natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Gabriela Creţu, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Edit Herczog, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Giovanni Rivera, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Alexander Stubb, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marianne Thyssen, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Nicola Zingaretti
Gabriela Creţu, Janelly Fourtou, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Edit Herczog, Kurt Lechner, Lasse Lehtinen, Toine Manders, Arlene McCarthy, Nickolay Mladenov, Catherine Neris, Bill Newton Dunn, Zita Pleštinská, Giovanni Rivera, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Alexander Stubb, Eva-Britt Svensson, Marianne Thyssen, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Nicola Zingaretti
Emmanouil Angelakas, André Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Giovanna Corda, Benoît Hamon, Gisela Kallenbach, Othmar Karas, Andrea Losco, Manuel Medina Ortega, Joseph Muscat, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Olle Schmidt, Gary Titley, Diana Wallis, Stefano Zappalà
Emmanouil Angelakas, André Brie, Wolfgang Bulfon, Giovanna Corda, Benoît Hamon, Gisela Kallenbach, Othmar Karas, Andrea Losco, Manuel Medina Ortega, Joseph Muscat, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Olle Schmidt, Gary Titley, Diana Wallis, Stefano Zappalà
Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Tadeusz Zwiefka
относно общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемане на директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Директива 97/67/ЕО относно пълното изграждане на вътрешния пазар на пощенски услуги на Общността
on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services
PE 396.541v02-00
PE 396.541v02-00
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (13593/6/2007 – C6‑0410/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (13593/6/2007 – C6‑0410/2007 ),
Текстове приети, 11.7.2007 г., P6_TA(2007)0336 . относно предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2006)0594 ),
Texts adopted, 11.7.2007, P6_TA(2007)0336 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0594 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0505/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0505/2007 ),
Postal Services in the EU are currently covered by the 1997 Postal Directive (97/67/EC).
Postal Services in the EU are currently covered by the 1997 Postal Directive (97/67/EC).
This created a regulatory framework which guarantees citizens a universal service, while gradually limiting the scope of the reserved area (initially mail under 350 grams, amended in 2002 to 100 grams and reduced on 1 January 2006 to 50 grams).
This created a regulatory framework which guarantees citizens a universal service, while gradually limiting the scope of the reserved area (initially mail under 350 grams, amended in 2002 to 100 grams and reduced on 1 January 2006 to 50 grams).
The Directive aims at ensuring the best possible service through a gradual opening of the market, with a final target set for full opening in 2009.
The Directive aims at ensuring the best possible service through a gradual opening of the market, with a final target set for full opening in 2009.
It includes a requirement that the Commission should provide periodic reports on its implementation, and, before the end of 2006, confirm whether the 2009 date remains appropriate.
It includes a requirement that the Commission should provide periodic reports on its implementation, and, before the end of 2006, confirm whether the 2009 date remains appropriate.
Based on a prospective study on the impact on universal service of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market, the Commission in October 2006 put forward the present proposal for amendment of Directive 97/67/EC.
Based on a prospective study on the impact on universal service of the full accomplishment of the postal internal market, the Commission in October 2006 put forward the present proposal for amendment of Directive 97/67/EC.
The proposal confirms 1st of January 2009 as the date, by which national operators would no longer have a monopoly on mail below 50 grams.
The proposal confirms 1st of January 2009 as the date, by which national operators would no longer have a monopoly on mail below 50 grams.
The current obligation on Member States to ensure a high-quality and affordable universal service would remain.
The current obligation on Member States to ensure a high-quality and affordable universal service would remain.
The Commission proposes a number of accompanying measures, which aim to safeguard the universal service, such as abolishment of mandatory ex-ante designation of providers and cost-oriented tariffs.
The Commission proposes a number of accompanying measures, which aim to safeguard the universal service, such as abolishment of mandatory ex-ante designation of providers and cost-oriented tariffs.
As regards the financing of possible net-costs arising from universal service provision, the Commission clarifies a number of alternatives but leaves Member States the freedom to choose the method that is best adapted to their particular situation.
As regards the financing of possible net-costs arising from universal service provision, the Commission clarifies a number of alternatives but leaves Member States the freedom to choose the method that is best adapted to their particular situation.
EP First Reading
EP First Reading
Your rapporteur has supported the core objectives of the Commission's proposal from the beginning of the legislative procedure.
Your rapporteur has supported the core objectives of the Commission's proposal from the beginning of the legislative procedure.
The determination of a fixed and irrevocable date for the completion of the internal market in postal services is of particular importance, since market opening will provide for greater competition and thus improve service levels in terms of quality, price and choice available to consumers.
The determination of a fixed and irrevocable date for the completion of the internal market in postal services is of particular importance, since market opening will provide for greater competition and thus improve service levels in terms of quality, price and choice available to consumers.
It will also create the conditions for increased growth and employment in this sector.
It will also create the conditions for increased growth and employment in this sector.
However, several aspects of the proposal require clarification or fine-tuning.
However, several aspects of the proposal require clarification or fine-tuning.
Throughout the first reading stage, your rapporteur had extensive discussions with colleagues both in the Transport Committee and the opinion-giving committees with a view to finding compromise solutions on a number of key issues.
Throughout the first reading stage, your rapporteur had extensive discussions with colleagues both in the Transport Committee and the opinion-giving committees with a view to finding compromise solutions on a number of key issues.
The negotiations eventually resulted in a compromise package, which was supported by a large majority at the vote in plenary in July 2007.
The negotiations eventually resulted in a compromise package, which was supported by a large majority at the vote in plenary in July 2007.
The most significant elements of the EP's position in first reading are as follows:
The most significant elements of the EP's position in first reading are as follows:
- Dates for market opening : The deadline for market opening should be set for 31 December 2010.
- Dates for market opening : The deadline for market opening should be set for 31 December 2010.
This way, operators and regulators in countries that are lagging behind in the liberalisation process will have more time to adjust.
This way, operators and regulators in countries that are lagging behind in the liberalisation process will have more time to adjust.
The 12 Member States having acceded in 2004 or later as well as Member States with a particularly difficult topography would have an additional two years to open the market (31 December 2012).
The 12 Member States having acceded in 2004 or later as well as Member States with a particularly difficult topography would have an additional two years to open the market (31 December 2012).
- Reciprocity : In order to avoid market distortion and unfair competition, those Member States having opened their markets should be able to refuse authorisation to operators still being protected by a national monopoly (reserved area) in another Member State.
- Reciprocity : In order to avoid market distortion and unfair competition, those Member States having opened their markets should be able to refuse authorisation to operators still being protected by a national monopoly (reserved area) in another Member State.
- Guaranteed universal service : The universal service must continue to be provided to the full extent, i.e. comprising at least one delivery and collection five days a week for every EU citizen.
- Guaranteed universal service : The universal service must continue to be provided to the full extent, i.e. comprising at least one delivery and collection five days a week for every EU citizen.
Moreover, it is important to maintain well-functioning postal networks with a sufficient number of access points in rural, remote or sparsely populated regions in order to satisfy the universal service obligation.
Moreover, it is important to maintain well-functioning postal networks with a sufficient number of access points in rural, remote or sparsely populated regions in order to satisfy the universal service obligation.
- Social considerations should, in general, be taken into account in the process of market opening.
- Social considerations should, in general, be taken into account in the process of market opening.
In particular, Member States should be able to reflect working conditions in their authorisation procedures.
In particular, Member States should be able to reflect working conditions in their authorisation procedures.
Member States must also have the right to impose conditions on the supply of postal services for non-economic reasons, such as compliance with employment conditions and social security schemes laid down by law and/or by collective agreement negotiated between national social partners.
Member States must also have the right to impose conditions on the supply of postal services for non-economic reasons, such as compliance with employment conditions and social security schemes laid down by law and/or by collective agreement negotiated between national social partners.
- Financing : Where a Member State determines that the universal service obligations entail a net cost, it should draw up a financing plan and notify the Commission.
- Financing : Where a Member State determines that the universal service obligations entail a net cost, it should draw up a financing plan and notify the Commission.
The Commission should provide guidance on the calculation of net costs.
The Commission should provide guidance on the calculation of net costs.
Council Common Position
Council Common Position
Your rapporteur is pleased that Council incorporated all the major elements of the European Parliament's position as outlined above into its Common Position.
Your rapporteur is pleased that Council incorporated all the major elements of the European Parliament's position as outlined above into its Common Position.
Some modifications were made by the Council as regards the Directive's structure, but these do not affect the substance of the major amendments introduced by Parliament.
Some modifications were made by the Council as regards the Directive's structure, but these do not affect the substance of the major amendments introduced by Parliament.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes that according to the Common Position, the countries which may postpone full market opening until the end of 2012 are now named explicitly and that the guidance on the calculation of net costs becomes part of the Directive in form of a newly introduced Annex.
Furthermore, your rapporteur welcomes that according to the Common Position, the countries which may postpone full market opening until the end of 2012 are now named explicitly and that the guidance on the calculation of net costs becomes part of the Directive in form of a newly introduced Annex.
Your rapporteur appreciates the Council's endorsement of the compromise reached in Parliament and therefore recommends that the Common Position be approved without amendment.
Your rapporteur appreciates the Council's endorsement of the compromise reached in Parliament and therefore recommends that the Common Position be approved without amendment.
Пълно изграждане на вътрешния пазар на пощенски услуги на Общността
Accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services
11.7.2007 T6-0336/2007
11.7.2007 T6-0336/2007
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Armando Veneto, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Seán Ó Neachtain, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Armando Veneto, Roberts Zīle
Luigi Cocilovo, Markus Ferber, Nathalie Griesbeck, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Lily Jacobs, Vladimír Remek, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Luigi Cocilovo, Markus Ferber, Nathalie Griesbeck, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Lily Jacobs, Vladimír Remek, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Corien Wortmann-Kool
PE 396.503v02-00
PE 396.503v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и Съвета ( COM(2007)0509 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0509 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 71 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0278/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0278/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ( A6‑0506/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6‑0506/2007 ),
Directive 94/55/EC lays down uniform safety rules for the transport of dangerous goods by road.
Directive 94/55/EC lays down uniform safety rules for the transport of dangerous goods by road.
This Directive will be repealed and replaced by the forthcoming Directive on the inland transport of dangerous goods, on which Parliament adopted its first reading position on 5 September 2007.
This Directive will be repealed and replaced by the forthcoming Directive on the inland transport of dangerous goods, on which Parliament adopted its first reading position on 5 September 2007.
The procedures for checks to be carried out by Member States on the transport of dangerous goods by road are laid down in a separate piece of legislation, namely in Directive 95/50/EC.
The procedures for checks to be carried out by Member States on the transport of dangerous goods by road are laid down in a separate piece of legislation, namely in Directive 95/50/EC.
Each Member State shall send the Commission for each calendar year a report on the application of the Directive, drawn up in accordance with the model in Annex III.
Each Member State shall send the Commission for each calendar year a report on the application of the Directive, drawn up in accordance with the model in Annex III.
Articles 9a and 9b of Directive 95/50/EC confer certain implementing powers to the Commission in respect of the adaptation of the Directive's Annexes to scientific and technical progress, taking into account possible amendments to Directive 94/55/EC.
Articles 9a and 9b of Directive 95/50/EC confer certain implementing powers to the Commission in respect of the adaptation of the Directive's Annexes to scientific and technical progress, taking into account possible amendments to Directive 94/55/EC.
At present, the Commission exercises these delegated implementing powers in accordance with the so-called 'regulatory procedure', which allows it to proceed with decisions, even if the Parliament opposes them.
At present, the Commission exercises these delegated implementing powers in accordance with the so-called 'regulatory procedure', which allows it to proceed with decisions, even if the Parliament opposes them.
In July 2006 a new comitology procedure, the 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny', was introduced through a revision of Council Decision 1999/468/EC.
In July 2006 a new comitology procedure, the 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny', was introduced through a revision of Council Decision 1999/468/EC.
The new procedure significantly increases the European Parliament's rights, as it may not only scrutinise a draft implementing measure, but also, under certain conditions, oppose a draft measure or propose amendments.
The new procedure significantly increases the European Parliament's rights, as it may not only scrutinise a draft implementing measure, but also, under certain conditions, oppose a draft measure or propose amendments.
The new procedure should be applied to measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the co-decision procedure.
The new procedure should be applied to measures of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of a basic instrument adopted in accordance with the co-decision procedure.
Since the adaptation of the Annexes to Directive 95/50/EC must be considered as measures of a general scope designed to amend non-essential elements, the Commission proposes to bring the comitology provisions of the Directive in line with the above Council Decision and thus to replace the existing procedure ('regulatory procedure') by the new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny'.
Since the adaptation of the Annexes to Directive 95/50/EC must be considered as measures of a general scope designed to amend non-essential elements, the Commission proposes to bring the comitology provisions of the Directive in line with the above Council Decision and thus to replace the existing procedure ('regulatory procedure') by the new 'regulatory procedure with scrutiny'.
In your rapporteur's view, the Annexes touch upon the Directive's substance relating to procedures for compliance checks.
In your rapporteur's view, the Annexes touch upon the Directive's substance relating to procedures for compliance checks.
Their adaptation would therefore need to be closely scrutinised by Parliament.
Their adaptation would therefore need to be closely scrutinised by Parliament.
Your rapporteur thus welcomes the Commission's proposal and suggests that it be approved without amendment.
Your rapporteur thus welcomes the Commission's proposal and suggests that it be approved without amendment.
Изменение на директива 95/50/ЕО във връзка с изпълнителните правомощия, предоставени на Комисията
Amendment of Directive 95/50/EC as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Armando Veneto, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Jean-Louis Bourlanges, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Robert Navarro, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Yannick Vaugrenard, Armando Veneto, Roberts Zīle
относно инициативата на Република Австрия с оглед на приемането на решение на Съвета относно подобряване на сътрудничеството между специалните звена на държавите-членки на Европейския съюз за намеса при кризисни ситуации
on the initiative of the Republic of Austria with a view to adopting a Council decision on the improvement of cooperation between the special intervention units of the Member States of the European Union in crisis situations
PE 396.521v02-00
PE 396.521v02-00
– като взе предвид инициативата на Република Австрия (15437/2006),
– having regard to the initiative of the Republic of Austria (15437/2006)
– като взе предвид членове 30, 32 и 34, параграф 2, буква в) от Договора за ЕС,
– having regard to Articles 30, 32 and 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 39, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕС, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0058/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0058/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0507/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0507/2007 ),
(4) Нито една държава-членка не разполага с всички средства, ресурси и експертни знания за ефективно справяне с всички възможни видове широкомащабни кризисни ситуации, които изискват специална намеса.
(4) No single Member State has all the means, resources and expertise at its disposal to deal effectively with all possible kinds of large scale crisis situations requiring special intervention.
(4) Нито една държава-членка не разполага с всички средства, ресурси и експертни знания за ефективно справяне с всички възможни видове конкретни или широкомащабни кризисни ситуации, които изискват специална намеса.
(4) No single Member State has all the means, resources and expertise at its disposal to deal effectively with all possible kinds of specific or large scale crisis situations requiring special intervention.