natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(b) the implementing measures to be adopted are of a general scope and seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic act, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing them by the addition of new non-essential elements.
(b) the implementing measures to be adopted are of a general scope and seek to amend non-essential elements of a basic act, inter alia by deleting some of those elements or by supplementing them by the addition of new non-essential elements.
A need to examine to what extent decisions on amendments to international legal act should be taken by way of the (simple) regulatory committee procedure and not with scrutiny (by way of the relevant Regulation 2099/2002 concerning the procedure for checking the conformity of international legal instruments with Community legislation)
A need to examine to what extent decisions on amendments to international legal act should be taken by way of the (simple) regulatory committee procedure and not with scrutiny (by way of the relevant Regulation 2099/2002 concerning the procedure for checking the conformity of international legal instruments with Community legislation)
- because adaptation to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny does not extend to all the provisions for revision of the directive, which gives rise to an issue that merits investigation, at least as far as Article 27, paragraph 4 is concerned.
- because adaptation to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny does not extend to all the provisions for revision of the directive, which gives rise to an issue that merits investigation, at least as far as Article 27, paragraph 4 is concerned.
As regards this point, it is proposed that decisions on amendments to international legal instruments are taken by the (simple) regulatory committee procedure.
As regards this point, it is proposed that decisions on amendments to international legal instruments are taken by the (simple) regulatory committee procedure.
It should be noted, that the Commission has stated that this Regulation must be subject to adaptation to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny in one of the forthcoming 'omnibus' proposals.
It should be noted, that the Commission has stated that this Regulation must be subject to adaptation to the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny in one of the forthcoming 'omnibus' proposals.
A number of ‘technical’ amendments are proposed to take into account the points contained in the note of the Consultative Working Party and in the letter/opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs .
A number of ‘technical’ amendments are proposed to take into account the points contained in the note of the Consultative Working Party and in the letter/opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs .
Chairman of the Committee on Transport
Chairman of the Committee on Transport
and Tourism
and Tourism
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament ad of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (COM(2007)610 final - C6-0348/07 - 200/0219(COD) (recast)
Subject : Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament ad of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers (COM(2007)610 final - C6-0348/07 - 200/0219(COD) (recast)
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 80a on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure by its Decision of 10 May 2007.
The Committee on Legal Affairs, which I am honoured to chair, has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 80a on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure by its Decision of 10 May 2007.
However, pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the codification rules and that they did not involve any substantive change to the proposal.
However, pursuant to Rules 80a(2) and 80(3), the Committee on Legal Affairs considered that the technical adaptations suggested in the opinion of the abovementioned Working Party were necessary in order to ensure that the proposal complied with the codification rules and that they did not involve any substantive change to the proposal.
In conclusion, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 18 votes in favour
In conclusion, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 18 votes in favour
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacques Toubon, Costas Botopoulos. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacques Toubon, Costas Botopoulos. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.
Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party.
ANNEX 2: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY
ANNEX 2: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the minimum level of training of seafarers
COM(2007) 610 final of 16.10.2007 - 2007/0219 (COD)
COM(2007) 610 final of 16.10.2007 - 2007/0219 (COD)
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 26 October 2007 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal, submitted by the Commission.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 26 October 2007 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal, submitted by the Commission.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 official language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English text, being the master-copy language version of the document under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the minimum level of training of seafarers resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal 22 official language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English text, being the master-copy language version of the document under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Directive 2001/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the minimum level of training of seafarers resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) The text of the first sentence of Recital 10 of Directive 2005/45/EC should be introduced, in adapted form, into the preamble to the recast proposal.
1) The text of the first sentence of Recital 10 of Directive 2005/45/EC should be introduced, in adapted form, into the preamble to the recast proposal.
The new recital, to be numbered 10, should read as follows: " Member States should take and enforce specific measures to prevent and penalise fraudulent practices associated with certificates of competency as well as pursue their efforts within the IMO to achieve strict and enforceable agreements on the worldwide combating of such practices ".
The new recital, to be numbered 10, should read as follows: " Member States should take and enforce specific measures to prevent and penalise fraudulent practices associated with certificates of competency as well as pursue their efforts within the IMO to achieve strict and enforceable agreements on the worldwide combating of such practices ".
As a consequence of the inserting of this new recital, recitals having been numbered 10 to 15 in the recast proposal should be re-numbered 11 to 16.
As a consequence of the inserting of this new recital, recitals having been numbered 10 to 15 in the recast proposal should be re-numbered 11 to 16.
2) The text of Recital 12 of Directive 2005/45/EC should also be introduced, in adapted form, into the preamble to the recast proposal.
2) The text of Recital 12 of Directive 2005/45/EC should also be introduced, in adapted form, into the preamble to the recast proposal.
The new recital, to be numbered 17, should read " The European Maritime Safety Agency should assist the Commission in verifying that Member States comply with the requirements laid down in this Directive ".
The new recital, to be numbered 17, should read " The European Maritime Safety Agency should assist the Commission in verifying that Member States comply with the requirements laid down in this Directive ".
Following recitals numbered 16 to 22 in the recast proposal should be re-numbered 18 to 24.
Following recitals numbered 16 to 22 in the recast proposal should be re-numbered 18 to 24.
3) Recital 23 should be removed from the text of the preamble to the recast act.
3) Recital 23 should be removed from the text of the preamble to the recast act.
The two following recitals, numbered 24 and 25 in the recast proposal, should be respectively re-numbered 25 and 26.
The two following recitals, numbered 24 and 25 in the recast proposal, should be respectively re-numbered 25 and 26.
4) In Article 5(6), the reference made to " paragraph 3 " should read as a reference to " paragraph 32 ".
4) In Article 5(6), the reference made to " paragraph 3 " should read as a reference to " paragraph 32 ".
5) In the English language version of the proposal, in Article 16(1) the correction made to the existing wording of Article 15(1), in which the words " a specified seafarer to serve in a specified ship for " were added, should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes.
5) In the English language version of the proposal, in Article 16(1) the correction made to the existing wording of Article 15(1), in which the words " a specified seafarer to serve in a specified ship for " were added, should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes.
Moreover, the presence of that correction should also have been mentioned in the explanatory memorandum.
Moreover, the presence of that correction should also have been mentioned in the explanatory memorandum.
6) The wording of Article 27(2) should be removed from the text of the recast act.
6) The wording of Article 27(2) should be removed from the text of the recast act.
Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 27 should be respectively re-numbered 2 and 3.
Paragraphs 3 and 4 of Article 27 should be respectively re-numbered 2 and 3.
7) It was acknowledged that in Annex I, Chapter VII, Regulation VII/1, the wording of point 1(5) contains a correct reference to Article 11, whereas the original text of Directive 2001/25/EC contained a mistake in that reference was being made in that point to Article 11 instead of Article 10.
7) It was acknowledged that in Annex I, Chapter VII, Regulation VII/1, the wording of point 1(5) contains a correct reference to Article 11, whereas the original text of Directive 2001/25/EC contained a mistake in that reference was being made in that point to Article 11 instead of Article 10.
8) In Annex III, Part A, the indication " only Article 4 " should be introduced in correspondence with the quotation of Directive 2005/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
8) In Annex III, Part A, the indication " only Article 4 " should be introduced in correspondence with the quotation of Directive 2005/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing text, without any change in its substance.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing text, without any change in its substance.
Минимална степен на обучение на морските лица (Кодифицирана версия)
Minimum level of training of seafarers (recast version)
Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Arūnas Degutis, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Brigitte Fouré, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Arūnas Degutis, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Francesco Ferrari, Brigitte Fouré, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Luís Queiró, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Lars Wohlin, Roberts Zīle
Zsolt László Becsey, Johannes Blokland, Jelko Kacin, Ari Vatanen, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Zsolt László Becsey, Johannes Blokland, Jelko Kacin, Ari Vatanen, Corien Wortmann-Kool
относно общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемане на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за установяване на обща разрешителна процедура за добавките в храните, ензимите в храните и ароматизантите в храните
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings
PE 404.468v02-00
PE 404.468v02-00
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (16673/2/2007 – C6‑0138/2008 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (16673/2/2007 – C6‑0138/2008 ),
Приети текстове, P6_TA(2007)0320 . относно предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2006)0423 )
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0320 on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0423 ),
– като взе предвид измененото предложение на Комисията ( COM(2007)0672 ),
– having regard to the amended proposal ( COM(2007)0672 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните ( A6‑0179/2008 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0179/2008 ),
2) В стремежа към изпълнение на политиките на Общността следва да се осигури висока степен на защита на човешкия живот и здраве.
(2) A high level of protection of human life and health should be assured in the pursuit of Community policies.
2) В стремежа към изпълнение на политиките на Общността следва да се осигури висока степен на защита на човешкия живот и здраве , както и на околната среда .
(2) A high level of protection of human life and health , and of the environment, should be assured in the pursuit of Community policies.
Reinstatement of amendment 1 EP first reading.
Reinstatement of amendment 1 EP first reading.
5а) Прозрачността при производството и обработването на храни е от абсолютно ключово значение за изграждане на доверие у потребителите.
(5a) Transparency in the production and handling of food is absolutely crucial to achieving consumer credibility.
Reinstatement of amendment 3 EP first reading.
Reinstatement of amendment 3 EP first reading.
11) В съответствие с рамката за оценка на риска по въпросите, свързани с безопасността на храните, установена с Регламент (ЕО) № 178/2002, разрешението за пускане на вещества на пазара трябва да бъде предшествано от извършване на научна оценка на риска, който те носят за човешкото здраве, при спазване на най-високите възможни стандарти.
(11) In accordance with the framework for risk assessment in matters of food safety established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, the authorisation to place substances on the market must be preceded by a scientific assessment, of the highest possible standard, of the risks that they pose to human health.
Тази оценка, която трябва да бъде направена под отговорността на Европейския орган за безопасност на храните, трябва да бъде последвана от решение за управление на риска, което Комисията взема, като прилага процедура по регулиране, гарантираща тясно сътрудничество между Комисията и държавите-членки.
This assessment, which must be carried out under the responsibility of the Authority, must be followed by a risk management decision taken by the Commission under a regulatory procedure that ensures close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States.
11) В съответствие с рамката за оценка на риска по въпросите, свързани с безопасността на храните, установена с Регламент (ЕО) № 178/2002, разрешението за пускане на вещества на пазара трябва да бъде предшествано от извършване на независима научна оценка на риска, който те носят за човешкото здраве, при спазване на най-високите възможни стандарти.
(11) In accordance with the framework for risk assessment in matters of food safety established by Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, the authorisation to place substances on the market must be preceded by an independent scientific assessment, of the highest possible standard, of the risk they pose to human health.
Тази оценка, която трябва да бъде направена под отговорността на Европейския орган за безопасност на храните, трябва да бъде последвана от решение за управление на риска, което Комисията взема, като прилага процедура по регулиране, гарантираща тясно сътрудничество между Комисията и държавите-членки.
This assessment, which must be carried out under the responsibility of the Authority, must be followed buy a risk management decision taken by the Commission under a regulatory procedure that ensures close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States.
Reinstatement of amendment 5 EP first reading.
Reinstatement of amendment 5 EP first reading.
11a) Критериите за разрешение, определени в съответствие с Регламенти (ЕО) № ХХХ/2006, (ЕО) № YYY/2006 и (ЕО) № ZZZ/2006, също следва да бъдат изпълнени, за да се издаде разрешение съгласно настоящия регламент.
(11a) The criteria laid down for authorisation under Regulations (EC) No XXX/2006, (EC) No YYY/2006 and (EC) No ZZZ/2006 should also be fulfilled for authorisation pursuant to this Regulation.
Член 1 - параграф 1
Article 1 – paragraph 1
Настоящият регламент установява обща процедура за оценка и издаване на разрешителни (наричана по-нататък „общата процедура“), за добавките в храните, ензимите в храните и ароматизантите в храните, както и за материалите, представляващи източници на ароматизанти в храните, и за хранителни съставки с ароматизиращи свойства, използвани или предназначени за влагане в или върху храни (наричани по-нататък „веществата“), която да улеснява свободното движение на тези вещества в рамките на Общността.
This Regulation lays down a common assessment and authorisation procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "common procedure") for food additives, food enzymes, food flavourings and source materials of food flavourings and of food ingredients with flavouring properties used or intended for use in or on foodstuffs (hereinafter referred to as the "substances"), which facilitates the free movement of these substances within the Community.
Настоящият регламент не се прилага за пушилните ароматизанти, които попадат в обхвата на Регламент (ЕО) № 2065/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 10 ноември 2003 г. относно пушилни ароматизанти, използвани или предназначени за влагане в или върху храни .
This Regulation shall not apply to smoke flavourings falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 November 2003 on smoke flavourings used or intended for use in or on foods.
Настоящият регламент установява обща процедура за издаване на разрешителни (наричана по-нататък „общата процедура“), за добавките в храните, ензимите в храните и ароматизантите в храните, както и за материалите, представляващи източници на ароматизанти в храните, и за хранителни съставки с ароматизиращи свойства, използвани или предназначени за влагане в или върху храни (наричани по-нататък „веществата“), която процедура допринася за по-добрата защита на потребителите и опазване на общественото здраве и за свободното движение на тези вещества и храни в рамките на Общността.
This Regulation lays down a common authorisation procedure (hereinafter referred to as the "common procedure") for food additives, food enzymes, food flavourings and source materials of food flavourings and food ingredients with flavouring properties used or intended to be used in or on foodstuffs (hereinafter referred to as the "substances"), which contributes to improved consumer protection and public health and the free movement of these substances within the Community.
Настоящият регламент не се прилага за пушилните ароматизанти, които попадат в обхвата на Регламент (ЕО) № 2065/2003 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 10 ноември 2003 г. относно пушилни ароматизанти, използвани или предназначени за влагане в или върху храни .
This Regulation shall not apply to smoke flavourings falling within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 2065/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 November 2003 on smoke flavourings use or intended for use in or on foods.
Reinstatement of amendment 11 EP first reading.
Reinstatement of amendment 11 EP first reading.
В рамките на отделните секторни законодателни актове в областта на храните, веществата, за които има разрешение да бъдат пускани на пазара на Общността, се включват в списък, чието съдържание се определя от съответния законодателен акт (наричан по-нататък „общностния списък“).
Under each sectoral food law, substances that have been authorised to be placed on the Community market shall be included on a list the content of which is determined by the said law (hereinafter referred to as the "Community list").
Общностният списък се актуализира от Комисията.
The Community list shall be updated by the Commission.