natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Commission would do well to work on a stronger integrated approach for the North Atlantic area.
The Commission would do well to work on a stronger integrated approach for the North Atlantic area.
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand
on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community on the one hand, and the Government of Denmark and the Home Rule Government of Greenland, on the other hand
Greenland has had a fisheries agreement with the EU since it ceased to be a member in 1985.
Greenland has had a fisheries agreement with the EU since it ceased to be a member in 1985.
The previous protocol, from 2001 through 2006, was criticized by the European Parliament
The previous protocol, from 2001 through 2006, was criticized by the European Parliament
OJ L 209, 2.8.2001, p.1. and the Court of Auditors, as acknowledged by the Commission in its Explanatory Memorandum, since it attempted to do two things simultaneously - to pay compensation for access to fish in Greenlandic waters, and to provide budgetary support to the Greenland Home Rule.
OJ L 209, 2.8.2001, p.1. and the Court of Auditors, as acknowledged by the Commission in its Explanatory Memorandum, since it attempted to do two things simultaneously - to pay compensation for access to fish in Greenlandic waters, and to provide budgetary support to the Greenland Home Rule.
At the mid-term review of the agreement in 2004, the Commission acted upon these concerns to an extent, by bringing the quotas allocated to the EU more into line with reality, which was a welcome move.
At the mid-term review of the agreement in 2004, the Commission acted upon these concerns to an extent, by bringing the quotas allocated to the EU more into line with reality, which was a welcome move.
At that time, Council stated its intention to base cooperation with Greenland on two separate pillars - a fisheries partnership agreement and a broader arrangement to provide cooperation with Greenland.
At that time, Council stated its intention to base cooperation with Greenland on two separate pillars - a fisheries partnership agreement and a broader arrangement to provide cooperation with Greenland.
The present agreement is the former, and the second will be the subject of a separate Council Decision.
The present agreement is the former, and the second will be the subject of a separate Council Decision.
The Budgets Committee should welcome the separation of these two aspects of relations with Greenland, for it will make it much more clear what money is being spent to do what, thus increasing transparency and accountability for the Community budget.
The Budgets Committee should welcome the separation of these two aspects of relations with Greenland, for it will make it much more clear what money is being spent to do what, thus increasing transparency and accountability for the Community budget.
This, then, is to be a more typical fisheries partnership agreement, similar in many respects to those with ACP countries.
This, then, is to be a more typical fisheries partnership agreement, similar in many respects to those with ACP countries.
The financial contribution is fixed at EUR 15,847,244 per year, including an amount of EUR 3,261,449 to aid Greenland develop and implement its multiannual sectoral programme for fisheries.
The financial contribution is fixed at EUR 15,847,244 per year, including an amount of EUR 3,261,449 to aid Greenland develop and implement its multiannual sectoral programme for fisheries.
In exchange, the EU fleets will receive quotas for several important stocks of fish, including cod, redfish, Greenland halibut, Atlantic halibut, shrimp, capelin and snowcrab.
In exchange, the EU fleets will receive quotas for several important stocks of fish, including cod, redfish, Greenland halibut, Atlantic halibut, shrimp, capelin and snowcrab.
The compensation also includes a reserve of EUR 1,540,000 to be used if the EU gets increased access to cod and capelin stocks in addition to those provided for in the annual quotas; this would be based upon scientific assessments of the stocks.
The compensation also includes a reserve of EUR 1,540,000 to be used if the EU gets increased access to cod and capelin stocks in addition to those provided for in the annual quotas; this would be based upon scientific assessments of the stocks.
A major difference between the Greenland agreement and the ACP agreements was the lack of licence fees to be paid by EU ship-owners, which led to complaints about discrimination.
A major difference between the Greenland agreement and the ACP agreements was the lack of licence fees to be paid by EU ship-owners, which led to complaints about discrimination.
The Commission thus introduced licence fees at the mid-term review in 2004.
The Commission thus introduced licence fees at the mid-term review in 2004.
Under the present agreement, the Commission estimates such fees to be approximately €2 million per year.
Under the present agreement, the Commission estimates such fees to be approximately €2 million per year.
As your rapporteur has stressed before, the idea of a multiannual sectoral fisheries programme, to be jointly decided upon by Greenland and the EU via a Joint Committee, has the potential to improve the management of the agreement and, if the information is made public, its transparency as well.
As your rapporteur has stressed before, the idea of a multiannual sectoral fisheries programme, to be jointly decided upon by Greenland and the EU via a Joint Committee, has the potential to improve the management of the agreement and, if the information is made public, its transparency as well.
Committee on Budgets should insist that it be kept informed of these evaluations.
Committee on Budgets should insist that it be kept informed of these evaluations.
As this is a new development in protocols, it is too early to tell if it will prove useful, leading to more responsible and sustainable fisheries in Greenland, so we must follow this development carefully.
As this is a new development in protocols, it is too early to tell if it will prove useful, leading to more responsible and sustainable fisheries in Greenland, so we must follow this development carefully.
Three amendments are proposed.
Three amendments are proposed.
Two relate to information that the Commission should provide to the Parliament, including a detailed ex post evaluation of the agreement before it is renewed and reports on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme.
Two relate to information that the Commission should provide to the Parliament, including a detailed ex post evaluation of the agreement before it is renewed and reports on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme.
The third proposes that if Member States do not report their catches to the Commission as they are required to do under the Common Fisheries Policy, then they should not be given fishing licences the following year.
The third proposes that if Member States do not report their catches to the Commission as they are required to do under the Common Fisheries Policy, then they should not be given fishing licences the following year.
Commissioner Borg has quite rightly given a very high priority to the fight against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing, and if EU Member States do not fulfil their basic responsibilities to report catches, it seems reasonable to not allow them to benefit from the significant subsides that these fisheries access agreements provide.
Commissioner Borg has quite rightly given a very high priority to the fight against Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing, and if EU Member States do not fulfil their basic responsibilities to report catches, it seems reasonable to not allow them to benefit from the significant subsides that these fisheries access agreements provide.
The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral fisheries policy described in Article 4 of the Protocol.
The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral fisheries policy described in Article 4 of the Protocol.
Article 4, paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 4, paragraph 1 a (new)
Where they have not done so, the Commission shall withhold their requests for fishing licences for the following year.
Where they have not done so, the Commission shall withhold their requests for fishing licences for the following year.
Article 4 a (new)
Article 4 a (new)
Партньорство в областта на рибното стопанство между ЕО, от една страна, и Дания и Гренландия, от друга
Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EC on the one hand and Denmark and Greenland on the other hand
PE 384.568v02-00
PE 384.568v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................23
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................22
за предложението за регламент на Съвета относно установяване на охранителни и изпълнителни мерки, приложими в регулаторната зона на Организацията за риболов в северозападната част на Атлантическия океан
on the proposal for a Council regulation on laying down conservation and enforcement measures applicable in the Regulatory Area of the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0609 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0609 )
Все още непубликувано в ОВ. ,
Not yet published in the Official Journal. ,
– като взе предвид член 37, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0403/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0403/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по рибно стопанство ( A6‑0162/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6‑0162/2007 ),
Exigências em matéria de capturas acessórias
By-catch requirements
Страничен улов, съхраняван на борда
By-catch retained on board
Os navios de pesca não podem exercer a pesca dirigida a espécies a que são aplicáveis limites de capturas acessórias.
Fishing vessels may not conduct directed fisheries for species for which by catch limits apply.
Considera-se que é exercida uma pesca dirigida a uma espécie sempre que em qualquer lanço essa espécie representar a maior percentagem das capturas em peso.
A directed fishery for a species is conducted when that species comprises the largest percentage by weight of the catch in any one haul .
Риболовните кораби ограничават страничния си улов до максимално количество от 2500 кг. или 10% от теглото, ако последното количество е по-голямо, от улова на всеки вид от списъка по приложение І, за който не е била определена общностна квота в съответния участък.
Fishing vessels shall limit their by-catch to a maximum of 2500 kg or 10 %, whichever is the greater, for each species listed in Annex I for which no quota has been allocated in that Division to the Community .
As capturas acessórias das espécies relativamente às quais não tenha sido fixada qualquer quota pela Comunidade numa parte da Área de Regulamentação da NAFO, efectuadas nessa parte aquando da pesca dirigida a qualquer espécie, não podem exceder, relativamente a cada espécie, 2 500 kg ou 10 % do peso de todas as capturas a bordo, no caso de esta quantidade ser mais elevada.
By ‑catches of the species for which no quotas have been fixed by the Community for a part of the NAFO Regulatory Area and taken in that part when fishing directly for any species may not exceed for each species 2 500 kg or 10 % by weight of the total catch retained on board, whichever is the greater.
Todavia, numa parte da Área de Regulamentação da NAFO em que seja proibida a pesca dirigida a certas espécies ou em que tenha sido esgotada uma quota “outros”, as capturas acessórias de cada uma dessas espécies não podem exceder, respectivamente, 1 250 quilogramas ou 5 %.
However, in a part of the NAFO Regulatory Area where directed fishing of certain species is banned or an “others” quota has been fully utilised, by-catches of each of such species may not exceed 1 250 kg or 5 % respectively .
В случаите, когато съществува забрана за риболов или е напълно изчерпана квотата "други", допълнителният улов на въпросния вид не може да надвишава 1250 кг. или 5%, ако последното количество е по-голямо.
In cases where a ban on fishing is in force or an "Others" quota has been fully utilised, the by-catch of the species concerned may not exceed 1250 kg or 5 %, whichever is the greater .
Sempre que as quantidades totais das espécies sujeitas a limites de capturas acessórias excederem, em qualquer lanço, qualquer um dos limites fixados no n.º 2, os navios afastar-se-ão imediatamente, no mínimo, 5 milhas marítimas da posição do lanço anterior.
Whenever the total amounts of species subject to by ‑catch limits in any haul exceed the limits laid down in paragraph 2, whichever is applicable, vessels shall immediately move a minimum of five nautical miles away from the previous haul position.
Sempre que as quantidades totais das espécies sujeitas a limites de capturas acessórias excederem, em qualquer lanço posterior, esses limites, os navios voltarão a afastar-se imediatamente, no mínimo, 5 milhas marítimas da posição do lanço anterior e não regressarão à zona durante um período mínimo de quarenta e oito horas.
Whenever the total amounts of species subject to by ‑catch limits in any future haul exceed those limits, vessels shall again immediately move a minimum of five nautical miles away from the previous haul position and shall not return to the Area for at least 48 hours .
Посочените в параграфи 1 и 2 проценти са проценти от общото тегло на целия улов от всеки вид на борда.
The percentages in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be calculated as the percentage, by weight, for each species of the total catch retained on board.
Уловът на скариди не се смята при изчисляването на количеството страничен улов на дънните видове.
Catches of shrimp shall not be included in the calculation of by-catch levels of groundfish species .
Sempre que a totalidade das capturas acessórias de todas as espécies presentes em qualquer lanço exceder 5 % do peso na divisão 3M e 2,5 % do peso na divisão 3L, os navios que pescam camarão árctico (Pandalus borealis) afastar-se-ão imediatamente, no mínimo, 5 milhas marítimas da posição do lanço anterior.
In the event that total by catches of all species in any haul exceed 5 % by weight in Division 3M and 2.5 % in Division 3L, vessels fishing for shrimp (Pandalus borealis), shall immediately move a minimum of 5 nautical miles from the position of the previous haul.
As capturas de camarão não são consideradas no cálculo do nível de capturas acessórias de espécies de fundo.
Catches of shrimp shall not be used in the calculation of by-catch level of groundfish species.
(Artigo 31º do Regulamento (CE) n° 41/2007 do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro 2006)
(Article 31 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Член 4А
Article 4 (a)
Член 4а
Article 4(a)
Страничен улов от хвърляне на мрежа
By-catch in any one haul
При условие, че процентите страничен улов от едно хвърляне на мрежа превишават установените в параграфи 1 и 2 на член 4, корабите трябва да се оттеглят на разстояние най-малко 5 морски мили от позицията на предходното хвърляне и през цялото времетраене на следващото хвърляне да поддържат минимално отстояние от 10 морски мили от която и да е позиция на предходното хвърляне.
If the percentages of by-catches in any one haul exceed the percentages laid down in Article 4(1) and (2) the vessel shall immediately move a minimum of 5 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow and throughout the next tow keep a minimum distance of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow.
Ако, след оттеглянето тези предели на страничен улов бъдат превишени при следващото хвърляне, корабите трябва да се изтеглят от участъка и не могат да навлизат повторно в него, преди да са изтекли най-малко 60 часа.
If after moving, the next haul exceeds these by-catch limits the vessel shall leave the Division and not return for at least 60 hours.
В случай на превишаване на общото количество страничен улов от всички дънни видове, за които е определена квота, при което и да било хвърляне, а за улова на скариди 5% от теглото, в участък 3M или 2,5 % от теглото в участък 3L, корабите трябва да се оттеглят на разстояние най-малко 10 морски мили от позицията на предходното хвърляне и през цялото времетраене на следващото хвърляне да поддържат минимално отстояние от 10 морски мили от всяка от позициите на предходното хвърляне.
Should total by-catches of all ground fish species subject to quota in any haul in the shrimp fishery exceed 5 % by weight in Division 3M or 2,5 % by weight in Division 3L, the vessel shall move a minimum of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow and throughout the next tow keep a minimum distance of 10 nautical miles from any position of the previous tow.
Процентите страничен улов, разрешени при всяко хвърляне на мрежите, са проценти от общото тегло на целия улов от всеки вид на борда.
The percentage of by-catch authorised in any one haul shall be calculated as the percentage, by weight, for each species of the total catch in that haul.
(Artigo 32º do Regulamento (CE) n° 41/2007 do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro 2006)
(Article 32 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Член 4Б
Article 4 (b)
Член 4б
Article 4 (b)
Целеви риболов и страничен улов
Directed fishery and by-catch
Капитаните на общностни кораби не могат да извършват целеви риболов на видове, по отношение на които не се прилагат ограничения за страничен улов.
Masters of Community vessels shall not conduct directed fisheries for species for which by-catch limits apply.
За целеви риболов се счита извършеният риболов на даден вид, ако при което и да било хвърляне този вид представлява по-голям процент от улова в тегловно съотношение.
A directed fishery for a species shall be considered to have been conducted when that species comprises the largest percentage by weight of the total catch in any one haul.
Въпреки това, при целевия риболов на скат, извършван помощта на уред с ширина на окото, определена по закон като подходяща за този вид риболов, първият път, в който при едно хвърляне уловът на видове, по отношение на които се прилагат ограничения, се окаже в по-голям процент от целия улов, изразен в тегло, се счита за случайно събитие.
However, when a vessel is conducting a directed fishery for skate with a legal mesh size appropriate for that fishery, the first time that, in a haul, catches of species for which by-catch limits apply comprise the largest percentage by weight of the total catch, they shall be considered as incidental.
В този случай, корабът трябва да промени незабавно курса си в съответствие с член 4а, параграфи 1 и 2.
In this event the vessel shall immediately change position in accordance with Article 4a(1) and (2).
След отсъствие от най-малко 60 часа от даден участък в съответствие с член 4а, параграфи 1 и 2, капитаните на общностни кораби трябва да извършат пробно хвърляне с продължителност не по-малко от три часа.
Following an absence from a Division of at least 60 hours in accordance with the provisions of Article 4a(1) and (2), masters of Community vessels shall undertake a trial tow the duration of which shall not exceed 3 hours.
В отклонение от параграф 1 на настоящия член, ако уловът от видове, по отношение на които се прилагат ограничения за страничния улов, при пробно хвърляне съставляват по-голям процент от целия улов, изразен в тегло, този риболов не се счита за целеви.
By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, if in a haul from such a trial tow catches of species for which by-catch limits apply comprise the largest percentage by weight of the total catch, it shall not be considered as a directed fishery.
(Artigo 33º do Regulamento (CE) n° 41/2007 do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro 2006)
(Article 33 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Na pesca dirigida às raias ( Rajidae ), a malhagem é aumentada para um mínimo de 280 mm na cuada e de 220 mm em todas as outras partes da rede de arrasto.
For direct fishing of skates ( Rajidae ) this mesh size shall be increased to minimum of 280 mm in the cod‑end and 220 mm in all other parts of the trawl.
Забранява се използването на бим-тралове с размери на окото под 130 мм в която и да е част за целеви риболов на дълбоководните видове, посочени в приложение І, с изключение на риболова на Акадски морски костур (Sebastes mentella), посочен в параграф 3.
The use of trawl net having in any section thereof net meshes of dimensions less than 130 mm shall be prohibited for direct fishing of the groundfish species referred to in Annex I , except for fishing for Sebastes mentella as referred to in paragraph 3 .
Размерът на окото може да бъде намален до 60 мм в случай на целеви риболов на късоопашат калмар (Illex illecebrosus).
That mesh size may be reduced to a minimum of 60 mm for direct fishing of short-finned squid ( Illex illecebrosus ).
При целевия риболов на скатове (Rajidae), размерът на окото се увеличава до най-малко 280 мм в затворения край и 220 мм във всички останали части на трала.
For direct fishing of skates ( Rajidae ) that mesh size shall be increased to a minimum of 280 mm in the cod-end and 220 mm in all other parts of the trawl.
Os navios que pescam camarão árctico ( Pandalus borealis ) devem utilizar redes de malhagem não inferior a 40 mm .
Vessels fishing for shrimp ( Pandalus borealis ) shall use nets with a minimum mesh size of 40 mm.
Кораби, които ловят северни скариди ( Pandalus borealis ), използват мрежи с размер на окото не по-малко от 40 мм .
Vessels fishing for shrimp ( Pandalus borealis ) shall use nets with a minimum mesh size of 40 mm.
Кораби, които ловят Акадски морски костур (Sebastes mentella) в подзона 2 и в участъци 1F и 3K , използват мрежи с размер на окото не по-малко от 100 мм.
Vessels fishing for pelagic Sebastes mentella (Oceanic redfish) in Sub-Area 2 and Division 1F and 3K shall use nets with a minimum mesh size of 100 mm.
(Artigo 29º do Regulamento (CE) n° 41/2007 do Conselho, de 21 de Dezembro 2006)
(Article 29 of Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2007 of 21 December 2006)
Na pesca dirigida a uma ou várias espécies constantes do anexo I, não podem encontrar-se a bordo dos navios redes cujas malhas tenham uma dimensão inferior à prevista no artigo 5.º.
When fishing directly for one or more of the species listed in Annex I, vessels may not carry nets with a mesh size smaller than that laid down in Article 5.
При целевия улов на един или повече видове, съгласно приложение І, на борда на общностните кораби не могат да се намират мрежи с размер на окото, по-малък от предвидения в член 5.
When fishing directly for one or more of the species listed in Annex I, Community vessels shall not carry nets with a mesh size smaller than that laid down in Article 29.
Todavia , os navios que, na mesma viagem , pesquem noutras zonas para além da Área de Regulamentação da NAFO podem manter a bordo redes de malhagem inferior à estabelecida no artigo 5.º, desde que estas estejam correctamente amarradas e arrumadas de modo a não estarem disponíveis para utilização imediata.
However, vessels fishing in the course of the same voyage in Areas other than the NAFO Regulatory Area may keep on board nets with a mesh size smaller than that laid down in Article 5 provided they are securely lashed and stowed and are not available for immediate use.
Essas redes devem
Those nets must