Document date: 00/00/0000

## Page 1

File #:

Heleased under the John F

Kennedy Assassination Records

Collection Act of 1992 |44 USC

2107 Note]. Case#:NW 65360

Late: 09.22-2022

62-116395

Serial Scope:

500 THRU, 535

537. THRU 541

543 THRU 546

NW 65360

Docld:32989627 Page 1

---

## Page 2

The

Attorney General

Director, FBI

0. 1

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

NTCLLIGENCE ACIIVITIES (SSG)

Adams

2 - Mr?

(1

Mintz

Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. J. Cochran

August 18, 1975

1 - Mc. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. 0. Gregar

1 - Mr. J. P. Thomas

#MDR16

ATTY TORETON CHINATNES

HISWOIST

Reference is made to the August 5, 1975, request of

the SSC for FBI materials.

Enclosed is a memorandum for your approval and i-

forwarding to the Committee in response to Item V in referenced

request, relating to access to screen material by August 18, 1975.

Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the

nemorandum prepared for the Committee.

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael I. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

JPT: 1hb 1hb

(11)

REC 267-16 325-5460

EX 104

AUG 21 197'

"ENCLOSURE IN BULKY ROOM'

tic. Dir.

3. AD Adm.

p. AD Inv.

' Dir.:

min.

He np. Syste

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com..

Gen. Inv. -

ldent..

Inspection -

Intell.

val.

Sird

IPT.

GTO 954-546

т. -

22. 5M97530011

NW 65360-Dockd:g298962 Wage 2

---

## Page 3

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - ME. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. J. Cochran

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

62-116395

#MDR16

SPH ALMITG

August 18, 1975

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. J. P. Thomas

U.

S. SENATE SELECI COMITTEE 30

10-1-00.

STUDY GOVEREMEITAL OFERATIONS ITTI

RESPECT TO INTEILIGECE ACIIVIIIES (SSC)

Reference is made to Item V of the August 5, 1975,

request by the SSC for access to screen FBI materials.

Materials considered responsive to the SSC request

have been assembled and are available for revier by SSC

Staff Members in Room 4171, JEll Building, regezding the

Following parts of Item V:

Part A. Materials pertaining to Irs. Claire (Anna)

Chennault and Spiro I. Agner.

Regarding Item V., A., 6.,

Information pertaining to actions taken by the "hite House

as a result of information contained in the summary letters

described in Item V., A., 4., is not contained in FBI files.

Regarding Item V., A., 7., the FBI has no record of any former

or current Special Agent (SA) named (71111am Jackson who could

have performed the tasks enumerated in the SSC request.

However, at the time that SA. Phil Claridge vas assigned to

the Albuquerque Field Office, there vas also assigned there

a Snecial Agent maned Corcon Jackson, rov retired.

The last

knom residence for SA Claridge, ho retired June

29, 1973,

1s 619 16th Street *.W., Albuquerque, Ier Mexico.

The last

kno » residence for SA Jackson 1s 1537 Wellesley Drive ".C.,

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Albuquerque, Heir lexico.

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Part B. Materials pertaining to Yeoman Charles I.

Comp.Syst.u

Radford.

Ext. Affairs.

Goe., Inv..

•Ident.

(10)

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

Inspection

Intelle

Laboratory

Plon. & Eval. -

pec. Inv.-

pining.

y Coun.

lone Rm. -

MAIL ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

ENCLOSURE

NNW65360 Docld:32989627 Page 3

GDO 951-345

---

## Page 4

SENATE SELECT COMMITTRE ON INTELLICNVEN ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Patt. E. Materials relating to the Kational Security

Regarding this request;

it should

be noted that no central file or individual case regarding.

the "watch list" has been maintained by the fBI.

Accordingly,

a diligent search of logical files and inguirtes of persennel

possibly knowledgeable of information pertinent to the SSC

request have been conducted, Matertals secured by this effort

heve been assembled in chronological order; in order to

Facilitate Staff review.

Part Fd

Matertals pertaining to authorization for

FBI contacts with, dissemination of FBI Information to, receipt

of information from,

and requests by the FBI for action by

the Spectal Services Staff of the Internal Revenue Service:

Part Ge

The "Handbook of Technical Equipment,"

Pursuant to agreement between Mr. John T. Elliff of the SSe

and Mr. Willtam Q. Croger of the FBI, the aforementioned

handbook, which deals enttrely with technical Infornation, is

avallable for review by Mr.

ellift to determine its relevance

to SSE interests. Should Mr. Filiff determine that the

handbook or specifie portione thereof are relevant, and request

pror review by fBI Laboratory personnel,

to determine the necessity for security classification of

requested materials, will be reguired before delivery:

Part H.

Materials pertaining to FBI astivity with

respect to the lational Environmental Teach in (alse Inown

as "Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

Part I. Materials pertaining to the origin and

Implication of any decleton to gather Intelligence on "Women's

Liberation" in the FBI Philadelphia, Pield Office from 1969

to the present.

edenessed or lot teched so he rever ene mouse,

. 2

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 4

---

## Page 5

SENATE SELECT CONMITTEE ON INTELLICENCE ACTIVITTES (SSO)

Part K. Performance-ratings (form FD-185) of

several named current or former FBI employees Regarding

this request, pursuant to agreement between Mr. Elliff, supca,

and Ms. Gregar, supra, the personnel file of former SA George

berley; containing forms PD-185 regarding Mr. Berley, will be

aveilable in the possession of a representative of the PBI

for diseussion and temponses to speetfie questions Mr. E1116f

way desire to ask regardine the perforance retings contened

theretn

Pert L The current office assignment or lest keown

address of Individuals listed In Part K. of the request:

Ao previously indicated, the aforementioned matertals

will be avattable in Room 4171, JEH Bullding.

Part C, of the referenced request concerned surreptittous

entries carried out by the FBI from January 1, 1960, to the

present.

Part D. of the referenced request concerned matertals

pertaining to any juriadictional agreements, agreements of

coordination.

or other agreements between-the FBI and any other,

Federal, state or local agency with regard to the conduct of

and disseminatton of Information fron surreptitious entries.

The Department of Justice has previously informed the SSe thet

it has the matter of surreptitious entries under study and the

FBI has been instructed by the Department of Justice to withhold

responses to inquirtes concerning surreptitious entries intil

Departmental study of the matter has been completed.

1 - The Attorney General

3

M 65360. Docld 32989627: Page 5

---

## Page 6

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTICATION

WASHINGTON, D. C: 20535

SELECT COMMITTEE

Addressee:

SENATE

ULTR

[X] LHM

Senate

[Report dated -

8/18/75

aption of Document•

Select Committee on Intelligerce

(sc request.)

Activities. (Item V. of 8/5/73

Originating Office:

Delivered by

Received by:

FBI

and Kaaly

Just Mane

- Date: 8/18/25-

Title:

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

#MORIG

ATL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

62-16 395-546

ENCLOSURE

65360

Docld:32989627 Page 6

---

## Page 7

11. .

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FOI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

If a document was made available

2. DATE PROVIDED

NEL DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY

JOTHER

8/18/75

3. tO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

• IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer

nterviewee, testifier and subject.

Memorandum

if in response to

formal request, other-

SSC letter 8/5/75

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, c,

S,

T'S or

Codeword)

7. Key words lint for emphasiegiate key words from

sno line provided seroemoli"

words not listed are

Operating Procedures

Intelligence collection

10-11-00 S@2.Mm17,5

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Made available to appropriate personnel of the SSC Staff, for

review at FBI:Q, nateriols pertaining to lies, Glaira (Anns)

Chennault and Spiro I, Agner. Addresses Furnished of two former

Speciel Agents of the Albuquergue, New Mexico office, Material,

pertoining to Jeonan Charles E. Indford, Yaterials relating to

the National Security Agency watch list, laterials pertaining

to authorization for FBI contacts with, dissomination of FBI

Information to, receipt of information

from, and requests by the

I61 for action by the Special Services Staff of the Internal

Revenue Service, Infe"Handbook of Technical Egulphent," Mnterials

pertaining to FBI activity with respect to the Hational Envivon-

mentel Teach-in, April 2k, 1970. Materiale pertaining to the

origin ond inplication of ony decision to gather intelligence

"Honen*s Liberation' In the IBI Ihiladelphia Field Office fron

1969 to the present. Idditional S/C letters and netorando.

Porformance ratinga

Crech 1D-105) ot several haned current or

fogues M07 employees.

62-726395

EMK: Fok (4)

TOLEN AN

VETI OW

3791(6-75)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL CONMUNITY INDEX

NW 65360 Docld:32989621

I GENECTION WITH SENSTRUSTE A MIE

---

## Page 8

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink..

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

pi.

MMM 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 8

---

## Page 9

JFK Law 10(a) 1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 9

---

## Page 10

JFK Law 10(a)1

Takin

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 10

---

## Page 11

JFK Law 10 (a)1

MV 65360 Doeld:32989627 Page 11

---

## Page 12

JFK Law 10(a)1

•----___

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 12

---

## Page 13

JFK Law 10(a) 1

MW 65360_Docld:32989627 Page 13

---

## Page 14

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

J. S. SEITATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1 - Mc.

J.

Adams

1 - Mr.

J.

A.

Mintz

1 - Mc.

W.

R. Wannall

1 - Mx. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. I. F. Schwartz

August 7, 1975

#MDRIG

SPiZALM 1G

10-11-00

Enclosed for your information is a memorandum with

enclosure concerning an intervier by a representative of the

captioned Committee of forner EBI Inspector Donald E. Moore.

Single copies of the memorandum and its enclosure are also

enclosed for forvarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate

Counsel to the President.

Inclosures - 4

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

1 - 67-

LF'S: 1hb lhb

(10)

(Personnel File Former FBI Inspector Donald E. Moore)

EX 101

REAL L' 25: 543

9 AUG 21 1975

Assoc. Dir..

Dep. AD Adm. -

11,1*

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

ENGLOSURE,

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Iny.-

Ident. -

Inspection.

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. __

Training -

Legal Coun..

Telephone Rm. -

MATO BOM L

NW 663 60 636232989621 Page 14

TELETYPE UNIT O

131

w.D.

G7 954-546

---

## Page 15

62-116395

1 - Mc. J. B. Adams

1 - Mc.

J. A. Mintz

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. L. F. Schwartz

Auguet 7, 1975

ALMI

U. S. SETATE SELECI CONMITTEE IO

STUDY GOVERIMENTAL OPERATIOUIS MITH

RESPECT TO INTELLICSACE ACTIVIZIES (SSG)

RE: INTERVIET OF FORMER FBI

INSPECTOR DONALD E. MOORE

BY SSC STAFF LEMBER

-116

This memorandum and

its enclosure contain

infornation conceming an interview on July 28, 1975, of

former FBI Inspector Donald E. Moore by Kr. Loch Johnson,

SSC Staff Member. Me. Moore entered on duty with the FBI

on larch 10, 1941, and served continuously in a variety of

assignments until

his retirement on June 29, 1973.

On advance notice from ir. Johnson, He. Hoore tas

advised that it. Johnson desired to intervier him at li. Ibose's

convenience relative to his knowledge of the Huston Repost.

Ir. loore was advised that he was being rcleased from any

applicable employment agreement for purposes of the SSC

interviey concerning the Buston Report,

It was explained

to him that he had the right to counsel; horever, the rBI

¡ould be unable to provide private counsel. lle vas also advised

that there vere certain privileged areas conceming thich he

rould not be required to anster questions. These areas

concerned infornation which might divulge the identities of

Assoc. Dir.-

IBI sources; information relating to sensitive methods and

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv. —

techniques; information which night adversely affeci ongoing

Asst. Dir.:

FBI Investigations; and information originating with other

Admin. -_

Comp. Syst.=.

agencies, including foraign intelligence agencies. lc. Koozc

Ext. Affairs -

ras advised that is he desired an FBI representative to be

Files & Com. --

Gen. Inv..-

available for consultation at the time and place of tha

Ident.

intervie, one would be supplied. Mir. Moore cormented that

Inspection -

Intelle we

Laboratory =

Plan. & Eval. ..

1 - 67-

(Personnel File Former FBI Inspector Donald E. Moore)

Training -

Legal Coun. -

(9)

Telephone Rm. -

Director See'y -

MAIL ROOM

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 15

TELETYPE UNIT

ENCLOSURE,

SEE NOTE PAGE

62-116574504

44058 831.596

---

## Page 16

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE OIT INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSG)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI INSPECTOR BY SSC

this would not be necessary but indicated that if necessary

he might contact a Bureau representative telephonically if

a matter requiring consultation should come up during the

Inte tern

intervier. Iir. Moore subsequently contacted la. Johnson and

made arrangements to be interviered in Mr. Moore's office on

July 28, 1975.

On July 31, 1975, Mi. Moore voluntarily furnished

the attached memorandum which he prepared subsequent to his

interview with I. Johnson.

Inclosure

NOTE:

luntarily Mixe'd tens un Secent the interview tas

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 16

---

## Page 17

Interview of Donald E. Moore by

Mr. Loch Johnson, Senate Select Committee

July 28, 1975

i"?"

;

Mr. Johnson stated at the outset that this was an informal

interview and he did not place me under oath. He asked about my

background which was provided him and included the fact that I

served in the FBI from March 10, 1941, until my retirement at

the end of June 1973.

The interview concerned the so-called Huston Committee

and he asked if I knew Tom Charles Huston before the Committee

was established. I said I recalled meeting Huston once, in Bill

Sullivan's office, but I didn't recall when this was, but it was before

the Committee was formed. In response to questions, Mr. Johnson

was informed as follows:

I was aware of the meeting at the White House attended by

Director Hoover, Mr. Helms, Admiral Gayler and Gen. Bennett.

I was probably aware the meeting was to take place before the

meeting date but I can't recall this. (He said the meeting was

held June 5, 1970.) I was not at a meeting held in Mr. Hoover's

office June 8 but I recall hearing about the meeting, probably

from Bill Sullivan. I don't recall a meeting held in the Domestic

Intelligence Division after this at which Sullivan, Bill Cregar,

George Moore, Fred Cassidy and I were present. I did attend the

initial meeting of the Working Group headed by Sullivan and was

present because Sullivan asked me to be there. I remember Sullivan

and Cregar were at the meeting and I thought one or more other FBI

representatives were present.

He mentioned George Moore and

Fred Cassidy were at the meeting.

I recall Mr. Helms and Mr. Angleton from,CIA were present

but did not recall the names of others including the representatives

from NSA, DIA and the military services. I recall Sullivan chaired

the meeting and that Huston sat at the opposite end of the table.

Either Helms or Sullivan announced that Helms probably couldn't

stay for the entire meeting but I don't recall Helms leaving, although

he did not sit directly at the conference table.

#MDR16

"TON CONTA SNID

CLASSIE/ED

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 17

ENCLOSURE, + 62-116375-543

---

## Page 18

I can't recall the conversation at the meeting but think that

Sullivan outlined the request of the President to study means of

getting better intelligence information on new left activities and

violent protest movements in the US, especially with regard to

possible foreign support. I think Sullivan probably outlined areas

of concern and asked representatives present to document where they

felt intelligence was lacking, how it could be obtained, who should

obtain it and what was needed to obtain it. I said I couldn't at this

date recall specific observations or proposals and rather believed

the purpose of the meeting was to outline the general problem and

ask the representatives to document these and come in with specific

recommendations at a subsequent meeting. I am certain Mr. Huston

spoke about the purpose of the meeting but I can't recall his comments.

This was the only meeting of the Working Group I attended.

I told Mr. Sullivan that if agreeable with him I would not attend

subsequent meetings and I thought the FBI had several representatives

present and that the

thrust was on new left and related activities. As

I recall he said "suit yourself." Johnson pressed me on this and I

told him this was what I expressed to Sullivan but I also was somewhat

uneasy after the first meeting as I did not believe Mr. Hoover was

aware of collection efforts that were likely to be recommended. I

could not state what FBI members attended subsequent meetings but

I believe Charles Brennan and Bill Cregar, and of course, Bill

Sullivan, attended as well as some other representatives.

I can't say who drafted the report but was sure it was under

Sullivan's direction. During the period of the meetings Deke DeLoach

had retired and Sullivan had been appointed Assistant to the Director

and moved from the 9th & D Building to the Justice Building. I

don't recall when Mr. Hoover's objections to certain of the

recommendations were added.. I can't say whether I saw the report

prior to the objections being in it but may have; I do recall seeing

the report after the objections were in it. I don't know whether

Mr. Hoover told Sullivan to put the objections in it but presume

Sullivan knew Mr. Hoover's views and put the objections in on this

basis. I could not answer the question as to whether Mr. Tolson

was the person responsible for having the objections made but felt

he would have objected to the initial recommendations.

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 18

---

## Page 19

I did see the letter from the White House saying the report

had been approved. I believe it was signed by Huston and stated

the President had approved the recommendations. I was aware

Mr. Hoover had either written or seen Attorney General Mitchell

expressing his reluctance and was aware the White House letter was

withdrawn. I din't know why it was withdrawn other than this

occurred after Mr. Hoover went to the Attorney General.

Mr. Johnson asked certain specific questions during or

after the above discussion. He asked what covert mail coverage

was involved since CIA in 1970 was engaged in covert mail inter-

ception. After checking with Mr. Leon F. Schwartz of the FBI,

Mr. Johnson was advised that while I had been released from my

pledge of confidentiality by the FBI in general with regard to the

Huston Committee this matter was under review by the Department

of Justice and I had not been released from my pledge on this

aspect. A similar answer was given to the question about what

was meant by the removal of restrictions on the use of surreptitious

entry oi embassies io obiain crypiographic maieriais.

Mr. Johnson asked if I thought the Huston Committee had

been instigated by Bill Sullivan to more or less force Mr. Hoover

to take a more aggressive stance in intelligence collection. I

answered that I would not like to speculate on this and I could not

make a definite statement yes or no.

He asked why the Working Group met at CIA as opposed to

the FBI and whether this had special meaning. I answered that I

did not think so, that the US Intelligence Board was headed by the

Director of CIA, was concerned with intelligence collection and

met at CIA and also meeting arrangements could probably be better

arranged at CIA in view of parking, conference rooms, etc.

He said Admiral Gayler had stated that he and his predecessor,

Gen. Carter, had tried to get Mr. Hoover to provide more support to

NSA with regard to Communications Intelligence and asked if I was

aware of any such efforts, and if they were in person or in writing.

I said I was aware that Gen. Carter and Adm. Gayler had asked for

support and I believe they might have seen Mr. Hoover personally

and perhaps had written him.

- 3 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 19

---

## Page 20

'OTE: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

SNI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

appropriate term. If a document was made available

so note.)

¡ DOCUMENT

BRIEFING 7 INTERVIEW

TESTIMONY | OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

3/7175

3. ТО WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The Attorney General with a copy for forwarding

to the thite House

HSC

•• IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents;

five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject.

Memorandua reporting results of an intervlew by SSG

Staff Menbers of former FBI Inspector Donald

E. Moore

to formal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

subpoena, etc.)

INFORMATION

(enter

U, C,

coden say

TS or

NA

,.Is one it to meate key words from the list provided separately; if key

words

not listed

are

#mDR16

Intelligence Collection

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completine this item)

10/11100. SPE ALM 116

Concerning the FBI and the so-called Huston Reporte

62-116395

FUK: file

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COLANITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT A3 VELLOW

379 | (6-751

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 20

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

ENCLOSURE

62416395-543

---

## Page 21

274-10033

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HS) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

1a pronated, at tat shout be more end a sure a regate:.

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 21

---

## Page 22

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INYESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 1 4 1975

RE

22

NR D12 NY CODE

15: 08PM

TO :

FROM:

TOP

UR GE NI

- 14 - 75 PLQ

DIRECTOR, FBI (62-116395)

SAC

NEW

YORK (105 - 146601)

#MDR16

CRET

DECLASSIFIED MY SPE ALM

11560

07 11-28-00

ATT N:

INTD, W. O. CREGAR

SE NST UDY 75; IS-R

THERE FOLLOWS A PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION

PROVIDED BY SPECIAL AGENT (SA) JAMES P. KEHOE TO STAFF

MEMBERS OF SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON AUGUST 12, 1975. COMPLETE

DETAILS WILL BE PROVIDED TO THE BUREAU WHEN THEY ARE RECEIVED

FROM SA KEHOE'S ATTORNEY.

THREE

SUBJECTS WERE DISCUSSED BY SA KEHOE AND THEY WERE

SAM SURVEY, SUN SURVEY, AND

IT WAS STATED

COVERAGE WITH REGARD TO SAM SURVEY, in

THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS RECOLLECTION THIS BEGAN

ABOUT 1959 AND WAS BELIEVED TERMINATED IN 1963. IT BEGAN AS A

SURVEY TO OBSERVE THE OUTSIDE OF THE ENVELOPS DESTINED TO VARIOUS

CITIES IN EUROPE, LOOKING FOR INDICATORS WHICH WOULD LEAD TO MA

LOCATION OF SOVIET ILLEGAL AGENTS• AT A LATER POINT IN TIME

COVERAGE WAS ALSO MAINIAINED ON CERIA IN ADDRESSES IN EUROPE

KNOWN TO BE MAIL DROPS

UT

TED BY THE SOVIET

INTELLIGENCE

REO.20

THE

- 554

SERVICE

(SIS) • THE ACTUAL

SCRUT I NY

OF

I WAS T

CONDUCTED AT

RETAIN

AUG 21 1975

COPY

PERSON

PATITE IN BETTERPE

8 4 AUG\2 6 1975

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Aăm

Dep.-A.D.-Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection

Intell. WRiNHO

Lab ratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -.

Training --

Legal Curt

Telephoze Ku. =

Director SEc'y

Page 22

---

## Page 23

PAGE IWO 'NY 105-146601 TO

KENNEDY AIRPORT IN A ROOM AT THE POSTAL AIR MAIL FACILITY.

CERTAIN CONSTANI CITIES WERE EXAMINED AND OTHER CITIES WERE

SELECTED ON A VARIABLE BASIS. WHEN LETTERS WERE OBSERVED THAT

WERE BELIEVED TO MEET THE CRITERIA THEY WERE BROUGHT BACK TO THE

NEW YORK OFFICE (NYO> WHERE THEY WERE OPENED AND PHOTOGRAPHED

BY THE AGENT CONDUCI ING THE Z COVERAGE. THE VOLUME WAS VERY

SMALL, PROBABLY CONSISTING OF ABOUT TEN LETTERS IN A SIX MONTH

PERIOD. A DESCRIPTION OF IHE MACHINE UTILIZED IN THE OPENING WAS

PROVIDED AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT WHEN A LETTER, BELIEVED

TO HAVE BEEN SENI BY A SOVIET AGENI WAS OBSERVED, PHOTO COPIES

WERE PROVIDED TO HEADQUARTERS IN WASHINGION, AS WELL AS, AN

INVESTIGATIVE FILE BEING OPENED IN NEW YORK CITY (NYC). THE SIZE

OF THE SQUAD HANDLING IHIS TOTAL OPERATION WAS ESTIMATED TO BE

ABOUT TWENTY MEN. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE POSTAL EMPLOYEES

WHOSE NAMES WERE NOT RECALLED MERELY PROVIDED THE MAIL POUCHES

AND WERE NOI PRESENI IN IHE ROOM DURING IHE SCREENING PROCESS.

IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT ANY MAIL REMOVED AND BROUGHT TO THE NYO

WAS RETURNED TO THE AIRPORT FOR DISPATCH ON THE NEXT OUTGOING

FLIGHT, TO THE CITY OF DESTINATION.

MM 10400 Dould 2982627 Rage 23

---

## Page 24

PAGE THREE NY 105 - 144061 TO

GRET

WITH REGARD TO SUN SURVEY IT WAS STATED THAT IHIS OPERATION

WAS RUN BY THE SAME SQUAD BUT THAT IN THIS OPERATION THE ONLY

MAIL SCREENED WAS MAIL ADDRESSED TO THE UNITED NATIONS (UND AT

A POSI OFFICE BOX IN GRAND CENTRAL STATION. THE SCREENING TOOK

PLACE IN A ROOM PROVIDED BY THE POST OFFICE AT GRAND CENTRAL

STATION AND IHE PURPOSE WAS TO OBTAIN MAIL WHICH MIGHT BE.

ADDRESSED TO SOVIET MEMBERS OF THE UN AT THIS BOX NUMBER • THESE

LETTERS WERE ALSO RETURNED TO THE NYO AND OPENED AND PHOTOGRAPHED

IN A SIMILAR MANNER. IN THIS INSTANCE, PHOTOGRAPHS WERE NOT

FORWARDED TO HEADQUARTERS BUT WERE FORWARDED TO THE INDIVIDUAL

CASE FILE OF THE SOVIET NATIONAL AND THE RESULTS OF THE MAIL

INTERCEPT WOULD BE REPORTED TO THE BUREAU AT THE NEXT REPORTING

SCHEDULE FOR THAT PARTICULAR CASE. IT WAS ESTIMATED THAT SUCH

COVERAGE RESULTED IN THE OPENING OF ABOUT FIVE OR SIX LETTERS

A DAY.

WITH REGARD TO Z COVERAGE IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT SA KEHOE

HAD NO DIRECT KNOWLEDGE OF IHIS OPERATION BUT HAD BEEN PRESENT

IN THE ROOM, IN THE NYO, WHEN MAIL WAS OPENED. NO ESTIMATE COULD

BE GIVEN OF THE INCLUSIVE DATES OF COVERAGE OR IHE VOLUME OF MAIL.

---

## Page 25

va:}

PAGE FOUR

NY 105 - T TOP

CRET

7

, BUT IT WAS STATED THAI ALL MAIL TO THE SOVIET MISSION TO THE

UN (SMUN) WAS OPENED AND PHOTOGRAPHED IN THE NYO AND THAT THIS

MAIL WAS PROVIDED BY POSTAL OFFICIALS AND THAT AFTER PHOTOGRAPHING,

THE INFORMATION WOULD BE PROVIDED TO THE INVESTIGATIVE CASE

FILES.

THE NAMES OF SOME INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYED IN THESE THREE

OPERATIONS WERE PROVIDED AND THE THOUGHT EXPRESSED THAT ALL

THREE OPERATIONS MAY HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED AT THE SAME TIME AND THAT

THE DECISION TO CONCLUDE THE OPERATIONS CAME FROM WASHINGTON.

IT WAS STATED THAI SA KEHOE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE AS TO WHICH

OFFICIALS IN WASHINGION APPROVED THE ORIGINAL PROGRAMS OR

TERMINATED THEM, BUT IT WAS FELT THAT THE ONLY PERSON WHO COULD

GIVE APPROVAL TO COMMENCE AND TERMINATE WOULD •HAVE HAD TO HAVE

BEEN FORMER DIRECIOR HOOVER • OTHER QUESTIONS, SUCH AS DID THE

AGENT KNOW SPECIFIC NAMES, WERE ANSWERED EITHER AFFIRMATIVELY OR

NEGATIVELY, DEPENDING UPON THE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE NAMES RECOG-

NIZED WERE POSTAL INSPECIORS, AND QUESTIONS SUCH AS WAS THERE

COOPERAT ION BETWEEN THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) AND

THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) IN THESE OPERATIONS

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 25

---

## Page 26

4129% 10

PAGE- FIVE NY LOS L448& IOP

SECREI

WERE ANSWERED NEGATIVELY. QUESTIONS AS TO KNOWLEDGE OF THE CIA'S

MAIL SCREENING OPERATION WERE ANSWERED IN EFFECI THAT SA KEHOE

GENERALLY HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THESE OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WHAT

HE READ IN THE PAPERS.

A DIRECT QUESTION WAS ASKED IF SA KEHOE WAS AWARE THAT A

PIECE OF CORRESPONDENCE HAD BEEN FOUND IN THE MEDIA BREAK-IN

INDICATING THAT MAIL OPENINGS WENI ON AS LATE AS L970.. THE

ANSWER WAS GIVEN THAT HE HAD READ THIS STATEMENT IN THE PAPERS,

AND II WAS THEN ASKED HOW HE WOULD EXPLAIN THIS. HE REPLIED THAT

HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THIS WHATSOEVER., BUT THAT IF THE BUREAU

ISSUED A STAIMENT ADVISING THAT ALL MAIL OPENINGS CEASED IN L966,

THEN THERE WAS AN EXPLANAIION, BUT SA KEHOE WAS UNAWARE OF IT.

A QUESTION AS TO WHAI SPECIFIC INDICATORS WERE LOOKED FOR

IN SAM SURVEY WAS NOT ANSWERED ON THE GROUNDS THAT SUCH INFORMATION

LREPRESENTED A SENSITIVE TECHNIQUE THAT WAS STILL VIABLE.

AT NO POINT IN THE PROCEEDINGS DID SA KEHOE EXCERCISE HIS

RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVILEGE UNDER TE FIFTH AMENDMENT.

GLASSIFIED BY 6444, XODS & AND 3, INEFINITE,

END .

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 26

---

## Page 27

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

: Mr. J. B. Adams

Fone: 2eeae court

SUBJECT:

SENATE SELE

ICT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

DATE: 7/8/75

#MDRIG

SPGALMIZTG

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD A

AD Inv.

Shing re

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

Inteil.

Laboratory

el Coln.

Training

Telophone Rm. _

Director Sec'y -

Emal to

Mr. Callahan requested that a research be conducted to

determine whether the FBI or the Department of Justice would be

authorized to pay for private counsel for employees called to testify

before the Senate Select Committee and who desired private counsel.

I advised Mr. Callahan that the position of the FBI and the

Department is that we could not provide counsel directly to the individuals

because of the potential conflict of interest between the rights of the

individual and the duties of our officers. However, I told him that to my

knowledge the question concerning whether the Government could pay for

private counsel selected by the employee has not been researched.

Mr. Callahan therefore requested that the research be conducted.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Administrative Division and Legal Counsel confer

and prepare an appropriate response to Mr. Callahan's request.

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Walsh

1 - Mr. Daly

1 - Mr. Donahue

1 - Mr. Mintz

-1108

gim

go 02112380

- 540

AUG 1 1975

cleared

JAM:mfd

(6)

N 62 3 43967 Pe 45: sarimes Band Regular on the Parral Sarings Plan

---

## Page 28

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA PPAIR (A1 CFR 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

: Mx.

J. B. Adams

DATE: 7/23/75

FROM : Legal Counselfi

SUBJECT AUTHORITY OF FRIAR VARA COUNSELE

JUSTICE TO RETAIN PRIVATE COUNSEL

. TO

REPRESENT

IT EMPLOYEES

FIMDRIG

slide.

While SIt AIG

set one eat on on te an is rate Aviaton.,

and Legal Counsel Division confer and prepare an appropriate

response to Mr. Callahan's request that research be con-

ducted to determine whether the FBI or the Department of

Justice would be authorized to pay for private counsel for

employees who are called to testify before the Senate

Select Committee and who desire private counsel.

We have

also undertaken to present the statutory considerations

governing the provision of such representation in a legal

proceeding as distinguished from a legislative hearing.

Title 5, United States Code, Section 3106, states:

"Except as otherwise authorized

by law, the head of an Executive

department or military department

may not employ an retorney

tion in which the United States,

an agency, or an employee theree AuG I 1915

is a party, or is interested, or

for the securing of evidence there:

for, but shall refer the matter to

Department of Justice. • •

.12

This statutory prohibition makes it clear that

only the Attorney General has the authority to make a

contract for special employment of an attorney.

This

Bureau, as an agency of the Department of Justice, ob-

viously does not have authority to do that which is

denied to Executive departments which are otherwise of

coequal stature to the Department of Justice.

1 - Mr. Callahan

1

- Mr. Jenkins

1 - Mr. Donahue

1 - Mr. Adams

2 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr. Walsh

PGD : mok

84 AG

2 5 4975

CONTINUED

WW 65360 Hold:32989627 Bage KS. Savings Bonds Regularly On the PaOVER minor pla

Assoc. Dir:

Dop. AB

ASSES

Admin

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com. -

Gon. Inv. -

Ident. _

Inspection

Intell. -

Ineratory i

Pion. out.

Spoc. Inv..

Training

Telephone Rm. _

Director Sac'y -

i "r

---

## Page 29

Memorandum to Mr. J. B. Adams

Authority of FBI and Department of Justice

to Retain Private Counsel to Represent Employees

An examination of our budgetary language by

representatives of the Administrative Division and this

Division does not disclose any explicit or implicit

authority which would qualify as

"otherwise authorized by

.". under the above statute.

The statutory

authority for provision of private counsel is contained in

Titlezo, United States Code, Section 515, which gives the

Attorney General the authority to appoint and pay special

attorneys. However, this authority is circumscribed by the

statement that these attorneys

• "may, when specifically

directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal

proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury pro

ceedings and proceedings before committing magistrates,

which United States Attorneys are authorized by law to

It is evident then that this authority

pertains only to proceedings held within the judicial

system, not to hearings held before a legislative body.

Such a hearing is not a "legal proceeding" and is not

"which United States Attorneys are authorized by

law to conduct. . . ."

In the event that employees need representation

in a legal proceeding and the Department believes that a

potential conflict of interest would prevent it from

providing counsel, outside counsel could be appointed

paid under the statute up to the monetary limits fixed.

Whether the Department would allow the individual employee

to designate or select the outside counsel would be a

matter of Departmental policy but we see no reason why

such an individual selection would not ordinarily be

approved.

We are aware that the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA) has recently engaged the law firm of Arnold

and Porter and that Mr. Mitchell Rogovin of that firm

has been designated as the individual attorney to represent

Inquiry with CIA has determined that the

authority relied on for this action is Title 50, United

States Code, Section 403j, which states:

- 2 -

(CONTINUED - OVER)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 29

---

## Page 30

Memorandum to Mr. J. B. Adams

Re: Authority of FBI and Department of Justice

to Retain Private Counsel to Represent Employees

"(a) Notwithstanding any other

other provisions of law, sums

made available to the Agency

by appropriation or otherwise

may be expended for purposes

necessary to carry out its

functions, including --

to limitations on types of

persons to be employed. . . ."

apparente would emphasize, however, that the counsel

hired represents the CIA, not individual employees, and

that private counsel has

the same problems as does their

"in-house" counsel.

Therefore, no firm or individual

hired by that agency can provide counsel to the individual

employee in any situation which presents a potential

conflict between the interests of the individual and the

interests of the agency.

CONCLUSION:

We conclude that there is no authority for either

the FBI or the Department to pay for private counsel

selected by employees called to testify before ti

Senate

Select committee or any other legislative body:

employee called to testify in such a forum desires private

counsel, or where a potential conflict of interest makes

representation by "in-house" counsel or the Department

impossible, the employee must decide if the possible

consequences warrant the personal expense of such counsel

and, if so, responsibility for payment rests with him.

Furthermore, private counsel retained by an

agency having authority to do so would be under the

same disabilities as

"in-house" or Departmental counsel

in situations presenting a potential conflict of interest.

- 3-

V

(CONTINUED - OVER)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 30

---

## Page 31

*.

Memorandum to Mr. J. B. Adams

Re: Authority of FBI and Department of Justice

to Retain Private Counsel to Represent Employees

The only authority for payment by the Department of

private counsel would be in a legal proceeding in the

judicial system under Title 28, United States Code,

Section 515.

RECOMMENDATION:

None. For information.

pun

god

- 4 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 31

---

## Page 32

TO

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

5010-106

"MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATUS GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

Mr. W. R.

FROM

: W.

1al.

Gregat

SUBJECT:

SENSTUDY 75.

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

DATE:

7/24/75

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1

- Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. D. Ryan

1 - Mr. S. F. Phillips

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Plan. & Eval. _

-Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Telephone Rm. -

SP-2 ALm/STG

This memorandum records Bureau waiver from sedrecy

agreement for interview of Atlanta Field Office (FO) SA Edward A.

Shea by Senate Select Committee (SSC) Staff Members at Atlanta,

7/22-23/75.

Supervisor S. F. Phillips of the Senstudy 75 Project

was in Atlanta 7/22/75 in connection with the interviews there

of six SAs (five from Atlanta FO; one who traveled to

Atlanta

from Knoxville FO) by SSC Staff Members Michael Epstein and

Mary DeOreo.

Interviews concerned the former FBI investigation

of Martin Luther King, Jr. At approximately 5:00 p.m.,

7/22/75, Epstein telephonically contacted Phillips and

advised

that one of the interviews developed information resulting in

his desire to interview a seventh SA, Edward A. Shea of the

Atlanta FO. In order to avoid another trip to Atlanta,

Epstein asked if Phillips could obtain FBI clearance for the

interview which would concern: (1) any possible COINTELPRO

operations in Atlanta with respect to King or the Southern

Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC); (2) Shea's assignment

to a "file review or file retrieval" project during past year

concerning COINTELPRO; and (3) concerning COINTELPRO "generally."

(It should be noted that earlier this year, Shea handled a

project relating to classifying documents in Atlanta files

regarding COINTELPRO. Sheaadvised Phillips of this and also

said that he does not recall seeing any documents regarding

COINTELPRO/SCIC - KING.) Epstein desired to interview Shea

the morning of 7/23/75.

62-116395

EX 104

REC 17 62-116375-538

1 - 67-

(Personnel File SA Edward A. Shea)

5 JUL 31 1975

SFP: 1hb 1hb

CONTINUED OVER

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 32

---

## Page 33

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re: Senstudy 75

62-116395

On basis of foregoing request, Phillips

telephonically contacted Assistant Director (AD) Mintz

who granted clearance for (1) and (2) above and suggested

withholding clearance on (3) pending further request from

Epstein after interview on items (1) and (2). Mintz asked

that Phillips

touch base with AD Wannall for his concurrence.

In the absence of Wannall who was out of the building,

Jeputy Al l' Leavitt concurred with Mintz. At about 5:30 p.m.;

7/22/75, Epstein was telephonically advised by Phillips as

indicated above--clearance for (1) and (2); not for (3) at

this time. Arrangements were then made for interview of

Shea morning of 7/23/75.

Subsequent interview of Shea (being reported

separately) apparently satisfied Epstein and it does not

appear there will be any further request as to item (3).

ACTION:

None. For information.

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 33

---

## Page 34

@ OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

5010-106

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSALGEN. REG. NO, 27

CUTED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

:

Mr. W. R.

WannallWit

FROM

: W.

Crests,

SUBJECT:

SENSTUDY 75

1 - Mr. N. P. Callahan

1 - Mr. T. J. Jenkins

1 - Mr.

J. B. Adams

DATE: 7/16/75

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

FADe Put

* TINTEG

Spo/ie/00 <SP2ALM/216

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst..

Ext. Affairs.

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Poset Th

Laborator hi

Legal Col

Plan. & Eyal.

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Telophone Rm. -

Pirector Soc'y —

This memorandum records that no effort

is being

made to respond to a request of the Senate Select Committee

(SSC) dated 6/27/75, pursuant to instructions of the

Deputy Attorney General, until such time as the Department

can obtain clarification from the SSC regarding the meaning

of paragraph 2 in the SSC's letter of 6/27/75.

Memorandum Wannall to Adams, dated 6/30/75, reviewed

a draft copy of the SSC's letter to the Department.

This

draft copy is dated 6/25/75. It is identical in content with

the final version dated 6/27/75.

Memorandum Cregar to Wannall, dated 7/2/75, reported

the results of a meeting in the office of the Deputy Attorney

General on the morning of 7/2/75. In this memorandum it was

pointed out that the Deputy Attorney General found considerable

difficulty in understanding paragraph 2 of the SSC's draft of

a letter dated 6/25/75. He noted that in view of the

ambiguities found in the letter, as well as the lack of any

specific agreement entered into with the SSC by the Department.

and/or the FBI, the Department should prepare a letter over

the Attorney General's signature asking for clarification.

In the meantime, the Deputy Attorney General advised that we

should take no action responsive to the requests levied on

the FBI in this letter.

To date, we have received no infor-

mation from the Department that a letter asking for clarification

of the SSC has been sent.

Enclosure

EX 104

REC10 62-116395-537

62-116395

WOC: 1hb linis

(6)

ENCLOSURE

5 JUL 31 1975

CONTINUED OVER

5C

і ГР

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 34

---

## Page 35

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re:

Senstudy 75

62-116395

The purpose of this memorandum is to note for the

record that no effort is being made to develop responses to

the SSC request of 6/27/75 until such time as the Department

obtains the clarification described above.

was noted during a conference that the Director and other

Bureau officials had with the Attorney General on the morning

of 7/15/75.

Enclosed herewith is a copy of the 6/27/75 request

mentioned above.

ACTION:

For information and record purposes.

per

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 35

---

## Page 36

FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMA

JOHN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIS

PHILIP A. HART, MICH.

HOWARD H. BAKETY-.t.. TENN.

MALTER F, MOMDALE, MINN.

BARRY GOLDViATER, ARIZ.

WALTERD, HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHAHLES MCG. MATHIAS, JR..MD.

MOSERT MORGAN, N.C.

RICHARD S. SCHWESKER, PA.

GARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAM S. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

• FREDERICK 4. 0. SCHWARZ, JR., CHIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINCRITE CCUNSEL

United Siates Seriale

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH ..

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO 5. REF. 21, SITH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTO:H.D.C. 20510

June 27, 1975

RECEIVO

JU: 91 1975

ETE

i..

#MDR16

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 36

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20530

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

Enclosed with this letter are notifications

concerning certain matters currently under investigation

by the Select Committee which relate to government entities

under your jurisdiction.

These notifications are submitted pursuant to

an agreement between the Committee, the various intelli-

gence entities, and the White House. Pursuant to that

agreement, the

various entities in the Executive Branch

have agreed not only to make available the pertinent

witnesses, but also to submit in response all information

and material which they possess that is relevant to the

areas and cases which the Committee wisbes to investigate.

The response should include all relevant underlying docu-

mentation and other information, incluang documents

which may not have come to the committee's attention and

which the Committee has not specifically requested, and

all material relating to any prior Executive Branch inquiry

into the matter. In addition, we would welcome a current

analysis of the particular questions raised by the Commit-

tee and any other observations on the sebject that you

believe-would be helpful.

DEFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS

FEDERAL BU."UM

We welcome the promise of cooperation matulistes

disclosure that underlies that agreement, Success in ful-

E

filling the full disclosure policy contained in the agree.

ment is indispensible to the Committee's anelys is ana-to

the formulation of our ultimate finding,

conclusions, and

recommendations.

.

DEFICE DE LEGISLATIVE AFFAB

FEDERAL BU. OF EX

•ENCLOSURE: 62-116395-537

---

## Page 37

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Page Two

June 27, 1975

Within the Committee mandate, contained in

S. Res. 21, there are four broad subjects relating to the

intelligence community which we are required to investi-

gate and study in order to determine the facts and ulti-

mately to decide whether to make recommendations for

They are:

I.. The structure, performance, and utility of

government operations with

respect to intel-

ligence activities.

2.

Whether certain policies or practices are

or are not illegal, unethical, or otherwise

improper.

3. Whether there has or has not been excessive

auplication or inadequate coordination be-

tween and among intelligence agencies and,

more generally, the efficiency of intelli-

gence activities.

4.

Whether there has or has not been adequate

internal and external control and oversight

over the policies and practices of intelli-

gence

agencies.

In attempting to find the answers to these funda-

mental questions, the Committee is proceeding in two ways.

First, we are examining intelligence functions broadly as

instruments of government policy, giving attention to the

authority for particular functions, the problems which

intelligence activities are designed to solve, the proce

dures by which intelligence activities are and have been

proposed, approved, executed, evaluated, and terminated,

the range and scope of the activities utilized to achieve

intelligence objectives, and the propriety and utility of

Second, we will examine in

depth certain subjects within the broad topics of inves-

tigation. (We would, of course, welcome your suggestion

cases that would give added insight into intelli-

gence matters under your jurisdiction.) These specific

subjects for investigation are not intended to limit the

scope contained in the more general questions.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 37

---

## Page 38

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Page Three

June 27, 1975

The annexed notifications spell these matters

out in greater detail. In addition, they ask certain

specific questions, set forth certain previously requested

documents not yet

received, request additional documents,

and, in some cases, ask for the names ana present addresses

of persons who have held certain positions. Where appro-

priate, the subject's description indicates that, pursuant

to the agreed outline for Inquiry Procedures, the matter

primarily concerns allegations of abuse or other contro-

versial specific matters where there is reason to believe

Improprieties may have occurred.

Finally,

the notifications

Indicate the name(s) of the staff member(s) who, in addition

to the Committee's senior staff, will be responsible for the

particular matters.

The Committee, in the course of the next few

months, will undertake other subjects for investigation

as its

work proceeds and will notify you as appropriate.

We look forward to your cooperation in these

matters.

Sincerely yours,

H.793.m0h

Frank Church

Chairman

Давн

Vice Chairman

evel

These specific requests are not, of course, intended

to limit the agreement to come forwara with all rele-

vant information and material, including documents, whether

or not they have been brought

to the Committee's attention

or have been specifically requested by the Comnittee.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 38

---

## Page 39

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

(Including DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)

Table of Contents

III.

I. Issues

II. Areas of General Inquiry

A. Legal Authority for FBI Intelligence and

Counterintelligence Activities

B. Organization and Operation of the FBI

Intelligence Division

•1. FBI Internal Security Intelligence

Operations

2. The FBI and the U. S. Intelligence

Community

3.

FBI Foreign Counterintelligence

Operations

4. Inspection Division Investigations

5. • FBI Intelligence Activities and State

or Local Law Enforcement Agencies

Case Studies

General Questions

A. Électronic Surveillance

1. Warrantless Electronic Surveillance

2. Warrantless Electronic Surveillance

and "Leaks"

• •

Page

1

•3.:

3

3

4 .

5°

5

6

7

9

9

11

. NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 39

---

## Page 40

IV.

3.

Electronic Surveillance of

Dr. Martin Luther King

4. Electronic Surveillance and the

Democratic National Convention,

Atlantic City, 1964

B. ' Surreptitious Entry

C. Mail Covers and Mail Openings

• D. Other Specific Techniques

• E. COINTELPRO and Disruptive Activities

F. Clandestine Informant Activities

G. "Notional" Organizations

H. Joint FBI-Police Operations

1. White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan,

Mississippi

2. Black Panther Party, Chicago

I. The "Huston Plan"

J. Alleged Political Misuse of the FBI

Department of Justice

A.

The Attorney General

B. The Internal Security Section (formerly

Division)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 40

Page

13

15

17

18

20

21

24

27

28

28

30 •

32

• 34

36

36

38

---

## Page 41

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

(INCLUDING DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE)

I.

Issues

The Committee's inquiry into the intelligence and

counterintelligence activities of the Federal Bureau

of Investigation is examining fundamental issues which

bear directly on the adequacy of current legislation

and adninistrative organization and procedure.

The

Comnittee seeks to determine whether FBI intelligence

and

counterintelligence activities achieve legitimate

objectives in conformity with the rule of law.

Among

the basic issues to be addressed are the following:

"A:

What is the legal authority for FBI intelligence .

and counterintelligence activities? Should the

FBI's authority be clarified or revised or

incorporated in a comprehensive statutory

charter?

B. What limitations are placed on FBI Intelligence

and counterintelligence activities by the

Constitution and laws of the United States?

Should these limitations be clarified or

revised?

C.

What have been the purposes and aims of FBI

Intelligence and counterintelligence activities?

Should these objéctives be modified?:

D.

How have the intelligence and counterintelligence

activities of the FBI been organized and coordinated

with other agencies of government?

Should these

procedures and practices be revised?

E. What have been the procedures for and techniques

of intelligence gathering and dissemination and

counterintelligence operations used by the FBI?

Under what conditions and through what procedures

should these methods and techniques be used in

the future?

F.

What have been and should be the mechanisms for

internal and external policy-making, control,

and supervision of FBI intelligence and counter-

Intelligence activitles?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 41

---

## Page 42

- 2-

-

As a means of examining the above issues in the

context of actual iBl Intelligence operations,

the committee intends to study certain specific

topics, some of which are general in nature, and

others of which involve specific cases, programs

or techniques. Part It, below, contains

descriptions

of the general areas into which the Committee: intends

to inquire.

Part III contains descriptions of the

specific cases mentioned above. The descriptions

specifically indicate whether the investigation may

concentrate on specific allegations of possible

abuses or other controversial matters where there

Is reason to believe improprieties may have occurred.

• In addition to the topics described below, additional

areas of inquiry may develop during the course of the

Committee's

work.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 42

---

## Page 43

- 3 -

II. Areas of General Inquiry

A.

Legal Authority. for FBI Intelligence and Counter-

intelligence Activities

The Committee is examining the legal basis for FBI

intelligence and counterintelligence activities.

There may be serious question as to the adequacy

of the present legislative framework for the FBI's

functions in these fields. Current statutes

authorize the FBI to perform investigative and law

enforcement functions, but they do not specifically

authorize intelligence or counterintelligence

•activities. Therefore; the Committee seeks to

determine

whether the

FBI's authority should be

clarified, revised, or incorporated in a compre-

hensive statutory charter.

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

B. Organization and Operation of the FBI Intelli-

gence Division

The Committee is investigating the structure and

operating practices of the FBI Intelligence Divi-

sion.

Proposals have been made that the national

security intelligence and counterintelligence

functions of the FBI should be lodged in a

separate

agency or otherwise separated from the FBI's

criminal investigative activities.

Further recom-

mendations have been advanced for improved coordina-

tion between the fBl and other intelligence agencies,

for strengthened

supervision or FBl intelligence and

counterintelligence activitles by the Attorney

General or an independent board, and for clearer

standards and procedures for FBI activities in

this

thererore, the committee desires complete

information on the operating practices and proce-

dures of the FBI Intelligence Division and of the

field

office activities

supervised by the Intelli-

gence

Division.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 43

---

## Page 44

- 4 -

"..

The Committee's inquiry focuses on the following

specific areas:

1. FBI Internal Security Intelligence Operations

The Committee seeks to determine the nature

and purpose of FBI intelligence operations

directed at foreign intelligence activities

and

subversive or extremist activities within

the United States.

'It has been alleged that

the scope of FBI intelligence investigations

is too broad and has extended to legitimate

political activities. Consequently, the Com-

mittee must examine how the FBI's responsibili-

ties have been defined.

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

2.

The FBI and the U. S. Intelligence Community

The Committee seeks to determine what have

been the policies and procedures for coordina-

tion between the FBI and other agencies in the

-: S. intelligence community.

There have been

occasions in the

past where friction between

the FBI and other agencies has produced

serious

dissatisfaction within the U.S. intelligence

community.

The purpose of this inquiry is to

evaluate the adequacy of past and present co-

. ordinating mechanisms.

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 44

---

## Page 45

-5-

3.

...

48

:

FBI Foreign Counterintelligence Operations

The Committée seeks to determine the nature of

FBI counterintelligence operations directed at

foreign intelligence activities within the

United States or at any other hostile foreign-

related activities within the United States.

Since FBI operations to "counter" these activi-

ties go beyond intelligence collection, the

Committee must consider whether such practices

require statutory authorization.

The impact

of counterintelligence operations on United

States foreign relations will also be considered..

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Loch Johnson

Barbara Banoff

Inspection Division Investigations

The Committee is examining the relationship

of the FBI Inspection Division to FBI intelli-

gence and counterintelligence activities.

includes both regular Inspection. Division

reviews of Intelligence Division and field

office functions and specific investigations

of allegations of improper conduct in connec-

tion. with FBI intelligence activities.

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 45

t.......1

---

## Page 46

6 -

5.

FBI Intelligence Activities and State or Local

Law Enforcement Agencies

The Committee seeks to determine the nature of

the relationships between FBI intelligence

activities and state and local law enforcement

agencies.

This subject involves the delicate

balance between the necessary contralization

of certain law enforcement activities and the

Constitutionally-mandated decentralization of

general law enforcement responsibility.

It is

necessary for the Committee to evaluate the

centralizing influence of the FBl, as

well as

the FBI's role as a check on local law enforce-

ment abuses.

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

Walter Ricks

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 46

---

## Page 47

IIT.

Case Studies

General Questions

The descriptions which follow of the specific cases the

Committee intends to study are, intended to serve the

dual purpose of notifying the l'BI of the issues the

Committee will explore in connection with each case

and eliciting from the FBI all information and material

in its possession relating to the questions the committee

wishes to explore in each case. In order to avoid

unnecessary repetition of certain questions which will

be basic to the Committee's investigations of each

• case, certain fundamental questions are set forth

below. As to each case described, the Committee

intends to explore these fundamental questions, and

expects that the FBI will,

all information and material it has relating to these

basic questions even though they are not repeated in

the discussion of each particular area.

I. What is or has been the legal authority for the

activity?

.2. What have been the purposes of the activity?

3. What techniques have been employed in the activity?

4. What kinds of information have been gathered in

the activity?

5.

How have specific uses of the activity been initiated

and approved?

6. How have the targets for the activity been selected?

7. What have been the criteria for target selection?

8.

How has the intelligence which is collected been

used?

9.

To whom has the intelligence collected been dis-

seminated?

10. What has been the basis for any dissemination with

respect to. each recipient?

11. How has the activity been coordinated with other

intefligence agencies?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 47

---

## Page 48

- 8

-

12.

What have been the effects of this coordination?

13.

To what extent has each of the foregoing been com-

patible with the legal authority.for and

the purposes

of the activity?

14. By what means has the activity been monitored,

controlled and administered?

15. What are the potential abuses to which the activity

• may lead?

16. To what abuses has the activity led?

17°

What steps have been taken to investigate such

abuses?

c18. What steps have been taken to avoid such abuses?

19. What have been the costs and utility of the

activity?

In some instances, the specific questions set forth

below may appear to repeat

some of the general questions.

The purpose in such cases is simply to clarify the appli-

cation of. the general question to the specific case.

Except where inapplicable by their terms, all general

questions relate to each specific case.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 48

---

## Page 49

- 9-

A.

Electronic Surveillance

The Committee is examining all forms of electronic

interception of communications including wiretap-

ping, electronic eavesdropping, consensual elec-

tronic surveillance interception of video and data

communications, local monitoring devices, and all

other forms of

' electronic or technical monitoring.

The Committee's general questions apply to each of

• the techniques listed above,

as well as to the

matters

set forth in the following specific cases.

1.

Warrantless Electronic Surveillance

The Committee seeks to determine whether the

Attorney General should have the authority

to authorize electronic

tain purposes without a surveillance for cer-.

prior judicial warrant.

This power has been exercised by succeeding

Attorneys General since 1940, upon the explicit

directive of the President.

The Supreme Court

has ruled that this power does not extend to

but the remaining scope

definedby the supreme Court.....

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the

Justice Department address the following specific

• questions:

What is the scope and basis of the claim

of Executive authority to conduct warrant-

less electronic surveillance?

b.

What have been the procedures for considera-

tion and approval of requests

for warrantless

electronic surveillance authorized by the

Attorney General?

c.

What are the specific disadvantages of the

judicial warrant requirement for those

electronic surveillances which have been

authorized by the Attorney General?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 49

---

## Page 50

- 10 -

d.

Does the Fourth Amendment permit the

issuance of judicial warrants for elec-

tronic surveillance on grounds other than

ordinary probable cause

where national

security intelligence purposes are advanced

to justify the surveillance?

e.

To what extent are the specific procedures

of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control

Act of 1968 inappropriate for electronic

surveillance conducted for national secu-

rity intelligence purposes?

Documents

The Committee

requests the following additional

documents bearing on the questions stated above:

a. All written justifications for the specific

authorizations by the Attorney General for

warrantless electronic surveillance from

January 1, 1960, until the present.

b.

All documents reflecting the denial by the

Attorney General of specific requests for

warrantless electronic surveillance from

January 1, 1960, until the present.

C.

Committee staff access to information con-

tained in the impounded documents, deposi-

tions, and other materials in all

pending

civil suits which involve warrantless

electronic surveillance and in which the

Committee has received the consent of the

plaintiffs for such access.

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force Leader

Mike Epstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 50

---

## Page 51

- 11 -

2.

•..

Warrantless Electronic Surveillance and

"Leaks"

•The Committee is examining several instances of

the use of warrantless electronic surveillance

and other investigative techniques in connection

with "leaks" of classified information. These

cases may involve specific allegations of abuse

or other controversial matters where there is

reason to believe improprieties may have

occurred. These instances include:

The investigation of alleged "leaks" by or

to 17 Executive officials and newsmen

• between May 1969 and February 1971.

b. The investigation of alleged "leaks" from

a military staff member assigned to the

National Security Council in 1971-72.

c.

The reported investigation of columnist

Joseph Kraft in 1969.

d. The reported investigation of the activities

of Mrs. Anna Chennault and Vice Presidential

candidate Spiro Agnew in 1968.

e. Any other instances of warrantless electronic

surveillance in connection with the investi-

gation of "leaks" to the press.

• Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the

Justice Department address the following specific

questions:

a:

Through what procedures and by whom were

each of these electronic súrveillances auth-

orized and approved, continued, and terminated?

b.

As to each person to whom information was

disseminated, please state:

(1) The nature of the information.

(2) The basis for the dissemination.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 51

---

## Page 52

12:-

(3) The date of each dissemination.

(4)

The use which was in fact made of the

information by the recipient.

C .

What evaluations were made of the original

grounds for the surveillance as it progressed?

d.

What were the results of the evaluations?

e.

Who made them?

f. What are the reasons for use of electronic

surveillance without judicial warrant to

Investigate "leaks" of classified information

to the press?

How does each of the above instances relate

to these reasons?

h. To what extent would requirement of a

warrant interfere with the ability to

detect such

• leaks?

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 52_

---

## Page 53

- 13 -

Surveillance of Dr. Martin Luther King

This investigation examines the authorization for,

conduct and termination of, and deliberations

regarding the surveillance of Dr. King. This case

may involve specific allegations of abuses and other

controversial matters where there is reason to be-

lieve improprieties may have occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the

• Justice Department address the following specific

questions:

a..

Through what procedures and by whom were

wiretaps and electronic bugs of Dr. King

initiated, approved, continued, and termina-

ted?

b.

What were the locations, extent, and

duration of the electonic surveillances

of Dr. King?

. C.

What were the grounds of national security,

if any, for the

introduction of the electronic

surveillances of Dr. King?

d. What was the relationship between the information

collected

and

each of the purposes of the

surveillance?

e. What evaluations were made of the original

grounds for the

surveillance as it progressed?

I. What were the results of those evaluations?

g.

Who made them?

What periodic evaluations were made of the

relationship between the information being

collected and the original objectives of the

surveillance?

i.

What were the results of the evaluations?

j.

Who made them?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 53

---

## Page 54

14

-

k.

To whom were any results of the

surveillance disseminated?

1.

As to each person to whom information was

disseminated, please state

(1) The nature of the information.

(2) The basis for the dissemination.

(3) The date of each dissemination.

(4)

The use which was in fact made of

the information.

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force Leader

Mike Epstein

...

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 54

---

## Page 55

- 15 -

Surveillance at the Democratic National-

Convention, Atlantic City, 1964

The Committee is examining the use of

surveillance and other intelligence operations

in Atlantic City, New Jersey, on or about the

time of the Democratic National Convention in

1964.

This case may involve specific allegations

of abuses and other controversial matters where

there is reason to believe improprieties may

have occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice

Department address the following specific questions:

a. Did the FBI conduct electronic surveillance

and other intelligence operations at this

time and place?

b. Who were the targets?

C.

Through what procedures and by whom were the

decisions made to engage in electronic

surveillance and intelligence operations

at this time and place?

d.

What were the nature, extent, and duration

of the electronic surveillance and other

intelligence operations at this time and

place?

e.

What was the relationship between each target

selected and the purpose of the surveillance?

f.

Was the FBI requested to conduct such

surveillance by any person, or organization

outside the FBI?

g. If so, by whom, when, and for what stated

reason?

h. To whom were the results of the surveillance

disseminated?

1. As to each person whom information was

disseminated,

please state

NW-65360-Đocld:32989627-Page-55

---

## Page 56

- 16 -

(1) The nature of the infornation.

(2) The basis for the dissemination.

(3) The date of each dissemination. .

• (4=)

The use which was in fact made of

the information.

Responsible staff:

Senior Staff

Task Force Leader

Mike Epstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 56

---

## Page 57

17 -

K Act 5 (9) (2)(01

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice

Department address the following specific questions:

I. What are the scope and basis of the claim of

Executive authority to conduct warrantless

surreptitious entry as asserted by the

Department of Justice in United States v.

Ehrlichman?

Act 5 (9)12)1D)

3. As to any instance in which the FBI has refused

to comply with another agency's request for

surreptitious entry, what was

a. The basis for the refusal?

b. The reason given for the reguest?

4. What procedures were employed to authorize any

surreptitious entry identified under 2, and who

authorized each such entry?

5.

To the extent applicable by their terms, each of

the above questions and the General Questions

will be explored specifically with reference to

any entry or proposed entry at an embassy in

May 1972.

Responsible Staff: Senior Staff

Task Force Leader

Mike. Epstein

Paul Wallach

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 57

---

## Page 58

18 -

C:. Mail Covers and Mail Openings

The Committee is examining the conduct of mail covers

and mail openings by or on behalf of the FBI and any

instances of mail openings of intercepts which may

have been conducted by or on behalf of the FBI. This

Inquiry may involve allegations of abuse or other

controversial matters where there is reason to

believe improprieties may have occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice.

Department address the following specific questions:

1o

The specific purposes of all mail covers conducted

in connection with FBI intelligence and counter-

intelligence activities. This includes all

documents pertaining to FBI decisions to request

Postal Service mail covers and lists of all

subjects upon whom mail covers have been placed

as a result of FBI requests since January 1, 1960.

2.

The procedures and practices for the dissemination

of information from mail covers requested by the

FBI. This includes a list of all entities to whom

mail cover information has been disseminated since

January 1, 1960.

3o Whether or not FBI personnel may have conducted

mail covers in violation of existing Postal Service

'regulations.

For any mail covers which may have

been .conducted by FBI personnel or for the FBI by

persons other than Postal Service employees, from

physical, 1960, to the present: Identify the

location where the mail cover was

conducted, the names of all persons who participated

• In and authorized the mail cover, and a brief.

explanation of the purpose of the mail cover and

why It was initiated.

Whether or not the FBI has opened mail or caused •

mail to be opened, either with or without the

permission of the

Postal Service. For all

Incidents of mail opening which may have been

conducted by FBI employees or by other persons

In cooperation with the FBI, from January 1,

1960, until the present: identify the physical

location where the mail was opened or intercepted,

the names of the individuals who participated in

the opening, or intercept, and the purpose of the

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page9gening or intercept.

---

## Page 59

- 19 -

Documents

The Committee requests the following additional

documents bearing on the questions stated above:

1.

All documents which discuss, refer to, or

• relate to che origins, authorizations.

sonauct, and termination of and procedures

for the

identified in 3 and

mail covers'y above.

intercepts, and openings

Responsible Staff: Senior Staff

Task Force Leader

Paul Wallach

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 59

---

## Page 60

- 20 -

=. D.

%.

..

Other Specific Techniques

it-As to the following techniques, the Committee's

Inquiry will initially be confined to the General

-Questions.

As the inquiry proceeds, areas of

potential abuse and thus of specific inquiry beyond

the General Questions may develop:

I. Incommunicado detention and interrogation.

..

• 2. Photographic and television surveillance.

3. Polygraphs.

4.

the obtaining of bank, credit, school, and

other personal records and information.

including the obtaining of information under

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 60

---

## Page 61

- 21 ÷

E.

COINTELPRO and Disruptive Activities

The Committee is investigating the circumstances

surrounding the origins of, authorization for, and

implementation of the FBI program known as COINTEL-

PRO and any similar programs. This inquiry may

Involve allegations of abuse and controversial matters

where there is rcason to believe impioprieties may

have occurred. The scope of this investigation

covers:

I. COINTELPRO - Communist Party USA;

2. COINTELPRO -- Socialist Workers Party;

3. COINTELPRO - White Hate Groups;

4. COINTELPRO

-- Black Extremists;

5. COINTELPRO - New Left;

6. COINTELPRO -- Special Operations

(except as

targeted against hostile foreign intelligence

services);

7. " COINTELPRO - Puerto Rican Independence Groups;

8. COINTELPRO - Operation Hoodwink

9. Any other activities of the FBI which have or

have had the purpose and effect of disrupting

domestic groups or discrediting U.S. citizens,

whether or not carried out under a COINTELPRO

program.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI

and the Justice

Department address the following specific questions:

I. Under what circumstances, through what proce

dures, and by whom were these programs initiated,

authorized, and terminated?

2.

Under what circumstances and through what pro-

cedures did the FBI discover and report to the

Attorney

• General the existence of items 7 and 8

identified above and similar disruptive activities

not included in the original review of COINTELPRO

astivities

conducted by the Department of Justice.

In 1974?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 61

---

## Page 62

- 22 -

3.

What were the purposes of each program?

. 4.

In each case, by what means was it intended the

purpose would be accomplished?

5. What internal FBI procedures were adopted for

the consideration and approval of specific dis-

•ruptive activities and for determining the

results of such activities?

б.

As to each operation listed above, and any

others of a fundamentally similar

kind, identify

by type the sources of the information used

against individuals and groups for disruptive

purposes.

7. As to each instance in which such information

was obtained through electronic surveillance

(a) .What or who was the target of the sur-

veillance?

(b) Was the surveillance legal?

(c) Was the surveillance conducted pursuant to

warrant?

(d) What were the dates of the surveillance?

(e) What were the precise means of surveillance?

8.

• (f)

Who authorized the surveillance (both

within and without the FBI)?

(g) What was the purpose of the surveillance?

As to each case listed above and all fundamen-

tally similar cases, what was the legality and

propriety of the distruptive activities?

Should

any of the activities referred to in the above

sentence be forbidden by statute

, considered

for luture use, or otherwise subject to statu-

tory or administrative regulation?

NW 65360 Docid:32989627 Page 62

---

## Page 63

=23=

9..

In what activities has, the FBI engaged since

April 28, 1971, the purpose or effect of which

has been

to disrupt domestic groups or discredit

U.S. citizens or which bear any other similarity

to the purposes or effects of COINTELPRO

activities?

10.

What restrictions, directives, or other measures

have been adopted by the FBI and the Justice

Department to limit or regulate the use

of

such disruptive techniques?

•The Committee will investigate all COINTELPRO and

• disruptive activities identified above.

On the basis

of a review of the summaries of COINTELPRO cases prepared

further requests for information and documents.

Responsible Staff: Senior Staff

Task Force Leader

Les Seidel

Mike Epstein

Walter Ricks

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 63

---

## Page 64

- 24 -

...

Clandestine Informant Activities

The Comnittee is examining all aspects of the

FBI's use of informants, sources, and undercover

personnel and the techniques employed by such per-

sons. .

Although informants are the single most

productive source of intelligence information, ine

difficulties of controlling their activities may

increase the possibility of improper conduct. The

use of informants to infiltrate organizations also

' may pose dangers to the right of associational pri-

vacy.

Consequently, proposals have been made for

•the imposition of a judicial warrant requirement

or other

safeguards for the use of informants.

The Committee seeks to evaluate such proposals as

well as the contributions of informants to the

accomplishment of legitimate objectives.

In addition, the Committee is examining informant

activities with respect to several particular situa-

tions and cases.

This investigation may involve

specific allegations of abuse or controversial

matters where there is reason to believe improprie-

ties may have occurred. The Committee's inquiry

covers the general circumstances surrounding the

following incidents or cases:

a. Wounded Knee;

b. Kent State;

c. " New York v. Stroble (Attica);

d. United States v. Buckalew (Gainesville);

e. United States v. Briggs (Camden) ;

f. New York v. Dillon (Hobart College);

go United States v. Marshall (Seattle).

Additional cases may also be examined.

In addition to the above cases, the Committee is

examining the role of FBI informants in providing

roomine sent son

information to the FBI concerning members of the

MW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 64

---

## Page 65

- 25 -

a.

Ku Klux Klan;

b. Students for a Democratic Society;

c. Weathermen;

d. Black Panther Party;

e. Communist Party USA;.

'1. W.E.B. DuBois Clubs.

Additional studies of informant activities with

respect to members of other organizations may be

formulated.

Questions

The committee requests that the FBl and the Justice

• Department address the following specific questions:

1. With respect to both categories of cases listed

above,

what allegations, whether unfounded or

not, of improper, illegal, unethical, or provoca-

tive conduct by

FBI informants have been made in

connection with

these situations or groups?

2.

What measures has the FBI taken to investigate

such allegations of misconduct and to prevent

such alleged misconduct from taking place in the

future?

3. What instructions has the FBI given to its in-

tormants with respect to possible improper,

Lilegal, unethical, or provocative conduct?

4. What has been the largest number of informants,

• • sources, and undercover personnel in use at any

one time during each year from 1960 until

the

present in connection with security, intelli-

gence, and counterintelligence matters, cases,

and programs?

5. What has been the annual total amount of funds

(including

reimbursement for expenses) paid to

informants

and sources for each year from 1960

until the present?

_ NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 65

---

## Page 66

- 26 -

6.

What limits, if any, have been placed on the

type of information

which informants have been

intrusted to report back to the FBI?

7.

What have been the annual percentage of

potential informants who became paid infor-

mants in connection with security, intelli-

gence, and counterintelligence matters, cases,

and programs from 1960 until the present?

Documents

Please provide a summary of ten cases (for each

of the following categories) where the FBI's use

of informants,

sources, or undercover personnel

resulted in:

I. the conviction of an espionage agent of a

foreign government.

2. the prevention of the theft of national secu-

rity information.

3. the prevention of sabotage.

4.

the

prevention of an act of violence.

5. the prevention of the carrying out of a con-

spiracy to overthrow the government.

6.. any other successful preventive actions in

furtherance of the FBI's national security

responsibilities.

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mike Epstein

Jack Smith

Walter Ricks

Pat Shea

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 66

---

## Page 67

- 27 -

**.

"Notional" Organizations

The Committee is examining the FBI's alleged

creation of the support for "notional" organizations

for intelligence or counterintelligence purposes.

Although it may rely upon informants and other

clandestine operatives, this alleged practice is

sufficiently novel to require separate attention.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice

• Department address the following specific questions:

₴

1. What groups, organizations, movements, or other

associations has the fBl caused directly or

indirectly to be formed or created for intel-

ligence or counterintelligence purposes?

Please

provide a complete list from January 1, 1960,

to the present.

2. What groups, organizations, movements, or

other associations has the

FBI supported finan-

cially or materially? Please provide a complete

list from January 1, 1960, to the present.

3. In which cases has the FBI supported or created

such organizations in coordination or coopera-

tion with other agencies?

4. How have the presence of such "notional" organi-

• zations affected the public's perception of the

movements of which they form a part?

5. How have any FBI programs for the creation and

support of such groups been coordinated with

any similar programs undertaken by the CIA or

other U.S. intelligence agencies?

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mike Epstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 67

---

## Page 68

- 28 -

H.

Joint FBI-Police Operations

The purpose of this inquiry is to examine certain

allegations

that joint FBI-police operations re-

sulted in misconduct or abuse.

These cases are

complex and involve a variety of techniques.

Nevertheless, they may indicate some of the

most

serious problems which may arise in attempting to

with potentially violent situations.

The White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan,

Mississippi

The Committee is inquiring into the relation-

ships between the FBI and other law enforcement

agencies and

private organizations in Mississippi

in connection with the white Knights of the

Ku Klux Klan.

The purpose of the inquiry is to

determine what effect, if any, FBI activities

had on the actions of

other law enforcement

agencies and private individuals with respect

to the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in

Mississippi. This investigation may involve

allegations of abuses or other controversial

matters where there is reason to believe impro-

prieties may have occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the

Justice Department address the following

specific questions:

a. Was this organization a target of FBI

COINTELPRO operations?

b.

If so, how and by whom was it selected as

a target?

.

What were the purposes of any disruptive

operations directed at it?

d. To what extent were the purposes achieved?

e.

What disruptive techniques, if

any, were

employed?

=

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 68

---

## Page 69

-- 29 ÷

f.

Over what period of time did the disrup-

tive activities occur?

What evaluations were made of their effects?

h. By whom were they made?

1. What were the results of the evaluations?

j.. Were FBI informants used to infiltrate the

organization?

k.

If so, what kinds of information did the

Informants gather?

1.. What activities did the informants engage

in other than information gathering?

m.

Identify by date and names the persons

involved in all contacts the FBI had with

other law enforcement agencies and private

groups and individuals with respect to

alleged Klan bombings of. Jewish synagogues

and the homes of Jewish leaders in Meridian,

Mississippi, during May - August 1968.

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Jack Smith

Les Seidel

=

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 69

---

## Page 70

- 30 -

2.

The Black Panther Party, Chicago

The Committee is inquiring into the relation-

ships between the FBI and other law enforce-

ment agencies in the Chicago area in connec-

tion with the Chicago chapter of the Black

Panther Party. The purpose of the inquiry is

to determine what effect, if any, FBI activities

had on the actions of other law enforcement and

intelligence agencies with respect to the Black

Panther Party in the Chicago area.

This inves-

tigation may involve allegations of abuses or

Other controversial matters where there is rea-

son to believe improprieties may have occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the

Justice Department address the following

specific questions:

a. Was the Chicago chapter of the Black

Panther Party a target of FBI COINTELPRO

operations?

be II so, how and by whom was it selected as

a target?

What were the purposes of any disruptive

operations directed at it?

= a.

To what extent were the purposes achieved?

e. What disruptive techniques,

if any, were employed?

1.

g.

Over what period of time did the disruptive

activities occur?

What evaluations were made of their effects?

h. By whom were they made?

1. If FBI informants were used to infiltrate

the organization, what kinds or information

did the informants gather?

.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 70

---

## Page 71

- 31--

j.

What techniques did the informants employ

to gather the information?

k.

•1.

Were the techniques used by the informants

all approved and monitored by the FBI? If

not, which were not so approved?

What activities did the informants engage

in other than information gathering?

mo

What other methods and sources did the FBI

use to gather intelligence on the organiza-

tion?

n.

If electronic surveillance was used, how

•did the use of such surveillance relate to

each of the general questions?

0.

To what extent was information on persons

and groups not members of or?

affiliated

with the Black Panther Party gathered,

stored, or disseminated by the FBI as a

result

of its investigations of the organi-

zation?

Responsible staff: Senior staff

Task Force leader

Walter Ricks

Chris Pyle

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 71

---

## Page 72

- 32 -

I.: The "Huston Plan"

The Committee is examining the FBI's role in the

disposition of the report of the Interagency Com-

mittee on Intelligence (Ad

• Hoc) in 1970. This

report as submitted to the President included cer-

tain options which were specifically identified as

"illegal". It purported to represent the joint

recommendations of all members of the U. S. intel-

ligence community, but FBI Director J. Edgar

Hoover disagreed in a series of footnotes.

The serious consideration given to such al-

legedly illegal proposals gives this case

•the utmost significance for the Committee's under-.

standing of the risks of uncontrolled intelligence

activity. This case may involve specific allega-

tions of abuse and controversial matters where

there is reason to believe improprieties may have

occurred.

Questions

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice

Department address the following specific questions:

I. What contacts occurred between Tom Charles

Huston and personnel of the FBI and the Depart-

ment of Justice during 1969 and 1970? Identify

by date and names of persons involved.

2. What was the purpose of each such contact?

3. • With respect to any assistance providea to the

Interdepartmental Committee on Intelligence

(Ad Hoc) by personnel of the FBI:

a. Who were the FBI participants?

b. What kind of assistance was provided?

What was the role of the FBI in preparing

the various drafts of the special report

of the Committee?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 • Page 72

---

## Page 73

- 33 -

What were the specific arguments advanced

for the inclusion of the allegedly illegal

options in the special report submitted for

the President's consideration? Were other

allegedly illegal options considered and

rejected?

5. Were any measures taken by the FBI to imple-

ment specific elements of the Huston Plan?

This includes both the allegedly "illegal"

aspects and other provisions such as the

expanded

recruitment of 18-21 year old infor-

mants.

What are the present views of the FBI and

the. Department of Justice as to the legality

and propriety of the various options included

in the special report?

--

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Barbara Banoff

Loch Johnson

....

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 73

---

## Page 74

- 34 -

....

Ji. Alleged Political Misuse of the FBI

The Committee is investigating allegations that

the intelligence and investigative resources of

the FBI have been misused by various Presidents,

Attorneys General, Members of Congress, and FBI

executives themselves.

This subject may involve

specific allegations of abuse and other contro

versial matters where there is reason to believe

Improprieties may have occurred.

Questions

-

The Committee requests that the FBI and the Justice

Department address the following specific questions:

I..

Have persons outside the FBI sought the FBI's

assistance for partisan political purposes or

personal advantage? Please identify each

instance by the name of the person seeking to

so use the FBI, the date, and the nature of the

assistance

sought.

2.

In each such case, what has been the response

of the FBI?

3.

Have persons inside or outside the FBI sought

to employ the resources of the FBI for purposes

outside the FBI's authority?

Please identify

each instance by the name of the person seeking

to so use the FBI, the date, and

the purpose

"for which the

person sought to use the FBI.

4.

In each such case, what has been the response

of the FBI?

5. What measures has the FBI employed to

a. Respond to critics.

b. Affect the reputation or credibility of or

otherwise discredit critics.

6. What were the nature, purpose, duration, and

results of Project INLET Involving preparation

of an intelligence letter for the President

and other Executive officials?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 74

---

## Page 75

- 35 -

With respect to any so-called "secret files"

maintained within the fB,

including the

"official and confidential" and"personal

and

confidential! files maintained by the executive

assistant to the FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover

on his behalf until the time of his death, the

Committee secks to establish the contents

of

such files, the circumstances surrounding the

transfer of a portion of such files within the

Bureau at the time of Director Hoover's death,

the transfer of a portion of such files to

Mr. Hoover's residence, the destruction of any

Mr. Hoover, the transfer of any such files from

s residence, the use of information

within such files, and

their relationship to

the official investigative files of the FBI.

The Committee desires all information bearing

on these matters, including the results of

8

any inquiries conducted within the FBI and

the Department of Justice.

8.

What measures have been taken to ensure that the

intelligence and investigative resources of the

FBI are not misused for political purposes or

personal

advantage.

9. What additional measures should be taken?

Responsible Staff: Senior Staff

Task Force Leader

Mark Gitenstein

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 75

---

## Page 76

Siren

- 36 -

IV.

Department of Justice

The Committee is examining activities of divisions of

the

Justice Department other than the FBI which perform

internal security and intelligence functions.

The pur-

pose of these inquiries is to determine whether these

functions have been carried out in conformity with the

rule of law.

A.

The Attorney General

The Committee is studying the functions of the

Attorney General with respect to the supervision

"of and policy-making for internal security and

intelligence activities.

The Committee seeks to

determine whether his duties are properly defined

and his office properly organized to perform

these functions effectively.

Questions

• The Committee requests that the Justice Department

address the following specific questions:

1. To what extent has the Attorney General been

involved in the consideration or approval of

-the policies and activities of U. S. foreign

and military intelligence agencies?

2. Has the Justice Department made any agree-

ments with the CIA or any other U. S. intelli-

gence agency with regard to the investigation

• or prosecution of agency personnel?

3.

Under what circumstances and for what purposes

has the Office of Legal Counsel provided legal

advice to the Attorney General on matters per-

taining to foreign and domestic intelligence

activities?

4.

To what extent has the Attorney General

authorized cooperation, including the exchange

of information and the conduct of joint opera-

tions, between the Drug Enforcement Administra-

tion or its predecessors and the CIA or other

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 76

---

## Page 77

- 37 -

intelligence agencies with respect to narcotics

intelligence?

What standards and procedures has the Attorney

General adopted for:..

a:

The collection, analysis, use, and dis-

semination of narcotics intelligence.

b. The collection, analysis, use, and dis-

semination of organized crime

intelligence.

Co.

The use of intelligence information by the

Immigration and Naturalization Service.

d.

Law Enforcement Assistance Administration

grants for the support of state or local

police intelligence activities and intel-

ligence data systems.

6.

To what extent have communications between the

White House and the FBI or other agencies.

under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General

bypassed the Attorney General? To what extent

should such communications be channeled through

the Attorney General?

•7.

What have been the policies and procedures of

the Justice Department for evaluating the

budget requests of the FBI for intelligence

and counterintelligence activities?

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Mark Gitenstein

Barbara Banoff

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 77

---

## Page 78

- 38 -

B.

The Internal Security Section (formerly Division)

The Committee is examining the activities of the

Internal Security Section of the Justice Depart-

ment and its predecessor, the Internal Security

Division.

These entities have supervised the

Department's internal security law enforcement

activities, coordinated certain interdepartmental

internal security policies, and engaged in the

collection, analysis, and dissemination of intelli-

gence.

Questions

•The Committee requests that the Justice Department •

address. the following specific questions:

I. Under what circumstances, if any, has the

Justice Department seriously considered prose-

cutions under the Smith Act and laws pertain- :

ing to seditious conspiracy, rebellion,

insurrection, or "subversive activities",

since January 1, 1960?

2. To what extent has FBI intelligence activity

provided valuable evidence for use in the

prosecution of specific federal crimes?

3. What have been the practices and procedures.

for coordination of policy through the Inter-

departmental Committee on Internal Security?

What have been the practices and procedures

4o • for the interdepartmental and interagency

evaluation of domestic intelligence and

domestic collection of foreign intelligence

through the Intelligence Evaluation Committee

and its predecessors?

5. With respect to the Interdivisional Intelli-

gence

• Unit and the Analysis and Evaluation

Section of the Internal Security Division,

a. What have been the practices and proce-

dures of the Unit and Section for the

gathering of intelligence?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 78

---

## Page 79

- 39 -

6.

b.

e.

What type of information has been stored

in readily retrievable form by the Unit

and Section?

To whom and for what reasons has intelli-

gence information been disseminated by

the Unit and Section?

•d.

e.

What were

the reasons for the submission

of IDIU computer printouts to the CIA, as

reportedly occurred in 1969?

To what extent did the Unit and Section

make specific requests to other agencies

within and outside the Justice Department

•for intelligence information?

With respect to the use of grand juries by

the Special Litigation Section of the Internal

security Division,

a.'

Have any allegations of misuse of the grand

jury process in cases handled by Special

Litigation Section attorneys come to the

attention of the Department? If so,

briefly describe each such allegation and

what, if any, action was taken by the

Department in response to such allegation.

b.

To what extent, if any, did the use of

grand juries in cases handled by the Special

Litigation Section attorneys differ from the

use of grand juries in cases handled by

other sections of the Justice Department?

C.

to what extent, if any, was information

obtained through the use of grand juries

included in the intelligence files of the

Interdivisional Intelligence, Unit or the

Analysis and Evaluation Section?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 79

---

## Page 80

- 40 -

7. What have been the practices and procedures

of the Internal Security Division and the

Departmental Security Office for advising the

Attorney General and other executive agencies

with regard to the Federal Employee Security

Program?

Responsible staff:

Senior staff

Task Force leader

Barbara Banoff

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 80

---

## Page 81

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

AUG 1 5 19/s

TELL PE

ASSOC.

Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adm.

Dep.-A.D.-Inv....

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection Wiel

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. ---

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Fm.

Director Sec'y

NROOS AI CODE,

#MPR16

4:15 PM URGENT AUGUST 15, 1975 WCG

TO : DIRECIOR

(62-116395)

idiolod

FROM: ATYANTA (62-2854)

PSEN STUDY

75

RE BUREAU TELETYPE TO ATLANTA, AUGUST 14, 1975.

FORMER SA EDWARD F. GAMBER, HOME ADDRESS 2861 GANT

QUARTERS DRIVE, MARIETTA, GEORGIA, 30062, WAS CONIACTED BY

ASAC THIS DATE AND ADVISED CONCERNING CAPTIONED MATTER

IN ACCORDANCE WITH REBUTEL.

END

AUN FBIHQ CLR TU

rit.

.

Dưn,

(Gavelier

12-112315

* AUG 19 1975

555

REG- 102

5-5.17

84 AUG 2 0 1975

NW 65360 Docld:32989627-Page-81-

---

## Page 82

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530

August 14, 1975

Reid from sse stitles

10: John A. Mintz, Assistant Director

Legal Counsel Division

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FROM:

Michael E. Shaheen, Jr.

Special Counsel for Intelligence

(Coordination

SUBJECT: Senate Select Committee Request for Documents

#MDR16

Attached is a request from the Senate Select Committee dated

August 13, 1975, for underlying materials logically related to

Department of Justice file #82-46-5.

Please arrange for compliance

with this request as soon as possible.

-

treat as argenal 62 14395-534

REC- 102

AUG 19 1975 .

ENCLOSURE,

62-116395

5'

84 AUG 2 1 1975

SEVOLUNA

NW 63360 Docld:32989627 Page 82

---

## Page 83

NO CHURE DAO CECHARMAN

HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., TENN.

BAHRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.

CHARLES MCC. MATHIAS, JR., MI

ICHARO 5. SCHWEIKER, PA

CARY HANT, COLO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

Linited States Benate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RES. 21, STH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

. August 13, 1975

#MDR 16.

SPRAm 184G

Michael E. Shaheen, JI., Esg.

Special Counsel For

Intelligence Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

U.S. Department of Justice

Washington, D.C.

20530

Dear Mike:

On July 17, 1975, the Committee received from

the Department of

Justice a summary of the material in

departmental file io. 82-46-5. This was "in addition to

materials received by the Committee on June 25. 1975: -

The Committee now wishes staff access to all

underlying materials logically related to the above and

maintained in the files of the Justice Department and the

FBI.

Please expedite this request since it is of immedi-

ate

importance to the Committee.

Sincerely yours,

get weigh

John T. Elliff

Director

Domestic Intelligence Task Force

AUG 18 1y75

Mocld:32989627-Páge 83

62416395-534

ENCLOSURE,

---

## Page 84

tRUCIAL DURCAU UF iNVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

• AUG 1 3 1975

TELETYPE

NR 024 NY CODE

7:35 P.M. NITEL. 8-15-75 PLQ

1Q:

DIRECTOR, FBI

FROM :

SAC,

NEW

YOR K

(185 - 14660)

CONF

NTIAL

lities

ATTN

INTD

SENST UDY, 1975 .)

YORK 68T1-IA/ TELEPHONICALLY CONTACTED SPECIAL AGENT

JOSEPH U • PALGUTA ON AUGUST 13, 1975, AND FURNISHED THE FOLLOWING

INFOR MAT ION:

ON AUGUST 11, 1975; MR. PATRICK A. SHE Y

I, A MEMBER OF THE

SE NAIE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS (SSCIO),

TELEPHONICALLY CONTACTED

YORK 6811-IA

AND THEY MADE AN

APPOINIMENI TO MEET IN NYC AT 2:00 PM ON AUGUST 13, 1975. SOURCE

MET WITH SHEY AS ARRANGED ON AUGUST 13, 1975. SHEY TOLD SOURCE

THAI SAM JAFFE (FORMER NEW YORK 2524-S) VISITED A FRIEND OF HIS,

A MR. MILLER, WHO IS ALSO A MEMBER OF THE SSCIO. WHILE IN .,

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adme

Dep-A.D.-InVen

Asst. Dix.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident

Inspectio]

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rai. -

Director Sec'y

#M.DR 16 10125/00

SRJALMIHTE

002924724

itf.

tel to

84 AUG 1 9 1975

Www Knand Donide299067 Page 84

---

## Page 85

PAGE

TWO

NY 105 - 14660

CON

EN T

PLEASANI RELATIONSHIP WITH FORMER SPECIAL

AGE NIS (SAS) JOHN G •

WILLIS AND EDWARD F. GAMBER WITH REGARD IO SOVIET INTELLIGENCE

MATTERS.

(5)

DURING THE TIME THAT JAFFE WAS RELATING ABOVE DATA TO MILLER,

SENATOR CHURCH, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SSCIO ENTERED MILLER'S OFFICE

AND BECAME VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN JAFFE'S STATEMENIS. JAFFE .

RELATED TO MILLER THAT

AS A REPORTER FOR THE COLUMBIA BROADCASTING

COMPANY, HE COVERED THE STORY INVOLVING THE RELEASE OF FRANCIS G.

POWERS BY THE SOVIETS (POWERS WAS THE FORMER U-2 PILOT WHO WAS

SHOT DOWN IN THE USSR IN 1960). JAFFE RELATED TO MILLER THAT

THEREAFTER HE WENT TO HONG KONG. JAFFE ALSO TOLD MILLER THAT

WHEN HE RETURNED FROM HONG KONG ESOUR CE BELIEVES THIS IO BE IN

1966-19 68 3

HE LEARNED THAT HE WAS "FINGERED" BY A SOVIET

DEFECIOR BY THE NAME OF PENKOVSKIY. THIS DEFECTOR ALLEGEDLY

REPORTED THAT HE SAW JAFFE'S NAME ON A PIECE OF PAPER ON THE

DESK OF A SOVIET INTELLIGENCE OFFICER JAFFE TOLD MILLER IHAI

THE FBI, UPON LEARNING THAT INFORMATION FELT THAT JAFFE WAS A

"DOUBLE AGENT" BECAUSE OF THE COOLNESS OF BUREAU PERSONNEL TOWARD

HIM WHEN HE RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM HONG KONG • JAFFE

Nit 6o460 Doold: 32989627 Page 85

---

## Page 86

PAGE THREE

NY 105 - 14668

CONFIDE

ATIAL

TOLD MILLER THAT EVER SINCE HIS RETURN FROM HONG KONG, HE CANNOT

HOLD A JOB, AND BELIEVES THE FBI IS THE CAUSE OF HIS PREDICAMENT •

JAFFE IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE FBI IS BEING VINDICIIVE TOWARD

HIM IN PURSUING THIS MATTER AND DEPRIVING HIM OF MAKING A

LIVELIHOOD •

MR. SHEY TOLD THE SOURCE THAI THE SSCIO IS LOOKING INTO THE

ABOVE MATTER TO DETERMINE IF JAFFE'S STATEMENIS ARE TRUE, AND TO

DETERMINE IF SOME CONTROLS COULD BE CREATED SO THAT THE FBI COULD

NOT BE VINDICTIVE IN SIMILAR SITUATIONS.

SOURCE ADVISED THAT HE TOLD SHEY THAI HE KNEW NOTHING ABOUT

THE FBI'S ATTITUDE TOWARD JAFFE AFTER 1964, SINCE HE RETIRED FROM

THE BUREAU THAT YEAR

SOURCE ADVISED THAT SHEY TOLD HIM THAT AS

YET HE HAS NOT TALKED TO FORMER SA EDWARD F. GAMBER, BUT MAY

INTERVIEW HIM IN THE FUTURE •

SOURCE ADVISED THAT SHEY TOLD HIM THAT JAFFE IS CURRENTLY

EMPLOYED AS A FREE-LANCE REPORTER WORKING IN WASHINGION, DO.

SOURCE STATED THE HE INFORMED SHEY OF FORMER SA GAMBER'S CURRENT

EMPLOYME NI .

-N/ 65260 Rocld:32989627 Page 86

---

## Page 87

PAGE FOUR

NY 125 - 14660

CONFIDANIIAL

SOURCE ADVISED THAT HE MET WITH SHEY ON AUGUST 13, 1975 FROM

2:00 PM UNTIL 3:30 PM.

THE ABOVE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE SOURCE IN A

GUARDED MANNER, AND ONLY THE PERTINENT FACIS WERE OBTAINED •

THE NYO WILL PERSONALLY REINTER VIEW THE SOURCE REGARDING THE

ABOVE AND OBIAIN COMPLETE DETAILS CONCERNING THE MATTER.

CLASSIFIED B 2609, XEDS 2 AND 3, INDEFINLIE.

END .

LRF FBIHQ CLR

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 87

---

## Page 88

TO

FROM

SUBJECT

OSSAIN

eel

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

JULY :973 EDITION

SEGET RATERIAL

GSA1 FPMR 141 CFRI 101-17.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

W. Raymond Wannall

Assistant Director, Intelligence Division

DATE:

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Douglas R. Marvin

DiM Counselor to the Attorney General

IBS.

August 13, 1975•

132000

#MDR 16

BL10iol0o SPALm 116

Senate Select Committee Request for Information

on

Warrantiess Flectronic Surveillances

In accord with our telephone conversation of August 12th,

I am forwarding to you a letter from the Senate Select

Committee requesting answers to questions relating to

electronic surveillance conducted by the Federal govern-

ment in the interests of national security.

The Committee

has been told that we would try to respond to their

request by August 20th.

That date is fast approaching

and may not be a reasonable period of time in which to

compile the information requested and respond to their

..questions. That date is a useful target, however. since

any issues to be presented to the Attorney General with

icspact to complying to this request must be considered

yan, the

prior to August 19th, the date the Attorney General is

scheduled to leave Washington.

Would your office please prepare responses to the following

questions that involve areas with which, I believe, you

are familiar: questions 2-10, 11(b)-(d), 12, 14, 15, 17,

21 and 24.

Thank you.

Treat de arginis 632-532

9 AUG 19 1975

REG- 102

ENCLOSURE,

5-T

84 AUG

189 1975

NW 65360,

id:32989627 PagUugU.S. Saving*Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 89

HOST

R43E

MW23S530102022

oredoi

«rain"ine.

++9688)058s +001 499 889-789498

• Gilsie, 5, 100'01.

703,1. 1.211, rid..

сол. со.c.

812084105. Sebrittli-Its. 5n-

cos.0.

CURTIST. SMIMICS, MINSIRIT: CON•ISEL

ZErilo Biales Senate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY COVERINENTAL UNTRATIONS WITH

FLESPECT TO INTELLIGENLE ACTIVITIES

(FIRSUAST TO 3, RES, 31, 1613I COMONCIO)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

July 7, 1975

cOpy 6_ 0F8

# mDe 16.

11d0/00

SPZALMIJTE

The Honoraile Edward H. Levi

Attorney General

u. S. Department of Justice

Washingtor, D. C. 20530

Dear Mr. Atiorney General:

Thank you fox vour letters öf June 24 and Jine

25, 12elating to electronic surveillance conducted

the federäl government in the interests of national

by

sec?-

rity and

Loreign incaligence.

The Salace Conmities also

appreciates your providing the information of a sensitive

HON JuaC 2A, 1075.

Your letters, and the

recent testimony of Kevin

T. Maroney and Clarence M. achley before the house Sui

committee on Courts, Civil Ilberties,

and the Adrinistration

of Justice, have raised several additional questions which

the Committee wishes to pursue.

Fuither questions

are

raised by the Jaly 1. 1975, White House news briefing by

the Press Sucretary relating to the effect of the recent

Zueibon decision.

Some of these questions

relate to general

policy considorations in the electronic surveillance area;

others address our need for a more complete factual base

from which va can draw our concisions.

a list of these

questions is attached

i to this letter.

These questions, of

course, do not supersade prior requests for material

relating to electronic surver lance, which are itonized in

the document requests o May Tir Jme Is, and June 2T

Rather, they should be considered as supplementasy to

the prior requesis.

hiV 65360 Docld:32989621 Page 89

ENCLOSURE,

bo: 111-3751-5311

---

## Page 90

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

Page two

SECRET

July 7, 19%5

I believe that the answers to these questions

are e sential to a complete understanding of the policies

and 1:ocedures followch by the Justice Department in elec-

tron

c surveillance cases. Full information on these mat-

ters is necessary for the Committee to fulfill its mandate

"to ecommend the enactment of any new legislation.

nect isary or desirable to strengthen or clarify the national

security, intelligence, or surveillance activities of the

United States and to protect the rights of United States

citizens with regard to these activities."

With the con-

tinued cooperation of the Justice Department, I am convinced

that the Committee. will be able to discharge

• this respon-

sibility in the critical area of national security electronic

surveillance.

Sincerely,

Frank Chusch

Chairman

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 90

---

## Page 91

24116/00 SF2ALM/A16

SECRLT

Warrantless Electronic Surveillance for National Security Purposes

I.

16°

2.

3.

With respect to the "Special Revicw Group" which you

have established within the office of the attorney

consensual clectionic surycillance without a judicial

warrant, the following questions are asked:

a. What have been the names and titles of the persons

serving on the Special Review Group?

b. If the Assistant Attorney General of the Criminal

• Division is not a member of the Special Review

Group, does he normally have the opportunity.to

review requests for warrantless electionicisur-

veillance?

Have any individuals other than those serving on

the Special Review Goup of the. Assistant Attorney

General of the Criminal Division had the opportunity

¿o sevion icquesis

; fui variantloss alcationic sur-

veillance? TE co, whom?

Does the Special. Review Grouy have the authority

to deny rcquests for warrantless electronic sur-

veillance?

€:

Does the Special Review Group review requests for

reauthorizations of varrantless elcotronic surveil-

lance?

Do Justice Department standards and procedires for the

authorization and icauthorization of varcantless elec-

tronic surveillance

require the concurrence of the

State Department in the request for such surveillancé?

If so, in what üypes oi cases is such concurrence re-

quired?

what procedures, if any, have been folowed to obtain

the concurience of the State Departmont in the request-

for warrantless electronic surveillance?

-NW-65360_Docld:32989627-Page 91

---

## Page 92

2 -

4.

What have been the identities of the agencies and the

Presidential appointces who have initialca requusts

for warrantless electronic surveillance from 1966 to

the present?

5.

liow many such rcquests have been initinted by each

agency and cach presidontial appointce?

6.

How many of the requests initiated by each ayency and

Presidential appoinice have been approved by the

- Attorney General?

7.

How many requests have. been made by each agency and

each Presidential appointee for the continuation of

previously approved surveillance?

8. How many of the requests for the continuation of pre-

-

viously approved surveillance made by each agency and

each Presidential appointee nave been approved by the

setazney. General?

-.....•.

9.

What procedures have been followed for the review of

all such survillance on a regular basis to ensure

that. the criteria for the surveillance are satisfied?

10..

With respect to non-consensual clecironic surveillance

instituted outside the Unitca states by agencies of

the United States jovernment, the following questions

are asked:

•a: What have been the standards and proccaures, if

any, established for the authorization and review

of such susveillance?

b.

d..

What has been the total number of such surveil-

lances by jear and by month for each year from

1966 to the present?

What have been the identities of the agencies and

the Presidential appointees who have initiaica such

requests from 1966 to the present?

How many such requests have been initiated by cach

agency and each Presidential appointee?

How many of the requests initiatca by each agency

and

cach Presidential appointee have been approved

by the Altorney General?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 92

---

## Page 93

-3 -

i1.

TECH

f.

How many roquests have beenmade by cach agency and

each Presidential appointee for the continuation uf

such previously approved surveillance?

g. How many of the requests for the continuation of

such previously

approved surveillance have. bech

approved by the Attorncy General?

h.

For cach ycar fron 1966 to the present, how many

such surveillances have been instituied in (1)

North Anerica, other than the United States; (2)

South Ancrica; (3) Western Europe; (4) Fastern

Europe; (5) Africa; (6) the Middle East; (7) South-

east Asia; (8) the rest of Asia?

i.

For each year from 1966 to the present, how many

such surveillances have been directed

at subjects

who are United States citizens?

%

with respect to the requironent that the attorney

General must be satisfied that the subject of the

suT-

•veillance "plans unlawful activity directca against a

förcign power or a foreign-based political gioup",

the following questions are aakoa:

a. To what extent does the iccent decision in

weison ys to tell by the United States cont

of Appeals

District of Columbia limit or

othorwise affect this standard?

b. What has been the total number of subjects under

surveillance and installations for telephone and

microphone surveillance rcquested and approved

under the standard "plans unlawful activity directed

against a foreign fover"

and under the standard

"plans unlawful activity dirccted against a

foreign-based political group" for each year

from 1966 to the present?

c. How many of the subjects in each category and for

each year idertified in "y" above have been united

States citizens?

d. What have been the identities of all "foreign-

4.32

based political groups" related to the surveillances

ww identifica in "" above?

в?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 93

---

## Page 94

-4

!!

SECRET

With respect to the requirement that the Attorney

General must be satisfied that the subject of the

surveillance is "assisting a foreign pover or foleign-

based political groip", the following questions are

asked:

What has been the iotal number of subjects under

surveillance and installations for telephone and

microphone surveillance requested and ayproved

under the standard

"assisting a foreign power"

and under the standard "assisting a foreign-based

political group" for each year from 1966 until the

present?

D.

How many of the subjects in each category and for

each year identified in "a" above have been United

States citizens?

i3.

lances identifica

in "a" above?

wath respect to the requirement tnat une Attorney

Gencral. must be satisfica that the requested surveil-

lunce is. "necessary for national security or foreign

intelligence purposes important to national security",

the Following questions are asked:

a. Is this standaid intended to supplant the standard

for national security electonic surveillance

under. former Attorney Goneral Elliot Richardson

11.C., that the proposed surveillance must be

necessary to protect the Nation against actual or

potential altack or any other hostile action of a

foreign pover, that it be necessary to obtain

forcign intelligence information acemed essential

to the security of the United States, or that it

be nocessary to protect national security informa-

tion against foreign intelligence activities)?

b.

Is this standard intended to modify the standard

for national socurity clectronic surveillance under

former Attorney General Elliot Richardson?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 94

---

## Page 95

14.

1s.

- 5 -

SECREI

C.

If the answer to'"a" or "j" above is yes, what is

the reason (s) for such change?

à.

If the answer to "a"' or "b" above is yes, what is

the precise legal authority supporting such change

in the formulation of the standard?

e.

If the answor to "a" or "b" above is yos, what is

the reason(s) for the duletion of the word "essen-

tial" from the formulation of the standard undex

former Attorney General Elliot Richardson?

I. If the answer to "a" or "b" above is yes, plcase

•give examples of hypothetical situations where

national security electronic surveillance would be

permitted: (1) under the current standard but not

under the former standard, and (2) under the former

standard but not under the current standard..

What have been the standards and procedures, if any.

that have been established for

determining that "the

minimun physical intrusion necessary to obtain the

information will be usca"?

in cases of "leaks" of

information deaned either

"es-

sential" or "important" to the security of the United

States, the followiny questions are asked:

a. Has there been a Justice Depastment policy specifi-

cally addressed to such cases?

•b. Have there been Justice Department standurds or

procedures specifically addressed to such cases?

c. Have surveillanges in such cases been approved by

the Attorney General under the standard "assisting

i a foreign pover or a foreign-based political group"?.

a. If the answer to "c" above is no, under what stan-

dard have surveillances in such cases been approved?

e.

What has been the total number of subjects under

surveillance and installations for telephone and

-

microphone surveillance requested and approvna for

such cases for each yoat fron 1966 to the present?

NW-65360-Doeld 32989627-Page_95

---

## Page 96

6-

f.

9.

ho.

i.

What have been the identities of the agencies and

the Prosidential appointces who have initialcd

requests for varrantless electionic suiveillance

in sụch cases from 1905 to the present?

How many such requests have boon initiated by each

agency and each Presidential appointee?

llow many of such roquests initiated by each agency

and cach Presidential appoinice have boch approved

by the Attorney General?

Of the total number of subjects under surveillance

in such cases for each year fiom 1966 lo the

present, how many were (1) employees of news media.

organizations; (2) current employces of the federal

government; (3) formos employces of the federal

government; (4) other?

16. With icspoct to the dissemination of information obtain-

ed fron national security electronic surveillance, the

-.

-following questions ana ashed:.:

= what boys boon the sionderas aid graceues for the

dissemination ot

such information?

b.

• '

What have been the identitics of the agencies and

Presidential appointces who hive received inforna-

tion obtained from national sucurity electronic

surveillance for cäch year from 1966 to the present?

What have boch the standards and procedures for the

dissemination of such information

request for the surveillance?

17. Can additional monthly data on warrantless clectronic

surveillances prior to November 1972 be made available

in vicw of the fact that the FBI vas able to precisely

state the number of warrantless electronic surveillances

in operation on nineteen separate days, ranging from

March 4, 1965, to March 31, 1972, in response to

i re-

quest by the Select Committee?

(By lelter of June 9,

1975, the FBI'S Office of the Director informed

the

committce ot the nunber of warrantloss clectronic

•NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 96

---

## Page 97

7-

SECRET

surveillances in opcration on, thirty days bofore,

and thirty days after tostimony by the Director be-

fore the llouse Appropriations Conniütee from 1965. to

the present.)

18.

In his tortinony before the House Subcomittce on

Courts, Civil libertics, and the Administration of

Justice, Kevin I. Maroney,

Doputy Assistant Attorncy

• Ceneral. for the Criminal Division, stated in reference

to a three-man Executive Branch commission used in

Grcat Britain to review applications for national

security clectronic surveillance, "whether such a com-

nission rould be feasible under our system

think it night well be."

...

Is it the official position

of

the Justice

Department that a similar commission

composed of Executive Branch officials would be an

acceptable altercative to the prescht system for

authorizing national security electionic surveillance?

1.9 co

In the testimony referred to above, ir. Haroney also

stated,

"I think the department has previously con-

mitted

itself

to complete disclosure to an over-

sight connittce.

Falariag

"with respect to this statenent, the

maalian tre saladi

a.. When

1 and in thai context has the Justice Dopait-

ment commiited

itself to complete disclosure to an

oversight connittee?

b.

What material of infornation, if any, that relates

to the authorization for, identities of the sub-

jects of, conduct of, and dissomination of infor-

mation from particular elecironic surveillances

would the Justice Department be unvilling to dis-

close to an oversight comnittee?

20.

What is the basis for Justice Department opposition to.

the concept of a specially-designated court, composed

of one or three federal judges, which would Icview

applications for warrants in cases of national secu-

rity electronic surveillance?

21. In his testimony before the llouse Subcommittee on

Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Adninistration of

Justice, Clarence M. Kellcy stated that, he would accept

a requirenent of judicial variants for national security

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 97

---

## Page 98

- 8 -

SECRIE

22.

23.

• eloctronic surveillance if the standard for issuance

of the warrant was "Joss than probable cause"

When

sked by Mc. Badillo what the appropriate standard

should be, he answered, "I think reasonable grounds,

that as a xrsult of cho purbull of an invostigation

(it is), possible lo ballore that there has been intel-

will be, or there

a nced for the gathering of

Jigence."

Does this statement reflect the official

position of the FBI in icgard to (1) a varrant require-

ment for national socurity electronic surveillance, and

(2) the appropriate stardara for the issuance of a

warrant?.

.

what have been the standards and procedures followed

by the Justico Department for the authorization and

conduct of national socurity clectronic :urveillance

where one (but not all) of the parties to the conver-

sation consents to the monitoring?

With respect to the July l white House nows briefing

by pon Nessen relating to the effect of the. Zweibon

• decision, the following questions are asked:

what a the nature no the careerive trom die

President to the Attorney General, referred to by

Mr. Nessen, relating to Justice Departnent policy

and procedures for clectronic surveillance of

b.

C.

f.

How docs this diroctive affect Justice Department

policy and procca ros for elcctronic surveillance

. of United States citizens?

Will the Justico Department support legislative

proposals that dould require a court order for. any

electronie surveillance, as was indicated by.

Mr. Nessen's statement?

If the answer to "c" above is yes, which of the

pending bills in Congress, if any, would the

Justice Departnent be willing to support?

If the answer to "c" above is yes, what would the

Justice Department consider to be

the appropriate

judicial standard for the issuance of a varrant?..

If the answer to "c" above is yes, what would the

Justico Depurtlicat consider to be the appropriate

kor couts to issue such warrant?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 98

---

## Page 99

- 9-

24.

with rospect to eloctionic surveillance directed at

encoded, non-conversational communications conducted

in the interests of nutional security and forcign

intelligence, the following questions are asked:

a. What were the total number of such surveillances

for: each year from 1966 to 1969?

b.

What have been the idontities of the agencies and

the Presidontial appointees who have initiated

requests for such surveillance for each year from

1966 to the present?

c. How many such requests have been initiated by

each agency and each Presidential appointee for

each ycar from. 1966 to the present?

à.. How many of such Icquests initiated by each agency

and each Prosidential appointee have been aprroved

by the Attorney Coneral for each year from 1966 to

-the present?

e. how

many requests have been made by cuch agency

and

l cach Presidential appointee for the continua-

tion of such previously approved surveillance for

each year From 1966 to tha progento

{:

How many of the requests made by cach agency and

each Presidential appointee for the continuation

of such previously approved surveillance have been

approved by the Attorney General for cach year.

from 1965 to the present?

.g.. For. each year from 1966 to the present, how any

such surveillances

have been instituted in (l) the

United Staies; (2)

North Ancrica, other than the

United States; (3)

South Amexica; (4) Restern

Furope; (5) Fastern Furope; (6) Africa; (7) the

Middle Bast; (8) Southcast Asia; (9) the rest of

Asia?

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 99

---

## Page 100

The Attofnoy General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams &

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 8, 1975

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. V.

V. Kolombatovic

(Attn: Mr. L. A. Crescioli

1 - Mr. T. J.

McNiff

Enclosed for your information is the original of a

nemorandun concerning an interview by Stair Mombors of captionod

Committeo of FBI Spocial Agent Louis A. Crescioli. A copy

of this menorandun is also enclosed for forwarding to

Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Counsel to the President.

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

I ~ The Doputy Attorney General

Attention:

Michael E. Shaheen

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

1 - 62-23533

1 - 67- (Louis A. Crescioli)

TJM :dntr

(13)

REG- 102

62415322-536

19 AUG 13 1975 / 1

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com..

Gen. Inv, -

Ident.

ingest

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun.

reggphone

No To Bodid 29

DATE 2/0/82 BYSI

/COLESUME

MAILED 7

AUG I 11975

*-FBI

Page 100 LETYPE UNIT O

GPO 954-546

---

## Page 101

I - Mr.

J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

ALL GRAHAMANY DONTAINED

. - Mx. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. V. V. Kolombatovic

62-116395 KE

August 8, 1975

1812 8/12/82

(Attn: Mr. L. A. Crescioli)

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE:

INTERVIEN OF SPECIAL AGENT LOUIS A. CRESCIOLI

BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE STAFF MEMBERS

Set out below is information concerning an interview

of special Agent Louis_A

Crescioli by Senate Select Committee (SSC)

DiaTI HemperS. Mr. Cresciolt, who has been a Bureau Agent

Since September, 1954, is currently assigned to FBI Headquarters,

Domestic Liaison, handling liaison responsibilities with the

military and the U. S. Postal Service.

On advance notice from Mr. James Dick, SSC Staff Member,

Ir. Crescioli was advised that he was to be interviewed at 2:00

was informed by this Bureau's Legal Counsel

Division that he was

i being released from any applicable employment

agreement for purpose of this interview as it relates to Bureau

liaison operations with regard to the U. S. Postal-Service.

Mr. Crescioli was advised there were certain areas concerning

which he would not be required to answer questions, namely:

information which might divulge the identities of FBI sources;

information relating to sensitive nethods and techniques;

information which might adversely affect on-going FBI investigations

and information which originated with other agencies, including

After meeting at the Senate Office Building with Staft

lembers at the scheduled time, it was learned the interview of

HiT.

Crescioli would occur in Room 610 of the Carrol Arms Hotel

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

which is located across the street from the Senate Office Building,

Dep. AD Inv. -

Washington, D. C.

The interview commenced at approximately 2:05

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

p.Il., and was conducted by Mr. Dick and his SSC Staff Associate

Comp. Syst. -

Paul Wallach,

Special Agent Thomas J. McNiff, FBI Headquarters,

Ext. Affairs -

-accompanied Mr. Crescioli and was present during the interview.

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

- 62-23533

Inspection

Intelt. (C

67- (Louis A. Crescioli)

"Laboratory

Plon, & Evol. _T.JM: mt d.

Spec. Inv. -

SEE

NOTE PAGE

4

Training -

(12)

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. _

NW 6536-Docla:3298982

ENCLOSURE

TOPLETYPE UNIT

Prin

GPO 954-545

---

## Page 102

UNITED STATES SENATE SELICE COMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNIENTAL, ORERATIONS

VITA RESPECT TO INTCLZICINCE ACTIVITIIS

At tho outsot lir, Croscioli was inforned of his

rights; namely, that ho did have a right to an attorney, that

the intervion was ontirely voluntary and that he could refuse

to answer any questions asted of hin. the intorview included

the following nuestions asked by lessrs. Dicl: and Wallach whick

are deemod pertinent:

In order to assess the experienco of Special Agent

Crescioli, his prior Eureau background was requested. Ir. Crescioli

responded

that he entered on duty as a Special Agent in September,

1054, and served in five field offices handling both crininal

and sccurity matters prior to his assignont to FBI Headquarters.

During the poriod 1000-73, It. Croscioli was assigned as in FBI

Icadquartors Supervisor handling substantivo cases in tho

internal security area.

From 1073 to Novembor, 1974, he was

assigned to the Foreign Liaison Unit of the Liaison Section,

and from Novenber, 1974,

to the presont, he has been assigned

to the Domestic Liaison

Unit handling liaison specifically

with the military and U. S. Postal Service.

Hessrs. Pallach and Dick wore most interestod in

nscortnining tho procedure folloved by lix. Croscioli to securo

authority to be present at this interviow. Ho was specifically

queried as to the namos of the individuals who authorized hig

attendance and what coments of instructions, it any, those

Bureau officials gave him.

hir'. Crescioli responded by stating

that upon receiving a telophone call from ir. Dick requesting

his appearance, a monorandun sotting forth this request was

prepared by lir. Crescioli and "walked through" various Durenu

lovols for approvnl. Tho idontities of Curcau officinls approvins

the nonorandun were made known to these stalt l'embors, hovover,

it was pointed out to them that no particular comment of

pertinence to instant mattor was recalled by it. Croscioti ns

having been made by any of these officials.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 102

---

## Page 103

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNHENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

To the question as to what problems have been

experienced by hir. Crescioli with the Postal Servico since

assuning his role of Linison Officor, Mr. Croscioli rosponded

that cooporation with the Postal Servico has beon excolleni

and no real problems have been encountered.

Ir. Crescioli

explained that he has visited the Postal Inspection Service

on the average of once every two wecks since November, 1974.

He added that on occasion ho will bo telophoned by an official

of the Inspoction Sorvice with a question regarding a national

security mail cover requested by the TBI, a question regarding

¿ralning proccdures or a question rogarding handling of

Frecdon of Incoration Act requests. In his liaison capacity,

Ir. Crescioli would inttiate the necessary arrangements to

have these questions resolved and the answer returned to the

Postal Inspection Sorvice.

Mr. Wallach asked Mr. Crescioli if he ever visited the Postal

Inspection Service to meroly "chat" with the Postal Inspectors.

Mir. Crescioli responded that because of his heavy liaison

responsitilitics with agencics other than the Postal Service

ho did not have tino to visit tho Postal sorvice for ocher

than official rensons.

When asked if the various FBI fiold offices have

liaison representatives with the various logional Postal

Inspectors in Charge, Ir. Croscioli responded that with

regard to national security nail covers, the Special Agent

in Charge of the local FBi office is the designated Buroau

linison contact with tho Ilogionnl Postal Inspector in Chargo.

The above Staii Nenbers woro interested in ascertaining

whether or not national security mail cover checks were routed

through Nr. Crescioli prior to delivery to the Chick Fostal

Inspactor.

Mr. Crescioli sesponded that these mail cover

requests are not routed through him for review but rather are

routed through nornal Dureau channels prior to delivery by

Courior Servico to the Chief Postal Inspoctor.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 103

---

## Page 104

UNITED CINTOS DENITE NELECE COINITIN

FITIL FISTICE TO INIEULIGUICE NOTIVIZICG

When asked if ho know of furonu Arents actually

boing opgaced in physically landling tho ceil in nay Post

IDEORICA DIZE MO 1OU NO LDONLOCES DI CUSA DOCIVITICS.

1»* Crescioll pointel ouè that to hie Inoraudeo 312 unil

cover requests vere fornided to propor lostal authoritios

zor hradling by lostal enployces only.

In concluaios, Ur. Vallech innudiod i1 Hi- Cresciols

had knowledgs of the mason for the discontinuance of nail

covers by the Ibi no an investigativo tocaniquo for a period

os tino in tho rast.

VI. Cresciold Iispondod that lc had to

inculedgo de chis ratéor.

At this point, the intorvice nos terinated at

approxinatoly 2:00 p-l+, with both Messrs. Fallnch and Dict

expressing thoir appreciation of lr. Croscioli's appearzaco

and responsos on this occision.

1 - The Attorney General

NOME:

Rosults of abovo interview fron notations nade

by Special Agent Croscioli at the conclusion of the intervier.

Special Agent Ichiff, the dictator, has reviewed the above

and has noted

no discrepancies between reported results of

the interview and that which transpired on the above occasion.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 104

---

## Page 105

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

5010-106

MAY 1962 "DITION

GSEGEN. RETINO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Assoc. Dir. —

Dep. AD Adm. -

Memorandum

1 - J. A. Mintz

Dep. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

(Attn: J.B. Hotis)

Admin..

Mc. W. R. Wannall, pu

1 - W. R.

Wannall

Comp. Syst..

Ext. Affairs

DATE:

8/6/75

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

FROM : J. G. Deegan

1 - W. O. Cregar

Inspection.

1 - J. G. Deegan

Intell.

Laboratory

SUBJECT;

SENSTUDY - 75

AMPR16

1 - H. A. Newman

Legal Coun. -

Plan. & Eval. -

THAT TING CONCATHED

Spec. Inv. -

Training.

... 516

Telephone Rm. --

Director Sec'y -

Through arrangements made by Mr. John Hotis, Legal

Counsel Division, Unit Chief Homer A. Newman, IS-1 Section, b

his for

Intelligence Division, was interviewed for the purpose of

developing general information regarding the handling of

informant files within the FBI by Mr. John T. Elliff and

Mr. Mark Gitenstein of the Domestic Intelligence Task Force!!

U. S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities.

The interview was conducted on 8/4/75 in FBI space and

lasted from approximately 2:00 p.m. until 2:30 p.m.

The interview was extremely general in nature and

dealt exclusively with general information regarding the

handling of informant files both in the field and at FBIHQ.

The questions asked dealt with such matters as what type of

files were maintained in the field and at FBIHQ regarding

informants and generally the types of information contained

therein. They were particularly interested as to whether or

not an individual informant file either at FBIHQ or in the

field would contain information which would specifically

identify informants other than the informant on which the

file was maintained. They also inquired whether or not there￾

was a sub A section of each informant file maintained at FBIHQ

as was the case in the field. Questions were also asked as to

whether or not the individual file maintained at FBIHQ on

informants would run into several volumes.

This inquiry was

answered to the effect that the size of the file would depend

on the activity of the informan for 10s dad been e

operated, etc.

3.

can

HAN: cah (6)

REG- 102

9 AUG 19 1975

CONTINUED OVER

6r916355

8 4 AUG 1 9 1975

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 105

---

## Page 106

a--5z

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re: Senstudy

It was readily apparent that they were asking these

questions with the thought in mind of requesting access to

certain informant files, the identity of which they already

had but did not divulge.

They did state specifically that

the informant files in which they would have an interest

amounted to approximately ten and were all on informants

that had publicly been exposed for one reason or another

and were no longer being operated as current informants.

The indication was that the request would be for access

only to such files for review in FBI space.

ACTION:

For information.

SEES

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 106

---

## Page 107

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1YO2 COMON

•GSA EPAR (41 CFR 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

: Mr. J.

B.

Adams

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

DATE: 7/30/75

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

SUBJECT: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAI

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

The purpose of the memorandum is to set forth

In

summary form the requests we have received from various Com-

mittees in Congress and the status of our replies.

Senate Select Committee

On Intelligence Activities (Church's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 5/14/75

Includes among other things

information concerning wire-

taps, including the recon-

struction of Bureau files,

as well as Inspection sur-

veys for ten offices.

Assoc, Dis. _

Dap. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Laboratory

, Legal Coun. -

(Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. inv. -

Training -

Telophone Rm. 1.

Director Sec'y

Status

42-116

Responses to most

questions prepared,

approved, anc

delivered.

Same

responses are avat

'ing White House

idy

or Departmental

approval.

Letter, 6/27/75

Request for information

Department seekin

concerning alleged abuses.

clarification.

Letter, 6/30/75,

Request pertaining to

received by

COÍNTELPRO.

• Partial response

delivered.

Bureau, 7/8/75

Letter, 7/3/75

Letter,: 7/8/75

Requests documents pertain-

Response being

ing to COINTELPRO be furnish- prepared

•ed to the Committee in Com-

mittee spaceREC- 102

62-116395

Communication to all em-

Response being

ployees. concerning Senate

prepared.

Select Committee inquiries.

AUG 19 1975

1 - Mr. Wannall

(Attn :

. Mx.

1 - Mrs. Metcalf

cregar) 4

XEROX ?

AUG 19. 1975

JFH

1 - Mr. Mintz

1: - Mr. Hotis

1 - MI. Daly

CONTINUED - OVER S

8 41

48

NW 6536010Bocld:32989627 Page 107

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 108

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE:

STATUS. OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL.

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Date of Request

Letter, 7/14/75

Nature of Request

Status

Request concerning two highly Response being

sensitive Bureau programs in prepared.

the foreign intelligence

field.

Letter, 7/14/75

PONIERO documents.

Response being

prepared.

Letter, 7/14/75

Material pertaining to

Awaiting Depart-

Martin Luther King.

mental decision.

Letter, 7/14/75

Material pertaining to

Response being

Ku Klux Klan.

prepared.

Letter, 7/16/75

Information regarding

Response being

functions of Attorney Gen-

prepared.

vision of and policy-making

for internal security and

activities.

Letter,: 7/23/75

List of people interviewed

Response prepared

In Ode Inspection Review.

and delivered to

Department:

Letter, 7/24/75

List of Agents in New York

Response being

City area who had surname

prepared.

"Kehoe."

Letter,: 7/28/75

Superseding request for FBI Response being

materials for delivery and/or prepared.

access of Committee:

Committee on the Judiciary

Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights (Tunney's Comnittee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter,: 7/18/75

Material concerning Flag-

Response being

ice pon and dee systems

prepared.

CONTINUED - OVER

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 108

---

## Page 109

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Subcommittee on Oversight

Committee on Ways and Means (Vanik's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 7/14/75

Description of FBI's in-

formant programs.

Status

Response awaiting

Bureau's approval.

House Select Committee (Pike's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter, 7/22/75

All documents and materials Being discussed

provided to the Senate Select with Department.

Committee to Study Governmental

Operations and request for all

materials related to budgetary

Letter, 7/24/75

Review documents and

materials related to

budgetary matters.

Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights

House Judiciary Committee (Edwards Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 7/9/75

Requested information

concerning surreptitous

entry.

Letter, 7/15/75

Requested information per-

Briefing concerning

Budget Matters being

arranged.

Status

Response prepared

and delivered to

Department.

Response prepared

and delivered to

Department

gressional Committees.

Hearings

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Request to arrange testimony Date of testimony

has not been

Rote angel of ate Po

established.

Office and Civil Service Com-

mittee concerning mail covers

and mail openings.

CONTINUED - OVER

- 3 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 109

---

## Page 110

RE :

STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Hearings (continued)

Date of Request

7/29/75

Nature of Request

Orally advised by Committee

staft members letter sent :

requesting Bureau testimony

relating to Budget matters.

Status

Testimony. to be

8/7 or 8/8/75.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

sir got

pro

Per

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 110

---

## Page 111

OFTIONAL FORA NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITIONA

GSA FRAR 141 CFR) 101-18.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

omp. Syst. -

xt. Affairs _

Mr. J. B. Adams

FROM : Legal Counse

SUBJECT:

DATE: 7/24/75

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Cregar

1 - Mr. Hotis

Attn: Mr. Daly

1 - Mr. Mintz

Inspection-

loron Py

On the afternoon of July 24, 1975, K. William O'Connor, Special

Counsel in the Department, met with Deputy Associate Director Adams

and me to present us with a copy of the proposed procedures and to discuss

any amendments the Bureau might request. I asked Mr. O'Connor who had

approved this latest draft of the proposed procedures and he said that they

had been tentatively approved by the Attorney General and the White House.

I specifically asked him who in the White House had approved them and

he said that they had been approved by Mr. Buchen (Counsel to the

President).

SPZALBILITG

PROPOSED PROCEDURES FOR ACCESS

TO FBI MATERIALS BY THE-SENATE

SELECT COMMITTEE

8

Mr. Adams and I discussed the procedures with Mr. O'Connor

and suggested to him as indicated by my inked notation on the bottom of

page 2A that the word 'use" used in subparagraph (d) should be further

defined by a footnote that would specify the limitations on information to be

provided the Committee and its staff concerning the identities of persons

to whom the FBI has undertaken an obligation of confidentiality. Mr. O'Connor

agreed to the proposed change and in our presence telephonically communicated

with John Elliff and obtained his concurrence in the amendment to sub-

paragraph (d).

REC- 102

10111137

Mr. Adams told Mr. O'Connor that the FBI was not agreeing

to the procedures in substance but that we recognized the authority of the

Attorney General in these matters and would abide by his decision that the

proposed procedures would be implemented on agreement by the Committee.

Mr. O'Connor said he understood that and he advised John Elliff that the

Bureau had acquiesced in the proposed procedures with the one amendment

described above. Mr. O'Connor departed indicating that he was going to

proceed to meet with the Committee and obtain final agreement as to the text

of the proposed procedures. The drait of the procedures is attached for the

Directstisanformation.

JUL 30 1975

Enc.

JAM:mfd

UG(5)9 1975

LEST

CONTINUED - OVER

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

NW 65366-Docld:32989621

Page 111

---

## Page 112

vi .

Memorandum to Mr. Adams

Re: Proposed Procedures for Access to

FBI Materials by SSC

RECOMMENDATION:

That this memorandum and the proposed draft of the proposed

procedures be forwarded for the information of the Director.

-2-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 112

---

## Page 113

толії

ALт/1T6

PROPOSED PROCEDURES

(1) The Domestic Tasir Force Leader will submit periodically a list

pertaining

of speciese materials, mateust to the inquiry being conducted under

S.R. 21, to which i: Comittee staff wishes access or of which the

Committee dentist re. her questions as to the scoolger meating

of any portion of ouch list shall be identified by the Special Counsel

and discussed at the fine of acceptance of the list, between the DIFL

and the Special Corn d

The first suon list will be delivered to the Department of

Justice within 48 hous of the adoption of this procedure, and will

sunmarize and supers.': all the presently outstanding requests; this

list will be in pricit., order, as fixed by the Cormittee, with fixed

delivery/access dat. pechied. trose materiais for which the com

mittee requests delivery or access shall be delivered to the Committce

or made accesible in hoom 4171 of the Hoover Building not later than

within 48 26 hours of the date specified. The Committee Chairman and

Vice Chairman shall be inforned by he Attorney General, within 24 hours

each

of receipt of be request, of any delay beyond 18'96 hours, the expected

length of the delay, and the specific reasons for the delay. Partial

access or delivery shali be proffered, by the Bureau of/ to any materials

requested, while the balance of such materials are being prepared. A

partial proffer shall nuü extend the time of full response set forth

herein.

 Wherever used herein, the tezn Dorestic Task Force Leader (DIL.)

Staff Director,

is understood to inciule the Chief Counsel and the Minority Counsel

of the Senate Select Comittee.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 113

ENCLOSURE

62-116395

_50:

---

## Page 114

- 2 -

These procedures shall apply to all matters covered by para-

graph 1. In the event of a specific problem arising with the

applicability of these procedures to any matters in current litigation

on any mate in tich criminal prosecution is pending, or any matter

which the Atz.d3y General shall specifically designate as extraordinarily

sensitive, a unecial procedure shall be undertaken.* Such specific

problem areas shill be identified by the Attorney General to the Chairman

and Vice Chai. by letter upon consideration of the lists submitted

pursuant to this provision. The special procedure to be followed shall

be proposed, 'eined, adopted, and followed after consideration by the

SSC of the sucific problem area and pertinent inquiry and discussion at

the staff level.

ill Ine jouoring procedures snal apply (a) where delivery of materials

requested mign: tarpardize FBI sensitive sources or ongoing operations,

or (b) where tr! lomestic Task Force Leader requests access to materials,

rather than a-livery to the SSC.

(3) The Departmant will fumish access at the Hoover Building in Room

4171 to those materials requested:

(a) only to the members

of the Comittee, where it is determined

by the Attorney Ceneral that the materials involve peculiarly sensitive

foreign intelligence sources or peculiarly sensitive ongoing foreign

intelligence operations.

* No restriction of currently operational arrangements is intended under

this provisic.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 114

---

## Page 115

2A

(b) In all other cases, to the appropriately cleared staff who

will has

soross so al? of the materials.

(e) in comption 10 (a) and (b) above is made for the identities

of so-callid "ive" infcimants or potential informants as defined in the

FBI Manual Di Instructions as to which no access will be fumished

unless the iconily of che individual as an informant on potential

informant has swindy been made known to the Cormittee, jointly agree

on the lintied «isclosure of such identities to the Chairman and Vice

Chairman.

(d) As 20 other infomation which would identify persons, as

SULLEss me Mara Mirinee di continuo to Provido information Ee tec

FBI, and as iO linve identity the FBI has undertaken an obligation of

confidentiality. the Committee and its staff shall preserve the

confidentiality ind shall nake no use which would impair the confi-

dentiality of ilds class of information to which access has been

given, uniess the identity of the individual as a source has already

been made known to the Committee, or unless such information appears

in materials which have been screened by the FBI as provided in

paragraph 6 balow.

Etemples of pistibited uses are: Cinterriews the sue @'interniec

o other inquines that wared dis hose the fact the identity of a

confidential sover was male known

I to the staff; @public dis closere

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 115

---

## Page 116

-3--

(4) Those materials to which the staff has access may be reviewed

and studied in Room 4171 of the Hoover Building and such notes may

be taken as deemed appropriate by the Staff.

(5) The Cormittee staff shall select from these materials to which

access is herein provided, those naterials which it deems pertinent

to the Committee's inquiries and necessary for delivery to the

Committee's offices.

NW. 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 116

---

## Page 117

- If a

(6) The Bureau shall make copies of such materials as are specified

by the staff under the provisions of (5) above for transfer to the

Comnittee's offices

(a) before the copies of such materials are taken to the

Conmittee's offices, the Bureau shall, within 24 hours of the

selection, make appropriate excisions and pacaphrases of infor

mation which might, if inadvertently disclosed, endanger sensitive

or sensitive

FBI. sources and/ongoing operations.

(b) If the Task Force Leader has any objections to the excisions

on paraphrases, the materials in issue will be forthwith conveyed by

¿re Buitaü, with a irrinion statement of ito grounds for its nositim,

to the Special Counsel who shall resolve the matter by negotiation

within 24 hours.

(c) In the event the matter is not resolved within 24 hours, the

Special Counsel shall submit the matter forthwith to the Attorney

General who shall notify the Chairman forthwith and arrange for an

appropriate disposition.

(7) The Conmittee staff may remove to the office of SSC for appropriate

use, any notes which they may make upon review of material screened by

the FBI, as provided in (6) above, without such notes being reviewed

by the Bureau. The Committee staff may remove notes on unscreened

materials only if such notes are reviewed and cleared by the Bureau

under the provisions of (6) (a) thru (c) above.

L NW 65360-Docld:32989627 Page 112

---

## Page 118

- 5-

(8) The staff and the members of the Committee may examine the

original materials to which the staff has been given access as

extensively as necessary, in the Hoover Building at Room 4171,

during normal FBI business hours; upon reasonable notice, special

arrangements may be made for access at other times.

(9) These procedures are adopted subject to satisfactory experience

in implementation. If after a fair trial the procedures herein do

not operate suitably in the view of either the SSC or the Attorey

General, the procedures may be unilaterally set aside by either the

SSC or the Attorney General and other appropriate and suitable

methods of procedure undertaken.

NW 65360 Docid:32989627. Page 118

---

## Page 119

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR 141 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

/

TO

: Mr. J. B. Adams

DATE: 7-24-75

FROM

: Legal Counsel

SUBJECT: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Assoc. Dir

Dep. ADPAd

Dep. ADAn

Asstadir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.-

Ext. Affairs -

Filos & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection -

Intell. -?

Legal Count e/

Plan. & Evalit

Spec. Inv.

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth in

summary form the requests we have received from various Committees

in Congress and the status of our replies.

OSenate Seject Committee

'On Intelligence Activities (Church's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 5-14-75

Includes among other things

information concerning wire-

taps, including thei recon-

struction of Bureau files, as

Status

Responses to most

questions prepared,

approved, and

delivered.

well as Inspection surveys

for ten offices.

Letter, 6-27-75

Request for information

concerning alleged abuses.

Department seeking?

clarification.

Letter, 6-30-75,

received by Bureau

7-8-75.

Letter, 7-3-75

Request pertaining to

COINTELPRO.

Response being

prepared.

UNRECORDED COPY FLED W

1 - Mr. Wannall

(Attn: Mr. Cregar)

1 - Mrs. Metcalf

Requests documents pertaining

to COINTELPRO be furnished

Response being

prepared.

to the Committee in Committee

space.

6246215827

REC- 102

1 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr5 Hotis 30 1975

1 - Mr. Daly

CONTINUED - OVER

PVD;bjc, (7)

11'

1. 8 197s

NW 65360o-Hlocld:32989627 Page 119

Buy U,S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 120

:

".

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter, 7-8-75

Communication to all employees Response being

concerning Senate Select

prepared.

Committee inquiries.

Letter, 7-14-75

Request concerning two

Response being

highly sensitive Bureau programs prepared.

in the foreign intelligence field.

Letter, 7-14-75

Request concerning

COINTELPRO documents.

Letter, 7-14-75

Material pertaining to

Martin Luther King.

Letter, 7-14-75

Material pertaining to

Ku Klux Klan.

Letter, 7-23-75

List of people interviewed

in O&C Inspection Review.

Response being

prepared.

Response being

prepared.

Response being

prepared.

Response being

prepared.

Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights House Judiciary

Committee (Edwards Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 7-9-75

Requested information

concerning surreptitious

Status

Response being

prepared.

entry.

Letter, 7-15-75

Requested information

pertaining to our assignment

Response being

prepared.

of Bureau personnel to

Congressional Committees.

- 2 -

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 120

---

## Page 121

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Hearings

Nature of Request

Request to arrange testimony

before Subcommittee on Postal

Facilities, Mail, and Labor

Management of the Post Office

and Civil Service Committee

concerning mail covers and mail

openings.

Status

Date of testimony

has not been established.

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

so jot pus

PLM

goo

-3 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 121

---

## Page 122

OPTIONAL FORM SIO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

FROM

: Mr. J. B. Adams

: Legal Counsel q

Assoc.' Dir.

Bop. 194191

"Dep.

Isst. Dir

Admin.:

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

DATE: 7-16-75

Files & Com. -

MARIG

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

19o00

SUBJECT: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Legal Cour

Plan. & Eval

Spec. Inv.

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y _

The purpose of this memorandum is to set forth in

summary form the requests we have received from various Committees

in Congress and the status of our replies.

Senate Select Committee

On Intelligence Activities (Church's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Status

Letter, 5-14-75

Includes among other things

information concerning wire-

taps, including their recon-

struction of Bureau files, as

Responses to most

questions prepared,

approved, and

delivered.

well as Inspection surveys

for ten offices.

Letter, 5-28-75

Requests certain Senators

on Committee be given

access to any information

concerning them in FBI files.

Being handled under

same guidelines as

Freedom of Information

Act requests. Letter

Committee from

Department requesting

discussion be held.

Letter, 6-13-75

Requests complete informa-

Material being

tion concerning mail openings

and mail covers.

-ILC

gathered for response.

REG- 102

Letter, 6-27-75

Request for information

JUL 30 1975

concerning alleged abuses.

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Mintz

(Attn: Mr. Cregar)

1 - Mr. Hotis

1 - Mrs. Metcalf

1 - Mr. Dalysi

PVD:kjs (7)

CONTINUED - OVER

84 4 1 9 1975

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

NW 65360-Docld:32989627 Page 122

---

## Page 123

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Letter, 6-30-75,

Request pertaining to

received by Bureau

COINTELPRO.

7-8-75.

Letter, 7-9-75

Status

Response being

prepared.

Letter, 7-3-75

Letter, 7-8-75

Letter, 7-14-75

Letter, 7-14-75

Letter, 7-14-75

Letter 7-14-75

Request briefing for

Committee Members con-

cerning documents in

possession of Committee

which may be highly

sensitive. Documents were

furnished by White House and

were material studied by

Rockefeller Commission.

Requests documents pertaining

to COINTELPRO be furnished

Response being

prepared.

to the Committee in Committee

space.

Communication to all employees Response being

concerning Senate Select

prepared.

Committee inquiries.

Request concerning two

Response being

highly sensitive Bureau programs prepared.

in the foreign intelligence field.

Request concerning

COINTELPRO documents.

Material pertaining to

Martin Luther King.

Material pertaining to

Ku Klux Klan.

Response being

prepared.

Response being

prepared.

Response being

prepared.

- 2 -

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 123

---

## Page 124

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams

RE: STATUS OF RESPONSES TO CONGRESSIONAL

COMMITTEE REQUESTS

Subcommittee on Government Information and Individual Rights

(Abzug's Committee)

Date of Request

Nature of Request

Request asking for identity

of FBI personnel who served

on Interagency Evaluation

Committee between 1970 and

1973.

Status

We have responded.

Hearings

Request to arrange testimony

before Subcommittee on Postal

Facilities, Mail, and Labor

Management of the Post Office

and Civil Service Committee

concerning mail covers and mail

openings.

Date of testimony

has not been established.

It has been postponed

from 7-15-75 to

around 7-24-75.

RECOMMENDATION:

For informations

pur

- 3

-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 124

---

## Page 125

N

2 - Mr.

A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

CODE

TELETYPE

URGENT

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

IO/SAC ATLANTA

FROM DIRECTOR FBI (62-116395)

AUGUST 14, 1975

1 - Mr. W. A. Branigan

PERSONAL ATTENTION

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

SENSTÚDY / 75

1 - Mr.

L. F. Schwartz

NEW YORK OFFICE HAS ADVISED THAT FORMER SA JOHN G. WILLIS

WAS RECENTLY CONTACTED BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE (SSC) STAFF

MEMBER PATRICK SHEA WHO INTERVIEWED HIM RELATIVE TO HIS KNOWL-

EDGE OF FORMER BUREAU SOURCE SAM JAFFE WHO ALLEGEDLY HAS BEEN

IN CONTACT WITH SSC. JAFFE ALLEGEDLY ADVISED SSC THAT HE

FORMERLY ENJOYED A PLEASANT RELATIONSHIP WITH FORMER SA WILLIS

AND FORMER SA EDWARD F. GAMBER WITH REGARD TO SOVIET INTELLI-

00/52/01:

GENCE: MATTERS. JAFFE ALLEGEDLY STATED TO SSC THAT BUREAU

PERSONNEL BECAME COOL TOWARD HIM IN APPROXIMATELY 1966-1968

AFTER JAFFE RETURNED FROM HONG KONG AND THAT SINCE THAT TIME

JAFFE HAS BEEN UNABLE JO HOLD A JOS AND BELIEVES, THAT THE TBE

IS BEING VINDICTIVE TOWARD HIM EX-DES DREESVING HEM OF A MANS

OF MAKING A LIVELIHOOD.

HO AUG 15 1975

IF'S: 1hb

(fÒ)

SEE NOTE PAGE 3

Assoc. Dir. —

Dep. AD Adm...

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.

Ident..

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv.

Training

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

184.

TELETYPE

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

MAT, ROOM

TELETYPE UNIT

NO 643dU Goeld.32989627 Page 125

1 - 67-456921 (Personnel File Former SA Edward F. Gamber)

'= 67-66250 (Personnel File Former SA John G. Willis)

GP( 954-546

---

## Page 126

PAGE THO

62-116395

• FORMER SA WILLIS ADVISED THAT HE TOLD SHRA THAT HE

KNEW NOTHING OF THE FBI'S ATTITUDE TOWARD JAFFE AFTER 1964,

SINCE HE RETIRED FROM THE BUREAU THAT YEAR. SHEA INDICATED

TO WILLIS THAT HE HAD NOI YET TALKED TO FORMER SA GAMBER

BUT MAY INTERVIEW HIM IN THE FUTURE.

FORMER SA GAMBER IS CURRENTLY EMPLOYED BY THE TELLS

FARGO ARMOREDCAR DIVISION AND RESIDES IN THE ATLANTA AREA.

YOU SHOULD IMMEDIATELY ATTEMPT TO CONTACT GAMBER AND ALORT

HIM THAT HE MAY BE APPROACHED FOR INTERVIEW BY SSC STAFF.

HE SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT IN THE EVENT HE IS INTERVIEIED

AND, DURING THE COURSE OF THE INTERVIEU, QUESTIONS ARE ASKED

WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPFRATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS,

TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS),

HE MAY REQUEST AIT FBI ACINT TO BE AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION.

BUREAU WILI, PROVIDE AGENT IF REQUESTED. AS A PRELUDE TO

INTERVIET, THE FORMER IMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED BY

SSC STAFF, CONTACI BUREAU'S LEGAL, COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT

CALL FOR FULI INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING HIS

OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 126

---

## Page 127

PAGE THREE

62-116395

FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS IMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF

ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS

COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND IO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFOR-

MATION. CONTACT WITH FORMER SA GAMBER SHOULD BE HANDLED

PERSONALLY BY SAC OR ASAG, OR IF THIS IS NOI FEASIBLE BY A

SENIOR SPECIAL AGENT OF YOUR OFFICE.

SUTEL RESULTS OF CONTACT WITH GAMBER AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

IN ABOVE CAPTION. IF HE IS NO LONGER LOCATED IN YOUR

TERRITORY OR TEMPORARILY AWAY, SET OUT LEAD TO RESPONSIBLE

OFFICE WITH COPY TO BUREAU.

NOTE:

Jaffe is a former Bureau source who is currently

engaged in a Freedon of Information Act request appeal.

Appropriate files are being reviewed to deternine that, if

any, significance there may be in the allegations atcribute

to Jaffe by the SSC Staff Member.

Procerure for alerting

former Sa Gamber is in accordance with what me have been

doing concerning many other former employees.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 127

---

## Page 128

& 5-113₴ (Rev. 3-21-73)

stis

10110100 MORIG

SECRET

DECLASSAY ON: 27Y

CLASCIFIED BY SP2 ALM 166

Intelligence Division

LE INTORMAPION CONTAT

STONE OTH

INFORMATIVE NOTE

Date —

8/4/75

In connection with our responses to

the Senate Select Committee (SSC), the

White House has instructed that the Intel-

ligence Community prepare a briefing for

Senators Church and Tower of the SSC

regarding warrantless electronic surveil

lances and surreptitious entries. During

meetings of the Intelligence Community, it

was agreed that NSA, FBI and CIA would give

the briefings. No date has been scheduled

for the briefings, although it is antici-

pated representatives of the White House

will monitor a preview of the actual brief-

ing to be given Senators Church and Tower.

During meetings of the Intelligence

Community representatives, to discuss the

contents of such a briefing, it was agreed

among representatives of NSA, CIA and FBI

that erforts would be made to avoid identi-

fying specific foreign targets of surrepti-

tious entries or warrantless electronic

surveillances.

Attached is a memorandum from CIA

advising that CIA has already disseminated

to the SSC information concerning

• sensitive

technical operations against certain

Embassies and diplomatic establishments in

the U.s.

ACTION:

WOC : bcw

wor information and record purposes

SECRET

Classied by e28 us

Exempt trom

GDS, Category. /7=

Date of Declas itication Indetinite

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 128

Per

---

## Page 129

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

:

Mr. J. B.

Adams

DATE:

8/6/75

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

epaAD Ins

sst. Dir.

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs —

Filos & Com. -

Gen. Inv. —

FROM : Legal Counsel

Đật:

SUBJECT: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

-aboratory

egal Court

mDR16

Plan. & Eva

Spec. Inv.

10-10-00 SPZALn1 .sd.oaEn=

-=

On 8/6/75, Daniel M. (Mac) Armstrong, III, who was

on the personal staff of former Acting Director Gray, called to advise

DALE

that he had been contacted by John Elliff. He had known Elliff casually

during the confirmation hearings regarding Mr. Gray. Elliff told him

that he was personally interested in determining background on two matter

which were: (1) the decision to abolish the Crime Records Division; and

(2) the Legal Attache program.

Armstrong told him that he had no knowledge concerning the

Crime Records Division and had not even learned of its abolishment until

after the fact. Armstrong referred Elliff to Dave Kinley regarding that

topic. Armstrong said that Elliff did not want to talk to him concerning the

Legal Attache program over the phone and said he would contact him in the

near future for an appointment to see him personally.

Armstrong said he was passing this information along to us in

order to keep us advised of his contacts with the Senate Select Committee

concerning his Bureau information which came to him as a result of his

Bureau employment.

REC2602 12523÷024

RECOMMENDATION:

EX. 101

LO AUG 15 1975

For information.

279139

PLea

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Hotis

1 - Mr. Mintz

1 - Mr. Herington

JH:mfd

(6)

5t0s6

8 411

tie 2 6 1975

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

NW 65360-, Docld:32989627

Page 129

---

## Page 130

SENSITIVE

BARMIN IS UNCLACKIE

BAILINGO BY SPALMISTE

DivD-75/327

4 August 1975

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:

Senate Seléct Committee Staff Knowledge

of CIA Domestic Electronic Surveillance

Against Foreign Targets

Assoc. Dir..

Dep. AD

Dep.

AD

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection

Intell. V unu

Laboratory

Legal Coun.

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

1. In our discussions preparatory to the briefing to

be given

to Senators Church and Tower, we have agreed to try

to avoid identifying specific foreign targets of the various

types of operations which will be discussed,

although it was

generally recognized that it would be impossible to avoid

discussing the soviet target specitically. I have recently

Learned that the SSC Staff is aware of the fact (from material

turned over to them by CIA) that CIA "participated in a series

of electronic surveillance operations in the U.S."

The infor-

mation is contained in a single paragraph, which goes on to

say:

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

2.

This being so, it can be expected that the Staff will

have brought this information to the senators' attention, and

I will be prepared to respond factually to questions with re-

spect to these operations, which of course were carried out in

pursuit of NSA requirements, and

support.

EX-101

with FBI coordination and

REC-26 62-116

-523

3.

Notwithstanding this regrettable breach in the patAUG 15 1975

ciple we have agreed to try to maintain. I believe we shopid

resist pressures to expand on the number of identified

targets

, a made fur

Temporar

use of

destruction

8/4/25°CC: NSA*

(Mr. Richard Kern)

FBI (Mr.

WillIam Cregar

IC Statt (Adm. Showers

RW65368 B081d97589627 Page 130

Edward

Ryan

Chief, Division

5-Eut

SENSITIVE

62-116395

---

## Page 131

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

5010-106

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN, REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

Mr. McDermot

FROM

: W

I. Bailey?

DATE: 7831-75

COMMODE SPEAL.216

Assoc. Dir. _

Dep. AD Adm. _

ADap. AD Inv. _

Asst, Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affoirs -

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. -

Ident..

SUBS

;CT

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. _

Spec. Inv. -

SENSTUDY - 75

On July 31, 1975, Mr. Dan Dwyer, Research Assistant,

Senate Select Committee, advised SA Seymor F'. Phillips that he

had some specific questions to ask concerning his review of the

Classifying Guide, Files and Communications Division.

Thereafter,

'Supervisor Paul F" Shea and Classifying Unit Supervisor Odell

Wheeler answered the following questions raised by Mr. Dwyer:

(1) Explain the difference in applicant mail categories, i.e.

07, 77, 116g 151 and 161?

The various applicant type categories

were discussed with him.

(2) What is the difference

between

main fIles, general files and setup files? These definitions were

given to him in accordance with the manual; in adaition, our pro-

Director Sec'y -

MICHAE

MYCO LEMOHS

COKENSS; ONE SI

"00" files

and subfiles

cedures for hen when is a 6l file interchengeable? It was explained.

explained.

to him that the 62 classification is interchangeable with other

designated classifications, for example, that incoming oz material

could be placed in an existing file on the subject rather than

opening a separate 62 file. (4) Describe what you mean by the

standard sublist.

It was explained that a subnumber is assigned

to each one of our field offices and to each foreign country; that

subfiles are used when it is anticipated that the volume of mail

will be sufficient to place the file in separate subs for futurel

ready reference to a particular area or locality. (5) Whati

the meaning of the character of a case?

have utilized 185 classification numbers to date and that each of

these classifications has a corresponding character.

given was the 26 classification and corresponding ITSMV character.

(S)

(6) What is meant by the 134 classification being interchangeable

with the

subveesive list?

It was explained to him that from the

185 classifications approximately 60 of these are termed subversive

from an administrative standpoint.

The 134 classification which

designates a (security informant is interchangeable with certain

subversive classifications on the subversive list.

(s)

(S)

Bureau file 62-116395

1 - Mr. Mintz

- Mr. Wannall

EX- 7(1:

REC-26

02711

1

95-522

- Mr. Cregar

1

- S. F. Phillips

PFS :mks?'

SO AUG 15 1975

(6)

CONTINUED - OVER

_AUG 1 8 1975

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 131

---

## Page 132

The Aftorney Genoral

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTER

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

— Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

August 7, 1975

1

- Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Ir. T. J. McNifi

#MDR16

•SP-2 ALM/7.TG

10: 10-00

This is in response to an oral request fron

lir. Loch Johnson, Senate Select Cormittee Staff Houber,

that tvo former FDI Spocial Agent enployces be made

available for intorview and/or their current addrosses

be made available to the Senate Select Committee so that

the Cormittoe may arrange for the intervious.

Attached for your approval and tomarding to

the Connittoo is the original of a comorandun responsivo

¿o the above request. A copy of this nonoranoum is boing

provided for your records.

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

REC-26

I ~ The Doputy Altornoy Coneral

Attention:

Michael &. Shahcen

Spocial Counsel for

Intolligence Coordination

62-119912-521

FQ AUG 15 1975

1 - 67-419472

- 67-431020

r."}

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

(12)

-S ENCLOSURE

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp.Syst.com

Ext. Affairs ..

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. _

Ident. -

inspection

Intell..

Laboratory

щобір

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun.

15.p.m

'elephone Rm

W360 Doc A 208962M

Page 135E LETYPE UNIT O

gli:

GPO 954-545

---

## Page 133

62-116395

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W.

R. Wannall

- Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. T. J. McNiff

August

7, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECI COMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNHENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

SEZ ALM/ITE

1E: ADDRESSES-OF-FORLE

BUREAU EMPLOYEE

On July 28, 1975, Mr. Loch Johnson, Senate Select

Committee Staff Hember, orally requested of Special Agent

Paul V. Daly,

FBI Headquarters, that forner FBI Special Agents

Thomas J. Smith and Richard D. Cotter be made available for

interview and/or their current addresses be made available

to the Senate Select Connittee so that intervicws nay bo

arranged.

The subject matter of the intervicw is to be linited

to the above former employees' knowledge concerning the

"Huston Plan."

This is to advise that both lessrs. Smith and Cotter

have been released from their employment agreenent with this

Eureau for the purpose of an interview by the Senate Select

Committee concerning their knowledge of the "Huston Plan."

In response to Mr. Johnson's request, there is set forth below

the last known address for cach of the above-naned forner

employees:

Thomas J. Smith, 3410 Memphis Lane, Bowie, Maryland

20715.

Virginia

Richard D. Cotter, 5337 Ravensworth Road, Springfield,

22151°

1 - The Attorney General

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. - 1 - 67-449472

Asst. Dir.:

1 - 67-431020

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

Isant li

Files & Com. -

(11)

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection _

OFIGINAL AND ONE TO THE

Intell.

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Laboratory-

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

MAIL ROOM L

TELETYPE UNIT

NW 65360 Docld: 32989627 Page 133

SEE NOTE PAGE 2

TIM

TENCROSURE

12

GPO 954-546

---

## Page 134

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

NOTE:

Reference is made to Legal Counsel memorandum to

J. B. Adams, dated 7/29/75,

captioned "Senstudy 75," wherein

the request of Hir. Johnson is set forth as well as the approved

release of Messrs. Smith and Cotter from their employment

agreement as it relates

; to the "Huston Plan." On 8/4/75

Special Agent Thomas J. lchiff attempted to contact Mr. Smith

at his home phone 301-262-1921. An adult female answered and

advised that she was baby-sitting for Mr. and lirs. Smith who

are currently in New Mexico and are not expected to return

for an additional two weeks. Special Agent chiff left his

nare and office phone numbor with the request that Mr. Smith

call him upon his return to his residence.

Mr. Richard Cotter on 8/4/75 was contacted at his

home residence phone 256-7227 and advised of the SSC desire

to interview him within the parameter outlined above. Mr. Cotter

was advised that he has been released fron his employment

agrecment withinthe above parameter and that should he so request

a Bureau Agent will ko made available to hin for consultation

at the time of the interview.

It was pointed out to Mr. Cotter

that during the interview there are certain privileged areas

concerning which he would not be required to answer questions,

namely:

intormation which might divulge the identities or fbI

sources; information relating to sensitive nethods and techniques;

information which might adversely affect on-going FBI investigations

and information which originated with other agencies, including

foreign intelligence agencies.

Mr. Cotter concluded

by saying

that upon being contacted by the SSC he would advise this Bureau

of the date of the anticipated interview and his decision as to

whether or not he would request that a Bureau Agent be made

available for consultation.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 134

---

## Page 135

pay....

F-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

OLTR

LALHM

_ Memo

• Report dated -

8/7/75

ciphoned states Senate Select Conmittee. Re:

Addresses of Former Bureau

Employees. (7/28/75 request)

FBI

Originating Office:

Delivered by:

Girsper

_ Date:

5/8/25

Received by:

Title: -

Counsel

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

#MDR16

ALL INPORMATTON CONTATION

ENCLOSURE

62-116395-5:1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 135

---

## Page 136

=

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FBE

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

not!! a document was made available

I DOCUMENT I

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW |

I TESTIMONY

JOTHER

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

2. DATE PROVIDED

8/7/75

SSC

HSC

1. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents;

five name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Memorandun

number if in response to formal request, other.

6.

CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C. S,

TS or

Codeword)

7/28/75 oral request

7. KEy "unde find For empresopriato koy words from the list provided soparatoly:

if key words not listed are

Intelligence collection

n:5:10-10-00

SPJALmITG

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Furnishing SSC addresses of forner Special Agents: to

be Interviewed concerning thely knowledge of the

"Euston Plan,"

62-116395

(INK; FMK)

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO CENTRAL COMMINITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

379| (6-75)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 136

TREAT AS YELLOW

CLASSIFYLAS ARPROPRIATE

+2 416375-521

---

## Page 137

INSTRUCtIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters it appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 137

---

## Page 138

The Attorney General

"F-

Director, FBI REC-26

india

•PROPOSED PROCEDURES -

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

July 22, 1975

111=553-5.20

I have reviewed the proposed procedures as set

forth in memorandum to you from Mir. K. William O'Connor

dated July 21, 1975, and I will abide by your judgment in this

matter. To clarity our position relative to raw files, I

strongly recommend you incorporate in your transmittal

letter a reference to this.

I - The Deputy Attorney General

1 - Mr. Mintz (détached)

JBA:ams

(6)

Depice trig

7122/75-3P

righ

Assoc. Dir. _

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. _

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com..

Gen. Inv.

Ident. .

Inspection.

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. _

lephone Rm. -

Kih SAG G10642980621 Page 13,8

TELETYPE UNIT L

..:10-10:00

---

## Page 139

8 re

J. B. AD

DEPUTY

ASSOCIA

RECTOR

FMDRIG

ATI INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCIASSIFIED

DATE 10l1O/00 BYSP 7 ALm/7

7/22/75

TO MR. KELLEY:

The attached constitutes the revised draft

of proposed procedures which we met on yesterday

with the Attorney General and staff. Mr. Mintz and

I feel it incorporates the matters agreed upon at the

meeting.

Please note the memo to Mir. Levi from

O'Connor indicates these procedures are designed

"to permit broad access for SSC staff to FBI

materials," and the proposed procedures do not rule

out the possibility that the Committee can request

complete files for review. Accordingly, if you have

no objection, we will advise the Attorney General

that you have reviewed the proposed procedures and

will abide by his judgment, however, we continue to

object to granting of access to raw files of the FBI

to representatives of the SSC. Attached is a letter

to the AG so stating.

LA-LOTREC26 62-116395-

17. 0H5-24*1975

ENCLOSURE

Enclosures

seriptire last e

fre-

LEGAL GUNSEL

---

## Page 140

15

mak.

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL*

WASHINGTON, DICE 20530

July 21, 1975

TO:

FROM:

Edward H. Levi

Attorney General

K. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for Intelligence

Coordination

SUBJECT: Proposed Procedures - SSC

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm.

Dep. AD Inv

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. *

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

-egal Cou

lan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

ATG

SA-zALM

This draft of "Proposed Procedunes" has not been discussed

with SSC staff.

It is intended to reflect the substance of the

discussion had on 7/21, in your office; and incorporates (as

undersoored) additional language for the purposes suggested by

that discussion. Also reflected are the slight editorial changes

requested by the SSC in the draft attached to Senator Church's

letter of July 18, 1975.

These pioceumes are designeù to paindi tinãù aucess foi

SSC staff to FBI materials at the FBI, or delivery of such materialss

II approphiate, to the sul. the present scope oi the access is

defined by the requests as received; those extant are the subject

of superseding redraft under paragraph 1.

The prospective scope of

requested information is not restricted, but is subject to negoriation

as indicated in the amendment to paragraph 1.

The proposed modification of paragraph 3 will be the focus of

most controversy. the sol willa probably object to the withholding

of sourres under paragraph 3(d) (proposed) saying that accass to

of to controversy:

information at the FBI offices is all that is required; that no

note on such documents can be removed from the premises of the FBI

under procedure b; and that it they wish to pursue any sources,

the anpeal provision of existing paragraph 6 should cover it.

Since that was the purpose of paragraph 6, and since paragraph 6(a)

was designed to focus on any real problem which might arise, the

scope of the stated problem under paragraph 3(d) may be seen by the

SSC as an attempt to withhold information from the SSC staff, and

delay the inquiry (since the Bureau would have to do considerable pra

ENCLOSURE

I ENCLOSURE

CC:

Deputy Attorney General

REC26 62114395-556

Directos, FBI

EX-101

E3 XUL 24-1975

Mr. Scalia

Doug Marvin

80533539638

1778-1988

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 140

LEGAL COUNSEL

---

## Page 141

- 2

delivery work under 3(d) to make properly defined and reviewed

deletions). Accordingly, I would expect SSC to assert (a) DOJ

does not trust SSC probity or security, and (b) DOJ is following

a dilatory and unnecessary tactic.

In anticipation of these problems, I have re-written

paragraph o to permit unilateral abrogation if the procedures

do not work. If actual infornation withheld is. capriciously

defined, on if any lapse of good judgment occurs, I would expect

prompt abrogation by SSC and a very severe criticism of the

. Director, the Attorney General, and the Department.

I think that is a high risk, and assumption of it places

a very heavy burden upon the Bureau, initially, and upon the

Department, ultimately.

My recommendation is that the proposed procedures be

attempted as redrafted, subject to Attorney General and White

House approval; but a vigorous caveat is indicated as to the

need for real restraint in the exercise of initial FBI discretion

under paragraph 3(d) .

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 141

---

## Page 142

sa nate ..

9/70 h.

PROPOSED PROCEDURES

(1) The Domestic Task Force Leader will submit periodically a list

oi specific materials, relevant to the inquiry being conducted under

S.R. 2L, to which the Conmittee staff wishes access or of which the

Cormittee desires delivery. Any questions as to the scope or meaning

of any portion of such list shall be identified by the Special Counsel

and discussed at the time of acceptance of the list, between the DIFL

and the Special. Counsel.

The first such list will be delivered to the Department of

Justice within 48 hours of the adoption of this procedure, and will

summarize and supersede all the presently outstanding requests; this

list will be in priority order, as fixed by the Cormittee, with fixed

delivery/access dates specified. Those materials for which the Com

mittee requests delivery or access shall be delivered to the Cormittee

or made accessible in Room 4171 of the Hoover Building not later than

within 18 96 hours of the date specified. The Cormittee Chairman and

Vice Chairman shall be informed by the Attorney General, within 24 hours

of receipt of the request, of any delay beyond 48 96 hours, the expected

length of the delay, and the specific reasons for the delay. Partial

access or delivery shall be proffered, by the Bureau of/to any materials

requested, while the balance of such materials are being prepared. A

partial proffer shall not extend the time of full response set forth

herein.

* Wherever used herein, the term Domestic Task Force Leader (DIEL)

is understood to include the Chief Counsel and the Minority Counsel

of the Senate Select Committee:

ENCLOSURE

62-116395=580

• NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 142

---

## Page 143

- 2 -

"."

The Attorney General may exempt specific topical areas of

inquiry from the scope of these procedures. Such topical areas

shall be identified by the Attorney General to the Chairman and

Vice Chairman by letter upon consideration of the lists submitted

pursuant to this provision. As to any such exemption, the proce-

dure to be followed shall be proposed, defined, adopted, and

followed after consideration by the SSC of the specific exemption,

and pertinent inquiry and discussion at the staff level.

(2) The following procedures shall apply (a) where delivery of

materials requested might jeopardize FBI sensitive sources or

ongoing operations, or (b) where the Domestic Task Force Leader

requests access to materials, rather than delivery to the SSC.

(3) The Department will furnish access at the Hoover Building in

Room 4171 to those materials requested:

(a) only to the merbers of the Committee, where it is deter

mined by the Attorney General that the materials involve peculiarly

sensitive foreign intelligence sources or sensitive ongoing operations.

(b) In all other cases, to the appropriately cleared staff who

will have access to all of the materials.

(c) An exception to (a) and (b) above is made for the identities

of so-called "live" informants or potential informants as defined in

the FBI Manual of Instructions as to which no access will be furnished

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 143

---

## Page 144

3

unless the identity of the individual as an informant or potential

informant has already been made known to the Committee, or unless the

Attorney General, the Chairman and Vice Chairman, jointly agree on the

limited disclosure of such identities to the Chairman and Vice Chairman.

(d) An exception to (a) and (b) above is made for information which

would identify persons, as sources, who have provided or continue to

provide information to the FBI, and as to whose identity the FBI has

undertaken an obligation of confidentiality. In order to preserve

that obligation of confidentiality, the FBI will withhold access to

this class of information, unless the identity of the individual as

a source has already been made known to the comnittee, or unless the

Attorney General, the Chairman and Vice Chairman, jointly agree on

the limited disclosure of such identities to the Chairman and Vice

Chairman.

(4) Those materials to which the staff has access may be reviewed and

studied in Room 4171 of the Hoover Building and such notes may be

taken as deemed appropriate by the Staff.

(5) The Conmittee staff shall select from these materials to which

access is herein provided, those materials hhich it deems pertinent

to the Conmittee's inquiries and necessary for delivery to the

Committee's offices.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 144

---

## Page 145

JFK Law 10(a)1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 145

---

## Page 146

JFK

Law 10(a)1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 146

---

## Page 147

JFK Law 10(a) 1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 147

---

## Page 148

JFK Law 10(a)1

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 148

---

## Page 149

1

- - Мт.

J. B. Adams

1

- Mr.

J.

A. Mintz

- Mr. W.

R. Wannall

- Mr.

1

W.

0. Cregar

- Mr. S.

F. Phillips

August 7, 1975

T. S. SENATE SELECT COLMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERIMENTAT OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECI TO INTELLICENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE:

INTERVILM OF FORMER TOBI

SPECIAL AGENT (SA) JOHN M. =

MATTER

BY SSC STAFF MEMBERS

ALL

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE2-2381

2-23-81

Set out belov is information concerning an

interview of former FBI SA John M. Matter by SSC Stafr

Members.

resident of It. Myers, Florida.

on advance notice from Mr. Michael Losteln

SSo Staff Member, Matter traveled to Vashington, D. Ô-9

Irom his residence in Florida to be interviewed

11:30 a-1. July 2211975, 1n the sse offices.

Prior to appearing

was

for the interview, Matter

informed by the FBI that he was being released from

applicable euployment agreement Ior the purpose of

the

SSC interview which Epstein had indicated would concern

the forner Fi investigation of Martin luther kingt.

It was explained to Matter by the FBI that he had

right to counsel; however, the fBI was unable to provide

private counsel.

Matter was also told that there were

certain privileged areas concerning which he would not

be required to answer questions.

These areas concerned

sources; information relating to sensitive methods and

Assoc. Dir. —

techniques; information which might adversely affect

Dep. ADAm. - ongoing FBI investigations; and information which originated

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. _

-1 - 100-106670 (Martin Luther King, Jr.)

Ext. Affairs —1 - 67-72607 (Personnel file of former SA John M. Matter)

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

_SEP: eks (10) 0

Inspection -

Intell. -

Laboratory

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

SEE NOTE PAGE 13

Plon. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv..

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM [

TELETYPE UNIT L

62-116388510

ENCLOSURE!

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

NW 65360_ Docld:32989627 Page 149

---

## Page 150

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE:.

INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

with other agencies, including foreign intelligence agencies.

Matter was informed that if he desired the presence of an

FBI representative for consultation purposes, one would be

supplied on his request.

representative would not be present at the interview itself,

but would be located nearby and available for consultation

purposes.

Matter requested such assistance.

It was further explained to Matter by the FBI

that it a question arose during the interview in one of

The FBI representative accompanted Matter to the SSC

offices and made himself available as indicated above.

Set forth below is a statement which Matter

prepared and voluntarily furnished to the FBI which

reports the results of the interview of htm. Items under-

scored for emphasis or otherwise, and items placed in

quotation narks are as indicated by Matter in his preparation

of this statement:

Only a minimal number of typographical

and grammatical corrections were made by the FBI in the

reproduction of Matter'e statement.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 150

---

## Page 151

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC).

RE:

INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

STATEMENT OF JOHN M. MATTER

The following information is supplied as a result

of an Interview of former SA John M. Matter by SSe Staff

Members Michael Epstein (asked about 95% of the questions)

and Ms, Mary Debree (asked about 5% of the questions).

The information is presented according to subject matter and

not in the chronologleal order in which it was asked because

Epstein kept going back and picking up points that had been

discussed previously.

The interview began at 11:35 a,m. on Friday

July 25, 1975, and lasted until 5:40 p.m. with an hour out

for lunch and three 10 minute breaks.

It was held in a

small, acoustically-treated room (former projection beosh),

up one flight of stairs above room G-308, Dirksen Senate

orrice

Bullding.

Epstein advised that this was an interview

concerning the part. I had in the Bureau investigation of

Martin Luther King, Jr. (hereinafter MK). He did not advise

ne of my rights until I called his attention to the lack of

this about 5t00 p.m., at which time he told me all information

I gave was to be supplied voluntarily, that anything I said

could be the subject of further investigation by his Staff

and that. I could decline to answer any questions which I

did not feel were within the seope of the inquiry.

Epstein asked if I had discussed the MLK matter

with any bureau personnel this morning (July 25, 1975) - he sav

me come to G-308 with the FBI representative who was available

for consultation), and I stated I had discussed procedural

matters with SAs Paul Daly and Seymor Phillips, both of whom

had leaned over backyards to limit my discussion to procedural

matters and nothing else.

Epstela asked for and I supplied bäckgreund

Information as to my present address, when I entered on duty

in the Bureau, the field offices (FOs) where I had worked,

3

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 151

---

## Page 152

SENATE AZLECI COMMITTLE ON INIELLIGEICE ACTIVITIES (SSG)

when I was firat assigned to the Radio Inginsering Seetion

(heretnafter Re BIC), and how long I was In that seetion.

He asked how I rould descilbe uy particuler kind of work and

I told hin "recarity work" in the Security Unit 1a which I

ultimately becona Unit Chlaf.

He inquired if I was assigned

to other than the Re 800 and 1 advisad that when 1 f178t

raported on duty in the labazatory la 1944, It vas Bhe

Ilectrical Section, but that about tre of thies yeare later

that

Sestion was netzed with the ke 95C. He asked and ras

told that the Chief of the Re $IC at the tlue was I. M. Concad,

who later became Assistant Director of the laboratory.

After about 10 minutes, ipstell started to question

ne as to that Unlts axisted ln the Re SEC, what type of work

was dens ln the Unize and who Has worklog with me 10 my. Valt,

explaining that ho has trying to get an toon of hoy the Re fiC

ras sat up ace thare an imvastigation of Mld-type dould fit

into that section.

I asked for and uas gracted permiation to

soe the PAl enamltation representative uno nacompanied no,

When advised by nie of this Ilne of quastioning, the

representative told ne to supply such infoznation as to the

Ne BEC's Jet-Up and the nano of

any Agents ta my Unte.

Ori

returning to the intervier, Sparala then preduced an FBI

orsanizational chart fron the position of DATeCtOI on doma

throughithe indiriduel units in the meetlors under each

division

• Be callod uy attention to the

He SIC and the Units listed theraunder, all of which deale

vith badlo natters except one which was listod as "Ividence

Zxaatnatlons."

I advised him that my sork fell into the latter

and that all other units Ilsted had to do vith sona phase of

zadio communications uned throighout. the surens, I furninbed

his at his requent the followiny names of persons sio bad

worked with no in "rosurity natters" during 1960 te 1960,

which he naned is the porled in which he was Interested:

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 152

---

## Page 153

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

Wilbur G. Stevens, Robert A. Miller, WilliemE: Harward;

and William D. Campbell:

I stated that there may have been

others whose nanes I could not recall or who did not fit

into the time period he mentioned. He asked and I advised

that during thet pertod, Richard I. Millea was Seetion Chief

and Arthur J. Baker was his Number One Man:

Epstein and Dires specifically naned the following

persons and asked if they were connected in any way with the

MCk Investigation: Pfafuen, Meyo, Swartz, Bradley, Stevens,

and. Berley.

I advised that Robert F. Pfafman and George W.

Mayo had retired from the Re SEC about 1956 and 1958

respectively, Richard Swartz about 1968, Wayne Bradley about

1974,

Wilbur G.

Stevens was still in the Section, and

succeeded me as Unit Chief, that George Berley was in another

Section of the FBI Laboratory, end that to my personal

knowledge pone of the above had been conneeted with the MiK

investigation.

Ipstein specifieally asked whether "Don

Parsons" would heve been involved and I told him I had no

knowledge of such. He asked if I knew Farsons and I said

yes, he hed been a former Assistant Director of the FBI

Laboratory.

Epstein and Dereo questioned me at great length

as to how I got my assizmment in the MIK Investigation, who

authorized the

investigation, how long my work took, how

"the tapes" came into my possession, how I used "the tapes""

during uy work, what I did with "the tapes" after I was

finished with my assignment, and whether anyone else worked

with me on the assignmant

"they

(specifically asking me if I knew

#a Willian Campbell!'). They

also inquired what case supervisor

I dealt with in the Domestic Intelligence Division (herelnafter

DID) •

Some of these points were gone over by the

interrogators. tHo

or three times. I advised largely as follows

and qualified many of my answers as being "to the best of my

nemory,"

and in some instances I could not recall specific

details or names:

Nd 65360 Docld: 32989627 Page 153

---

## Page 154

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELZIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: • INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of Joha M. Matter

My assigment came orally fron Section Chief Millen

and quite possibly Assistant Director Conras 15 a conferenee

of the three of us la which I was advised that a Ion Seeret

investigation of ll had been authorized by the then.

Netotney General (AG) Robert I, Kennedy to determine if any

attempt wes being mnde by the Communist Party (CP) to

infiltrate Mul's organization and use tt to serve the Party's

purposes

This partieslarly related to at least one highly

placed hit staff menber (whosa nane I do not recollect) whe

had been assoedated with Cr netivities in the past. I sas

told that I was to render all technleal assistance thet ves

required de

i keeping

with aay roquests made by then DiD

Assistant Director,

Willien G, Bullivan, or DID case superviser

hancling the investigation.

Some tapes fren the Ad-authorized

MR Installationa would be received by me, and I vas to prepare

a compostte tape of any dezozatory infornation in those tapes.

"lullan Gampbell of the Washington Field Offlee (MEO) was to

work with me and

was to be primerily responsible for preparing

• BranscripE of the VIO tapes, uhile piapolating for me any

infernation that night be of valse for the composite.

and I set up the neccasaty traascription and filtering

eguipment for him ln the stullo and control toon parts

JFK Law 10(a)1

Room 7318 1n the Justice Bullding (JD), At seme point

additional tapes were received fron authorized MlK Installations

I WOULd BaVE

recall whether ady of the tapes pere isceived directly

by the Ke SEC, from the Inst three YOs, but was of the

opinion that they were most likely received fren the DID

supervisor those nne I could not speciflently recall.

I was asked speeifically if that case supervisor's neme

Gase

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 154

---

## Page 155

SENATE SELECT COMMITIES ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES. (SSC)

RE: . INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

was "Ryan," "Seynor Phillips," "Esank Baumgardner, " oF

"Lish Whitson.!

I replied that I did not know a Ryan, and

that Phillips, Fred (not Frank). Baumgardner and Lish Whitson

were possibilities but I could

not specifically recall whether

it was any one of them..

Epstein hammered on "who was. the

case superviser," but I could give him nothing more definite

than I had indieated.

It took me somewhere between one and two weeks to

complete my part of the assignment.

There were Inquiries.

from both my Section Chief and the DID as to progress..

There

were long hours put in by both Campball and myself to do an

accurate and reliable job as well as possible. No one else

was assignedrexcept us two because of the highly sensitive

nature of the material and its classification.

I did not

specifically recall if "working coples! were made immedlately

from the FO tapes, but most likely such was done since this

would eliminate the possibility of damaging the FO tapes during

transeription.

At the same time I would have been able to

monitor the FO tapes to gain fanillarity with the subjeet

matter and any sections which I might use for the composite

or were unintelligible.

• It is possible thet Campbell may have

monitored the tapes with me at the same time with a second

i ee hones bet could ge pete call it the

FO tapes onto a single reel.

The first part of the composite

would contain all the excerpts from one FO; the second part of

the composite, the excerpts fron another FO; and so on through

the third and

fourth parts. There possibly were gaps withtn

the excerpts to indicate discontimuity and possibly longer

gaps between the end of all excexpts from one tO and the start

of axcerpts from another FO.

To the best of my recollection, the final composite

did not contain splices between excerpts or between the fo

groups of excerpts. The composite was sterile (not traceable

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 155

---

## Page 156

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON. INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

to any source) as to the & inch recording tape itself, the

7 inch plastic reel containing the tepe, and the 7 inch box

containing. the reel. I do not recall whether it was a commercial

or a plain box. I estimate the total elapsed playing time of the

composite as being somewhere between 45 and 90 minutes, but

I could not recall the speeific time not the tape speed.

Epstein made quite a point of asking if the composite

had actually been put together as explained above, or whether

it was put together in the following manner: one of more

excerpts from one FO tape immediately foltowed by one of more

excerpts from another FO. tape,

and followed again by one of

more excerpts from a third or fourth FO tape.

It appeared that

he was trying to indicate that the composite had deliberately

been put together in such a manner as to create a false impression

as to where the excerpts had come from.

I stated that to the .

best of my memoty the composite had not been the target in that

manner and I categorically denied that any effort had been

made on my part to have the composite convey an idea other.

than that which was actually on the tape,

When the composite

was finished I made two of three coples of it which I identified

as "third generation tapes," while I considered the composite

a "second generation tape." I delivered the composite,

most

likely in the government routing envelope, to William C.

Sullivan in the JB, fifth floor office of then Assistent to

the Director Alan Belmont.

I recalled that this was on a

Saturday and Belmont was in his office with Sullivan.

Delivery was

made to Sullivan as a result of instructions I

had nost. likely obtained from Millen or Conrad who also told

me. to inquire of Sullivan if there was anything else he wanted

me to do, i

so inquired and Sullivan replied that there was

nothing further

and that he would take it fron there." I

could not recall if 1 delivered two or three copies of the

composite to Sulllvan at the same time of wheter they were

sent to him or the DID case supervisor by special messenger

the following Monday, Nor could I specifically recall if i

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 156

---

## Page 157

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGINCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M.. Matter

gave a composite copy to Campbell so that he could make a

transcription of it.

However, that was a possibility because

Campbell had the job of transcribing the WFO tapes and worked

at it up to 6 weeks or two months.

To the best of my recollection, Campbell retained the

WFO. tapes and I have no way of knowing whether I used all

WrO tapes or only those Campbell seleeted as being pertirent.

JFK Law 10(a)1

JFK Law 10(a)1

I do not recall the specifies, but the tapes from

were returned to the

DID case supervisor either when I had furnished my part of

the

investigation of after Campbell completed his work.

About

two years after that, I got a telephone call from the DID case

supervisor inquiring as to whether the Re SEC. still had the

tapes. I verlfied that he was the case supervisor and assured

him the

tapes had been

sent to the DID after the laboratory's work had been completed.

I have no specific knowledge as to what was to be

done with the composite or the copies thereof.

. The preparation

• in the sterile form of tape, reel and box was apparently done:

as a result of a specifio sequest made by. William C. Sullivan

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 157.

---

## Page 158

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

Rad:

INTERVIEN OF FORMER FBI SA BY §SC

Statement of John M. Matter

JFK Law 10(a)1

I supposed.

that bureau oiticlals had their own reason for requenting

a composite, but I was never told.

Epstein

sept pressing me with "didn't you thisk

this was strange?" and finally "what was your optaton?". To

the tormer I replied "not necessarily," and to the latter

sald a possible reason could have been that Bureau officials

wanted to give the composite to al hobart i Kennady to show

him the type of information being obtained so that he could

decide whether the surveillances he had authorized were to be

continued. I never discussed the "iLK tapes" with anyone

1n the Crimo Recorda Division.

I don't rule out the possibility

that some member of that Division may have anxed wiether 1 had

worked on the tapes, but i certainly had no discussion on the

subject matter:

I did not discuss the tapes with "Deke". Delorch

(spoctiteally named by losteta after he had asked me whether i

had discussed the tapes with anyone in the Crime recorde

Division).

Epstela asked if I had any knowledge of Ernie Belter

having anything to do with the Hik installation - WFO, aad I

told hin, "nose,"

He

appeared to be trying to find some sort of record

within the Bureau so that he could get names, dates and

assigaments.

In anoner to his inquiry, I stated that it was

quite likely I had received an "assignont slip" to account for

my time in the case.

I seriously douoted that such & 81ig

would bear the name of MlK but would mast

Ilkoly have identified

1t as a "special case" or the "MLK case:"

"I had no knowledge

of hon Campbell'a assignant was handled. A register is kept in

the Re SEC for personnel signing In and out, but this would only

show dates and times worked by me and other parsonnet, and

would not indicate what I was doing during & particular day

of 'period of time pertod." Campbell, being assigned to HIO, would

have signed in and out on the WO regioter, even though he vas

working for ailonger perfod of time in the

Re sic space.

10

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 158

---

## Page 159

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INIELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEN OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

I have no knowledge that a pbysical and/or photographic

surveillance of Mik was conducted by the Bureau:

I received no "letter of commendation" or

"meritorious raise" as a result of my work on the Mik ease.

Not was the latter specifically or otherwise mentioned in my last

efficiency report. Epstein was very specific in asking about

the letter of commendation, the meritorious raise and the

efficiency report.

He asked if I was aware in any way that the tape had

been furnished newsmen. I told him that I had a recollection

of reading an article in a newspaper or weekly news magazine

few mönths or a year of more after my assignment that MiK

tape information had been obtained by or furnished to newsmen.

I wondered at the time how they had been able to get the

Information. I also pointed out that within the last year of

two there have been a number of references by several featured

news columnists that MLK tape information had been leaked to

selected columnists.

I again denied that at the time

I delivered the cmposite to Sullivan that I had

any specific

knowledge of the use to which it was to be put.

Epstein and Debred did not ask if I had any further

information to furnish to them which had not been brought out

by questioning.

It was very apparent that they did not wish to

pursue the subject matter in a composite tape any further after

I stated that

Nor did they pursue

the interest of former AG Robert

I. Kennedy in the case after

his name was mentioned. Epstein wanted to know if it was

•YFK Law 10(a)1

apparent from the tapes that each

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 159°

---

## Page 160

SENATE SELECI COMMITIEE ON INTÉLLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

JEK Law 10(a) 1

Epstein gave me no explanation as to where he

obtained the names that he specifically mentioned to me. It

appeared to be his desire to conduct a thorough Interview and

to clear up confusion In his mind, possibly caused by conflicting

reports about the tapes. He and Debreo were courteous and

stayed well within the legitimate bounds of the MIK investigation

except as possibly indicated by his questions concerning the

makeup of the Re SEC and its Units.

While he did hot state it

specifically, as such, it appeared to me that he was trying to

determine how tape recordings resulting from microphone

surveillances were handled in a Section which dealt with radio

matters.

He seemed satisfied when I told him that the work of

my Unit came under the "Evidence Examinations" Unit. He also

accepted my explanation of "security work" with the comment that

such sensitive work

certainly was of a security nature. He

made no effort whatsoever to inquire

as to what further work

I may have done in the Section..

He specifically asked whether

I had given any MLK information to Stevens, and I replied that

while I could

not recall specifically, this was possible because

Stevens and I worked closely together and he would have had to

take over the case in my absence.

At a point near the end of the interview, Epstein

a Phil i person end tell Sal 1 repted,

"No." Epstein indicated doubt, to which I added that my

relations with all were purely official. Ipstein then asked if

I held any animosity toward' Sullivan.'" I answered, "No."

He then

inquired, "You don't have any?" Again I replied "No."

12

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 160

---

## Page 161

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

RE: INTERVIEW OF FORMER FBI SA BY SSC

Statement of John M. Matter

NOTE:

Briefing of Matter prior to interview was by

Supervisor P. V. Daly and by Supervisor S. F. Phillips of

INTD:

The latter accompanied Matter to the interview and

prepared this letterhead memorandum based upon a statement

which Matter dictated and had typed at FBIHQ on the day

following the interview.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 161.

13

-

---

## Page 162

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence. Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

If a document was made available

2. DATE PROVIDED

I DOCUMENT

BRIEFING

X INTERVIEW |

I TESTIMONY

OTHER

8/7/75

3. ТО WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

The Attorney General with acopy for forwarding

to the thite House

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Menorandu reporting results of on interview by SSC Staff

kienbers of former Special Agent of the FBI Jchn M.

Mattere

5. We spars to alise date an ame, morativo, ssposa, formal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C, S,

TS or

Codeword)

NA

U

?. Key "unde fenter to phasopriate koy words from

Surveillance, electronic

Orgonization and staffing

provided

separately; if key words not listed are

.l999 1yr 60

saliolos.

SP2 ALMITTG

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Former FBI investigation of Martin Iuther King, Jc.

62-116395

FMR: Enk

(4)

ORIGINAL, VIA LISISON TO CENIRAL COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS VELLOW

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379| (6-751

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 162

---

## Page 163

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted.

Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 163

---

## Page 164

SECRET

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

July 28, 1975

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. R. D. Hampton

AJI INFOPMATION CONTAINS

PERATE IS UNALASSTFIO RACETR

MONRE CROTC OIHERTISES.

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

1

Reference is made to a letter from the SSC dated

July 14, 1975, requesting certain documents and other information from

the FBI.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the Committee

is a memorandum containing a partial response to requests contained

in referenced letter, but which represents, in its entirety, our reply to

the Committee's inquiry concerning the nature of USCOPE. "A copy

of this memorandum is being provided for your records.

Enclosures

• (2)

62-116393

REC-26

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

42116325518

Attention: K. William O'Connor

ENCLOSURE

Special Counsel for

EX: AUG 1 4 1975

Intelligence Coordination

11918

itin

NOTE:

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com..

technique.

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection

Intell. .

Laboratory -

Plan. & Eval..

Spec. Inv.

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. _

Director Sec'

MAIL ROOM

3 4

_AUS 1 8 1975

NW

63360

Docld:32989627 Page 164

Referenced SSC letter requested information concerning

[SCOPE and ORKID,] Information concerning [ORKII will be handled by

CI-l and will be disseminated orally to the proper representatives of SSC.

(5)

Classified "Secret" to protect a sensitive investigative

TELETYPE UNIT

SECRET

Classified by 7005

from GDS,

lategory

amber 2

PAM

Date of eclassification Indes

ite

NATIONAL SECURIFY IFQIMATIONE

Unauthorized Disclosure

Subject to Criminal Sanctiong (P0 551-545

---

## Page 165

GECRET

G2-116895

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(I- Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Vir. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

July 28, 1075

1 - Mr. R. D. Hampton

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT CONDITICE

TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS

WITE RESPECT TO ITELIIGENCE ACTIVITIES (£5C)

#MDE 16 10/13/00

RE:

SCOPE

Reference is made to the letter from the captioned

Committee dated duy be, 1915, waich requested,

in part, that the

Committee be advised concerning the nature of SCOPE. (S)

SCOPE was the code word for a special channelizing

procecure whereby information received from an electronic surveillance

conducted by the FBI in the United States on a certain foreign diplomatic

establishment as well as selected foreign oificials fror that government

was disseminated to interested United Stateo Government sgencies.

The code name SCOTE indicated such information was to be handled in

3 most secure manner and escoos to it was to be restricted within these

egorcias to caly spocifically cosignated people. "This channel is 2o

longer baing utilized. (s)

1 - The Attorney General

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY TO AG

RDH:mjgny,

(8)

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin,

Comp. Syst..

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com..

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection.

Intell.

Laboratory -

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM I/

- NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 165

NATIONAL SECURITY INTORMATION

Unauthorized Disclesure

Subjec to Criminal Sanctions

port

Classifted bs 7405

"TELETYPE UNIT O

Category Nurber 2

Date of Declassitication

Indetinite

EnsIn: 62111-371-58

---

## Page 166

FRANK CIMISCH, PUSO, CHAIRIAN.

SOUFE: TUNEN "CINS" VICE CHAIRMAN

WHILIPA. JUST, MICH.

HOUSATIO M. RAKER, JAI,-TISNN-

MALTERF. MINDALE. MINN.

•LARRY CCLOWATIR., ARIZ.

WALTEND. IUD: E3102 KYO. • SHANLES MEG. MATMIAS, IH.,MO.

ROUENT MONTAN, M.C.

RICHAID S. SCHWEIKEN, PA.

GARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

FREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ, JH., CHIEF COUNSEL

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

United Bidies 2

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

SECRET

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO 5. RES, 21, RATH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C.

20510

July 14,

1975

w..

K. William O'Connor, Esq.

Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination

Office of the Deputy Attorney General

U. S. Department of Justice.

Washington, D. C. 20530

10/13/00 #mDR16

BYSP 2 Arm 171G

• ON: 25X1

"i'.

Dear Mr. O'Connor:

As indicated in the enclosure to the Committee's

July 9, 1975 letter to the Attorney General, we are still

awaiting several requested items which relate to the relation-

ship between the FBI and the CIA.

Although an FbI file seaich is pIccumably under-

way to locate all items which would be responsive to that

section of the Conmittee's request, we would appreciate

receiving as soon as possibla, as a partial"

Içsponde, ult

of the items bearing on this subject which were specifically

identified in the attachment to the Committee's May 14, 1975

request, as well as the exchange of correspondence between

the FBI

and the CIA which occurred on March 11 and 20, 1970,1

and which related to domestic intelligence collection. *

."

Finally, we would appreciate your advice concern-

ing the nature of "SCOPE" and Operation ORKID which are

identified in the above-referenced March 20, 1970. letter

(S)

from Director Helms to Director Hoover.

Your cooperation would be appreciated.

Sincerely,

(5)

Iuln2

RECEIVED

JUL 1: 10/5

Knoc

John I. Ellift

Director

Domestic Intelligence Task Force

*These letters refered to smiler

Tg

NWL65360_Docld:32989627 Page 166

colection. of freyn intellence?

wres

---

## Page 167

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

Addressee:

78

OLTR

[X LHM

→ Memo D Report dated.

7125/75

U. aS.

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Caption of Document:

Activities.

Re: SCOPE. (Relet

from captioned Committee 7/14/75 concerning.

nature of SCOPE.)

@riginating Office:

FBI

Delivered by:

8-8-75

Received by:

-

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

-

ALL INFORMATTON COMPRIS

REREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE 10/13/00 BY SP.2 ALANE

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 167

---

## Page 168

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO: Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

FAI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

ransmitiate to note!)

If a document was made availabl

& DOCUMENT 1

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW |

TESTIMONY

OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

7/20/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

10-13-00

#MDR 16

SSC

:SP-2ALM)1TG

Late.

titten

in tea

HSC

" IDENTURICA, & SPrPled de suiptive data for documents;

give name or identification number of briefer,

Niemozendua

5. Wise spots verbal sedate

SPoNs verbal sedate of item, merafive, esponse, formal request, other-

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

• C, o, 1

or

odeworo

SSC letter 7/14/75

used one senter

* emphasis late ke.

Surveillance, electronic

Intelligendo collection, domestic

from the list provided

separately; if key words not listed are

8. SUMMARY (see

reverse side before completing this item)

SCOPE was the code word for a special chonnelizing procedure

shereby information received fron an electonic survelllance

conducted by the FBI in the United States on a certain foreign

diploantic establishment as vell as selected foreign officials

fron the governent was dissentnated to interested United

States Govertment agencies. The code name SGUPD indlented

such information was to be handled in a most secure nanner

and access to it was to be restricted within these agencies to

only spocifically designated people. This channel lo no

Jonger being utilized, (S)

62-116395

TREAT AS YELLOW

(FMK: Emk:

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA IZAISON TO THE CENTRAL CONUNITY INDEX

IN CONHECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

379 | (6-75)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 168

---

## Page 169

INSTRUCIIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

"FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 169

---

## Page 170

goa.

ly 21, 1975

LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION

Attached teletype advises former

SA John Matter was requested by the Senate

Select Committee to make himself available

for interview at 11:30 a.m., 7-25-75.

Mr. Matter telephonically advised this will

be a staff interview concerning the Bureau's

investigation of Martin Luther King. He

requested a Bureau representative be

available for consultation during the interview.

Matter will be briefed by representa-

tives of the Intelligence and Legal Counsel

Divisions prior to his interview.

Legal Counsel Division recommends

that any applicable employment agreement be

waived for purpose of this interview and that

an Intelligence Division representative

accompany Matter to be available for consulta-

tion during interview.

Enclosure

PVD: ech

(3)

#MDRIG

ALE INTORMATION CONTAINED

ENRATN IS UNCLASSTYIED

DUNE 10-10-00 BYSR 2 AIM /ATE

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 170

fur

---

## Page 171

WR001 IF CODE

8:58AM URGENT JULY 21, 1975 JFD

TO

DIRECTOR

(62-116395)

FROIG

TAMPA

SENSTUDY 15

(105-5390)

TONESO IS UNCEASCIZ TUD

DAM3 10-10-00 mSP-2 ALm)HTE

Assoc. Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adia.-

Dep.-A.D.-Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval,

Spec. Inv.

Trainina/

regal

elephine Ric

D

rector Sec'y

TAIPA NITEL JULY 11,,1975.

ON EVENINE JULY 20, 1975, FORMER SA J0 MN MATTER, TELEPHONE

813-936-1691, VAS TELEPHONICALLY CONTACTED AT FI. MYERS BY

MIKE EPSTEIN OF SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE STAFF. EPSTEIN

REQUESTED MEETING AT FT. WERS THE NIGHT OF JULY 22 OR THE

MORNING OF JULY 23.

REC-26

ABOUT ONE HOUR ÄFTER INITIAL CALL, EPSTEIN CALLED MATTER

AGAIN AND FINALLY SET APPOINIMENT FOR FRIDAY, JULY 25, 1975,68 AUG 14 1975

11:30 A.Mo, ROOM 6308, NEW SENATE OFFICE BUILDING.

MATTER WILL TRAVEL TO WASHINGTOW FOR THIS MEETING AND

5/7

REQUESTS- SUPERVISOR PAUL DALY, LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION, TO

TELEPHONICALLY CONTACI HIM IN FT. MERS.

MATTER DESIRES

BUREAU REPRESENTATIVE AT MEETING JULY 25, 1975.

END

SIỐ FBIHQ CLR

PERSONNEL

:1v. Paul Das.

5360. Docld:32989627 Page 171

Vie

---

## Page 172

EX

-PROC

JUL 18

1975

FRANK CHURCH, IDAHO, CHAIRMAN

JOHN G. TOWER, TEXAS, VICE CHAIRM.

PHILIP A. HART, MICH.

HOWARD H. BAKER,

To TenN

WALTER F. MONDALE, MINN.

BARRY GOLDWATER, ARIZ.

WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, KY.

CHARLES MC C. MATHIAS, JR., MD.

ROBERT MORGAN, N.C.

RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, PA.

GARY HART, COLO.

WILLIAM G. MILLER, STAFF DIRECTOR

FREDERICK A. O. SCHWARZ, JR., CHIEF COUNSEL,

CURTIS R. SMOTHERS, MINORITY COUNSEL

AMORIG

SP-2. ALM/7T

¿nited States Senate

SELECT COMMITTEE TO

STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

(PURSUANT TO S. RES. 21, 94TH CONGRESS)

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20510

112100:00.

Senate de

July 16, 1975

75)

The Honorable Edward H. Levi

The Attorney General

Being handled by

U. S. Department of Justice

Washington, D. C. 20530

Means with ofe tharis

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm

Dep.

Asst.

Di

RECEIVI

1 7 1975

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv.

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell.

Laborator

Legakes iM

Plan. &Eval.

Spec. Inv..

Training -

Telephone Rm.

Director Sec'y

Dear Mr. Attorney General:

Thank you for your letter replying to our letter concerning

access by certain members of the Select Committee to files and

documents concerning them held by the Department, including the

FBI.

The Committee has resolved to adopt a slightly different

procedure than that proposed in your letter.

As you know, the

purpose of this particular request is to enable the members,

through analysis of materials relating to them, to obtain general

insights into how the Department of Justice, including the

Federal Bureau of Investigation, collects, maintains and retrieves

for itself material on Americans generally. Accordingly, we

suggest that at a mutually convenient time, the designated members

come to the Department or the Bureau and physically go through

the retrieval process with the persons who would be responsible

for performing that function in a real life situation.

The

Committee members do not wish to have their individual files

either removed from the filing system or "sanitized" prior to

their reviewing them.

LX-101

This proposed method of om-site review may help, moreover,

to alleviate the possible problems of disclosure to the particular

REC 2 may 203, -4/375--5/10

members which your letter adverted to.

We are sure that you

could discuss any remaining actual problems with the members

themselves at your premises, including whatever retrieval problems

may exist with respect to the letters from the members themselves

which you referred to.

JUL 25 1y7:

In the first instance, what the members seek is insight

The attached letter was forwarded

to the Bureau by the Department,

- LEGAL

AW 65360 Aboad: 218937 Page 172

---

## Page 173

-2-

and understanding. After the initial review, further steps to

record facts and reach conclusions can be agreed upon as

appropriate.

Senator Baker and Senator Philip Hart wish to be added to

the list of senators who wish to examine their own files.

sincerely yours

Chairman

Ahn

John Tower

Vice Chairman

(R-TEXAS)

lowe

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 173

---

## Page 174

1BJ

THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20505

Intelligence Community Staff

DCI/IC 75-2614

11 August 1975

- 25

MEMORANDUM FOR: Members_of_the_USIB 'Ád Hoc Coordinating

Group

SUBJECT

Security Clearances

rom cia.

812

Rec

Attached is an updated listing of staff personnel certified

by the Staff Director/Senate Select Committee as meeting the

requirements of Executive Order 10450 for access to classified

information up to and including TOP SECRET. Some of these

individuals have been certified as meeting the requirements of

DCID 1/14 and have been provided the appropriate briefing.

62116385-515

REC-26

EX- 1U!

Sech omas

USAt (Ret.

Chion Generanation Staff/tes

Attachment

ET: AUG 14 1975

Treat as original

/ENCLOSURE)

5-

#INDR16,

3110-10=00

NỮ A:300 & da: 3%89627 Page 174

---

## Page 175

IC STAFF VERIFICATION OF CLEARANCES

Staff Members of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities who have received a security 11 AUG 1975

investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation within the past five years and are certified as

meeting requirements of EQ 10450 for access to classified information up to and including TOP SECRET.

Name

Aaron, David

Bader, William

Bayly, John

Banoff, Barbara

Barkey, Howard

Baron, Frederick

Senz, Charity I.

Betts, Richard K.

Binkin, -Martin

Birdsell, Wayne

Bloomfield, Beth Susan

Bouschard, Samuel

Brissett, Belva

Brooks, Nancy

Brown, C. Harold

Brown, Maxine

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated Briefed

(SI, TK, B)

B 4/15

*

B:4/17

Date and

Place of Birth

*

*

8-21-38

• Ill.

•9-8-31

B 5/19

1-26-44.

B. 6/26

12-20-45

B 6/2.

1-26-17.

B 5/1.9

B 5/23

B 7/1.

B. 8/5

:12-2-47

7-23-46.

8-15-47

5-6-28

5-2-06

B 7/ 14(H, G, K) 12-23-51

B 6/10

3-12-24

B 6/10

6-23-41

•B 5/23

2-14-40

6-6-38

B. 6/26

8-8-28

• NJ.

DC

• Cal.:

Mo.

Conrl.:

NY

Pa.

Mo.

DC

Ohio

Maine •

Ok.

Ky

• Ohio

Ida.

Social

Security No.

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D

545-30-3377

490-01-6758

578-03-1841

007-18-3292

313-38-6773

568-40-3123

TE Badge

FK Act 5 (9) (2)(D)

DATON

SP-2 ALm|:7TG

ON CONTAINED

NW 65360 Docld:32989627, Page 175

---

## Page 176

Name

Bushong, David

Carpenter, Margaret:

Carter, Barry

Chesnick, Barbara

Culbreth, Elizabeth

Davisy Lynn

Dawson, Thomas

Dawson, Rhett

• DéMarco, James

Dennin, Joseph Francis

DeOreó, Mary

DeTemple, Mary:

r.:.

DiGenova, Joseph E:

Dick, James

Dillon; Molly

Doolittle, Patricia:

• Dwyer; Daniel

Eliiff, John

Epstein, Michael Taylor

NV ES5G0 B8ail:32989627 Page 176.

. A::

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated Briefed

(SI, TK, B)

Date and.

Place of Birth

*

*

B 71/4

B. 5/19

8-10-47

•8-27-44

B 4/24

•12-14-42

B 7/14

:4-18-46'

B 7/2•

6-23-42

B 4/17(Port), : 9-6-43.

B 6/26

9÷9-52.

B 5/19

12-9-43

B'6/26•

3÷12-43

'B.6.123

6÷9-43

B 6/26

B 7/29

B 6/26

6-13-17

6-16-25

•2-22-45

B 6/26.

7-25-47

B 6/10

4-16-51

8-12-43

•B 7/14

B. 5/23

B:6/26

8-24-52

6-30-41

3-10-37

8-30-46

Ohio

Cal:

Cal.

WI

NC

Fl.

@ Minn.

Il1.

W. Va.

NY

Ohio

Wisc.

Del.

Mass.

• Va.:

NC

Ma.

DC

Mass.

DC

Social

Security No.

JEK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

471-60-1688

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

394-20-5968

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

345-34-2468

JEK Act 5

(9) (2) (D)

11 AUG 1975

TF Badge

---

## Page 177

Name

Fenn, Peter

Ford, Harold

Gitenstein, Mark Henry

Grant, Bruce

Greissing, Edward

Hanback,

Sara Susan

Harrigan, Arthur

Hatry, Audrey Helen

Hodges, Paulette.

Inderfurth, Mark K.

Iverson, Portia :

Jefferson, Arthur M.

Johnson, Dorothy

Johnson, Loch

Johnston, James

Karalekas, Anne

Kayden, Jeffrey

Kelley, Robert

Kieves, Lawrence

Kirbow, Charles

Kirchheimer, Joseph

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated

Briefed

(SI, TK, B)

B 4/24

B 6/26

B. 5/28

B.7/2

'B 7/14

B 5/19

B 5/19

B. 7/29

B. 4/29

•B 7/14

B 6/26

B 4/29

B 7/29

•B 5/28

B 7/14

B 5/19

B 5/19

•B 4/24.

NW 65360 .Docld:32989627 Page 177

Date and

Place of Birth

12-12-47

3-23-21

3÷7-46

6-16-16

11-27-50

2÷4-46.

3-16-44

6-10-23

4-17-43

9-29÷46

10-22-50-

3-16-44

6-8-25

2-21-42

1-6-44

11-6-46

3-22-51

10-29-40

1-4÷48

10-2-22

6-3-17 •

Ma.

• Cal.

Ala.

Neb.

Germany

W. Va

NY

•Md.

#.Okla..

NC

W. Va.

N.Y

Or.

N. Zealand

Kan. '

Ma.

NY

Ind.

• NY

Ga.

Ill:.

Social

Security No.

550-16-4630:

507-20-13111

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

540-20-6413

JEK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

068-38-6464

252-12-5112

359-03-7843

111 AUG TY/5

SFK Açt 5 (g)(2)(D)

TE Badge

• TF Badge.

---

## Page 178

Name

Koppal, Diane

LaVoy, Diane

Liebengood, Howard

Lombard, Charles

Lynch, Mary

MacDonald, Naldeen

Madigan, Michael James

• Marshall, Benjamin

Marshall, Burké

Mascioli, Cynthia

Mason, Judy

Maxwell, Elliot Everett

Mayo, Betty

McCorkle, Daniel

Mecham, Martha Evans:

Miller, William G.

Monaco, Patricis

•NW 65360 Docld 32989627. Page 178;

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated Briefed

(SI, TK, B.)

•B 6/26

:B 6/10

B4/24

*.

!:

*..

B 4/15

; B 4/17

B 6/26

B 6/10

• B 4/15

B 6/26

B. 5/23

•B 4/15

•B 5/23

Date and

Place of Birth

• 6-24-48

11-10-48

12-29-42

6=2-30

:3-16-26

10-19-51

4-18-43

•5-4-19

•10-1-22

1-4-51

1-6-46

7-24-46=

:2-13-22

:6.-25-55

:2-11-40

8-15-31.

÷10-17-35

NC

Venezuela

• In.

France:

W. Va..

Brazil

DC.

NE

NJ

NY

DC

NY

Ohio

Ohio:

Cal.

NY

NJ

Social

Security No.

219-48-0018

JEK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

307-44-9707}

578-44-9471

JFK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

485-28-4503

°:577-44-5241

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

277-14-4062

528-48-6848

JEK Act 5 (9) 12) (D)

157-26-8100

11 AUG 19/5

• Badge

TF Badge

TF Badge

JFK Act 5 (g)(2)(D)

---

## Page 179

Name

Moore, Janet

Murphy, Michael

Nash, Dorothy

O'Flaherty; James Daniel

Orloff, Jan:

•Owens, Drena

Peterson, John F

Pitts, 'Susan

Postal, Andrew

Pyle, Christopher:

Quanbeck, Elton.

Ralston, Theodore

Rhea, Gordon

Richard, Eric.

Ricks, - Walter

Romberg, Alan

- Rowe, James

Schneider, Ruth

Schwarz, Frederick A. O. Il

Seidel, Lester

NW 65360. Docld:32989624 (Page 179.

• Compartmented

Clearance

Designated Briefed

(SI, TK, B).

*:.

*

: ..

. $

B 5/23 :

B 4/15

B 6/26

•B 6/2

B.6/26

B 6/10

B 7/23.

฿ 6/26

:B 5/19

B 7/23

B 6/26

B 7/10

฿ 6/26

B 4/22

B 5/19

:.B:5/23

B.4/15

•B 6/26

Date and

Place of Birth

4-9-43

Iowa.

10-13-54

:7-24-12•

11-4-42

11-14÷47

12-8-42

÷6÷15-41

10-24-53

:5-11-48

I1-24-39

•5-15-26

8-25-48

3-10-45

12-27-49

12-27÷46

12-1-38

6-6-51

•10-31-44

4-20-35

:7-17-44

Tex.

Wisc

Ill.

Cal.

NC

t. Cal.

Canada

NY

Mass.:

N. Dak.

Wash.

Va.

NY

Ga®

NY•

DC

Conn:

NỢ

DC

Social

Security No.

111 AUG 1215

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

399-14-4589

Badge

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

107-30-8583

JEK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

216-38-5204

---

## Page 180

Name

Shea, Patrick

Shelburn, Frank

Smith, Elizabeth

Smith, John I.

Smith, Stephanie

Smothers, Curtis

Snider, Lewis Brittle

Talley, Martha

Tascione, Rosemary:

Thoben,

Florence

'"..

Thomas, Robert.

Tomalonis; Alexandra.

Towell, Mary

Treverton, Gregory

Trueheart, William

Turner; James

Ischirgi, James.

Vance, James

Wallach, Paul

?°.

Ward, Fred

NW 65360. Docld:32989627 Page: 180

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated Briefed

(SI; TIS, B)

:B 4/15

B: 5/19.

"B 6/26

*i":

B 5/.16

B 4/24

B 6./26

*:

*

B 6/10

B 612

::B 6/2

B 7/14:

B 6/26

B. 7/23

-B.6/26

Date and

Place of Birth

2-28-48

5-30-13

6-21-49

373-39

3-23-54

8-26-43

: 1-12-45

9-7-50

6-23-45

6-2-10

12-16-25

6-1-48

4-25-44

1-21-47.

12-18-18

6-29-53

2-23-25

4-6-36

5-24-4.7

11-20-40

Utah.

Va.

NY

Kyo

Ohio

Md.

NC

NY

Ind.

Ma.

Ma.

Tern.

•Colo.

Va.

Cạl.

Wyo.

• Ohio

NY

• DC

Social

Security No.

JEK Act 5 (g) 12) 1D

338-24-6934

11 AUG 19/5

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

220-38-9869

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

085-34-6648

313-12-1857

219-14-5186

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

225-20-6411

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

520-16-7290

078-28-3950

JEK Act 5 (9) (2) (D)

225-50-9983

Badge

---

## Page 181

111 AUG 19/5

• Name

-White, William

Wides, Burton. Victor

Wiik, Carol Ann

Wilson, Otis

Zimmerman, Peter Brown

Zimmerman, Phebe

Compartmented

Clearance

Designated

Briefed

(SI, TK, 3)

B 7/10

B 4/17

!$..

• B 5/23

B•6/10

Yalready briefed:

B 8X5.X

Date and

Place of Birth

8-8-39

6-14-41

•4-21-51"

5-16-20.

3-26-46

12-1-50

• Mass'e

• Vạ.

Ill.'"

Ohịo

Social

Security No.

UFK Act 5 (g) (27(D)

168-30-9147

IF 'Badge

557-14-54614

JEK Act 5 (g) 12) (D)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627:PageM8t:

---

## Page 182

2 - Мк. J. А.

Mintz

(1 - Mc. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mic. W. R. Wannall

1-

Mit.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. T. E. Burns

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACIIVITIES (SSG)

July 16, 1975

EMORIS

1:2410-10-00-

By letter dated May 14, 1975, with attached

appendices, the SSC requested certain information and

documents from the FBI,

Enclosed for your approval and forwarcing to che

Committee 15 the original of a memorandun with enclosures

which is in response to two of the Committee's requests.

A copy of this memorandum with enclosures is being

furnished for your records.

Enclosures (6)

62-116395

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: K. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for

TEB: jmm/1hb |hb

(9)

EX-101

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs

Files & Comt_

Gen. Inv. -

ENCLOSURE

Ident.-

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval. -

Spoc. Inv. -

Training

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y

Bors (6dc 1%89627 Page 182

TELETYPE UNIT _

8/5/75166

OX: AUG 14 1975

pLM

molothes

4063 VI

GPO: 1975 0 -

---

## Page 183

62-116395

10110l00

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(1 - Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1

- Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. T. E. Burns

Jaly 16, 1975

to your request and is not for dissemi-

proceedings by

is limited to official

be disclosed to unauthorized person.

UNITED STATES SENACE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY COVERILIESTLAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT 20 IMTELLICENCE ACIIVIZIES (SSC)

RE: DOCUMENIS PERIATING TO THE

COMICTEE'S PRIOR REQUESIS

RE:

FURTHER DOCUMENIS PERTAIUING TO

THE FBI AND DEPAFIMENT OF JUSTICE

LALONE QEULISSVAREN SI ASUSAN

FBI."

is prepared in response

your Committee.

This document

nation outside

your Committee and the content may not

Reference is made to SSC letter dated May 14, 1975,

with attached appendices, requesting certain documents and

other information from the FBI.

approval of.

express

Item number 5.e., Appendix A, of referenced

communication requests all memoranda of the FBI and the

Justice Department discussing the legal authority of the FBI

to use informants, including possible entrapment, provocation,

interference with lawyer - client relationship, or other

problems, to (1) investigate internal security natters,

(2) collect intelligence information, and (3) engage in

counterintelligence activity.

nel without the

Items mumber 4.a. and 4.b. of Appendix B of referenced

communication requests, inter alia,

with regard to 5.e. above,

all menoranda and other materials relating to the original

Dep. ADAdm.decision to use the technique as vell as the policies and

Dep. AD In. procedures of the IBI for the utilization of the technique.

Admin. -

Comp.Syst._

Ext. Affairs

Enclosed with this memorandum is one memorandum

Files & Com. responsive to the request in 5.e. above, regarding tbe legal

Gen inauthority of the ISI to use informants.

Ihis memorandum is

Inspection captioned "Legal Authority of the FBI to Use Confidential

Laboratory

Informants as

Plan. & Eval.

an Investigative lechnique," and dated July

1973.

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

_TEB:eks

(8) 41

Original and one

6=2-116

Legal Coun..

dapy to Attorney

SHE MOLE PAGE 3 TIP

Telephone Rm. - !

General

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM V

TELETYPE UNIT L

PLM

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page M83

EMALACHER

---

## Page 184

United States Senate Select Committee

To Study Governmental Operations Wich

Respect to Intelligence Activities (SSC)

Re:

Documents

Pertaining To The

Committee's Frior Requests

Re:

Further Documents Pertaining To

The FBI and Department of Justice

Also enclosed is a copy of SAC memorandum 23-75

dated May 27, 1975, which is believed responsive to 5.e. This

particular SAC memorandum is being provided herewith, since,

In view of its recent date, it was not included in the index

of SAC letters and Memoranda previously made available to

the SSC Staff.

With regard to that portion of f.e., above, concerning

"possible entrapment, provocation, interference with lawyer -

client relationship of other problems," as it relates to

informant operation, there are no Bureau memoranda or other

material adtressing

these arcas, as the same policy and

procedures applicable to Special Agent conduct segarding these

problems similarly apply to informants. In response to your

general request under 4.b., above, FBI policy and procedures

concerning such matters are sec forth in the Manual of

Instructions (MOI) and the Manual of kules and Regulations (MRR),

which have already been made available to SSC Staff Members

pursuant to an earlier request and to the SAC Letters and

Memoranda which are being made available to SSC Staff personnel

for review pursuant to another request.

With respect to your request under Item 4.a., above,

no memoranda or other materials were located relating to the

original decision to utilize informants in our investigations.

It is noted your requests under Item 5., Appendix A,

of referenced communication were directed by you to boch the

FBI and the U. S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Our response

In this matter with respect to legal authority should therefore

be viewed in conjunction with any material you may have received

or till recelve from the D. S. DOJ.

Enclosures (2)

I - The Attorney General - 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 184

---

## Page 185

United States Senate Seleci Committee

To Study Governmental Uperations With

Respect l'o Intelligence Activities (SSC)

Ne:

Documents Pertaining Io The

Committee's Prior Requests

Ke:

Further Documents Pertaining Io

the FBI And Department Of Justice

NOTE:

The above response covers two separate requests

in Appendices'A and B since such requests are cross referenced

in the referenced SSC communication. The following sections

of the double zero files for the classifications shown were

reviewed by the vriter, Special Agent Thomas E. Burns, Jr.,

to locate memoranda discussing legal authority for utilization

of informants.

(134-00-7, 8, 9, 10, Il, and 12 (Security Informants)

137-00-1,

2, 3, 4,

5, and 6 (Criminal Informants)

170-00-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (Extremist Informants)

The enclosed memoranda dated July 24, 1973,

vere culled from the 137-00 file. This matter was coordinated

with Paul G. Donahue and Paul V. D-ly of the Office of Legal

Counsel.

-3 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 185

---

## Page 186

1 0. 10

3010-106

186559

cow;

GIA CEN. RI

"30.27

UNITED STATES GÜVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

Mr. Mintz

DATE:

7/24/73

FROM

P. G. Donahue

#mDE16

SUBJECT: LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE FBI

TO USE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANTS

AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE

The legal authority of the FBI to use confidential

informants as an investigative technique rests upon three factors:

1) Legislative authority embodied in the approval

of the annual appropriation.

2) Case law that the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth

Amendments do not protect a wrongdoer from

the use of informants.

3) Case law reflecting that courts recognize the

necessity and utility of informants in providing

provavie cause fui making arrests without u

warrant, and for obtaining warrants, provided

that certain conditions are met.

Regarding the first of the above-cited factors,

reference is made to the "Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the

Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Departments

of State, Justice and Commerce, the Judiciary and Related Agencies

Appropriations for 1974."

Part I, page 783 of those hearings, sets forth che -

justification language for the 1974 budget estimate for FBI salaries

and expenses. It is noted that this language is the same as used in '

previous years except for underlined and bracketed changes which

do not affect this subject. There is specific provision under the

PGD: 11r

nation outside your Committee.

This document is prepared in respons to your request und is not for dissemi-

li se is timited to official proceedings o.

vour. Committee and the content may nut be disclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approval of the FBI.

12-1163951

CONTINUED - OVER

ENCLOSUREI

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 186

---

## Page 187

Memorandum Donahue to Mr. Mintz

Re: LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE FBI TO USE CONFIDENTIAL

INFORMANTS AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE

heading of "Salaries and Expenses" for "expénses necessary for the.

detection and prosecution of crimes against the United States" and

more specifically for the "payment of rewards."

At page 879 of these hearings, there is set forth

as part of the testimony on "Investigative Accomplishments, " a

paragraph detailing the statistics achieved by the use of confidential

informants. Since Congress has approved FBI appropriations without

objection to the use of money for "payment of rewards" or for the

informant achievements listed in the testimony, the approval of the

appropriations serves as one form of legislative approval for the

use of informants.

• The use of informants does not violate the defendant's

rights under the Fourth Amendment. Hoffa V. United States, 385

U.S. 293 (1966).

"Neither this Court, nor any member of it has

ever expressed the view that the Fourth Amend-

ment protects a wrongdoer's misplaced belief

that a person to whom he voluntarily confides

his wrongdoing will not reveal it. Indeed, the

Court unanimously rejected that very contention

---in Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427---"

Id. at 302

The Court also held that the use of an informer did

not violate Hoffa's rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments;

citing United States v. Dennis, 183 F. 2d 201, 224, (1950), which

said,

"Courts have countenanced the use of informers

from time immemorial; in cases of conspiracy,

or in other cases when the crime consists of

preparing for another crime it is usually necessary

to rely upon them or upon accomplices because

the criminals will almost certainly proceed

covertly."

-2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 187

---

## Page 188

Memorandum. Donahue to Mr. Mintz

Re:

LEGAL AUTHORITY OF THE FBI TO USE CONFIDENTIAL

INFORMANTS AS AN INVESTIGATIVE TECHNIQUE

Besides the explicit recognition reflected above of

the right of investigative bodies to avail themselves of informants,

there are other Supreme Court cases which implicitly recognize

this right by regulating the conditions under which an informant's

Identity need be revealed at trial. (Roviaro y. United States,

353 U.S. 53 (1957)), or the conditions to be met in using an

informant's information as the basis of probable cause for an

arrest without a warrant. Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307

(1959); McCray v. Ilinois. 380 U.S. 300 (1967)). Similarly,

the Supreme Court has recognized that informant information may

form the basis for a warrant application, provided the affidavit

shows the underlying circumstances which would give reason to

believe the informant is credible, and circumstances showing

the basis for conclusions reached by the informant. (Aguilary.

Texas,

. 378 U.S: 108 (1964)).

The above-cited cases show that while courts have

circumscribed in several ways the uses to be made of informant

information, there has always been a recognition of the fact that

the informant is a basic and necessary weapon in law enforcement's

defense of society against crime.

RECOMMENDATION:

None; for information.

- 3

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 188

---

## Page 189

DIRECTOR

ZAL ATTENTION

MEMENANDUM

23-75

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

' JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20535.

May 27, 1975

ATL PrTO."

12120

Iran tr

1510-1000 5P2 ALm 116:

MEMORANDUM TO ALL SPECIAL AGENTS IN CHARGE:

(A) INFORMANT MATTERS - DEFENSE PLANS AND STRATEGY -

Recently there have been several instances where attorneys in connection

with law suits have publicly and erroneously alleged that the FBI utilized

intormants to uncover defense plans and strategy. Also, recently a former

informant falsely alleged that informant's services were utilized by the

Bureau to infiltrate a defense camp.

These accusations reemphasize the

need for the careful and protessional handling of informants at all times.

As you are aware under current policy, informants are advised

to avoid becoming involved in defense plans or strategy in subversive-type

cases or with anyone under criminal indictment. It is the responsibility

of all Special Agents handling intormants to insure that their informants

are continually alert so that they will avoid becoming invoived in defense

matters and in the event an informant is requested to assist or partake in

such matters, that the contacting Agent is immediately advised so that the

matter will be recorded. If the inormait cannot avoid being involved,

informant is not to report any information pertaining to defense plans or

strategy and such incident must be promptly reported to the Bureau under

the substantive case caption.

In view of the above, the statement of cooperation normally

signed by security and extremist informants is being amended to incorporate

current policy regarding defense plans and strategy. Where it is not required

as in criminal informant cases or it has not been practical to obtain a state- •

ment of cooperation, each handling Agent must orally advise the informant

of the above, reduce it to writing, and record it in the informant's file. Insure

that all pending informant files reflect the above as a matter of record.

Manual changes follow.

This document is prepared in response tô your request and is not, for dissemi-

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedings by

your Committee and the content may not be aisclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approvat of tharence M. Kelley

Director

5-27-75

MEMORANDUM 23-75

62-1163957

ENCLOSURE

NW-65360-Đoeld:32989627-Page 189

---

## Page 190

-

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Senate Select Committee

Addressee:

O LTR

→ Report dated.

7/16/7.5

Senate Select Committee Re:

Documents

Capion of Document-pertaining to the Committee's Brior

Request. ' Re: Further Documents Pertaining

to the

Appendix

EBA,

and Department of

Justice.

Item pf•, Appendix B Items 4.2.,

Originating Office:

Delivered by:

_ Date: 818

Received by:

The

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

#MDR16

ATL TIYERTATION COURATNED

HERET IS UNUTA."

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 190

---

## Page 191

110 %

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

FROM:

ATTN: Central Index

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

appropriate term.

If a document was made available

but not transmitted, so note.)

* DOCUMENT I

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

I TESTIMONY|

OTHER

NOTE: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

2. DATE PROVIDED

7/16/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

4. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Manorandun and enclosures

IN RESPONSE

To (list date and item number if in

response to formal request, other-

wise state verbal request of (name), initiative,

subpoena,

6.

CLASSIFICATION OF

etc.)

INFORMATION (enter

U, c,

SSC letter 5/24/75. Appenâix A,Se; Appendix B, 4a56

Codew ra)

TS

or

U

Fothe ppasopriate key words from the list provided separately: if key words not listed

Intelligence collection

Operating procedures

w:110/10/00 SP-2 ALmEG

COILTZLPRO

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Fuznishlag SSC nonorendun captionel "logol Luthority of the

Est to Use contidential Inforuants as en Investigative

Technique," Concoraing "possible entrapment, provocation,

interterence with lawyc cilent relationship or other

problonsi as it sclatco to infarmant operation, there are no

Burcay menozando or othen naterials. FBI policy and

procedures concerning such matters are set forth in the

Manual of Instructions and the lazual of Rules and

Regulations.

02-116395

FIK: Emk

(4)

TREAT AS YELLOW

IN CONNECT WISE SEAL CONSUNTY INDEX

379| (6-75)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 191

CLASSIFY AS

APPROPRIATE

---

## Page 192

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate. Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 192'

---

## Page 193

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. --.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin,

*conp.Syst.c

Ext. Affairs —

Files & Com. _

Gen. Inv. --

Fident.

Inspection ano

Intell. -

Laboratory n

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv.

Training

egal Coul

lephone

AƯG 1 9 197 ROOM

Docld:32989627 Page 193

The Attorney Ceneral

Director, FBI

2 - Legal Counsel Division

(1-Mr. J.B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

June Il, 1975

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. D.

R. Dickson

MON NANCi

#MDRIG

UNITED STATES

SENATE SELECT

CONMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES (SSC)

This is in response to SSC letter, with attached

appendices, dated May 14, 1975, requesting certain

documents and other information from the FBI.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the

Committee is the original of a memorandun and enclosures

which constitutes our response to one of the requests.

A

copy of the memorandum and enclosures is being provided

for your records.

Several of the enclosures pertain to telephono

conversations between former Prosident Johnson and former

FBI Director Hoover. In accordance with the request of'

Mr. K. William O'Connor, we are deferring to him any

action necessary to obtain appropriate clearance from the

White Ilouse to furnish these documents to the Committee.

Enclosures (16)

62-116395

REC25

soot

I - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: K. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for

ENCLOSURE

Intelligence Coordination*t. AUG 14 1975

DRD: mjEN:?

(9)

NOTE:

It is noted that the original request from the

Committee, specifically to furnish all memoranda pertaining

to

• "conduct"' of the FBI investigation in the Dominican Republic

in 1965 is rather ambiguous and nonspecific and efforts to

clarify this request have not met with much success to date.

to their

some future

date,

same will be considered.

jr?

13

TELETYPE UNIT

670 651-346

---

## Page 194

-тО

G2-176305

2 - Legal Counsel Division

(1-Mr. J.B. Hotis)

1 - Mr.W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. D. R. Dickson

June 11, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNIENIAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: DOCUMENTS PERTAIHING TO THE "JUSTON

PLAN"', COINIELPRO, AND OTIFE PRACTICES

AND PROGRAMS

OTHER SPECIFIC FBI PRACTICES AND PROGRAMS

Reference is made to the letter from the captioned

Committee dated Hay Is, 1975, and appendices thereto, WiiCh

contained requests for cortain documents and othor information

from the

FBI.

Appendix C, FartIII, Itch #28 requested all

menoranda and other materials pertaining to the origins and

conduct of the FBI investigation in the Dominican Republic

(ОП) in 1965.

Pursuant to your request, attached hereto are the

following connunications:

1. Director Hoover memorandum dated May 17, 1965.

2.

A. H. Belmont memorandum to Mr. Sullivan datcd

May 17, 1965, captioned, "Lugal Attache's Offico, Dominican

Republic."

3. SAC letter no. 65-31 datcd June 2, 1965.

4. Director Hoover menorandum dated August 24, 1965.

5, Diroctor Hoover memorandum datod September 10, 1965.

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. co

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst._

Ext. Affairs

Filos & Com. -

Gen. Inv.--

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory

Plon. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. _

Training -

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. _

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 194

!'

DRD: mjgn

(9)

Ches document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi

ORD

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to offreial proceedings ay

your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unautherized person,

nel without the express approval of the FBI .

pur

wift

TELETYPE UNIT L

470 76-540

---

## Page 195

United States Senato Seicet Committeo

to Study Covcrumental Operations With

Respoct to Intelligence Activities

Re:

Docunents Pertaining to the "Juston

Plan

, Cointelpro, and Other Practices

and Programs

Other Spocific IBI Practices and Prograns

Mr. W. R. Wannall memoranaun to Ar. W. C.

Sullivan dated August 22, 1066, captioned,

"Operations Legal

Artache, Santo Domingo Offico.

7. NEl letter to Dopartment of State dated June 20,

1958.

It is notco two oi these documents do not pertain

to the ycar 1965 as indicated by your request; however, they

have been included to show the reduction in our staff at our

Logal Attache's Office in Santo Domingo in August, 1966, and

June, ayoo, as weld as to show the change in our mission in

the Dominican republic erfective august, 1900.

For your

additional infornation, the legal Attacho's OIfice in the

Doninican Republic Was closed in April, 1969,

Icierence is also made to a conferonce held on

May 30, 1975, between Mesars. John I, Elliff and Harl Gitenstein

Senate Selcet Connittee; Mr. K. Willian O'Connor of

the Department of Justice; and lessrs. Willian O. Cregar and

Elmer W. Larson of the I3l. The question was asked by

Mr. Ellitf whether there is a

summary or "post-norten" in the

FBI 1iles Which could bo nade availablo to tho Cornirice

covoring the IDI's activities in the Doninican Republic.

le was indicated that if no such summary or "post-nortem" was

in our files, to so advise the Committee.

This is to adviso

that we havo been unable to locate same in our files.

Enclosures (7)

I - The Attorney Coneral

=2 m

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 195

---

## Page 196

SECRET

2:44 PM

#mDe)6

DEcLASSIFIEDI

11-15-0

May 17, 1865

MEMORANDUM FOR ME. TOLSON

MR. BELMONT

ME. DE LOACH

ME. SULLIVAN

Fresident Lyndon B. Johnson callel and asked it I wouid check

one

as they want him to be the Chief of the Array

in the Dominican Ropublle, which would, in entact, control the city. The

President stated he did not know his tiret name.. I asked ii he was in the.

Dominican lepublic at the present time. The Fronident stated he was; that

they were getting pretty ciose to a sottlement with

and he thought we

had checked him out, but anyway I had the whole list and he wants to he sure

they are ciceited and that there are none who are known communists because:

that is one thing both the right and left wings would attack him cas, so the on?

way to protect him, the Presilent, is to be sure thay are not communista.

The President stated another thing is how are they going to get rid oi ine

communiets wien we do get a goverament. I stated that is going to acpend

on the strength of the one in power.

I told the President that in connection with

vino li

going down to Puerto Rico with

on the 2:00 Pm plane, we have an

Agent who is going on the same piane, but as to nether we can get a microphone

in, we do not lanow because

is living in a house rather than a hutel. I

stated one oi our Agents is driving

to the airport in his car so he

will have an opportunity to tats to

The President asked is

knew he was an Agent and i stated he does as he had interviowed

but the Agent on the plane will not be lown to

I stated when

arrives in Puesto lico, a surveillance will be put on him out ii he stays with

as-wa anticipate, it will be dificult to cover except the telephones. I

stated there are live lines operating between Pucrto hico and the Dominican

Republie and we have all five lines covered.

The President Inguired as to whether they had asked me to assemble

a stalt thelp on the anti-communist thin mer the toreover and l stated the only

names I have are of the Cabinet

She Presiuent statad that alter they get the

Classific by X14

CDS, Cntreory 223

Homes la

pification.IndextuadX

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 196

SET

---

## Page 197

Way 17, 1985

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, DeLoach, Sullivan

government in the alternatives are: Let them fight it out and kill thousands

and probably the communists wouid end up in charge; we can go in there and

try to get them to agree and go on the constitution and let there vote on it In

60 or S0 days, expervice the election and have a cabinet we mutually agreed

upon which I can check upon; then cuce we got it, holy the President with

some intelligence peuple to point up wo are communists. We said they ought

to be Latins or ones who spenk the longuage and he wanted me to take charge

of that and to start right now saying til were President, what I would do down

there to get rid of the communists. The President stated it can't be done in

one day, but that is what he wants for the Dominican Repuclic.

I told the President I had quite a number of Agents, & hundred or so,

who are expert in the Sponish language so we have the lacilities that we can do

that.

The Fresident asised that I look at the best ones and see who it is; that

it has to be a fellow who can get along with the new President whom he can

trust, to figure out what I need, how I would set it up, and what I would do

to get set up to go to work on the communists.

I stated I thought it can be

covered as we do in the South American countrics as we have in some foreign

countries a Legal Attache aitached to the Embassy and if we bave a man

• from the Burcau attached to the Embassy is hagal Attache, he can ve the

Isediun through which to advise the President and select the individuals

who ought to be listed, deported, or put under control. The President asked

I get the results of the check to him as soon as possible on

2:56 PM

While talking to the Attorney General on another matter, I advised

him the Prescient had just called and wanted a name checied, but aiso wanted

me to pick a squad of "DI Agents to go to the Dominican Lopublic when the

nay government is formed to advise the President on tne renoval di communists

and getting them out of government oices. I priced the Attorney beneral on

my conversation with the President. I told him i was not enthusiastle about it,

but since he wants it dons, i was starting to louk into it and trying to line us

fifteen or twenty men able to do it. i told the Attorney General I lad wante

bin to know in the event the President speaks to him about it.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 197

---

## Page 198

May 17, 1965

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Deboach, Sullivan

I also bricied the Attorney General in regard to

and the coverage on that.

8:05 PM

The President called and stated the name of the indivichal he

had asked me to check is a graduate of the Canal Zone chool and his cocipiete

name Was

I stated we can check that quietly. .

The President asked 1 be sure that I and Admirai Kaborn, head of

the Central Intelligence Agenty, check out because he, the reaident, did not

want to agree on a government and find a khrushchev as the nead o1 it. i

stated I would checi. on the names he had given me kriday.

i asked the

President i Aumiral aborn had been furnished the list and he states he

was not sure but he wanted the two of us to check them out careially. .

Very truly yours,

N.A. H.

: John Edgar Hoover

Director

CRET

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 198

---

## Page 199

~OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

4318-104

MAY 1942 EDITION

адА Сем. 110. N0. 28

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

MR. SULLIVAN

DATE: 5/17/65

FROM : . A. H. Belmont

SUBJECT:

LEGAL ATTACHE'S OFFICE,

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

mDR 6

AGI INFORRATIOS OUTATIO

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFLA

DATS 1-15-00 BY SP 2 ALM 11162

The Director advised that the President will want the FBI to

set up a group in the Dominican Republic to advise the President of

the Dominican Republic concerning Communists, how to deal with them,

and how to get rid of them.

It is contemplated that we will set up

a Legal Attache's Office, with a group of 20 to 25 men, for the purpose

taking charge of cleaning out communists in the Dominican Govern-

ment and advising the government of those who may try to infiltrate.

into the government.

This activity would take place first in the

city of Santo Domingo, and then extend throughout the country until

all communists have been spotted and the Dominican Government has been

advised.

All of the agents to be sent down should be fluent in Spanish

and we should select any who have Dominican or Spanish blood; which

will assist them in working inconspicuously with the populace.

Relative to the Legal Attache,

he should be a top man, fully

experienced, as he will be dealing. with the President of the Dominican

Republic and with our Ambassador there.

ACTION:

draw up suggestions for a Legal Attache and for a group of twenty to

In anticipation of the abattache ordered,

above, the Director desires that we

twenty-five men who can proceed, when so ordered, to the Dominican...

Republic for this purpose.

A copy of this memorandum is being designated for the

Administrative Division so that the Domestic Intelligence Division

and the Administrative Division can work together on this.

Time

'Is of the essence.

nation outside. your Committee.

nel without the express approval of the FBI .

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 199

---

## Page 200

PSONAL ATTENTION

LETTER NO. 65-31

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

In Reply, Please Rejer io

June 2, 1965

• WASHINGION, D.C. 20535

File No.

(A) DOMINICAN SITUATION (NATIONALITY GROUP COVERAGE - LATIN

AMERICA-- For your information, Bureau has established a Legal Attache

in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, who has already begun to make a

valuable contribution to the over-all efforts of the United States in making

certain that the Dominican Republic does not become another Cuba. If the

United States succeeds in its efforts to keep communists out of the new

Dominican coalition government which is in the process of being formed,

current United States policy in the Dominican Republic could very well

become the established course of action for all other countries in Latin

• America threatened with communism.

The responsibilities which have been placed upon the Bureau

in developing intelligence data in the Dominican Republic, as well as in

other Latin-American countries, are not only tremendous but may be the

heaviest and most far-reaching burden the FBI has ever been asked to

assume in the intelligence field. To guarantee our complete success,

teamwork is a must.

Accordingly, first we must do everything possible to assist

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo, in his immediate task of developing

quality sources of sufficient quantity to effect maximum coverage in the

Dominican Republic.

In this regard, each office and Legal Attache must furnish

to the Bureau within five days of the receipt of this letter under the caption

of "DOMSIT" (code word for "Dominican Situation") the following:

(1) Identities of any established sources (former or current)

who are now in the Dominican Republic.

(2) Persons in Dominican Republic known to personnel of

your oftice who appear to have good source potential.

(3) Identities of any current security sources (regardless of

nationality) who may be available for assignment (temporary or permanent)

in the Dominican Republic if such is considered feasible by Legal Attache,

Santo Domingo.

This document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi-

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedings by

your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approval of the FBI :

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 200

ALL INFORMATIOU CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UYCLASSITIEO

DATE 1L/28/00 Bx58

---

## Page 201

Any leads for purpose of checking background of potential sources

for Santo Domingo must receive priority attention and results submitted by

teletype.

In addition to the Dominican requirements placed upon the Bureau,

your attention is directed to over-all need for additional informants and

sources in the Latin-American field. The reputation the Bureau has gained

during recent Dominican crisis is due in large part to the results achieved

in developing Dominican sources through a concentrated informant develop-

ment program over the past several years.

In view of critical state of unrest in Latin America today, each

office should survey its informant coverage in this field. If substantial

numbers of nationals of any Latin-American country reside within the

territory covered by your office, Bureau expects that you will have coverage

sufficient to alert you to exile organizational activities of political nature,

plots to overthrow existing governments, and general intelligence data

concerning the countries of interest. Informant development in this fiela

is considered most important and any weaknesses which now exist must be

overcome promptly by instituting an aggressive informant development

program.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover

Director

6/2/65

SAC LETTER NO. 65-31

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 201

2

---

## Page 202

8:04 7. I.

Auguot 84, 1805

LANMIORANDULE DOR VIR. TOLSON

MR. BELMONT c

EMORIO

ALL INFORMATION CERTAIN

MR. DE LOACH

HERBAL IS UIOHASSIBIED

BIR. SULLIVAN

1-15-00 TX SP2 ALMIG

I called Admiral Willam F. Radorn, Director o1 CIA, and

Rold hima I wanted to pass on to him a development he may ba asked about.

& stated, about ten daye ago, the reaiden assed my vion of the remoral:

of my men from tha Dominican Republic and whether the work we have

been doing doin there could be carried on by CiA as efiectively ao both

agencies have handled i in the past.

I diated & checked with ton

the la in charge of the FBI's

ofiice in the Dominican Republic, and he felt very adrongly the f3i men

could be withdrawn and the CiA pessonnel carry on, jaûvised Adolial

Paborn that i sons this messare do the Walte House and got word irom

Risrvin Warson that the President indicaiod no move enouá no mada at

this time and that ous inon ace stili dow there.

I advised Admiral Raborn that I expocì to see the Bresident

this wee's and i am going to bring this up to see whother he will makes

decision; that to could use those men ones here; and that I thinks the

situation is woll in hand by CIA personnel. I said i jacught the Freaiden.

might male some inquiry of Admiral haborn.

Admiral Raborn sald he certainly appreciated my calling and

he is delighted with the ilna way our doles have gotten along; thas thore is

=3

¡a lot of mutual respec. & stated sons a instructed do

=. p.

"know what his views were and did not tell him mine; shat he was vasy high

In praiso di the man in chargo ci sno did oldice, Ra wall as the stair oi

this ofice. Admiral Rabora ninted thoy walcome cooperation with the

FBi deany and every place.

This document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi-

nation outside your Committee.

Its use is limited to official proceedings. by

your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approval of the FBI .

NW 65360. Docld:32989627 Page 202

---

## Page 203

•7.1

8-55

L'emorandum for Mesara. Tolsos, Belmont,

DeLoach, and Sulliran

August 24, 1005

I stated that I think we are going to have trouble down there

but I think CLA can handle it with their force. He replied that they will

be delighted to have us stay but they cartainly appreciate the fact we

may need our people elsewhere. I said we need them in this country

where the rlots are occurring; that this la not resily our ilcid; tiat 1t

is CIA'a flel; and that the sooner we get back to our own fled, tha

better.

I again stated it is very likely the President may speak to

Admiral Raborn about this and he thanked me for calling.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover

Director

65360

Docide

627. Page 203

---

## Page 204

• * .

8:52 PM

IMDRI

ALL INFORMATION COSTAINIS

§ UNCIASSIFIZA

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. TOLSON

ME. BELMONT

MR. DE LOACH

ME. SULLIVAN

September 10, 1865

President Lyndon B. Jonnson called. He stated he was worried avout

the situation in the Dominican sepuolic and asked me how I icit about it. I

told him it was my feeling that it is in an ariul mess; that there have been several

people who have been selected to be in the Cabinet who are ian irom being free

of corcmunist association or domination and wiy they were selected, i did not lnow,

but I thought the situation down there is very critical. I stated i met with

McGeorgo Bundy and Aumiral Willlam Laborn of the Central Intelligence Agency

(CLA) the other day as to whether the F5i could withdraw from the Dominican

Fepublie and ay view was that we could as CLA is thorcugidy quaittic and haa

& good man down there to carry on the responsibilities and there is no necd for

the her to remain. I scated it was the view of admiral laborn and myseii that

it was going to be a mess and that we woule have trouble for some time to come

because various peopie are going bacis to the cominican it. publle now, such as

and his followers, and the former fresicients who were deposed and

I thought in the political campaign which is going to be heid down there this year,

there are going to be violent outbursts waich are characteristic i the Letins.

I stated the populace is very anti-American nd now thai

has

been sent out and icada

the rebel element, which is

always strongly anti-American, will be in the ascenuancy. I stated

is not what one would call a etrung man; set I think he means well and

will try to do rigit but he is not the kind of a mian who will stand up to his

opposition.

The President stated he was not too happy with CIA and the reports

he gets from them and he would hate to see the bureau people pull out until a

government is formed. I stated we wouidn't until he, the resident, says so;

that as I said the otner day, we would not leave until the decision has been iliade

by tue President.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 204

---

## Page 205

September 10, 1965

Memorandum for Messes. Toleon, Selmont, DeLoach, Sullivan

The Fresident atated that while he thinks Admiral Haborn is &

wonderiul man, this is piaying for koeps and we can't have a communist

Coverament and we have to have somebody alert cucugh to stana up and say

"this is suspiclous," et ceterd. The Fresident stated they teii him they bave

an Attorney General who is quite suspicious. I stated ne is very dangerous

to have in the Attorney General position. I stated in the discussion we had the

other day in Nr. Gundy's oftice, one matter was how the invetigative set-up

would be under the now government and they were going to have a riging squadron

of men working directly ice the tresiient of the Dominican Lebuolic and thon

an intelligence unit which would gother infor ration ana a Dominican national

police. I stated 1 expressed my opinion tuat i thought it was wrong for the

President to have a ilying squadron wnich would de nothing more er 1a85 0h2u

& secret police like Trujillo bad. who would make just reports the Fresident

would want against certuin anuiquals who raignt not be as bad as dae prosident

felt they were. I stated I feit there siould be an inteliience unit and that tna

national police saould ve increased. I stated we, of course, would assist in

any training program they inignt want to set ap either down there or up here..

I stated at tire present time in the national police is one nian vino vas trainedi

In our National Acadeny and was very valuable in iu misning us with intor tultion

that we could not have gotten iroin other sources.

The President asked li we were having any trouble worising together

and I told him no trouble at all. The Presicent stated he had asked me to be

on the job to keep the communtsts froin taring over this hemispere and to

serve hiin and he tought we ought to wait and not full cit oi the Lominican

Republe until the govesnment has jeen selected and we get along furtner in

this; for me to toll my ian down there to root out everything he can and to uc

hard and tough as he can and is sure we get rid ol evary epy; that he dia not know

what the diplomatic peopie are doing to ece that President Godoy tases our

reports and respects them. I stated I understand the Atiorney General was

recommended by

I stated a large number of people are critting back into the Dominican

Republic from New Yors and Miami who have been exiled in the past and those

who have been in political lie in the past are going to run again.

• 2=

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 205

---

## Page 206

Septeraber 10, 1865

Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, DeLoach, Sullivan

The President atated we have to have an Ambassador who is a

practical fellow and one who understanishis job. I stated he needea a good,

tough indivical who wii be aoic to stand no and dominate mue trezzuent.

'The President ached, "who is he?" and told me to tainä about that and aiso

about what we are doing and nut doing that should be done, at we can't lose

and he would be talking with we next week. I told him I woud.

Very truly joul's,

J. E. Ha

John Edgar Ecover

Director

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 206

---

## Page 207

SMIE FORAIMO. 'SÔ

110-16

таб сем, ёго. но. 2

UNITED STATES GC

NMENT

Memorandum

TO

• W. C. Sullivan

DATE:

August 22, 1966

FROM : Ar. W. R. Wannall

SUBJECT: OPERATIONS

LEGAL, ATTACHE,

USANTO DOMINGO OFFICE

This is to recommend that the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA) be advised that we have set up a regular Legal

Attache Office in Santo Domingo in view of the President's

desire that the FBI remain in the Dominican Republic and that

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo, be authorized to turn

informants over to the Agency.

In accordance with the desire of the President arc

recommendation of the Honorable Marvin Watson, Special

Assistant to the President, that the FBI remain in the Domi-ican

Republic, the Director, on 8/2/66, advised the White House

that our

staff in Santo Domingo would be reduced to three men

and that henceforth this office will be manned in a nanner

similar to that of our other Legal Attache Offices. It will not

¿ be an operational öffice but father will serve as a strategic

listening post for intelligence data and as liaison with

agencies of the Dominican Republic, as well as other agencies

of come governe ta that country.

=÷.

In light of this redirection of effort, we instructed

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo, to review his informant covéraze-

to determine if any of our informants should be made availasie

to the Agency for operation. Legal Attache has recommended

that as informants, treat

an, be turned over to CIA.

Lonel has been used principally to develop subversive data

on individuals in Santiago, Dominican Republic.

is

a penetrative-type informant who has gained membership in

Dominican subversive groups. Both of these sources are

operational and are not the type we would contact in a nornal

laison capacity. Continuation of their services under our

current criteria would be a questionable procedure.

This document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi-

nation outside your commitiee..

Its use is. limited to official proceedings by

your committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approval of the FBl .

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 207

---

## Page 208

Kemorandum W. R. Wannall to W. C. Sullivan

Re:

OPERATIONS

LEGAL ATTACHE, SANTO DOMINGO OFFICE

In the case of

this informant was originally

developed by the New York Office. Legal Attache suggested

the New York Office might have use of informant's services.

This information furnished to New York Office which replied

that in the absense of organized activity informant would be

of no use unless he came to New York with instructions from

Dominican communist groups to reorganize activity.. This,

of course, is not a desirable situation.

OBSERVATIONS:

We believe Legal Attache, Santo Domingo's recommendation

to turn

over to CIA. is sound,

even though

both of these sources are in a position to furnish valuable

intelligence information to us. By making these informants

available to the Agency we will avoid any possible duplication

or conflict. This matter should be discussed with appropriate

officials by our Liaison Agent in order to insure the Agency

is fully aware of our current status in the Dominican Republic.

ACTION:

.=..

If you approve:

(1) Liaison Agent will advise appropriate CIA

officials as follows:

In accordance with the desire of the President that

the FBI remain in the Dominican Republic, we are setting up a

regular Legal Attache Office in Santo Domingo consisting of

three men. This will not be an operational office but rather

will serve as a strategic listening post for intelligence data

and as liaison with agencies. of the Dominican Republic, as

well as other agencies of foreign governments in that country.

" In connection with this reorganization, we have instructed our

• representative in Santo Domingo to make is informants avail-

able to the Agency in the event it may wish to operate them.

2) The attached teletype, with instructions to

make

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo.

A available to CIA, will be sent-to the

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 208

---

## Page 209

June 20, 1968

BY LIAISON

SimORIG

ARE INTO NATION DUNNINDO

HERBIN IS UNCLASSIBIM

DARE 15:00 INSPLANTE

Ronorable Idar Rinestad

Deputy Under Secretary for Administration

Department of State

Hashington, D. C.

Dear Mr. Rimestad:

You have previously been advised of reductions

• In FBI personnel overseas which were made in response to

the wishes of the President.

In a iurther eriort to

comply with the desire of the President, I have decided

to reduce our stali in Santo Domingo by one Special Agent

and one clerk. This vill eliminate one position in GS-14

and one position in GS-8.

You may be sure that I will continue to give

this matter close scrutiny with a view to effecting further

economies whenever such action can be taken without impairing

the discharge of our responsibilities:

sincerely yours,

This document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi

Its use is limited to official proceedings o3

your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person

nel without the express approval of the L'Bl.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 209

---

## Page 210

SERIET

MCMORANDUM FOR MI. TOLSON

ME. DE LOACH

I MORIG

DECTASSTETED BY SPRAImaTE

oX 11-15-00

May 17, 1865

12020302 2. Johncon called and asited it l would check:

OnC(

00105-1

Jas they want him to be the Gaiet ot the Army...

IT.

Jenkomeone Waten would, in cllect, concroi too eity.

The

„Toolsent stacu he did not know his tirot nome.

# ashes it he was in tho

Duiinican acpubile at tao present time.

the Aresidest

stated he was; that

they were getting prody close to a buttlement wit

tillin

Jand he thought we

had cheunce him out, but angway i had te whole list ade he wanto to be sure

tis y are curenco and that there are nose cho are anow communists because

tac is che ties both the rigat and lett winge wonlo eries ma dory so üne onl

way to carboc mong toe Eresidint, is to ve sure they are not communiate:

the President cincod aucther thing le how are they doing to get rial of tae .

coramuniate whon we do get a governnent. & stated that is going to depend

on the streugth or the one in power.

I told the Presidone sis

mectson with

Who is

golng down do iserto nico wits

user wasn on the Caco eas plane, we have an

/just who is going on to care

lans, wit as to wnother we can get a mieruphon

23, 10 du not kow bougust Case.

: in a house salter than a hotel.

olated one of our Agents is deta

So the aipost in hie ex cahe

was have an opartunity to taii lo

Die PresidGat esker

Put to pas da spit and i detent to men

nut, the Ageat on tac pione will nut be kaoin to

120.06

vee in Paceto aloo, a surveilance will be got on his but it ho stays wton

as us me uaticipate, is slal be daticult to cover crop: the coleghones.

mated there are divo lines operatiny botween Duerto hiso and te Duminican

Epulie end wo have an live lines covered,

The resident inquired as to wucther they had asked me to accerble

„atact curbielo on die andi. crumunet this.

ince tho liaocover sint i stated the only

mes I bave are da the babaz

re Prratient statad that exter they get tho

Classifica

REG- 10

CDS. Categoril

109-12-211 - 3064

MAY 20 1965

IS MAY 21 1965)

JUHiedm (3)

I MAY 2 8 1965 a

MAIL ROO

TELITYPE UNIT

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 210

---

## Page 211

May I%, 1905

....

osandwa for beesrs,, Tolson, Lolaont, Deloach, culivan

/ sovernment in the alternatives are: Let them light it out and kill thousands

and provably the communists would end up in charge; We can go in there aud

try to gee them to agree and go on the conbtitution and let them vote on it in

ud or 40 days, copervice the ciceton and have & vasinot we mutually agreed

upon which I can check apon; then cace we sct it, holp the arcsident with

comic inteligenue peogie to point up wao are communists. He said they ought

to be matins or oncs tho spoak the language and he wanted me to take charge

oi that and to etart right now soging i i were precicent, what I wouis do down

there to get ria of the communets. The Iresident stated i can't be done in

one day, bat that is what he wants for the dominican hepuolic.

I toid the Preeident I had quite & number of Agente, a hundred or s0,

who are exert in the spanian langunge so we have the facilitics that we can do

that, the Eassident asked that I look at the best ones and sce wao it ia; that

it has to be a fellow who can got diong with the now resident woom ne can

trust, to figure mit what I need, how i would set it up, and what & would do

to get set up to go to work on tue communists. & stated i thougt it can be

covered as we do in the south Amerivan countries us we have in some foreign

countries a legal attache attached to the lmoansy and li we have & ronn

irom the buitar atlaibed to the arabnosy es waces herraho, ho cou be the

median through which to advise the resident and seleek the individuals

too ought to be listcd, deported, or put under control. The President asked

I ,,st the results of the check to him as soon as possible on Colonel-cora-

2:56 PM

Whila talring to the Atternsy Coneral on anotber mattor, Ladvised

hima the Prceidest had just calied una vanted a name caccisci, but aleo wanted

mie to pick a squad of kit agento to so to the Dominican legunue when the

now governmont le formed to advise the Fresident on the removal o communists

and getting themi out ci povernment outices.

I uricted the Attorney General on

my cunvernation with the Eresidont. I tole him I was not chusiastle about it,

out since ile wante it dons, I was starting to look into li and trying to line up

titteen or twenty men able to do it. i told the Attorney General I had wanted

him t0 isao in the event the President epcake to him about it.

NW- 65360-Đoeld:32989627-Page 21-1.

---

## Page 212

17, 1935

Giandum for Messrs, Toson

selont; Hckoach, Sullran

c20622228%a2

I also bricied the Attorney General in regard to duai

and the coverage on lacd.

S:05 PM

The Precident called ami stated the name of the individual he

Dad asi0d Le to dicasis a eraduato di the Cenal Zone school ansi bie complete

name was cues bert comandea.

I stated we can chock that quicaly.

The Presidont asked I be sure that I and Admiral labora, bead of

the Contral Intelligence Agenoy, cheel: out because he, the Eresident, did not

want to aurco ca & government and lind 3 Khruenchev as the neac oi it. i

statod I rould checit on the names he had given me iriday.

E asked tue

Provident l Admiral laborn had bsen furnisned the list and he stated he

was not cure but he wanted the two of us to check them cut carefully.

Very truly youreg,

Joha Edgar Hoover

Director

SENI FROM D. O

TIRE

5- 357 M

DATE

BY -

→ 3

NW 65360 Docld:32989627. Page 212

---

## Page 213

OPTIONAL LORM NO. 10g

5010-108

MAY 1802 70110N

GSA, FIN. PIG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVE

MENT

Memorandum

Tulson

!? Beimont

"Moh; -

Ye DeLoach

Cooper

Callahor

Conrud

Felt -

TỚ

MR. SULLIVAN

DATE: 5/17/65

Sovn

FROM

A la Belmon lair

Taven-

cc Mx. Belmont

trotter

Tele. Room.

Mr. Mohr

Holmes -

Mr. Sullivan

Gandy a

Mr. Wannall

LEGAL ATTACHE'S OFFICE,

Mr. D. J. Brennan

mito

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.

"Dayhe Director advised that the president will want the FBi to

a group in the Dominican Republic to advise the President of

Dominican Republic concerning Communists, how to deal with them,

and how to get rid of them.

It is contemplated that we will set up

a Legal Attache's Office, with a group of 20 to 25 men,

fox the purpose

of taking charge of cleaning out communists in the Dominican Govern-

ment and advising the government of those who may try to infiltrate

into the government. This activity would take place first in the

city of santo Domingo, and then extend throughout the country until

all communists have been spotted and the Dominican Government has been

advised.

All of the agents to be sent down snouid ve fucut in Spanish

and ve should select any who have Dominican or Spanish blood, which

will assist them in working inconspicuously with the populace.

Relative

to the Legal Attache, he should be a top man, fully

experienced, as he will be dealing with the President of the

Dominican

Republic and with our Ambassador there.

ACTION:

"In" anticipation or the above, the director desires that we

draw up suggestions for a Legal Attache and for a group of twenty to

twenty-five men who can proceed, when so ordered, to the Dominican

Republic for this purpose.

A copy of this memorandum is being designated for the

Administrative Division so that the Domestic Intelligence Division

and the. Administrative Division can work t

together on

is of the essence

this:

Time

AMDRIG

REC 20

64 - 4503-222

AHB: CSH

• (6)

HEREIN IS UNGI

•DATE 11-15-

gs:

NWV. 63360. Docld:3298962?_ Page 213

NAI.

20

---

## Page 214

RSONAL ATTENTION

LETTER NO. 65-31

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Ins Reply, Please Refer t0

June 2, 1965

WASHINGION, D.C. 20535

File No.

(A) DOMINICAN SITUATION (NATIONALITY GROUP COVERAGE - LATIN

AMERICA) -- For your information, Bureau has established a Legal Attache

int Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, who has already begun to make a

valuable contribution to the over-all efforts of the United States in making

certain that the Dominican Republic does not become another Cuba. If the

United States succeeds in its efforts to keep communists out of the new

Dominican coalition government which is in the process of being formed,

current United States policy in the Dominican Republic could very well

become the established course of action for all other countries in Latin

America threatened with communism.

The responsibilities which have been placed upon the Bureau

in developing intelligence data in the Dominican Republic, as well as in

other Latin-American countries, are not only tremendous but may be the

heaviest and most far-reaching burden the FBI has ever been asked to

assume in uno intelligence ield. To guaratag pur complete success:

teamwork is a must.

Accordingly, first we must do everything possible to assist

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo, in his immediate task of developing

quality sources of sufficient quantity to effect maximum coverage in the

Dominican Republic.

In this regard, each office and Legal Attache must furnish

=" to the Bureau within five days of the réceipt of this letter under the caption

of "DOMSIT" (code word for "Dominican Situation") the following:

(1) Identities of any established sources (former or current)

who are now in the Dominican Republic.

(2) Persons in Dominican Republic known to personnel of

your office who appear to have good source potential.

(3) Identities of any current security sources (regardless of

nationality) who may be available for assignment (temporary or permanent)

in the Dominican Republic if such is considered feasible by Legal Attache,

Santo Domingo.:

64-4503

NOT: RECORDED

•HE JUN 4 1965

DATE 11/20

BO BY_

HEREIN IS UNOLASSIFLTE

ALL. INFORMATION C

mOR16

8JUN 15 1985

NW 65360 Docld:32989627. Page 214

---

## Page 215

Any leads for purpose of checking background of potential sources

for Santo Domingo must receive priority attention and results submitted by

teletype.

In addition to the Dominican requirements placed upon the Bureau,

your attention is directed to over-all need for additional informants and

sources in the Latin-American field. The reputation the Bureau has gained

during recent Dominican crisis is due in large part to the results achieved

in developing Dominican sources through a concentrated informant develop-

ment program over the past several years.

In view of critical state of unrest in Latin America today, each

office should survey its informant coverage in this field. If substantial

numbers of nationals of any Latin-American country reside within the

territory covered by your office, Bureau expects that you will have coverage

sutticient to alert you to exile organizational activities vi politial lature,

..plots to overthrow existing governments, and general intelligence data

Concerning the countries of interest. Informant development in this field

is considered most important and any weaknesses which now exist must be

• overcome promptly by instituting an aggressive informant development

program.

Very truly yours,

John Edgar Hoover

• Director

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 215

---

## Page 216

8808 Do 1880

August 84, $985

Tolson -

¡Belmont _

#she

Loach o

Callahon -

sallivan.

MEMORANDUM ECH MR. TOLSON

MR. BELMONT

MR. DE LOACH

AAL INFORMATION CONTAINES

HEREIN IS UNCLASSITLED

MR. SULLIVAN

DAN (115-C0 BX SPRALIT

& called Admiral Willlam F. Rabori, Director of CIA, and

told him & wanted to pass on to hima a development he may be asked aboud.

& stated, about ten days ago, the President asised my viow of the removal

of my men from the Dominican Ropublie and whether the work we have

been doing down there could be carried on by ClA as eflectively as both

agencies have handled it in the past.

I stated i checked with@anderson

who la in charge of the FEi's

office in the Dominican Republie, and he felt very strongy the fBi wen

could be withdrawn and the CIA personnel carry on. i adviced Admiral

Raborn that I sent this message to the wnite llouse and got word rom

- Marvin Watson that the Fresident indicated no move enoua be made at

this toe and that our man are sille down there.

I advised Admiral Raborn that 3 expect to see the President

this week and i am going to bring this up to see whether he will make a

decision; list we could use those men backs heres and that. & think the

Bituadon is well in hand by CIA personnel. & said & thought the President

might make some inquiry of Admiral Rabort.

Admiral Raborn said he certainly appreciated my calling and

he le delighted with the tine way our folke have gotten glong; that there ia

a Lot of mutual respect. ¡ stated that 1 instructede daderson io let me

now what hla viewe nere and aid not toil him mice; that he way very bist

In priso di she man in charge o1 ine an onice, us men an the stait oi

this difice. Adrired dabora alted they valcome cooperation viu she

FBI lo any and evesy place.

NOT

6 AUG 2, 1965 170 AUG 26 1965

JEH:rm

2MD 665/44.1

DATE

7/24/65

1Lа CER

1 - 1985

MAIL, ROOM

TELETYPE

**WW-65360 Docld:32989627-Page 216

---

## Page 217

Memorandum for Messra. Tolsos, Belmont,

Deloach, and sulima

Auguat 24, 1805

& stated that 1 think we are going to have trouble down there

but I think CIA can bandle it with theis force. He replied that they will

be delighted to have us stay but they certainly appreciate the tact we

may need our people elsewhere. I said we need them in this country

where the riots are occurring; that this la not really our fioid; that l

is CIA a lleld; and that the sooner we get back to our own field, tha

bettor.

I again stated it is very likely the President may apeak to

Admiral Rabora about this asd he thanked me for calling.

Very truly yours,

1&H

John Edgar HoorsE

Director

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 217

---

## Page 218

3:62 22i

ATI. INFORNATION CONTAINER

Copteraber 10, 1€65

MACRAMOON WOR 2AZ.

DOLEON

0

SaNto Duranga

ME. DE LOACH

EUR. SULLIVAN

Facadost Lyndon B. Echnson calle2. Re stated he was worried cocat

th. sination in to Dominicon Roguilio and ashod me how I loit mout it. I

doin him it was my scuing that it is in en avaul mess; that there have boen soverai

peogle who bave beca soloved to be in the Cabinci who are far Econ: being ice

di coozauzist association or dosination and wig they were solected, I did noc leow,

ought the maction dowa these is very critical. I stated I tet wite

Mic songo Duady and Adulral Wilans Rasorn cê the Central intelligence Agency

(Cil, the satan day as to ricter the 3Et could withdraw from the Dottinican

hope-s and zy viow was tuat we coula as CiA is thoroughly qualitiou and has

a good man i i tnere to sarry on the respontbilities and there is 30 need fos

the Was to Ec-cdr. Eftaiod it was cao viev of Admiral Reicra and mysele that

¿ was going to be a mono aná that we would have troable sue some tiras to come

became verdues geople are going baok to the Dominican I public now, such as

dung saunand bis followere, and the former Fresidento who were deposed and

-alo do outical sampaiga vetes is gotog to be hold down there this year,

my treno 2ão gong to ba viäuet outsunate walth are charactoniella of the Latine.

I stand to peace is very entic merican and now thaile

bsen sost cat aud coric concul General at Merid the rebel elemoni,

Which is

alpago stacogly ati-American, wallbe in le aacendancy.

I stated

erosidest

Coccu)is not what one would call a strong many and I think he weans wot and

wustay to do rignt but no is not tao lind cia man nao wid stand ug to his

The Pecsident stated he was not too happy with did and the reports

ho gets icon them and ho Woula lao to seo the Burcau people puil cut until a

govenason is losiod. I stated we wouidn't until be, tho Prectaon,

says c0;

to es I said to curor day, we wold not leave wati the decicion bos boes mane

1

109-13

Miss Bolaics

133

1939P

NU 85360-Docld:32989627 Page 218

• NOT ENCORDED

170 SEP 14 1965

6.

SEP. 14 135.:

---

## Page 219

September 10, 1005

Memorandum for Wassrs, Tolsez, E:laiont, DeLoadh, Sullivan

The President stated that white he jones Adrial Laborn 13 &

wonderit mies, tis is playing for kcope and we can't have a Communiat

Covertunent and we bave so bare somelcdy aloni enouga to stand up sad say

"chis la suspicious, " at cotera. Ine Fresidont stated thoy tell him they bave

an Altorney Coneral veo is quite suspicious. I stated ba is very congerous...

so have in sae Astoracy Geassal position. I stated in the discussion wo sad tas

other day in lin'. Bundy's citics, one motter was bow the investigative setup.

wond be undut the now goverament and they were going to have a ilying squadron

oì micE Worbing directiy fce the Fresidont of 1o. Dominican Hepabile and ten

an intelligence mué which Foule gothor infossntion and a Dominican sational

police. " states I exprussed ray opinion that i thought it was wrong for the

Erosident to hard & lyies squadron which would be nothing morc or loos thaa

a secret police lino Bujito bad who would make just repocts the Presidezi

woad wart againce cortain indiviquals who might not be as bad as me precitect

fel they wore. I union lfelt there stoold be an intelligence unit and that tas

nilenal police should be increased. I statedwe, ai course, would assist in

zuy caining brogram thog might want to set up either dor there or ug bere..

I statou at the present time in the national pollee is one man who waz trained

in our Nationa Acciany and was vary valuble in furnishing us with intertatica

that ve could not have gutico rcia other sources.

The Prostdect aoked it we wore having any trouble wortsing togcites

and i told alra no troule at all. The Fresidont sitos ho had asked me to bo

on tre job to leep the comunists irom taking over this hemisguore and io

serve him and he thought we ought to wait and sui puil oat of the Douinicu...

Repubile until the government has boon soloctod and we sat along further in

this: dor me to toll ag suan down there to roct cut overythine he cas and to ko.

hard end tough us ha caa coà be cura ve gựt tha cf crng don, that hó cia not kiou

That the Euptocratic puople ae doing to soe that fresidonl Godoy tries our

reports and coppodte then. Estated I mderstand tae Attorney Concaal was

recommended by@untot and Bennett.

a cated a

-sage number ca people que draticy back into the Dominicaa "24

mentols wordiew Yors ana 3uami who have beon canou t to past and lose

Eno, are bses is polest lue is the past are colas to run agaio.:

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 219

---

## Page 220

Septerabes 10, 1906

Icisca, Boloni, Deloach, wullivan

The Prentiont stated ve lave to havo an Ankascador who is z

practical felton an. one who endoustanishis jon. i stated ho needca a good,

tough indivicual vue wil de ablo to sind un and domaste the Zoosidesi.

The Presidont arsed, ",2o is L0?" gad tolú too to tainà about that and aiso

anost what we ine dainy and act doing that sauce be dobe, as wo can't lose

End ise road be dalalag with ice nost wock. I told him I moula.

Very truly yours,

J. E. Ho

John Edgar Hoove:

Directos

/ard0/240/00.006 2/259/0: 25206m 02905500044

NW 65360 • Docld:32989627 Page 220

ENT BRO

TIME

516 6N

DATE 910115

---

## Page 221

5010-108

MY 1962801794

GSA-SEN. 18G. CID. 2Y

TINITED STATES GO

RNMENT

Memorandum

TO

: Mr. W. C. Sullivan

fROM: 11r. H. R. Hannall

SUBJECT: OPERATIONS

LEGAL ATTACHE,

-SANTO DOMINGO OFFICE

DATE:

Tolsor. -

DeL.cuch

Mohr _

1 - Mr. DeLoach

Mr. Sullivan;

Casper.

Sailchan

Conrad -

Felt -

Gale —

August 22, 1966

Rosen .

Sullivgh

Taveky

1 - Liaison

Trotter -

Tele. Room

(Nx. Papich)

Holmes.

1 - Foreign Liaisoned -

Unit (Mr. Potocki)

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Griffith

This is to recommend that the Central Intelligence

Agency (CIA) be advised that we have set up a regular Legal

Attache Office in Santo Domingo in view of the President's

desire that the FBI remain in the Dominican Republic ano

thay

Legal Attache, Santo Domingo, be authorized to turn two

informants over to the Agency.

In accordance with the desire of the President and

recommendation of the honorable Marvin watson, special

ASSistant to the Fresident, thai tue iod renain in ine Dominican

Republic, the Director, on 8/2/66, advised the White House

that our

and that henceforth this office will be manned in a manner

statt in Santo Doningo would be reduced to three men l

similar to that of our other Legal Attache Offices. It will not

be an operational office but rather will serve as a strategic

listening post for intelligence data and as liaison with

agencies of the Dominican Republic, as well as other agencies

of foreign governments in that country.

.?In light. of this redirection of effort, we fnstructed

Legal Attache, vanto Domingo, to review his informant coverage

to determine if any of our informants should be made available

to the gency for operation

ega tache has recommender

chatstwo informants, @0M-10/and BOl-12 be turned over to CIA.

DOM-10 has been used principally to develop subversive

data

on Individuals in santiago, Dominican Republic. DOM-12

is

a penetrative-type informant who has gained nembership in

Dominican subversive groups: "Both" öf these sources are

operational and are not the type we would contact in a normal

laison capacity.

Continuation of their services under our

current criteria would be a questionable procedure.

9176504998

REC- 71605- 4503-

63

14 SEP: 22 155

we Enclosure

8-257666

- 64-4123-211 (Legal Attache Informants - Santo Doittngo

134-13781

(DOM-12):

ffice):

FBG: pem/js

AN 2S58281966

Page 221

SST-100

(CONTINUED - OVER)

5°

---

## Page 222

Memorandum V. R. Wannall to W. C. Sullivan

Re:

OPERATIONS

LIGAL ATTACHE, SANTO DOMINGO OFFICE

In the case of DOh-i2, this informant was originally

developed by the New York Office. Legal Attache suggested

the New York Office might have use of informant's services.

This information furnished to New York Office which replied

that in the absense of organized activity informant would be

of no use unless he came to New York with instructions from

Dominican communist groups to reorganize activity. This,

of course, is not a desirable situation.

JEK Act 5'(9)(21(D)

OBSERVATIONS:

We believe Legal Attache, Santo Domingo's recommendation

to turn

even though

both of

these sources are in a position to furnish valuable

intelligence information to us. By making these informants

availablo

we will avoid any possible duplication

or conflict. This matter should be discussed with appropriate

officials by our Liaison Agent in order to insure the Agency

is fully aware of our current status in the Dominican Republic.

JEK Act 5

(9) (2) (D)

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) 1D)

ACTION:

If you approve:

(1) Liaison Agent will advise appropriate CIA

In accordance with the desire of the President that

the FBI remain in the Dominican Republic, we are setting up a

regular Legal Attache Office in Santo Domingo consisting of

three men. This will not be an operational office but rather

will serve as a strategic listening post for intelligence data

and as liaison with agencies of the Dominican Republic, as

well as.other.agencies of foreign governments..in that country.

In connection with this reorganization, we have instructed our

representative in Santo Domingo

BK Act 5 (9) 12) (D)

a 69560 Docld:3290962/ Page 2U

-2--

---

## Page 223

EmoR 16

AT INFORMATION CONTAIULI

HEREIN IS UNCLASSITIO

DATE 1I15-00 3Y5P2Am/4T6

June 20, 1968

BY LIAISON

Mr. Jackson

Liaison

Hir. Rachner

Mr. Potocki -

Honorable Idar Rinestad

Deputy Under Secretary for Administration

Department of State

Washington, D. C.

Dear ir. Rimestad:

40/74/68

You have previously been advised oi reductions

In FBI personnel overseas which were made in response to

the wishes of the President.

In a further effort to

comply with the desire of the President, a lave decide

to reduce our staîf in Santo Domingo by ore Special Agent

and one clerk.

This will eliminate one position in GS-]4

and one position in GS-8.

You may be sure that I will continue to give

this matter close scrutiny with a view to effecting further

economies whenever such action can be taken without impairing

the

discharge of our responsibilities.

• Sincerely yours,

REP:bsc-trec

(6)

send

REC I1

64-4503-422

EX 106

NOTE:

4. JUN 26 1958

Above

personnel cuts approved by Directoria

memorandum Hannall to Sullivan, 5/17/68, captioned "Operations -

•Santo Domingo,

" whereby Legat,

Santo Domingo, was instructed to

recommend by 6/22/68 personnel

to be transferred.

Transfers

now under way.

Folson

coach

ishr

l: 3hop

Harper.

slishan

44.19.!

GARY

68 JUL 2

1968

MAT ROON CON

I TELETYPE UNITE

63,60

Docld:32989627 Page 223

---

## Page 224

n-er.----

-TTE...

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDER'.L BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

GO LTR

EX LHM.

• Memo

• Report

dated —

6/34 75

u.S.

senate Select Committee to Study

GOVE

Cantion of Document:

Operations with Respect to Intelli-

gence activities: Re: Documents pertaining to

the "Huston Plan", Cointelpro, and other Practice

andgiRnagrass;

Other Specific FBI Practices and

Prograndy:

Date: _ 8-8-75

Received by:

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

+1116

ALT, INFOTENTION CONTRE

_BX SP-2

ALM 71G

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 224

---

## Page 225

TE: SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO: Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

term.

If a document was made available

review but not

I DOCUMENT |

so note.)

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW

I TESTIMONY

TOTHER

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

2. DATE PROVIDED

6/21/75

4.

DENTIAT, N provid do suiptive data for documentsi sive name or identification number of briefer,

Memorandun and enclosures

5. Wise sPoNs verbal sequete of (itee).

initiative, supposed eternal request, other.

SSC lotter 5/14/75, Appendic C, Fust IXI, Ites 28

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

U, C,

codewords-

S

7. Is unde feet emphase late key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed

are

#MDR16

GOINTELFRO

/IT, 7NP

Incelligence collection, foreign

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

2: 10110100 SP=2 ALm/aTE

Various commnications pertaining to the origins and conduct

of the EBt investigation in the Doulaican Repablic in 2965.

Other documents also ribuitted to show reduction in staft in

ingust, 1965 and to show the change in our mission in the

Doninican Republic in fugist, 1965. legel Attachets

Office in the Dominican Republic was closed in April, 1969.

62-116395

FUK: Emk:

(4)

IN CONNECTION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS YELLOW

CLASSIFY AS

APPROPRIATE

-woe

379| (6-75)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 225

---

## Page 226

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

"FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and

showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters it appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 "Page 226

---

## Page 227

Assoc. Dir...

FEDERAL BUKCAU OF INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SA

N

AUG 0 4 1975/

TELETYPE

Dep.-A.D.-Aăm.

•Dep.:A.D.-Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv. -

4830 PM URGENT 8/04/75 ACH&EJG

Ident.

Inspection

TO DIRECTOR NR 323-94

Intell. -

Laboratory

FROM LEGAT LONDON 694-417)

Plan.

& Eval. -

Spec, Inv. -

ATTENTION: HELGESON, INTD

Legal Coun

Telephone Ril

• to

OSENATE

Director See's

SELECT COMMITTEE

MR. HELGESON

REBUTEL 7/29/75.

4026

TEN

REBUTEL INDICATING MARK GITENSTEIN SENIOR STAFF MEMBER, SENATE

SELECI COMMITEE, DESIRED TO VISIT WITH BRITISH OFFICIALS REGARDING

DOMESTIC SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS. CHIS MATTER HAS BEEN TAKEN UP

WITH BRITISH SECURITY SERVICE (11I-5) WHO HAVE ALSO HEARD FROM THEIR

REPRESENTATIVE, JOHN PARKER.](5)

[THIS REQUEST PLACES MI-S IN A DIFFICULI POSITION BECAUSE OF THE

SENSITIVITY OF SECURITY: INVESTIGATIONS IN. THE UNITED KINGDOM (UK),

AND BEFORE ANY DECISION CAN BE MADE, MI-S NEEDS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION](S)

WHICH SHOULD REACH LEGAI MORNING OF AUGUST 6, 1975. SPECIFIC INFORM

ATION REQUIRED AS FOLLOWS:.

THE EXACT SIATUS OF GITENSTEIN, I.E., IS HE CONSIDERED A U.S.

GOVERNIENI OFFICIAL OR A TEMPORARY POLITICAL APPOINTEE BY THE COM-

MITTEE. ALSO, WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE VISIT; IS THIS VISIT AN

OFFICIAL REQUEST OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT; HAS GITENSTEIN BEEN

10110100

6

ATTi INFORMADION CONTAIZA

HERFIX IS UNSLASSINIIO REGIT

WERE SHOPE ORHORWISE.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 227

EX-101

REC-163-114375

17 AUG 8 1975

017758568577

---

## Page 228

..

* ;

PAGE IWO

INSTRUCIED BY THE COMMIITEE TO VISIT THE UK OR IS HE ACIING ON HIS

OWN. ALSO, WHAI EXACILY IS GITENSTEIN WANTING TO KNOW, I.E., WHAT

TYPE OF ACTIVITY IS INVESTIGATED IN THE UK, OR HOW IT IS INVESTIGA-

TED .

ANSWERS TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS WITH PRECISE DETAILS AS POSSIBLE

WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED BY MI-S, IN VIEW OF THE ANSWERS, MI-S

MAY DESIRE TO HAVE AN OFFICIAL OF THE BRITISH FOREIGN OFFICE SPEAK

TO HIM RATHER THAN ONE OF THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES. NO CONTACT HAS. YET

BEEN MADE WIIH THE POLICE AS IT WAS FELT PROPER TO DEFER TO MI-5

FIRST - (5)

END

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 228

---

## Page 229

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

OPMONAL FORM NE. 10

50:0-103

MAY 4962 EDITION

GSA GEN, XEG, NO, 27

UNITED STATES GO

RNMENT

' Memorandum

Mr. McDermott

J.

Farringtone!

DATE:

August 1, 1975

FmpR16 10125100

C!.

REQUEST BY U. S. SENATOR WALTER F. MONDALE,

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE MEMBER TO REVIEW

HIS FBI FILES

Assoc. Dir.-

Dap. AD Adm. -

Dap. AD liv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp, Syst. -

Ext. Affairs.

Files & Com. E

Gen. inv. -

Ident. -

Laboratory

Legal Coun.

Plan. & Eval.

Spoc. Inv. -

Training

Tolephone Rm. -

Diractor See'y

On July 21, 1975, the Attorney General determined

there should be a disclosure of material in the files,

with certain exceptions (for details see J. B. Adams to

by various Senators on

their FBI files") •

On July 29, 1975, Sénator Mondale; his Legislative

Assistant, David Aaron and William O'Connor, Deputy Assistant

Attorney General, were with James B. Adams, Assistant to the

Director, Deputy

Associate Director in his office from

8:05 a.m. to 10:50 a.m.

During this time Senator Mondale

reviewed the following FBI material pertaining to himself.

60484

1 - Mr. Adams

1 - Mc. McDermott

1 - Mr. Farrington

1 - Mr. Wannall

Attention: Mr. W. Cregan

Enclosures

(7N018

DRI: evp

(7)

ENCLOSURE

AECISECIURECTO

ORIGINAL FILED IN

NOT RECORDED

46 AUG 6 1975

OLE AUURDUM PAGES 4 & 5

mw 83s8o 46E1d.:3519657 Page 229

---

## Page 230

.23

1975

I,.

Sures

have received the following files from

the Federal Bureau of Investigation today,

7/23/75

on the following subject:

Senator Walter I. Mondale

19411604-89

9-54759

9-52508

19-44-386

(scalesmia)

: 51-11800-53,55

+61-3178-4490

+ +2-89 475-55912

Received frow

M Conson,,

7/241755

b +1-1982581p2

+@o5-10828-52197,5032,7013

64-99890-307

605-14537-735

4055+5263-742673694246)

+5+45873-385, 594, 435

+5- 84-995-55

#5-145594-5

(5)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 230*

---

## Page 231

134-1676

+ 159-4-33-16

100-455-198-42

:366174-154)(5)

+05-25-263-1415765)

105-40461-3197(5)

62-110785-48

+92-15336-11

+941-25536-43

+100-4545655316;463

+05-138938-2165)

105-141346-3715

#105-202-547-18

+157-6-43-24, 55

le o-+51357-92(5)

(05-80276-12565)

05-25263-7044,T049, Ili Tia4, Tai

1395, T410, 7512, 7514

+05-40461-4413 (5)

(s)

+95-43815-1575347586, 584, 586, 391)

105-74-565-275

105-138941-142;

105-195567-84

1105-21-8145-59

-

3-

_NW/ 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 231

---

## Page 232

J. C. Farrington to Mr. McDermott Memo

REQUEST BY U.S. SENATOR WALTER F.

MONDALE, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE MEMBER

TO REVIEW HIS FBI FILES

In above file references, we had

seven documents

containing masked out portions. As these masks will be

removed prior to replacing in our files, a Xerox of the

pertinent portion of the respective documents have been

made for record purposes and attached to this memorandum.

Concerning 105-188989 Department of State

letter to FBI dated April 10, 1969, Senator Mondale

advised he had recevied a copy of this letter from the

State Department.

Concerning 62-110783-68 report of SAA Dale E.

Berglund dated March 10, 1966, at Minneapolis captioned

"MILES WELTON LORD; United States Attorney District of

Minnesota, Administrative Inquiry - Bribery," Mr. Adams

mentioned

to Senator Mondale there were privacy considera-

tions concerning this report and Senator Mondale limited

his review of this document to information pertaining

to himself

set forth on pages 35b and 36.

ACTION: For Information.

eleho

gertation

pur

-

ADDENDUM: J. B. ADAMS: ams

7/31/75

Subsequent to the meeting, David Aaron advised that the

Senator requested to be advised as to why certain serials of sensitive

coverage (technical coverage on foreign embassies) seemed to end in (5)

1970 and I advised him that in recent years our indexing procedures in

such matters have not called fox indexing the name of a Congressman ox

(5)

it has not been indexed los -1

retrievabitity.

, ==1.7*

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 232

---

## Page 233

Memorandum for Mr. McDermott

Re: REQUEST BY U. S. SENATOR WALTER F.

MONDALE, SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

MEMBER, TO REVIEW HIS FBI FILES

The Senator raised a question concerning a folder on the

Consumers Advisory Council, of which he was a member (62-108230-1)

and inquired how we came into possession of this particular report. I

determined that this report had been sent to Mr. Hoover in September,

1962, by Richard Berlin, President of the Hearst Corporation, as he

felt Mr. Hoover would be interested in reading the report. I advised

Mr. Aaron that the report had been sent to Mr. Hoover by a friend of

his in the newspaper field.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 233.

---

## Page 234

"runomit the following in

•Via.

1)

FBI

026

Date: 3/6/63

('Type in plaintext or code)

(Priorits)

DIRECTOR, FBI (105-40461)(5)

SAC, WEO (105-13225))

(C)

(S)

LYGUNT BRONIAREK

IS-PO

10/25/0077 m0216

(00: r0)

DECLASSE CA

Enclosed for Bureau are five copies of LIM dated

and captioned as above.

winine

;..)

ORSE

KOM

I who voluntarily furnished the information to sa

"BLERT I. LIE, WEO. She advised the Senator told hez the in-

formation which appears in the Ifi.

She also stated 3RCNI.JK

nay have been introduced to the Senator then he visited has

¿fica on one occasion but BRONARIX hardly knew the Senato

(By saquest)

1-T22 ka

Second informant is we

455- S

third informant is CG 6417-5.

115

IHy has been classifiad "Secret-No Föreign Dissemina-

cion" in order to protect ur 456-5*,

a sensitive souice 0-

continuing value.

In addition it. is so classified to

comply

with the

"Secret" classification accorded CG 6417-57(5)

The informant Meno has been classified "ConficiencaT

since

it reveals Bureau's

interest in a representative of an

uSficial foreign agency.S,

Sureau (Dac. 5)

2-

T23

/ENCLOSURE

(5)

01-925-301793 C791

U":

2271923

1F9 MAR 13 16Ü

Sant

Pera

NW 65360 Docld:32989627* Page 234

:: Change

ORIGINAL FIOT

---

## Page 235

-FD-36 (Rev, 5-22-64)

F B. I

Date:

10/13/70

Transmit the following in

Via

AIRTEL

0125/00 #m DR/E

(Type in plaintexi or code)

ME NASIFIED BY SPALM ITE

DECLASSIEY OIL 20146.

_(Priority)

TO :

DIRECTOR, FBI (105-1082871(5)

FROM:

SAC, WO [205-524) S)

EMBASSY. OF ISRAEL-

PES-

IS - ISRAEL

(00: WFO)

(5)

Enclosed for the Bureau are eight copies of an

LIM, dated and captioned as above. Informant mentioned

•in LHM is(WF 568-S*]) IHM has been classified "Secret - No

Foreign Dissemination"' and has been marked

A Mr.

Mi. Moti.

21i2

"Ir. C.

7Ie.

Cir

8í2.

Mr.

Galo

Mr. R030n

Mr.

Pav-!

Mr. Walters.-.-

"Ir. Sagar;

Pole. Ronn

Aliss It.

TIlss Gan7:

(5)

10/15/70

30022

_' REG TI

61244?9

1105-/2122=511.2

(5)

OCT 20 1970

Bureau (Enc. 8)

1 • WrO

CAM:nsT

(3)

105-10878

2198

MARKED

setti

- coved:

special Agent in Charge

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 235

M

Per.

3. 5, GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1969 0-346-899 611°

---

## Page 236

FBI

Date:

6/9/70

Transmit the following in

10/25/00 17 m0R16

(Type in plaintext or code)

AIRTEL

Via

CLASSIFIED BY SPRALM MIO

DECLASSIFY ON: 23X_,6

(Priority)

TO:

FROM:

DIRECTOR, T 205-1082560) REP 252

SAC, PO 205-520,53

aut

EMBASSY OF ISRAEL

WASHINGTON, D.C.

(S)

IS - ISRAEL

• B.

(00: WFO)

ORiGiNA

mARKED

105-10826-

2032

Enclosed for the Bureau are eight copies of an

LHM,

dated and captioned

as above.

Informant mentioned

in LHM is WF 568-S*; LHM has been classified "Secret -No.

Foreign Dissemination' and has been marked

athü:1/227

Concerning SAUL KOHTER (ph), mentioned in LHM,

informant learned that he gave his telephone number as

N. 225-3135.

A call to this number elicited the reply,

office of the Republican leader" whtch may indicate that

KOHLER is in the office of Senator HUGH §COTI, Pennsylvania (S)

Case confits

CIA

Bureau End.

6/52235 ..

CAM: nSI

joe.

JIM Z2 1970

(5)

"Appro

Sperit fini in Charge

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 236

Sent -

Per

5, COVERNMENT PRETER DEFICE 1959 - it aga

---

## Page 237

F B !

• Date:

5/27/70

Avia

Transmit the following in

AIRTEL

BERTHA,

(Priority)

#m De16 10/25/00

CLASSIFIEDBY SP-ZALM /716

DECLASSIEY ON: 25X.1, 6

TO:

DIRECTUZ, FBI [105-1032851(5)

FRUÍ:

EMBiSSY OF ISRAEL

sae, +7o 205-3218 C85

MASHINGTON, D. C.

REC ER

Ice artil 1266719

- AAG/ISD 2TRO

2.HML

00: HEO)

.=. ..

(s) Enclosed for the Bureau are eight copies of an Illi,

dated and captioned as above.

Infornant mentioned in Ifti is

-Wr 568-5*; LIT has been classified "Secret-No Foreign Dissemi-

anation" and has been marker.k

610

A call to telephone 225-4551 received the reply,

Misenate press" which could possibly indicate that the teleg

mentioned in Illit is in fact Justi

sinthe columnist. (s)

Informant has previously furnished infornation in

Adicating that ANON SPrayik is employed in the Economic defice,

Embassy of Israel. (5)1"

. Bureau (Enc. S)ENCipSURu

cham is in 1205, 4605 3, i finite

(3.

/welling to LBie2105-02011413

1970

CONFIDENT

=199

NAT. DO

SEC,

Sent -

_ M

Per -

HE S, GOVERNMENT PHINTING OFFICE: 1969 A - 910-008 6111

(5)

Mir!

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 237

---

## Page 238

TO

UNCLASS,

8/M/80

2/28/90

SUBJECT:

US

AST INFORMATION CONTAI

HEREIN IS UNELASSTTE

WEBRE SHOWN OTHERWISE

GSA GEN. REG- NO. 27

UNITED STATES GO:

RNMENT

Memorandum

10/25/00

DIRECTOR, FBI

CLASSIFIED BY SP-2 ALM)716

DECLASS. / 011:

1,6

SAC, NFO (105-65677)

DATE:

7/22/65

01-58-43

VALERIA (MIN)

CIS

BATOR&WICZ

(00:

- R (VISITOR TO THE USSRD (S)

MP)

6741

ReWFOlet dated 7/22/65, in captioned matter..

, advised SA DONALD A.

BRUMITT of the following developments in connection with

subject's status'since BOX was Interviewed on 7/29/65. (5-1)(5)(0)

Prior to departing for the USSR, BATOREWICZ

was advanced $1,000 for travel and living expenses. Upon her

return she was asked to repay this money... She was

unable to

do so since she had spent the money during her travel in Europe.

Upon being advised that the funds must be repaid, she became

quite upset and pointed out that she has been put to considerable

inconvenience. (5-D (8(0

On 7/21/65, Mr. EMOND learned that BATOREYICZ. had

contacted Congressman JOSEPH-KARt and Senator WALtE MORDAL,

both of minnesota and related the jull tacts o. her employment

with USIA and subsequent abrupt recall from the Soviet Union

along with comments

being expected to repay the $1,000

As related by Mr. EMOND, Congressman KARTH and Senator

MONDALE have both contacted USIA and requested all details. He

said it looks as if there will be a "considerable stink" about

the matter. (S-)S (U

Mr.. EMOND said there has been,

no mention made of any

FBI Luterest in BATOREVICZ. (5-D{E). (0)

Above furnished for information of Bureau and

Minneapolis.

REG

nearly

_2-Bureau

2-dlinneapolis (R$)

1-170

EX 5 10%.

18

JUL 23 1965

(s)

DAB: HUB

1715)

M/23

Bicy ElS. Sarings Bonds Regular! on the Payroll Savings Plan

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 238

---

## Page 239

FD-36 (Re3. 5-22-64)

JU

F B 1

ITISMIS:

NEe Dosti

Transmit the following: in

Date: 3/6/68

(Type in plaintext or code)

•Via _

_ AIRIET.

Arm BR 15-10/25/00

GLASSIEED BYSP 2 ALM/11K6

(Priority)

alr. Jord

did. Truer.

Tele, linoin

Aliss Guniy

TO :

RU?"

FROM:

SAC, WEO

TEXCMUNE BRONIARIK

(s)

IS-PO

(00: WFO)

(105-13225)

SIFIED

(C)

SECRET

422

VE CODER IIGS

2. p. 3

Enclosed for Bureau are five copies of LHM dated

and captioned as above..:

20 MURDERED BEDLAT.

"en.

who voluntarily furnished the information to Sil

DELBERT'E. LIE, UTO.

She advised the Senator told her the in-

fornation which appears in the LHi.

She also stated BRCMI.IREK

may have been introduced to the Senator wen he visited her

office on one occasion but BRONIAREK hardly knew the Senator.(S)

(By request)

Stat, CIRI REN

Second informant is WE

• 456-5*

Reu

DATE FORE!.

3-1-65

NOW

FARIY.

заком куйсілок 2-0-і.

Third informant is CG 6417-5, (5)

continuing value.

In addition it is so classified to comply

with the

"Secret" classification accorded (CG 6417-5, (5)

The informant Meno has been classified "Confidential"

since it reveals Bureau's interest in a representative of an

official foreign agency. (S

3 - Bureau (Enc. 57

2 ..

(9) 1

EX. 109

0-700-994790 (9TTeT

(TEC 18

as die i.

0, 411440 7167

Seid!

.M

fern

NW 65360* Docld:32989627 Page 239

---

## Page 240

FBI

• Date:

2/13/70

Transmit the following in

Via

AIRTEL

# Mo R16 10135/00

(Type in plaintext or code)

CLASSIFIED DY: SP-2ALM./716

DECLASSIRY CS:

(Priority)

TO :

DIRECTOR, FBI (105-74565)

SAC,

WFO (105-28204) (p*)

BORIS IT.

DAVYDOV

IS - R: (SOVEMB)

(00: NFO)

..•

ST

R

Enclosed for the Bureau are 5 copies of an LHM,

captioned and dated as above, and classified "Confidential"

as it reveals the Bureau's investigative interest in an

official of a foreign diplomatic establishment.(5)

D:"' The individual tho furnished Information contained

in enclosed LAM is ANDREW GYORGY,.

who was interviewed by

SA ALBERT E. WATTERS, JR. on 2/11/70. (5)

However, he is characterized therein as "an Individual who

volunteered information to the FBI but requested that his

identity be concealed" in order to avoid the impression

that he is operating under the guidance and direction of

the FBI.

REG 14

105-11565-2

As set forth in enclosed

LHM,

GYORGY furnished

information indicating DAVYDOV was

aware of specific

questions asked Anbassador BEAM in

a glosperdoor brieting (S

C2- Bureau (Enco 5)

HEO

(s) [1- 105-87252) (GYORGY)

AFW:logru

AGENCY LE

DT:

(4)

777T

CO/ SSIFIED

FROM

€

Aa santiá

IVz 0/2EX, J0668

(s)

Per

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 240

Pinald

---

## Page 241

d.

CODE

TELETYPE

URGENT

REC 1(32-114 395 5/2-

8/5/75

TO LEGAT LONDON

I-Legal Counsel Office

(Attn: Mr. Daly)

FROV DIRECTOR FBI

1- Foreign Liaison Section Derrid

1-Mir. W. O. Cregar

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

1-Mr. H. E. Helgeson

REURTEL AUGUST FOUR LAST.

GITENSTEIN IS NOT A U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL. HE IS A

FULL TIME STAFF MEMBER EMPLOYED BY SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE.

HE HAS BEEN INSTRUCTED BY THIS COMMITTEE TO CONTACT APPROP-

RIATE OFFICIALS IN UK TO SEEK DESIRED INFORMATION. HE WILL HAVE

WITH HIM LETTER OF INTRODUCTION FROM CHAIRMAN OF SENATE

SELECT COMMITTEE. HE IS ONLY INTERESTED IN WHAT BRITISH DO

IN "VERY GENERAL" FASHION AS TO THEIR HANDLING OF SUBVEREIVE

ACTIVITIES INVESTIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPARING WITH

FBI INVESTIGATIONS OF SIMILAR MATTERS. GITENSTEIN DESCRIBED

ATI INTORMATION CONCATIES

XX OXILISSYTONA SI NIGERE

IT AS AN "ACADEMIC INQUIRY" AND IS NOT SEEKING SPECIFIC FACTS ON

ANY INVESTIGATIONS.

FOR INFO LEGAT, GITENSTEIN IS CLEARED FOR ACCESS TO

Assoc. Dir..

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp, Syst.

Ext. Affairs —

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

HEH:enm

(6)

amon

FEDERAL BUREAU GE

INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

Inspection -

Intell.

Laboratory -

Legal Coun. _

2UE 0 5. 1975

Plan. & Eval. -

SPain 9 AUG 1 4 1975

[EMETYPE

MAIL ROOM [

TELETYPE UNIT I

NW S9560 Docld:32989627 Page 241

NOTE: By teletype 7/28/75 Legat, London, was advised

Mark Gitenstein, Senior Staff Member, Senate

Select Committee, desired to contact appropriate

British officials for general briefing concerning

their handling of domestic security investigations.

Legat in referenced teletype posed certain questions

raised by Ml-5/concerning Gitenstein and the pur-

pose of his visit. (S)

/

---

## Page 242

TELETYPE TO LONDON

RE: SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TOP SECRET INFORMATION.

IF AT ALL POSSIBLE YOU SHOULD SUTEL BE FORE

TWELVE NOON AUGUST SIX ANY ARRANGEMENTS YOU HAVE

BEEN ABLE TO FINALIZE. IN ABSENCE OF COMMUNICATION

FROM YOU GITENSTEI WILL BE ADVISED TO CONTACT YOU

UPON HIS ARRIVAL. IN LONCON.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 242

2-

---

## Page 243

The Attorney Ceneral

July 30, 1975

Dircotor, FEL

VALTED FINTRE COMAIN EELECT COMLITTEE

ON HTTELLICENCE ACTIVIZIGE (FEC)

Thic is in responce to SEC letter dated July 24, 1975,

requesting a list of all Special Agents assigned to the New York: City

area in the mid-1960's who had the curname Kehoe and requesting the

unit to which they zere assignol as zell as thair eurrent aldeseece.

Alached for your approval and forsanling to the Commistoo

ic the original of a memorandum which constitutes our response to

this request. & copy of the memorandum is keing provided for your

records.

• Enclosures (2)

1.

62-116395

1. - The Leguty Attorsey Caneral

Attentioz: Me. I.. William O'Coanor

Special Coincel for

Intelligenes Coordination

REC-1

42-1232-511

N: DCT: pms

(10)

2 - Mr. Mintz (Sent Direct)

(1 - Mr. Hotis)

1 - Mr. Wannall (Sent Direct)

1 - Mr. Walsh (Sent Direct)

1 - Mr. Midkiff (Sent Direct)

EX 101

SX; AUG 13 1975

#MORIG

....

:::10-10=00-

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm.

Based on memo Burns to Walsh dated 7-29-75; DCT:pms

Dep. AD inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

NOTE: The response nas been coordinated with Intelligence Division and

Comp. syst. it approved will be hand carried by Mr. P. V: Daly to Mr. Michael

Fit. afair, Shaheen, Jr., of the Deputy Attorney General's Office.

Gen. Inv. -

Ident..

Inspection -

Intell. -

Laboratory

ENCLOSURE

PLM

Plan. & Evol. _

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

egal Counjay l

elephone Rit

AUG 1 41975

Director Sec'y

MAIL ROOM I

TELETYPE UNIT

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 243

71?

..is

G7O 954-545

---

## Page 244

62-116395

for dissemi

not

request and

your

limited to official proceedings by

unuuthorized person

disclosed to

FBI,

in response

..t, 110,.

preparos

Co: mit'.

??.:

marioal

This document

nation ontside

gour Cumillet oni "

expres

nel without the

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dep. AD Inv.

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

NU.

Comp. Syst._

DCT:pms (9)

Ext. Affairs -

2 - Mr. Mintz

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

(1 - Mr. Hotis)

Ident.

1 - Mr. Wannall

Inspection -

Intell. -

1 - Mr. Walsh

Laboratory u

1 - Mr. Midkiff

Plan. & Eval. -

Spoc. Inv. .

Training

Legal Coun. -

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

TELETYPE UNIT I

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 244

July 30, 1075

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT CONTITTEE

TO STUDY COVEENLIENTAL OPERAIIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLICENCE ACTIVITIDS (§SC)

RE: / REQUET FOR IDENTITIES AND

ADDRESSES OF SPECIAL AGENTE

WITH SURNAME BEHOE ASSICNED

NEW YORK CITY AREA IID-1960's

Reference is made to the letter from captioned committee

dated July 24, 1975, which requested a list of all Special Agents

assigned to the New York. City area in the mnid-1060's who had the

surname

Tehoe and requested the unit to which they were assigned

as well as their current address.

Pursuant to your request, set forth below are the names

and cusiness addresses of the two Special Agents of the FBI with

Fumame

Kchoe who were employed in the New Yori: City area in

the mid-1000's. Eeth were assigned to the investigation of Eoviet

espionage matters and toth are curzently special Agents of the TBI.

Francis Joseph Kehoe

#MDRIG

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Gateway I, Varket Street

Newark, New Jersey 97101

SPAALM HE.

10l1a/00.

James Fatrick Kehoe

Federal Eureau of Investigation

201 East 69th Etreet

New York, New York 10021

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 1O AG

ENCLOSURE/

per

TIM

540 93.396

---

## Page 245

-----=

-. -

--

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ULTR

EXI LAM

[ Memo

• Report dated 7/30/75

Caption of Docate Select Connittee: Re Request for

Identities and Address of SAs

with surname "Kehoe" assigned NYC area mid-$960s

Richard I. To

i Date: 1

8/7/75

Received by:

Return this receipt to the Intelligence Division, FBI

.. ENTORNATION COMIN

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 245

---

## Page 246

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

FROM:

TO:

Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

". Hou revyin torock ransmitiate to moto, a document was made available

3 DOCUMENT 1

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW, TESTIMONY /OTHER

2. DATE PROVIDED

7/30/75

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

1. IDENTIFICATION (provide descriptive data for documents; give name or identification number of briefer,

interviewee, testifier and subject)

Memorandun

numberiative, response te formal request,

SSC letter 7/24/75

6. CLASSIFICATION OF

INFORMATION (enter

Codeword TS

U

". Ma under enterore possee key words from the list provided separately;

if key words not listed are

#MOR 16

Intelligence collection - domestic

1:13:

8. SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

Setting forth nones and business address of two Special

tgents of the EBI with surnane "Kahoa" who vera employed

In the New York City area in the mid-1960's

62-216395

FMK: Emk

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO THE CENTRAL, COMMUNITY INDEX

IN CONNECIION WITH SENSTUDY 75

TREAT AS YELLOW

5, No 8

379 | 16-751

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 246

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

---

## Page 247

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Conmunity

matters it appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

in a, ca

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 247

---

## Page 248

SECNET

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATICN

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

291975

TELSI

YPE

1010100 m

MDRIS

Assoc.

Dir.

Dep.-A.D.-Adm

Dep.-A.D).-1:av-

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Sist

Ext. Affairg

Files & Com

Gen. Inv. ...

Ident.

Inspect at!"

Intell.

K:

Labcrat ty

Plan. & Sval.

Spcc. lav.

Training

Legal Colin.

Telephone Roh

Dieser Sury

NR

006 PH PLAIN

633 PM 7-29-75 NITEL MCA

TO :

FROM:

SENSTUDY - 7

BUREAU

PHILADELPHIA (62-0-23222)

SA JOHN MAICHER, OPERATIONS OFFICER, DEFENSE INVESTIGATIVE

SERVICE, TELEPHONE 755-4012, TELEPHONICALLY ADVISED THAT

ROBERT THWEAT, U.S. NAVY COMMANDER (RETIRED) NOW MANAGER,

FIDELITY BANK, WYNNEWOOD, PA., TELEPHONE MI-2-2990, HOME NUMBER

L0-7-1739, RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM RELIABLE SOURCE THAT A

DOCUMENT WAS STOLEN FROM SENATOR CHURCH'S COMMITTEE.

THIS

DOCUMENT ALLEGEDLY CONTAINS INFORMATION OF A DEROGATORY NATURE.

CONCERNING SENATOR HENNY JAGXSONE

SOURCE STATED THIS DOCUMENT

12-78-88

COPIED AND PASSED TO THOSE OPPOSING JACKSON.

Classified hy SPI At/EM

NO ACTION IS BEING TAKEN ON THE ABOVE, UACB.

Declassily on: BADB

END

6

ORIGINAL, FILED AN

62-116395-

NOT RECORDED

UG 14 1975

n/301i5

All duper,

...

arreste

Turent's parvice,

anility y

NU 6A380U60L1431975627 Bage P48 H

ALY 15:0522

FAREIN

!:..

EXCE?:

OTHERTISE

INTAINED

---

## Page 249

......

FOI/PA 4_293 030

APPEAL #

CIVIL ACT • *

E. 0. $12356

DATE 12-19-88 INITIALS GIM

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 249

---

## Page 250

175

il.

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COLMITTEE

TO SIUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERAFIONS WITH

RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

2 - Mr.

J. A. Mintz

(J.

B. Hotis)

July 25, 1975

1 - Mr. W. V. Cleveland

1-

Mr. W. R. Wannall

1-

Mr.

W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. R. L. Moore

#MDR16

+10l0100

SP2ALM)1G

?

collection, analysis, use, and dissemination of organized

crime intelligence and a

second request related to what extent

have conmunications between the White House and the FBI or

other agencies under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General

bypassed the Attorney General and to what extent should such

communications be channeled through the Attorney General. I/

In response to the first matter, on June 25, 1974,

I testiried berore the FBI oversight subcommittee of the

Senate Judiciary Committee that the Bureau has "no statutory

authority to collect intelligence per sel but that it operates

under the general umbrella of 28 U.S.C. 533 (3), which

authorizes the Attorney General to appoint officials "to

conduct.. investigations regarding official matters...as may

be directed by the Attorney General," A listing of

any

airectives issued by the Department or the Attorney General

with respect to organized crime should be available in the

oftice of the Assistant Attorney Goneral, Criminal Division,

Department of Justice.

- 5/0

the organized crime field are aimed at one ultimate objective:

prosecution.

AUG 13 1975

Assoc. Dir. _

During the course of our investigation Or fury sezal

Dep. AD Adm. hoodluns and the various criminal syndicates operating through-

spiri. out the United States, ve naturally acquire considerable data

Admin_ regarding the structure of the organized undervorld,

Comp. Syst. identities of lts principal leaders, the extent of its in-

Featom. fluence, lts primary sources of income, its payoffs to corrupt

Gen.iv. Officials, and the operations of its vast communications networks.

Inspection.

ntell. — RIM:mam

Laboratory

lan. & Eva

(20) 0a0

ORIGINAL A

NE COPY DE

-AFTORNEY

OVC

_egal Coun.

Finon 2 9 AUG 1 419/5

Telephone Rm. -

Director See'y _

MAIL ROOM L

TELETYPE UNIT O

• 4013

GPO: 1975 0 - 569-920

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 250

---

## Page 251

The Attorney General

lost of this infornation is obtained fron paid

informants, Iron other law enforcement officors, from alert

Control and Safo Strects ict of 1968.

Hone of it, however, is intelligence for intelligence's

sako. The experionco of the FBI over the years has shown that

criminal syndicates ozist for the sole purpose of conducting

illegal operations anù thut anyone belonging to then may

reasonably be presumed to be engaged in one or more of those

activities. Thereiore, our investigations of the organiaca

underworld are not aimed at devcloping genoral nonspecific

data but at establishing which crininal violations its nembers

are chgaged in and then proving these violations in a court

of law.

obviously, not every case opened, every dead lollocd.

or overy bit of intormation reccived is going to wind up ir

Federal court.

On the contrary, much of this material relates

to offenses outside the investigativo jurisaiction of the

When such is the case, ve immediatoly uiscominato tho

incornation to the appropriate federal, state, or local agoncy.

is a result, intormation uncovorou by the FBI

during the past

live years

alone has enable the recipient agencies to make

more than 17,000 organized crime arrests; confiscate over

1151,000,000

worth of illicit rugs and narcotics, $9,000,000

worth of cash, property, weapons, and wagering paraphernalia,

and 6,000,000 worth of

counterfolt bills; and assecs tax

liens against 19,000, 000 worth of property arising out of

Fedoral gambling casos.

In addition, a considerable portion of the organized

crime intelligonce information LovelOped by the FBI 15 fOr-

warded to the various Feácral strike Forcos coordinating

racket investigations throughout the country and to the

Criminal Division of the Departnent, which has entered this

information in its computerized data bank called "Racketeer

Frofile."

-2-

_ NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 251

---

## Page 252

The Attorney General

In response to the soconu request in your letter,

my answer is rostricted to communications botween the white

House and the FBI as it would not bo appropriate for me to

attenpt to respond for other agencies under your jurisdiction.

There are two major areas in which the ittorney

General doos not soe conmunications between the White House

and the FBI. They are tho results of name checks and the

rosults of lull fiold investigationsue do for the White Houso.

The thite House requests approximately 13,000 name checks per

year concerning persons who vicit the Whito House complex who

could pose a physical threat or possiblo embarrassment to tho

Presidont directly or indirectly. Aoprosimately 1,000 full

fiold background investigations on Frosidontial appointoes,

rembers of the White House staff, and othor porsons having

regular access to the White Houso are requesto& annually.

1 direct your attention to section 0.15 (o) (7);

Code of Federal Regulations, which states that the

Do citorny Gonoral shall coordinate Daparimontal liaison

with the white House

staff and the Executive Office of the

President."

when this ordor was promulgated there vere

discussions botween the Deparinent and Lurcau officials as

to its implomentation and its impact on oxioting direct

liaison between the FBI and the White House.

ly letter to

the Attorney Gonoral, lay 2, 1974, cautioned "Rovision of the

Departmont of Justico Organization Regulations (28 (FA Fart O),"

sot forth tho FBI's need for a Special Agent-liaison officor

to handle day to day oporational liaison with the thite House.

His activitios vero outlined and it was roquested that he

continuo to handle operational problous on a dally basis

with spocific individuals bocause of the sonsitivity of tho

matters involved, both of a personal security and intelligence

nature.

By menorandun datod May 16, 1974, captioned "Diroct

Operational Liaison with the White House,"

authorized the continuance of FBI diroct operationol liaison

with the thite House.

-3-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 252

---

## Page 253

The Attorney General

With the exceptions as notea above, the fBI has

adhered to a policy that when information is given to the

White House the Attorney General is given the same information

contemporaneously. Most of this information rolates to current

matters pertaining to the national socurity. This dissomination

to the White House is comotimes based on roquests Iron tho

White House but more frequontly on the initiative of the FBI.

With regard to any correspondence directed to this

Bureau from the white House, short of a Ille by file revier.

there is no means of determining whother or not such communica-

tions bypassed the Attorney Gonoral.

The established rule of furnishing the Attoracy

General copics of corrospondence to the Whito Housc should be

followed strictly so that the Attorney General 1s kept iully

informed on matters of interest to him.

1 - The Daputy Attornoy General

Attontion: K. William U' Connor

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

= 4 -

INW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 253

---

## Page 254

FROM

SUBJECTI

RETAINED

AZCORDS UNIT

19 19

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

RIB

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Mr. J. B. Adams

DATE:

1. - Mr.

1

B.

Adams

- Mr.

J. A. Mintz

1 - Mr. J. Cochran

7/25/75

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Ger. Tv. -

: W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr.

1 - Mr.

W.

R.

Wannall

w. 0. Cregar

(220

action

aboratory -

L'ogal Coun..

Plan. & Eval. -

SENSTUDY '75

10110l00 SP2 ALm/716

Spoc. Inv. -

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y —

By memorandum dated 4/23/75, you were advised that

former Intelligence Division Supervisor (Lish Whitson reported

to the writer that he had been interviewed by Mike Epstein of

the Senate Select Committee Staff regarding the Martin Luther

King case. Whitson had participated in activity at the

direction of former Assistant to the Director, William C.

Sullivan, relating to the mailing of a package from Florida

The package had been delivered to Whitson,

at National Airport on a Saturday by someone unknown to

Whitson.

At 5:30 p.m., today, Whitson telephoned the writer

to state that he had been contacted by phone just a few

minutes before by Mike Epstein. He said that the latter

asked him,

Unitson, It the person who had met him at

National Airgort and turned the package over to him was

either "Doc/ Miller (Fred M. Miller) or John

Whitson said he told Epster that it was-neither t

two former

FBI Laboratory employees.

ACTION:

42-116345.

509

EX-IU1

REC-1

former Supervisor Whitson.

To record information furnished voluntarilY AUG 13 1975

O'Th

(6)

pur

c0-67

gon

APH 24 19,712

7 9 AUG 1 4 1975

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 254

---

## Page 255

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (4) CFA) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

FROM

: Mr. J. B.

Adares

Legal Counsel engr

1 - Mr. Wannall

1 - Mr. Walsh

1 - Mr. Mintz

DATE: 7-21-75

1 - Mr. Hotis

1 - Mr. Daly

SMORI6

Assoc. Dir. _

Dop. AD Adm. -

Dap. AD Iv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

Gan. Inv. -

Ident..

Inspection

Intell. -

Laboratory

Legal Coun.

Plan. & Eval.

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

Telephone Rm. -

Diractor Sac'y -

On 7-18-75 Michael Epstein, staff member of the

Senate Select Committee, advised that he desires to interview the

following Agents: Donald P. Burgess, Robert W. Thomson, O. Richard

Hamilton, Charles T. Haynes and Alden F. Miller, all of the Atlanta Office.

Additionally, he requested that SA W. John Benton of the Knoxville Office

be made available in Atlanta. All interviews will be conducted on Tuesday,

7-22-75. The scope of the interviews will be the Bureau investigation of

Martin Luther King. K. William O'Connor, Special Counsel for Intelligence

Coordination in the Department, advised Assistant Director John A. Mintz

on 7-18-75 that staff interviews would no longer be considered a demand

and thus no longer necessitate a waiver of the Code of Federal Regulations

provisions concerning interviews.

After securing the approval of Robert H. Cahill of the

Administrative Division for the travel of Benton to Atlanta, SAC Harold C.

Swanson, Knoxville Office, was telephonically advised on 7-18-75 to

arrange that Benton be available in Atlanta, 7-22-75.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

(1) That existing employment agreements of the aforementioned

special Agents bo waved tor purposes -1 in 6 395- 508

7 JUL 22 1975

(2) That a representative of the Intelligence Division travel

to Atlanta to be available for consultation for the interview.

7 9 AUG 1 4 1975

1 - Personnel File of Donald P. Burgess

1 - Personnel File of O. Richard Hamilton

1 - Personnel File of Charles T. Haynes

1 - Personnel File of Alden F. Miller

• - Personnel File of Robert W. Thomson

K14 - Personnel File of W. John Benton

NW 65360o Docid:52388/5/13 BeyS. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payrol Savings Plan

---

## Page 256

2 -

Vir. J. A. Mintz

(1 - J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. D. Ryan

July 16, 1975

The Attorney General

Director, FBI

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

, ố

Reference is made to memorandum from Senate Select

Committee dated May 14, 1975, and appendices thereto, requesting

certain documents and other information from the FBI.

Attached for your approval and forwarding to the

Committee is the original of a memorandum which is responsive to

one of the Committee's requests.

A copy of the memorandum is being provided for your

records.

#MARIG

SPAALMATE

marry. FILED

Enclosures (2)

62-116395

1:10-10-00

1 - The Deputy Attorney General

Attention: K. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

RECI (2 1422507

1 - 62-116009

DR 1115

(10)

*aX: AUG 13 1975

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. -

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com.

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

• AUG 1 41975

Spec. Inv,.

Training -

Legal Coun.

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 256

PiM

Join

TELETYPE UNIT L

6063 14 KI

G70 251-546

---

## Page 257

62-116395

2 -

vir. J. A. Mintz

(1 - J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. D. Ryan

July 16, 1975

UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

TO STUDY GOVERNVENTAL OPERATIONS

WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES

RE: DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE

COMMITTEE'S PRIOR REQUEST

Reference is made to memorandum from captioned

Committee dated May 14, 1975, and the appendices thereto, which

contained requests for information from the Federal Bureau of

Investigation (FBI).

Item 5 J, Appendix A, requested all memoranda of

the FBI and the Justice Department discussing the legal authority

of the FBI to use so-called "Cointelpro" techniques and methods,

including all forms of organizational "disruption."

A review of all logical files of the FBI and a canvass

of appropriate personnel knowledgeable of the counterintelligence

programs has failed to locate any documents discussing the legal

authority of the FBI to use Cointelpro techniques and methods.

1 - The Attorney General

1 - 62-116009

#MDR16:

SP. 2 ALM)ITG

(9)

10-10-00

Assoc. Dir.-

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. _

isst. Dir.:

Admin..

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

' Files & Com..

"Gen. Inv.

Ident.

• Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval..

Spec. Inv. -

Training -

Legal Coun. _

Telephone Rm. -

Director Sec'y -

MAIL ROOM L

WNW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 257

pam

TELETYPE UNIT L

z.1!51.

/Go 954-545

---

## Page 258

i to

7-451359-1--1x--28-

5-140 (Rev. 1-21-74) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20535

Addressee:

OLER

Senate Select Sonmittee

EX LHM

_ Memo

→ Report dated _

7/16/75

Senate Select Committee. Re; Documents

Caption, of Document: Pertaining to the Committee's Prior

Request. Item 5J, Appendix A (May 14, 1975

Originating Office:

FBI

requesti

#MDR16

10110100 SP-2 Ain/ETE

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 258

---

## Page 259

• in

=

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

TO: Intelligence Community Staff

ATTN: Central Index

FROM:

FBI

SUBJECT: Abstract of Information Provided to Select Committees

appropriate term.

If a document was made available

ransmitted, so note.)

X/ DOCUMENT |

BRIEFING

INTERVIEW|

TESTIMONY |

TOTHER

3. TO WHOM PROVIDED (check appropriate

term; add specific names if appropriate)

SSC

HSC

interviewee, testifier and

Mamorandun

SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE

BEFORE COMPLETING.

2. DATE PROVIDED

7/16/75

DAT 16/00 SPaAMIG

S. Lu RESPoNsE To also date on itoo, merative, suppose, to pal request, other-

SSC letter 5/14/75, Appendix A, Iten 53

U

?. Key "unde fent for eppsopriate key words from the list provided separately; if key words not listed are

GOINTELFRO

SUMMARY (see reverse side before completing this item)

SSC requested all menoranda of FBI and Justice Department

discussing the logal euthority of the FBI to use so-called

"COINIaLRO" techniques and nethods including all forns of

organizational "alsruption", A review of all logical files

of the FBI and a canvass of appropriate personnel knowledgeable

of the counterintelligence programs has failed to locate any

documents discussing the legal authority of the FBI to use

CUINTELPRO techaiques and nethods.

62-116995

TREAT AS VELLOW

EMK: Fnk:

(4)

ORIGINAL VIA LIAISON TO THE CENIRAL, COMMUNITY INDEX!

IN CONNECTION WITH HENSTUDY 75

379| (6-75)

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 259

CLASSIFY AS APPROPRIATE

---

## Page 260

INSTRUCTIONS

• Type or print clearly in"ink.

• Indicate classification of the abstract top and bottom.

• Date the abstract and put on any internal control numbers required.

• "FROM" entry should clearly identify the organization providing the

information.

• If additions (as when a copy of document sent to SSC is later sent to

HSC) or changes to a previously submitted form are necessary:, submit a

copy of the original abstract, with the change indicated.

SPECIFIC ITEM NO. 8. SUMMARY - enter brief narrative statement describing

substance of information and showing relationship to Intelligence Community

matters if appropriate.

Any feedback or evidence of investigatory interests

should be noted. Commitments made to supply additional information should be

noted. Additionally, certain administrative information may be entered here,

e.g., restrictions on review of a document, if document was paraphrased, whether

interviewee is current or former employee, etc. If actual document or transcript

is provided, that fact should be noted and no summary is required. Additional

pages may be attached if necessary.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 260

---

## Page 261

OSTIONAL FORMANO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

: Mr. J. B. Adams

FROM

: Legal Counsel

SUBJECT:

SENSTUDY 75

Assoc. Dir.

DATE: 7-10-75

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell.

2810091222099/10

11:10/10/00 0SP-2ALM/FTG

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Soc'y -

Attached is a copy of a Departmental memorandum which

interprets "demand" under 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 16.21

et seq. for the purpose of dealing with the. Senate Select Committee. The

provisions of 16 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 16. 21 et seg. requires

Departmental approval in those instances where a current or former

employee in response to a demand of a court or authority is required

to furnish material contained in Departmental files or disclose information

contained therein.

The Department decision as set forth in the attachment.

characterizes all requests by Senate Select Committee staff members

as a demand which requires a waiver from the Department prior to the

l employee's submission to the Committee request.

REG 1 02-111345506

According to the Departmental position concerning demand,

the Director or "the FBI General Counsel" in coordination with the Special

Counsel for Intelligence Coordination of the Department may waive the

provision of 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 16.21 et seq. This

is in accordance with the provision of Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations.

Section 16.23.

13

114 AUG I 1975

Upon receipt of the attached documents, SA Paul V. Daly

_and Inspector John B. Hotis of this Division sought clarification concerning

the Departmental interpretation of "demand" as set forth in attachment,

including whether this interpretation applied to the General Accounting

Office (GAO) inquiry into the Bureau. K. William O'Connor, Special

Counsel for Intelligence Coordination, stated he believed this might also

apply to GAO, however, he had not really thought out this point. He was

also asked what was meant by the phrase, "in coordination with this office."

Mr. O'Connor indicated that he wanted to be notified of requests for interviews

and that was what he meant by the phrase, "in coordination with this office."

1 - Mr.

Wannall - Enclosure

1 - Mr. Mintz - Enclosure

1 - Mr. Cregar - Enclosure

1 - Mr. Finzel - Enclosure

1 - Mr. Hotis - Enclosure

1 - Nir. Daly - Enclosure

PVD:kjs (8)

CONTINUED - OVER

NS 653606 DoLl: 32

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan )I-

1627 Page 261

---

## Page 262

Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams Memo

RE: SENSTUDY 75

He was advised by SA Daly that we had previously received requests

for the interview of a number of employees in Atlanta, Georgia, by the

Committee and that upon receipt of the attached communication, after

consultation with Deputy Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination

Michael Shaheen, SA Daly had telephonically informed John Elliff, head

of the domestic intelligence task force for the Committee, of the

Department's interpretation as set forth in the attached document and

) the fact that Mr. Biliff should contact Mr. O'Connor concerning these

proposed interviews. Mr. O'Connor said that he had been contacted by

Mr. Elliff and had, in fact, told Mr. Elliff there would be no interviews.

In this regard, O'Connor stated the Department had prepared a proposed

draft letter to the Committee expressing concern for the Fifth Amendment

rights for Bureau employees and raising other legal issues. Mr. O'Connor

indicated that the finalized form of this letter should be sent to the

Committee in the near future.

The results of the conversation with John Elliff by O'Connor

have caused the Office of Legal Analysis to recéive complaints concerning

this decision from various Committee staff members, including Mark

Gitenstein and Michael Epstein. We can anticipate, unless this particular

problem is resolved, receiving protests from their superiors on the

Committee.

RECOMMENDATION:

You will be kept advised of developments concerning this

ette this ell an the e i nee at to determine what

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 262

---

## Page 263

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530

JUL

8 1975

TO: John A. Mintz

Legal Counsel Division

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FROMKE. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

The attached self-explanatory memo, which the Deputy Attorney

General has approved, interprets the word "demand" for the purpose of

dealing with Senate Select Committee, under 28 C.F.R., 16.21.

It is

furnished for your information.

FMDR16

pare win;

1116-16-00

•SP 2 ALMIZTE

REC-1

LENPIOSURE

12-114395-506

BE AUG S 1975

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 263

---

## Page 264

OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530 ?

JUN 2 3 1975

I BillO'e.

viti

-MARIG

H

10:

Harold R. Tyler, Jr.

Deputy Attorney General

A FROM:

K. William O'Connor

Special Counsel for

Intelligence Coordination

Interpretation of "Demand",

28 C.F.R., 3 16.21, et. sed. - Action Memorandum

The meaning of "demand" is not indicated, beyond subpoena, in

the C.F.R. sections indicated. This omission creates a need for an

interpretation, for purposes of uniform Department of Justice reaction.

Outlines for inquiry proceedings were agreed upon between the

White House and the Senate Select Committee on June 13, 1915, and a

copy of those procedures was iurnished to the Department on June 16,

1975. Under those guidelines, there is a general undertaking by the

Conmittee to identify witnesses to the Agency a reasonable time berore

the interviews occur. This general rule includes current and former

employees; certain exceptions (not clearly defined) are indicated in

the guidelines.

The Committee is required to provide the witness with

a copy of the procedures, and "relevant waivers of secrecy oaths or

agreements for the purpose of this inquiry". The Committee is required

to give prior notice of an interview, generally, specifying: (a) sub-

ject area; (b) periods of employment; (c) the date set for the interview.

Since these structured procedures, taken with the rules of the

Subcommittee, may create a requirement of testimony upon witnesses, it

seems to me clear that the paragraphs of 28 C.F.R., $ 16.21, et. seg.

which refer to "demand" should be interpreted to include any request

by any Committee staff member to interview any employee, former employee

or other person connected with the Department of Justice.

This interpretation requires certain action: (1) that the wit-

ness be authorized to speak under § 16.23 by an appropriate Department

Official; and, (2) that an appropriate Department Official be designated.

I would think that the appropriate Department Official for the FBI should

be the Director of the F'Bl or the FBl General Counsel, in coordination

with this office.

255-3

6.2..

116

395

506

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 264

---

## Page 265

.

As a matter of current practice, the fBI and other components

of the Department are presently coordinating with me on agreements

for disclosure under s 16.23, as a system for ensuring that they are

receiving treatment consistent with the outlines of inquiry procedure

and the agreements between the Committee and the Department.

If you approve, I will advise the involved components of the

Department of Justice that the word "demand" will be interpreted as

indicated for each witness.

Disapprove

Let's Discuss

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 265

---

## Page 266

TIONAL FORM NO. 1

AY 1962 EDITIO

GSA FPAIR (13 CFRO 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

: Mr. J. B. Adams

DATE: • 7-23-75

FROM

; Legal Counselfh

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

On July 23, 1975, Mike Gitenstein, staf

member Senate Select Committee "Official

requested that he

be given a briefing concerning

fidential" files.

-and con-

By way of background, we furnished

a summary of the inspection inquiry to the Committee

by letterhead memorandum dated 7-16-75, and also

made available for review in Bureau space a list of

people contacted during the course of this inquiry.

With regard to Gitenstein's request it would

appear beneficial for

us to brief the Senate Select

Committee representative concerning the scope and

details of this inquiry.

In this regard it appears

Gitenstein is interested in those individuals who

were contacted by the Inspection Division during their

inspection into the "Official and Confidential"

files.

If approved the briefing will be tentatively

scheduled for Friday, July 25, 1975.

RECOMMENDATION :

That a briefing be arranged for Gitenstein

concerning the "Official and Confidential" files

inspection inquiry by Inspection Division.

1-Mr. Bassett.

REG-47 62-116395-505

1-Mr. Wannall

1-Mx. Cregar

1-Mr. Mintz

1-Mr. Hotis

1-Mr. Daly

5

JUL 291975

PVD: 1gp. O9

(8)

with Gitensteirm.

Briefing held /2shs

per

I Helge on and Wines

Gene all, traces hum chinessies

Docld:32989627 P¼ke 266 Jawings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

1849751 sm moung an enter

sage factle,

Assoc. Dir.

Dep. AD Adm. _

Dép. AD Inv. _

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. _

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs _

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspectat

Intell.

Flan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Soc'y -

mOR

16

0011/.10x

---

## Page 267

OPTIONAI FORM NO. 10

"MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA FPAIR (41 CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO

: Mr. J. B. Adams

FROM

: Legal Counse

0

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

DATE: 7-23-75

Assoç.

Davi

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dop. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst. -

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv. -

Ident. -

Inspection

Intell.

f Spec. Inv. -

Training

Telephone Rm. -

Director Soc'y -

By memorandum dated June 24, 1975, you were

advised of the Department's intention to make a closed

Departmental file-available to captioned Committee.

The file contained the results of a criminal investigation

The Intelligence, General

Investigative and Special Investigative Divisions were

requested to furnish their views concerning this matter

and the Legal Counsel Division was to prepare a letter

to the Department setting forth the Bureau's position

with regard to this matter.

We have since had discussions with the Attorney

General and other representatives of the Department concerning

Senate Select Committee access to Bureau files and

submitted correspondence to the Department concerning

this matter.

It would appear additional communications

to the Department are unnecessary. The Department is

well aware of our position in this matter.

RECOMMENDATION:

We do not prepare a communication to the

Department concerning this matter.

Enclosure

EX-108

1-Mr. Wannall

1-Mr. Cregar

1-Mr.

Gallagher

1-Mr. Cleveland

1-Mr

Mintz

1-Mr. Hotis

1-Mr. Daly

PVD : 1gp

(9)

REC-47.

6

16395=

#MORIG

10-10-00 SR2 ALmITTG

JUL 28 1975

84 120

• 1 5 1975.

NW 65360-docld:32989627

Bage 26S Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 268

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

Transmit the following in

Via

AIRTEL

TO

RE :

F BI

Date:

8/7/75

(Type in plaintext or code)

AIR MAIL

(Priority)

DIRECTOR, FBI

ADIC, LOS ANGELES (66-6243)

SENSTUDY 75

#MDR16

"::979080 00 255)

IL 00000

110110/00 EXSP-2 ALM /7TG

ReButel 7/30/75.

Enclosed are 8 copies of LHM reflecting interview

Of ADIC ROBERT E. GEBHARDT by LESTER SEIDEL, Staff Member

of the Senate. Select Committee, United States Senate.

Erie.

COPY

RETAINED

PERSONNEL

RECORIS

iniT

L07

8/18/15

dei planus

dectraged

(ENCLOSURE

- Bureau (8 Encls)

- Los Angeles

/mmb

(3)

9 SEP 1 7 1975

Approved:

Special Agent in Charge

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 268

REC-36

02W2

503

194 AUG 11/191

Sent

_ M

Per -

U.S. Government Printing Office: 1972 - 455-574

---

## Page 269

In Reply, Please Refer to

File No.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Los Angeles, California

August

7, 1975

#MDR16

MIT, YOTOTATTON CORATNE

" 3097109

Dass 10/10100 x Sta ALmATE

U. S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE

ACTIVITTES (SSC) ; INTERVIEW OF ASSISTANT

DIRECTOR IN CHARGE ROBERT E. GEBHARDT BY

SSC STAFF MEMBER

On August 7, 1975, Assistant Director Robert E.

Gebhardt, Los Angeles Division, was interviewed in the Los

Angeles

FBI Office by Mr. Lester Seidel, Staff Member of

the Senate Select Committee, United States Senate.

Gebhardt's rights were not explained to him by

Seidel although Seidel did explain the purpose of the

The interview lasted from 9:05 AM until 10:30 AM,

and it was not necessary for Gebhardt to consult with any

Bureau representative.

Gebhardt had previously been advised by a Bureau

representative of his right to counsel, the privileged areas

of information, consultation privileges, and the parameters

Seidel inquired at the outset as to whether Gebhardt

was aware of the Cointel Program relative to the Black Panther

Party investigation on a day-to day basis being specifically

advised details of the investigation as it relates to the

,Cointel Program.

It was explained to Seidel that as Special

Agent in Charge of the San Francisco FBI Office wherein

over 500 employees were located at the time, Gebhardt had

many responsibilities in the operation of that division and

PROPERTY OF THE FBI

This document contains neither

recommendations nor conclusions of

the FBI.

It is the property of the

FBI and is loansd to your agency;

it and iis contents are not to be

42-116385=505

distributed outside your agency.

ENCLOSURE

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 269

---

## Page 270

therefore,

day-today direction of the various matters under investigation,

including the investigation of the Black Panther Party.

It was further explained that if a problem was

encountered or a particularly unusual situation developed,

Gebhardt was, of course, consulted and was available for

such consultation to resolve any particular problem areas.

Gebhardt was next asked if he recalled being SAC

when the electronic coverage of the Black Panther Party and

the various officials at BBP was instituted and eventually

terminated. Seidel was advised that the electronic coverage

was already in effect upon Gebhardt"s arrival kelve Decision"

does recall receiving a phone call after the

was handed down instructing that all electronic coverage of

the BPP

and the various members of the BPP be discontinued.

The call was received from Bureau Headquarters and the

discontinuance was effected immediately.

Seidel inquired as to whether Gebhardt felt the

intelligence type investigations should be completely

"removed

from the criminal investigations which investigations would be

looking toward eventual prosecution.

Seidel was informed by Gebhardt that even in criminal

investigations looking toward prosecutions, much intelligence

information is obtained from time to time which really has no

value with respect to the direction of the investigation.

In

information may be obtained and in other types, very little.

Insofar as the FBI is concerned, however, every effort is

made to make certain there is some Federal law which would be

a basis for an investigation which procedures would include

matters commonly referred to as security investigations.

In some instances, in such security investigations

a great deal of intelligence information would be obtained

therefore, it was Gebhardt's opinion that so-called intelli-

gence type investigations should not be removed from or

toward prosecution sine intelligence normation i am

outgrowth of the basic investigation.

- 2 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 270

---

## Page 271

Gebhardt was asked if he felt the Cointelpro was a

separate entity distinguished trom the basic investigation

and it was explained that the Cointelpro was a phase of the

overall investigation in any particular organization or

individual.

Gebhardt was asked if he felt Congress should enact

legislation which would set forth specific investigative

techniques that could or could not be utilized by the FBl or

other Federal investigative agencies. He was advised in

Gebhardt's opinion, such legislation

should not be enacted,

and in reply to the question as to why such legislation shoul

not be enacted, it was pointed out that as an investigative

agency, there must of necessity be allowed a certain flexi-

bility

because no two investigations are exactly alike and the

circumstances of such investigations could possibly not be

related to such Federal law.

In answer to the question as to how Congress should

assure the American public that questionable activity such

as the Cointelpro, was not being engaged in by an investigative

agency such as the FBI, Seidel was informed that the Congress

and the American people must rely upon the integrity and

honesty of the Director of

the FBI and the Attorney General.

It was pointed out that both the Director of the

FBI and the Attorney General are nominated by the President,

hearings are held before the various Congressional Committees

and finally approved by the Senate.

It was further pointed

out that Director Kelley has recently stated in connection with

the publicity relative to Cointelpro, that he has no intention

of permitting this program to be reinstituted in the FBI and

II circumstances ever arose which circumstances he could noi

ontemplated-at this time, wherein it was thought sucl

activities should be embarked upon, he would obtain the personal

approval of the Attorney General prior to such instituting.

Seidel was informed that Gebhardt was in total agreement with

this statement of Mr. Kelley.

Gebhardt was asked as to what his feelings were

relative to what the relationship should be between the FBI

and Congress.

He was informed that a Senate Oversight

Committee was recently established and it was felt that this

was a good start and that this Committee should formalize and

- 3 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 271

---

## Page 272

.,4.

standardize their oversight responsibilities and make regular

inquiries of the Director and other officials of the FBI as

to our activities. He was informed that there should be

either a joint oversight committee between the House and

Senate or if the Congress decided on two

in both the House and Senate, these committees should be the

entities through which all information relative to the

activities of the FBI should flow.

It was emphasized however, that there should be

regular consultation between these representatives and the

FBI.

Inquiry was made as to Gebhardt's opinion relative

to the relationship between the Department of Justice and

the FBI and Seidel was informed the relationship, in Gebhardt's

opinion, is excellent, should continue, and there should be

flow of information between the

FBI and the Department

of Justice.

At the conclusion of the interview, Gebhardt summed

up his comments by stating that Congress should definitely

set up

a structured oversight procedure of the activities

of the FBI with due regard to the confidentiality of many

of the FBI operations and investigations and must assure

itself that the members of the Committee and its staff will

maintain the confidentiality where necessary.

Secondly, in the areas of investigative matters

usually referred

to as national defense, national security

or intelligence operations, all of the FBI investigations

must be based on the application of the facts toward a

statute, consultation with the Department of Justice should

- 4 -

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 272

---

## Page 273

OPTIONAL FORM NO, 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA EPAIR (41, CFR) 101-11.6

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

: Mr. Adams

FROM:

Legal Counsell

SUBJECT

SENSTUDY 75

DATE: 6-18-75

MDR16

":"

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dap. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin. _

Comp. Syst. _

Ext. Affairs

Filos & Com.

Gon. Inv.

Laboratory Ser

Legal Coun. -

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Telephone Rm. _

Director Soc'y -

At 10 a.m., on 6-18-75, Mr. William Miller,

Staff Director Senate Select Committee on Intelligence

Activities called Inspector John B. Hotis to advise that b

he heard a report on the radio earlier that morning

concerning the alleged penetration of Congressional

bloc Nations.

details and stated he was uncertain whether the report

alleged actual penetration of the offices or simply

increased contacts by the Soviets with Members of Congress.

Miller said he believed the source of the report was a

television interview of Senator Goldwater

• (R-Arizona)

on Sunday, 6-15-75.

Mr. Miller said the members of the Senate

Committee were concerned about these allegations and

asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation to inquire

into the matter. Assistant Director Wannall has been

advised of this request.

RECOMMENDATION:

In view of the sensitivity of this matter, it

is recommended that the Intelligence Division prepare

an oral briefing for Mr. Miller concerning increased Soviet

contacts with Members of Congress:

REC-36 62-1411395

502

1-Mr. Wannall

I-Mr. Cregar

1-Mr. Mintz

I-Mr. Daly

1-Mr. Hotis

estra.

inster,

feta

RWES

17/74

061197589627 Ba 45 Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

---

## Page 274

•REDERAL BUNCAU OF INVESTIGATION

SOMMUNICATIONS SECTION

,NR0D2 PH PLAIN

417 PM URGENT AUG. 6, 1975 DCC

TELETYPE

Assos. Dir.

Dep-A.D.-Adza

Dep.-A.D.-InVa-

Asst, Dir.:

Admin. ...

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. -

Gen. Inv.

Ident.

Inspection

Intell.

Laboratory

Plan, & Eval.

Spec. Inv.

Training

Legal Cour

Telephone BIl. -

Director Ser'y -

TO

DIRECTOR (62-116395)

FROM

PHILADELPHIA (62-D-23222)

SENSTUDY

RE PHILADELPHIA NITEL TO THE BUREAU, JULY 3D, 1975,

AND PHILADELPHIA TELCALL TO THE BUREAU, AUGUST 6, 1975.

ON AUGUST 6, 1975, MRS. ROBERT THWEAT ADVISED THAT

HER SOURCE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED IN RE NITEL IS AMY MITCHELL,

AGE 24, EMPLOYED BY THE CITIZENS ' ACTION COMMITTEE AT THE

WHITE HOUSE. SHE CAN BE REACHED AT TELEPHONE NUMBER 456-

6466 AFTER 2:00 PM THIS DATE. SHE PREFERS INTERVIEW IN

WASHINGTON, D. C., THIS EVENING. SHE DOES NOT DESIRE HER

NAME DIVULGED OR CREDITED AS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF INFOR-

MATION.

PHILADELPHIA WILL REPORT ANY FURTHER INFORMATION THAT

IS PROVIDED BY MR. OR MRS. THWEAT.

END

PLS ACK FOR TWO

VLJ ACK FOR TWO

FBIHQ CLR

REG- 102

6211=343 501

12 AUC 11 1975

AMORIE

CLAZSAALD

• 4 AUG 1 5 19/6

NWV 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 274

---

## Page 275

NR092 PH PLAIN

EEPERAL BURCAU DE INVESTIGATION

COMMUNICATIONS SECTION

100. 10

TELETYPE

417 PM URGENT AUG. 8g 1975 DCC

Azzoe Dir..

Dep-AD.-Ader

Dep-A.D.-Iav

Asst. Dir.:

Admin..

Comp. Syst

Eist Aclairs

Files & Cor.

Gen. inT. -

Ident.

Inspection Te

Intull.

Lavracory

Plan. & Exei,

Spec. Inv.-

Training -

Lazal Coun

Telephone Ex. -

Director Ser's

TO

DIRECTOR (52-116395)

PROM

PHILADELPHIA (62-D-23222)

SENSTUDY IT'

RE PHILADELPHIA NITEL TO THE BUREAU, JULY 30, 1975,

AND PHILADELPHIA TELCALL IO THE BUREAU, AUGUST 6, 1975.

ON AUGUST 6, 1975, MRS. ROBERT THWEAT ADVISED THAI

•HER SOURCE PREVIOUSLY MENIIONED IN RE NITEL IS AMY MITCHELL

AGE 24, EMPLOYED BY IHE CITIZENS' ACTION COMMITTEE AT THE

WHITE HOUSE• SHE CAN BE REACHED AT TELEPHONE NUMBER 456-

C466 AFTER 2:00 PM THIS DATE. SHE PREFERS INTERVIEW IN

WASHINGTON, D. C., THIS EVENING. SHE DOES NOT DESIRE HER

NAME DIVULGED OR CREDITED AS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF INFOR-

MATIONO

=

PHILADELPHIA WILL REPORT ANY FURTHER INFORMATION THAT

IS PROVIDED BY MR. OR MRS. THWEAT•

END

PLE NOT FOR T4O

VLJ ACK FOR TWO

FBINQ CLR

REC- 102

29 AUG 11 1975

.: ceiat-2221

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

DATE 10110/00 BX SP-2 ALM/STE

• 1

NW965360; Dog|d197989627 Page 275

---

## Page 276

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:!

OPTIONAL PORM NO. 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

OSA GEN, REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

Mr. W. R. Wannall

W. O. Gregar Eu,

SENSTUDY 75

1 - Mr. J. B. Adams

1 - Mr. J.

A. Mintz

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

DATE:

8/6/75

1 - Mr. S. S. Mignosa

1 - Mr. W. O. Cregar

• 1 - Mr.

T. J. McNiff

Assoc. Dir.-

Dap. AD Adm._.

Dop. AD inv. -

Asse. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.-

Ext. Affairs -

Files & Com. m

Gon. Irv. —

ldont..

Inspection

ingelick

Laboratory

Plan. & Eval.

Spec. Inv. -

Treining -

Lagal Coun.

Telephono Rm. -

Diroctor Sec'y —

PURPOSE:

ITI. INFORVATTON CONTAINED

HEREIN IS UNCLASSITIED

DATE 12 - 19-883xSP-1 A66 em

To advise of recent developments in matter involving

possible leak of intelligence community information in

possession of Senate Select Committee (SSC).

DETAILS:

Nw 85.

My memorandum to you dated 8/1/75, captioned as

above (copy attached), advised that our Philadelphia Office

recently received information that a member of the SSC had

reportedly, without authorization, Xeroxed a CIA document in

possession of the Committee for subsequent transmittal to

Congressman Morris Udall.

Since receipt of this original

information, our Philadelphia Office has been attempting to

arrange for an interview of the original source of this

information.

1-62-116395-

The following information is set forth to advise

you of pertinent developments subsequent to my memorandum

of 8/1/75.

At approximately 3:00 p.m., 8/5/75, Mr. LIBals Madis

Executive Assistant to the Deputy Associate Director, advised

Special Agent (SA) Thomas J. McNiff that the contemplated: i

interview of the source should not be conducted prior to a

discussion that Mr. Nicholas P. Callahan, Associate Director,

was scheduled to have with appropriate representatives of the

Department concerning this matter. At approximately 5:00 p.m.,

8/5/75, Mr. Mack advised SA McNiff that Department representa-

tives had been appropriately advised and that the interview of

source should be conducted at the earliest time.

I Enclosure

62-216395

ROUTE IT ENVELOPE

5

Aboard 20806o Hage 276

CONTINUED - OVER

---

## Page 277

Memorandum to Mr.

Re:

Senstudy 75

62-116395

W. R. Wannall

At 10:35 a.m., 8/6/75, SA John Kutz, Philadelphia

Office, called and advised that

he had been in touch this

date with Mrs. Robert Thweat who advised that the identity

JFK Act

5 (9) 12) (D)

JFK Act 5 (g) (2)(p) can be contacted at phone number 456-6466 between

the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m., 8/6/75. JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

advised if not contacted prior to 4:00 p.m.K Act 5 (g) 2) Prould

be unavailable (for unexplained zeasons) until after 8/11/75.

Mrs. Thweat also advised that

JFK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

desired

that her name remain confidential. with regard to any information

she would furnish this Bureau and that under no circumstances

would she be agreeable to testimony.

At 10:55 a.M., 8/6/75, MI. Mack was contacted and

advised of the above recent information received from

Philadelphia and that arrangements were being effected for

Agents of the Washington Field Office (WFO) to contacurk Act 5 (g) 12

for purpose of interview.

At 11:20 a.m., 8/6/75, SA McNiff personally contacted

ASAC Cornelius G. Sullivan, WFO, and furnished him with copies

of Philadelphia teletypes 7/29/75 and 7/30/75 concerning this

matter, as well as briefing him of developments subsequent to

information contained in these teletypes. ASAC Sullivan was

instructed to have two

experienced Agents contacuk Act 5 (g) (2)(PLn

the above-mentioned timeframe for the purpose of arranging an

interview offk Act 5 (g) (2) (p)

At approximately 1:30 p.m., 8/6/75, SAs Donald E.

Stukey II and Daniel J. Kiernan contacted SA McNiff at FBIHQ

for the purpose of briefing prior to initiating contact with

JFK Act 5 (g) 12)) These Agents were brought up to date regarding

available information relating to this matter and were

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 277

-2-

---

## Page 278

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re:

Senstudy 75

62-116395

instructed to insure that the interview oK Act 5 (g) 12) Pas

conducted in a most discreet and thorough manner. They were

instructed to submit this evening a nitel summarizing results

of the interview followed immediately by an IHM suitable

for dissemination setting forth in detail results of the

interview.

At 2:15 p.m., 8/6/75, SA Stukey called advising

that he had telephonically contacteurk Act 5 (g) (2) pid arranged

for an interview of her at her residence at 6:00 p.I., 8/6/75.

ACTION:

None. Above submitted for information. You will

be advised of results of interview along with recommendation

for additional action

to be taken in this matter.

EUS

-

3

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 278

---

## Page 279

SECRET

lis

August 5, 1975

1iŸ5

REQUEST FOR FBI MATERIALS

I.

6/75

Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Monday, August 11, 1975:

A., The notebook or binder containing materials on the

FBI legal authority and maintained in the Office of

the Special Counsel.

B.

Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970

previously made accessible at FBIHO in excisea

form; unexcised versions of the memoranda bearing

the item-number designations 8, 9, 30, 32, and 37.

c.

"Foreign Operations Policy Manual," previously

made accessible at FBIHQ.

D.

Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division

and the San Francisco Field Office, as currently

sanitized.

Reid

62.116375

NOT RECORDED

114 AUG 121974

NOW Asidd Gobid:2989627 Page 279

---

## Page 280

- 2 -

II.

Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Friday, August 15, 1975:

A. The following materials maintained in the so-

called "Official and Confidential"

files and

designated "non-derogatory," previously examined

by SSC staff:

1. Agreement between FBI and Secret Service;

2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3. "Black Bag" Jobs;

4. Expansion of FBI Foreign Intelligence

Coverage;

5.

Intelligence Coverage - Domestic and

Foreign;

6.

Directives (60) :

7. Cook, Fred (52) .

B. Summaries or notes on interviews conducted by

Inspection Division for July 3 Inspection for

the individuals whose names are underscored on

the

attached list (slightly expanded from previous

access requests).

-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 280

---

## Page 281

- 3-

III.

Newly reguested materials; delivery requested by

Monday, August 11, 1975:

A. All of Section 8 of the Manual of Instructions.

B. Sections 1, 6, 7H, 7J, 8I, and 14F of the Manual

of Rules

and Regulations.

C. Superseding versions of Section 6 of the Manual

of Pules and Regulations, since January 1, 1960.

D. ‹ The following materials referred to in memoranda

previously delivered to SSC regarding FBI

legal attaches:

1. Memoranda of W. C. Sullivan of June 7, 1971,

and June 16, 1971;

2.

Menoranda of Mr. Wannall of May 27, 1971, and

May 28, 1971:

3. Letter of Hoover to the President dated

September 21, 1970;

4.

Memorandum of w. C. Sullivan dated September

22, 1970

5.

Memorandum of Mr. Brennan dated September 21

1970;

6.

Memoranaum of Mr. Child of May 23, 1969;

Recommendations of Dalby, Felt, and Beaver

upon the recommendation made in memorandum

of sullivan of June 7, 1971:

8. Material pertaining to an inspection of all

FBI foreign liaison posts conducted in 1971

pursuant to instructions from Hoover to

Assistant Director Ponder in charge of

inspections.

E.

Materials pertaining to the origin, operation, and

termination of the Mass Media Program implementea by

the former FBI Crime Records Division.

-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 281

---

## Page 282

- 4-

Materials pertaining to the establishment and

functions of the FBI External Affairs Division.

G. "Guide to Indexing" and "Rules Pertaining to

the General Index"

, cited at p. 14, Volume 1,

of the Classifying Instructor's Guide.

HI. "The Standard Sub List"

I. The 'following materials pertaining to Project

INLET:

• 1. Materials reflecting approval of the

Project on or about November 20, 1969.

2. Inspection Report referred to in SAC letter

of December 26, 1972.

3.

Letter from FBI to Congressman Les Aspin

in 1973 regarding the Project.

J. Materials pertaining to the policies ana procedures

of the FBI

for the use of FBI agents for so-called

''undercover"

activity.

K. The current address and assignment of Special Agent

(or former Special Agent) John Kunkle, who was assigned

to the Bureau's Hawaii office in 1955.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 282

---

## Page 283

- 5 -

IV.

Newly requested materials; delivery requested by

Friday, August 18, 1975:

A. The following materials referred to in memoranda

previously delivered to SSC regarding FBI Legal

Attaches:

1.

Materials pertaining to conversations

between the President and Hoover regarding

foreign liaison operations in September

1970;

2.

Materials pertaining to conversations between

DI. Kissinger and Hoover in December 1970;

3.

Materials pertaining to communications between

the FBI and the State Department regarding

foreign liaison operations in 1970;

4.

Materials pertaining to a conference with the

President regarding foreign liaison operations

in June 1971.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 283

---

## Page 284

- 6 -

v.

JEK Act 5 (g) (2) (D)

-

Newly requested materials; access to screen for

delivery requested by August 18, 1975:

A. The following materials pertaining to Mrs.

Claire (Anna) Chennault and Spiro T. Agnew:

1. All materials pertaining to the authorization

or re-authorization by the President or the

Attorney General of technical surveillance of

the

in Washington,

D.C.

in 1968.

2.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and "tele-

phone checkon of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennaul

In November 1968..

3.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and

"telephone checks" of Vice Presidential

candidate Spiro I. Agnew in November 1968.

4. All materials summarizing the results of tech-

nical or physical surveillance, including

incidental overhearings, and "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault and

Spiro I. Aqnew in November 1968, but not

including "logs".

5. All materials pertaining to White House

instructions to the FBI for the handling of

the summary letters described in item 4 above.

6.

All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the summary letters described in

item 4 above.

7.

The current addresses of the following formes

special Agents, who may have participated in the

technical or physical surveillance or "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault or

Spiro T. Agnew:

a. Phil Claridge

b. William Jackson

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 284

---

## Page 285

- 7-

-

B.

The following materials pertaining to Yeoman

Charles E. Radford:

All materials, including'memorializations

of oral cormunications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical surveillances of

Yeoman Charles E. Radford

from December

1971 to June 1972.

1

2. All materials, including memorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, concuct, and

termination of technical

surveillance of

two close personal friends of Yeoman Radford,

one retired from the Navy, the other a State

Department employee, from January to April

1972.

3. All materials; including memorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

ermination of technical surveillance of

Yeoman Radford's step-father in Oregon from

February to April 1972.

4.

All materials summarizing the results of the

technical

surveillances described in items 1

through 3

above.

5.

Ald materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the summary described in item 4

above.

C. With respect to surreptitious entries carried out

by the FBI from January 1, 1960 to the present, all

materials pertaining to the following:

1. The date, place, target, and purpose of each

entry;

2. The request and authorization for each entry

including the identities of the agencies

and/or individuals who requestea and/or

authorized the entry;

3. The procedures and methods used for the

conduct of each entry;

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 285

---

## Page 286

-8 -

"JEK

4.

The results of each entry, including the

information obtained

and, the identities of

the agencies and/or individuals to whom the

information was disseminated.

5.

The materials in l through 4 above which may

pertain to any surreptitious entry directed

'at

the following targets:

7.

b.

C.

in Washington D.C. (1960)

in Seattle, Washington (1957?,1364.

Daniel Ellsberg, Mill Valley, California (1973,1974;

d. Gerald Lefcourt, New York City (1970, 1971)

e. Charles Garry, Oakland, California (1970, 1971)

f. Egbal Ahmed, Chicago (1970)

g. United States Servicemen's Fund, Boston (1971)

h. NAACP Legal Defense Fund, New York City (1971)

i. Marvin Kalb, CBS News (1972, 1973)

j. Dan Rather, CBS News (1972, 1973)

k. Sol Linowitz (1972)

1. Institute of Policy Studies, Washington.D.C. (1971)

m. Michael Kennedy, San Franciso (1969, 1970)

Radical Education Project and SDS, Ann Arbor, Michigi

(1969)

o. Carol Wild Scott, Gainsville, Florida (1972)

p. Henry di Suvero, New York City (1972)

9. The Washington Free Press, Washington, D.C. (1969)

I. The home of a "known bigot... (who) might (have

been) plotting violence against Jewish leaders,"

referred to in Jack Anderson's column in the

Washington Post of June 21, 1975.

NW 65360 Docid:32989627 Page 286

---

## Page 287

-9-

D.

Materials pertaining to any jurisdictional agree-

ments, agreements of coordination, or other agree-

ments between the FEI and any other federal, state

or local agency with regard to the conduct of and

dissemination of information from surreptitious

entries.

2.

The following materials pertaining to NSA watch list

activity, reportecly in operation from late 1967

through

1973, which involved the monitoring of

international communications that were addressed

to, or from, or included the names of persons on

a

changing "watch list"

1. All materials pertaining to the proposing,

approving, putting names on, executing,

evaluating, or terminating the watch list

activity;

2.

All materials (including correspondence) sent

by the FBI to the National security Agency or

other entity in the Department of Defense

listing names

for the watch list or otherwise

commenting on the activity;

3. Any internal FBI materials produced as part of

the activity;

4. Any NSA Or Department of Defense materials

(including correspondence and reports) regard-

ing the watch list activity sent to the FBI.

F.

Materials pertaining to the authorization for FBI

contacts with, dissemination of FbI information to,

receipt of information from, and requests by the

FEI

for action by the Special Services Staff of

the Internal Revenue Service.

G. "The Handbook of Technical Equipment".

H. Materials pertaining to FBI activity with respect to

the National Environmental Teach-In (also known as

"Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

I. Materials pertaining to the origin and implication of

any decision to gather intelligence on "riomen's

Liberation" in the Philadelphia FBI field office

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 JPage:287969 to the present.

---

## Page 288

- 10 -

J. The additional SAC letters and memoranda identified

on

the attached list.

к.

The performance ratings (Form FD 185) of the

following current or former FBI employees:

1. George Berley

2. Wilfred Bergeron

• 3.

William D. Campbell

4. Richard Suter

5. William Tucker

6.

7,

Terry O'Connor

Joseph English

I.

The current office assignment or last known address

of the individuals

listed in

• K. above.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 288

---

## Page 289

IBS

SECRETE

August 5, 1975

REQUESE FOR FBI MATERIALS

I.

7S

Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Monday, August 11, 1975:

A.. The notebook of binder containing materials on the

FBI

legal authority and maintained in the Office of

the Special Counsel.

B.

Materials pertaining to FBI-CIA relations in 1970•

previously made accessible at FBIHQ in excised.

form; unexcised versions of the memoranda bearing:

the item-number designations 8, 9, 30, 32, and 37.

c.

"Foreign Operations Policy Manual," previously

made accessible at rBIMo.

D.

Inspection Reports on the Intelligence Division

and the San Francisco Field Office, as

currently

sanitized.

ist.

NOT RECORDEO

Ã4 AUG 12 197:

5 filied

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 289

---

## Page 290

- 2-

II. Materials to which the SSC staff has been given access;

delivery requested by Friday, August 15, 1975:

A.

The following materials maintained in the so-

called "Official and Confidential" files and

designated

"non-derogatory," previously examined

by SSC staff:

1. Agreement between FBI and Secret Service;

2. Attorney General - Submission of Memoranda by

FBI;

3. "Black Bag" Jobs;

4. Expansion oì FBI Föreign Intelligence: : : -

Coverage:

5. Intelligence Coverage - Domestic and

Foreign;

6. Directives (60) :

7. Cook, Fred (52).

B. Summaries or notes on interviews conducted by

Inspection Division for July 3 Inspection for

the individuals whose names are underscored on

the attached list (slightly expanded from previous

access reguests) .

-NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 290

---

## Page 291

-3 -

III.

Newly requested materials; delivery requested by

Monüay, August 11, 1975:

A. All of Section 8 of the Manual of Instructions.

B. Sections 1, 6, 7II, 7J, SI, and 14F of the Manual

of Pules and Regulations.

C. Superseding versions of Section 6 of the Manual

of Pules

and Regulations, since January 1, 1960.

D. = The following materials referred to in memoranda

previously delivered to SSC regarding FBI

legal attaches:

1. Memoranda of #iC. Sullivan of June F, I97T,

and June 16, 1971;

2.

Menoranda of Mr. Wannall of May 27, 1971, and

May 29: 1971:

3.

Letter of Hoover to the President dated

September 21, 1970;

4.

Memorandum of w. C. Sullivan dated September

22, 1970

5.

Menorandun of Mr. Brennan dated September 21

1970;

6.

Menorandum of Mr. Child of May 23, 1969;

7.

Recommendations of Dalby, Felt, and Beaver

unon the recommendation made in memorandum

of sullivan of June 7, 1971:

8.

Material pertaining to an inspection of all

FBI foreign liaison posts conducted in 1971

pursuant to instructions from Hoover to

Assistant Director Ponder in charge of

inspections.

I. Materials pertaining to the origin, operation, and

termination of the Mass Media Program implementea by

the

former FBI Crime Records Division.

-

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 291

---

## Page 292

-4 -

F. Materials pertaining to the establishment and

functions of the FBI External Affairs Division.

G. "Guide to Indexing" and "Rules Pertaining to

the General Index"

, cited at p. 14, Volume 1,

of the Classifying Instructor's Guide.

Fl. "The Standard Sub List"

I. The following materials pertaining to Project

INLET:

5.

,I. Materials reflecting approval. of the

Project on or about November 20, 1969.

2. Inspection Report referred to in SAC letter

Of Decerber 26, 1972.

3.

Letter from FBI to Congressman Les Aspin

in 1973

3 regarding the Project..

Materials pertaining to the policies ana procedures

of the FBI

£or the use of FBI agents for so-called

"undercover"

activity.

The current address and assignment of Special Agent

(or former Special Agent) John Kunkle, who was assigned

to the Bureau's Havaii office in 1955.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 292

---

## Page 293

- 5 -

IV.

Newly requested materials; delivery requested by

Friday, August 18, 1975:

A.

The

following materials referred to in memoranãa

previously delivered to SSC regarding FBI Legal

Attaches:

1.

2.

3.

4.

Materials pertaining to conversations

between the President and Hoover regarding

foreign liaison operations in September

1970;

Materials pertaining to conversations between

DI. Kissinger and Hoover in December 1970;

Materials pertaining to communications between

the FBI and the State Department regarding.

foreign liaison operations in 1970%

Materials pertaining to a conference with the

President regarding

foreign liaison operations

in June 1971.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 293

---

## Page 294

- 6 -

V.

Newly requested materials; access to screen

for

delivery requested by August 19, 1975:

A.

JEK ACt SIg) (?) (D)

The following materials pertaining to Mrs.

Claire (Anna) Chennault and Spiro I. Agnew:

1. All materials pertaining to the authorization

or re-authorization by the President or the

Attorney General of têchnical

1 surveillance of

in Washington,

D.C. in 1968.

2.

All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and "tele-

phone checks"

Of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault

in November 1968..

3. All materials pertaining to the initiation,

authorization, conduct, and termination of

technical or physical surveillance and

"telephone checks" of Vice Presidential

candidate Spiro I. Agnew in November 1968.

4.

All materials

summarizing the results of tech-

nical or physical surveillance, incluäing

incidental overhearings, and "telephone

checks" of Mrs. Claire (Anna) Chennault and

Spiro I. Agnew

in Novemoer 1969, but not

including "logs".

5. All materials pertaining to White House

instructions to the FBI for the handling of

the sunmary letters describad in item 4 above.

6. All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as

a rosult of information

contained in the

surnary letters described in

item 4 above.

7.

The current addresses of the following former

Special Agents, who may have particivated in the

technical or physical surveillance or "telephone

checks"

of Mrs. Claire, (Anna) Chennault or

Spiro T. Agnew:

---

a. Phil Claridge

b. William Jackson

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 294

---

## Page 295

- 7 -

-

B. The following materials pertaining to Yeoman

Charles E. Radford:

1. All materials,

including' memorializations

of oral cormunications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, and

termination of technical

surveillances of

Yeoman Charles E. Radfora fron December

1971 to June 1972.

2. All materials, including memorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

authorization, initiation, conduct, ano

termination of technical surveillance of

two close personal friends of Yeoman Radford,

one retired fron the Navy, the other a State

Department employee, from January to April

1972.

3. All materials: including memorializations

of oral communications, pertaining to the

initiation, conduct; anc

technical

surveillance of

Yeoman Radford's step-father in Oregon from

February to April 1972.

4.

All materials summarizing the results of the

¿echnical surveillances

described in items 1

through 3 above.

5. All materials pertaining to actions taken by

the White House as a result of information

contained in the sunmary described in item 4

above.

C.

With respect to surreptitious entries carried out

oy the FBi Iron Jaruary l. 1950 to the prosent, all

naterials pertaining to the rollowina:

1. The date, place, target, and purpose of each

entry;

2.

The request and authorization for each entry

including the identities of the agencies

and/or individuals who requestea

and/or

authorized the entry;

3. The procedures and methods used for the

conduct of each entry;

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 295

---

## Page 296

- 8 -

4.

5.

(9) 12)(D)

The results of each entry, including the

information obtained and, the identities of

the agencies and/or individuals to whom the

information was disseminated.

The materials in 1 through 4 above which may

pertain to any surreptitious entry directed

'at the following targets:

in Washington D.C. (1960)

b.

in Seattle, Washington (1957?, 136:

c.

Daniel Ellsberg, Mill Valley, California (1973, 1974

d. Gerald Lefcourt, New York City (1970, 1971)

e. Charles Carry, Oakland, California T1970, 1971)

£. Egbal Ahmed: Chicaço (1970)

g. United States Serviceren's Funã, Boston (1971)

h. NAACP Legal Defense Fund, New York City (1971)

1. Marvin Kalb, CBS News (1972, 1973)

j. Dan Rather, CBS News (1972, 1973)

k. S01 Linowitz (1972)

1. Institute of Policy Studies, Washington.D.C. (1971).

m. Michael Kennedy, San Franciso (1969, 1979)

n.

Radical Education Project and SDS, Ann Arbor, Michiy

(1969)

0. Carol Wild Scott, Gainsville: Florida (1972)

E. Henry dl suvero, dew York City (1972)

a. The Washington Free Press, Washington, D.C.. (1969)

I.

The home of a "known bigot... (who) might (have

been) plotting violence against Jewish leaders,"

referred to in Jack Anderson's column in the

Washington Post of June 21, 1975.

NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 296

---

## Page 297

- 9 -

D.

Materials pertaining to any jurisdictional agree-

ments,

agreements of coordination, or other agree-

ments between the

FEI and any other federal, state

or local agency with regard to the conduct of and

dissemination of information from surreptitious

entries.

Ine following materials pertaining to NSA watch list

¡activity, reportedly in operation from late 1967

through 1973, which involved the monitoring of

international conmunications that were addressed

to, or from, or included the names of persons on

a changing

"watch list"

:

I...

All materials pertaining to the proposing

approving, putting names on; executing,

evaluating, or terminating the watch list

activity;

All materials (including correspondence) sent

by the FbI to the llational security Agency or

any

other entity in the Department of Defense

listing names for the watch list or otherwise

commenting on the activity;

3 .

Any internal FBI materials produced as part of

the activity;

4. Any NSA Or Department Of Defense materials

(including correspondence and reports) regard-

ing

the watch list activity sent to the FBI.

F. Materials pertaining

to the authorization for FBI

contacts with. dissemination of FBI. information to,

recript of inforation from, and requests by the

NEI for action by the Special Services Staff of

the Internal Revenue Service.

G. "The Handbook of Technical Equipment"

H. Materials pertaining to FBI activity with respect to

the National Environmental Teach-In (also known as-

"Earth Day"), April 22, 1970.

I.

Materials pertaining to the origin and implication of

any decision to gather intelligence on "lomen's

Liberation" in the Philacelphia FDI field office

NW 65360 Docid:32989627 Page 23969 to the present.

---

## Page 298

- 10 -

J. The additional SAC letters and memoranda.

identified

on the attached list.

K. The performance ratings (Form FD 185) of the

following current or former FBI employees:

1. George Berley

2. Wilfred Bergeron

• 3. William D. Campbell

4. Richard Suter

5. William Tucker

6.

Terry O'Connor

7,

Joseph English

1.

The current office assignment or last known address

of the individuals

listed in

K.

above.

_NW 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 298

---

## Page 299

MAY 1262 EDITION

GSA GEM, REG. NO, 27

UNITED STATES GO: ERNMENT

1 - Mr.

Adams

Menoranuum

1

- Mr.

J

Mintz

1 - Mr. W.

R. Wannall

TO

Me. W. R. Wannalz a SElkies

DATE: 8/ 1/75

Nor

FROM W. O. Greeny?

1 - Mr. S. S. Mignosa

1

- Mr. W. O. Cregar

1 - Mr. I. J. McNiff

SUBJECT: SENSTUDY 75

POT/FAT 293030

ATTATA

CIVIL ACT

1. 0. 7 12356

PURPOSE:

DATE 17-19-88 INITIRES EM

STIS CATS

To advise of receipt of uncorroborated information!

from Philadelphia Office to the effect that a Staff Member:..

of the Church Committee reportedly, without authorization, Xeroxed

a CIA document in possession of the Committee for subsequent

transmittal to Congressman Morris Udall.

DETAILS:

Assas. Dir.

Dep. AU adr

Due Aunt

Ans.", Dira:

Admir.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Cair.-

ldont.ju

nargitio

Laboratory

Plan. & Evol...

Training -

Lagal Coun..-

Talaphone Ris.

10-10-00

ALA INFORMATION CONTAINED

HE :2

AS UNCLASSIFIED

EX'E'T WHERE SHOWN

SCHERWISE

Nevg530GDodyd180939627 Page 299

Senstudy is acronym for Senate Select Committee on

Intelligence Activities (SSC), also known as Church Committee,

which Committee is looking into operations of members of the

intelligence community.

By teletype 7/30/75, our Philadelphia Office advised

that one Robert Thweat, a

retired United States Navy Commander,

had made available information he received from an unnamed

relative. This relative told him that one Daniel O'Flaherty,

who is employed with the Church Committee, had on an unknown

date removed from his work area, by hiding underneath his shirt,

Heaty Jenkong anenty ten dato into matton du senatos

provided the Xeroxed copy to an unknown person for subseques!

transmittal to Congressman Morris Udall. According to Thri:

O'Flaherty had personally related the above information to iis

relative and reportedly had also related the incident to a

Mr. Katz, a former associate who is currently a professor al

the University of Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee. Katz

62-116305

62-116395-

TJM:1hblhb

12-19-88

Classified

by

SPIAE/GM .

Declassify

SEE ADDENDUM; PG.

ROUTE IN ENVELOPE

SECRE!

11704317

CONT ALOVER 19715

---

## Page 300

SESHEF

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re: Senstudy 75

62-116395

reportedly voiced his displeasure to O'Flaherty stating he

did not approve of the latter's action. The memorandum in

question dealt with CIA's possible use of derogatory information

o determine the direction Senator Jackson would take in futur

ictions he might encounter which might involve CIA activity sp

Thweat advised he would recontact his relative to determine if

this individual would come forward, reveal his identity and

be cooperative in any investigation.

A memorandum from CIA dated 7/29/75 indicates that

James Daniel O'Flaherty, born 11/4/42, is a member of the Staff

• of SSC and has been granted a security clearance up to "Top Secret

On the morning of 7/31/75, Philadelphia Office was

telephonically contacted and instructed to expedite a contact

with Thweat to deterrine the availability of his relative. At

approximately 2:30 p.m., 7/31/75, Philadelphia Office advised

that Thweat, upon recontact, had stated that it would be impossible

to contact his relative before this coming weekend. In conver-

sation, he identified his relative as a niece

who is currently

attending school in Nashington, D. C..

He further advised that

O'Flaherty reportedly is no longer residing with his wife and

is engaged in an emotional relationship with his niece. Thweat

added he believed his niece would be cooperative as she has

expressed her disapproval of O'Flaherty's action. He concluded

by saying that upon determination of his niece's decision in

this

regard he would immediately advise the Philadelphia office.

OBSERVATIONS:

The above information, if accurate, represents a

serious violation of the

agreerent regarding confidentiality

existing between the SSC and members of the intelligence commu-

nity as it relates to material being turned over or made

available to Staff Members of the Committee. It is incumbent

PROTECT

CONTITUED - OVER

= 2=

EW 65360 Boctd:32339627 Page 300

---

## Page 301

Memorandum to Mr.

W. R. Wannall

Re:

'Senstudy 75

62-116395

upon this Bureau to make the above information available at

the earliest logical time and in the most complete form

possible to the Department, CIA, and Senators Frank Church

Departme sc.

and John G. Iower of the SSC. Accordingly, an interview by

Bureau Agents of Thweat's niece, if she agrees to cooperate,

would appear desirable before initiating any action on the

basis of information received to date.

Additionally, it is not known at this time whether

or not the document reportedly Xeroxed by O'Flaherty is

classified. In our continuing inquiry into this matter,

attempts will be made to identify document, determine whether

it contains classified information and ascertain whether or

not a violation of Federal statutes exists.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That contact be maintained with the Philadelphia

Office to insure that the desired information concerning

Thweat's niece be expeditiously obtained. If she agrees to

cooperate, she will be immediately interviewed and pertinent

information obtained

furnished, via established liaison

channels, to the Department, CIA, and Senators Church and Tower.

Appropriate field offices will be instructed to conduct

necessary investigation to corroborate the information and

to determine if a possible violation of Federal statutes has

been committed.

*A* 717S

- 3

CONTINUED - OVER

NW 65360* Docld:32989627 Page 301

---

## Page 302

JAUTR

Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall

Re:

Senstudy 75'

62-116395

2. If Thweat's niece declines cooperativeness,

pertinent information obtained thus far will, in memorandum

form

concealing identity of source, be furnished via

established liaison channels to the Department, CIA, and

Senators Church and Tower.

Additionally, a lead will be

sent to the Memphis Office to interview Professor Katz at

the University of Vanderbilt in an attempt to corroborate

the allegation.

TIM

This shoul

tsier firs

Finch contacte

pet.

Stel Tilie

ESCREF

4

BERN 65360 Docld:32989627 Page 302

---

## Page 303

ADDENDUM

PAUL I. MACK mah

8/5/75

The Intelligence Division advised Philadelphia Office

telephonically informed FBIHQ on 8/5/75 that Thweat had returned to

Philadelphia from seeing his niece and indicated she would talk to the

FBI on the condition that she would go to Philadelphia about 8/22/75

to talk to the Agent who is a personal friend of Thweat and to whom

he initially confided the information regarding this matter. Philadelphia

was advised in view of the time lag a more preferable alternative

would be for WFO Agents to contact the niece or as another alternative the

Philadelphia Agent would travel to Washington, D. C., to conduct

the interview. Philadelphia was requested to expeditiously recontact

Thweat concerning the above possibilities.

- 5 -

spinal

NW 65360 Dold: 32989627 Page 303

---

## Page 304

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10

MAY 1962 EDITION

GSA GEN. REG. NO. 27

UNITED STATES

NMENT

Memorandum

:Mr.

•FROM :W.

0. Cregar woe

SUBJECT UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE

ON INTELLIGENCE- ACTIVITIES (SSC)

1 - Mr.

E.

Walsh

2 - Mr. J. A. Mintz

(Mr. J. B. Hotis)

1 - Mr. W. R. Wannall

DATE: 7/31/75

I - Mr. W. 0. Cregar

1 - Mr. R. L. Moore

Assoc. Dir. -

Dep. AD Adm. -

Dep. AD Inv. -

Asst. Dir.:

Admin.

Comp. Syst.

Ext. Affairs

Files & Com. w

Gen. Inv. -

Ident.

Inspection -

Intell.

Laboratory

Legal Coun..

Plan. & Eval. -

Spec. Inv. -

Training

Telephone Rm. -

This is to recommend that the Administrative DIvIsIon

provide a copy the foreign operations Policy Manual, to bel

reviewed by the Intellisence Division before presentation to

the SSC for its review.

The 7/28/75 communication from the SSC contains on

page 4, request IV C, which asks for "The Manual for the Legal

Attaches."

The SSC requested access to this Manual for the

purpose of "access to screen for delivery requested by Friday

August 1, 1975."

This Manual will not be delivered to the SSC for its

permanent retention at this time, however, the soc may later

request the copy for its permanent retention. This Manual

should be reviewed by the Liaison Section, Intelligence Division,

prior to being made available to the SSC and if necessary,

deletions from the Manual will be made and the SSC will be

advised of the general nature of the deletions.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the Administrative Division make available to

the Intelligence Division one copy of the Foreign Operations

Policy Manual for review prior to its being made available to

the sse.

Wi/fuL REC-102

500

RIM :mam

(6)

RLM

ta: Avo 11 1975

Ananual #10

talent dier cons

7-3155

Bellips

5'

TAFORMATION CONTAINE C

TEN 78 280022505729

b4: 10110/00SP2 ALMI7TG

1W 6556 AUG 13.1975

ocld:32989627 Page 30

---