natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– като взе предвид искането за снемане на имунитета на Vural Öger, предадено от Прокуратурата към Брюкселския апелативен съд, на 11 май 2006 г. и оповестено на пленарното заседание на 6 юли 2006 г.,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Vural Öger, forwarded by the representative of the Public Prosecutor at the Brussels Court of Appeal on 11 May 2006, and announced in plenary sitting on 6 July 2006,
– като изслуша Vural Öger, съгласно член 7, параграф 3 от своя правилник,
– having heard Vural Öger in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид член 10 от Протокола за привилегиите и имунитетите на Европейските общности от 8 април 1965 г. и член 6, параграф 2 от Акта относно избора на членове на Европейския парламент чрез всеобщи преки избори от 20 септември 1976 г.,
– having regard to Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
Дело 101/63, Wagner/Fohrmann и Krier, Сборник от 1964 г., стр. 383 и дело 149/85, Wybot/Faure и други, Сборник от 1986 г., стр. 2391 ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964], ECR 195, and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– като взе предвид член 6, параграф 2 и член 7 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 6(2) and 7 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси (A6‑0000/2007),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0140/2006 ),
А. като има предвид, че Vural Öger е бил избран в Европейския парламент след шестите европейски избори, проведени между 10 и 13 юни 2004 г. и, че правомощията му са били проверени от Парламента на 14 декември 2004 г.,
A. whereas Vural Öger was elected to the European Parliament at the sixth European election held from 10 to 13 June 2004, and whereas his credentials were verified by Parliament on 14 December 2004,
Б. като има предвид, че на територията на държавите-членки, различни от неговата страна на произход, Vural Öger се ползва с освобождаване от всякаква мярка на задържане и всякакво съдебно преследване съгласно член 10 от Протокола за привилегиите и имунитетите на Европейските общности от 8 април 1965 г.,
B. whereas, by virtue of Article 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, Vural Öger is immune from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings on the territory of Member States other than the Member State of which he is a national,
Conformément à l'article 6, paragraphe 2, du Règlement, le Président a transmis cette demande à la commission des affaires juridiques.
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the President referred this request to the Committee on Legal Affairs.
La demande de levée de l'immunité a été adressée par le procureur général du Parquet près la Cour d'Appel de Bruxelles.
The request for waiver of immunity came from the public prosecutor of the Brussels Court of Appeal.
Öger sont exposées dans sa lettre adressée au président de la commission des affaires juridiques datée du 16 octobre 2006, laquelle a été communiquée aux membres de la commission des affaires juridiques.
Mr Öger’s comments are set out in his letter of 16 October 2006 to the chairman of the Committee on Legal Affairs, which has been forwarded to the members of the Committee on Legal Affairs.
La commission des affaires juridiques n'a pas encore reçu de réponse à cette demande.
The Committee on Legal Affairs has not yet received a reply to its request.
IMMUNITÉ PARLEMENTAIRE DES DÉPUTÉS DU Parlement europÉen : TEXTES ET PRINCIPES
PARLIAMENTARY IMMUNITY OF MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: TEXTS AND PRINCIPLES
L'article 10 du protocole sur les privilèges et immunités des Communautés européennes
Article 10 of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities
Voir également l'article 9 de ce protocole: "Les membres du Parlement européen ne peuvent être recherchés, détenus ou poursuivis en raison des opinions ou votes émis par eux dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions." , annexé au traité instituant un Conseil unique et une Commission unique des Communautés européennes
See also Article 9 of the Protocol: ‘Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties.’ , annexed to the Treaty establishing a Single Council and Single Commission of the European Communities
Mentionné à l'article 4, paragraphe 2, de l'Acte du 20 septembre 1976 portant élection de ses Membres au suffrage universel direct. , qui intègre les dispositions de l'article 9 de chacun des protocoles annexés aux traités instituant la CECA, la CEE et la CEEA, est ainsi rédigé:
Referred to at Article 4(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of Members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage , which contains the provisions of Article 9 of each of the protocols annexed to the Treaties establishing the ECSC, EEC and EAEC, states:
"Pendant la durée des sessions du Parlement européen, les membres de celui-ci bénéficient:
‘During the sessions of the European Parliament, its members shall enjoy:
a) sur leur territoire national, des immunités reconnues aux membres du parlement de leur pays;
(a) in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;
b) sur le territoire de tout autre État membre, de l'exemption de toute mesure de détention et de toute poursuite judiciaire.
(b) in the territory of any other Member State , immunity from any measure of detention and from legal proceedings.
L'immunité les couvre également lorsqu'ils se rendent au lieu de réunion du Parlement européen ou en reviennent.
Immunity shall likewise apply to members while they are travelling to and from the place of meeting of the European Parliament.
L'immunité ne peut être invoquée dans le cas de flagrant délit et ne peut non plus mettre obstacle au droit du Parlement européen de lever l'immunité de l'un de ses membres."
Immunity cannot be claimed when a member is found in the act of committing an offence and shall not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its members.’
L'immunité parlementaire n'est pas un privilège au bénéfice de l'un ou l'autre membre du Parlement, mais une garantie de l'indépendance du Parlement et de ses membres vis-à-vis d'autres institutions.
Parliamentary immunity is not a privilege granted to any particular Member of Parliament, but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament and its Members vis à vis other institutions.
Les décisions du Parlement ont forgé une notion cohérente d'immunité parlementaire européenne, qui est en principe autonome par rapport aux pratiques diverses des parlements nationaux.
Parliament's decisions have forged a coherent concept of European Parliamentary immunity, which in principle is autonomous in relation to the various practices of the national parliaments.
Cela permet d'éviter que les députés soient traités différemment selon leur nationalité.
This makes it possible to prevent Members being treated differently according to their nationality.
Par conséquent, même si l'immunité reconnue par le droit national est prise en considération, le Parlement européen applique ses propres principes, constants, pour décider s'il y a lieu ou non de lever l'immunité d'un de ses membres.
Consequently, although it takes the immunity recognised by the national law into consideration, Parliament applies its own, constant principles to decide whether or not to waive the immunity of one of its Members.
L'immunité parlementaire est destinée à protéger la liberté d'expression et la liberté de débat politique des députés.
Parliamentary immunity is intended to protect Members’ freedom of expression and freedom of political debate.
Dès lors, la commission compétente du Parlement européen a toujours retenu comme principe fondamental que, dans tous les cas où les actes reprochés à un député s'intègrent dans son activité politique ou sont directement liés à celle-ci, l'immunité ne peut être levée.
The relevant committee in the European Parliament has always held as a fundamental principle that, in all cases where the actions of which a Member is accused are an integral part of, or directly connected with, his political activity, immunity cannot be waived.
Ce principe est assorti d'autres considérations qui régissent la levée ou non de l'immunité, en particulier le «fumus persecutionis» , c'est-à-dire la présomption que l'action judiciaire est inspirée par l'intention de nuire à l'activité politique du député.
To this principle must be added other considerations governing the waiver or not of immunity, in particular fumus persecutionis, i.e. the presumption that the legal proceedings are intended to impede the Member's political activity.
La notion de «fumus persecutionis» signifie, en substance, que l'immunité n'est pas levée lorsqu’il existe un soupçon qu'à l'origine de l'action judiciaire se trouve l'intention de nuire à l'activité politique du député.
The concept of fumus persecutionis means in effect that immunity is not waived when there is a suspicion that the legal proceedings are motivated by a desire to impede the Member's political activity.
Ainsi, lorsque des poursuites sont engagées par un adversaire politique, sauf preuve du contraire, l'immunité n'est pas levée dans la mesure où il doit être considéré que les poursuites visent à nuire au député concerné et non pas à obtenir réparation d'un préjudice.
Thus, when a prosecution is initiated by a political adversary, without proof to the contrary, immunity is not waived if there is reason to believe that the prosecution aims to damage the Member concerned and not to obtain reparation for an injury.
De même, lorsque des poursuites sont engagées dans des circonstances qui laissent penser qu'elles ont uniquement pour but de nuire au député, l'immunité n'est pas levée.
Similarly, when a prosecution is initiated in circumstances which suggest that their sole aim is to damage the Member, immunity is not waived.
La procédure qui doit être suivie par le Parlement européen est prévue par les articles 6 et 7 du règlement.
The procedure that the European Parliament must follow is set out in Rules 6 and 7of its Rules of Procedure.
Les dispositions pertinentes de ces articles sont libellées en ces termes:
The relevant provisions of these rules are as follows.
«Article 6 Levée de l'immunité:
Rule 6, Waiver of immunity
Toute demande adressée au Président par une autorité compétente d'un État membre en vue de lever l'immunité d'un député est communiquée en séance plénière et renvoyée à la commission compétente.
Any request addressed to the President by a competent authority of a Member State that the immunity of a Member be waived shall be announced in Parliament and referred to the committee responsible.
La commission compétente examine sans délai et dans l'ordre dans lequel elles ont été présentées les demandes de levée de l'immunité ou de défense de l'immunité et des privilèges.
The committee responsible shall consider without delay and in the order in which they have been submitted requests for the waiver of immunity or requests for the defence of immunity and privileges.
La commission présente une proposition de décision qui se limite à recommander l'adoption ou le rejet de la demande de levée de l'immunité ou de défense de l'immunité et des privilèges.
The committee shall make a proposal for a decision which simply recommends the adoption or rejection of the request for the waiver of immunity or for the defence of immunity and privileges.
Lorsque la demande de levée de l'immunité porte sur plusieurs chefs d'accusation, chacun d'eux peut faire l'objet d'une décision distincte.
Where the request seeks the waiver of immunity on several counts, each of these may be the subject of a separate decision.
Le rapport de la commission peut, exceptionnellement, proposer que la levée de l'immunité concerne exclusivement la poursuite de l'action pénale, sans qu'aucune mesure d'arrestation, de détention ou toute autre mesure empêchant le député d'exercer les fonctions inhérentes à son mandat puisse être adoptée contre celui-ci, tant qu'un jugement définitif n'a pas été rendu.
The committee's report may, exceptionally, propose that the waiver of immunity shall apply solely to prosecution proceedings and that, until a final sentence is passed, the Member should be immune from any form of detention or remand or any other measure which prevents him from performing the duties proper to his mandate.
Il convient de noter que la levée de l'immunité ne porte atteinte en aucune manière à la présomption d'innocence.
It should be noted that waiver of immunity does not in any way affect the presumption of innocence.
L'article 9 du PPI n'est manifestement pas applicable à la présente affaire.
Article 9 of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities (PPI) clearly does not apply in this case.
L'immunité absolue n'est applicable qu'aux "opinions ou votes émis par [les membres] dans l'exercice de leurs fonctions".
Absolute immunity is only applicable to ‘opinions expressed or votes cast by (members) in the performance of their duties’.
Par conséquent, et visant à conserver l'intégrité du Parlement en tant qu'assemblée législative démocratique et à assurer l'indépendance du député concerné dans l'accomplissement de ses tâches, la commission des affaires juridiques a décidé de ne pas lever l'immunité de M.
Therefore, with a view to preserving Parliament’s integrity as a democratic legislative assembly and to safeguarding the independence of the Member concerned in the performance of his tasks, the Committee on Legal Affairs has decided not to waive Mr Öger’s immunity.
Искане за снемане на имунитета на Vural Öger
Request for waiver of the immunity of Vural Öger
Прокуратурата към Брюкселския апелативен съд (френски език) 11.5.2006 6.7.2006
Public Prosecutor at the Brussels Court of Appeal (French) 11.5.2006 6.7.2006
JURI 6.7.2006
JURI 6.7.2006
10 0 2
10 0 2
Carlo Casini, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis
Carlo Casini, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis
по предложението за регламент на Съвета, изменящ регламент № 1784/2003(ЕО) относно общата организация на пазара на зърнени храни
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals
PE 384.235v02-00
PE 384.235v02-00
за предложението за регламент на Съвета, изменящ регламент № 1784/2003 (ЕО) относно общата организация на пазара на зърнени храни
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0755 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0755 )
– като взе предвид член 37 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0044/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0044/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по земеделие и развитие на селските райони ( A6‑0041/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0141/2007 ),
Отхвърля предложението на Комисията;
Rejects the Commission proposal;
Призовава Комисията да оттегли своето предложение;
Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal;
In its proposal the Commission plans to abolish maize intervention from the 2007/08 marketing year onwards.
In its proposal the Commission plans to abolish maize intervention from the 2007/08 marketing year onwards.
The Commission's proposal is based on data from two marketing years (2004/05 and 2005/06).
The Commission's proposal is based on data from two marketing years (2004/05 and 2005/06).
During this period, the intervention stocks of maize in the EU25 amounted to 5,6 Mt, accounting for 40% of total intervention stock.
During this period, the intervention stocks of maize in the EU25 amounted to 5,6 Mt, accounting for 40% of total intervention stock.
The bulk of these stocks (93%) are located in Hungary.
The bulk of these stocks (93%) are located in Hungary.
The Commission expects the intervention stocks of maize to keep growing in the future because
The Commission expects the intervention stocks of maize to keep growing in the future because
· with the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, two major maize producers join the EU, with significantly lower internal prices than the intervention price and with a less-developed infrastructure;
· with the accession of Romania and Bulgaria, two major maize producers join the EU, with significantly lower internal prices than the intervention price and with a less-developed infrastructure;
· internal outlets are limited, due to high transport costs between the surplus and deficit areas of the EU;
· internal outlets are limited, due to high transport costs between the surplus and deficit areas of the EU;
· the liberalisation of trade increases international competition;
· the liberalisation of trade increases international competition;
The proposal is based on the assumption, therefore, that, by 2013, the intervention stocks of maize could amount to 15,6 Mt, while the total stocks of cereals could reach 18,9 Mt.
The proposal is based on the assumption, therefore, that, by 2013, the intervention stocks of maize could amount to 15,6 Mt, while the total stocks of cereals could reach 18,9 Mt.
In the event of the removal of maize from intervention, the Commission anticipates that the total stocks of cereals would amount to only 10 Mt that year.
In the event of the removal of maize from intervention, the Commission anticipates that the total stocks of cereals would amount to only 10 Mt that year.
Meanwhile, as the proposal suggests, the maize-producing Central European regions would regain their competitiveness and lower prices would also help to boost the competitiveness of the pig and poultry sector.
Meanwhile, as the proposal suggests, the maize-producing Central European regions would regain their competitiveness and lower prices would also help to boost the competitiveness of the pig and poultry sector.
The rapporteur proposes to reject the Commission's proposal on the following grounds:
The rapporteur proposes to reject the Commission's proposal on the following grounds:
· it infringes the legitimate expectations of maize producers;
· it infringes the legitimate expectations of maize producers;
· it is not justified appropriately by market data;
· it is not justified appropriately by market data;
· it fails to take into consideration the possible negative effects of the removal of maize from intervention on the cereal markets.
· it fails to take into consideration the possible negative effects of the removal of maize from intervention on the cereal markets.
Breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
Breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations
The protection of legitimate expectations is a fundamental aspect of legal certainty in Community law.
The protection of legitimate expectations is a fundamental aspect of legal certainty in Community law.
The basic concept behind legal certainty is that people ought to be able to plan their lives secure in the knowledge of the legal consequences of their action.
The basic concept behind legal certainty is that people ought to be able to plan their lives secure in the knowledge of the legal consequences of their action.
Firstly, it implies that no legal action should have a retroactive effect.
Firstly, it implies that no legal action should have a retroactive effect.
Secondly, legislators are obliged to provide a reasonable time for the citizens to prepare themselves for the application of the legal instrument in question, from the date of its publication.
Secondly, legislators are obliged to provide a reasonable time for the citizens to prepare themselves for the application of the legal instrument in question, from the date of its publication.
Maize is normally sown from April to the end of May, but producers have to take their most important decisions in autumn: crop structure has to be established, seeds, pesticides and herbicides have to be ordered.
Maize is normally sown from April to the end of May, but producers have to take their most important decisions in autumn: crop structure has to be established, seeds, pesticides and herbicides have to be ordered.
Since maize is the latest sown cereal, those areas, which have been set aside for maize, cannot be used for other purpose in the given marketing year.
Since maize is the latest sown cereal, those areas, which have been set aside for maize, cannot be used for other purpose in the given marketing year.
In view of the timetable of the Council and the European Parliament, the new regulation on the removal of maize intervention will be published no earlier than May this year.
In view of the timetable of the Council and the European Parliament, the new regulation on the removal of maize intervention will be published no earlier than May this year.
Since the Commission wants the current proposal to be applied from the 2007/08 marketing year, it would infringe the legitimate expectations of producers and other stakeholders.
Since the Commission wants the current proposal to be applied from the 2007/08 marketing year, it would infringe the legitimate expectations of producers and other stakeholders.
The Commission claims, however, that "maize sowing is carried out only in spring.
The Commission claims, however, that "maize sowing is carried out only in spring.
The timing of this proposal is therefore fully appropriate for farmers...".
The timing of this proposal is therefore fully appropriate for farmers...".
Considering the abovementioned facts, the rapporteur cannot accept this argument.
Considering the abovementioned facts, the rapporteur cannot accept this argument.
The Commission cannot defend itself with the argument, that the proposal was published last December.
The Commission cannot defend itself with the argument, that the proposal was published last December.
The publication of a proposal is only the first step in the legislative process and citizens are in no way legally bound by the mere publication of a proposal.
The publication of a proposal is only the first step in the legislative process and citizens are in no way legally bound by the mere publication of a proposal.
Had Community law attributed the same legal effects to the publication of a Commission's proposal as to that of an adopted legal instrument, it would have annulled the legislative power of the Council and the European Parliament!
Had Community law attributed the same legal effects to the publication of a Commission's proposal as to that of an adopted legal instrument, it would have annulled the legislative power of the Council and the European Parliament!
Taking the example of rye, which was excluded from the intervention system during the 2003 CAP reform, the legislator allowed one year for the producers to take the necessary decisions before the entry into force of the new regulation.
Taking the example of rye, which was excluded from the intervention system during the 2003 CAP reform, the legislator allowed one year for the producers to take the necessary decisions before the entry into force of the new regulation.