Sustainability and Transportation Committee — Portland, ME
Date: 2025-11-12
Time: 17:00

Sustainability& Transportation MEMBERS
Committee Agenda Councilor Regina Phillips, Chair
 Councilor Pious Ali, At-Large
November 12, 2025 at 5:00 PM
 Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4




The Sustainability and Transportation
Committee will conduct this meeting
remotely via Zoom. Allow your computer to
install the free Zoom app to get the best
meeting experience. If you are not able to
attend live either in person or via Zoom, a
recording will be available in the Agenda
Center following the meeting.

For public comment via Zoom, you will need
to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise
your hand via the telephone, please hit *9.
You will be unmuted by the host when it is
time for public comment.

https://portlandmaine-
gov.zoom.us/j/89952567500?pwd=zLf7HunT
yswwcokWAwAlXBHcv0WNXl.1




1. Review and approve minutes from October 8, 2025


 a. Minutes from October 8, 2025
2. Sustainability Program Updates


 a. Sustainability Updates
3. Presentation and Discussion


 a. Presentation regarding the Capisic Brook Watershed Management Plan
 Presenter: Ben Pearson
 No public comment will be taken.
 b. Annual report regarding Energy Benchmarking
 Presenters: Katie Tims
 No public comment will be taken.
 c. Review and discussion of updated greenhouse gas inventory
 Presenter: Troy Moon
 No public comment will be taken.
 d. In accordance with 1 M.R.S. section 405(6)(E), the Sustainability and Transportation
 Committee is expected to hold an executive session to consult with its attorneys regarding
 matters related to the regulation of discharges from cruise ships.
4. Other Business

Sustainability& Transportation MEMBERS
Committee Agenda Councilor Regina Phillips, Chair
 Councilor Pious Ali, At-Large
November 12, 2025 at 5:00 PM
 Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4




The Sustainability and Transportation
Committee will conduct this meeting
remotely via Zoom. Allow your computer to
install the free Zoom app to get the best
meeting experience. If you are not able to
attend live either in person or via Zoom, a
recording will be available in the Agenda
Center following the meeting.

For public comment via Zoom, you will need
to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise
your hand via the telephone, please hit *9.
You will be unmuted by the host when it is
time for public comment.

https://portlandmaine-
gov.zoom.us/j/89952567500?pwd=zLf7HunT
yswwcokWAwAlXBHcv0WNXl.1




1. Review and approve minutes from October 8, 2025


 a. Minutes from October 8, 2025
2. Sustainability Program Updates


 a. Sustainability Updates
3. Presentation and Discussion


 a. Presentation regarding the Capisic Brook Watershed Management Plan
 Presenter: Ben Pearson
 No public comment will be taken.
 b. Annual report regarding Energy Benchmarking
 Presenters: Katie Tims
 No public comment will be taken.




 Page 1
 c. Review and discussion of updated greenhouse gas inventory
 Presenter: Troy Moon
 No public comment will be taken.
 d. In accordance with 1 M.R.S. section 405(6)(E), the Sustainability and Transportation
 Committee is expected to hold an executive session to consult with its attorneys regarding
 matters related to the regulation of discharges from cruise ships.
4. Other Business




 Page 2
 CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE
 Committee on Sustainability and Transportation
 Councilor Regina Phillips (D3), Chair
 Councilor Pious Ali (At-Large)
 Councilor Anna Bullett (D4)


Minutes October 8, 2025
Members Present: Councilor Ali, Councilor Bullet, Councilor Michniewicz, Councilor Pelletier,
Councilor Phillips, Mayor Dion
Staff Present: Helen Donaldson, Greg Jordan, Kevin Kraft, Karly Meyer, Troy Moon, Mike
Murray, Greg Watson, Tony Wirkus

Meeting was called to order.

September 10, 2025, Meeting Minutes
The September 10, 2025, meeting minutes were approved unanimously.

Announcement
Councilor Phillips thanked Director Murray, Department of Public Works, and the Maine
Department of Transportation for their work repaving streets.

Sustainability Updates
Presented by Troy Moon and Karly Meyer, Sustainability Office
Visited Little Diamond Island and viewed their living shoreline and joined Kristina Egan at the
Greater Portland Council of Governments for their Regional Councils national conference.

The Neighborhood Mini Grants program launched to bring neighbors together.

The Sustainability Office is partnering with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government to better
understand residents’ concerns related to sea level rise and vulnerabilities.

Katie Tims, Sustainability Associate, recently gave a talk at the Senator George J. Mitchell
Center at the University of Maine on One Climate Future.

The Sustainability Office hosted Park(ing) Day at the end of September.

Mayor Dion recommended that Councilor Phillips follow up with Director Moon to watch the
video produced about the Little Diamond Island living shoreline project.




 Page 3
Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute
and the City of Portland
Councilor Phillips brought forth the resolution supporting the collaboration between the Gulf of
Maine Research Institute and the City of Portland to build coastal resilience and support the
marine economy.

Councilor Phillips asked Mayor Dion if this is something that should be read at a full council
meeting and if it is something that could be put on the agenda.

Mayor Dion stated that it would be on the agenda.

Director Moon read the resolution.

Public Comment on Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine
Research Institute and the City of Portland
Seeing no one wishing to make public comments, the comment period was closed.

Councilor Bullet motioned to bring the resolution before the full council. Councilor Ali seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Amendment to Chapter 28
Presented by Tony Wirkus and Mike Murray
Proposing to change the ticketing for leaving a car on the street during a city parking ban for
snow removal efforts from $40 to $175. Historically, the City has operated the Ocean Gateway
parking lot as an impound lot. However, this lot is slated to become a city park, and will no
longer be available for vehicles.

Currently, the fee structure is such that if you are towed, you pay $135 and a $40 citation. If you
are not towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not permitted to park it, you only
pay a $40 citation.

The proposed change would be such that if you are towed, you would pay $40. If you are not
towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not allowed to park it, you would pay a
$175 citation.

Director Wirkus stated that this looks at a fee structure that ensures it is worth the time and
effort to move your vehicle, so that our public works team can adequately plow the roads and
emergency vehicles can access roads.

In addition to revising the fee structure, the proposal increases the amount of parking space
available during snow bans to include the following areas: parking along Marginal Way until Maj.
Charles J. Loring Memorial Park, Rainbow Mall Road next to the woods, Saint James and
Douglas Streets next to the park, Valley Street south of C Street next to the park. None of these
parking locations are in front of someone’s residence.




 Page 4
Councilor Bullet asked if Director Wirkus could attend her district meeting on December 7 to
discuss parking along Rainbow Mall Road and if communication efforts could be increased by
encouraging residents to sign up for text messages.

Councilor Ali asked how we landed on this fee. Director Wirkus stated that this is below $200,
which is the current fee for parking in an ADA-designated parking spot. That fee is similar, since
it is also blocking accessibility. The tow fee, impound fee, and citation were adding up to over
$200, and so the rate for leaving a car on the street during a snow ban was set to be below
$200.

Public Comment on Amendment to Chapter 28
 ❖​ One resident commented that they are a property manager and higher fines don’t
 necessarily create the reactions one is looking for, but rather consistency in
 enforcement. A drastic change is pretty concerning. Appreciates options for more
 parking. Wants to create a solution before penalizing people. Noted that other areas
 don’t have parking ban fees above $100. Fines are often considered a tax.
 ❖​ Comments were made that this will penalize people; people don’t even know that there
 will be a parking ban or that the city tows. The City is fining people who are not aware of
 what is happening.
 ❖​ A comment was made that the parking ban ends at seven o’clock and you have to move
 your car by seven, which is hard to do. The ban should end at six and cars should be
 moved by seven.
 ❖​ A comment was made that once in a while, parking bans get extended and called much
 too early. Does not approve of the increase and encourages the committee to send this
 back to staff.
 ❖​ A commenter stated that they were very supportive of changes to the policy, both the fee
 structure and adding new snow ban lots. A new development came to Libbytown, and
 the concern was that they would not add much surface parking. The neighborhood was
 supportive of not adding more surface parking. By creating more snow ban lots, we are
 able to have fewer off-street parking lots. Raising the fines is regrettably necessary. It is
 comparable to a cigarette tax, and it may be regressive, but some regressive taxes are
 necessary.
 ❖​ A commenter stated that they were inclined to support the city staff’s proposal.
 Suggested that the impact on lower-income households is something we could mitigate.
 If residents can show their eligibility for food stamps or Section 8 housing, could receive
 a discount of 50%.
 ❖​ A comment was made in support of the increase in availability of options. It is stressful to
 come home from working out of town and find that all of the snow ban parking is taken.
 Around 2,700 snow ban parking spots exist on peninsula; suggested City encourage or
 mandate other garage owners to allow use of garages for parking.

Mayor Dion commented that on the criminal side, increasing fines rarely changes behaviour. He
would like an analysis of enforcement, including how many tow trucks are deployed and how




 Page 5
many officers are available to help remove vehicles. He stated that he is more concerned about
capacity to remove vehicle rather than fining someone. The likelihood of getting towed is more
of a deterrent than a fine.

Councilor Michniewicz commented that there have been fluctuations in the number of people
available. Sees the life-safety issue of such narrow streets. Asks if there is an option to have a
fee between $40 and $175. Asks if there is a gradual fee structure option, like with sidewalk
shoveling.

Assistant City Manager Jordan stated that they could certainly provide data on the strain this
places on the police department. This is a forced-overtime situation for police. The City could try
to quantify the lack of coordination from tow drivers. Thirdly, the loss of the tow lot will impact
things. Can do more work looking at how fines are raised and how populations respond.
Recognized that communication is a big part of this.

Mayor Dion would like to know how we target our limited resources, and if we target certain
areas.

Councilor Pelletier recognized the difficult position. It is expensive to use tow trucks. Would like
to see data on effectiveness of fines. Would also like to see discount on fines for low-income
residents. Would love to see community partners lend their parking spaces.

Councilor Michniewicz asks if impound lot needs to be enclosed or if it can be an open surface
lot. Director Wirkus responded that it needs to be able to be secured.

Councilor Michniewicz stated that during recent conversations about music venues, they looked
at night parking availability, and that there was lots of parking. Suggested that some of those
lots could be pressed into service for this.

Councilor Phillips reiterated that education is key, additional spaces within garages, WEX or
Roux building parking, and asked what happens when a car does get towed. Are you not just
paying the tow truck company? Director Wirkus stated that yes, you just would pay $40 as a
citation, and the $135 would be to the tow truck company for use of their equipment. Councilor
Phillips asked if the committee was under the gun for this proposal. Assistant City Manager
Jordan confirmed that if this went to the council and then back to the committee, it would likely
not be put in place until snow season, which would be too late.

Motion to raise the fee to $175 with some of the changes suggested by the committee.
Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Phillips seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Amtrak Downeaster Location
Presented by Assistant City Manager Greg Jordan
Assistant City Manager Jordan provided an overview. Proposed move of location from its
current location to the Main Line, which is the track directly parallel to Saint John Street. A site




 Page 6
study in 2021 conducted by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT) concluded that a
location parallel to Congress Street would be most advantageous. A follow-up study in 2024 by
the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) looked at three locations and
concluded that a location on the Maine Line along Saint John Street adjacent to the Mercy
Hospital, referred to as Site Three. NNEPRA adopted the recommendations in the plan. From
the beginning of the discussions, City staff have communicated concerns to NNEPRA. City staff
appreciate NNEPRA meeting, however, staff have not been convinced that Site Three is in the
best interests of Portland. NNEPRA has been invited here to present why Site Three is the best
location, as well as City staff to present their assessment and recommendation, and the Greater
Portland Council of Governments, which administers the regional transportation program, to
share their perspective.

Presented by Patricia Quinn, Executive Director of NNEPRA
Provided a brief overview of the history and structure of NNEPRA, NNEPRA’s role as operating
partners for Amtrak Downeaster partners. Provided statistics on the Downeaster trips, ridership,
and passenger destinations. Goal of NNEPRA is to provide more trains with shorter travel times
to connect more trains to more destinations. Have received federal funds to open a station in
Falmouth. Provided overview of Wells Area Improvement Project. This will enable an additional
trip to be added between Wells and Brunswick running every day. The northbound train would
arrive in Portland around 7:55AM. The biggest barrier is that the Portland station is not very
accessible to the downtown currently.

The other issue with the Portland station is that it is currently located down a one-way street,
taking 15 minutes for the train to stop and turn around. This adds cost and makes the train less
competitive.

Ms. Quinn presented a vision for a new mainline station where there are two tracks, making the
stop two minutes. A map and schematic of where the new station location was presented.
Increased connectivity to a variety of locations were discussed. Ms. Quinn noted past studies
supporting moving train stations, as well as stakeholder and public outreach and engagement in
the 2024 plan. Noted support from Maine DOT, Maine Legislature Transportation Committee,
Towns of Brunswick and Wells, Amtrak, and others. Noted request from City of Portland to
conduct an analysis that includes a no-build option and a cost-benefit analysis of all reasonable
alternatives. Ms. Quinn noted plans and challenges for each of the three options evaluated by
NNEPRA. Mr. Dale Doughty, Acting Commissioner of NNEPRA, added additional reasons which
inform and motivate NNEPRA’s plan to change station locations.

Amtrak Downeaster Station Relocation
Presented by Kevin Kraft, Development Director
Discussed site selection of process, role of City in the site selection process. Summarized
historic and current regional transportation plans, as well as implementation process of plans.
Discussed outcomes of 2021 study conducted by City, NNEPRA, Concord Coach Lines, Metro,
PACTS, and other key partners, led by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT). Explained
benefits and drawbacks of each station, from the perspective of the City and the 2021 study.




 Page 7
Presented national examples of integrating rail into downtowns, rail lines located near grade
crossings. Reviewed history of statements made by city on NNEPRA proposal of station move.


Portland Station Relocation - Regional Context
Kristina Egan, Executive Director, Greater Portland Council of Governments (GPCOG)
Discussed goals and role of GPCOG. Goal of GPCOG is cohesion of all regional transportation.
Discussed 2021 study, the goal of which was to analyze whether or not to decouple Concord
Coach Lines from Amtrak Downeaster site. Discussed opportunity costs and benefits of
investing in rail. Reviewed regional transportation goals: make transit easier, create frequent
connections, invest in rapid transit, create transit-friendly places. Preferred Site 2 over Site 3.

Kevin Kraft concluded staff recommendation for Site 2 over Site 3, emphasized investments and
benefits of current station location, identified pathways forward for Council.

Public Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
 ❖​ Support for Site 2 includes transit, bike/ped, and development potential; is most effective
 to meet accessibility goals, land use and planning goals, and holistic community needs;
 proximity to Congress Street and METRO stop is important; revitalizes historic location
 of original use and serves regional and local goals; advances TOD and multimodal
 access; recognition that City staff, regional planners at GPCOG, and the neighborhood
 organizations in/around this site all prefer Site 2.
 ❖​ Opposition for Site 2 includes the concern around land ownership, safety considerations
 related to a 3rd rail crossing Congress St and downtime signals with multiple track
 crossings and vehicle delays, and platform landing on County jail property.
 ❖​ Support for Site 3 includes concern that the City is ignoring the operational difficulties of
 Site 2 and MaineHealth’s preference for Site 3; quick access to MaineHealth and Mercy
 shuttle.
 ❖​ Opposition on Site 3 includes inconsistency with City’s Comprehensive Plan; requires
 significant industrial restructuring.
 ❖​ Concern that the study done to determine size of proposed parking lot is insufficient;
 concern for the impact to surrounding area; concern that carbon emissions were not a
 consideration in the study; concern that MaineHealth is landbanking area with no plan
 for improvement/development to Union Plaza; concern for the cost benefit of this
 potential project.

Councilor Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
Jim Cohen recognizes NNEPRA’s lengthy process to analyze the feasibility of and public input
surrounding this topic. The information presented by City staff has not been seen until today.
Reiterates the following conclusions around reduction of carbon emissions, land ownership and
control on those outcomes.

Greg Jordan recognizes the property ownership concerns, but those issues are downstream
from this conversation at this time.




 Page 8
Dale Doughty notes that Maine DOT and City agree on reassessing Libbytown traffic patterns,
after their federal grant funding was rescinded, and we don’t see a funding path forward anytime
in the near future. MEDOT wants to continue partnering with all parties to determine the best
site, even if the alternatives are not in Portland.

Patricia Quinn reaffirms that Site 3 would support Transit Oriented Development. She goes on
to review some of the regional and service-related changes since the study was conducted
during COVID.

Councilor Bullett notes that Portland’s train station should be urban and future planning means
planning for a future without cars. Councilor Bullett asks if there was in-state ridership modeling
done between Site 3 vs Site 2. Patricia Quinn says they did not, since the sites are so close to
each other. Councilor Bullett asks Dale Doughty, MaineDOT, to expand on the federal grant
clawbacks mentioned. There are still federal grants being announced, we can get you more
details on those. We didn’t get public comment from Mercy or MaineHealth, and just wanted to
make sure they are aware of this public comment. Greg Jordan mentioned that representatives
of MaineHealth on the attendee side, we have corresponded with property owners, but
confirming that we did not receive public comment from either organizations. Councilor Bullett
shares her support for the alternatives analysis and re-emphasizes the key to walkability to the
train station.

Councilor Pelletier asks if Site 3 is up for sale? Patricia Quinn states that we have had
conversations with all property owners impacted by Site 3 and all have expressed their
willingness to work with us. Is the only feasible layover facility the one mentioned on the
Mountain Branch? The primary layover facility is in Brunswick and would still be able to be
accessed by any new station, some of them just require the backup movement and multiple
movements. Is there an implication that Amtrak would no longer service Portland if there isn’t a
favorable outcome here? I think we were talking about ‘what’s next’ such that if we go back and
conduct an alternatives analysis and we determine that Falmouth is the most viable alternative,
because of the limited viable spaces available in Portland, then that may be the outcome. If we
moved to conduct an alternative analysis and work with MaineHealth to find a compromise.

Councilor Ali asks Mayor Dion if there was other sources of funding that could be accessed to
help fund this study? Mayor Dion submit this project for analysis in the U.S. Mayor’s Conference
design guidance for land use issues. There is an opportunity for us to work together and hard
bargain for what something could look like, but perhaps a third party can help us determine what
is in the best interest of all.

Councilor Michniewicz shares her support for the Mayor’s advice on collaborating with a
third-party and for all members not backing away from this conversation.

Mayor Dion suggests Legal should provide clarity on land acquisitions and other relevant
issues.




 Page 9
Councilor Phillips notes her appreciation for the public comment concerning parking lot size.
Councilor Phillips goes on to remind us of all of our City planning documents that outline our
goals and aspirations that direct this work. So many of these documents outline our concern for
public safety. Site 3 does not have sufficient connection with METRO lines. There are five
businesses co-located with Site 3, all of which would have to move if Site 3 was selected. That
is certainly a concern that has not been noted tonight. Councilor Phillips shares her surprise that
a facilitated conversation has not happened already.

Greg Jordan suggests that a facilitated discussion would be couched within the greater
alternatives analysis and further technical and financial studies.

Councilor Phillips suggests we need to change the recommendation before us, being step 1
being a facilitated discussion with a third party and step 2 conducting an alternative study.
Councilor Bullett adds that those steps could happen simultaneously. Financial cost
breakdowns, land ownership, and legal analysis of the options at hand.

Motion to Recommend an Alternative Study for the Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
and an Additional Directive for Staff to Engage NNEPRA in the Solicitation of a Mediator
to Provide the Objective Data to Inform the Committee
Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Ali seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0.

Motion to Adjourn
The motion was moved by Councilor Bullett and seconded by Councilor Ali.
The motion was approved 3-0.

Meeting Adjourned




 Page 10
City of Portland | Sustainability Office
Troy Moon, Director



To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee
 Regina Phillips, Chair




MEETING DATE
November 12, 2025

AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Item #2A– Sustainability Updates

PURPOSE
To update the committee regarding recent activities of the Sustainability Office to
advance Council goals and objectives related to One Climate Future

COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT
These projects implement elements of the One Climate Future Plan or other Council
goals.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS

Project: Sustainable Neighborhoods

On November 8, our office hosted the first Neighborhood Leaders Summit. The program
convened groups who received a Sustainable Neighborhoods Mini Grant as well as other
community members nominated by their neighbors. Participants also included several
individuals who work with the Office of Economic Opportunity as Natural Helpers.
Participants shared information about their projects as well as ideas for building
community across the City. The program built a lot of excitement and participants
would like to maintain connections, which will be a key focus of our Sustainable
Neighborhoods program during the upcoming year.

Project: Waste Reduction

We hosted our third annual Pumpkin Cycle, where we ask residents to bring their
jack-o-lanterns, pumpkins, and gourds to Payson Park, where we can collect them to be



 1

 Page 11
composted. While the event is fun and promotes composting, the real goal of this event
is to help us avoid overwhelming our community compost sites with pumpkins.

The City Council accepted a grant from the Maine DEP that will allow us to add a
compost drop off site on Irving Street at Heseltine Park. It will also allow us to build
attractive kiosks at most of the drop off sites that will provide some shelter for the carts
and will also provide space for community notices. As part of this program expansion we
will be conducting additional education and outreach activities about composting
including community events at some of the sites. Work will begin in the spring.

Project: Energy

We are launching a new campaign to encourage residents to make their homes more
energy efficient. We distributed energy efficiency kits to people who attended
Pumpkincycle and have also produced a short promotional video, which we translated
into several languages with the help of the Natural Helpers program participants.

The City has filed as an intervenor in the PUC’s docket regarding CMP’s request for a
Finding of Public Convenience and Necessity for their Greater Portland Transmission
Upgrade project. This will allow us to be a full participant in the proceedings to ensure
that the City’s interests are fully considered. The process will take at least a year.



Project: Community Education and Engagement

During the last committee meeting, Councilors requested to see the video created by
Little Diamond Island residents which offers an inspiring look at the completion of the
Cogawesco Park Artificial Sand Dune Project on Little Diamond Island. Over the course
of 5 weeks in September and October of 2024, several island cottage owners, their
families and friends (under the leadership of the Waterfront and Buildings & Grounds
Committees), put in over 800 hours of volunteer labor to build and stabilize a new
protective sand dune and reimagine the cherished LDI casino beach.

The Sustainability Office is partnering with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government
to survey Portland residents, with a focus on Bayside, about their knowledge of climate
vulnerabilities and to hear what their concerns are about climate change. A group of five
graduate students are engaged on the project and are currently connecting with
neighborhood leaders. They are working on a survey to be conducted in collaboration
with a professional polling firm and are organizing in person opportunities to connect




 2

 Page 12
with Bayside residents. They will provide us with a report in December that will inform
our resilience planning efforts..

On October 21, Troy attended the 2025 Extension Disaster Education Network Annual
Conference which convened in Portland this year. He participated on a panel with
representatives from GPCOG and Maine Sea Grant to discuss the impacts of the January
2024 storms on Maine’s coastal and island communities.

On November 6, our Resilience Fellow, Brenda Kirlin, hosted an Apartment-Friendly
Wildflower Workshop at the East End Community Center to teach residents planting
techniques and how to overwinter native wildflowers from seed.

We hosted a Coffee & Climate event: “Climate Action in Maine” with Congresswoman
Chellie Pingree on October 10. Our last two Coffee & Climate webinars for 2025 are “From
Donation to Difference” with Goodwill Northern New England on November 14 and
“Climate Resilience Zoning” with Portland and South Portland planning staff on
December 12.

Visit www.oneclimatefuture.org to sign up for our once-a-month newsletter where we
share the upcoming Coffee & Climate topic, information on upcoming events, new
programs launching, and climate action progress in Portland and South Portland.




 3

 Page 13
 Capisic Brook Watershed Management
 Plan Update




 November 12, 2025

Page 14
Capisic Brook
Location: Small, 2.5-mile-long urban stream primarily in the City of Portland, with
a small portion in Westbrook.
Watershed Size: 1,478 acres.
Path: Begins near Warren Avenue, flows through dense commercial/residential
areas, enters Capisic Pond, and ultimately joins the Fore River near Casco Bay.
Tributaries: East (near Evergreen Cemetery), North (north of Warren Ave), and
West (near I-95/Portland-Westbrook line)



The original Watershed
Management Plan from 2012 was
updated in 2025
 Page 15
Page 16
Capisic Brook is listed as a Class C
waterbody under the State’s Water
Quality Standards, the lowest
classiﬁcation

Urbanization has greatly changed
Capisic Brook and now roughly a third of
the watershed is a paved or built surface

Capisic Brook does not meet the Class C
standard and has been listed as
“Impaired” and subject to the Urban
Impaired Stream requirements under
the Stormwater regulations
 Page 17
Page 18
Stressors and Pollutant Sources
Primary Habitat Stressors (from 2023 Field Assessments):

 ● Fill encroachment, artificial stream channel modifications (straightening,
 artificial stabilization/hardening).
 ● In-stream obstructions, lack of woody substrate, undersized culverts.
 ● Lack of vegetated buffer, large impervious areas without stormwater controls.

Nonpoint Sources and Point Sources (NPS): Diffuse sources across the
watershed.

 ● Stormwater runoff from developed areas, future IC increases, chlorides (road
 salt), pet waste, fertilizer.
 ● Stream incision and streambank destabilization and erosion
 ● Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), Illicit sewer discharges



 Page 19
•Wood additions (chop & drop, anchored logs) •Nature-based bank stabilization
•Culvert upgrades/removals •Outfall
 Page 20
 repairs •Riparian buffer establishment
•Infiltration Tree Trenches •Bioretention swales/bumpouts •Rain Gardens
•Underground storage chambers Page 21
Improving Capisic Brook will require CIP
and Operating Budget Funds
 Page 22
https://www.portlandmaine.gov/561/Capisic-Brook-Watershed




 Questions & Answers
 Contact bnp@portlandmaine.gov

 Page 23
City of Portland | Sustainability Office
Troy Moon, Director



To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee
 Regina Phillips, Chair




MEETING DATE
November 12, 2025

AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Item #3B

PURPOSE
To update the committee on progress made in the 2024 cycle of implementing the
Energy Benchmarking Ordinance.

COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT
The success of the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance is a key element of the One Climate
Future Plan and will aid the City in reaching its climate goals.

BACKGROUND
Energy benchmarking is the process of measuring a building's energy and water
consumption over time. Jurisdictions nationwide have adopted energy benchmarking
and transparency policies as foundational tools for building decarbonization. These
ordinances promote the efficient use of energy and water, contributing to a reduction in
greenhouse gas emissions. By annually inventorying energy usage and comparing
buildings of similar size and function, property owners can make data-driven decisions
and effectively pinpoint areas of underperformance for improvement.

The City of Portland adopted its energy benchmarking ordinance on November 7, 2016,
requiring the annual reporting of water and energy usage for all covered public
(municipal) and private (non-municipal) properties. Subsequently, on July 15, 2019,
the City Council voted to begin mandatory reporting for all single-occupant buildings,
defined as any building where a single tenant utilizes 90% or more of the building
space. All other covered properties will be required to comply one year after the
Sustainability Office certifies that whole-building aggregated energy use data is
available from the utility in a convenient electronic format.



 1

 Page 24
2024 REPORTING CYCLE
There are over 600 covered properties in Portland. Excluding properties that are vacant,
under significant renovation, are under new ownership, or new development (and do
not have 12 months of utility data), there were approximately 595 covered properties in
Portland this reporting cycle.

 Property Type Status this Reporting Season Number of Properties in
 Portland
 Multi-tenant Exempt 292
 properties
 ≥ 20,000 sq. ft.
 Unconditioned spaces Exempt 4
 (e.g. parking garages)
 ≥ 20,000 sq. ft.
 Single-tenant Not exempt 259
 properties
 ≥ 20,000 sq. ft.
 Municipal properties Not exempt 40
 ≥ 5,000 sq. ft.


The Sustainability Office received 213 Energy and Water Use Benchmarking Reports
for calendar year 2024. There were 40 municipal buildings and 173 non-municipal
buildings reported. Of the non-municipal buildings, 167 were found to have sufficient
energy and water use data to calculate a Building EUI. This represents a significant
improvement in data quality compared to the prior year (137 EUI-eligible reports in
the 2023 cycle). Only 6 reports were missing crucial data requested. 110 single-tenant
properties failed to report this reporting cycle.

COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT
Since 2019, Sustainability staff have collaborated with covered properties to establish
processes for achieving compliance with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance.
Acknowledging the interruption in municipal services due to COVID-19 in 2020,
Sustainability staff have conducted robust and repeated outreach through multiple
channels to multiple property representatives to help with participation and compliance
since 2021.

The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure property owners
had a fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year of dedicated
outreach, the Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of violation




 2

 Page 25
letters to covered properties currently mandated to report (single-occupant buildings
20,000 sq ft or more).

Properties who fail to comply with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance a second time
and are issued a second notice of violation will be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day.

LOOKING TO THE FUTURE
 ● Onboarding multi-tenant buildings: As the ordinance states, multi-tenant
 buildings 20,000 square feet or more are required to report energy and water use
 metrics once the utility is able to provide whole-building energy usage data in a
 convenient online format. Central Maine Power is currently working on this
 platform, with hopes to launch in 2026. The Sustainability Office anticipates
 multi-tenant buildings will be required to report starting in 2027. We will
 strongly encourage and support multi-tenant buildings in voluntarily reporting
 as soon as the platform becomes available.
 ● Contact with building owners: There are around 600 buildings covered under the
 ordinance in the City of Portland. Sustainability staff has had difficulty reaching
 the building owners of these buildings as Assessor’s Office information is the
 basis for benchmarking contact. Additionally, staff struggle to continue to reach
 the correct contact at each building due to staff turnover and new reporters
 unable to access their existing accounts. Staff is working to better communicate
 with reporters to create continuity over time in case of turnover. The
 Sustainability Office currently has contact information for 413 covered buildings
 (68%). This is an improvement from 391 buildings (64%) last year.
 ● Education: Without support and free educational resources, the energy
 benchmarking ordinance remains a compliance hurdle for building owners,
 failing to become the motivating force for energy performance improvements it
 should be. This ordinance requires staff support to drive building owners
 towards proactive investment in long-term energy efficiency and building
 decarbonization. City staff will focus on providing more programming in relation
 to the landscape of funding and technologies and building owners’ needs arise.

PREPARED BY
Katie Tims, Sustainability Associate


ATTACHMENTS
2024 Energy Benchmarking Report
2024 City of Portland Building Disclosure Report
2024 Energy Benchmarking Disclosure Report



 3

 Page 26
2024 Energy Benchmarking Report
 November 12, 2025




 Page 27
Overview
Energy benchmarking is the process of measuring a building's energy and water consumption
over time. Jurisdictions nationwide have adopted energy benchmarking and transparency
policies as foundational tools for building decarbonization. These ordinances promote the
efficient use of energy and water, contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. By
annually inventorying energy usage and comparing buildings of similar size and function,
property owners can make data-driven decisions and effectively pinpoint areas of
underperformance for improvement.

The City of Portland adopted its energy benchmarking ordinance on November 7, 2016,
requiring the annual reporting of water and energy usage for all covered public (municipal) and
private (non-municipal) properties. Subsequently, on July 15, 2019, the City Council voted to
begin mandatory reporting for all single-occupant buildings, defined as any building where a
single tenant utilizes 90% or more of the building space. All other covered properties will be
required to comply one year after the Sustainability Office certifies that whole-building
aggregated energy use data is available from utilities in a convenient electronic format. The
Sustainability Office will notify affected property owners upon this certification.


 Property Type Initial Reporting Deadline

 Covered Municipal Properties ≥ 5,000 sq. ft. May 1, 2019

 Covered Single-Tenant Non-Municipal Properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. May 1, 2019

 Covered Multi-Tenant Non-Municipal Properties ≥ 20,000 sq. ft. Anticipated May 1, 2027


Benchmarking Methodology and Key Metrics
Data Collection and Building Identification
The Sustainability Office obtains a list of buildings 20,000 sq ft or more from the Assessor’s
Office. Each building is assigned a Unique Building Identifier (also known as UBID) that is
geolocated and is unique for that building, even if the building envelope is modified.

Data Reporting
The ordinance relies on self-reported data input into Energy Star Portfolio Manager by building
owners or individuals designated by the building owner. The information required includes
property address; primary use type; gross floor area; monthly energy usage for all energy types;
and monthly water usage. Portfolio Manager applies a complex analytic model to compare and
rank similar types of buildings across the country and over time by adjusting for differences in
weather, climate, and use characteristics.

Key Metrics Analyzed in Report
 ● ENERGY STAR Score: The ENERGY STAR score is a 1 to 100 score that
 demonstrates the energy efficiency of a building relative to similar buildings across the
 country. It offers a simple way to communicate relative performance across a portfolio of




 Page 28
 buildings. ENERGY STAR scores are based on data from national building energy
 consumption surveys, allowing ESPM to control for key variables affecting a property’s
 energy performance, including climate, hours of operation, and building size. Not all
 building types are eligible for an ENERGY STAR score, and an ENERGY STAR score is
 not required for compliance with this program.
 ● Weather Normalization: Energy use changes due to colder winters or hotter summers;
 weather-normalized energy is the energy use a property would have consumed during
 30-year average weather conditions. Using weather normalized values helps better
 understand changes in energy across years regardless of differences in weather.
 ● Energy Use Intensity (EUI): EUI is expressed as energy per square foot per year. It is
 calculated by dividing the total energy consumed by the building in one year by the total
 gross floor area of the building. Site EUI measures the amount of energy actually
 consumed at the building site, the same number one would see on their utility bills.
 Source EUI measures the total amount of raw fuel that is needed to generate and
 transmit the energy used at the building site providing a comprehensive picture of a
 building's total energy footprint.
 ● Total (Location-Based) Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Total (Location-Based)
 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions refers to the sum of all greenhouse gas emissions
 that occur at a specific property, calculated using location-specific emission factors. This
 includes calculating emissions from direct sources (also known as Scope 1) and indirect
 sources like the electricity used at the site (also known as Scope 2), based on regional
 grid data. It provides a clearer picture of emissions directly tied to the physical location of
 operations. Total (Location Based) GHG Emission Intensity is the total GHG emissions,
 direct and indirect, produced by the property divided by the property’s gross floor area.

2024 Reporting Cycle
Compliance Notification and Outreach
The Sustainability Office initiated the 2024 reporting cycle in January 2025 by distributing official
notice letters to all property owners with buildings of 20,000 square feet or more in the City of
Portland. These letters clarified the mandatory reporting requirement for single-tenant buildings
and the delayed requirement for multi-tenant properties.

Trainings and Support
Sustainability staff conducts outreach to covered properties, provides direct support with the
ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool, and step-by-step guidance for first time
reporters. Sustainability staff also review submitted benchmarking reports to identify and
communicate issues that must be corrected for compliance. Sustainability staff have created
many short tutorials for frequently asked questions and explaining how to fix common errors in
benchmarking reports. All trainings, step-by-step guidance documents, and presentations can
be found at portlandmaine.gov/energybenchmarking.

Compliance Enforcement
Since 2019, Sustainability staff have collaborated with covered properties to establish
processes for achieving compliance with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance. Acknowledging




 Page 29
the interruption in municipal services due to COVID-19 in 2020, Sustainability staff have
conducted robust and repeated outreach through multiple channels to property representatives
to increase participation and compliance since 2021.

The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure property owners had a
fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year of dedicated outreach, the
Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of violation letters to covered properties
currently mandated to report (single-occupant buildings 20,000 sq ft or more).

Properties who fail to comply with the Energy Benchmarking Ordinance a second time and are
issued a second notice of violation will be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day.

2024 Data Analysis
There are over 600 covered properties in Portland. Excluding properties that are vacant, under
significant renovation, are under new ownership, or new development (and do not have 12
months of utility data), there were approximately 595 covered properties in Portland this
reporting cycle.


 Property Type Status this Reporting Season Number of Properties
 in Portland

 Multi-tenant properties Exempt 292

 Unconditioned spaces Exempt 4
 (e.g. parking garages)

 Single-tenant properties Not exempt 259

 Municipal properties Not exempt 40


The Sustainability Office received 213 Energy and Water Use Benchmarking Reports for
calendar year 2024. There were 40 municipal buildings and 173 non-municipal buildings
reported. Of the non-municipal buildings, 167 were found to have sufficient energy and water
use data to calculate a Building EUI. This represents a significant improvement in data quality
compared to the prior year (137 EUI-eligible reports in the 2023 cycle). No EUI can result from
missing data, having gaps in the dates data is entered, or if the building is part of a larger
campus that shares meters between buildings. Only 6 reports were missing crucial data
requested. Of the buildings with EUIs, there are 41 unique property types. 110 single-tenant
properties failed to report this reporting cycle.

A complete list of 2024 covered properties (municipal and non-municipal), their compliance
status, and publicly available benchmarking information is available at
www.portlandmaine.gov/energybenchmarking.




 Page 30
2024 Compliant Properties by Largest Property Use

Category Property Use Number of Gross Floor Area
 Reports (GFA) in Sq Ft

City Buildings City Hall, Fire Stations, K- 40 3,374,433
 12 Schools, Jetport, etc.

College/University University Buildings, 32 2,354,350
 College Buildings

Hospital General, Medical, Surgical, 5 2,041,806
 and Specialty Hospital;
 Surgical Centers

Storage/Distribution Non-Refrigerated 19 1,755,756
 Warehouse; Self-Storage
 Facility; Distribution Center

Hotel Hotel 17 1,619,022


Office Medical Office; Financial 17 1,337,735
 Office; Bank; Courthouse

Retail Strip Mall; Auto Dealership; 15 813,668
 Supermarket; Retail Store

Residential Senior Living; Multifamily 12 787,689
 Housing; Residential Care
 Facility

Industrial Manufacturing/ Industrial 8 642,360
 Plant

Parking Parking Garages 2 505,441


K-12 Schools Private K-12 Schools 7 140,747

All Other Buildings Bank Branch, Bowling 33 974,316
 Alley, Fitness Center,
 Library, Mixed Use
 Property, Not Available,
 Performing Arts, Repair
 Services, Worship Facility

TOTAL 207 16,347,323




 Page 31
ENERGY STAR Score
The ENERGY STAR Score is a measure of how well a property performs relative to similar
properties across the country, when normalized for climate and operational characteristics.
ENERGY STAR Scores range from 1-100 where one represents the worst performing
properties and 100 represents the best performing properties. A score of 50 indicates that a
property is performing at the national median, taking into account its size, location, and
operating parameters. A score of 75 indicates that a property is performing in the 75th percentile
and may be eligible to earn ENERGY STAR Certification.

Not all properties can generate an ENERGY STAR score because a property must meet criteria
for property type, use details, and have 12 months of energy data for all fuel types. Both charts
below reflect compliant property types in 2024 that were able to generate an ENERGY STAR
score. The average Energy Star Score for all compliant property types in 2024 is 63.6.

2024 Compliant Properties' ENERGY STAR Score (1-100) by Gross Floor Area (ft²)




Note: A single data point (Property GFA of 1,483,216 sqft, ENERGY STAR Score 27) was excluded from the graph
above for improved scale visualization.




 Page 32
2024 Compliant Properties' ENERGY STAR Score by Year Built




Source Energy Use Intensity (EUI)
EPA has determined that source energy is the most equitable unit of evaluation for comparing
different buildings to each other. Source EUI measures the total amount of raw fuel that is
needed to generate and transmit the energy used at the building site providing a comprehensive
picture of a building's total energy footprint. ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager calculates
source EUI by dividing the total annual source energy consumption by the building's gross floor
area. Source energy is calculated by converting all energy types (like electricity and natural gas)
to a common unit (kBtu), adding them together, and then applying multipliers to account for
energy loss during generation and transmission.




2024 Compliant Properties' Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) by
Gross Floor Area (ft²)




 Page 33
Note: A single data point (Property GFA of 1,483,216 sqft, Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI 490.7
kBtu/ft²) was excluded from the graph above for improved scale visualization.


2024 Compliant Properties' Weather Normalized Normalized Source EUI (kBtu/ft²) by Year
Built




 Page 34
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Total location-based (or site-level) total GHG emissions refers to the sum of direct and indirect Commented [1]: if we include intensity,
GHG emissions that occur at a specific property. The average number of total (location-based) mention it above here
GHG emissions for all compliant property types in 2024 is 498.3 metric tons CO2e.

2024 Compliant Properties' Average Total (Location-Based) GHG Emissions (Metric Tons
CO2e) by Largest Property Use




*College/University: The calculated total GHG emissions for properties within the College/University sector may not
be fully representative of individual building performance or the true sector average, as many institutions share
central utility systems (e.g., for heating/cooling) and report energy consumption and emissions data at a 'campus'
level, which requires the use of allocation methods.




 Page 35
Data Quality
Staff implemented the use of an implementation platform called BEAM by Clearly Energy during
the 2022 reporting season. Previously, data quality checks for each report were done manually
making it difficult to correct errors in reports after the initial report was submitted. Data quality
has improved each year since using BEAM.




Properties using default, estimated, and temporary values are considered low levels of data
quality. Site EUI and Source EUI may be noted as “Not Available” if energy data was input
incorrectly, there was not a full year of data to analyze, or if the building is part of a parent
property. ENERGY STAR scores of 1 or 100 indicate energy data or property gross floor area
(GFA) were input incorrectly. Only 6 reports (of ENERGY STAR Score of 100) fall into this
category.



Looking to the Future
 ● Enforcement: The City has deliberately delayed the issuance of violations to ensure
 property owners had a fair opportunity to comply. Following this fourth consecutive year
 of dedicated outreach, the Sustainability Office has decided to issue the first notice of
 violation letters to covered properties currently mandated to report (single-occupant
 buildings 20,000 sq ft or more). Properties who fail to comply with the Energy
 Benchmarking Ordinance a second time and are issued a second notice of violation will
 be subject to a fine of $20.00 per day. We anticipate that enforcement of these penalties
 for non-compliance will result in greater compliance in all years moving forward.
 ● Onboarding multi-tenant buildings: As the ordinance states, multi-tenant buildings
 20,000 square feet or more are required to report energy and water use metrics once the




 Page 36
 utility is able to provide whole-building energy usage data in a convenient online format.
 Central Maine Power is currently working on this platform, with hopes to launch in 2026.
 The Sustainability Office anticipates multi-tenant buildings will be required to report
 starting in 2027. We will strongly encourage and support multi-tenant buildings in
 voluntarily reporting as soon as the platform becomes available.
● Contact with building owners: There are around 600 buildings covered under the
 ordinance in the City of Portland. Sustainability staff has had difficulty reaching the
 building owners of these buildings as Assessor’s Office information is the basis for
 benchmarking contact. Additionally, staff struggle to continue to reach the correct
 contact at each building due to staff turnover and new reporters unable to access their
 existing accounts. Staff is working to better communicate with reporters to create
 continuity over time in case of turnover. The Sustainability Office currently has contact
 information for 413 covered buildings (68%). This is an improvement from 391 buildings
 (64%) last year.
● Education: Without support and free educational resources, the energy benchmarking
 ordinance remains a compliance hurdle for building owners, failing to become the
 motivating force for energy performance improvements it should be. This ordinance
 requires staff support to drive building owners towards proactive investment in long-term
 energy efficiency and building decarbonization. City staff will focus on providing more
 programming in relation to the landscape of funding and technologies and building
 owners’ needs arise.




 Page 37
 Water
 Use Primary %
 Total (Location- Intensity Property Difference % Difference
 Based) GHG Total (Location- Weather Weather (All Type - Property GFA - from from
 Property Emissions Based) GHG Normalized Normalized Water ENERGY Portfolio Calculated National National
 is Part of a Intensity Emissions (Metric Site EUI Site EUI Source EUI Source EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) Tons CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Passed Not Exempt 87MFPP27+93-2-1-1-2 Allen Ave Fire Station 386 Allen Ave 4.88 27.34 78.6 84.2 148.6 157.4 32.74 Fire Station 5600.0 19.0 19.0


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP3H+84-2-2-2-2 Bramhall Fire Station 784 Congress St 5.20 76.28 89.3 93.6 136.3 140.9 19.25 Fire Station 14675.0 9.1 9.1


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+MP-2-2-1-2 Central Fire Station 380 Congress St 4.47 72.04 79.6 90.0 106.4 117.6 10.92 Fire Station 16110.0 -14.8 -14.8


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPH3+8G-0-1-1-2 Stevens Avenue Fire Barn 212 Stevens Avenue 7.13 35.92 96.8 101.3 138.2 143.6 5.71 Fire Station 5040.0 10.7 10.7

 Fitness
 Center/Health
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4F3-4-2-3 Exposition Building 239 Park Av 9.62 596.68 156.8 162.5 285.2 291.2 9.80 Club/Gym 62038.0 154.6 154.6

 Ice/Curling
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4F+HF-3-3-3-2 Portland Ice Arena 225 Park Av 19.21 642.18 321.3 324.1 537.3 539.6 40.88 Rink 33437.0 379.7 379.7


Passed Not Exempt x Lyseth Elementary School 175 Auburn St 1.18 58.57 16.5 16.5 46.2 46.2 19.83 97 K-12 School 49444.0 -55.4 -55.4

 Amanda C. Rowe Elementary
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMHJ4-6-4-5 School 23 Orono Road 3.79 288.11 64.1 66.6 103.3 106.0 4.32 52 K-12 School 76053.0 -2.6 -2.6


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2V3-3-1-4 Deering High School 370 Stevens Av 4.03 771.81 71.9 79.3 95.3 103.3 6.43 48 K-12 School 191438.0 1.3 1.3


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPCW4-5-4-5 East End Community School 195 North St 5.41 392.96 92.2 98.6 144.7 151.4 10.15 17 K-12 School 72620.0 42.7 42.7


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4G+X5-4-4-6-5 King Middle School 92 Deering Av 4.31 385.00 76.1 80.2 105.4 109.9 3.79 50 K-12 School 89263.0 -0.7 -0.7


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPG33-3-2-3 Lincoln Middle School 522 Stevens Av 4.53 425.56 79.6 87.7 111.7 120.4 2.76 42 K-12 School 93936.0 8.0 8.0


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPF33-2-4-3 Longfellow Elementary School 432 Stevens Av 0.80 37.48 11.1 11.1 31.1 31.1 5.18 100 K-12 School 46924.0 -69.3 -69.3


Passed Not Exempt 87MFPP465-8-5-2 Lyman Moore Middle School 171 AUBURN ST K-12 School


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPG84-5-3-5 Ocean Av Elementary School 150 Ocean Av 3.64 250.34 63.3 67.9 92.1 96.9 4.97 48 K-12 School 68847.0 1.5 1.5


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPW44-6-5-8 PATHS 196 Allen Av 4.20 723.13 71.0 77.2 106.3 112.7 5.08 45 K-12 School 172173.0 4.6 4.6


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMR63+86-2-2-1-2 Peaks Island School 4 Church St 12.32 83.15 166.5 166.9 196.9 197.9 10.50 3 K-12 School 6750.0 102.9 102.9


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R4-6-5-6 Portland High School 284 Cumberland Av 2.83 752.51 48.8 53.8 73.1 78.5 3.20 76 K-12 School 266228.0 -26.3 -26.3


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPMR3-2-3-2 Presumpscot Elementary School 69 Presumpscot Street 7.03 178.79 124.6 137.2 169.4 183.2 10.68 10 K-12 School 25430.0 62.0 62.0


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2J2-4-3-3 Reiche Community School 166 Brackett Street 4.00 449.52 69.5 74.3 102.0 107.0 11.42 45 K-12 School 112346.0 4.7 4.7


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMWR1-2-2-1 Riverton School 1600 Forest Avenue 3.55 379.22 59.2 62.8 100.2 104.0 4.56 51 K-12 School 106754.0 -1.2 -1.2


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP2P+QC-1-2-1-1 Fire Museum 157 Spring St 4.13 24.76 55.6 64.8 58.5 67.8 0.26 K-12 School 6000.0 -47.8 -47.8

 Public Works Administration - Non-
 Parks, Recreation and Facilities Refrigerated
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPP83-6-4-6 Department 212 Canco 2.31 158.80 38.2 41.5 66.5 70.4 3.32 43 Warehouse 68730.0 11.5 11.5


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-3-2-2 School Administration Building 353 CUMBERLAND AVE 20.20 226.97 348.1 384.1 525.5 562.6 14.95 15 Office 11236.0 61.9 61.9

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-3-4 39 Forest Ave 39 Forest Ave 3.63 135.13 59.9 64.3 104.6 109.2 8.95 Services 37250.0 17.1 17.1

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V4-5-5-4 City Hall and Merrill Auditorium 389 Congress St 4.65 771.47 79.1 82.2 125.2 128.4 4.69 Services 165876.0 40.2 40.2

 Cummings Community Center & Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMQ82+6R-2-2-2-2 Munjoy Hill Fire Station 134 Congress St 5.40 85.55 91.1 96.9 148.4 154.5 12.19 Services 15840.0 66.2 66.2

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPJ3+PC-0-0-1-1 Evergreen Cemetery Building 672 Stevens Av 10.37 58.04 140.1 157.7 170.0 189.0 14.31 Services 5597.0 90.5 90.5




 Page 38
 Water
 Use Primary %
 Total (Location- Intensity Property Difference % Difference
 Based) GHG Total (Location- Weather Weather (All Type - Property GFA - from from
 Property Emissions Based) GHG Normalized Normalized Water ENERGY Portfolio Calculated National National
 is Part of a Intensity Emissions (Metric Site EUI Site EUI Source EUI Source EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) Tons CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Peaks Island Community Center Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMR52+8M-2-1-1-2 and Public Safety Building 129 Island Av 3.86 30.69 52.6 56.0 88.3 93.8 8.11 Services 7956.0 -1.1 -1.1

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMWJ1-3-2-4 Portland Central Kitchen 92 Waldron Way 7.92 167.70 131.0 139.3 227.4 236.1 7.18 Services 21180.0 154.7 154.7

 Portland Ocean Gateway and Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP6R1-1-1-1 Information Center 6 Commercial St 56.40 1041.52 1030.4 1030.1 1238.2 1237.2 142.95 Services 18466.0 1286.9 1286.9

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMPP93-7-4-7 Portland Public Works 250 Canco Road 3.02 243.40 51.2 56.1 81.4 86.9 3.48 Services 80713.0 -8.9 -8.9

 Other - Public
Passed Not Exempt 87MFPM4J2-2-1-1 Riverside Golf Course Clubhouse 1158 Riverside Street 4.60 46.69 69.8 72.3 156.3 158.9 31.19 Services 10154.0 75.1 75.1


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R3-4-3-4 Elm St Parking Garage 21 Elm St 0.18 23.47 2.5 2.5 6.9 7.1 0.47 Parking 172291.0

Approved
for
permanent
exemption Exempt 87MFMP3Q4-4-3-4 PARKING GARAGE 0 FREE ST Parking


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q+XW-4-4-3-4 Spring Street Parking Garage 45 Spring Street 0.40 88.66 5.6 6.0 15.3 16.3 0.22 Parking 222270.0


Passed Not Exempt 87MFMP5W1-4-4-5 Portland Police Station 109 Middle St 7.05 444.46 114.6 121.3 210.2 217.1 7.28 Police Station 63038.0 68.4 68.4

 Residential
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMXF+99-4-4-5-3 HOMELESS SERVICES CENTER 654 RIVERSIDE ST Care Facility

 Senior Living
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMMGF+QM-4-2-3-2 Barron Center 1145 Brighton Av 6.56 767.47 112.9 115.5 169.0 171.7 35.02 84 Community 117032.0 -25.5 -25.5

 Transportatio
 n
 Terminal/Stati
Passed Not Exempt 87MFJMWQ+XM-5-20-4-14 Portland International Jetport 1001 Westbrook Street 18.71 2619.68 280.9 287.8 649.6 658.5 55.56 on 140000.0 479.9 479.9

 Transportatio
 n
 Terminal/Stati
Passed Not Exempt 87MFMQ52+79-0-1-1-0 Portland Ocean Terminal 40 Commercial St 4.79 674.38 76.0 81.4 150.2 155.8 9.92 on 140798.0 34.1 34.1




 Page 39
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Refrigerated
Exempt Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+CQ-1-1-1-2 Fish Exchange 1 Portland Fish Pier Warehouse 38824.0

 Distribution
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPJ7+86-4-9-1-3 CONGDON-52 Canco 52 Canco Road 1.79 87.12 32.5 38.9 39.8 46.7 1.08 71 Center 48782.0 -33.7 -33.7

 31301101 - Fore River Medical Medical
Exempt Exempt 87MFJPX82-3-2-4 Building 195 Fore River Parkway 13.50 1022.96 188.9 189.1 522.2 522.4 4 Office 75784.0 70.0 70.0

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP94-5-4-5 10590 Woods At Canco 257 Canco Road 4.00 450.72 64.8 68.6 120.3 127.2 31 Housing 112647.0 12.9 12.9

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC81-2-0-1 409 CUMBERLAND 409 CUMBERLAND AVE 4.07 123.24 69.1 73.0 109.6 114.1 39.62 60 Housing 30310.0 -7.2 -7.2

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-3-5 Back Bay Tower 401 Cumberland Ave 1.89 432.8 28.2 30.5 66.0 70.8 14.83 100 Housing 229083.0 -48.3 -48.3

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7W1-2-0-1 BAYSIDE EAST 47 SMITH ST 2.32 48.04 40.3 42.8 58.8 61.6 23.74 99 Housing 20740.0 -47.4 -47.4

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9W+WQ-3-4-3-5 Bayview Heights 158 North Street 2.76 184.8 51.9 53.5 54.5 56.2 18.02 98 Housing 67084.0 -43.6 -43.6

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2J1-2-2-2 BUTLER PAYSON 77 PINE ST 5.20 199.09 91.4 93.6 128.2 130.3 18.55 64 Housing 38299.0 -9.5 -9.5

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXM1-3-2-2 Danforth Heights - Building A 240 Danforth Street 5.14 126.5 89.2 92.1 131.1 134.2 40.58 45 Housing 24612.0 3.1 3.1

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXP2-3-1-3 Danforth Heights - Building B 213 Danforth Heights 5.80 176.5 103.0 106.1 138.9 142.4 43.07 37 Housing 30436.0 8.7 8.7

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWP2-4-2-3 Danforth Heights - Building C 48 Salem Street 5.85 325.5 102.7 106.3 145.1 149.5 40.75 51 Housing 55604.0 -1.3 -1.3

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH6+63-2-2-1-2 deering pavilion 880 forest ave 2.89 392.50 47.3 49.2 84.8 86.7 28.06 81 Housing 135968.0 -21.4 -21.4

 Multifamily
Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFJ1-1-2-2 WESSEX WOODS APTS 7 WESSEX ST 3.79 72.37 56.2 56.2 134.4 134.4 32.97 Housing 19080.0 13.8 13.8

 Supermarke
 t/Grocery
Exempt Exempt 87MFPP369-6-7-5 2541AS - Portland, ME 91 Auburn St Ste A 12.49 788.33 195.4 202.5 402.9 410.5 19.18 70 Store 63100.0 -20.2 -20.2

 Supermarke
 t/Grocery
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP534-10-5-9 4543AS - Portland, ME 1364 Congress St 12.91 502.85 197.0 200.7 435.6 439.5 9.17 70 Store 38949.0 -19.8 -19.8

 Worship
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M+3R-2-3-2-2 State Street Church UCC 159 State Street 2.92 94.45 52.6 56.1 66.7 70.4 5.57 45 Facility 32385.0 7.1 7.1

Failed Non-
(Incomplete NEPW Logistics, Inc. (70 Refrigerated
report) Not Exempt 87MFMPP63-6-4-6 Quarry) 70 Quarry Road 1.25 112.65 21.1 24.4 34.0 37.5 84 Warehouse 90400.0 -53.9 -53.9

Failed Non-
(Incomplete NEPW Logistics, Inc. (90/118 Refrigerated
report) Not Exempt 87MFMPP73-8-3-7 Q) 90/118 Quarry Road 1.48 258.54 24.1 26.0 36.5 39.0 81 Warehouse 175000.0 -49.4 -49.4

Failed Non-
(Incomplete Refrigerated
report) Not Exempt 87MFJPWP+FV-3-5-3-5 POME 29 West Commercial St 4.91 112.99 86.6 95.7 120.3 129.9 37 Warehouse 23000.0 24.7 24.7

Failed
(Incomplete
report) Not Exempt 87MFMM3H2-3-3-4 Fancy Sauce 1945 Congress St. Building A 3.29 82.50 54.1 56.2 95.4 97.6 75 Office 25100.0 -31.2 -31.2

Failed Supermarke
(Incomplete t/Grocery
report) Not Exempt 87MFPM2J+P6-3-3-3-4 8387-Maine Mall-S Portland 415 Philbrook Avenue 11.32 560.19 174.4 179.4 375.3 380.2 12.82 69 Store 49499.0 -18.7 -18.7

 87MFMPM3+HV-10-10-10- College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 11 x Central Loop 716 Stevens Avenue ersity 254806.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP463-1-2-2 Norway Savings Bank 1200 Congress Street 7.57 218.64 122.3 124.2 228.6 230.2 5.68 40 Bank Branch 28886.0 12.5 12.5

 Bowling
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5P2-3-2-2 Bayside Bowl 58 Alder St 3.02 99.64 54.8 61.6 57.3 64.4 29.47 Alley 33000.0 -48.9 -48.9

 Abromson Community College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Education Center 88 Bedford Street 0.00 0.0 ersity 44124.0




 Page 40
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Alexander Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.02 66.73 42.0 42.0 117.7 117.5 12.57 ersity 22098.0 -34.8 -34.8

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Alumni Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 1.01 ersity 12612.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM3+2P-1-2-1-2 Blewett Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 2.94 92.91 49.0 52.0 82.4 85.6 8.15 ersity 31650.0 -54.4 -54.4

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Coleman Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.32 35.60 62.5 69.0 65.7 72.5 6.13 ersity 10718.0 -63.6 -63.6

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM4+26-1-2-1-2 College of Pharmacy 706 Stevens Avenue 11.86 550.04 200.9 209.6 322.2 331.4 5.63 ersity 46380.0 78.4 78.4

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x East Campus Bedford Street 2.99 687.53 41.6 41.6 116.4 116.4 ersity 230260.0 -35.6 -35.6

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Ginn Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 45.67 857.90 828.7 876.8 1025.1 1077.9 42.45 ersity 18783.0 467.6 467.6

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Glickman Family Library 314 Forest Avenue 2.49 314.92 46.9 48.2 49.2 50.6 1.31 ersity 126432.0 -72.7 -72.7

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Goddard Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 1.34 17.03 25.3 27.6 26.5 28.9 111.48 ersity 12696.0 -85.3 -85.3

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Hersey Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 4.53 ersity 22170.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Exempt 87MFMPM4+X4-2-5-3-5 x Innovation Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 2.83 180.24 43.5 45.4 94.2 96.3 5.73 ersity 63700.0 -47.8 -47.8

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Linnell Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 3.07 ersity 12411.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Luther Bonney Hall 85 Bedford Street 0.00 0.0 ersity 76685.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x MacDougal Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.0 ersity 15308.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6C+CC-2-2-3-2 x Maine Law Building 246 Deering Avenue 0.00 0.00 0.17 ersity 92983.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Masterton Hall 71 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 1.10 ersity 36636.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x McGoldrick Center 35 Bedford Street 3.03 127.07 57.0 60.3 59.8 63.3 16.03 ersity 42000.0 -66.9 -66.9

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM4+J3-2-3-3-2 Oral Health Center 1 College Street 8.04 323.86 117.9 120.5 289.7 292.0 29.99 ersity 40300.0 60.4 60.4

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Parker Pavilion 716 Stevens Avenue 31.08 205.10 432.6 434.5 1211.2 1216.7 ersity 6600.0 570.6 570.6

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6C+VX-2-2-2-3 x Payson Smith Hall 96 Falmouth Street 0.14 7.41 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 6.40 ersity 52516.0 -98.5 -98.5

 Placeholder Property (Bills College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x from Unknown Source) Unknown 0.00 0.00 65.20 ersity 10000.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Portland Commons Bedford Street 0.93 202.82 17.5 18.8 18.4 19.8 ersity 218000.0 -89.8 -89.8

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Proctor Hall 716 Stevens Avenue 3.31 102.90 46.1 46.1 129.1 129.1 30.69 ersity 31074.0 -28.5 -28.5

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Science Building 70 Falmouth Street 0.23 35.70 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.6 7.35 ersity 152806.0 -97.4 -97.4

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Sullivan Gym Complex 66 Foulmouth Street 0.24 14.19 4.6 4.7 4.8 5.0 6.90 ersity 58062.0 -97.3 -97.3

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x West Campus Bedford Street 3.15 1567.70 43.8 43.8 122.7 122.7 ersity 497944.0 -32.1 -32.1

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6G+H6-4-7-4-8 x Wishcamper Center 34 Bedford Street 0.00 0.26 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.17 ersity 59704.0 -100.0 -100.0

 College/Univ
In compliance Not Exempt x Woodbury Campus Center 35 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 ersity 28256.0

 CUMBERLAND COUNTY
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5W+QG-2-2-2-3 COURTHOUSE 142 FEDERAL STREET 2.91 227.25 49.8 57.0 77.4 84.9 7.74 94 Courthouse 78000.0 -60.0 -60.0




 Page 41
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM7+26-5-8-5-7 150 Read St 150 Read St 1.97 114.22 33.9 37.7 51.3 55.3 1.12 58 Center 58000.0 -14.0 -14.0

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM77-8-7-7 187-209 Read St, LLC 203 Read St 2.22 365.70 39.5 44.4 52.4 57.9 0.52 70 Center 165000.0 -31.6 -31.6

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP583-2-3-3 85 St. James Street 85 St. James Street 2.67 53.9 36.5 38.3 63.0 65.0 4.89 48 Center 20160.0 3.2 3.2

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMCG+85-8-10-11 BROSCO Portland 7 Rand Road 2.62 793.23 44.7 47.7 68.1 71.3 0.63 Center 303156.0 28.8 28.8

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPXC+67-4-3-4-3 Ferguson 33500 - Portland 172 Saint John St 2.38 135.87 40.4 43.2 64.8 67.8 0.58 67 Center 56988.0 -28.6 -28.6

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM5P2-3-3-3 Partners for World Health 40 Walch Drive 2.30 57.39 35.6 35.6 52.4 52.4 1.67 57 Center 25000.0 -12.0 -12.0

 Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPRC+P2-2-3-2-2 Sprague Operating Resources 92 Cassidy Pt Dr 0.64 144.81 8.7 9.2 18.6 19.4 1.92 Center 227594.0 -64.8 -64.8

 The Salvation Army ARC Distribution
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPQ33-4-3-5 Warehouse and Store 30 Warren Ave. 4.19 179.07 74.6 83.0 99.8 108.7 2.46 Center 42708.0 88.8 88.8

 Fitness
 Center/Heal
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7P+7W-1-2-2-2 Planet Fitness Portland 145 Marginal Way 6.38 127.69 98.4 102.5 211.5 215.9 38.28 th Club/Gym 20000.0 88.9 88.9

 Hospital
 (General
 Medical &
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP85+F7-3-6-3-6 MMC - Brighton Campus 335 Brighton Ave 10.93 2287.01 178.9 178.9 321.7 321.7 24.84 92 Surgical) 209149.0 -25.6 -25.6

 Hospital
 (General
 Medical &
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3F+7J-8-10-8-11 MMC - Portland 22 Bramhall Street 17.19 25499.71 284.8 284.3 492.1 490.7 9.87 27 Surgical) 1483216.0 12.6 12.6

 Hospital
 (General
 Medical &
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPX93-4-3-3 Northern Light Mercy Hospital 175 Fore River Parkway 20.39 4297.72 344.7 343.5 554.9 613.2 62.44 8 Surgical) 210803.0 30.8 30.8

 Hospital
 (General
 Medical &
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM353-5-2-4 Spring Harbor Hospital 123 Andover Road 14.86 1038.89 244.7 244.2 430.8 429.4 46.34 77 Surgical) 69928.0 -14.7 -14.7


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP49+46-2-1-2-1 2049-Portland 340 Park Ave. 4.27 217.04 68.9 70.0 129.2 132.3 49.45 85 Hotel 50864.0 -30.0 -30.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+JJ-2-4-3-4 86 Newbury Street Condo 5 25 Hancock Street 5.00 394.34 81.1 81.1 150.2 150.2 26.88 74 Hotel 78845.0 -19.5 -19.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3V2-3-3-3 Canopy Portland Waterfront 9 Center Street 1.58 164.79 29.3 29.3 33.2 33.2 32.05 100 Hotel 104000.0 -82.5 -82.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP45+CW-4-3-4-4 Clarion Hotel 1230 Congress st 4.20 416.29 68.2 69.3 126.2 127.4 46.78 94 Hotel 99000.0 -38.8 -38.8


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM2Q3-2-4-4 Embassy Suites by Hilton 1050 Westbrook St 6.13 631.58 99.8 100.8 182.0 183.1 74 Hotel 103048.0 -17.7 -17.7


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X+6V-2-3-3-2 HGI Portland 65 Commercial st. 5.60 428.48 90.9 92.0 167.9 168.8 51.39 79 Hotel 76472.0 -23.2 -23.2

 Hilton Garden Inn Portland
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJMXM+QP-3-4-3-3 Airport 145 Jetport Blvd. 19.21 384.11 318.3 324.3 549.2 557.6 120.59 5 Hotel 20000.0 56.2 56.2


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q+CQ-3-5-3-5 Holiday Inn By The Bay 88 Spring Street 5.78 1034.25 93.2 97.7 175.6 183.9 50.54 60 Hotel 178842.0 -7.9 -7.9

 Maple Hotel Enterprises LLC
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMGC+VQ-2-3-1-4 dba Motel 6 1 Riverside Street 1.76 78.91 32.7 32.8 36.0 36.2 113.38 100 Hotel 44944.0 -76.2 -76.2


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+CJ-4-6-3-2 Portland Downtown ME RI 145 Fore St 4.36 599.54 69.0 71.3 137.2 140.0 39.89 80 Hotel 137640.0 -25.0 -25.0

 Portland DT Waterfront ME
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMQ62+3V-3-3-2-4 ACH 158 Fore St 4.20 436.13 67.1 68.2 129.7 130.6 38.34 86 Hotel 103898.0 -31.6 -31.6


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4V+4X-2-2-3-4 Portland Harbor Hotel 468 Fore Street 9.17 498.40 149.8 155.0 270.2 279.8 67.01 2 Hotel 54376.0 91.2 91.2




 Page 42
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4W0-1-1-1 Portland ME AH 379 Commercial St 4.57 375.15 70.3 71.8 151.9 156.1 35.80 71 Hotel 82113.0 -17.0 -17.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-2-3 Portland ME HAMP 209 Fore St 4.67 332.49 74.0 75.6 146.7 148.4 70.56 74 Hotel 71206.0 -20.1 -20.1


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4W+RW-2-3-2-4 Portland Regency Inc 20 Milk Street 6.96 528.66 113.6 117.1 205.5 213.0 98.84 59 Hotel 76000.0 -6.6 -6.6


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+HF-1-3-2-2 The Press Hotel 119 Exchange St 6.21 518.50 100.9 103.9 185.3 188.9 49.71 55 Hotel 83506.0 -4.3 -4.3

 Westin Portland Harborview
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4P+47-5-8-7-7 Hotel 157 High Street 5.84 1485.31 95.8 98.0 171.1 173.4 31.44 66 Hotel 254268.0 -12.9 -12.9


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWH+CQ-1-2-2-2 16 Storer Street 16 Storer Street 1.28 94.31 21.8 22.8 34.0 35.0 1.86 100 K-12 School 73799.0 -68.0 -68.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWJ+PH-2-2-1-3 64 Emery Street 64 Emery Street 3.07 131.32 52.4 54.8 81.9 84.7 4.72 81 K-12 School 42779.0 -31.5 -31.5


In compliance Not Exempt x Breakwater Learning 856 Brighton Ave. 0.00 0.0 K-12 School 35986.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFP+29-2-2-1-2 x Brick 858 Brighton Ave. 3.25 69.11 57.0 59.3 80.3 82.7 12.57 68 K-12 School 21288.0 -17.8 -17.8


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPHF+W3-2-2-9-6 Cheverus High School 267 Ocean Ave 3.88 406.46 66.7 73.9 101.5 109.7 32.12 54 K-12 School 104761.0 -3.9 -3.9


In compliance Not Exempt 884 x Gym 856 Brighton Ave. 5.55 50.78 75.4 77.6 108.1 110.7 5.39 62 K-12 School 9145.0 -12.6 -12.6


In compliance Not Exempt 856 x Jessie 856 Brighton Ave. 4.27 23.72 57.9 59.6 66.8 68.4 5.90 93 K-12 School 5553.0 -48.5 -48.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP47+R8-11-14-10-12 Lyman Moore Middle School 171 Auburn St 4.33 704.62 77.1 84.7 103.2 111.4 6.03 48 K-12 School 162669.0 1.8 1.8


In compliance Not Exempt x Abplanalp Library 716 Stevens Avenue 0.00 0.00 9.30 Library 26636.0

 Manufacturi
 500 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM7V3-3-3-4 500 Riverside - 500 Building Parkway 7.83 269.51 118.9 122.9 266.8 271.1 5.83 Plant 34400.0

 Manufacturi
 525 Riverside - 520/540 524 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM8W3-3-3-3 Building Parkway 6.66 345.96 104.0 106.1 215.3 217.0 9.28 Plant 51952.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+5J-5-4-6-4 Barber Foods, LLC 70 St. John Street 32.98 4823.06 518.0 522.0 1055.0 1059.2 220.76 Plant 146233.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM3J2-4-2-4 Designtex Portland 14 Industrial Way 3.63 145.13 57.1 59.6 115.5 118.0 0.58 Plant 40000.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM5P+4G-2-3-2-2 Immucell 56 Evergreen Drive 22.31 800.85 335.3 341.7 772.6 787.5 130.68 Plant 35896.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJMX5+VM-6-8-5-10 Nichols Portland LLC 2400 Congress Street 29.75 5949.82 454.9 456.1 999.7 1001.0 22.63 Plant 200000.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7G+H7-5-8-4-7 Oakhurst Dairy 364 Forest Avenue 33.75 2860.02 467.7 471.0 964.0 966.0 395.26 Plant 84730.0

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM6V+VG-2-5-3-4 unifirst corp 430 riverside ind. prkwy 20.02 984.20 362.7 377.8 451.9 468.9 208.38 Plant 49149.0

 Medical
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP2G+JH-1-2-1-2 216 Vaughan Street 216 Vaughan Street 6.94 195.84 119.6 122.6 180.7 183.7 10.24 47 Office 28220.0 1.6 1.6

 Medical
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6X+P2-1-2-2-2 272 Congress Street 272 Congress Street 5.32 111.64 86.0 90.0 160.1 166.3 6.46 57 Office 21000.0 -6.1 -6.1

 Medical
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP452-3-2-4 Eye Venture Associates 53 Sewall St 12.89 335.62 206.3 205.6 397.5 395.5 23.92 37 Office 26030.0 10.6 10.6

 Medical
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP382-2-1-3 Maine Eye Center 15 Lowell Street 3.82 129.88 60.8 62.9 119.1 121.2 8.00 Office 34000.0 -48.8 -48.8




 Page 43
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Medical
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7H2-3-2-2 Northern Light Health 43 Baxter Blvd 2.29 56.19 35.1 36.6 76.9 78.5 6.89 100 Office 24524.0 -73.6 -73.6

 Mixed Use
Exempt Not Exempt Parking Garage 88 Bedford Street 0.00 0.00 0.31 Property 386681.0

 Children's Museum and
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP252-2-2-1 Theatre of Maine 250 Thompson's Point Road 4.10 122.87 62.4 63.3 138.5 139.9 18.95 Museum 40000.0 23.7 23.7

 Non-
 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPQR1-1-1-1 165 Presumpscot 165 Presumpscot St 0.28 12.16 3.8 4.0 10.7 11.1 2.84 Warehouse 44100.0 -79.7 -79.7

 Non-
 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQC+4G-3-3-2-4 Building 2 344 Riverside St 1.50 19.19 26.0 28.3 38.4 40.9 70.13 72 Warehouse 12800.0 -35.5 -35.5

 Non-
 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM73-7-3-7 NEPW Logistics, Inc. (Read) 182-184 Read Street 2.20 169.05 39.4 43.7 50.8 55.3 0.41 82 Warehouse 77000.0 -50.0 -50.0

 Non-
 376 Riverside Industrial Pa Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPM6V+F9-3-6-3-6 NU Portland Facility rkway 2.97 192.24 47.1 50.2 92.9 96.1 1.21 60 Warehouse 64759.0 -15.0 -15.0

 Non-
 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPF+RR-2-2-3-1 Pine Tree Paper Co 633 Warren Ave 0.41 8.26 5.7 6.0 16.1 16.8 0.00 97 Warehouse 20000.0 -80.2 -80.2

 #1208 - Thompson's Point -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP25+F9-2-5-2-5 Brick South 8 Thompsons Point Road 6.70 187.68 118.6 125.1 162.2 168.9 3.75 7 Office 28000.0 99.3 99.3


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q+JW-1-2-1-2 307-9 CUMBERLAND AVE 307 CUMBERLAND AVE 2.97 76.07 50.4 53.5 80.0 83.5 2.81 82 Office 25650.0 -39.6 -39.6

 Cianbro (Ricker's Wharf
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPF+W8-1-3-2-3 Facility) 60 Cassidy Point Drive 3.13 68.64 47.8 50.4 105.9 110.2 4.11 62 Office 21901.0 -15.1 -15.1


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM272-4-3-4 Congress Street LLC 2331 Congress Street 5.85 128.80 101.2 105.2 151.2 155.5 18.56 49 Office 22000.0 0.6 0.6


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3P2-2-1-1 Julia Welsh 619 Congress St 1.48 35.77 27.4 31.1 30.9 34.7 3.73 100 Office 24187.0 -78.8 -78.8


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4V2-1-2-2 ME EMPLOYERS MUTUAL 19 Cross St. 4.25 249.50 59.1 61.6 165.6 172.5 2.97 57 Office 58737.0 -9.5 -9.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP67+WM-6-3-6-3 PWD Admin Facility 225 Douglass St. 6.63 430.82 111.8 116.6 181.7 186.7 6.14 49 Office 65000.0 0.7 0.7


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM2C4-7-3-7 Unum Portland, ME Campus 2211 Congress Street 4.35 3128.96 70.3 73.0 131.5 134.4 8.79 Office 719458.0 13.0 13.0


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM274-4-1-4 Woodard & Curran 41 Hutchins Drive 4.44 255.60 75.8 78.6 118.3 121.2 0.69 Office 60144.0 1.6 1.6


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMR92-3-1-2 101 McAlister Farm Road 101 McAlister Farm Road 3.89 81.23 63.0 67.0 117.4 121.8 7.55 Other 20860.0 31.5 31.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMM92-3-2-4 238 Riverside 238 Riverside Street 1.28 46.65 20.3 22.3 40.6 42.8 1.24 Other 36340.0 -54.5 -54.5


In compliance Not Exempt Building G 100 West Commercial Street 2.86 57.25 45.6 47.7 53.1 55.2 4.26 Other 20000.0 -40.5 -40.5


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPC+M8-2-2-2-2 Hammond Lumber Company 300 Riverside Street 1.60 35.20 29.7 35.3 33.1 39.0 4.22 Other 22000.0 -62.9 -62.9


In compliance Not Exempt x Wayneflete Rowing 100 West Commercial Street 0.28 0.57 3.9 4.0 11.0 11.1 4.26 Other 2000.0 -87.6 -87.6

 Other -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPPM+M4-1-2-2-2 Glickman Academy 587 Ocean Ave 4.29 92.70 74.5 81.6 109.2 116.8 5.72 Education 21624.0 -1.0 -1.0

 Other -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+56-3-4-4-5 Monument Square 5 Monument Square 2.04 166.47 38.3 41.2 40.2 43.3 4.25 Education 81770.0 -63.5 -63.5

 Other -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPC4+G3-1-1-1-0 PPL Burbank 337 Stevens Avenue 2.13 14.60 36.3 38.1 56.6 59.3 10.78 Education 6870.0 -48.7 -48.7


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP6P3-4-3-2 127 MW 127 marginal way 0.06 1.60 0.9 0.9 2.1 2.3 1.44 Other - Mall 27554.0 -99.1 -99.1

 Other -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4M+JR-3-4-3-3 YMCA of Southern Maine 70 Forest Avenue 6.73 660.63 120.0 125.6 159.2 165.1 24.88 Recreation 98180.0 42.1 42.1




 Page 44
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Other -
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPVM+PW-4-15-3-15 Portland Yacht Services 100 West Commercial Street 4.45 384.91 68.5 71.1 120.0 123.5 12.50 Services 86400.0 23.9 23.9


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-2-3 PARKING GARAGE 142 FEDERAL STREET 0.30 34.56 4.1 4.1 11.6 11.6 0.00 94 Parking 118760.0 -60.0 -60.0

 Performing
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP4R+JC-2-2-2-2 121 Center Street 121 Center Street 6.88 198.81 114.4 120.6 195.3 202.1 10.22 Arts 28885.0 74.4 74.4

 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQJ+F5-4-7-5-8 029 513 Warren Ave 0.00 0.00 124.9 131.0 275.6 283.2 4.04 17 Warehouse 104710.0 82.2 82.2

 Refrigerated
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM8+72-4-7-4-9 10573002 - Portland 165 Read Street 3.33 653.77 49.1 49.0 118.7 118.6 37.38 77 Warehouse 196599.0 -42.7 -42.7

 Salvation Army Adult Residential
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5P1-2-0-1 Rehabilitation Center 98 Preble Street 6.36 151.51 105.6 112.9 181.1 188.8 26.71 Care Facility 23826.0 68.4 68.4


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPPR2-2-2-2 145 Presumpscot Store 145 Presumpscot St 1.68 36.21 23.3 23.4 65.3 65.5 3.46 95 Retail Store 21600.0 -52.7 -52.7


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMPG+75-5-5-7-6 2401 - PORTLAND 245 RIVERSIDE STREET 4.52 483.50 75.6 81.3 126.2 132.3 6.22 79 Retail Store 107085.0 -29.4 -29.4


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQJ+2W-3-3-2-3 Branch 616 - Portland, ME 425 Warren Ave 2.77 73.12 49.1 54.5 67.1 73.0 0.00 61 Retail Store 26357.0 -11.2 -11.2


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5X+7C-1-2-2-3 Hub Furniture Co 291 Fore St 1.05 36.65 18.0 20.1 27.5 29.7 0.68 98 Retail Store 35000.0 -60.1 -60.1


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMM29+R2-3-3-1-3 Ruth's Reusable Resources 39 Blueberry Rd 1.82 49.07 28.5 28.7 37.9 38.4 0.55 95 Retail Store 27000.0 -48.6 -48.6

 Self-Storage
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMJC3-4-2-4 3697-Portland - Riverside St 150 Riverside St 0.91 69.54 15.1 16.3 25.8 27.1 0.09 Facility 76527.0 -46.0 -46.0

 Social/Meeti
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP3P+7W-2-2-1-3 Cumberland Club 116 High St 8.65 172.97 150.8 158.9 218.2 227.3 15.53 ng Hall 20000.0 99.1 99.1

 Supermarke
 t/Grocery
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7R+9H-4-6-3-4 10291-PTL Portland Bayside 2 Somerset Street 18.85 1056.84 299.3 308.5 590.6 600.4 39.40 Store 56059.0 33.0 33.0

 Supermarke
 JPQX+4V South Portland, t/Grocery
In compliance Not Exempt Maine 8279-Portland, ME 50 Cottage Road 12.48 540.05 191.1 198.8 418.5 426.6 16.40 62 Store 43268.0 -12.6 -12.6

 Supermarke
 t/Grocery
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP7J+CJ-4-9-3-7 8351-Portland Forest Ave. 295 Forest Avenue 13.21 938.21 195.9 203.5 468.1 476.3 6.41 51 Store 71011.0 -1.9 -1.9

 Urgent
 Care/Clinic/
 Other
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFJPVJ2-4-3-4 Portland VA CBO 141 West Commercial Street 11.24 772.03 186.3 190.7 321.1 325.9 8.57 Outpatient 68710.0 120.3 120.3

 Vehicle
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQF+G9-2-4-3-3 Moose LLC 375 Riverside Street 3.02 79.25 48.9 53.0 90.2 94.7 5.35 72 Dealership 26285.0 -20.7 -20.7

 Vehicle
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFH+9R-4-3-3-4 Quirk Chevrolet 1000 Brighton Ave 1.97 110.52 30.1 30.6 66.5 67.1 2.57 95 Dealership 56000.0 -48.3 -48.3

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt x Building A 100 West Commercial Street 0.22 4.31 3.1 3.2 8.8 8.9 2.22 Services 19200.0 -91.0 -91.0

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt x Building B 100 West Commercial Street 4.08 117.37 60.8 62.7 117.4 120.0 11.83 Services 28800.0 21.2 21.2

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt x Building C 100 West Commercial Street 2.00 43.22 32.6 34.2 59.3 61.4 6.50 Services 21600.0 -38.8 -38.8

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt x Building D 100 West Commercial Street 4.87 23.38 81.2 85.0 137.4 141.3 18.26 Services 4800.0 41.8 41.8

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt x Building E 100 West Commercial Street 6.87 82.48 108.9 112.9 133.4 137.7 17.05 Services 12000.0 37.7 37.7




 Page 45
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Vehicle
 Repair
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPHW+WR-3-3-4-4 Maine Yacht Center 100 Kensington Street 2.70 133.11 40.5 43.4 75.7 78.6 12.80 Services 49300.0 -21.8 -21.8

 Vehicle
 Moody's Collision Centers Repair
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPXR2-2-2-3 Portland 495 Presumpscot St 19.85 223.35 268.9 287.0 344.6 362.7 12.67 Services 11250.0 255.7 255.7

 Vehicle
 Portland Commerce Center - Repair
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMQM+5V-3-2-4-1 Safelite 421 Warren Ave 3.06 82.20 51.5 55.0 84.8 88.6 43.78 Services 26840.0 -12.5 -12.5

 Wholesale
 Club/Superc
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMMFG+4M-4-9-5-9 LOWES 37 RAND RD 4.05 469.5 65.8 68.5 120.8 123.7 3.94 83 enter 115928.0 -31.6 -31.6

 First Baptist Church in Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPRC+36-3-3 Portland 360 Canco rd 2.14 60.7 37.9 42.1 52.3 57.1 1.35 93 Facility 28327.0 -46.2 -46.2

 First Lutheran Church & Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP35+XR-2-3-2-2 Children's Programs 132 Auburn St 3.50 87.62 47.7 52.2 61.2 66.0 6.47 69 Facility 25011.0 -23.9 -23.9

 Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+CM-2-2-1-2 First Parish Church 425 Congress Street 2.33 41.06 40.8 45.5 57.7 63.6 8.08 41 Facility 17637.0 13.6 13.6

 Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFPP83+WQ-2-3-1-2 Grace Baptist Church 476 Summit Street 9.73 46.10 132.2 141.1 176.3 188.9 5.84 Facility 4737.0 201.8 201.8

 Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMP88+8F-2-4-2-4 Temple Beth El 400 Deering Avenue 3.89 84.36 67.8 72.8 98.5 103.6 11.34 41 Facility 21674.0 12.4 12.4

 Woodfords Congregational Worship
In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPC6+6W-2-1-2-1 Church 202 Woodford Street 1.95 85.66 26.6 26.6 36.3 36.3 664.03 79 Facility 44000.0 -43.6 -43.6


In compliance Not Exempt 87MFMPM3+4J-3-8-3-3 x HERSEY 714 STEVENS AVE

 The Cathedral Church of St.
In compliance Not Exempt Luke 143 State Street 3.31 107.04 59.7 65.6 75.3 81.9 32386.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMHC+RR-5-10-2-3 Fireside Portland 81 Riverside St 4.72 536.05 75.8 144.9 214.26 83 Hotel 113493.0 -26.4 -26.4

 Financial
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3Q2-3-3-3 Baxter 562 Congress st 2.37 251.30 41.4 44.3 59.7 62.6 4.53 Office 105872.0 -48.7 -48.7

 Manufacturi
 Douglas Bros. Division-Robert 423 Riverside Industrial ng/Industrial
Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM7W+26-2-3-4-3 Mitchell Co., Inc. Parkway 2.38 67.17 40.4 64.6 1.99 Plant 28200.0

 APEX Fitness & Racket Center Other -
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM25+JR-3-4-4-4 LLC 2445 Congress St 1.43 117.41 20.4 53.9 0.01 Recreation 82000.0 -51.9 -51.9


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7Q2-3-2-3 161 MW 161 marginal way 8.26 453.62 153.7 158.3 170.4 175.3 43.70 Other - Mall 54922.0 -24.4 -24.4


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPR53-2-1-2 7TH DAY ADVENTISTS 97 ALLEN AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPP3-3-4-2 APPLICATOR SALES 400 WARREN AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPM3-3-3-2 APPLICATORS SALE 420 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-4-3-3 ARCADIA 504 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMMF+6Q-3-3-2-2 BERLIN CITY LEXUS/TOYOTA 191 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPP287-7-11-8 CALL CENTER BLDG 75 NORTHPORT DR


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4R+67-4-7-5-7 CIVIC CENTER 82 FREE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+9X-3-3-2-3 COZY HARBOR 75 ST JOHN ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6R+XX-4-6-4-5 E W NOYES & SONS 127 OXFORD ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRC+36-3-3-2-4 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 326 CANCO RD




 Page 46
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPXC2-3-2-4 GOULET SUPPLY 151 ST JOHN ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP49+F3-3-3-2-2 H.P. HOOD & SONS 349 PARK AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMQF4-5-3-6 HARVEY IND. 405 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2V0-1-1-1 HOBSON'S PIER 390 COMMERCIAL ST

 HOLMES DISTRIBUTOR /
Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4Q3-4-3-3 HORIZON 230 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-2-2-1 KINKO'S 50 MONUMENT SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQ8+3X-8-9-8-7 L L BEAN 765 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQM2-5-3-4 LEX CONNECTION 429 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-1-3 MACHIAS BANK/O BAG 193 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJMXG+JP-3-4-3-4 MAINE LOBSTER NOW 52 CITY LINE DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ93-4-3-5 ME DMV & DEP 298 CANCO RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q+FG-2-2-1-1 MECHANICS HALL 519 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMM283-4-4-4 MPX/SFX 2301 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMRF3-4-2-4 MSN / ME TPK SVC CTR 400 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9F2-4-3-4 NEXCYCLE / ROOF SPECIALIST/ 80 PINE TREE IND PKWY


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM7V+4J-2-5-3-4 PAUL WHITE TILE CO 446 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY

 Ambulatory
 Surgical
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP453-3-3-4 ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOC 33 SEWALL ST Center 54000.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+93-2-3-1-3 Cow Plaza Hotel LLC 433 Fore Street 46.16 Hotel 80189.0

 Non-
 Refrigerated
Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3M+FX-6-5-5-4 006881-Portland ME 125 Industrial Way Warehouse 100000.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM9W+6Q-2-4-3-4 FAIRPOINT COMUNICATION 5 DAVIS FARM RD Office 80683.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-2-3-4 PARKING DECK 468 FORE ST Parking 61650.0

 Residential
Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4J+4C-1-1-1-2 899 Riverside St Campus 899 Riverside St 0.00 0.0 Care Facility 25688.0

 Residential
Exempt Exempt Bigelow 899 Riverside St Care Facility 12460.0

 Residential
Exempt Exempt Kineo 899 Riverside St Care Facility 9180.0

 Residential
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPV9+QX-6-7-6-7 ST JOSEPHS MANOR 136 RAY ST Care Facility 88000.0

 Residential
Exempt Exempt Sue Wright House 899 Riverside St Care Facility 4576.0

 Vehicle
Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQR+53-2-1-1-1 O'CONNORS MOTOR CO 279 WARREN AVE Dealership 33710.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+FJ-1-2-2-2 #1 FREE ST CONDO 10 FREE ST




 Page 47
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V2-5-2-5 1 CITY CENTER 1 CITY CTR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMVC1-2-2-3 1 OF 3 470 RIVERSIDE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P4-5-2-4 10 CONGRESS ST PLAZA 10 CONGRESS SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ633-6-4-5 100 FORE ST 100 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P3-2-3-6 100 STATE STREET 100 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPJ61-2-2-1 1025 FOREST AVE 1025 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMGH3-1-4-5 1041 SHOPPING PLAZA 1041 BRIGHTON AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P2-3-1-2 117 LOFTS 117 PREBLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJPVF1-2-1-1 121 CASSIDY POINT 121 CASSIDY PT RD

 17 CARLETON STREET
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2H1-1-2-1 APARTMENTS 17 CARLETON ST

 178 KENNEBEC CONDO UNIT
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5M1-2-1-2 #2 178 KENNEBEC ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMMC1-3-2-4 190 RIVERSIDE PLAZA 190 RIVERSIDE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V+PP-2-2-1-2 2 CANAL PLAZA 2 CANAL PLAZA


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V1-1-1-1 2 CITY CENTER 2 CITY CTR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R2-3-2-3 2 MONUMENT SQUARE 2 MONUMENT SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-3-3-3 2 PORTLAND SQUARE 2 PORTLAND SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W2-2-1-1 217 COMMERCIAL ST 217 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+MW-1-2-2-2 22 FREE ST 22 FREE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3H1-1-2-2 27 UNIT 553 CUMBERLAND AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-2-2-2 3 CANAL PLAZA 3 CANAL PLAZA


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPF71-3-1-2 3 PLEASANT AVE 3 PLEASANT AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP51-2-1-1 4 APARTMENTS 78 BELL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-2-2-3 40 FREE ST 28 FREE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+9F-2-2-1-2 45 FOREST AVE APARTMENTS 45 FOREST AVE

 482 CONGRESS HAZY HILL
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-3-2-2 FARMS 482 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ521-2-1-2 5 INDIA STREET 5 INDIA ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q3-4-3-3 511 PLAZA 511 CONGRESS ST

 53 DANFORTH STREET
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R2-2-2-1 APARTMENTS 53 DANFORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7V1-2-2-2 58 BOYD STREET 58 BOYD ST




 Page 48
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2Q2-2-1-2 66 STATE ST 66 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+77-1-2-1-2 75 MARKET STREET 75 MARKET ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V1-3-2-3 89 ANDERSON ST 89 ANDERSON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+R8-1-1-1-2 ABACUS / KENNEDY STUDIO 44 EXCHANGE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMVG+X9-1-2-1-1 ADT 563 RIVERSIDE ST

 ALLAGASH BREWING
Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3M+F9-2-2-2-3 COMPANY INDUSTRIAL WAY 1265.95


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM5Q3-4-2-5 ALLSIDE 78 WALCH DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+8R-1-2-1-2 ANDROSCOGGIN BANK 130 MIDDLE ST

 ARTEMISIA CAFE/ ART
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R3-3-2-2 STUDIOS 59 PLEASANT ST

 ASIAN BISTRO/YOGURT
Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFF7-5-9-4 VALLEY 1140 BRIGHTON AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6M+GP-1-2-1-2 AT & T MOBILITY 49 MARGINAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ422-3-2-3 ATLANTIC TRAWLER 68 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+GQ-3-3-4-6 ATRIUM 640 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP31-2-2-2 AVESTA BISHOP STREET 72 BISHOP ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8X2-2-1-2 AVESTA HOUSING 58 NORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-3-2 BANGOR SAVINGS OFFICE 280 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6Q5-7-4-6 BAXTER ACADEMY 185 LANCASTER ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V2-2-2-3 BAXTER PLACE 305 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R2-2-2-3 BAYSIDE MAINE 645 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7M3-5-3-4 BAYSIDE MEDICAL BLDG 84 MARGINAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7H+G2-2-3-2-2 BAYVIEW COURT APTS 331 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt currently unavailable BIRCH MEADOW APTS 237 WOODFORD ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPC+36-1-5-5-5 BIRCHWOOD 217 CANCO RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2G0-2-1-2 BOWDOIN DEVELOPMENT 135 CHADWICK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP25+JQ-3-4-2-4 BRICK NORTH 4 THOMPSONS POINT


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W+M3-1-2-2-2 BROWNE TRADING MARKET 260 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM7W+PH-3-3-3-4 BUILDERS INSULATION 511 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-4-3-4 BURNHAM APARTMENTS 633 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4M1-1-1-2 BURNHAM TOWERS APTS 419 CUMBERLAND AVE




 Page 49
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH6+JR-2-3-2-4 CARAVAN BEADS 915 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3H1-1-1-1 CARLETON APTS 84 CARLETON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P1-2-2-2 CARLETON COURT 145 SPRING ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRV2-2-2-2 CASCO BAY REFINISHING 273 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X1-2-2-2 CASCO VARIETY 94 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+GP-1-2-1-3 CELLARDOOR WINERY 131 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-3-3-4 CENTER CITY PLAZA 510 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P+P7-2-3-1-2 CHURCH 156 HIGH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R1-1-2-2 CLAPP MEMORIAL BLDG 443 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P2-2-2-2 COFFEE BY DESIGN/ LAZZARI 616 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V3-4-3-5 COFFEE BY DESIGN/ YOUNGS 11 DIAMOND ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+FX-1-1-1-1 COMMUNIQUES 5 MOULTON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P3-4-2-3 CONGRESS BLDG 142 HIGH ST

 COURT SQUARE,
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W2-3-1-3 ANTHOPOLOGIE 66 PEARL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V3-2-3-2 COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT 311 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXR2-2-1-2 CUMBERLAND PARK PLACE 447 CUMBERLAND AVE

 CYCLE MANIA/ANGELA
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9V3-3-3-4 ADAMS 170 ANDERSON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2R1-2-1-2 DANFORTH ON HIGH 81 DANFORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+48-1-1-1-2 DAVID WOOD CLOTHING 225 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R0-1-1-1 DAVIDS / COFFEE BY DESIGN 22 MONUMENT SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J2-3-1-3 DEERING PLACE 609 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6V2-3-2-2 DEERING PLACE BLDG A 61 DEERING ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP461-2-2-3 DERMATOLOGY ASSO. 50 SEWALL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQQ2-3-2-2 DRAKE EQUIPMENT 160 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMPP3-6-3-2 DSI-GARAGE DOORS 380 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPP61-2-1-1 EEC 57 BELL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2Q2-1-1-2 ELM TERRACE 68 HIGH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ931-2-1-2 EMERSON 13 EMERSON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-1-1-2 EQUALITY MAINE 15 CASCO ST




 Page 50
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X1-2-2-3 EVIE CIANCHETTE BLOCK 145 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPP29+98-6-4-1-4 FALLBROOK WOODS 60 MERRYMEETING DR


Exempt Not Exempt 87MFMM36+JW-2-4-2-4 FEDERAL EXPRESS 95 HUTCHINS DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2C4-3-4-2 FIRST ATLANTIC BLDG 222 ST JOHN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W2-2-1-1 FITZ & BENNETT HOME 5 MILK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W1-2-1-2 FL PUTMAN 5 WIDGERY WHARF


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP272-2-1-2 FORE RIVER APARTMENTS 57 FREDERIC ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4M1-2-1-2 FOREST AVE PLAZA 449 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4Q+4G-2-3-2-3 FORM SYSTEMS 200 RIVERSIDE IND PKWY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3P1-1-1-0 FRANKLIN TOWERS 61 WILMOT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMM5V2-3-2-4 FRESENIUS MEDICAL CENTER 1600 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ623-4-3-3 GATEWAY GARAGE 167 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-3-2-4 GOVERNMENT CENTER 81 PREBLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-1-1-2 GROSS CONFECTION BAR 57 EXCHANGE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMRP32-3-1-2 GYM 78 MCKINLEY CT


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3W+WC-5-3-5-4 HALCYON ORGANICS 65 MILLIKEN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ2+2F-2-4-2-3 HAPPY TAILS/ BRACKETT WEST 115 BISHOP ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWM3-4-2-3 HARBOR TERRACE 284 DANFORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJPXQ2-2-1-2 HARBORSIDE APARTMENTS 41 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+7V-3-3-3-4 HOFFMAN CENTER 630 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3G2-2-2-2 HOLT HALL 794 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+CR-2-2-1-2 HOLY DONUTS 4 MOULTON ST

 HUGOS/EVENTIDE/HONEY
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X1-2-1-2 POT 80 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPP650-1-1-2 HUNTINGTON NORTH 326 AUBURN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4P+65-1-3-2-2 IMMUCELL 201 INDUSTRIAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4F2-3-1-2 IRIS PARK APARTMENTS 191 PARK AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9V2-3-1-3 JJ RITTER/INDIGO ART 50 COVE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M3-2-3-2 JOES VARIETY 667 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+GF-1-2-1-1 JOHN D CARROLL BLOCK 136 COMMERCIAL ST




 Page 51
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-3-2-2 LAFAYETTE SQUARE APT 638 CONGRESS ST

 LEAVITT & PARRIS/ OTTOS
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPM65-3-6-4 PIZZA 250 READ ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9C+78-2-3-2-3 LEEWARD 516 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+G2-1-2-1-1 LEROUX KITCHEN 161 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP7P4-5-2-6 LINDEN 132 MARGINAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-1-1-2 LIO REST./ STYLE ME 6 CITY CTR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W2-2-2-2 LIQUID RIOT 250 COMMERCIAL ST

 LOCAL 188/NORTHEAST
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J1-1-2-2 PATIENT 685 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M4-2-2-2 LONGFELLOW COMMONS 681 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMGG+Q3-4-4-3-4 LORING HOUSE 1125 BRIGHTON AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMM6V2-2-2-2 MAINE ORTHOPEDICS 1599 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQR3-5-4-4 MAINE YACHT CENTER 197 PRESUMPSCOT ST

 MARION BLDG / JOHNS
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+54-1-2-2-2 MANVILLE 31 PEARL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH3-4-2-4 MARTIN POINT 32 RAINBOW MALL RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R2-2-1-2 MASONIC BLDG 415 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P5-8-7-7 ME MED PARKING GARAG 173 HIGH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P2-3-2-3 MECA 380 CUMBERLAND AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMM3J+CJ-2-3-1-2 MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1945 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-1-1-1 MIDDLE ST TOWER 100 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X2-3-2-2 MIDDLE STREET APARTMENTS 83 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMP92-3-2-4 MILTON RENTALS 750 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPM1-1-2-2 MOTHERHOUSE 605 STEVENS AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W1-1-2-2 MSRC 30 UNION WHARF


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8R4-5-4-6 MULTI TENANT 34 DIAMOND ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-1-1 MULTI TENANT 97 EXCHANGE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ41-2-1-2 MULTI TENANT RETAIL 1190 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMRF3-3-2-2 MULTI TENANTED 460 RIVERSIDE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWP2-5-2-6 MULTI TENANTED 65 W COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P2-3-2-3 MULTI TENANTED 101 HANOVER ST




 Page 52
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM3H2-4-2-3 MULTI TENANTED 1 INDUSTRIAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPF41-1-1-2 MULTIPLE TENANTS 197 PLEASANT AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3V2-2-2-2 NETWORK SYSTEMS 14 YORK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPPR5-7-5-3 NEW ENGLAND ORGANIC 125 PRESUMPSCOT ST

 NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+FC-3-4-2-3 BUILDING 55 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q3-5-3-5 NEW GREEN LIGHT STUDIO 45 DARTMOUTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM4W+P9-6-8-6-9 NEW WAREHOUSE 56 MILLIKEN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6X2-3-2-3 NORTH SCHOOL 248 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M1-1-1-1 NORTHGATE 231 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPP362-2-1-1 NORTHGATE OFFICE MLL 94 AUBURN ST

 NOVA SEAFOODS / DAVES
Exempt Exempt 87MFJPWQ3-3-2-4 AUTO 555 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R+RQ-1-3-2-2 NURA 1 MONUMENT WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q1-3-2-2 OAK STREET LOFTS 72 OAK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC81-1-2-2 ODD FELLOWS BLDG 651 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+85-1-2-1-2 OLD PORT SANDWICH SHOP 77 MARKET ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+XP-2-2-1-3 OLD PORT SEAGRILL 7 CUSTOM HOUSE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+HW-1-1-1-2 OLD PORT TAVERN BILLIARDS 366 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V1-1-0-0 ONE CANAL PLAZA 1 CANAL PLAZA


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R+3M-1-2-2-2 ONE MONUMENT SQUARE 1 MONUMENT SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQJ+FX-1-3-2-3 OSHER INN 620 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2R0-1-1-0 PARKING GARAGE 27 HIGH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X3-3-2-4 PARKING GARAGE/REGISTRY 25 PEARL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R1-2-2-2 PEARL PLACE II APARTMENTS 184 PEARL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4V2-3-2-3 PEOPLES HERITAGE BANK 1 PORTLAND SQ


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P+6P-1-2-2-3 PERFORMING ARTS CNTR 25 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMR9+8G-2-3-1-3 PHARMERICA EAST 97 MCALISTER FARM RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W+HV-1-2-1-3 PHENIX TITLE / HARRIMAN 121 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3W4-4-3-3 PIERCE ATWOOD 252 COMMERCIAL ST

 PLAY IT AGAIN/MAINE
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP9R2-2-3-3 RUNNING 315 MARGINAL WAY




 Page 53
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q+4F-1-2-1-1 PORTLAND DATA CENTER 338 CUMBERLAND AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6X2-2-2-3 PORTLAND FOOD CO-OP 290 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+6F-1-1-1-2 PORTLAND GREEN GROCR 211 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2V1-1-1-2 PORTLAND YACHT SERVICES 400 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6M+6P-3-5-3-4 POST OFFICE MNTNANCE 171 KENNEBEC ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V2-5-3-6 POST OFFICE SQUARE 396 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q4-4-3-3 POWER PAY/PUBLIC MARKET 320 CUMBERLAND AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP77+39-1-1-1-1 PRINCETON VILLAGE 7 ELIZABETH RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-2-1-1 PRIOR TD BANK SPACE 477 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W1-0-0-1 PROCTOR BLDG 9 EXCHANGE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ22-2-3-4 RAIA BUSINESS CMPLX 54 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPM6+HW-2-5-2-5 READ ST SELF STORAGE 217 READ ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQ31-1-1-1 REICHHOLD PLASMINE 33 BISHOP ST

 RESIDENCES AT MERCY
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P3-4-3-4 HOSPITAL 120 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W3-4-3-4 REST/PARKING GARAGE 425 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3M2-2-2-1 RICE TRELAWN BLDG 655 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V+52-3-4-4-4 RISING TIDE/AUSTIN STREET 109 FOX ST

 ROCKINGHAM/THREE OF
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V+Q4-4-5-4-3 STRONG 35 DIAMOND ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPHQ+X2-4-6-5-7 SEASIDE PARTNERSHIP 850 BAXTER BLVD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4C+2C-2-2-2-3 SHALOM HOUSE 106 GILMAN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-2-2 SILVER STREET DEVELOPMENT 4 MILK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X2-1-0-2 SIMON PIERCE 111 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8X6-5-6-5 SMRT 59 WASHINGTON AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5V1-2-2-2 SONNY'S 85 EXCHANGE ST

 STARBUCKS COFFEE /
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5W1-2-1-1 STONEWALL 178 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W1-2-1-2 STORAGE BLDG. 450 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q+32-3-3-2-3 STRAND BLDG. 565 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMM5Q2-2-2-2 STROUDWATER CROSSING 1685 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMFF7-7-7-6 SULLIVAN TIRE 1110 BRIGHTON AVE




 Page 54
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRR3-2-3-3 TALUS/GRIME STUDIO 299 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-2-1-2 THE AMBASSADOR 37 CASCO ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q1-2-1-1 THE EARL 341 CUMBERLAND AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5R1-2-2-2 THE METROPOLITAN 439 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP991-2-2-2 THE SANBORN BUILDING 550 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q1-1-2-2 THE SHEPLEY 18 CASCO ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X+HJ-2-2-1-3 THOMAS BLOCK 100 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W+24-1-1-1-1 THREE DOLLAR DEWEYS 241 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6P+P5-3-4-2-3 TRADER JOES 87 MARGINAL WAY


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8C1-1-1-2 TREE HOUSE TOYS / MAPS 45 EXCHANGE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH44-3-3-4 U.S. POST OFFICE A 622 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP298-3-9-3 UNION STATION PLAZA 966 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R1-1-1-2 UNITED BANK & TRUST BLDG 465 CONGRESS ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q1-2-2-3 UNITY VILLAGE 6 STONE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPX72-2-2-2 UPHAM BLDG 56 NORTHPORT DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4W2-2-2-2 URBAN OUTFITTERS 188 MIDDLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3C1-2-1-2 VALLEY STREET APARTMENTS 88 GILMAN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3R2-3-2-3 VARIOUS SM BUSINESS 20 DANFORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ634-9-3-6 VETERANS AFFAIRS 144 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMHF+83-2-2-3-2 VIP 35 RIVERSIDE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5Q2-2-1-2 WADSWORTH BLDG, DUTCHS 28 PREBLE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP3J1-2-2-3 WALKER TERRACE 730 CONGRESS ST

 WALTON STREET BUSINESS
Exempt Exempt 87MFMPH75-4-4-3 PARK 135 WALTON ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+HV-1-2-2-2 WAREHOUSE 15 FRANKLIN ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP8V4-5-4-3 WAREHOUSE IN REAR 31 DIAMOND ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH4-5-3-4 WASHINGTON PARK 31 PHEASANT HILL DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPQH4-6-4-5 WASHINGTON PARK 65 PHEASANT HILL DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2J2-4-2-3 WEST END PLACE 183 BRACKETT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ633-4-2-6 WEX 1 HANCOCK ST




 Page 55
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 WHISKEY BARREL/PORT
Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5P2-5-3-4 PROPERTIES 82 HANOVER ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQC3-4-3-4 WISE PRINTING 33 MCALISTER FARM RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPHR2-1-2-2 970 BAXTER BLVD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2P+W5-2-4-2-4 134 PARK ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP5X+3J-2-2-2-2 300 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRP0-2-1-1 733 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4G0-4-2-1 157 GRANT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPRQ1-1-2-1 733 OCEAN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMXJ1-1-0-0 1838 FOREST AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4J2-2-0-2 286 STATE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM5P5-6-5-6 26 WALCH DR


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP2H1-2-1-1 30 WEST ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMPC36-6-4-6 37 FORE ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4J1-0-0-1 65 GRANT ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R2-2-1-2 180 PEARL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4X2-2-2-2 86 COMMERCIAL ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4P1-1-1-2 11 SHEPLEY ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ62+JM-3-6-3-5 86 Newbury Street Condo 4 25 Hancock Street Parking 120850.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4R2-3-3-3 PARKING GARAGE 23 FREE ST Parking 175134.0


Exempt Exempt 87MFMMQR+8H-2-1-2-2 CAPOZZA TILE CO 267 WARREN AVE

 Distribution
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM363-5-4-5 102 Hutchins Drive 102 Hutchins Drive 5.06 Center 82522.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4M2-4-3-4 Micucci Wholesale Foods 961 Riverside Street 1.43 Food Sales 40000.0

 Hospital
 (General
 Medical &
Failed Not Exempt Bramhall Campus 22 Bramhall Street Surgical) 1158254.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2M+QM-2-1-1-2 PORTLAND CLUB 152 STATE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P+HX-1-7-4-2 PORTLAND MUSEUM OF ART 148 FREE ST

 PORTLAND RETIREMENT
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPVM4-5-5-4 RESIDENCE 802 OCEAN AVE

 U-Haul Moving & Storage At Self-Storage
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPCV4-2-3-2 Rte 295 (731066) 411 Marginal Way Facility 55662.0




 Page 56
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 Manufacturi
 ng/Industrial
Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM3J+7W-2-2-1-2 ALLAGASH BREWING 50 INDUSTRIAL WAY Plant 75000.0

 Medical
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3F+V5-3-4-3-4 887 Congress Street 887 Congress Street 3.20 Office 48058.0

 Non-
 Refrigerated
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRQ3-4-2-3 00616-Portland 290 Presumpscot Street 0.00 0.0 Warehouse 39900.0


Failed Not Exempt 110 Free Street 110 Free Street 4.93 Office 83052.0

 301 NE 2nd Ave, Portland, OR -
Failed Not Exempt BLDG10028 301 NE 2nd Ave Office 25150.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPX8+P4-2-4-3-3 CHESHIRE BLDG 43 NORTHPORT DR Office 26784.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C1-3-2-2 USM OFFICES 501 FOREST AVE Office 26400.0

 Worship
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPJ4+RQ-1-2-2-1 ST JOSEPH CHURCH 671 STEVENS AVE Facility 20000.0

 Worship
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPPH+28-1-2-1-2 ST PIUS X CHURCH 492 OCEAN AVE Facility 20000.0


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3V1-2-2-2 . 54 YORK ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-3-3-3 509 FOREST AVE 509 FOREST AVE

 AAA NORTHERN NEW
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6M+QJ-1-2-2-1 ENGLAND 54 MARGINAL WAY


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM6W+63-4-4-2-4 ABC SUPPLY CO. 1 RICE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9F+VF-3-5-3-5 ALLEN & COLES 75 PINE TREE IND PKWY


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4W1-1-0-1 ANDIAMO SALON & SPA 52 EXCHANGE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP8F1-1-1-2 ANNEX BUILDING 45 BROWN ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMQ521-2-2-2 AUTO EUROPE 29 COMMERCIAL ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3R3-3-2-4 BAMICO PARKING 40 SPRING ST ARTERIAL


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+V3-2-3-2-4 BRISTOL 5 PORTLAND FISH PIER


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPM8+J9-6-5-4-4 CENTRAL ME POWER 138 CANCO RD


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPPH+2V-2-3-2-2 CHANCERY BUILDING 506 OCEAN AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q3-4-3-4 CUMBERLAND AVE PRKG 315 CUMBERLAND AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5W+H4-1-2-3-6 FEDERAL COURT BLD 168 FEDERAL ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPJ3-6-3-5 GEORGIA PACIFIC 508 WARREN AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9G+32-2-3-2-3 HALE TRAILER INC 20 PINE TREE IND PKWY


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMGC+8G-2-3-2-2 HAMPTON INN 1210 BRIGHTON AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMRP4+43-4-4-1-3 INN AT DIAMOND COVE 18 MCKINLEY CT


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMFF+V8-7-5-9-4 INN AT PORTLAND 1150 BRIGHTON AVE




 Page 57
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMCC4-4-4-3 LEEN CO / HOMAN'S ASSOC / 111 PINE TREE IND PKWY

 LIBERTY BAY RECOVERY
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7G3-2-1-3 CENTER 343 FOREST AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+VR-1-2-1-1 LONGFELLOW HOUSE 483 CONGRESS ST

 Maine College of Art and
Failed Not Exempt Design 522 Congress Street 664.98


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P2-1-3-2 MAINE GIRLS ACADEMY 631 STEVENS AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+PV-2-1-1-2 MAINE HISTORICAL SOC 489 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMX7+Q3-2-3-2-3 MAINE TURNPIKE 2352 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2W+HF-2-3-2-3 MARINE TRADE CENTER 2 PORTLAND FISH PIER


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMQQ3+7J-3-6-3-5 MARTIN'S POINT 331 VERANDA ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+HR-1-2-2-3 MASONIC TEMPLE 8 CHESTNUT ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPWC+PW-2-3-3-4 METRO 91 ST JOHN ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPQR2-3-2-3 NAPA AUTO PARTS 235 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM4J+GQ-2-3-3-3 NORTH SPORE 921 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP883-3-4-2 NURSING CARE CENTER 68 DEVONSHIRE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPVR+J8-2-1-2-2 PACK EDGE 340 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+7M-2-4-3-3 Porteous Bldg. 522 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-2-2-2 PORTLAND BALLET 517 FOREST AVE

 PORTLAND MOTOR CLUB
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRR3-3-2-3 STORAGE 293 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+W8-1-3-2-3 PORTLANDS BOYS CLUB 277 CUMBERLAND AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMJC+MV-4-3-3-5 RAMADA PLAZA / EGG & I 155 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6W2-2-1-2 ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHP 313 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2H0-1-1-1 RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE 59 CARLETON ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5R+P2-2-3-2-2 SALVATION ARMY 2 CEDAR ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPWR+FP-2-3-1-3 SEA BREEZE 419 PRESUMPSCOT ST

 SOUTHERN MAINE ORAL
Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMXC1-2-1-2 SUGERY 131 JOHNSON RD


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5Q+JF-1-2-2-3 SPURWINK 61 PREBLE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP9C2-3-2-3 STARBIRD MUSIC 525 FOREST AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4Q+4J-2-2-2-3 STORAGE MCA 540 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM39+H5-3-2-3-3 SURBRIDGE YANKEE 2 BLUEBERRY RD




 Page 58
 Water
 Use Primary % %
 Total (Location- Total (Location- Weather Intensity Property Difference Difference
 Based) GHG Based) GHG Weather Normalize (All Type - Property GFA from from
 Property is Emissions Emissions Normalize d Source Water ENERGY Portfolio - Calculated National National
 Part of a Intensity (Metric Tons Site EUI d Site EUI Source EUI EUI Sources) STAR Manager - (Buildings) Median Site Median
Status Exemption UBID Campus Property Name Address Line 1 (kgCO2e/ft²) CO2e) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (kBtu/ft²) (gal/ft²) Score Calculated (ft²) EUI Source EUI

 SURFACE CREATIONS OF
Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM5W+P5-2-3-2-4 MAINE 25 RICE ST

 TECH PACK / MEDQUIST /
Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMRC3-4-2-4 VORTECH 410 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP4X+VG-2-3-1-2 U S CUSTOMS HOUSE 99 COMMERCIAL ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM3F7-8-9-9 UNUM 2145 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJPVM+X5-3-5-2-5 VA CLINIC 101 W COMMERCIAL ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM6Q3-4-3-4 VACANT 1119 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPMCX+F7-3-6-2-5 VERIZON 13 DAVIS FARM RD


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMJF+G7-2-3-1-5 VERRILLO'S REST/LNG 155 RIVERSIDE ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMM9C+2X-4-2-6-2 WB MASON 106 PINE TREE IND PKWY


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP3P1-2-2-2 WCSH TV 6 ALIVE 128 HIGH ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP7V2-2-2-2 WGME BLDG 81 NORTHPORT DR


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP5V+W7-3-3-3-4 385 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMPRR2-3-2-3 275 PRESUMPSCOT ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6W+M7-2-3-2-4 307 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP6Q+G4-5-7-4-7 71 KENNEBEC ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMPH6-5-5-6 PORTLAND SPORTS COMPLEX 550 WARREN AVE


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP4Q2-4-2-3 RENY'S 540 CONGRESS ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMMQ88-9-8-7 SELF STORAGE UNITS 76 WARREN AVE


Failed Not Exempt 87MFMP2Q+9G-3-2-1-3 SOUTH COMMONS 115 DANFORTH ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFMQ643-4-3-4 SUN LIFE 110 THAMES ST


Failed Not Exempt 87MFJMXF+7X-3-4-1-3 TIME WARNER CABLE 118 JOHNSON RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFMP6R3-4-4-5 U-1 OXFORD CONDO 134 LANCASTER ST


Exempt Exempt 87MFPM8W3-3-2-4 VERIZON 1 DAVIS FARM RD


Exempt Exempt 87MFJMXG+J6-1-4-1-3 WHSE/OFFICE FOR TW CABLE 90 JOHNSON RD


Failed Not Exempt 87MFPM3J3-4-3-3 YANKEE LANES 867 RIVERSIDE ST




 Page 59
City of Portland | Sustainability Office
Troy Moon, Director



To: Sustainability and Transportation Committee
 Regina Phillips, Chair




MEETING DATE
November 12, 2025

AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Item C

PURPOSE
To inform the committee about the updated greenhouse gas inventory.

COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT
Provides information related to progress on One Climate Future Goals

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS

As part of the development of the One Climate Future climate action plan, Integral Group,
now Introba, conducted a community wide greenhouse gas inventory using data from
2017. The purpose of the inventory was to develop baseline information regarding
emissions generated within the city limits of Portland. The City chose to follow the
Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory (GPC) which
is compliant with the Global Covenant of Mayors’ Common Reporting Framework. The
inventory was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory and Information System
(CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities, the tool adopted by most cities around the world. The City of
Portland inventory used the GPC BASIC approach, which requires reporting for
stationary energy, transportation, and waste.

This means we collected data for Scope 1 emissions, which largely correlate with the
burning of fossil fuels in building and vehicles, Scope 2 emissions, which are largely
emissions related to our use of electricity, and a small portion of Scope 3 emissions
related waste.




 1

 Page 60
Scope 3 emissions are not generally tracked as part of municipal GHG inventories. This
includes things such as emissions related to employee commuting and emissions
generated in the supply chain of goods and services purchased by the City.

Last year, the Sustainability Office again commissioned Introba to update our inventory
using 2023 data, which was the most recent year for which we had complete data
available. Our goal was to conduct an inventory that would be as close to an “apples to
apples” comparison as possible.

The categories we inventoried and source of the data used are shown on this table:




Some of the data is from utilities that meter service, such as the electric utility and the
gas utility and can be deemed to be very reliable. Usage of other fuels must be estimated


 2

 Page 61
using information from a variety of sources and proxies. This includes examining
assessor’s data to determine how many buildings use fuel oil and approximating how
much an average facility uses. It also includes estimates of diesel fuel and gasoline
burned in Portland using regional transportation data collected by GPCOG. This provides
a reasonable approximation but is not as fine grained as we would like. Overall, we feel
our consultant was able to complete an inventory that was very similar to the one
conducted during the development of OCF.

Buildings

Buildings continue to be the largest emitters of greenhouse gases in Portland,
contributing 60% of the total. As you can see in the chart below, emissions from the
building sector (shown in blue) fell noticeably between 2017 and 2023, with the largest
reduction coming from commercial buildings. Combined, emissions from buildings fell
by 14%. (481,951 MTCO2e down from 560,666 MTCO2e). We attribute this to:

 ●​ A reduction in fuel oil use (down nearly 42%)
 ●​ Fewer emissions generated from electricity use due to greening of the grid
 ●​ Overall energy efficiency improvements in buildings

It is notable that this reduction occurred despite significant new construction of
commercial buildings in Portland.




 3

 Page 62
Transportation

Emissions from transportation make up nearly 40% of the greenhouse gases emitted in
Portland and result from the driving of commercial vehicles, passenger vehicles, offroad
vehicles (mostly at the Portland Jetport), ferries operated by Casco Bay Lines, and cruise
ships while they are in port. Unfortunately, we found that emissions from the
transportation sector rose almost 20% between 2017 - 2023. (305,277 MTCO2e up from
255,252 MTCO2e)




This is due to several factors including:

 ●​ A greater number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) due in part to population
 growth, commercial activity, and a greater number of visits to the region
 ●​ The inclusion of airport service vehicles as off-road transportation, which was not
 accounted for in the 2017 baseline inventory
 ●​ Increased waterborne navigation in the form of ferries and cruise ship visits

The increase in emissions from on road transportation is far and away the largest
contributor to transportation emissions, rising more than 42,600 tons since 2017. The
chart below shows the percentage of emissions by vehicle type and demonstrates that
passenger trucks (SUVs and light duty pick up trucks for personal use) contribute 38% of
the emissions on the transportation sector. Unfortunately, these large, heavy vehicles
have poor fuel economy.




 4

 Page 63
It should be noted that there are far fewer heavy and medium duty commercial trucks in
Portland but they generate a large portion of the emissions from the transportation
sector because of the dirty fuel they use (diesel).

Waste

Emissions from solid waste management and wastewater management are only about
2% of Portland’s overall calculated emissions. They include emissions from incineration
of waste at ecomaine, operations of the wastewater treatment plant, and emissions
related to composting food scraps. It is important to recognize that our inventory only
captures emissions from local management of waste streams. It does not factor in
emissions related to manufacturing, packaging, transporting, and marketing consumer
goods outside our city limits. Efforts to reduce waste and to recycle remain essential in
order to reduce global GHG emissions.

Findings

When we combine the inventory results from the three sectors, we find that the
significant emissions reduction in the building sector is largely offset by the increase in
emissions from the transportation sector.




 5

 Page 64
This is demonstrated by the columns on the right hand side of the graph above, where
we see that total emissions from Portland fell from 840,419 MTCO2e in 2017 to 801,825
MTCO2e in 2023 - a reduction of 4.6%.

CONCLUSION(S)

The 14% reduction in emissions from the building sector, despite an increased economic
activity and increase in the number buildings indicates that state and local policies
intended to reduce emissions are working. These include:

The State of Maine’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, the statutory requirement that
electricity on Maine’s electricity grid be 100% clean/renewable by 2040. This policy is
bringing more green electricity onto the grid in support of beneficial electrification.
Electrifying buildings and transportation remains an essential way to reduce GHG
emissions.

The 42% drop in the use of heating oil in Portland demonstrates a significant shift away
from this dirty fuel. This coincides with State and local efforts to promote heat pumps
and energy efficiency.

Updated energy codes are having a positive impact on emissions. In 2017 the State was
still enforcing the inefficient 2009 energy code. In 2020, the State passed new
legislation that requires the energy code to be updated regularly and established a
voluntary “stretch” code that is more efficient than the current base energy code. The



 6

 Page 65
City of Portland has a local ordinance that requires us to enforce the stretch code.
Chapter 6 of City Code requires the City to lead by example by mandating that City
funded building projects be even more efficient that the stretch code.

New building policies are working to reduce emissions from new construction and major
renovations but emissions from existing buildings will continue to be a challenge.
Nearly all emissions from the building sector are privately owned. Upgrading energy
systems and improving building envelopes will require significant private investment
and generally happen during building maintenance cycles. The Energy Benchmarking
and Disclosure ordinance is an important tool to connect with the owners of buildings
over 20,000 square feet and to help them understand the financial benefits of improving
the energy efficiency of their buildings. Once Central Maine Power is able to provide the
owners of multi-tenant buildings with whole building data we will recommend adoption
of building performance standards that require commercial buildings to show
continuous improvement in energy performance. Such policies are in effect in several
cities including Boston, Cambridge, New York, Washington DC, Ann Arbor, Denver, and
Seattle. We will also need to consider policies that encourage residential properties to
decarbonize, potentially examining a policy that requires disclosure of Home Energy
Scores at the time of sale as is currently done in jurisdictions like Portland, OR.
Disclosure of a HES allows new home buyers to better understand the cost of heating and
cooling a home. This helps them make a better buying decision because they will
understand the full cost of maintaining the home. It also encourages home sellers to
improve the energy efficiency of their home to make it more attractive on the market.

The City’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions in the buildings sector have been supported
by important policies at the State level, particularly the RPS. It will be important to
monitor the State’s progress in implementing it to ensure that the grid is 100% clean by
2040 as required by Statute. This will ensure that our Electrify Everything (beneficial
electrification) strategy will succeed in decarbonizing the building sector in conjunction
with other zero carbon energy systems, such as geothermal. It is encouraging that the
newly created Department of Energy Resources has the responsibility and authority to
issue RFPs for large-scale renewable energy procurement in order to meet the 2040
target.

The increase in GHG emissions in the transportation sector is discouraging but must be
seen in a regional context as our inventory measures all vehicle traffic in Portland, not
just from Portland residents. This includes commuters, tourists, commercial vehicles,
and heavy trucking. It includes traffic on local streets and roads as well as on the Maine
Turnpike and I-295. As noted in The final report for the Greater Portland Rapid Transit
Study, VMT in Greater Portland has increased by 10% during the past decade, that traffic



 7

 Page 66
congestion is worsening, and this trend will be exacerbated by the nearly four million
square feet of real-estate development planned or proposed in the study area. The study
points out that transit development has not kept pace with the population and economic
growth.

The City has been a strong advocate for the development of a rapid transit system and an
active participant in the ongoing studies for a system to connect Portland and Gorham.
Councilors and staff continue to work with GPCOG/PACTS to emphasize the need for
greater regional support of transit. Earlier this year the Sustainability and
Transportation Committee held a forum with regional transit agencies to discuss policy
actions that might improve transit operations in Portland and regionally.

The Sustainability and Transportation Committee has also led efforts this year to gain
City Council adoption of a Vision Zero policy and quick implementation plan that is now
underway. The Committee also led the effort to update the City’s complete streets policy
as well as supported the funding of a comprehensive transportation plan. The Planning
Department has just issued an RFP for this work. We anticipate that implementation of
these policy actions will improve road safety for all road users and encourage more
residents to walk, ride bicycles, and to use public transportation.

The adoption of ReCode in 2024 brought several important policy changes
recommended in One Climate Future to encourage travel without the use of a car. This
includes eliminating parking minimums and adopting parking maximums for new
development. It also includes Transit Oriented Development zones along main travel
corridors where people can access transit most easily.

Portland continues to be a statewide leader in the adoption and promotion of electric
vehicles. According to GPCOG, the number of EVs registered in Portland rose from 184 in
2018 to 1602 in 2024. The City has played a key role in the expansion of EV charging
capacity by hosting publicly available DC fast chargers and L2 chargers on City property,
including a new bank of DC fast chargers slated for installation next to the Miss Portland
Diner this fall. We have also adopted a policy that requires 20% of new parking spaces
come with L2 charging installed.

Reducing GHG emissions from transportation will require continued leadership by the
City on transportation issues as well as robust and ongoing collaboration with state and
regional partners. The Maine Climate Council’s Transportation Working Group has
identified the trend of increasing VMT as a significant challenge to meeting Statewide
goals and the City should continue to engage with them and State policy makers to
address this.



 8

 Page 67
PRIOR COMMITTEE REVIEW
n/a

PREPARED BY
Troy Moon, Sustainability Director


ATTACHMENTS

2023 GHG Emissions Memo from Introba




 9

 Page 68
City of Portland
Community Inventory of 2023
Greenhouse Gas Emissions



Technical Memorandum
June 2025




 Page 69
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS



Table of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
2 Community Inventory Results ........................................................................................................................... 4
 2.1 Summary................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
 2.2 Buildings ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
 2.3 Transportation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 11
 2.4 Waste ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13
3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................... 15
 3.1 Uncertainty ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 15
 3.2 Citywide Protocol ................................................................................................................................................................................ 15
 3.3 Differences from 2017 Inventory .................................................................................................................................................. 16
 3.4 Greenhouse Gases Included ........................................................................................................................................................... 17
 3.5 Summary of Data Sources ............................................................................................................................................................... 18
 3.6 Stationary Sources .............................................................................................................................................................................. 19
 3.7 Mobile Sources .................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
 3.8 Waste and Wastewater ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23




 Page 2 of 24

 Page 70
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




1 Introduction
The cities of Portland and South Portland published their joint climate action and adaptation plan One Climate
Future in 2020. As part of that effort, Introba (then Integral Group) was tasked with developing a baseline
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory for the City of Portland. The inventory was compiled and submitted
using the City Inventory and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities, which follows the Global Protocol for
Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories (GPC)1 and is compliant with the Global Covenant of
Mayors’ Common Reporting Framework. At the time, the City of Portland selected 2017 as the baseline year for
tracking GHG emissions reductions moving forward.
The City of Portland contracted Introba again in 2024 to complete an update to their GHG emissions inventory.
The update took place four years after the One Climate Future plan was released, and by using 2023 data,
represents a six-year span since the baseline inventory year (2017 to 2023). The purpose of the update is to
demonstrate progress made toward the City’s GHG emissions reductions goals and inform future planning efforts.
The 2023 update draws on the methodology and outcomes from the 2017 baseline inventory to maintain a
consistent and replicable approach with future updates in mind.
The updated inventory follows the same Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Inventories and was compiled and submitted using the City Inventory Reporting and Information System (CIRIS)
tool from C40 Cities.2 It is a community-scale inventory accounting for all emissions generated within city
boundaries, as opposed to a corporate or municipal inventory which would only account for emissions generated
by city-owned assets.
The City of Portland’s inventory is divided into scopes 1, 2, and 3 as shown in Figure 1:
 • Scope 1: all emissions generated within city boundaries
 • Scope 2: emissions occurring as a result of grid-supplied electricity consumed within city boundaries
 • Scope 3: other emissions occurring outside the boundaries of the city as a result of activities taking
 place within the city




Figure 1. Emissions scopes included in the 2023 GHG inventory




1
  GHG Protocol, Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute. https://ghgprotocol.org/greenhouse-gas-protocol-accounting-reporting-standard-cities
2
  C40 Cities. Reporting GHG emissions inventories. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/City-Inventory-Reporting-and-
Information-System-CIRIS?language=en_US



 Page 3 of 24

 Page 71
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


The City of Portland’s inventory uses the GPC’s “BASIC” approach, which requires reporting for stationary energy,
transportation and waste. The “BASIC” approach is consistent with most GPC-compliant inventories across the
glove. Further details on the approach are found in the Methodology section of this memo.


2 Community Inventory Results
2.1 Summary




Figure 2. Portland GHG Emissions Summary

The overall output of data from the CIRIS tool for the City of Portland is shown in Figure 2 above and Table 1
below. Note the totals shown in these and future tables in the memo may differ slightly from the sum of the rows
due to rounding. Overall, the region was responsible for 801,825 tons of GHG emissions, measured in metric
tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e).
Table 1. GHG Emissions by Sector and Scope




It is important to note that this not a comprehensive picture of all emissions generated in the city. There are various



 Page 4 of 24

 Page 72
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


sectors and sources, particularly scope 3 emissions sources (e.g., air travel, purchased goods and services), that are
not reflected in this inventory, but do in fact have a significant impact on emissions generated in the city. It is also
important to note that data presented in this memo are a reflection of the inventory results with all digits
provided by the CIRIS tool for consistency; these numbers may be estimated through various means and should
not be taken as exact. These and other details are discussed in the Methodology section of this memo.

On a per capita basis, Portland generated 11.7 tons of GHG emissions per resident. This compares favorably to the
US national average of 17.6 tons per resident, due in large part to the low emissions intensity of the regional
electricity grid (ISO-NE). However, Portland is more energy intensive than some larger Northeast cities (e.g.,
Boston), based in part on the greater demand for heating fuels, particularly fuel oil, and a greater reliance on
personal cars rather than public transit. Figure 3 shows a comparison of the per capita GHG emissions in the City
of Portland among peers and within the national and global context. Note the inventory years below vary and may
not reflect the most up-to-date and accurate emissions for these jurisdictions. Each of the inventories reflected
below may also include slightly different sectors and emissions sources, so this figure should be used for rough
comparison only.




Figure 3. Comparison of Per Capita GHG Emissions (variable inventory years)

Portland’s total GHG emissions for 2023 are down 4.6% since 2017 (down from 840,419 MTCO2e). This
difference is largely driven by a reduction in stationary (i.e., buildings) energy use and emissions, to be discussed
in greater detail later in the memo. Figure 4 provides a comparison of GHG emissions between 2017 and 2023 by
sector and scope.




 Page 5 of 24

 Page 73
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




Figure 4. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Sector and Scope (2017 & 2023)

Again, it is important to note in the figure above that while scope 3 emissions (generated from waste disposal
occurring outside of city boundaries) appear minimal, this is not a true reflection of the significant impact that
other scope 3 sources that are not included in the inventory (e.g., air travel, purchased goods and services) have.




Figure 5. GHG Emissions by Subsector (2023)

Overall, the use of electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil in buildings is the main driver of Portland’s GHG footprint,
with residential, commercial, and industrial buildings being responsible for a combined 60% of GHG emissions.
Mobile sources within city boundaries, including on-road transportation (e.g., cars) and waterborne transportation
(e.g., ferries) are responsible for a combined 38%. Lastly the incineration of solid waste is responsible for the
remaining 2%. Figure 5 (above) shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by these subsectors and Table 2 (below)



 Page 6 of 24

 Page 74
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


shows the energy use by subsector contributing to these total emissions
Table 2. Energy Use and GHG Emissions by Subsector (2023)




When comparing GHG emissions by subsector between 2017 and 2023, the most significant differences come
from a) reductions in stationary emissions across all building types, and b) an increase in emissions from on-road
transportation (Figure 6), to be discussed in more detail in the subsequent sections.




Figure 6. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Subsector (2017 & 2023)

When looking at GHG emissions by fuel source, the majority of emissions are generated from the use of electricity
(20%), natural gas (31%), and fuel oil (18%) in buildings. Gasoline (33%) and diesel (12%) used in transportation
makes up most of the remainder. Figure 7 (below) shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by fuel source. Table 3


 Page 7 of 24

 Page 75
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


shows the actual energy use by fuel source contributing to these total emissions.


 Portland ss ons o r
 Solid aste, 1
 Propane, 3 astewater, 0




 iesel, 10 lectricity, 17




 atural Gas, 2
 Gasoline, 2




 Fuel il, 1




Figure 7. GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2023)

Table 3. Energy Use and GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2023)




When comparing GHG emissions by fuel source between 2017 and 2023, the most significant differences come
from a lower percentage of emissions generated from burning fuel oil in buildings and a larger percentage of
emissions generated from burning natural gas in buildings, as well as gasoline and diesel in vehicles, cruise ships,
and ferries (Figure 8).




 Page 8 of 24

 Page 76
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




Figure 8. Comparison of GHG Emissions by Fuel Source (2017 & 2023)


2.2 Buildings
6 % of Portland’s footpr nt s attr ta l to n rg s n buildings, which produced a total of 481,951
MTCO2e of GHG emissions in 2023. Building GHG data was computed from a combination of community-wide
electricity and natural gas consumption information, and estimated use of other fuels including fuel oil and
propane. The process for calculating building emissions is described in the Stationary Sources section of the
Methodology.




Figure 9. Building Sector GHG Emissions (2023)

Figure 9 (above) shows the breakdown of building emissions across the residential, commercial, and industrial
building sectors. Table 4 (below) shows the breakdown of energy use by fuel source contributing to the total
emissions across each building sector.



 Page 9 of 24

 Page 77
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Table 4. Site and Source Energy Use by Building Sector




When comparing GHG emissions across building sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall decrease in
emissions across all building sectors despite increased development in Portland during recent years (Figure 10).
Overall building sector emissions are down about 14% since 2017 (481,951 MTCO2e down from 560,666
MTCO2e). This is most likely due to several factors, including:

 • A reduction in fuel oil use (down nearly 42%), often due to the conversion of fuel oil heating systems to
 electric heat pumps or natural gas-based systems (lower GHG intensity)
 • Less emissions generated from electricity use due to greening of the grid (i.e., greater mix of renewables
 making up grid-supplied electricity)
 • Overall energy efficiency improvements in buildings, due in part to programs and services offered
 through Efficiency Maine and other state incentive programs




Figure 10. Comparison of Building Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023)




 Page 10 of 24

 Page 78
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS



2.3 Transportation
Transportation is responsible for a o t 8% of Portland’s footpr nt, or 305,277 MTCO2e of GHG
emissions. Transportation emissions were estimated for all on-road and off-road transportation occurring within
city boundaries. The process for calculating these emissions is described in the Mobile Sources section of the
Methodology. Figure 11 shows the breakdown of transportation emissions across on-road (e.g., passenger cars),
off-road (e.g., airport vehicles), and waterborne (e.g., ferries) transportation types.




Figure 11. Transportation Sector GHG Emissions (2023)

The following figures provide more context to the on-road transportation emissions, which make up over 95% of
the emissions in the transportation sector. Figure 12 shows the makeup of vehicle types registered in Portland,
with passenger cars and trucks (inclusive of SUVs) making up 81% of vehicles in the city.




Figure 12. Makeup of Vehicle Types Registered in City (2023)

Figure 13 shows the breakdown of GHG emissions by vehicle type, demonstrating that medium and heavy-duty
trucks have a greater impact on emissions than the proportion of these vehicles among the total vehicle stock
would imply. This is due to the disproportionately larger quantity of fuel – particularly emissions-intensive diesel –
that these vehicles consume.



 Page 11 of 24

 Page 79
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




Figure 13. GHG Emissions by Vehicle Type (2023)

When comparing GHG emissions across transportation sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall
increase in emissions across all transportation sectors (Figure 14). Overall transportation sector emissions are
up 19.6% since 2017 (305,277 MTCO2e up from 255,252 MTCO2e). This is most likely due to several factors,
including:

 • A greater number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in some on-road vehicle types (e.g., diesel vehicles)
 registered in the city, due in part to population growth, commercial activity, and a greater number of visits
 to the region
 • The inclusion of airport service vehicles as off-road transportation, which was not accounted for in the
 2017 baseline inventory
 • Increased waterborne navigation in the form of ferries and cruise ship visits




Figure 14. Comparison of Transportation Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023)




 Page 12 of 24

 Page 80
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS



2.4 Waste
The waste sector is responsible a o t % of Portland’s footpr nt, or 14,596 MTCO2e of GHG emissions.
Waste emissions were estimated for all waste produced and treated within city boundaries. The process for
calculating these emissions is described in the Waste and Wastewater section of the Methodology. Figure 15
shows the breakdown of waste emissions across biological waste (i.e., compost), incinerated waste (i.e., municipal
solid waste incinerated at the Ecomaine plant), and wastewater (i.e., process emissions from the chemical
breakdown of sewage) types.




Figure 15. Waste Sector GHG Emissions (2023)

When comparing GHG emissions across waste sectors between 2017 and 2023, there is an overall decrease in
emissions, largely due to the decrease in emissions generated by solid waste incineration (Figure 16). Overall
waste emissions are down 40.4% (14,596 MTCO2e down from 24,502 MTCO2e). Despite conversations with the
City and Ecomaine staff, it is unclear what has driven this reduction in GHG emissions from incinerated waste. It is
possible that there was a discrepancy in how the emissions were calculated and/or reported for the 2017 baseline
inventory. However, it is worth noting that a) the waste sector emissions represent a very small portion of the
Portland’s total emissions (2%), so the change does not impact the overall emissions landscape significantly, and
b) that the City and data provider (Ecomaine) are confident in the 2023 data moving forward.




 Page 13 of 24

 Page 81
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




Figure 16. Comparison of Waste Sector GHG Emissions (2017 & 2023)




 Page 14 of 24

 Page 82
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




3 Methodology
3.1 Uncertainty
The 2023 inventory was compiled using measured data, projections, models, and, where data was unavailable,
best estimates. The inventory can be regularly revised as new and better data become available, as models are
improved, and as international standards and guidance evolve. For these reasons, longer-term trends are likely to
prove more reliable than absolute numbers or year-to-year changes. The greatest area of uncertainty in the
inventory is the estimate for fuel oil consumption.


3.2 Citywide Protocol
Portland’s community GHG inventory follows the Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission
Inventories (GPC)3 developed by the World Resources Institute. The inventory was compiled and submitted using
the City Inventory Reporting and Information System (CIRIS) tool from C40 Cities 4, version 2.5, which is compliant
with the Global Covenant of Mayors Common Reporting Framework (CRF) 5, a framework followed by many cities
globally.

GPC-compliant inventories usually follow the “BASIC” or “BASIC+” approach, which largely differ in the extent of
Scope 3 emissions included. Table 5 shows the major emissions sources included in GPC inventories. BASIC
inventories typically include all sources highlighted in green. It was decided by the City of Portland and Introba to
use the BASIC approach based on data availability and to keep the methodology consistent with the 2017 baseline
inventory. The BASIC approach includes all scope 1 and 2 emissions generated within city boundaries, as well as
the scope 3 in-boundary waste and wastewater emissions.




3
  GHG Protocol, Global Protocol for Community-Scale Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventories (GPC) Washington, DC: World
Resources Institute. https://ghgprotocol.org/greenhouse-gas-protocol-accounting-reporting-standard-cities
4
  C40 Cities. Reporting GHG emissions inventories. https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/City-Inventory-Reporting-and-
Information-System-CIRIS?language=en_US
5
  Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy. Global Common Reporting Framework.
https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-initiatives/data4cities/common-global-reporting-framework/



 Page 15 of 24

 Page 83
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Table 5. GPC GHG Emissions Sources (BASIC sources are highlighted in green)




3.3 Differences from 2017 Inventory
Emissions Sources:

Nearly all emissions sources across stationary, transportation, and waste sectors are identical to the 2017
inventory. The lone exception is the 2023 addition of off-road vehicles, which included service vehicles at the
Portland International Jetport, representing less than 1 of Portland’s total emissions. Off-road vehicle data was
not collected for the 2017 inventory.




 Page 16 of 24

 Page 84
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Electricity Emissions Factor:

The 2023 inventory uses the 2022 GHG intensity for the Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) New
England sub-region factor from PA’s eGRI 6 database of regional GHG intensities. This region is aligned with ISO
New England. This is an update from the 2017 inventory, which used the 2016 GHG intensity. Due to increasing
renewable energy generation, the 2022 emissions factor (2.45E-04 MTCO2e/kWh) is lower than the 2016 emissions
factor (2.66E-04 MTCO2e/kWh) by about 8%, largely contributing to a reduction in GHG emissions resulting from
electricity consumption.


3.4 Greenhouse Gases Included
The inventory quantified three of the six internationally recognized GHGs, including carbon dioxide (CO 2),
methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Data for fugitive N2O emissions from healthcare facilities were not readily
available at the time of the inventory, so these emissions, which are assumed to be minimal, were excluded. Data
on emissions of the other three internationally recognized groups of GHGs – hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) – was not available. HFC emissions were also considered
negligible under the assumption that all refrigerators, heat pumps, and air conditioners were installed and
disposed of properly under State regulations. Industrial emissions of SF 6 were not researched. Emissions of the
three measured GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O) were converted to Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide equivalent (MTCO 2e)
emissions using the 100-year Global Warming Potential (GWP) coefficients of each gas developed by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 5 th Assessment Report (AR5), as shown in Table 6 below. Table
7 shows the main GHG emissions factors used for the calculations in the inventory.
Table 6. Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases

 100-year Global Warming
 Greenhouse Gas Chemical Formula
 Potential (GWP), AR5
Carbon Dioxide CO2 1
Methane CH4 28
Nitrous Oxide N2O 265




6
 Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID). United States Environmental Protection Agency.
https://www.epa.gov/egrid



 Page 17 of 24

 Page 85
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Table 7. Emissions Factors Used

 CO2/unit CH4/unit N2O/unit Total
 Source Unit
 (MTCO2e) (MTCO2e) (MTCO2e) MTCO2e/unit
Electricity kWh 2.43E-04 8.00E-07 9.62E-07 2.45E-04
Natural Gas Therm 5.31E-03 2.80E-06 2.65E-06 5.31E-03
Fuel Oil No. 2 MMBtu 7.40E-02 8.40E-05 1.59E-04 7.42E-02
Diesel Oil Gal 1.02E-02 1.15E-05 2.12E-05 1.02E-02
Propane Gal 5.72E-03 7.56E-06 1.33E-05 5.74E-03
Gasoline MMBtu 7.02E-02 8.40E-05 1.59E-04 7.05E-02
Cruise kWh 6.86E-04 2.24E-07 7.69E-06 6.94E-04
Cruise Boiler kWh 9.22E-04 2.10E-06 5.30E-07 9.25E-04
Diesel Ship Gal 1.02E-02 1.68E-06 1.19E-04 1.03E-02


3.5 Summary of Data Sources
Table 8. Summary of Data Sources

 Sector Data Name of Source Provider Year


 Electricity Emission Factor eGRID v2022 U.S. EPA 2022
 Emissions Factors (applied to
 all sectors) Fossil Fuel Combussion
 EPA Emission Factor List U.S. EPA 2023
 Emission Factors
 Central Maine Power (CMP)
 Electricity Use CMP 2023
 Electricity Use

 Natural Gas Use Unitil Natural Gas Use Unitil 2023

 Residential Energy Consumption
 Fuel Oil Use Residential U.S. EIA 2020
 Survey (RECS)
 Stationary Energy
 Fuel Oil Use Commercial Building Energy
 U.S. EIA 2018
 Commercial/Industrial Consumption Survey (CBECS)
 Wastewater Treatment Energy Portland Water District (East End
 Portland Water District (PWD) 2023
 Use Plant)

 Building Floor Area Tax Assessor Parcel Database City of Portland 2023

 Fuel Consumption from Vehicle Greater Portland Council of
 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 2023
 Miles Traveled Governments

 Jetport Fleet Fuel Jetport Fleet Fuel Consumption Portland International Jetport 2023

 Transportation Ferry Fuel Consumption Casco Bay Lines Fuel Consumption Casco Bay Lines 2023


 Cruise Ship Port Schedule Portland Docking Schedule City of Portland 2023

 Cruise Ship Energy Use While
 Cruise Ship Study Port of Los Angeles 2022
 Docked

 Solid Waste Collected Municipal Solid Waste Tonnage Ecomaine 2023
 Waste
 Garbage to Garden Compost
 Food Waste Composted Garbage to Garden 2023
 Tonnage

Data for the inventory was collected from a variety of sources spanning government, local utility providers, and



 Page 18 of 24

 Page 86
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


national datasets, among others. Wherever possible, data was collected for the 2023 calendar year. In several
cases where 2023 data was unavailable due to irregular or less frequent updates, data from the closest year
possible (e.g., 2022) was used. Table 8 (above) provides a summary of data sources used, many of which are
described in the following sections.


3.6 Stationary Sources
Stationary emissions (i.e., generated by buildings) were calculated from the consumption of several fuel sources:
electricity, natural gas, fuel oil (i.e., heating oil), and to a lesser extent propane. Electricy consumption data for the
area in 2023 was provided by Central Maine Power (CMP), broken out between residential, commercial, and
industrial sectors, including total consumption and number of accounts. Natural gas consumption data for 2023
was provided by Until, broken out between total residential consumption and combined commercial and
industrial consumption (combined for the privacy of large accounts). Propane consumption data was provided by
Portland Water District for wastewater treatment facilities only. Fuel oil consumption was estimated using the
methodology outlined below. Wood heat was excluded from the inventory due to a lack of available data and
because the GPC considers wood a “biogenic” source and is treated as carbon neutral. ther potential stationary
fuel sources (e.g., kerosene) were left out due to a lack available data and their emissions were assumed to be
negligible.

Energy Use Estimation and Assumptions for Fuel Oil

Although it is a common source of fuel for heating in Maine, no direct data was available for the consumption of
fuel oil. Fuel oil is delivered by many companies that are exceptionally challenging to track and largely unwilling to
share data on their sales, which is common across the country. To calculate fuel oil consumption for Portland, total
floor areas and heating fuel sources for different building types were estimated and various Energy Use Intensities
(EUIs) were applied as described below. This approach followed the same methodology used in the 2017 baseline
inventory with updated data sources where available. Emissions from fuel oil consumption represent about 15% of
Portland’s total emissions, so there is an inherent layer of uncertainty to the total emissions reported for the city.

Building floor areas were compiled from the City of Portland’s Tax Assessor’s database for residential, commercial,
and industrial building types (Table 9). The incidence of fuel oil use across these building types was then
estimated as a percentage of gross floor area (GFA) heated with fuel oil. For residential buildings, this was
estimated using Residential Prototype Building Models from the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest
National Laboratory (PNNL) for the state of Maine 7. The incidence of fuel oil use in commercial and industrial
buildings was estimated using the 2018 Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey (CBECS) for New
England8 (most recent available).




7
  Prototype Building Models. Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. https://www.energycodes.gov/prototype-
building-models
8
  Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration.
https://www.eia.gov/consumption/commercial/data/2018/index.php?view=characteristics



 Page 19 of 24

 Page 87
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Table 9. Floor Area and Gross Floor Area Heated by Fuel Oil by Building Sector

 GFA Heated by GFA Heated by
 Building Type Floor Area (ft2)
 Fuel Oil (%) Fuel Oil (ft2)
Residential 43,104,632 35.03% 15,101,282
Commercial 43,229,218 34.83% 15,056,149
Industrial 7,165,908 34.77% 2,491,784

Preliminary EUIs measured in kBtu/ft2 for each building and fuel type (Table 10) were then developed based on the
U.S Energy Information Administration (EIA) nationwide building energy surveys: the CBECS for 2018 and the
Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) for 20209 (most recent available). These values were compared
against actual total consumption data (for electricity and natural gas) across the estimated floor area (ft2) of each
building type to ensure the EUIs for these fuel types made practical sense. However, only the fuel oil EUI was used
to estimate fuel oil consumption (there was no need to estimate consumption for electricity and natural gas).
Table 10. EUI by Building and Fuel Type




Note that the EUIs for natural gas and fuel oil in commercial and industrial buildings were assumed to be the
same. This decision was made for several reasons. First, no distinction was made between commercial and
industrial natural gas accounts in the data provided by Unitil so there was no way to know roughly how much
natural gas use could be allocated to each of these building types. Second, commercial and industrial buildings
come in many forms and have vastly different energy needs based on typology and, in the case of industrial
buildings, process loads. Assuming an average EUI across both building categories provides an accurate estimate
of city-wide energy use without needing to collect building- or even typology-specific energy use data (which
would not have been available). Lastly, this assumption is consistent with the methodology applied in the 2017
baseline inventory and other GHG inventories across Maine (e.g., Penobscot Climate Action).

Finally, the fuel oil EUI for each building type (kBtu/ft2) was applied to the gross floor area estimated to be heated
by fuel oil for each building type (ft2) to calculate the total fuel oil consumed across each building type, converted
to MMBtu (Table 11).
Table 11. Estimated Fuel Oil Consumption by Building Type

 Fuel Oil
 Fuel Oil EUI GFA Heated by
 Building Type Consumption
 (kBtu/ft2) Fuel Oil (ft2)
 (MMBtu)
Residential 82.7 15,101,282 1,248,876
Commercial 19.11 15,056,149 287,723
Industrial 19.11 2,491,784 47,618




9
 Residential Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration.
https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/



 Page 20 of 24

 Page 88
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS



3.7 Mobile Sources
On-Road Transportation

The GHG emissions for vehicles were based on the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and the GHG intensities of fuel
sources, including gasoline and diesel. As is standard for calculating VMT and tracking transportation sector
emissions, VMT numbers were based on the miles traveled within the boundaries of the City of Portland,
regardless of whether the vehicle owners reside in the city or not, or if the vehicles are purchased at dealers within
the city or not. Because pickup trucks are a common mode of transit in Maine, passenger vehicle VMT was broken
out between passenger vehicles and passenger trucks. SUVs are considered to be passenger trucks.

Data provided by the Greater Portland Council of Governments (GPCOG) was used to estimate the total VMT on
roads within the City of Portland, and from this, it was assumed that the total vehicle miles traveled in the city
during the calendar year of 2023 was 508,933,187 miles.

To estimate energy use and emissions, vehicle registration data was used to understand the registered vehicle
stock with the City of Portland. U.S. Department of Transportation and U.S. Energy Information Administration
data for the fuel economy of vehicles sold in each class and model year was matched to the registered vehicle
stock, and from this, weighted average fuel economy calculations were created for each vehicle class. Any
emissions resulting from the charging of electric vehicles was included under stationary sources and accounted for
in the electricity consumption data. The resulting table is shown below (Table 12).
Table 12. On-Road VMT and Fuels




Off-Road Transportation

Offroad transportation emissions were calculated for Portland International Jetport fleet vehicles, Casco Bay Lines
ferries, and visiting cruise ships (Table 13). Jetport fleet fuel consumption data for gasoline and diesel was



 Page 21 of 24

 Page 89
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


provided directly by Jetport staff. Similarly, Casco Bay Lines ferry fuel consumption for diesel and biodiesel was
provided directly by Casco Bay Lines staff. It is interesting to note that Casco Bay Lines will begin operating a new
hybrid electric-diesel ship in the near future.
Table 13. Off-Road Vehicles and Waterborne Transportation Fuel Use and GHG Emissions

 Fuel Use Fuel Use GHG
 Vehicle/Ship Location & Fuel Type
 (Variable Units) (MMBTU) (MTCO2e)

Cruise Ships - Electric (provided by diesel engines) 11,917,005 kWh 40,663 8,749
Casco Bay Lines - Diesel 261,307 Gal 36,199 2,700
Casco Bay Lines - BioDiesel 33,274 Gal 4,275 344
Jetport Fleet Vehicle - Gasoline 24,367 Gal 3,058 1,717
Jetport Fleet Vehicle - Diesel 10,315 Gal 1,429 765

While airport fleet and ferry consumption data were readily available, the energy consumption from visiting cruise
ships had to be estimated. Cruise ships maintain power while docked and, since they are within the city at the
time, are considered scope 1 emissions sources. Data on the number of cruise ship visits and total time docked
was provided by the City of Portland (Table 14).
Table 14. Cruise Ship Visits




To estimate emissions from docked cruise ships, a 2022 study of docked cruise ships was referenced from the Port
of Los Angeles Inventory of Air Emissions10. Energy consumed during harbor transit, maneuvering, and hoteling at
dock was considered. Cruise ships typically run two engines: an auxiliary diesel engine and an auxiliary boiler. For
each ship, the energy consumption (kW) of these auxiliary engines is estimated based on the passenger size class
and applied to the estimated time of visit. The total energy (kW) consumed by visiting cruise ships is summarized
in Table 15.




10
 Inventory of Air Emissions for Calendar Year 2022. Port of Los Angeles.
https://kentico.portoflosangeles.org/getmedia/409590b5-0e6a-4c15-8d9b-fcdb02624933/2022_Air_Emissions_Inventory



 Page 22 of 24

 Page 90
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS




Table 15. Ship Hotelling Energy Use Assumptions




Note that this is certainly not a complete picture of all off-road emissions in Portland. Additional off-road gasoline
and diesel use that is not included in the inventory due to a lack of available data may include, for example,
vehicles used in agriculture and maintenance vehicles for public spaces or private use. Emissions from passenger
and freight rail and from intracity aircraft, such as helicopters that depart and land within city limits, were also not
included due to limited data availability. These emissions are assumed to be negligible, and their omission is
consistent with the 2017 baseline inventory.


3.8 Waste and Wastewater
Waste emissions sources included municipal solid waste (MSW), biological waste (i.e., compost), and wastewater
process emissions. All MSW that is not recycled in Portland is collected and processed at the Ecomaine Waste-to-
Energy incineration plant in Portland. Only waste produced and disposed of within Portland is considered a source
of scope 1 emissions. Emissions from waste generated outside of Portland but incinerated at the Ecomaine plant
were not considered part of Portland’s inventory following the BASIC approach. The total volume of MSW
collected in Portland for the 2023 calendar year was provided directly by Ecomaine. Emissions were calculated
using the Incineration and Open Burning Emissions Calculator built into the CIRIS inventory tool, which assumes
the North American characterization and average distribution of waste types (e.g., paper, plastics) across the total
volume of MSW and applies emissions factors to each. The total volume of MSW collected and incinerated was
41,976 tons and the total emissions were 11,689 MTCO2e (Table 16).




 Page 23 of 24

 Page 91
 CITY OF PORTLAND | COMMUNITY INVENTORY OF 2023 GHG EMISSIONS


Table 16. Waste Disposal Volume and GHG Emissions




Food waste (i.e., compost) is collected from participating residents and businesses in Portland by Garbage to
Garden, which operates an anaerobic digester in a nearby town. Since this waste is generated in Portland, but
treated outside of Portland, it is considered a source of scope 3 emissions. Composted tonnage was provided
directly by Garbage to Garden, and total emissions were calculated using the PA’s Greenhouse Gas quivalencies
Calculator.11 The total volume of food waste composted was 1,024 tons and the total emissions were 163 MTCO2e
(Table 16).

Wastewater emissions are calculated for treatment process emissions only (i.e., GHG emissions produced from the
chemical breakdown of sewage). Wastewater energy use is included in the industrial energy use sector of the
inventory. Wastewater process emissions were modeled using the Wastewater Emissions Calculator in the CIRIS
tool based on the total population of the City of Portland and estimated to be 2,744 MTCO2e.




11
  Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-
gas-equivalencies-calculator



 Page 24 of 24

 Page 92