natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Личните данни, предоставяни по член 7, параграфи 1 и 4 за целите на наказателното производство, могат да бъдат използвани от молещата държава-членка в съответствие с принципите, посочени в параграф -1, и изключително за целите на конкретното наказателно производство, за което са поискани, в съответствие с приложения формуляр.
Personal data provided under Article 7(1) and (4) for the purposes of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State in accordance with the principles referred to in paragraph -1 and exclusively for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for, in accordance with the annexed form.
Член 9 – параграф 2
Article 9 – paragraph 2
Личните данни, предоставяни по член 7, параграфи 2 и 4 за цели, различни от тези на наказателното производство, могат да бъдат използвани от молещата държава-членка в съответствие с нейното национално законодателство единствено и само за целта, заради която са поискани, и в определените от замолената държава-членка граници, посочени в съответния формуляр.
Personal data provided under Article 7(2) and (4) for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State, in accordance with its national law , solely for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for and within the limits set out by the requested Member State in the relevant form.
Личните данни, предоставяни по член 7, параграфи 2 и 4 за цели, различни от тези на наказателното производство, могат да бъдат използвани от молещата държава-членка в съответствие с нейното национално законодателство и с принципите, посочени в параграф -1 и изключително за целта, заради която са поискани, и в определените от замолената държава-членка граници, посочени в съответния формуляр.
Personal data provided under Article 7(2) and (4) for any purposes other than that of criminal proceedings may be used by the requesting Member State, in accordance with its national law and with the principles referred to in paragraph -1 and exclusively for the purposes of the particular proceedings they were requested for and within the limits set out by the requested Member State in the relevant form.
Член 9 – параграф 3
Article 9 – paragraph 3
Независимо от параграфи 1 и 2, личните данни, предоставяни по реда на член 7, параграфи 1, 2 и 4, могат да бъдат използвани от молещата държава-членка с цел предотвратяване на непосредствена и сериозна заплаха за обществената сигурност.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, personal data provided under Article 7(1), (2) and (4) may be used by the requesting Member State for preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security.
Независимо от параграфи 1 и 2, личните данни, предоставяни по реда на член 7, параграфи 1, 2 и 4, могат да бъдат използвани от молещата държава-членка , ако това използване е необходимо и пропорционално с цел предотвратяване на непосредствена и сериозна заплаха за обществената сигурност; в този случай, държавата-членка, отправила искането, предоставя на държавата-членка, към която е отправено искането, последващо уведомление, в което се посочва изпълнението на условията за необходимост, пропорционалност, неотложност и сериозност на заплахата.
Notwithstanding paragraphs 1 and 2, personal data provided under Article 7(1), (2) and (4) may be used by the requesting Member State if such use is necessary and proportionate for the purpose of preventing an immediate and serious threat to public security; in such a case, the requesting Member State shall provide the requested Member State with an ex post notification setting out the fulfilment of the conditions of necessity, proportionality, urgency and seriousness of the threat .
Член 9 – параграф 4
Article 9 – paragraph 4
Държавите-членки предприемат необходимите мерки, за да гарантират, че личните данни, получени от друга държава-членка по реда на член 4, ако бъдат предадени на трета държава в съответствие с член 7, параграф 3, са обект на същите ограничения при използване, като тези приложими в молещата държава-членка в съответствие с параграфи 2 от настоящия член.
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that personal data received from another Member State under Article 4, if transmitted to a third State in accordance with Article 7 paragraph 3, are subject to the same usage restrictions as those applicable in a requesting Member State according to paragraphs 2 of this Article.
Държавите-членки посочват изрично, че личните данни, ако бъдат предадени на трета държава с цел наказателно производство, могат да бъдат използвани по-нататък от тази държава единствено за целите на наказателното производство.
Member States shall specify that personal data, if transmitted to a third State for the purpose of a criminal proceeding, may be further used by that State only for the purposes of criminal proceedings.
Освен това държавите-членки предприемат необходимите мерки, за да гарантират, че личните данни, получени от друга държава-членка по реда на член 4, ако бъдат предадени на трета държава в съответствие с член 7, параграф 3, са обект на същите ограничения при използване, като тези приложими в молещата държава-членка в съответствие с параграфи 2 от настоящия член.
In addition, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that personal data received from another Member State under Article 4, if transmitted to a third State in accordance with Article 7 paragraph 3, are subject to the same usage restrictions as those applicable in a requesting Member State according to paragraphs 2 of this Article.
Член 9 – параграф 5
Article 9 – paragraph 5
Настоящият член не се прилага за лични данни, получени от държава-членка по силата на настоящото рамково решение, когато те са с произход от същата държава-членка.
This article does not apply to personal data obtained by a Member State under this Framework Decision and originating from that Member State.
Параграфи 1 до 4 не се прилагат за лични данни, получени от държава-членка по силата на настоящото рамково решение, когато те са с произход от същата държава-членка.
Paragraphs 1 to 4 shall not apply to personal data obtained by a Member State under this Framework Decision and originating from that Member State.
Член 9 – параграф 5а (нов)
Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Всяка държава-членка следва да осигури систематичното информиране на националните си органи за защита на данните относно обмена на лични данни съгласно настоящото рамково решение, и по-специално за използването на лични данни при обстоятелствата, посочени в член 9, параграф 3.
Each Member State shall ensure that its national data protection authorities are systematically informed of the exchange of personal data under this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the use of personal data in the circumstances referred to in Article 9(3).
Органите за защита на данните на държавите-членки контролират обмена, посочен в параграф 1, и си сътрудничат за тази цел.
The Member States' data protection authorities shall monitor the exchange referred to in paragraph 1 and cooperate with one another for that purpose.
Член 9a (нов)
Article 9 a (new)
Субектът на данни следва да бъде информиран за факта, че се обработват лични данни, отнасящи се до него.
A data subject shall be informed of the fact that personal data concerning him or her are being processed.
Субектът на данни има право да получи без неоснователно забавяне информацията, предмет на обработваните данни, на разбираем за него език, както и да иска поправка и, при необходимост, заличаване на данни, чиято обработка е в нарушение на залегналите в член 9, параграф -1 принципи.
A data subject shall have the right to obtain without undue delay the information as to which data are being processed in a language which he or she understands, as well as to rectify and, where appropriate, erase data processed in breach of the principles referred to in Article 9(-1).
Информацията, посочена в параграф 1, може да бъде отказана или забавена, ако това е абсолютно необходимо:
The information referred to in paragraph 1 may be refused or delayed if strictly necessary in order:
в) за да не се възпрепятства разследването и наказателното преследване на престъпления и нарушения; и
(c) not to hamper the investigation and prosecution of criminal offences;
г) за да се защитят правата и гаранциите на трети страни.
(d) to protect the rights and guarantees of third parties.
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква а – точка iv а (нова)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new)
iv а) информация за наказанията лишаване от право да се упражнява професия в резултат на наказателната присъда.
(iv a) information on disqualifications arising from a criminal conviction,
Член 11 – параграф 1 – буква б – точка iv
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iv
iv) информация за наказанията лишаване от право да се упражнява професия в резултат на наказателната присъда.
(iv) information on disqualifications arising from a criminal conviction,
On 22 December 2005 the Commission published its proposal for a Framework Decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from criminal records.
On 22 December 2005 the Commission published its proposal for a Framework Decision on the organisation and content of the exchange of information extracted from criminal records.
The purpose of the proposal is to improve communication between the judicial authorities and to ensure that requests for information from the Member States concerning criminal records are replied to properly and in a comprehensive, exhaustive fashion.
The purpose of the proposal is to improve communication between the judicial authorities and to ensure that requests for information from the Member States concerning criminal records are replied to properly and in a comprehensive, exhaustive fashion.
The main topics dealt with in the proposal are:
The main topics dealt with in the proposal are:
The obligation for the Member State of conviction to transmit immediately to the Member State of nationality full information concerning the convictions handed down on its nationals.
The obligation for the Member State of conviction to transmit immediately to the Member State of nationality full information concerning the convictions handed down on its nationals.
Obligation for the Member State of nationality to store and update all information received.
Obligation for the Member State of nationality to store and update all information received.
Conditions and procedure for replying to a request for information concerning a criminal record.
Conditions and procedure for replying to a request for information concerning a criminal record.
On 6 February 2008 the EU Council decided to consult the European Parliament again.
On 6 February 2008 the EU Council decided to consult the European Parliament again.
Further consultation is justified in view of the major changes which have been made to the original text and in particular the incorporation of some of Parliament's proposals and the Kingdom of Belgium's initiative concerning the recognition and enforcement of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children.
Further consultation is justified in view of the major changes which have been made to the original text and in particular the incorporation of some of Parliament's proposals and the Kingdom of Belgium's initiative concerning the recognition and enforcement of prohibitions arising from convictions for sexual offences committed against children.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that many of the proposals contained in Parliament’s 21 June 2007 report have been accepted.
The rapporteur welcomes the fact that many of the proposals contained in Parliament’s 21 June 2007 report have been accepted.
However, attention must be drawn to the proposal for a single legal framework for the protection of personal data which is identical to the one originally formulated by the Commission; since Parliament’s initiatives in this field have not been taken into account, further amendments will have to be tabled.
However, attention must be drawn to the proposal for a single legal framework for the protection of personal data which is identical to the one originally formulated by the Commission; since Parliament’s initiatives in this field have not been taken into account, further amendments will have to be tabled.
The rapporteur also regrets the fact that the Council has chosen to establish a dual system as regards convictions handed down in a Member State other than the Member State of which the convicted person is a national (one system would be used in the domestic sphere and the second would be used in the other Member States to which information relating to convictions is to be transmitted).
The rapporteur also regrets the fact that the Council has chosen to establish a dual system as regards convictions handed down in a Member State other than the Member State of which the convicted person is a national (one system would be used in the domestic sphere and the second would be used in the other Member States to which information relating to convictions is to be transmitted).
A dual system of this kind would only make the difficult task of transmitting information more complex and more confusing - a factor which justifies retention of the system originally proposed by the Commission, pursuant to which any change to or deletion of a criminal record in the Member State of conviction would require the same amendment or deletion to be carried out in the Member State of which the person convicted is a national.
A dual system of this kind would only make the difficult task of transmitting information more complex and more confusing - a factor which justifies retention of the system originally proposed by the Commission, pursuant to which any change to or deletion of a criminal record in the Member State of conviction would require the same amendment or deletion to be carried out in the Member State of which the person convicted is a national.
We must draw attention to certain aspects of the proposal which should perhaps be considered thoroughly by the Council and the Member States.
We must draw attention to certain aspects of the proposal which should perhaps be considered thoroughly by the Council and the Member States.
There is alarming evidence to the effect that sexual delinquents and other extremely dangerous individuals benefit from the lack of an effective information-exchange system and take advantage of the limits imposed on the EU’s current powers.
There is alarming evidence to the effect that sexual delinquents and other extremely dangerous individuals benefit from the lack of an effective information-exchange system and take advantage of the limits imposed on the EU’s current powers.
The proposed legal framework determines who may request information relating to convictions.
The proposed legal framework determines who may request information relating to convictions.
In brief, requests may be submitted either by the interested party or by the Member States’ central authorities.
In brief, requests may be submitted either by the interested party or by the Member States’ central authorities.
However, there are highly specific cases in which certain public or private bodies should be able to find out whether persons whom they intend to employ (or whom they already employ) have a criminal record.
However, there are highly specific cases in which certain public or private bodies should be able to find out whether persons whom they intend to employ (or whom they already employ) have a criminal record.
We are referring here to educational or childcare institutions.
We are referring here to educational or childcare institutions.
It is not sufficient for educational or childcare establishments (be they public or private) to require as part of the selection process that various documents be submitted as proof of the candidates' stated experience, skills and training; those establishments must be able to (and must in practice) insist that applicants submit a certificate concerning their criminal record, together with their other documents.
It is not sufficient for educational or childcare establishments (be they public or private) to require as part of the selection process that various documents be submitted as proof of the candidates' stated experience, skills and training; those establishments must be able to (and must in practice) insist that applicants submit a certificate concerning their criminal record, together with their other documents.
However, a procedure such as the one described in the above paragraph would not be sufficient to guarantee the safety of children.
However, a procedure such as the one described in the above paragraph would not be sufficient to guarantee the safety of children.
Educational establishments must be able to find out whether their staff (i.e. existing employees) have a criminal record relating to sexual offences against children.
Educational establishments must be able to find out whether their staff (i.e. existing employees) have a criminal record relating to sexual offences against children.
Hence it would be desirable if such establishments, whilst fully upholding fundamental rights and observing the principles of personal-data protection, could request and secure access to information in cases in which the individuals concerned do indeed have a criminal record relating to offences committed against children.
Hence it would be desirable if such establishments, whilst fully upholding fundamental rights and observing the principles of personal-data protection, could request and secure access to information in cases in which the individuals concerned do indeed have a criminal record relating to offences committed against children.
Обмен на информация, получена от регистрите за съдимост, между държавите-членки
Exchanges between the Member States of information extracted from the criminal record
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Philip Bradbourn, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Martine Roure, Csaba Sógor, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Alexander Alvaro, Emine Bozkurt, Philip Bradbourn, Mihael Brejc, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, Michael Cashman, Giusto Catania, Jean-Marie Cavada, Carlos Coelho, Panayiotis Demetriou, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Bárbara Dührkop Dührkop, Claudio Fava, Armando França, Urszula Gacek, Patrick Gaubert, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Lívia Járóka, Ewa Klamt, Stavros Lambrinidis, Henrik Lax, Roselyne Lefrançois, Claude Moraes, Martine Roure, Csaba Sógor, Manfred Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Genowefa Grabowska, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Syed Kamall, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Marianne Mikko, Bill Newton Dunn, Nicolae Vlad Popa
Edit Bauer, Simon Busuttil, Genowefa Grabowska, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Syed Kamall, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Marianne Mikko, Bill Newton Dunn, Nicolae Vlad Popa
Mihael Brejc
Mihael Brejc
PE 405.724v02-00
PE 405.724v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Европейския парламент и до Съвета ( COM(2008)0101 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0101 ),
– като взе предвид член 251, параграф 2 и член 62, параграф 2, буква a) от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които предложението е внесено от Комисията ( C6‑0086/2008 ),
– having regard to Articles 251(2) and 62(2)(a) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6‑0086/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0208/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6‑0208/2008 ),
Член 1 – точка 1
Article 1 – point 1
Член 7 – параграф 3 – точка a a - алинея 1 а (нова)
Article 7 - paragraph 3 – point a a – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Чрез дерогация, справка във ВИС може да се извърши като се използва само номерът на виза стикера или, на случайна основа, номерът на виза стикера в съчетание с проверка на пръстовите отпечатъци.
By way of derogation, the VIS may be consulted using the number of the visa sticker only or, on a random basis, the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints.
За да се приложи тази дерогация трябва да са изпълнени следните условия:
The following conditions must be satisfied in order for this derogation to apply:
i) възниква движение с такъв интензитет, че времето за чакане на гранично-пропускателния пункт става прекалено дълго,
i) when traffic of such intensity arises that the waiting time at the border crossing point becomes excessive,
ii) всички ресурси по отношение на персонал, устройства и организация са изчерпани,
ii) all resources have already been exhausted in terms of staff, facilities and organisation,
iii) извършена е оценка, че не съществува риск по отношение на вътрешната сигурност и нелегалната имиграция.
iii) an assessment has been made that there is no risk related to internal security and illegal immigration.
Все пак, във всички случаи на съмнение относно самоличността на притежателя на визата и/или относно автентичността на визата, се извършва справка във ВИС, като се използва номера на виза стикера в съчетание с проверка на пръстовите отпечатъци.
However, in all cases where there is any doubt as to the identity of the holder of the visa and/or the authenticity of the visa, the VIS shall be consulted using the number of the visa sticker in combination with the verification of fingerprints.
Решението да се извърши справка във ВИС в съответствие с алинея 1 се взема на равнище най-малко командващ граничен служител на гранично-пропускателен пункт.
The decision to consult the VIS in accordance with subparagraph 1 shall be taken at least at the level of the border guard in command at the border crossing point.
Всяка държава-членка предава на Европейския парламент и на Комисията веднъж годишно доклад за прилагането на този член, който следва да съдържа броя на гражданите на трети държави, за които е извършена справка във ВИС само чрез използване на номера на виза стикера.
Each Member State shall transmit once a year a report on the application of this Article to the European Parliament and the Commission, which should include the number of third country nationals, who were checked in VIS using the number of the visa sticker only.
Три години след датата на влизане в сила на настоящия регламент, Комисията предава на Европейския парламент и на Съвета оценка на прилагането на този член.
Three years after the date of application of this Regulation, the Commission shall transmit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of the implementation of this Article.
На основата на тази оценка Европейският парламент или Съветът може да отправи покана към Комисията, при необходимост да предложи подходящи изменения на настоящия регламент.
On the basis of that evaluation, the European Parliament or the Council may invite the Commission to propose, if necessary, appropriate amendments to this Regulation.
The European Parliament is involved in the codecision procedure to amend Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code.
The European Parliament is involved in the codecision procedure to amend Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards the use of the Visa Information System (VIS) under the Schengen Borders Code.