natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The above articles concern sensitive issues related to the functioning, effectiveness, credibility and transparency of Artemis.
The above articles concern sensitive issues related to the functioning, effectiveness, credibility and transparency of Artemis.
Any change requires an Institutional Decision.
Any change requires an Institutional Decision.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 2, буква а)
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 2, point (a)
а) „информация“ означава всеки чертеж, спецификация, фотография, образец, модел, процес, процедура, указание, софтуер, доклад, статия или всякаква друга техническа и/или търговска информация, умение (ноу-хау), данни или документи от всякакъв характер, включително устна информация, различни от защитените с „права върху интелектуалната собственост“ (ПИС);
(a) “Information” shall mean any drawings, specifications, photographs, samples, models, processes, procedures, instructions, software, reports, papers, or any other technical and/or commercial information, know-how, data or documents of any kind, including oral information, other than subject matter protected by "Intellectual Property Rights” (IPR);
а)„информация“ означава всеки чертеж, спецификация, фотография, образец, модел, процес, процедура, указание, софтуер, доклад, статия или всякаква друга техническа и/или търговска информация, умение (ноу-хау), данни или документи от всякакъв характер, включително устна информация, различни от „права върху интелектуалната собственост“ (ПИС);
(a) “Information” shall mean any drawings, specifications, photographs, samples, models, processes, procedures, instructions, software, reports, papers, or any other technical and/or commercial information, know-how, data or documents of any kind, including oral information, other than "Intellectual Property Rights” (IPR);
Without our deletion, the definition might become unclear, since a lot of “Information” might be material covered by IPR.
Without our deletion, the definition might become unclear, since a lot of “Information” might be material covered by IPR.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 2, буква и)
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 2, point (i)
и) „право на достъп“ означава неизключителни лицензии и права на потребителя върху предварителна информация и ПИС или произтичаща информация и ПИС, които не включват правото на преотстъпване, освен ако не е договорено другояче в проектното споразумение;
(i) "Access Right” shall mean non-exclusive licences and user rights to Foreground or Background, which rights shall not include the right to sublicense unless otherwise agreed upon in the Project Agreement;
и) „право на достъп“ означава неизключителни лицензии и права на потребителя върху предварителна информация и ПИС или произтичаща информация и ПИС, предоставени по силата на проектните споразумения, които не включват правото на преотстъпване, освен ако не е договорено другояче в проектното споразумение;
(i) "Access Right” shall mean non-exclusive licences and user rights to Foreground or Background to be granted under Project Agreements , which rights shall not include the right to sublicense unless otherwise agreed upon in the Project Agreement;
The addition clarifies that access rights will be granted under Project Agreements and e.g. not like in FP projects by the grant agreement (as well).
The addition clarifies that access rights will be granted under Project Agreements and e.g. not like in FP projects by the grant agreement (as well).
The grant agreement should refer to this IPR policy only and stipulate that project participants must make an IPR arrangement that is not in conflict with this policy.
The grant agreement should refer to this IPR policy only and stipulate that project participants must make an IPR arrangement that is not in conflict with this policy.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 2, буква й)
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 2, point (j)
й) “необходим” означава “технически необходим” за изпълнението на проекта и/или по отношение на използването на произтичаща информация и ПИС и, когато се касае за права върху интелектуална собственост, означава, че тези права върху интелектуална собственост ще бъдат нарушени, ако не бъдат предоставени права на достъп;
(j) “Needed” shall mean “technically essential” for the implementation of the Project and/or in respect of use of Foreground and, where Intellectual Property Rights are concerned, shall mean that those Intellectual Property Rights would be infringed if the Access Rights were not granted;
й) “необходим” означава “технически необходим” за изпълнението на проекта и/или по отношение на Използването на произтичаща информация и ПИС, а когато се касае за права върху интелектуална собственост, означава, че тези права върху интелектуална собственост ще бъдат нарушени, ако не бъдат предоставени права на достъп;
(j) “Needed” shall mean “technically essential” for the implementation of the Project and/or in respect of Use of Foreground and, where Intellectual Property Rights are concerned, shall mean that those Intellectual Property Rights would be infringed if the Access Rights were not granted;
Since 'Use' is a term defined in this contract it should be written with a capital 'U'.
Since 'Use' is a term defined in this contract it should be written with a capital 'U'.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 3, алинея 3.2.1
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3.2.1.
Участниците в един и същи проект сключват помежду си проектно споразумение, уреждащо, inter alia, правата на достъп, които следва да бъдат предоставени в съответствие с този член.
Project participants in the same Project shall conclude among themselves a Project Agreement that shall govern, inter alia, the Access Rights to be granted in accordance with this Article.
Участниците в проекта могат да определят нуждите от предварителна информация и ПИС за целите на проекта и, когато това е подходящо, могат да решат да изключат конкретна предварителна информация и ПИС.
Project participants may define the Background needed for the purposes of the Project and, where appropriate, may agree to exclude specific Background.
Участниците в проекта могат да решат да предоставят по-големи права на достъп, отколкото определените в настоящия член.
Project participants may decide to grant broader Access Rights than required by this Article .
Участниците в проекта могат да определят нуждите от предварителна информация и ПИС за целите на проекта , а когато това е подходящо, могат да решат да изключат конкретна предварителна информация и ПИС.
Project participants may define the Background needed for the purposes of the Project and, where appropriate, may agree to exclude specific Background.
The Access Rights to be granted under this Article should be granted at all times, but Project participants may decide to grant broader Access Rights.
The Access Rights to be granted under this Article should be granted at all times, but Project participants may decide to grant broader Access Rights.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 3, алинея 3.2.4
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3.2.4.
Участниците в един и същи проект се ползват с права на достъп до предварителната информация и ПИС, ако това е необходимо за ползването на тяхната собствена произтичаща информация и ПИС по този проект, при условие че собственикът на предварителната информация и ПИС има право да ги предоставя.
Participants in the same Project shall enjoy Access Rights to Background if this is needed for the Use of their own Foreground of that Project, provided that the owner of the Background is entitled to grant them.
Тези права на достъп се предоставят като неизключителни при справедливи, разумни и недискриминационни условия.
Such Access Rights shall be granted on a non-exclusive basis on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions.
Тези права на достъп се предоставят като неизключителни и непрехвърляеми при справедливи, разумни и недискриминационни условия.
Such Access Rights shall be granted on a non-exclusive , non-transferable basis on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions.
The addition is made to avoid that due to the difference with 3.2.3 this clause might be interpreted as granting “transferable” access rights.
The addition is made to avoid that due to the difference with 3.2.3 this clause might be interpreted as granting “transferable” access rights.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 3, алинея 3.3.1
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3.3.1.
Когато съществува възможност за доходно използване на произтичащата информация и ПИС, нейният притежател (i) трябва да се погрижи за нейната подходяща и ефективна закрила, като вземе надлежно под внимание както своите законни интереси, и по-специално търговските интереси, така и тези на другите заинтересовани участници в проекта, и (ii) трябва да я използва или да се погрижи за това тя да бъде използвана.
Where Foreground is capable of being profitably exploited, its owner (i) shall provide for its appropriate and effective protection, having due regard to its legitimate interests, particularly commercial interests, and those of the other participants in the Project concerned and (ii) shall use it or ensure that it is used.
Когато съществува възможност за доходно използване на произтичащата информация и ПИС, нейният притежател (i) трябва да се погрижи за нейната подходяща и ефективна закрила, като вземе надлежно под внимание както своите законни интереси, така и законните интереси на другите заинтересовани участници в проекта, и по-специално търговските интереси, и (ii) трябва да я използва или да се погрижи за това тя да бъде използвана.
Where Foreground is capable of being profitably exploited, its owner (i) shall provide for its appropriate and effective protection, having due regard to its legitimate interests and legitimate interests of other participants in the Project concerned , particularly commercial interests, and (ii) shall use it or ensure that it is used.
'Particularly commercial interest' should refer to both the Party providing Foreground as well as the other participants in the Project.
'Particularly commercial interest' should refer to both the Party providing Foreground as well as the other participants in the Project.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 3, алинея 3.4, точка 3.4.1
Annex, Article 24, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3.4, point 3.4.1
Когато участник прехвърля собственост върху произтичаща информация и ПИС, той прехвърля своите задължения по отношение на тази произтичаща информация и ПИС върху цесионера, включително задължението да прехвърли тези задължения върху всеки последващ цесионер .
Where a participant transfers ownership of Foreground, it shall pass on its obligations regarding such Foreground to the transferee including the obligation to pass those obligations on to any subsequent transferee.
Тези задължения включват задължения, свързани с преотстъпването на права на достъп и огласяването и използването .
These obligations shall include those relating to the granting of Access Rights , and dissemination and use.
Когато участник прехвърля собственост върху произтичаща информация и ПИС, той прехвърля своите задължения по отношение на тази произтичаща информация и ПИС върху цесионера, по-специално задължения, свързани с преотстъпването на права на достъп и тяхното огласяване и използване .
Where a participant transfers ownership of Foreground, it shall pass on its obligations regarding such Foreground to the transferee , in particular those relating to the granting of Access Rights and their dissemination and use .
При всяко подобно прехвърляне участникът уведомява останалите участници в проекта за името и данните за връзка на цесионера.
Upon any such transfer, the participant concerned shall notify the other participants in the same Project of the name and contact details of the transferee .
To make the process more industry friendly, the above text should be changed and clause (24.3.4.2) deleted.
To make the process more industry friendly, the above text should be changed and clause (24.3.4.2) deleted.
Приложение, член 24, параграф 3, алинея 3.4, точка 3.4.2
Annex, article 24, paragraph 3, subparagraph 3.4, point 3.4.2
При запазване на задълженията относно поверителността, когато участник в един проект трябва да прехвърли своите задължения да предостави права на достъп, той трябва да изпрати минимум 45 дни преди това уведомление до останалите участници за планирания трансфер, заедно с достатъчно информация относно бъдещия собственик на произтичаща информация и ПИС, за да позволи на останалите участници да упражнят правата си на достъп.
Subject to its obligations concerning confidentiality, where a Project participant is required to pass on its obligations to provide access rights, it shall give at least 45 days prior notice to the other participants of the envisaged transfer , together with sufficient information concerning the envisaged new owner of the Foreground to permit the other participants to exercise their access rights.
След нотифицирането, всеки друг участник има право да подаде възражение в срок от 30 дни или в рамките на друг отрязък от време, договорен в писмена форма, срещу всеки планиран трансфер на собственост, с аргумента че той ще се отрази неблагоприятно на правата му на достъп.
Following notification, any other participant may object within 30 days or within a different time-limit agreed in writing, to any envisaged transfer of ownership on the grounds that it would adversely affect its access rights.
Когато някой от останалите участници покаже, че ще бъдат неблагоприятно засегнати правата му на достъп, планираният трансфер не се извършва, докато не се постигне споразумение между заинтересованите участници.
Where any of the other participants demonstrate that their access rights would be adversely affected, the intended transfer shall not take place until agreement has been reached between participants concerned.
Requirements on transfer are unnecessarily burdensome.
Requirements on transfer are unnecessarily burdensome.
The interests of other participants are protected by the obligations on transfer in Article 24.3.4.1. to respect the rights of those other participants.
The interests of other participants are protected by the obligations on transfer in Article 24.3.4.1. to respect the rights of those other participants.
A number of ETPs have developed Strategic Research Agendas of such a scope and scale that require the substantial mobilisation of public and private resources to implement them.
A number of ETPs have developed Strategic Research Agendas of such a scope and scale that require the substantial mobilisation of public and private resources to implement them.
The ARTEMIS JTI aims to create a single, Europe wide R&D programme that will help EU industry to achieve world leadership in embedded computing technologies.
The ARTEMIS JTI aims to create a single, Europe wide R&D programme that will help EU industry to achieve world leadership in embedded computing technologies.
To this end it will combine national, EU and private resources within a legal framework, a Joint Undertaking under Article 171 of the Treaty.
To this end it will combine national, EU and private resources within a legal framework, a Joint Undertaking under Article 171 of the Treaty.
Why is ARTEMIS needed?
Why is ARTEMIS needed?
Europe is facing the challenges of the next generation of information technology systems, the "embedding of intelligence" which adds value to all kinds of products from cars and planes to mobile phones and pacemakers.
Europe is facing the challenges of the next generation of information technology systems, the "embedding of intelligence" which adds value to all kinds of products from cars and planes to mobile phones and pacemakers.
Embedded systems will add to the innovation potential and competitiveness of existing European industries and will help create new markets and applications from personal health systems to environmental monitoring.
Embedded systems will add to the innovation potential and competitiveness of existing European industries and will help create new markets and applications from personal health systems to environmental monitoring.
Embedded systems are the computers used in larger systems to control equipment and functions.
Embedded systems are the computers used in larger systems to control equipment and functions.
Already in 2000, 98% of computing devices sold worldwide were embedded in products.
Already in 2000, 98% of computing devices sold worldwide were embedded in products.
Forecasts predict more than 16 billion embedded devices by 2010 and over 40 billion by 2020.
Forecasts predict more than 16 billion embedded devices by 2010 and over 40 billion by 2020.
However, EU research investment in embedded systems is lagging well behind the US and Japan.
However, EU research investment in embedded systems is lagging well behind the US and Japan.
In Europe current R&D funding is fragmented in national, trans-national (eg.
In Europe current R&D funding is fragmented in national, trans-national (eg.
EUREKA) and Community programmes with no common objectives.
EUREKA) and Community programmes with no common objectives.
The increasing complexity and sophistication of embedded systems requires advanced skills that are scarce and results in huge technological R&D and innovation challenges that currently cannot be met.
The increasing complexity and sophistication of embedded systems requires advanced skills that are scarce and results in huge technological R&D and innovation challenges that currently cannot be met.
A number of negative impacts can be identified if no action is taken: Europe would be unable to reap the benefits from the new markets created by the “embedding of intelligence”, would become dependent on non-European technology (as it already happened with the desktop and internet ICT waves), and will be unable to nurture and retain the talent needed in relevant fields.
A number of negative impacts can be identified if no action is taken: Europe would be unable to reap the benefits from the new markets created by the “embedding of intelligence”, would become dependent on non-European technology (as it already happened with the desktop and internet ICT waves), and will be unable to nurture and retain the talent needed in relevant fields.
The Commission expects that ARTEMIS will achieve integration of national efforts by pursuing common objectives, leveraging effect of Community funding by Member States, reduced time to project and economic impacts through technology.
The Commission expects that ARTEMIS will achieve integration of national efforts by pursuing common objectives, leveraging effect of Community funding by Member States, reduced time to project and economic impacts through technology.
The rapporteur considers the introduction of JTIs, as proposed by the EC, positive for two main reasons:
The rapporteur considers the introduction of JTIs, as proposed by the EC, positive for two main reasons:
1. it allows an efficient and concrete collaboration between the public and the private sectors;
1. it allows an efficient and concrete collaboration between the public and the private sectors;
2. it promotes the maximisation of the use of Community financial resources.
2. it promotes the maximisation of the use of Community financial resources.
The rapporteur underlines also the fact that all proposed JTIs, and ARTEMIS in particular, are to be considered as concrete examples of the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy at European level, and for this reason they are of particular relevance for EU industry.
The rapporteur underlines also the fact that all proposed JTIs, and ARTEMIS in particular, are to be considered as concrete examples of the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy at European level, and for this reason they are of particular relevance for EU industry.
Taking into account this worries, nevertheless, the rapporteur considers the juridical structure proposed by the Commission (a Community body) as the best solution possible to implement a private-public partnership and notes the distinction between its purpose and the purpose of Community agencies.
Taking into account this worries, nevertheless, the rapporteur considers the juridical structure proposed by the Commission (a Community body) as the best solution possible to implement a private-public partnership and notes the distinction between its purpose and the purpose of Community agencies.
A practical solution to above concerns can be found with the introduction of a sunset clause for the proposed mechanisms, which will limit the lifetime of ARTEMIS and allow for early assessment and termination if necessary.
A practical solution to above concerns can be found with the introduction of a sunset clause for the proposed mechanisms, which will limit the lifetime of ARTEMIS and allow for early assessment and termination if necessary.
The European Parliament should take into account the positive position on the EC proposal of the industry sector.
The European Parliament should take into account the positive position on the EC proposal of the industry sector.
Concerning any worries about excessive running and bureaucratic costs in Community bodies, the ARTEMIS industry accepts to bear the majority of the JU's administrative costs: this private participation is the best guarantee of expenses control.
Concerning any worries about excessive running and bureaucratic costs in Community bodies, the ARTEMIS industry accepts to bear the majority of the JU's administrative costs: this private participation is the best guarantee of expenses control.
The rapporteur shares the concerns of the industry on the timing of the JTI adoption, for not losing precious time for the implementation of research activities.
The rapporteur shares the concerns of the industry on the timing of the JTI adoption, for not losing precious time for the implementation of research activities.
This would have serious effects on the EU competitiveness at a global level, particularly in the sector of embedded computing systems, where US and Japanese industries are very strong competitors.
This would have serious effects on the EU competitiveness at a global level, particularly in the sector of embedded computing systems, where US and Japanese industries are very strong competitors.
With regards to the sensitive issue of SMEs, the rapporteur would like to underline that, from one side, it is important to follow the EP approach which ensures SMEs participation within the 7FP research activities.
With regards to the sensitive issue of SMEs, the rapporteur would like to underline that, from one side, it is important to follow the EP approach which ensures SMEs participation within the 7FP research activities.
On the other side, the setting up of minimum thresholds for the participation of SMEs would be unnecessary and possibly counterproductive.
On the other side, the setting up of minimum thresholds for the participation of SMEs would be unnecessary and possibly counterproductive.
The level of SMEs participation in the ARTEMIS JU, in fact, is expected to be higher than the compromise target set for the 7FP (15%) because in this particular area of research the average SME participation in the 7FP comes close to 30%.
The level of SMEs participation in the ARTEMIS JU, in fact, is expected to be higher than the compromise target set for the 7FP (15%) because in this particular area of research the average SME participation in the 7FP comes close to 30%.
Given that the JTI will support more applied research than in the 7FP we can be optimistic that the participation of SMEs could even be greater.
Given that the JTI will support more applied research than in the 7FP we can be optimistic that the participation of SMEs could even be greater.
Of course, this approach is fully compatible with the drafting of punctual amendments on specific subjects, once a proper agreement between the EU institutions is reached on the general structure of ARTEMIS.
Of course, this approach is fully compatible with the drafting of punctual amendments on specific subjects, once a proper agreement between the EU institutions is reached on the general structure of ARTEMIS.