natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Условията на сътрудничество между Агенцията и Института се определят в споразумителен протокол съгласно член 7 от Регламент (ЕО) №168/2007 .
The arrangements for cooperation between the Agency and the Institute shall be laid down in a memorandum of understanding in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 .
The rapporteur, as well as the European Parliament as whole, welcomes the establishment of the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) earlier this year.
The rapporteur, as well as the European Parliament as whole, welcomes the establishment of the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA) earlier this year.
The transformation of the European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia into a fully fledged FRA will provide the EU institutions with essential tools to assist the legislators and the European Commission in the defence and further promotion of fundamental rights throughout the EU.
The transformation of the European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia into a fully fledged FRA will provide the EU institutions with essential tools to assist the legislators and the European Commission in the defence and further promotion of fundamental rights throughout the EU.
Whilst the rapporteur welcomes and acknowledges the excellent interinstitutional collaboration which led to the adoption of Regulation 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, he is nevertheless disappointed that such collaboration seems less than forthcoming from the other institutions when it comes to the drawing up of the Multiannual Framework (MAF) for the Agency.
Whilst the rapporteur welcomes and acknowledges the excellent interinstitutional collaboration which led to the adoption of Regulation 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, he is nevertheless disappointed that such collaboration seems less than forthcoming from the other institutions when it comes to the drawing up of the Multiannual Framework (MAF) for the Agency.
It seems somewhat ironic that the Commission and the Council Presidency are urging the European Parliament to give its position by the end of 2007 (an extremely short timetable given the delays in submitting and presenting the proposal) when neither the Commission nor the Council appear to see the conclusion of an agreement on this dossier and the nomination of a Director as a priority of paramount importance.
It seems somewhat ironic that the Commission and the Council Presidency are urging the European Parliament to give its position by the end of 2007 (an extremely short timetable given the delays in submitting and presenting the proposal) when neither the Commission nor the Council appear to see the conclusion of an agreement on this dossier and the nomination of a Director as a priority of paramount importance.
Due to the lengthy negotiations on Regulation 168/2007, the Agency was only officially established on 1st March 2007 (it had been hoped that it would be up and running by 1st January 2007).
Due to the lengthy negotiations on Regulation 168/2007, the Agency was only officially established on 1st March 2007 (it had been hoped that it would be up and running by 1st January 2007).
Despite its official establishment the FRA remains in a void given that it is still lacking the basic elements which would enable it to become fully operational (that is to say a Director and a MAF).
Despite its official establishment the FRA remains in a void given that it is still lacking the basic elements which would enable it to become fully operational (that is to say a Director and a MAF).
The rapporteur acknowledges the importance of the swift adoption of a MAF for the FRA as well as the nomination of a Director in order to allow the Agency to finally become fully operation and start to serve the EU's institutions and its citizens.
The rapporteur acknowledges the importance of the swift adoption of a MAF for the FRA as well as the nomination of a Director in order to allow the Agency to finally become fully operation and start to serve the EU's institutions and its citizens.
To this end, his report expressly seeks to amend the MAF in a minimum number of areas.
To this end, his report expressly seeks to amend the MAF in a minimum number of areas.
It is hoped that this signal of good faith on behalf of the rapporteur will facilitate a rapid agreement on the MAF by the EU institutions.
It is hoped that this signal of good faith on behalf of the rapporteur will facilitate a rapid agreement on the MAF by the EU institutions.
This said, the rapporteur would like to urge the Commission and Council to do all they can to speed up the process of selecting candidates for the post of Director as well as accelerating their work on the MAF.
This said, the rapporteur would like to urge the Commission and Council to do all they can to speed up the process of selecting candidates for the post of Director as well as accelerating their work on the MAF.
This is, in his opinion, essential if we are to ensure the FRA can be active as soon as possible (something which the rapporteur and the EP alike wish to see).
This is, in his opinion, essential if we are to ensure the FRA can be active as soon as possible (something which the rapporteur and the EP alike wish to see).
The rapporteur would, of course, welcome and urge the other institutions to involve the European Parliament in this process as much as is possible.
The rapporteur would, of course, welcome and urge the other institutions to involve the European Parliament in this process as much as is possible.
This will add legitimacy to both the negotiations on the MAF and the FRA as a body once its programme is agreed.
This will add legitimacy to both the negotiations on the MAF and the FRA as a body once its programme is agreed.
The Commission and the Council Presidency are the institutions which must show their commitment to fundamental rights, taking the initiative and leadership on this dossier.
The Commission and the Council Presidency are the institutions which must show their commitment to fundamental rights, taking the initiative and leadership on this dossier.
Whilst the European Parliament is merely being consulted on this dossier, the rapporteur would like to reiterate the indivisibility and inviolability of all fundamental rights as the most important and basic of values within the EU - of defence of which the European Parliament takes very seriously.
Whilst the European Parliament is merely being consulted on this dossier, the rapporteur would like to reiterate the indivisibility and inviolability of all fundamental rights as the most important and basic of values within the EU - of defence of which the European Parliament takes very seriously.
The European Parliament will continue to scrutinise the other institutions' role in the development of the FRA, its MAF and the work undertaken in the field of the defence and promotion of fundamental rights.
The European Parliament will continue to scrutinise the other institutions' role in the development of the FRA, its MAF and the work undertaken in the field of the defence and promotion of fundamental rights.
Our citizens will not tolerate a weakening or softening of our core values at the expense of short term political, economic or social considerations.
Our citizens will not tolerate a weakening or softening of our core values at the expense of short term political, economic or social considerations.
Rapporteur's amendments
Rapporteur's amendments
As mentioned above the rapporteur has expressly decided to limit his amendments in number in order to facilitate a swift agreement on the dossier with the other institutions.
As mentioned above the rapporteur has expressly decided to limit his amendments in number in order to facilitate a swift agreement on the dossier with the other institutions.
This said, the amendments which he has introduced in his report are of key importance to the European Parliament.
This said, the amendments which he has introduced in his report are of key importance to the European Parliament.
The rapporteur has replicated some of what he sees as key parts of Regulation 168/2007 as amendments in this report.
The rapporteur has replicated some of what he sees as key parts of Regulation 168/2007 as amendments in this report.
He feels that it is worth clearly restating in the report on the MAF some of the basic elements of the FRA's mandate and the work that it will pursue.
He feels that it is worth clearly restating in the report on the MAF some of the basic elements of the FRA's mandate and the work that it will pursue.
Hence, a new recital 6a which replicates recital 13 of Regulation 168/2007.
Hence, a new recital 6a which replicates recital 13 of Regulation 168/2007.
Also, recital 7a which is a replica of recital 15 of Regulation 168/2007.
Also, recital 7a which is a replica of recital 15 of Regulation 168/2007.
By clearly stating these points again in this report, the rapporteur seeks to remind the institutions and the FRA itself of the flexibility and options open to the FRA over and above the thematic areas which are prescribed in article 2.
By clearly stating these points again in this report, the rapporteur seeks to remind the institutions and the FRA itself of the flexibility and options open to the FRA over and above the thematic areas which are prescribed in article 2.
This flexibility is essential if the FRA is going to be able to be pro-active as well as reactive towards sudden negative developments or degradation of human rights situations in certain sectors or geographical areas.
This flexibility is essential if the FRA is going to be able to be pro-active as well as reactive towards sudden negative developments or degradation of human rights situations in certain sectors or geographical areas.
The rapporteur's few amendments to the articles are submitted in the same spirit as the amendments to the recitals, namely to recall key aspects of the Regulation establishing the FRA.
The rapporteur's few amendments to the articles are submitted in the same spirit as the amendments to the recitals, namely to recall key aspects of the Regulation establishing the FRA.
In this way article 1 a (new) is a direct replication of article 4 of Regulation 168/2007.
In this way article 1 a (new) is a direct replication of article 4 of Regulation 168/2007.
The rapporteur believes it's essential in a report which looks at the FRA's MAF programme to recall the basic tasks of the Agency.
The rapporteur believes it's essential in a report which looks at the FRA's MAF programme to recall the basic tasks of the Agency.
Similarly, article 1b (new) is taken from article 5 paragraph 3 of Regulation 168/2007.
Similarly, article 1b (new) is taken from article 5 paragraph 3 of Regulation 168/2007.
Once again, this is a reminder to all that the FRA is able to undertake tasks over and above those highlighted in the thematic programme (article 2) at the request of the EU institutions.
Once again, this is a reminder to all that the FRA is able to undertake tasks over and above those highlighted in the thematic programme (article 2) at the request of the EU institutions.
The other proposed amendments to article 1 further develop this theme.
The other proposed amendments to article 1 further develop this theme.
The rapporteur seeks to counter balance the rigid nature of the thematic programme by allowing a more flexible approach under certain circumstances.
The rapporteur seeks to counter balance the rigid nature of the thematic programme by allowing a more flexible approach under certain circumstances.
Flexibility is key to allow the FRA to wholly fulfil its mandate.
Flexibility is key to allow the FRA to wholly fulfil its mandate.
Concerning article 2 (thematic areas) the rapporteur has been conscious of not making unrealistic demands on the FRA or the institutions.
Concerning article 2 (thematic areas) the rapporteur has been conscious of not making unrealistic demands on the FRA or the institutions.
It is for this reason (and despite many calls to extend the scope of article 2 by adding new areas of competence) that the rapporteur has chosen to make only one minor but important addition to this list.
It is for this reason (and despite many calls to extend the scope of article 2 by adding new areas of competence) that the rapporteur has chosen to make only one minor but important addition to this list.
Under point b) the rapporteur has added the notion of "multiple discrimination".
Under point b) the rapporteur has added the notion of "multiple discrimination".
With discrimination, sadly, once again on the increase in the EU, it is important that the FRA analyses and looks in detail at the notion of multiple discrimination.
With discrimination, sadly, once again on the increase in the EU, it is important that the FRA analyses and looks in detail at the notion of multiple discrimination.
People cannot easily be categorised into different groups of society (and arguably shouldn't be given the indivisible nature of fundamental rights for all citizens).
People cannot easily be categorised into different groups of society (and arguably shouldn't be given the indivisible nature of fundamental rights for all citizens).
Often, however, people find themselves discriminated against and are unsure as to the precise reason why.
Often, however, people find themselves discriminated against and are unsure as to the precise reason why.
It could be for one of several reasons or a combination of these reasons (e.g. discrimination against a Jewish woman because of her sex - female - or because of her religion - Jewish or both; or discrimination against a gay Kurdish man because of his ethnic origin - Kurdish - or his sexuality - homosexual or both).
It could be for one of several reasons or a combination of these reasons (e.g. discrimination against a Jewish woman because of her sex - female - or because of her religion - Jewish or both; or discrimination against a gay Kurdish man because of his ethnic origin - Kurdish - or his sexuality - homosexual or both).
The MAF should also cover this type of multiple discrimination in order to assess the extent of the problem and seek to find ways of tackling this complex form of discrimination.
The MAF should also cover this type of multiple discrimination in order to assess the extent of the problem and seek to find ways of tackling this complex form of discrimination.
It is also worth mentioning that the rapporteur and the LIBE committee held a hearing with NGOs working in the field of fundamental rights on 18th October 2007.
It is also worth mentioning that the rapporteur and the LIBE committee held a hearing with NGOs working in the field of fundamental rights on 18th October 2007.
The rapporteur wanted to listen to the views and opinions of civil society prior to producing his draft report.
The rapporteur wanted to listen to the views and opinions of civil society prior to producing his draft report.
The rapporteur notes that the meeting provided a diverse and exhaustive range of views.
The rapporteur notes that the meeting provided a diverse and exhaustive range of views.
Many critical voices were expressed concerning the scope of the thematic areas (article 2) and well as the general lack of ambition and coherence (no global vision or overarching framework) at EU level when it comes to having a co-ordinated, fit for purpose fundamental rights policy.
Many critical voices were expressed concerning the scope of the thematic areas (article 2) and well as the general lack of ambition and coherence (no global vision or overarching framework) at EU level when it comes to having a co-ordinated, fit for purpose fundamental rights policy.
The rapporteur and NGOs present mentioned the incoherence and illogic nature of having stringent rules of fundamental rights adherence for candidate countries (as part of the Copenhagen criteria) yet no real effective follow up/review mechanism post adhesion to the EU to ensure that Member States continue to implement and enforce human rights legislation and norms as should apply upon accession.
The rapporteur and NGOs present mentioned the incoherence and illogic nature of having stringent rules of fundamental rights adherence for candidate countries (as part of the Copenhagen criteria) yet no real effective follow up/review mechanism post adhesion to the EU to ensure that Member States continue to implement and enforce human rights legislation and norms as should apply upon accession.
All those who attended the meeting agreed, however, that the best way to serve the citizens when it comes to the defence of fundamental rights is to do all we can to facilitate agreement on the MAF and establish a fully operational FRA as soon as possible.
All those who attended the meeting agreed, however, that the best way to serve the citizens when it comes to the defence of fundamental rights is to do all we can to facilitate agreement on the MAF and establish a fully operational FRA as soon as possible.
The rapporteur welcomes the establishment of the FRA and urges all institutions and stakeholders to take the necessary steps to ensure a coherent and comprehensive MAF programme is established as soon as possible.
The rapporteur welcomes the establishment of the FRA and urges all institutions and stakeholders to take the necessary steps to ensure a coherent and comprehensive MAF programme is established as soon as possible.
In conjunction with the swift nomination of a Director for the Agency, the European Parliament hopes that, finally, the FRA will be able to undertake its important and necessary work in the field of fundamental rights in the EU in the very near future.
In conjunction with the swift nomination of a Director for the Agency, the European Parliament hopes that, finally, the FRA will be able to undertake its important and necessary work in the field of fundamental rights in the EU in the very near future.
The European Parliament is keen to play its part in both the drawing up of the MAF and the nomination of the Director.
The European Parliament is keen to play its part in both the drawing up of the MAF and the nomination of the Director.
The LIBE committee is planning to hold a hearing of the short listed candidates before the end of the year in order for the EP to have its say in the nomination of the candidate for this important job.
The LIBE committee is planning to hold a hearing of the short listed candidates before the end of the year in order for the EP to have its say in the nomination of the candidate for this important job.
Equally, the LIBE committee has undertaken a comprehensive review of all EP resolutions in the field of fundamental rights adopted by the Parliament.
Equally, the LIBE committee has undertaken a comprehensive review of all EP resolutions in the field of fundamental rights adopted by the Parliament.
The main aim of this is to ensure that the Parliament can effectively monitor and follow up with the FRA on areas of concern which have been raised by the EP in the past.
The main aim of this is to ensure that the Parliament can effectively monitor and follow up with the FRA on areas of concern which have been raised by the EP in the past.
It is hoped that the FRA will work constructively with the EP in this areas should the EP request that the FRA look into potential violations or breaches of fundamental rights based on its recently adopted resolutions.
It is hoped that the FRA will work constructively with the EP in this areas should the EP request that the FRA look into potential violations or breaches of fundamental rights based on its recently adopted resolutions.
относно предложението за решение на Съвета за прилагане на Регламент (ЕО) №168/2007 относно приемането на многогодишна рамка за Агенцията на Европейския съюз за основните права за периода 2007 – 2012 г.
on the proposal for a Council decision implementing Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 as regards the adoption of a Multiannual Framework for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for 2007-2012
Между институциите на ЕС, Европейският парламент е сред най-важните участници в насърчаването и защитата на основните и човешки права в Европейския съюз и извън него.
The European Parliament has been one of the most important EU institutional actors in the promotion and protection of fundamental and human rights within and outside the European Union.
Трябва да се предприемат незабавни стъпки за намиране на директор и Европейският парламент следва да бъде включен в този процес.
Steps should be taken immediately to provide a director and the European Parliament should be involved in that process.
Комисията по външни работи призовава Комисията да предприеме всички възможни мерки за поправяне на това положение.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Commission to take all appropriate measures in order to correct this situation.
Както се посочва в Регламент (ЕО) № 168/2007 на Съвета, приет на 15 февруари 2007 г., основната роля на Агенцията е да подпомага институциите на Съюза и държавите-членки, когато действат в рамките на правото на Общността, да спазват в своите политики задълженията си съгласно правото на ЕС и Общността за зачитане на основните права.
As stated in the Council Regulation adopted on 15 February 2007, (EC No 16872007) the primary role of the Agency is to assist the EU institutions and its Member States, when acting within the scope of Community law, to comply with their duty under EU and Community law to respect fundamental rights in their policies.
Тези основни права са отразени по-конкретно в Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз, като се имат предвид нейният статут и приложените разяснения.
These fundamental rights are reflected in particular in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, bearing in mind its status and the accompanying explanations.
Съгласно член 5 от Регламента, тематичните области на дейността на Агенцията се определят от Съвета чрез многогодишна рамка.
According to Article 5 of the Regulation, the thematic areas of activity of the Agency will be determined by the Council through a Multinational Programme.
Основните цели на докладчика по становище са следните:
The main objectives of the draftsperson are:
Позовава се на резолюцията относно насърчаване и защита на основните права и човешките права: ролята на националните и европейски институции, включително Агенцията за основните права и по-конкретно нейните предложения за разпространяване на принципите за защита на човешките права извън Съюза;
Refers to its resolution on promotion and protection of fundamental rights and human rights: the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency and in particular to its proposals on spreading the principles of the protection of human rights outside the Union;
Счита, че диалогът относно човешките права е от важно значение за отношенията на Съюза с трети страни; приветства факта, че в Агенцията могат да вземат участие страните-кандидатки; отново припомня, че пространство на стабилност, сигурност и благоденствие не може да бъде създадено без диалог със съседните страни относно човешките права и демокрацията и че различните институции трябва да си сътрудничат по-ефективно в тази сфера;
Takes the view that dialogue on human rights is of significant importance for the Union's relations with third countries; Welcomes the fact that the Agency is open to the participation of candidate countries; Reiterates that the area of stability, security and prosperity cannot be created without dialogue with neighbourhood countries on issues of human rights and democracy and that in that field different institutions should cooperate more effectively;