natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an institution.
To seek to gag Members of Parliament from expressing their opinions on matters of legitimate public interest and concern by bringing legal proceedings is unacceptable in a democratic society and manifestly in breach of Article 9 of the Protocol, which is intended to protect Members' freedom of expression in the performance of their duties in the interests of Parliament as an institution.
Furthermore, the fact that the civil proceedings in question were brought after criminal proceedings were unsuccessfully initiated at the instance of the claimant in respect of the same facts suggests that there is a fumus persecutionis .
Furthermore, the fact that the civil proceedings in question were brought after criminal proceedings were unsuccessfully initiated at the instance of the claimant in respect of the same facts suggests that there is a fumus persecutionis .
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Giuseppe Gargani be defended.
On the basis of the above considerations, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against defending immunity, recommends that the immunity of Mr Giuseppe Gargani be defended.
Искане за запазване на имунитета и привилегиите на Giuseppe Gargani
Request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Giuseppe Gargani
Giuseppe Gargani 30.11.2006 г. 11.12.2006 г.
Giuseppe Gargani 30.11.2006 11.12.2006
JURI 13.12.2006 г.
JURI 13.12.2006
Diana Wallis 18.12.2006 г.
Diana Wallis 18.12.2006
12 0 0
12 0 0
Cristian Dumitrescu, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Cristian Dumitrescu, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hans-Peter Mayer, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Заместник(ци), присъствал(и) на окончателното гласуване
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
Sharon Bowles, Mogens N.J. Camre, Kurt Lechner
Sharon Bowles, Mogens N.J. Camre, Kurt Lechner
Забележки (данни, на разположение само на един език)
Comments (available in one language only)
PE 384.212v02-00
PE 384.212v02-00
EXPOSÉ DES MOTIFS..............................................................................................................7
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................7
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0798 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0798 )
– като взе предвид член 37, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът е провел консултация с него ( C6‑0003/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 37(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0003/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по земеделие и развитие на селските райони ( A6‑0072/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6‑0072/2007 ),
Член 1, параграф 3 а (нов)
Article 1, paragraph 3 a (new)
От стопанската 2009/10 година няма да бъдат предоставяни никакви допълнителни тарифни квоти извън рамките на Регламент (ЕО) № 2501 на Съвета от 10 декември 2001 г. относно прилагането на схема за общи тарифни преференции за период от 1 януари 2002 г. до 31 декември 2004 г. (регламент „Всичко освен оръжия”) и привилегирования пазарен достъп на държавите от АКТБ.
From the marketing year 2009/10, no tariff quotas shall be allocated other than in relation to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 1 (the 'Everything But Arms' Regulation) and preferential market access for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States.
La présente dérogation doit être clairement limitée dans le temps de manière à satisfaire aux objectifs de réduction des quantités fixés par la réforme de l'organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur du sucre.
This derogation should be explicitly restricted to a definite period of time in order to achieve the reduction of sugar quantities in line with the reform of the common market organisation in sugar.
L'objectif principal de la réforme de l'organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur du sucre de l'Union européenne adoptée en juillet 2006 (règlement (CE) n° 318/2006) vise à réduire les quantités de sucre produites au sein de l'Union, à adapter la production à la consommation communautaire de sucre, et ce afin de parvenir à un meilleur équilibre du marché du sucre.
The main aims of the reform of the European common market organisation in sugar (Regulation 318/2006/EC), adopted in July 2006, were to reduce the mounting quantities of sugar in the EU, to adapt the market to domestic sugar consumption and, in so doing, to improve market balance for sugar.
Aussi, la quantité de sucre produite au sein de l'Union doit être réduite suffisamment pour que, s'inspirant des importations privilégiées en provenance des pays ACP, d'Inde et des pays des Balkans occidentaux dans le cadre de l'initiative "Tout sauf les armes" qui entrera pleinement en vigueur à partir de 2009, les importations de sucre soient exemptées de droits de douane, sans pour autant dépasser la consommation.
It is intended that the quantity of sugar produced in the EU should be reduced to the extent that sugar can be imported duty-free under the Everything But Arms initiative, which will be fully in force in 2009, alongside the existing preferential imports from ACP countries and India and from the Western Balkan countries, without the import quantities exceeding consumption.
Jusqu'à présent, cet objectif n'a été atteint qu'en partie.
As yet, this objective has been only partially achieved.
Le fonds de restructuration prévu dans le cadre du règlement instituant un régime de restructuration qui doit inciter l'industrie sucrière à renoncer aux quotas grâce au versement de primes dispose encore des deux tiers de ses ressources.
Only a third of the restructuring fund provided for by the restructuring scheme, whereby premium payments are issued as an incentive for the sugar industry to reduce quotas, has been used.
Désormais, la Commission doit envisager de prendre d'autres mesures administratives pour satisfaire aux règles fixées par la réforme du marché du sucre.
The Commission must now consider further administrative measures to meet the requirements of the sugar market reforms.
Dans ces circonstances, les dérogations susceptibles de favoriser l'augmentation de la quantité de sucre produite au sein de l'Union, telle que l'importation de sucre de canne de pays tiers dans des conditions avantageuses, doivent être strictement réglementées.
Under these circumstances, any derogations liable to increase the quantity of sugar produced in the EU, such as the import of raw cane sugar under favourable conditions, should be tightly regulated.
La Commission estime que l'industrie sucrière, en Bulgarie et en Roumanie, conformément aux besoins d'approvisionnement traditionnels, doit être autorisée pendant deux ans à importer du sucre à un droit avantageux de 98 euros par tonne afin d'éviter que ces deux pays, à la suite de leur adhésion à l'Union, n'aient à subir des préjudices, et de permettre également au secteur du sucre de ces deux pays de se stabiliser au sein du marché intérieur.
In the Commission's view, based on traditional supply needs the respective sugar industries in Bulgaria and Romania should be granted a two-year period in which they may import sugar at a preferential duty of EUR 98 a tonne in order to offset any unfairness towards the new Member States following their accession and to allow the sugar sector in both countries to stabilise its position on the internal market.
Le niveau du droit d'importation revu à la baisse correspond au niveau fixé pour le sucre concessions CXL dans le cadre des négociations d'adhésion menées par la Finlande.
The reduced duty corresponds to the level fixed for CXL concessions sugar during Finland's accession negotiations.
Par ailleurs, il était prévu d'appliquer temporairement le contingent CXL de manière à parvenir à une organisation commune des marchés dans le secteur du sucre qui soit cohérente.
The CXL quota should also apply for a restricted period of time, in order to ensure consistency in the common organisation of markets.
Pour les raisons indiquées ci-dessus, dans le souci de garantir des conditions de concurrence équitable dans le secteur du sucre au sein de l'Union européenne et de mettre en place des règles cohérentes qui régissent les importations, il convient de limiter clairement dans le temps les importations de sucre à un droit avantageux.
For the above reasons, and in order to guarantee fair competition in the Union's sugar sector and the fixing of definitive import rules, the possibility of importing sugar at preferential duties should apply for a clearly restricted period of time.
L'amendement proposé par le rapporteur va dans ce sens.
The amendment tabled by the rapporteur proposes a possible time limit.
Contingents tarifaires pour des importations en Bulgarie et en Roumanie de sucre de canne
Tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar
Date de l’annonce en séance
Date announced in plenary
Date de la nomination
Date appointed
Date de l’adoption
Date adopted
Peter Baco, Sergio Berlato, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Dumitru Gheorghe Mircea Coşea, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Atilla Béla Ladislau Kelemen, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Véronique Mathieu, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
Peter Baco, Sergio Berlato, Niels Busk, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Giuseppe Castiglione, Dumitru Gheorghe Mircea Coşea, Albert Deß, Michl Ebner, Carmen Fraga Estévez, Jean-Claude Fruteau, Ioannis Gklavakis, Bogdan Golik, Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, Atilla Béla Ladislau Kelemen, Heinz Kindermann, Diamanto Manolakou, Véronique Mathieu, Neil Parish, Radu Podgorean, María Isabel Salinas García, Agnes Schierhuber, Alyn Smith, Marc Tarabella, Donato Tommaso Veraldi, Andrzej Tomasz Zapałowski
Christa Klaß, Albert Jan Maat, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Brian Simpson, Struan Stevenson
Christa Klaß, Albert Jan Maat, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Brian Simpson, Struan Stevenson
PE 378.855v02-00
PE 378.855v02-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................21
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................19
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............26
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY...............24
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 38
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 36
относно предложението за директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно наказателните мерки, предназначени да гарантират зачитането на правата на интелектуална собственост
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal measures aimed at ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета (COM2006(0168))
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0168 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 95 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението му е представено от Комисията ( C6‑0233/2005 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0233/2005 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси и становищата на комисия по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика и на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0073/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0073/2007 ),
(5) Директива 2004/48/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 29 април 2004 г. относно зачитането на правата на интелектуална собственост предвижда мерки, процедури и средства за защита по граждански и административен ред.
(5) Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights lays down measures, procedures and civil and administrative remedies.
Разпоредбите на посочената директива е необходимо да бъдат допълнени с набор от достатъчно възпиращи санкции, които да са приложими на цялата територия на Общността.
A sufficiently dissuasive set of penalties applicable throughout the Community is needed to make the provisions laid down in this Directive complete.
Необходимо е да се хармонизират някои наказателни разпоредби, за да може да се води ефективна борба с фалшифицирането и пиратството на вътрешния пазар.
Certain criminal provisions need to be harmonised so that counterfeiting and piracy in the internal market can be combated effectively.
Общностният законодател има правомощието да приема необходимите наказателноправни мерки, за да се гарантира пълната ефективност на предвижданите от него правила относно закрилата на интелектуалната собственост.
The Community legislator has the power to take the criminal-law measures that are necessary to guarantee the full effectiveness of the rules it lays down on the protection of intellectual property.
Общностният законодател има правомощието да приема необходимите наказателноправни мерки, за да се гарантира пълната ефективност на предвижданите от него правила относно закрилата на интелектуалната собственост , установени в настоящата директива и които не засягат патентите .
The Community legislator has the power to take the criminal-law measures that are necessary to guarantee the full effectiveness of the rules it lays down on the protection of intellectual property , as defined by this Directive, other than patents .
This amendment is necessary to ensure consistency with subsequent amendments and to establish from the outset the scope of the directive.
This amendment is necessary to ensure consistency with subsequent amendments and to establish from the outset the scope of the directive.
Съображение 6 а (ново)
Recital 6 a (new)
(6а) В своя резолюция от 7 септември 2006 г. относно фалшифицирането на лекарства Европейският парламент е счел, че Европейската общност следва спешно да осигури средства, за да доведе до успешен край борбата с незаконните практики в областта на интелектуалното пиратство и фалшифицирането на лекарства.
(6a) In its resolution of 7 September 2006 on counterfeiting of medicinal products, the European Parliament took the view that the European Union should equip itself as a matter of urgency with the means to combat effectively illicit practices in the area of piracy and the counterfeiting of medicines.
According to 2005 customs statistics on the seizure of counterfeit goods at the European Union's frontiers, seizures of counterfeit medicines increased by 100% in 2005 compared to 2004.
According to 2005 customs statistics on the seizure of counterfeit goods at the European Union's frontiers, seizures of counterfeit medicines increased by 100% in 2005 compared to 2004.
(8) Трябва да се предвидят разпоредби за улесняване на наказателните разследвания.
(8) Provisions must be laid down to facilitate criminal investigations.
Държавите-членки трябва да гарантират допускането на титуляри на права на интелектуална собственост или на техни представители, както и на експерти, да подпомагат разследванията, водени от съвместни екипи за разследване.
The Member States must ensure that the holders of intellectual property rights concerned, or their representatives, and experts are allowed to assist the investigations carried out by joint investigation teams.
Съдействието на засегнатите титуляри на права на интелектуална собственост трябва да има поддържаща функция, която не засяга провеждането на безпристрастно разследване от страна на държавните органи .
The involvement of the holders of intellectual property rights concerned should constitute a supporting role that will not interfere with the neutrality of the state investigations.
It should be made clear that the involvement of injured parties in investigations carried out by the police or public prosecutors’ offices must not jeopardise the neutrality of those state investigation agencies.
It should be made clear that the involvement of injured parties in investigations carried out by the police or public prosecutors’ offices must not jeopardise the neutrality of those state investigation agencies.
Maintaining objectivity and neutrality is part and parcel of the rule of law.
Maintaining objectivity and neutrality is part and parcel of the rule of law.
Съображение 9 а (ново)
Recital 9 a (new)
(9а) Правата, установени в Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз трябва да се спазват напълно при определянето на престъпни деяния и наказания, по време на разследвания и в хода на съдебното производство.
(9a) The rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union should be fully respected when defining criminal acts and penalties, during investigations and in the course of judicial proceedings.
(10) Настоящата директива не засяга специфичните режими на отговорност, предвидени за доставчиците на интернет услуги в членове от 12 до 15 от Директива 2000/31/ЕО относно електронната търговия.
(10) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down for Internet service providers in Articles 12 to 15 of Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce.
(10) Настоящата директива не засяга специфичните режими на отговорност, предвидени за доставчиците на интернет услуги в Директива 2000/31/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 8 юни 2000 г. относно определени правни аспекти на услугите на информационното общество, и по-специално на електронната търговия на вътрешния пазар¹.
(10) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down for Internet service providers by Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce , in the Internal Market 1 .
(10а) Настоящата директива не засяга специфични режими на отговорност, такива като установените в директива 2001/29/ЕО на Европейския парламент и Съвета от 22 май 2001 г. относно хармонизирането на някои аспекти на авторското право и сродните му права в информационното общество¹.
(10a) This Directive does not affect specific liability systems such as that laid down by Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society 1 .
(12а) Необходимо е да се гарантира адекватна закрила на правата на интелектуална собственост в аудиовизуалния сектор, както е указано в директива 98/84/ЕО на Европейския парламент и Съвета от 20 ноември 1998 г. относно правната защита на услугите, които се основават на или се предоставят при условен достъп¹.
(12a) It is necessary to ensure adequate protection of intellectual property rights in the audiovisual sector, as indicated by Directive 98/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 1998 on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access 1 .
Directive 98/84/EC is currently the only protection established at European level to safeguard audiovisual rights against the growing threat of piracy and counterfeiting.
Directive 98/84/EC is currently the only protection established at European level to safeguard audiovisual rights against the growing threat of piracy and counterfeiting.
Such protection is provided chiefly by means of conditional access, in other words technical measures to control the use of audiovisual content transmitted in encoded form.
Such protection is provided chiefly by means of conditional access, in other words technical measures to control the use of audiovisual content transmitted in encoded form.
Bringing infringements of conditional access within the scope of this directive by including a reference to Directive 98/84/EC would be a significant deterrent for criminal organisations which currently rely on the discrepancies between the rules applied in the various Member States enabling them to infringe audiovisual rights with impunity.
Bringing infringements of conditional access within the scope of this directive by including a reference to Directive 98/84/EC would be a significant deterrent for criminal organisations which currently rely on the discrepancies between the rules applied in the various Member States enabling them to infringe audiovisual rights with impunity.
С настоящата директива се определят наказателните мерки, необходими за гарантиране зачитането на правата на интелектуална собственост.
This Directive lays down the criminal measures necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights.
С настоящата директива се определят наказателните мерки, необходими за гарантиране зачитането на правата на интелектуална собственост , както е установено по-надолу в контекста на фалшифицирането и пиратството .
This Directive lays down the criminal measures necessary to ensure the enforcement of intellectual property rights , as defined below in the context of counterfeiting and piracy.
The goals of the proposals will be best achieved if the directive expressly focuses on counterfeiting and piracy.
The goals of the proposals will be best achieved if the directive expressly focuses on counterfeiting and piracy.
Its current wording could indeed criminalize IPR disputes that are essentially of a civil nature and occur between legitimate commercial enterprises.
Its current wording could indeed criminalize IPR disputes that are essentially of a civil nature and occur between legitimate commercial enterprises.
The amendment seeks to establish more precisely the scope of the directive by referring to the definitions in a subsequent amendment.
The amendment seeks to establish more precisely the scope of the directive by referring to the definitions in a subsequent amendment.
Тези мерки се прилагат за правата на интелектуална собственост, предвидени в общностното законодателство и/или в националното законодателство на държавите-членки .
These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights provided for in Community legislation and/or national legislation in the Member States .
Тези мерки се прилагат за правата на интелектуална собственост , които не се отнасят до патентите , предвидени в общностното законодателство.
These measures shall apply to intellectual property rights , other than patents, provided for in Community legislation.
This amendment seeks to delimit the scope of the directive from the outset.
This amendment seeks to delimit the scope of the directive from the outset.
Права на индустриална собственост, възникнали въз основа на патент, се изключват от разпоредбите на настоящата директива.
Commercial rights under a patent shall be excluded from the provisions of this Directive.