natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The term 'commercial scale' is central to the definition of the offence, and needs to be precisely defined.
The term 'commercial scale' is central to the definition of the offence, and needs to be precisely defined.
It must include not only acts that have an economic or commercial intention, but also serious acts of piracy on a large scale, that is, for more than individual or personal use, which may have no economic advantage for the offender but which may cause very substantial harm to the right-holder .
It must include not only acts that have an economic or commercial intention, but also serious acts of piracy on a large scale, that is, for more than individual or personal use, which may have no economic advantage for the offender but which may cause very substantial harm to the right-holder .
Member States shall ensure the treatment as criminal offences, when committed on a commercial scale, of all intentional trade mark infringements consisting of the use of a sign which is identical to the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical to those for which the trade mark is registered.
Member States shall ensure the treatment as criminal offences, when committed on a commercial scale, of all intentional trade mark infringements consisting of the use of a sign which is identical to the trade mark in relation to goods or services which are identical to those for which the trade mark is registered.
It is convenient to define separately copyright and trademark infringements
It is convenient to define separately copyright and trademark infringements
Article 4, paragraph 2
Article 4, paragraph 2
For the offences referred to in Article 3, the Member States shall also provide , in appropriate cases , for the necessary measures to ensure that a natural or legal person held liable is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, such as:
For the offences referred to in Article 3, the Member States shall also provide , in appropriate cases , for the necessary measures to ensure that a natural or legal person held liable is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, such as:
(a) exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid;
(a) exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid;
(b) total or partial closure, on a permanent or temporary basis, of the establishment used primarily to commit the offence;
(b) total or partial closure, on a permanent or temporary basis, of the establishment used primarily to commit the offence;
(b) temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities;
(b) temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities;
(c) a permanent or temporary ban on engaging in commercial activities;
(c) a permanent or temporary ban on engaging in commercial activities;
(c) placing under judicial supervision;
(c) placing under judicial supervision;
(d) placing under judicial supervision;
(d) placing under judicial supervision;
(d) a judicial winding-up order;
(d) a judicial winding-up order;
(e) judicial winding-up;
(e) judicial winding-up;
(e) temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence;
(e) temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence;
(f) a ban on access to public assistance or subsidies;
(f) a ban on access to public assistance or subsidies;
(f) publication of judicial decisions;
(f) publication of judicial decisions;
(g) publication of judicial decisions.
(g) publication of judicial decisions.
(g) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right.
(g) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right.
See justification relating to first amendment.
See justification relating to first amendment.
Furthermore, the substance and wording of the relevant list of penalties should not be 'reinvented' in the case of every legislative text.
Furthermore, the substance and wording of the relevant list of penalties should not be 'reinvented' in the case of every legislative text.
The penalties proposed under (a) to (e) have therefore been taken from the Council's proposed text for a Council framework decision on the fight against organised crime, 8496/1/06 (2005/003(CNS)), and supplemented by specific proposals in the original text relating to the current matter.
The penalties proposed under (a) to (e) have therefore been taken from the Council's proposed text for a Council framework decision on the fight against organised crime, 8496/1/06 (2005/003(CNS)), and supplemented by specific proposals in the original text relating to the current matter.
(a) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right and, in appropriate cases, seizure or destruction of the materials or elements principally used for the creation or manufacture of those goods ;
(a) destruction of the goods infringing an intellectual property right and, in appropriate cases, seizure or destruction of the materials or elements principally used for the creation or manufacture of those goods ;
In the cases provided for in Article 5 of this Directive , the Member States shall take the necessary measures to allow the total or partial confiscation of goods belonging to convicted natural or legal persons in accordance with Article 3 of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property.
In the cases provided for in Article 5 of this Directive , the Member States shall take the necessary measures to allow the total or partial confiscation of goods belonging to convicted natural or legal persons in accordance with Article 3 of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property.
These extended confiscation powers should refer to the same infringements and offences to which the directive applies .
These extended confiscation powers should refer to the same infringements and offences to which the directive applies .
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6 a (new)
Article 6a
Article 6a
Misuse of powers
Misuse of powers
Member States shall ensure that through criminal, civil and procedural measures, the misuse of threats of criminal sanctions can be prohibited and subject to penalties.
Member States shall ensure that through criminal, civil and procedural measures, the misuse of threats of criminal sanctions can be prohibited and subject to penalties.
Member States shall prohibit procedural misuse, especially as criminal measures are employed for the enforcement of the requirements of civil law.
Member States shall prohibit procedural misuse, especially as criminal measures are employed for the enforcement of the requirements of civil law.
Article 6 b (new)
Article 6 b (new)
Article 6b
Article 6b
Member States shall ensure that the rights of defendants shall be duly protected and guaranteed.
Member States shall ensure that the rights of defendants shall be duly protected and guaranteed.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts, are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams into the offences referred to in Article 3.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts, are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams into the offences referred to in Article 3.
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8 a (new)
Article 8a
Article 8a
Protection of personal data
Protection of personal data
1 OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
1 OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
The amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
The amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Ewa Klamt, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Sarah Ludford, Edith Mastenbroek, Hartmut Nassauer, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Johannes Blokland, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Adeline Hazan, Ewa Klamt, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Sarah Ludford, Edith Mastenbroek, Hartmut Nassauer, Martine Roure, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Manfred Weber, Stefano Zappalà, Tatjana Ždanoka
Richard Corbett, Panayiotis Demetriou, Camiel Eurlings, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Sophia in 't Veld, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Bill Newton Dunn, Hubert Pirker, Marie-Line Reynaud, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Rainer Wieland
Richard Corbett, Panayiotis Demetriou, Camiel Eurlings, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Sophia in 't Veld, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Bill Newton Dunn, Hubert Pirker, Marie-Line Reynaud, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Rainer Wieland
Criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
Carlo Casini, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Carlo Casini, Marek Aleksander Czarnecki, Cristian Dumitrescu, Monica Frassoni, Giuseppe Gargani, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Katalin Lévai, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Mogens N.J. Camre, Janelly Fourtou, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Eva Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Michel Rocard, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Nicola Zingaretti
Mogens N.J. Camre, Janelly Fourtou, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Eva Lichtenberger, Arlene McCarthy, Michel Rocard, Gabriele Stauner, József Szájer, Jacques Toubon, Nicola Zingaretti
Toine Manders, Umberto Guidoni
Toine Manders, Umberto Guidoni
по предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно определени аспекти на медиацията по гражданско-правни и търговско-правни спорове
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
PE 374.428v04-00
PE 374.428v04-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................25
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 27
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 24
за предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно определени аспекти на медиацията по гражданско-правни и търговско-правни спорове
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2004)0718 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0718 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и членове 61, буква в) и 67, параграф 5 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0154/2004 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0154/2004 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по правни въпроси и становището на комисия по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0074/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0074/2007 ),
2) На срещата в Тампере на 15 и 16 октомври 1999 г. Европейският съвет призова държавите-членки да създадат алтернативни, извънсъдебни процедури във връзка с по-добър достъп до правосъдие в Европа .
(2) The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 called for, in relation to better access to justice in Europe, for alternative, extra-judicial procedures to be created by Member States.
2) Принципът на достъп до правосъдие е основен и на срещата в Тампере на 15 и 16 октомври 1999 г. Европейският съвет призова държавите-членки да създадат алтернативни, извънсъдебни процедури с оглед осигуряване на по-добър достъп до правосъдие .
(2) The principle of access to justice is fundamental and, with a view to securing better access to justice, the European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 called for alternative, extra-judicial procedures to be created by the Member States.
Съображение 5 а (ново)
Recital 5 a (new)
5а) Настоящата директива се прилага и за медиация на потребителски спорове.
(5a) This Directive also applies to consumer mediation.
Следователно, особеностите на медиацията на потребителски спорове следва да бъдат взети предвид.
Therefore the particularities of consumer mediation should be taken into account.
По-специално, тя следва да съдържа принципите, определени в Препоръка на Комисията 2001/310/EО от 4 април 2001 г. относно принципите за извънсъдебните органи, участващи в разрешаването на потребителски спорове по взаимно съгласие 1 .
In particular, it should incorporate the principles set out in Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC of 4 April 2001 on the principles for out-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of consumer disputes 1 .
The current legislation on consumer mediation consists of two Commission recommendations setting out a number of principles which out-of-court bodies involved in consumer ADR should comply with (Recommendation 1998/257 and Recommendation 2001/310).
The current legislation on consumer mediation consists of two Commission recommendations setting out a number of principles which out-of-court bodies involved in consumer ADR should comply with (Recommendation 1998/257 and Recommendation 2001/310).
Those principles are very important to ensure the success of consumer ADR.
Those principles are very important to ensure the success of consumer ADR.
We therefore consider that the principles of transparency, impartiality, effectiveness and fairness included in Recommandation 2001/310 (consensual resolution of consumer disputes) should be incorporated in the proposed directive.
We therefore consider that the principles of transparency, impartiality, effectiveness and fairness included in Recommandation 2001/310 (consensual resolution of consumer disputes) should be incorporated in the proposed directive.
6) Медиацията може да предостави възможност за икономично и бързо извънсъдебно разрешаване на спорове в областта на гражданското и търговското право посредством способи, пригодени за нуждите на страните.
(6) Mediation can provide a cost-efficient and quick extra-judicial resolution of disputes in civil and commercial matters through processes tailored to the needs of the parties.
При споразуменията, постигнати чрез медиация , съществува по-голяма вероятност те да бъдат доброволно прилагани, както и е по-вероятно да спомогнат за запазването на приятелска и устойчива връзка между страните.
Settlement a greements reached through mediation are more likely to be enforced voluntarily and are more likely to preserve an amicable and sustainable relationship between the parties.
Тези ползи са още по-явни в ситуации, включващи трансгранични елементи.
These benefits become even more pronounced in situations displaying cross-border elements.
При споразуменията, постигнати след медиация , съществува по-голяма вероятност те да бъдат доброволно прилагани, както и е по-вероятно да спомогнат за запазването на приятелска и устойчива връзка между страните.
A greements resulting from mediation are more likely to be enforced voluntarily and are more likely to preserve an amicable and sustainable relationship between the parties.
(Настоящото изменение се прилага по отношение на целия разглеждан текст; приемането му изисква техническа преработка на текста.)
(This amendment applies to the entire legislative text under consideration; its adoption requires technical adaptations throughout the text.)
7а) Държавите-членки се насърчават да прилагат разпоредбите на настоящата директива и по отношение на вътрешни спорове, с оглед улесняване на правилното функциониране на вътрешния пазар.
(7a) Member States are encouraged to apply the provisions of this Directive also to internal cases with a view notably to facilitating the proper functioning of the internal market.
Освен това, фактът, че разпоредбите на директивата изрично ограничават приложното поле до спорове с трансгранични последици, няма ограничителен ефект по отношение на разпоредби на националното законодателство, които предвиждат изпълнимостта на постигнати след медиация споразумения, поверителност на медиацията или последиците на медиацията по отношение на давностните срокове при спорове, които не попадат в приложното поле на директивата.
Moreover, the fact that the provisions of the Directive are expressed as being limited to cases having cross-border implications should not have the effect of limiting rules of national law that currently provide for the enforceability of agreements resulting from mediation, the confidentiality of mediation or the effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods also in cases not covered by the Directive.
8) В приложното поле на настоящата директива следва да влизат процедури, при които две или повече страни по даден спор се подпомагат от медиатор за постигането на приятелско споразумение относно разрешаването на спора, но не и процедури с квазисъдебен характер като арбитраж, процедура пред омбудсман, процедури за защита на потребителите, експертни решения, както и процедури пред органи, които издават задължителни или незадължителни официални препоръки за разрешаването на спора.
(8) This directive should cover processes where two or more parties to a dispute are assisted by a mediator to reach an amicable agreement on the settlement of the dispute, but exclude processes of an adjudicatory nature such as arbitration, ombudsmen schemes, consumer complaint schemes, expert determination or processes administered by bodies issuing a formal recommendation, be it legally binding or not, as to the resolution of the dispute.
8) В приложното поле на настоящата директива следва да влизат процедури, при които две или повече страни по даден трансграничен спор се подпомагат от медиатор за постигането на приятелско споразумение относно разрешаването на спора, но не и процедури като преговори по предварителен договор или процедури с квазисъдебен характер като арбитраж, процедури на съдебно помирение, процедура пред омбудсман, процедури за защита на потребителите, експертни решения, както и процедури пред органи, които издават задължителни или незадължителни официални препоръки за разрешаването на спора.
(8) This Directive should cover processes where two or more parties to a cross-border dispute are assisted by a mediator to reach an amicable agreement on the settlement of the dispute, but exclude processes such as pre-contractual negotiations or processes of an adjudicatory nature such as arbitration, judicial conciliation schemes, ombudsman schemes, consumer complaint schemes, expert determination or processes administered by bodies issuing a formal recommendation, be it legally binding or not, as to the resolution of the dispute.
Случаите, когато съдът насочва страните към разрешаване на спора чрез медиация, или когато това се изисква от националното законодателство също трябва да бъдат включени в приложното поле на директивата, като се запазва принципът на доброволност на медиацията и разпоредби в националното законодателство, съгласно които медиацията е задължителна или подлежи на насърчения или санкции, не следва да възпрепятстват страните да упражняват правото си на достъп до съдебната система.
Cases where a court refers parties to mediation or in which national law prescribes mediation should also be covered, although the principle remains that mediation is a voluntary process and national legislation making the use of mediation compulsory or subject to incentives or sanctions should not prevent parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.
Освен това, медиация, осъществявана от съдия, който не е натоварен с воденето на съдебно производство, свързано с въпроса или въпросите предмет на спора, също следва да бъде включена в приложното поле на настоящата директива.
Furthermore, mediation conducted by a judge who is not responsible for any judicial proceedings relating to the matter or matters in dispute should also come within the scope of this Directive.
Независимо от това, настоящата директива не се прилага за опити от страна на сезирания съд или съдия да разреши спор в рамките на съдебно производство, отнасящо се до същия спор, или за случаи, в които сезираният съд или съдия иска съдействие или съвет от компетентно лице.
Nevertheless, this Directive does not extend to attempts made by the court or judge seised to settle a dispute in the context of judicial proceedings concerning that dispute or to cases in which the court or judge seised requests assistance or advice from a competent person.
9) Необходима е минимална степен на съвместимост на гражданскопроцесуалните разпоредби във връзка с ефекта на медиацията върху давностните срокове и относно начина, по който ще бъде защитена поверителността относно медиатора в последващи съдебни производства.
(9) A minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules is necessary as concerns the effect of mediation on limitation periods and how the confidentiality of the mediator will be protected in any subsequent judicial proceedings.
Възможността съдът да насочи страните спорът да бъде разрешен чрез медиация също трябва да бъде включена в директивата, като се запази принципът на доброволност на медиацията.
The possibility for the court to refer the parties to mediation should also be covered, while retaining the principle that mediation is a voluntary process.
9) Предвид значението на поверителността в медиационния процес, е необходима минимална степен на съвместимост на гражданскопроцесуалните разпоредби във връзка с начина, по който е защитена поверителността относно медиацията в последващи граждански и търговски, съдебни или арбитражни производства.
(9) Given the importance of confidentiality in the mediation process, a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules is necessary with regard to how the confidentiality of the mediation is protected in any subsequent civil and commercial, judicial or arbitration proceedings.
Възможността съдът да обърне внимание на страните на възможността спорът да бъде разрешен чрез медиация също трябва да бъде включена в директивата, като се запази принципът на доброволност на медиацията.
The possibility for the court to draw the parties' attention to mediation should also be covered, while retaining the principle that mediation is a voluntary process.
Необходимо е също така да се осигури минимална степен на съвместимост на гражданскопроцесуалните разпоредби във връзка с последиците на медиацията по отношение на давностните срокове.
It is also necessary to provide for a minimum degree of compatibility of civil procedural rules with regard to the effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods.