natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The only instance whereby the regulatory procedure with scrutiny will not apply cannot be considered to be a measure of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the Regulation or to supplement it since it only concerns decisions on "format" and "transmission" of data.
The only instance whereby the regulatory procedure with scrutiny will not apply cannot be considered to be a measure of general scope designed to amend non-essential elements of the Regulation or to supplement it since it only concerns decisions on "format" and "transmission" of data.
For this reason, there are no strong arguments for a further use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny procedure in the above mentioned Regulation.
For this reason, there are no strong arguments for a further use of the regulatory procedure with scrutiny procedure in the above mentioned Regulation.
Therefore, it is the opinion of the International Trade Committee that no amendments to the Omnibus proposal are required in this regard.
Therefore, it is the opinion of the International Trade Committee that no amendments to the Omnibus proposal are required in this regard.
Helmuth MARKOV
Helmuth MARKOV
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS
ASP 12E258
ASP 12E258
Dear Rapporteur,
Dear Rapporteur,
The Economic and monetary affairs committee (ECON) has looked at the three first "omnibus proposals
The Economic and monetary affairs committee (ECON) has looked at the three first "omnibus proposals
We have noted that only the first text ( COM(2007)0741 ) deals with some of our competencies in the points 5.1 and 5.8.
We have noted that only the first text ( COM(2007)0741 ) deals with some of our competencies in the points 5.1 and 5.8.
Point 5.1 Council regulation (EEC) No 696/93 of 15 March 1993 on statistical units for the observation and analysis of the production system in the Community
Point 5.1 Council regulation (EEC) No 696/93 of 15 March 1993 on statistical units for the observation and analysis of the production system in the Community
In general the proposal appears to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC.
In general the proposal appears to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC.
More precisely the proposal does the necessary adaptation by replacing the management procedure with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in Article 6 concerning the adaptation of annexes.
More precisely the proposal does the necessary adaptation by replacing the management procedure with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in Article 6 concerning the adaptation of annexes.
The scope of the power in Article 5 is not entirely clear and should in an ideal situation be clarified in order to make sure no amendment of any elements of the basic acts are modified.
The scope of the power in Article 5 is not entirely clear and should in an ideal situation be clarified in order to make sure no amendment of any elements of the basic acts are modified.
However, in view of the very strict deadlines applicable to the present proposal, this does not seem indispensable.
However, in view of the very strict deadlines applicable to the present proposal, this does not seem indispensable.
Point 5.8 regulation (EC) No 1161/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 on the compilation of quarterly non-financial accounts by institutional sector
Point 5.8 regulation (EC) No 1161/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 on the compilation of quarterly non-financial accounts by institutional sector
In this case also, the proposal seems to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC with the notable exception of Article 7.
In this case also, the proposal seems to be compatible with Decision 1999/468/EC as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC with the notable exception of Article 7.
Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1) all contain provisions that would modify the obligations of the member States under the Regulation, constituting non essential elements of the basic instrument.
Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1) all contain provisions that would modify the obligations of the member States under the Regulation, constituting non essential elements of the basic instrument.
The regulatory procedure with scrutiny is thus justified.
The regulatory procedure with scrutiny is thus justified.
It is proposed that the power conferred on the Commission in Article 3(4) remain under the (normal) regulatory procedure.
It is proposed that the power conferred on the Commission in Article 3(4) remain under the (normal) regulatory procedure.
This power allows certain derogations for a limited time to the obligations of the Member States if national statistical systems require major adaptation.
This power allows certain derogations for a limited time to the obligations of the Member States if national statistical systems require major adaptation.
The measures allowed are thus temporary and transitional.
The measures allowed are thus temporary and transitional.
On this basis it is possible to argue that they do not modify any non essential element in the sense of Article 2(2) of Decision 1999/468/EC.
On this basis it is possible to argue that they do not modify any non essential element in the sense of Article 2(2) of Decision 1999/468/EC.
However, a mistake appears to have been made in respect of Article 7 of regulation (EC) 1161/2005.
However, a mistake appears to have been made in respect of Article 7 of regulation (EC) 1161/2005.
This Article is not modified at all as the proposal stands.
This Article is not modified at all as the proposal stands.
This article refers a second time to the powers already conferred in Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1).
This article refers a second time to the powers already conferred in Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1).
It could therefore seem to be superfluous.
It could therefore seem to be superfluous.
More important is to note that Article 7 submits these powers to Article 8(2) which refers to the (normal) regulatory procedure.
More important is to note that Article 7 submits these powers to Article 8(2) which refers to the (normal) regulatory procedure.
The fact that this provision is not modified thus leads to a contradiction with Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1), which submit the same powers to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
The fact that this provision is not modified thus leads to a contradiction with Articles 2(2), 2(4), 3(3) and 6(1), which submit the same powers to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny.
It can be added that Article 7 does not refer to the power of Article 3(4), which indeed is proposed to remain under the normal regulatory procedure.
It can be added that Article 7 does not refer to the power of Article 3(4), which indeed is proposed to remain under the normal regulatory procedure.
Article 7 should be deleted.
Article 7 should be deleted.
If that would not be agreed upon, it is indispensable to at least change the reference in Article 7 from Article 8(2) to Article 8(3).
If that would not be agreed upon, it is indispensable to at least change the reference in Article 7 from Article 8(2) to Article 8(3).
We consequently request your committee to introduce an amendment deleting article 7.
We consequently request your committee to introduce an amendment deleting article 7.
I am obviously available to further discuss the issue with you.
I am obviously available to further discuss the issue with you.
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS
Mr Giuseppe GARGANI
Mr Giuseppe GARGANI
26 February 2008
26 February 2008
Opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny(COM(2007) 741 final – 2007/0262 (COD))
Opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs for the Committee on Legal Affairs on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny( COM(2007) 741 final – 2007/0262 (COD))
On 15 January 2008, the President announced in plenary that he had received the above Commission proposal.
On 15 January 2008, the President announced in plenary that he had received the above Commission proposal.
The proposal as a whole was referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, while our Committee on Employment and Social Affairs was asked to deliver an opinion on the following parts of the Annex: point 2.1, point 2.2, point 2.3, point 2.4, point 2.5 point 2.6 and point 5.4.
The proposal as a whole was referred to the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, while our Committee on Employment and Social Affairs was asked to deliver an opinion on the following parts of the Annex: point 2.1, point 2.2, point 2.3, point 2.4, point 2.5 point 2.6 and point 5.4.
These points of the Annex to the Commission proposal relate to the adjustment of the following legislative instruments:
These points of the Annex to the Commission proposal relate to the adjustment of the following legislative instruments:
Annex 2.1: Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work;
Annex 2.1: Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work;
Annex 2.2 : Council Directive 92/29/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels;
Annex 2.2 : Council Directive 92/29/EEC of 31 March 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels;
Annex 2.3 : Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration) (sixteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.3 : Directive 2002/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration) (sixteenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.4: Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) (Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.4: Directive 2003/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 February 2003 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise) (Seventeenth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.5: Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.5: Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (18th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.6: Directive 2006/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 2.6: Directive 2006/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents (artificial optical radiation) (19th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC);
Annex 5.4: Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC).
Annex 5.4: Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 concerning Community statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC).
On 23 January 2008, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs appointed the undersigned, its chairman, as draftsman of the opinion.
On 23 January 2008, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs appointed the undersigned, its chairman, as draftsman of the opinion.
In accordance with the decisions of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2007 and the Conference of Committee Chairmen of 15 January 2008, a coordination meeting of the committees concerned took place on 31 January 2008.
In accordance with the decisions of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2007 and the Conference of Committee Chairmen of 15 January 2008, a coordination meeting of the committees concerned took place on 31 January 2008.
In the course of that meeting, most of the committees agreed to deliver their respective opinions in the form of a letter.
In the course of that meeting, most of the committees agreed to deliver their respective opinions in the form of a letter.
On 26 February 2008, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, on the basis of that agreement, considered the points of the Annex to the Commission proposal listed above.
On 26 February 2008, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, on the basis of that agreement, considered the points of the Annex to the Commission proposal listed above.
Our committee considers that:
Our committee considers that:
1. the Commission proposal accords with the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (OJ C 255 of 21 October 2006) on Decision 2006/512/EC and adjusts the basic instruments in accordance with the applicable procedures,
1. the Commission proposal accords with the joint statement of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (OJ C 255 of 21 October 2006) on Decision 2006/512/EC and adjusts the basic instruments in accordance with the applicable procedures,
2. the changes in question relate solely to comitology procedures.
2. the changes in question relate solely to comitology procedures.
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs decided by 41 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs decided by 41 votes to 1, with 0 abstentions
The following members were present for the vote: Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark; Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Roger Helmer; Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jean Lambert, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Elisabeth Morin, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Rovana Plumb, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Gabriele Stauner, Anne Van Lancker; Gabriele Zimmer.
The following members were present for the vote: Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark; Luigi Cocilovo, Jean Louis Cottigny, Proinsias De Rossa, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Roger Helmer; Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Jean Lambert, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Elisabeth Morin, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Rovana Plumb, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, José Albino Silva Peneda, Gabriele Stauner, Anne Van Lancker; Gabriele Zimmer.
The following substitute members were present for the vote: Mihael Brejc, Corina Creţu, Petru Filip, Donata Gottardi, Rumiana Jeleva, Jamila Madeira , to adopt the present OPINION in letter form and ask the Committee on Legal Affairs to approve without amendment those points of the Commission proposal on which it had been asked for its opinion.
The following substitute members were present for the vote: Mihael Brejc, Corina Creţu, Petru Filip, Donata Gottardi, Rumiana Jeleva, Jamila Madeira , to adopt the present OPINION in letter form and ask the Committee on Legal Affairs to approve without amendment those points of the Commission proposal on which it had been asked for its opinion.
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny – Part One
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny – Part One
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose approval of the Commission proposal.
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible, to propose approval of the Commission proposal.
Adaptation of certain acts in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC - Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (Part One)
Adaptation of certain acts in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC - Adaptation to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (Part One)
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marios Matsakis, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Karin Scheele, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Caroline Jackson, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marios Matsakis, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Karin Scheele, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Iles Braghetto, Bairbre de Brún, Jutta Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Iles Braghetto, Bairbre de Brún, Jutta Haug, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Lambert van Nistelrooij
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY
LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY
ASP 9 E 206
ASP 9 E 206
Subject: Proposals for Regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny ( COM(2007)0741 , "omnibus I"), ( COM(2007)0824 , "omnibus II"), ( COM(2008)0071 final , "omnibus IV").
Subject: Proposals for Regulations of the European Parliament and of the Council adapting a number of instruments subject to the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty to Council Decision 1999/468/EC, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC, with regard to the regulatory procedure with scrutiny ( COM(2007)0741 , "omnibus I"), ( COM(2007)0824 , "omnibus II"), ( COM(2008)0071 final , "omnibus IV").
Dear Mr Gargani, dear Mr Szájer,
Dear Mr Gargani, dear Mr Szájer,
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) has scrutinized the instruments pertaining to its fields of competence included in the above mentioned proposals.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE) has scrutinized the instruments pertaining to its fields of competence included in the above mentioned proposals.
Having consulted the coordinators, I provide you in the form of the attached tables the opinion of ITRE on the alignment proposals.
Having consulted the coordinators, I provide you in the form of the attached tables the opinion of ITRE on the alignment proposals.
After careful examination we have concluded that three instruments (Regulation 733/2002 on the .eu Top Level Domain, Council Regulation 3924/91 establishing a survey on industrial production and Directive 1999/5/EC on radio and telecommunications terminal equipment) are not correctly aligned, and that a fourth instrument (Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration) requires a technical adaptation.
After careful examination we have concluded that three instruments (Regulation 733/2002 on the .eu Top Level Domain, Council Regulation 3924/91 establishing a survey on industrial production and Directive 1999/5/EC on radio and telecommunications terminal equipment) are not correctly aligned, and that a fourth instrument (Directive 2004/8/EC on the promotion of cogeneration) requires a technical adaptation.
Furthermore, the review of the acquis communautaire in the field of telecommunications has revealed that the Radio Spectrum Decision 676/2002/EC (harmonisation measures in the field of spectrum) has been omitted by the Commission in its proposals for alignment.
Furthermore, the review of the acquis communautaire in the field of telecommunications has revealed that the Radio Spectrum Decision 676/2002/EC (harmonisation measures in the field of spectrum) has been omitted by the Commission in its proposals for alignment.
We agree with the rapporteur's approach to group all the omitted acts and under Rule 39 request the Commission to submit further legislative proposals to align these instruments.
We agree with the rapporteur's approach to group all the omitted acts and under Rule 39 request the Commission to submit further legislative proposals to align these instruments.
C/c: Mr Szájer
C/c: Mr Szájer
Encl.: table omnibus1, table omnibus 2, table omnibus 4.
Encl.: table omnibus1, table omnibus 2, table omnibus 4.
Committee: ITRE draftsperson: Angelika Niebler (Chairwoman), administrator: Julio Guzmán
Committee: ITRE draftsperson: Angelika Niebler (Chairwoman), administrator: Julio Guzmán
Basic acts to be aligned
Basic acts to be aligned
Observations JURI Committee Secretariat
Observations JURI Committee Secretariat
Observations ITRE Committee Secretariat
Observations ITRE Committee Secretariat