Historical Commission — Springfield, MA
Date: 2026-04-02
Time: 17:30

SPRINGFIELD HISTORICAL COMMISSION
 THURSDAY, APRIL 2, 2026 | HEARING OVERVIEWS


 CONTINUED HEARINGS
E S PINE STREET (09715-0135) (APPROPRIATENESS & HARDSHIP)
  • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: Maple Hill
  • APPLICATION SUBMISSION DATE: Friday, February 27, 2026
  • APPLICATION EXPIRATION DATE: Tuesday, April 28, 2026
  • APPLICATION OVERVIEW: The Petitioner has submitted an Application for Certificate of
 Appropriateness & Hardship for the purpose of constructing a Two-Family Dwelling. The
 Petitioner is specifically proposing the following:
 o Lansing Building Products Classic double hung, double pane, one-over-one black
 vinyl windows;
 o Four panel, five lite external grids framesaver Masonite fiberglass door;
 o Cedar Knolls D-4 (“clapboard”) vinyl siding with 3-inch window and door casings
 and a 5.5-inch corner boards;
 o The Petitioner has proposed vinyl shakes at the front-facing eave (towards Pine
 Street);
 o GAF Timberline HDZ Architectural Asphalt Shingles, charcoal in color;
 o While the front porch does not span the width of the building, it appears to be wider
 than other standard entrances and contains railings that do not exceed the bottom
 of the adjacent window sill.
 o Heat pumps are to be installed on the south side of the building with the compressor
 units to be affixed to the wall. The compressor units will be shielded by a fence at
 the front plane of the building.
  • APPROVED WINDOW STATUS: Staff was unable to ascertain the model of the window since it
 was not included on the application, and was therefore, unable to confirm that the proposed
 windows were on the list of windows previously approved. Staff searched for both
 “Lansing” and “Classic,” which did not yield any results.
  • STAFF COMMENTS: The Petitioner has made reference to some other new construction
 projects in the area, specifically the new duplexes at 207 Pine Street, 213-215 Pine Street,
 217-219 Pine Street, 271 Pine Street, and 251-257 Central Street. Staff assumes that the
 hardship request is for the vinyl siding; however, the Commission should confirm with the
 Petitioner. Staff did communicate to the Petitioner that the duplexes at 213-215 and 217-
 219 Pine Streets were anomalies; that Staff has not witnessed the Commission allow any
 recent new builds with vinyl siding. Staff specifically noted to the Petitioner that Hardie
 Board siding was a common siding that the Commission has been recently approving.
  • LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION: n/a
  • SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENT: None



 1|Page
Staff has had the opportunity to review the Commission’s archived meetings relating to the
referenced new construction projects at the following addresses: 207 Pine Street, 213-215 Pine
Street, 217-219 Pine Street, 271 Pine Street, and 251-257 Central Street. The applications
pertaining to 213-215 Pine Street and 217-219 Pine Street were reviewed as one application.
Similarly, the applications pertaining to 271 Pine Street and 251-257 Central Street were reviewed
as one application.
Regarding 271 Pine Street and 251-257 Central Street, Staff found no substantive discussion
relating to vinyl siding. The original proposal was submitted to the Commission on August 19, 2021
(timestamp: 1:00:55). During that hearing, the Petitioner advised that vinyl siding was being used
in an effort to build something that looks historic, but is affordable (timestamp: 1:05:20). While
public comment was submitted by the Springfield Preservation Trust (timestamp: 1:06:15), they
vocalized no opposition to vinyl siding. No in-depth conversation was had about the vinyl siding.
Due to COVID protocol regarding new hearings and virtual meetings, the Commission collected a lot
of the testimony and evidence on August 19, 2021 and then continued the hearing to the September
2, 2021 (timestamp: 32:05) meeting. The application ending up being approved with no other
substantive discussion about vinyl siding.
Subsequently, the Petitioner submitted several applications regarding amendments to the
proposed building at 271 Pine Street. The January 6, 2022 (recording unavailable, but commences
at timestamp: 25:15) and January 20, 2022 (timestamp: 7:45) hearings focused on an amendment
to remove the proposed garage and modify the rear deck staircase due to adding a walk-out
basement. This matter was approved with no discussions made about the vinyl siding. On March
16, 2023 (recording unavailable, but commences at 1:00:00), the Petitioner applied for the purpose
of making several modifications, one of which included the addition of vinyl medallions to be
installed beneath the already approved scalloped vinyl siding. The subject matter did not contain a
proposal to deviate from the approved plan of installing vinyl siding.
Finally, after the September 7, 2023 meeting was cancelled, the Petitioner was back in front of the
Commission on September 21, 2023 (timestamp: 1:46:45) to discuss unauthorized changes with
the Commission. The unauthorized changes with the Commission did not include any matter
relating to the already approved vinyl siding.
One year later, Staff believes the start of the domino-effect commenced. The properties referenced
– 207 Pine Street, 213-215 Pine Street, and 217-219 Pine Street – seemingly compound on one
another, as each subsequent application references the previous application. The 207 Pine Street
project was reviewed on April 21, 2022 (recording unavailable, but commences at timestamp:
1:46:30). During that hearing, the Petitioner articulated a hardship relating to the already-standing
and significantly deteriorated building at 207 Pine Street. Due to the immense deteriorated
condition of the building, the Petitioner informed the Commission that he was expending between
$280,000 to $300,000 to renovate the building, which would include the rebuild of the exterior
walls; not just the replacement of the existing and deteriorated wooden clapboards. During that
hearing, public comment from Jennifer Rao opined that while there was not much historic value to
salvage given the condition of the building, she was concerned about the precedent being set
around vinyl siding. The Commission ultimately approved the proposed renovation project,
including the vinyl siding, as a Certificate of Hardship. While subsequent agendas from May 19,
2022 and June 2, 2022 had 207 Pine Street on the agenda (recordings on Focus Springfield also
unavailable), no further substantive discussion occurred. During the May 19, 2022 hearing, the
matter was continued to June 2, 2022 where the item was not even discussed.
The last two referenced properties, 213-215 and 217-219 Pine Street, were allowed to proceed
with vinyl siding as a Certificate of Hardship. The proposed project was originally in front of the


 2|Page
Commission on May 16, 2024 (timestamp: 42:40). Admittedly, Staff did not watch this particular
hearing knowing that the application was continued to a later date – scheduled for June 6, 2024
(timestamp: 8:20). At the continued public hearing (the June 6, 2024 hearing), there were various
times the Commission discussed vinyl siding with the Petitioners (timestamps: 16:00, 23:30, and
32:00). Unfortunately, the audio for the beginning half of the continued hearing was garbled;
(timestamp 16:00); however, the latter of half of the hearing was able to provide needed context.
The Commission did advise that one of the reasons the application was being denied at that hearing
was because of the proposed vinyl siding (timestamp: 32:00). Though, the Petitioners seemingly
contended throughout the hearing that these two new builds necessitated the use of vinyl siding in
order for the project to come to fruition. Without vinyl siding, they would have a budgetary hurdle
that will inhibit moving forward with the new buildings. The Commissioner denied the application.
Ultimately, the Petitioners reapplied and a hearing was held on July 18, 2024 (timestamp 33:55).
The Commission reviewed the newly submitted application – this time as a Certificate of Hardship.
Staff believes that the overall project being submitted as a Certificate of Hardship is misleading, as
the Certificate of Hardship was really only for the vinyl siding only, as all of the other aspects of the
construction project, which were presented in the previous application on May 16, 2024 and June 6,
2024, were incorporated and approved by reference. The application probably should have been
split into two with the Certificate of Hardship only covering the vinyl siding.
At the July 18, 2024 hearing, the Petitioners presented three cost estimates in an effort to
demonstrate that a financial hardship existed: vinyl siding - $15,540; LP Smartside siding –
$31,780; and Hardie board siding – $34,300. The Petitioners advised the Commission that they
inquired with the landowner at 207 Pine Street as to what siding they used in their renovation
project (timestamp: 40:00). After additional discussion, the Petitioners informed the Commission
that they were doing as much as possible to make the building look historic within the bounds of
their budget (timestamp: 61:00).
As provided above, Staff cautions the Commission about the domino effect that is beginning to
occur with the approval of vinyl siding relating to new construction projects, especially within the
Pine Street area. Presenting the vinyl siding approval at 207 Pine Street is somewhat out-of-context
– to salvage the existing historic building as a whole, the exterior walls had to be rebuilt, which is an
extraordinary cost. Furthermore, the 207 Pine Street project is particularly distinguishable from
new construction projects since the building was a pre-existing building. Staff unfortunately cannot
speak to why vinyl siding at 271 Pine Street and 251-257 Central Street was approved with
minimal conversation other than surmising that COVID protocol may have been a contributing
factor, as reviewing in-depth projects remotely over Zoom proved to be an obstacle. The other
referenced properties at 213-215 Pine Street and 217-219 Pine Street seem to be the only verified
anomaly in that budgetary constraints seemingly played a role in approving a Certificate of
Hardship for the vinyl siding.
As mentioned to the Commission in the Hearing Overview Packet, the Commission has approved a
number of new builds, specifically six (6), over the course of the last year:
 • ES Ingersoll Grove (06925-0025) - Duplex
 • 34 Kopernik Street – Duplexes
 • NS Bay Street (01085-0033) – Duplex
 • WS Buckingham Street (02042-0039) – Single-Family Dwelling
 • WS Pine Street (09715-0062) – Duplex
 • WS Bowdoin Street (01680-0015) – Single-Family Dwelling
Staff mistakenly advised that all of the Commission’s recently approved new construction projects
over the last year (the aforementioned projects) required non-vinyl siding. In fact, the Commission

 3|Page
allowed one of the projects to proceed with vinyl siding – the WS Pine Street duplex (the other
properties were approved as having Hardie Board). The WS Pine Street (09715-0062) project was
heard by the Commission on three separate occasions: August 7, 2025 (timestamp: 37:20); August
21, 2025 (timestamp: 36:30); and September 18, 2025 (timestamp: 2:00). The Commission did not
appear to have an in-depth substantive conversation about the use of vinyl siding.
Nevertheless, the Commission should consider whether aspects of new construction projects
should qualify as a hardship. Potential developers are theoretically and knowingly purchasing
and/or developing vacant properties within a historic district – presumedly with the understanding
that there are restrictions relating to materials in order to ensure historic accuracy – not just for
aesthetic purposes, but also with materials. The Commission should weigh the use of vinyl siding,
especially in light of their supermajority of approvals over the last year requiring Hardie Board
with the construction of new dwelling units.


 NEW HEARINGS
167 MAPLE STREET (APPROPRIATENESS)
 • LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: Ridgewood
 • APPLICATION SUBMISSION DATE: Friday, March 6, 2026
 • APPLICATION EXPIRATION DATE: Tuesday, May 5, 2026
 • APPLICATION OVERVIEW: The Petitioner has submitted an Application for Certificate of
 Appropriateness for the purpose of obtaining approval for the unauthorized replacement of
 the right second-floor window, as viewed from Maple Street, which is a white vinyl window.
 The replacement window is a used unspecified window and is unsure as to the make and
 model. In addition, other second floor windows were replaced sometime in the last year
 with white vinyl windows without authorization from the Commission (flagged by the
 Building Department); however, the Petitioner is contending that that those windows were
 installed prior to the purchasing of the building.
 • APPROVED WINDOW STATUS: Unknown since the Petitioner is unaware of the make and
 model of the window.
 • STAFF COMMENTS:
 o When reviewing archived Google Street View images, the previous windows appear
 to have been of a darker color, not white.
 • LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION: n/a
 • SUBMITTED WRITTEN COMMENT: n/a


 OTHER MATTERS BEFORE THE COMMISSION
NONE


 ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATES

 4|Page
• QUESTIONS TO THE COMMISSION
 o Has the Commission taken part in ethics training in the past?
• RECENTLY APPROVED CERTIFICATES OF NON-APPLICABILITY
 o 195 SUMNER AVENUE  Second-Floor Patio Door
 o 35 MATTOON STREET  Rear Exhaust Vent with 8-inch Hood
 o 14 GREENLEAF STREET  Asphalt Roof to Asphalt Roof
• LETTERS OF SUPPORT ISSUED
 o 471 PLAINFIELD STREET (Brightwood School)
 o 113 STATE STREET, 1139-1155 MAIN STREET, 1163 MAIN STREET, 11-21 STOCKBRIDGE
 STREET (Colonial & Clocktower Blocks)
• NEW VIOLATIONS ISSUED
 o NONE
• VIOLATION RESOLUTION IN PROGRESS
 o 174 PINEYWOODS AVENUE  Installation of Compressor Unit (Contacted by Landowner)
 o 207 PINE STREET  Deviations from Issued Certificate (Expected on Future Agenda)
• UNRESOLVED VIOLATIONS
 o 21 MOUNTAIN VIEW STREET  Did not resolve replacement windows that were part of
 the original 2023 application
 o 158 SHERMAN STREET  Replacement of Side and Front Porch Railings
 o 275 PINE STREET  Replacement of Rear Porch Railings
• RESOLVED VIOLATIONS
 o NONE
• STOP-WORK ORDERS ISSUED
 o NONE
• INQUIRIES ISSUED
 o NONE




 5|Page
 SPRINGFIELD HISTORICAL COMMISSION
 MEETING MINUTES

 THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2026

COMMISSIONERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Kevin Coffee (in-person)
Judith Crowell (absent)
Walter Kroll, Vice Chair (in-person)
Alfonso Nardi, Chair (in-person)
Vana Nespor (in-person)
Vincent Walsh (remote)
Marisa Zorzi (absent)

STAFF AND ELECTED OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE:
Andrew Strniste, Director of Community Planning (in-person)
Attorney Robert Shewchuk, Associate City Solicitor (remote)

PUBLIC IN ATTENDANCE:
Sean Mullett (554 Main Street, Somers, CT | in-person)
Carl Moccia (14 Cherryvale Avenue | in-person)
Denise Moccia (14 Cherryvale Avenue | in-person)
Craig Orn (Momentum Solar – 73 Walnut Street, Oxford, MA | in-person)
Gary White (14 Fairfield Street | in-person)
Jeffrey Casey (13 Carriage Lane, Westfield, MA | in-person)
James Balise (950 Prospect Avenue, West Springfield, MA | in-person)
Tim Ashe (251 Belmont Avenue, West Springfield, MA | in-person)
Siervo Jimenez (80 Cornell Street | in-person)
Timothy Ryan (72 Morning Side Park | in-person)
Kira Holmes (74 Walnut Street | in-person)
TJ Marshall (700 Franklin Street, Belchertown, MA | in-person)
Sarah Murray (79 Bowdoin Street | in-person)
James Sedlak (24 Spruceland Avenue | in-person)
Melissa Galik (24 Spurceland Avenue | in-person)
Donald Mitchell (35 Harvard Street | in-person)
Vandana Sareen (24 Perry Street, Watertown, MA | in-person)
James Gruber (1780 Main Street | in-person)
Trish Smith (representing 643 Union Street | remote)
Carolyn Ware (representing 643 Union Street | remote)


  I. OPENING REMARKS
 • Chair A. Nardi opened the meeting at 5:30 PM and informed the attending public of
 the Commission’s meeting procedures for reviewing applications.


 1|Page
 II. ROLL CALL
 • Chair A. Nardi proceeded with the evening’s roll call:
 COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE
 Chair Alfonso Nardi Present – In-Person
 Vice Chair Walter Kroll Present – In-Person
 Kevin Coffee Present – In-Person
 Judi Crowell Absent
 Vana Nespor Present – In-Person
 Vincent Walsh Present – Remote
 Marisa Zorzi Absent

III. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES – FEBRUARY 19, 2026
 MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 2026
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL ABSTAIN
 KEVIN COFFEE MOTION – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Commissioner K. Coffee made a motion to accept the Commission’s meeting minutes
 of February 19, 2026. The motion was seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With
 no discussion on the motion, it was approved four (4) to zero (0) with
 Commissioner W. Kroll abstaining.

IV. CONTINUED HEARING – W S BOWDOIN STREET (01680-0015)
 MOTION TO APPROVE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING AT WS BOWDOIN STREET
 (01680-0015)
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE MOTION – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The hearing on the proposed single-family dwelling on Bowdoin Street was a
 continuation from the January 15, 2026 meeting, allowing the Petitioner to present
 updated materials after a site visit by Commissioners. Stephen Jablonski,
 representing the Petitioner, opened the continued hearing by acknowledging
 community concerns raised previously, especially regarding the porch floor height,
 roofline, and façade symmetry.
 • The updated design raised the porch floor to 30 inches, bringing it closer in height
 with neighboring homes while accommodating the necessary handicap accessibility
 2|Page
 requirements. A dormer was added to the front of the building, and the bathroom
 windows were revised to include two small symmetrical windows to address
 neighborhood input. The cornice height was increased to 23 feet 5 inches, aligning
 closely with neighboring cornices, thus maintaining harmony with the streetscape.
 • S. Jablonski detailed the materials proposed, including aluminum-clad wood double-
 hung windows with a dark burgundy or black finish, Simpson doors in Nantucket
 color, Hardie plank lap siding, and 30-year architectural asphalt shingles. He
 emphasized efforts to engage the McKnight Neighborhood Council and responded to
 concerns such as the location of the handicap ramp and window design.
 • Commissioners Coffee and Nardi reported on their site visit, confirming the
 improvements addressed earlier issues with porch height and roof pitch. They
 noted that the building’s massing fits reasonably well with neighboring structures,
 although it slightly dwarfs one adjacent house. The railing design was discussed in
 detail, with a preference for historically appropriate wooden handrails with square
 spindles and wooden framed lattice beneath the porch.
 • Sara Murray from 79 Bowdoin Street supported the revisions, but still expressed
 some concern about privacy relating to bathroom windows facing the street. Prior
 to revisions made to the plans, the Springfield Preservation Trust also submitted
 correspondence encouraging designs that fit neighborhood character and suggested
 engaging architectural expertise; the Petitioner addressed a lot of the concerns
 through a subsequent update.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to approve the application as presented with
 the handrail being installed as sketched, the setback of the building to match the
 neighboring buildings, the tongue & groove floor boards of the porch being
 perpendicular to the building, the installation of trim board along porch edge, and
 the installation of framed wooden lattice. Commissioner V. Walsh seconded the
 motion. Commissioner V. Nespor inquired about the window color; S. Jablonski
 advised that they would install black windows. The motion was approved
 unanimously.


V. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING – E S LONGHILL STREET (07900-0129)
 MOTION TO CONTINUED APPLICATION TO MARCH 19, 2026 MEETING
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The hearing relating to Longhill Street is a continuation from the February 19
 meeting and involved a revised proposal for a new single-family dwelling. Siervo
 Jimenez was back before the Commission to present the application, responding to
 earlier feedback by reducing the building’s width from an initially excessive 79 feet
 to 69 feet – drawing design inspiration from a nearby historic house at 325 Longhill
 Street.

 3|Page
 • The revised design incorporated larger windows and simplified historic features,
 moving away from an initially “over the top” style. The Petitioner presented front
 and overhead views showing a more restrained façade with details intended to
 foster neighborhood compatibility. Despite these changes, Commissioners
 expressed continued concern about the building’s massing and the proportion of its
 front portico roof relative to the overall structure.
 • Particular discussion focused on the lack of side porches, which in the neighborhood
 help visually “break up” large façades and bring buildings down to human scale.
 Commissioners suggested lowering the portico roofline closer to the eave line and
 adding a side porch to better integrate the building with surrounding homes.
 • James Sedlack from 24 Spruceland Avenue opined that the proposal was not giving
 the public a clear picture as to what the building will look in relation to the
 streetscape; that the proposed design does not fit the neighborhood; and was not
 consistent with 325 Longhill Street – the inspiration of the project.
 • Denise Moccia, from 14 Cherryvale Avenue, who lives behind the property, opined
 that the building was still too big; that there is no buffer between the building and
 her property. Additional concern was vocalized about the property being vacant for
 50 years, in addition to the new build being turned into an AirB&B.
 • Carl Moccia, also from 14 Cherryvale Avenue, advised that the footprint of the
 building was still 4,000 sq. ft.
 • Chair A. Nardi read into the record additional public comment from Ralph Slate.
 • Melissa Galik from 24 Spruceland Street expressed similar concerns – that the
 design was not proportional to the streetscape; that the design impacts the
 neighborhood.
 • The Commission requested additional to-scale drawings presenting the proposed
 house in context with neighboring buildings to better evaluate its fit within the
 streetscape. The petitioner agreed to submit updated plans. Commissioner W. Kroll
 to continue the hearing to the March 19, 2026 meeting agenda. The motion was
 seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With no discussion on the motion, it was
 approved unanimously.


VI. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – 175 MILL STREET
 MOTION TO APPROVE THE SOLAR PROJECT AT 175 MILL STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Craig Orn, from Momentum Solar, represented the Petitioner relating to the
 application for the purposes to install 19 solar panels on the south roof of an
 accessory building at 175 Mill Street, along with utility equipment on the building’s
 west side. The panels and rails are dark bronze to blend with the roof, and although

 4|Page
 the conduit was to remain unpainted due to maintenance concerns, the Petitioner
 agreed to screen it with decorative lattice to minimize visibility.
 • The conduit will run five feet above grade, connecting the principal building to the
 accessory building – tucked away from public view. Commissioners appreciated the
 efforts to conceal the conduit and had no further questions. No public comments
 were received.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to accept the application relating to 175 Mill
 Street with the added suggested of installing decorative lattice along the connecting
 conduit. The motion was seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With no discussion
 on the motion, it was approved unanimously.


VII. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – 169 WESTMINSTER STREET
 MOTION TO APPROVE THE WINDOW PROJECT AT 169 WESTMINSTER STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Thomas Marshall from Yankee Home was before the Commission to present a
 proposal to replace three windows at 169 Westminster Street with white vinyl
 double-pane units without grids. Of the three windows, one window is original
 wood while the others were previous replacement. The proposal includes replacing
 a pantry window that currently features decorative diamond-pattern glass with a
 larger picture window.
 • Commissioners discussed concerns about removing the decorative muntin bars,
 especially on the pantry window, which is a rare surviving historic feature. While
 the Petitioner explained the practical reasons for replacement, Commissioners
 emphasized the importance of preserving the historic character where possible.
 • The third window is located on the rear of the building and is not visible from the
 street.
 • No public comment was provided. Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to accept
 the application as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner V.
 Nespor. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved unanimously.


VIII. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – 30 COLONY ROAD
 MOTION TO ACCEPT THE WINDOW PROJECT AT 30 COLONY ROAD
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL SECONDED – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT

 5|Page
 VANA NESPOR MOTION –YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Tim Ashe of Pella Windows represented a request to replace three wooden windows
 at 30 Colony Road with aluminum-clad wood windows matching existing grill
 patterns and colors. The installation method will be pocket replacement preserving
 both exterior and interior trim.
 • Jeb Balise, from 950 Prospect Avenue, West Springfield, Massachusetts, opined that
 the proposed project looks great.
 • Upon clarifying the grid pattern, Commissioner V. Nespor made a motion to accept
 the application as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner W. Kroll.
 With no discussion on the motion, it was approved unanimously.


IX. PRESERVATION OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT BUILDINGS – 135 LYMAN STREET
 MOTION TO LIFT THE DEMOLITION DELAY REGARDING 135 LYMAN STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION –YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Representatives Timothy Ryan, Jeff Balise, and Jeff Casey requested a waiver of the
 nine-month demolition delay for the Chapman and Brooks Block, a six-story brick
 building constructed in 1910. A comprehensive structural evaluation revealed
 severe interior deterioration including collapsed staircases, widespread mold, and
 corrosion rendering the steel frame and concrete floors beyond repair.
 • Despite the poor interior condition, the exterior brick and architectural features
 remain largely intact. The Petitioner committed to salvaging brick and decorative
 elements for reuse in future development projects. Commissioners expressed
 regret over the anticipated loss of the building, but acknowledged the safety and
 lack of viable adaptive reuse options given the building’s condition.
 • Sara Murray, from 79 Bowdoin Street, opined that the demolition of the building
 would disregard the ordinance and that this will contribute to growing vacant
 properties.
 • Kira Holmes, from 74 Walnut Street, representing the Springfield Preservation
 Trust, was opposed to the demolition and that the City should maintain its historic
 character.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to waive the nine-month demolition delay at
 135 Lyman Street. The motion was seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no
 discussion on the motion, it was approved unanimously.



 6|Page
 X. SECTION 106 REVIEW – 271 CAREW STREET

 MOTION TO APPROVE THE SECTION 106 REVIEW APPLICATION RELATING TO
 271 CAREW STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The application involved telecommunications equipment entirely within the interior
 of a building at 271 Carew Street, with no ground disturbance or impact to the
 exterior of the building. Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the
 proposed project, as presented in the submitted materials and during the evening’s
 meeting, will not be detrimental to the building and that the project will have no
 adverse impact. The motion was seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With no
 discussion on the motion, it was approved unanimously.


XI. CPA RELATED REQUEST – N S STATE STREET (11110-0045)
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDING AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR N S STATE STREET (11110-0045)
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The Commission reviewed a request for historic determination and letter of support
 for exterior repairs to the George Vincent Smith Museum, including repointing brick
 mortar, repairing and repainting wood trim, replacing cracked terracotta roof tiles,
 and restoring balustrades. The museum, built in 1896 in Italian piazza style, is a
 significant historic resource.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the George Walter Vincent Smith
 Museum is a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was
 seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was
 approved unanimously.


XII. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 49 CHESTNUT STREET
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDING AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 49 CHESTNUT STREET

 7|Page
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED –YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The Museum of Fine Arts is seeking CPA-grant funding for the purposes of in-kind
 replacement of two steel doors on the Chestnut Street side of the building to
 improve security, as well as for energy efficiency purposes while maintaining the
 original aesthetic. Though the current doors appear in good condition, they
 reportedly allow drafts of wind and are less secure.
 • The new doors replicate the existing design and materials used previously in
 window restoration efforts. Commissioners approved the application unanimously,
 noting the balance between preservation and building functionality.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the D’Amour Museum of Fine
 Arts is a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was seconded
 by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously.


XIII. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 52 SUMNER AVENUE
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDING AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 52 SUMNER AVENUE
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The requester is seeking CPA-grant funding for the purposes of restoring stained
 glass windows in critical condition and to install fire sprinklers to enhance life
 safety and protect the historic building. This follows prior CPA-funded roof and
 exterior repairs.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the building at 52 Sumner
 Avenue is a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was
 seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was
 approved unanimously.


XIV. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 7-9 STOCKBRIDGE STREET
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDING AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 7-9 STOCKBRIDGE STREET

 8|Page
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The Springfield Preservation Trust is seeking CPA grant funding to restore 9 six-
 over-six windows, two six-panel wood doors, paint the façade, remove asbestos-
 containing materials, and install new historically appropriate windows and doors.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the building at 7-9 Stockbridge
 Street is a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was
 seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With no discussion on the motion, it was
 approved unanimously.


XV. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 32 BYERS STREET (THE RAINVILLE APARTMENTS)
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDING AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 32 BYERS STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Wayfinders representatives is seeking CPA grant funding for the purposes of
 replacing existing windows with historically appropriate windows, repair the roof,
 and repoint masonry on the historic Hotel Rainville. The project has received state
 and federal approvals and will leverage CPA funding.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the building at 32 Byers Street is
 a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was seconded by
 Commissioner V. Nespor. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously.


XVI. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 68-70, 76, 84-88 BYERS STREET (NEW COURT TERRACE APARTMENTS)
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDINGS AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 68-70, 76, 84-88 BYERS STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT

 9|Page
 VANA NESPOR SECONDED – YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Similarly, Wayfinders representatives are seeking CPA grant funding for the
 purposes of renovating and window replacements are planned for three nearby
 buildings managed by Wayfinders, also involving masonry and roof repairs. These
 projects have previously received state and federal approvals and will use CPA
 funds.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to find that the buildings at 68-70, 76, 84-88
 Byers Street are historic resources and to issue a letter of support. The motion was
 seconded by Commissioner V. Nespor. With no discussion on the motion, it was
 approved unanimously.


XVII. CPA RELATED REQUEST – 643 UNION STREET
 MOTION TO FIND SUBJECT BUILDINGS AS A HISTORIC RESOURCE AND ISSUE
 LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR 643 UNION STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR YAY
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • St. John's Congregational Church representatives are seeking CPA grant funding for
 the purposes of restoring stained glass windows and completing exterior repairs on
 the adjacent food pantry building. Phase one roof and masonry work are complete,
 with this application addressing remaining porches, doors, and railings.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion To find that the building at 643 Union Street is
 a historic resource and to issue a letter of support. The motion was seconded by
 Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously.

XVIII. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATES
 • Staff Member A. Strniste informed the Commission about the Non-Applicability
 Certificates issued since the last meeting: 37 George Street (restoration work) and
 59 Ingersoll Grove (repair existing siding).
 • Letters of support were reissued for several Community Preservation Act (CPA)
 projects (140 Chestnut Street, 241 Maple Street, and 275 Maple Street) that had
 applied previously but required updated documentation or reapplication. These
 letters assist applicants in securing funding and advancing preservation work.
 • Staff reported that violation notices related to unauthorized alterations or
 maintenance issues would be issued in the coming weeks, demonstrating the
 commission’s ongoing commitment to enforcing preservation regulations.


 10 | P a g e
XIX. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMISSION
 • The Commission received no correspondence since its last meeting.

XX. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – QUORUM CALL
 • Commissioners A. Nardi, W. Kroll, V. Nespor, and K. Coffee will be present at the next
 meeting. Commissioner V. Walsh will attend remotely.
 • Staff Member A. Strniste is unavailable for the March 19, 2026 meeting. He is
 currently coordinating a potential staff substitute.

XXI. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – PUBLIC SPEAK OUT
 • No public was present to provide public comment.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by
 Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously. The Commission adjourned at 8:10 PM.




 11 | P a g e
 SPRINGFIELD HISTORICAL COMMISSION
 MEETING MINUTES

 THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

COMMISSIONERS IN ATTENDANCE:
Kevin Coffee (in-person)
Judith Crowell (absent)
Walter Kroll, Vice Chair (in-person)
Alfonso Nardi, Chair (in-person)
Vana Nespor (absent)
Vincent Walsh (remote)
Marisa Zorzi (absent)

STAFF AND ELECTED OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE:
Phil Dromey, Deputy Planning Director (in-person)
Attorney Robert Shewchuk, Associate City Solicitor (remote)

PUBLIC IN ATTENDANCE:
Dillon Shea (89 Firglade Avenue | in-person)
Gregory Bodison (168 Thompson Street | in-person)
Gary White (14 Fairfield Street | in-person)
Carl Moccia (14 Cherryvale Avenue | in-person)
Denise Moccia (14 Cherryvale Avenue | in-person)
Jim Morrissey (338 Maple Street | Bellingham, MA | in-person)
Lynn Morrissey (338 Maple Street | Bellingham, MA | in-person)
James Sedlak (24 Spruceland Avenue | in-person)
Alan Vieu (13 Sarah Lane, Belchertown, MA | in-person)


  I. OPENING REMARKS
 • Chair A. Nardi opened the meeting at 5:30 PM and informed the attending public of
 the Commission’s meeting procedures for reviewing applications.

 II. ROLL CALL
 • Chair A. Nardi proceeded with the evening’s roll call:
 COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE
 Chair Alfonso Nardi Present – In-Person
 Vice Chair Walter Kroll Present – In-Person
 Kevin Coffee Present – In-Person
 Judi Crowell Absent
 Vana Nespor Absent
 Vincent Walsh Present – Remote
 Marisa Zorzi Absent
 1|Page
III. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES – MARCH 5, 2026
 • The minutes of March 5, 2026 have been tabled to the March April 2, 2026 meeting
 agenda.

IV. NEW HEARING – 89 FIRGLADE AVENUE
 MOTION TO APPROVE ROOF VENT PROJECT AT 89 FIRGLADE AVENUE
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The landowner, Jinzy George, represented by Dillon Shea-Pennett from Wollaston
 Construction, requested approval to install a small roof vent approximately 12
 inches in size near the back ridge line of the residence at 89 Firglade Avenue, close
 to the chimney. The purpose of the vent is to improve attic ventilation and
 insulation efficiency. Commissioners reviewed photographs and site plans
 confirming that the vent would be minimally visible from the street or public areas,
 as the vent was to be located on the side and rear of the structure. The color of the
 vent, black, was confirmed to blend with the existing roof. The Commission
 emphasized the importance of ensuring that the vent is properly installed to prevent
 rainwater intrusion.
 • There were no questions or objections from Commissioners or the public.
 Commissioner V. Walsh had some technical difficulties viewing the application
 materials, but expressed no concerns after seeing the documents. The discussion
 focused mainly on confirming the vent’s size, location, and color to ensure it
 adhered to the historic district’s standards of minimal visual impact. The
 Commissioners unanimously agreed that the vent was appropriate given its discreet
 placement and functional necessity.
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion accept the application as presented. The
 motion was seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion,
 it was approved unanimously with the understanding that any changes to the vent’s
 design or location would require further review.


 V. NEW HEARING – 168 THOMPSON STREET
 MOTION TO APPROVE WINDOW PROJECT AT 168 THOMPSON STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT

 2|Page
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The landowner, Gregory Bodison, and representative Steven Greb from Window
 Nation, sought approval to replace ten existing white wooden double-hung, double-
 pane colonial-style windows with white vinyl windows of a similar style,
 maintaining the traditional interior and exterior grid patterns. The existing
 windows were original, but had storm windows painted green, which were
 inefficient and difficult to manage seasonally. The S. Greb explained that the storm
 windows’ hardware was failing, and the primary motivation for replacement was to
 improve energy efficiency and reduce maintenance costs while preserving the
 home’s historic appearance.
 • Commissioners closely examined photographs and window samples, discussing the
 fit of the new windows within the existing frames, the profile of the sashes, and the
 color consistency. Particular attention to ensuring that the vinyl windows would
 not appear bulky or out of character with the historic design was given, with
 Commissioner V. Walsh noting that the thickness of the vinyl should not create a
 visually intrusive frame. S. Greb confirmed that the full window units, including
 frames, would be replaced, and that the windows would sit tightly within the
 existing openings.
 • No public comments were made. The Commission expressed general support for
 the application as the new windows offered a practical upgrade that respected the
 historic look. Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion approve the application for
 168 Thompson Street with the white double hung, colonial style with white external
 grids. The motion was seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no further
 discussion the motion was approved unanimously. With Commissioners stipulating
 that the windows must match the style, color, and grid configuration presented in
 the application.


VI. NEW HEARINGS – 25 OXFORD STREET
 MOTION TO APPROVE WINDOW & DOOR PROJECT AT 25 OXFORD STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH SECONDED – YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • The landowner, Marjorie Moise & Marucs Maurice Greene, represented by Alan Vieu
 from Window World, sought approval for replacing three green aluminum and
 wood-framed single-pane windows and a steel green door with new white vinyl
 windows and an aluminum-clad sage green door. A. Vieu clarified that the new
 slider windows would be installed behind existing green screens on the front porch,
 maintaining the exterior appearance and minimizing visual changes from the street.
 The door replacement aimed to modernize the entrance while matching the existing
 color palette and maintaining a historically appropriate design.


 3|Page
 • Commissioners reviewed the photographs and details, noting the importance of
 preserving the existing screens and ensuring that the new windows would not alter
 the historic character. A. Vieu assured that the screens are removable and that the
 sliders would fit behind them without interference. Questions about basement
 windows were addressed; replacements in the basement would also be white vinyl
 sliders, consistent with the rest of the house.
 • No public input was given. Commissioners were satisfied that the proposed changes
 were consistent with the building’s historic character and that the materials and
 colors were appropriate. Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to approve the
 application for 25 Oxford Street regarding the replacement of three (3) green
 aluminum & wood hopper and aluminum framed single-pane windows with
 Window World (4000 series) forest green & white double pane vinyl windows (two)
 and one basement hopper and slider window; and replacing a steel green door with
 a Windsor Pinnacle swinging, aluminum clad, sage green, three-panel, double pane
 door, as presented in the application and during this evening’s hearing.
 Commissioner V. Walsh seconded the motion. With no discussion on the motion, it
 was approved unanimously.


VII. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – 21 MOUNTAINVIEW STREET (DOOR)
 MOTION TO APPROVE DOOR PROJECT AT 21 MOUNTAINVIEW STREET
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL MOTION – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Petitioners Nick Dipon and Paul Yusenko applied for a Certificate of
 Appropriateness to restore the front door at 21 Mountainview Street – the original
 door being damaged during a fire in 2022, and subsequently replaced with an
 unauthorized door. The proposed door is a custom-made replica designed to closely
 match the original door’s historic appearance. The new door will feature the same
 oak material and stained finish, maintaining the traditional look of the home. One
 notable difference is the omission of the original mail slot, and the door swing will
 be reversed, with hardware relocated accordingly to accommodate the building’s
 functional needs.
 • During the meeting, Commissioners sought clarification on the door’s design details,
 including the hardware style and finish, as these elements are significant to the
 door’s historic character. The Petitioner committed to matching the original door
 hardware as closely as possible. Commissioners stressed that any hardware
 changes would require prior approval to maintain consistency with the historic
 design. The petitioner acknowledged this and agreed to adhere strictly to the
 approved design and hardware specifications.
 • Gary White, from 14 Fairfield Street, expressed support for the project; however,
 opined that the issue could have been avoided if the proper permits were in place;
 that any subsequent changes should come back to the Commission.

 4|Page
 • Commissioner W. Kroll made a motion to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness
 for the replacement door to appear like the original door, oat in materials, stained in
 color, hardware to match the same style as the old door. The motion was seconded
 by Commissioner K. Coffee. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously.


VIII. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – 21 MOUNTAINVIEW STREET (WINDOWS)
 MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE APRIL 16 MEETING AGENDA
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE SECONDED – YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH MOTION – YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Separately, Petitioners Nick Nipon and Paul Yusenko sought a Certificate of
 Hardship to retain unauthorized vinyl windows installed after the 2022 fire. These
 windows, identified as the vinyl Max Eclipse series, were installed without prior
 approval from the Commission. The Petitioners explained that the unauthorized
 installation resulted from a misunderstanding and a lack of clear communication
 regarding the denial of the window portion of a prior application. Additionally, the
 Petitioners cited a financial hardship – stating that replacing the windows with
 approved alternatives would exceed their renovation budget significantly.
 • The Commission’s discussion focused heavily on procedural and policy issues. Staff
 acknowledged that no formal documentation had been issued to the Petitioner
 confirming the denial of the window replacement request, which contributed to the
 confusion. Commissioners emphasized that only written approvals constitute
 authorization to proceed and ignorance of denial does not legitimize work done
 without approval. Furthermore, Commissioner Walsh raised concerns about the
 hardship claim because the property is an investment intended for resale, and
 typically hardship certificates apply to owner-occupied residences.
 • No public comments were made on the window issue, but the Commissioners
 agreed that the matter required further review. They expressed the need for
 additional documentation and clearer communication from Staff to fully understand
 the situation.
 • Commissioner V. Walsh made a motion to continue the hearing to the second
 meeting in April, Thursday, April 16, 2026, to allow time for Staff to gather
 information and for Commissioners to review the case more thoroughly before
 making a final decision. The motion was seconded by Commissioner K. Coffee. With
 no other discussion, the motion was approved unanimously.


 I. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – E S PINE STREET (09715-0135)
 MOTION TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO THE APRIL 2 MEETING AGENDA
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI YAY

 5|Page
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL SECONDED – YAY
 KEVIN COFFEE YAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH MOTION – YAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • Petitioners Jim and Lynn Morrissey, from 338 Maple Street in Bellingham,
 Massachusetts, were before the Commission proposing constructing a new two-
 family dwelling on a vacant lot that had been empty for over 30 years. The design
 includes black vinyl double-hung, double-pane windows, vinyl clapboard siding of
 Cedar Knolls D4 profile in a firebrick color, a fiberglass door, and architectural
 asphalt shingles. Heat pumps would be wall-mounted and screened by a fence to
 minimize the visual impact. The Petitioners emphasized energy efficiency, long-
 term low maintenance, and compatibility with the neighborhood, highlighting that
 the vinyl siding was chosen for durability and cost-effectiveness.
 • Commissioners discussed the historic district’s typical resistance to vinyl siding,
 while acknowledging precedent from similar recent projects nearby that had
 received approval. The Petitioners expressed openness to adding a full-length front
 porch if the commission preferred, though they initially proposed a smaller porch to
 avoid encouraging use as a bus shelter due to a nearby bus stop. The discussion also
 touched on the cost differential between vinyl siding and Hardie board, with vinyl
 being significantly more affordable, but less traditional.
 • Commissioners requested additional time to review comparable projects and to
 consider siding options more carefully. The Petitioners were receptive to
 continuing the hearing. Commissioner V. Walsh made a motion to continue the
 hearing to the April 2, 2026 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
 W. Kroll. Chair A. Nardi made a made a clarification comment about the details of
 the window casings not being the same size of the corner compared to the
 rendering. Commissioner V. Walsh opined about the way the lattice was framed
 under the porch. Chair A. Nardi then commented on appreciating the full-length
 porch and opined that either porch design worked for him due to the massing of the
 design. The motion was approved unanimously.


I. NEW PUBLIC HEARING – E S LONGHILL STREET (07900-0129)
 MOTION TO APPROVE THE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING PROJECT AT E S
 LONGHILL STREET (07900-0129)
 CHAIR ALFONSO NARDI NAY
 VICE CHAIR WALTER KROLL SECONDED – NAY
 KEVIN COFFEE NAY
 JUDI CROWELL ABSENT
 VANA NESPOR ABSENT
 VINCENT WALSH MOTION – NAY
 MARISA ZORZI ABSENT

 • This application pertained to the proposed single-family dwelling on a lot with
 significant neighborhood history as open space. The petitioner, Siervo Jimenez, was
 6|Page
 absent, limiting the Commission’s ability to engage in substantive discussion.
 Commissioners expressed concerns about the proposed house’s massing and its
 proximity to the sidewalk, which they felt was inconsistent with the character of
 surrounding properties. Without the Petitioner present to address these concerns
 or offer modifications, the Commission felt compelled to deny the application.
 • Commissioners noted that a denial does not preclude reapplication, and staff was
 instructed to notify the Petitioner accordingly. Commissioner V. Walsh made a
 motion to approve the proposed application relating to ES Longhill Street. The
 motion was seconded by Commissioner W. Kroll. With no discussion on the motion,
 it was approved unanimously.

 II. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATES
 • No administrative updates were provided.
 • Deviation noted for 207 Pine Street vinyl siding; possible future commission review.

III. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – CORRESPONDENCE TO THE COMMISSION
 • Two letters from Massachusetts Historical Commission were submitted into the
 record – one relating to 186 St. James Avenue and one relating to 28 Buckingham
 Street.

IV. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – QUORUM CALL
 • The Commission did not obtain a quorum call for the next meeting.

 V. OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY BEFORE THE COMMISSION – PUBLIC SPEAK OUT
 • James Sedlak opined that the vacant property pertaining to the ES Longhill Street
 application was associated with the 251 Longhill Street property and has been
 vacant since the original house burned down in 1942. Any proposal for that
 property should take into consideration the open space.
 • Commissioner V. Walsh made a motion to adjourn. The motion was seconded by
 Commissioner W. kroll. With no discussion on the motion, it was approved
 unanimously. The Commission adjourned at 7:08 PM.




 7|Page
 &prfngfftlb 1f,t-torfcal
 <tommf--fon 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 01104
 (413) 787-6020 (office)
 (4/3) 787-6524 (fax)



 APPLICATION CHECKLIST
PROPERTY ADDRESS: E) Prt s~. oq1,S--() 1,s-
Incomplete application will NOT be accepted and scheduled. A complete and valid application MUST contain the following information:
 I) The type of Certificate the petitioner is seeking must be indicated (see Page I);
 2) The property owner's signature must appear on the application;
 3) Relevant and applicable PHOTOGRAPHS, MATERIALS and PLANS specified on the Application

 CHECKLIST

 CT APPLICATION

 Please complete the attached application and PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NEEDED.

 □ PICTURES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
 Please provide color photographs of the project area's current condition. f.or example, shou.ld the project
 pertain to replacing windows, provide a photograph of what the current windows looks like.
 G RENDERING Of PROPOSED PROJECT UPON COMPLETION
 Please provide a rendering of what the project will look like upon completion. For some products, such as
 siding, windows, doors, solar powered panels, HVAC systems (including heat pumps), this may include prod-
 uct details from the manufacturer and/or store or a brochure. For paint color-related projects, a sample of
 the color may suffice. For new construction, renderings from an architect are required.

 B PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
 Please provide specifications for any products (e.g. doors, windows, siding, solar powered panels, HVAC sys-
 tems, etc.) to be utilized during the project. Project details from the manufacturer and/or store, or a bro-
 chure, will suffice. If available. please bring physical samples of the product to the meeting date.

 [Zf LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
 If the landowner is unable to attend the hearing, correspondence shall be submitted that authorizes a repre-
 sentative to speak on their behalf about the application.

For more information, visit the City's website: www.springfield-ma.gov/planning/historic-comm or call the Office: (413) 787-6020.

 OFFICE USE ONLY
 "
LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: DECISION:
 I~ C\pk H\\I
 -fdxvofj ~t ~~~b  1
DATE RECEIVED: DECISION DATE:



HEARING DATE: DATE DISCUSSED (No HEARING):
 Mo.{~t91a~
DATE NOTICE POSTED: WAIVED BY COMMISSION:
 fv\(\fO--. S ) ~(l>:>.6
DATE NOTICE MAILED: WAIVED BY ABUTTERS:
 Mor~ s ) ~y)~b

Last Updated 0 1/30/2025
 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 01104
 (413} 787-1,020 (office}
 (413} 787-6524 (fox)



 APPLICATION TYPE
PROPERTY ADDRESS: E" 5 ~V\ ~ S1 . (L'.1 ct 7 l 5,... tJ \ ~ '5'
 APPLICATION TYPE (Select Application Type)
 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATE.NESS
 Select this type of application for those changes that are in conformance with the guidelines and/or accepta-
 ble for the particular Local Historic District.

 □ CERT/FICA TE. OF HARDSHIP
 Select this type of application for those changes that are not appropriate with the underlying District guide-
 lines, but which are necessary due to economic, physical, social, or other special conditions that apply to the
 individual property. but do not apply to the overall underlying District.


 □ CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY
 Select this type of application for those changes that affect features not controlled by the Commission (e.g.
 work that involves no change in materials, design or dimensions).

 □ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (I.E. REVIEW OF A STRUCURE IN A NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT/INDWIDUAL BUILDING)
 Select this type of application for those changes that affect a structure in a National Register District, or a
 structure that is listed as a National Register Individual Building, that utilizes public funding (local, State, or
 federal). If the structure is both within a National Register District/Individual Building and a Local Historic
 District, select one of the application types above (Appropriateness, Hardship, Non-Applicability). If the
 structure contains a Preservation Restriction and is located wlthin a National Register District/Individual
 Building, select the Preservation Agreement application type below.

 □ PRESERVATION AGREEMENT

 Selection this type of application if the structure contains a Preservation Restriction.

 □ PRESERVATION OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFCANT BUILDINGS (DEMO DELAY)
 Select this type of application if the structure is more than 75 years old and are requesting that the nine (9)
 month demo delay restriction be lifted in order to commence demolition immediately.

 □ MUNICIPAL PROTOCOL
 Select this type of application if the structure relates to a municipally (City of Springfield) owned property,
 and the project will be facilitated by the municipality (City of Springfield).

 □ SECTION I 06 REVIEW

 Select this type of application if the project is being submitted in accordance with Section I06.


Recourse: If a petitioner disagrees with a ruling by the Commission, he or she may, within -cwenty (20) days after filing the notice of such ruling
with the City Clerk) appeal to the Superior Court or Housing Court, if applicable. On the other hand, the Historical Commission may, through
Superior Court (or Housing Court), seek an injunction against any violation with a historic district's guidelines/standards. The Court may order
the removal of any such violation, or the restoration of any building or feature altered or demolition in violation of a historic district's standards.
Persons found guilty of any violations may be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) or no more than five hundred dollars ($500.00)

 Page I
 ctommtiiion 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 01104
 (413) 787-6020 (office)
 (413) 787-6524 (fax)



 APPLICATION TYPE
PROPERTY ADDRESS: ,:::- q..)
 C

 APPLICATION TYPE (Select Application Type)
 □ CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
 Select this type of application for those changes that are in conformance with the guidelines and/or accepta-
 ble for the particular Local Historic District.

 CERTIFICATE. OF HARDSHIP
 Select this type of application for those changes that are not appropriate with the underlying District guide-
 lines, but which are necessary due to economic, physical, social, or other special conditions that apply to the
 individual property, but do not apply to the overall underlying District.


 □ CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY
 Select this type of application for those changes that affect features not controlled by the Commission ( e.g.
 work that involves no change in materials, design or dimensions).

 □ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (I.E. RE.VIEW OF A STRUCURE IN A NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT/INDIVIDUAL BUILDING)
 Select this type of application for those changes that affect a structure in a National Register District, or a
 structure that is listed as a National Register Individual Building, that utilizes public funding (local, State, or
 federal). If the structure is both within a National Register District/Individual Building and a Local Historic
 District, select one of the application types above (Appropriateness, Hardship, Non-Applicability). If the
 structure contains a Preservation Restriction and is located within a National Register District/Individual
 Building, select the Preservation Agreement application type below.

 □ PRESERVATION AGREEMENT

 Selection this type of application if the structure contains a Preservation Restriction.

 □ PRESERVATION OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFCANT BUILDINGS (DEMO DE.LAY)
 Select this type of application if the structure is more than 75 years old and are requesting that the nine (9)
 month demo delay restriction be lifted in order to commence demolition immediately.

 □ MUNICIPAL PROTOCOL
 Select this type of application if the structure relates to a municipally (City of Springfield) owned property,
 and the project will be facilitated by the municipality (City of Springfield).

 □ SECTION I 06 RE.VIEW

 Select this type of application if the project is being submitted in accordance with Section I 06.


Recourse: If a petitioner disagrees with a rulrng by the Commission, he or she may, within twenty (20) days after filing the notice of such ruling
with the City Clerk, appeal to the Superior Court or Housing Court, if applicable. On the other hand, the Historical Commission may, through
Superior Court (or Housing Court), seek an injunction against any violation with a historic district's guidelines/standards. The Court may order
the removal of any such violation, or the restoration of any building or feature altered or demolition in violation of a historic district's standards.
Persons found guilty of any violations may be fined not less than ten dollars ($ f 0.00) or no more than five hundred dollars ($500.00)

La.st U clau:d <H /ZJ0 /2025 Page I
 &pdngfftlb 1E,tstodtal
 <tommfssfon 10 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 01104
 (413) 781-1,020 (oftlce)
 (413) 187-1,524 (fax)



 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE
 PROPERTY ADDRESS: ,,_ <2 oct1 <5- oc ~~
 ~ ;l (-ltW. S--r. F/K/A ~ 1 R~ l3ri. CHECK Box IF THE
 PETITIONER REQUIRES • □
 AN INTERPRETER


 OWNER ADDRESS:
 D Check box if same as property address
 OWNER PHONE. NUMBER: REPRESENTATIVE./CONTRACTOR NAME:
 ~og '>~ C(1 ~~ ':ft~ vtltS.
 OWNER EMAIL ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE/CONTRACTOR PHO NUMBER:
 Vvi_o -~a.I,\__s ~ ~ ~-c~ ~ ~
 PROPERTY CODE.: REPRESENTATIVE/CONTRACTOR EMAIL ADDRESS:
 s-~ $"' p q_ 't
 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (USE SEPARATE PAGE IF NE.EDED): PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
 \lvu-~o<U.{:_t c"~·,~::fb,tt.L+~ c9,4 \¼-V' ~th··k"¥--~\ cc s+'1 L-e (Please check all that apply)

 1,l(1- ~-¼,...- \ I z,.0tt.~ □ Windows (see Page 3)
 U..v...0 -tl l ..... "Z.. ~JV',-~..t\ l 1. '7"'t" ~.(t,,v'
 .t f. .I ') ~ ~
 t L. - '"t. "U... ~ l (.., A:.. l
 (t.(,l\.,L
 L--v....rt/7;,"<Jt .f. Wt,v -\--r,w~w.{_ □ Doors (see Page 4)
 .S+'t l--l □ Siding (see Page 5)
 ~ ~ o._ c.L..._ o( ll(.t_ "'- J..J_ v ~? □ Roofing Page I,)
 (!:ee


 □ Solar (see Page 6)
 □ Signs (see Page 1)
 □ Heat Pumps (see ,page 7)
 □ Paint (see Page 8)
 □ Renovations (e.g. Porches) (see
 Page 8) .

 cg/New Construction (all of the above)

 D Other Projects (see Page 9):

D Check box ifproperty owner will be in attendance at the hearing. If not, correspondence from the property owner authorizing a representative
 to present the plication is required.




 DATE

 Page 2
 I !

 WINDOWS
Q Check box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings/brochure of the proposed windows.
□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing windows.
G3 Check box indicating that you are aware of the City's Window Guidelines (click here).

Will the Dimensions of the Windows Change: □Yes (Please Provide Details Below Under Additional Information) □No
PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE CONDJTIONS OF THE CURRENT WINDOWS:




 NJ._w f C,tA-;;{fYtt cA--: {) II\ - S....e.{, PlM9 4 "'d AlltJctl t ~ t)tA__


 Wu,•,d<9w0 r).J..v CIA_yv" <t t6w- ~ Op._tL ~ '{ et,cl~ s
PLEASE PROVIDE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE THE WINDOWS:




NUMBER OF WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED/ADDED:
 '? ~ WtM--dc,wC,.
NEW WINDOW MANUFACTURER:

MODEL NUMBER(s):




 Ex/STING PROPOSED

MATERIAL (e.g. wood, vinyl, aluminum, etc):
 \)~ 1

ExTERNAL COLOR(S) (e.g. black, white, etc):
 tBkcit..
GRID PLACEMENT {Interior or Exterior):
 AJ""" -Q.
GRID PATTERN (e.g. twa--0ver-two;six-over-one, etc):
 JJrJ ~



WINDOW STYLE{S) (e.g. double-hung, etc):
 do tc~'- liv..~
GLASS TYPE(S) (e.g. single-pane, double-pane, etc):
 dv(J._0...e /?a..N._

ADDITIONAL INFOMRATION:
 j/J_Wr Cov__~+-v((_c.+t~ Wth.dou9~ ,w rrl low ~o._(4t 1 (-luit..._fokv-tJ-ea:tO~ .
  Co ,aD(\ (!_ (~ f/4__~ • r-g {c,_c.fr._ J_ y..;-f.£ v-t t)✓ (j.HTk. (J.'(,.J...+{ --fv <.:.~ e_ ~ ~ , {'"t<tvo-tti C~
 ~ O t.- ~ l,e tt UA~ t;) l£Lc.Jt,_ JJ{.rt.,R.vt-b✓ -()) (.vtl::fo ,u l > d t9-¼.b,o fw ~ cJ f. Cl-- Q~ t , _ k,(
  C,l_\1 wket..Q. ~w d9~u(,,~ utV'\.clQ tJ

 Page3
 Manufacturing
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


 www.lansingbp.com Distributor Quote Detail

BILL TO: SIDPTO: Lansing Building Products
LANSING SPRINGFIELD MA LANSING SPRINGFIELD MA
PO BOX6649 175 CARANDO DRIVE
RICHMOND, VA 23230-0000 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01104-3276
Phone·. (804) 266 - 8893 Fax: (804)26i -6743 Phone·. (4i3)73i -7700 Fax·.

 QUOTEN,BR OIIDEREDBY JOBNAME STATUS
 6364847 1141375 JIM BLACK WINDOWS-6364847 None

 2/12/2026 Quote Only



 LINE# DESCRIPTION QTY .UNIT PRICE EX'.l'.ENDED
 10000-1 Classic DH, Complete Unit, Unit Size 32 x 64, Overall Unit Size 32 x 64, RO $712.88 $712.88
 32.5 x 64.5, New Construction, Unit Color= White, Prefinished Unit=
 Laminate, Laminate Surface= Exterior Only, fa.ierior Laminate Color= Matte
 Black Laminate
 Unit 1 Lower Glass: Glass Width= 26.6875,
 Unit 1 Upper Glass: Glass Width= 25.6875, Glass Height= 29.375, SunGain
 PLUS, Double Glazed, Double Low-E 180 RS, Argon Filled, Standard Strength,
 Label Name = Harvey, Lock Option= Double, White, Sash Limit Devices =
 Night Latch, Lift Rail Options = None/Standard, Full FlexScreen, Fiberglass
 32"'··-
 Mesh, Design Pressure Rating= DP40, Flat Casing w/ Sill Nose, White, - R0,32.5"
 Integral J Fin, Inside Extension Jamb Receiver Pocket= Yes, Extension Jamb=
 6 9/16", Primed, 4 Side Factory Applied
 E.Star Zone: North= Yes, E.Star Zone: North-Central= No, E.Star Zone: South
 = No, E.Star Zone: South-Central= No, Clear Opening Width= 27, Clear
 Opening Height= 26.875, Clear Opening Square Footage= 5.04, U-Factor =
 0.25, SHGC = 0.48, Construction Method= Fully Welded
 Pricing Details
 Lower Glass Low-E Add-On $20.58
 Upper Glass Low-E Add-On $20.58
 Lower Glass Argon Add-On $2.09
 Upper Glass Argon Add-On $2.09
 Classic Fully Welded DH Base Charge $222.41
 Lower Glass Low-E RS Add-On $16.51
 Upper Glass Low-E RS Add-On $16.51
 Vinyl-DH-SH Screen Add-On $42.95
 Prefinish Stock Color Unit $182.56
 Wrapping E:\1:erior Casing Add-On $97.84
 Wrapping Ex--tension Jamb Add-On $53.46
 Wrapping Nail Fin Add-On $35.30




Last Updated: 2/24/2026 3:34 PM UTC Page: 1 / 2 Printed: 2/24/2026 3:34 PM UTC
 .
 DOORS
Q' Check box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings/brochure of the proposed door{s).

□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing door{s).
Will the Dimensions of the Door(s) Change: □Yes {Please Provide Details Below Under Additional Information) GNo

PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE CONDITIONS OF THE CURRENT DooR(S):




PLEASE PROVIDE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE. THE DOOR(S):



 ))J.:i) ~-+-vl{d-/ol,(__ - Icsta( d+i 5 dtxJv')
 €.w_v~ 4 OJ ti-l N tu.<-~i > ln..~J.d--tol cltJ-0"' ;, ct) (11-.__ LfJW -~v-a-~


NUMBER OF DOOR(S) TO BE REPLACED/ADDED:

NEW DOOR MANUFACTURER:


MODEL NUMBER(S):




 Ex/STING PROPOSED


 F\. (,.,I ✓ G ( c.JL-,1
MATERIAL (e.g. steel, fiberglass, etc):
 ~--
 "

 I
ExTE.RNAL COLOR(S) (e.g. black, white, etc):
 T~C>
DOOR STYLE(S) (e.g. calonial, etc):

PANEL PATTERN (e.g. single; two panel, etc):




GLASS PLACEMENT:

GLASS TYPE.(S) (e.g. single-pane, double-pane, etc):


ADDITIONAL INFOMRAT/ON: Dobv:t<l'p)~d. ~ f;_½tv-q leuLAi L\ll.,W~o( &ev5
 ~f--t. (/4»--oJ:t . {)do'V (!c, \0 v'Tf/;;?Q ivt.ci ~)J__ul:u...<J_
  )t j.JJ_ fM.fl»:(
 pf__
 }v(.c,_ '). -r:: B_q_ p~,,J:Jo( /4 Cl CJ:. r:.d. ,J_ '7 6- v uJ (J._v .,, l
 4-,~ (/£9 t '1>
 [laiU
 ~
 /{)_ ~ fu ~ cwM ~ ~ ev uit-t ~~tv..cL d ';7 W~ C1Al[.i ci o-~ ✓
 ~ ti' (,VI, dJ $ t'V\()V' ,e_ 0o_ ~'\p ~cL l~ (} IL. ');(){)V' ~ ~ ci.J.C.O .,.i);;;;.{_ tv,..,(f W,.(}-0 IA._
 ll,N:L w/Aftl (:/') r~• Aqa<6\ (!:£YVt (>u.rr> V~'{.~ <t~ ::rf.Jq__(\)t~ol~~~•v.~:._
 Page 4
(LMC) KOOPMAN LUMBER Quote
476 OAK STREET Quo#: 549485
DEALER# 381400 (f Price: Retail
INDIAN ORCHARD MA 01151
(413) 543-4100 Route: seas
Phone: Page: 1 of 2
 Quote: 02/25/26
To:
 Entd By: WEB
 Printed
 Date: 02/25/26
 Time: 08:16 AM
 Prepared by: Mitch KANIA mkania@koopmanlumber.com
 In: NOT ON FILE Customer Instructions
 IF SHIPPING 10 OR MORE COLUMNS
 Your Order: MORRISEY DUPLEX Out: LEO PIZZOFERRATO PLEASE PALLETIZE WHEN POSSIBLE



 Unit Net
 Descriotion Quantitv U/M Price Extended Line#
 3/0X6/8 BELV SMOOTH, COMPOSITE 5.00 EA 778.97 3,894.85 0001.00
 EDGE BLS 135-05E-4 , 4 PANEL,
 FAN 5 LITE IG EXT GRIDS, LHIS,
 P&FJ 6-9/16 FRAMESAVER, Z-FEN
 ADJ ALUM SILL FORCE 5, DULL
 CHROME US26D BALL BEARING RC
 HNG, 5/4X4 PVC W/"J" CHNL CSG,
 BORED LOCK & DB, 2-3/8 BKST,
 5-1/2" O.C., 2-1/8" DB FACE
 RO: 38-1/4" X82-1/2"
 Ref.#:ext.doors
 LEFT HAND INSWING



 Customer sign-off or email
 approval is required for
 Koopman Lumber to place an
 order with any custom built or
 special order items. Customer;
 upon signature. is agreeing to
 the following terms:
 All sales are final on
 custom-built orders. All other
 special orders require vendor
 approval to return and will
 carry a 25% restock fee.
 Certain special-order items




 'Ifr.ank__'You :For 'Your 'Business!
 MASONITE. Fiberglass Doors

Performance based on assembled door units utilizing Masonite door panels, typical door lites, NFRC default
wood frame and thermal broken sills.
 ENERGY PERFORMANCE RATINGS,,,
 U-Factor (Btu/hr-ft'-°F) / Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC)




PIIODUCT DESCRIPTION
DEFAULT FRAME
 i
 1/4Ute 1/2Llte
 □
 3/4Ute
 D
 Full Uta
 S4101n' S900 In' SllODln' >110Dln'

 0.20 I 0.09 0.23 / 0.16 0.26 /0.21 0.30/0.27

 0.19 I o.oa 0.21 / 0.14 0.23 I 0.18 0.26/0.24N

 0.19 I 0.08 0.22 I 0.14 0.24 I o.18 0.28 / 0.24

 0.201 o.oa 0.24 /0.14 0.27 /0.18 5 0.31/0.24

 0.19 I 0.09 0.22 I 0.16 0.24 / 0.22 0.25/0.19

 0.21 / 0.09 0.25 / 0.17 0.28/0.23 5 0.32/0.30

 N/A 0.27 /0.17 0.31 / 0.22 0.36/0.29

 N/A 0.24 /0.13 0.27 / 0.17 5 0.30/0.16

 0.19 I o.os 0.21 / 0.09 0.23 / 0.13 0.24 I 0.16
 0.19 I 0.05 0.21 / 0.08 0.23 / 0.11 0.24 / 0.15
 0.20 I 0.09 0.23 / 0.16 0.26 I 0.22 0.29/0.28

 0.20 / 0.08 0.26 I 0.19 0.30/ 0.25

 0.23 / 0.10 0.28/0.19 0.31 / 0.26 0.37 / 0.34

 0.23 / 0.09 0.28 / 0.17 0.32/0.23 0.38 / 0.30

 0.22 / 0.10 0.26/0.19 o.30 I 0.26 0.35/ 0.34

 0.22 / 0.09 0.27 /0.17 0.31 / 0.23 0.35/0.30

 N/A 0.22 / 0.09 0.24 I 0.12 0.26 I 0.16
 N/A 0.27/0.17 0.30/0.22 0.35 /0.30
 Flush or Embossed (Opaque) O. lS I 0.01
 Logan or Lincoln Park (Opaque) 0.17 I 0.01
 Air 1.e111case S0.3 dm/ft'
 Note: Sold values meet ENERGYSTAR 7/J U-factor and SHGC qualfflcation criteria In all 50 states,
 Test Report# STN22003-MM
 "= Northern and North central climate zone only, s = South Central and Southern climate zones only.
 *See Product Code Structure




 Energy performance values have been established in accordance with International Energy Conservation Code(IECC);
 U-factors determined in accordance to NFRC 100 & SHGC values determined In accordance to NFRC 200.
 Based on 2'0" door unit width or greater (no sidelltes).

 OUrconlloulnj;-ilfflaf-!mp«Mm<n!mr,l,.,s~~ond--lM>j<atoch:neo---
 (C) 2023 Masonite International Corporation. All Rights Reserved. 06/23
 SIDING
Qlcieck box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings of the proposed siding.

□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing siding.
NEW SIDING MANUFACTURER:
 A}n v !J. I.A d .JJ..l l llf-: \. v e_
 ~ -·ht)l- 1)
MODEL NUMBER(S):
 Cl...d G. V (L,-._& Ll ':,
BUILDING SIDE(S) FOR PROPOSED SIDING: /4.q q St. t1~ s
 ExlSTING PROPOSED

MATERIAL(e.g. wood, stucco, brick, non-wood shingle):
 VllAJ.i {
SIDING PATTERN (e.g. clopboard, bevel etc):
 b- L{ (n Clc,_ . D h,1 a.).t'AY >
WINDOW CASING DIMENSIONS:
 ?:/'
DOOR CASING DIMENSIONS:
 3''
CORNER BOARD DIMENSIONS: 6.,'f1.. Cl .dJ.R r.#r, tl,d
CORNICES DIMENSIONS:
 )J (4-
FRIEZE BOARD DIMENSIONS: fi(A-
SHUTTER DIMENSIONS: t <.(\J-fuik.- ~ (u l.~uJ k.t.tq Q
PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE CONDITIONS OF THE Ex/STING SIDING:

 Af f
 ~ /4...IJ- l ') ~ VLWJ l g, c,d_ ✓ , p l / ' ~ CJ-/( I
 li l

 t
 ~ ~ cl t k... -1_a_e,l ~p~ lfJ.JU- "> i V'- t ~ {))v?._µ._ •
 -9,uct"-tc~ ;)...O -c ;J__ l? _ :J- l 7  /)lv,__g__ 9-t •
 4 '1. l r(vJ_ ON--~ ~:rt.;;_ '>1 ~iv~ s-e.

PLEASE PROVIDE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE THE SIDING:




ADDITIONAL INFOMRATION: ·vv' t, ~ 0- ~ ~ d_ ~ l S jJ (} ..,..(QA(/,1_ 'l ~O¼.u\
 °"-pfv o-W.J ~v- Uv<--- LR 0wU...;> d Q, \", lA."- c:L2 fl Pi-I/.{ S... .
 Qte\~1..d.~ C19..-~S OJv_ pvcJftl--U~ S 1/l-11 UJLCb~ J..,t--fwV'
 ~l ti...:{._p J o v ~ -t4.J•"-d 12,L d
 w\,.,__ct O 0 ()J,t-._L dcJQV ct,4~~{ 5,
 > ll
 9~v-~ (j/l s k..Uu.JV\
 &c1a.J./'t~ (_~ '7 [; lti()l.q_ (<A__ bA1\ +.-~ CCL~ (JL . 9 ~

 Page 5
Cedar Knolls rM Vinyl Siding PROFILES COLORS (29)
 D4 • White
Cedar Knolls Vinyl Siding panels are manufactured to the following 2-4" Exposure • Beige
specifications. 12'6" Length • Champagne
 24 pieces/carton • Sierra*
MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS 2 squares/carton • Cream
All products meet or exceed the Standard Specification for Rigid PVC
 D5 • Yellow
Siding (ASTM D-3679) and its referenced documents. An independent
 2~5" Exposure • Wheat
laboratory through unannounced inspection of all manufacturing
facilities verifies the conformance to this specification. ASTM D-3679
 12' Length • Sandstone
 20 pieces/cation • Mocha*
is the specification used by building code authorities. Where not defined
 2 squares/carton
in ASTM D-3679, products also meet Norandex Stringent Quality •Russet+
Control Standards. D5 Dutchlap • Maverick Brown +
 2-5" Exposure • Firebrick +
PHYSICAL DATA 12' Length
Panel Thickness: .044" (+/-.001") • Cactus
 20 pieces/carton
Panel Projection: 5/8" • Fern*
 2 squares/cation
Color: Uniformity is spectrophotometrically controlled. •Khaki*
Texture: Natural Cedar embossed woodgrain pattern. • Olive*
Lock: Optically measured and controlled. • Myrtle+
Gloss: Uniform low gloss maintained with a 75° glossmeter. • Silver
 • Smoke*
PRODUCT TEST DATA • Granite*
 Heat Shrinkage: <3%at 160°F • Seaport+
 Impact Resistance Mean Failure Energy: Surface > 60 in. lb. • Geneva Blue *
 Distortion: None at 120°F • Steel Blue+
 Length: Within- l /4" specification • Deep Water +
 Warp/Camber: <1/8" • Graphite+
 Max Sustained Windload Test Pressure: 41.7 psf •Carbon+
 Standard Windload Design Pressure Rating: 56.0 ps~ • Rustic Cedar +
 Maximum Windspeed: 152 MPH* (ASD) • Acadia Green +
 Coefficient of Linear Expansion (in/in/"F) <4.5xl0·5
 • Jamestown Blue+

* Windspeed calculations based on VSI, ASTM D3679-17, ASCE 7-16, 30 ft. high, Exposure B
 • Premium Colors featuring
 ColorHold® capping resins, a UV-
FIRE RESISTANCE Stable acrylic polymer
All siding, soffit, and accessories distributed by Norandex have a Class A flame spread classification per 2021
International Residential Code (!RC) and International Building Code (!BC). + Designer Collection Color
 ASTM E84: ASTM 01929:
 Flame Spread Index: ::;25 Self-Ignition Temperature: 860°F
 Smoke Developed Index: >450 ASTMD635:
 Fuel Contribution: 0 Classified: CC I**

** Tested specimens did not burn at 25 mm mark. Material was shown to be self-extinguishing. Therefore no
average time of burning or average extent of burning can be calculated. For more information obtain a brochure on
the fire properties of siding by contacting the Vinyl Siding Institute at .»Jlat:.;Wl:W!!l.in&&r&


RELEVANT CODES AND REGULATIONS COMPLIANCE
ASTM D-3679, Florida Building Code Approval - FLI2500, Intertek CCRR-0184
 Reviewed: CT NJS 9/22/2022
Vinyl Siding Institute (VSI) PCL-080 I, PER-0803
THE LOOK OF WOOD, THE VALUE OF VINYL

 Pu,fil~ C' Ccl.,r Shtm•n: DttuW~ -1~ s1~m1.
 ·,1/. :...- - - - - - ·
FEATURES AND BENEFITS

 .044" Panel thickness with a natural cedar embossed
 woodgrain pattern

 A 5 /8' panel projection provides rigidity and costs deep,
 appealing shadow lines



 A heavy duty extended return leg snaps rightly Into the
 TitanBarl' Reinforced Nail Hem which is double the thickness
 of the siding panel under the nail head, for an installation
 that's solid, secure and protects against panel blow off in
 adverse weather conditions



 BitanBar· NailRJGHT
 Jltlllf'..._HJfMl.•t• ····-"··--------~


 Xlok'" Technology combines the TitonBar,Reinforced Nail
 Hem and the Nail RIGHT"' Siding lnstollotion System, two
 innovations that help ensure the siding is securely interlocked
 and properly affixed to the wall


 C6LGRflOLD"
 ,.(Jf/'-y;.,l,7-

 ColorHold is a highly-durable capstack that resists fading and
 discoloring and is bocked by a limited Lifetime Transferable
 Warranty• including Lifetime Fode Protection
 "'Vi:.11 www.norondox.com io \'l(:W worroniy dotoib




 Matching and contrasting soffit, accessories, shakes and
 shingles available to give your home a one-of-a-kind
 look




 ~ ~-.,
 ,,JIii!.
 Home innovation WAt4TNIR
 NCI~ CUEN ClitTIFn1D.-


 ------
 -
 WC)Uil.Ct tnlQlNCl' ,_,,,,.
COLOR AVAILABILITY

29 BEAUTIFUL COLORS

 WHITE



 BEIGE



 CREAM



 YELLOW



 CHAMPAGNE



 WHEAT SILVER
  Universal Vinyl Siding
  Accessories I
 I
  Product Code/Dascrlpt/on
 Color Availability
  TFOP55 While




 •
 Traditional 5-1/2"
 light Colors
 Outside Corner Post Cameo
 with Foam Insert Desert Sand
 • Length: 20' Wlcker
 • 4 PcsJCtn. Classic Color
 Pebb/eslone Clay
 • 67 Lbs./ctn.

 FFOP55
Fluted 5*1/2"
 While

 "',"
 -
Outside Corner
Post with Foam Insert
• Length: 20'
• 4 PcsJCtn.
• 67 Lbs./Ctn.

LINORS
Corner Starter and
rnsert
 While 4
• Length: 20'




 '
• 10 PcsJCtn.
• 68 Lbs./Gtn.• .;::,7i~~
 ROOFING
Q Check box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings of the proposed roofing.


□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing roofing.
 eXISTlNG PROPOSED

ROOF STYLE. (e.g. gable, hip, mansard, etc):
 Gctttk
MATERIAL (e.g. asphalt shingle, slate, claytile, eu:):
 n_c,n,~ s.c.-.~G, ~<.P
 V [.,
PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE CONDITIONS OF THE eXISTING ROOFING:




 'Pv 11 ~i,-u cl )J.ltJ ~ ¼'u. cl-w,
PLEASE PROV/DE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE THE ROOFING:




ADDITIONAL INFOMRAT/ON:
 pv-oJu..e,--f A.di c:i d  J l~ Qh ~
 Ttv\1...V.,..lt~ {-l-·v ~ Cc9t&V' ts Ci1..a_v cr9 0t.. {
 7
 !Lu ~ ~ o ( .



 SOLAR
 -
 WILL THE. MATERIAL OF THE. ROOF BE CHANGING AS PART OF

 THIS PROJECT? - YES (PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFO ABOVE)

 No

 □ Check box indicating that you are submitting plans of the proposed solar project.
 □ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing roofing.
ROOF MATE.RIAL (e.g. asphalt shingle, slate, day tile, eu:):

 NUMBER OF SOLAR POWERED PANELS:


SOLAR MANUFACTURER:


 LOCATION OF SOLAR POWERED PANELS (e.g. north side ofrooO:


 LOCATION OF MAIN SE.RV/CE PANEL & METER (e.g. rear of building):


 LOCATION OF OTHER El.E.CTRICAL COMPONENTS (e.g. rear of building):


 LOCATION OF CONDUIT (e.g. side of building, inside the house):


 PROPOSED COLOR OF CONDUIT (e.g. silver, some as house):

Last Upci:Jted ;J: i J30/2fJ2E Page 6
 It's never just a roof. It's peace of mind.




·•



 We protect what matters mosf'
The GAF Lifetime· Roofing System

 1. Leak Barrier
 2. Roof Deck Protection
3. Starter Strip Shingles
4. Lifetime· Shingles
5. Cobra® Attic Ventilation
 Ridge Gap Shingles
 Visit gaf.com/LRS for qualifying products.




 Install any GAF Lifetin,e
 Shingle and anv 3 qualifying
 GAF accessories ond get o
 on
 your quc::ifying GAF products
 plus non-proratecl coverc:ge
 for the first 10 veers. For sven1




 stronger coveroge, osi. \10ur
 GAF factory-certiTied controcl"'o{'
 gaf.com/system about enhonced GJ\F .'cn-ronlies.
 1 1
 /




tContractors are independent and are not employees or agents of GAF. See applicable warranty for eligibility requirements, coverage and restrictions.
• Lifetime refers to the length of warranty coverage provided and means as long as the original individual owner(s) of a single-family detached residence [ or eligible
  second owner(s)J owns the property where the qualifying GAF products are installed. For other owners/structures, Lifetime coverage is not applicable. Lifetime
  coverage on shingles requires use of GAF Lifetime shingles only. See GAF Shingle & Accessory limited Warranty for complete coverage and restrictions. Lifetime
  coverage on shingles and accessories requires use of any GAF Lifetime Shingle and any 3 qualifying GAF accessories. See GAF Roofing System Limited Warranty
  for complete coverage and restrictions. Visit gaf.com/LRS for qualifying GAF products,
 SIGNS

□ Check box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings of the proposed sign(s).
□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing sign(s).
  I APPLICATION TYPE:
 I ID REPLACEMENT SIGN
 I ID NEW SIGN
 I I
  I ILLUMINATION:
 I ID NON-ILLUMINATED
 I I□ ILLUMINATED
 I I
NUMBER OF SIGNS TO BE REPLACED/ADDED:

SIGN MANUFACTURER:

 E.xlSTING PROPOSED

MATERIAL (e.g. wood, Yinyl, aluminum, etc):

COLOR(S) (e.g. black, white, etc):

DIMENSIONS:

PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE. CONDITIONS OF THE Ex/STING SIGN:




PLEASE PROVIDE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE THE SIGN (E.G. DETERIORATION, NEW BUSINESS, ETC.):




ADDITIONAL INFOMRATION:




 HEAT PUMPS

□ Check box indicating that you are submitting plans of the proposed heat pump project.
□ Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing conditions of the applicable building side(s).
SIDING MATERIAL (e.g. wood, vinyl brick, etc):
 'v.-o--,~cl - (/lf./Y L
HEAT PUMP MANUFACTURER:
 C.c>~4 .... ttt,,;.1)
NUMBER OF COMPRESSOR UNITS:
 3 ..,. Tkv--«-
LOCATION OF COMPRESSOR UNITS (e.g. rear side of building):
 $1-d-t WG!.-Q., [L{,1D()..(_$tu1u.,lo,---(_r QLq_k:-l- ~\ d....
LOCATION OF OTHER El.E.CTRICAL COMPONENTS (e.g. rear of building):
 K.~w 6'+ L1> .4+ ~ ,d..--t - ~ .0 lu."' t.,
LOCATION OF CONDUIT (e.g. side of building, inside the house):
 (~ 'iw. ✓~o.."' t (~11' l L d t',l)u.._l\.<td Q ll (l Ft >1.._ll\t. ;f
 L

PROPOSED COLOR OF CONDUIT (e.g. silver, some as house): l <:; t 1-L?C.d.,e
 J.1..L,t r.JJ11,,D., ,,; r>IJW?,
 V
 Page 7
 OTHER PROJECTS

 Ex/STING CONDITIONS/DESCRIPTION




 .j-»- A \\ {), d,,_o( ;{ ~·1 0., r ~ s
-r; 't1,.i_ ~~'T of S'1,cS_JuJ ~ < r i f ~ : (T,p/.,rt''i fM:. '>
 2 3:)· 2. 3 ~ P S··L g V'-. ec-~Apdvvw4 ~ 1
 tY'-l

 (~t/ll\_~I\.dd tl9~~lvt~ - ,3Lt.A-H l<l 1 {)

At Rt, :,s rf!.v s-t. (- ~ r1 ~4 \t,,.._ ,0--t f~ s u1.t ,.r0f0.__
 S0Aj-f e-i fv~~ : :J.. 3 ~ PtM Si, L~zf+lz9w-'\ l~-r
 ,~)

Vc,J_ow---1: Ln - S, "-~J .£cl pv0M (Lo 1)-{v- R!Jiki f /.../4)

 PROPOSED CONDITIONS/DESCRIPTION



 s~ L{ c_ +l~(A1 ~t... pv&f e Ril~ ~ 1v
 'ill Li_{l-t;- 1J 5k~~d r n ~ G;f f2«1L~ Pµ-i,,)
h_~ L.~ ~\ ~ Jl' ~ 7 v t pi,vt.{ x-
 /J- pf v .W c/._ ~v ~~ w pv,_d,hl,,Lj A,1J'~ Ho_vo½ ~,p
2 PW,~), l~ wUdl-t 1 p~ '.
 2 l ~ ~ Z:J.7 Olv-vt S-r •
 J\ ff v HNcf !u5 o.___ f-l_ v<d.5 k, ii' •
ClYLd. 9,''"' t t--1 ~l,_V\"-~ 4 {) vL 6 H ,"" -0 C:\i<•1A i/' 61) f tY',.{ U''--'L

 -~v!Y'k >i . e1. "--;;,,- l z. 3 ~ ~

 Page 9
Office of Community
Development & Housing
1600 East Columbus Avenue
Springfield, MA 01103
Phone (413) 787-6500
Fax (413) 787-6515



 THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

 January 22, 2026

 Springfield Ventures Realty Trust
 Attn: James Morrissey
 338 Maple Street
 Bellingham, MA 02019

 Re: Bid #26-051-Purchase and Redevelopment of ES Pine Street (09715-0135)

 Dear Mr. Morrissey,

 The City of Springfield through its RFP Review Committee has recommended that Springfield Ventures
 Realty Trust., be designated as preferred developer for the property at ES Pine Street (09715-0135).
 Mayor Samo has reviewed and approved this recommendation.

 I am pleased to extend a preferred developer designation for this property to Springfield Ventures Realty
 Trust based upon the conditions and timelines outlined with this letter. Please note, final approval for the
 property transfer will not occur until after the successful completion of the conditions included within this
 preferred developer designation and a final vote of the Springfield City Council.

 The preferred developer designation will be active for a period of three (3) months from the date of this
 letter. The designation includes the following conditions and will expire on April 30, 2026, unless
 otherwise extended by the City in writing:

 1. Provide an updated scaled site plan to the City of Springfield, Office of Planning and Economic
 Development that includes the addition of on-site parking marked on the site plan.

 2. The property at ES Pine Street (09715-013 5) is located within a Local Historic District. You
 must obtain approval of the proposed plans from the Springfield Historic Commission.
 Submission of the application or questions regarding this process may be directed to Andrew
 Strniste (astrniste@springfieldcityhall.com) at 413-787-6020.

 3. Submit updated costs estimates to reflect any changes required by the Springfield Historic
 Commission and documentation of any necessary supplemental financing to the City of
 Springfield, Office of Housing & Community Development at 1600 East Columbus Avenue. For
 questions regarding requirements may be directed to Tina Quagliato-Sullivan
 (tquagliato(a),springfieldcityhall.com) or Robert DeMusis at (rdemusis@springfieldcityhall.com)
 at 413-787-6500.
 4. Springfield Ventures Realty Trust will be required to ensure all outstanding financial obligations
 (taxes, fees, fines, etc.) owed to the City of Springfield have been paid in full. Enclosed are
 copies of outstanding financial obligations owed by Springfield Ventures Realty Trust as of
 December 2025 .

 5. Submission of the following required forms for all members of the partnership included in the
 development:
 1. Affidavit- Disclosure of Property Owned
 11. Affidavit - Pursuant to M.G.L. c. 60, § 77B & submit a copy of both sides of
 current State issued identification


If you have any questions, concerns or require additional information, please contact Robert DeMusis or
myself at (413) 787-6500.

Congratulations! We look forward to working with you on this project.




- e~ ~
Tina uagliato Sullivan, Deputy Development Officer
Housing, Community Services & Sustainability
 II I
 I.ti

 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED



 I

 G----




 N 82"47'26" W ............... ·: .' .• ·:

 PROPOSED 6' VINYL
 PRIVACY FENCE


 I PRIVACY SLATS TO BE INSTALLED
 IN EXISTING CHAIN LINKED FENCE
 PREPARED FOR:
 JAMES MORRISSEY


 -----.""""'"'P"""!'"--,._o_WN
 __E_R_:____
 c_lT_Y_o_F_s_P_R_IN_,G....,FI_E_LD
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,_ _ _ _ _ _P_L_A_N_o_F_LA_N_D_A_T_:_ _ _ _ _ _ ___

 ADDRESS: F/K/A 227 PINE STREET
 SPRINGFIELD, MA DATE: 2/11/2026 SCALE: 1" = 2C/
Q 20 40 60
 HAMPDEN COUNTYBOOl<OFPLANS: SMITH ASSOCIATES
 PAGENO.: LOTNO.: SURVEYORS INC
 1
 DEED BOOK: 17017 •

 -PAGE
 - - NO.:
 - - - - 504
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46B BALDWIN ST.· EAST  LONGMEADOW, MA- 01028
 (413) 525-8801 SMITHASSOClATESSURVEYORS@HOlMAIL.COM
 ,.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24 1- '1' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __,. J<.--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 24' - 'l"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.,



 12'-S' _ _ _ _ __,,___ _ _ _ _1 2 ' - 4 ' 1



 I

 , 1

 .1 'I
 I


 'f
 ,._
 I



 1 I




 , 1
 _ _,,_.__+-_ _ _ 1s 1-o•_ _ _ _+-_..,,__4'-t0, 1 --f

 1I
 BEDRG\'.JM 'I
 1I
 I
 1I
 1 I
 I
 7 1- 1¾1 _ 1---------=~ BEDRG\'.JM
 'I
 I
 ~'O ~-lb ~# 1I
 ,tit~ 11t ~d' I


 □ ~
 I I
 , 1
 KITCHEN I -CL-reET - -'&-
 1'
 1I

 n ,
 11
 la, 11
 ;.'"\1~ ~ I L_ a..osEL._
 -c.-:+-
 - _:? ~
 .,.
 ' 11
 11
 1I
 1I
 1I
 --1-1----1----'l.-j ! I 11

 ~~-1~_--1,, N@j,",'\c •• ;a 11 1I
 : I 11
 11
 11 , 1
 c:::::J
 0 -.~I ,,_ _,.._;.N
 'f 0 I'
 1 I
 11
 5>
 BATHRM
 ~ , ~"' 4 BEDRG\'.JM --+;;:
 0
 " 11
 11
 I
 11
 I




 i~r
 1I
 t-::::===~ = 1
 ,..~,'ll._,__->I.- I 1I



 ~ (
 1 I


 ( ·] ~ i I~==;::;:::;::;:::;:::;:====: -
 t l ' = = = =B
 =ED=RG\'.JM
 = = = ~ ~- - ~ + - - ; ,
 +- 11
 11
 I




 ~~+~• ~
 'SCAN QR CODE FOR ~GITAL FILE"
 , 1

 !Ill~~ 1'
 11


 ! ~
 11




l s-,,'r7t 1'
 ~s•,•_d~ ~c
 .,~ 11
 11




 _f
 Rev: Dote: Oes-criptlon: NAME
 I:
 11 01 Z/13/U FOR APPROVAL
 11

 LIVING RG\'.JM : I
 • 'I




t-
 cos~= ~II ~:-



 ~
 I

 : I
 9
 ,._ STUDY 9
 ,._ I
 11




~I i
 -------'l~--"<---
 11
 11
 'I
 L i J____
 ~ = = ==;:=;::B::!:E::'.:DRG\'.JM::'.:~====;:;;:'.,J___ _ _ _ :I_, =J:~+-
 J ~ I: 1I
 I ~



 •
 ::::> <(




 1
 0:::E:
 u .




 b
 f----1-------<-
 f----1-------<-
 f----1-------lf--
 t:ii:3
 WW
 f--+------lf-- c:::-
 f----1-------<- '-e' 4'-10•____,._______,_e• -11•__,,__,,_2• " 1- u..
 31- ~ • _ , , __ _ _ _ _ 111-!0¾ 1 _ ATTIC FLOOR PLAN Ul C!)
 SCALE :1/4'•1'-0" w-z
 J 9 _ _ _ _,___ _ _ _ _ _ 15'-! 1 _ _ _ _ _ __,.,
 zC:::
 @ - DENOTES SMOKE DETECTOR - c..
 C.. Ul
 SECOND FLR PLAN ~ - DENOTES PHOTOELECTRIC Sl"'OKE DETECTOR
 Ul
 SCALE : 114'•1 1-0' @ - DENOTES BATHRM EXHAUST FAN w
 _ _ _ _ q1-e,• _ _ _ _,,__ _ _ __ _ 1s 1-1• _ _ _ _ _ _-----,Y
 @ - DENOTES SMOKE DETECTOR
 FIRST FLR PLAN ~.- DENOTES PHOTOELECTRIC SMOKE DETECTOR
 SCALE :1/4 •l'-0" @ - DENOTES BATHRM EXHAUST FAN
 @ - DENOTES SMOKE DETECTOR
 ~.- DENOTES PI-IOTOELECTRIC SMOKE DETECTOR
 @ - DENOTES BATHRM EXHAUST FAN

 PROPOSED
 BUILDING
 FLOOR PLANS
 11,· .r.o·
 MKS
 MKS

 '""""""°' 2025- 271



 A-3
 I· ~~


 DD

 00
 DD

FRONT ELEVATION RIGf.ff SIDE ELEVATION
 SCALE :11-4"•1'-0"
 "SCAN QR COOE FOR DGITAL FILE'




 Rev: Dat o: OeiscriptlOl'I: NAME

 01 2/13/2i FORAPPROV-'l MKS




 ~>-
 - w l-
 a::
 ~ V) :::> <(
 <l: V) 0:£
 u .
 u..- t:i :l
 1 0:: WW
 0 0:: a:: -LL
 I-


 ~~
 lf) (!)
 w-
 z
 z a::
 -a.. a..
 ;:~
 w-
 lf)
 w
 lf)




 z'

 BLDG ELEVATIONS
 FLOOR PLANS

 ~ 1/4' • 1'- 0'
 MKS
 CH('!).,. MKS
 l'ft0.8'T.., 2025- 271


 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
 ' • '-
 REAR ELEVATION
 SCALE , 1/-4' •1'-0'
 A-1
 p:: )> . ,
 ~ 70 70
 ITl(') O
 z. I.Z:
 ~ -1-I
 . rn
 nrn
 -1::;:;
..,.,,,. C<
 70 )>
 J> -1
 ,- 0
 ;oz:
 rn
 z:
 t.::J
 rn
 70
 z:
 0




 0
 NEW TWO-FAMILY g Consulting Engineers
 .z
 ~; .
 !Jr! 0
 < 278 Washington Street
 ig
 m JIM MORRISSEY
 ;o I Weymouth, MA 02188
 l/l Phone: (781) 331-5898
 ::c i
 m .,"~ www.WAM-Engineers.com
 Walter A. McKinnon Associates, Inc.
 ti ~ ES PINE STREET COURT
 z
 ~
 ~
 :- Consulting Engineers 0
 oll~1~1z
 111111 ~ SPRINGFIELD, MA ! !
 pu CD _..
 , ii ,,r NEW TWO-FAMILY ~ Consulting Engineers
 .z
 rC
 oG'> ~ 0
 278 Washington Street
 Ig
 om JIM MORRISSEY
 ;or ~ ~ Weymouth, MA 02188
 -um ~ Phone: (781) 331-5898
 m
 r< I
 ►~ www.WAM-Engineers.com C
 Walter A. McKinnon Associates, Inc.
ti ~ ~
 Zo
 Ulz
 Ul
 ES PINE STREET COURT
 2
 "~"
 ~
 ~ Consulting Engineers 0
 • ►
 ~! ! ~ SPRINGFIELD, MA >
 . •~
t
 tr-
f
 Generated from maps.springfield-ma.gov Copyright City of Springfield, Massachusetts 2021




 ES Pine Street (09715-0135)

 3/3/2026 4:23:50 PM
 Scale: 1"=100'
 Scale is approximate
GIS information is provided on these Web Pages as a public resource for general information purposes only. It is used to locate, identify
and inventory parcels of land in the City of Springfield for general purposes only and is NOT to be construed or used as a "legal
description." Map and parcel information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. No portion of the information should
be considered to be, or used as, a legal document. The information is provided subject to the express condition that the user knowingly
waives any and all claims for damages against the City of Springfield that may arise from the use of this data. Information provided on
these Web Pages should be verified with the appropriate City department, and reviewed and approved by an attorney or other qualified
professional prior to its use for any purpose with potential legal consequences.
097170020 097150136 097150060
CLARK DONALD A TR DONES ROGELIO OCASIO IRREVOCABLE
42 GRANT AVE 223 PINE ST 238 PINE ST
BROCKTON, MA 02301 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


097150061 097170003 097170005
PUERTO RICAN VETERANS REYES ENELIDA REYES ENELIDA
185 MILL ST 30 CLAYTON ST 30 CLAYTON ST
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01108 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01107 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01107


097150135 097150131
SPRINGFIELD CITY OF SPRINGFIELD HOUSING
36 COURT ST 25 SAAB CT
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01104
 $5>prfngfftlb J}f1,torfcal
 <tommf~1,fon 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 0/ 104
 (413) 787-6020 (office)
 (413) 787-6524 (fax)



 APPLICATION CHECKLIST
I
PROPERTY ADDRESS: I fif I"\<,~ $beet
Incomplete application will NOT be accepted and scheduled. A complete and valid application MUST contain the following information:
 I) The type of Certificate the petitioner is seeking must be indicated (see Page I);
 2) The property owner's signature must appear on the application;
 3) Relevant and applicable PHOTOGRAPHS, MATERIALS and PLANS specified on the Application

 CHECKLIST

 ~ APPLICATION

 Please complete the attached application and PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PAGES IF NEEDED.

 1✓1 PICTURES OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
 Please provide color photographs of the project area's current condition. For example, should the project
 pertain to replacing windows, provide a photograph of what the current windows looks like.
 □- RENDERING OF PROPOSED PROJECT UPON COMPLETION
 Please provide a rendering of what the project will look like upon completion. For some products, such as
 siding, windows, doors, solar powered panels, HVAC systems (including heat pumps), this may include prod-
 uct details from the manufacturer and/or store or a brochure. For paint color-related projects, a sample of
 the color may suffice. For new construction, renderings from an architect are required.

 E] PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
 Please provide specifications for any products (e.g. doors, windows, siding, solar powered panels, HVAC sys-
 tems, etc.) to be utilized during the project. Project details from the manufacturer and/or store, or a bro-
 chure, will suffice. If available please bring physical samples qfthe pmduct. tQ the meeting date.
 ~~ LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
 If.the landowner is unable to attend the hearing, correspondence shall be submitted that authorizes a repre-
 sentative to speak on their behalf about the application.

 -
For more information visit the City's website· www SJ',2ringfield - ma govlJ;ilanning/historic comm or call the Office· (413) 787 - 6020
 ' '

 OFFICE USE ONLY

LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT: ~ DECISION:
 t :J~<)~J
 .
DATE RECEIVED: DECISION DATE:
 MorC,hb")'JJfJ.f,
HEARING DATE: DATE DISCUSSED (No HEARING):
 A~a ~ , ~ b
DATE NOTICE POSTED: WAIVED BY COMMISSION:
 M~ \l-1~<p;J.l
DATE NOTICE MAILED: WAIVED BY ABUTTERS:
 t\~rd.- lr) ~~

Last Updated 0 I /30/2025
 S5)pringfftlb 1!,f~torftal
 <!Commi~~fon 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 01104
 (413) 787-6020 (office)
 (413) 787-6524 (fax)



 APPLICATION TYPE
I
PROPERTY ADDRESS:

 APPLICATION TYPE. (Select Application Type)
 0 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

 Select this type of application for those changes that are in conformance with the guidelines and/or accepta-
 ble for the particular Local Historic District.

 □ CERTIFICATE OF HARDSHIP

 Select this type of application for those changes that are not appropriate with the underlying District guide-
 lines, but which are necessary due to economic, physical, social, or other special conditions that apply to the
 individual property, but do not apply to the overall underlying District.

 □ CERTIFICATE OF NON-APPLICABILITY
 Select this type of application for those changes that affect features not controlled by the Commission (e.g.
 work that involves no change in materials, design or dimensions).

 □ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (I.E. REVIEW OF A STRUCURE IN A NATIONAL REGISTER DISTRICT/INDIVIDUAL BUILDING)

 Select this type of application for those changes that affect a structure in a National Register District, or a
 structure that is listed as a National Register Individual Building, that utilizes public funding (local, State, or
 federal). If the structure is both within a National Register District/Individual Building and a Local Historic
 District, select one of the application types above (Appropriateness, Hardship, Non-Applicability). If the
 structure contains a Preservation Restriction and is located within a National Register District/Individual
 Building, select the Preservation Agreement application type below.

 □ PRESERVATION AGREEMENT

 Selection this type of application if the structure contains a Preservation Restriction.

 □ PRESERVATION OF HISTORICALLY SIGNIFCANT BUILDINGS (DEMO DELAY)

 Select this type of application if the structure is more than 75 years old and are requesting that the nine (9)
 month demo delay restriction be lifted in order to commence demolition immediately.

 □ MUNICIPAL PROTOCOL
 Select this type of application if the structure relates to a municipally (City of Springfield) owned property,
 and the project will be facilitated by the municipality (City of Springfield).

 □ SECTION I 06 REVIEW

 Select this type of application if the project is being submitted in accordance with Section I 06.


Recourse: If a petitioner disagrees with a ruling by the Commission, he or she may, within twenty (20) days after filing the notice of such ruling
with the City Clerk, appeal to the Superior Court or Housing Court, if applicable. On the other hand, the Historical Commission may, through
Superior Court (or Housing Court), seek an injunction against any violation with a historic district's guidelines/standards. The Court may order
the removal of any such violation, or the restoration of any building or feature altered or demolition in violation of a historic district's standards.
Persons found guilty of any violations may be fined not less than ten dollars ($10.00) or no more than five hundred dollars ($500.00)

Last Updated O1/30/2025 Page I
 ~prfngfftlb J,i~torftal
 <!Commf~~fon 70 Tapley Street
 Springfield, MA 0/ 104
 (413) 787-6020 (office)
 (413) 787-6524 (fax)



 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE
 PROPERTY ADDRESS:
 CHECK Box IF THE

 PROPERTY OWNER:
 PETITIONER REQUIRES
 AN INTERPRETER
 □
 ~ )'ER ADDRESS:
 W'Check box if same as property address MfJ 0102
 REPRESENTATIVE/CONTRACTOR NAME:



 OWNER EMAIL ADDRESS: REPRESENTATIVE/CONTRACTOR PHONE NUMBER:

 - €) f> • ,tsIt!)
 PROPERTY CODE: REPRESENTATIVE/CONTRACTOR EMAIL ADDRESS:



 PROJECT DESCRIPTION (USE SEPARATE PAGE IF NEEDED): PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS


  a~ fovnr ~ 1 ~d. _ B
 (Please check all that apply)

 Windows (see Page 3)

  ?<J 0 JD"beiLcl Uf LJ,J?7,{ Lfti(f ~ D Doors (see Page 4)
 Ad fl& Wlfldn,u}, 01 bull~ ~ □ Siding (see Page 5)

 vt4b I.a, .Lv97ii jbml &{ad Jb,m D Roofing (see Page 6)
 □ Solar (see Page 6)
 ~~ .
 □ Signs (see Page 7)

 D Heat Pumps (see page 7)

 □ Paint (see Page 8)

 □ Renovations (e.g. Porches) (see
 Page 8)

 D New Construction (all of the above)

 D Other Projects (see Page 9):

D Check box if property owner will be in att ndance at the hearing. If not, correspondence from the property owner authorizing a representative
 to present the application is required.




 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE DATE

 Lost Updated O1/30/2025 Page 2
 WINDOWS

□ Check box indicating that you are submitting an order sheet with renderings/brochure of the proposed windows.
0' Check box indicating that you are submitting photographs of the existing windows.


□ Check box indicating that you are aware of the City's Window Guidelines (click here).
Will the Dimensions of the Windows Change: □Yes (Please Provide Details Below Under Additional Information) □No
PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ABOUT THE CONDITIONS OF THE CURRENT WINDOWS:

 Ctvfr5➔ o/JJ ~ v-/2fflr¼'Lvd ~~ ch_a~cl fa V~e:>
 f/zsu)~ ~ lJVJ7JJLeJtv W&0 607o&_a/ Uf k~Y- ~ ~
 pup& _~e , ~~  , J/!WJfl,; Clll)P~! rfa'(S)(j vlrfZ-(J f W2J>1ddi,i) --
/Vee_ d ~ pie~ ~ )L ~ (µund&,,J -
PLEASE PROVIDE THE REASON FOR WANTING TO REPLACE THE WINDOWS: I


nJl5l7} ~U,t~ciw U'C½ ?5f!ffl&Lf2 d wz;/d. ~ ) µrndvW ~ i . / 4
 /to ~tu ~
NUMBER OF WINDOWS TO BE REPLACED/ADDED:
 1 ..
NEW WINDOW MANUFACTURER:
 l,(;)dd, /J2/4.1.d~

MODEL NUMBER(S):


 .,



 EXISTING PROPOSED

MATERIAL (e.g. wood, vinyl, aluminum, etc):
 v~ vuxL
EXTERNAL COLOR(S) (e.g. black, white, etc):
 IA~h ~
GRID PLACEMENT (Interior or Exterior): •
 '
 ~ f l b A Pn ~~L,., ~ ~ ~(
 le...,--.:{
GRID PATTERN (e.g. two-aver-two; six-over-one, etc):




WINDOW STYLE(S) (e.g. double-hung, etc): ~Ju4u LA-~ -- ,(~ .k!R_ ~
GLASS TYPE(S) (e.g. single-pane, double-pone, etc): ;)/1)~1&.. ;f2- ~ ~ o/__,,o~ £
ADDITIONAL INFOMRAT/ON:
 u




Last Updated O1/3012025 Page 3
·tu. ,
 ~ /J~cllkk?~
 C o ~ )




 80-JJecl oJZ_ ~~ g ~ / ¼ ~
Jlw n~  I b 1 /VIcttth S{ Sf+ a jYl~ 0 IIOs jrti»1 <='i
Ul'4e dctb ~ - t'f dJ'/ -:i/4e f t , v / ~ I p to ~~
 11&1 ;t/u,J ~'ZJZSfMj CW' wet( tv? ~ :/Ju ~
  fofJJU-f:zM Me JJe0} ou:ytP-ei //4mtz_ ~ f€fJ~·
 hrJ
  tJnc cg -;Li f)mf- ~~ w ~ bo-z>b._71 amo/ w °'----1
bo-r,th'! w11 p1J wood . h ~ ~ all 7t..L
tu?/f/clJws wwe_ vWlfjl tA0Y7c/duJ_s . JVJ? ~1(;
 jo q~Ll}_cl 1w rfanr-l lti2ffldfe_; vJ17L v ~ ,
 { tui~ d
 / ~ ¾e a4-u toV ~ Gkrn bLad _
 6LJyYL()_
 ~ ~

~d,1us 70 /LQe_c( ~C4_ ~ · /-f7Jv/f_
doWfJ cdl /ltJ- . v~G l<Rndtiw ·_
As Q !:>~ · &«~()~~cit frLQ lo ~
Cm11 lt at'.' ee ef1 ~ t&11c;0kS. _
 l 1eJZ1 o/P1';;:l ~ 6 Fc&,,,e--e_ C?1CY! ~

 bDldp
 ~J>J~
 J/4/~?/b.
 I



 \ f
\, I I
 \
 Generated from maps.springfield-ma.gov Copyright City of Springfield, Massachusetts 2021




 167 Maple Street GIS Map

 3/9/2026 12:18:35 PM
 Scale: 1"=125'
 Scale is approximate
GIS information is provided on these Web Pages as a public resource for general information purposes only. It is used to locate, identify
and inventory parcels of land in the City of Springfield for general purposes only and is NOT to be construed or used as a "legal
description." Map and parcel information is believed to be accurate but accuracy is not guaranteed. No portion of the information should
be considered to be, or used as, a legal document. The information is provided subject to the express condition that the user knowingly
waives any and all claims for damages against the City of Springfield that may arise from the use of this data. Information provided on
these Web Pages should be verified with the appropriate City department, and reviewed and approved by an attorney or other qualified
professional prior to its use for any purpose with potential legal consequences.
082180246 082180237 082180241
413 MULTI SERVICE REALTY A&R REAL ESTATE GROUP CANGI-FIVE PROPERTIES LLC
155 MAPLE ST UNIT 401 155 MAPLE STREET UNIT-409 155 MAPLE ST UNIT 305
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180223 082180222 082180225
CLIONSKY MITCHELL CLIONSKY MITCHELL I CLIONSKY MITCHELL I
155 MAPLE ST UNIT 203 155 MAPLE ST STE 203 155 MAPLE ST UNIT 203
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180228 082180166 082180218
CLIONSKY MITCHELL I DAD RAHIM FIRST ZYMURGY INC
155 MAPLE ST UNIT 203 11 CHESTER ST 155 MAPLE ST UNIT 110
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180232 082180258 082180231
GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP
155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180242 082180244 082180256
GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP
155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180260 082180238 082180239
GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP GATEWAY REALTY GROUP
155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST STE 301
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180240 082180216 082180214
GATEWAY REALTY GROUP HMB INVESTMENTS LLC HMB INVESTMENTS LLC
155 MAPLE ST STE 301 155 MAPLE ST SUITE 105 155 MAPLE ST - UNIT 105
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


008500029 082180220 082180047
IQRA FARM LLC L&D REAL ESTATE LLC MAPLE STREET HOLDINGS
14699 B&R RD 32 ELAINE CIR 1009 W BOSTON POST RD
GREENWOOD, DE 19950 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01109 MAMARONECK, NY 10543


082180050 082180051 082180052
MAPLE STREET ROWHOUSES MAPLE STREET ROWHOUSES MAPLE STREET ROWHOUSES
P.O. BOX 30384 P.O. BOX 30384 P.O. BOX 30384
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103


082180053 082180230 082180212
MAPLE STREET ROWHOUSES MERCIER VARGO MICHELLE MORISI MARK G & MARTIN O
P.O. BOX 30384 84 MOUNTAIN VIEW RD 155 MAPLE ST
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SOMERS, CT 06071 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105
082180210 082180248 082180250
QURESHE HOLDINGS LLC RGR DEVELOPMENT AND RGR DEVELOPMENT AND
30 LENNYS WAY 68 WOLLASTON ST 68 WOLLASTON ST
WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA 01089 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01119 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01119


082180252 082180254 082180048
RGR DEVELOPMENT AND SLEPCHUK PETER SPRINGFIELD CITY OF
68 WOLLASTON ST 155 MAPLE ST 36 COURT ST
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01119 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103


082180049 082180165 082180226
SPRINGFIELD CITY OF SPRINGFIELD CITY OF WESTERN MASS HOME
36 COURT ST 36 COURT ST 155 MAPLE ST UNIT 204
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01103 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105


082180234
WESTERN MASS HOME
155 MAPLE ST UNIT 204
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01105