natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Държавите-членки определят подходящи специфични качествени или количествени контролни показатели за мерките за предотвратяване образуването на отпадъци, приети за наблюдение и оценка на напредъка в изпълнението на мерките, и могат да определят специфични качествени или количествени цели и индикатори, различни от посочените в параграф 4, за същата цел.
Member States shall determine appropriate specific qualitative or quantitative benchmarks for waste prevention measures adopted in order to monitor and assess the progress of the measures and may determine specific qualitative or quantitative targets and indicators, other than those referred to in paragraph 4, for the same purpose.
Държавите-членки определят подходящи специфични качествени и количествени цели в рамките на такива програми въз основа най-малко на началната цел за стабилизиране на образуването на отпадъци до 2012 г. и допълнителното значително намаляване на образуването на отпадъци до 2020 г., както е посочено в член 7a.
Member States shall determine appropriate specific qualitative and quantitative targets within such programmes based on at least the starting point target of stabilising waste generation by 2012 and further significantly reducing waste generation by 2020 , as set out in Article 7a.
Индикатори за мерките за предотвратяване образуването на отпадъци могат да бъдат приети в съответствие с процедурата, посочена в член 36, параграф 3.
Indicators for waste prevention measures may be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 36(3).
The Parliament gives a high priority to the adoption of targets for the prevention and recycling of wastes.
The Parliament gives a high priority to the adoption of targets for the prevention and recycling of wastes.
Член 26 – параграф 5
Article 26 – paragraph 5
Комисията разработва насоки за подкрепа на държавите-членки при изготвянето на програмите.
The Commission shall develop guidelines in order to assist the Member States in the preparation of the Programmes.
Комисията създава система за обмен на информация относно най-добрите практики по отношение на предотвратяването на образуването на отпадъци и разработва насоки за подкрепа на държавите-членки при изготвянето на програмите.
The Commission shall create a system for sharing information on best practice regarding waste prevention and develop guidelines in order to assist the Member States in the preparation of the Programmes.
Amendment moved at first reading (amendment 69).
Amendment moved at first reading (amendment 69).
Such as system would allow authorities to take inspiration from effective measures taken in another member state.
Such as system would allow authorities to take inspiration from effective measures taken in another member state.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че плановете за управление на отпадъците и програмите за предотвратяване образуването на отпадъци се оценяват най-малко на всеки шест години и се ревизират, когато това е необходимо .
Member States shall ensure that the waste management plans and waste prevention programmes are evaluated at least every sixth year and revised as appropriate .
Държавите-членки редовно оценяват програмите за предотвратяване на образуването на отпадъци и като минимум ги преразглеждат поне веднъж на всеки пет години .
Member States shall regularly evaluate the waste prevention programmes, and as a minimum revise them at least every five years.
Европейската агенция за околна среда включва в годишния си доклад преглед на напредъка по изпълнението и прилагането на такива програми.
The European Environment Agency shall include in its annual report a review of progress in the completion and implementation of such programmes.
They were Germany, Denmark, Greece, Finland, Portugal, Sweden, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia.
They were Germany , Denmark , Greece , Finland , Portugal , Sweden , the Czech Republic , Slovenia and Slovakia .
Reintroduces Amendment 71 from first reading.
Reintroduces Amendment 71 from first reading.
Член 29 a (нов)
Article 29 a (new)
Член 29a
Article 29a
Докладът се представя на Европейския парламент и на Съвета в срок от шест месеца след неговото завършване, по целесъобразност придружен от предложения.
The report shall be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council within six months of its completion, accompanied by proposals as appropriate.
В доклада по-специално се взема под внимание:
The report shall in particular consider:
a) дали Приложение II следва да се измени с цел:
(a) whether Annex II should be amended in order to:
i) да се изключат случаите, когато изброените дейности не водят до това достатъчно голяма част от отпадъците да служат за полезна цел, за да съответстват на целта, определена в член 1,
(i) omit cases where listed operations do not lead to a sufficiently high proportion of the waste serving a useful purpose to be consistent with the objective set out in Article 1,
ii) да се идентифицират случаите, при които е необходимо да се уточни какво е съотношението между отпадъците, които се използват, и отпадъците, които се обезвреждат при дейности по оползотворяване, за да се осигури постигането на целта, определена в член 1,
(ii) identify cases where the proportion of waste being used as opposed to that which is disposed of as part of a recovery operation should be specified in order to ensure that the objective set out in Article 1 is met,
iii) да се уточнят различно равнище или равнища на енергийна ефективност във връзка с дейностите по оползотворяване R1,
(iii) specify a different energy efficiency level or levels in relation to recovery operation R1,
iv) да се адаптират всички препоръки в светлината на научния и технически прогрес;
(iv) adapt any references in the light of technical and scientific progress;
б) дали Приложение I следва да се измени с цел:
(b) whether Annex I should be amended in order to:
i) да се добавят дейности, които не са включени в Приложение II,
(i) add any operations omitted from Annex II,
ii) да се адаптират всички препоръки в светлината на научния и технически прогрес; и
(ii) adapt any references in the light of technical and scientific progress; and
в) дали определянето на минимални стандарти за специфични дейности по обезвреждане или оползотворяване ще допринесе за постигането на целите, определени в член 10.
(c) whether specifying minimum standards for particular disposal or recovery operations will contribute to the objectives set out in Article 10.
Изискването да се представи този доклад не означава, че междувременно Комисията не може да представя предложения.
The requirement for this report will not prevent the Commission from coming forward with any proposals in the meantime.
Reintroduces amendment 61 adopted in first reading.
Reintroduces amendment 61 adopted in first reading.
The proposal includes numerous references to the commitology procedure which leaves several important areas subject to amendment without proper scrutiny.
The proposal includes numerous references to the commitology procedure which leaves several important areas subject to amendment without proper scrutiny.
The Commission must have in mind specific proposals already for the areas where it has proposed comitology procedures and it should therefore be in a position to bring these forward quickly.
The Commission must have in mind specific proposals already for the areas where it has proposed comitology procedures and it should therefore be in a position to bring these forward quickly.
Член 32 - параграф 1
Article 32 ‑ paragraph 1
Организациите или предприятията, посочени в член 20, параграф 1, причинителите на опасни отпадъци и организациите и предприятията, които събират или превозват опасни отпадъци по занятие, или действат като търговци и брокери на опасни отпадъци, водят отчет за количеството, естеството и произхода на отпадъците и, където е уместно, предназначението, периодичността на събиране, начина на транспортиране и метода на третиране, предвидени за отпадъка, и предоставят тази информация на компетентните органи при поискване.
The establishments or undertakings referred to in Article 20(1), the producers of hazardous waste and the establishments and undertakings which collect or transport hazardous waste on a professional basis, or act as dealers and brokers of hazardous waste, shall keep a record of the quantity, nature and origin of the waste, and, where relevant, the destination, frequency of collection, mode of transport and treatment method foreseen in respect of the waste, and shall make that information available, on request, to the competent authorities.
Организациите или предприятията, посочени в член 20, параграф 1, причинителите на опасни отпадъци и организациите и предприятията, които събират или превозват опасни отпадъци по занятие, или действат като търговци и брокери на опасни отпадъци, водят хронологичен отчет за количеството, естеството и произхода на отпадъците и, където е уместно, предназначението, периодичността на събиране, начина на транспортиране и метода на третиране, предвидени за отпадъка, и предоставят тази информация на компетентните органи при поискване.
The establishments or undertakings referred to in Article 20(1), the producers of hazardous waste and the establishments and undertakings which collect or transport hazardous waste on a professional basis, or act as dealers and brokers of hazardous waste, shall keep a chronological record of the quantity, nature and origin of the waste, and, where relevant, the destination, frequency of collection, mode of transport and treatment method foreseen in respect of the waste, and shall make that information available, on request, to the competent authorities.
Amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading (amendment 74).
Amendment adopted by Parliament at first reading (amendment 74).
Член 32 – параграф 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Документацията за опасни отпадъци се съхранява за срок от най-малко три години, с изключение на организации и предприятия, транспортиращи опасни отпадъци, които трябва да съхраняват тази документация за период от най-малко 12 месеца .
For hazardous waste, the records shall be preserved for at least three years except in the case of establishments and undertakings transporting hazardous waste which must keep such records for at least 12 months .
Документацията за опасни отпадъци се съхранява за срок от най-малко пет години .
For hazardous waste, the records shall be preserved for at least five years .
Документни доказателства, че дейностите по управление на отпадъците са извършени, се предоставят при поискване на компетентните органи или на предишен притежател.
Documentary evidence that the management operations have been carried out shall be supplied at the request of the competent authorities or of a previous holder.
Държавите-членки гарантират, че националните компетентни органи водят регистър за всички учреждения и предприятия, посочени в Глава ІV, и могат да изискат от тези учреждения и предприятия да предоставят доклади.
Member States shall ensure that the national competent authorities keep a register of all establishments and undertakings referred to in Chapter IV, and may require those establishments and undertakings to provide reports.
(Възстановяване на изменение 74 от първо четене)
(Reinstatement of amendment 74 of first reading)
Hazardous waste treatment as well as transports of hazardous wastes are serious matters.
Hazardous waste treatment as well as transports of hazardous wastes are serious matters.
Records for both should be kept for five years to allow sufficient traceability.
Records for both should be kept for five years to allow sufficient traceability.
All establishments or undertakings dealing with waste should be recorded in a register.
All establishments or undertakings dealing with waste should be recorded in a register.
Член 34 – параграф 4 а (нов)
Article 34 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Не по-късно от...* въз основа на доклад на Комисията, придружен от предложение, Европейският парламент и Съветът извършват преглед на формулите за съоръженията за изгаряне, посочени в бележката под линия към R1 в Приложение II.
Not later than ...*, the European Parliament and the Council shall, on the basis of a Commission report accompanied by a proposal, review the formula for the incineration facilities referred to in Annex II in the footnote to R1.
Докладът на Комисията се изготвя въз основа на уведомленията от държавите-членки относно съоръженията за изгаряне на тяхна територия, които при използване на формулата в бележката под линия към R1 в Приложение II са обявени за инсталации за оползотворяване.
The Commission report shall be compiled on the basis of notifications by the Member States of the incineration facilities declared as recovery facilities on their territory using the formula in Annex II in the footnote to R1.
Докладът на Комисията преразглежда това дали формулата е произвела очакваното въздействие и дали е създала съществен импулс за построяване и експлоатация на съоръжения за изгаряне с висока степен на енергийна ефективност.
The Commission report shall review whether the formula has had the anticipated effect and created a crucial incentive for building and operating more incineration facilities with high energy efficiency.
За да може компетентният орган да обяви съоръжението за инсталация за оползотворяване или обезвреждане въз основа на формулата в бележката под линия към R1 в Приложение II, операторът на съоръжението посочва конкретно какво количество закупена енергия е необходимо за третирането на отпадъците, както и вида и количеството на отделената енергия (електрическа и топлинна).
In order for the competent authority to declare the facility a recovery or disposal facility on the basis of the formula in Annex II in the footnote to R1, the operator of the facility shall indicate in particular how much purchased energy is required for the waste treatment and the form and quantity of energy emitted (electric and thermal).
* Две години след влизането в сила на настоящата директива.
*Two years after the entry into force of this Directive.
Based on the underlying aim of amendment 83 that was adopted at first reading and sought to delete the energy efficiency formula, this compromise should above all lead to transparency regarding the classification of incineration facilities as recovery facilities and also review the formula to see whether the desired effect is also achieved.
Based on the underlying aim of amendment 83 that was adopted at first reading and sought to delete the energy efficiency formula, this compromise should above all lead to transparency regarding the classification of incineration facilities as recovery facilities and also review the formula to see whether the desired effect is also achieved.
Член 35 – параграф 1 – алинея 1
Article 35 ‑paragraph 1 ‑ subparagraph 1
Комисията може да разработи насоки за тълкуване на определенията за оползотворяване и обезвреждане , установени в член 3, точки 14 и 18 .
The Commission may develop guidelines for the interpretation of the definitions of recovery and disposal in points (14) and (18) of Article 3 .
Комисията може да разработи насоки за тълкуване на определенията за оползотворяване и обезвреждане.
The Commission may develop guidelines for the interpretation of the definitions of recovery and disposal.
In accordance with article 20.4, “ it shall be a condition of any permit covering incineration or coincineration with energy recovery that the recovery of energy is to take place with a high level of energy efficiency.”
In accordance with article 20.4, “ it shall be a condition of any permit covering incineration or coincineration with energy recovery that the recovery of energy is to take place with a high level of energy efficiency.”
To this end, an energy efficiency formula should be published as technical guidance to be applied to ALL incineration facilities, irrelevant as to whether they are classed as recovery or disposal.
To this end, an energy efficiency formula should be published as technical guidance to be applied to ALL incineration facilities, irrelevant as to whether they are classed as recovery or disposal.
Приложение І - точка D 7
Annex I – point D 7
D 7 Изхвърляне в морета и океани, включително заравяне под морското дъно
D 7 Release to seas/oceans including sea-bed insertion
EP Amendment at first Reading.
EP Amendment at first Reading.
At its first reading, the European Parliament adopted some important amendments to the draft directive.
At its first reading, the European Parliament adopted some important amendments to the draft directive.
It will now insist on their survival in the second reading.
It will now insist on their survival in the second reading.
Key amendments in this category were the introduction of targets for recycling and waste prevention, and the insistence on a five-stage waste hierarchy as a general rule.
Key amendments in this category were the introduction of targets for recycling and waste prevention, and the insistence on a five-stage waste hierarchy as a general rule.
The Council has erased all reference to targets but the rapporteur has restored the Parliament’s amendments in a modified form, having consulted the Commission.
The Council has erased all reference to targets but the rapporteur has restored the Parliament’s amendments in a modified form, having consulted the Commission.
The changes are designed to make the texts more acceptable to the Council, and, in the case of the waste prevention target and industrial waste recycling target, to take account of the need to proceed on a sound statistical base.
The changes are designed to make the texts more acceptable to the Council, and, in the case of the waste prevention target and industrial waste recycling target, to take account of the need to proceed on a sound statistical base.
In the view of the rapporteur and of the Committee, it would be wrong to miss this opportunity to ensure that this directive does more than supply a set of definitions.
In the view of the rapporteur and of the Committee, it would be wrong to miss this opportunity to ensure that this directive does more than supply a set of definitions.
It is important that there is a real link between it and the aspirations about recycling and prevention set out in the Thematic Strategy on Waste.
It is important that there is a real link between it and the aspirations about recycling and prevention set out in the Thematic Strategy on Waste.
Without the targets no such link really exists.
Without the targets no such link really exists.
There will no doubt be another dispute between the Parliament and the Council on the extent to which the 5 stage waste hierarchy applies and how departures from it may take place.
There will no doubt be another dispute between the Parliament and the Council on the extent to which the 5 stage waste hierarchy applies and how departures from it may take place.
The Parliament wants the hierarchy to apply as a “general rule” and the Council prefers the words “guiding principle”.
The Parliament wants the hierarchy to apply as a “general rule” and the Council prefers the words “guiding principle”.
The rapporteur is not wholly convinced that in the dust of battle at local level the fine distinctions between the two phrases will always be perceived.
The rapporteur is not wholly convinced that in the dust of battle at local level the fine distinctions between the two phrases will always be perceived.
The key aspect of the issue is that the directive must make clear that departures from the hierarchy cannot take place casually but must be done as part of an ordered process.
The key aspect of the issue is that the directive must make clear that departures from the hierarchy cannot take place casually but must be done as part of an ordered process.
The original Parliament amendment made the process of departure unduly complex: the rapporteur has simplified it on the basis that national procedures regarding public involvement must apply.
The original Parliament amendment made the process of departure unduly complex: the rapporteur has simplified it on the basis that national procedures regarding public involvement must apply.
One important aim of the directive is to draw a clear distinction between what is considered “recovery” and what is “disposal” of waste, since Court of Justice judgements put the question in doubt.
One important aim of the directive is to draw a clear distinction between what is considered “recovery” and what is “disposal” of waste, since Court of Justice judgements put the question in doubt.
The amendments adopted at first reading included a definition of “recovery” that would extend the designation to energy from waste plants fulfilling certain energy efficiency criteria: first reading amendments hostile to the concept of securing energy from waste were not adopted.
The amendments adopted at first reading included a definition of “recovery” that would extend the designation to energy from waste plants fulfilling certain energy efficiency criteria: first reading amendments hostile to the concept of securing energy from waste were not adopted.
But an amendment was adopted which deleted the draft energy efficiency formula in Annex II.
But an amendment was adopted which deleted the draft energy efficiency formula in Annex II.
This would have been the yardstick for determining which energy from waste plants could qualify as “recovery” operations.
This would have been the yardstick for determining which energy from waste plants could qualify as “recovery” operations.
The rapporteur believes that energy from waste plants can play an important part in dealing with residual waste, which might otherwise go to landfill.
The rapporteur believes that energy from waste plants can play an important part in dealing with residual waste, which might otherwise go to landfill.
She also sees waste as a potentially important fuel at a time when the EU is facing an energy crisis and is increasingly dependent on insecure foreign sources of fuel.
She also sees waste as a potentially important fuel at a time when the EU is facing an energy crisis and is increasingly dependent on insecure foreign sources of fuel.
Our waste is at least home-grown.
Our waste is at least home-grown.
Heat and power can be recovered from it.
Heat and power can be recovered from it.
The experience of a number of member states shows that energy from waste can complement recycling and not drive it out.
The experience of a number of member states shows that energy from waste can complement recycling and not drive it out.
It would surely be a desirable development to apply an energy efficiency formula which “recovery” plants must comply with.
It would surely be a desirable development to apply an energy efficiency formula which “recovery” plants must comply with.
Above all such a formula would be a crucial incentive to those building new plants to give priority to energy efficiency.
Above all such a formula would be a crucial incentive to those building new plants to give priority to energy efficiency.
But it is clear to the rapporteur that there are some MEP colleagues who are opposed fundamentally to the idea of energy from waste plants and who will never vote for them in any shape or form.
But it is clear to the rapporteur that there are some MEP colleagues who are opposed fundamentally to the idea of energy from waste plants and who will never vote for them in any shape or form.
There are other MEPs, mainly from countries still in the early stages of diverting their waste from landfill, who fear that energy from waste could become the predominant waste management process in their countries, and that it would then discourage investment in recycling, re-use and prevention.
There are other MEPs, mainly from countries still in the early stages of diverting their waste from landfill, who fear that energy from waste could become the predominant waste management process in their countries, and that it would then discourage investment in recycling, re-use and prevention.
This is where the Parliament’s insistence on the adoption of recycling and prevention targets is so important.
This is where the Parliament’s insistence on the adoption of recycling and prevention targets is so important.