natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Комисията оценява приложимостта на оценката на съответствие, дейности по акредитация и наблюдение на пазара, финансирани от Общността предвид изискванията на политиките и законодателството на Общността, и информира Европейския парламент и Съвета за резултата от такива дейности най-малко на всеки три години.
The Commission shall evaluate the relevance of the conformity assessment, accreditation and market surveillance activities receiving Community financing in the light of the requirements of Community policies and legislation and inform the European Parliament and the Council about the outcome of such activities at least every three years.
The five year period proposed by the executive Commission is too long and needs to be shortened.
The five year period proposed by the executive Commission is too long and needs to be shortened.
С цел да се улесни прилагането на настоящия регламент, Комисията очертава насоките.
In order to facilitate the implementation of this Regulation, the Commission shall draw up guidelines.
С цел да се улесни прилагането на настоящия регламент, Комисията очертава насоките след съгласуване със заинтересованите страни .
In order to facilitate the implementation of this Regulation, the Commission shall draw up guidelines in consultation with stakeholders .
Stakeholders should be consulted by the Commission when setting up implementation guidelines.
Stakeholders should be consulted by the Commission when setting up implementation guidelines.
Член 35 a (нов)
Article 35 a (new)
Член 35a Клауза за преразглеждане
Article 35a Review clause
Не по-късно от … 1 Комисията представя на Европейския парламент и на Съвета доклад за прилагането на настоящия регламент и на Директива 2001/95/ЕО относно общата безопасност на продуктите, както и на всеки друг инструмент на Общността, отнасящ се до наблюдението на пазара.
Not later than … 1 , the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the application of this Regulation and Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety and any other relevant Community instrument addressing market surveillance.
Докладът анализира, в частност, съгласуваността на правилата на Общността в областта на наблюдението на пазара.
In particular, the report shall analyse the coherence of Community rules in the field of market surveillance.
Ако е подходящо, докладът се придружава от предложения за изменение и/или обединяване на съответните инструменти, с цел по-добро регулиране и опростяване.
If appropriate, the report shall be accompanied by proposals to amend and/or consolidate the instruments concerned, in the interests of better regulation and simplification.
Докладът включва оценка на разширяването на приложното поле на Глава ІІІ от настоящия регламент върху всички продукти.
The report shall include an evaluation of the extension of the scope of Chapter III of this Regulation to all products.
1 Пет години от датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент.
1 Five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Държавите-членки определят правилата за санкции, включително наказателни санкции за сериозни нарушения, приложими за нарушение на разпоредбите на настоящия регламент и предприемат всички необходими мерки, за да гарантират тяхното прилагане.
The Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties, which may include criminal sanctions, for serious infringements, applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented.
Предвидените санкциите трябва да са ефективни, пропорционални и възпиращи.
The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Държавите-членки нотифицират Комисията за тези разпоредби най-късно до […] и я нотифицират незабавно за всяко последващо изменение, което ги засяга.
The Member States shall notify those provisions to the Commission by […] at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
Предвидените санкции трябва да се ефективни, пропорционални и възпиращи и трябва да бъдат пропорционално увеличавани, в случай че съответният икономически оператор е извършил подобно нарушение на разпоредбите на настоящия регламент в миналото.
The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and must be proportionally increased if the relevant economic operator has committed a similar infringement of the provisions of this Regulation in the past .
See justification to Amendment 134.
See justification to Amendment 134.
Член 36 a (нов)
Article 36 a (new)
Член 36a
Article 36a
Изменение на Директива 2001/95/ЕО
Amendment to Directive 2001/95/EC
В член 8 от Директива 2001/95/EО, параграф 3 се заменя със следния текст:
In Article 8 of Directive 2001/95/EC, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:
В случаи на продукти, представляващи сериозен риск, компетентните органи предприемат с необходимата бързина подходящи мерки , посочени в параграф 1, буква б) до е).
In the case of products posing a serious risk, the competent authorities shall take with due dispatch the appropriate measures referred to in paragraph 1(b) to (f).
Съществуването на сериозен риск се определя от държавите-членки, оценявайки индивидуалните особености на всеки отделен случай, като се отчитат указанията, посочени в точка 8 от приложение II."
The existence of a serious risk shall be determined by the Member States, assessing each individual case on its merits, taking into account the guidelines referred to in point 8 of Annex II.”
Регламент (ЕИО) № 339/93 се отменя, считано от две години след датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент.
Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 is repealed with effect from two years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Регламент (ЕИО) № 339/93 се отменя, считано от датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент.
Regulation (EEC) No 339/93 is repealed with effect from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Глава III се прилага, считано от две години след датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент.
Chapter III shall apply with effect from two years after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Изисквания за признаване съгласно член 12а.
Requirements for recognition under Article 12a.
Орган, признат съгласно член 12а ("органът"), се създава в рамките на Европейската общност.
A body recognised under Article 12a (“the body”) shall be established within the European Community.
Националните органи по акредитация в рамките на Общността имат право на членство от момента на създаването на органа, при условие че платят изискваната членска вноска и спазват изложените в настоящия регламент и съгласувани с Комисията в рамковото споразумение правила и цели на органа.
Under the body’s constitution, national accreditation bodies from within the Community shall be entitled to be members, provided that they pay the requisite membership fees and comply with the rules and objectives of the body, as set out herein and as agreed with the Commission in the framework agreement.
Органът провежда консултации с всички заинтересовани страни при изготвянето на решения, които се отнасят до тях.
The body shall consult all stakeholders in the preparation of decisions that will affect them.
Органът предоставя на своите членове услуги за партньорски проверки, които отговарят на изискванията на член 9.
The body shall provide its members with peer evaluation services satisfying the requirements of Article 9.
Процедурите на органа позволяват сключването на многостранни споразумения, които гарантират, че когато национален орган по акредитация успешно завърши периодична партньорска оценка относно предоставените от него услуги по акредитация, тези услуги се признават от другите национални органи по акредитация.
The body’s procedures shall enable the conclusion of multilateral agreements that ensure that where a national accreditation body successfully completes periodical peer evaluation in respect of the accreditation services it provides, those services shall be recognised by other national accreditation bodies.
Органът извършва поставените от Комисията задачи съгласно член 12.
The body shall carry out the tasks requested by the Commission under Article 12.
(Това изменение заменя изменение 110 от проектодоклада)
(This AM replaces AM 110 from the Draft Report)
The Rapporteur welcomes the proposal for a Regulation on the accreditation and market surveillance of products in the Community, and the accompanying proposal for a Decision on a common framework for the marketing of products.
The Rapporteur welcomes the proposal for a Regulation on the accreditation and market surveillance of products in the Community, and the accompanying proposal for a Decision on a common framework for the marketing of products.
Creating an internal market for goods is one of the European Community’s objectives.
Creating an internal market for goods is one of the European Community’s objectives.
The internal market is an area without internal borders in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is guaranteed under the EC Treaty.
The internal market is an area without internal borders in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is guaranteed under the EC Treaty.
The purpose of the proposal is to provide a common framework for the existing infrastructures for accreditation for the control of conformity assessment bodies, and market surveillance for the control of products and economic operators.
The purpose of the proposal is to provide a common framework for the existing infrastructures for accreditation for the control of conformity assessment bodies, and market surveillance for the control of products and economic operators.
The main objective is to safeguard the free movement of goods in a harmonised context.
The main objective is to safeguard the free movement of goods in a harmonised context.
Attaching central importance to the free movement of goods as one of the pillars of the internal market will only contribute to growth and competitiveness if the necessary consumer confidence exists.
Attaching central importance to the free movement of goods as one of the pillars of the internal market will only contribute to growth and competitiveness if the necessary consumer confidence exists.
Removal of barriers for economic operators and creation of favourable economic conditions for companies must always reflect a high level of consumer protection.
Removal of barriers for economic operators and creation of favourable economic conditions for companies must always reflect a high level of consumer protection.
High consumer health and safety standards and environmental protection are central concerns in any EU policy.
High consumer health and safety standards and environmental protection are central concerns in any EU policy.
Though the Rapporteur welcomes the proposals, he is of the opinion that there is room for further improvement.
Though the Rapporteur welcomes the proposals, he is of the opinion that there is room for further improvement.
He therefore proposes amendments along the following lines:
He therefore proposes amendments along the following lines:
Subject matter and scope
Subject matter and scope
The Rapporteur is concerned about the limited scope of the Regulation as to the product sectors covered.
The Rapporteur is concerned about the limited scope of the Regulation as to the product sectors covered.
The proposal offers an opportunity to establish a broader framework for both accreditation and market surveillance.
The proposal offers an opportunity to establish a broader framework for both accreditation and market surveillance.
That opportunity should be seized in order to minimise regulatory fragmentation, as well as in the interest of simplification and better regulation.
That opportunity should be seized in order to minimise regulatory fragmentation, as well as in the interest of simplification and better regulation.
The many and broad exclusions cover whole pieces of legislation, not just those parts that may be relevant.
The many and broad exclusions cover whole pieces of legislation, not just those parts that may be relevant.
The exclusions risk turning the Regulation into the exception instead of the framework intended.
The exclusions risk turning the Regulation into the exception instead of the framework intended.
To get rid of the exclusions avoids the need to revise the Regulation as and when new legislation is enacted.
To get rid of the exclusions avoids the need to revise the Regulation as and when new legislation is enacted.
Maintaining the exclusions opens the door to requests for even more exclusions, adding to the problem.
Maintaining the exclusions opens the door to requests for even more exclusions, adding to the problem.
Demands for exclusions could possibly be motivated more by various sector specific interests than by a concern to establish a coherent framework.
Demands for exclusions could possibly be motivated more by various sector specific interests than by a concern to establish a coherent framework.
Favouring a broad scope of application the Rapporteur therefore proposes to remove all the exclusions.
Favouring a broad scope of application the Rapporteur therefore proposes to remove all the exclusions.
Instead, the general principle that more specific rules have precedence over more general rules is restated.
Instead, the general principle that more specific rules have precedence over more general rules is restated.
This is a general and well-established principle of law found in many other pieces of Community legislation, including in the Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety (GPSD).
This is a general and well-established principle of law found in many other pieces of Community legislation, including in the Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety (GPSD).
Some definitions, such as "products", "Community harmonisation legislation", "entering the Community market", "conformity assessment", and "CE marking" have been introduced, whereby coherence of the definitions in the Regulation and the Decision must be ensured.
Some definitions, such as “products”, “Community harmonisation legislation”, “entering the Community market”, “conformity assessment”, and “CE marking” have been introduced, whereby coherence of the definitions in the Regulation and the Decision must be ensured.
Accreditation and conformity assessment
Accreditation and conformity assessment
Accreditation has not hitherto been regulated at Community level, although it has been and is practised in all Member States.
Accreditation has not hitherto been regulated at Community level, although it has been and is practised in all Member States.
As a result Member States have developed different (and divergent) systems and requirements.
As a result Member States have developed different (and divergent) systems and requirements.
The proposal sets out a comprehensive framework for accreditation and lays down at Community level the principles for its work and organisation.
The proposal sets out a comprehensive framework for accreditation and lays down at Community level the principles for its work and organisation.
The Rapporteur strongly supports the idea to leave accreditation as a national responsibility, whereby national accreditation bodies have to act as public authorities and in the public interest.
The Rapporteur strongly supports the idea to leave accreditation as a national responsibility, whereby national accreditation bodies have to act as public authorities and in the public interest.
Consequently competition between accreditation bodies is excluded in the compulsory area.
Consequently competition between accreditation bodies is excluded in the compulsory area.
With regard to the scope of accreditation the Rapporteur is of the opinion that it should be as wide as possible to prevent the creation of several systems.
With regard to the scope of accreditation the Rapporteur is of the opinion that it should be as wide as possible to prevent the creation of several systems.
As a result the confidence in accreditation would be strengthened and confusion among economic operators avoided.
As a result the confidence in accreditation would be strengthened and confusion among economic operators avoided.
Regarding operation of accreditation, certain rights of the respective authorities have been strengthened in order to maintain high accreditation standards.
Regarding operation of accreditation, certain rights of the respective authorities have been strengthened in order to maintain high accreditation standards.
Role of European cooperation for accreditation (EA)
Role of European cooperation for accreditation (EA)
The Rapporteur is of the opinion that to enshrine the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) in the Regulation is problematic in so far as, firstly, the EA is an entity under private law, secondly it has not been decided yet formally whether the EA will be the organisation in question or for how long, and thirdly in case of possible changes to the corporate structure of the EA, such as a change of name or if it was to be put into liquidation or merge.
The Rapporteur is of the opinion that to enshrine the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) in the Regulation is problematic in so far as, firstly, the EA is an entity under private law, secondly it has not been decided yet formally whether the EA will be the organisation in question or for how long, and thirdly in case of possible changes to the corporate structure of the EA, such as a change of name or if it was to be put into liquidation or merge.
The Rapporteur does not at all question the competence of the EA, which it has sufficiently proved over many years, but he believes that the Regulation should refer to a body to be recognised upon meeting certain criteria.
The Rapporteur does not at all question the competence of the EA, which it has sufficiently proved over many years, but he believes that the Regulation should refer to a body to be recognised upon meeting certain criteria.
As a consequence the Commission would have to recognise a body which satisfies the requirements of Annex A after consultation with the Member States, and come to a framework agreement to contains, inter alia, provisions for the supervision of the body.
As a consequence the Commission would have to recognise a body which satisfies the requirements of Annex A after consultation with the Member States, and come to a framework agreement to contains, inter alia, provisions for the supervision of the body.
Market surveillance and customs authorities
Market surveillance and customs authorities
The general comments under subject matter and scope above apply with particular force to market surveillance.
The general comments under subject matter and scope above apply with particular force to market surveillance.
The Rapporteur sees no good reason to establish a framework for market surveillance that is riddled with exclusions.
The Rapporteur sees no good reason to establish a framework for market surveillance that is riddled with exclusions.
A framework for market surveillance should by its very nature be broad.
A framework for market surveillance should by its very nature be broad.
For example, the GPSD should be included in the framework as the borderline between products for consumer use and for professional use is blurred, as the exclusion would mean unnecessary complication, and as it may lead to unclear procedures and responsibilities.
For example, the GPSD should be included in the framework as the borderline between products for consumer use and for professional use is blurred, as the exclusion would mean unnecessary complication, and as it may lead to unclear procedures and responsibilities.
Also the exclusion of 15 entire Directives and Regulations under Article 13(3) would contradict the establishment of an efficient market surveillance based on EU-wide rules.
Also the exclusion of 15 entire Directives and Regulations under Article 13(3) would contradict the establishment of an efficient market surveillance based on EU-wide rules.
However, it would have to be guaranteed that the market surveillance measures will be adequate for individual products, and the respective specific regulations and practices be maintained.
However, it would have to be guaranteed that the market surveillance measures will be adequate for individual products, and the respective specific regulations and practices be maintained.
This is achieved by the general principle that specific rules applying to different sectors have precedence over the more general rules of the framework provided for hereby.
This is achieved by the general principle that specific rules applying to different sectors have precedence over the more general rules of the framework provided for hereby.
The Rapporteur strengthens the provisions for the obligations of the Member States as regards the establishment, implementation and periodical update of their market surveillance programmes.
The Rapporteur strengthens the provisions for the obligations of the Member States as regards the establishment, implementation and periodical update of their market surveillance programmes.
Review and assessment procedures are reinforced.
Review and assessment procedures are reinforced.
Communication between the Member States and the Commission, and information to the public, is emphasised.
Communication between the Member States and the Commission, and information to the public, is emphasised.
The Rapporteur proposes focussing the market surveillance effort on those products representing a serious risk.
The Rapporteur proposes focussing the market surveillance effort on those products representing a serious risk.
Provisions regarding products presenting a serious risk have been amended and clarified especially as regards the risk assessment.
Provisions regarding products presenting a serious risk have been amended and clarified especially as regards the risk assessment.
In order to increase the effectiveness of market surveillance across the EU the Rapporteur believes that common initiatives with third countries and an improved co-operation with their respective authorities would contribute to a better understanding of the complex EU rules and regulations, and also encourage third country authorities to take measures for the prevention of illegal exports into the EU.
In order to increase the effectiveness of market surveillance across the EU the Rapporteur believes that common initiatives with third countries and an improved co-operation with their respective authorities would contribute to a better understanding of the complex EU rules and regulations, and also encourage third country authorities to take measures for the prevention of illegal exports into the EU.
Regarding control of products entering the Community market the Rapporteur is of the opinion that co-ordination and exchange of information between customs and market surveillance authorities have to be strengthened.
Regarding control of products entering the Community market the Rapporteur is of the opinion that co-ordination and exchange of information between customs and market surveillance authorities have to be strengthened.
The volume of third country products entering the Community market is constantly growing, and simultaneously the significance of the controls of the customs authorities is increasing.
The volume of third country products entering the Community market is constantly growing, and simultaneously the significance of the controls of the customs authorities is increasing.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the customs authorities they should receive the necessary information about dangerous products from the respective market surveillance authorities well in advance.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the customs authorities they should receive the necessary information about dangerous products from the respective market surveillance authorities well in advance.