natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
There are many feedback effects between the various stages in the innovation process, which is best considered as a system, where institutional relationships and the flows of knowledge between actors are of critical importance."
There are many feedback effects between the various stages in the innovation process, which is best considered as a system, where institutional relationships and the flows of knowledge between actors are of critical importance."
"Against the background of limited resources for R&D it has become even more important to ensure that scarce funds are spent as effectively as possible.
"Against the background of limited resources for R&D it has become even more important to ensure that scarce funds are spent as effectively as possible.
However, the already negative effects of Europe's relatively low investment in research (...) are compounded by a number of structural deficits inherent in the European R&D system.
However, the already negative effects of Europe's relatively low investment in research (...) are compounded by a number of structural deficits inherent in the European R&D system.
These systemic weaknesses make Europe a less-attractive place for R&D investors and researchers, and produce a wasteful fragmentation of research efforts.
These systemic weaknesses make Europe a less-attractive place for R&D investors and researchers, and produce a wasteful fragmentation of research efforts.
At the heart of the problem is the issue of research governance in Europe.
At the heart of the problem is the issue of research governance in Europe.
In particular, the question arises of how best to allocate policy competences and resources across the different organizational levels of public authority - local/regional, national and EU."
In particular, the question arises of how best to allocate policy competences and resources across the different organizational levels of public authority - local/regional, national and EU."
idem p.
idem p.
ERA Contribution
ERA Contribution
In the EU there has been an increasing awareness of the need to better organize the multi-level governance systems for research in order to ensure greater complementarities of policies, to reduce fragmentation of funding and to avoid duplication of efforts.
In the EU there has been an increasing awareness of the need to better organize the multi-level governance systems for research in order to ensure greater complementarities of policies, to reduce fragmentation of funding and to avoid duplication of efforts.
There is also evidence of the increasing regionalization.
There is also evidence of the increasing regionalization.
The success of areas like Silicon Valley and Cambridge has convinced governments of the need to create more of these innovative knowledge clusters.
The success of areas like Silicon Valley and Cambridge has convinced governments of the need to create more of these innovative knowledge clusters.
"On the other hand .... there has been a significant growth in the scale and scope of the EU level of intervention.
"On the other hand .... there has been a significant growth in the scale and scope of the EU level of intervention.
Since the 1st Framework Programme in 1984, European research policy has expanded in terms of its ambition and its budget. ...
Since the 1st Framework Programme in 1984, European research policy has expanded in terms of its ambition and its budget. ...
However,.... research and innovation policies continue to be pursued largely in parallel -at national, EU and regional levels- leading to what some have called a "governance gap" of poor integration and coordination between these different levels"
However,.... research and innovation policies continue to be pursued largely in parallel -at national, EU and regional levels- leading to what some have called a "governance gap" of poor integration and coordination between these different levels"
Unlike the United States or Japan, European research still represents a “puzzle” of national public systems.
Unlike the United States or Japan, European research still represents a “puzzle” of national public systems.
National activities, governed by 27 varying legislative, regulatory and financial structures, are still largely undertaken independently of one another
National activities, governed by 27 varying legislative, regulatory and financial structures, are still largely undertaken independently of one another
The example of basic research illustrates these issues.
The example of basic research illustrates these issues.
Its funding is dispersed across the Union, and consequently, many projects lack the necessary critical mass.
Its funding is dispersed across the Union, and consequently, many projects lack the necessary critical mass.
The amount spent by Johns Hopkins University on basic research exceeds the individual efforts of 18 EU MS’s, and is greater than the combined efforts of the 10 new MS’s.
The amount spent by Johns Hopkins University on basic research exceeds the individual efforts of 18 EU MS’s, and is greater than the combined efforts of the 10 new MS’s.
The EU already helps to compensate funding trans-national collaborative research under the FP’s.
The EU already helps to compensate funding trans-national collaborative research under the FP’s.
However, the financial support the EU can offer today is limited.
However, the financial support the EU can offer today is limited.
Community efforts represent a 28th research policy , with a budget of only around 6% of public funding, it cannot be sufficiently dynamic to have a truly integrating effect on national policies.
Community efforts represent a 28th research policy , with a budget of only around 6% of public funding, it cannot be sufficiently dynamic to have a truly integrating effect on national policies.
The European Research Area (ERA) initiative was launched in March 2000 to tackle these issues, but despite the progress achieved in these years, greater coordination and cooperation had to be achieved throughout Europe.
The European Research Area (ERA) initiative was launched in March 2000 to tackle these issues, but despite the progress achieved in these years, greater coordination and cooperation had to be achieved throughout Europe.
"More links had to be established between the different players (public authorities, firms, universities, research institutes) at all policy levels (regional, national, Community, inter-governmental) in the European research system."
"More links had to be established between the different players (public authorities, firms, universities, research institutes) at all policy levels (regional, national, Community, inter-governmental) in the European research system."
On the other hand, the context has evolved considerably since 2000:
On the other hand, the context has evolved considerably since 2000:
- Globalization has accelerated and knowledge is a key component of this new global dynamic.
- Globalization has accelerated and knowledge is a key component of this new global dynamic.
An increasing share of global R&D will be located outside Europe
An increasing share of global R&D will be located outside Europe
China and India have emerged as global S&T actors.
China and India have emerged as global S&T actors.
India increased its R&D spending threefold over the last decade, building on average economic growth of 8% since 2003.
India increased its R&D spending threefold over the last decade, building on average economic growth of 8% since 2003.
China is one of the world's largest spenders and it is expected to catch up with the EU by 2009 in terms of R&D intensity (since 2004, is producing 3 times more engineers than the US and has the same number of full time researchers as all EU MS’s together) . and, given the current trends, Europe's share of research will one day represent less than 10% of global knowledge production.
China is one of the world's largest spenders and it is expected to catch up with the EU by 2009 in terms of R&D intensity (since 2004, is producing 3 times more engineers than the US and has the same number of full time researchers as all EU MS’s together) . and, given the current trends, Europe's share of research will one day represent less than 10% of global knowledge production.
- Various socio-economic challenges are grown – increased socio-economic disparities, climate change, ageing, and risks of infectious diseases – and there is a consensus that stronger concerted actions are needed at EU and global level, notably in science and technology.
- Various socio-economic challenges are grown – increased socio-economic disparities, climate change, ageing, and risks of infectious diseases – and there is a consensus that stronger concerted actions are needed at EU and global level, notably in science and technology.
- The European research landscape has evolved with the launching of the 7 th FP, containing new measures such as the European Research Council (ERC), but also through various ERA specific measures, as well as the wider diversity of scientific cultures that have come with the expanded EU
- The European research landscape has evolved with the launching of the 7 th FP, containing new measures such as the European Research Council (ERC), but also through various ERA specific measures, as well as the wider diversity of scientific cultures that have come with the expanded EU
With the access of Romania and Bulgaria, the EU population has raised to around 490 million people, the world's third largest population area after China and India.
With the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, the EU population has risen to around 490 million people, the world's third largest population area after China and India.
The EU is the world's leading market in terms of demand for knowledge-intensive products.
The EU is the world's leading market in terms of demand for knowledge-intensive products.
Studies have shown that demand for such products is a major driver of R&D location and investment decisions.
Studies have shown that demand for such products is a major driver of R&D location and investment decisions.
The problem is, however, that a single EU market for S&T intensive products does not exist yet.
The problem is, however, that a single EU market for S&T intensive products does not exist yet.
Several barriers persist: different national legislation, different technical standards, specificities in local markets, etc. .
Several barriers persist: different national legislation, different technical standards, specificities in local markets, etc. .
The EU has a long tradition of excellence in R&D, but this excellence is often scattered across Europe, with 80% of public research being conducted at national level, mainly under national or regional research programmes.
The EU has a long tradition of excellence in R&D, but this excellence is often scattered across Europe, with 80% of public research being conducted at national level, mainly under national or regional research programmes.
This all too often means that the potential of EU research is not fully exploited.
This all too often means that the potential of EU research is not fully exploited.
The Commission Green Paper points out crucial issues cutting across all dimensions of the ERA:
The Commission Green Paper points out crucial issues cutting across all dimensions of the ERA:
- The creation of an 'internal market' for research - an area of free movement of knowledge, researchers and technology - with the aim of increasing cooperation, stimulating innovation and achieving a better allocation of resources;
- The creation of an 'internal market' for research - an area of free movement of knowledge, researchers and technology - with the aim of increasing cooperation, stimulating innovation and achieving a better allocation of resources;
The development of a European research policy deeply rooted in European society.
The development of a European research policy deeply rooted in European society.
It should support advancement in fields of a major public concern, such as health, energy and climate change.
It should support advancement in fields of a major public concern, such as health, energy and climate change.
- A restructuring of the research fabric in Europe is needed to achieve a balance between competition and cooperation and in order to develop world-class excellence.
- A restructuring of the research fabric in Europe is needed to achieve a balance between competition and cooperation and in order to develop world-class excellence.
- European research must fully benefit from Europe's diversity, which has been enriched with the recent EU enlargements.
- European research must fully benefit from Europe's diversity, which has been enriched with the recent EU enlargements.
These issues should be the core of an institutional and public debate aimed to prepare initiatives for 2008, as we approach the review of the first three-year cycle of the renewed Lisbon Strategy and the launch of the second cycle.
These issues should be the core of an institutional and public debate aimed to prepare initiatives for 2008, as we approach the review of the first three-year cycle of the renewed Lisbon Strategy and the launch of the second cycle.
While the original ERA objectives remain valid today, a more dynamic approach is needed.
While the original ERA objectives remain valid today, a more dynamic approach is needed.
Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, B., Vanslembrouck, S., "A new Deal for an Effective European Research Policy - The Design and Impacts of the 7th Framework Programme", 2006, p.
Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, B., Vanslembrouck, S., "A new Deal for an Effective European Research Policy - The Design and Impacts of the 7th Framework Programme", 2006, p.
263, 264 "This calls not for a piecemeal raising of effectiveness and impact, but for making effectiveness and impact the key priorities.... action should be taken where most effective.
263, 264 "This calls not for a piecemeal raising of effectiveness and impact, but for making effectiveness and impact the key priorities.... action should be taken where most effective.
This means a reallocation of responsibilities and assumes going beyond the existing structure of the European research system...."
This means a reallocation of responsibilities and assumes going beyond the existing structure of the European research system...."
"This " New Deal " would involve a more ambitious approach towards the realisation of the European Research Area.....
"This " New Deal " would involve a more ambitious approach towards the realisation of the European Research Area.....
Unlike the original ERA initiative, it does not simply promote the establishment of links between existing European S&T players, each with their own existing roles and responsibilities.....
Unlike the original ERA initiative, it does not simply promote the establishment of links between existing European S&T players, each with their own existing roles and responsibilities.....
It is, above all, important to keep an open mind about the outcome of this debate and inquiry.
It is, above all, important to keep an open mind about the outcome of this debate and inquiry.
It could mean an expansion of national or regional activities in some areas.
It could mean an expansion of national or regional activities in some areas.
It could lead to an increase in EU-level actions in others.
It could lead to an increase in EU-level actions in others.
It may even result in a need to build new, common European S&T institutions"
It may even result in a need to build new, common European S&T institutions"
266. , looking at organizations like CERN and ESA, good examples of success stories.
266. , looking at organizations like CERN and ESA, good examples of success stories.
"The New Deal would mean preparing these decisions together based on solid, shared evidence, and bravely facing"
"The New Deal would mean preparing these decisions together based on solid, shared evidence, and bravely facing"
idem, the changes.
idem, the changes.
The EU ability to do so could herald a new phase for European research.
The EU ability to do so could herald a new phase for European research.
относно Европейското научноизследователско пространство: Нови перспективи
on The European Research Area: New Perspectives
Комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите приканва водещата комисия по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
15. , като се вземат предвид нуждите на научните изследователи; също така подкрепя предложението на Комисията за създаване на система за синя карта, която ще бъде от голяма полза за човешките ресурси, заети в областта на науката и технологиите, които не попадат в обхвата на директивата ;
15 . , taking full account of the needs of researchers ; also gives supports to the Commission's proposal for the creation of a blue card system which would be of great value for human resources in S&T not covered by the directive;
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Corina Crețu, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Илияна Малинова Йотова, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Николай Младенов, Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Alexander Stubb, Marianne Thyssen, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Corina Creţu, Mia De Vits, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Anna Hedh, Iliana Malinova Iotova, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, , Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Alexander Stubb, Marianne Thyssen, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon
Emmanouil Angelakas, André Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Ieke van den Burg, Colm Burke, Giovanna Corda, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Manuel Medina Ortega
Emmanouil Angelakas, André Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Ieke van den Burg, Colm Burke, Giovanna Corda, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Manuel Medina Ortega
Roland Gewalt,
Roland Gewalt,
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Wolfgang Bulfon, Bairbre de Brún, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Филиз Хакъева Хюсменова, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Румяна Желева, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Евгени Кирилов, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Miroslav Mikolášik, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Vladimír Železný
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Wolfgang Bulfon, Bairbre de Brún, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Rumiana Jeleva, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Miroslav Mikolášik, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Vladimír Železný
Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Zita Pleštinská, Samuli Pohjamo, Grażyna Staniszewska, Iuliu Winkler,
Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Zita Pleštinská, Samuli Pohjamo, Grażyna Staniszewska, Iuliu Winkler,
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Renato Brunetta, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Gunnar Hökmark, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Атанас Папаризов, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Renato Brunetta, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Gunnar Hökmark, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Pia Elda Locatelli, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Danutė Budreikaitė, Joan Calabuig Rull, Edit Herczog, Toine Manders, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Pierre Pribetich, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Владимир Уручев
Danutė Budreikaitė, Joan Calabuig Rull, Edit Herczog, Toine Manders, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Pierre Pribetich, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev
Anders Wijkman , комисия по развитие,
Anders Wijkman , Committee on Development,
Eija-Riitta Korhola , Комисия по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните
Eija-Riitta Korhola , Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
(*) Процедура с асоциирани комисии - член 47 от Правилника за дейността
(*) Procedure with associated committees - Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
PE 396.509
PE 396.509v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на Комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните (*) Error!
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (*) 14
относно Световния фонд за енергийна ефективност и възобновяема енергия
on Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията, озаглавено „Мобилизиране на обществени и частни финансови средства за всеобщ достъп до щадящи климата, достъпни и сигурни енергийни услуги: Световен фонд за енергийна ефективност и възобновяема енергия ( COM(2006)0583 )“,
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled Mobilising public and private finance towards global access to climate-friendly, affordable and secure energy services: The Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund ( COM(2006)0583 ),
– като взе предвид заключенията на председателството на Европейския съвет в Брюксел, състоял се на 8 и 9 март 2007 г.,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 8 and 9 March 2007,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 25 септември 2007 г. относно Пътна карта за възобновяема енергия в Европа
– having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2007 on the Road Map for renewable energy in Europe
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0406 . ,
Texts adopted, P6_TA (2007)0406. ,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 1 юни 2006 г. относно Зелената книга „Енергийната ефективност или как да правим повече с по-малко“
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on Energy efficiency or doing more with less - Green Paper
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 14 декември 2006 г. относно стратегия за биомасата и биогоривата
– having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2006 on a strategy for biomass and biofuels
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 29 септември 2005 г. относно дела на възобновяемите енергийни източници в ЕС и предложенията за конкретни действия
– having regard its resolution of 29 September 2005 on the share of renewable energy in the EU and proposals for concrete actions