% 14.07.2021 [VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

1. None appears for the petitioner.

2. The counsel for the respondents states that the only relief claimed in this petition was for time bound completion of Summary General Court Martial proceedings and which have been concluded and the petitioner has made a challenge with respect thereto before the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) and in view thereof this petition has become infructuous.

3. There is no reason to not believe the statement made by the counsel for the respondents and to act thereon.

4. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J AMIT BANSAL, J JULY 14, 2021 'pp'