natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Furthermore, if a speech has anyway been translated, as is often the case for speeches at solemn sessions or statements by European Council Presidents, it should also be made available on the internet.
Furthermore, if a speech has anyway been translated, as is often the case for speeches at solemn sessions or statements by European Council Presidents, it should also be made available on the internet.
Finally, the Bureau should monitor technological developments and see whether a computer-translation could be useful, at least to provide a rough idea of the content of speeches which could be useful for electronic searches using key words, where researchers can verify quickly whether they wish to look at the video.
Finally, the Bureau should monitor technological developments and see whether a computer-translation could be useful, at least to provide a rough idea of the content of speeches which could be useful for electronic searches using key words, where researchers can verify quickly whether they wish to look at the video.
The Bureau should be assigned explicitly in the Rules the task of laying down implementing rules and it should monitor closely whether the new regime meets the needs and expectations of the public and produce, possibly in the context of the review of Rule 139 foreseen before the end of the legislative period an evaluation.
The Bureau should be assigned explicitly in the Rules the task of laying down implementing rules and it should monitor closely whether the new regime meets the needs and expectations of the public and produce, possibly in the context of the review of Rule 139 foreseen before the end of the legislative period an evaluation.
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski, Dushana Zdravkova,
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski, Dushana Zdravkova,
Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Klaus Hänsch, Alain Lamassoure, Stavros Lambrinidis, Gérard Onesta, Georgios Papastamkos, Bernard Poignant, György Schöpflin, Kathy Sinnott, Alexander Stubb, Mauro Zani
Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Klaus Hänsch, Alain Lamassoure, Stavros Lambrinidis, Gérard Onesta, Georgios Papastamkos, Bernard Poignant, György Schöpflin, Kathy Sinnott, Alexander Stubb, Mauro Zani
за изменение на член 23 от Правилника за дейността на Европейския парламент относно състава на Председателския съвет
on amendment of Rule 23 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure on the composition of the Conference of Presidents
PE 388.646v03-00
PE 388.646v03-00
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ НА ПРАВИЛНИКА ЗА ДЕЙНОСТТА НА ПАРЛАМЕНТА (B6-0039/2007) 7
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT’S RULES OF PROCEDURE (B6-0039/2007) 7
– като взе предвид предложението за изменение на своя правилник ( B6‑0039/2007 ),
– having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure ( B6‑0039/2007 ),
– като взе предвид член 202 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rule 202 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по конституционни въпроси ( A6‑0355/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0355/2007 ),
Член 23, параграф 2
Rule 23, paragraph 2
There is no justification for the non-attached Members to be overrepresented in comparison with the regularly constituted political groups.
There is no justification for the non-attached Members to be overrepresented in comparison with the regularly constituted political groups.
ИЗЛ0ЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
ON THE PROCEDURE
ON THE PROCEDURE
By letter of 23 February 2007, the European Parliament's President has forwarded to the Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs a proposal for an amendment to Rule 23 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure submitted by Mr Corbett.
By letter of 23 February 2007, the European Parliament's President has forwarded to the Chairman of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs a proposal for an amendment to Rule 23 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure submitted by Mr Corbett.
This Rule relates to the composition of the Conference of Presidents and in particular as regards the representation of non-attached Members, who - under the present provisions - can delegate two of their number to attend the Conference, but without having the right to vote.
This Rule relates to the composition of the Conference of Presidents and in particular as regards the representation of non-attached Members, who - under the present provisions - can delegate two of their number to attend the Conference, but without having the right to vote.
Mr Corbett's proposal reads as follows:
Mr Corbett's proposal reads as follows:
Rule 23
Rule 23
Composition of the Conference of Presidents
Composition of the Conference of Presidents
The non-attached Members shall delegate two of their number to attend meetings of the Conference of Presidents, without having the right to vote.
The non-attached Members shall delegate two of their number to attend meetings of the Conference of Presidents, without having the right to vote.
23.2 The non-attached Members shall delegate one of their number on the basis of a monthly rotation to attend, without having the right to vote, meetings of the Conference of Presidents in so far as these meetings determine the plenary agenda and/or items directly related to the position and rights of individual Members.
23.2 The non-attached Members shall delegate one of their number on the basis of a monthly rotation to attend, without having the right to vote, meetings of the Conference of Presidents in so far as these meetings determine the plenary agenda and/or items directly related to the position and rights of individual Members.
Mr Corbett argues that, due to the drastic reduction in number of the non-attached Members, who have become even less numerous (14) than the minimum number required to form a political group (20), there is no justification any more for them to be represented by two members, who - in any case - due to the nature of their grouping do not represent each other in political terms.
Mr Corbett argues that, due to the drastic reduction in number of the non-attached Members, who have become even less numerous (14) than the minimum number required to form a political group (20), there is no justification any more for them to be represented by two members, who - in any case - due to the nature of their grouping do not represent each other in political terms.
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE RAPPORTEUR
CONSIDERATIONS OF THE RAPPORTEUR
By comparison with the other groups, and irrespective of the number of Members involved, the degree of heterogeneity among the non-attached Members is very marked.
By comparison with the other groups, and irrespective of the number of Members involved, the degree of heterogeneity among the non-attached Members is very marked.
Nevertheless, the differing views held by the non-attached Members could perfectly well be put forward in the Conference of Presidents by one representative.
Nevertheless, the differing views held by the non-attached Members could perfectly well be put forward in the Conference of Presidents by one representative.
However, the number of non-attached Members can also increase at any time as a result of unforeseen events.
However, the number of non-attached Members can also increase at any time as a result of unforeseen events.
The determining factors are the degree of political coherence within the existing groups or the ability of the non-attached Members to reach agreement in cases where the numerical criteria governing the formation of a group have been met.
The determining factors are the degree of political coherence within the existing groups or the ability of the non-attached Members to reach agreement in cases where the numerical criteria governing the formation of a group have been met.
In legal terms, therefore, the provisions of the Rules of Procedure governing the composition of the Conference of Presidents should not be tailored exclusively to a situation in which there is a small number of non-attached Members.
In legal terms, therefore, the provisions of the Rules of Procedure governing the composition of the Conference of Presidents should not be tailored exclusively to a situation in which there is a small number of non-attached Members.
In addition, your rapporteur wishes to emphasise that the situation of the non-attached Members differs from that of Members who belong to a group in two respects.
In addition, your rapporteur wishes to emphasise that the situation of the non-attached Members differs from that of Members who belong to a group in two respects.
- Whereas the latter are linked by their shared political allegiance, the non-attached Members will generally be much more disparate in their political convictions.
- Whereas the latter are linked by their shared political allegiance, the non-attached Members will generally be much more disparate in their political convictions.
In other words, in their case the reason justifying the arrangement whereby members of a group as it were collectively take part in the work of the Conference of Presidents through a single representative, in the person of the group chairman, is lacking.
In other words, in their case the reason justifying the arrangement whereby members of a group as it were collectively take part in the work of the Conference of Presidents through a single representative, in the person of the group chairman, is lacking.
- On the other hand, the need for the EP to function effectively as a body and the greater political influence wielded by group members by comparison with the numerically much smaller, heterogeneous grouping of non-attached Members make working arrangements which reflect these factors, as introduced in connection with the right to vote, essential.
- On the other hand, the need for the EP to function effectively as a body and the greater political influence wielded by group members by comparison with the numerically much smaller, heterogeneous grouping of non-attached Members make working arrangements which reflect these factors, as introduced in connection with the right to vote, essential.
However, in practical terms this should not deter the non-attached Members from contributing to the decision-making process by at least putting forward effective arguments in support of their views.
However, in practical terms this should not deter the non-attached Members from contributing to the decision-making process by at least putting forward effective arguments in support of their views.
The Rules of Procedure consist of a body of provisions which are intended to remain in force over time and which must not only produce effective results as soon as they are enacted or amended, but also be flexible enough to accommodate future changes to the make-up of Parliament.
The Rules of Procedure consist of a body of provisions which are intended to remain in force over time and which must not only produce effective results as soon as they are enacted or amended, but also be flexible enough to accommodate future changes to the make-up of Parliament.
New sets of circumstances which may change at any time, in particular by reverting to the status quo ante, should not therefore prompt the adoption of new rules which are tailored precisely to those new circumstances, but would be less appropriate if they were to revert to what they were before or change again
New sets of circumstances which may change at any time, in particular by reverting to the status quo ante, should not therefore prompt the adoption of new rules which are tailored precisely to those new circumstances, but would be less appropriate if they were to revert to what they were before or change again
Rotation principle
Rotation principle
Another question is whether it is appropriate or not to specify that the non-attached representation should be on the basis of a monthly rotation among their members.
Another question is whether it is appropriate or not to specify that the non-attached representation should be on the basis of a monthly rotation among their members.
There is, however, no obvious reason to disrupt the continuity of representation of the non-attached Members in the Conference of Presidents by introducing a rotation system which does not apply to the group chairmen.
There is, however, no obvious reason to disrupt the continuity of representation of the non-attached Members in the Conference of Presidents by introducing a rotation system which does not apply to the group chairmen.
This would work to the detriment of the non-attached Members by hampering their ability to advocate any firm standpoints they might have in the Conference of Presidents and to make their views heard consistently.
This would work to the detriment of the non-attached Members by hampering their ability to advocate any firm standpoints they might have in the Conference of Presidents and to make their views heard consistently.
In the final analysis, there is no overriding reason for incorporating into the Rules of Procedure complicated provisions governing a rotating system of representation for the non-attached Members.
In the final analysis, there is no overriding reason for incorporating into the Rules of Procedure complicated provisions governing a rotating system of representation for the non-attached Members.
If they so wish, the latter can reach agreement on an informal arrangement of this kind.
If they so wish, the latter can reach agreement on an informal arrangement of this kind.
Restrictions on attendance at certain meetings
Restrictions on attendance at certain meetings
It is also proposed to limit the non-attached representative's attendance at the Conference of Presidents only in so far as it deals with Parliament's agenda or discusses matters directly involving the rights of individual Members.
It is also proposed to limit the non-attached representative's attendance at the Conference of Presidents only in so far as it deals with Parliament's agenda or discusses matters directly involving the rights of individual Members.
However, the powers of the Conference of Presidents cover a series of matters which have a major bearing on the work of the non-attached Members as well, for example Rules 24(2), (5), (7) and (8) and 45 of the Rules of Procedure.
However, the powers of the Conference of Presidents cover a series of matters which have a major bearing on the work of the non-attached Members as well, for example Rules 24(2), (5), (7) and (8) and 45 of the Rules of Procedure.
For that reason, the inclusion of non-attached Members in the composition of the Conference of Presidents makes sense.
For that reason, the inclusion of non-attached Members in the composition of the Conference of Presidents makes sense.
Since your rapporteur is not aware of any real problem that full attendance at Conference of Presidents' meetings by the non-attached Members' representatives would have caused to date, he is of the opinion that the present provisions in this respect should remain as they are, in a spirit of transparency and maximum involvement of all Members in the running of Parliament.
Since your rapporteur is not aware of any real problem that full attendance at Conference of Presidents' meetings by the non-attached Members' representatives would have caused to date, he is of the opinion that the present provisions in this respect should remain as they are, in a spirit of transparency and maximum involvement of all Members in the running of Parliament.
If the non-attached Members do not wish to attend certain meetings, then that is their right.
If the non-attached Members do not wish to attend certain meetings, then that is their right.
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ НА ПРАВИЛНИКА ЗА ДЕЙНОСТТА НА ПАРЛАМЕНТА( B6-0039/2007 )
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF PARLIAMENT’S RULES OF PROCEDURE( B6-0039/2007 )
by Richard Corbett
by Richard Corbett
Amendment of Rule 23(2)
Amendment of Rule 23(2)
Rule 23, paragraph 2
Rule 23, paragraph 2
The Non-attached Members shall delegate two of their number to attend meetings of the Conference of Presidents, without having the right to vote.
The Non-attached Members shall delegate two of their number to attend meetings of the Conference of Presidents, without having the right to vote.
The Non-attached Members shall delegate one of their number on the basis of a monthly rotation to attend, without having the right to vote, meetings of the Conference of Presidents in so far as these meetings determine the plenary agenda and/or items directly related to the position and rights of individual Members .
The Non-attached Members shall delegate one of their number on the basis of a monthly rotation to attend, without having the right to vote, meetings of the Conference of Presidents in so far as these meetings determine the plenary agenda and/or items directly related to the position and rights of individual Members .
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski, Dushana Zdravkova
Jim Allister, Enrique Barón Crespo, Jens-Peter Bonde, Richard Corbett, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Ingo Friedrich, Bronisław Geremek, Genowefa Grabowska, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Adrian Severin, József Szájer, Riccardo Ventre, Johannes Voggenhuber, Bernard Wojciechowski, Dushana Zdravkova
относно инициативата на Федерална република Германия и Френската република с оглед приемане на рамково решение на Съвета относно признаването и надзора над присъди с отложено изпълнение, алтернативни санкции и условни присъди
on the initiative of the Federal Republic of Germany and of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
Maria da Assunção Esteves
Maria da Assunção Esteves ,
PE 391.992v02-00
PE 391.992v02-00
ПРОЕКТ НА ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛНА РЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ Error!
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.....................................4
Bookmark not defined.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................29
относно инициативата на Федерална република Германия и Френската република с оглед приемане на рамково решение на Съвета относно признаването и надзора над присъди с отложено изпълнение, алтернативни санкции и условни присъди
on the initiative by the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
– като взе предвид инициативата на Федерална република Германия и Френската република (6480/2007),
– having regard to the initiative by the Federal Republic of Germany and of the French Republic (6480/2007)
– като взе предвид член 39, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕС, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6-0129/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0129/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6-0356/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0356/2007 ),
Текст, предложен от Федерална република Германия и Френската република
Text proposed by the Federal Republic of Germany and by the French Republic
Инициатива на Федерална република Германия и Френската република с оглед приемане на рамково решение на Съвета относно признаването и надзора на присъди с отложено изпълнение, алтернативни санкции и условни присъди
Initiative of the Federal Republic of Germany and of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
Инициатива на Федерална република Германия и Френската република с оглед приемане на рамково решение на Съвета относно признаването, надзора и изпълнението на присъди с отложено изпълнение, алтернативни санкции и условни присъди
Initiative of the Federal Republic of Germany and of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision on the recognition , supervision and execution of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
The scope of the Framework Decision covers the supervision of suspensory measures and alternative sanctions and also other decisions relating to the execution of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences - an idea which is accurately summarised by the proposed wording 'supervision and execution'.
The scope of the Framework Decision covers the supervision of suspensory measures and alternative sanctions and also other decisions relating to the execution of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences - an idea which is accurately summarised by the proposed wording 'supervision and execution'.
(5) Настоящото рамково решение спазва основните права и е съобразено с принципите, признати в член 6 от Договора за Европейския съюз, които са изразени и в Хартата на Европейския съюз за основните права, по-специално в глава VІ от нея.
(5) This Framework Decision respects fundamental rights and adheres to the principles recognised in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, which are also expressed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially in Chapter VI thereof.
Нито една разпоредба от настоящото рамково решение не следва да се тълкува като забраняваща отказа от признаване на присъда и/или надзор над отлагаща мярка или алтернативна санкция, ако има обективни данни, че отлагащата мярка или алтернативната санкция е наложена, за да накаже лицето заради неговия или нейния пол, раса, религия, етнически произход, националност, език, политически убеждения или сексуална ориентация или че това лице може да е в неравностойно положение поради някоя от тези причини.
No provision of this Framework Decision should be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to recognise a judgment and/or supervise a suspensory measure or alternative sanction if there are objective indications that the suspensory measure or alternative sanction was imposed to punish a person because of his or her sex, race, religion, ethnic origin, nationality, language, political convictions or sexual orientation or that this person might be disadvantaged for one of these reasons.
Нито една разпоредба от настоящото рамково решение не следва да се тълкува като забраняваща отказа от признаване на присъда и/или надзор над отлагаща мярка или алтернативна санкция, ако има обективни данни, че отлагащата мярка или алтернативната санкция е наложена при явно и неприемливо нарушение на основните права, определени в договорите на Европейския съюз.
No provision of this Framework Decision should be interpreted as prohibiting refusal to recognise a judgment and/or supervise a suspensory measure or alternative sanction if there are objective indications that the suspensory measure or alternative sanction was imposed in clear and unacceptable infringement of the fundamental rights laid down in the European Union Treaties .