natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- A wider range of chemicals are subject to annual export notification.
- A wider range of chemicals are subject to annual export notification.
- PIC chemicals and chemicals that are banned or severely restricted in the Community in a Convention use category cannot be exported without the explicit consent of importing countries;
- PIC chemicals and chemicals that are banned or severely restricted in the Community in a Convention use category cannot be exported without the explicit consent of importing countries;
- Certain articles and chemicals (such those chemicals that are subject also to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants) are banned for export;
- Certain articles and chemicals (such those chemicals that are subject also to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants) are banned for export;
- All dangerous chemicals exported to third countries have to be labelled and packaged in the same way as they must be within the Community " (COM (2006) 745, page 3).
- All dangerous chemicals exported to third countries have to be labelled and packaged in the same way as they must be within the Community " (COM (2006) 745, page 3).
Technical adjustments proposed by this new regulation
Technical adjustments proposed by this new regulation
Those adjustments are based on the experience in implementing the annulled Reg.
Those adjustments are based on the experience in implementing the annulled Reg.
304/2003 and are meant to improve the functioning of the proposed proposal.
304/2003 and are meant to improve the functioning of the proposed proposal.
Your Draftswoman has the following comments to make:
Your Draftswoman has the following comments to make:
The definition of the exporter is correct and takes account of the EP concerns that the natural or legal person on whose behalf an export declaration is made and is required to notify the Designated National Authority of a Member State should be established in the said Member State (Article 3(15)).
The definition of the exporter is correct and takes account of the EP concerns that the natural or legal person on whose behalf an export declaration is made and is required to notify the Designated National Authority of a Member State should be established in the said Member State (Article 3(15)).
The definition of the preparation (i.e. a mixture or a solution composed of two or more substances) is acceptable and means compulsory labelling if required by Directive 1999/45/EC on classification, packaging and labelling (Articles 3(2) and 1(2)).
The definition of the preparation (i.e. a mixture or a solution composed of two or more substances) is acceptable and means compulsory labelling if required by Directive 1999/45/EC on classification, packaging and labelling (Articles 3(2) and 1(2)).
The explicit consent procedure under Article 13.6 of the proposal is welcomed but has caused anxiety to the EU traders.
The explicit consent procedure under Article 13.6 of the proposal is welcomed but has caused anxiety to the EU traders.
The logic of Article 13 is correct because it says that chemicals listed in part 3 of Annex I of the said proposal should not be exported without the explicit consent of the importing country.
The logic of Article 13 is correct because it says that chemicals listed in part 3 of Annex I of the said proposal should not be exported without the explicit consent of the importing country.
The same approach is applied to any chemical that is banned or restricted within the Community and qualifies for PIC notification.
The same approach is applied to any chemical that is banned or restricted within the Community and qualifies for PIC notification.
However, " In around half of the cases to date, despite the efforts made by the DNAs of the exporting Member States to obtain explicit consent, no response is forthcoming from the importing country, in some cases for many months or even years" (COM (2006) 745 page 5).
However, " In around half of the cases to date, despite the efforts made by the DNAs of the exporting Member States to obtain explicit consent, no response is forthcoming from the importing country, in some cases for many months or even years" (COM (2006) 745 page 5).
The newly proposed regulation seeks to remedy this situation via time limits imposed and temporary measures or a more flexible interpretation.
The newly proposed regulation seeks to remedy this situation via time limits imposed and temporary measures or a more flexible interpretation.
The strengthening of customs controls of exported and imported chemicals has been a constant concern in both the EU and its Member States.
The strengthening of customs controls of exported and imported chemicals has been a constant concern in both the EU and its Member States.
The role of the customs authorities of Member States is important because they are responsible for ensuring compliance with regulations of this type.
The role of the customs authorities of Member States is important because they are responsible for ensuring compliance with regulations of this type.
The proposed regulation entails in Article 17 several actions, such as classification of chemicals carrying a "code number" in their export declarations and development of the Commission's EDEXIM database.
The proposed regulation entails in Article 17 several actions, such as classification of chemicals carrying a "code number" in their export declarations and development of the Commission's EDEXIM database.
Both measures will help to bring light into the additional requirements foreseen by the EU for the PIC.
Both measures will help to bring light into the additional requirements foreseen by the EU for the PIC.
But a question remains still on the table: unclear is whether this proposed regulation would reduce the administrative burden both for customs and exporters.
But a question remains still on the table: unclear is whether this proposed regulation would reduce the administrative burden both for customs and exporters.
Logic of amendments proposed
Logic of amendments proposed
The logic for amendments is very simple: the proposed legal framework should be supported; both principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality are respected; the administrative cost should be kept to a minimum ; the level of protection for Health and Environment must be in line with existing EU legislation.
The logic for amendments is very simple: the proposed legal framework should be supported; both principles of subsidiarity and of proportionality are respected; the administrative cost should be kept to a minimum ; the level of protection for Health and Environment must be in line with existing EU legislation.
Определеният национален орган на износителя може да реши, като се консултира с Комисията, да пристъпи към износ, при условие, че след полагане на всички разумни усилия, не получи отговор на искането си за получаване на изрично съгласие по смисъла на параграф 6, буква а), в рамките на един от следните срокове:
The Designated National Authority of the exporter may, in consultation with the Commission, decide that the export may proceed if , after all reasonable efforts, no response to a request for explicit consent pursuant to paragraph 6(a) has been received within either of the following time-limits:
Определеният национален орган на износителя може да реши, като се консултира с Комисията, да пристъпи към износ, при условие, че не получи отговор на искането си за получаване на изрично съгласие по смисъла на параграф 6, буква а), в рамките на един от следните срокове:
The Designated National Authority of the exporter may, in consultation with the Commission, decide that the export may proceed if no response to a request for explicit consent pursuant to paragraph 6(a) has been received within either of the following time-limits:
The original wording is too vague since the interpretation of ‘reasonable efforts’ can vary.
The original wording is too vague since the interpretation of ‘reasonable efforts’ can vary.
Член 13, параграф 7, букви а) и б)
Article 13, paragraph 7, points (a) and (b)
a) 60 дни , при наличието на данни, получени от официални източници в страната вносител или в друга страна вносител, за това, че химическият продукт е бил лицензиран, регистриран или разрешен по време на вноса, или че наскоро е бил използван или внесен в страната вносител или в друга страна вносител и не са били предприети никакви регулаторни мерки за забрана на използването му;
(a) 60 days , where there is evidence from official sources in the importing Party or importing other country that the chemical, at the time of importation, is licensed, registered or authorised or that it has recently been used in, or imported into, the importing Party or importing other country and no regulatory action has been taken to prohibit its use;
a) 30 дни след датата на първоначалното искане , при наличието на данни, получени от официални източници в страната вносител или в друга страна вносител, за това, че химическият продукт е бил лицензиран, регистриран или разрешен по време на вноса, или че наскоро е бил използван или внесен в страната вносител или в друга страна вносител и не са били предприети никакви регулаторни мерки за забрана на използването му;
(a) 30 days after the date of the original request , where there is evidence from official sources in the importing Party or importing other country that the chemical, at the time of importation, is licensed, registered or authorised or that it has recently been used in, or imported into, the importing Party or importing other country and no regulatory action has been taken to prohibit its use;
б) 90 дни , във всички други случаи.
(b) 90 days , in all other cases.
б) 60 дни след датата на първоначалното искане , във всички други случаи.
(b) 60 days after the date of the original request , in all other cases.
It is unclear with which action the time-limit is launched.
It is unclear with which action the time-limit is launched.
Shorter time-limits facilitate trade and will help prevent European companies being put at a competitive disadvantage compared to non-European industry.
Shorter time-limits facilitate trade and will help prevent European companies being put at a competitive disadvantage compared to non-European industry.
Член 13, параграф 8, алинея 1, букви а), б) и в)
Article 13, paragraph 8, subparagraph 1, points (a), (b) and (c)
a) за всяко изрично съгласие, получено съгласно параграф 6, буква а), се изисква получаването на ново изрично съгласие до края на третата календарна година след даването на съгласието, освен когато съгласно условията за даване на това съгласие не се изисква друго;
(a) for each explicit consent obtained pursuant to paragraph 6(a) a new explicit consent shall be required by the end of the third calendar year after the consent was given, unless the terms of that consent require otherwise;
a) за всяко изрично съгласие, получено съгласно параграф 6, буква а), се изисква получаването на ново изрично съгласие до края на петата календарна година след даването на съгласието, освен когато съгласно условията за даване на това съгласие не се изисква друго;
(a) for each explicit consent obtained pursuant to paragraph 6(a) a new explicit consent shall be required by the end of the fifth calendar year after the consent was given, unless the terms of that consent require otherwise;
б) освен в случаите, когато междувременно е получен отговор на искането, всяко изключение, допуснато съгласно параграф 7, буква а), ще важи най-много за срок от две календарни години , след изтичането на който се изисква получаване на изрично съгласие;
(b) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(a) shall be for a maximum period of two calendar years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required;
б) освен в случаите, когато междувременно е получен отговор на искането, всяко изключение, допуснато съгласно параграф 7, буква а), ще важи най-много за срок от четири календарни години , след изтичането на който се изисква получаване на изрично съгласие;
(b) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(a) shall be for a maximum period of four calendar years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required;
в) освен в случаите, когато междувременно е получен отговор на искането, всяко изключение, допуснато съгласно параграф 7, буква б), ще важи най-много за срок от 12 месеца , след изтичането на който се изисква получаване на изрично съгласие;
(c) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(b) shall be for a maximum period of 12 months , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required.
в) освен в случаите, когато междувременно е получен отговор на искането, всяко изключение, допуснато съгласно параграф 7, буква б), ще важи най-много за срок от 2 години , след изтичането на който се изисква получаване на изрично съгласие;
(c) unless a response to a request has been received in the meantime, each waiver granted pursuant to paragraph 7(b) shall be for a maximum period of 2 years , upon expiry of which explicit consent shall be required.
The introduction of a periodical review leads to legal uncertainty and administrative burden.
The introduction of a periodical review leads to legal uncertainty and administrative burden.
Once an explicit consent has been obtained, its validity should not expire too quickly.
Once an explicit consent has been obtained, its validity should not expire too quickly.
Член 13, параграф 8, алинея 3)
Article 13, paragraph 8, subparagraph 3
В случая, посочен в буква в), износът не може да продължи след изтичането на съответния срок, освен ако не е получено изрично съгласие или са изпълнени условията по параграф 7, буква а), след подаване на ново искане за изрично съгласие.
In the case referred to in point (c), exports may not continue beyond the expiry of the relevant period unless explicit consent is obtained or the conditions of paragraph 7(a) are met following a new request for explicit consent.
В случая, посочен в буква в), износът не може да продължи след изтичането на съответния срок, освен ако не е получено изрично съгласие или е изпълнено някое от условията, посочени в параграф 7, буква а), след подаване на ново искане за изрично съгласие или страната вносител не е отговорила в 30-дневен срок на ново искане за изрично съгласие.
In the case referred to in point (c), exports may not continue beyond the expiry of the relevant period unless explicit consent is obtained or any of the conditions referred to in paragraph 7(a) is met following a new request for explicit consent or the importing Party has not responded within 30 days to a new request for explicit consent .
Pending a response to a request, exports should be allowed to continue.
Pending a response to a request, exports should be allowed to continue.
Otherwise European exporters are penalised for the non-action of certain countries.
Otherwise European exporters are penalised for the non-action of certain countries.
Renato Brunetta, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Radu Ţîrle, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Dominique Vlasto
Renato Brunetta, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Anne Laperrouze, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Radu Ţîrle, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras, Dominique Vlasto
Alexander Alvaro, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Manuel António dos Santos, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Erika Mann, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Alexander Alvaro, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Manuel António dos Santos, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Erika Mann, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Satu Hassi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Aldis Kušķis, Jules Maaten, Miroslav Ouzký, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Satu Hassi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Aldis Kušķis, Jules Maaten, Miroslav Ouzký, Vittorio Prodi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Glenis Willmott
Iles Braghetto, Christofer Fjellner, Radu Ţîrle
Iles Braghetto, Christofer Fjellner, Radu Ţîrle
относно предложението за регламент на Съвета относно установяването на рамка на Общността за събирането, управлението и използването на данните в сектор „рибарство“ и подкрепата за научни консултации във връзка с Общата политика в областта на рибарството
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and supporting scientific opinions on the Common Fisheries Policy
PE 393.973v02-00
PE 393.973v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................16
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................15
относно предложението за регламент на Съвета относно установяването на рамка на Общността за събирането, управлението и използването на данните в сектор „рибарство“ и подкрепата за научни консултации във връзка с Общата политика в областта на рибарството
on the proposal for a Council regulation on establishing a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and supporting scientific opinion on the Common Fisheries Policy
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0196 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0196 ),
– като взе предвид член 37 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0152/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0152/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по рибно стопанство ( A6‑0407/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0407/2007 ),
(6) Регламент ( ЕС ) № 1543/2000 на Съвета от 29 юни 2000 г. за установяване на общностна рамка за събиране и управление на данните, необходими за провеждане на общата политиката в областта на рибарството трябва да бъде преразгледан, за да се отдели дължимото внимание на подхода за управление на рибарството, основан на флотата, на необходимостта от развиване на екосистемния подход, на нуждата от подобряване на качеството, целостта и по-широкия достъп до данните , свързани с рибарството, по-ефикасната подкрепа за осигуряване на научни консултации и насърчаването на сътрудничеството между държавите-членки.
(6) Council Regulation (EC) No 1543/2000 of 29 June 2000 establishing a Community framework for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the common fisheries policy needs to be reviewed in order to take due consideration of a fleet based approach towards fisheries management, the need to develop an ecosystem approach, the need for improved quality, completeness and broader access to fisheries data, more efficient support for provision of scientific advice and the promotion of cooperation among Member States.
(6) Регламент ( ЕО ) № 1543/2000 на Съвета от 29 юни 2000 г. за установяване на общностна рамка за събиране и управление на данните, необходими за провеждане на общата политиката в областта на рибарството , трябва да бъде преразгледан, за да се отдели дължимото внимание на подхода за управление на рибарството, основан на флотата, на необходимостта от развиване на екосистемния подход, на нуждата от подобряване на качеството, целостта и по-широкия достъп до данните , свързани с рибарството, по-ефикасната подкрепа за осигуряване на научни консултации и насърчаването на сътрудничеството между държавите-членки.
(6) Council Regulation (EC) No 1543/2000 of 29 June 2000 establishing a Community framework for the collection and management of the data needed to conduct the common fisheries policy needs to be reviewed in order to take due account of a fleet-based approach towards fisheries management, the need to develop an ecosystem approach, the need for improved quality, completeness and broader access to fisheries data, more efficient support for provision of scientific advice and the promotion of cooperation among Member States.
Държавите-членки и Комисията следва да се задължат да гарантират степен на поверителност, отговаряща на обработваните данни, на характеристиките на крайния потребител и на различното национално законодателство в областта.
The Member States and the Commission should be obliged to ensure sufficient levels of confidentiality in accordance with the data concerned, the characteristics of the end-user and the national law in question.
Étant donné que la proposition de règlement donne une définition très large de la notion d'utilisateur final, à savoir toute personne physique ou morale, c'est-à-dire le public dans son ensemble, ce serait la première fois qu'un secteur économique serait tenu de divulguer toutes les données le concernant, et ce sans consultation préalable des intéressés, mais à l'avance.
In view of the very broad definition of the end-user in the proposal for a regulation (i.e. any natural or legal person ─ in other words, the general public), this would be the first time that an economic sector was obliged to make public all of its data ─ and not on request but in advance.
Il est donc nécessaire de garantir un minimum de confidentialité.
A confidentiality threshold must therefore be ensured.
(9) Задълженията, свързани с достъпа до данните обхванати в настоящия регламент не нарушават задълженията на държавите-членки по Директива 2003/4/ EC на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 28 януари 2003 г., посветена на обществения достъп до свързана с околната среда информация и отменя Директивата 90/313/EEC на Съвета във връзка с информацията за околната среда, според посоченото в член 2, параграф 1 от тази директива.
(9) The obligations concerning access to the data covered by this Regulation are without prejudice to Member States’ obligations under Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC with regard to the environmental information as defined in Article 2(1) of that Directive.