natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
They are also an area in which citizens have pinned great hopes on the EU’s ability to avert future disasters and end such impunity as the culprits might enjoy.
They are also an area in which citizens have pinned great hopes on the EU’s ability to avert future disasters and end such impunity as the culprits might enjoy.
It is therefore vital for the EU institutions to adopt stringent, effective legal rules based on the two core principles of environmental protection and legal protection of victims .
It is therefore vital for the EU institutions to adopt stringent, effective legal rules based on the two core principles of environmental protection and legal protection of victims .
From the legal point of view, the Commission proposal should be welcomed , since it introduces novel legal arrangements likely to make coasts much safer and enable the victims of maritime casualties to obtain compensation more easily.
From the legal point of view, the Commission proposal should be welcomed , since it introduces novel legal arrangements likely to make coasts much safer and enable the victims of maritime casualties to obtain compensation more easily.
At the same time, the proposal is moderate and realistic without, moreover, breaking radically with the status quo .
At the same time, the proposal is moderate and realistic without, moreover, breaking radically with the status quo .
On the contrary, it is consistent with international law and especially the conventions signed in the International Maritime Organisation.
On the contrary, it is consistent with international law and especially the conventions signed in the International Maritime Organisation.
The following points should be mentioned in particular:
The following points should be mentioned in particular:
· ‘Communitarisation’ of the 1996 LLMC , which most Member States are presently not enforcing;
· ‘Communitarisation’ of the 1996 LLMC , which most Member States are presently not enforcing;
· the obligation for ships flying the flag of a Member State or a non-member country to have substantial financial guarantees , to be called upon in the event of abandonment of seafarers or when an accident has occurred; and
· the obligation for ships flying the flag of a Member State or a non-member country to have substantial financial guarantees , to be called upon in the event of abandonment of seafarers or when an accident has occurred; and
· the introduction of direct action whereby victims may apply directly to guarantors with a view to obtaining compensation, a system which will greatly facilitate and speed up the existing legal procedures.
· the introduction of direct action whereby victims may apply directly to guarantors with a view to obtaining compensation, a system which will greatly facilitate and speed up the existing legal procedures.
The obligation to take out guarantees not falling below the limits laid down in the LLMC is fundamentally desirable, although the criterion of doubling the ceilings appears to be somewhat arbitrary.
The obligation to take out guarantees not falling below the limits laid down in the LLMC is fundamentally desirable, although the criterion of doubling the ceilings appears to be somewhat arbitrary.
Nevertheless, the provision should be supported.
Nevertheless, the provision should be supported.
On the other hand, caution would be the most advisable response to the use of serious misconduct as the criterion whereby a shipowner’s liability could not be limited if his ship were flying the flag of a state that was not a contracting party to the 1996 Convention and he were to be guilty of serious misconduct .
On the other hand, caution would be the most advisable response to the use of serious misconduct as the criterion whereby a shipowner’s liability could not be limited if his ship were flying the flag of a state that was not a contracting party to the 1996 Convention and he were to be guilty of serious misconduct .
The Commission is seeking to challenge the right of shipowners to limit their liability: that is a laudable intention, but it does not seem very realistic and, above all, might prove rather counterproductive; the change would probably do more harm than good and should consequently not be supported .
The Commission is seeking to challenge the right of shipowners to limit their liability: that is a laudable intention, but it does not seem very realistic and, above all, might prove rather counterproductive; the change would probably do more harm than good and should consequently not be supported .
Finally, to enable direct action to be exercised to the best possible effect, it is suggested that, when granting guarantee certificates, the authorities concerned should also take into account the business presence which guarantors might have established in the EU .
Finally, to enable direct action to be exercised to the best possible effect, it is suggested that, when granting guarantee certificates, the authorities concerned should also take into account the business presence which guarantors might have established in the EU .
For all the reasons set out above, the Commission proposal should be endorsed, since it marks a further step forward enabling Europe ’s coasts and islands to be made safe.
For all the reasons set out above, the Commission proposal should be endorsed, since it marks a further step forward enabling Europe ’s coasts and islands to be made safe.
This proposal for a directive is, however, a subsidiary measure: the real priority from the point of view of protecting the environment and citizens is for the CLC and HNS conventions to enter into force in all the Member States.
This proposal for a directive is, however, a subsidiary measure: the real priority from the point of view of protecting the environment and citizens is for the CLC and HNS conventions to enter into force in all the Member States.
Комисията по правни въпроси приканва водещата комисия по транспорт и туризъм да включи в доклада си следните изменения:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Transport and Tourism, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its report:
Съображение 1a (ново)
Recital 1 a (new)
Член 2, точка 4 a (нова)
Article 2, point 4 a (new)
4а) "гарант" означава която и да е институция, с която корабособственик сключва финансова гаранция;
(4a) “guarantor” means any institution with which a shipowner takes out a financial guarantee;
Член 4, параграф 3
Article 4, paragraph 3
The use of serious misconduct as the criterion determining a shipowner’s unlimited liability might give rise to legal confusion because this concept is not defined and is in danger of being interpreted in judicial practice in conflicting terms that could overlap with the concept of ‘inexcusable conduct’.
The use of serious misconduct as the criterion determining a shipowner’s unlimited liability might give rise to legal confusion because this concept is not defined and is in danger of being interpreted in judicial practice in conflicting terms that could overlap with the concept of ‘inexcusable conduct’.
On the other hand, applying the civil liability regime to shipowners whose countries have not signed the 1996 Convention, in addition to providing an incentive to sign and ratify the Convention, does not entail any legal uncertainty.
On the other hand, applying the civil liability regime to shipowners whose countries have not signed the 1996 Convention, in addition to providing an incentive to sign and ratify the Convention, does not entail any legal uncertainty.
Удостоверенията се издават от компетентните органи на държавите-членки, след като те се уверят, че корабособственикът отговаря на изискванията, определени в настоящата директива.
Certificates shall be issued by the competent authorities of the Member States once they are sure that the shipowner complies with the requirements laid down in this Directive.
При издаване на удостоверения компетентните органи вземат предвид също така дали гарантът е с място на търговско установяване в ЕС.
When issuing certificates, competent authorities shall also consider the question whether a guarantor has business establishments in the EU.
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners
Antonio López-Istúriz White 23.2.2006
Antonio López-Istúriz White 23.2.2006
Maria Berger, Rosa Díez González, Giuseppe Gargani, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Maria Berger, Rosa Díez González, Giuseppe Gargani, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Aloyzas Sakalas, Gabriele Stauner, Rainer Wieland, Jaroslav Zvěřina
Резултат от окончателното гласуване
Result of final vote
Депутати, присъстващи на окончателното гласуване
Members present for the final vote
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Gabriele Albertini, Inés Ayala Sender, Etelka Barsi-Pataky, Paolo Costa, Michael Cramer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Arūnas Degutis, Christine De Veyrac, Petr Duchoň, Saïd El Khadraoui, Robert Evans, Mathieu Grosch, Georg Jarzembowski, Stanisław Jałowiecki, Timothy Kirkhope, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Sepp Kusstatscher, Jörg Leichtfried, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Erik Meijer, Seán Ó Neachtain, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Willi Piecyk, Luís Queiró, Luca Romagnoli, Gilles Savary, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Georgios Toussas, Yannick Vaugrenard, Marta Vincenzi, Lars Wohlin, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Roberts Zīle
Заместник(ци), присъстващ(и) на окончателното гласуване
Substitute(s) present for the final vote
по предложението за Регламент на Съвета за отмяна на Регламент (EО) № 2040/2000 на Съвета относно бюджетната дисциплина
on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline
PE 384.303v02-00
PE 384.303v02-00
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................5
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT................................................................................................6
за предложението за Регламент на Съвета за отмяна на Регламент (EО) № 2040/2000 на Съвета относно бюджетната дисциплина
on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 on budgetary discipline
– като взе предвид предложението на Комисията до Съвета ( COM(2006)0448 )
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0448 )
– като взе предвид членове 37, 279 и 308 от Договора за ЕО, съгласно които Съветът се е допитал до него ( C6‑0277/2006 ),
– having regard to Articles 37, 279 and 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6‑0277/2006 ),
– като взе предвид доклада на комисия по бюджети ( A6‑0056/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6‑0056/2007 ),
The Commission is proposing that Council Regulation No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000
The Commission is proposing that Council Regulation No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000
OJ L 244, 29.9.2000. , for which Mr Ioannis Averoff was rapporteur on the Committee on Budgets at the time
OJ L 244, 29.9.2000. , for which Mr Ioannis Averoff was rapporteur on the Committee on Budgets at the time
European Parliament resolution of 21 September 2000, OJ C
European Parliament resolution of 21 September 2000, OJ C
75. , be repealed.
75. , be repealed.
It contends that, for the following reasons, the regulation is no longer relevant:
It contends that, for the following reasons, the regulation is no longer relevant:
· in agriculture because budget discipline provisions have been incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
· in agriculture because budget discipline provisions have been incorporated into Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy
Schierhuber report, OJ L 248, 11.8.2005. , and
Schierhuber report, OJ L 248, 11.8.2005. , and
· in the foreign policy domain because a new mechanism has been established for the loan guarantee reserve for 2007-2013.
· in the foreign policy domain because a new mechanism has been established for the loan guarantee reserve for 2007-2013.
Your rapporteur agrees that, since Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 was adopted, budgetary discipline has been enhanced by a new regulation, 1290/2005, as an annual ceiling has been set for EAGGF-finance spending, the maximum financial perspective amounts for the fund having been entered.
Your rapporteur agrees that, since Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 was adopted, budgetary discipline has been enhanced by a new regulation, 1290/2005, as an annual ceiling has been set for EAGGF-finance spending, the maximum financial perspective amounts for the fund having been entered.
That regulation has also ensured that the annual ceiling for EAGGF-financed spending is observed in all circumstances and at all stages in the budget procedure and during budget implementation.
That regulation has also ensured that the annual ceiling for EAGGF-financed spending is observed in all circumstances and at all stages in the budget procedure and during budget implementation.
Provisions relating to reserves in connection with external actions
Provisions relating to reserves in connection with external actions
It is equally true that, in the meantime, a legal basis has been established for the proposed mechanism for endowing the Guarantee Fund for external actions; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 89/2007 of 30 January 2007
It is equally true that, in the meantime, a legal basis has been established for the proposed mechanism for endowing the Guarantee Fund for external actions; Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 89/2007 of 30 January 2007
OJ L 22, 31.1.2007. amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
OJ L 22, 31.1.2007. amending Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2728/94 establishing a Guarantee Fund for external actions
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2006, Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0072 . .
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 14 March 2006, Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0072 . .
The political mandate for the European Investment Bank to award the corresponding loans was issued by the Council on 19 December 2006
The political mandate for the European Investment Bank to award the corresponding loans was issued by the Council on 19 December 2006
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 30 November 2006. .
Seppänen report, European Parliament resolution of 30 November 2006. .
Furthermore, the reserve for emergency aid to third states was incorporated into Article 45(1) of the Financial Regulation as long ago as 2002
Furthermore, the reserve for emergency aid to third states was incorporated into Article 45(1) of the Financial Regulation as long ago as 2002
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1995/2006, OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1995/2006, OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p.
In the meantime, the amount of the emergency aid reserve is now determined in the IIA of 17 May 2006 (paragraph 25).
In the meantime, the amount of the emergency aid reserve is now determined in the IIA of 17 May 2006 (paragraph 25).
Moreover, for the first time, a line 01 04 01 13 was created in the 2007 budget (heading 4: ‘The EU as a Global Player’), with an allocation of EUR 200 m for the reserve for loans and loan guarantees to and in non-member countries.
Moreover, for the first time, a line 01 04 01 13 was created in the 2007 budget (heading 4: ‘The EU as a Global Player’), with an allocation of EUR 200 m for the reserve for loans and loan guarantees to and in non-member countries.
That establishes the necessary legal basis (within the meaning of Article 49(1) of the Financial Regulation and the IIA), and there is no risk of a regulatory gap as a result of the planned repeal of Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000.
That establishes the necessary legal basis (within the meaning of Article 49(1) of the Financial Regulation and the IIA), and there is no risk of a regulatory gap as a result of the planned repeal of Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000.
Consequently, the main components of Council Regulation No 2040/2000 have become obsolete.
Consequently, the main components of Council Regulation No 2040/2000 have become obsolete.
Outdated legislation should be repealed from a ‘better lawmaking’ perspective, too, so as to minimise the number of provisions in force
Outdated legislation should be repealed from a ‘better lawmaking’ perspective, too, so as to minimise the number of provisions in force
Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making of 31 December 2003 (point 35) or, most recently, the working document of 14 November 2006 on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment ( COM(2006)0690 ). .
Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making of 31 December 2003 (point 35) or, most recently, the working document of 14 November 2006 on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment ( COM(2006)0690 ). .
The European Court of Auditors reaches the same conclusion in its Opinion No 8/2006 of 6 December 2006
The European Court of Auditors reaches the same conclusion in its Opinion No 8/2006 of 6 December 2006
OJ C 8, 2.1.2007, p.
OJ C 8, 2.1.2007, p.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the Commission proposal be approved unamended.
Your rapporteur therefore proposes that the Commission proposal be approved unamended.
Repeal of Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000 on budgetary discipline
Repeal of Council Regulation (EC) No 2040/2000 of 26 September 2000 on budgetary discipline
за социалните услуги от общ интерес в Европейския съюз
on social services of general interest in the European Union
PE 378.584v04-00
PE 378.584v04-00
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............12
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............11
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 15
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 14
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 18
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 17
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................21
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...25
OPINION of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ...24
относно оциалните услуги, представляващи обществен интерес в Европейския съюз
on social services of general interest in the European Union
– като взе предвид съобщението на Комисията относно прилагането на общностната лисабонска програма: Социални услуги от общ интерес в Европейския съюз ( COM(2006)0177 ) и придружаващия работен документ на Комисията ( SEC(2006)0516 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: Social services of general interest in the European Union ( COM(2006)0177 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ( SEC(2006)0516 ),
– като взе предвид Договора за създаване на Европейската общност, и по-специално членове 2, 5, 16, 86, 136, 137, параграф 1, букви й) и к), 143, 144 и 145 от него,
– having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 2, 5, 16, 86, 136, 137(1)(j) and (k), 143, 144 and 145 thereof,
– като взе предвид Хартата за основните права на Европейския съюз, и по-специално член 36 от нея,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 36 thereof,
– като взе предвид проектодоговора за създаване на конституция на Европа, и по-специално членове ІІ-94 и ІІІ-122 от него,
– having regard to the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, and in particular Articles II-94 and III-122 thereof,
– като взе предвид своята позиция от 15 ноември 2006 г. относно общата позиция на Съвета за приемане на директива на Европейския парламент и на Съвета относно услугите на вътрешния пазар
– having regard to its position of 15 November 2006 on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market
Приети текстове , Р6_ТА (2006)0490. ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0490 . ,
– като взе предвид заключенията на Европейския съвет в Брюксел на 23 и 24 март 2006 г.,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 23 and 24 March 2006,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 14 януари 2004 г. относно Зелената книга относно услугите от общ интерес
– having regard to its resolution of 14 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 15 март 2006 г. относно социалната защита и социалната интеграция
– having regard to its resolution of 15 March 2006 on social protection and social inclusion
Приети текстове , Р6_ТА (2006)0089. ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0089 . ,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 6 септември 2006 г. относно Европейския социален модел за бъдещето
– having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2006 on a European Social Model for the future
Приети текстове , Р6_ТА (2006)0340 ,
Texts Adopted , P6-TA(2006)0340 . ,
– като взе предвид своята резолюция от 27 септември 2006 г. относно Бялата книга относно услугите от общ интерес
– having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2006 on the Commission White Paper on services of general interest
Приети текстове , Р6_ТА (2006)0380. ,
Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0380 . ,
– като взе предвид доклада на Комисията по заетост и социални въпроси и становищата на Комисията по икономически и парични въпроси, Комисията по околна среда, обществено здраве и безопасност на храните, Комисията по вътрешния пазар и защита на потребителите, Комисията по правни въпроси и Комисията по правата на жените и равенството между половете ( A6‑0057/2007 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6‑0057/2007 ),
А. като има предвид, че социалните услуги от общ интерес (SSGI) образуват един от трите стълба на Европейския социален модел, играят основна роля в гарантирането на гражданския мир и икономиката на Европейския съюз, социалното и териториално сближаване, и са едно от средствата за постигане на целите на Лисабонската стратегия,
A. whereas social services of general interest (SSGIs) form one of the pillars of the European social model, play an essential part in securing civic peace and the European Union’s economic, social and territorial cohesion, and are one of the means whereby the Lisbon Strategy objectives can be achieved,