natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
57. подчертава в тази връзка точки 42 и 43 от новото МИС; обръща особено внимание на необходимостта Съветът да се консултира с Парламента по бъдещия документ, с който се определят главните аспекти и основните решения в областта на ОВВПС, включително финансовото им отражение, до 15 юни всяка година в пълно съответствие с новото МИС; подчертава, че следва да се включи оценка на предприетите предходната година действия и счита, че като цяло това може да съставлява основа за същинско подобряване на демократичния контрол;
Underlines in this respect Points 42 and 43 of the new InterinstitutionalAgreement; specifically emphasises the need for the Council to consult Parliament on a forward-looking document setting out the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including their financial implications, by 15 June each year in full accordance with the new Interinstitutional Agreement; underlines that an evaluation of the measures launched in the previous year is to be included and believes that, taken together, this could provide the basis for genuinely improved democratic scrutiny;
Изразява съжаление, че най-малко в един случай, Съветът е финансирал някои разходи чрез междуправителствения механизъм за администриране на общите разходи на операциите на Европейския съюз с военни и отбранителни последици (ATHENA), независимо от изразеното ясно становище на Комисията, че въпросните разходи е трябвало да бъдат финансирани от бюджета на ЕС; счита, че при съмнение Съветът и Комисията са задължени да информират и да се консултират с Парламента и не може да приеме едностранни решения на Съвета;
Regrets that, in at least one case, the Council has financed certain costs through the inter-governmental "ATHENA mechanism", even though the Commission clearly considered that the expenditure in question should have been financed from the EU budget; considers that the Council and the Commission have an obligation to inform and consult with Parliament in areas of doubt, and cannot accept unilateral decisions by the Council;
Изисква от Съвета да предостави актуална информация на Парламента относно новите разпоредби, свързани с механизма ATHENA, приет от министрите през декември 2006 г.; изразява изненада от факта, че Съветът не е сметнал за необходимо да информира Парламента по този въпрос на двете съвместни заседания, проведени през есента на 2006 г., предвид факта, че темата е била осъждана по-рано същата година;
Asks the Council to update Parliament on the new provisions concerning the "ATHENA mechanism" adopted by Ministers in December 2006; is surprised that the Council did not see fit to inform Parliament on this matter in the course of the two joint meetings held in the autumn of 2006, given the fact that this item had been discussed earlier in the year;
Напомня в тази връзка своето предложение за нова бюджетна методология, която да засили прозрачността в разходите на ЕПСО и да подкрепи развитието на необходимите военни и граждански умения за изпълнение на целите на Европейската стратегия за сигурност чрез:
Reiterates in this regard its proposal for a new budgetary methodology to enhance transparency in ESDP spending and to support the development of the military and civilian capabilities needed to fulfil the aims of the European Security Strategy by:
(a) в началната фаза, съставяне на бюджетен документ от Съвета, който да отразява ангажиментите, поети от държавите-членки за изпълнение на Основната гражданска цел за 2008 г. и Основната военна цел за 2010 г.;
(a) in an initial phase, the Council drawing up a budgetary document reflecting the commitments made by the Member States to fulfil the Civilian Headline Goal 2008 and the Military Headline Goal 2010;
(б) на втора място, държавите-членки, които се ангажират относно ЕПСО чрез примерен „бюджет”, който трябва съвместно да бъде ежегодно обсъждан от Европейския парламент и парламентите на държавите-членки, в който те ще вложат финансиране на многогодишен принцип за финансиране на необходимите оборудване и персонал за провеждането на операциите на ЕПСО, като по този начин показват готовността на държавите-членки да вложат средства за ЕПСО и да гарантират по-голяма прозрачност във връзка с разходите за военни цели;
(b) in a second phase, the Member States committing themselves to the ESDP through an indicative "budget", to be jointly debated by the European Parliament and the parliaments of Member States on an annual basis, in which they would commit funds on a multi-annual basis to finance the equipment and personnel needed for ESDP operations, thus indicating the Member States' readiness to spend on the ESDP and ensuring greater transparency as regards military spending;
(в) накрая, чрез съвместно взети решения относно рационализирането на бюджета за ОВППС и ЕПСО, в това число отчитането на изразходените национални средства на равнище на ЕС в измерението на сигурността и отбраната, в рамките на преразгледаната финансова система на Съюза, предвидена за периода 2008-2009 г.;
(c) finally, by reaching joint decisions on the rationalisation of the budget for the CFSP and the ESDP, including the accounting of national expenditure at EU level in the security and defence dimension, within the framework of the revised financial system of the Union envisaged for 2008-2009;
Отбелязва, че неусвоените кредити и по-специално събраните вземания по глава ОВППС впоследствие се третират от Комисията като "целеви приходи" по смисъла на Финансовия регламент и се вписват отново по съответните бюджетни редове за следващата година; изразява съмнение, че това действие съответства на разпоредбите на Финансовия регламент и изисква от Сметната палата да разгледа въпроса;
Notes that any underspending, notably recoveries, in the CFSP chapter is subsequently treated by the Commission as "assigned revenue" under the terms of the Financial Regulation and is thus put back on the lines the following year; is not convinced that this is consistent with the provisions of the Financial Regulation, and asks the Court of Auditors to examine this matter;
for the Committee on Foreign Affairs
for the Committee on Foreign Affairs
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Budgets calls on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Welcomes the new Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006, which came into force on 1 January 2007, and which consolidates and enhances the previous CFSP provisions on the regular political consultation with the European Parliament; considers that the implementation of this agreement will be crucial for improved democratic scrutiny of the financing of CFSP actions;
Welcomes the new Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006, which came into force on 1 January 2007, and which consolidates and enhances the previous CFSP provisions on the regular political consultation with the European Parliament; considers that the implementation of this agreement will be crucial for improved democratic scrutiny of the financing of CFSP actions;
Welcomes the reinforcement of the CFSP chapter finally negotiated between Parliament and Council, agreeing that at least EUR 1 740 million will be available for the CFSP over the period 2007-2013; recalls that this level will in fact more than triple the funding level of the old financial perspective and, precisely for that reason, will need to be accompanied by strengthened measures for parliamentary control and improved cooperation on the part of the Council;
Welcomes the reinforcement of the CFSP chapter finally negotiated between Parliament and Council, agreeing that at least EUR 1 740 million will be available for the CFSP over the period 2007-2013; recalls that this level will in fact more than triple the funding level of the old financial perspective and, precisely for that reason, will need to be accompanied by strengthened measures for parliamentary control and improved cooperation on the part of the Council;
Reiterates its disappointment that the Council's annual reports have so far been essentially limited to a description of CFSP activities, as even stated by the Council itself in the preambles, although Article 28 of the EU Treaty provides for a consultation on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including its financial implications, and taking into consideration Parliament's views;
Reiterates its disappointment that the Council's annual reports have so far been essentially limited to a description of CFSP activities, as even stated by the Council itself in the preambles, although Article 28 of the EU Treaty provides for a consultation on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP, including its financial implications, and taking into consideration Parliament's views;
Believes that a genuine assessment of the financial implications for the EU budget has so far been hampered by a lack of pro-active information on the part of the Council even though joint meetings on this issue have been held for the past years; considers that, with the signing of the new IIA, the moment has now come to implement both the letter and the spirit of these provisions which have now been clearly formalised;
Believes that a genuine assessment of the financial implications for the EU budget has so far been hampered by a lack of pro-active information on the part of the Council even though joint meetings on this issue have been held for the past years; considers that, with the signing of the new IIA, the moment has now come to implement both the letter and the spirit of these provisions which have now been clearly formalised;
Regrets the Council's previous attitude of only providing substantial financial information once the final decisions have already been taken, thus defeating the very purpose of the exercise; welcomes however some improvement in this regard, notably in connection with the new Kosovo mission, and expects this to continue on a regular basis;
Regrets the Council's previous attitude of only providing substantial financial information once the final decisions have already been taken, thus defeating the very purpose of the exercise; welcomes however some improvement in this regard, notably in connection with the new Kosovo mission, and expects this to continue on a regular basis;
Underlines in this respect Points 42 and 43 of the new IIA; specifically emphasises the need for Council to consult the Parliament on a forward-looking document setting out the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including their financial implications, by 15 June each year fully in accordance with the new IIA; underlines that an evaluation of the actions launched in the previous year is to be included and believes that, taken together, this could provide the basis for genuinely improved democratic scrutiny;
Underlines in this respect Points 42 and 43 of the new IIA; specifically emphasises the need for Council to consult the Parliament on a forward-looking document setting out the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including their financial implications, by 15 June each year fully in accordance with the new IIA; underlines that an evaluation of the actions launched in the previous year is to be included and believes that, taken together, this could provide the basis for genuinely improved democratic scrutiny;
Expresses particular worry that mixed CFSP actions, entailing expenditure resulting from both civilian actions and actions with military or defence implications, have so far been almost impossible to assess by any parliament; points out that this results from the fragmented situation in which, on the one hand, national parliaments have insight into the military/defence part of the financing and, on the other, the European Parliament has insight into solely the civilian aspects; underlines that these combined civilian and military actions should be able to be scrutinised as to their full scope and therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to cooperate fully in finding ways to obtain an overall picture of these missions and their multiple financing structure;
Expresses particular worry that mixed CFSP actions, entailing expenditure resulting from both civilian actions and actions with military or defence implications, have so far been almost impossible to assess by any parliament; points out that this results from the fragmented situation in which, on the one hand, national parliaments have insight into the military/defence part of the financing and, on the other, the European Parliament has insight into solely the civilian aspects; underlines that these combined civilian and military actions should be able to be scrutinised as to their full scope and therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to cooperate fully in finding ways to obtain an overall picture of these missions and their multiple financing structure;
Recalls that European Union Special Representatives fall under the CFSP budget and that all the relevant provisions of Point 42 of the IIA also apply as regards the financial consequences of the extension of their mandates; is of the opinion that there is a need to establish criteria for the appointment and evaluation of EU Special Representatives, including the definition and purpose of their tasks, length of mandate, coordination and complementarity with the EC delegations under the first pillar and an assessment of their potential "added value"; calls on the Council and Commission to cooperate in this respect including by providing timely access to the evaluation reports, which should include substantial, thorough and objective information and be drawn up under the responsibility of the High Representative;
Recalls that European Union Special Representatives fall under the CFSP budget and that all the relevant provisions of Point 42 of the IIA also apply as regards the financial consequences of the extension of their mandates; is of the opinion that there is a need to establish criteria for the appointment and evaluation of EU Special Representatives, including the definition and purpose of their tasks, length of mandate, coordination and complementarity with the EC delegations under the first pillar and an assessment of their potential "added value"; calls on the Council and Commission to cooperate in this respect including by providing timely access to the evaluation reports, which should include substantial, thorough and objective information and be drawn up under the responsibility of the High Representative;
Regrets that, in at least one case, the Council has financed certain costs through the inter-governmental "Athena mechanism", although the Commission clearly considered that the expenditure in question should have been financed from the EU budget; considers that the Council and the Commission have an obligation to inform and consult with the Parliament in areas of doubt and cannot accept unilateral decisions by the Council;
Regrets that, in at least one case, the Council has financed certain costs through the inter-governmental "Athena mechanism", although the Commission clearly considered that the expenditure in question should have been financed from the EU budget; considers that the Council and the Commission have an obligation to inform and consult with the Parliament in areas of doubt and cannot accept unilateral decisions by the Council;
Asks the Council to update the Parliament on the new provisions concerning the "Athena mechanism" adopted by Ministers in December 2006; is surprised that the Council did not see fit to inform the Parliament on this matter in the course of the two joint meetings held in the autumn of 2006 given the fact that this item had been discussed earlier in the year;
Asks the Council to update the Parliament on the new provisions concerning the "Athena mechanism" adopted by Ministers in December 2006; is surprised that the Council did not see fit to inform the Parliament on this matter in the course of the two joint meetings held in the autumn of 2006 given the fact that this item had been discussed earlier in the year;
Notes that any underspending, notably recoveries, in the CFSP chapter is subsequently treated by the Commission as "assigned revenue" under the terms of the Financial Regulation and is thus put back on the lines the following year; is not convinced that this is consistent with the provisions of the Financial Regulation and asks the Court of Auditors to examine this matter.
Notes that any underspending, notably recoveries, in the CFSP chapter is subsequently treated by the Commission as "assigned revenue" under the terms of the Financial Regulation and is thus put back on the lines the following year; is not convinced that this is consistent with the provisions of the Financial Regulation and asks the Court of Auditors to examine this matter.
Annual report 2005 on CFSP
Annual report 2005 on CFSP
Antonis Samaras
Antonis Samaras
Hans-Peter Martin, Margarita Starkevičiūtė
Hans-Peter Martin, Margarita Starkevičiūtė
Annual report from the Council to the EP on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the EC (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
Annual report from the Council to the EP on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the EC (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
Elmar Brok 13.9.2006
Elmar Brok 13.9.2006
Roberta Alma Anastase, Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Adrian-Mihai Cioroianu, Simon Coveney, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Michael Gahler, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Jana Hybášková, Jelko Kacin, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, Katrin Saks, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Hannes Swoboda, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Josef Zieleniec
Roberta Alma Anastase, Angelika Beer, Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, Elmar Brok, Adrian-Mihai Cioroianu, Simon Coveney, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Michael Gahler, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Jana Hybášková, Jelko Kacin, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Janusz Onyszkiewicz, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Bernd Posselt, Michel Rocard, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Libor Rouček, Katrin Saks, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Hannes Swoboda, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Josef Zieleniec
Giulietto Chiesa , Alexandra Dobolyi , Á rp á d Duka - Z ó lyomi , Glyn Ford , Milan Hor áč ek , Gisela Kallenbach , Tunne Kelam , Jarom í r Kohl íč ek , Evgeni Kirilov , Aloyzas Sakalas , Luis Ya ñ ez - Barnuevo Garc í a
Giulietto Chiesa, Alexandra Dobolyi, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Glyn Ford, Milan Horáček, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Jaromír Kohlíček, Evgeni Kirilov, Aloyzas Sakalas, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García
Proinsias De Rossa, Ria Oomen-Ruijten
Proinsias De Rossa, Ria Oomen-Ruijten
PE 384.259v02-00
PE 384.259v02-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................32
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................29
за общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемане регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно обществените услуги за пътнически превоз с железопътен и автомобилен транспорт и отменяща Регламенти (ЕИО) № 1191/69 и № 1107/70 на Съвета
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (13736/1/2006 – C6‑0042/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13736/1/2006 – C6‑0042/2007 ),
– като взе предвид първото променено предложение на Комисията( COM(2002)0107 )
– having regard to the first amended Commission proposal ( COM(2002)0107 )
– като взе предвид второто променено предложение на Комисията ( COM(2005)0319 )
– having regard to the second amended Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0319 )
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0131/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0131/2007 ),
(10) Contrary to Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, the scope of which extends to public passenger transport services by inland waterway, it is not considered advisable for this Regulation to cover the award of public service contracts in that specific sector.
(10) Contrary to Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, the scope of which extends to public passenger transport services by inland waterway, it is not considered advisable for this Regulation to cover the award of public service contracts in that specific sector.
The organisation of public passenger transport services by inland waterway is therefore subject to compliance with the general principles of the Treaty, unless Member States choose to apply this Regulation to that specific sector .
The organisation of public passenger transport services by inland waterway is therefore subject to compliance with the general principles of the Treaty, unless Member States choose to apply this Regulation to that specific sector .
The provisions of this Regulation do not prevent the integration of inland waterway services into a wider urban, suburban or regional public passenger transport network.
The provisions of this Regulation do not prevent the integration of inland waterway services into a wider urban, suburban or regional public passenger transport network.
(10) В разрез с Регламент (EИО) № 1191/69, чието приложно поле обхваща и обществените услуги за пътнически превоз с вътрешноводен транспорт, не е препоръчително настоящия регламент да обхваща възлагането на договори за обществени услуги в този конкретен сектор.
(10) Contrary to Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, the scope of which extends to public passenger transport services by inland waterway, it is not considered advisable for this Regulation to cover the award of public service contracts in that specific sector.
Следователно организирането на обществените услуги за пътнически превоз с вътрешноводен транспорт и по вътрешни морски води трябва да съответства на общите принципи на Договора, освен ако държавите-членки не решат да приложат настоящия регламент по отношение на тези конкретни сектори .
The organisation of public passenger transport services by inland waterway and by national sea waters is therefore subject to compliance with the general principles of the Treaty, unless Member States choose to apply this Regulation to those specific sectors .