natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Въпреки това, държава-членка може да издаде специално разрешение за риболов на треска на риболовен кораб на Общността, плаващ под флага на съответната държава-членка и не притежавал специално разрешение за риболов през 2005 г., при условие че гарантира спирането от риболов в Балтийско море на кораби с капацитет равен най-малко на 1,2 пъти същата стойност, измерена в киловати (kW), с каквото и да било оборудване, упоменато в параграф 1.
However, a Member State may issue a special permit for fishing for cod to a Community vessel, flying the flag of that Member State, not holding a special fishing permit in 2005 if it ensures that at least 1.2 times the equivalent capacity, measured in kilowatts (kW), is prevented from fishing in the Baltic Sea with any gear referred to in paragraph 1.
This would reduce the excessive capacity in the Baltic fleets that target cod.
This would reduce the excessive capacity in the Baltic fleets that target cod.
Член 11, параграф 2 а (нов)
Article 11, paragraph 2 a (new)
The fleets in the Baltic that target cod are too large, so this would be a way to decrease capacity.
The fleets in the Baltic that target cod are too large, so this would be a way to decrease capacity.
Член 25, параграф 4 а (нов)
Article 25, paragraph 4 a (new)
Този доклад е публичен и показва ясно доколко различните държави-членки са постигнали успех в прилагането на настоящия регламент и къде мерките на държавите-членки са се срещнали с успех или неуспех.
This report shall be made public and it shall clearly indicate how successful the various Member States have been in applying this Regulation and where Member States’ measures have met with success or failure.
It is the Member States’ responsibility to ensure compliance with this regulation.
It is the Member States’ responsibility to ensure compliance with this regulation.
There are evidently serious shortcomings with their controls at the present time, which are harmful to the fish stock and the sensitive environment of the Baltic Sea.
There are evidently serious shortcomings with their controls at the present time, which are harmful to the fish stock and the sensitive environment of the Baltic Sea.
As the Commission is not directly able to control how Member States comply with this regulation, the method of naming those Member States which acquit themselves well and those that do not may push developments in the right direction.
As the Commission is not directly able to control how Member States comply with this regulation, the method of naming those Member States which acquit themselves well and those that do not may push developments in the right direction.
Член 27, параграф 2 а (нов)
Article 27, paragraph 2 a (new)
Това следва да се извърши заедно с оценката на настоящия регламент три години след неговото влизане в сила.
This shall be done in conjunction with the assessment of this Regulation, three years after its entry into force.
Резултатът от въпросната оценка следва да се взима под внимание при установяването на какъвто и да било нов план.
The result of this examination shall be taken into account when any new plan is established.
The individually transferable quota (ITQ) system has proved effective in protecting fish stocks and enabling fishermen to continue their livelihood.
The individually transferable quota (ITQ) system has proved effective in protecting fish stocks and enabling fishermen to continue their livelihood.
ITQ gives individual rights to fish by giving fishermen an individual quota per species, fishing ground and year.
ITQ gives individual rights to fish by giving fishermen an individual quota per species, fishing ground and year.
The total quota is initially set by an appropriate authority and subsequently set in accordance with a proposal from fishermen's own organisations.
The total quota is initially set by an appropriate authority and subsequently set in accordance with a proposal from fishermen's own organisations.
This strengthens fishermen’s own incentives to manage cod stocks in a sustainable manner.
This strengthens fishermen’s own incentives to manage cod stocks in a sustainable manner.
Многогодишен план за запасите от треска в Балтийско море и рибните стопанства, които експлоатират тези запаси
Multi-annual plan for the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks
Подпомагаща комисия
Opinion by
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Alexandru-Ioan Morţun, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Антония Първанова, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Alexandru-Ioan Morţun, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Antonyia Parvanova, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman
Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Jutta Haug, Karin Jöns, Henrik Lax, Jiří Maštálka, Andres Tarand, Radu Ţîrle
Christofer Fjellner, Milan Gaľa, Jutta Haug, Karin Jöns, Henrik Lax, Jiří Maštálka, Andres Tarand, Radu Ţîrle
Paolo Costa, Carl Schlyter, Thomas Wise
Paolo Costa, Carl Schlyter, Thomas Wise
относно общата позиция на Съвета за приемане на Регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно установяване на общи правила за отпускане на финансова помощ от Общността в областта на трансевропейските транспортни и енергийни мрежи
on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans‑European transport and energy networks
PE 386.659v02-00
PE 386.659v02-00
– като взе предвид общата позиция на Съвета (17032/02/2006 – C6‑0101/2007 ),
– having regard to the Council common position (17032/2/2006 – C6‑0101/2007 ),
– като взе предвид промененото предложение на Комисията (COM (2006)0245),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0245 ),
– като взе предвид препоръката за второ четене на комисия по бюджети ( A6‑0169/2007 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0169/2007 ),
26.10.2005 T6-0403/2005
26.10.2005 T6-0403/2005
Комитет за граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
PE 386.552v02-00
PE 386.552v02-00
Символи за процедури
Symbols for procedures
* Процедура на консултиране
* Consultation procedure
мнозинството от подадените гласове
majority of the votes cast
мнозинството от подадените гласое за одобряване на общата позиция
majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position
мнозинството от всички членове на Парламента за отхвърляне или изменение на общата позиция
majority of Parliament's component Members, to reject or amend the common position
*** Процедура на одобрение
*** Assent procedure
мнозинствто от всички членове на Парламента, освен в случаите, попадащи в приложното поле на членове 105, 107, 161 и 300 от Договора за ЕО и член 7 от Договора за ЕС
majority of Parliament's component Members except in cases covered by Articles 105, 107, 161 and 300 of the EC Treaty and Article 7 of the EU Treaty
мнозинството от подадените гласове за одобряване на общата позиция
majority of the votes cast, to approve the common position
мнозинството от подадените гласове за одобрение на съвместния текст
majority of the votes cast, to approve the joint text
(Видът процедура зависи от правното основание, предложено от Комисията.)
(The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the Commission.)
Измененията, внесени от Парламента, са откроени с получер шрифт и курсив .
In amendments by Parliament, amended text is highlighted in bold italics .
Открояването с курсив без получер шрифт е обозначение за съответните отдели, което показва части от законодателния текст, за които се предлага корекция, за да се подпомогне изготвянето на окончателния текст (например, очевидни грешки или пропуски в дадена езикова версия).
Highlighting in normal italics is an indication for the relevant departments showing parts of the legislative text for which a correction is proposed, to assist preparation of the final text (for instance, obvious errors or omissions in a given language version).
Тези предложения за корекции подлежат на съгласуване със съответните отдели.
These suggested corrections are subject to the agreement of the departments concerned.
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................21
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................20
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията ( COM(2005)0690 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0690 )
Все още непубликуван в ОВ. ,
Not yet published in OJ. ,
– като взе предвид членове 31 и 34, параграф 2, буква б) от Договора за ЕС,
– having regard to Articles 31 and 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 39, параграф 1 от Договора за ЕС, съгласно който Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0052/2006 ),
– having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0052/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на Комитета за граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0170/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0170/2007 ),
член 250, параграф 2, от Договора за ЕО;
Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
(8a) Фактът, че за една наказателна присъда могат да се прилагат различни правни режими, води до разпространение на ненадеждна информация между държавите-членки и създава правна несигурност за осъденото лице.
(8a) The fact that different legal regimes may apply to a single criminal conviction leads to the circulation of unreliable information between Member States and creates legal uncertainty for the convicted person.
За да се избегне тази ситуация, осъждащата държава-членка се счита за собственик на данните за наказателните присъди, произнесени на нейната територия срещу граждани на други държави-членки.
To avoid this situation, the convicting Member State should be regarded as the owner of the data on criminal convictions handed down on its territory against nationals of other Member States.
Съответно, държавата-членка, чийто гражданин е осъденото лице и на която ще бъдат предадени тези данни, трябва да гарантира тяхното осъвременяване чрез отчитане на всякакви промени или заличавания, настъпващи в осъждащата държава-членка.
Accordingly, the Member State of nationality of the convicted person, to which these data will be transmitted, must ensure that they are kept up-to-date by taking into account any alteration or deletion occurring in the convicting Member State.
Единствено данни, които са били осъвременявани по този начин, следва да се използват за вътрешни цели от държавата-членка, на която е гражданин лицето, или след това да се предават от нея на друга държава, било то друга държава-членка или трета страна.
Only data that have been kept up-to-date in this way should be used internally by the Member State of nationality or further transmitted by it to any other State, being another Member State or a third country.
(10) Personal data handled as part of the implementation of this Framework Decision are protected in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision XXX on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.
(10) Personal data handled as part of the implementation of this Framework Decision are protected in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision XXX on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters .
This Framework Decision also incorporates the provisions of the Decision of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records11, which limit the use the requesting Member State can make of information asked for.
This Framework Decision also incorporates the provisions of the Decision of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records11, which limit the use the requesting Member State can make of information asked for.
It supplements them with specific rules applying where the Member State of the person’s nationality forward conviction information transmitted to it by the convicting Member State.
It supplements them with specific rules applying where the Member State of the person’s nationality forward conviction information transmitted to it by the convicting Member State.
10) Личните данни, обработвани в рамките на прилагането на настоящото Рамково решение, са защитени съгласно разпоредбите на Рамково решение XXX относно защитата на лични данни, обработвани в рамките на полицейското и съдебно сътрудничество по наказателноправни въпроси, и по-специално съгласно основните принципи за защита на личните данни, посочени в член 9 на настоящото Рамково решение.
(10) Personal data handled as part of the implementation of this Framework Decision are protected in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision XXX on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and in particular with the basic principles of data protection referred to in Article 9 of this Framework Decision.
Настоящото Рамково решение включва и разпоредбите на Решението от 21 ноември 2005 г. относно обмен на информация, получена от данните за съдимост, които налагат ограничения за използването на поисканата информация от страна на отправилата запитване държава-членка.
This Framework Decision also incorporates the provisions of the Decision of 21 November 2005 on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal records, which limit the use the requesting Member State can make of information asked for.
То ги допълва с конкретни правила, които се прилагат, когато държавата-членка на гражданството на лицето препраща информация относно присъдата, предадена й от държавата-членка на присъдата.
It supplements them with specific rules applying where the Member State of the person’s nationality forward conviction information transmitted to it by the convicting Member State.
The Framework decision on data protection in the context of police and judicial cooperation, which should apply also to the present act as a lex generalis, is still in the process of being finalised; for this reasons it seems necessary to recall a basic set of general data protection principles to be respected while collecting, processing, transmitting data within the scope of present Framework Decision.
The Framework decision on data protection in the context of police and judicial cooperation, which should apply also to the present act as a lex generalis, is still in the process of being finalised; for this reasons it seems necessary to recall a basic set of general data protection principles to be respected while collecting, processing, transmitting data within the scope of present Framework Decision.
12a) Подобряването на обмена и разпространението на информацията за съдимостта може значително да засили съдебното и полицейско сътрудничество на ниво ЕС, но това сътрудничество може да бъде затруднено, ако не се допълни от бързо приемане на единен набор от основни процесуални гаранции за заподозрeните и подсъдими лица в наказателните производства, приложими във всички държави-членки.
(12a) Improving the exchange and circulation of information on convictions can considerably enhance judicial and police cooperation at EU level but such cooperation may be hampered if it is not supplemented by the swift adoption of a uniform set of basic procedural guarantees for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings applicable in all Member States.
The Framework Decision on procedural guarantees for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings is still pending adoption in Council since 2004 and this delay can considerably hamper progresses in judicial and police cooperation, in particular creating conflicts with constitutional measures at a national level.
The Framework Decision on procedural guarantees for suspects and defendants in criminal proceedings is still pending adoption in Council since 2004 and this delay can considerably hamper progresses in judicial and police cooperation, in particular creating conflicts with constitutional measures at a national level.
Член 1, буква a)
Article 1, point (a)
(a) to define the ways in which a Member State in which a conviction is handed down against a national of another Member State (the "convicting Member State") may transmit such a conviction to the Member State of the convicted person's nationality (the "Member State of the person's nationality")
(a) to define the ways in which a Member State in which a conviction is handed down against a national of another Member State (the "convicting Member State") may transmit such a conviction to the Member State of the convicted person's nationality (the "Member State of the person's nationality")
a) да определи начините, по които държавата-членка, в която е издадена присъда срещу гражданин на друга държава-членка (по-долу „държава-членка на присъдата“), предава информацията относно въпросната присъда на държавата-членка, чийто гражданин се явява осъденото лице (по-долу „държава-членка на гражданството“)
(a) to define the ways in which a Member State in which a conviction is handed down against a national of another Member State (the "convicting Member State") transmits the information on such a conviction to the Member State of the convicted person's nationality (the "Member State of the person's nationality")
The initial English version states that a Member State 'may transmit' the information.
The initial English version states that a Member State 'may transmit' the information.
However, this is not an option but an obligation.
However, this is not an option but an obligation.
Член 2, буква a)
Article 2, point (a)
a) "conviction" means any final decision of a criminal court or of an administrative authority whose decision can be appealed against before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters , establishing guilt of a criminal offence or an act punishable in accordance with national law as an offence against the law
a) "conviction" means any final decision of a criminal court or of an administrative authority whose decision can be appealed against before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters , establishing guilt of a criminal offence or an act punishable in accordance with national law as an offence against the law
a) „присъда“ означава всяко окончателно съдебно решение, с което се установява вина, чрез наказателно производство, за криминално престъпление съгласно национално право.
(a) “conviction” means any final court decision establishing guilt in criminal proceedings for a criminal offence under national law
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, each Member State shall designate a central authority.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, each Member State shall designate a central authority.
However, for the transmission of information under Article 4 and for replies to requests as referred to in Articles 6 and 7 , Member States may designate one or more central authorities.
However, for the transmission of information under Article 4 and for replies to requests as referred to in Articles 6 and 7 , Member States may designate one or more central authorities.
По смисъла на настоящето Рамково решение, всяка държава-членка определя централен орган.
For the purposes of this Framework Decision, each Member State shall designate a central authority.
При все това, с оглед предаването на информация по член 4 и предоставянето на отговори на искания за информация по член 7 , държавите-членки могат да определят един или повече централни органи.
However, for the transmission of information under Article 4 and for replies to requests for information under Article 7 , Member States may designate one or more central authorities.
Article 7 of the proposal specifies how requests for information should be replied to.
Article 7 of the proposal specifies how requests for information should be replied to.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure all convictions handed down within its territory are accompanied, when transmitted to the national criminal record, by the nationality of the convicted person if they are a national of another Member State.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure all convictions handed down within its territory are accompanied, when transmitted to the national criminal record, by the nationality of the convicted person if they are a national of another Member State.
Всяка държава-членка предприема необходимите мерки с оглед на това издадените на нейна територия присъди , след като вече са внесени в бюлетините за съдимост, да посочват, при вписването им в националния регистър за съдимост, гражданството или гражданствата на осъденото лице, ако то се явява гражданин на друга държава-членка.
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure all convictions handed down within its territory , after they have been entered in the criminal record, are accompanied, when transmitted to the national criminal record, by the nationality or nationalities of the convicted person if they are a national of another Member State.
The unamended article refers to the obligation to forward details of sentences, but does not mention the prior obligation to enter them in the register of criminal records of the Member States where the sentence was passed.
The unamended article refers to the obligation to forward details of sentences, but does not mention the prior obligation to enter them in the register of criminal records of the Member States where the sentence was passed.
It should also be taken into account that the convicted person may have more than one nationality.
It should also be taken into account that the convicted person may have more than one nationality.
Член 4, параграф 2, точка 2
Article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph 2
If the interested party is a national of several Member States, the relevant information shall be transmitted to each of these Member States, even if the convicted person is a national of the Member State within whose territory they have been convicted.
If the interested party is a national of several Member States, the relevant information shall be transmitted to each of these Member States, even if the convicted person is a national of the Member State within whose territory they have been convicted.
Ако е общоизвестен факт, че осъденото лице е гражданин на няколко държави-членки, съответната информация се предава на всяка една от въпросните държави-членки, дори и осъденото лице да е гражданин на държавата-членка, на чиято територия то е осъдено.
If the interested party is known to be a national of several Member States, the relevant information shall be transmitted to each of these Member States, even if the convicted person is a national of the Member State within whose territory they have been convicted.