natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the end of this period will constitute a good moment to assess the new market situation, which will evolve over the coming years following the ongoing reform of the CMO for sugar.
Moreover, the end of this period will constitute a good moment to assess the new market situation, which will evolve over the coming years following the ongoing reform of the CMO for sugar.
Through its impact on the isoglucose production in the EU, this market organisation has a very significant effect on the starch market, and thus on the potato starch market.
Through its impact on the isoglucose production in the EU, this market organisation has a very significant effect on the starch market, and thus on the potato starch market.
Assessing the changed market situation after the sugar reform, will form a good base for a review of the current quota system.
Assessing the changed market situation after the sugar reform, will form a good base for a review of the current quota system.
Член 1, точка 1
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1
Член 2, параграф 1 (Регламент (ЕО) № 1868/94)
Article 2, paragraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 1868/94)
The potato-starch producing Member States shall be allocated quotas for the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years in accordance with the Annex.
The potato-starch producing Member States shall be allocated quotas for the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years in accordance with the Annex.
Държавите-членки, които са производителки на картофено нишесте, получават квоти за 2007/2008, 2008/2009 , 2009/2010 и 2010/2011 пазарни години в съответствие с Приложението.
The potato-starch producing Member States shall be allocated quotas for the 2007/2008 , 2008/2009 , 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 marketing years in accordance with the Annex.
Член 2, параграф 2, алинея първа (Регламент (ЕО) № 1868/94)
Article 2, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 (Regulation (EC) No 1868/94)
Each producer Member State referred to in the Annex shall allocate its quota among potato-starch manufacturers for use in the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years on the basis of the sub-quotas available to each manufacturer in 2006/2007, subject to application of the second subparagraph.
Each producer Member State referred to in the Annex shall allocate its quota among potato-starch manufacturers for use in the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 marketing years on the basis of the sub-quotas available to each manufacturer in 2006/2007, subject to application of the second subparagraph.
Всяка държава-членка, която е производителка, упомената в Приложението, разпределя своята квота между производителите на картофено нишесте за използване през 2007/2008, 2008/2009 , 2009/2010 и 2010/2011 пазарни години въз основа на подквотите, с които е разполагал всеки производител през 2006/2007, при прилагане на алинея втора.
Each producer Member State referred to in the Annex shall allocate its quota among potato-starch manufacturers for use in the 2007/2008 , 2008/2009 , 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 marketing years on the basis of the sub-quotas available to each manufacturer in 2006/2007, subject to application of the second subparagraph.
Член 3 (Регламент (ЕО) № 1868/94)
Article 3 (Regulation (EC) No 1868/94)
The Commission shall present the Council, before 1 January 2009 , with a report on the functioning of the quota system within the Community, accompanied by appropriate proposals.
The Commission shall present the Council, before 1 January 2009 , with a report on the functioning of the quota system within the Community, accompanied by appropriate proposals.
This report shall take account of developments on the potato starch and cereal starch markets.
This report shall take account of developments on the potato starch and cereal starch markets.
Преди 1 януари 2011 г. , Комисията представя на Съвета доклад за функционирането на квотната система в Общността, придружен от съответни предложения.
The Commission shall present the Council, before 1 January 2011 , with a report on the functioning of the quota system within the Community, accompanied by appropriate proposals.
Този доклад следва да отразява развитието на пазарите на картофено нишесте и нишесте от зърнени култури.
This report shall take account of developments on the potato starch and cereal starch markets.
Въпреки това, в случай че споразумение в рамките на СТО доведе до намаляване на възстановяванията при износ и понижаване на вносните мита за нишесте от тапиока, Комисията следва да представи на Европейския парламент и Съвета доклад за въздействието преди този срок.
However, should an agreement within the WTO lead to a reduction in export refunds and in the import duties for tapioca-starch, the Commission shall present the European Parliament and the Council with an impact report before that deadline.
Any major changes to the external arrangements resulting from an agreement within the WTO could have a substantial impact on the entire sector.
Any major changes to the external arrangements resulting from an agreement within the WTO could have a substantial impact on the entire sector.
Should this happen, the Commission would need to assess the new situation.
Should this happen, the Commission would need to assess the new situation.
The Agriculture and Fisheries Council and the Commission failed to take on board the position expressed by Parliament in its resolution of 11 May 2005, in which it held that the quota system should be rolled over for four years and that a balancing-out arrangement should be introduced for quotas not taken up, with preference being given to the new Member States.
The Agriculture and Fisheries Council and the Commission failed to take on board the position expressed by Parliament in its resolution of 11 May 2005, in which it held that the quota system should be rolled over for four years and that a balancing-out arrangement should be introduced for quotas not taken up, with preference being given to the new Member States.
At the Council meeting of 30 May 2005, the Commission said that it was willing to consider Polish and Lithuanian proposals for their potato-starch quotas to be reviewed in connection with future agreements following the two-year roll-over of the current quotas.
At the Council meeting of 30 May 2005, the Commission said that it was willing to consider Polish and Lithuanian proposals for their potato-starch quotas to be reviewed in connection with future agreements following the two-year roll-over of the current quotas.
For the fifth time since 1994, when the current production quota system has been introduced, the Commission propose to roll-over the system for only two years.
For the fifth time since 1994, when the current production quota system has been introduced, the Commission propose to roll-over the system for only two years.
For the rapporteur, the proposition has to be amended on two aspects: the period and the quantities.
For the rapporteur, the proposition has to be amended on two aspects: the period and the quantities.
The European potato starch production quota were always allocated for a three-years period, the only exception was made in 2004.
The European potato starch production quota were always allocated for a three-years period, the only exception was made in 2004.
At that time, the European Parliament proposed a four-years period but this amendment was rejected by the Commission with the result that the Commission has to present again a new prolongation of the system for two years!
At that time, the European Parliament proposed a four-years period but this amendment was rejected by the Commission with the result that the Commission has to present again a new prolongation of the system for two years!
Actually, a two-years period is very to short.
Actually, a two-years period is very to short.
The industry needs a better visibility to the framework in which it has to develop in the future.
The industry needs a better visibility to the framework in which it has to develop in the future.
This is also important for the farmers.
This is also important for the farmers.
They need to anticipate their supply commitments at least two years in advance.
They need to anticipate their supply commitments at least two years in advance.
The multiplication of sufficient seed potatoes takes at least two years.
The multiplication of sufficient seed potatoes takes at least two years.
Farmers have to grow seed potatoes this year to have enough material to comply with their anticipated supply commitments two years from now.
Farmers have to grow seed potatoes this year to have enough material to comply with their anticipated supply commitments two years from now.
This long term planning is even more important as starch potatoes are a crop, which cannot be stored like cereals crops.
This long term planning is even more important as starch potatoes are a crop, which cannot be stored like cereals crops.
Depending on seed potato growing decisions today, potato farmers make as well choices on their crop rotation in two or three years from now.
Depending on seed potato growing decisions today, potato farmers make as well choices on their crop rotation in two or three years from now.
The overall starch production quota under current regulations amounts to 1 948 761 tonnes, of which 1 762 148 tonnes are allocated to EU-15 states, and 186 613 tonnes to EU-10 states.
The overall starch production quota under current regulations amounts to 1 948 761 tonnes, of which 1 762 148 tonnes are allocated to EU-15 states, and 186 613 tonnes to EU-10 states.
That is to say, 90,4% of the total quota is allocated to the EU-15, with a bare 9,6% to EU-10 states.
That is to say, 90,4% of the total quota is allocated to the EU-15, with a bare 9,6% to EU-10 states.
This proportion doesn't correspond to the distribution of potato production: EU-15 - 70%, EU-10 - 30%.
This proportion doesn't correspond to the distribution of potato production: EU-15 - 70%, EU-10 - 30%.
In 2004, in order to take into account the effects of the accession of ten new Member States, the overall quota has been increase from 1 762 148 tonnes to 1 948 761 tonnes.
In 2004, in order to take into account the effects of the accession of ten new Member States, the overall quota has been increase from 1 762 148 tonnes to 1 948 761 tonnes.
That means that no reduction of quantities for the EU-15 has been operated after the enlargement.
That means that no reduction of quantities for the EU-15 has been operated after the enlargement.
Poland has the largest potato‑growing area in Europe, yet their allocation of production quotas does not even cover national demand (per capita consumption of starch and starch products in Poland rose from 4.5 kg in 1994 to 18.5 kg in 2006) with the result that Poland, the largest producer of potatoes in Europe, has become an importer of potato starch.
Poland has the largest potato‑growing area in Europe, yet their allocation of production quotas does not even cover national demand (per capita consumption of starch and starch products in Poland rose from 4.5 kg in 1994 to 18.5 kg in 2006) with the result that Poland, the largest producer of potatoes in Europe, has become an importer of potato starch.
On account of this, the trade deficit in starch and starch products is visibly growing, largely as a result of the restrictions placed on the production volume permitted under Community law.
On account of this, the trade deficit in starch and starch products is visibly growing, largely as a result of the restrictions placed on the production volume permitted under Community law.
This weak quota does not only restrict the possibility to satisfy the internal demand of potato starch but limits also the possibilities to develop the production of specific types of potato starch and then will loose in competitiveness versus other types of starch production.
This weak quota does not only restrict the possibility to satisfy the internal demand of potato starch but limits also the possibilities to develop the production of specific types of potato starch and then will loose in competitiveness versus other types of starch production.
Inside the total starch production, it can be clearly seen that potato starch, which is purer and of a higher quality, is being supplanted by cereal starch.
Inside the total starch production, it can be clearly seen that potato starch, which is purer and of a higher quality, is being supplanted by cereal starch.
Potatoes are losing out to rival starch raw materials such as maize, wheat and tapioca.
Potatoes are losing out to rival starch raw materials such as maize, wheat and tapioca.
As indicated in the report from the Commission:
As indicated in the report from the Commission:
'While potato starch production has been stable due to the quota limitation, total starch production in the Community (from wheat, maize and potatoes) has increased by approximately 4% per year on average since 1995/96.
'While potato starch production has been stable due to the quota limitation, total starch production in the Community (from wheat, maize and potatoes) has increased by approximately 4% per year on average since 1995/96.
This growth is mainly due to increases in wheat starch, while the share of potato starch in the total starch market has steadily decreased and now represents 20 % of the total starch production.'
This growth is mainly due to increases in wheat starch, while the share of potato starch in the total starch market has steadily decreased and now represents 20 % of the total starch production.'
An increased production of potato starch in Poland and in Lithuania would not directly compete with the ordinary bulk production but it would facilitate the development of starch industry in both countries and in consequence also the competitiveness of the Polish and Lithuanian producers.
An increased production of potato starch in Poland and in Lithuania would not directly compete with the ordinary bulk production but it would facilitate the development of starch industry in both countries and in consequence also the competitiveness of the Polish and Lithuanian producers.
It is very important for the economy of these two countries because as it has been mentioned by the Commission in his report: 'The structure of the industry differs between the Member States.
It is very important for the economy of these two countries because as it has been mentioned by the Commission in his report: 'The structure of the industry differs between the Member States.
Production is very concentrated in most of the old Member States (around 17 manufacturers share 1.8 million tonnes of quota) while in the new Member States manufacturers tend to be smaller (around 16 share 0.2 million tonnes of quota)'.
Production is very concentrated in most of the old Member States (around 17 manufacturers share 1.8 million tonnes of quota) while in the new Member States manufacturers tend to be smaller (around 16 share 0.2 million tonnes of quota)'.
That means:
That means:
Processing firms are very small and are situated in rural areas where they have a great impact on the local economy and on the development of those areas.
Processing firms are very small and are situated in rural areas where they have a great impact on the local economy and on the development of those areas.
Such firms are mainly to be found in regions suffering from structural unemployment.
Such firms are mainly to be found in regions suffering from structural unemployment.
An excessively low quota for Lithuania has resulted in the total discontinuation of production and a 36% rise in unemployment.
An excessively low quota for Lithuania has resulted in the total discontinuation of production and a 36% rise in unemployment.
In Poland, the lower production quota in force since the country's accession has automatically resulted in smaller contracts, and this has led to the elimination from the market of some growers (the overall number of growers has fallen from 20 000 to 7 000) who were forced to find outlets for raw materials coming under contracts concluded in the previous period.
In Poland, the lower production quota in force since the country's accession has automatically resulted in smaller contracts, and this has led to the elimination from the market of some growers (the overall number of growers has fallen from 20 000 to 7 000) who were forced to find outlets for raw materials coming under contracts concluded in the previous period.
Increasing the production quota would, on the other hand, provide the safety margin required in order to ensure that the quota is met in the event of, among other things, bad weather conditions such as those which occurred during the 2005/2006 marketing year.
Increasing the production quota would, on the other hand, provide the safety margin required in order to ensure that the quota is met in the event of, among other things, bad weather conditions such as those which occurred during the 2005/2006 marketing year.
To sum up, the starch production quota which the Commission is proposing fails to reflect the production capacity of Poland's processing plants (1 to 1.1 million tonnes of potatoes processed during the 100-day growing season), the raw materials available and the growing demand for starch and starch products.
To sum up, the starch production quota which the Commission is proposing fails to reflect the production capacity of Poland's processing plants (1 to 1.1 million tonnes of potatoes processed during the 100-day growing season), the raw materials available and the growing demand for starch and starch products.
There is no economic justification for cutting starch production by allocating lower production quotas.
There is no economic justification for cutting starch production by allocating lower production quotas.
The setting of low quotas for Poland and Lithuania will make production less profitable and impede the development of the potato starch sector.
The setting of low quotas for Poland and Lithuania will make production less profitable and impede the development of the potato starch sector.
Квотна система за производството на картофено нишесте
Quota system in relation to the production of potato starch
Vincenzo Aita, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Dumitru Gheorghe Mircea Coşea, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Duarte Freitas, Lutz Goepel, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Jeffrey Titford, Witold Tomczak, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
Vincenzo Aita, Peter Baco, Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Thijs Berman, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Dumitru Gheorghe Mircea Coşea, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Gintaras Didžiokas, Michl Ebner, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Duarte Freitas, Lutz Goepel, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Jeffrey Titford, Witold Tomczak, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
Herbert Bösch, Bernadette Bourzai, Béla Glattfelder, Gábor Harangozó, Astrid Lulling, Jan Mulder
Herbert Bösch, Bernadette Bourzai, Béla Glattfelder, Gábor Harangozó, Astrid Lulling, Jan Mulder
PE 386.395v02-00
PE 386.395v02-00
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛНА ПРОЕКТОРЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ.........5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................4
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................7
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................6
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...............9
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE LEGAL BASIS...............8
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2006)0777 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0777 )
– като взе предвид решението на Съвета относно подписването и временното прилагане на втория допълнителен протокол към Споразумението за икономическо партньорство, политическо координиране и сътрудничество между Европейската общност и нейните държави-членки, от една страна, и Съединените мексикански щати, от друга страна, който отчита присъединяването на Република България и Румъния към Европейския съюз(16522/2006),
– having regard to Council decision on the signature and provisional application of a Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United Mexican States, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union (16522/2006),
– като взе предвид член 57, параграф 2, член 71, член 80, параграф 2, член 133, параграф 5, и член 181, както и член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа, първо и второ изречение от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) and 181 in conjunction with the first subparagraph, first and second sentences of Article 300(2) of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО, съгласно която Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0077/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0077/2007 ),
– като взе предвид член 51, член 83, параграф 7 и член 35 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по международна търговия ( A6‑0138/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0138/2007 ),
като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, и по-специално член 57, параграф 2, член 71, член 80, параграф 2, член 133, параграфи 1 и 5 и член 181, заедно с член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа, първо и второ изречение и член 300, параграф 3, алинея първа от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) and 181 in conjunction with the first subparagraph, first and second sentences of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, и по-специално член 57, параграф 2, член 71, член 80, параграф 2, член 133, параграфи 1 и 5 и член 181, заедно с член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа, първо и второ изречение и член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 57(2), 71, 80(2), 133(1), 133(5) and 181 in conjunction with the first subparagraph, first and second sentences of Article 300(2) and the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) thereof,
This protocol of adaptation of a PCA, which requires the Parliament’s assent for its conclusion, should itself be referred to the Parliament under the assent procedure, within the meaning of Article 300 (3) EC, rather than under simple consultation .
T his protocol of adaptation of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, which requires the Parliament’s assent for its conclusion, should itself be referred to the Parliament under the assent procedure, within the meaning of Article 300(3) EC, rather than under simple consultation.
The content of the present Proposal consists in a sole article approving the conclusion of the Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement.
The content of the present Proposal consists in a sole article approving the conclusion of the Second Additional Protocol to the Economic Partnership, Political Coordination and Cooperation Agreement.