natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Concern has been expressed in the Parliament’s Working Document regarding the credibility of the CE marking.
Concern has been expressed in the Parliament’s Working Document regarding the credibility of the CE marking.
We do not believe that any such credibility gap stems from two points, firstly an inadequate process for catching those economic operators who deliberately flout Community legislation, and secondly an inadequate process to follow-up to ensure that, where a product has been found by a Court to be non-compliant, then it is positively removed from the market.
We do not believe that any such credibility gap stems from two points, firstly an inadequate process for catching those economic operators who deliberately flout Community legislation, and secondly an inadequate process to follow-up to ensure that, where a product has been found by a Court to be non-compliant, then it is positively removed from the market.
Hence, market surveillance procedures should also ensure a concrete follow-up of corrective actions on the market place.
Hence, market surveillance procedures should also ensure a concrete follow-up of corrective actions on the market place.
As market surveillance is organised at Member State level in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, this Regulation should require each Member State to verify that corrective actions have been effectively carried out.
As market surveillance is organised at Member State level in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, this Regulation should require each Member State to verify that corrective actions have been effectively carried out .
Член 16, параграф 2, алинея 1 a (нова)
Article 16, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Държавите-членки определят подходящи процедури с цел да се провери ефективното провеждане на корективни действия.
Member States shall establish adequate procedures in order to verify that corrective actions have been effectively carried out.
Siehe Begründung zu Änderungsantrag 3.
See justification under amendment 3.
Държавите-членки създават, прилагат и периодично актуализират програмите за наблюдение на пазара.
Member States shall establish, implement and periodically update market surveillance programmes.
Държавите-членки могат да сключат споразумения за сътрудничество със заинтересованите страни, по-специално с професионални организации в отделните сектори, за да се възползват от наличното проучване на пазара.
Member States may establish co-operation agreements with stakeholders, in particular with sectoral professional organisations, in order to take advantage of available market intelligence.
Държавите-членки периодично преглеждат и оценяват изпълнението на дейностите си по наблюдението.
Member States shall periodically review and assess the functioning of their surveillance activities.
Държавите-членки периодично преглеждат и оценяват изпълнението на дейностите си по наблюдението и предоставят докладите за това на разположение на обществеността .
Member States shall periodically review and assess the functioning of their surveillance activities and report publicly thereon .
Член 17, параграф 1, алинея 1 a (нова)
Article 17, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Органите са упълномощени да вземат мостри от продукт, който очакват да бъде бързо разпродаден.
The authorities shall be entitled to seize samples of a product which they expect to be rapidly sold out.
Market surveillance speed should be adapted to the speed of sales of batches of often inexpensive components or consumer products: these are often rapidly sold out in a distributor’s promotional sale.
Market surveillance speed should be adapted to the speed of sales of batches of often inexpensive components or consumer products: these are often rapidly sold out in a distributor’s promotional sale.
Experience shows that once products are placed on the market, delays between complaints and action by market surveillance authorities often lead to the situation where authorities are not in a position to carry out checks, as the products have already been sold.
Experience shows that once products are placed on the market, delays between complaints and action by market surveillance authorities often lead to the situation where authorities are not in a position to carry out checks, as the products have already been sold.
This is particularly the case for promotional or seasonal sales of consumer products, such as Christmas lighting.
This is particularly the case for promotional or seasonal sales of consumer products, such as Christmas lighting.
It happens also for small electrical components such as electrical controls, switchgears or small measuring instruments.
It happens also for small electrical components such as electrical controls, switchgears or small measuring instruments.
Therefore, when customs authorities have a serious reason to believe that the imported product may not be in compliance with all EU requirements, they should be entitled to seize samples of the product in order to speed up the control by market surveillance authorities and ensure possible legal action against the importer or the manufacturer’s authorised representative in case of characterised default of compliance with EU legislation.
Therefore, when customs authorities have a serious reason to believe that the imported product may not be in compliance with all EU requirements, they should be entitled to seize samples of the product in order to speed up the control by market surveillance authorities and ensure possible legal action against the importer or the manufacturer’s authorised representative in case of characterised default of compliance with EU legislation.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че всички предприети мерки съгласно съответното законодателство на Общността за хармонизация и принципа на пропорционалност , с цел забрана или ограничение на предлагането на продукт, оттеглянето или изземването му от пазара, отразяват точно основанието, на което са базирани.
Member States shall ensure that any measure taken, pursuant to the relevant Community harmonisation legislation and the principle of proportionality, to prohibit or restrict the making available of a product, to withdraw it from the market or recall it, states the exact grounds on which it is based.
Artikel 19 Absatz 1 sieht eine Reihe möglicher Marktinterventionen der Behörden vor, die jeweils unterschiedliche wirtschaftliche Auswirkungen für die Wirtschaftsakteure haben werden.
Article 19(1) contains a number of possible market interventions that could be taken by authorities and the economic consequences resulting from each of these will have varying consequences for economic operators.
In Übereinstimmung mit den allgemeinen Vorschriften des Gemeinschaftsrechts sollte das Ausmaß der Marktintervention im Verhältnis zur Höhe des Risikos für die Öffentlichkeit stehen.
In line with the general provisions of Community law, the level of market intervention should be proportionate to the level of risk for the public.
Ähnlich lautende Bestimmungen finden sich bereits in der Richtlinie über die allgemeine Produktsicherheit.
Provisions with similar effect are already contained within the General Product Safety Directive.
Член 24, параграф 1, алинея 1 a (нова)
Article 24, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 a (new)
Държавите-членки гарантират, че техните митнически власти имат необходимите пълномощия и средства, за да изпълняват надлежно задачите си.
Member States shall ensure that their customs authorities have the necessary powers and resources in order to properly perform their tasks .
Im Interesse der Kohärenz und Effizienz des gesamten Rechtsrahmens für die Vermarktung von Produkten schlägt der Verfasser der Stellungnahme vor, für die Zollkontrollen eine ähnliche Bestimmung vorzusehen, wie sie in Artikel 16 Absatz 3 für die Marktüberwachungsbehörden vorgesehen ist.
For the sake of consistency and efficiency of the overall framework for the marketing of goods, the draftsman suggests the introduction of a similar provision for customs controls as for market surveillance authorities under Article 16(3).
Die interessierten Kreise sollten von der Kommission bei der Aufstellung der Leitlinien für die Durchführung angehört werden.
Stakeholders should be consulted by the Commission when setting up implementation guidelines.
Когато в държава-членка акредитация не се извършва от един единствен национален орган по акредитация и когато държава-членка възнамерява да продължи да извършва акредитация, тя извършва необходимите структурни адаптации с цел да създаде единствен национален орган по акредитация най-късно до 1 януари 2010 г.
Where in a Member State accreditation is not operated by a single national accreditation body and that Member State intends to continue to operate accreditation, it shall make the necessary structural adaptations in order to establish a single national accreditation body by 1 January 2010 at the latest.
Когато в държава-членка акредитация не се извършва от един единствен национален орган по акредитация и когато държава-членка възнамерява да продължи да извършва акредитация, тя извършва необходимите структурни адаптации с цел да създаде единствен, респ. допълнителен, съгласно член 4, параграф 1, алинея 1а, национален орган по акредитация най-късно до 1 януари 2014 г.
Where in a Member State accreditation is not operated by a single national accreditation body and that Member State intends to continue to operate accreditation, it shall make the necessary structural adaptations in order to establish a national accreditation body or a second national accreditation body pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 4(1) by 1 January 2014 at the latest.
Zudem muss die Übergangsfrist für die erforderlichen rechtlichen und verwaltungstechnischen Umsetzungsmaßnahmen verlängert werden.
In addition, the transitional period for the legal and administrative implementing measures required must be extended.
Insbesondere in Ländern mit komplexen Akkreditierungssystemen sind diese Änderungen nicht bis 2010 zu realisieren und deshalb sollte die Frist bis 2014 verlängert werden.
Particularly in countries with complex accreditation systems, these changes cannot be made by 2010 and the transitional period should therefore be extended to 2014.
Глава III се прилага, считано от един месец след датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент.
Chapter III shall apply with effect from one month after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Es ist nicht akzeptabel, dass es weitere zwei Jahre dauern soll, bis für die Marktüberwachung die effizienten Bedingungen gelten, die hierfür dringend erforderlich sind.
An additional two years’ delay until market surveillance can operate under the urgently needed efficient conditions is not acceptable.
Hersteller, die die europäischen Rechtsvorschriften und Standards einhalten, sehen sich derzeit durch unlautere Konkurrenz einer schweren Benachteiligung ausgesetzt .
Manufacturers who do respect European legislation and standards currently face heavy threats from unfair competitors .
Alfonso Andria, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Duarte Freitas, Milan Gaľa, Alojz Peterle
Alfonso Andria, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Duarte Freitas, Milan Gaľa, Alojz Peterle
The draftsman welcomes the proposal for a regulation on the accreditation and market surveillance of products in the Community, and the accompanying proposal for a decision on a common framework for the marketing of products.
The draftsman welcomes the proposal for a regulation on the accreditation and market surveillance of products in the Community, and the accompanying proposal for a decision on a common framework for the marketing of products.
The Regulation builds upon systems already existing in Member States; introduces strengthened rules on market surveillance to filter unsafe products, including imports; and strengthens the role of accreditation for conformity assessment bodies thus enhancing confidence in product conformity assessment.
The Regulation builds upon systems already existing in Member States; introduces strengthened rules on market surveillance to filter unsafe products, including imports; and strengthens the role of accreditation for conformity assessment bodies thus enhancing confidence in product conformity assessment.
Though the draftsman, as stated above, welcomes the proposals, he is of the opinion that there is room for further improvement and therefore proposes amendments along the following lines:
Though the draftsman, as stated above, welcomes the proposals, he is of the opinion that there is room for further improvement and therefore proposes amendments along the following lines:
§ Some definitions, such as "making available on the market" and "entering the Community market" must be clarified; new definitions on "conformity assessment"; "conformity assessment body" have to be introduced; coherence of definitions in the Regulation and the Decision must be ensured.
§ Some definitions, such as “making available on the market” and “entering the Community market” must be clarified; new definitions on “conformity assessment”; “conformity assessment body” have to be introduced; coherence of definitions in the Regulation and the Decision must be ensured.
Article 2 of the Regulation is therefore amended accordingly.
Article 2 of the Regulation is therefore amended accordingly.
§ Concerning the institutional side: the rules of cross-border accreditation should be simplified, while at the same time ensuring that increased cross-border competition does not result in lower accreditation standards; national consumer protection organizations should be involved in the cooperation among competent national authorities; customs authorities, which are the first line of defence with imports, have to be reinforced and equipped with adequate resources.
§ Concerning the institutional side: the rules of cross-border accreditation should be simplified, while at the same time ensuring that increased cross-border competition does not result in lower accreditation standards; national consumer protection organizations should be involved in the cooperation among competent national authorities; customs authorities, which are the first line of defence with imports, have to be reinforced and equipped with adequate resources.
Articles 6 and 24 of the Regulation are therefore amended this way.
Articles 6 and 24 of the Regulation are therefore amended this way.
§ Provisions of the existing directives concerning identification numbers and lists of notified bodies have been updated in order to give immediate legal certainty to the current practical application of the notification procedure.
§ Provisions of the existing directives concerning identification numbers and lists of notified bodies have been updated in order to give immediate legal certainty to the current practical application of the notification procedure.
§ As far as procedures are concerned: certain rights of the competent authorities (e.g. the right to take samples of products even before receiving complaints) have to be reinforced; in order to avoid unnecessary red tape burdens, other factors such as the size of the company, the relative complexity of the technology used, and whether or not a product is a result of unit or series production should be taken into account when carrying out conformity procedures.
§ As far as procedures are concerned: certain rights of the competent authorities (e.g. the right to take samples of products even before receiving complaints) have to be reinforced; in order to avoid unnecessary red tape burdens, other factors such as the size of the company, the relative complexity of the technology used, and whether or not a product is a result of unit or series production should be taken into account when carrying out conformity procedures.
Articles 2, 7, and 17 of the Regulation are amended in this way.
Articles 2, 7, and 17 of the Regulation are amended in this way.
Also, the economic impact should be considered before authorities decide to recall a product - any action taken should be proportionate to the level of risk.
Also, the economic impact should be considered before authorities decide to recall a product - any action taken should be proportionate to the level of risk.
Economic operators should also have the right to respond to such a decision, and appeal if necessary.
Economic operators should also have the right to respond to such a decision, and appeal if necessary.
Therefore Articles 2 and 19 have been amended.
Therefore Articles 2 and 19 have been amended.
Article 16 has been amended to call on Member States to ensure there are procedures to verify that corrective actions are actually carried out.
Article 16 has been amended to call on Member States to ensure there are procedures to verify that corrective actions are actually carried out.
§ Recital 30a and Article 34 of the Regulation, as well as Article 14 of the Decision are amended to ensure more involvement of stakeholders and professional organizations.
§ Recital 30a and Article 34 of the Regulation, as well as Article 14 of the Decision are amended to ensure more involvement of stakeholders and professional organizations.
§ In order to avoid having "double standards" (i.e. a set of requirements introduced by Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety (GPSD), and another set introduced by the present proposal) and to ensure the higher level of protection introduced by this proposal, the exemption stipulated in Article 13 (2) of the Regulation should be deleted.
§ In order to avoid having “double standards” (i.e. a set of requirements introduced by Directive 2001/95/EC on general product safety (GPSD), and another set introduced by the present proposal) and to ensure the higher level of protection introduced by this proposal, the exemption stipulated in Article 13 (2) of the Regulation should be deleted.
Also, exceptions listed in Article 1 of the Decision should be deleted as this is a sui generis decision directed towards the legislator and therefore not directly applicable.
Also, exceptions listed in Article 1 of the Decision should be deleted as this is a sui generis decision directed towards the legislator and therefore not directly applicable.
In order to have these rules applied straight away and not to make them subject to future national legislation, Articles 16-17 of the Decision should be placed in the Regulation.
In order to have these rules applied straight away and not to make them subject to future national legislation, Articles 16-17 of the Decision should be placed in the Regulation.
§ Article 4 and 16 have been amended to emphasise the importance of transparency in decision-making and the independence of market surveillance authorities.
§ Article 4 and 16 have been amended to emphasise the importance of transparency in decision-making and the independence of market surveillance authorities.
(23) Директива 2001/95/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно общата безопасност на продуктите създаде рамка за наблюдение на пазара и административно сътрудничество по отношение на потребителски продукти.
(23) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety has set up a market surveillance and administrative cooperation framework in respect of consumer products.
Разпоредбите на настоящия регламент относно наблюдението на пазара не се прилагат по отношение на продукти, както е определено в член 2, буква а) от Директива 2001/95/ЕО, когато се засягат здравето и безопасността на потребителите.
The provisions of this Regulation on market surveillance should not apply in relation to products, as defined in Article 2(a) of Directive 2001/95/EC, in so far as the health and safety of consumers is concerned .
In order to avoid having "double standards" (i.e. a set of requirements introduced by Directive 2001/95/EC (General Product Safety Directive), and another set introduced by the present proposal) and to ensure the higher level of protection introduced by this proposal, this exemption should be deleted.
In order to avoid having “double standards” (i.e. a set of requirements introduced by Directive 2001/95/EC (General Product Safety Directive), and another set introduced by the present proposal) and to ensure the higher level of protection introduced by this proposal, this exemption should be deleted.
The borderline between products for consumer use and for professional use is blurred, and such distinction could lead to unclear procedures and responsibilities.
The borderline between products for consumer use and for professional use is blurred, and such distinction could lead to unclear procedures and responsibilities.
Therefore Article 13 paragraph 2 and the corresponding Recital have to be deleted.
Therefore Article 13 paragraph 2 and the corresponding Recital have to be deleted.
(24) Сътрудничеството на компетентните органи на национално и на трансгранично равнище при обмен на информация, разследване на нарушения и предприемане на действия за тяхното спиране е от съществено значение за защитата на здравето и безопасността и за гарантиране нормалното функциониране на вътрешния пазар.
(24) Cooperation of competent authorities at the national level and across borders in exchanging information, investigating infringements and taking action to bring about their cessation is essential to the protection of health and safety and to guaranteeing the smooth functioning of the internal market.
(30a) Държавите-членки могат да счетат за полезно да сключат споразумения за сътрудничество със заинтересовани страни, в частност с професионални браншови организации, с цел възползване от наличните сведения за пазара при създаването, прилагането и осъвременяването на програми за наблюдение на пазара.
(30a) Member States may find it useful to establish co-operation agreements with stakeholders, in particular with sectoral professional organisations, in order to take advantage of available market intelligence when establishing, implementing and updating market surveillance programmes.
(30б) Държавите-членки следва да осигурят подходящи процедури за обжалване по отношение на мерки, взети от компетентни органи, които ограничават пускането на продукти на пазара или изискват тяхното изтегляне или изземване.
(30b) Member States should ensure adequate appeal procedures in respect of measures taken by competent authorities which restrict the placing on the market of products or require their withdrawal or recall.
If a Member State asks a manufacturer to recall a product, which is later found to be compliant, the economic operator should have access to appeal from the Member State(s) who made the demand.
If a Member State asks a manufacturer to recall a product, which is later found to be compliant, the economic operator should have access to appeal from the Member State(s) who made the demand.
This text is based on Recital 37 of the General Product Safety Directive and, as such, is not a new or untried concept.
This text is based on Recital 37 of the General Product Safety Directive and, as such, is not a new or untried concept.
Съображение 36 a (ново)
Recital 36 a (new)
(36a) Маркировката CE, която удостоверява съответствието на даден продукт с изискванията, е видимият резултат от цялостен процес по оценяване, създаден за проверка на съответствието в най-широк смисъл.
(36a) The CE marking, evidencing the conformity of a product, is the visible consequence of a complete assessment process designed to verify conformity in a broad sense.
Поради това в настоящия регламент следва да се посочат общите принципи за използване на маркировката CE и правилата, отнасящи се до нейното поставяне, които следва да се съблюдават при прилагането на общностното законодателство, което хармонизира употребата на гореспоменатата маркировка.
General principles governing the use of the CE marking and rules as to its affixing, which should apply in the application of Community legislation harmonising the use of that marking, should therefore be laid down in this Regulation.