natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ако срокът на задължението за изпълнение на отлагащи мерки или алтернативни санкции е изтекъл , компетентният орган на изпълняващата държава прекратява разпоредените мерки веднага щом бъде надлежно нотифициран от компетентния орган на решаващата държава .
If the obligation to execute suspensory measures or alternative sanctions has lapsed , the competent authority of the executing State shall end the measures ordered as soon as it has been duly notified by the competent authority of the issuing State .
След като бъде уведомен от компетентния орган на решаващата държава съгласно параграф 5 по-горе, компетентният орган на изпълняващата държава прекратява надзора и изпълнението на отложени мерки.
When it is notified of the fact by the competent authority of the issuing State pursuant to paragraph 5 above , the competent authority of the executing State shall end the supervision and execution of suspensory measures.
Амнистия и помилване
Amnesty and pardon
Амнистия, помилване и преразглеждане на присъдата
Amnesty , pardon and judgment review
Член 16, параграф 1а (нов)
Article 16, paragraph 1 a (new)
Само решаващата държава може да вземе решение относно молби за преразглеждане на присъди, включващи присъди с отложено изпълнение, условни присъди и алтернативни санкции, чийто надзор и изпълнение се уреждат с настоящото рамково решение.
Only the issuing State can take a decision regarding requests for a review of judgments involving suspended sentences, conditional sentences and alternative sanctions, the supervision and execution of which are covered by this Framework Decision.
Ако осъденото лице напусне изпълняващата държава и законно се установи за пребиваване в друга държава-членка , компетентният съдебен орган на изпълняващата държава прехвърля юрисдикцията за надзор над отлагащите мерки и алтернативните санкции и за всички по-нататъшни решения, свързани с изпълнението на съдебното решение, на компетентния съдебен орган на решаващата държава.
If the sentenced person leaves the executing State and establishes his or her lawful and ordinary residence in another Member State , the competent judicial authority of the executing State shall transfer jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of the suspensory measures and alternative sanctions and in respect of all further decisions relating to the execution of the judgment to the competent judicial authority of the issuing State.
Ако осъденото лице напусне изпълняващата държава или престане да има законно и обичайно местопребиваване в изпълняващата държава, компетентният съдебен орган на изпълняващата държава прехвърля юрисдикцията за надзор над отлагащите мерки и задълженията или предписанията, съставляващи алтернативни санкции и за всички по-нататъшни решения, свързани с изпълнението на съдебното решение (или, по целесъобразност, на решението за условно освобождаване) на компетентния съдебен орган на решаващата държава.
If the sentenced person leaves the executing State or ceases to have a lawful and ordinary residence in the executing State , the competent judicial authority of the executing State shall transfer jurisdiction in respect of the supervision of the suspensory measures and the obligations or instructions which constitute alternative sanctions and in respect of all further decisions relating to the execution of the judgment (or if appropriate the decision for conditional release) to the competent judicial authority of the issuing State.
The executing State is no longer able to exercise supervision over the sentenced person, hence responsibility for supervision passes to the issuing State.
The executing State is no longer able to exercise supervision over the sentenced person, hence responsibility for supervision passes to the issuing State.
Such a transfer of responsibility should be regarded as an 'obligation' and not as a 'power'.
Such a transfer of responsibility should be regarded as an 'obligation' and not as a 'power'.
Член 17, параграф 1а (нов)
Article 17, paragraph 1 a (new)
Прехвърлянето на юрисдикция, посочено в параграф 1, трябва да се извърши и ако решаващата държава отправи искане в този смисъл до компетентния съдебен орган на изпълняващата държава с основанието, че в решаващата държава е предприето по-нататъшно наказателно производство срещу лицето.
The transfer of jurisdiction referred to in paragraph 1 must also take place if the issuing State issues a request to that effect to the competent judicial authority of the executing State on the grounds that further criminal proceedings against the person are taking place in the issuing State.
It is now quite some time since the European Union ceased to be merely a common economic area and began to adopt shared values as well.
It is now quite some time since the European Union ceased to be merely a common economic area and began to adopt shared values as well.
It is progressing towards its aim of establishing a political community pursuing the illuminist ideal of the sublime dignity of man and it is gradually instituting political power-sharing amongst its Member States, cooperation amongst institutions and a legal system which is both cosmopolitan and people-centred.
It is progressing towards its aim of establishing a political community pursuing the illuminist ideal of the sublime dignity of man and it is gradually instituting political power-sharing amongst its Member States, cooperation amongst institutions and a legal system which is both cosmopolitan and people-centred.
What is genuinely fascinating about the European Union is this journey towards the individual and towards a legal system applicable to all peoples and all generations.
What is genuinely fascinating about the European Union is this journey towards the individual and towards a legal system applicable to all peoples and all generations.
Within the area of freedom, security and justice, the free movement of persons is matched by the movement of judicial decisions through mutual recognition and also through police and judicial cooperation.
Within the area of freedom, security and justice, the free movement of persons is matched by the movement of judicial decisions through mutual recognition and also through police and judicial cooperation.
The various fields of law (including criminal law) are increasingly being released from 'feudalisation' within the individual Member States in order to secure the common ideal of justice for all.
The various fields of law (including criminal law) are increasingly being released from 'feudalisation' within the individual Member States in order to secure the common ideal of justice for all.
The European Union is an extraordinary example of a political organisation which has learned to converge the particular interests of each Member State with the moral aims of an embryonic legal system.
The European Union is an extraordinary example of a political organisation which has learned to converge the particular interests of each Member State with the moral aims of an embryonic legal system.
Criminal law is included in this gradual move towards mutual cooperation amongst the EU Member States.
Criminal law is included in this gradual move towards mutual cooperation amongst the EU Member States.
The purpose of the Framework Decision under consideration here is to facilitate a sentenced person's reintegration into society, to provide better protection for victims and society as a whole and to facilitate the enforcement of appropriate suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences in the case of offenders who are not resident in the State in which they were sentenced.
The purpose of the Framework Decision under consideration here is to facilitate a sentenced person's reintegration into society, to provide better protection for victims and society as a whole and to facilitate the enforcement of appropriate suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences in the case of offenders who are not resident in the State in which they were sentenced.
The value of this initiative is above all that it encourages the Member States' judicial authorities to incorporate sanctions other than custodial sentences into their criminal law.
The value of this initiative is above all that it encourages the Member States' judicial authorities to incorporate sanctions other than custodial sentences into their criminal law.
We are all aware that if the political agenda does not offer conditions for the establishment of alternative sanctions, judges tend not to apply them.
We are all aware that if the political agenda does not offer conditions for the establishment of alternative sanctions, judges tend not to apply them.
Facilitating alternative sanctions serves to promote humanitarian attitudes to criminal law and to sentences and hence promotes European law in general.
Facilitating alternative sanctions serves to promote humanitarian attitudes to criminal law and to sentences and hence promotes European law in general.
It resolves the fallacy of setting a sentenced person's right to social reintegration against society's interest in reintegrating him.
It resolves the fallacy of setting a sentenced person's right to social reintegration against society's interest in reintegrating him.
The truth of the matter is that there is no opposition here.
The truth of the matter is that there is no opposition here.
The status of sentenced persons is even a barometer enabling the degree of civilisation and the calibre of the justice system of any political community to be assessed.
The status of sentenced persons is even a barometer enabling the degree of civilisation and the calibre of the justice system of any political community to be assessed.
Promoting the application of suspensory measures as an alternative to a custodial sentence is an objective to be achieved as a matter of urgency in the field of EU criminal law.
Promoting the application of suspensory measures as an alternative to a custodial sentence is an objective to be achieved as a matter of urgency in the field of EU criminal law.
European politics must strive to establish a link between criminal law and a culture of rights in all its dimensions: as regards the devising and execution of sentences and the relationship between sentenced persons and society in general.
European politics must strive to establish a link between criminal law and a culture of rights in all its dimensions: as regards the devising and execution of sentences and the relationship between sentenced persons and society in general.
At times the effectiveness of mutual recognition is restricted by the fact that the Member States' criminal laws are still in the early stages of harmonisation.
At times the effectiveness of mutual recognition is restricted by the fact that the Member States' criminal laws are still in the early stages of harmonisation.
An example of this is provided by the Framework Decision under consideration.
An example of this is provided by the Framework Decision under consideration.
The procedure for cooperation in the supervision and execution of alternative sanctions would be much simpler and more efficient (and also much less problematic) if the Member States adopted the same types of sentence or had similar judicial structures or even substantive and procedural criminal laws with a greater degree of equivalence [see the problem of adapting the 'different measures' or of the 'instability of jurisdictions' when a suspended sentence is revoked or a sentence is imposed in the case of a conditional sentence].
The procedure for cooperation in the supervision and execution of alternative sanctions would be much simpler and more efficient (and also much less problematic) if the Member States adopted the same types of sentence or had similar judicial structures or even substantive and procedural criminal laws with a greater degree of equivalence [see the problem of adapting the 'different measures' or of the 'instability of jurisdictions' when a suspended sentence is revoked or a sentence is imposed in the case of a conditional sentence].
The need for the Member States' substantive criminal laws to be progressively harmonised is a background condition for the completion of the European area of freedom, security and justice.
The need for the Member States' substantive criminal laws to be progressively harmonised is a background condition for the completion of the European area of freedom, security and justice.
Furthermore, increasing harmonisation of the Member States' criminal laws can be advocated on the basis of the common values referred to in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union: after all, those values are to a large extent underpinned by laws which punish criminal behaviour.
Furthermore, increasing harmonisation of the Member States' criminal laws can be advocated on the basis of the common values referred to in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union: after all, those values are to a large extent underpinned by laws which punish criminal behaviour.
In the meantime the procedural rules laid down in the Framework Decision will have to be organised on the basis of the current state of affairs.
In the meantime the procedural rules laid down in the Framework Decision will have to be organised on the basis of the current state of affairs.
Hence it has been decided that for reasons of legality, clarity and legal certainty, the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State will be governed by the rule that the State which exercises a given power or responsibility will apply its own laws thereto ( see Article 12(2) ).
Hence it has been decided that for reasons of legality, clarity and legal certainty, the distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State will be governed by the rule that the State which exercises a given power or responsibility will apply its own laws thereto ( see Article 12(2) ).
Along with this arrangement a decision has been taken to stipulate the principle of the hearing of defendants as a principle which must be applied in cases involving the revocation of a suspended sentence or the imposition of a conditional sentence [ see Article 14(2)a (new) ].
Along with this arrangement a decision has been taken to stipulate the principle of the hearing of defendants as a principle which must be applied in cases involving the revocation of a suspended sentence or the imposition of a conditional sentence [ see Article 14(2)a (new) ].
Similarly, the reference to the Member States' constitutions in conjunction with a reference to the Treaty values ( see Article 3 ) has been deemed useful.
Similarly, the reference to the Member States' constitutions in conjunction with a reference to the Treaty values ( see Article 3 ) has been deemed useful.
Fundamental rights set a standard on the basis of which the inventories of EU and Member-State fundamental rights are to be read as open ones which complement each other.
Fundamental rights set a standard on the basis of which the inventories of EU and Member-State fundamental rights are to be read as open ones which complement each other.
In this connection a contribution to the question of consent in initiating the transfer of responsibility for supervision and execution has also been sought ( see Article 5(1)a ).
In this connection a contribution to the question of consent in initiating the transfer of responsibility for supervision and execution has also been sought ( see Article 5(1)a ).
The transfer option is not a sentenced person's fundamental right [precisely because that person already has 'sentenced' status and the clarification of timing and role is also a question of judicial legitimacy].
The transfer option is not a sentenced person's fundamental right [precisely because that person already has 'sentenced' status and the clarification of timing and role is also a question of judicial legitimacy].
Hence the transfer is not subject to consent.
Hence the transfer is not subject to consent.
What should exist here is decisive judicial consideration geared to the purposes of the Framework Decision and the granting to the sentenced person of the right to be heard, since a hearing has an essential role to play in such consideration.
What should exist here is decisive judicial consideration geared to the purposes of the Framework Decision and the granting to the sentenced person of the right to be heard, since a hearing has an essential role to play in such consideration.
It is, furthermore, in the interests of such effectiveness that it is being proposed here that a 'rule on the exceptional nature of refusal' by the executing State be enshrined ( see Article 12(3) ).
It is, furthermore, in the interests of such effectiveness that it is being proposed here that a 'rule on the exceptional nature of refusal' by the executing State be enshrined ( see Article 12(3) ).
A decision has also been taken to include a definition of 'lawful and ordinary residence' which corresponds to the definition found in European Court of Justice case-law [ see Article 2(ga) (new) ].
A decision has also been taken to include a definition of 'lawful and ordinary residence' which corresponds to the definition found in European Court of Justice case-law [ see Article 2(ga) (new) ].
As has already been said, the opinion provides comprehensive clarification of the definition/distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State.
As has already been said, the opinion provides comprehensive clarification of the definition/distribution of powers and responsibilities between the issuing State and the executing State.
Clarity underpins the legal certainty and the legality which are essential to criminal law.
Clarity underpins the legal certainty and the legality which are essential to criminal law.
For this reason the adaptation of measures by the executing State as regards the nature thereof ( see Article 7(2 ) has been rejected.
For this reason the adaptation of measures by the executing State as regards the nature thereof ( see Article 7(2 ) has been rejected.
Only adaptation as regards duration and possibly the form of execution is compatible with the typification required by the principle of strict legality in criminal law.
Only adaptation as regards duration and possibly the form of execution is compatible with the typification required by the principle of strict legality in criminal law.
Lastly, it should be pointed out that the Franco-German initiative relating to this Framework Decision sends out a very positive signal within the European area of freedom, security and justice.
Lastly, it should be pointed out that the Franco-German initiative relating to this Framework Decision sends out a very positive signal within the European area of freedom, security and justice.
It shows that the European dimension is now understood in the light of the idea of intensive EU political and legal integration.
It shows that the European dimension is now understood in the light of the idea of intensive EU political and legal integration.
It also shows how the humanisation of criminal law infuses the European legal system: a legal system based on the irreducible value of humanity, in which each individual - even a sentenced one - is regarded as an end in himself, as a unique and unrepeatable being.
It also shows how the humanisation of criminal law infuses the European legal system: a legal system based on the irreducible value of humanity, in which each individual - even a sentenced one - is regarded as an end in himself, as a unique and unrepeatable being.
Признаване и наблюдение на изпълнението на условни присъди с изпитателен срок, заместващи санкции и условни присъди
Recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
Alexander Alvaro, Philip Bradbourn, Michael Cashman, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Henrik Lax, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Sarah Ludford, Viktória Mohácsi, Martine Roure, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Ioannis Varvitsiotis
Alexander Alvaro, Philip Bradbourn, Michael Cashman, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Kinga Gál, Roland Gewalt, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Barbara Kudrycka, Henrik Lax, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Sarah Ludford, Viktória Mohácsi, Martine Roure, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Vladimir Urutchev, Adina-Ioana Vălean, Ioannis Varvitsiotis
PE 392.121v04-00
PE 392.121v04-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията ( COM(2007)0306 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0306 )
– като взе предвид член 30, параграф 1, букви а) и б), член 31, параграф 1, букви а) и б) и член 34, параграф 2, буква в) от Договора за ЕС,
– having regard to Article 30(1)(a) and (b), Article 31(1)(a) and (b) and Article 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 39, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕС, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6-0215/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0215/2007 ),
– като взе предвид член 93 и член 51 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 93 and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи и становището на комисията по бюджети ( A6-0357/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0357/2007 ),
Член 1, параграф 5
Article 1, paragraph 5
Разходите за инсталиране, функциониране и управление на комуникационната инфраструктура се поемат от общия бюджет на Европейския съюз.
The costs of installing, operating and managing the Communication Infrastructure shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union
Разходите за инсталиране, функциониране и управление на комуникационната инфраструктура се поемат от общия бюджет на Европейския съюз.
The costs of installing, operating and managing the Communication Infrastructure shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union.
Всяка държава-членка е отговорна за поемането на разходите по националната база данни и по свързването й с комуникационната инфраструктура ШИС или S-Testa.
Each Member State shall be responsible for bearing the costs incurred by the national database and of its connection to the SIS or S-Testa communication infrastructure.
As SIS remains a system simply connecting national data bases, it should be financed by the Member States,provided that it stays at national level.
As SIS remains a system simply connecting national data bases, it should be financed by the Member States,provided that it stays at national level.
Съветът съгласува изпитванията на държавите-членки и одобрява резултатите, като информира непрекъснато Комисията.
The Council shall coordinate Member States' test activities and validate the test results and keep the Commission informed.
Съветът съгласува изпитванията на държавите-членки и одобрява резултатите, като информира непрекъснато Комисията и Европейския парламент .
The Council shall coordinate Member States' test activities and validate the test results, keeping the Commission and the European Parliament informed.
Договорът по параграф 1 е в съответствие с разпоредбите на членове от 88 до 107 от Регламент (ЕО, Евратом) № 1605/2002.
The contract referred to in paragraph 1 shall comply with the provisions of Articles 88 to 107 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002.
The rules of the Financial Regulation have to be respected at all times.
The rules of the Financial Regulation have to be respected at all times.
Разходите, направени от органите, посочени в параграф 1 с цел изпълнение на задачите от този параграф, се поемат от общия бюджет на Европейския съюз.
The cost incurred by the bodies referred to in paragraph 1 for the execution of the tasks referred to in paragraph 1 shall be borne by the general budget of the European Union.