Himachal Pradesh High Court

Piotr Muschalik vs . State Of H.P on 12 May, 2023

Bench:
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
,
Virender Singh

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Piotr Muschalik Vs. State of H.P

CWP No.934
of 2017

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Aakash Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Vandna
Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CMP No.5362 of 2023

r to
Before this application is considered, let the

petitioner can make an endeavor to have the 4th

respondent served through Dasti process. Let dasti notice

be issued to 4th respondent returnable for 28.6.2023, on

taking steps during the course of the day.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Avinash Kumar Vs. State of H.P and ors a/w connected matters

CWP No.962 of 2023 a/w CWP No.5945 of

.

2021 & CWP No.445 of 2022

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan and Mr. Anil Kumar,
Advocates, for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Sharmila Patial,
Deputy Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

List on 16th May, 2023.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Charan Singh & anr. Vs. Anoop Dutta and ors.

LPA No.54 of 2019

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate, for the
appellants.

Mr. G.C. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh

Kumar, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Ms. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate, for respondents No.5, 6
& 8.

Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate, for resondents No.7 and

9.

On the request of learned counsel for the parties,

list on 16.6.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge

12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dr. Pawan Kumar Banta Vs. M/s. Nirvana Woods and ors.

CWP No.7993 of 2022

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. N.K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

On the request of learned counsel for respondent

No.1, list on 15.5.2023.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Gain Chand Vs. State of H.P.
& connected matter

CWP No.1802 of 2023 a/w

.

CWP No.2071/2023

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner(s).

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,
Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State

As prayed for by the learned counsel for the

parties, list on 18.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
12.5.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Nuvision
Commercial and Escort Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2539/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2539/2023 and CMP No.5063/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondents No.4 and 5

have not been received back. Let fresh dasti notice for the

service of said respondents be issued returnable for

29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
12.5.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Nuvision
Commercial and Escort Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2540/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2540/2023 and CMP No.5064/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondents No.4 and 5

have not been received back. Let fresh dasti notice for the

service of said respondents be issued returnable for

29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
12.5.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Nuvision
Commercial and Escort Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2502/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2502/2023 and CMP No.4956/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondent No.5 has not

been received back. Let fresh dasti notice for the service

of said respondent be issued returnable for 29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Sampark
Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2506/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2506/2023 and CMP No.4975/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondent No.4 has been

received back duly served.

List on 29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Sampark
Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2510/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2510/2023 and CMP No.4979/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondent No.4 has been

received back duly served.

List on 29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.Sampark
Services Vs. State of H.P. & ors

CWP No.2508/2023

.

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr.Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

CWP No.2508/2023 and CMP No.4977/2023

Dasti notice issued to respondent No.4 has been

received back duly served. List on 29.5.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s. Indian Oil Corp. Letd. Vs. State of H.P and ors.

CMP No.5441 of 2023 in

.

CWP No.2026 of 2023

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Ramakant
Sharma, Additional Advocate General and

Mr.Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocte, for respondent No.6.

Heard for some time. Based upon material

available on record, we are of the considered view that

respondent No.6 is guilty of contempt of the orders of

the Court. Therefore, issue notice to the President of

respondent No.6, Shri Avinash Menon in form 1(i),

Contempt of Courts Act
.

In addition to that, since respondent No.6 has

clearly floated the orders of the court, Registrar Co-

operative society is directed to supersede the society

forthwith and appoint the administrator. In addition

to that, the Director General of Police is directed to

deploy additional police force of 50 personnels

alongwith Addiitonal S.P namely Shri Sanjeev Bhatia

to give effect to the orders passed by this Court.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

List on 16.5.2023. In the meanwhile, all the

respondents are directed to ensure that the orders

.

passed by this Court on 27.4.2023 read with today's

orders are complied with in letter and spirit. Fresh

status report be filed by Shri Sanjeev Bhatia on or

before the next date of hearing.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta/nisha)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

People for
Responsible Governance Vs. State of H.P and anr
a/w
connected matters

.

CWP No.2539 of 2023

12.5.2023 Present: Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh
Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Ramakant Sharma,
Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

r to
Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent-Forest
Corporation.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP
No.3241 of 2023.

Mr. Murari Lal Thakur, Co-ordinator, Bio-diversity
Board is present in person.

Ms. Sujata Sirkeck, Law Officer, Department of
Environment, Science and Technology also present
in person.

Dasti notices have not been received back and

therefore, let fresh dasti notice be issued for the service of

respondents No.4 and 5 returnable on 29th May, 2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
12.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Court on its own motion Vs. State of H.P and ors.

.

CWPIL No.203 of 2017 a/w CWPIL Nos.71, 77,

96, 100, 105 and 125 of 2018

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate as Amicus

Curiae with Mr.Gaurav Chaudhary, Advocate, in
CWPIL No. 203 of 2017.

Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.28 in
CWPIL Nos.71, 77 and 105 of 2018.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,
Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondents-

State.

List on 11.5.2023, when CEO of HIMUDA shall

personally appear before this Court along with the relevant

record pertaining to the Nalagarh Jail. Some responsible

officer, not below the rank of Joint/Special Secretary, shall

also appear before this Court along with the relevant record

pertaining to the creation of additional posts of various

categories for the newly under construction jail at Nalagarh,

i.e., Kishanpura. In addition thereto, SDM, Nalagarh shall also

remain present along with the relevant records.

Let copy of this order be sent by fax/E-

mail/Whatsapp to all the concerned officials. In the meanwhile,

the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Solan, is also

directed to visit the Kishanpura Jail, District Solan and submit

report regarding status of the construction and infrastructure

available at the spot including the shortcomings that are

coming in the way in shifting of the inmates to the said Jail.

Copy of this order be sent immediately to the Secretary District

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Legal Services Authority, Solan, through Member Secretary,

.

H.P. State Legal Services Authority.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023
(mamta) r

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Court on its own motion Vs. State of H.P and ors.

CWPIL No.2 of 2022

.

1.4.2023 Present: Mr. B.C. Negi, Sr. Advocate as Amicus Curiae with
Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Petitioner No.2 through Video Conferencing.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Ramakant Sharma,
Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for respondent-

No.5.

Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate, with Ms. Sneh
Bhimta, Advocate, for applicant/respondent No.37.

CMP Nos. 616 of 2023

Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate states that

the amount falling due towards the applicant as per

direction No.iii has been calculated and the same shall be

paid within three weeks from today. His Statement is

taken on record.

CWPIL No.2 of 2022

Since the paragliding schedule is to be held

from 5th April, 2023, respondent No.2 is directed to

demolish the offending pillars forthwith. List on

12.5.2023.

Compliance be reported by 3.4.2023. List on

3.4.2023 at 2.00 p.m. In the meanwhile, response to the

suggestions be filed. Respondents are directed to supply

their response to petitioner No.2 at least one week prior to

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

the date fixed. Special Area Development Authority

(SADA) & Town and Country Planning Department (TCP)

.

are also directed to ensure that no illegal constructions

are raised within its jurisdiction, more particularly at Bir

Billing, as is otherwise highlighted in the daily edition of

'The Tribune' dated 21.3.2023.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
1.4.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

People for
Responsible Governance Vs. State of H.P and anr
.

CWP No.4379 of 2019

.

1.4.2023 Present: Mr. Rajnish Maniktala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh
Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Ramakant Sharma,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat Chauhan,
Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent-Forest
Corporation.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant in CMP

No.3241 of 2023.

Mr. Murari Lal Thakur, Co-ordinator, Bio-diversity
Board is present in person.

Ms. Sujata Sirkeck, Law Officer, Department of

Environment, Science and Technology also present
in person.

CMP Nos.3241 of 2023

Before this application is considered on merits,

let the applicant therein first respond to the notices that

have been issued by the Board within one week, if not

already responded.

List on 12th April, 2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
1.4.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Anita Kumari Vs. State of H.P and ors
.

CWP No.1010 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appears

for
r and

reply/instructions.

is

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He

prays granted two weeks' time to file

List on 24.3.2023.

CMP Nos.2067 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Lucky Raj Vs. State of H.P

Cr.Appeal No.63 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondent-State.

Admit. Call for the records.

Taking
r into

Cr.MP Nos.657 of 2023

consideration the conviction

sentence as imposed by the Court below, no ground for
and

suspension is made out at this stage. Hence the

application is dismissed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)

Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Jyoti Parkash Vs. NHAI and ors
.

CWP No.728 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Devender Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Notice. Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Notice

to respondents No.2 and 3 be issued returnable for six weeks.

List on 12.5.2023.

CMP No.1478 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Vidya Devi Vs. State of H.P and ors
.

CWP No.1011 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appears

for
r and

reply/instructions.

is

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He

prays granted two weeks' time to file

List on 24.3.2023.

CMP Nos.2069 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dole Ram Vs. UOI and ors
.

CWP No.1016 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondents No.1 and

2.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents No.3 and 4-State.

r to
Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor

General of India and Mr.Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2

and 3, 4 respectively. Reply be filed within four weeks.

List on 21.4.2023.

CMP Nos.2084 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Nokhu Vs. UOI and ors
.

CWP No.992 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondents No.1 and

2.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents No.3 and 4-State.

r to
Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor

General of India and Mr.Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2

and 3, 4 respectively. Reply be filed within four weeks.

List on 21.4.2023.

CMP Nos.2053 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Manoj Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Cr.WP No.6 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents-State.

As prayed for, list on 21.4.2023.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge

10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Hari Ram Vs. Renuka Dam Project and ors
.

CWP No.1012 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. N.K. Tomar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Mishra. Advocate, for respondents No.1
and 2.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondent No.3-State.

r to
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted four weeks time to array co-sharers as necessary

parties to the petition.

List on 21.4.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Lucky Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP No.1014 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Owais Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks time to seek instructions.

List on 24.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge

10.3.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Prahlad Kumar Vs. State of H.P and ors.

CWP No.1025 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Notice. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

Reply be filed within four weeks.

List on 21.4.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge

10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Netar Singh Vs. State of H.P and ors
.

CWP No.1021 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 3 at this

stage.. Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of the said respondents. He prays

for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply/instructions.

List on 24.3.2023.

CMP Nos.2090 of 2023

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shailesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P

CWP No.1018 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. K.B.Khajuria, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondent-State.

Notice. Mr. Y.W. Chauhan, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondent. Reply/instructions be filed/obtained

well before the next date of hearing.

List on 17.3.2023, when U.O note No.11326 be

produced by the respondent.

CMP No.2086 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. In the

meanwhile, the implementation and execution of order

dated 6.3.2023 (Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Tej Singh Vs. HRTC and ors
.

CWP No.1029 of 2023

.

10.3.2023 Present: Mr. S.P. Chatterji, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.

Notice. Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

Reply/instructions be filed/obtained well before the next date

of hearing. r
List on 24.3.2023.

CMP No.2107 of 2023

Notice in the aforesaid terms. In the

meanwhile, the implementation and execution of order

dated 1.2.2023 (Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
10.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Phool Chand Vs. NHAI and anr
.

CWP No.5196 of 2022

.

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Amit Himalvi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sneh
Bhimta, Advocate, for the respondents.

List on 15.3.2023 alongwith CWPIL No.249 of 2017.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge

9.3.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Mohinder Singh and oras. Vs. HRTC & anr
a/w connected matter.

.

CWP No.1879 of 2022 a/w

CWP No.2301 of 2022

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh
Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP

No.1879 of 2022.

Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No.2301 of 2022.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for respondent No.1 in
both the petitions.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,

Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the

respondents-State.

Learned counsel for respondent No.1-HRTC seeks time

to obtain instructions.

List on 14.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Umesh Sati Vs. HRTC
& ors. a/w connected matters.

CWP No.3911 of 2022 a/w CWP Nos.3908,

.

3913, 3928, 3929, 3930, 3936, 3943, 3952,

3955, 4007 and 4515 of 2022

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. D.N. Sharma, Mr. Prashant Sharma, Mr. Karan
Singh Parmar and Mr. Rohit Chauhan, Advocates,

for the petitioner(s) in the respective petitions.

Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for the respondents-
HRTC in all the petitions except CWP No.4007 of
2022.

Mr. Pankaj Chaudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Vikas
Rajput, Advocate, for respondents in CWP No.4007
of 2022.

CMP No.1877 of 2023 in CWP No.3911 of 2022
CMP No.1906 of 2023 in CWP No.3908 of 2022
CMP No.1878 of 2023 in CWP No.3913 of 2022
CMP No.1882 of 2023 in CWP No.3929 of 2022

CMP No.1883 of 2023 in CWP No.3930 of 2022
CMP No.1876 of 2023 in CWP No.3936 of 2022
CMP No.1885 of 2023 in CWP No.3943 of 2022
CMP No.1879 of 2023 in CWP No.3952 of 2022

CMP No.1880 of 2023 in CWP No.3955 of 2022

Notice. Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, appears and waives

service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Notice be

issued to respondent No.4 returnable for four weeks.

List on 13.4.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dhram Singh Vs. State of H.P.

CWP No.5092 of 2022

.

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted ten days time to file rejoinder. Registry is directed not

to reflect the name of Mr.Chitranjan Kumar Sharma, Advocate

for respondent No.3, as respondent No.3 stands deleted from

the array of respondents vide order dated 1.12.2022.

List on 23.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dr. Sanjeev Thakur Vs. State of H.P and anr
.

CWP No.4278 of 2022

.

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner

stands filed. Counter affidavit be filed within two weeks.

List for consideration on 23.3.2023.

CMP Nos.8506 and 8507 of 2022

Allowed as prayed for. The applicant-petitioner

is directed to file translated copies of vernacular

documents and typed copies of annexures within four

weeks. The applications stand disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Madan Lal Vs. The Headmaster Lawrence School Sanawar and anr
.

LPA No.15 of 2016

.

9.3.2023 Present: Ms. Manjula Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

r to
As jointly prayed for, list on 13.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Nagin Chand Vs. State of H.P. and ors
,

.

LPA No.9 of 2016

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

r to
None for respondent No.6.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 16.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)

Judge
9.3.2023

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs.
Ankita Deposits & Advances Pvt. Ltd
.

.

ITA No.8 of 2015

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Vishal Mohan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Aditya Sood, Advocate, for the respondent.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 23.3.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.3.2023

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Amar Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP No.5478 of 2022

.

9.3.2023 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. Y.W. Chauhan,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents No.1 to 6-State.

Mr. Sanjeev Mankotia, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.

Mr.Anil Kapoor, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.8.

List on 13.3.2023, when positive instructions be

obtained by the State as to why the eviction order, which has

been passed, has not been executed on the spot.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Virender Singh)

Judge
9.3.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
H.P Marketing Procssing Corp. Ltd. Vs. Regional
Provident Fund Commisioner and ors
.

.

CWP No.4672 of 2021

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit
Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Central Government Counsel,
for respondent No.4.

Admit.

Pleadings be completed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Raksha Pal Kaundal Vs. State of H.P. and Ors
.

CWP No.4465 of 2021

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for
respondents No.6 to 10.

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate states that in

three days, his client would be depositing a sum of Rs.5 lacs in

the Registry of this Court. His statement is taken on record.

List on 27.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dev Sanskriti Charitable Trust Kullu Vs. State of H.P. and Ors
.

CWP No.3956 of 2015

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Anand Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Karan
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the

respondents-State.

Heard in part. After having heard the arguments for

considerable time, we feel that there are certain aspects in the

reply, which needs to be clarified, more particularly regarding

the relationship of landlord and tenant between the cultivator

and the owners, i.e., Devta.

Apart from that, even the applicability of Abolition of

Big Landed Estate Act, 1953 and
H.P Tenancy and Land

Reforms Act, 1972
is required to be clarified as to whether

these Acts would per se apply to the case of the Devtas and in

addition to the aforesaid, there appears to be contradiction in

para 4 of the reply filed by the respondents to the writ petition,

where at the first place, it has been mentioned that the excess

land owned by the Devta was vested with the State

Government and thereafter, transferred to the tenants

(Annexure A/3). Whereas in the subsequent para, it has been

denied that the land of the Devta has been transferred to the

name of the tenants solely on the basis of the aforesaid Acts.

Let a comprehensive affidavit in this regard be filed on or

before the next date of hearing.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

List on 11.7.2022. It is made clear that queries have

been raised by this Court without going into the question

.

regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, as raised by

the respondents.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)
r to (Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rajni Joshi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP No.7505 of 2021

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

r to
Delinked from CWP No.4133 of 2021.

Rejoinder be filed within two weeks.

List on 4.7.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Nimi Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors
.

CWPOA No.7514 of 2020

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. K.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Admit. to
Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Reply be filed within two weeks.

List before Hon'ble SB-IV (Justice Ajay Mohan Goel)

on 7.7.2022 alongwith CMP.M No.1834 of 2019 titled
State Vs.

Mukesh Kumari and others
.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Neema Malhotra Vs. State of H.P. and ors
.

CWPOA No.7512 of 2020

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. K.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Admit. to
Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Reply be filed within two weeks.

List before Hon'ble SB-IV (Justice Ajay Mohan Goel)

on 7.7.2022 alongwith CMP.M No.1834 of 2019 titled
State Vs.

Mukesh Kumari and others
.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dayavati and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWPOA No.6057 of 2020

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. K.K. Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Admit. to
Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.4 has been filed. Let

the same on behalf of other respondents be filed within two

weeks.

List before Hon'ble SB-IV (Justice Ajay Mohan Goel)

on 7.7.2022 alongwith CMP.M No.1834 of 2019 titled
State Vs.

Mukesh Kumari and others
.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Mohinder Verma and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP No.1787 of 2020

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Ajay Kumar,
Advocate for the petitioners.

. Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the

respondents-State.

Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Karun
Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.

Mr. N.K. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 7.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.8.

CMP No.4909 of 2021

Reply to the application is stated to have been filed on

18.6.2022. Let the same be placed on record . Copies thereof

be supplied to the respective parties.

List for consideration on 27.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Narinder Dutt Sharma Vs. State of H.P. and ors
.

CWP No.2813 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

List on 22.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Nameeta Rana Vs. HPU

CWP No.2631 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder.

r to
List on 4.7.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shashi Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and ors
.

CWP No.2489 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

Both the contesting parties pray for time to place on

record additional documents. Permission granted.

List on 23.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Saroj Devi Vs. State of H.P. and ors
.

CWP No.2469 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

No.3.

Admit. to
Mr. Chitranjan Kumar Sharma, CGC, for respondent

Pleadings be completed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Kundlas Loh Udyog Vs. HPSEB and ors
.

CWP No.1018 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manik
Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur

and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Admit.

Pleadings be completed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Kapoor Singh and anr. Vs. Dr. YS Parmar Univ. and ors.

CWP No.769 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate, for respondent No.1

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate

Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

At the request of learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.1, list on 11.7.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Mahavir Roadlines Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd. And ors
.

.

CWP No.7542 of 2021

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner,

list on 14.7.2022.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022

(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Chuni Lal and ors. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

CWP No.2157 of 2022

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur
and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Admit.

r to

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
20.6.2022
(
mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shashi Kumar sharma, Vs. PNB and ors
.

CWP No.1148 of 2020

.

20.6.2022 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

. Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents.

Supplementary affidavit, as appearing from page

Nos.53 to 82 is ordered to be detached and placed in the case

file of CWP No.589 of 2019.

List on 27.6.2022.

CWP No.589 of 2019 be also listed alongwith this case

on the date given.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
20.6.2022
(mamta/raman)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr.Addl,A.G., Mr.Shiv Pal
Manhans, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhupindter
Thakur and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate

.

Generals and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondents-

State.

r to

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Jai Bharti Education Trust Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2930 of 2018

.

2.5.2022 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur and Mr. Yudhvir
Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate for respondent

No.3-Board.

Delink from CWP No.4113 of 2019.

List on 30.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

2.5.2022
(
mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Harvinder Kaur Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2647 of 2022

.

2.5.2022 Present: Mr. Balwant Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Rita Goswami and Mr. Nand Lal Thakur,
Additional Advocate Generals, for the

respondents-State.

Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3.

Mr. Suresh Saini, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Caveat petition No. 186/2022

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6666/2021 & CMP No. 12588/2021

Notice. Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate and Mr. Suresh

Saini, Advocate appear and waive service of notice on behalf of

the respective respondents.

Let records of the case be produced on the next date

of hearing.

List on 5.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
2.5.2022
(
mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Soni Kumar Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2649 of 2022

.

2.5.2022 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Ms. Ritta
Goswami and Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Additional

Advocate Generals, for the respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

transfer of the petitioner has been effected solely on the basis

of D.O Note bearing No.386791 dated 4.4.2022.

r In such circumstances, issue notice. Mr. Nand Lal

Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2.

Issue Dasti notice for the service of respondent No.3 returnable

for 23.5.2022.

CMP No.5035 of 2022

Notice in the aforesaid terms. In the meanwhile,

operation and execution of impugned order of transfer dated

25.4.2022 (Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

List on 23.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
2.5.2022
(
mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Gaurav Keprate Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.6584 of 2021

.

2.5.2022 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Bhupindter Thakur and Mr. Yudhvir
Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Ms. Vandna Misra, Advocate for respondents No.5 and

6.

This petition was disposed of vide order dated

26.11.2021, the operative portion whereof reads as under:-

"4.In view of the aforesaid, we direct the
petitioner to approach this new Committee during

the course of the day and supply the requisite
documents as undertaken within a week from
today. In case the petitioner approaches the said

Committee during the course of the day and

supply the necessary documents as undertaken
within a week, the Committee shall consider and
decide the issue, in accordance with law, within

two weeks thereafter."

Today, the respondents have handed over the

instructions, which goes to reveal that in replies to the final

orders passed by this Court, the matter was examined in detail

by the Committee, so constituted for this purpose. On brief

examination of the instant case, the technical parameters as

formed by the Committee are as under:-

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Description As per submitted proposal Remarks

.

Layout and site Plan of In order.

Proposed Layout
proposed Retail Outlet duly
approved by Bharat
Petroleum Corporation Ltd

Built-up Area 16.0 Sqm. Sales Room, Public Toilet
and Electric Room. Canopy
over filling stations with
over all height of 6.9 mtrs.

Is also proposed.

Set Backs - As per approved layout of
BPCL
NOC for fire and Life Safety Submitted
r In order.

NOC from HPPWD Submitted In order.

Soil Investigation/Geological Submitted In order.
Report
Hill Cut More than 3.5 meter has Relaxations required for hill
been proposed at rear end in cutting beyond permissible
steps of 3.5 mtrs each, with limit of 3.5 mtrs.

total height of 28 mtrs.

Slope Analysis Report As per three cross sections The detailed slope analysis
shown in the site Plan, slope report of HPPWD shows the

has been shown as 41, 43 and overall contours and degree

44. of slope at 52

Relaxation is required.

The petrol pumps have been classified to be an essential

commodity as per Section 2A & Schedule 1 of the
Essential

Commodities Act, 1955
. For the development of the land in

question, the following general regulations of Appendix-I of

HPTCP Rules, 2014 are applicable:

"III. General Regulations
The following provisions shall be applicable where no
specific mention is made, namely:-

3. Maximum acceptable slope for development shall be
45 degrees.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

II. Maximum hill cut of 3.50 Metre height shall be
permissible."

.

Section 28 of the H.P Town and Country Planning Rules,

2014 reads as under:-

"28. Relaxation in setbacks, height of floors

and building etc. may be allowed in Government
projects in the public interest. In case of private
construction/projects relaxation in setbacks,

height of floors and building etc. may be
considered by the Competent Authority keeping
in view the site conditions. However, in private

projects having plot area of more than one

hectare, relaxation shall be allowed by the State
Government only.

According to the Technical Committee, after

examining the technical and legal aspects of the case, it was

found that the case of the petitioner for proposed construction

of retail outlet pump as stated above is a public utility and is

located in Non-Core Area of Shimla Planning Area.

Furthermore, the Committee also found that the construction

proposed is not in relation to building construction but only for

the development of land/site in question and, therefore,

following two relaxations are required in the instant case:-

i. Hill cutting beyond permissible limits of 3.50 mtrs.

ii. Relaxation in overall slope of the site from 52

degrees to 45 degrees.

As regards the first relaxation, it is not in dispute that

only application for sanctioning of plans for construction are

required to be submitted to the concerned department, which

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

in turn shall then ensure that no construction activity takes

place where the slope is more than 45 degrees/35 degrees.

.

As regards the second relaxation, the proposal for retail

petrol pump outlet is to be constructed in and around 20

metres of the total plot area and this condition is duly fulfilled

by the petitioner. Once that be so, obviously, the slope where

the construction is proposed will naturally be less than 45

degrees once the hill cutting is carried out.

In such circumstances, we direct the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioner for relaxation as aforesaid

within a period of two weeks from today.

For compliance to come up on 23.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

2.5.2022
(mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
APJ Laboratories Vs. The Himachal Pradesh State
Cooperative Bank Limited

CWP No.7719 of 2021

.

2.5.2022 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate for
the respondent.

Shri Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate prays for

an adjournment on the ground that he has to go to hospital in

connection with the medical check up. Granted as not

opposed. r List 9.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

2.5.2022
(
mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Vinod Kumar Guleria Vs. H.P University and ors
.

CWP No.5533 of 2020

.

2.5.2022 Present: Ms. Divya Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. R.L.
Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondents

No.1 and 2.

Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

At the request of learned counsel appearing on behalf of

r to
the petitioner, list on 23.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
2.5.2022
(
mamta/himani)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Uttam Chand Vs. State of H.P

Cr.MP No.875
of 2022 in Cr.A.45 of 2009

.

19.4.2022 Present: None for the applicant.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondent-State.

Letter sent by the wife of the convict has been treated

as a petition. Let three copies of this petition be supplied to

the office of the learned Advocate General, so as to enable it to

obtain instructions.

Issue notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondent-State. Reply be filed within six weeks.

List on 14.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Vikas Sharma Vs. Director Transport, H.P and others

CWP No.6678 of 2021

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General

compliance affidavit.

r to
prays for and is granted two weeks further time to file

List on 10.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Drishti Stone Crusher Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.6424 of 2021

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Since consent to operate stone crusher has already

been granted to the petitioner, therefore, no further orders are

required to be passed in this petition.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
19.4.2022

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Manorma Worker Welfare Association Stone Crusher
Vs. State of H.P and others

.

CWP No.6416 of 2021

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks further time to comply with the directions

passed by the H.P State Pollution Control Board.

List on 10.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Raj Kumar Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2046 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Complete records pertaining to the transfer of the

petitioner be produced on the next date of hearing.

List on 26.4.2022. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Yashpal Singh Sandhu Vs. State of H.P
a/w connected matters

CWP No.1648 of 2018 a/w CWP No. 63/2019,

.

COPC Nos.115 & 240 of 2019

CWP No.1648 of 2018 & COPC Nos.115 & 240 of 2019

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathore, Advocate for the

petitioner(s).

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate

General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent

No.6.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.

Mr. Mehar Chand Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent

No.9 alongwith respondent No.9.

Shri Rajesh Sharma, Senior Draftsman, Municipal
Corporation, Dharamshala, present in person.

CWP No.63 of 2019

Mr. Mehar Chand Jamwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

After having heard the learned counsel for the parties

for a considerable time, we are of the view that the version of

H.P.PWD is necessary with regard to the applicability and

thereafter grant of permission under
H.P Roadside Pollution

Control Act, 1968
. Therefore, HP.PWD NH Division through its

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Executive Engineer, Shahpur Division, Dharamshala is ordered

to be impleaded as party respondent, who shall figure as

.

respondent No.17.

Issue notice for the service of newly added

respondent. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

said respondent. He prays for and is granted three weeks time

to file reply.

r to
Let one copy of the petition alongwith all the

annexures be supplied to the office of the learned Advocate

General within two days from today.

List for consideration on 17.5.2022.

Presence of the persons present today is dispensed

with till further orders.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2058 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Reply be filed within three weeks. Registry is directed

to reflect the name of Shri Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate in the

cause list henceforth.

List on 17.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rakesh Kumar Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.2058 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Reply be filed within three weeks. Registry is directed

to reflect the name of Shri Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate in the

cause list henceforth.

List on 17.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Des Paul Vs. HRTC and another

CWP No.6382 of 2021

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents on instructions

states that more than half of the retiral amount stands paid to

the petitioner and remaining amount shall be remitted to the

account of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from

today. His statement is taken on record.

List on 21.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Suresh Kumar and anr. Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.1928 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista and Mr. Shivom Vashista,
Advocates, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate

General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the

issue in question is squarely covered by a judgment rendered

by a Full Bench of this Court in CWP No.2711 of 2017 titled

Baldev Singh Vs. State of H.P
, decided on 22.2.2022.

In such circumstances, issue notice to the

respondents. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate,

appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents

No.1 to 3 and 4 respectively.

Mr. Vaidya, learned Senior Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted two weeks time to obtain

instructions in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in

Baldev Singh
's case (supra).

List on 10.5.2022.

CMP No.3598 of 2022

Allowed as prayed for. The applicants-petitioners

shall file the relevant extract of Annexures in question,

within a period of two weeks and are exempted from filing

typed complete documents of annexures in question. The

application stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

.

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

State of H.P and another Vs. Sh. Tarun Mahindru

Arb.Appeal No.1 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the

appellants/applicants/State.

Steps for the service of sole respondent not taken.

Let the needful be done within two days failing which the

appeal shall be deemed to be dismissed for want of prosecution

without further reference to the Court. In the event of steps

being taken within the stipulated period, notice be issued to

the respondent returnable for 14.6.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Suresh Kumar and another Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.1927 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate for the
petitioners.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate

General, for the respondents-State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Admit.

CMP No.3597 of 2022

Allowed as prayed for. The applicants-petitioners

shall file the relevant extract of Annexures in question,

within a period of six weeks and are exempted from filing

typed complete documents of annexures in question. The

application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Mandeep Bhadyaria Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.884 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate
General, for respondents No.1 and 4-State.

Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.2 and 3.

CMP No. _______ in CWP No.884 of 2022

Heard. Application be registered.

Taking into consideration the averments made in

this application, we deem it proper to grant four weeks

time to the respondents for filing compliance affidavit.

The application stands disposed of.

To come up for compliance on 24.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dev Raj Vs. State of H.P and others
a/w connected matters

Ex.Pet. No.42 of 2019 a/w Ex.Pet. Nos. 43

.

of 2019, 199, 201 and 207 of 2021

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,
Advocate, for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

No.3
r to

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent

State has placed on record the instructions dated

18.4.2022. This Court is not at all satisfied with the contents

of the instructions regarding filing of the appeals/writ petitions

in higher Appellate Courts against the decisions rendered by

this Court.

Confronted with this, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General prays for and is granted a weeks time to file

fresh instructions.

List on 26.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Laajender Singh Pathania Vs. State of H.P

CWP No.4623 of 2021

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for the
respondents-State.

CMP No.4218 of 2022

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of

respondents-State.

Reply be filed within four weeks.

List on 24.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Yash Pal Vs. State of H.P and another

CWP No.1926 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate for the
petitioners.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

CMP No.3595 and 3596 of 2022

Allowed as prayed for. The applicants-petitioners

shall file the relevant extract of Annexures in question,

within a period of six weeks and are exempted from filing

typed complete documents of annexures in question. The

applications stand disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.1817 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate for the
petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Kunja Ram Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.1818 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate for the
petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

19.4.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Hoshiyar Singh Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.277 of 2022

.

19.4.2022 Present: Mr. Paresh Sharma, Advocate for the
petitioner.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Senior Additional Advocate

General, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate
General, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate
General and Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has

filed amended writ petition but the same is lying under

objection. He undertakes to remove the objections.

List on 10.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

19.4.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ritu Bala and anr. Vs. HP Staff Selection Commission

CWP No.1541 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate for the
petitioners.

Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent has placed on

record instructions dated 21.3.2022 showing that the

Commission has already issued directions to take essential

qualification related documents through notice dated 8.3.2022.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that his

clients have already submitted BA.B.Ed documents to the

Commission. If that be so, their candidature shall not be

rejected by the commission for the post of JBT till further

orders. This order however shall be subject to the orders that

may be passed in Review Petition Nos. 10 and 11 of 2020.

Reply to the petition be filed within four weeks.

List on 26.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Jagir Singh Vs. B.B.M. Board and another

CWP No.1452 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Kulwant Chauhan, Advocate for the
petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

List on 29.3.2022, as prayed for.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Devi Dass Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.1195 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

Leaving all question of law open, Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
r Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Bhagat Singh and anr. Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.8383 of 2021

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Imran Khan, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

The respondents have placed on record the

instructions dated 21.3.2022, according to which, DPC has

been convened but the name of the petitioner is not mentioned

in the DPC, Let formal reply be filed by the respondents within

four weeks.

List on 26.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shilpa Thakur Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.8359 of 2021

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondent No.1-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

r to
Formal affidavit on behalf of respondents is stated to

have been filed on 21.3.2022, however, the same is not on

record. Registry is directed to trace the same and place it on

record, even if it is under objections.

Now, Sikkim Manipal University and Patna University

are yet to impart instructions. Therefore, both the Universities

are directed to impart instructions to the office of Secretary

(Education) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh as

expeditiously as possible and in no event later than a fortnight

from today.

Copy of this order be sent by the Registry to the

concerned Universities through fax and e-mail within 48 hours.

List on 12.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(
mamta)

Devi Dass Vs. State of H.P and ors

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1195 of 2022

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.
Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for

the respondents-State.

Leaving all question of law open, Admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rajeev Singh Vs. State of H.P and anr.

CWP No.1419 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Loveneesh Singh Thakur Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.

Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.
Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondent No.1-State.

Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Rajinder Thakur, learned counsel for respondent

No.2 has placed on record instructions dated 21.3.2022.

However, the matter cannot be decided solely on the basis of

the instructions. Therefore, a formal reply be filed within one

week. Rejoinder thereof be also filed within one week

thereafter.

List for consideration on 12.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Tek Ram Vs. Union of India and anr
.

CWP No.1299 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.
Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondent-State.

r to
Reply to the petition be filed within six weeks.

List on 10.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Sarita Negi Vs. State of H.P and ors
.

CWP No.1296 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate General
for the respondents-State.

Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Sneh Bhimta,
Advocate for respondents No.5 to 8.

None for respondent No.9.

Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 19.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Suram Singh and ors. Vs. State of H.P and anr.

CWP No.650 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
respondent-State.

Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

r to
Reply to the petition be filed within two weeks.

List on 12.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Kundlas Loh Udyog Vs. HPSEB and others

CWP No.1018 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Manik
Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.
Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for

respondent No.2-State.

Mr. N.K. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sharma,
Advocate, for respondent No.3

Record reveals that the petitioner though has filed

rejoinder but there is no formal reply on behalf of the

respondents. Let formal reply be filed within one week.

As prayed for, respondent No.3 is ordered to be

deleted from the array of respondents subject to just

exceptions.

List on 29.3.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Krishan Lal Vs. State of H.P and ors

CWP No.1184 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.
Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and

Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

It would be noticed that the petitioner filed an

application for cancellation of mutation, which was sanctioned

as far back as on 30.8.1975. This application was filed after

more than 45 years of sanction of the mutation. Yet, it has not

only been entertained by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi,

but he in turn has called for the report of Tehsildar Balh,

district Mandi.

It is really surprising as to how the Deputy

Commissioner, Mandi could have called for the report without

going into the question whether the application filed by the

petitioner was within prescribed period of limitation and the

same was either maintainable. Even otherwise, no provisions

of law have been quoted in the application, which could

indicate the jurisdiction of the Collector/Deputy

Commissioner, Mandi.

In such circumstances, issue notice. Mr. Vinod

Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

Reply/instructions be filed within six weeks. In the

meanwhile, further proceedings in the application for

cancellation of mutation filed by the petitioner, which is stated

to be pending before second respondent, shall remain stayed.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

List on 10.5.2022.

CMP No.1959 of 2022

.

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and

the applicant is exempted from filing the English

translation of Annexures in question. The application

stands disposed of.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Bhupendra Singh Vs. State of H.P and another

CWP No.1173 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Dheeraj Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

Leaving all question of law open, Admit.

Tag alongwith CWP No.8032 of 2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
22.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Charrian Behal Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.1174 of 2022

.

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Dheeraj Kanwar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Additional Advocate General, Mr.

Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy Advocate General and
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer, for
the respondents-State.

Leaving all question of law open, Admit.

Tag alongwith CWP No.8032 of 2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
22.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Santosh Kumar and others Vs. State of H.P and others

.

CWP No.1169 of 2022

22.3.2022 Present: Mr. Yogesh K. Chandel, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr.Addl.A.G, for the
respondents-State.

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners,

who are posted at different places throughout the State. Mr.

Ajay Vaidya, learned Senior Additional Advocate General states

that it would be difficult for them to file reply by calling all the

particulars of each of the petitioners from different stations

which is practically impossible. In such circumstances, we

deem it proper to treat this petition as filed by petitioner No.1.

As far as the remaining petitioners are concerned, they are at

liberty to file separate petitions.

In case such individual petitions are filed by other

petitioners except petitioner No.1, then they will be exempted

from filing court fee as the same already stands fixed in this

petition.

Notice. Mr. Vaidya, learned Senior Additional Advocate

General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondents. Reply be filed within six weeks. Tag alongwith

CWP No.7389 of 2021.

CMP No. 1948/2021

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and the

applicant is exempted from filing the complete photocopies

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

of Annexures in question. The application stands disposed

of.

.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
22.3.2022

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

H.P Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. Vs. Principal
Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla

.

ITA No.38 of 2015 a/w ITA No.30 of 2015, 31

and 32 of 2014, 5, 8 and 34 of 2016, ITA Nos.
18, 24, 48, 69 of 2017 and ITA Nos. 76, 77, 78,
98 and 120 of 2018 & 3 and 4 of 2019

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Aditya Sood, Mr. Praveen Sharma and Ms.
Sameeksha Gupta, Advocates for the appellant(s).

Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate with Mr. Diwan
Singh, Advocate, for respondent(s).

Supreme Court.

r to
Learned counsel ff7989or the respondent states that

identical issues are pending consideration before Hon'ble

As prayed for, list all theses cases for

consideration on 13.6.2022.

However, liberty is reserved to the parties to make

a mention if the matter is conclusively decided by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court earlier to the aforesaid period.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
21.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Kehar Singh Vs. HRTC and others

CWP No.7411 of 2021

.

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Divya Pathania, Advocate vice Mr. Shubh
Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents.

Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 4.4.2022.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
21.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shiv Ram Vs. HRTC and others

CWP No.7412 of 2021

.

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Divya Pathania, Advocate vice Mr. Shubh
Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents.

Reply be filed on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 4.4.2022.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
21.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Balwan Singh and another Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.7322 of 2021

.

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Abhebdra Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate Generals and Mr. Yudhvir Thakur & Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents-State.

Admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

21.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
H.P Marketing Processing Corporationn Ltd. Vs. The
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & others

.

CWP No.4672 of 2021

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondents No.1

and 2.

Mr.Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate for respondent No.3.

None for respondent No.4.

Despite ample opportunities having been granted to

file the reply on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4, the

respondents have failed to do so. As a matter of sheer

indulgence and by way of last opportunity, two weeks' further

time is granted to file the reply, failing which the erring

respondents shall personally appear before this Court

alongwith the relevant records on the next date of hearing.

List on 4.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
21.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Nehar Singh & others Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.7912 of 2021

.

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Daleep Singh Kaisth, Advocate for the
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.

Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals and Mr. Yudhvir Thakur & Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents-State.

Reply be filed within three weeks. Interim to

continue till next date.

List on 11.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

21.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s.
Shree J.k. Foods Private Ltd. Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No.7049 of 2021 a/w

.

CWP No.7145 of 2021

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the
petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals and Mr. Yudhvir Thakur & Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the
respondents-State.

petitions.

r to
Mr. B.C. Verma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Peeyush
Verma, Advocate for respondent No.3 in both the

List on 28.3.2022, as prayed for.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

21.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Shriram Hospital through its
Managing Partner Vs.
Employees Provident Fund Organization and others

.

CWP No.6429 of 2021

21.3.2022 Present: Mr. B.C. Negi, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate for the petitioner/non-applicant.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate for the respondents/
applicants.

CMP No.2599 of 2022

Notice. Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the petitioner. He prays

for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply/instructions.

Rejoinder to the writ petition be also filed on or before

the next date of hearing. Interim order to continue.

List on 4.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
21.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dile Ram Vs. Kanta Devi

FAO (FC) No.22 of 2021

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for the appellant-

applicant.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate. for the
respondent/non-applicant

CMP No.15305/2021 & CMP(M) No.1220/2021

Notice. Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondent. He prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file

reply/instructions.2599

List on 29.3.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

15.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

M/s. APJ laboratories Vs. The H.P. State Cooperative Bank Ltd.

CWP No.7719 of 2021

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate. for the

respondent.

The petitioner has failed to abide by the order

dated 4.1.2022 whereby undertaking was given before this

the
Contempt of Courts Act
.

Court to deposit the amount, and in terms of Para 4 of the

order passed on 4.1.2022, he is liable to be prosecuted under

Para 4 of the order reads as

under:-

"4. The petitioner is yet to deposit an

amount as undertaken by him. The needful be
done by 28.2.2022, as already undertaken by the
petitioner, failing which in addition to any other

action, which may be taken against the petitioner,

the Director of Companies shall be liable to be
prosecuted under the
Contempt of Courts Act
. It

is made clear that in the event of the petitioner
depositing an outstanding amount, as undertaken
by him, the respondent-Bank in turn shall
immediately issue necessary NOCs and if
permissible release the security simultaneously."

Therefore, Mr. B.K. Sharma, authorized

representative of the petitioner-company, on whose affidavit

this petition has been filed before this Court, is directed to

personally appear before this Court on the next date of hearing

to answer the charges that may be framed against him.

List on 22.3.2022.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

.

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Surender Kumar Vs. IOC & another

CWP No.7853 of 2014

.

15.3.2022 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. H.R, Thakur,

Advocate. for respondents No.1

Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

As prayed for, list on 22.3.2022.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

15.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rakesh Kumar Vs. HPSEB
.

CWPOA No.7989 of 2019 alongwith CWPOA Nos. 164, 168,

.

170, 184, 561 an 811 of 2020

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Shweta Joolka, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate. for the
respondents.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate
General for the respondents-State.

List on 22.3.2022. Registry is directed to reflect

the designation of learned Advocate General in the cause list

henceforth.

Learned Deputy Advocate General to obtain

specific instructions as to whether the Board, that is required

to consider the cases under the Rights of Persons with

Disabilities Act, 2016
has been constituted or not.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

K.S. Tomar Vs. State of H.P and anr
.

CWP No. 1331 of 2020

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Surinder
Saklani, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.

Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law
Officer, for the respondents-State.

In the instructions dated 5.11.2020 filed by the

respondents, it has been stated that same subject matter is

pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Confronted with

this, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted

one week's time to go through the records of the case.

List on 22.3.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Sonologist Association Himachal Vs. UoI and others

CWP No. 1654 of 2020

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent-Medical
Council of India.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr.Addl.A.G, for the respondents-
State.

Since one of the issues is sub judice before the

Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, consideration of the present

case is deferred by six weeks.

List on 10.5.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
15.3.2022

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Rajinder Kumar Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No. 8240 of 2021

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law
Officer, for the respondents-State.

It appears that the respondents are not at all clear

with regard to issuance of NOC from the Mining Department.

Let the Directorate of Industries as well as Forest Department

together take a decision with respect to this and the same be

conveyed on the next date of hearing.

List on 22.3.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Amit Sharma Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No. 8241 of 2021

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional

Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law
Officer, for the respondents-State.

It appears that the respondents are not at all clear

with regard to issuance of NOC from the Mining Department.

Let the Directorate of Industries as well as Forest Department

together take a decision with respect to this and the same be

conveyed on the next date of hearing.

List on 22.3.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Dr. Rajat Puri Vs. State of H.P and another

CWP No.6948 of 2021

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Atul Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner/non-

applicant

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.

Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law
Officer, for the respondents/applicants.

CMP No.2313 of 2022

r The respondents have filed this application for

extension of time for filing reply to the writ petition. In the

application, it has been stated that the matter is under

consideration at the Government level and it will take some

time to decide the same and reply can be filed only after

receiving the necessary clarifications/decision from the

Government. The application has been filed by the Director,

Animal Husbandry, Himachal Pradesh, which is none other

than the State Government of Himachal Pradesh. Therefore,

we made it clear that no such application at the level of

Director, Animal Husbandry shall be maintainable before this

Court when matter is pending before the State Government

and further, whenever, State seeks extension of time, it shall

be on the affidavit of Chief Secretary/Additional Chief

Secretary/Secretary/Under Secretary, as the case may be.

At the request of Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned

Additional Advocate General, we deem it proper to grant six

weeks time to file reply to the writ petition. Application stands

disposed of.

List the matter on 10.5.2022.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

.

Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)

Judge
15.3.2022
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board Vs. State of H.P and others

CWP No. 47 of 2022

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. R.K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.

Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law
Officer, for the respondents-State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Yashwardhan Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for
proposed respondents in CMP No.2448/2022

CMP No2395/2022

This application has been filed by the State for the

vacation of stay granted vide order dated 4.1.2022, qua the

properties which does not pertain to the petitioner. This Court

vide orders dated 4.1.2022 has stayed the operation and

execution of impugned letter dated 1.6.2020 (Annexure P-31)

constraining the State to file the present application.

The application is allowed and we clarify that the

stay granted by this Court vide order dated 4.1.2022 shall

apply only to the properties mentioned at Sr.No.2 of the letter

dated 1.6.2020, i.e., qua the properties of the non-

applicant/petitioner. Application stands disposed of

accordingly.

CMP No.2448 of 2022

Issue notice. Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate,

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General and

Mr. Balram Sharma, learned ASGI waive service of notices on

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

behalf of the petitioner and respondents respectively. Reply be

filed within four weeks.

.

Reply to the writ petition be also filed within the

aforesaid time.

List on 19.4.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

15.3.2022
(mamta)
r to (Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Distt.
Treasury Officer Mandi Vs. Smt. Indu Devi

RPT No. 1 of 2020

.

15.3.2022 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr.
Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional
Advocate Generals, Mr. Yudhvir Thakur, Deputy
Advocate General & Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law

Officer. for the petitioners-State.

Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

CMP.M No.1118/2021 & CMP.M No.1089/2021

List on 22.3.2022, as prayed for.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
Judge
15.3.2022
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7568/2021

1.12.2021 Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-State.

CWP No. 7568/2021 & CMP No. 14204/2021

Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 4 at this

stage. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents

No. 1 to 4.

List on 22.12.2021. Reply/instructions in the

meanwhile.

CMP No. 14205/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicant to file English translation of the annexures in

question within one week.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
1.12.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7574/2021

1.12.2021 Present: Ms. Kamlesh Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 2.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

1.12.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7567/2021

1.12.2021 Present: Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Rajneesh K. Lal, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for and is granted two days time to implead

the owner of the property as respondent.

List on 3.12.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
1.12.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7566/2021

1.12.2021 Present: Ms. Veena Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 2.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

1.12.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7501/2021

29.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents-
No.1 and 2.

Mr. Angrej Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Leaving all questions of law open, Admit. Tag

with CWPOA No.1494 of 2019.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.11.2021

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.4373/2019

29.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondent-State.

Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit
Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Surinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondents

No.4 and 5.

Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for
respondents No.6 to 15 (except respondent No.12).

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for respondents No.16

to 20.

Heard in part. List for continuation on 1.12.2021

when the relevant material relating to the amendment in the

Rules be produced for perusal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.5195/2020

29.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate for respondents
No.3 and 7.

Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.9.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No.10 and 11.

Reply on behalf of respondents No.10 and 11 is

stated to have been filed, however, the same is not on record.

Registry is directed to trace the same and place it on record.

Rejoinder to the reply(ies) be filed within two

weeks. List for consideration on 20.12.2021. Additional

documents/pleadings, if any, be also filed in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 63/2021

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

CMP(M) No.1086/2021

The present application has been filed seeking

condonation of delay. The appeal is within time in terms of

order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Therefore, the

application seeking condonation of delay in filing of the appeal

is clearly misconceived and is disposed of as such.

FAO (FC) No. 63/2021 & CMP No. 13968/2021

Issue notice to the respondent returnable for

4.12.2021, on taking steps within two days. Only on the

deposit of the decretal amount alongwith interest within a

period of four weeks, operation and execution of the impugned

judgment dated 9.3.2020 in Civil Suit No. 242/2013 passed by

the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hamirpur, H.P, is

ordered to be stayed.

Records of the case be also called for.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.1868/2020

27.11.2021 Present: Ms. Ekta, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Despite opportunity having been granted way back

on 17.3.2020 to file the rejoinder, the petitioner has failed to

file the same. As a matter of sheer indulgence and by way of

last opportunity, two weeks' further time is granted to file

rejoinder, failing which right to file the same shall be deemed to

be closed.

List on 13.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.6274 of 2021

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. B.N. Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for the respondents.

Leaving all question of law open, issue notice. Mr.

Balram Sharma, learned ASGI, appears and waives service of

notice on behalf of the respondents.

Admit. List after sixteen weeks.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7440 of 2021

.
27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondent-State.

CWP No.7440 of 2021 & CMP No. 13964/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

r to
transfer of the petitioner has been effected solely on the basis

of D.O Note bearing No.340908 dated 17.11.2021. In such

circumstances, issue notice. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned

Senior Additional Advocate General appears and waives service

of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Issue Dasti

notice for the service of respondent No.3 returnable for

6.12.2021.

In the meanwhile, impugned order of transfer

dated 24.11.2021 (Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner is ordered

to be stayed.

Copy Dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7446 of 2021

.

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate for the respondent.

Notice. Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He

prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file

reply/instructions.

r List on 13.12.2021.

Copy Dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7453 of 2021

27.11.2021 Present: M/s. Prashant Sharma and Ajit Sharma,

.

Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. Narinder Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Notice. Mr. Narinder Thakur, Advocate appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.

Heard. It is rather shocking that the appeal of the

petitioner, which was required to be dealt with by the Board of

Directors in accordance with the Rules, has been simply

rejected on the ground of limitation by General Manager of the

Bank.

On this, learned counsel for the respondent prays

for and is granted two days' time to seek instructions.

List on 30.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Cr.WP No.13 of 2021

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents No.2, 4 and 5-State.

SI Rajesh Kumar, I/O, P.S. Dehra

Today status report has been filed and the same is

ordered to be taken on record. Confronted with this, learned

counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks'

time to obtain further instructions in the matter.

Presence of SI Rajesh Kumar, Investigating Officer,

P.S. Dehra is dispensed with for the next date of hearing.

List on 18.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.8096 of 2019

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has died and he has filed the application for bringing

his LRs on record. However, the same is not on record.

Registry is directed to trace the same and place it on record.

List on 13.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1658 of 2020

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1 to 3-State.

Mr. Harish Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Respondent No.4 has been served but no one has

put in appearance on his behalf.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder.

List for consideration on 18.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.1841 of 2020

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Reply is yet to be filed. Let the same be filed

within four weeks

r to
List on 4.1.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1439 of 2019

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Chaman Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Atul

.

Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Surinder
Saklani, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Mr. Chaman Singh, Advocate appearing vice Mr.

Atul Jhingan, Advocate for the petitioner prays for an

adjournment. Prayer not opposed. Granted.

List on 13.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7079 of 2021

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Admit. List on 13.12.2021 alongwith CWP

No.2500 of 2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.7080 of 2021

27.11.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Admit. List on 13.12.2021 alongwith CWP

No.2500 of 2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.11.2021

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7393/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

CWP No. 7393/2021 & CMP No. 13817/2021

Notice confined to respondents No. 1 to 3.

Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr.

Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate, appear and waive service of
Mr.

notice on behalf of the respective respondents.

List on 27.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 47/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit

.

Jamwal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. K.D. Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,
Advocate, for the respondent.

Mr. Het Ram, Advocate has put in appearance on

behalf of the respondent. The instant case is a matrimonial

dispute, therefore, it is incumbent upon this Court to make an

endeavour for amicable settlement.

r Let both the parties

remain present before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 16.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 45/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit

.

Jamwal, Advocate, for the appellant.

Ms. Hema Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.

Ms. Hema Chauhan, Advocate has put in

appearance on behalf of the respondent by filing memo of

appearance. She prays for and is granted two weeks' time to

The
r to
file power of attorney on behalf of the respondent.

instant case is a matrimonial

therefore, it is incumbent upon this Court to make an
dispute,

endeavour for amicable settlement. Let both the parties

remain present before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 13.12.2021 alongwith FAO No.59 of 2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1625/2017

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani

Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the petitioners-State.

Mr. C.N.Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.

Court time is over. List on 16.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1599 of 2020 a/w CWP Nos. 1686
to 1688, 1695, 1696 and 1851 of 2020

.

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Peeyush

Verma, Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar and Mr. Devinder K.
Sharma, Advocates for the respective petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Court time is over. As prayed for, list on

16.12.2021. r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Cr.A No.141/2019

25.11.2021 Present: Ms. Lalita Verma, Advocate, for the appellant

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Court time is over. List after six weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Cr.A No.615/2019 a/w Cr.A No.589 of 2019

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the

.

appellant(s)

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Court time is over. List after six weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Cr.A No.383/2020 a/w Cr.A No.118 of 2020

Cr.A. No.383 of 2020

.

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Gautam Sood, Advocate, for the appellant

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani

Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Cr.A. No.118/2020

Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the
appellant(s)

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Court time is over. List after six weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.11.2021

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

RP No. 94/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Senior Advocate with Mr.

.

Karun Negi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

After hearing the parties, we are of the considered

party.

r to
view that Smt. Veena Devi, W/o Shri Jai Chand, R/o Village

Javi, P.O Darla, Tehsil Arki, District Solan, H.P is a necessary

Therefore, she is ordered to be impleaded as party

respondent, who shall figure as respondent No.6.

Issue Dasti notice for the service of newly added

respondent returnable for 9.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

FAO(FC) No.23/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Devender K Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

appellant.

Ms. Leena Guleria, Advocate, for the respondent.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge

25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.7002/2020

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2-State.

Admit. Tag alongwith CWPOA Nos. 6883, 6885,

6887 and 6891 2020.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.221/2021

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Surinder Saklani, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. R.K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Narender
Singh Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3.

9.12.2021.

List
r to
alongwith CWPOA No.4695 of 2019 on

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.11.2021

(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.6405/2020 a/w CWP No.2014 of 2021

CWPOA No.6405/2020

.

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1-State.

Mr. D.K. Khanna, Advocate for respondent No.2.

CWP No.2014 of 2021

Mr. C.S. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate for respondent No.3.

CMP-T No.759 of 2021 in CWPOA No.6405/2020

Since pleadings are not complete, therefore,

application for early hearing is dismissed.

CWPOA No.6405/2020 & CWP No.2014/2021

Respondents are directed to file reply(s) within two

weeks, failing which the erring respondents shall personally

appear before this Court alongwith the relevant records on the

next date of hearing.

List alongwith CWPOA No.2929 of 2020 on

9.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.6187/2020

25.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.5379/2020

25.11.2021 Present: Petitioner in person.

.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2-State.

It appears that the dues as admissible to the

petitioner are not being released simply for want of approval of

Board of Directors. The respondent-Board ought to be kind to

the petitioner, who is 76 years old.

Given the facts and circumstances of the case, we

direct the respondent-authorities to convene a meeting of the

Board of Directors either virtually or physically before

15.12.2021 and report compliance on the next date of hearing.

List on 16.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.3823/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Aman Parth, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

CMP No.13758 of 2021

Mr. Aman Parth, learned counsel for the petitioner

separate

has filed this application for furnishing the security. He states

that the co-sharers have simply submitted NOCs without

submitting

security bonds. Therefore, before

proceeding further to consider this application, let the security

bond be furnished within a period of one week.

CMP No.13760 of 2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 3823 of 2021

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record instructions dated 16.11.2021. The same are

ordered to be taken on record.

List on 1.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.6887/2020

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2-State.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, learned counsel for respondent

No.1 states that inadvertently reply could not be filed.

prays for and is granted one weeks' time to file reply.

Admit. Tag alongwith CWPOA Nos. 6883, 6885,
He

6891 and 7002 of 2020.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.6891/2020

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2-State.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, learned counsel for respondent

No.1 states that inadvertently reply could not be filed.

prays for and is granted one weeks' time to file reply.

Admit. Tag alongwith CWPOA Nos. 6883, 6885,
He

6887 and 7002 of 2020.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.7177/2020

24.11.2021 Present: Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, Admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No.8/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, Admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.6358/2020

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. J. L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.3.

Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent

No.4.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General states that he is under instruction not to file

any independent reply on behalf of the State and he adopts the

reply filed by respondent No.3. His statement is taken on

record.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned counsel for respondent

No.5 states that even though he had earlier filed reply but the

same is not on record. He prays for and is granted two weeks'

time to file fresh reply. Rejoinder already stands filed.

List on 1.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP Nos.404 and 405 of 2021

24.11.2021 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated

11.11.2021. Confronted with this, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to obtain

instructions from her client.

List on 8.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.3458/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr.Virender Katoch, Advocate, vice Mr. K.S.
Banyal, Senior Advocate, for respondents No.4 and

5.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General states that he is under instruction not to file

reply on behalf of the State. His statement is taken on record.

Rejoinder to the reply filed on behalf of

respondents No.4 and 5 be filed within three weeks.

List on 15.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.1011/2021 a/w CWP Nos.995 to
999, 1002 to 1008, 1010 and 1012 of 2021

.

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

M/s. Dalip K. Sharma, and Sushma Sharma,

Advocates¸ for respondent No.3.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General prays for and is granted one week's time to

obtain instructions as to whether the State is to file a separate

reply in CWP Nos.995 to 999 of 2021 and 1002 to 1008 of

2021 or would be adopting the reply filed in CWP Nos.1010,

1011 and 1012 of 2021.

List on 1.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.875/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Despite being put to formal notice as far back as

on 19.4.2021, the respondents have failed to file reply. As a

matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last opportunity,

three weeks' further time is granted to file reply, failing which

right to file the same shall be deemed to be closed and the

erring respondents shall personally appear before this Court

alongwith the relevant records on the next date of hearing.

List on 15.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.4093/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate
General. for respondents No.1 and 2-State.

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Motta, Advocate for respondent

No.3.

Mr. Jogesh Kumar Chandel, Advocate, for
respondent No.5.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 to

take specific instructions as and when Annexure AP-8 was

uploaded on its official webpage.

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No.3771/2021

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate prays for and is

granted two weeks further time to file reply. Rejoinder be filed

within four weeks thereafter.

List on 29.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 6362/2020

24.11.2021 Present: Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. V.B. Verma, CGC, for respondents No.1 to 4.

Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.6.

Respondent No.6 is yet to file reply. Learned

counsel appearing for 6th respondent submits that despite his

best efforts, he is not in a position to contact her.

r to
List for consideration on 1.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 6591/2020

24.11.2021 Present: M/s. Kishore Pundeer and Alvin Massey

.

Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur & Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State

Despite the respondents being put to formal notice

on 27.3.2019, reply, for over a period of more than two years,

has not been filed by them. Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Senior

Additional Advocate General prays for and is granted two

weeks' time to file reply, failing which their right to file reply

shall be deemed to have been closed and the erring

respondents shall personally appear before this Court

alongwith the relevant records on the next date of hearing.

List on 15.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.11.2021
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 2703/2021

18.11.2021 Present: None for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the respondent.
Mr. Vipin Pandit, Advocate, for the applicant in
CMP No. 11979/2021.

Despite repeated calls, none has put in appearance

on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, i.e.

11.11.2021, there was no appearance on behalf of the

petitioner. Therefore, this court is left with no other option,

but to dismiss the instant petition, so also the pending

application(s), if any, for want of appearance as also non-

prosecution. Ordered accordingly. All interim orders are

ordered to be vacated.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7073/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 25.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5896/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. O. P. Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the respondents.

Leaving all question of law open, notice. Mr.

Naresh Kaul, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted six

weeks' time to file reply.

List on 30.12.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5964/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents.

CMP No. 11528/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

removing the objections is ordered to be condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5964/2021

Leaving all question of law open, notice. Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He

prays for and is granted six weeks' time to file reply.

List on 30.12.2021.

CMP No. 11527/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file typed/legible copies of

Annexures P-1 to P-12 within a period of six weeks from today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5967/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents

No. 1 and 2.

CMP No. 11530/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

removing the objections is ordered to be condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5967/2021

Leaving all questions of law open, admit. List

along with CWP No. 5729/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5968/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vivekanand Negi, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent
No.3.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5982/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5986/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Pawnish Shukla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 5986/2021

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

CMP No.11565/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file translated copy of Annexure P-3

within a period of six weeks from today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5989/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Ms. Soma Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 6034/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

As prayed for, list before the learned Principal

Bench on 23.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 6035/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

As prayed for, list before the learned Principal

Bench on 23.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPIL No. 6/2017

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Deven Khanna, Advocate, as Amicus Curiae.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents No. 1 to 16/State.
Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for respondent
No.17-HPTDC.

Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.18-M.C. Shimla.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent No.19-
UOI.

Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.20-NHAI.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list before the learned Principal Bench on 22.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPIL No. 108/2017

a/w CWP No. 2077/2017

.

CWPIL No. 108/2017

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents No. 1 to 7/State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI for respondents No. 8

and 13.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.9.

Mr. K. D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Het Ram
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.10.
Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No. 11 and 12.

CWP No. 2077/2017

Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, vice Ms. Shalini

Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents No. 1 to 7/State.
Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI for respondent-Union of
India.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, the applicant
in CMP No. 8159/2017.

Mr. Devinder K. Sharma, Advocate, for the
applicant in CMP No. 4246/2019.
Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for the applicant in
CMP No. 10440/2017 and CMP No. 10666/2021.

Mr. Sanjay Verma, Advocate, prays for and is

granted an adjournment on the ground that the original

counsel is not available today.

List before the learned Principal Bench on

22.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 130/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Ms. Babita, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General has

filed the compliance affidavit, which clearly discloses that the

case of the petitioner has been considered and thereafter

rejected vide order dated 15.6.2015.

The petition already stands disposed of. Therefore,

the only direction, which can be passed at this stage, is

reserving liberty to the petitioner to assail the consideration

order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. The matter

is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Cr. A. No. 405/2019

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant.

The application filed by the appellant-State is lying

under objections. Learned Deputy Advocate General

undertakes to remove the same within one week.

List on 2.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPs No. 89, 90, 221, 222, 223, 271, 283, 826 and 932/2020

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Mr. Mukul Sood, Mr. Vinod

.

Chauhan and Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan,

Advocates, for the respective petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted two weeks' time to file the compliance report,

failing which erring respondents shall personally appear before

this Court along with relevant records on the next date of

hearing.

List on 2.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 31/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the
respondent.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 9.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

18.11.2021
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

LPA No. 49/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the

.
appellant.

Mr. B. N. Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Steps for service of respondents No. 2 and 8 to 12

not taken. The same, as prayed for, be taken within one week.

Thereafter, issue notice to the aforesaid respondents

returnable for 16.12.2021, when the matter will be listed before

the Registrar concerned.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. P. No 133/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. N. D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

The order in question stands complied with

inasmuch as the respondents have passed the consideration

order. Therefore, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the

consideration order, he is at liberty to assail the same in

accordance with law. The matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 206/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A. K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil God, Advocate, for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and

is granted four days' time to comply with the order in question.

List on 23.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 208/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay K. Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that

the order in question stands complied with inasmuch as entire

retiral benefits have been paid to the petitioner. His statement

is taken on record.

In view of above, no further order is required to be

passed and the matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 221/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that

the order in question could not be complied with as there are

departmental proceedings as also a criminal case pending

against the petitioner.

Confronted with this, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to ascertain

this position.

List on 3.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 343/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State

CMP No. /2021

The respondents-State have filed an application for

extension of time. However, the same is not on record. A copy

of the application has been made available to us.

Be registered. Having gone through the contents

of the application, we find the action of the respondents-State

to be fully justified in seeking six weeks' time to comply with

the order in question. Ordered accordingly. Application stands

disposed of.

Ex. Pet. No. 343/2021

For compliance, list on 30.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 345/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State

The order in question stands complied with

inasmuch as the respondents have passed the consideration

order. Therefore, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the

consideration order, he is at liberty to assail the same in

accordance with law. The matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 368/2021

18.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Anil God, Advocate, for the respondents No. 1
and 2.

The order in question stands complied with

inasmuch as the respondents have passed the consideration

order. Therefore, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the

consideration order, he is at liberty to assail the same in

accordance with law. The matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

LPA No. 458/2012

.

17.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Jiwan, Advocate, vice counsel for respondent
No.2.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 24.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
17.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 2696/2021

17.11.2021 Present: Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Mr.

.

Saurabh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. V. D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the respondent.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 24.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

17.11.2021
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 2695/2021

17.11.2021 Present: Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Senior Advocate with Mr.

.

Saurabh Ahluwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. V. D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the respondent.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 24.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

17.11.2021
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5839/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Ms. Ekta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Sharma,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State

Leaving all questions of law open, admit. Tag

along with CWP No. 5837/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5841/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Ms. Ekta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Sharma,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State

Leaving all questions of law open, admit. Tag

along with CWP No. 5837/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5840/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Ms. Ekta, Advocate, vice Mr. Vinay Sharma,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State

Leaving all questions of law open, admit. Tag

along with CWP No. 5837/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5848/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vijay K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay K. Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit. Tag

along with CWPOA No. 1494/2019.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5843/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

16.11.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5844/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

16.11.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5897/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

16.11.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5904/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 5907/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7110/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the petitioners.

CWP No. 7110/2021

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable for

28.12.2021, on taking steps within one week.

CMP No. 13357/2021

Heard. Subject to the petitioners' depositing the

award amount within a period of six weeks from today,

operation and execution of the impugned order dated

28.6.2021 (Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7126/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents

CWP No. 7126/2021 & CMP No. 13369/2021

Notice. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted four

weeks' time to file reply. List on 14.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7134/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents No.1 to 3.

CWP No. 7134/2021 & CMP No. 13384/2021

Notice. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Issue notice to respondent

No.4 under order 5
Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for 30.11.2021.

In the meanwhile, operation and execution of the impugned

order dated 9.11.2021 (Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 7138/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

CWP No. 7138/2021 & CMP No. 13390/2021

Notice. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three

weeks' time to file reply. List on 14.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 3193/2019 & CWP No. 3601/2021

16.11.2021 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner

.

in CWP No. 3193/2019.

Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No. 3601/2021.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

CWP No. 3193/2019 & CWP No. 3601/2021

r to
Admit. List for hearing on 30.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 3832/2019 a/w CWP No. 5199/2020

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
petitioner in CWP No. 3832/2019 and for the
respondents-State in CWP No. 5199/2020.

Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the respondent
in CWP No. 3832/2019 and for the petitioner in
CWP No. 5199/2020.

r to
Heard further. For continuity, list on 18.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 1100/2020

16.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent-NHAI.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondent-State.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 23.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 2050/2020

16.11.2021 Present: Ms. Rita Hingmang, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Admit. List for hearing on 30.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 491/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Mr. Arun Sehgal, Advocate, for respondents No. 2
and 3.

Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mani
Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants in CMPs No.

3470 & 4264/2021.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 17.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 992/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Ashwani
Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that

the seniority of the petitioner has been corrected and the only

issue now remains for adjudication is regarding promotion of

the petitioner to the post of Head Master, that too, from the

date when his juniors were promoted.

Since promotions are to be carried out by the

Director Higher Education, therefore, he is ordered to be

impleaded as party respondent, who shall figure as respondent

No.3.

Issue notice to newly added respondent. Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.3. He

prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 13.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 2385/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. H. S. Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate, for respondents
No. 4 to 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18 to 23.
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate, vice Mr. Deepak
Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No. 11, 17, 24

and 25.

Ms. Shikha Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No. 14.

Ms. Seema K. Guleria, Advocate, for respondent

No.26.

The respondents, who are yet to file reply, pray for

and are granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 6.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 2796/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajit
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.3 is stated to

have been filed. Registry to trace and place the same on record.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.4, as prayed for,

be filed within three weeks.

List on 6.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 3752/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Ms. Babita, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Rejoinder, as prayed for, be filed within two weeks.

List on 29.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4270/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gurinder

.

Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

List on 17.11.2021. Registry to reflect name of Mr.

Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, in the cause list henceforth.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4273/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted two days' time to comply with the order,

failing which respondent No.2 shall personally remain present

before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 17.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4304/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Admit. Rejoinder within six weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4306/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Shandil, Advocate, vice Mr. Abhishek

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Yogesh K. Chandel, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents
No. 3 and 4.

Mr. Yogesh K. Chandel, Advocate, has put in

appearance on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. He prays for

and is granted two weeks' time to file reply and power of

attorney.

List on 6.12.2021. Registry to reflect name of Mr.

Yogesh K. Chandel, Advocate, in the cause list, henceforth.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
15.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4508/2021 a/w CWP Nos. 4518, 4958, 4964 and 5026/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner(s) in all the writ petitions, except CWP

No. 4518/2021.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No. 4518/2021.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the

respondents-State.

Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent-Medical college.
Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent-University.

Since counselling in these cases has been fixed on

19.11.2021, therefore, list for consideration on 17.11.2021.

Additional documents/pleadings in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
15.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:37 :::CIS

CWP No. 4893/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Manik Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. R. L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sanjeevani
Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

r to
Reply on behalf of respondent No.3 stands filed in

the open Court, which is made part of the court file.

Rejoinder, as prayed for, be filed within one week.

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5051/2021

15.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Surinder Verma, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Rejoinder not filed. The same be positively filed

within four weeks.

List on 13.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
15.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CMP No. 10593/2021 in CWP No. 1962/2015

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the
applicants/respondents.

Fresh status report, in terms of previous order,

stands filed in the open Court.

List on 18.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4981/2020

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 2.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 113/2019

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. J. S. Bagga, Advocate, for respondents No. 3
and 4.

Since an amount of Rs. 15,36,039/- stands

4, therefore,
r to
deposited in the registry of this Court by respondents No. 3

and order dated 29.9.2021

attachment of the properties of respondents No. 3 and 4, is
directing the

ordered to be recalled.

Let the aforesaid amount be released in favour of

the petitioner(s) as per their shares calculated and given by

respondent No.3 along with draft, attached in B-part of the file,

by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts to be

furnished by the petitioners within one week from today.

List on 9.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5230/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1

to 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file supplementary affidavit.

r to
List on 9.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5504/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 2
to 4.

Learned Additional Advocate General states that

complete set of documents, handed over by the petitioner, has

been sent to respondent No.1.

Confronted with this, learned Assistant Solicitor

General of India prays for and is granted four weeks' time to

file reply. However, it is made clear that no further opportunity

shall be granted for filing the reply.

List on 15.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5728/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. M.A. Khan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh K.

.

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.

CMP No. 11162/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

removing the objections is ordered to be condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5728/2021

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5729/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

CMP No. 11165/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

removing the objections is ordered to be condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5729/2021

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

CMP No. 11164/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file typed/legible copies of

Annexures in question within a period of four weeks from

today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5736/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

CMP No. 11181/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

re-filing the main petition is ordered to be condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5736/2021

The petitioner has assailed the award that was

passed three years back on 10.10.2018. There is no

explanation as to why the award was not challenged well before

the time. Let supplementary affidavit, clearly explaining

therein the delay, be filed within four weeks. List on

15.12.2021.

CMP No. 11180/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file typed/legible copies of

documents in question within a period of four weeks from

today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5737/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

and 2.

CMP No. 11179/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, delay in

removing the objections is ordered to be condoned.

application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 5737/2021

The

Leaving all questions of law open, notice. Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 and

2. Issue notice to respondents No. 3 to 5, returnable for

15.12.2021, on taking steps within three days.

CMP No. 11173/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file typed/legible copies of

Annexures in question within a period of four weeks from

today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5744/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5745/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

and 2.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5746/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

CWP No. 5746/2021

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

CMP No. 11187/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file typed/legible copies of

Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3 within a period of four weeks from

today.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5747/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

11.11.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5756/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5983/2021

11.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ramesh Kaundal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, issue notice.

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondents. List along with CWP No. 6646/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 7661/2019

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Respondent No.2 is yet to file reply. The same be

positively filed within two weeks, failing which right to file the

same shall be deemed to be closed.

List on 24.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr. A. No. 135/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal

Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant.
Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate, vice counsel for the
respondents.

Learned vice counsel for the respondents prays for

and is granted an adjournment on the ground that the original

counsel is indisposed.

List on 17.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 378/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal

Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 3
and 4.

Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, states that her

presence is wrongly being marked for respondent No.2 and she

is representing only respondent No.1. Her statement is taken

on record.

Issue notice to respondent No.2, returnable for

8.12.2021, on taking steps during the course of the day.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
10.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1053/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal

Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the petitioners-
State.

Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and

is granted four weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

r to
List on 15.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1978/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted one week's further time to file rejoinder.

List on 17.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2159/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record copy of minutes of meeting held on 18.10.2021

under the chairmanship of the Deputy Commissioner, Una.

We notice that the time has been granted to the

SDM(s) concerned to fix freight rates on consensual basis

between the Industry Associations and Truck Unions by

5.11.2021. However, further action that was required to be

taken in the matter is not forthcoming.

On the request of learned Additional Advocate

General, list on 24.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 2620/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on

record instructions dated 8.11.2021.

Admit. List for hearing before the learned Single

Judge having roster.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3115/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 to 25.
Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for
respondents No. 26 to 29.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 17.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3357/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay

.

Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.
Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for
respondents No. 2 to 4.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
10.11.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3633/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. N.S. Chandel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vinod K.
Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

On the request of learned counsel for respondent

No.4, list on 17.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
10.11.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 4314/2020

10.11.2021 Present: Mr. C. N. Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for the respondent.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 17.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

10.11.2021
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 3980/2019 a/w CWPOA No.
3145/2019, CWP No. 1367, 2420, 3198, 4820,
136, 3938, 4618, 4806, 5459, 5974, 6005,

.

6031, 7450, 7457, 7532, 7537/2020,

1330,1351, 1456, 2276, 2245, 3403, 3599,
3687, 3812, 4238, 4289, 4506, 4642, 4745,

4897, 5063 and 6487/2021

30.10.2021 Present: M/s Subhash Sharma, S.P. Chatterji, A.K. Gupta,
H.S. Rangra, Ramakant Sharma, M.L. Sharma,
Peeyush Verma, Vishwa Bhushan, P.P. Chauhan,
Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Rajneesh K. Lal, Y.P.S.
Dhaulta, B.C. Verma, Surinder Parkash Sharma

and Karan Singh Parmar, Advocates, for the
respective petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for the respondent-
UOI.

M/s. Tim Saran, Karun Negi, Yashwant Singh,
S.V. Bhardwaj, Vikrant Thakur, Lakshay Thakur
and Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocates, for the

respective respondents.

CWPOA No. 3980/2020

De-linked. List on 27.11.2021.

CWP No. 3599/2021

De-linked. Admit. List after four weeks.

CWP No. 6487/2021 & CMP No.12305/2021

De-linked. List on 27.11.2021. In the meanwhile,

the official respondents are restrained from effecting any

recovery/deduction from the salary of the petitioner.

CWPOA No. 3145/2019, CWP No. 1367, 2420,
3198, 4820, 136, 3938, 4618, 4806, 5459,
5974, 6005, 6031, 7450, 7457, 7532,
7537/2020, 1330, 1351, 1456, 2276, 2245,
3403, 3687, 3812, 4238, 4289, 4506, 4642,
4745, 4897 & 5063/2021

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

.

parties, list on 27.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj) r

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 3486/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh K.

.

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

List along with Rogi Kalyan Samiiti's cases on the

date already fixed.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 5380/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. N. D. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 1001/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Shivam, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Vashishta,
Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 3729/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

30.10.2021
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr.A. No. 324/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Ms. Salochana Rana, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Janak Raj, Advocate, vice Mr. Sandeep
Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.

Cr.MP No. 2122/2021

Notice. Mr. Janak Raj, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays

for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List for consideration on 12.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2483/2019

30.10.2021 Present: Ms. Dimple, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Admit. Rejoinder, if any, within four weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2488/2019

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1592/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Shivam, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Vashishta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1654/2020 a/w CWP No. 1668/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Devi

.

Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP No.

1654/2020 and Ms. Kamlesh, Advocate, vice
counsel for the petitioner in CWP No. 1668/2020.
Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent-Medical
Council of India.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G., for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Assistant Solicitor

General of India, on instructions, states that he will not be

appearing on behalf of respondent-Medical Council of India.

His statement is taken on record.

Since one of the issues is sub judice before the

Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, list these matters after six

weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2279/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Rajender Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, CGC, for the respondents.

Reply is stated to have been filed in the registry

today. Registry to trace and place the same on record, even if it

is under objections.

List along with CWP Nos. 2496/2019 &

2563/2019. r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2495/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted two weeks' time to obtain instructions.

List on 27.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2825/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit

.

Jamwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 4
and 5.

The matter is part-heard before another bench as

is evident from order dated 6.9.2021. Therefore, list the case

before the same bench on 12.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.2909/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Ms. Babita, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

On the request of learned vice counsel for the

petitioner, list on 12.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3373/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Saurabh, Advocate, vice Mr. Subhash Sharma,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

CMP No. 2/2021

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and the

Director, Elementary Education, Shimla, is ordered to be

arrayed as party. Application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 3373/2020

Amended memo of parties is ordered to be taken

on record. Issue notice to newly added respondent No.4. Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent

No.4. He prays for and is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 12.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3377/2020

30.10.2021 Present: None for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

List before a bench of which one of us (Justice

Jyotsna Rewal Dua) is not a member.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3472/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Rejoinder, as prayed for, be filed within three

weeks. List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3874/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

List on 12.11.2021, when registry shall reflect the

name of Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, in the cause list on

r to
behalf of respondent No.3. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3875/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Devi Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Admit. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3880/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Virender Bali, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Ms. Komal Chaudhary, Advocate, vice Ms. Ritta
Goswami, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. V.B.
Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

issue in question is squarely covered by Three-Judge Bench of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
Jigya Yadav vs. CBSE
, 2021

(7) SCC 535.

Since the original counsel for respondent No.1 is

not available today, therefore, the case is ordered to be listed

on 12.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4073/2021

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file rejoinder(s).

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4078/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajeet Pal

.

Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

CMP No. 13318/2020

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and

name of respondent No.6, Harish Gupta, is ordered to be

deleted from the array of respondents, subject to all just

exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 4078/2020

Amended memo of parties and rejoinder, if any, be

filed within four weeks.

List on 4.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4278/2020

30.10.2021 Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Ms. Reeta Thakur, Advocate, for respondents
No.1, 3 and 4.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
30.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4311/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

List along with CWP No. 4165/2021 on the date

already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.4165/2021 a/w CWP Nos. 4166 to
4179, 4219, 4305/2021

.

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 26.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2697/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Stand of the respondents-State, as reflected in

para 8 of the reply, cannot be countenanced.

Faced with this, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General prays for and is granted two weeks' time to

obtain instructions. List on 3.12.2021. Interim order to

continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2048/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Praneet Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Mr. V. B. Verma, CGC, for respondent No.5.
Mr. Surinder Paul Jagota, SE PWD in person.

CMP No. /2021

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General states

that he has filed an application for extension of time. However,

the same is not on record. A copy of the application has been

made available to the Court.

Be registered. After going through the application,

we are inclined to grant four weeks' further time to the

respondents-State to comply with the previous order. Ordered

accordingly.

Personal presence of the Superintending Engineer,

PWD, is dispensed with; provided the order in question is

complied with or else, he is still required to be present in the

Court. Application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 2048/2021

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4030/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he

has filed an application for impleadment of parties. However,

the same is not on record. Registry to trace and place the same

on record, even if it is under objections.

List on 30.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4327/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, vice Mr. Susheel

.

Gautam, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

Learned vice counsel for the petitioner prays for

and is granted an adjournment on the ground that the original

counsel is out of station.

r to
List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4623/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 is stated

to have been filed. Registry to trace and place the same on

record, even if it is under objections. Notice issued to

respondent No.4 has been received back unserved with the

report that he is residing in Karnataka. Therefore, let fresh

steps for the service of aforesaid respondent be taken within

two weeks. In the event of steps being taken, issue notice to

respondent No.4 returnable for 10.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4991/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Ms.
Shradha Karol, Advocate, for the respondents No.
3 to 10.

Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 is

stated to have been filed. Registry to trace and place the same

on record, even if it is under objections.

Ms. Shradha Karol, Advocate, states that reply on

behalf of respondents No. 3 to 10 is being filed during the

course of the day. Her statement is taken on record.

Rejoinder(s) to all the replies be filed within three

weeks.

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5037/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Balram Sharma, CGC, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-

State.

Reply, as prayed for, be positively filed within two

weeks, failing which not only right to file the same shall be

deemed to be closed, but the Court shall also proceed to

consider the case on its own merits.

List on 12.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5095/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted four weeks' time to file rejoinder.

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5192/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2 is

stated to have been filed on 27.10.2021. Registry to trace and

place the same on record. Rejoinder, as prayed for, be filed

within four weeks.

List on 26.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5195/2021

29.10.2021 Present: Mr. Varun Panwar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted two weeks' further time to file reply.

List on 12.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

29.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3094/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Gagan Kumar & Mr. Dalip K. Sharma,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwan
Singh Negi, Advocate, for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to ascertain status of the appeal, if

any, as reflected in Annexure A-5 at page 142 of the paper-

book.

List on 16.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3120/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondents-
State.

List before regular DB on 11.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4209/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for

respondent No.2.

Admit. List after four weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4412/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.9.

Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate, for respondent No.12.

On the request of learned counsel for the

r to
petitioner, list on 11.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
28.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4508/2021 a/w CWP Nos. 4518,

4958, 4964 and 5026/2021

.

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the

petitioner(s) in all the writ petitions, except CWP
No. 4518/2021.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner
in CWP No. 4518/2021.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondent- medical college.
Ms. Shailja, Advocate, vice Mr. Neel Kamal

Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent-University.

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) pray for and

are granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder(s).

List on 15.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4763/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent

No.4.

Despite repeated opportunities, neither

instructions nor reply have been filed on behalf of the

respondents.

Needful be done on or before the next date of

hearing. List on 30.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP Nos. 4842/2021 & 4300/2021

CWP No. 4842/2021

.

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

CWP No. 4300/2021

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply in CWP No. 4842/2021.

Registry is directed to reflect name of Mr. P.P. Chauhan,

Advocate, in the case list, henceforth in CWP No. 4842/2021.

List on 25.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4848/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. V. D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Dheeraj K. Verma, Advocate, for proposed

respondent No.4.

List before regular DB on 11.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4857/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.

Award amount stands deposited in the registry of

this Court. The same be invested as per procedure.

Admit. List on 23.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4866/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Devinder Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for

.
the petitioner.

Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Admit. List on 23.12.2021. Pleadings be

completed in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

28.10.2021
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4893/2021

28.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Manik Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. Arjun K. Lal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

List before regular DB on 11.11.2021. Registry is

directed to reflect name of Mr. Arjun K. Lal, Advocate, in the

cause list henceforth.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

28.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4860/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathor & Mr. Ajit Sharma,

.

Advocates, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for respondents No.
1 to 4.

Mr. K.D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for respondent No.7.

Learned counsel for respondent No.5 has

placed on record communication dated 22.10.2021,

which reads as under:-

Kindly refer to the Deputy Commissioner, Mandi, letter
No. MND-SD-DRA-/2021-31003-05 dated 21.10.2021 on
the subject cited above.

2. In this regard, the work of constructing four lane
road is being executed by the NHAI through different
agencies and the work of constructing a road has been

awarded to concessionaire i.e. M/s SP Pandoh Takoli

Highways Pvt. Ltd. on Hybrid Annuity Mode (HAM) and
presently construction work is under progress.

3. It is intimated that various complaints regarding

landslides are being received from the Distt.
Administration as well as locals. Further, a
resolution/proposal dated 5.6.2021 has been received
from the o/o Gram Panchayat Aut, Block Development-
Balichowki, Distt. Mandi (HP) for shifting of road
towards valley side. The proposal was scrutinized by
the independent engineer of the project & further this
office has taken up the matter with the competent
authority for the acquisition of additional land towards
valley side so that further damages to the adjoining
land owners of village Thalout towards hill side can be
minimized.

4. Thereafter, NHAI, HQ vide letter No.
NHAI/HAM/NHDP-IV/11019/PB-Tk/Pkg-
II/2015/dated 8.10.2021 has directed the following:-

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

"in principle agreed to. However, express consent of

.

DM/DC should be obtained before proceeding further."

5. In view of above, it is requested to kindly give the
concurrence for the same so that additional land
towards valley side may be acquired to avoid further

damages in village Thalout and work can be completed
in time bound manner.

2 Taking into consideration the urgency involved

in the matter, we direct the respondent No.2-Deputy

Commissioner, Mandi, to give concurrence, as sought

for in the aforesaid communication, as expeditiously as

possible and in no event later than 2.11.2021, when

copy of such concurrence be placed on record.

List on 2.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6664/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Ms. Seema Azad, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two days' time to amend memo of parties.

List on 10.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

27.10.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6666/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Caveat petition No. 273/2021

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6666/2021 & CMP No. 12588/2021

Notice is confined to respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr.

Anuj Gupta, Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on

behalf of the respective respondents.

List along with CWP No. 6460/2021 on the date

already fixed.

CMP No. 12589/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicant/petitioner to file English Translation of

documents in question within a period of four weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6665/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Caveat petition No. 276/2021

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6665/2021 & CMP No. 12586/2021

Notice is confined to respondents No. 1 and 3. Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr.

Anuj Gupta, Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on

behalf of the respective respondents.

List along with CWP No. 6460/2021 on the date

already fixed.

CMP No. 12587/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicant/petitioner to file English Translation of

documents in question within a period of four weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6677/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jyotirmay

.

Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondents No.1
and 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents No. 2 and 3.

CWP No. 6677/2021 & CMP No. 12598/2021

Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Assistant

Solicitor General of India and Mr. Ashwani Sharma, learned

Additional Advocate General appear and waive service of notice

on behalf of the respective respondents. They pray for and are

granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 24.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6678/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

CWP No. 6678/2021 & CMP No. 12599/2021

Notice. Mr. Ashwani Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. Reply/instructions within two days.

List on 29.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6681/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for

the petitioner prays for and is granted an adjournment.

List on 29.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

27.10.2021
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6698/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondent-State.

CWP No. 6698/2021 & CMP No. 12616/2021

Notice. Mr. Ashwani Sharma, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

The only ground, on which the present petition has

been filed, is of discrimination. It is contended that one Jagbir

Singh Chandel, Lecturer (School new) Hindi has been granted

study leave as is evident from Annexure P-5 and in the case of

the petitioner, the same has been rejected vide order dated

5.7.2021.

Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted two days' time to obtain

instructions.

List on 29.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
27.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5383/2021

27.10.2021 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for
respondents No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

List on 28.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

27.10.2021
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3941/2021 a/w CWP

Nos. 3942 to 3955, 4835 and

4836/2021

.

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. S. P. Chatterji, Advocate, for the petitioner(s),
in all the petitions, except CWP Nos. 4835/2021 &
4836/2021.

Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate, for the

petitioner(s) in CWP Nos. 4835/2021 &

4836/2021

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Amitabh Awasthy, Secretary (Health) in

person.

Mr. Amitabh Awasthy, Secretary (Health), has

explained the circumstances, under which the order(s) passed

by this Court could not be complied with. He further states

that the order(s) in question shall positively be complied with

within a period of four weeks. His statement is taken on record.

List on 30.11.2021. Personal presence of the

aforesaid officer is dispensed with.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 22/2020

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.

appellant.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit
Jamwal, Advocate, for the respondent.

Both the parties are not present. Their presence

be ensured on the next date of hearing.

List on 16.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr. Appeal No.617/2015

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.

Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
appellant-State.

Mr. R. K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Megha
Kapur Gautam, Advocate, for respondents No.

1 to 6.

Respondent No.5 is present in person and

identified as such by his counsel. Let respondent No.5 furnish

bail bonds, in terms of order dated 19.12.2015, to the

satisfaction of any of the Registrars of this Court, during the

course of the day.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
26.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6498/2021

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun

.

Verma, Mr. Tejasvi Dogra and Mr. Harsh Kalta,

Advocates, for the petitioner.

CWP No. 6498/2021 & CMP No. 12319/2021

Issue notice to the respondents returnable for

30.11.2021, on taking steps within two days. In the

meanwhile, operation and execution of the impugned order

dated 6.4.2021 (Annexure P-18) is ordered to be stayed.

CMP No. 12320/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the petitioner/applicant to file English translation of

document(s) in question within a period of four weeks.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1825/2019

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General states

that requisition for release of the grant-in-aid has been

received from the respondent-Corporation and the same, after

consideration, shall be released to the petitioner, within three

weeks. His statement is taken on record.

List on 16.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 7/2020

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. B. N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent-
Accountant General.

Learned Central Government Counsel states that

claim of the petitioner is under consideration. He prays for

and is granted two weeks' further time to do the needful.

List on 9.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 9/2020

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. B. N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent-
Accountant General.

Learned Central Government Counsel states that

claim of the petitioner is under consideration. He prays for

and is granted two weeks' further time to do the needful.

List on 9.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 8/2020

26.10.2021 Present: Mr. B. N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.
Ashwani Sharma, Addl. A.Gs., Dy.A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent-
Accountant General.

Learned Central Government Counsel states that

claim of the petitioner is under consideration. He prays for

and is granted two weeks' further time to do the needful.

List on 9.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
26.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5981/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G. and Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.
A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,

Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 26.10.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6027/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.1.-State.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Issue notice to respondent No.3 returnable for

22.11.2021, on taking steps within two days.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6028/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.1.-State.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Issue notice to respondent No.3 returnable for

22.11.2021, on taking steps within two days.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6029/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondent
No.1.-State.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Issue notice to respondent No.3 returnable for

22.11.2021, on taking steps within two days.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6037/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atharv

.

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 8.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6281/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G. and Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.
A.G. for the respondents-State.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 25.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge

25.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6384/2021

25.10.2021 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Adocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G. and Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.
A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent

No.3.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 27.10.2021,

when a responsible officer of the respondents-State shall

r to
remain present to assist the Court.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2348/2019

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Tomar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for
respondent No.3.

Since respondent No.3 has passed the

consideration order, therefore, the order in question stands

complied with and the proceedings are closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6396/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 12.11.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6395/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 12.11.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6394/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok K. Tyagi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 12.11.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6491/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Ms. Suman Thakur & Mr. Anuj Thakur, Advocates,

.

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Status report by way of an affidavit filed in the

open court on behalf of the respondent is ordered to be taken

on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted one week's time to file counter affidavit.

List on 29.10.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1772/2020

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajinder Sharma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

As prayed for, list on 3.12.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 141/2019

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the

.
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Sr. Additional

Advocate General states that the bill(s) in question would be

prepared and sent to the Treasury during the course of the

day. His statement is taken on record.

For compliance, to come up on 25.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6575/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Caveat petition No. 274/2021

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6575/2021 & CMP No. 12437/2021

List along with CWP No. 6460/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6574/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Caveat petition No. 269/2021

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6574/2021 & CMP No. 12435/2021

List along with CWP No. 6460/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6565/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun

.

Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Caveat petition No. 275/2021

Caveat is discharged. Petition stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6565/2021 & CMP No. 12417/2021

List along with CWP No. 6460/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6542/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul

.

Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 6542/2021 & CMP No. 12376/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Sr. Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

weeks' time to file reply.

r to He prays for and is granted four

List on 25.11.2021. In the meanwhile, operation

and execution of the order dated 4.8.2021 (Annexure P-4) and

re-assessment order dated 25.6.2015 (Annexure P-2) are

ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6543/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul

.

Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 6543/2021 & CMP No. 12377/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Sr. Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

weeks' time to file reply.

r to He prays for and is granted four

List on 25.11.2021. In the meanwhile, operation

and execution of the order dated 4.8.2021 (Annexure P-4) and

re-assessment order dated 25.6.2015 (Annexure P-2) are

ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6539/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul

.

Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 6539/2021 & CMP No. 12373/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Sr. Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

weeks' time to file reply.

r to He prays for and is granted four

List on 25.11.2021. In the meanwhile, operation

and execution of the order dated 4.8.2021 (Annexure P-4) and

re-assessment order dated 25.6.2015 (Annexure P-2) are

ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6540/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul

.

Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 6540/2021 & CMP No. 12374/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Sr. Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

weeks' time to file reply.

r to He prays for and is granted four

List on 25.11.2021. In the meanwhile, operation

and execution of the order dated 4.8.2021 (Annexure P-4) and

re-assessment order dated 25.6.2015 (Annexure P-2) are

ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6573/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.

CWP No. 6573/2021 & CMP No. 12433/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

Reply/instructions before the next date of hearing. List on

30.10.2021. r In the meanwhile, the impugned office orders

dated 14.9.2021 and 29.9.2021, Annexures P-3 and P-4

respectively, are ordered to be stayed.

CMP No. 12434/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicant/petitioner to file complete typed copy of

Annexure P-2 within a period of one week.

Copy dasti

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6561/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

CWP No. 6561/2021

Admit.

CMP No. 12416/2021

The application is dismissed as misconceived.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6488/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate, CGC, for the
respondents.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for

the petitioner prays for and is granted an adjournment.

List on 25.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
22.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 128/2021

22.10.2021 Present: Mr. Harish Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted one week's time to comply with order dated 7.10.2021.

r to
List on 29.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
22.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1073/2021

21.10.2021 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder.

List on 11.11.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
21.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5654/2020

21.10.2021 Present: Mr. Arsh Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Surinder Verma, Advocate, for respondents No.

1 to 3.

Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for respondents
No. 4 & 5.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 28.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
r Judge

21.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 4003/2020

21.10.2021 Present: Mr. R. L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

List on 22.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

21.10.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2947/2020 & CWP No.3400/2020

21.10.2021 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

CMP Nos. 12293/2021 & 12296/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted three

weeks' time to file reply. List on 18.11.2021.

CMP Nos. 12994/2021 & 12997/2021

The applications are disposed of with a direction to

the applicant(s) to file the translated/typed copies of

Annexures in question within a period of three weeks.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)
Judge
21.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3560/2020

21.10.2021 Present: Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for

.

the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. Anil God, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

List along with CWP No. 6469/2021 on the date

already fixed.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Jyotsna Rewal Dua)

Judge
21.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5124/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.9.

Respondents No.1, 2, 4, 6 and 9 are stated to have

filed replies. Registry to trace and place the same on record. As

weeks.

r to
regard remaining respondents, reply, if any, be filed within four

List on 16.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.10.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5158/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Ms. Rajvinder Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

The respondents are stated to have filed replies on

7.10.2021 & 18.10.2021 respectively. Registry is directed to

trace and place the same on record even if it is under

objections.

List on 8.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5180/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent

No.1.

Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

states that the entire premises in question have been

demolished, except the wall, abutting the property of Railway

Authorities, which shall also be removed by 20.10.2021. His

statement is taken on record.

Let formal report to this effect be filed by

respondent No.2 on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 26.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5281/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.
Mr. Dalip Singh Kaith, Advocate, for respondent

No.4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.4 prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

r to
List on 9.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5417/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. G. C. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera

.

Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

It is rather shocking that the respondent-State is

not in a position to apprise this Court regarding scale of

measurement despite the Court having taken cognizance of

this petition since 16.9.2021.

As a matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last

opportunity, two weeks' time is granted to the respondent-

State to apprise this Court regarding scale of measurement to

be applied in the instant case, failing which the respondent

shall remain present before this court on the next date of

hearing.

List on 2.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5942/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Jhamba & Mr. Ashish Jhamba

.

Advocates, for the petitioners.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Advocate, for respondents
No. 2 and 3.

Despite opportunity, the respondents have failed to

file the reply. As prayed for, needful be done within two weeks,

failing which erring respondent(s) shall personally appear

before this Court along with relevant records on the next date

of hearing.

List on 2.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6298/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

CMP No. 12285/2021

The application is allowed as prayed for and name

of respondent No.3, Deputy Director Elementary Education,

Mandi, District Mandi is ordered to be substituted by the

Deputy Director Higher Education, Mandi. The application

stands disposed of.

CWP No. 6298/2021

Issue notice to the newly substituted respondent

No.3. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent

No.3. Issue dasti notice for the service of respondent No.4,

returnable for 2.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6384/2021

19.10.2021 Present: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent
No.3.

Let the respondents-State produce complete

records pertaining to the recommendations made by the State

Directorate to respondent No.3 on the next date of hearing.

List on 21.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4855/2020

18.10.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, proxy counsel

.

for the petitioners.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, proxy counsel for
respondents No. 1, 2 and 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.3.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file reply. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

learned Deputy Advocate General, states that he is under

instructions not to file separate reply and would be adopting

the reply of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. His statement is taken

on record.

List on 8.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4854/2020

18.10.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, proxy counsel

.

for the petitioners.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, proxy counsel for
respondents No. 1, 2 and 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.3.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file reply. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

learned Deputy Advocate General, states that he is under

instructions not to file separate reply and would be adopting

the reply of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. His statement is taken

on record.

List on 8.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4856/2020

18.10.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, proxy counsel

.

for the petitioners.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, proxy counsel for
respondents No. 1, 2 and 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.3.

Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file reply. Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

learned Deputy Advocate General, states that he is under

instructions not to file separate reply and would be adopting

the reply of respondents No. 1, 2 and 4. His statement is taken

on record.

List on 8.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4179/2019

18.10.2021 Present: Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, Advocate, proxy counsel

.

for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Steps for the service of respondent No.5 have not

been taken. The same, as prayed for, be taken within two

weeks, failing which name of respondent No.5 shall be struck

off from the array of respondents, subject to all just exceptions.

In the event of steps being taken, issue notice to

respondent No.5 returnable for 22.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

18.10.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6230/2021

30.9.2021 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 and 2.

CWP No. 6230/2021 & CMP No. 11778/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Issue notice to respondent

No.3 under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, during the course of the

day, returnable for 7.10.2021. In addition thereof, the

petitioner is also permitted to serve respondent No.3 through

whatsapp, e-mail or any other alternative mode.

Since the petitioner has already been relieved,

therefore, in the interim, the official respondents are restrained

from resorting to any coercive steps so as to compel the

petitioner to join at the transferred station. Records of the

transfer be also produced on the date already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
30.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6216/2021

30.9.2021 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.
Mr. Inderjet Singh Narwal, Advocate, for
respondent No.2.

CWP No. 6216/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Inderjeet Singh Narwal, Advocate,

appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective

respondents. Issue notice to respondents No. 3 to 12,

returnable for 11.11.2021, on taking steps within two days.

Reply by the appearing respondents in the meanwhile.

CMP No. 11761/2021

Heard. Promotion, if any, shall abide by further

orders/final order of this Court. Application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
30.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5504/2021

30.9.2021 Present: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, CGC, for

respondent No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents No. 2 to 4.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.2, which is being

adopted by respondents No. 3 and 4, is stated to have been

filed. Registry to trace and place the same on record. Reply on

behalf of respondent No.1, making therein specific averments

with regard to Annexure R-2 annexed with reply of respondent

No.2, be filed within four weeks. List on 11.11.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
30.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6130/2021

30.9.2021 Present: Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,

.

Advocate, for the petitioners.

Applications of amendment of the writ petition,

impleadment and amended petition have been filed in the

registry on 29.9.2021. The registry to trace and place the same

on record, even if it is under objections.

r to
List on 1.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
30.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5945/2021

30.9.2021 Present: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted one week's time to file necessary affidavit. We make it

clear that the affidavit shall be filed by an officer not below the

rank of Superintending Engineer.

List on 7.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
30.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6110/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Sood,

.

Mr. Jaiwant Patankar and Mr. Vijay Jain,

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to ascertain as to whether provisions

of
Himachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, 2019
have been

assailed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court or not.

List on 20.10.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6039/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

The petitioner to justify maintainability of the

petition. As prayed for, list on 20.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge
29.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5950/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5926/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5923/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5922/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5921/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5920/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5918/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5906/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Leaving all questions of law open, admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5905/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bomet Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

The petitioner to justify maintainability of the

petition as admittedly he has retired on 31.3.2017 and seeks to

avail benefit of notification, issued much after his retirement,

on 21.2.2018 (Annexure P-3).

r to
List on 6.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5854/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Admit.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5762/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rupinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 to 3.

CWP No. 5762/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted six

weeks' time to file reply. List on 10.11.2021.

CMP No. 11253/2021

The application is allowed with a direction to the

applicants to file typed/translated copies of the Annexures in

question within a period of six weeks. The application stands

disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 46/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

FAO (FC) No. 46/2021 & CMP No. 11705/2021

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable for,

10.11.2021, on taking steps within two days. In the

meanwhile, execution and operation of the impugned judgment

r to
and decree dated 11.1.2021 is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6125/2021

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 to 3.

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Issue notice to respondent

No.4 under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for 5.10.2021.

Since the petitioner has already been relieved, therefore, the

official respondents are restrained from resorting to any

coercive steps so as to compel the petitioner to join at the

transferred station. Records of the transfer be also produced

on the date already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
29.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr.A. No. 426/2019

29.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. For the appellant.
Mr. B. N. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent.

Cr.MP No. 1860/2021

Respondent/applicant is present in person. She is

permitted to furnish personal bonds in terms of order dated

14.8.2021 to the satisfaction of the Registrar(Judicial) during

the course of the day. Application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
29.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6125/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 to 3.

CWP No. 6125/2021 & CMP No. 11663/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3. Issue notice to respondent

No.4 under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for 5.10.2021.

Since the petitioner has already been relieved, therefore, the

official respondents are restrained from resorting to any

coercive steps so as to compel the petitioner to join at the

transferred station. Records of the transfer be also produced

on the date already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj) SH. RAMESH KAUNDAL

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6126/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Shivank S. Panta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

CWP No. 6126/2021 & CMP No. 11665/2021

Notice. Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Senior Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted one

day's time to obtain instructions.

List on 29.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6127/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashwani Kaundal, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 and 2.

CWP No. 6127/2021 & CMP No. 11666/2021

Notice is confined to respondents No. 1 and 2 at

this stage. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of

respondents No. 1 and 2.

List on 5.10.2021. Reply/instructions in the

meanwhile.

CMP No. 11667/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicants to file English translation of the annexures in

question within one week.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6128/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

List on 30.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6129/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Janesh Majahan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondents No.
1 to 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondent No.5.

CWP No. 6129/2021 & CMP No. 11670/2021

Government Counsel
r to
Notice. Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, learned Central

and Mr. Vinod Thakur,

Additional Advocate General appear and waive service of notice
learned

on behalf of the respective respondents. List on 30.9.2021.

Reply/instructions in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6129/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Janesh Majahan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondents No.
1 to 4.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondent No.5.

CWP No. 6129/2021 & CMP No. 11670/2021

Government Counsel
r to
Notice. Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, learned Central

and Mr. Vinod Thakur,

Additional Advocate General appear and waive service of notice
learned

on behalf of the respective respondents. List on 30.9.2021.

Reply/instructions in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6131/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 2 and 3.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondents No.
1 and 4.

CWP No. 6131/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, learned Central

Government Counsel, appear and waive service of notice on

behalf of the respective respondents. They pray for and are

granted one week's time to obtain instructions/file reply.

List on 5.10.2021.

CMP No. 11673/2021

No case for interim relief is made out at this stage.

The application is dismissed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.6132/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for respondents No. 1 and 2.

CWP No. 6132/2021 & CMP No. 11674/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Issue notice to respondent

No.3 returnable for 26.10.2021, on taking steps within two

days. In the meanwhile, transfer order dated 24.8.2021

(Annexure P-1) is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1959/2018

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel

.

for the petitioner.

Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondents
No. 1 and 2.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent
No.3.

Counter to status report as also rejoinder not filed.

The same be filed within four weeks. List on 26.10.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6130/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,

.

Advocate, for the respondents.

List on 30.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

28.9.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2843/2019

28.9.2021 Present: Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate, for the

.
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Maan Singh, Adocate, vice counsel for
respondent No.5.

CWP No. 2843/2019

List along with connected matters on 30.9.2021.

CMP No. 11600/2021

The pleadings are yet to complete. Therefore, the

instant application for early hearing of the petition being

misconceived is dismissed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3193/2019 & CWP No. 3601/2021

28.9.2021 Present: Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner

.

in CWP No.3193/2019

Mr. M.L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No.3601/2021.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.2 in CWP No. 3193/2021.

Despite repeated opportunities, respondent No.2 in

CWP No. 3193/2019 has failed to file reply. Let needful be

done within three weeks, failing which responsible officer of

respondent No.2 shall personally remain present before the

Court on the next date of hearing along with the relevant

record.

List on 19.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1011/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for
respondent No.3.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General states that reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2

is being filed during the course of the day. His statement is

taken on record. Reply on behalf of respondent no.3 stands

filed.

List along with CWP No. 995/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1012/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, vice counsel for
respondent No.3.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General states that reply on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2

is being filed during the course of the day. His statement is

taken on record. Reply on behalf of respondent no.3 stands

filed.

List along with CWP No. 995/2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3018/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, CGC, for respondent
No.5.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 30.9.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3096/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh Bansal, Advocate, vice counsel for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate, for respondent

No.3.

Mr. Varun Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Pleadings be completed within one week.

r to
List on 5.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3100/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,

.

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Rejoinder, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 1.11.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3119/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Mr. Sunil Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Compliance report filed by the Director, Technical

Education, in the open Court is ordered to be taken on record.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray for and are granted

one week's time to go through the same.

List on 4.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3513/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. V.D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondents-State.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, CGC, for respondent No.3.

CMP No. 11481/2021

Heard. Since the proposed amendment seeks to

assail the consideration order dated 7.9.2021, that has been

passed during the pendency of the instant petition, therefore,

the instant application for amendment of the writ petition is

allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 3513/2021

Amended writ petition is taken on record. Reply to

the amended petition, as prayed for, be filed within three

weeks. List for consideration on 25.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3653/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Amit

.

Jamwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for respondents No. 5 & 6.

Learned counsel for respondents No. 5 and 6 prays

for and is granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 25.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

LPA No. 41/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondents-State.

Mr. K.B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the contemnors.
Mr. Anil Soni (Editor) and Mr. Neelkant (Bureau
Chief), Divya Himachal in person.

After arguing for some time, Mr. K.B. Khajuria,

Advocate, prays for and is granted one week's time to file better

affidavit.

List on 4.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3172/2021

27.9.2021 Present: Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. J. L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.
1 to 17 and 19 to 23.

The Presiding Officer, Central Government

Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court-II, Chandigarh, has

failed to remit the relevant records despite intimation sent by

the registry of this Court on 15.9.2021.

Therefore, let an urgent reminder, along with a

copy of this Order, through FAX and e-mail, be sent to the

concerned Presiding Officer, to remit the records so as to reach

before this Court well before the next date of hearing.

List on 30.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
27.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 856/2018

.

24.9.2021 Present: Mr. G. C. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera
Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondents-State.

Er. Ajeet Negi, Executive Engineer & Er. Anirudh
Balnatha, Assistant Engineer, JSV Matiana in
person.

We have interacted for sufficient long time with

Er. Ajeet Negi, Executive Engineer JSV Matiana and have

tried to comprehend the water problem as is being faced by

the inhabitants of villages Laffu, Raich Tangi, Manj Gaon,

Lambidhar, Chamech Koti Karyal, Lanu, Challan (Khanoo)

and other surrounding inhabitants.

We are of the considered view that this issue

can conveniently be resolved in case the officials of the

respondent-JSV carry out study regarding utilization of

water prior to commissioning of the scheme in the year

2007.

In addition thereto, officials of the respondent-

JSV are required to hold periodic meetings with Gram

Panchayat(s) so as to understand and thereafter resolve the

issues in a more compatible fashion. Let both the exercises

be done within a period of three weeks.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

The Pradhan, Gram Panchayat, Kathog, is directed to

render full cooperation to the team of the respondent-JSV.

.

Let first meeting be held on 2.10.2021 and if

need arises, successive meetings be also held.

List on 22.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge

24.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr. A. No. 327/2019

24.9.2021 Present: Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondent.

On the request of Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate,

list on 28.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4893/2021

23.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Manik Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel

Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for
the respondent-State.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. R. L. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun K. Lal,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Heard for some time. The instant lis is primarily

between the petitioner and Shalooni University, which, for

some strange reasons, has not been arrayed as party

respondent.

2 Accordingly, we deem it proper to array Shalooni

University of Biotechnology & Management Science, Post Box

No.9, Head Post Office Solan, Distt. Solan, HP-173212 as party

respondent, which shall now figure as respondent No.3.

Ordered accordingly.

3 Issue notice to respondent No.3. Mr. Arjun K. Lal,

Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of

respondent No.3. Let a complete copy of the petition be

supplied to the learned counsel for respondent No.3 during the

course of the day.

4 At this stage, Mr. R.L. Sood, learned Sr. Advocate

assisted by Mr. Arjun K. Lal, Advocate, would argue that the

instant petition is liable to be dismissed at the threshold as on

the one hand, the petitioner claims himself to be a leading

jurist of this country and on the other hand, he has failed to

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

array Shalooni University as party respondent. Even the

reference of three opportunities, that have been granted to the

.

petitioner, has not been specifically stated in the petition.

5 In rebuttal, Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, learned Sr.

Advocate, assisted by Mr. Manik Sethi, Advocate, would argue

that since he has already annexed relevant orders, therefore,

this ground is neither contentious nor changeable at the

instance of respondent-University.

6 We are not at all inclined to entertain any of these

submissions at this stage.

7 Learned counsel for respondent No.3 prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

8 List on 28.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
23.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Petition No. 140/2019

23.9.2021 Present: Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondents-State.

Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2
to 9.

On 26.8.2021, this Court passed the following

order:

"Reply to the execution petition was filed as far as back

on 16.3.2020. Thereafter, a lot of changes have taken

place including recommendations of the case of the
petitioner for regularization which is stated to be
pending before the Board of Management and probably

for want of meeting, no decision has been taken.
Therefore, the respondent-State is directed to convene
the meeting of Board of Management within two weeks

and take a decision, as aforesaid; and report
compliance on the next date of hearing.

List on 23.9.2021.

Copy dasti."

2 It appears that while passing the aforesaid order,

this Court was not apprised of the latest factual position,

which has now come on record by way of supplementary

affidavit filed on behalf of the Registrar of the respondent-

University, which reveals that the meetings of the Finance

Committee and Board of Management had already been held

on 9.6.2021 and 11.6.2021 respectively, wherein it was

observed as under:

"The Finance Committee discussed and considered the
proposal but did not approve the same, as this proposal
was not examined/prepared as per policy. Moreover, no

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

financial liability has been worked out in respect of this
proposal."

.

3 The supplementary affidavit further reveals that

the matter has bee n referred to the Students Welfare Officer

for calculating the financial liability on account of Mess

Helpers/Cooks, who have been reinstated on outsource basis.

4 Now that the matter has been referred to the

Students Welfare Officer, it is expected that an early decision

in the matter would be taken by the said officer.

5 Accordingly, the matter is adjourned to

25.11.2021, when fresh status report be filed by Registrar of

the respondent-University.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

23.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Petition No. 200/2020

23.9.2021 Present: Ms. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., Svaneel
Jaswal and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for

the respondents-State.

Mr. Ajit Kumar Thakur, Chief Conservator of
Forests, Rampur, in person.

Mr. Ajit Kumar Thakur, Chief Conservator of

Forests, Rampur, who is present in person, has assured the

Court that henceforth, there will be no unnecessary inter-

department correspondence(s), more particularly, relating to

the cases of forest clearance in terms of the
Forest

(Conservation) Act, 1980
and the
Scheduled Tribes and Other

Traditional Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006

and the same shall be attended to promptly. He has further

assured this Court that the case of the petitioner under the

FRA shall be forwarded to the concerned authority within

three weeks. His statement is taken on record.

We appreciate the fair stand taken by the Chief

Conservator of Forests, Rampur. Let the approval be now sent

to the Nodal Officer within three weeks, who in turn, shall

send it to the State Government within one week.

Let the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, be

apprised of this order as also deliberations, which have taken

place in the Court today.

List on 28.10.2021, when the respondents-State

shall apprise the Court regarding the proposal.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Personal presence of the Chief Conservator of

Forests, Rampur, is dispensed with.

.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

23.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

LPA No. 458/2012

22.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

appellants.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

As jointly prayed for, list on 29.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge
22.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3123/2021 with CWP No.1398/2018

22.9.2021 Present: Ms. Vandana Misra, petitioner in person, in CWP

.

No.3123/2021.

Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No. 1398/2018.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for respondent No.4.

Mr. Vijay Arora, Advocate, for respondent No.6-
BSNL.

Mr. Abhishek Banta, Advocate, for respondent
No.7-Airtel.

Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Suneet Goel,
Advocate, for respondent No.8-Reliance Jio

Infocomm Ltd.

Ms. Seema Guleria, Advocate, for respondent No.9.
Mr.Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.10-BSNL.

Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.11.

Mr. Mukesh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.12.

Mr. Sandeep Dutta, Advocate, for respondent
No.13.

Mr. Mohan Lal, ADG and Mr. Mayank Negi, ACCA,
in person.

Record of Revision No. 2/2019 (SLM), titled as

IDEA Cellular Ltd. (ATC) vs. State of H.P.
, be requisitioned

from the court of Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Shimla

so as to reach before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 29.9.2021

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
22.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3930/2021

21.9.2021 Present: Mr. S. D. Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Heard. Let complete records of the transfer in

question be produced on the next date of hearing.

List on 24.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
21.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.1797/2021

21.9.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Reply filed on behalf of the official respondents in

the open court is taken on record. Learned Deputy Advocate

General states that one post of Forest Guard is lying vacant in

Bhabanagar. He prays for and is granted two days' time to

obtain instructions.

List on 24.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
21.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

LPA No. 57/2021

21.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal

Manhans, Mr. Vinod Thakur, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant.

Notice issued to the respondent has been received

back unserved for want of correct address. Let fresh steps for

the service of respondent be taken within two weeks.

List on 5.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
21.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CEA No.1/2017

16.9.2021 Present: Mr.Vijay Arora, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Naveen Mullick, Mr. Vishal Mohan and Mr.

Praveen Sharma, Advocates, for the respondent.

One of the main issues, as raised in this appeal, is

stated to be covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs. Commissioner of C.Ex,

Chandigarh
, 2012(279) ELT 194 (HP), however the parties

are

before the

consideration.

r Hon'ble

ad idem that the aforesaid judgment has been assailed

Supreme Court and is pending

Therefore, in the given circumstances, we deem it

proper to modify the order dated 20.6.2017 directing the

appellant to refund the amount in cash, in terms of the

impugned order, to the respondent, however, subject to

furnishing surety on behalf of the respondent-Firm as also in

individual capacity of the partners of the respondent-Firm to

the satisfaction of the concerned Jurisdictional Assessing

Officer.

It is made clear that in the event of the appeal

being succeeded, the respondent shall deposit the amount

in question with the appellant along with interest @ 6% per

annum.

List in due course, reserving liberty to the

appellant to seek listing of the appeal as and when the

aforesaid matter is decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

(Satyen Vaidya)

.

Judge

16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CEA No.1/2017

16.9.2021 Present: Mr.Vijay Arora, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Naveen Mullick, Mr. Vishal Mohan and Mr.

Praveen Sharma, Advocates, for the respondent.

One of the main issues, as raised in this appeal, is

stated to be covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in

Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs. Commissioner of C.Ex,

Chandigarh
, 2012(279) ELT 194 (HP), however the parties

are

before the

consideration.

r Hon'ble

ad idem that the aforesaid judgment has been assailed

Supreme Court and is pending

Therefore, in the given circumstances, we deem it

proper to modify the order dated 20.6.2017 directing the

appellant to refund the amount in cash, in terms of the

impugned order, to the respondent, however, subject to

furnishing surety on behalf of the respondent-Firm as also in

individual capacity of the partners of the respondent-Firm to

the satisfaction of the concerned Jurisdictional Assessing

Officer.

List in due course, reserving liberty to the

appellant to seek listing of the appeal as and when the

aforesaid matter is decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CMP-T No.1328/2020

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner/applicant.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

CMP-T No. 1328/2020

Heard. In view of the order passed by the learned

Ram
r vs.

Division Bench of this Court in COPC No. 181/2018, titled as

Kumat Dr. Amarjeet Kumar

19.11.2018, we are clearly of the view that the original
Sharma, dated

application has been filed within the prescribed period of

limitation. Therefore, delay in filing of the original application

is ordered to be condoned. Application stands disposed of.

CWPOA No._____________/2021

Be registered. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within

six weeks. List thereafter.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.53/2019

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. Neeraj Maniktala, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Sh. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, for respondents
No. 2,6 and 7.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate, for respondent
No.9

CMP No. 10861/2021

Heard. There is a typographical error in memo of

parties as reflected in the order dated 6.9.2021 and the same

is ordered to be corrected strictly in accordance with memo of

parties, as reflected in page 1 of the paper book. In addition

thereto, name of Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, learned counsel for

respondent No.9, be also reflected in the order dated

6.9.2021.

The application is allowed and disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3018/2021

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Prima facie, the issue in question is no longer res

integra in view of the judgment rendered by learned Division

Bench of this Court in LPA No.36/2010, titled as
Sita Ram

vs. State of H.P.
& ors., dated 15.7.2010, wherein it was

held that "It is also settled principle of law that any service that

is counted for the purpose of increment, will count for pension

also."

Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted one week's time to obtain

instructions.

List on 23.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.4107/2021

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Athrav

.

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondent-State.
Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Avneesh
Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

issue in question is squarely covered by the judgment rendered

by learned Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 8/2018,

titled as Manoj Kumar & ors. vs. State of H.P. & ors.,

dated 15.12.2017.

Confronted with this, learned counsel for

respondents No. 2 and 3 prays for and is granted two weeks'

time to obtain instructions.

List on 7.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2692/2021

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Admit. List before SB-III along with CWP No.

r to
1980/2018 on the date already fixed, i.e. 16.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 174/2021

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. S. P. Chatterji, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.

CMP No.10817/2021

Since the claim of the petitioner/applicant has

been partly accepted, therefore, order dated 24.8.2021, for

which instant application seeking modification has been filed,

is accordingly modified and instead of word "rejected", the

same be read as "partly allowed". The application stands

disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr.MPM No. 1524/2019

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal

Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the appellant.

Ms. Shivani, Advocate, vice counsel for the

respondents.

It is rather surprising that the appellant-State has

not been able to place on record certified copy of Ext. PW-

3.3.2020.

r to
11/C, despite having been granted time as far as back on

As a matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last

and final opportunity, two weeks' further time is granted to do

the needful, failing which Superintendent of Police, Kangra,

shall remain personally present before this Court on the next

date of hearing.

List on 30.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 31/2021

16.9.2021 Present: Mr. G. R. Palsra, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the
respondent.

The parties are present and they are not averse in

making an endeavour to settle the matter amicably.

As jointly prayed for, Mr. S.C. Sharma, learned

Senior Advocate and a Trained Mediator of this Court is

appointed as Mediator to mediate between the parties. The

parties to appear before the learned Mediator at 1.00 P.M.

today i.e. 16.9.2021 at Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

16.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr.A. No. 137/2021

14.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the appellants.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder
Dogra, Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr.
Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.

A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for
the respondent-State.

Cr.MP No.1358/2021

Appellant/applicant No.2, Jasmer Singh, has

once again moved the instant application for suspension

of sentence. Earlier application (Cr.MP No.973/2021) was

rejected at the time of admission of the appeal vide order

dated 22.6.2021.

2 In the application now filed, it has been

averred that the applicant has two minor daughters and

one mentally retarded and physically challenged son.

Moreover, wife of the applicant is due for delivery and the

expected date is 21.9.2021. According to him, his family is

at the stage of starvation.

3 The respondent-State was put to notice and in

the instructions handed over to the Court, which are

made part of the record, the aforesaid facts have not been

denied.

4 Though, the applicant has been convicted and

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of

ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default

of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

imprisonment for one year, for the offence punishable

under
Section 20(b)(ii)(c)
of the Narcotic Drugs and

.

Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, however that, in

itself, does not affect the power of this Court to suspend

the sentence or grant the bail to the applicant; if

compelling and exceptional circumstances so warrant.

This power cannot be exercised in a routine and casual

manner, but has to be exercised sparingly, that too, in

exceptional circumstances.

5 Having regard to the totality of the facts and

circumstances of the instant case, more particularly,

taking into consideration the penurious circumstances

and indigent situation, in which the family of the

applicant is placed, we deem it proper to suspend the

sentence of the applicant for a period of three months.

Ordered accordingly.

6 Consequently, the applicant is ordered to be

released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond in the

sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to

the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent.

7 The applicant shall surrender himself on the

expiry of three months from today i.e. 14.12.2021 before

the Jail Superintendent, Bilaspur.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

8 This order has been passed in the peculiar

facts and circumstances of the case, therefore, the same

.

shall not be treated as precedent in future.

9. The application is allowed in the aforesaid

terms and disposed of.

CMP No. 1359/2021

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and

the applicant is exempted from filing the typed copies of

Annexures in question. The application stands disposed

of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
14.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.5199/2021

14.9.2021 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for the respondents.
Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the
applicant in CMP No. 10857/2021.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 16.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
r Judge
14.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5124/2021

14.9.2021 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for the

.
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.9.

Learned counsel for the respondents jointly pray

for and are granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 19.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
14.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex.Pet. No.66/2021

14.9.2021 Present: None.

.

List on 15.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

14.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No.38/2021

14.9.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

FAO (FC) No.38/2021 & CMP No. 10452/2021

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, states that the

appellant has withdrawn the application, that was pending

before the learned Family Court, for setting aside the ex-parte

judgment dated 17.10.2020 passed in HMA petition No. 98-S/3

of 2020. His statement is taken on record.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable for

26.10.2021, on taking steps within two days. In the

meanwhile, operation and execution of the judgment and

decree dated 17.10.2020 passed by the learned Family Court is

ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
14.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 167/2021

13.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Saklani, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

This matter has been listed under the caption

"Speaking to the Minutes". Inadvertently, the date of decision

in the instant petition at the end has been mentioned as 25th

August, 2021, whereas it should have been 2nd September,

2021. Ordered accordingly.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
13.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2882/2020

13.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Saklani, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

The compliance report in this case already stands

filed. Therefore, no further orders are required to be passed

and the matter is closed.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

13.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5245/2021

13.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Saklani, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

CWP No. 5245/2021 & CMP No. 10800/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents-State.

Prima facie, consideration order dated 11.8.2021 is

in the teeth of the judgment rendered by learned Single Judge

of this court in CWP No. 767/2021, titled as
Sanjay Chadha

vs. State of H.P.
, decided on 9.7.2021.

Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted three days' time to obtain

instructions.

List on 17.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
13.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 3986/2020

13.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Saklani, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Karan Singh Parmar, proxy counsel, for the
respondent.

CMPT No. 563/2021

The instant application being formal in nature, as

it seeks to lay challenge to the rejection order dated 25.9.2017,

is allowed and disposed of.

CWPOA No. 3986/2020

Amended petition be filed within four weeks. List

on 18.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

13.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5200/2021

13.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Saklani, proxy counsel, for the petitioner.

.

List along with connected matter on the date

already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
13.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1648/2018 a/w CWP No.63/2019

CWP No. 1648/2018

.

8.9.2021 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathour, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.

Mr. Mehar Chand Jamwal, Advocate, for
respondent No.9.

CWP No. 63/2019

Mr. Mehar Chand Jamwal, Advocate, for
the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Mr. Shaurya Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Reply to CWP No.1648/2018 is stated to be filed

by respondents No. 1 to 4 and 6. The same be traced and

placed on record. List on 29.9.2021. In the meanwhile, reply be

also be filed by remaining respondents.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
8.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4569/2021

7.9.2021 Present: Mr. Rakesh. K. Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for respondents No.
2 to 4.

Reply filed by the respondents-Corporation is

evasive. Therefore, let supplementary affidavit, clearly setting

out therein r as to how soon temporary deployment of the

petitioner is going to end and what permanent arrangements

have respondents made following resignation of the Junior

Engineer posted there, be filed before the next date of hearing.

List on 21.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

7.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.4515/2021

7.9.2021 Present: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.
Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Learned counsel for respondent No.4 states that

after institution of the instant petition, the petitioner has again

tried to procure D.O. note. Let details whereof be supplied on

the next date of hearing.

List on 8.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
7.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4637/2021

7.9.2021 Present: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. List along with CWP No. 3752/2021

on 15.9.2021. Reply in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
7.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4636/2021

7.9.2021 Present: Mr. A. K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Leaving all questions of law open, notice. Mr.

Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appears

and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He

prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 26.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
7.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5078/2021

6.9.2021 Present: Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1

and 3.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta,Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocate, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective

respondents.

List along with CWP No. 3894/2021 on the date

already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
6.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2067/2019

6.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the petitioners.

Mr. Vir Bahadur Verma, Central Government

Counsel for the respondent-Union of India.
Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent-
Pollution Control Board.

Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

r to
List in due course.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5078/2021

6.9.2021 Present: Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No.1

and 3.

Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta,Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Sanjeev K. Motta, Advocate, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective

respondents.

List along with CWP No. 3894/2021 on the date

already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
6.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5054/2021

6.9.2021 Present: Mr. B. P. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun

.

Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

CMP No. 10512/2021

For the reasons stated in the application, the same

is allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 5054/2021 & CMP No. 10385/2021

Amended memo of parties is taken on record.

Notice is confined to respondents No.5A and 5B at this stage.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General,

appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the aforesaid

respondents. He prays for and is granted two weeks' time to

file reply. List on 20.9.2021. In the meanwhile, the parties are

directed to maintain status quo as existing on the spot as on

the date.

CMP Nos. 10386/2021 & 10387/2021

The applications are allowed with direction to the

applicant to file the translated/typed copies of the Annexures

in issue within two weeks. The applications stand disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1730 of 2014 a/w CWPs
No.2120, 3319, 4498, 5871 of
2014 and CWP No.2933 of 2016.

.

CWP No.1730 of 2014.

4.09.2021 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shalini Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

CWP No.2120 of 2014.

Mr. B.C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shalini Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.6.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.

CWP No.3319 of 2014

Mr. K.S. Banyal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.K. Sharma,
Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shalini Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.

Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with

.

Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.8.

CWP No.4498 of 2014

Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod

Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shalini Thakur,

Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.7.

Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.8.

CWP No.5871 of 2014

Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar,
Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the
respondents-State.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Mr. V. S. Chauhan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shalini Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.3.

CWP No.2933 of 2016

Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod
Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. J.S.
Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate
Generals, for the respondents-State.
Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Ms. Megha Kapur Gautam, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

.

(Sandeep Sharma)
Judge
4th September, 2021

(pankaj)

r to

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5071/2021

4.9.2021 Present: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, for
respondents No.2 & 3.

CWP No. 5071/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective

respondents. Issue notice to respondents No. 4 and 5 returnable

for 27.9.2021. Reply by the appearing respondents in the

meanwhile.

CMP No. 10424/2021

Heard. Setting up of new petrol pump by respondents

No. 2 and 3 shall abide by final order/further orders of this Court.

Application stands disposed of.

CMP No.10425/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to the

applicant to file translated copies of Annexures in issue within a

period of four weeks.

CMP No. 10427/2021

The application, as prayed for, is allowed and

disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4091/2019

4.9.2021 Present: Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents- State.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 20.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

4.9.2021
(pankaj)
r to (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2123/2017

3.9.2021 Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
3.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4856/2021

3.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

On the request of learned Deputy Advocate

General, list on 10.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
3.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4355/2021

3.9.2021 Present: Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranay

.

Pratap Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 4.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3167/2021

3.9.2021 Present: Mr. Pankaj Bhardwaj, Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Mr.

.

Munish Thakur, Mr. R.L. Verma, Advocates, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondents-
State.

Dy.S.P. Kailash Chander, Narcotics, Distt.
Amritsar (Rural), Punjab, Inspector Lovepreet
Singh, SHO/IO, Police Station Ghrinda, Inspector
Gurwinder Singh, I.O. PBI-CAP Amritsar(Rural), SI
Jasjit Singh and SI Kewal Singh, Mattewal,

District Amritsar (Rural), Punjab in person.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

3.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4819/2021

2.9.2021 Present: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

CWP No. 4819/2021 & CMP No. 10246/2021

List before the Principal Bench on 9.9.2021. Till

then, the official respondents are restrained from resorting to

any coercive steps against respondent No.5 so as to compel her

to join at Govt. Degree College Hamirpur pursuant to office

order dated 31.8.2021 (Annexure RA-1). Respondent No.5, in

the interregnum, be permitted to avail leave of the kind due.

List on 9.9.2021. Interim order to continue.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3450/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. P. S. Goverdhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1918/2021 & CWP No. 1917/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Peeyush Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner in

.

CWP No. 1917/2018

Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner in
CWP No. 1918/2021.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

These cases have been ordered to be listed on the

1917/2021.

We have

basis of mention memo made by the petitioner in CWP No.

clearly observed, vide order dated

5.5.2021, that there is no urgency in the matter. This position

was reiterated vide order dated 28.6.2021 when these cases

were again listed on the basis of mention memo.

Even today, these cases have again been listed

before this Court on the basis of mention memo and the same

obviously cannot be taken up for admission/hearing in view of

the earlier orders passed by this court. Ordered accordingly.

In case the petitioner feel that there is some

urgency in these cases, then the only course available to him is

to seek modification, variation or recalling of order dated

5.5.2021 and 28.6.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr. Appeal No. 151/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant.

Respondent in person.

Respondent, who is present in present, states that

he cannot bear the expenses of a Lawyer. Therefore, we deem it

r to
proper to appoint Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, as Legal Aid

Counsel, in the instant case. Ordered accordingly.

Mr. Onkar Jairath, who is also present in the

Court, has graciously accepted the request made by us for

representing the respondent.

Accordingly, the registry is directed to reflect

name of Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the respondent, in

the cause list henceforth.

Admit. Call for the records.

After receipt of the records, a copy of complete

paper book be supplied to Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, at the

expenses of H.P. State Legal Services Authority.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2626/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Ms. Archana Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Sushant Vir Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

states that the order in question has been fully complied with.

Her statement is taken on record.

In view of above, no further orders are required to

be passed and the matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1877/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

states that the order in question has been fully complied with.

His statement is taken on record.

In view of above, no further orders are required to

be passed and the matter is closed.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CMP(M) No. 536/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Reply not filed. The same be positively filed within

two weeks. List on 15.9.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
1.9.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Cr. A. No. 210/2021

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant.

It appears that the bailable warrant issued against

the respondent has not been executed in view of certain

clarifications sought by the Ministry of Home Affairs, New

Delhi.

Confronted with this, learned Deputy Advocate

General prays for and is granted four weeks' time to comply

with the requirements, as sought by the Ministry of Home

Affairs, New Delhi.

List on 6.10.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 461/2020

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that

only interest remains to be paid to the petitioner. He prays for

and is granted two weeks' further time to do the needful.

List on 15.9.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex.Pet. No. 91/2020

1.9.2021 Present: Mr. V. D. Khidtta, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Heard. Prima facie, we are of the considered view

that the stand taken by the respondents to deny the back

Industrial

wages to the petitioner is not at all sustainable in the eyes of

law for the reason that the petitioner had already approached

the

Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Shimla, for

redressal of his grievances and in terms of order passed by the

Industrial Tribunal, which has attained finality upto the

Hon'ble Supreme Court, he was held entitled to back wages

from April 1997 till the date of his superannuation on

31.1.2007.

Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted two weeks' time to go through

the records of the case.

List on 15.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
1.9.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 6358/2020

31.8.2021 Present: Mr. J. L. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.
Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

It appears that the promotion to the post of Deputy

Registrar has been stayed since 26.2.2019.

We really wonder how this could have been done.

The post of Deputy Registrar is a functional post in the

University. The individual dispute cannot have primacy over

the larger public interest. Therefore, we deem it proper to

vacate the stay granted on 26.2.2019. Ordered accordingly.

However, we clarify that the promotion, if any, shall be subject

to the final outcome of the instant petition.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an

application for amendment of the petition in the open court,

which is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the respondents jointly pray

for and are granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List for consideration on 14.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
31.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4032/2020

31.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' further time to file reply on behalf of

r to
respondents No. 1, 4 and 5. List on 13.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
31.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4031/2020

31.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' further time to file reply on behalf of

r to
respondents No. 1, 4 and 5. List on 13.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
31.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 35/2021

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Kulwant Chauhan, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

CMP(M) No. 634/2021

The appeal is within time in terms of order passed

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 27.4.2021. Therefore, this

application seeking condonation of delay in filing of the appeal

is clearly misconceived and is disposed of as such.

FAO (FC) No. 35/2021 & CMP No. 10026/2021

Issue notice to the respondent returnable for

20.9.2021, on taking steps within two days. In the meanwhile,

operation and execution of the impugned judgment dated

9.4.2021 in case No. 16/2019 passed by the learned Additional

District Judge (II) Una, is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3521/2021

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

List on 2.9.2021, when typed copies of Annexures

R-1 to R-4 accompanying short reply be placed on record.

such illegible copies.

r to
Registry is directed to be careful in future in not accepting

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1609/2020

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. M. L. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. N. K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.
Mr. Sumit Himalvi, Advocate, vice counsel for
respondent No.4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file rejoinder(s).

List on 16.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4325/2021

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents.

Since the petitioner has been adjusted in one of

the stations of his choice, i.e. Govt. AHC Ghagas, District

Bilaspur, therefore, no further orders are required to be

passed and the matter is closed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2504/2019

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record instructions dated 25.8.2021, which would go to

reveal that the permitted activity, for which the plot was

allotted, has still not been started.

Confronted with this, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks' time to obtain

instructions.

List on 9.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 282/2021

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Compliance affidavit is stated to have been filed.

The same be traced and placed on record, even if it is under

objections. Counter to the same, if any, be filed within two

weeks.

List on 9.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5855/2020

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the respondents.

On the request of learned counsel for the

respondents, list along with connected matters on 8.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5353/2020

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate, for the respondents.

On the request of learned counsel for the

respondents, list along with connected matters on 8.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4823/2021

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

and 2.

CWP No. 4823/2021 & CMP No. 9950/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Issue notice to respondent

No.3, under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for 8.9.2021, on

taking steps within two days. In the meanwhile, operation of

the impugned order of transfer dated 8.8.2021 (Annexure P-4)

qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. Pet. No. 140/2019

26.8.2021 Present: Mr. Lalit K. Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.1.

Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2
to 9.

Reply to the execution petition was filed as far as

back on 16.3.2020. Thereafter, a lot of changes have taken

place including recommendations of the case of the petitioner

for regularization which is stated to be pending before the

Board of Management and probably for want of meeting, no

decision has been taken. Therefore, the respondent-State is

directed to convene the meeting of Board of Management

within two weeks and take a decision, as aforesaid; and report

compliance on the next date of hearing.

List on 23.9.2021.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4823/2021

25.8.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

and 2.

CWP No. 4823/2021 & CMP No. 9950/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Issue notice to respondent

No.3, under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for 8.9.2021, on

taking steps within two days. In the meanwhile, operation of

the impugned order of transfer dated 8.8.2021 (Annexure P-4)

qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
25.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4817/2021

25.8.2021 Present: Mr. Amrinder Singh Rana, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

CWP No. 4817/2021 & CMP No. 9936/2021

Notice. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays

for and is granted four weeks' time to file reply.

List on 29.9.2021. In the meanwhile, operation of

the impugned order of transfer dated 19.8.2021 (Annexure P-3)

is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

25.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4797/2021

25.8.2021 Present: Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

CWP No. 4797/2021

Notice. Mr. Avinash Jaryal, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Issue

notice to respondent No.2 returnable for 8.9.2021, on taking

steps within two days.

CMP No. 9853/2021

Heard. The appointment of respondent No.2 shall

abide by the subsequent order/final order that may be passed

by this Court. Application stands disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
25.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4777/2021

24.8.2021 Present: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

CWP No. 4777/2021 & CMP No. 9853/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two

weeks' time to file reply/obtain instructions. List on 9.9.2021.

In the meanwhile, impugned order of transfer dated 19.8.2021

(Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4773/2021

24.8.2021 Present: Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1
to 5.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

CWP No. 4773/2021

Leaving all questions of law including non-joinder

of necessary parties open, issue notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur,

learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Vikrant Thakur,

Advocate, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the

respective respondents. They pray for and are granted four

weeks' time to file reply. List on 28.9.2021.

CMP No. 9846/2021

Heard. The promotion, if any, shall abide by the

final outcome of the writ petition. Application stands disposed

of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4763/2021

24.8.2021 Present: Mr. Umesh Kanwar, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

to 3.

CWP No. 4763/2021 & CMP No. 9812/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

r to
Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. Issue dasti notice to respondent

No.4, returnable for 21.9.2021, on taking steps within two

days.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4754/2021

24.8.2021 Present: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

issue in question is squarely covered by judgment rendered by

this Court in CWP No. 3544/2 019, titled as State of H.P. &

anr. vs. Surendera Sharma & ors., dated 6.11.2020 (Annexure

P-3).

Confronted with this, learned Additional Advocate

General prays for and is granted four weeks' time to file

reply/obtain instructions.

List on 21.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3744/2019

23.8.2021 Present: Mr. Praveen Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. S. P. Singh, ADGP (SV &ACB), Shimla and Dr.

Monika Bhutunguru, S.P. Shimla.

In compliance to the previous order, Mr. S. P.

Singh, ADGP (SV &ACB), Shimla and Dr. Monika Bhutunguru,

S.P. Shimla are present in person and have tendered their

unconditional apology for having not filed the reply within the

time granted by this Court and explained the circumstances

which prevented them to file the reply. As prayed for, reply be

filed within two weeks. Personal presence of the aforesaid

Officers is dispensed with. List on 6.9.2021.

CMP No. /2021

Be registered. Application as prayed for is allowed

and personal presence of respondent No.1 for the time being is

dispensed with.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
23.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4745/2021

23.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

CWP No. 4745/2021 & CMP No.9783/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. Reply be filed before the next date of

hearing. List on 4.9.2021 along with connected matters. In the

meanwhile, impugned order of recovery dated 13.7.2021

(Annexure P/9) qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
23.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4742/2021

23.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

CWP No. 4742/2021 & CMP No.9779/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. Reply be filed before the next date of

hearing. List on 4.9.2021 along with connected matters. In the

meanwhile, impugned order of recovery dated 13.7.2021

(Annexure P/9) qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
23.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4404/2021

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Why the petitioner is not being settled down is not

forthcoming in the reply. We observe so because initially vide

order dated 27.4.2021, the petitioner was temporarily adjusted

from Range Office Jari, Range under Paravati Forest Division at

Shamshi to Sainj Beat of Sainj Range under Seraj Forest

Division at Banjar. Thereafter, within three months, the

petitioner has again been temporarily adjusted from Sainj Beat

of Sainj Range under Seraj Forest Division to Banjar Range,

Seraj Forest Division at Banjar Range. Learned Additional

Advocate General prays for and is granted one week's time to

obtain instructions.

List on 27.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4426/2021

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the
respondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on

record certain instructions.

List on 23.8.2021. Interim order to continue.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Ex. P. No. 77/2019

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 25.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1648/2018 a/w CWP No.63/2019

CWP No. 1648/2018

.

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Rathour, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,

Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.

Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for respondent
No.9.

CWP No. 63/2019

Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.
Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent

No.4.

Mr. Shaurya Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional Advocate

General, states that the reply on behalf of respondents-State is

being filed during the course of the day.

As regards remaining respondents, reply be filed

within two weeks, failing which their right to file the same shall

be deemed to be closed.

List on 8.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4588/2020

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents-State.

Mr. C. N.Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

This Court on 5.4.2021 passed the following order:

"This court, vide order dated 5.4.2021, appointed Mr.

Surinder Maltu, Additional Director-cum-Joint Secretary
(Panchayati Raj) to investigate the matter and submit
his report.

In compliance to aforesaid order, Mr. Surinder Maltu has

filed his report, however the conclusions drawn by him
are not very explicit and clear in the inquiry report.
Therefore, we direct Mr. Surinder Maltu to give explicit

and clear conclusions within a period of two weeks.
List on 18.8.2021."

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record instructions dated 13.8.2021 accompanied by

conclusions of the inquiry report.

Learned counsel for the parties pray for and

granted one week's time to address the arguments.

List on 25.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 5379/2020

18.8.2021 Present: Petitioner in person.

.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for respondent No.2.

Costs of Rs.10,000/- stand paid to the petitioner.

the petitioner.

r to
Reply has been filed and a copy thereof has been supplied to

The petitioner prays for and is granted two weeks'

time to file rejoinder.

List on 2.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No.7113/2020

18.8.2021 Present: Ms. Kanta Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal
Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

It is rather surprising, if not shocked, that despite

the respondents being put to formal notice on 1.7.2019, reply,

for over a period of two years, has not been filed by them,

although the case was listed before this Court on 16.12.2020,

6.1.2021, 5.3.2021 and 26.3.2021 and on each occasion, the

respondents prayed for and were granted time to file reply.

In such circumstances, even though there is no

justification for granting further time to file reply, however as a

matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last opportunity,

subject to costs of Rs.10,000/-, to be paid to the petitioner,

four weeks' further time is granted to do the needful. The costs

initially shall be paid by the respondent-Department and

thereafter shall be recovered from the erring officials/officers,

whether serving or retired and report compliance to this effect

on 28.2.2022.

List on 15.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 29/2021

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

appellant.

Notice issued to the sole respondent is stated to be

awaited. However, being actual date, the same cannot be

awaited any further. Therefore, fresh notice be issued to the

respondent, returnable for 22.9.2021, on taking steps within

two days.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1369/2021

18.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dalip K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Bhim Singh, Advocate, vice counsel for the
respondents.

The record reveals that though the work for

reconditioning/replacement of 11 KV HT line with AB Cable

from K/ghat to V/ghat at 11 KV Sarahan Feeder (Near

Gurduwara) under Electrical Sub Division No-II, HPSEBL

Solan has been awarded on 25.7.2020, i.e. more than one year

back, yet the transmission line has not been shifted in terms of

the award. Therefore, let needful be done within one week

failing which respondent No.2-Managing Director, HPSEBL

shall personally remain present before this Court on the next

date of hearing.

List on 27.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
18.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3711/2021 along with CWP Nos.
2067/2019, 4342/2019, 4556/2020,
6322/2020, 3770/2021 & 3772/2021

.

16.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vijay Chauhdary, Mr. Anup K. Rattan & Mr.
Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocates, for the respective
petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Rahul, Advocate, vice Mr. Maan Singh,
Advocate, for respondent-H.P. State Pollution Control
Board.

Mr. Balram Sharma, ASGI, for Union of India.

CWP Nos. 3711/2021, 3770/2021 & 3772/2021

& 4556/2020, 6322/2020

The writ petitions are disposed of vide separate

order of the day.

CWP No. 2067/2019 & 4342/2019

De-linked. List on 6.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO No.6/2019

16.8.2021 Present: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

In the earlier part of the day, learned counsel for

the respondent had made grievance that the appellant is not

paying any amount towards maintenance charges. Confronted

with this, learned counsel for the appellant was granted some

time to obtain instructions.

Now, learned counsel for the appellant, on

instruction from his client, states that it is only for want of

bank account that the appellant is not paying the amount in

question.

Learned counsel for the respondent undertakes to

supply the bank account of her client during the course of the

day.

Let arrears of maintenance be transmitted to the

bank account by the appellant within one week.

List for consideration on 6.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
16.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO No. 22/2021

16.8.2021 Present: None for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, states that the

appellant has taken away the brief on the pretext of engaging

another counsel. His statement is taken on record.

There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant

despite ther matter having been called out repeatedly.

Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss

the appeal in default. Ordered accordingly.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

16.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2610/2021

13.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish

.

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to place on record additional

documents on or before the next date of hearing.

List on 26.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
13.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3928/2021

13.8.2021 Present: Mr. Aditya Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

to 3.

It appears that notice has not been issued to

respondent No.4, who is a necessary and proper party.

Therefore, issue notice to the aforesaid respondent in terms of

Order 5 Rule 9-A
CPC
, returnable before the next date of

hearing, on taking steps during the course of the day.

List on 20.8.2021, when complete records of the

DO Notes that have been placed on record, be produced by the

official respondents.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

13.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.1825/2019

13.8.2021 Present: Mr. B.C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,

.

Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1
and 2.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit
Jamwal, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

Learned counsel for respondent No.3-Corporation,

on instructions, states that
r cheques have been issued in

favour of the petitioners for first quarter. His statement is

taken on record.

Confronted with this, learned counsel for the

petitioners prays for and is granted four weeks' time to

ascertain this fact.

List on 17.9.2021. In the meanwhile, respondent

No.3-Corporation is directed to send proposal for financial

sanction, for every quarter, well in advance and not waiting till

the last date, to respondents No. 1 and 2.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
13.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.4471/2021

13.8.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1
to 3.

Though, the official respondents have put in

appearance yet it is respondent No.4, who would be ultimately

affected by the outcome of this petition. Therefore, issue notice

to the aforesaid respondent in terms of Order 5 Rule 9-A
CPC
,

returnable for 20.8.2021, on taking steps during the course of

the day.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

13.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3928/2021

13.8.2021 Present: Mr. Aditya Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

to 3.

It appears that notice has not been issued to

respondent No.4, who is a necessary and proper party.

Therefore, issue notice to the aforesaid respondent in terms of

Order 5 Rule 9-A
CPC
, returnable before the next date of

hearing, on taking steps during the course of the day.

List on 20.8.2021, when complete records of the

DO Notes that have been placed on record, be produced by the

official respondents.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

13.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4277/2021

12.8.2021 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1

to 3.

Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Mr.

The instant petition has been listed under the

caption "Speaking to the Minutes".

It appears Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, has

appeared on behalf of respondent No.4 on the date i.e.

9.8.2021 when arguments were heard and the judgment was

reserved in the instant case, however his presence was

inadvertently not marked in the zimini order dated 9.8.2021

and that is why his presence was also not marked in the

judgment, which was pronounced on 11.8.2021. Let the name

of Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, be reflected in the zimini

order dated 9.8.2021 so also the judgment dated 11.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
12.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CARB.A No. 6/2019

12.8.2021 Present: Mr. Deepak Bhasin, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, for the respondent.

CARAP No.1/2021

Mr. Raman Sethi, Advocate, states that the

rejoinder is ready and would be filed during the course of the

day. His statement is taken on record.

r to

CARAP No. 2/2021

The application is allowed as prayed for.

deposited amount be kept/treated as security till final decision
The

of the main petition. The application stands disposed of.

CARB.A. No. 6/2019

List on 19.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

12.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No.6380/2020

12.8.2021 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Advocate, for the respondent.

CWPOA No. 6380/2020

It appears that the learned erstwhile Tribunal had

kept this matter on its docket only on account of pendency of

CWP No.161/2019. However, now that the aforesaid petition

instructions.

r to
has been decided on 29.8.2019, let the petitioner obtain fresh

List on 13.8.2021.

CMP-T No. 219/2021

In view of the aforesaid order, the instant

application for early hearing of the main petition is rendered

infructuous and disposed of as such.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
12.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4386/2021

11.8.2021 Present: Mr. Kr. Virender Singh, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-
State.

CMP No. /2021

Be registered. The particulars of letter in question

are taken on record. Application stands disposed of.

CWP No. 4386/2021

List on 13.8.2021, when records leading to the

issuance of letter No. Secy./CM-17060/2017-VI-B-296121

dated 11.6.2021 be produced by the official respondents. Till

then, the parties are directed to maintain status quo.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
11.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

DSR No.1/2018 along with Cr.A. No.387/2018

9.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

.

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the appellant in
DSR No. 1/2018 and for the respondent in Cr. A. No.
387/2018.

Mr. Prince Chauhan, Advocate, for the
respondents in DSR No. 1/2018 and for the
appellants in Cr. A. No. 387/2018.

List before another Bench, of which both of us are

not members, at the pleasure of Hon'ble the Acting Chief

Justice.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

9.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4356/2020

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-

State.

Mr. N. K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.2
and 3.

Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 4
to 6.

Mr. J. S. Bhogal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Srishti
Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.7.

On 26.7.2021, this Court passed the following

order:

Respondents No. 4 to 6 have filed separate reply
wherein, in para 1 of the preliminary objections reads as
under:

That no fundamental or constitutional right whatsoever
of the petitioner has been infringed and as such the writ

petition is not maintainable. Notwithstanding, it is most
humbly submitted that the respondent MC had already

sanctioned MC Road From Gurucharan House near
Green House RA 0/0 to 0/050 ( SH:C/ o R/Wall at RD

0/0 to 0/025 ) in Ward No.3 vide letter dated
15.12.2018 ( Annexure R/41) and in case the directions
are issued to the respondent MC to execute the said
work, the problem being posed by the petitioner will be
automatically solved. So far as sewerage related issue is
concerned , in this regard all residents of the Hari
Cottage had already represented to the Commissioner of
the respondent MC on
23.07.2020 ( Annexure R/42 ) and no action in this
regard has been taken till date."

Confronted with this, learned Standing Counsel for
Municipal Corporation, prays for and is granted two
days' time to seek instructions.
List on 04.08.2021.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

2 Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocate, states that the

respondent-Municipal Corporation, Shimla is ready and willing

.

to execute the work in question and it is only because of the

hindrances created by the persons residing in the locality that

the work is not being executed.

3 In this view of the matter, we direct respondent-

Municipal Corporation to execute the work in question and in

case any person has any grievance, he/she is at liberty to

approach this Court for redressal of grievance(s). However,

under any circumstances, would there be no hindrance(s) in

the execution of the work. The Municipal Corporation is at

liberty to approach the Superintendent of Police, Shimla in

case the police assistance is required.

4 Needless to say that the execution of the work

would be undertaken after carrying out necessary demarcation

so that there is no damage or obstruction caused to the private

properties in question.

5 Since the work in question has commenced in the

year 2018, it is expected that the work shall be executed as

expeditiously as possible and in no event later than

31.12.2021.

For compliance to come up on 5.1.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

Judge
4.8.2021
(pankaj)

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4588/2020

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-
State.

Mr. C. N. Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

This court, vide order dated 5.4.2021, appointed

Mr. Surinder Maltu, Additional Director-cum-Joint Secretary

(Panchayati Raj) to investigate the matter and submit his

report. In compliance to aforesaid order, Mr.

Surinder Maltu has filed his report, however the conclusions

drawn by him are not very explicit and clear in the inquiry

report. Therefore, we direct Mr. Surinder Maltu to give explicit

and clear conclusions within a period of two weeks.

List on 18.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4741/2020

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-

State.

Even though the respondents have filed their reply,

however we are not at all satisfied with the contents thereof as

the respondents have not clearly stated as to why the petitioner

is being made rolling stone; even though at the same station.

Therefore, supplementary affidavit be filed by the respondents

explaining this position within four weeks

List on 1.9.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.193/2021

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advcoate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.12.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted one week's time to file reply on behalf of respondent

No.6. List on 11.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3681/2021

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents- State.

CWP No. 3681/2021

Learned Sr. Additional Advocate General has

placed on record certain instructions, however we are not at all

inclined to consider the instructions, as these are not

supported by an affidavit. Let a formal reply duly supported by

an affidavit be filed within one week. List on 11.8.2021.

CMP No. 7096/2021

Heard. The promotion to the post in question, if

any made, shall be abide by the final outcome of the writ

petition. Application stands disposed of

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3686/2021

4.8.2021 Present: Mr. Surender Saklani, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-

State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

private respondent has further been adjusted at GPS Baroti,

order dated 30.7.2021.

r to
Education Block, Sundernagar-I, District Mandi, H.P. vide

Confronted with this, learned Deputy Advocate

General prays for and is granted one week's time to obtain

instructions. List on 11.8.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
4.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3516/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Subhash Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-

State.

Mr. Surender Verma, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

On the request of learned counsel for the

r to

petitioner, list on 10.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4031/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file reply on behalf of respondents

No. 4 and 5.

List on 31.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4032/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dinesh K. Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted three weeks' time to file reply on behalf of respondents

No. 4 and 5.

List on 31.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4283/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

On the request of learned Deputy Advocate

General, list on 10.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4309/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 4
to 6.

Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent
No.8.

Admit. List for hearing on 24.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 4353/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Steps for service of respondent No.3 have not been

taken. The same be taken within two days. Thereafter, issue

notice to the aforesaid respondent returnable for 14.9.2021.

Rejoinder, if any, in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4705/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.1.

The rejoinder is stated to be filed on 30.7.2021.

However, the same is not on record. Learned counsel for the

petitioner to follow up with the registry.

List on 10.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4933/2020

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioners.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents- State.

Steps for the service of respondents No. 3 and 4

have not been taken. The same be taken within two day.

Thereafter, issue notice to the aforesaid respondents

returnable for 31.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
3.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1076/2021 a/w COPC No. 78/2021

3.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gautam

.

Sood, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Amit Singh Chandel, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent

No.3.

Mr. R. K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay K.
Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 10.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

3.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 2528/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 16.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4154/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Subham Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Admit. List for hearing on 4.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO No. 22/2021

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

states that the petitioner has assailed the order dated

16.6.2021 before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, whereby he was

directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2 lacs before the registry of

this Court and to continue to pay Rs.10,000/- per month to

the respondent.

Since there is no order of stay passed by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, the mere fact the appellant

may have filed an SLP cannot be a ground not to deposit the

amount in question.

In this view of the matter, we restrain the

Executive Engineer, HPPWD Barsar Division from releasing

salary of the petitioner till further orders.

List on 16.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 352/2018

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. T. S. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Ashwani Dhiman, Advocate, for respondents
No. 4 and 5.

Mr. Malay Kaushal, Advocate, for respondents No.
6 and 7.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 4.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 856/2018

2.8.2021 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record instructions dated 23.7.2021, however, the same are

not accompanied with copy of field report, which is stated to be

annexed as Annexure A-1. Needful be done before the next date

of hearing. A copy of the complete instructions be supplied to

the learned counsel for the petitioner during the course of the

day.

List on 4.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1558/2018

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Balwant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to obtain instructions.

List on 16.8.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1580/2019

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the

necessary rejoinder is ready, however the same could not be

filed for want of signatures of the petitioner. As prayed for, by

way of last opportunity, three weeks' further time is granted to

the petitioner to do the needful.

List on 23.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3953/2019 a/w CWPOA Nos. 2558, 3053, 3064 and

3568/2019

.

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr Vishwa Bhushan, Mr. Ajay

Chauhan, Mr. Rupinder Singh and Mr. Naresh
Verma, Advocates, for the respective petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate, states that the

rejoinder has been filed on 16.7.2021. However, the same is

not on record. Learned counsel to follow up with the registry.

List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 7944/2019

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Atul, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

On the request of learned vice counsel for the

petitioner, list on 9.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 17/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

None for the respondent.

It appears that even though, the respondent has

been served, however he has not chosen to appear before this

Court. The instant case is a matrimonial dispute, therefore, it

is incumbent upon this Court to make an endeavour for

amicable settlement. Therefore, let both the parties remain

present before this Court on the next date of hearing. The

respondent is directed to be served through the Deputy

Director, Animal Husbandry, Kangra, at Dharamshala, as the

respondent is stated to the working at the following address:-

Sunil Kumar, son of Sh. Dhani Ram,
Veterinary Pharmacist,

Vterrinary Hospital, Kangra,
Old Mission Road, Near IPH Office,

District Kangra, H.P.

List on 6.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

LPA No. 72/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, CGSC, for respondent No.4.

List along with LPA Nos. 30, 31 and 32/2020.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 1299/2020

2.8.2021 Present: None for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondents No. 4
and 5.

Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, states that he is no

longer counsel for the petitioner in this case as his client has

taken away the file. His statement is taken on record.

List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3709/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Naresh K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent
No.2.

Respondent No.2 is yet to file its reply. As a

matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last opportunity, one

week's time is granted to file the reply, failing which right to file

same shall be deemed to be closed.

List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 4210/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Admit. List for hearing after six weeks.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5407/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Romesh Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Bharat Barowalia, Advocate, for respondent

No.1.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.
4, 5 and 6.

Reply on behalf of appearing respondents, as

prayed for, be filed within four weeks.

List on 6.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 5494/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Devnder K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Reply on behalf of the respondents is stated to be

lying under objections. The same be removed before the next

date of hearing. Rejoinder be filed within four weeks.

List on 6.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 6108/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly pray for and

are granted one week's time to supply list of similar matters.

r to
List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 6285/2020

2.8.2021 Present: Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Despite ample opportunities having been granted

to file the reply, the respondents have failed to do so. As a

the respondents

matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last opportunity, one

week's further time is granted to file the reply, failing which all

shall personally appear before this Court

along with records on the next date of hearing.

List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
2.8.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPs No. 4042/2021 & 3905/2021

CWP No. 4042/2021

.

28.7.2021 Present: Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

CWP No. 3905/2021

Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,

Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. R.L. Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

Reply on behalf of respondent No.4 is stated to

have been filed in CWP No. 3905/2021, however the same is

not on record. Registry to trace and place the reply on record.

List on 4.8.2021, when records of CWP No.

2621/2020 be also made available for perusal of this Court.

Interim order(s) to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWPs No.3926 & 3797/2021

CWP No. 3926/2021

.

28.7.2021 Present: Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

CWP No. 3797/2021

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu

Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

It appears that somewhat identical issues have

already been considered and decided by learned Single Judge

of this court (Justice Vivek Singh Thakur). Therefore, it would

be appropriate if these cases are listed before the same Bench.

Registry is directed to place the matter before

Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice.

Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3928/2021

28.7.2021 Present: Mr. Aditya Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is

granted one week's time to file rejoinder. List on 4.8.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.3931/2021

28.7.2021 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and

is granted two weeks' time to file reply.

r to
List on 18.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No.4054/2021

28.7.2021 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. A.K. Vashista, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Advocate, prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply/produce records.

List on 11.8.2021. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
28.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3802/2021

27.7.2021 Present: Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-
State.

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed

on record instructions dated 22.7.2021. However, before

proceeding further on the basis of such instructions, let a copy

thereof be supplied to the learned counsel for the petitioner

during the course of the day.

List on 28.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

27.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4107/2021

27.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents.

(Through Video Conferencing)

CMP No. 8281/2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 4107/2021 & CMP No. 8282/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted two

weeks' time to file reply. List on 10.8.2021. In the meanwhile,

the respondents are restrained from effecting recovery from the

petitioner.

CMP No. 8283/2021

The application is disposed of with a direction to

the applicant to file English translation of documents in

question within two weeks.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
27.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3238/2019, 3466, 3467, 3468, 3905,
3908, 3911, 3913, 3914, 3915, 3921, 3922,
3927, 3932, 3933/2019, CWP No. 1423/2020 &

.

CWPOA No. 5998/2020

26.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
petitioner(s), in all the petitions, except CWP No.
1423/2020 & CWPOA No. 5998/2020 and for the
respondents- State in CWP No. 1423/2020 &

CWPOA No. 5998/2020.

Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandel, Mr. Naresh Kaul, Mr.
Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Mr.
Surinder Parkash Sharma, Mr. Devnder K.

Sharma, Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma and Mr.
Surender Verma, Advocates, for the respective
respondents.

Ms. Suman Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner in

CWP No. 1423/2020.

Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, vice Mr. Madan

Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner in CWPOA
No.5998/2020.

After arguing for sometime, Ms. Suman Thakur

and Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocates, pray for and are granted

an adjournment. List on 28.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3820/2021

26.7.2021 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondent No.8.

Notices issued for service of respondents No. 6 and

7 are stated to be awaited, however, being actual date, the

same cannot be awaited any further. Therefore, in the given

circumstances, we direct respondent No.8-Station House

Officer, Police Station Nangal Bhoor, District Pathankot,

Punjab to produce or cause production, in civil dress, of

respondents No. 6 and 7 before this Court on the next date of

hearing.

List on 9.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

26.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4074/2021

26.7.2021 Present: Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents No. 1
and 2.

(Through Video Conferencing)

CMP No. 8167/2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 4074/2021 & CMP No. 8168/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 and 2. Issue notice to respondents

No. 3 and 4 returnable for 6.9.2021, on taking steps within two

days. In the meanwhile, impugned order of transfer dated

23.7.2021 is ordered to be stayed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4054/2021

26.7.2021 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for respondents-State.

Mr. A. K. Vashshista, Advocate, for respondent
No.4.

(Through Video Conferencing)

CMP No. 8143/2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 4054/2021 & CMP No. 8144/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General and Mr. A. K. Vashishta, Advocate, appear

and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective

respondents. They pray for and are granted two days' time to

file reply. List on 28.7.2021. In the meanwhile, status quo be

maintained.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
26.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3096/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Sunil K. Kaundal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for respondents No.
1 and 2.

(Through Video Conferencing)

As prayed for, list on 26.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge
r (Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3338/2020 with CWPs No.2703 & 4239/2020

CWP No. 3338/2020

.

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Lokinder Pal Thakur, Sr. Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1.

Mr. K. D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,

Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

CWP No. 2703/2020

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, for the
petitioner.

Mr. Lokinder Pal Thakur, Sr. Panel Counsel, for

respondent No.1.

Mr. K. D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,
Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate, for respondent No.4.

CWP No. 4239/2020

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Aanadita

Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Lokinder Pal Thakur, Sr. Panel Counsel, for
respondent No.1.

Mr. K. D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,

Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Mr. Vishal Panwar, Advocate, for respondents No.4
and 5.

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 26.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3174/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

.

Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.

Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondent-
State.

Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the request of learned counsel for respondent

No.2, list on 26.7.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3713/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Ms. Salochana Rana, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Vivek Singh Attri & Mr. Abhinav Purohit,
Advocates, for respondent No.5.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the request of learned counsel for the

petitioner, list on 27.7.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 3902/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Sushant Vir Singh, Advocate, for respondent
No.3.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Heard in part. For continuity, list on 27.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4051/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents

No. 1 to 4.

(Through Video Conferencing)

CMP No. 8134/2021

Allowed and disposed of.

CWP No. 4051/2021 & CMP No. 8135/2021

Notice. Mr. Vinod Thakur, learned Additional

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on

behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4. Issue notice to respondents

No. 5 and 6 under
Order 5 Rule 9A CPC
, returnable for

4.8.2021, on taking steps within three days. In the meanwhile,

impugned transfer order dated 15.7.2021/20.7.2021

(Annexure P-1) qua the petitioner is ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 193/2021

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Mr. B.C.Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin Thakur,
Advocate, for respondent No.12.

(Through Video Conferencing)
It appears that the pleadings are still not complete

in this case. Needful be done within two weeks, failing which

no further time shall be granted to any of the parties to file

reply.

As regards rejoinder(s), prayer, if any, shall be

considered on the next date of hearing.

List on 4.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:38 :::CIS

CWP No. 4242/2020

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra,
Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu
Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr.
Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Mr. Rajinder Dogra, learned Sr. Addl. A.G. has

placed on record certain instructions, which are not at all

legible. Let legible copy thereof be submitted to the Court on

the next date of hearing.

Learned Sr. Addl. A.G., on instructions, states that

decision in
Narain Singh
's case (Annexure P-6) will be

implemented across the board without there being any

discrimination and even the petitioners, who have been left

out, shall be given benefit of the judgment in case they are

found to be eligible and their cases are covered by the aforesaid

judgment, well before the next date of hearing.

List on 16.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 1872/2020

24.7.2021 Present: Mr. Anil Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Sr. Addl. A.G. for the
respondents- State.

Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Reply filed on behalf of respondent No.2 in the

open Court is taken on record. Learned counsel for the

respondents jointly state that the issue in question is no longer

res integra in view of the judgment rendered by learned Single

Judge of this Court in CWPOA No.19/2019, titled as
Sudha

Batta vs. Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission
&

ors. Dated 2.11.2020.

Confronted with this, learned counsel for the

petitioner prays for and is granted two days' time to obtain

instructions.

List on 27.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
24.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 1606/2020

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, proxy counsel, for
respondent No.3 to 49.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and

is granted one week's time to obtain instructions. List on

27.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
20.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 1790/2020

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

List on 27.7.2021. Rejoinder, if any, in the

r to
meanwhile. Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

LPA No.46/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

appellants.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, proxy counsel, for
respondents No. 1 to 3.

Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, CGSC, for respondent No.4.

Mr. Anshul Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.7.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 27.7.2021.

r (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 1076/2021 a/w COPC No. 78/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr.
Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs.,
Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur,
Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, proxy counsel, for
respondent No.2.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh
K. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Supplementary affidavit on behalf of respondent

No.5 stands filed. List for consideration on 27.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2253/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Records produced. The same are ordered to be

retained. List on 24.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
r Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2493/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.
petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted one week's time to file reply. List on 27.7.2021.

Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2618/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Learned Deputy Advocate General prays for and is

granted two weeks' time to file reply.

List on 3.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2729/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Notices to respondents No. 6 and 7 could not be

issued due to COVID-19. Therefore, let the notices be issued to

the aforesaid respondents, returnable for 17.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2823/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Status report/instructions, in terms of previous

order, stand(s) filed. List on 24.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 3162/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, proxy counsel, for
respondent No.2.

(Through Video Conferencing)

order be complied with.

r to
As prayed for, list on 24.7.2021, when previous

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 3430/2021

20.7.2021 Present: Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate, proxy counsel, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-

State.

Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate, proxy counsel, for
respondent No.5.

Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate, for respondents
No. 12 to 14.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Reply on behalf of respondents-State is stated to

have been filed in the registry. The same be placed on record,

even if it is under objections. Reply on behalf of remaining

respondents be filed within three weeks.

List on 10.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

20.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr. Appeal No. 270/2011

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,

.

Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv

Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant.

Ms. Sheetal Vyas, Advocate, for the respondent.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 4.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr. Appeal No. 328/2011

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,

.

Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv

Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant.

Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 4.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

ITA No. 10/2015

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Diwan

.

Negi, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Vishal Mohan, Advocate, for the respondent.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 4.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
r Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

Judge
19.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

LPA Nos. 122 & 123/2008

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. G. D. Verma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. B. C.

.
Verma, Advocate, for the appellant(s).

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-
State.

Mr. Arjun Lal, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4
and 5(a) to (f).

(Through Video Conferencing)

Arguments heard. Judgment reserved.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 3884/2021

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,

.

Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv

Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and
Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. For the petitioners.

(Through Video Conferencing)

By medium of this petition, the petitioners-State

have sought to assail the award that was passed by the learned

Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Kangra, at

Dharamshala, way back on 20.12.2017.

Even though, the petitioners-State have tried to

justify their inaction in not filing the petition within a

reasonable time in para 15 thereof, however, we are not at all

satisfied with the averments contained in para 15. The

petitioners-State have only tried to justify passing of the file

from one desk/department to another. Therefore, the instant

petition cannot be entertained.

Learned Advocate General prays for and is granted

four weeks' time to file a supplementary affidavit.

List on 16.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 856/2018

19.7.2021 Present: Mr. G. C. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Meera

.

Devi, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Vikas Rathore, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv
Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and

Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-
State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

As per status report, dated, 9.11.2020, work of

laying down pipes for supply of potable water has been

completed and even testing of the line was done on

6.11.2020. It is also not in dispute that the petitioner has also

been provided with water connection. However, learned

counsel for the petitioner would argue that even though the

pipeline had been laid, but frequency of water is yet erratic and

for many days, there is no supply at all. More over, even water

tank that was constructed is leaking.

Let learned Advocate General obtain instructions

on the next date of hearing.

List on 26.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
19.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No.1002 of 2020 a/w CWPs N0.814,928,1031
to 1036 of 2020, 1049 to 1051 of 2020, 1069 to
1073 of 2020, 1076, 1077, 1081, 1090,

.

1156,1171,1172 and 1174 of 2020, 1183, 1184,

1204, 1234, 1239, 1267 to 1269 of 2020, 1316,
1317, 1321, 1392, 2078, 2150, 2153, 2176, 2177,
2197,2198, 2698, 3858, 3913,
4907,4956,4957,4967,5004,5017,5018,5022,5023,

5036,5040,5042,5043,5052 to 5055 of 2020, 5446,
5468, 5564, 5832 of 2020 and 3059 of 2021.
12.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Mr. Rakesh K. Dogra,
Mr.J.L.Bhardwaj, Mr. Vinay Sharma, Mr. Diwakar
Dev Sharma, Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Mr. Vishwa

Bhushan, Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Ms. Megha Kapoor
Gautam, Mr. Goldy Kumar, Mr. Surender Verma,
Mr. Gambhir 0Singh, Mr. Mukul Sood, Ms.
Suchitra Sen, Advocates, for the respective
petitioner(s).

Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate
General,

for the respondent-State.
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Mr. Dalip
K. Sharma and Mr. Ajay Kumar Dhiman,
Advocates

for the respective respondent(s).
Mr. B. C. Negi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nitin
Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No.3 and 4 in
CWPs No. 2078/2020, 2153/2020 & 2176/2020

(Through Video Conferencing)

CWPs No. 2078/2020, 2153/2020 & 2176/2020

De-listed. List on 14.7.2021.

CWP No.1002 of 2020 a/w CWPs N0.814,928,1031
to 1036 of 2020, 1049 to 1051 of 2020, 1069 to
1073 of 2020, 1076, 1077, 1081, 1090,
1156,1171,1172 and 1174 of 2020, 1183, 1184,
1204, 1234, 1239, 1267 to 1269 of 2020, 1316,
1317, 1321, 1392, 2150, 2177,
2197,2198,2698,3858,3913,4907,4956,4957,4967,
5004,5017,5018,5022,5023,5036,5040,5042,5043,
5052 to 5055 of 2020, 5446, 5468, 5564, 5832 of
2020 and 3059 of 2021.

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 14.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Judge
12.7.2021
(pankaj)

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2982/2019

12.7.2021 Present: Ms. Madhurika Verma, Advocate, for the

.

petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder

Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Admit. List for hearing on 9.8.2021. Rejoinder, if

any, in the meanwhile.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
r Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

12.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

FAO (FC) No. 25/2021

12.7.2021 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.

(Through Video Conferencing)

The parties are present in person and they are not

averse in making an endeavour to settle the matter amicably.

As jointly prayed for, Mr. S.C. Sharma, learned

Senior Advocate and a Trained Mediator of this Court is

appointed as Mediator to mediate between the parties. The

parties to appear before the learned Mediator at 1.30 P.M.

today i.e. 12.7.2021 at Mediation Centre, H.P. High Court.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

12.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 2159/2020

7.7.2021 Present: Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-State.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent
No.6.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Heard. We are prima facie of the considered view

that majority of these litigations, among the industrialists and

truck operators, are frequently coming up before this Court

only on account of non-fixation of freight charges.

One similar issue came up before this Court in

CWPs No. 777/2020 and 5422/2020, wherein, on the

directions of this Court, the Deputy Commissioner, Solan,

after inviting all the stake holders, fixed the freight charges,

that too with consent of all the stake holders.

Therefore, in the given facts and circumstances of

the case, we deem it proper to direct the Deputy

Commissioner, Una, to undertake similar exercise, after

associating all the stake holders, within eights weeks from

today. Ordered accordingly.

We make it absolutely clear that each of the stake

holders shall be free to voice his grievance(s) including fixation

of quota of trucks, if any.

List on 1.9.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Judge
7.7.2021
(pankaj)

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

FAO No. 22/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

(Through Video Conferencing)

A sum of Rs. 10,000/- has been deposited,

however remaining amount of Rs. 2 lacs has not been

deposited.

It is noticed that the period to comply with the

order dated 16.6.2021 has not elapsed, therefore, list for

consideration on the date already fixed.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge

6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 136/2020

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,

Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondents-State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Despite the respondents having been put to notice

as far as back on 31.8.2016, they have failed to file reply.

As a matter of sheer indulgence and by way of last

opportunity, four weeks' further time is granted to do the

needful, failing which all the respondents shall appear before

this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 3.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021

(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWPOA No. 130/2020

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Parveen Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,

Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Admit. List for hearing on 13.7.2021.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

FAO No. 25/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondent.

.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Notice. Mr. P. P. Chauhan, Advocate, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.

It is rather shocking to note that even though the

petition filed by the respondent herein was for restitution of

conjugal rights and even the judgment that was rendered by

the learned court below is to this effect.

However, perusal of the decree accompanying the

judgment, would show that the petition has been accepted and

the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by a

decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty, which obviously is

not in accordance with either prayer made in the petition or

findings rendered by the learned court below in the judgment

itself.

It is more than settled that the decree follows the

judgment. Therefore, let notice be issued to the official/officer,

who has drawn the decree in question to explain his conduct.

Since the instant appeal emanates out of a

matrimonial discord, therefore, let both the parties appear

before this Court on the next date of hearing.

List on 12.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

(pankaj)

.

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

FAO No. 27/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate, for the
appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for respondent No.1.

(Through Video Conferencing)

It appears that It is the Secretary, Gram

Panchayat Basi Jhaniara, that has been sued as respondent

No.1 instead of Gram Panchayat.

rLearned counsel for the appellant prays for and is

granted permission to carry out table amendment(s) in the

appeal.

Issue notice to respondent No.1. Mr. Vinod

Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and

waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Call for

the records.

Let two copies of the appeal be supplied to the

office of Advocate General during the course of the day.

Registry to reflect name of Advocate General in the cause list

henceforth.

List on 3.8.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWP No. 3338/2020

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Lokinder Pal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for

respondent No.1.

Mr. K. D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Het Ram,
Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 13.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr.MP(M) No. 666/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.

.

A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder

Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant/applicant.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Cr.MP(M) No. 666/2021

The appeal has been filed within the prescribed

period of limitation, therefore, the instant application seeking

such.

r to
condonation of delay is clearly mis-conceived and dismissed as

Cr.MP(M) No. 665/2021

Heard. Leave to appeal granted.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. A. No. /2021

Admit. Call for the records.

Bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one

local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

executing officer be furnished by each of the respondents-

accused undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and

when directed and to receive the sentence which may be

imposed on the conclusion of the appeal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr.MP(M) No. 668/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.

.

A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder

Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant/applicant.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Cr.MP(M) No. 668/2021

Heard. Leave to appeal granted.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. A. No. /2021

Admit. Call for the records.

Bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one

local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

executing officer be furnished by the respondent-accused

undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when

directed and to receive the sentence which may be imposed on

the conclusion of the appeal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr.MP(M) No. 1044/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.

.

A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder

Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant/applicant.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Cr.MP(M) No. 1044/2021

Heard. Leave to appeal granted.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. A. No. /2021

Admit. Call for the records.

Bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one

local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

executing officer be furnished by the respondent-accused

undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when

directed and to receive the sentence which may be imposed on

the conclusion of the appeal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr.MP(M) No. 1047/2021

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.

.

A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder

Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the appellant/applicant.

(Through Video Conferencing)

Cr.MP(M) No. 1047/2021

Heard. Leave to appeal granted.

Application stands disposed of.

Cr. A. No. /2021

Admit. Call for the records.

Bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one

local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the

executing officer be furnished by each of the respondents-ac

cused undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when

directed and to receive the sentence which may be imposed on

the conclusion of the appeal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Cr. A. No. 366/2015

6.7.2021 Present: Mr. N. S. Chandel, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vinod
Gupta, Advocate, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

(Through Video Conferencing)

On the joint request of learned counsel for the

parties, list on 13.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
6.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

CWPs No. 777, 2159 & 5422/2020
5.7.2021 Present: Mr. K. D. Shreedhar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shreya
Chauhan, Advocate, Mr. Vikrant Thakur,

.

Advocates, for the respective petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur,
Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Minhans, Addl.
A.Gs., Mr. J. S. Guleria and Mr. Bhupinder
Thakur, Dy.A.Gs. for the respondents-State.

Mr. R. K. Gautam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Megha
Kapoor Gautam, for respondents No. 5 and 6 in
CWP No. 777/2020 and for respondent No.6 in CWP No.
5422/2020.

Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent

No.6 in CWP No. 2159/2020.

Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.7
in CWP No. 5422/2020.

(Through Video Conferencing)

CWP Nos. 777 & 5422/2020

Minutes of the meeting handed over by the learned

Advocate General are ordered to be taken on record.

Admit.

Plying of trucks in question shall strictly abide by

the settlement arrived at with the authorities, i.e.

Deputy Commission Solan as also in compliance to the

directions passed by this Court from time to time on the

subject.

CWP No. 2159/2020

De-linked. List for consideration on 7.7.2021.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Judge

(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge
5.7.2021
(pankaj)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Court on its own motion Vs. State of H.P and ors.

CWPIL No.53 of 2018

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Akash Thakur, Advocate vice Ms. Vandana
Misra, Advocate, as amicus curiae.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents No.1 to
5-State.

Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for respondent No.6.

r to
Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer prays for and is

granted one week's time to file fresh status report.

List on 16.05.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
9.5.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

State of H.P and Ors. Vs. Hoshiar Singh

CWP No.2944 of 2018

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,
Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Kavita
Kajal, Advocate, for the respondent.

List on 11.05.2023.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)

Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)

Judge
9.5.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

The Deoli Coop. Agri Service Society Ltd. Vs.
State of H.P. & Ors.
a/w connected matters.

.

CWP No.2140 of 2020 a/w CWP No.6932 of

2022 & CWP No.1595 of 2023.

CWP No.2140 of 2020

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita

Kajal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,
Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents/State.

CWP No.6932 of 2022

Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents/State.

Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

CWP No.1595 of 2023

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kavita
Kajal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents/State.

List on 10.05.2023.

Interim order to continue.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Devesh Chandel Vs. Union of India & Others
.

CWP No.835 of 2020

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No.1.

Mr. Akash Thakur, Advocate vice, Ms. Vandana
Misra, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4.

Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate for respondent
No.5.

List for consideration on 16.05.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge

9.5.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Smt. Anupam Salaria Vs. State of H.P. & Ors
.

CWP No.652 of 2020

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate vice, Mr. Sat Prakash,
Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents-State.

Admit.

r to (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Pranav Kant Vs. State of H.P. & Ors
.

CWP No.2482 of 2019

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Rajesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents No.1 to 8 -
State.

Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sohail

Khan, Advocate, for respondent No.9.

Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate appearing on behalf of

respondent No.9 states that reply on behalf of said respondent

has been filed.

Rejoinder to the reply(ies) be filed within four

weeks

List on 28.06.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023
(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

Kamlo Devi Vs. State of H.P. & Ors
.

CWP No.3492 of 2022

.

9.5.2023 Present: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,
Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat

Chauhan, Law Officer, for the respondents-State.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays

for and is granted three weeks' time to file fresh reply.

List
r on 30.05.2023. In the meanwhile,

respondents are directed to consider the candidature of the

petitioner only if she is eligible and qualifies.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023

(
mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

District Bar Association Solan Vs. State of H.P. & Ors
.

CWP No.1134 of 2019

.

9.5.2023 Present: Mr. P.S. Goverdhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.
Rakesh Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I.N. Mehta,

Sr. Additional Advocate General and Mr.Rajat
Chauhan, Law Officer, for respondents No.1, 3 &
4-State.

Mr. Rajender Thakur, Central Government

Counsel, for respondent No.2-UOI.

Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.5.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General has

placed on record status report indicating therein that the

Committee so constituted by the Collector-cum-SDM, Solan

visited the spot on 08.05.2023 and submitted the preliminary

report wherein they recommended for the acquisition of the

proposed land for construction and expansion of Judicial Court

Complex, Solan, District Solan in larger public interest. We

deem it appropriate to direct the State to acquire the land in

question by issuing the necessary notification under
Section 11

of the Land Acquistion Act within a period of one week from

today.

For compliance to come up on 17.05.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
Acting Chief Justice

(Virender Singh)
Judge
9.5.2023
(mamta)

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS

The contemnors are present in person and have accepted thier mistake by offering an

unconditional, unqualified and sincere apology for whatever has happened after issuance of

.

notice by this Court. The apology to tendered is accepted. Therefore, we deem it proper to

drop the instant proceedings. Ordered accordingly. However, the respondents are directed to

be careful in future especially while dealing with court matters.

r to

::: Downloaded on - 15/05/2023 20:39:39 :::CIS