхватът, форматът, сигурността и мерките за поверителност, както и процедурата за предаване на данни относно мултинационалните групи от предприятия на националните централни банки и на Европейската централна банка се приемат в съответствие с процедурата, посочена в член 16, параграф 2.
In order to ensure that the data transmitted under this Article is used exclusively for statistical purposes, the purpose, scope, format, security and confidentiality measures, and procedure for the transmission of data on the multinational enterprise groups to the national central banks and the European Central Bank shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
За да се гарантира използването изключително за статистически цели на данните, предавани съгласно този член, (заличаване) форматът, сигурността и мерките за поверителност, както и процедурата за предаване на данни относно мултинационалните групи от предприятия на националните централни банки и на Европейската централна банка се приемат в съответствие с процедурата, посочена в член 16, параграф 2.
In order to ensure that the data transmitted under this Article is used exclusively for statistical purposes, the format, security and confidentiality measures, and procedure for the transmission of data on the multinational enterprise groups to the national central banks and the European Central Bank shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 16(2).
„Red tape“ is a common expression in the English language, but not a household word in other languages.
„Red tape“ is a common expression in the English language, but not a household word in other languages.
Because this term would, in the eyes of the rapporteur and the majority of the peoples of the Member States of the European Union, apply to a very broad spectrum of legislative actions the EU institutions have undertaken for a long time.
Because this term would, in the eyes of the rapporteur and the majority of the peoples of the Member States of the European Union, apply to a very broad spectrum of legislative actions the EU institutions have undertaken for a long time.
The overregulation and ever new bureaucratic initiatives serve primarily the well fed body of Brussels based bureaucrats whose pension averages 5509 Euros.
The overregulation and ever new bureaucratic initiatives serve primarily the well fed body of Brussels based bureaucrats whose pension averages 5509 Euros.
These enormous privileges lead to a momentum that innumerable individuals involved have a strong tendency to create more and more regulations in order to justify their work place instead of contributing significantly to the reduction of the bureaucratic burden.
These enormous privileges lead to a momentum that innumerable individuals involved have a strong tendency to create more and more regulations in order to justify their work place instead of contributing significantly to the reduction of the bureaucratic burden.
This fundamental problem has to be addressed when dealing with the issue involving this report.
This fundamental problem has to be addressed when dealing with the issue involving this report.
The Regulation on business registers (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2186/93), which compiles statistics on businesses operating in the European Union, namely data on their number, type, size structure and other characteristics, was said to aim providing reliable statistical data for EU policy makers.
The Regulation on business registers (Council Regulation (EEC) No 2186/93), which compiles statistics on businesses operating in the European Union, namely data on their number, type, size structure and other characteristics, was said to aim providing reliable statistical data for EU policy makers.
The objective of the Commission proposal of 5 April 2005 was to update the regulation in order to take into account new requirements stemming from the ongoing globalisation process and the further integration of the Internal Market.
The objective of the Commission proposal of 5 April 2005 was to update the regulation in order to take into account new requirements stemming from the ongoing globalisation process and the further integration of the Internal Market.
On 1 June 2006 the European Parliament supported the core of the Commission proposal in its first reading, subject to 22 amendments focusing on the issue of the administrative burden, a clarification of the terms and conditions under which confidential data can be transmitted and, finally, a series of amendments of a technical and editorial nature.
On 1 June 2006 the European Parliament supported the core of the Commission proposal in its first reading, subject to 22 amendments focusing on the issue of the administrative burden, a clarification of the terms and conditions under which confidential data can be transmitted and, finally, a series of amendments of a technical and editorial nature.
The Council endorsed all 22 amendments of Parliament in its Common Position of 21 May 2007.
The Council endorsed all 22 amendments of Parliament in its Common Position of 21 May 2007.
But now there is a remaining issue.
But now there is a remaining issue.
Because only a few weeks after the first reading of Parliament, on 17 July 2006, the Council Decision 2006/512/EC amended the Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999, laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission and introducing a new procedure named "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" (Article 5a).
Because only a few weeks after the first reading of Parliament, on 17 July 2006, the Council Decision 2006/512/EC amended the Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999, laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission and introducing a new procedure named "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" (Article 5a).
This new "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" has now to be used to adopt measures of general scope which seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements.
This new "regulatory procedure with scrutiny" has now to be used to adopt measures of general scope which seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing the instrument by the addition of new non-essential elements.
As a consequence, a second reading of Parliament has become unavoidable, creating new red tape.
As a consequence, a second reading of Parliament has become unavoidable, creating new red tape.
Because in order to incorporate the new comitology provisions into the draft regulation, the Council had to attribute the specific powers conferred to the Commission to the two types of regulatory procedures: the one with scrutiny and the one without scrutiny.
Because in order to incorporate the new comitology provisions into the draft regulation, the Council had to attribute the specific powers conferred to the Commission to the two types of regulatory procedures: the one with scrutiny and the one without scrutiny.
In line with the assessment of Parliament and the Commission respectively, the Council conferred measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the regulation to the Commission, thereby using the procedure with scrutiny, as laid down in Article 5a of Council Decision 1999/468/EC.
In line with the assessment of Parliament and the Commission respectively, the Council conferred measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the regulation to the Commission, thereby using the procedure with scrutiny, as laid down in Article 5a of Council Decision 1999/468/EC.
In the case of the Regulation on business registers, the new procedure consequently applies:
In the case of the Regulation on business registers, the new procedure consequently applies:
• to the update the list of registers characteristics in the Annex, their definitions and their continuity rules,
• to the update the list of registers characteristics in the Annex, their definitions and their continuity rules,
• to the decision on the coverage of the smallest enterprises and all resident enterprise groups,
• to the decision on the coverage of the smallest enterprises and all resident enterprise groups,
• to the establishment of common quality standards,
• to the establishment of common quality standards,
• to the content and periodicity of the quality reports, and, finally,
• to the content and periodicity of the quality reports, and, finally,
• to the adoption of the rules for updating registers.
• to the adoption of the rules for updating registers.
These points are all uncontroversial.
These points are all uncontroversial.
However, in respect of the powers concerning the transmission of data, a legal problem has appeared.
However, in respect of the powers concerning the transmission of data, a legal problem has appeared.
These powers would be covered by the regulatory procedure without scrutiny according to Council.
These powers would be covered by the regulatory procedure without scrutiny according to Council.