natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Moreover, the language used in Article 4a of the Finnish compromise underlines the autonomy of Member States, while the final text can be read as a first step towards Community rules.
Moreover, the language used in Article 4a of the Finnish compromise underlines the autonomy of Member States, while the final text can be read as a first step towards Community rules.
The final text is also more detailed.
The final text is also more detailed.
As to the provisions on security charges (that they are directly related to the costs of providing security measures and designed to recover no more than the relevant costs involved) the expression "should" is used in recital 18a and Article 4a of the Finnish compromise.
As to the provisions on security charges (that they are directly related to the costs of providing security measures and designed to recover no more than the relevant costs involved) the expression "should" is used in recital 18a and Article 4a of the Finnish compromise.
In Article 5 of the final text the word "shall" is used.
In Article 5 of the final text the word "shall" is used.
As for the next steps, in recital 18a of the Finnish compromise the Commission "is invited to consider an initiative on the financing of security measures at European airports, and the transparency of security costs, in order to address possible distortion of competition in this field".
As for the next steps, in recital 18a of the Finnish compromise the Commission "is invited to consider an initiative on the financing of security measures at European airports, and the transparency of security costs, in order to address possible distortion of competition in this field".
The final text includes a date ("no later than 31 December 2008") for the report foreseen as the next step and sets out in a much more detailed way what is expected.
The final text includes a date ("no later than 31 December 2008") for the report foreseen as the next step and sets out in a much more detailed way what is expected.
The provisions are not limited to the objective of addressing "possible distortion of competition", but include also the sharing of costs between taxpayers and users.
The provisions are not limited to the objective of addressing "possible distortion of competition", but include also the sharing of costs between taxpayers and users.
In the Finnish compromise, the Commission undertook "in the coming months" to present "a proposal on infrastructure charging at the European airports, including a proposal on transparency of the financing of the security measures".
In the Finnish compromise, the Commission undertook "in the coming months" to present "a proposal on infrastructure charging at the European airports, including a proposal on transparency of the financing of the security measures".
It continued: "On the basis of such legislation the Commission will also further develop a more general approach to the financing of security measures at the European airports."
It continued: "On the basis of such legislation the Commission will also further develop a more general approach to the financing of security measures at the European airports."
The proposal mentioned became the proposal on airport charges (COM(2006)820) which was made on 24 January 2007, despite the failure of the civil aviation security negotiations at that stage.
The proposal mentioned became the proposal on airport charges (COM(2006)820) which was made on 24 January 2007, despite the failure of the civil aviation security negotiations at that stage.
The final outcome goes further, in the sense that Vice-President Barrot declared his intention to submit a legislative proposal to the College of Commissioners on the distribution of costs for more stringent measures.
The final outcome goes further, in the sense that Vice-President Barrot declared his intention to submit a legislative proposal to the College of Commissioners on the distribution of costs for more stringent measures.
V.2 Comitology
V.2 Comitology
At second reading, the Parliament's concerns about the delegated implementing power were expressed in mainly two amendments: one requiring detailed risk, cost and impact assessments for each implementing measure (AM 36) and one providing for a sunset-clause for all implementing measures (measures would expire after six months but could be upheld after a thorough re-evaluation of security risks, costs and operational impact) (AM 33).
At second reading, the Parliament's concerns about the delegated implementing power were expressed in mainly two amendments: one requiring detailed risk, cost and impact assessments for each implementing measure (AM 36) and one providing for a sunset-clause for all implementing measures (measures would expire after six months but could be upheld after a thorough re-evaluation of security risks, costs and operational impact) (AM 33).
The Finnish compromise provided for the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in two cases (the criteria allowing Member States to derogate from the common basic standards and the specifications for the national quality control programme).
The Finnish compromise provided for the regulatory procedure with scrutiny in two cases (the criteria allowing Member States to derogate from the common basic standards and the specifications for the national quality control programme).
Building on Parliament's amendments mentioned above, the final text in addition now provides for the scrutiny procedure for the list of measures contained in Article 4(2), i.e. for the common basic standards.
Building on Parliament's amendments mentioned above, the final text in addition now provides for the scrutiny procedure for the list of measures contained in Article 4(2), i.e. for the common basic standards.
The common basic standards can in a way be considered to be at the heart of the Regulation: the fact that, despite strong resistance, the Council and the Commission eventually accepted Parliament's arguments for the new comitology rules, should be regarded as a considerable success.
The common basic standards can in a way be considered to be at the heart of the Regulation: the fact that, despite strong resistance, the Council and the Commission eventually accepted Parliament's arguments for the new comitology rules, should be regarded as a considerable success.
This will allow for the Parliament's close involvement in such issues as liquids on board an aircraft
This will allow for the Parliament's close involvement in such issues as liquids on board an aircraft
See European Parliament resolution of 5 September 2007 on Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 622/2003 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (introduction of liquids onto aircraft). in the future.
See European Parliament resolution of 5 September 2007 on Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 622/2003 laying down measures for the implementation of the common basic standards on aviation security (introduction of liquids onto aircraft). in the future.
In acknowledgement of the need to make quick decisions in certain circumstances, Parliament's delegation accepted the possibility to use the urgency procedures for future measures under the scrutiny procedure.
In acknowledgement of the need to make quick decisions in certain circumstances, Parliament's delegation accepted the possibility to use the urgency procedures for future measures under the scrutiny procedure.
V.3 Other issues
V.3 Other issues
All the other issues summarised above under IV.3 were not part of the Finnish compromise and constitute clear improvements from the Parliament's view.
All the other issues summarised above under IV.3 were not part of the Finnish compromise and constitute clear improvements from the Parliament's view.
As the agreement reached goes much further than what was possible at earlier stages of the procedure, the delegation recommends that the Parliament approves the joint text at third reading.
As the agreement reached goes much further than what was possible at earlier stages of the procedure, the delegation recommends that the Parliament approves the joint text at third reading.
Съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за общите правила в областта на сигурността на гражданското въздухоплаване и за отмяна на Регламент (ЕО) № 2320/2002
Joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002
PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD)
PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD)
Председател на делегацията: заместник-председател
Delegation chair(wo)man: Vice-President
TRANPaolo Costa
TRANPaolo Costa
Дата на първото четене в ЕП - Номер P
Date of Parliament’s first reading – P number
Изменено предложение на Комисията
Amended Commission proposal
Дата на второто четене в ЕП - Номер P
Date of Parliament’s second reading – P number
Дата на писмото на Съвета относно неодобрението на измененията, внесени от ЕП
Date of Council letter on non-approval of Parliament amendments
Присъствали членове
Members present
Inés Ayala Sender, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Arūnas Degutis, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Georg Jarzembowski, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Hartmut Nassauer, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Inés Ayala Sender, Philip Bradbourn, Paolo Costa, Arūnas Degutis, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Georg Jarzembowski, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Hartmut Nassauer, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Споразумение чрез размяна на писма
Agreement by exchange of letters
Срок за свикване на комисията
Deadline for convening the Committee
Институция, поискала удължаването - дата
Requesting institution – date
Срок за работа в комисия
Deadline for work in the Committee
PE 396.738v03-00
PE 396.738v03-00
ИЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НА МОТИВИТЕ.............................................................................................30
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................26
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика 34
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............30
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2006)0569 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0569 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 71, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които Комисията е представила предложението пред Парламента ( C6‑0331/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0331/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по транспорт и туризъм и становището на комисията по промишленост, изследвания и енергетика ( A6‑0050/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6‑0050/2008 ),
(3а) П рез последните години беше постигнат голям напредък по отношение на проектирането на превозните средства ( мерки за сигурност и разработване и прилагане на нови технологии ), което помогна за намаляване на броя на убитите или ранените при пътнотранспортни произшествия.
(3a) In recent years, major advances have been made in vehicle design (safety measures and the development and application of new technologies) which have helped to reduce the number of people killed or injured in road accidents.
За да бъде постигната определената за 2010 г. цел, трябва да се предприемат действия и в други области.
If the target set for 2010 is to be achieved, action must be taken in other areas too.
Управлението на безопасността на пътните инфраструктури предлага значителни възможности за подобрение, които трябва напълно да се използват.
Managing the safety of road infrastructure offers plenty of scope for improvement, which must be used to advantage .
(4) Установяването на подходящи процедури е важен инструмент за повишаване на безопасността на пътната инфраструктура в рамките на трансевропейската пътна мрежа.
(4) The setting up of appropriate procedures is an essential tool for improving the safety of road infrastructure within the Trans-European road network.
Оценките за въздействие върху пътната безопасност следва да демонстрират на стратегическо равнище последиците за пътната безопасност на различни алтернативи за планиране на инфраструктурен проект.
Road safety impact assessments should demonstrate, on a strategic level, the implications on road safety of different planning alternatives of an infrastructure project.
Освен това, проверките за пътна безопасност следва подробно да установят опасните характеристики на определен пътен инфраструктурен проект.
Moreover, road safety audits should identify, in a detailed way, unsafe features of a road infrastructure project.
Поради това е целесъобразно да се установят процедури, които да се следват в тези две области с цел повишаване на безопасността на пътните инфраструктури в трансевропейската пътна мрежа, като същевременно се изключат пътните тунели, които се уреждат с Директива 2004/54/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 29 април 2004 г. относно минималните изисквания за безопасност за тунелите на трансевропейската пътна мрежа.
It is therefore appropriate to establish procedures to be followed in those two fields with an aim of increasing safety of road infrastructures on the trans-European road network, whilst at the same time excluding road tunnels which are covered by Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network
Резултатите от оценката на въздействието върху безопасността могат да бъдат изложени в редица документи.
The results of the road safety impact assessment may be set out in a number of documents.
Поради това има смисъл да се разработят процедури, които да се следват в тези две области с цел повишаване на безопасността на пътните инфраструктури в трансевропейската пътна мрежа, като същевременно се изключат пътните тунели, които се уреждат с Директива 2004/54/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 29 април 2004 г. относно минималните изисквания за безопасност за тунелите на трансевропейската пътна мрежа.
It therefore makes sense to develop procedures to be followed in those two fields with an aim of increasing safety of road infrastructures on the trans-European road network, whilst at the same time excluding road tunnels which are covered by Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network
Поради това е целесъобразно да се установят процедури, които да се следват в тези две области с цел повишаване на безопасността на пътните инфраструктури в трансевропейската пътна мрежа, като същевременно се изключат пътните тунели, които се уреждат с Директива 2004/54/ЕО на Европейския парламент и на Съвета от 29 април 2004 г. относно минималните изисквания за безопасност за тунелите на трансевропейската пътна мрежа.
It is therefore appropriate to establish procedures to be followed in those two fields with an aim of increasing safety of road infrastructures on the trans-European road network, whilst at the same time excluding road tunnels which are covered by Directive 2004/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on minimum safety requirements for tunnels in the Trans-European Road Network.
Оценките за въздействие върху пътната безопасност следва да демонстрират на стратегическо равнище последиците за пътната безопасност на различни алтернативи за планиране на инфраструктурен проект и следва да имат решаващо значение при избора на маршрути .
Road safety impact assessments should demonstrate, on a strategic level, the implications on road safety of different planning alternatives of an infrastructure project and they should play a decisive role when routes are being selected .
It must be made clear in the text of the Directive that road-safety impact assessments are not simply carried out but are properly taken into account when routes are being selected.
It must be made clear in the text of the Directive that road-safety impact assessments are not simply carried out but are properly taken into account when routes are being selected.
(4 а) Редица държави-членки вече разполагат с добре функциониращи системи за управление на безопасността на пътните инфраструктури.
(4a) Several Member States already possess well functioning road infrastructure safety management systems.
На тези страни следва да бъде разрешено да продължат да използват настоящите си методи.
These countries should be permitted to continue using their existing methods.
(4а) Научн ите изследван ия са от първостепенно значение за подобряване на безопасността на пътищата в Европа.
(4a) Research is vital to improving safety on European roads.
Р азработването и демонстрацията на елементи, мерки и методи (включително телематични) и разпространението на резултатите от научните изследвания играят в ажна роля в повишаването на безопасността на пътната инфраструктура.
Developing and demonstrating components, measures and methods (including telematics) and disseminating research results play an important part in increasing the safety of road infrastructure.
In its Resolution on the Road Safety Action Programme Mid-term Review of 18 January 2007, the European Parliament called for intensive research and cooperation between all stakeholders
In its Resolution on the Road Safety Action Programme Mid-term Review of 18 January 2007, the European Parliament called for intensive research and cooperation between all stakeholders.
(5) Следва да се повиши безопасността на съществуващите пътища чрез целенасочени инвестиции в пътни участъци с най-висока честота на произшествия или с най-висок потенциал за намаляване на произшествията.
(5) Safety performance of existing roads should be raised by targeting investments to the road sections with the highest accident density or the highest accident reduction potential.
За да могат да приспособят поведението си и в по-голяма степен да спазват правилника за движение по пътищата, по-конкретно ограниченията на скоростта, водачите на МПС следва да са информирани преди да навлязат в пътен участък с висока степен на опасност.
To be able to adapt their behaviour and increase compliance to traffic rules, in particular speed limits, drivers should be made aware before entering a high risk road section .
(5) Следва да се повиши безопасността на съществуващите пътища чрез целенасочени инвестиции в пътни участъци както с най-висока честота на произшествия, така и с най-висок потенциал за намаляване на произшествията.
(5) Safety performance of existing roads should be raised by targeting investments to the road sections with both the highest accident density and the highest accident reduction potential.
За да могат да приспособят поведението си и в по-голяма степен да спазват правилника за движение по пътищата, по-конкретно ограниченията на скоростта, водачите на МПС следва да са информирани за наличие на пътн и участъ ци с висока честота на произшествия.
To be able to adapt their behaviour and increase compliance to traffic rules, in particular speed limits, drivers should be made aware of road sections with a high accident density .
(6) Управлението на безопасността на мрежата има висок потенциал в периода непосредствено след прилагането му.
(6) Network safety management has a high potential immediately after its implementation.
След обработката на пътните участъци с висока степен на опасност и след предприемането на мерки за отстраняване на недостатъците, инспекциите за безопасност, като предохранителна мярка, следва да придобият по-важна роля.
Once high risk road sections have been treated and remedial measures have been taken, safety inspections as a preventive measure should assume a more important role.
Редовните инспекции са важен инструмент за предотвратяване на възможни опасности за всички потребители на пътя, в. т.ч. уязвими потребители, и в случай на ремонтни работи по пътя.
Regular inspections are an essential tool for preventing possible dangers for all users of the road, including vulnerable users, also in case of roadworks.
След обработката на пътните участъци с висока честота на произшествия и след предприемането на мерки за отстраняване на недостатъците, инспекциите за безопасност, като предохранителна мярка, следва да придобият по-важна роля.
Once road sections with a high accident density have been treated and remedial measures have been taken, safety inspections as a preventive measure should assume a more important role.
( 7 а) С цел повишаване на безопасността на европейските пътища, които не са част от трансевропейската пътна мрежа, следва да бъдат взети мерки за по-чест и по-систематичен обмен на утвърдени практики сред държавите-членки.
(7a) With a view to improving safety on European roads which are not part of the trans-European road network, arrangements should be made for more frequent and more systematic exchanges of proven practices among the Member States.
The risk of accidents is particularly high on single-lane main roads.
The risk of accidents is particularly high on single-lane main roads.
On the basis of the subsidiarity principle, the Commission has no power to adopt legal measures in this area, but exchanges of proven practices would be both feasible and desirable.
On the basis of the subsidiarity principle, the Commission has no power to adopt legal measures in this area, but exchanges of proven practices would be both feasible and desirable.
(8) За да се гарантира висока степен на пътна безопасност, държавите-членки следва да прилагат насоки относно управлението на безопасността на инфраструктурата.
(8) In order to ensure a high level of road safety Member States should apply guidelines on infrastructure safety management.
Съобщаването на тези насоки на Комисията и редовното докладване относно прилагането им следва да проправят пътя към систематично повишаване на безопасността на инфраструктурата на общностно равнище и да предоставят основа за по-нататъшно развитие в посока към установяването на по-ефективна система с течение на времето.
The notification of those guidelines to the Commission and regular reporting on their implementation should pave the way for a systematic improvement of infrastructure safety at the Community level and provide a basis for the evolution towards a more effective system over time.
Освен това, докладването относно прилагането на насоките следва да позволи на други държави-членки да намерят най-ефективните решения, а систематичното събиране на данни за състоянието преди/след проучванията следва да предостави възможност за избор на най-ефективната мярка за бъдещи действия.
The reporting on their implementation should, furthermore, allow other Member States to identify the most effective solutions, while the systematic collection of data from before/after studies should allow selecting the most effective measure for future action.
(8) За да се гарантира висока степен на пътна безопасност на пътищата от трансевропейската пътна мрежа и автомагистралите , държавите-членки следва да прилагат насоки относно управлението на безопасността на инфраструктурата.
(8) In order to ensure a high level of road safety on the roads in the Trans-European transport network and on motorways Member States should apply guidelines on infrastructure safety management.
The scope of the directive should be extended to cover motorways.
The scope of the directive should be extended to cover motorways.