LETTER:SUBSEQUENT TO OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION ON 16 AUGUST/SUBPOENAS
Agency: CIA
Originator: CIA
From: STOKES. CHAIRMAN, HSCA
To: TURNER. DIRECTOR
Document date: 08/25/1978
Document type: PAPER - TEXTUAL DOCUMENT

## Page 1

JFK ASSASSINATION SYSTEM

IDENTIFICATION FORM

AGENCY INFORMATION

AGENCY : CIA

RECORD NUMBER

: 104-10322-10121

RECORD SERIES

AGENCY FILE NUMBER

CFA

CIA-EXEC REG FILES

DOCUMENT INFORMATION

Released under the John

F. Kennedy

Assassination Records

Collection Act of 1992

Ii44 USC 2107 Note!.

Case#:NW 53320 Date:

06-24-2017

--

AGENCY ORIGINATOR : CIA

FROM : TURNER. DIRECTOR

TO :

STOKES. CHAIRMAN, HSCA

TITLE

LETTER: SUBSEQUENT TO OUR TELEPHONE CONVERSATION ON 16

AUGUST/ SUBPOENAS

DATE :

08/25/1978

PAGES

3

SUBJECTS : HSCA

DOCUMENT TYPE.

: PAPER

CLASSIFICATION

: CONFIDENTIAL

RESTRICTIONS

1B

CURRENT STATUS

: RELEASED IN PART PUBLIC - RELEASED WITH DELETIONS

DATE OF LAST REVIEW

: 03/19/99

COMMENTS : JFK-M-13 : F5: 1999.03.19.17:11:38:810120 : DUPLICATE

OF 104-10065-10039 AND 104-10135-10359. FOLDER

TITLE: I-101A

(FORMER SPEC INTEREST FILE #8)

[R] - ITEM IS RESTRICTED

104-10322-10121

1N 53320

Doc1d:32403675

Page 1

---

## Page 2

Central intelligence Agency

Washingtan, D.C. 20505

D5C22R

ER 78-2313/2

OLC 78-3016

25 AUG 1978

ASCA

12Y

Executive Registry

28-2313/2

Honorable Louis Stokes, Chairman

Select Committee on Assassinations

House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

Subsequent to our telephone conversation on 16 August, at

which time you informed me that subpoenas had been voted by the

Committee for four items of information, the matter has been the

subject of exchanges between your representatives and mine. I

assume that your staff has now made you aware that one of the items

had been reviewed by one of your staff representatives the morning

of the day before you told me the subpoena was voted. Another was

for a memorandum that cannot be located, apparently missing from.

a file that previously had been reviewed by your representatives. I

assume these do not pose a question. The other two items, the subject

of this letter, appear to have developed into a different problem.

One of these two remaining items deals with a history of the

Mexico City Station, covering the period 1947 to 1969. That history

contains only a few pages of reference to the short visit of Lee Harvey

Oswald to Mexico City, and to related subsequent events. These

pertinent pages have been reviewed by your representatives. Other

than these few references the balance of the history deals with

operational and management developments over a 22 year period --

subject matter noi related in any way to the objectives of your inquiry.

In its entirety it constitutes a highly sensitive collection of operational

and organizational information, involving intelligence sources and

methods, that should receive the most restricted handling.

Classitied os 13190

sent Trom general

LEchedule al E.O. 11553

exemption caregury 53111. 62D (3)

automatically

Data lanossibio lo Doloralia»

CONF

1A1

WH 53320 DocId: 32403675 Page 2

---

## Page 3

The other item has to do with the so-called "201 file" of a

Cuban citizen, and in addition a Covert Action operation directed

against several persons, including the subject of the file in question.

The activity transcends the time period of the death of President

Kennedy, its results evidencing themselves subsequently over the

ensuing year and more. The nature of that operation has been

described to Mr. Blakey and Mr. Cornwell. It is unusually sensitive,

the focus of which is well beyond the subject of your irquiry.

We engaged in discussions with Mr. Cornwell, trying in good

faith to arrive at a procedure whereby your staff could have access to

relevant materials, and at the same time limit the unnecessary

exposure of operational activity that is both sensitive and unrelated to

your inquiry. At Mr. Cornwell's request, we took sections of the

history designated by him and made them available for review, with

knowledgeable officers present to discuss with him any questions that

may arise from his review. Similarly, at Mr. Cornwell's directions,

we provided the material from the 201 file of the individual of interest

to your Committee for the period 1 September 1963 through 31 January

1964. Mr. Cornwell was able to review these various materials only

hurriedly on 18 August, and were to be reviewed by him further on his

return from Dallas.

On 22 August Mr. Blakey came to review these materials. He

declined to review the history on the grounds that he should see it all.

Further, Mr. Blakey rejected the principle of any limitation on review

of the 201 file of the person in question. He also insisted on seeing the

separate operational files as well, although advised that the activity was

unusually sensitive and not germane to the subject of your inquiry. In

essence, this appeared to negate the progress made to date.

However,

on 23 August Mr. Blakey returned to the Agency and reviewed the sections

of the history selected by Mr. Cornwell.

A staff investigator accompanied

him and read the 201 file for the period January 1963 through May 1964-

In the absence of any statements on the subject we are left with the

impression that the issue is still unsettled.

As you know, your Committee has been afforded unprecedented

access to the files and information of this Agency. However, the handling

of materials is subject to their bearing on the authorized study and

CONI

ENTIAL

HHT

53320

DocId: 32403675 Page 3

---

## Page 4

GORT

VENTIAL

investigation, subject, of course, to considerations of sensitivity.

Until your subpoena, we were unaware that there was a problem

different from any number of daily working problems encountered

in this inquiry. In fact, as noted, on two of the issues addressed by

the subpoena your representatives already had reviewed available

material. Subsequent to that, the rather detailed exchanges between

your representatives and mine had appeared to have been entered into

in good faith, and we had proceeded accordingly.

I trust that we will have the opportunity to discuss this candidly

rather than under the conditions resulting from the subpoenas voted

by your Committee. Please let me know when you return to Washington

so we can discuss further how we might handle the matter.

Yours sincerely

Lettuna

STANSFIELD TURNER

cc: Honorable Richardson Preyer

Honorable Samuel Li. Devine

Distribution:

Original - Addressee

1 = DCI

1

• DDCI

1

- ER

- OGC

_ DDO

- DDA

1 - Mr. Shepanek

1 - SA/DDCI

I - OLC Subj

1 - OLC Chrono

OLC/SDBreckinridge:baa (24 Aug 78)

COmKOO TAL

HH 53320 DooId:32403675 Page 4

---