natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The purpose of this protocol is to associate Liechtenstein with the work of the EU in the area of the Schengen acquis by accession of Liechtenstein to the Schengen Agreement with Switzerland
The purpose of this protocol is to associate Liechtenstein with the work of the EU in the area of the Schengen acquis by accession of Liechtenstein to the Schengen Agreement with Switzerland
Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis signed on 26 October 2004.
Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis signed on 26 October 2004.
Article 16 of this Agreement provides for the possibility of Liechtenstein to accede to that Agreement via a protocol. via a protocol.
Article 16 of this Agreement provides for the possibility of Liechtenstein to accede to that Agreement via a protocol. via a protocol.
By letter dated 12 October 2001, Liechtenstein had already expressed its interest in joining Switzerland as a contracting party to a possible Schengen and Dublin acquis association agreements since an open border policy for the movement of persons had existed between Liechtenstein and Switzerland for decades.
By letter dated 12 October 2001, Liechtenstein had already expressed its interest in joining Switzerland as a contracting party to a possible Schengen and Dublin acquis association agreements since an open border policy for the movement of persons had existed between Liechtenstein and Switzerland for decades.
However, Liechtenstein was not associated with the negotiations with Switzerland due to the absence of an agreement on savings taxation between the European Community and Liechtenstein.
However, Liechtenstein was not associated with the negotiations with Switzerland due to the absence of an agreement on savings taxation between the European Community and Liechtenstein.
The European Community and Liechtenstein subsequently concluded such an agreement on savings taxation, which has been in operation since July 2005.
The European Community and Liechtenstein subsequently concluded such an agreement on savings taxation, which has been in operation since July 2005.
As Liechtenstein is acceding to the Schengen agreement with Switzerland, it will have the same rights and obligations as Switzerland.
As Liechtenstein is acceding to the Schengen agreement with Switzerland, it will have the same rights and obligations as Switzerland.
Liechtenstein will have to accept and apply Schengen acquis and its development without any exception or derogation
Liechtenstein will have to accept and apply Schengen acquis and its development without any exception or derogation
However, an exception has been granted, concerning the development of Schengen acquis , if such a development concerns search and seizure requests or orders made for the purposes of investigating or prosecuting offences in the field of direct taxation which, if committed in Liechtenstein, would not be punishable under Liechtenstein law with a custodial penalty (Article 5(5) of the Protocol). .
However, an exception has been granted, concerning the development of Schengen acquis , if such a development concerns search and seizure requests or orders made for the purposes of investigating or prosecuting offences in the field of direct taxation which, if committed in Liechtenstein, would not be punishable under Liechtenstein law with a custodial penalty (Article 5(5) of the Protocol). .
With adoption of new acts or measures, if the content of such acts and measures can become binding on Liechtenstein only after fulfilment of constitutional requirements (a referendum), then Liechtenstein would have 18 months grace period to accept and implement new Schengen legislation
With adoption of new acts or measures, if the content of such acts and measures can become binding on Liechtenstein only after fulfilment of constitutional requirements (a referendum), then Liechtenstein would have 18 months grace period to accept and implement new Schengen legislation
Norway had 6 months, Iceland had 4 weeks, Switzerland had 24 months in order to accept and implement the future Schengen acquis . .
Norway had 6 months, Iceland had 4 weeks, Switzerland had 24 months in order to accept and implement the future Schengen acquis . .
However, in the meantime, Liechtenstein should, where possible, implement the act or measure in question on a provisional basis.
However, in the meantime, Liechtenstein should, where possible, implement the act or measure in question on a provisional basis.
Liechtenstein also becomes a member of the Mixed Committee.
Liechtenstein also becomes a member of the Mixed Committee.
Given the existing cooperation with Switzerland in the field of visa policy and security matters which includes the use of common databases, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to the Schengen Information System and the Visa Information System.
Given the existing cooperation with Switzerland in the field of visa policy and security matters which includes the use of common databases, Liechtenstein may use the technical infrastructure of Switzerland for its access to the Schengen Information System and the Visa Information System.
Although a single text was negotiated with Liechtenstein, the Commission proposes to follow the approach chosen for the signature and adoption of the Schengen agreement with Switzerland.
Although a single text was negotiated with Liechtenstein, the Commission proposes to follow the approach chosen for the signature and adoption of the Schengen agreement with Switzerland.
The Commission proposes thus to adopt the Protocol by two separate acts, one based on the Treaty establishing the European Community (Articles 62, 63(3), 66 and 95) and one based on the Treaty on European Union (Articles 24 and 38).
The Commission proposes thus to adopt the Protocol by two separate acts, one based on the Treaty establishing the European Community (Articles 62, 63(3), 66 and 95) and one based on the Treaty on European Union (Articles 24 and 38).
The European Parliament is consulted on the conclusion of the Protocol in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 300(3)).
The European Parliament is consulted on the conclusion of the Protocol in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 300(3)).
By letter of 21 March 2007 the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs requested, in accordance with Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, an opinion from the Legal Affairs Committee on the legal basis proposed.
By letter of 21 March 2007 the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs requested, in accordance with Rule 35(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, an opinion from the Legal Affairs Committee on the legal basis proposed.
At its meeting of 11 June 2007 the Legal Affairs Committee decided, as the establishment of the Joint/Mixed Committees entails the creation of an organisation structure with a discretion to take decision binding on the contracting parties, in particular with regard to the maintenance of the Agreement and dispute resolution and as the Protocol extends the Joint/Mixed Committees by including Liechtenstein as a contracting party, to recommend that he legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of the European Parliament.
At its meeting of 11 June 2007 the Legal Affairs Committee decided, as the establishment of the Joint/Mixed Committees entails the creation of an organisation structure with a discretion to take decision binding on the contracting parties, in particular with regard to the maintenance of the Agreement and dispute resolution and as the Protocol extends the Joint/Mixed Committees by including Liechtenstein as a contracting party, to recommend that he legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of the European Parliament.
Position of the rapporteur
Position of the rapporteur
The rapporteur supports the conclusion of the Protocol and recommends giving assent to it.
The rapporteur supports the conclusion of the Protocol and recommends giving assent to it.
However, the rapporteur considers that the European Parliament should in future be more closely informed about ongoing international negotiations in order to be able to exercise its competences.
However, the rapporteur considers that the European Parliament should in future be more closely informed about ongoing international negotiations in order to be able to exercise its competences.
Относно: Предложение за решение на Съвета относно подписването от името на Европейската общност и временното прилагане на някои разпоредби на протокола между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност, Швейцарската конфедерация и Княжество Лихтенщайн относно присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейския съюз, Европейската общност и Швейцарската конфедерация за асоцииране на Швейцарската конфедерация към привеждането в изпълнение, прилагането и развиването на достиженията на правото от Шенген (СОМ(2006)0725 - 2006/0251(CNS) )
Subject: Proposal for a Council decision on the signature, on behalf of the European Community, and on the provisional application of certain provisions of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis( COM(2006)0725 – 2006/0251(CNS) )
С писмо от 21 март 2007 г. Вие сезирахте комисията по правни въпроси, съгласно член 35, параграф 2 от правилника, за разглеждане на правилността и целесъобразността на правната основа на горепосоченото предложение на Комисията.
By letter of 21 March 2007 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs pursuant to Rule 35(2), to consider whether the legal basis of the above Commission proposal was valid and appropriate.
Комисията разгледа горепосочения въпрос на заседанието си на 11 юни 2007 г.
The committee considered the above question at its meeting of 11 June 2007.
В цитираното писмо се посочва, че на 13 октомври 2005 г., като е взел предвид становището на комисията по правни въпроси, която е счела член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора от Договора за ЕО за подходяща правна основа, Парламентът е одобрил сключването на споразумение с Швейцария относно асоциирането на Швейцарската конфедерация към привеждането в изпълнение, прилагането и развиването на достиженията на правото от Шенген.
That letter points out that on 13 October 2005 Parliament approved the conclusion of an agreement with Switzerland on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, having regard to the opinion of the Legal Affairs Committee, which considered that the appropriate legal basis was the second paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
Разглежданите предложения се отнасят до подписването на протокол към споразумението с Швейцария с оглед предоставяне на възможност на Княжество Лихтенщайн да се присъедини към същото споразумение.
As regards the proposals now under consideration, these relate to the conclusion of a Protocol to the agreement with Switzerland so as to allow the Principality of Liechtenstein to accede thereto.
Комисията по граждански свободи отбелязва, че присъединяването на Лихтенщайн е предвидено в основното споразумение, а именно в член 16 от Шенгенското споразумение с Швейцария.
The Civil Liberties Committee notes that the accession of Liechtenstein is provided for in the main agreement, namely in Article 16 of the Schengen Agreement with Switzerland.
Комисията отбелязва също, че въпросът относно одобрението на Парламента се поражда още веднъж заради обстоятелството, че с включването на Лихтенщайн като договаряща страна с протокола се разширява съставът на съвместните/смесените комитети.
The Committee further observes that the question concerning the assent of Parliament arises once again due to the fact that the Protocol extends the Joint/Mixed Committees by including Liechtenstein as a contracting party.
Това основание се подсилва от обстоятелството, че комитетът изпълнява роля при вземането на решения във връзка с протокола.
That reason is strengthened by the fact that the Committee play a decision-making role with regard to the Protocol.
Комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи обръща внимание на комисията по правни въпроси на обстоятелството, че същият правен аргумент в подкрепа на включването на член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора (одобрение) като подходяща правна основа, вместо член 300, параграф 3, алинея първа (допитване), би могъл да се приложи по отношение на протокола по същия начин, по който Парламентът заявява, че е бил приложен по отношение на сключването на основното споразумение с Швейцария.
The Committee draws the attention of the Committee on Legal Affairs to the fact that the same legal arguments in support of including Article 300(3), second subparagraph (assent), as the appropriate legal basis instead of Article 300(3), first subparagraph (consultation), could apply to the conclusion of the Protocol in the same way as Parliament argued that they applied with regard to the conclusion of the main agreement with Switzerland.
Относими разпоредби на Договора за ЕС
Pertinent provisions of the EC Treaty
Член 300, параграф 3
Article 300(3)
Съветът сключва споразуменията след като се консултира с Европейския парламент, освен при споразуменията, посочени в член 133, параграф 3, включително и в случаите, когато споразумението обхваща област, за която е необходимо прилагането на процедурата, посочена в член 251 или на посочената в член 252 процедура за приемането на вътрешни правила.
The Council shall conclude agreements after consulting the European Parliament, except for the agreements referred to in Article 133(3), including cases where the agreement covers a field for which the procedure referred to in Article 251 or that referred to in Article 252 is required for the adoption of internal rules.
Европейският парламент представя своето становище в срок, определен от Съвета, в зависимост от спешността на въпроса.
The European Parliament shall deliver its opinion within a time-limit which the Council may lay down according to the urgency of the matter.
При липса на становище в рамките на този срок, Съветът може да действа.
In the absence of an opinion within that time-limit, the Council may act.
Въпросът, който следва да се определи, е дали въпросното споразумение създава специфична институционална структура чрез организирането на процедури за сътрудничество .
The question to be determined is whether the agreement in question establishes a specific institutional framework by organising cooperation procedures.
Предложенията се отнасят конкретно до подписването на протокол относно присъединяването на Лихтенщайн към вече сключено споразумение с Швейцарската конфедерация.
The proposals relate specifically to the signature of a Protocol on the accession of Liechtenstein to an agreement already concluded with the Swiss Confederation.
Като се има предвид, че тепърва предстои Съдът да дава тълкувание на понятието "специфична институционална структура" по смисъла на член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора, комисията по правни въпроси е счела, че основното споразумение изисква одобрението на Парламента съгласно член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора на основание, че споразумението установява "специфична институционална структура" (предвидените съвместни/смесени комитети предполагат създаване на организационна структура с правомощия за вземане на решения, които са задължителни за изпълнение от договарящите страни, по-конкретно по отношение на запазването на споразумението и решаването на спорове).
Whereas the Court of Justice has yet to interpret the concept of a "specific institutional framework" within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 300(3), the Legal Affairs Committee has held that the main Agreement required the assent of Parliament under the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) on the ground that at clearly established a "specific institutional framework" (the Joint/Mixed Committees provided for entail the creation of an organisational structure with a discretion to take decisions binding on the contracting parties, in particular with regard to the maintenance of the Agreement and dispute resolution).
Освен това се отбелязва, че по правило протоколите се сключват на същата правна основа, на която е сключено основното споразумение.
It is further observed that protocols are generally concluded on the same legal basis as the main agreement.
Накрая, при сключване на протокола официално ще се измени самата институционална структура, тъй като съставът на съвместните/смесените комитети ще се разшири с включването на нови членове, представляващи Лихтенщайн.
Lastly, when the Protocol is concluded, the institutional framework will itself be formally modified, because the Joint/Mixed Committees will be extended through the inclusion of new Members - representing Liechtenstein.
В този смисъл, комисията по правни въпроси счита, че предложенията за решения на Съвета са насочени към изменение на предвидената в основното споразумение " специфична институционална структура " и следователно следва да се
To that extent, it is considered that the proposals for Council decisions set out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, and that hence reference should be made to the second subparagraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty.
Въз основа на предходното, комисията по правни въпроси счита, че предложенията за решения на Съвета са насочени към изменение на " специфичната институционална структура ", предвидена в основното споразумение, от което предлаганият протокол е неразделна част.
In light of the foregoing, it is considered that the proposals for Council Decisions set out to modify the " specific institutional framework " provided for in the main Agreement, of which the proposed Protocol forms an integral part.
Съответно, на заседанието си на 11 юни 2007 г., комисията по правни въпроси единодушно
At its meeting of 11 June 2007 the Committee on Legal Affairs accordingly decided, unanimously
На окончателното гласуване присъстваха следните членове: Cristian Dumitrescu (и.д. председател), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (заместник-председател), Manuel Medina Ortega (докладчик по становище), Carlo Casini, Janelly Fourtou, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina и Tadeusz Zwiefka. реши да препоръча промяна на правната основа чрез позоваване на член 300, параграф 3, алинея втора от Договора за ЕО, според която се изисква одобрение от Парламента, а не обикновено допитване до същия.
The following were present for the final vote: Cristian Dumitrescu (acting chairman), Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg (vice-chairwoman), Manuel Medina Ortega (draftsman), Carlo Casini, Janelly Fourtou, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Kurt Lechner, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Hans-Peter Mayer, Michel Rocard, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Diana Wallis, Jaroslav Zvěřina and Tadeusz Zwiefka. , to recommend that the legal basis should be changed so as to refer to the second paragraph of Article 300(3) of the EC Treaty, which requires the assent and not merely consultation of Parliament.
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Philip Bradbourn, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Martine Roure, Csaba Sógor, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Philip Bradbourn, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Gérard Deprez, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Martine Roure, Csaba Sógor, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Genowefa Grabowska, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Syed Kamall, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Marianne Mikko, Bill Newton Dunn, Nicolae Vlad Popa
Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Genowefa Grabowska, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Syed Kamall, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Marianne Mikko, Bill Newton Dunn, Nicolae Vlad Popa
относно предложението за решение на Съвета относно сключването на протокол между Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн относно присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно критериите и механизмите за определяне на държавата, която е компетентна за разглеждането на молба за убежище, подадена в държава-членка или в Швейцария
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland
PE 404.818v02-00
PE 404.818v02-00
относно предложението за решение на Съвета относно сключването на протокол между Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн относно присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно критериите и механизмите за определяне на държавата, която е компетентна за разглеждането на молба за убежище, подадена в държава-членка или в Швейцария
on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanims for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2006)0754 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0754 ),
– като взе предвид протокола между Европейската общност, Конфедерация Швейцария и Княжество Лихтенщайн относно присъединяването на Княжество Лихтенщайн към Споразумението между Европейската общност и Конфедерация Швейцария относно критериите и механизмите за определяне на държавата, която е компетентна за разглеждането на молба за убежище, подадена в държава-членка или в Швейцария,
– having regard to the protocol between the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation concerning the criteria and mechanisms for establishing the State responsible for examining a request for asylum lodged in a Member State or in Switzerland,
– като взе предвид член 63, параграф 1, буква а) и член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 63(1)(a) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty,