natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the European Judicial Network has proved to be functioning very well in recent years and therefore additional rules should only be laid down where necessary.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the European Judicial Network has proved to be functioning very well in recent years and therefore additional rules should only be laid down where necessary.
The strength of the EJN, its flexible decentralised structure should not be touched.
The strength of the EJN, its flexible decentralised structure should not be touched.
Consequently many amendments proposed aim at codifying what is mainly exercised in practice already (provisions on national correspondents and their tasks, national information contact points and their tasks, venue and purpose of meetings of the Network, etc.).
Consequently many amendments proposed aim at codifying what is mainly exercised in practice already (provisions on national correspondents and their tasks, national information contact points and their tasks, venue and purpose of meetings of the Network, etc.).
Innovations are introduced with a view to secure telecommunication.
Innovations are introduced with a view to secure telecommunication.
Since - sensitive - personal data is exchanged it is essential to have a system in place that allows for using secure telecommunication connections to securely transmit data from one Member State to another one.
Since - sensitive - personal data is exchanged it is essential to have a system in place that allows for using secure telecommunication connections to securely transmit data from one Member State to another one.
It should also be considered to provide all competent authorities having responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation (not only the contact points) with access to secure telecommunication since these authorities can as well directly contact the competent authorities in another Member State and transmit requests for legal assistance (e.g. sending a European Arrest Warrant, including fingerprints).
It should also be considered to provide all competent authorities having responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation (not only the contact points) with access to secure telecommunication since these authorities can as well directly contact the competent authorities in another Member State and transmit request s for legal assistance (e.g. sending a European Arrest Warrant, including fingerprints).
Your rapporteur also thinks that a reference should be made to data protection rules that apply when the competent authorities and the contact points exchange personal data: the ‘future’ Council Framework Decision on the Protection of Personal Data Processed in the Framework of Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, the Council of Europe Convention 108, its Additional Protocol of 8 November 2001 and Recommendation No R (87) 15 of 17 September 1987 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to the Member States regulating the use of personal data in the police sector, also where data is not processed automatically.
Your rapporteur also thinks that a reference should be made to data protection rules that apply when the competent authorities and the contact points exchange personal data: the ‘future’ Council Framework Decision on the Protection of Personal Data Processed in the Framework of Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, the Council of Europe Convention 108, its Additional Protocol of 8 November 2001 and Recommendation No R (87) 15 of 17 September 1987 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to the Member States regulating the use of personal data in the police sector, also where data is not processed automatically.
Since the former is not yet in force and the latter rules are not European Union law it seems appropriate to insert an article on data protection in this Decision regarding basic protection rules (purpose limitation, physical security of data) and additional safeguards when exchanging specific – sensitive - categories of data (such as data relating to offences or criminal convictions).
Since the former is not yet in force and the latter rules are not European Union law it seems appropriate to insert an article on data protection in this Decision regarding basic protection rules (purpose limitation, physical security of data) and additional safeguards when exchanging specific – sensitive - categories of data (such as data relating to offences or criminal convictions).
This also applies to the EJN contact points.
This also applies to the EJN contact points.
This also applies to Eurojust when having a case that could be better dealt with by EJN.
This also applies to Eurojust when having a case that could be better dealt with by EJN.
With a view to reporting on the activities and the management of the Network, such a report should be drawn up by the EJN, since the Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
With a view to reporting on the activities and the management of the Network, such a report should be drawn up by the EJN, since the Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
This report also has to be submitted to the Parliament so that is can fulfil its role and tasks assigned by the Treaties.
This report also has to be submitted to the Parliament so that is can fulfil its role and tasks assigned by the Treaties.
Another important amendment concerns the nomination of contact points.
Another important amendment concerns the nomination of contact points.
The functioning of the Network depends to a great deal on the functioning of the contact points.
The functioning of the Network depends to a great deal on the functioning of the contact points.
Therefore it is essential that the contact points meet certain criteria, which are laid down in the Guidelines for the selection of contact points of the EJN, in order to be able to fulfil their tasks properly.
Therefore it is essential that the contact points meet certain criteria, which are laid down in the Guidelines for the selection of contact points of the EJN, in order to be able to fulfil their tasks properly.
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Vladimir Urutchev, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Vladimir Urutchev, Manfred Weber, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Evelyne Gebhardt, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Nicolae Vlad Popa
Edit Bauer, Evelyne Gebhardt, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Nicolae Vlad Popa
относно инициативата на Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република , Италианската република , Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция с оглед на приемане на решение на Съвета за укрепване на Евроюст и за изменение на Решение 2002/187/ПВР
on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA
PE 404.490v02-00
PE 404.490v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................40
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................39
относно инициативата Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република, Италианската република , Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република, и Кралство Швеция с оглед на приемане на решение на Съвета за укрепване на Евроюст и за изменение на Решение 2002/187/ПВР
on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA
– като взе предвид инициативата на Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република , Италианската република , Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция (5613/2008),
– having regard to the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden (5613/2008),
– като взе предвид член 34, параграф 2, буква б) от Договора за ЕС,
– having regard to Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 39, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕС, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0076/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0076/2008 ),
1. одобрява инициативата на Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република, Италианската република, Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция във вида, в който е изменена,
Approves the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden as amended;
7. възлага на своя председател да предаде позицията на Парламента съответно на Съвета и на Комисията, както и на правителствата на Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република, Италианската република, Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden.
Инициатива на Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република, Италианската република, Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция – акт за изменение
Initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden – amending act
Текст, предложен от Кралство Белгия, Чешката република, Република Естония, Кралство Испания, Френската република, Италианската република, Великото херцогство Люксембург, Кралство Нидерландия, Република Австрия, Република Полша, Португалската република, Република Словения, Словашката република и Кралство Швеция
Text proposed by the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden
(5а) С оглед на член 86 от Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз е необходимо да се изготви Зелена книга относно учредяването на Европейската прокуратура.
(5a) In the light of Article 86 of the Treaty on the F unctioning of the European Union , it is necessary to draw up a Green Paper on the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor 's Office .
(5б) Необходимо е да се вземат предвид правата на обвиняемите и жертвите при определяне на това в коя държава-членка условията са най-благоприятни за наказателно преследване или за предприемане на други правоприлагащи мерки.
(5b) The rights of the defendant s and victims need to be taken into account in determining which Member State is best placed to prosecute or take other law enforcement action.
(8г) Наличието на подходящи процесуални гаранции, включително по време на разследванията, са необходима предпоставка за взаимното признаване на съдебните решения по наказателноправни въпроси.
(8d) Adequate procedural safeguards, including during the investigations, are a necessary condition for the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters.
В частност, приемането възможно най-бързо на рамково решение относно процесуалните права с цел установяване на определени минимални правила във връзка с достъпа до правна помощ на физическите лица в държавите-членки.
In particular, the adoption of a framework decision on procedural rights as soon as possible in order to lay down certain minimum rules on the availability of legal assistance to individuals in the Member States.
(8б) Необходимо е също така Съветът да приеме възможно най-бързо рамково решение относно защитата на личните данни, обработвани в рамките на полицейското и съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси, като се осигури подходящо ниво на защита на данните.
(8b) It is also necessary for the Council to adopt as soon as possible a framework decision on the protection of personal data processed within the framework of p o lice and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, providing for an adequate level of data protection.
В своите национални законодателства държавите-членки трябва да гарантират равнище на защита на личните данни, което е равно най-малко на равнището, осигурено в Конвенцията на Съвета на Европа за защита на лицата по отношение на автоматичната обработка на лични данни от 28 януари 1981 г. и допълнителния протокол към нея от 8 ноември 2001 г., като при това вземат предвид Препоръка R (87) 15 от 17 септември 1987 г. на Комитета на министрите на Съвета на Европа към държавите-членки относно използването на лични данни в полицейския сектор, както и да гарантират защитата на данни, които не се обработват автоматично.
The Member States must ensure a level of protection of personal data in their national law at least equal to that provided under the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of 28 January 1981 and its Additional Protocol of 8 November 2001 and, in so doing, shall take account of Recommendation No R (87) 15 of 17 September 1987 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to the Member States regulating the use of personal data in the police sector, as well as ensure the protection of data which are not processed automatically.
(8а) От значение е да се гарантира подходяща защита на личните данни при всички видове системи за регистрация на лични данни, които се използват от Евроюст.
(8a) It is important to ensure appropriate protection of personal data for all types of personal data filing systems used by Eurojust.
В това отношение процедурният правилник за обработване и защита на личните данни в Евроюст 1 следва също да се прилага към структурираните ръчни папки, тоест към досиетата по отделните случаи, които се създават ръчно от националните членове или техни помощници и които са организирани по логичен начин.
In this respect, the Rules of P rocedure on the processing and protection of personal data at Eurojust 1 should also apply to structured manual files, that is to say, to case-related files that are compiled manually by national members or assistants and are organised in a logical way.
In order to ensure appropriate level of data protection not only for automated files but also for manually collected ones, it is important to clarify the meaning of structured manual files.
In order to ensure appropriate level of data protection not only for automated files but also for manually collected ones, it is important to clarify the meaning of structured manual files.
(8б) При обработване на данни от електронна поща, в съответствие с член 14, параграф 1, Евроюст следва да гарантира, че не разкрива съдържанието или заглавията на електронните писма.
(8 b) When processing e-mail traffic related data in accordance with Article 14(1), Eurojust should ensure that the content and titles of e-mails are not disclosed.
It is not acceptable to process content of e-mails or titles of e-mails (which refer to content of e-mails).
It is not acceptable to process content of e-mails or titles of e-mails (which refer to content of e-mails).
(8д) Лицата, които са били предмет на наказателно разследване по искане на Евроюст, но срещу тях не е било предявено обвинение, следва да бъдат осведомени за това разследване не по-късно от една година след като е взето решението срещу тях да не се предявява обвинение.
(8e) Persons who have been the subject of a criminal investigation based on a Eurojust request but have not been prosecuted should be informed about that investigation no later than one year after the decision not to prosecute has been taken.
(8г) Държавите-членки предоставят средства за правна защита в случаи, в които по искане на Евроюст е проведено разследване при очевидна липса на достатъчни основания.
(8d) The Member States shall provide a judicial remedy whe re the investigation was carried out at the request of Eurojust on the basis of manifestly insufficient grounds.
Решение 2002/187/ПВР
Decision 2002/187/JHA
Член 5а – параграф 1
Article 5a – paragraph 1
С цел изпълнение на задачите си при спешни ситуации Евроюст създава „звено за спешна координация“ (ЗСК).
In order to fulfil its tasks on an emergency basis, Eurojust shall set up an "Emergency Coordination Cell" (ECC).
С цел изпълнение на задачите си при спешни ситуации Евроюст създава „звено за спешна координация“ (ЗСК) , контактът с което може да се осъществи посредством единствена точка за контакт .
In order to fulfil its tasks on an emergency basis, Eurojust shall set up an "Emergency Coordination Cell" (ECC) , which shall be contactable via a single contact point .
Член 5а – параграф 2
Article 5a – paragraph 2
ЗСК се състои от един представител от всяка държава-членка, като това може да е националният член или негов заместник или помощник, които имат право да заместват националния член.
The ECC shall be composed of one representative per Member State, who may be either the national member, his or her deputy, or an assistant entitled to replace the national member.
ЗСК поддържа възможност за контакти и за действие денонощно .
The ECC shall be contactable and able to act on an around the clock basis.
Представителят поддържа възможност за действие 24 часа на ден и 7 дни в седмицата.
The representative shall be able to act on a 24 hours/7 days basis.
Член 5а – параграф 3
Article 5a – paragraph 3
Когато при спешни случаи дадено искане за съдебно сътрудничество трябва да бъде изпълнено в няколко държави-членки, компетентният орган може да го изпрати на ЗСК чрез представителя на своята държава-членка в ЗСК.
When in urgent cases a request for judicial cooperation needs to be executed in several Member States, the competent authority may forward it to the ECC through the representative of its Member State in the ECC.
Представителят на съответната държава-членка в ЗСК изпраща искането на компетентните органи на съответните държави-членки за изпълнение.
The representative of the Member State concerned in the ECC shall transmit the request to the competent authorities of the relevant Member States for execution.
Когато няма определен компетентен национален орган или при невъзможност своевременно да се определи такъв , членът на ЗСК има правомощие сам да изпълни искането.
Where no competent national authority has been identified or it is not possible to identify it in a timely manner, the member of the ECC shall have the power to execute the request himself.
При невъзможност своевременно да се определи компетентен национален орган , членът на ЗСК има правомощие сам да изпълни искането.
Where is not possible to identify a competent national authority in a timely manner, the member of the ECC shall have the power to execute the request himself.
В такъв случай, съответният член на ЗСК незабавно уведомява колегиалния орган в писмен вид относно предприетите мерки и относно причините, поради които не е бил своевременно определен компетентен национален орган.
In such a case, the ECC member concerned shall inform the College in writing without delay of the steps taken and the reasons for the failure to identify a competent national authority in a timely manner.
Член 6 – параграф 1 – буква а) – подточка vi)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – subpoint vi
vi) да предприемат специални мерки за целите на разследването;
(vi) take special investigative measures;
Unless it is clearly and in a limitative manner what are those “special investigative measures” the wording of point (vi) is too vague and may allow abusive interpretation.
Unless it is clearly and in a limitative manner what are those “special investigative measures” the wording of point (vi) is too vague and may allow abusive interpretation.
In principle, all legal investigative methods are provided for by point (i).
In principle, all legal investigative methods are provided for by point (i).
Член 6 – параграф 1 – буква а) – подточка vii)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – subpoint vii
vii) да предприемат всякакви други мерки, които са основателни с оглед на разследването или преследването;
(vii) take any other measure justified for the investigation or prosecution;
It is not clear what “other measure justified for investigation” can be beyond those provided for by point (i).
It is not clear what “other measure justified for investigation” can be beyond those provided for by point (i).
The wording of point (vii) is too vague and easily to be abused when implemented.
The wording of point (vii) is too vague and easily to be abused when implemented.