natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Тези предложения се отнасят най-малко за следните сектори и източници на емисии, при които трябва да бъдат намалени емисиите от замърсители:
As a minimum, these proposals shall deal with the following sectors and emitters, in which emissions of pollutants must be reduced:
§ норми за всички съответни неподвижни инсталации, изпускащи замърсители, например включване в Директива 96/61/ЕО на горивни инсталации с топлинна мощност от 20 до 50 мегавата;
§ standards for all relevant stationary installations which emit pollutants, for example inclusion of combustion plants from 20 to 50 Megawatts in Directive 96/61/EC;
EURO VI за тежкотоварни превозни средства, мерки, координирани на равнището на Общността, имащи за цел да насърчат или задължат (на сушата) собствениците на кораби да намалят емисиите или да сключат споразумения за емисиите, изпускани от двигателите на корабите, под контрола на Международната морска организация;
§ standards for motorised vehicles or craft of all sizes and classes travelling by land, air and sea; e.g. EURO VI for heavy vehicles, measures coordinated at Community level to encourage or oblige (inland)ship owners to reduce emissions, or agreements on emissions from ships' engines under the auspices of IMO;
§ нови норми за отоплителните инсталации за домашна употреба;
§ new standards for domestic heating installations;
§ двигатели и строителни машини;
§ engines and construction machines;
§ селскостопански сектор (наред с другото, торене и животновъдство)
§ agriculture (inter alia fertilisation and livestock breeding).
На всеки пет години Комисията представя на Европейския парламент и на Съвета доклад за постигнатия напредък относно мерките, посочени в параграф 1, и прилагането им в държавите-членки.
Every five years, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a progress report on the measures referred to in paragraph 1 and their implementation in the Member States.
* Две години след влизането в сила на настоящата директива.
* T wo years after the entry into force of this Directive.
On 28 June 2007 under the German Presidency the Council has adopted the Common Position (CP) on the Ambient Air Quality Directive.
On 28 June 2007 under the German Presidency the Council adopted the Common Position (CP) on the Ambient Air Quality Directive.
Although there are some differences between the European Parliament's first reading and the Council text, almost half of the European Parliament's amendments adopted on 26 September 2006 in Strasbourg were taken on board either verbatim, in part or in spirit.
Although there are some differences between the European Parliament's first reading and the Council text, almost half of the European Parliament's amendments adopted on 26 September 2006 in Strasbourg were taken on board either verbatim, in part or in spirit.
The Council's CP endorses some key amendments originally proposed by the European Parliament:
The Council's CP endorses some key amendments originally proposed by the European Parliament:
· A target value for PM 2,5 in 2010 that will be replaced by a binding limit value in 2015;
· A target value for PM 2,5 in 2010 that will be replaced by a binding limit value in 2015;
· the possibility to postpone the attainment of limit values after the entry into force of the Directive;
· the possibility to postpone the attainment of limit values after the entry into force of the Directive;
· the principle that limit values should apply everywhere, but in certain locations compliance with limit values should not be assessed.
· the principle that limit values should apply everywhere, but in certain locations compliance with limit values should not be assessed.
Apart from these congruencies, there are major differences: The Council does not accept any changes to the provisions regarding the existing daily and yearly limit values of PM 10 in Annex XI and rejects the European Parliament's proposal to link any derogation with the adoption of additional Community measures on the sources of pollution.
Apart from these congruencies, there are major differences: The Council does not accept any changes to the provisions regarding the existing daily and yearly limit values of PM 10 in Annex XI and rejects the European Parliament's proposal to link any derogation with the adoption of additional Community measures on the sources of pollution.
Furthermore, although there is a clear consensus on the timetable for the introduction of PM 2,5 (target value in 2010, limit value in 2015), the Council opts for a less stringent value of 25µg/m 3 – instead of the 20 µg/m 3 proposed by the EP – for both values.
Furthermore, although there is a clear consensus on the timetable for the introduction of PM 2,5 (target value in 2010, limit value in 2015), the Council opts for a less stringent value of 25µg/m 3 – instead of the 20 µg/m 3 proposed by the EP – for both values.
Priorities for the European Parliament's second reading
Priorities for the European Parliament's second reading
The Committee is strongly committed to negotiate a second reading agreement under the Portuguese Presidency that ensures the adoption of the Air Quality directive as soon as possible but secures the main objective of the Parliament's position: More ambitious target and limit values combined with more flexibility, stronger measures at the source and long-term goals.
The Committee is strongly committed to negotiate a second reading agreement under the Portuguese Presidency that ensures the adoption of the Air Quality directive as soon as possible but secures the main objective of the Parliament's position: More ambitious target and limit values combined with more flexibility, stronger measures at the source and long-term goals.
PM 2,5 : The smallest particles have been identified by scientists as those posing a major threat to human health.
PM 2,5 : The smallest particles have been identified by scientists as those posing a major threat to human health.
Unlike the coarse fraction (PM 10 ) the smallest particles are emitted almost exclusively from anthropogenic sources: The Committee therefore adopted the amendments related to PM 2,5 and the review clause (Amendment 64) and calls to maintain the more stringent target and limit value of 20 µg/m 3 in 2010 and 2015 respectively (amendments 49 and 50) .
Unlike the coarse fraction (PM 10 ) the smallest particles are emitted almost exclusively from anthropogenic sources: The Committee therefore adopted the amendments related to PM 2,5 and the review clause (Amendment 64) and calls to maintain the more stringent target and limit value of 20 µg/m 3 in 2010 and 2015 respectively (amendments 49 and 50).
Although ambitious, this value should be legally binding and will likely be attained in most parts of Europe by 2015.
Although ambitious, this value should be legally binding and will likely be attained in most parts of Europe by 2015.
PM 10 : The Rapporteur has suggested not to re-table the amendments related to the provisions on PM 10 laid down in Annex XI, both the 33 µg/m 3 yearly limit value as well as on the 55 days derogation for the daily limit value.
PM 10 : The Rapporteur has suggested not to re-table the amendments related to the provisions on PM 10 laid down in Annex XI, both the 33 µg/m 3 yearly limit value as well as on the 55 days derogation for the daily limit value.
Council and Commission do not accept any changes of the existing limit values.
Council and Commission do not accept any changes of the existing limit values.
For both institutions any changes of the status quo are a clear "no go" and would most likely lead directly to Conciliation.
For both institutions any changes of the status quo are a clear "no go" and would most likely lead directly to Conciliation.
Flexibility: The Member States, especially in the densely populated and industrial regions in western and central Europe, have had severe difficulties until the present in implementing the directive and attaining the limit values, despite having taken efforts to improve air quality.
Flexibility: The Member States, especially in the densely populated and industrial regions in western and central Europe, have had severe difficulties until the present in implementing the directive and attaining the limit values, despite having taken efforts to improve air quality.
Therefore, more flexibility to attain the limit values is key for those Member States that have take all measures at all levels to reduce pollution: The Committee adopted in part the amendments related to the derogation periods and the postponement of deadlines for compliance with the limit values (amendments 7 and 81 of the first reading), but proposes to cut down the derogation period from "four plus two" to "three plus two" years in order to achieve a compromise with the Council.
Therefore, more flexibility to attain the limit values is key for those Member States that have take all measures at all levels to reduce pollution: The Committee adopted in part the amendments related to the derogation periods and the postponement of deadlines for compliance with the limit values (amendments 7 and 81 of the first reading), but proposes to cut down the derogation period from "four plus two" to "three plus two" years in order to achieve a compromise with the Council.
The Committee also stresses the importance of long-term measures and exposure-based air quality policies.
The Committee also stresses the importance of long-term measures and exposure-based air quality policies.
Short-term measures have often not been effective.
Short-term measures have often not been effective.
These measures should be voluntary and shall only be taken where they may have a positive effect to reduce pollution (amendments 35 and 36).
These measures should be voluntary and shall only be taken where they may have a positive effect to reduce pollution (amendments 35 and 36).
The EP text on Annex III on the assessment of compliance with the limit values (amendments 24 and 60) has also been retabled.
The EP text on Annex III on the assessment of compliance with the limit values (amendments 24 and 60) has also been retabled.
Measures at the source: Pollution must be reduced through compliance with the current legislation and new Community measures at the source.
Measures at the source: Pollution must be reduced through compliance with the current legislation and new Community measures at the source.
Community measures to tackle emissions have been delayed, as Euro VI for heavy vehicles or the revision of the NEC-Directive.
Community measures to tackle emissions have been delayed, as Euro VI for heavy vehicles or the revision of the NEC-Directive.
The new Annex XVIa should therefore be re-introduced (amendment 84).
The new Annex XVIa should therefore be re-introduced (amendment 84).
Nevertheless your Rapporteur does not re-table the parts of the text that link the derogation periods with the Community measures, rejected by the Council.
Nevertheless your Rapporteur does not re-table the parts of the text that link the derogation periods with the Community measures, rejected by the Council.
It is very difficult to demonstrate the link between the non entering into force of the Community measures with the non attainment of the limit values.
It is very difficult to demonstrate the link between the non entering into force of the Community measures with the non attainment of the limit values.
Other: Various amendments on technical provisions, endorsed by the European Parliament in first reading, have been retabled such as on mandatory modelling techniques (amendments 16 and 17); on the uniform application of the criteria for selecting sampling points (amendment 22); the diffusion of information to all stakeholders (amendments 37 and 39) and the date for Member States to comply with the directive (amendment 44) among other provisions.
Other: Various amendments on technical provisions, endorsed by the European Parliament in first reading, have been retabled such as on mandatory modelling techniques (amendments 16 and 17); on the uniform application of the criteria for selecting sampling points (amendment 22); the diffusion of information to all stakeholders (amendments 37 and 39) and the date for Member States to comply with the directive (amendment 44) among other provisions.
Качество на атмосферния въздух и по-чист въздух за Европа
Ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe
26.9.2006 T6-0362/2006
26.9.2006 T6-0362/2006
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber
Adamos Adamou, Margrete Auken, Pilar Ayuso, Irena Belohorská, Johannes Blokland, John Bowis, Frieda Brepoels, Hiltrud Breyer, Martin Callanan, Dorette Corbey, Jill Evans, Anne Ferreira, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jens Holm, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Caroline Jackson, Dan Jørgensen, Christa Klaß, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Holger Krahmer, Urszula Krupa, Aldis Kušķis, Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Peter Liese, Jules Maaten, Linda McAvan, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Guido Sacconi, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Karin Scheele, Carl Schlyter, Richard Seeber, Kathy Sinnott, Antonios Trakatellis, Thomas Ulmer, Anja Weisgerber
Jerzy Buzek, Miroslav Mikolášik, Hartmut Nassauer, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Jerzy Buzek, Miroslav Mikolášik, Hartmut Nassauer, Lambert van Nistelrooij
Manuel Medina Ortega, Alexander Lambsdorff, Vincenzo Aita
Manuel Medina Ortega, Alexander Lambsdorff, Vincenzo Aita
относно обновената политика на ЕС в областта на туризма: към по-силно партньорство за европейски туризъм
on a renewed EU Tourism Policy: Towards a stronger partnership for European Tourism
PE 382.419v03-00
PE 382.419v03-00
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по култура и образование ..............................25
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................14
СТАНОВИЩЕ на комисията по регионално развитие ..................................29
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................18
РЕЗУЛТАТ ОТ ОКОНЧАТЕЛНОТО ГЛАСУВАНЕ В КОМИСИЯ...................................34
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................22
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията от 17 март 2006 г., озаглавено „обновената политика на ЕС в областта на туризма: към по-силно партньорство за европейски туризъм“ ( COM(2006)0134 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 17 March 2006 entitled ‘A renewed EU Tourism Policy: Towards a stronger partnership for European Tourism’ ( COM(2006)0134 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисията по транспорт и туризъм и становищата на комисията по култура и образование и комисията по регионално развитие ( A6‑0399/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Culture and Education and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6‑0399/2007 ),
A. като има предвид, че туризмът веднъж е упоменат в Договора за създаване на ЕО като дейност, която може да подлежи на „мерки” (член 3 от Договора за създаване на Европейската общност), но не се предполага, че попада в компетенциите на ЕС, нито да е сред политиките на ЕС;
A. whereas tourism is mentioned once in the EC Treaty as an activity that can be subject to "measures" (Article 3 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), but is not understood to fall within the EU's competence or to be EU policy area;
Б. като има предвид обаче, че е от компетенцията на Европейската общност да предприема мерки, за да гарантира ефикасното функциониране на вътрешния пазар, включително на туристическите услуги (член 95 от Договора за създаване на Европейската общност), като подходът за защита на потребителите е особено уместен в този контекст;
B. whereas the EC has a competence, however, to take measures to ensure the efficient functioning of the internal market, including tourism services (Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community), the consumer protection approach being a particularly relevant approach in this context;
В. като има предвид, че туристическият сектор се намира в пресечната точка на много политики на ЕС, които имат съществено отражение върху неговата ефикасност и възможност да допринася за растежа, заетостта и за социалното и териториално сближаване,
C. whereas the tourism sector is at the crossroads of numerous EU policies that have a substantial impact on its efficiency and its capacity to contribute to growth, employment and social and territorial cohesion,
Г. като има предвид, че въпреки че Парламентът определи ръководните принципи на устойчивата европейска политика в областта на туризма в горепосочената си резолюция, следва да се обърне внимание на някои от аспектите на тази политика, за да се приведат в действителност по-бързо;
D. whereas, notwithstanding the fact that Parliament, in its abovementioned resolution, spelled out the guiding principles for a European sustainable tourism policy, some individual aspects of that policy should be stressed to enable them to be translated into reality more speedily;
Д. като има предвид, че групата за устойчивост на туризма публикува наскоро доклад относно основните насоки, които ще послужат като база за Комисията при изготвянето на бъдещата програма за устойчивост на европейския туризъм (предходната „Програма 21”);
E. whereas the Tourism Sustainability Group has recently published a report laying down guidelines that will serve as a basis for the Commission when it draws up the future European tourism sustainability agenda (formerly Agenda 21);
Е. като има предвид, че не беше възможно да се разработи последователен комплексен подход за туризма на равнище ЕС, което доведе до затруднения и недостатъчно развитие на този сектор, както и до нарастваща опасност от загуба на пазарния дял на Европа в този сектор;
F. whereas it has not been possible to develop a consistent cross-policy approach to tourism at EU level, resulting in drawbacks and the insufficient development of this sector as well as increasing the risk of Europe losing its market share in this sector;
Ж. като има предвид, че екологичното и социално измерение на туризма трябва да бъде силно подчертано в интерес на устойчивостта;
G. whereas the environmental and social dimension of tourism needs to be strongly emphasised in the interest of sustainability;
З. като има предвид, че положението в някои известни европейски туристически дестинации се влошава и там се случват бурни и размирни инциденти , които ги правят по-малко привлекателни;
H. whereas the situation in certain popular European tourist destinations is deteriorating and riotous and violent incidents occur in these destinations, which render them less attractive;
И. като има предвид, че бяха предприети мерки от държавите-членки по време на Европейския съвет в Брюксел на 21 и 22 юни 2007 г., за да се включи по-специално туризмът в следващото преразглеждане на Договора за създаване на ЕО; настоява за значението на една нова правна основа в първичното законодателство, за да се поставят въпроси, които засягат този сектор в цяла Европа;
I. whereas steps have been taken by the Member States in the Brussels European Council of 21 and 22 June 2007 to include, in particular, tourism in the next revision of the EC Treaty; insists on the importance of having a new legal basis in primary law in order to address issues affecting this sector throughout Europe;
Й. като има предвид, че следва да се подчертае важната роля, която може да играе туризмът за насърчаване на социалното включване и интеграция на най-необлагодетелстваните групи от населението;
J. whereas the important role which tourism can play in promoting the social inclusion and integration of the most disadvantaged population groups should be stressed;
Туризъм и визова политика на ЕС
Tourism and EU Visa policy
12. приветства инициативата за модернизиране на работната рамка чрез еднаквото прилагане на нов регламент в ЕС; отбелязва, че тази реформа следва да се проведе бързо;
Welcomes the initiative to modernise the framework through a new Regulation to be implemented uniformly across the EU; points out that this reform should be carried out swiftly;
Хармонизиране на стандартите за качество при туристическо настаняване в Европа
Harmonisation of quality standards for tourist accommodation in Europe
20. счита, че е препоръчително и възможно да се изготви обща база и общи критерии за потребителите, за да могат те да направят избор въз основа на ясни и проверими критерии за класификация, когато решат да пътуват в чужбина;
Considers it advisable and possible to establish a common ground and common criteria for customers in order that they be able to make a choice, on the basis of clear and verifiable classification criteria, when they decide to travel abroad,;
- да продължи стандартизирането на ключовите аспекти на различните класификационни системи и усилията си за сближаване на тези системи, без да се разрушават съществуващите, което би било в ущърб на потребителите и на индустрията;
- continue its benchmarking of the key aspects of the various classification systems and pursue its efforts to bring these systems closer to one another, without disruption to existing systems, which would be to the detriment of consumers and of industry;
- да продължи усилията си за улесняване на разбирането на понятието „звезди” в различните държави-членки;
- pursue its efforts to facilitate the understanding of the meaning of “stars” in the different Member States;
- да информира редовно институциите на Общността за постигнатия напредък;
- inform regularly the Community institutions of progress made;
Системи за управление на качеството
Quality management schemes
43. приканва Комисията да опрости процедурите на анализ на опасностите и контрол в критични точки (НАССР) и да отчете нуждите на малките предприятия, с по-специално внимание на микропредприятия;
Calls on the Commission to simplify procedures for hazard analysis critical control points (HACCP) and to take account of the needs of small businesses, with particular regard to micro-businesses;
Здравен туризъм
Health tourism
45. подчертава, че застрахователният сектор трябва да играе по-голяма роля за подпомагане на здравния туризъм; освен това подчертава, че застрахователният сектор следва да бъде подкрепен при намирането на решения за финансиране на здравния туризъм при трансгранично сътрудничество.
Stresses that businesses in the insurance sector must play a greater role in supporting health-related tourism; in addition, emphasises that businesses in the insurance sector should be given support in relation to finding solutions for trans-boundary cooperation to finance health-related tourism.
Достъпен туризъм
Accessible tourism
Социален, икономически екологично устойчив туризъм
Socially, economically and environmentally sustainable tourism
54. приветства факта, че в горепосоченото съобщение Комисията изрично приканва за насърчаване на устойчивостта в туризма и подчертава, че социалната, икономическа и екологична устойчивост е основно условие за развитието и поддържането на всяка туристическа дейност;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission, in its abovementioned communication, expressly calls for the promotion of sustainability in tourism, and stresses that social, economic and environmental sustainability is a fundamental prerequisite for the development and maintenance of any tourist activity;