natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kader Arif, Graham Booth, Carlos Carnero González, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Eduard Raul Hellvig, Jacky Henin, Syed Kamall, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Caroline Lucas, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, David Martin, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Zbigniew Zaleski
Kader Arif, Graham Booth, Carlos Carnero González, Christofer Fjellner, Béla Glattfelder, Eduard Raul Hellvig, Jacky Henin, Syed Kamall, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Caroline Lucas, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, David Martin, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Zbigniew Zaleski
Jean-Pierre Audy, Panagiotis Beglitis, Danutė Budreikaitė, Albert Deß, Elisa Ferreira, Małgorzata Handzlik, Jens Holm, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Zuzana Roithová
Jean-Pierre Audy, Panagiotis Beglitis, Danutė Budreikaitė, Albert Deß, Elisa Ferreira, Małgorzata Handzlik, Jens Holm, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Zuzana Roithová
Sepp Kusstatscher, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Sepp Kusstatscher, Corien Wortmann-Kool
относно предложението за регламент на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (EО) № 2371/2002 относно опазването и устойчивата експлоатация на рибните ресурси в рамките на общата политика в областта на рибарството
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy
PE 384.479v02-00
PE 384.479v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0587 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0587 )
– като взе предвид член 37 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0402/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0402/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по рибно стопанство ( A6‑0085/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0085/2007 ),
- 4 % от средния годишен тонаж, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 януари 2003 г. до 31 декември 2006 г. за държавите-членки, които са били част от Общността на 1 януари 2003 г. и 4% от средния годишен тонаж, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 май 2004 г. до 31 декември 2006 г. за държавите-членки, присъединили се към Общността на 1 май 2004 г., и
- 4 % of the average annual tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that were part of the Community on 1 January 2003 and 4 % of the annual average tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 and,
- 10% от средния годишен тонаж, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 януари 2003 г. до 31 декември 2006 г. за държавите-членки, които са били част от Общността на 1 януари 2003 г. и 10% от средния годишен тонаж, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 май 2004 г. до 31 декември 2006 г. за държавите-членки, присъединили се към Общността на 1 май 2004 г., и
- 10 % of the average annual tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that were part of the Community on 1 January 2003 and 10 % of the annual average tonnage withdrawn with public aid between 1 May 2004 and 31 December 2006 for the Member States that acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 and,
- 4% от тонажа, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 януари 2007 г.
- 4 % of the tonnage withdrawn from the fleet with public aid as from 1 January 2007
- 10% от тонажа, който се изважда от експлоатация с публична помощ от 1 януари 2007 г.
- 10 % of the tonnage withdrawn from the fleet with public aid as from 1 January 2007
The proposed reallocation of 4 % of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid is too low in relation to the whole of the coastal fishing fleet and is not sufficient to improve safety, hygiene, working conditions, and product quality on board.
The proposed reallocation of 4% of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid is too low in relation to the whole of the coastal fishing fleet and is not sufficient to improve safety, hygiene, working conditions and product quality on board.
Въпреки това, отслабването на мощността не трябва по никакъв начин да намалява безопасността на кораба, неговото удобство, както и ефективността на системите за преработка на риба.
Nevertheless, this reduction in power must not under any circumstances diminish the vessel's safeness , habitability or the efficiency of fish-processing systems.
Освен това, когато отслабването има за цел избягване на нарастването на риболовния капацитет на плавателния съд , разпоредбите на алинея първа следва да не се вземат предвид, ако замяната на двигателя цели да се спести енергия и/или да се подобри работата на кораба в други области, различни от риболовния капацитет или когато, по отношение на използването на кораба, са избрани по-селективни методи за риболов.
Furthermore, given that the objective of the reduction is to avoid any increase in the vessel's fishing capacity, the provisions of the first subparagraph shall not be taken into account where the engine is replaced in order to conserve energy and/or improve the vessel's performance in areas other than fishing capacity, or where more selective fishing methods, as regards the use of the vessel, have been opted for.
In June 2006, after the political agreement reached in the Council on the new European Fisheries Fund, a decision was taken to amend two provisions of the basic regulation on the revised common fisheries policy (2371/2002) applying to the management of fishing fleet capacity.
In June 2006, after the political agreement reached in the Council on the new European Fisheries Fund, a decision was taken to amend two provisions of the basic regulation on the revised common fisheries policy (2371/2002) applying to the management of fishing fleet capacity.
The amendment is aimed at permitting some adaptations of the fleet to improve safety, working conditions and hygiene, product quality on board and energy efficiency.
The amendment is aimed at permitting some adaptations of the fleet to improve safety, working conditions and hygiene, product quality on board and energy efficiency.
More specifically, it is proposed to amend two articles in Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002: Article 11 on the adjustment of fishing capacity and Article 13 on the entry-exit scheme and overall capacity reduction.
More specifically, it is proposed to amend two articles in Chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002: Article 11 on the adjustment of fishing capacity and Article 13 on the entry-exit scheme and overall capacity reduction.
(a) The new Article 11 provides for the possibility to use 4% of the tonnage withdrawn or the tonnage to be withdrawn with public aid in order to carry out work to modernise fishing vessels in the context of safety and hygiene requirements and improve working conditions on board vessels;
(a) The new Article 11 provides for the possibility to use 4% of the tonnage withdrawn or the tonnage to be withdrawn with public aid in order to carry out work to modernise fishing vessels in the context of safety and hygiene requirements and improve working conditions on board vessels;
(b) The new Article 13, in keeping with the existing policy on fishing capacity reduction, adds a provision to the effect that the reduction in power linked to the replacement of the engine with public aid cannot be rebuilt.
(b) The new Article 13, in keeping with the existing policy on fishing capacity reduction, adds a provision to the effect that the reduction in power linked to the replacement of the engine with public aid cannot be rebuilt.
Rapporteur’s comments
Rapporteur’s comments
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal to amend the basic regulation on the common fisheries policy as regards the management of fleet capacity.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal to amend the basic regulation on the common fisheries policy as regards the management of fleet capacity.
The amendment will give the Member States the possibility for a limited increase in the capacity of their fleet for the purpose of improving safety, working conditions, hygiene and product quality on board, as well as energy efficiency.
The amendment will give the Member States the possibility for a limited increase in the capacity of their fleet for the purpose of improving safety, working conditions, hygiene and product quality on board, as well as energy efficiency.
As regards the amendment to Article 11, the rapporteur takes the view that the possibilities for using 4% of the tonnage withdrawn or the tonnage to be withdrawn with public aid are clear and positive, the aim being to carry out work to modernise fishing vessels for reasons of safety and hygiene.
As regards the amendment to Article 11, the rapporteur takes the view that the possibilities for using 4% of the tonnage withdrawn or the tonnage to be withdrawn with public aid are clear and positive, the aim being to carry out work to modernise fishing vessels for reasons of safety and hygiene.
The rapporteur agrees that, when allocating this percentage, priority should be given to small-scale coastal fishing vessels, i.e. vessels with an overall length of less than 12 metres, since this sector has been badly affected by the change in fishing conditions and its viability is uncertain.
The rapporteur agrees that, when allocating this percentage, priority should be given to small-scale coastal fishing vessels, i.e. vessels with an overall length of less than 12 metres, since this sector has been badly affected by the change in fishing conditions and its viability is uncertain.
The rapporteur nevertheless takes the view that the possibility of reallocating 4% of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid will not provide any real assistance for the sector concerned, since it represents more than 80% of the fishing fleet.
The rapporteur nevertheless takes the view that the possibility of reallocating 4% of the tonnage withdrawn with public aid will not provide any real assistance for the sector concerned, since it represents more than 80% of the fishing fleet.
In this light, 4% is a very small percentage which will have to be shared among a very large number of vessels.
In this light, 4% is a very small percentage which will have to be shared among a very large number of vessels.
According to the Community register of fishing vessels, around 132 000 GT were withdrawn with public aid in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
According to the Community register of fishing vessels, around 132 000 GT were withdrawn with public aid in 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Of this total, 112 000 GT were withdrawn by the old Member States (6.27%), with a further 20 000 GT being withdrawn since May 2004 by the new Member States (18.48%).
Of this total, 112 000 GT were withdrawn by the old Member States (6.27%), with a further 20 000 GT being withdrawn since May 2004 by the new Member States (18.48%).
4% of this is an extremely small amount, bearing in mind that it will have to be distributed among the Member States' fishing fleets.
4% of this is an extremely small amount, bearing in mind that it will have to be distributed among the Member States' fishing fleets.
For Member States which have given priority to the modernisation of the coastal fishing fleet, this possibility is negligible.
For Member States which have given priority to the modernisation of the coastal fishing fleet, this possibility is negligible.
It should be pointed out that the reduction in tonnage has been achieved largely thanks to schemes geared to the permanent cessation of fishing activities.
It should be pointed out that the reduction in tonnage has been achieved largely thanks to schemes geared to the permanent cessation of fishing activities.
The rapporteur takes the view that, given that the actual amendment does not increase the vessels’ capacity, a slight increase in the proposed percentage – 10% of the total tonnage scrapped with public aid – could improve working and hygiene conditions on board.
The rapporteur takes the view that, given that the actual amendment does not increase the vessels’ capacity, a slight increase in the proposed percentage – 10% of the total tonnage scrapped with public aid – could improve working and hygiene conditions on board.
Still more importantly, this would improve the competitiveness of the coastal fleet, which has a significant socio-economic impact on the communities concerned.
Still more importantly, this would improve the competitiveness of the coastal fleet, which has a significant socio-economic impact on the communities concerned.
Your rapporteur’s proposal does not pose any administrative or financial burden but tallies with the spirit of the political agreement.
Your rapporteur’s proposal does not pose any administrative or financial burden but tallies with the spirit of the political agreement.
In other words, the application of the new rules on fleet management is guaranteed with existing human and budgetary resources.
In other words, the application of the new rules on fleet management is guaranteed with existing human and budgetary resources.
As regards the amendment to Article 13(1)(c), a new provision is being introduced according to which the reduction in power following the replacement of an engine with public aid may not be restored.
As regards the amendment to Article 13(1)(c), a new provision is being introduced according to which the reduction in power following the replacement of an engine with public aid may not be restored.
The new provision has been added to make the new regulation compatible with the objective of fleet capacity reduction laid down in the European Fisheries Fund.
The new provision has been added to make the new regulation compatible with the objective of fleet capacity reduction laid down in the European Fisheries Fund.
Specifically, reference is made to Article 25(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006, which offers the possibility of changing the engines of fishing vessels with financial support varying according to the type of vessel: where vessels belong to the small-scale coastal fleet, i.e. if they are no more than 12 metres in length, the new engine must have the same power as the old one, whilst for larger vessels the new engine must have at least 20% less power.
Specifically, reference is made to Article 25(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006, which offers the possibility of changing the engines of fishing vessels with financial support varying according to the type of vessel: where vessels belong to the small-scale coastal fleet, i.e. if they are no more than 12 metres in length, the new engine must have the same power as the old one, whilst for larger vessels the new engine must have at least 20% less power.
The rapporteur is satisfied at the fact that stakeholders will be able to replace their vessel's engine with public aid.
The rapporteur is satisfied at the fact that stakeholders will be able to replace their vessel's engine with public aid.
He nevertheless takes the view that linking aid for replacing the engines of vessels with a length of over 12 metres to the compulsory 20% reduction in power may have repercussions on the safety of vessels and crews.
He nevertheless takes the view that linking aid for replacing the engines of vessels with a length of over 12 metres to the compulsory 20% reduction in power may have repercussions on the safety of vessels and crews.
Moreover, some fishing methods are thereby rendered virtually impossible, and this will have social and economic consequences.
Moreover, some fishing methods are thereby rendered virtually impossible, and this will have social and economic consequences.
The rapporteur notes that the common fisheries policy has introduced measures likely to reduce excess fishing capacity.
The rapporteur notes that the common fisheries policy has introduced measures likely to reduce excess fishing capacity.
This is demonstrated by the Community fishing fleet register.
This is demonstrated by the Community fishing fleet register.
In 2003, 2004 and 2005, 427 000 kW were withdrawn with public aid.
In 2003, 2004 and 2005, 427 000 kW were withdrawn with public aid.
The vast majority of the fishing capacity withdrawn – 373 000 kW – came from the Member States of the EU-15.
The vast majority of the fishing capacity withdrawn – 373 000 kW – came from the Member States of the EU-15.
The fishing capacity withdrawn by the new Member States with public aid since 2 May 2004 stood at 54 000 kW.
The fishing capacity withdrawn by the new Member States with public aid since 2 May 2004 stood at 54 000 kW.
The rapporteur agrees with the Commission that fishing fleet capacity remains at a high level by comparison with fish stocks.
The rapporteur agrees with the Commission that fishing fleet capacity remains at a high level by comparison with fish stocks.
He nevertheless insists that fishing capacity should not be reduced to the detriment of the safety of vessels and crews.
He nevertheless insists that fishing capacity should not be reduced to the detriment of the safety of vessels and crews.
Community aid must be adapted to the changing needs in the fishing industry and thereby guarantee both the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks and the long-term preservation of fishing activities.
Community aid must be adapted to the changing needs in the fishing industry and thereby guarantee both the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks and the long-term preservation of fishing activities.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s intention to provide possibilities – however limited – for modernising fishing vessels in the context of requirements relating to safety, hygiene and the improvement of working conditions on board.
The rapporteur welcomes the Commission’s intention to provide possibilities – however limited – for modernising fishing vessels in the context of requirements relating to safety, hygiene and the improvement of working conditions on board.
He nevertheless takes the view that the percentage should be revised in order to offer the coastal fishing fleet real possibilities for modernisation.
He nevertheless takes the view that the percentage should be revised in order to offer the coastal fishing fleet real possibilities for modernisation.
With regard to the amendment to Article 13, he rejects the compulsory 20% reduction in power for vessels over 12 metres in length since this would jeopardise the safety of vessels and crews, whilst rendering certain fishing methods virtually impossible, which would have economic and social consequences for the industry.
With regard to the amendment to Article 13, he rejects the compulsory 20% reduction in power for vessels over 12 metres in length since this would jeopardise the safety of vessels and crews, whilst rendering certain fishing methods virtually impossible, which would have economic and social consequences for the industry.
Опазване и устойчива експлоатация на рибните ресурси
Conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources
относно предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Директива 2002/59/ЕО относно създаване на система на Общността за контрол на движението на корабите и за информация
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/59/EC establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system
PE 374.225v02-00
PE 374.225v02-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................38
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................32
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................42
OPINION of the Committee on Fisheries ................................................................36
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2005)0589 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0589 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член80, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0004/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0004/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по транспорт и туризъм и становището на комисия по рибно стопанство ( A6‑0086/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0086/2007 ),
Съображение 5
RECITAL 5
(5) Системите за автоматично опознаване на корабите (AIS – Система за автоматично опознаване), посочени в Международната конвенция за безопасността на човешкия живот на море (SOLAS) правят възможно не само подобряването на възможностите за контрол на такива кораби, но предимно за увеличаване на тяхната безопасност в случай на близко плаване.
(5) The automatic ship identification systems (AIS – Automatic Identification System) referred to in the SOLAS Convention make it possible not only to improve the possibilities of monitoring these ships but above all to make them safer in close navigation situations.
Тези системи бяха включени в разпоредителната част на Директива 2002/59/EО.
They have accordingly been integrated into the enacting terms of Directive 2002/59/EC.
Като се има предвид, че голям брой сблъсъци с участието на риболовни кораби, които очевидно не са били забелязани от търговски кораби, или които не са забелязали търговските кораби в близост до тях, е особено желателно разширяването на обхвата на тази мярка по отношение на риболовни кораби с дължина над 15 метра.
Considering the large number of collisions involving fishing vessels that have clearly not been seen by merchant ships or which have not seen the merchant ships around them, extension of this measure to include fishing vessels with a length of more than 15 metres is very much to be desired.
Your rapporteur supports the introduction of AIS for fishing vessels to make them more easily seen, particularly by large merchant vessels.
Your rapporteur supports the introduction of AIS for fishing vessels to make them more easily seen, particularly by large merchant vessels.
However, there is a risk that AIS will be misused by competing fishing vessels to find out where others are fishing.
However, there is a risk that AIS will be misused by competing fishing vessels to find out where others are fishing.
That is not the purpose of AIS.
That is not the purpose of AIS.
In general it needs to be ensured that the data transmitted via AIS are not misused for commercial ends
In general it needs to be ensured that the data transmitted via AIS are not misused for commercial ends.
Съображение 6
RECITAL 6
(6) Полезно би било да се проучат възможните съвместни действия между AIS и системите за позициониране и комуникация, използвани в контекста на общата политика в областта на рибното стопанство, като система за контрол на плавателните съдове чрез сателит (VMS).
(6) It would be useful to study what synergies might be possible between AIS and the positioning and communication systems used in the context of the common fisheries policy, such as the satellite-based vessel monitoring system (VMS).
Проучването на възможностите за интегриране на тези системи следва да отчита нуждите и изискванията за контрол над флотите от риболовни кораби, по-специално по отношение на сигурността и поверителността на предаваните данни.
Investigation of the possibilities of integrating these systems should take account of the needs and requirements of controlling fishing fleets, particularly as regards the security and confidentiality of the data transmitted.