City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2025-03-18
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Tuesday, March 18, 2025

 10:00 AM
 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER
 ROOM 340, CITY HALL
 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President EUNISSES HERNANDEZ, First District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District ADRIN NAZARIAN, Second District
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY, Fifth District
 President Pro Tempore IMELDA PADILLA, Sixth District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District TRACI PARK, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 HUGO SOTO­MARTÍNEZ, Thirteenth District
 YSABEL JURADO, Fourteenth District
 TIM McOSKER, Fifteenth District
PUBLIC COMMENT AND LIVE BROADCAST


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.gov/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.

Tuesday
Telecommunication Relay Services - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 1
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 HUGO SOTO­MARTÍNEZ, Thirteenth District
 YSABEL JURADO, Fourteenth District
 TIM McOSKER, Fifteenth District
PUBLIC COMMENT AND LIVE BROADCAST


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.gov/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.


Telecommunication Relay Services


Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech
disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and
the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated
for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.


What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.


Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.


For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL


Spanish language interpretation is available at all Council and Committee meetings. Interpretation services in additional
languages are available upon request, at no cost. Please submit your request to clerk.interpretation@lacity.org as soon as
possible to allow time for scheduling. You will receive a confirmation reply if an interpreter is available.
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.gov or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
Tuesday
by a  Councilmember. If an item is called "special"- it will
 March  be 18, 2025
 "held" until -the remainder of the items on the Council
 PAGE 2
 agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL


Spanish language interpretation is available at all Council and Committee meetings. Interpretation services in additional
languages are available upon request, at no cost. Please submit your request to clerk.interpretation@lacity.org as soon as
possible to allow time for scheduling. You will receive a confirmation reply if an interpreter is available.
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.gov or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.


The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.


PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.


The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.


If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 3
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items Noticed for Public Hearing
(1) 24­0160­S94
 CD 12 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR
 OBJECTIONS to the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
 report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non­
Tuesday compliance of- code
 Marchviolations/Annual
 18, 2025 - Inspection costs, pursuantPAGE
 to Los4
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative Code
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items Noticed for Public Hearing
(1) 24­0160­S94
 CD 12 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR
 OBJECTIONS to the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
 report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non­
 compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative Code
 (LAAC), for the property located at 19031 West Superior Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to a proposed
 lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non­compliance of code
 violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC, and
 CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 19031 West Superior
 Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)


 (Continued from Council meeting of December 11, 2024)


(2) 24­1590
 CD 2 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
 and RESOLUTION relative to rejecting the offer for future alley as public
 alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue, Right of Way No. 36000­2462.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that this rejection of the offer for future alley as public alley is
 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(22) of the City's
 Environmental Guidelines.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 5
 and RESOLUTION relative to rejecting the offer for future alley as public
 alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue, Right of Way No. 36000­2462.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that this rejection of the offer for future alley as public alley is
 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(22) of the City's
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION rejecting the offer for
 future alley as public alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue as
 shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated December 10,
 2024, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition:

 That petitioner makes satisfactory arrangement with the Bureau of
 Engineering, Real Estate Division (RED) with respect to the
 payment of document recording fee.


 3. INSTRUCT the RED to record the Resolution with the Los Angeles
 County Recorder when the condition in Recommendation A of said
 City Engineer report has been complied with.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, following Council adoption, to
 forward the Resolution rejecting the offer for future alley as
 public alley to the RED for processing.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of
 $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40
 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(3) 24­0900­S65
 CD 13 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Waterloo Street and Reservoir Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 6
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(4) 24­0900­S66
 CD 2 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Elmer Avenue and Burbank Boulevard No. 2 Street
 Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(5) 24­0900­S67
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Pico Boulevard and Crescent Heights Boulevard Street
 Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.

Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 7
 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Pico Boulevard and Crescent Heights Boulevard Street
 Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(6) 24­0900­S68
 CD 1 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Carlyle Place and Carlyle Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(7) 24­0900­S69
 CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the East Downtown No. 1 Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 8
 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
(7) 24­0900­S69
 CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the East Downtown No. 1 Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(8) 24­0900­S70
 CD 13 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Doran Street and West San Fernando Road Street
 Lighting District.​

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment
 cannot be enacted.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE
 abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in
 accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).


 3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the
 streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if
 previously installed.


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(9) 24­0900­S71
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
Tuesday ORDINANCE -FIRST
 MarchCONSIDERATION
 18, 2025 - PAGE
 relative to the improvement and9
 3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the
 streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if
 previously installed.


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(9) 24­0900­S71
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Kelton Avenue and National Boulevard Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(10) 24­0900­S72
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the 112th Street and Compton Avenue Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 25, 2025)

Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 10
 (11) 24­0900­S73
 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 25, 2025)


(11) 24­0900­S73
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the 112th Street and Central Avenue Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 25, 2025)


(12) 24­0900­S74
 CD 6 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Lanark Street and Willis Avenue Street Lighting
 District.​

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment
 cannot be enacted.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE
 abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in
 accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 11
 1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment
 cannot be enacted.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE
 abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in
 accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).


 3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the
 streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if
 previously installed.


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)


(13) 25­0256
 CD 1 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HERNANDEZ ­
 RODRIGUEZ) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing one or more series of
 revenue bonds or notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
 $55,000,000 (Obligations) to finance and/or refinance the acquisition,
 rehabilitation, improvements, renovation, furnishing, and equipping of a
 238­unit multifamily rental housing project at 1501 Miramar Street in
 Council District One.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. CONSIDER the results, attached to the Motion, of the Tax Equity and
 Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), public hearing held on
 September 17, 2024.


 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, attached to the Motion,
 to allow the California Municipal Finance Authority to issue revenue
 bonds or notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
 $55,000,000 to finance and/or refinance the acquisition and
 rehabilitation of the 238­unit multifamily rental housing project at
 1501 Miramar Street in Council District One.


 (Continued from Council meeting of March 14, 2025)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(14) 24­0765
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a report on all
 existing City online budget engagement tools and provide a plan with
Tuesday - March
 recommendations 18, 2025 the
 to modernize - City's digital platforms. PAGE 12
 (Continued from Council meeting of March 14, 2025)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(14) 24­0765
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a report on all
 existing City online budget engagement tools and provide a plan with
 recommendations to modernize the City's digital platforms.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hernandez –
 Yaroslavsky):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance of the
 Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Community Investment for Families
 Department, Civil + Human Rights and Equity Department, Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment, Controller, City Clerk, and any relevant
 departments, to report to Council within 90 days on all existing City online
 budget engagement tools, including but not limited to, databases, surveys,
 training, websites, presentations, and methods for collecting public input,
 and provide a plan with recommendations to modernize the City's digital
 platforms and integrate community surveys, data collection strategies,
 data visualization, and online tools for the budget.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 (Government Operations Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter.)


(15) 25­0051
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the retention
 of Joel Selik, Esq. of San Marcos, CA to assist in judgment enforcement
 and collections in the litigation of People v. Polymer80, Inc., et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06257.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE a contract with Joel Selik, Esq. of San Marcos, CA on a
 contingency fee plus costs basis, to assist in judgment enforcement and
 collections in the litigation of People v. Polymer80, Inc., et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06257.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
Tuesday completed a -  March 18,
 financial 2025of- this report.
 analysis PAGE 13
 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE a contract with Joel Selik, Esq. of San Marcos, CA on a
 contingency fee plus costs basis, to assist in judgment enforcement and
 collections in the litigation of People v. Polymer80, Inc., et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06257.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(16) 25­0170
 CD 5 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to identifying
 emergency or other funds to repair West Caribou Lane between North
 Beverly Glen Boulevard and the Dead End, and recommendations
 necessary to appropriate the funding.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Yaroslavsky ­
 Raman):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to identify $140,000, in
 emergency or other funds, to repair West Caribou Lane between North
 Beverly Glen Boulevard and the Dead End; and, to report to Council with
 any recommendations necessary to appropriate the funding.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes

 For: Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council


(17) 23­1027­S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an analysis of
 potential impacts from switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year
 budget cycle, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Hernandez,
 Blumenfield – Padilla):


 1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance
 from the Department of Public Works, Controller, City Clerk, Chief
 Legislative Analyst (CLA), and other relevant departments, to report
 to Council within 90 days with an analysis of potential impacts from
 switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year budget cycle, as well
Tuesday as provide  recommendations
 - March  18, 2025 - for implementing a biennial and multi­
 PAGE 14
 year budget schedule, as well as the adoption of a Capital
 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Hernandez,
 Blumenfield – Padilla):


 1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance
 from the Department of Public Works, Controller, City Clerk, Chief
 Legislative Analyst (CLA), and other relevant departments, to report
 to Council within 90 days with an analysis of potential impacts from
 switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year budget cycle, as well
 as provide recommendations for implementing a biennial and multi­
 year budget schedule, as well as the adoption of a Capital
 Infrastructure Plan.


 2. INSTRUCT the CAO, with assistance from the Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment, Controller, CLA, and any relevant
 departments, to report to Council within 90 days with an analysis of
 current and past strategies for encouraging public participation in
 the annual budget process, their effectiveness including constituent
 reach, how these strategies compare with best practices of public
 participation in comparable local jurisdictions and
 municipalities; and, provide recommendations to strengthen existing
 or integrate new strategies to enhance public participation through
 changes in City policy, ordinance and/or Charter.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(18) 24­0600­S2
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to feasibility of
 funding from the Department of Airports for positions in the Department of
 City Planning (DCP) for the preparation of the Specific Plan for the Van
 Nuys Airport.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Padilla –
 Hernandez):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report to Council on
 the feasibility of the Department of Airports providing funding for one City
 Planner and two City Planning Associates in the DCP for the preparation
 of the Specific Plan for the Van Nuys Airport, and whether nine­months
 funding is still required for these positions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 15
 the feasibility of the Department of Airports providing funding for one City
 Planner and two City Planning Associates in the DCP for the preparation
 of the Specific Plan for the Van Nuys Airport, and whether nine­months
 funding is still required for these positions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(19) 19­0362­S1
 CD 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to authorization to negotiate and execute an exclusive negotiation
 agreement (ENA) and related contractual documents for the disposition
 and development of City property located at 5867 South Los Angeles
 Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Economic Workforce
 Development Department (EWDD), in consultation with the General
 Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), and the
 General Manager, Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP), or
 the respective designees, to negotiate and execute an ENA for a
 12­month period, with the option to extend the ENA for an additional
 12 months, depending on the due diligence period findings and the
 time required for environmental clearances and securing project
 entitlements, with The Bakewell Company of California, LLC; The
 Michaels Organization, and The Brotherhood Crusade, LLC to
 construct a mixed­use residential, recreational, retail, and
 commercial development, and a separate City­owned park
 (collectively, Slauson and Wall Project), located at 5867 South Los
 Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 90003, Assessor Parcel
 Number 6006­003­900 (Property).


 2. REQUEST the Bureau of Engineering and the Department of City
 Planning to work with the EWDD to divide the Property into a park
 parcel and a housing / commercial parcel.


 3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, in consultation with the
 General Manager, LAHD, and the General Manager, RAP, or their
 respective designees, to make technical corrections or adjustments
 that may be required and are consistent with this action.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Municipal Facilities Committee reports that
 approval of the recommendations in the report will not have an impact on
 the General Fund. The extent of any future impact on the General Fund is
 unknown at this time. A future report(s) may request authority from the City
Tuesday - March
 Council and the Mayor18,to2025 -
 execute agreements between the City PAGE and16
 3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, in consultation with the
 General Manager, LAHD, and the General Manager, RAP, or their
 respective designees, to make technical corrections or adjustments
 that may be required and are consistent with this action.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Municipal Facilities Committee reports that
 approval of the recommendations in the report will not have an impact on
 the General Fund. The extent of any future impact on the General Fund is
 unknown at this time. A future report(s) may request authority from the City
 Council and the Mayor to execute agreements between the City and
 Developer.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(20) 23­0957
 CD 15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to establishing the Pacific Avenue Corridor Jobs and Economic
 Development Incentive (JEDI) Zone, in Council District 15.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. DESIGNATE the Pacific Avenue Corridor, bounded by First Street
 to the north and Fourteenth Street to the south along Pacific Avenue,
 as a City of Los Angeles JEDI Zone (Pacific Corridor JEDI Zone) in
 Council District 15, for a period of five years.


 2. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD) to utilize existing resources allocated to Wilmington and
 Watts JEDI Zones to provide services and incentives in the newly
 established Pacific Avenue Corridor. The additional JEDI Zone will
 need to share the existing resources, business incentive plan, and
 services with the other established zones in the Council District.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The EWDD reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(21) 25­0154
 CD 15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to developing and executing a Request for Information to identify a qualified
 operator for the Watts Coffee House, located within City­owned property at
 1827 East 103rd Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker ­
 Hutt):
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 17
(21) 25­0154
 CD 15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to developing and executing a Request for Information to identify a qualified
 operator for the Watts Coffee House, located within City­owned property at
 1827 East 103rd Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker ­
 Hutt):


 1. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD) to develop and execute a Request for Information to
 identify a qualified operator for the Watts Coffee House located
 within City­owned property located at 1827 East 103rd Street, Los
 Angeles, California 90002 (Property), through a community­driven
 process and report to Council with its findings.


 2. INSTRUCT the Department of General Services, in coordination
 with the EWDD, to provide maintenance services to the Property as
 needed.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(22) 15­0241­S1
 CD 14 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the
 Downtown Center, Property­Based, Business Improvement District (BID).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that the FY 2025 APR for the Downtown Center BID, attached
 to the City Clerk report dated November 13, 2024, attached to the
 Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.


 2. FIND that the increase in the 2025 budget concurs with the
 intentions of the Downtown Center BID's Management District Plan
 and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed
 property owners.


 3. ADOPT said FY 2025 APR for the Downtown Center BID, pursuant
 to the State Law.

Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 18
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to
 2. FIND that the increase in the 2025 budget concurs with the
 intentions of the Downtown Center BID's Management District Plan
 and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed
 property owners.


 3. ADOPT said FY 2025 APR for the Downtown Center BID, pursuant
 to the State Law.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund associated with this action.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(23) 12­0139­S1
 CDs 1, 8, 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the
 Figueroa Corridor, Property­Based, Business Improvement District (BID).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that the FY 2025 APR for the Figueroa Corridor BID, attached
 to the City Clerk report dated November 20, 2024, attached to the
 Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.


 2. FIND that the increase in the 2025 budget concurs with the
 intentions of the Figueroa Corridor BID's Management District Plan
 and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed
 property owners.


 3. ADOPT said FY 2025 APR for the Figueroa Corridor BID, pursuant
 to the State Law.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund associated with this action.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(24) 14­0943
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943­S3

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 modifying the Management District Plan for the Los Angeles Tourism and
 Marketing District (LATMD).
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 19
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(24) 14­0943
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943­S3

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 modifying the Management District Plan for the Los Angeles Tourism and
 Marketing District (LATMD).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION dated February 20, 2025, attached to the Council file,
 modifying the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District Management
 District Plan.


 2. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, to schedule a public hearing before the
 City Council to consider modification of the Los Angeles Tourism
 and Marketing District’s Management District Plan.


 3. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City Clerk, to
 prepare an Ordinance authorizing modification of the Los Angeles
 Tourism and Marketing District’s Management District Plan for
 Council’s consideration during the required public hearing.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there are no City­
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 and therefore no assessments to be paid by the City.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(25) 14­0943­S3
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 establishing a Business Improvement District (BID) to be known as the Los
 Angeles Tourism Marketing District (LATMD) pursuant to the Provisions of
 the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18,
 Part 7, Streets and Highways Code, State of California) and to levy
 assessments.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


Tuesday 1. NOTE and- March
 FILE18,
 the2025  - City Clerk report dated February
 revised PAGE 20
 12,
 2025, attached to Council file No. 14­0943­S3.
 establishing a Business Improvement District (BID) to be known as the Los
 Angeles Tourism Marketing District (LATMD) pursuant to the Provisions of
 the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18,
 Part 7, Streets and Highways Code, State of California) and to levy
 assessments.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. NOTE and FILE the revised City Clerk report dated February 12,
 2025, attached to Council file No. 14­0943­S3.


 2. NOTE and FILE the revised draft Ordinance of Intention dated
 February 20, 2025, attached to said Council file.


 3. FIND that:

 a. The proposed BID is eligible for establishment pursuant to
 Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways
 Code.


 b. The assessments for the proposed business based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e).


 c. The petitions submitted on behalf of the proponents of the
 proposed Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District are signed
 by lodging business owners who will pay more than 50 percent
 of the assessments proposed to be levied.


 d. The marketing of the BID is a specific benefit for the lodging
 businesses with 50 rooms or more and exceeds the level of
 services provided by the City.


 e. The assessment dollars are used in a manner that creates a
 clear and direct link between the marketing service provided
 and the benefit to the assessed lodging business.


 f. No business other than the assessed lodging business will
 benefit from the assessment funded attendant marketing
 services and programs.


 g. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost to the local government of conferring the benefit.


Tuesday h. In -accordance  with -State Law and based on the facts
 March 18, 2025 PAGEand
 21
 conclusions contained in the Management District Plan,
 f. No business other than the assessed lodging business will
 benefit from the assessment funded attendant marketing
 services and programs.


 g. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost to the local government of conferring the benefit.


 h. In accordance with State Law and based on the facts and
 conclusions contained in the Management District Plan,
 attached to said Council file, the assessment levied on each
 lodging business shall not be used to provide improvements
 or activities outside the BID or for any other purpose other than
 those described in the Management District Plan and does
 not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional specific
 benefit conferred on that lodging business.


 i. All lodging businesses with 50 rooms or more that will have a
 specific benefit conferred upon them by the improvements and
 activities provided and upon which an assessment would be
 imposed are those as identified in the Management District
 Plan and Engineer’s Report.


 j. In accordance with State Law, the benefits and services
 provided by the BID to lodging businesses with 50 rooms or
 more within established business improvement districts in the
 City of Los Angeles are separate and distinct from the
 benefits provided by other business improvement districts.


 k. The City Clerk, or designee, will collect the assessments.


 l. The City Clerk, or designee, shall be allowed to review or audit
 the financial records of the owners’ association and all lodging
 businesses as necessary to ensure accurate collection and
 expenditure of the assessments.


 m. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day to day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 4. ADOPT the Preliminary Report of the City Clerk, attached to
 said Council file.


 5. ADOPT the Management District Plan dated February 12, 2025,
 attached to said Council file.


Tuesday 6. ADOPT-the Engineer’s
 March Report
 18, 2025 - dated February 12, 2025, attached
 PAGE 22
 to said Council file.
 Angeles.


 4. ADOPT the Preliminary Report of the City Clerk, attached to
 said Council file.


 5. ADOPT the Management District Plan dated February 12, 2025,
 attached to said Council file.


 6. ADOPT the Engineer’s Report dated February 12, 2025, attached
 to said Council file.


 7. PRESENT and ADOPT the revised ORDINANCE OF INTENTION
 dated February 27, 2025, attached to the Council file, to establish a
 BID to be known as the "Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District”
 pursuant to the Provisions of the Property and Business
 Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18, Part 7, Streets and
 Highways Code, State of California), and to levy assessments.


 8. DIRECT the City Clerk to comply with the notice, protest, and
 hearing procedures prescribed in the California Government Code,
 Section 54954.6.


 9. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to release a Request For Proposals for
 auditing services; enter into a contract with the selected vendors and
 execute individual Task Orders as needed for auditing purposes of
 the hotels and other business improvement districts in an aggregate
 amount not to exceed $172,000 for a three­year period.


 10. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City Clerk, to
 prepare an enabling Ordinance establishing the Los Angeles
 Tourism Marketing District for City Council consideration at the
 conclusion of the required public hearing.


 11. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, upon establishment of the District, to
 prepare, execute and administer a contract between the City of Los
 Angeles and the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District
 Corporation for the administration of the District’s programs.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there are no City­
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 to be assessed and therefore no impact on the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(26) 21­1155
 CD 14 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
Tuesday ORDINANCE -OF March 18, 2025 FIRST
 INTENTION - CONSIDERATION relative  PAGE 23
 to the
 reconfirmation of the Little Tokyo, Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there are no City­
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 to be assessed and therefore no impact on the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(26) 21­1155
 CD 14 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
 reconfirmation of the Little Tokyo, Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that:

 a. The assessments imposed by the Little Tokyo BID for the
 2025 FY provide services that directly benefit each of the
 businesses which pay the assessments.


 b. The services funded by the assessment are provided only to
 each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries of the
 BID.


 c. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost of conferring the benefits.


 d. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day­to­day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 e. The assessments for the proposed business­based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e)(1).


 f. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association, the
 Little Tokyo Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


Tuesday 2. PRESENT and18,
 - March ADOPT
 2025 -the accompanying ORDINANCE PAGEOF24
 INTENTION, dated December 5, 2024, confirming the Little Tokyo
 f. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association, the
 Little Tokyo Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated December 5, 2024, confirming the Little Tokyo
 BID Annual Report, levying an annual assessment for the Little Tokyo
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­second operating year,
 January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail the
 public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of Section
 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling Ordinance levying the
 special assessment for the Little Tokyo BID’s twenty­third operating
 period beginning January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 5. APPROVE the Little Tokyo Business Association. to administer the
 proposed services of the Little Tokyo BID pursuant to Section 36500
 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and City
 regulations.


 6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to
 prepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City and
 the Little Tokyo Business Association to administer the Little Tokyo
 BID, if the Ordinance reconfirming the BID is adopted.


 7. APPOINT the Advisory Board as detailed in the Little Tokyo BID
 2025 Annual Report, included as an Attachment of the City Clerk
 report dated November 27, 2024, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact on
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(27) 13­0765­S1
 CD 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
Tuesday reconfirmation -ofMarch
 the Chatsworth,
 18, 2025 - Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 PAGE 25
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact on
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(27) 13­0765­S1
 CD 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
 reconfirmation of the Chatsworth, Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that:

 a. The assessments imposed by the Chatsworth BID for the
 2025 FY provide services that directly benefit each of the
 businesses which pay the assessments.


 b. The services funded by the assessment are provided only to
 each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries of the
 BID.


 c. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost of conferring the benefits.


 d. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day­to­day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 e. The assessments for the proposed business­based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e)(1).


 f. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association, the
 Chatsworth Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated January 28, 2025, confirming the Chatsworth BID
Tuesday Annual -Report,
 March 18,  2025
 levying an- annual assessment for the Chatsworth
 PAGE 26
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­third operating year, January
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated January 28, 2025, confirming the Chatsworth BID
 Annual Report, levying an annual assessment for the Chatsworth
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­third operating year, January
 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail the
 public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of Section
 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling Ordinance levying the
 special assessment for the Chatsworth BID’s twenty­third operating
 period beginning January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 5. APPROVE the Chatsworth B.I.D., Inc. to administer the proposed
 services of the Chatsworth BID pursuant to Section 36500 et seq. of
 the California Streets and Highways Code and City regulations.


 6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to
 prepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City and
 the Chatsworth B.I.D., Inc. to administer the Chatsworth BID, if the
 Ordinance reconfirming the BID is adopted.


 7. APPOINT the Advisory Board as detailed in the Chatsworth
 BID 2025 Annual Report, included as an Attachment of the City
 Clerk report dated January 21, 2025, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact on
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(28) 14­1635­S10
 HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the
 Home­sharing vendor evaluation, process enhancements, compliance
 strategies, and staffing needs for home­sharing and residential hotels
 enforcement; and related matters.

Tuesday - March
 Recommendations for 18, 2025action:
 Council  - PAGE 27
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(28) 14­1635­S10
 HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the
 Home­sharing vendor evaluation, process enhancements, compliance
 strategies, and staffing needs for home­sharing and residential hotels
 enforcement; and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. NOTE and FILE the Department of City Planning (DCP) reports
 dated October 4, 2023, March 13, 2024, and November 1, 2024,
 attached the Council file, relative to the home­sharing vendor
 evaluation, process enhancements, compliance strategies, and
 staffing needs for home­sharing and residential hotels enforcement;
 and related matters.


 2. NOTE and FILE the City Attorney report dated November 26, 2024,
 attached to the Council file, relative to the Home Sharing Ordinance
 enforcement.


 3. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD)
 report dated November 27, 2024, attached to the Council file,
 relative to additional recommendations regarding staffing needs for
 effective home­sharing enforcement.


 4. REQUEST the City Attorney, in consultation with the DCP and other
 relevant departments, to report to Council on the selection,
 appointment, retention and hiring of qualified hearing officers to
 conduct Administrative Citation Enforcement Program (ACE)
 related hearings in order to strengthen and create efficiency in the
 current program.


 5. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and
 other relevant departments, to prepare and present an amendment
 to the Ordinance to require that the LAHD and Los Angeles
 Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) conduct property
 inspections prior to permit issuance.


 6. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and
 other relevant departments, to prepare and present an amendment
 to the Ordinance to require that platforms conduct an electronic
 verification of listings prior to booking transactions, similar to New
 York City’s program.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back on the feasibility of identifying
Tuesday and monitoring,
 - March on18,no less- than a yearly basis, the City’s Mixed
 2025 PAGEUse
 28
 Residential Hotel stock, that include both tourist units (which are
 inspections prior to permit issuance.


 6. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and
 other relevant departments, to prepare and present an amendment
 to the Ordinance to require that platforms conduct an electronic
 verification of listings prior to booking transactions, similar to New
 York City’s program.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back on the feasibility of identifying
 and monitoring, on no less than a yearly basis, the City’s Mixed Use
 Residential Hotel stock, that include both tourist units (which are
 short­term) and residential units (which are long­term), with
 recommendations for stricter enforcement approaches for this
 protected housing stock.


 8. R E S O L V E t h a t t h e L A H D , L A D B S , a n d o t h e r e n f o r c i n g
 departments, in consultation with the City Attorney, should use the
 administrative fine amounts specified by Chapter 1, Article 1.2,
 Section 11.2.04(a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) for
 violations of the Home Sharing Ordinance where applicable.


 9. INSTRUCT the CAO and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), in
 consultation with the DCP, LADBS, LAHD, City Attorney, and any
 other relevant departments, to report to Council for additional
 staffing and resources required across departments for any
 amendments to the Home­Sharing Ordinance to support
 enforcement.


 10. INSTRUCT the CAO and the CLA, in consultation with the DCP,
 LADBS, LAHD, City Attorney, and any other relevant departments,
 to report to Council on options for creating a single office, division,
 or department related to Home­Sharing administration and
 enforcement, Party House enforcement, and enforcement of other
 related commercial activities on residential properties, which
 includes a recommended organizational structure, staffing plan, and
 funding, including the impacts of existing vacant positions, and
 funding needed to effectively resource the program. This should
 include a consideration of moving complaint investigation and
 citation defense from the DCP to other departments.


 11. INSTRUCT the DCP, in consultation with the City Attorney and the
 CAO, to prepare and present a fee study updating the LAMC 19.01
 T. Home­Sharing Registration and Renewal Fees and LAMC
 Section 12.22.A.32(e)(5) Home­Sharing per­night fee to reflect full
 cost recovery.


 12. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft a Private Right of Action clause
 for the City's Home­Sharing Ordinance that would allow any
 interested party to pursue Private Right of Action to enforce the law
Tuesday when unlawful
 - Marchactivities
 18, 2025occur,
 - potentially modeled after the  False
 PAGE 29
 Claims Act to allow a person to bring an action on behalf of the City,
 11. INSTRUCT the DCP, in consultation with the City Attorney and the
 CAO, to prepare and present a fee study updating the LAMC 19.01
 T. Home­Sharing Registration and Renewal Fees and LAMC
 Section 12.22.A.32(e)(5) Home­Sharing per­night fee to reflect full
 cost recovery.


 12. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft a Private Right of Action clause
 for the City's Home­Sharing Ordinance that would allow any
 interested party to pursue Private Right of Action to enforce the law
 when unlawful activities occur, potentially modeled after the False
 Claims Act to allow a person to bring an action on behalf of the City,
 give the City an opportunity to intervene to ensure its interests are
 adequately represented; and allow the person bringing the action to
 share a portion of the damages, fines or penalties imposed.


 13. INSTRUCT the Office of Finance to report to Council on potential tax
 revenue loss if the City disallowed Extended Home­Sharing
 registrations.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that the report is provided for
 informational purposes, and as such, there is no impact to the General
 Fund. However, additional funding would be required to support the
 necessary resources identified in this report, and given that there are
 limited enforcement resources currently available in the Home­Sharing
 Rental Enforcement Trust Fund (Ordinance No. 186197; Council file No.
 14­1635­S7), a new fee study analyzing both the registration and Per
 Night Fee would be required.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes

 For if Amended:
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 NC Westchester/Playa

 For:
 Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council
 Empowerment Congress West Area Neighborhood Council
 Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council




 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter.)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
(29) 20­1572­S1
Tuesday CD 3 COMMUNICATION FROM
 - March THE -CITY ENGINEER relative to the final
 18, 2025 PAGE map
 30
 of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018­4978, located at 7329 and 7331 North Kelvin
 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter.)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
(29) 20­1572­S1
 CD 3 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018­4978, located at 7329 and 7331 North Kelvin
 Avenue, northerly of Sherman Way.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018­4978, located at
 7329 and 7331 North Kelvin Avenue, northerly of Sherman Way and
 accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with
 security documents.

 (Bond No. C­147008)
 Owner: Muhammad Faisal; Surveyor: Karen Korganyan

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map
 pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No
 additional City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(30) 18­0611­S4
 CD 2 COMMUNICATION FROM PROPOSITION K – L.A. FOR KIDS STEERING
 COMMITTEE and RESOLUTION relative to authorizing a grant application
 under Measure A Acquisition­Only Competitive Grant Program for the
 acquisition of Strathern Park West.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) to
 submit a grant application as detailed in the project list
 (Attachment), attached to the Proposition K – L.A. For Kids Steering
 Committee report dated March 4, 2025 (Steering Committee
 report), attached to the Council file, to the County of Los Angeles
 Regional Park and Open Space District (RPOSD) under the
 Measure A 2024 Competitive Acquisition Only Program for the
 acquisition of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
 owned land at Strathern Park West (Project).


Tuesday - March
 2. AUTHORIZE 18,
 the 2025 - Manager, RAP, to accept the RPOSD
 General PAGE 31
 grant funds for the Project and execute the grant agreement
 submit a grant application as detailed in the project list
 (Attachment), attached to the Proposition K – L.A. For Kids Steering
 Committee report dated March 4, 2025 (Steering Committee
 report), attached to the Council file, to the County of Los Angeles
 Regional Park and Open Space District (RPOSD) under the
 Measure A 2024 Competitive Acquisition Only Program for the
 acquisition of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
 owned land at Strathern Park West (Project).


 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, RAP, to accept the RPOSD
 grant funds for the Project and execute the grant agreement
 attached to said Steering Committee report, attached to the Council
 file, with substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in
 the Attachment, for the grant amount, scope, and the
 grant performance period for the Project, subject to the approval of
 the Mayor and City Council pursuant to Section 14.6(c) of the Los
 Angeles Administrative Code and approval as to the form of the
 grant agreement by the City Attorney.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION included as Attachment 3
 of said Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.


 4. SUBMIT RAP’s grant request to the Arts, Parks, Libraries, and
 Community Enrichment Committee in accordance with City Council
 instructions (Council file No. 18­0611), and to the Mayor and City
 Council for approval pursuant to Section 14.6(c) of the Los
 Angeles Administrative Code.


 5. AUTHORIZE the RAP to make necessary technical adjustments to
 the Grant application as necessary to carry out the intent of said
 Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Proposition K – L.A. for Kids Steering
 Committee reports that there is no anticipated General Fund impact.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Arts, Parks, Libraries, and Community Enrichment Committee
 waived consideration of the above matter)


(31) 25­0242
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
 (BOARD) relative to a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000 to help
 fund the Los Angeles Women Police Officers and Associates (LAWPOA)
 29th Annual Symposium 2025.

 Recommendation for Council action:
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 32
 ACCEPT a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000, from the Los
 waived consideration of the above matter)


(31) 25­0242
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
 (BOARD) relative to a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000 to help
 fund the Los Angeles Women Police Officers and Associates (LAWPOA)
 29th Annual Symposium 2025.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 ACCEPT a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000, from the Los
 Angeles Police Foundation, to help fund the LAWPOA 29th Annual
 Symposium 2025; and THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Public Safety Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter)



Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Closed Session
(32) 24­1393
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Adam Hollands v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. BC684154. (This matter arises from alleged
 disability discrimination and failure to accommodate and engage in the
 interactive process that occurred between 2007 to 2017 within the Los
 Angeles Police Department, and retaliation for reporting the allegations to
 management.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)


(33) 24­0903
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Stephanie Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02640. (This matter arises from
Tuesday - Marcha18,
 an incident involving 2025 -of the Los Angeles Fire Department
 member PAGE 33
 that
 management.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)


(33) 24­0903
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Stephanie Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02640. (This matter arises from
 an incident involving a member of the Los Angeles Fire Department that
 occurred on May 22, 2021.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter in Closed
 Session on March 4, 2025.)


(34) 24­1508
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Margarito T. Lopez, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,
 United States District Court Case No. 2:22­cv­07534­FLA­MAAx. (This
 matter arises from an officer­involved shooting which occurred on
 December 18, 2021, in the Los Angeles Police Department Newton
 Division of the City of Los Angeles.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)


(35) 25­0133
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Andrea R. Naaktgeboren v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,
 Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV20386. (This matter arises
 from a vehicle versus vehicle collision that occurred on January 24, 2023,
 at the intersection of 1st Street and South Beaudry Avenue, in Los
 Angeles, California.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)


(36) 25­0131
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Dartanyan Wallace v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV10324. (This matter arises from
 a June 2, 2022, automobile accident near the intersection of Cassil Place
 and Sunset Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 34
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Dartanyan Wallace v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV10324. (This matter arises from
 a June 2, 2022, automobile accident near the intersection of Cassil Place
 and Sunset Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)



Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000).




Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 35

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Tuesday, March 18, 2025
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)
 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)
 Roll Call
 Members Present: Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr., Raman,
 Soto­Martínez, Yaroslavsky (10); Absent: Blumenfield, Hernandez, Lee, Padilla, Rodriguez (5)
 Approval of the Minutes
 Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED
 Multiple Agenda Item Comment
 Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council
 Items Noticed for Public Hearing ­ PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED




(1) 24­0160­S94
 CD 12 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTEST, APPEALS OR
 OBJECTIONS to the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
 report and confirmation of lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non­
 compliance of code violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) and/or Los Angeles Administrative Code
 (LAAC), for the property located at 19031 West Superior Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 HEAR PROTEST, APPEALS OR OBJECTIONS relative to a proposed
 lien for nuisance abatement costs and/or non­compliance of code
 violations/Annual Inspection costs, pursuant to LAMC and/or LAAC, and
 CONFIRM said lien for the property located at 19031 West Superior
 Street. (Lien: $1,276.56)


 (Continued from Council meeting of December 11, 2024)

 Adopted to Continue Item to May 6, 2025
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(2) 24­1590
 CD 2 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Tuesday and RESOLUTION - March 18, 2025
 relative to -
 rejecting the offer for future alley asPAGE
 public1
 alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue, Right of Way No. 36000­2462.
 (Continued from Council meeting of December 11, 2024)

 Adopted to Continue Item to May 6, 2025
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(2) 24­1590
 CD 2 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
 and RESOLUTION relative to rejecting the offer for future alley as public
 alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue, Right of Way No. 36000­2462.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that this rejection of the offer for future alley as public alley is
 categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
 of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(22) of the City's
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION rejecting the offer for
 future alley as public alley located on 6900 Van Noord Avenue as
 shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated December 10,
 2024, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition:

 That petitioner makes satisfactory arrangement with the Bureau of
 Engineering, Real Estate Division (RED) with respect to the
 payment of document recording fee.


 3. INSTRUCT the RED to record the Resolution with the Los Angeles
 County Recorder when the condition in Recommendation A of said
 City Engineer report has been complied with.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, following Council adoption, to
 forward the Resolution rejecting the offer for future alley as
 public alley to the RED for processing.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of
 $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40
 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 Adopted Item as Amended by Motion 2A (Nazarian – Hernandez) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 2
 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 Adopted Item as Amended by Motion 2A (Nazarian – Hernandez) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)



(3) 24­0900­S65
 CD 13 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Waterloo Street and Reservoir Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(4) 24­0900­S66
 CD 2 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Elmer Avenue and Burbank Boulevard No. 2 Street
 Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
Tuesday district, -inMarch 18, 2025
 accordance  with- Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 PAGE 3
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(5) 24­0900­S67
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Pico Boulevard and Crescent Heights Boulevard Street
 Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(6) 24­0900­S68
 CD 1 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
Tuesday ORDINANCE -FIRST
 March 18, 2025 -
 CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement PAGE
 and4
 maintenance of the Carlyle Place and Carlyle Street Lighting District.
 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(6) 24­0900­S68
 CD 1 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Carlyle Place and Carlyle Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(7) 24­0900­S69
 CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the East Downtown No. 1 Street Lighting District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


Tuesday - March
 (Continued from 18, 2025
 Council -
 meeting of February 11, 2025) PAGE 5
 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(8) 24­0900­S70
 CD 13 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Doran Street and West San Fernando Road Street
 Lighting District.​

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment
 cannot be enacted.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE
 abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in
 accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).


 3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the
 streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if
 previously installed.


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)


Tuesday
 (9) 24­0900­S71 - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 6
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(9) 24­0900­S71
 CD 5 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Kelton Avenue and National Boulevard Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(10) 24­0900­S72
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the 112th Street and Compton Avenue Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
Tuesday - March 18,
 Administrative 2025
 Code - Government Code Section PAGE
 and 537537
 (Proposition 218).​
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 25, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(11) 24­0900­S73
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the 112th Street and Central Avenue Street Lighting
 District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the
 assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting
 district, in accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).​


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 25, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(12) 24­0900­S74
 CD 6 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
Tuesday maintenance -of
 March  18, 2025
 the Lanark -
 Street PAGE 8
 and Willis Avenue Street Lighting
 District.​
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(12) 24­0900­S74
 CD 6 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and
 maintenance of the Lanark Street and Willis Avenue Street Lighting
 District.​

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting
 Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment
 cannot be enacted.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE
 abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in
 accordance with Sections 6.95­6.127 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753
 (Proposition 218).


 3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the
 streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if
 previously installed.


 (Continued from Council meeting of February 11, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(13) 25­0256
 CD 1 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HERNANDEZ ­
 RODRIGUEZ) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing one or more series of
 revenue bonds or notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
 $55,000,000 (Obligations) to finance and/or refinance the acquisition,
 rehabilitation, improvements, renovation, furnishing, and equipping of a
 238­unit multifamily rental housing project at 1501 Miramar Street in
 Council District One.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

Tuesday 1. CONSIDER- March
 the 18, 2025 -
 results, PAGE
 attached to the Motion, of the Tax Equity and9
 Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), public hearing held on
 RODRIGUEZ) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing one or more series of
 revenue bonds or notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
 $55,000,000 (Obligations) to finance and/or refinance the acquisition,
 rehabilitation, improvements, renovation, furnishing, and equipping of a
 238­unit multifamily rental housing project at 1501 Miramar Street in
 Council District One.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. CONSIDER the results, attached to the Motion, of the Tax Equity and
 Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), public hearing held on
 September 17, 2024.


 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, attached to the Motion,
 to allow the California Municipal Finance Authority to issue revenue
 bonds or notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
 $55,000,000 to finance and/or refinance the acquisition and
 rehabilitation of the 238­unit multifamily rental housing project at
 1501 Miramar Street in Council District One.


 (Continued from Council meeting of March 14, 2025)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
(14) 24­0765
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a report on all
 existing City online budget engagement tools and provide a plan with
 recommendations to modernize the City's digital platforms.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Hernandez –
 Yaroslavsky):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance of the
 Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Community Investment for Families
 Department, Civil + Human Rights and Equity Department, Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment, Controller, City Clerk, and any relevant
 departments, to report to Council within 90 days on all existing City online
 budget engagement tools, including but not limited to, databases, surveys,
 training, websites, presentations, and methods for collecting public input,
 and provide a plan with recommendations to modernize the City's digital
 platforms and integrate community surveys, data collection strategies,
 data visualization, and online tools for the budget.


Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 10
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), Community Investment for Families
 Department, Civil + Human Rights and Equity Department, Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment, Controller, City Clerk, and any relevant
 departments, to report to Council within 90 days on all existing City online
 budget engagement tools, including but not limited to, databases, surveys,
 training, websites, presentations, and methods for collecting public input,
 and provide a plan with recommendations to modernize the City's digital
 platforms and integrate community surveys, data collection strategies,
 data visualization, and online tools for the budget.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 (Government Operations Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter.)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(15) 25­0051
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the retention
 of Joel Selik, Esq. of San Marcos, CA to assist in judgment enforcement
 and collections in the litigation of People v. Polymer80, Inc., et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06257.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE a contract with Joel Selik, Esq. of San Marcos, CA on a
 contingency fee plus costs basis, to assist in judgment enforcement and
 collections in the litigation of People v. Polymer80, Inc., et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 21STCV06257.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

 (16) 25­0170
Tuesday CD 5 BUDGET AND- March 18, 2025
 FINANCE -
 COMMITTEE PAGE 11
 REPORT relative to identifying
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(16) 25­0170
 CD 5 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to identifying
 emergency or other funds to repair West Caribou Lane between North
 Beverly Glen Boulevard and the Dead End, and recommendations
 necessary to appropriate the funding.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Yaroslavsky ­
 Raman):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to identify $140,000, in
 emergency or other funds, to repair West Caribou Lane between North
 Beverly Glen Boulevard and the Dead End; and, to report to Council with
 any recommendations necessary to appropriate the funding.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes

 For: Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(17) 23­1027­S3
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an analysis of
 potential impacts from switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year
 budget cycle, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Hernandez,
 Blumenfield – Padilla):


 1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance
 from the Department of Public Works, Controller, City Clerk, Chief
 Legislative Analyst (CLA), and other relevant departments, to report
 to Council within 90 days with an analysis of potential impacts from
 switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year budget cycle, as well
 as provide recommendations for implementing a biennial and multi­
 year budget schedule, as well as the adoption of a Capital
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 12
 Infrastructure Plan.
 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Hernandez,
 Blumenfield – Padilla):


 1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance
 from the Department of Public Works, Controller, City Clerk, Chief
 Legislative Analyst (CLA), and other relevant departments, to report
 to Council within 90 days with an analysis of potential impacts from
 switching to a two­year (biennial) or multi­year budget cycle, as well
 as provide recommendations for implementing a biennial and multi­
 year budget schedule, as well as the adoption of a Capital
 Infrastructure Plan.


 2. INSTRUCT the CAO, with assistance from the Department of
 Neighborhood Empowerment, Controller, CLA, and any relevant
 departments, to report to Council within 90 days with an analysis of
 current and past strategies for encouraging public participation in
 the annual budget process, their effectiveness including constituent
 reach, how these strategies compare with best practices of public
 participation in comparable local jurisdictions and
 municipalities; and, provide recommendations to strengthen existing
 or integrate new strategies to enhance public participation through
 changes in City policy, ordinance and/or Charter.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(18) 24­0600­S2
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to feasibility of
 funding from the Department of Airports for positions in the Department of
 City Planning (DCP) for the preparation of the Specific Plan for the Van
 Nuys Airport.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Padilla –
 Hernandez):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report to Council on
 the feasibility of the Department of Airports providing funding for one City
 Planner and two City Planning Associates in the DCP for the preparation
 of the Specific Plan for the Van Nuys Airport, and whether nine­months
 funding is still required for these positions.


Tuesday Fiscal Impact- Statement:
 March 18, 2025  - the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Neither PAGE 13
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Padilla –
 Hernandez):

 INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to report to Council on
 the feasibility of the Department of Airports providing funding for one City
 Planner and two City Planning Associates in the DCP for the preparation
 of the Specific Plan for the Van Nuys Airport, and whether nine­months
 funding is still required for these positions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(19) 19­0362­S1
 CD 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to authorization to negotiate and execute an exclusive negotiation
 agreement (ENA) and related contractual documents for the disposition
 and development of City property located at 5867 South Los Angeles
 Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Economic Workforce
 Development Department (EWDD), in consultation with the General
 Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), and the
 General Manager, Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP), or
 the respective designees, to negotiate and execute an ENA for a
 12­month period, with the option to extend the ENA for an additional
 12 months, depending on the due diligence period findings and the
 time required for environmental clearances and securing project
 entitlements, with The Bakewell Company of California, LLC; The
 Michaels Organization, and The Brotherhood Crusade, LLC to
 construct a mixed­use residential, recreational, retail, and
 commercial development, and a separate City­owned park
 (collectively, Slauson and Wall Project), located at 5867 South Los
 Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 90003, Assessor Parcel
 Number 6006­003­900 (Property).


 2. REQUEST the Bureau of Engineering and the Department of City
 Planning to work with the EWDD to divide the Property into a park
 parcel and a housing / commercial parcel.


 3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, in consultation with the
Tuesday General- March  18,LAHD,
 Manager, 2025 -and the General Manager, RAP, or PAGE  14
 their
 respective designees, to make technical corrections or adjustments
 (collectively, Slauson and Wall Project), located at 5867 South Los
 Angeles Street, Los Angeles, California 90003, Assessor Parcel
 Number 6006­003­900 (Property).


 2. REQUEST the Bureau of Engineering and the Department of City
 Planning to work with the EWDD to divide the Property into a park
 parcel and a housing / commercial parcel.


 3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, EWDD, in consultation with the
 General Manager, LAHD, and the General Manager, RAP, or their
 respective designees, to make technical corrections or adjustments
 that may be required and are consistent with this action.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Municipal Facilities Committee reports that
 approval of the recommendations in the report will not have an impact on
 the General Fund. The extent of any future impact on the General Fund is
 unknown at this time. A future report(s) may request authority from the City
 Council and the Mayor to execute agreements between the City and
 Developer.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(20) 23­0957
 CD 15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to establishing the Pacific Avenue Corridor Jobs and Economic
 Development Incentive (JEDI) Zone, in Council District 15.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. DESIGNATE the Pacific Avenue Corridor, bounded by First Street
 to the north and Fourteenth Street to the south along Pacific Avenue,
 as a City of Los Angeles JEDI Zone (Pacific Corridor JEDI Zone) in
 Council District 15, for a period of five years.


 2. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD) to utilize existing resources allocated to Wilmington and
 Watts JEDI Zones to provide services and incentives in the newly
 established Pacific Avenue Corridor. The additional JEDI Zone will
 need to share the existing resources, business incentive plan, and
 services with the other established zones in the Council District.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The EWDD reports that there is no impact to the
Tuesday General Fund.- March 18, 2025 - PAGE 15
 2. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD) to utilize existing resources allocated to Wilmington and
 Watts JEDI Zones to provide services and incentives in the newly
 established Pacific Avenue Corridor. The additional JEDI Zone will
 need to share the existing resources, business incentive plan, and
 services with the other established zones in the Council District.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The EWDD reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(21) 25­0154
 CD 15 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to developing and executing a Request for Information to identify a qualified
 operator for the Watts Coffee House, located within City­owned property at
 1827 East 103rd Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (McOsker ­
 Hutt):


 1. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD) to develop and execute a Request for Information to
 identify a qualified operator for the Watts Coffee House located
 within City­owned property located at 1827 East 103rd Street, Los
 Angeles, California 90002 (Property), through a community­driven
 process and report to Council with its findings.


 2. INSTRUCT the Department of General Services, in coordination
 with the EWDD, to provide maintenance services to the Property as
 needed.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
Tuesday Rodriguez (4) - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 16
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(22) 15­0241­S1
 CD 14 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the
 Downtown Center, Property­Based, Business Improvement District (BID).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that the FY 2025 APR for the Downtown Center BID, attached
 to the City Clerk report dated November 13, 2024, attached to the
 Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.


 2. FIND that the increase in the 2025 budget concurs with the
 intentions of the Downtown Center BID's Management District Plan
 and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed
 property owners.


 3. ADOPT said FY 2025 APR for the Downtown Center BID, pursuant
 to the State Law.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund associated with this action.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(23) 12­0139­S1
 CDs 1, 8, 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the
 Figueroa Corridor, Property­Based, Business Improvement District (BID).

 Recommendations for Council action:

Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 17
 1. FIND that the FY 2025 APR for the Figueroa Corridor BID, attached
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(23) 12­0139­S1
 CDs 1, 8, 9 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative
 to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report (APR) for the
 Figueroa Corridor, Property­Based, Business Improvement District (BID).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. FIND that the FY 2025 APR for the Figueroa Corridor BID, attached
 to the City Clerk report dated November 20, 2024, attached to the
 Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.


 2. FIND that the increase in the 2025 budget concurs with the
 intentions of the Figueroa Corridor BID's Management District Plan
 and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed
 property owners.


 3. ADOPT said FY 2025 APR for the Figueroa Corridor BID, pursuant
 to the State Law.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund associated with this action.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

(24) 14­0943
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943­S3

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 modifying the Management District Plan for the Los Angeles Tourism and
 Marketing District (LATMD).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION dated February 20, 2025, attached to the Council file,
 modifying the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District Management
 District Plan.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 18
 Marketing District (LATMD).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION dated February 20, 2025, attached to the Council file,
 modifying the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District Management
 District Plan.


 2. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, to schedule a public hearing before the
 City Council to consider modification of the Los Angeles Tourism
 and Marketing District’s Management District Plan.


 3. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City Clerk, to
 prepare an Ordinance authorizing modification of the Los Angeles
 Tourism and Marketing District’s Management District Plan for
 Council’s consideration during the required public hearing.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there are no City­
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 and therefore no assessments to be paid by the City.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report; Ordinance held over
 to March 25, 2025 for second consideration
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

 Adopted to Reconsider Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report and Ordinance
 Forthwith
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(25) 14­0943­S3
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 establishing a Business Improvement District (BID) to be known as the Los
 Angeles Tourism Marketing District (LATMD) pursuant to the Provisions of
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 19
 the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18,
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(25) 14­0943­S3
 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 14­0943

 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to
 establishing a Business Improvement District (BID) to be known as the Los
 Angeles Tourism Marketing District (LATMD) pursuant to the Provisions of
 the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18,
 Part 7, Streets and Highways Code, State of California) and to levy
 assessments.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. NOTE and FILE the revised City Clerk report dated February 12,
 2025, attached to Council file No. 14­0943­S3.


 2. NOTE and FILE the revised draft Ordinance of Intention dated
 February 20, 2025, attached to said Council file.


 3. FIND that:

 a. The proposed BID is eligible for establishment pursuant to
 Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways
 Code.


 b. The assessments for the proposed business based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e).


 c. The petitions submitted on behalf of the proponents of the
 proposed Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District are signed
 by lodging business owners who will pay more than 50 percent
 of the assessments proposed to be levied.


 d. The marketing of the BID is a specific benefit for the lodging
 businesses with 50 rooms or more and exceeds the level of
 services provided by the City.


 e. The assessment dollars are used in a manner that creates a
 clear and direct link between the marketing service provided
 and the benefit to the assessed lodging business.

Tuesday f. No- March 18,other
 business  2025 than
 - PAGE
 the assessed lodging business 20
 will
 d. The marketing of the BID is a specific benefit for the lodging
 businesses with 50 rooms or more and exceeds the level of
 services provided by the City.


 e. The assessment dollars are used in a manner that creates a
 clear and direct link between the marketing service provided
 and the benefit to the assessed lodging business.


 f. No business other than the assessed lodging business will
 benefit from the assessment funded attendant marketing
 services and programs.


 g. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost to the local government of conferring the benefit.


 h. In accordance with State Law and based on the facts and
 conclusions contained in the Management District Plan,
 attached to said Council file, the assessment levied on each
 lodging business shall not be used to provide improvements
 or activities outside the BID or for any other purpose other than
 those described in the Management District Plan and does
 not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional specific
 benefit conferred on that lodging business.


 i. All lodging businesses with 50 rooms or more that will have a
 specific benefit conferred upon them by the improvements and
 activities provided and upon which an assessment would be
 imposed are those as identified in the Management District
 Plan and Engineer’s Report.


 j. In accordance with State Law, the benefits and services
 provided by the BID to lodging businesses with 50 rooms or
 more within established business improvement districts in the
 City of Los Angeles are separate and distinct from the
 benefits provided by other business improvement districts.


 k. The City Clerk, or designee, will collect the assessments.


 l. The City Clerk, or designee, shall be allowed to review or audit
 the financial records of the owners’ association and all lodging
 businesses as necessary to ensure accurate collection and
 expenditure of the assessments.


 m. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day to day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 21
 4. ADOPT the Preliminary Report of the City Clerk, attached to
 l. The City Clerk, or designee, shall be allowed to review or audit
 the financial records of the owners’ association and all lodging
 businesses as necessary to ensure accurate collection and
 expenditure of the assessments.


 m. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day to day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 4. ADOPT the Preliminary Report of the City Clerk, attached to
 said Council file.


 5. ADOPT the Management District Plan dated February 12, 2025,
 attached to said Council file.


 6. ADOPT the Engineer’s Report dated February 12, 2025, attached
 to said Council file.


 7. PRESENT and ADOPT the revised ORDINANCE OF INTENTION
 dated February 27, 2025, attached to the Council file, to establish a
 BID to be known as the "Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District”
 pursuant to the Provisions of the Property and Business
 Improvement District Law of 1994 (Division 18, Part 7, Streets and
 Highways Code, State of California), and to levy assessments.


 8. DIRECT the City Clerk to comply with the notice, protest, and
 hearing procedures prescribed in the California Government Code,
 Section 54954.6.


 9. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to release a Request For Proposals for
 auditing services; enter into a contract with the selected vendors and
 execute individual Task Orders as needed for auditing purposes of
 the hotels and other business improvement districts in an aggregate
 amount not to exceed $172,000 for a three­year period.


 10. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City Clerk, to
 prepare an enabling Ordinance establishing the Los Angeles
 Tourism Marketing District for City Council consideration at the
 conclusion of the required public hearing.


 11. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, upon establishment of the District, to
 prepare, execute and administer a contract between the City of Los
 Angeles and the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District
 Corporation for the administration of the District’s programs.



Tuesday Fiscal Impact -Statement:
 March 18, The
 2025City
 - Clerk reports that there are no City­
 PAGE 22
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 Tourism Marketing District for City Council consideration at the
 conclusion of the required public hearing.


 11. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, upon establishment of the District, to
 prepare, execute and administer a contract between the City of Los
 Angeles and the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District
 Corporation for the administration of the District’s programs.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there are no City­
 owned lodging businesses within the boundaries of the proposed District
 to be assessed and therefore no impact on the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report; Ordinance held over
 to March 25, 2025 for second consideration
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

 Adopted to Reconsider Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report and Ordinance
 Forthwith
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(26) 21­1155
 CD 14 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
 reconfirmation of the Little Tokyo, Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that:

 a. The assessments imposed by the Little Tokyo BID for the
 2025 FY provide services that directly benefit each of the
 businesses which pay the assessments.


 b. The services funded by the assessment are provided only to
 each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries of the
 BID.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 23
 1. FIND that:

 a. The assessments imposed by the Little Tokyo BID for the
 2025 FY provide services that directly benefit each of the
 businesses which pay the assessments.


 b. The services funded by the assessment are provided only to
 each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries of the
 BID.


 c. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost of conferring the benefits.


 d. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day­to­day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 e. The assessments for the proposed business­based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e)(1).


 f. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association, the
 Little Tokyo Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated December 5, 2024, confirming the Little Tokyo
 BID Annual Report, levying an annual assessment for the Little Tokyo
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­second operating year,
 January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail the
 public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of Section
 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling Ordinance levying the
 special assessment for the Little Tokyo BID’s twenty­third operating
 period beginning January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


Tuesday 5. APPROVE- March  18, 2025
 the Little Tokyo- Business Association. to administer
 PAGE  24
 the
 proposed services of the Little Tokyo BID pursuant to Section 36500
 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail the
 public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of Section
 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling Ordinance levying the
 special assessment for the Little Tokyo BID’s twenty­third operating
 period beginning January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 5. APPROVE the Little Tokyo Business Association. to administer the
 proposed services of the Little Tokyo BID pursuant to Section 36500
 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and City
 regulations.


 6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to
 prepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City and
 the Little Tokyo Business Association to administer the Little Tokyo
 BID, if the Ordinance reconfirming the BID is adopted.


 7. APPOINT the Advisory Board as detailed in the Little Tokyo BID
 2025 Annual Report, included as an Attachment of the City Clerk
 report dated November 27, 2024, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact on
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report; Ordinance held over
 to March 25, 2025 for second consideration
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

 Adopted to Reconsider Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report and Ordinance
 Forthwith
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(27) 13­0765­S1
 CD 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
Tuesday reconfirmation -ofMarch
 the Chatsworth,
 18, 2025 - Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 PAGE 25
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.
 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report and Ordinance
 Forthwith
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(27) 13­0765­S1
 CD 12 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and
 ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the
 reconfirmation of the Chatsworth, Merchant­Based, Business Improvement
 District (BID) and Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 Annual Planning Report.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that:

 a. The assessments imposed by the Chatsworth BID for the
 2025 FY provide services that directly benefit each of the
 businesses which pay the assessments.


 b. The services funded by the assessment are provided only to
 each of the assessed businesses within the boundaries of the
 BID.


 c. The assessment imposed does not exceed the reasonable
 cost of conferring the benefits.


 d. The proposed improvements and activities are completely
 separate from the day­to­day operations of the City of Los
 Angeles.


 e. The assessments for the proposed business­based District
 are not taxes and that the BID qualifies for exemption from
 Proposition 26 under exemption 1 of Article XIII C, Section
 1(e)(1).


 f. The services to be provided by the Owners' Association, the
 Chatsworth Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated January 28, 2025, confirming the Chatsworth BID
Tuesday - March levying
 Annual Report, 18, 2025an- annual assessment for the Chatsworth
 PAGE 26
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­third operating year, January
 Chatsworth Business Association, are in the nature of
 professional, expert, technical or other special services, that
 the services are of a temporary and occasional character, and
 that the use of competitive bidding would be impractical, not
 advantageous, undesirable or where the common law
 otherwise excuses compliance with competitive bidding
 requirements.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF
 INTENTION, dated January 28, 2025, confirming the Chatsworth BID
 Annual Report, levying an annual assessment for the Chatsworth
 Business Improvement District’s twenty­third operating year, January
 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 3. DIRECT the City Clerk to schedule, prepare, publish, and mail the
 public hearing notice, as required by the provisions of Section
 36500 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code.


 4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk, subject to approval by the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, to prepare an enabling Ordinance levying the
 special assessment for the Chatsworth BID’s twenty­third operating
 period beginning January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025.


 5. APPROVE the Chatsworth B.I.D., Inc. to administer the proposed
 services of the Chatsworth BID pursuant to Section 36500 et seq. of
 the California Streets and Highways Code and City regulations.


 6. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to City Attorney approval, to
 prepare, execute, and administer a contract between the City and
 the Chatsworth B.I.D., Inc. to administer the Chatsworth BID, if the
 Ordinance reconfirming the BID is adopted.


 7. APPOINT the Advisory Board as detailed in the Chatsworth
 BID 2025 Annual Report, included as an Attachment of the City
 Clerk report dated January 21, 2025, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact on
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report; Ordinance held over
 to March 25, 2025 for second consideration
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

Tuesday Adopted to Reconsider Item - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 27
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report; Ordinance held over
 to March 25, 2025 for second consideration
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Park, Price Jr.,
 Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Lee, Padilla,
 Rodriguez (4)

 Adopted to Reconsider Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

 Adopted Economic Development and Jobs Committee Report and Ordinance
 Forthwith
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)

(28) 14­1635­S10
 HOUSING AND HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the
 Home­sharing vendor evaluation, process enhancements, compliance
 strategies, and staffing needs for home­sharing and residential hotels
 enforcement; and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. NOTE and FILE the Department of City Planning (DCP) reports
 dated October 4, 2023, March 13, 2024, and November 1, 2024,
 attached the Council file, relative to the home­sharing vendor
 evaluation, process enhancements, compliance strategies, and
 staffing needs for home­sharing and residential hotels enforcement;
 and related matters.


 2. NOTE and FILE the City Attorney report dated November 26, 2024,
 attached to the Council file, relative to the Home Sharing Ordinance
 enforcement.


 3. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD)
 report dated November 27, 2024, attached to the Council file,
 relative to additional recommendations regarding staffing needs for
 effective home­sharing enforcement.


 4. REQUEST the City Attorney, in consultation with the DCP and other
 relevant departments, to report to Council on the selection,
 appointment, retention and hiring of qualified hearing officers to
 conduct Administrative Citation Enforcement Program (ACE)
 related hearings in order to strengthen and create efficiency in the
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 28
 current program.
 3. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD)
 report dated November 27, 2024, attached to the Council file,
 relative to additional recommendations regarding staffing needs for
 effective home­sharing enforcement.


 4. REQUEST the City Attorney, in consultation with the DCP and other
 relevant departments, to report to Council on the selection,
 appointment, retention and hiring of qualified hearing officers to
 conduct Administrative Citation Enforcement Program (ACE)
 related hearings in order to strengthen and create efficiency in the
 current program.


 5. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and
 other relevant departments, to prepare and present an amendment
 to the Ordinance to require that the LAHD and Los Angeles
 Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) conduct property
 inspections prior to permit issuance.


 6. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and
 other relevant departments, to prepare and present an amendment
 to the Ordinance to require that platforms conduct an electronic
 verification of listings prior to booking transactions, similar to New
 York City’s program.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to report back on the feasibility of identifying
 and monitoring, on no less than a yearly basis, the City’s Mixed Use
 Residential Hotel stock, that include both tourist units (which are
 short­term) and residential units (which are long­term), with
 recommendations for stricter enforcement approaches for this
 protected housing stock.


 8. R E S O L V E t h a t t h e L A H D , L A D B S , a n d o t h e r e n f o r c i n g
 departments, in consultation with the City Attorney, should use the
 administrative fine amounts specified by Chapter 1, Article 1.2,
 Section 11.2.04(a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) for
 violations of the Home Sharing Ordinance where applicable.


 9. INSTRUCT the CAO and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), in
 consultation with the DCP, LADBS, LAHD, City Attorney, and any
 other relevant departments, to report to Council for additional
 staffing and resources required across departments for any
 amendments to the Home­Sharing Ordinance to support
 enforcement.


 10. INSTRUCT the CAO and the CLA, in consultation with the DCP,
 LADBS, LAHD, City Attorney, and any other relevant departments,
 to report to Council on options for creating a single office, division,
 or department related to Home­Sharing administration and
 enforcement, Party House enforcement, and enforcement of other
Tuesday related - March 18, 2025 -
 commercial activities on residential properties,PAGE which 29
 includes a recommended organizational structure, staffing plan, and
 other relevant departments, to report to Council for additional
 staffing and resources required across departments for any
 amendments to the Home­Sharing Ordinance to support
 enforcement.


 10. INSTRUCT the CAO and the CLA, in consultation with the DCP,
 LADBS, LAHD, City Attorney, and any other relevant departments,
 to report to Council on options for creating a single office, division,
 or department related to Home­Sharing administration and
 enforcement, Party House enforcement, and enforcement of other
 related commercial activities on residential properties, which
 includes a recommended organizational structure, staffing plan, and
 funding, including the impacts of existing vacant positions, and
 funding needed to effectively resource the program. This should
 include a consideration of moving complaint investigation and
 citation defense from the DCP to other departments.


 11. INSTRUCT the DCP, in consultation with the City Attorney and the
 CAO, to prepare and present a fee study updating the LAMC 19.01
 T. Home­Sharing Registration and Renewal Fees and LAMC
 Section 12.22.A.32(e)(5) Home­Sharing per­night fee to reflect full
 cost recovery.


 12. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft a Private Right of Action clause
 for the City's Home­Sharing Ordinance that would allow any
 interested party to pursue Private Right of Action to enforce the law
 when unlawful activities occur, potentially modeled after the False
 Claims Act to allow a person to bring an action on behalf of the City,
 give the City an opportunity to intervene to ensure its interests are
 adequately represented; and allow the person bringing the action to
 share a portion of the damages, fines or penalties imposed.


 13. INSTRUCT the Office of Finance to report to Council on potential tax
 revenue loss if the City disallowed Extended Home­Sharing
 registrations.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that the report is provided for
 informational purposes, and as such, there is no impact to the General
 Fund. However, additional funding would be required to support the
 necessary resources identified in this report, and given that there are
 limited enforcement resources currently available in the Home­Sharing
 Rental Enforcement Trust Fund (Ordinance No. 186197; Council file No.
 14­1635­S7), a new fee study analyzing both the registration and Per
 Night Fee would be required.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes

 For if Amended:
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 NC Westchester/Playa
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 30
 limited enforcement resources currently available in the Home­Sharing
 Rental Enforcement Trust Fund (Ordinance No. 186197; Council file No.
 14­1635­S7), a new fee study analyzing both the registration and Per
 Night Fee would be required.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes

 For if Amended:
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 NC Westchester/Playa

 For:
 Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council
 Empowerment Congress West Area Neighborhood Council
 Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council




 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter.)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
(29) 20­1572­S1
 CD 3 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018­4978, located at 7329 and 7331 North Kelvin
 Avenue, northerly of Sherman Way.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018­4978, located at
 7329 and 7331 North Kelvin Avenue, northerly of Sherman Way and
 accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with
 security documents.

 (Bond No. C­147008)
 Owner: Muhammad Faisal; Surveyor: Karen Korganyan

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map
 pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No
 additional City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 31
 (Bond No. C­147008)
 Owner: Muhammad Faisal; Surveyor: Karen Korganyan

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map
 pursuant to Section 19.02(B)(3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No
 additional City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(30) 18­0611­S4
 CD 2 COMMUNICATION FROM PROPOSITION K – L.A. FOR KIDS STEERING
 COMMITTEE and RESOLUTION relative to authorizing a grant application
 under Measure A Acquisition­Only Competitive Grant Program for the
 acquisition of Strathern Park West.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) to
 submit a grant application as detailed in the project list
 (Attachment), attached to the Proposition K – L.A. For Kids Steering
 Committee report dated March 4, 2025 (Steering Committee
 report), attached to the Council file, to the County of Los Angeles
 Regional Park and Open Space District (RPOSD) under the
 Measure A 2024 Competitive Acquisition Only Program for the
 acquisition of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
 owned land at Strathern Park West (Project).


 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, RAP, to accept the RPOSD
 grant funds for the Project and execute the grant agreement
 attached to said Steering Committee report, attached to the Council
 file, with substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in
 the Attachment, for the grant amount, scope, and the
 grant performance period for the Project, subject to the approval of
 the Mayor and City Council pursuant to Section 14.6(c) of the Los
 Angeles Administrative Code and approval as to the form of the
 grant agreement by the City Attorney.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION included as Attachment 3
 of said Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.


 4. SUBMIT RAP’s grant request to the Arts, Parks, Libraries, and
Tuesday Community- March 18, 2025Committee
 Enrichment - in accordance with City PAGE 32
 Council
 instructions (Council file No. 18­0611), and to the Mayor and City
 grant performance period for the Project, subject to the approval of
 the Mayor and City Council pursuant to Section 14.6(c) of the Los
 Angeles Administrative Code and approval as to the form of the
 grant agreement by the City Attorney.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION included as Attachment 3
 of said Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.


 4. SUBMIT RAP’s grant request to the Arts, Parks, Libraries, and
 Community Enrichment Committee in accordance with City Council
 instructions (Council file No. 18­0611), and to the Mayor and City
 Council for approval pursuant to Section 14.6(c) of the Los
 Angeles Administrative Code.


 5. AUTHORIZE the RAP to make necessary technical adjustments to
 the Grant application as necessary to carry out the intent of said
 Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Proposition K – L.A. for Kids Steering
 Committee reports that there is no anticipated General Fund impact.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Arts, Parks, Libraries, and Community Enrichment Committee
 waived consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian,
 Padilla, Park, Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (13); Nays: (0); Absent:
 Lee, Rodriguez (2)

(31) 25­0242
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS
 (BOARD) relative to a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000 to help
 fund the Los Angeles Women Police Officers and Associates (LAWPOA)
 29th Annual Symposium 2025.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 ACCEPT a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000, from the Los
 Angeles Police Foundation, to help fund the LAWPOA 29th Annual
 Symposium 2025; and THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.


Tuesday Community - March 18,
 Impact 2025 -
 Statement: None submitted PAGE 33
 ACCEPT a non­monetary donation valued at $45,000, from the Los
 Angeles Police Foundation, to help fund the LAWPOA 29th Annual
 Symposium 2025; and THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Public Safety Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: Hernandez (1); Absent: Lee,
 Rodriguez (2)



Items Called Special
Motions for Posting and Referral- SEE ATTACHED
Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings
Closed Session
(32) 24­1393


 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Adam Hollands v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. BC684154. (This matter arises from alleged
 disability discrimination and failure to accommodate and engage in the
 interactive process that occurred between 2007 to 2017 within the Los
 Angeles Police Department, and retaliation for reporting the allegations to
 management.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky – Blumenfield) in Open Session - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)


(33) 24­0903
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Stephanie Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02640. (This matter arises from
Tuesday - Marcha18,
 an incident involving 2025 -of the Los Angeles Fire Department
 member PAGE 34
 that
 occurred on May 22, 2021.)
 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky – Blumenfield) in Open Session - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)


(33) 24­0903
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Stephanie Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02640. (This matter arises from
 an incident involving a member of the Los Angeles Fire Department that
 occurred on May 22, 2021.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter in Closed
 Session on March 4, 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky – Blumenfield) in Open Session - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)


(34) 24­1508
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Margarito T. Lopez, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,
 United States District Court Case No. 2:22­cv­07534­FLA­MAAx. (This
 matter arises from an officer­involved shooting which occurred on
 December 18, 2021, in the Los Angeles Police Department Newton
 Division of the City of Los Angeles.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky – Blumenfield) in Open Session - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)


(35) 25­0133
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Andrea R. Naaktgeboren v. City of Los Angeles, et al.,
 Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV20386. (This matter arises
 from a vehicle versus vehicle collision that occurred on January 24, 2023,
 at the intersection of 1st Street and South Beaudry Avenue, in Los
 Angeles, California.)

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky – Blumenfield) in Open Session - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris­Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
Tuesday Price Jr., Raman, Soto­Mart​ínez,
 - March 18, 2025(12);
 Yaroslavsky - Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 PAGE 35
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)
 Council Clerk PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL




Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 37
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky- Blumenfield) in OpenSession -SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman,Soto-Martinez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)


(36) 25-0131
 The City Council shall recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section No. 54956.9(d)(1 ), to confer with its legal counsel relative to
 the case entitled Dartanyan Wallace v, City of Los Angeles. et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 23STCV10324. (This matter arises from
 a June 2, 2022, automobile accident near the intersection of Cassil Place
 and Sunset Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.

 (Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter on March 4,
 2025.)

 Adopted Motion (Yaroslavsky- Blumenfield) in OpenSession -SEE ATTACHED
 Ay_es: Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park,
 Price Jr., Raman,Soto-Martinez, Yaroslavsky (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield,
 Lee, Rodriguez (3)




Adjourning Motions -SEE ATTACHED
Council Adjournment

ENDING ROLL CALL
Blumenfield, Harris-Dawson, Hernandez, Hutt, Jurado, McOsker, Nazarian, Padilla, Park, Price Jr.,
Raman, Soto-Martinez, Yaroslavsky (13); Absent: Lee, Rodriguez (2)

Whereupon the Council did adjourn.
ATTEST: Petty F. Santos, INTERIM CITY CLERK
By




Tuesday - March 18, 2025 - PAGE 36
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Park for Lee Hutt Giovanni Roberto
Soto-Martinez Raman Maria Victoria Vasquez
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
McOkser All Councilmembers Dennis Dale Lane
Hutt All Councilmembers Dr. Shawna Petit Dinkins
 ITEM NO. 32
 3/18/25 Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
 Closed Session
 MOTION

I HEREBY MOVE that the Council ADOPT the following recommendations in order to effect
settlement in the case entitled Adam Hollands v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior
Court Case No. BC684154. (This matter arises from alleged disability discrimination and failure
to accommodate and engage in the interactive process that occurred between 2007 to 2017 within
the Los Angeles Police Department, and retaliation for reporting the allegations to management.),
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office and the Los Angeles Police Department to
 expend up to $675,000 in settlement of the above-entitled matter.

 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $610,000 from the Liability Claims Fund No.
 100/59, Account No. 009798, Miscellaneous Liability Payouts, to Fund No. 100/59,
 Account No. 009792, Police Liability Payouts.

 3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from Fund No. 100/59, Account No.
 009792, Police Liability Payouts, as follows: McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP Client Trust
 Account in the amount of $610,000.

 4. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department to draw a demand from Fund No.
 100/70, Account No. 001012 – Sworn Salaries payable to Adam Hollands for back
 wages in the amount of $65,000, subject to all applicable taxes, deductions and payroll
 withholdings.

 5. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary technical adjustments,
 subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to implement the instructions.

This matter was recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee (Yaroslavsky
– Blumenfield – Hutt – Hernandez: “Yes; McOsker “Absent”) at its meeting held on March 4, 2025,
in Closed Session as permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).




 PRESENTED BY_________________________________
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY
 Councilmember, 5th District




 SECONDED BY _________________________________
 BOB BLUMENFIELD
 Councilmember, 3rd District
MM 3-4-25
CF 24-1393
 ITEM NO. 33
 3/18/25 Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
 Closed Session
 MOTION

I HEREBY MOVE that the Council ADOPT the following recommendations in order to effect
settlement in the case entitled Stephanie Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
Superior Court Case No. 23STCV02640. (This matter arises from an incident involving a member
of the Los Angeles Fire Department that occurred on May 22, 2021.), SUBJECT TO THE
APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office to expend up to $250,000 in settlement of the
 above-entitled matter.

 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $250,000 from the Liability Claims Fund No.
 100/59, Account No. 009798, Miscellaneous Liability Payouts, to Fund No. 100/59,
 Account No. 009790, Fire Liability Payouts.

 3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from Fund No. 100/59, Account No.
 009790, Fire Liability Payouts, as follows: Curd Galindo & Smith, LLP and Stephanie
 Hernandez in the amount of $250,000.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary technical adjustments,
 subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to implement the instructions.


This matter was recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee (Yaroslavsky
– Blumenfield – Hutt – Hernandez: “Yes; McOsker “Absent”) at its meeting held on March 4, 2025,
in Closed Session as permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).


 PRESENTED BY_________________________________
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY
 Councilmember, 5th District




 SECONDED BY _________________________________
 BOB BLUMENFIELD
 Councilmember, 3rd District
MM 3-4-25
CF 24-0903
 ITEM NO. 34
 3/18/25 Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
 Closed Session
 MOTION

I HEREBY MOVE that the Council ADOPT the following recommendations in order to effect
settlement in the case entitled Margarito T. Lopez, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United
States District Court Case No. 2:22-cv-07534-FLA-MAAx. (This matter arises from an officer-
involved shooting which occurred on December 18, 2021, in the Los Angeles Police Department
Newton Division of the City of Los Angeles.), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office to expend up to $8,000,000 in settlement of the
 above-entitled matter.

 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to transfer $8,000,000 from the Liability Claims Fund No.
 100/59, Account No. 009798, Miscellaneous Liability Payouts, to Fund No. 100/59,
 Account No. 009792, Police Liability Payouts.

 3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from Fund No. 100/59, Account No.
 009792, Police Liability Payouts, as follows: Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo, Client Trust
 Account in the amount of $8,000,000.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary technical adjustments,
 subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to implement the instructions.

This matter was recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee (Yaroslavsky
– Blumenfield – Hutt – Hernandez: “Yes; McOsker “Absent”) at its meeting held on March 4, 2025,
in Closed Session as permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).


 PRESENTED BY_________________________________
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY
 Councilmember, 5th District




 SECONDED BY _________________________________
 BOB BLUMENFIELD
 Councilmember, 3rd District
MM 3-4-25
CF 24-1508
 ITEM NO. 35
 3/18/25 Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
 Closed Session
 MOTION

I HEREBY MOVE that the Council ADOPT the following recommendations in order to effect
settlement in the case entitled Andrea R. Naaktgeboren v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
Superior Court Case No. 23STCV20386. (This matter arises from a vehicle versus vehicle
collision that occurred on January 24, 2023, at the intersection of 1st Street and South Beaudry
Avenue, in Los Angeles, California.), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office to expend up to $95,000 in settlement of the
 above-entitled matter.

 2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from the Liability Claims Fund No.
 100/59, Account No. 009798, Miscellaneous Liability Payouts as follows: Eric V. Traut,
 APLC and Andrea R. Naaktgeboren in the amount of $95,000.

 3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary technical adjustments,
 subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to implement the instructions.

This matter was recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee (Yaroslavsky
– Blumenfield – Hutt – Hernandez: “Yes; McOsker “Absent”) at its meeting held on March 4, 2025,
in Closed Session as permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).


 PRESENTED BY_________________________________
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY
 Councilmember, 5th District




 SECONDED BY _________________________________
 BOB BLUMENFIELD
 Councilmember, 3rd District
MM 3-4-25
CF 25-0133
 ITEM NO. 36
 3/18/25 Council – Regular Meeting Agenda
 Closed Session
 MOTION

I HEREBY MOVE that the Council ADOPT the following recommendations in order to effect
settlement in the case entitled Dartanyan Wallace v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
Superior Court Case No. 23STCV10324. (This matter arises from a June 2, 2022, automobile
accident near the intersection of Cassil Place and Sunset Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.),
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney’s Office to expend up to $100,000 in settlement of the
 above-entitled matter.

 2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to draw a demand from the Liability Claims Fund No.
 100/59, Account No. 009798, Miscellaneous Liability Payouts, as follows: Homa
 Molayem Law Corporation and Dartanyan Wallace in the amount of $100,000.

 3. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to make necessary technical adjustments,
 subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to implement the instructions.

This matter was recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee (Yaroslavsky
– Blumenfield – Hutt – Hernandez: “Yes; McOsker “Absent”) at its meeting held on March 4, 2025,
in Closed Session as permitted by Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).


 PRESENTED BY_________________________________
 KATY YAROSLAVSKY
 Councilmember, 5th District




 SECONDED BY _________________________________
 BOB BLUMENFIELD
 Councilmember, 3rd District
MM 3-4-25
CF 25-0131