natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Държавите-членки посочват отделно в обобщения доклад, предвиден в първата алинея от параграф 3, сумите, които не са върнати в сроковете, определени в първата алинея от настоящия параграф.
Member States shall indicate separately in the summary report referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 the amounts not recovered within the time-limits specified in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.
В случаите, в които в рамките на процедурата по връщане на сумите се установи с окончателен характер посредством административен или правен инструмент липсата на каквито и да е нередности, съответната държава-членка декларира като разход пред ЕФГЗ финансовата тежест , поета от нея по силата на първата алинея.
Where, in the context of the recovery procedure, the absence of any irregularity is recorded by an administrative or legal instrument of a definitive nature, the Member State concerned shall declare as expenditure to the EAGF the financial burden borne by it under the first subparagraph.
7а) В член 33, параграф 8, алинея първа се заменя, както следва:
(7a) In Article 33, paragraph 8, the first subparagraph shall be replaced by the following:
Ако подлежащата на връщане сума не е върната преди закриването на определена програма за развитие на селските райони, финансовите последици от невръщането се понасят от съответната държава-членка и се вземат под внимание или в края на четиригодишния срок от първоначалното заключение по административен или съдебен път, или на осемгодишния срок в случаите, в които са предприети действия за връщане на сумата чрез националните съдилища, или при закриването на програмата, ако тези срокове изтичат преди закриването ѝ.“
If recovery has not taken place prior to the closure of a rural development programme, the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned and shall be taken into account either at the end of the period of four years following the first administrative or judicial finding or eight years where recovery action is taken in the national courts, or on the closure of the programme if those deadlines expire prior to such closure."
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 9 A (нова) Член 43 a (нов) (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 9 A (new) Article 43 a (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
9а) Добавя се член 43а, както следва:
(9a) The following Article 43 a is inserted:
През периода 2008-2009 г. Комисията изготвя доклад за оценка, който евентуално се придружава от законодателни предложения * .
In 2008-2009 the Commission shall draw up an evaluation report, possibly accompanied by legislative proposals*.
През 2011 г. Комисията изготвя доклад за оценка, който евентуално се придружава от законодателни предложения и в който се разглеждат по-специално обективното разделяне на фондовете за земеделието и за развитие на селските райони въз основа на обективни критерии, а не на досегашните разходи и взаимни отстъпки в рамките на Съвета.
In 2011 the Commission shall draw up an evaluation report, possibly accompanied by legislative proposals, considering, in particular, the objective distribution of agricultural and rural development funds, on the basis of objective criteria rather than taking as its starting point historical expenditure and compromises in the Council.
A division based on more objective criteria is also in line with the budgetary principles of universality and equilibrium.
It is sufficient now to call for objective criteria, to be determined later during the debate on the CAP.
Финансиране на Общата селскостопанска политика
Financing of the common agricultural policy
Jean-Pierre Audy, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Esther De Lange, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Dan Jørgensen, Bogusław Liberadzki, Nils Lundgren, Jan Mulder, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Alexander Stubb, Kyösti Virrankoski
Jean-Pierre Audy, Herbert Bösch, Mogens N.J. Camre, Paulo Casaca, Esther De Lange, Christofer Fjellner, Ingeborg Gräßle, Dan Jørgensen, Bogusław Liberadzki, Nils Lundgren, Jan Mulder, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Bart Staes, Alexander Stubb, Kyösti Virrankoski
Edit Herczog, Monica Maria Iacob-Ridzi, Pierre Pribetich, Petya Stavreva
Edit Herczog, Monica Maria Iacob-Ridzi, Pierre Pribetich, Petya Stavreva
Katerina Batzeli, Ioannis Gklavakis
Katerina Batzeli, Ioannis Gklavakis
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS ON FINANCIAL COMPATIBILITY
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETS ON FINANCIAL COMPATIBILITY
Mr Neil Parish
Mr Neil Parish
Subject: Opinion in form of a letter to Commission proposal on Financing of the CAP
Subject: Opinion in form of a letter to Commission proposal on Financing of the CAP
Dear colleague,
Dear colleague,
The committee on Budgets can support the approach of the European Commission leaving the publication of the relevant data at Member State level: Pursuant to Article 53 b , paragraph 2, lit. d of the Financial Regulation
The committee on Budgets can support the approach of the European Commission leaving the publication of the relevant data at Member State level: Pursuant to Article 53b, paragraph 2, lit. d of the Financial Regulation
Financial Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 of 22 June 2002 as modified by Council regulation 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 , Member States shall ensure annual ex-post publication of the beneficiaries of the EAGF and the EAFRD and the amounts received per beneficiary under each of these Funds (Article 44a of the proposal).
Financial Regulation (EC) No 1605/2002 of 22 June 2002 as modified by Council regulation 1995/2006 of 13 December 2006 , Member States shall ensure annual ex-post publication of the beneficiaries of the EAGF and the EAFRD and the amounts received per beneficiary under each of these Funds (Article 44a of the proposal).
However, it is not clear how a uniform level of information provided by the 27 Member States shall be ensured.
However, it is not clear how a uniform level of information provided by the 27 Member States shall be ensured.
Although the proposal provides that "the publication shall contain for the EAGF at least the amount subdivided in direct payments within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and other expenditure and for the EAFRD the total amount of public funding per beneficiary", there is a danger that these provisions being implemented with a different degree of detail in each Member State.
Although the proposal provides that "the publication shall contain for the EAGF at least the amount subdivided in direct payments within the meaning of Article 2(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and other expenditure and for the EAFRD the total amount of public funding per beneficiary", there is a danger that these provisions being implemented with a different degree of detail in each Member State.
Once in force, the proposed regulation would be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, according to Article 249 TEC.
Once in force, the proposed regulation would be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, according to Article 249 TEC.
But Community acts have to be sufficiently clear and precise in order to have direct effect.
But Community acts have to be sufficiently clear and precise in order to have direct effect.
Judgment of the Court of 24 October 1973, Carl Schlüter v Hauptzollamt Lörrach, C-9/73, point 6 It appears that the provision foreseen in Article 44a (new) is not fulfilling this legal requirement as it is in itself not clear and sufficiently precise and leaves a margin of discretion to the authorities (of the Member State) by whom it is to be applied.
Judgment of the Court of 24 October 1973, Carl Schlüter v Hauptzollamt Lörrach, C-9/73, point 6 It appears that the provision foreseen in Article 44a (new) is not fulfilling this legal requirement as it is in itself not clear and sufficiently precise and leaves a margin of discretion to the authorities (of the Member State) by whom it is to be applied.
For example, the proposed wording of Article 44a leaves it open if the Member State has to publish also the first name, or only the surname, or in case, also the firm of a company (or legal entity formally receiving the grant).
For example, the proposed wording of Article 44a leaves it open if the Member State has to publish also the first name, or only the surname, or in case, also the firm of a company (or legal entity formally receiving the grant).
In the opinion of the committee on Budgets it is not clear if the provision "the publication shall contain at least" gives a too large margin of discretion to the authorities of the Member State to publish also the community and /or place of residence of the beneficiary, e.g.
In the opinion of the committee on Budgets it is not clear if the provision "the publication shall contain at least" gives a too large margin of discretion to the authorities of the Member State to publish also the community and /or place of residence of the beneficiary, e.g.
Another concern is how the data to be published will be comparable and easily accessible?
Another concern is how the data to be published will be comparable and easily accessible?
During the negotiations on the last reform of the Financial Regulation, the Commission was opposing to take any legal responsibility of the content of the data received from the Member States.
During the negotiations on the last reform of the Financial Regulation, the Commission was opposing to take any legal responsibility of the content of the data received from the Member States.
On the other hand it should be feasible for the European Commission, DG AGRI, to offer to the public an overview of the location where to find the relevant data under the form of a "link list", whilst declining in a legal disclaimer responsibility for the contents of the websites which remain under the sole responsibility of the competent Member States authorities.
On the other hand it should be feasible for the European Commission, DG AGRI, to offer to the public an overview of the location where to find the relevant data under the form of a "link list", whilst declining in a legal disclaimer responsibility for the contents of the websites which remain under the sole responsibility of the competent Member States authorities.
This would render the information accessible in practice whilst making clear for every interested party that the data is collected by the Member State and not by the Commission.
This would render the information accessible in practice whilst making clear for every interested party that the data is collected by the Member State and not by the Commission.
Finally, the committee on Budgets is of the opinion that it is unacceptable that the detailed rules as to the obligation of the Member States to publish information on beneficiaries laid down in Article 44a, including aspects related to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data should be adopted by the Commission by a comitology procedure provided for in Article 41(2).
Finally, the committee on Budgets is of the opinion that it is unacceptable that the detailed rules as to the obligation of the Member States to publish information on beneficiaries laid down in Article 44a, including aspects related to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data should be adopted by the Commission by a comitology procedure provided for in Article 41(2).
It is clear that the question which data are going to be published is the very core of the purpose of the proposed piece of legislation.
It is clear that the question which data are going to be published is the very core of the purpose of the proposed piece of legislation.
It can therefore not be accepted that the Commission proposes a quite vague formulation of the transparency requirements at this stage (adoption by Council with consultation of the European Parliament) and will regulate all relevant details at a later stage, when adopting itself the implementing rules (Commission regulation without EP scrutiny).
It can therefore not be accepted that the Commission proposes a quite vague formulation of the transparency requirements at this stage (adoption by Council with consultation of the European Parliament) and will regulate all relevant details at a later stage, when adopting itself the implementing rules (Commission regulation without EP scrutiny).
Vincenzo Aita, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Duarte Freitas, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Lily Jacobs, Elisabeth Jeggle, Atilla Béla Ladislau Kelemen, Stéphane Le Foll, Véronique Mathieu, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Petya Stavreva, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski
Vincenzo Aita, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Joseph Daul, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Duarte Freitas, Lutz Goepel, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Lily Jacobs, Elisabeth Jeggle, Atilla Béla Ladislau Kelemen, Stéphane Le Foll, Véronique Mathieu, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Petya Stavreva, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Janusz Wojciechowski
Esther De Lange, Ilda Figueiredo, Roselyne Lefrançois, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Mayer
Esther De Lange, Ilda Figueiredo, Roselyne Lefrançois, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Mayer
относно програмата за политиката в областта на законната имиграция
on the Policy Plan on Legal Migration
PE 380.871v02-00
PE 380.871v02-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по права на жените и равенство на половете Error!
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...26
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията относно програмата за политиката в областта на законната имиграция ( COM(2005)0669 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on the Policy Plan on Legal Migration ( COM(2005)0669 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията относно политическите приоритети в рамките на борбата срещу незаконната имиграция на граждани от трети страни ( COM(2006)0402 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on policy priorities in the fight against the illegal immigration of third-country nationals ( COM(2006)0402 ),
– като взе предвид становището на Комитета на регионите от 26 февруари 2007 г., озаглавено „Програма за политиката в областта на законната имиграция, борбата срещу незаконната имиграция, бъдещето на Европейската мрежа за миграцията” (КР 233/2006),
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 26 February 2007 entitled 'Policy plan on legal migration, fight against legal immigration, future of the European migration network' (CdR 233/2006),
– като взе предвид заключенията от председателството на Европейския съвет от 4 и 5 ноември 2004 г. и включената в тях Хагска програма
– having regard to conclusions of the European Council presidency of 4-5 November 2004 and the Hague Programme included therein
Заключения на Европейския съвет, Приложение I, точка III. ,
European Council conclusions, Annex I, point III. ,
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета и Европейския парламент, озаглавено „Глобалният подход към миграцията една година по-късно: към цялостна европейска миграционна политика“ ( COM(2006)0735 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled 'The global approach to migration one year on: towards a comprehensive European migration policy' ( COM(2006)0735 ),
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 9 юни 2005 г.относно връзките между законната и незаконната миграция и интеграцията на мигрантите
– having regard to its resolution of 9 June 2005 on the links between legal and illegal migration and integration of migrants
– като взе предвид Зелената книга за подход на ЕС към управлението на икономическата миграция ( COM(2004)0811 ) и своята резолюция по този въпрос от 26 октомври 2005 г.
– having regard to the Green Paper on an EU approach to managing economic migration ( COM(2004)0811 ) and its resolution of 26 October 2005 on that topic
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент, Европейския икономически и социален комитет и Комитета на регионите - „Обща програма за интеграция - рамка за интегрирането на гражданите на трети страни в Европейския съюз“ ( COM(2005)0389 ), както и своята резолюция от 6 юли 2006 г . относно стратегиите и средствата за интегриране на имигрантите в Европейския съюз
– having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions - A Common Agenda for Integration - Framework for the Integration of Third-Country Nationals in the European Union ( COM(2005)0389 ), and its resolution of 6 July 2006 on strategies and means for the integration of immigrants in the European Union
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2006)0318 . ,
Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0318 . ,
– като взе предвид Регламент (ЕО) № 862/2007 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 11 юли 2007 година относно статистиката на Общността за миграцията и международната закрила
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection
– като взе предвид резултата от конференцията на министрите ЕС-Африка относно миграцията и развитието, която се проведе в Рабат на 10 и 11 юли 2006 г.,
– having regard to the outcome of the EU-Africa ministerial conference on migration and development, which was held in Rabat on 10 and 11 July 2006,
– като взе предвид съвместната декларация на Африка и ЕС относно миграцията и развитието, приета по време на конференцията на министрите ЕС-Африка, която се проведе в Триполи на 22 и 23 ноември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the EU-Africa joint declaration on migration and development which was adopted at the EU-Africa ministerial conference held in Tripoli on 22 and 23 November 2006,
– като взе предвид цялостния подход, потвърден в заключенията на председателството след Европейския съвет в Брюксел от 14 и 15 декември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the comprehensive approach as reaffirmed in the presidency conclusions following the 14-15 December 2006 Brussels European Council,
– като взе предвид доклада на Съвместната парламентарна асамблея АКТБ-ЕС относно миграцията на квалифицираните работници и нейните последици за националното развитие, приет на 28 юни 2007 г.;
– having regard to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly's report on migration of skilled workers and its effect thereof upon national development, which was adopted on 28 June 2007,
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Европейския парламент, Съвета, Европейския икономически и социален комитет и Комитета на регионите, озаглавен „Прилагане на Глобалния подход към миграцията за източните и югоизточни региони, съседни на Европейския съюз” ( COM(2007)0247 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'Applying the global approach to migration to the eastern and south-eastern regions neighbouring the European Union' ( COM(2007)0247 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Европейския парламент, Съвета, Европейския икономически и социален комитет и Комитета на регионите относно циркулярната миграция и партньорствата за мобилност между Европейския съюз и трети държави ( COM(2007)0248 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on circular migration and mobility partnerships between the European Union and third countries ( COM(2007)0248 ),
– като взе предвид предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и Съвета за прилагане на санкции срещу работодатели на незаконно пребиваващи граждани на трета държава ( COM(2007)0249 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for sanctions against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals ( COM(2007)0249 - C6-0143/2007 - 2007/0094(COD) ),
– като взе предвид Амстердамския договор, с който на Общността се възлагат правомощия и отговорности в областта на имиграцията и убежището, и член 63 от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to the Amsterdam Treaty (pursuant to which powers and responsibilities in the immigration and asylum fields are conferred upon the Community) and Article 63 of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи и становищата на комисията по развитие, комисията по култура и образование и комисията по правата на жените и равенството на половете ( A6-0322/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Culture and Education and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0322/2007 ),
А. като има предвид, че според Евростат броят на гражданите от трети държави, които пребивават законно в 27-те държави-членки на Европейския съюз, е приблизително 18,5 милиона души (докато близо 9 милиона граждани на ЕС пребивават в държава-членка, различна от тяхната);
A. whereas according to Eurostat the number of third-country nationals legally resident in the 27 EU Member States is approximately 18.5 million (whilst nearly 9 million EU citizens are resident in a Member State other than their own),
Б. като има предвид, че миграцията е международно явление, в което участват като мигранти и самите граждани на ЕС,
B. whereas migration is an international phenomenon in which EU citizens also take part as migrants themselves,
В. като има предвид, че в рамките както на настоящите договори, така и на проекта за нов договор държавите-членки са тези, които de jure и de facto определят броя на икономическите мигранти, допускани в Съюза с цел работа,
C. whereas pursuant both to the existing treaties and to the draft new treaty, the Member States are responsible both de jure and de facto for setting the number of economic migrants allowed into the EU for work purposes,
Г. като има предвид, че е необходим цялостен и последователен подход към имиграцията на европейско равнище; тъй като всяка една промяна на имиграционната политика в една от държавите-членки оказва влияние върху миграционния поток и развитието на събитията в други държави-членки,
D. whereas a comprehensive and consistent approach to immigration is required at European level, since a change to immigration policy in one Member State influences migrant flows and developments in other Member States,
Д. като има предвид, че действителността, свързана със застаряването на населението и демографските промени изискват преосмисляне на политиките в областта на имиграцията, тъй като настоящото състояние и развитието в бъдеще на трудовите пазари в ЕС могат като цяло да бъдат характеризирани като нуждаещи се от добре управлявана законна имиграция (според Евростат населението в трудоспособна възраст като част от населението като цяло ще намалее с над 50 милиона до 2050 г.),
E. whereas the reality of ageing and demographic changes necessitate rethinking immigration policies since the current and future situations of the EU labour markets can be broadly described as in demand of well-managed legal immigration (according to Eurostat the working-age population within the population as a whole will shrink by over 50 million by 2050),
Е. като има предвид, че мандатът на Междуправителствената конференция, както бе определен през м. юни 2007 г. от Европейския съвет, предвижда процедурата на Общността да бъде разширена, така че да обхване всички въпроси, свързани със законната имиграция, като по този начин се премахнат несъответствията и се подобри ефективността на вземането на решения,
F. whereas the mandate for the IGC as defined by the June 2007 European Council foresees the extension of the Community procedure to all matters concerning legal immigration, thus eliminating a disparity and improving effectiveness of decision making,