natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(ii) след връчване лично на решението и след като лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване, на което лицето ще има правото да присъства, делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение :
(ii) after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
- изрично е заявило, че не обжалва задочно постановеното решение ;
– expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia ;
Член 5 – точка 3
Article 5 – point 3
Приложение – клетка к – точка 1– букви а) и б)
Annex – box k – point 1 - points a and b
 Не, не е постановено задочно
a.  No, it was not
 Да, лицето се е явило лично на съдебния процес, вследствие на който е постановено решението.
a.  Yes, the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
б.  Да, постановено е задочно.
b.  Yes, it was.
б.  Не, лицето не се е явило лично на съдебния процес, вследствие на който е постановено решението.
b.  No, the person did not appear in person at the trial resulting in the decision.
Рамково решение 2002/.../ПВР
Framework Decision 2002/.../JHA
Приложение – клетка к – точка 1 - буква б.1
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.1
 б.1 лицето е било призовано лично или уведомено съгласно националното законодателство на издаващата държава-членка, чрез упълномощен представител и в подходящ срок, за определената дата и място на заседанието, довело до задочно постановеното решение, както и че е било уведомено за възможността за постановяване на подобно решение в случай на неявяване по време на съдебния процес
 b.1 the person was summoned in person or informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State through a competent representative and in due time, of the scheduled date and place of the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia and informed about the fact that such a decision may be handed down in case the person does not appear for the trial
2.1 лицето е било призовано пряко и лично , или по друг начин действително е получило в подходящ срок официална информация , на разбираем за него език, съгласно националното законодателство на издаващата държава-членка, за определената дата и място на съдебния процес, довел до постановеното решение, по начин, който недвусмислено доказва, че въпросното лице е било информирано за определената дата и място на съдебния процес и е било уведомено лично за възможността за постановяване на решение и ако лицето не се яви на съдебния процес
 b.1 the person was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information in due time and in a language which he/she understood , in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State , , about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the decision in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial
Време и място на призоваване на лицето или на неговото уведомяване по друг начин :
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or otherwise informed :
Приложение – клетка к – точка 1– буква б.1 а (нова)
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.1 a (new)
 б.1a след като е бил лично призован или действително е получил официална информация по друг начин, на език, разбираем за него, относно определената дата и място на съдебния процес, ответникът писмено е упълномощил адвокат, който е бил избран, назначен и получил възнаграждение от въпросното лице, или назначен и получил възнаграждение от държавата в съответствие с националните разпоредби, приложими относно правото на съдебна защита, да го защитава на съдебния процес, и действително е получил практическа и ефективна правна помощ и представителство;
 b.1a having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Приложение – клетка к – точка 1 - буква б.2
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.2
 б.2 след връчване на задочно постановеното решение , лицето изрично е заявило, че не оспорва задочно постановеното решение.
 b.2 the person, after being served with the decision rendered in absentia , expressly stated that he or she does not contest the decision rendered in absentia .
 б.2 след връчване лично на решението и след като лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване, на което лицето ще има правото да присъства, делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение, лицето изрично е заявило, че не оспорва решението
 b.2 the person, after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision.
Приложение – клетка к – точка 1 - буква б.3
Annex – box k – point 1 - point b.3
 б.3 задочно постановеното решение му е било връчено на … (ден/месец/година) и лицето е имало право на повторно разглеждане в издаващата държава при следните условия:
 b.3 the person was served with the decision rendered in absentia on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial in the issuing State under the following conditions:
 б.3 решението му е било връчено лично и вследствие на съдебен процес, на който заинтересованото лице не се е явило лично на … (ден/месец/година) и е имало право на повторно разглеждане или обжалване в издаващата държава при следните условия:
 b.3 the person was personally served with the decision following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial or to an appeal in the issuing State under the following conditions:
- лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване , на което лицето ще има правото да присъства , делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение, и
- the person was expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood , about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , and
- след като е било уведомено за това право, лицето е разполагало с … дни, за да поиска повторно разглеждане или обжалване , но не е отправило такова искане в този срок.
- after being informed of that right, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or an appeal and he or she did not make such a request during that period.
Изменения на Рамково решение2008/…/ПВР
Amendments to Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA
Рамково решение 2008/.../ПВР се изменя, както следва:
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA is hereby amended as follows:
1) точка … от член … се заменя със следното:
1 ) in Article ... , point .... shall be replaced by the following:
з) съгласно предвиденото в член 4 удостоверение, решението е постановено на съдебен процес, на който заинтересованото лице не се е явило лично, освен ако в удостоверението не е посочено, че лицето, в съответствие с националните разпоредби на издаващата държава-членка:
(h) according to the certificate provided for in Article ... , the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State:
а) в съответния срок и на разбираем за лицето език,
(a) in due time, and in a language which he/she understood,
- е било пряко призовано лично, или по друг начин действително е получило официална информация за определеното време и място на процеса, по начин, който недвусмислено доказва, че е било уведомено за процеса,
- either was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial,
- е било лично уведомено, че решението може да бъде постановено и ако то не се яви на съдебния процес;
- was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear at the trial;
б) след като е бил лично призован или действително е получил официална информация по друг начин, на език, разбираем за него, относно определената дата и място на съдебния процес, ответникът писмено е упълномощил адвокат, който е бил избран, назначен и получил възнаграждение от въпросното лице, или назначен и получил възнаграждение от държавата в съответствие с националните разпоредби, приложими относно правото на съдебна защита, да го защитава на съдебния процес, и действително е получил практическа и ефективна правна помощ и представителство; или
(b) having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial , had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial; or
в) след връчване лично на решението и след като лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване, на което лицето ще има правото да присъства, делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение:
(c) after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed :
- изрично е заявило, че не обжалва решението;
- expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision;
- не е поискало повторно разглеждане или обжалване в приложимия за целта срок, който е не по-кратък от 10 дни и не по-дълъг от 15 дни.
- did not request a retrial or an appeal in the applicable timeframe , which shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days.
2) в приложението („удостоверение”) точка… се заменя със следното:
2 ) in the Annex ("certificate"), point ... shall be replaced by the following:
з) Посочете дали лицето се е явило лично на съдебния процес, вследствие на който е постановено решението :
(h) Indicate if the person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision:
Ако отговорът на въпроса по-горе е отрицателен, моля посочете дали:
If you answered “no” to th is question , please indicate if:
2.1 лицето е призовано пряко и лично, или по друг начин действително е получило в подходящ срок официална информация , на разбираем за него език, съгласно националното законодателство на издаващата държава-членка, за определената дата и място на съдебния процес, вследствие на който е постановено решението, по начин, който недвусмислено доказва, че въпросното лице е било информирано за определената дата и място на съдебния процес и е било уведомено лично за възможността за постановяване на подобно решение в случай на неявяване по време на съдебния процес
2.1 the person was directly summoned in person or in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State by other means actually received official information, in due time and in a language which he/she understood, about the scheduled date and place of the trial which led to the decision in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial and was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he/she did not appear for the trial
Време и място на призоваване на лицето или лично получаване от него на официалната информация по друг начин:
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or received the official information in person by other means :
2.2. след като е бил лично призован или действително е получил официална информация по друг начин, на език, разбираем за него, относно определената дата и място на съдебния процес, ответникът писмено е упълномощил адвокат, който е бил избран, назначен и получил възнаграждение от въпросното лице, или назначен и получил възнаграждение от държавата в съответствие с националните разпоредби, приложими относно правото на съдебна защита, да го защитава на съдебния процес, и действително е получил практическа и ефективна правна помощ и представителство;
2.2. having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he/she was aware of the trial , had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
2.3 след връчване лично на решението и след като лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване, на което лицето ще има правото да присъства, делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение, лицето изрично е заявило, че не оспорва решението.
2.3 the person, after being personally served with the decision and being expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , expressly stated that he or she did not contest the decision.
2.4 решението му е било връчено лично и вследствие на съдебен процес, на който заинтересованото лице не се е явило лично на … (ден/месец/година) и е имало право на повторно разглеждане или обжалване в издаващата държава при следните условия:
2.4 the person was personally served with the decision following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person on ………… (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial or to an appeal in the issuing State under the following conditions:
- след като лицето е било изрично уведомено на разбираем за него език за правото на повторно разглеждане или на обжалване, на което лицето ще има правото да присъства, делото ще се (пре)разгледа по същество, като се включат нови доказателства, и производството може да доведе до отмяна на първоначалното решение, и
- the person was expressly informed, in a language which he/she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal , in which he/she would have the right to participate, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed , and
- след като е било уведомено за това право, лицето е разполагало с … дни, за да поиска повторно разглеждане или обжалване, но не е отправило такова искане в този срок.
- after being informed of that right, the person had ...... days to request a retrial or an appeal and he or she did not make such a request during that period.
The right to the trial is a fundamental right provided in the United Nation's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The right to the trial is a fundamental right provided in the United Nation's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
However, this right is not absolute.
However, this right is not absolute.
Under certain conditions decisions could be rendered following a trial at which a person concerned did not appeared personally, so-called, judgments in absentia .
Under certain conditions decisions could be rendered following a trial at which a person concerned did not appeared personally, so-called, judgments in absentia .
In application of the principle of mutual recognition, a judicial authority in one Member State shall enforce a decision issued by a judicial authority in another Member State.
In application of the principle of mutual recognition, a judicial authority in one Member State shall enforce a decision issued by a judicial authority in another Member State.
However, some exceptions exist and one of them is a situation when a judgment is rendered in absentia .
However, some exceptions exist and one of them is a situation when a judgment is rendered in absentia .
Currently there are several EU instruments (adopted or waiting adoption at the Council) which deal with the issue of judgments in absentia.
Currently there are several EU instruments (adopted or waiting adoption at the Council) which deal with the issue of judgments in absentia.
However, they deal with this question differently and that is an obstacle for a mutual recognition of those judgments.
However, they deal with this question differently and that is an obstacle for a mutual recognition of those judgments.
This leads to a non-coherent system at EU level which is characterized by (unwanted) judicial uncertainty.
This leads to a non-coherent system at EU level which is characterized by (unwanted) judicial uncertainty.
To redress this situation, 7 Member States have come with a proposal to align the criteria for applying the grounds for non-recognition related to decisions rendered in absentia in the following four instruments:
To redress this situation, 7 Member States have come with a proposal to align the criteria for applying the grounds for non-recognition related to decisions rendered in absentia in the following four instruments:
1) Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States,
1) Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States,
2) Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties,
2) Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties,
3) Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders;
3) Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders;
4) Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union.
4) Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union.
The rapporteur considers that there is a need to include also the fifth instrument in the scope of the proposal, namely, Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences.
The rapporteur considers that there is a need to include also the fifth instrument in the scope of the proposal, namely, Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences.
This alignment would result in more clear rules in respect to legal clarity and would facilitate judicial cooperation.
This alignment would result in more clear rules in respect to legal clarity and would facilitate judicial cooperation.
Moreover, the proposal increases the protection of fundamental procedural rights, such as, the right to the defence and the right to the trial.
Moreover, the proposal increases the protection of fundamental procedural rights, such as, the right to the defence and the right to the trial.
Despite the fact that the proposal aims at the alignment of grounds for non-recognition of judgments rendered in absentia , the objective of the proposal is not to harmonize the concepts, but rather to deal with the question of the different regimes horizontally.
Despite the fact that the proposal aims at the alignment of grounds for non-recognition of judgments rendered in absentia , the objective of the proposal is not to harmonize the concepts, but rather to deal with the question of the different regimes horizontally.
The proposal defines effects of judicial cooperation or common approach to situations when there is a judgment rendered in absentia .
The proposal defines effects of judicial cooperation or common approach to situations when there is a judgment rendered in absentia .
Main points of the proposal
Main points of the proposal
Summoning of a person concerned
Summoning of a person concerned
The proposal emphasizes the importance of the adequate way of summoning a person.
The proposal emphasizes the importance of the adequate way of summoning a person.
It is crucial that a person concerned is informed in due time about the date and place of his/her trial.
It is crucial that a person concerned is informed in due time about the date and place of his/her trial.
Only if those requirements are met, a decision rendered in absentia could be recognised and executed.
Only if those requirements are met, a decision rendered in absentia could be recognised and executed.
In this way, it is ensured that the right to the trial is observed.
In this way, it is ensured that the right to the trial is observed.
However, according to the rapporteur, it is important to take into account diversity of legal systems of Member States as they have their own specific forms of summoning a person.
However, according to the rapporteur, it is important to take into account diversity of legal systems of Member States as they have their own specific forms of summoning a person.
It is not only through the summoning of the defendant in person or otherwise personally that his or her rights are guaranteed.
It is not only through the summoning of the defendant in person or otherwise personally that his or her rights are guaranteed.
Member States have further procedural dispositions which guarantee that the person is summoned and, if there is any problem with the summoning procedure, the person can present that situation to courts.
Member States have further procedural dispositions which guarantee that the person is summoned and, if there is any problem with the summoning procedure, the person can present that situation to courts.
Taking more account of a right to a retrial
Taking more account of a right to a retrial
The proposal emphasises the role of a retrial in safeguarding the appropriate observance of the right to a trial.
The proposal emphasises the role of a retrial in safeguarding the appropriate observance of the right to a trial.