HSCA REFERENCES TO OVERSEAS CIA STATIONS.
Originator: CIA
From: BRECKINRIDGE, S.D.
To: DCI
Document date: 02/08/1979
Document type: PAPER - TEXTUAL DOCUMENT

## Page 1

-Q000o

104-10146-10079

• 2022 RELEASE UNDER THE PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY ASSASSINATION RECORDS ACT OF 1992

D. UNCLASSIFIED

ITERNAL

uSE ONLY

CON DENTIAL

ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET

SECRET

SUBJECT: (Optional)

FROM:

S. D. Breckinridge

Principal Coordinator/HSCA

TO: (Officer designation, room number, and

building)

DATE

RECEIVED

FORWARDED

1.

Deputy Director for Operations

2.

Deputy Director for Administration

3.

General Counsel

4.

Legislative Counsel

5.

Deputy Director of Central

Intelligence

6.

Director of Central Intelligence

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

EXTENSION

1046

OFFICER'S

INITIALS

NO.

DATE

OLC 79-0113/8

9 February 1979

COMMENTS (Number each comment lo show from whom

to whom.

Draw a lino across column after each comment.)

Handcarry (call 5441 (Karen)

Handcarry

Handcarry

Handcarry

For concurrence and/or comments.

FORM

3-02

610 'SE

PREVIOUS

EDITIONS

SECRET

CONFIDENTIAL

INTERNAL

USE ONLY

UNCLASSIFIED

---

## Page 2

4-00000

.. i

•.

(

SECRET

....

79-0113/8

8 February 1979

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence

VIA

: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence

Legislative Counsel

FROM

:

S. D. Breckinridge

Principal Coordinator, HSCA

SUBJECT

• House Select Committee on Assassinations References to

Overseas CIA Stations (U

1. Action Requested: That you approve one of the options set forth

in paragraph 11. (U)

2. Background: CIA's participation in the investigation of

President Kennedy's assassination was limited by the pattern of Lee Harvey

Oswald's life.

He served in the Marine Corps in Japan, although he did not

come to the attention of the CIA at that time. He travelled to the Soviet

Union in 1959, returning to the United States in 1962. He did not come

to CIA's attention until his defection was reported by the U. S. Embassy

in Moscow. He travelled to Mexico City in late September 1963, returning

to the United States in early October after a five-day stay. CIA detected

his presence and reported it at that time as a routine CI report because

he contacted the Soviet Embassy. (C)

3. •False allegations by a disaffected CIA employee claiming CIA-Oswald

ties in Japan consumed some of the Committee's time and attention.

They

discredited his testimony, but in the process of discussing it, they talk

about the things he said,

including his duties in Tokyo. (We have never

confirmed the existence of a Station in Tokyo. We would endeavor to have

the Committee sanitize and downplay this section of its report simply.

because of the discredited nature of the witness's testimony.

If this is

unsuccessful, unclassified publication may become an issue. (C)

Oswald's entry to the Soviet Union, with a visa given by the

Soviet Consul In Helsinki, leads to HSCA discussion in its report of

(existence of the CIA Station in Helsinki and the file held on the Consul,

who was KGB.

We believe this can be remedied by sanitization; if not,

it could become an issue if HSCA insists on publication.

22483

ORIGINAL CL BY 13190

O DECL Xi new on February 1985

---

## Page 3

SECRE

5. Oswald's visit to Mexico City and other developments there have

produced detailed discussion of certain events in HSCA drafts. One of

those intended by the Committee for unclassified publication has to do

with a man who made allegations that Oswald received money in the Cuban

Consulate for the purpose of killing the President. This considers the

investigation of the allegation, with criticisms of the performance of

the Agency. It involves detailed reference to the Station in Mexico.

The other section intended for unclassified publication has to do with

a man who flew to Cuba from Mexico City a few days after the assassination

of President Kennedy. Again, there is extensive reference to the role

of the Station.

Another section referring to the Mexico City Station

involves detailed discussion of sensitive sources and methods; the position

on sources and methods is clear, but there is uncertainty in the Mexico

Station aspect. (S) .

The present issue is whether there can be some euphemism for

describing CIA personnel in Mexico City for the investigation, without

specifying that they were assigned there on a permanent basis, or whether

we simply oppose any references. The Committee can be expected to contest

our objections to any references to the Station or CIA's presence there

for the investigation because the story cannot be told otherwise. To omit

such references would mean that these limited sections would probably have

to be deleted or so emasculated as to render them sterile and incomprehensible. (C)

7. The Warren Commission report has only limited references to CIA,

crediting it with reporting Oswald's visit to Mexico City prior to the

assassination, and obtaininig by undisclosed means a photograph of an

unidentified man. Other information from CIA is not specified in the

report; while the press has accurately described those matters, the Agency

has never officially confirmed it. (C)

its communications with Washington:

it has the quality of official confirmation by virtue of being contained

in a Senate report.

The Agency did not contest this at the time.

Further,

the Agency subsequently approved references to the Mexico City Station and

its Chief, in the book published by David Phillips, possibly because

already public in the Senate report. (C)

9. Staff Discussion: Since the Church Committee investigation, and

the approval of the references in the Phillips book, there has been an

increase in the sensitivity of the Mexico City Station.

While CIA has

come under attack in the Mexican Press from time-to-time in the past, the

Station and the COS in particular recently have been the subject of a

running campaign. This is the first time that a COS has been subjected

to a prolonged personal attack in the local press.

Heightened political

controversy within the ruling PRI Party has focused attention on the

Embassy and the Station, with allegations of bribery and other misdeeds

SECRET

---

## Page 4

involving high-level officials. Because of the political discord within

the PRI, certain high-level Mexican officials have at least seen fit to

permit the continuation of this campaign if not supporting and instigating

Their objective is to tarnish the image of other officials who are

political opponents and traditionally have been very supportive of the

Station.

The interest of the United States

in Mexico's gas and petroleum

has heightened sensitivity concerning anything that may affect the

political atmosphere. The official publication by any U. S. Government

entity of material which confirms the presence of CIA operations in

Mexico (past or present) provides new ammunition for renewed attacks on

our Station and causes considerable embarrassment to the GOM.

President

Carter will be visiting in Mexico soon. The president himself has instructed

the Attorney General that there can be no references to the Mexico City

Station in its prosecution of the ITT matter.

While the President can

instruct a member of the Executive Branch on this matter, a formal position

from him on this subject, directed to the Congress, does not have the same

weight. (S)

10. The agreement between you and Chairman Stokes provides that when

we receive an official notice of the intent to publish, you have five days

in which to respond to him if you object.

At present, we have this inform-

ation on an informal basis and the five-day period does not apply. Therefore,

this is posed to you in anticipation of a disagreement if discussions do

not produce a way around the issue. (U)

11. Our options are:

a. To seek some compromise by discussions; (U)

b. Accept some euphemism that suggests the presence in

Mexico of CIA people in 1964 for purposes of the investigation

without specifying that they were assigned there permanently; (C)

c. Categorically oppose publication of those sections

mentioning any CIA presence in Mexico. (C)

12. Action Requested: We intend to pursue option (a), but prior to

doing so, your decision on options (b) and (c) will be necessary to shape

how we proceed. (U)

D. Bue chimily,

S. D. Breckinridge

Distribution:

1 - DCI

1 - R. Holmes

1. - DDCI

• Legislative Counsel

7—ER

1 - 0LC/Subj

1 - DDA

1 - 0LC/Chron

1 - DDO

OLC/SDB/kw - 9 Feb 1979

- OGC Attn: R. Rininger

1 - LA/DDO Attn: W. Sturbitts

1 - 05 Attn: J. Sullivan

SECRET

---

## Page 5

14-00000

Fred Hity.

2/14/79

Legislative Counsel

Date

Ague w. option@.Beforeprocedungtol) 2

would like a crach at cosinin, the headent

Deputy

9 February 1979

Director for Operations

Date

Stan:

Agree with Option c; oppose Option b. Agree to Option a assuming

no mention of CIA in Mexico. At this very moment, the Mexican

situation is super sensitive regarding CIA and we should not further

inflame that situation by admitting to CIA activities in Mexico

City under any guise or name.

da War

eputy Director for Administration

0/12/79

Ince weve exhausted compromise, t

assume we will have to settle for

Option "b" in view of the existing record. Doe

I think the ought to ohject in principle (prins) br

the: 1902p2472

a succes one not bright and fall-bac

Are

soo eleas

breche for haple thr

4a10

Aralistic.

General Counsel

13179-.

Date

SECRFT

---