natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The criteria for a more precise product description (milk) and its packaging and/or labelling should be more clearly defined in the draft regulation.
The criteria for a more precise product description (milk) and its packaging and/or labelling should be more clearly defined in the draft regulation.
Член 3, параграф 1, алинея 2 (Регламент (EО) No 2597/97)
Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 2597/97)
Топлинно обработеното мляко, което не отговаря на изискванията, които са посочени в букви б), в) и г) от първа алинея, относно съдържанието на мазнини, може да се счита като мляко за пиене, при условие, че съдържанието на мазнини е посочено, ясно и разбираемо, върху опаковката под формата „съдържание на мазнини от ... %“ .
Heat-treated milk not complying with the fat content requirements laid down in points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph may be considered drinking milk provided that the fat content is clearly indicated and easily readable on the packaging in form of ‘ fat content of ...%’.
Такова мляко няма да бъде описвано като пълномаслено, полуобезмаслено или обезмаслено.
Such milk shall not be described as whole milk, semi-skimmed milk or skimmed milk.
Държавите-членки могат да разрешат на производителите да посочат съдържанието на мазнини под формата „съдържание на мазнини от … % + 0,2 %.
Member States may allow producers to indicate the fat content in the form of ‘fat content of …% + 0.2%’ .
Топлинно обработеното мляко, което не отговаря на изискванията, които са посочени в букви б), в) и г) от първа алинея, относно съдържанието на мазнини, следва да се счита като мляко за пиене в съответствие с определенията в Директива 2000/13/EО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 20 март 2000 г. относно сближаване на законодателствата на държавите-членки във връзка с етикетирането, представянето и рекламиране на хранителни продукти 1 при условие, че съдържанието на мазнини е посочено, ясно и разбираемо и поставено непосредствено до описанието на продукта върху опаковката под формата „мляко ...% мазнини”.
Heat-treated milk not complying with the fat content requirements laid down in points (b), (c) and (d) of the first subparagraph shall be considered drinking milk in accordance with the definitions in Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 March 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the labelling, presentation and advertising of foodstuffs 1 provided that the fat content is clearly indicated and easily readable and directly next to the product description on the packaging in form of ‘ milk ...% fat ’.
1 OВ L 109, 6.5.2000 г., стp.
1 OJ L 109, 6.5.2000, p.
Директива, последно изменена от директива на Комисията 2006/142/EО ( OВ L 368, 23.12.2006 г.,стp.
Directive as last amended by Commission Directive 2006/142/EC ( OJ L 368, 23.12.2006, p.
The link between the fat content and product description and the specific fat content should be indicated on the packaging.
The link between the fat content and product description and the specific fat content should be indicated on the packaging.
In addition, the scope should be more precisely expressed through a reference to Directive 2000/13/EC that lays down the general rules for food labelling.
In addition, the scope should be more precisely expressed through a reference to Directive 2000/13/EC that lays down the general rules for food labelling.
There is no real need to include a margin of tolerance of ‘± 0.2%’ as it would have no practical advantages.
There is no real need to include a margin of tolerance of ‘± 0.2%’ as it would have no practical advantages.
The introduction of such a tolerance margin could lead to (considerable) ambiguities and make harmonised implementation more difficult.
The introduction of such a tolerance margin could lead to (considerable) ambiguities and make harmonised implementation more difficult.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 currently recognises only three categories of drinking milk that can be produced and marketed in the Community.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 currently recognises only three categories of drinking milk that can be produced and marketed in the Community.
These are skimmed milk (maximum 0.5% fat), semi-skimmed milk (1.5% to 1.8% fat) and whole milk (at least 3.5% fat).
These are skimmed milk (maximum 0.5% fat), semi-skimmed milk (1.5% to 1.8% fat) and whole milk (at least 3.5% fat).
By amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 the Commission proposes to allow the production and marketing of drinking milk that does not comply with the present three categories in the European Union as long as a clear and easily readable indication of the fat content is present on the label.
By amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2597/97 the Commission proposes to allow the production and marketing of drinking milk that does not comply with the present three categories in the European Union as long as a clear and easily readable indication of the fat content is present on the label.
As well as liberalising the drinking-milk market, the proposal also means that different (national) transitional provisions and derogations from the current limit of three milk categories will no longer be necessary.
As well as liberalising the drinking-milk market, the proposal also means that different (national) transitional provisions and derogations from the current limit of three milk categories will no longer be necessary.
The proposal to introduce a more flexible definition of ‘drinking milk’ will lead to the liberalisation of the drinking-milk market.
The proposal to introduce a more flexible definition of ‘drinking milk’ will lead to the liberalisation of the drinking-milk market.
However, it should be noted that while the proposal may lead to increased flexibility with possible advantages for intra-Community trade and the consumer, it may also lead to consumer uncertainty and confusion.
However, it should be noted that while the proposal may lead to increased flexibility with possible advantages for intra-Community trade and the consumer, it may also lead to consumer uncertainty and confusion.
Thus it should be emphasised that the Commission’s wording ‘easily readable and visible’ with regard to correct labelling is very broad and ambiguous.
Thus it should be emphasised that the Commission’s wording ‘easily readable and visible’ with regard to correct labelling is very broad and ambiguous.
The transitional provisions and derogations that allow for production and marketing of milk outside the three current categories form part of different accession treaties.
The transitional provisions and derogations that allow for production and marketing of milk outside the three current categories form part of different accession treaties.
These derogations will expire in 2009 and in any case will be invalid if this proposal is adopted.
These derogations will expire in 2009 and in any case will be invalid if this proposal is adopted.
Rapporteur’s opinion and conclusions
Rapporteur’s opinion and conclusions
The rapporteur welcomes the increased flexibility in the definition of drinking milk.
The rapporteur welcomes the increased flexibility in the definition of drinking milk.
The consumer’s options and freedom of choice are increased.
The consumer’s options and freedom of choice are increased.
The proposed liberalisation measures may lead to a revival in intra-Community trade in milk products.
The proposed liberalisation measures may lead to a revival in intra-Community trade in milk products.
The rapporteur also welcomes the fact that the proposal contributes to simplifying European agricultural policy and its implementation as it makes many transitional provisions and derogations unnecessary.
The rapporteur also welcomes the fact that the proposal contributes to simplifying European agricultural policy and its implementation as it makes many transitional provisions and derogations unnecessary.
The rapporteur is nevertheless concerned that allowing the production and marketing of drinking milk products outside the three current categories may lead to confusion and uncertainty for the consumer owing to the vagueness of the proposal for labelling.
The rapporteur is nevertheless concerned that allowing the production and marketing of drinking milk products outside the three current categories may lead to confusion and uncertainty for the consumer owing to the vagueness of the proposal for labelling.
The rapporteur would like an unambiguous link between the product description and the existing labelling rules.
The rapporteur would like an unambiguous link between the product description and the existing labelling rules.
Clearer and unambiguous product descriptions must therefore be sought.
Clearer and unambiguous product descriptions must therefore be sought.
In addition the rapporteur feels that it is not necessary to allow a margin of tolerance of ‘±0.2%’ for the fat content indication.
In addition the rapporteur feels that it is not necessary to allow a margin of tolerance of ‘±0.2%’ for the fat content indication.
This rule does not lead to clarity and makes harmonised implementation more difficult.
This rule does not lead to clarity and makes harmonised implementation more difficult.
Therefore, despite her general support for the Commission’s proposal for a more flexible approach, the rapporteur suggests making a few minor changes to the labelling and doing without the ‘±0.2%’ margin of tolerance.
Therefore, despite her general support for the Commission’s proposal for a more flexible approach, the rapporteur suggests making a few minor changes to the labelling and doing without the ‘±0.2%’ margin of tolerance.
Допълнителни правила за общата организация на пазара на мляко и млечни продукти (изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 2597/1997 г.)
Additional rules on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products for drinking milk (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 2597/97)
PE 390.757v02-00
PE 390.757v02-00
ПРОЕКТ НА ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛНА РЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ....5
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION...............................................5
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................7
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT.........................................................................................................7
относно предложението за решение на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (EО) № 1059/2003 за установяване на обща класификация на териториалните единици за статистически цели (NUTS) поради присъединяването на България и Румъния към Европейския съюз
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и Съвета ( COM(2007)0095 ))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0095 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 285, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0091/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0091/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по регионално развитие ( A6‑0285/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0285/2007 ),
СЪОБРАЖЕНИЕ 4а (ново)
RECITAL 4a (new)
(4а) Доколкото целите на настоящия регламент, а именно създаването на общи статистически стандарти, които да позволяват изготвяне на хармонизирани данни, не могат да бъдат осъществени в достатъчна степен от държавите-членки самостоятелно и следователно могат да бъдат по-добре осъществени на общностно равнище, Общността може да приеме мерки в съответствие с принципа на субсидиарност, установен в член 5 от Договора.
(4 a) Since the objectives of this Regulation, namely the creation of common statistical standards that permit the production of harmonised data, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting alone and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
В съответствие с принципа на пропорционалност, както е установен в същия член, съдържащите с в настоящия регламент мерки не надхвърлят необходимото за постигане на тези цели.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve those objectives.
Между вписванията за Белгия и Чешката република се вмъква следното:
The following is inserted between Belgium and the Czech Republic:
„за България „ Населени места (Naseleni mesta) “,“
“for Bulgaria ‘ Населени места (Naseleni mesta) ’,”
Между вписванията за Белгия и Чешката република се добавя следното:
The following is inserted between Belgium and the Czech Republic:
„за България „ Общини (Obshtini) “,“
“for Bulgaria ‘ Общини (Obshtini) ’, ”
Regional statistics are used at Community level as an objective statistical base for a number of very diverse purposes.
Regional statistics are used at Community level as an objective statistical base for a number of very diverse purposes.
Major political importance attaches to some of these, e.g. the determination of the areas eligible for the Structural Funds or for state aids (in the latter case, subject to compatibility with Articles 87 to 89 of the EC Treaty).
Major political importance attaches to some of these, e.g. the determination of the areas eligible for the Structural Funds or for state aids (in the latter case, subject to compatibility with Articles 87 to 89 of the EC Treaty).
Regulation EC 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council establishes a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) based on demographic criteria, pursuant to the Community's need for a suitable legal basis for such classification.
Regulation EC 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and the Council establishes a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) based on demographic criteria, pursuant to the Community's need for a suitable legal basis for such classification.
Regional statistics are a cornerstone of the European statistical system, being used for a wide range of purposes and by a wide range of users.
Regional statistics are a cornerstone of the European statistical system, being used for a wide range of purposes and by a wide range of users.
For instance, regional data of the EU Member States are used for allocating structural funds in a rational and consistent way.
For instance, regional data of the EU Member States are used for allocating structural funds in a rational and consistent way.
Hence, regional statistics are the objective statistical base for important political decisions.
Hence, regional statistics are the objective statistical base for important political decisions.
The work on a Regulation to give NUTS a legal status started in spring 2000, with the adoption and entering into force in 2003 of the above mentioned Regulation.
The work on a Regulation to give NUTS a legal status started in spring 2000, with the adoption and entering into force in 2003 of the above mentioned Regulation.
The current NUTS breakdown subdivides each Member State into a number of regions at NUTS 1 level.
The current NUTS breakdown subdivides each Member State into a number of regions at NUTS 1 level.
Each of these is then subdivided into regions at NUTS level 2, and these in turn into regions at NUTS level 3.
Each of these is then subdivided into regions at NUTS level 2, and these in turn into regions at NUTS level 3.
The European Parliament has urged for including a fourth NUTS category (see for example report A5-0071/2003 ; rapporteur: Rosa Miguélez Ramos) in order to cover smaller territorial units.
The European Parliament has urged for including a fourth NUTS category (see for example report A5-0071/2003 ; rapporteur: Rosa Miguélez Ramos) in order to cover smaller territorial units.
In order to meet a growing general need for information at local level, the Commission set up an infra-regional information system, the first step being to compile a Community classification of local administrative units ("LAU") compatible with NUTS.
In order to meet a growing general need for information at local level, the Commission set up an infra-regional information system, the first step being to compile a Community classification of local administrative units ("LAU") compatible with NUTS.
Accordingly, the LAU are the basic components of NUTS regions.
Accordingly, the LAU are the basic components of NUTS regions.
Following this, two further LAU levels have been defined in accordance with the NUTS principles, but only the last and smallest (LAU level 2) has been fixed for all Member States.
Following this, two further LAU levels have been defined in accordance with the NUTS principles, but only the last and smallest (LAU level 2) has been fixed for all Member States.
This usually corresponds to the concept of the 'municipality' or 'commune'.
This usually corresponds to the concept of the 'municipality' or 'commune'.
With the approach of a large number of new Member States entering the Union, the criteria was set to clarify the reference territorial units (NUTS) in order to define a consistent regional breakdown of territory for statistical purposes.
With the approach of a large number of new Member States entering the Union, the criteria was set to clarify the reference territorial units (NUTS) in order to define a consistent regional breakdown of territory for statistical purposes.
This purely technical aspect had in fact major implications for local and regional governments.
This purely technical aspect had in fact major implications for local and regional governments.
In 2005, the Commission presented a Communication as provided for in art 2(5) of the above mentioned Regulation EC 1059/2003, on the appropriateness of establishing rules on a Europe-wide basis for more detailed levels in the NUTS Classification ( COM(2005)0473 ).
In 2005, the Commission presented a Communication as provided for in art 2(5) of the above mentioned Regulation EC 1059/2003, on the appropriateness of establishing rules on a Europe-wide basis for more detailed levels in the NUTS Classification ( COM(2005)0473 ).
The Commission concludes in its Communication (COM(2005)473 final) that, currently, no additional level of regional breakdown should be envisaged in the framework of the NUTS Regulation.
The Commission concludes in its Communication (COM(2005)473 final) that, currently, no additional level of regional breakdown should be envisaged in the framework of the NUTS Regulation.
The European Commission proposal for a regulation
The European Commission proposal for a regulation
The Commission is proposing to amend Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU.
The Commission is proposing to amend Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU.
The amending Regulation coherently follows a previous one, Regulation (EC) No 1888/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council due to the accession of ten Member States in 2004.
The amending Regulation coherently follows a previous one, Regulation (EC) No 1888/2005 of the European Parliament and the Council due to the accession of ten Member States in 2004.
According to your rapporteur, it is necessary to integrate, in line with the Commission proposal, the classification of the territorial units of Bulgaria and Romania into the statistical classification of the Community.
According to your rapporteur, it is necessary to integrate, in line with the Commission proposal, the classification of the territorial units of Bulgaria and Romania into the statistical classification of the Community.
He therefore welcomes the Commission's initiative regarding adaptation of the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council in this regard.
He therefore welcomes the Commission's initiative regarding adaptation of the annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council in this regard.
Your rapporteur does not consider it necessary to table amendments to the Commission proposal.
Your rapporteur does not consider it necessary to table amendments to the Commission proposal.
Nonetheless, as has been stressed by the European Parliament earlier, certain elements should be highlighted such as the treatment of smaller administrative units.
Nonetheless, as has been stressed by the European Parliament earlier, certain elements should be highlighted such as the treatment of smaller administrative units.
A NUTS level for 'smaller administrative units' would make it possible to reflect real circumstances more accurately and avoid anomalies such as the presence of regional units with highly differing populations within the same NUTS level.
A NUTS level for 'smaller administrative units' would make it possible to reflect real circumstances more accurately and avoid anomalies such as the presence of regional units with highly differing populations within the same NUTS level.
Your rapporteur therefore strongly encourages the Commission, as also mentioned in the Communication (COM(2005)473 final), to reassess the situation during the year to come, which follows the start of the new Cohesion Policy period, in order to look closer at the prospects of creating another NUTS level.
Your rapporteur therefore strongly encourages the Commission, as also mentioned in the Communication (COM(2005)473 final), to reassess the situation during the year to come, which follows the start of the new Cohesion Policy period, in order to look closer at the prospects of creating another NUTS level.
Attention should, however, be paid concerning Annex 3 as amended which do not strictly follows the population criteria with regard to two regions in Romania, named non-administrative in the regulation.
Attention should, however, be paid concerning Annex 3 as amended which do not strictly follows the population criteria with regard to two regions in Romania, named non-administrative in the regulation.
Since this appeared the best classification to make for the sake of continuity of statistical data, and since, this classification was also agreed upon by concerned authorities, your rapporteur does not see any need to propose other classification.
Since this appeared the best classification to make for the sake of continuity of statistical data, and since, this classification was also agreed upon by concerned authorities, your rapporteur does not see any need to propose other classification.
However, it would be appropriate to revise this classification in the next revision of current structure.
However, it would be appropriate to revise this classification in the next revision of current structure.
Furthermore, your rapporteur recommends the harmonisation of LAU level 1 to be supported actively by the Commission at a European scale.
Furthermore, your rapporteur recommends the harmonisation of LAU level 1 to be supported actively by the Commission at a European scale.
This could be done through exchange of views between statistical offices, encouraged and supported by the Commission, and the elaboration of guiding principle to harmonise the concepts with regard to the definition of LAU level 1 regions.
This could be done through exchange of views between statistical offices, encouraged and supported by the Commission, and the elaboration of guiding principle to harmonise the concepts with regard to the definition of LAU level 1 regions.