natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(34) Сътрудничеството между държавите-членки, Комисията и с трети държави е от съществено значение за ефикасното разследване на ННН риболов, както и за прилагането на мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент; за активизирането на това сътрудничество следва да се създаде система за взаимопомощ;
(34) Cooperation between Member States, the Commission, and with third states is essential to ensure that IUU fishing is properly investigated and that the measures laid down in the present Regulation can be applied; a system for mutual assistance shall be established to enhance such cooperation.
(34) Сътрудничеството , координацията и обменът на добри практики между държавите-членки, Комисията и с трети държави са от съществено значение за ефикасното разследване на ННН риболов, както и за прилагането на мерките, предвидени в настоящия регламент; за активизирането на това сътрудничество следва да се създаде система за взаимопомощ;
(34) Cooperation , coordination and the exchange of good practices between Member States, the Commission, and with third states is essential to ensure that IUU fishing is properly investigated and that the measures laid down in the present Regulation can be applied; a system for mutual assistance shall be established to enhance such cooperation.
Coordination and the exchange of good practices are also necessary.
Coordination and the exchange of good practices are also necessary.
(37) Настоящият регламент определя ННН риболов като особено тежко нарушение на приложимите законодателство , правила и регламенти, тъй като сериозно затруднява постигането на целите на нарушените правила, и застрашава устойчивостта на засегнатите запаси и опазването на морската околна среда.
(37) This regulation identifies IUU fishing as violations of applicable laws, rules or regulations of particular gravity, as they seriously undermine the attainment of the objectives of the violated rules and put the sustainability of the stocks concerned or the conservation of the marine environment in jeopardy.
Предвид ограничения обхват на регламента, прилагането му следва да разчита и да бъде допълващо към прилагането на Регламент 2847/93 на Съвета относно установяването на система за контрол, приложима към общата политика в областта на рибарството.
Given its restricted scope, the implementation of this Regulation must relay on, and be complementary to, that of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, which establishes the basic framework for the control and monitoring of fishing activities under the Common Fisheries Policy.
Съответно настоящият регламент затвърждава разпоредбите на Регламент 2847/93 относно пристанищните инспекции на кораби на трети страни (членове 28д, 28е и 28ж), които се отменят и заменят с режима на пристанищни инспекции съгласно Глава II от настоящия регламент.
Accordingly, this Regulation reinforces the rules of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 in the area of port inspections of third country vessels (Article 28e, 28f and 28g), which are now abrogated and replaced by the port inspection regime established in Chapter II of this Regulation.
Следователно разпоредбите на Регламент 2847/93 за санкциите (член 31) остават приложими за други нарушения на правилата на ОПОР, различни от уредените в настоящия регламент.
The provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 relating to sanctions (Article 31) remain thus applicable to violations of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy other than those addressed by this Regulation.
(37) Настоящият регламент определя ННН риболов като особено тежко нарушение на приложимите закони , правила или регламенти, тъй като сериозно затруднява постигането на целите на нарушените правила, и застрашава оцеляването на рибните стопанства, които извършват законна дейност, устойчивостта на сектора, на засегнатите запаси и опазването на морската околна среда.
(37) This regulation identifies IUU fishing as violations of applicable laws, rules or regulations of particular gravity, as they seriously undermine the attainment of the objectives of the violated rules and put the survival of fisheries operating legally, the sustainability of the sector and of the stocks concerned and the conservation of the marine environment in jeopardy.
It is necessary to specify the nature of the existing threat.
It is necessary to specify the nature of the existing threat.
За тази цел всяка държава-членка взема целесъобразни мерки в съответствие с правото на Общността и както многостранните, така и двустранните международни задължения , за да гарантира ефикасността на системата.
To this end, each Member State shall take appropriate measures, in accordance with Community law and both multilateral and bilateral international obligations , to ensure the effectiveness of the system.
In order not to be in violation of multilateral or bilateral obligations these obligations should be mentioned in Article 1 as well
In order not to be in violation of multilateral or bilateral obligations these obligations should be mentioned in Article 1 as well
Graham Booth, Daniel Caspary, Christofer Fjellner, Glyn Ford, Béla Glattfelder, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jacky Hénin, Syed Kamall, Alain Lipietz, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Georgios Papastamkos, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Gianluca Susta, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Iuliu Winkler, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Graham Booth, Daniel Caspary, Christofer Fjellner, Glyn Ford, Béla Glattfelder, Ignasi Guardans Cambó, Jacky Hénin, Syed Kamall, Alain Lipietz, Marusya Ivanova Lyubcheva, Erika Mann, Helmuth Markov, David Martin, Georgios Papastamkos, Tokia Saïfi, Peter Šťastný, Gianluca Susta, Daniel Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, Iuliu Winkler, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Jean-Pierre Audy, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Ole Christensen, Rovana Plumb
Jean-Pierre Audy, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Ole Christensen, Rovana Plumb
Система на Общността за борба с нелегалния, безотчетен и нерегламентиран риболов
Community system against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing
Jim Allister, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Hélène Goudin, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Philippe Morillon, Seán Ó Neachtain, Luca Romagnoli, Struan Stevenson, Catherine Stihler, Cornelis Visser
Jim Allister, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Marie-Hélène Aubert, Iles Braghetto, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Zdzisław Kazimierz Chmielewski, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Ioannis Gklavakis, Hélène Goudin, Heinz Kindermann, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Philippe Morillon, Seán Ó Neachtain, Luca Romagnoli, Struan Stevenson, Catherine Stihler, Cornelis Visser
Willem Schuth, Kathy Sinnott, Kyösti Virrankoski
Willem Schuth, Kathy Sinnott, Kyösti Virrankoski
PE 402.838v02-00
PE 402.838v02-00
– като взе предвид препоръката на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0839 ),
– having regard to the Commission recommendation to the Council ( COM(2007)0839 ),
– като взе предвид член 3, параграф 4 от Акта за присъединяване на България и Румъния, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0028/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0028/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по икономически и парични въпроси ( A6‑0194/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6‑0194/2008 ),
Препоръка за решение
Recommendation for a decision
Арбитражната конвенция, както е изменена с Протокола от 25 май 1999 г., Конвенциите от 21 декември 1995 г. и 8 декември 2004 г. и настоящото решение, влиза в сила на 1 януари 2007 г. между България, Румъния и останалите държави-членки, в които Арбитражната конвенция е влязла в сила.
The Arbitration Convention, as amended by the Protocol of 25 May 1999, the Conventions of 21 December 1995 and of 8 December 2004 and this Decision, enters into force on 1 January 2007 between Bulgaria, Romania and the other Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is in force.
Тя влиза в сила между България, Румъния и всяка една от другите държави-членки в деня, в който Арбитражната конвенция влезе в сила за другата съответна държава-членка.
It enters into force between Bulgaria, Romania and each of the other Member States on the day the Arbitration Convention enters into force for the other Member State concerned.
Арбитражната конвенция, както е изменена с Протокола от 25 май 1999 г., Конвенциите от 21 декември 1995 г. и 8 декември 2004 г. и настоящото решение, влиза в сила в деня след публикуването на настоящото решение в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз между България, Румъния и държавите-членки , в които Арбитражната конвенция е влязла в сила.
The Arbitration Convention, as amended by the Protocol of 25 May 1999, the Conventions of 21 December 1995 and of 8 December 2004 and this Decision, enters into force on the day following that of the publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union between Bulgaria, Romania and the other Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is in force.
Тя влиза в сила между България, Румъния и всяка една от останалите държави-членки в деня, в който Арбитражната конвенция влезе в сила за другата съответна държава-членка.
It enters into force between Bulgaria, Romania and each of the other Member States on the day the Arbitration Convention enters into force for the other Member State concerned.
Concerns have been expressed about a retroactive entry into force.
Concerns have been expressed about a retroactive entry into force.
In order to remove any doubts under national law, it is suggested that the date of entry into force of the Arbitration Convention is set on the day following that of the publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
In order to remove any doubts under national law, it is suggested that the date of entry into force of the Arbitration Convention is set on the day following that of the publication of this Decision in the Official Journal of the European Union.
The Commission Recommendation for a Council decision concerns the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention 90/436/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises (the so-called "Arbitration Convention"), as amended by the Convention of 21st December 1995 on the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the Arbitration Convention, the Protocol of 25 May 1999 amending the Arbitration Convention and the Convention signed on 8 December 2004 by the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia on their accession to the Arbitration Convention.
The Commission Recommendation for a Council decision concerns the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention 90/436/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises (the so-called "Arbitration Convention"), as amended by the Convention of 21st December 1995 on the accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden to the Arbitration Convention, the Protocol of 25 May 1999 amending the Arbitration Convention and the Convention signed on 8 December 2004 by the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia on their accession to the Arbitration Convention.
These set of legal instruments aim at the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises.
These set of legal instruments aim at the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises.
The Arbitration Convention sets out an arbitration procedure that allows companies to ask for a review of the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises.
The Arbitration Convention sets out an arbitration procedure that allows companies to ask for a review of the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises.
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania has introduced a simplified system for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to these conventions. .On the basis of Article 3(3) and 3(4) of the Act of Accession, the Council must adopt a decision in order to determine the date on which these conventions shall enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania and to make all the necessary adjustments to these conventions.
The 2005 Act of accession of Bulgaria and Romania has introduced a simplified system for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to these conventions. .On the basis of Article 3(3) and 3(4) of the Act of Accession, the Council must adopt a decision in order to determine the date on which these conventions shall enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania and to make all the necessary adjustments to these conventions.
In doing so, the Council must act on a recommendation of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament.
In doing so, the Council must act on a recommendation of the Commission, after consulting the European Parliament.
In so far as the proposed decision is the implementation of a mandate included in the 2005 Accession Treaty, the rapporteur fully supports the Commission's recommendation and looks forward to seeing the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Arbitration Convention and the related instruments completed in the shortest time period.
In so far as the proposed decision is the implementation of a mandate included in the 2005 Accession Treaty, the rapporteur fully supports the Commission's recommendation and looks forward to seeing the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Arbitration Convention and the related instruments completed in the shortest time period.
However, the rapporteur wishes to draw the legislator's attention to the issue regarding the date of entry into force of the amended Arbitration Convention.
However, the rapporteur wishes to draw the legislator's attention to the issue regarding the date of entry into force of the amended Arbitration Convention.
The proposed text suggests that the amended Arbitration Convention enters into force between Bulgaria, Romania and the Member States, according to the following schedule:
The proposed text suggests that the amended Arbitration Convention enters into force between Bulgaria, Romania and the Member States, according to the following schedule:
· as regards the Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is already in force: on 1 January 2007 ;
· as regards the Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is already in force: on 1 January 2007 ;
· as regards the Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is not yet in force: on the day the Arbitration Convention enters into force for those Member States.
· as regards the Member States for which the Arbitration Convention is not yet in force: on the day the Arbitration Convention enters into force for those Member States.
This schedule implies that the Decision, when and if approved, will set a retroactive date of entry into force of the Arbitration Convention .
This schedule implies that the Decision, when and if approved, will set a retroactive date of entry into force of the Arbitration Convention .
Concerns have been expressed about such retroactive effect.
Concerns have been expressed about such retroactive effect.
As regards the date of application , i.e. the date from which the applicability of the procedures under the Arbitration Convention starts to run, the rapporteur , in line with the principles which the Arbitration Convention incorporates, calls on the Council, when deciding on that date, to take into account that such arrangement avoids tax burden for taxpayers.
As regards the date of application , i.e. the date from which the applicability of the procedures under the Arbitration Convention starts to run, the rapporteur , in line with the principles which the Arbitration Convention incorporates, calls on the Council, when deciding on that date, to take into account that such arrangement avoids tax burden for taxpayers.
Изменение на приложение I към Акта за присъединяване на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 23 юли 1990 г. за премахване на двойното данъчно облагане във връзка с корекцията на печалби на свързани предприятия
Amendment ot Annex I of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 23 July 1990 on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises
Мариела Величкова Баева, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, David Casa, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Andrea Losco, Astrid Lulling, Florencio Luque Aguilar, Hans-Peter Martin, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Dariusz Rosati, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ieke van den Burg, Cornelis Visser, Sahra Wagenknecht
Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Zsolt László Becsey, Pervenche Berès, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, David Casa, Jonathan Evans, Elisa Ferreira, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Donata Gottardi, Benoît Hamon, Gunnar Hökmark, Karsten Friedrich Hoppenstedt, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Christoph Konrad, Kurt Joachim Lauk, Andrea Losco, Astrid Lulling, Florencio Luque Aguilar, Hans-Peter Martin, John Purvis, Bernhard Rapkay, Dariusz Rosati, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Peter Skinner, Margarita Starkevičiūtė, Ieke van den Burg, Cornelis Visser, Sahra Wagenknecht
PE 398.606v03-00
PE 398.606v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по правни въпроси .............................................60
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ........................................................4
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по транспорт и туризъм ...................................99
OPINION of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ..................................4
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2007)0303 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0303 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 95 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6-0159/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0159/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите и становищата на комисията по транспорт и туризъм и на комисията по правни въпроси ( A6-0195/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6‑0195/2008 ),
Съображение -1 a (ново)
Recital -1 a (new)
(-1а) Тъй като туризмът играе все по-голяма роля в икономиките на държавите-членки, секторите, които предлагат временно ползване на собственост и дългосрочни ваканционни продукти, трябва да бъдат стимулирани за постигане на по-висок растеж и производителност чрез приемане на набор от минимални общи правила;
(-1a) Since tourism plays an increasingly important role in the economies of the Member States, the timeshare and long-term holiday industries have to be stimulated to achieve greater growth and productivity by adopting a minimum set of common rules;
(1) След приемането на Директива 94/47/EО на Европейският парламент и на Съвета от 26 октомври 1994 г. относно защитата на купувачите с оглед на определени аспекти, свързани с придобиване на правото на временно ползване на недвижима собственост, временното ползване на недвижима собственост се е развило и на пазара са се появили нови ваканционни продукти, подобни на него.
(1) Since the adoption of Directive 94/47/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 October 1994 on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis, timeshare has evolved and new holiday products similar to it have appeared on the market.
Тези нови ваканционни продукти и някои сделки, свързани с временното ползване на собственост, като препродажба и замяна, не са обхванати от Директива 94/47/EО.
These new holiday products and certain transactions related to timeshare, such as resale and exchange, are not covered by Directive 94/47/EC.
Освен това, опитът при прилагането на Директива 94/47/EО е показал, че някои точки, които вече са обхванати, имат нужда от осъвременяване или изясняване.
In addition, experience with the application of Directive 94/47/EC has shown that some points already covered need to be updated or clarified.
Тези нови ваканционни продукти и някои сделки, свързани с временното ползване на собственост, като договори за препродажба и замяна, не са обхванати от Директива 94/47/EО.
These new holiday products and certain transactions related to timeshare, such as resale and exchange contracts , are not covered by Directive 94/47/EC.
Освен това, опитът при прилагането на Директива 94/47/EО е показал, че някои точки, които вече са обхванати, имат нужда от осъвременяване или изясняване , с оглед предотвратяване разработването на продукти, които целят заобикаляне на тази директива .
In addition, experience with the application of Directive 94/47/EC has shown that some points already covered need to be updated or clarified , with a view to p reventing the development of products which aim to circumvent this Directive.
Brings the recital into line with Articles 1 and 2.
Brings the recital into line with Articles 1 and 2.
(3) За да се засили правната сигурност и да се постигнат изцяло ползите от вътрешния пазар за потребителите и бизнеса, съответните закони на държавите-членки трябва допълнително да се уеднаквят .
(3) In order to enhance legal certainty and fully achieve the benefits of the internal market for consumers and businesses, the relevant laws of the Member States need to be approximated further.
Въпреки това за някои аспекти държавите-членки трябва да могат да прилагат по-стриктни правила.
However, for certain aspects Member States should be able to continue to apply stricter rules.
(3) За да се засили правната сигурност и да се постигнат изцяло ползите от вътрешния пазар за потребителите и бизнеса, редица елементи на маркетинга, продажбата и препродажбата на временно ползване на собственост и на дългосрочни ваканционни продукти, както и замяната на временно ползване на собственост следва да бъдат напълно хармонизирани .
(3) In order to enhance legal certainty and fully achieve the benefits of the internal market for consumers and businesses, certain aspects of the marketing, sale and resale of timeshare and long-term holiday products as well as exchange of timeshare should be fully harmonised.
На държавите-членки не следва да се разрешава да запазват или да въвеждат национално законодателство в областите, уредени от настоящата директива.
Member States should not be allowed to maintain or introduce nat ional legislation in the fields covered by this Directive.
Когато разглеждат въпроси, които не са уредени от разпоредбите на настоящата директива, държавите-членки следва да продължат да имат свободата да запазват или въвеждат национално законодателство в съответствие с правото на Общността.
When dealing with issues not covered by the provisions in this Directive, Member States should remain free to maintain or introduce national legislation in conformity with Community law .