natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The problem has a genuine European dimension since it seriously affects eight European Union countries, namely Germany, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark and Poland.
The problem has a genuine European dimension since it seriously affects eight European Union countries, namely Germany, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Denmark and Poland.
The rapporteur therefore calls on the Council and Commission to use all available legal means to prevent the construction of the Northern European gas pipeline on the scale proposed by the investors.
The rapporteur therefore calls on the Council and Commission to use all available legal means to prevent the construction of the Northern European gas pipeline on the scale proposed by the investors.
Your rapporteur firmly believes that routing the northern gas pipeline overland through EU territory will make it possible to meet the strategic and economic objectives set out in Decision 1364/2006/EC, while at the same time averting the serious threat to the environment and an increase in prices that would have to be borne by consumers.
Your rapporteur firmly believes that routing the northern gas pipeline overland through EU territory will make it possible to meet the strategic and economic objectives set out in Decision 1364/2006/EC, while at the same time averting the serious threat to the environment and an increase in prices that would have to be borne by consumers.
Your rapporteur is gravely concerned that in recent months, in virtually all the Baltic countries, expert agencies, government bodies responsible for the environment and representatives of environmental associations have examined the fundamentals of the project and concluded that it would pose serious threats to the environment, including:
Your rapporteur is gravely concerned that in recent months, in virtually all the Baltic countries, expert agencies, government bodies responsible for the environment and representatives of environmental associations have examined the fundamentals of the project and concluded that it would pose serious threats to the environment, including:
Damage to Natura 2000 areas;
Damage to Natura 2000 areas;
Danger of disturbing German chemical weapons dumps from World War II, mines, unexploded bombs and sunken vessels, particularly in the Gulf of Finland and in areas along the route of the planned pipeline;
Danger of disturbing German chemical weapons dumps from World War II, mines, unexploded bombs and sunken vessels, particularly in the Gulf of Finland and in areas along the route of the planned pipeline;
The unprecedented size of the construction zone (2400 km 2 - the same size as the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), in a sea such as the Baltic, which is relatively small and enclosed;
The unprecedented size of the construction zone (2400 km 2 - the same size as the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg), in a sea such as the Baltic, which is relatively small and enclosed;
The threat of large-scale pollution from the discharge into the Baltic Sea of thousands of tons of chemicals (aldehydes) needed to clean the pipeline before it enters into service.
The threat of large-scale pollution from the discharge into the Baltic Sea of thousands of tons of chemicals (aldehydes) needed to clean the pipeline before it enters into service.
The environmental risks set out in detail by various experts at the public hearing are confirmed by the opinions and the viewpoints of other organisations which have approached Members of Parliament, including Nordic Greenpeace, which forwarded a statement expressing its concern and opposition to the planned Nord Stream pipeline and expressing support for the overland option.
The environmental risks set out in detail by various experts at the public hearing are confirmed by the opinions and the viewpoints of other organisations which have approached Members of Parliament, including Nordic Greenpeace, which forwarded a statement expressing its concern and opposition to the planned Nord Stream pipeline and expressing support for the overland option.
Your rapporteur cannot accept the viewpoint that a project affecting the Baltic seabed is a bilateral matter for Germany and Russia.
Your rapporteur cannot accept the viewpoint that a project affecting the Baltic seabed is a bilateral matter for Germany and Russia.
Protection of the Baltic Sea environment is one of the most important tasks facing the so-called Northern dimension of the EU, and one which is addressed in a series of Community resolutions and legal instruments dealing with this issue.
Protection of the Baltic Sea environment is one of the most important tasks facing the so-called Northern dimension of the EU, and one which is addressed in a series of Community resolutions and legal instruments dealing with this issue.
In this connection, the European Union has a duty to devote special care to the Baltic Sea environment, not forgetting also the need for solidarity, energy security and consumer protection.
In this connection, the European Union has a duty to devote special care to the Baltic Sea environment, not forgetting also the need for solidarity, energy security and consumer protection.
There have been cases where European institutions have reacted firmly to inter-state projects with dubious effects on the environment where these ultimately affected only one state.
There have been cases where European institutions have reacted firmly to inter-state projects with dubious effects on the environment where these ultimately affected only one state.
It is hard to imagine that the EU institutions will treat lightly a case which in practice affects one third of its Member States and its only enclosed sea.
It is hard to imagine that the EU institutions will treat lightly a case which in practice affects one third of its Member States and its only enclosed sea.
It should be stressed in particular that the investors took no account of the need first of all to examine alternative routes for the gas pipeline which would not damage the marine environment, bearing in mind that the possibility exists for a land route running from the Russian border and passing solely through European Union countries.
It should be stressed in particular that the investors took no account of the need first of all to examine alternative routes for the gas pipeline which would not damage the marine environment, bearing in mind that the possibility exists for a land route running from the Russian border and passing solely through European Union countries.
In this connection, your rapporteur urges the Commission to undertake such an analysis, as part of a dialogue with the countries concerned, the investors and the Helsinki Commission and with the participation of interested NGOs.
In this connection, your rapporteur urges the Commission to undertake such an analysis, as part of a dialogue with the countries concerned, the investors and the Helsinki Commission and with the participation of interested NGOs.
Your rapporteur supports the decision of 12 February 2008 by the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden refusing to grant the company Nord Stream permission to build the pipeline because of significant substantive and procedural shortcomings and, in particular, the failure to submit any study of alternative routes or the option of abandoning the construction of the pipeline.
Your rapporteur supports the decision of 12 February 2008 by the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden refusing to grant the company Nord Stream permission to build the pipeline because of significant substantive and procedural shortcomings and, in particular, the failure to submit any study of alternative routes or the option of abandoning the construction of the pipeline.
Your rapporteur also supports the position adopted by the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania on 27 March 2007, pointing to the need to suspend large-scale infrastructure projects in the Baltic until detailed studies of alternative options have been undertaken together with independent and comprehensive environmental impact assessments.
Your rapporteur also supports the position adopted by the Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania on 27 March 2007, pointing to the need to suspend large-scale infrastructure projects in the Baltic until detailed studies of alternative options have been undertaken together with independent and comprehensive environmental impact assessments.
The rapporteur also takes note of the decision of 21 September 2007 by the Government of Estonia refusing Nord Stream permission to carry out underwater studies in its exclusive economic zone.
The rapporteur also takes note of the decision of 21 September 2007 by the Government of Estonia refusing Nord Stream permission to carry out underwater studies in its exclusive economic zone.
Your rapporteur also wishes to draw attention to the problem of covering the cost of damage caused during the construction and use of the pipeline and the cost of dismantling it at the end of its period of operation.
Your rapporteur also wishes to draw attention to the problem of covering the cost of damage caused during the construction and use of the pipeline and the cost of dismantling it at the end of its period of operation.
Apart from looking at environmental questions, we also need to consider the opinions of leading experts and European media, who speak of an increase in investment costs of up to 20 billion euro and anticipate considerable delays in the building schedule caused by the need for extensive studies and consultations at political and social level.
Apart from looking at environmental questions, we also need to consider the opinions of leading experts and European media, who speak of an increase in investment costs of up to 20 billion euro and anticipate considerable delays in the building schedule caused by the need for extensive studies and consultations at political and social level.
In their opinion, even if the project is completed within a number of years, after taking exceptional security measures and paying compensation for damage to Natura 2000 protected areas, the enormous cost is bound to affect European gas prices, particularly German consumers and the companies building the pipeline.
In their opinion, even if the project is completed within a number of years, after taking exceptional security measures and paying compensation for damage to Natura 2000 protected areas, the enormous cost is bound to affect European gas prices, particularly German consumers and the companies building the pipeline.
These experts believe that the costs involved would be several times greater than the cost of a land-based alternative.
These experts believe that the costs involved would be several times greater than the cost of a land-based alternative.
на вниманието на комисията по петиции
for the Committee on Petitions
относно eкологичното въздействие на запланувания газопровод в Балтийско море, който ще свързва Русия и Германия
on the environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
Комисията по външни работи приканва водещата комисия по петиции да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on Foreign Affairs calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; подчертава, че проектът е определен като проект от европейски интерес в последните насоки за трансевропейските енергийни мрежи (TENE-E), приети през септември 2006 г., и че той следва да се планира в духа на общата европейска външна политика в областта на енергетиката;
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0413 . ; underlines that the project has been labelled a project of European interest in the latest guidelines on Trans-European Energy Networks (TENE-E), adopted in September 2006, and that it should be planned in the spirit of the common European foreign policy on energy;
– да извършат оценка на разнообразните аспекти на проекта „Северен поток”, свързани с прозрачността, икономическите, бюджетни, регулаторни и правни въпроси;
– to assess the various transparency-related, economic, budget-related, regulatory and legal aspects of the Nord Stream project;
– да предприемат проучване на приноса на „Северен поток” за задоволяване на енергийните потребности на Европа, включително разглеждане на всички алтернативи;
– to undertake a study of Nord Stream’s contribution to Europe’s energy needs, including a consideration of all alternatives;
– да гарантират ангажирането на Nord Streamи свързаните с него дружества в открит и прозрачен диалог в тясно сътрудничество с всички засегнати страни по всички въпроси по време на всички етапи преди и след изграждането на газопровода „Северен поток”;
– to ensure that Nord Stream and its affiliated companies engage in an open and transparent dialogue and cooperate closely with all parties concerned on all aspects throughout all stages before and after construction of the Nord Stream pipeline;
– да гарантират, че при независимата оценка на въздействието върху околната среда надлежно са взети под внимание опасенията на всички крайбрежни държави;
– to ensure that the concerns of all littoral states are duly taken into account in the independent environmental impact assessment;
– да повторят призива си за ратифициране и поемане на ангажимент от страна на Русия за пълно прилагане на разпоредбите на Конвенцията от Еспоо и Договора за енергийната харта, включително на приложения към него Транзитен протокол;
– to reiterate its call for the ratification of, and commitment to full implementation of the provisions of, the Espoo Convention and the Energy Charter Treaty, including the Transit Protocol thereto, by Russia;
12. предлага установяването на общ надзор за тръбопровода, включващ всички държави от региона на Балтийско море; освен това, счита за съществено Комисията да обърне специално внимание на проучването на аспектите на планираното изграждане на тръбопровода, свързани с околната среда, като използва всички налични правни инструменти, с които разполага и по искане на държава-членка чрез пряко участие на и тясно сътрудничество с Хелзинкската комисия;
Suggests the establishment of a common supervision of the pipeline including all the countries in the Baltic Sea region; furthermore, considers it essential for the Commission to pay close attention to the screening of an environmental aspect of the planned pipeline construction, by using all existing legal instruments available to the Commission, and, upon request by a Member State, through the direct involvement of, and in close cooperation with, HELCOM (the Helsinki Commission);
Christopher Beazley, Angelika Beer, Colm Burke, Marco Cappato, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Willy Meyer Pleite, Francisco José Millán Mon, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, Libor Rouček, Katrin Saks, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Кристиан Вигенин, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Christopher Beazley, Angelika Beer, Colm Burke, Marco Cappato, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Ana Maria Gomes, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Willy Meyer Pleite, Francisco José Millán Mon, Raimon Obiols i Germà, Vural Öger, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Tobias Pflüger, João de Deus Pinheiro, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Michel Rocard, Libor Rouček, Katrin Saks, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Konrad Szymański, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Alexandra Dobolyi, Carlo Fatuzzo, Евгени Кирилов, Marios Matsakis, Rihards Pīks, Dariusz Rosati, Wojciech Roszkowski, Inger Segelström, Adrian Severin, Jean Spautz
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Alexandra Dobolyi, Carlo Fatuzzo, Evgeni Kirilov, Marios Matsakis, Rihards Pīks, Dariusz Rosati, Wojciech Roszkowski, Inger Segelström, Adrian Severin, Jean Spautz
относно въздействието върху околната среда на планираното изграждане на газопровод в Балтийско море, свързващ Русия и Германия
on the Environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany
Комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика приканва водещата комисия по петиции да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
17. призовава Комисията, като страна по HELCOM, да се стреми да изпълнява препоръките на HELCOM за въвеждане на стандартни изисквания по отношение на обхвата на проучванията, необходими за процедурите по одобрение на подводни кабели и тръбопроводи в Балтийско море;
Calls on the Commission as signatory to HELCOM to seek to put into effect the HELCOM recommendation for the establishment of standard requirements regarding the scope of investigations necessary for the approval procedures for submarine cables and pipelines in the Baltic Sea;
Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Den Dover, Nicole Fontaine, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Catherine Trautmann, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Den Dover, Nicole Fontaine, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Werner Langen, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Catherine Trautmann, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Dorette Corbey, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Vittorio Prodi, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Dorette Corbey, Göran Färm, Juan Fraile Cantón, Vittorio Prodi, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Sir Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Victor Boştinaru, Michael Cashman, Alexandra Dobolyi, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, David Hammerstein, Marian Harkin, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Lasse Lehtinen, Marcin Libicki, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Manolis Mavrommatis, Mairead McGuinness, Willy Meyer Pleite, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Eoin Ryan, Frank Vanhecke, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland
Sir Robert Atkins, Margrete Auken, Inés Ayala Sender, Victor Boştinaru, Michael Cashman, Alexandra Dobolyi, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, David Hammerstein, Marian Harkin, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Lasse Lehtinen, Marcin Libicki, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Manolis Mavrommatis, Mairead McGuinness, Willy Meyer Pleite, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Eoin Ryan, Frank Vanhecke, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland
Thijs Berman, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Georgios Georgiou, Henrik Lax, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre
Thijs Berman, Marie-Hélène Descamps, Georgios Georgiou, Henrik Lax, Grażyna Staniszewska, Margie Sudre
Urszula Gacek, Tunne Kelam, Vytautas Landsbergis, Markus Pieper, Konrad Szymański
Urszula Gacek, Tunne Kelam, Vytautas Landsbergis, Markus Pieper, Konrad Szymański
PE 400.717v02-00
PE 400.717v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................50
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................46
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по бюджети .............................................................54
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................52
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по икономически и парични въпроси ....59
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............57
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите 91
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 86
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2007)0530 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0530 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 95 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0318/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0318/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика и становищата на комисията по бюджети, комисията по икономически и парични въпроси, както и на комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите ( A6‑0226/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6‑0226/2008 ),
Параграфи 1 a и 1 б (нови)
Paragraphs 1 a and 1 b (new)
В случай, че се създаде Агенция за сътрудничество между енергийните регулатори, следва да се разгледат всички възможности за финансиране, предвидени в Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление 1 .
In the event that an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators is established, all financing options provided for in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management 1 should be considered .
1 O В C 139, 14.6.2006 г. , стр .
1 OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.
(3) Работата, извършена от ERGEG след нейното създаване, има положителен принос за вътрешния пазар на електроенергия и газ.
(3) The work undertaken by ERGEG since its establishment has made a positive contribution to the internal market in electricity and gas.
При все това в сектора е общопризнато и е предложено от самата ERGEG да се премине от доброволно сътрудничество между националните регулаторни органи към сътрудничество в рамките на структура на Общността с ясни компетенции и правомощия да приема самостоятелни регулаторни решения в някои специфични случаи.
However, it is widely recognised by the sector, and has been proposed by ERGEG itself, that voluntary cooperation between national regulatory authorities should now take place within a Community structure with clear competences and with the power to adopt individual regulatory decisions in a number of specific cases.
( Не се отнася до българския текст .)
(Does not affect English version.)
(4а) За да бъдат постигнати целите на енергийната политика на Общността, държавите-членки следва да си оказват тясно сътрудничество, като премахват пречките пред трансграничния обмен на електроенергия и газ.
(4a) Тhe Member States should cooperate closely, eliminating obstacles to cross-border exchanges of electricity and gas with a view to achieving the objectives of Community energy policy.