natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
All the data protection shortcomings identified had been remedied.
All the data protection shortcomings identified had been remedied.
The IT infrastructure was considered to be well-thought-out and highly developed.
The IT infrastructure was considered to be well-thought-out and highly developed.
The data centres were found to be well-equipped and well-managed, and the end-users properly trained.
The data centres were found to be well-equipped and well-managed, and the end-users properly trained.
Recommendations were made on minor aspects: these are being implemented.
Recommendations were made on minor aspects: these are being implemented.
RAPPORTEUR'S CONCLUSIONS
RAPPORTEUR'S CONCLUSIONS
Taking into account the results of the evaluations and the necessary revisits carried out by the expert teams, the rapporteur concludes that, although there are some outstanding issues that will require follow-up at some point in the future, they do not constitute an obstacle to full Schengen membership for these Member States.
Taking into account the results of the evaluations and the necessary revisits carried out by the expert teams, the rapporteur concludes that, although there are some outstanding issues that will require follow-up at some point in the future, they do not constitute an obstacle to full Schengen membership for these Member States.
It appears from the experts' conclusions (which have yielded satisfactory results) that all nine of these new Member States have proved that they are sufficiently prepared to apply all the provisions of the Schengen acquis in a satisfactory manner.
It appears from the experts' conclusions (which have yielded satisfactory results) that all nine of these new Member States have proved that they are sufficiently prepared to apply all the provisions of the Schengen acquis in a satisfactory manner.
Your rapporteur therefore supports the decision to open up the borders for the Member States named above.
Your rapporteur therefore supports the decision to open up the borders for the Member States named above.
Nevertheless, Parliament expects the Member States concerned to inform the Council and Parliament, in writing and in the course of the next six months, on the follow-up they intend to undertake regarding the recommendations and on the necessary changes that are still being made.
Nevertheless, Parliament expects the Member States concerned to inform the Council and Parliament, in writing and in the course of the next six months, on the follow-up they intend to undertake regarding the recommendations and on the necessary changes that are still being made.
Your rapporteur stresses that the removal of controls at the internal borders requires the existence of mutual trust as regards effective controls at the external borders.
Your rapporteur stresses that the removal of controls at the internal borders requires the existence of mutual trust as regards effective controls at the external borders.
In fact, the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and efficiency that each Member State applies to controls at its external borders, and, also, on the quality and rapidity of the exchange of information via the SIS.
In fact, the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and efficiency that each Member State applies to controls at its external borders, and, also, on the quality and rapidity of the exchange of information via the SIS.
Any weakness or incorrect working of any of these elements is liable to jeopardise the security of the Union and the effectiveness of the Schengen area.
Any weakness or incorrect working of any of these elements is liable to jeopardise the security of the Union and the effectiveness of the Schengen area.
Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber
Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Martine Roure, Inger Segelström, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber
Adamos Adamou, Marco Cappato, Koenraad Dillen, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Eva-Britt Svensson
Adamos Adamou, Marco Cappato, Koenraad Dillen, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Eva-Britt Svensson
Fernando Fernández Martín
Fernando Fernández Martín
относно общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемане на директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Директива на Съвета 89/552/ЕИО относно координирането на някои разпоредби, формулирани в действащи закони, подзаконови и административни актове на държавите-членки, отнасящи се до упражняване на телевизионна дейност
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities
PE 396.653v01-00
PE 396.653v02-00
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (10076/6/2007 – C6‑0352/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (10076/6/2007 – C6‑0352/2007 ),
Текстове, приети на 13.12.2006, T6-0559/2006. относно предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2005)0646 )
Texts adopted, 13.12.2006, T6-0559/2006. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0646 ),
– като взе предвид измененото предложение на Комисията ( COM(2007)0170 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0170 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по култура и образование ( A6‑0442/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6‑0442/2007 ),
4. възлага на своя генерален секретар да подпише акта, след като е направена проверка за надлежното изпълнение на всички процедури, и съвместно с генералния секретар на Съвета да пристъпи към публикуването му в Официален вестник на ЕС;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Координиране на някои разпоредби на държавите-членки, отнасящи се до упражняване на телевизионна дейност
Coordination of certain of the Member States’ provisions on television broadcasting
13.12.2006 T6-0559/2006
13.12.2006 T6-0559/2006
Katerina Batzeli, Ivo Belet, Giovanni Berlinguer, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Ovidiu Victor Ganţ, Claire Gibault, Vasco Graça Moura, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Mikel Irujo Amezaga, Manolis Mavrommatis, Marianne Mikko, Ljudmila Novak, Doris Pack, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Christa Prets, Pál Schmitt, Gheorghe Vergil Şerbu, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Tomáš Zatloukal
Katerina Batzeli, Ivo Belet, Giovanni Berlinguer, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Jolanta Dičkutė, Věra Flasarová, Milan Gaľa, Ovidiu Victor Ganţ, Claire Gibault, Vasco Graça Moura, Christopher Heaton-Harris, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Ruth Hieronymi, Mikel Irujo Amezaga, Manolis Mavrommatis, Marianne Mikko, Ljudmila Novak, Doris Pack, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Christa Prets, Pál Schmitt, Gheorghe Vergil Şerbu, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Tomáš Zatloukal
Den Dover, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Ewa Tomaszewska, Cornelis Visser
Den Dover, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Ewa Tomaszewska, Cornelis Visser
PE 394.145v02-00
PE 394.145v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2007)0478 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0478 ),
– като взе предвид член 308 във връзка с член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 308 in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО, съобразно който Съветът е провел консултация с Парламента ( C6-0311/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0311/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6-0443/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0443/2007 ),
The respect and promotion of human rights constitute one of the founding principles and major objectives of the European Union which alongside the Council of Europe has developed its own legal instruments for the protection of fundamental human rights.
The respect and promotion of human rights constitute one of the founding principles and major objectives of the European Union which alongside the Council of Europe has developed its own legal instruments for the protection of fundamental human rights.
The EU system of principles of fundamental rights protection has mainly been developed by the case law of the Court of Justice and confirmed by the express recognition within the EU Treaties.
The EU system of principles of fundamental rights protection has mainly been developed by the case law of the Court of Justice and confirmed by the express recognition within the EU Treaties.
However, it is of great significance to guarantee that this system of protection of human rights is further strengthened whilst safeguarding basic principles such as non- discrimination, non- exclusion, respect of freedom of expression and religion, freedom of conscience, as well as social and economic rights.
However, it is of great significance to guarantee that this system of protection of human rights is further strengthened whilst safeguarding basic principles such as non- discrimination, non- exclusion, respect of freedom of expression and religion, freedom of conscience, as well as social and economic rights.
The European Fundamental Rights Agency could provide the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Community and its Member States when implementing Community law with the above-mentioned safeguards.
The European Fundamental Rights Agency could provide the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Community and its Member States when implementing Community law with the above-mentioned safeguards.
It is important to recognise that during the last fifty years, since its inception and establishment, it is the Council of Europe that has developed through its advanced work on the field a comprehensive system of norms, legal and judicial instruments for the protection and promotion of human rights and the rule of law and has gathered extensive experience.
It is important to recognise that during the last fifty years, since its inception and establishment, it is the Council of Europe that has developed through its advanced work on the field a comprehensive system of norms, legal and judicial instruments for the protection and promotion of human rights and the rule of law and has gathered extensive experience.
Therefore, the common aim of protection of fundamental rights shared by both FRA and the Council of Europe has to be achieved in a complementary and positive manner, duplication has to be avoided as well as any possibility of fragilisation and embrittlement of the well- established (judicial and not) system of human rights and individual rights protection put in place by the Council of Europe.
Therefore, the common aim of protection of fundamental rights shared by both FRA and the Council of Europe has to be achieved in a complementary and positive manner, duplication has to be avoided as well as any possibility of fragilisation and embrittlement of the well- established (judicial and not) system of human rights and individual rights protection put in place by the Council of Europe.
As regards the co-financing of mutual activities Council, FRA and Council of Europe should agree on more precise rules regarding the implementation of Article 15 of the Agreement which provides for grants to be received by the Council of Europe from the Agency, with the aim of achieving full transparency and avoiding any insinuation for excessive interdependence among the two institutions; in particular, a possible precondition could be that the relevant grants are ascribed for activities which are carried out jointly and in cooperation with the Council of Europe.;
As regards the co-financing of mutual activities Council, FRA and Council of Europe should agree on more precise rules regarding the implementation of Article 15 of the Agreement which provides for grants to be received by the Council of Europe from the Agency, with the aim of achieving full transparency and avoiding any insinuation for excessive interdependence among the two institutions; in particular, a possible precondition could be that the relevant grants are ascribed for activities which are carried out jointly and in cooperation with the Council of Europe.;
It is also essential to implement Article 7 of the Agreement in a way which would allow the two institutions to exchange, upon the mutual consent, as much data as possible with respect to their rules of procedure, to the widest extent possible under the applicable rules on confidentiality; the respective information should not be used by institutions other than the ones directly involved in the examination of the issues at stake; they should also not be made available to institutions or agencies of third countries, in the absence of guarantees and controls regarding their use.
It is also essential to implement Article 7 of the Agreement in a way which would allow the two institutions to exchange, upon the mutual consent, as much data as possible with respect to their rules of procedure, to the widest extent possible under the applicable rules on confidentiality; the respective information should not be used by institutions other than the ones directly involved in the examination of the issues at stake; they should also not be made available to institutions or agencies of third countries, in the absence of guarantees and controls regarding their use..
FRA should ensure that the EU maintains and upholds its firm commitment for respect of the fundamental rights in third countries; these are to be carried out in agreement with the works and policies of the competent international organisations such as the UN or with different international agreements by which they are covered.
FRA should ensure that the EU maintains and upholds its firm commitment for respect of the fundamental rights in third countries; these are to be carried out in agreement with the works and policies of the competent international organisations such as the UN or with different international agreements by which they are covered.
The cooperation between the Commission and the Council of Europe during negotiations for the attainment of the Agreement has proved to be beneficial; and it is in the same spirit of cooperation, transparency and complementarity that the two institutions are also expected to co-operate efficiently in the future.
The cooperation between the Commission and the Council of Europe during negotiations for the attainment of the Agreement has proved to be beneficial; and it is in the same spirit of cooperation, transparency and complementarity that the two institutions are also expected to co-operate efficiently in the future.
However, it is of immense importance that the European Parliament is involved in this process through periodic reports and that the Council of Europe is consulted for all the reviews or assessments carried out regarding the complementarity, the non-duplication and transparency of the works of the two institutions.
However, it is of immense importance that the European Parliament is involved in this process through periodic reports and that the Council of Europe is consulted for all the reviews or assessments carried out regarding the complementarity, the non-duplication and transparency of the works of the two institutions.
Сътрудничество между Агенцията на Европейския съюз за основните права и Съвета на Европа
Cooperation between the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Council of Europe
Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Carlos Coelho, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Armando França, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Lilli Gruber, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Adamos Adamou, Simon Busuttil, Marco Cappato, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Metin Kazak, Eva-Britt Svensson
Adamos Adamou, Simon Busuttil, Marco Cappato, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Metin Kazak, Eva-Britt Svensson
по одобрение от Европейския парламент на Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз
on the approval by the European Parliament of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union
PE 396.543v01-00
PE 396.543v02-00
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ..........................................3
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION................................................3
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ: ХАРТА НА ОСНОВНИТЕ ПРАВА НА СЪЮЗА.................................................5
ANNEX: THE CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE UNION...........................5
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ..................................................19
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................20
за одобрение от Европейския парламент на Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз
on the approval by the European Parliament of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union
– като взе предвид писмото от своя председател от 25 октомври 2007 г.,
– having regard to the letter from its President of 25 October 2007,
– като взе предвид Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз, подписана и обявена в Ница на 7 декември 2000 г.
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union signed and proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000
– като взе предвид своето решение от 14 ноември 2000 г. за одобрение на проекта на Харта за основните права на Европейския съюз
– having regard to its decision of 14 November 2000 approving the draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 23 октомври 2002 г. относно въздействието на Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз и нейния бъдещ статут
– having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2002 on the impact of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and its future status
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 24 септември 2003 г. относно проекта на Договор за създаване на Конституция за Европа и становището на Европейския парламент относно свикването на Междуправителствената конференция (МПК)
– having regard to its resolution of 24 September 2003 on the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the European Parliament's opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC)
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 12 януари 2005 г. относно Договора за създаване на Конституция за Европа
– having regard to its resolution of 12 January 2005 on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 11 юли 2007 г. относно свикването на Междуправителствената конференция (МПК): становище на Европейския парламент (член 48 от Договора за ЕС)
– having regard to its resolution of 11 July 2007 on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC): The European Parliament's opinion (Article 48 of the EU Treaty)
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2007)0328 (доклад Leinen). , по-специално параграфи 8, 12 и 17 от него,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2007)0328 (Leinen report). , in particular paragraphs 8, 12 and 17 thereof,
– като взе предвид член 6, параграф 1 от Договора за Европейски съюз, преработен в проекта на Договор за реформа, договорен от Междуправителствената конференция от 2007 г.,
– having regard to Article 6, Paragraph 1 of the Treaty on European Union, as revised by the draft Reform Treaty agreed by the 2007 Intergovernmental Conference,
– като взе предвид член 120, параграф 1 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rule 120(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по конституционни въпроси ( A6-0445/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0445/2007 ),
А. като има предвид, че като потвърждава правнообвързващия характер на Хартата за основните права, проектът на Договор за реформа запазва същината на основното постижение, а именно Част II от Договора за създаване на Конституция за Европа,
A. whereas, by confirming the legally binding status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the draft Reform Treaty has safeguarded the substance of the major achievement represented by Part II of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
Б. като има предвид, че Европейският парламент вече изрази съгласие с адаптациите на Хартата за основните права, тържествено провъзгласена в Ница на 7 декември 2000 г., когато, в горепосочената резолюция от 24 септември 2003 г., той направи оценка на резултатите от работата на Конвента за бъдещето на Европа, и когато, в горепосочената резолюция от 12 януари 2005 г., той одобри Договора за Конституция - резултат от работата на Междуправителствената конференция (МПК) от 2004 г.,
B. whereas the European Parliament has already agreed to the adaptations made to the Charter of Fundamental Rights as originally solemnly proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000, when, in its above-mentioned resolution of 24 September 2003, it assessed the results of the work of the Convention on the Future of Europe and when, in its above-mentioned resolution of 12 January 2005, it approved the Constitutional Treaty resulting from the work of the 2004 Intergovernmental Conference (IGC),
В. като има предвид, че в горепосочената резолюция от 11 юли 2007 г., предоставяйки становището си относно свикването на МПК през 2007 г., той приветства факта, че мандатът на МПК гарантира правнообвързващия характер на Хартата за основните права, но същевременно изразява сериозната си загриженост по отношение на Протокол №7, чиято цел е да ограничи възможността Хартата да подлежи на съдебен контрол в определени държави-членки,
C. whereas, in its above-mentioned resolution of 11 July 2007, in giving its opinion on the convening of the 2007 IGC, it welcomed the fact that the IGC mandate safeguarded the legally binding status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, while expressing its strong concerns about Protocol No 7, which seeks to limit the justiciability of the Charter in certain Member States,