natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Your rapporteur nevertheless takes the view that to impose a single standard by legal means would not be the right solution, but points out that Parliament does not approve of market intervention alone to resolve the problem of interactivity.
Your rapporteur nevertheless takes the view that to impose a single standard by legal means would not be the right solution, but points out that Parliament does not approve of market intervention alone to resolve the problem of interactivity.
He considers that, in the spirit of Parliament’s previous reports on the transition from analogue to digital, given the role of television in a globalised society, the technical and legislative choices relating to interoperability must not be solely of an economic nature but also of a social, cultural and political nature; he also stresses that attention should be focused first and foremost on citizen-viewers’ interests in relation to financial aspects, access, pluralism and cultural diversity.
He considers that, in the spirit of Parliament’s previous reports on the transition from analogue to digital, given the role of television in a globalised society, the technical and legislative choices relating to interoperability must not be solely of an economic nature but also of a social, cultural and political nature; he also stresses that attention should be focused first and foremost on citizen-viewers’ interests in relation to financial aspects, access, pluralism and cultural diversity.
He shares the Commission’s view that it would be advisable to continue promoting open standards developed by European standards bodies in relation to the switchover to digital and the interoperability of services, and encourages the Commission to further its action by promoting European digital TV standards in other parts of the world.
He shares the Commission’s view that it would be advisable to continue promoting open standards developed by European standards bodies in relation to the switchover to digital and the interoperability of services, and encourages the Commission to further its action by promoting European digital TV standards in other parts of the world.
As regards the involvement of the Committee on Culture and Education in audiovisual matters, your rapporteur would stress that the new technologies should first and foremost allow pluralist information and quality programmes to be broadcast, ensuring cultural diversity and accessible to an ever increasing number of citizens.
As regards the involvement of the Committee on Culture and Education in audiovisual matters, your rapporteur would stress that the new technologies should first and foremost allow pluralist information and quality programmes to be broadcast, ensuring cultural diversity and accessible to an ever increasing number of citizens.
He would also point out that respect for pluralism of information and diversity of content is not automatically guaranteed by technological progress but must be implemented by the national and European public authorities through an active, steadfast and vigilant policy.
He would also point out that respect for pluralism of information and diversity of content is not automatically guaranteed by technological progress but must be implemented by the national and European public authorities through an active, steadfast and vigilant policy.
Lastly, your rapporteur would stress the importance of educating people about the media and technology so that the digital divide does not become wider.
Lastly, your rapporteur would stress the importance of educating people about the media and technology so that the digital divide does not become wider.
The expansion of digital TV will profoundly change the way in which viewers use the services offered to them.
The expansion of digital TV will profoundly change the way in which viewers use the services offered to them.
New niche markets and special programmes will be created.
New niche markets and special programmes will be created.
Users’ wishes will therefore become paramount for market development.
Users’ wishes will therefore become paramount for market development.
It would thus be advisable to focus on those users so that they can make fully informed choices and are effectively able to benefit in full from the potential of the new technologies.
It would thus be advisable to focus on those users so that they can make fully informed choices and are effectively able to benefit in full from the potential of the new technologies.
on the interoperability of digital interactive television services
on the interoperability of digital interactive television services
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy calls on the Committee on Culture and Education, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. whereas digital television can make use of new media technology to provide information services and can therefore enhance social cohesion and help bring everyone within the information society,
A. whereas digital television can make use of new media technology to provide information services and can therefore enhance social cohesion and help bring everyone within the information society,
B. whereas digital interactive television services include multilingual subtitles, enabling digital television to enhance intercultural dialogue and lifelong learning,
B. whereas digital interactive television services include multilingual subtitles, enabling digital television to enhance intercultural dialogue and lifelong learning,
C. whereas, to date, the development of digital interactive television services at Community level has been limited,
C. whereas, to date, the development of digital interactive television services at Community level has been limited,
D. whereas the digital television sector in the European Union already benefits from a wide range of robust European standards,
D. whereas the digital television sector in the European Union already benefits from a wide range of robust European standards,
E. whereas the move from analogue to digital television is making it possible to release spectrum capacity and develop new technologies and innovative solutions which boost European competitiveness in this sector,
E. whereas the move from analogue to digital television is making it possible to release spectrum capacity and develop new technologies and innovative solutions which boost European competitiveness in this sector,
Stresses that the use of interoperable technical solutions which are neutral from a technological point of view provides a way of promoting investment and innovation in this sector, thereby stimulating competition and safeguarding consumer choice;
Stresses that the use of interoperable technical solutions which are neutral from a technological point of view provides a way of promoting investment and innovation in this sector, thereby stimulating competition and safeguarding consumer choice;
Agrees that the extension of digital interactive television services throughout the EU does not necessitate binding technical standards and that consumer interests are best protected by the continuing provision of support for initiatives to standardise the sector and the voluntary application of such standards;
Agrees that the extension of digital interactive television services throughout the EU does not necessitate binding technical standards and that consumer interests are best protected by the continuing provision of support for initiatives to standardise the sector and the voluntary application of such standards;
Stresses that the establishment of digital platforms is essential to maintaining a common public media zone following the abandonment of analogue technology and calls on the Member States to promote the provision of wireless digital interactive television services with guaranteed reception from all proprietary platforms;
Stresses that the establishment of digital platforms is essential to maintaining a common public media zone following the abandonment of analogue technology and calls on the Member States to promote the provision of wireless digital interactive television services with guaranteed reception from all proprietary platforms;
Calls on the Member States to speed up the transfer to digital television, taking account of market demand and topographical and regional demographic factors, and calls on those Member States which have not yet drawn up a national plan for the full switchover to digital television to do so by the end of 2008;
Calls on the Member States to speed up the transfer to digital television, taking account of market demand and topographical and regional demographic factors, and calls on those Member States which have not yet drawn up a national plan for the full switchover to digital television to do so by the end of 2008;
Stresses the importance of ensuring technological neutrality and developing successful business models;
Stresses the importance of ensuring technological neutrality and developing successful business models;
Stresses the importance of voluntary agreements between digital television service providers on the establishment of a number of common technical specifications for the implementation of standards adopted by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute;
Stresses the importance of voluntary agreements between digital television service providers on the establishment of a number of common technical specifications for the implementation of standards adopted by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute;
Stresses that, in view of the example of the so-called submarine patents, which was seen five years after Multimedia Home Platforms were first introduced, it is reasonable that license fees be fair and made explicitly known at the start of the development of any open standard, in order to ensure its success;
Stresses that, in view of the example of the so-called submarine patents, which was seen five years after Multimedia Home Platforms were first introduced, it is reasonable that license fees be fair and made explicitly known at the start of the development of any open standard, in order to ensure its success;
Considers it essential to ensure the security of users and the protection of their personal data and privacy and stresses the importance of consumer confidence in digital interactive television services;
Considers it essential to ensure the security of users and the protection of their personal data and privacy and stresses the importance of consumer confidence in digital interactive television services;
Considers that, in the transfer to digital television, it is necessary to be alert to rises in the prices of television receiving equipment and to how they might affect the accessibility of such equipment for consumers; insists that measures taken by the Member States that lead to the expansion of digital interactive television services must comply with the rules on state aid;
Considers that, in the transfer to digital television, it is necessary to be alert to rises in the prices of television receiving equipment and to how they might affect the accessibility of such equipment for consumers; insists that measures taken by the Member States that lead to the expansion of digital interactive television services must comply with the rules on state aid;
Considers that the governments of the Member States can identify ways in which digital television can be used to communicate with the public and provide public services and accordingly encourages the Commission to promote an exchange of good practices between local, regional and national authorities;
Considers that the governments of the Member States can identify ways in which digital television can be used to communicate with the public and provide public services and accordingly encourages the Commission to promote an exchange of good practices between local, regional and national authorities;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to inform the public about future developments in digital interactive television services, and recommends that digital television service providers take active steps to inform users about existing interactive services;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to inform the public about future developments in digital interactive television services, and recommends that digital television service providers take active steps to inform users about existing interactive services;
Takes the view that the coordinated development of digital television at Community level is essential if users are to benefit from the advantages of the internal market and in order to reduce the price of television receiving equipment and achieve greater penetration by digital interactive television services; accordingly, urges the Commission to support the Member States in drawing up a common plan of action at Community level;
Takes the view that the coordinated development of digital television at Community level is essential if users are to benefit from the advantages of the internal market and in order to reduce the price of television receiving equipment and achieve greater penetration by digital interactive television services; accordingly, urges the Commission to support the Member States in drawing up a common plan of action at Community level;
Urges the Commission to continue to actively promote the introduction of open European digital television standards in all regions of the world and to encourage international cooperation in this area, thereby ensuring the widest possible access to digital content;
Urges the Commission to continue to actively promote the introduction of open European digital television standards in all regions of the world and to encourage international cooperation in this area, thereby ensuring the widest possible access to digital content;
Calls on the Member States to establish mechanisms which guarantee a non-discriminatory structure for electronic programme guides that can guide users through the digital service offer.
Calls on the Member States to establish mechanisms which guarantee a non-discriminatory structure for electronic programme guides that can guide users through the digital service offer.
Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Jan Březina, Philippe Busquin, Jerzy Buzek, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Silvia Ciornei, Lena Ek, Nicole Fontaine, Adam Gierek, Umberto Guidoni, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Mary Honeyball, Ján Hudacký, Romana Jordan Cizelj, Anne Laperrouze, Pia Elda Locatelli, Eluned Morgan, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Mechtild Rothe, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Patrizia Toia, Claude Turmes, Nikolaos Vakalis, Alejo Vidal-Quadras
Alexander Alvaro, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Erika Mann, Lambert van Nistelrooij, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev
Alexander Alvaro, Pilar Ayuso, Ivo Belet, Avril Doyle, Robert Goebbels, Françoise Grossetête, Erika Mann, Lambert van Nistelrooij, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Vladimir Urutchev
Manuel António dos Santos, Radu Ţîrle
Manuel António dos Santos, Radu Ţîrle
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Věra Flasarová, Claire Gibault, Vasco Graça Moura, Lissy Gröner, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Ljudmila Novak, Doris Pack, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Karin Resetarits, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
Maria Badia i Cutchet, Giovanni Berlinguer, Guy Bono, Věra Flasarová, Claire Gibault, Vasco Graça Moura, Lissy Gröner, Ruth Hieronymi, Manolis Mavrommatis, Ljudmila Novak, Doris Pack, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Karin Resetarits, Hannu Takkula, Helga Trüpel, Henri Weber, Thomas Wise, Tomáš Zatloukal
Elisabeth Morin, Nina Škottová, Ewa Tomaszewska
Elisabeth Morin, Nina Škottová, Ewa Tomaszewska
PE 386.393v02-00
PE 386.393v02-00
Относно приноса на данъчната и митническата политика към Лисабонската стратегия
on the contribution of taxation and customs policies to the Lisbon Strategy
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета и Европейския парламент "Приносът на данъчната и митническата политика към Лисабонската стратегия" (СOM(2005)0532),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on 'The contribution of taxation and customs policies to the Lisbon Strategy' ( COM(2005)0532 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Координиране на разпоредбите на държавите-членки в сферата на прякото данъчно облагане в рамките на вътрешния пазар" (СOM(2006)0823),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Coordinating Member States' direct tax systems in the internal market' ( COM(2006)0823 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Изходно данъчно облагане при напускане на страната и необходимостта от координиране на данъчните политики на държавите-членки" (СOM(2006)0825),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Exit taxation and the need for coordination of Member States' tax policies' ( COM(2006)0825 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Пътища към по-ефективно използване на данъчните облекчения в полза на научноизследователска и развойна дейност" (СOM(2006)0728),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Towards a more effective use of tax incentives in favour of R&D' ( COM(2006)0728 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Изпълнение на Лисабонската програма на Общността: постигнати успехи и по-нататъшни действия към обща консолидирана корпоративна данъчна основа (CCCTB)" (СOM(2006)0157),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: progress to date and next steps towards a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB)' ( COM(2006)0157 ),
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Данъчни загуби при трансгранични казуси" (СOM(2006)0824),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Tax treatment of losses in cross-border situations' ( COM(2006)0824 ),
– като се позова на своята Резолюция от 10 март 2005 г. за предложение на директива на Съвета за изменение на Директива 90/434/EИО от 23 юли 1990 г. относно общата данъчна система за данъчно облагане, приложима спрямо сливанията, разделянията, прехвърлянията на активи и замените на акции по отношение на дружества от различни държави-членки
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2005 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States
– като се позова на своята Резолюция от 13 декември 2005 г. относно корпоративното подоходно облагане в Европейския съюз: единна консолидирана корпоративна данъчна основа
– having regard to its resolution of 13 December 2005 on taxation of undertakings in the European Union: a common consolidated corporate tax base
– като се позова на неофициалното заседание на Съвета "Икономика и финанси" от 10 и 11 септември 2004 г. и на неофициалното заседание на Съвета "Икономика и финанси" от 7 и 8 април 2006 г.,
– having regard to the informal meeting of Economics and Finance Ministers (Ecofin Council) of 10 and 11 September 2004 and the informal Ecofin Council meeting of 7 and 8 April 2006,
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията до Съвета, Европейския парламент и Европейския икономически и социален комитет "Данъчно облагане по място на главното управление – схема на пилотен проект за отстраняване на данъчните препятствия пред малките и средни предприятия във вътрешния пазар "(СOM(2005)0702),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on 'Tackling the corporation tax obstacles of small and medium-sized enterprises in the internal market - outline of a possible home state taxation pilot scheme' ( COM(2005)0702 ),
– като взе предвид допитването на Комисията относно данъците в ЕС
– having regard to the Commission's 'European Tax Survey'
Допитване относно данъците в ЕС, работен документ № 3/2004 (SEC (2004)1128/2). от 10 септември 2004 г.,
EU tax survey, working paper No 3/2004 ( SEC(2004)1128 /2). of 10 September 2004,
– като взе предвид заключенията на Европейския съвет от Лисабон от 23 и 24 март 2000 г., на Европейския съвет от Стокхолм от 23 и 24 март 2001 г., на Европейския съвет от Барселона от 15 и 16 март 2002 г. и на Европейския съвет от Брюксел от 22 и 23 март 2005 г., от 15 и 16 декември 2005 г. и от 23 и 24 март 2006 г.,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Presidency of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001, the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002 and the Brussels European Councils of 22 and 23 March 2005, 15 and 16 December 2005 and 23 and 24 March 2006,
– като взе предвид доклада на Организацията за икономическо сътрудничество и развитие (ОИСР) от 1998 г. за вредната данъчна конкуренция,
– having regard to the OECD report of 1998 on harmful tax competition,
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията от 2006 г. озаглавен "Структури на данъчното облагане в Европейския съюз: 1995-2004,
– having regard to the 2006 Commission report: Structures of taxation in the European Union: 1995-2004,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по икономически и парични въпроси ( A6-0391/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0391/2007 ),
А. като има предвид, че националните данъчни системи в нарастваща степен трябва да вземат предвид на глобализацията и изпитват необходимостта от натрупване на човешки капитал в едно общество, основаващо се на знания, което води до нарастване на обществените разходи;
A. whereas the fact that national tax systems need increasingly to take into account the globalisation of the economy and the need to accumulate human capital in a knowledge-based society causes a surge in public spending,