natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
In this context, Transfer request 07/2008 has been submitted reducing appropriations in 54 administrative lines of the Commissions Budget for salaries and pensions of staff and re-enforcing two operational lines, 03 01 Administrative expenditure of ‘Competition‚ policy area' and 03 03 02 'Damage requests resulting from legal procedures against the Commission's decisions in the field of competition policy', making available EUR 14 200 000 in order to support financially a Monitoring Trustee supervising the implementation of the complex Court ruling against Microsoft.
In this context, Transfer request 07/2008 has been submitted reducing appropriations in 54 administrative lines of the Commissions Budget for salaries and pensions of staff and re-enforcing two operational lines, 03 01 Administrative expenditure of ‘Competition‚ policy area' and 03 03 02 'Damage requests resulting from legal procedures against the Commission's decisions in the field of competition policy', making available EUR 14 200 000 in order to support financially a Monitoring Trustee supervising the implementation of the complex Court ruling against Microsoft.
The Council has rejected this transfer and asked for its insertion into this amending budget 3/2008.
The Council has rejected this transfer and asked for its insertion into this amending budget 3/2008.
Savings on salaries and pensions
Savings on salaries and pensions
This has the effect of a reduction of EUR 2 300 000 in commitment and payment appropriations under heading 5 (1,4 % salary increase in 2007 instead of 2,2 % -savings of EUR 18 900 000).
This has the effect of a reduction of EUR 2 300 000 in commitment and payment appropriations under heading 5 (1,4 % salary increase in 2007 instead of 2,2 % -savings of EUR 18 900 000).
Your rapporteur can agree on this part, as vaccinations in the concerned countries should be carried out as soon as possible.
Your rapporteur can agree on this part, as vaccinations in the concerned countries should be carried out as soon as possible.
Joint Undertakings
Joint Undertakings
According to the explanations of the Commission the creation would be budgetary neutral, as the appropriations will be deducted from the operational budget lines corresponding to the Seventh Framework Programme priorities.
According to the explanations of the Commission the creation would be budgetary neutral, as the appropriations will be deducted from the operational budget lines corresponding to the Seventh Framework Programme priorities.
This is in principle a regrettable side-effect of the creation of this kind of supplementary structures.
This is in principle a regrettable side-effect of the creation of this kind of supplementary structures.
ENIAC concerns Nanoelectronics, i.e. the natural progressing of microelectronics into the smaller dimensions.
ENIAC concerns Nanoelectronics, i.e. the natural progressing of microelectronics into the smaller dimensions.
Nanoelectronics is a key enabler for economical progress in a lot of different industrial sectors and for implementing many societal policies including environmental, energy saving, sustainability, elderly, mobility, security, and many more and can therefore boost the Lisbon goals.
Nanoelectronics is a key enabler for economical progress in a lot of different industrial sectors and for implementing many societal policies including environmental, energy saving, sustainability, elderly, mobility, security, and many more and can therefore boost the Lisbon goals.
The ENIAC Joint Technology Initiative is an industrially guided and industrially driven strategic initiative and is therefore budgeted under the Information Society policy line.
The ENIAC Joint Technology Initiative is an industrially guided and industrially driven strategic initiative and is therefore budgeted under the Information Society policy line.
EU Solidarity Fund
EU Solidarity Fund
The linkage with the establishment plan of Gender Institute has been questioned by the committee, because it puts the mobilisation of the Fund in question.
The linkage with the establishment plan of Gender Institute has been questioned by the committee, because it puts the mobilisation of the Fund in question.
Upgrading Director of Gender Institute
Upgrading Director of Gender Institute
The justification for the proposed upgrading seems weak ("no suitable candidate with the required competencies -", "if upgraded could attract high quality candidates for the post of Director").
The justification for the proposed upgrading seems weak ("no suitable candidate with the required competencies -", "if upgraded could attract high quality candidates for the post of Director").
Also, a small agency of 20 staff should be comparable with a unit in the Commission, which are headed by AD 11, 12 or 13.
Also, a small agency of 20 staff should be comparable with a unit in the Commission, which are headed by AD 11, 12 or 13.
The discussion in the committee on Budgets has shown that the proposed upgrading from AD 13 to AD 14 of the Directors post of the Gender Institute was not appreciated by many.
The discussion in the committee on Budgets has shown that the proposed upgrading from AD 13 to AD 14 of the Directors post of the Gender Institute was not appreciated by many.
Budget neutrality has been put in doubt during the discussion, comparing the salaries table of grade AD 13 and AD 14.
Budget neutrality has been put in doubt during the discussion, comparing the salaries table of grade AD 13 and AD 14.
A clear signal to Council has been given during the COBU meeting of 6 May in order to adopt the DAB 3/2008 as soon as possible, but taking on board an amendment by your rapporteur on the non-upgrading of the director post for the Gender Institute.
A clear signal to Council has been given during the COBU meeting of 6 May in order to adopt the DAB 3/2008 as soon as possible, but taking on board an amendment by your rapporteur on the non-upgrading of the director post for the Gender Institute.
The European Parliament would then not have to amend the DAB 3/2008, which would save time for the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
The European Parliament would then not have to amend the DAB 3/2008, which would save time for the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
ECOSOC establishment plan
ECOSOC establishment plan
A number of adjustments are proposed to the establishment plan of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).
A number of adjustments are proposed to the establishment plan of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC).
This are detailed below.
This are detailed below.
Summary of the requests
Summary of the requests
AD16-HC to AD16-HC T
AD16-HC to AD16-HC T
AST5 to AST5-T
AST5 to AST5-T
AD5-T to AST5-T
AD5-T to AST5-T
AST10-T to AD10-T
AST10-T to AD10-T
AST8-T to AD8-T
AST8-T to AD8-T
AD5-T to AD6-T
AD5-T to AD6-T
AD10-T to AD9-T
AD10-T to AD9-T
AST10 to AD10
AST10 to AD10
In budget terms, the operation is neutral, since the only request for upgrading is offset by the downgrading of a higher grade.
In budget terms, the operation is neutral, since the only request for upgrading is offset by the downgrading of a higher grade.
The total number of authorised posts will remain unchanged.
The total number of authorised posts will remain unchanged.
Проект на коригиращ бюджет № 3/2008 на Европейския съюз за финансовата 2008 година
Draft amending budget No 3/2008 of the European Union for the financial year 2008.
Kyösti Virrankoski - Ville Itälä
Kyösti Virrankoski - Ville Itälä
PE 405.813v02-00
PE 405.813v02-00
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ - РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И НА СЪВЕТА............4
ANNEX - DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL........4
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНОТО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ.....................................7
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE...........................................................................7
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и Съвета ( COM(2008)0200 - C6-0164/2008 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0200 - C6-0164/2008
– като взе предвид резултата от тристранната среща между Комисията и двете части на бюджетния орган, проведена на 16 април 2008 г.,
– having regard to the result of the trialogue amongst the Commission and the two arms of the budgetary authority held on 16 April 2008,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по бюджети ( A6-0205/2008 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0205/2008 ),
2. възлага на своя председател да подпише решението, съвместно с председателя на Съвета, и да осигури публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз;
Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and arrange for publication of this decision in the Official Journal of the European Union;
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ - РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И НА СЪВЕТА
ANNEX - DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
относно мобилизирането на средства от фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз в съответствие с точка 26 от Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление
on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯТ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И СЪВЕТЪТ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ,
като взеха предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление
Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
като взеха предвид Регламент (ЕО) № 2012/2002 на Съвета от 11 ноември 2002 г. за създаване на фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
OВ L 311, 14.11.2002 г., стp.
OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p.
(4) Гърция подаде заявление за мобилизиране на средства от Фонда във връзка с бедствие, предизвикано от горските пожари през август 2007 г.,
(4) Greece submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by forest fires in August 2007,
(5) Словения подаде заявление за мобилизиране на средства от Фонда във връзка с бедствие, предизвикано от наводненията през септември 2007 г.,
(5) Slovenia submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding in September 2007,
За общия бюджет на Европейския съюз за 2008 финансова година фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз се мобилизира за осигуряване на сумата от 98 023 212 евро под формата на бюджетни кредити за поети задължения и бюджетни кредити за плащания.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 98 023 212 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Настоящото решение се публикува в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Greece and Slovenia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund, following, respectively, forest fires in August 2007 and floods in September 2007 that caused serious damage in the two countries.
Greece and Slovenia applied for assistance from the Solidarity Fund, following, respectively, forest fires in August 2007 and floods in September 2007 that caused serious damage in the two countries.
The applications have been presented to the Commission respectively on 30 October and 19 November, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damages hit the two countries.
The applications have been presented to the Commission respectively on 30 October and 19 November, within the deadline of 10 weeks after the first damages hit the two countries.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 (IIA) allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
In 2008, it has already been proposed to mobilise EUR 162 387 985 for the application of the UK, following the floods that hit that country during summer 2007.
In 2008, it has already been proposed to mobilise EUR 162 387 985 for the application of the UK, following the floods that hit that country during summer 2007.
An amount of EUR 837 612 015 is still available.
An amount of EUR 837 612 015 is still available.
On 14 April the Commission presented a preliminary amending budget (AB No 3/2008) in order to enter in the 2008 Budget appropriate commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
On 14 April the Commission presented a preliminary amending budget (AB No 3/2008) in order to enter in the 2008 Budget appropriate commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
The amount proposed by the Commission in favour of the two countries is of EUR 98 023 212, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework
The amount proposed by the Commission in favour of the two countries is of EUR 98 023 212, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework
The amount of compensation proposed for Greece and Slovenia, will leave at least 25 % of the European Union Solidarity Fund available for allocation during the last quarter of the year, as required by Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) 2012/2002.
The amount of compensation proposed for Greece and Slovenia, will leave at least 25 % of the European Union Solidarity Fund available for allocation during the last quarter of the year, as required by Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) 2012/2002.
According to point 26 of the IIA, a trialogue has been held on 16 April amongst the Commission and the two arms of the budgetary authority in order to assess the proposal for the PAB 3/2008 of which the proposal for a mobilisation of the fund is part.
According to point 26 of the IIA, a trialogue has been held on 16 April amongst the Commission and the two arms of the budgetary authority in order to assess the proposal for the PAB 3/2008 of which the proposal for a mobilisation of the fund is part.
On 6 May the Committee on Budgets held a debate with representatives of both the European Commission and the Greek administration to evaluate the conditions of delivering and implementation on the ground, as well as to give visibility to the role played by the Parliament in the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
On 6 May the Committee on Budgets held a debate with representatives of both the European Commission and the Greek administration to evaluate the conditions of delivering and implementation on the ground, as well as to give visibility to the role played by the Parliament in the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
The Committee on Regional Development, asked for an opinion, decided on 28 May 2008 to take no action on this proposal in order not to slow down the allocation process.
The Committee on Regional Development, asked for an opinion, decided on 28 May 2008 to take no action on this proposal in order not to slow down the allocation process.
Greece forest fires
Greece forest fires
2 118 273 411
2 118 273 411
89 769 009
89 769 009
Slovenia flooding
Slovenia flooding
233 395 389
233 395 389
8 254 203
8 254 203
98 023 212
98 023 212
The Rapporteur recommends the approval of the Commission proposal.
The Rapporteur recommends the approval of the Commission proposal.
Reimer Böge, Costas Botopoulos, Simon Busuttil, Brigitte Douay, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Catherine Guy-Quint, Jutta Haug, Mario Mauro, Gérard Onesta, Margaritis Schinas, László Surján, Kyösti Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
Reimer Böge, Costas Botopoulos, Simon Busuttil, Brigitte Douay, Salvador Garriga Polledo, Catherine Guy-Quint, Jutta Haug, Mario Mauro, Gérard Onesta, Margaritis Schinas, László Surján, Kyösti Virrankoski, Ralf Walter
PE 400.568v02-00
PE 400.568v02-00
за изменение на член 29 от Правилника за дейността на Европейския парламент - Образуване на политически групи
on amendment of Rule 29 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure - Formation of political groups
– като взе предвид предложението за изменение на своя правилник ( B6‑0420/2006 ),
- having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure ( B6-0420/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по конституционни въпроси ( A6‑0206/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0206/2008 ),
Член 29 - параграф 2 a (нов)
Rule 29 - paragraph 2 a (new)
Когато числеността на дадена група се понижи под необходимия праг, председателят на Парламента, със съгласието на Председателския съвет, може да разреши по-нататъшното й съществуване до следващото учредително заседание на Парламента, в случай че са изпълнени следните условия:
Where a group falls below the required threshold, the President, with the agreement of the Conference of Presidents, may allow it to continue to exist until Parliament's next constitutive sitting, provided the following conditions are met:
- членовете продължават да представляват най-малко една пета от държавите-членки;
- the members continue to represent at least one-fifth of the Member States;
- групата е съществувала по-дълго от една година.
- the group has been in existence for a period longer than one year.
Председателят на Парламента не прилага настоящата дерогация, когато са налице достатъчно сведения да се допусне, че с нея се злоупотребява.
The President shall not apply this derogation where there is sufficient evidence to suspect that it is being abused.
В досегашните разисквания в комисията по конституционни въпроси относно възможното преразглеждане на член 29 (Образуване на политически групи) се откроиха три въпроса.
In the discussions so far in the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the possible revision of Rule 29 (formation of political groups) three issues have emerged.
Всички се отнасят до възможно преразглеждане на параграф 2 относно минималния размер на политическите групи.
They all concern a possible revision of paragraph two concerning the minimum size of a political group.
(1) Брой на държавите-членки
(1) Number of member states
Според сега действащата разпоредба на Правилника една политическа група трябва да се състои от членове, "избрани в най-малко една пета от държавите-членки".
The rule currently requires a political group to comprise members "elected in at least one fifth of the member states".
Статутът на европейските политически партии определя като уместен критерий "една четвърт" от държавите-членки.
The statute on European political parties refers to "one quarter" of the member states being the relevant criterion.
Беше предложено вътрешнопарламентарните ни разпоредби да отразяват приетото по отношение на европейските политически партии законодателство.
It has been suggested that our internal parliamentary rules should reflect the legislation that has been adopted regarding European political parties.
Ако променим Правилника на Парламента, така че за отправна точка да служи една четвърт, това би означавало, че за една група в момента биха били необходими членове на ЕП от седем държави-членки, вместо от шест.
If we were to change Parliament's rules to refer to one quarter, this would mean that a group would currently require MEPs from seven member states instead of six.
Нито една от тези цифрови стойности не би се променила в случай на присъединяване на Хърватия.
Neither of these figures would change in the event of Croatian accession.
(2) Брой на членовете на ЕП
(2) Number of members
Минималният брой членове за образуване на политическа група в момента е двадесет.
The minimum number of MEPs required to form a political group is currently twenty.
Това представлява едва 2,55% от членския състав на Европейския парламент.
This represents a mere 2.55% of the membership of the European Parliament.
Приложената таблица показва, че в 21 от 25-те национални парламента, които имат правила относно политическите групи, в поне една от парламентарните камари е необходим по-висок праг, който достига 8,5% (Люксембург), 8,1% (австрийски Федерален съвет) или 7% (полски Сенат), но като цяло е над равнището от 4% (15 държави-членки).
The attached table shows that in 21 of the 25 national parliaments which have rules on political groups, a higher threshold is required in at least one parliamentary chamber, going as high as 8.5% (Luxembourg), 8.1% (Austrian Bundesrat) or 7% (Polish Senat), but generally above the 4% level (15 Member States).
Възниква въпросът дали прагът в Европейския парламент би следвало да се повиши, така че да е по-близо до средните за националните парламенти величини.
The question arises as to whether the European Parliament's threshold should be raised to something closer to the average practice of national parliaments.
Ако в следващия парламент се установи брой от 30 членове от общо 750, това би съответствало на стойност от 4%, която отново би била по-ниска от средната за националните парламенти.
If the figure were fixed at 30 Members out of 750 in the next parliament that would correspond to a figure of 4% which would still be less than the average for national parliaments.
Предложение за изменение, целящо повишение на минималния брой членове, необходими за създаване на политическа група, беше внесено от докладчика, но при гласуването комисията го отхвърли с много малко мнозинство.
An amendment aiming at raising the minimum number of members needed for establishing a political group was tabled by the Rapporteur, but the Committee rejected it by a very narrow vote.
(3) Запазване на група, в случай че след нейното образуване броят на членовете й се понижи под прага
(3) Maintaining a group that slips below the threshold after it has been created
Г-н Bonde и други обърнаха внимание на трудната ситуация, която може да възникне, когато дадена група е била образувана точно с броя членове, необходим за достигане на минималния праг.
Mr Bonde and others have drawn attention to the difficult situation that can arise when a group has been created with just enough members to reach the minimum threshold.
Впоследствие такава група е изключително уязвима на политически натиск от страна на малка група членове - дори от един-единствен член, която(който) може да заплаши да напусне групата, като по този начин я разруши, ако не наложи волята си по определен въпрос.
It is then extremely vulnerable to political pressure from a small group of members - even a single member - who can threaten to leave the group, thereby destroying it unless he/she gets their way on a particular matter.
Поради това следва да се обмисли възможността за разрешаване на една група да продължи да съществува, най-малко за определен период от време, ако след нейното образуване броят на членовете й се понижи под необходимия праг.
Consideration should therefore be given to allowing a group to continue to exist, at least for a period of time, if after its creation it slips below the threshold needed.
Например, ако за образуване на политическа група са необходими 30 членове, такава група може да продължи да съществува в срок до една година, при условие че има най-малко 25 членове.
For instance, if 30 members are required to form a political group, such a group could continue to exist for up to a year provided that it had at least 25 members.
Въпреки това, за да бъде въведено такова правило, то би следвало да е придружено от мерки за гарантиране, че членовете не могат последователно да бъдат „заемани” на различни групи за подпомагане на тяхното образуване, след което да се прехвърлят отново и отново за образуване на нови групи.
However, for such a rule to be introduced, it should be accompanied by measures to ensure that members cannot be successively "lent to" different groups to help with their creation, then moving on to constitute other groups again and again.
Политически групи в националните парламенти
Political groups in national parliaments