natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Съобщаването на данните на други публични органи или на физически лица следва да е позволено единствено ако в конкретен случай:
Communication to other public bodies or private parties should only be permissible if, in a particular case:
а) съществува недвусмислено правно задължение или разрешение, или с разрешението на надзорния орган, или ако
a. there exists a clear legal obligation or authorisation, or with the authorisation of the supervisory authority, or if
б) тези данни са необходими на получателя, за да му дадат възможност да изпълни собствената си законна задача, и доколкото целта на събирането и обработката на данни, извършени от получателя, не е несъвместима с първоначалната обработка на данни, и правните задължения на съобщаващия орган не противоречат на това.
b. these data are indispensable to the recipient to enable him to fulfil his own lawful task and provided that the aim of the collection or processing to be carried out by the recipient is not incompatible with the original processing, and the legal obligations of the communicating body are not contrary to this.
Освен това, съобщаване на други публични органи се разрешава по изключение, ако в конкретен случай:
Furthermore, communication to other public bodies is exceptionally permissible if in a particular case:
а) съобщаването е без никакво съмнение в интерес на субекта на данни и в случай че той е дал съгласието си или обстоятелствата позволяват ясна презумпция за такова съгласие, или ако
a. the communication is undoubtedly in the interest of the data subject and either the data subject has consented or circumstances are such as to allow a clear presumption of such consent, or if
б) съобщаването е необходимо, за да се предотврати сериозна и непосредствена заплаха.
b. the communication is necessary so as to prevent a serious and imminent danger.
Съобщаването на данни на трети страни или международни органи следва да бъде подчинено на съществуването на подходяща правна рамка, произтичаща от предварително извършено разглеждане на това съобщаване от надзорен орган или в контекста на законодателна мярка, по-специално при условие че искането за подобно съобщаване съдържа ясни указания за органа или лицето, което ги изисква, целта, пропорционалността и мерките за сигурност на обработката на данни, и подходящите гаранции за осигуряване на задължителна рамка относно използването на данни.
Communication of data to third countries or international bodies should be subject to the existence of an appropriate legal framework resulting from an examination performed prior to the start thereof by a supervisory authority or in the context of a legislative measure, providing in particular, that the request for such communication contains clear indications as to the body or person requesting them, the purpose, the proportionality and the security measures of the processing, and the adequate guarantees to ensure a mandatory framework about the use of data.
Подобни гаранции следва да бъдат определени принципно въз основа на стандартна процедура, като се вземат предвид всички принципи, установени в настоящото приложение.
Such guarantees should be assessed in general on the basis of a standard procedure by taking into account all the principles set out in this Annex.
Принцип 12
Principle 12
(Уведомяване и предварителна проверка)
(Notification and prior checking)
Държавите-членки определят категориите постоянни или специални досиета, които биха могли да представляват конкретни рискове за правата и свободите на субектите на данни, които трябва да бъдат съобщени на даден надзорен орган или подложени на предварителна проверка съгласно условията и процедурите, които ще бъдат определени от националното законодателство.
Member States shall identify the categories of permanent or ad hoc files likely to present specific risks to the rights and freedoms of data subjects, to be notified to a supervisory authority or subject to a prior checking under the conditions and procedures to be specified by domestic law.
Принцип 13
Principle 13
Контролният орган е отговорен за гарантиране на спазването на разпоредбите, установени в настоящите принципи, по-специално за всички дейности, извършени и/или поверени на подизпълнители, действащи по негови указания.
The controller is responsible for ensuring that the provisions set out in these principles are respected, in particular as for any activities performed by and/or committed to processors acting under his instructions.
Принцип 14
Principle 14
(Средства за правна защита и отговорност)
(Judicial remedies and liability)
Всяко лице има право на правна защита за всяко нарушаване на правата, които му гарантират настоящите принципи.
Every person has the right to a judicial legal remedy for any breach of the rights guaranteed to him by these principles.
Субектът на данни има право на обезщетение за всички претърпени от него вреди вследствие на незаконно обработка на лични данни, които го засягат.
The data subject has the right to compensation for any damage suffered by him because of the unlawful processing of personal data concerning him.
Контрольорът може да бъде освободен от отговорност, отчасти или изцяло, ако докаже, че не е отговорен за събитието, от което произтича увреждането.
The controller may be exempted from his liability, in whole or in part, if he proves that he is not responsible for the event giving rise to the damage
Принцип 15
Principle 15
Един или няколко обществени надзорни органи трябва да контролират и прилагат спазването на принципите на защита на личните данни.
Observance of the principles of personal data protection should be monitored and enforced by one or more public supervisory authorities.
Надзорните органи следва по-специално да бъдат оправомощени да разследват и да се намесват, което им позволява по целесъобразност да поемат инициативата за поправка или заличаване на лични данни, чиято обработка не отговаря на установените в настоящото приложение принципи.
The supervisory authorities should in particular be endowed with powers of investigation and intervention allowing them in particular to instigate, as appropriate, the rectification or erasure of personal data whose processing does not comply with the principles established in this Annex.
Тези органи действат напълно независимо при изпълнението на възложените им функции.
These authorities shall act in complete independence in exercising the functions entrusted to them.
Надзорните органи се консултират при изготвяне на законодателни и административни мерки или норми, свързани със защита на правата и свободите на лицата, относно обработката на лични данни или които имат въздействие върху тях.
The supervisory authorities shall be consulted when drawing up legislative and administrative measures or regulations relating to the protection of individuals’ rights and freedoms with regard to the processing of personal data or otherwise having an impact on them.
Надзорните органи разполагат също така с:
The supervisory authorities shall be endowed with:
а) правомощия за разследване, като например правомощия за достъп до данни, предмет на операциите по обработка на данни, и правомощия за събиране на цялата необходима информация за изпълнението на задълженията им по надзор,
a. investigative powers, such as powers of access to data forming the subject-matter of processing operations and powers to collect all the information necessary for the performance of their supervisory duties,
б) ефективни правомощия за намеса, като например даване на становища преди операциите по обработката на данни да са извършени в съответствие с принцип 12, и за нареждане на заличаване или унищожаване на данни, налагане на окончателна забрана за обработка на данни, отправяне на предупреждение или забележка към контролния орган или отнасяне на въпроса до Парламента или до други политически институции,
b. effective powers of intervention, such as, for example that of delivering opinions before processing operations are carried out, in accordance with principle 12, and of ordering erasure or destruction of data, of imposing a definitive ban on processing, of warning or admonishing the controller, or that of referring the matter to the Parliament or other political institutions,
в) правомощие да участват в съдебни производства, когато принципите не са спазени, или да сезират съдебни органи за тези нарушения .
c. the power to engage in legal proceedings where the principles have been violated or to bring these violations to the attention of judicial authorities.
Решенията на надзорните органи, които пораждат жалби, могат да се обжалват по съдебен ред.
Decisions by the supervisory authorities which give rise to complaints may be appealed against through the courts.
Надзорните органи могат да бъдат сезирани и да вземат решения по искове, предявени от всяко лице или сдружение, представляващо това лице, относно защита на правата и свободите във връзка с обработката на лични данни.
Supervisory authorities shall hear and decide on claims lodged by any person, or by an association representing that person, concerning the protection of his rights and freedoms in respect of the processing of personal data.
Заинтересованото лице следва да бъде информирано за резултата от предявения иск.
The person concerned shall be informed of the outcome of the claim.
Надзорните органи могат да бъдат сезирани, по-специално за искове за проверка за законосъобразност на обработката на данни, предявени от всяко лице, когато се прилага принцип 8, точка 3.
The supervisory authority shall, in particular, hear claims for checks on the lawfulness of data processing lodged by any person when the principle 8.3 is applied.
Лицето следва непременно да бъде информирано, че е била извършена проверка.
The person shall at any rate be informed that a check has taken place.
Надзорните органи редовно изготвят доклад за дейността си .
Supervisory authorities shall draw up a report on their activities at regular intervals.
Докладът се оповестява публично .
The report shall be made public.
The European Parliament has for several years been calling on the Council to adopt common principles relating to protection of data used for security purposes.
The European Parliament has for several years been calling on the Council to adopt common principles relating to protection of data used for security purposes.
The rapporteur endorses these 15 principles and calls on the other European institutions to follow suit.
The rapporteur endorses these 15 principles and calls on the other European institutions to follow suit.
In December 2005, at the time of the adoption of the Directive on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services, the Council reaffirmed the commitment of several successive Presidencies to the swift adoption of a framework decision on the protection of personal data in the third pillar.
In December 2005, at the time of the adoption of the Directive on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services, the Council reaffirmed the commitment of several successive Presidencies to the swift adoption of a framework decision on the protection of personal data in the third pillar.
The European Parliament, aware of the urgency of the harmonisation of the rights of European citizens and protection of their privacy in connection with police and judicial cooperation, adopted its opinion on 14 June 2006, proposing a number of amendments to enhance the Commission proposal.
The European Parliament, aware of the urgency of the harmonisation of the rights of European citizens and protection of their privacy in connection with police and judicial cooperation, adopted its opinion on 14 June 2006, proposing a number of amendments to enhance the Commission proposal.
In its legislative resolution adopted on 27 September 2006, Parliament called on the Council 'to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially'.
In its legislative resolution adopted on 27 September 2006, Parliament called on the Council 'to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially'.
After deadlock had been reached within the Council on this framework decision, the European Parliament adopted, on 14 December 2006, a recommendation to the Council in which it stated that it was 'extremely concerned at the direction being taken by the debate in the Council, with Member States appearing to be moving towards a data protection agreement based on the lowest common denominator,' and feared, 'moreover, that the level of data protection will be lower than that provided by Directive 95/46/EC and Council of Europe Convention No 108 and that implementation of such an agreement might have a negative impact on the general principle of data protection in each Member State without establishing a satisfactory level of protection at European level'.
After deadlock had been reached within the Council on this framework decision, the European Parliament adopted, on 14 December 2006, a recommendation to the Council in which it stated that it was 'extremely concerned at the direction being taken by the debate in the Council, with Member States appearing to be moving towards a data protection agreement based on the lowest common denominator,' and feared, 'moreover, that the level of data protection will be lower than that provided by Directive 95/46/EC and Council of Europe Convention No 108 and that implementation of such an agreement might have a negative impact on the general principle of data protection in each Member State without establishing a satisfactory level of protection at European level'.
Renewed consultation of the European Parliament
Renewed consultation of the European Parliament
I wish first of all to welcome the efforts made by the German Presidency, which have made it possible to overcome the deadlock within the Council over this framework decision.
I wish first of all to welcome the efforts made by the German Presidency, which have made it possible to overcome the deadlock within the Council over this framework decision.
The revised proposal for a framework decision proposed by the Presidency has made it possible to reach political agreement, which should mean that it can be adopted swiftly.
The revised proposal for a framework decision proposed by the Presidency has made it possible to reach political agreement, which should mean that it can be adopted swiftly.
I also welcome the Council's appreciation of the need to keep the European Parliament fully involved in these negotiations by formally re-consulting it.
I also welcome the Council's appreciation of the need to keep the European Parliament fully involved in these negotiations by formally re-consulting it.
A framework decision on data protection in the third pillar is an indispensable instrument for the establishment of a genuine area of freedom, security and justice.
A framework decision on data protection in the third pillar is an indispensable instrument for the establishment of a genuine area of freedom, security and justice.
The exchange of growing quantities of data, including personal data, in the fields covered by the third pillar must meet European Union requirements regarding the protection of fundamental rights and must comply with Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (respect for private life and protection of personal data).
The exchange of growing quantities of data, including personal data, in the fields covered by the third pillar must meet European Union requirements regarding the protection of fundamental rights and must comply with Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (respect for private life and protection of personal data).
However, if we wish to make it possible to reinforce the principle of mutual confidence between the competent authorities and thereby contribute to better functioning of European police and judicial cooperation, the level of protection afforded by this framework decision must represent added value in relation to existing provisions, particularly the Council of Europe's Convention 108 and Recommendation 87.
However, if we wish to make it possible to reinforce the principle of mutual confidence between the competent authorities and thereby contribute to better functioning of European police and judicial cooperation, the level of protection afforded by this framework decision must represent added value in relation to existing provisions, particularly the Council of Europe's Convention 108 and Recommendation 87.
The European Parliament has for some years been calling on the Council to adopt common principles relating to the protection of data used for security purposes.
The European Parliament has for some years been calling on the Council to adopt common principles relating to the protection of data used for security purposes.
The existence of such principles would be useful not only to direct activities within the EU but also as a basis for negotiations with third countries, particularly the United States, and international organisations.
The existence of such principles would be useful not only to direct activities within the EU but also as a basis for negotiations with third countries, particularly the United States, and international organisations.
There has not been a satisfactory response to this suggestion, despite proposals put forward during the Italian and Greek Presidencies.
There has not been a satisfactory response to this suggestion, despite proposals put forward during the Italian and Greek Presidencies.
The problem was ultimately broached again under the German Presidency and during a trialogue between your rapporteur, Minister Schäuble and Commissioner Frattini on 28 March 2007.
The problem was ultimately broached again under the German Presidency and during a trialogue between your rapporteur, Minister Schäuble and Commissioner Frattini on 28 March 2007.
On that occasion the Commissioner gave me a draft text setting out 15 general principles which summarised the existing approach to protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, derived from the relevant international conventions and European law, which you will find attached.
On that occasion the Commissioner gave me a draft text setting out 15 general principles which summarised the existing approach to protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, derived from the relevant international conventions and European law, which you will find attached.
As rapporteur, I am bound to welcome this initiative and the quality of the work submitted to me.
As rapporteur, I am bound to welcome this initiative and the quality of the work submitted to me.
I endorse these 15 principles and I propose that they should serve as a background to our legislative work in this field and a basis for negotiations with third countries.
I endorse these 15 principles and I propose that they should serve as a background to our legislative work in this field and a basis for negotiations with third countries.
I consider, incidentally, that the other institutions should adopt formal positions on them, and I would like to propose that they be mentioned during the plenary debate, incorporated in the Plenary Minutes as an interinstitutional declaration and recalled in the legislative resolution stating the EP's opinion of the Council position in this report.
I consider, incidentally, that the other institutions should adopt formal positions on them, and I would like to propose that they be mentioned during the plenary debate, incorporated in the Plenary Minutes as an interinstitutional declaration and recalled in the legislative resolution stating the EP's opinion of the Council position in this report.
Substance of the new proposal for a framework decision
Substance of the new proposal for a framework decision
I welcome the fact that we have reached agreement on this text, which the Parliament has been calling for since the creation of the third pillar.
I welcome the fact that we have reached agreement on this text, which the Parliament has been calling for since the creation of the third pillar.
However, I have on several occasions stressed that the necessary speed of the negotiations should not be allowed to detract from the quality of the framework decision and the level of protection of privacy for which it provides.
However, I have on several occasions stressed that the necessary speed of the negotiations should not be allowed to detract from the quality of the framework decision and the level of protection of privacy for which it provides.
This framework decision must afford a high level of data protection for citizens and added value in relation to the provisions in force in this field.
This framework decision must afford a high level of data protection for citizens and added value in relation to the provisions in force in this field.
Although it does not yet permit genuine harmonisation at this stage, the framework decision should on no account allow a level of protection less than that ensured by Convention 108.
Although it does not yet permit genuine harmonisation at this stage, the framework decision should on no account allow a level of protection less than that ensured by Convention 108.
In his third opinion on this proposal for a framework decision, the European Data Protection Supervisor stated that, as it stands, there is a risk that the text may reduce the level of protection enjoyed by citizens and fall short of the level guaranteed by Convention 108.
In his third opinion on this proposal for a framework decision, the European Data Protection Supervisor stated that, as it stands, there is a risk that the text may reduce the level of protection enjoyed by citizens and fall short of the level guaranteed by Convention 108.
He also underlined the fact that this lowest common denominator will not serve the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice, as the exchange of personal data by the competent authorities will be subject to different levels of protection.
He also underlined the fact that this lowest common denominator will not serve the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice, as the exchange of personal data by the competent authorities will be subject to different levels of protection.
I therefore propose a series of amendments to return to what European Parliament regarded as the main points when adopting its first report:
I therefore propose a series of amendments to return to what European Parliament regarded as the main points when adopting its first report:
Although we may welcome the extension of the scope of this instrument to Europol and Eurojust, it has not been extended to data processing at national level.
Although we may welcome the extension of the scope of this instrument to Europol and Eurojust, it has not been extended to data processing at national level.
Only one recital (Recital 6a) alludes to this possibility.
Only one recital (Recital 6a) alludes to this possibility.
Yet this is absolutely necessary, for it is impossible to determine in advance whether or not data will be communicated to another Member State.
Yet this is absolutely necessary, for it is impossible to determine in advance whether or not data will be communicated to another Member State.
In order not to apply different levels of data protection, the framework decision should be of wide scope, including processing of data at national level.
In order not to apply different levels of data protection, the framework decision should be of wide scope, including processing of data at national level.
Aware of the problems which this poses within the Council, I propose setting a time limit of three years, at the end of which the Commission should conduct an assessment and make proposals for extending the scope of the decision.
Aware of the problems which this poses within the Council, I propose setting a time limit of three years, at the end of which the Commission should conduct an assessment and make proposals for extending the scope of the decision.
- subsequent processing of data
- subsequent processing of data