natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In contrary to the above-mentioned subjects, where several modifications were suggested, your rapporteur firmly believes that in the case of intra-Community air services the proposed extension of Commission competence should be supported.
In contrary to the above-mentioned subjects, where several modifications were suggested, your rapporteur firmly believes that in the case of intra-Community air services the proposed extension of Commission competence should be supported.
1st and 5th freedom rights can be negotiated more efficiently by the Commission than by the Member States separately, what is also demonstrated by the agreement with Russia concerning Siberian overflight rights.
1st and 5th freedom rights can be negotiated more efficiently by the Commission than by the Member States separately, what is also demonstrated by the agreement with Russia concerning Siberian overflight rights.
Your rapporteur does not share the doubts of some stakeholders concerning subsidiarity.
Your rapporteur does not share the doubts of some stakeholders concerning subsidiarity.
Therefore it is suggested accepting Article 15 as it is proposed by the Commission.
Therefore it is suggested accepting Article 15 as it is proposed by the Commission.
Common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community (recast)
Common rules for the operation of air transport services in the Community (recast)
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard
Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Michael Cramer, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Willi Piecyk, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard
Zsolt László Becsey, Pedro Guerreiro, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Salvatore Tatarella, Ari Vatanen, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Zsolt László Becsey, Pedro Guerreiro, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Salvatore Tatarella, Ari Vatanen, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Den Dover, Béla Glattfelder
Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Den Dover, Béla Glattfelder
относно съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно финансовия инструмент за околната среда (LIFE+)
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+)
(PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD))
(PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD))
Делегация на Европейския парламент в помирителния комитет
European Parliament delegation to the Conciliation Committee
Председател на делегацията:
Delegation chairwoman:
PE 386.718v02-00
PE 386.718v02-00
за съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно финансовия инструмент за околната среда (LIFE+)
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+)
(PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD) )
(PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD) )
(Процедура на съвместно вземане на решение: трето четене)
(Codecision procedure: third reading)
– като взе предвид съвместния проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет (PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 ),
– като взе предвид промененото предложение на Комисията ( COM(2004)0621 /2)
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0621 /2)
– като взе предвид своята позиция на второ четене
– having regard to its position at second reading
Одобрени текстове от 24.10.2006 г., P6_TA(2006)0431 . по общата позиция на Съвета
Texts Adopted, 24.10.2006, P6_TA(2006)0431 . on the Council common position
– като взе предвид становището на Комисията по измененията в общата позиция, внесени от Парламента ( COM(2006)0759 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2006)0759 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 5 от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 251(5) of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 65 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rule 65 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на своята делегация в помирителния комитет ( A6‑0180/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0180/2007 ),
3. възлага на своя генерален секретар да подпише акта след проверка на надлежното изпълнение на всички процедури и да пристъпи към публикуването му заедно с генералния секретар на Съвета в ОВ на ЕО;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
The Aim of the Regulation concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+), which is based on Article 175(1) of the Treaty, is to introduce a single financial instrument targeting the environment to support in particular the priorities of the 6th Environment Action Programme.
The Aim of the Regulation concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+), which is based on Article 175(1) of the Treaty, is to introduce a single financial instrument targeting the environment to support in particular the priorities of the 6th Environment Action Programme.
This programme, which will run from 2007 until 2013, will cover most of the ongoing programmes currently managed by DG Environment, such as the LIFE III programme, the sustainable urban development programme, the NGO programme and Forest Focus in a streamlined and simplified manner.
This programme, which will run from 2007 until 2013, will cover most of the ongoing programmes currently managed by DG Environment, such as the LIFE III programme, the sustainable urban development programme, the NGO programme and Forest Focus in a streamlined and simplified manner.
The Parliament held its first reading on 7 July 2005: Council adopted its common position on 27 June 2006.
The Parliament held its first reading on 7 July 2005: Council adopted its common position on 27 June 2006.
At second reading, on 24 October 2006, the Parliament adopted 31 amendments to the Council's common position.
At second reading, on 24 October 2006, the Parliament adopted 31 amendments to the Council's common position.
Most of the Parliament's 31 second-reading amendments were related to the management of LIFE+ budget which was also the most controversial issue.
Most of the Parliament's 31 second-reading amendments were related to the management of LIFE+ budget which was also the most controversial issue.
The Council Common position proposed a system of delegated management of the Programme, under which 80% for the funds were to be managed by Members States.
The Council Common position proposed a system of delegated management of the Programme, under which 80% for the funds were to be managed by Members States.
The EP insisted on the central role of the Commission and therefore supported a system of central management.
The EP insisted on the central role of the Commission and therefore supported a system of central management.
Other issues at stake between Parliament and Council concerned mainly budgetary questions (including the financing of Natura 2000), the introduction of the new Comitology procedure, and the measures eligible for funding.
Other issues at stake between Parliament and Council concerned mainly budgetary questions (including the financing of Natura 2000), the introduction of the new Comitology procedure, and the measures eligible for funding.
The Conciliation procedure
The Conciliation procedure
The Council subsequently indicated informally that it would be unable to accept all of the Parliament's amendments and that consequently a conciliation procedure would be necessary.
The Council subsequently indicated informally that it would be unable to accept all of the Parliament's amendments and that consequently a conciliation procedure would be necessary.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 28 November 2006 in Brussels.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 28 November 2006 in Brussels.
Three trialogues were held (on 1 February, 13 February and 1 March), with the negotiating team reporting back to the EP delegation (on 13 February and 15 March).
Three trialogues were held (on 1 February, 13 February and 1 March), with the negotiating team reporting back to the EP delegation (on 13 February and 15 March).
During this first phase of negotiations, the Council accepted the EP position on central direct management.
During this first phase of negotiations, the Council accepted the EP position on central direct management.
Reasonable progress was made on other issues such as the possibility for Member States to set national priorities, public participation and some technical provisions.
Reasonable progress was made on other issues such as the possibility for Member States to set national priorities, public participation and some technical provisions.
However, other key points of difference remained unresolved, namely: the total budget, implementation of the budget, the proportion of the budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects, and the need to enhance transnational cooperation projects.
However, other key points of difference remained unresolved, namely: the total budget, implementation of the budget, the proportion of the budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects, and the need to enhance transnational cooperation projects.
The Conciliation Committee met in the evening of 27 March 2007.
The Conciliation Committee met in the evening of 27 March 2007.
Shortly before midnight, the Committee was able to reach a final agreement after the delegation of the European Parliament had accepted unanimously the proposed compromise package.
Shortly before midnight, the Committee was able to reach a final agreement after the delegation of the European Parliament had accepted unanimously the proposed compromise package.
The key points of the agreement reached may be summarised as follows:
The key points of the agreement reached may be summarised as follows:
LIFE+ total budget: The EP succeeded in securing an increase of EUR 40 million above the amount provided for in the Council Common Position.
LIFE+ total budget: The EP succeeded in securing an increase of EUR 40 million above the amount provided for in the Council Common Position.
The budget for LIFE+ has now been set at some 1894million Euro.
The budget for LIFE+ has now been set at some 1894million Euro.
Implementation of the LIFE+ budget: The Council had proposed that 79% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions, leaving the Commission 1% for other expenses.
Implementation of the LIFE+ budget: The Council had proposed that 79% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions, leaving the Commission 1% for other expenses.
The EP insisted on the need to provide the Commission with the necessary resources to finance the administrative expenditure for the project selection procedure as well as for other relevant activities, such as information and awareness campaigns and Green Weeks.
The EP insisted on the need to provide the Commission with the necessary resources to finance the administrative expenditure for the project selection procedure as well as for other relevant activities, such as information and awareness campaigns and Green Weeks.
It was finally agreed that 78% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions and the Commission will be provided with 2% of the budget for other expenses.
It was finally agreed that 78% of the budgetary resources for LIFE+ will be used for project actions and the Commission will be provided with 2% of the budget for other expenses.
Proportion of the LIFE+ budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects: The EP has ensured that at least 50% of the budget resources of LIFE+ will be dedicated to project action grants for measures to support the conservation of nature and biodiversity.
Proportion of the LIFE+ budget dedicated to "nature and biodiversity" projects: The EP has ensured that at least 50% of the budget resources of LIFE+ will be dedicated to project action grants for measures to support the conservation of nature and biodiversity.
In its common position, the Council had proposed dedicating 40% of the whole budget to such projects.
In its common position, the Council had proposed dedicating 40% of the whole budget to such projects.
Trans-national projects: The EP secured inclusion in the Regulation of a special provision that at least 15% of the budgetary resources of LIFE+ should be allocated to trans-national projects.
Trans-national projects: The EP secured inclusion in the Regulation of a special provision that at least 15% of the budgetary resources of LIFE+ should be allocated to trans-national projects.
The Council had opposed this provision.
The Council had opposed this provision.
During the Conciliation Committee meeting, Mr Dimas read out a declaration that, before the review of the Financial Framework, the Commission will undertake a review of committed and planned spending, both at national and EU level, on the management of the Natura 2000 networks.
During the Conciliation Committee meeting, Mr Dimas read out a declaration that, before the review of the Financial Framework, the Commission will undertake a review of committed and planned spending, both at national and EU level, on the management of the Natura 2000 networks.
This overview will be used with a view to adapting community instruments, in particular LIFE+, and to ensuring a high level of co-financing.
This overview will be used with a view to adapting community instruments, in particular LIFE+, and to ensuring a high level of co-financing.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure addresses the key issues covered by the Parliament's second-reading amendments.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure addresses the key issues covered by the Parliament's second-reading amendments.
It is also much more satisfactory than any agreement which could have been concluded at an earlier stage of the legislative procedure.
It is also much more satisfactory than any agreement which could have been concluded at an earlier stage of the legislative procedure.
In particular, the EP succeeded in ensuring that the European Commission will remain the key player in the management of the programme.
In particular, the EP succeeded in ensuring that the European Commission will remain the key player in the management of the programme.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approve the joint text at third reading.
The delegation accordingly recommends that Parliament approve the joint text at third reading.
Съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно финансовия инструмент за околната среда (LIFE+)
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+)
PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD)
PE-CONS 3611/2007 – C6‑0105/2007 – 2004/0218(COD)
Председател на делегацията: заместник-председател
Delegation chairwoman: Vice-President
Водеща комисия Председател :
Committee responsible Chairman:
Предложение за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно финансовия инструмент за околната среда (LIFE+)– COM(2004)0621 – C6‑0127/2004
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) – COM(2004)0621 – C6‑0127/2004
Дата на първото четене в ЕП – Номер P
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
Обща позиция на Съвета Дата на обявяване в заседание
Council common position Date announced in plenary
Дата на получаване на втория прочит от Съвета
Date Council received 2nd reading
Дата на писмото на Съвета относно неодобрението на измененията, внесени от Парламента
Date of Council letter on non-approval of Parliament amendments
Съвещания на помирителния комитет
Conciliation Committee meetings
Дата на гласуване на делегацията на ЕП
Date of vote by Parliament delegation
Резултат от гласуването
Result of vote
Присъстващи членове
Members present
Chris Davies, Edite Estrela, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Jutta Haug, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Riitta Myller, Hartmut Nassauer, Miroslav Ouzký, Antonyia Parvanova, Frédérique Ries, Karin Scheele, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Evangelia Tzampazi, Lambert van Nistelrooij.
Chris Davies, Edite Estrela, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Jutta Haug, Gyula Hegyi, Mary Honeyball, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Riitta Myller, Hartmut Nassauer, Miroslav Ouzký, Antonyia Parvanova, Frédérique Ries, Karin Scheele, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Evangelia Tzampazi, Lambert van Nistelrooij.
Avril Doyle, Anne Ferreira.
Avril Doyle, Anne Ferreira.
Дата на споразумението в помирителния комитет
Date of agreement in Conciliation Committee
Споразумение чрез размяна на п исма
Agreement by exchange of letters
Дата на констатиране от съпредседателите на одобрението на съвместния проект и на предаването му на ЕП и на Съвета
Date on which the co-chairmen established that the joint text had been approved and forwarded it to Parliament and the Council
УДЪЛЖАВАНЕ НА СРОКОВЕ
EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Срок за второ четене на Съвета
Deadline for second reading by Council
Срок за свикване на комисията Институция, поискала удължаването – дата
Deadline for convening the Committee Requesting institution – date
Срок за работа в комисия Институция, поискала удължаването – дата
Deadline for work in the Committee Requesting institution – date
Срок за приемане на акта
Deadline for adopting the act
Институция, поискала удължаването – дата
Requesting institution – date
PE 384.498v02-00
PE 384.498v02-00
за предложението за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент на Съвета (ЕО) №577/98 относно организацията на извадково изследване на работната сила в Общността
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2006)0565 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0565 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 285, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0326/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0326/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по заетост и социални въпроси ( A6‑0181/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0181/2007 ),
(4а) Мерките, необходими за прилагането на Регламент (ЕО) № 577/98 на Съвета относно организацията на извадково изследване на работната сила в Общността 1 , следва да бъдат приети в съответствие с Решение 1999/468/ЕО на Съвета от 28 юни 1999 относно установяване на условията и реда за упражняване на изпълнителните правомощия, предоставени на Комисията 2 .
(4a) The measures necessary for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 577/98 on the organisation of a labour force sample survey in the Community 1 should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission 2 .
1 ОВ L 77, 14.3.1998 г., стр.3.
1 OJ L 77, 14.3.1998, p.3.
Регламент, последно изменен с Регламент (ЕО) № 2257/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета (OВ L 336, 23.12.2003 г., стp.6).
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2257/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 336, 23.12.2003, p.6).
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 A (нова)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 A (new)
Член 4, параграф 2, алинея 2, уводна част (Регламент (EО) № 577/98)
Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2, introductory part (Regulation (EC) No 577/98)
В член 4, параграф 2, алинея втора уводната част се заменя със следния текст:
In Article 4, paragraph 2, the introductory part of subparagraph 2 shall be replaced by the following:
„Ежегодно се изготвя програма от ad hoc модули, обхващаща няколко години, в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране, определена в член 8, параграф 2:“
"A programme of ad hoc modules covering several years shall be laid down annually in accordance with the regulatory procedure specified in Article 8(2):"
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 Б (нова)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 B (new)
Член 4, параграф 3 (Регламент (EО) № 577/98)
Article 4, paragraph 3 (Regulation (EC) No 577/98)
В член 4, параграф 3 се заменя със следния текст:
In Article 4, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
Определенията,правилата за редактиране, които трябва да се използват, кодификацията на променливите, адаптирането на списъка с променливи за изследването, които са станали необходими в резултат на развитието на техниките и концепциите, както и списък с принципи за формулиране на въпросите относно трудовия статус, се определят в съответствие с процедурата по регулиране, определена в член 8, параграф 2.“
The definitions, edits to be used, codification of variables, adjustment of the list of survey variables made necessary by the evolution of techniques and concepts, and a list of principles for the formulation of the questions concerning the labour status, shall be laid down in accordance with the regulatory procedure specified in Article 8(2)."
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 2
ARTICLE 1, POINT 2
Данните, съответстващи в изследването на характеристиката „възнаграждение от основната работа“, могат да се изпращат на Евростат до двадесет и един месеца от изтичането на референтния период, когато за предоставяне на тази информация се използват административни данни.“
Data corresponding to the survey characteristic 'wages from the main job' can be forwarded to Eurostat within twenty-one months of the end of the reference period when administrative data are used to supply this information.
Jan Andersson, Alexandru Athanasiu, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Roger Helmer, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Jean Lambert, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner
Jan Andersson, Alexandru Athanasiu, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Roger Helmer, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jan Jerzy Kułakowski, Jean Lambert, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner
PE 380.869v03-00
PE 380.869v03-00