natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Възлага на своя председател да предаде настоящата резолюция на Съвета и Комисията, както и на правителствата на държавите-членки и Комитета на регионите.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Governments of the Member States and the Committee of the Regions.
European Union regional policy should address two fundamental issues, namely Community cohesion and the need for action to foster innovation.
European Union regional policy should address two fundamental issues, namely Community cohesion and the need for action to foster innovation.
During the 2007-2013 financial perspective period, European Regional Development Fund, Cohesion Fund and European Social Fund resources will be used in pursuit of three fundamental goals, namely, convergence, competitiveness and European territorial cooperation.
During the 2007-2013 financial perspective period, European Regional Development Fund, Cohesion Fund and European Social Fund resources will be used in pursuit of three fundamental goals, namely, convergence, competitiveness and European territorial cooperation.
Through these funds, Community regional policy should be directed towards not just ironing out disparities among individual EU regions but also enhancing the Community's capacity to take innovative action in all areas.
Through these funds, Community regional policy should be directed towards not just ironing out disparities among individual EU regions but also enhancing the Community's capacity to take innovative action in all areas.
We should therefore not waste the time, money or creative abilities of our citizens.
We should therefore not waste the time, money or creative abilities of our citizens.
What we need is an appropriate environment and an understanding that innovation is not just for scientists, researchers, inventors, industrialist, businessmen and politicians.
What we need is an appropriate environment and an understanding that innovation is not just for scientists, researchers, inventors, industrialist, businessmen and politicians.
It is essential for individuals in local and regional communities to feel that innovation is for everyone and can improve their living conditions and quality of life.
It is essential for individuals in local and regional communities to feel that innovation is for everyone and can improve their living conditions and quality of life.
This will be difficult to achieve, but did anyone ever say that we would only have easy issues to deal with?
This will be difficult to achieve, but did anyone ever say that we would only have easy issues to deal with?
It should therefore be firmly emphasised that pro-innovation action is an obligation for the EU as a whole, for individual Member States and for all the regions.
It should therefore be firmly emphasised that pro-innovation action is an obligation for the EU as a whole, for individual Member States and for all the regions.
It should be noted, however, that the overall annual amount currently available at EU level stands at no more than 1% of Community GDP.
It should be noted, however, that the overall annual amount currently available at EU level stands at no more than 1% of Community GDP.
Unless an appropriate commitment (which must, of course, include funding) is forthcoming from the Member States, innovation will be no more than a nice-sounding slogan (which, incidentally, sounds much the same in all our languages, since it comes from the Latin innovatio ) .
Unless an appropriate commitment (which must, of course, include funding) is forthcoming from the Member States, innovation will be no more than a nice-sounding slogan (which, incidentally, sounds much the same in all our languages, since it comes from the Latin innovatio ) .
It is high time for us to turn declarations and commitments into practical action, because innovation is not an end unto itself.
It is high time for us to turn declarations and commitments into practical action, because innovation is not an end unto itself.
Innovation should, in principle, inform all activities contributing to genuine Community cohesion in the fields of science, education and research, construction and technology, law and organisation, management and administration, the economy and trade, energy and the environment.
Innovation should, in principle, inform all activities contributing to genuine Community cohesion in the fields of science, education and research, construction and technology, law and organisation, management and administration, the economy and trade, energy and the environment.
Innovative solutions are also needed for social and health-care problems as well as issues relating to access to culture.
Innovative solutions are also needed for social and health-care problems as well as issues relating to access to culture.
And each of the above aspects has a regional dimension.
And each of the above aspects has a regional dimension.
The basis for all action taken at Community, Member State and regional level should be the general wellbeing of the population.
The basis for all action taken at Community, Member State and regional level should be the general wellbeing of the population.
Investing in people, creating an appropriate environment for their development, including by ensuring access to education, so as to be able to put to good use their intellectual potential and capacity for creative action, should therefore be a central tenet of Community action.
Investing in people, creating an appropriate environment for their development, including by ensuring access to education, so as to be able to put to good use their intellectual potential and capacity for creative action, should therefore be a central tenet of Community action.
We must, furthermore, tap the reservoir of positive experience that has existed for generations in the countries of Europe.
We must, furthermore, tap the reservoir of positive experience that has existed for generations in the countries of Europe.
This is the fundamental source of Europe's - of our - competitive success at world level.
This is the fundamental source of Europe's - of our - competitive success at world level.
What is also needed is for large numbers of Europeans to adopt a far-reaching, innovative mindset and to take practical innovative action.
What is also needed is for large numbers of Europeans to adopt a far-reaching, innovative mindset and to take practical innovative action.
This is particularly important in view of the fact that the demographic situation in Europe is becoming alarming.
This is particularly important in view of the fact that the demographic situation in Europe is becoming alarming.
Having identified the challenges facing it, the Union set itself the goal, under the Lisbon Strategy, of becoming the world's most competitive economy.
Having identified the challenges facing it, the Union set itself the goal, under the Lisbon Strategy, of becoming the world's most competitive economy.
This is to be achieved, among other things, by increasing research and development (R&D) spending to 3% of GDP.
This is to be achieved, among other things, by increasing research and development (R&D) spending to 3% of GDP.
However, only two Member States - Sweden and Finland - have as yet reached that level.
However, only two Member States - Sweden and Finland - have as yet reached that level.
Furthermore, there are major differences between regions in terms of R&D spending levels.
Furthermore, there are major differences between regions in terms of R&D spending levels.
According to the statistics available, 21 of the 254 EU-25 regions have hit the target.
According to the statistics available, 21 of the 254 EU-25 regions have hit the target.
So for the new cohesion policy objectives to be met, the regional and local levels need to be more actively involved in efforts to achieve the Lisbon Strategy goals.
So for the new cohesion policy objectives to be met, the regional and local levels need to be more actively involved in efforts to achieve the Lisbon Strategy goals.
Pro-innovation policy, whether at EU, Member State or regional level, must be viewed in the light of what is a changing environment; i.e. proper account must be taken of the fact that others are developing at the same time as we are.
Pro-innovation policy, whether at EU, Member State or regional level, must be viewed in the light of what is a changing environment; i.e. proper account must be taken of the fact that others are developing at the same time as we are.
So if we want to be better, we must be more competitive in terms of new technologies and methods, new construction materials, new products and services, new energy sources and new organisational, legal, financial and other arrangements.
So if we want to be better, we must be more competitive in terms of new technologies and methods, new construction materials, new products and services, new energy sources and new organisational, legal, financial and other arrangements.
In short, in terms of new, attractive assets.
In short, in terms of new, attractive assets.
The European Union is one of the world's two leading economies.
The European Union is one of the world's two leading economies.
The GDP of the EU as a whole is extremely close to that of the United States (USD 12.5 trillion, according to World Bank figures).
The GDP of the EU as a whole is extremely close to that of the United States (USD 12.5 trillion, according to World Bank figures).
However, the EU is currently losing the race with its main rivals in terms of investment in a knowledge-based economy.
However, the EU is currently losing the race with its main rivals in terms of investment in a knowledge-based economy.
We need to take a good look at the approach that China and India are taking to this issue.
We need to take a good look at the approach that China and India are taking to this issue.
According to the figures available, EU research spending stands at 1.96% of GDP, as against 2.59% for the United States and 12% for Japan.
According to the figures available, EU research spending stands at 1.96% of GDP, as against 2.59% for the United States and 12% for Japan.
If we really are to meet the Lisbon Strategy goals (as updated in July 2005), we need to adopt a comprehensive approach to this issue, including in the new regional policy.
If we really are to meet the Lisbon Strategy goals (as updated in July 2005), we need to adopt a comprehensive approach to this issue, including in the new regional policy.
This view is echoed in the Commission communication of 13 September 2005 entitled 'Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU'.
This view is echoed in the Commission communication of 13 September 2005 entitled 'Putting knowledge into practice: A broad-based innovation strategy for the EU'.
The communication sets out 10 actions that are of particularly high priority for the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs.
The communication sets out 10 actions that are of particularly high priority for the Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs.
It is worth quoting the following excerpt: 'The main competence to foster innovation often lies at regional level.
It is worth quoting the following excerpt: 'The main competence to foster innovation often lies at regional level.
Regions should therefore be involved in the preparation and implementation of the National Reform Programmes, including by developing their own regional innovation strategies.
Regions should therefore be involved in the preparation and implementation of the National Reform Programmes, including by developing their own regional innovation strategies.
Additional efforts need to be undertaken to facilitate policy learning and the diffusion of good practice across borders'.
Additional efforts need to be undertaken to facilitate policy learning and the diffusion of good practice across borders'.
The road map for a more innovative Europe must therefore also cover the regions.
The road map for a more innovative Europe must therefore also cover the regions.
And, wherever possible, business angels' activities should help to enhance the pro-innovation impact of policy conducted at local and regional level.
And, wherever possible, business angels' activities should help to enhance the pro-innovation impact of policy conducted at local and regional level.
In this report, every attempt has been made to take account of the broadest possible range of mutual links between Community regional policy and the Community's innovation potential.
In this report, every attempt has been made to take account of the broadest possible range of mutual links between Community regional policy and the Community's innovation potential.
A large number of source materials and opinions of Commission and Committee of the Regions representatives has therefore been taken into account.
A large number of source materials and opinions of Commission and Committee of the Regions representatives has therefore been taken into account.
It should be noted that a fairly wide range of views have been expressed on the matter.
It should be noted that a fairly wide range of views have been expressed on the matter.
One example is the nine-point 'Innovation Manifesto' focusing on relations between industry and academia that was published by the Science Business independent news service in November 2006.
One example is the nine-point 'Innovation Manifesto' focusing on relations between industry and academia that was published by the Science Business independent news service in November 2006.
Finally, the rapporteur should like to thank all those who provided support and assistance in the drafting of this report.25.1.2007
Finally, the rapporteur should like to thank all those who provided support and assistance in the drafting of this report.25.1.2007
on the contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
on the contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
Emphasises that the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund play a major role in the pursuit of the Lisbon objectives, particularly in the field of innovation;
Emphasises that the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund play a major role in the pursuit of the Lisbon objectives, particularly in the field of innovation;
Considers the Structural Fund to be a vital tool for supporting innovation capacity, and in particular for achieving cohesion and reducing economic disparities between regions; proposes that the amount allocated from the Structural Funds to research and innovation be increased considerably;
Considers the Structural Fund to be a vital tool for supporting innovation capacity, and in particular for achieving cohesion and reducing economic disparities between regions; proposes that the amount allocated from the Structural Funds to research and innovation be increased considerably;
Expresses concern at the fact that although the European Union authorities recognise the crucial importance of promoting innovation, the appropriations allocated to research and development are insufficient to meet the real needs of the Union and thereby ensure its competitiveness;
Expresses concern at the fact that although the European Union authorities recognise the crucial importance of promoting innovation, the appropriations allocated to research and development are insufficient to meet the real needs of the Union and thereby ensure its competitiveness;
Recognises that innovation is essential for creating employment in Europe;
Recognises that innovation is essential for creating employment in Europe;
Stresses the need for an extensive system of public-private partnerships to supplement the public financing made available by the Member States and the Union; notes that the success of those activities will depend essentially on interlinking the potential players;
Stresses the need for an extensive system of public-private partnerships to supplement the public financing made available by the Member States and the Union; notes that the success of those activities will depend essentially on interlinking the potential players;
Emphasises the importance of improving SME access to financing from the Structural Funds in order to increase the cost effectiveness of EU expenditure for the public; takes the view, in this regard, that greater diversification of financing should be promoted and that particular efforts should be made to develop more fully the potential of risk capital;
Emphasises the importance of improving SME access to financing from the Structural Funds in order to increase the cost effectiveness of EU expenditure for the public; takes the view, in this regard, that greater diversification of financing should be promoted and that particular efforts should be made to develop more fully the potential of risk capital;
Recognises the need to create regional innovation poles and areas and to link these via networks to corresponding structures in other regions and Member States or third countries.
Recognises the need to create regional innovation poles and areas and to link these via networks to corresponding structures in other regions and Member States or third countries.
The contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
The contribution of the future regional policy to the innovative capacity of the European Union
BUDG 18.5.2006
BUDG 18.5.2006
Nathalie Griesbeck 20.9.2004
Nathalie Griesbeck 20.9.2004
Paul Rübig and Hans-Peter Martin.
Paul Rübig and Hans-Peter Martin.
Mieczysław Edmund Janowski 2.5.2006
Mieczysław Edmund Janowski 2.5.2006
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Tiberiu Bărbuleţiu, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Vasile Dîncu, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Sérgio Marques, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Yiannakis Matsis, Miroslav Mikolášik, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Stefan Sofianski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Alfonso Andria, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Tiberiu Bărbuleţiu, Jean Marie Beaupuy, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Vasile Dîncu, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Gisela Kallenbach, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Sérgio Marques, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Yiannakis Matsis, Miroslav Mikolášik, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Wojciech Roszkowski, Elisabeth Schroedter, Stefan Sofianski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Oldřich Vlasák, Vladimír Železný
Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Ljudmila Novak, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Zita Pleštinská, Christa Prets, Toomas Savi, László Surján, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Nikolaos Vakalis
Jan Březina, Brigitte Douay, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Dariusz Maciej Grabowski, Ljudmila Novak, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Zita Pleštinská, Christa Prets, Toomas Savi, László Surján, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Nikolaos Vakalis
относно освобождаването от отговорност във връзка с изпълнението на бюджета на Европейския център за развитие на професионалното обучение за 2005 финансова година
on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005
PE 384.432v02-00
PE 384.432v02-00
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ.............................5
PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION............................................5
ПРЕДЛОЖЕНИЕ ЗА РЕЗОЛЮЦИЯ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ......................7
MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION...........................................7
СТАНОВИЩЕ НА КОМИСИЯТА ПО ЗАЕТОСТ И СОЦИАЛНИ ВЪПРОСИ.................13
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............12
– като взе предвид окончателния годишен отчет на Европейския център за развитие на професионалното обучение за 2005 финансова година
– having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005
– като взе предвид доклада на Сметната палата за окончателния годишен отчет на Европейския център за развитие на професионалното обучение за 2005 финансова година
– having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005, together with the Centre's replies
– като взе предвид препоръката на Съвета от 27 февруари 2007 г. (5711/2007 - C6‑0080/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 - C6-0080/2007 ),
– като взе предвид Договора за ЕО и по-специално член 276 от него,
– having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,
– като взе предвид Регламент на Съвета (EО, Eвратoм) № 1605/2002 от 25 юни 2002 г. относно финансовия регламент, приложим за общия бюджет на Европейските общности
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
– като взе предвид Регламент (ЕИО) № 337/75 на Съвета от 10 февруари 1975 година за създаване на Европейски център за развитие на професионално обучение
– having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
ОВ L 39, 13.2.1975 г., стр.1.
OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p.1.
– като взе предвид Регламент (EО, Евратом) № 2343/2002 на Комисията от 19 ноември 2002 г. относно рамковия Финансов регламент за органите, посочени в член 185 от Регламент (ЕО, Евратом) № 1605/2002 на Съвета относно Финансовия регламент, приложим за общия бюджет на Европейските общности
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002
– като взе предвид член 71 и приложение V от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по бюджетен контрол и становището на комисията по заетост и социални въпроси ( A6‑0097/2007 ),
– having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0097/2007 ),
3. възлага на своя председател да предаде настоящото решение, както и резолюцията, която е неразделна част от него, на директора на Европейския център за развитие на професионалното обучение, на Съвета, Комисията и Сметната палата , и да осигури публикуването им в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз (серия L).
Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
относно приключването на сметките във връзка с изпълнението на бюджета на Европейския център за развитие на професионалното обучение за 2005 финансова година
on closing the accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005
Отчет за приходите и разходите за финансовите 2004 г. и 2005 г. (в хиляди евро)
Revenue and expenditure account for the financial years 2004 and 2005 (in EUR 1000)
Субсидии от Комисията
Commission subsidies
16 418
16 418
13 700
13 700
Целеви приходи
Assigned revenue
Други приходи
Miscellaneous revenue
Приходи общо a)
Total revenue (a)
17 027
17 027
14 466
14 466
Бюджетни разходи за финансовата година
Budgetary expenditure for the financial year
Персонал - Дял I от бюджета
Staff - Title 1 of the budget
8 862
8 862
8 579
8 579
Пренесени бюджетни кредити
Appropriations carried over
Администрация - Дял II от бюджета
Administration - Title II of the budget