Jharkhand High Court

Uday Singh vs The State Of Jharkhand ... Opposite ... on 9 March, 2022

Author:
Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench:
Anil Kumar Choudhary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1651 of 2022

Uday Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Maltiyar ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
Domchanch P.S. Case No. 29 of 2021 registered under
Sections 3
/
of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the
owner of motorcycle in which explosion took place and causing
damage to the batteries of the motorcycle as well. It is then
submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and
those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further
submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though due to
printing error, in paragraph 10 of the of the anticipatory bail
application, it has been mentioned that the petitioner has "on"
criminal antecedent but in fact, it has been intended in paragraph
10 of the of the anticipatory bail application that the petitioner has
no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted by learned counsel
for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case
on the basis of suspicion that he was carrying explosive substance
in his motorcycle. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready
to co-operate with the investigationof the case and also undertakes
to pay Rs. 1,00,000/-to the informantwithout prejudice to his
defence, subject to final decision in the casehence, the petitioner be
given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 1,00,000/- by
way of demand draft drawn in favour of informant without
prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the case and on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned JMFC, Koderma in connection with
Domchanch P.S. Case No. 29 of 2021 subject to the condition that
the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and
will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by
him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card
at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not
to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along
with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the
petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the
informant and release the demand draft in his favour on proper
identification forthwith.
In case the petitioner deposits the aforesaid demand draft,
learned court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the
same at the time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1661 of 2022

Mahadeb Das ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. D.C.Mishra ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. B.N. Ojha ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Bagdehari P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021 registered under
Sections
/
of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is
involved in transportation of illegally excavated coal on his
motorcycle. It is then submitted that the allegations against the
petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and
omnibus in nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for
the petitioners that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as
mentioned in paragraph 14 of the anticipatory bail application. It is
next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the
investigationof the case and also undertakesto furnish sufficient
security including cash security, hence, the petitioners be given the
privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory
bail of the petitioner.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 2000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Jamtara in connection with
Bagdehari P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021 subject to the condition that the
petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will
appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him
and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at
the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to
change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with
the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1664 of 2022

Brajesh @ Brajesh Kumar Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand &Anr. ... Opposite Parties

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. IndrajitSinha ,Adv.
For the State : Ms. Kumari Rashmi ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Adityapur P.S.
Case No.292 of 2021 instituted under
Sections 406
,
,
,
,

120B
of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court
for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in
criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, have taken
Rs.1,63,500/- for a flat but did not hand over the said flat to its
purchaser. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner
is false. It is further submitted that there is inordinate delay in
institution of the complaint which upon being forwarded to police
under
Section 156 (3)
Cr.P.C., this case has been registered and no
specific role has been attributed to the petitioner. It is next
submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only
because he is the partner of M/s City Residency India Pvt. Ltd. It
is also submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically a
civil dispute. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and
willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case and
undertakes to pay Rs.1,63,500/- without prejudice to his defence in
this case to the informant of this case subject to final decision of the
caseand co-accused with similar allegations has already been
granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated
05.01.2022 passed in ABA no. 9833 of 2021, hence, it is submitted
that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs.1,63,500/- by
way of demand draft drawn in favour of informantwithout
prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the case and on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned CJM, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur
P.S. Case No.292 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner
will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will appear
before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will
submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of
surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change
mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other
conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the
petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the
informant and release the demand draft in his favour on proper
identification forthwith.
In case the petitioner deposits the aforesaid demand draft ,
learned court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the
same at the time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1671 of 2022

Bipad Ghoroi ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. D.C. Mishra ,Adv.
For the State : Ms. NikiSinha ,Spl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
Bagdehari P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021 registered under
Sections 414
/
of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is
involved in transportation of illegally excavated coal. It is then
submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and
those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is further
submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioner
has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the
anticipatory bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner
is ready to co-operate with the investigationof the case and also
undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security,
hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Spl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of
the petitioner.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 2000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Jamtara in connection with
Bagdehari P.S. Case No. 06 of 2021 subject to the condition that the
petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will
appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him
and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at
the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to
change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with
the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1680 of 2022

Amarnath @ Amarnath Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Adv.
For the State : Ms. NehalaSharmin, ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
After some arguments, learned senior counsel
appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of the court to
withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is
dismissed as withdrawn.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1699 of 2022

Suresh Narayan Das ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Madan Prasad ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. N.K. Gaunjhu ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitionerhas moved this Court
for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
Tandwa P.S. Case No. 150 of 2018 registered under
Sections 147
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along
with co-accused persons, under the banner of United Coal Workers
Union after forming unlawful assembly, entered forcibly in the
production area of Amarpali Project and stopped the production
and loading work causing loss to the tune of Rs. 4,50,00,000/- to
Magadh Amarpali Project. It is then submitted that the allegations
against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general
and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioneris
ready to co-operate with the investigationof the case and also
undertakes to deposit Rs. 50,000/- with the Central Coalfields
Limited, Chatra without prejudice to his defence, subject to final
decision in the caseand co-accused with similar allegations have
already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this court
vide order dated 03.08.2021 passed in ABA no. 418 of 2019, hence,
the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory
bail of the petitioner.
Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitioner shall be released on bail on showing the proof of
depositing Rs. 50,000/- with the Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra
without prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the
case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned CJM, Chatra in connection with Tandwa P.S.
Case No. 150 of 2018 subject to the condition that the petitioner
will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear
before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and
will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the
time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to
change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with
the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case the petitioner depositsthe demand draft of Rs.
50,000/- with the Central Coalfields Limited, Chatra, learned court
below will pass an appropriate order regarding the same at the
time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1704 of 2022

Ganesh Gorai ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand &Anr. ... Opposite Parties

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Chandra ,Adv.
For the State : Ms. Lily Sahay,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 70 of 2021 registered under
Sections
498A
of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 3
/
of D.P.Act.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the
petitioner being the husband, treated the opposite party no. 2 with
cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is then submitted
that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those
allegations are general and omnibus in nature, hence, the petitioner
be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to implead the
informant as opposite party no. 2.
Prayer is allowed.
The petitioner is directed to incorporate the name of
the informant as opposite party no. 2 within a week.
Let notice be issued to Opposite Party No. 2. The
petitioner is directed to file requisites of notice through both
processes i.e. under registered post with A/D as well as through
ordinary process within two weeks, failing which, this anticipatory
bail application shall stand dismissed without further reference to
the Bench.
List this case on 10.05.2022.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as
discussed above, I am inclined to pass an interim order of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner provisionally till 10.05.2022. In
case of the petitioner being arrested by the police on or before
10.05.2022, the petitioner shall be released on bail provisionally on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the officer concernedin connection with
GovindpurP.S. Case No. 70 of 2021 subject to the conditionslaid
down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 1466 of 2022

1.
Rohit Mandal

2. Raja Mandal

3. Haval Mandal

4. Jayanti Mandal

5. Kalu Mandal ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. YasirArafat ,Adv.

For the State : Mr. V. Roy ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioners personally

undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter
within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioners the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter
are ignored for the present.

Apprehending their arrest, the petitionershave moved this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pakur
(M) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2020 registered under
Sections 146
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code,
Section 2A (iii)
of
Epidemic Diseases Act and
Section 51 (a)
of Disaster Management Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that
the allegations against the petitioners is that they were members of an
unlawful assembly being armed with deadly weapon and in prosecution
of common object of the assembly, attacked the medical team which had
gone to the village of the informant for spraying hypo chloride to
prevent spreading of COVID-19 pandemic. It is then submitted that the
allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that
the petitionersare ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case
and also ready and willing to deposit Rs. 50,000/- jointly with the Deputy
Commissioner, Pakur without prejudice to his defence, subject to final
decision in the case and they undertake not to cause any hindrance to any
public servant in any manner during pendency of the casehence, the
petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of
the petitioners.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am
inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of
four months from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released
on bail on showing the proof of depositingRs. 50,000/- jointly with the
Deputy Commissioner, Pakur without prejudice to his defence, subject to
final decision in the case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pakur in connection with
Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2020 subject to the condition that the
petitioners will not cause any hindrance to any public servant in any
manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the
Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer
as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and
photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below
with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency
of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2)
Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioners,
learned court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and release
the demand draft in his favour on proper identification forthwith.

In case the petitioners deposit the aforesaid amount , learned court
below will pass an appropriate order regarding the same at the time of
conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1596 of 2022

Gaush Alam @ Arbaj ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. JitendraPandey ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner personally

undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitionerthe defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Giridih (Town) P.S. Case No. 229 of 2021registered under

Sections 414
/
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was
assisting the co-accused Md. Sartaj in commission of theft of mobile
phones from the innocent persons and in selling those stolen mobile
phone. It is then submitted that the allegations against the
petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and
omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner isready
to co-operate with the investigationof the case and also undertakes
to furnish sufficient security including cash security of ₹ 50,000/-
hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing ₹ 50,000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of₹ 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned CJM, Giridih in connection with Giridih
(Town) P.S. Case No. 229 of 2021 subject to the condition that the
petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will
appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him
and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at
the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to
change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with
the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1640 of 2022

Kinshu Kumar Singh @ Krishu Singh ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Thakur ,Adv.
For the State : Ms. VandanaBharti,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to
remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two
weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Chourparan P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020 registered under

Sections 414
/
of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3/4, 4A, 5, 12,
13 of JBAPS Act and 11
D of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was
involved in transportation of bovine animals for slaughtering them
illegally. It is then submitted that the allegations against the
petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and
omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner isready to
co-operate with the investigationof the case and also undertakes to
furnish sufficient security including cash securityhence, the
petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 40,000/- as cash
security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Hazaribag in connection with
Chourparan P.S. Case No. 144 of 2020 subject to the condition that
the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and
will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by
him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card
at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not
to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along
with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1642 of 2022

Chandan Gupta ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand &Anr. ... Opposite Parties

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. NaziaPerween ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. S.K. Sinha ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application as
the petitioner has been arrested.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is
dismissed as withdrawn.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1644 of 2022

Shashikant Mishra ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand &Anr. ... Opposite Parties

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. V.K. Trivedi ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto ,Addl. P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. S.B. Haque, Adv.
Ms. Sharda Kumari, Adv.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner personally

undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Sitaramdera P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021 registered under

Sections 498A
,
,
,
, of the Indian Penal Code and
Section
/
of D.P.Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being
the husband, treated the informant-opposite party no. 2 with
cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is next submitted
that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those
allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted
that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigationof
the case and he undertakes to pay Rs. 10,00,000/- to the opposite
party no. 2 as ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to
his defence hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of
anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,00,000/- by
way of demand draft drawn in favour of the opposite party no. 2as
ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to his defence
and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Jamshedpur in connection with
Sitaramdera P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021 subject to the condition that
the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and
will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by
him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card
at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not
to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along
with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the
petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the
opposite party no. 2and release the demand draft in her favour on
proper identification forthwith and if the said amount is deposited
by the petitioner, the same will be adjusted towards maintenance in
any proceeding between the parties in future or the final settlement,
if any, takes place between the parties.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1645 of 2022

Samir Kuraishi @ Md. Sameer ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amitesh Kr. Geasen ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. Shree PrakashJha ,Addl. P.P.
For the informant : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Adv.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner personally

undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019 registered under

Sections 341
,
,
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in
furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons,
attempted to commit murder of the members of the informant
party. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner
are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in
nature. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
and learned counsel for the informant that the parties have entered
into settlement and the informant does not to want to proceed with
the case and because of some misunderstanding, this case was
instituted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the
petitioner isready to co-operate with the investigation of the
casehence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Hazaribag in
connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019 subject to the
condition that the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of
the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and
when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and
photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court
below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the
pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down
under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1669 of 2022

Md. Rabbani Ansari ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. AlkaKumari ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. Shree PrakashJha ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2021 registered under

Sections 287
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in
furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons,
committed culpable homicide not amounting to murder by
switching on the crusher machine while the deceased Dilwa
Kunwar was working in the same. It is then submitted that the
allegations against the petitioner are all false and he had no
deliberate intention of causing any homicide of the deceased. It is
next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the
investigationof the case and also undertakes to pay Rs. 2,00,000/-to
the informantwithout prejudice to his defence, subject to final
decision in the casehence, the petitioner be given the privilege of
anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- by
way of demand draft drawn in favour of informantwithout
prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the case and on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned JMFC, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection
with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 103 of 2021 subject to the condition
that the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case
and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed
by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar
card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking
not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along
with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner,
learned court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and
release the demand draft in his favour on proper identification
forthwithwith the condition that the informant will keep the
amount in fixed deposit in name of daughter and son of the
deceased for a period of at least five years in any nationalized bank
with auto renewal clause with a further direction to the informant
that he will not withdraw the said amount till the minor children of
the deceased attains the majority.

In case the petitioner deposits the aforesaid demand draft ,
learned court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the
same at the time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1695 of 2022

Reyaz Ansari @ Riyaz Ansari ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratik Sen ,Adv.
For the State : Ms. NehalaSharmin, ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with PatratuP.S. Case No. 191 of 2021 registered under
Sections
,
,
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has
committed robbery of ₹ 75,000/- and demanded extortion and he is
having criminal antecedents. It is then submitted that the
allegations against the petitioner are all false and because of dispute
between the petitioner and the informant, this false case has been
foisted against the petitioner. It is further submitted that for the
selfsame occurrence, the wife of the petitioner has also instituted
compliant case no. 744 of 2021 against the informant and others. It
is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a
proceeding under
Section 107
Cr.P.C. is also going between the
parties and in this respect, learned counsel for the petitioner draws
attention of the court to page 23 (Annexure 3) of the brief, vide case
no. 33 of 2022 in the court of Sub Divisional Magistrate, Ramgarh.
It is next submitted that the petitioner isready to co-operate with
the investigationof the case and also undertakes to pay Rs.
1,00,000/-to the informant without prejudice to his defence, subject
to final decision in the case and undertakes not to go to or near the
house of the informant nor will annoy or disturb the informant or
his family members in any manner during pendency of the
casehence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 1,00,000/- by
way of demand draft drawn in favour of informant without
prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the case and on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned CJM, Ramgarh in connection with Patratu P.S.
Case No. 191 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner will
not go to or near the house of the informant nor will annoy or
disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during
pendency of the case and will co-operate with theInvestigation of
the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and
when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and
photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court
below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the
pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down
under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the
petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the
informant and release the demand draft in his favour on proper
identification forthwith.

In case the petitioner deposits the aforesaid demand draft ,
learned court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the
same at the time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1703 of 2022

Shankar Kumar Yadav ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. B.N. Ojha ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with NirsaP.S. Case No. 145 of 2021 registered under
Sections 413
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code,
Section 30
of Coal Mines
(Nationalization) Act and
Section 4
/
of MMDR Act, 1957.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the
owner of the motorcycle which was found at the place of
occurrence- Sankat Mochan Coke Oven plant, where 33 tons of
illegal extracted coal was stored. It is then submitted that the
allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner is a
milkman and he had come to the place of occurrence plant of the
co-accused by his bike and incidentally at that time, the police
raided the premises but the petitioner has nothing to do with the
said Sankat Mochan Coke Oven plant or for that matter the seized
coal from the said plant.It is further submitted by learned counsel
for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as
mentioned in paragraph 20 of the anticipatory bail application. It is
next submitted that the petitioner isready to co-operate with the
investigationof the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient
security including cash security hence, the petitioner be given the
privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 2000/- as cash
securityand on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty
Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned JM, Dhanbad in connection with Nirsa P.S.
Case No. 145 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner will
co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will appear before
the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will
submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of
surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change
mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other
conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1641 of 2022

Nand Kumar Jha ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. PandeyNeerajRai ,Adv.
For the State : Mr. Devesh Krishna S.C. Mines (III)

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes
to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two
weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter
are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this
Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with
Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2009 registered under
Sections 419
,
,
,
,
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the
allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner while posted as
Senior manager in Central Bank of India, disbursed loan to the co-
accused Arun Kedia of Rs. 25,00,000/- upon mortgaging of property of
the informant- Udit Ram by mentioning his name as Wadit Ram in the
loan documents. It is then submitted that the allegations against the
petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in
nature. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that
the petitioner has all along co-operated with the investigation of the case
and charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case and the police
did not feel it necessary to arrest the petitioner during the investigation of
the caseand in the meanwhile, title documents of the informant has been
released in favour of the petitioner by Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi. It
is next submitted that the petitioner isan old persons of 70 years and he is
suffering from several complications, for which he is under treatment at
AIIMS, New Delhi and he is ready to co-operate with the trial of the case.
It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to pay Rs. 2,00,000/-
to the informantwithout prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision
in the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the
petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am
inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence,
in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six
weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail
on depositing Rs. 2,00,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of
informantwithout prejudice to his defence, subject to final decision in the
case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned J.M., Ranchi in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No. 152 of
2009 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the
trial of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section
438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner,
learned court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and release
the demand draft in his favour on proper identification forthwith.

In case the petitioner deposits the aforesaid demand draft , learned
court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the same at the time
of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 1643 of 2022

Sanjay Chaudhary ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party

Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner : Mr. PratyushKumar ,Adv.
Mr. Prashant Kumar Shrivastava, Adv.
Ms. Archana Kumari, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto ,Addl. P.P.

02 / 09.03.2022 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally
undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter within two weeks.

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned
counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp
Reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved
this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection
with Golmuri P.S. Case No. 119 of 2019 registered under
Sections
,
of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being
the Managing Director of M/s Anant Consultant Services, Noida
organized a camp for employment to various posts, for which, 168
candidate were selected and he took Rs. 2,000/- per candidate for
the medical test but it is alleged that out of 168 candidates, 164
candidates, in respect of whom, the petitioner took money for
medical tests, in fact, did not undergothe medial test and they could
not even be traced. It is then submitted that the allegations against
the petitioner are all false and the job of M/s Anant Consultant
Services is to provide consultancy services and guide the
candidates as middleman for employment and in fact, the medical
examination of the candidates had been done. It is next submitted
that the petitioneris ready to co-operate with the investigationof the
case and also undertakes to deposit Rs. 3,36,000/-with the Deputy
Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur without prejudice
to his defence, subject to final decision in the casehence, the
petitionerbe given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail
of the petitioner.

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I
am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the
petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender
within a period of four months from the date of this order, the
petitionershall be released on bail on showing the proof of
depositing Rs. 3,36,000/- with the Deputy Commissioner, East
Singhbhum at Jamshedpur without prejudice to his defence, subject
to final decision in the case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, East
Singhbhum, at Jamshedpur in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case
No. 119 of 2019 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-
operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the
Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit
mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of
surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change
mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other
conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
In case the petitioner depositsthe aforesaid amount, learned
court below will pass an appropriate order regarding the same at the
time of conclusion of trial.

(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-