natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Оценка на въздействието на политиките на Европейската комисия: Достижения и перспективи, Европейски консултативни съвети за околна среда и устойчиво развитие, април 2006 г.
Impact Assessment of European Commission Policies: Achievements and Prospects, European Environment and Sustainable Development Advisory Councils, April 2006.
Правилно определяне на пропорциите – Докъде следва да се простират оценките на въздействието на ЕС?Институт за Miljøvurdering,, април 2006 г.
Getting Proportions Right - How far should EU impact assessments go?, Institut for Miljøvurdering, April 2006.
За по-добро или по-лошо?
For Better or for Worse?
Програма на ЕС за "по-добро регулиране" и за околна среда, Институт за европейска политика в областта на околната среда, ноември 2005 г.
The EU’s ‘Better Regulation’ Agenda and the Environment, Institute for European Environmental Policy, November 2005.
Устойчивото развитие в интегрираните оценки на въздействието на Европейската комисия за 2003 г., Институт за европейска политика в областта на околната среда, април 2004 г. , че насоките на Комисията относно оценките на въздействието не сe спазват изцяло от Генералните дирекции на Комисията, че оценката и количественото изражение на икономическите ползи имат предимство пред въздействието върху околната среда, социалната сфера и последиците в международен план, че на разходите за законодателството се придава много по-голяма тежест, отколкото на ползите, и че краткосрочните съображения вземат превес над дългосрочните; счита, че такива небалансирани оценки на въздействието водят до отрицателни последици за самата политика в областта на околната среда и включването й в други политики на ЕС; призовава Комисията да предприеме действия за отстраняване на тези съществуващи недостатъци;
Sustainable Development in the European Commission's integrated impact assessments for 2003, Institute for European Environmental Policy, April 2004. that the Commission guidelines on impact assessments are not fully respected by Commission DGs, that the assessment and quantification of economic impacts has been emphasised at the expense of environmental, social and international impacts, that the costs of legislation are assessed far more than the benefits, and that short-term considerations overshadow the long-term; considers that such unbalanced impact assessments are counterproductive with regard to environment policy itself and its integration into other EU policies; calls on the Commission to take action to rectify these persistent deficiencies;
43. призовава Комисията да задълбочи усилията си за постигане на целта да се консумират 20 % възобновяеми енергийни източници и 10 % биогорива; подчертава, че механизмът на устойчивост, който е в стадий на развитие, следва да прилага най-строги критерии за устойчивост спрямо биогорива, внасяни от трети страни;
Calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to achieve the 20% target for renewables and the 10% target for biofuel consumption; stresses that the sustainability mechanism, which is at the development stage, should apply the most stringent sustainability criteria to biofuels imported from third countries;
Принципи за по-добро регулиране на политиката в областта на околната среда
Better regulation principles in environmental policy
48. счита, че философският подход, прилаган към процеса на преразглеждане, е лишен от критична обосновка и не налага анализ на причините и основанията за това забавяне; счита, че само чрез анализ и обмисляне на причините за това забавяне могат да се предприемат правилни действия в бъдеще;
Considers that the philosophical approach applied to the revision process is devoid of critical reasoning and does not involve analysis of the reasons and grounds for the delays; believes that only by analysing and reflecting on the causes of these delays can the right moves be made in the future;
50. посочва, че са необходими нови начини за измерване на благоденствието, основани на реалистични стойности за екологичните услуги; счита, че БВП вече не представлява подходящо средство за измерване на благоденствието и развитието, тъй като не може сам по себе си да отрази всички аспекти и нужди на модерното общество; насърчава ЕС да продължава да развива и политически да използва нов показател, който интегрира отрицателното въздействие на икономическия напредък върху нашата околна среда и нашето здраве и допринася за усилията за премахване на знака за равенство между икономическия растеж и натиска упражняван върху околната среда; счита, че този нов показател следва да насърчава развитието на интегрирано общество и да дава тласък за по-добро интегриране на съображенията от областта на околната среда в други политики;
Points out that new ways to measure welfare based on realistic values for ecological services are needed; considers that GDP, as it cannot alone reflect all facets and needs of a modern society, is no longer an adequate tool to measure well-being and development; encourages the EU to further develop and make political use of a new indicator that integrates the negative impact of economic progress on our environment and health and that contributes to the effort of decoupling economic growth from the exertion of pressure on the environment; considers that this new indicator should promote the development of an integrated society and give the impetus for better integration of environmental considerations in other policies;
Mid-Term Review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
Mid-Term Review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety of the European Parliament has had an assessment made of how well the European Union has so far honoured its commitments under the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, which was approved in 2002 and runs until 2012.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety of the European Parliament has had an assessment made of how well the European Union has so far honoured its commitments under the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme, which was approved in 2002 and runs until 2012.
This assessment revealed that the implementation of the Action Programme is either very behind schedule or extremely behind schedule in the case of a number of priority objectives.
This assessment revealed that the implementation of the Action Programme is either very behind schedule or extremely behind schedule in the case of a number of priority objectives.
In the light of the measures so far carried out, it does not seem that the priority environmental objectives of the programme will be achieved by 2012.
In the light of the measures so far carried out, it does not seem that the priority environmental objectives of the programme will be achieved by 2012.
Accordingly, the assessment does not support the claim by the Commission in its own mid-term review that, on the whole, the EU is on schedule with the implementation of the measures planned in the Action Programme.
Accordingly, the assessment does not support the claim by the Commission in its own mid-term review that, on the whole, the EU is on schedule with the implementation of the measures planned in the Action Programme.
Before the Sixth Environment Action Programme was approved, there was considerable debate on how the EU-wide objectives in each priority field should be formulated.
Before the Sixth Environment Action Programme was approved, there was considerable debate on how the EU-wide objectives in each priority field should be formulated.
Parliament's rapporteur would have liked clearer quantitative and qualitative objectives and timetables to be included in the text.
Parliament's rapporteur would have liked clearer quantitative and qualitative objectives and timetables to be included in the text.
The Commission did not endorse the adoption of clear objectives and timetables.
The Commission did not endorse the adoption of clear objectives and timetables.
In its opinion, these demands would be taken into account in the thematic strategies to be adopted on the basis of the programme.
In its opinion, these demands would be taken into account in the thematic strategies to be adopted on the basis of the programme.
Regrettably, however, the thematic strategies have proved a disappointment; they contain very few specific objectives and even where they do, they will not serve to attain the objectives of the Sixth Environment Action Programme.
Regrettably, however, the thematic strategies have proved a disappointment; they contain very few specific objectives and even where they do, they will not serve to attain the objectives of the Sixth Environment Action Programme.
One example is the air quality directive, which still remains unfinished.
One example is the air quality directive, which still remains unfinished.
According to the assessment commissioned by Parliament, it may almost unequivocally be concluded that the Commission's decision to make specific proposals through the thematic strategies has not, on the whole, produced the result hoped for.
According to the assessment commissioned by Parliament, it may almost unequivocally be concluded that the Commission's decision to make specific proposals through the thematic strategies has not, on the whole, produced the result hoped for.
Although they may be considered to have improved the participation of stakeholders and developed the strategic dimension of environmental policy, they have at the same time prolonged the environmental legislative process by delaying the drafting and adoption of specific legislative proposals.
Although they may be considered to have improved the participation of stakeholders and developed the strategic dimension of environmental policy, they have at the same time prolonged the environmental legislative process by delaying the drafting and adoption of specific legislative proposals.
The greatest progress has been made in those subsections of the Environment Action Programme concerning which no separate thematic strategies were drafted.
The greatest progress has been made in those subsections of the Environment Action Programme concerning which no separate thematic strategies were drafted.
With regard to international climate commitments, for instance, the EU can be said to have succeeded in its action so far.
With regard to international climate commitments, for instance, the EU can be said to have succeeded in its action so far.
The Sixth Environment Action Programme provides encouragement for altering support systems which have a substantial adverse impact on the environment and for promoting sustainable production methods and consumption models by fiscal means.
The Sixth Environment Action Programme provides encouragement for altering support systems which have a substantial adverse impact on the environment and for promoting sustainable production methods and consumption models by fiscal means.
Unfortunately only little progress has been made in these areas, although more effective use of market-based instruments would have a strong impact on the attainment of the objectives of the Sixth EAP.
Unfortunately only little progress has been made in these areas, although more effective use of market-based instruments would have a strong impact on the attainment of the objectives of the Sixth EAP.
Efforts should also continue to fill the gaps in environmental legislation by means of new legislative proposals and the appropriate resources should be provided to ensure that the Community's environmental legislation is implemented properly in every Member State.
Efforts should also continue to fill the gaps in environmental legislation by means of new legislative proposals and the appropriate resources should be provided to ensure that the Community's environmental legislation is implemented properly in every Member State.
Finally, it should be recalled that, unlike its predecessor, the Sixth EAP was adopted under codecision pursuant to Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
Finally, it should be recalled that, unlike its predecessor, the Sixth EAP was adopted under codecision pursuant to Article 251 of the EC Treaty.
It is also more important than before that the EU should do everything in its power to attain the objectives agreed in the Sixth EAP.
It is also more important than before that the EU should do everything in its power to attain the objectives agreed in the Sixth EAP.
Failure to attain them would damage the EU's credibility, inter alia in the eyes of members of the public who are concerned about the deterioration in the state of the environment.
Failure to attain them would damage the EU's credibility, inter alia in the eyes of members of the public who are concerned about the deterioration in the state of the environment.
относно междинния преглед на изпълнението на Шестата програма на Общността за действие в областта на околната среда
on the Mid-term review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
Комисията по международна търговия приканва водещата комисия по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on International Trade calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
8. призовава Комисията да задълбочи усилията си за постигане на целта да се консумират 20 % възобновяеми енергийни източници и 10 % биогорива; подчертава, че механизмът на устойчивост, който е в стадий на развитие, следва да прилага най-строги критерии за устойчивост спрямо биогорива, внасяни от трети страни;
Calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to achieve the 20% target for renewables and the 10% target for biofuel consumption; stresses that the sustainability mechanism, which is at the development stage, should apply the most stringent sustainability criteria to biofuels imported from third countries;
Francisco Assis, Graham Booth, Daniel Caspary, Christofer Fjellner, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jacky Hénin, Syed Kamall, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Caroline Lucas, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Vural Öger, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Iuliu Winkler, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Francisco Assis, Graham Booth, Daniel Caspary, Christofer Fjellner, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jacky Hénin, Syed Kamall, Sajjad Karim, Alain Lipietz, Caroline Lucas, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Vural Öger, Georgios Papastamkos, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Iuliu Winkler, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean-Pierre Audy, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Zbigniew Zaleski
Stavros Arnaoutakis, Jean-Pierre Audy, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Zbigniew Zaleski
относно междинния преглед на изпълнението на Шестата програма за действие на Общността в областта на околната среда
on the Mid-term review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme
Докладчик по становище: Румяна Желева
Draftswoman: Rumiana Jeleva
Комисията по регионално развитие приканва водещата комисия по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
4. призовава за засилено сътрудничество на равнище на Общността в областта на предотвратяването на бедствия, както това е изложено в Шестото споразумение за икономическо партньорство (СИП); призовава за създаване на европейски сили, които да са в състояние да реагират незабавно в случай на спешност, както предлага в своя доклад членът на Европейската комисия г-н Barnier, и изразява съжаление относно бездействието и липсата на последващи действия по този въпрос; в този контекст изтъква необходимостта от продължаване на развиването на способност за бързо реагиране, основана на структурите на гражданската защита на държавите-членки, съгласно пълномощията, предоставени от Европейския съвет през м. юни 2006; насърчава Комисията да включи предотвратяването на бедствия като една от своите цели при разглеждането на въпроса за промените на климата;
4 Calls for increased cooperation at Community level in the field of disaster prevention, as outlined in the Sixth EPA; calls for the establishment of a European emergency response unit, as proposed in the report by Commissioner Barnier, and deplores the inertia and lack of follow-up in this area; in this connection, stresses the need to continue to develop a rapid response capacity based on the Member States’ civil protection units, in line with the mandate given by the European Council of June 2006; encourages the Commission to include disaster prevention as one of its objectives when addressing the issue of climate change;
7. изтъква необходимостта от включване на програмата „Натура 2000“ в плановете за регионално развитие по такъв начин, че принципът за опазване на биологичното разнообразие на Европа да се съгласува с възможността за развитие и подобрение на благосъстоянието на населението; по този въпрос е необходима широка информационна кампания и насърчаване на добрите практики, които показват по какъв начин могат да бъдат съгласувани тези, на пръв поглед противоположни, подходи;
7 Points to the need for regional development plans to take into account the Natura 2000 programme, so as to reconcile the principle of protecting Europe’s biodiversity with the development and improvement of quality of life; with this in view, believes that a wide-ranging information campaign is needed, together with the promotion of good practice, to demonstrate how these two apparently contradictory goals can be reconciled;
8. подчертава необходимостта от по-добре координирани мрежи от регионални и местни участници, с цел разпространяване на най-добри практики в по-малко развитите региони и тяхното прилагане; подкрепя насърчаването на трансграничното сътрудничество в областта на околната среда както между държавите-членки, така и със страни и региони, граничещи с ЕС, като например регионите на Черно, Балтийско и Средиземно море, именно с цел да се предотврати трансграничното замърсяване;
8 Emphasises the need for better coordinated networks of regional and local actors in order to disseminate best practices to less developed regions and implement them; supports the promotion of cross-border environmental cooperation, both among Member States and with countries and regions neighbouring the EU, such as the regions of the Black Sea and Baltic Sea as well as the Mediterranean, particularly with the aim of preventing cross-border pollution;
9. припомня, че инвестирането в новаторски, екологосъобразни технологии и екологично проектиране, ефикасност при крайното изразходване на енергия и енергийна ефективност на сградите е много ползотворно в дългосрочен план, въпреки възможните краткосрочни високи разходи, и подчертава необходимостта от това регионите да насърчават дружествата да се възползват в пълна степен от подобни инвестиции;
9 Recalls that investing in innovative, environmentally friendly technologies and in eco-design, energy end-use efficiency and energy performance of buildings is very beneficial in the long term, despite possible short-term high costs, and emphasises the need for regions to encourage companies to take full advantage of such investments;
10. насърчава държавите-членки и техните регионални и местни органи да се възползват оптимално от новите възможности за инвестиции, предоставени от структурните фондове и новите европейски програми за добросъседство, и да гарантират, че техните оперативни програми допринасят за по-доброто прилагане на законодателството на Общността в областта на околната среда и дългосрочната цел за устойчиво развитие в целия ЕС, в съответствие с останалите тематични приоритети;
10 Encourages the Member States and their regional and local authorities to make optimal use of the new investment opportunities provided by the Structural Funds and the New European Neighbourhood Policy Programmes and to ensure that their Operational Programmes contribute to improved implementation of Community environmental legislation and the long-term goal of EU-wide sustainable development in a way consistent with the other thematic priorities;
11. призовава, по-специално, държавите-членки да гарантират, че проектите, финансирани от структурните фондове са в съгласие с целта за опазване и подобряване на околната среда, както е посочено в член 17 от Регламент (ЕО) № 1083/2006 на Съвета от 11 юли 2006 г. относно определянето на общи разпоредби за Европейския регионален фонд, Европейския социален фонд и Кохезионния фонд
11 Calls, in particular, on Member States to ensure that projects supported by Structural Funds are consonant with the goal of protecting and improving the environment as specified in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund
12. призовава Комисията да подпомага националните, регионални и местни органи при ангажирането им със съвместни устойчиви обществени поръчки чрез предоставяне на ясна рамка за улесняване на определянето на измерими цели и критерии за качество;
12 Calls on the Commission to assist national, regional and local authorities to engage in joint sustainable procurements by providing a clear framework to facilitate the definition of measurable objectives and quality criteria;
Alfonso Andria, Emmanouil Angelakas, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Bairbre De Brún, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Marian Harkin, Jim Higgins, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Alfonso Andria, Emmanouil Angelakas, Elspeth Attwooll, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Bairbre De Brún, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Ambroise Guellec, Pedro Guerreiro, Zita Gurmai, Marian Harkin, Jim Higgins, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Margie Sudre, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Peter Baco, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Jill Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Christa Prets, Miloslav Ransdorf, Czesław Adam Siekierski, László Surján
Peter Baco, Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Jill Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Christa Prets, Miloslav Ransdorf, Czesław Adam Siekierski, László Surján
относно междинен преглед на изпълнението на Шестата програма за действие на Общността в областта на околната среда
on the mid-term review of the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme