natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Изисква Комисията да докладва за вътрешната си организационна структура на политиката за намаляване на административния товар; изисква да се сравни тази структура със структурите, използвани в различните държави-членки, които вече имат действаща политика за намаляване на административния товар;
Asks the Commission to report on its internal organisational set-up for the administrative burden reduction policy; Asks it to compare this set-up with the set-ups used in the various Member States that already have an administrative burden reduction policy in place;
Изисква от Комисията да оцени добавената стойност на Съвета за оценка на въздействието (СОВ) в процедурите за оценка на въздействието до 2008 г.; приканва Комисията да докладва по-специално за въздействието на СОВ в сравнение с въздействието на независимите консултативни съвети в различните държави - членки и да оцени максималната възможна добавена стойност на наистина независима критична оценка на европейско ниво;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the added value of the Impact Assessment Board (IAB) in the impact assessment procedures by 2008; invites the Commission to report specifically on the impact of the IAB in comparison to the impact of independent advisory boards in different Member States and to assess the maximum possible added value of truly independent scrutiny at a European level;
Предлага кредитите, предвидени в ред 26 01 08 от бюджета на ЕС за пилотен проект за намаляване до минимум на административния товар, да бъдат използвани за създаване на екип от независими експерти, които трябва да бъдат представители на всички групи заинтересовани лица и изцяло да наблюдават въвеждането на Програмата за действие: Намаляване на административния товар в ЕС; изтъква, че това означава също така, че екипът от независими експерти може да спре своето внимание върху всички процедури, измервания и законодателни предложения относно въздействието извън 13-те приоритетни области;
Proposes that the appropriations reserved on the line 26 01 08 of the EU Budget for a pilot project minimizing administrative burdens be used to set up an independent panel of experts, comprising representatives from all stakeholder groups, to fully monitor implementation of the Action Programme 'Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU'; Points out that this also means that the independent expert committee can focus on all impact procedures, measurements and legislative proposals outside the 13 priority areas;
Подчертава, че избирането и работата на този екип от експерти трябва да бъдат напълно прозрачни и членовете на този екип следва да попълнят декларация за интерес;
Underlines that the election and work of this panel of experts should be fully transparent and that members of the panel should be required to complete a declaration of interests;
Изразява задоволство от подкрепата, оказана вече на този подход от Съвета и Комисията, както е посочено в параграф 25 от заключенията на председателството на пролетното заседание на Европейския съвет, проведен на 8 и 9 март 2007 г.; подчертава, че това също така е в съответствие с препоръките, дадени от Националния съвет за контрол на нормите (Германия), Комисията за по-добро регулиране (Великобритания) и Холандската консултативна комисия по административен товар (Холандия) в техния документ, изразяващ позицията им по Програмата за действие на Комисията
Expresses its satisfaction at the support already given to this approach by the Council and Commission, as stated in paragraph 25 of the Presidency conclusions of the Spring Council of 8 and 9 March 2007; emphasises that this is also in line with the recommendations given by the Nationaler Normenkonntrollrat (Germany), Better Regulation Commission (United Kingdom) and the Dutch Advisory Board on Administrative Burden (The Netherlands) in their position paper on the Commission's Action Programme
Документ, изразяващ позицията по "Програмата за действие за намаляване на административния товар в Европейския съюз" на Европейската комисия, 1 март 2007 г. ;
Position paper on the European Commission's 'Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union', 1 March 2007. ;
Предлага също така независимият екип, наред със своята работа по пълно наблюдение на изпълнението на Европейската програма за действие, да оцени също така и заключенията и резултата от консултациите по интернет и на местно ниво; предлага на независимия екип да се даде достъп до оценката за въздействието на предложенията за намаляване преди тяхното приемане от Комисията;
Proposes further that the independent panel, as well as fully supervising the implementation of the European Action Programme, also assess the findings and outcome of the Internet and local level consultations; proposes that the independent panel be granted access to the impact assessment of reduction proposals before their adoption by the Commission;
Изисква от Комисията да назначи независим представител за председател на екипа и екипът да заработи нормално през м. септември 2007 г.; изисква също така другите членове на екипа да представляват външните заинтересовани лица в законодателния процес, както и независими експерти и представители на академичната общност в сферата на намаляване на административния товар;
Asks the Commission to appoint an independent free-thinking representative to chair the panel and have the panel fully operational by September 2007; asks further that the other members of the panel reflect the external stakeholders in the legislative process and include independent experts and academics in the field of administrative burden reduction;
Изисква от Комисията да позволи на независимия екип да изрази становище и за вече предприетите през 2006 г. и 2007 г. стъпки, които установяват политиката за намаляване на административния товар;
Asks the Commission to allow the independent panel also to comment on the steps already undertaken in 2006 and 2007 and which set up the administrative burden reduction policy;
Възлага на своя председател да предаде настоящата резолюция на Съвета и на Комисията както и на правителствата и парламентите на държавите-членки.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Agrees that the regulatory environment in which businesses operate is a determinant of their competitiveness, sustainable growth and employment performance, and that ensuring that the existing and future regulatory environment is transparent, clear, effective and generally of high quality should be an important objective of EU policy;
Agrees that the regulatory environment in which businesses operate is a determinant of their competitiveness, sustainable growth and employment performance, and that ensuring that the existing and future regulatory environment is transparent, clear, effective and generally of high quality should be an important objective of EU policy;
Emphasises the importance of fully applying the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in adopting Community legislation;
Emphasises the importance of fully applying the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in adopting Community legislation;
Stresses that the effect of simplifying and updating existing legislation should not be deregulation, diluting health and safety legislation or dismantling basic social standards; calls on the Commission to make sure that legislation continues to deliver improvements in social standards whilst at the same time not being detrimental to business competitiveness; recognises that one important way of improving social standards is to reduce unemployment, by fostering a regulatory climate which promotes enterprise and job creation;
Stresses that the effect of simplifying and updating existing legislation should not be deregulation, diluting health and safety legislation or dismantling basic social standards; calls on the Commission to make sure that legislation continues to deliver improvements in social standards whilst at the same time not being detrimental to business competitiveness; recognises that one important way of improving social standards is to reduce unemployment, by fostering a regulatory climate which promotes enterprise and job creation;
Welcomes the interinstitutional agreement on better lawmaking and calls on the Council, the Commission and Parliament to make this a reality;
Welcomes the interinstitutional agreement on better lawmaking and calls on the Council, the Commission and Parliament to make this a reality;
Calls on the Commission, within the framework of the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making, to adopt targeted, well-considered legislation with predictable consequences which will contribute to creating favourable conditions by providing suitable incentives for undertakings and companies, reducing superfluous expenditure and procedures, removing barriers to adaptability and innovation and generally providing legal certainty;
Calls on the Commission, within the framework of the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making, to adopt targeted, well-considered legislation with predictable consequences which will contribute to creating favourable conditions by providing suitable incentives for undertakings and companies, reducing superfluous expenditure and procedures, removing barriers to adaptability and innovation and generally providing legal certainty;
Highlights the need for the Commission, the Member States and Parliament to cooperate and to commit to a common and comprehensive strategy to promote better regulation in order to strengthen the Partnership for Growth and Jobs, namely through the examination of the different national legislative frameworks and the incorporation of the best proven practices identified; calls on the Commission to respect the different practices and national strategies adopted by the Member States whether they implement European directives in the fields of employment and social protection through collective agreement or by regulation and law;
Highlights the need for the Commission, the Member States and Parliament to cooperate and to commit to a common and comprehensive strategy to promote better regulation in order to strengthen the Partnership for Growth and Jobs, namely through the examination of the different national legislative frameworks and the incorporation of the best proven practices identified; calls on the Commission to respect the different practices and national strategies adopted by the Member States whether they implement European directives in the fields of employment and social protection through collective agreement or by regulation and law;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that, during implementation of the impact assessment guidelines a study of economic activities improves the quality of the actual impact; insists that it is imperative that impact assessments, whether by a European institution or the Member States, are conducted in a thorough, transparent and balanced way, giving equal weight to social, economic and environmental aspects;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that, during implementation of the impact assessment guidelines a study of economic activities improves the quality of the actual impact; insists that it is imperative that impact assessments, whether by a European institution or the Member States, are conducted in a thorough, transparent and balanced way, giving equal weight to social, economic and environmental aspects;
Stresses the importance of better implementation and enforcement of existing legislation, especially social legislation and legislation to drive the completion of the internal market across all Member States, and calls for infringement procedures to be rapid in order to ensure a level playing field; calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve mechanisms for identifying legislation which must be simplified;
Stresses the importance of better implementation and enforcement of existing legislation, especially social legislation and legislation to drive the completion of the internal market across all Member States, and calls for infringement procedures to be rapid in order to ensure a level playing field; calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve mechanisms for identifying legislation which must be simplified;
Welcomes the emphasis which is put on early consultation of stakeholders, including the social partners, SMEs, legislators, law enforcement bodies and non-governmental organisations; underlines the role of social dialogue as a useful tool, contributing to better European governance by ensuring a better balance of interests through the involvement of all actors in decision-making and in the implementation process; stresses that 'all actors' must include those working in SMEs, as laid down in the SME Charter and agreed by the Lisbon Council; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to extend and enhance social dialogue at European level and, on the basis of the outcome, to continue to improve social standards without disregarding the need to preserve jobs.
Welcomes the emphasis which is put on early consultation of stakeholders, including the social partners, SMEs, legislators, law enforcement bodies and non-governmental organisations; underlines the role of social dialogue as a useful tool, contributing to better European governance by ensuring a better balance of interests through the involvement of all actors in decision-making and in the implementation process; stresses that 'all actors' must include those working in SMEs, as laid down in the SME Charter and agreed by the Lisbon Council; calls on the Commission to take initiatives to extend and enhance social dialogue at European level and, on the basis of the outcome, to continue to improve social standards without disregarding the need to preserve jobs.
Better regulation is one of the key-elements of the re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy which identified the need to boost economic growth and job creation.
Better regulation is one of the key-elements of the re-launch of the Lisbon Strategy which identified the need to boost economic growth and job creation.
Transparent high quality regulation not only serves the interests of industry, but also the European citizen.
Transparent high quality regulation not only serves the interests of industry, but also the European citizen.
The ultimate aim of the Better Regulation exercise should be to create more quality jobs.
The ultimate aim of the Better Regulation exercise should be to create more quality jobs.
The present Commission Communication on "Better regulation for growth and jobs" builds on the Commission's initiative "Action Plan on simplifying and improving the regulatory environment" as part of the EU White Paper on Governance (2002) and the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Lawmaking, agreed in December 2003 by the European Commission, European Parliament and the Council.
The present Commission Communication on "Better regulation for growth and jobs" builds on the Commission's initiative "Action Plan on simplifying and improving the regulatory environment" as part of the EU White Paper on Governance (2002) and the Inter-institutional Agreement on Better Lawmaking, agreed in December 2003 by the European Commission, European Parliament and the Council.
The Communication proposes three action lines:
The Communication proposes three action lines:
· further promoting the design and application of better regulation tools at the EU level, notably in so far as impact assessments and simplification are concerned,
· further promoting the design and application of better regulation tools at the EU level, notably in so far as impact assessments and simplification are concerned,
· working closely with the Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU by all regulators,
· working closely with the Member States to ensure that better regulation principles are applied consistently throughout the EU by all regulators,
· reinforcing the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national levels and with stakeholders.
· reinforcing the constructive dialogue between all regulators at the EU and national levels and with stakeholders.
Simplification of existing legislation
Simplification of existing legislation
Your draftsperson agrees with the Commission that efficacy and enforceability of legislation can be served by clear and simple drafting, on the condition that the quality remains high.
Your draftsperson agrees with the Commission that efficacy and enforceability of legislation can be served by clear and simple drafting, on the condition that the quality remains high.
However, he stresses that better regulation should not mean deregulation nor relaxing or dismantling of social standards.
However, he stresses that better regulation should not mean deregulation nor relaxing or dismantling of social standards.
In this same light, your draftsman also wishes to underline the importance of better implementation and enforcement of already existing social legislation.
In this same light, your draftsman also wishes to underline the importance of better implementation and enforcement of already existing social legislation.
The Commission states that it intends to strengthen the assessment of economic impacts of new legislation.
The Commission states that it intends to strengthen the assessment of economic impacts of new legislation.
This deepening of the economic pillar of the impact assessment should however not compromise the social elements duly being taken into account.
This deepening of the economic pillar of the impact assessment should however not compromise the social elements duly being taken into account.
Potential economic, social and environmental impacts of new legislation should be given equal weight.
Potential economic, social and environmental impacts of new legislation should be given equal weight.
Social dialogue
Social dialogue
Social dialogue ensures the involvement of relevant stakeholders, while at the same time contributes to a better balance of interests and to more practical resolutions.
Social dialogue ensures the involvement of relevant stakeholders, while at the same time contributes to a better balance of interests and to more practical resolutions.
It should be recognised as a valid tool of co-regulation, that could serve the better quality of regulation.
It should be recognised as a valid tool of co-regulation, that could serve the better quality of regulation.
Therefore, social dialogue should be reinforced both on the European and the national level.
Therefore, social dialogue should be reinforced both on the European and the national level.
Minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
Minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation
EMPL 8.9.2005
EMPL 8.9.2005
Ole Christensen 12.9.2005
Ole Christensen 12.9.2005
Jan Andersson, Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Zimmer
Jan Andersson, Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Roger Helmer, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jean Lambert, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Mario Mantovani, Ana Mato Adrover, Maria Matsouka, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, José Albino Silva Peneda, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Zimmer
Elspeth Attwooll, Edit Bauer, Mihael Brejc
Elspeth Attwooll, Edit Bauer, Mihael Brejc
Draftsman: Bert Doorn
Draftsman: Bert Doorn
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Budgetary Control, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
- the resolution on better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
- the resolution on better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0203 . , based on the Doorn report;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0203 . , based on the Doorn report;
- the resolution on the implementation, consequences and impact of the internal market legislation in force
- the resolution on the implementation, consequences and impact of the internal market legislation in force
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0204 . , based on the McCarthy report;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0204 . , based on the McCarthy report;
- the resolution on the Commission's 21st and 22nd Annual reports on monitoring the application of Community law (2003 and 2004)
- the resolution on the Commission's 21st and 22nd Annual reports on monitoring the application of Community law (2003 and 2004)
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0202 . , based on the Frassoni report;
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0202 . , based on the Frassoni report;
- the resolution on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
- the resolution on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0205 . , based on the Gargani report,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0205 . , based on the Gargani report,
Notes that the Mulder report on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation repeats the conclusions of the reports by Doorn, McCarthy, Frassoni and Gargani;
Notes that the Mulder report on minimising administrative costs imposed by legislation repeats the conclusions of the reports by Doorn, McCarthy, Frassoni and Gargani;
Insists that the Committee on Legal Affairs has primary responsibility for the better lawmaking agenda; welcomes, however, the aspects of the Mulder report which deal with the financial impact of European regulation on the budget of the European Union, particularly paragraphs 1, 9, 10, 12 and 13;
Insists that the Committee on Legal Affairs has primary responsibility for the better lawmaking agenda; welcomes, however, the aspects of the Mulder report which deal with the financial impact of European regulation on the budget of the European Union, particularly paragraphs 1, 9, 10, 12 and 13;
Bert Doorn 21.6.2006
Bert Doorn 21.6.2006
Maria Berger, Carlo Casini, Rosa Díez González, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Maria Berger, Carlo Casini, Rosa Díez González, Bert Doorn, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Nicola Zingaretti, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Kurt Lechner, Eva Lichtenberger, Manuel Medina Ortega, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard
Kurt Lechner, Eva Lichtenberger, Manuel Medina Ortega, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Michel Rocard