natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
24. със загриженост научи за скорошната критика, отправена от Комисията по отношение на начина, по който органите на Република Хърватия управляват фондовете на ЕС и настоятелно ги призовава, с помощта на Комисията, да вземат неотложни мерки по отношение на установените административни слабости, което да позволи да се преустанови временното спиране на договарянето по програма PHARE 2006 (с общ финансов пакет от 68,5 млн. евро) и възстановяването на първоначалното разпределяне за финансова година 2008 по раздел 1 на ИПП след намаляване в размер на 5 млн. евро;
Has learned with concern about recent criticism voiced by the Commission with regard to the way in which EU funds are being managed by Croatian authorities and urges them, with the assistance of the Commission, to address as a matter of urgency the administrative weaknesses identified so as to allow the lifting of the temporary suspension of contracting under the PHARE 2006 programme (with a total financial envelope of EUR 68.5 million) and the reinstatement of the initial allocation for the financial year 2008 under IPA Component 1, following a reduction of EUR 5 million;
30. призовава Хърватия да запази своето конструктивно отношение и да продължи да играе положителна роля в региона, за да поддържа и укрепва консолидирането на Босна и Херцеговина;
Calls on Croatia to maintain its constructive attitude and continue to play a positive role in the region in order to support and strengthen the consolidation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ;
32. в тази връзка приканва Комисията да увеличи своите усилия и ресурсите, предназначени за изготвянето, обработката и финализирането на договорния материал, така че ЕС да може да реагира бързо и ефикасно на напредъка, постигнат от Хърватия при изпълнението на съответните входни и изходни критерии;
Calls in this context on the Commission to step up its efforts and increase the resources allocated for the preparation, processing and finalisation of negotiating material so that the EU can respond rapidly and efficiently to progress made by Croatia in meeting the relevant opening and closing benchmarks;
Monika Beňová, Elmar Brok, Colm Burke, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michael Gahler, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Jana Hybášková, Anna Ibrisagic, Метин Казак, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Vural Öger, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Béatrice Patrie, Alojz Peterle, Hubert Pirker, Samuli Pohjamo, Bernd Posselt, Libor Rouček, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Кристиан Вигенин, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Monika Beňová, Elmar Brok, Colm Burke, Véronique De Keyser, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michael Gahler, Bronisław Geremek, Maciej Marian Giertych, Alfred Gomolka, Klaus Hänsch, Richard Howitt, Jana Hybášková, Anna Ibrisagic, Metin Kazak, Maria Eleni Koppa, Helmut Kuhne, Joost Lagendijk, Vytautas Landsbergis, Johannes Lebech, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Francisco José Millán Mon, Philippe Morillon, Pasqualina Napoletano, Vural Öger, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Béatrice Patrie, Alojz Peterle, Hubert Pirker, Samuli Pohjamo, Bernd Posselt, Libor Rouček, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Kristian Vigenin, Zbigniew Zaleski, Josef Zieleniec
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Мариела Величкова Баева, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Giulietto Chiesa, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Jaromír Kohlíček, Erik Meijer, Borut Pahor, Józef Pinior, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Inger Segelström, Marcello Vernola
Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Mariela Velichkova Baeva, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Giulietto Chiesa, Andrew Duff, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, David Hammerstein, Jaromír Kohlíček, Erik Meijer, Borut Pahor, Józef Pinior, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Inger Segelström, Marcello Vernola
относно съвместен проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, на регламент на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за общите правила в областта на сигурността на гражданското въздухоплаване и за отмяна на Регламент (ЕО) № 2320/2002
on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation security and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002
(PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD))
(PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD))
PE 400.383v02-00
PE 400.383v02-00
(PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD) )
(PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 – 2005/0191(COD) )
– като взе предвид съвместния проект, одобрен от помирителния комитет, и прилежащите декларации на Комисията (PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 ),
– having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the relevant Commission statements (PE-CONS 3601/2008 – C6‑0029/2008 ),
Приети текстове на 25.4.2007 г., P6_TA(2007)0142 . относно общата позиция на Съвета
Texts adopted, 25.4.2007, P6_TA(2007)0142 . on the Council common position
– като взе предвид становището на Комисията относно измененията в общата позиция, внесени от Парламента ( COM(2007)0475 ),
– having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2007)0475 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на своята делегация в помирителния комитет ( A6‑0049/2008 ),
– having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6‑0049/2008 ),
3. възлага на своя генерален секретар да подпише акта след проверка на надлежното изпълнение на всички процедури и да пристъпи към публикуването му, заедно с генералния секретар на Съвета, в Официален вестник на Европейския съюз;
Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to have it published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
The proposal for a Regulation on common rules in the field of civil aviation security was adopted by the Commission on 22 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0429 ).
The proposal for a Regulation on common rules in the field of civil aviation security was adopted by the Commission on 22 September 2005 ( COM(2005)0429 ).
The fundamental aim of the proposal was to replace Regulation 2320/2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security, which had been adopted very quickly after 11 September 2001.
The fundamental aim of the proposal was to replace Regulation 2320/2002 establishing common rules in the field of civil aviation security, which had been adopted very quickly after 11 September 2001.
After two and a half years of experience with Regulation 2320/2002, it was apparent that a simpler and more flexible legislative framework was needed; one which would leave more decisions to implementing legislation than had the previous, very detailed legislation.
After two and a half years of experience with Regulation 2320/2002, it was apparent that a simpler and more flexible legislative framework was needed; one which would leave more decisions to implementing legislation than had the previous, very detailed legislation.
At the same time, a greater degree of harmonisation was considered necessary to facilitate operations of the industry.
At the same time, a greater degree of harmonisation was considered necessary to facilitate operations of the industry.
Finally, it was hoped that greater clarity would make for more effective implementation of the security standards.
Finally, it was hoped that greater clarity would make for more effective implementation of the security standards.
The legislative procedure before conciliation
The legislative procedure before conciliation
The committee responsible, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, appointed Mr Costa as rapporteur.
The committee responsible, the Committee on Transport and Tourism, appointed Mr Costa as rapporteur.
The Parliament held its first reading on 15 June 2006.
The Parliament held its first reading on 15 June 2006.
Contacts between the Parliament and the Council took place during the Finnish Presidency in an attempt to reach an early second reading agreement.
Contacts between the Parliament and the Council took place during the Finnish Presidency in an attempt to reach an early second reading agreement.
A compromise package (later referred to as the "Finnish compromise"
A compromise package (later referred to as the "Finnish compromise"
See Council documents 14498/06, 14145/06, 12455/07 and DS 653/07. ) was, however, rejected by the Parliament.
See Council documents 14498/06, 14145/06, 12455/07 and DS 653/07. ) was, however, rejected by the Parliament.
Thereafter, the Council adopted its common position, on 11 December 2006: the Parliament's second reading took place on 25 April 2007.
Thereafter, the Council adopted its common position, on 11 December 2006: the Parliament's second reading took place on 25 April 2007.
At second reading, the Parliament adopted 97 amendments.
At second reading, the Parliament adopted 97 amendments.
In Parliament's view, the Council's common position had failed to address the question of cost sharing for aviation security measures.
In Parliament's view, the Council's common position had failed to address the question of cost sharing for aviation security measures.
The Parliament restored its first reading position on the issue of financing.
The Parliament restored its first reading position on the issue of financing.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 10 July 2007.
The constituent meeting of Parliament's delegation to the Conciliation Committee was held on 10 July 2007.
Its members mandated the chair, Mrs Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, the chair of the TRAN committee and rapporteur, Mr Costa, and the other members of the negotiation team, Mr Jarzembowski and Mr El Khadraoui, to begin informal negotiations with the Council.
Its members mandated the chair, Mrs Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, the chair of the TRAN committee and rapporteur, Mr Costa, and the other members of the negotiation team, Mr Jarzembowski and Mr El Khadraoui, to begin informal negotiations with the Council.
Before the formal opening of the conciliation procedure on 20 November, four trialogues were held (on 4 September, 25 September, 10 October and 13 November) and the EP delegation met three times (on 5 September, 26 September and 23 October).
Before the formal opening of the conciliation procedure on 20 November, four trialogues were held (on 4 September, 25 September, 10 October and 13 November) and the EP delegation met three times (on 5 September, 26 September and 23 October).
When the conciliation procedure was formally opened, the two most controversial issues were still the financing of aviation security measures and, as had emerged during the procedure, the comitology provisions.
When the conciliation procedure was formally opened, the two most controversial issues were still the financing of aviation security measures and, as had emerged during the procedure, the comitology provisions.
At the conciliation meeting of 20 November, the Council was represented by Mr Lino, Portuguese Minister of Transport, and the Commission by Vice-President Barrot.
At the conciliation meeting of 20 November, the Council was represented by Mr Lino, Portuguese Minister of Transport, and the Commission by Vice-President Barrot.
Even after two trialogues and delegation meetings, no agreement could be reached and the Conciliation Committee was adjourned.
Even after two trialogues and delegation meetings, no agreement could be reached and the Conciliation Committee was adjourned.
A further trialogue at political level, with Mr Lino and Mr Barrot, took place on 10 December.
A further trialogue at political level, with Mr Lino and Mr Barrot, took place on 10 December.
All main outstanding issues (financing, comitology, the transition from the old to the new legal regime) were discussed, but no overall agreement could be reached.
All main outstanding issues (financing, comitology, the transition from the old to the new legal regime) were discussed, but no overall agreement could be reached.
The Parliament delegation meeting on the following day therefore proposed to the Council a package comprising proposals on the three issues mentioned above.
The Parliament delegation meeting on the following day therefore proposed to the Council a package comprising proposals on the three issues mentioned above.
Since the Council could not accept all of these proposals a final agreement could be found only after a further EP delegation meeting on 18 December and an exchange of letters between the Presidency-in-Office of the Council and the chair of the EP delegation.
Since the Council could not accept all of these proposals a final agreement could be found only after a further EP delegation meeting on 18 December and an exchange of letters between the Presidency-in-Office of the Council and the chair of the EP delegation.
Key points of the agreement reached
Key points of the agreement reached
IV.1 Arrangements for financing security measures: Two Articles (Security Costs (Article 5) and Commission Report on Financing (Article 22)) were added to the text.
IV.1 Arrangements for financing security measures: Two Articles (Security Costs (Article 5) and Commission Report on Financing (Article 22)) were added to the text.
The Article on Security Costs sets out, as a first step, certain provisions in this matter.
The Article on Security Costs sets out, as a first step, certain provisions in this matter.
While non-binding language is used for the sharing of costs, the provisions on security charges (that they are directly related to the costs of providing security measures and designed to recover no more than the relevant costs involved) are of a binding nature, using the word "shall".
While non-binding language is used for the sharing of costs, the provisions on security charges (that they are directly related to the costs of providing security measures and designed to recover no more than the relevant costs involved) are of a binding nature, using the word "shall".
The report of the Commission, due no later than 31 December 2008, will deal with the principles of financing civil aviation security measures, the steps necessary to ensure that security charges are used exclusively to meet security costs, and ways to improve the transparency of such charges.
The report of the Commission, due no later than 31 December 2008, will deal with the principles of financing civil aviation security measures, the steps necessary to ensure that security charges are used exclusively to meet security costs, and ways to improve the transparency of such charges.
It will also set out the principles necessary to safeguard undistorted competition between airports and between air carriers and the different methods to ensure consumers' protection as regards the distribution of the costs of security measures between taxpayers and users.
It will also set out the principles necessary to safeguard undistorted competition between airports and between air carriers and the different methods to ensure consumers' protection as regards the distribution of the costs of security measures between taxpayers and users.
This report "will be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal".
This report "will be accompanied, if appropriate, by a legislative proposal".
The Parliament accepted this standard wording together with a statement of Vice-President Barrot.
The Parliament accepted this standard wording together with a statement of Vice-President Barrot.
Vice-President Barrot states that he intends to present to the College of Commissioners a legislative proposal "on the distribution of the costs, between taxpayers and users, of the more stringent aviation security measures that Member States may adopt, further to the common basic standards provided in this new Regulation".
Vice-President Barrot states that he intends to present to the College of Commissioners a legislative proposal "on the distribution of the costs, between taxpayers and users, of the more stringent aviation security measures that Member States may adopt, further to the common basic standards provided in this new Regulation".
IV.2 Comitology: The Parliament succeeded in convincing the Council and the Commission to use the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for a whole series of measures when defining the common basic standards for aviation security (Article 4).
IV.2 Comitology: The Parliament succeeded in convincing the Council and the Commission to use the regulatory procedure with scrutiny for a whole series of measures when defining the common basic standards for aviation security (Article 4).
The new comitology rules will apply, inter alia, to methods for screening of passengers (which will be relevant should the Commission wish to introduce, for example, body scanners as a new method of screening) and to the categories of articles that may be prohibited (such as, for example, liquids).
The new comitology rules will apply, inter alia, to methods for screening of passengers (which will be relevant should the Commission wish to introduce, for example, body scanners as a new method of screening) and to the categories of articles that may be prohibited (such as, for example, liquids).
IV.3 Other issues:
IV.3 Other issues:
· As regards the publication of implementing measures, a general rule was added that measures which have a direct impact on passengers shall be published (recital 16 and Article 16).
· As regards the publication of implementing measures, a general rule was added that measures which have a direct impact on passengers shall be published (recital 16 and Article 16).
· An Article on the cooperation with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) concerning audits was added (Article 8).
· An Article on the cooperation with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) concerning audits was added (Article 8).
· The concept of "one-stop security" was strengthened (recital 20 and Article 20).
· The concept of "one-stop security" was strengthened (recital 20 and Article 20).
· The provisions on the use of sky-marshals were improved with a reference to training (recital 8) and the required security conditions (chapter 10.3 of the Annex).
· The provisions on the use of sky-marshals were improved with a reference to training (recital 8) and the required security conditions (chapter 10.3 of the Annex).
· A provision was added to recital 3 that consideration should be given to the most effective means of offering assistance following terrorist acts that have a major impact in the transport field.
· A provision was added to recital 3 that consideration should be given to the most effective means of offering assistance following terrorist acts that have a major impact in the transport field.
· The date of application of the new Regulation can be less than two years from the entry into force.
· The date of application of the new Regulation can be less than two years from the entry into force.
The Parliament will be involved in the decision on the date of application via the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (Article 24).
The Parliament will be involved in the decision on the date of application via the regulatory procedure with scrutiny (Article 24).
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure on the civil aviation dossier represents a positive outcome for the Parliament.
The agreement reached in the course of the conciliation procedure on the civil aviation dossier represents a positive outcome for the Parliament.
This can clearly be demonstrated by comparing the final outcome with the Finnish compromise on the table during the first reading.
This can clearly be demonstrated by comparing the final outcome with the Finnish compromise on the table during the first reading.
Before the adoption of the common position by the Council, during the second reading and at the beginning of the conciliation procedure, the Council representatives underlined repeatedly that the Finnish compromise was as far as the Council would be able to go.
Before the adoption of the common position by the Council, during the second reading and at the beginning of the conciliation procedure, the Council representatives underlined repeatedly that the Finnish compromise was as far as the Council would be able to go.
Letter from Mr BÁRTOLO (Chairman of Coreper I) to Mrs KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU of 25 July 2007: '... that the Council, for its part, is prepared to show some flexibility on its common position, but that it will not be able to go beyond the principles established in its compromise proposal submitted to Parliament in November 2006.'
Letter from Mr BÁRTOLO (Chairman of Coreper I) to Mrs KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU of 25 July 2007: '... that the Council, for its part, is prepared to show some flexibility on its common position, but that it will not be able to go beyond the principles established in its compromise proposal submitted to Parliament in November 2006.'
The final agreement reached clearly goes much further than the Finnish compromise:
The final agreement reached clearly goes much further than the Finnish compromise:
V.1 Finance
V.1 Finance
Concerning finance , the positions of the Commission
Concerning finance , the positions of the Commission
The initial Commission proposal did not contain any provisions as to the question of who would pay for the security measures.
The initial Commission proposal did not contain any provisions as to the question of who would pay for the security measures.
Parliament had been very disappointed by this omission of the Commission since the Parliament, the Council and the Commission in an Interinstitutional Declaration added to Regulation 2320/2002 had recognised that the funding question had to be analysed urgently. and the Council
Parliament had been very disappointed by this omission of the Commission since the Parliament, the Council and the Commission in an Interinstitutional Declaration added to Regulation 2320/2002 had recognised that the funding question had to be analysed urgently. and the Council
The common position does not contain any provisions on financing.
The common position does not contain any provisions on financing.
In its statement Council outlined that it would be inappropriate in such a technical regulation to include requirements or obligations on financing and that "the principle of subsidiarity dictates that such questions be addressed at national level."
In its statement Council outlined that it would be inappropriate in such a technical regulation to include requirements or obligations on financing and that "the principle of subsidiarity dictates that such questions be addressed at national level."
(OJ C 70 E of 27.3.2007, p.
(OJ C 70 E of 27.3.2007, p.
32) (which did not want to include any provisions on financing in the text) and the Parliament (with several quite far-reaching amendments on this issue
32) (which did not want to include any provisions on financing in the text) and the Parliament (with several quite far-reaching amendments on this issue
Identical amendments in first (AMs 3, 35, 44 and 43) and second reading (AMs 3, 31, 38, 39 and 44). ) were poles apart.
Identical amendments in first (AMs 3, 35, 44 and 43) and second reading (AMs 3, 31, 38, 39 and 44). ) were poles apart.
The final compromise is clearly closer to the Parliaments amendments than the Finnish compromise:
The final compromise is clearly closer to the Parliaments amendments than the Finnish compromise:
As regards the sharing of costs, both texts use non-binding language.
As regards the sharing of costs, both texts use non-binding language.
In the final text, however, the provisions are included in Article 5 while in the Finnish compromise they were only in recital 18a.
In the final text, however, the provisions are included in Article 5 while in the Finnish compromise they were only in recital 18a.