natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Когато трета страна приема мерки за намаляване на въздействието върху изменението на климата от полети, и които са най-малко еквивалентни на изискванията на настоящата директива, Комисията изменя настоящата директива, за да предотврати двойното преброяване и да гарантира еднакво третиране.
Where a third country adopts measures for reducing the climate change impact of flights which are at least equivalent to the requirements of this Directive, the Commission shall amend this Directive in order to avoid double charging and to ensure equal treatment .
Where third countries introduce equivalent schemes, double charging must be avoided when the Directive is amended.
Where third countries introduce equivalent schemes, double charging must be avoided when the Directive is amended.
„ За 2011 г. единствено полети, които заминават от летище и пристигат на летище и двете разположени на територията на държава-членка, за която се прилага Договора, се включват в дейността на авиацията.
“ For the year 2011 only flights which both depart from and arrive in an airport situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies shall be included in the activity of aviation.
От 1 януари 2012 г. се включват всички полети, които пристигат или заминават от летище, разположено на територията на държава-членка, за която се прилага Договора“.
From 1 January 2012, all flights which arrive at or depart from an airport situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies shall be included”.
„От 1 януари 2012 г. се включват всички полети, които пристигат или заминават от летище, разположено на територията на държава-членка, за която се прилага Договора , с изключение на полети между крайно отдалечен регион и европейската континентална зона.
“From 1 January 2012, all flights which arrive at or depart from an airport situated in the territory of a Member State to which the Treaty applies shall be included , with the exception of flights between an ultra-peripheral region and the European continental zone.
По причини на еднаквото третиране операторите на въздушен транспорт от Европейския съюз се включват само тогава, когато са включени и оператори от трети страни, които предлагат услуги за въздушен транспорт в дадената географска рамка.“
For the purpose of equal treatment, air operators from the EU shall only be included if air operators from third countries providing air transport services in the given geographical area are also included .”
As the European Parliament already decided in 2006 by a large majority, the emissions trading scheme must be introduced on the same date for European airlines and third-country airlines, inter alia in order to avoid distortion of competition between airlines and airports.
As the European Parliament already decided in 2006 by a large majority, the emissions trading scheme must be introduced on the same date for European airlines and third-country airlines, inter alia in order to avoid distortion of competition between airlines and airports.
The choice of 2012 will on the one hand enable the introduction of the measure to proceed smoothly for all concerned in the European Union - particularly in the new EU Member States - and will on the other hand afford a realistic opportunity for third countries to introduce equivalent schemes by that date.
The choice of 2012 will on the one hand enable the introduction of the measure to proceed smoothly for all concerned in the European Union - particularly in the new EU Member States - and will on the other hand afford a realistic opportunity for third countries to introduce equivalent schemes by that date.
Приложение I, параграф 2б (нов), таблица, буква б) (Директива 2003/87/ЕО)
Annex I, paragraph 2 b (new), table point (b) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
б) военни полети, изпълнявани от военни въздухоплавателни средства, както митнически и полицейски полети, и полети за издирване и спасяване , разрешени от съответния компетентен орган;
(b) military flights performed by military aircraft and customs and police flights and search and rescue flights authorised by the appropriate competent authority;
б) въздухоплавателни средства, използвани за военни, митнически и полицейски полети,полети за издирване и спасяване и медицинска помощ, както и помощ при бедствия, разрешени от съответния компетентен орган;
(b) aircraft used in military, customs and police services, search and rescue and medical and disaster relief authorised by the appropriate competent authority;
This would ensure that the exemption covers aircraft chartered for use by the military and also in disaster relief.
This would ensure that the exemption covers aircraft chartered for use by the military and also in disaster relief.
Приложение I, таблица, буква в) (Директива 2003/87/ЕО)
Annex I, table, point (c) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
в) всички полети проведени изцяло по правилата за визуални полети, както са определени в приложение 2 към Конвенцията за международна гражданска авиация от 1944 г.;
c) any flights performed exclusively under visual flight rules as defined in Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation 1944
Giving exemption of flights performed under visual flight rules could encourage operations of this kind to the detriment of air safety.
Giving exemption of flights performed under visual flight rules could encourage operations of this kind to the detriment of air safety.
The existing exemption for light aircraft already covers most of the flights performed under visual flight rules.
The existing exemption for light aircraft already covers most of the flights performed under visual flight rules.
Приложение, точка (1), буква В
ANNEX, POINT 1, POINT (C) Annex I, paragraph 2, table - new Category (e) (Directive 2003/87/EC)
е) полети, проведени с единствената цел за проверка или изпитване на оборудване, използвано или предназначено за използване като наземна помощ за въздушна навигация, с изключение на полети за позициониране на въпросното въздухоплавателно средство ; и
(f) flights performed exclusively for the purpose of checking or testing equipment used or intended to be used as ground aids to air navigation excluding positioning flights by the aircraft concerned ; and
е) полети, проведени с единствената цел за проверка или изпитване или издаване на сертификати за самолети или наземно оборудване, както и за транспортирането на нови самолети ; и
(f) flights performed exclusively for the purpose of checking , testing or certifying aircraft or ground equipment, and ferrying new aircraft ; and
Such flights should be equated with the flights referred to at (d) and (e).
Such flights should be equated with the flights referred to at (d) and (e).
ж) полети, проведени от въздухоплавателно средство с удостоверено максимално тегло при излитане по-малко от 5 700 кг.
(g) flights performed by aircraft with a certified maximum take-off weight of less than 5 700kg .
ж) полети, проведени от въздухоплавателно средство с удостоверено максимално тегло при излитане по-малко от 20 000 кг.
(g) flights performed by aircraft with a certified maximum take-off weight of less than 20 000 kg .
The threshold value should be increased to revert to the value originally planned by the Commission, since such aircraft produce less than 1% of aviation emissions and since their inclusion in the emissions trading scheme would cause a disproportionately heavy administrative burden for these small aircraft operators.
The threshold value should be increased to revert to the value originally planned by the Commission, since such aircraft produce less than 1% of aviation emissions and since their inclusion in the emissions trading scheme would cause a disproportionately heavy administrative burden for these small aircraft operators.
За целите на кандидатстване за получаване на квоти в съответствие с член 3г, параграф 1, количеството авиационна дейност се изчислява в налични тонкилометри, като се използва следната формула:
For the purpose of applying for an allocation of allowances in accordance with Article 3d(1), the amount of aviation activity shall be calculated in available tonne-kilometres using the following formula:
In order to maintain and strengthen territorial cohesion in the European Union, the basis for the calculation model should not be the aircraft payload ('revenue tonne kilometre - RTK') but the aircraft capacity ('available tonne kilometre - ATK').
In order to maintain and strengthen territorial cohesion in the European Union, the basis for the calculation model should not be the aircraft payload ('revenue tonne kilometre - RTK') but the aircraft capacity ('available tonne kilometre - ATK').
There would otherwise be a risk that in particular air services to remote areas, islands and outermost regions will be disproportionately burdened.
There would otherwise be a risk that in particular air services to remote areas, islands and outermost regions will be disproportionately burdened.
The same is true of short- and medium-haul flights within the EU.
The same is true of short- and medium-haul flights within the EU.
налични тонкилометри = разстояние х полезен товар
available tonne kilometres = distance x payload
„полезен товар“ означава общото тегло на превозваните товари, поща и пътници.
"payload" means the total mass of freight, mail and passengers carried .
„полезен товар“ означава общото тегло на превозваните товари, поща и пътници , които един самолет е в състояние да превози .
"payload" means the total mass of freight, mail and passengers which an aircraft is capable of carrying .
– броят на пътниците е броят на лицата на борда, като се изключат членовете на екипажа;
– the number of passengers shall be the number of persons onboard excluding crew members;
– броят на пътниците е броят на местата за сядане на борда, като се изключат членовете на екипажа;
– the number of passengers shall be the number of seats onboard excluding crew members;
- Брой полети между всяка двойка летища;
– Number of flights by airport pair;
Reporting requirements should be limited to those which are objectively necessary.
Reporting requirements should be limited to those which are objectively necessary.
– Брой пътникокилометри между всяка двойка летища;
– Number of passenger-kilometres by airport pair;
– Брой тонкилометри между всяка двойка летища;
– Number of tonne-kilometres by airport pair;
(2) Институциите на Общността и държавите-членки гарантират, че методите, които трябва да се прилагат от проверяващите, са хармонизирани преди прилагане на директивата и се прилагат еднакво при изпълнението.
(2) Community Institutions and the Member States shall ensure that the methods to be used by verifiers are harmonised before the Directive is applied, and that they are applied uniformly in practice.
The work of the national verifiers should be carried out uniformly, inter alia in order to avoid distortion of competition between airlines.
The work of the national verifiers should be carried out uniformly, inter alia in order to avoid distortion of competition between airlines.
(17) Институциите на Общността и държавите-членки гарантират, че методите, които трябва да се прилагат от проверяващите, са хармонизирани преди прилагане на директивата и се прилагат еднакво при изпълнението.
(17) Community Institutions and the Member States shall ensure that the methods to be used by verifiers are harmonised before the Directive is applied, and that they are applied uniformly in practice.
Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
Adamos Adamou, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Amalia Sartori, Karin Scheele, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Guido Sacconi, Amalia Sartori, Karin Scheele, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Gaľa, Umberto Guidoni, Karin Jöns, Caroline Lucas, Miroslav Mikolášik, Eluned Morgan, Renate Sommer, Bart Staes, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Gaľa, Umberto Guidoni, Karin Jöns, Caroline Lucas, Miroslav Mikolášik, Eluned Morgan, Renate Sommer, Bart Staes, Lambert van Nistelrooij
относно предложението за решение на Съвета относно приемане, от името на Европейската общност, на протокола за изменение на Споразумението ТРИПС, съставен в Женева на 6 декември 2005 г.
on the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol amending the the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005
PE 390.562v02-00
PE 390.562v02-00
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................11
относно предложението за решение на Съвета относно приемане, от името на Европейската общност, на протокола за изменение на Споразумението ТРИПС, съставен в Женева на 6 декември 2005 г.
on the proposal for a Council decision on the acceptance, on behalf of the European Community, of the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement, done at Geneva on 6 December 2005
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета,
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (8934/2006),
– като взе предвид препоръката на комисия по международна търговия и становището на комисия по правни въпроси ( A6‑0403/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0403/2007 ),
The TRIPS Agreement adopted in 1994 extends the basic legal principles of the World Trade Organisation to the area of intellectual property and increases minimum protection standards for intellectual property.
The TRIPS Agreement adopted in 1994 extends the basic legal principles of the World Trade Organisation to the area of intellectual property and increases minimum protection standards for intellectual property.
The significant costs associated with the introduction of higher intellectual property protection standards in developing countries generated intense discussion, particularly as to whether increased patent protection under the rules of the TRIPS Agreement impeded access to affordable medicines in poor countries.
The significant costs associated with the introduction of higher intellectual property protection standards in developing countries generated intense discussion, particularly as to whether increased patent protection under the rules of the TRIPS Agreement impeded access to affordable medicines in poor countries.
The WTO Ministerial Conference held in Doha in 2001 culminated in the adoption of the 'Doha Declaration', which stressed that the TRIPS Agreement could and should be interpreted and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO members' right to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.
The WTO Ministerial Conference held in Doha in 2001 culminated in the adoption of the 'Doha Declaration', which stressed that the TRIPS Agreement could and should be interpreted and implemented in a manner supportive of WTO members' right to protect public health and, in particular, to promote access to medicines for all.
In addition to affirming existing 'flexibilities' in the TRIPS Agreement, the declaration recognised that countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector could face difficulties in making effective use of compulsory licensing and instructed the Council for TRIPS to find an 'expeditious solution' to this problem.
In addition to affirming existing 'flexibilities' in the TRIPS Agreement, the declaration recognised that countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector could face difficulties in making effective use of compulsory licensing and instructed the Council for TRIPS to find an 'expeditious solution' to this problem.
After long and difficult negotiations, the Council for TRIPS reached an agreement which was adopted by a decision of the general Council of the WTO on 30 August 2003.
After long and difficult negotiations, the Council for TRIPS reached an agreement which was adopted by a decision of the general Council of the WTO on 30 August 2003.
This decision spells out the circumstances under which countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector can make effective use of compulsory licensing and import generic versions of drugs still under patent, subject to a large number of conditions in both the exporting and importing country.
This decision spells out the circumstances under which countries with insufficient or no manufacturing capacity in the pharmaceutical sector can make effective use of compulsory licensing and import generic versions of drugs still under patent, subject to a large number of conditions in both the exporting and importing country.
To render the mechanism established in the decision operational, implementation at national or - as in the case of the European Union - regional level was required.
To render the mechanism established in the decision operational, implementation at national or - as in the case of the European Union - regional level was required.
To that end, in October 2004 the Commission presented, under the co-decision procedure, a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems.
To that end, in October 2004 the Commission presented, under the co-decision procedure, a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory licensing of patents relating to the manufacture of pharmaceutical products for export to countries with public health problems.
The proposal contained a large number of charges and conditions in addition to the substantial number already envisaged in the WTO decision.
The proposal contained a large number of charges and conditions in addition to the substantial number already envisaged in the WTO decision.
The rapporteur, Mr Van Hecke, accordingly directed his efforts to ensuring that the text transposed the WTO decision as faithfully as possible, by seeking to remove all additional conditions which would have rendered the - already extremely complex - mechanism even more complicated, confusing and, in effect, unusable.
The rapporteur, Mr Van Hecke, accordingly directed his efforts to ensuring that the text transposed the WTO decision as faithfully as possible, by seeking to remove all additional conditions which would have rendered the - already extremely complex - mechanism even more complicated, confusing and, in effect, unusable.
On 12 July 2005 the Committee on International Trade adopted the report by a very large majority, with a couple of abstentions.
On 12 July 2005 the Committee on International Trade adopted the report by a very large majority, with a couple of abstentions.
In the run-up to the forthcoming WTO ministerial conference in Hong Kong, strengthened by the solid report he had received from the committee, Mr Van Hecke, instead of seeking the report's immediate adoption in plenary, launched, in close cooperation with the shadow rapporteurs of the other political groups, an informal trialogue with the Commission and the Council with a view to achieving interinstitutional agreement on first reading before the Hong Kong conference and thus strengthening the European Union's position in the multilateral negotiations.
In the run-up to the forthcoming WTO ministerial conference in Hong Kong, strengthened by the solid report he had received from the committee, Mr Van Hecke, instead of seeking the report's immediate adoption in plenary, launched, in close cooperation with the shadow rapporteurs of the other political groups, an informal trialogue with the Commission and the Council with a view to achieving interinstitutional agreement on first reading before the Hong Kong conference and thus strengthening the European Union's position in the multilateral negotiations.
In the course of the trialogue, the rapporteur negotiated a compromise on the assumption that the regulation represented only a temporary solution and that the European Parliament would be consulted again when a permanent amendment was adopted, which still seemed to be a distant prospect at that time.
In the course of the trialogue, the rapporteur negotiated a compromise on the assumption that the regulation represented only a temporary solution and that the European Parliament would be consulted again when a permanent amendment was adopted, which still seemed to be a distant prospect at that time.
In its report, our committee had specifically asked the Commission to present, at three-year intervals after the entry into force of the regulation, a report on its operation, in order to monitor the use made of the mechanism it introduced.
In its report, our committee had specifically asked the Commission to present, at three-year intervals after the entry into force of the regulation, a report on its operation, in order to monitor the use made of the mechanism it introduced.
The text adopted by the Committee on International Trade was more ambitious than the final compromise text, particularly with regard to technology transfer and capacity building in the developing countries, the remuneration of right holders, the simplified and accelerated procedure and the non-suspensory effect of appeals.
The text adopted by the Committee on International Trade was more ambitious than the final compromise text, particularly with regard to technology transfer and capacity building in the developing countries, the remuneration of right holders, the simplified and accelerated procedure and the non-suspensory effect of appeals.
Nevertheless, Parliament's input greatly improved the Commission's original proposal.
Nevertheless, Parliament's input greatly improved the Commission's original proposal.