natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
На всеки три години от датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент Комисията отправя искане към STECF за оценка на напредъка за възстановяването на всеки изчерпан запас от атлантическа треска.
Every three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall request STECF to evaluate the progress towards recovery of each depleted cod stock .
Освен това, Комисията иска мнението на съответните регионални консултативни съвети и държави-членки по отношение на ефективното управление на запасите от атлантическа треска.
In addition, the Commission shall seek the views of the relevant Regional Advisory Councils and Member States as to the effective management of cod stocks.
Ако риболовците наистина се насърчават да се включат в програми за избягване на улова на атлантическа треска, регионалните консултативни съвети трябва със сигурност изцяло да бъдат ангажирани в оценяването на регламента.
If fishermen are genuinely to be encouraged to engage in cod-avoidance programmes, the RACs must surely be fully involved in the evaluation of the Regulation.
Освен това, ако държавите-членки трябва да бъдат насърчавани за играят роля за гарантирането на дълготрайни риболовни практики, те изрично трябва да бъдат признати за ключови участници в оценките.
Furthermore, if Member States are to be encouraged to take a role in ensuring sustainable fishing practices, they should be explicitly recognised as key stakeholders in evaluations.
Общата политика в областта на рибното стопанство навлиза в период на преразглеждане с оглед осъществяването на съществена реформа.
The CFP is entering a review period with a view to substantial reform.
Изричното позоваване на регионалните консултативни съвети и на държавите-членки в това законодателство би показало ясно, че институциите на ЕС са сериозни по въпроса за ангажирането на тези участници в бъдещите действия по развиването на системите за управление на рибното стопанство.
Express reference to the RACs and Member States in this legislation would give a clear indication that the EU institutions are serious about involving those stakeholders in future development of fisheries management systems.
Член 1 - точка 4
Article 1 — point 4
Глава ІV - заглавие
Chapter IV — title
Ограничаване на риболовното усилие
Fishing effort limitation
Определяне на риболовното усилие
Fishing effort determination
Терминът "определяне" е по-подходящ за целите на регламента.
The term 'determination' is more appropriate to the purpose of the regulation.
Член 8а - параграф 2 - буква а
Article 8a – paragraph 2 – point a
а) за първата година на прилагане на настоящия регламент базовата линия се установява като средното усилие в kW/дни, изразходвано през 2005, 2006 и 2007 г. , въз основа на становището на STECF.
(a) for the first year of application of this Regulation the baseline shall be established as the average effort in kW-days spent during the years 2005, 2006 and 2007 , based on the advice of STECF.
а) за първата година на прилагане на настоящия регламент базовата линия се установява като средното усилие в kW/дни, изразходвано през 2004, 2005 и 2006 г. , въз основа на становището на STECF.
(a) for the first year of application of this Regulation the baseline shall be established as the average effort in kW-days spent during the years 2004, 2005 and 2006 , based on the advice of STECF.
За да се гарантира, че използваните данни са с високо качество и надеждност, 2004-2006 г. следва да бъдат използвани като референтни години.
To ensure that the data used are of high quality and reliability, 2004-2006 should be used as the reference years.
Член 1 - точка 4
Article 1 – point 4
Член 8а - параграф 3 - уводна част
Article 8a – paragraph 3 – introductory part
За групи за риболовно усилие, които на базата на годишната оценка на данните за управление на риболовното усилие, представени в съответствие с членове 18, 19 и 20 от Регламент (ЕО) № ххх/2008 са допринесли най-много за общия улов на атлантическа треска и чийто общ улов , според същата оценка, съдържа най-малко 80% атлантическа треска, максимално допустимото риболовно усилие се изчислява, както следва:
For effort groups which on the basis of the annual evaluation of the fishing effort management data submitted in accordance with Articles 18, 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No xxx/2008 have contributed most to the total catch of cod and whose total catch on basis of that evaluation consists by at least 80% of cod, the maximum allowable fishing effort shall be calculated as follows:
За групи за риболовно усилие, които на базата на годишната оценка на данните за управление на риболовното усилие, представени в съответствие с членове 18, 19 и 20 от Регламент (ЕО) № ххх/2008 са допринесли най-много за общия улов на атлантическа треска (не касае българската версия) и чийто натрупан улов , според същата оценка, съдържа най-малко 80% атлантическа треска, максимално допустимото риболовно усилие се изчислява, както следва:
For effort groups which on the basis of the annual evaluation of the fishing effort management data submitted in accordance with Articles 18, 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No xxx/2008 have contributed most to the total catch of cod overall and whose accumulated catches on basis of that evaluation consists by at least 80% of cod, the maximum allowable fishing effort shall be calculated as follows:
Следва да бъде уточнено, че категориите, свързани със скоростта, които допринасят за 80% от общия улов на треска са тези, които допринасят за намаляването на смъртността при риболова.
It should be clarified that it is the categories of gear which contribute to 80% of the total cod catches which are to contribute to a reduction in fishing mortality.
Член 8а - параграф 3 - буква а
Article 8a – paragraph 3 – point a
а) в приложното поле на член 6, чрез прилагане към базовата линия на същото намаление в проценти, като определеното в член 6 за смъртността от риболов.
(a) where Article 6 applies, by applying to the baseline the same percentage reduction as that set out in Article 6 for fishing mortality;
а) в приложното поле на член 6, чрез прилагане към базовата линия на същата промяна в проценти, като определеното в член 6 за смъртността от риболов.
(a) where Article 6 applies, by applying to the baseline the same percentage change as that set out in Article 6 for fishing mortality;
Следва да се вземе предвид фактът, че риболовното усилие може също така да бъде увеличено, при условие че смъртността при риболова е под целта от F = 0.4.
Account should be taken of the fact that the fishing effort can also be increased provided fishing mortality is less than the target F = 0.4.
Такъв може би ще бъде случаят тази година, например, с висока степен на наемане, при което максималната стойност на ТАС от 15% означава, че смъртността при риболова ще падне под F = 0.4.
This may be the case this year, for example, with a high level of recruitment, where the maximum margin for the TAC of 15% means that fishing mortality will fall below F = 0.4.
Член 8б - параграф 1 - уводна част
Article 8b – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Всяка държава-членка взема решение по отношение на корабите, плаващи под нейния флаг, за метода за разпределение на максимално допустимото риболовно усилие за единични кораби, основавайки се на следните критерии:
For the vessels flying its flag, each Member State shall decide on a method for allocating the maximum allowable fishing effort to individual vessels, based on the following criteria:
Всяка държава-членка взема решение по отношение на корабите, плаващи под нейния флаг, за метода за разпределение на максимално допустимото риболовно усилие за единични кораби, в светлината на определен брой критерии , в това число например :
For the vessels flying its flag, each Member State shall decide on a method for allocating the maximum allowable fishing effort to individual vessels, in the light of a number of criteria , including, for example :
Един от ключовите елементи в схемата за киловат/дни е да гарантира, че самите държави-членки са достатъчно гъвкави, за са определят кой критерий да бъде използван при разпределянето на броя киловат/дни, които се отпускат на плавателните съдове.
One of the key points in the kW-days scheme is to ensure that Member States have the flexibility themselves to define which criteria to use to distribute the number of kW-days allocated to vessels.
Член 8б - параграф 3
Article 8b – paragraph 3
За всяка група за риболовно усилие общият капацитет, изразен едновременно в брутен тонаж и в kW, за кораби, разполагащи със специално разрешително за риболов, издадено в съответствие с параграф 2, следва да не бъде по-голям от капацитета на корабите, активни през 2007 г., използващи риболовни съоръжения и осъществявали риболов в съответната риболовна зона.
For each effort group, the total capacity expressed both in GT and kW of the vessels having special fishing permits issued in accordance with paragraph 2 shall not be greater than the capacity of the vessels that have been active in 2007 using the gear and fishing in the geographical area concerned.
Член 8 г - уводна част
Article 8d – introductory part
Максимално допустимото риболовно усилие, установено в съответствие с член 8а, се адаптира от съответните държави-членки с оглед на:
The maximum allowable fishing effort established in accordance with Article 8a shall be adapted by the Member States concerned in view of:
Максимално допустимото риболовно усилие, установено в съответствие с член 8а, може да се адаптира от съответните държави-членки с оглед на:
The maximum allowable fishing effort established in accordance with Article 8a may be adapted by the Member States concerned in view of:
При промяната на по-слабите квоти няма необходимост от промяна в риболовното усилие и това следва следователно да не бъде условие, а възможност.
In changing minor quotas, there is no need to change the fishing effort and this should therefore not be a requirement but a possibility.
Член 8д - параграф 3
Article 8e – paragraph 3
Прехвърлянето е разрешено само от група риболовни съоръжения, показваща, относно атлантическата треска, улов за единица усилие, по-голям от улова за единица усилие на получаващата група съоръжения.
The transfer shall only be allowed from a donor gear grouping having shown, for cod, a catch per unit effort (cpue) larger that the cpue of the receiving gear grouping.
Държавите-членки, отправили искането за прехвърляне, осигуряват необходимата информация за улова за единица усилие.
The Member State requesting the transfer shall provide the necessary cpue information.
Прехвърлянето е разрешено по принцип само от група риболовни съоръжения, показваща, относно атлантическата треска, улов за единица усилие, по-голям от улова за единица усилие на получаващата група съоръжения.
The transfer shall only be allowed in principle from a donor gear grouping having shown, for cod, a catch per unit effort (cpue) larger that the cpue of the receiving gear grouping.
Когато даден трансфер се извършва от една група риболовни съоръжения към друга група риболовни съоръжения с по висок улов за единица усилие, прехвърленото усилие следва да бъде предмет на ограничаване под форма на по-специфично дефиниран коригиращ коефициент.
Where a transfer is from one donor gear grouping to another donor gear grouping with a higher cpue, the effort transferred shall be subject to a reduction in the form of a more specifically defined correction factor.
От съществено значение е да има достатъчна гъвкавост, за да може да се отговори на изискванията на външните обстоятелства.
It is essential to have sufficient flexibility to be able to respond to external circumstances.
Например, нарастващите цени на горивата могат да насърчат риболовците да преминат към по-икономичен риболов с хрелни мрежи, но ако подобен риболов има по-голям улов за единица усилие от риболова с бийм тралове, например, не може да бъде извършен трансфер на риболовно усилие съгласно предложения член 8 д, параграф 3.
For example, rising fuel prices may encourage fishermen to switch to less fuel-consuming gill net fishing but if such gill net fisheries have a higher cpue than beam trawl fisheries, for example, there can be no transfer of fishing effort under the proposed Article 8e, paragraph 3.
Член 1 - точка 6
Article 1 – point 6
Процедура за вземане на решения
Decision-making procedure
Когато настоящият регламент предвижда вземане на решение от Съвета, Съветът взема решение с квалифицирано мнозинство по предложение на Комисията.
Where this Regulation provides for decisions to be taken by the Council, the Council shall act by qualified majority on the basis of a proposal from the Commission.
Не следва да бъде въвеждана никаква специална процедура за вземане на решение, която да изключва Парламента от процеса на вземане на решение, освен ако няма конкретна изключителна обосновка за това.
No special decision-making procedure should be introduced which excludes Parliament from the decision-making process, unless there is an entirely exceptional justification therefor.
Since November 2000, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has drawn attention to the fact that there is a serious risk of a collapse in cod stocks in the North Sea and off west Scotland, and at the Council meeting held in December the same year, Fisheries Ministers and the Commission expressed concern at the critical state of stocks.
Since November 2000, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has drawn attention to the fact that there is a serious risk of a collapse in cod stocks in the North Sea and off west Scotland, and at the Council meeting held in December the same year, Fisheries Ministers and the Commission expressed concern at the critical state of stocks.
It was noted on that occasion that fishing pressure is too high and that too many small juvenile fish were being caught, resulting in a large volume of discards.
It was noted on that occasion that fishing pressure is too high and that too many small juvenile fish were being caught, resulting in a large volume of discards.
Both of these factors have eroded the quantity of adult fish (biomass) to such a degree that it is highly probable that stocks can no longer regenerate themselves through reproduction.
Both of these factors have eroded the quantity of adult fish (biomass) to such a degree that it is highly probable that stocks can no longer regenerate themselves through reproduction.
If fishing pressure remains unchanged and such large quantities of juvenile fish continue to be caught, stocks will not be sustainable.
If fishing pressure remains unchanged and such large quantities of juvenile fish continue to be caught, stocks will not be sustainable.
Stocks are in a critical state and there is therefore an urgent need for recovery plans, as the Commission noted in its Communication on rebuilding stocks of cod and hake in Community and adjacent waters (COM(2001)326).
Stocks are in a critical state and there is therefore an urgent need for recovery plans, as the Commission noted in its Communication on rebuilding stocks of cod and hake in Community and adjacent waters (COM(2001)326).
In 2004, the Council adopted the ‘cod recovery plan’, the overall objective of which is to ensure the safe recovery of cod stocks to the precautionary stock sizes advised by scientists within a timeframe of five to 10 years.
In 2004, the Council adopted the ‘cod recovery plan’, the overall objective of which is to ensure the safe recovery of cod stocks to the precautionary stock sizes advised by scientists within a timeframe of five to 10 years.
COMMISSION’S PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
COMMISSION’S PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Scientific advice from the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) has indicated that the reductions arising from the collective effort of total allowable catches (TACs), technical measures and complementary effort management regulations have been far from sufficient to reduce fishing mortality to the level required to allow cod stocks to rebuild.
Scientific advice from the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) has indicated that the reductions arising from the collective effort of total allowable catches (TACs), technical measures and complementary effort management regulations have been far from sufficient to reduce fishing mortality to the level required to allow cod stocks to rebuild.
In the light of that assessment and the experience gained, the Commission submitted proposals for the following amendments in April 2008:
In the light of that assessment and the experience gained, the Commission submitted proposals for the following amendments in April 2008:
The objectives are to be revised in order to obtain the highest sustainable yield even if oceanic conditions change as a result of global warming.
The objectives are to be revised in order to obtain the highest sustainable yield even if oceanic conditions change as a result of global warming.
The effort management system is to be simplified since it has become so complex that a new system is needed, based on effort ceilings to be managed by Member States, which will have more flexibility and therefore achieve more efficient implementation.
The effort management system is to be simplified since it has become so complex that a new system is needed, based on effort ceilings to be managed by Member States, which will have more flexibility and therefore achieve more efficient implementation.
The plan is to be adapted to different levels of recovery and it therefore incorporates a modular strategy where the adjustment of fishing mortality is a function of the level of recovery achieved.
The plan is to be adapted to different levels of recovery and it therefore incorporates a modular strategy where the adjustment of fishing mortality is a function of the level of recovery achieved.
Clear rules are to be introduced and applied when and where scientists cannot provide precise estimates of stock status.
Clear rules are to be introduced and applied when and where scientists cannot provide precise estimates of stock status.
The need to reduce discards by introducing new mechanisms to encourage fishermen to engage in cod-avoidance programmes.
The need to reduce discards by introducing new mechanisms to encourage fishermen to engage in cod-avoidance programmes.
The recovery plan is to be extended to include the Celtic Sea as this stock has also proved to be equally overexploited as the other cod stocks in Community waters.
The recovery plan is to be extended to include the Celtic Sea as this stock has also proved to be equally overexploited as the other cod stocks in Community waters.
Overall, the Commission wishes to amend the existing cod recovery plan in order to make it more complete, updated to recent developments, simpler, more efficient and easier to implement, monitor and control.
Overall, the Commission wishes to amend the existing cod recovery plan in order to make it more complete, updated to recent developments, simpler, more efficient and easier to implement, monitor and control.
RAPPORTEUR’S REMARKS
RAPPORTEUR’S REMARKS
The success of the recovery plan is also dependent on not landing fish caught through illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.
The success of the recovery plan is also dependent on not landing fish caught through illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.
Monitoring and control are, therefore, important instruments to ensure the enforcement of fishing regulations.
Monitoring and control are, therefore, important instruments to ensure the enforcement of fishing regulations.
Owing to the importance of cod fisheries, its impact on fishing for other species and the major economic and social interests at stake, the recovery plan for cod stocks must be successfully implemented.
Owing to the importance of cod fisheries, its impact on fishing for other species and the major economic and social interests at stake, the recovery plan for cod stocks must be successfully implemented.
The cod recovery plan has serious implications for the fishing industry and its related local communities but if the plan does not succeed, the implications are, everything else being equal, even greater and more serious and a successful recovery plan must therefore have utmost priority.
The cod recovery plan has serious implications for the fishing industry and its related local communities but if the plan does not succeed, the implications are, everything else being equal, even greater and more serious and a successful recovery plan must therefore have utmost priority.
From a purely biological viewpoint, the best method of promoting a swift recovery of cod stocks is to completely prohibit all fisheries where there is a risk of catching cod.
From a purely biological viewpoint, the best method of promoting a swift recovery of cod stocks is to completely prohibit all fisheries where there is a risk of catching cod.
Such an approach would have enormous social and economic implications as cod is caught in mixed fisheries, which would also mean banning fishing for other species, including haddock, whiting, Norway lobster, plaice, sole, angler, megrim, etc.
Such an approach would have enormous social and economic implications as cod is caught in mixed fisheries, which would also mean banning fishing for other species, including haddock, whiting, Norway lobster, plaice, sole, angler, megrim, etc.
To avoid ending up in such a situation, the recovery plan must produce visible positive results.
To avoid ending up in such a situation, the recovery plan must produce visible positive results.
It is a general problem when Member States do not adhere to the Commission’s proposals for TACs and instead, make compromises and set higher TACs than those recommended by scientific experts.
It is a general problem when Member States do not adhere to the Commission’s proposals for TACs and instead, make compromises and set higher TACs than those recommended by scientific experts.
At the abovementioned Council meeting in December 2000, the Fisheries Ministers adopted markedly reduced TACs for cod and hake and moderately reduced TACs for related species.
At the abovementioned Council meeting in December 2000, the Fisheries Ministers adopted markedly reduced TACs for cod and hake and moderately reduced TACs for related species.
With the exception of North Sea cod, which is covered by a TAC agreed with Norway, higher TACs were set than those proposed by the Commission.
With the exception of North Sea cod, which is covered by a TAC agreed with Norway, higher TACs were set than those proposed by the Commission.
Even in a crisis situation, the Member States are unable to agree on measures which are more consistent with the scientific advice.
Even in a crisis situation, the Member States are unable to agree on measures which are more consistent with the scientific advice.
The depletion of cod stocks in the Atlantic Ocean off the east coast of Canada, to which cod has never returned despite a ban on fishing since 1992, should serve as a deterrent and a warning not to delay in adopting the measures required.
The depletion of cod stocks in the Atlantic Ocean off the east coast of Canada, to which cod has never returned despite a ban on fishing since 1992, should serve as a deterrent and a warning not to delay in adopting the measures required.
Възстановяването на запасите от атлантическа треска
Recovery of cod stocks
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Paulo Casaca, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Pedro Guerreiro, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Struan Stevenson, Margie Sudre, Cornelis Visser
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Paulo Casaca, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Pedro Guerreiro, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Struan Stevenson, Margie Sudre, Cornelis Visser
Colm Burke, Ole Christensen, Eleonora Lo Curto, Jan Mulder, Teresa Riera Madurell, Kathy Sinnott, Thomas Wise
Colm Burke, Ole Christensen, Eleonora Lo Curto, Jan Mulder, Teresa Riera Madurell, Kathy Sinnott, Thomas Wise