natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Scientific integration implies a common process of evaluation and selection of projects based on scientific excellence and economic impact.
Scientific integration implies a common process of evaluation and selection of projects based on scientific excellence and economic impact.
Management integration will be achieved by means of a dedicated implementation structure (the EUREKA Secretariat) and financial integration by the establishment of a multi-annual financing plan with the funds contributed by the participating countries and the Community.
Management integration will be achieved by means of a dedicated implementation structure (the EUREKA Secretariat) and financial integration by the establishment of a multi-annual financing plan with the funds contributed by the participating countries and the Community.
EUROSTARS will fund multipartner transnational projects in any field of science and technology initiated and led by R&D performing SMEs but open to other type of participants (universities, research organisations, large companies), although the core part of the project should be performed by the SME.
EUROSTARS will fund multipartner transnational projects in any field of science and technology initiated and led by R&D performing SMEs but open to other type of participants (universities, research organisations, large companies), although the core part of the project should be performed by the SME.
Research activities should be market oriented and aimed at short to medium term commercial results.
Research activities should be market oriented and aimed at short to medium term commercial results.
Implementation of EUROSTARS
Implementation of EUROSTARS
The joint programme will be implemented through a dedicated implementation structure which will act as a single entry point for proposals, submitted after each yearly call for proposals.
The joint programme will be implemented through a dedicated implementation structure which will act as a single entry point for proposals, submitted after each yearly call for proposals.
Project proposals will be evaluated and selected at central level on the basis of eligibility and evaluation criteria with the help of independent experts.The ranking of proposals will be performed by an international evaluation panel of independent experts.
Project proposals will be evaluated and selected at central level on the basis of eligibility and evaluation criteria with the help of independent experts.The ranking of proposals will be performed by an international evaluation panel of independent experts.
The ranking list shall be binding for for the allocation of funding from the community contribution and from national funds earmarked to EUROSTARS projects.
The ranking list shall be binding for for the allocation of funding from the community contribution and from national funds earmarked to EUROSTARS projects.
Project participants in selected projects will be handled administratively by their respective national programmes.
Project participants in selected projects will be handled administratively by their respective national programmes.
This rapporteur is concerned with the eligibility criteria for SME's in regards the percentage of contribution to the costs of the projects both in terms of investment and full-time equivalent and the percentage of annual turnover spent in research activities.
This rapporteur is concerned with the eligibility criteria for SME's in regards the percentage of contribution to the costs of the projects both in terms of investment and full-time equivalent and the percentage of annual turnover spent in research activities.
Therefore, he proposes that an evaluation of these criteria should be made after two years and if needed, an adjustment of these criteria should be made possible.
Therefore, he proposes that an evaluation of these criteria should be made after two years and if needed, an adjustment of these criteria should be made possible.
Another concern is the required contribution of the R&D performing SMEs to the costs of the project (at least 50%) which will exclude many market based SMEs and therefore this rapporteur proposes that this barrier should be set at 25%.
Another concern is the required contribution of the R&D performing SMEs to the costs of the project (at least 50%) which will exclude many market based SMEs and therefore this rapporteur proposes that this barrier should be set at 25%.
In regards implementation, the EUROSTARS joint programme should work in a transparent and non bureaucratic way to facilitate SME participation.
In regards implementation, the EUROSTARS joint programme should work in a transparent and non bureaucratic way to facilitate SME participation.
Therefore, the Community contribution to projects should be made by lump sum payments and in case a lump sum payment is not compatible with the national programmes, there should be a flat rate payment.
Therefore, the Community contribution to projects should be made by lump sum payments and in case a lump sum payment is not compatible with the national programmes, there should be a flat rate payment.
Finally, since the realisation of the EUROSTARS programme is already in an advanced stage, there exists a broad consensus that a rapid handling of the report should take place.
Finally, since the realisation of the EUROSTARS programme is already in an advanced stage, there exists a broad consensus that a rapid handling of the report should take place.
Therefore, this rapporteur will aim to an adoption of the report in the First Reading in plenary.
Therefore, this rapporteur will aim to an adoption of the report in the First Reading in plenary.
Подпомагане на МСП, които извършват научноизследователски и развойни дейности
Support for research and development performing SMEs
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Mary Honeyball, Werner Langen, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Catherine Trautmann, Nikolaos Vakalis, Dominique Vlasto
Šarūnas Birutis, Jan Březina, Jerzy Buzek, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Giles Chichester, Dragoş Florin David, Den Dover, Lena Ek, Adam Gierek, Norbert Glante, András Gyürk, Fiona Hall, David Hammerstein, Rebecca Harms, Erna Hennicot-Schoepges, Mary Honeyball, Werner Langen, Eugenijus Maldeikis, Angelika Niebler, Reino Paasilinna, Atanas Paparizov, Francisca Pleguezuelos Aguilar, Anni Podimata, Miloslav Ransdorf, Vladimír Remek, Herbert Reul, Teresa Riera Madurell, Paul Rübig, Andres Tarand, Britta Thomsen, Catherine Trautmann, Nikolaos Vakalis, Dominique Vlasto
Danutė Budreikaitė, Avril Doyle, Christian Ehler, Neena Gill, Gunnar Hökmark, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Pierre Pribetich, Bernhard Rapkay, Esko Seppänen, Vladimir Urutchev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Danutė Budreikaitė, Avril Doyle, Christian Ehler, Neena Gill, Gunnar Hökmark, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Pierre Pribetich, Bernhard Rapkay, Esko Seppänen, Vladimir Urutchev, Lambert van Nistelrooij
относно предложението за решение на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за мобилизирането на средства от фонд "Солидарност" на Европейския съюз, в приложение на точка 26 от Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the EU Solidarity Fund in application of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management
PE 400.619v02-00
PE 400.619v02-00
ПРИЛОЖЕНИЕ: РЕШЕНИЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ И НА СЪВЕТА.............4
ANNEX: DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.........4
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по регионално развитие ....................................7
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ....................................7
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНОТО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ.....................................9
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................10
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и Съвета (COM (2008)0014 - С6-0036/2008),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0014 - C6-0036/2008 ),
OВ C 139, 14.6.2006 г., стр.1. , и по-специално точка 26 от него,
OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по бюджети и становището на комисията по регионално развитие ( A6‑0065/2008 ),
– having regard to report of the Committee on Budgets and to the opinion of Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0065/2008 ),
2. възлага на своя председател да подпише решението, съвместно с председателя на Съвета и да осигури публикуването му в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз.
Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
OВ C 139, 14.6.2006 г., стp.
OJ C 139, 14.06.2006, p.
1. , и по-специално точка 26 от него,
1. , and in particular point 26 thereof,
като взеха предвид Регламент (ЕО) № 2012/2002 на Съвета от 11 ноември 2002 г. за създаване на фонд „Солидарност“
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund
(1) Европейският съюз създаде фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз („Фонда“) в израз на солидарност с населението от регионите, засегнати от бедствия.
(1) The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund ("the Fund") to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.
(2) Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. позволява мобилизиране на средства от Фонда в рамките на годишния таван от 1 млрд. евро.
(2) The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.
(3) Регламент (ЕО) № 2012/2002 съдържа разпоредбите, съгласно които се мобилизират средствата от Фонда.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.
(4) Обединеното кралство внесе заявление за мобилизиране на средства от Фонда във връзка с бедствие, причинено от наводнение през юни и юли 2007 г.
(4) The United Kingdom submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding in June and July 2007,
За общия бюджет на Европейския съюз за 2008 финансова година фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз се мобилизира за осигуряване на сумата от 162°387°985 евро под формата на бюджетни кредити за поети задължения и бюджетни кредити за плащания.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2008, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 162 387 985 in commitment and payment appropriations.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of the United Kingdom on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the European Solidarity Fund in favour of the United Kingdom on the basis of point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006.
The Commission has presented an amending budget (AB No 1/20o8) in order to enter in the 2008 budget specific commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
The Commission has presented an amending budget (AB No 1/20o8) in order to enter in the 2008 budget specific commitment and payment appropriation as foreseen in point 26 of the IIA.
The UK applied for assistance from the Fund, following floods that caused serious damage in June and July of last year.
The UK applied for assistance from the Fund, following floods that caused serious damage in June and July of last year.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 162 387 985, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
The Commission proposes to mobilise the EU solidarity Fund for a total amount of EUR 162 387 985, to be allocated under heading 3b of the Financial Framework.
According to point 26 of the IIA, a trialogue should have been held before the two arms of the budgetary authority give their agreement to the mobilisation.
According to point 26 of the IIA, a trialogue should have been held before the two arms of the budgetary authority give their agreement to the mobilisation.
Due to the urgency the amending budget 1/2008 of which the proposal for a decision is part, the trialogue has not taken place and a simplified procedure has been followed, allowing both the Council and the Parliament to rapidly adopt the text.
Due to the urgency the amending budget 1/2008 of which the proposal for a decision is part, the trialogue has not taken place and a simplified procedure has been followed, allowing both the Council and the Parliament to rapidly adopt the text.
Before the adoption by the Committee on Budgets, a debate has been held amongst the Members of this committee and the representatives of both the European Commission and the UK administration, in order to give visibility to the role played by the Parliament in the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
Before the adoption by the Committee on Budgets, a debate has been held amongst the Members of this committee and the representatives of both the European Commission and the UK administration, in order to give visibility to the role played by the Parliament in the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund.
The Committee on Regional Development, asked for an opinion, expressed itself in favour of the mobilisation.
The Committee on Regional Development, asked for an opinion, expressed itself in favour of the mobilisation.
DIRECT DAMAGE
DIRECT DAMAGE
AID PROPOSED
AID PROPOSED
UK , Floods June/July 2007
UK , Floods June/July 2007
4 612 000 000
4 612 000 000
162 387 985
162 387 985
по предложение за решение на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно мобилизирането на средства от фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund
Комисията по регионално развитие призовава водещата комисия по бюджети да включи следните предложения в своето предложение за резолюция:
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Budgets as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
Комисията по регионално развитие не намира причина да се противопостави на мобилизирането на средства от фонд „Солидарност“ с цел осигуряване на сумата от 162 387 985 EUR на Обединеното кралство, както предлага Комисията в съответствие с Междуинституционалното споразумение от 17 май 2006 г. между Европейския парламент, Съвета и Комисията относно бюджетната дисциплина и доброто финансово управление и Регламент (EО) № 2012/2002 на Съвета от 11 ноември 2002 година относно създаване на фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз.
The Committee on Regional Development sees no reason to object to the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund to provide the sum of EUR 162.387.985 to the United Kingdom, as proposed by the Commission, in accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management and Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund.
Комисията по регионално развитие използва случая да настоява пред Съвета за постигането на споразумение по предложението на Комисията за Регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно създаването на фонд „Солидарност“ на Европейския съюз ( COM(2005)0108 ), което той не успя да направи откакто Парламентът прие позицията му на първо четене на 18 май 2006 г.
The Committee on Regional Development seizes the opportunity to press Council to reach agreement on the Commission's proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund ( COM(2005)0108 ) which it has failed to do since Parliament adopted its position at first reading on 18 May 2006
Комисията по регионално развитие призовава комисията по бюджети да изработва в бъдеще графици, които зачитат правата на другите комисии.
The Committee on Regional Development calls on the Committee on Budgets to establish in the future timetables which respect other Committee rights.
In order to avoid undue delay in approving this measure which the committee on Budgets intends to adopt as soon as possible, the committee on Regional Development has no objection to the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund to provide the sum of Euro 162.387.985 to the United Kingdom as proposed by The European Commission and in accordance with the rules laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and Regulation N° 2012/2002.
In order to avoid undue delay in approving this measure which the committee on Budgets intends to adopt as soon as possible, the committee on Regional Development has no objection to the mobilisation of the Solidarity Fund to provide the sum of Euro 162.387.985 to the United Kingdom as proposed by The European Commission and in accordance with the rules laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 and Regulation N° 2012/2002.
It is however noticeable that the flood damage for which the United Kingdom has applied for assistance took place in June and July 2007 whilst the Commission's proposal is dated 18 January 2008, - a full six months after the event.
It is however noticeable that the flood damage for which the United Kingdom has applied for assistance took place in June and July 2007 whilst the Commission's proposal is dated 18 January 2008, - a full six months after the event.
Clearly, factual verification of the amount of financial damage suffered requires some time, and it is in carrying out its duty to ensure good financial management and the correct application of the rules, that the Commission takes the time required.
Clearly, factual verification of the amount of financial damage suffered requires some time, and it is in carrying out its duty to ensure good financial management and the correct application of the rules, that the Commission takes the time required.
In the view of our committee, it is equally important to ensure that parliamentary control of such disbursements is correctly exercised and consequently committees who are asked for an opinion on decisions of this type should be given the time necessary to give proper consideration to Commission's proposals.
In the view of our committee, it is equally important to ensure that parliamentary control of such disbursements is correctly exercised and consequently committees who are asked for an opinion on decisions of this type should be given the time necessary to give proper consideration to Commission's proposals.
Alfonso Andria, Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Jim Higgins, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Rumiana Jeleva, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Dimitar Stoyanov, Margie Sudre, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Oldřich Vlasák
Alfonso Andria, Emmanouil Angelakas, Stavros Arnaoutakis, Elspeth Attwooll, Rolf Berend, Jana Bobošíková, Victor Boştinaru, Antonio De Blasio, Petru Filip, Gerardo Galeote, Iratxe García Pérez, Eugenijus Gentvilas, Pedro Guerreiro, Gábor Harangozó, Marian Harkin, Jim Higgins, Mieczysław Edmund Janowski, Rumiana Jeleva, Tunne Kelam, Evgeni Kirilov, Constanze Angela Krehl, Jamila Madeira, Mario Mantovani, Sérgio Marques, Miroslav Mikolášik, James Nicholson, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Jan Olbrycht, Maria Petre, Markus Pieper, Pierre Pribetich, Wojciech Roszkowski, Grażyna Staniszewska, Catherine Stihler, Dimitar Stoyanov, Margie Sudre, Andrzej Jan Szejna, Oldřich Vlasák
Jan Březina, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Zita Pleštinská, Miloslav Ransdorf, László Surján, Iuliu Winkler
Jan Březina, Den Dover, Emanuel Jardim Fernandes, Zita Pleštinská, Miloslav Ransdorf, László Surján, Iuliu Winkler
Janelly Fourtou, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański
Janelly Fourtou, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański
PE 400.300v02-00
PE 400.300v02-00
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE PROPOSED LEGAL BASIS 27
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS ON THE PROPOSED LEGAL BASIS 26
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2007)0466 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0466 ),
– като взе предвид член 66 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно който Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0303/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 66 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0303/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи( A6‑0066/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0066/2008 ),
за създаване на Европейска мрежа за миграцията
establishing a European Migration Network
за създаване на Европейска мрежа за миграцията и убежището
establishing a European Migration and Asylum Network
The European network's job is to collect and exchange information on immigration and asylum, and this should be reflected in its acronym (EMAN).
The European network's job is to collect and exchange information on immigration and asylum, and this should be reflected in its acronym (EMAN).
This amendment seeks to replace 'European Migration Network' with 'European Migration and Asylum Network' and 'EMN' with 'EMAN' throughout the proposal (with the exception of recitals 1 to 5, which refer to the name used to date).
This amendment seeks to replace 'European Migration Network' with 'European Migration and Asylum Network' and 'EMN' with 'EMAN' throughout the proposal (with the exception of recitals 1 to 5, which refer to the name used to date).
(6) ЕММ трябва да избягва повтарянето на работата, извършвана от съществуващи инструменти или структури на Общността, чиято задача е да събират и обменят информация в областите на миграцията и убежището, и да внася добавена стойност в сравнение с тях, по-специално чрез разширяване на обхвата на нейните задачи, поставяне на акцент върху анализа, връзки с академичната общност и предоставяне на обществен достъп до резултатите от работата ѝ.
(6) The EMN should avoid duplicating the work of existing Community instruments or structures whose purpose is to collect and exchange information in the areas of migration and asylum and should provide an added value in comparison with them, in particular through the broad scope of its tasks, a strong focus on analysis, links with the academic community and the public availability of its outputs.