natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
В. като има предвид, че целта на проекта на коригиращ бюджет № 4/2007 е тези бюджетни средства да бъдат официално записани в бюджета за 2007 г.,
C. whereas the purpose of Draft amending budget No 4/2007 is to formally enter these budgetary resources into the 2007 budget,
The purpose of the present Draft Amending Budget 4/2007 (presented by the Commission as PDAB 3/2007) is to set the necessary budgetary structure and allocations to allow for the financing of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation in 2007.
The purpose of the present Draft Amending Budget 4/2007 (presented by the Commission as PDAB 3/2007) is to set the necessary budgetary structure and allocations to allow for the financing of the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation in 2007.
The present Amending Budget further foresees modifications to the budget structure as a result of the extension of the mandate of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture; and the modification of the establishment plans of three other agencies: Eurojust, the European Agency for Fundamental Rights and Frontex.
The present Amending Budget further foresees modifications to the budget structure as a result of the extension of the mandate of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture; and the modification of the establishment plans of three other agencies: Eurojust, the European Agency for Fundamental Rights and Frontex.
A) Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation
A) Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation
The following new budget items have to be created:
The following new budget items have to be created:
– 02 01 04 30 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme
– 02 01 04 30 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme
– 06 01 04 32 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Marco Polo II Programme
– 06 01 04 32 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Marco Polo II Programme
The title of the existing budget item 06 01 04 30 will be amended as follows:
The title of the existing budget item 06 01 04 30 will be amended as follows:
– 06 01 04 30 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – 'Intelligent Energy – Europe' Programme
– 06 01 04 30 – Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation – Subsidy from the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – 'Intelligent Energy – Europe' Programme
The allocations of the following budget items will accordingly be adjusted:
The allocations of the following budget items will accordingly be adjusted:
– 02 01 04 04 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme – Expenditure on administrative management
– 02 01 04 04 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme – Expenditure on administrative management
– 02 02 01 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme
– 02 02 01 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme – Entrepreneurship and Innovation Programme
– 06 02 06 – Marco Polo II Programme
– 06 02 06 – Marco Polo II Programme
– 06 04 06 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme 'Intelligent Energy – Europe' Programme
– 06 04 06 – Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme 'Intelligent Energy – Europe' Programme
In 2007, the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation will have a staff of 35 statutory agents in its establishment plan, of which 11 seconded officials from the Commission; the statutory staff of the current Intelligent Energy Executive Agency is 16 temporary agents, of which 5 are seconded officials from the Commission.
In 2007, the Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation will have a staff of 35 statutory agents in its establishment plan, of which 11 seconded officials from the Commission; the statutory staff of the current Intelligent Energy Executive Agency is 16 temporary agents, of which 5 are seconded officials from the Commission.
b) Modification of the budget structure of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA)
b) Modification of the budget structure of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA)
The mandate of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA) was extended by Commission Decision 2007/114/EC of 8 February 2007, to include the management of the Youth, and Erasmus Mundus programmes in which IPA (Instrument for Pre-Accession) beneficiaries are involved.
The mandate of the Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture (EACEA) was extended by Commission Decision 2007/114/EC of 8 February 2007, to include the management of the Youth, and Erasmus Mundus programmes in which IPA (Instrument for Pre-Accession) beneficiaries are involved.
In order to accommodate this change within the budget structure, it is now proposed to create the following item in budget 2007:
In order to accommodate this change within the budget structure, it is now proposed to create the following item in budget 2007:
– 22 01 04 30 Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture — Subsidy for programmes of heading 4 in the enlargement policy.
– 22 01 04 30 Executive Agency for Education, Audiovisual and Culture — Subsidy for programmes of heading 4 in the enlargement policy.
c) Modification of the establishment plan of Eurojust
c) Modification of the establishment plan of Eurojust
In the European Union budget for 2007, the budgetary authority amended the amount for Eurojust, increasing it to EUR 18,4 million compared with the EUR 17 million which had been entered in the preliminary draft budget.
In the European Union budget for 2007, the budgetary authority amended the amount for Eurojust, increasing it to EUR 18,4 million compared with the EUR 17 million which had been entered in the preliminary draft budget.
In order to employ the level of appropriations authorised by the Budgetary Authority Eurojust asks to increase its staffing request from 144 to 147 posts.
In order to employ the level of appropriations authorised by the Budgetary Authority Eurojust asks to increase its staffing request from 144 to 147 posts.
d) Modification of the establishment plan of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
d) Modification of the establishment plan of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)
The transformation of the European monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) into the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brings along a wider mandate compared to the current structures of the EUMC.
The transformation of the European monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) into the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) brings along a wider mandate compared to the current structures of the EUMC.
The new expert tasks will require the recruitment of more specialists at University level.
The new expert tasks will require the recruitment of more specialists at University level.
Therefore the Agency proposes a better distribution of the posts between Administrators and Assistants, by upgrading of the Establishment Plan combined with a reduction of the total number of posts (from 50 to 46 posts).
Therefore the Agency proposes a better distribution of the posts between Administrators and Assistants, by upgrading of the Establishment Plan combined with a reduction of the total number of posts (from 50 to 46 posts).
e) Modification of the establishment plan of the European Agency for the Management of the Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union (FRONTEX)
e) Modification of the establishment plan of the European Agency for the Management of the Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States of the European Union (FRONTEX)
In the European Union budget for 2007, the budgetary authority placed an additional amount of EUR 12,8 million in the reserve for Frontex.
In the European Union budget for 2007, the budgetary authority placed an additional amount of EUR 12,8 million in the reserve for Frontex.
The additional amount (+60%) was given to the Agency to allow it to better fulfil its tasks.
The additional amount (+60%) was given to the Agency to allow it to better fulfil its tasks.
However, no corresponding change was made to the establishment plan.
However, no corresponding change was made to the establishment plan.
The Commission argues that the future release of the additional funds in the reserve (still pending) will be necessary for Frontex to fulfil its activities set out in the revised Work Programme 2007.
The Commission argues that the future release of the additional funds in the reserve (still pending) will be necessary for Frontex to fulfil its activities set out in the revised Work Programme 2007.
Therefore, they now propose increasing the establishment plan from 34 to 49, as mentioned in the same document.
Therefore, they now propose increasing the establishment plan from 34 to 49, as mentioned in the same document.
Проект на коригиращ бюджет № 4/2007 на Европейския съюз за финансовата 2007 година
Draft amending budget No 4/2007 of the European Union for the financial year 2007
10966/2007 – C6 0195/2007 – 2007/2072(BUD)
10966/2007 – C6 0195/2007 – 2007/2072(BUD)
BUDG 0.0.0000
BUDG 0.0.0000
Заместен докладчик
Previous rapporteur(s)
Дата на съставяне от Съвета на проекта на коригиращ бюджет
Date draft amending budget established by the Council
Дата на предаване от Съвета на проекта на коригиращ бюджет
Date draft amending budget forwarded by the Council
Заместници, присъстващи на окончателното гласуване
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
PE 390.471v02-00
PE 390.471v02-00
относно препоръката за приемане на решение на Съвета за присъединяването на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 17 юни 1998 г., приета на основание член К.3 от Договора за Европейския съюз, за лишаване от правоуправление на ППС
on the recommendation for a Council decision concerning the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 17 June 1998, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on driving disqualifications
– като взе предвид препоръката на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0214 ),
– having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council ( COM(2007)0214 ),
– като взе предвид член 3, параграф 4 от Акта за присъединяване на България и Румъния, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него (С6-0155/2007),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0155/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0269/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0269/2007 ),
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania
OJ 2005, L 157, p.
OJ 2005, L 157, p.
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the seven conventions and protocols concerned in the Justice and Home Affairs area, including the Convention of 17 June 1998, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on driving disqualifications.
Annex I to the Act of Accession gives the list of the seven conventions and protocols concerned in the Justice and Home Affairs area, including the Convention of 17 June 1998, drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on driving disqualifications.
To make the Convention enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania, the Council should only adopt a decision determining the date on which the Convention shall enter into force.
To make the Convention enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania, the Council should only adopt a decision determining the date on which the Convention shall enter into force.
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is only intended to make the adjustments required by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the aforementioned Convention, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession.
This Commission Recommendation for a Council Decision is only intended to make the adjustments required by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the aforementioned Convention, in accordance with Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession.
Присъединяване на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 17 юни 1998 г. за лишаване от право на шофиране
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 17 June 1998 on driving disqualifications
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Esther De Lange, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Athanasios Pafilis, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Esther De Lange, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Athanasios Pafilis, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Adamos Adamou, Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Gérard Deprez, Koenraad Dillen, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Iratxe García Pérez, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Metin Kazak, Jörg Leichtfried, Marianne Mikko, Herbert Reul, Rainer Wieland
Adamos Adamou, Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Gérard Deprez, Koenraad Dillen, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Iratxe García Pérez, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Metin Kazak, Jörg Leichtfried, Marianne Mikko, Herbert Reul, Rainer Wieland
PE 384.638v03-00
PE 384.638v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯ ПО ИКОНОМИЧЕСКИ И ПАРИЧНИ ВЪПРОСИ .........30
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............28
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯ ПО ПРОМИШЛЕНОСТ, иЗСЛЕДВАНИЯ И ЕНЕРГЕТИКА 44
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............41
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯ ПО ТРАНСПОРТ И ТУРИЗЪМ ........................................60
OPINION of the Committee on TRANSPORT AND TOURISM ................................55
относно предложението за директива на Съвета относно определянето и обозначаването на Европейската критична инфраструктура и оценяването на необходимостта от подобряване на нейната защита
on the proposal for a Council directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0787 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0787 ),
– като взе предвид член 308 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0053/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0053/2007 ),
– като взе предвид заключенията на Съвета от 1-2 декември 2005 г. относно принципите за европейска програма за критичната инфраструктура,
– having regard to the Council Conclusions of 1-2 December 2005 on the principles for a European Programme on Critical Infrastructures,
– като взе предвид своята препоръка от 7 юни 2005 г. до Европейския съвет и до Съвета за защита на критични инфраструктури в рамките на борбата срещу тероризма
- having regard to its recommendation of 7 June 2005 to the European Council and to the Council on the protection of critical infrastructure in the framework of the fight against terrorism
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи и становищата на комисия по икономически и парични въпроси, комисия по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика, както и на комисия по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0270/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0270/2007 ),
Proposal for a directive of the Council on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Proposal for a directive of the Council on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Директива на Съвета относно определянето и обозначаването на приоритетни сектори с Европейска критична инфраструктура и оценка на необходимостта от подобряване на тяхната защита
Proposal for a directive of the Council on the identification and designation of priority sectors with European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection
Member States should not be required to notify their specific critical infrastructure to the Commission since this would run counter to national security interests.
Member States should not be required to notify their specific critical infrastructure to the Commission since this would run counter to national security interests.
A European list of critical infrastructure should not be produced in this aggregated form.
A European list of critical infrastructure should not be produced in this aggregated form.
(2) On 17 November 2005 the Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which provided policy options on the establishment of the programme and the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
(2) On 17 November 2005 the Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which provided policy options on the establishment of the programme and the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
The responses received to the Green Paper clearly showed the need to set up a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
The responses received to the Green Paper clearly showed the need to set up a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
The need to increase the critical infrastructure protection capability in Europe and to help reduce vulnerabilities concerning critical infrastructures was acknowledged.
The need to increase the critical infrastructure protection capability in Europe and to help reduce vulnerabilities concerning critical infrastructures was acknowledged.
The importance of the principle of subsidiarity and of stakeholder dialogue was emphasised.
The importance of the principle of subsidiarity and of stakeholder dialogue was emphasised.
(2) На 17 ноември 2005 г. Комисията прие Зелена книга относно Европейска програма за защита на критичната инфраструктура, която предвижда политически възможности за изготвяне на програмата и за Мрежа за предупредителна информация за критичната инфраструктура (CIWIN).
(2) On 17 November 2005 the Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which provided policy options on the establishment of the programme and the Critical Infrastructure Warning Information Network (CIWIN).
Получените отзиви за Зелената книга показаха ясно възможната добавена стойност на общностна рамка за защитата на критичната инфраструктура.
The responses received to the Green Paper underlined the possible added value of a Community framework concerning critical infrastructure protection.
Бе призната необходимостта от повишаване на способността за защита на критичната инфраструктура в Европа и от помощ за намаляване на уязвимостта, що се отнася до критичната инфраструктура.
The need to increase the critical infrastructure protection capability in Europe and to help reduce vulnerabilities concerning critical infrastructures was acknowledged.
Бе изтъкната важността на ключовите принципи на субсидиарност , пропорционалност и допълняемост, както и на диалога със заинтересованите страни.
The importance of the key principles of subsidiarity , proportionality and complementarity as well as of stakeholder dialogue was emphasised.
More in line with reality.
More in line with reality.
(3) In December 2005 the Justice and Home Affairs Council called upon the Commission to make a proposal for a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) and decided that it should be based on an all-hazards approach while countering threats from terrorism as a priority.
(3) In December 2005 the Justice and Home Affairs Council called upon the Commission to make a proposal for a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) and decided that it should be based on an all-hazards approach while countering threats from terrorism as a priority.
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process , but the threat of terrorism should be given priority.
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process , but the threat of terrorism should be given priority.
If the level of protection measures against a particular high level threat is found to be adequate in a critical infrastructure sector, stakeholders should concentrate on other threats to which they are still vulnerable .
If the level of protection measures against a particular high level threat is found to be adequate in a critical infrastructure sector, stakeholders should concentrate on other threats to which they are still vulnerable .
(3) През декември 2005 г. Съветът по правосъдие и вътрешни работи прикани Комисията да изготви предложение за Европейска програма за защита на критичната инфраструктура (ЕПЗКИ) и реши, че тя следва да се основава на подход, вземащ предвид всички опасности и същевременно противопоставящ се приоритетно на тероризма като заплаха.
(3) In December 2005 the Justice and Home Affairs Council called upon the Commission to make a proposal for a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP) and decided that it should be based on an all-hazards approach while countering threats from terrorism as a priority.
При този подход, в процеса на защита на критичната инфраструктура следва да се вземат предвид причинените от хора технологични заплахи и природните бедствия .
Under this approach, manmade, technological threats and natural disasters should be taken into account in the critical infrastructure protection process, while structurally determined threats must also be recorded .
Наред с това трябва да се установяват и структурно обусловени заплахи , но терористичните заплахи имат приоритет.
The threat of terrorism should, however, be given priority.
(4) The primary responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures currently falls on the Member States and the owners/operators of critical infrastructures.
(4) The primary responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures currently falls on the Member States and the owners/operators of critical infrastructures.
This should not change.
This should not change.