Document date: 00/00/0000

## Page 1

File #:

662-1110395

Serial Scope:

569 THru 6000

Released under the John

*• Kenned!

issassination Record

Collection Act of 1992

444 USC 2107 Notel.

Case#: NW 55029 Date:

•11-28-2017

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 1

---

## Page 2

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA EPAIR (41 CFR 101-11.6

UNITED STATES

GU VERNMENT®

Memorandum

Assoc. Dir. _

TO

•Mr. J. B.rAdams

FROM

:Legal Counse

1 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr. Cochran

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Cregar

DATE:

8/12/75

1 - Personnel File -

Wilbur G. Stevens

1 - Mr. Hotis

I - MI. Daly

Dep. AD Adm; -

Dep. AD InVer

Asst. Dirri

Comp. Syst

Ext. Affairs

Files &. Com.

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

nspectio

Laboratory

Legal Coun. -

Plan. & Eval. -

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY

Spec. Inv. _

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

Michael Epstein, Staff Member, Senate Select Committee,

requested on 8/12/75 that Special Agent Wilbur G. Stevens be made

available for a Staff interview Thursday, 8/14/75, at 10 a.m. in

Room G308, Dirksen Building. Stevens is

currently assigned at

FBI Headquarters in the Laboratory Division. Epstein stated the

topic of interview would be the Bureau's investigation of Martin

Luther King in the Southern Christian Leadership Conference

(SCLC) .

RECOMMENDATIONS :

(1) That SA Stevens be released from his existing

employment agreement for purposes of this interview concerning

the Bureau's investigation of Martin Luther King in SCLC.

(2)

That an Intelligence Division representative be

available but not present during the interview of SA Stevers to

assist in making a determination whether a question may be

properly responded to.

REC-56

Mess lie

U2111-345-6088

PVD: lad

(9)

662-2011/86)

NO SEP 1 7 1975

1516768,08

DocId: 3298963y Pausagues Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 3

FRANK SHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN

JOJIN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMA

PHILIP'A. HARTI-MICH.

WYALTER F, MONDALE, MINN:

HOWARD H. BAKEE,

BARRY COLDWATER, AR!T.

WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHARLES•MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD.

ROBERT MORGAN, N.C.

RICHARD 5. SCHWEIKER, PA.

GARY HARI, CELO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DiRECTOR

FREDERICK A. 0. SCHWARI, JP., CHIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

Dinited Siates Benate

SELECI COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RE5,31, STTH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

August 27, 1975

FBI

Michael E. Shaheen, Jr., Esg.

Special Counsel for Intelligence

Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

ữ. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D.C. 20530

1oa6a SPRAINETE

Dear Mike:

Sensti.!

- %3

Attached is an additional request for FBI

materials in two parts, Part I for delivery to the

Committee offices anã Part II for access io screen

for delivery to the Committee offices.

Except where covered by other arrangements,

as with regard to the kine marters.

ine deadline

for delivery/access is September &

S1975.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely

• Ku

ENCLOSURE,

Per

Unit

renstude

9/2/759

Juit. Elit

John I. EllifI

Director

Domestic intelligence Task Force

REC-56

62-11232-599

HIS SEP 4 1975

Denillie changed ta

RECEIVED

AUG 2W 1975

conferénce, 8/a7/1,

Supus, Pr. Daly+ 59740105

Elliffalso

Part I

awne for be fa

i, toes.

g 9 SĐP

ACCESS, ept delivery, 1)

11313,

MH 55138 DocId: 32989634

trist as Origine

102-11632

5-ux

---

## Page 4

August

1975

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

Part I. Request for Delivery

1. Materials pertaining to NSA watch list activity, requested

for access in Part V.E. of the request of August 5, 1975.

2. Additional materials pertaining to NSA watch list activity,

as set forth below.

.d.

The original list on American citizens whose names were

submitted by the Bureau to the NSA for inclusion on

the Watch List.

This list is referred to in the 18

May 1962 memorandum from W. R. Wannall to W. C. Sullivan.

-

b.

The original request to the NSA to monitor illegal travel

between Cuba and the United States through a third country.

This request is referred to in the 16 January 1963 memorandum

from W. R. Wannall to w. C. Sullivan.

c.

A list of all American citizens among the 65 individuals

in Cuba whose names were submitted by the Bureau to

the NSA for inclusion on the Watch List. This list is referred

to in the 16 January 1963 memorandum from. W. R. Wannall to

w. C. Sullivan.

ã. A list of the 300 Security Index subjects whose names were

submitted by the Bureau to the NSA for inclusion on the

Watch List.

These subjects are referred to in the 16

January 1963 memorandum from W. R. Wannall to W. C. Sullivan.

e.

The Bureau's Watch List for the NSA which was current as

of 1 April 1965. This list is referred to in the 6 April.

1965 memorandum from W. R. Wannall to w. C. Sullivan.

f. Materials pertaining to correspondence between the Bureau

and the NSA regarding the Watch List fom 1965 to 1970.

.g. A list of the "New Left Key Activists" whose names were

submitted by the Bureau to the NSA for inclusion on the

This list is referred to in the 3 June 1970

h. A list of the individual black extremists whose names were

submitted by the Bureau to the NSA for inclusion on the Watch

List.

This list is referred to in the "Note" at the end of

9 March 1971 letter from J. Edgar Hoover to the Director, NSA.

i. The 29 memoranda regarding weatherman fugitives which were

enclosed with the 16 April 1973 letter from I. Patrick Gray

. to the Director, NSA.

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 4

ENCLOSURE: 2-116-395-594

---

## Page 5

- 2-

j. The Watch List current as of 21 September 1973. This Watch

List is referred to in the 26 September 1973 internal

memorandum on the Keith case.

K.

A copy of the Watch List which was delivered to Henry

S. Petersen.

This Watch List is referred to in the 22

January 1974 letter from Petersen to Director Kelley.

1.

The "product" received from the NSA regarding the following

Individuals and organizations whose names had been submitted

by the Bureau for inclusion on the Watch List:

1) Grover C. McArthur

2) Roy Innis

3) Charles Garry

Student National Coordinating Committee

5) Black Student Association, Memphis State University

3. The following materials pertaining to mail surveillance:

à.

Memorandum from D. J. Dalbey to Mr. Tolson, dated 26

July 1971, captioned

| "Mail Covers/Trash Covers."

Letter Erom William u. Cotter, Assistant

Postmaster

General, Inspection Service, to J. Edgar Hoover, dated

12 October 1971. This letter is referred to in the

letter from Mr. Hoover to Mr. Cotter dated 14 October

--

1971.

c.

Memorandum from W. R. Wannall to E. S. Miller, dated

13 October 1971 captioned "Requests for Mail Covers."

This memorandum is referred to in the letter from

MI. Hoover, to Mr. Cotter dated October 14, 1971.

d.

Memorandum from the Legal Counsel to j. B. Adams, dated

15 July 1974, captioned "Mail Covers."

This memorandum

is referred to in the 15 July 1974 memorandum from the.

Director, FBI, to the Assistant Attorney General,

Criminal Divison, captioned "Mail Covers."

e.

All materials pertaining to requests by the Bureau for

special mail covers from 1971 through 1975 which have not

been previously delivered to the Senate Select Committee.

This request encompasses all special mail covers which

have been terminated, regardless of whether the investi-

gation for which the

special mail cover was requested is

active or inactive.

HH 55138 DooId: 32989634

Page 5

---

## Page 6

-3-

f. All materials pertaining to cases in which prosecution

of persons whose mail was intercepted was considered

by the Justice Department.

This request includes, but

is not limited to, material pertaining to meetings or

• correspondence between Bureau

and Departmental personnel ir

regard to such cases, material pertaining to the decisions

not to prosecute, and material pertaining to knowLedge of

any Department personnel of FBI mail intercept activity

in such cases.

g.

All materials reflecting

knowledge and/or authorization of

FBI mail intercept activity by Department officials.

4. All materials pertaining to the following FBI practices,

including but not limited to the origins, authorization,

periodic review, and termination of the practices:

a.

Use of automatic data processing by the Extremist

Intelligence and New Left Sections, and any other

related Sections, of the FBI Intelligence Division

in connection with the Computerized Telephone Number

File.

5.

b.

Incorporation of the Security Index into the FBI's

computerized feta bank and the availability.of.this...

data to all offices through automatic data processing.

The use of automatic data processing to store, collate,

or otherwise handle lists of Key Activists, New Left,

and Extremists individuals, addresses, phone numbers,

demonstrations in which certain individuals have parti-

cipated, summary reports or listings required for

dissemination to the field offices or other interested

agencies, and any related matters, as proposed by Inspector

E.S. Miller on 9/1/71 (p.331 of 9/71 Inspection Report) .

The Executive Conference memoranda reflected in the following

abstracts:

94-3-1-23957

66-2554-12745

66-2554-12761

66-2554-12790

66-2554-12795

66-2554-12801

66-2554-12806

66-2554-12808

66-2554-12828

66-2554-12832

66-2554-12834

HH 55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 6

---

## Page 7

66-2554-12848

66-1554-12875

66-2554-12877

66-2554-12887

66-2554-12910

66-2554-12949

66-2554-12958

66-2554-12962

66-2554-12961

66-2554-12964

66-2554-12968

66-2554-12966

66-2554-12971

66-2554-12972

66-2554-12978

66-2554-12984

66-2554-12996

66-2554-12998

66-2554-12999

66-2554-13001

66-2554-13011

66-2554-13014

66-2554-13016

0u-2554-13025

66-2554-13026

6. The following materials pertaining to COINTELPRO:

a.. Unexcised copies of all originating documents previously

delivered pursuant to letter of July I8, 1975.

b.

The July 14, 1964 memorandum from Mr. Baumgardner to

Mr. Sullivan, captioned "Counterintelligence Program,

Internal Security (Soviet-Satellite Intelligence) "

contains the following statement:

"At: the end of this

90-day trial period, we will evaluate our success and

thereafter submit recommentations..

Please submit

all memoranda and other materials reflecting said

evaluation and recommendations.

C.

The July 15 airtel to SAC, New York, Chicago, and

Washington Field, captioned "COINTELPRO--Internal

Security, (Soviet-Satellite Intelligence) contains the

following statement:

"Within 30 days each of these

offices should

submit to the Bureau necommendations

and detailed plans for implementing ome or several

such operations."

Please submit all memoranda and

materials reflecting said recommendations and detailed

plans.

55138 DocId:32989634 Page

---

## Page 8

- 5 -

d.

e.

The airtel described in Item c. above also contains the

statement:

"Other offices participating in the COINTELPRO

against the CPUSA are urged to.. • promptly make available

any comments or suggestions to. the Bureau and the

3 offices

participating in this new endeavor."

Please submit all

memoranda and other materials reflecting said comments

and suggestions.

The airtel described in Item c. above also refers to

"Bulets dated 9/13/63 and 3/16/64" which were attached

to said airtel. Please submit copies of these two "Bulets".—

The August 25, 1967 letter described in Item e. above

includes the statement:

"At this time the Bureau is

setting up no requirement for status letters to be period-

ically submitted under this program." Please submit any

materials which subsequently set up a requirement for

status letters, and all status letters which were there-

after received.

9.

All memoranda and other materials which reflect recom-

mendations and decisions at FBI Headquarters to transmit

the letter described in Item e. above.

"...

.*"

h.

An unexcised copy of the March 4, 1968 airtel from the

Director to the SAC, Albany, captioned "Counterintelligence

program, Black Nationalist-Hate Groups, Racial Intelligence."

i.

The March 4, 1968 airtel described in Item h. above

contains

"Instructions" that each of the addressed field

offices are to submit certain advice, summaries, lists,

and

suggestions within 30 days. Please forward all

memoranda and materials received by Headquarters in

response to the instructions.

(These need not include

the individual suggestions which were to be submitted "by

separate letter!)

J.

The March 4, 1968 airtel

described in Item h. above also

equires each office to "submit a progress letter"

each

90-days. Please submit copies of all such progress letters.

k. All status letters received by FBI Headquarters pursuant

to the instructions contained in the may 10, 1968 letter

Erom the Director to all offices, captioned "Counterintelligence

Program, Internal Security, Disruption of the New Left."

NH 55138 DocId:32989631 Page 8

---

## Page 9

- 6 -

1. The "NYlet captioned "Communist Party, USA; Counter-

intelligence Program; IS - C: (La Cosa Nostra);"

dated 9/22/66" which is referenced in the communication

from the Director to the SAC, New York, captioned "Hoodwink

(Internal Security)" dated 10/5/66.

I. Bulet 11/14/60 captioned BOCOV, which is referenced in the

communications from the Director, SAC, San Diego, captioned

Counterintelligence-Border Coverage Program, dated 1/9/61.

Please submit all documents which modify the originating

documents furnished, including but not limited to the

-

recommendations and reports, dated 1/30/69.

Please furnish all 90-day status reports, as otherwise

specifically requested, from all COINTELPRO programs.

• p. Any yearly evaluations of the various COINTELPROS

prepared by the Bureau, the two documents relating to the

termination of all COINTELPROS: 1) memorandum from C. D.

Brandon to W. C. Sullivan dated 4/37/71, Captioned

• "Counterintelligence Programs (COINTELPROS) ; and 2) airtel

to SAC, Albany, dated 4/28/71, daptioned "Counterintelligence

Program (COINTELPRO) " •

7. The following materials pertaining to FBI activity with regard

to DI. Martin Luther King, JI.:

a. Page 7 of FBI's memorandum of July 24, 1975, identifying

electornic surveillance reflects that Dr. King "was

overheard on three occasions on tesurs on other parties"

Please identify the targets, addresses, and dates of

installation and

• termination.

b.

Memorandum reference in Item a. above indicates that

there might have been additional surveillances on which

DI. King was monitored, however, this information can't

be retrieved because the elsur indices

"did not come into

existence until October 5, 1966." Please provide

further elaboration of this problem in view of the

instructions sent to field offices in October 1966 direct-

ing them to submit "the names of all individuals whore

voices have been

monitored through a microphone installed

or a telephone surveillance operated by the office anytine

since January one, one nine six zero."

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 9.

---

## Page 10

- 7=

8.

The locations, addresses, and telephone nunbers of all

supervisors and coordinators for New Left and Black Extremist

coordinators

COINTELPROS for 1967-71 in the following cities: New York,

Newark, Los Angeles, San Diego, St. Louis, Chicago, Detroit,

Boston.

9. The locations, addresses, and telephone numbers of all

supervisors and coordinators for White Hate COINTELPROS

for 1964-71 in the following cities: Jackson, Atlanta,

Richmona, Alexandria.

10. All materials which relate to a meeting between the FBI

Director and representatives of Newsweek Magazine (Benjamin

Bradlee and Jay Iselin) in September, October or November

of 1964, including but not limited to:

a. Proposals, invitations, and replies for such meeting.

b. Arrangements, briefings, and preparations for such

meetings.

c. Summaries or other evidence of what occurred at such

meeting.

&. Conversations between Mr. Bradlee andfor Mr. Iselin, and

former FBI Official Cartha LeLoach on the day of the

meeting or proposed meeting with the Director.

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 10

---

## Page 11

-8-

Part II. Request for Access

• 1.

All materials pertaining. to FBI activity with' respect to the

following:

a.

National Organization for Women

bi August 26 Women's Strike for Equality

c.

Philadelphia Organization for Women for Employment Rights

d. October 23-October 25, 1970 women's meeting at Fellowship

Hall, Limerick, Pennsylvania

e.

New York Women's Liberation Center

f.

Women's Liberation Movement

•9. Women's Action Alliance

2.

The following Executive Conference abstracts which are

missing from the abstracts already provided for access:

66-2554-12741

66-2554-12742

66-2554-12750

66-2554-12753

66-2554-12788

66-2554-12789

65-2554-12825

66-2554-12830

66-2554-12863

66-2554-12870

66-2554-12898

66-2554-12925

•'.

66-2554-12930

66-2554-12936

66-2554-12951

66-2554-12959

66-2554-12964

66-2554-12988

3. All documents relating to disclosure of information to

• IRS Special Services Staff other than the documents

actually furnished

and all documents relating to (including

• documents generated as the result of) disclosure to FBI or

Justice Department of information gathered by Special:

Services Staff.

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 11

---

## Page 12

-9

4. All materials pertaining to the opening and maintenance

of a Bureau file, if any, on the following persons and

organizations, including material reflecting the

decision to open the file, the information compiled in

the

file, and any other Bureau activity related to the

subject and recorded in the file:

a. Ron Karenga

b. Whitney Young

5. The following materials pertaining to events in Chicago

in November and December, 1969:

a. All materials developed between November 1, 1969,

and December 4, 1969, relating to the existence of

weapons in possession of the Chicago Black Panther

Party at the apartment at 2337 West Monroe Street,

Chicago, Illinois.

b.

All FBI inspection reports or other reports

relating to the raid conducted on Decenber 4, 1969,

by the Cook County State's Attorney's police, at

the apartment identified above.

c. All FBI materials reflecting dissemination of information

pertaining to the Black Panther Party or members thereof.

plate ting

to the Cook County State's Attorney's Office or members

of the State's Attorney's police between November 1, 1969,

and December 4, 1969.

d. All FBI materials

reflecting dissemination of information

pertaining. to the Black Panther Party or members thereof to

the Gang Intelligence Unit of the Chicago Police Department

between November 1, 1969, and December 4, 1969.

e.

All materials reflecting

• contacts by personnel of the FBI,

including members of the Racial Matters Squad of the

Chicago field office, with personnel of the State's

Attorney's office, State's Attorney's police and Gang

Intelligence Unit of the Chicago Police Department between

November 1 and December 4, 1969, with respect to the Black

Panther Party and members

thereof:

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 12

---

## Page 13

August 28, 1975

# MOR16

SP-2 ALMITTE

TO:

John A. Mintz, Assistant Director

Legal Counsel Division

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FROM:

Michael I. Shanean, Jr.

Special Counsel for Intelligence

Coordination

SUBJECT:

Senate Select Committee Requests

.*..

10li2/00.

Attached are two letters from the Senate Select Committee,

one dated August 22, 1975, the other dated August 27, 1975. Both

were received by this Office today.

The letter of request dated August 27, should be treated as

part of the document request dated August 26, 1975, as the formen

specifically references the latter.

Please arrange for coupliance with these requests as soon

as possible.

ac: Paul Daly

REC-53

k1. 141232-598

12 SEP 4 1975

ENCLOSURE

treat as Original

- HH 55138

79 SEP: 71975

DocId: 32989634 Page 13

5-400

Len ESSEL

---

## Page 14

batta.

PINK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMA

CLIPIG. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMA

PHILIP A, HART, MICH.

HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., TENH.

WALTER F. ME IDALE, MINY.

BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.

WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHARLES-ME C. MATHIAS, JR., MD.

DEZAT MORGAN, N.1

RICHAND S. SCHWZIKER, PA.

ARY HIRT, COL

DInited Siates Senate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUEY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RES. 21, SITH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

August 27, 1975

AMARIS

10l2/00...

SP-2 ALm/ITE

Michael E. Shaheen, JI., Esq.

Special Counsel for Intelligence

Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D.C.

20530

Dear Mike:

Attached is an addition to the Document

Request delivered to you earlier today.

The additional

items

list should be incorporated in the Document

Reguest dated August 26, 1975.

Sincerely,

Solut Illite

Director

Domestic Intelligence Task Force

KET HI TA

55138

62-116-385-598

ENGLOSURE!

Page 14

---

## Page 15

August 27, 1975

#MORIG

10/12/00. SP-2A2m./118

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

Additional items to be incorporated in the Document Request

dated August 26, 1975.

Under Part I, Item 6

q. Paragraph (e) of SAC Letter No. 63-50, dated 10/1/63,

contains the following statements:

"The following offices should submit to the

Bureau, by letter under above

• caption ("Communist

Party, USA - Negro Question - Communist Influence

in Racial Matters") due 30 days from date of this SAC

letter, an analysis of their current coverage of

communist activities in the Negro field plus

details of their plans for intensifying such

coverage:.

Also, those_ 16 offices which

are participating in the Counterintelligence

Program on a continuing basis should include in

their next monthly letters due at the Bureau by

October 15, I963, any plans they may have to

neutralize or disrupt any Party activities

in the Negro field. Such information should be

set out under the category "possible Counter-

intelligence Activity."

Please supply all letters received by FBI Headquarters

..

in response to the above-quoted instructions.

All memoranda and other materials reflecting proposals

and decisions to issue the instructions quoted in

Item g. above, and all memoranda and other materials

pertaining to the following statement in the second

paragraph of SAC Letter No. 63-50, dated 10/1/63:

"There is also an urgent need for imaginative and

aggressive tactics to be utilized through our

Counterintelligence Program for the purpose

of attempting to neutralize or disrupt the Party's

activitiès in the Negro field. "

Under Part I, Item 7 :

c. The following materialswhich are referred to, described,

or discussed in the

January 30, 1975 FBI letterhead

memorandum captioned "Special Squad at Democratic

National Convention, Atlantic City, New Jersey, August

22 - 28, 1964":

ENGINE: 62-116-395-598

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 15

---

## Page 16

-

(1)

August 20, 1964 teletype to all continental

field offices captioned "Disruption of Democratic

National Convention, Information Concerning

(Internal Security)".

(2) "Follow-up instruction" issued on August 21, 1964..

(3) All "Bureau memoranda prepared setting forth

pertinent developments."

(4)

Letter dated August 21, 1964, to then Deputy

Attorney General Katzenbach which "responded

to a

request dated August 19, 1964, from Mr. John Doar..."

(5)

Memorandum dated July 22, 1964, furnished to the

White House "at the request of walter Jenkins of the

White House

staff."

( 6•)

Any materials reflecting Mr. Jenkins' request

referred to in Item 5. above.

(7)

Director Hoover's memorandum of September 10,

• 1964

reporting a teléphone call from Mr. Jenkins.

(8)

All 302's and any other materials or reports

reflecting the FBI's inquiry into this matter.

(9)

Memorandum contained in Newark files dated August 22,

1964 concerning technical surveillance at the

Democratic National Convention.

(10)

(11)

(12)

Materials reflecting the attribution "to then Senior

Resident Agent Clark that on Bureau instructions a

mike should be considered for the temporary Congress

of Racial Equality headquarters."

July 2, 1968 instructions that all Agent personnel

are prohibited to pose as newsmen or representatives

of any wire service for the purpose of establishing

an investigative cover.

All materials pertaining to the instructions

described in Item 1l. above.

HY 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 16

---

## Page 17

FRANK CHURCH, ¡DAMO, CHAIRMAN

POWN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHRIRMAN

PHILA A. HART, MICH.

MCNARD H. BAKER, JR., TENN.

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN.

BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.

WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD.

FOBERT MORGAN NiC.

RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, PA.

CARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

FREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ, JF.,

chIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

¿Crited

•States Berate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

....i

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

'"(PURSUANT TO 5. RES. 21, 36TH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

August 22, 1975

#MDRI6

10-12:00..

• Michael E. Shaheen, Jr., Esq.

Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20530

Dear Mike:

air-to-

RECINED

AUG28] 1975

- 1H

55138

Sb

on May 14, 1975, the Senate Select Committee to

Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence

Activities requested all memoranda and other materials

related to the 1969 disappearance of Associate Professor

Thomas Riha, University of Colorado, insofar as such memo-

randa and materials related to:

(a) efforts of the FBI

to ascertain the identity of confidential sources of the

Central Intelligence Agency; and (b) inspections and

administrative inquiries related to the disclosure. of

information to Dr. Joseph R. Smiley, then President of the

University of Colorado.

The Select Committee also request-

ed all memoranda and other material related to actions by

the Director or any other official of the FBI severing

liaison or terminating contact between personnel of the

yet the

FBI and personnel of the Central intelligence Agency. On

June 13, 1975, the Select Committee received a very ade-

quate response to the Committee's May 14 request.

The Select Committee would, however, like to

request one further item in relation

to the Riha case.

Specifically, the Select Committee would like to request

of Associate

all information relating to the disappeffIcE OF LEGISLATIVe AFFARS

ZEPUTY

DEPARTMENT

AH ORNEYCHER ERAL

21

AUG 28 1975-1

62-116-395-598

DEFICE OF REGISLATIVE

AFBA

92989634

Page 17

DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

---

## Page 18

Michael E. Shaheen, JI., Esg.

Page Two

August 22, 1975

Professor Riha, any and all background material the Bureau

may have on his disappearance, and any subsequent informa-

tion the Bureau has developed on his current whereabouts.

Sincerely,

Director

Domestic Intelligence Task Force

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

18

---

## Page 19

10/13/09

SP 2 ALM

CODE

TELETYPE

URGENT

1

. - Mx. J. A. Mintz

TO SAC JACKSON

I = Mr: #: B: Wangal

Wannall

AUGUST 25, 1975

TRON DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395) 1= US. 5. Histosa

SENSTUDY 75; BUDED AUGUST 29, 1975. 1 - Mr. I. I. Howard

REBUCAL AUCUST 25, 1975.

THIS CONFIRMS REFERFNCED CALL WHEREIN YOU WERE INSTRUCTED

TO FURNISH TWO XEROX COPIES OF CERTAIN MATERIALS WHICH WERE

SPICIFIED TO YOU REGARDING A. I. BOINICK, TOM HENDRICKS,

ALTON WAYNE ROBERTS, RAYMOND ROBERTS, GORDON CLARK, THOMAS A.

TARRANTS, AND KATHY ATSWORTH. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANGS ARE YOU

TO EXCISI ANY INFORMATION FROM MATERIALS WHICH YOU COPY.

EXCISION WILL BE DONE AT FBIHQ:

62.116

ACTIVE OR FORMER:

WHEN AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES.

2Z AUG 26 1975

BUREAU DEADLINE MUST BE MET WITHOUT FAIL AND MATERIAL

MUST BE

COVER

MAILED TO ARRIVE FBIHQNO LATER THON SEETHE SHOT 975,

AIRTEL.

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

TTH: ros sis

(8)

AUG 2 b 1975

NOTE:

8.370 VL

The above concerns a request from theyru

Senate

Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with

Respect

to Intelligence Activities, dated 8/20/75.

The request is for

materials pertaining to FBI activities with regard to the above

individuals in the Jackson and Meridian, Mississippi

areas during

the period, of 1967-1970.

These materials are requested for

access by 9/4/75k;

The materials specifically requested were

furnished telephonically to Field Supervisor Larry Buteau by

Sa 1., I:

Howard, who is handling this specific matter.

Assoc. Dir. —

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs —

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection _

Intell. -

Laborasory -

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MALL ROOM

В S1str Госта:32989634

TELETYPE UNIT

Page 19

KID

som

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 20

FEDERAL BUNCAU UF MNVESFIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

TELETYPE

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Acm

Dep.-A.D -Inv

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Aust

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv...

Ident.

Inge in Rip

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval

Spec. InV.

Training -

Lesal Coun

Telephone Ri c

Director Sec'y

NR 0D5 PH PLAIN

645

PM NITEL AUGS

27, 1975 DCC

TO :

DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM: PHILADELPHIA (62-2)

SEN STUDY 75

RE BUREAU NITEL, AUGUST 26, 1975.

MRS. KATHLEEN LOGAN, FORMER EMPLOYEE, SPOUSE OF SA RICHARD. E.

LOGAN, PHILA. DIVISION, CONTACTED AUGUST 27, 1975, BY ASAC LEE F.

LASTER RE POSSIBILITY SHE MAY BE INTERVIEWED BY SSE STAFF. SHE

INDICATED THAT WHILE ASSIGNED TO FBIHQ SHE PERFORMED DUTIES RELATING;

TO THE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. CASE. BOTH SHE AND HER HUSBAND"

INDICATED THAI IF CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, SHE WILL IMMEDIATÉLY ADVISE

PHILA DIVISION AND CONTACT THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION PRIOR TO

L

INTERVIEWS AND UNDOUBTEDLY WILL REQUEST PRESENCE OF AN AGENT,

PROBABLY RER HUSBAND, DURING ANY INTERVIEWS.

END

=

12: 114-35-5940

12 SEP 9: 1975

LUPY RETAI"

119107814*!

=,

5%1

84 SEP 4

1975

NN 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 20

---

## Page 21

FEDERAL BUREAU 0F INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 27 1975

TELETYPE

NROD6 AL CODE-

11836 PM NITEL AUGUST 27, 1975 LVV

TO DIRECTOR (62-116395)

PROM ALBANY

(62-2368)

SENSTUDY. - 7.5

REBUTEL AUGUST 26, 1975.

ON AUGUST 27, 1975 JOHN H. KLEINKAUF WAS CONTACTED

BY ASAC ALBANY ADVISED CONTENIS RE BUTEL.

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adma

Dep.-A.D.-InVa

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. ..

Comp. Syst.

Ixt. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

nspectio

talr 1441

Laboratory

PREIN IS LUCLASCITTE

AS 1012/00 55582 Am/5162 Spro. Inv. --

.,Plan. & Eval. -

Tr. ining

Legal Coun. ..

Telephone Rm. -

Dire nor Sec'y

END

SMD FBIHQ CLR FOR ONE

estates by sis sta

COPY RETAINED&IN

+2-67-777661

(enting)

REG 62111-345-595

84 SEP 4 1975

55136 " DocId: 32989634

Page 21

---

## Page 22

FEDERAL SUREND DE REVOSTIGATIOHI

COMAUMIGATIONS SECHON

NA DEL BA CODE

105SAM URGENT AUGUST 27, 1975 BJW

TO: DIRECTOR, FBI

NORFOLK

•FROM:

BALTIMORE (66-3127)

AUG 2 7 1975

TELETYPE

AmDR16

10/12/00 SP'2 ALM/11G

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adm.

Den -A D.-Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

MATE C

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. --

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm.

Director Sec'y

PERSONAL ATTENTION

SENSTUDY

75

cuffin com

RE BUREAU TEL, AUGUST 2, 1975, AND BUREAU TEL TO

ALBANY, AUGUST 26, 1975.

LATTER TELETYPE ADVISED OF FOLLOWING:

INQUIRIES MADE OF BUREAU BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

(SSC) CONCERNING BELOW-LISTED FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES SUGGESTS

THEY MAY BE INTERVIEWED BY SSC STAFF. WHILE SUBJECT OF

INTERVIEWS HAS NOT BEEN DISCUSSED BY SSC, INTERVIEWS WILL

LIKELY PERTAIN TO THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES® DUTIES WHILE IN

THE INTERNAL SECURITY AND/OR SUBVERSIVE CONTROL SECTIONS AND

MAY ALSO RELATE TO THE FORMER BUREAU'S INVESTIGATIONS OF

MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., COMMUNIST INFLUENCES IN RACIAL

MATTERS AND RELATED MATTERS. SET OUT BELOW ARE LAST KNOWN

ADDRESSES OF THESE FORMER BUREAU EMPLOYEES.

EACH OF THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES IS TO BE THERATELY 2 - 11455: 594

CONTACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE MIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE

MIZ SEP 2 1975

HH

4

SEP 4 1975

55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 22

ccinitress

---

## Page 23

PAGE TWO

STAFF. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN THE EVENT THEY ARE

INTERVIEWED AND DURING COURSE OF SAME, QUESTIONS ARE ASKED

WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES,

METHODS AND TECHNIQUES, ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS, AND THIRD

AGENCY RULE, INCLUDING IDENTITIES OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE

AGENCIES), THEY MAY REQUEST AN FBI AGENT BE PRESENT. BUREAU

WILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. AS A PRELUDE

TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED

BY SSC STAFF, CONTACI BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY

COLLECI CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION IO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING

OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS

FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF

ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS

COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND TO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU

INFORMATION. CONTACIS WITH THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES TO BE

HANDLED PERSONALLY BY SAC OR ASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT

FEASIBLE FOR JUSI CAUSE, TO BE HANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR.

IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONTACT, RESULTS SHOULD BE FURNISHED

BUREAU BY TELETYPE IN ABOVE CAPTION. IF A FORMER EMPLOYEE

180 LONGER IN YOUR TERRITORY OR TEMPORARILY AWAY, SET OUT LEAD

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 23

---

## Page 24

PAGE THREE

TO OTHER OFFICE IMMEDIATELY WITH COPY TO FBI HEADQUARTERS.

RE FORMER FBI EMPLOYEE JAMES F. BLAND, 4312 ROSEDALE

AVENUE, BETHESDA, MARYLAND, 20014.

INQUIRY IN VICINITY OF BLAND: RESIDENCE AUGUST 26, 1975,

REVEALS JAMES F. BLAND ON VACATION AT WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA,

DATE OF RETURN TO BETHESDA, MARYLAND, NOT KNOWN. MR. BLAND

CAN BE CONTACTED THROUGH HIS DAUGHTER, MRS. MARY LYNN WILDING,

105 RONDANE PLACE, WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA, TELEPHONE NUMBER

884-564-9477, HER HUSBAND'S TELEPHONE NUMBER BEING 220-0860.

IF NOT AT ABOVE, MR. BLAND MAY BE CONTACTED THROUGH HIS SON,

ATTORNEY ROBERT BLAND, WILLIAMSBURG AREA TELEPHONE NUMBERS

229-6381 OR 229-3770.

LEAD :

NORFOLK

WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA

IMMEDIATELY CONTACT JAMES F. BLAND PER INSTRUCTIONS

IN RE BUREAU TEL, AUGUST 26, 1975.

END

: VLN FBIHQ CLR

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 24

---

## Page 25

The Attomey General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE

SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

August 26, 1975

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr.

J.

A. Mintz

- (1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

I - Mr.

W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Gregar

1 - Mr. J. B. Lee

On August 15, 1915, Mr. John 1. Litt, Director,

Domestic Intelligence Task Force, SSG, and two members of

his

staff were briefed concerning our

intercept prograns as vell as. our participation in the

Central Intelligence Agency (ClA) Mill Incercept progran pen

your approval based on our letter dated August 13, 1975.

During this briefing members of the SSC staff

expressed interest in our participation in the CIA mail

intercept progran and inquired about a Stop List naintained

by the Bureau of individuals in won ve were interested.

The names on this Stop List were furnished to CIA fos its

guidance.

The staff members inquired if we requested

, and

received

infosation on the citizens of the U. S. and

domestic organizations in the U. S.

At the time of the

briefing

We have now located the Stop List mintained in

the Bureau for this project.

From a review of the cards

in the Stop List ve have detcrnined that names of AncriCan

citizens as vell as domestic orgmizations are included.

arrangenents to inform Mr. Illiff of the location of this

Corin to seven tic organte

forhim for review.

REC-1 42 =

14S 1975-

62-116395

1. - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael I Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Goordination

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

(10)

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plon. & Eval. -

Spoc. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. _

grego BEP 4. MAY/BOOM L

55138

DocId: 32989631

The wait

Jite

jit

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

TELETYPE UNIT

Page 25

---

## Page 26

/

1 - Мк.

J

Adams

2 - Ms. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr.

w. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

August 26, 1975,g

1 - Mr. L. F. Schwartz

The attorney General

Director,

FBI

U. S, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGINGE ACIIVITIES (SSC)

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE 2-22 - 99 BY SPUBJO-MLB

#421800

Reference is made to the August 20, 1975, request

of the SSC for FBI materials.

Enclosed is a memorandum for your approval and

forwarding to the Committee in response to Part I of the

not dest eat on which a deadline to delivery wad set u

for August 26, 1975.

Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the

memorandum prepared for the Committee.

Enclosures (2)

59₴

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: • Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

"Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

HE SEP 2 1975

IFS: 1hb/hik

(10)

NOTE:

Assoc. Dir.

ENCEGSURE

"ENCLOSURE IN BULKY ROOM"

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

A copy of Part I of the SSC request of 8/20/75 is

Asst. Dir.:

Admin attached to the file copy of this commnication.

Exact copies

Comp. sys.of the materials being furnished are maintained in the office of

Files a conthe Senstudy Project and a detailed record has been maintained of

Gen. In. the materials furnished. Arrangements have been made for a

Inspection representative of the Legal Counsel Division to deliver the

intell. attached memorandum as well as the materials being provided to

Lion, sovthe SSC on 8/26/75.

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. -

M/9Y 500M L

HIB

451

ДосТа: 32989634

TELETYPE UNIT O

Page 26

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 27

62-116395

• 9

¿i net for dissemi

mindings

by

person

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Мт.

J.

A. Mintz

(1 - Ms. J. B. Hotis)

#mOR16

MC) CO MT!

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 26, 1975

1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mx. L. F. Schwartz

U. S. SENATE SELECI COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLICENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Reference is made to Part I of the August 20, 1975,

request by the SSC for FBI materials for delivery by

August 26, 1975.

The materials requested in Part I have been

processed and will be delivered to the Committee on August 26,

1975, with this communication.

Considerable research has been necessary to gather

the materlal requested in Fart I, Item 7 of your request.

Material pertaining to the origin and approval of Item 7b

("The Extremist Speaks") and Item 7d ("Stop. the Bombing.

Campaign: A Communist Cause'') is being furished herewith.

We are continuing our research concerning the remaining

publications listed in Item 7 and any pertinent material

located will be forwarded by September 4, 1975. With regard

to your request for material pertaining to periodie review

of the prepazation and dissemination of the publications

This in

1:00?07.

Iisted in Item 7, it is noted that Item 7d and Item 7e were

single publications.

The remaining publications were subject

to periodic review with each specific publication of the

particular item.

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

In connection with Item 9 of your request, special

Admin. -

arrangements between the Department of Justice and the SSC

Comp. Syst.- provide that this material be furnished to the Department

Files&co-prior to being furnished to the SSC. The Department is

Gen. inv presently studying this matter.

Inspection -

Intell.

The information requested in Items 11 and 12 1s

Plon. & Evol. _being Forwarded by separate menorandum.

Spoc. Inv.

Training

1 - The Attorney,

General

Legal Coun..

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y - LiStLFßM

TELETYPE UNIT

ENCLOSURE)

ORIGINAL AND ONE

SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED

2-11632-5 8807900-80-020

COPÝ TÓ AG

HH 55138 DooId:32989634

---

## Page 28

August 20, 1975

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

2002

1ocia-00.

EMDR 16

SPiRALmIaTE

8/06f=5

/ Part I - requested for delivery by August 26, 1975

1.

Materials pertaining to the origins, approval, and

implementation of SAC letter 70-48 dated September 15,

1970, which authorized development of Security Infor-

mants between the ages of 18 and 21.

2.

Materials pertaining to a two-day conference

held at

FBI headguarters on September 17-18, 1970, with racial

supervisors from 39 field offices plus two legal

attaches, including the initiation of the conference,

the subjects discussed, and any advice or instructions

to the field related thereto.

3.

Materials pertaining to

the origins, approval, and

implementation of decision in 1970 to grant approvals

for Special Agents in Charge on their own initiative

to authorize use of concealed recording

devices by

„Special Agent or proven source in covering public

appearances by black and New Left extremists except

• where such appearances are at educational institutions.

4.

Materials pertaining to the Attorney General's testi-

mony on February 27, 1975, regarding "types of abuse

for which the Bureau has been susceptible in the past."

(This material was previously made available for review

per III. D. Of your letter of August 1, 1975. Delivery

is now requested.

5.

AlL SAC letters and SAC memoranda previously made avail-

able for access by SSC staff at FBIHQ. (Cf., Part IV,

item 3.)

lime

MH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page. 28

ENGASUS (2-116-395-592

---

## Page 29

- 2 -

6: Materials pertaining to the furnishing of information

to the white House in February 1970 and March 1970

regarding the role of Klan organizations in mailing

letters

; to the President protesting school desegrega-

-tion.

7. Materials pertaining to the origins, approval, and

periodic review of the preparation and dissemination

by the Research Section of the Intelligence Division

of the following:

a. CINAL, a periodic intelligence letter summarizing

significant items of interest in the security field;

b. "The Extremist Speaks", a monthly compilation which

shows the extremist views of right, left, and racial-

ly oriented groups and individuals:

c. "Special Report, Nationwide Civil Disturbances"

an extensive brief prepared at the request of Vice

President Agnew;

d. "Stop the Bombing Campaign: A Communist Cause"

study prepared at the request of the president's

Foreign Intelligence Advisory boara;

e. A secret paper for the U. S. Intelligence Board

analyzing

"Racism, Radicalism, and Nationalism in

the Caribbean";

f. "FBI Summary Of Extremist Acitivities", a weekly.

summary of racial extremist actävities.

8. Materials pertaining to the origins, contents, and main-

tenance of additions to, and periodic review of, the

National Security File maintained by the FBI laboratory.

9. All materials pertaining to Project HUNTER, including.

but not limited to, all memoranda discussing the origins.

approval, implementation, and periodic review of the

requests

by the

FBI for the opening of mail by the CIA

in connection with this project and any other CIA mail

intercept activity; and

all materials pertaining to the

origins, approval, and implementation of the requests

by the FBI for CIA mail intercepts directed at the

HH 55138 DocId:32989631 Page 29

---

## Page 30

.ver

..*

101 101

10.

11.

12.

following: SNCC, Institute for Policy Studies, Clergy

and Laymen Concerned About Vietnam, and Jeremy Stone.

Copies of the 90-day status letters on COINTELPRO

activities submitted by the Chicago FBI field office

to the Bureau.

Last known address.of former FBI clerical employee

Katherine Osborn Jensen.

Present office of assignment or last known address of

the following present or former Special Agents:

•a. John Kleinkauf;

b. William Forsythe;

c.

James Bland;

d. Paul Cox;

e. Theodore P. Rosack;

£. Robert Denz.;

g.

Fred Fox.

- -

IN 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 30

---

## Page 31

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

Senate Select Committee

ETR

[X LHM

[ Memo

I Report dated_ 8/26/75

Senate

Caption or Donate

Select Committeé on Intelligence

Activities.

(Part I of 8/20/75

red st by SSc.)

Origin

Deliver

by:

Received by:

-Dan 5/36/25

Title:

I Return this receipt

#IMDRIG

ALI TRIRE THEY CONTAINED

IrRUST IS UNCIASSIFieD

D117.10-12-00BxSP-2 ALm/ITG

14 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 31

---

## Page 32

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate

for review

but not transmitted,

If a document was made available

2. DATE PROVIDED

note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY

OTHER

8/26/75

3.

TO WHOM

PROVIDED (check

appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

Am0R16

1717999

IS NI CONTAINED

262-00 SPQALM/276

HSC

4.

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name

or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

lemorandun and enclosures

SSC letter 8/20/75, Pert I, Items I-6, 7B and D,

8 and

response to formal request, other-

6.

CLASSIFICATION OF

subpoena, etc.)

INFORMATION (enter

U, C,

S,

TS or

Codeword)

IS

7. Need under one for emperate key words from

Opertins procedures

Intelligence collection

list provided separately; if key words not listed

are

TREAT AS VELLOW S'WOO

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Materials pertaining to; Origins, approval, and Inplementation of SAt

letter 70-40 dated 9/15/70 which authorized developent of Security

Infornantas betweon ages 10-21; A 2-day conference held at FBI head-

quarters 9/17-18/70, with racial supervisors from 39 fleld offices plis

two legal attachesjorigins, approval and implementation of decision

In 1970 to grant approval for SAGs on their own initiative to authorize

use of concealed recording devices by a SA or proven acurce in coveralle

publie appearances by black and New Jeft extrenists except where such

appeazances are et caucations institutions; Attoznay Ganeral's testimony

on 2/27/75,

regarding "types ci abuse for which the Buzau has been

susceptible in the past'; All SAl letters and SAG memoranda; Furnishing

of information to the White House in 2/70 and 3/70 regarding the role of

Klan orzanizations In malling letters to the Fresident protesting schoo

desegregation; wrigins, approval, ald periodic review or the prepazacton

and dissentnation by the Research Section of the Intelligence Division

of the following: "The Extrenist Speaks", and "Stop the Bonbing Campa-go:

A Connunist Cause'; Origins, contents and maintenance of additions to

68-776395

3791, 84K: tmk

ORIGINAL VI MISDARIDE CANIRAL COPRUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

(OVER)

55138

DocId:32989634

Page 32

---

## Page 33

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

1H 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 33

---

## Page 34

Page two

andperiodic review of, the National Security Flle maintained by

the FBI laboratory; Copies of the 90-day status letters on COINTELPRO

activitles submitted by the Chicago FBI field office to the Bureau.

=1°

HH 55138 DooId:32989634

Page 34

---

## Page 35

1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

1 - Mx.

J. Cochran

(Attn: W. G. Stevens)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 25., 1975

1 - Mc. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

U.

I TENSE ACTIVITMES (SS6)

MiLi INFONMATION CONTAINED

HENEIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE2.2381 BYSPWAMIL

607%

Enclosed for your information is the original of a

memorandum concerning an interview by Staff Members of captioned

Committee of FBI Special Agent Tilbur G. Stevens. A copy of the -

memorandum is also enclosed for forwarding to Mr. James A.

lilderotter, Associate Counsel to the Fresident.

Enclosures

(4)

62-116395

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael E. Shaheen, JI.

Special gunce door REE 62 114: 75-594.

1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, JI. )

1 - 67-278117 (Personnel File SA Wilbur G. StevEnst) 2 1975 '

SFp: 1hb hb

(11)

UNREC COPY

Assoc. Dir.-

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst.-

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv.

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

MAIL ROOM

1H881 3SE PoAcId197589631

• 15.1.

ENCLOSUREL

Dep."

afte

TELETYPE UNIT L

Page 35

G70 951-346

---

## Page 36

62-116395

1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

1 - Mr. J. Cochran

(Attn: W. G. Stevens)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 25, 1975

1 - ME. W. Q. Cregar

1 - Mc. S. F. Phillips

UJ. S. SETATE SELECI COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERITMENTAI OPERATIONS WITHI

RESPECT TO INTELLIGERICE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE:

INTERVIBY OF FBI SPECIAL, AGENT

(SA) VILBUR G. STWEIS RY)

SSE STAFF MEMBERS

MURMATION CONTAINED

MENCIN IS Our!

ASSIFIED

DATE2:2381 BYSPESPMIM

607k

Set out below is Information concerning an

intervier of FBI SA. Wilbur G. Stevens by SSG Staff Members.

Stevens is currently assigned to FBI Headquarters. The

details of the intervier are as furnished by Stevens.

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst.-

Ext. Affairs —

Files & Com.-.

Gen. Inv...

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. __

Training -

Legal Coun. -_

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

HH 55138

On advance notice from Mr, Michael Epstein,

SSC Stafs Member, Stevens was advised that he was to be

intervieved at 11:30 a.Il., Augast 14, 1975, in the SSC

oftices. Stevens was

informed by the legal Counsel Division

of the FBI that he was being released from any applicable

employment agreement for purposes of the SSC interview

concerning the former FBI investigation of Martin Luther

King, Jr.

It was explained to Stevens that he had a

right to counsel; hovever, the FBI was unable to provide

private counsel.

Stevens was also told that there were

certain privileged areas concerning which he tould not be

required to answer questions.

These areas concerned infor-

mation tihich might divulge the identitles of FBI sources;

Information relating to sensitive methods and techniques;

information which might adversely affect ongoing FBI

investigations; and information which had originated with

other agencies, including foreign intelligence agencies.

Stevens was inforned that 1f a question arose during the

interview in one of these areas, he had the privilege,

before replying, of consulting with an FBI representative

1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

1 - 67-278117 (Personnel File SA Wilbur G. Stevens)

wocs

SFP:1hb (10)

ORIGILAL AND ONE COPY 10 AG C

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

12-116385737

SEE NOTE PAGE S

DooId:32989634

Page 36

ENCLOSURE

---

## Page 37

SETATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON IITELLICENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIDIT OF FBI SA BY SSC

tho was to accompany him to the intervier. This representative

vould not be present during the actual interview but vould

merely be available nearby in the event consultation vas

desired.

Stovens was intervieted in SSC offices for the

approximate period 1I:30 a.m. to 12:20 p.I., August 14, 1975,

by SSC Stafí Members Michael Ipstein and

lary Debreo. At

the outsot of the intervier, Stevens vas requested to, and

dic, sign an ADVICE OF RIGHTS statement, a Xerox of which is

attached heroio.

The following is a statement of areas covered in

the interview, as furnished by Stevens.

It should be noted that the subject matter does not

necessarily follow in a chronological fashion as it concerns

dates and times, or as it concerns the order in thich the

questions were asked. It should also be noted that the

Conmittee and Ipstein wore evidently interested in activity

pirpointed in the area of 1961-1967.

Stevens was first questioned about his background

and employuent at the FBI. He advised that he vas employed

In March, 1942; terminated temporarily January, 1944, for

military service; continued in March, 1946; terminated

temporarily in August, 1950, again for military service;

and again continued from August, 1951, until September, 1956,

when he tas appointed an SA with the FBI. After training

and a short assignment in the Charlotte, Morth Carolina,

Field Office, Stevens was transferred bacl: to FBI Headquarters

and assigned to the Radio Ingineering Section in the laboratory.

He has continued work in this Section since then.

- 2-

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 37

---

## Page 38

SENATE SSIEST COMMITTOO OU IITULLIGUICA ACRIVIIIES (SSC)

AD: INTERVICY OF TBI SA EX SSC

Stevens was nost questioned about the chain of

cornand in the laboratozy and who wade the assignents of

The chain of connand tas explained starting with

tho

Dircetoc; then the Assistant Dizector, in this case of

the laboratory; next the Section Chief; the lumber One lan

in the Sector; Finally dom to the SA level. It vas also

pointel out that at the time in question these tere no

Unit Chief positions in the laboratory.

The next question by Instein concerned the physical

Incatin pe various facilities of the Radio Engineering

Section; L.e,, there certain Sis mere assigned office snace.

Included in this question vas the Sa complement in the

office Elevens occupied.

Stevens replied that at the time

he occunied space in Room 7110 in che Eepartment of Justice

bullding along with five other Si Supervisors: John II, latter,

M1ll3en I. Ferrard, Robert i. Willor, Bruce R. Fisher and

Charles Ki. Corbett

Stevens also said that this comlerent

changed as people rotired ano that as changes occurred thera

vere additions is this group: Joseph B. Parsons and

Millian D. Campbell.

The question tas then asked as to whether stevens

leir anything aboat nagnetic recocding tanes concerning

Karcin Luther King, Jr.

ipstein was told by Stevens that he,

Stevens, did have Inowledge of this but received his infor-

nation only through hearsay, havini no dicect kro dedge as

to the existence at the time that nstein alleged

rere nade, Asked 1t he had listened to the tapes or to

i the hat

the tares

composite tapes, Stevens advised that he had not.

Epstein then asted Steveno who rould lave tho

ability to ort on tapes such as these. Stevens zuvised

that almost any of the Si. Supervisors previously mentioned

rould have the ability to sorl on tapes of this kind.

- 3 -

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 38

---

## Page 39

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE OT EITELLICBNCE ACCIVIIIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIS:/ DE FBI SA BY SSC

Asked if John Matter and Milllam Campbell could

havo vorked with this type of magnetic recording, Stevens

advised that they could have.

Stevens was asked whather they both could have

been doing the same things with these tapes and Stevens

advised ho did not Junot as he was not present at any time

thnt the alleged tapes wore being worked on.

Stevens as asked whether he loner that a composite

cape was.

Stevons ansvered in the affirnacive. He was then

asked it he had ever made a composite tape and Stevons

again answored in the affirnative. Stevens vas thon asked

whecher he inew that a composite tape was being made ai this

particular time which concerned Martin Luther King, Jr.

Stovens anuvered, "To." lle vas further asted whether ho

Inor that was done with this allegod composite tape and

Stevens again ansvered, "ro."

Questioning then changed somewhat and Stevens

vas asked if there wore any personal favors done by the

Radio Ingineering Section personnel. Stevens advised chat

there wore once in, a while; in ract he, stevens, had repaired

shall radios at various tines for people. Epstein asted it

Stevens had any Inowledge regarding complaints to the Section

Front Office about the frequency a those personal favors

or requests. Stevens presumed that there vere complaints

once in a while. When asled how these wore handled, Stevens

said he did not

lenor?.

Epscoin again asted Stevens about assignment of

work in the Radio Engineering Section and vas again told that

that time the work. nas assigned from the Section Iront

Office, cither by the Section Chief or the Number One Man,

directly to the SA Supervisors.

-4=

55138 DooId:32989634 Page 39

---

## Page 40

SOZINE SALACE COITISES 0.I LICUULICRICE ACIIVICICS (SSC)

Seevons was asked thon ie had last seen Jolm Matter

and soplied that he, Stovens, had soon lattor epprossinatoly

Ensicin asked 18 the subjeot which this

respondeù, "5." Inatoin chon Bade injutry as to the cirt

spont with latter und 'as adviped that latter vas in Stovons"

office foc amrosinatoly tus or thrce minutos. When asked

ho ras persent at the some time as Futcer, Stevens said

that a nuber of people tera present but that he could not

inflonte maces.

Epstoin culed Stovens if he hnd diccussed unychers

concornins the current intervie: with anybody in the FaT

prioc to the intervie and he tau advised that he lad not.

this reply by Otevens accrossed Itself to substonce zacher

chan proceduce.

Enclosure

NOIL:

Legal Counsel Division briefing of Stevens prior

to interview was by Supervisor P. V. Daly. Stevens was

accompanied to the interview by Supervisor S. F. Phillips

of the Senstudy 75 Project but it was not necessary for

Stevens to consult with Phillips during the interview.

WH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 40

---

## Page 41

FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN

JOHN G, TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN

PHILIP A. HART, MICH.

HOWARD H. INKER, JR., T

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN.

BARRY GOLDWATER, ART

WALTER D, HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS

ROBERT MORGAN, N.C.

RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, P

GARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAMS. MILLER, TAFE DIRECTOR

FÄEDENICK T

• O. ECHWARI, JR., CHIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R, SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

Writed

States Berate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO 8, HES, 21, SATH CONGHESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C,- 20510

1105/2-00.

#MDRIG

SAD ALM/JIG

ADVICE OF RIGHTS

Before you answer any questions, we would like to advise you

of your rights..

This interview is completely voluntary and you have a right

to leave without being interviewed, or to terminate the inter-

view at any time.

You have the right to remain silent.

Although the Senate Select Committee is not a prosecutive

body, it is possible that anything you say might become avail- :

able to a prosecutive body and could be used against you in

court.

You have the right to consult with an attorney before any

questions are asked, and you may have an attorney here with

you during questioning.

If you cannot afford an attorney, the Committee shall then

endeavor to obtain counsel for you.

If you decide to answer questions without an attorney present,

you still have the right to stop answering questions any time.

or you may defer your answer until you consult with an attorney.

WAIVER OF RIGHTS

I have read this statement of rights 'and I understand what my

rights are.

I am willing to be interviewed and to answer ques-

tions without a lawyer at this time.

No promises or threats

•have bèen made to me and no pressure or coercion of any kind

has been used against me.

signed: Heatur

Sisteners

Date:

8/14/75

Witness:

Witness:

They MicRea

---

## Page 42

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

TO: - Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW

PROVIDED (check

appropriate term.

If a document was made available

for

but not

transmitted, so note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

* LINTERVIEW |

| TESTIMONY |

| OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/25/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The Attorney General with a copy for forwarding

to the White House

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Memorandum reporting results of an interview of incumbent

Special Agent Wilbur G. Stevens by members of SSG Staff

5. IN RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in response

to formal request, other-

lise state verbal request of (name), initiative

subpoena, etc.)

NA

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C, s,

TS or

Codeword)

U

?. KEy under lent rot emphasip iate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

#MADRIG

Organization and staffing

-0991993

Surveillance, elecronie

1012-00 5P2Am /114

8. SUMMARY (see

reverse side before completing this item)

Former FBI investigation of Martin Luther King Jr.

62-116395

FMK: fmk

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS V10%

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379| (6-751

NW 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 42

---

## Page 43

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current 'or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Paye 43

---

## Page 44

2 - Mr. J. A.

Z

(1 - Мк.

J. B.

Hotis)

1

- MX.

E.

W.

Walsh

- Mr.

W. R. Wannall

1

- Мк.

W. 0. Cregar

The Attorney General

1 - Mr. S. F. Philliasgusc 25, 1975 •

Director, FBI

621631-540

# MORIS

U.

S.

SENATE SETECT COMMITTEE

OY INTELLICENGE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

1880

Reference is made to the SSC request dated

August 20, 1975, for matertals from this Bureau.

Enclosed for your approval and forwarding to the

Committee is the original of a memorandum which is in response

to some of the requests.

and slicks

A copy of this memorandum is being furnished for

your records.

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael. Shaheen, ar.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

SFP: 1hblhb

(10)

REQ-1

62-11-395-590

SEP

0 1975

saher's office.

liveredfo

Assoc. Dis.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Sys?. _

• Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen, Inv. _

ident. -

Inspection _

Intell. -

Laboratory _

Plon. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm. -

MAIL, ROOM L

81556 Fpoc4$32989634

TELETYPE UNIT C

Page 44

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 45

2 - MC.

A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mx. E. W. Walsh

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

August 25, 1975

62-116395

"re prowest and is not for dissemi

afical procecaings by

wisclosed to unauthorized person

FBI

in resease to

This document is prepared,

cut the contact me

express approval of the

nation orris: 1r

your Commiss

nel without the

#mDR16

1-10-1000

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL, OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECI TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVIIIES (SSC)

Reference is inde to the SSC request dated

August 20, 1975, for materials From this Bureau.

Part I, Item 11 requested the last known address

of former FBi clerical employee Katherine Osborn Jensen.

Part I, Item 12 requested the present office of assignment

or last known address of the following present or former

Special Agents: John Kleinkauf, Willlan Forsythe, James Bland,

Paul Gox, Theodore P. Rosack, Robert Denz, and Fred Fox.

In respect to Item Il, this individual's name is

Kathleen Logan, the wife of Richard E. Logan, an FBI

Special Agent assigned to our Philadelphia Fleld Office.

The Logans reside at #4 William Ellery Building, Clusters

at Washington, Turnersville, New Jersey 08012.

Data responsive to Item 12 is as follows.

Assoc. Dir...-

Dep. AD Adm.-

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin-an

Comp.Syst..com

Ext. Affairs.....

Files & Com. _

Ident. w

Inspection

Intelle a

Loboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv._

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. _

Director See'y .

MAIL ROOM

IN 55138 DocId:32989634

Page 45

As of 1969, John Henry Kleinkauf resided at

1153 Cullen Avenue, Schenectady, New York 12309, and was

employed as Director of Security and Safety, Union Gollege,

Schenectady, New York 12308.

William I. Forsyth (not Forsythe) was last known

(1971) to reside at 350 Boca Grande Boulevard, Punta Gorda,

Florida 33950. Note should be taken that on August 4, 1975,

during an interview by SSG Staff Member Michael Epstein of

Special Agent Seymor Fred Phillips of this Bureau, Phillips

furnished Epstein Forsyth's name and also advised

Epstein

that Forsyth is deceased.

SFP: 1hblhb

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

(9)

TELETYPE UNIT

162-1455-590

GPO 954-545

---

## Page 46

SCIATO SULECE GOZITUTUS ON LIDCULICENGE LGTIVIFIES (SSC)

Janes Field Eland Vas last Iroin to reside at

4310 Insedale ivenuc, Bethesca, Haryland 20014.

fuul Lesile Cor: vas last lanim to resido st

2101 Ingachon Stacoe, Ryatesvillo, Hozyland 20782.

11450

Fredericl: I. Jos vas last Inon to restâo at

1450 Vest Biscayne Canol Road, Illand, Florids 39161.

Theodore P. Hosack is currently Special Dient in

Churge of the Denver Field Office of the FBI.

Bolari Charles Pane is prosently cosigned as che

of the Spocial Agonts in Charge In the FDI Bicid office in

Mer Jori: City,

Ibe foregoing infomation is the tost recent

evoilable in the filos of the DiI.

I - The Attorney General

HH

---

## Page 47

iin., is

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

→ Memo [ Report dated.

8/25/75

capion or Senate

Select Committee.

request: Part I, 11 & 12

Originating Office:

Delivered by:

Received by:

Title:

- Date: 8/260/25

Phanage

FMDR16

AUL INFORMATION CONTAININD

HEREIN IS UNCIASSIFIED

NW |55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 17

---

## Page 48

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

TO: Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. Il a document was made available

but not transmitted, so note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY

OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/25/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Nehorandum

to formal request, other-

subpoena, etc.)

SSG letter 9/20/75 Fazt I, Item 11 and 12

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C,

S,

T'S or

Codeword)

7. KEy under fint rote paropriate key words from

the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

Orgenization and staffing

102-00 SPEArm F6

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this

item)

bat me Spades one ace of gent ye present

62-236395

EMK: Emk

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENIRAL COMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

7527

EINZAD LAD MELLOM

379| (6-751

IN 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 48

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

---

## Page 49

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here.

2.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whethe

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

WH 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page

49

---

## Page 50

FEDCIAL BUREAU GO INVESTIGATE:

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 1'/ 1975

001 NH CO DE

12:20

PM URGENT 8/17/75 RG

TELETYPE

TO :DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM: NEW

HAVEN

Dir. ...

De,- I.D.-Adm

Den - D.-Inv.-

Arr*

Dir.:

Ad: i :

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com

Gen. Inv.

SENST UDY 75

# mDR 16

ATT INFORZATION CONTAINED

TARTIN IS UNCTASDIZIED

* 10-1-00SP-ZALM/716

Laborat

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. --

Trining

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

REBUTEL 8/15/75•

FORMER SA JAMES I HAVERTY CONTACIED 8/16/75, BY SAC AT

Capite

HIS RESIDENCE, WESTPORT, CONN•

HAVERTY HAS ALREADY BEEN CONTACTED BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

(SSC) AID, FREDRICK BARON.

' HAVERTY IS TO MEET WITH SSC AIDES IN

WASHINGTON, DC, 2PM, WEDNESDAY, 8/20/75. HE WILL ARRIVE IN

WASHINGION, DE LATE IN THE MORNING OF THAT DAY AND GO DIRECTLY

TO THE BUREAU'S OFFICE OF LEGAL. COUNSEL FOR DISCUSSION REGARDING

HIS MEETING WITH SSC AIDES.

E

COPY

RETAINED

N

IN

PFRSONNEL

RECORDS

UNIT

-199711

REC-1$

62-111-30-589

32 SEP 2 1975

00-67.

5,9"

Legal coumane

ка 4585Р 40с19752989634

Page 50

---

## Page 51

FD-36 (Fey: 5-22-81)

Transmit the following in

Via

AIRTEL

F BI

Date:

(Type in plaintext or code)

AIR MAIL

(Priority)

8/15/75

100 SPLAMITE

TO:

DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395)

FROM:

ADIC, LOS ANGELES (66-6243) (P)

SUBJECT: U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

'INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC);

INTERVIEW OF SA WALLACE E. WARD

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

Faint

captioned "SENSTUDY 75"

Re Bureau teletype to Los Angeles dated 7/31/75

Angeles airtel dated 8/7/75

and Bureau telephone call 8/15/15.

Enclosed herewith for the Bureau are the original

and seven copies of a letterhead memorandum (LHM) concerning

the above interview.

EXIS

REC-1

48 5,588

EX. AUG t8 1875

acci de rest

Bureau (Bnc.

Los Angeles

wew/nc

(4)

8

Approved:

8

4 SEP 4

1975

Special Agent in Charge

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

51

- Sent

_ M

Per

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 - 455-574

---

## Page 52

In Reply, Please Refer to

File No.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Los Angeles, California

August 15, 1975

IIM2R16

2UD TROPE TION CONTAINLO

4010120037 SKZA2M/HG

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC);

INTERVIEW OF SA WALLACE E. WARD

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

On August 5, 1915, Special Agent (SA) Wallace E.

Ward was interviewed by SSC Staff Member Lester Seidel at

Los Angeles Field Office regarding Cointelpro/Black

Panther Party. The interview lasted from 9:12 a.m. to

9:22 a.m.

SA Ward was advised by Mr. Seidel that the

interview was voluntary but SA Ward was not advised of

his rights in this matter.

Seidel asked how long SA Ward had been a

Special Agent with the FBI, and SA Ward responded nine

He further requested previous offices SA Ward

had been assigned to, and SA Ward responded Cincinnati,

Ohio.

Seidel advised the Bureau informed him that SA

Ward had been assigned Cointelpro/Black Panther Party

in June 1969. Seidel requested to know what work SA

Ward had been assigned before this, to which SA Ward

responded he could not remember, but believed general

criminal work.

Seidel requested to know what specific

instructions were issued with regard to operating

Cointelpro/Black Panther Party.

SA Ward advised

that due to his employment agreement, the sensitive

nature of the Bureau work, and the possible overlap

of Bureau investigation, he did not feel he could

respond to any further questions.

Seidel advised he

understood SA Ward's position as he, Seidel, had

worked criminal matters himself and knew the need

tor secrecy.

The official interview was terminated

at this point.

HH

55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 52

62-116-395-588

---

## Page 53

In a friendly conversation that followed

Cointelpro/Black Panther Party matter for three

months and had no knowledge that would be of value

to Seidel.

The Cointelpro/Black Panther Party matter

was not further discussed.

The rest of the time was

involved in discussing points of interest in the Los

Angeles basin of tourist value, such as Marineland,

Palos Verdes, and Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles.

SA Ward advises that he is aware that the

Director waived his employment agreement with certain

conclude at or not the do onen areason, that.

he could not disclose any information without following

the prescribed procedure:

The burden is on me to determine, prior to

lisclosure, whether information may be disclosed, anc

in this regard, I agree to request approval of the

Director of the FBI in each

such instance by presenting

the full text of my proposed disclosure in writing to

the Director of the fBI at least thirty (30) days prior

to disclosure"

With this in mind, SA Ward answered Mr.

Seidel as noted heretofore.

This document contains neither recommendations

nor conclusions of the FBI.

It is the property of the

FBI and is loaned to your

agency; it and its contents

are not to be distributed outside your agency.

=2% -

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 53

---

## Page 54

In Reply, Please Refer to

File No.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Los Angeles, California

August 15, 1975

#MDR16

INE THE DE TION CONTAINLU

I REIN US WOUNDSTTIS

1:010/12/00 JxSP2 AMITIG.

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC);

INTERVIEW OF SA WALLACE E. WARD

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

In August 5, 1975, Special Agent (SA) Wallace E.

ward was interviewed by SSG

Statt Member Lester Seidel at

Los Angeles Field Office regarding Cointelpro/Black

Panther Party. The interview lasted from 9:12 a.m. to

9:22 a.m.

SA Ward was advised by Mr. Seidel that the

interview was voluntary but SA Ward was not advised of

his rights in this matter.

Seidel asked how long SA Ward had been a

Special Agent with the FBI, and SA Ward responded nine

He further requested previous offices SA Ward

had been assigned to, and SA Ward responded Cincinnati!

Ohio.

Seidel advised the Bureau informed him that SA

Ward

had been assigned Cointelpro/Black Panther Party

in June 1969. Seidel requested to know what work SA

Ward had been assigned before this, to which SA Ward

responded he could

not remember, but believed general

criminal work.

Seidel requested to know what specific

instructions were issued with regard to operating

Cointelpro/Black Panther Party.

SA Ward advised

that due to his employment agreement, the sensitive

nature of the Bureau work, and the possible overla

of Bureau investigation, he did not feel he coulc

respond to any further questions.

understood SA Ward's position as

seidel advised

he

he, Seidel, hac

worked criminal matters himself and

knew the need

for secrecy.

The official interview was terminated

at this point.

ENTE

TVINN

7776-1978

55138

1:544+544727-1

DocId: 32989634 Page 51

---

## Page 55

-or approximately ten to Ilfteen minutes, SA warc

advised Seidel that he had only been assigned th

that he hat on gạn a god tho

Cointelpro/Black Panther Party matter for three

months and had no knowledge that would be of value

to Seidel. The Cointelpro/Black Panther Party matter

was not further discussed.

involved in discussing points of interest in the Los

Angeles basin of tourist value, such as Marineland,

Palos Verdes, and Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles.

SA Ward advises that he is aware that the

Director waived his employment agreement with certain

exceptions regarding privileged areas. With this in

SA Ward reviewed his employment agreement and

concluded, after noting the following quotation, that

he could not disclose any information without following

the prescribed procedure:

the Pee at this 3 day pring

to disclosure".

With this in mind, SA Ward answered Mr.

Seidel as noted heretofore.

This document contains neither recommendations

nor conclusions of the FBI.

FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents

are not to be distributed outside your agency.

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 55

---

## Page 56

1

2

- UP. d. B. Adams

- Mr. J.

A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 13, 1975

1 - Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mx.

P. Lee

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE

SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTPLLIGENCE ACTIVITIOS (SSC)

10-11-0031

SP-2 ALm/116

Reference is made to the letter dated June 13, 1975;

gence

tochnique referred to as mail surveillance, including mail

covers and opening nail and the utilization of this technique

An

oral request has bech nade by John T. Elliff of Special

Agent W. 0. Crogar of this Bureau for a briefing on these

matters.

Inclosed herewith is a copy of the brieting we

propose to give to Ir. Elliif and his staff providing you

concur in this procedure.

This bricsing was originally

propared for presentation to the llouse Subconmittee on

postal Facilities, Mail and Labor Managerent; however, the

brieling of this Subcommittee has not taken place.

With reference to the request made in paragraph

three of referenced lotter, ve are currently attempting

• to

accumulate the docunents in response to that request and

they will be nade available to

the soc for aceoss.

-58

com.

Upon receipt of your

Concurronce We vill

3

W111 male

arrangcnents 10n

the briefing of Mr. Illiff and his stast

Dir.

AD Adm. -

AD Inv. -

іт.:

TE2-10533C5 ENGLOSURE

BIZ SEP 2 1975

1 - The Daputy Attorney General

Syst.

fairs

Com. -

Attention:

Michae1

E. Saaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

(10)

TOP

SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED

SHE NOIL LAGE 21Y

OPE

C

Rm.

M497. 800м |

Doetd: 39989611

TELETYPE UNIT L

Page 56

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-

---

## Page 57

The Attorney General

NOTE:

Proposed briefing will be concucted by

Assistant Director W. R. Wannall, INTD, and appropriate

members of his staff.

-

2

HH 55138 DocId:32989634

Page 57

---

## Page 58

The store% general

Director, FEI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT

COIVIVITTEE TO STUDY GOVEENMENTAL

OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

I - Mr: J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

587X

FMOK)6

Reference is inade to the memorandum dated August 13,

1975, frox Mir. Douglas F. Marvin, Counselor to the Attorney

General, to Vir. W. Raymond Wannall, of this Eureau, captioned

3 Senate Select Committee Request for Information on Warrantless

Electronic Surveillances, " which enclosed an SSC request dated

July 7, 1975.

Enclosed for your approval and forwarding to the

Committee are the originals of separate memoranda containing

responses to some of the requests. Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12,

17, and 24 involve statistical data and identifying specific documents.

This information is currently being compiled and will be furnished

to you immediately upon completion.

A copy of this memorandu, with attachments, is

enclosed for your records.

Enclosures (16)

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

nar

SSE

txeua.as

2/1.

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv..

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv..

Ident..

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spoc. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm.-

& 1: 2514

JWD:jmn imh

(9)

"ENCLOSURICRET WATERIAL ATTACHED 5- WOr/S

* ROOM

92989634

TELETYPE UNIT O

Page 58

G$) 951-545

---

## Page 59

"..

G2-116395

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W.. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W.

0. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

UNITED SINTOS SENSE STUSCE CONtITIOU

2O STUDY COVNRUIENIAI OPARAFIOUE

VINE RESPECT TO INTDILIGRICE ACITIVIDILS (SSC)

ME: REQUIST EDROAILING TO VARRANILESS

ELECIRONIC FURVEIILANCES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PUREOSES

Reference is made to SCC lotter dateú July Tr

1975, with attached questionaire:

Quantion 12 askod:

"Do Justico Dopartment standards

and proceduros for the authorization and scauthorization of

varsancless alcatronic surveillance require the concurrence

of the State Departront in the zoguest for such surveillanco?

With rospect to this question, State Dopartnent

concurrence is sequasted by the FbI prior to initiating any

clectronic survolllance directed against a targot with

diplonatic inmunity.

The lack that State Dapartment concurzence

has boon received is sat out in the initial roquest for an

clectronic surveillance subuitted to the Attorney Gcneral for

his approval and in any

equest for continuation of the

alectionio surveillance.

defcetors-in-place.

I - The Attorney General

ORIGINAI, AND ONE TO AG

Assoc. Dir. _

Dep. AD Adm. - JWD: caw

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

(8) 1470

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. _

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv.-

Troining .

Legal Coun

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

HW 55138

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

SECREE

Classified by 437518%

BRUM

Exempt from GDS,

Category Junbor

Date of Doclassification

Indetinite

624113855

58г

worl

MAIL ROOM L

TELETYPE UNIT

ENCLOSURE

DocId: 32989634

Page 59

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 60

SECRET

Jonate Jolcot Cormittee on Intalligence Activitics (SSC)

RO:

Request Pertaining to Harrantless

Ilectronic Survoillances for

National Sacurity Purposes

Classificd "Sacret" since unauthorized disclosure

vould jeopardize sonsitive nethods.

SECREE

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

60

---

## Page 61

: i:.

"..

62-116395

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

UNITED STATES SCHNIE SELECE COMMITICE

TO STUDY COVERNENJAE OPERARIONS

TINTI RESPECI TO INISILIGEXCE ACTIVITIUS (SCC)

RES REQUEST FENZAIHING TO HARIANITLESS

EZECIRONIC SURVEILIANCES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES

[oference is nade to SSC letter dated July 7,

1975, with attached questionnaire:

Question 13 asked: "That procodures, it any,

have boon follovad to obtain the concurronce of the Stato

Department in the request for warrantless electronic

curveillance?"

With cospock to this question, the IDI subnits a

vritten reguest in nezozandun fom to the State Department

roquesting concurionce in electronic surveillances directed

to targets with diplomatic status. I State Departiont

official indicatos hit irition concurrence ly his signature.

1 - The Attorney General

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

#MDR16

SPZALM ITE

10-11-00

JWD: caw

(8) Naw

NOTE:

Classified "Seoret" since unauthorized disclosure

Assor. Dir. — would jeopardize sensitive methods.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

sude

Classified by 1371%x

Isempt fron EDS,

acegory manper

Dato of Dolcassification Inderinite

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training ..

Legal Cour.

-

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

HH 55138

MAIL ROOM [

TELETYPE UNIT

DocId: 32989634 Page 61

1052-111 wel

-587X

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 62

::°

SECHOI

62-716395

2. - Mx. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mx. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mc.-W. R. Wannall

1

- Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

IS THE

90-DAY

It CONCERN

ASiT'S HERE

iN A GENERiC

SENSE.

UNITED SINIES SENATE SELECI COMITIEE

TO STUDY GOVERINENTAL ORERAIIONS

VITH RESPECT TO ITURILICENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: REQUESE PERTAININE TO IARRANILESS

DLBCERONIC SURVLILLANCES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PUREOSEE

Reference. is nade to SSC lottor dated July 7,

1975, with attached quastionnairo:

Question 19 ashod:

"ithat procoduros have boen

Followod for the rovior of all such surveillance on a

rogular basia to ensure thot the critoria for the surveillance

are satisfied?"

With respeci to this question, prior to Doccribei,

1966, Attorney General approval for the continuation of

national socurity electronic survoillances for periods of

six nontho vas obtained with individual letters which sot

out the faats and circustanecs prodicacing the Icquost.

Miter Doccabar, 1966, writion approval of the Actorney

Coneral for continuation of national security sicctronic survoil-

Lances vas obtainad on a quarterly pasis orrective on the firat

danuary. aptis, vuly, ant. votoet.

Thess quartarly requests

took the tom of a listing which identilied each surveillance

Since Docenbar, 1966, reguaste for continuation have

boon submicted on a 90-day basis.

Assoc. Dir. _

• JWD: caw

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. -

Ident..

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spoc. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. _

Director Sec'y -

HH 55138

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

DECREE

pun

Classified by 4375 9%r

Exeupt from CDS,

Categosy burber

2

Date of veclassilication Indotinitc

Wocks

MAIL ROOM L

DocId: 32989634 Page 62

TELETYPE UNIT [

ENCLOSURE

il.1?.

Go: 19760-568-9391

---

## Page 63

SECRET

Jonate Solcot Committeo on Intelligence Activitios (SSC)

Res

Request Portaining to Tarrantloso

Electronic Survelllancos for

lational Security Purposes

Leginning in June, 1969, requeets for continuation

oi national security alcotronic surveillancos voro subnittod

on a 90-day basia, but in tho foma os indivicaal Ioquesto tor

approval rather than provioudly subnittid listings. Theso

Individua coquesta apocily tho taccs and circunotancas

bringing about the roquest.

CurIenaLy ald Xequesis tor continuatIOn Di natiOna

socurity electionic survoillancos are roviowed on a 90-day

Lasis and cach request for continuation includes a statorent

of tho lacts and circunocances predicating the request.

cortain curront instances prior to approvina tcquested

continuation of alectonic surveillancos the Attorney Conoral

hao porconally caninel the record sotting forth the rosulta

at the survelllance.

1 - The Attorney General

NOTE:

Classified "Secret" since unauthorized disclosure

would jeopardize sensitive methods.

The Attorney General has examined logs of surveillances

on three recent occasions.

SECRCT

NN 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 63

---

## Page 64

...

SI

2 - MI. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - MC:

w. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. W. Dalseg

Zuguat 25, 1975

62116395

11-15-00

ULINED SIANES SENATE SELDOT COMMITTLE

2O SIUDY COVERUTINIAI, OPERACIONS

TITE RESPECT DO INTELEICENCE ACCIVIRIES (S5C)

RE: REQUEST PENIAILING DO WARRANELESS

ELECSRONIC SURVEIULAICES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES

Roforenco is nade to SSC letter dated July 7,

1975, vith attached questionnaire:

Question 110 stated "With respoot to non-

consencual electzonic surveillance insticused outaide the

United Statos by agoncies of the United States governrent"

and continued vich specitic inquiries.

flith respect to this question, and excluding one

particular clcotionic survoillance installed by a foreign

intelligence sorvice in a foreign country at IbI coquest,

the fBI does not ongage in cleatronic surveillances outrido

the United States.

1 - The Attorney General

JWD: caw

(8) CAW

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

NOTE :

The reference to the surveillance in a foreign

country is to Joseph Kraft (Bufile 65-75629) •

Assoc. Dir.

previously been advised that an electronic surveillance of

1 an sod chat

The SSC has

Dep. AD Adm. - Joseph Kraft was conducted at the request of a Bureau official

Dep. ADIv. - while Kraft was in a foreign country.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Classified "Secret" since unauthorized disclosure

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs —

would jeopardize sensitive methods.

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

Classified

4375.A6%6

Intell. -

Laboratory

Exeipt

THON ODES

Category lurker 3

Plon, & Eval. -

ABY

Date of uclassification Indefinite

Spoc. Inv. _

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

ANCLOSURE

Director Sec'y —

MAIL ROOM L

TELETYPE UNIT I

wors

62-111-1717

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 61

5877010-08

---

## Page 65

* :

62-116395

DECLASSIT IED BY SP2 ALMITE

07 11-15-00

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 = Mr.. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr.

J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

UNITED STATES SETATE SULECT CONIZIEZ

IO SEUDY COVEISMISACAL OLPRAZIONS

WITH RESPECI 20 INLELLICENCE ACTIVITILS

(SSC)

RE:

REQUEST PEDIATILIC TO UAREITTIESS

ELECTRONIC SUIVEILIANCES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES

Raference is made to sSc letter dated July 7.

1975, trich attached quescionnaire:

Question 114 asked:

#[hat have boen the standards

and procedures,

any+

that havo boon established for

detaining that 'the nininun physical intrusion nuosssary

to obtain the information vill be used'?"

(lith raspoct to this question, the apocific

standards and procedures for detomining "the mininum physical

intrusion necessary to obtain the infomation (chat) will be

used" vary vich tho type of elcotronic survillance, 1.2..

tolephone wiretap or nicrophone and with the cargot ot tho

alcotronie curveillance.

Telephono virotaps do not involvo

physical intrusion since the actual cutting in on the tolcphone

viro is accorplished ortomally to the tazgots promises.

Thc

circumstancos of a nicrophone installation with regard to

instance, when the microphono is introduced to the targets

pror ises

in cquipment to be delivarca to the zargot.

Currontly

the roquests fomarded to the Attornay Gonoral indicate the

neans by which the

installation vill be accomplishod.

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

m._1 - The Attorney General

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. _

JWD: caw

(8)

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Exempt

fron

Inspection -

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 65

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

1375 AB

Category Hunber 2

"Indefinite

ABS.

ENCLOSURE

5x7%

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 66

1 :.

SECRET

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities (SSC)

Re: Request Pertaining to Warrantless

Electronic Surveillances for

National Security Purposes

NOTE:

Classified "Secret" since unauthorized disclosure

would jeopardize sensitive methods.

SECRET

!

11H 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 66

---

## Page 67

3128

Peninge

62-116395

DECLASSIFIED BEST ALMIG

05 11-15-00

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr.

W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

ULITED SENTES SCHATE SLEECT COMHITICE

TO STUDY GOVCRINENTAT OPERANIONS

VIDH RESEECE TO INICLLIGENCE ACTIVITIUS

• (SSC)

NEE

REQUESZ PERTAINING TO VARRANTIASS

ELECTRONIC JUEVEILLANCES FOR

NATIONAL SECURITY PURPOSES

Reforence is nade to SSC lotter datod July 7,

1975, with attached questionnaire:

Question 115;

"with rospoct to warrantiess

«lectronic surveillance in casos of "lcals" of inforation

daened eithay

"essential' or "imporcant" to the security

of the Unitod States," asked the following questions:

Question $15a askoä: "Has there been a Justice

Dopartrent policy spacifically addressod to such cases?"

Question 115b asked:

"Have there been Justice

Department standards or procedures apacifically addressad

such cases?"

With respect to questions 415a and 115b, by

pomozandur datod Nay 9, 1962, the Attorncy Cencral approved

specific proceduros which rofloct tha policy of the Doparunent

in "Loak" casos and the procedures involved in the investi

sation.

These proccauros aze acill in cricot. A cOpy oi

this norozandun is atiached.

Involving questions (15c through 7151, no "Ical"

cases havo involved varrantless elcctionia surveillances

othor than the matters involving the "Kisainger 17* virotaps,

Joscph Kraft and Iconan Charles Janard Rodsord.

sitese matters

hava boon the subject of individual Senate Solect Connittee

Assoc. Dir. -

inquiries. The naterial furnished to the Cormittee or to which

Dep. AD Adm. -

1€ has boen given access providos the rosponse to or explaine

Dep. AD Inv. - .

the application of questions i15e through 1151. lo furthor

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

response is therefore boing nado.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs -

InClosure

Files & Com. -1 - The Attorney General

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. _

Inspection -

Intell. -

Laboratory -

RHR: CaW

(8) 1910

Plan. & Eval. -

Classified by

375M%

SONDE LION SOS

Category Humbar 2

Date of Declassicabation Indelinico

SEE NOTE PAGE

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

5

Director Sec'y _

MAIL ROOM

HH 55138 DooId:32989634

TELETYPE UNIT

PENSURE

Page 67

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 68

sofias

Sonate Jolect Cornictce on Intelligence Accivition (ESC)

No: Roguest Pertrining to tarrantloss

Jloctronic Surveillanaco for

Vational Sccurity Purposca

DZE:

Classifiod "sacroin since unauthorized disclosure

vould jeopardize sonditivo rethods.

sippers

HIT

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 68

---

## Page 69

Ap May 9, 1962

Federal Bureau of Investigation

The Attorzey General

moe 15

Unauthorized Disclosure of Classifica

Information to the Picss

By memorandua of February 12, 1962 rolative to the

capcioned matter you requested thai the Deparinent advise

whether the policy outlined therein meets wich the approval

of the Depariment. The policy as delineated in your memorandum

with respeci to various types of leal cases is set fouth heroin

followed by the advice of the Department.

"i. Restricted Data Under the Aconic Energy

Act - Upon receipt of allegations, ucually fron

the Acomic Energy Cormission, Of a leak of Restrict

ed Data we request detailed data from the Atomic

Energy Conniscion, whosc not provicucly fumished,.

on such items as date and identity of the arcicio;

aract ststenants alleged to be classified; whether

the data published is accurate; unethee the data

published vas classified properly; whether the date

can be declassified for purposes of prosecution and,

15 so, the name of the person competent to testify

concerning classification; che

extent of dissenina-

tion of the data; whether the data had been the

subject of prior official releases; whecher ie-

classification had been decided upon prior to publi

cation; wiether the data came from a specific docu

ment:

nd, if so, the origiz of the document; name

of the individual responsible for the security of

the classified data published; whether the material,

or portions, thereof, or enough background data had

been published officially or in the press to make

educated speculation on the matter possible; and

whether prior clearance for publication was sought

from proper authoricies.

We obtain such data to

assist the Department in determining whether an

investigation is warranted. Upon receint of the

detailed iata we refer the matter to the Internal

Security. Division for an opinion.

This procedure meets with the approval of the Department.

OSUR

PING

1: -115

1÷587X

HH 55138 DocId:32989634

'Page' 69

---

## Page 70

= 2=

2. Leaks of Classifiod Defenso Information

The esplonage statute applies to such leaks..

Upon receipt of zu allegation of a.leak of classi

fied defense data, not involving Restricted, Data

under the Atomic Energy Act; we advise the refer-

ing agency that the leak in question is administra

tive in nacure and is one to be handled by the

agencies possessing o distrlbuting the classiried

date involved.

In each instance we send e copy of

our referral and of our reply to the Internal

Security Division.

Miles 561149005499305

In the light of the specific statutory responsibility

assigned to the FBI to investigate leaks of Restricted Data

• subjeci to the Atomic Energy Act (42 USC, 2271(b)) and the

responsibility pursuant to a directive issued by President

Roosevelt on Septenber 6, 1939, reissued by President Roosevelt

January 8, 1443 and restrimes by. President truman on July t,

1950, "to take charge of investigative work in matters selating

to espionage, sauviago diù violations of cho nauceality zogula-

cions"

• It is the opinion of the Department that while cases

involving leaks of classified defense information should be.

considered primarily matiers to be handled by the agency which

is cesponsible for safeguarding the information, it remins,

however, the sesponsibility of the Department to determine

shether a specific set of facts constitute a violation of ou

criminal statutes.

It Is recommended that the responsible department 0r.

agency be requested to fumish the IBI at the time it reports

the leak to the bureau the same background data as now supplied

by the Atonic ergy Comission in 1Es cases. The FBI could ac

that time refer the natter to the Department for a determination

as to whether the investigation should be taken over by the Burea

For the purpose of attenpting to develop evidence to establish

Violacion of the espionage statutes.

3. Data covered by Paragraph 5, National.

Security Council Intelligence Disectiva Number 1 -

Normally we are not involved in the investigation

provided y this Directive. If we were one of

the recipients of the particular data which vas

leaked the Director or the Central Intelligence

Agency can call upon us to conduct an inguiry to

HH 55138 DooId:32989634

Page®

70

---

## Page 71

3

determine whether the leak occurred within

the FBI.

If called upon, we conduct such

an saguiry but we do not get itvoived out-

side the EBI.

This procedure mets with the approval of the Departmoat.

HH

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 71

---

## Page 72

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. M. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr: J. W. Dalseg

August 25, 1975

52-116395

#MDA16

58-2 ALM/STE

UNITED SINTES SENATE SELECT COÍNITICE

IO SEUDY COVERNMENTAL OPERAFIONS

WIFE

RESPECE TO INCIILIGINICE ACTIVIDIES (SSC)

RE:

REQUEST PERIZINING IO IZRRANTLESS

ELUCERONIC SURVRIELANCES POR

NATIONAE SECURITY PURPOSES

Reference is made to ssc letter dated July 7, 1975,

with attached questionnaire:

Question 121 assed: "In his testiony baforo the

House Subcormittee on Courts, Civil Hiberties, and the

Roninistration of Justice, Clarence M. Kelley

stated that

he would accept a requirenent of judicial warrants for national

security electronic surveillance if the stondard for iszuance

of the warrant vas "less than probable cause*"

Then asked

by tir. Badillo vhai the appropriate standard should be, he

anstered,

"I think reasonable grounas, that as a rosult of

the pursuit of an investigation (it is), possible to believe

that there has boon, or will be, or thore is a nood for the

gathering of intelligence."

Doos this statement rcflect the

official position of the ISI in regard to (1) a varcant

roquirchent for national security electionic survoillance, and

(2) the appropriato standarú for the insuance of & warrant?*

With respect to this question, py response was in

connection vith hearings on Il. I. 214 and D. k. 141 Which

were designed to restrict the powers ot the President and

executive agencies in electronic surveillances.

Assoc. Dir.

There have boon a number of proposals for judicial

Dep. AD Adm. -

approval of national security electronic surveillancos.

Such

Dep. AD Inv. -

proposals may raise serious Constitutional questions regarding

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Congressional authority to lindt the powers of the Fresident

Comp. Syst. _

in natters aficoting national security.

Ext. Affairs -

Gen. Inv. _

(8X

Ident: -

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO AG

Inspection -

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. =

Spoc. Inv._

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y _

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT I

HH 55138 DocId:32989634

Page 72

12-1163%5

105011

ENCLOSURE

100C L

GPO: 1975 0

6083-20

---

## Page 73

Schata Sulect Connietco on Intolligance Motivitios (SEC)

Ros

Requesi percaining to Warrantloas

Electronic Survillancos for

National Socurity Purposus

I indicatou in my oponing ronarks when I aproarod

louse Subcoractoo on Courto, Civil Inscetzoo anu

the Mininistration of Justico on Juno 26, 1975, that close

ware cortain provisiono of ll. R. 214 and li. R. 141 which

wore ill-advicod. I diacurced ty sonorationa nt longth in

my opaning romarko. I fool the spocific provisions of cach

proposul of this typo rust be studica at lengch and ry

response to Congresanan Dadillo which is quoted chould not be

read as my definitive position regarding varront scquirosenis

or the scandard necessary for the iccuance of varranis in

national socurity alcctronic survoillances.

I - The Attorney General

NOTE:

Question #20 is to be answered by the Department

regarding the Department's opposition to a

specially-designated

court to review applications for warrants

in national security

electronic surveillances. Above reply is being used in order

that the Bureau's position would not appear to conflict with

that of the Department.

= 2-

AH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

73

I was

---

## Page 74

TO

ATIONAL FORM NO. 1'

• *JULY 1973-EDITION

GSA FPMR, (41 CFR) 101-11.6

SEGRET MATERIAL ATTROIS

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

W. Raymona Wannall

Assistant Director, Intelligence Division DATE:

Federal Bureau of Investigation

August 13, 1975

#M DR16

FROM

Douglas R. Marvin

DIM Counselor to the Attorney General

SUBJECT:

Senate Select Committee Request for Information

on Warrantless "Electronic Surveillances

i 10:11.60

.SP-Z.ALM)ITG

In accord with our telephone conversation of August 12th,

I am forwarding to you a letter from the Senate Select

Committee requesting answers to questions relating to

electronic surveillance conducted by the Federal govern-

ment in the interests of national security. The Committee

has been told that we would try to respond

to their

request by August 20th. That date is fast approaching

may not be a reasonable period of time in which to

compile the information requested and respond to their

questions. That date is a useful target, however, since

any issues to be presented to the Attorney General

with

respect to complying to this request must be considered

prior to August 19th, the date the Attorney General is

scheduled to leave Washington.

Would your office please prepare responses to the following

questions that involve areas with which, I believe, you

are familiar: questions 2-10, 11(b)-(d), 12, 14, 15, 17,

21 and

24.

Thank you.

REC: 112

62-11558-5877

FEB

1% 1976

546/75

to fit

Enel-16

155138010-10

DocId: 32989634

SECRET MATERIAL ATTAGNED

Buy. U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

Page 74

---

## Page 75

20119150. 709080, T5X93. VI-iCa.

Tel400. 399.715485.

NATES: 1. 89901908311, riso

1:10$L5.510=5.100710:0%.010,u0.

CRA: HAAT, COLO.

WILLIAXES. MILLED, GYRFF CORIETON

KHEDEHICK Я, @ 30M6:947,39",5161-5004126-57

CURTIST-SMOTHERS, MINSINITY COUNSEL

Jabir

SECRET

R43=

DIailed, Blates Bencte

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

COPY.

6

STUDY COVERNMENTAL MENTIONS WITH

0F 8

FLESPECT TO INTELLIGUILE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUIT TO S. RES, 21, IU1!1 CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20550

July 7, 1975

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20530

Dear Mr. Atiorney General:

Thank you fox your letters of June 24 and jine

' 25,.1975, relating to electronic surveillance conducted by

the federal government in the interests of national secu-

rity and foreign intelligence.

also

appreciates your providing the information of a

Your letters, and the

recent testimony of Kevin

I. Maroney and Clarence M. Kelley before the house suc

conmittee on Courts, Civil Liberties,

and the Adrinistration

of Justice, have raised several additional. questions which

the Committee wishes

to pursue.

Further questions

are

raised by the July 1, 1975, Hhite House news briefing by

the

Press Secretary relating to the effect of the recent

Zweibon decision.

Some of these questions

relate to general

Policy considerations in the elcotronic surveillance area;

others address our need for a more complete factual base

from which we can draw our conclasions.

# list of these

These questions, of

course, do not supersade prior requests for material

relating to electronic surveillance, which are itonized in

the document requests of May 2, June Ib, and June 2T.

you told be considerde as supremety to

587X

55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 75

---

## Page 76

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Page two

SECRET

July 7, 1975

I believe that the answers to these questions""

are essential to a complete understanding of the policies

ana procedures colloied by the Justice Department in elec

tronze surveillance cases. Full Information on these mat

ters is necessary for the Committee to fulfill its mandate

"to recommend the enactment of any new legislation.

necessary or desirable to strengthen or clarify the national

United States and to protect the rights of United States

tinued cooperation of the Justice Department, I am convinced

that the Committee. will be able to discharge this respon-

sibility in the critical area of national security electronic

surveillance.

Sincerely,

Frank Chuch

Chairman

N 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 76

---

## Page 77

SECRET

Warrantless Electronic Surveillance for National Sccurity Purposes

d.

A6º 2.

3.

With respect to the "Spocial Revicw Grop" which you

have established within the office of lne attorney

General, for the purpose of examining rcquests for non-

consensual clectronic surveillance without a judicial

warrant, the following questions are asked:

a. What have been the names and titles of the persons

sexving on the Special. Review Group?

b.

If the Assistant Attorney Gereral of the Criminal

Division is not a member of the Special. Review

Group, does he normally have the opportunity.to

revier requests for warrantless electionicsur-

veillance?

c.

Have any individuals other than those serving on

the Special Review Group or the. Assistant Attorney

General of the Criminal Division had the opportunity

lù revien icquesis for rariuntloso alcotionic sur-

veillance?

TE So, whom?

a.

e:

Does the spocial. Review Group have the authority

to deny rcqucsis for warrantless electronic sur-

veillance?

Does the Special Review Group review requests for

reauthorizations of varrantless elcctronic surveil-

lance?

Do Justice Department standards and procedires for the

authorization and icauthorization of warrantless elec-

tronic surveillance require the concurrence of the

State Department in the request for such surveillance?

If so, in what iypes of cases is such concurrence re-

quired?

what procedures, if any, have been fo'lowed to obtain

the concurrence of the State Department in the request -

for warrantless clectronic surveillance?

116-1:00

SEALMILIE

OSURE

+ 116-373-5878

TH 15138

DocId: 32989634

Page 77

---

## Page 78

i 2=

FORG

SaAd

What have been the identitios of the agencies and the

Presidential appointces iho have initiated requusts

for warrantless electronic surveillance from 1966 to.

the present?

5. How many such roquests have been initiated by each

agency and each Presidential appointee?

6. How many of the requests initiatod by each ayency and

Presidential appoinice have been approvca

• by the

- Attorney General?

7.

How many requests have been made by each agency and

each Presidential appointee for the continuation of

previously approved surveillance?

8.

How many of the requests for the continuation of pre-

viously approved surveillance made by cach agency and

each Presidential appointee have been approved by the

Attorney General?

9.

what procedures have been followed for the review of

all such surveillance on a regular basis to ensure

that the criteria

for the surveillance are satisfied?

10.

With respect to non-consensual clecironic surveillance

instituted outside the Unilcd states by agencies

the United States jovernnent, the following questions

are askoa:

a. What have been the standards and proccaures, if

any, established for the authorization and review

of such surveillance?

b. What has been the total number of such surveil-

Lances by year and by month for each year from

1966 to the present?

C.

What have been the identities of the agencics and

the Presidential appointces who have initiated such

requests From 1966 to the present?

d..

How many such requests have been initiated by each

agency

and each Presidential appointee?

e.

How many of the requests initiatod by each agency

and cach Presidential appointee have been approved

by the Attorney General?

35138 DocIt: 329

---

## Page 79

f.

9.

How many requests have beenmade by each agency and

each Presidential appointee for the continuation of

such previously approved surveillance?

How many of the requests

for the continuation of

such previously approved surveillance have. bech

approved by the Attorncy General?

h.

North Averica, other than the United States; (2)

South America; (3) Mastern Europe; (4) Fastern

Europe; (5) Africa; (6) the Middle East; (7) South-

east Asia; (8) the rest of Asia?

i.

For each

year from 1966 to the present, how many

such surveillances have been directed at subjects

who are United States citizens?

11. With respect to the requirement that the attorney

General must be satisfica that the subject of the

• sU}-

veillance "plans unlawful

activity directed against a

forcign power ox a foreign-based political gioup", ..

the following uuestiong ar askod:

To what extent does the recent docision in

Weinon is Mother is the voi do sata Contr

of Appeals

otherwise

affect this standard?

b. What has been the total number of subjects under

surveillance and installations for telephone and

microphone surveillance roguested and approved

undes the standard "plans unlaviul activity dircoied

against a foreign power" and under the standara

"plans unlawful activity dircited against a

foreign-based political group" for each year

from 1966 to the present?

c. How many of the subjocts in each category and for

each year identified in "y" above have been United

States citizens?

à. What have been the identities of all "foreign-

based political groups" ¿elated to the surveillances

identifica in "b" above?

HH

55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 79

---

## Page 80

howe

SECRET

12:

With respect to the requirement that the Attorney

Gencral must be satisfiod that the subject of the

surveillance is "assisting a foreign power or foreign-

basea polikical group", the following questions are

askod:

a. What has been the total number of subjects under

surveillance and installations for télephone and

microphone surveillance

requested and ayproved

under the standard "assisting a foreign power"

and under the standard "assisting a foreign-based

political

group" for each year from 1966 until the

present?

b. How many of the subjects in each category and for

each year identified in "a" above have been Unitea

• States citizens?

c.

What have heen the identities of all "foreign-

based political

groups" related to the surveil-

lances identified in "a" above?

13.

with respect to the requirement tnat the attorney

General must be satisfica that the requested surveil-

is "necessary .for national securiiy or foreign

intelligence purposes important to national security",

the following questions are asked:

a. Is this standard intended to supplant the standard

for national security electionic surveillance

under former Attorney General Elliot Richardson

ri.e., that the proposed surveillance must be

necessary to protect the Nation against actual or

potential attack or any other hostile action of a

foreign pover, that it be necessary to obtain

forcign intelligence information doemed essential

to the security of the United States, or that it

be necessary to protect national security informa-

tion against foreign intelligence activities)?

D.

Is this standard intended to modify the standard

for national socurity electronic surveillance under

former Attorney General. Elliot Richardson?

HH

55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 80

---

## Page 81

14.

= 5-

SECREI

C.

Il the answer to "a" or "b" above is yes, what is

the reason (s) for such change?

If the answer to "a"' or "b" above is yes, what is

the precise legal. authority suppoiting such:change

in the formulation of the standard?

e.

If the answer to "a" or "b" above is yes, what is

the rcason(s) for the deletion of the word "essen-

tial" from the formulation of the standard under

former Attorney General Elliot Richardson?

I: If the answer to "a" or "b" above is yes, please

give examples of hypothetical situations

where

national security elcctionic surveillance would be

permitted:

(1) under the current standard but not

under the former standard, and (2) under the former

standaid but not under the current standard.

What have been the standards and procedures, if anys

that have been established for determining that "the

minimum physical intrusion

necessary to obtain the

information will be usca"?

ween respece lu varianiiano dicieunio suiruisiana

in cases of "leaks" of information doened either "es-

sential" or "imporiant" to the security of the united

States, the following questions are asked:

a. Has there beon a Justice Department policy specifi-

cally addressed to such cases?

•1. Have there boen Justice Department standards or

procedures specifically addressed to such cases?

c. Have surveillances in such cases been approved by

the Attorney General under the standard "assisting

• a forcign power or a foreign-based political group"?.

If the answer to "c" above is no, under what stan-

dard have surveillances in such cases been approved?

e. What has been

the total number of subjects under

survelllance and installations tor telephone anc

microphone surveillance requested

and approvra for

such cases for each ycar from 1966 to the present?

HT 55138 DooId:32989634

Page 81

---

## Page 82

PREI

f.

What have been the identities of the agoncies and

the Presidential appointees who have initialca

requests for warrantless electionic surveillance

in such cases from 1965 to the present?

g.

h..

i.

How many such rcquests have been initialnd by each

agency and each Presidential appointco?

How many of such icquests initiated by cach agency

and cach Presidential appointee have bech approved

by the Attorney General?

Of the total number of subjects under surveillance

in such cases for each year from 1966 to the

present, how many were (1) employees of news media

organizations; (2) current employces of the federal.

government; (3) former employces of the federal

governmcnt; (4) other?

16.

With respect to the dissemination of information obtain-

ed fron national security electronic surveillance, the

following questions are asked:

a, what hogs boon the itandords and procedures for the

dissemination ot

such information?

What have been the identitics of the agencies and

Presidential appointces who hive received informa-

tion obtained from national security electronic

surveillance for cäch year from 1966 t0 the present?

What have bech the standards and procedures for the

dissemination of such inforration to agencies ana

Presidential appointees who did not initiate the

request for the surveillance?

17.

Can additional monthly data on warrantless clectronic

surveillances prior to November 1972 be made available

in vicw of the fact that the FBI was able to preciscly

state the nunber of warcantless

electronic surveillances

in operation on ninetcen

separate days, ranging from

March 4, 1965, to March 31, 1972, in response to

230-

quest by the Select Comnittee?

(By lelter of June 9,

1975, the FBI's Office of the Director informed the

committee of the nuber of warrantloss elccironic

33136 DocId:32989634

Page

82

---

## Page 83

-7-

SECRET

surveillances in opcration on, thirty days before,

and thirty days after tostimony by the Director be-.

fore the House Appropriations Conniütee From 1965. to

the present.)

18.

In his testimony before the House Subconnittice on

courts, Civil libortics, and the Administration of

Justice, Kevin I. Maconey, Deputy Assistant Attorney

General. for the Crininal

Division, stated in reference

to a threc-man Executive Branch commission used in

Grcat Britain to review applications for national

security clectronic surveillance, "whether such a com-

mission would be

feasible under our system

think it night well be."

Is it the official position

of the Justice Department that a similar commission

composed of Executive Branch officials would be an

acceptable alternative to the prescht system for

authorizing national security electionic surveillance?

19..

In the testimony referied to above, Mr. Haroney also

stated, "I think the departnent has previously com-

mitted

• " : to complete disclosure to an over-

sight comnittee.

With respect to this statement, the

Fathering deratienn

When and in whai context has the Justice Dopart-

ment commiited

itself lo complete disclosure to an

oversight comnittee?

b. What material

or information, if any, that relates

to the authorization for, identities of the sub-

jects of, conduct of, and disscmination of infor-

mation from particular clecironic surveillances

would the Justice Department be unwilling to dis-

close to an oversight committee?

20. What is the basis for Justice Department opposition to.

the concept of a specially-designated court, composed

of one of three federal judges, which would review

applications for warrants in cases of national secu-

rity electronic surveillance?

21.

.?

In his testimony before the House Subcommittee on

Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of

Justico, Clarence. M.

Kellcy stated that he would accept

a requirement of judicial variants for national security

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 83

---

## Page 84

22.

23.

-

8

SECRET

• electronic surveillance if the standard for issuance

of the warrant was

"Jess than probable cause"

When

asked by Mr. Badillo what the appropriate standard

should be, he answored, "i think rcasonable grounds,

that as a insult of the pursuit of an investigation

(it is), possible io boliove that there has been, or

Tigence " Does this statonent rofleet the otescial

or there is a nood for the gathering of inte!-

position of the FBI in regard to (1) a varrant require-

ment for national security electronic surveillance, ana

(2) the appropriate.

standard for the issuance of a

warrant?.

What have boon the standards and procedures followed

by the Justice Department for the authorization and

conduct of national security electronic surveillance

where one (but not all) of the parties to the conver

sation consents to

the monitoring?

with respect to the July 1 white House news briefing

by pon Nessen relating to the cirect of

the. Zwezbon

• decision, the following questions are asked:

=.

What ye the naturent the careerve trom vie

Exesidont to the Attorney General, referred to by

Mx. Nessen, relating to Justice Department policy

and procedures for clectionic surveillance of

United States citizens?

b. How docs this diroctive affect Justice Depariment

policy and proccêiros for elcctronic surveillance

• of United States citizens?

C.

will the Justice Department support legislative

proposals that would require a court order for any

electronic surveillance, as was indicated by.

Mr. Nessen's statement?

d. If the answer to "c" above is yes, which of the

pending bills in Congress, if any, would the

Justice Department be willing to support?

e. If the answer to "c" above is yes, what would the -

Justice Department consider to be

the appropriate

judicial standard for the issuance of a warrant?

f.

If the answer to "c" above is yes, what would the

Justica Department consider to be

the appropriate

court or courts to issue such warrant?

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 84

---

## Page 85

2.4..

= 9

SEURLI

With rospect to cloctionic suryeillance direcica

at

encoded, non-conversational communications conducted

in the interests of nitional security and foreign

intelligenec, the following questions are

asked:

a.

What were the total number of such surveillances

For: each year from 1966 to 1968?

D.

C.

a..

e.

f:

• 9. .

What have been the identities of the agencios and

the Presidential appointees who have initiated

requests for such surveillance for each year Exom

1966 to the present?

How many such requests have been initiated by

each agency and cach Presidential appointee for

each year from. 1906 to the present?

How many of such requests initiated by each agency

and each Presidential appointee have been approved

by the Attorney Coneral for each year from 1966 to

the prescht?

How many requests have been made by cuch agency

and

cach Presidential appointee for the continua-

each vear from 1966 tr the procent

How many of the requests made by cach agency and

each Pinsidential appointee for the continuation

of such previously approved surveillance have been

approved by the Atiorney Cenecal for cach year.

from 1965 to the present?

For. each year from 1966 to the present, how any

such surveillances have been instituted in (1) the

United Statos; (2) North Amcrica, other than the

Unjied

States; (3) South America; (4) Restorn

Europe; (5) Rastern Burope; (6) Africa; (7) the

Middle East; (8) Southcast Asia; (9) the rest of

Asia?

H

65138 •DooId: 32989634

Page 85

---

## Page 86

TSP SECRET

FURTHER DETAILS RECARDING THE

FBI'S USE OF MAIL COVERS, MAIL SURVEYS,

AND PARTICIPATION IN CIA MAIL INTERCEPTS

.. ...

Downgrade. to

Seciet Uc/Baw

60324834111

.".

IN 55138 DorTd:32989634 Page B6.

312==3 32

2355

Exempt

Eman 3057

category 2 = 3

Sa-= 01

===-ass-Fication

274-210123

ENCLOSUR

165-116395-587

---

## Page 87

TAP SECRET

Mr. Chairman, I wish to furnish the Subcommittee

additional details regarding our mail covers and surveys;

however, some of this information enters sensitive areas

involving national security, and I respectfully request it

be presented in executive session.

As I have indicated previously, the FBI's use

of mail covers and surveys as investigative techniques has been

based on fulfilling its lawfully mandated responsibilities.

The list of intelligence accomplishments resulting

from mail covers on foreign establishments alone is long,

but perhaps these examples will suffice:

In February, 1975, a member. of the military holding

a "secret" clearance obtained while in training was determined

to be in contact with a foreign establishment.

Also last February, an individual with a "secret"

• clearance employed on a missile project was in such contact.

In November,. 1974, a scientist involved in atomic

research was determined to be in such contact.

We have discovered through mail coverage on the

United Nations Mission of a communist country that a wide

range of individuals and corporations have been in contact

with an official establishment of a foreign country with

which the United States has no diplomatic relations.

The SECRET

NH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 87

---

## Page 88

TEP SECRET

With reference to our former use of mail survey

programs in which we surveyed

mail

for indicators as to whether

further processing is warranted, permit me to further explain

the seven programs which I previously outlined in public

testimony:

Of these surveys, one was established in New York

as a result of the experience gained in the investigation

of a Soviet illegal. This illegal cooperated with the FBI;

and we learned that in directing mail to his Moscow center,

he addressed it in a specific fashion and also directed it

to mail drops in Europe.

From this experience, we were able to develop a .

set of indicators which allowed us to select mail which we

felt was illegal agent mail. This, coupled with our knowledge

of known Soviet mail drops on this side of the Iron Curtain,

permitted effective screening of the mail and selection of

letters on a knowledgeable basis.

This method was proved successful when we uncovered

three such illegals and successfully neutralized their

activities. This survey was conducted between 1959 and 1966.

A second survey was based on the use of these same

indicators in examining incoming mail directed to certain areas

of New York City and other cities in an effort to detect mail

being directed to illegal agents in the United States. This

survey was conducted between 1961 and 1962.

SECRET

-2-

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 88

---

## Page 89

TRY SECRET

A third survey was based on our knowledge that

illegal agents in the United States directed communications

to Soviet bloc intelligence officers employed at the United

Nations in New York City. Again, this survey was based on

solid information that this means of communication was

utilized by the hostile intelligence service. This survey

was conducted between 1963 and 1966.

A fourth survey was conducted in the Miami, Florida,

area. It also utilized the known indicators and the known

mail drop addresses on mail being sent from the United States

to Cuba. As an example, during the period of time this program

existed in Miami, from January 2, 1963, until July 21, 1966,

60 letters were determined to contain secret ink messages

either on the letter or on the envelope.

Two other surveys were directed against mail being

sent to the United States from the People's Republic of China

and Hong Kong, as well as mail directed from the United States

to China. The coverage of mail from the People's Republic

of China and Hong Kong was initiated August 1, 1956, and was

discontinued on January 24, 1966. The coverage of mail directed

to China operated between 1964 and 1966.

The purpose of these two surveys was to acquire

information concerning Americans living in China of interest

to the intelligence agencies of the United States; to detect

AP SECRET

- 3-

1 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 89

---

## Page 90

P SECRET

efforts by the People's Republic of China to persuade scientists

of Chinese descent in the United States to return to the

People's Republic of China; to detect efforts to arrange

travel by these scientists and to learn any information they

would provide the People's Republic of China; to ascertain

identities of subscribers to and recipients of Chinese

propaganda publications; and to develop information concerning

persons of security interest in the United States who were

corresponding with persons in the People's Republic of China.

The seventh survey, conducted from 1940 to 1966,

was of mail addressed to Soviet-bloc and other embassies and

diplomatic missions of national security interest.

This program was initiated shortly before the

United States entered World War II and its vital necessity

during those perilous times seems obvious.

Following World War II, the seventh program was

concentrated against the Soviet Union and Soviet-bloc countries,

and much greater selectivity was used in screening letters

to be opened.

We were able, for example, in 1964 to detect

the fact a civilian employee of the United States Navy

offered to sell classified information to the Soviet Embassy

for $50,000.

With regard to the FBI's participation in the CIA

mail interception project, when we were offered data from

TAP SECRET

- 4 -

NH 55138 DocId: 32989631 Page 90

---

## Page 91

IP SECRET

that operation, we initially set forth four specific areas

of data which could be of value to our national security

responsibility:

1. Correspondence of a suspicious nature which

might contain double talk;

2. Correspondence indicating Soviets might be

using a hostage situation to develop sources in the United States.

3. Correspondence indicating a weakness or

dissatisfaction on the part of any Soviet in the United States.

4. Information indicating Soviet control or direction

of the Communist Party, U.S.A.

In August, 1961, we advised the CIA that we were

interested in letters in which the United States addressee

or addressor was a Government employee, working in a

sensitive industry, or an American wishing to defect to

- Russia.

In February, 1962, we established ádditional

guidelines regarding the type of letters for which we had

a requirement to help further our efforts to uncover illegals.

Knowledgeable FBI officials reviewed this data

periodically, and surveys were conducted, to assure that we

were receiving only data pertinent to our legitimate

responsibilities.

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 91

-5 -

---

## Page 92

TI

SECRET

May I conclude by saying, Mr. Chairman, that the

FBI was motivated in these matters by a genuine desire to

faithfully discharge our national security responsibilities

to detect and identify illegal foreign agents and persons

willing to serve them.

AP SECRET

= 6 -

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 92

---

## Page 93

• TO SECRET

STATEMENT FOR RECORD ON

JEK Act 6 (1) (B)

-....

......I..

soungrade to Secre

SC/Baw 60324

8/3114

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 93

ENCLOSUR

+ 61- 11-355587

---

## Page 94

TeP SECRET

JFK Act

(1) (B)

TOP SECRET

HW 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 94

---

## Page 95

IS SECRET

JEK Act 6 (1

(B)

UP SECRET

-2=

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 95

---

## Page 96

--.:

-

AH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 96

JFK

Act 6

(B)

587

---

## Page 97

:

TOP SECRET

JER Act 6(11 (B)

soungrade to secret

SaW 600524

9/2/41

He sear

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 97

---

## Page 98

STATEMENT FOR RECORD ON

FBI USE OF MAIL COVERS

=_10-11-00

WW 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 98

BRAZY 62-11l: 32 587

---

## Page 99

'.

TO

SECRET

#MDRIG

: i.

27. 10- 11=00

Legal basis for mail covers

The FBI utilizes mail covers as an investigative

technique in accordance with requirements set down by

law and the Postal Service. Procedures for obtaining

mail covers are precisely set out in the Postal Manual,

Section 861.

The legality of mail covers has been substantiated

by a number of court decisions, beginning with Mr. Justice

Field's statement in Ex parte Jackson (1877); recognition

of this view through Oliver v. United States (1957); United

States V. Costello (1958); United States V. Schwartz (1960) ;

Cohen v. United States (1967); Lustiger V. United States (1968) ;

United States V. Isaacs (1972); cert. denied 417 U.S. 976 (1974) .

History of Utilization by FBI of mail covers

The FBI has utilized mail covers allowed by the

U. S. Post Office Department and subsequently the Postal

Service as early as 1928. FBI procedures have been in

accordance with Post Office policies and procedures in

effect at a particular time.

From 1928 to 1945, Special Agents in Charge of

respective field offices were authorized to request a mail

cover from the appropriate Post Office official in their

respective territories. In 1945, the FBI policy was changed

to allow the SAls this authority only in cases involving

deserters, fugitives and escaped Federal prisoners. All

top SECRET

MH 55138 DocId:32989634 Pate 99

---

## Page 100

other cases

required FBI Headquarters approval. In 1947,.

the FBI's policy was returned to the pre-1945 rule and

SACs were again permitted to request authority from the

Post Office without approval of FBI Headquarters. In 1954,

however, regulations were instituted whereby all mail covers

were to be limited to thirty days and justified to Headquarters

prior to being requested. This policy of final determination

by FBI Headquarters is in effect today.

Current statistics of mail covers utilization by FBI

As of June 17, 1975, current mail covers requested

or in place totaled 129. They were as follows: National

security - 69; Fugitive - 59; Criminal - 1.

The number of mail covers represents a minute

fraction of the total number of investigations pending on

a daily basis.

Authorization procedures consistent with Postal regulations

The FBI follows the procedures for obtaining mail

covers set out in the Postal Manual, Section 861. Inasmuch

as the FBI fits the "law enforcement agency" definition in

the Manual, we make our requests to the Chief Postal Inspector

or the Regional Postal Inspectors in Charge, depending on

the type of mail cover requested.

No level of authorization in the requesting agency

is specified in the Postal Manual. However, as indicated

SECRET

2-

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 100

---

## Page 101

SLURE I

above, present FBI regulations require that mail cover

requests must be first cleared through FBI Headquarters

for approval.

FBI Headquarters screens the request to insure

that the mail cover can be potentially productive and that

the nature of the case is of sufficient import to justify

the technique. These decisions are made upon justification

from the field office, review by Headquarters' supervisory

personnel, with final decision resting at the Deputy Associate

Director level or above.

Benefits achieved by mail covers

Mail covers have proved to be valuable as an

investigative technique in certain investigations. For example,

mail covers have led to the identification of individuals

holding security clearances who contact hostile intelligence

services and who have provided intelligence information of

interest to the hostile foreign intelligence services.

Over the years mail covers have provided leads

which have resulted in the location of fugitives.

In

criminal cases, mail covers have provided information that

has led to the discovery of evidence of criminal violations.

Purpose of mail covers

Lawful mail covers as an investigative technique are

based on the premise that discovery of an individual's

contacts provides knowledge of the individual's actions,

ECRET

NW 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 101

---

## Page 102

TOP SECRET

as well as indicates other avenues by which knowledge of

the individual can be obtained.

Objectives, of course, vary depending on the

type of investigation involved. For example, in fugitive

cases, mail covers may be used in instances when the

fugitive's close associates or relatives are obviously

hostile or suspected of being

SO.

When official contact

by law enforcement with these persons is rebuffed or

impractical, mail covers are often useful.

In selected situations where a crime has been

committed or an attempt made to do so, mail covers can

be used to identify participants or co-conspirators and

provide leads in investigations.

In national

security matters, the insight provided

by mail covers is invaluable. The FBI's successful fulfillment

of its national security role rests largely in determining

the activities of hostile intelligence services. The mails

are obviously a means of communication which allows a

foreign intelligence service accessibility to persons or

places from which they would otherwise be prohibited by

law or where their physical presence would be suspect and

thereby negate a covert effort on their part. Knowledge of

their mail contacts can open avenues of lawful investigation

which can be most productive.

DREGRET

-

HH 55138 D0оТ0 32989634 Page 102

---

## Page 103

He SEET

SPATRENT FOR RECORD ON

B3I USE CE MARI SURVEYS.

XX

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 103

62-116395587

---

## Page 104

DAP JEGRET

The FBI has conducted seven mail survey programs

solely in the discharge of its national security responsibilities.

None has been conducted since 1966.

These surveys were instituted because of their

potential value in discharging the FBI's responsibilities

in the national security field.

These surveys were conducted to detect and identify

foreign agents who threaten this Nation's security and to

detect other persons who indicated willingness, and were

in a position, to sell out this country to hostile foreign

powers. Each survey program was carefully circumscribed

as to its scope and was conducted for specific objectives

with strict administrative controls.

These surveys involved the processing, or opening,

of mail; but they did not involve wholesale, indiscriminate

opening of mail. In these surveys we were looking for

indicators as to whether review of the correspondence might

lead to the detection of an illegal foreign agent or a

person cooperating with a hostile foreign power. Although

considerable volumes of envelopes were surveyed, the vast

majority of this mail was not further processed because it

did not contain indicators which would make it relevant to

the survey•

IMDRIG

3 Sello 542 A1m./766

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 104

---

## Page 105

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

OFT INTELIIGERICE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mc. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Ms. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

August 11, 1975

1 - Mc. E. W. Larson

+7 mOR 16

a."?

SP2ALM/116

10-11-00

Reference is made to August 5, 1975, "Request For FBI

Materials" received from the SSC.

Enclosed is a memorandum for forwarding to the Committee

At meted to yet end to as of at memora and III.

Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the nemorandum

prepared for the Committee.

Enclosures

(2) SMCLOSU

62-116395

"ESCLOSURE IN BULKE ROOST"

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: :Michael E. Shaheen, Ji.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

EWL: 1hb lhb

(9)

REC-1

1020-1642

58.6

122 SEP 2 1975

NOTE:

All material described generally under the categories

enumerated in the enclosed IHM has been recorded in detail. In

Assoc. Dir order to expedite delivery of this material today, this material

Dep. ADmis not being identified herein and a comprehensive memorandum is

Asst. Dir: being prepared separately for record purposes.

Comp. Syst. —

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com..-

Gen. Inv, ...

Ident. -

Instegtion

Intel!.

Laboratory.

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv..

Training -

Legal Coun..

Telephone Rm.

MAIL ROOM

AsSbAd: 19759631

I TELETYPE UNIT C

Page 105

---

## Page 106

62-116395

2 - Mr. J.

Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. E. W. Larson

August 11, 1975

U. S. SETATE SELECI COIMITIEE TO

STUDY GOVERUMENTAL OPBRATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

a mine fun. 1

SP-ZALM)ITG

Reference is made to "Request For FBI Materials,"

dated August 5, 1975. This comunication responds to Roman

numerals I. and III. of the request which required delivery

by Monday, August 11, 1975. A11 materials indicated for

delivery will be delivered to the SSC with this memorandun on

August II, 1975.

I. A. This request is being handled by the Department

of Justice.

B, This material will be delivered. It is noted

certain items were requested in unexcised fori.

However,

excisions were necessary in Item: 8, due to the sensitive

nature of some sources of foreign intelligence named therein.

C. and D, This material will be delivered.

III. A. B. and G. These requests deal with portions

of the Manual of Instructions and the Manual of Rules and

Regulations. This material will be delivered.

D. Items 1. through 7, will be delivered.

Item 8. Involves inspection reports of some 17 legal attache

offices and will require additional processing. We expect to

include this material in delivery scheduled for August 18, 1975.

It is noted that difficulty in this area was anticipated and

Dep. AD Ad discussed with SSG Staff Members during conference August 4, 1975.

F. Mass Media Program.

Prior correspondence

concerning this matter indicated we were unable to locate any

Ext. Affairs

control file for this program.

Pursuant to the current request,

Files & con "we are conducting extensive revier of logical files to develop

Ident.

additional information which might be responsive to the SSC

nant request. Specifically, to date, te have located memorandin

Pion. & Eval. -EWL: 1hb Ihb This document is prepared in response to yayr request and is not for kissemi

Spec. Inv.-

Training -

(8)

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedangs bu

Legal Coun..

your Committee and the content may nut be disclosed to unauthorized persoz

Telephone Rm. -

-nel

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM I

TELETYPE UNIT

37O 551-546

HN 55138 DooId:32989634

Page 106

---

## Page 107

SENATE SELECT CONMITTEE ON INTELLICENCE ACTIVITIES (SSO)

dated January 16, 1968, and February 4, 1969, which bear the

caption "Mass Medla Frogram,

" and which were recovered fron a

miscellaneous aiministrative file not connected with the program

itself. It seems apparent at this point that the Vass Media

Progran vas an informal program created at FBI Headquarters and

re have thus far been unable to locate any recorded correspond-

ence relating to the inception of the program or its termination,

as such. The above-mentioned memoranda will be delivered to the

SSC on August 11, 1975, and ve are continuing efforts to develop

additional Infornation of record concerning this program.

F., G. and H. This material will be delivered.

I. Naterial

pertaining to "IitLET."

1. By memorandum June 12, 1975, SSC was

furnished certain material relating to INt. nong this

matorial vas a memorandun, dated lovember 7, 1969, which

recormended, "Pursuant to the Director's instructions" that

"attached letters to the Fresident and the Attorney General be

approved enclosing the proposed current intelligence letter."

This is the initial correspondence reflecting approval of ILst.

No other support or underlying material vas located.

2. This request concerns an "Inspection

Report referred to in SAC letter of December 26, 1972." The

SAC lecter 15 apparently the letter to Albany and nll field

offices dated December 26, 1972, a copy of which was fumishco

to you by memorandum June 12, 1975. In a revier of this letter,

ie have been unable to detect any reference to an inspection

report; literise, a reviev of all avatlable I'LET naterial

failed to reveal any inspection report or any reference thereto,

3. le have no record of a letter from the

IBI to Congressnan les Aspin in 1973 (or ad any other time)

regarding INLET. We have located in ouc files a copy of a

Letter dated April 21,, 1373, to Vir. Aspin fron the White House.

This copy vas turnished to us as an enclosure to corcespondence

from the White House concerning INLET. Me axe currently in the

process of obtaining clearance for delivery of this material to

the ssc..

-2.

MH 55138

DocId:32989634 Page 107

---

## Page 108

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE OU INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

J. This material vill be delivered.

On the basis of information made available,

ve have been unable to identify Special Agent (or former Special

Agent) John Kunkle, who vas assigned to the Bureau's Havail

office in 1955. Upon receipt of any additional information,

ve till conduet furthor inquiry to identify this individual.

1 - The Attorney General

- 3 -

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 108

---

## Page 109

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

XJ LHM

• Memo

• Report dated -

8/11/75

Yapon & hate Select Committee. to study Govt.

Operations with Respect to Intelli-

gerice activities. Request for FBI Materials,

Originating Office:

Delivered by:

Received by:

Title: Caunsel

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

# MDRIG

ALL LIVORMATION CONTATMS!

ITARTIN IS JUNNECCIFIND

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 109

---

## Page 110

trandsca.com

..

SECRET

August 5, 1975

#MDRIG

AEL MINECES

REQUESE FOR FBI MATERIALS

I.

Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Monday, August 11, 1975:

A., The notebook or binder containing materials on the

FBI

the

legal authority and maintained in the Office of

Special Counsel.

5. Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970

previously made accessible at FBIHQ in excisea

• form; unexcised versions of the memoranda bearing

the item-number designations 8, 9, 30, 32, and 37.

C. "Foxeign Operations Policy Manual," previously

made accessible at FBIHO.

D. Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division

and the San Francisco Field Office, as currently

sanitized.

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 110

62-11-5855586

ENCLOSURE

---

## Page 111

-2-

II.

Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Friday, August 15, 1975:

A.

The following materials maintained in the so-

called "Official and Confidential" files and

designated "non-derogatory," previously examinea

by SSC staff:

1. Agreement between FBI and Secret Service;

2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3.

4.

"Black Bag" Jobs;

Expansion of FBI Foreign Intelligence

Coverage;

5.

Intelligence Coverage - Domestic and

Foreign;

6.

Directives (60) ;

B.

7. Cook, Fred

(52).

Summaries or notes on interviews conducted by

Inspection Division for July 3 Inspection for

the individuals whose names are underscored on

the

attached list (slightly expanded from previous

access

requests).

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 111

---

## Page 112

III.

Newly reguested materials; delivery requested by

Monüay, August 11, 1975:

A. All of Section 8 of the Manual of Instructions.

B. Sections 1, 6, 7H, 7J, 8I, and 14F of the Manual

of Rules and Regulations.

.C. Superseding versions of. Section 6 of the Manual

of Rules and Regulations, since January 1, 1960.

D. s The following materials referred to in memoranda

previously delivered to SSC regarding FBI

legal attaches:

•1.

Memoranda Of W. C. Sullivan of June 7: 1971,

and June 16, 1971:

2.

Memoranda of Mr. Wannall of May 27, 1971, and

May 28, 1971:

3.

Letter of Hoover to the President dated

September 21, 1970;

4.

Memorandum of w. C. Sullivan dated September

22,

1970

5.

Memorandum of Mr. Erennan dated September 21

1970;

6.

Memorandum of Mr. Child. Of May 23, 1969;

Recommendations of Dalby, Felt, and Beaver

upon the recommendation made in memorandum

of sullivan of June 7, 1971:

8.

Material pertaining to an inspection of all

FBI foreign liaison posts conducted in 1971

pursuant to instructions from Hoover to

Assistant Director Ponder in charge of

inspections.

I. Materials pertaining to the origin, operation, and

termination of the Mass Media Program implementea by

the former FBI Crime Records Division.

-

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 112

---

## Page 113

- 4 -

F. Materials pertaining to the establishment and

• functions of the FBI External Affairs Division.

G. "Guide to Indexing" and "Rules Pertaining to

the General Index"

, cited at p. 14, Volume 1,

of the Classifyina Instructor's Guide.

HI. "The Standard Sub List"

I. The following materials pertaining to Project

INLET:

+ 1.

Materials reflecting approval of the

Project on ór about November 20, 1969.

2. Inspection Report referred to in SAC letter

of December 26,.1972.

3.

Letter from FBI to Congressman Les Aspin

in 1973 regarding the Project.

J. Materials pertaining to the policies and procedures

of the FBI

for the use of FBI agents for so-called

"undercover" activity.

K.

the current address and assignment of Special Agent

Of tormer special agent) John Kunkle, who was assigned

to the

Bureau's Hawaii office in 1955.

IN 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 113

---

## Page 114

- 5 -

IV. Newly requested materials; delivery requested by

Friday, August 18, 1975:

A.

The following materials referred to in memoranda

previously delivered

to SSC regarding

• FBI Legal

Attaches:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Materials pertaining to conversations

between the President and Hoover regarding

foreign liaison operations in September

1970;

Materials pertaining to conversations between

DI. Kissinger anâ Hoover in December 1970;

Materials pertaining to communications between

the FBI and the State Department regarding

foreign

liaison operations in 1970;

Materials pertaining to a conference with the

President regarding

foreign liaison operations

in June 1971.

NN 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 114

---

## Page 115

- 6-

V.

Newly requested materials; access to screen for

delivery requested by August 18, 1975:

A. The following materials pertaining to nirs.

Claire (Anna) Chennault and Spiro I. Agnew:

1

JEK: Act 6

(1) (B)

2.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and "tele-

phone checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault

in November 1968.

3.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance ana

"telephone checks" of Vice Presidential

candidate Spiro I. Agnew in November 1968.

4. All materials summarizing the results of tech-

nical or physical surveillance, including

incidental overhearings, and "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault and

Spiro I. Aqnew

in November 1969, but not

including "logs"

5. All materials pertaining to White House

instructions to the FBI for the handling of

the sunmary letters described in item 4 above.

6.

All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the summary letters described in

item 4 above.

7. The current addresses of the following former

Special Agents; who may have participated in the

technical or physical surveillance or "telephone

checks"

of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault or

Spiro T. Agnew:

a. Phil Claridge

b. William Jackson

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 115

---

## Page 116

detecto

- 7-

B.

The following materials pertaining to Yeoman

Charles E. Radford:

1. All materials, including'memorializations

ot oral communications, pertaining

to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, anc

termination of technical surveillances of

Yeoman Charles E. Radford from December

1971 to June 1972.

2. All materials, including menorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of

technical

surveillance of

two close personal friends of Yeoman Radfora,

one retired from the Navy, the other a State

Department employee, from January to April

3. All materials; including memorializations

of oral communications,

pertaining

to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical surveillance of

Yeoman Radfora's step-father in Oregon from

February to April 1972.

4. All materials summarizing the results of the

technical surveillances described in items I

through

3 above.

5.

A11

materials pertaining to actions taken by

the white House as a result of information

contained in the summary described in item 4

above.

C. With respect to surreptitious entries carried out

by the FBI from January 1, 1960 to the present, all

materials pertaining to the following:

1.

The date, place, target, and purpose of each

entry;

2.

3.

The request and authorization for each entry

including the identities of the agencies

and/or individuals who requested and/or

authorized the entry;

The procedures and methods used for the

conduct of each entry;

55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 116

---

## Page 117

-8-

4.

5.

The results of each entry, including the

information obtained and, the identities of

the agencies and/or individuals to whom the

information was disseminated.

The materials in I through 4 above which may

pertain to any surreptitious entry directed

at the following targets:

JEK Act

6 (1) (B)

NW 55138

c. Daniel Ellsberg, Mill Valley, California (1973,1974

d. Gerald Lefcourt, New York City (1970, 1971)

e. Charles Garry, Oakland, California (1970: 1971)

£. Egbal Ahmea, Chicago (1970)

9. United States Servicemen's Fund, Boston (1971)

h. NAACP Legal Defense Fund, New York City (1971)

i. Marvin Kalo, CBS News (1972, 1973)

j. Dan Rather, CBS iews (1972, 1973)

k. S01 Linowitz (1972)

1. Institute of Policy Studies, Washington,D.C. (1971:

I. Michael Kennedy, San Franciso (1969, 1970)

Radical Education Project and SDS, Ann Arbor, Michir:

(1969)

o. Carol Wild Scott, Gainsville, Florida (1972)

p. Henry di Suvero, New York City (1972)

9. The Washington Free Press, Washington, D.C. (1969)

I. The home of a "known bigot... (who) might. (have

been) plotting violence against Jewish leaders,"

referred to in Jack Anderson's

column in the

Washington Post of June 21, 1975.

DocId: 32989634 Page 117

---

## Page 118

- 9 -

D. Materials pertaining to any jurisdictional agree-

ments, agreements of coordination, or other agree-

ments between the

FEI and any other federal, state

or local agency with regard to the conduct of and

dissemination of information from surreptitious

entries.

2. The following materials pertaining to NSA watch list

• activity, reportedly in operation from late 1967

through 1973; which involved the monitoring of

international conmunications that were addressed

to, or from, or included the names of persons on

a changing

• "watch list"

1. All materials pertaining to the proposing,

approving, putting names on, executing,

evaluating, or terninating the watch list

activity;

2.

All materials (including correspondence)

sent

by the FBI to the National Security Agency or

any

other entity in the Department of Defense

listing names for the watch list or otherwise

commenting on the activity;

3.

Any internal FBI materials produced as part of

the activity;

4.

Any NSA Or Department of Defense materials

(including correspondence and reports) regard-

ing the watch list activity sent to the FBI.

F.

Materials pertaining to the authorization for FBI

contacts with: dissemination of FBI information to,

receipt of information from, and requests by the

FRI for action by the Special Services Staff of

the Internal Revenue Service.

G. "The Handbook of Technical Equipment".

#. Materials pertaining to FBI activity with respect to

the National Invironmental Teach-In (also known as

"Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

I. Materials pertaining to the origin and implication of

any decision to gather intelligence on "Women's

Liberation" in the Philadelphia FBI field office

IH 55138 DocId: 32989E7bm PH95gl1Eo the present.

---

## Page 119

- 10 -

J. The additional SAC letters and memoranda identified

on the attached list.

K.

The performance ratings (Form FD 185) of the

following current or former FBI employees:

1. George Berley

2. Wilfred Bergeron

• 3. William D. Campbell

4. Richard Suter

5. William

Tucker

6.

Terry O'Connor

7. Joseph English

I. The current office assignment or last known address

of the individuals listed in k. above.

-

HN 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 119

---

## Page 120

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO,: +

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term.

If a document was made available

for review but not transmitted, so

* DOCUMENT

BRIEFING INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/11/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

4.

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee,

testifier and subject)

Memorandun and enclosures

RESPONSE

To (list date and item

number if in

response to formal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION

state verbal request of (name), initiative,

OF

subpoena, etc.)

INFORMATION

(enter

U,

C,

S,

TS or

Codeword)

S3G letter 8/5/75, Part I, A thru C, Part III,

A thru R (apapt D, 8)

7.

WORDS

the appropriate key words

emphasis)

list provided

separately; if key words not listed

Intelligence activitles, foreign

Operating procedures

1:.

10-1t.00

SP2ALM/16

SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970; Foreign Operations

Polley Manual; Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division and

the San Francisco Fiold Office; Various Soctions of Manualoof Instruccions

and manuer of mules and Regulations and superseding versions of Section

6 of Manual of Rules and Regulations since 1/1/60; Varioas momoranda

regarding FBI legal attaches during years 1969, 1970 and 1971; Materials

pertaining to the establishnent and functions of the FBI External

Affairs Division; "Guide to Indexing" and Rules Fertaining to the General

Indes"; "The Standard Sub List"; Materials pertaining to the policies

and procedures of the FBI for the use of & FBI agents for so-called

"undercover" activity.

62-116395

YELLOW

5-W00/6

FMK: Emk

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

3791(6-75)

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

HH 55138 DooId: 32989634

Page 120

---

## Page 121

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

=.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

• 10

NH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 121

---

## Page 122

2 - MI

(1

A. Mintz

J.

B. Hotis)

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

August 3,

- Nx. W. R.

1975

1

- MI.

W.

0. Cregar

Wanna1l 4

1 - MX.

K. A. Mendenhall

#mOR16

UNÍTED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ME, "!?

OY INTELLIGINCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

5. 10-11-00

SP 2Am|62

July

28,

Reference is made to a request iron the SSC dated

1975, entitled "Superceding Request for FBI Materials.

Item V. G of this request pertained to four individuals

mentioned in a letter to the Office of the Deputy Attorney

General dated July 1, 1915, which letter requested certain

docurents and other information Iron the FBI concerning

21122.

Cointelpro acilvicles directed against these four individuall

Attached for your approval and forvarding to SSC

• is an criginal of a demorandum vhich responds to iten V. G

of the July 28, 1975, request fron the ssC.

ENCL

A copy of the senorandun is being furnished §os

your records.

It should be noted the ssc letter dated July 1, 107

7/5

requested the identity of FBI personnel connected vich

operations relating to the four individuals of interest

3925-73

and indicated interviers would be sought nith all TBI

parsonnol so involved. Deparinent renorandun dated

CEORY

July 8, 1975,

from K.

Willian O'Connor to JOhn A. Mints

of the

FBI advised interviews of any FEI Agent personnel

with respect to the above would ba an "abuse intervier."

set torch in the enclosed memorandum are the identitios

S.

FDI parsonnel which mere requested in the July 1,

1975,

hilli

Ring Joe

Enclosures

CLOSURE)

REC-1

ls-l1le

3 25 58-

110395

9X103

Assoc. Dir..

ME SEP 2 1975

Dep. AD Adm

Dep. AD inn? D

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. _

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

- The Deputy Attorney

General

Attention.

Michael E. Shaheen,

etro

Special Counsel for

Intelligence

Caordination

100-450364

(M. Starsky)

1 - 100-452984 (M. White) l

100-398576

(E. Sell)

1 - 100-181841 (II. Shockey)

-

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. -

KAM: Im

(13)

Training

Legal Coun..

Telephone Rm..

Director p

197

TROOM

Dắc Id

32989631

pers

MELETYPE UNIT

Page

122

SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHED

Veri

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

V

---

## Page 123

62-116895

D::: 16=11-00

2 - MT. J. A. Hintz

#MORIG

(I-J.B.Hotis)

1 - Hr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

SP2 ALm 1116. 1 - Mr: K. A. Mendenhall

August B, 1073

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Reference is made to SSC request dated July 28, 1975,

entitled "Superceding Request for FBI Hnterial."

Item V, ty

on page iive ot this request pertained to material relating

to Morris Starsky, Evelyn Rose Sell, Maude Adams Phite, and

Martha L. Shockey, which unterial had previoualy been requested

12 sse letter cated duly l, 1315, The duly 1, 1915, Sse

Letter had requested certain documents and other 1010IXZt1O1

from the FBI concerning Cointelpro activities directed against

Morris Starsky, Evelyn Rose Sell, and Maude Adans White.

The

letter also requested certain documents and

outer information concerning alleged cointelpro-type activities

directed against Martha I. Shockey.

Item A oi the July 1, 1975, letter requested all

documentary materials of the FBi pertaining to the authorization

and implenentation of operations concerning the four individuals

named above. Since the thrust of the SSC request pertains to

Cointelpro, only those docuents pertaining to Cointolpro activ

1ties against the four individuals of interest are being provided.

Set forth below under the names of the individuals of interest

1s a liat of those documents

MORRIS STARSKY

I. SAC, Phoenix letter to the Director, FBI,

dated May 31, 1968.

2.

SAC, Phoenis, letter to the Director, FBI,

Assoc. Dir. w

dated July 1, 1968.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dap. AD Inv. -_

Asst. Dir.:

3.

SAC, Phoenix,

letter to the Director, FBI,

Admin,

dated October ly 1963.

Comp, Syst.

Ext. Affairs - ORIGINAL, AND ONE COPY TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Gen. Inv..

Ident.

Inspection - (12)

Intell. .

PLM

ENGLOST?

SEE NOTE PAGE EIGHT

Laboratory -

this document i prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi

Plan. & Eval. -

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedings by

Spec. Inv. -

your committee and the content may nut be disclosed to unauthorized person-

Training -

Legal Coun.-

get without the express approval of the FBI le 2 - 111 3

Telephone Rm. -

Sis=

Director See'y -

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

SECRET MATERIAL ATTACHI

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 123

lifi

-544

---

## Page 124

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

SAC, Phoenis, lotter to the Director, FBI

dated October &, 1968.

5. C. D. Brennan memorandum to it. W. C. Sullivan

dated October 24, 1968.

6. Director, FBI, letter to SAC, Phoenia,

dated October

25, 1968.

7. SAC, Phoenix, lotter to the Director, FBI,

dated Rasch 31, 1970.

3. SAC, Phoenix, airtel to the Director, FBI,

lated Apxi1 7, 1970.

9, Directoo, FBI, letter to SAC, Phoenie,

dated Apzil 24, 1970.

10.

SAC, Phoenix,

letter to the Director, FBI,

datod lay 12, 1970.

1].

SAC, Phoenix,

lotter to the Director, FBI,

dated June 30, 1970.

EVELYN ROSE SELE

SAC, San Antonio, letter to the Dixoctor, FbI,

dated Cetober 8,

19G0,

SAC, Detrost, letter to the Director, FBI

dated November 12, 1969.

3.

SAC,

San Antonio, letter to the Dircetor, FBI,

dated December 10, 1969.

SAC, San Antonio, letter to the Dixoctor, FDI,

dated January 13, 1970.

- 2

55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 124

---

## Page 125

U. S, SETATE SELECT COMTITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVIFIUS (OSC)

5. SAC, San Antonio, letter to the Director, FBI,

dated March 21, 1970-

MAUDE ADAMS HILITIE

1. Director, BBI, Ictiex to SAC, Washington Fiold,

dated April I1, 1059,

2. SAe, Hashington Field, letter to DzICOtOX, MoL,

cared april 23, 1000.

3. strector, F, 1, 10ttos to SAC, Wnshington Stold,

4, SAC, Washington Field, letter to the Director,

FBI, dated May 23, 1069.

I Dared D, Dotter do viC, Washington told,

G. SAC, Hashington Pield, letter to the Director,

FBI, dated July 3, 2969,

A rovicy of documents pertaining to Cointelpro and

Merthn I. Shockey failed to roveal any Inforuation that

Manthe l. Chockey los ever tho targot of any Cointelpio

notivities.

Item E of the July 1, 1975, SSC letter requeated

1. list of all investigation, crininal of other, related

directly or indirectly to the four individuals naned hercin

and an explanation of the disposition of each investigation.

During 19SS = Sclectivo Service Act investigation

ras inatituted conccinine Morris Joseph Starsky,

Investiga

tion in this natter vas institutod to dotcrnino if there wus

o violation of the counseling of ovasion section of the

Seleotive Service Áct, Information obtained during the

course of this investigation was subnitted to the United States

Attorney's Office in Phoenix, Arizona, and during April, 1909,

1t was the opinion of the United states Attorney that no

prosccutive action vas warranted in this matter and no furthex

invostigation for a possible violation of the Selective Service

Ect uns necessary.

=3=

HH 55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 125

---

## Page 126

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

During May, 1900, # Federri Housing Administration

naticio investigation was insuittied against ix starsky wies

intoration was rcceived that Mr. Starchy Und obtained a

Fedoral Ilousing Administration loan to buy a house walch

would thon be ronted.

Invostigation in this natter deterined

the house which hat been purchased by ix. Statoly was going

to be used by him and chorefore the United States Attorney's

office iu Phocnix, Arizone, declined prosecucion in this

matick during soptember, 1900.

Ar. Scorsky was also the subicct of in investigation

concerning his notivitics on bohali of the Gocialist Torkers

investigation woe

Farest state out salise 1tl Co, a tre Case

was closed in April, 1974.

In addition to being the subicot

of thas investigation, incormation pertaining to Mr. Starsky

during the above tine period vas also obtained during the

F'DI's investigation of the SIP, YSA, Student Mobilization

Conuittee to Ind the War 1a Viounan, The Connitteo to Eid

the Far in Viotnan, end the Connittee of One Thousand to

Defend Acadenic Freedom.

Information was also received con,

corning at. Starsky during an investigation pi his W¿€,

Pamela, which was being conducted as a result of her activities

with the SHp and YSA auring 1970 through 1973.

An investigation was conducted wherein Evolyn Rose

501l was the subject.

This investigation which was instituied

during 1955 devoloped information concerning her activitios

on behalt of the SVP and Y3A.

the case in which Sell was the

subject was closed during March, 107,

In addition to being

the subject of investigation, Infomation was also received

during this sane time period concerning Evelyn Sell in investi

gations of the SVP and the National Feace Action Coalition.

Additional intornation concering Scll was obtnined ns i

rosult of infornation being received concerning the Texas

Abortion Coalition Dideunil: March auxing 1971.

Maude Adans White was the subjocù ot an inveatigation

fron March, 1009, until Septembor, 1072, after information was

developed concerning her activities on behali of the she and

the ISA.

In addition, # Security of Coverument Employees

invostigation was conducted during 1960 when information was

developed that Maude Adans White was a member of the ISA and

an employee of the United States Government.

Results or tiG

investisntion rose forwardod to the Civil Servico Comcission.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 126

---

## Page 127

V. 5.

SENATE OLLECT COLITICE ON ENTUULIGRICE ACSIVITILS (500)

Marcho &. Obockey was tho subject of an investigation

during 107d nitor information vas acvoloped concering her

notivities on boinit of the yes.

tien e of cho duy 1, 1014, boo letter roquosted e

list of ril pergons cutsido the 10i

enployers, relatives, iixencs, noahe personner, nenters

of clorr, redorel, sinto, and local lay endorconent, and

other officiato, oto.) contacied in icloulon to the four

individuals naned hercin nad the purpose of thoir contact.

Iteu V, C, od the July 90,

outside the EDI sho were uillized is sources is Ecing lunnished

and infornation which would toad to identify those individuals

in tie documento botos subaltted hus been exclocd. Idchilty of

ocher individualy contected is set forth in copies of connunications

Long Surnichod cod toretoro no list no such in boing provided.

Iten D of the July 1, 1070, SC lotter requeated a

Ist of ill iDI reisouncl connectod with the operation relating

to tho four individuals nunca horcin, their speciale comucation,

and choir present location.

In this zogard it it to ke noted

each document being funishod has locatod in tho ares on tiso l0wc1

Icfi-hand cornor of tho tirot page the initialo of the Lurchu

sugorvisos or told oftico socat who dictaiod tne colzunication.

Tor tboue communications which vero dont Iron DeI Hondquartcas

(Furs) to a sicid ostice, the individuals at toild tho aro

being considered as "conncoted" with the cano vero

the caccordug

supervisory

the Section Chief, and the highest level of cuthority

who coprovod the docucut.

For concuicationd ecocived ne friLd

Iron the dield offloc the identity of the individual tho initialed

the communication for filing will be providol, the identity of those

othes individuals tho hove initialed the docucuts no rot boing

furnished as they ano considered i Intensudiato zoviewing

supervisors nod officials nod to such are noù Orcelsically

"comected" with the case.

For itose commazections which

originntod iron the field office,

the identity of the case

Agent, the dacinting Agent, and the flold superviuor who amroved

tho connuniontion for trunonitial to testy is voing zuralsued.

In

clace instances the identity o1 indivicuala lose 2n20101s Vero

vinced on the cocuscot cannot be determiaca.

Sot forth below pic

tho adontities of thoso individuclo identifica, both zi

putty end

cho scopective sield oftices, their srecitie comection, cod

prOSCRE

locatiOn.

= 5-

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 127

---

## Page 128

SINNIE SELECE CONMITZIL ON INTELZICEICE ACIIVITIES (O8C)

IBI ILADQUARIEES PERSONKEL

Erennas, Chaxtes

Retáred

407 North Orien

• Streci, Alexendria, Vo.

'Section Chiet

22304

cresciola, Louis f.

Burent Supervi30r

Grubert, Hierbert A.

DallAS

FEI Office

Durcau Supcrvicor

delington, dack

FDI Icadouartoxs

Approved docuncat 3or Dection Chief

Hoover, Johu Edgax - Deceased

Aperoving authority

Horner, Tussell Il, - Tetired

5110

Althea Deive, Annandale, Ve.

32009

Bureau Supervisor

Reucin, fobert - Lotirod

0910

Shorborn Inne, Springilold, Va.

22152

Bureau Supervisor

Stil], Trai: D.

IDI

Ileadquerters

Duecau Supcivisor

Thompson, Consud v. - Botlred

2130 Exesel Surcol, Vicana, Va.

22120

Aparoved for Section Chiel

PODIX ELI ONFICE EURSONNEL

111lings, Willian F. - Cotired

900 Rewberry, Eichardsou, Tenta

Dictating Agent

Fauver, Eax] I.

Phoenix IDI Varico

Supervisor

-G =

NH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 128

---

## Page 129

i1, i5a

SUITRL: NEUEOE COIRILUZLO CU IRELLIGRICE ACCIVIRIDO (GCO)

Iáclco, I2Ul D., J1. • PCliicd

5577 Cyolorian erivo, Cinciunati, Ohio 10911

Зретуалох

3io D cametl, Bocnt, introan 20020

carcevisor

Fotord, Toy I.

Focatx fuI Ofico

Iictoting Agcnt

Lovab, d. dagcs - touurcü

020 Chouacs, San Antoado, Icato 78210

Lapcivisor

Taylor,

Faul G. - Retired

Horth 20th Fleon, Thoends, Artzonn €001G

Dicizcing nad Gase fgeat

LSS DECTOL ETELU POI QUVICE HUESONICE:

Dalnoa, John r.

Vcchiarion racid Il1 Ciuiec

EITerYi9OI

DONDÓRCO

Dloioting end Cose ASent

SATT ANGOXIO EUI ONDICL EULSONNLA

i]. Iveis - fotized

calus toroton pozdr tintà Hollow, Charlorte,

Ilorth Cnzolina

Supcrvidor

Deadonlauga, Beman E., 35. m Lecrecy

331 Avc Mazia Diive, San

Antonio, tezas Fealo

Dictating and Case Agent

Fatrser, Jenco L.

Sta Urpacásco

2ES OifICC

Dlotating Agcnt

Woods mioato toi Orace

Supervisor

-7=

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 129

---

## Page 130

U.S. DIGININ DULICE COURTITEE DU INTILLIGENCE ACHIVITIES (OSC)

Riley, Howazad W.

CAN ANtOniO IDI OstiCe

Caso Micat

Roso, Donald I, * Rouired

030 Sheüywood Lene, San Antonio, Tezna 70216

Supervisor

DERICOIS EDI OFICE FENSONIEL

Savinaly, Lloyd E.

Las Vegas Try Oiiice

Dictating Ascat

Taclosures - 17

I - The Attorney General

NOTE:

As noted in cover letter to the Attorney General,

identities of iBI Agent personnel who were connected with the

cases on the four individuals of interest in the ssc request dated

7/1/75 are being furnished.

The 7/1/75 letter also indicated

interviews would be conducted with all FBI personnel so involved.

Serials being furnished to SSC in excised form are as

follows:

Morris J. Starsky; 100-449698-35-1, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14,

15, 16 and 100-449698-543.

Maude Adans White; 100-452981-3, 4, 5, 6.

Evelyn Sell; 100-449698-25-66, 69, 70; 100-449698-889

and 100-398576-33.

Documents being furnished relating to White and Sell

have previously been released in the SHP lawsuit. Documents being

furnished relating to Starsky have previously been released in

the SVP lavsuit and in a request by Starsky under the Freedom of

Information Act with the exception serials 100-449698-543 and

100-449698-38-6. These two serials vere reviewed with Assistant

U. S. Attorney, Southern District of New York, who felt SVP and

YSA were not entitled to them.

-3*

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 130

---

## Page 131

2--..

..--

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee: -

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

[X LHM

Memo Report dated_ 8/8/75

Caption of Document

senate Select Committee. 7/28/75 reques

; Item V,G; Item A of 7/1/75; Item B of 7/1/75;

450

8/8/75

1; 1aylor, = Date: -

Received by:

office Thes

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

10-11-00 SP.2 AMLATE

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

131

---

## Page 132

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO: Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term.

If a document was made available

for review but

not transmitted, so

note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

I TESTIMONY / OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/8/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term;

add specific names if appropriate).

sSC

HSC

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; bive name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Heworandum and enclosures

5. WNS?

date and, 1tem

response

to formal request, other-

SSC letter 7/1/75 and 7/28/75, Part V, Itan G

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C,

Codeword)

7. KEY WORDS

appropriate key words from

the list provided separately;

Counterintelligence

Intelligence collection

ATT"

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this

it em)

Certain documents and other infornation concerning alleged

Cointelpro-type actlvities directed against four

Individuals.

62-126395

EMK: frak

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL, COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECIION WITH SENSTUDY 75

AD YELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379| (6-75)

HH 55138

DocId: 32989631 Page 132

---

## Page 133

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

"FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments

made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

..

1H 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

133

---

## Page 134

The Attorney General

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr.

1

W. R. Wannall

Mr. W. O. Cregar

August 18, 19751

584%-

Mr. S. F. Phillips

Director, Fi

ril

REC-10 1

U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(SSC)

Mr. Michael E. Shaheen, Jr., Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination, Office of the Deputy Attorney

General, V. S. Departrent of Justice, Washington, D. G.,

has asked

for comments of this Bureau concerning

a letter

addressed to him by ur. John T. 11ill, Director, Domestic

Intelligence task force, sse, and dated August 7, 1975.

Enclosed is a nenorandun for forwarding to the

SSC which sets forth an analysis of the problen involved

and the position which this Bureau is taking in this matter.

A copy of this menoraneum is also enclosed for your records.

Enclosures

(2)

62-110395

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Spacial Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

"i""

#MDe16

ONE SEANIE

nat delinerato

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection -

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. &'Eval. _

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Cour. -

Telephone Rm. -

MAIL ROOM L

184F B 8021978989634

5=

TELETYPE UNIT

Page 134

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 135

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

. - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

August 18, 1975

62m130395

#MDR16

ITTE

SP-Z ALMI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACIIVIIIES (SSC)

RE :

REQUEST FERTAINING TO

ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

16-iL-00

Reference is made to letter dated August 7, 1975,

from John T. Ellift, Director, Donestic Intelligence

Task

Force, SSC,

to Michaol S. Shaheon, Jr., Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination, Office of the Deputy Attornoy

Goneral, U. S, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.,

which states as

follous:

"With reference to the matter

discussed in ny letter yesterday concerning

the Atlantic City materials, I would

appreciate it if you would examine the

serios of menoranda fron. Mr. Daloach to

Mire Jankins

(Tab I) and give no jour

personal

assurance. that there are not

included therain any portions which

summarize or describe any overhearings

obtained as a result of any electionic

surveillance directed at Dr. King and/or

meniors of his family.

*We nill cuait your roply

before firthor exanining these materials."

for purposes ol clarity and bettor understanding,

Dep. ADAd. thOrD follows a sumaary of the correspondence involved.

Comp. Sai: _STP/STA: amt dis

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. _

Gen. inv. _

Ident. _

ORIGINAL AND ONE TO ATTORNEY GENERAL

Inspection

Intell.

PEM

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

This document is prepared in

Spoc. Inv. -

Training

nation outside uner commit do now noet art is not for disemin

Its use is limited to official proceedings by

your committee and the content may nut be disclosed to unauthorized verson-

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. =

nel without the express approval of the FBI

Director Sec'y _

MAIL ROOM I

TELETYPE UNIT

ENCLOSURE

62.11395

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 135

L

569-920

---

## Page 136

RE:

REQUEST PEETAINING TO

CLECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE

SSC lottor May 11, 1975, With attached appendicos,

roquested cortain documents and othor information from tho

FBI. Appondix D of this letter captioned "Roquest Portnining

Appondix D, Iton 7, requests all monoranda and

other matorials which; (2) rolate to intelligenco activities

at or in connection with the Democratic National Convontion (DNC)

at AtLantic CITy, Now jersey, in August, 150% and (o) relate to

clectronio survoillances oi telephones and/or premisos at

2471 Atlantic Avenue and/or Clairidge Hotol in Atlantic City,

Now Jorsoy, during August, 1061,

Appondix D, Item 8, requests Conmittec stuff accoss

to all memoranda

and other materials roflecting the identities

of porsons monitored, the contents of conversations

nonitored, and/or any information obtainod fron conversations

monitored

on the surveillances described in 7(1) above.

Appendix D, Iten 16, rcquests all nemoranda and

othor matcrils containing the rosults of any aduinistrative or

othor inquiry undortalon by the FDI no n rosuli of and/or rolating

to the allegations contained in the January 26, 1975, issue oi

The Washington Post concerning activities of the FBI

Atlantic City, New Jorsey, in August, 1964.

The FBI's responso to the above is containca in a

nomorandun dated July 15, 1975, and its attached exhibits

(tabs) A through I.

--

-

~ By the very naturo of the title of Appendix D

- 'Request Pertaining to Plectronic Surveillanco," and the

language used in the specitle requests in Itens

7 and 8,

it is obvious

we are dealing with naterial which is substan-

tially in the area of olectronic surveillances and falling

within the language of Ic. Elliff's inquiry whore he refors

to, "any portions which sunmarize or describe any ovorhearings

obtained as a rosult of any olectronic survoillanco directed

at Dr. King and/or nonbers of his fonily."

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 136

---

## Page 137

RE;

REQUEST PERTAINING TO

ELECTRONIC SURVEILIANCE

As will be illustrated by tho following resume and

cramples, the FBI can givo no assurances of the nature boing

requested by the SSc of the Justice Department.

Dy comparing intormation in the Doloach menoranda

(Exhabit/Tab K) with actual logs of ovorhears on King's

tolephone during the DNC, it was determined that sone of

the information in the Delorch monoranda cano fron

electronic surveillance os King and that, while we cannot

dotorine the preciso souccos for a majority of the information,

there is logical belief that much additional information in

these memoranda also came from clectronic survoillanco of

King The following are oxamplos:

(1) Deloach memorandum to Ir. Jenkins dated

August 25, 1964, (which bears a side heading on page one

regarding fartin Luther King), page one, paragraph two

which concerns a call received by King fron Bayard Rustin

in which king stated he was very encouraged by the way

things were going and there had been no demonstrations by

the Mississippi Treedon Democratic Party (MFDP) .

(2) Dolorch tonorandum to Ir, Jenkins datod

August 25, 1964, (which bears a side heading on page three

rogarding

Martin Luther King) page throe, paragraphs ono

through three which concern a call fron a monber of King's

stait to a hirs. Jackson regarding arrangoments for hor to

cone to the Atlantic City area; a call from John Sutton

of tho California delegation asking King to ucet with

Calatornin dologates; and intornation indicating that lie

loaders had asked king to call rovornora ol two statos in

an attempt to enlist thoir support.

(3) Deloach menorandum to Alr. Jenkins dated

August 20,196%, (53x pages in length) pagos thrce and tour,

which concern a contact with king by Dick Gregory to discuss

convontion ovents including MEDP.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 137

---

## Page 138

RE: REQUEST PERTAINING TO

DLECIRONIC SURVEILLANCE

(1) DeLoach memorandum to Ax. Jenkins dated

August 26, 1964, (which bears a sido heading on page two

rogarding

Martin Luther king) pago two, paragraphs throe

through six and page three, paragraph one which concern

convorsations by Rustin regarding MFDD delegates, a call

by Fustin to a copresentativo of tho National Council oi

Churches and whether or not there would be a streot

demonstration on that dato.

In addition to Exhibit K, the FBI memorandun dated

July 15, 1975, and its other exhibits, which portain to fBI

coverage during tho DiC at Atlantic City wore similarly

roviowed to dotcinine if any portions summaricod or describod

ovorhoars obtainod as a rosult of olcctronic survoillanco of

King+

The below outllhod portions woro determined to contain

information from such type coverage:

(1) IBI nomorandum dated July 15, 1975, pago

soyen, paragraph live nade brief roicrences

• to typo of

information received fron King technical surveillance

regarding the NEDP.

(2) Exhibit G, pages three and four, itons ono

provided hour-to-hour strategy followed by king and others

nnd roferred

to intomation roceived regarding the MEDP.

(3) Exhibit Il, pagos four and livo, refor to

rosults of technical surveillance of King.

(1) Exhibit J, pago one, paragrapa tarce, reicks

to results of technical coverage oi king.

upon rustin to come to atlantic City that day, and that

King had aticmpted to arrange a rendezvous with hrs. Jackson

in Philadolphia.

1 - The Attorney General

→ 4 to

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 138

---

## Page 139

JOIR O- TOCHURE TEXAS, VICE

VICE

MAN

PHILIP A. MART, MICH.

HOWARD H. LIKER, JR., TENN.

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN.

BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.

WALTERED, HUNDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MD.

RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, PA.

GARY HART, COLO,

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

FREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ, JR., CHIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

Linited States Benate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RES, 21, 84TH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

August 7, 1975

#MDRIG

senstudy

Michael E. 'Shaheen, JK. Esge

Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20530

Dear Mike:

With reference to the matter discussed in my

letter yesterday concerning the Atlantic City materials,

give me your personal assurance that there are not inclua

ed therein any portions which summarize or describe ady

overhearings obtained as a result of any electronic sur-

veillance directed at Dr. King and/or members of his

family.

We will await your reply before further examin-

ing these materials."

Sincerely,

CC DALE

SFP/STA: dont

John T. Elliff

Director

Domestic Intelligence

102-1163

58:4X

RO FEB I7 1976

55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 139

---

## Page 140

Transmit the following in

10 ROOT

Via

it 1

•Date: 8/7/75

Tyre i plaintead or coile:

AIRMAIL

TO:

DIRACIOR,

FBI (62-116395)

FROM:

SAC, LOS ANGELES (66-6243) (E)

10-11-00

SUBJECT:

U. s.

= SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGINCE ACTIVITIES (SSC);

INTERVIEW OF SUPERVISOR RICHARD H. BLOESER

BX SSC MEMBER

Re Bureau teletype to Los Angeles dated 7/31/75,

captionea SeNSTUDY 75.

Enclosed herewith for the Bureau are the originel

-and seven copies of i letterhead memorandum concerning the

above interview.

4067

De-a14

Astic + H

/

RECT 6 3-

1io59s

::1.584

Bux.0÷ (503.

1::

ENCLOSURE

02 AUG 14-1975

apr/jor

7 9 SEP ^ 7 1975

DE.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 110-

---

## Page 141

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

In Reply, Please Refer 10

File No.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Los Angeles, California

August 7, 1975

#MORIG

AUL INCORI! THOS CONTAINED

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) ;

INTERVIEW OF SUPERVISOR RICHARD H. BLOESER

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

On August-5,1975, Supervisor Richard H. Bloeser

was interviewed by SSC

Staff Member Lester Seidel at the

Los Angeles FBI Office regarding the COINTELPRO/Black Panther

Party (BPP).

Mr. Seidel advised Supervisor Bloeser that the

interview was voluntary, but did not advise Supervisor

Bloeser of his rights in this matter.

Mr.

Seidel inquired of

Supervisor Bloeser as to

how many offices he had served in, his length of service in

the Bureau, and how long had been spent on intelligence

investigations.

Supervisor Bloeser replied that he had

served in Philadelphia, El Paso and Los Angeles, had been.

in the Bureau approximately 24% years, and had been assigned

to intelligence work for 22 years.

Mr. Seidel inquired as to whether Supervisor Bloeser

believed that the Bureau had placed undue pressure on the

field to come up with counter intelligence proposals concerning

the BPP and was it difficult to come up. with a proposal.

Supervisor Bloeser responded that there was no undue pressure

I placed of the field by the Bureau, that the COINTELPRO/BPP

was merely another case assigned

. to an agent and that agent,

as in any other case, had the responsibility of handling the

matter whether it concened the solving of a case of the

submission of proposals. Mr. Seidel was also informed that

and it ition to

it was not unduly difficult to come up with a proposal and that

a number of proposals were rejected at the field level and

never submitted to the Bureau.

Mr. Seidel inquired specifically as to counter

intelligence proposals involving cartoons ridiculing the BPP.

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions

of the FBI.

It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to

your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed

outside your agency.

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page- 141

'ENCLOSURE

+02-116395-584

---

## Page 142

-

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) ;

INTERVIEW OF SUPERVISOR RICHARD H. BLOESER

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER •

Supervisor Bloeser responded that he vaguely remembered such

proposals but without reviewing the file had no definite

recollection. Mr. Seidel did not request that the file be

reviewed.

Mr. Seidel inquired specifically about a business

card which allegedly

had been

prepared by the Bureau bearing

the phrase "Kazenga is impotent."

Mr. Seidel requested

Supervisor Bloeser's views on the distribution of this card

by the FBI. Supervisor Bloeser responded that he vaguely

remembered the card, that he thought it was humorous, and

that the word impotent had various meanings.

Mr. Seidel then inquired about the blood feud

which existed in the past between the US Organization and

the BPP and the efforts of the Bureau to keep this feud

alive and thus promote violence. He specifically inquired

any counter intelligence proposals which, if placed in

Supervisor Bloeser responded first that personally

he had no apologies for the counter intelligence program as

a whole, that proposals submitted six or seven years ago

were believed necessary at that time due to the circumstances,

specifically that at that time the BPP and the US Organization

were invölved in violent activity against the community as a

Mr. Seidel was informed that the feud between the US

Organization and the BPP occurred long before the FBI

COINTELPRO became involved in the feud and that any proposals

approved by the Bureau had relatively little effect on the

violence committed by either group.

Mr. Seidel was also

reminded that. six or seven years ago the Congress of the

United States fully supported the war in Vietnam in which

thousands of people were killed but that under todays

circumstances no support has been given to South Vietnam.

2

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 142

---

## Page 143

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC):

INTERVIEW OF SUPERVISOR RICHARD H. BLOESER

BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

Mr. Seidel then posed a hypothetical question

involving

the following factors:

would Supervisor Bloeser

now or in the past approve a counter intelligence proposal

whereby one extremist with a criminal record of violence

be anonymously informed that another extremist with a

record of criminal violence was an informant for the FBI,

knowing that the alleged informant might be injured or

killed.

Supervisor Bloeser replied that under the present

conaitions such a proposal would not be approved, but

that he could not give an answer as to what his

feelings

might have been six or seven years ago under any given

situation.

Mr. Seidel was again reminded that Congress

in the past has not hesitated to support wars which kill

thousands of people but that recently they have critiseed

the CIA for allegedly plotting to assassinate one individual

whose death might prevent a war. Mr. Seidel was also informed

that it was ironic that Congress was investigating

another

agency of the Federal Government which was attempting to

prevent revolutionary violence in this country.

MI.

Seidel then inquired into the counter

intelligence proposals approved by the Bureau in relation

to the actress Jean

Seberg and Raymond Hewitt, a leader

of the BPP.

This proposal concerned the fact that Seberg,

who was then married to a French producer, admitted being

pregnant by Hewitt who was also married at the time. The

Bureau arproved anonymously leaking this information to a

Hollywood columnist.

Mr. Seidel inquired as to whether

Supervisor Bloeser did or did not believe that this was an

-- invasion of privacy. Supervisor Bloeser responded that the

item was news worthy and that it.would have been any fair game

for any newsmen had they come across it in the course of their

business which they could have probably

certainly congress would not have exitised fly done, and that

a newspaper fox

printing such an item or claim it to be an ivasion of privacy.

• Mr. Seidel inquired as to the purpose of.

this particular

operation and he was informed that Miss

Seberg was giving

support to the BPP and that it was hoped that such publicity

would prevent any future support by her of the BPP.

3

HN 55138 DocId:32989634 Page

_143

---

## Page 144

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON.

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC) ;

INTERVIEW OF SUPERVISOR RICHARD H.. BLOESER

BY •SSC STAFE MEMBER

He was further advised that it was the responsibility of the

FBI to determine who was funding revolutionary groups in this

country.

Mr. Seidel then inquired as to whether or not it

was difficult to conduct intelligence investigations under

present statutes and under the Criminal Rules of Procedure.

He was informed that it was somewhat difficult to conduct an

effective intelligence operation under present circumstances

and that perhaps new legislative or executive orders would be

helpful to the FBI in order to allow the FBI to continue its

investigations in the Domestic Intelligence field. Mr. Seidel

inquired as to whether it would be helpful to have specific

legislation which might completely separate criminal and

intelligence operations so one would not taint the other.

He was informed that if such legislation could be enacted

that it would undoubtedly help the FBI.'

The interview lasted approximately two hours and

it was not necessary to consult with

another Bureau

representative during this time.

-

4*

CHH 55138 DocId: 32989634

Pagé.

144

---

## Page 145

The Attorney General

1

2

MIo

B. Adans

Mr. J.

A. Mintz

(1 - Mr.

J. B. Hotis)

I - Mr.

W. R.

wannald

128205 1, 491

1 - Mr. #. O. Cregar

Director, FBI

EMD216

U.

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

5, 508:

10|27/00 LSPLALNHIG

Deference is made to July 28, 1985,

superseding

request for FBI materials received on that date Iron the sSc.

mittes. all en Aug,1,1975

Enclosed is a menorandun for forwarding to the

Cormittee which responds to the requests contained in Categories.

I through IV on which a deadline for compliance was set for

August 1, 1975. As noted in the enclosed nemoranaum, Categories

Tand VI

of the request were designated for conpliance by

August 8, 1975; these latter categories are receiving continuing &

actention and you will be advised of compliance at the earliest

possible tine.

Also enclosed for your records is a copy os the

nenorandum prepared for the Connittee.

Enclosures (2)

1133

62-116395

REC-1

1 - The Deputy Attorney Ceneral

Attention:

lichael E. Shaheen,

Jr.

13 - ENCLOSURE

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

EWLinjgrn

(9)

J2 SEP 2 1975

+3253058960883

Dole

"ENCLOSYRE IN

BULKY ROO

NOTE:

ENOL BEFIND FLE

Per

The 7/25/75, request is the first received under the new

procedures which were placed in effect on 7/24/75.

These provisions,

in effect, require compliance by a date designated by the Committee.

noted in our letterhead memorandum to the Committee, we have

mplied with Categories I through IV.

All material described

whether for delivery to the committee or

access for serening at reLie, has been recorded in detail.

#comprehensive memorandum is being prepared for record purposes.

-ALSO, exact

purpose upon approval of the attached LEM by the AG.

Arrangeneats

for representative of the Legal Counsel Division

_to deliver thig memorandum as well as the materials designated for

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 146

1197100410816

CLASSIFIED BY SP-2 ALMITE

DECLASSIFY ON: 25X

SECRET

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. 0.

A. Hintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

I - Mr. W. R. Wannall

GR-710305

fugust 1, 1975

1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

U. B. SPIATE SELECT COTIITTEE

TO STUDY COVERILIEITIAL OPIRATIOIS

VIITIL CESPICE TO INTILLIGENCE ACFIVITIES (CSC)

ADL INTORMATION CONTAINS

FEREIN IS UNGLASSITID AL

WHERE SHOKA

Reference in nade to the superseding request do: IDI

naterials dated July 20, 1975, which 7a5 received on that date

izoa Conuitteo Stali Deprescatatives John T. EllilS and

Hark Citenstein.

This request provides for access to or

delivery of naterials in six categories, I through VI.

During a conterence held on July 20, 1075, attendod

by lossrs. Elliff and Citonstein with reprosentatives iron the

Doparinont of Justico and the IDI, certaia nodilications of

the original list vero agreed upon. Also, by lector to tho

Cosalideo fron the Attorney General on July 20, 1975, other

notifications/exceptions to the list wero stipulaied.

Tollowing is an accounting, by category and for each

spectic iten therein,

of the status of each request in

Categozies I through IV which were designated for conpliance

by Lugust 1,

2975.

In ardor to base chia responso as couplodo

as possible, each requesi is being identified and any

nodification oz exception noted were applicable.

Y and VI were designated for coupliance by

1970, and you will be advised concerning the status

thio naterial by separate communication as soon as possible.

I.

Iberials to which the Connittee staff has been i2vcn

accass; dolivery requested by Iriday, August 1,

1975:

A. FBI Illo #100-00

Assoc. Dir..

D. IDI Inspectios Guldelines

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

C. Index to all 31C lenoranda and SAC lettero

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. -

D. Peteroca Connitice Report on COIITNPLIRO

Ext. Affairst

Files & Com."

Gen. Inv..

ident.

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

Inspectio

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

(8)

This document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi-

Spoc. Inv. -

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedings by

Training

your Cormuttee and the content may nut be disclosed to unauthorized person-

Legal Coun.

nel without the express approval of the FBl

Telephone Rm. _

Director See'y _

MAIL ROOM DO

* TELETYPE UNIT L

ENCLOSURE,

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 146

11739556-420-58020

---

## Page 147

= =

U. S. Senate Select Committce

an espot to ental rene detavaties (s5C)

F. All superseding sections of the FDI Hanual of

instructions proviously made accessible at FBInQ.

G. Titles and nunber of FBI Field Office Agents.

H, FBI Forus previously made accessible at FBIal.

Processing of the above materiol has been completed

and will be delivered to the Committee on August 1, 1075, with

this communication.

II, Outstanding proviously requested materials; delivery requested

by Friday, August 1, 1975:

A. Requests immediate and continuous delivery/access

to underlying materials to designate COINILLPIO operations.

Requested naterial

in this regard is currently and will on a

continuing basis, ve made available.

Refers to underlying materials pertaining to mail

covoro as specified in Jr. K. Willian O'Conor's letter to the

SoC, Domestic Intelligence Task Force, dated July 15, 1975.

Lospousive material in this regard furnished with this

communication vas compiled from a roview of Bureau files based

on a list received from the Post Office Doparinent contoining

inactive noil covers which have been opernted by the Post Oifice

ad the request of this Lureau dating back to 1971.

Additionally,

In rosponse to request contained in SSC letter of

May 14, 1975,

Appendix D, part one,

iten 4a, k, there is attached material

relating to the decision, policies and procedures maintained by

this Durezu recarding mail covers.

- 2-

17a9035

IT 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 147

---

## Page 148

U. S, Senate Select Committee

To Study Governmental Operations

With Respect to Intelligence Activities (SSC)

c.

Refers to materials relating to the "Fuston Plan."

Responsive material to this request has been prepared by this

Bureau and has been furnished to the White House awaiting

approval for transferral to the SSC.

D.

Potors to material relating to ill teruination ir

1906 of investigative techniques mentioned in President Nixon's

statenent of May 22, 1973. This Bureau's reply to this request

is contained in our

memorandum to the SSC, dated July 16, 1975.

E.

Natorials pertaining to nail surveillance.

Dy

letter to the committee vuly 29, 1975, the Attorney General

designated this requested naterial as extraordinarily sensitive

and

advised that access to this material shall be governed by

special procedures.

Requests specified material contained in Section 8

of the Manual of Instructions and Sections 10 and 12 of the

llanual of Rules and Regulations.

Requested material in this

regard

is being delivered to the SSC with this communication.

G.

fefers to specified communications directed to

field offices from FBI Headquarters.

Responsive material to

this request was furnished to the Committee by Bureau nemorandum

dated July 30,

1975.

directed against Black Panther Party in the California arez.

no are to

Refers to naterial relating to COINTELPRO operations

According to agrecent on July 29, 1975, this material v111

be prepared to reach the sSC by August 3, 1075.

III.

Outstanding previously requested materials; access to

screen for delivery requested by Friday, August 1, 1975:

Ano

Materials relating to Joseph Kraft,

By letter

July 29,

1975, the Attorney General advised the SSC that access

to the Kraft material would be delayed due to need to confer

with Krait's attorney.

B and C.

Material contained in the so-called "Olfioial

, Confidential" files which do not contain derogatory information

(B); and which do contain derogatory information (C). Access

- 3 =

WH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 148

2290016 i

---

## Page 149

im.,

U.

S. Senate Select Committeo

To study Covornnontal Opcrations

With Respect to Intelligence Activities (BSC)

to material relating to both (B) and (C) was givon to SSC

Staff Meabor Wark Citenstein at FDI Headquartors connencing

July 31, 1075.

The review of this materinl is being made in

the prosence of 3A lugh Halled of IDI Headguariors in accordance

vich agrood procodures.

D.

Matorials pertaining to the Attorney CenornI's

tostimony on February 27, 1075, regarding "types of abuse for

Wich the Lureau has been susceptible in the past." This

material is available for roview.

I..

SAC Letteis and lenoranda. This naterial is

available cor review.

F.

Material pertaining to surveillance at Democratic

nolantic City, ley versey, 1904, 111

nemorandum July 15,

Icezonal Coaventiol 1975, delivered to SSC on August 1, 1975,

furnished this naterial.

It is recognized that excisions appear

in thio material which

are beyond those under current agreements

which wore not in cilect when the haterial was propared.

Inasauch ns this notchinl has been delivexed, as agcinst current

the ie1 is idling no further action

roquest sor pecose only, itter reviow of the gaterial it now

On iiI. I.

Should the

has, desire necess to sone of the naterial with lesser excisions

and

in accordance with current excision agreenents, sane will

be provided upon acqueat.

C, Hand I. laterials pertaining to Dr. Martin Luther

KInE, Jr.

dated July 22, 1975, the Attorney General

navised the SSC thai rosponse to these rcquests must avati an

agiconent which is ponding keiveen the SSC and attorneys

ropsesenting Irs. King which would delineate the type of inforia

tion to be furnished to the sSc.

IV. Newly requested materials; access to screen for delivery

requested by Friday, August 1, 1975:

A. Icquosis abstracts of Ixecutivo Conference

senorendy iro: January 1, 1060, to prosent.

According to

1975, Agrecment,

material will be made available

masso los screening by hugust &, 1070, and you will be advisca

when it is prepared.

NH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 149

---

## Page 150

U. S. Sonate Select Commlitee

To Study Govermental Operations

With Pospect to Intolligonco Activities (SSC)

Requests naterials related to the so-called

"Papich Connittee leport" on FDI-CIA coordination prepared

by August 3,

1075, and you will be advised when it is prepared.

C.

Requests access to this Eureau's "PoroignOperations

Policy

Manual," This manual is avallable for review.

D.

Requests access to the annual five-year budgot

projections

of the FBI Intelligence Division 1970 to the

present. This naicrial is available for review.

I Deleted.

I. Icquests naterials pertaining to surreptitious

entrice considered, proposed or conducied by this Dureau at

the Chiloon Inbassy, January 1, 1970, until the present. this

material is available for revieWS

G. Requests all project INUDI letters propared for

disscuanation to the excoidone, the recornoy Goneral or any

ocher recipient during the DOriOd 1909-1973. This maicrial 15

available. for review.

Il.

[equests access to sunmaries or notes on inter-

views conducted by Inspection Division of specifica Individuals

in connection with the "Official and Contidential" files.

This material was nade available for review on July 31, 1975.

Requesis accost to control 11le for the year 1071

10r the Mass ledin Progron, A IOVieW oi Dareau files has failed

to indicate that any such control file is currently maintained

by this Eurcau.

Knowledgoable FBI Ileadquarters personncl, upon

contact, have advised they have no recollection of a control file

ever being maintained by the bureau concerning this subject.

Any 'ecorded action taken in this regard would be located in

individual case files, not identifiable through our record

system.

I - The Attorney General

=5 -

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 150

---

## Page 151

- - -

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee: Senate Select Committee

a-T enclosures

• Report dated _

8/1/75

Caption of Document:U.S. Senate Select Committee.

Response to Superseded Request 7/28/75, I-IV

Enclosures:

Part I, A thru H;Part II, B&F

Originating Office

Delivered by:

Received by:

E1 Date: Clera 1, 1975

AMPAIG

WH 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 151

---

## Page 152

OTE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence "Comnunity Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term. If a document was made available

for review but not transmitted, so note.)

DOCUMENT BRIEFING INTERVIEW TESTIMONY! OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/3/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

4.

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Menorandun and enclosures

5. IN

RESPONSE TO (list date and item number if in

response to

formal request, other-

state verbal request of (name), initiative, subpoena, etc.)

Sso letter 7/28/75

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

TS or

7. KEY

/ORDs (enter the appropriate key words from

the list provided separately; if key words not listed

for emphasis)

are

Operating procedures

Organization and staffing

Counterintelligence

8.

SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

5.000

Meterinle delivered to 290 that they previousty had access to: FBI

f1l€ 100-00; FBI Iaspectico Caldelines; Index to all S/C memorande

and S/G letters) Petersen Comittee Report on COINTELPRO; All sections

OF FBI Manual of

Intructions and Manual of Pules chi Ragulaticas and

supcrceling

acctions;

Iltles and mumber of FDI. Field Office Agents; FBI

Forms; Underlyina materials to designate COMTELPRE Operations; Under-

Lying natertels partelaing co mail covers. laterials avallable for

review: Information contained in ile so-called "Official and Confidentic]"

files which do not contan derogatory inforustion and which do contain

derogatory info; materlals pertaining to the Attorney General's testi-

mony on 2/27/75, re "types of abuse for which the Bureau has been

suscepitble in the past." SAC letters and Menoranda, Foreign Operations

Policy Manual: Annual S-year budget protections of the FBI Intellisenke

prepared for dissemination to the President, the Attorney Ceneral or

any

other reipient during 1969-1979; Sunnaries or notes on interviews conducte

by Inspection Division in connection with "Official and Confidentlal"

62-716395 MK: fmk

ISSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

(4) Original via liaison to Central Community

55138 DocId: 32989634 Page

152

Index in connection with SENSTUDY 75

---

## Page 153

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

.

Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

certe or a document, 1

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 153

---

## Page 154

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFN 101-11.6

• * UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

: Mx. J. B. Adams

DATE: 8/6/75

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINEDANN

EF

: Legal Counse.

SE DATE 2/22/78

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

SUBJECT: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

The purpose of the memorandum is to set forth in

summary form the requests we have received from various Com-

mittees in Congress and the status of our replies.

senate Select Committee On

Intelligence Activities (Church's Committee)

• Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter,: 5/14/75

Includes among other things

information concerning wire-

taps, including the recon-

struction of Bureau files,

as well as Inspection sur-

veys for ten offices.

Assoc. Dir. _

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs —

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection -

Spec. Inde

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director See'y

Status

Responses

to most

questions prepared,

approved,

and

delivered. Some

responses are await-

ing White House and/

or Departmental

approval.

Letter, 6/27/75

Request for information

Department seeking

concerning alleged abuses.

clarification.

Letter, 6/30/75,

Request pertaining to

Partial response

received by

COINTELPRO.

delivered.

8

Bureau, 7/8/75

Letter,

7/3/75

Requests documents pertain-

Response being

ing to COINTELPRO be furnish- prepared.

ed to the Committegy loGom-

mittee space.

REC-18

Letter, 7/8/75

Communication to all em-

620160-950582

ployees concerning Senate

prepared.

Select Committee inquiries.

• 1 - Mr. Wannall

(Attn:

Mr.

1. - Mr. Mintz

HE AUG 12 1975

Cregar)

1-

Mr. Hotis

1 - Mrs. Metcalf

1 - Mr. Daly

LAD: Ladle"

CONTINUED - OVER

Nối

(8)

LEGNE BO

INSER

84

4

1975

IN 55130-19@cId: 32989631

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

Page 154

---

## Page 155

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Date of Request

Letter, 7/14/75

Nature of Request

Status

Request concerning two highly Response being

sensitive Bureau programs in prepared.

he foreign intelligence

field.

Letter, 7/14/75

Request concerning

Response being

COINTELPRO documents.

prepared.

Letter, 7/14/75

Material pertaining to

Awaiting Depart-

Martin Luther King.

mental decision.

Letter, 7/14/75

Material pertaining to

Response being

Ku Klux Klan.

prepared.

Letter, 7/16/75

Information regarding

Response prepared

functions of. Attorney Gen-

and delivered to

respect to super-

Department.

ViSIon 01

and policy-making

Eor internal security anc

intelligence

activities.

Letter, 7/24/75

List of Agents in New York

Response prepared

City area who had surname

and delivered to

"Kehoe."

Department.

Letter, 7/28/75

Superseding request for FBI

Response being

materials

for delivery and/

prepared.

or access of Committee.

Committee on the Judiciary

Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights (Tunney's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter, 7/18/75

Material concerning Flag-

Response being

in pon ends system.

prepared.

CONTINUED - OVER

- 2 -

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 155

---

## Page 156

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE:

STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS'

Subcommittee on Oversight

Committee on Ways

and Means (Vanik's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 7/14/75

Description of FBI's in-

formant programs.

Status

Response prepared

and delivered to

Department:

House Select Committee (Pike's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter, 7/22/75

All documents and materials • Partial response

provided to the Senate Select delivered to th

vided to e

Committee to Study Govern•

Department.

mental Operations and request

for all materials related to

budgetary authority.

Letter, 7/24/75

Review documents and

Briefing concerning

materials related to

budget matters being

budgetary matters.

arranged.

Letter, 7/28/75

Inquiry to encompass all

Response being

aspects of the FBI budget

prepared.

as it relates to gathering,

use and dissemination of

Letter, 7/30/75

Various materials related

to the Spring Planning Call

and for briefings with

different Bureau officials.

Response being

prepared.

Hearings

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

request to arrange testimony Date of testimon

efore Subcommittee on Postal has not bee

Facilities, Mail, and Labor established.

Management of the Post Office

and Civil Service Committee

• concerning mail covers and mail

CONTINUED - OVER

-. 3 =

NH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 156

---

## Page 157

...

Legal Counsel to. Mr. Adams

STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL,

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Hearings (continued)

Date "of Request

7:/29/.75

Nature of Request

Orally advised by Committee

see nee weet matter.

Status

Assistant Director

Eugene Walsh to

appear with Assistant

Attorney General

Glen E. Pommerening

on 818/75.

RECOMMENDATION:

• For information.

-; 4.-

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

157

---

## Page 158

Assoc. Dir.

tini to ut

Dep.-A.D.-Adm

Dep-A.D.-Inv.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

MR 013 TP CODE

Comp. Svst.

Ext. Affairs

AUB 2 € 197511

Files & Com.

5858

PN NITEL AUG 26, 1975 JMM

TOS

DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395)

FROM:

TAMPA

8105-5390)

Gen. Inv. -

TELETYPE

Ident.

SENSI UDY 75

C.G10

nspectio

nell. Oft

Lavratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun

RE BUREAU TELS MAY 2 AND AUGUST 26, 19753 AND BUREAU TERATOR RET

TO TAMPA, ALGUSI 26, 1975.

ON AUGUST 26, 1975, SEYMOUR PHILL IPS, UN IT CHIEF, FBIHQ,

ADVISED IPO HE WILL HANDLE LEAD TO CONTACI FORMER SA PAUL LO

00X.

NO FURTHER ACTION BEING TAKEN BY TAMPA.

END

HOLD

REE 21: 62-116385-581

EX-106.

HE MENARES NOSESH

" AUG 28 1975

#MORIG

ALL INTORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASHED

DArE 10 - 11-00 5X5P-2 ALMIATE

84 SEP 2

1975

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 158

---

## Page 159

IR 011 BA CODED

8:44 PM NITEL 8/21/75 JAN

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIPNT

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 2 1 1975

TELETYPE

TO :

DIRECTOR

FROM:

BALTIMORE

SENSTUD Y

75

(62-115395)

(62-3127)

RE BUNITEL AUGUST 20, 1975.

FORMER SA'S GEORGE A. BERLEY AND JOSEPH M. ENGLISH CONIACTED

BY THE ASAC ON AUGUST 20, 1975 AND ALGUST 21, 1975, RESPECTIVELY.

INSTRUCT IONS IN RETEL FOLLOWED •

NEITHER OF THESE FORMER SA'S HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY IHE

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE STAFF TO DATE AND EACH STATED THEY WOULD

CONTACT THE FBI SHOULD THEY BE CONTACTED IN THE FUTURE.

END

#MOR 16

132.

TA TON C00711:19

ASsoC. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Aam

Dep.-A.D.-Inv.-

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan.

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Ris, are

Director Sec'g

COPY

RETAINED N4

PERSONNEL

RECOROS:

REÒ 27.

X-106

C22 580

* AUG 28 1975

145561

45927

8

HH 55138

Ả PAT 191

7289634

Pane

159

---

## Page 160

TO

FROM

:

SUBJECT:

00-1+11

OPTIONAL FORM NO,1O

110— 46

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN, REG. NO.,27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

Mr. W. R.

Wannaltu

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Ing.

1

- Mr. N. P. Callahan

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

1 = ME: 7: 3: Jdakins

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs -

DATE: 6/18/75

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

1 - Each Assistant Director

Ident.

W.

regar

1 - Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

SENSTUDY 75

Laboratory

Legal Court

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. -

Training-

Telephone Rm. -

irector Sec'y -

This memorandum reports the results of a meeting of

the Executive Committee of the Ad Hoc Coordinating Group on

Congressional Review of the Intelligence Community (hereinafter

referred to as the Group) held at CIA Headquarters on the

afternoon of 6/16/75.

This meeting was chaired by Mr. William Colby in his

role as the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI). In

attendance were Mr. Philip Buchen, Counsel to the President;

Mr. Roderick Hills, Counsel to the President; Mr. James A.

Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President; Mr. John Clarke,

Associate Deputy to the DCI; as well as senior officials from

Defense, Treasury, National Security Agency (NSA), and the

National Security Council (NSC). The Bureau was represented

by Inspector John B. Hotis and Section Chief William O. Cregar

FOREIGN AGREEMENTS

There was considerable discussion among the members

as to whether the intelligence community would furnish to the

Senate Select Committee (SSC) copies of agreements between

various agencies of the intelligence community and their

counterparts in foreign governments. This apparently presents

a very difficult problem for the community and no decision was

made as to how these will be handled.

The White House, as well

as the Secretary of State, are considering how the community

should proceed.

REC 27

Enclosure

EX-106

62114385579

62-116395

5 AUG 281975

WOC:1hblhb

(18)

CONTINUED • OVER

84 SEP 2

1975

HH 55138 DocId:32989634

Page 160

---

## Page 161

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re: Senstudy 75

62-116395

OUTLINE FOR INQUIRY PROCEDURES

Attached is a copy of the procedures for interviewing

current and former employees of any agency or department of

the intelligence community which interviews are to be conducted

by the SSC. The agreement was negotiated between the

White House and the SSC with little consultation with the

individual members of the intelligence community. The most

significant aspect of the agreement is identified on page 1,

paragraph A. This paragraph identifies two categories of

pa agrance

interviews

SSC Staff Members expect to conduct. They are:

1. Those primarily seeking information concerning

the overall structure and function of any agency of its rela-

tionship with other agencies or the Executive branch; the

substantive work done in the past or being done by the agency,

including the legal bases relied upon and the requisite approval

levels for authorization; the capacities of each agency and the

responsibilities to provide information for other governmental

entities.

2. As designated by the Committee, those primarily

concerning specific allegations of agency or Executive branch

abuses or other controversial specific matters where there is

reason to believe improprieties may have occurred.

As a general rule, an agency representative will be

present at interviews or preliminary testimony in the first

category. Similarly, as a general rule, agency representatives

will not be present at interviews or preliminary testimony in

the second category (alleged abuse situations).

Although the agreement was worked out between the

White House and the SSC without consultation with the FBI, the

Intelligence Division believes it is workable and is certainly

better than the situation which currently exists where there

is no agreed-upon procedire established for the conduct of

interviews of current or former employees.

• 2.=

55138 DooId:32989634 Page'161

CONTINUED - OvEr

---

## Page 162

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re: Senstudy 75

62-116395

(5)

SSC FOREIGN TRAVEL

The CIA was informed by Senator Walter F. Mondale,

a member of the SSC, that he intended to travel to Europe to

inspect some of the l

JER (5) 121(8)

and other locations.

The White House, and particularly

Mr. Roderick Hills, was very concerned about this type of

trip feeling that it could cause all sorts of problems with

friendly

JEK A

+ 6(11 (B)

JEK AC

6(11 (B)

Mr. Colby felt that Act

6 (1) (B)

such trips had been arranged for in the past involving

congressmen and that some good came out of such trips.

The

Committee discussed the pros and cons of the contemplated

trip by Mondale and possibly Senator Gary Hart, also a member

of the SSC, and decided that the purpose and procedures for

such trips would be discussed with Senator Church by Mr. Colby

and a senior official of the Department of State.

NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATES

The SSC has asked Colby for detailed briefings as

to how National Intelligence Estimates are prepared by the

United States Intelligence Board for the NSC. Colby contem-

plates giving a rather detailed briefing to the SSC on this

procedure accompanied by several senior officials of the

Intelligence Community Staff.

ACTION:

For information and record purposes.

aRWwas

PeM

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

162

I recommend that we confirm this

by letter to Senator Church. I have

been unable to find on.

decumentating that ituds

Whaccepted by the Committer.

---

## Page 163

i"?.

#MDR16

10/111100

6/13/55

CURLINE FOR ENQUIRY. PROCSDERES

Iù is hopea thai these voluntary guidalines will permit the

Selact Comittae inrestigation to procaed without undue dalay, but it

is also

recognized that these guidelines do noi cover all points or

anticizate all problems and that, überefore, either the Select Cormitze

or some agency. under investigation ray have reason not to follow tiese

suggested guidelines.

Also, it is recognized that this outlina is without prejudica

to toe respective legal positions of the agencies and the Select

Committee as to the productioz oi specific information by way. of coci-

ments or testinony, It is furiner recogizad that toese procedures do

not in any way constitute a precedent for other comittees of tze

Senate or House.

• A. Classification of Inierriers/Preliminary Festimony

The parties to this intesuigation by the Select Cormittae

recognize that interriers/preliminam testimony to be conducted by tire

Carmittee staff will generally, be of two separate and distinct natures.

(1)

Taose primarily seeising intoration concerning. (A) the

overall structure and functions of any agency or its relationscio

ritz oüber agancies or the Executive brazca; (B) the substantive

work dose in the past or being done by the agency, including the

legal bases relied upon and the requisite approval levels. fo=

authorization; and (C) the capacities of each agency and tze

responsibilities to provide infomation for other goverrmentai

entities.

(2) As designated by the Commitiee, those primarily coscari-

ing specific allegations of agancy os Executive branch souses o

other controversial specific matters there there is reason io

believe inproprieties may have occurred.

+2116-395-579

* References _to "agency" belor are to all Coveramental entities

co"

---

## Page 164

2

An agency representatire ill ba presenü, as a general ria,

at interviews/arelininary testinozy is the firsi category for the pu-

pose of assisting the Committee's investigation and facilitating the

protection of incomätion important io the national interest which is.

pertinent to the investigatio... Similarly, as a general rule, agancy

representatives will tot be presant at intertieus/preliminary testiory

in the second category.

Ire garties recogniza, however, that for

spacial reasons. exceptions can ba nade in either casa: i.e., when good

reason exists, endorsed by the Select Camitize, agency representatires

may sot be present for intervieus/preliminary tastimony falling under

the

first categort; and for good ard surficient reason the agency ray

have a representative present in the secona caiegory subject to the

approval, of course, of the Select Commitize-

Proceduras

When the. Select Comitia nas identilied a specific susject

as a potential abusa or impropriety and has so notified the agercy

involvea of its designation, thai agarcy vill, subject to the secora

sentence hereoi, nake evary reasonable etior to provide the Select

Conmittee with all intomation and all materials that it has on the

subject.

Ice agezey will also specifically indicate any of such

materials vnica ara extraordinarly sensitiva in ardes to facilitate

the mutual effort by the Committea and the agencies to provide specia

handling techniques to convey or secure any particularly sensitiva

inforcation or materials as appropriata.

(1) Subject to the exceptions set forth below, vitresses

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 164

---

## Page 165

3

will be identiried to the agency à reasonzole tire prior to interviews

or taking sworn testinony. Inis ganeral rule includes current

employees,. former employees or others who have or have had a relation-

ship with the agency..

Exceptions

A. Where the Commiitee or its appropriate delegee, by

walduen authorization, believes that prior centillcazion 01 a

witness could adversely affect the vitaess! willingness to ba

interviereà or to be forincoming, or coula otserrise hinder tae

investigation, such prior notice will not be given, but in

such cases the agency scall ba given a general indication of

the points or areas to be covered to the extent that is feasible

without undercutting the reason for not providing prior zotica

in the first instance:

B:

In certain cases, the Commitice night notify the agaacy,

¡i the agency agreas not to contaci tre witness before mis

appearance.

The agency could identify for the Comittee special

security matters concerning prospective witnesses and provide

information on how to locate a witness.

(2) . It the witness wishes to consult with the agency arios

to his appearance, ühe Committee will lot discourage or seek to

interfere with that desire in any way and will help the witness cor-

tact the agency representative.

The Connittee will explain and make

available the security arrangements batween the Cormittee and the

agency, the relevant waivers of secrecy oaths or agreements for the

purpose oi this inquiry, and these ground rules.

(3) Waenever they are not present aù interviews or the

taxino oî sworn siatemeats, agency representatives will be available for

cossultations regarding

the handling of spacial security matters.

(4) Waather or not aa agony has notice of an interview

oz sworn staterent, the Cosmittee racognises that there may be ratters

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 165

---

## Page 166

disciosed inich are particularly sensitiva irca a sacurity point oi

view and concerning which the agency should be advised in order to

give it an opportunity to facilitate the mutual effort with respect

to special handling tachniques referred to above. With respect to

such matters, the Cormittee will advise the agency as soon as possible

and in a form whick discloses the substance of such matters without

making discernibla toe identity oi a confidential source. In addition,

¿se Comnittee vill, prior to naking any findings wita respect to a.

matter, infom the agency of the substance of what was said in order

to provide an opportunity for clarification or response.

(5) Whenaver an agency receives juius notica of a particuia

interview or taking of a sworn statement, iù will also ba notified i

tie general subject areas and periods of employment in which ide

Cormittee is primarily interested as well as the date set for the.

apearance.

The agency vill üher chack the subject's persorzel history

file and prompily advise the Committee of any exceptionally sensitive.

aspacts of the subject's enploycent or activivy waich require spacial

handling,

(6) • Il, because of concera aboui security of sensitive

intomation,

a witness reals unable to give a responsive ansver to a

particular question, the winess snail so indicate to the interviewer.

The questioner and witness may thes consult with the agency repra-

santative with respact to za appropriaie response which will facilitate

the provision of pertinent infomation ard its protection.

These

• naboars shold be worked out tostaviva and ordinarily. before the close

on to interview/testinony sessios.

55138 'DocId: 32989634 Page 166

---

## Page 167

(T) Tae Cormittee is responsible for providing special

hazäling of interview zotes and other vocking zotes in a manner visica

will protect sensitive material. At the conclusion of the Conmittee's

Inquiry the Comittee-in accordance with Comittee Rules, the Rules

oi she Saraie, and any previously made comitrents to as agercy will.

consult with the agencies concemed regarding the appropriate dis

position oi any suce rotes which have not been destroyed following the.

preparation of finished Cormittee documents. The agencies will indicate

which of these notes it feels are too sensitive to. be stored undez tre

Archives arrangement being established ior the general disposition oi

the Camittee's working papers ana noz-public reports.

WW 55138 DocTd:32989634

Page 167

---

## Page 168

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR 141 CFRO 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

: Mr. J.

•B.

Adams

FROM

: Legal

counsel gam git

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

• 1 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Cregar

DATE: 8/6/75

• 1 - Personnel File -

James Patrick Kehoe

1 - Mr. Hotis

I - Mr. Daly

James Dick, Staff Member, Senate Select Committee,

requested that Special. Agent James Patrick Kehoe be made

available for interview to be taken under oath 'by a Senator at

Assoc. Dir.

DepAD Adh

Dep. AD Inv

Asst. Dirs:

Admine

Comp! Syst. _

Ext. Affairs -

Filos & Com. _

Gon. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection.

Intell.

Legal Cour

Plan. & Eval

Spec. Inv!.

Training -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

1310-11-00

*Sp

N

The focus of the interview would be mail openings,

• covers and intercepts. This has been determined to be an—

abuse-area.

Despite the fact the Department is examining various

types of mail surveillance with the view to possible prosecution,

Michael Shaheen, Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination,

has determined that SA Kehoe's furnishing information on this

subject would not impede the Department's inquiry.

On August. 5, 1975, SA Kehoe was advised of the above

and that he should be available for briefing at 7:45 a.m.,

August 8, at Room 4509 in the Justice Building.

SA Kehoe said that he would probably be represented

by private counsel during the interview and planned to invoke

the Fifth Amendment: He asked whether this would prejudice

his position in the Bureau.

SA Kehoe was told that the

decision as to whether or not to invoke the Fifth Amendment •

was his alone to make and that under no circumstances would

it be used to his detriment in the Bureau.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

REC 21

67-116342

EX-106

(1) • That SA Kehoe be

released from his existatg 28 1975

• employment agreement for purposes of this interview consistent

with the above limitations and that the provisions of ritie

be also waived for the purpose of this interview.

RCD: lad lack

(9)

RECOMMENDATIONS - OVER

5512o DocId: 329896JY PaySayies Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 169

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: SENSTUDY 75

(2). That an Intelligence Division representative

be available but not present during the interview of SA Kehoe

in the event that questions arise concerning the proper scope

of the interview.

whel

-

epen

• -2.-

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

169

---

## Page 170

1542

1554

1560

156₴

1566

,561

Mr. W. R. Wannall

A. B. Fulton

1 = Nir.

W.

1-

W.

Wannall

0.

Cregar

1 - Mix. J.

G. Deegen

1 - Mr. Fi. I. Shackelford

8/7/75

1- Mr. A. B. Fulton

1 - IiI. D. Eyan

-=

COINTELPRO

-?5

IMDRIG

SPeR ALM/ITE

10l13l00

This is to ake a maticr of record our delivery oi the

Peterson report on FSI Cointelpros to the Senate Select Committee (ESC)

and to record excisions which have been made in this report with the

consent of the SSC or in accordance with procedures established by the

ESC.

The "superceding request for FBI materials, " dated

7/28/75, page 1, requests delivery of the Peterson Committee report on

Cointelpros, including all appendices and case summaries, to the esc

by 8/1/75.

The SSC indicated the names of authors of analytical appch-

dices could be deleted from this report and we have excised page 3 of

the report climinating the names of both Department attorneys and FBI

Agents who were members of the Peterson Committee. Additionally,

in Exhibit t of the report which constitutes individual write ups of pro-

posals submitted under the Communist Party, USA, Cointelpro, we

have inserted the following amended pages to protect sensitive sources

and, 150, 188, 159, to, 162, 133, 73, 766, 773, 703, 773, 173, 775, 755,

1285, 1520, 1400. There are attached copies of the above pages ior

which excised pages have been substituted in Exhibit I.

on 7/31/75 Exhibits A through E of the Pcterson report

were obtained from IT. Stove Blackhurst, foom 4313, of the Justice

Building of the oitice of Michael T. Shaheen, Special Council for

Intelligence Coordination.

The Department copies of these exhibits

are veing referred to the SSC with the understanding that the FBI will

prepare an additional copy of these exhibits which will be returned to

the Department.

Inclosures

62-110009

CONTINUED - OVER

1: 02-116395 (Senstudy)

DE:lfj

(8)

111

HOT RECORDED

48 SEP & 1975

84 SEP 4 1975

HH 55136 - DocId: 32989634 Page 170

---

## Page 171

We Cranburto it. V. I. Warmall

62-116009

At the same time, on 7/31/75, excised copies of

Exhibits A through E of the Peterson report, which had previously

been referred to the Department for referral to SSC, were retrieved

from the Department. Because the SSC is being referred the original

exhibits, the excised copies are no longer needed and they will be

destroyed.

ACTION:

None. For information.

- 2 -

HH 55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 171

---

## Page 172

FROM

SUBJECT

M OPIIONAL FORM NO. 10

5010-106

MAY 1902 EDITION

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

MR. CALLAHAN

T.

JENKINS

SENSTUDY - 75

DATE: 8-8-75

Assoc. Dir

Dop. AD

Dep. AD

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst

Ext. Affairs

Files &-Com.

Gon, Iny.

Ident..

Laboratory -

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv.

Соволос -

or Sec'y -

Attached is a copy of a letter I received from Chief Ed

Davis of Los Angeles which he sent on August 5, 1975, to the Chief

Counsel of the Senate Committee to Study Governmental Operations

with Respect to Intelligence Activities.

This letter sets out Chief

Davis' views concerning this matter and his refusal to furnish informa

tion to the Chief Counsel.

ACTION:

Submitted for information.

AL: OR TON CONTAINED

HIPPLE L0 UNCIASSIFTED

32010-11-00 57SR2 ALM

1116

REG 27

#: 6216395577

EX-106

5 AUG 251975

Enc.

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams (Enc.)

1 - Mr. Mintz (Enc.)

1 - Mr. Walsh (Enc.)

1 - Mr. Wannall (Enc.

ENCLOSURE

1975

DocId:32989634 Page 172

---

## Page 173

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

DEPARTING

EDWARD M. DAYIS

Chief of Police

Mailing Address: Box 30158

• L05 Angeles, Calif. 90030

Ref. No. 1.1:

TOM BRADLEY

Mayor

August 5, 1975

Mr. Frederick A. 0. Schwarz, Jr.

Chief Counsel, Senate Committee

to

Study Governmental Operations with

Respect to

intelligence Activities

United States Senate

Washington, D

..с.

20510

Dear Mr. Schwarz:

•...Your request for information about the gathering of

intelligence at a local

level, including the names of

individuals who engage in gathering of intelligence,

:.

is incredible!

I'think that the elected politicians

in Washington

who are supposed to represent their states

are doing a pretty good job of raving the FBI, the CIA,

and the

DEA.

This, however,

involves incest because

they are

federal agencies.. I suppose if members.of

9170и

Congress decide to destroy

the effectiveness of the

FBI,

the CIA, the DEA, and the military that this is

their prerogative as

still.

long as their constituents hold

The attenpt to penetrate the appropriate criminal

intelligence mechanisms of local government by federal

lawmakers is an. absolute violation of the Tenth Amend-*

ment of the constitution.

hell when I provide you with the information you have

requested.

If I didn't gather necessary intelligence information.

on criminal activity in my

city to assist-me in apoly-

ing my

resources at the right place at the right-time,

this city would be in the same shape as many others.

He. are proud of the fact that when crime went up

nationally 26 percent between 1970 and 1974, crime went

down in this city almost five percent. One of the

prime reasons is appropriate intelligence operations.

42-11-595

577

HH 55138 DocId:32989634. Pae 173

SULUSURE

---

## Page 174

Mr. F.

A.

August 5,

1975

Page two

Schwarz, Jr.

We are proud of the fact that this is the only major

city in the country relatively free of any organized

crime influence--that is because of appropriate

intelligence gathering functions.

We are proud of the

fact that terrorists don't intimidate the citizens of

our city--that is largely due to appropriate intelli-

gence gathering processes.

Our intelligence gathering is in absolute conformance

with california law and is done under guidelines set

forth by our civilian Board of Police Commissioners::

I would suggest. that you stick your nose back in your

awn tent.

Very truly yours,

EDWARD M.. DAVIS

Chief of Police

H4 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 174

---

## Page 175

2 - Мыс.

Minte

(1 - Mc. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr.

w. R. Wannall

1 - Mc. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mc. E. W. Larson

August 6, 1975

The Attornéy General

Director, FBI

U. /S. SETATE SELECT CONMITTEE

OY INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSO)

Reference is made to a request for FBI materials

which was formally presented August 5, 1975, by SSC Staff

Representative John I. Elliff. This request is categorized

under three main captions, Roman numerals I through III.

Categories I and II require delivery by August 11, 1975, vith

certain exceptions; category III requires access to certain

materials by August 18, 1975.

1.

We have completed our initial revier of this overall

request and anticipate ve will be able to comply with the

designated deadlines with the following exceptions:

I. A. This request is to be handled by the Deparcment

of Justice.

D. and E. By agreement with SSC Staff, the

deadline for these items has been deferred to August 15, 1975.

II. C. By agreement with SSC Staff, we will attempt

to comply with this request by August 11, 1975; horever, if

ve are unable, we will advise of the status of this request

in the August 11 response.

D. Requests numbered 1 through 7 will be

complied with by August 11. Requests numbered & through 11

Assoc. Dir. Will be complied with by August 15, 1975.

Dep. AD Adm. -

An attenpt will be

Dep. AD Iv. made to comply with request number

12 by August 11, and if

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

unsuccessful, status of the request will be reported on that

Comp. Syst.

date.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

(EX 106

-02110315

dent.

Inspection u

4

Intell.

Laboratory

oy EWL: 1hb|hb

Plon. & Eval. -

(9)

AUG 28 1975

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

Spec. Inv. -

Training

ENCLOSURE

Legal Coun..

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

8/7

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

JocId:

80989634

Page 175

G70 954-346

---

## Page 176

The Attorney General

III. C. and D. It is our understanding that response

to information requested concerning surreptitious entries

vill be deferred ponding receipt of specific guidelines from

the Department of Justice since this arca is currently under

special consideration by the Department.

The specific response to this request vill

be govcined by arrangements to be made betreen SSC Staff and

FBI Representatives.

H. Since it is not possible at chis point to

evaluate the disficulttes represented in this request, an

arrangement tas agreed upon with SSC Staff to actempt to comply

by tho dosignated date (dugust 18, 1975), and 11 not possible

to comly fully at that tine, offer whatever naterial as then

available.

It should be emphasized that the above exceptions

are the result of a preliminary review of the request. It is

possible that unforescen problems night arise curing our

continuing research in the various areas of the request which

will make it necessary to extend the deadlines; horever, tie do

not anticipate such problems at this time and should they arise,

you will be immediately advised. Also, ve are mindful of the

request by the SSC Staff for a partial proffer of materials

and vill attempt to comply whenever circunstances allow.

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: lichael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

NOTE:

Referred-to request is the most recent received from

the SSC. Agreed-upon procedures dictate that Attorney General

communication vill be delivered forthwith upon approval to

kr. Shaheer, Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination,

Department of Justice.

-2.

HN 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 176

---

## Page 177

(8-15-75) -B.

IDAG

Let

to AC

ENL: 146816/75

SECRET

August 4, 1975

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

I. Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;"

delivery requested by Friday, Augustle, 1975:

114400

A.

The notebook or binder containing materials on

FBI legal authority and maintained in the Office

of the Special Counsel.

B. Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970

previously made accessible at FBIHQ in excised

form; unexcised versions of the memoranda bearing

the item-number designations 8, 9, 30, 32, and 37.

С." "Foreign Operations Policy Manual," previously

made accessible at FBIHQ.

The following materials maintained in the so-

called "Official and Confidential" files and

designated "non-derogatory," previously examined

by SSC staff:

1. Agreement Between FBI and Secret Service;

• 2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3. "Black Bag" Jobs;

4. Expansion of FBI Foreign Intelligence

Coverage;

5. Intelligence Coverage - Domestic and Foreign;

6. Directives (60);

7. Cook, Fred (52).

Summaries or notes on interviews conducted by

Inspection Division for July 3 Inspection for the

individuals whose names are underscored on the

attached list (slightly expanded from previous

access request).

F. $.

Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division

and the San Francisco Field Office, as currently

sanitized.

42114395-5740

ENCLOSURE,

AIMLIE

1Н 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 177

---

## Page 178

-2-

II.

Newly requested materials;

delivery requested by

Friday, August l$, 1975:

A. All of Section & of the Manual of Instructions.

B.

Sections 1, 6, 7H, 7J, 8L, and 14 F of the Manual

of Rules and Reulations.

C.

Superseding versions of Section 6 of the Manual

of Rules ana Regulations.

D.

The following materials referred to in

memoranda previously delivered to SSC regard-

ing FBI Legal Attaches:

1.

Memoranda of #. C. Sullivan of June 7, 1971,

and June 16, 1971;

.-..

¿. Menoranda vi Mi. Wannall Of May 27, 1071, and

May 28, 1971;

3. Letter of Hoover to the President dated

: September 21, 1970;

4.

Memorandum of W. C. Sullivan dated September

22, 1970;

5.

Memorandum of Mr. Brennan dated September 21,

1970;

6.

7.

Memorandum of Mr. Child of May 23, 1969:

Recommendations of Dalby, Felt, and Beaver

upon the recommendation made in memorandum

of sullivan of June 7, 19719

8.

Materials

pertaining to conversations between

the President and Hoover regarding foreign

liaison operations in September 1970;

9.

Materials pertaining to conversations between

DI. Kissinger and Hoover in December 1970;

10. Materials pertaining to communications between

• .

the FBI and the State Department regarding

foreign liaison operations in 1970;

11.

Materials pertaining to a conference with the

President regarding, foreion liaison operations

in June 1971;

3747755122 RopId:32989634 Paye 178

---

## Page 179

22x23/22303

-3-

12.

Material pertaining to an inspection of all

FBI foreign liaison posts conducted in 1971.

pursuant to instructions from Hoover to

Assistant Director Ponder in charge of

inspections.

I. Materials pertaining to the origin, operation, and

termination of the Mass Media Program implemented

by the former FBI Crime Records Division.

F.

G.

Materials pertaining to the establishment and

functions of the FBI External Affairs Division.

"Guide to Indexing" and "Rules Pertaining to

the General Index", cited at p. 14, Volume 1,

of the Classifying Instructor's Guide.

H. "The Standard Sub List"

I. The following materials pertaining io Frujevi

INLET:

1. Materials reflecting approval of the

Project on or about November 20, 1969.

2.

Inspection Report referred to in SAC

Memorandun pf December 26, 1972.

-ANY

materiais pertaining to recormendations

trat

theprojaci be terminated.

4.

Letter from FBI to Congressman Les Aspin

in 1973 regardir the Project.

J.

Materials pertaining to the policies and procedures

of the FBI for the

use of FBI agents for so-

called: "undercover"

activity.

i=.

14. 55138 Doc1d:32989634 Pade 179

---

## Page 180

L10.24100-0

228-29

-4-

III.

Newly requested materials; access to screen for

delivery requested by August18, 1975:

A.

The following materials pertaining to Mrs.

Claire (Anna) Chennault and Spiro Agnew:

1.

JEK Act 6

| (B)

-

2.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and "tele-

phone checks"

of tirs. Claire (Anna) Chennault

in November 1968.

3.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, anü termindiiun vi

technical or physical

surveillance and

"telephone checks" of Vice Presidential candidate

Spirto I. Agnew in November 1968.

4. All materials summarizing the results of tech-

nical or physical surveillance, including

incidental overhearings, and "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault and

Spiro I. Agnew

in November 1968.

5.

All materials pertaining to White House

instructions to the FBI for the handling of

the summary letters described in item 4 above.

6. All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White Ilouse as a result-of information

contained in the summary letters described

in item 4

above.

7.

The current addresses of the following former

Special Agents, who may have participated in the

tachnical or physical surveillance or "telephore

of Hrs. Claire

(Anna) Chennault of

Spiro I. Agnew:

a. Phil Clariage

b. William Jackson

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 180

---

## Page 181

- 5 -

+---9=97-

B.

The following materials pertaining to Yeoman

Charles E. Radford:

1.

All materials, including memorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical

surveillances of

Yeoman Charles E. Radford from December

1971 to June 1972.

2.

All materials, including memorializations of

oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, ana

termination of technical surveillance of

two close personal friends of Yeoman Radiora

one retired from the Navy, the other a State

Department employee, from January to April

1972.

3.

4 .

All materials, including memorializations of

oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical surveillance of

Yeoman Radford's step-father in Oregon from

; February to April 1972.

All materials summarizing the results of the

technical surveillances described in items

through 3 above.

5.

All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the summary described in item 4

above.

c.

With respect to surreptitious entries carried out

by the FBI from January 1, 1960°to the present, all

materials pertaining to the following:

1.

The date, place, target, and purpose of each

entry;

2.

The reguest and authorization for each entry

including the identities of the agencies

and/or individuals who requested and/or

authorized the entry;

3.

The procedures and methods used for the conduct

of each entry;

4. The results of each entry, including the

-16 15138

DocId: 32989634 Page Ighformation obtained and the identitics of

---

## Page 182

- 6

the agencies and/or individuals to whom

the information was disseminated.

D. Materials pertaining to any jurisdictional agree

ments, agreenents of coordination, or other agree-

ments between the FBI and any other federal, state

or local agency with regard to the conduct of and

dissemination of information from surreptitious

entries.

E.

The performance ratings (Form FD 185) of the

following current or former FBI employees;

1. George Berley

Wilfred Bergeron

2..

3.

William D. Campbell

4. Richard Suter

F.

G.

5. William Tucker

6. Terry O'Connor

7.

Joseph English

The current office assignment or last known adaress

of the individuals listed in E. above.

The following materials pertaining to NSA watch list

activity, reportealy in operation Ixom late 196.

hrough 1973, wnich involved the monitorina of

international conmunications that were addressed

to, or from, or included the names of persons on a

changing "watch list:"

1. All materials pertaining to the proposing,

approving, putting names on, executing,

evaluating, or terminating the watch list

2.

All materials (including correspondence) sent

by the FbI to the National Security Agency of

any other entity in the Department of Defense

listing names for the watch list or otherwise

commenting on the activity;

_HA 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 182

---

## Page 183

іт- "трін.

- 7-

24.4

.3.

Any internal FBI materials produced as part of

the activity;

4.

Any NSA Or Department of Defense materials

(including correspondence and reports) regara-

ing the watch list activity sent to the FBI.

.H. Materials pertaining to the authorization for FBI

contacts with, dissemination of FBI information to,

receipt of information from, and requests by the

FBI for action by the special services

Internal Revenue Service. (CiRCA 196aJutais of the

"The Handbook of Technical Equipment".

I .

J.

K.

Materials pertaining to FBI activity with respect

to the National Environmental Teach-In (also known

as "Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

Philadelphia FBI Field Office file numbes 100-51132-

(Women's Liberation). (1970-72)

1W 55138_ DorId-32989634 Pare 183_

---

## Page 184

lianes

(1

j. . Hot:"

- Mc. T'.

R, War-all

1 - Mi:.

..

0. 1.. "gar

: - Mr. E. W. isson

August 6, i7u

The Atcorney General

i ..

Directos, is.

U.S. SKATE SELECT COLITTLE

ON LTELIICRNCE ACEIVITIES (SSC)

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

IEREIN IS UNCLASSIRIN

DATE 1/22/00 BY SP-2 ALTE

1116

Raference is mide to & request fos fBI incuriots.

which was formally presented August 5, 1075, by SSC Staff

Reprosentarive John I. Elliff. This request is cutegorisi

unde: thrre min captions, Roman numerals I chrougn III.

Categories I and II require delivery by August i, 1975, vich

certsin exceptions; category III reguires access to certain

mater inls ly August 18, '1975.

le have compieted our initial ravlew of this u. cali

request and anticirate we vill be able to comply flin tha

desigrated deadlines with the following exciptions:

1. Ao shis ryuest 15 to be hendled by tre Courta:

of justice.

D. and F. By egreemint with SSC Start, thi

/ daallino for these items lus been deferred t: use l, 1975.

Il. C.

Fy agreevent with SSC Staff, ne vill timp:

to comply wich thi: request by August 11, 1975, horever, it

we .se urable, we vill advise of the status of rhis reccuse

In the mis st il response.

D.

requests numbered I chrough ill be

compliou rich by August 11.

Requests numbered & througs 11

soc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adre.

-will be complied with by August 15, 1975.

Dup. AD

nade to corply with request number 12 by sugust it, and ii

si, st. Dir..

Aimin.

in iccasural, stacus of che requert vill

Corp. Sys

oute.

iro Affoirs,

REO 27

" les & Com.

610•

urn. Inn.

Ident.

•spcction

11

Inteil.

SEE "OTS TAGE

Loboratory

A: 831973

2

P on. & Eval. -

(9)

Spoc. Inv.

• raining

' 1030:22

•gal Coun.

elephone .:r.

ector

3 2 SEP 2

---

## Page 185

The Accorney General

III. C. and Do It is cis undersianding that responen.

to Inforpacion cequested concerning succepticious entries

vill be duferred ponding seceipt us specific guidelines fcos

the Deserinent of

Justice since this area is currently under

special consideration by the Depertment.

E. The specific response to this request vill

be governed by arrangements to be made between SSc Scafe and

FBI Represencatives.

1lo since in is not possible at ciis port to

evaluate the difticulties sepresented in this zoruest, an

arrangement tus agreed upon with SSC Stais to neeshpt to comply

by the designated date (Augusü 18, 1975), and 1f not possible

to connly fully at chat time, offer whatever matorial was chen

available.

I. should be emphasized that the abous captions

use the ces:lt of a pocliminacy review of the reunst. It i

possible that urforesson problems might arise during ous

corinning reseerch in the varions areas of the request thuch

vill nake ir necessary i extend the deadlines; corever, ve do

not anticipice such probleus at this time ind should they arise,

vou will be irmedictely advised. Also, we are mindful of the

Inquast by the SSC Staif for a nartial proffer oi paterials

and will sttempt to comply whenevor circunstances allow.

1 - The reputy Attorney General

ditention:

Michael I. shaheen, Jr.

Sprcial. Counsel Fcr

Incolligence Concoination

"OTE:

Raferred-to request is the mosi cecent raceivur fron

the SSC.

Agcced-upon procedures intate that Attomey Conaral

rasand En Commictee within 24 houcs of tue receint nt ey

requesi to identify any problem areas and exceptions.

this

commication vill be delivered forthrith mpor anproval in

Mr. Shaheen, Sperial Counsel for Intelligence Cocodinattu,

Denartment

of justice.

•2=

--

ки 55138

DocId: 32989634 Paye 185

---

## Page 186

{8-15-75) - =

SECRET

August 4, 1975

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

I. Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Friday, Augustle, 1975:

A.

The notebook or binder containing materials on

FBI legal authority and maintained in the Office

of the Special Counsel.

B.

Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970

previously made accessible at FBIHQ in excisea

form; unexcised versions of the memoranda bearing

the item-number designations 8, 9, 30,

32, and 37.

C. "Foreign Operations Policy Manual," previousiy

made accessible at FBIHQ.

The following materials maintained in the so-

called "Official and Confidential" files and

designated "non-derogatory," previously examined

by SSC staff:

1. Agreement Between FBI and Secret Service;

• 2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3. "Black Bag" Jobs;

4. Expansion of FBI Foreign Intelligence

Coverage;

5. Intelligence Coverage - Domestic and Foreign;

6.. Directives (60);

7. Cook, Fred (52).

F. 8.

Summaries or notes on interviews conducted by

Inspection Division for July j Inspection for the

individuals whose names are underscored on the

attached list (slightly expanded from previous

access request,.

Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division

and the San Francisco Field Office, as currently

sanitized.

ENCLOSUNS,

regist"

HH 55138

DocId•32989634 Pade 186

---

## Page 187

= 2-

II.

Newly requested materials; delivery requested by

Friday, Augustlf, 1975:

A. All of section ô of the Manual of Instructions.

E. Sections 1, 6, 7H, 7J, BI, and 14 F of the Manual

of Rules and Reulations.

C. Superseding versions of section 6 of the Manual

of Rules ana Regulations:

D.

The following materials referred to in

memoranda previously delivered to SSC regardi-

ing FBI

Legal Attacnes:

1.

Memoranda of f. C.'Sullivan of June 7, 1971,

and

June 16, 1971;

remoranda uf me. Wannali Jf May 27, 1071, una

May

28, 1971;

3.

Letter of Hoover to the President dated

Septenber 21, 1970;

4.

Memorandum of W. C. Sullivan dated September

22, 1970;

5.

Memorandum of Mr. Brennan dated September 21,

19.70;

6. Memorandum of Mr. Child of May 23, 1969:

7.. Recommendations of Dalby, Felt, and Beaver

upon the

recommendation made in memorandum

of Sullivan of June 7, 19719

8.

Materials pertaining to conversations between

the President and hoover regarding foreign

liaison operations in September 1970;

9.

Materials pertaining to conversations between

DI. Kissinger and Hoover in December 1970:

10.

Materials pertaining to communications betreen

the; FBI and the State Department regarding

foreign liaison operations in 1970;

11.

Materials pertaining to a conference with the

President

regarding, foreion liaison operations

in June 1971;

Tint..

HH

55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 187

---

## Page 188

- 3-

12. Material pertaining to an inspection of all

FBI foreign liaison posts conducted

iT.

• 1971

pursuant to instructions from Hoover to

Assistant Director Ponder in charge of

inspections.

E.

Materials portaining to the origin, operation, and

termination of the lass liedia ProgIam implomented

by the former FBI Crime

Records Division.

F.

Materials pertaining to the establishment and

functions of the FEI External Affairs Division.

G. "Guide to Indexing" and "Rules Pertaining to

the General Index"

, cited at p. 14, Volume 1,

of the Classifying Instructor's Guide.

H. "The Standard Sub List"

The following materials pertaining to Frujevi

INLET :

I.

Materials reflecting approval of the

Project on or about November 20, 1969.

2.

Inspection Report referred to in SAC

Memorandun pf December 26, 1972.

ERat

materis pericintento reconentations

the irajecise terminate.

4.

Letter from FBI

to congressman les Aspin

in 1973

regarding the Project.

J.

Materials pertaining to the policies and procedures

of the FBI for the

use of FBI agents for so-

called: "undercover"

activity.

E. t

---

## Page 189

III. Newly requested materials; access to screen for

delivery rcquested by August18, 1975:

"..

A.

The following materials pertaining to Mrs.

Claire (Anna) Chennault and Spiro Agnew:

1.

JEK Act

(1) (B)

2.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or

phone checks, physical surveillance and

"tele-

in November 1968.

0f sirs. Claire (Anna) Chennault

3. All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization,

conduct, and terminaiiu. oi

technical or physical

surveillance and

"telephone checks" of Vice Presidential candidate

Spirto f. Agnew in November 1968.

4. All materials summarizing the results of tech-

nical or physical surveillance, including

incidental overhearings, and

"telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault ana

Spito I. Agnew in November 1958.

5. All materials pertaining to White House

instructions to the. FBi for the handling of

the surrary letters described in item above.

6.

All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White llouse as a result-of information

contained in the summary letters describea

in item 4 above.

7.

The current addresses of the following former

Special Agents, who may have participated in the

technical or physical surveillance or "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire

(Anna) Chennault of

Spiro I. Agnew:

a. Phil Clariage

3. William Jackson

MH 55138 Doc1d•32989634 Pade 189

---

## Page 190

- 5 ..

B. The following materials pertaining to Yeoman

Charles E. Radford:

1.

All materials, including memorializations

of oral

conmunications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical

surveillances o

Yeoman Charies I. Radford from December

1971 to June 1972.

All materials, including memorializations of

oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, ano

termination of technical

surveillance of

two close personal friends of Yeoman Radiora

one retired from the Navy, the other a State

Department employee, from January to April

3. All matorials, including memorializations of

oral communications, pertaining to tre

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical surveillance of

: Raûfora's step-father in Orego? from

February to April 1972.

4. All materials summarizing the results of the

technical surveillances described in Items

through 3 above.

5. All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the summary described in item 4

above.

C. With respect to surreptitious entries carried out

by the FBI from January 1, 1960° to the present, al:

materials

pertaining to the following:

1.

The date, place, target, and purpose of each

entry:

2.

The request and authorization for each ent=y

including the identities of the agencies

and/or individuals who requested and, or

authorized the entry;

3.

The procedures and methods used for the concuot

of each entry;

4.

The results of each entry, including the

information obtained and the identities

he sem of sent

'st "years inn"

HH

55138 DocId:32989634

Page 190

fuse

---

## Page 191

- 6 -

the agencies and/or individuals to whom

the information was disseminated.

M....

D. Materials pertaining to any jurisdictional agree-

ments, agreements of coordination, or other agree-

ento between o

between the PRI and any other federal, state

•or local agency with regara to the conduct of ans

dissemination of information from surreptitious

entries.

E.

The performance ratings (Form ED 185) Of the

following current or former FBI employees;

1. George Berley

2.. Wilfred Bergeron

3. William D. Campbell.

4. Richard Suter

5. William Fucker

6.: Terry O'Connor

7.

Joseph English

E'.

The current office assignment or last known adaress

of the indiviauals listed in E. above.

G.

The following materials pertaining to NSA watch lis=

activity, reportedly in operation from late 1967

through

1973, nich

involvea the monitoring of

international conmunications that were addressed

to, or fron, or included the names of persons on a

changing "watch list:"

1.

A11 naterials pertaining to the proposing,

approving, putting names on, executina,

evaluating, or terminating the watch list

activity;

2.

All materials (including correspondence) sent

by the FBI to the National Security Agency o=

any other entity in the Department of Defense

listing names for the watch list or otherwise

cormenting on the activity:

IL: 55128 D00T0-30989634

Pare 191

Ernes

---

## Page 192

- 7=

3. Any internal FBI materials produced as part of

the activity;

4.

Any NSA: Or Department of Defense materials

(including correspondence and reports)

regard-

ing the watch list activity sent to the Fbi.

. H.

Materials pertaining to the authorization oI FBI

contacts with, dissonination oi fBI intormation to,

receipt of information from, and requests by the

FBI for action by the Special Services

Internal, Revenue Service. (SiRGA 196%)SEaÉE Of the

I. "The Handbook of Technical Equipment"

J.

Materials pertaining to FBI activity with respect

to the rational Environmental Teach-In (also known

as

"Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

K. Philadelphia FBI Field, Vifice fiie nuite: 100-J1132

(Women's

Liberation) - 1970-72)

---

## Page 193

i

CODE

TELETYPE

TO SACS ALBANY

BALTIMORE

MIAMI

PHILADELPHIA

TAMPA

2

ir. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

NITEL

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

AUGUST 25, 1975

1 - MX. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

PERSONAL, ATTENTION

FROM DIRECTOR FBI (62-116395)

#MOR16

SENSTUDY 75

1"":

10-11-00 SPZALM/STE

REBUTEL MAY 2, 1975.

INQUIRIES MADE OF BUREAU BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC)

CONCERNING BELOW-LISTED FORMER FBI EMPLOYEES SUGGESTS THEY MAY

BE INTERVIEWED BY SSC STAFF. WHILE SUBJECT OF INTERVIEWS HAS

NOT BEEN DISCUSSED BY SSC, INTERVIEWS WILL LIKELY PERTAIN TO

THESE FORMER IMPLOYEES' DUTIES WHILE IN THE INTERNAL SECURITY

AND/OR SUBVERSIVE CONTROL SECTIONS AND MAY ALSO RELATE TO THE

FORMER BUREAU'S INVESTIGATIONS OF MARTIN LUTHER RING, JR.

COMMUNIST INFLUENCES IN RACIAL MATTERS AND RELATED MATTERS.

SET OUT BELOW ARE LAST KNOWN ADDRESSES OF THESE FORMER BUREAU

EMPLOYEES.

SFP:1hblhb

(7)

REC 27

62143255575

SEE NOTE PACE AUG 2' 1575

'EX-106

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv, -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.-.

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. _

Gon. Inv._

Ident...

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory _

Plan. & Evale-

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. _

55138- PacId: 32989634

FEDERAL CUREAU OF INVESTIGATICN

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 2Ô 1975

TELETYPE

Wil

Page

193

---

## Page 194

PAGE TWO 62-116395

EACH OF THESE FORMER IMPLOYEES IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY

CONTACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE MIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE SSC

STAFF. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN THE EVENT THEY ARI.

INTERVIEVED AND DURING COURSE OF SAME, QUESTIONS ARE ASKED

WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS

AND TECHNIQUES,, ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS, AND THIRD AGENCY RULE,

INCLUDING IDENTITIES OF FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES), THEY

MAY REQUEST AN FBI AGENT BE PRESENT. BUREAU WILL PROVIDE

AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEVEE. AS A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW,

THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF,

CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALI FOR

FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO

CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT

IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT

INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSE WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE

AND TO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION. CONTACTS WITH

THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES TO BE HANDLED PERSONALLY BY SAC OR

ASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO BE

HANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR.

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 194

---

## Page 195

PAGE THREE

62-116395

INMEDIATELY AFTER CONTACI, RESULIS SHOULD BE FURNISHED

BUREAU BY TELETYPE IN ABOVE CAPTION. IF A FORMER EMPLOYEE NO

LONGER IN YOUR TERRITORY OR TEMPORARILY AVAY, SET OUT LEAD TO

OTHER OFFICE IMMEDIATELY WITH COPY TO FBI HEADQUARTERS.

ALBANY: JOHN HI. KLEINKAUF, 1153 CULLEN AVENUE, SCHENECTADY,

NEW YORK 12309; EMPLOYED AS DIRECIOR OF SECURITY AND SAFETY,

UNION COLLEGE, SCHENECTADY, NEW YORK 12308.

BALTIMORE: JAMES F. BLAND, 4310 ROSEDALE AVENUE, BETHESDA,

MARYLAND 20014.

MIAMI: FREDERICK F. FOX, 1450 WESI BISCAYNE CANAL ROAD,

MIAMI, FLORIDA 33161.

PHILADELPHIA: MRS. KATHLEEI LOGAN, SPOUSE OF SA RICHARD E.

LOGAN, ASSIGNED PHILADELPHIA OFFICE.

TAMPA: PAUL L. COX, U.S.N.A. I.O., P.O. BOX 1418,

SARASOTA, FLORIDA 33578.

BEST INFORMATION BUREAU HAS CONCERNING COX'S THEREABOUTS

IS THAT HE IS CURRENTLY ON A LENGTHLY TRIP WITH A MOTOR TRATLER

THROUGH CANADA AND THE MID-WEST. INDICATED ADDRESS BELIEVED TO

BE A TRAILER COURT CONTACT POINT FOR MAILING PURPOSES. BUREAU

DOES NOT DESIRE EXTENSIVE INVESTIGATION TO LOCATE COX AND

HH

55138 DocId:32989634 Page 195

---

## Page 196

PAGE FOUR

62-116395

SUGGESTS FEASIBILITY OF LEAVING SOME MESSAGE THROUGH THE

INDICATED ADDRESS OR SOME MEANS OF FORWARDING A COMMUNICATION

TO COX SO HE MIGHT CONTACT YOUR OFFICE ON RETURN TO AREA OR

SOONER. IAMPA'S REPLY TO BUREAU SHOULD SET OUT WHAT ARRANGEMENTS

FOR POSSIBLE CONTACT HAVE BEEN PERFECTED.

NOTE:

SSC request dated 8/20/75 was for whereabouts of

above former employees. We have separately responded to SSC

with last available information from our files.

Address on

Cox taken from 1975 Directory of the Society of Former Special

Agents. Supervisor S. F. Phillips of Senstudy 75 Project

determined from a mutilal acquaintance the information relating

to Cox.

Procedure for alerting former employees is being done

in accordance with what we have been doing concerning many

other former employees. The referenced 5/2/75 teletype

furnished all offices background on SSC requests and Bureau's

cooperation with the SSC.

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 196

---

## Page 197

August 12, 1975

Mr. Seymor Fred Phillips

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D. Co

Room 4063

Dear Seymor:

if on

Attached for your information is a memo on my staff interview

in G-308 August 11, 1975 in accordance with our conversation.

While there was no indication as to recall, I would appreciate

a return note from you to confirm that you

received the memo and

to suggest an a, b, o procedure in the event that I get a call

to return for any additional staff type interview. Secondly,

if the Executive committee or others send a

formal subpoena,

as you indicated I need to know a definite a, b, o procedure

with phone numbers to best represent all our

interests. I look

forward to this message.

The attached material is not in the order of the questions as

asked. The questions were disconnected and left one with a

feeling of incompleteness. I think the main thrust stands out

clearly.

Since Mr. Hoover had publictyl stated during those years that

we were engaged in a certain amount of technical surveillance,

could elaborate properly on certain associated

phases without encroaching on the records. I hope the materiali

will be of interest to you. Please excuse

the dubious typing.

DAG

EX-I0L

REC-56

Best to you,

sincerey,

R. I.

Millen

62=116345-574

9 AUG 27 19.75

ENCLOSURE

129641603

•9029

r:

923-81 SP4JMM

6074

84 AUG 28. 197539634

Page 197

---

## Page 198

MEMORANDUM

August 12, 1975

TO: SEYMOR F. PHILLIPS

FROM: R. L. MILLENN

SUBJECT: SENATE CONMITTEE on INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

I. BACKGROUND

Telephonic request was received 8:40 pm August 5, 1975

from Michael Epstein to appear in Room G-308 NSOB August 11

or 12 for a staff interview. Air travel was confirmed August 6.

Appearance was made by the writer 11:45 am to 1:30 pm August 11,

in the presence of Mr. Epstein and Mary DeOreo. Advised of staff

interview rights.

II. INTERVIEW PROPER

A. Personal Background

1. Q. When did you leave the FBI?

A. December 30, 1965.

2. Qo How long in the FBI?

A. 1938 to December

3.

personally constructing radio stations and

travelling for months at a time, however, my

office of assignment remained in Washington.

4.

Q. Where did a non lawyer background fit?

A. Prior to WW II the Bureau began to need additional

help to manage the placement of two way radios in

cars, construct point to point emergency radio

stations to handle communications in case of war,

disaster or nationwide communications strike, en-

gineer, design and construct voice communication

systems for all the field offices as well as the

writing of specifications, reviewing of bids, testing

and installing the hardware in the field. This work

fell outside the usual capabilities of law trained

agents. In 1943, the individual efforts of the

several engineers were solidified into a Radic

Engineering Section placed under the FBI Laboratory

for

administrative purposes. From the beginning, the

mission of this group was that of a service and sup-

port section rather than that of operations. Cases

were worked by field agents under supervision of

their office and the appropriate interested divi

sion supervisors at the headquarters. Field cases

as such were only a section concern when equipment

supply was inadequate of a breakdown occurred.

this event we would be called upon to move equipment

about or correct the defective unit.

#MDR16

ATE ITORTITION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS LECLO?THIZD

DAMS 10-11-00 BY SP-2 ALM/ITE

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 198

ENCLOSURE,

in 2

lit

---

## Page 199

2

B. Personal Information

1. Q. Have you been in contact with the Bureau in this

matter?

A. No.

2.

Have you regularly contacted the Bureau since leaving?

A. No. After leaving,

I was employed on a staff basis

with IACP doing police management and communication

consulting work all over the country.

3. Qo Do you still work for the IACP?

A. Only on call as a consultant in communications. I

am also on call with several other firms.

4. . Were you regularly, knowingly restricted

from

being privy to sensitive, classified information?

5. Q. Without mentioning any classified work, did you

work in classified areas, Top Secret, etc?

Aó Yes, I was cleared Top Secret.

6.

What would represent the longest time that you would

be away from your office while section chief?

A. Ipree weeks.

C. Knowledge

"of other Persons

1. Q. Does the name William Campbell mean anything to you?

A. Yes, I believe he was a specially trained agent of

the Washington Field Office.

2. Q. Did he work in the section?

A." Not while I was there:

3. Qo Did he work in the section for a long period of

time on loan from somewhere else?

4. Q. Coula he have worked in your section on special

assignment without your knowledge?

A. Unlikely that this would occur.

5° Who is R' F. Pfafman and how is it pronounced?

A. Pfafman was an early scientist in the Laboratory

from Purdue. He was initially hired as an

electrical engineer. He retired during my tenure

as section chèef.

6. Qi Where does he live?

A. I believe Seattle having retired from Boeing.

7. Qó Who is Seymor Phillips?

A. I believe he was or is an agent. I am not familiar

with his status.

8. Do you know John Matter?

A. Yes. He was in the section.

9: Q. Did

you socialize with him?

A. No.

The families did not visit back and forth.

10. @ Did he discuss working on a "composite" tape

on

Martin Luther King or that the FBI was investi-

gating Mr. King?

A. Not in my

presence.

11. Q. Did he mention a King investigation while in the

car pool?

A' Not in my presence. (Note: my car pool days in

which he participated was in 1955, 1956 when I

drove a 1955 Buick. From that time

to 1965 I had

my own space in Couct E of the Justice Building

with my irregular hours making car pooling an

impossible situation.)

HH

---

## Page 200

3

D. Relations with Others.

Q." What was your

relationship with w. C. Sullivan?

A. I knew of him as an Assistant Director in charge

of Domestic Intelligence División. As a section

chief of another division I had no occasion to

deal with him. His activities appeared to be along

speech making and editorial lines.

2. Q. How many times did you go to his office?

A. None.

3. How many times did he come to your office?

Hi Q. Didn't he disagree with Parsons as to the role of

the adequacy of the Laboratory scientists?

A. I believe that at one time he challenges the

adequacy of the Laboratorys' contact with outside

concerns. If that is what you had in mind, all I

can say is that I prepared an outline of the con-

tacts which we had and they were most impressive.

They ranged from all the military research est-

blishments through the commercial radio and re-

search companies such as Texas Instruments, etc.

Our section actually excelled in this type of

contact to "keep abreast" of a rapidly changing

Ileld. I heard no more irom farsons or others

after submitting my list:

5: Qo Who assisted

I you during your tenure as section chief?

A. J. Baker.

E. Training•

Q' Did your people furnish any training to field agents?

A. Special training was furnished to selected agents

so that they could serve as contacts in each field

office, alerting the section to parts needs, check-

ing the readiness of field equipment, advising of

equipment needs, aiding in the input

field budget preparation by the section as well

as assisting in planning. These agents, in the

main also

carried their full case loads and were

under the local Agent in Charge, not the section.

F. Recording Facility.

1. Where was this facility physically located with

regards to your office?

A. Physically separated by being in another corridor

across the Justice Building.

2. Q. Not in the 7114 corridor?

A. Correct.

3: Q. Were agents offices attached thereto?

A. les, a couple of bays.

4. Q. Who

had access?

A. Corridor doors were locked at all times but agents

access with keys. Facility doors were locked

separately within that space.

5. Q. Was someone in that space at all times during the

day?

A. Most of the time. We tried to keep someone available

275198. DocTA:32999691 Pade 200

---

## Page 201

in the space in that neither Baker or myself were

qualified to operate the patch panel and recording

equipment and a Directors speech might have to be

recorded on short notice. This was somewhat difficult

in that the work assigned to these people in the form

of security checks for government officials tele-

phones and room security checks for such areas as hearing rooms

necessitated that the work be done outside of the

office space•

6. Q. Were these men fully occupied?

A. Yes.

7.

Q. How did you know they were fully occupied?

A. By an administrative assignment system, kept one

year and then destroyed after statistics were com-

piled. Also by closely following the work load

and making adjustments to keep the 3 to 4 hour

overtime on an equitable basis.

3 Qo How do you know that someone couldn't make a

'composite" tape without vour knowledge - and give

a specific example of why not.

A. As pointed out earlier, I was not present 24 hours

a day and therefore could not continuously mon

itor the displaced space. Within reason, however,

for statistical purposes we needed to document our

input. This was done by assignment slip as it came

through the office by Baker or myself and in some

instances the paper work was done confirmatory

when. the work was started on an urgent assignment

orally. An effort was made early in the time period

as section chief, in 1955, 1956, to clearly

establish this procedure thereby avoiding persons

bringing work of any kind directly to a section

employee. The staff was repeatedly made aware of the

desired procedure. The only specific instance I

can recall occurred early in my tenure, possibly

in 55 or '56 when it was necessary to personally

challenge someone outside the section who was

bringing work directly to a section employee. What

the work was is not important. The bypass of pro-

cedure was. I was called by phone and went im-

mediately to the studio area on the other side

of the building and advised the person that the

proper procedure was not being followed. The person

departed and no further problem existed.

9. &. Who was this person?

A. I believe it was Inspector Kemper.

10. & Who called you in this instance?

A. I can't recall that detail 20 years ago but it

would probably have been someone normally

assigned to that area, such as Matter or Corbett.

11. @ Could it have been disc records or album material?

A. It could have been but the material was not the

prime concern.. the procedure was.

12. Q. Was a memo written?

A. No. The immediate action corrected the problem.

55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 201

---

## Page 202

5

13. Q. Would a "trained" field agent be

able to

operate filter equipment?

1o NO.

14. @ Would Matter be able to operate filter

equipment?

A. Yes.

G. Procedures:

1. Q. If a request to handle material came from a

field office would it have a case caption?

1. Yes, to identify it with files and with the

ivisions supervising the case

2ö Q. Would you ever receive recordings from an

outside source?

A. Yes. Periodically from the military on crashes

of test planes, as for example where the pilot

was trying to tell what was wrong but the

•in-

telligence on the tape recording made on the

was garbled by over riding noises.

Filtering techniques could, at times, success~

fully bring out the message through time con-

suming procedures In these instances, because

of the excessive manpower demands it was necess-

ary to borrow radio engineers aná

trained Washington Pield personnelto work on thaby

separate small portions of the quéstioned tape

3. 8. Die rou here anyth

to expedite the report back to the contributor.

3. Q. Did you have anything to do with codes and

ciphers?

A. None, handled by another section.

4. 0.

What about field recordings?

( Note: Since Mr. Hoover had announces in

public that at one time some 98 technical

surveillances were in operation, it follows

that the Bureau had some training and operated

some equipment in this area of operations.

A. All offices were self sufficient with regard

to

playback and recording equipment. In Kidnapping

cases, for example, the equipment would be

needed on an immediate basis, hence, in my view

when needed from another office or request that

the headquarters in Washington send what they

need. Accordingly no "stock" was held here. The

field inventoried and maintained

• it.

H. Martin Luther King.

1. Q.

Did you know in the period around 1961 that the

Bureau was investigating Mr. King?

A. No, as a support or service facility we would

not be envolved in field work unless there were

equipment or support problems. None were

recalled.

2. Q. Did you instruct that a "composite" tape

be made

on Mr. King?

A. No.

3.

Q. I have inferences that you did. Did you?

A.

I did not.

4. Q.

Is it possible that someone could make a tape

without your knowledge?

MW. 59138

DocId: 32989634 Pave 202

---

## Page 203

6

A. It is possible, but not a probable situation.

As indicated, the section was in two separate

parts with the voiceprint, filtering, recording

and related test equipment located across the

building away from my office. Possible, of

accounting of our work from an administrative

and statistical standpoint to assist in just-

Ilying our existence and our programs to the

satisfaction of the inspection staff.

5. Q. Have you since heard of investigations of Mr. King

A. Through media references

recently.

• @ Did you see material coming through your office

for handling captioned "Martin Luther King"?

A. I did not.

tigations or Matters"?

A. I did not.

I. Miscellaneous Items.

1. Q. Did Mr. Hoover have technical recorders?

A. I recall none during my tenure of 1955-1965. He

was basically opposed to technical things in

that he tended to avoid those items which he

1id not fully understand. Accordingly, much

administrative effort was expended in explain•

fully understood.

2. ITEM. A long list of names was observed. Some

questions about,

people came from this list

such as Pfafmans reference.

3. ITEM. The period of interest appeared to be in

the 1961 or thereabouts era. It is noted that

the person being interviewed is being asked to

recall details occurring 14 or 15 years in the

past.

55138. Dno1d-20090601 Pare 209,

---

## Page 204

... 7

August 19, 1975

Dear Dick:

#EMDRIG

10111-00: SPLAUM/ITE

Thank you for your note of August 12, 1975, and

the enclosed statement concerning a recent interview of

you by the Senate Select Committee Staff.

This note is pursuant to your request for

confirmation of my receipt of your statement.

As to your request that I suggest "an a, b, c

procedure" in the event you get a call for additional

interview of the nature already had or for testimony before

the Conmittee, I can only suggest that in either event

you might desire to contact the Bureau's Legal Counsel

Division by collect call. They will be happy to give you

any necessary help under the circumstances.

Again, thanks for the material you sent.

Sincerely,

Seymor Fred Phillips

Mr. Richard L. Millen

405 Hermitage Drive

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701

IT 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 204

---

## Page 205

YOTE: SEFORE COUPLINS ON REVERSE

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check

review

appropriate

If a document was made available

but not

transmitted, so note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

_X INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY

OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/21/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The Attorney General with a copy for forwarding to

the White House

HSC

4.

IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Memorandum reporting results of an interview by SSC Staff Members

of former FBI Special Agent Richard L. Millen.

IN RESPONSE TO (list date

wise state verbal

request of (name),

of (name), initiative,

if in response

subpoena,

to formal request,

etc.)

NA

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION

(enter

U, C,

TS or

Codeword)

7. need under tent to peate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed

Organization and staffing

#MDR 16

Operating procedures

8. SUMMARY (see reverse

side before

completing this item)

1: 10-11-00

Interviewed regarding Radio Engineering Section of the

FBI Laboratory, as to type of work handled.

62-116395

FMK; Emk

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS VELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379| (6-75)

HW 55138

DocId: 32989631 Page 205

---

## Page 206

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• •If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g.,

restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be

noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

1X55198

DocId: 32989634

Page 206

---

## Page 207

1

- Mr

A. Mintz

1

1

Mr.

J. Cochran

-

Mr.

W. R. Wannall

- Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

August 21, 1975

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

ON

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ITELLIGRNCE ACTIVITIES

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINtU

2-2366)

SPERMIL

60710

Enclosed for your information is a memorandum vith

enclosure concerning an interview by a representative of

the captioned Committee of former FBI Special Agent Richard I.

Millen. Single copies of the memorandum and its enclosure

are also enclosed for forwarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter,

Associate Counsel to the President.

Enclosures (4)

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

REC.56

Intelligence Coordinat 1054-lUI

1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, JI .)

SFP: 1hb |h

(11)

AUG 27197.

PIUS

UNREC CO

ENCLOSURE

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm.

Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. =

Ext, Affoirs o

Files & Com. -

Gon. Inv. _

Ident.

Insper?;

Intel

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. A

Spec. Inv.

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm.

L ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

28.

32989634

Page

207

CRO 034.546

---

## Page 208

62-176395

1 - Mr

A. Mintz

1 - Ms. J. Cochran

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1

- Ms. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

August 21, 1975

INFORMATION CONTAINED

U.

S. SPATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO

SIVY GOVERUMETIAL OPERATIONS WITH

UNCLES DESPISE TO IMBLIGENOR ACTIVITIES (SEC)

INTERVIET OF FORMER FBI

SPECIAL, AGENTE (SA) RICHARD L.

HEREIN IS

MILLEN BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

On August 11, 1975, Former FBI SA Richard I. Millen

voluntarily appeared at

Fil Beadquarters and advised

• an

FBI representative that he had just been interviered by

Mr. Michael Epstein, an SSC Staff Member, concerning

• the

former FBI invescigation of Martin Iuther King, Jr.

Millen

indicated that this was the first contact he had had with

the FBI concerning this intervier. He was asked if Mostein

vas avare that he, Millen, had not been in contact mith

the FBI prior to the interview.

Millen indicated that

questioning by Epstein developed the fact that Millen had

not as yet been in contact with the FBI. Millen tas then

asked how,

in light of this fact, he and Epstein had

addressed

themselves to Millen's obligations under his

employment agreement with the FBI as relating to the area

of confidentiality.

Millen stated that this matter did not

arise as an issue during the interview and that he, in effect,

hail given no consideration to the matter.

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp.Syst...m

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv.

ident.

Inspaction -

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec.Inv..-

Training

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm. -.!:

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

HH 55138 DooId:32989634

Page 208

Millen indicated that he desired to furnish the

FBI the details of the interview, and arrangements vere

made for Millen to mail to the FBI a statement containing

the intervier details. It should be noted that Millen

resides in Florida and was in Vashington, D. C., for the

sole purpose of the intervie:, having arcived earlier that

morning and intending to fly back to Florica shortly after

Works

1 - 100-106670 • (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

1 - 67-115187 (Personnel File Former SA Richard L. Millen)

STP: 1hb'hà

(10)

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

ENCLOSURE

34=52

---

## Page 209

SETTE SOLECI COLLITITEC O ITIOLLICETOS ACIIVIZTES (SCC)

NO: TREVIE! CE POREN FBI SA BY ESC

the above contact with the FBI.

Hillen was advised by tha

roi conrosentacive that although there tos litile he could

no: do colnilvo to his conloyment agrocroni vich the IDI as

che intervier of him as alreaty conleted, it as indicate?

is hin that current and forner ensloyces of the feI, tho

are regularly beins contacted by the sse for intervier, ene

Firsi contacting the FUI to resolve the matter of recelving

FBI cleacance for the intervier.

illien tas senirced thai

thore tas also an obligation to the Departmeni of Justice and

that in the ovori ha as in be called back: for aditizonal

incorvic; cither subject in a subezens and/or under oath, it

isold requice n cleerance fron the ittorney General. It ras

siggested to hin that he give this matter che aprconriate

consideration under those clerinstences.

Attiched hereto is a Keror of a statement which

inlion notled to tho FuI nich details the resulto of the

intervier of hin by Testein.

Enclosure

NOTE:

Supervisor S. F. Phillips of the Senstudy 75 Project

was the FBI representative who saw Millen on 8/11/75. Legal

Counsel to Mr. J. B. Adams memorandum, 8/13/75, "Senstudy,"

reported for information purposes the circumstances of the

interview of Millen and it had taken place without prior

advice by the SSC to the Bureau. Departmental officials

were advised and subsequently John Elliff of the SSC Staff

telephonically expressed his regrets to Supervisor P. V. Daly

of the Legal Counsel Division for the interview having taken

place without prior notification to the Bureau. Millen's

statement was received in the mail under cover of a personal

note to Phillips, which note is attached; also attached hereto

is a copy of a reply written to Millen by Phillips. It should

be noted that Millen inquired as to that procedure

he should

NOTE CONTINUED PAGE 3

- 2 =

HH

55138 DooId: 32989634 Page 209

---

## Page 210

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

' RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

NOTE CONTINUED:

follo if he is again contacted by the SC for further

intervier or testimony. Phillips' reply to him was that

under such circumstances he might desire to contact the

Legal Counsel Division by collect call.

Copies of all the current correspondence is being

designated for Millen's personnel file with the suggestion

that due cognizance be taken of this incident in any future

Bureau consideration relative to Millen.

-.

~ 3 -

HH 55138

• DocId: 32989634

Page 210

---

## Page 211

:.

The Attorney Goneral

Dircctor

U. S. GINATE SELECT COLLITTEE

INTELLIGINCE ACTIVITIES

(SSC)

1

-Mr.

J. B. Adams

fund fand ford

- Hr.

J. A. Mintz

- Mr.

W. R. Vannall

Mr. W. O. Cregar

Mir. S. I. Phillips

August 11, 1975

8/::

1061.

Enclosed for your infornation are the original of

a monorandum and its attachnent concerning an interview by

Stars Menbers of captioned Committec of FBI Spocial Agent

Boynor Ired Phillips. A copy of the menorandum and its

attachment are also enclosed for forwarding to Ir. James A.

Vildorotter, Associate Counsel to the President.

Enclosures

(1)

62-116395

I - The Deputy Attorney Goneral

Attention:

lichack E. Shahcen, Jr.

Spacial Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

1 - 100-106670

1 - 67-

STP:mig/ant |

(11)

ENCLOSURE

dartin Luther King, Jr.)

(Personnel File SA Seynot Fred Fhillips)

REC.6

62-114-345-522

EX-JUL

* AUG 27 1975

ii,.

UNREC COPY AND SCEY OF

ENCI FILED IN

liste

11

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm!

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst._

Fit, Ators ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED:

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

-HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

Inspection -

Intell.

- DATE 2.23-81 BYSP4S Am/M,

6070

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. -

NG78152989631

TELETYPE UNIT O

Page 211

PIM

Anse

folks.in

406÷99

WOS 5

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

---

## Page 212

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 329896310 Cage /912

---

## Page 213

JFK Law 10(a)1

HW 55138

DocId:32989634

Page 213

---

## Page 214

JEK Law 10(a)1

HIH

55138

DocId: 32989631

Page 214

---

## Page 215

JFK Law 10(a)1

HW 55138

DocId:32989631 Page 215

---

## Page 216

JFK Law 10(a) 1

4H 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 216

---

## Page 217

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 217

---

## Page 218

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 218

---

## Page 219

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 219

---

## Page 220

JFK Law 10(a) 1

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 220

---

## Page 221

JFK Law 10(a)1

HTH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 221

---

## Page 222

JFK Law 10(a) 1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 222

---

## Page 223

JFK Law 10(a)1

vs. • «a--d..and-a

HW 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 223

---

## Page 224

JFK Law 10(a) 1

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 224

---

## Page 225

JFK Law 10(a)1

17H 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 225

---

## Page 226

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 226

---

## Page 227

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 227

---

## Page 228

JFK Law 10(a) 1

• H₩ 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 228

---

## Page 229

JFK Law 10(a) 1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 229

---

## Page 230

JFK Law 10(a)1

136

DocId: 32989634

Page 230

---

## Page 231

JFK Law 10(a) 1

MW 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 231

---

## Page 232

JFK Law 10(a) 1

ITH 55138

DocId: 32989631 Page 232

---

## Page 233

JEK Law 10(a) 1

ITH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 233

---

## Page 234

JFK Law

10(a) (a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 234

---

## Page 235

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 235

---

## Page 236

JFK Law

10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 236

---

## Page 237

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 237

---

## Page 238

JFK Law 10(a)1

| NW 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 238

---

## Page 239

JFK Law 10(a)1

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 239

---

## Page 240

JEK Law 10(a)1

ITH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 240

---

## Page 241

JFK Law 10(a)1

NH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 241

---

## Page 242

NN 55138 DocId: 32989634

Page 242

---

## Page 243

JFK Law 10(a)1

HTH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 243

---

## Page 244

JFK Law 10(al1

÷ HH 55138

DocId:32989634

Page 244

---

## Page 245

JFK Law 10(a)1

IN 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 245

---

## Page 246

JFK Law 10(a)1

NH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 246

---

## Page 247

FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN

JOHN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRMAN

PHILIP A. HART, MICH.

HOWARO H. DAKER. J

NN.

WALTERIF. IVONDALE, MINTY.

BARHY GOLOWATER, A

WALTER D. MUDDLESTON, KY. CHARLES MCO MATHIAS, JR., MD.

ROBETT MORGAN, M.C.

RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, PA.

GARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

United States Benate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RES, 21, JATH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

ADVICE OF RIGHTS

Before you answer any questions, we would like to advise

you of your rights.

This interview is completely voluntary and you have a

right to leave without being interviewed, or to terminate

the interview at any time.

You have the right to remain silent.

1

Although the Senate Select Committee is not a prosecutive

•body, it is possible that anything you say might become

available to a prosecutive body and could be used against

you in court.

You have the right to consult with an attorney before any

questions are asked, and you may have an attorney here with

you during questioning.

If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed

for you before questioning if you wish.

If you decide to answer questions without an attorney

present, you, still have the right to stop answering ques-

tions any time; of you may defer your answer until you

consult with an attorney.

WAIVER OF RIGHTS

I have read this statement of rights and I under-

stand what my rights are.

I am willing to be interviewed

and to answer questions without a lawyer at this time. No

promises or threats have been made to me and no pressure or

coercion of any kind has been used against me.

witness aT

Witness:

Thou la

Signed

Date

Heg. 1, 1919

#MDR 16

HH 55130--D00Id-32989634- Pate--247 -

---

## Page 248

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FEE

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW

for review but not transmitted,

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

If a document was made available

note.)

INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY OTHER

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/74/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

The

Attorney General with a copy for forwarding to

SSC

the

Fhite House

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Herorandun rsporting results of on Interview by SSC Staff

lembers of Incumbent Spectal Agent of the FBI Seynor Fred

Fh$111ps

and item number

if in response

of (name),

initiative, subpoena, eternal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

Codeword)

U

?. Keed under fento rote phase giate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

Suzveillance, electronic

#MDR 16

ATT TEOTHATTON CONTAINED

1r10002

8.

SUMMARY (see

reverse side before completing this item)

Former FBI investigation of Martin Luther Kinz, J5-

62-116395

FNK: Enk

64)

ORIGINAL VIA I ISON TO CENIRAL, COMANITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITE SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS YELLOW

5.098

3791 (6-751

NH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 248

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

---

## Page 249

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.'

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

intervene so current ox. some.

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

the and

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 249

---

## Page 250

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON

INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Ms. J. B. Hotis)

August 15, 1975

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. P. Thomas

DOWNGRADED TO

SECRET

Per.

Datell

Reference is made to the August 5, 1975, request of

the SSC for FBI materials.

Enclosed is a menorandum for your approval and forwarding

to the Committee in response to Item II in referenced request,

on which a deadline for delivery of materials was set for

August 15, 1975.

Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the

memorandum prepared for the Committee.

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

1 - The

Deputy Attorney General

REC-56+-1011

Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

11113?.

JPT:1hb/hb

(10)

S, F. Phi

18970

5

AUG 27 1975

NOTE

Pori, 40

Assoc. Dir.

CONFIDENTIAL

Dep. AD Adm. - Q

Dep. AD Inv. -

The material being furnished to the SSC with the

Asst. Dir.:

enclosed IJM relates to the so-called "Official and Confidential" files,

Comp. Syst, designated "non-derogatory,' which have previously been examined

Ext. Affairs by the SSC Staff, and to records of interviews conducted by the

fi Inspection Division of individuals considered by the SSC to

Ident.

Inspection

- Intelt?

possibly have information feserding the handling of the o &

NOTE CONTINUED PAGE '2

Laboratory _

Plan. & Evalot

Spoc. Inv..

Training →

Legal Coun. V

Telephone Rm.

Director Sec'y

HH

N!!:

MAIL

ROOM

32989634

Page

TELETYPE UNIT

250

GPO 954-546

---

## Page 251

r.

The Attorney General

NOTE CONTINUED:

CONFIDENTIAL

files following the death of the late Director J. Edgar Hoover.

Exact copies of the materials being furnished to the SSC are

being maintained in the office of the Senstudy Project and a

detailed record has been made of the materials furnished.

Arrangements have been made for a representative of the Legal

Counsel Division to deliver the attached memorandum, as tell as

the materials, to the Connittee on 8/15/75. In the material being

furnished to the SSC is a memorandum from W. R. Wannall to C. D.

Brennan, dated 3/25/71 entitled "Director's Meeting 3/31/71, With

Attorney General, Mc. Richard Helms and Admiral Noel Gayler,"

originally marked "June" but not classified under the existing

regulations. In this memorandum reference is made to a NSA

operation, code name 'Minaret." On 8/15/75, Ken Harris, NSA,

informed Liaison Officer V. Weimar that the code

name "Minaret"

is classified "Confidential, XGDS 2, Indefinite," and any

narrative concerning "Minaret" is classified "Top Secret." The

code word has been excised from the copy of the memorandum being

furnished to the SSC and the memorandum has been stamped "Iop Secret."

Classified by 6875, XGDS 2, Indefinite.

COITF IDENTIAL.

* к.

- 2 -

WH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 251

---

## Page 252

62-116395

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr.

J.

A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr.

August"

Tb 1975

U.S, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

#MORIE

ALT, INFOR

KARSIN IS UNASSERE

DATE /1

Reference is mace to the August 5, 1975, request:

by the SSC for FBi materials.

Item II., A., requested delivery of materials

contained in the so-called "Official and Confidential" files,

Jesignated "non-derogatory," previously examined by the SSC

Staff, under the folloving seven headings:

1. Agreement between FBI and Secret Service;

2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3. ''Black Bag" Jobs;

4. Expansion of FBI Foreign Intelligence

Coverage;

5.

Intelligence Goverage - Domestic and

Foreign;

6. Directives (60);

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dop. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

7. Cook, Fred (52).

Processing of the requested material has been

Files & Com. -

completed and till be delivered to the Conmittee on August 15,

1975, with this communication.

Hide

Inspection

intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. m

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. _

Director Secy -

55138

(9)

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

MAIL ROOM

DocId: 32989634

Page 252

TELETYPE UNIT I

5

C90 351-545

---

## Page 253

SLATE SELECT COLMITICS QUI IFELLICS CE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Itco II., Be, roquasted "sunnaries or roteul on

intaryiano conducted by the raI Inspaction Division regarding

handlina nf the so-callod "Official ard Conficontial" files.

Forty-chico forns I0-302 and one "inscri" rolatine to interulera

oi 34 individuals, responsive to this request, bave beer

cocenbled and -1ll bo collarci to che Coralttoo on Zugust 15,

1975, "ith this oceanication.

1 - The Attorney General

a 2=

HW

55138

DooId: 32989634

Page 253

---

## Page 254

ain'

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

[ Memo

• Report dated 8/15/75

Gaption or Dodenate Select Committee.

8/5/75 request: Item II, A & B

FBI

Originating Office:

Delivered by:

Paull Daly

-Dato: 8/15/75

Received by:

Title:

SSE

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

#MORIG

55138 DooId: 32989634

Page 254

T0244ba 11.365-571

---

## Page 255

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

FB2

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

• If a document was made available

I DOCUMENT !

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

9/15/75

3.

TO WHOM PROVIDED (check

appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Lenorendus and enclo

state verbal

formal request, other-"

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

etc.)

UNFORMS, ON Center

Codeword)

SS6 Jetsor 0/5/75 Mum II, A+S

?. KEy orde fent fore pppropriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

#MDR16

Inforcatica handling

10-11-00 5p-2 ALm 786

8. SUMMARY (see

reverse

side

before

completing this item)

Ilaterials delivered to the SSC of the so-called

"Otficial and Confidential"' files desigasted "non-derogatory.

62-116395

(FMK: Fnk

(4)

ORIGINAL, VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COLMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

379| (6-75)

i HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 255

TREAT AS YELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

: 562-16-385-571

---

## Page 256

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g.,

restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 256

---

## Page 257

precede fathe

amnall

Teezan

tuackellord

=1.1. 7. 300211

in sia Felton

CONTILERO

1

7/50/43

a. do ito do suiton

Lion Jan

it a

Do to settus

Tude te to ltealty Cointlaro documents reterred to stali

webers of the senate select Co nittee (iSc) lor review only in the

Til Bullding, on 7/20, 25, 28/15. Courencing 7/17/15 SC Stalt we-

bers were peruitted to revler unexcised Exhlbits i-i of the deterson

report ou T-3I Cointelpros, These exhiblts are bigily sanitized individual

write up of proposale for actions sub uitted under tue 3lack ixireulet,

my lal, •uite sate, isctalici orkers roaty and Coriaolsi Farty

colatelazoe. lancor anen itu a prlor ugtec ent uctecco to Cepart-

ent and Sis, ticee shull mEsvers were furnished xerox coples of

original serials in the various Cointeloros that they deeded necessaxy

for tueir review to I0O a 4111, ILL.

These coples of original 2st

serials were excised to protect sensitive sources and intoruatlon iro.

otaer agoncies nuere there were senalivities.

allacied or lue illo are d cogies ou excited serlals is

taê; Fitte mic arailaote lotu 110 on 7/24/75 relatin to tie Slack

intre aist and New Leil cointelpros, 45 costes relatin, to tie Comunist

Party, do, Cointelaro witch were nue availaole 1/25/15, anal ao copies

oi excised serials regarding due slack taire dist oloteloro wnica were

wade tallaule to the SC for revies in the fLil Juilding on 7/24/75.

#M DR16

10113100 SPZALM/7TG

ORIGINAL FILED IN

/1-02-710055

"(Scustady) - 75-

1 - 100-440000 (Slack atrealst)

1 - 100-149u76 (9e7 Lcit)

I - 102-0-104 (CPOt)

2: 14)

(I2)

1:1. 3;

"RECONDED

• AUG GO 1975

#$ 4 AUG 2 9 1975

5519

DocId: 32989634 Page 257

---

## Page 258

it: cobileloros

C2-110009

for record carpostig luc following red stall members

revieved the avore docu- ents on the dates noted: satsara janoli,

Lester sidell, ary peored and Artour i Jelierson. In each instance

prior to the revier ol a docusent by tae St°, it was approved for

review by the go by lue appropriate responsole Section Chief.

1C310N:

Lionce tor informalton

H# 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 258

---

## Page 259

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

U.

SENTATE SELECT COMMITTEE

OST' INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1 - MI. J. B. Arams

1 - Мг.

J.

A. Mint?

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

July 30, 1975

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

(

Enclosed for your information is the original of

a memorandum concerning an interview by Staff Members of

captioned Committee of former FBI Special Agent Jerry D.

•Roseberry. A copy of the memorandum is also enclosed for

forvarding to Nr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to

the President.

in

Enclosures - 2

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSISIED

62-116395

DATE 2.20.8LB: SP40RM

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

6074

Attention:

R. Hilliam O'Connor

Special Counsel For

Intelligence Coordination

1 - 100-106670 (Martin luther King, Jr.)

1 - 67-664783 (Personnel File Forner SA Jerry D. Roseberry)

REC-56

12-1432 570

(11)

AUG 27 1975

REC COPY AND COPY

•OF ENCÍ FILED It

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs _...

Files & Com.._

Gen. Inv..o

Ident.

Inspection -

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv.-

Training

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm.

HH 55138

iy.

DocId:32989634

TELETYPE UNIT O

Page 259

wal.

GPO 054-546

---

## Page 260

62-116395

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

1

- Mr. J. A. Mintz

1

- Mr. W. R. Wannall

1

. - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Ms. S. I. Phillips

July 30, 1975

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

U. S. STATE SELECT COLLIITIBE TO

STUDY GOVERITUATINE, OFERATIONS WITH

Set out bolory is infornation concerning an

interview of former FBI SA Jerry D. Noseberry by SSC Staff

Members.

Roseberry served in the FBI Fron Hay 4, 1959,

until his resignation on February 20, 1970, He entered

the

FBI in a Clerical

capacity but vas an SA at the time of

his resigration. His FBI service las interrupted by his

resignation l'ebruary 23, 1962; he vas reinstated July 2, 1962.

On advance notice from lic. lichael Epstein, SSC

Staff Member, Roseberry was advised that he vas to be

interviered at 10:30 a.I., July 15, 1975, in the office of

Serator Herman I, Talmadge, 275 Peachtree Street, ".3.,

Atlanta, Georgia 30301. Rosebersy vas informed by the FBI

that he was being released from any applicable ensloyment

agrcerent for purposes of the SSC interview concening the

forner IBI investigations of lartin Wither King, Jr.,

Stanloy David Levison and the Southern Christian Leadership

Assoc. Dir. -

Conference (SCIC). It las explained to Roseberry that he

Dep. AD Adm. -

had the right to counsel; hostever, the FBI vas unable to

Dep. AD inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

provide private counsel.

Roseberry vas also told that there

Admin.

vere certain privileged areas concerning thich he would not

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

be required to anster questions. These areas concerned

Filosa com - Intornation which night divulge the identities of TBI sources;

Ident.

information relating to sensitive nethods and techniques;

Inspection -

je l

Intell. —

1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

Poore tal. _ 1 - 67-564783 (Personnel File Former SA Jerry D. Roseberry?

Spec. Inv.-

Training -

Legal Coun. -

SFP: 1h6/hb

OKIGINAL AND ONE COPY, TO AG

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MATTO ROOM

SEE NOTE PAGE 5

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

GPO 954-546

---

## Page 261

.*

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

information which might adversely affect ongoing FBI

Investigations; and intornation which originated with other

agencies, including foreign intelligence agencies. Roseberry

was informed that if he desired the presence of an FBI

representative in Atlanta for consultation purposes, one

Tould be supplied on his request He then nade a request

for such assistance.

An FBI representative met with Roseberry In Atlanta

on July 14, 1975, at which time Roseberry vas Inforned that

if a question arose during the interview in one of the

areas set out above, he had the privilege, before replying,

of consulting with the FBI representative, tho would not

accompany him to the interview but sho would be available

in the FBI Atlanta Field Office located in the same building

where the interview was to take place.

The details of the intervier, as voluntarily

furnished by Roseberry, are as follows.

Roseberry vas interviered in Senator Talmadge's

office for the approximate period 11:30 a.m. to 12:15 p.I.,

July 15, 1975, by SSO Staff Members Michael Epstein and

Mary Debreo.

Roseberry was advised that he tas entitled io

an attorney if he desired one and that whatever he said

might be used against him. He told Ipstein that he was not

Interested in having an attorney. The following details

are not necessarily in chronological order.

Roseberry was asked his current employment which

he gave as follows. He has been employed since 1970 as a

Security Supervisor for the Southern Eell Telephone Company

in Atlanta. On request, Roseberry rurnished the name of his

current superior as theodore A. King, General Security

Namager. Asked how long King has been In this position,

- 2.

HH 55138

DocId:32989634 Page 261

---

## Page 262

SOTATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVILT OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Saked I Theodore 4. Kins had anything to do with the wiretap

concerning Martin luther King, Jr., Roseberry advised that

he did not inow.

It was indicated to Rosebercy that the

SSC might want to talk to Theodore A. Kino.

Roseberry was asked when he started in the FBI

and he said it vas in 1959. On request, he advised that his

initial assignment was a clerk at FBI Headquarters; that he

resigned in 1962 to return to Atlanta; and later in 1952 tas

reinstated in the Atlonia Field Office, He later served as

• an Investigative Glerk and as a Complaint Clerk. He vas

asked when he worked on the Martin Luther King, Jr., technical

surveillance and he said it was in 1964 and 1965.

Asked if

he did this work in the office, he said that he did not.

Asked where the worl took place, he said it was in a building

across the street from the Atlanta Field Office. Roseberry

was asked if the FBI had any monitoring plants in the Atlanta

Field Office and he said he did not know.

He was asked tho

in the FBI Installed the technical surveillance and he said

he did not know.

Roseberry was asked who the technicions in

the Atlanta Field Officewere at the time of the King investi-

ration. He said there vere two Radio Operators named

Ray Stenger (phonetic) and Jerry Hedrick (phonetic), but

that all their work encompassed radio repair.

Roseberry was questioned as to there King resided

when the electronic surveillance was in effect on him and he

said he did not knot. He was asked what other technical

surveillances the FBI had in effect at the time besides those

on King and the SCLI. Roseberry replied that there was a

technical surveillance on the Student Konviolent Coordinating

Conmittee. Roseberry told his interrogators that he had

appeared in Federal Court in Atlanta on one occasion in the

past in connection with a Selective Service Act case with

ramifications relating to the Student Honviolent Coordinating

Committee.

-3.

HH 55138 DooId:32989634 Page 262

---

## Page 263

SETATE SELECI COMMITTEE ON EXTELLIGENCE ACLIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Roseberry was asked if he had discussed his

curcent intervier with anyone in the FBI. He advised that

on the evening of July 11, 1975, he had been given some

procccural information relating to the interview by

Nic. Debruler, the Special Agent in Charge of the Atlanta

Field Office. He was then told that he could receive addi-

cional information from the Legal Counsel Division of the

FBI in the event he vas contacted for interview by the SSC.

On July 12, 1975, Roseberry spoke to an SA in the legal

Counsel Division

preparatory to making hinself evailable

for the intervier.

This conversation tas tclophonic and

procecural in nature. Epstein inquired as to vhether

Roseberry had asked for assistance und advised that he had

and was given the nane of an FBI representative who vould

likoly be the person who would be available for consuliation

at the time of the interview, in the event Roseberry desired

such consultation help. Subsequently, on July 14, 1975,

Roseberry talked briefly with the FBI

representative available

in Atlanta for this purpose, SA Seymor Fred Phillips.

Roseberry was asked whether he had discussed with Phillips

the Incts relating to the King investigation. Roseberry

said that the case itself had not been discussed and that

they had talked only about the parameters of the forthcoming

Interview and the privileged areas Roseberry vas not requires

to respond to questions.

Roseberry vas questioned as to whether he had

taken any equinment to the monitoring plant when he worked on

the King case and he said that he had not. Asked whether the

tapes utilized were new or used tapes, he said that he did

not know. Asiced whether the monitoring installation was ever

inspected by TBI Headquarters personnel, he said that he did

not knot. Roseberry tas asked tho he had reported to when

he worked on this case, and he said that it was to the Agent

• 4∞

WN 35138

DocId:32989634 Page 263

---

## Page 264

...to

SENTATE SELECT COLBITITEL OIT INTEULIGLLCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INDERVIN DE FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

who was in charge of the case at the time, 11 Sentinella.

He was asked if there vere any monitoring installations in

the Aclanta Field Office, and he said he did noü Inow.

Rosebersy was asked if he knew why the Bureau had

a vicetap on King.

Roseberry advised the purpose of the

vireta, vas to determine King's contacts and novements

bacauso of a concem about some of the people vho were the

threatened.

Roseberry responded that he did not know but

assumed that the FBI would have advised King because It

vas the FBI practice to advise individuals who night be the

targets of such threats. He was asked who had told him the

reasons for the King investigation, and he stated that he

did not remember. He was asked 1E

the clectronic coverage

of ling's residence vas a telephone tap or a bug, and he

responded that he knew only of a celephone tap; he did not

Inor of any bug.

Roseberry tas asked what the policy of viretapping

as of the Southern Bell Telephone Company. iloseberry

responded that the only natters he 1s involved in in his

employment relates to court-ordered tiretaps. He vas next

ashed about national sceurity vicetaps made without couct

order. He responded that he nover handled any of this nature.

He ras asked as to his company's policy on court-ordered

wiretaps, and he referred Epstein to the American Telephone

and Telegraph Company in Mow Yorl. City.

NOTE:

Debriefing of Roseberry as reported herein was by

S. F. Phillips of INTD ho, on prior approval, traveled to

Atlanta to be available for consultation purposes. Phillips

was not called upon by Roseberry during the interview.

-5-

HH 55138

DocId:32989634 Page 264

---

## Page 265

TE:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

1. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term.

If a document was made available

for review but not transmitted, so

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

I TESTIMONY |

OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

7/30/75

3. TO WHÓM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The

Attorney General sith a copy for forwarding to

the Waite Hoise

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

L'enoronduz reporting results of an interview by SSC Staff

Marbers of forner Special Agent of the FBI Jerry D.

Roseberry.

O (list dat

wise state verbal reques

and item,

if in response

formal request, other-

initiative, subpoena, etc.)

5. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION

(enter

U,

C,

S,

TS or

Codeword)

?. KEed"uRder fent for emphasiegiate key words from the list provided separately:

if key words

not listed

Survetllance, electronic

16-1-00 SP2ALm./276

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Former FBI Investigations of Martin luther King ix.,

Stanley David Ievison and Southern Ghristian Leadership

Conference.

62-726395

FMK: fnk:

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL, COUMUNITY INDEX,

IN CONNECIION WITH SENTUDY 75

5187

379| (6-75)

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 265

TREAT AS VELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

ENCLOSURE 62-116 385-570

---

## Page 266

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of

the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 266

---

## Page 267

The Attorney General

Director,

FBI

0

U.S. SETATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON /INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1 - Mc. J. B. Adams

1 - Mr.

J. A. Mintz

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 19, 1975

1 - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. L. F. Schwartz

Enclosed for your information is a menorandun tith

enclosure concerning an intervier by a representative of the

captioned Committee of former FBI Special Arent George C. Moore.

Single copies of the memorandum and

• its enclosure are also

enclosed for forwarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter,

Associate

Counsel to the President.

Enclosures

÷4

62-116395

ALI. INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN, IS

UNCLASSIFIED

DATE 4-14-8/

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

1 - 67-

(10) *

(Personnel File Former SA George C. Moore)

REC-56

EX-LUe

9 AUG 2719T.

ENCLOSURE

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

"Dap. AD Inv. _

Isst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com..-

Gen. Inv. -

ident. a

inspection

Intell.

aboratory

*Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. _

Training

Legal Coun.

elephone Rm. _

irector Sec'y _

MAIL ROOM

8011 3UG&8 1975989634

TELETYPE UNIT

Page 267

40638%

GPO 054-346

---

## Page 268

• .

62-116395

1 - Mr.

J. B. Adams

1 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

1 - Ms. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. L. F. Schwartz

August 19, 1975

U. S. SETATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERMUNTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGEIICE ACIIVITIES (SSC)

RE: ITERVIENT OF FORMER FBI

SPECIAL AGENT (SA) GEORGE C. 7

MOORE BY SSC STAFF MEMBER

ALI, INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN, IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE 4-14-81 BYS/

-27

This memorandum and its enclosure contain

information concerning an interview on July 28, 1975, of

former FBI SA George C, Moore by Mr. Loch Johnson, SSC Staff

Member.

Mr. Moore entered on duty with the FBI in a

clerical capacity on "ovember 3, 1941, and was appointed an

SA. October 18, 1943. With the exception of a period of

military leave between July 22, 1944, and October 1, 1946,

Moore served continuously with the Bureau until his retirement

on July 31, 1974.

On advance notice from Mr. Johnson, Mc. Moore ras

advised that Ix. Johnson desired to intervie him at

Mi. Moore's convenience relative to his knotledge of the

Huston Report. Mr. Moore was advised that he was being

released from any applicable employment agreement for purposes

of the SSC intervie, concerning the Huston Report. It ras

elained to him that he had the right to counsel; ho ever,

the FBI tould be unable to provide private counsel. He ras

Assoe. Dir. also advised that there vere certain privileged areas

Dep. AD Inv. =

concerning which he would not be required tu ansver questions.

Asst. Dir.:

These areas concerned information which might divulge the

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -man

identities of FBI sources; information relating to sensitive

will

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

methods and techniques; information which might adversely

Ident.

affect ongoing FBI investigations; and Information originating

Inspection

with other agencies, ineluding foreign intelligence agencies.

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. _

1 - 67- (Personnel File Former SA George C. Moore)

1C.

Spoc.Inv...

Vi

Training

IFS: 1hb lhb

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm. _

(9)

SEE

NOTE

PAGE 2

Director See'y _

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

GPO 954-546

MH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page

268

ENCLOSURE

---

## Page 269

SENATE, SELECT COMMITIVE ON INTELLICKICE ACTIVITIRS (SSE)

BE: INTERVILI OF FORHES FAI SA BY SSC

HI, Moore vas adriand that 1E be tasired en PAI raprasentativa

to be availablo for consultation at the tira and place al

the intervier, one roule be supplled. ta, leore advised that

he muld appenciate having a tureda raptosentativa cvetlablo

at the tien of ble Intervior, Arcangerones vers dude raereby

Bhe Intaruley was subarquently cenducteù by Me, Jobason In

as office sunniled by the 85C on July 28, 1975. 34 LeOn I.

Schuatts accortanted He. Moore to the Intravlen but tas not

present during the Interylan.

On degust 15, 2975,

He. Moore voluntailly furnished

the attached nanorancss stilet

he propazad sebaequent to bla

Intervies with Mr. Johnaan.

Zaclosura

MOTE:

Enrmer SA Monre's menorandum concerning the intervie:

voluntarily furzished to SA Schrarts.

55138

DocId:32989634 Page 269

---

## Page 270

CONFRENTIAL

10-11-601

FmDK/6

*SP 2 AUMIZTG

CLASS - 14-8

REASON-FCIM 35,

DATE OF RAVIEW 8-18-45

For purposes of identification in this memorandum,

my name is George G. Moore, former Special Agent of the FBI

having retired July 31, 1974. My address is 6715 Horth 27th

Street, Arlington, Virginia, telephone number 533-8288. In

vier of the fact that I have been interviewed by the Senate

Select Committee (SSC) concerning matters involving my

activities while an FBI employee, I am making this intervier a

matter of record for the information of the FBI by my own

volition.

MH 55138

On July 28, 1975, I appeared at the new Senate Office

Building for a 2:00 p.m. Interview with Mr. Loch Johnson, a

Staff Member of the Senate Select Committee, concerning the

Huston paper.

Although the interview was originally set up for

2:00 p.M., ve spent a total of 45 minutes looking for an office

space in which to hold the interview. Mr. Johnson was consider-

ably embarrassed with the snafu of his clerical staff not

providing him with room keys in the former Carroll Arms Hotel

already occupied by other Staff personnel. After approximately

30 minutes, I suggested that perhaps we would save alot of time

AFPROPRIATE AGENCIES

ALL INFORMATION CONCAINEDID FIELD OFFICES

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

ALVISE RY ROUTING

EXCEPT WHERE SHOWN

NES) DECI

ANNE VENTIN:

OTHERWISE

DocId: 32989634

Page

41-8

---

## Page 271

if he conducted the interview in the park across the street.

He seemed receptive to this suggestion; horever, ve could not

Find a park bench. We proceeded to Senator Church's office

and arrangements tere made to use the Senator's personal office

located in the Capitol building itself.

At the beginning of the intervier, Vir. Johnson did

not place me under oath or indicate that I tas under subpoena.

He also did not advise me of my rights and right to counsel,

although he was avare that a representative of the Bureau

(Supervisor L. F. Schwartz) was standing by in the Senate

Office Building for consultation if needed by me.

The folloring vere key points which I recall covered

during the intervier.

Initially, he asked me for a brief statement of uy

background which I provided. He was very much interested in

knowing the extent of my acquaintanceship with Mir. Huston

prior to the June 8, 1970, (a Monday morning) leeting in the

Director's office. I informed him that I had met Huston no

more than to times prior to that meeting and possibly once

when I had briefed him at Mr. Sullivan's suggestion in

Division 5 conceming extremist activities covered by the

-2 .

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 271

---

## Page 272

section under my supervision. Such briefing was not a long

briefing and I diù not recall any further details including

who might have accompanied Mr, Huston. Next, he desired to know

if I had ever prepared a paper for Mr. Huston which indicated

the extent of the extremist threat in the United States. I

did not recall preparation of any such paper at this time other

than the overall paper prepared at the Director's (and President"s)

instructions in the Sumner of 1970, known as the "Huston Flan."

He asked me that I considered to be a true assessment

of the extremist threat at that time and I informed him the

paper which vas tritten tas an accurate statement of the threat

as known to the FBI together with the input fron other intelligence

agencies.

He seemed interested in the foreign aspects to this

threat and asked for my assessment in that regard and endeavore

to have me label it as significani, nonsignificant, moderate

and similar adjectives. I refused to label it and stated that

the threats spoke for themselves and it vas for others to

interpret in that regard although I did point out that there

was and has been and possibly still remains a degree of varying

- 3.

BA MANIA

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 272

---

## Page 273

* :

CONTINAL

proportions of foreign influence in these movements. I

emphasized that the word was "influence" and not knowledge

of any control.

He asked whether I felt the President was correct

In believing that the quality of FBI intelligence in this area

was low.

I informed that it was my recollection that President

Johnson likevise had been critical of the overall data of

FBI Intelligence in this area and ve in the FBI who collected

such intelligence knew fully well that our intelligence product,

although good in some respects, left much to be desired. In

other words, there vere definite intelligence gaps.

"ext overall point covered was the meeting in the

Director's office on lionday, June 8, and his desire to receive

from me a feel of the tenor of the meeting since I was one of

the participants.

I informed him of the nature of my attendance which

was a last minute notification by Mr. W. C. Sullivan tho

stopped by Branch Chief Joseph A. Sizoo's desk (which I was

manning at the time) and asked me to go with him across the

street to the Director's office. He did not tell me why and

did not brief me ahead of time. After getting there, it was

-4 -

MW 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 273

---

## Page 274

CONFIDE STAY

obvious I was taken in order to prepare a memorandum of the

event. (This was obvious to me since I was much the junior

man in attendance.)

Mr. Johnson was interested in a rundown of the

meeting itself to the best of my recollection and I provided

him a few of the details including the fact that Admiral Noel

Gayler (phonetic) of the fational Security Agency (ITSA) was

about five minutes late and the Director started the meeting

on time without him. Also, during the meeting the Director

gave a very brief rundown on the mandate of the President,

which was to identify intelligence gaps through a cooperative

effort letting the chips fall where they may and affording

the President a good hard-hitting report which would allow

him an opportunity to make some hard decisions. Somewhere

in this meeting the comment was made about a lack of cooperation

on the part of the agencies, and the Director looked Mr. Helms

in the eye and said that he was not aware of any lack of

cooperation on the part of any of the agencies and Mc. Helms

agreed with the Director in spite of the fact that llaison had

been curtailed a short time prior to the meeting by the Director

with CIA.

- 5 -

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 274

---

## Page 275

CONNY

an i tines

One other item of interest furnished was

the fact

that Admiral Gayler used this meeting as an opportunity to

make a request of the Director that he hoped the FBI would

help NSA out by engaging in surreptitious entries regarding

embassies. The Director gave him no hope in this regard

pointing out the risks involved and the climate of the times.

dictated that this matter be given very careful study before

any hasty decisions tould be arrived at. # (5)

Mr. Johnson asked IF I was aware of a flap which

occurred at this meeting in which Mr. Huston allegedly informed

the Director that the guidelines for the study were broader

than announced by the Director in his presence. I recalled

no such flap and informed Mr. Johnson that a memo was vritten

by me of the meeting which was sent to the Director which

hit the highlights of the meeting. He asked if this vas

available in Bureau files and I answered that I assumed so.

Mr. Johnson was very much interested in the meetings

and discussions which took place at Langley, Virginia (CIA's

hone), and wanted to know who desired meetings to be held there.

I emphasized to him that I was not privy to any plans of that

sort and only functioned from that time on as a member of the

= 6 =

WH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 275

---

## Page 276

CONFYSSTING

working committee primarily because the Section I headed

was involved in domestic extremist activities.

He desired to know of Huston's input into these

meetings and of any flaps which occurred and in particular

he mentioned someone told him of a flap involving Army. I

informed him that Huston did not seem to be running the meeting

as Sullivan seemed to be doing that in his position as Chairman

and I knew of no flaps that occurred vith any members.

I also mentioned in response to a question that

Mr. Helms did attend the first meeting at CIA Headquarters

and merely welcomed us to their space and offered any assistance.

He left and never returned after a few remarks.

Johnson asked several questions involving the format

of the report utilizing options for the President and asked

for my knowladge of how such a report vas decided upon. I

told him I had no knowledge; he was asking the wrong person,

He commented about Part 3 being only one recommendation

and wanted to know if that was unusual and I responded that I

had never been invoived in a paper for the President before

and I did not know whether such vas unusual or not. I also

commented that I felt that the options in and of themselves

= 7 -

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 276

---

## Page 277

.".

were in the nature of recommendations at the President's l

pleasure.

Johnson was especially interested in whether other

agencies were desirous of using this whole operation as a

means of utilizing illegal techniques which vere at that time

denied and also if the FBI representatives Ilkewise approached

this task vith more than usual enthusiasm with the expectance

that they too would be allowed to use techniques some of which

were obviously Illegal.

I told him that I could not speak for other agencies

and that there were better people to speak with on that score

but as far as my feelings as a representative of the FBI were

concerned, we all approached it as a difficult task involving

hard work, in vier of a short deadline, and a project on vhich

the President, the Director and Assistant Director Sullivan

vere riding herd. At the same time, from a personal standpoint

I felt that "hope always springs eternal" and that maybe, , in

view of the high-level interest involved here, from an overall

standpoint we might be provided vith some investigative

tools which would allow us to do a better job. At no time

- 8 -

HH 55138 DocId:32989634 Page 277

---

## Page 278

..

COMETAL

was there any discussion to my recollection as to whether

any technique was legal or illegal bearing in mind that

everybody at the table was a professional from an intelligence

point of view who made up a working committee and the matters

of that nature vould be policy matters involving officials

on a cabinet level or higher.

I was asked the question as to whether or not

extremist field personnel ever utilized covert mail examination

techniques. I told Johnson I felt he was getting beyond the

scope of my clearance from the Bureau for this interview and

he stated that he did not think so since one of the options

involved had to do with this matter. I inforned him cather

than belabor the point that we in our Section's

work did not engage in this technique but I vould refuse

to go any further with respect to my knowledge.

He asked me if I had any knowledge of what developed

after the report was prepared, apparently approved by the

Fresident, and then later recalled. I told hin that I had

no knovledge of a personal nature and very poor hearsay, which

was gathered through rumor, and later accounts from the press

that the Director allegedly took the letter to the Attorney

General who had it recalled.

- 9 -

HIT 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 278

---

## Page 279

..".

CIEN

He also asked me for my knowledge of how the

Director made his footnote decisions. I told him I did rot

know but felt that lir. Sullivan was the person who would know

and have first-hand knowledge. He asked me if the Director

discussed it with Mr. Jolson. I told him I did not know

but that he may have in view of the relationship.

He also was interested whether I had knowledge of

a difficult situation which Mr. Sullivan might have been in

at this time as chairman of a committee acknowledging intel-

ligence gaps on the part of the FBI and also occupying a

position thich would entail loyalty to the Director. I

agreed that Mr. Sullivan vas in a delicate position.

He also asked me fos my opinion as to that lesson

could be learned from the Huston papers and I stated that

very little, if any, good could be learned from the papers

themselves but I did hope that after Congress was finished

with its investigation brought about by the Watergate syndrome

that the best interest of the country would be preserved in

the sense that ve don't loose sight of the fact that there

are legitimate national security interests which need to be

protected and that there will come a time in the future when

- 10 -

HH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 279

---

## Page 280

i pro 1.da

=.

the people who are in power, whether it is Executive Branch,

Congress or both, will be asking the same questions with

respect to intelligence gaps and will have to make some hard

decisions.

He also asked me if there was any advice I could

give as to reforms which could be initiated and I responded

that they were talking to the wrong person about reforms. It

seemed to me as

if they had enough reformers in Congress

today.

He did not ask me who was present at the meetings in

Langley as he said he had full knowledge of those who were

present but he did name to me those he felt vere present and

at that time asked me if there vere any individuals in addition.

I mentioned that I was not sure whether I. J. Smith was present

or not. He mentioned D. E. Moore, W. C. Sullivan, C. D. Brennan,

R. D. Cotter, I. 0. Gregar and F. J. Cassidy, as vell as myself.

He also mentioned that he had heard that the report

consisted of 90 percent Bureau information and asked me 1f

that was correct. I said I had never put a percentage figure

on the information but knew that the report was top heavy

on Bureau intelligence which indicated intelligence gaps on

- 11 -

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 280

---

## Page 281

CONFERA

the parts of CIA and others. He asked me 1f I felt that

there was a need for an evaluation type of committee to

overlook domestic intelligence in the future. I said "yes"

I felt that there was a need but felt that such a committee

should be set up with Congress as a joint committee with the

Executive Branch. He asked why and I replied that if such a

committee had been set up, I wouldn't be in Washington, D. C.,

today giving an interview at this time and I thought for the

good of the country there should be in the future such a plan

instituted.

Finally, he asked me for my opinion as to whether

security rork should be taken out of the hands of the FBI

and put somewhere else. I said that this vas going a little

far from the scope but maybe it did bear on the "Huston Plan."

My reply vas that I felt from a historical vierpoint the

FBI's record in the security and intelligence field has

withstood the test of time and was an outstanding record under

the direction of Mr. Hoover and felt that if their reputation

vas not unduly damaged by Congress the security work definitely

should remain under the confines of the FBI. He said my

comments were interesting since I was the first retired person

- 12 -

NH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 281

---

## Page 282

to leave FBI with these feelingsand I replied that I did rot

know who he talked with and certainly felt that Mr. Kelley

vould take the same stand if he was called for intervier. I

further stated that there is a definite relationship between

security investigations and criminal violation responsibilities,

many of which go hand in hand and as the terrorist threat

continues in this country and possibly explodes, ve vill see

more of a reason for security and criminal divisions to work

closely together.

NOT A

- 13 -

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634

Page 282

---

## Page 283

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

TO :

" Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

FDI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

I. HOW PROVIDED (check appropriate term.

If a document was made available

review but not

transmitted, so note.)

DOCUMENT

BRIEFING * INTERVIEW

I TESTIMONY |

OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/19/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The Attorney General with a copy for forwarding to

the

White House

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive

data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

5. WiSe

Menorendun reporting results of an Interfew by SSC Staff

Membex of former Special Agent of the FBI George C. Moore

anana motiat we suppose

to formal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

initiative, subpoena, etc.)

INFORMATION (enter

U, C,

TS or

Codeword)

vonder fent fore phaseriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

Intolligence collection

10-11-00 SP2ALM/316

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completine this item)

Concernirg the FBI and the so-called Fuston Eeport

62-126395

(EMK: Emi:

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS YELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379| (6-75)

IH 55138 DocId: 32989634 Page 283

---

## Page 284

273-10043

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

"FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. Il actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

HH 55138

DocId: 32989634 Page 284

---