natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Член 8 – точка 2
Article 8 – point 2
2) информационно-технологичен инструмент, позволяващ на издаващия орган на държава-членка да установи кой в друга държава-членка е компетентният орган за получаване и изпълнение на молбата й за съдебно сътрудничество, включително европейските заповеди за арест, европейските заповеди за предаване на доказателства, заповеди за запориране на активи и молби за взаимопомощ;
2) an IT tool allowing the issuing authority of a Member State to identify the competent authority in another Member State to receive and execute its request for judicial cooperation, including European Arrest Warrants, European Evidence Warrants, orders for the freezing of assets and requests for mutual legal assistance;
2) информация, позволяваща на издаващия орган на държава-членка да установи кой в друга държава-членка е компетентният орган за получаване и изпълнение на молбата й за съдебно сътрудничество, включително европейските заповеди за арест, европейските заповеди за предаване на доказателства, заповеди за запориране на активи и молби за взаимопомощ , посредством информационно-технологичен инструмент ;
( 2) information allowing the issuing authority of a Member State to identify the competent authority in another Member State to receive and execute its request for judicial cooperation, including European Arrest Warrants, European Evidence Warrants, orders for the freezing of assets and requests for mutual legal assistance via an IT tool ;
Член 10 – параграф 1 – буква б
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
б) създава се защитена телекомуникационна мрежа за оперативната работа на точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа.
(b) a secure telecommunications network is set up for the operational work of the contact points of the European Judicial Network;
б) създават се защитени телекомуникационни връзки за оперативната работа на Европейската съдебна мрежа;
(b) secure telecommunications connections are set up for the operational work of the European Judicial Network ;
Since the data that is exchanged does not require the highest possible level of security it is sufficient to provide for secure telecommunication connections instead of an entire telecommunications network.
Since the data that is exchanged does not require the highest possible level of security it is sufficient to provide for secure telecommunication connections instead of an entire telecommunications network.
But it is essential that all judicial authorities are included, not only the contact points.
But it is essential that all judicial authorities are included, not only the contact points.
It has to be ensured that as well on this level secure telecommunication can be used since it is the same kind of data that is exchanged on this level.
It has to be ensured that as well on this level secure telecommunication can be used since it is the same kind of data that is exchanged on this level.
Член 10 – параграф 1 – буква в
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c
в) по защитената комуникационна мрежа се осъществява обменът на данни и изпращането на искания за съдебно сътрудничество между държавите-членки, както и между тях и националните членове, националните кореспонденти на Евроюст и на магистратите за връзка, назначени от Евроюст.
(c) the secure telecommunications network makes possible the flow of data and of all requests for judicial cooperation between Member States, as well as between them and the national members, national correspondents of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust;
в) по защитените комуникационни връзки се осъществява обменът на данни и изпращането на искания за съдебно сътрудничество между държавите-членки, както и между тях и националните членове, националните кореспонденти на Евроюст и на магистратите за връзка, назначени от Евроюст.
(c) the secure telecommunications connections make possible the flow of data and of all requests for judicial cooperation between Member States, as well as between them and the national members, national correspondents of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust;
2 ) Защитената комуникационна мрежа, посочена в параграф 1, може да бъде използвана и за оперативната работа на националните кореспонденти, националните кореспонденти по въпросите на тероризма, националните членове на Евроюст и магистратите за връзка, назначени от Евроюст.
2 ) The secure telecommunications network referred to in paragraph 1 may also be used for their operational work by the national correspondents, national correspondents for terrorist matters, the national members of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust.
Тя може да бъде свързана със системата на Евроюст за управление на случаите, посочена в член 16 от Решение 2002/187/ПВР.
It may be linked to the Case Management System of Eurojust referred to in Article 16 of Decision 2002/187/JHA.
Защитените комуникационни връзки, посочени в параграф 1, могат да бъдат използвани и за оперативната работа на националните кореспонденти, националните кореспонденти по въпросите на тероризма, националните членове на Евроюст и магистратите за връзка, назначени от Евроюст.
The secure telecommunications connections referred to in paragraph 1 may also be used for their operational work by the national correspondents, national correspondents for terrorist matters, the national members of Eurojust and liaison magistrates appointed by Eurojust.
Те могат да бъдат свързани със системата на Евроюст за управление на случаите, посочена в член 16 от Решение 2002/187/ПВР.
It may be linked to the Case Management System of Eurojust referred to in Article 16 of Decision 2002/187/JHA.
Използването на защитени телекомуникации не изключва директните контакти между точките за контакт или между компетентните органи на държавите-членки.
The u se of secure telecommunications does not preclude direct contacts between contact points or between the competent authoritie s of the Member States.
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква а
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a
а) Евроюст има достъп до централизирана информация от Европейската съдебна мрежа съгласно член 8 от настоящото решение и до защитената телекомуникационна мрежа, създадена с член 10 от настоящото решение.
(a) Eurojust shall have access to centralised information from the European Judicial Network in accordance with Article 8 of this Decision and to the secured telecommunication network set up under Article 10 of this Decision;
а) Евроюст има достъп до централизирана информация от Европейската съдебна мрежа съгласно член 8 от настоящото решение и до защитените телекомуникационни връзки, създадени с член 10 от настоящото решение.
(a) Eurojust shall have access to centralised information from the European Judicial Network in accordance with Article 8 of this Decision and to the secured telecommunication connections set up under Article 10 of this Decision;
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква б
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
б) без да се засяга член 13 от Решение 2002/187/ПВР и съгласно член 4, параграф 4 от настоящото решение, точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа информират Евроюст , за всеки случай поотделно, относно дела, които засягат две държави-членки и които влизат в сферата на компетентността на Евроюст:
(b) without prejudice to Article 13 of Decision 2002/187/JHA and in accordance with Article 4(4) of this Decision, the contact points of the European Judicial Network shall, on a case-by-case basis, inform Eurojust on cases involving two Member States and entering the field of competence of Eurojust:
б) наред със задължението за предаване на информация на Евроюст, предвидено в член 13 от Решение 2002/187/ПВР , точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа информират своя национален член на Евроюст за всеки случай поотделно, относно всички дела , за които се счита, че Евроюст е в състояние да се справи по-добре.
(b) in addition to the obligation to transmit information to Eurojust stipulated in Article 13 of Decision 2002/187/JHA , the contact points of the European Judicial Network shall, on a case-by-case basis, inform their national m ember of Eurojust o f all other cases with which Eurojust is deemed to be in a better position to deal.
– в случаи, когато има вероятност да възникнат спорове за компетентност
– in cases where conflicts of jurisdiction are likely to arise
– в случаи на отказ на искане за съдебно сътрудничество, включително европейски заповеди за арест, европейски заповеди за доказателства, заповеди за запориране на активи и молби за взаимопомощ.
– in cases of a refusal of a request for judicial cooperation, including European Arrest Warrants, European Evidence Warrants, orders for the freezing of assets and requests for mutual legal assistance.
It seems to be sufficient if Eurojust and the EJN inform each other when they are of the opinion that the other one would be in a better position to handle the case.
It seems to be sufficient if Eurojust and the EJN inform each other when they are of the opinion that the other one would be in a better position to handle the case.
Therefore there is no need to further determine specific situations in which the EJN should be obliged to inform Eurojust.
Therefore there is no need to further determine specific situations in which the EJN should be obliged to inform Eurojust.
It should be avoided that the procedure gets to complicated and cumbersome.
It should be avoided that the procedure gets to complicated and cumbersome.
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква в
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
в) Точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа също така информират Евроюст, за всеки случай поотделно, относно всички дела, които влизат в сферата на компетентност на Евроюст и засягат поне три държави-членки.
(c) The contact points of the European Judicial Network shall also inform Eurojust, on a case-by-case basis, on all cases entering the field of competence of Eurojust and involving at least three Member States;
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква е
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
е) Националните членове на Евроюст могат да участват в срещи на Европейската съдебна мрежа по нейна покана.
(f) the national members of Eurojust may attend meetings of the European Judicial Network at the latter’s invitation.
Точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа могат да бъдат канени да участват в срещи на Евроюст по конкретни случаи .
European Judicial Network contact points may be invited on a case-by-case basis to attend Eurojust meetings.
Точките за контакт на Европейската съдебна мрежа могат по същия начин да участват в срещи на Евроюст по негова покана.
Likewise European Judicial Network contact points may attend meetings of Eurojust at its invit a tion.
Член 11 а (нов)
Article 11 a (new)
Когато се извършва обмен на лични данни между компетентните органи или точките за контакт на държавите-членки, те гарантират, че:
When personal data are exchanged between the competent authorities or the co n tact points of the Member States , they shall ensure that :
– получаващият компетентен орган обработва данните само за целите, за които данните са предоставени;
– the receiving competent authority processes the data only for the purposes for which the data have been supplied ;
– се предприемат мерки, за да се осигури ефективна защита на личните данни от случайно или неразрешено унищожение, случайна загуба, неразрешен достъп, неразрешено или случайно изменение и неразрешено разкриване.
– steps are taken to ensure that personal data are effectively protected against acc i dental or unauthorised destruction , accidental loss , unauthorised access , unautho r ised or a c cidental alteration and unauthorised disclosure.
Специфични категории данни (лични данни, разкриващи расова или етническа принадлежност, политически възгледи, религиозни или философски убеждения, членство в партии или синдикални организации, сексуална ориентация или здраве, или данни, свързани с престъпления, присъди или мерки за сигурност) се обработват само в случаите, когато това е абсолютно необходимо за извършване на дейностите на Европейската съдебна мрежа.
Specific categories of data (personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, polit i cal opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, party or trade union membe r ship, sexual orientation or health or data relating to offences, criminal convictions or s e curity measures) shall be processed only when it is strictly necessary for the pe r formance of the activities of the European Judicial Network.
В тези случаи се предприемат допълнителни защитни мерки като:
In that case, add i tional saf e guards shall be put in place, such as :
– предоставяне на достъп до съответните данни единствено на служители, които отговарят за изпълнението на законната задача, обосноваваща обработката;
– access to the data concerned only for personnel who is responsible for the performance of the legitimate task that justifies the processing ;
– сигурно криптиране за прехвърлянето;
– strong encryption for transmission ;
– запазване на данните единствено за периода от време, необходим на компетентните органи или точките за контакт за изпълнение на техните задачи.
– retention of the data for only as long as necessary for the competent author i ties and the contact points to perform their tasks.
The European Judicial Network facilitates direct contacts and exchange of data b etween the competent authorities of the Member States in the framework of judicial cooperation.
The European Judicial Network facilitates direct contacts and exchange of data b e tween the competent authorities of the Member States in the framework of judicial cooper a tion.
Therefore it has to be made sure that a certain level of data protection is o bserved and that additional safeguards are put in place when specific - sensitive - categories of data are exchanged, which often is the case when requesting legal assistance.
Therefore it has to be made sure that a certain level of data protection is o b served and that additional safeguards are put in place when specific - sensitive - cat e gories of data are exchanged , which often is the case when requesting legal assi s tance.
Since there is - up to now - no legal instrument on European Union level as regards the protection of personal data, it is necessary to have a data protection provision in this text.
Since there is - up to now - no legal instrument on European Union level as regards the protection of personal data , it is necessary to have a data protection provision in this text.
Информиране на Съвета и Европейската комисия
Informing the Council and the Commission
Административният директор на Евроюст и Председателството на Съвета докладват писмено на Съвета и на Комисията веднъж на две години относно дейностите и управлението на Европейската съдебна мрежа, включително нейното бюджетно управление.
The Administrative Director of Eurojust and the Presidency of the Council shall report to the Council and the Commission in writing every second year on the activities and management, including budgetary management, of the European Judicial Network.
За тази цел Председателството подготвя двугодишен доклад относно дейностите на Европейската съдебна мрежа и проблемите в областта на политиката по отношение на престъпността в рамките на Съюза, очертали се в резултат на дейностите на Европейската съдебна мрежа.
To that end, the Presidency shall prepare a bi-annual report on the activities of the European Judicial Network and on any criminal policy problems within the Union highlighted as a result of the European Judicial Network's activities.
В този доклад Европейската съдебна мрежа, чрез Председателството, може да прави и предложения за подобрението на съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси.
In that report, the European Judicial Network, through the Presidency, may also make proposals for the improvement of judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
Европейската съдебна мрежа също така може да изпраща всякакви други доклади или всякаква друга информация относно работата си, които могат да бъдат необходими за Съвета или Председателството.
The European Judicial Network may also submit any report or any other information on the operation of the European Judicial Network which may be required by the Council or the Presidency.
Partly moved to Article 15.
Partly moved to Article 15.
Член 15 – заглавие
Article 15 – Title
Оценяване на работата на Европейската съдебна мрежа
Assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network
Докладване на Европейския парламент, на Съвета и на Комисията и оценяване на работата на Европейската съдебна мрежа
Reporting to the European Parli a ment, the Council and the Commission and assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network
Европейската съдебна мрежа докладва писмено на Европейския парламент, на Съвета и на Комисията веднъж на две години относно своите дейности и управление, включително относно своето бюджетно управление.
The European Judicial Network shall report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in writing every second year on its activities and management, including its budgetary management.
В своя доклад Европейската съдебна мрежа може да посочва всякакви проблеми в областта на политиката по отношение на престъпността в Съюза, очертали се в резултат на дейностите на Европейската съдебна мрежа, както и да прави предложения за подобрение на съдебното сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси.
The European Judicial Network may in its report also indicate any criminal policy problems within the Union highlighted as a result of the European Judicial Network's activ i ties and may also make proposals for the improvement of judicial cooper a tion in criminal matters.
Европейската съдебна мрежа също така може да изпраща всякакви други доклади или да предоставя всякаква друга информация относно работата си, които могат да бъдат поискани от Съвета.
The European Judicial Network may also submit any report or provide any other i n formation on the operation of the European Judicial Network which may be requested by the Council.
На всеки четири години Съветът прави оценка на работата на Европейската съдебна мрежа въз основата на доклад, съставен от Комисията, в сътрудничество с Европейската съдебна мрежа.
The Council shall, every four years, carry out an assessment of the operation of the European Judicial Network on the basis of a report drawn up by the Commission, in cooperation with the European Judicial Network.
It makes more sense that the report on activities and management is drawn up by the European Judicial Network itself instead of the Administrative Director of Eurojust.
It makes more sense that the report on activities and management is drawn up by the European Judicial Network itself instead of the Administrative Director of Eurojust.
The Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
The Network itself is in the best position to identify problems and also to make proposals on improving judicial cooperation.
This report has also to be submitted to the European Parliament.
This report has also to be submitted to the European Parliament.
The European Judicial Network (the EJN) was established by Joint Action of 29 June 1998.
The European Judicial Network (the EJN) was established by Joint Action of 29 June 1998.
The EJN is a network of central authorities responsible for international judicial cooperation and the judicial or other competent authorities with specific responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation.
The EJN is a network of central authorities responsible for international judicial cooperation and the judicial or other competent authorities with specific responsibilities within the context of international judicial cooperation.
Every Member State nominates contact points that provide for legal and practical information and establish contacts between the judicial or other competent authorities of the Member States in order to facilitate judicial cooperation between the Member States.
Every Member State nominates contact points that provide for legal and practical information and establish contacts between the judicial or other competent authorities of the Member States in order to facilitate judicial cooperation between the Member States.
After nine years of existence, the EJN has proved a very useful system in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
After nine years of existence, the EJN has proved a very useful system in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
The efficiency and success of the EJN is based on its flexibility.
The efficiency and success of the EJN is based on its flexibility.
Therefore it was decided to maintain the network's flexibility in the proposal.
Therefore it was decided to maintain the network's flexibility in the proposal.
Since the network was established almost ten years ago the structure developed and thus it is necessary now to adapt the legislative act accordingly.
Since the network was established almost ten years ago the structure developed and thus it is necessary now to adapt the legislative act accordingly.
The proposal fully replaces the existing legal framework by a new instrument.
The proposal fully replaces the existing legal framework by a new instrument.
However, the general structure and content of the Joint Action is maintained in the proposal and many Articles are taken over unchanged.
However, the general structure and content of the Joint Action is maintained in the proposal and many Articles are taken over unchanged.
The proposal broadly reflects the current practice of the operation of the EJN.
The proposal broadly reflects the current practice of the operation of the EJN.
Main points of the proposal:
Main points of the proposal:
Creation of national correspondents of the EJN
Creation of national correspondents of the EJN
In order to ensure smooth internal functioning of national contact points, there is a need to appoint one contact point as national correspondent to coordinate EJN activities at national level.
In order to ensure smooth internal functioning of national contact points, there is a need to appoint one contact point as national correspondent to coordinate EJN activities at national level.
Clarification of the relationship to Eurojust
Clarification of the relationship to Eurojust
It is proposed to maintain both bodies - Eurojust and the EJN - as they have proven their essential role in judicial cooperation.
It is proposed to maintain both bodies - Eurojust and the EJN - as they have proven their essential role in judicial cooperation.
However, it is necessary to clarify their relationship which should be based on the principles of cooperation and complementarity.
However, it is necessary to clarify their relationship which should be based on the principles of cooperation and complementarity.
Thus the proposal stipulates reciprocal information obligations on the EJN (as well as Eurojust) view a view to cases handled by the EJN and Eurojust.
Thus the proposal stipulates reciprocal information obligations on the EJN (as well as Eurojust) view a view to cases handled by the EJN and Eurojust.
Creation of secure telecommunication network.
Creation of secure telecommunication network.
The proposal envisages the creation of a secure telecommunication network as judicial authorities need a secure telecommunication tool through which they could contact each other and send requests for legal assistance.
The proposal envisages the creation of a secure telecommunication network as judicial authorities need a secure telecommunication tool through which they could contact each other and send requests for legal assistance.
Emphasis on judicial training
Emphasis on judicial training
For efficient functioning of judicial system, it is crucial to ensure adequate level of judicial training.
For efficient functioning of judicial system, it is crucial to ensure adequate level of judicial training.
Therefore, the proposal contains a new paragraph which stresses the role of contact points in judicial training.
Therefore, the proposal contains a new paragraph which stresses the role of contact points in judicial training.
Position of the rapporteur:
Position of the rapporteur: