natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. изразява съгласие с оценката на Комисията, че функционирането на схемите за гарантиране на депозити би могло да се подобри чрез саморегулиращи мерки, особено презгранични;
Supports the assessment of the Commission that the operation of deposit-guarantee schemes might be improved through self-regulatory, particularly cross-border, measures;
16. подчертава, че тенденцията за заместване на дъщерните дружества с филиали в банковия сектор е също свързана с нови изисквания за сътрудничество между органите на държавите-членки, които са засегнати от кризисни ситуации;
Clearly states that the trend towards replacing subsidiaries with branch structures in the banking sector is also linked to new requirements for cooperation between the authorities in the Member States concerned in crisis situations;
20. счита за препоръчително предприемането на по-изчерпателно изследване с цел определянето на общ метод за оценка на риска;
Considers that it would be advisable to embark on the more exhaustive study necessary in order to determine a common risk assessment method;
At the end of 2006, the Commission submitted a communication on the review of the 1994 directive on deposit-guarantee schemes.
At the end of 2006, the Commission submitted a communication on the review of the 1994 directive on deposit-guarantee schemes.
More than a decade after its transposition into national law, the Commission reviewed the directive in order to ascertain the extent to which the existing rules still served their original purpose in view of the increasing integration of financial markets and cross-border mergers of credit institutions.
More than a decade after its transposition into national law, the Commission reviewed the directive in order to ascertain the extent to which the existing rules still served their original purpose in view of the increasing integration of financial markets and cross-border mergers of credit institutions.
The consultation process highlighted, in particular, the differences in how the systems were financed, and the considerable differences between the guarantees given to depositors in terms of level and scope, as posing problems for or obstacles to market integration or cross-border cooperation.
The consultation process highlighted, in particular, the differences in how the systems were financed, and the considerable differences between the guarantees given to depositors in terms of level and scope, as posing problems for or obstacles to market integration or cross-border cooperation.
The communication submitted by the Commission was concerned with the following areas:
The communication submitted by the Commission was concerned with the following areas:
· Definition of deposits and scope of coverage,
· Definition of deposits and scope of coverage,
· The de minimis clause,
· The de minimis clause,
· Topping-up arrangements,
· Topping-up arrangements,
· Exchange of information,
· Exchange of information,
· Risk-based contributions to the deposit-guarantee schemes,
· Risk-based contributions to the deposit-guarantee schemes,
· Transfer and refund of contributions to the guarantee schemes,
· Transfer and refund of contributions to the guarantee schemes,
· Consumer information and advertising,
· Consumer information and advertising,
· Deadline for reimbursing/reducing the impact on depositors,
· Deadline for reimbursing/reducing the impact on depositors,
· Pan-European / Regional deposit-guarantee schemes,
· Pan-European / Regional deposit-guarantee schemes,
· Statistical obligations.
· Statistical obligations.
The overall conclusion from the Commission's investigations was that there was no need for legislative intervention at this point in time; that further studies and cost estimates would be required before making the requisite amendments; and that the operation of deposit-guarantee schemes in Europe, and especially in cross-border situations, can best be achieved through an improvement in the application of the existing rules and a change in how the parties involved operate.
The overall conclusion from the Commission's investigations was that there was no need for legislative intervention at this point in time; that further studies and cost estimates would be required before making the requisite amendments; and that the operation of deposit-guarantee schemes in Europe, and especially in cross-border situations, can best be achieved through an improvement in the application of the existing rules and a change in how the parties involved operate.
The Commission identified the clarification of burden sharing in a cross-border crisis situation as a focus for future work.
The Commission identified the clarification of burden sharing in a cross-border crisis situation as a focus for future work.
The European Parliament intends, by means of this report, to make it clear that deposit-guarantee schemes are considered to be an important part of our financial market system, and that their operation should continuously be improved.
The European Parliament intends, by means of this report, to make it clear that deposit-guarantee schemes are considered to be an important part of our financial market system, and that their operation should continuously be improved.
The report considers questions concerning the minimum guarantee level and a tightening of procedures by taking advantage of improved communications technology, and focuses on the issue of crisis management.
The report considers questions concerning the minimum guarantee level and a tightening of procedures by taking advantage of improved communications technology, and focuses on the issue of crisis management.
Guarantee schemes are now being faced with more demands, particularly as a result of increasing market integration, and these must be responded to if the stability of financial markets is to be ensured.
Guarantee schemes are now being faced with more demands, particularly as a result of increasing market integration, and these must be responded to if the stability of financial markets is to be ensured.
Parliament also calls, by means of the report, for integration with cross-border crisis management in the area of deposit guaranteeing and in this context supports the involvement of working groups from the Economic and Finance Committee and the Financial Services Committee with regard to relevant issues.
Parliament also calls, by means of the report, for integration with cross-border crisis management in the area of deposit guaranteeing and in this context supports the involvement of working groups from the Economic and Finance Committee and the Financial Services Committee with regard to relevant issues.
The European Parliament considers that crisis management should rest on the foundations of improved early risk detection, better defined and planned procedures of interaction between all parties involved, and clarification of the point at which burdens are to be shared.
The European Parliament considers that crisis management should rest on the foundations of improved early risk detection, better defined and planned procedures of interaction between all parties involved, and clarification of the point at which burdens are to be shared.
Differences between systems and the variety of parties involved in the public and private sectors must be taken into consideration.
Differences between systems and the variety of parties involved in the public and private sectors must be taken into consideration.
In this context it must also be made clear that the principal responsibility for risk limitation must remain with the banks.
In this context it must also be made clear that the principal responsibility for risk limitation must remain with the banks.
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Slavi Binev, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Andrea Losco, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Manuel António dos Santos, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Sahra Wagenknecht
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Slavi Binev, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Ieke van den Burg, Christian Ehler, Jonathan Evans, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Othmar Karas, Piia-Noora Kauppi, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Andrea Losco, Gay Mitchell, Cristobal Montoro Romero, John Purvis, Alexander Radwan, Eoin Ryan, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Manuel António dos Santos, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Sahra Wagenknecht
Jamila Madeira, Cornelis Visser
Jamila Madeira, Cornelis Visser
относно искането за защита на имунитета и привилегиите на Renato Brunetta
on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Renato Brunetta
PE 396.568v02-00
PE 396.568v02-00
– като взе предвид искането на Renato Brunetta от 18 януари 2007 г. за защита на неговия имунитет във връзка с образуваното срещу него гражданско производство пред Окръжния съд в Милано, обявено на пленарно заседание на 31 януари 2007 г.,
– having regard to the request by Renato Brunetta for defence of his immunity in connection with civil proceedings brought against him before the District Court in Milan, of 18 January 2007, announced in plenary sitting on 31 January 2007,
– като изслуша Renato Brunetta, съгласно член 7, параграф 3 от своя правилник,
– having heard Renato Brunetta in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид членове 9 и 10 от Протокола за привилегиите и имунитетите на Европейските общности от 8 април 1965 г. и член 6, параграф 2 от Акта за избирането на представители в Асамблеята чрез преки всеобщи избори от 20 септември 1976 г.,
– having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
Дело 101/63, Wagner/Fohrmann и Krier, Сборник от 1964 г., стр. 195 и дело 149/85, Wybot/Faure и други, Сборник от 1986 г., стр. 2391. ,
Case 101/63 Wagner v Fohrmann and Krier [1964] ECR 195 and Case 149/85 Wybot v Faure and others [1986] ECR 2391. of the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси ( A6‑0449/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0449/2007 ),
At the sitting of 31 January 2007, the President of Parliament announced that he had received a request for the defence of the parliamentary immunity of Renato Brunetta by letter of 18 January 2007, which was forwarded to the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
At the sitting of 31 January 2007, the President of Parliament announced that he had received a request for the defence of the parliamentary immunity of Renato Brunetta by letter of 18 January 2007, which was forwarded to the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure.
The request relates to the civil proceedings brought by Hera S.p.A. against Mr Brunetta, along with other defendants, and currently pending before the District Court of Milan.
The request relates to the civil proceedings brought by Hera S.p.A. against Mr Brunetta, along with other defendants, and currently pending before the District Court of Milan.
Hera S.p.A. is an Italian holding company operating in the field of public utilities in the Emilia-Romagna region.
Hera S.p.A. is an Italian holding company operating in the field of public utilities in the Emilia-Romagna region.
It is a public-private company whose 59% of shares is controlled by a group of local municipalities and the remaining 41% belongs to a group of (public) bank foundations and cooperative firms.
It is a public-private company whose 59% of shares is controlled by a group of local municipalities and the remaining 41% belongs to a group of (public) bank foundations and cooperative firms.
By the writ of pleadings of 14 September 2006, Hera S.p.A summoned Renato Brunetta and other defendants to appear before the Cles section of the Trento District Court, so that the latter might declare them jointly liable for the material published in a book forming part of the " I documenti di Panorama" series, entitled 'Red Capitalism - Investigating The Cooperatives, From Shares To Speculation' .
By the writ of pleadings of 14 September 2006, Hera S.p.A summoned Renato Brunetta and other defendants to appear before the Cles section of the Trento District Court, so that the latter might declare them jointly liable for the material published in a book forming part of the " I documenti di Panorama" series, entitled 'Red Capitalism - Investigating The Cooperatives, From Shares To Speculation' .
All the defendants duly filed an appearance before the court, challenging the justification for the requests made by the complainant and submitting the preliminary objection that the court seized had no local jurisdiction.
All the defendants duly filed an appearance before the court, challenging the justification for the requests made by the complainant and submitting the preliminary objection that the court seized had no local jurisdiction.
At the hearing of 20 February 2007, the complainant accepted the plea of lack of jurisdiction and, recognising the jurisdiction of the Milan District Court, on 19 March 2007 notified the defendants a statement on resumption of proceedings before that court.
At the hearing of 20 February 2007, the complainant accepted the plea of lack of jurisdiction and, recognising the jurisdiction of the Milan District Court, on 19 March 2007 notified the defendants a statement on resumption of proceedings before that court.
In its writ of summons, Hera gave the following extracts of the abovementioned book, taken from the introduction written by Mr Brunetta, as examples of defamatory statements:
In its writ of summons, Hera gave the following extracts of the abovementioned book, taken from the introduction written by Mr Brunetta, as examples of defamatory statements:
- 'On the basis of these findings, we shall address the reasons which have led to important sectors of the cooperative movement with links to the Left Democrats becoming implemental in the emergence of 'red capitalism', the degeneration of the cooperative economy into a partisan movement.
- 'On the basis of these findings, we shall address the reasons which have led to important sectors of the cooperative movement with links to the Left Democrats becoming implemental in the emergence of 'red capitalism', the degeneration of the cooperative economy into a partisan movement.
In a word, a monster' (page 6);
In a word, a monster' (page 6);
- The recent events involving Unipol, and others described in the course of this book, show that the main victims of the cooperatives which have spun out of control are their members.
- The recent events involving Unipol, and others described in the course of this book, show that the main victims of the cooperatives which have spun out of control are their members.
When a cooperative expands beyond a certain size, its members, unlike shareholders in public limited liability companies, have few - or no - powers to effectively control management.
When a cooperative expands beyond a certain size, its members, unlike shareholders in public limited liability companies, have few - or no - powers to effectively control management.
Consequently, the management, which is not subject to control by those owning the capital, becomes self-referential, behaves exactly like a speculator without the risks incurred by speculators, and takes advantage of the absence of the usual controls and practices to conceal its own strategies and hide from its members the benefits - including personal benefits - it can obtain' (page 15);
Consequently, the management, which is not subject to control by those owning the capital, becomes self-referential, behaves exactly like a speculator without the risks incurred by speculators, and takes advantage of the absence of the usual controls and practices to conceal its own strategies and hide from its members the benefits - including personal benefits - it can obtain' (page 15);
- 'Red capitalism' is part of FREE's efforts to denounce the "red" cooperatives' "hidden member" technique and restore the original rules and raison d'être of the cooperative movement' (page 15);
- 'Red capitalism' is part of FREE's efforts to denounce the "red" cooperatives' "hidden member" technique and restore the original rules and raison d'être of the cooperative movement' (page 15);
- 'FREE's "Red capitalism" shows that competition rules have been altered and a political party has taken control of the cooperatives as a "hidden member"' (page 15).
- 'FREE's "Red capitalism" shows that competition rules have been altered and a political party has taken control of the cooperatives as a "hidden member"' (page 15).
Rule 6 - Waiver of immunity:
Rule 6 - Waiver of immunity:
Rule 7 - Procedure on immunity:
Rule 7 - Procedure on immunity:
Article 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities provides that Members of the European Parliament have absolute immunity from legal proceedings " in respect of opinions expressed ... in the performance of their duties ".
Article 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities provides that Members of the European Parliament have absolute immunity from legal proceedings " in respect of opinions expressed ... in the performance of their duties ".
As a matter of fact, in his statements reported by the writ of summons filed by Hera S.p.A., Mr Brunetta merely commented on facts in the public domain which had a European political dimension as they were directly linked to Unipol’s bid to take over the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) and the European Commission was carrying out the checks required under Community law with regard to the legality of that takeover bid.
As a matter of fact, in his statements reported by the writ of summons filed by Hera S.p.A., Mr Brunetta merely commented on facts in the public domain which had a European political dimension as they were directly linked to Unipol’s bid to take over the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) and the European Commission was carrying out the checks required under Community law with regard to the legality of that takeover bid.
Furthermore, as a Member of the European Parliament and full professor of Economics, Mr Brunetta only stressed the market failure resulting from to the links existing between public-private companies, cooperatives and political parties which create a de facto monopoly and may therefore jeopardise the functioning of the internal market as far as consumers' protection and fair competition are concerned.
Furthermore, as a Member of the European Parliament and full professor of Economics, Mr Brunetta only stressed the market failure resulting from to the links existing between public-private companies, cooperatives and political parties which create a de facto monopoly and may therefore jeopardise the functioning of the internal market as far as consumers' protection and fair competition are concerned.
The case of Hera S.p.A. was just a paradigmatic example of how this economic paradox exists and works.
The case of Hera S.p.A. was just a paradigmatic example of how this economic paradox exists and works.
Defining such a situation as an "economic monster" is not at all defamatory, as the word " monster " comes from the Latin expression " monstrum " which only means "extraordinary", "something against nature".
Defining such a situation as an "economic monster" is not at all defamatory, as the word " monster " comes from the Latin expression " monstrum " which only means "extraordinary", "something against nature".
The message that Mr Brunetta intended to give to his readers was nothing more than the description, from a merely economic point of view, of the existing anomalies of the Italian market, which seem to prevent Italy from fully attaining the objectives of the internal market.
The message that Mr Brunetta intended to give to his readers was nothing more than the description, from a merely economic point of view, of the existing anomalies of the Italian market, which seem to prevent Italy from fully attaining the objectives of the internal market.
In describing and criticising the deviations of the cooperatives' system, he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
In describing and criticising the deviations of the cooperatives' system, he was carrying out his duty as a Member of Parliament in expressing his opinion on a matter of public interest to his constituents.
In short, Mr Brunetta was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament.
In short, Mr Brunetta was simply doing his job as a Member of Parliament.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an Institution.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an Institution.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Renato Brunetta be defended.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Renato Brunetta be defended.
11 0 0
11 0 0
Carlo Casini, Cristian Dumitrescu, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Carlo Casini, Cristian Dumitrescu, Giuseppe Gargani, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Kurt Lechner
Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Kurt Lechner
относно предложението за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно приложимото право към договорните задължения (Рим I)
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)
PE 374.427v02-00
PE 374.427v02-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................47
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................42
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯТА ПО ЗАЕТОСТ И СОЦИАЛНИ ВЪПРОСИ.................50
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............44
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2005)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0650 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2, член 61, буква в) и член 67, параграф 5 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които Комисията представи предложението на Парламента ( C6‑0441/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0441/2005 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси и становището на комисията по заетост и социални въпроси ( A6‑0450/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0450/2007 ),