## Page 1

14-00000 •

104-10215-10146

2025 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992

ATTACHMINT #2

S-E-C-R-E-T

TRAINING REPORT

1653

TEAM/ GROUP: PERUMEN II

(211 hours, full-time)

12 July - 73 August 1966

Student: FRANK

COURSE OBJECTIVE AND CONTENT

This course is designed to train indigenous personnel in paramilitary

resistance activities and intelligence collection operations in denied

Approximately 70% of the student's time is devoted to practical

work and field exercises and 30% to the theoretical aspects essential for

& logical understanding and application of training covered during the

course.

* U - Unsatisfactory

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Performance is'so low in relation to requirements

of the work as to be unequivocally below minimum

standards.

W - Weak

A - Adequate

P - Proficient

S - Strong

Ichieved minimum standards, but less than adequatc

in terms of indigenous personnel participating i

the program).

Has achieved the basic level required. Satisfactory,

characterized neither by deficiency nor excellence.

More than satisfactory.. Has acquired a solid

beginner's proficiency.

This rating may be

Interpreted as representing "average" on our rating

scale.

Exceptional proficiency, characterized by thorough-

ness, initiative, originality,

and an exceptional

student understanding and application of paramilitary

resistance activities.

0 - Outstanding

Performance is so exceptional in relation to require-

ments of the work and in comparison to the performance

of other students doing similar work as to warrant

special recognition.

# Modification of the Office of Iraining standerd rating scale at the

specific request of JMIAVE.

S-E-C-R-E-T

---

## Page 2

12208430/25960252.5r746

FRANK

S-E-C-R-E-T

HOURS

RATING

1. MAP READING (ABILITY TO REPORT LOCATIONS

USING GRID COORDINATES)

2. NAUTICAL CHARTS

3. WEAPONRY (U.S. & FOREIGN)

4. CLANDESTINE MOVEMENT

5. RESISTANCE ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS

6. AMBUSH TACTICS AND OPERATIONS

7. RAID TACTICS AND OPERATIONS

8. CACHING

9. CLANDESTINE MOVEMENT LINES (E&E)

10. OBSERVATION AND TEPORTING TECHNIQUES

11. LEADERSHIP TRAITS AND CAPABILITY

12. OPERATIONAL PLANNING ABILITY

13. SKETCHING

14. SABOTAGE (SEE ATTACHED STB REPORT)

15. TARGET PHOTOGRAPHY

16. AIR RECEPTION ACTIVITIES

17. WEAPONS QUALIFICATION

(TEST RESULIS ATTACHED)

8

P

$

P

Comments

Pistol

Rifle

SMG

20

don-Applicable

sharpshooter

Sharpshooter

OVERATI, PERFORMANCE

RATING TETTER

Rating takes into account trainee's effectiveness, such as performance

In operational skills, tactics, techniques, leadership, planning, teawrork,

motivation and limitations.

2

S-F-C-R-E-T

---

## Page 3

14-00000

FRANK

S-E-C-R-E-T

The ratings above, and narrative coments hereunder, are derived fron a

synthesis of all evaluations submitted on each respective trainee by the

instructor staff.

overall performance ratings of '1 students in this class vere as follows:

WEAK O ADEQUATE

_ PROFICIENT 6 SIRONG O

OUTSTANDING O

NARRATIVE COMMENTS

Over-all, FRANK was the most conscientious and hardest vorking

student in his class.

His serious attitude and line performance warranted

a highly proficient rating.

In preparation of plans, completion of uritten exercises, and

execution of field problems, he desonstrated a high level of achievement.

During the Ambush Exercise, FRANK had a leadership role during

which he adhered to a detailed plan, exerted good control over the team,

and produced a very successful ambush operation.

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING:

FREPARED BY:

come M. Soreine

JEROME L

GREINER

Project Officer

APFROVED AND FORWARDED:

LUDACEK

8/30/66

3

S-E-C-R-E-I

---

## Page 4

14-00000

FRANK.- Frank was the hardest working student of the group. He con-

sistently af

led himself to all phases of the

aining with equal and

great diligence. However, his practical work, which took him a

great deal of time to perform, was always a little sloppy. When

Frank crimped detonators of threw improvised grenades,

he was

very shaky.

However, he did not seem at all nervous about working

with other hazardous material. He asked many pertinent questions

which contributed to the group's training and always answered test

questions correctly and in detail. He was cooperative and reacted

well to correction.

Some supervision was required since the staff

instructors were concerned about his nervousness with detonators.

His overall performance was rated as proficient.

SECRET

---