Development Review Board — Burlington, VT
Date: 2026-03-25
Time: 17:00

Development Review Board
 Wednesday, March 25, 2026, 5:00 PM

645 Pine Street, Front Conference Room or Remote on Zoom:
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83225696227?pwd=SGQ0bTdnS000Wkc3c2J4WWw1dzMxUT09
Webinar ID: 832 2569 6227
Passcode: 969186
Telephone: US +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782
or +1 346 248 7799
1. Agenda

2. Communications

3. Minutes

4. Consent
 4.1.
 ZP-26-54; 49 Henderson Terrace (RL, Ward 6) Elizabeth Halpern / Alex Halpern
 Proposed replacement of an existing garage with a new garage. (Project Manager, Mary O’Neil)

 4.2.
 ZP-26-42; 5 Crescent Road (RL, Ward 6) Robert Stumler / Jane Dunbar
 Proposed establishment of bakery home occupation. (Project Manager, Kirk Dressing)

 4.3.
 ZP-25-615; 72-74 Cedar Street (RM, Ward 2) Lois Grimard / Bradley Grimard
 Proposed establishment of a pottery home occupation. (Project Manager, Kirk Dressing)

5. Public Hearing
 5.1.
 ZP-26-69; 125 Lakeside Avenue (E-LM, Ward 5) Ride Your Bike, LLC / John Caulo
 Final plat application for 3-lot subdivision. (Project Manager, Scott Gustin)

6. Certificate of Appropriateness
 6.1.
  ZP-25-378; 451 Appletree Point Road (RL, Ward 4) Jamie Spano
  Proposed after-the-fact tree removal and replacement/extension of deteriorated seawall. (Project
  Manager, Scott Gustin)

7. Adjournment

8. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements
  8.1.
  Plans may be viewed upon request by contacting the Department of Permitting & Inspections between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
  p.m. Participation in the DRB proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. Please note that ANYTHING
  submitted to the Zoning office is considered public and cannot be kept confidential. This may not be the final order in which items will
  be heard. Please view final Agenda, at www.burlingtonvt.gov/dpi/drb/agendas or the office notice board, one week before the hearing
  for the order in which items will be heard.

  The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious affiliation, race, color,
  national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive
  status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City is also committed to providing proper access to services, facilities, and
  employment opportunities. For accessibility information or alternative formats, please contact Human Resources Department at (802) 540-
  2505.

Development Review Board
 Wednesday, March 25, 2026, 5:00 PM

645 Pine Street, Front Conference Room or Remote on Zoom:
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83225696227?pwd=SGQ0bTdnS000Wkc3c2J4WWw1dzMxUT09
Webinar ID: 832 2569 6227
Passcode: 969186
Telephone: US +1 929 205 6099 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782
or +1 346 248 7799
1. Agenda

2. Communications

3. Minutes

4. Consent
 4.1.
 ZP-26-54; 49 Henderson Terrace (RL, Ward 6) Elizabeth Halpern / Alex Halpern
 Proposed replacement of an existing garage with a new garage. (Project Manager, Mary O’Neil)

 4.2.
 ZP-26-42; 5 Crescent Road (RL, Ward 6) Robert Stumler / Jane Dunbar
 Proposed establishment of bakery home occupation. (Project Manager, Kirk Dressing)

 4.3.
 ZP-25-615; 72-74 Cedar Street (RM, Ward 2) Lois Grimard / Bradley Grimard
 Proposed establishment of a pottery home occupation. (Project Manager, Kirk Dressing)

5. Public Hearing
 5.1.
 ZP-26-69; 125 Lakeside Avenue (E-LM, Ward 5) Ride Your Bike, LLC / John Caulo
 Final plat application for 3-lot subdivision. (Project Manager, Scott Gustin)

6. Certificate of Appropriateness
 6.1.




 Page 1 of 85
  ZP-25-378; 451 Appletree Point Road (RL, Ward 4) Jamie Spano
  Proposed after-the-fact tree removal and replacement/extension of deteriorated seawall. (Project
  Manager, Scott Gustin)

7. Adjournment

8. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements
  8.1.
  Plans may be viewed upon request by contacting the Department of Permitting & Inspections between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
  p.m. Participation in the DRB proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. Please note that ANYTHING
  submitted to the Zoning office is considered public and cannot be kept confidential. This may not be the final order in which items will
  be heard. Please view final Agenda, at www.burlingtonvt.gov/dpi/drb/agendas or the office notice board, one week before the hearing
  for the order in which items will be heard.

  The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious affiliation, race, color,
  national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive
  status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City is also committed to providing proper access to services, facilities, and
  employment opportunities. For accessibility information or alternative formats, please contact Human Resources Department at (802) 540-
  2505.




 Page 2 of 85
 William Ward, Director
Department of Permitting and Inspections Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
645 Pine Street Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner
Burlington, VT 05401 Collin Naheedy, Zoning Compliance Officer
 Joseph Cava, Planning Technician
https://www.burlingtonvt.gov/439/Zoning-Division
Telephone: 802.865-7188
 802.865.7195 (Fax)

 MEMORANDUM

 To: Development Review Board
 From: Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
 Date: March 25, 2026
 RE: ZP-26-54; 49 Henderson Terrace
 Note: These are staff comments only. Decisions on projects are made by the Development
 Review Board, which may approve, deny, table or modify any project. THE APPLICANT
 OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND THE MEETING.

 File: ZP-26-54
 Location: 49 Henderson Terrace
 Zone: RL Ward: 6
 Applicant/ Owner: Alex Halpern
 Request: Proposed replacement of an existing garage with a new garage.
 Background:
 • Zoning Permit 11-0374CA; Add two stone patios,
 wood deck, and lattic fence with gate. October 2010.
 • Zoning Permit 08-757BA; add one window and
 enlarge another window, add deck, demolish and
 rebuild garage. May 2008. [This permit was never
 closed out nor relinquished.]
 • Zoning Permit 81-546; construct a 6’ x 8’ shelter
 over existing stairs. June 1981.
 • Building Permit 54-64 issued for construction of
 new garage. October 1953.
 • Request to move garage. Neighbor objection; request withdrawn. New request to erect
 a new garage in new location. October 1953.
 Overview:
 The existing garage at 49 Hendersen Terrace was constructed in 1953. The inclusion of 49
 Hendersen Terrace within the Historic Sites and Structures Survey of 2005 within the Prospect
 Park North survey area has thrust this parcel into historic structure review of Section 5.4.8.
 One line in the narrative: One-bay garage is the source of the inclusion for this review. The
 original building permit defines aluminum siding and asphalt shingle roofing; both which remain
 today. No building description is included within the HS&S survey to support its historic merit.
 A permit was issued for its replacement in 2008, but no Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
 and it the work was never done.


 The programs and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. For accessibility
 information call 865-7188 (for TTY users 865-7142).

 Page 3 of 85
 Recommended motion: Consent approval of Conditional Use and Certificate of
 Appropriateness, per the following Findings and Conditions:

 I. Findings

Article 3: Applications, Permits, and Project Reviews
Part 5: Conditional Use and Major Impact Review
Section 3.5.2 Applicability
 (a) Conditional Use Review
 Required for a request to demolish a historic structure per Section 5.4.8 (d) 2.

Sec. 3.5.6 Review Criteria
(a) Conditional Use Review Standards:
 Approval shall be granted only if the DRB, after public notice and public hearing,
 determines that the proposed conditional use and associated development shall not result
 in an undue adverse effect on each of the following general standards:
 1. Existing or planned public utilities, facilities or services are capable of
 supporting the proposed use in addition to the existing uses in the area;
 There is no impact to existing or planned public utilities. Affirmative finding.
 2. The character of the area affected as defined by the purpose or purposes of the
 zoning district(s) within which the project is located, and specifically stated
 policies and standards of the municipal development plan;
 Hendersen Terrace is a developed residential area. A replacement garage shall
 not impact the residential character of the area. Affirmative finding.
 3. The proposed use will not have nuisance impacts from noise, odor, dust, heat, and
 vibrations greater than typically generated by other permitted uses in the same
 zoning district;
 There are no identified nuisance impacts with the replacement of a residential
 garage. Affirmative finding.
 4. The transportation system is capable of supporting the proposed use in addition
 to the existing uses in the area. Evaluation factors include street designations
 and capacity; level of service and other performance measures; access to arterial
 roadways; connectivity; transit availability; parking and access; impacts on
 pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation; safety for all modes; and adequate
 transportation demand management strategies;
 There are no negative impacts to the local transportation system. Affirmative
 finding.
 and,
 5. The utilization of renewable energy resources;
 There is no hindrance in the potential use of renewable energy resources.
 Affirmative finding.
 and,


Memorandum to the Development Review Board 2

 Page 4 of 85
 6. Any standards or factors set forth in existing City bylaws and city and state
 ordinances;
 The applicant shall abide by best practices in material abatement and disposal as
 required by law. Affirmative finding as conditioned.

(C) Conditions of Approval:
 In addition to imposing conditions of approval necessary to satisfy the General Standards
 specified in (a) or (b) above, the DRB may also impose additional conditions of approval
 relative to any of the following:
 1. Mitigation measures, including but not limited to screening, landscaping, where
 necessary to reduce noise and glare and to maintain the property in a character in
 keeping with the surrounding area.
 There are no identified impacts from a replacement garage that might require
 mitigation. Not applicable.
 2. Time limits for construction.
 The standard life of a zoning permit is three years. If the applicant wishes to phase
 the project, they may make the request of the DRB. Otherwise, the typical three-year
 time limit will apply. Affirmative finding as conditioned.
 3. Hours of operation and/or construction to reduce the impacts on surrounding
 properties. Hours of construction are limited to M-F 7:30 am to 5:30 pm. Saturday
 construction is limited to interior work. There shall be no construction activities on
 Sundays. Affirmative finding as conditioned.
 4. That any future enlargement or alteration of the use return for review to the DRB to
 permit the specifying of new conditions;
 Any future alteration will be reviewed under the standards in effect at the time of
 application. Affirmative finding as conditioned.
 and,
 5. Such additional reasonable performance standards, conditions and safeguards, as it
 may deem necessary to implement the purposes of this chapter and the zoning
 regulations.
 This is at the discretion of the DRB.

Article 4: Zoning Maps and Districts

Table 4.4.5-1
 RL Min Lot Front setback Side setback Rear setback Lot coverage
 Frontage 30’ Avg. of front 10% lot width 20’ 45%
 setback 2 or avg. of side
 adjacent lots on setbck of 2
 both sides +/- 5’ adjacent lots on
 both sides




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 3

 Page 5 of 85
 49 Hendersen Existing 74’ Existing 14.65’ Existing 5’6” 68.95’ (garage) 27.5 existing
 Terrace Proposed 22’ Proposed 5’* (Required: 5’ 32.5 proposed
 accessory
 structure)
*Acceptable per Section 5.2.5 (b) 5. Accessory Structures and Parking Areas
Affirmative finding.


Article 5: Citywide General Regulations
Section 5.2.2 Required Frontage or Access
Pre-existing at 74’. See Table 4.4.5-1, above.

Section 5.2.3 Lot Coverage
See Table 4.4.5-1.

Section 5.2.4 Buildable Area Calculation & Steep Slopes Overlay District
The property does not exceed 2 acres, excluding it from Buildable area review.
The parcel is not within the Steep Slopes Overlay. Not applicable.

Section 5.2.5 Setbacks
See Table 4.4.5-1, above.

Section 5.2.6 Building Height Limits
The proposed replacement garage has a height less than 15’; qualifying as an accessory structure
that may enjoy a minimum 5’ side yard setback. Affirmative finding.

Section 5.2.7 Density Calculations
No change is proposed to the existing unit count. Not applicable.

Section 5.4.8 Historic Buildings and Sites
The City seeks to preserve, maintain, and enhance those aspects of the city having historical,
architectural, archaeological, and cultural merit. Specifically, these regulations seek to achieve
the following goals:
To preserve, maintain and enhance Burlington’s historic character, scale, architectural
integrity, and cultural resources;
To foster the preservation of Burlington’s historic and cultural resources as part of an attractive,
vibrant, and livable community in which to live, work and visit;
To promote a sense of community based on understanding the city’s historic growth and
development, and maintaining the city’s sense of place by protecting its historic and cultural
resources; and,
To promote the adaptive re-use of historic buildings and sites.

(a) Applicability:
These regulations shall apply to all buildings and sites in the city that are listed, or eligible for
listing, on the State or National Register of Historic Places.



Memorandum to the Development Review Board 4

 Page 6 of 85
49 Henderson Terrace was included within the 2005 Historic Sites and Structures Survey, Prospect
Park North. Within that structural narrative the garage is acknowledged, but no building
description was provided, nor any supporting information about historic merit of the accessory
structure. This garage is not contemporary with the (c. 1930) home.

(b) Standards and Guidelines
1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal
 change to its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
 The principal structure will remain. The garage is proposed for replacement. There are no
 distinctive characteristics of the garage that merit extraordinary measures.

2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of
 distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that
 characterize a property will be avoided.
 The garage was built in 1953; simple in construction and lacking refinement. As originally
 constructed, it has an asphalt shingle roof and aluminum siding.

3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes
 that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or
 elements from other historic properties, will not be undertaken.
 The garage is a rudimentary single car structure with aluminum siding.

4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be
 retained and preserved.
 None identified.

5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
 craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.
 There are no notable materials, features, finishes or construction techniques present in the
 existing garage.

6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of
 deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old
 in design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials recognizing that new technologies
 may provide an appropriate alternative in order to adapt to ever changing conditions and
 provide for an efficient contemporary use. Replacement of missing features will be
 substantiated by documentary and physical evidence.
 Repair is not requested. The application is for wholesale replacement of the garage, which is
 only included within the Historic Sites and Structures Survey as an associated structure.
 While the principal residence is approximately 1930, the garage was constructed in 1953 and
 retains no notable characteristics or features.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 5

 Page 7 of 85
7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means
 possible. Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used.
 Not applicable.

8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be
 disturbed, mitigation measures will be undertaken.
 There are no identified archaeological resources at this location.

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic
 materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work
 shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials,
 features, size, scale, and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and
 its environment.
 The removal of this garage of dubious historic value has no impact on the integrity of the
 principal structure, which has an earlier date of construction and represents an identifiable
 architectural style of greater distinction.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner
 that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its
 environment would be unimpaired.
 While unlikely, the proposed new garage could be removed in the future without impacting
 the integrity of the principal structure.
 Affirmative finding with DRB concurrence.


(d) Demolition of Historic Buildings:
 The purpose of this subsection is:
 • To discourage the demolition of a historic building, and allow full consideration of
 alternatives to demolition, including rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, resale, or
 relocation;
 • Provide a procedure and criteria regarding the consideration of a proposal for the
 demolition of a historic building; and,
 • To ensure that the community is compensated for the permanent loss of a historic
 resource by a redevelopment of clear and substantial benefit to the community,
 region or state.

1. Application for Demolition.
 For demolition applications involving a historic building, the applicant shall
 submit the following materials in addition to the submission requirements
 specified in Art. 3:
 A. A report from a licensed engineer or architect who is experienced in
 rehabilitation of historic structures regarding the soundness of the structure
 and its suitability for rehabilitation;


Memorandum to the Development Review Board 6

 Page 8 of 85
 The applicant/owner is an architect. The limited area and function of the
 structure are the basis for its replacement.
 B. A statement addressing compliance with each applicable review standard for
 demolition;
 Although the structure warranted a notation within the Historic Sites and
 Structures Survey, no narrative defining historic merit was included. Without
 further definition or assurance of its appropriate designation as a historic
 structure, further application of the standards is uncertain.
 C. Where a case for economic hardship is claimed, an economic feasibility
 report prepared by an architect, developer, or appraiser, or other person
 experienced in the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic structures that
 addresses:
 (i) the estimated market value of the property on which the structure lies, both
 before and after demolition or removal; and,
 (ii) the feasibility of rehabilitation or reuse of the structure proposed for
 demolition or partial demolition;
 D. A redevelopment plan for the site, and a statement of the effect of the
 proposed redevelopment on the architectural and historical qualities of other
 structures and the character of the neighborhood around the sites;
 The application includes site details, foundation plans, elevations and roof
 plan for a replacement garage. Affirmative finding.
 and,
 E. Elevations, drawings, plans, statements, and other materials which satisfy the
 submission requirements specified in Art. 3, for any replacement structure or
 structures to be erected or constructed pursuant to a development plan.
 The application includes full redevelopment plans after the removal of the
 existing 1953 one car garage. Affirmative finding.

2. Standards for Review of Demolition.
 Demolition of a historic structure shall only be approved by the DRB pursuant to
 the provisions of Art. 3, Part 5 for Conditional Use Review and in accordance
 with the following standards:
 A. The structure proposed for demolition is structurally unsound despite ongoing
 efforts by the owner to properly maintain the structure; or,
 B. The structure cannot be rehabilitated or reused on site as part of any
 economically beneficial use of the property in conformance with the intent
 and requirements of the underlying zoning district; and, the structure cannot
 be practicably moved to another site within the district; or,




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 7

 Page 9 of 85
 C. The proposed redevelopment of the site will provide a substantial community-
 wide benefit that outweighs the historic or architectural significance of the
 building proposed for demolition.
 The small garage is of marginal value, and is not contemporary with the
 house. Its replacement does not warrant providing a substantial community
 wide benefit, without demonstration that it is of high architectural merit. A
 new structure will outweigh any historic or architectural significance of the
 1953 garage.
 And all of the following:
 D. The demolition and redevelopment proposal mitigates to the greatest extent
 practical any impact to the historical importance of other structures located
 on the property and adjacent properties;
 The nature of this small, accessory structure; detached from the 1929
 residence is not fully developed in the Historic Sites and Structures Survey
 narrative. Its historic importance, if any, is limited.
 E. All historically and architecturally important design, features, construction
 techniques, examples of craftsmanship and materials have been properly
 documented using the applicable standards of the Historic American Building
 Survey (HABS) and made available to historians, architectural historians and
 others interested in Burlington’s architectural history;
 For this minor accessory structure of undefined architectural importance,
 photographs are sufficient for documenting its appearance and materials.
 and,
 F. The applicant has agreed to redevelop the site after demolition pursuant to an
 approved redevelopment plan which provides for a replacement structure(s).
 Redevelopment at this site is the focus of this permit application.
 (i) Such a plan shall be compatible with the historical integrity and enhances
 the architectural character of the immediate area, neighborhood, and
 district;
 While larger than the structure proposed for demolition, the new garage
 will be differentiated from the residential structure, yet articulated in a
 more contemporary vocabulary to clearly demarcate the difference
 between old and new.
 (ii) Such plans must include an acceptable timetable and guarantees which
 may include performance bonds/letters of credit for demolition and
 completion of the project;
 With DRB approval, the zoning permit will have a three-year lifetime.
 and,
 (iii) The time between demolition and commencement of new construction
 generally shall not exceed six (6) months.


Memorandum to the Development Review Board 8

 Page 10 of 85
 This shall be a condition of approval.
 This requirement may be waived if the applicant agrees to deed restrict the
 property to provide for open space or recreational uses where such a
 restriction constitutes a greater benefit to the community than the property’s
 redevelopment.
 Affirmative finding as conditioned.

3. Deconstruction: Salvage and Reuse of Historic Building Materials.
 The applicant shall be encouraged to sell or reclaim a structure and all historic
 building materials, or permit others to salvage them and to provide an
 opportunity for others to purchase or reclaim the building or its materials for
 future use. An applicant may be required to advertise the availability of the
 structure and materials for sale or salvage in a local newspaper on at least three
 (3) occasions prior to demolition.
 The applicant may consider safe salvage and reuse of the structure; however, it is likely that
 the age of the building may include a presumption of the presence of lead paint.
 The limited architectural value of the structure coupled with material concerns and public
 safety may preclude its reuse.

Article 6: Development Review Standards
Part 2: Site Plan Design Standards
Sec. 6.2.1 Applicability.
 These standards shall be satisfied for the approval of all development subject to the
 provisions of this ordinance found in Article 3, Section 3.4.2(1) – Site Plan Review.
Sec. 6.2.2 Review Standards
(a) Protection of Important Natural Features:
 None identified. Afffirmative finding.

(b) Topographical Alterations:
 None proposed. Affirmative finding.

(c) Protection of Important Public Views:
 Not applicable.

(d) Protection of Important Cultural Resources:
 Burlington’s architectural and cultural heritage shall be protected through sensitive and
 respectful redevelopment, rehabilitation, and infill. Archeological sites likely to yield
 information important to the city’s or the region’s pre-history or history shall be
 evaluated, documented, and avoided whenever feasible. Where the proposed development
 involves sites listed or eligible for listing on a state or national register of historic places,
 the applicant shall meet the applicable development and design standards pursuant to
 Sec. 5.4.8(b).



Memorandum to the Development Review Board 9

 Page 11 of 85
 See Section 5.4.8, above.

(e) Supporting the Use of Renewable Energy Resources:
 Where feasible, the site plan should be so designed as to take advantage of the site’s
 inherent potential to utilize sources of renewable energy including direct sunlight, wind,
 or running water. The site plan should also incorporate site planning and landscaping
 decisions intended to minimize energy demand such as siting buildings to maximize solar
 access or the use of deciduous and coniferous trees to create shade and windbreak.
 Buildings should, where appropriate within the context of the neighborhood development
 pattern, maximize their solar exposure by being oriented to maximize natural light and
 heat gain during winter months, and to minimize casting shadows into ground floor
 living space of a building on an adjacent property.
 No part of this application precludes the use of wind, water, solar, geothermal or other
 renewable energy resources. Affirmative finding.

(f) Brownfield Sites:
 Where a proposed development involves a known or suspected brownfield, the site plan
 shall indicate areas of known or suspected contamination, and the applicant shall
 identify completed or planned remediation necessary to support the intended use(s).
 Not applicable.

(g) Provide for nature's events:
 Special attention shall be accorded to stormwater runoff so that neighboring properties
 and/or the public stormwater drainage system are not adversely affected. All
 development and site disturbance shall follow applicable city and state erosion and
 stormwater management guidelines in accordance with the requirements of Art 5, Sec
 5.5.3.
 As construction of the proposed garage will disturb more than 400 sq. ft., an Erosion
 Prevention and Sediment Control Plan will be required for submission, for review and
 approval by the City Stormwater Engineer.
 Design features which address the effects of rain, snow, and ice at building entrances,
 and to provisions for snow and ice removal or storage from circulation areas shall also
 be incorporated.
 A diverter strip is proposed on the roof above the westerly pedestrian door. See Plans
 A100 and A200. Affirmative finding.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 10

 Page 12 of 85
(h) Building Location and Orientation:
 The introduction of new buildings and additions shall be consistent with the intent of the
 district. New buildings and additions should be aligned with the front façade of
 neighboring buildings to reinforce the existing “street-edge,” or where necessary,
 located in such a way that complements existing natural features and landscapes.
 Buildings placed in mixed-use areas where high volumes of pedestrian traffic are desired
 should seek to provide sufficient space (optimally 12-15 feet) between the curbline and
 the building face to facilitate the flow of pedestrian traffic. In such areas, architectural
 recesses and articulations at the street-level are particularly important, and can be used
 as an alternative to a complete building setback in order to maintain the existing street
 wall.
 In residential areas, accessory buildings shall be located in such a way so as to be
 secondary and subordinate in scale and design to the principal structure. A parking
 structure – either attached or detached – shall be setback from the longest street-facing
 wall of the principal structure and be deferential yet consistent in character and design.
 Where a garage is attached to a principal single-family or duplex residential structure
 and oriented to the street (i.e. the garage doors face the street) the following standards
 shall apply:
 1. Except as provided in subsections 3, 4 and 5 below, a street-facing garage wall
 shall constitute no more than 50% of the width of the street-facing façade of the
 entire structure (including the garage portion), and shall not exceed 24-feet. In
 cases where a street-facing garage wall constitutes between 30%-50% of the
 street-facing façade, living space is encouraged above to integrate the garage
 more closely into the design and mass of the overall structure. In cases where the
 street-facing garage wall constitutes more than 50% of the width of the street-
 facing façade, living space above is required.
 The proposed replacement garage does not exceed 50% of the width of the street
 facing façade. The garage itself is less than 24’ in width. Affirmative finding.
 2. Each bay of the garage shall have a separate entrance door of no more than 10-
 feet in width.


Memorandum to the Development Review Board 11

 Page 13 of 85
 The application shall be revised to limit garage doors or no more than 10’ in width.
 Affirmative finding as conditioned.
 3. Where the width of the street-facing façade of the residential portion of the
 structure is less than 14 feet, the street-facing garage portion may be allowed up
 to but not exceeding 14 feet in order to allow for a single garage bay.
 Not applicable.
 4. Where a garage entrance is within a single roofline and wholly integrated into the
 overall design the front façade of the structure, it may constitute more than 50%
 of the width of the street-facing façade provided there is interior living space
 above, and the primary pedestrian entrance offers a clear and welcoming
 entrance from the street.
 The garage entrance is not within a single roofline and wholly integrated into the
 overally design of the structural façade. Not applicable.
 5. Enclosed space originally designed and constructed as a garage for vehicular
 parking but converted to living space may be converted back to enclosed
 vehicular parking provided there is no expansion of the building footprint
 necessary to complete the conversion.
 Not applicable.

(i)Vehicular Access:
 Curb cuts shall be arranged and limited in number to reduce congestion and improve
 traffic safety. A secondary access point from side roads is encouraged where possible to
 improve traffic flow and safety along major streets. The width and radius of curb cuts
 should be kept to the minimum width necessary, and sight triangles and sufficient
 turnarounds for vehicles shall be provided to reduce the potential for accidents at points
 of egress.
 Whether commercial or residential, shared driveways are encouraged, where possible
 and appropriate.
 The curb cut is preexisting. Affirmative
 finding.

(j) Pedestrian Access:
 Pedestrians shall be provided one or more
 direct and unobstructed paths between a public
 sidewalk and the primary building entrance.
 Well defined pedestrian routes shall be
 provided through parking areas to primary
 building access points and be designed to
 provide a physical separation between vehicles
 and pedestrians in a manner that minimizes
 conflicts and improves safety. Where sidewalks



Memorandum to the Development Review Board 12

 Page 14 of 85
 and driveways meet, the sidewalk shall be clearly marked by differentiated ground
 materials and/or pavement markings.
 There is a pre-existing brick walkway that leads to the front porch. Affirmative finding.

(k) Accessibility for the Handicapped:
 Special attention shall be given to the location and integration of accessible routes,
 parking spaces, and ramps for the disabled. Special attention shall also be given to
 identifying accessible access points between buildings and parking areas, public streets
 and sidewalks. The federal Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines
 (ADAAG) shall be used as a guide in determining the adequacy of the proposed
 development in addressing the needs of the disabled.
 While encouraged, accessibility is not a requirement for single family homes. ADA
 access compliance is under the jurisdiction of the building official. Affirmative finding.

(l) Parking and Circulation:
 As a replacement garage to a single-family home, its function and orientation remain as
 existing conditions. Affirmative finding.

(m) Landscaping, Fences and Retaining Walls:
 Part of the garage foundation includes a structural retaining wall to support the existing
 front porch. Reference is made to plans S100. Affirmative finding.

(n) Public Plazas and Open Space:
 Not applicable.

(o) Outdoor Lighting:
 Where exterior lighting is proposed
 the applicant shall meet the
 lighting performance standards as
 per Sec 5.5.2.
 Elevations suggest the installation
 of sconce lighting at the garage
 entrance. Fixture and illumination
 information is required.
 Affirmative finding as
 conditioned.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 13

 Page 15 of 85
(p) Integrate infrastructure into the design:
 Exterior storage areas, machinery and equipment installations, service and loading
 areas, utility meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall
 utilize setbacks, plantings, enclosures and other mitigation or screening methods to
 minimize their auditory and visual impact on the public street and neighboring properties
 to the extent practicable.
 Any development involving the installation of machinery or equipment which emits heat,
 vapor, fumes, vibration, or noise shall minimize, insofar as practicable, any adverse
 impact on neighboring properties and the environment pursuant to the requirements of
 Article 5, Part 5 Performance Standards.
The plan does not include any identified machinery, equipment, meters, mailboxes or similar
accessory structure. Not applicable.
Part 3: Architectural Design Standards
Sec. 6.3.1 Applicability.
 These standards are enacted and shall be satisfied for the approval of all development
 subject to the provisions of this ordinance found in Article 3, Section 3.4.2(b) – Design
 Review.
Sec. 6.3.2 Review Standards
(a) Relate development to its environment:
 Proposed buildings and additions shall be appropriately scaled and proportioned for
 their function and with respect to the purpose of the zoning district. They should integrate
 harmoniously into the topography, and to the use, scale, and architectural details of
 existing buildings in the vicinity; however, such consideration shall not require building
 height to be more limited than otherwise allowed within an applicable zoning district or
 overlay zone per Article 4.
 The following shall be considered:

1. Massing, Height and Scale:
 The massing and height of the proposed garage are minor and deferential to the
 existing principal structure. Affirmative finding.

2. Roofs and Rooflines.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 14

 Page 16 of 85
 The new roof will be slightly pitched to the rear/south. Affirmative finding.




3. Building Openings
 Other than the overhead garage door, there will be a pedestrian door on the west/side
 of the structure. Affirmative finding.

(b) Protection of Important Architectural Resources:
 See Section 5.4.8.

(c) Protection of Important Public Views:
 Not applicable.

(d) Provide an active and inviting street edge:
 The erection of an attached parking structure will
 physically strengthen the street wall, yet provide a
 pleasant, differentiated structural vocabulary to the
 arrangement. Clearly more contemporary than the
 Craftsman style home, the natural materials and
 toned palette allow the buildings to naturally
 interelate. Affirmative finding.

 (e) Quality of materials:
 All development shall maximize the use of highly durable building materials that extend
 the life cycle of the building, and reduce maintenance, waste, and environmental impacts.
 Such materials are particularly important in certain highly trafficked locations such as
 along major streets, sidewalks, loading areas, and driveways. Efforts to incorporate the
 use of recycled content materials and building materials and products that are extracted
 and/or manufactured within the region are highly encouraged.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 15

 Page 17 of 85
 Owners of historic structures are encouraged to consult with an architectural historian in
 order to determine the most appropriate repair, restoration or replacement of historic
 building materials as outlined by the requirements of Art 5, Sec. 5.4.8.
 The vertical wood sheathing on the north-front will present an appealing counterpoint to
 the existing stucco residence. The sides of the garage are proposed to be painted MDO
 with trim boards. Affirmative finding.

(f) Reduce energy utilization:
 New structures should incorporate the best available technologies and materials in order
 to maximize energy efficient design. All new construction shall meet the Guidelines for
 Energy Efficient Construction pursuant to the requirements of Article VI. Energy
 Conservation, Section 8 of the City of Burlington Code of Ordinances.
 New structures should take advantage of solar access where available, and shall
 undertake efforts to reduce the impacts of shadows cast on adjacent buildings where
 practicable, in order to provide opportunities for the use of active and passive solar
 utilization.
 Affirmative finding as conditioned.

(g) Make advertising features complementary to the site:
 Not applicable.

(h) Integrate infrastructure into the building design:
 See Section 6.2.2 (p), above.

(i) Make spaces secure and safe:
 Spaces shall be designed to facilitate building evacuation, accessibility by fire, police or
 other emergency personnel and equipment, and, to the extent feasible, provide for
 adequate and secure visibility for persons using and observing such spaces. Building
 entrances/entry points shall be visible and adequately lit, and intercom systems for multi-
 family housing should be incorporated where possible, to maximize personal safety.
 Construction shall adhere to all applicable building and life safety codes as defined by the
 building official. Affirmative finding as conditioned.

Article 8: Parking
Zoning Amendment ZA-22-07 eliminated minimum parking requirements. The proposal does
not exceed Maximum Parking allowances of Section 8.1.9-1. (Single Family detached and
Duplex: 3 parking spaces maximum. Driveway parking is excluded from Maximum Parking
calculation.) Affirmative finding.

Conditions of Approval:
 1. The application shall be revised to limit garage doors or no more than 10’ in
 width.



Memorandum to the Development Review Board 16

 Page 18 of 85
 2. Prior to release of the zoning permit, an Erosion Prevention and Sediment
 Control Plan shall be provided to the Stormwater Engineer for review and
 approval.
 3. The driveway shall not exceed 18’ in width.
 4. Hours of construction are limited to M-F 7:30 am to 5:30 pm. Saturday
 construction is limited to interior work. There shall be no construction
 activities on Sundays.
 5. All new construction shall meet the Guidelines for Energy Efficient
 Construction pursuant to the requirements of Article VI. Energy Conservation,
 Section 8 of the City of Burlington Code of Ordinances.
 6. All construction materials shall be disposed of in a safe and legal manner. The
 applicant shall abide by best practices in material abatement and disposal as
 required by law.
 7. The time between demolition and commencement of new construction generally shall not
 exceed six (6) months.
 8. Any future alteration will be reviewed under the standards in effect at the time
 of application.
 9. Standard Permit Conditions 1-15.

NOTE: These are staff comments only. The Development Review Board, who
may approve, table, modify, or deny projects, makes decisions.




Memorandum to the Development Review Board 17

 Page 19 of 85
OWNER
ALEX & ELIZABETH HALPERN
49 HENDERSON TERRACE
BURLINGTON, VT 05401




 A
 49 HENDERSON TERRACE


 IL
ARCHITECT
ALEX HALPERN
49 HENDERSON TERRACE
 REPLACEMENT GARAGE - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
BURLINGTON, VT 05401
 iSSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION




 SUMMARY
 REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE AND REPLACE WITH NEW GARAGE.


 DRAWINGS
 AS100 - SITE PLAN - EXISTING AND PROPOSED WITH ZONING SUMMARY AND CALCULATIONS
 AE100 - EXISTING GARAGE FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
 AE200 - EXISTING GARAGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
 AA100 - NEW GARAGE FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS
 AA200 - NEW GARGE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS




 49 HENDERSON
 TERRACE
 BURLINGTON, VT




 GROUND
 CONTACT RATED




 2/14/2026 - ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION




 Page 20 of 85
 A
 IL
 PHOTO



 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401
 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com
 Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors




 5'-0" 7'-5" AE 200
 AE 200


 PHOTO
 14'-9" 14'-10"
 3 3
 100 sf

 22'-0"
 6'X19' 6'X19'
 CAR
 176 sf 19'-0" 176 sf
 CAR
 430 sf
 PROPOSED
 ASPHALT DRIVEWAY
 (TO REPLACE
 EXISTING)
 12'-3"
 5'-1" 5'-6"
 19'-8"

 CRAWL SPACE HALF-BASEMENT DN 28'-0"
 KITCHEN 17'-1" FAMILY ROOM
 PROPOSED 30'-6"
 NEW GARAGE 445 sf
 (TO REPLACE EXISTING
 EXISTING
 28'-0"
 GARAGE)


 28'-0" 550 sf EXISTING FRONT VIEW

 1,298 sf 18'-11"
 DROPPED BEAM 1,298 sf


 ROOF ABOVE
 5'-11"
 19'-0"
 DINETTE DINING ROOM
 143 sf 143 sf
 ROOF ABOVE


 280 sf 280 sf

 SHED PHOTOCLOSET Project Name!
 AE 200 2 4 AE 200 AE 200 2 DN SHED ROOF 4 AE 200



 BASEMENT
 EXISTING BACK VIEW

 191 sf 191 sf




 LIVING ROOM

 ENTRY
 UP
 GARAGE
 GARAGE ROOF




 UP
 CITY, STATE
 COVERED PORCH
 CRAWL SPACE
 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 HAL49HT
 Proj #
 ORIGINATION DATE: SCALE:

 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"
 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
 1 1
 Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH
 ISSUE LOG:
 AE 200 AE 200
 Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026




 PROPOSED NEW LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION ZONING ORDINANCE REFERENCES ZONING REVIEW SUMMARY LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION
 PROPOSDED ZONING REVIEW SUMMARY LOT: 74'X120'= 8,880 SF - NO CHANGE
 Existing Lot Coverage: 2,442 SF DISTRICT: RESIDENTIAL LOW INTENSITY LOT: 74'X120'= 8,880 SF
 EXISTING SIDE VIEW
 DISTRICT: RL RESIDENTIAL LOW INTENSITY LOT COVERAGE: DIMENSIONAL REQUIRMENTS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE: LOT COVERAGE:
 DIMENSIONAL REQUIRMENTS: - MIN. FRONTAGE: 30' - HOUSE+PORCH+STAIR+BULKHEAD= 1,298 SF
 - HOUSE+PORCH+STAIR+BULKHEAD= 1,298 SF - NO CHANGE
 - MIN. FRONTAGE: NO CHANGE - FRONT YARD SETBACK:AVG.2ADJ+/-5';MAX.REQ:25' - FRONT WALK+FRONT PATIO= 176 SF SHEET CONTENTS:
 - FRONT WALK+FRONT PATIO= 176 SF - NO CHANGE - SIDE SETBACK 10% OR AVG.2 BOTH SIDES; MAX.20'
 - FRONT YARD SETBACK: INCREASED AT GARAGE FROM 14'-10" TO 22'-0" - REAR SIDE PATIO= 143 SF - NO CHANGE - REAR SIDE PATIO= 143 SF
 - SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5'-0" MINIMUM - REAR SETBACK: 20'
 - BACK DECK= 280 SF - NO CHANGE - BACK DECK= 280 SF
 - REAR SETBACK: NO CHANGE - MAX ALLOWABLE COVERAGE: 45%
 - GARAGE= 560 SF - INCREASE OF 115 SF - MAX HEIGHT= 35' 3 STORIES - GARAGE= 445 SF
 - LOT COVERAGE INCREASE OF +5.1% TO 32.5% (<45% MAX)
 - MAX HEIGHT: NO CHANGE. GARAGE HEIGHT IS LESS THAN 15'-0" - DRIVEWAY= 430 SF - INCREASE OF 330 SF
 INCREASED LOT COVERAGE FROM EXISTING CONDITION= +445 SF (+ 5.1%)
 REQUIRED SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR PRINCIPAL IS 7'-5"
 SIDEYARD SETBACK: GARAGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MIN. 5'-0"
 - DRIVEWAY= 100 SF
 TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE= 2,442 SF OR 27.5% EXISTING PLANS
 SITE PLAN


1/10/2025 5:44:01 PM
 TOTAL PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE= 2,887 SF OR 32.5% (PER 5.2.5(b)5 EXCEPTIONS TO YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS) - ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE= 45% OF 8,880 SF= 3,996 SF
 - ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE= 45% OF 8,880 SF= 3,996 SF - 45%-27.5%=17.5% REMAINING AVAILABLE
 - 45%-32.5%=12.5% REMAINING AVAILABLE - 3,996 SF - 2,442 SF= 1,554 SF REMAINING AVAILABLE
 - 3,996 SF - 2,877 SF= 1,109 SF REMAINING AVAILABLE SHEET NO:




 2
 AS100
 AE100
 PROPOSED
 EXISTING SITE PLAN - FOR NEW GARAGE AND ENLARGED DRIVEWAY.
 BASEMENT
 SEE = 1'-0"
 SCALE: 1/4" REF.: A201
 GRAPHIC SCALE
 1
 AS100
 AE100
 EXISTING SITE PLAN
 EXISTING LEVEL
 SCALE: 1/4"
 1
 SEE= 1'-0" REF.: A201
 GRAPHIC SCALE
 AS100
 AE100
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 21 of 85
 A
 IL
 N
 N
 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401
 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com
 Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors




 AE 200
 AE 200 AE 200


 3
 3 3




 CRAWL SPACE HALF-BASEMENT DN
 KITCHEN FAMILY ROOM


 REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE
 AND REPLACE WITH NEWLY DROPPED BEAM AND REPLACE WITH NEWLY
 PROPOSED GARAGE ON A100 PROPOSED GARAGE ON A100
 SHED ROOF
 ROOF ABOVE

 DINETTE DINING ROOM

 ROOF ABOVE


 SLOPE
 LINE OF

 SLOPE
 WALL
 BELOW

 SHED AE 200 2 CLOSET 4 AE 200
 Project Name!
 AE 200 2 EXISTING BASEMENT 430 sf 4 AE 200 AE 200 2 DN SHED ROOF 4 AE 200

 EXISTING
 BASEMENT 5'-6"
 GARAGE
 22'-3" ROOF PLAN
 SLOPE
 ROOF GARAGE ROOF
 OVERHANG


 30'-0"
 LIVING ROOM SKYLIGHT

 EXISTING CRICKET
 ENTRY
 GARAGE
 GARAGE
 UP SLOPE SLOPE


 430 SF
 GARAGE ROOF

 SKYLIGHT



 LOT LINE
 UP
 CITY, STATE
 COVERED PORCH
 CRAWL SPACE 5'-11"
 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 HAL49HT
 Proj #
 ORIGINATION DATE: SCALE:
 17'-1"
 19'-0" 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"
 1 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:
 1 1
 Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH
 AE 200
 ISSUE LOG:
 AE 200 AE 200
 Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026
 EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY


 SHEET CONTENTS:




 EXISTING PLANS


1/10/2025 5:44:01 PM
 SHEET NO:




 2
 AE100
 EXISTING BASEMENT/ GARAGE FLOOR LEVEL
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: A201
 1
 AE100
 EXISTING ROOF 1PLAN
 EXISTING LEVEL
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: A201
 AE100
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 22 of 85
 A
 IL
 EXISTING MASONRY CHIMNEY



 PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD AND
 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF SOFFIT
 PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401
 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com
 ROOF ROOF Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"

 CRICKET

 12
 SKYLIGHT 6.75 SKYLIGHT
 SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT 12
 6.75
 METAL STEP FLASHING

 13'-0" 13'-0"



 REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE
 AND REPLACE WITH NEWLY 12 12
 EXISTING WOOD PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD
 WINDOW PROPOSED GARAGE ON A100 6.75 6.75
 AND SOFFIT EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 LEVEL 2 TYP. LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 PAINTED WOOD COLUMN


 EXISTING STUCCO SIDING
 EXISTING
 EXISTINGGARAGE AND
 PAINTED WOOD GARAGE DOOR 9'-0" NOT USED 9'-0"
 COLUMN

 VERTICAL
 CEDAR BOARDS




 APPROXIMATELY
 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 LEVEL 1 TYP. LEVEL 1

 10'-3"
 0" 0"

 EXISTING STUCCO FINISH EXISTING CORRUGATED FIBRERGLAS
 STUCCO HOUSE FIBRERGLAS O.H. DOOR

 7'-6" 7'-6"




 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT


 1'-9 3/16" 1'-9 3/16"
 GARAGE FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-6" -7'-6"
 -7'-10" -7'-10"
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING
 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"




 1 EXISTING  NORTH
 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION
 ELEVATION 2 EXISTING  EAST
 EXISTING LEFT  ELEVATION / GARAGE ON OTHER SIDE OF HOUSE
 ELEVATION
 AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:




 Project Name!
 EXISTING MASONRY
 CHIMNEY
 ROOF PAINTED WOOD RAKE BD AND SOFFIT ROOF
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"
 PLUMBING STACK CRICKET PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE BD
 THREE TAB ASPHALT VENT 12 12
 SHINGLE` 6.75 6.75 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLES
 METAL STEP FLASHING

 SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT

 13'-0" 13'-0"


 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS


 STUCCO FINISH

 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING STUCCO SIDING
 REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE AND REPLACE WITH NEWLY
 AND REPLACE WITH NEWLY PROPOSED GARAGE ON A100
 EXISTING WOOD
 PROPOSED GARAGE ON A100 CITY, STATE
 9'-0"
 WINDOWS
 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS 9'-0"


 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 CORRUGATED HAL49HT
 ALUMINUM
 SIDING
 ALUMINUM EXISTING GARAGE Proj #
 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 ORIGINATIONDATE:
 ORIGINATION SCALE:
 DATE:
 0" 0"
 STEEL ROOFING
 STUCCO FINISH 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"
 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:


 CORRUGATED
 CORRUGATED
 Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH
 ALUMINUM
 7'-6" 7'-6"
 FIBRERGLAS
 SIDING FIBRERGLAS ISSUE LOG:

 Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026

 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT
 GARAGE FLOOR

 1'-9 3/16"
 -7'-6" GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-10" -7'-6"
 -7'-10"
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING
 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"


 SHEET CONTENTS:



 EXISTING
 EXTERIOR


1/10/2025 5:41:46 PM
 ELEVATIONS
 SHEET NO:




 3
 AE200
 EXISTING  SOUTH
 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION
 ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 4
 AE200
 EXISTING  WESTELEVATION
 EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 AE200
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 23 of 85
 A
 IL
 N
 N
 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401
3-0/6-8 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com
 Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors




 AE 200
 AE 200 AE 200


 3
 3 3




 CRAWL SPACE HALF-BASEMENT DN
 MAINTAIN MINIMUM 5'-0" SIDE YARD SETBACK
 KITCHEN FAMILY ROOM
 V.I.F.
 19'-8"
 19'-8" 5'-4"
 (10% LOT WIDTH)




 DROPPED BEAM


 8'-0"
 SHED ROOF
 LEVEL FLOOR THIS AREA ROOF ABOVE
 5'-3"
 (MATCHES
 EXISTING) DINETTE DINING ROOM




 V.I.F. V.I.F.
 ROOF ABOVE
 EXISTING
 SLOPE
 LINE OF
 ROOF
 SLOPE
 6 LIGHT FIXTURES EQUALLY WALL
 SPACED ABOVE
 BELOW
 PLAN
 SHED AE 200 2 CLOSET 4 AE 200
 Project Name!
 EXISTING BASEMENT 430 sf AE 200 AE 200 DN SHED ROOF AE 200
 28'-4" 28'-4"
 AE 200 2 4 2 4
 SECTION SLOPE DOWN: 0.25"/1.0'
 18"x18"x18" pit




 (ALIGN ENDWALLS WITH OUTSIDE FACE OF EXISTING BASEMENT WALLS) (ALIGN ENDWALLS WITH OUTSIDE FACE OF EXISTING BASEMENT WALLS)
 (no drain & no outlet) EPDM MEMBRANE ROOF
 BASEMENT
 Galv. Steel Grate or Sim.
 6'x16'
 https://thetrenchgratestore.com/product/pi

 SLOPE
 t-sump-grates-with-frames-18-x-18-x-1-25 ROOF GARAGE ROOF
 / SLOPE DOWN 2%: SLOPE DOWN 2%: OVERHANG


 LOT LINE
 LIVING ROOM

 SLOPE DOWN 2%:
 POWER AS REQUIED BY CODE SKYLIGHT
 POWER FOR OH DOOR OPERATOR
 POWER FOR LIGHTS
 DIVERTER STRIP
 SWITCHED AT EACH CRICKET ABOVE DOOR
 PERSON-DOOR GARAGE 3-0/6-8
 560 GSF ENTRY
 UP SLOPE
 GARAGE 5'-1"
 CENTER DOOR ON CLEAR INTERIOR WIDTH
 16'-0"
 1'-2" GARAGE
 SLOPE DN ROOF

 SKYLIGHT

 0'-10"
 SUPPORT EXISTING UP
 PORCH ON NEW
 RETAINING WALL CITY, STATE
 COVERED PORCH
 CRAWL SPACE 12'-0"




 LOW RETAINING WALL EXTENSION
 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 HAL49HT
 Proj #
 ORIGINATION DATE: SCALE:


 6'X19' 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"




 ASPHALT DRIVWAY
 1

 23'-10"
 CAR 1
 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:




 SLOPE UP: 2%
 1
 VIF Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH
 AE 200
 ISSUE LOG:
 AE 200 AE 200
 Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026



 ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 460 SF
 EXPANDED
 ASPHALT
 DRIVEWAY
 EXISTING STONE WALL

 SHEET CONTENTS:




 19'-0" EXISTING PLANS
 PROPOSED  PLANS



 1/10/2025 5:44:01 PM
 VIF


 SHEET NO:




 2
 AE100
 PROPOSED
 EXISTING FLOOR PLAN
 BASEMENT
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: A201
 EXISTING CURB CUT
 REMAINS IN PLACE.
 NEW ASPHALT
 1
 AE100
 PROPOSED
 EXISTING ROOF
 ROOF
 EXISTING LEVEL PLAN
 1PLAN
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: A201
 A100
 AE100
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 24 of 85
 SLOPE DOWN: 0.25"/1.0'
 OUT-TO-IN
 EXISTING WINDOW SILL
 EPDM ROOF MEMBRANE
 TERMINATION BAR W SEALANT
 COVER BOARD
 2" HIGH PSI RIGID INSULATION BOARD
 3/4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING
 LEDGER
 FRAMING

 SLOPE DOWN: 0.25"/1.0'
 EPDM ROOFING W METAL DRIP
 COVER BOARD
 HIGH PSI RIGID INSULATION BOARD
 3/4" SHEATHING
 FRAMING
 BLOCKING
 2X EAVE EXTENSION W TRIM BOARDS
 A
 IL
 EXISTING MASONRY CHIMNEY


 10'-8" V.I.F.
 8'-1/2"
 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF T.O. FOUNDATION WALL BEYOND
 9'-0" PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD AND METAL DIRP
 SOFFIT TRIM OVER 2X EAVE EXTENSION
 OVER 2X BLOCKING 16"OC
 19'-8" PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401
 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com


 0'-7 1/2"
 ROOF ROOF Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"
 T.O. SLAB TO BE AT OR BELOW EXISIT. BASEMENT FLOOR
 CRICKET
 GARAGE SECTION
 NO DRAIN 12 SIDING
 SKYLIGHT 6.75 SKYLIGHT VENTILATED STRAPPING
 12 BUILDING WRAP
 SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT 2" RIGID INSULATION, TAPED
 6.75 3/4" SHEATHING
 METAL STEP FLASHING
 FRAMING

 13'-0" 13'-0"




 EXISTING WOOD 12 12
 6.75 6.75 PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD
 WINDOW AND SOFFIT EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 LEVEL 2 TYP. LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 PAINTED WOOD COLUMN


 EXISTING STUCCO SIDING
 EXISTING GARAGE AND
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 CANTILEVERED
 PAINTED WOOD GARAGE DOOR WALL EXTENSION & PLAN DETAIL
 COLUMN BLOCKING VERTICAL MDO JOINTS HORIZONTAL DRIP
 BACKED UP WITH BLACK SUPPORTED ON VENTED
 ALUMINUM SHEET METAL STRAPPING
 METAL CAP FLASHING
 AND VENTED STRAPPING.
 SLOPED ROOF BEYOND
 EDGE SEAL ALL MDO
 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING
 LEVEL 1 TYP. LEVEL 1
 0" 0"
 MDO BASE.
 EDGE SEAL ALL MDO
 EXISTING STUCCO FINISH DOWN-




 10'-9 1/2"
 LIGHT
 https://sno
 EXISTING O.H. DOOR c.com/en-


 V.I.F.
 us/product
 STUCCO HOUSE
 7'-6" 7'-6"
 s/evolutio
 BOD OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY
 V.I.F.
 n-1829?v
 MODEL 7800 IMPRESSION COLLECTION ariant=44 CONCRETE SLAB
 8'-0"
 25096059
 3058 AVB (STEGO)
 INSULATED FIBERGLASS COLLECTION OR
 FULLY TAPED
 SIMILAR ALUMINUM INSULATION COVER
 SERIES 984 HORIZONTAL V-GROOVE 2" RIGID INSULATION BOARD EXTEND 2" BELOW GRADE
 CHERRY STAIN FINISH PERIMETER BENTINITE
 PERIMITER SEALANT
 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT


 1'-9 3/16" 1'-9 3/16"
 GARAGE FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-6" -7'-6"
 -7'-10" -7'-10"
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING
 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"
 METAL CAP FLASHING


 SLOPED ROOF BEYOND




 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING
 EXTEND INSULATION TO T.O. FOOTING


 DOWN-
 LIGHT
 https://sno
 c.com/en-
 O.H. DOOR us/product
 s/evolutio
 BOD OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY
 V.I.F.
 n-1829?v
 ariant=44
 MODEL 7800 IMPRESSION COLLECTION
 8'-0"
 25096059
 3058
 INSULATED FIBERGLASS COLLECTION OR
 SIMILAR
 SERIES 984 HORIZONTAL V-GROOVE
 CHERRY STAIN FINISH
 NE




 CONCEPT COLOR SCHEME



 1 PROPOSED
 EXISTING NORTH
 FRONT ELEVATION
 ELEVATION 2 CROSS-SECTION AND DETAILS
 EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION
 AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:



 EXISTING GARAGE


 PAINTED TRIM BOARDS ABOVE




 FROST WALL WITHIN




 PAINTED MDO PANEL SIDING & BASE

 Project Name!
 EXISTING MASONRY
 CHIMNEY CONCEPT COLOR SCHEME

 ROOF PAINTED WOOD RAKE BD AND SOFFIT ROOF
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"
 PLUMBING STACK CRICKET PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE BD
 THREE TAB ASPHALT VENT 12 12
 SHINGLE` 6.75 6.75 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLES
 METAL STEP FLASHING

 SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT

 13'-0" 13'-0"


 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS


 STUCCO FINISH

 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 EXISTING STUCCO SIDING


 EXISTING WOOD
 CITY, STATE
 9'-0"
 WINDOWS
 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS 9'-0"


 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 HAL49HT
 0.25"/1.0' EXISTING GARAGE Proj #
 PAINTED TRIM BOARDS ABOVE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 ORIGINATIONDATE:
 ORIGINATION SCALE:
ALIGN DATE:
 0" PAINTED TRIM BOARDS ABOVE 0"
 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"

 7'-2 1/2"
 STUCCO FINISH
 V.I.F.
 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:




 11'-1 1/2"
 PAINTED MDO PANEL SIDING
 Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH

 7'-6" 10'-10"
 V.I.F.
 7'-6"
 ISSUE LOG:

 FROST WALL WITHIN Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026


 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT PAINTED MDO PANEL SIDING & BASE NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT
 GARAGE FLOOR

 1'-9 3/16"
 -7'-6" GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-10" -7'-6"
 -7'-10"
 2% SLOPE UP TO GARAGE FLOOR
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING
 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"


 SHEET CONTENTS:



 EXISTING
 EXTERIOR


 1/10/2025 5:41:46 PM
 ELEVATIONS
 SHEET NO:




 3
 AE200
 PROPOSED SOUTH
 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION
 ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 4
 AE200
 PROPOSED WEST
 EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
 ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 A200
 AE200
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 25 of 85
 17'-7" 7'-5"
 (10% LOT WIDTH)
 A
 IL
 EXISTING MASONRY CHIMNEY



 1'-6" SHED ROOF PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD AND
 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF SOFFIT
 5'-11"

 10'-8"
 (MATCHES
 PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE
 V.I.F.
 EXISTING)
 81 Maple Street ▪ Burlington VT 05401

 9'-0"
 802▪864▪6844 ▪ www.fffinc.com
 ROOF ROOF Architecture ▪ Planning ▪ Interiors
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"

 EXISTING CRICKET

 ROOF 12
 SLOPE SKYLIGHT 6.75 SKYLIGHT
 SHED SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT PLAN 12
 EMENT 430 sf AE 200 6.75
 28'-3"
 4 4 AE METAL STEP FLASHING
 SHED ROOF
 13'-0" 13'-0"
 4
 6'x14' SKYLIGHT
 SLOPE DOWN: 0.25"/1.0' 12
 NT 6.75
 6'x16' 22'-3"
 SECTION
 EXISTING WOOD GARAGE ROOF 12 12
 PAINTED WOOD RAKE BOARD

 LOT LINE
 WINDOW 6.75 6.75 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 AND SOFFIT
 LEVEL 2 TYP. LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 PAINTED WOOD COLUMN

 DIVERTER STRIP
 3-0/6-8 OVER DOOR
 EXISTING STUCCO SIDING
 EXISTING GARAGE AND
 GARAGE 5'-9"PAINTED WOOD
 (MATCHES GARAGE DOOR 9'-0" SLOPE 9'-0"
 CENTER DOOR ON CLEAR INTERIOR COLUMN
 EXISTING)

 16'-0"
 1'-2"
 WIDTH

 GARAGE
 SLOPE DN ROOF
 19'-0" EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS
 LEVEL 1 TYP. LEVEL 1
 0'-10" 0" 0"
 SUPPORT EXISTING
 PORCH ON NEW EXISTING STUCCO FINISH
 RETAINING WALL

 ACE 7'-6" 7'-6"




 LOW RETAINING WALL WITH SLOPED TOP
 6'x14'

 19'-0"
 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT


 1'-9 3/16" 1'-9 3/16"
 GARAGE FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-6" -7'-6"
 -7'-10" -7'-10"
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING

 23'-10"
 1 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"


 E 200




 1 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION 2 EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION
 AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.: AE200 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:




 Project Name!
 EXISTING MASONRY
 CHIMNEY
 ROOF PAINTED WOOD RAKE BD AND SOFFIT ROOF
 22'-0 7/256" 22'-0 7/256"
 PLUMBING STACK CRICKET PAINTED WOOD 1X CHINE BD
 THREE TAB ASPHALT VENT 12 12
 SHINGLE` 6.75 6.75 THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLES
 METAL STEP FLASHING

 SKYLIGHT SKYLIGHT

 13'-0" 13'-0"


 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS


 STUCCO FINISH

 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2
 9'-0" 9'-0"
 EXISTING STUCCO SIDING


 EXISTING WOOD
 CITY, STATE
 9'-0"
 WINDOWS
 EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS 9'-0"


 FFF PROJECT
 PROJECT NO:
 NUMBER:
 HAL49HT
 EXISTING GARAGE Proj #
 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 ORIGINATIONDATE:
 ORIGINATION SCALE:
 DATE:
 0" 0"
 STUCCO FINISH 06/10/21
 12/21/2025 1/4" = 1'-0"
 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY:

 Author
 AAH Checker
 AAH

 7'-6" 7'-6"
 ISSUE LOG:

 Construction
 SCHEMATIC DESIGN
 2/14/2026

 NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT NEW & EXISTING BASEMENT
 GARAGE FLOOR

 1'-9 3/16"
 -7'-6" GARAGE FLOOR
 -7'-10" -7'-6"
 -7'-10"
 LOWEST T.O. FOOTING LOWEST T.O. FOOTING
 -9'-3 45/256" -9'-3 45/256"


 SHEET CONTENTS:


 STRUCTURAL
 EXISTING
 FOUNDATIONS
 EXTERIOR
 AND FRAMING



1/10/2025 5:41:46 PM
 ELEVATIONS
 SHEET NO:




 3
 AE200
 EXISTING REAR ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 4
 AE200
 EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" REF.:
 S100
 AE200
 © 2022 Freeman French Freeman Inc.




 Page 26 of 85
Page 27 of 85
Page 28 of 85
Page 29 of 85
Page 30 of 85
Page 31 of 85
Page 32 of 85
Page 33 of 85
Page 34 of 85
Department of Permitting & Inspections William Ward, Director
 Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
645 Pine Street Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner
Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Permit Technician
Telephone:(802) 865-7188 Collin Naheedy, Code Compliance Officer




 TO: Development Review Board
 FROM: Kirk Dressing
 DATE: March 25, 2026
 RE: ZP-26-42; 5 Crescent Road
 ======================================================================
 Note: These are staff comments only; decisions on projects are made by the Development
 Review Board, which may approve, deny, table or modify any project. THE APPLICANT
 OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND THE MEETING.

 Zone: RL Ward: 6

 Owner/Applicant: Jane Dunbar

 Request: Establish bakery home occupation.

 Applicable Regulations:
 Article 3 (Applications, Permits, & Project Reviews), Article 5 (Citywide General Regulations)

 Background Information:
 The applicant is requesting approval to establish a coffee roasting home occupation business. The
 property is a single detached dwelling unit and is located in a residential zone. The home
 occupation is subject to conditional use review. No site or exterior building changes are proposed.

 Previous zoning actions for this property are noted below.
  ZP-17-87 (03/09/2017) – Approval to install garden fence in front yard.
  ZP-09-393 (07/16/2009) – Approval to install new door, window, and 6’x9’ landing and
 steps in association with kitchen remodel.
  ZP-01-21 (02/01/2001) – Approval for lot line adjustment between this single family home
 parcel and the adjacent two lots at 32 glen road and 97 prospect parkway.

 Recommendation: Consent approval as per, and subject to, the following findings and
 conditions:

 I. Findings
 Article 3: Applications, Permits, and Reviews
 Part 5, Conditional Use & Major Impact Review:
 Section 3.5.6 (a) Conditional Use Review Standards
 Approval shall be granted only if the DRB, after public notice and public hearing, determines that
 the proposed conditional use and associated development shall not result in an undue adverse
 effect on each of the following general standards:

  1. Existing or planned public utilities, facilities or services are capable of supporting the proposed
 use in addition to the existing uses in the area;

 Page 35 of 85
The proposed home occupation is small in scale and will not increase demand on existing or
planned public utilities. (Affirmative finding)

2. The character of the area affected as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning
 district(s) within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of
 the municipal development plan;

The subject property is located within the Residential Low Intensity zone and is in a neighborhood
characterized predominantly by other single detached dwelling units on similarly sized lots. No
exterior changes are proposed for the home occupation, and only one resident employee is
proposed. There will be little, if any, evidence of the home occupation as perceived from the
neighborhood. (Affirmative finding)

3. The proposed use will not have nuisance impacts from noise, odor, dust, heat, and vibrations
 greater than typically generated by other permitted uses in the same zoning district;

Baking activities will take place within the existing kitchen. No impacts from noise, dust, heat, or
vibrations are anticipated. Baking produces an aroma, however, the activity will take place within
the existing kitchen, and odor impacts outside the building will be limited. (Affirmative finding)

4. The transportation system is capable of supporting the proposed use in addition to the existing
 uses in the area. Evaluation factors include street designations and capacity; level of service
 and other performance measures; access to arterial roadways; connectivity; transit
 availability; parking and access; impacts on pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation; safety
 for all modes; and adequate transportation demand management strategies;

Traffic impacts, if any, are expected to be minimal. Just one employee, a resident of the property,
will work the home occupation, and there will be some on-site pickup, though the applicant states
they are actively pursuing off-site pickup options. No commercial vehicle deliveries are
anticipated. (Affirmative finding)

 and,
5. The utilization of renewable energy resources;

Nothing within the application will preclude the use of wind, solar, geothermal, or other renewable
energy resource. (Affirmative finding)

 and,
6. Any standards or factors set forth in existing City bylaws and city and state ordinances;

The home occupation will be subject to any applicable city or state requirements. (Affirmative
finding as conditioned)

Article 5: Citywide General Regulations
Sec. 5.4.6, Home Occupations
 Pursuant to the requirements of 24 VSA 4412(4), it is the intent of these regulations to provide
 for the use of a minor portion of a dwelling unit for a home occupation and to ensure
 compatibility with other permitted uses and with the residential character of the neighborhood.
ZP-26-42 pg. 2 of 4

 Page 36 of 85
 Such a home occupation must clearly be secondary or incidental to the principal residential
 use, and so located and conducted that the average neighbor, under normal circumstances,
 would not otherwise be aware of its existence.
 (b) Conditional Use Review:
 All home occupations not otherwise eligible for administrative approval above shall
 require review and approval by the DRB pursuant to the requirements of Art. 3, Part 5. In
 addition to the conditional use criteria, the following criteria must be met for any home
 occupation:
 1. A home occupation shall be conducted solely by resident occupants plus no more than
 one additional full-time equivalent employee in RL districts, and no more than two (2)
 full-time equivalent employees in other districts. The home occupation shall be conducted
 entirely within an existing dwelling unit and/or one enclosed accessory structure;
 The home occupation will be operated solely by one resident occupant. (Affirmative
 finding)
 2. No more than thirty-five per cent (35%) of the floor area of said residence, including
 accessory structures, up to a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet,
 whichever is less, shall be used for such purpose;
 The home occupation will occupy up to ±237 sf in the first level of the principal structure;
 ±9% of the 2,702 sf total floor area of the dwelling unit. (Affirmative finding)
 3. No home occupation shall require alterations, construction or equipment that would
 change the fire rating of the structure or the fire district in which the structure is located;
 No construction, equipment or alterations are proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 4. There shall be no outside storage of any kind related to the home occupation;
 No outside storage is proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 5. There shall be no exterior evidence of the conduct of a home occupation except for:
 A. Occasional garage/lawn/yard type sales (up to twice a year not to exceed two (2)
 days each);
 None proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 and
 B. One non-illuminated attached parallel sign that shall not exceed two (2) square feet.
 No other signs shall be permitted.
 None proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 6. No home occupation may increase vehicular traffic flow or parking by more than one
 additional vehicle at a time for customers or deliveries. All parking shall be located off-
 street and shall maintain the required front yard setback;
 No substantial increase in vehicular traffic flow or parking are proposed. There will be
 occasional customer visits for pre-arranged pickup, and there will be no onsite retail
 activity. The existing driveway provides off-street parking for at least one vehicle.
 (Affirmative finding)


ZP-26-42 pg. 3 of 4

 Page 37 of 85
 7. No home occupation shall create sounds, noise, dust, vibration, smell, smoke, heat,
 humidity, glare, radiation, electrical interference, fire hazard or any other hazard,
 nuisance or unsightliness which is discernible from any adjacent dwelling unit;
 See Sec. 3.5.6 (a) 3 above.
 8. The home occupation shall be clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling
 for residential purposes and shall not change the character thereof or adversely affect
 the uses permitted in the residential district of which it is a part.
 As proposed, the home occupation will be inconsequential to the residential district in
 which it is located. (Affirmative finding)
 9. Delivery of products and materials related to the home occupation by vehicles other than
 automobiles shall occur no more than once per day;
 No commercial vehicle deliveries are proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 10. With the exception of one delivery per day, as specified in subparagraph (9), no more
 than one (1) commercial vehicle shall be allowed on the premises at any one time;
 See criterion 9 above.
 and
 11. There shall be no sale of goods except for goods fabricated on the premises as part of an
 approved home occupation.
 No retail activities will take place onsite. (Affirmative finding)

II. Conditions of Approval

 1. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with any applicable city or state requirements
 related to the proposed coffee roasting business.
 2. Standard Conditions 1-15.




ZP-26-42 pg. 4 of 4

 Page 38 of 85
Page 39 of 85
 Department of Permitting and Inspections
 645 Pine Street
 Burlington, VT 05401-8415
 Phone: (802) 865-7188
 www.burlingtonvt.gov/dpi


 Home Occupation Application Questionnaire

Use this checklist for all applications for a home occupation - See Sec. 5.4.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. This
questionnaire is provided to summarize details and is required to accompany a zoning permit application form and
required fee (for either administrative approval or conditional use review).

Please note:
 1. The specific requirements for home occupations can be found in Section 5.4.6 of the Comprehensive
 Development Ordinance which is available in its entirety on our website at www.burlingtonvt.gov/PZ
 2. A ‘Business Personal Property Registration Form’ may be required to be submitted to the Assessors Office.
 This form is available at www.burlingtonvt.gov/assessor/businesses

Name of Business Proposed: Sweet Jane's, LLC
 _____________________________________________________________________

Type of Business Proposed: Cottage Microbakery
 _____________________________________________________________________

Provide a detailed description of the proposed Home Occupation such as: activities involved; materials and equipment
used; quantities of materials and equipment stored on-site; methods of operation; hours of operation.
This may be done on a separate piece of paper and attached.

Please respond to the following:

1. How many persons will be involved or employed in the conduct of the proposed Home Occupation:
 Residents of premises: __________
 1 Others Total Number 1_______

2. What type of product will be produced, serviced, or repaired in the conduct of your Home Occupation? (For
 example: repair of clocks or watches, making jewelry, etc.). Explain:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 Gluten free and vegan doughnuts
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Describe any alterations to the home or premises that might be required to facilitate your Home Occupation:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 N/A
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Describe what rooms will be used in the conduct of the Home Occupation and how these rooms will be used.
 (For example: garage will be used to store supplies; or den will contain desk and file cabinets, etc.). Indicate
 the gross floor area(s) that will be used in the conduct of the Home Occupation. Indicate the total gross floor
 areas of your house and include any accessory structure(s) to be used for the Home Occupation, (Ex. Garage).
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 Existing home kitchen, equipment, and pantry storage will be used. Gross area to be used is 237 sq. ft.
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Describe the mechanical and/or electrical equipment that will be necessary to conduct your business activity:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 I will be using my existing gas stove and oven.
 _______________________________________________________________________________________

6. Describe how, where and in what amounts the material, supplies and/or equipment related to your Home
 Occupation will be displayed or stored:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 I will store the ingredients on shelves in the existing pantry. I will either keep them in the original resealable
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 packaging or, for bulk-purchased flours, in food-grade airtight storage bins. Because I don't anticipate (nor want)
 large orders, my storage needs will be minimal.
 PLEASE TURN OVER

 July 2020

 Page 40 of 85
7. Will people come to your home to obtain any product or utilize any service connected with the proposed Home
 Occupation activity? Yes ___________ No X ___________
 If yes, please explain in detail:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 Customers will order in advance and have a specific pickup day and time. To protect my privacy and offer convenience,
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 I'm actively pursuing ways to have pickup in a public area and/or partner with an existing business to host pickup.
8. Are any signs necessary or proposed relative to the Home Occupation?
 Yes _______ No ________
 X
 If yes, you are required to file for a Sign Permit. An application form can be obtained at the Planning and
 Zoning Department or on our website.

9. If trucks or other equipment will be used in your Home Occupation, where will they be parked or stored?
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 N/A
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

10. Will the Home Occupation involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the
 premises? Yes No X
 If yes, please explain:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

11. How may parking spaces will be provided for the home occupation?  ________________________________
 N/A
 Where will they be located? Indicate parking spaces on a site plan of this property as part of your application
 submission.

12. Is your proposed Home Occupation in conformance with the conditions, covenants and restrictions pertaining
 to your property? Yes  X No
 We suggest checking your deed for conditions, covenants and restrictions.




I have read and understand ‘Sec 5.4.6 Home Occupations’ under the City of Burlington Comprehensive Development
Ordinance and believe that to the best of my knowledge my proposed Home Occupation would not violate any portion
of said Ordinance:

Applicant’s Signature: Jane Marie Dunbar
 ________________________________________

Date: _________________
 2/4/2026



Property Owner’s Signature: ___________________________________
 Jane Marie Dunbar

Date: 2/4/2026
 _________________




 July 2020

 Page 41 of 85
Page 42 of 85
Page 43 of 85
Page 44 of 85
 Department of Permitting and Inspections
 645 Pine Street
 Burlington, VT 05401-8415
 Phone: (802) 865-7188
 www.burlingtonvt.gov/dpi


 Home Occupation Application Questionnaire

Use this checklist for all applications for a home occupation - See Sec. 5.4.6 of the Zoning Ordinance. This
questionnaire is provided to summarize details and is required to accompany a zoning permit application form and
required fee (for either administrative approval or conditional use review).

Please note:
 1. The specific requirements for home occupations can be found in Section 5.4.6 of the Comprehensive
 Development Ordinance which is available in its entirety on our website at www.burlingtonvt.gov/PZ
 2. A ‘Business Personal Property Registration Form’ may be required to be submitted to the Assessors Office.
 This form is available at www.burlingtonvt.gov/assessor/businesses

Name of Business Proposed: _____________________________________________________________________

Type of Business Proposed: _____________________________________________________________________

Provide a detailed description of the proposed Home Occupation such as: activities involved; materials and equipment
used; quantities of materials and equipment stored on-site; methods of operation; hours of operation.
This may be done on a separate piece of paper and attached.

Please respond to the following:

1. How many persons will be involved or employed in the conduct of the proposed Home Occupation:
 Residents of premises: __________ Others Total Number _______

2. What type of product will be produced, serviced, or repaired in the conduct of your Home Occupation? (For
 example: repair of clocks or watches, making jewelry, etc.). Explain:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Describe any alterations to the home or premises that might be required to facilitate your Home Occupation:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Describe what rooms will be used in the conduct of the Home Occupation and how these rooms will be used.
 (For example: garage will be used to store supplies; or den will contain desk and file cabinets, etc.). Indicate
 the gross floor area(s) that will be used in the conduct of the Home Occupation. Indicate the total gross floor
 areas of your house and include any accessory structure(s) to be used for the Home Occupation, (Ex. Garage).
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Describe the mechanical and/or electrical equipment that will be necessary to conduct your business activity:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 _______________________________________________________________________________________

6. Describe how, where and in what amounts the material, supplies and/or equipment related to your Home
 Occupation will be displayed or stored:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

 PLEASE TURN OVER

 July 2020

 Page 45 of 85
7. Will people come to your home to obtain any product or utilize any service connected with the proposed Home
 Occupation activity? Yes ___________ No ___________
 If yes, please explain in detail:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

8. Are any signs necessary or proposed relative to the Home Occupation?
 Yes _______ No ________
 If yes, you are required to file for a Sign Permit. An application form can be obtained at the Planning and
 Zoning Department or on our website.

9. If trucks or other equipment will be used in your Home Occupation, where will they be parked or stored?
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

10. Will the Home Occupation involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the
 premises? Yes No
 If yes, please explain:
 ________________________________________________________________________________________
 ________________________________________________________________________________________

11. How may parking spaces will be provided for the home occupation? ________________________________
 Where will they be located? Indicate parking spaces on a site plan of this property as part of your application
 submission.

12. Is your proposed Home Occupation in conformance with the conditions, covenants and restrictions pertaining
 to your property? Yes No
 We suggest checking your deed for conditions, covenants and restrictions.




I have read and understand ‘Sec 5.4.6 Home Occupations’ under the City of Burlington Comprehensive Development
Ordinance and believe that to the best of my knowledge my proposed Home Occupation would not violate any portion
of said Ordinance:

Applicant’s Signature: ________________________________________

Date: _________________



Property Owner’s Signature: ___________________________________

Date: _________________




 July 2020

 Page 46 of 85
 Department of Permitting and Inspections
 645 Pine Street
 Burlington, VT 05401-8415
 Phone: (802) 865-7188
 www.burlingtonvt.gov/dpi

 Zoning Permit Application – Owner’s Signature & Consent
 For use when the applicant is acting on behalf of the property owner.

PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS: 72-74 Cedar Street, Burlington
 ____________________________________________________________
 VT,05401
PROPERTY
OWNER*:____________________________________
 Lois M. Grimard APPLICANT:________________________________
 Bradley Grimard
*If condominium unit, written approval from the Association is also required


POSTAL ADDRESS: __________________________ POSTAL ADDRESS: __________________________
 72 Cedar Street
 74 Cedar Street
CITY, ST, ZIP: _______________________________ CITY, ST, ZIP: _______________________________
 Burlington VT, 05401
 Burlington, VT, 05401
DAY PHONE: ________________________________ DAY PHONE: ________________________________
 8605593538
 8028632767
EMAIL: _____________________________________ EMAIL: _____________________________________
 lmgrimard@gmail.com Bradley.grimard@gmail.com
SIGNATURE: ________________________________ SIGNATURE: ________________________________

Property owner signature authorizes the applicant (if noted) to act on owner’s behalf for all matters pertaining to this zoning
permit application. Signature also consents to the proposed work and to inspection by city zoning staff to close out the zoning
permit upon project completion.
Description of Proposed Project:______________________________________________________________
 I would like to start a pottery business out of my apartment at 72
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 Cedar The
 will be made to any existing structures. Street. No changes
 business  will take place in the basement where the
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 pottery  is made
 will be fired. I willand
 notthe
 be garage  where it
 selling pottery out of the house or property.




 June 2021
 Page 47 of 85
Department of Permitting & Inspections William Ward, Director
 Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
645 Pine Street Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner
Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Permit Technician
Telephone:(802) 865-7188 Collin Naheedy, Code Compliance Officer




 TO: Development Review Board
 FROM: Kirk Dressing
 DATE: March 25, 2026
 RE: ZP-25-615; 72-74 Cedar Street
 ======================================================================
 Note: These are staff comments only; decisions on projects are made by the Development
 Review Board, which may approve, deny, table or modify any project. THE APPLICANT
 OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND THE MEETING.

 Zone: RM Ward: 2

 Owner/Applicant: Bradley Grimard

 Request: Establish pottery home occupation.

 Applicable Regulations:
 Article 3 (Applications, Permits, & Project Reviews), Article 5 (Citywide General Regulations)

 Background Information:
 The applicant is requesting approval to establish a pottery home occupation business. The
 property is duplex dwelling unit and is located in a residential zone. The home occupation is
 subject to conditional use review. No site or exterior building changes are proposed.

 Previous zoning actions for this property are noted below.
  ZP-04-299 (07/12/2004) – Approval to replace wooden clapboard siding on duplex and
 garage with vinyl siding.
  ZP-1993-269 (07/06/1993) – Approval for window changes to rear and side of existing
 duplex. No change to footprint or use.

 Recommendation: Consent approval as per, and subject to, the following findings and
 conditions:

 I. Findings
 Article 3: Applications, Permits, and Reviews
 Part 5, Conditional Use & Major Impact Review:
 Section 3.5.6 (a) Conditional Use Review Standards
 Approval shall be granted only if the DRB, after public notice and public hearing, determines that
 the proposed conditional use and associated development shall not result in an undue adverse
 effect on each of the following general standards:

  1. Existing or planned public utilities, facilities or services are capable of supporting the proposed
 use in addition to the existing uses in the area;


 Page 48 of 85
The proposed home occupation is small in scale and will not increase demand on existing or
planned public utilities. (Affirmative finding)

2. The character of the area affected as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning
 district(s) within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of
 the municipal development plan;

The subject property is located within the Residential Medium Intensity zone and is in a
neighborhood characterized predominantly by other multi-unit, duplex, and single detached
dwelling units on similarly sized lots. No exterior changes are proposed for the home occupation,
and only one resident employee is proposed. There will be little, if any, evidence of the home
occupation as perceived from the neighborhood. (Affirmative finding)

3. The proposed use will not have nuisance impacts from noise, odor, dust, heat, and vibrations
 greater than typically generated by other permitted uses in the same zoning district;

Pottery activities will take place within the existing basement and detached garage. No impacts
from noise, dust, heat, or vibrations are anticipated. As the activity will take place within the
existing basement and garage, odor impacts outside the building will be limited. (Affirmative
finding)

4. The transportation system is capable of supporting the proposed use in addition to the existing
 uses in the area. Evaluation factors include street designations and capacity; level of service
 and other performance measures; access to arterial roadways; connectivity; transit
 availability; parking and access; impacts on pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation; safety
 for all modes; and adequate transportation demand management strategies;

Traffic impacts, if any, are expected to be minimal. Just one employee, a resident of the property,
will work the home occupation, and there will be no retail activity on-site. No commercial vehicle
deliveries are anticipated. (Affirmative finding)

 and,
5. The utilization of renewable energy resources;

Nothing within the application will preclude the use of wind, solar, geothermal, or other renewable
energy resource. (Affirmative finding)

 and,
6. Any standards or factors set forth in existing City bylaws and city and state ordinances;

The home occupation will be subject to any applicable city or state requirements. (Affirmative
finding as conditioned)

Article 5: Citywide General Regulations
Sec. 5.4.6, Home Occupations
 Pursuant to the requirements of 24 VSA 4412(4), it is the intent of these regulations to provide
 for the use of a minor portion of a dwelling unit for a home occupation and to ensure
 compatibility with other permitted uses and with the residential character of the neighborhood.
ZP-25-615 pg. 2 of 4

 Page 49 of 85
 Such a home occupation must clearly be secondary or incidental to the principal residential
 use, and so located and conducted that the average neighbor, under normal circumstances,
 would not otherwise be aware of its existence.
 (b) Conditional Use Review:
 All home occupations not otherwise eligible for administrative approval above shall
 require review and approval by the DRB pursuant to the requirements of Art. 3, Part 5. In
 addition to the conditional use criteria, the following criteria must be met for any home
 occupation:
 1. A home occupation shall be conducted solely by resident occupants plus no more than
 one additional full-time equivalent employee in RL districts, and no more than two (2)
 full-time equivalent employees in other districts. The home occupation shall be conducted
 entirely within an existing dwelling unit and/or one enclosed accessory structure;
 The home occupation will be operated solely by one resident occupant. (Affirmative
 finding)
 2. No more than thirty-five per cent (35%) of the floor area of said residence, including
 accessory structures, up to a maximum of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet,
 whichever is less, shall be used for such purpose;
 The home occupation will occupy up to ±413 sf in the basement and detached garage;
 35% of the 1,172 sf total floor area of the dwelling unit. (Affirmative finding)
 3. No home occupation shall require alterations, construction or equipment that would
 change the fire rating of the structure or the fire district in which the structure is located;
 No construction, equipment or alterations are proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 4. There shall be no outside storage of any kind related to the home occupation;
 No outside storage is proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 5. There shall be no exterior evidence of the conduct of a home occupation except for:
 A. Occasional garage/lawn/yard type sales (up to twice a year not to exceed two (2)
 days each);
 None proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 and
 B. One non-illuminated attached parallel sign that shall not exceed two (2) square feet.
 No other signs shall be permitted.
 None proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 6. No home occupation may increase vehicular traffic flow or parking by more than one
 additional vehicle at a time for customers or deliveries. All parking shall be located off-
 street and shall maintain the required front yard setback;
 No substantial increase in vehicular traffic flow or parking are proposed. There will be
 occasional customer visits for pre-arranged pickup, and there will be no onsite retail
 activity. (Affirmative finding)



ZP-25-615 pg. 3 of 4

 Page 50 of 85
 7. No home occupation shall create sounds, noise, dust, vibration, smell, smoke, heat,
 humidity, glare, radiation, electrical interference, fire hazard or any other hazard,
 nuisance or unsightliness which is discernible from any adjacent dwelling unit;
 See Sec. 3.5.6 (a) 3 above.
 8. The home occupation shall be clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling
 for residential purposes and shall not change the character thereof or adversely affect
 the uses permitted in the residential district of which it is a part.
 As proposed, the home occupation will be inconsequential to the residential district in
 which it is located. (Affirmative finding)
 9. Delivery of products and materials related to the home occupation by vehicles other than
 automobiles shall occur no more than once per day;
 No commercial vehicle deliveries are proposed. (Affirmative finding)
 10. With the exception of one delivery per day, as specified in subparagraph (9), no more
 than one (1) commercial vehicle shall be allowed on the premises at any one time;
 See criterion 9 above.
 and
 11. There shall be no sale of goods except for goods fabricated on the premises as part of an
 approved home occupation.
 No retail activities will take place onsite. (Affirmative finding)

II. Conditions of Approval

  1. It is the applicant’s responsibility to comply with any applicable city or state requirements
 related to the proposed pottery business.
  2. Standard Conditions 1-15.




ZP-25-615 pg. 4 of 4

 Page 51 of 85
Department of Permitting & Inspections William Ward, Director
 Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
645 Pine Street Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner
Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Permit Technician
Telephone:(802) 865-7188 Collin Naheedy, Code Compliance Officer
(802) 865-7195 (FAX)



 TO: Development Review Board
 FROM: Scott Gustin
 DATE: March 25, 2026
 RE: ZP-26-69; 125 Lakeside Avenue
 ======================================================================
 Note: These are staff comments only; decisions on projects are made by the Development
 Review Board, which may approve, deny, table or modify any project. THE APPLICANT
 OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND THE MEETING.

 Zone: E-LM Ward: 5

 Owner/Applicant: Ride Your Bike, LLC/John Caulo

 Request: Final plat review of 3-lot subdivision and area for future road right-of-way. No
 development included.

 Applicable Regulations:
 Article 4 (Zoning Maps and Districts), Article 6 (Development Criteria & Guidelines), and Article
 10 (Subdivision)

 Background Information:
 The applicant is seeking final plat approval for a 3-lot subdivision and related delineation of rights-
 of-way for future streets. No development is included in this subdivision. All development
 anticipated on the subject lands is to be pursued under separate zoning permit.

 Preliminary plat approval was granted by the Development Review Board on February 19, 2026
 subject to the following conditions:
 1. This preliminary plat approval in no way grants or implies final plat approval.
 2. Within 1 year of preliminary plat approval, a complete final plat application shall be
 submitted. Otherwise, the preliminary plat approval will expire unless extended by the DRB
 following written request by the applicant.
 3. Preliminary plat comments from the Department of Public Works shall be addressed prior to
 final plat review and approval:
 a. The depicted future street right-of-way needs to be 50.5’ wide (not 50’ as depicted);
 b. Total right-of-way area (0.5 acre vs. 0.62) must be clarified;
 c. Curb cut access permit will be required; and,
 d. Note on the plat that the concrete sidewalk at the northern property boundary is
 private.

 The final plat application was filed February 25, 2026, well within 1 year of preliminary plat
 approval. The Public Works’ conditions have been met as reflected on the final plat. The future
 “Innovation Lane” right-of-way is depicted as 50.5’ wide, the total ROW area is noted as 0.5 acre,
 and “private” is noted along the northerly concrete sidewalk paralleling Lakeside Avenue.


 Page 52 of 85
 Recommendation: Final plat approval as per, and subject to, the following findings and
 conditions.

 I. Findings

 Article 4: Maps & Districts
 Sec. 4.5.6, South End Innovation District Overlay:
 (a) Areas Covered
 The proposed development site is entirely within the SEID overlay.

 (b) District Specific Regulations
 Table 4.5.6-1:SEID Dimensional Standards & Density


 Max. Max. Lot
 Block Intensity Max Building Coverage & Minimum Building Setbacks 6 Max.
 Perimeter1 (floor area Size per Pervious Surface Front Side Rear Height7
 ratio2,3) Floorplate4,5 Required6


 Floors 1-6:
 15,000 sq. ft. 80% max
 impervious 0’ min 0’ min 0’ min
 1,600’ 2.5 Floors 7-8: 85’
 max FAR 10,000 sq. ft. 20’ max5 20’ max5 20’ max6
 Except as
 permitted by
 Sec.4.5.6 (c) 1
1. Blocks may be enclosed by any combination of streets within public Rights-of-Way or Public Paths. Where a property abuts a
 railroad or area identified as Wetland, Conservation or Natural Area on Map 4.5.3-1 Natural Resource Protection Overlay
 District, such boundaries may serve as enclosing block boundaries.
2. Floor area ratio is described in Sec 5.2.7.
3. Bonuses for additional FAR for inclusionary housing projects are described in Sec. 9.1.12.
4. Maximum square footage applies to each floorplate.
5. One parking structure per lot established as of January 1, 2023 may exceed the 15,000 sq. ft. floorplate maximum standard
 according to the following:
 a. When the structure contains a transit use, the maximum floorplate is 60,500 sq. ft., or
 b. When the structure does not contain a transit use, the maximum floor plate is 30,000 sq. ft.
6. Setbacks are measured from the property line; however, buildings must be at least 15’ from the curb or edge of a public Right of
 Way if no curb exists.
7. Maximum building height in the E-SEID shall be further limited by Map 4.5.6-2: SEID Specific Height Area Map.

 1. Dimensional Standards & Density
 Proposed lot 1 will be the site of the first building in what is anticipated to be a larger, more
 comprehensive development. Lots 1 and 3 comply with the maximum block perimeter
 standard in Table 4.5.6-1. Lot 2 is the remainder of the existing lot and will be further
 subdivided under separate application in the future. As proposed, lot 2 will lessen the
 degree of existing nonconformity as to block perimeter and is acceptable. (Affirmative
 finding)

 2. Frontage and Ground Floor Activation Standards
 Not applicable for subdivision review.

 3. Parking
 ZP-26-69 pg. 2 of 5

 Page 53 of 85
 Not applicable for subdivision review.

 4. Uses
 Not applicable for subdivision review.

Article 6: Development Review Standards:
Part 1: Land Division Design Standards
Section 6.1.2 Review Standards
(a) Protection of important natural features
The arrangement of blocks and lots shall preserve watercourses, wetlands, steep slopes, flood-
prone areas, rock outcroppings, wildlife habitat and travel corridors, specimen trees and
contiguous stands of forest, and other sensitive ecological and geological areas to the extent
practicable.
There are no significant natural features in the land to be subdivided. The existing conditions
consist largely of surface parking. (Affirmative finding)

(b) Block Size and Arrangement
The size and arrangement of new blocks shall maintain the size and arrangement of existing
neighborhood blocks within the zoning district, and support the pattern of interconnected streets
throughout the city.
See Sec. 4.5.6 above for block size and arrangement standards within the SEID overlay.

(c) Arrangement of Lots
The size and arrangement of new lots shall reflect and perpetuate the existing development pattern
of the surrounding neighborhood. Lots shall be created in such a way as to enable their
development pursuant to the requirements of this ordinance, and ensure a clear transfer of title.
The proposed lot sizes and arrangement reflect the dimensional standards of the SEID overlay.
Existing and proposed street frontages are incorporated. Just 3 lots are proposed, and they are
consistent with nearby parcel patterns in the SEID overlay.

Interior lot lines extending from a street should be perpendicular or radial to the street right-of-
way line to the greatest extent feasible. Flag lots and through lots are discouraged, and shall be
allowed only to the extent where topography and existing block and lot arrangement allow no
suitable alternative. In such cases, a minimum frontage for access of 20 feet shall be required.
No flag lots are proposed. Lots 1 and 3 are regularly shaped. As the remaining parcel, lot 2 is
somewhat irregular; however, even lot 2’s boundary lines are fairly regular in their configuration.
See also Sec. 4.5.6. (Affirmative finding)

(d) Connectivity of streets within the city street grid
The established grid of interconnected streets shall be maintained and extended to the extent
practicable. All streets shall be in conformance with applicable street design and construction
details as provided by the department of public works, and shall be dedicated to the city.
This initial subdivision utilizes existing street frontage along Lakeside Avenue and also creates
right-of-way space for a future public street (so-called “Innovation Lane” in ZP-26-18). The new
public street will provide street frontage for each of the proposed lots and, likely, future subdivided
lots. The future street right-of-way shows the initial stages of a future street grid. Note that area
for so-called “Cross Street (in ZP-26-18) between Lots 1 and 3 is just 20’ wide. This width is
much too narrow for a public street. It may be acceptable for a private access way. This area is
ZP-26-69 pg. 3 of 5

 Page 54 of 85
contiguous with the area for the future Innovation Lane. As one is intended to become public and
the other not, future subdivision of the right-of-way area for the two will likely be necessary.
(Affirmative finding as conditioned)

(e) Connectivity of sidewalks, trails, and natural systems
The established sidewalk network shall be maintained and extended to the extent possible. Trail
networks and uninterrupted corridors of greenspace outside of the established street grid should
be maintained and extended wherever possible. All sidewalks shall be in conformance with
applicable street design and construction details as provided by the department of public works,
and shall be dedicated to the city.
Sidewalks and multi-use paths shall be constructed to Department of Public Works standards and
dedicated to the city. No public sidewalks are depicted on the final plat plans. Rather, they are
included with the associated zoning permit for development on lot 1. (Affirmative finding)

Article 10: Subdivision
Sec. 10.1.8, Preliminary Plat Review
D. Review Criteria
Decisions by the DRB on a preliminary plat shall be based on the project’s conformance with the
following:
1. The requirements of the underlying zoning district(s) and all applicable overlay district(s) as set
 forth in Article 4;
 See Article 4 above.

2. The review criteria for Conditional Uses and Major Impact in Article 3, Part 5 where applicable;
 Not applicable.

3. The requirements of Article 5 with regard to Special Uses and Performance Standards as
 applicable; and,
 Not applicable.

4. The land division and site development principles and design standards in Article 6.
 See Article 6 above.

Sec. 10.1.10, Performance Bond and Guarantee of Completion
(a) Bonds and Securities
 New street rights-of-way are included in this subdivision application; however, construction of
 public infrastructure within those rights-of-way is included in separate permit (ZP-26-18).
 This criterion is addressed under that separate application. (Affirmative finding)

Sec. 10.1.12, Dedication and Acceptance of Public Facilities
So-called “Innovation Lane” is to become a new public street. It will be located within the future
street ROW between Lot 1 and Lot 2. Dedication and acceptance of this new street shall be
subject to the standards of this criterion. (Affirmative finding as conditioned)

II. Conditions of Approval
 1. Within 180 days of approval, a mylar copy of the approved final plat, with all
 applicable signatures, shall be filed in the city’s land records. Failure to do so renders
 this approval null and void.
ZP-26-69 pg. 4 of 5

 Page 55 of 85
 2. Dedication and acceptance of the new public street (so-called Innovation Lane) shall be
 subject to the standards of Sec. 10.1.12. The 20’ wide “future street” area between Lots
 1 and 3 is not to become a public street.
 3. Standard conditions 1-15.




ZP-26-69 pg. 5 of 5

 Page 56 of 85
Project Narrative for COA Level III Final Plat Subdivision

Project Site: 125 Lakeside Avenue. (Ward 5, E-LM, SEID, Tax No. 053-2-009-000).
Project: Ride Your Bike Building A
Property Owner: Ride Your Bike, LLC
Applicant: RYB Building A, LLC
Date: 24 February 2026



The parcel is 6.33 acre in size and currently used for surface parking. Specifically, the proposed subdivision
includes the creation of two additional lots and proposed public right-of-way (ROW) as follows:
 • Lot 1: 1.48 ac.
 • Lot 2: 3.75 ac.
 • Lot 3: 0.60 ac.
 • ROW: 0.50 ac.
 Total: 6.33 ac.

Responses to the preliminary plat comments from the Department of Public Works are as follows:
 a. The proposed right-of-way is 50.5ft wide, which has been noted on the Final Plat.
 b. The total right-of-way area is 0.5acres.
 c. A curb-cut access permit will be applied for after approval of the Final Plat.
 d. Notes have been added to the Final Plat that the existing concrete sidewalks at the northern
 property boundary are private.

No physical improvements are proposed with the subdivision application, therefore no construction
drawings, plans and profiles, are included in the proposed subdivision plat. The proposed subdivision
application meets the relevant sections of Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance as follows:

Article 4: Maps & Districts
Sec. 4.4.3, Enterprise Districts:
(a) Purpose
(4) Light Manufacturing (E-LM)
1. The Light Manufacturing (E-LM) district is the traditional commercial/industrial center of Burlington,
and is intended primarily to accommodate enterprises engaged in the manufacturing, processing,
distribution, design, creating, repairing, or assembling of physical and digital goods, merchandise,
equipment, or art. This district is primarily intended to provide for various industrial and commercial
uses, with specific provisions and limits intended to preserve and enhance areas of varied character
throughout district. In some locations, commercial and residential uses are allowed to support the wide
range of services and employment opportunities desired in the district, and support adjacent areas of
residential development. Development is intended to respect interspersed historic 1industrial buildings,
and reflect the industrial aesthetic of the district’s past. Parking is intended to be hidden within, behind,




 Page 57 of 85
or to the side of structures. This district includes the SEID overlay which is intended to facilitate the
redevelopment of a central portion of the E-LM into a walkable, mixed-use innovation district.

Sec. 4.5.6 South End Innovation District Overlay
(a) Purpose:
The South End Innovation District Overlay (SEID) is intended to provide for a dense, vibrant and dynamic
mixed-use district. The overlay is unique in its allowance for residential uses in that it limits the most
intensive manufacturing and industrial uses allowed elsewhere in the district. The overlay permits arts,
employment, and other non-residential uses intrinsic to an amenity-rich, convenient urban
neighborhood. Development is intended to be dense and highly sustainable. Lot coverage standards
permit significant development but a high degree of permeable surfaces achieved through green
stormwater infrastructure is encouraged. Buildings should range in height from one to eight stories, and
should be constructed of materials and in manners that limit embodied carbon and achieve the highest
possible energy performance permitted by the Vermont Building Code. Sites should incorporate ample
public and private open spaces and include extensive networks of accessible paths that are free of cars.
Streets should be constructed in a manner that allocates the majority of their space to pedestrians and
cyclists. Buildings should be oriented to the public realm – streets, paths and open spaces, in a manner
that creates a safe and inviting district. Site and building design should support public and ecological
health to the highest possible degree. Parking should be hidden behind structures, including perimeter
buildings or screening devices. Where possible, parking structures should be located along the most
heavily trafficked roads to encourage residents, employees and visitors who arrive by car to park at the
district’s edge and travel on foot, by bike, or other mode of transportation that is compatible with
Burlington’s climate objectives. Special consideration should be given to the design and construction of
parking structures to allow for their renovation to other uses in coming decades as Burlington evolves
from car dependence.

This project is a subdivision of land that will allow for future development in accordance with the E-LM
district and SEID overlay purpose.

(b) Dimensional Standards & Density




 Page 58 of 85
The proposed lots are less than 1,600lf perimeter. There are no minimum lot size or street frontage
requirements in the SEID zone. Building FAR, lot coverage, and building height are unaffected by the
proposed subdivision.

(c) Permitted & Conditional Uses

Not applicable for subdivision application.

(d) District Specific Regulations

Not applicable for subdivision application.

Article 6: Development Review Standards: Part 1, Land Division Design Standards
(a) Protection of important natural features

No physical improvements are proposed with the subdivision application. Further, the existing parcel is a
paved parking lot with no important natural features.

(b) Block size and arrangement

The size and arrangement of proposed blocks meet the SEID maximum Block Perimeter of 1,600ft and
the orthogonal layout established in the SECORD plan.




 Page 59 of 85
(c) Arrangement of Lots

The size and arrangement of proposed lots meet the SEID maximum Block Perimeter of 1,600ft and the
orthogonal layout established in the SECORD plan.

(d) Connectivity of streets within the city street grid

The subdivision plat depicts a new public street ROW that connects to Lakeside Avenue at the north and
an existing easement to Sears Lane at the south. Actual street construction details will be reviewed
separately as part of the 125 Lakeside Phase 1 zoning permit noted above. For the purposes of this
subdivision, the proposed public street ROW will enable connection of the lots to the city’s public street
network.

(e) Connectivity of sidewalks, trails, and natural systems

Street, sidewalk, and multi-purpose path connectivity will be reviewed and considered under a separate
zoning permit application for development. As noted above, the proposed public street ROW will enable
connectivity of streets and sidewalks within the subdivision to the city’s entire network.

Part 2, Site Plan Design Standards
Sec. 6.2.2, Review Standards

Not applicable for subdivision application.

Part 3, Architectural Design Standards
Sec. 6.3.2, Review Standards

Not applicable for subdivision application.

Article 10: Subdivision
Sec. 10.1.8, Preliminary Plat Review and Sec. 10.1.9, Final Plat Review

D. Review Criteria
Decisions by the DRB on a preliminary and final plat shall be based on the project’s
conformance with the following:

1. The requirements of the underlying zoning district(s) and all applicable overlay district(s) as set forth
in Article 4;
 See Article 4 above.

2. The review criteria for Conditional Uses and Major Impact in Article 3, Part 5 where applicable;




 Page 60 of 85
Not applicable for subdivision application.

3. The requirements of Article 5 with regard to Special Uses and Performance Standards as applicable;
and,

Not applicable for subdivision application.

4. The land division and site development principles and design standards in Article 6.

See Article 6 above.




 Page 61 of 85
Page 62 of 85
Page 63 of 85
Department of Permitting & Inspections William Ward, Director
 Scott Gustin, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner
Zoning Division Mary O’Neil, AICP, Principal Planner
645 Pine Street Kirk Dressing, Associate Planner
Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph Cava, Permit Technician
Telephone:(802) 865-7188 Collin Naheedy, Code Compliance Officer




 TO: Development Review Board
 FROM: Scott Gustin
 DATE: March 25, 2026
 RE: ZP-25-378; 451 Appletree Point Road
 ======================================================================
 Note: These are staff comments only; decisions on projects are made by the Development
 Review Board, which may approve, deny, table or modify any project. THE APPLICANT
 OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST ATTEND THE MEETING.

 Zone: RL Ward: 4N

 Owner/Applicant: Jamie Spano

 Request: After-the-fact tree removal and replacement with new trees. Replaced failing seawall
 and added additional seawall length.

 Applicable Regulations:
 Article 4 (Maps & Districts), Article 5 (Citywide General Regulations), Article 6 (Development
 Criteria & Guidelines)

 Background Information:
 The applicant is seeking approval for reconstruction and extension of a stone seawall and related
 tree clearing along the lakeshore. The work was done more than a year ago and is the subject of
 zoning enforcement. As the seawall is located partially below the 102’ elevation, it is subject to
 review under the flood hazard area regulations in addition to dimensional and design review
 standards. As required, the project is subject to review and approval by the State National
 Floodplain Insurance Program Coordinator at VT DEC. Comments have been provided and find
 that the seawall is compliant with applicable flood hazard area standards.

 Given the project location along the lakeshore, this application is subject to review by the
 Conservation Board. The Conservation Board reviewed this application at their December 1, 2025
 meeting. Due to limited replanting information, the Board continued review to a future meeting.
 Specifically, the Board requested a landscaping plan including the required low mow zone(s), new
 trees, and native plant species. Revised project plans were provided, reviewed, and approved by
 the Conservation Board at their March 2, 2026 meeting.

 Previous zoning actions for this property are noted below.
  11/2/18, Approval of as-built building and site changes
  7/21/15, Approval of demolition, construction of new duplex and related site improvements
  7/1/14, Approval of front yard setback variance
  7/26/04, Approval of 2-lot subdivision
  1/13/04, Denial of 3-lot subdivision


 Page 64 of 85
Recommendation: Certificate of appropriateness approval, as per, and subject to, the
following findings and conditions.

I. Findings

Article 4: Maps & Districts
Sec. 4.4.5, Residential Districts:
(a) Purpose
(1) Residential Low Density (RL)
This district is intended for relatively low density residential development that includes a mix of
housing types, generally including single family homes through quadplexes. The existing single
family residence is consistent with this intent. No change in use is proposed. (Affirmative
finding)

(b) Dimensional Standards
The subject property is accessed by a private road and has ~150’ of frontage. It will not change,
and the minimum required is 30.’

Setbacks generally remain unchanged. The reconstructed and extended seawall is allowed to
encroach into the waterfront setback. The two walkways are also permissible encroachments. At
the southeastern corner of the property, a former boathouse was removed when the existing home
was constructed. That was to be converted to green space; however, the area was instead
converted to patio space. The prior redevelopment of the property resulted in a net decrease of lot
coverage within the lakeshore setback of 121 sf. The patio is 132 sf. In order to avoid an increase
in nonconformity within the lakeshore setback, the patio needs to be reduced in size by 11 sf.
There is a 2nd patio just to the west that is an impermissible encroachment into the lakeshore
setback and needs to be removed. The applicant requests approval to retain this feature; however,
there is no provision to allow for this additional lakeshore setback encroachment.

The reconstructed section of seawall does not affect lot coverage. The extended section of seawall
and river stone installed inland of the entire length of seawall results in 1,162 sf of net new lot
coverage (6.5%) for a total of 27.8% lot coverage. The applicant proposes removing the river
stone. Doing so will reduce net new lot coverage by about half for a resultant ~23.8% lot
coverage. Removal of the impermissible 2nd patio will lower coverage slightly to 23.2%.

Height of the replacement and extended seawall will be similar to the existing seawall at up to ~
4.’

The number of dwelling units remains unchanged at 1.

The footprint of the principal structure remains unchanged. (Affirmative finding as conditioned)

(c) Permitted & Conditional Uses
The seawall is accessory to the permitted single family home. (Affirmative finding)

(d) District Specific Regulations
1. Additional Residential Development Permitted
(Not applicable)
ZP-25-378 pg. 2 of 7

 Page 65 of 85
2. Exceptions to Dimensional Standards
(Not applicable)

3. Exception for Neighborhood Commercial Uses
(Not applicable)

4. Miscellaneous Standards
(Not applicable)

5. Residential Development Bonuses
(Not applicable)

Sec. 4.5.4, Natural Resource Protection Overlay District:
(a) District Specific Regulations: Special Flood Hazard Area
(7) Special Review Criteria
A. The danger to life and property…
The seawall is located within the lakeshore flood hazard area. Lakeshore flood dynamics are
unlike those of river flood dynamics. The water does not flow at perceptible speeds and is not
subject to constriction. Placement of the seawall within the lakeshore flood zone will have no
impact on flood heights or velocities. (Affirmative finding)

B. The danger that material may be swept onto other lands…
The reconstructed and extended seawall is built of stone blocks and is anchored into the ground.
There is little danger that the structure will be swept away by flood waters. (Affirmative finding)

C. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems…
Not applicable.

D. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage…
The seawall is a protective measure against flood damage to the property. The potential for
flooding damage to the seawall itself is minimal. (Affirmative finding)

E. The importance of the services provided…
The seawall is of little importance to the Burlington community; however, it will provide
substantial protection to the private property that it is located on. (Affirmative finding)

F. The availability of alternative locations…
The point of the seawall is to protect the property from flood damage. Its placement within the
flood zone is key to this function. It’s location within the floodplain is acceptable. (Affirmative
finding)

G. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development…
Seawalls are commonplace along Burlington’s lakeshore. (Affirmative finding)

H. The relationship of the proposed use to the Municipal Development Plan…
The Municipal Development Plan does not address seawalls. It does speak to the development
pattern of relatively low density residential development within the RL zone. The subject property
ZP-25-378 pg. 3 of 7

 Page 66 of 85
contains a single family home. Insofar as homes along the lakeshore commonly have seawalls, the
proposal can be found in compliance with the MDP. (Affirmative finding)

I. The safety of access to the property…
The rebuilt and extended seawall will have no effect on the safety of access to the property during
times of flood. (Affirmative finding)

J. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise…
The maximum regulatory flood elevation along the lakeshore is 102’ above sea level. The seawall
will have no impact on flood heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, or sediment transport.
(Affirmative finding)

K. Conformance with all other applicable requirements…
See Articles 4, 5, and 6 of these findings.

(c) District Specific Regulations: Riparian and Littoral Conservation Zone
The subject property is affected by the Riparian and Littoral Conservation Zone (250’ width from
the 95.5’ lakeshore elevation). This overlay zone limits the clearing of vegetation and new
stormwater outfalls. No stormwater outfalls have been installed; however, trees were cleared to
rebuild and extend the seawall. As noted above, the Conservation Board approved the revised
project plans as presented at their March 2, 2026 meeting. (Affirmative finding)

Article 5: Citywide General Regulations
Sec. 5.2.3, Lot Coverage Requirements
No lot coverage exceptions are sought. (Not applicable)

Sec. 5.2.5, Setbacks
No permissible setback encroachments are sought. (Not applicable)

Sec. 5.2.6, Building Height Limits
No exceptions to height limits are sought. (Not applicable)

Sec. 5.2.7, Density Calculations
Density is unaffected. (Not applicable)

Sec. 5.5.1, Nuisance Regulations
Nothing in the proposal appears to result in creating a nuisance under this criterion. (Affirmative
finding)

Sec. 5.5.4, Tree Removal
(a) Review criteria for zoning permit requests for tree removal
(1) Grounds for approval
 Tree removal involving six (6) or more trees, each of ten (10) inches or greater in caliper or
 the removal of ten (10) or more trees, each of which is three (3) inches or greater in caliper
 during any consecutive twelve (12) month period may be permitted for any of the following
 reasons:

A. Removal of dead, diseased, or infested trees;
ZP-25-378 pg. 4 of 7

 Page 67 of 85
Not applicable.

B. Thinning of trees for the health of remaining trees according to recognized accepted
forestry practices;
Not applicable.

C. Removal of trees that are a danger to life or property; or,
Not applicable.

D. As part of a development with an approved zoning permit.
Project plans depict trees that were removed as well as new plantings that will be installed. The
new plantings consist of a variety of native species along the lakeshore and include several “low
mow” areas as required. The Conservation Board found that the proposed plantings are acceptable
mitigation for the trees removed. (Affirmative finding)

Sec. 5.5.3, Stormwater and Erosion Control
More than 400 sf of earthwork likely took place to rebuild and extend the seawall. No erosion
control plan was provided; however, the site is clearly stabilized at this point. (Affirmative
finding)

Article 6: Development Review Standards
Part 1, Land Division Design Standards
Not applicable.

Part 2, Site Plan Design Standards
Sec. 6.2.2, Review Standards
(a) Protection of important natural features
The subject property is located along the Lake Champlain shoreline. The shoreline is an identified
significant natural area. The property is affected by the Natural Resource Protection Overlay
District, specifically the riparian and littoral conservation zone, which stretches inland 250’ from
the 95.5’ lakeshore elevation. As noted previously, trees were cleared, and the revised landscaping
plan includes new plantings along the lakeshore to mitigate this loss. (Affirmative finding)

(b) Topographical alterations
The property slopes gently towards the lake and then drops significantly down to the lake along the
immediate shoreline. The seawall work retains this topography. (Affirmative finding)

(c) Protection of important public views
The seawall will not adversely impact public views across the lake and towards the Adirondacks.
(Affirmative finding)

(d) Protection of important cultural resources
The property contains no known archaeological resources. Much of the lakeshore is
archaeologically sensitive. Fortunately, relatively little new construction along the lakeshore was
done to extend the seawall. (Affirmative finding)

(e) Supporting the use of alternative energy
Not applicable.
ZP-25-378 pg. 5 of 7

 Page 68 of 85
(f) Brownfield sites
Not applicable.

(g) Provide for nature’s events
See Sec. 5.5.3.

(h) Building location and orientation
Not applicable.

(i) Vehicular access
Not applicable.

(j) Pedestrian access
Not applicable.

(k) Accessibility for the handicapped
Not applicable.

(l) Parking and circulation
Not applicable.

(m) Landscaping, fences, and retaining walls
Height of the seawall does not extend above 5;’ however, it will satisfy this requirement anyway.
It is constructed of natural stone blocks. (Affirmative finding)

(n) Public plazas and open space
Not applicable.

(o) Outdoor lighting
Not applicable.

(p) Integrate infrastructure into the design
Not applicable.

Part 3, Architectural Design Standards
Sec. 6.3.2, Review Standards
Not applicable.

II. Conditions of Approval

 1. All work associated with this zoning permit shall be complete by September 15, 2026.
 2. Prior to release of the zoning permit, revised project plans shall be submitted, subject to
 staff review and approval. Revised project plans shall delete the western of the two patios
 in the southeastern corner of the site and shall also delete the river rock / gravel inland of
 the seawall. The remaining patio shall be reduced in size by 11 square feet.
 3. In all Special Flood Hazard Areas (including Floodway areas) such conditions require
 that:
ZP-25-378 pg. 6 of 7

 Page 69 of 85
 All development:
 (i) New construction and/or substantial improvements to structures shall be
 reasonably safe from flooding and be:
 1. Designed and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or
 lateral movement during the occurrence of the base flood;
 2. Constructed of materials resistant to flood damage;
 3. Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; and
 4. Constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air
 conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed
 and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating
 within the components during conditions of flooding;
 (ii) All development shall be designed to minimize flood damage to the
 proposed development and to public facilities and utilities;
 (iii)All development shall be designed to provide adequate surface drainage to
 reduce exposure to flood hazards;
 (iv) All new construction and substantial improvements that have fully enclosed
 areas below the lowest floor shall:
 1. Be solely used for parking of vehicles, storage, or building access, and
 such a condition shall clearly be stated on any permits; and,
 2. Be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on
 exterior walls by allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters. Such
 designs must be certified by a registered professional engineer or
 architect, or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria: A
 minimum of two openings of two walls having a total net area of not less
 than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to
 flooding shall be provided. The bottom of all openings shall be no higher
 than one foot above grade. Openings may be equipped with screens,
 louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit
 the automatic entry and exit of floodwaters;
 (v) All necessary permits shall be obtained from those governmental agencies
 from which approval is required by federal or state law.
 4. The Applicant/Property Owner is responsible for obtaining all necessary Building Permits
 through the Department of Permitting & Inspections as well as other permit(s) as may be
 required.
 5. Standard permit conditions 1-15.




ZP-25-378 pg. 7 of 7

 Page 70 of 85
 x 99.6

 x
 6
  5.
10



  105.3 x

 x 99.0

 x 99.0

 x
  107.6




 x 99.4
 107.1 x SITE
 LAT: N44° 30' 08" KREBS &
 LONG: W73° 16' 20"
 LANSING
 CONSULTING ENGINEERS
 164 Main Street, Suite 201 P: (802) 878-0375
 Colchester, Vermont 05446 www.krebsandlansing.com




 STAMP:



 LOCATION MAP
 106.8 x SCALE: 1" = 5,000 FT
 x 98.7




 106.9 x
 x 99.1 314.7 x

 x 99.2

 x
 .9
 10 6




 Project:

 x 99.0
 451
 106.7 x
 APPLETREE
 POINT ROAD


 Project No. 25251
 106.5 x
 x 100.0 as noted
 Scale
 Drawn by TJB/AMR


 Checked by
 Date 08/29/2025
 106.3 x
 x 102.9
 Revisions
 No. Date Description
 11/04/2025 cross section
 12/03/2025 plan view




 Drawing Title

 Existing
 Conditions Plan

 Drawing No.



 X-1
 Page 71 of 85
Page 72 of 85
Page 73 of 85
Page 74 of 85
Page 75 of 85
Page 76 of 85
Page 77 of 85
Page 78 of 85
Page 79 of 85
Page 80 of 85
Page 81 of 85
Page 82 of 85
Page 83 of 85
2021 Google Earth Legend
 451 Appletree Point Rd




 ➤
 N
 100 ftPage 84 of 85
  2025 Google Earth Legend
 451 Appletree Point Rd




 ➤
 N
Image © 2025 Airbus 100 ftPage 85 of 85