City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-09-23
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Friday, September 23, 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
 Friday
purpose. Proof  of a negative test requires a - September
 printed document,23,  2022
 email, or -text message displayed on a
 PAGE 1 from a test
 phone
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be
submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.


Telecommunication Relay Services


Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.


Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.


What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.


Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.


For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 2
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.


The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.


PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.


The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.


If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 3
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 4
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Friday, September 23, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 14­0236
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR relative to the reappointment of
 Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee Relations Board for the term ending
 September 23, 2027.

 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided)

 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 5
 [Scheduled pursuant to Council Rule 46(b)]
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Friday, September 23, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 14­0236
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR relative to the reappointment of
 Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee Relations Board for the term ending
 September 23, 2027.

 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided)

 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

 [Scheduled pursuant to Council Rule 46(b)]


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 26, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)


(2) 22­1022
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for
 authority to release a Request for Proposals for audit services and select
 auditors to conduct the Annual and Single Audits of the City for Fiscal
 Years 2022­23 through 2024­25.
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 6
 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 26, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)


(2) 22­1022
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for
 authority to release a Request for Proposals for audit services and select
 auditors to conduct the Annual and Single Audits of the City for Fiscal
 Years 2022­23 through 2024­25.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RELEASE the Request for Proposals (RFP), attached to the Joint
 Report from the Controller, City Administrative Officer (CAO), and
 Board of Public Works (Board), attached to the Council file, and to
 make any technical corrections and updates to the RFP for an
 Annual and Single Audit of the City’s finances for Fiscal Years (FY)
 2022­23 through 2024­25 with two one­year renewal options.


 2. EVALUATE the proposals that will be received.


 3. Subsequently report to the Council with recommended actions
 related to the selection of an external auditor, and proposed
 contract, subject to the review of the City Attorney as to form and
 legality.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Controller, CAO, and Board report that there
 is no fiscal impact from approving the recommendations in this report.
 However, an appropriation of funds will be required in the FY 2023­24
 budget to complete the annual audit of FY 2022­23. This amount may be
 similar to the funds included in the FY 2022­23 Adopted Budget for the FY
 2021­22 annual audit ($1,113,689), subject to change based on the
 results of the RFP.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 31, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022)


(3) 21­0874­S2
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering June 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 7
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated June 24,
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022)


(3) 21­0874­S2
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering June 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated June 24,
 2022 and July 25, 2022, attached to the Council file, relative to the
 COVID­19 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund
 Status Report for the weeks covering June 1, 2022 through June 30,
 2022.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(4) 21­0874­S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering July and August 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated July 25,
 2022, August 4, 2022, August 18, 2022, and September 7, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, relative to the COVID­19 Emergency
 Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status Report for the
 weeks covering July 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(5) 22­0770
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility
 of implementing a one­year parking occupancy tax holiday for state
 universities within the City.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Office of Finance report dated August 31, 2022 and
 Motion (Lee – Blumenfield).


 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 8
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.
(5) 22­0770
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility
 of implementing a one­year parking occupancy tax holiday for state
 universities within the City.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Office of Finance report dated August 31, 2022 and
 Motion (Lee – Blumenfield).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(6) 21­0288
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Investment
 Report for October 2021.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Investment Report submitted by the Office of Finance
 dated December 1, 2021, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(7) 22­0906
 CD 12 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the
 identification and transfer of funds for the new capital improvement project
 known as the Balboa Boulevard Bulkhead Project.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Lee –
 Blumenfield):


 1. INSTRUCT The Bureau of Engineering to initiate a new capital
 improvement project to be known as the Balboa Boulevard (12000
 N) Bulkhead Project.


 2. DIRECT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to identify and report
 back on a funding source for the project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Friday Community-Impact
 September  23, 2022
 Statement: - submitted
 None PAGE 9
 N) Bulkhead Project.


 2. DIRECT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to identify and report
 back on a funding source for the project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(8) 22­0256
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Investment
 Reports for April to June of 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Investment Reports submitted by the Office of
 Finance dated July 1, 2022 and July 27, 2022, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(9) 21­1494
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2022
 Annual Statement of Investment Policy.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Office of Finance report dated December 17, 2021,
 attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(10) 22­1002
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a transfer of
 funds within LA Sanitation and Environment (LASAN) funding accounts to
 meet overtime payroll needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer funds within Fund No. 100/82 and
 Fund No. 508/50, Bureau of Sanitation, as follows:
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 10
(10) 22­1002
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a transfer of
 funds within LA Sanitation and Environment (LASAN) funding accounts to
 meet overtime payroll needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer funds within Fund No. 100/82 and
 Fund No. 508/50, Bureau of Sanitation, as follows:


 a. Transfer $4,000,000 from Fund No. 100/82, Account No. 001010
 (SCMO), Salaries General, to Fund No. 100/82, Account No.
 001090 (SCMO), Overtime General.


 b. Transfer $4,130,780 from Fund No. 100/82, Account No. 001010
 (SWRRF), Salaries General, $369,220 from Fund No. 100/82,
 Account No. 00430 (SWRRF), Uniforms, and $2,500,000 from Fund
 No. 508/50, Account No. 50WX82 (SWRRF), Expense and
 Equipment (total of $7,000,000), to Fund No. 100/82, Account No.
 001090 (SWRRF), Overtime general.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the Chief Legislative Analyst nor the City
 Administrative Officer has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(11) 11­1020­S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending
 Subsection (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code in
 regards to the terms “budget advocacy” and “Budget Advocates.”

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Lee –
 Krekorian):


 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, in consultation with the Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE) and the Office of the City
 Clerk, to prepare and present an Ordinance amending Subsection
 (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code to
 replace the existing term of “Budget Advocates” with “budget
 advocacy.”


 2. DIRECT the DONE to promulgate procedures, rules and
 regulations, as well as issue any directives necessary for the
 administration of the Neighborhood Council Fund appropriated for
 Budget Advocacy and the Congress of Neighborhoods in conformity
 with Section 909 of the Los Angeles City Charter, which allows
 certified neighborhood councils to be active and engaged in the
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 11
 Mayor's and City Council's annual City budget process.
 Clerk, to prepare and present an Ordinance amending Subsection
 (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code to
 replace the existing term of “Budget Advocates” with “budget
 advocacy.”


 2. DIRECT the DONE to promulgate procedures, rules and
 regulations, as well as issue any directives necessary for the
 administration of the Neighborhood Council Fund appropriated for
 Budget Advocacy and the Congress of Neighborhoods in conformity
 with Section 909 of the Los Angeles City Charter, which allows
 certified neighborhood councils to be active and engaged in the
 Mayor's and City Council's annual City budget process.


 3. REQUEST that the Mayor’s Office include in its FY 23­24 Budget
 funding to support the Neighborhood Council Budget Advocacy.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Palms Neighborhood Council
 Against:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council
 Reseda Neighborhood Council
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 Mid­City Neighborhood Council
 NoHo Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council
 Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council
 Against Unless Amended:
 Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council
 South Robertson Neighborhood Council
 Tarzana Neighborhood Council




(12) 12­0049­S25
 CD 6 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to extending and amending the
 terms of a loan agreement with the Strathern Park, Limited Partnership, to
 allow for the refinancing of the existing senior loan and to accommodate
 property rehabilitation for the development of affordable housing, for the
 properties located at 11040 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern
 Street in Sun Valley.

 Friday Recommendations for Council
 - September action:
 23, 2022 - PAGE 12
(12) 12­0049­S25
 CD 6 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to extending and amending the
 terms of a loan agreement with the Strathern Park, Limited Partnership, to
 allow for the refinancing of the existing senior loan and to accommodate
 property rehabilitation for the development of affordable housing, for the
 properties located at 11040 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern
 Street in Sun Valley.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare all necessary documents,
 including but not limited to a renewal and modification of a loan
 agreement (and/or amendments and restatements of any necessary
 documents) to preserve and support an affordable housing project
 on the properties located at 11040 West Lorne Street and 11111
 West Strathern Street in Sun Valley, CA 91352 (Assessor Parcel
 Numbers 2314­006­035 and 2314­006­048).


 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing
 Department (LAHD), or designee, to negotiate and execute all
 documents required for the affordable housing project at 11040
 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern Street in Sun Valley,
 CA 91352 (APN(s) 2314­006­035 & 2314­006­048), per the terms
 of the loan agreement or as set forth herein.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no fiscal impact
 to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(13) 12­0968­S6
 CDs 1, 8, and 9 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a First Amendment to
 Contract No. C135171 between the Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD) and New Economics for Women (NEW) to provide
 homeownership services within the University of Southern California (USC)
 Nexus Study Area for the USC Affordable Housing Program.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute a First
 Amendment to Contract No. C­135171 with NEW to extend the contract
 term by one year through November 30, 2023; and, incorporate an
 updated Professional Fee Schedule, new City department name and
 management contacts for the LAHD, and the latest version of the
 Standard Provisions for City contracts, in substantial conformance with the
 draft Amendment attached to the LAHD report, dated August 8, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, subject to review and approval by the City
 Friday Attorney as to form and
 - September compliance
 23, 2022  - with the City’s
 PAGEcontracting
 13
 requirements.
 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute a First
 Amendment to Contract No. C­135171 with NEW to extend the contract
 term by one year through November 30, 2023; and, incorporate an
 updated Professional Fee Schedule, new City department name and
 management contacts for the LAHD, and the latest version of the
 Standard Provisions for City contracts, in substantial conformance with the
 draft Amendment attached to the LAHD report, dated August 8, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, subject to review and approval by the City
 Attorney as to form and compliance with the City’s contracting
 requirements.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no impact to the General Fund. The funding for the original
 Contract with NEW was provided by the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
 The proposed services will be provided during the First Amendment term,
 and will be funded with the available balance currently set aside for this
 Contract.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 10, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)


(14) 15­0087­S8
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the acceptance of
 transportation­related grant awards from the Strategic Growth Council’s
 2021 Round 6 Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC)
 Grant Program.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing
 Department (LAHD), or designee, to execute Standard Agreements
 with the California Department of Housing and Community
 Development (State) for the seven projects awarded in Round 6 of
 the AHSC Grant Program, as detailed in the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) report dated September 9, 2022, attached to the
 Council file, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney
 as to form and legality; and, accept the AHSC, Round 6 grant
 awards totaling $54,782,000.

 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 14
 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing
 Department (LAHD), or designee, to execute Standard Agreements
 with the California Department of Housing and Community
 Development (State) for the seven projects awarded in Round 6 of
 the AHSC Grant Program, as detailed in the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) report dated September 9, 2022, attached to the
 Council file, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney
 as to form and legality; and, accept the AHSC, Round 6 grant
 awards totaling $54,782,000.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Recognize receivables from the State in the amount of
 $54,782,000 to be recorded in the AHSC Grant Fund No.
 60V.


 b. Establish new accounts and appropriate funds within the
 AHSC Grant Fund No. 60V/43 as follows:

 Account Title Amount
 TBD 87th and Western TOD $ 9,621,800
 TBD Grandview TOD 4,630,800
 Jordan Downs Area 2B
 TBD 4,632,600
 ICP
 TBD Locke Village TOD 9,530,000
 Menlo Ave Apartments
 TBD 7,260,000
 ICP
 TBD Umeya Apartments TOD 9,488,600
 TBD Vista Terrace ICP 9,618,200
 Total: $54,782,000



 c. Transfer funds for eligible expenses incurred for work
 completed, or to be completed, for AHSC Rounds 3 through 6,
 from Fund 60V in amounts not to exceed the AHSC
 allocations for each round/project, to the following City
 departments, as follows:

 i. D e p a r t m e n t o f P u b l i c W o r k s ( P W ) B u r e a u o f
 Engineering (BOE) – Fund No. 100/78, Revenue Source
 Code (RSC) No. 5301, Reimbursement From Other
 Funds.


 ii. PW Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL) – Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment Fund No. 347/50, RSC No.
 5301, Reimbursement From Other Funds.


 iii. PW Bureau of Street Services (BSS) – Fund and
 account information to be determined.
Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 15
 Engineering (BOE) – Fund No. 100/78, Revenue Source
 Code (RSC) No. 5301, Reimbursement From Other
 Funds.


 ii. PW Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL) – Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment Fund No. 347/50, RSC No.
 5301, Reimbursement From Other Funds.


 iii. PW Bureau of Street Services (BSS) – Fund and
 account information to be determined.


 iv. Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) –
 Fund No. 100/94, RSC No. 5301, Reimbursement From
 Other Funds.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD to identify the funding required to offset the
 AHSC unfunded costs identified in said CAO report, and revisit the
 City’s application strategy for AHSC, prior to initiating the
 application process for AHSC, Round 7.


 4. AUTHORIZE the General Managers, LAHD, BOE, BSL, BSS, and
 LADOT, or designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any
 technical corrections as necessary to the transactions included in
 said CAO report, including the funds and accounts for AHSC
 reimbursements, to implement the intent of those transactions,
 subject to the approval of the CAO.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is a potential future
 impact on the General Fund if the LAHD is unable to identify the funding
 needed to offset the unfunded AHSC costs in the amount of $14.67 million
 identified in said CAO report. The City must also front­fund the staffing
 and resources needed to implement the grant­funded AHSC Sustainable
 Transit Infrastructure (STI) and Transportation­Related Amenities
 (TRA)improvements for awarded projects. Eligible costs will be
 reimbursed by AHSC Program funds. Staff costs for implementing the STI
 and TRA improvements that are found to be ineligible for AHSC Program
 fund reimbursement may ultimately have a General Fund impact.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 actions comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(15) 22­0600­S90
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles
 Friday Administrative Code to23,
 - September establish
 2022 - a special fund toPAGE
 be known
 16 as the
 ‘Climate Equity Fund”.
 actions comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(15) 22­0600­S90
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code to establish a special fund to be known as the
 ‘Climate Equity Fund”.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated July 1,
 2022, adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative
 Code to establish a special fund to be known as the “Climate Equity
 Fund”.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)


(16) 22­0797
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to addressing illegal dumping on multi­
 jurisdictional locations within the City, and the challenges that delay swift
 responses in addressing sanitation efforts.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian ­
 O’Farrell):


 1. DIRECT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) to report on a strategy to
 coordinate efforts with Los Angeles County and California
 Department of Transportation (CalTrans) when cleaning public
 spaces and when addressing illegal dumping on multi­jurisdictional
 locations in the City. The report should include information related to
 challenges that delay swift responses in addressing sanitation
 efforts, any strategies the BOS may have for overcoming those
 challenges, and recommendations for any system improvements
 that the City can immediately implement.


 Friday - September
 2. INSTRUCT 23, with
 the BOS,  2022the
 - assistance of the City
 PAGE 17
 Administrative
 Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on
 coordinate efforts with Los Angeles County and California
 Department of Transportation (CalTrans) when cleaning public
 spaces and when addressing illegal dumping on multi­jurisdictional
 locations in the City. The report should include information related to
 challenges that delay swift responses in addressing sanitation
 efforts, any strategies the BOS may have for overcoming those
 challenges, and recommendations for any system improvements
 that the City can immediately implement.


 2. INSTRUCT the BOS, with the assistance of the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on
 the feasibility of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with
 Los Angeles County and CalTrans, for the purpose of faster, more
 efficient and more thorough responses to CARE, CARE Plus, and
 illegal dumping locations on multi­jurisdictional properties within the
 City, including funding options available to the City from those
 partners to ensure full cost recovery for services completed outside
 of City jurisdiction.


 3. AUTHORIZE the BOS to make any technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the
 intent of the Motion.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For: Atwater Village Neighborhood Council



(17) 22­0925
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for authority to execute
 Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California
 Association of Sanitation Agencies for Phase 2A and Phase 2B of a
 wastewater flow and load study.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two Members, and
 the Director, Bureau of Sanitation, to execute the proposed Amendment
 No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California Association of
 Sanitation Agencies to extend the term by 25 months to June 20, 2023
 retroactive to May 21, 2021 and increase the total compensation by
 $306,827, from $1.4 million to $1,706,827, subject to approval by City
 Attorney and compliance with the City's contracting requirements.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 Friday - September
 that there is no General23, 2022
 Fund -
 impact. PAGE
 Funding will be 18 by the
 provided
 Sewer Construction and Maintenance Fund.
 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two Members, and
 the Director, Bureau of Sanitation, to execute the proposed Amendment
 No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California Association of
 Sanitation Agencies to extend the term by 25 months to June 20, 2023
 retroactive to May 21, 2021 and increase the total compensation by
 $306,827, from $1.4 million to $1,706,827, subject to approval by City
 Attorney and compliance with the City's contracting requirements.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no General Fund impact. Funding will be provided by the
 Sewer Construction and Maintenance Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: T h e C A O f u r t h e r r e p o r t s t h a t t h e
 recommendation in the report complies with the City’s Financial Policies,
 to the extent that special fund expenditures are limited to the mandates of
 the funding source.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(18) 22­0685
 CD 7 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the agreement for the California Climate
 Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program in the amount of $659,000 for
 the Lopez Canyon Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) to provide training to
 employees and/or contractors performing the specified Project at
 Lopez Canyon in order for these activities to be in compliance with
 the City's Protected Tree Ordinance thereby mitigating impacts to
 protected tree and vegetation species.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Director, BOS, or designee, to negotiate, accept,
 execute, and submit all documents, including, but not limited to,
 agreements, amendments, and payment requests for the Lopez
 Canyon Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project from the California State
 Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Climate
 Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program, subject to the approval
 of the City Attorney as to form.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying Resolution authorizing the City to enter
 into a funding agreement with the State Department of Forestry and
 Fire Protection, and authorizing and designating the Director and
 General Manager, BOS as the representative for the Lopez Canyon
 Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project.


 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 19
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program, subject to the approval
 of the City Attorney as to form.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying Resolution authorizing the City to enter
 into a funding agreement with the State Department of Forestry and
 Fire Protection, and authorizing and designating the Director and
 General Manager, BOS as the representative for the Lopez Canyon
 Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no direct impact to the General Fund. Funding for the project
 is provided by the Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund and the
 proposed grant. The Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund is not a full
 cost recovery fund as such the services provided by this fund are
 subsidized by the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: T h e C A O f u r t h e r r e p o r t s t h a t t h e
 recommendations in this report comply with the City’s Financial Policies in
 one­time grant funding will be utilized for one­time program expenditures.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(19) 10­0322­S1
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 Board Resolution No. 21­9939 which authorizes the proposed Multi­Party
 Agreement with Appellants of the TraPac Environmental Impact Report and
 Harbor Community Benefit Foundation to transfer remaining funds and any
 interest to the Port Community Mitigation Trust Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll, Section 2(f) of the
 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21­9939
 authorizing proposed Multi­Party Agreement No. 21­9844 between
 the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, the Appellants of the
 TraPac Environmental Impact Report and Harbor Community
 Beneift Foundation to transfer at least $270,000 and any interest
 generated to the Harbor Community Benefit Foundation for
 administration.

 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 20
 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21­9939
 authorizing proposed Multi­Party Agreement No. 21­9844 between
 the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, the Appellants of the
 TraPac Environmental Impact Report and Harbor Community
 Beneift Foundation to transfer at least $270,000 and any interest
 generated to the Harbor Community Benefit Foundation for
 administration.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 4, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(20) 16­0144­S1
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842 with Harbor
 Community Benefit Foundation (HCBF) and China Shipping Petitioners
 naming HCBF as administrator of the Air Quality Mitigation Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll Section 2(f) of the
 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21­9929
 authorizing the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842
 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, China
 Shipping Petitioners and HCBF.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 21
 authorizing the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842
 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, China
 Shipping Petitioners and HCBF.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 4, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(21) 15­1546­S1
 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897 with The Private Suite LAX,
 LLC to extend the term and implement a payment plan for rent in arrears,
 with interest, covering a remote passenger terminal located at 6871 West
 Imperial Highway within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
 Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897 with The
 Private Suite LAX, LLC to extend the term by five years and
 implement a payment plan for rent in arrears, with interest, covering
 a remote passenger terminal located at 6871 West Imperial
 Highway within LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 7, 2022, by Resolution No.
 27524, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World
 Airports, to execute the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897
 with The Private Suite LAX, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund
 impact.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 22
 27524, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World
 Airports, to execute the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897
 with The Private Suite LAX, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund
 impact.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 3, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 30, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(22) 22­0995
 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba Kenton Koszdin Law Offices located at
 16461 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91406.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
 Article lll, Classes 1(18)(c) and 1(1) of the Los Angeles City CEQA
 Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the 63­month Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba Kenton
 Koszdin Law Offices, covering office space in the Los Angeles
 World Airports­owned Aviation Plaza, located at 16461 Sherman
 Way, Van Nuys.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27542, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer of Los Angeles
 World Airports to execute said Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba
 Kenton Koszdin Law Offices.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Friday - TIME
 September 23,FILE
 LIMIT 2022­ -SEPTEMBER 28, 2022
 PAGE 23
 World Airports to execute said Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba
 Kenton Koszdin Law Offices.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(23) 14­0117­S2
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating
 vacation proceedings for Exposition Boulevard Southerly Roadway and
 Bronson Avenue Vacation District (VAC­E1401414).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated September 1, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to
 vacate Exposition Boulevard Southerly Roadway and Bronson
 Avenue Vacation District, as shown on Exhibit A of said City
 Engineer report, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code,
 Division 9, Part 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements
 Vacation Law.


 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 regarding the feasibility of this vacation request.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $47,080
 was paid by the petitioner for the investigation of this request pursuant to
 Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any deficit
 fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of
 the petitioner.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(24) 20­0289
 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY
 ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO VACATE relative to vacating an east
 west alley southerly of Washington Boulevard between Claudina Avenue
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 24
 and Vineyard Avenue ­VAC­E1401379 (Vacation).
 fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of
 the petitioner.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(24) 20­0289
 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY
 ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO VACATE relative to vacating an east
 west alley southerly of Washington Boulevard between Claudina Avenue
 and Vineyard Avenue ­VAC­E1401379 (Vacation).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of September 22, 2020, that the
 Vacation, pursuant to the City of Los Angeles Environmental
 Guidelines, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(3) of the City of Los Angeles
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of September 22, 2020, that the
 Vacation is in substantial conformance with the General Plan
 pursuant to Section 556 of the Los Angeles City Charter.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION TO VACATE No. 22­
 1401379 for the Vacation.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(25) 22­0949
 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating
 vacation proceedings for a portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between
 Waring Avenue and Melrose Avenue (VAC­E1401427).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated August 15, 2022, attached
 to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to vacate a
 portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between Waring Avenue and
 Melrose Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A of said City Engineer report,
 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part
 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law.

 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 25
 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated August 15, 2022, attached
 to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to vacate a
 portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between Waring Avenue and
 Melrose Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A of said City Engineer report,
 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part
 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law.


 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 regarding the feasibility of this vacation request.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $14,980
 was paid by the petitioner for the investigation of this request pursuant to
 Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any deficit
 fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of
 the petitioner.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(26) 21­0010­S22
 MOTION (BUSCAINO – BLUMENFIELD) relative to an offer of reward for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of
 the person or persons responsible for the death of Monica Molina on May
 2, 2021.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PROVIDE an offer of reward in the amount of $50,000 for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and
 conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of
 Monica Molina on May 2, 2021.


 2. FIND that the subject reward following findings pursuant to Division
 19, Chapter 12, Article 1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 effective this reward.



(27) 22­0010­S20
 MOTION (HARRIS­DAWSON ­ BONIN) relative to an offer of reward for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of
 person(s) responsible for the attempted murder of Eduin Lopez on July 17,
 2022.
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 26
 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 effective this reward.



 (27) 22­0010­S20
 MOTION (HARRIS­DAWSON ­ BONIN) relative to an offer of reward for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of
 person(s) responsible for the attempted murder of Eduin Lopez on July 17,
 2022.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PROVIDE an offer of reward in the amount of $50,000 for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and
 conviction of the person(s) responsible for the injury of Eduin Lopez.


 2. FIND that the subject reward complies with the provisions of
 Chapter 12, Article 1, Division 19, of the Los Angeles Administrative
 Code.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 advertisements to effectuate this reward.


 4. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the reward notice in the Our
 Weekly, Los Angeles Sentinel, and LA Watts Times, in addition to
 the regular publications used by the City Clerk for reward notices, to
 ensure adequate community notice.




Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

 Friday
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5- ­ If a September 23, is
 Council action  2022 - to judicial challenge PAGE
 subject pursuant27 to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000).




 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 28

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Friday, September 23, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)

 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)

Roll Call
Members Present: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Lee, O'Farrell,
Price Jr., Raman (10); Absent: Cedillo, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Martinez, Rodriguez
(5)

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED
Multiple Agenda Item Comment
Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council Items for which Public
Hearings Have Been Held


(1) 14-0236



 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR relative to the reappointment of
 Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee Relations Board for the term ending
 September 23, 2027.

 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided)

 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

 [Scheduled pursuant to Council Rule 46(b)]


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 26, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 1
 Adopted Item
 [Scheduled pursuant to Council Rule 46(b)]


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 26, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)

 Adopted Item - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)


(2) 22-1022
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for
 authority to release a Request for Proposals for audit services and select
 auditors to conduct the Annual and Single Audits of the City for Fiscal
 Years 2022­23 through 2024­25.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RELEASE the Request for Proposals (RFP), attached to the Joint
 Report from the Controller, City Administrative Officer (CAO), and
 Board of Public Works (Board), attached to the Council file, and to
 make any technical corrections and updates to the RFP for an
 Annual and Single Audit of the City’s finances for Fiscal Years (FY)
 2022­23 through 2024­25 with two one­year renewal options.


 2. EVALUATE the proposals that will be received.


 3. Subsequently report to the Council with recommended actions
 related to the selection of an external auditor, and proposed
 contract, subject to the review of the City Attorney as to form and
 legality.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Controller, CAO, and Board report that there
 is no fiscal impact from approving the recommendations in this report.
 However, an appropriation of funds will be required in the FY 2023­24
 budget to complete the annual audit of FY 2022­23. This amount may be
 similar to the funds included in the FY 2022­23 Adopted Budget for the FY
 2021­22 annual audit ($1,113,689), subject to change based on the
 results of the RFP.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 31, 2022
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 2
 is no fiscal impact from approving the recommendations in this report.
 However, an appropriation of funds will be required in the FY 2023­24
 budget to complete the annual audit of FY 2022­23. This amount may be
 similar to the funds included in the FY 2022­23 Adopted Budget for the FY
 2021­22 annual audit ($1,113,689), subject to change based on the
 results of the RFP.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 31, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(3) 21-0874-S2
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering June 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated June 24,
 2022 and July 25, 2022, attached to the Council file, relative to the
 COVID­19 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund
 Status Report for the weeks covering June 1, 2022 through June 30,
 2022.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(4) 21-0874-S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering July and August 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated July 25,
 Friday 2022, August  4, 2022,23,
 - September  August
 2022 -18, 2022, and September
 PAGE 37, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, relative to the COVID­19 Emergency
 Rodriguez (3)

(4) 21-0874-S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the COVID­19
 Emergency Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status
 Reports covering July and August 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the City Administrative Officer reports dated July 25,
 2022, August 4, 2022, August 18, 2022, and September 7, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, relative to the COVID­19 Emergency
 Response Account – General City Purposes Fund Status Report for the
 weeks covering July 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(5) 22-0770
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility
 of implementing a one­year parking occupancy tax holiday for state
 universities within the City.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Office of Finance report dated August 31, 2022 and
 Motion (Lee – Blumenfield).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(6) 21-0288
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Investment
 Report for October 2021.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 4
 NOTE and FILE the Investment Report submitted by the Office of Finance
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(6) 21-0288
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Investment
 Report for October 2021.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Investment Report submitted by the Office of Finance
 dated December 1, 2021, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(7) 22-0906
 CD 12 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the
 identification and transfer of funds for the new capital improvement project
 known as the Balboa Boulevard Bulkhead Project.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Lee –
 Blumenfield):


 1. INSTRUCT The Bureau of Engineering to initiate a new capital
 improvement project to be known as the Balboa Boulevard (12000
 N) Bulkhead Project.


 2. DIRECT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to identify and report
 back on a funding source for the project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 5
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(8) 22-0256
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Investment
 Reports for April to June of 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Investment Reports submitted by the Office of
 Finance dated July 1, 2022 and July 27, 2022, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(9) 21-1494
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2022
 Annual Statement of Investment Policy.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 NOTE and FILE the Office of Finance report dated December 17, 2021,
 attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(10) 22-1002
 Friday - September
 BUDGET AND  FINANCE23, 2022 -
 COMMITTEE PAGE
 REPORT relative to a 6transfer of
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(10) 22-1002
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a transfer of
 funds within LA Sanitation and Environment (LASAN) funding accounts to
 meet overtime payroll needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer funds within Fund No. 100/82 and
 Fund No. 508/50, Bureau of Sanitation, as follows:


 a. Transfer $4,000,000 from Fund No. 100/82, Account No. 001010
 (SCMO), Salaries General, to Fund No. 100/82, Account No.
 001090 (SCMO), Overtime General.


 b. Transfer $4,130,780 from Fund No. 100/82, Account No. 001010
 (SWRRF), Salaries General, $369,220 from Fund No. 100/82,
 Account No. 00430 (SWRRF), Uniforms, and $2,500,000 from Fund
 No. 508/50, Account No. 50WX82 (SWRRF), Expense and
 Equipment (total of $7,000,000), to Fund No. 100/82, Account No.
 001090 (SWRRF), Overtime general.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the Chief Legislative Analyst nor the City
 Administrative Officer has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(11) 11-1020-S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending
 Subsection (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code in
 regards to the terms “budget advocacy” and “Budget Advocates.”

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Lee –
 Krekorian):
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 7
 Rodriguez (3)

(11) 11-1020-S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending
 Subsection (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code in
 regards to the terms “budget advocacy” and “Budget Advocates.”

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Lee –
 Krekorian):


 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, in consultation with the Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE) and the Office of the City
 Clerk, to prepare and present an Ordinance amending Subsection
 (b) of Section 5.517 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code to
 replace the existing term of “Budget Advocates” with “budget
 advocacy.”


 2. DIRECT the DONE to promulgate procedures, rules and
 regulations, as well as issue any directives necessary for the
 administration of the Neighborhood Council Fund appropriated for
 Budget Advocacy and the Congress of Neighborhoods in conformity
 with Section 909 of the Los Angeles City Charter, which allows
 certified neighborhood councils to be active and engaged in the
 Mayor's and City Council's annual City budget process.


 3. REQUEST that the Mayor’s Office include in its FY 23­24 Budget
 funding to support the Neighborhood Council Budget Advocacy.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Palms Neighborhood Council
 Against:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 Greater Wilshire Neighborhood Council
 Reseda Neighborhood Council
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 Mid­City Neighborhood Council
 NoHo Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council
 Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council
 Against Unless Amended:
 Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council
 South Robertson Neighborhood Council
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 8
 Tarzana Neighborhood Council
 Reseda Neighborhood Council
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 Mid­City Neighborhood Council
 NoHo Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council
 Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council
 Against Unless Amended:
 Lake Balboa Neighborhood Council
 South Robertson Neighborhood Council
 Tarzana Neighborhood Council



 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(12) 12-0049-S25
 CD 6 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to extending and amending the
 terms of a loan agreement with the Strathern Park, Limited Partnership, to
 allow for the refinancing of the existing senior loan and to accommodate
 property rehabilitation for the development of affordable housing, for the
 properties located at 11040 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern
 Street in Sun Valley.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare all necessary documents,
 including but not limited to a renewal and modification of a loan
 agreement (and/or amendments and restatements of any necessary
 documents) to preserve and support an affordable housing project
 on the properties located at 11040 West Lorne Street and 11111
 West Strathern Street in Sun Valley, CA 91352 (Assessor Parcel
 Numbers 2314­006­035 and 2314­006­048).


 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing
 Department (LAHD), or designee, to negotiate and execute all
 documents required for the affordable housing project at 11040
 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern Street in Sun Valley,
 CA 91352 (APN(s) 2314­006­035 & 2314­006­048), per the terms
 of the loan agreement or as set forth herein.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no fiscal impact
 to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Adopted Item
 West Lorne Street and 11111 West Strathern Street in Sun Valley,
 CA 91352 (APN(s) 2314­006­035 & 2314­006­048), per the terms
 of the loan agreement or as set forth herein.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no fiscal impact
 to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(13) 12-0968-S6
 CDs 1, 8, and 9 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a First Amendment to
 Contract No. C135171 between the Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD) and New Economics for Women (NEW) to provide
 homeownership services within the University of Southern California (USC)
 Nexus Study Area for the USC Affordable Housing Program.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute a First
 Amendment to Contract No. C­135171 with NEW to extend the contract
 term by one year through November 30, 2023; and, incorporate an
 updated Professional Fee Schedule, new City department name and
 management contacts for the LAHD, and the latest version of the
 Standard Provisions for City contracts, in substantial conformance with the
 draft Amendment attached to the LAHD report, dated August 8, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, subject to review and approval by the City
 Attorney as to form and compliance with the City’s contracting
 requirements.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no impact to the General Fund. The funding for the original
 Contract with NEW was provided by the Affordable Housing Trust Fund.
 The proposed services will be provided during the First Amendment term,
 and will be funded with the available balance currently set aside for this
 Contract.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 10, 2022

 Friday - September
 (LAST  DAY FOR 23, 2022 - ACTION ­ OCTOBER
 COUNCIL PAGE  10
 7, 2022)
 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 10, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(14) 15-0087-S8
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the acceptance of
 transportation­related grant awards from the Strategic Growth Council’s
 2021 Round 6 Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC)
 Grant Program.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing
 Department (LAHD), or designee, to execute Standard Agreements
 with the California Department of Housing and Community
 Development (State) for the seven projects awarded in Round 6 of
 the AHSC Grant Program, as detailed in the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) report dated September 9, 2022, attached to the
 Council file, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney
 as to form and legality; and, accept the AHSC, Round 6 grant
 awards totaling $54,782,000.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Recognize receivables from the State in the amount of
 $54,782,000 to be recorded in the AHSC Grant Fund No.
 60V.


 b. Establish new accounts and appropriate funds within the
 AHSC Grant Fund No. 60V/43 as follows:

 Account Title Amount
 TBD 87th and Western TOD $ 9,621,800
 TBD Grandview TOD 4,630,800
 Jordan Downs Area 2B
 TBD 4,632,600
 Friday ICP23, 2022 -
 - September PAGE 11
 TBD Locke Village TOD 9,530,000
 b. Establish new accounts and appropriate funds within the
 AHSC Grant Fund No. 60V/43 as follows:

 Account Title Amount
 TBD 87th and Western TOD $ 9,621,800
 TBD Grandview TOD 4,630,800
 Jordan Downs Area 2B
 TBD 4,632,600
 ICP
 TBD Locke Village TOD 9,530,000
 Menlo Ave Apartments
 TBD 7,260,000
 ICP
 TBD Umeya Apartments TOD 9,488,600
 TBD Vista Terrace ICP 9,618,200
 Total: $54,782,000



 c. Transfer funds for eligible expenses incurred for work
 completed, or to be completed, for AHSC Rounds 3 through 6,
 from Fund 60V in amounts not to exceed the AHSC
 allocations for each round/project, to the following City
 departments, as follows:

 i. D e p a r t m e n t o f P u b l i c W o r k s ( P W ) B u r e a u o f
 Engineering (BOE) – Fund No. 100/78, Revenue Source
 Code (RSC) No. 5301, Reimbursement From Other
 Funds.


 ii. PW Bureau of Street Lighting (BSL) – Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment Fund No. 347/50, RSC No.
 5301, Reimbursement From Other Funds.


 iii. PW Bureau of Street Services (BSS) – Fund and
 account information to be determined.


 iv. Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) –
 Fund No. 100/94, RSC No. 5301, Reimbursement From
 Other Funds.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD to identify the funding required to offset the
 AHSC unfunded costs identified in said CAO report, and revisit the
 City’s application strategy for AHSC, prior to initiating the
 application process for AHSC, Round 7.


 4. AUTHORIZE the General Managers, LAHD, BOE, BSL, BSS, and
 LADOT, or designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any
 technical corrections as necessary to the transactions included in
Friday said -CAO
 September
 report, 23, 2022 - the funds and accounts
 including PAGE 12  for AHSC
 reimbursements, to implement the intent of those transactions,
 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD to identify the funding required to offset the
 AHSC unfunded costs identified in said CAO report, and revisit the
 City’s application strategy for AHSC, prior to initiating the
 application process for AHSC, Round 7.


 4. AUTHORIZE the General Managers, LAHD, BOE, BSL, BSS, and
 LADOT, or designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any
 technical corrections as necessary to the transactions included in
 said CAO report, including the funds and accounts for AHSC
 reimbursements, to implement the intent of those transactions,
 subject to the approval of the CAO.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is a potential future
 impact on the General Fund if the LAHD is unable to identify the funding
 needed to offset the unfunded AHSC costs in the amount of $14.67 million
 identified in said CAO report. The City must also front­fund the staffing
 and resources needed to implement the grant­funded AHSC Sustainable
 Transit Infrastructure (STI) and Transportation­Related Amenities
 (TRA)improvements for awarded projects. Eligible costs will be
 reimbursed by AHSC Program funds. Staff costs for implementing the STI
 and TRA improvements that are found to be ineligible for AHSC Program
 fund reimbursement may ultimately have a General Fund impact.


 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 actions comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(15) 22-0600-S90
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code to establish a special fund to be known as the
 ‘Climate Equity Fund”.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated July 1,
 2022, adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative
 Code to establish a special fund to be known as the “Climate Equity
 Fund”.

 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 13
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 Administrative Code to establish a special fund to be known as the
 ‘Climate Equity Fund”.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE,*dated July 1,
 2022, adding Chapter 193 to Division 5 of the Los Angeles Administrative
 Code to establish a special fund to be known as the “Climate Equity
 Fund”.

 *JOURNAL CORRECTION

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(16) 22-0797
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to addressing illegal dumping on multi­
 jurisdictional locations within the City, and the challenges that delay swift
 responses in addressing sanitation efforts.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian ­
 O’Farrell):


 1. DIRECT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) to report on a strategy to
 coordinate efforts with Los Angeles County and California
 Department of Transportation (CalTrans) when cleaning public
 spaces and when addressing illegal dumping on multi­jurisdictional
 locations in the City. The report should include information related to
 challenges that delay swift responses in addressing sanitation
 efforts, any strategies the BOS may have for overcoming those
 challenges, and recommendations for any system improvements
 that the City can immediately implement.


 2. INSTRUCT the BOS, with the assistance of the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on
 the feasibility of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with
 Los Angeles County and CalTrans, for the purpose of faster, more
 efficient and more thorough responses to CARE, CARE Plus, and
 Friday illegal- dumping
 Septemberlocations
 23, 2022on -multi­jurisdictional properties
 PAGE 14within the
 City, including funding options available to the City from those
 challenges that delay swift responses in addressing sanitation
 efforts, any strategies the BOS may have for overcoming those
 challenges, and recommendations for any system improvements
 that the City can immediately implement.


 2. INSTRUCT the BOS, with the assistance of the City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on
 the feasibility of entering into a Memorandum of Understanding with
 Los Angeles County and CalTrans, for the purpose of faster, more
 efficient and more thorough responses to CARE, CARE Plus, and
 illegal dumping locations on multi­jurisdictional properties within the
 City, including funding options available to the City from those
 partners to ensure full cost recovery for services completed outside
 of City jurisdiction.


 3. AUTHORIZE the BOS to make any technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the
 intent of the Motion.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For: Atwater Village Neighborhood Council


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(17) 22-0925
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for authority to execute
 Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California
 Association of Sanitation Agencies for Phase 2A and Phase 2B of a
 wastewater flow and load study.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two Members, and
 the Director, Bureau of Sanitation, to execute the proposed Amendment
 No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California Association of
 Sanitation Agencies to extend the term by 25 months to June 20, 2023
 retroactive to May 21, 2021 and increase the total compensation by
 $306,827, from $1.4 million to $1,706,827, subject to approval by City
 Attorney and compliance with the City's contracting requirements.



 Friday Fiscal Impact  Statement:23,
 - September The  City- Administrative Officer
 2022 PAGE(CAO)
 15 reports
 that there is no General Fund impact. Funding will be provided by the
 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two Members, and
 the Director, Bureau of Sanitation, to execute the proposed Amendment
 No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement with the California Association of
 Sanitation Agencies to extend the term by 25 months to June 20, 2023
 retroactive to May 21, 2021 and increase the total compensation by
 $306,827, from $1.4 million to $1,706,827, subject to approval by City
 Attorney and compliance with the City's contracting requirements.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no General Fund impact. Funding will be provided by the
 Sewer Construction and Maintenance Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: T h e C A O f u r t h e r r e p o r t s t h a t t h e
 recommendation in the report complies with the City’s Financial Policies,
 to the extent that special fund expenditures are limited to the mandates of
 the funding source.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(18) 22-0685
 CD 7 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT *and RESOLUTION relative to the agreement for
 the California Climate Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program in the
 amount of $659,000 for the Lopez Canyon Hazardous Fuel Reduction
 Project.
 Recommendations for Council action,*SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:


 1. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS) to provide training to
 employees and/or contractors performing the specified Project at
 Lopez Canyon in order for these activities to be in compliance with
 the City's Protected Tree Ordinance thereby mitigating impacts to
 protected tree and vegetation species.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Director, BOS, or designee, to negotiate, accept,
 execute, and submit all documents, including, but not limited to,
 agreements, amendments, and payment requests for the Lopez
 Canyon Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project from the California State
 Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Climate
 Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program, subject to the approval
 of the City Attorney as to form.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying Resolution authorizing the City to enter
 into a funding agreement with the State Department of Forestry and
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 16
 Fire Protection, and authorizing and designating the Director and
 2. AUTHORIZE the Director, BOS, or designee, to negotiate, accept,
 execute, and submit all documents, including, but not limited to,
 agreements, amendments, and payment requests for the Lopez
 Canyon Hazardous Fuel Reduction Project from the California State
 Department of Forestry and Fire Protection California Climate
 Investments Fire Prevention Grants Program, subject to the approval
 of the City Attorney as to form.

 *RESOLUTION
 3. ADOPT the accompanying Resolution authorizing the City to enter
 into a funding agreement with the State Department of Forestry and
 Fire Protection, and authorizing and designating the Director and
 General Manager, BOS as the representative for the Lopez Canyon
 Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project.
 *JOURNAL CORRECTIONS

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no direct impact to the General Fund. Funding for the project
 is provided by the Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund and the
 proposed grant. The Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund is not a full
 cost recovery fund as such the services provided by this fund are
 subsidized by the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: T h e C A O f u r t h e r r e p o r t s t h a t t h e
 recommendations in this report comply with the City’s Financial Policies in
 one­time grant funding will be utilized for one­time program expenditures.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(19) 10-0322-S1
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 Board Resolution No. 21­9939 which authorizes the proposed Multi­Party
 Agreement with Appellants of the TraPac Environmental Impact Report and
 Harbor Community Benefit Foundation to transfer remaining funds and any
 interest to the Port Community Mitigation Trust Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll, Section 2(f) of the
 Friday Los -  September
 Angeles City 23,
 CEQA 2022 -
 Guidelines. PAGE 17
 Agreement with Appellants of the TraPac Environmental Impact Report and
 Harbor Community Benefit Foundation to transfer remaining funds and any
 interest to the Port Community Mitigation Trust Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll, Section 2(f) of the
 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21­9939
 authorizing proposed Multi­Party Agreement No. 21­9844 between
 the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, the Appellants of the
 TraPac Environmental Impact Report and Harbor Community
 Beneift Foundation to transfer at least $270,000 and any interest
 generated to the Harbor Community Benefit Foundation for
 administration.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 4, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(20) 16-0144-S1
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842 with Harbor
 Community Benefit Foundation (HCBF) and China Shipping Petitioners
 naming HCBF as administrator of the Air Quality Mitigation Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 Friday administratively
 - Septemberexempt
 23, 2022from
 - the requirementsPAGEof the18
 California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll Section 2(f) of the
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842 with Harbor
 Community Benefit Foundation (HCBF) and China Shipping Petitioners
 naming HCBF as administrator of the Air Quality Mitigation Fund.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article ll Section 2(f) of the
 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21­9929
 authorizing the proposed Memorandum of Agreement No. 21­9842
 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, China
 Shipping Petitioners and HCBF.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 4, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(21) 15-1546-S1
 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897 with The Private Suite LAX,
 LLC to extend the term and implement a payment plan for rent in arrears,
 with interest, covering a remote passenger terminal located at 6871 West
 Imperial Highway within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
 Friday Article- lll,
 September 23, 2022
 Class 1 (18)(c) - Los Angeles City CEQA
 of the PAGE Guidelines.
 19
 the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897 with The Private Suite LAX,
 LLC to extend the term and implement a payment plan for rent in arrears,
 with interest, covering a remote passenger terminal located at 6871 West
 Imperial Highway within Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
 Article lll, Class 1 (18)(c) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897 with The
 Private Suite LAX, LLC to extend the term by five years and
 implement a payment plan for rent in arrears, with interest, covering
 a remote passenger terminal located at 6871 West Imperial
 Highway within LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 7, 2022, by Resolution No.
 27524, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles World
 Airports, to execute the Second Amendment to Lease LAA­8897
 with The Private Suite LAX, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no General Fund
 impact.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 3, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 30, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(22) 22-0995
 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba Kenton Koszdin Law Offices located at
 16461 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91406.

 Recommendations for Council action:
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 20
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(22) 22-0995
 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba Kenton Koszdin Law Offices located at
 16461 Sherman Way, Van Nuys, CA 91406.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that the action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
 Article lll, Classes 1(18)(c) and 1(1) of the Los Angeles City CEQA
 Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the 63­month Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba Kenton
 Koszdin Law Offices, covering office space in the Los Angeles
 World Airports­owned Aviation Plaza, located at 16461 Sherman
 Way, Van Nuys.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on July 21, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27542, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer of Los Angeles
 World Airports to execute said Lease with Kenton Koszdin dba
 Kenton Koszdin Law Offices.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ SEPTEMBER 28, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(23) 14-0117-S2
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating
 vacation proceedings for Exposition Boulevard Southerly Roadway and
 Friday Bronson Avenue  Vacation23,
 - September District
 2022(VAC­E1401414).
 - PAGE 21
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(23) 14-0117-S2
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating
 vacation proceedings for Exposition Boulevard Southerly Roadway and
 Bronson Avenue Vacation District (VAC­E1401414).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated September 1, 2022,
 attached to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to
 vacate Exposition Boulevard Southerly Roadway and Bronson
 Avenue Vacation District, as shown on Exhibit A of said City
 Engineer report, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code,
 Division 9, Part 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements
 Vacation Law.


 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 regarding the feasibility of this vacation request.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $47,080
 was paid by the petitioner for the investigation of this request pursuant to
 Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any deficit
 fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of
 the petitioner.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(24) 20-0289
 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY
 ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO VACATE relative to vacating an east
 west alley southerly of Washington Boulevard between Claudina Avenue
 and Vineyard Avenue ­VAC­E1401379 (Vacation).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of September 22, 2020, that the
 Vacation, pursuant to the City of Los Angeles Environmental
 Guidelines, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 22
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(3) of the City of Los Angeles
 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY
 ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO VACATE relative to vacating an east
 west alley southerly of Washington Boulevard between Claudina Avenue
 and Vineyard Avenue ­VAC­E1401379 (Vacation).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of September 22, 2020, that the
 Vacation, pursuant to the City of Los Angeles Environmental
 Guidelines, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(3) of the City of Los Angeles
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of September 22, 2020, that the
 Vacation is in substantial conformance with the General Plan
 pursuant to Section 556 of the Los Angeles City Charter.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION TO VACATE No. 22­
 1401379 for the Vacation.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(25) 22-0949
 CD 13 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to initiating
 vacation proceedings for a portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between
 Waring Avenue and Melrose Avenue (VAC­E1401427).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated August 15, 2022, attached
 to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to vacate a
 portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between Waring Avenue and
 Melrose Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A of said City Engineer report,
 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part
 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law.


 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 regarding the feasibility of this vacation request.
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 23
 1. ADOPT the City Engineer report dated August 15, 2022, attached
 to the Council file, to initiate the vacation proceedings to vacate a
 portion of Cahuenga Boulevard between Waring Avenue and
 Melrose Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A of said City Engineer report,
 pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code, Division 9, Part
 3, Public Streets, Highways and Service Easements Vacation Law.


 2. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to investigate and report
 regarding the feasibility of this vacation request.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $14,980
 was paid by the petitioner for the investigation of this request pursuant to
 Section 7.42 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC). Any deficit
 fee to recover the cost pursuant to LAAC Section 7.44 will be required of
 the petitioner.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(26) 21-0010-S22
 MOTION (BUSCAINO – BLUMENFIELD) relative to an offer of reward for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of
 the person or persons responsible for the death of Monica Molina on May
 2, 2021.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PROVIDE an offer of reward in the amount of $50,000 for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and
 conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of
 Monica Molina on May 2, 2021.


 2. FIND that the subject reward following findings pursuant to Division
 19, Chapter 12, Article 1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 effective this reward.


 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Friday
 Lee, - (12);
 September
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman 23,(0);
 Nays: Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 2022 - PAGE 24
 Rodriguez (3)
 2. FIND that the subject reward following findings pursuant to Division
 19, Chapter 12, Article 1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 effective this reward.


 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)

(27) 22-0010-S20
 MOTION (HARRIS­DAWSON ­ BONIN) relative to an offer of reward for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of
 person(s) responsible for the attempted murder of Eduin Lopez on July 17,
 2022.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PROVIDE an offer of reward in the amount of $50,000 for
 information leading to the identification, apprehension, and
 conviction of the person(s) responsible for the injury of Eduin Lopez.


 2. FIND that the subject reward complies with the provisions of
 Chapter 12, Article 1, Division 19, of the Los Angeles Administrative
 Code.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the required notices and/or
 advertisements to effectuate this reward.


 4. DIRECT the City Clerk to publish the reward notice in the Our
 Weekly, Los Angeles Sentinel, and LA Watts Times, in addition to
 the regular publications used by the City Clerk for reward notices, to
 ensure adequate community notice.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Lee, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Krekorian, Martinez,
 Rodriguez (3)



Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral
 Friday - September 23, 2022 - PAGE 25
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Price De Leon Dr. Seleshi Bekele
 Awulachew
Cedillo De Leon Richard Aguilar
Cedillo De Leon Arturo Vargas
Cedillo for Martinez Price Univision
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Buscaino All Councilmembers Maury Wills
Raman All Councilmembers Marsha Hunt
 TO CITY CLERK FOR PlACEl1¥.:NT ON NEXT
 REGULAR COUNCILAGErmP, TO£~ PiJSTED
 l#51
 MOTi _ __

Luna Vista L.P. (Sponsor), a California limited partnership, has requested that the City of Los
Angeles (City) through the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) issue Multifamily Housing
Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $32,997,000 to finance the acquisition, rehabilitation,
and development of a 73-unit multifamily housing project known as Luna Vista (Project) located
at 8767 N. Parthenia Place in Council District 6. The Project will provide 71 units of affordable
housing, and 2 manager units.

In accordance with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) and as part of
the bond issuance process, LAHD conducted the required public hearing on April 21, 2022. Notice
of the public hearing was published on April 14, 2022. LAHD is required to provide proof to the
California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CD LAC) that a TEFRA hearing has been conducted
as part of the application process. The Sponsor has pledged to comply with all City and LAHD
bond policies related to the work described in this motion, including but not limited to payment of
prevailing wages for labor and project monitoring with the LAHD.

The City is a conduit issuer and is required by federal law to review and approve all projects within
its jurisdiction and conduct a public hearing. The bond debt is payable solely from revenues or other
funds provided by the Sponsor. The City does not incur liability for repayment of the bonds. To
allow the bonds to be issued in accordance with CDLAC requirements, the Council should approve
the minutes of the hearing and adopt the required Resolution (attached).

I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council consider the attached results of the TEFRA public
hearing held on April 21, 2022 for Luna Vista and adopt the attached TEFRA Resolution approving
the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $32,997,000 for the acquisition, rehabilitation, and
development of a 73-unit multifamily housing project located 8767 N. Parthenia Place in Council
District 6.



 PRESENTED BY: ?l-1 "\..::""£'. ~
 NURY MARTINEZ •
 l d-1r--1,,,,JUJJ,)J1'!1f;..r,-IPil'IW-"f~
 Councilwoman, 6th District




 SECONDED BY:




so




 SEP 2 3 2022

!"&
 RESOLUTION

 CITY OF LOS ANGELES


 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 147(t) OF THE
 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OR NOTES BY
 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES TO FINANCE THE ACQUISITION,
 REHABILITATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A MULTIFAMILY
 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT LOCATED WITHJN THE ClTY OF
 LOS ANGELES.

 WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles (the "City") is authorized, pursuant to Section 248, as
amended, of the City Charter of the City and Article 6.3 of Chapter 1 of Division 11 of the Los Angeles
Administrative Code, as amended (collectively, the "Law"), and in accordance with Chapter 7 ofPart 5 of
Division 31 (commencing with Section 52075) of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the
"Act"), to issue its revenue bonds or notes for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition,
construction, rehabilitation and equipping of multifamily rental housing for persons and families oflow or
moderate income; and

 WHEREAS, the City intends to issue for federal income tax purposes certain bonds or notes (the
"Bonds") the proceeds of which will be used to finance the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and
equipping of a multifamily rental housing project described in paragraph 6 hereof (the "Project"); and

 WHEREAS, the Project is located wholly within the City; and

 WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City authorize the financing
of the Project, and it is within the powers of the City to provide for such financing and the issuance of the
Bonds; and

 WHEREAS, the interest on the Bonds may qualify for a federal tax exemption under
Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), only if the Bonds are approved in
accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code; and

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Code, Bonds are required to be approved, following a public hearing,
by an elected representative of the issuer of the Bonds (or of the governmental unit on behalf of which the
Bonds are issued) and an elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area
in which the Project is located; and

 WHEREAS, this City Council is the elected legislative body of the City and is the applicable
elected representative required to approve the issuance of the Bonds within the meaning of Section 147(f)
of the Code; and

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City caused a notice to appear in the Los
Angeles Times, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on April 14, 2022, to the effect that
a public hearing would be held with respect to the Project on April 21, 2022 regarding the issuance of the
Bonds; and

 WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Housing Department held said public hearing on such date, at which
time an opportunity was provided to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and




4813-6683-4139.1
 WHEREAS, the minutes of said hearing have been presented to this City Council;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Los Angeles, as
 follows:

 1. The recitals hereinabove set forth are true and correct, and this City Council so finds.
 This Resolution is being adopted pursuant to the Law and the Act.

 2. Pursuant to and solely for purposes of Section 147(f) ofthe Code, the City Cm.mcil
 hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the City in one or more series up to the maximum
 amount below and a like amount of refunding bonds, pursuant to a plan of financing, to finance or
 refinance the Project. It is intended that this Resolution constitute approval of the Bonds: (a) by
 the applicable elected representative of the issuer of the Bonds; and (b) by the applicable elected
 representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is
 located, in accordance with said Section 147(f).

 3. Pursuant to the Law and in accordance with the Act, the City hereby authorizes the
 Los Angeles Housing Department to proceed with a mortgage revenue bond program designed to
 provide housing within the City of Los Angeles for low- and moderate-income persons through the
 issuance of the Bonds for the Project, in one or more series and in an amount not to exceed that
 specified in paragraph 6 hereof.

 4. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary hereof, the City shall be under no
 obligation to issue any portion of the Bonds described in paragraph 6 hereof to be issued by the
 City for the Project prior to review and approval by the City and the City Attorney of the documents,
 terms and conditions relating to such Bonds.

 5. [Reserved].

 6. The "Project" referred to hereofis as follows:

  Project Name: Address #Units: Project Sponsor Maximum
 Amount:
Luna Vista 8767N. Parthenia Place 73 (including 2 Luna Vista, LP $32,997,000
 Los Angeles CA, 91343 manager units)


 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.

 PASSED AND ADOPTED this_ day of _ _ ____, 2022 at Los Angeles, California.

 I certjfy that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Los Angeles at its
 meeting on _ _ __ _, 2022.

 By _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __
 Title _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __




 2
 4813-6683-4139. I
 ..

 TEFRA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING MINUTES
 THURSDAY -APRIL 21, 2022
 10:00 AM
 LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT
 BY TELECONFERENCE
 APOLINAR ABRAJAN, CHAIR


This meeting was conducted to meet the required Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility
Act of 1982 ("TEFRA") Public Hearing for West Thir.d Apartinents\ Broadwav
A partments, Western A venue Apa:r;tments. Vista Terrace, Lun3 Vista~and Colorado East.

This meeting was called to order on Thursday, April 21, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. via
teleconference by the Los Angeles Housing Department.

A notice of this hearing was published in the Los Angeles Times on April 14, 2022 (the
"Notice"). The purpose of this meeting was to hear public comments regarding the City
of Los Angeles' proposed issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds or notes for the
above referenced projects.

The Los Angeles Housing Department representatives present were Apolinar Abrajan,
Steven Brady, Donald Byers, Helen Villagomez, Conny Griffith, and Adam R. Miller.
All representatives were present via teleconference as described in the Notice.

By 10:30 a.m. there were no other representatives from the public who made themselves
available and no public comments were provided, so the meeting was adjourned.

I declare under penalty of perjury that this is a true and exact copy of the TEFRA public
hearing meeting minutes regarding the above referenced projects held on April 21 , 2022
at Los Angeles, California.



CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Los Angeles Housing Department
ANN SEWILL, General Manager




Apolinar Abrajan, Finance Development Officer II
 ...._ ·,
 1 J c1w C' ERi~ 1or\ h. ,!.;\. ,, • , ... . , ._,. 1 .. _
 1 2
 _RE-;-
 GU; ;;:
 LA-;;;-R;;;:
 ~~ou_NC_IL_P._GE_ND_A_TO_B_
 EP_O_ST_Eo-L-_ .
 F::J.
 MOTION

Vista Terrace L.P. (Sponsor), a California limited partnership, has requested that the City of Los
Angeles (City) through the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) issue Multifamily Housing
Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $48,000,000 to finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of
the 102-unit multifamily housing project known as Vista Terrace (Project) located at 8134 and 8146
Van Nuys Blvd. Council District 6. The Project will provide 101 units of affordable housing, and 1
manager unit.

In accordance with the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) and as part of the
bond issuance process, LAHD conducted the required public hearing on April 21, 2022. Notice of
the public hearing was published on April 14, 2022. LAHD is required to provide proof to the
California Debt Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) that a TEFRA hearing has been conducted
as part of the application process. The Sponsor has pledged to comply with all City and LAHD bond
policies related to the work described in this motion, including but not limited to payment of
prevailing wages for labor and project monitoring with the LARD.

The City is a conduit issuer and is required by federal law to review and approve all projects within
its jurisdiction and conduct a public hearing. The bond debt is payable solely from revenues or other
funds provided by the Sponsor. The City does not incur liability for repayment of the bonds. To allow
the bonds to be issued in accordance with CDLAC requirements, the Council should approve the
minutes of the hearing and adopt the required Resolution (attached).

I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council consider the attached results of the TEFRA public
hearing held on April 21, 2022, for Vista Terrace and adopt the attached TEFRA Resolution
approving the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $48,000,000 for the acquisition and
rehabilitation of a 102-unit multifamily housing project located at 38134 and 8146 Van Nuys Blvd in
Council District 6.




 PRESENTED BY:
 NURY • TINEZ ,
 Councilwoman, 6th District




 SECONDED BY:




so
 RESOLUTION

 CITY OF LOS ANGELES


 A RESOLUTION APPROVING FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 147(f) OF THE
 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS OR NOTES BY
 THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES TO FINANCE THE ACQUJSITION,
 REHABILITATION, CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPPING OF A MULTIFAMILY
 RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF
 LOS ANGELES.

 WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles (the "City") is authorized, pw-suant to Section 248, as
amended, of the City Charter of the City and Article 6.3 of Chapter 1 of Division 11 of the Los Angeles
Administrative Code, as amended (collectively, the "Law"), and in accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 5 of
Division 31 (commencing·with Section 52075) of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the
"Act"), to issue its revenue bonds or notes for the purpose of providing financing for the acquisition,
construction, rehabilitation and equipping of multifamily rental housing for persons and families of low or
moderate income; and

 WHEREAS, the City intends to issue for federal income tax pw-poses certain bonds or notes (the
"Bonds") the proceeds of which will be used to finance the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and
equipping of a multifamily rental housing project described in paragraph 6 hereof (the "Project"); and

 WHEREAS, the Project is located wholly within the City; and

 WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City authorize the financing
of the Project, and it is within the powers of the City to provide for such financing and the issuance of the
Bonds; and

 WHEREAS, the interest on the Bonds may qualify for a federal tax exemption under
Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code''), oniy if the Bonds are approved in
accordance with Section 147(f) of the Code; and

 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Code, Bonds are required to be approved, following a public hearing,
by an elected representative of the issuer of the Bonds (or of the governmental unit on behalf of which the
Bonds are issued) and an elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area
in which the Project is located; and

 WHEREAS, this City Council is the elected legislative body of the City and is the applicable
elected representative required to approve the issuance of the Bonds within the meaning of Section 147(t)
ofthe··code; and

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(t) of the Code, the City caused a notice to appear in the Los
Angeles Times, which is a newspaper of general circulation in the City, on April 7, 2022, to the effect that
a public hearing would be held with respect to the Project on April 14, 2022 regarding the issuance of the
Bonds; and

 WHEREAS, the Los Angeles Housing Department held said public hearing on such date1 at which
time an opportunity was provided to present arguments both for and against the issuance of the Bonds; and




4813-6683-4139.1
 WHEREAS, the minutes of said hearing have been presented to this City Council;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Los Angeles, as
 follows:

 1. The recitals hereinabove set forth are true and correct, and this City Council so finds.
 This Resolution is being adopted pursuant to the Law and the Act.

 2. Pursuant to and solely for purposes of Section 147(t) of the Code, the City Council
 hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the City in one or more series up to the maximum
 amount below and a like amount of refunding bonds, pursuant to a plan of financing, to finance or
 refinance the Project. It is intended that this Resolution constitute approval of the Bonds: (a) by
 tbe applicable elected representative of the issuer of the Bonds; and (b) by the applicable elected
 representative of the govern.mental Wlit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is
 located, in accordance with said Section 147(f).

 3. Pursuant to the Law and in accordance with the Act, the City hereby authorizes the
 Los Angeles Housing Department to proceed with a mortgage revenue bond program designed to
 provide housing within the City of Los Angeles for low- and moderate-income persons through the
 issuance of the Bonds for the Project, in one or more series and in an amount not to exceed that
 specified in paragraph 6 hereof.

 4. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary hereof, the City shall be under no
 obligation to issue any portion of the Bonds described in paragraph 6 hereof to be issued by the
 City for the Project prior to review and approval by the City and the City Attorney of the documents,
 terms and conditions relating to such Bonds.

 5. [Reserved] .

 6. The "Project" referred to hereof is as follows:

 Project Name:
 I Address #Units: Project Sponsor I Maximum
 Amount:
-
Vista Terrace 8134 and 8146 Van Nuys 102 (including 1 Vista Terrace, LP $48,000,000
 Blvd., Panorama CA, 91402 tmanager unit)


 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.

 PASSED AND ADOPTED this _ day of _ _ _ _, 2022 at Los Angeles, California.

 I certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Los Angeles at its
 meeting on _ _ __. 2022.

 By _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __
 Title _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __




 2
 48) 3-6683-41 39.1
 ...


 TEFRA PUBLIC HEARING MEETING MINUTES
 THURSDAY - APRIL 21, 2022
 10:00 AM
 LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT
 BY TELECONFERENCE
 APOLINAR ABRAJAN, CHAIR


This meeting was conducted to meet the required Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility
Act of 1982 ("TEFRA") Public Hearing for West Thitd Ae artments, Broadwav
Apartments. Western A venue Apartments, Vista Terrace. Luna Vista, and Colorado East.

This meeting was ca11ed to order on Thursday, April 21 , 2022 at 10:00 a.m . via
teleconference by the Los Angeles Housing Department.

A notice of this hearing was published in the Los Angeles Times on April 14, 2022 (the
"Notice"). The purpose of this meeting was to hear public comments regarding the City
of Los Angeles' proposed issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds or notes for the
above referenced projects.

The Los Angeles Housing Department representatives present were Apolinar Abrajan,
Steven Brady, Donald Byers, Helen VilJagomez, Conny Griffith, and Adam R. Miller.
All representatives were present via teleconference as described in the Notice.

By 10:30 a.m. there were no other representatives from the public who made themselves
available and no public comments were provided, so the meeting was adjourned.

I declare under penalty of perjury that this is a true and exact copy of the TEFRA public
hearing meeting minutes regarding the above referenced projects held on April 21 , 2022
at Los Angeles, California.



CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Los Angeles Housing Department
ANN SEWILL, General Manager




Apolinar Abrajan, Finance Development Officer II
 TO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMENT ON NEXT #53
 1\-f C,ff~lttf.NCOUNCIL AGENDA TO BE PO_ST_ED_..___ _


 ':"he Sunshine Canyon Community Amenities Trust Fund can be used for public-benefit
projects that help to improw: the quality of life for residents in Granada Hills. There is a need to
assist Supporters of La\\" Enforcement in DeYonshire (SOLID), a nonprofit organization and
public-pri..-ate partnership that supports community policing and proYides the officers of the
DeYonshire diYision \Yith additional resources.

 I THEREFORE :\IOYE that the Council RESOLVE that $15,856 in the Sunshine
Canyon Community Amenities Trust Fund No. 699-14 be allocated appropriated to Supporters
of Law Enforcement in De,;onshire (SOLID) organization in order to help to improYe the
working conditions of our LAPD officers and fund new ,.,,orkstation furniture.

 I FL'RTHER :\lOYE that the City Clerk be authorized to make any technical
corrections or clarifications to the abo,;e fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the
intent of this motion.




 PRESENTED BY
 JO
 ~
 . LEE
 Councilmember, 12 District
 - - -~----=-;::;:PO~------r--"':---
 ro·cITTCLERK FOR PIJ.CH,1;:NT ON NEXT
 REGULAR GOJ,\CIL AGENDA TO BE POSTFD




 MOTION
 I MOVE that $15,000 in the Council District 3 portion of the Street Furniture Revenue
Fund No. 43D, Dept. 50 be transferred/ appropriated to the following accounts, and in the amounts
specified, in the Street Services Fund No. 100-86: $10,000 to Account No. 001090 (Salaries,
Overtime) and $5,000 to Account No. 006020 (Operating Supplies) for center median island
landscape improvements on Greenbriar Drive in Council District 3.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Bureau of Street Services be authorized to make any technical
corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the
intent of this Motion




 SECONDED BY:




majs


 SEP 2 i 2022
 n~--
 HOUSING

 MOTION

 On February 25, 2022, the Council and Mayor approved funding for the development of Miramar Gold
(C.F. No. 22-0167) located at 1434 Miramar Street (Project). The Project will be developed by West Hollywood
Community Honsing Corporation (WHCHC) and consist of 94 affordable housing units, including 47 supportive
housing units. On June 15, 2022, the Project was awarded a federal annual allocation of low-income housing tax
credits in the amount of $ 1,981,106. Subsequently, the developer obtained construction cost bids and the final bid
was approximately $6.2 million higher than originally budgeted. Additionally, the increases in interest rates are
forcjng the private lender to add a cushion to the blended rate, further impacting the Project' s budget.

 To help mitigate the funding gap, WHCHC has approached all of the Project's lenders to increase the
previously approved funding amounts. The private permanent loan will be greater by increasing the targeted rents
for the non-supportive housing units to 60 percent Area Median Income. WHCHC has secured a private donor
contribution in the amount of $2 million. Additionally, the Los Angeles County Community Development
Authority is increasing its funding commitment.

 LAHD seeks authority to increase its loan to the developer by $2,771,075 to $13,806,150, reduce the
interest rate, and amend the Project's income mix to help address the Project' s funding shortfall. To accommodate
this fonding request, the Department recommends that the funding commitment for WHCHC's Third Thyme
project be reduced by this amount. The redirection of funds will allow Miramar Gold to close its construction
financing while WHCHC seeks replacement funding from other entities to close Third Thyme by March 2023.

  1 TIIBREFORE MOVE that the City Council, subject to the approval of the Mayor, authorize the General
Manager of the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), or designee, to:

 1. Increase funding for the Miramar Gold Apartments located at 1434 Miramar Street (Project) by
 $2,771,075 from $11,035,075 to $13,806,150.



 l
 2. De-obJi~ te fu_Eds as noted below
 ~roject Nam~
 ThirdThm,e
 Fund No
 HOME
 561
 -=---1 Accoun_t _
 43S800
 Amount

 $2,771 075

 And obli •ate funds as noted below
 Project Name Fund No Account Amount
 HOME
 Miramar Gold 561 43S800 $2,77ll075

 3. Approve the Project's revised unit mix to include 44 non-supportive housing units at 60 percent AMI.



 PRESENTED BY: ------.~
 G
 · \_Cl)\\'t';
 E T A. CEDILLO
 1ember, 1st District
 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & JOB$
 MOTION


 On August 18, 2021, the City Council approved, among other things, the selection of The Bakewell
  Company and Associates as the preferred developer (Developer) of a mixed-use project on City-owned
  property located at 200 East Slauson Avenue, 5828-S936 Wall Street, and S829-5935 South Los Angeles
  Street in Council District Nine (APN 6006-003-900; Properties) and authorized the Economic and
  Workforce Development Department (EWDD) to negotiate and execute an Exclusive Negotiation
  Agreement (ENA) with the Developer for the proposed project (C.F. 19-0362). The proposed project
  consists of a mixed-use development with residential, recreational, retail, and commercial uses (Project).

 Subsequent to the Council's action and prior to the execution of an ENA, the City received
  clarification from the Developer on the following: 1) the City-authorized contracting entity for the ENA
  should be modified from " The Bakewell Company and Associates (Buyer)" to the "The Bakewell Company
  of California, LLC, and The Michaels Organization (Buyer or Lessee); 2) the transfer structure of the City-
  owned Properties should be modified from "sale" to "sale or lease"; and 3) the Project description should
  be modified to include a public park along Slauson A venue (to be transferred to the City's Department of
  Recreation and Parks upon completion); the redevelopment of the Brotherhood Crusade site; and the
  development of affordable housing subject to and contingent upon compliance with the restrictions set forth
  in Government Code Section 37364, along with any other City-required elements, such as parking. Council
  action is needed to authorize the above modifications prior to the execution of an ENA

 I THEREFORE MPVE that the Council action approved on August 19, 2021 , relative to a proposed
  Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with The Bakewell Company and Associates to construct a mixed
  use project on City-owned property located at at 200 East S lauson Avenue, 5828-5936 Wall Street, and
  5829-5935 South Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, CA 90003 (APN 6006-003-900; Properties) (C.F. 19-
  0362), BE AMENDED to:

 1. Modify the authorized contracting entity for the Exclusive Negotiation Agreement from "The
 Bakewell Company and Assoc.iates (Buyer)" to "The Bakewell Company of California, LLC,
 and The Michaels Organization (Buyer or Lessee)";

 2. Modify the transfer instruction of the city-owned properties from "effectuate the sale of the
 P roperties" to "effectuate the sale or lease of the Properties"; and

 3. Modify the scope of the Project to include a public park along Slauson Avenue; the
 redevelopment of the privately-owned Brotherhood Crusade site; and the development of
 affordable housing subject to and contingent upon compliance with the restrictions set forth in
 Government Code Section 37364, along with any other City-required elements, such as
 parking.




 PRESENTEDBY: ./ /7-,1'/~ {/L
 ~REN RICE


 SECONDED BY:

SEP 2 8 2022

 /i.d:?3
  oi
 HOUSING
 MOTION


 In 2018, the City entered into a contract with the State of California Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) (Contract No. C-130849) to provide oversight to implement the California Land Reuse and
Revitalization Act of2004 for the assessment, and if necessary, remediation of City-owned property located at 5867
South Los Angeles Street in Council District Nine (Slauson Wall Site). This action was necessary in order for the
City to detennine subsurface environmental impacts under a Voluntary Cleanup Agreement with DTSC of the
Slauson Wall Site.

 On November 3, 2021, the Cjty Council approved funding in the amount of $126,000 for site preparation
services to be perfmmed by AECOM· (Contract N o. C-135202) (C.F. 09-2665-S6). The City has taken a
phytoremediation approach toward the clean-up of the Slauson Wall Site which involves an untested, innovative,
environmentally friendly, and cost effective method of remediation. AECOM is assisting the City in preparing the
Slauson Wall Site for that clean-up approach.

 Additional funding is needed to continue supporting the work of AECOM, DTSC, and to cover other related
remediation, s ite preparation, and post-remediation costs including, but not limited to, groundwater monitoring,
well destruction, excavation, backfill, and post-remediation soil vapor monitoring costs. Council action is needed
to approve additional funding for the Slauson Wall Site clean-up efforts and authorize the amendment of related
contracts where applicable.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council approve additional funding in the amount of $96,743 from the Los
Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) Low Moderate Housing Fund No. SSJ, Account 43K008, to the City
Administrative Officer (CAO), Fund No. 100-10, Account No. 003040 (Contractual Services) for site preparation
services related to the Slauson Wall Development Project, authorize the CAO to amend Contract C-135202 with
AECOM to add the new scope and increase the not to exceed contract amount to $1,222,195, subject to the approval
of the City Attorney as to form.

 T FURTHER MOVE that the Council approve additional funding in the amount of $113,715 from the
LAHD Low Moderate Housing Fund No. S5J, Account 43K008, for use by LAHD for site assessment and oversight
services related to the Slauson Wall Site and authorize LAHD to amend Contract C-130849 with the State of
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, subject to the approva) of the City Attorney as to form.

 I FUTHER MOVE that the Council approve funding in the amount of $155,000 from the LAHD Low
Moderate Housing Fund No. 55J, Account 43K008, for use by LAH]) for other related remediation, site preparation,
and post-remediation costs including but not limited to groundwater monitoring, well destruction, excavation,
backfill, and post-remediation soil vapor monitoring costs and authorize LAfID to prepare, process and execute any
document(s) necessary to carry out the related work, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Economic and Workforce Development Department be authorized to make
any technical corrections or clarification as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate
the intent of this Motion.

 PRESENTED BY: / ~~ /4!t.-i...-L,--V ~
 .,. .chfuiN D. PRICE
 SECONDEDB




oi S,.. '2 0 J

 ~~
 PUBLIC WORKS




 MOTION
 The Bureau of Engineering (BOE) has conducted a field investigation assessing the
condition and stability of a slope abutting Broadway near 3660 and 3830 North Broadway in the
Lincoln Heights neighborhood. At this location, soil and debris from the slope have covered a
portion of the sidewalk and the road itself. BOE's investigation also found that the dislodged soil
has built up along a stairway at this site and displaced fencing along the stairway. Soil and debris
have also covered part of the retaining wall along this street segment and the retaining wall is
damaged and constructed of deteriorating wood.

 This buildup of dirt and debris is a hazard to pedestrians and drivers and it is imperative
the City take adion to quickly return this street segment to a proper condition. BOE has referred
this site to its Hillside Slope Stability Program to evaluate permanent repairs. As a temporary fix,
BOE is recommending that the soil and debris on the sidewalk, stairway, and road be removed and
the fencing along the stairwell be repaired.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Bureau of Engineering and Bureau of Street Services, with
the assistance of the Department of Water and Power, be instructed to report back with a plan and
timeline for restoring the segment of Broadway near 3660 and 3830 North Broadway to a proper
condition in a timely manner.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Administrative Officer, with the assistance of the Bureau
of Engineering and Bureau of Street Services, be instructed to identify funding to restore this
segment of Broadway.




 Councilmember, 14th District




majs




  EP23 ~
 ~.~
 PUBLIC WORKS

 MOTION
 EJ Choto, one of Southern California's oldest Mexican restaurants still Clmently operating,
opened its doors in 1923 as the Sonora Cafe. Alejandro and Rosa Borquez moved to the City in 1922
and named their restaurant after their home state of Sonora, Mexico. In 1925, the restaurant was renamed
''El Cholo/' the name given to field hands by Spanish settlers in California, after a patron drew a figure
of a Mexican field hand on one of the cafe's paper menus.

 In 1927, Aurelia Borquez, the daughter of Alejandro and Rosa, and her future husband, George
Salisbury, opened their own El Cholo restaurant at Western Avenue, a small counter with three booths
and eight stools. Right away, the Western El Cholo attracted business from early HoJJywood stars and
locals alike. In 1931, the Salisburys moved their restaurant down the street to a larger building at the
intersection of 11 th Street and Western A venue, where it still operates today.

 Despite temporarily closing between 1944 and 1946 as a result of World War li, El Cholo
continued to rise in fame, serving the many Hollywood stars and Los Angeles celebrities who frequented
the restaurant. In 1962, Ron Salisbury, the son of George and Aurelia, opened a new El Cholo in La
Habra, and in 1967, Ron took over full ownership and management of the El Cho lo restaurants.

 In the early 1970s, the Western EJ Cholo was further renovated to expand its footprint and feature
a full bar, a notable moment for a restaurant opened during Prohibition. The seventies would also see the
addition of the burrito to the menu, taking inspiration from East LA's El Tepeyac Cafe and joining other
famous dishes including El Cholo's sweet green corn tamales, classic margaritas, and enchiladas.

 Under Ron's ownership, El Cho]o would continue to expand, selling their billionth tortilla in
1996 and opening locations throughout Southern California including Santa Monica, Corona Del Mar,
Anaheim Hills, and Downtown Los Angeles. El Cholo has been a mainstay of Los Angeles through the
decades, weathering the ups and downs of our City's long history, and 2023 will mark the 100th
anniversary of the restaurant, Ron Salisbury' s 90'h Birthday~ and El Cholo 's first expansion out-of-state
to Salt Lake City, Utah.

 In recognition of El Cholo' s long culinary history in the City and in anticipation of El Cholo's
centennial anniversary in 2023, it is appropriate that the City name the intersection of 11 th Street and
Western Avenue, adjacent to the Salisburys' first El Cbolo restaurant, as "El Cholo Square."

 1 THEREFORE MOVE that the intersection at 11 th Street and Western Avenue be named as "El
Cholo Square" and that the Department of Transportation be directed to erect permanent ceremonial
sign(s) to this effect at this location.



 PRESENTED BY:~l-u~'l...-4~~(.{
 l
 Councilmember, 10th District



 SECONDED BY:
majs
 TPA NSPORTATION

 ,ollJil/llC DEVELOPMENT & JOBS
 MOTION

 On June 29, 2021, the City Council adopted Motion (de Leon - Raman) that instructed and
authorized the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) to negotiate and execute a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) for the proposed
future development of City-owned property located at First and Alameda Street (Mangrove site) and Metro-
owned property located at First Street and Central Avenue (Regional Connector site) in Little Tokyo (C.F.
13-0275-S2).

 The City and Metro have reached agreement on the proposed terms of the MOU and are reflected
in the dratt MOU attached hereto. On April 20, 2022, Metro's Planning and Programming Committee
authorized its Chief Executive Officer to execute an MOU wit11 the City that includes such terms agreed
upon by both parties.

 The main goal of the Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) is to steer
economic development in a manner that yields thriving businesses, and creates job training and career
opportunities for the City of Los Angeles. As such, EWDD is positioned to serve as the lead City
Department in furthering the future development. of the City's Mangrove Site in collaboration with Metro
and its Regional Connector Site.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council adopt the Memorandum of Understanding between
the City of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority for the
proposed future development of City-owned property located at First and Alameda Street (Mangxove site)
and Metro-owned property located at First Street and Central A venue (Regional Connector site)
substantially as attached, and authorize Economic and Workforce Development Department to review and
revise the MOU as needed prior to its execution.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Council authorize the General Manager of EWDD, or designee,
to execute the respective MOU, as well as any other documents necessary, and instruct EWDD, with the
assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst, City Administrative Officer, and all re1e,•ant City departments,
to serve as the lead City Department for the proposed future development of the City's Mangrove Site in
collaboration with Metro and its Regional Connector Site.




 PRESENTED B'i :

 Councilmember 14th District



 SECONDED BY:




 SEP 2 3 2022
 71,~
oi
 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
 BETWEEN THE
 CITY OF LOS ANGELES
 AND THE
 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLTTAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY


This Memorandum of Understanding (''MOU") is entered into as of _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _.
2022 ("Effective Date'') by and between the CITY OF LOS ANGELES ("City"), a municipal
corporation, acting by and through its Office ~)f the Chief Legislative Analyst ("CLA") and the LOS
ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ("LACMTA"), a
public agency existing under the authority of California Public Utilities Code §§ 130050.2 et seq.
The City and LACMTA are collectively referred to herein as "Parties" and individually as a "Party1' ,
and desire to enter into this MOU to coordinate jointly on planning studies, and potential solicitation,
evaluation and selection of development proposal(s) for City-owned and LACMTA-owned properties
adjacent to or in close proximity to the LACMTA Regional Connector Project and Little Tokyo/Arts
District S'tation, as further described and defined below.


 RECITALS


A) WHEREAS, the City is the owner of that certain real property consisting of various parcels
 located at the northeast quadrant of the intersection between 1st Street and Alameda Street in
 the City of Los Angeles as depicted in Attachment A - City Property Map, attached hereto
 (collectively, "City Property").
B) WHEREAS, LACMTA is the owner of that certain real property bounded by 1st Street to the
 north, Alameda Street to the east and Central A venue to the west in the City of Los Angeles
 that will be improved with transit infrastructure and related facilities and operational
 requirements, .leaving an irregularly shaped portion of land available for non-transit use as
 depicted in Attachment B - LACMTA Property Map, attached hereto ("LACMTA
 Property").
C) The City Property and LACMTA Property may also be referred to hereinafter collectively as
 the "Properties''.
D) WHEREAS, LACMTA is currently constructing a regional rail connection on the LACMTA
 Property ("Regional Connector Project").

 1
E) WHEREAS, in connection with the Regional Connector Project:
 1. The City and LACMTA are parties to:
 a. that certain [[Lease dated June 18. 2014]], by ,vhich City has leased to
 LACMTA certain portions of the City Property for use as construction offices;
 and
 b. that certain Covenant and Agreement Regarding Easement dated June 18,
 2014, recorded as fnstrument No. 2014-0633992 in the Official Records of the
 County of Los Angeles, as modified by that certain Property Exchange
 Agreement and Joint Escrow Instrnctions dated [XX. 2020], by which the City
 has granted to LACMTA a temporary construction easement over certain
 portions of the City Property for use as construction and laydown areas.
 2. LACMTA holds surface and subsurface tunnel easements and surface and subsurfac.e
 fan plant easements, in and under certain portions of the City Property, pursuant to
 instruments recorded [XX date] as [Instrument No. XX] and recorded July 22, 2020
 as Instrument No. 20200816610, respectively, in the Official Records of the County
 of Los Angeles.
 3. The agreements and easements described herein may be referred to hereinafter
 collectively as the "Existing Agreements".
F) WHEREAS, the leasehold interest and temporary construction easements described herein
 will terminate in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Existing Agreements.
G) WHEREAS, the City Property and the LACMTA Property are part of the Sustainable Little
 Tokyo vision and present an invaluable development opportunity for the City, LACMTA, and
 the communities ofLittle Tokyo and the Arts District.
H) WHEREAS, LACMTA is willing to study the potential of joining a portion of the LACMTA
 Property with the City Property to present an opportunity for an integrated development
 project to be delivered by a third-party developer.
I) WHEREAS, LACMTA provides essential transit services for its patrons; therefore any
 development of the LACMTA Property must ensure the integrity of LACMTA' s transit
 infrastructure and not interfere with LACMTA 's operations. Accordingly, the Parties wish to
 participate in a coordinated and efficient effort to facilitate transit-oriented development of
 the Properties in a manner that will benefit the citizens of the City and County of Los Angeles
 and increase transit ridership.



 2
J) WHEREAS, LACMTA' s Joint Development Policy establishes certain requirements for the
 solicitatjon, negotiation~ design and construction of Joint Development projects.
K) \\THEREAS, on June 29, 2021, the City Council instructed the CLA to negotiate and execute
 an MOU with LACMTA to coordinate jointly on the development of design guidelines,
 parking and market analysis, and a community outreach strategy for the proposed future
 development of the Properties (collectively, "Planning Activities"), as well as future
 issuances of any Requests for Imerest and/or Request for Proposals related thereto.
L) WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this MOU to define the terms of cooperation and
 to identify the respective roles and responsibilities of the Parties in coordinating jointly on the
 Planning Activities and potential solicitation, evaluation and selection of development
 proposal(s) (collectively, "Development Solicitation and Recommendation Activities"),
 for the Properties.
M) WHEREAS, the Parties understand that any development of the Properties and all processes
 leading thereto shall be consistent with all applicable local, State and Federal laws, and shall
 be subject to future agreements between and among the appropriate parties.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms and conditions contained herein,
LACMTA and the City hereby agree as follows :


 AGREEMENT


1. PARfilS ' RESPONSIBILITIES
 A. The. City shall procure the services of third-party consultants to assist in the Planning
 Activities and Development Solicitation and Recommendation Activities, The City
 shall fund 70% and LACMTA shall fund 30% of the total costs of those third-party
 consultants procured to assist in the Planning Activities and Development Solicitation
 and Recommendation Activities. The third-party consultants shall include, w ithout
 limitation, design/architecture, community engagement, economic and legal experts.
 LACMTA shall be included in the City' s procurement of the third-party consultants,
 8. The City shall coordinate and work w ith the procured third-party consultants and
 LACMTA to study the potential for integrated transit-oriented development of the
 Properties.



 3
C. LACMTA shall make the Regional Connector Project plans and other relevant
 information available to the City to support the Planning Activities, subject to the
 execution of a confidentiality agreement in a fom1 mutually agreed between the
 Parties.
D. The City shall coordinate and work with LACMTA to prepare and issue any
 competitive solicitations for the development of the Prope1ties based on the Planning
 Activities ("Solicitation"). The City will be responsible for ensuring that the drafting
 of the Solicitation documents, implementing the Solicitation process, and the selection
 and implementation of the development project comply with the City's policies and
 procedures. LACMTA will be responsible for ensuring that the Solicitation
 documents and implementation of the development project comply with applicable
 LACMTA policies and procedures, in LACMTA's sole determination.
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the . City, in partnership with
 LACMTA, will lead the Solicitation process for the development of the Properties in
 accordance with all applicable LACMTA policies and procedures and local, State and
 Federal laws.
E. The City shall handle all administrative tasks associated with the Solicitation and will
 be the single point of contact durin_g the procurement process. The City shall issue the
 Solicitation with an attached tri-party Exclusive Negotiation Agreement ("ENA") in a
 form mutually agreed to by the Parties.
F. The City shall oversee the third-party consultants' review of the Solicitation responses
 and the drafting of the tri-party ENA.
G. The City and LACMTA shall work cooperatively and in good faith on the Planning
 Activities and the Development Solicitation and Recommendation Activities,
 including, amongst other activities, processing the Solicitation and timely meeting all
 deadlines and responding to proposers by providing information and documentation
 regarding their respective Properties.
H. The City and LACMTA shall each have members participate in the Solicitation
 evaluation process.
I. The City and LACMTA will obtain all authorizations needed from their respective
 agencies to enter into a tri-party ENA with the selected developer.
J, The City and LACMTA, directly or by and through their third-party consultants, shall
 coordinate in developing and implementing a community outreach strategy through

 4
 all phases of the Planning Activities and Developer Solicitation and Recommendation
 Activities that recognizes and incorporates past and on-going planning efforts in the
 subject communities and is integrated with other LACMTA outreach efforts, where
 practicable. The City, LACMTA and their third-party consultants will coordinate and
 ,,,ork cooperatively with the community to create the structures for commun ity
 participation and engagement, and will establish a community oversight and
 engagement process that is appropriate for the time period before, during, and after the
 disposition of the Properties.


3. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT
 The tenn of this MOU shall commence on the Effective Date and shall remain in full force
 and effect until four (4) years from the Effective Date~unless earlier terminated by the City or
 LACMTA as provided in SectiQn 8 of this MOU. Either party may extend the term of this
 MOU for a period of one (1) year by providing written notice to the other party at least thirty
 (30) days in advance of the termination date. In such case, this MOU shall remain in full force
 and effect until five (5) years from the Effective Date, unless earlier terminated by the City or
 LACMTA as provided in Section 8 of this MOU.


4, INDEMNIFICATION
 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 895.4 of the California Government Code, each of the
 Parties agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless from all liability for damage, actual or
 alleged, to person or property arising out of or resulting from the indemnifying party's acts or
 omissions in the performance of this MOU. In the event of third-party loss caused by
 negligence, wrongful act or omission of both ,Parties, each party shall bear financial
 responsibility in proportion to its percentage of fault as may be mutually agreed or judicially
 determined. The provisions of California Civil Code Section 2778 regarding interpretation of
 indenmity agreements are hereby incorporated.


5. INCORPORATION OF ATTACHMENTS AND RECITALS
 A. The following Attachments are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this MOU
 wherever referred to as though set forth at length, except where certain portions of
 specific Attachments have been deleted or superseded by other sections of this MOU:
 Attachment A: City Property Map

 5
 Attachment B: LACMTA Property Map
 B. The terms set forth in the Recitals above are hereby incorporated by this reference as
 if set forth in full herein.


6. AMENDMENT
 This MOU may on1y be amended in writing and duly executed by both Parties.


7 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATNES
 The following individuals and their successors are designated by the City and LACMT A as
 the authorized representatives of the two Parties for implementation of this MOU, and all
 correspondence and notices relative hereto shall be considered delivered when received by
 these individuals at the following addresses:


 For City: Sharon M. Tso
 Chief Legislative Analyst
 200 N. Spring Street, Suite 255
 Los Angeles, CA 90012
 T: (213) 473-5709
 E: sharon.tso@lacity.org


 For LACMTA: Nicholas Saponara
 Executive Officer
 Transit Oriented Communities
 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
 One Gateway Plaza, Mail Stop: 99-22-2
 Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932
 T: (213) 922-4313
 E: SaponaraN@metro.net


8. TERMINATION
 Either Paity may tenninate this MOU, in whole or part, at any time, upon thirty (30) days
 advance written notice to the other Party.



 6
9 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 A. This MOU constitutes the full and complete understanding between the Parties.
 B. This MOU shall be governed by California law and applicable federal law. If any
 provision of this MOU is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void,
 or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force
 without being impaired or invalidated in anyway.
 C. The tenns of this MOU shall inure to the benefit of. and shall be binding upon, each
 of the Parties and their respective successors and assigns.




 [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE]




 7
The Parties have entered into, agreed to and accepted the terms and conditions of this MOU as of the
Effective Date:


CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
BY AND THROUGH TTS OFFICE OF THE CHTEF LEGTSLATTVE ANAl YST:


By:

 SHARON M. TSO
 Chief Legislative Analyst


ACKNOWLEDGED BY ITS GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT


 By:
 TONY ROYSTER
 General Manager



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MICHAEL N. FEUER, CITY ATTORNEY


By·
 - - - - -- - - - -- --
 Assistant / Deputy City Attorney




LACMTA:
 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY


 By:
 NICHOLAS SAPONARA
 Executive Officer


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAWYN R. HARRISON
Acting County Counsel

 8
By: _ _ _ __ _

  Deputy




 9:
/\TT ACHMEN'T ,A - CITY PROPERTY MAP




 JO
AI1'ACIIM:ENT B - I:.AC:i1TA :PR.OPERIT :\:IAP




 11
 MOTION BUDGET & FINANCE
The TUMO Center for Creative Technologies (TUMO) is a nonprofit organization that provides extracurricular after-school
programs in many countries for youth to develop knowledge, skills, and abilities in various fields of technology and design
including animation, filmmaking, graphic design, illustration, computer games development, photography, robotics, music
composition, new media, and writing. The organization is now in the process of acquiring a site in the Southeast San
Fernando Valley to open the first TUMO Los Angeles Center (the "Project").

The City of Los Angeles, as grantee and pass-through administrator, was awarded $9 million in grant funding in the
2021-22 State Budget for the purposes of property acquisition and/or construction of the future TUMO Los Angeles Center
Project. This funding , which is critical to the advancement of the Project, will be disbursed by the California State Library
Department.

TUMO also received an additional $14.5 million allocation directly from the state in 2022-23 and $1 million frcim the
Program Year 48 Consolidated Plan for this purpose. TUMO is already in the process of acquiring this property, and an
expedited process is required to ensure the funding is available for deposit into escrow.

In order to receive the grant funds, the City and TUMO must submit a completed application and other specific project
information, including a Budget Detail Form, a proposed Activities Timeline, property purchase documentation, and City
authorization to accept the funds.

I THEREFORE MOVE that Council, subject to approval of the Mayor,

 1. Authorize the Controller to create a new interest-bearing special fund, entitled "Grants and Awards", Fund No.
 XXX/10, for the receipt of the $9 million grant award from the California State Library Department and create an
 appropriation account entitled, "TUMO Center Project"; and

 2. Authorize the City Administrative Officer (CAO), or designee, to:
 a. Accept the $9 million in funding designated in the 2021-22 State Budget for the TUMO Center Project;
 b. Deposit these funds into the new Grants and Awards Fund No, XXX/10, and appropriate these funds into
 the TUMO Center Project Account;
 c. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement and expend the funds for the purchase of property acquisition
 consistent with the grant agreement with the State of California for said funding.

 3. If State grant funds or the CDBG funds are not actually transferred in order to be available to meet the close of
 escrow deadline, approve a Reserve Fund Loan in the amount of $10 million to finance the site acquisition
 associated with the TUMO Center Project and authorize the Controller to:
 a. Transfer up to $10 million from the Reserve Fund to the Unappropriated Balance Fund No. 100/58 and
 appropriate therefrom to the TUMO Center Project Account within the Grants and Awards Fund No.
 XXX/10, upon written communication from the CAO;
 b. Upon receipt of grant funds, instruct the CAO to transfer said funds to reimburse the Reserve Fund Loan .

I FURTHER MOVE that the CAO, or designee, be authorized to prepare any necessary Controller instructions and make
technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion, including any
corrections and changes to fund or account numbers.




 PAUL KREKORIAN
 Councilmember, 2nd District




 vJ.. -:=l i;f
 SEF ? J 2022
 Seconded by~ - 7 ' 7 / ~I/--
 '7v-~
 INFORMATION!TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL SERVIC[

 MOTION


 I MOVE that the Council Action of June 22, 2022, relative to the acquisition of real
 property located at 1554 West 11th Place in Council District One (C.F. 22-0438) for the purpose
 ofproviding publicly accessible open space BE AMENDED to include the following action:

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Council AUTHORIZE the General Services
 Department (GSD) to accept the transfer of real property located at 1554 W I Fh Place
 (Property) in Council District One from CRAILA, A Designated Local Authority (CRAILA)
 to GSD as all conditions ofsuch acceptance have either been waived or completed and the
 City has received an "Approval of Removal Action Completion Report" and "Certificate
 of Completion" from the Department of Toxic Substances Control certifying that the
 Property is suitable for unrestricted land use.




SEP 2 3 2022
 r;;(tz,
 oi
 PERSUNNEL. AUOITS. &ANIMAL WELFARE

 MOTION

 Billy, the Asian bull elephant who has lived for decades at the Los Angeles Zoo and
Botanical Gardens (Zoo), has spent much of his time in Los Angeles in conditions that only met
minimums set by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA). For many years before the
opening of the current Elephants of Asia exhibit he was placed alone in a small enclosure where
he was kept on hard surfaces not considered beneficial for his feet and joints, and allegedly
received a lack of sufficient exercise and stimulation.

 Billy long has been exhibiting abnormal (stereotypic) behavioral patterns many elephant
experts characterize as indicating detrimental mental health impacts from that environment.
Elephants of Asia provides a better environment for him and the Zoo's other elephants but one
which cannot compare with that afforded by a sanctuary in terms of space and natural conditions.

 In the new exhibit Billy and the other elephants have had more space but still experience a
lack of soft surfaces, and Billy's very presence along with the cows (females) Tina, Jewel, and
Shaunzi, have until recently necessitated that the acreage be divided into large corrals so that Bi1ly
can be kept separate, as has been the standard for elephant bulls and cows in captivity. This
expanded space has been broken up by being fenced off into areas (called "corrals") separated by
electrified fences.

 Thus, the purpose of the larger exhibit has been compromised, diluting the benefits of the
costly expansion of the usable space for the Zoo's elephants completed a decade ago. Now the
Zoo has decided to allow Billy and the females to occupy the same space at times, an inherently
controversial and risky move according to elephant experts. The Zoo Vision Plan's new proposal
to further expand the usable acreage of the exhibit by about three acres does not ultimately resolve
all of these issues and creates new ones by intruding into wildlife habitats outside of the zoo's
current boundaries.

 Additionally, for several years the Zoo attempted unsuccessfully to collect genetic material
from Billy for use in assisted captive breeding efforts in North America. Techniques for collecting
this material are necessarily extremely invasive, adding to the list of ways Billy's long stay at the
Zoo has been detrimental to his well-being. According to the Smithsonian Conservation Biology
Institute, ''Elephants in zoos breed poorly or not at all."

 Noting that, for assisted reproduction, timing is crucial,the Institute's website continues,
" ... Unfortunately, techniques for freezing an elephant's (reproductive material) and then thawing
it at the opportune moment have not been perfected." This suggests that Billy could continue to
be subjected to invasive treatment in the future with the scant prospect of effectuating successful
breeding. In the unlikely occurrence of an elephant being born it would just increase the size of
the Zoo's herd and, unlike the Zoo's highly-praised condor program, would not increase the
prospect of species survival in the long run.

 Itis past the time the physical discomfort and potential threats to his health Billy has faced
for much of his life should have come to an end. More than a decade ago the Zoo sent Ruby, an
African cow who would not have been compatible with the Asian elephant concept of the current
exhibit, to a sanctuary in Northern California. This earned the Zoo plaudits and allowed Ruby to
live out the rest of her life in the most positive environment then availabl~ to her in North America.

 Subsequent litigation (Leider v. Lewis) found that the Zoo still needed to improve its care
and treatment of elephants. The court found in favor of the plaintiff but it remains disputed as to
whether the Zoo has consistently complied with all of the instructions of the court for improved
treatment of the elephants. Specifically, the Zoo allegedly is not providing the elephants with a
soft surface in the exhibit as ordered by the Superior Court a number of years ago, adding to
concerns about the elephants' physical health. Relocating Billy to a sanctuary is the optimal
solution for him and also would provide Tina, Jewel, and Shaunzi more space on a daily basis.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the Los Angeles Zoo to immediately
cancel any current or future elephant breeding activities or programs involving any current or
future elephants, and, in conjunction with the Chief Legislative Analyst, to report back within 30
days on the steps necessary to begin the process of safely relocating Billy to a suitable sanctuary
environment; and

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Zoo be instructed to immediately comply with all provisions
of the Leider v. Lewis decision irrespective of the legal status of the case, and manage the
Elephants of Asia exhibit as a more open environment for no more than four female elephants at a
time, making more extensive real-time use of the available acreage for cows that have suffered
abuse in previous living situations; and

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Mayor and Council create an animal welfare oversight
committee, comprised of bonafide experts in animal welfare and animal health, to advise the
Mayor, the City Council, the Zoo and the Board of Zoo Commissioners on issues relating to the
safe and healthful care and housing of elephants and all other animals at the Zoo.




 PRESENTED BY: rJ 1M_
 PAULKORETZ
 Councilmember, 5th District
 ---


 SECONDEDB




SEP 2 3 2022
 ITEM 1

 File No. 14-0236

PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE relative to the
reappointment of Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee Relations Board.

Recommendation for Council action:

RESOLVE that the Mayor's reappointment of Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee
Relations Board for the term ending September 23, 2027 is APPROVED and
CONFIRMED. (Current composition: F=3; M=2)

Financial Disclosure Statement: Pending.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE – SEPTEMBER 26, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION – SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)

Summary:

On September 21, 2022, your Committee considered an August 10, 2022 communication
from the Mayor relative to the reappointment of Ms. Rhonda Hilyer to the Employee
Relations Board for the term ending September 23, 2027. After consideration, the
Committee moved to recommend approval of the reappointment of Ms. Hilyer the
Employee Relations Board. This matter is now forwarded to the Council for its
consideration.



Respectfully Submitted,

Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee




COUNCILMEMBER VOTE
KORETZ: YES
HARRIS-DAWSON: YES
BONIN: ABSENT


ARL
9/21/22


 -NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL COUNCIL ACTS-