natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
a) подробности по отношение на процедурата за определяне кои оператори на преносни мрежи са длъжни да плащат компенсации за трансграничните потоци, включително разграничение между операторите на националните преносни мрежи , от които произхождат трансграничните потоци и мрежите , в които те свършват, в съответствие с член 3, параграф 2;
(a) details of the procedure for determining which transmission system operators are liable to pay compensation for cross-border flows including as regards the split between the operators of national transmission systems from which cross-border flows originate and the systems where those flows end, in accordance with Article 3(2);
б) подробности по отношение на процедурата за плащане, която ще се следва, включително определяне на първия период от време, за който следва да бъде изплатена компенсация, в съответствие с втората алинея на член 3, параграф 3 ;
(b) details of the payment procedure to be followed, including the determination of the first period of time for which compensation is to be paid, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 3(3);
б) подробности по отношение на процедурата за плащане, която ще се следва, включително определяне на първия период от време, за който следва да бъде изплатена компенсация, в съответствие с член 3, параграф 3 , алинея втора ;
(b) details of the payment procedure to be followed, including the determination of the first period of time for which compensation is to be paid, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 3(3);
в) подробности по отношение на методологията за определяне на приетите трансгранични потоци, за които се дължи компенсация в съответствие с член 3, по отношение както на количество, така и на типа на тези потоци, както и определяне на величините на тези потоци като произхождащи и/или за свършващи в преносните системи на отделните държави-членки, в съответствие с член 3, параграф 5;
(c) details of methodologies for determining the cross-border flows hosted for which compensation is to be paid under Article 3, in terms of both quantity and type of flows, and the designation of the magnitudes of such flows as originating and/or ending in transmission systems of individual Member States, in accordance with Article 3(5);
в) подробности по отношение на методологията за определяне на приетите трансгранични потоци, за които се дължи компенсация в съответствие с член 3, по отношение както на количество, така и на типа на тези потоци, както и определяне на величините на тези потоци като произхождащи и/или за свършващи в преносните мрежи на отделните държави-членки, в съответствие с член 3, параграф 5;
(c) details of methodologies for determining the cross-border flows hosted for which compensation is to be paid under Article 3, in terms of both quantity and type of flows, and the designation of the magnitudes of such flows as originating and/or ending in transmission systems of individual Member States, in accordance with Article 3(5);
г) подробности по отношение на методологията за определяне на разходите и ползите в резултат на приемане на трансгранични потоци, в съответствие с член 3, параграф 6;
(d) details of the methodology for determining the costs and benefits incurred as a result of hosting cross-border flows, in accordance with Article 3(6);
д) подробности във връзка с третирането на потоци електроенергия, произхождащи или завършващи в страни извън Европейското икономическо пространство, в контекста на компенсаторния механизъм между операторите на преносни системи ;
(e) details of the treatment in the context of the inter-TSO compensation mechanism of electricity flows originating or ending in countries outside the European Economic Area;
д) подробности във връзка с третирането на потоци електроенергия, произхождащи или завършващи в страни извън Европейското икономическо пространство, в контекста на компенсаторния механизъм между операторите на преносни мрежи ;
(e) details of the treatment in the context of the inter-TSO compensation mechanism of electricity flows originating or ending in countries outside the European Economic Area;
е) участието на национални системи, които са свързани чрез електропроводи на прав ток, в съответствие с член 3.
(f) the participation of national systems which are interconnected through direct current lines, in accordance with Article 3.
Насоките могат да определят също така и подходящи правила, които водят до постепенно хармонизиране на основните принципи за определяне на таксите, налагани на производителите и потребителите (товар) при националните тарифни системи, включително и отразяване на компенсаторния механизъм между операторите на преносни системи при националните такси за достъп и осигуряване на подходящи и ефективни локационни сигнали, в съответствие с принципите, посочени в член 4.
Guidelines may also determine appropriate rules leading to a progressive harmonisation of the underlying principles for the setting of charges applied to producers and consumers (load) under national tariff systems, including the reflection of the inter-TSO compensation mechanism in national network charges and the provision of appropriate and efficient locational signals, in accordance with the principles set out in Article 4.
Насоките могат да определят също така и подходящи правила, които водят до постепенно хармонизиране на основните принципи за определяне на таксите, налагани на производителите и потребителите (товар) при националните тарифни системи, включително и отразяване на компенсаторния механизъм между операторите на преносни мрежи при националните такси за достъп и осигуряване на подходящи и ефективни локационни сигнали, в съответствие с принципите, посочени в член 4.
Guidelines on inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanisms may also determine appropriate rules leading to a progressive harmonisation of the underlying principles for the setting of charges applied to producers and consumers (load) under national tariff systems, including the reflection of the inter-TSO compensation mechanism in national network charges and the provision of appropriate and efficient locational signals, in accordance with the principles set out in Article 4.
Насоките също така предвиждат мерки за подходящи и ефективни хармонизирани локационни сигнали на европейско равнище.
The guidelines shall make provision for appropriate and efficient harmonised locational signals at European level.
Насоките относно компенсаторните механизми между операторите на преносните мрежи също така предвиждат мерки за подходящи и ефективни хармонизирани локационни сигнали на европейско равнище.
The guidelines on inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanisms shall make provision for appropriate and efficient harmonised locational signals at European level.
Всяко хармонизиране в това отношение няма да възпрепятства държавите-членки при прилагането на механизми, с които да гарантират, че таксите за достъп до мрежата, които плащат потребителите (товар) са съпоставими в цялата им територия.
Any harmonisation in this respect shall not prevent Member States from applying mechanisms to ensure that network access charges borne by consumers (load) are comparable throughout their territory.
Когато е целесъобразно, в насоките , в които се посочва минималната степен на необходима хармонизация за постигане целите на настоящия регламент, се уточняват също така и:
Where appropriate, guidelines providing the minimum degree of harmonisation required to achieve the aim of this Regulation shall also specify:
Когато е целесъобразно, Комисията може да предложи допълнителни насоки , в които се посочва минималната степен на необходима хармонизация за постигане целите на настоящия регламент.
Where appropriate, the Commission may propose additional guidance providing the minimum degree of harmonisation required to achieve the aim of this Regulation.
а) подробности относно предоставянето на информация в съответствие с принципите, изложени в член 5;
(a) details on provision of information, in accordance with the principles set out in Article 5;
б) подробности относно въпроси, свързани с пазара на дребно, обхванати от член 7а;
(b) details on the retail market issues covered by Article 7a;
в) подробности относно правилата за свързване, регулиращи връзката между операторите на преносни мрежи и свързаните потребители;
(c) details of connection rules governing the relation between the transmission system operators and connected customers;
г) подробности относно правилата за оперативна съвместимост;
(d) details of rules for interoperability;
д) подробности относно правилата за търговия с електроенергия;
(e) details of rules for the trading of electricity;
е) подробности относно правилата за балансиране и резервна мощност, целящи по-голяма интеграция на пазарите на балансиране и резервна мощност;
(f) details of balancing and reserve power rules aiming at further integration of the balancing and reserve power markets;
ж) подробности относно правилата за инвестиционните стимули, в това число локационните сигнали;
(g) details of investment incentive rules including locational signals;
з) подробности относно въпросите, изброени в член 2в, параграф 3.
(h) details on the topics listed in Article 2c(3).
Насоките за управлението и разпределянето на наличните преносни мощности на междусистемните електропроводи между националните системи са изложени в приложението.
Guidelines on the management and allocation of available transfer capacity of interconnections between national systems are laid down in the Annex.
Комисията може да приема насоки по отношение на въпросите, изброени в параграфи 1—3.
The Commission may adopt guidelines on the issues listed in paragraphs 1 to 3.
Тя може да променя насоките, посочени в параграф 4, в съответствие с принципите, изложени в членове 5 и 6, по-конкретно за да включи подробни насоки относно всички прилагани на практика методологии за разпределение на капацитет, и за да гарантира, че механизмите за управление на претоварването се развиват по начин, съвместим с целите на вътрешния пазар.
It may amend the guidelines referred to in paragraph 4, in accordance with the principles set out in Articles 5 and 6, in particular so as to include detailed guidelines on all capacity allocation methodologies applied in practice and to ensure that congestion management mechanisms evolve in a manner compatible with the objectiv es of the internal market.
При приемане или изменяне на насоките, Комисията гарантира, че те осигуряват минимално равнище на хармонизиране за постигане на целите на настоящия регламент и не надхвърлят необходимото за тази цел.
When adopting or amending guidelines, the Commission shall ensure that they p rovide the minimum degree of harmonisation required to achieve the aims of this Regulation and do not go beyond what is necessary for that purpose.
При приемане или изменяне на насоките, Комисията посочва какви действия е предприела по отношение на съответствието на тези насоки с правилата в трети страни, които представляват част от Европейската електроенергийна система.
When adopting or amending guidelines, the Commission shall indicate what actions it has taken with respect to the conformity of rules in third countries, which form part of the European electricity system, with the guidelines in question.
При приемането на тези насоки за пръв път, Комисията гарантира, че те обхващат в една проектомярка поне въпросите, посочени в параграф 1, букви а) и г) и параграф 2.“
When adopting these guidelines for the first time the Commission shall ensure that they cover in a single draft measure at least the issues referred to in paragraph 1(a) and (d), and paragraph 2."
Член 1 – точка 8 a (нова)
Article 1 – point 8 a (new)
(8а) Член 12, параграф 1 се замества със следното:
(8a) Article 12(1) shall be replaced by the following:
Без да се накърнява действието на параграф 2, държавите-членки гарантират, че националните регулаторни органи имат правомощията ефективно да гарантират спазването на настоящия регламент, като предоставят на тях или на други органи правната компетенция да издават изпълнителни разпоредби и да налагат ефективни, възпиращи и съразмерни наказания.
Without prejudice to paragraph 2, the Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities have the competence effectively to ensure compliance with this Regulation by providing them, o r other bodies, with the legal competence to issue compliance orders and to impose effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalties .
Държавите-членки уведомяват Комисията относно тези разпоредби най-късно до 1 януари 2010 г. и незабавно изпращат уведомление за всяко последващо изменение към въпросните разпоредби.
The Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by 1January 2010 at the latest and shall notify the Comm ission without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
(Промени във формулировката на член 12, параграф 1 на Регламент (ЕО) 1228/2003)
(Changes wording of paragraph 1, article 12 of Regulation (EC) 1228/2003)
According to the Council of European Energy Regulators, the current state of implementation of Regulation 1228/2003 shows shortcomings because of missing effective sanctions implemented by Member States.
According to the Council of European Energy Regulators, the current state of implementation of Regulation 1228/2003 shows shortcomings because of missing effective sanctions implemented by Member States.
Effective use of the enforcement powers of regulators should be ensured in order to sanction non-compliance with requirements of the Regulation.
Effective use of the enforcement powers of regulators should be ensured in order to sanction non-compliance with requirements of the Regulation.
The Rapporteur welcomes the third liberalisation package for the European Union’s energy markets as it offers, in his opinion, a complete and coherent legislative proposal in which the majority of the recommendations adopted by the European Parliament in June 2007 have been included in the proposals.
The Rapporteur welcomes the third liberalisation package for the European Union’s energy markets as it offers, in his opinion, a complete and coherent legislative proposal in which the majority of the recommendations adopted by the European Parliament in June 2007 have been included in the proposals.
In this sense, he agrees with the inclusion of stronger and more independent powers for the regulators, the increased requirements for transparency in the market, the improved framework for cooperation at European level between national regulators as well as between Transmission Systems Operators, the emphasis given to the further development of interconnection capacity between Member States and the proposal of ownership unbundling as the most effective, but not the only, mean to encourage investments and avoid discrimination towards new entrants.
In this sense, he agrees with the inclusion of stronger and more independent powers for the regulators, the increased requirements for transparency in the market, the improved framework for cooperation at European level between national regulators as well as between Transmission Systems Operators, the emphasis given to the further development of interconnection capacity between Member States and the proposal of ownership unbundling as the most effective, but not the only, mean to encourage investments and avoid discrimination towards new entrants.
He also shares the proposed creation of an Agency of European Regulators although he has reservations on the present structure and decision-making power of this new body.
He also shares the proposed creation of an Agency of European Regulators although he has reservations on the present structure and decision-making power of this new body.
Regarding the Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges, the Rapporteur thinks that the main problem with the legislative proposal lies in the current division of competences between the different actors which leads to a confused and somehow cumbersome decision-making process.
Regarding the Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges, the Rapporteur thinks that the main problem with the legislative proposal lies in the current division of competences between the different actors which leads to a confused and somehow cumbersome decision-making process.
This document will highlight the main concerns of the Rapporteur with regards to this particular proposal.
This document will highlight the main concerns of the Rapporteur with regards to this particular proposal.
Structure of responsibilities
Structure of responsibilities
As stated above, the Rapporteur considers that the key problem in this dossier is that the current structure of responsibilities presented in the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges does not correspond to the actual and natural division of competences at national level as the Transmission System Operators are given a quasi-regulatory status while the Regulatory Agency seems to be reduced to the role of an advisory body.
As stated above, the Rapporteur considers that the key problem in this dossier is that the current structure of responsibilities presented in the Commission’s proposal for a Regulation on the electricity cross-border exchanges does not correspond to the actual and natural division of competences at national level as the Transmission System Operators are given a quasi-regulatory status while the Regulatory Agency seems to be reduced to the role of an advisory body.
In particular, he believes that several of the eleven tasks that Transmission System Operators (TSOs) have to fulfil should be in the hands of the regulatory authorities instead.
In particular, he believes that several of the eleven tasks that Transmission System Operators (TSOs) have to fulfil should be in the hands of the regulatory authorities instead.
Indeed, while the Rapporteur shares the Commission’s idea of establishing a bottom-up approach in what regards the development of technical codes since the TSOs are best suited to do so and have a direct interest in simplifying and harmonising such rules at European level, he believes that other codes such as those relating to trading and market transparency should follow a different approach where the Agency, as an independent authority, should be responsible for drafting the guidelines in close cooperation with market participants and, needless to say, TSOs, and for adopting them.
Indeed, while the Rapporteur shares the Commission’s idea of establishing a bottom-up approach in what regards the development of technical codes since the TSOs are best suited to do so and have a direct interest in simplifying and harmonising such rules at European level, he believes that other codes such as those relating to trading and market transparency should follow a different approach where the Agency, as an independent authority, should be responsible for drafting the guidelines in close cooperation with market participants and, needless to say, TSOs, and for adopting them.
Furthermore, the voluntary nature of the implementation of the above mentioned codes and rules raises some questions as to whether there is any added value to the current system of TSO cooperation at European level.
Furthermore, the voluntary nature of the implementation of the above mentioned codes and rules raises some questions as to whether there is any added value to the current system of TSO cooperation at European level.
The Rapporteur firmly believes that some rules and codes that will derive from the implementation of this Regulation should have a compulsory nature.
The Rapporteur firmly believes that some rules and codes that will derive from the implementation of this Regulation should have a compulsory nature.
Finally, the Rapporteur thinks that, in line with the attribution to the Agency of drafting and adopting market codes, this regulatory authority should be in charge of carrying out the stakeholder consultation instead of the TSOs, according to the process carried out at national level.
Finally, the Rapporteur thinks that, in line with the attribution to the Agency of drafting and adopting market codes, this regulatory authority should be in charge of carrying out the stakeholder consultation instead of the TSOs, according to the process carried out at national level.
The Agency
The Agency
The Rapporteur is aware of the limitations the Commission’s legal service opinion has placed on the powers given to the Agency of European Regulators.
The Rapporteur is aware of the limitations the Commission’s legal service opinion has placed on the powers given to the Agency of European Regulators.
However, he is of the opinion that most of the uncertainties and confusion in the structure of powers derives precisely from this lack of competences.
However, he is of the opinion that most of the uncertainties and confusion in the structure of powers derives precisely from this lack of competences.
For this reason, the Rapporteur would like the Committee to ask the Parliament’s legal service to study whether the Agency’s powers could be extended to be able to deliver final regulatory decisions, in accordance with the European Parliament’s resolution of June 2007 on the liberalisation of the energy markets.
For this reason, the Rapporteur would like the Committee to ask the Parliament’s legal service to study whether the Agency’s powers could be extended to be able to deliver final regulatory decisions, in accordance with the European Parliament’s resolution of June 2007 on the liberalisation of the energy markets.
Should that not be possible, then the Rapporteur believes that Parliament should reflect on whether the proposed model would answer the problems to reach a common view that arise at present between national regulators and if it could be acceptable as an intermediary step towards a true European Regulator.
Should that not be possible, then the Rapporteur believes that Parliament should reflect on whether the proposed model would answer the problems to reach a common view that arise at present between national regulators and if it could be acceptable as an intermediary step towards a true European Regulator.
The European Parliament expressed in the recent past its wish to establish a European body of national regulators that would be granted decision-making powers for cross-border issues between Member States while the national regulators would remain responsible for decisions of matters within their national territory.
The European Parliament expressed in the recent past its wish to establish a European body of national regulators that would be granted decision-making powers for cross-border issues between Member States while the national regulators would remain responsible for decisions of matters within their national territory.
The Parliament's position intended to put an end to the situations of deadlock between national regulators we see at the present time; that is why the Commission's proposal as it stands today does give the Agency the competence of solving this current and potential difficulties.
The Parliament's position intended to put an end to the situations of deadlock between national regulators we see at the present time; that is why the Commission's proposal as it stands today does give the Agency the competence of solving this current and potential difficulties.
The Rapporteur believes that an independent Agency, with the adequate competences for cross border issues, would promote the development of a true EU energy regulation, more efficiently and with more transparency.
The Rapporteur believes that an independent Agency, with the adequate competences for cross border issues, would promote the development of a true EU energy regulation, more efficiently and with more transparency.
The Rapporteur is also concerned by the dissolution of the existing ERGEG and the implications it might have in terms of independence since the Agency as currently proposed will be excessively dependent on the European Commission.
The Rapporteur is also concerned by the dissolution of the existing ERGEG and the implications it might have in terms of independence since the Agency as currently proposed will be excessively dependent on the European Commission.