natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Consultative Working Party had all language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EEC) 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus and Council Regulation (EC) No 12/98 of 11 December 1997 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road passenger transport services within a Member State resulted in the Consultative Working Party's establishing, by common accord, as follows:
The Consultative Working Party had all language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EEC) 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus and Council Regulation (EC) No 12/98 of 11 December 1997 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road passenger transport services within a Member State resulted in the Consultative Working Party's establishing, by common accord, as follows:
1) An incorrect title had been erroneously indicated in the cover page of the abovementioned document having been officially transmitted on 23 May 2007, which read "Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus"; in that document, the correct title was that appearing at the beginning of the text of the recast proposal and reading "Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the market for coach and bus services".
1) An incorrect title had been erroneously indicated in the cover page of the abovementioned document having been officially transmitted on 23 May 2007, which read "Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus"; in that document, the correct title was that appearing at the beginning of the text of the recast proposal and reading "Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the market for coach and bus services".
Incidentally, it should be pointed out that on 1 June 2007 a new document bearing a reference number COM(2007) 264 final/2 has been officially transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council; on the cover page of that new document a corrigendum appears, which reads "Annule et remplace la page de couverture du document COM(2007)264 final .du 23.5.2007 / Cette correction concerne les versions EN,FR,DE".
Incidentally, it should be pointed out that on 1 June 2007 a new document bearing a reference number COM(2007) 264 final/2 was officially transmitted to the European Parliament and to the Council; on the cover page of that new document a corrigendum appears, which reads "Annule et remplace la page de couverture du document COM(2007)264 final .du 23.5.2007 / Cette correction concerne les versions EN,FR,DE".
2) The following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type used for marking substantive changes:
2) The following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type used for marking substantive changes:
the entire text of the second subparagraph of point (3.4) of Article 2 of Regulation 684/92, appearing twice in the text of the recast proposal already marked with double strikethrough, once between the texts of points (c) and (d) of Article 2 and once between the fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 5(3);
the entire text of the second subparagraph of point (3.4) of Article 2 of Regulation 684/92, appearing twice in the text of the recast proposal already marked with double strikethrough, once between the texts of points (c) and (d) of Article 2 and once between the fourth and fifth subparagraphs of Article 5(3);
the entire text of Article 3a(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing immediately after Article 4(4) in the text of the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 3a(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing immediately after Article 4(4) in the text of the recast proposal;
the entire text of the second subparagraph of Article 13(3) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the text of Article 5(5) in the recast proposal;
the entire text of the second subparagraph of Article 13(3) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing in the text of Article 5(5) in the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 5(4) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 6 in the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 5(4) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 6 in the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 6(2) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7 in the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 6(2) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 7 in the recast proposal;
in Article 8(8), the word "within" (already marked with double strikethrough) and the word "after";
in Article 8(8), the word "within" (already marked with double strikethrough) and the word "after";
the entire text of Article 11(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 12 in the recast proposal;
the entire text of Article 11(5) of Regulation 684/92, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing between the texts of paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 12 in the recast proposal;
the initial wording of Article 6(2), introductory words, of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, before the introductory words of Article 17(2) in the recast proposal;
the initial wording of Article 6(2), introductory words, of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, before the introductory words of Article 17(2) in the recast proposal;
the second sentence of Article 6(3) of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, after the text of Article 17(3) in the recast proposal;
the second sentence of Article 6(3) of Regulation 12/98, appearing as a deleted text, marked with double strikethrough, after the text of Article 17(3) in the recast proposal;
the entire text of the third subparagraph of point (3) of Article 3 of Regulation 12/98, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing at the end of
the entire text of the third subparagraph of point (3) of Article 3 of Regulation 12/98, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing at the end of
point (c) of Article 15 in the text of the recast proposal;
point (c) of Article 15 in the text of the recast proposal;
the entire text of the fourth subparagraph of point (3) of Article 3 of Regulation
the entire text of the fourth subparagraph of point (3) of Article 3 of Regulation
12/98, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing
12/98, having been already marked with double strikethrough and appearing
immediately after the proposed text of Article 15 in the recast proposal;
immediately after the proposed text of Article 15 in the recast proposal;
in Article 16(l)(a), the word "rates";
in Article 16(l)(a), the word "rates";
in the title of Chapter VI, in the second subparagraph of Article 22(1), in Article
in the title of Chapter VI, in the second subparagraph of Article 22(1), in Article
23(2) and in Article 27, the words "penalties" (already marked with double
23(2) and in Article 27, the words "penalties" (already marked with double
strikethrough) and "sanctions" (already marked with adaptation arrows);
strikethrough) and "sanctions" (already marked with adaptation arrows);
in Article 18(1), introductory words, the wordings "Passengers using" and "throughout their journey possess" (all having been already marked with double strikethrough), and "Carriers operating" and "issue" (all presented between adaptation arrows);
in Article 18(1), introductory words, the wordings "Passengers using" and "throughout their journey possess" (all having been already marked with double strikethrough), and "Carriers operating" and "issue" (all presented between adaptation arrows);
in Article 22(l)(a), the word "permanent" (already marked with adaptation arrows);
in Article 22(l)(a), the word "permanent" (already marked with adaptation arrows);
in Article 22(l)(b), the word "temporary" (already included in a part of text marked with adaptation arrows).
in Article 22(l)(b), the word "temporary" (already included in a part of text marked with adaptation arrows).
3) The deleted texts of Section IV of Regulation 684/92 appearing immediately after new Article 13 in the recast proposal and of Article 16(5) of the same regulation appearing immediately after new Article 20 should have not appeared in the recast proposal.
3) The deleted texts of Section IV of Regulation 684/92 appearing immediately after new Article 13 in the recast proposal and of Article 16(5) of the same regulation appearing immediately after new Article 20 should have not appeared in the recast proposal.
4) It was acknowledged that a certain inconsistency would appear to exist between the text of point 5(c) of Annex I and that of Article 22(1), in that the said point appears to quote the contents of the introductory wording and of point (a) of Article 22(1) without mentioning its point (b).
4) It was acknowledged that a certain inconsistency would appear to exist between the text of point 5(c) of Annex I and that of Article 22(1), in that the said point appears to quote the contents of the introductory wording and of point (a) of Article 22(1) without mentioning its point (b).
5) It was also acknowledged that the correlation table in Annex II is not accurate, and would therefore need to be completed and corrected where necessary.
5) It was also acknowledged that the correlation table in Annex II is not accurate, and would therefore need to be completed and corrected where necessary.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such therein or in the present opinion.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such therein or in the present opinion.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Международен пътнически автобусен превоз (преработка)
International carriage of passengers by coach and bus (recast)
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Roberts Zīle
PE 396.395v03-00
PE 396.395v03-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT.....................................................................................21
ANNEX 1: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS......................................24
ANNEX 1: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS.............................23
ANNEX 2: LETTRE AVIS DU GROUPE CONSULATIF DES SERVICES JURIDIQUES.....26
ANNEX 2: OPINION IN LETTER FORM OF THE LEGAL SERVICES' CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY 25
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2007)0265 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0265 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 71 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0146/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0146/2007 ),
– като взе предвид междуинституционалното споразумение от 28 ноември 2001 г. за по-структуриран подход към техниката на преработка на нормативни актове
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts
– като взе предвид писмото на комисията по правни въпроси от 20 ноември 2007 г. в съответствие с член 80а, параграф 3 от правилника,
– having regard to the letter of 20 November 2007 from the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0038/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0038/2008 ),
Съображение 4a (ново)
Recital 4 a (new)
4a) Входящият или изходящият автомобилен превоз на товари, като част от комбиниран транспорт при условията, определени в Директива 92/106/EИО на Съвета от 7 декември 1992 г. относно създаването на общи правила за някои видове комбиниран транспорт на товари между държавите-членки 1 , и следователно комбиниран ж.п./автомобилен транспорт и/или воден/автомобилен транспорт в двете посоки, не попада в определението за каботаж.
(4a) The incoming or outgoing car ria ge of goods by road as one leg of a combined transport journey under the conditions laid down in Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States 1 , and therefore combined rail/road transport and/or water/road transport in both directions, does not fall under the definition of cabotage.
1 OВ L 368, 17.12.1992 г., стp.
1 OJ L 368, 17.12.1992, p.
Директива, последно изменена с Директива 2006/103/EО (OВ L 363, 20.12.2006 г., стp.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2006/103/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
Current practices in certain Member States do not adhere to this trend, but that cannot and must not be the intention.
Current practices in certain Member States do not adhere to this trend, but that cannot and must not be the intention.
9) Следва да се установи атестационно свидетелство за водачи на МПС, за да могат държавите-членки ефективно да проверяват дали водачите на МПС от трети страни са законосъобразно наети на работа или на разположение на превозвача, който отговаря за конкретен превоз.
(9) A driver attestation should also be established, in order to allow Member States to check effectively whether drivers from third countries are lawfully employed or at the disposal of the haulier responsible for a given transport operation.
Това свидетелство за водачи на МПС следва да бъде разбираемо за всяко лице, извършващо такива проверки.
This driver attestation should be comprehensible to any person who carries out such checks.
11) В миналото такива национални транспортни служби са били временно упълномощени.
(11) In the past, such national transport services were authorised on a temporary basis.
На практика е било трудно да се установи кои са упълномощените служби.
In practice, it has been difficult to ascertain which services are authorised.
Поради това са необходими ясни и лесно приложими правила.
Clear and easily enforceable rules are thus needed.
В по-дългосрочна перспектива, обаче, ограниченията относно каботажа не са обосновани.
In the longer term, however, the restrictions on cabotage are no longer justifiable.
Те трябва да бъдат напълно премахнати, тъй като не съответстват на принципите на вътрешен пазар без граници, където се гарантира свободно движение на стоки и услуги.
They must be completely abolished, as these restrictions do not accord with the principles of an internal market without borders where the freemovement of goods and services is guaranteed.
Държавите-членки следва да предприемат всички необходими мерки, за да гарантират еднообразно прилагане на правилата на цялата територия на ЕС.
The Member States should take all the necessary measures to ensure that the rules are enforced uniformly throughout the EU.
Free movement of services and a common transport policy were already provided for in the Treaties of 1957.
Free movement of services and a common transport policy were already provided for in the Treaties of 1957.
In 1985 the EP brought proceedings against the Council before the Court of Justice because of its failure to act and formulate a common transport policy.
In 1985 the EP brought proceedings against the Council before the Court of Justice because of its failure to act and formulate a common transport policy.
As a result of this judgment, the first initiatives to liberalise the road haulage market were taken.
As a result of this judgment, the first initiatives to liberalise the road haulage market were taken.
We must not now turn the clock back but on the contrary should aim for complete liberalisation of the cabotage market in 2012.
We must not now turn the clock back but on the contrary should aim for complete liberalisation of the cabotage market in 2012.
From the environmental point of view we should ensure that road haulage is as efficient as possible and limit the number of unladen journeys to the absolute minimum.
From the environmental point of view we should ensure that road haulage is as efficient as possible and limit the number of unladen journeys to the absolute minimum.
Съображение 12a (ново)
Recital 12 a (new)
12a) Ограниченията относно броя и продължителността на каботажните превози са необходим, но междинен етап, чиято цел е да се насърчат държавите-членки в максимална степен да хармонизират данъчните условия и условията на труд.
(12a) Restrictions on the number and duration of cabotage operations are a necessary but intermediate stage aimed at encouraging the Member States to maximise the harmonisation of fiscal and working conditions.
Следователно наложените съгласно настоящия регламент ограничения имат временен характер и следва да бъдат премахнати от 1 януари 2014 г..
The restrictions imposed under this Regulation are therefore temporary and should be lifted with effect from 1 January 2014.
In an internal market restrictions on cabotage operations should only be temporary.
In an internal market restrictions on cabotage operations should only be temporary.
Therefore, a specific date has to be mentioned to encourage the harmonisation of fiscal and working conditions.
Therefore, a specific date has to be mentioned to encourage the harmonisation of fiscal and working conditions.
Съображение 12б (ново)
Recital 12 b (new)
12б) Между някои съседни държави-членки съществуват интензивни и дългогодишни икономически връзки.
(12b) Some neighbouring Member States have intensive, long-standing economic links.
Следователно тези държави-членки следва да могат да предоставят на превозвачите от съответните съседни държави-членки по-широк достъп до каботаж.
Such Member States should therefore be allowed to grant wider access to cabotage to hauliers from the neighbouring Member States in question.
Member States which have strong economic links should be able to go further in opening up the market between them.
Member States which have strong economic links should be able to go further in opening up the market between them.
See also amendment creating a new paragraph 6b for Article 8.
See also amendment creating a new paragraph 6b for Article 8.
Съображение 13a (ново)
Recital 13 a (new)
13a) Следва да е възможно да се гарантира, че презграничната търговия, т.е. международните превози между две държави-членки, никоя от които не е държавата-членка по пребиваване на превозвача, не води до положения, при които редовното, постоянно и системно осъществяване на презгранични превози да нарушава пазара чрез прилагане на условия на заетост и труд, които са по-неблагоприятни от приложимите в двете държави-членки, между които се осъществява презграничната търговия.
(13a) It should be possible to ensure that cross-trade – i.e. international transport operations between two Member States neither of which is the haulier’s Member State of residence – does not lead to situations whereby, owing to its regularity, continuity and systematic nature, it distorts the market by applying to it less favourable employment and working conditions than those which apply in the two Member States between which the cross-trade is taking place.
It needs to be possible to prevent problems caused by hauliers who carry out cross-trade on a regular and systematic basis taking advantage of the less favourable social and pay conditions in their country of establishment.
It needs to be possible to prevent problems caused by hauliers who carry out cross-trade on a regular and systematic basis taking advantage of the less favourable social and pay conditions in their country of establishment.
See also amendment creating a new Article 7a.
See also amendment creating a new Article 7a.
14) Административните формалности следва да бъдат сведени до минимум, без да се премахват проверките и санкциите, гарантиращи правилното и ефективно прилагане на настоящия регламент.
(14) Administrative formalities should be reduced as far as possible without abandoning the controls and sanctions that guarantee the correct application and effective enforcement of this Regulation.
Сегашните правила следва да се адаптират, за да могат ефективно да се санкционират тежки или повторни маловажни нарушения, извършени в държава-членка, различна от държавата-членка на установяване.
The current rules should be adapted to allow the effective sanctioning of serious or repeated minor infringements committed in a Member State other than the Member State of establishment.
Всички наложени санкции следва да могат да се обжалват.
It should be possible to lodge an appeal in respect of any sanctions imposed .