Ethics Commission — Portland, ME
Date: 2025-10-28
Time: 18:00

ETHICS COMMISSION MEMBERS
 Carolyn Braun
 Peter Goldman
Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 6:00 PM Jennifer Goodwin
Via Zoom William Hayward
 Maria Maffucci
 Rosemary Paine
 Jennifer Wriggins



REMOTE ACCESS INFORMATION:
https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/84432517532?pwd=3Beeaa67m3EThvpV6w0WTW1jWz2lFa.1
The Ethics Commission will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom pursuant to the Remote Meeting Policy.
Allow your computer to install the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to
attend live either in person or via Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the
meeting.

For public comment via Zoom, you will need to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise your hand via the
telephone, please hit *9. You will be unmuted by the host when it is time for public comment.

https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/84432517532?pwd=3Beeaa67m3EThvpV6w0WTW1jWz2lFa.1

PUBLIC COMMENT INFORMATION:
To submit written public comment on an agenda item, email ethics@portlandmaine.gov. Submissions must be
received by 12:00 pm the day before the Ethics Commission meeting to guarantee their inclusion in the agenda
packet. All submissions must include the commenter's name and legal address. To help ensure your comment is
submitted for the correct item, please include the name of the agenda item (see below).


AGENDA:

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting

 i. Ethics Meeting- Tuesday, September, 30, 2025
4. Unfinished Business

 i. Draft Code of Ethics (Continued)
 Review of the Intro Section
 Review of the Conflict of Interest Section
5. Hour Mark-10 Minute Recess

6. New Business


 1
7. Public Comment

 i. Members of the public may speak on any item on the agenda for 3 minutes.
8. Next Meeting Date

 i. Tuesday, November 25, 2025
9. Adjourn




 2

ETHICS COMMISSION MEMBERS
 Carolyn Braun
 Peter Goldman
Tuesday, October 28, 2025 at 6:00 PM Jennifer Goodwin
Via Zoom William Hayward
 Maria Maffucci
 Rosemary Paine
 Jennifer Wriggins



REMOTE ACCESS INFORMATION:
https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/84432517532?pwd=3Beeaa67m3EThvpV6w0WTW1jWz2lFa.1
The Ethics Commission will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom pursuant to the Remote Meeting Policy.
Allow your computer to install the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to
attend live either in person or via Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the
meeting.

For public comment via Zoom, you will need to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise your hand via the
telephone, please hit *9. You will be unmuted by the host when it is time for public comment.

https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/84432517532?pwd=3Beeaa67m3EThvpV6w0WTW1jWz2lFa.1

PUBLIC COMMENT INFORMATION:
To submit written public comment on an agenda item, email ethics@portlandmaine.gov. Submissions must be
received by 12:00 pm the day before the Ethics Commission meeting to guarantee their inclusion in the agenda
packet. All submissions must include the commenter's name and legal address. To help ensure your comment is
submitted for the correct item, please include the name of the agenda item (see below).


AGENDA:

1. Call to Order

2. Roll Call

3. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting

 i. Ethics Meeting- Tuesday, September, 30, 2025
4. Unfinished Business

 i. Draft Code of Ethics (Continued)
 Review of the Intro Section
 Review of the Conflict of Interest Section
5. Hour Mark-10 Minute Recess

6. New Business


 1

 Page 1
7. Public Comment

 i. Members of the public may speak on any item on the agenda for 3 minutes.
8. Next Meeting Date

 i. Tuesday, November 25, 2025
9. Adjourn




 2

 Page 2
 City of Portland-Ethics Commission

Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2025 at 5:00 pm-Meeting Minutes


Attendees
Carolyn Braun, Peter Goldman, Jennnifer Goodwin, Will Hayward, Jennifer Wiggins

Not present: Maria Maffucci, Rosemary Paine

Staff: Rachel Millette, Associate Corporation Counsel


Agenda

 1. Call to Order
Peter Goldman (Chair) called the meeting to order at 6:01 pm

 2. Approval of Minutes from Previous Meeting, August 27, 2025
Minutes were unanimously approved as submitted

 3. Unfinished Business
 I. Draft Code of Ethics (Continued)

​ Peter asked Rachel if the Commission could have Word versions of the ethics
codes. Rachel will send Word versions of Portland Codes and will get permission from
the other communities.
​ Participation from the public: The committee received 1 document. We will
address how to invite and accept input in New Business, later tonight.
 -Begin to create Code of Ethics:
Carolyn suggested that the commission look at the Minneapolis Code

8:18 - 13:14 Clarification of the Commission’s oversight and purpose


13:41 - 39:03 Discussion on where to begin, what will be included, what will be the
process and who is the audience regarding the Code of Ethics:

39:22 - 54:55 Creating a draft:
 Intro: Will Hayward, Jennifer Goodwin




 Page 3
 Standards of Conduct
 Conflict of Interest: Peter Goldman, Carolyn Braun
 Confidential information
 Disclosure Statement
 Consequences for violations

1:06:00 - 1:22:19 Draft (con’t)
​ Conflict of Interest: Peter Goldman, Carolyn Braun
Will suggested that the creators of this section be mindful of what is included in the
present code, since it will be repealed by the new Code. Rachel suggested that the
writers be mindful of two clear legal pieces : statute 30AMRS2605, Charter provision
article 7:1

4.The Chair calls for a 10-minute recess at the hour mark


5. Next Steps: Begin to develop the Code

Peter suggested, and commission members agreed that Commissioners might focus on
the following codes and distill out the best features
 1. The current COE of City Council
 2. School Board ethics code
 3. Cape Elizabeth
 4. Bangor

6. New Business 1:23:00 - 1:33:11
 Public Comment Process
 ​ At end of meeting, 3 minutes/person
 Future agenda: Accountability officer

7. Next Meeting Date
 i. Tuesday, October 28, 2025 (Via zoom)

8. Meeting adjourned at 7:30




 Page 4
 City of Portland Maine
 Code of Ethics

Overview/Preamble

The City of Portland Maine government exists to serve the people of Portland. In order to
do so effectively, the people must have confidence and trust in the integrity of their city
government. They deserve elected and appointed officials, and city employees who
maintain the highest ethical principles and avoid misconduct and conflicts of interest,
apparent or real. Effective democracy depends on a government that is fair, ethical and
accountable to the people it serves.

The code of ethics is designed to promote high ethical standards and conduct, and to
foster a healthy ethical culture throughout city government. The code defines city values
and sets a clear, minimum expectation for performance in the service of the City of
Portland. Inherently, high ethical standards may set forth tenets more rigorous than city
or state laws and statutes.




 Page 5
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY


 CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE

 CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST POLICY

 Preamble

 Citizens’ faith in government and its even-handed application to all is
fragile. Faith in government rests in part on the assumption that elected and
appointed officials, and the government’s employees, will execute their duties
fairly and without favoritism.

 It is the law in Maine that certain acts and proceedings of municipalities and
quasi-municipal corporations, and their officials, are voidable and actionable if the
act or proceeding is tainted by a conflict of interest. It is also the law in Maine that
an impermissible conflict of interest may be direct or indirect and may be non-
monetary as well as pecuniary.

 To head off – as much as possible – disputes that might trigger these laws or
undermine the public’s trust in government, the City of Portland, Maine (“Portland”
or the “City”) requires all compensated personnel, including but not limited to
employees and independent contractors (collectively, “Employees”), to adhere to
the provisions, terms and conditions of this Conflict-of-Interest Policy (“Policy” or
“Conflicts Policy”).

 The City also requires all non-compensated persons associated with the City
and acting in its name or on its behalf, including but not limited to elected officials,
advisors, appointees, volunteers (collectively, “Officials”), to adhere to the
provisions, terms and conditions of this Conflicts Policy.

 To be clear, and for the avoidance of doubt, adherence to the provisions,
terms and conditions of this Conflicts Policy is a material requirement, and
condition of, each Official’s and Employee’s association with the City.

 Policy Statement

 The City requires its Employees and Officials to avoid any relationship,
activity, or ownership that might create a conflict between their personal interest
and the interest of the City in any of its business dealings.

 The City expects its Employees and Officials to adhere to strict

 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 1 of 6



 Page 6
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY


standards of loyalty and ethics in avoiding situations that might be thought
to influence their actions or prejudice their judgment in handling City
business. They are expected to avoid allowing themselves to become
obligated in any way to third parties, such as individuals and/or firms with
which they deal, and to show no preference to third parties based on self or
family or friendship interest.

 The possibility of a conflict is particularly sensitive for those Employees
and Officials whose jobs or association with the City involve their making
decisions for the City in its dealings with members of the public.

 The possibility of conflict exists as well for those advising the decision
maker, who are in a position to influence or make recommendations concerning
these decisions.

 Application

 A conflict of interest exists when the loyalties or actions of an Official or
Employee are divided between the interests of the City and the interest of the
Official or Employee. Both the fact and the appearance of a conflict of interest
should be avoided.

 Duty of Care/General

 It is the Employee’s and the Official’s primary duty to represent the
City at all times to the best of their ability. Therefore, no Employee or Official
should become involved in any situation which would impair or interfere with
this primary duty.

 While it is the responsibility of each individual Employee and Official
to recognize conflict-of-interest situations, should they be in doubt as to any
particular set of facts which might be deemed to present a conflict of interest,
the question should be submitted in writing to senior management or City
counsel, as appropriate.

 Questions Regarding Policy and Reporting of Violations

 Questions concerning this Conflicts Policy or its application in specific
circumstances should be resolved with senior management and the City’s
counsel before any action is taken. It is the responsibility of every Official and
Employee to report to senior management or the City’s counsel any situation or

 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 2 of 6



 Page 7
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY


occurrence that is believed to be contrary to this Conflict-of-Interest Policy.

 Examples of Possible Conflicts

 It is not feasible to describe all the situations that could give rise to a
conflict of interest, nor is it desirable to try to define exact limitations. The
following examples are not intended to be exclusive, but to illustrate various
kinds of situations that would ordinarily raise a question of conflict of
interest.

1. Hearings, Voting and Dispositions. No Official or Employee shall participate in
the hearing or disposition of any matter in which the Official or Employee has an
interest. Any question of whether an Official or Employee has a conflict of interest
sufficient for the Official or Employee to be recused shall be decided by senior
management or City counsel, to whom the question of conflict shall be
submitted by the Official or Employee within three (3) business days after
the Official or Employee first learns of it.

2. Improper Influence. No Official or Employee may grant or deny
permission to a third party to do a thing, or refrain from doing a thing, when
such granting or denying decision is not based on the merits of the facts.

3. Confidential Information.

 a. Disclosure Prohibited. Disclosure of the City’s Confidential
 Information to outsiders or using Confidential Information for personal
 profit or advantage is prohibited.

 b. Definition of Confidential Information. “Confidential
 Information” shall mean any information in the City’s possession or control,
 or that comes into the City’s possession or control during or following the
 term of the Official’s or Employee’s association with the City, of any kind
 and in any form relating to any aspect of the City’s business, projects, plans,
 affairs, products, or services that is not generally known which by its
 disclosure would give the disclosing party a personal or competitive
 advantage. By way of illustration only and not as a limitation “Confidential
 Information” shall include strategies, designs, drawings, sketches, models,
 prototypes, patterns, notes, memoranda, letters, emails, papers, charts, data,
 documentation, code, firmware, formulae, discussions, plans, software,
 programs, algorithms, know-how, branding and/or marketing materials, and
 information developed by the City or developed by third parties for the City
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 3 of 6



 Page 8
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY


 or submitted by them to the City and any documents or things marked
 “CONFIDENTIAL”.

 c. Non-fixed Media. Confidential Information can and often does
 exist in forms not fixed in any medium, such as conversations and
 discussions. To be clear, it is the content of the information, not its form,
 that determines whether the information is Confidential Information.
 When in doubt whether the information is Confidential Information,
 Employees and Officials should treat the information as Confidential
 Information.

 d. Irreparable Harm. Each Official and Employee acknowledges that
 the Confidential Information is the valuable property of the City and is a
 valuable trade secret of the City. Each Employee and Official further
 acknowledges that any disclosure or unauthorized use of the City’s
 Confidential Information will cause irreparable harm and loss to the City, or
 to the party entrusting the Confidential Information to the City, for which
 monetary damages would be inadequate compensation.

 e. Duty of Confidentiality. Each Employee and Official understands
 and agrees that by executing this Conflicts Policy the Employee or Official
 is entering into a special relationship with the City imposing a duty of
 confidentiality upon the Employee and Official.

4. Insider Information. “Insider Information” is a form of Confidential
Information. Insider Information is non-public information which comes to
Employees during the course of their employment or Officials in the course
of their association with the City. Officials and Employees shall not use any
Insider Information, or reveal it to others who may use it, in connection with
business transactions related to the City or contemplated by the City. This
applies not only to non-public information relating to the City, but also to
non-public information relating to third parties such as individuals or
businesses.

5. Contracts; Personal Investments.

 a. General. A conflict could exist through the ownership,
 directly or indirectly, by an Employee or Official with substantial
 financial interest in any outside concern which does or seeks to do
 business with the City, or to furnish it services regarding which the Employee

 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 4 of 6



 Page 9
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY


 or Official has authority to make any decisions or recommendations or
 could have any influence. In Maine, for the purposes of a determination
 of conflict of interest, a “substantial financial interest” constitutes ten percent
 (10%) or more of the outside concern. In any such case, the circumstances
 must be fully disclosed to and approved in writing by the corporate officer
 or City counsel having jurisdiction over the Employee’s or Official’s
 activity in order for the activity not to be prohibited.

 b. Business Opportunities. In addition, no Employee or Official
 should acquire any participating interest, direct or indirect, in any
 entity or venture when it is known, or they know, or they reasonably
 should know, that the City may take or is taking steps to acquire any
 interest in such entity or venture.

 c. Ownership or Participation. For purposes of this Conflicts
 Policy, ownership or participation by the spouse or other family relation
 of an Employee or Official shall be considered as ownership or
 participation by the Employee or Official, absent a clear showing that
 this is not the case, supported by the written approval of senior
 management or City counsel, as appropriate.

6. Employment.

 a. Outside Employment and Consulting. Employment by, or
 rendering consulting services to, any outside concern which does or
 may do business with the City or is a competitor of the City, except
 as a representative of the City or with its written consent, is
 prohibited.

 b. Outside Business Activities. Employees and Officials shall
 not engage in outside business activities or employment
 incompatible with the City’s right to the Employee’s and/or the
 Official’s time and efficient service.

7. Outside Business Directorships. No Employee or Official may serve as
a director of any outside business concern, other than on behalf of the City,
except with the written approval of the City’s corporate officer or counsel
having jurisdiction over the Employee’s or Official’s activity.

 General Undertakings

 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 5 of 6



 Page 10
 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY




 The Employee or Official signing below acknowledges and agrees that they
have undertaken a special duty of confidentiality, care and loyalty to the City as
provided in this Conflicts Policy. The Employee or Official signing below further
agrees that the duties they have undertaken shall remain in full force and effect for
one (1) year following the termination of their employment or other relationship
with the City.

 Employees and Officials who sign this Conflicts Policy understand and agree
that, by signing below, they have read and understood the Policy and have agreed
to its provisions, terms and conditions.



SIGNATURE: ______________________________________


NAME: __________________________________________


TITLE: __________________________________________


DATE: __________________________________________




30-A MRS §2605 et seq.




 DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION ONLY
 PORTLAND
 Conflict-of-Interest Policy
 Page 6 of 6



 Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22