natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Група за наблюдение, състояща се от представители на Комисията, съответните държави-членки и на предлагащите организации, осигурява наблюдението на одобрените програми, посочени в членове 8 и 9.
A Monitoring Group, comprising representatives of the Commission, the Member States concerned and the proposing organisations, shall monitor the programmes selected in accordance with Articles 8 and 9.
Група за наблюдение, състояща се от представители на Комисията, съответните държави-членки и на предлагащите организации, осигурява управлението на одобрените програми, посочени в членове 8 и 9.
A Monitoring Group, comprising representatives of the Commission, the Member States concerned and the proposing organisations, shall manage the programmes selected in accordance with Articles 8 and 9.
It is important that the Monitoring Group should not only have an information function but that it should also issue opinions, interpret details, adopt agreements, etc.; ultimately it should provide guidance for the actual development of programmes in order to ensure greater legal certainty.
It is important that the Monitoring Group should not only have an information function but that it should also issue opinions, interpret details, adopt agreements, etc.; ultimately it should provide guidance for the actual development of programmes in order to ensure greater legal certainty.
Финансовото участие на Общността в одобрените програми, посочени в членове 8 и 9, не превишава 50 % от действителните разходи за програмите.
The Community's financial participation in the programmes selected under Articles 8 and 9 shall not exceed 50% of the actual cost of these programmes.
В случаите на програми за информиране и насърчаване със срок от две или три години, участието, за всяка година от прилагането им, не трябва да надвишава тази максимална граница.
Where information and promotion programmes have a duration of two or three years, the participation for each year of implementation shall not exceed this ceiling.
Финансовото участие на Общността в одобрените програми, посочени в членове 8 и 9, не превишава 60% от действителните разходи за програмите.
The Community's financial participation in the programmes selected under Articles 8 and 9 shall not exceed 60% of the actual cost of these programmes.
Обаче, в случай на програми, отнасящи се до органичното земеделие и програми, свързани с действия, предприети в резултат на кризисна ситуация, финансовото участие на Общността в тези програми не надвишава 70%.
However, in the case of programmes related to organic farming and programmes dealing with measures taken as a result of crisis situations, the level of the Community’s financial participation to such programmes shall not exceed 70%.
The level of Community financial contribution to promotion measures related to organic production schemes should be increased, as the application of these standards at the level of particular holdings renders the primary production closer to sustainable, organic practices.
The level of Community financial contribution to promotion measures related to organic production schemes should be increased, as the application of these standards at the level of particular holdings renders the primary production closer to sustainable, organic practices.
In case of crisis situations promotion campaigns should receive stronger Community’s support.
In case of crisis situations promotion campaigns should receive stronger Community’s support.
At the same time, the overall increase of the budgetary allocation for promotion measures would help maintain and guarantee the necessary level of coherence between various information and promotion campaigns throughout the EU-27.
At the same time, the overall increase of the budgetary allocation for promotion measures would help maintain and guarantee the necessary level of coherence between various information and promotion campaigns throughout the EU-27.
Thus, the overall level of Community’s financial contribution should be raised to 60%.
Thus, the overall level of Community’s financial contribution should be raised to 60%.
The level of organisations’ financial participation should be lowered to 10% in order to make it possible for smaller organisations to participate in promotion measures.
The level of organisations’ financial participation should be lowered to 10% in order to make it possible for smaller organisations to participate in promotion measures.
Предлагащите организации участват във финансирането на предложените от тях програми с най-малко 20 % от действителните разходи за програмите, а останалата част от финансирането се покрива от съответната или съответните държави-членки, като се взема под внимание финансовото участие на Общността, посочено в параграф 2.
Proposing organisations shall participate in the funding of the programmes they propose to a level of at least 20% of the actual costs of the programmes, with the remaining funding being borne by the Member States concerned, taking account of the Community's participation referred to in paragraph 2.
Предлагащите организации участват във финансирането на предложените от тях програми с най-малко 10% от действителните разходи за програмите, а останалата част от финансирането се покрива от съответната или съответните държави-членки, като се взема под внимание финансовото участие на Общността, посочено в параграф 2.
Proposing organisations shall participate in the funding of the programmes they propose to a level of at least 10% of the actual costs of the programmes, with the remaining funding being borne by the Member States concerned, taking account of the Community's participation referred to in paragraph 2.
See justification to Article 13, paragraph 2.
See justification to Article 13, paragraph 2.
Член 15, параграф 1 a (нов)
Article 15, paragraph 1 a (new)
Тези правила осигуряват по-специално на предлагащите организации възможността да представят програмите си поне два пъти годишно, а на държавите-членки да представят на Комисията предложенията за програми при същите условия.
Those rules shall in particular provide for the possibility for proposing organisations to submit their programme at least twice a year and for the Member States to submit the programme proposals to the Commission on the same terms.
The current system of submitting the programmes only once a year is problematic for operators.
The current system of submitting the programmes only once a year is problematic for operators.
In case of a re-adjustment of the rejected programmes they have to wait one year to re-introduce them.
In case of a re-adjustment of the rejected programmes they have to wait one year to re-introduce them.
The possibility of presenting the programmes for the internal market and third countries twice per year will give more flexibility to proposing organisations.
The possibility of presenting the programmes for the internal market and third countries twice per year will give more flexibility to proposing organisations.
Член 16, параграф 2 a (нов)
Article 16, paragraph 2 a (new)
При позоваване на този параграф се прилагат членове 5 и 7 на Решение 1999/468/ЕО.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply.
Периодът, залегнал в член 5, параграф 6 на Решение 1999/468/ЕО, се определя на три месеца.
The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
Provisions should be made for a proper distinction between the implementing measures related to technical issues of acceptance of projects submitted by proposing organisations and issues related to strategic approach with regard to market outlet studies and export opportunities.
Provisions should be made for a proper distinction between the implementing measures related to technical issues of acceptance of projects submitted by proposing organisations and issues related to strategic approach with regard to market outlet studies and export opportunities.
In the first case, the management procedure should be used, whereas, in the second case, since the choice of export strategy maintains certain aspects of political importance, the regulatory procedure should be applied.
In the first case, the management procedure should be used, whereas, in the second case, since the choice of export strategy maintains certain aspects of political importance, the regulatory procedure should be applied.
Член 17, уводна част
Article 17, introductory part
Преди съставянето на списъците, предвидени в член 4, преди определянето на насоките, предвидени в член 5, одобряването на програмите, предвидено в членове 6 и 9, преди вземането на решение относно действията съгласно член 10 или приемането на правилата за прилагане, предвидени в член 15, Комисията може да се консултира с:
Before drawing up the lists provided for in Article 4, defining the guidelines under Article 5, approving the programmes referred to in Articles 6 and 9, taking a decision on the measures in accordance with Article 10 or adopting the detailed implementing rules under Article 15, the Commission may consult:
Преди съставянето на списъците, предвидени в член 4, преди определянето на насоките, предвидени в член 5, одобряването на програмите, предвидено в членове 6 и 9, преди вземането на решение относно мерките съгласно член 10 и приемането на правилата за прилагане, предвидени в член 15, Комисията се консултира с:
Before drawing up the lists provided for in Article 4, defining the guidelines under Article 5, approving the programmes referred to in Articles 6 and 9, taking a decision on the measures in accordance with Article 10 or adopting the detailed implementing rules under Article 15, the Commission shall consult:
Преди 31 декември 2012 г. Комисията представя на Европейския парламент и на Съвета доклад за прилагането на настоящия регламент, придружен, когато е необходимо, с подходящи предложения.
Before 31 December 2012 , the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation, together with any appropriate proposals.
Преди 31 декември 2010 г. Комисията представя на Европейския парламент и на Съвета доклад за прилагането на настоящия регламент, придружен, когато е необходимо, с подходящи предложения.
Before 31 December 2010 , the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of this Regulation, together with any appropriate proposals.
Since the aim of this proposal for a Regulation is to combine the two existing Regulations which have been in force since 1999, we consider that enough experience has been acquired to be able to issue a report in 2010 and make appropriate proposals.
Since the aim of this proposal for a Regulation is to combine the two existing Regulations which have been in force since 1999, we consider that enough experience has been acquired to be able to issue a report in 2010 and make appropriate proposals.
Simplification of the Community regime on information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries constitutes a vital step towards the simple and manageable European agriculture policy.
Simplification of the Community regime on information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products on the internal market and in third countries constitutes a vital step towards the simple and manageable European agriculture policy.
This is in line with the previous simplification activities carried out by the Community on the European Commission’s conceptual and legislative initiative.
This is in line with the previous simplification activities carried out by the Community on the European Commission’s conceptual and legislative initiative.
One of the proposals of the DG Agriculture and Rural Development Action Plan on Simplification of Common Agricultural Policy
One of the proposals of the DG Agriculture and Rural Development Action Plan on Simplification of Common Agricultural Policy
Working paper, October 2006. provided namely for the need of simplification of the framework of promotion of agricultural products and called for drawing up a single legal framework able to clarify rules for applying the programmes.
Working paper, October 2006. provided namely for the need of simplification of the framework of promotion of agricultural products and called for drawing up a single legal framework able to clarify rules for applying the programmes.
Before dealing with the current legislative proposal, the European Commission delivered a special Report on the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2702/1999 on measures to provide information on, and to promote, agricultural products in third countries and Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market
Before dealing with the current legislative proposal, the European Commission delivered a special Report on the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2702/1999 on measures to provide information on, and to promote, agricultural products in third countries and Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market
COM(2006)0855 - {SEC(2006) 1785}. , where it proposed five actions to be taken as a result of the conclusions taken from the experience gained by the Community in the application of the programmes.
COM(2006)0855 - {SEC(2006) 1785}. , where it proposed five actions to be taken as a result of the conclusions taken from the experience gained by the Community in the application of the programmes.
One of them was the regulatory consolidation meant as the exercise of combining the two basic Council Regulations into a single text with the aim of committing the same approach towards the implementing rules.
One of them was the regulatory consolidation meant as the exercise of combining the two basic Council Regulations into a single text with the aim of committing the same approach towards the implementing rules.
Thus, the role of the European Parliament in the current process should be focused on taking a further look into any simplification possibilities with regard to the basic provisions of the Regulation but also when it comes to the systematic approach of any other promotion instruments of the Community in its entire and complex field of activities.
Thus, the role of the European Parliament in the current process should be focused on taking a further look into any simplification possibilities with regard to the basic provisions of the Regulation but also when it comes to the systematic approach of any other promotion instruments of the Community in its entire and complex field of activities.
It should be namely considered, whether the Community promotion mechanism might play a more significant role in the light of recent CAP reforms and possible future WTO developments.
It should be namely considered, whether the Community promotion mechanism might play a more significant role in the light of recent CAP reforms and possible future WTO developments.
In this context, the Rapporteur shall stress that the advancing DDA negotiations should bring the Community to have a closer look at the possibilities lying behind the promotion campaigns.
In this context, the Rapporteur shall stress that the advancing DDA negotiations should bring the Community to have a closer look at the possibilities lying behind the promotion campaigns.
The outcome of possible future agreement might lead to tariff cuts of between 48% and 73% for most of Community’s agricultural products.
The outcome of possible future agreement might lead to tariff cuts of between 48% and 73% for most of Community’s agricultural products.
In addition, the EU’s allowed level of domestic support could be reduced up to 70%.
In addition, the EU’s allowed level of domestic support could be reduced up to 70%.
This would mean that in case of EU the total level of domestic support would be reduced down to EUR 20.1bn.
This would mean that in case of EU the total level of domestic support would be reduced down to EUR 20.1bn.
On top of that, the preliminary obligation to eliminate all range of export subsidies by 2013 also provides for a 50% budgetary cut to be committed already before 2010.
On top of that, the preliminary obligation to eliminate all range of export subsidies by 2013 also provides for a 50% budgetary cut to be committed already before 2010.
Under such scenario - where tariff cuts, export refunds elimination and domestic support cuts are foreseen – the EU should extend the scope of the promotion measures and increase the budget for promotion and information campaigns.
Under such scenario - where tariff cuts, export refunds elimination and domestic support cuts are foreseen – the EU should extend the scope of the promotion measures and increase the budget for promotion and information campaigns.
Under certain conditions, the WTO rules do not exclude possible alterations and extensions of the promotion scheme, because this instrument does not have a negative impact on trade and at the same time might exert positive impact on the competitiveness of Community’s exports.
Under certain conditions, the WTO rules do not exclude possible alterations and extensions of the promotion scheme, because this instrument does not have a negative impact on trade and at the same time might exert positive impact on the competitiveness of Community’s exports.
Further on, the extension of the scope of the Community promotion campaign might lead to its greater level of compatibility with WTO rules, because the programmes must be ‘widely available’ to be in line with WTO provisions.
Further on, the extension of the scope of the Community promotion campaign might lead to its greater level of compatibility with WTO rules, because the programmes must be ‘widely available’ to be in line with WTO provisions.
The currently binding Community provisions set up the system of an administrative choice over the limited number of products supported under the promotion campaigns which might cause possible threats of external reservations on the link between the promotion campaign and production.
The currently binding Community provisions set up the system of an administrative choice over the limited number of products supported under the promotion campaigns which might cause possible threats of external reservations on the link between the promotion campaign and production.
This should be the subject of detailed analysis.
This should be the subject of detailed analysis.
Going back to the simplification process, it would have to be underlined that the real potential for a reduction of administrative burdens for proposing organizations lies in an appropriate streamlining of European Commission’s implementing provisions and guidelines.
Going back to the simplification process, it would have to be underlined that the real potential for a reduction of administrative burdens for proposing organizations lies in an appropriate streamlining of European Commission’s implementing provisions and guidelines.
Therefore, the European Commission can count on full support from the European Parliament’s side when it comes to establishing in the basic Regulation of appropriate legislative powers to simplify the Guidelines at the implementing level.
Therefore, the European Commission can count on full support from the European Parliament’s side when it comes to establishing in the basic Regulation of appropriate legislative powers to simplify the Guidelines at the implementing level.
For instance, it would seem appropriate to make the process of submitting and selecting of the programmes possible twice a year.
For instance, it would seem appropriate to make the process of submitting and selecting of the programmes possible twice a year.
It seems appropriate to extend the list of eligible products – primary as well as processed products both for programmes implemented on the internal market and in third countries.
It seems appropriate to extend the list of eligible products – primary as well as processed products both for programmes implemented on the internal market and in third countries.
The current limited scope of sectors and product range makes the scheme subject to WTO reservations and claims of coupled character of the measure.
The current limited scope of sectors and product range makes the scheme subject to WTO reservations and claims of coupled character of the measure.
The list of third countries eligible should also be extended to all third countries.
The list of third countries eligible should also be extended to all third countries.
It would be also advisable to consider the eventual inclusion of the harmonized promotion tool into the legal framework of the single CMO Regulation what might lead to a greater market operators’ knowledge of the scheme.
It would be also advisable to consider the eventual inclusion of the harmonized promotion tool into the legal framework of the single CMO Regulation what might lead to a greater market operators’ knowledge of the scheme.
From the technical simplification point of view it seems that the need for legal transparency and quality of the draft text would require some improvements to be done with regard to excessive use of cross-references.
From the technical simplification point of view it seems that the need for legal transparency and quality of the draft text would require some improvements to be done with regard to excessive use of cross-references.
Separately, what needs to be taken into consideration is the issue of desirable increase of the Community’s budget allocation for horizontal promotion measures.
Separately, what needs to be taken into consideration is the issue of desirable increase of the Community’s budget allocation for horizontal promotion measures.
The current subtotal allocation under the budgetary heading ‘05 02 10’ (promotion measures) amounts to EUR 45 840 000 expressed as the level of payments’ appropriations for the year 2007.
The current subtotal allocation under the budgetary heading ‘05 02 10’ (promotion measures) amounts to EUR 45 840 000 expressed as the level of payments’ appropriations for the year 2007.
For EU-27 such an amount in the long run would leave no significant impact on the improvement of Community’s ability to extend potential market outlets for high quality agri-food production.
For EU-27 such an amount in the long run would leave no significant impact on the improvement of Community’s ability to extend potential market outlets for high quality agri-food production.
Under the circumstances of progressive elimination of export subsidies (mostly by means of reduction, suspension or setting zero rate of export refunds), decoupling, elimination of market management measures, the significant budgetary extension of promotion schemes seems inevitable to maintain the level of competitiveness of EU agriculture.
Under the circumstances of progressive elimination of export subsidies (mostly by means of reduction, suspension or setting zero rate of export refunds), decoupling, elimination of market management measures, the significant budgetary extension of promotion schemes seems inevitable to maintain the level of competitiveness of EU agriculture.
At the same time, information campaigns should serve for giving the consumers good knowledge about sustainable CAP production, high quality of EU agricultural products, organic farming as well as health aspects.
At the same time, information campaigns should serve for giving the consumers good knowledge about sustainable CAP production, high quality of EU agricultural products, organic farming as well as health aspects.
The increase of the budgetary allocation for promotion measures together with strengthening the role of this instrument within the agricultural acquis would help maintain and guarantee the necessary level of coherence between various information and promotion campaigns throughout the EU-27.
The increase of the budgetary allocation for promotion measures together with strengthening the role of this instrument within the agricultural acquis would help maintain and guarantee the necessary level of coherence between various information and promotion campaigns throughout the EU-27.