natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The appropriations will be entered in the general budget of the European Union as a provision through the normal budgetary procedure as soon as the Commission has identified the sufficient margins and/or cancelled commitments, in accordance with the second paragraph.
The appropriations will be entered in the general budget of the European Union as a provision through the normal budgetary procedure as soon as the Commission has identified the sufficient margins and/or cancelled commitments, in accordance with the second paragraph.
When the conditions for mobilising the Fund, as set out in the relevant basic act, are met, the Commission will make a proposal to deploy it.
When the conditions for mobilising the Fund, as set out in the relevant basic act, are met, the Commission will make a proposal to deploy it.
The decision to deploy the Fund will be taken jointly by the two arms of the budgetary authority in accordance with Point 3.
The decision to deploy the Fund will be taken jointly by the two arms of the budgetary authority in accordance with Point 3.
At the same time as it presents its proposal for a decision to deploy the Fund, the Commission will initiate a trilogue procedure, if necessary in a simplified form, to secure agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the Fund and on the amount required, and will present to the two arms of the budgetary authority a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary lines.
At the same time as it presents its proposal for a decision to deploy the Fund, the Commission will initiate a trilogue procedure, if necessary in a simplified form, to secure agreement of the two arms of the budgetary authority on the need to use the Fund and on the amount required, and will present to the two arms of the budgetary authority a proposal for a transfer to the relevant budgetary lines.
Transfers related to the Fund will be made in accordance with Article 24(4) of the Financial Regulation.
Transfers related to the Fund will be made in accordance with Article 24(4) of the Financial Regulation.
The corresponding commitment appropriations will be entered in the budget under the relevant heading, if necessary over and above the ceilings laid down in Annex I."
The corresponding commitment appropriations will be entered in the budget under the relevant heading, if necessary over and above the ceilings laid down in Annex I."
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p.
Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p.
State of play: Commission's proposal
State of play: Commission's proposal
In March 2007, France submitted applications to mobilise the Fund
In March 2007, France submitted applications to mobilise the Fund
Applications EGF/2007/01/FR/PSA and EGF/2007/02/FR/RSA . , in respect of two cases concerning redundancies in the automobile sector, specifically suppliers to Peugeot SA and Renault SA.
Applications EGF/2007/01/FR/PSA and EGF/2007/02/FR/RSA . , in respect of two cases concerning redundancies in the automobile sector, specifically suppliers to Peugeot SA and Renault SA.
The Commission considers that the two applications meet the intervention criteria and other requirements laid down in the legal basis
The Commission considers that the two applications meet the intervention criteria and other requirements laid down in the legal basis
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 establishing the EGF (OJ L 406 of, 30.02.2006). .
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 establishing the EGF (OJ L 406 of, 30.02.2006). .
On 12 July, the Commission adopted its proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the Fund for a total amount of EUR 3 816 280, to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework 2007-2013.
On 12 July, the Commission adopted its proposal for a decision on the mobilisation of the Fund for a total amount of EUR 3 816 280, to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework 2007-2013.
The total estimates of the coordinated packages of personalised services to be funded are as follows:
The total estimates of the coordinated packages of personalised services to be funded are as follows:
Personalised services to be funded (in EUR)
Personalised services to be funded (in EUR)
France: PSA 01/2007
France: PSA 01/2007
2 558 250
2 558 250
France: RSA 02/2007
France: RSA 02/2007
1 258 030
1 258 030
3 816 280
3 816 280
The total annual budget available for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund is EUR 500 million.
The total annual budget available for the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund is EUR 500 million.
In 2007, no resources have been earmarked for earlier applications leaving the full amount available.
In 2007, no resources have been earmarked for earlier applications leaving the full amount available.
Thus the requested amount of support will leave more than 25% of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the Fund available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12 (6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Thus the requested amount of support will leave more than 25% of the maximum annual amount earmarked for the Fund available for allocations during the last four months of the year, as required by Article 12 (6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
· RESERVE FOR THE EUROPEAN GLOBALISATION ADJUSTMENT FUND-Article 40 02 43
· RESERVE FOR THE EUROPEAN GLOBALISATION ADJUSTMENT FUND-Article 40 02 43
Appropriations 2008
Appropriations 2008
Appropriations 2007
Appropriations 2007
500 000 000
500 000 000
· EUROPEAN GLOBALISATION ADJUSTMENT FUND (EGF) - Chapter 04 05
· EUROPEAN GLOBALISATION ADJUSTMENT FUND (EGF) - Chapter 04 05
04 05 01
04 05 01
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF)
Article 04 05 01 — Subtotal
Article 04 05 01 — Subtotal
Chapter 04 05 — Total
Chapter 04 05 — Total
The Commission has presented transfer request
The Commission has presented transfer request
DEC 27/2007, SEC(2007)685 final of 19.07.2007 in order to enter specific commitment and payment appropriations in the 2007 budget, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
DEC 27/2007, SEC(2007)685 final of 19.07.2007 in order to enter specific commitment and payment appropriations in the 2007 budget, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
The Commission's proposal for a Ddecision on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund was on the agenda of the trilogue of 6 July 2007 and of the budgetary conciliation of 13 July 2007.
The Commission's proposal for a Ddecision on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund was on the agenda of the trilogue of 6 July 2007 and of the budgetary conciliation of 13 July 2007.
The European Parliament delegation has recalled the three elements to be met:
The European Parliament delegation has recalled the three elements to be met:-
i. the money should be available in the reserve, which is the case (see below);
i. the money should be available in the reserve, which is the case (see below);
ii. the procedure should respect the order set up by the legal act;
ii. the procedure should respect the order set up by the legal act;
iii. the Commission should inform the EP beforehand of Member States' applications.
iii. the Commission should inform the EP beforehand of Member States' applications.
According to an internal agreement with the EMPL Committee (letter Böge/Andersson to Commissioner Špidla)., this committee should be associated to the process.
According to an internal agreement with the EMPL Committee (letter Böge/Andersson to Commissioner Špidla)., this committee should be associated to the process.
The opinion (in the form of a letter) of the EMPL committee is included in the current draft report.
The opinion (in the form of a letter) of the EMPL committee is included in the current draft report.
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯТА ПО ЗАЕТОСТ И СОЦИАЛНИ ВЪПРОСИ
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
Генерална дирекция "Вътрешни политики"
Directorate-General for Internal Policies
Г-н Reimer Böge
Mr. Reimer Böge
Председател на комисията по бюджети
Chairman of the Committee on Budgets
ASP 05F365
ASP 05F365
Относно: Становище за мобилизиране на Европейския фонд за приспособяване към глобализацията във връзка с делата EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA и EGF/2007/02/Renault SA
Subject: Opinion on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) for the cases EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA and EGF/2007/02/Renault SA
Уважаеми г-н Böge,
Dear Mr Böge,
На нашето заседание от 12 септември 2007 г. комисията по заетост и социални въпроси реши да изрази следното становище относно мобилизирането на Европейския фонд за приспособяване към глобализацията във връзка с делата EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA и EGF/2007/02/Renault SA, под формата на настоящото писмо.
At our meeting of 12 September 2007 the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (EMPL) decided to deliver the following opinion on the mobilisation of the EGF for the cases EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA and EGF/2007/02/Renault SA, in the form of this letter.
Съгласно член 12 от Регламент (EО) № 1927/2006 относно създаването на Европейския фонд за приспособяване към глобализацията (ЕФПГ), трансферите на средства от ЕФПГ се считат за одобрени, ако са одобрени както от Парламента, така и от Съвета.
Pursuant to Article 12 of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 on establishing the EGF, transfers concerning the EGF shall be deemed to be approved by both Parliament and Council.
Следователно, комисията по заетост и социални въпроси счита за много важно, Парламентът да вземе решение в кратки срокове, за да даде ясен сигнал на европейските граждани за способността на европейските институции за бързо реагиране на осезаемите негативни последици от глобализацията, засягащи работниците от ЕС.
Therefore, the EMPL Committee considers crucial the prompt delivery of Parliament's Decision, so as to give a tangible signal to the European citizens on the European institutions' ability to react swiftly to the perceived negative effects of globalisation affecting EU workers.
След изчерпателно разглеждане на двете заявления, комисията по заетост и социални въпроси, прие, че двете заявления отговарят на критериите, посочени в Регламент (EО) № 1927/2006 (вж. членове 2, 3 4, 5 и 6 ) и следователно, подкрепя мобилизирането на Европейския фонд за приспособяване към глобализацията във връзка с делата EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA и EGF/2007/02/Renault SA, за които Франция подаде заявления.
Following a thorough examination of the two applications, the EMPL Committee accepted that both requests fulfil the criteria laid out in the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 ( see Articles 2, 3 4,5 and 6 ) and, therefore, is in favour of mobilising the EGF for the cases submitted by France: EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA and EGF/2007/02/Renault SA.
Най-важните елементи от оценките могат да бъдат резюмирани, както следва:
The most important elements of the assessments can be summarised as follows:
а) Дело EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA
a) Case EGF/2007/01/FR/Peugeot SA
Заявлението бе подадено в 10-седмичния срок, посочен в член 5 от Регламент (EО) № 1927/2006.
The application was submitted within the deadline of 10 weeks referred to in Article 5 of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Критерии за интервенция (член 2 от Регламент (EО) № 1927/2006)
Intervention criteria (art 2 of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006)
В заявлението, подадено от Франция до Комисията на 9 март 2007 г., се посочват общо 1 345 обявени съкращения за четиримесечен период в индустрията, доставяща автомобилни части за Peugeot SA (PSA).
The application presented by France to the Commission on 9 March 2007, demonstrated a total of 1.345 notified redundancies over a period of 4 months amongst the industry supplying car parts to Peugeot SA (PSA).
Анализът на заявлението показва, че тези съкращения са причинени основно от засилената конкуренция между увеличения внос на автомобили, произведени в Япония и Корея (+ 27%), и производството на по-малки автомобили в ЕС.
The analysis of the application suggests that these redundancies were mainly caused by the enhanced competition between the increased imports of cars manufactured in Japan and Korea (+ 27%) and the production of smaller cars in the EU.
Тъй като производството на автомобили от PSA до голяма степен е концентрирано в тези по-ниски сегменти, Франция заяви, че промените в моделите на световната търговия са засегнали този производител и са довели до сериозен икономически срив.
As car production by PSA is to a large extent concentrated in these lower segments, France claimed that these changes in world trade patterns have affected this manufacturer and led to a serious economic disruption.
Критерии за допълняемост, съответствие и координация (член 6 от Регламент (EО) № 1927/2006)
Complementarity, compliance and coordination criteria (art 6 of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006)
Франция потвърди, наред с другото, че финансовата помощ от ЕФПГ не замества мерките, за които фирмите носят отговорност по силата на националното законодателство или на колективно споразумение.
France confirmed inter alia that the financial contribution from the EGF does not replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreement.
б) Дело EGF/2007/02/Renault SA
b) Case EGF/2007/02/Renault SA
Критерии за прилагане
Application criteria
Критерии за интервенция
Intervention criteria
В заявлението, подадено от Франция до Комисията на 23 март 2007 г., се посочват общо 1 057 обявени съкращения за четиримесечен период в 10 различни доставчика на Renault SA (RSA).
The application presented by France to the Commission on 23 March 2007, demonstrated a total of 1.057 notified redundancies over a period of 4 months amongst 10 different suppliers to Renault SA (RSA).
Анализът на заявлението показва, че тези съкращения са причинени основно от засилената конкуренция между увеличения внос на автомобили, произведени в Япония и Корея (+ 27%), и производството на по-малки автомобили в ЕС.
The analysis of the application shows that these redundancies were mainly caused by the enhanced competition between the increased imports of cars manufactured in Japan and Korea (+ 27%) and the production of smaller cars in the EU.
Тъй като производството на автомобили от RSA до голяма степен е концентрирано в тези по-ниски сегменти, Франция заяви, че промените в моделите на световната търговия са засегнали този производител и са довели до сериозен икономически срив.
As car production by RSA is to a large extent concentrated in these lower segments, France claimed that these changes in world trade patterns have affected this manufacturer and led to a serious economic disruption.
Критерии за допълняемост, съответствие и координация
Complementarity, compliance and coordination criteria
Франция потвърди, наред с другото, че финансовата помощ ЕФПГ не замества мерките, за които фирмите носят отговорност по силата на националното законодателство или на колективно споразумение.
France confirmed inter alia that the financial contribution from the EGF does not replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of national law or collective agreement.
Комисията по заетост и социални въпроси призовава комисията по бюджети, в качеството си на водеща комисия, да включи тези съображения в решението си.
The EMPL Committee calls on the Committee on Budgets, as the Committee responsible, to integrate these considerations in its decision.
Комисията по заетост и социални въпроси изразява увереност, че е необходимо да се създаде система за ранно предупреждение между Европейския парламент и Комисията, под формата на ранно предоставяне на заявленията, получени от последната, с оглед постигане на безпроблемно сътрудничество на Парламента с Комисията и Съвета, позволяващо ефективното и навременно мобилизиране на ЕФПГ.
The EMPL Committee is confident that an early warning system between the European Parliament and the Commission, in the form of early communication of requests received by the latter, is indispensable for a seamless cooperation with the Commission and Council allowing an efficient and timely mobilisation of the EGF.
Председател на комисията по заетост и социални въпроси
EMPL Chairman
Cc: Г-жа Gabriele Stauner, Член на ЕП
Cc: Ms. Gabriele Stauner, MEP
Г-жа Anne Vitrey, Секретариат на комисията по бюджети
Ms. Anne Vitrey, COBU-Secretariat
Thijs Berman, Richard Corbett, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva
Thijs Berman, Richard Corbett, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva
относно предложението за решение на Съвета относно подписването на Споразумение между Европейската общност и Република Черна гора за улесняване на издаването на визи за краткосрочно пребиваване
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Montenegro on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visas
PE 394.121v02-00
PE 394.121v02-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по външни работи .................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...................................................8
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2007)0426 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2007)0426 )
– като взе предвид член 62, параграф 2, буква б(i) и член 300, параграф 2, алинея 1, първо изречение от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Articles 62(2)(b)(i) and (ii) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея 1 от Договора за ЕО, съобразно която Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0297/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0297/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи и становището на комисията по външни работи ( A6‑0379/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0379/2007 ),
The European Parliament is consulted on the approval of the conclusion of two mutually conditional and parallel agreements with the Western Balkans: Readmission agreements with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro, and agreements with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visa (Albania having already concluded a readmission agreement in 2005).
The European Parliament is consulted on the approval of the conclusion of two mutually conditional and parallel agreements with the Western Balkans: Readmission agreements with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro, and agreements with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania on the facilitation of issuance of short-stay visa (Albania having already concluded a readmission agreement in 2005).
The EU-Western Balkans Summit held in Thessaloniki on 21 June 2003 reaffirmed the importance for the Western Balkan countries of concluding visa facilitation and readmission agreements for coping with illegal migration issues.
The EU-Western Balkans Summit held in Thessaloniki on 21 June 2003 reaffirmed the importance for the Western Balkan countries of concluding visa facilitation and readmission agreements for coping with illegal migration issues.
The rapporteur welcomes and underlines the importance of these agreements for the Western Balkans that need to be seen as a package that benefit both sides; the EU and this region of strategic importance to the EU, which includes countries that hold an EU membership perspective (Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia having been granted candidate status).
The rapporteur welcomes and underlines the importance of these agreements for the Western Balkans that need to be seen as a package that benefit both sides; the EU and this region of strategic importance to the EU, which includes countries that hold an EU membership perspective (Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia having been granted candidate status).
The conclusion of such agreements on visa facilitation must be seen as an important step that can encourage the Western Balkan countries to implement relevant reforms and reinforce their cooperation at regional level and with the EU in areas such as strengthening the rule of law, fighting organised crime and corruption, and increasing their administrative capacity as regards border control and the security of documents by introducing biometric identifiers.
The conclusion of such agreements on visa facilitation must be seen as an important step that can encourage the Western Balkan countries to implement relevant reforms and reinforce their cooperation at regional level and with the EU in areas such as strengthening the rule of law, fighting organised crime and corruption, and increasing their administrative capacity as regards border control and the security of documents by introducing biometric identifiers.
A well-functioning immigration system requires effective readmission agreements, and no visa facilitation agreement should be concluded if no readmission agreements are in place.
A well-functioning immigration system requires effective readmission agreements, and no visa facilitation agreement should be concluded if no readmission agreements are in place.
However the EU should also consider making use of other instruments to achieve the conclusion and implementation of a readmission agreement, e.g. political, economic, commercial or development policy related.
However the EU should also consider making use of other instruments to achieve the conclusion and implementation of a readmission agreement, e.g. political, economic, commercial or development policy related.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that the EC takes account of JHA factors in deciding whether to open negotiations on visa facilitation with third countries, such as border management, document security, migration and asylum, fight against terrorism, organized crime and corruption.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that the EC takes account of JHA factors in deciding whether to open negotiations on visa facilitation with third countries, such as border management, document security, migration and asylum, fight against terrorism, organized crime and corruption.
Indeed, Albania, Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina each face specific challenges in these areas that need a differentiated approach.
Indeed, Albania, Montenegro, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina each face specific challenges in these areas that need a differentiated approach.
The rapporteur remains however very critical of the very limited role of the European Parliament in the conclusion of such agreements, a regrettable fact that increases the democratic deficit between the European institutions and its citizens.
The rapporteur remains however very critical of the very limited role of the European Parliament in the conclusion of such agreements, a regrettable fact that increases the democratic deficit between the European institutions and its citizens.
These issues have direct implications for the EU citizens and the EP is unfortunately not informed at any stage of the opening of negotiations, during the negotiations, as regards the impact of readmission and visa agreements and its implications in terms of human rights and asylum rights.
These issues have direct implications for the EU citizens and the EP is unfortunately not informed at any stage of the opening of negotiations, during the negotiations, as regards the impact of readmission and visa agreements and its implications in terms of human rights and asylum rights.