natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
относно Зелената книга за преразглеждане на достиженията на правото на Общността за защита на потребителите
on Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
Комисията по правни въпроси приканва водещата комисия по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите да включи в предложението за резолюция, което ще приеме, следните предложения:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Приветства Зелената книга на Комисията за преразглеждане на достиженията на правото на Общността за защита на потребителите, по-специално заявената цел за модернизиране, опростяване и усъвършенстване на нормативната среда както за професионалистите, така и за потребителите;
Welcomes the Commission's Green Paper on Review of the Consumer Acquis, particularly the stated goal of modernising, simplifying and improving the regulatory regime for professionals and consumers;
Настоява настоящото преразглеждане, което се занимава с потребителските договори, и работата върху договорното право като цяло в рамките на продължаващия процес за постигане на общата референтна рамка на европейско договорно право (ДРР), да бъдат свързани; следователно подчертава, че е необходимо настоящото преразглеждане и работата по общата референтна рамка да напредват като взаимно се допълват, като същевременно потвърждава, че постигането на тази свързаност не бива да възпрепятства или забавя текущия процес на преразглеждане;
Insists on the linkage between that Review, which will deal with consumer contracts, and the work being carried out on all contract law in general within the continuing process to achieve a Frame of Reference in European contract law (CFR), and therefore stresses that the Review and the work on the CFR need to progress in a complementary way, whilst acknowledging that achieving this linkage should not impede or delay the current Review process;
Счита, че е от съществено значение наличието на ясна цялостна визия за това, как отделните аспекти на правната и нормативна среда, които засягат дейностите във връзка с потребителското и търговско право, си взаимодействат на равнище ЕС и функционират заедно, по-специално връзката между инструментите, създадени от настоящото преразглеждане, инструментите, които се занимават с правилата относно стълкновението на закони (Рим I и Рим II), както и инструментите, основани на принципа на страната на произход (като например Директива 2000/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 8 юни 2000 г. относно някои правни аспекти на услугите на информационното общество, и по-специално на електронната търговия на вътрешния пазар
Believes that it is essential to have a clear overall vision of how the various legal and regulatory regimes affecting consumer and commercial law activities at EU level interact and function together, especially the relationship between any instrument produced by the Review and those dealing with conflict-of-law rules (Rome I and Rome II) and others based on the country-of-origin principle (e.g. Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market
Посочва, че хармонизирането трябва да доведе до съпоставимо равнище на защита на потребителите във всички държави-членки, без ненужно да се хармонизират всички национални мерки;
Points out that harmonisation should lead to a comparable level of consumer protection in all Member States without unnecessarily harmonising all national arrangements;
Предлага секторните директиви да бъдат основани на принципа на минимално хармонизиране, без да се изключва възможността за целева пълна хармонизация при спазване на някои конкретни разпоредби;
Suggests that the sectoral directives should be based on the principle of minimum harmonisation, without ruling out the possibility of targeted full harmonisation with respect to certain clear-cut provisions;
Приветства предложението на Комисията за хоризонтален инструмент и потвърждава възможните предимства на една, както някои бяха я определили, основна директива за „правата на потребителя“; остава загрижен относно равнището на максимална хармонизация, до което би могло да доведе един такъв подход, и възможността да последва загуба на някои национални права;
Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a horizontal instrument and acknowledges the possible advantages of what some have termed a basic ‘Consumer Rights’ Directive; remains concerned at the level of maximum harmonisation any such approach might lead to and the possible resultant loss of certain national rights;
Предлага някои от секторните разпоредби на хоризонталния инструмент да се основават на принципа на целевата пълна хармонизация, за да се осигури правно сближаване;
Suggests that cross-cutting provisions of the horizontal instrument should be based on the principle of targeted full harmonisation, in order to ensure legal coherence;
Препоръчва по отношение на нехармонизираните сектори в координираната област да бъде приложен принципът на вътрешния пазар за взаимно признаване чрез включване на клауза за вътрешния пазар; тази клауза за вътрешния пазар би позволила прилагането на правото на стопанския субект в случай, че приложимото право за защита на потребителите предвижда по-строги правила и налага неоснователни пречки пред вътрешния пазар, като под неоснователни пречки се разбират такива пречки, които не могат да бъдат обосновани с доводи във връзка с обществения ред и сигурността, защитата на общественото здраве или опазването на околната среда; заявява, че по отношение на тези сектори, които не попадат в обхвата на координираната област, потребителите ще се ползват от задължителните разпоредби на законодателството в държавата на тяхното обичайно пребиваване, както се предвижда по-специално от Римската конвенция от 19 юни 1980 г. относно приложимото право при договорни задължения;
Recommends, as regards the non-harmonised areas in the coordinated field, application of the internal market principle of mutual recognition by the inclusion of an internal market clause; this internal market clause would allow for the application of the law of the economic operator if the applicable consumer law lays down stricter rules and imposes an unjustified barrier to the internal market, an unjustified barrier being one that is not justified by reasons of public policy and public security, the protection of public health or the protection of the environment; states that, for those areas that do not fall within the coordinated field, consumers will benefit from the mandatory provisions of the legislation of their habitual residence as provided for, in particular, by the Rome Convention of 19 June 1980 on the law applicable to contractual obligations;
Отбелязва, че в Приложение 1 на Зелената книга, точки 4 и 5, се съдържа подробен списък на правни договорни въпроси, свързани с потребителските договори, че някои от тези въпроси вече са били част от работата по общата референтна рамка и, че много от тях имат силно „политически“ характер, при което всяко общо правило, което цели да създаде хармонизиран инструмент на равнище ЕС, задължително би изисквало задълбочен (включително обществен) дебат и обсъждане;
Notes that Annex 1 of the Green Paper contains at points 4 and 5 an extensive list of legal contractual issues relevant to consumer contracts, that some of those issues have already formed part of the work on the CFR and that many are of a highly ‘political’ nature where were any general rule to form part of a harmonised instrument at EU level, there would need to be extensive (including public) debate and consideration;
Счита, че както доверието на потребителите, така и трансграничната търговия, могат да бъдат подпомогнати посредством разработването на система за „син флаг“, която да позволява на страните да избират от няколко възможни стандартни търговски правила и условия, одобрени на равнище ЕС и, че е възможно да се насочат повече усилия към подобни практични решения;
Considers that both consumer confidence and cross-border trade could be assisted by the development of a ‘blue flag’ system allowing parties to opt for one of a number of possible EU-approved standard terms and conditions of business, and that more effort could be directed towards such practical solutions.
Относно Зелената книга за преразглеждане на достиженията на правото на Общността за защита на потребителите
Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
Livre vert sur la révision de l'acquis communautaire en matière de protection des consommateurs
on the Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis
IMCO 18.1.2007
IMCO 18.1.2007
ITRE 12.7.2007
ITRE 12.7.2007
ITRE 6.3.2007
ITRE 6.3.2007
Béatrice Patrie 19.12.2006
Béatrice Patrie 19.12.2006
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Gabriela Creţu, Rosa Díez González, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Arlene McCarthy, Toine Manders, Nickolay Mladenov, Bill Newton Dunn, Béatrice Patrie, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Alexander Stubb, Eva-Britt Svensson, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Nicola Zingaretti
Charlotte Cederschiöld, Gabriela Creţu, Rosa Díez González, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Edit Herczog, Pierre Jonckheer, Kurt Lechner, Arlene McCarthy, Toine Manders, Nickolay Mladenov, Bill Newton Dunn, Béatrice Patrie, Zita Pleštinská, Zuzana Roithová, Luisa Fernanda Rudi Ubeda, Heide Rühle, Leopold Józef Rutowicz, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Alexander Stubb, Eva-Britt Svensson, Horia-Victor Toma, Jacques Toubon, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler, Nicola Zingaretti
Suppléant(s) présent(s) au moment du vote final
Substitutes(s) present for the final vote
Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, John Purvis
Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, John Purvis
PE 386.530v02-00
PE 386.530v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Съвета ( COM(2007)0058 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0058 ),
Все още непубликувано в ОВ. ,
Not yet published in OJ.
– като взе предвид член 37 от Договора за Европейската общност, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0083/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0083/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони ( A6‑0282/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0282/2007 ),
The European Commission
The European Commission
The Commission proposal confines itself to amending Annex I to Directive 2001/114/EC.
The Commission proposal confines itself to amending Annex I to Directive 2001/114/EC.
The Commission proposes allowing standardisation of protein content in the Community and bringing it into line with the standard of the Codex Alimentarius (a minimum protein content of 34%, expressed in fat-free dry matter).
The Commission proposes allowing standardisation of protein content in the Community and bringing it into line with the standard of the Codex Alimentarius (a minimum protein content of 34%, expressed in fat-free dry matter).
Standardisation of protein content is not currently allowed.
Standardisation of protein content is not currently allowed.
The natural protein content of collected milk must be maintained in preserved milk.
The natural protein content of collected milk must be maintained in preserved milk.
The natural protein content of milk powder is currently between 31 and 37%.
The natural protein content of milk powder is currently between 31 and 37%.
The European milk industry and exporters of milk powder and condensed milk (‘preserved milk’ means milk powder and condensed milk) have long been calling for the Community rules on protein content for these products to be brought into line with international standards (Codex).
The European milk industry and exporters of milk powder and condensed milk (‘preserved milk’ means milk powder and condensed milk) have long been calling for the Community rules on protein content for these products to be brought into line with international standards (Codex).
The proposed authorisation of standardisation at a minimum protein content of 34% expressed in fat-free dry matter makes it possible for European manufacturers to compete with manufacturers in third countries under the same conditions.
The proposed authorisation of standardisation at a minimum protein content of 34% expressed in fat-free dry matter makes it possible for European manufacturers to compete with manufacturers in third countries under the same conditions.
Competitors from third countries are already allowed to produce in accordance with the Codex rules, putting them at an economic advantage.
Competitors from third countries are already allowed to produce in accordance with the Codex rules, putting them at an economic advantage.
The intervention price for skimmed milk powder (SMP) is currently based on a protein content of 35.6%.
The intervention price for skimmed milk powder (SMP) is currently based on a protein content of 35.6%.
The Commission now proposes aligning the intervention standard with the value for protein standardisation of 34%, which will inevitably bring adjustments of the intervention price for SMP in its wake.
The Commission now proposes aligning the intervention standard with the value for protein standardisation of 34%, which will inevitably bring adjustments of the intervention price for SMP in its wake.
The proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP is part of the proposal to amend the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999), which is the subject of a separate European Parliament report.
The proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP is part of the proposal to amend the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999), which is the subject of a separate European Parliament report.
The European Commission expects standardisation at 34% to mean that significant quantities of protein will come onto the EU market.
The European Commission expects standardisation at 34% to mean that significant quantities of protein will come onto the EU market.
The Commission expects, in view of the high demand, that the increased availability will not lead to significant, if any, additional costs for the Community.
The Commission expects, in view of the high demand, that the increased availability will not lead to significant, if any, additional costs for the Community.
Standardisation of preserved milk coupled with a lowering of the intervention price for SMP will probably lead to a slight increase in SMP production, while the bulk of the supplementary quantity of proteins obtained through standardisation will be absorbed by increased production of cheese and fresh dairy products.
Standardisation of preserved milk coupled with a lowering of the intervention price for SMP will probably lead to a slight increase in SMP production, while the bulk of the supplementary quantity of proteins obtained through standardisation will be absorbed by increased production of cheese and fresh dairy products.
The Commission expects, in turn, that that increase will generate a higher fat use in those products and correspondingly lower butter production and butter exports.
The Commission expects, in turn, that that increase will generate a higher fat use in those products and correspondingly lower butter production and butter exports.
In the view of the European Commission, the lowering of the intervention price for SMP by 28% as of 2008 and the expected lower expenditure on butter exports will lead to budgetary savings.
In the view of the European Commission, the lowering of the intervention price for SMP by 28% as of 2008 and the expected lower expenditure on butter exports will lead to budgetary savings.
All in all, the European Commission expects that the standardisation will lead to budget economies of EUR 19.55 million as an annual average for the years 2008-2013 (EUR 117.3 million in total).
All in all, the European Commission expects that the standardisation will lead to budget economies of EUR 19.55 million as an annual average for the years 2008-2013 (EUR 117.3 million in total).
Rapporteur’s position and conclusions
Rapporteur’s position and conclusions
The rapporteur welcomes the standardisation of protein content, since it offers European manufacturers the chance to compete on an equal footing with imported products, as well as simplifying international trade.
The rapporteur welcomes the standardisation of protein content, since it offers European manufacturers the chance to compete on an equal footing with imported products, as well as simplifying international trade.
The rapporteur therefore supports the Commission’s proposal, suggesting no further amendments.
The rapporteur therefore supports the Commission’s proposal, suggesting no further amendments.
It must, however, be stressed that the related proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP (proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products) will be the subject of a separate report by the European Parliament.
It must, however, be stressed that the related proposal to lower the intervention price for SMP (proposal for a Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products) will be the subject of a separate report by the European Parliament.
The rapporteur also wishes to point out that the European Commission expects lower expenditure on butter exports and a lowering of the intervention price for SMP as a result of the standardisation, with consequent budgetary savings.
The rapporteur also wishes to point out that the European Commission expects lower expenditure on butter exports and a lowering of the intervention price for SMP as a result of the standardisation, with consequent budgetary savings.
In the context of her opinion on the modification of the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products, and not in connection with the proposal being dealt with here, the rapporteur has recommended setting up a milk fund restructuring programme.
In the context of her opinion on the modification of the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products, and not in connection with the proposal being dealt with here, the rapporteur has recommended setting up a milk fund restructuring programme.
This approach seemed preferable from a legal point of view, since although the expected savings are an indirect consequence of the protein standardisation, the savings will be obtained in the form of lower expenditure on butter exports and the intervention price for SMP as of 2008.
This approach seemed preferable from a legal point of view, since although the expected savings are an indirect consequence of the protein standardisation, the savings will be obtained in the form of lower expenditure on butter exports and the intervention price for SMP as of 2008.
The milk fund restructuring programme could be used for market promotion and nutrition education measures for the milk sector, assistance towards ensuring a soft landing for milk producers in the forthcoming Health Check or support for any accompanying measures that may be needed in the milk sector between now and 2013.
The milk fund restructuring programme could be used for market promotion and nutrition education measures for the milk sector, assistance towards ensuring a soft landing for milk producers in the forthcoming Health Check or support for any accompanying measures that may be needed in the milk sector between now and 2013.
Консервирани млека, предназначени за консумация от човека (изменение на Директива 2001/114/ЕО)
Certain partly or wholly dehydrated preserved milk for human consumption (amendment of Directive 2001/114/EC)
Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Bernadette Bourzai, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Duarte Freitas, Ioannis Gklavakis, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Stéphane Le Foll, Jean-Claude Martinez, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Witold Tomczak, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
Katerina Batzeli, Sergio Berlato, Bernadette Bourzai, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Duarte Freitas, Ioannis Gklavakis, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Stéphane Le Foll, Jean-Claude Martinez, Mairead McGuinness, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, Willem Schuth, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Witold Tomczak, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
PE 386.532v02-00
PE 386.532v02-00
относно предложението за регламент на Съвета относно изменение на Регламент (ЕО) № 1255/1999 относно общата организация на пазара на мляко и млечни продукти
on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0058 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0058 ),
– като взе предвид член 37 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0084/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0084/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по земеделие и развитие на селските райони ( A6‑0283/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0283/2007 ),
(4) В съответствие с член 6, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) № 1255/1999 помощите за частно складиране на сметана се отпускат като мярка за подпомагане на пазара.
(4) In accordance with Article 6(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 aid for private storage of cream shall be granted as a market support measure.
Помощите за частно складиране на обезмасленото мляко на прах могат да бъдат отпускани на същото основание, в съответствие с член 7, параграф 3 от посочения регламент.
Equally, pursuant to Article 7(3) of that Regulation aid for private storage of skimmed milk powder may be granted.
Като се има предвид, че посочените две мерки за подпомагане са от дълго време неизползвани, дори и при ситуации със сериозен дисбаланс на пазарите за млечни мазнини и протеини, те могат да бъдат считани като излезли от употреба и следва да бъдат премахнати.
Given that the two support measures in practice have been inactive for a long time, even in situations with serious unbalance of the markets for milk fat and proteins, the two measures may be considered obsolete and should be abolished.
Private storage of cream and skimmed milk powder (SMP) should not be abolished, for the following reasons:
Private storage of cream and skimmed milk powder (SMP) should not be abolished, for the following reasons:
(1) Even the Single Common Market Organisation proposed by the Commission as a means of simplifying and harmonising the CAP continues to provide for private storage in a large number of sectors.
(1) Even the Single Common Market Organisation proposed by the Commission as a means of simplifying and harmonising the CAP continues to provide for private storage in a large number of sectors.
(2) The instrument should be retained as a safety net.
(2) The instrument should be retained as a safety net.
(3) Abolition of private storage is a fundamental political decision which should be kept for the general assessment to be carried out in the Health Check.
(3) Abolition of private storage is a fundamental political decision which should be kept for the general assessment to be carried out in the Health Check.
СЪОБРАЖЕНИЕ 8 А
RECITAL 8 A (new)