natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The rapporteur therefore proposes to adopt the Council decision without amendments.
The rapporteur therefore proposes to adopt the Council decision without amendments.
However, the rapporteur invites the Council to rectify the Council decision based on the Commission's recommendation as regards the entry into force of the three last protocols
However, the rapporteur invites the Council to rectify the Council decision based on the Commission's recommendation as regards the entry into force of the three last protocols
The Protocols of 30 November 2000, 28 November 2002 and 27 November 2003. since they entered into force in March/April 2007.
The Protocols of 30 November 2000, 28 November 2002 and 27 November 2003. since they entered into force in March/April 2007.
Since no retroactive effect will be possible for Bulgaria and Romania, a new date following the adoption of this decision should be foreseen.
Since no retroactive effect will be possible for Bulgaria and Romania, a new date following the adoption of this decision should be foreseen.
Присъединяване на България и Румъния към Конвенцията за Европол от 26 юли 1995 г.
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 26 July 1995 on the Europol Convention
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Roger Knapman, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Roger Knapman, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
PE 390.434v02-00
PE 390.434v02-00
– като взе предвид препоръката на Комисията към Съвета ( COM(2007)0213 )
– having regard to the Commission recommendation ( COM(2007)0213 )
– като взе предвид член 3, параграф 4 от Договора от 2005 г. за присъединяване на България и Румъния, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до Парламента (С6-0158/2007),
– having regard to Article 3(4) of the Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0158/2007 ),
– като взе предвид членове 93 и 51 от своя правилник,
– having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0261/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0261/2007 ),
L'acte de 2005 relatif à l'adhésion de la Bulgarie et de la Roumanie
The 2005 Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania
JO L 157 du 21.6.2005, p.
OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p.
203. a introduit une procédure simplifiée pour l'adhésion de ces deux pays aux conventions (et protocoles) conclues par les États membres sur le fondement de l'article 34 du Traité sur l'Union européenne.
203. provides for a simplified system for accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the conventions (and protocols) concluded by the Member States on the basis of Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union.
L'annexe I à l'acte d'adhésion énumère les sept conventions et protocoles concernés dans le domaine "Justice et affaires intérieures", dont la convention du 29 mai 2000 établie par le Conseil conformément à l'article 34 du traité sur l'Union européenne, relative à l'entraide judiciaire en matière pénale entre les États membres de l'Union européenne, et son protocole du 16 octobre 2001 à la convention relative à l'entraide judiciaire en matière pénale entre les États membres de l'Union européenne, établi par le Conseil conformément à l'article 34 du traité sur l'Union européenne.
Annex I to the above-mentioned Act of Accession gives the list of the seven conventions and protocols concerned in the Justice and Home Affairs area, including the Convention of 29 May 2000, established by the Council in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and its Protocol of 16 October 2001, established by the Council in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union, to the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union.
Avec ce système simplifié, il n'est désormais plus nécessaire de négocier et de conclure des protocoles spécifiques d'adhésion à ces conventions.
Taking into account the above-mentioned simplified system, it is not anymore necessary to negotiate and conclude specific accession protocols.
Pour que ces conventions et protocoles entrent en vigueur en Bulgarie et en Roumanie, il suffit que le Conseil prenne une décision fixant la date d'entrée en vigueur de ces conventions et de leurs protocoles, après consultation du Parlement européen
In order to make the above-mentioned Convention and its related protocol enter into force for Bulgaria and Romania, the Council should only adopt a decision determining the date on which the Convention and its protocols shall enter into force, after having consulted the European Parliament
Conformément à l'article 3, paragraphes 3 et 4, de l'acte d'adhésion de 2005 (JO L 157 du 21.6.2005, p.
In accordance with Article 3(3) and (4) of the 2005 Act of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania (OJ L 157, 21.6.2005, p.
Votre rapporteur propose donc d'approuver, sans la modifier, la décision du Conseil.
The rapporteur therefore proposes to adopt the Council decision without amendments.
Присъединяване на България и Румъния към Конвенцията от 29 май 2000 г. за взаимна помощ по наказателни дела между държавите-членки на Европейския съюз
Accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Roger Knapman, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Athanasios Pafilis, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Alfredo Antoniozzi, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Giuseppe Castiglione, Giusto Catania, Carlos Coelho, Fausto Correia, Elly de Groen-Kouwenhoven, Esther De Lange, Panayiotis Demetriou, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Kinga Gál, Patrick Gaubert, Roland Gewalt, Lilli Gruber, Adeline Hazan, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Roger Knapman, Magda Kósáné Kovács, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Barbara Kudrycka, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Dan Mihalache, Viktória Mohácsi, Claude Moraes, Javier Moreno Sánchez, Athanasios Pafilis, Luciana Sbarbati, Inger Segelström, Károly Ferenc Szabó, Vladimir Andreev Urutchev, Ioannis Varvitsiotis, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Заместник( ци ), присъстващ(и) на окончателното гласуване
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
Inger Segelström
Inger Segelström
PE 390.766v02-00
PE 390.766v02-00
относно общата позиция на Съвета с оглед приемане на решение на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за създаване на специалната програма „Гражданско правосъдие“ за периода 2007-2013 г. като част от общата програма „Основни права и правосъдие“
on the Council common position for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing for the period 2007-2013 the Specific Programme "Civil Justice" as part of the General Programme "Fundamental Rights and Justice"
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (8699/2/2007 – C6‑0179/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (8699/2/2007 – C6‑0179/2007 ),
Все още непубликувано в ОВ. по предложението на Комисията към Европейския парламент и към Съвета ( COM(2005)0122 )
Not yet published in OJ. on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0122 )
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 251(2)(c) of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0262/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0262/2007 ),
Съображение 16 А (ново)
Recital 16 a (new)
(16 а) Предвид правомощията на Европейския парламент, определени в член 8 на Решение 1999/468/ЕО, следва Комисията да предоставя на Европейския парламент цялата необходима информация относно всеки етап от изпълнението на програмата, по-специално що се касае до планираните приоритети за съответната година.
(16a) In the light of the prerogatives of the European Parliament as defined in Article 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC, all of the necessary information should be made available by the Commission to the European Parliament concerning each stage of the implementation of the Programme, particularly as regards the intended priorities thereof for the year in question.
В случай, че Парламентът изготви предложения или препоръки, Комисията се ангажира
Should Parliament put forward any suggestions or recommendations, the Commission has undertaken
С декларация на пленарно заседание на ... да даде обоснован отговор и да информира за това представителите на държавите-членки, събрани в рамките на комитети, предвидени в настоящото решение.
By a declaration in the plenary session of ... to provide a reasoned response and to inform the representatives of the Member States meeting within the committees provided for by this Decision.
При все това, заместник-председателят Фратини предложи вместо правото на налагане на вето от страна на Парламента, прилагането на по-прозрачен диалог при определянето на приоритетите за годишно финансиране.
Furthermore, Vice-President Frattini proposed a more transparent dialogue, as opposed to Parliament's right of veto, when identifying priorities for annual financing.
Това задължение бе представено в писмото от 31 май 2007 г. (вж. Изложението на мотивите).
This commitment has already been made in the letter of 31 May 2007, see in the explanatory statement.
Вашият докладчик не счита, че това е достатъчно, но в дух на компромис и поради факта, че изпълнението на финансовите програми трябва да започне възможно най-бързо, счита, че Парламентът би могъл да се откаже от предишното си изменение от декември 2006 г., с което настоява за правото на контрол и да приеме предложението на Комисията.
Your rapporteur does not deem this to be sufficient but, by way of compromise, and because these financial programmes must be put in place as quickly as possible, she considers that the Parliament could give up its previous December 2006 amendment requiring a right of scrutiny and accept the Commission's proposal .
Тъй като става въпрос за ангажимент на институциите и от съображения за прозрачност, то следва да бъде отбелязано в съображенията на законодателното предложение с цел европейските граждани и всички, които възнамеряват да се позовават на новите разпоредби, да могат да се запознаят с него.
Being an institutional undertaking it should, for transparency reasons, be mentioned in the recitals of the legislative proposal, so that European citizens, or at least all those who wish to take advantage of the new provisions, can be made aware of it.
Това изменение с декларативен характер повтаря по същество съдържанието на предложението на г-н Фратини и в случай, че Съветът го приеме, тази финансова програма (както и програмата за борба с наркотиците, за която все още очакваме общата позиция), ще може да влезе в сила в най-кратки срокове.
This declaratory amendment incorporates the essence of Mr Frattini's proposal and, if the Council accepts it, this financial programme (and the financial programme for the fight against drugs, on which we are still awaiting the common position) can come into force as early as possible.
Letter of 31 May 2007 from Mr Franco Frattini, Vice-President of the European Commission, to Mr Jean-Marie Cavada and Mrs Inger Segelström, Chairman of and rapporteur for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
Letter of 31 May 2007 from Mr Franco Frattini, Vice-President of the European Commission, to Mr Jean-Marie Cavada and Mrs Inger Segelström, Chairman of and rapporteur for the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
I am writing to you on the subject of the new financial instruments in the area of freedom, security and justice for the period 2007-2013.
I am writing to you on the subject of the new financial instruments in the area of freedom, security and justice for the period 2007-2013.
In December 2006 agreement was reached between Parliament, the Council and the Commission on all our proposals.
In December 2006 agreement was reached between Parliament, the Council and the Commission on all our proposals.
The various instruments which make up the general programmes 'Solidarity and management of migration flows' and 'Security and safeguarding liberties' were then adopted, or will shortly be adopted following legal-linguistic verification of the texts.
The various instruments which make up the general programmes 'Solidarity and management of migration flows' and 'Security and safeguarding liberties' were then adopted, or will shortly be adopted following legal-linguistic verification of the texts.
This is also the case for the programmes 'Fundamental rights and citizenship' and 'Criminal justice', which form part of the general programme 'Fundamental rights and justice'.
This is also the case for the programmes 'Fundamental rights and citizenship' and 'Criminal justice', which form part of the general programme 'Fundamental rights and justice'.
However, there is still some disagreement between the Commission and the Council, on the one hand, and Parliament, on the other, concerning the specific programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information' which is preventing for the moment the adoption of these programmes at second reading.
However, there is still some disagreement between the Commission and the Council, on the one hand, and Parliament, on the other, concerning the specific programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information' which is preventing for the moment the adoption of these programmes at second reading.
As you know, that disagreement is linked to the comitology procedure applicable.
As you know, that disagreement is linked to the comitology procedure applicable.
I know that Parliament, like the Council and the Commission, has always acknowledged and emphasised the significance of these programmes and attaches great importance to their implementation.
I know that Parliament, like the Council and the Commission, has always acknowledged and emphasised the significance of these programmes and attaches great importance to their implementation.
I myself have repeatedly highlighted the importance of these financial programmes.
I myself have repeatedly highlighted the importance of these financial programmes.
In terms of their substance and their funding, they represent a response to very specific expectations voiced by the professional groups concerned and the public in general.
In terms of their substance and their funding, they represent a response to very specific expectations voiced by the professional groups concerned and the public in general.
It is essential, therefore, that we should overcome this disagreement very quickly so that the two programmes in question can be implemented before the end of this year, since any further delay in their adoption would certainly jeopardise the disbursement of the expenditure earmarked for 2007 in the areas of civil justice and drugs prevention.
It is essential, therefore, that we should overcome this disagreement very quickly so that the two programmes in question can be implemented before the end of this year, since any further delay in their adoption would certainly jeopardise the disbursement of the expenditure earmarked for 2007 in the areas of civil justice and drugs prevention.
The Commission attaches great importance to the new comitology procedure introduced in 2006, which confers additional rights on Parliament, and is considering very carefully whether it applies to each of the measures concerned.
The Commission attaches great importance to the new comitology procedure introduced in 2006, which confers additional rights on Parliament, and is considering very carefully whether it applies to each of the measures concerned.
Its view, one shared by the Council, moreover, is that it does not apply to the programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information'.
Its view, one shared by the Council, moreover, is that it does not apply to the programmes 'Civil justice' and 'Drugs prevention and information'.
I should like to point out, however, that as long ago as January the Commission put forward a compromise solution designed to take account of Parliament's wish to be kept fully informed.
I should like to point out, however, that as long ago as January the Commission put forward a compromise solution designed to take account of Parliament's wish to be kept fully informed.
In a letter of 25 January 2007 I thus proposed, on an exceptional basis, that the Commission should give a political undertaking to comply with Parliament's wishes by providing it, in good time, with full information about the annual work programmes.
In a letter of 25 January 2007 I thus proposed, on an exceptional basis, that the Commission should give a political undertaking to comply with Parliament's wishes by providing it, in good time, with full information about the annual work programmes.
I also indicated my willingness, and that of my staff, to attend a meeting of the LIBE committee and answer its questions on that subject, if the committee so wished.
I also indicated my willingness, and that of my staff, to attend a meeting of the LIBE committee and answer its questions on that subject, if the committee so wished.
This undertaking on the part of the Commission would consolidate Parliament's 'right of scrutiny', as enshrined in the 1999 comitology decision, by ensuring that it is fully informed of developments at all stages in the procedure for the adoption of the annual programmes.
This undertaking on the part of the Commission would consolidate Parliament's 'right of scrutiny', as enshrined in the 1999 comitology decision, by ensuring that it is fully informed of developments at all stages in the procedure for the adoption of the annual programmes.
At a meeting held at Mrs Segelström's invitation in early February 2007, attended by my staff and representatives of the German Presidency, Parliament welcomed the proposals in principle.
At a meeting held at Mrs Segelström's invitation in early February 2007, attended by my staff and representatives of the German Presidency, Parliament welcomed the proposals in principle.
At that meeting, the Commission confirmed its willingness to formally set out its undertaking vis-à-vis Parliament in a declaration annexed to the programme.
At that meeting, the Commission confirmed its willingness to formally set out its undertaking vis-à-vis Parliament in a declaration annexed to the programme.
Unfortunately no further progress has been possible since then.
Unfortunately no further progress has been possible since then.
In the meantime, the Council is preparing to adopt common positions on the two programmes, following the political agreement reached on 20 April 2007.
In the meantime, the Council is preparing to adopt common positions on the two programmes, following the political agreement reached on 20 April 2007.
As you know, the purpose of these programmes is to co-finance projects carried out chiefly by NGOs and to implement measures of public interest in the areas concerned.
As you know, the purpose of these programmes is to co-finance projects carried out chiefly by NGOs and to implement measures of public interest in the areas concerned.
For example, in addition to implementing specific projects with a European dimension or supporting the work of NGOs, the aim is to fund measures covered by the Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008), to enable the European judicial network to continue its activities or to subsidise associations whose names have been put forward by Parliament itself.
For example, in addition to implementing specific projects with a European dimension or supporting the work of NGOs, the aim is to fund measures covered by the Drugs Action Plan (2005-2008), to enable the European judicial network to continue its activities or to subsidise associations whose names have been put forward by Parliament itself.
The beneficiaries of these actions would not understand the reasons for any further delay in adopting the programmes.
The beneficiaries of these actions would not understand the reasons for any further delay in adopting the programmes.
In addition, a further delay in adopting the programmes might jeopardise measures such as the comparative law study of the sensitive topic of international adoption or the preparation of a reference framework in the area of European contract law.
In addition, a further delay in adopting the programmes might jeopardise measures such as the comparative law study of the sensitive topic of international adoption or the preparation of a reference framework in the area of European contract law.
In the specific area of drugs prevention, dialogue with civil society, through the establishment and funding of a forum, would also be called into question.
In the specific area of drugs prevention, dialogue with civil society, through the establishment and funding of a forum, would also be called into question.
In the light of the undertaking given by the Commission and the need to implement the new financial programmes without delay, I would ask you to reconsider our proposals so that the programmes can be adopted promptly.
In the light of the undertaking given by the Commission and the need to implement the new financial programmes without delay, I would ask you to reconsider our proposals so that the programmes can be adopted promptly.
(Closing formula and signature)
(Closing formula and signature)
14.12.2006 T6-0580/2006
14.12.2006 T6-0580/2006