natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Присъстваха следните членове на ЕП: Giuseppe Gargani (председател), Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacques Toubon, Costas Botopoulos комисията по правни въпроси препоръчва ръководената от Вас комисия, в качеството си на водеща комисия, да пристъпи към разглеждане на горното предложение в съответствие с препоръките й и член 80а.
The following Members were present: Giuseppe Gargani (Chairman), Bert Doorn, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Hartmut Nassauer, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Katalin Lévai, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Manuel Medina Ortega, Aloyzas Sakalas, Diana Wallis, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Jacques Toubon, Costas Botopoulos. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in keeping with its suggestions and in accordance with Rule 80a.
НА ВНИМАНИЕТО НА
FOR THE ATTENTION OF
ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ ПАРЛАМЕНТ,
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
Предложение за Регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за създаване на Европейска фондация за обучение (преработен)
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Training Foundation (recast)
COM(2007)0443 окончателен от 25.7.2007 г. - 2007/0163(COD)
COM(2007) 443 final of 25.7.2007 - 2007/0163 (COD
Като взе предвид Междуинституционалното споразумение от 28 ноември 2001 г. относно по-структурирано използване на техниката за преработване на нормативни актове, консултативна работна група, състояща се от съответните правни служби на Европейския парламент, на Съвета и на Комисията се събра на 13 септември 2007 г., за да разгледа гореспоменатото предложение, внесено от Комисията.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party, consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, met on 13 September 2007 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
На заседанието
At that meeting
Консултативната работна група разполагаше с всички езикови версии на предложението с изключение на български и румънски превод и работи въз основа на английския текст, който е основната езикова версия на текста за обсъждане. , при разглеждането на предложението за регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за преработване на Регламент (ЕИО) № 1360/90 на Съвета от 7 май 1990 година за създаване на Европейска фондация за обучение консултативната работна група с общо съгласие реши, че следните части от текста на преработеното предложение следва да се посочват със сиво маркиране, което се използва за отбелязване на съществени промени:
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal all language versions of the proposal except those in Bulgarian and in Romanian and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Council Regulation (EEC) No 1360/90 of 7 May 1990 establishing a European Training Foundation resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, that the following parts of text of the recast proposal should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type used for marking substantive changes:
- в новото заглавие на член 4 (" Прозрачност ");
- the new title of Article 4 (" Transparency ");
- в член 7, параграф 3 думата " три " (която вече е двойно зачеркната);
- in Article 7(3), the word " three " (having been already marked with double-strikethrough);
- в член 8, параграф 3 думата " обикновено " (която вече е двойно зачеркната);
- in Article 8(3), the word " simple " (already marked with double-strikethrough);
- в член 15, параграф 4 думите " правоимащи " (която вече е двойно зачеркната) и " партньори " (поставена между стрелки);
- in Article 15(4), the words " eligible " (already marked with double-strikethrough) and " partner " (having been presented between adaptation arrows);
- в член 24, параграф 2, двете места, където се появява думата " оценка ".
- in Article 24(2), the two occurrences of the word " evaluation ".
В резултат на това, разглеждането на предложението позволи на консултативната работна група за направи заключението, без разногласия, че предложението не съдържа никакви съществени изменения различни от вече съществуващите в него или в настоящото становище.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such therein or in the present opinion.
По отношение на кодифицирането на непроменените разпоредби на предишния акт с тези съществени изменения, работната група заключи също така, че предложението съдържа недвусмислена кодификация на съществуващите текстове, без никаква промяна на тяхното съдържание.
The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
Юристконсулт Юристконсулт Генерален директор
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director General
Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Proinsias De Rossa, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Jiří Maštálka, Elisabeth Morin, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Rovana Plumb, Jacek Protasiewicz, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker
Jan Andersson, Edit Bauer, Iles Braghetto, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Cabrnoch, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Luigi Cocilovo, Proinsias De Rossa, Harlem Désir, Harald Ettl, Richard Falbr, Carlo Fatuzzo, Ilda Figueiredo, Stephen Hughes, Karin Jöns, Ona Juknevičienė, Raymond Langendries, Bernard Lehideux, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Jiří Maštálka, Elisabeth Morin, Csaba Őry, Marie Panayotopoulos-Cassiotou, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Rovana Plumb, Jacek Protasiewicz, Bilyana Ilieva Raeva, Elisabeth Schroedter, Jean Spautz, Gabriele Stauner, Ewa Tomaszewska, Anne Van Lancker
(Опростена процедура – член 43, параграф 1 от Правилника за дейността на Европейския парламент)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
PE 400.561v01-00
PE 400.561v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2007)0680 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0680 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 150, параграф 4от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0398/2007 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 150(4) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0398/2007 ),
– като взе предвид член 51 и член 43, параграф 1от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rules 51 and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по заетост и социални въпроси ( A6‑0132/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6‑0132/2008 ),
Council Decision 85/368/EEC of 16 July 1985 on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between the Member States of the European Community
Council Decision 85/368/EEC of 16 July 1985 on the comparability of vocational training qualifications between the Member States of the European Community
OJ L 199, 31.7.1985, p.
OJ L 199, 31.7.1985, p.
56 called for the Commission and Member States to cooperate in drawing up job descriptions in specified occupations, and then match vocational training qualifications (VET) recognised in the Member States with the agreed job descriptions.
56 called for the Commission and Member States to cooperate in drawing up job descriptions in specified occupations, and then match vocational training qualifications (VET) recognised in the Member States with the agreed job descriptions.
The mutually agreed job descriptions were to be published in the Official Journal of the European Community.
The mutually agreed job descriptions were to be published in the Official Journal of the European Community.
The Decision also required Member States to designate a coordination body responsible for ensuring, in close cooperation with the social partners and the occupational sectors concerned, the dissemination of information on comparable vocational qualifications and to submit to the Commission a national report every four years on the implementation of the Decision and the results obtained.
The Decision also required Member States to designate a coordination body responsible for ensuring, in close cooperation with the social partners and the occupational sectors concerned, the dissemination of information on comparable vocational qualifications and to submit to the Commission a national report every four years on the implementation of the Decision and the results obtained.
The aim of the Decision was to enable workers to make better use of their qualifications to obtain suitable employment in other Member States.
The aim of the Decision was to enable workers to make better use of their qualifications to obtain suitable employment in other Member States.
Non-implementation of the Decision 85/368/EEC
Non-implementation of the Decision 85/368/EEC
In the present proposal, the Commission points out that, at first stage, 219 VET qualifications were designated, in cooperation with the Member States, in 19 sectors reflecting occupations in which workers' mobility was considered to be the most important.
In the present proposal, the Commission points out that, at first stage, 219 VET qualifications were designated, in cooperation with the Member States, in 19 sectors reflecting occupations in which workers' mobility was considered to be the most important.
Procedures for defining job descriptions and comparing qualifications were also established with the involvement of Cedefop.
Procedures for defining job descriptions and comparing qualifications were also established with the involvement of Cedefop.
However, a report prepared for the Commission in 1990 highlighted the difficulties in this process and acknowledged the slow pace of progress, as, by 1990, data on the comparability of qualifications had been published for only 5 of the 19 specified sectors, covering 66 occupations.
However, a report prepared for the Commission in 1990 highlighted the difficulties in this process and acknowledged the slow pace of progress, as, by 1990, data on the comparability of qualifications had been published for only 5 of the 19 specified sectors, covering 66 occupations.
This report proposed to accelerate the pace, setting targets to agree job descriptions in 14 more sectors before the end of 1992.
This report proposed to accelerate the pace, setting targets to agree job descriptions in 14 more sectors before the end of 1992.
But, in practice, these targets were not achieved.
But, in practice, these targets were not achieved.
The Decision also proved too inflexible to adapt to changing needs.
The Decision also proved too inflexible to adapt to changing needs.
Although, it referred to the need to adapt to new situations brought about by the impact of technological change on employment and job content, the Commission, Cedefop and the Member States came to accept that the centralised approach chosen, and the constant and rapid evolution of qualifications, soon made the published information out of date.
Although, it referred to the need to adapt to new situations brought about by the impact of technological change on employment and job content, the Commission, Cedefop and the Member States came to accept that the centralised approach chosen, and the constant and rapid evolution of qualifications, soon made the published information out of date.
Therefore, the work carried out at the European level had little impact at the level of national and sectoral stakeholders and the implementation of the Decision was abandoned.
Therefore, the work carried out at the European level had little impact at the level of national and sectoral stakeholders and the implementation of the Decision was abandoned.
Context of the Commission proposal
Context of the Commission proposal
The present proposal provides for the repeal of Decision 85/368/EEC, as a redundant piece of legislation.
The present proposal provides for the repeal of Decision 85/368/EEC, as a redundant piece of legislation.
The Commission considers that implementation of the Decision has not been effective in achieving the comparability of vocational qualifications for the benefit of workers seeking employment in another Member State.
The Commission considers that implementation of the Decision has not been effective in achieving the comparability of vocational qualifications for the benefit of workers seeking employment in another Member State.
It further considers that the methods and approach used to describe and compare qualifications provided for in the Decision differ from those currently applied in education and training systems.
It further considers that the methods and approach used to describe and compare qualifications provided for in the Decision differ from those currently applied in education and training systems.
The Commission proposal forms part of the simplification programme within the Commission Legislative and Work Programme for 2007, which aims to simplify the regulatory environment for business and other stakeholders and remove obsolete and unused legislation.
The Commission proposal forms part of the simplification programme within the Commission Legislative and Work Programme for 2007, which aims to simplify the regulatory environment for business and other stakeholders and remove obsolete and unused legislation.
Moreover, the Commission believes that Decision 84/368/EEC is superseded by other, more recent and efficient instruments and measures taken at European level which increase transparency, support transfer of qualifications and facilitate the valuing of learning outcomes, such as, in particular, the European Qualifications Framework.
Moreover, the Commission believes that Decision 84/368/EEC is superseded by other, more recent and efficient instruments and measures taken at European level which increase transparency, support transfer of qualifications and facilitate the valuing of learning outcomes, such as, in particular, the European Qualifications Framework.
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and other Community instruments
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and other Community instruments
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) should address the limitations of Decision 85/368/EEC, by focusing on improving the transparency of qualifications and by introducing a decentralised approach for co-operation which reflects the increasing complexity of qualifications in Europe.
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF) should address the limitations of Decision 85/368/EEC, by focusing on improving the transparency of qualifications and by introducing a decentralised approach for co-operation which reflects the increasing complexity of qualifications in Europe.
The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council which was adopted on 14 February 2008
The Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council which was adopted on 14 February 2008
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, not yet published in the Official Journal , establishes the EQF as a reference tool for the comparison of qualification levels in national qualifications systems, as well as qualifications systems developed by international sectoral organisations.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, not yet published in the Official Journal , establishes the EQF as a reference tool for the comparison of qualification levels in national qualifications systems, as well as qualifications systems developed by international sectoral organisations.
The EQF's main components are a set of European reference levels described in terms of learning outcomes, and mechanisms for voluntary co-operation.
The EQF's main components are a set of European reference levels described in terms of learning outcomes, and mechanisms for voluntary co-operation.
It is recommended that Member States relate their qualifications systems to the EQF by linking qualification levels to the corresponding EQF levels and, where appropriate, develop a national qualifications framework.
It is recommended that Member States relate their qualifications systems to the EQF by linking qualification levels to the corresponding EQF levels and, where appropriate, develop a national qualifications framework.
Member States are further recommended to ensure that, by 2012, all qualification certificates, diplomas and "Europass" documents bear the appropriate EQF level.
Member States are further recommended to ensure that, by 2012, all qualification certificates, diplomas and "Europass" documents bear the appropriate EQF level.
In addition, the setting-up of a EQF advisory group, composed of representatives of Member States and involving the European social partners and other stakeholders, is an important element promoting common approaches and ensuring the quality of the process.
In addition, the setting-up of a EQF advisory group, composed of representatives of Member States and involving the European social partners and other stakeholders, is an important element promoting common approaches and ensuring the quality of the process.
The EQF differs from Decision 85/368/EEC in scope.
The EQF differs from Decision 85/368/EEC in scope.
As an instrument for the promotion of lifelong learning, it covers, at all levels, general and adult education, higher education, as well as vocational education and training (VET) – which was the sole focus of the Decision.
As an instrument for the promotion of lifelong learning, it covers, at all levels, general and adult education, higher education, as well as vocational education and training (VET) – which was the sole focus of the Decision.
The EQF also differs from Decision 85/368/EEC in the approach taken.
The EQF also differs from Decision 85/368/EEC in the approach taken.
The Decision requires intensive co-operation between experts from different Member States to constantly update the list, amend descriptions of occupations and qualifications and add new qualifications as necessary.
The Decision requires intensive co-operation between experts from different Member States to constantly update the list, amend descriptions of occupations and qualifications and add new qualifications as necessary.
The fact that only a limited number of occupations and vocational qualifications were covered reflects the ineffectiveness of the Decision.
The fact that only a limited number of occupations and vocational qualifications were covered reflects the ineffectiveness of the Decision.
The EQF adopts a voluntary and decentralised approach where the Community provides a common reference framework, while detailed decisions are left to competent bodies at national and sectoral level.
The EQF adopts a voluntary and decentralised approach where the Community provides a common reference framework, while detailed decisions are left to competent bodies at national and sectoral level.
Consequently, Member States may relate their qualification levels to the EQF levels, so that any qualification falling within a particular level in their national system can be given an EQF level rating.
Consequently, Member States may relate their qualification levels to the EQF levels, so that any qualification falling within a particular level in their national system can be given an EQF level rating.
Therefore, the EQF is designed to provide a common language to describe and understand qualifications, and thus contribute to increasing the employability and mobility of workers and learners.
Therefore, the EQF is designed to provide a common language to describe and understand qualifications, and thus contribute to increasing the employability and mobility of workers and learners.
Finally, the development of the EQF has been given broad support through a Europe-wide consultation process, involving the European social partners, sector and branch organisations, educational institutions and associations, as well as NGOs.
Finally, the development of the EQF has been given broad support through a Europe-wide consultation process, involving the European social partners, sector and branch organisations, educational institutions and associations, as well as NGOs.
A range of international experts with experiences in the field of qualifications and qualifications frameworks contributed also to its formulation.
A range of international experts with experiences in the field of qualifications and qualifications frameworks contributed also to its formulation.
Although the EQF should be the instrument which most closely pursues the aims and functions that Decision 85/386/EEC could not fulfil, there are several other instruments and measures at European level which increase transparency and facilitate the transfer of qualifications.
Although the EQF should be the instrument which most closely pursues the aims and functions that Decision 85/386/EEC could not fulfil, there are several other instruments and measures at European level which increase transparency and facilitate the transfer of qualifications.
These include Europass, the European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS), the 2004 Council Conclusions on the identification and validation of non-formal and informal learning and the Ploteus portal.
These include Europass, the European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS), the 2004 Council Conclusions on the identification and validation of non-formal and informal learning and the Ploteus portal.
Decision 2241/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass) introduces a set of European instruments to be used by individuals to describe their qualifications and competences.
Decision 2241/2004/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on a single Community framework for the transparency of qualifications and competences (Europass) introduces a set of European instruments to be used by individuals to describe their qualifications and competences.
Europass is designed to promote occupational mobility and mobility for learning purposes.
Europass is designed to promote occupational mobility and mobility for learning purposes.
The existing European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS) has played an important role in facilitating student mobility and international curriculum development.
The existing European Credit Transfer System for higher education (ECTS) has played an important role in facilitating student mobility and international curriculum development.