natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси ( A6‑0243/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0243/2008 ),
Brussels, April 7, 2008
Brussels, April 7, 2008
Proposal for a Council directive concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade
Proposal for a Council directive concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade
COM(2008)0099 of 22.2.2008 - 2008/0037(CNS)
COM(2008)0099 of 22.2.2008 - 2008/0037(CNS)
Ветеринарни проверки по отношение на търговията вътре в Общността (Кодифицирана версия)
Veterinary checks in intra-Community trade (codified version)
относно предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Директива 2006/66/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно батерии и акумулатори и отпадъци от батерии и акумулатори и по-специално на член 6, параграф 2 за пускането на пазара на батерии и акумулатори
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators as regards Article 6(2) on placing batteries and accumulators on the market
PE 407.594v02-00
PE 407.594v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2008)0211 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0211 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 95, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0165/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0165/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните ( A6‑0244/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0244/2008 ),
The objective of this proposal is to clarify Article 6(2) of Directive 2006/66/EC (Batteries Directive).
The objective of this proposal is to clarify Article 6(2) of Directive 2006/66/EC (Batteries Directive).
According to the Batteries Directive, Member States have to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 26 September 2008.
According to the Batteries Directive, Member States have to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 26 September 2008.
Article 6(2) sets out that batteries and accumulators that do not meet the requirements of Directive 2006/66/EC should not be placed on the market or should be withdrawn from it.
Article 6(2) sets out that batteries and accumulators that do not meet the requirements of Directive 2006/66/EC should not be placed on the market or should be withdrawn from it.
This provision could be understood to require that batteries lawfully placed on the market before 26 September 2008, still on the market after this date, and not meeting the requirements of the Batteries Directive, also need to be withdrawn from the market.
This provision could be understood to require that batteries lawfully placed on the market before 26 September 2008, still on the market after this date, and not meeting the requirements of the Batteries Directive, also need to be withdrawn from the market.
According to the Explanatory memorandum of the current proposal, the Commission's intention was not to withdraw the batteries from the market after 26 September 2008 that were legally placed on the market before this date.
According to the Explanatory memorandum of the current proposal, the Commission's intention was not to withdraw the batteries from the market after 26 September 2008 that were legally placed on the market before this date.
Therefore, the Commission proposes to clarify this provision and thus provide legal certainty on this matter in order to avoid the situations of diverging legal regimes between Member States amounting to problems of mutual recognition and of internal market disruption.
Therefore, the Commission proposes to clarify this provision and thus provide legal certainty on this matter in order to avoid the situations of diverging legal regimes between Member States amounting to problems of mutual recognition and of internal market disruption.
Considering that this clarification should intervene before 26 September 2008, this has been proposed as a ‘fast track action’ to reduce the administrative burden.
Considering that this clarification should intervene before 26 September 2008, this has been proposed as a ‘fast track action’ to reduce the administrative burden.
Rapporteur's view
Rapporteur's view
The issue of how to interpret Article 6 has come up at a very late stage and it should be underlined that during the whole negotiation of the Batteries Directive there was never any discussion about which batteries would have to be withdrawn once the provisions of the Directive start to apply.
The issue of how to interpret Article 6 has come up at a very late stage and it should be underlined that during the whole negotiation of the Batteries Directive there was never any discussion about which batteries would have to be withdrawn once the provisions of the Directive start to apply.
It has been made clear that the background of this revision is a bid of industry that wants certainty about the implementation of article 6(2).
It has been made clear that the background of this revision is a bid of industry that wants certainty about the implementation of article 6(2).
Having said this, the rapporteur of course agrees with the conclusion that an interpretation as the one given above would mean that a considerable amount of batteries and appliances that have been legally placed on the market would become waste prematurely and that this would be contrary to the principle of waste minimisation.
Having said this, the rapporteur of course agrees with the conclusion that an interpretation as the one given above would mean that a considerable amount of batteries and appliances that have been legally placed on the market would become waste prematurely and that this would be contrary to the principle of waste minimisation.
For example, the effect of Article 6(2) remaining unchanged would either involve the labelling of batteries that are still on the market and not labelled with the wheeled bin and chemical symbols or withdrawing them from the market, it would involve the withdrawal from the market of specific portable batteries that contain more than the cadmium allowed by Article 4 of Directive 2006/66/EC, and it would involve the withdrawal of appliances that do not comply with the requirement of making batteries removable as set out by Article 11 of the Batteries Directive.
For example, the effect of Article 6(2) remaining unchanged would either involve the labelling of batteries that are still on the market and not labelled with the wheeled bin and chemical symbols or withdrawing them from the market, it would involve the withdrawal from the market of specific portable batteries that contain more than the cadmium allowed by Article 4 of Directive 2006/66/EC, and it would involve the withdrawal of appliances that do not comply with the requirement of making batteries removable as set out by Article 11 of the Batteries Directive.
In this respect (the interpretation of) the scope of the definition of placing on the market is important.
In this respect (the interpretation of) the scope of the definition of placing on the market is important.
Article 3(14) now reads:
Article 3(14) now reads:
‘placing on the market’ means supplying or making available, whether in return for payment or free of charge, to a third party within the Community and includes import into the customs territory of the Community;
‘placing on the market’ means supplying or making available, whether in return for payment or free of charge, to a third party within the Community and includes import into the customs territory of the Community;
Your rapporteur does see the need for the changed wording in principle, but would like to get some assurance that agreeing to the new wording proposed by the Commission would not lead to a very long transition period because of very big stocks of the "non-complying" batteries or misuse of the Article.
Your rapporteur does see the need for the changed wording in principle, but would like to get some assurance that agreeing to the new wording proposed by the Commission would not lead to a very long transition period because of very big stocks of the "non-complying" batteries or misuse of the Article.
Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Владко Тодоров Панайотов, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
(Опростена процедура – член 43, параграф 1 от правилника)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(2) of the Rules of Procedure)
PE 406.067v02-00
PE 406.067v02-00
относно предложението за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 460/2004 относно създаване на Европейската агенция за мрежова и информационна сигурност, по отношение на срока й на съществуване
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 460/2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency as regards its duration
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2007)0861 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0861 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 95 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0003/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0003/2008 ),
– като взе предвид член 51 и член 43, параграф 2 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика ( A6‑0245/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0245/2008 ),
(1) През 2004 г. Европейският парламент и Съветът приеха Регламент (ЕО) № 460/2004 относно създаване на Европейската агенция за мрежова и информационна сигурност (наричана по-долу „Агенцията”).
(1) In 2004 the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) N° 460/2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (hereinafter referred to as “the Agency”).
(1) На 10 март 2004 г. Европейският парламент и Съветът приеха Регламент (ЕО) № 460/2004 относно създаване на Европейската агенция за мрежова и информационна сигурност (наричана по-долу „Агенцията“) за срок от пет години.
(1) On 10 March 2004 the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) N° 460/2004 establishing the European Network and Information Security Agency (hereinafter referred to as “the Agency”) for five years .
(2) През март 2007 г. Управителният съвет на Агенцията направи препоръки относно необходими промени на регламента.
(2) In March 2007 the Management Board of the Agency issued recommendations regarding appropriate changes to the Regulation.
Една от препоръките е изменение на регламента с цел удължаване мандата на Агенцията, но без съществена промяна в обхвата й на дейност.
One of these was that the Regulation should be amended to extend the mandate of the Agency but that the scope of the Agency should not be materially changed.
(2) След направената Oценка на ENISA, на 23 март 2007 г. Управителният съвет на Агенцията даде препоръки относно необходими промени на регламента.
(2) On 23 March 2007 the Management Board of the Agency issued recommendations , following the Evaluation of ENISA, regarding appropriate changes to the Regulation.
(4) На 13 ноември Комисията предложи създаването на Европейския орган за пазара на електронни съобщения.
(4) On 13 November the Commission proposed establishment of a European Electronic Communications Market Authority.
Комисията предложи след 14 март 2011 г. този орган да поеме от ENISA отговорността за дейностите, предвидени в обхвата на регламента за създаване на Органа.
The Commission proposed that this authority take over responsibility for all the activities undertaken by ENISA from 14 March 2011 on that fall within the scope of the Regulation establishing the Authority.
(5) Поради факта, че срокът на съществуване на Агенцията изтича на 13 март 2009 г. и за да осигури приемственост, е необходимо да се приемат временни мерки за двете години между изтичането на предвидения срок на съществуване на Агенцията и датата, на която Европейският орган за пазара на електронни съобщения ще поеме отговорността за дейностите, предвидени в обхвата на регламента за създаване на Органа.
(5) Since the mandate of the Agency will expire on 13 March 2009, in order to ensure continuity it is necessary to adopt an interim measure for the two years between the scheduled expiry of the Agency and the date proposed for the European Electronic Communications Market Authority to take over responsibility for the activities of the Agency that fall within the scope of the Regulation establishing the Authority .
(5) Поради факта, че срокът на съществуване на Агенцията изтича на 13 март 2009 г. и за да се осигури последователност и приемственост, е необходимо да се приеме удължаване на срока поради тези причини, което ще даде възможност за допълнително обсъждане на ENISA.
(5) Since the mandate of the Agency will expire on 13 March 2009 in order to ensure consistency and continuity it is therefore necessary to adopt an extension which will enable further discussion on the ENISA.
Обсъждането ще отрази резултатите от процеса на оценка на ENISA, препоръките на Управителния съвет и текущия преглед на регулаторната рамка за електронните съобщителни мрежи и услуги.
The discussion will reflect the results of the ENISA evaluation process, the Management Board recommendations and the ongoing review of the regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services.
Това ще даде възможност и за по-задълбочен размисъл върху общата насока на европейските усилия за по-голяма мрежова и информационна сигурност.
It will also allow further reflection on the general direction of the European efforts towards an increased network and information security.
Удължаването на срока на съществуване на Агенцията не се засяга от резултатите от обсъждането.
The extension of the duration of the Agency is without prejudice to the outcome of this discussion.
(6) Срокът на съществуване на Агенцията се продължава до 13 март 2011 г. ,
(6) The duration of the Agency should therefore be extended until 13 March 2011 ,
(6) Ето защо срокът на съществуване на Агенцията следва да се удължи до 13 март 2012 г.,
(6) The duration of the Agency should therefore be extended until 13 March 2012 ,
Агенцията се създава от 14 март 2004 г. за срок от седем години .
The Agency shall be established from 14 March 2004 for a period of seven years .
Агенцията се създава от 14 март 2004 г. за срок от осем години .
The Agency shall be established from 14 March 2004 for a period of eight years .
Eвропейска агенция за мрежова и информационна сигурност
European Network and Information Security Agency
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Norbert Glante, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Mary Honeyball, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Atanas Paparizov, Aldo Patriciello, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Nikolaos Vakalis, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Norbert Glante, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Mary Honeyball, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Atanas Paparizov, Aldo Patriciello, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Britta Thomsen, Patrizia Toia, Nikolaos Vakalis, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Christian Ehler, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gunnar Hökmark, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Esko Seppänen, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Christian Ehler, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gunnar Hökmark, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Esko Seppänen, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Giovanna Corda, Catherine Neris, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
Giovanna Corda, Catherine Neris, Antolín Sánchez Presedo
относно предложението за решение на Съвета за подписването, от името на Европейския съюз, и временното прилагане на някои разпоредби от Протокола между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн за присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно асоциирането на Конфедерация Швейцария към въвеждането, прилагането и развитието на достиженията на правото от Шенген
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
PE 404.817v01-00
PE 404.817v02-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯТА ПО ПРАВНИ ВЪПРОСИ ОТНОСНО ПРАВНОТО ОСНОВАНИЕ 9
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...............9
относно предложението за решение на Съвета за подписването, от името на Европейския съюз, и временното прилагане на някои разпоредби от Протокола между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн за присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно асоциирането на Конфедерация Швейцария към въвеждането, прилагането и развитието на достиженията на правото от Шенген
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2006)0752 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0752 ),
– като взе предвид Протокола между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн за присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно асоциирането на Конфедерация Швейцария към въвеждането, прилагането и развитието на достиженията на правото от Шенген,
– having regard to the protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis,
– като взе предвид член 62, член 63, параграф 3, буква а) и б), членове 66 и 95, и член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 62, Article 63(3)(a) and (b), Articles 66 and 95, and Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0089/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0089/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси относно предложената правна основа,
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,
– като взе предвид член 51 и член 83, параграф 7 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0246/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0246/2008 ),
Предложение за решение на Съвета
Proposal for a Council decision
като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност и по-специално член 62, член 63, параграф 3, букви а) и б), и членове 66 и 95, във връзка с второто изречение на първа алинея от член 300, параграф 2 и първа алинея от член 300, параграф 3 от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 62, 63 point 3 a) and b), 66 and 95 in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300 (3) thereof,
като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност и по-специално член 62, член 63, параграф 3, букви а) и б), и членове 66 и 95, във връзка с второто изречение на първа алинея от член 300, параграф 2 и втора алинея от член 300, параграф 3 от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 62, 63 point 3 a) and b), 66 and 95 in conjunction with the second sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300 (3) thereof,
Позоваване 3
Citation 3
като взе предвид становището на Европейския парламент,
Having regard the opinion of the European Parliament,
като взе предвид съгласието на Европейския парламент,
Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament,
The Protocol to the Schengen acquis Agreement
The Protocol to the Schengen acquis Agreement