natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
The most important method of protecting cod stocks is not, therefore, the introduction of new rules for cod fishing but rather guarantees that there is compliance with existing regulations and this area must, therefore, be given priority.
The most important method of protecting cod stocks is not, therefore, the introduction of new rules for cod fishing but rather guarantees that there is compliance with existing regulations and this area must, therefore, be given priority.
It is the responsibility of the Member States to ensure compliance with this regulation.
It is the responsibility of the Member States to ensure compliance with this regulation.
At the present time, there are evidently serious shortcomings in how they bear this responsibility.
At the present time, there are evidently serious shortcomings in how they bear this responsibility.
This situation is detrimental for both cod stocks and the environment of the Baltic Sea.
This situation is detrimental for both cod stocks and the environment of the Baltic Sea.
As the Community is not able itself to control the fishing activities, or to impose penalties for illegal fishing, its efforts must focus on various methods of inducing the Member States to enforce this regulation.
As the Community is not able itself to control the fishing activities, or to impose penalties for illegal fishing, its efforts must focus on various methods of inducing the Member States to enforce this regulation.
Cod stocks are also affected by the fact that far too much cod has been landed while it is still young and has only managed to spawn once, and sometimes not even at all.
Cod stocks are also affected by the fact that far too much cod has been landed while it is still young and has only managed to spawn once, and sometimes not even at all.
A direct consequence of this is that the growth of stocks suffers and the ability of stocks to recover is reduced.
A direct consequence of this is that the growth of stocks suffers and the ability of stocks to recover is reduced.
It is also noteworthy that the market value of the fish finally landed is lower because the cod landed is far too young.
It is also noteworthy that the market value of the fish finally landed is lower because the cod landed is far too young.
In order to prevent a collapse in cod stocks in the Baltic Sea, a strict allocation of quotas must be maintained.
In order to prevent a collapse in cod stocks in the Baltic Sea, a strict allocation of quotas must be maintained.
It must be possible to follow the annual scientific assessments of the cod stock, on which the Council's decisions are made, without restriction.
It must be possible to follow the annual scientific assessments of the cod stock, on which the Council's decisions are made, without restriction.
The environment and the long-term view are the primary concerns, not short-term social and political objectives.
The environment and the long-term view are the primary concerns, not short-term social and political objectives.
All in all, in order to manage the environment and cod fishing in the Baltic Sea, a new fisheries policy is needed, a policy that makes fishermen throughout the Union themselves feel and take responsibility for the survival of the stock.
All in all, in order to manage the environment and cod fishing in the Baltic Sea, a new fisheries policy is needed, a policy that makes fishermen throughout the Union themselves feel and take responsibility for the survival of the stock.
One system which has proved effective in protecting fish stocks and enabling fishermen to continue with their livelihood, is ITQ (individually transferable quotas).
One system which has proved effective in protecting fish stocks and enabling fishermen to continue with their livelihood, is ITQ (individually transferable quotas).
ITQ give individual rights to fish by giving fishermen an individual quota per species, fishing ground and year.
ITQ give individual rights to fish by giving fishermen an individual quota per species, fishing ground and year.
Initially, the total quota is set by an appropriate authority, e.g. the Scientific Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), and is subsequently set in accordance with proposals from fishermen's own organisations.
Initially, the total quota is set by an appropriate authority, e.g. the Scientific Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), and is subsequently set in accordance with proposals from fishermen's own organisations.
ITQ provide fishermen with incentives not to catch too much fish since that has directly detrimental consequences in the long term.
ITQ provide fishermen with incentives not to catch too much fish since that has directly detrimental consequences in the long term.
It is directly in the fishermen's own interests to comply with the rules, monitor and combat illegal fishing and protect spawning grounds.
It is directly in the fishermen's own interests to comply with the rules, monitor and combat illegal fishing and protect spawning grounds.
Since ITQ can be sold, there is also a realistic possibility for any fisherman wishing to abandon the profession to establish a platform to start a new career.
Since ITQ can be sold, there is also a realistic possibility for any fisherman wishing to abandon the profession to establish a platform to start a new career.
ITQ have been used with good results in New Zealand, Alaska and Iceland.
ITQ have been used with good results in New Zealand, Alaska and Iceland.
Cod fishing in the Baltic Sea could be used as a pilot project for ITQ in the EU.
Cod fishing in the Baltic Sea could be used as a pilot project for ITQ in the EU.
It is a limited fishing ground with two cod stocks but with relatively short distances for fishermen to move between the fishing grounds and the stocks.
It is a limited fishing ground with two cod stocks but with relatively short distances for fishermen to move between the fishing grounds and the stocks.
In summary, the proposals for measures are as follows:
In summary, the proposals for measures are as follows:
In Subdivisions 25-32, the fishing mortality rate is set to 0.
In Subdivisions 25-32, the fishing mortality rate is set to 0.
This means that no fishing is permitted at all.
This means that no fishing is permitted at all.
Introduce stricter requirements for Member States' control and penalties for illegal cod fishing, and instruct the Commission to name and publish a list of those States which are found wanting in this respect.
Introduce stricter requirements for Member States' control and penalties for illegal cod fishing, and instruct the Commission to name and publish a list of those States which are found wanting in this respect.
Increase the minimum permissible size for landed cod to 40 cm, thereby giving cod further opportunities to breed and thus to strengthen the stock.
Increase the minimum permissible size for landed cod to 40 cm, thereby giving cod further opportunities to breed and thus to strengthen the stock.
Allow science to determine the size of cod quotas and not allow the Member States to ignore the environmental aspects when setting quotas.
Allow science to determine the size of cod quotas and not allow the Member States to ignore the environmental aspects when setting quotas.
In making its assessment, the Commission should explore the possibilities of introducing ITQ for cod fishing in the Baltic Sea and, thereby, increase the incentives for individual fishermen to conserve stocks.
In making its assessment, the Commission should explore the possibilities of introducing ITQ for cod fishing in the Baltic Sea and, thereby, increase the incentives for individual fishermen to conserve stocks.
Комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните приканва водещата комисия по рибно стопанство да включи в доклада си следните изменения:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Fisheries, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
(3) Многогодишен план за управление на запасите от треска в Балтийско море бе приет под егидата на Международната комисия по риболова при Балтийско море (МКРБМ) през 2003 г.
(3) A multi-annual management plan for the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea was adopted through the auspices of the International Baltic Sea Fishery Commission (IBSFC) in 2003.
(3а) Разделянето на Балтийско море на Западна (подучастъци 22, 23 и 24 по МСИМ) и Източна част (подучастъци 25-32 по МСИМ ) се определя от факта, че те представляват отделни екосистеми с напълно различни характеристики .
(3a) The Baltic Sea 's division into a Western (ICES Subdivisions 22, 23 and 24) and an Eastern part (ICES Subdivisions 25 to 32) is determined by the fact that they are separate ecosystems with totally different properties.
The larger, eastern part, is unique and the cod stocks there are uniquely adapted to the Baltic Sea.
The larger, eastern part, is unique and the cod stocks there are uniquely adapted to the Baltic Sea.
(4а) Разпоредбите на плана на Международната комисия по риболова в Балтийско море (МКРБМ) от 2003 г. относно определянето на допустимите количества улов не са взети предвид в решенията на Съвета .
(4a) The provisions in the 2003 IBSFC plan concerning the setting of TACs have not been followed in the decisions taken by the Council.
Council has consistently adopted TACs that have been too high.
Council has consistently adopted TACs that have been too high.
Съображение 4 б (ново)
Recital 4 b (new)
(4б) Въпреки че промените в климата и замърсяването са причина за значителни изменения в екосистемата на Балтийско море, най-сериозните заплахи за устойчивото управление в Балтийско море са прекомерно високите риболовни квоти, отпускани в миналото, и нелегалният риболов, който от своя страна се дължи на липсата на контрол върху риболовната дейност и нежеланието да се преследват нарушенията на действащите разпоредби.
(4b) Although climate change and pollution have caused significant changes in the Baltic Sea ecosystem, t he most serious threats to sustainable management in the Baltic Sea are the excessively generous fishing quotas allocated in the past and illegal fishing, the latter being due to a lack of control of fishing activities and reluctance to prosecute infringements of current regulations.
Illegal fishing is a serious problem, but generous quotas as well.
Illegal fishing is a serious problem, but generous quotas as well.
For the eastern management area ( in ICES Subdivisions 25 to 32 ) a temporary ban on fishing seems to be the only safe option for stocks to recover.
For the eastern management area ( in ICES Subdivisions 25 to 32 ) a temporary ban on fishing seems to be the only safe option for stocks to recover.
In 2005, the catches in the western part were 25 000 tonnes and in the eastern part 40 000 tonnes.
In 2005, the catches in the western part were 25 000 tonnes and in the eastern part 40 000 tonnes.
The researcher´s opinion is however that it should have been zero in the eastern part.
The researcher´s opinion is however that it should have been zero in the eastern part.
The relation between legal and illegal fishing tells us that the illegal fishing represents around 40% of the total fishing.
The relation between legal and illegal fishing tells us that the illegal fishing represents around 40% of the total fishing.
(- 5) Член 5, параграф 1 от Регламент (ЕО) № 2371/2002 изисква Съвета да приеме с приоритетно значение планове за възстановяване на рибните стопанства, които експлоатират запаси, намиращи се под сигурните биологични граници .
(-5) Article 5(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 requires the Council to adopt, as a priority, recovery plans for fisheries exploiting stocks which are outside safe biological limits.
(5) Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 requires inter alia that , to achieve that objective, the Community is to apply the precautionary approach in taking measures to protect and conserve the stock, to provide for its sustainable exploitation and to reduce to a minimum the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems.
(5) Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 requires inter alia that , to achieve that objective, the Community is to apply the precautionary approach in taking measures to protect and conserve the stock, to provide for its sustainable exploitation and to reduce to a minimum the impact of fishing on marine ecosystems.
It should aim at a progressive implementation of an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, and should contribute to efficient fishing activities within an economically viable and competitive fisheries industry, providing a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing Baltic cod and taking the interests of consumers into account.
It should aim at a progressive implementation of an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, and should contribute to efficient fishing activities within an economically viable and competitive fisheries industry, providing a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing Baltic cod and taking the interests of consumers into account.
(5) Член 5, параграф 3 от Регламент (ЕО) № 2371/2002 изисква плановете за възстановяване (i) да бъдат изработени на основата на подхода на предпазливост, (ii) да осигуряват устойчивата експлоатация на запасите и да гарантират, че въздействието на риболовната дейност върху морските екосистеми се поддържа на устойчиви нива, както и (iii) да бъдат многогодишни и да посочват предвиждания график за постигане на набелязаните цели.
(5) Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 requires inter alia that the recovery plans (i) shall be drawn up on the basis of the precautionary approach, (ii) shall ensure the sustainable exploitation of stocks and that the impact of fishing activities on marine eco-systems is kept at sustainable levels and (iii) shall be multi-annual and indicate the expected time frame for reaching the targets established.
(9) To ensure stability in the fishing possibilities, it is appropriate to limit the variation in the TACs from one year to the next.
(9) To ensure stability in the fishing possibilities, it is appropriate to limit the variation in the TACs from one year to the next.
(9) За да се предотврати рязкото намаляване на риболова и да се улесни бързото възстановяване на запасите до равнища, в състояние да поддържат по-високи допустими количества улов, е важно определянето на допустимите количества улов да става в съгласие с препоръките на МСИМ.
(9) In order to prevent a collapse of the fishery and facilitate a quick recovery to stock levels able to support a larger TAC , it is important that the setting of TACs be consistent with the advice from ICES.
The EU claims to follow scientific advice and the scientific advice from ICES has been consistently exceeded, resulting in today's depleted stock.
The EU claims to follow scientific advice and the scientific advice from ICES has been consistently exceeded, resulting in today's depleted stock.
2) 0.3 on ages 4 to 7 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 25 to 32.
2) 0.3 on ages 4 to 7 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 25 to 32.
2) 0 за риба на възраст от 4 до 7 години, за запасите от треска в подучастъци 25-32.
2) 0 on ages 4 to 7 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 25 to 32.
The scientific expertise has expressed serious concern about the fast depletion of the cod stocks in the eastern management area and proposed a total ban on fishing for the time being to enable the stocks to recover.
The scientific expertise has expressed serious concern about the fast depletion of the cod stocks in the eastern management area and proposed a total ban on fishing for the time being to enable the stocks to recover.
It is better to have a total ban for all countries at the same time, rather than different periods for different countries, to allow the cod to recover.
It is better to have a total ban for all countries at the same time, rather than different periods for different countries, to allow the cod to recover.
During a total ban, the illegal fishing is made impossible in practice.
During a total ban, the illegal fishing is made impossible in practice.
The Council shall adopt the TAC for the cod stocks concerned that, according to a scientific evaluation carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), is the higher of:
The Council shall adopt the TAC for the cod stocks concerned that, according to a scientific evaluation carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), is the higher of:
Съветът приема допустимите количества улов за съответните запаси от треска съобразно с научната оценка, изготвена от Научния, технически и икономически комитет по риболова (НТИКР), така че количествата полово зряла риба в морето да бъде по-голямо от стойностите, определени в член 4, параграф 1 .
The Council shall adopt the TAC for the cod stocks concerned that, according to a scientific evaluation carried out by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), would result in the quantities of mature fish in the sea being greater than the amounts defined in Article 4(1).
Ако научната оценка потвърди наличието на тези количества, Съветът приема допустимо количество улов , което позволява постигането на равнището на процент на риболовна смъртност, определено в член 4, параграф 2 .
If the scientific evaluation shows that this would be the case, the Council shall adopt the TAC that would result in the level of fishing mortality rate defined in Article 4(2).
Ако научната оценка не потвърди наличието на тези количества, Съветът приема възможно най-ниското допустимо количество улов .
If the scientific evaluation shows that this would not be the case, the Council shall adopt the lowest possible TAC.
(a) the TAC that would result in a 10% reduction in the fishing mortality rate in its year of application compared to the fishing mortality rate estimated for the preceding year.
(a) the TAC that would result in a 10% reduction in the fishing mortality rate in its year of application compared to the fishing mortality rate estimated for the preceding year.
(b) the TAC that would result in the level of fishing mortality rate defined in Article 4.
(b) the TAC that would result in the level of fishing mortality rate defined in Article 4.
Where the application of paragraph 1 would result in a TAC that exceeds the TAC for the preceding year by more than 15%, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is 15% greater than the TAC of that year.
Where the application of paragraph 1 would result in a TAC that exceeds the TAC for the preceding year by more than 15%, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is 15% greater than the TAC of that year.
В случаите, в които прилагането на параграф 1 би довело до допустими количества улов, надвишаващи тези за предишната година с повече от 15%, Съветът приема допустими количества улов с 15% по-високи от допустимите количества улов за съответната година.
Where the application of paragraph 1 would result in a TAC that exceeds the TAC for the preceding year by more than 15%, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is 15% greater than the TAC of that year.
Where the application of paragraph 1 would result in a TAC that is more than 15% below the TAC of the preceding year, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is 15% less the TAC of that year.
Where the application of paragraph 1 would result in a TAC that is more than 15% below the TAC of the preceding year, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is 15% less the TAC of that year.
Paragraph 3 shall not apply where a scientific evaluation carried out by the STECF shows that the fishing mortality rate in the year of application of the TAC will exceed a value of 1 per year from the ages 3 to 6 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 22, 23 and 24 or a value of 0.6 per year for the ages 4 to 7 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 25 to 32.
Paragraph 3 shall not apply where a scientific evaluation carried out by the STECF shows that the fishing mortality rate in the year of application of the TAC will exceed a value of 1 per year from the ages 3 to 6 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 22, 23 and 24 or a value of 0.6 per year for the ages 4 to 7 years for the cod stock in Subdivisions 25 to 32.
The Commission proposes that TACs should not decrease by more than 15% in a year, but in cases where stocks are depleted and in need or urgent conservation measures, waiting too long can serve to increase the risk to the stock.
The Commission proposes that TACs should not decrease by more than 15% in a year, but in cases where stocks are depleted and in need or urgent conservation measures, waiting too long can serve to increase the risk to the stock.
(b) from 15 June to 14 September in Subdivisions 25 to 27 .
(b) from 15 June to 14 September in Subdivisions 25 to 27.
б) В подучастъци 25-32 не се разрешава какъвто и да е риболов .
In Subdivisions 25 to 32 no fishing shall be permitted at all.
This amendment is related to the amendment of Ms Brepoels and Mr Wijkman on article 4, point 2.
This amendment is related to the amendment of Ms Brepoels and Mr Wijkman on article 4, point 2.
Member States shall issue the special permit for fishing for cod referred to in paragraph 1 only to Community vessels holding in 2005 a special permit for fishing for cod in the Baltic Sea in accordance with point 6.2.1 of Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 27/2005 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required.
Member States shall issue the special permit for fishing for cod referred to in paragraph 1 only to Community vessels holding in 2005 a special permit for fishing for cod in the Baltic Sea in accordance with point 6.2.1 of Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 27/2005 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required.
However, a Member State may issue a special permit for fishing for cod to a Community vessel, flying the flag of that Member State, not holding a special fishing permit in 2005 if it ensures that at least an equivalent capacity, measured in kilowatts (kW), is prevented from fishing in the Baltic Sea with any gear referred to in paragraph 1.
However, a Member State may issue a special permit for fishing for cod to a Community vessel, flying the flag of that Member State, not holding a special fishing permit in 2005 if it ensures that at least an equivalent capacity, measured in kilowatts (kW), is prevented from fishing in the Baltic Sea with any gear referred to in paragraph 1.
Държавите-членки издават специалното разрешение за риболов на треска, упоменато в параграф 1, единствено на риболовни кораби на Общността, притежаващи през 2005 г. специално разрешение за риболов на треска в Балтийско море в съответствие с приложение III, точка 6.2.1 от Регламент (ЕО) № 27/2005 на Съвета от 22 декември 2004 г., определящ за 2005 г. възможностите за риболов и свързаните с тях условия относно някои рибни запаси и групи от рибни запаси, приложим във водите на Общността и за нейните риболовни кораби, във води, в които са наложени ограничения върху улова.
Member States shall issue the special permit for fishing for cod referred to in paragraph 1 only to Community vessels holding in 2005 a special permit for fishing for cod in the Baltic Sea in accordance with point 6.2.1 of Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 27/2005 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required.