natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
One of the basic duties and responsibilities of the EU is to create safe and secure conditions of living for the Europeans.
One of the basic duties and responsibilities of the EU is to create safe and secure conditions of living for the Europeans.
This requires safety in the transport in the EU territory – including dangerous goods transport.
This requires safety in the transport in the EU territory – including dangerous goods transport.
Speeding-up turnover of goods and services requires faster and secure transport of dangerous goods.
Speeding-up turnover of goods and services requires faster and secure transport of dangerous goods.
Coverage rail, road and inland waterways transport of dangerous goods in one directive may facilitate multimodalism.
Coverage rail, road and inland waterways transport of dangerous goods in one directive may facilitate multimodalism.
These challenges were recognised globally and some specific Recommendations were adopted by the United Nations for different modes of transport (road-ADR, railway-RID and inland waterways-ADN).
These challenges were recognised globally and some specific Recommendations were adopted by the United Nations for different modes of transport (road-ADR, railway-RID and inland waterways-ADN).
Prevailing majority of the EU Member States are signatories to ADR and RID.
Prevailing majority of the EU Member States are signatories to ADR and RID.
ADN is expected to enter into force soon.
ADN is expected to enter into force soon.
At present four Directives regulate the transport of dangerous goods within the EU [94/55/EC (ADR); 96/49/EC (RID); plus 96/35/EC and 2000/18/EC regarding safety advisers].
At present four Directives regulate the transport of dangerous goods within the EU [94/55/EC (ADR); 96/49/EC (RID); plus 96/35/EC and 2000/18/EC regarding safety advisers].
Another four Commission Decisions grant national derogations from the framework directives (2005/263/EC, 2005/903/EC, 2005/180/EC and 2005/777/EC).
Another four Commission Decisions grant national derogations from the framework directives (2005/263/EC, 2005/903/EC, 2005/180/EC and 2005/777/EC).
The EU legislation governs only road and rail transport of dangerous goods – there are not yet EU rules for transport of dangerous goods by inland waterways.
The EU legislation governs only road and rail transport of dangerous goods – there are not yet EU rules for transport of dangerous goods by inland waterways.
The present Proposal is aiming at introducing international objectives of ADR, RID and ADN into national transport by the EU Member States.
The present Proposal is aiming at introducing international objectives of ADR, RID and ADN into national transport by the EU Member States.
Some of solutions based on the UN Recommendations will be updated in the Proposal.
Some of solutions based on the UN Recommendations will be updated in the Proposal.
Moreover, all three modes of transport (road, rail and inland waterways) will be governed by one act.
Moreover, all three modes of transport (road, rail and inland waterways) will be governed by one act.
It will better serve transport and all involved in the dangerous goods transport and all Europeans in general – supporting environmental and society safety.
It will better serve transport and all involved in the dangerous goods transport and all Europeans in general – supporting environmental and society safety.
Transport policy of modal shift [White paper “European Transport Policy up to 2010: time to decide” (COM(2001)370)] will be enforced, costs, especially for multimodal operators, will be reduced.
Transport policy of modal shift [White paper “European Transport Policy up to 2010: time to decide” (COM(2001)370)] will be enforced, costs, especially for multimodal operators, will be reduced.
Your Rapporteur supports in general the Commission’s Proposal.
Your Rapporteur supports in general the Commission’s Proposal.
However he is of the opinion, that some detailed elements of the Proposal should be precised.
However he is of the opinion, that some detailed elements of the Proposal should be precised.
It concerns mainly correspondence of wording (derogations instead of provisions) and harmonisation of changing time period with 2-Year-Rythm of amendments to ADR, RID and ADN.
It concerns mainly correspondence of wording (derogations instead of provisions) and harmonisation of changing time period with 2-Year-Rythm of amendments to ADR, RID and ADN.
Сухопътен превоз на опасни товари
Inland transport of dangerous goods
Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Inés Ayala Sender, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Erik Meijer, Robert Navarro, Willi Piecyk, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Reinhard Rack, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Renate Sommer, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
(Опростена процедура - член 43, параграф 1от Правилника за дейността)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
PE 391.946v01-00
PE 391.946v01-00
мнозинство от подадените гласове за одобряване на съвместния проект
majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета и на Комисията ( COM(2007)0113 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2007)0113 )
– като взе предвид член 44, параграф 2, член 47, параграф 2, последно изречение, членове 55, 57, параграф 2, 71, 80, параграф 2, 93, 94, 133, 181а и член 300, параграф 2, последно изречение от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a and Article 300(2), last sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 101, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕОАЕ (Договора за Евратом),
– having regard to Article 101, second paragraph, of the EAEC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея 1 от Договора за ЕО, съобразно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0161/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0161/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по външни работи ( A6‑0254/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0254/2007 ),
Изготвяне на протокол към Споразумението за партньорство и сътрудничество между ЕО и Армения, като се има предвид присъединяването към ЕС на България и Румъния
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Armenia, to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
PE 391.949v01-00
PE 391.949v01-00
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета и на Комисията ( COM(2007)0114 )
– having regard to the proposal for a Council and Commission decision ( COM(2007)0114 )
– като взе предвид член 44, параграф 2, член 47, параграф 2, последно изречение, членове 55, 57, параграф 2, 71, 80, параграф 2, 93, 94, 133, 181а и член 300, параграф 2, второ изречение от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, and Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a and Article 300(2), second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея 1 от Договора за ЕО, съобразно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0160/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3) first paragraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0160/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по външни работи ( A6‑0255/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0255/2007 ),
Изготвяне на протокол към Споразумението за партньорство и сътрудничество между ЕО и Азербайджан, като се има предвид присъединяването към ЕС на България и Румъния
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Azerbaijan to take account of the accession of the Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
(Опростена процедура - член 43, параграф 1от Правилника за дейността)
(Simplified procedure - Rule 43(1) of the Rules of Procedure)
PE 391.950v01-00
PE 391.950v01-00
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета и на Комисията ( COM(2007)0098 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0098 )
– като взе предвид член 44, параграф 2, член 47, параграф 2, последно изречение, членове 55, 57, параграф 2, 71, 80, параграф 2, 93, 94, 133, 181а и член 300, параграф 2, второ изречение от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard Article 44(2), Article 47(2), last sentence, Articles 55, 57(2), 71, 80(2), 93, 94, 133, 181a, and Article 300(2), second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея 1 от Договора за ЕО, съобразно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0162/2007 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0162/2007 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по външни работи ( A6‑0256/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6‑0256/2007 ),
Изготвяне на протокол към Споразумението за партньорство и сътрудничество между ЕО и Грузия, като се има предвид присъединяването към ЕС на България и Румъния
Conclusion of the Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the EC and Georgia, to take account of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the EU
относно съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно приложимото право към извъндоговорни задължения (“Рим II”)
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II”)
(PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 – 2003/0168(COD))
(PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 – 2003/0168(COD))
PE 390.527v02-00
PE 390.527v02-00
за съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно приложимото право към извъндоговорни задължения (“Рим II”)
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II”)
(PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 – 2003/0168(COD) )
(PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 – 2003/0168(COD) )
– като взе предвид съвместния проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет (PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3619/2007 – C6‑0142/2007 ),
– като взе предвид промененото предложение на Комисията ( COM(2006)0083 )
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0083 )
Приети текстове , P6_TA(2007)0006 . по общата позиция на Съвета
Texts Adopted ,18.1.2007, P6_TA(2007)0006 . on the Council common position
– като взе предвид становището на Комисията по измененията в общата позиция, внесени от Парламента ( COM(2007)0126 )
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2007)0126 )
– като взе предвид доклада на своята делегация в помирителния комитет ( A6‑0257/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0257/2007 ),
Одобрява съвместния текст и обръща внимание на становищата на Съвета и на Комисията в него;
Approves the joint text and draws attention to the Council and Commission statements thereon;
Възлага на своя председател да подпише акта заедно с председателя на Съвета съгласно член 254, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕО;
Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council pursuant to Article 254(1) of the EC Treaty;
Възлага на своя генерален секретар да подпише акта след проверка на надлежното изпълнение на всички процедури и да пристъпи към публикуването му заедно с генералния секретар на Съвета в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Възлага на своя председател да предаде настоящата законодателна резолюция на Съвета и на Комисията.
Instructs its President to forward this legislative resolution to the Council and the Commission.
The Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations ("Rome II") seeks to harmonise the Members States' rules of conflict of laws , which determine the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (torts or delicts in relation, for instance, with traffic accidents, product liability, unfair competition, environmental damage).
The Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations ("Rome II") seeks to harmonise the Members States' rules of conflict of laws , which determine the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (torts or delicts in relation, for instance, with traffic accidents, product liability, unfair competition, environmental damage).
As an instrument of the Private International Law the Regulation does not harmonise the Member States' substantive law, but their conflict of law rules.
As an instrument of the Private International Law the Regulation does not harmonise the Member States' substantive law, but their conflict of law rules.
Conflict of law rules determine the applicable national law on cross-border disputes, but do not decide a case in substance.
Conflict of law rules determine the applicable national law on cross-border disputes, but do not decide a case in substance.
This technique is particularly advantageous as it secures application of the same national law in similar cases, irrespective of which national court ("forum") deals with the specific case, thus increasing legal certainty for individuals and economic operators involved in cross-border disputes and avoiding "forum shopping", while at the same time preserving the autonomy of national law.
This technique is particularly advantageous as it secures application of the same national law in similar cases, irrespective of which national court ("forum") deals with the specific case, thus increasing legal certainty for individuals and economic operators involved in cross-border disputes and avoiding "forum shopping", while at the same time preserving the autonomy of national law.
International jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments are dealt with by the "Brussels I" Regulation, which applies to both contractual and non-contractual obligations.
International jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments are dealt with by the "Brussels I" Regulation, which applies to both contractual and non-contractual obligations.
As regards the applicable law, contractual obligations were harmonised by the Rome Convention of 1980, which is to be replaced by the "Rome I" Regulation, currently being negotiated in the Council and Parliament.
As regards the applicable law, contractual obligations were harmonised by the Rome Convention of 1980, which is to be replaced by the "Rome I" Regulation, currently being negotiated in the Council and Parliament.
However, until now there were no EU-wide harmonised rules for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.
However, until now there were no EU-wide harmonised rules for determining the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.
The "Rome II" Regulation is intended to fill this gap.
The "Rome II" Regulation is intended to fill this gap.
The codecision and conciliation procedure
The codecision and conciliation procedure
The Commission submitted on 22 July 2003 a proposal for a Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations.
The Commission submitted on 22 July 2003 a proposal for a Regulation on the Law Applicable on Non-Contractual Obligations.
Following Parliament's first reading on 6 July 2005 (54 amendments adopted) the Council adopted its common position on 25 September 2006.
Following Parliament's first reading on 6 July 2005 (54 amendments adopted) the Council adopted its common position on 25 September 2006.
Parliament then concluded its second reading on 18 January 2007 adopting 19 amendments to the Council's common position.
Parliament then concluded its second reading on 18 January 2007 adopting 19 amendments to the Council's common position.
The main issues at stake were: violation of personality rights ("defamation"); road traffic accidents; unfair competition; the definition of "environmental damage"; the relationship with other Community instruments; the treatment of foreign law; the review clause.
The main issues at stake were: violation of personality rights ("defamation"); road traffic accidents; unfair competition; the definition of "environmental damage"; the relationship with other Community instruments; the treatment of foreign law; the review clause.
The Council informed with letter from 19 April 2007 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
The Council informed with letter from 19 April 2007 that it could not accept all of Parliament's amendments and that conciliation was necessary.
Conciliation was then formally opened on 15 May 2007.
Conciliation was then formally opened on 15 May 2007.
The Parliament Delegation held its constituent meeting on 15 February 2007 in Strasbourg.
The Parliament Delegation held its constituent meeting on 15 February 2007 in Strasbourg.
Ms Rothe, Vice-President and Chair of the Delegation, Mr Gargani, Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Ms Wallis, rapporteur, were given a mandate by the Delegation to negotiate with the Council.
Ms Rothe, Vice-President and Chair of the Delegation, Mr Gargani, Chair of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Ms Wallis, rapporteur, were given a mandate by the Delegation to negotiate with the Council.
Three trilogues held between 6 March and 24 April 2007 (6.3.2007, 27.3.2006 and 24.4.2007), followed by subsequent meetings of the EP Delegation (14.3.2007, 28.3.2007 and 26.4.2007), lead to provisional agreement on 5 amendments.
Three trilogues held between 6 March and 24 April 2007 (6.3.2007, 27.3.2006 and 24.4.2007), followed by subsequent meetings of the EP Delegation (14.3.2007, 28.3.2007 and 26.4.2007), lead to provisional agreement on 5 amendments.
The Conciliation Committee met then in the evening of 15 May 2007 in the European Parliament with a view to formally opening the conciliation procedure and possibly reaching agreement on the outstanding issues.
The Conciliation Committee met then in the evening of 15 May 2007 in the European Parliament with a view to formally opening the conciliation procedure and possibly reaching agreement on the outstanding issues.
After several hours of deliberations an overall agreement was reached at midnight.
After several hours of deliberations an overall agreement was reached at midnight.
It was unanimously confirmed by the EP Delegation with 17 votes in favour.
It was unanimously confirmed by the EP Delegation with 17 votes in favour.
The main points of the agreement reached can be summarised as follows:
The main points of the agreement reached can be summarised as follows:
Road traffic accidents
Road traffic accidents
The general rule introduced by "Rome II" is the " lex loci delicti" whereby the law applicable is the law of the country in which the damage occurs.
The general rule introduced by "Rome II" is the " lex loci delicti" whereby the law applicable is the law of the country in which the damage occurs.
In the case of cross-border road traffic accidents this broadly accepted rule can lead to unsatisfactory situations due to the widely differing levels of compensation awarded by national courts: when the victim of the accident is resident in another country than the one in which the accident occurred, the amount of the compensation to be awarded will have to be calculated according to the law and standards of the country of the accident and not the country of the residence of the victim, in which however he or she will have to recover from the injuries and possibly also live with the consequences of the accident.
In the case of cross-border road traffic accidents this broadly accepted rule can lead to unsatisfactory situations due to the widely differing levels of compensation awarded by national courts: when the victim of the accident is resident in another country than the one in which the accident occurred, the amount of the compensation to be awarded will have to be calculated according to the law and standards of the country of the accident and not the country of the residence of the victim, in which however he or she will have to recover from the injuries and possibly also live with the consequences of the accident.
One of the EP Delegation's main priorities was therefore to ensure that the individual victim's actual circumstances are taken into consideration by the court seized when deciding on the level of the compensation to be awarded.
One of the EP Delegation's main priorities was therefore to ensure that the individual victim's actual circumstances are taken into consideration by the court seized when deciding on the level of the compensation to be awarded.
For the short term, the EP Delegation succeeded in including a reference in the recitals of the Regulation whereby judges when quantifying personal injuries will take account of all relevant actual circumstances of the specific victim, including in particular the actual losses and cost of after-care and medical attention.
For the short term, the EP Delegation succeeded in including a reference in the recitals of the Regulation whereby judges when quantifying personal injuries will take account of all relevant actual circumstances of the specific victim, including in particular the actual losses and cost of after-care and medical attention.
For the long term, the EP Delegation succeeded in securing a public commitment by the Commission for a detailed study on all options, including insurance aspects, on the specific problems faced by victims of cross-border road traffic accidents.
For the long term, the EP Delegation succeeded in securing a public commitment by the Commission for a detailed study on all options, including insurance aspects, on the specific problems faced by victims of cross-border road traffic accidents.
The study will be presented by 2008 the latest and would pave the way for a Green Paper.
The study will be presented by 2008 the latest and would pave the way for a Green Paper.
It is expected that the findings of the study will make the Commission and Member States realise the need for specific legislation in this field.
It is expected that the findings of the study will make the Commission and Member States realise the need for specific legislation in this field.
Unfair competition
Unfair competition
On the EP Delegation's insistence the Council agreed to the Commission's proposal for a specific rule on unfair competition that respects the principle of the application of one single national law (an important point for judges and lawyers) while at the same time limiting to a large extent the danger of "forum shopping" (the possibility for plaintiffs to raise their law suit in the Member State of their choice).
On the EP Delegation's insistence the Council agreed to the Commission's proposal for a specific rule on unfair competition that respects the principle of the application of one single national law (an important point for judges and lawyers) while at the same time limiting to a large extent the danger of "forum shopping" (the possibility for plaintiffs to raise their law suit in the Member State of their choice).