natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
A certain amount of time is required, in particular, for the contact points to be set up, for information to be provided to all state administration employees who, in practice, will implement the regulation, and, if necessary, for vital legislative measures to be adopted relating to the new elements introduced by the regulation.
A certain amount of time is required, in particular, for the contact points to be set up, for information to be provided to all state administration employees who, in practice, will implement the regulation, and, if necessary, for vital legislative measures to be adopted relating to the new elements introduced by the regulation.
For these reasons, it would appear appropriate to increase the deadline to three months.
For these reasons, it would appear appropriate to increase the deadline to three months.
Прилагането на някои национални технически правила за продукти, законно продавани на пазара в други държави-членки
Application of certain national technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Silvia Ciornei, Den Dover, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Romano Maria La Russa, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Radu Ţîrle, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Dominique Vlasto
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Silvia Ciornei, Den Dover, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Romano Maria La Russa, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Miloslav Ransdorf, Herbert Reul, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Radu Ţîrle, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Dominique Vlasto
Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Hans-Peter Mayer, Sepp Kusstatscher, Thomas Mann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos
Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Hans-Peter Mayer, Sepp Kusstatscher, Thomas Mann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos
относно предложението за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно установяване на процедурите, свързани с прилагането на някои национални технически правила за продукти, законно продавани на пазара в други държави-членки, и за отмяна на Решение 3052/95/EО
on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation laying down procedures relating to the application of certain national technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member State and repealing Decision 3052/95/EC
Under Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty Member States of destination cannot forbid the sale on their territories of products which are lawfully marketed in another Member State and which are not subject to Community harmonisation, unless the technical restrictions laid down by the Member State of destination are justified on the grounds described in Article 30 of the EC Treaty, or on the basis of overriding requirements of general public importance recognised by the Court of Justice's case law, and are proportionate.
Under Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty Member States of destination cannot forbid the sale on their territories of products which are lawfully marketed in another Member State and which are not subject to Community harmonisation, unless the technical restrictions laid down by the Member State of destination are justified on the grounds described in Article 30 of the EC Treaty, or on the basis of overriding requirements of general public importance recognised by the Court of Justice's case law, and are proportionate.
This is the so-called 'principle of mutual recognition'.
This is the so-called 'principle of mutual recognition'.
The implementation of this principle is hampered by several problems: (i) the lack of awareness of enterprises and national authorities about the existence of the mutual recognition principle; (ii) the legal uncertainty about the scope of the principle and the burden of proof, because it is often unclear to which categories of product mutual recognition applies; (iii) the risk for enterprises that their products will not get access to the market of the Member State of destination; (iv) the absence of regular dialogues between competent authorities in different Member States.
The implementation of this principle is hampered by several problems: (i) the lack of awareness of enterprises and national authorities about the existence of the mutual recognition principle; (ii) the legal uncertainty about the scope of the principle and the burden of proof, because it is often unclear to which categories of product mutual recognition applies; (iii) the risk for enterprises that their products will not get access to the market of the Member State of destination; (iv) the absence of regular dialogues between competent authorities in different Member States.
It is therefore necessary to lay down procedures to ensure that national technical rules do not create illegal barriers to the free movement of goods between Member States.
It is therefore necessary to lay down procedures to ensure that national technical rules do not create illegal barriers to the free movement of goods between Member States.
The draftsman has made changes to the proposal for a regulation in order to make its scope clearer, to improve access to information for economic operators and to make the Commission's task of monitoring easier.
The draftsman has made changes to the proposal for a regulation in order to make its scope clearer, to improve access to information for economic operators and to make the Commission's task of monitoring easier.
The amendments also seek to increase the responsibility of the Community's executive arm: as the guardian of the Treaties, it has a duty to exercise its monitoring role more actively.
The amendments also seek to increase the responsibility of the Community's executive arm: as the guardian of the Treaties, it has a duty to exercise its monitoring role more actively.
Комисията по правни въпроси приканва водещата комисия по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите да включи в доклада си следните изменения:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
като взеха предвид Договора за създаване на Европейскaтa общност, и по-специално член 37 и член 95 от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 37 and 95 thereof,
като взеха предвид Договора за създаване на Европейскaтa общност, и по-специално член 95 от него,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95 thereof,
This sentence has been replaced by Recitals 1a and 1b, which spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
This sentence has been replaced by Recitals 1a and 1b, which spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
(1а) Всички мерки за търговско регулиране на държавите-членки, които могат да възпрепятстват, пряко или косвено, действително или потенциално, търговията в рамките на Общността, следва да бъдат считани за мерки с ефект, равнозначен на количествени ограничения върху вноса, и на това основание са забранени от член 28 на Договора.
(1a) Any trade rules in the Member States which are capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, have to be deemed to be a measure having equivalent effect to quantitative restrictions on imports and, accordingly, are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
Така, норми, които се прилагат без разграничение към местните и вносни продукти, и чието прилагане може да намали техния обем на продажби, също така представляват по принцип мерки с равнозначен ефект, забранени от член 28 от Договора.
Thus, standards which are applicable without distinction to national and imported products and the application of which is likely to reduce their volume of sales also constitute, in principle, measures having equivalent effect which are prohibited by Article 28 of the Treaty.
The procedure laid down in the proposal for a regulation represents an exception to the principle of mutual recognition.
The procedure laid down in the proposal for a regulation represents an exception to the principle of mutual recognition.
The purpose of Recitals 1a and 1b is to spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
The purpose of Recitals 1a and 1b is to spell out the ban on any national measure which is capable of hindering intra-Community trade directly or indirectly, actually or potentially.
They constitute a warning directed at the Member States, based on the case law of the Court of Justice
They constitute a warning directed at the Member States, based on the case law of the Court of Justice
Съображение 1 б (ново)
Recital 1 b (new)
(1б) Според Съда на европейските общности, система, която би поддържала, макар и формално, изискването за лицензи за внос или какъвто и да е друг подобен способ, е по принцип в противоречие с член 30 от Договора.
(1b) According to the Court of Justice a system which maintains the requirement, even a purely formal one, for import licences or any other similar procedure is, in principle, contrary to Article 30 of the Treaty.
Действително, налагането на формалности по отношение на вноса, които въвеждат разрешителен режим с превантивен характер, може да възпрепятства търговията в Общността и достъпа до пазара на стоки, произведени и законно продавани на пазара в други държави-членки.
The fact of imposing import formalities which create a system of preventive authorisation is actually capable of hindering intra-Community trade and of hindering market access for products which are lawfully manufactured and marketed in other Member States.
Пречката се оказва още по-сериозна в случаите, в които този режим води до допълнително оскъпяване на продуктите, попадащи под него.
The obstacle is even more serious if the system exposes the products concerned to additional costs.
При такива обстоятелства не става въпрос за обикновено ограничение или обикновена забрана на някои условия и ред за продажба.
In such circumstances this is not a simple restriction or simple prohibition of certain sales arrangements.
Налагането на разрешение с превантивен характер следва да се счита в тези случаи за пречка за търговията между държавите-членки, попадаща в приложното поле на член 28 от Договора.
The fact of imposing preventive authorisation must therefore be considered to constitute a barrier to trade between the Member States which falls within the scope of Article 28 of the Treaty.
(2) Пред свободното движение на стоки между държавите-членки могат незаконно да бъдат създадени препятствия от националните власти, при отсъствието на хармонизирано законодателство, в резултат на прилагането за стоки, идващи от други държави-членки, където те се продават законно на пазара, на технически правила , поставящи изисквания, които трябва да бъдат спазени от тези стоки, като такива, касаещи предназначението, формата, размера, теглото, състава, външния вид, етикета и опаковката.
(2) Obstacles to the free movement of goods between Member States may be unlawfully created by the national authorities, in the absence of harmonisation of legislation, as a consequence of applying, to goods coming from other Member States where they are lawfully marketed, technical rules laying down requirements to be met by such goods, such as those relating to designation, form, size, weight, composition, presentation, labelling and packaging.
Прилагането на такива технически правила за продукти, продавани законно на пазара в друга държава-членка , може да е в противоречие с член 28 и член 30 от Договора, дори ако тези национални правила се прилагат за всички продукти без разграничение.
The application of such technical rules to products lawfully marketed in another Member States can be contrary to Articles 28 and 30 of the EC Treaty, even if those national rules apply without distinction to all products.
The final sentence of this recital is covered by the new Recitals 1a and 1b.
The final sentence of this recital is covered by the new Recitals 1a and 1b.
Съображение 7а (ново)
Recital 7a (new)
(7а) Директива 98/34/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 22 юни 1998 г., която предвижда процедура за предоставяне на информация в областта на техническите стандарти и регламенти и на правилата относно услугите в информационното общество 1 , задължава държавите-членки да уведомяват Комисията и останалите държави-членки за всеки проект за технически регламент, засягащ промишлени, земеделски и рибни продукти, както и да изпращат до горепосочените уведомление относно причините, налагащи установяването на съответния регламент.
(7a) Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services 1 obliges Member States to communicate to the Commission and the other Member States any draft technical rules concerning industrially manufactured products and agricultural (including fish) products and a statement of the grounds which make the enactment of such technical rules necessary.
Въпреки това е необходимо да се гарантира, че след приемането на дадено техническо правило на национално равнище, принципът на взаимно признаване се прилага правилно в особени случаи на специфични продукти.
It is necessary, however, to ensure that, following the adoption of a national technical rule, the principle of mutual recognition is correctly applied in individual cases to specific products.
Настоящият регламент определя процедура за прилагането на принципа на взаимно признаване в особени случаи, като предвижда националните органи да бъдат задължени да се обосноват въз основа на какви технически или научни аргументи специфичният продукт в настоящия му вид не може да бъде разрешен на националния пазар в съответствие с членове 28 и 30 от Договора.
This Regulation lays down a procedure for the application of the principle of mutual recognition in individual cases, through the obligation for the national authorities to specify the technical or scientific grounds on which the specific product in its current form cannot be authorised on the national market, in accordance with Articles 28 and 30 of the Treaty.
Според настоящия регламент, националните органи не се задължават да обосноват самото техническо правило.
National authorities are not required under this Regulation to state the grounds for the technical rule itself.
La directive 98/34 et le règlement doivent être deux systèmes complémentaires, le règlement ne doit pas remettre en cause les procédures de notifications existantes.
La directive 98/34 et le règlement doivent être deux systèmes complémentaires, le règlement ne doit pas remettre en cause les procédures de notifications existantes.
En outre, en communiquant à la Commission toute règle technique à l'état de projet relative à un produit industriel, un produit agricole ou de la pêche et en lui notifiant les éléments qui le poussent à prendre cette mesure technique, l'Etat membre par la directive 98/34 s'assure ainsi que les contraintes pesant sur les autorités nationales ensuite seront les plus légères possible : il ne devra pas rejustifier la règle technique en elle-même.
En outre, en communiquant à la Commission toute règle technique à l'état de projet relative à un produit industriel, un produit agricole ou de la pêche et en lui notifiant les éléments qui le poussent à prendre cette mesure technique, l'Etat membre par la directive 98/34 s'assure ainsi que les contraintes pesant sur les autorités nationales ensuite seront les plus légères possible : il ne devra pas rejustifier la règle technique en elle-même.
Le présent règlement renforce le système ex ante en obligeant les Etats membres à notifier tout projet de règle technique aux opérateurs économiques concernés par l'intermédiaire des points de contact "produit".
Le présent règlement renforce le système ex ante en obligeant les Etats membres à notifier tout projet de règle technique aux opérateurs économiques concernés par l'intermédiaire des points de contact "produit".
Il assure donc une information à l'interlocuteur direct avant que l'entrave ne soit créée et encourage le dialogue entre les entreprises et les Etats membres.
Il assure donc une information à l'interlocuteur direct avant que l'entrave ne soit créée et encourage le dialogue entre les entreprises et les Etats membres.
(8а) Уместно е да се прави разграничение между задължението за предоставяне на потребителя на данни относно продукта, чрез поставяне върху продукта на някои спецификации или чрез прилагане на документи, като инструкции за ползване, от задължението за предоставяне на тези данни на определен език.
(8a) A distinction must be drawn between the obligation to provide the consumer with specific information concerning the product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending to it documents such as instructions for use, and the obligation to provide such information in a given language.
Ето защо задължението за предоставяне на някои данни относно продукта, чрез поставяне върху продукта на някои спецификации или чрез прилагане на документи, представлява "техническо правило" за целите на настоящия регламент, докато задължението за осигуряване на задължителните означения на етикета и на инструкциите за ползване поне на езика или езиците на територията, на която въпросните продукти следва да бъдат продавани, не представлява "техническо правило" по смисъла на настоящия регламент.
This is why the obligation to provide specific information concerning a product by affixing certain specifications to the product or by appending documents to it constitutes a 'technical rule' for the purposes of this Regulation, whereas the obligation to provide mandatory labelling information and instructions for use at least in the language(s) of the area in which those products are to be marketed does not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
The reason for this recital is the concern not only to ensure proper information for operators and consumers but also to clarify the scope of this regulation in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice.
The reason for this recital is the concern not only to ensure proper information for operators and consumers but also to clarify the scope of this regulation in accordance with the case law of the Court of Justice.
In its COLIM NV judgment (C-33/97) the Court of Justice spelled out what was and was not covered by the idea of a 'technical rule', and this must therefore be clarified in a recital so as to ensure the satisfactory application of this regulation.
In its COLIM NV judgment (C-33/97) the Court of Justice spelled out what was and was not covered by the idea of a 'technical rule', and this must therefore be clarified in a recital so as to ensure the satisfactory application of this regulation.
(8б) Процедурите за предварително разрешение не представляват техническо правило по смисъла на настоящия регламент.
(8b) Procedures entailing prior authorisation do not constitute a technical rule within the meaning of this Regulation.
There are national procedures for authorising the marketing of products (medical products).
There are national procedures for authorising the marketing of products (medical products).
Under Community law, where any prior authorisation procedure is concerned there is no obligation to have a standstill period, and this regulation therefore does not apply.
Under Community law, where any prior authorisation procedure is concerned there is no obligation to have a standstill period, and this regulation therefore does not apply.
(9) Директива 2001/95/EО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 3 декември 2001 г. за общата безопасност на продуктите уточнява , че на пазара могат да се пускат само безопасни продукти.
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be placed on the market .
Следователно е необходимо от обхвата на настоящия регламент да се изключат мерките, предприемани от националните власти по националното законодателство, изпълняващо Директива 2001/95/EО.
It is necessary, therefore, to exclude from the scope of this Regulation measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Directive 2001/95/EC.
(9) Директива 2001/95/EО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 3 декември 2001 г. за общата безопасност на продуктите уточнява, че само безопасни продукти могат да бъдат продавани и определя задълженията на производителите и на дистрибуторите относно безопасността на продуктите.
(9) Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety specifies that only safe products may be marketed, and lays down the obligations of producers and distributors with regard to product safety .
Тази директива дава също така право на органите да предприемат необходимите действия за своевременно прилагане на подходящите мерки, като предвидените в член 8, параграф 1, букви б) до е) на въпросната директива, в случаите, в които продукти създават сериозен риск.
Under that Directive the authorities are also entitled to take the requisite steps so as to apply appropriate measures, such as those referred to in Article 8(1)(b)-(f) of the Directive, with the requisite speed in cases where products pose a serious risk.
Следователно е уместно от приложното поле на настоящия регламент да се изключат мерките, предприемани от националните органи по националното законодателство, изпълняващо член 8, параграф 1, букви г) до е) от Директива 2001/95/EО.
Measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to national laws implementing Article 8(1)(d)-(f) and Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/95/EC should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation .
This amendment clarifies the content of Directive 2001/95/EC on product safety.
This amendment clarifies the content of Directive 2001/95/EC on product safety.
Тя задължава държавите-членки да информират незабавно Комисията, по система за бързо известяване, за всички мерки, които те предприемат с цел ограничаване на пускането на пазара, принудителното оттегляне от пазара, или изземване на храни, с цел защита на човешкото здраве и изискващи бързи действия Следователно, от обхвата на настоящия регламент трябва да се изключат мерките, предприемани от националните власти по член.
It obliges the Member States to immediately notify the Commission under the rapid alert system of any measure they adopt which is aimed at restricting the placing on the market or forcing the withdrawal from the market or the recall of food or feed in order to protect human health and requiring rapid action.
50 параграф 3, буква а) от Регламент (EО) № 178/2002.
Measures taken by the national authorities pursuant to Article 50(3)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 should therefore be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.