natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The Parliament supported the Commission proposal which gives a clear earmarking of the revenues and we added some substantial points to the Commission proposal like reducing taxes on environmental transport modes and investment in research for technology for clean aircraft.
The Parliament supported the Commission proposal which gives a clear earmarking of the revenues and we added some substantial points to the Commission proposal like reducing taxes on environmental transport modes and investment in research for technology for clean aircraft.
The Council ignored the amendment of the Parliament and explicitly stressed that no kind of earmarking will be accepted.
The Council ignored the amendment of the Parliament and explicitly stressed that no kind of earmarking will be accepted.
The rapporteur is fully aware of the political dimension of this question for the Finance Ministers.
The rapporteur is fully aware of the political dimension of this question for the Finance Ministers.
On the other hand the Parliament's position is more than justified for legal and political reasons.
On the other hand the Parliament's position is more than justified for legal and political reasons.
Especially the following arguments motivate the rapporteur to retable Parliament's first reading amendment:
Especially the following arguments motivate the rapporteur to retable Parliament's first reading amendment:
If the result of the scheme is only an increase of the income for the Finance Ministers and those citizens that behave environmental-friendly, e.g. by using the bus or train instead of the plane, have no benefit, it is more difficult to justify the policy.
If the result of the scheme is only an increase of the income for the Finance Ministers and those citizens that behave environmental-friendly, e.g. by using the bus or train instead of the plane, have no benefit, it is more difficult to justify the policy.
Tax cuts on environmental-friendly transport modes would be crucial to convince citizens that we are not collecting money but supporting environmental activities.
Tax cuts on environmental-friendly transport modes would be crucial to convince citizens that we are not collecting money but supporting environmental activities.
The same logic applies for investment in research and technology for clean aircrafts.
The same logic applies for investment in research and technology for clean aircrafts.
The impression that the scheme mainly collects money for the Finance Ministers and does not address the real problem needs to be avoided.
The impression that the scheme mainly collects money for the Finance Ministers and does not address the real problem needs to be avoided.
Изменение на Директива 2003/87/ЕО с цел включване на авиационни дейности в схемата за търговия с квоти за емисии на парникови газове в рамките на Общността
Amendment of Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community
13.11.2007 г. T6-0505/2007
13.11.2007 T6-0505/2007
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Adamos Adamou, Georgs Andrejevs, Pilar Ayuso, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Dorette Corbey, Chris Davies, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Alessandro Foglietta, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Evangelia Tzampazi, Thomas Ulmer, Marcello Vernola, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Inés Ayala Sender, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Gaľa, Umberto Guidoni, Johannes Lebech, Caroline Lucas, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bart Staes, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Inés Ayala Sender, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Milan Gaľa, Umberto Guidoni, Johannes Lebech, Caroline Lucas, Miroslav Mikolášik, Bart Staes, Lambert van Nistelrooij
PE 406.022v02-00
PE 406.022v02-00
– като взе предвид предложението за решение на Съвета ( COM(2008)0132 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0132 ),
– като взе предвид Протокола за стратегическа екологична оценка към Конвенцията на ИКЕ на ООН за оценка на въздействието върху околната среда в трансграничен контекст, подписана в Еспо през 1991 г.,
– having regard to the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context,
– като взе предвид член 175, параграф 1 и член 300, параграф 2, алинея първа, изречение първо от Договора за ЕО,
– having regard to Article 175(1) and Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence of the EC Treaty,
– като взе предвид член 300, параграф 3, алинея 1 от Договора за ЕО, съобразно която Съветът се е консултирал с него ( C6‑0161/2008 ),
– having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0161/2008 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните ( A6‑0221/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6‑0221/2008 ),
The fifth Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe held" in Kiev, Ukraine in May 2003 adopted the Protocol on Strategic Environmental assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in Transboundary Context (SEA Protocol).
The fifth Ministerial Conference "Environment for Europe held" in Kiev, Ukraine in May 2003 adopted the Protocol on Strategic Environmental assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in Transboundary Context (SEA Protocol).
The Commission on behalf of the European Community signed the SEA Protocol on 21 May 2003.
The Commission on behalf of the European Community signed the SEA Protocol on 21 May 2003.
The 1991 UN/ECE Convention on transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (the Espoo Convention), building on existing EIA law, established procedures for consulting Parties likely to be affected by transboundary environmental impacts of proposed projects.
The 1991 UN/ECE Convention on transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment (the Espoo Convention), building on existing EIA law, established procedures for consulting Parties likely to be affected by transboundary environmental impacts of proposed projects.
The Convention entered into force in 1997.
The Convention entered into force in 1997.
The European Community signed it on 26 February 1991 and ratified in on 24 June 1997.
The European Community signed it on 26 February 1991 and ratified in on 24 June 1997.
Its main provisions are implemented by Directive 97/11.
Its main provisions are implemented by Directive 97/11.
Directive 2001/42/EC, on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive), applies to a broad category of plans and programmes, and sets out detailed requirements for assessing and reporting on their environmental effects.
Directive 2001/42/EC, on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive), applies to a broad category of plans and programmes, and sets out detailed requirements for assessing and reporting on their environmental effects.
The ability to adverse environmental effects at project level may be constrained by decisions taken in plans or policies.
The ability to adverse environmental effects at project level may be constrained by decisions taken in plans or policies.
For this reason, it has been established that a process of assessment should be carried out these levels.
For this reason, it has been established that a process of assessment should be carried out these levels.
This is the SEA- process.
This is the SEA- process.
The SEA - Directive includes a provision on transboundary effects inspired by the Espoo Convention.
The SEA - Directive includes a provision on transboundary effects inspired by the Espoo Convention.
The SEA - Protocol's objectives are to provide for a high level of protection of the environment, including health, and to ensure that these concerns are integrated into measures and instruments designed to ensure sustainable development.
The SEA - Protocol's objectives are to provide for a high level of protection of the environment, including health, and to ensure that these concerns are integrated into measures and instruments designed to ensure sustainable development.
The European Community, in conformity with its Strategy on Sustainable Development and Better Regulation, intends to implement Article 13 of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Espoo Convention through the impact assessment procedures set out in the Communications on Impact Assessment, which address in a balanced manner the economic, social and environmental components of sustainable development.
The European Community, in conformity with its Strategy on Sustainable Development and Better Regulation, intends to implement Article 13 of the Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the Espoo Convention through the impact assessment procedures set out in the Communications on Impact Assessment, which address in a balanced manner the economic, social and environmental components of sustainable development.
Several aspects of the EU dimension deserve consideration.
Several aspects of the EU dimension deserve consideration.
The EC and the Member States have been among the leaders in developing the concept and practice of the SEA and they should confirm their support by ratifying the Protocol on Strategic Assessment to the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context.
The EC and the Member States have been among the leaders in developing the concept and practice of the SEA and they should confirm their support by ratifying the Protocol on Strategic Assessment to the Espoo Convention on environmental impact assessment in a transboundary context.
Протокол относно стратегическата екологична оценка към Конвенцията за оценка на въздействието върху околната среда в трансграничен контекст, подписана в Еспоо през 1991 г.
Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment to the 1991 UN/ECE Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context
Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Georgs Andrejevs, Margrete Auken, Liam Aylward, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Martin Callanan, Magor Imre Csibi, Chris Davies, Avril Doyle, Mojca Drčar Murko, Edite Estrela, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Cristina Gutiérrez-Cortines, Satu Hassi, Gyula Hegyi, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Roberto Musacchio, Riitta Myller, Péter Olajos, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Guido Sacconi, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Bogusław Sonik, María Sornosa Martínez, Antonios Trakatellis, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Anders Wijkman, Glenis Willmott
Jo Leinen , комисия по конституционни въпроси
Jo Leinen , Committee on Constitutional Affairs
(*) Процедура с асоциирани комисии - член 47 от правилника
(*)Associated committee – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
PE 400.612v02-00
PE 400.612v02-00
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по правни въпроси и становището на комисията по конституционни въпроси ( A6‑0222/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6‑0222/2008 ),
А. като има предвид, че Европейският парламент не е юридически субект и в резултат често е възпрепятстван в защитата на своите прерогативи пред националните съдилища поради проблеми, произтичащи от специфичния му характер,
A. whereas the European Parliament has no legal personality; whereas, as a result, it is often impeded in protecting its prerogatives before national courts from problems that are peculiar to its special nature,
Б. като има предвид, че Парламентът уважава правото на инициатива на Комисията, но защитава своето собствено право съгласно член 192 от Договора за създаване на ЕО да изисква от Комисията да представя законодателни предложения,
B. whereas Parliament respects the right of initiative of the Commission but upholds its own right under Article 192 of the EC Treaty to request the Commission to submit legislative proposals,
В. като има предвид, че в това отношение Европейският парламент разполага с редица предвидени в Договора правни средства, които гарантират защитата на горепосочените прерогативи пред другите институции на Общността, като действия за установяване на неправомерно бездействие (чл. 232 от Договора за създаване на ЕО) или действия за отмяна на актове на Общността (чл. 230 от Договора за създаване на ЕО),
C. whereas in this regard the European Parliament has at its disposal a range of remedies under the Treaty which ensure that the aforementioned prerogatives are protected vis-à-vis the other Community institutions, such as actions for failure to act (Article 232 of the EC Treaty) and actions for the annulment of Community acts (Article 230 of the EC Treaty),
Г. като има предвид, че според съдебната практика на Съда на европейските общности една държава-членка носи отговорност за неспазване на задълженията си по Договорите, независимо от това кой е органът на тази държава, чието действие или бездействие е довело до това неспазване, дори в случай на институция, която по конституция е независима
D. whereas, under the case-law of the Court of Justice, a Member State incurs liability for failure to fulfil its obligations under the Treaties, whatever the agency of that State whose action or inaction has caused the failure, even in the case of a constitutionally independent institution
Д. като има предвид, че Европейският парламент все пак не разполага с равностойни преки инструменти за защита на своите прерогативи пред националните съдилища, най-вече в случай на решение, постановено от национална съдебна институция, което противоречи на прерогативите на Парламента, доколкото той не може нито да участва в национални съдебни производства, нито да сезира пряко Съда на Европейските общности, за да защити собствените си решения,
E. whereas, however, the European Parliament does not have the same direct instruments with which to defend its prerogatives before the national courts, especially in the event of a national judgment which runs counter to those prerogatives, since it can neither participate in national legal proceedings nor directly bring an action before the Court of Justice to defend its decisions,
Е. като има предвид, че Европейският парламент няма дори възможността като последно средство да образува производство за установяване на неизпълнение (в съответствие с чл. 226 от Договора за създаване на ЕО) срещу държава-членка, тъй като това правомощие принадлежи изключително на Комисията,
F. whereas the European Parliament cannot even initiate, as a last resort, infringement proceedings (under Article 226 of the EC Treaty) against a Member State, since only the Commission has the power to do so,
Ж. като има предвид, че липсата на подходящи инструменти за ефективна защита на собствените му решения може да попречи на ефективността на Европейския парламент в качеството му на политически и законодателен орган,
G. whereas the lack of appropriate instruments with which to defend its own decisions effectively can hamper the effectiveness of the European Parliament as a political and legislative body,
З. като има предвид, че принципите за лоялно сътрудничество между институциите на Европейския съюз и за добро управление изискват дейността на органите на Общността да бъде подчинена на прозрачност и разбираемост, така че причините, на които се основава приемането или неприемането на определено действие да бъдат явни,
H. whereas the principles of loyal cooperation between the institutions of the European Union and those of good administration call for the activity of Community bodies to be governed by rules of transparency and intelligibility in order to clarify the reasons for which a given action was or was not taken,
И. като има предвид, че с оглед разрешаването на гореизложените проблеми би било подходящо да се засилят средствата за защита на парламентарните прерогативи не чрез изменение на Договора за създаване на ЕО, а като се потърси начин от опита на националните парламенти да се извлекат средства за защита, подходящи за специфичните изисквания на Европейския парламент,
I. whereas, in order to obviate the above-mentioned problems, it would be advisable to strengthen the measures to protect parliamentary prerogatives not by amending the EC Treaty but by attempting to extrapolate from the experience of the national parliaments remedies that are appropriate to the specific requirements of the European Parliament,
Й. като има предвид, че резултатите от проведено за тази цел проучване, основано на широка представителна извадка държави-членки, ясно показват, че по-голямата част от националните законодателни системи предоставя на националните парламенти съдебни средства за защита, целящи да гарантират не само защитата на интересите на парламентарната асамблея в нейната цялост, но и тази на отделните й членове,
J. whereas the results of the study carried out to that end on a broad cross-section of Member States clearly show that most national legal orders grant their national parliaments legal remedies aimed at ensuring not only the defence of the interests of the parliament as a whole but also of each individual member,
К. като има предвид, че държавите-членки са подчинени на принципа на „искреното и лоялно сътрудничество”, закрепен в чл. 10 на Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, както и че в съответствие с тълкуването на Съда на Европейските общности самите държави-членки са задължени „да предвидят система от съдебни средства за защита и процедури, които да осигуряват зачитането на правото на ефективна съдебна защита”
K. whereas the Member States are subject to the principle of sincere and loyal cooperation enshrined in Article 10 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, and whereas, in the light of the case-law of the Court of Justice, those same Member States are required to ‘establish a system of legal remedies and procedures which ensure respect for the right to effective judicial protection’
Дело C-50/00P, Unión de Pequenos Agricultores срещу Съвета, Сборник 2002 г., стр. I-6677. ,
Case C-50/00P Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council ECR [2002] I-6677. ,
Л. като има предвид, че би било подходящо да се предоставят на Европейския парламент идентични или най-малкото аналогични инструменти за защита на собствените прерогативи пред съдебната власт, независимо дали тя се представлява от Съда на Европейските общности или от националните съдилища, по аналогия с инструментите на защита, предвидени в националните правни системи в полза на собствените парламенти,
L. whereas it would be opportune to grant the European Parliament similar, if not identical, instruments to protect its prerogatives vis-à-vis the judicial power, be that power represented by the Court of Justice or by the national courts, by analogy with the safeguards provided for by the national legal orders to the benefit of their national parliaments,
4. приканва водещата комисия да подготви изменение към член 121 от правилника, в което да включи всички процесуални практики пред всяко съдилище и да предвиди опростена процедура, която да се прилага пред Съда на Европейските общности при ускорено или спешно производство;
Asks the committee responsible to prepare an amendment to Rule 121 of the Rules of Procedure so as to cover all legal proceedings before any court and to provide for a simplified procedure for use where proceedings are brought before the Court of Justice under an expedited or urgent procedure;
The European Parliament has often found it – and still finds it – impossible to effectively protect the prerogatives which the Treaties and the European Court of Human Rights itself expressly grant it.
The European Parliament has often found it – and still finds it – impossible to effectively protect the prerogatives which the Treaties and the European Court of Human Rights itself expressly grant it.
There is therefore the risk that rights and powers that are enshrined at Community and European level remain on paper, without being effectively safeguarded.
There is therefore the risk that rights and powers that are enshrined at Community and European level remain on paper, without being effectively safeguarded.
Under the existing Treaties, therefore, it is necessary to seek out and enhance the means that Parliament can exploit with a view to genuinely protecting its own prerogatives which were established as a guarantee of its independence and functionality.
Under the existing Treaties, therefore, it is necessary to seek out and enhance the means that Parliament can exploit with a view to genuinely protecting its own prerogatives which were established as a guarantee of its independence and functionality.
At an abstract level, one of the instruments which can be used by the European Parliament in case of an infringement of its prerogatives is action for failure to act under Article 227 EC.
At an abstract level, one of the instruments which can be used by the European Parliament in case of an infringement of its prerogatives is action for failure to act under Article 227 EC.
In the event of an infringement of one of its rights that are protected by Community law, Parliament can call on the Commission to undertake infringement proceedings pursuant to Article 226 EC.
In the event of an infringement of one of its rights that are protected by Community law, Parliament can call on the Commission to undertake infringement proceedings pursuant to Article 226 EC.
In practice, however, this cannot ensure the full protection of Parliament’s prerogatives in that the decision on whether or not to start formal proceedings is left to the Commission’s discretion.
In practice, however, this cannot ensure the full protection of Parliament’s prerogatives in that the decision on whether or not to start formal proceedings is left to the Commission’s discretion.