City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-04-08
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Friday, April 8, 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL
 CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT HERB J. WESSON, JR., Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District

PUBLIC COMMENT
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, and due to concerns over Covid-19, the City Council will take all public comment by
teleconference.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 1
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CABLE TELEVISION CHANNEL 35 AND ON THE INTERNET
AT: HTTPS://CLERK.LACITY.ORG/CALENDAR. LIVE COUNCIL MEETINGS CAN ALSO BE HEARD AT: (213) 621-
CITY (METRO), (818) 904-9450 (VALLEY), (310) 471-CITY (WESTSIDE) AND (310) 547-CITY (SAN PEDRO AREA)

Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID
No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting,
press *9 to request to speak.

Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information located on page 2 of this agenda.

Telecommunication Relay Services

Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements
in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of
hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.

Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.

What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.

Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This
is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider,
to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.

For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.

SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO
MUNICIPAL




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 2
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council
meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are
available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring
Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item
not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting
of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called
"special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council
agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested
to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda.
The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these
items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted
on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items
for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple
Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to
one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20
minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited
to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council
shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms
with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized
by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 3
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance
requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City
law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq.
More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213)
978-1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized
by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance
requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote
for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member
of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or
where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the
prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the
next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number,
Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require
an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter,
or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting
for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action.
A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to
forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote
for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member
of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or
where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the
prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the
next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number,




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 4
Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require
an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter,
or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting
for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action.
A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to
forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it
having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during
a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 5
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Friday, April 8, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 22-0288
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Innovation and
 Performance Commission (IPC) Innovation Fund (IF) funding for Ready Your
 LA Neighborhood (RYLAN) Pilot Project from the Emergency Management
 Department (EMD).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. ESTABLISH and APPROPRIATE a new appropriation account entitled
 EMD - RYLAN in the amount of $175,000 within the IF Fund No. 105/10
 from the available cash balance of the IF.

 2. TRANSFER $175,000 from the IF Fund No. 105/10, account entitled
 EMD - RYLAN to Fund No. 100/35 as follows:
 Fund Account Title Amount
 100/35 003040 Contractual Services $175,000

 3. INSTRUCT the EMD to:
 a. Separately track all encumbrances and expenditures of IF monies
 so that unspent funds can be returned to the IF at the end of the
 fiscal year.

 b. Report to the IPC with an accounting of the funds, the lessons
 learned, and any obstacles faced.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 6
 c. Report to the IPC if, after the receipt of funds, the scope of the
 funded item differs from the scope approved for funding by the
 Mayor and the Council.

 d. As appropriate, include acknowledgment of the IPC on public
 materials, such as press releases or websites that reference the
 RYLAN project.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to make technical
 corrections as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of these
 recommendations will allocate $175,000 of the remaining $826,112 IF
 2021-22 available balance. The $175,000 will be transferred to the EMD to
 begin implementation of the pilot project that has been approved by the IPC.
 In some cases, departments will incur ongoing costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies as IF
 monies are being utilized for an eligible project which will improve the quality,
 efficiency and effectiveness of City service through innovation, productivity,
 and performance measurement.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(2) 22-0309
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Innovation and
 Performance Commission (IPC) Innovation Fund (IF) funding for the L.A.
 Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform Project from the Controller.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. ESTABLISH and APPROPRIATE a new appropriation account entitled
 Controller’s Office – L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform in
 the amount of $160,000 within the IF Fund No. 105/10 from the available
 cash balance of the IF.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 7
 2. TRANSFER $160,000 from the IF Fund No. 105/10, account entitled
 Controller’s Office – L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform to
 Fund No. 100/26 as follows:
 Fund Account Title Amount
 100/26 003040 Contractual Services $70,000
 100/26 001070 Salaries, As-Needed 90,000
 Total: $160,000

 3. INSTRUCT the Controller to:
 a. Separately track all encumbrances and expenditures of IF monies
 so that unspent funds can be returned to the IF at the end of the
 fiscal year.

 b. Report to the IPC with an accounting of the funds, the lessons
 learned, and any obstacles faced.

 c. Report to the IPC if, after the receipt of funds, the scope of the
 funded item differs from the scope approved for funding by the
 Mayor and the Council.

 d. As appropriate, include acknowledgment of the IPC on public
 materials, such as press releases or websites, that reference the
 L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to make technical
 corrections as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of these
 recommendations will allocate $160,000 of the remaining $826,112 IF
 2021-22 available balance. The $160,000 will be transferred to the Controller
 to begin implementation of the pilot project that has been approved by the
 IPC. In some cases, departments will incur ongoing costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies as IF
 monies are being utilized for an eligible project which will improve the quality,
 efficiency and effectiveness of City service through innovation, productivity,
 and performance measurement.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 8
(3) 22-0197
 CD 7 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the
 intersection at Herrick Avenue and Vaughn Street as "The Crouch Family
 Square".

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez –
 Harris-Dawson):

 1. DESIGNATE the intersection at Herrick Avenue and Vaughn Street
 as “The Crouch Family Square”.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 permanent ceremonial sign(s) to this effect at this location.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(4) 20-0641
 CD 11 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to renaming Pisani
 Place from Venice Boulevard to Amoroso Court to "Orson Bean Way" using
 the private driveway naming process.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Bonin - Harris-
 Dawson):

 1. DIRECT the City Engineer to rename Pisani Place from Venice
 Boulevard to Amoroso Court to "Orson Bean Way" using the private
 driveway naming process.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 appropriate sign(s) to this effect at this location.

 3. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to waive any fees associated with
 this action.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(5) 22-0243
 CD 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the
 intersection at Berendo Street and Pico Boulevard as "Bert Corona
 Square".

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Cedillo - De
 Leon):

 1. DESIGNATE the intersection at Berendo Street and Pico Boulevard
 as "Bert Corona Square".

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 permanent ceremonial sign(s) to this effect at this location.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(6) 22-0062
 CD 11 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 22-0062-S1

 CONSIDERATION OF and ACTIONS RELATED TO THE MOUNT SAINT
 MARY’S UNIVERSITY CHALON CAMPUS (CAMPUS) WELLNESS
 PAVILION PROJECT (PROJECT) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
 (EIR), RELATED AND PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS,
 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
 MONITORING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT EIR, and
 RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
 FINDINGS; COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES CITY
 PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPEALS filed by 1) Brentwood
 Homeowners Association (Representative: Kathleen Flanagan, Board




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 10
 President of Brentwood Homeowners Association); 2) Douglas P.
 Carstens, on behalf of Brentwood Residents Coalition, Brentwood Alliance
 of Canyons and Hillsides, and Residential Neighbors of Mount Saint Mary’s
 University; 3) Bundy Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T. Hall,
 Channel Law Group, LLP; 4) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and
 Richard Bergman, Victor Antola, and Mary and David Vena
 (Representative: Neill E. Brower, Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler and Mitchell,
 LLP); and 5) Timothy D. Reuben and Stephanie I. Blum, Reuben Raucher
 and Blum; from the determination of the LACPC in finding that the LACPC
 has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, No.
 ENV-2016-2319-EIR (SCH No. 2016081015), dated April 2018, and the
 Final EIR, dated June 2021 (collectively, Project EIR), as well as the whole
 of the administrative record; certifying that the Project EIR has been
 completed in compliance with the CEQA, the Project EIR was presented to
 the LACPC as a decision-making body of the lead agency, and the Project
 EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency;
 adopting the related and prepared Project Environmental Findings,
 Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the MMP prepared for the
 Project EIR; approving a Plan Approval to allow for the development of
 Alternative 5 in conjunction with the continued use of a private school in the
 RE40-1-H Zone, pursuant to Section 12.24 M of the Los Angeles Municipal
 Code (LAMC); and, approving, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 F, a
 determination to permit a building height of 42 feet for the Wellness
 Pavilion, in lieu of the maximum height of 30 feet otherwise permitted by
 LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(d); for the Project (Alternative 5) involving the
 demolition of two tennis courts, an outdoor pool area, one Facilities
 Management building, the Fitness Center building, and several surface
 parking lots on a 3.8-acre portion of the 45-acre Campus, and
 the development of a 35,500 square-foot two-story Wellness Pavilion, a
 new outdoor pool area, Campus roadway improvements, new landscaped
 areas, and several surface parking lots totaling 186 vehicle spaces; the
 Wellness Pavilion will provide students, faculty, and staff with a gym, multi-
 purpose rooms, physical therapy lab, dance and cycling studios, lockers,
 showers, restrooms, and an equipment storage area; the Project does not
 include a request to increase student enrollment but will require the
 addition of one new staff person, and will introduce three new types of
 events which can be attended by outside guests, students, faculty, and/or
 staff; the Project's new events will include: (1) Summer Sports Camps
 (which will operate over a 12-week period during the summer); (2) Health
 and Wellness Speaker Series (a maximum of eight annual events); and,
 (3) other Wellness/Sports Events/Activities (a maximum of 12 events per
 year); two existing events, Athenian Day and Homecoming, currently held
 at the Campus, will be moved to the Wellness Pavilion to allow for potential




Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 11
 attendance increases, and Club Sports, but not intercollegiate sports, will
 be permitted; the Project will include a maximum building height of 42 feet;
 for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road, subject to Conditions of
 Approval.

 Applicant: Debra Martin, Mount Saint Mary’s University
 Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP
 Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015
 Related Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund
 impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on the above hyperlink or go to http://www.lacouncilfile.com
 for background documents.)

(7) 22-0062-S1
 CD 11 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 22-0062

 CONSIDERATION OF and ACTIONS RELATED TO THE MOUNT SAINT
 MARY’S UNIVERSITY CHALON CAMPUS (CAMPUS) WELLNESS
 PAVILION PROJECT (PROJECT) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
 (EIR), RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
 (CEQA) FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES, SECTIONS
 15162 AND 15164; COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES CITY
 PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPEALS filed by 1) Bundy
 Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T. Hall, Channel Law Group,
 LLP; and 2) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and Richard Bergman,
 Victor Antola, and Mary and David Vena (Representative: Neill E. Brower,
 Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler and Mitchell, LLP); from the determination of
 the LACPC in finding that the Project was assessed in the previously
 certified Wellness Pavilion Project EIR, No. ENV-2016-2319-EIR, SCH No.
 2016081015; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and
 15164, no subsequent EIR, negative declaration, or addendum is required




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 12
 for approval of the Project, and approving a Zoning Administrator
 Determination, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal (LAMC) Section 12.24
 X.28, to permit a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading (cut and fill), in
 lieu of the maximum cut and fill amount of 6,600 cubic yards permitted by
 LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(f)(1); and, approving a Zoning Administrator
 Determination, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 X.26, to permit the
 following modification to the number and height of retaining walls at the
 development site: a) an allowance of 12 retaining walls per lot in lieu of the
 maximum limit of one retaining wall per lot otherwise permitted by LAMC
 Section 12.21 C.8; and, b) a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height
 from two feet to a maximum height of up to 17 feet, in lieu of the 12-foot
 height limit otherwise permitted by LAMC Section 12.21 C.8; for the Project
 (Alternative 5) that would require a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading
 (cut and fill) and a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height from two
 feet to a maximum height of up to 17 feet, in conjunction with development
 of the Wellness Pavilion; for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road,
 subject to Conditions of Approval.

 Applicant: Debra Martin, Mount Saint Mary’s University
 Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP
 Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015
 Related Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund
 impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on the above hyperlink or go to http://www.lacouncilfile.com
 for background documents.)


Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(8)




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 13
 Verbal presentation from Los Angeles Unified School District
 Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on the 100 Day Plan and other related
 matters.




Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the
Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 14

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Friday, April 8, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)

 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)

Roll Call

Members Present: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez,
O'Farrell, Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee, Raman
(5)

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 22-0288
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Innovation and
 Performance Commission (IPC) Innovation Fund (IF) funding for Ready Your
 LA Neighborhood (RYLAN) Pilot Project from the Emergency Management
 Department (EMD).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. ESTABLISH and APPROPRIATE a new appropriation account entitled
 EMD - RYLAN in the amount of $175,000 within the IF Fund No. 105/10
 from the available cash balance of the IF.

 2. TRANSFER $175,000 from the IF Fund No. 105/10, account entitled
 EMD - RYLAN to Fund No. 100/35 as follows:
 Fund Account Title Amount
 100/35 003040 Contractual Services $175,000




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 1
 3. INSTRUCT the EMD to:
 a. Separately track all encumbrances and expenditures of IF monies
 so that unspent funds can be returned to the IF at the end of the
 fiscal year.

 b. Report to the IPC with an accounting of the funds, the lessons
 learned, and any obstacles faced.

 c. Report to the IPC if, after the receipt of funds, the scope of the
 funded item differs from the scope approved for funding by the
 Mayor and the Council.

 d. As appropriate, include acknowledgment of the IPC on public
 materials, such as press releases or websites that reference the
 RYLAN project.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to make technical
 corrections as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of these
 recommendations will allocate $175,000 of the remaining $826,112 IF
 2021-22 available balance. The $175,000 will be transferred to the EMD to
 begin implementation of the pilot project that has been approved by the IPC.
 In some cases, departments will incur ongoing costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies as IF
 monies are being utilized for an eligible project which will improve the quality,
 efficiency and effectiveness of City service through innovation, productivity,
 and performance measurement.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(2) 22-0309




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 2
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Innovation and
 Performance Commission (IPC) Innovation Fund (IF) funding for the L.A.
 Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform Project from the Controller.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. ESTABLISH and APPROPRIATE a new appropriation account entitled
 Controller’s Office – L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform in
 the amount of $160,000 within the IF Fund No. 105/10 from the available
 cash balance of the IF.

 2. TRANSFER $160,000 from the IF Fund No. 105/10, account entitled
 Controller’s Office – L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform to
 Fund No. 100/26 as follows:
 Fund Account Title Amount
 100/26 003040 Contractual Services $70,000
 100/26 001070 Salaries, As-Needed 90,000
 Total: $160,000

 3. INSTRUCT the Controller to:
 a. Separately track all encumbrances and expenditures of IF monies
 so that unspent funds can be returned to the IF at the end of the
 fiscal year.

 b. Report to the IPC with an accounting of the funds, the lessons
 learned, and any obstacles faced.

 c. Report to the IPC if, after the receipt of funds, the scope of the
 funded item differs from the scope approved for funding by the
 Mayor and the Council.

 d. As appropriate, include acknowledgment of the IPC on public
 materials, such as press releases or websites, that reference the
 L.A. Extractive Fines and Fees Digital Platform.

 4. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to make technical
 corrections as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of these
 recommendations will allocate $160,000 of the remaining $826,112 IF
 2021-22 available balance. The $160,000 will be transferred to the Controller




Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 3
 to begin implementation of the pilot project that has been approved by the
 IPC. In some cases, departments will incur ongoing costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies as IF
 monies are being utilized for an eligible project which will improve the quality,
 efficiency and effectiveness of City service through innovation, productivity,
 and performance measurement.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(3) 22-0197
 CD 7 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the
 intersection at Herrick Avenue and Vaughn Street as "The Crouch Family
 Square".

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez –
 Harris-Dawson):

 1. DESIGNATE the intersection at Herrick Avenue and Vaughn Street
 as “The Crouch Family Square”.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 permanent ceremonial sign(s) to this effect at this location.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 4
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(4) 20-0641
 CD 11 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to renaming Pisani
 Place from Venice Boulevard to Amoroso Court to "Orson Bean Way" using
 the private driveway naming process.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Bonin - Harris-
 Dawson):

 1. DIRECT the City Engineer to rename Pisani Place from Venice
 Boulevard to Amoroso Court to "Orson Bean Way" using the private
 driveway naming process.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 appropriate sign(s) to this effect at this location.

 3. DIRECT the Bureau of Engineering to waive any fees associated with
 this action.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(5) 22-0243
 CD 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to designating the
 intersection at Berendo Street and Pico Boulevard as "Bert Corona
 Square".

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Cedillo - De
 Leon):




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 5
 1. DESIGNATE the intersection at Berendo Street and Pico Boulevard
 as "Bert Corona Square".

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect
 permanent ceremonial sign(s) to this effect at this location.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(6) 22-0062
 CD 11 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 22-0062-S1

 CONSIDERATION OF and ACTIONS RELATED TO THE MOUNT SAINT
 MARY’S UNIVERSITY CHALON CAMPUS (CAMPUS) WELLNESS
 PAVILION PROJECT (PROJECT) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
 (EIR), RELATED AND PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS,
 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
 MONITORING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT EIR, and
 RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
 FINDINGS; COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES CITY
 PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPEALS filed by 1) Brentwood
 Homeowners Association (Representative: Kathleen Flanagan, Board
 President of Brentwood Homeowners Association); 2) Douglas P.
 Carstens, on behalf of Brentwood Residents Coalition, Brentwood Alliance
 of Canyons and Hillsides, and Residential Neighbors of Mount Saint Mary’s
 University; 3) Bundy Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T. Hall,
 Channel Law Group, LLP; 4) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and
 Richard Bergman, Victor Antola, and Mary and David Vena
 (Representative: Neill E. Brower, Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler and Mitchell,
 LLP); and 5) Timothy D. Reuben and Stephanie I. Blum, Reuben Raucher
 and Blum; from the determination of the LACPC in finding that the LACPC
 has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR, No.




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 6
 ENV-2016-2319-EIR (SCH No. 2016081015), dated April 2018, and the
 Final EIR, dated June 2021 (collectively, Project EIR), as well as the whole
 of the administrative record; certifying that the Project EIR has been
 completed in compliance with the CEQA, the Project EIR was presented to
 the LACPC as a decision-making body of the lead agency, and the Project
 EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency;
 adopting the related and prepared Project Environmental Findings,
 Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the MMP prepared for the
 Project EIR; approving a Plan Approval to allow for the development of
 Alternative 5 in conjunction with the continued use of a private school in the
 RE40-1-H Zone, pursuant to Section 12.24 M of the Los Angeles Municipal
 Code (LAMC); and, approving, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 F, a
 determination to permit a building height of 42 feet for the Wellness
 Pavilion, in lieu of the maximum height of 30 feet otherwise permitted by
 LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(d); for the Project (Alternative 5) involving the
 demolition of two tennis courts, an outdoor pool area, one Facilities
 Management building, the Fitness Center building, and several surface
 parking lots on a 3.8-acre portion of the 45-acre Campus, and
 the development of a 35,500 square-foot two-story Wellness Pavilion, a
 new outdoor pool area, Campus roadway improvements, new landscaped
 areas, and several surface parking lots totaling 186 vehicle spaces; the
 Wellness Pavilion will provide students, faculty, and staff with a gym, multi-
 purpose rooms, physical therapy lab, dance and cycling studios, lockers,
 showers, restrooms, and an equipment storage area; the Project does not
 include a request to increase student enrollment but will require the
 addition of one new staff person, and will introduce three new types of
 events which can be attended by outside guests, students, faculty, and/or
 staff; the Project's new events will include: (1) Summer Sports Camps
 (which will operate over a 12-week period during the summer); (2) Health
 and Wellness Speaker Series (a maximum of eight annual events); and,
 (3) other Wellness/Sports Events/Activities (a maximum of 12 events per
 year); two existing events, Athenian Day and Homecoming, currently held
 at the Campus, will be moved to the Wellness Pavilion to allow for potential
 attendance increases, and Club Sports, but not intercollegiate sports, will
 be permitted; the Project will include a maximum building height of 42 feet;
 for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road, subject to Conditions of
 Approval.

 Applicant: Debra Martin, Mount Saint Mary’s University
 Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP
 Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A




Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 7
 Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015
 Related Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund
 impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on the above hyperlink or go to http://www.lacouncilfile.com
 for background documents.)

 Adopted Item - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)

(7) 22-0062-S1
 CD 11 RELATED TO COUNCIL FILE NO. 22-0062

 CONSIDERATION OF and ACTIONS RELATED TO THE MOUNT SAINT
 MARY’S UNIVERSITY CHALON CAMPUS (CAMPUS) WELLNESS
 PAVILION PROJECT (PROJECT) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
 (EIR), RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
 (CEQA) FINDINGS PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES, SECTIONS
 15162 AND 15164; COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES CITY
 PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPEALS filed by 1) Bundy
 Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T. Hall, Channel Law Group,
 LLP; and 2) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and Richard Bergman,
 Victor Antola, and Mary and David Vena (Representative: Neill E. Brower,
 Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler and Mitchell, LLP); from the determination of
 the LACPC in finding that the Project was assessed in the previously
 certified Wellness Pavilion Project EIR, No. ENV-2016-2319-EIR, SCH No.
 2016081015; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and
 15164, no subsequent EIR, negative declaration, or addendum is required
 for approval of the Project, and approving a Zoning Administrator
 Determination, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal (LAMC) Section 12.24
 X.28, to permit a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading (cut and fill), in
 lieu of the maximum cut and fill amount of 6,600 cubic yards permitted by




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 8
 LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(f)(1); and, approving a Zoning Administrator
 Determination, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 X.26, to permit the
 following modification to the number and height of retaining walls at the
 development site: a) an allowance of 12 retaining walls per lot in lieu of the
 maximum limit of one retaining wall per lot otherwise permitted by LAMC
 Section 12.21 C.8; and, b) a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height
 from two feet to a maximum height of up to 17 feet, in lieu of the 12-foot
 height limit otherwise permitted by LAMC Section 12.21 C.8; for the Project
 (Alternative 5) that would require a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading
 (cut and fill) and a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height from two
 feet to a maximum height of up to 17 feet, in conjunction with development
 of the Wellness Pavilion; for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road,
 subject to Conditions of Approval.

 Applicant: Debra Martin, Mount Saint Mary’s University
 Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP
 Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015
 Related Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund
 impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on the above hyperlink or go to http://www.lacouncilfile.com
 for background documents.)

 Adopted Item - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, de León, Harris-Dawson, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez, Wesson, Jr. (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee,
 Raman (5)


Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(8)




 Friday - April 8, 2022 - PAGE 9
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Buscaino Blumenfield Police Officer III Lance
 Nielsen
Rodriguez Price Fawn Weaver
Rodriguez Martinez Angel City Football Club
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Martinez All Councilmembers Michael O’ Gara
 File No. 22-0062

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), RELATED AND PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS, STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM (MMP), and RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS;
and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to appeals filed
for a Plan Approval and Conditional Use for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road.

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

1. FIND, that the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) has reviewed and considered the
 information contained in the EIR No. ENV-2016-2319-EIR (SCH No. 2016081015) dated April 2018,
 and the Final EIR, dated June 2021 [collectively, Mount Saint Mary’s University (MSMU) Chalon
 Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR], as well as the whole of the administrative record.

2. CERTIFY the following:

 a. The MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR has been completed in compliance with
 CEQA.

 b. The MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR was presented to the LACPC as a
 decision-making body of the lead agency and the City Council on an appeal of the EIR.

 c. The MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR reflects the independent judgment and
 analysis of the lead agency.

3. ADOPT the following:

 a. The related and prepared MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project Environmental
 Findings.

 b. The Statement of Overriding Considerations.

 c. The MMP prepared for the MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR.

4. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the LACPC as the Findings of Council.

5. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by 1) Brentwood Homeowners Association (Representative:
 Kathleen Flanagan, Board President of Brentwood Homeowners Association); 2) Douglas P. Carstens,
 on behalf of Brentwood Residents Coalition, Brentwood Alliance of Canyons and Hillsides, and
 Residential Neighbors of MSMU; 3) Bundy Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T. Hall,
 Channel Law Group, LLP; 4) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and Richard Bergman, Victor
 Antola, and Mary and David Vena (Representative: Neill E. Brower, Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler and
 Mitchell, LLP); and 5) Timothy D. Reuben and Stephanie I. Blum, Reuben Raucher and Blum; and
 THEREBY SUSTAIN the LACPC’s determination in approving a Plan Approval to allow for the
 development of Alternative 5 in conjunction with the continued use of a private school in the RE40-1-
 H Zone, pursuant to Section 12.24 M of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC); and, approving,
 pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 F, a determination for a Conditional Use to permit a building height
 of 42 feet for the Wellness Pavilion, in lieu of the maximum height of 30 feet otherwise permitted by
 LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(d); for the Project (Alternative 5) involving the demolition of two tennis
 courts, an outdoor pool area, one Facilities Management building, the Fitness Center building, and
 several surface parking lots on a 3.8-acre portion of the 45-acre Campus, and the development of a
 35,500 square-foot two-story Wellness Pavilion, a new outdoor pool area, Campus roadway
 improvements, new landscaped areas, and several surface parking lots totaling 186 vehicle spaces;
 the Wellness Pavilion will provide students, faculty, and staff with a gym, multipurpose rooms, physical
 therapy lab, dance and cycling studios, lockers, showers, restrooms, and an equipment storage area;
 the Project does not include a request to increase student enrollment but will require the addition of
 one new staff person, and will introduce three new types of events which can be attended by outside
 guests, students, faculty, and/or staff; the Project's new events will include: (1) Summer Sports Camps
 (which will operate over a 12-week period during the summer); (2) Health and Wellness Speaker Series
 (a maximum of eight annual events); and, (3) other Wellness/Sports Events/Activities (a maximum of
 12 events per year); two existing events, Athenian Day and Homecoming, currently held at the
 Campus, will be moved to the Wellness Pavilion to allow for potential attendance increases, and Club
 Sports, but not intercollegiate sports, will be permitted; the Project will include a maximum building
 height of 42 feet; for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road, subject to Conditions of Approval as
 modified by the PLUM Committee on April 5, 2022, to include the following:

 a. Concurrent with the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Wellness Pavilion, MSMU shall
 limit average weekday daily Campus vehicle trips, inclusive of trips generated by the Wellness
 Pavilion, to the 2018 trip counts taken for the Campus, a 21 percent reduction below the 2016
 baseline trip counts (2,291 trips reduced to 1,813 trips) and shall limit average weekday am-pm
 peak hour trips to three percent below the 2018 trip counts taken for the Campus, a 27 percent
 reduction below the 2016 baseline trip counts (672 a.m. – p.m. peak hour trips reduced to 490 a.m.
 – p.m. peak hour trips) for five years. Overall trip reductions shall be confirmed through trip counts
 conducted for at least two weeks each year (two in the spring semester and two in the fall semester)
 to the satisfaction of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation.

 b. MSMU shall annually review its Wildfire Emergency Response Plan with the Los Angeles Fire
 Department (LAFD) for concurrence, and incorporate any new input from LAFD as appropriate.
 MSMU shall also provide an After Action Report to LAFD and Council District 11 following any
 wildfire event impacting the campus.

Applicant: Debra Martin, MSMU

Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP

Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A

Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015

Related Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs
are recovered through fees.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

Summary:
At a regular meeting held on April 5, 2022, the PLUM Committee considered a report from the LACPC and
appeals filed for a Conditional Use and Plan Approval for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road.
Department of City Planning staff provided an overview of the matter. Councilmember Bonin provided
comments in support of denying the appeals, and requested to include additional Conditions of Approval,
as detailed above. After an opportunity for public comment, and presentations from the Appellants,
Appellants’ Representatives, and the Applicant’s Representative; the Committee recommended to deny
the appeals and thereby sustain the LACPC’s determination in certifying the EIR; adopting the related and
prepared MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project Environmental Findings, the Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the MMP prepared for the MSMU Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion
Project EIR; and, approving the Plan Approval and Conditional Use for the Project, subject to Conditions
of Approval as amended to include the additional Conditions of Approval. This matter is now submitted to
Council for consideration.
Respectfully Submitted,

PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE




 MEMBER VOTE
 HARRIS-DAWSON: YES
 CEDILLO: YES
 BLUMENFIELD: YES
 LEE: ABSENT
 RODRIGUEZ: YES


CR
22-0062_rpt_PLUM_04-05-22
CD 11


 -NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL COUNCIL ACTS-
 File No. 22-0062-S1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE
REPORT relative to appeals filed on the Zoning Administrator’s determination for the property located at
12001 Chalon Road.

Recommendations for Council action:

1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision-maker, after consideration of the whole of
 the administrative record, the Project was assessed in the previously certified Mount Saint Mary’s
 University (MSMU) Chalon Campus Wellness Pavilion Project EIR, No. ENV-2016-2319-EIR, SCH No.
 2016081015; and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent EIR,
 negative declaration, or addendum is required for approval of the Project.

2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of
 Council.

3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by 1) Bundy Canyon Association (Representative: Jamie T.
 Hall, Channel Law Group, LLP; and 2) Bernadette and Tim Leiweke, Barbara and Richard Bergman,
 Victor Antola, and Mary and David Vena (Representative: Neill E. Brower, Esq., Jeffer Mangels Butler
 and Mitchell, LLP); and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in approving the Zoning
 Administrator Determination, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.24 X.28, to
 permit a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading (cut and fill), in lieu of the maximum cut and fill amount
 of 6,600 cubic yards permitted by LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(f)(1); and, approving a Zoning
 Administrator Determination, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.24 X.26, to permit the following modification
 to the number and height of retaining walls at the development site: a) an allowance of 12 retaining
 walls per lot in lieu of the maximum limit of one retaining wall per lot otherwise permitted by LAMC
 Section 12.21 C.8; and, b) a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height from two feet to a maximum
 height of up to 17 feet, in lieu of the 12-foot height limit otherwise permitted by LAMC Section 12.21
 C.8; for the Project (Alternative 5) that would require a total of 9,343 cubic yards of grading (cut and
 fill) and a total of 12 retaining walls ranging in height from two feet to a maximum height of up to 17
 feet, in conjunction with development of the Wellness Pavilion; for the property located at 12001 Chalon
 Road, subject to Conditions of Approval as modified by the PLUM Committee on April 5, 2022, to
 include the following:

 a. Concurrent with the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Wellness Pavilion, MSMU shall
 limit average weekday daily Campus vehicle trips, inclusive of trips generated by the Wellness
 Pavilion, to the 2018 trip counts taken for the Campus, a 21 percent reduction below the 2016
 baseline trip counts (2,291 trips reduced to 1,813 trips) and shall limit average weekday a.m. – p.m.
 peak hour trips to three percent below the 2018 trip counts taken for the Campus, a 27 percent
 reduction below the 2016 baseline trip counts (672 a.m. – p.m. peak hour trips reduced to 490 a.m.
 – p.m. peak hour trips) for five years. Overall trip reductions shall be confirmed through trip counts
 conducted for at least two weeks each year (two in the spring semester and two in the fall semester)
 to the satisfaction of the Los Angeles Department of Transportation.

 b. MSMU shall annually review its Wildfire Emergency Response Plan with the Los Angeles Fire
 Department (LAFD) for concurrence and incorporate any new input from LAFD as appropriate.
 MSMU shall also provide an After Action Report to LAFD and Council District 11 following any
 wildfire event impacting the campus.

Applicant: Debra Martin, MSMU

Representative: Victor De la Cruz, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP

Case No. ZA-2017-928-ZAD-1A
Environmental Nos. ENV-2016-2319-EIR; SCH No. 2016081015

Related Case No. CPC-1952-4072-CU-PA-1A

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs
are recovered through fees.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

Summary:
At a regular meeting held on April 5, 2022, the PLUM Committee considered a report from the LACPC and
appeals filed on the Zoning Administrator’s determination for the property located at 12001 Chalon Road.
Department of City Planning staff provided an overview of the matter. Councilmember Bonin provided
comments in support of denying the appeals, and requested to include additional Conditions of Approval,
as detailed above. After an opportunity for public comment, and presentations from the Appellants,
Appellants’ Representatives, and the Applicant’s Representative, the Committee recommended to deny
the appeals and thereby sustain the LACPC’s determination in approving the environmental clearance and
the Zoning Administrator’s determination for the Project, subject to Conditions of Approval as amended to
include the additional Conditions of Approval. This matter is now submitted to Council for consideration.


Respectfully Submitted,

PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE




 MEMBER VOTE
 HARRIS-DAWSON: YES
 CEDILLO: YES
 BLUMENFIELD: YES
 LEE: ABSENT
 RODRIGUEZ: YES


CR
22-0062-S1_rpt_PLUM_04-05-22
CD 11


 -NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL COUNCIL ACTS-
 TO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMENT ON NEXT #51
 MO
 - LAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTED

I MOVE that $725,000 in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100-56, Account No. 0000448
representing a portion of a Council District 7 allocation from the Reinvestment of LAPD Funds
for Impacted Communities (CF 20-0600-S83), be transferred I appropriated to the Board of
Public Works Fund No. 100-74, Account No. 3040 (Contractual Services) for the Los Angeles
Conservation Corps' youth sidewalk repair training program coordinated by the Office of
Community Beautification.

I FURTHER MOVE that the Board of Public Works, Office of Community Beautification be
instructed and authorized to prepare, process and execute the necessary contract amendments,
documents with and/or payments to, the Los Angeles Conservation Corps in the above amount,
for the above purposes, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.

I FURTHER MOVE that the Department of Public Works Office of Accounting be authorized
to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer
instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
 BUDGET & FINANCE

 MOTION


 The Twelfth Council District (CD 12) has received a request to donate one 1996 Lime
Seagrave Triple Engine to El Camino College's Fire Academy. On September 1, 2020 El Camino
College's fire facility burned down, destroying most of its donated equipment and an apparatus.
The Academy trains potential firefighters for South Bay Fire Departments, including the Los
Angeles City Fire Department. A donated fire apparatus would assist candidates in properly
training for a job in the fire service.

 Section 22.547 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code provides that upon Council
approval, surplus City equipment may be sold for less than market value to a non-profit
organization located in the City of Los Angeles, which has been established exclusively to
further the services provided by the City and its departments. El Camino College's Fire Academy
is located at 206 West Beach Avenue in the City oflnglewood. The donation ofthe Seagrave
Triple Engine would allow the Fire Academy to train the candidates to the highest standard and
prepare them to serve their communities. The total fair market value of the rig is $5,000, which
will be foregone revenue should it be donated.
I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council:
 1. Find that El Camino College's Fire Academy is eligible to purchase one 1996 Lime
Seagrave Triple Engine (VIN# 1F9EC28TXTCST2098) at below market value ($1.00) in
accordance with LAAC Sec. 22.547 (Donation of Surplus City Equipment), and

 2. Request the City Attorney to prepare a contract to effectuate the sale and transfer of the
above-identified surplus equipment at below market value to El Camino College Fire Academy
as expeditiously as possible; and

 3. Instruct the City Clerk to inform the Fire Academy [Chief Jeffrey Baumunk, Public
Safety Director, (310) 660-3593 x3256, 206 West Beach Avenue, Industry & Tech building,
Room 231, Inglewood, California 90302] that the surplus equipment must be claimed within 90
days from the date of Council approval ofthe request after which time it will revert to the City's
surplus equipment pool for disposal by the Department of General Services.




APR
 BUDGET & FINANCE
 11KI~ 1-'AR . .
 MOTION , K~. HEALTH. EDUCATION .
 , & NEIGHBORH()()t.;
 Preserving Women Reproductive Rights

Women in the United States have had to fight for decades to gain control over their own bodies
-a basic human right. Unfortunately, 49 years after the Roe v. Wade decision, which affirmed
an individual's right to decide whether or not to have an abortion, the fight continues and
women's rights are once again under attack. In December 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court heard
oral arguments in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Clinic, which centers on
Mississippi's 2018 "Gestational Age Act" prohibiting abortions after the fifteenth week, before
the fetus becomes viable. While we maintain hope that the Supreme Court will affirm the
decisions of the lower courts, we must prepare for the stark possibility that Roe v. Wade may be
overturned, allowing states to fully ban or restrict abortion access.

Thankfully, the Governor and California legislators stand in support of the Roe v. Wade decision
and have declared California open to out-of-state individuals seeking access to abortion. As one
of the major cities in the state, Los Angeles is likely to see an inflow of patients. According to a
report by Planned Parenthood, "people in over half of the states in the country -over 36 million
women and other people who may become pregnant- will lose access to abortion care."
Projections by the Guttmacher Institute indicate that California is likely to see an increase of
46,000 to 1.4 million women of reproductive age (15-49) whose nearest provider would be in
California- that is about a 3,000% increase. As a City that has often led this country towards
progressive values, the City must prepare to be a refuge for people seeking abortions. For many
people, terminating a pregnancy can be a lifeline preventing them from living in poverty or
becoming homeless. But no matter the reasons or circumstances, all people have a right to
privacy and should have a choice over their bodies.

I THEREFORE MOVE, that the City Attorney be requested to file an amicus brief in support of
the Jackson Women's Health Clinic's position and the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 5th Circuit in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Clinic; and

I FURTHER MOVE, that the City Council direct the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) to
coordinate the City's response with the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services
and Department of Public Health, and identify ways the City could respond to the possible
increase in demand, including at the City's transportation hubs (LAX, Union Station, etc).

 0
 Councilwoman, 61h District



SECONDED~:~ ~~~
 PUBLIC SAFETY
 MOTION

  Every year, the Los Angeles Police Department reports about 140,000 calls related to
  homelessness. Over the last two years, the Council has worked towards a model of crisis
  response that prioritizes mental health and trauma-informed care. Thus far, the City has created
  and invested funding in at least three programs to address crises that do not require armed
  intervention.

  Additionally, on March 18, 2022, the Council released an RFP for unarmed response. This
  program will serve as the long-term solution to comprehensively and holistically address
  emergency crisis response for the City of Los Angeles. The unarmed response program aims to
  implement a strategy that is modeled after the CAHOOTS mobile crisis response initiative in
  Eugene, Oregon.

  Per CF 20-0769-82 (O'Farrell- Martinez- Rodriguez- Cedillo), the Council requested a
  comprehensive review of the delivery of mental health services by the County of Los Angeles
  and all other service providers directly working with the City of Los Angeles. In order to develop
  a long-term program that serves the needs of Los Angeles residents, the City must incorporate
  the lessons learned from the pilot programs that are currently operating in the City. The existing
  pilots were intended to be short term programs that would assist in the city's development of a
  permanent crisis response program.

  I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Administrative Officer (GAO), City Legislative Analyst (CLA),
  and any other relevant departments, report back on all existing City unarmed crisis response
  programs. The report should include; but not be limited to:

 • Budget and scope of work for the current programs;
 • Model of services provided and target population; and
 • Metrics and data on outcomes for all existing programming.
 0




APR o 8 2022
 MOTION PLANNiNG &LAND USE MANAGEMENT
 On August 12,2020 the Council adopted a Motion (Blumenfield-Ryu-Krekorian, et al.), instructing
 the Planning Department, the Department of Building and Safety, and the Bureau of Street Services, to
 prepare a report and recommendations relative to ongoing tree and biodiversity planning, strategies and/or
 efforts to protect and grow the City's urban canopy (CF 15-0499-Sl).

 The role and benefits of urban forests are widely known. From shade provision to cleaner air,
 ecological habitat, rainwater collection, extreme heat mitigation, energy efficiency, beautification,
 improved mental health, and more - trees are the foundational natural resource that provide our urban
 communities with endless environmental, public health and quality of life benefits.

 The shortage of trees is illustrated by the very low tree canopy coverage percentages in all 15
 Council Districts. As noted in the Los Angeles Urban Forest Equity Streets Guidebook prepared in April
 2021 by CAPA Strategies, the following chart provides the tree canopy coverage distribution by each
 Council District, with very low percentages Citywide, as follows:

 Council District Tree Canopy Coverage Percentage
 15 10.03%
 9 11.71%
 8 12.20%
 10 15.46%
 6 15.68%
 14 15.80%
 13 18.56%
 1 20.36%
 12 20.59%
 2 24.99%
 7 25.16%
 3 25.61%
 5 35.20%
 11 36.43%
 4 36.66%

 Trees are not being effectively protected or prioritized in policy, development, or enforcement.
 Instead, neighborhoods in every Council District are systematically deprived of the very natural resources
 that are the path to a sustainable built environment and enduring community health. This proves especially
 true for low-income communities, which already face a vast array of environmental inequities including
 increased exposure to adverse environmental conditions and their resulting negative health outcomes.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council instruct the Planning Department, the Department of
 Building and Safety, the Bureau of Street Services, the City's Community Forest Advisory Committee, and.
 the Board of Public Works Forest Office, with the assistance of the City Attorney, to: (1) prepare a report
 with recommendations relative to ongoing tree and biodiversity planning, strategies and/or efforts to protect
 and grow the City's urban canopy, as instructed by the Council on August 12, 2020 (CF 15-0499-S1);·and
 (2} provide recommendations to require the placement of trees, and timing of any tree removals, at an ear ·
 i#P""""""iiiillllo.
 phase in the land use/environmental review, and permitting review process, and thereby maximize
 efforts to grow tree canopy covera e; and (3) prepare and present an ordinance to effectuate these direct_· -- ·- -


 PRESENTED BY: ~-._.-l
 ML\RQUEECE~SDA~~~­
 Councilmember, 8th District

 rrm


APR 0 8 2022
 RULES, ELECTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATION
 RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules,
regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal governmental body
or agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with the
concurrence of the Mayor; and

WHEREAS, bridges are a critical component of the City's public transportation infrastructure,
ensuring that communities are connected and residents have access to all comers of the City; and

WHEREAS, the federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which was signed into law in
November 2021, will provide nearly a trillion dollars in infrastructure funding over the next five
years including funding dedicated for urgent and necessary work on bridges; and

WHEREAS, currently pending before the State Assembly is a bill, AB 2120 (Ward), which would
require the State to allocate a portion of the funding the State receives under the federal
infrastructure bill to repairing and replacing locally-owned bridges; and

WHEREAS, the State currently budgets approximately $300 million annually in funding to local
bridges, despite reporting showing that at least $800 million in funding is necessary to maintain
the current inventory of locally-owned bridges in the State; and

WHEREAS, AB 2120 would apply the same funding formula for bridge-dedicated funds the State
receives under the federal infrastructure bill that was used for the past federal Highway Bridge
Replacement and Rehabilitation Program, which allocated 55 percent of the federal funds to
locally-managed projects; and

WHEREAS, AB 2120 would also require that the State continue providing a portion of federal
National Highway Performance Program funds and federal Surface Transportation Block Grant
Program funds for local bridge repair and replacement projects; and

WHEREAS, under AB 2120, annual funding for local bridges programmed by the State would
increase by $500 million to approximately $800 million per year over the next five years;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the
adoption of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State
Legislative Program SUPPORT for AB 2120 (Ward), which will guarantee that a portion of the
bridge-dedicated funding programmed for the State in the bipartisan federal infrastructure bill will
be directed to repairing and replacing locally-owned bridges.




 J
 ouncilmember, 141h District




 SECONDEDBY:f i ? ~__.._ - ~
 -
 R E so Lv T1o ~ ~ULES, ELECTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIO',
"'HEREAS~ any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislatio11: rules,
regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal goYemmental body or
agency must first han· been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council v>"ith the
concurrence of the Mayor; and

"'HEREAS, as the world is facing eYer-worsening climacte disasters, like the recent heatwa,-e thact killed
up to 500 people in the Northwest u_s. and British Columbia and the massiYe floods in Australia and
e1sev.-here, the City DfLos Angeles continues to proYide strong international leadership to reduce
greenhouse gas emissiDns in time to keep the climate safe and the plmet habitable and thriYing; and

"'HEREAS, the Los Angeles Department of \\·7ater and Power has been leading the ·w ay nationally
with its LAlOO effort, an effort whose success depends upon achie\·ing full electrification across city
sectors as soon as possible; and

"'HEREAS, in Los Angeles buildings account for 43~· 'o of climate emissions- more than any other
sector, and bDth Mayor Garcetti and the City Council haye prioritized policies to require building
decarbonization; and

"'HEREAS, methane leakage fi:om the gas distribution system and gas appliances, and C02 and KOx
emissions from gas appliances and heating systems are major sources of greenhouse gas emissions; and

"'HEREAS, the gas distribution system, gas appliances, and gas heating s-ystems contribute to heart
and lung disease by releasing NUx and particulate matter that lingers in homes~ buildings, and
neighborhoods; and

"'HEREAS: the Climate Equity LA series run by the City's Climate Emergency r..·fobilization Oftice is
dedicated to drilling down into and ele...-ating enYironmental justice and labor priorities ,,-ithin the
decarbonization policies; and

\''HEREAS, many cities across the State have taken aggfessive steps to reduce emissions from the
building sectors by adopting all-electric building ..reach codes" for ne\\· construction; and

""HEREAS, Senate Billl393 (Archuleta·Rodriguez) ·would inhibit the state's progress on building
decarbonization by putting undue and burdensome standards on cities seeking to adopt requirements to
replace dangerous and polluting fossil-fueled applianc·es 1.\'.itb zero-emission,. electric appliances; and

'VHEREAS, the California Energy Commission already has responsibility to re\·iew and approYe local
adoption Df energy standards pro...-ided that local standards are cost e:ffectiYe and that the standards will
require buildings to be designed to consume no more energy than permitted by the California Energy
Code; and

"'HEREAS, SB 1393 would require a host of additional f111dings that undennine local control and
place an undue burden on local jurisdictions that are exercising their rights to safeguard constituents
fi·om the hanns of fossil fuels, from air pollution that harms people's health, and from \Yildfires that
threaten their li,-es, properties and liYelihoods~ and
"'HEREAS, local governments should be incenti\·ized rather than disincenti\·ized to adopt strong
reach codes to better protect the health and safety of their communities~ and

\'\'HEREAS~ the utter failure of international and national leadership to meaningfully :reduce
greenhouse gas emissions has put people all over the world at great .risk, including Angelenos, many
of whom \\·ork and reside in frontline communities already bearing the brunt of climate impacts like
extreme heat and lw1g-damaging ozone pollution~ and

"'HEREAS, leadership on climate emissions reductions has thereby fallen upon cities and their
utilities~ and

"'HEREAS, the City ofLos Angeles and other cities must continue to be able to move nimbly on
climate emissions reductions work within their jurisdiction and halt any attempt to inhibit or otherw1se
slow their efforts.

~0\V, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLYED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the adoption of
this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State Legislati.-e Program
OPPOSITIO:\ to SB 1393 (Archuleta:Rodriguez), ·which will dangerous'ly inhibit the City's ability to
meet its building decarbonization targets in time to protect against severe dimate disruption and
continuing climate disasters.




PRESENTED BY:




 PAUL KREKORIA..I\f
 Councilmember, 2nd District Councilmemher, 13th District




 SECOJ\TDED BY: