natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The member states want MEPs to recognise that energy from waste can qualify as “recovery”.
The member states want MEPs to recognise that energy from waste can qualify as “recovery”.
To win this argument, they need to understand that MEPs will only vote to accept this IF they have the assurance that recycling and prevention targets will be included in the directive.
To win this argument, they need to understand that MEPs will only vote to accept this IF they have the assurance that recycling and prevention targets will be included in the directive.
Such targets are an insurance policy against energy from waste becoming the dominant means of waste management.
Such targets are an insurance policy against energy from waste becoming the dominant means of waste management.
At its first reading the Parliament adopted improvements to the Commission’s proposals for turning properly treated waste into a recycled product.
At its first reading the Parliament adopted improvements to the Commission’s proposals for turning properly treated waste into a recycled product.
MEPs were concerned to point the way more clearly towards the need for legislative proposals, under the “end of waste” heading, for specifications for compost, aggregates, paper, glass, metal, end of life tyres and waste textiles.
MEPs were concerned to point the way more clearly towards the need for legislative proposals, under the “end of waste” heading, for specifications for compost, aggregates, paper, glass, metal, end of life tyres and waste textiles.
In all these cases, clarifying what rules apply would greatly help the move to recycling.
In all these cases, clarifying what rules apply would greatly help the move to recycling.
It is a shame that at this point the Council lost its nerve and pushed the issue into the recitals.
It is a shame that at this point the Council lost its nerve and pushed the issue into the recitals.
The rapporteur wants more urgent concrete action and has brought the matter back into the text of the directive.
The rapporteur wants more urgent concrete action and has brought the matter back into the text of the directive.
The Council has been bold on the issue of by-products and has included a definition in article 4.
The Council has been bold on the issue of by-products and has included a definition in article 4.
Those lobbying the Parliament are completely split on the issue.
Those lobbying the Parliament are completely split on the issue.
The rapporteur believes that this chance to settle on a definition should be seized and not postponed to an unknown date.
The rapporteur believes that this chance to settle on a definition should be seized and not postponed to an unknown date.
The directive takes over two existing directives- on hazardous waste and on waste oils.
The directive takes over two existing directives- on hazardous waste and on waste oils.
Many colleagues were uneasy that too many aspects of the existing hazardous waste directive were not being carried over into the waste framework directive.
Many colleagues were uneasy that too many aspects of the existing hazardous waste directive were not being carried over into the waste framework directive.
The rapporteur has therefore proposed to reinstate some of the amendments proposed at first reading to remedy this.
The rapporteur has therefore proposed to reinstate some of the amendments proposed at first reading to remedy this.
When the directive first appeared, it looked as if it might damage the interests of waste oil regenerators: the rapporteur is satisfied that the Common Position now strikes the right notes on this issue.
When the directive first appeared, it looked as if it might damage the interests of waste oil regenerators: the rapporteur is satisfied that the Common Position now strikes the right notes on this issue.
The rapporteur welcomes the Council’s text on biowaste, and draws attention to the minor additions which, she feels, should still be made on the subject of producer responsibility
The rapporteur welcomes the Council’s text on biowaste, and draws attention to the minor additions which, she feels, should still be made on the subject of producer responsibility
The rapporteur hopes that the directive that finally emerges will be sufficiently clear to avoid further recourse to the European Court of Justice.
The rapporteur hopes that the directive that finally emerges will be sufficiently clear to avoid further recourse to the European Court of Justice.
Safe and sustainable waste management is an important issue for all of us.
Safe and sustainable waste management is an important issue for all of us.
We really must try to get it right this time.
We really must try to get it right this time.
13.2.2007 г. T6-0029/2007
13.2.2007 T6-0029/2007
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Inés Ayala Sender, Bairbre de Brún, Milan Gaľa, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Anne Laperrouze, Johannes Lebech, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Bart Staes
Inés Ayala Sender, Bairbre de Brún, Milan Gaľa, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Anne Laperrouze, Johannes Lebech, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Bart Staes
PE 400.605v03-00
PE 400.605v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по регионално развитие ...................................13
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................12
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по рибно стопанство ........................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................16
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията, озаглавено "Интегрирана морска политика за Европейския съюз" ( COM(2007)0575 , SEC(2007)1283 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union' ( COM(2007)0575 , SEC(2007)1283 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията, озаглавено "Заключения от консултациите относно европейска морска политика" (СOM(2007)0574),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Conclusions from the Consultation on a European Maritime Policy' ( COM(2007)0574 ),
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията за съвместна тристранна декларация за въвеждане на "Европейски ден на морето",
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a joint tripartite declaration establishing a 'European Maritime Day',
– като взе предвид Зелената книга на Комисията, озаглавена "Към бъдеща морска политика за ЕС: Европейска визия за океаните и моретата" ( COM(2006)0275 ) и резолюцията на Парламента от 12 юли 2007 г.
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper entitled 'Towards a future maritime policy for the Union: a European vision for the oceans and seas' ( COM(2006)0275 ) and the Parliament's resolution of 12 July 2007
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0343 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0343 . ,
– като взе предвид заключенията на председателството на Европейския съвет от 8 и 9 март 2007 г. относно приемането на документ "План за действие на Европейския съвет (2007–2009) - енергийна политика за Европа" от страна на Европейския съвет,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the European Council of 8 - 9 March 2007 on the adoption by the European Council of a 'European Council Action Plan (2007-2009) – Energy Policy for Europe',
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията, озаглавено "20% - 20% до 2020 година. - Възможностите на Европа пред климатичните промени" (СOM(2008)0030,
– having regard to the Commission communication '20 20 by 2020 – Europe's climate change opportunity' ( COM(2008)0030 ),
– като взе предвид разпоредбите, установени в Конвенцията за морски труд от 2006 г., приета от Международната организация на труда (МОТ) на 23 февруари 2006 г. като единен инструмент, който обхваща и адаптира конвенциите за морски труд, приети от МОТ в периода от 1919 г. насам,
– having regard to the provisions laid down in the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, adopted by the International Labour Organization (ILO) on 23 February 2006, a single instrument encompassing and adapting the maritime labour conventions adopted by the ILO since 1919,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по транспорт и туризъм и становищата на комисията по регионално развитие, комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика и комисията по рибно стопанство ( A6‑0163/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0163/2008 ),
A. като има предвид, че океаните и моретата са ключови фактори от икономическа и екологична гледна точка за Европейския съюз; като има предвид, че ЕС - с крайбрежните си райони и най-отдалечените райони - разполага с крайбрежна линия, дълга 320 000 км, край която живее една трета от населението на Европа,
A. whereas the oceans and seas are essential economic and environmental factors for the EU; whereas the EU, through its coastal and outermost regions, offers 320 000 km of coastline which is home to a third of Europe's population,
Б. като има предвид, че свързаните с морето индустрия и услуги, както и крайбрежните райони, осигуряват 40% от брутния вътрешен продукт на ЕС,
B. whereas marine-based industries and services, together with the coastal regions, contribute 40 % of EU GDP,
В. като има предвид, че изменението на климата е най-голямото предизвикателство за всички политики през 21-ви век; като взе предвид опасността за крайбрежните райони, която представлява предизвиканото от климата покачване на морското равнище, което може да придобие изключително голям мащаб и да има драстични последици за населението,
C. whereas climate change is the greatest challenge of all policies in the 21st century; having regard to the threat posed to coastal regions by the climate-induced rise in sea levels, which may be on a massive scale, with drastic consequences for residents,
Г. като има предвид, че морските райони на ЕС, и по-специално най-отдалечените райони, играят ключова роля за безопасността и сигурността по отношение на престъпни деяния, като например незаконна имиграция, тероризъм и контрабанда, но при все това те са изложени на специфични екологични бедствия,
D. whereas the EU maritime regions, and particularly its outermost regions, play a very important role regarding safety and security against criminal acts such as illegal immigration, terrorism and smuggling and yet they are exposed to specific environmental disasters,
2. потвърждава своята резолюция от 12 юли 2007 г. и приветства факта, че Комисията е приела голяма част от исканията на Европейския парламент поне в някаква степен;
Reaffirms its resolution of 12 July 2007 and welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken over a fair proportion of the requests made by the Parliament, at least to some extent;
8. счита, че морските клъстери могат действително да допринесат за постигането на интегрирана морска политика; призовава Комисията да пристъпи незабавно към проекта за Европейска мрежа на морските клъстери;
Takes the view that maritime clusters are particularly well placed to make a contribution to achieving an integrated maritime policy; calls on the Commission to make a prompt start with the project for a European network of maritime clusters;
10. счита обаче като цяло, че планът за действие съдържа твърде малко практически мерки и насърчава Комисията в бъдеще да използва по-амбициозно инструментите, които й се полагат по силата на Договорите;
Takes the overall view, however, that the Action Plan includes too few practical measures and encourages the Commission to be more ambitious in future in using the instruments at its disposal under the Treaties;
15. настоятелно приканва Комисията да прояви повече амбиция в борбата с емисиите на сяра и азотни оксиди, както и твърдите отпадъци от корабите; в тази връзка, повтаря необходимостта от по-тясно сътрудничество с Международната морска организация (ММО) и, по-специално, своите призиви за:
Calls emphatically on the Commission to be more ambitious in combating sulphur and nitrogen oxide emissions, as well as solid waste from ships; in this connection, reiterates the need for closer cooperation with the IMO (International Maritime Organization) and, in particular, its calls for:
· въвеждане на норми за емисии на азотни оксиди за кораби, които използват пристанища на ЕС;
· the introduction of nitrogen oxide emission standards for ships using EU ports;
· обявяване на Средиземно море, Черно море и на североизточната част на Атлантическия океан за зони за контрол на серните емисии (SECA) съгласно Конвенцията MARPOL;
· the designation of the Mediterranean Sea, the Black Sea and the North-East Atlantic as Sulphur Emission Control Areas (SECAs) under the MARPOL Convention;
· намаляване на максимално допустимото съдържание на сяра в корабните горива от 1,5 % на 0,5 % за пътуващите в SECA пътнически кораби;
· the reduction of the maximum permitted sulphur content in marine fuels used in SECAs by passenger vessels from 1,5 % to 0,5 %;
· въвеждане на фискални мерки като данъци или такси върху емисиите на серен диоксид и азотни оксиди от кораби и определяне на начини на налагане на такива мерки и такси за всички кораби, независимо от флага, които влизат в пристанища на Общността или плават във водите на държави-членки на ЕС;
· the introduction of fiscal measures, such as taxes or charges on sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from ships and the identification of ways of imposing such measures and charges on all ships, regardless of flag, putting into Community ports or sailing within the waters of EU Member States;
· насърчаване на въвеждането на диференцирани такси за пристанищата и фарватера, които да облагодетелстват кораби с ниски емисии на серен диоксид и азотни оксиди;
· promotion of the introduction of differentiated harbour and waterway charges to favour ships with low sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions;
· постепенното въвеждане на изискване за това намиращи се в пристанища кораби да използват електричество, получавано от сушата
· the gradual introduction of a requirement for ships at ports to use land-based electricity
· предложение за директива на ЕС относно качеството на корабните горива;
· a proposal for an EU directive on the quality of marine fuels;
20. счита, че Рамковата директива за морската стратегия следва да представлява крайъгълен камък от екологична гледна точка на интегрираната морска политика за ЕС; отбелязва, че директивата гласи, че райони, в които състоянието на морето е критично, следва да разработят и приложат по-бързи мерки за постигане на добро екологично състояние; подчертава, че в такива райони е особено важно Комисията да координира различните сектори, програми и стратегии и да предоставя достатъчна финансова подкрепа; изтъква, че за да се постигне такава интегрирана морска политика е необходимо да се включат наземни дейности като земеделие, управление на отпадъчните води, транспорт и производство на енергия; счита, че такива райони могат да представляват пилотни райони за реална и напълно интегрирана морска политика;
Considers that the marine strategy framework Directive should constitute the environmental cornerstone of the integrated maritime policy for the EU; notes that the Directive states that regions in which the state of the sea is critical should draw up and implement faster measures to achieve good environmental status; emphasises that in such regions, it is particularly important that the Commission should coordinate different sectors, programmes and strategies and provide sufficient financial support; points out that in order to achieve such an integrated maritime policy, it is necessary to include land-based activities such as agriculture, waste water management, transport and energy production; believes that such regions can constitute pilot areas for a genuine and fully integrated maritime policy;
Директива 98/59/EО
Welcomes the Commission's stocktaking with regard to the exclusion of seafarers from a number of areas of European social and labour protection rules (e.g. Directive 98/59/EC
25. възобновява призива си и в бъдеще да продължи да бъде следван пътят към интегрирана морска политика за ЕС и призовава Комисията да укрепи нейната политическа рамка, както и териториалното, социалното и икономическото сближаване с континентална Европа и нейните политики; предлага публикуването на доклад за европейската морска политика на всеки две години, както и редовен публичен обмен на мнения с всички участващи страни; призовава бъдещите председателства на Съвета, в рамките на своята работна програма, да обърнат внимание на морската политика; преди всичко, призовава Комисията всяка година ясно да определя всички финансирани от ЕС и свързани с морето проекти;
Renews its call for the approach to an integrated maritime policy for the EU to be continued in future and calls on the Commission to strengthen the political framework thereof, as well as the territorial, social, and economic cohesion providing the link to inland Europe and its constituent policies; proposes that a report on European maritime policy be published every two years and that a regular public exchange of views be held with all those involved; calls on future Council presidencies to deal with maritime policy as part of their work programmes; over and above this, calls for all maritime-related projects supported by EU funding to be clearly identified annually by the Commission;
28. изразява подкрепа за това морската политика да намери подобаващо място в бюджета и в инструментите на ЕС след 2013 г. и призовава това да бъде отразено в резюмета в редовните доклади относно европейската морска политика;
Declares itself in favour of maritime policy being given appropriate consideration in the EU budget and instruments after 2013 and calls for this to be reflected in summaries in the regular reports on the European maritime policy;
The presentation of the Commission communication and Action Plan 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union' in October 2007, following the tabling of the Green Paper on maritime policy in June 2006 and a one-year consultation period, marks the start of its attempt to embark on the next stage of determining practical policies and measures for a future common European maritime policy.
The presentation of the Commission communication and Action Plan 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union' in October 2007, following the tabling of the Green Paper on maritime policy in June 2006 and a one-year consultation period, marks the start of its attempt to embark on the next stage of determining practical policies and measures for a future common European maritime policy.
Your rapporteur welcomes the fact that a fair proportion of the demands made in Parliament's resolution of July 2007 has been accepted.
Your rapporteur welcomes the fact that a fair proportion of the demands made in Parliament's resolution of July 2007 has been accepted.
This report is, accordingly, a follow-up as part of this process.
This report is, accordingly, a follow-up as part of this process.
However, your rapporteur finds that the tabling of the new documents shows what was already previously suspected: there generally seems to be broad acceptance among the Member States, regions and sectors concerned of the Commission's approach to the integrated maritime policy, but the framing of practical sectoral policies has now shown how serious and committed that acceptance was meant to be, because there is an absence of genuinely practical proposals, measures and policies.
However, your rapporteur finds that the tabling of the new documents shows what was already previously suspected: there generally seems to be broad acceptance among the Member States, regions and sectors concerned of the Commission's approach to the integrated maritime policy, but the framing of practical sectoral policies has now shown how serious and committed that acceptance was meant to be, because there is an absence of genuinely practical proposals, measures and policies.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes to concentrate on the most important demands made in the Parliament report of July 2007 and now determine practical policies.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes to concentrate on the most important demands made in the Parliament report of July 2007 and now determine practical policies.
It is particularly worth stressing that this report does not include any new proposals; instead, all the selected demands were already included in Parliament's resolution of July 2007.
It is particularly worth stressing that this report does not include any new proposals; instead, all the selected demands were already included in Parliament's resolution of July 2007.
Your rapporteur is convinced that the following formula should be the fulcrum, as the goal of all endeavours: Europe's oceans and seas – the cleanest in the world, with the most stable biodiversity, the most profitable economy, the best research and technology, the most modern and cleanest shipping, the best education and training and the most innovative ideas.
Your rapporteur is convinced that the following formula should be the fulcrum, as the goal of all endeavours: Europe's oceans and seas – the cleanest in the world, with the most stable biodiversity, the most profitable economy, the best research and technology, the most modern and cleanest shipping, the best education and training and the most innovative ideas.
Since the presentation of the fourth assessment report by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007 there has been a worldwide scientific consensus about the challenges of climate change.
Since the presentation of the fourth assessment report by the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007 there has been a worldwide scientific consensus about the challenges of climate change.
It is undisputed that the future European maritime policy must address a substantial proportion of these challenges.
It is undisputed that the future European maritime policy must address a substantial proportion of these challenges.
The warming of the oceans is leading to a rise in sea levels.
The warming of the oceans is leading to a rise in sea levels.
Your rapporteur takes the view that this finding must be reflected in the policy areas of coastal protection, maritime spatial planning, tourism and ports.
Your rapporteur takes the view that this finding must be reflected in the policy areas of coastal protection, maritime spatial planning, tourism and ports.