natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. whereas, in its draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the Constitutional Treaty), the Convention proposed that the Euratom Treaty should be separated from the legal structure of the future Constitution; whereas the Convention, in its work on the future of the European Union and the signing of the Constitutional Treaty, has maintained the provisions of the Euratom Treaty in their present state in the form of an annexed protocol,
E. whereas, in its draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the Constitutional Treaty), the Convention proposed that the Euratom Treaty should be separated from the legal structure of the future Constitution; whereas the Convention, in its work on the future of the European Union and the signing of the Constitutional Treaty, has maintained the provisions of the Euratom Treaty in their present state in the form of an annexed protocol,
F. whereas Parliament, in its resolution of 24 September 2003 entitled 'European Parliament resolution on the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the European Parliament's opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC)', welcomed this separation and urged the Intergovernmental Conference ‘to convene a Treaty revision conference in order to repeal the obsolete and outdated provisions of [the Euratom] Treaty, especially those relating to the promotion of nuclear energy and the lack of democratic decision-making procedures’
F. whereas Parliament, in its resolution of 24 September 2003 entitled 'European Parliament resolution on the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and the European Parliament's opinion on the convening of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC)', welcomed this separation and urged the Intergovernmental Conference ‘to convene a Treaty revision conference in order to repeal the obsolete and outdated provisions of [the Euratom] Treaty, especially those relating to the promotion of nuclear energy and the lack of democratic decision-making procedures’
OJ C 77 E, 26.3.2004, p.
OJ C 77 E, 26.3.2004, p.
255, paragraph 14. ,
255, paragraph 14. ,
G. whereas Germany, Ireland, Austria, Hungary and Sweden have annexed to the Constitutional Treaty a declaration noting that the core provisions of the Euratom Treaty need to be brought up to date and calling for a revision conference to be convened ‘as soon as possible’,
G. whereas Germany, Ireland, Austria, Hungary and Sweden have annexed to the Constitutional Treaty a declaration noting that the core provisions of the Euratom Treaty need to be brought up to date and calling for a revision conference to be convened ‘as soon as possible’,
H. whereas the Euratom Treaty introduced stringent safety standards for the handling of radioactive fuel elements and waste in the European Union, lays down uniform safety standards for protecting the health of workers and of the public as well as procedures for the implementation of those standards, and opposes any p roliferation of nuclear material for military purposes ,
H. whereas the Euratom Treaty introduced stringent safety standards for the handling of radioactive fuel elements and waste in the European Union, lays down uniform safety standards for protecting the health of workers and of the public as well as procedures for the implementation of those standards, and opposes any p roliferation of nuclear material for military purposes ,
Notes that expectations with regard to nuclear energy, to which the Euratom Treaty gave expression five decades ago, have changed; notes that those expectations now relate more to the need to have, in the form of the Euratom Treaty, a sound legal framework to govern the supervision of the use of nuclear energy in the European Union and to provide a framework for the integration into the European Union of countries which use nuclear power, through the transposition of the Euratom acquis communautaire; acknowledges that significant chapters in Title II of the Euratom Treaty have made it possible to protect the public, workers and the environment against ionising radiation (Chapter 3), to develop research in the areas of waste management and plant safety (Chapter 1) and to implement safeguards in respect of fissile materials in Europe (Chapter 7);
Notes that expectations with regard to nuclear energy, to which the Euratom Treaty gave expression five decades ago, have changed; notes that those expectations now relate more to the need to have, in the form of the Euratom Treaty, a sound legal framework to govern the supervision of the use of nuclear energy in the European Union and to provide a framework for the integration into the European Union of countries which use nuclear power, through the transposition of the Euratom acquis communautaire; acknowledges that significant chapters in Title II of the Euratom Treaty have made it possible to protect the public, workers and the environment against ionising radiation (Chapter 3), to develop research in the areas of waste management and plant safety (Chapter 1) and to implement safeguards in respect of fissile materials in Europe (Chapter 7);
Sees as evidence of an unacceptable democratic deficit the fact that Parliament is almost completely excluded from the Euratom legislative process and that it is consulted, and no more, on only one of the ten chapters of the Euratom Treaty;
Sees as evidence of an unacceptable democratic deficit the fact that Parliament is almost completely excluded from the Euratom legislative process and that it is consulted, and no more, on only one of the ten chapters of the Euratom Treaty;
Points out that, in spite of the promotional tone of its preamble, the Euratom Treaty does not require any Member State to develop the nuclear option on its own territory, thus respecting Member States’ sovereign right to develop their own energy mix;
Points out that, in spite of the promotional tone of its preamble, the Euratom Treaty does not require any Member State to develop the nuclear option on its own territory, thus respecting Member States’ sovereign right to develop their own energy mix;
Draws attention to the Treaty of Amsterdam of May 1999, which guarantees Parliament’s right of codecision; regrets that the extension of Parliament’s powers, and particularly their extension to include the powers of codecision in the majority of Community legislation procedures, has not been taken into account in the Euratom Treaty; considers that, despite the Treaty’s technical nature, Parliament should be formally involved in texts whose legal basis is the Euratom Treaty;
Draws attention to the Treaty of Amsterdam of May 1999, which guarantees Parliament’s right of codecision; regrets that the extension of Parliament’s powers, and particularly their extension to include the powers of codecision in the majority of Community legislation procedures, has not been taken into account in the Euratom Treaty; considers that, despite the Treaty’s technical nature, Parliament should be formally involved in texts whose legal basis is the Euratom Treaty;
Emphasises that the Euratom Treaty does not hinder the development of an internal electricity market and, is even less of an obstacle to the free movement of goods, persons and capital; points out, in that connection, that the ordinary law laid down by the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty) applies to nuclear activities and notes, by way of example, that movement of nuclear materials, equipment and technologies within and outside the European Union is covered by rules on the supervision of dual-use goods, adopted on the basis of the commercial policy laid down in the EC Treaty; adds that Euratom legislation is subject to competition law and regulations on State aid, as specified in Title VI of the EC Treaty; concludes, therefore, that the Euratom Treaty in no way represents a protectionist framework for nuclear energy;
Emphasises that the Euratom Treaty does not hinder the development of an internal electricity market and, is even less of an obstacle to the free movement of goods, persons and capital; points out, in that connection, that the ordinary law laid down by the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty) applies to nuclear activities and notes, by way of example, that movement of nuclear materials, equipment and technologies within and outside the European Union is covered by rules on the supervision of dual-use goods, adopted on the basis of the commercial policy laid down in the EC Treaty; adds that Euratom legislation is subject to competition law and regulations on State aid, as specified in Title VI of the EC Treaty; concludes, therefore, that the Euratom Treaty in no way represents a protectionist framework for nuclear energy;
Reiterates its call for an intergovernmental conference to be convened to carry out a comprehensive revision of the Euratom Treaty, to repeal the outdated provisions of that Treaty, to maintain the regulatory regime of the nuclear industry at EU level, to revise the remaining provisions in the light of a modern and sustainable energy policy and to incorporate them into the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in a separate energy chapter;
Reiterates its call for an intergovernmental conference to be convened to carry out a comprehensive revision of the Euratom Treaty, to repeal the outdated provisions of that Treaty, to maintain the regulatory regime of the nuclear industry at EU level, to revise the remaining provisions in the light of a modern and sustainable energy policy and to incorporate them into the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in a separate energy chapter;
Considers that, irrespective of the diversity of views on nuclear energy, the provisions of the Euratom Treaty that have helped avoid proliferation of nuclear materials, and those which address health, safety and prevention of radiological contamination, have been highly beneficial and should be carefully co-ordinated with the health and safety provisions of the EC Treaty.
Considers that, irrespective of the diversity of views on nuclear energy, the provisions of the Euratom Treaty that have helped avoid proliferation of nuclear materials, and those which address health, safety and prevention of radiological contamination, have been highly beneficial and should be carefully co-ordinated with the health and safety provisions of the EC Treaty.
Assessing Euratom – 50 years of European nuclear energy policy
Assessing Euratom – 50 years of European nuclear energy policy
AFCO 12.10.2006
AFCO 12.10.2006
Johannes Voggenhuber 4.10.2006
Johannes Voggenhuber 4.10.2006
Philip Dimitrov Dimitrov, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Bronisław Geremek, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Johannes Voggenhuber
Philip Dimitrov Dimitrov, Andrew Duff, Maria da Assunção Esteves, Bronisław Geremek, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Jo Leinen, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Rihards Pīks, Johannes Voggenhuber
Pervenche Berès, Georgi Bliznashki, Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Gérard Onesta, Georgios Papastamkos, Bogdan Pęk, György Schöpflin, Alexander Stubb
Pervenche Berès, Georgi Bliznashki, Elmar Brok, Carlos Carnero González, Gérard Onesta, Georgios Papastamkos, Bogdan Pęk, György Schöpflin, Alexander Stubb
Assessing Euratom - 50 years of European nuclear energy policy
Assessing Euratom - 50 years of European nuclear energy policy
Eugenijus Maldeikis 12.9.2006
Eugenijus Maldeikis 12.9.2006
John Attard-Montalto, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Giles Chichester, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Ján Hudacký, Mary Honeyball, Anne Laperrouze, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Radu Ţîrle, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
John Attard-Montalto, Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Giles Chichester, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Ján Hudacký, Mary Honeyball, Anne Laperrouze, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Radu Ţîrle, Patrizia Toia, Catherine Trautmann, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Alexander Alvaro, Konstantin Dimitrov, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Satu Hassi, Edit Herczog, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Esko Seppänen, Hannes Swoboda, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Alexander Alvaro, Konstantin Dimitrov, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Satu Hassi, Edit Herczog, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Esko Seppänen, Hannes Swoboda, Lambert van Nistelrooij
относно годишния доклад на Съвета до Европейския парламент за главните аспекти и основните решения в областта на общата външна политика и политиката на сигурност, включително и финансовите последици върху бюджета на Европейските общности (точка З, параграф 40 от Междуинституционалното споразумение от 6 май 1999 г.) – 2005 г.
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005
PE 382.414v04-00
PE 382.414v04-00
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................18
относно годишния доклад на Съвета до Европейския парламент за главните аспекти и основните решения в областта на общата външна политика и политиката на сигурност, включително и финансовите последици върху бюджета на Европейските общности (точка З, параграф 40 от Междуинституционалното споразумение от 6 май 1999 г.) – 2005 г. ( 2006/2217(INI) )
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP, including the financial implications for the general budget of the European Communities (point H, paragraph 40, of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) - 2005 ( 2006/2217(INI) )
– като взе предвид годишния доклад на Съвета (10314/1/2006),
– having regard to the annual report from the Council (10314/1/2006),
– като взе предвид член 21 от Договора за създаване на Европейския съюз,
– having regard to Article 21 of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Конституция за Европа, подписан на 29 октомври 2004 г. в Рим,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed in Rome on 29 October 2004,
– като взе предвид Европейската стратегия за сигурност, приета от Европейския съвет на 12 декември 2003 г.,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– като взе предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 6 май 1999 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и подобряването на бюджетната процедура
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure
– като взе предвид решението си от 17 май 2006 г. относно сключването на Междуинституционално споразумение за бюджетната дисциплина и разумното финансово управление
– having regard to its decision of 17 May 2006 on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
– като взе предвид заключенията на председателството от заседанието на Европейския съвет, проведено в Брюксел на 16-17 юни 2005 г., и по-специално декларацията му за ратифициране на Договора за създаване на Конституция за Европа, както и заключенията на председателството от Европейските съвети от 15-16 юни и 14-15 декември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 16-17 June 2005 and in particular to its declaration on ratification of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, as well as to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Councils of 15-16 June and 14-15 December 2006,
– като взе предвид заключенията на председателството от Европейския съвет, проведен на 15-16 декември 2005 г. в Брюксел, относно финансовите перспективи за периода 2007-2013 г.,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 15-16 December 2005 on the Financial Perspective 2007-2013,
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 12 януари 2005 г. относно Договора за създаване на Конституция за Европа
– having regard to its resolution of 12 January 2005 on the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 2 февруари 2006 г. относно общата външна политика и политиката на сигурност 2004 г.
– having regard to its resolution of 2 February 2006 on the Common Foreign and Security Policy – 2004
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 16 ноември 2006 г. относно изпълнението на Европейската стратегия за сигурност в контекста на европейската политика за сигурност и отбрана
– having regard to its resolution of 16 November 2006 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy in the context of the ESDP
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2006)0495 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0495 . ,
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 14 юни 2006 г. относно следващите действия, които да се предприемат по отношение на периода на размисъл и анализ на бъдещето на Европа
– having regard to its resolution of 14 June 2006 on the next steps for the period of reflection and analysis on the Future of Europe
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2006)0263 . и за резултатите от съвместното парламентарно заседание за бъдещето на Европа: От размисъл към действие, проведено на 4-5 декември 2006 г. в Брюксел,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0263 . and to the results of the Joint Parliamentary Meeting on the Future of Europe: From Reflection to Action, held on 4-5 December 2006 in Brussels,
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 16 февруари 2006 г. относно новите финансови инструменти за развитие във връзка с Целите на хилядолетието
– having regard to its resolution of 16 February 2006 on new financial instruments for development in connection with the Millennium Goals
– като взе предвид резолюциите си от 15 юни и 13 декември 2006 г. относно срещите на високо равнище ЕС-Русия
– having regard to its resolutions of 15 June and 13 December 2006 on the EU-Russia Summits
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2006)0270 и P6_TA(2006)0566 . ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0270 and P6_TA(2006)0566 . ,
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 1 юни 2006 г. за подобряване на отношенията между ЕС и САЩ в рамките на Споразумението за трансатлантическо партньорство и за трансатлантическите отношения между ЕС и САЩ в областта на икономиката
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on improving EU-US relations in the framework of a Transatlantic Partnership Agreement and on EU-US transatlantic economic relations
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2006)0238 и P6_TA(2006)0239 . ,
OJ C 298 E, 8.12.2006, pp. 226 and 235. ,
– като взе предвид резолюциите си от 23 октомври 2003 г. относно мира и достойнството в Близкия изток и от 7 септември 2006 г. относно ситуацията в Близкия изток
– having regard to its resolutions of 23 October 2003 on peace and dignity in the Middle East and of 7 September 2006 on the situation in the Middle East
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 7 септември 2006 г. относно отношенията между ЕС и Китай
– having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2006 on EU-China Relations
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2006)0346 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0346 . ,
– като взе предвид заключенията на председателството на Европейския съвет от 15 и 16 декември 2005 г. „Европейският съюз и Африка: към стратегическо партньорство“,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 15 and 16 December 2005 on "The EU and Africa: Towards a Strategic Partnership",
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 10 март 2005 г относно преразглеждането на Договора за неразпространение на ядрените оръжия в Северна Корея и Иран
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2005 on the review of the Non-Proliferation Treaty - Nuclear arms in North Korea and Iran
– като взе предвид резолюцията си от 23 март 2006 г. относно сигурността на енергийните доставки в ЕС
– having regard to its resolution of 23 March 2006 on security of energy supply in the European Union
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 13 декември 2006 г. относно институционалните аспекти на възможностите на Европейския съюз да интегрира нови държави-членки
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2006 on the institutional aspects of the European Union's capacity to integrate new Member States
Приети текстове, ( P6_TA-PROV(2006)0569 ). ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0569 . ,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 13 декември 2006 г. относно стратегията за разширяване и основните предизвикателства за 2006-2007 г .
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2006 on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2006-2007
Приети текстове, ( P6_TA-PROV(2006)0568 ). ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0568 . ,
– като взе предвид член 112, параграф 1 от правилника,
– having regard to Rule 112(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по външни работи и становището на комисията по бюджети (A6-/2007),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0130/2007 ),
A. като има предвид, че в очакване на това, че последващият подход на Съвета само да предава списък с описание на извършените през предходната година дейности в областта на общата външна политика и политиката на сигурност, без преди това да проведе консултации с Парламента, както е предвидено в член 21 от Договора за създаване на Европейски съюз, отсега нататък следва да се промени, като се използва конструктивно тълкуване на членове 42 и 43 от новото Междуинституционално споразумение за бюджетната дисциплина и разумното финансово управление от 17 май 2006 г.
A. expecting that the Council's a posteriori approach of merely submitting a descriptive list of Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) activities carried out in the previous year instead of consulting Parliament beforehand as provided for in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union will henceforth be corrected by means of a constructive interpretation of Points 42 and 43 of the new Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management of 17 May 2006
Б. като има предвид, че Съветът трябва веднъж завинаги да замени тази практика с реално провеждане на консултации с Парламента, за да се гарантира, че становищата на Парламента оказват реално въздействие върху решенията, които ще се вземат през следващата година,
B. whereas the Council should once and for all replace that practice with a genuine consultation of Parliament so as to ensure that Parliament's views have a real impact on the choices made for the following year,
В. като има предвид, че след петото разширяване на ЕС, 18 държави-членки са ратифицирали Договора за конституция, но трябва да се работи за окончателната ратификация и влизането в сила на Договора за конституция за Европа, за да се гарантира, че Съюзът е готов да се изправи пред всички глобални отговорности, заплахи и предизвикателства на съвременния свят,
C. whereas, following the fifth enlargement of the EU, 18 Member States have ratified the Constitutional Treaty but the full ratification and entry into force of the Treaty needs to be pursued in order to ensure that the Union is ready to face up to the global responsibilities, threats and challenges of today's world,