natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The question should not be ‘if’, but ‘how’ to proceed, following an even-handed approach without cumbersome bureaucracy, in order to manage the change from action under the conventions to Community action.
The question should not be ‘if’, but ‘how’ to proceed, following an even-handed approach without cumbersome bureaucracy, in order to manage the change from action under the conventions to Community action.
Excessive red tape
Excessive red tape
It needs to be made clear that (a) it is not the Member States which must prove that the standards are being applied, but the Commission which must prove that provisions are being violated (trust); and (b) Member States can fulfil Community obligations by employing the existing conventions to enforce international rules (auditing).
It needs to be made clear that (a) it is not the Member States which must prove that the standards are being applied, but the Commission which must prove that provisions are being violated (trust); and (b) Member States can fulfil Community obligations by employing the existing conventions to enforce international rules (auditing).
Under the proposal for a directive IMO surveys and EC surveys are treated as equivalent procedures, thus apparently simplifying ‘Communitarisation’ of the conventions.
Under the proposal for a directive IMO surveys and EC surveys are treated as equivalent procedures, thus apparently simplifying ‘Communitarisation’ of the conventions.
On the other hand, the provisions for ‘communication of information’ and ‘performance evaluation’ seem likely to add to the bureaucratic burdens imposed on national administrations: monitoring procedures and documents need to be unified and simplified as far as possible.
On the other hand, the provisions for ‘communication of information’ and ‘performance evaluation’ seem likely to add to the bureaucratic burdens imposed on national administrations: monitoring procedures and documents need to be unified and simplified as far as possible.
Need for flexibility
Need for flexibility
As regards the effects of ‘harmonisation’ of the ‘comitology’ arrangements, the measure of administrative discretion already afforded by the IMO provisions is necessary in order to enable flag State requirements to be enforced in line with national situations, which differ in terms of the ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ of fleets: the ‘Community interpretation would be employed to more useful effect if it were subject to a request from the parties concerned (administrations and/or operators) and given on a case-by-case basis (instead of being valid across the board).
As regards the effects of ‘harmonisation’ of the ‘comitology’ arrangements, the measure of administrative discretion already afforded by the IMO provisions is necessary in order to enable flag State requirements to be enforced in line with national situations, which differ in terms of the ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’ of fleets: the ‘Community interpretation would be employed to more useful effect if it were subject to a request from the parties concerned (administrations and/or operators) and given on a case-by-case basis (instead of being valid across the board).
It should, however, be pointed out that the committee responsible (COSS) is staffed entirely by representatives of the Member States and merely chaired by the Commission.
It should, however, be pointed out that the committee responsible (COSS) is staffed entirely by representatives of the Member States and merely chaired by the Commission.
Estimated costs
Estimated costs
According to the Commission’s impact assessment, more intensive oversight by flag States will promote economies of scale as far as port State procedures are concerned: this will work wholly to the advantage of ships in a Community register, which will undergo more ‘upstream’ checks (at the time of registration) but fewer ‘downstream’ inspections (when they berth).
According to the Commission’s impact assessment, more intensive oversight by flag States will promote economies of scale as far as port State procedures are concerned: this will work wholly to the advantage of ships in a Community register, which will undergo more ‘upstream’ checks (at the time of registration) but fewer ‘downstream’ inspections (when they berth).
Similarly, the upgrading of the administrations, which will have to meet ISO standards, and, moreover, are already required to do so under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), will increase expenditure temporarily, but enhance efficiency in the future.
Similarly, the upgrading of the administrations, which will have to meet ISO standards, and, moreover, are already required to do so under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), will increase expenditure temporarily, but enhance efficiency in the future.
Неизказано становище
Not delivering opinions
Дата на решението
Date of decision
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
по предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Директива 89/391/ЕИО на Съвета, на нейните особени директиви и на Директиви 83/477/ЕИО, 91/383/ЕИО, 92/29/ЕИО и 94/33/ЕО, с цел опростяване и рационализиране на докладите относно практическото прилагане
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/391/EEC, its individual Directives and Council Directives 83/447/EEC, 91/383/EEC, 92/29/EEC and 94/33/EC with a view to simplifying and rationalising the reports on practical implementation
PE 382.212v02-00
PE 382.212v02-00
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛНА ПРОЕКТОРЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ.........4
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ …………………………………………………………...11
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
за предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно за изменение на Директива 89/391/ЕИО на Съвета, на нейните особени директиви и на Директиви 83/477/ЕИО, 91/383/ЕИО, 92/29/ЕИО и 94/33/ЕО, с цел опростяване и рационализиране на докладите относно практическото прилагане
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/391/EEC, its individual Directives and Council Directives 83/447/EEC, 91/383/EEC, 92/29/EEC and 94/33/EC with a view to simplifying and rationalising the reports on practical implementation
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2006)0390 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0390 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 137, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0242/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 137(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0242/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по заетост и социални въпроси ( A6‑0059/2006 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0059/2006 ),
ПОЗОВАВАНЕ 2
CITATION 2
като взеха предвид предложението на Комисията, представено след консултация с Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и здравеопазване на работното място,
Having regard to the Commission's proposal, presented after consultation of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,
като взеха предвид предложението на Комисията,
Having regard to the Commission's proposal,
This is a compromise amendment with the Council in order to reach an agreement in first reading.
This is a compromise amendment with the Council in order to reach an agreement in first reading.
ПОЗОВАВАНЕ 3
CITATION 3
като взеха предвид становището на Европейския икономически и социален комитет, след консултация с Комитета на регионите,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee, after consultation of the Committee of the Regions,
(8) Изготвянето на въпросните доклади и представянето им пред Комисията би трябвало да се осъществяват на всеки пет години; структурата на въпросните доклади трябва да бъде последователна, за да се улесни тяхното използване; те трябва да се изготвят въз основа на въпросник, съставен от Комисията след консултация с Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и здравеопазването на работното място.
(8) The appropriate frequency for the Member States to draw up these reports and submit them to the Commission would be five years; the structure of the reports must be consistent to facilitate their exploitation; they must be drawn up on the basis of a questionnaire drafted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
(8) Изготвянето на въпросните доклади и представянето им пред Комисията би трябвало да се осъществяват на всеки пет години; по изключение първият доклад би следвало да обхваща по-дълъг период; структурата на въпросните доклади трябва да бъде последователна, за да се улесни тяхното използване; те трябва да се изготвят въз основа на въпросник, съставен от Комисията след консултация с Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и здравеопазването на работното място, и да включват съответна информация относно превантивните усилия, които се полагат в държавите-членки, за да се позволи на Комисията, като вземе предвид всички съответни заключения на Европейската агенция за здравословни и безопасни условия на труд и на Европейската фондация за подобряване условията на живот и труд, да оцени в достатъчна степен как работи законодателството на практика.
(8) The appropriate frequency for the Member States to draw up these reports and submit them to the Commission would be five years; the first report should exceptionally cover a longer period; the structure of the reports must be consistent to facilitate their exploitation; they must be drawn up on the basis of a questionnaire drafted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work , and include relevant information on the preventive efforts deployed in the Member States so as to allow the Commission, taking into account any relevant findings of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work and of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, adequately to assess how the legislation works in practice .
(12) Необходимите мерки, които следва да бъдат предприети от държавите-членки, не включват приемане на законови, подзаконови или административни актове, тъй като изготвянето на доклади относно практическото прилагане на общностни директиви в момента не изисква приемане на такива актове на равнището на държавите-членки.
(12) The necessary measures to be taken by the Member States do not involve the adoption of legislative, regulatory or administrative acts, since the drafting of reports on the implementation of Community directives does not currently require the adoption of such provisions at Member State level .
(12) Държавите-членки би следвало да вземат необходимите мерки за транспониране на предвидените в настоящата директива промени, които, с оглед на специфичния характер на настоящата директива и по целесъобразност, биха могли да са под формата на административни мерки.
(12) The Member States should take the necessary measures to transpose the modifications provided for by this Directive, which could, in view of the specific nature of this Directive and if appropriate, take the form of administrative measures .
На всеки пет години държавите-членки представят на Комисията общ доклад относно практическото прилагане на настоящата директива и на специалните директиви по смисъла на член 16, параграф 1 от нея, като посочват мненията на социалните партньори.
Every five years, the Member States shall submit a single report to the Commission on the practical implementation of this Directive and individual Directives within the meaning of Article 16(1) thereof, indicating the points of view of the social partners.
Докладът оценява различните точки, свързани с практическото прилагане на отделните директиви и по целесъобразност и възможност, предоставя данни с разбивка по пол.
The report shall assess the various points related to practical implementation of the different Directives and, where appropriate and available, provide data disaggregated by gender.
Структурата на доклада се определя от Комисията, в сътрудничество с Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и опазване на здравето на работното място.
The structure of the report shall be defined by the Commission, in cooperation with the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
Структурата на доклада, придружена от въпросник с подробности за съдържанието му , се определя от Комисията, в сътрудничество с Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и опазване на здравето на работното място.
The structure of the report , together with a questionnaire specifying its content, shall be defined by the Commission, in cooperation with the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work.
Докладът включва обща част относно разпоредбите на настоящата директива във връзка с общите принципи и точки, приложими към всички директиви по параграф 1.
The report shall include a general part on the provisions of this Directive relating to the common principles and points applicable to all of the Directives referred to in paragraph 1.
В допълнение към общата част, отделните глави се отнасят до прилагането на специалните аспекти на всяка директива, в т.ч., специфични показатели, по възможност.
To complement the general part, specific chapters shall deal with implementation of the particular aspects of each Directive, including specific indicators, where available.
Шест месеца преди края на обхванатия в доклада период Комисията изпраща на държавите-членки структурата на доклада, придружена от въпросник с подробности за съдържанието му .
The Commission shall send the structure of the report, together with a questionnaire specifying its content , to the Member States six months before the end of the period covered by the report.
Докладът се предава на Комисията в срок от девет месеца след края на петгодишния период, за който се отнася.
The report shall be transmitted to the Commission within nine months of the end of the five-year period that it covers.
Най-малко шест месеца преди края на обхванатия в доклада период Комисията представя на държавите-членки структурата на доклада, придружена от горепосочения въпросник.
The Commission shall submit the structure of the report, together with the above-mentioned questionnaire, to the Member States at least six months before the end of the period covered by the report.
Докладът се предава на Комисията в срок от дванадесет месеца след края на петгодишния период, за който се отнася.
The report shall be transmitted to the Commission within twelve months of the end of the five-year period that it covers.
Въз основа на въпросните доклади Комисията прави оценка на прилагането на посочените директиви и на напредъка с оглед на проведените изследвания и на новите научни познания в различните области.
Using these reports as a basis, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of the Directives concerned and developments in terms of research and new scientific knowledge in the various fields in question.
Комисията периодично уведомява Европейския парламент, Съвета, Европейския икономически и социален комитет и Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и опазване на здравето на работното място за тази оценка и при необходимост, за всички инициативи за подобряване на функционирането на правната уредба.
It shall periodically inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of this evaluation and, if necessary, of any initiatives to improve the operation of the regulatory framework.
Въз основа на въпросните доклади Комисията прави оценка на прилагането на посочените директиви с оглед на тяхната целесъобразност, проведените изследвания и на новите научни познания в различните области.
Using these reports as a basis, the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of the Directives concerned in terms of their relevance, research and new scientific knowledge in the various fields in question.
В срок от 36 месеца след края на петгодишния период Комисията уведомява Европейския парламент, Съвета, Европейския икономически и социален комитет и Консултативния комитет по безопасност, хигиена и опазване на здравето на работното място за резултатите от тази оценка и при необходимост, за всички инициативи за подобряване на функционирането на правната уредба.
It shall , within 36 months of the end of the five-year period, inform the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work of the results of this evaluation and, if necessary, of any initiatives to improve the operation of the regulatory framework.
This is a compromise amendment with the Council in order to reach an agreement in first reading .
This is a compromise amendment with the Council in order to reach an agreement in first reading.
ЧЛЕН 3, УВОДНА ЧАСТ
ARTICLE 3, INTRODUCTORY PART
В сила от [датата по член 4, която подлежи на уточнение] се отменят следните разпоредби:
With effect from [date to be specified, indicated in Article 4] the following provisions shall be repealed:
* Дата на влизане в сила на настоящата директива
* Date of en try into force of this Directive.
Държавите-членки приемат мерките, необходими им за изпълнение на разпоредбите на настоящата директива, до […].
The Member States shall adopt the measures necessary for them to comply with the provisions of this Directive by […] .
Когато държавите-членки приемат въпросните мерки, те трябва да съдържат позоваване на настоящата директива или да бъдат придружени от такова позоваване при официалното им публикуване.
The Member States shall adopt the measures necessary for them to comply with the provisions of this Directive by 31 December 2012 .
Условията на позоваването се определят от държавите-членки.
When the Member States adopt those measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication.
Държавите-членки приемат мерките, необходими им за изпълнение на разпоредбите на настоящата директива, до 31 декември 2012 г.
Member States shall determine how such reference is to be made.
Настоящата директива влиза в сила на […] ден след публикуването й в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз .
This Directive shall enter into force on the […] day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Настоящата директива влиза в сила в деня след публикуването й в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз .
This Directive shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
In the European Communities, worker health and working conditions were matters to which the Commission and Council did not begin to address themselves until very late in the day.
In the European Communities, worker health and working conditions were matters to which the Commission and Council did not begin to address themselves until very late in the day.
In the 1970s and the early 1980s the Seveso Directive and the setting-up of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work were the first instances in which concerns about working conditions were raised, following on, in a way, from the specific workers’ health programmes established under the then European Coal and Steel Community.
In the 1970s and the early 1980s the Seveso Directive and the setting-up of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work were the first instances in which concerns about working conditions were raised, following on, in a way, from the specific workers’ health programmes established under the then European Coal and Steel Community.
Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work is the model for this first level of partial concerns, that is to say, defined according to given risk factors, which have been the subject of directives.
Directive 83/477/EEC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work is the model for this first level of partial concerns, that is to say, defined according to given risk factors, which have been the subject of directives.
Other matters such as the health of workers in general and working conditions, the organisation of health, hygiene, and safety services at the workplace, and the list of occupational diseases failed to secure the unanimous approval of the Member States.
Other matters such as the health of workers in general and working conditions, the organisation of health, hygiene, and safety services at the workplace, and the list of occupational diseases failed to secure the unanimous approval of the Member States.
At that time the term ‘social dumping’ was coined to denote unfair competition by companies and countries that were not investing in the safety and health of their labour force.
At that time the term ‘social dumping’ was coined to denote unfair competition by companies and countries that were not investing in the safety and health of their labour force.
In 1989 the issue of the framework directive (Directive 89/391/EEC) marked a significant step forward matching earlier initiatives by the World Health Organisation under its worker health programmes and, in particular, serving to respond to the International Labour Organisation’s 1981 and 1985 conventions and recommendations relating, respectively, to the health of workers and the organisation of occupational health services.
In 1989 the issue of the framework directive (Directive 89/391/EEC) marked a significant step forward matching earlier initiatives by the World Health Organisation under its worker health programmes and, in particular, serving to respond to the International Labour Organisation’s 1981 and 1985 conventions and recommendations relating, respectively, to the health of workers and the organisation of occupational health services.
This framework directive has been followed by at least 16 directives aimed at upward harmonisation of working conditions in the enlarged Communities.
This framework directive has been followed by at least 16 directives aimed at upward harmonisation of working conditions in the enlarged Communities.
Continuing into the 1990s, other directives were published to protect young workers, temporary workers, and those manning ships.
Continuing into the 1990s, other directives were published to protect young workers, temporary workers, and those manning ships.