natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Държавите-членки уведомяват Комисията за всяка една акредитация, включително и за оценката на изпълнението на условията по параграф 1 от страна на разплащателната агенция.
Member States shall inform the Commission of any accreditation given, including an assessment of the paying agency's fulfilment of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1.
Държавите-членки също уведомяват Комисията относно всякакви основни промени в структурите или дейността на акредитираните разплащателни агенции, които биха могли да засегнат изпълнението на условията от страна на разплащателните агенции.“
Member States shall also inform the Commission of any major changes in the structures or the functioning of the accredited paying agency which might affect fulfilment of the conditions by the paying agencies."
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of any accreditation given to a paying agency, including an assessment of their fulfilment of the conditions.
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of any accreditation given to a paying agency, including an assessment of their fulfilment of the conditions.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their accreditation procedures.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their accreditation procedures.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 Б (нова) Член 6, параграф 4 (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 B (new) Article 6, paragraph 4 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
1б) В член 6 параграф 4 се заменя, както следва:
(1b) In Article 6, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
В случаите, в които акредитирана разплащателна агенция не отговаря или вече е престанала да отговаря на едно или повече от условията по параграф 1, Комисията може да оттегли акредитацията й, освен ако държавата-членка не извърши необходимите промени в срок, който се определя от Комисията в съответствие със сериозността на проблема.“
Where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets one or more of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission may withdraw accreditation unless the Member State makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined by the Commission according to the severity of the problem."
In order to further improve the Commission's ability to comply with Article 274 EC, the example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the Member States who joined in 2004 and 2007 should also be applied in the older Member States.
In order to further improve the Commission's ability to comply with Article 274 EC, the example of the Commission's monitoring of paying agencies in the Member States who joined in 2004 and 2007 should also be applied in the older Member States.
Indeed, it is the Commission under Article 274 EC, which is responsible for the implementation of the EU budget.
Indeed, it is the Commission under Article 274 EC, which is responsible for the implementation of the EU budget.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 В (нова) Член 6, параграф 4 a (нов) (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 C (new) Article 6, paragraph 4 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
1в) В член 6 се добавя параграф 4а, както следва:
(1c) In Article 6, the following paragraph 4a is added:
Комисията наблюдава акредитирането на разплащателни агенции, извършвано от държавите-членки.
The Commission shall monitor the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States.
Когато акредитирана разплащателна агенция не отговаря или е престанала да отговаря на едно или повече от условията, посочени в параграф 1, Комисията разпорежда на акредитиращата държава-членка да оттегли акредитацията, освен ако разплащателната агенция не извърши необходимите промени в срок, който се определя в зависимост от сериозността на проблема.
Where an accredited paying agency does not meet or no longer meets one or more of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, the Commission shall order the accrediting Member State to withdraw the accreditation unless the paying agency makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined by the Commission according to the severity of the problem."
The Commission should have an official obligation to monitor (both actively and passively) the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States.
The Commission should have an official obligation to monitor (both actively and passively) the accreditation of paying agencies by the Member States.
In case of any misconduct found the Commission should also be obliged to act.
In case of any misconduct found the Commission should also be obliged to act.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 Г (нова) Член 7 (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 D (new) Article 7 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
1г) Член 7 се заменя, както следва:
(1d) Article 7 is replaced by the following:
„Органи по сертифициране
"Certification bodies
Органът по сертифициране е публично или частно юридическо лице, определено от държавата-членка да сертифицира достоверността, изчерпателността и точността на счетоводните отчети на акредитираната разплащателна агенция, като се съобразява с въведените системи за управление и контрол.
The certification body shall be a public or private legal entity designated by the Member State with a view to certifying the truthfulness, completeness and accuracy of the accounts of the accredited paying agency, taking account of management and control systems.
В случаите, в които орган по сертифициране не може да изпълнява или вече е престанал да бъде в състояние да изпълнява задачите си, държавата-членка оттегля решението си за определянето му като орган по сертифициране, освен ако той не извърши необходимите промени в срок, който се определя в съответствие със сериозността на проблема.
Where a certification body cannot perform or can no longer perform its tasks, the Member State shall withdraw the designation unless the certification body makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined according to the severity of the problem.
Държавите-членки уведомяват Комисията за определянето на органи по сертифициране, включително и за оценката за способността на всеки един орган по сертифициране да изпълнява упоменатите задачи.
Member States shall inform the Commission of the designation of certification bodies, including an assessment of the certification bodies' ability to perform the tasks mentioned.
Държавите-членки също така уведомяват Комисията в случай на каквито и да са основни промени в структурите или работата на органите по сертифициране, които е възможно да засегнат способността на същите да изпълняват задачите си.
Member States shall also inform the Commission in the case of any major changes to the structures or the functioning of the certification bodies which might possibly affect the certification bodies' ability to perform their tasks.
Комисията наблюдава определянето на органи по сертифициране, извършвано от държавите-членки, както и работата на тези органи.
The Commission shall monitor the designation of certification bodies by the Member States , as well as their functioning.
Когато орган по сертифициране не може да изпълнява или е престанал да бъде в състояние да изпълнява задачите си, Комисията разпорежда на съответната държава-членка да оттегли решението за определяне на този орган като орган по сертифициране, освен ако той не извърши необходимите промени в срок, който се определя в съответствие със сериозността на проблема.”
Where a certification body cannot perform or no longer can perform its tasks, the Commission shall order the designating Member State to withdraw the designation unless the certification body makes the necessary changes within a period to be determined according to the severity of the problem."
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of the designation of certification bodies, including an assessment of their ability to perform the desired tasks.
Member States should be obliged to inform the Commission of the designation of certification bodies, including an assessment of their ability to perform the desired tasks.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the designation of certification bodies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their designating procedures.
This will enable the Commission to monitor the designation of certification bodies by the Member States and it will stimulate Member States to improve their designating procedures.
The Commission should have an official obligation to monitor (both actively and passively) the designation of certification bodies by the Member States.
The Commission should have an official obligation to monitor (both actively and passively) the designation of certification bodies by the Member States.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 1 Д (нова) Член 9, параграф 3 a (нов) (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 E (new) Article 9, paragraph 3 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
1д) В член 9 се добавя параграф 3а, както следва:
(1e) In Article 9, the following paragraph 3a is added:
Без да се накърняват гореспоменатите задължения, всяка държава-членка, преди да получи финансиране от Общността през година N и на ежегодна основа, като част от годишната справка, предвидена в член 3б, параграф 3 от Финансовия регламент, публикува на подходящо национално равнище декларация въз основа на наличните одити и декларации, в която заявява, че структурите за финансов контрол, изисквани от законодателството на Общността, са налице и функционират добре.“
Without prejudice to the abovementioned obligations, each Member State shall, at the appropriate national level, prior to receiving Community funding in year N and on an annual basis, as part of the annual summary set out in Article 53b(3) of the Financial Regulation, issue a statement, based on available audits and declarations, declaring that the financial control structures required by Community law are in place and functioning."
Implementation of Article 44, Part III on Sound Financial Management of EU Funds of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 May 2006.
Implementation of Article 44, Part III on Sound Financial Management of EU Funds of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 May 2006.
It is intended to ensure effective, efficient and integrated control of Community funds.
It is intended to ensure effective, efficient and integrated control of Community funds.
Член 17 а, параграф 2, буква a) (Регламент (ЕО) 1290/2005)
Article 17a, paragraph 2, point (a) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
а) Комисията вече е взела решение, с най–малко две решения по смисъла на член 31, да изключи от финансиране от Общността разходи на съответната държава–членка за същия размер и на същите основания;
(a) the Commission has already decided, by means of at least two decisions pursuant to Article 31, to exclude from Community financing expenditure from the Member State concerned for the same measure and for the same reasons;
а) Комисията вече е взела решение, с най–малко две решения по смисъла на член 31 относно една и съща разплащателна агенция на държава-членка , да изключи от финансиране от Общността разходи на съответната държава–членка за същия размер и на същите основания.
(a) the Commission has already decided, by means of at least two decisions pursuant to Article 31 concerning the same paying agency in a Member State , to exclude from Community financing expenditure from the Member State concerned for the same measure and for the same reasons.
Това условие се счита за изпълнено и в случаите, в които второто решение не засяга същата разплащателна агенция в дадена държава-членка, ако обстоятелствата като цяло сочат, че установеният в първата разплащателна агенция проблем не е бил отстранен.
This condition shall be considered to be met in cases where the second decision does not concern the same paying agency in a Member State , but where the overall circumstances show that the problem identified at the paying agency which was first audited has not been remedied.
The aim of this amendment is to ensure that Member States with several paying agencies do not face a higher risk of preventive penalties being imposed than Member States with only one.
The aim of this amendment is to ensure that Member States with several paying agencies do not face a higher risk of preventive penalties being imposed than Member States with only one.
There may be cases, however, where it is clear that a given problem is common to all the paying agencies in a Member State.
There may be cases, however, where it is clear that a given problem is common to all the paying agencies in a Member State.
In such cases, a second audit of the same paying agency would seem to be an example of unnecessarily rigid practice.
In such cases, a second audit of the same paying agency would seem to be an example of unnecessarily rigid practice.
Your rapporteur welcomes the proposed improvement to the protection of the Community's budget interests.
Your rapporteur welcomes the proposed improvement to the protection of the Community's budget interests.
Член 17 а, параграф 2, буква a) (Регламент (ЕО) 1290/2005)
Article 17 a, paragraph 2, point (a) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
а) Комисията вече е взела решение, с най–малко две решения по смисъла на член 31, да изключи от финансиране от Общността разходи на съответната държава–членка за същия размер и на същите основания;
a) the Commission has already decided, by means of at least two decisions pursuant to Article 31, to exclude from Community financing expenditure from the Member State concerned for the same measure and for the same reasons;
There is a clear need to clarify that Article 17a will only be implemented in respect of measures which enter into effect after the entry into force of this regulation and that retroactive implementation is excluded.
There is a clear need to clarify that Article 17a will only be implemented in respect of measures which enter into effect after the entry into force of this regulation and that retroactive implementation is excluded.
Член 17а, параграф 3, алинея 2 (Регламент (ЕО) № 1290/2005)
Article 17a, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
Процентът, с който месечните плащания могат да бъдат намалени или прекратени, е равен на процента, определен от Комисията в нейното последно решение съгласно параграф 2, буква а).
The percentage by which the monthly payments may be reduced or suspended shall be equal to the percentage decided by the Commission in its latest decision as referred to in paragraph 2(a).
Този процент се намалява, ако междувременно държавата-членка е предприела стъпки за отстраняване на недостатъците, установени от Комисията в последното й решение.
This percentage shall be reduced if in the meantime the Member State has gone some way towards remedying the shortcomings identified by the Commission in its latest decision.
Комисията може да вземе решение да увеличи процента ежегодно, ако посочените недостатъци съществуват вече от четири години или по-дълго.
The Commission may decide to increase this percentage annually if the said shortcomings have persisted for four years or longer.
The Commission proposal fails to take account of cases where a Member State has at least made some effort to remedy the shortcomings identified by the Commission in its latest decision.
The Commission proposal fails to take account of cases where a Member State has at least made some effort to remedy the shortcomings identified by the Commission in its latest decision.
In that event, the Commission's decision to reduce or suspend payments might be disproportionate to the seriousness of the shortcomings.
In that event, the Commission's decision to reduce or suspend payments might be disproportionate to the seriousness of the shortcomings.
As a matter of principle, EU law rules out such a course of action.
As a matter of principle, EU law rules out such a course of action.
If the reduction or suspension were to be applied only retrospectively, the seriousness of the problem would also have to be taken into account when setting the percentage of the reduction or suspension.
If the reduction or suspension were to be applied only retrospectively, the seriousness of the problem would also have to be taken into account when setting the percentage of the reduction or suspension.
The Commission must also be able, at a given moment, if the shortcomings persist, to impose higher percentage reductions, in order step up the pressure on Member States to make changes to their systems.
The Commission must also be able, at a given moment, if the shortcomings persist, to impose higher percentage reductions, in order step up the pressure on Member States to make changes to their systems.
Член 17 а, параграф 3 а (нов) (Регламент (ЕО) 1290/2005)
Article 17 a, paragraph 3 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
Ако в рамките на уравняването на сметките държавата-членка докаже, че решеното съгласно настоящия член намаляване или преустановяване на месечните плащания не е достатъчно обосновано, сумите, съответстващи на намаленията или на преустановените плащания, се възстановяват на държавата-членка заедно със законните и обичайни разноски съгласно търговската практика.
Insofar as a Member State proves during the settlement of accounts procedure that the reductions in or deferment of monthly payments imposed in accordance with this article are not sufficiently justified, the amounts corresponding to the reductions or deferments of payments in question shall be returned forthwith to the Member State, together with the usual legal exchange transaction charges.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 5 A (нова)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 5 A (new)
Член 31, параграф 2 (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
Article 31, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
5а) В член 31, параграф 2 се заменя, както следва:
(5a) In Article 31, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:
Комисията извършва оценка на сумите, които се изключват въз основа на сериозността на отчетеното несъответствие.
The Commission shall assess the amounts to be excluded on the basis of the gravity of the non-conformity recorded.
При оценката надлежно се взема предвид естеството, продължителността и сериозността на нарушението и на финансовата щета, причинена на Общността.”
It shall take due account of the nature, duration and gravity of the infringement and of the financial damage caused to the Community."
In addition to the nature and gravity of the infringement, its duration must also be taken into account in the Commission's assessment of the amounts to be excluded from financing in the event of non-conformity.
In addition to the nature and gravity of the infringement, its duration must also be taken into account in the Commission's assessment of the amounts to be excluded from financing in the event of non-conformity.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 6 A (нова) Член 31, параграф 5 a (нов) (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 A (new) Article 31, paragraph 5 a (new) (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
6 a ) В член 31 се добавя следният параграф:
(6a) In Article 31, the following paragraph is added:
Комисията изготвя годишен доклад, който представя в обобщен вид сумите, които са изключени от финансирането от бюджета на Общността във връзка с нарушения от държавите-членки на техните задължения съгласно Регламент (ЕИО) № 4045/89 на Съвета* , както и сумите, които не могат да бъдат изключени поради липсата на навременно уведомяване на държавите-членки, както се предвижда в параграф 5, буква в).
The Commission shall draw up an annual report which summarises the amounts excluded from Community financing, following infringements by Member States of their obligations under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4045/89 * , as well as the amounts which could not be excluded due to failure to notify Member States in time, as provided for in paragraph 5(c).
В първия годишен доклад също така се обобщават данните, определени в горната алинея, относно вече изминали години, включени в предишна финансова перспектива.
The first annual report shall also summarise the data described in the previous subparagraph for already completed years of the previous financial perspective.
Your draftsman would be interested to learn what amounts of Community finance have been lost due to the problem that the Commission intends to solve with their proposal under Article 1, point 6.
Your draftsman would be interested to learn what amounts of Community finance have been lost due to the problem that the Commission intends to solve with their proposal under Article 1, point 6.
Moreover, it would be interesting to monitor the effectiveness of this exception.
Moreover, it would be interesting to monitor the effectiveness of this exception.
ЧЛЕН 1, ТОЧКА 6 Б (нова) Член 32, параграф 5 (Регламент (EО) № 1290/2005)
ARTICLE 1, POINT 6 B (new) Article 32, paragraph 5 (Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005)
6б) В член 32 параграф 5 се заменя, както следва:
(6b) In Article 32, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following:
Ако сумата не е върната в срок от четири години от произнасянето на първоначалното административно или съдебно заключение или в срок от осем години в случаите, в които са предприети мерки за връщане на сумата чрез националните съдилища, финансовите последици от невръщането й се понасят от съответната държава-членка.
If recovery has not taken place within four years of the primary administrative or judicial finding, or within eight years where recovery action is taken in the national courts, the financial consequences of non-recovery shall be borne by the Member State concerned.
Разрешава се преходен период от 5 години.
A transitional period of 5 years shall be allowed .
Държавите-членки посочват отделно в обобщения доклад, упоменат в първа алинея на параграф 3, сумите, които не са възстановени в сроковете, определени в първа алинея на настоящия параграф.
Member States shall indicate separately in the summary report referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 3 the amounts not recovered within the time-limits specified in the first subparagraph.
В случаите, в които в рамките на процедурата по възстановяване на сумите се установи с окончателен характер посредством административен или правен инструмент липсата на каквито и да е нередности, съответната държава-членка декларира като разход пред ЕФГЗ финансовата тежест , поета от нея по силата на първата алинея.
Where, in the context of the recovery procedure, the absence of any irregularity is recorded by an administrative or legal instrument of a definitive nature, the Member State concerned shall declare as expenditure to the EAGF the financial burden borne by it under the first subparagraph.
При все това, ако по причини, които не зависят от съответната държава-членка, подлежащата на връщане сума не може да бъде върната в сроковете, посочени в първата алинея, и размерът на тази сума надвишава 1 млн. EUR, Комисията може по искане на държавата-членка да удължи сроковете с максимално 50% от продължителността на първоначалните срокове.“
However, if, for reasons not attributable to the Member State concerned, recovery could not take place within the time-limits specified in the first subparagraph, and the amount to be recovered exceeds EUR 1 million, the Commission may, at the request of the Member State , extend the time-limits by a maximum of 50 % of the initial time-limits."
(Същият текст като в Регламент (ЕО) № 1290/2005, но са заличени части от първата алинея, както и цялата трета алинея)
(Same wording as that of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, but deleting parts of subparagraph 1 and the whole subparagraph 3)
This means that even when not recovering any sum, the Member State is only liable for 50% of the amounts.
This means that even when not recovering any sum, the Member State is only liable for 50% of the amounts.
The Council Regulation already foresees that if the Member State concerned can prove the absence of an irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts.
The Council Regulation already foresees that if the Member State concerned can prove the absence of an irregularity by a definitive administrative or court decision it may even keep 100% of the amounts.
A general rule on equal burden sharing therefore seems excessive.
A general rule on equal burden sharing therefore seems excessive.