natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Secondly, the budget for IT applications development had been virtually exhausted for the year.
Secondly, the budget for IT applications development had been virtually exhausted for the year.
The substitute for Documentum was validated by the end of 2006, so the analysis and the planning of the migration of e-petition (and the other 2 applications concerned) could only start at the beginning of 2007.
The substitute for Documentum was validated by the end of 2006, so the analysis and the planning of the migration of e-petition (and the other 2 applications concerned) could only start at the beginning of 2007.
The impact of the DIT decision for Committee on Petitions was that the additional functions which we previously asked for would be developed as part of the migration process and would be launched at the end of 2007, much later than planned.
The impact of the DIT decision for Committee on Petitions was that the additional functions which we previously asked for would be developed as part of the migration process and would be launched at the end of 2007, much later than planned.
Fact-finding visits
Fact-finding visits
Availing itself of the possibility granted under Rule 192, the Committee on Petitions conducted in 2006 several fact-finding missions aiming to investigate some problematic petitions 'in situ'.
Availing itself of the possibility granted under Rule 192, the Committee on Petitions conducted in 2006 several fact-finding missions aiming to investigate some problematic petitions 'in situ'.
The visits were organised once the issues had been properly debated in Committee and their objectives clearly defined.
The visits were organised once the issues had been properly debated in Committee and their objectives clearly defined.
Such visits substantially enhance the committee's ability to understand the different aspects of the petitions and to seek solutions to complex problems in cooperation with all interested parties.
Such visits substantially enhance the committee's ability to understand the different aspects of the petitions and to seek solutions to complex problems in cooperation with all interested parties.
At the same time, they occasion a direct contact with European citizens and national authorities contributing to the general effort to raise awareness about the activity of the Committee.
At the same time, they occasion a direct contact with European citizens and national authorities contributing to the general effort to raise awareness about the activity of the Committee.
Four such fact-finding missions were organised: in Malta (9-11 May 2006), Spain (25-26 June 2006), Poland (11-14 July 2006) and United Kingdom (5-6 December 2006).
Four such fact-finding missions were organised: in Malta (9-11 May 2006), Spain (25-26 June 2006), Poland (11-14 July 2006) and United Kingdom (5-6 December 2006).
The object of the visit to Malta, which was undertaken by the Chairman of the Committee, was in part to introduce the work of the Committee to the Maltese authorities and to meet some of the citizens from the islands who have petitioned the Committee so far.
The object of the visit to Malta, which was undertaken by the Chairman of the Committee, was in part to introduce the work of the Committee to the Maltese authorities and to meet some of the citizens from the islands who have petitioned the Committee so far.
The Chairman also held useful discussions on the activity of the Committee with the Maltese Ombudsman and members of the House of Representatives.
The Chairman also held useful discussions on the activity of the Committee with the Maltese Ombudsman and members of the House of Representatives.
The key part of the visit allowed an in-depth investigation into the allegations which have been made concerning the way in which the Directive on Birds is applied in relation to migratory bird species.
The key part of the visit allowed an in-depth investigation into the allegations which have been made concerning the way in which the Directive on Birds is applied in relation to migratory bird species.
The visit followed petitions submitted by several associations and persons claiming insufficient controls of hunting of protected birds and possible infringement of EU legislation as set out in the Birds and Habitats Directives.
The visit followed petitions submitted by several associations and persons claiming insufficient controls of hunting of protected birds and possible infringement of EU legislation as set out in the Birds and Habitats Directives.
In Spain, the Committee's delegation focussed on investigating the allegations made by a number of petitioners concerning the ongoing construction of the M30 motorway project in and around Madrid.
In Spain, the Committee's delegation focussed on investigating the allegations made by a number of petitioners concerning the ongoing construction of the M30 motorway project in and around Madrid.
Parliament did not question the right of the competent authorities in Madrid to develop a proper transport infrastructure which they considered to be necessary.
Parliament did not question the right of the competent authorities in Madrid to develop a proper transport infrastructure which they considered to be necessary.
However, the petitioners had indicated that European legislation regarding the environmental impact of the project, and on noise and atmospheric pollution, and possible public procurement, may not be fully respected.
However, the petitioners had indicated that European legislation regarding the environmental impact of the project, and on noise and atmospheric pollution, and possible public procurement, may not be fully respected.
The European Commission, in a separate decision, opened infringement proceedings on April 4th.
The European Commission, in a separate decision, opened infringement proceedings on April 4th.
The members of the fact-finding visit met with public authorities, local residents affected by the project and other interested parties during the course of their visit.
The members of the fact-finding visit met with public authorities, local residents affected by the project and other interested parties during the course of their visit.
The visit to Poland (Warsaw and Poznan) was intended to give Members an overview of the measures taken by the Polish government concerning European integration as well as the current state of affairs.
The visit to Poland (Warsaw and Poznan) was intended to give Members an overview of the measures taken by the Polish government concerning European integration as well as the current state of affairs.
Members of the delegation had the possibility to meet the new Chairmen of the Senate's and the Sejm's Committees on European Affairs, as well as the president (Marshal) of the Polish Parliament (Sejm).
Members of the delegation had the possibility to meet the new Chairmen of the Senate's and the Sejm's Committees on European Affairs, as well as the president (Marshal) of the Polish Parliament (Sejm).
In Poznan Members took part in the Seminar on "European System of Human Rights Protection" in the Adam Mickiewicz University with the participation of the Rector, Prof. dr. hab.
In Poznan Members took part in the Seminar on "European System of Human Rights Protection" in the Adam Mickiewicz University with the participation of the Rector, Prof. dr. hab.
Stanislaw Lorenc, the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, Prof. dr. hab.
Stanislaw Lorenc, the European Ombudsman, Nikiforos Diamandouros, Prof. dr. hab.
Pawel Bortkiewicz and Marcin Libicki , chairman.
Pawel Bortkiewicz and Marcin Libicki , chairman.
A meeting with petitioners, who had submitted petitions on respectively the transport corridor "Via Baltica", the Eastern Warsaw Ring Road, the cableway "Kuznice-Kasprowy Wierch" in the Nature 2000 site "Tatry" and the environmental impact of the Baltic Sea gas pipeline took place during the stay in Warsaw.
A meeting with petitioners, who had submitted petitions on respectively the transport corridor "Via Baltica", the Eastern Warsaw Ring Road, the cableway "Kuznice-Kasprowy Wierch" in the Nature 2000 site "Tatry" and the environmental impact of the Baltic Sea gas pipeline took place during the stay in Warsaw.
The agenda of the visit to the United Kingdom had as main points a meeting in the European Parliament Office in London in order to explain the reasons which led the Committee on Petitions to close the Lloyd's petitions, consultations in the Petitions Unit of the Prime Minister's Office and discussion of the Multiple Sclerosis matters with petitioners.
The agenda of the visit to the United Kingdom had as main points a meeting in the European Parliament Office in London in order to explain the reasons which led the Committee on Petitions to close the Lloyd's petitions, consultations in the Petitions Unit of the Prime Minister's Office and discussion of the Multiple Sclerosis matters with petitioners.
Given a number of new petitions related to Multiple Sclerosis and the importance to follow-up to the Committee's December 2003 Report, the Committee had re-discussed the issue in-depth during its November meeting with the participation of Parliament's former Rapporteur, Uma Aaltonen, of representatives of the European Multiple Sclerosis Platform as well as those of the Multiple Sclerosis societies from most EU countries.
Given a number of new petitions related to Multiple Sclerosis and the importance to follow-up to the Committee's December 2003 Report, the Committee had re-discussed the issue in-depth during its November meeting with the participation of Parliament's former Rapporteur, Uma Aaltonen, of representatives of the European Multiple Sclerosis Platform as well as those of the Multiple Sclerosis societies from most EU countries.
The Commission and the Finnish Presidency made statements on the progress toward a Code of Good Practice which Parliament called for in its resolution.
The Commission and the Finnish Presidency made statements on the progress toward a Code of Good Practice which Parliament called for in its resolution.
The current report offers an overview of the main elements characterizing the activity of the Committee on Petitions in 2006, pointing out its achievements and areas where further progress is needed.
The current report offers an overview of the main elements characterizing the activity of the Committee on Petitions in 2006, pointing out its achievements and areas where further progress is needed.
The work of the Committee focussed on providing petitioners with the most appropriate redress.
The work of the Committee focussed on providing petitioners with the most appropriate redress.
In pursuing this objective the Committee has worked towards ensuring that petitions are managed in a transparent and effective way and that citizens do obtain comprehensive answers to the issues they raise.
In pursuing this objective the Committee has worked towards ensuring that petitions are managed in a transparent and effective way and that citizens do obtain comprehensive answers to the issues they raise.
In doing so, relations with other European institutions and bodies and, in particular, the European Commission remains very important.
In doing so, relations with other European institutions and bodies and, in particular, the European Commission remains very important.
Details of specific cases, Reports, Opinions and documents of the meetings of the Committee on Petitions are available on its website page.
Details of specific cases, Reports, Opinions and documents of the meetings of the Committee on Petitions are available on its website page .
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ I: Петиции, получени от Парламента
ANNEX I: Petitions received by Parliament
Общ брой
Total number
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ II - Статистически данни за получените през 2006 г. петиции въз основа на езика, използван в петициите
ANNEX II - Statistics of the petitions received in 2006 based on the language of the petitions
Немски 274
German 274
Английски 177
English 177
Испански 127
Spanish 127
Френски 69
French 69
Гръцки 68
Greek 68
Италиански 68
Italian 68
Полски 56
Polish 56
Нидерландски 20
Dutch 20
Португалски 18
Portuguese 18
Шведски 11
Swedish 11
Унгарски 7
Hungarian 7
Фински 5
Finnish 5
Словашки 4
Slovak 4
Чешки 4
Czech 4
Датски 3
Danish 3
Словенски 2
Slovenian 2
Латвийски 1
Latvian 1
Естонски 1
Estonian 1
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ III: Кореспонденция на комисията
ANNEX III: Correspondence received by the Committee
Получени писма
Received letters
Изпратени писма
Sent letters
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ IV: Петиции, обсъждaни в комисията през 2006 г. (точки A)
ANNEX IV: Petitions discussed in the Committee in 2006 (A points)
Margrete Auken, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Carnero González, Michael Cashman, Proinsias De Rossa, Alexandra Dobolyi, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, David Hammerstein, Marian Harkin, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Lasse Lehtinen, Marcin Libicki, Mairead McGuinness, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Maria Matsouka, Manolis Mavrommatis, Gay Mitchell, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Kathy Sinnott, Radu Ţîrle
Margrete Auken, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Carnero González, Michael Cashman, Proinsias De Rossa, Alexandra Dobolyi, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, David Hammerstein, Marian Harkin, Luis Herrero-Tejedor, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Lasse Lehtinen, Marcin Libicki, Mairead McGuinness, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Maria Matsouka, Manolis Mavrommatis, Gay Mitchell, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Kathy Sinnott, Radu Ţîrle
PE 396.430v02-00
PE 396.430v02-00
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ: РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И НА СЪВЕТА Error!
ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.........4
за предложението за решение на Европейския парламент и на Съвета
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council
относно отпускането на средства от фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз в съответствие с точка 26 от Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията за бюджетна дисциплина и добро финансово управление
on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund according to point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2007)0526 - C6-0286/2007 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and to the Council ( COM(2007)0526 - C6-0286/2007 ),
- като взе предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията за бюджетна дисциплина и добро финансово управление
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
ОВ C 139, 14.6.2006 г., стр. 1. , и по-конкретно член 26 от него,
OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по бюджети ( A6-0393/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0393/2007 ),
като взеха предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията за бюджетна дисциплина и добро финансово управление
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
като взеха предвид Регламент (ЕО) № 2012/2002 на Съвета от 11 ноември 2002 г. за създаване на фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
(1) Европейският съюз създаде фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз („Фонда“) в израз на солидарност с населението от регионите, засегнати от бедствия.
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the "Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. позволява отпускане на средства от Фонда в рамките на годишен таван от EUR 1 млрд.
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(3) Регламент (ЕО) № 2012/2002 на Съвета съдържа разпоредбите, съгласно които се отпускат средствата от Фонда.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
(4) Германия и Франция внесоха заявления за отпускане на средства от Фонда във връзка с две бедствия, причинени от, съответно, голям ураган и тропически циклон.
(4) Germany and France submitted applications to mobilise the Fund, concerning two disasters caused by a major storm and a tropical cyclone respectively,
В рамките на общия бюджет на Европейския съюз за финансовата 2007 година от фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз се отпуска сумата EUR 172 195 985 като бюджетни кредити за поети задължения и за плащания.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 172 195 985 in commitment and payment appropriations.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of Germany and France (La Réunion) on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of Germany and France (La Réunion) on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
The IIA allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
The IIA allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
The Commission has presented an amending budget (AB No 6) in order to enter in the 2007 budget specific commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
The Commission has presented an amending budget (AB No 6) in order to enter in the 2007 budget specific commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
Germany and France applied for assistance from the Fund, following natural disasters that caused serious damage, respectively in January and February of this year.
Germany and France applied for assistance from the Fund, following natural disasters that caused serious damage, respectively in January and February of this year.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 172 195 985, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 172 195 985, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
The Regional Affairs Committee, asked for an opinion, decided on 3 October to take no action on this proposal, in order not to slow down the allocation process.
The Regional Affairs Committee, asked for an opinion, decided on 3 October to take no action on this proposal, in order not to slow down the allocation process.
The amount of damage and the aid proposed by the Commission can be resumed as follows:
The amount of damage and the aid proposed by the Commission can be resumed as follows:
Aid Proposed
Aid Proposed
storm Kyrill
storm Kyrill
4 687 300 000
4 687 300 000
166 905 985
166 905 985
France/La réunion, cyclone Gamede
France/La réunion, cyclone Gamede
211 600 000
211 600 000
5 290 000
5 290 000
4 898 900 000
4 898 900 000
172 195 985
172 195 985
The Rapporteur recommends approval of the Commission proposal.
The Rapporteur recommends approval of the Commission proposal.
Thijs Berman, Richard Corbett
Thijs Berman, Richard Corbett
относно проекта на общ бюджет на Европейския съюз за финансовата 2008 г.
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008
Раздел IV – Съд
Section IV – Court of Justice
Раздел IX – Европейски надзорен орган по защита на данните
Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor
Част 1: Предложение за резолюция
Part 1: Motion for a resolution
PE 394.141v03-00
PE 394.141v03-00
Bookmark not defined.
Published separately
част 2 – A6‑0000/2007
Part 2 - A6-0000/2007
относно проекта на общ бюджет на Европейския съюз за финансовата 2008 г., Раздел I – Европейски парламент, Раздел II – Съвет, Раздел IV – Съд, Раздел V – Сметна палата, Раздел VI – Европейски икономически и социален комитет, Раздел VII – Комитет на регионите, Раздел VIII – Европейски омбудсман, Раздел IX – Европейски надзорен орган по защита на данните
on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008 - Section I - European Parliament, Section II - Council, Section IV - Court of Justice, Section V - Court of Auditors, Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII - Committee of the Regions, Section VIII - European Ombudsman, Section IX - European Data Protection Supervisor
- като взе предвид член 272 от Договора за ЕО,
- having regard to Article 272 of the EC Treaty,
- като взе предвид Решение 2000/597/ЕО, Евратом на Съвета от 29 септември 2000 г. относно системата на собствени ресурси на Европейските общности
- having regard to Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources
- като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО, Eвратом) № 1605/2002 на Съвета от 25 юни 2002 г. относно Финансовия регламент, приложим за общия бюджет на Европейските общности
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
- като взе предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията за бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
ОВ C 139, 14.6.2006 г., стр. 1. ,
OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.1. ,
- като взе предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 6 май 1999 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията за бюджетна дисциплина и подобряване на бюджетната процедура
- having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
- като взе предвид своята резолюция от 29 март 2007 г. относно насоките за бюджетната процедура за 2008 г. - Раздели ІІ, ІV, V, VІ, VІІ, VІІІ и ІХ и относно предварителната бюджетна прогноза на Европейския парламент (Раздел І) за бюджетната процедура за 2008
- having regard to its resolution of 29 March 2007 on the guidelines for the 2008 budget procedure - Sections II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII and IX and on the European Parliament's preliminary draft estimates (Section I) for the 2008 budget procedure
Текстове, приети от тази дата, P6_TA(2007)0099 . ,
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2007)0099 . ,
- като взе предвид своята резолюция от 7 юни 2007 г. относно бюджетната прогноза за приходите и разходите на Европейския парламент за финансовата 2008 г
- having regard to its resolution of 7 June 2007 on Parliament's estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2008
Текстове, приети от тази дата, P6_TA(2007)0237 . ,
Texts adopted of that date , P6_TA(2007)0237 . ,
- като взе предвид член 69 и Приложение ІV към своя правилник,
- having regard to Rule 69 of and Annex IV to its Rules of Procedure,
- като взе предвид доклада на комисията по бюджети и становищата на комисията по международна търговия и комисията по петиции ( A6-0394/2007 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0394/2007 ),
A. като има предвид, че 2008 г. е втората година от новата финансова рамка (2007-2013 г.), за която горната граница на функция 5 (Административни разходи) е определена на 7 457 млн. EUR при текущите цени,
A. whereas 2008 is the second year of the new financial framework (2007-2013), for which the ceiling of heading 5 (Administrative expenditure) has been set at EUR 7 457 million at current prices,