natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
На съдържанието на споразумението може да бъде придадена изпълнителна сила посредством съдебно решение, решение, автентичен съдебен акт или автентичен акт на друг компетентен орган в съответствие със законодателството на държавата-членка, в която е отправена молбата.
The content of the agreement may be made enforceable in a judgment or a decision or by an authentic act by a court or other competent authority in accordance with the law of the Member State where the request is made.
Държавите-членки уведомяват Комисията за съдилищата или публичните органи, които са компетентни да приемат молби по параграф 1 .
Member States shall inform the Commission of the courts or public authorities that are competent for receiving a request in accordance with paragraph 1 .
Държавите-членки уведомяват Комисията за съдилищата или други органи, които са компетентни да приемат молби по параграфи 1 и 1а .
Member States shall inform the Commission of the courts or other authorities that are competent to receive a request in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 1a .
Никоя от предвидените в настоящия член разпоредби не засяга приложимите норми за признаване и изпълнение в друга държава-членка на постигнатите след медиация споразумения, на които е придадена изпълнителна сила в съответствие с параграф 1.
Nothing in this Article shall affect the rules applicable to the recognition and enforcement in another Member State of agreements reached by mediation which have been made enforceable in accordance with paragraph 1.
Допустимост на доказателствата в гражданския процес
Admissibility of evidence in civil judicial proceedings
Медиаторите и всяко лице, участващо в провеждането на медиация, не могат да дават свидетелски показания и да предоставят доказателства в гражданско производство по никой от следните въпроси:
Mediators, as well as any person involved in the administration of mediation services, shall not in civil judicial proceedings give testimony or evidence regarding any of the following:
а) покана за започване на медиация от една от страните или готовност на една от страните за започване на медиация;
(a) An invitation by a party to engage in mediation or the fact that a party was willing to participate in mediation;
б) изказани мнения или отправени предложения от страна по медиационна процедура във връзка с евентуалното разрешаване на спора;
(b) Views expressed or suggestions made by a party in a mediation in respect of a possible settlement of the dispute;
в) изявления или признания, направени от страна по време на медиацията;
(c) Statements or admissions made by a party in the course of the mediation;
г) предложения, отправени от медиатора;
(d) Proposals made by the mediator;
д) изявена готовност от дадена страна да приеме предложение за разрешаване на спора, отправено от медиатора;
(e) The fact that a party had indicated its willingness to accept a proposal for a settlement made by the mediator;
е) документ, изготвен единствено за целите на медиацията .
(f) A document prepared solely for purposes of the mediation.
Параграф 1 се прилага независимо от формата на посочените в него доказателства или информация.
Paragraph 1 shall apply irrespective of the form of the information or evidence referred to therein.
Разкриването на посочената в параграф 1 информация не може да бъде разпоредено от съд или друг съдебен орган в рамките на гражданско производство, а в случай че такава информация бъде предложена като доказателство в нарушение на параграф 1, то ще се счита за недопустимо .
The disclosure of the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall not be ordered by a court or other judicial authority in civil judicial proceedings and, if such information is offered as evidence in contravention of paragraph 1, that evidence shall be treated as inadmissible.
Независимо от това такава информация може да бъде разкривана или допускана като доказателство:
Nevertheless, such information may be disclosed or admitted in evidence;
а) доколкото това е необходимо за прилагането или изпълнението на споразумение за разрешаване на спор, постигнато непосредствено в резултат от медиацията,
(a) to the extent required for the purposes of implementation or enforcement of a settlement agreement reached as a direct result of the mediation,
б) по неотложни съображения, свързани с обществения ред и в частност за да се осигури закрилата на деца или да се предотврати посегателство над физическата или психологическата неприкосновеност на дадено лице, или
(b) for overriding considerations of public policy, in particular when required to ensure the protection of children or to prevent harm to the physical or psychological integrity of a person, or
в) ако медиаторът и страните се споразумеят за това .
(c) if the mediator and the parties agree thereto.
Разпоредбите на параграфи 1, 2 и 3 се прилагат независимо от това дали съдебното производство се отнася или не до спора, който е или е бил обект на медиация.
The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall apply whether or not the judicial proceedings relate to the dispute that is or was the subject matter of the mediation.
При условията на параграф 1, доказателства, които по принцип са допустими в съдебно производство, не престават да бъдат допустими поради използването им в рамките на процедура по медиация .
Subject to paragraph 1, evidence that is otherwise admissible in judicial proceedings does not become inadmissible as a consequence of having been used in a mediation.
Член 6 a (нов)
Article 6 a (new)
Член 6а
Article 6a
Поверителен характер на медиацията
Confidentiality of mediation
Предвид обстоятелството, че медиацията следва да се провежда при условията на поверителност, държавите-членки гарантират, че, ако страните не са договорили друго, нито медиаторите, нито страните, нито лицата, участващи в ръководството на процедурата по медиация, имат право или са длъжни да разкриват пред трети лица или да предоставят, чрез даване на свидетелски показания в хода на граждански и търговски съдебни производства или арбитражни производства, сведения, произтичащи от или във връзка с медиация, освен:
Given that mediation is intended to take place in a manner which respects confidentiality, Member States shall ensure that, unless the parties agree otherwise, neither mediators nor parties nor those involved in the administration of the mediation process are entitled or compelled to disclose to third parties, or to give evidence in civil and commercial judicial proceedings or arbitration regarding, information arising out of or in connection with a mediation except:
а) поради преимуществени съображения, свързани с обществения ред или други съществени причини, по-конкретно, когато е необходимо да се осигури закрилата на интересите на деца или да се предотврати посегателство над физическата или психологическата неприкосновеност на дадено лице; или
(a) for overriding considerations of public policy or other substantial reasons, in particular where necessary in order to ensure the protection of the best interests of children or to prevent harm to the physical or mental integrity of a person; or
б) когато разкриването на сведения е необходимо за прилагането или привеждането в изпълнение на постигнатото след медиация споразумение.
(b) where disclosure is necessary in order to implement or enforce the agreement resulting from mediation.
Никоя от разпоредбите в параграф 1 не възпрепятства държавите-членки да прилагат по-строги мерки за защита на поверителния характер на медиацията.
Nothing in paragraph 1 shall preclude Member States from enacting stricter measures to protect the confidentiality of mediation.
Давностният срок за погасяване на претенцията, която е обект на медиация, спира да тече от момента, в който след възникване на спора :
The running of any period of prescription or limitation regarding the claim that is the subject matter of the mediation shall be suspended as of when, after the dispute has arisen :
С цел да се гарантира, че страни, избрали метода на медиация в опит да разрешат спор, не са възпрепятствани впоследствие да образуват съдебно производство във връзка със същия спор поради изтичането на давностни срокове, държавите-членки гарантират, че такива срокове не текат между :
In order to ensure that parties who choose mediation with a view to resolving a dispute are not prevented from subsequently initiating judicial proceedings in relation to that dispute by the expiry of periods of limitation or prescription, Member States shall ensure that any such period does not expire between :
а) страните се споразумеят относно провеждането на медиация,
(a) the parties agree to use mediation,
а) датата, на която страните се споразумеят писмено, след възникването на спора, да използват медиация или, при отсъствие на такова писмено споразумение, датата, на която същите присъстват на първата медиационна среща, или датата, на която съгласно националното законодателство възниква задължение за използване на медиация; и
(a) the date when the parties agree in writing, after the dispute has arisen, to have recourse to mediation or, in the absence of such written agreement, the date on which they attend the first mediation meeting, or the date on which an obligation to resort to mediation arises under national law; and
б) провеждането на медиация бъде разпоредено от съда, или
(b) the use of mediation is ordered by a court, or
б) датата на постигнато след медиация споразумение, датата, на която най-малко една от страните писмено уведоми останалите страни, че медиацията е приключила или, при отсъствие на такова писмено уведомление, датата, на която медиаторът обяви, по собствена инициатива или по искане на най-малко една от страните, че медиацията е приключила.
(b) the date of an agreement reached in mediation, the date on which at least one of the parties informs the others in writing that mediation is terminated or, in the absence of such written notification, the date on which the mediator declares on his or her own initiative or at the request of at least one of the parties that mediation is terminated .
в) възникне задължение за провеждане на медиация съгласно националното законодателство на държава-членка .
(c) an obligation to use mediation arises under the national law of a Member State .
Когато процедурата по медиация приключи без постигане на споразумение, давностният срок започва отново да тече от приключването на медиацията без споразумение, считано от момента, в който едната или двете страни или медиаторът заявят, че медиацията е приключила или се оттеглят ефективно от нея.
Where the mediation has ended without a settlement agreement, the period resumes running from the time the mediation ended without a settlement agreement, counting from the date when one or both of the parties or the mediator declares that the mediation is terminated or effectively withdraws from it.
При всички случаи продължителността на давностния срок е най-малко един месец считано от датата, на която той отново започва да тече, освен когато се отнася за срок за предявяване на иск срещу преустановяване на действието или срещу отменяването на временна мярка или друга подобна мярка .
The period shall in any event extend for at least one month from the date when it resumes running, except when it concerns a period within which an action must be brought to prevent that a provisional or similar measure ceases to have effect or is revoked .
Разпоредбите на параграф 1 не накърняват предвидените в международни споразумения, по които държавите-членки са страни, разпоредби относно давностните срокове, които са несъвместими с разпоредбите на настоящия член.
Paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to provisions on periods of limitation or prescription in international agreements to which Member States are parties which are not compatible with this Article .
Член 7 a (нов)
Article 7 a (new)
Информация за гражданите
Information for citizens
Държавите-членки гарантират наличието на информация за гражданите, по-конкретно на Интернет сайтове, относно начините за осъществяване на връзка с доставчици на медиационни услуги и медиатори по смисъла на определението в член 2, буква б).
Member States shall ensure that information is available to citizens, in particular on Internet sites, on how to contact mediation providers and mediators as defined in Article 2, point (b).
Държавите-членки насърчават адвокатите да информират клиентите си за възможността за използване на медиация.
Member States shall encourage legal practitioners to inform their clients about the possibility of mediation.
Член 7 б (нов)
Article 7 b (new)
Член 7б
Article 7b
Европейски етичен кодекс за медиатори
The European Code of Conduct for Mediators
Комисията публикува Европейски етичен кодекс за медиатори в серия С на Официален вестник на Европейския съюз под формата на известие без правни последици.
The Commission shall publish the European Code of Conduct for Mediators in the C Series of the Official Journal of the European Union as a notice without legal effects.
Whereas it is not the intention to attach any legal effects to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators, it is considered important to publicise it and make it readily accessible.
Whereas it is not the intention to attach any legal effects to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators, it is considered important to publicise it and make it readily accessible.
Член 8 a (нов)
Article 8 a (new)
Не по-късно от ....*, Комисията представя на Европейския парламент, Съвета и Европейския икономически и социален комитет доклад относно прилагането на настоящата директива.
Not later than ...*, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee a report on the application of this Directive.
При необходимост, докладът се съпровожда от предложения за приспособяване на настоящата директива.
If necessary, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to adapt this Directive.
По-конкретно, в доклада се разглежда въздействието на настоящата директива по отношение на развитието на медиацията както при трансгранични, така и при вътрешни спорове.
In particular, the report shall consider the impact of this Directive with regard to the development of mediation in both cross-border and internal cases.
В него се разглежда и въпросът за евентуалната необходимост от предложение за инструмент, чрез който да се извърши допълнителна хармонизация на давностните срокове, с цел да се улесни правилното функциониране на вътрешния пазар.
It shall further consider whether a proposal for an instrument for the further harmonisation of limitation and prescription periods is necessary to facilitate the proper functioning of the internal market.
Член 9, параграф 1
Article 9, paragraph 1
Държавите-членки въвеждат в сила законовите, подзаконови и административни разпоредби , необходими , за да се съобразят с настоящата директива не по-късно от 1 септември 2007 г .
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 1 September 2007 at the latest.
Те незабавно информират Комисията за това.
They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof .
It must be possible to implement the Directive through self-regulation.
It must be possible to implement the Directive through self-regulation.
The rapporteur has always been convinced about the value and interest of alternative dispute resolution, in particular mediation.
The rapporteur has always been convinced about the value and interest of alternative dispute resolution, in particular mediation.
It affords a cheaper, quicker and less stressful alternative to court proceedings for citizens, without removing their right to their day in court as a last resort.
It affords a cheaper, quicker and less stressful alternative to court proceedings for citizens, without removing their right to their day in court as a last resort.
It may also allow parties in dispute to remain in, or even improve, a valuable relationship, which the adversarial nature of litigation might jeopardise.
It may also allow parties in dispute to remain in, or even improve, a valuable relationship, which the adversarial nature of litigation might jeopardise.
It also allows for creative solutions which satisfy parties' real needs.
It also allows for creative solutions which satisfy parties' real needs.
For instance, in medical negligence cases, the injured party often wants an explanation and an apology just as much as he or she seeks compensation.
For instance, in medical negligence cases, the injured party often wants an explanation and an apology just as much as he or she seeks compensation.
The very nature of litigation is apt to frustrate those needs.
The very nature of litigation is apt to frustrate those needs.
However, the rapporteur initially questioned the need for a directive at a time when mediation systems across the EU are still in an embryonic phase in some Member States.
However, the rapporteur initially questioned the need for a directive at a time when mediation systems across the EU are still in an embryonic phase in some Member States.
Moreover, in order to be effective, mediation must be flexible.
Moreover, in order to be effective, mediation must be flexible.
Any attempt to "regulate" mediation could stifle its development.
Any attempt to "regulate" mediation could stifle its development.
However, as a result of her on-line consultation and the evidence presented by the experts invited to the committee's hearing, the rapporteur recognises that there is overwhelming support for the principle of having a directive.
However, as a result of her on-line consultation and the evidence presented by the experts invited to the committee's hearing, the rapporteur recognises that there is overwhelming support for the principle of having a directive.
She notes that even those experts who were sceptical about the directive or critical of its legal basis were enthusiastic about mediation as an alternative means of providing access to justice.
She notes that even those experts who were sceptical about the directive or critical of its legal basis were enthusiastic about mediation as an alternative means of providing access to justice.
Her objective therefore has been to create a workable, light-touch directive, which reflects existing guidelines and best practice and can serve to encourage the wider use of mediation across the EU.
Her objective therefore has been to create a workable, light-touch directive, which reflects existing guidelines and best practice and can serve to encourage the wider use of mediation across the EU.
She would take this opportunity to thank the experts who took part in their hearing for their willingness to provide drafting suggestions after the hearing, some of which she has drawn upon in drafting the report.
She would take this opportunity to thank the experts who took part in their hearing for their willingness to provide drafting suggestions after the hearing, some of which she has drawn upon in drafting the report.
In the amendments, the rapporteur has sought to clarify and improve on the original proposal, in particular by modifying the definitions of mediator and mediation.
In the amendments, the rapporteur has sought to clarify and improve on the original proposal, in particular by modifying the definitions of mediator and mediation.
She is particularly concerned to ensure that quality standards are ensured, especially by including references to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators.
She is particularly concerned to ensure that quality standards are ensured, especially by including references to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators.
She has amended the provisions on recognition and enforcement to make sure that they are legally watertight and respect the legal traditions of the various Member States.
She has amended the provisions on recognition and enforcement to make sure that they are legally watertight and respect the legal traditions of the various Member States.
As far as confidentiality is concerned, the solution proposed offers a workable way of dealing with this question which affords Member States the latitude to adopt stricter rules if they consider this to be desirable.
As far as confidentiality is concerned, the solution proposed offers a workable way of dealing with this question which affords Member States the latitude to adopt stricter rules if they consider this to be desirable.
As far as the question of legal basis is concerned, it would appear that a majority of Member States in the Council take the view that the proposed directive should be limited to cross-border cases on the ground that, under Article 65 of the EC Treaty, measures "eliminating obstacles to the good functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States" have to have "cross-border implications" and to be taken in so far as they are "necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market".
As far as the question of legal basis is concerned, it would appear that a majority of Member States in the Council take the view that the proposed directive should be limited to cross-border cases on the ground that, under Article 65 of the EC Treaty, measures "eliminating obstacles to the good functioning of civil proceedings, if necessary by promoting the compatibility of the rules on civil procedure applicable in the Member States" have to have "cross-border implications" and to be taken in so far as they are "necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market".
The compromise which the rapporteur has put forward is designed to take into account Member States concerns' about the application of Article 65, while giving consumers and citizens in the internal market practical and user-friendly options to have access to a high standard of mediation across the EU.
The compromise which the rapporteur has put forward is designed to take into account Member States concerns' about the application of Article 65, while giving consumers and citizens in the internal market practical and user-friendly options to have access to a high standard of mediation across the EU.
It is hoped that the Council will take a commonsense view of the benefits of mediation and that the directive can also be applied to domestic cases in Member States.
It is hoped that the Council will take a commonsense view of the benefits of mediation and that the directive can also be applied to domestic cases in Member States.
Lastly, the rapporteur commends this initiative insofar as it will serve to publicise and promote mediation as an alternative means of access to justice and afford a framework of common rules which are sufficiently robust to protect the parties' interests, yet light enough to allow market-driven solutions to emerge.
Lastly, the rapporteur commends this initiative insofar as it will serve to publicise and promote mediation as an alternative means of access to justice and afford a framework of common rules which are sufficiently robust to protect the parties' interests, yet light enough to allow market-driven solutions to emerge.
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
The European Council has repeatedly stressed the importance of alternative methods of resolving disputes.
The European Council has repeatedly stressed the importance of alternative methods of resolving disputes.
In 2000 the Council approved alternative methods of settling disputes under civil and commercial law.
In 2000 the Council approved alternative methods of settling disputes under civil and commercial law.