natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Jim Allister, Richard Corbett, Brian Crowley, Hanne Dahl, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Timothy Kirkhope, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Ashley Mote, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Johannes Voggenhuber, Dushana Zdravkova
Jim Allister, Richard Corbett, Brian Crowley, Hanne Dahl, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Timothy Kirkhope, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Ashley Mote, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Johannes Voggenhuber, Dushana Zdravkova
Philip Claeys, Glyn Ford, Sepp Kusstatscher, Michael Henry Nattrass, Renate Weber
Philip Claeys, Glyn Ford, Sepp Kusstatscher, Michael Henry Nattrass, Renate Weber
Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Neena Gill, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Carlo Casini, Bert Doorn, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Neena Gill, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Sharon Bowles, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Sajjad Karim, Georgios Papastamkos, Jacques Toubon
Sharon Bowles, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Sajjad Karim, Georgios Papastamkos, Jacques Toubon
PE 404.399v02-00
PE 404.399v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................10
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................10
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (16133/3/2007 – C6‑0129/2008 )
– having regard to the Council common position (16133/3/2007 – C6‑0129/2008 )
Приети текстове , 29.11.2007 г., P6_TA(2007)0557 . относно предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2006)0784 )
Texts adopted , 29.11.2007, P6_TA(2007)0557 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0784 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0223/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0223/2008 ),
(4a) С цел да се осигури съгласуваност със съществуващото законодателство в областта на железопътния транспорт, от обхвата на настоящата директива се изключват железници, които представляват културно-историческо наследство, както и музейни и туристически железници.
(4a) In order to ensure consistency with existing railway legislation, heritage, museum and tourist railways are exempt from this Directive.
Член 1 –точка -1 а (нова)
Article 1 – point -1 a (new)
Директива 2004/49/EО
Directive 2004/49/EC
Член 2 – параграф 2 – букви в а и в б (нови)
Article 2 – paragraph 2 - points c a and c b (new)
-1a) В член 2, параграф 2 се добавят следните букви:
(-1a) The following points shall be added to Article 2(2):
"ва) подвижен състав, представляващ културно-историческо наследство, който се движи по националните мрежи, ако съответства на националните правила и разпоредби за безопасност;
"(ca) heritage rolling stock that runs on national networks providing that it complies with national safety rules and regulations;
вб) железници, представляващи културно-историческо наследство, музейни и туристически железници, които използват собствени мрежи, включително работилници или подвижен състав, притежавани или използвани от подобни железници или персонал, нает от подобни железници."
(cb) heritage, museum and tourist railways that operate on their own network, including workshops or rolling stock that are owned by or based on such a railway or staff who are based on that railway."
In order to remain consistent with the Parliament's approved 1st reading position on the railway interoperability directive, it must be made clear that heritage and museum railways are exempt from this directive provided they comply with national safety rules or are operating on their own network.
In order to remain consistent with the Parliament's approved 1st reading position on the railway interoperability directive, it must be made clear that heritage and museum railways are exempt from this directive provided they comply with national safety rules or are operating on their own network.
Член 1 – точка 5 – буква a a (нова)
Article 1 – point 5 – point a a (new)
Член 7– параграф 3 – алинея 3 a (нова)
Article 7– paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
aa) в параграф 3 се добавя следната алинея:
(aa) in paragraph 3, the following subparagraph shall be added:
„Преди съставяне или преразглеждане на общи критерии за безопасност (ОКБ) трябва да се направи анализ на разходите и ползите, който да покаже, че очакваното въздействие от разработването на ОКБ ще подобри равнището на безопасност на транспорта и оптималното използване на железопътната система.”;
"Before drafting or revising CSTs, a cost-benefit analysis must demonstrate that the expected effects of the development of CSTs shall improve the level of transport safety and the optimum use of the railway system.";
The text restores the amendment 14 of Parliament's first reading regarding the development of the common safety targets (CSTs).
The text restores the amendment 14 of Parliament's first reading regarding the development of the common safety targets (CSTs).
Член 1 – точка 7
Article 1 – point 7
„Член 14
"Article 14
Поддръжка на превозните средства
Maintenance of vehicles
Преди да бъде въведено в експлоатация и използвано в мрежата, за всяко превозно средство се определя структура, която отговаря за неговата поддръжка, и тази структура се регистрира в Националния регистър на превозните средства съгласно член 33 от Директивата за оперативната съвместимост на железопътната система.
Before it is placed in service or used on the network, each vehicle shall have an entity in charge of maintenance assigned to it and this entity shall be registered in the NVR in accordance with Article 33 of the Railway Interoperability Directive.
За всяко превозно средство , преди да бъде въведено в експлоатация и използвано в мрежата, се определя структура, която отговаря за неговата поддръжка, и тази структура се регистрира в Националния регистър на превозните средства съгласно член 33 от Директивата за оперативната съвместимост на железопътната система.
Each vehicle, before it is placed in service or used on the network, shall have an entity in charge of maintenance assigned to it and this entity shall be registered in the NVR in accordance with Article 33 of the Railway Interoperability Directive.
Железопътно предприятие, оператор на инфраструктура или оператор, експлоатиращ превозни средства, може да изпълнява функцията на структура, която отговаря за поддръжката.
A railway undertaking, an infrastructure manager or a keeper may be an entity in charge of maintenance.
Съответните национални органи по безопасността могат, в изключителни случаи и в рамките на съответните им мрежи, да вземат решение за дерогации от задължението, предвидено в параграф 1.
The relevant National Safety Authorities may, in exceptional cases and restricted to their respective networks, decide on derogations from the obligation provided for in paragraph 1.
Всяка структура, която отговаря за поддръжката, се сертифицира в съответствие с параграф 6.
Each entity in charge of maintenance shall be certified pursuant to paragraph 6.
Без да се засяга задължението на железопътните предприятия и операторите на инфраструктура, предвидено в член 4, структурите, които отговарят за поддръжката, осигуряват, посредством система за поддръжка, безопасното експлоатационно състояние на превозните средства.
Without prejudice to the responsibility of the railway undertakings and infrastructure managers as provided for in Article 4, the entity in charge of maintenance shall ensure that vehicles are in a safe state of running by means of a system for maintenance.
Когато структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, е железопътно предприятие или оператор на инфраструктура, посочената в параграф 3 от настоящия член система се установява посредством системата за управление на безопасността, предвидена в член 9.
Where the entity in charge of maintenance is a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager the system referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article shall be established through the safety management system set out in Article 9.
Всяка структура, която отговаря за поддръжката, извършва поддръжката или сама, или посредством работилници за поддръжка въз основа на сключен договор.
The entity in charge of maintenance shall carry out the maintenance itself or make use of contracted maintenance workshops .
Ако структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, не е железопътно предприятие или оператор на инфраструктура, тя може да бъде сертифицирана съгласно параграф 6.
If the entity in charge of maintenance is not a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager it may be certified pursuant to paragraph 6.
Въз основа на препоръка от Агенцията, до....* Комисията приема мярка, уреждаща сертифицирането на структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, по отношение на нейната система за поддръжка.
Based on a recommendation by the Agency, the Commission shall, by ..*.  , adopt a measure establishing certification of the entity in charge of maintenance with regard to its maintenance system.
Тази мярка, предназначена да измени несъществени елементи от настоящата директива чрез допълването ѝ, се приема в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране с контрол, посочена в член 27, параграф 2а.
This measure, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive, by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 27(2a).
Мярката обхваща изискванията за сертифициране на структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, въз основа на одобрение на нейната система за поддръжка, формата и валидността на сертификата, и органа или органите, които отговарят за издаването му, както и механизмите за контрол, необходими за функционирането на системата за сертифициране.
The measure shall include the requirements for the certification of the entity in charge of maintenance based on the approval of its maintenance system, the format and validity of the certificate and the body or bodies responsible for issuing it, and the controls necessary for the functioning of the certification system.
Въз основа на препоръка от Агенцията, най-късно една година след влизането в сила на настоящата директива, Комисията приема мярка, установяваща задължително сертифициране на структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, по отношение на нейната система за поддръжка.
Based on a recommendation by the Agency, the Commission shall , at the latest one year after the entry into force of this Directive , adopt a measure establishing mandatory certification of the entity in charge of maintenance with regard to its maintenance system.
Мярката обхваща изискванията за сертифициране на структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, въз основа на одобрение на нейната система за поддръжка, формата и валидността на сертификата, и органа или органите, които отговарят за издаването му, както и механизмите за контрол, необходими за функционирането на системата за сертифициране.
The measure shall include the requirements for the certification of the entity in charge of maintenance based on the approval of its maintenance system , the format and validity of the certificate and the body or bodies responsible for issuing it, and the controls necessary for the functioning of the certification system.
Сертификатите, издадени съгласно параграф 6 от настоящия член, потвърждават спазването на изискванията, посочени в параграф 3 от настоящия член, и са валидни навсякъде в Общността.
The certificates granted in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article shall confirm compliance with the requirements referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article and shall be valid throughout the Community.
Ако структурата, която отговаря за поддръжката, не е сертифицирана, железопътното предприятие или операторът на инфраструктура следят за адекватното прилагане на всички необходими процедури за поддръжка посредством своите системи за управление за безопасността, предвидени в член 9.";
If the entity in charge of maintenance is not certified, a railway undertaking or an infrastructure manager shall ensure, through its safety management system set out in Article 9, that all relevant maintenance procedures are adequately applied.";
Сертификатите, издадени съгласно параграф 6 от настоящия член, потвърждават спазването на изискванията, посочени в параграфи 3 и 4 от настоящия член, и са валидни навсякъде в Общността.
The certificates granted in accordance with paragraph 6 of this Article shall confirm compliance with the requirements referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Article and shall be valid throughout the Community.
Агенцията прави оценка на процедурата на задължително сертифициране по параграф 6, като представя доклад на Комисията най-късно три години след влизането в сила на съответната мярка.
The Agency shall evaluate the mandatory certification process implemented pursuant to paragraph 6 by submitting a report to the Commission, no later than three years after the entry into force of the relevant measure.
Когато въз основа на доклада на Агенцията и след провеждане на консултации със заинтересованите страни стане ясно, че са необходими подобрения, Комисията може да направи съответни законодателни предложения.”;
Where it appears, on the basis of the report of the Agency and after consulting stakeholders that improvements are necessary, the Commission may bring forward appropriate legislative proposals.";
* Една година влизането в сила на настоящата директива .
* One year after the entry into force of this Directive.
The text restores the amendment 21 of Parliament's first reading, i.e. mandatory maintenance certification system, while at the same time takes into account new elements and wording of Council's Common position.
The text restores the amendment 21 of Parliament's first reading, i.e. mandatory maintenance certification system, while at the same time takes into account new elements and wording of Council's Common position.
On 13 December 2006 the Commission submitted to Parliament and the Council a proposal for the revision of Directive 2004/49/EC on safety on the Community’s railways (Railway Safety Directive)
On 13 December 2006 the Commission submitted to Parliament and the Council a proposal for the revision of Directive 2004/49/EC on safety on the Community’s railways (Railway Safety Directive)
1 COM(2006)0784 1 .
1 COM(2006)0784 1 .
The proposal was presented by the Commission together with other two legislatives proposals, i.e., the new Interoperability directive and the revision of the Regulation (EC) N° 881/2004 establishing a European Railway Agency.
The proposal was presented by the Commission together with other two legislatives proposals, i.e., the new Interoperability directive and the revision of the Regulation (EC) N° 881/2004 establishing a European Railway Agency.
The three proposals submitted under codecision procedure together with the Communication aiming at the facilitation of the free movement of locomotives across the EU, was considered as being part of the Commission's package on cross acceptance of the rolling stock.
The three proposals submitted under codecision procedure together with the Communication aiming at the facilitation of the free movement of locomotives across the EU, was considered as being part of the Commission's package on cross acceptance of the rolling stock.
On 29 of December 2007 the European Parliament issued an Opinion at first reading as part of the co-decision procedure and adopted a report in which it proposed 27 amendments to the Commission text
On 29 of December 2007 the European Parliament issued an Opinion at first reading as part of the co-decision procedure and adopted a report in which it proposed 27 amendments to the Commission text
Report of Mr Costa , A6-0346/2007 , P6_TA(2007)0557 .
Report of Mr Costa , A6-0346/2007 , P6_TA(2007)0557 .
The Council’s common position incorporates fully or in part or in principal several Parliament’s amendments which were adopted at first reading and cover mainly:
The Council’s common position incorporates fully or in part or in principal several Parliament’s amendments which were adopted at first reading and cover mainly:
- texts related to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) and to the correlation table of the transpositions measures (amendments 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 23);
- texts related to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny (RPS) and to the correlation table of the transpositions measures (amendments 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, and 23);
- the transfer of the content of Articles 14 and 14a and the annex related with the provisions on the authorisation of placing in service of vehicles to the new interoperability directive (amendments 18, 20, 26 and 27);
- the transfer of the content of Articles 14 and 14a and the annex related with the provisions on the authorisation of placing in service of vehicles to the new interoperability directive (amendments 18, 20, 26 and 27);
- Provisions related to the definition of the National Vehicle Register and the Keepers (amendments 8 and 9);
- Provisions related to the definition of the National Vehicle Register and the Keepers (amendments 8 and 9);
While the issue of transferring the provisions on authorisations of placing in service of vehicles to the new interoperability directive was successfully solved between the tree institutions, the same cannot be said for the provisions related to the maintenance certification system.
While the issue of transferring the provisions on authorisations of placing in service of vehicles to the new interoperability directive was successfully solved between the tree institutions, the same cannot be said for the provisions related to the maintenance certification system.
The Parliament amendment calls for a mandatory system, while Council’s text foresees a voluntary system.
The Parliament amendment calls for a mandatory system, while Council’s text foresees a voluntary system.
Further, other amendments which are not incorporated in the Common position are the use of the urgency procedure under the new PRS, the definitions on national safety rules and on essential requirements (amendments 5 and 7), the introduction of cost benefit analysis for the development of Common safety targets (amendment 14) the possibility to request a technical opinion of the Agency in case of negative decision from the national safety authorities (amendment 22).
Further, other amendments which are not incorporated in the Common position are the use of the urgency procedure under the new PRS, the definitions on national safety rules and on essential requirements (amendments 5 and 7), the introduction of cost benefit analysis for the development of Common safety targets (amendment 14) the possibility to request a technical opinion of the Agency in case of negative decision from the national safety authorities (amendment 22).
It should be noted that Council’s text replaces in several parts the Commission’s text with a new text.
It should be noted that Council’s text replaces in several parts the Commission’s text with a new text.
This mainly concerns the introduction of a new concept of the entity in charge of maintenance to this directive.
This mainly concerns the introduction of a new concept of the entity in charge of maintenance to this directive.
Since the Council’s common position does not incorporate Parliament’s amendments and mainly the amendment on the mandatory maintenance certification system, it is proposed to restore the Parliament’s position of first reading while taking into account the Council’s text.
Since the Council’s common position does not incorporate Parliament’s amendments and mainly the amendment on the mandatory maintenance certification system, it is proposed to restore the Parliament’s position of first reading while taking into account the Council’s text.
A mandatory maintenance certification system for all actors in the market, e.g. railway undertakings, infrastructure managers, keepers or any other entity which can be certified as an entity in charge of maintenance according to criteria and requirements set out in this directive, will create a level playing filed in the EU.
A mandatory maintenance certification system for all actors in the market, e.g. railway undertakings, infrastructure managers, keepers or any other entity which can be certified as an entity in charge of maintenance according to criteria and requirements set out in this directive, will create a level playing filed in the EU.
This will ensure a uniform application of the maintenance and safety management system across Europe without discriminations while at the same time it will enhance safety on the Community’s railways.
This will ensure a uniform application of the maintenance and safety management system across Europe without discriminations while at the same time it will enhance safety on the Community’s railways.
Изменение на Директива 2004/49/ЕО относно безопасността на железопътния транспорт в Общността
Amendment of Directive 2004/49/EC on safety on the Community’s railways
29.11.2007 T6-0557/2007
29.11.2007 T6-0557/2007
PE 402.874v01-00
PE 402.874v02-00
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ: ВЪПРОСНИК, ИЗПРАТЕН ДО НАЦИОНАЛНИТЕ СЪДИИ.................12
ANNEX: QUESTIONNAIRE SENT TO NATIONAL JUDGES..............................................11
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНОТО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ...................................69
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................58
– като взе предвид член 61 от Договора за ЕО, който предвижда постепенното създаване на пространство на свобода, сигурност и правосъдие, включително мерки в областта на съдебното сътрудничество по гражданскоправни и наказателноправни въпроси,
– having regard to Article 61 of the EC Treaty, which provides for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice including measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters,
– като взе предвид Програмата от Хага за укрепване на свободата, сигурността и правосъдието в Европейския съюз
– having regard to the Hague Programme for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union
– като взе предвид призива, отправен на 14 и 15 декември 2001 г. от Европейския съвет в Лаакен, за европейска мрежа за насърчаване на бързото организиране на обучение за магистрати, с оглед подпомагане на развитието на доверие между участниците в съдебно сътрудничество,
– having regard to the call, made on 14-15 December 2001 by the Laeken European Council, for a European network to encourage the rapid setting-up of training for the judiciary, with a view to helping to develop trust between those involved in judicial cooperation,
– като взе предвид своите резолюции от 10 септември 1991 г. относно учредяването на Академия по европейско право за Европейската общност
– having regard to its resolutions of 10 September 1991 on the founding of an Academy of European Law for the European Community
– като взе предвид съобщенията на Комисията от 29 юни 2006 г. относно съдебното обучение в Европейския съюз ( COM(2006)0356 ), от 5 септември 2007 г. относно Европа на резултатите – прилагане на правото на Общността ( COM(2007)0502 ), и от 4 февруари 2008 г. относно създаването на форум за обсъждане на политиките и практиката на ЕС в сферата на правосъдието ( COM(2008)0038 ),
– having regard to the Commission's communications of 29 June 2006 on judicial training in the European Union ( COM(2006)0356 ) , of 5 September 2007 on a Europe of results: applying Community law ( COM(2007)0502 ) , and of 4 February 2008 on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice ( COM(2008)0038 ),