natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Те могат да се отклоняват от Регламент (ЕО, Евратом) № 1605/2002 съобразно специфичните оперативни потребности на Съвместното предприятие ГКВ, като е необходимо предварителното съгласие на Комисията.
It may depart from Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 where the specific operating needs of the FCH Joint Undertaking so require, subject to prior consent of the Commission.
Финансовите правила, приложими за съвместното предприятие ГКВ, не могат да се отклоняват от предвиденото в Регламент (ЕО, Евратом) № 2343/2002, освен ако това се налага конкретно от неговите оперативни потребности.
The financial rules applicable to the FCH Joint Undertaking may not depart from Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002, unless necessary for its specific operating needs.
В рамките на два месеца след приключването на всяка финансова година предварителните счетоводни отчети на СП се представят на Сметната палата на Европейските общности („Сметната палата“).
Within two months after the end of each financial year the provisional accounts of the Joint Undertaking shall be submitted to the Commission and the Court of Auditors of the European Communities (‘the Court of Auditors’).
Годишните финансови отчети на Съвместното предприятие трябва да бъдат подготвени и проверени при съблюдаване на счетоводните правила на ЕО, приети от счетоводителя на Комисията.
The Joint Undertaking's annual accounts have to be prepared and audited following the EC Accounting Rules as adopted by the Commission's Accounting Officer.
Освобождаване от отговорност за изпълнението на бюджета се прави от Европейския парламент, по препоръка на Съвета, в съответствие с предвидена във Финансовия регламент на Съвместното предприятие ГКВ процедура.
Discharge for the implementation of the budget shall be given by the European Parliament, upon recommendation of the Council, in accordance with a procedure provided for by the Financial Regulation of the FCH Joint Undertaking.
Освобождаването от отговорност за изпълнението на бюджета на съвместното предприятие ГКВ се извършва от Европейския парламент, като се вземе под внимание препоръката на Съвета, в съответствие с предвидена във финансовия правилник на съвместното предприятие ГКВ процедура.
Discharge for the implementation of the budget of the FCH Joint Undertaking shall be given by the European Parliament, taking into account a recommendation from the Council, in accordance with a procedure that shall be provided for by the financial rules of the FCH Joint Undertaking.
Човешките ресурси се определят в щатното разписание, което се представя в годишния бюджет и се предава от Комисията на Европейския парламент и на Съвета заедно с предварителния проектобюджет на Европейския съюз.
The staff resources shall be determined in the establishment plan to be set out in the annual budget and to be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council together with the preliminary draft budget of the European Union.
Създаване на съвместно предприятие “Горивни клетки и водород”
Regulation setting up the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Joint Undertaking
относно предложението за решение на Съвета за упълномощаване на Португалия да прилага намалена акцизна ставка за бира, произведена в автономната област Мадейра
on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Portugal to apply a reduced rate of excise duty on locally produced beer in the autonomous region of Madeira
PE 402.492
PE 402.492v02-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони Error!
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development .....7
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0772 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0772 ),
– като взе предвид член 299, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0012/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0012/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по регионално развитие и становището на комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони ( A6‑0146/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0146/2008 ),
On 30 May 2007 Portugal seized the European Commission of a request for a derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty in order to apply a rate of excise duty lower than the national rate fixed in accordance with the provisions of Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992, to beer produced in Madeira in cases where production does not exceed 300.000 hectolitres.
On 30 May 2007 Portugal seized the European Commission of a request for a derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty in order to apply a rate of excise duty lower than the national rate fixed in accordance with the provisions of Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992, to beer produced in Madeira in cases where production does not exceed 300.000 hectolitres.
This, in Portugal's view is essential for the survival of the local brewing industry.
This, in Portugal's view is essential for the survival of the local brewing industry.
Breweries in Madeira already benefit under the provisions of Article 4 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC which allows Member States to provide for the application of reduced rates of excise duty which must not be less than 50% below the standard national rate on beer produced by small independent breweries whose production does not exceed 200.000 hectolitres.
Breweries in Madeira already benefit under the provisions of Article 4 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC which allows Member States to provide for the application of reduced rates of excise duty which must not be less than 50% below the standard national rate on beer produced by small independent breweries whose production does not exceed 200.000 hectolitres.
Increased tourism has boosted production of one local brewery to a level dangerously close to the statutory limit beyond which it will no longer qualify for reduced rates.
Increased tourism has boosted production of one local brewery to a level dangerously close to the statutory limit beyond which it will no longer qualify for reduced rates.
It will then face severe competition from both large national and multi-national breweries which, unlike the small remote companies in Madeira, benefit from large marketing services, economies of scale and lower production costs..
It will then face severe competition from both large national and multi-national breweries which, unlike the small remote companies in Madeira, benefit from large marketing services, economies of scale and lower production costs..
As the Commission points out in its Explanatory memorandum, even with the 50% fiscal advantage, prices of locally produced beer are still 7.5% higher than the retail price of beer brewed on mainland Portugal, should that advantage disappear local production would be unable to compete.
As the Commission points out in its Explanatory memorandum, even with the 50% fiscal advantage, prices of locally produced beer are still 7.5% higher than the retail price of beer brewed on mainland Portugal, should that advantage disappear local production would be unable to compete.
Your rapporteur agrees with the European Commission in its assessment of the need to maintain the reduced rate of tax despite an increase in production levels.
Your rapporteur agrees with the European Commission in its assessment of the need to maintain the reduced rate of tax despite an increase in production levels.
In increasing the qualifying production level from 200.000 hectolitres to 300.000 hectolitres, the Commission has taken due account of any effect this may have on the single market.
In increasing the qualifying production level from 200.000 hectolitres to 300.000 hectolitres, the Commission has taken due account of any effect this may have on the single market.
It points out that this measure only affects one of the two breweries on the island of Madeira and that its effects can therefore be considered minimal.
It points out that this measure only affects one of the two breweries on the island of Madeira and that its effects can therefore be considered minimal.
Beer imported into Madeira from breweries located in mainland Portugal or elsewhere will not benefit.
Beer imported into Madeira from breweries located in mainland Portugal or elsewhere will not benefit.
In order to further ensure that the increased production rate does not give an unfair advantage to Madeira companies in the context of the total Portuguese market, it is specifically provided that production in excess of 200.000 hectolitres
In order to further ensure that the increased production rate does not give an unfair advantage to Madeira companies in the context of the total Portuguese market, it is specifically provided that production in excess of 200.000 hectolitres
The present limit on the level of production. will only benefit to the extent it is consumed locally
The present limit on the level of production. will only benefit to the extent it is consumed locally
In your Rapporteur's opinion, whilst the proposed decision is essentially technical it is important that Parliament review it to ensure that the qualifying conditions governing the original authorization still exist and to control that no undue advantage was being given to one sector of the beer market.
In your Rapporteur's opinion, whilst the proposed decision is essentially technical it is important that Parliament review it to ensure that the qualifying conditions governing the original authorization still exist and to control that no undue advantage was being given to one sector of the beer market.
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development
по предложение за решение на Съвета за упълномощаване на Португалия да прилага намалена акцизна ставка за бира, произведена в автономната област Мадейра
on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Portugal to apply a reduced rate of excise duty on locally produced beer in the autonomous region of Madeira
Commission's proposal
Commission's proposal
Portugal is seeking a derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty in order to apply a rate of excise duty, lower than the national rate fixed in accordance with Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 to locally produced beer in Madeira by independent breweries whose annual production does not exceed 300 000 hectolitres instead of 200 000 hectolitres.
Portugal is seeking a derogation from Article 90 of the Treaty in order to apply a rate of excise duty, lower than the national rate fixed in accordance with Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 to locally produced beer in Madeira by independent breweries whose annual production does not exceed 300 000 hectolitres instead of 200 000 hectolitres.
Portugal has explained that it considers such a move to be essential for the survival of the local brewing industry, as increased tourism has caused one of the two breweries located in Madeira to be approaching an annual production of 200 000 hectolitres, a quantity above which its entitlement to reduced rates under existing provisions would cease.
Portugal has explained that it considers such a move to be essential for the survival of the local brewing industry, as increased tourism has caused one of the two breweries located in Madeira to be approaching an annual production of 200 000 hectolitres, a quantity above which its entitlement to reduced rates under existing provisions would cease.
However, should breweries located in Madeira reach production in excess of that threshold, this would not mean that they were in a sufficiently strong position to face up to competition from beers from mainland Portugal (or mainland Europe).
However, should breweries located in Madeira reach production in excess of that threshold, this would not mean that they were in a sufficiently strong position to face up to competition from beers from mainland Portugal (or mainland Europe).
Their share of the local market would most likely continue to shrink due to strong competition from foreign beers and insufficient possibilities offered by Article 4 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages to offset the disadvantages suffered by the breweries in Madeira on account of their remote location, fragmented terrain and tight local markets.
Their share of the local market would most likely continue to shrink due to strong competition from foreign beers and insufficient possibilities offered by Article 4 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages to offset the disadvantages suffered by the breweries in Madeira on account of their remote location, fragmented terrain and tight local markets.
Additional costs comprise maintaining high level of stocks, transport of raw and secondary materials, and packaging from mainland Portugal.
Additional costs comprise maintaining high level of stocks, transport of raw and secondary materials, and packaging from mainland Portugal.
Notwithstanding competitive pressure, the retail selling price of a Madeira beer (at EUR 128 per hectolitre) is currently about 7.5 per cent higher than the retail selling price of beer brewed in mainland Portugal and sold on the market of Madeira (at EUR 119 per hectolitre).
Notwithstanding competitive pressure, the retail selling price of a Madeira beer (at EUR 128 per hectolitre) is currently about 7.5 per cent higher than the retail selling price of beer brewed in mainland Portugal and sold on the market of Madeira (at EUR 119 per hectolitre).
Therefore, if those breweries lose the benefit of the tax reduction, the difference in the retail selling price would increase to at least 15 per cent (EUR 137 per hectolitre).
Therefore, if those breweries lose the benefit of the tax reduction, the difference in the retail selling price would increase to at least 15 per cent (EUR 137 per hectolitre).
Thus, even though such breweries would, upon reaching 200 000 hectolitres annual production, cease to be "small" as defined in the said Article 4, they would nonetheless continue to be small compared to the large national and multi-national breweries with whom they compete.
Thus, even though such breweries would, upon reaching 200 000 hectolitres annual production, cease to be "small" as defined in the said Article 4, they would nonetheless continue to be small compared to the large national and multi-national breweries with whom they compete.
It is, therefore, essential for continued survival of the local industry that a brewery should benefit from a reduced rate in case its annual production exceeds 200 000 hectolitres and is consumed locally, without however going beyond 300 000 hectolitres.
It is, therefore, essential for continued survival of the local industry that a brewery should benefit from a reduced rate in case its annual production exceeds 200 000 hectolitres and is consumed locally, without however going beyond 300 000 hectolitres.
This derogation would last until 31 December 2013 and would be reviewed mid-way.
This derogation would last until 31 December 2013 and would be reviewed mid-way.
The draftsman shares the opinion of the Commission and wishes to see the application of a reduced rate of excise duty, which may fall below the minimum rate but shall not be set more than 50 per cent lower than the standard national excise duty rate for Portugal, to beer produced in the autonomous region of Madeira by independent breweries whose total annual production does not exceed 300 000 hectolitres; production in excess of 200 000 hectolitres will benefit from the reduced only to the extent it is consumed locally.
The draftsman shares the opinion of the Commission and wishes to see the application of a reduced rate of excise duty, which may fall below the minimum rate but shall not be set more than 50 per cent lower than the standard national excise duty rate for Portugal, to beer produced in the autonomous region of Madeira by independent breweries whose total annual production does not exceed 300 000 hectolitres; production in excess of 200 000 hectolitres will benefit from the reduced only to the extent it is consumed locally.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to propose approval of the Commission proposal.
The Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development calls on the Committee on Regional Development, as the committee responsible, to propose approval of the Commission proposal.
Alessandro Battilocchio, Katerina Batzeli, Esther De Lange, Ilda Figueiredo, Gábor Harangozó, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Brian Simpson, Struan Stevenson
Alessandro Battilocchio, Katerina Batzeli, Esther De Lange, Ilda Figueiredo, Gábor Harangozó, Wiesław Stefan Kuc, Brian Simpson, Struan Stevenson
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Rumiana Jeleva, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Sérgio Marques, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Vladimír Železný
Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Rumiana Jeleva, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Miloš Koterec, Constanze Angela Krehl, Sérgio Marques, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Elisabeth Schroedter, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Vladimír Železný
Bernadette Bourzai, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Madeleine Jouye de Grandmaison, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Ljudmila Novak, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Zita Pleštinská, Samuli Pohjamo, Christa Prets, Manfred Weber
Bernadette Bourzai, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Madeleine Jouye de Grandmaison, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Ljudmila Novak, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Zita Pleštinská, Samuli Pohjamo, Christa Prets, Manfred Weber
Jean-Paul Gauzès, Jacques Toubon
Jean-Paul Gauzès, Jacques Toubon
относно Нова стратегия на Европейския съюз за здравето на животните (2007-2013 г.)
on a new Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007-2013)
PE 398.296v03-00
PE 398.296v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по международна търговия ..........................18
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................16
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНОТО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ ...................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................19
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията относно Нова стратегия на Европейския съюз за здравето на животните (2007-2013 г.), според която „Пo-добре превенция, отколкото лечение” ( COM(2007)0539 ), както и работните документи на службите на Комисията (Оценка на въздействието и резюме на Оценката на въздействието), придружаващи гореспоменатото съобщение ( SEC(2007)1189 и ( SEC(2007)1190 ) („Съобщение относно стратегията за здравето на животните“),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on a new Animal Health Strategy for the European Union (2007-2013) where "Prevention is better than cure" ( COM(2007)0539 ) and the Commission staff working documents (Impact Assessment and Summary of the Impact Assessment) accompanying that communication ( SEC(2007)1189 and SEC(2007)1190 ) ("Animal Health Strategy Communication"),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони и становището на комисията по международна търговия ( A6-0147/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A6‑0147/2008 ),
A. като има предвид, че здравето на животните е тясно свързано със здравето на човека, поради възможността от пряко или непряко предаване на някои болести,
A. whereas animal health is closely linked to human health, owing to the possibility of direct or indirect transmission of certain diseases,
Б. като има предвид, че здравето на животните е важно от икономическа гледна точка, тъй като болестите по животните намаляват тяхната производителност, водят до смърт и необходимо умъртвяване, и до последващи икономически загуби,
B. whereas animal health is important in economic terms because animal diseases lower animal production and lead to animal death, necessary culling and consequential economic loss,
В. като има предвид, че животните са живи, чувствителни същества и че тяхната защита и хуманното отношение към тях е едно от предизвикателствата за културна и цивилизована Европа на 21-ви век,
C. whereas animals are living, sentient beings and their protection and correct treatment is one of the challenges for a cultured and civilised 21st-Century Europe,
Г. като има предвид, че появата на масови заболявания при животните в много случаи може да доведе до значителни сътресения и социални проблеми в селските райони,
D. whereas major outbreaks of animal disease can often result in social dislocation and social problems in rural areas,
Д. като има предвид, че благосъстоянието на животните е фактор, но не единствен такъв, който допринася за тяхното здраве и е обосновано от етични, социални и икономически съображения и трябва да почива на здрава научна основа,
E. whereas animal welfare is one factor, but not the only one, which contributes to animal health and is justified on ethical, social and economic grounds and must be based on solid scientific foundations,
Е. като има предвид, че търговският обмен е все по-глобализиран и че търговията с животински продукти нараства, както в ЕС, така и в международен план,
F. whereas trade is becoming increasingly globalised and the trade in animal products is on the increase, both within the EU and internationally,
Ж. като има предвид, че съществува необходимост от координирано сътрудничество по въпросите в областта на здравето на животните на европейско и световно равнище,
G. whereas there is a need for coordinated cooperation on animal health issues at EU and global level,
З. като има предвид, че ефективността на дейностите, свързани със здравето на животните, зависи не само от взетите административни мерки, но също така и от съзнателното и отдадено сътрудничество между всички заинтересовани страни,
H. whereas the effectiveness of action on animal health depends not only on the administrative measures taken but also on informed and committed cooperation between all stakeholders,
И. като има предвид, че най-добрият начин за борба с болестите по животните е тяхното предотвратяване, съгласно принципите, които гласят „пo-добре превенция, отколкото лечение “ и „по-добре лечение, отколкото ненужно умъртвяване“,
I. whereas the best means of combating animal diseases is to prevent them from occurring in the first place, in accordance with the principles that 'prevention is better than cure' and 'cure is better than unnecessary culling',