natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The EP is also satisfied with the response of the Council to its demands that it shares details on Troika's meetings relevant to export controls and on ad hoc workshops and seminars with countries such as China and countries in the Western Balkans on conventional arms export controls.
The EP is also satisfied with the response of the Council to its demands that it shares details on Troika's meetings relevant to export controls and on ad hoc workshops and seminars with countries such as China and countries in the Western Balkans on conventional arms export controls.
It recommends that parliamentarians should be invited to such seminars as observers and it supports the full implementation of key priorities for outreach activities.
It recommends that parliamentarians should be invited to such seminars as observers and it supports the full implementation of key priorities for outreach activities.
Arms brokering
Arms brokering
On 25 June 2003 the EU introduced a Common Position on Arms Brokering.
On 25 June 2003 the EU introduced a Common Position on Arms Brokering.
Arms brokers are those who mediate transfers of arms by bringing together buyers and sellers or who otherwise facilitate arms transfers.
Arms brokers are those who mediate transfers of arms by bringing together buyers and sellers or who otherwise facilitate arms transfers.
Arms brokers do not necessarily acquire weapons, nor do weapons transfers they arrange pass through the country from which they operate.
Arms brokers do not necessarily acquire weapons, nor do weapons transfers they arrange pass through the country from which they operate.
The EP demands that EU Member States that do not comply with the Common Position on Arms brokering establish a timetable for achieving compliance and those who have endorsed the Common Position to improve their record of implementation by, for example, establishing national registries of all known arms brokers.
The EP demands that EU Member States that do not comply with the Common Position on Arms brokering establish a timetable for achieving compliance and those who have endorsed the Common Position to improve their record of implementation by, for example, establishing national registries of all known arms brokers.
It urges common minimum practices on extraterritorial controls including the prohibition of brokering activities which violate an arms embargo, whether carried out at home or abroad.
It urges common minimum practices on extraterritorial controls including the prohibition of brokering activities which violate an arms embargo, whether carried out at home or abroad.
ESDP missions and brokering activities
ESDP missions and brokering activities
The EP has been informed that brokers have been involved in obtaining and exporting weapons to third parties that had been collected in the course of ESDP missions - that is EU-led peacekeeping or police missions - and other international disarmament operations, particularly in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
The EP has been informed that brokers have been involved in obtaining and exporting weapons to third parties that had been collected in the course of ESDP missions - that is EU-led peacekeeping or police missions - and other international disarmament operations, particularly in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
For this reason the EP calls for measures to be taken to avoid such brokers' s initiatives.
For this reason the EP calls for measures to be taken to avoid such brokers' s initiatives.
The EP is satisfied that the Council has taken up its recommendations to assist acceding countries and new neighbours in implementing the harmonisation of policies on arms export control and in fulfilling the principles and criteria contained in the Code of Conduct.
The EP is satisfied that the Council has taken up its recommendations to assist acceding countries and new neighbours in implementing the harmonisation of policies on arms export control and in fulfilling the principles and criteria contained in the Code of Conduct.
It proposes that when a country has entered accession negotiations with the EU, the Council publishes a report on the transfer control system and practices of that state.
It proposes that when a country has entered accession negotiations with the EU, the Council publishes a report on the transfer control system and practices of that state.
It recommends that for those acceding countries which do not have adequate arms transfer control standards, their advancement towards accession status is made dependent on improving their standards.
It recommends that for those acceding countries which do not have adequate arms transfer control standards, their advancement towards accession status is made dependent on improving their standards.
International Arms Trade Treaty
International Arms Trade Treaty
On 26 October 2006 the UN General Assembly's First Committee voted in favour of a proposal to develop an Arms Trade Treaty.
On 26 October 2006 the UN General Assembly's First Committee voted in favour of a proposal to develop an Arms Trade Treaty.
The work on the Treaty will begin in early 2007 when the UN Secretary General will seek the views of all UN Member States on the feasibility, scope and draft parameters on a comprehensive legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the export, import and transfer of conventional arms.
The work on the Treaty will begin in early 2007 when the UN Secretary General will seek the views of all UN Member States on the feasibility, scope and draft parameters on a comprehensive legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the export, import and transfer of conventional arms.
The report will then be submitted to the General Assembly in late 2007 for further work.
The report will then be submitted to the General Assembly in late 2007 for further work.
The EP requests that the EU Presidency and Member States actively support the work on a globally binding Arms Trade Treaty.
The EP requests that the EU Presidency and Member States actively support the work on a globally binding Arms Trade Treaty.
Transparency (relations between EP, national parliaments and the EU Council in arms control policy)
Transparency (relations between EP, national parliaments and the EU Council in arms control policy)
The EP welcomes the initiatives taken by the Austrian, Finnish and UK Presidencies to present their work on the development of the Code to the EP's Subcommittee on Security and Defence and the opportunity given to the European Parliament's Rapporteur to engage in discussion and exchange of information at a COARM Working Group meeting on the drawing-up of the European Parliament's Report and the Council's Annual Report.
The EP welcomes the initiatives taken by the Austrian, Finnish and UK Presidencies to present their work on the development of the Code to the EP's Subcommittee on Security and Defence and the opportunity given to the European Parliament's Rapporteur to engage in discussion and exchange of information at a COARM Working Group meeting on the drawing-up of the European Parliament's Report and the Council's Annual Report.
The EP fully supports the decision referred to in the EU Council's Eighth Report that each Presidency should endeavour to meet the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and Defence as well as the practice of inviting the Parliament's Rapporteur to a COARM meeting once per Presidency.
The EP fully supports the decision referred to in the EU Council's Eighth Report that each Presidency should endeavour to meet the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Security and Defence as well as the practice of inviting the Parliament's Rapporteur to a COARM meeting once per Presidency.
To enhance transparency measures, the EP urges the Council to require every Member State to publish national reports, meeting agreed minimum standards, and to require that such reports be sent to the European Parliament and to national parliaments;
To enhance transparency measures, the EP urges the Council to require every Member State to publish national reports, meeting agreed minimum standards, and to require that such reports be sent to the European Parliament and to national parliaments;
Council's Seventh and Eighth Annual Reports according to Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Export
Council's Seventh and Eighth Annual Reports according to Operative Provision 8 of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Export
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in report
Motion(s) for resolution(s) included in report
Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Georgios Karatzaferis, Helmut Kuhne, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Bernd Posselt, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Marek Siwiec, István Szent-Iványi, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Panagiotis Beglitis, Bastiaan Belder, André Brie, Elmar Brok, Philip Claeys, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Anna Ibrisagic, Georgios Karatzaferis, Helmut Kuhne, Francisco José Millán Mon, Pierre Moscovici, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, Tobias Pflüger, Mirosław Mariusz Piotrowski, Paweł Bartłomiej Piskorski, Bernd Posselt, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Gitte Seeberg, Marek Siwiec, István Szent-Iványi, Antonio Tajani, Charles Tannock, Paavo Väyrynen, Luis Yañez-Barnuevo García, Josef Zieleniec
Substitutes present for the final vote
Substitutes present for the final vote
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Francisco Assis, Alexandra Dobolyi, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Carlo Fatuzzo, Kinga Gál, Milan Horáček, Tunne Kelam, Jaromír Kohlíček, Alexander Lambsdorff, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Doris Pack
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Francisco Assis, Alexandra Dobolyi, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Carlo Fatuzzo, Kinga Gál, Milan Horáček, Tunne Kelam, Jaromír Kohlíček, Alexander Lambsdorff, Jaime Mayor Oreja, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Doris Pack
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Substitutes under Rule 178(2) present for the final vote
Pilar Ayuso, Esther Herranz García, Ewa Klamt, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Marios Matsakis
Pilar Ayuso, Esther Herranz García, Ewa Klamt, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Marios Matsakis
за външното измерение на борбата срещу международния тероризъм
on the external dimension of the fight against international terrorism
PE 376.543v02-00
PE 376.543v02-00
EXPOSICIÓN DE MOTIVOS.................................................................................................19
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT..............................................................................................17
OPINIÓN MINORITARIA......................................................................................................23
MINORITY OPINION.............................................................................................................21
AVIS DE LA COMMISSION DU DEVELOPPEMENT..........................................................24
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT......................................................22
OPINIÓN de la commission des libertés civiles, de la justice et des affaires intérieures 29
OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS 27
– като взе предвид Договора за създаване на конституция за Европа,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing a European Constitution,
– като взе предвид членове 6 и 7 и Дял V от Договора за ЕС,
– having regard to Article 6 and 7 and Triple V of the EU Treaty,
– като взе предвид Всеобщата декларация за правата на човека от 10 декември 1948 г.,
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948,
– като взе предвид Европейската конвенция за защита правата на човека и основните свободи, подписана в Рим на 4 ноември 1950 г.,
– having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed in Rome on 4 November 1950,
– като взе предвид Европейската конвенция на Съвета на Европа за борба с международния тероризъм, подписана в Страсбург на 27 февруари 1977 г.,
– having regard to the European Convention on the Suppression of International Terrorism of the Council of Europe signed in Strasbourg on 27 January 1977,
– като взе предвид действащите тринадесет инструмента на ООН и приетите през 2005 г четири инструмента, които все още не са в сила, относно предотвратяването и изкореняването на международния тероризъм, Резолюции 1368, 1373 (от 2001 г.) и 1267 (от 1999 г.) на Съвета за сигурност, както и Резолюцията на Генералната асамблея за Всеобхватната антитерористична стратегия на ООН и приложения План за действие от 8 септември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the thirteen United Nations instruments currently in force and to the four instruments adopted in 2005 but not yet in force relating to the prevention and eradication of international terrorism, Security Council Resolutions 1368 and 1373 (2001) and 1267 (1999) as well as the General Assembly Resolution on the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and the annexed Plan of Action of 8 September 2006,
– като взе предвид заключенията относно тероризма на Световната среща на високо равнище на ООН през 2005 г.,
– having regard to the 2005 UN World Summit Outcome conclusions on terrorism,
– като взе предвид доклада по инициативата „Алианс на цивилизациите”, представен на генералния секретар на ООН на 13 ноември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the Report 'Alliance of Civilisations' presented to the UN Secretary General on 13 November 2006,
– като взе предвид Европейската стратегия за сигурност, под надслов „Сигурна Европа в един по-добър свят”, приета от Европейския съвет на 12 декември 2003 г., и Стратегията на ЕС против разпространението на оръжия за масово унищожение от същата дата,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy - a secure Europe in a better world - adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, and the EU Strategy Against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction of the same date,
– като взе предвид доклада „Доктрина за човешка сигурност – Доклад от Барселона на групата за проучвания относно европейските възможности в областта на сигурността“, представен на Върховния представител на ЕС за общата външна политика и политика на сигурност на 15 септември 2004 г.,
– having regard to the report 'A Human Security Doctrine - The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe's Security Capabilities' as presented to the EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy on 15 September 2004,
– като взе предвид заключенията на Европейския съвет в Брюксел от 25 и 26 март 2004 г. и по-специално декларацията на Европейския съвет от 25 март 2004 г. относно борбата срещу тероризма, която съдържа клауза за солидарност,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 25 and 26 March 2004, in particular the European Council Declaration of 25 March 2004 on combating terrorism, which included a solidarity clause,
– като взе предвид преразгледания План за действие/План за работа, приет от Европейския съвет на неговото заседание от 17 и 18 юни 2004 г.,
– having regard to the revised Action Plan/Roadmap adopted by the European Council at its meeting on 17 and 18 June 2004,
– като взе предвид Стратегията на Европейския съюз за борба срещу тероризма, приета от Европейския съвет на неговата среща на 14 и 15 декември 2005 г., както и Стратегията на Европейския съюз за борба срещу радикализирането и вербуването за терористични цели, приета от Европейския съвет на същата дата,
– having regard to the European Union Counter-Terrorism Strategy adopted by the European Council at its meeting of 14 and 15 December 2005 and the European Union Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism adopted by the European Council on the same date,
– като взе предвид заключенията от Международната среща на върха по въпросите на демокрацията, тероризма и сигурността, състояла се в Мадрид от 8 до 11 март 2005 г.,
– having regard to the conclusions of the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security held in Madrid from 8 to 11 March 2005,
– като взе предвид доклада на Генералния секретар на ООН от 27 април 2006 г., озаглавен „Обединени срещу тероризма: препоръки за всеобхватна антитерористична стратегия” (A/60/825),
– having regard to the report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations of 27 April 2006 'Uniting Against Terrorism: Recommendations for a global counter-terrorism strategy' (A/60/825),
– като взе предвид доклада на Работната групата на високо равнище на ООН по проблемите на заплахите, предизвикателствата и промяната, както и доклада на Генералния секретар на ООН, предназначен за срещата на високо равнище през 2005 г. и озаглавен „При по-голяма свобода: към развитие, сигурност и човешки права за всички",
– having regard to the 2005 report of the UN High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change and the report of the UN Secretary General for the 2005 reform summit: ‘In larger freedom: towards development; security and human rights for all’,
– като взе предвид Евро-средиземноморския кодекс на поведение за борба срещу тероризма, приет от Евро-средиземноморската среща на високо равнище, състояла се на 27 и 28 ноември в Барселона,
– having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Code of Conduct on Countering Terrorism, adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Summit of 27 and 28 November 2005 in Barcelona,
– като взе предвид декларациите на ЕС и САЩ относно борбата срещу тероризма и засилването на взаимното сътрудничество с оглед неразпространението на оръжия и борбата срещу тероризма от 26 юни 2004 г. и 20 юни 2005 г., и като отбелязва с голямо безпокойство наличието на секретна програма на ЦРУ за задържане на лица, чието съществуване бе потвърдено от президента на САЩ на 6 септември 2006 г.,
– having regard to the EU-USA declarations on the fight against terrorism and the strengthening of mutual cooperation with regard to non-proliferation and combating terrorism of 26 June 2004 and 20 June 2005, and noting with great concern the CIA's secret detention programme that President Bush confirmed on 6 September 2006,
– като взе предвид Пътната карта на Европейския съюз и Русия за Общо пространство на външна сигурност, подписана на 10 май 2005 г. по време на XV-та среща на високо равнище ЕС-Русия,
– having regard to the European Union-Russia Road Map for the Common Space of External Security signed on 10 May 2005 on the occasion of the XVth EU-Russia Summit,
– като взе предвид Общата декларация на Европейския съюз и на Асоциацията на страните от Югоизточна Азия (АСЕАН) относно тероризма, подписана на 27 януари 2003 г. по повод на XIV-та среща ЕС-АСЕАН на ниво министри,
– having regard to the Joint EU-ASEAN Declaration on Terrorism signed on 27 January 2003 on the occasion of the XIVth EU-ASEAN Ministerial Meeting,
– като взе предвид Общата декларация на ЕС и Организацията за африканско единство (ОАЕ) относно тероризма, подписана през 2001 г.,
– having regard to the Joint EU-OUA Declaration on Terrorism signed in 2001,
– като взе предвид Римския статут на Международния наказателен съд, приет на 17 юни 1998 г. от Дипломатическата конференция на пълномощните представители на ООН,
– having regard to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 June 1998 by the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries,
– като взе предвид Съобщението на Комисията, озаглавено „Предотвратяване и борба срещу финансирането на тероризма чрез подобрена координация на национално равнище и по-голяма прозрачност в нестопанския сектор”, както и включената в него Препоръка към държавите-членки (MEMO/05/460 от 1 декември 2005 г.),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication on “The Prevention of and Fight against Terrorist Financing through enhanced national level coordination and greater transparency of the non-profit sector, including a Recommendation to the Member States” (MEMO/05/460, 1 December 2005),
– като взе предвид своята препоръка от 7 юни 2005 г. към Европейския съвет и Съвета на ЕС за антитерористично действие
– having regard to its Recommendation of 7 June 2005 to the European Council and the Council on the EU anti-terrorism Action
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по външни работи и становищата на Комисията по развитие и Комисията по граждански свободи, правосъдие и вътрешни работи ( A6‑0441/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0441/2006 ),
A. като има предвид, че в настоящия момент международният тероризъм (в това число и неговата идеология) се явява една от най-големите заплахи за сигурността, мира, стабилността и демократичните ценности на международната общност и съставлява по-специално пряка заплаха за европейските граждани, държавите-членки на ЕС, демокрацията и правовата държава, които са основополагащи за Европейския съюз ценности,
A. whereas international terrorism (including its ideology) now constitutes one of the greatest threats to security, peace, stability and the democratic values of the international community and in particular a direct threat to European citizens, EU Member States, democracy and the rule of law, values on which the European Union is founded,
Б. като има предвид разнородния характер на тероризма, на организациите, които се занимават с него, както и на държавите и елементите с недържавен характер, които го спонсорират, финансират и използват за свои цели, като има предвид също така оформящия се и непредсказуем характер на едно явление, което предполага очевидно опортюнистични цели (по-специално, при тероризма, извършван от радикални групировки, претендиращи, че защитават исляма), и необходимостта от това Европейският съюз да води изпреварваща, а не само ответна политика по отношение на борбата срещу това явление,
B. having regard to the diverse nature of terrorism, of the organisations which practise it and of the States and non-state agents which sponsor it, finance it and practise it for their own ends; having regard also to the emerging and unpredictable nature of a phenomenon which presupposes an obvious sense of opportunity (particularly in the case of the terrorism practised by radical groups which claim to be defending Islam) and the need for the European Union to pursue a proactive (and not just a reactive) policy in order to combat it,
В. като има предвид, че Европа се превърна от платформа за логистична подкрепа в основен прицел на планираните нападения,
C. whereas Europe, from being mainly a platform for logistical support, has turned into a major object of planned attacks,
Г. като има предвид, че според Европейската стратегия за сигурност, борбата срещу тероризма се явява приоритет за Европейския съюз и ключов елемент в действието извън неговите граници,
D. whereas, pursuant to the European Security Strategy, the fight against terrorism constitutes a priority for the European Union and a key element in its external action,