Heard Mr. Mayanand Jha, Senior Advocate learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present petition has been preferred:

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that while taking up the land for acquisition only in the newspaper, the details were wrongly incorporated and the name of their father was also wrongly given. They objected regarding nature of the land repeatedly but award came to be passed and aggrieved by that, the writ petition.

4. Learned State counsel on the other hand points out that an award has now been passed. However, if the petitioners are aggrieved, they have the remedy before the Competent Authority. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani now after passing the order cannot review its own order.

5. In that background, the petitioners intend to approach the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Re-settlement Authority (LARRA) within a period of four weeks from today.

6. If the petitioners approach the concerned authority Patna High Court CWJC No.3388 of 2024(2) dt.20-06-2024 3/3 within a period of four weeks the limitation petition be considered taking into account that the writ petition was preferred before this Court.

7. Further, after hearing all the concerned parties, the Authority shall expedite the matter and dispose it of preferably within a period of six months from the date the petitioners approach the concerned authority.

8. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/-