City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-10-12
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Wednesday, October 12, 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
 Wednesday
purpose. Proof of a - October
 negative test requires a printed 12,email,
 document, 2022or- text message displayed on a PAGE 1 from a test
 phone
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be
submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.


Telecommunication Relay Services


Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.


Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.


What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.


Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.


For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 2
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.


The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.


PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.


The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.


If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 3
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 4
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­0278
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to modernizing the City’s MyLA311 system.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. NOTE and FILE the September 14, 2022 Information Technology
 Agenda (ITA) report, inasmuch as this report is does not require
 Council action.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 5
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Wednesday, October 12, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­0278
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to modernizing the City’s MyLA311 system.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. NOTE and FILE the September 14, 2022 Information Technology
 Agenda (ITA) report, inasmuch as this report is does not require
 Council action.


 2. INSTRUCT the ITA to report in regard to the results of the Request
 for Proposals to modernize the City’s 311 system as described in
 the September 14, 2022 ITA report, attached to the Council File, and
 the proposed schedule for implementing said 311 system.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The ITA reports that its September 14, 2022
 report, attached to the Council File, is an informational report and has no
 fiscal impact to the General Fund. Additional funding requests for the
 project implementation will be submitted through the budget process.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(2) 22­0002­S51
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 6
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The ITA reports that its September 14, 2022
 report, attached to the Council File, is an informational report and has no
 fiscal impact to the General Fund. Additional funding requests for the
 project implementation will be submitted through the budget process.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(2) 22­0002­S51
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 2419 (Bryan, Garcia, Stone,
 Stern) which would require a minimum of 40 percent of funds received by
 the State under the Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act be
 allocated to projects that provide direct benefits to disadvantaged
 communities.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Martinez ­
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT IF AMENDED, for AB 2419
 (Bryan, Garcia, Stone, Stern), which would require a minimum of 40
 percent of funds received by the State under the Federal Infrastructure
 Investment and Jobs Act be allocated to projects that provide direct
 benefits to disadvantaged communities, and related matters, if amended
 to ensure that the most environmentally impacted communities, with
 CalEnviroscreen scores within the top 10 percent, are properly
 represented on the Justice40 Oversight Committee; and that investments
 made in these communities do not increase environmental justice
 challenges faced by the communities.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(3) 22­0002­S103
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1816 (Bryan) which would
 require the California Department of Housing and Community
 Development (HCD) to create the Reentry Housing and Workforce
 Development Program.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Bonin ­
 Harris­Dawson ­ Price), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 Wednesday - October 12,
 2022 State Legislative 2022 - SUPPORT for AB 1816
 Program, PAGE 7 which
 (Bryan),
 would require the the HCD to create the Reentry Housing and Workforce
 City's position regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1816 (Bryan) which would
 require the California Department of Housing and Community
 Development (HCD) to create the Reentry Housing and Workforce
 Development Program.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Bonin ­
 Harris­Dawson ­ Price), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1816 (Bryan), which
 would require the the HCD to create the Reentry Housing and Workforce
 Development Program and would require the HCD to provide grants to
 counties, community­based organizations, or continuums of care for
 innovative or evidence­based housing, housing­based services, and
 employment interventions; and, require the HCD to distribute allocated
 funds for a term of 5 years, subject to automatic renewal.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(4) 22­0002­S86
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Senate Bill (SB) 1327 (Hertzberg), which
 establishes privately­enforced civil causes of action against persons who
 manufacture or cause to be manufactured, distribute, transport, or import
 into the State, or cause to be distributed or transported or imported into the
 State, keep for sale or offer or expose for sale, or give or lend certain
 firearms.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Blumenfield
 – et al. – Martinez), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 1327 (Hertzberg),
 which establishes privately­enforced civil causes of action against
 persons who manufacture or cause to be manufactured, distribute,
 transport, or import into the State, or cause to be distributed or
 transported or imported into the State, keep for sale or offer or expose for
 sale, or give or lend certain firearms.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 Wednesday For: - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 8
 transport, or import into the State, or cause to be distributed or
 transported or imported into the State, keep for sale or offer or expose for
 sale, or give or lend certain firearms.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council



(5) 22­0002­S88
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1794 (Gipson), which would
 facilitate the execution of a post adoption sibling contact agreement.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Harris­
 Dawson ­ Bonin), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1794 (Gipson), which
 would facilitate the execution of a post adoption sibling contact agreement
 when parental rights are terminated and the court orders a dependent
 child to be placed for adoption; and would facilitate a petition to be made
 to the juvenile court to reinstate parental rights when an adoption is no
 longer a permanent plan.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative Analyst.
 The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of
 this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(6) 22­0002­S100
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Senate Bill (SB) 443 (Hertzberg), which would
 clarify the intent of SB 438 and ensure governing bodies of fire agencies
 can make policy decisions regarding their services based on their
 communities' needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 443 (Hertzberg),
 Wednesday which would -clarify
 Octoberthe12,
 intent of SB
 2022  - 438 and ensure governing
 PAGE 9bodies of
 fire agencies can make policy decisions regarding their services based
 City's position regarding Senate Bill (SB) 443 (Hertzberg), which would
 clarify the intent of SB 438 and ensure governing bodies of fire agencies
 can make policy decisions regarding their services based on their
 communities' needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 443 (Hertzberg),
 which would clarify the intent of SB 438 and ensure governing bodies of
 fire agencies can make policy decisions regarding their services based
 on their communities' needs.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(7) 22­0002­S101
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the
 City's position regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1740 (Muratsuchi), AB 2407
 (O’Donnell), and Senate Bill (SB) 1087 (Gonzalez), which would strengthen
 the laws governing the sale of used catalytic converters.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee ­
 Krekorian), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1740 (Muratsuchi),
 AB 2407 (O’Donnell), and SB 1087 (Gonzalez), which would strengthen
 the laws governing the sale of used catalytic converters, thereby assisting
 law enforcement in reducing thefts and discouraging the commission of
 the crime.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative Analyst.
 The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of
 this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Rampart Village Neighborhood Council
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Sunland – Tujunga Neighborhood Council



(8) 21­1472
 Wednesday RULES, - October 12,
 ELECTIONS, AND2022 -
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAGE 10
 RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, relative to options for a ballot measure for the
 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Rampart Village Neighborhood Council
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Sunland – Tujunga Neighborhood Council



(8) 21­1472
 RULES, ELECTIONS, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 COMMITTEE REPORT, relative to options for a ballot measure for the
 November 2022 ballot to amend the City Charter to create an Independent
 Redistricting Commission for the City, and related matters.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Raman –
 Krekorian ­ Martinez):
 INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with assistance from the
 City Attorney and other City departments, as needed, to report within 90
 days with options for a ballot measure to be prepared for an election in
 2024 to amend the City Charter to create an Independent Redistricting
 Commission for the City. The report should include, among other topics,
 the following:


 a. An analysis of the structure and performance of the independent
 redistricting commissions in place at the State of California, the
 County of Los Angeles, the County of San Diego, the City of Long
 Beach, the City of Berkeley, and any others that could serve as
 models to be replicated.


 b. Best practices for the selection of redistricting commissioners,
 including the possibility of a random/self­selection model wherein:
 (1) the applicant pool is vetted and whittled down by non­elected
 and/or non­partisan bodies (e.g., an ethics commission or a
 selection panel of retired judges or democracy experts) to a
 reasonable number of qualified applicants, (2) a certain number of
 qualified applicants are randomly selected to sit on the commission,
 and (3) the remainder of the commissioners are democratically
 selected by the randomly selected commissioners.


 c. The qualifications for commissioners, including the potential
 consideration of voter registration status, jurisdiction residency,
 analytical skills relevant to the redistricting process and voting rights,
 the ability to comprehend and apply the applicable State and
 Federal legal requirements, the ability to be impartial, and an
 appreciation for the diverse demographics and geography of the
 City.


 d. Conflicts of interest that would preclude participation on the
 redistricting commission, including the prohibition of individuals
 Wednesday who: - October
 have 12, for,
 worked  2022 -
 within a minimum timePAGE 11 prior to
 frame
 application, a locally elected politician or a local candidate's
 consideration of voter registration status, jurisdiction residency,
 analytical skills relevant to the redistricting process and voting rights,
 the ability to comprehend and apply the applicable State and
 Federal legal requirements, the ability to be impartial, and an
 appreciation for the diverse demographics and geography of the
 City.


 d. Conflicts of interest that would preclude participation on the
 redistricting commission, including the prohibition of individuals
 who: have worked for, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a locally elected politician or a local candidate's
 campaign; have contributed, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a certain dollar amount to a candidate for locally elected
 office; have been registered, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, as a lobbyist with the City, the County of Los Angeles,
 the State of California, or the Federal government; have been a local
 candidate or elected within a minimum time frame prior to
 application; have served as a member of any board or commission
 of the City; have been an employee, or performed services under
 contract with the City, including performing services as an employee
 of a contractor or subcontractor; have been an employee of any
 redistricting contractor or consultant; and/or are the spouse,
 domestic partner, child, parent, sibling or in­law of any person who
 fits any of the criteria above.


 e. Potential prohibitions on commissioners, for a specific period of
 time after appointment, becoming candidates for, or be appointed
 to, any elected office in the City, being compensated for lobbying the
 City Council, or receiving a non­competitively bid contract from the
 City.


 f. Best practices for the size, structure, and makeup of the
 commission to ensure a representative commission that reflects the
 great diversity of the City in terms of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic
 class, renter vs. homeowner status, age, gender, and geography,
 among any other relevant considerations.


 g. Best practices for the criteria that should guide the commission's
 map drawing process, including the ranked criteria model and the
 commissioners' potential consideration of compactness, contiguity,
 the unity of neighborhoods (including Neighborhood Councils) and
 communities of interest, existing district boundaries, minimization of
 voter deferral adherence to applicable State and Federal legal
 requirements, and other relevant considerations, including those
 enumerated in the California Fair Maps Act of 2019.


 h. Best practices for a fair numbering process for newly­drawn
 districts, including the possible adoption of an objective standard for
 new districts to be numbered corresponding to the existing district
 from which they draw the greatest population.
Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 12
 communities of interest, existing district boundaries, minimization of
 voter deferral adherence to applicable State and Federal legal
 requirements, and other relevant considerations, including those
 enumerated in the California Fair Maps Act of 2019.


 h. Best practices for a fair numbering process for newly­drawn
 districts, including the possible adoption of an objective standard for
 new districts to be numbered corresponding to the existing district
 from which they draw the greatest population.


 i. Best practices for the removal and replacement of commissioners,
 including the possible adoption of a for­cause standard for removal
 and the inclusion of additional non­voting commissioners to serve as
 alternates in the case of removal, resignation, or incapacitation of a
 commissioner.


 j. Best practices for the insulation of the redistricting commission from
 City elected officials and staff, including the banning of all
 commissioner communications with City elected officials and staff
 and the possibility of the redistricting commission having
 independent staff and an independent counsel.


 k. Best practices to ensure transparency and public participation,
 including the potential adoption of minimum requirements for access
 and participation, outreach, options to give verbal or written
 testimony, options to participate in­person or virtually, and access to
 mapping software with the ability to submit publicly drawn maps.


 l. An adequate and mandatory budget for the redistricting commission
 and potential safeguards to ensure City elected officials and staff
 cannot underfund the commission or forestall the release of
 commission funds.


 m. Best practices for commissioner compensation.


 n. Legal remedies for the challenging of adopted maps and options
 protocols to address maps deemed illegal by a court of law.


 o. Any other considerations to ensure that the commission fairly and
 adequately represents the residents of the City in the redistricting
 process.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 13
 For:
 o. Any other considerations to ensure that the commission fairly and
 adequately represents the residents of the City in the redistricting
 process.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 PICO Neighborhood Council
 Palms Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Studio City Neighborhood Council
 North Westwood Neighborhood Council
 For if amended:
 Mid City Neighborhood Council
 Reseda Neighborhood Council



(9) 18­1200­S6
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the appointment of Ms. Anna Menedjian to the South Valley Area
 Planning Commission (SVAPC).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Ms. Anna Menedjian to the
 SVAPC for the term ending June 30, 2023, is APPROVED and
 CONFIRMED. Ms. Menedjian currently resides in Council District 2.
 (Current composition: M = 1; F = 3; Vacant = 1)
 Financial Disclosure Statement: Filed
 Background Check: Pending


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 17, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 14, 2022)


(10) 22­1055
 CD 8 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE SOUTH LOS ANGELES AREA
 PLANNING COMMISSION (SLAAPC), and APPEALS filed by: 1) Felipe
 Caceres, USC Forward (Representative: Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., Law
 Office of Gideon Kracov), and 2) Tanisha B. Thomas, West Adams
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 14
 Neighborhood Association, from the decision of the SLAAPC in
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 14, 2022)


(10) 22­1055
 CD 8 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE SOUTH LOS ANGELES AREA
 PLANNING COMMISSION (SLAAPC), and APPEALS filed by: 1) Felipe
 Caceres, USC Forward (Representative: Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., Law
 Office of Gideon Kracov), and 2) Tanisha B. Thomas, West Adams
 Neighborhood Association, from the decision of the SLAAPC in
 determining that the Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development) and City CEQA
 Guidelines Section 1, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions), and sustaining the
 determination of the Deputy Advisory Agency's approval of Vesting
 Tentative Tract Map No. 83081­SL­HCA to subdivide an existing pair of
 7,062­square­foot lots, totaling 14,142 square feet, into 10 new lots, for the
 construction, use, and maintenance of 10 small lot homes pursuant to Small
 Lot Subdivision Ordinance No. 176,354; all units will be four stories in
 height with a maximum height of 44 feet with two covered parking spaces
 per lot, the site is currently developed with one commercial storefront
 building, proposed to be demolished; for the property located at 1840 ­
 1848 West Adams Boulevard, subject to Conditions of Approval.

 Applicant: Donghou Li, Tripalink
 Case No.: VTT­83081­SL­HCA­2A
 Environmental No.: ENV­2020­3308­CE
 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)


 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 Against: Empowerment Congress North Area Neighborhood
 Development Council


 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 17, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 14, 2022)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(11) 22­4118­S10
 CD 15 RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO ­ LEE) relative to the designation of locations
 Wednesday in Council District 15 for
 - October  12,enforcement
 2022 - against sitting, PAGE
 lying, sleeping,
 15 or
 storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 14, 2022)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(11) 22­4118­S10
 CD 15 RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO ­ LEE) relative to the designation of locations
 in Council District 15 for enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or
 storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or otherwise
 obstructing the public right­of­way, as further detailed in Los Angeles
 Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate
 the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property,
 or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, up to the maximum
 period of time prescribed, and further detailed in the LAMC:

 a. 24000 South Western ­ Library
 b. 113000 Monitor Avenue ­ Park

 c. 1331 Eubank Avenue ­ Park
 d. 1125 North Watson Avenue and 1211 North Coil Avenue ­
 Park
 e. 1052 North Banning Boulevard ­ Park

 f. 918 North Sanford Avenue ­ Park
 g. 560 North Western Avenue ­ Park
 h. 1300 Dodson Avenue ­ Park

 i. Alameda Street North of East “O” Street and South to East
 Grant Street ­ Active Railway
 j. 415 North Gaffey Street ­ Park
 k. 840 West 149th Street ­ Park

 l. 22400 South Halldale ­ Park
 m. 807 Paseo Del Mar, San Pedro ­ Park
 n. 3720 Stephen M. White Drive, Cabrillo Beach ­ Park

 o. 1801 West Paseo Del Mar ­ Park
 p. 610 West Channel Street ­ Park
 q. 24901 Frampton Avenue ­ Park
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 16
 l. 22400 South Halldale ­ Park
 m. 807 Paseo Del Mar, San Pedro ­ Park
 n. 3720 Stephen M. White Drive, Cabrillo Beach ­ Park

 o. 1801 West Paseo Del Mar ­ Park
 p. 610 West Channel Street ­ Park
 q. 24901 Frampton Avenue ­ Park


 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City Department(s) with
 jurisdiction over the identified locations to post appropriate notices
 of the above prohibitions at these locations, and to begin
 enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period.



(12) 12­0458
 CD 14 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY
 ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO VACATE relative to vacating Mission
 Road from Jesse Street to approximately 125 feet southerly thereof and
 Jesse Street from approximately 45 feet westerly of Mission Road northerly
 of Jesse Street to its westerly terminus, VAC­E1401195 (Vacation).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of February 20, 2019, that the Vacation,
 pursuant to the City of Los Angeles Environmental Guidelines, is
 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(3) of the City of Los Angeles
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of February 20, 2019, that the Vacation
 is in substantial conformance with the General Plan pursuant to
 Section 556 of the Los Angeles City Charter.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION TO VACATE No. 21­
 1401195 for the Vacation.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(13) 22­1121
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 Wednesday - October 12,
 BOARD OF AIRPORT 2022 -
 COMMISSIONERS PAGEto17approving
 (Board) relative
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(13) 22­1121
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Second Amendment with LAZ Parking California, LLC, to extend the
 contract term and contract authority covering the Taxi and Ride App Pickup
 Lot at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5382 with LAZ
 Parking California, LLC, to extend the term through October 28,
 2024 and increase the contract authority by $4,550,000, for new
 total not to exceed $70,050,000, covering the Taxi and Ride App
 Pickup Lot (LAX­It) at LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27561, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Second Amendment to
 Contract DA­5382 with LAZ Parking California, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(14) 21­1266­S1
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 Wednesday BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS
 - October 12, 2022 - (Board) relative
 PAGEto18approving
 the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5318 with RS&H California, Inc.,
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(14) 21­1266­S1
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving
 the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5318 with RS&H California, Inc.,
 to increase the contract value, covering professional engineering and
 construction administration services in support of the Landside Access
 Modernization Program (LAMP) Roadways, Utilities, and Enabling
 Projects at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5318 with
 RS&H California, Inc., to increase the contract value by $450,000,
 for new total not to exceed $4,700,000, covering professional
 engineering and construction administration services in support of
 the LAMP Roadways, Utilities, and Enabling Projects at LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27557, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Second Amendment to
 Contract DA­5318 with RS&H California, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(15) 22­1120
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 19
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY
 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(15) 22­1120
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY
 ATTORNEY and BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board), and
 ORDINANCES FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to approving four
 Agreements and Grant of Utility Easements with Southern California Gas
 Company, Pacific Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T, XO
 Communications Services LLC, and Crown Castle Fiber LLC, covering
 operation and maintenance of existing underground utilities, as part of the
 Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP) at the Los Angeles
 International Airport (LAX).

 A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines, that it is
 within the scope of the certified LAMP Environmental Impact Report
 (State Clearinghouse No. 201521014), and that it does not include
 any changes to the project that would require further review under
 CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and
 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the four associated Agreements and Grant of Utility
 Easements with (i) Southern California Gas Company, (ii) Pacific
 Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T, (iii) XO Communications
 Services LLC, and (iv) Crown Castle Fiber LLC, covering operation
 and maintenance of existing underground utilities, as part of LAMP
 at LAX.


 3. MAKE appropriate findings and adopt ORDINANCES, to be
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant said four
 associated Agreements and Grant of Utility Easements.


 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27556, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said four Agreements & Grant of
 Utility Easements.


 ​​​​​​​B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
 Wednesday - October
 Recommendation for 12, 2022 -
 Council PAGE 20
 action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant said four
 associated Agreements and Grant of Utility Easements.


 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27556, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said four Agreements & Grant of
 Utility Easements.


 ​​​​​​​B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCES, dated
 October 4, 2022, authorizing the grant of non­exclusive utility easement to:
 Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern California Gas Company,
 Crown Castle Fiber LLC, and XO Communications Services LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The Board
 reports that there is no impact to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(16) 22­1119
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY
 ATTORNEY and BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board), and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to approving the
 Agreement and Grant of Utility Easement with Teleport Communications
 America, LLC, for relocated telecommunication infrastructure, as part of
 the Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP) at the Los Angeles
 International Airport (LAX).

 A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines, and is also
 within the scope of the certified LAMP Environmental Impact Report
 (State Clearinghouse No. 2015021014) and does not include any
 changes to the project that would require further review under CEQA
 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
 Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the Agreement and Grant of Utility Easement with
 Teleport Communications America, LLC, covering 5200­5212 Arbor
 Wednesday - October
 Vitae Street, 12, 2022 telecommunication
 for relocated  - PAGE 21 as part
 infrastructure,
 of the LAMP at LAX.
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines, and is also
 within the scope of the certified LAMP Environmental Impact Report
 (State Clearinghouse No. 2015021014) and does not include any
 changes to the project that would require further review under CEQA
 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
 Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the Agreement and Grant of Utility Easement with
 Teleport Communications America, LLC, covering 5200­5212 Arbor
 Vitae Street, for relocated telecommunication infrastructure, as part
 of the LAMP at LAX.


 3. MAKE appropriate findings and adopt an ORDINANCE, to be
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant a utility
 easement to Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27555, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Agreement and Grant of
 Utility Easement with Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated October
 4, 2022, authorizing the granting of a non­exclusive utility easement to
 Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The Board
 reports that there is no impact to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)


(17) 22­1116
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving a
 three­year Contract with Global Access Supply, Inc, covering maintenance
 of the Airfield Lighting Control Monitoring System at the Los Angeles
 International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 22
 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
(17) 22­1116
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board) relative to approving a
 three­year Contract with Global Access Supply, Inc, covering maintenance
 of the Airfield Lighting Control Monitoring System at the Los Angeles
 International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the three­year Contract with Global Access Supply, Inc,
 covering maintenance of the Airfield Lighting Control Monitoring
 System at LAX, for cost not to exceed $411,000.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 18, 2022, by
 Resolution No. 27565, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or
 designee, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said Contract
 with Global Access Supply, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)



Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Closed Session

(18) 22­1079
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Amirrasam Mirhadi v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 19STCV07975. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall accident that occurred on May 18, 2018 at 10535 Wilshire
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 23
 Boulevard.)
Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Closed Session

(18) 22­1079
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Amirrasam Mirhadi v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 19STCV07975. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall accident that occurred on May 18, 2018 at 10535 Wilshire
 Boulevard.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


(19) 22­1080
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Margaret Gottfried v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 22STCV14593. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall incident which occurred on May 4, 2022 at or near 20700 Wells
 Drive in the City of Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


(20) 22­1081
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Betty Schilling, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV14936. (This matter arises from
 an automobile v. pedestrian accident that occurred on May 17, 2019, at or
 near 8628 Balboa Bouelvard in Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


(21) 22­1082
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Daniel Turner v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States
 District Court Case No. CV18­03405­DDP­KSx. (This matter arises from
 an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on
 March 22, 2017, in Los Angeles, California.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


(22) 22­1083
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 Wednesday case entitled Frank Preciado
 - October v. City
 12, 2022 - of Los Angeles, LosPAGE
 Angeles
 24 Superior
 Court Case No. 19STCV12061. (This matter arises from a compliant of
 an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on
 March 22, 2017, in Los Angeles, California.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


 (22) 22­1083
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Frank Preciado v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior
 Court Case No. 19STCV12061. (This matter arises from a compliant of
 discrimination based on race and national origin, hostile work environment
 harassment, and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment &
 Housing Act against the City.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


 (23) 22­1084
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled David Williams v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 20STCV07606. (This matter arises from a
 bicycle accident that occurred on March 5, 2019 near 2581 South
 Sepulveda Boulevard in Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)


 (24) 22­0989
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Green Leaf Caregivers. (This case arises from a Business
 License Tax assessment for a taxpayer who approached the City to resolve
 the tax liability through the Settlement Bureau.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)



Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 25
Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000).




 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 26

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Wednesday, October 12, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)
 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)
Roll Call
Members Present: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, O'Farrell,
Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (10); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Martinez (5)



Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­0278
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND
 ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT relative to modernizing the
 City’s MyLA311 system.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. NOTE and FILE the September 14, 2022 Information Technology
 Agenda (ITA) report, inasmuch as this report is does not require
 Council action.


 2. INSTRUCT the ITA to report in regard to the results of the Request
 for Proposals to modernize the City’s 311 system as described in
 the September 14, 2022 ITA report, attached to the Council File, and
 the proposed schedule for implementing said 311 system.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The ITA reports that its September 14, 2022
 report, attached to the Council File, is an informational report and has no
 fiscal impact to the General Fund. Additional funding requests for the
 project implementation will be submitted through the budget process.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 1
 2. INSTRUCT the ITA to report in regard to the results of the Request
 for Proposals to modernize the City’s 311 system as described in
 the September 14, 2022 ITA report, attached to the Council File, and
 the proposed schedule for implementing said 311 system.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The ITA reports that its September 14, 2022
 report, attached to the Council File, is an informational report and has no
 fiscal impact to the General Fund. Additional funding requests for the
 project implementation will be submitted through the budget process.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(2) 22­0002­S51
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position
 regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 2419 (Bryan, Garcia, Stone, Stern) which
 would require a minimum of 40 percent of funds received by the State
 under the Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act be allocated to
 projects that provide direct benefits to disadvantaged communities.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Martinez ­
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT IF AMENDED, for AB 2419
 (Bryan, Garcia, Stone, Stern), which would require a minimum of 40
 percent of funds received by the State under the Federal Infrastructure
 Investment and Jobs Act be allocated to projects that provide direct
 benefits to disadvantaged communities, and related matters, if amended
 to ensure that the most environmentally impacted communities, with
 CalEnviroscreen scores within the top 10 percent, are properly
 represented on the Justice40 Oversight Committee; and that investments
 made in these communities do not increase environmental justice
 challenges faced by the communities.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(3) Wednesday
 22­0002­S103 - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 2
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(3) 22­0002­S103
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position regarding
 Assembly Bill (AB) 1816 (Bryan) which would require the California
 Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to create the
 Reentry Housing and Workforce Development Program.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Bonin ­
 Harris­Dawson ­ Price), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1816 (Bryan), which
 would require the the HCD to create the Reentry Housing and Workforce
 Development Program and would require the HCD to provide grants to
 counties, community­based organizations, or continuums of care for
 innovative or evidence­based housing, housing­based services, and
 employment interventions; and, require the HCD to distribute allocated
 funds for a term of 5 years, subject to automatic renewal.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(4) 22­0002­S86
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position regarding
 Senate Bill (SB) 1327 (Hertzberg), which establishes privately­enforced
 civil causes of action against persons who manufacture or cause to be
 manufactured, distribute, transport, or import into the State, or cause to be
 distributed or transported or imported into the State, keep for sale or offer
 or expose for sale, or give or lend certain firearms.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Blumenfield
 – et al. – Martinez), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 3
 MAYOR:
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position regarding
 Senate Bill (SB) 1327 (Hertzberg), which establishes privately­enforced
 civil causes of action against persons who manufacture or cause to be
 manufactured, distribute, transport, or import into the State, or cause to be
 distributed or transported or imported into the State, keep for sale or offer
 or expose for sale, or give or lend certain firearms.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Blumenfield
 – et al. – Martinez), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 1327 (Hertzberg),
 which establishes privately­enforced civil causes of action against
 persons who manufacture or cause to be manufactured, distribute,
 transport, or import into the State, or cause to be distributed or
 transported or imported into the State, keep for sale or offer or expose for
 sale, or give or lend certain firearms.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council


 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(5) 22­0002­S88
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position regarding
 Assembly Bill (AB) 1794 (Gipson), which would facilitate the execution of a
 post adoption sibling contact agreement.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Harris­
 Dawson ­ Bonin), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1794 (Gipson), which
 would facilitate the execution of a post adoption sibling contact agreement
 when parental rights are terminated and the court orders a dependent
 child to be placed for adoption; and would facilitate a petition to be made
 to the juvenile court to reinstate parental rights when an adoption is no
 longer a permanent plan.


 Wednesday Fiscal Impact- Statement:
 October 12,None
 2022submitted
 - PAGE 4 Analyst.
 by the Chief Legislative
 The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of
 Dawson ­ Bonin), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1794 (Gipson), which
 would facilitate the execution of a post adoption sibling contact agreement
 when parental rights are terminated and the court orders a dependent
 child to be placed for adoption; and would facilitate a petition to be made
 to the juvenile court to reinstate parental rights when an adoption is no
 longer a permanent plan.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative Analyst.
 The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of
 this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(6) 22­0002­S100
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position regarding Senate
 Bill (SB) 443 (Hertzberg), which would clarify the intent of SB 438 and
 ensure governing bodies of fire agencies can make policy decisions
 regarding their services based on their communities' needs.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 443 (Hertzberg),
 which would clarify the intent of SB 438 and ensure governing bodies of
 fire agencies can make policy decisions regarding their services based
 on their communities' needs.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(7) 22­0002­S101

 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 Wednesday R E S O L U T I-OOctober
 N r e l a12,
 tive2022
 t o -e s t a b l i s h i n g t h e CPAGE
 i t y ' s 5p o s i t i o n
 regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1740 (Muratsuchi), AB 2407 (O’Donnell), and
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(7) 22­0002­S101

 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position
 regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 1740 (Muratsuchi), AB 2407 (O’Donnell), and
 Senate Bill (SB) 1087 (Gonzalez), which would strengthen the laws
 governing the sale of used catalytic converters.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee ­
 Krekorian), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021­
 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for AB 1740 (Muratsuchi),
 AB 2407 (O’Donnell), and SB 1087 (Gonzalez), which would strengthen
 the laws governing the sale of used catalytic converters, thereby assisting
 law enforcement in reducing thefts and discouraging the commission of
 the crime.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Chief Legislative Analyst.
 The City Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of
 this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Rampart Village Neighborhood Council
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Sunland – Tujunga Neighborhood Council


 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(8) 21­1472
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, relative to
 options for a ballot measure for the November 2022 ballot to amend the
 City Charter to create an Independent Redistricting Commission for the
 City, and related matters.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Raman –
 Krekorian ­ Martinez):
 INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with assistance from the
 Wednesday City Attorney- and
 October
 other12, 2022
 City -
 departments, as needed, toPAGE
 report6within 90
(8) 21­1472
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RULES, ELECTIONS, AND
 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE REPORT, relative to
 options for a ballot measure for the November 2022 ballot to amend the
 City Charter to create an Independent Redistricting Commission for the
 City, and related matters.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Raman –
 Krekorian ­ Martinez):
 INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with assistance from the
 City Attorney and other City departments, as needed, to report within 90
 days with options for a ballot measure to be prepared for an election in
 2024 to amend the City Charter to create an Independent Redistricting
 Commission for the City. The report should include, among other topics,
 the following:


 a. An analysis of the structure and performance of the independent
 redistricting commissions in place at the State of California, the
 County of Los Angeles, the County of San Diego, the City of Long
 Beach, the City of Berkeley, and any others that could serve as
 models to be replicated.


 b. Best practices for the selection of redistricting commissioners,
 including the possibility of a random/self­selection model wherein:
 (1) the applicant pool is vetted and whittled down by non­elected
 and/or non­partisan bodies (e.g., an ethics commission or a
 selection panel of retired judges or democracy experts) to a
 reasonable number of qualified applicants, (2) a certain number of
 qualified applicants are randomly selected to sit on the commission,
 and (3) the remainder of the commissioners are democratically
 selected by the randomly selected commissioners.


 c. The qualifications for commissioners, including the potential
 consideration of voter registration status, jurisdiction residency,
 analytical skills relevant to the redistricting process and voting rights,
 the ability to comprehend and apply the applicable State and
 Federal legal requirements, the ability to be impartial, and an
 appreciation for the diverse demographics and geography of the
 City.


 d. Conflicts of interest that would preclude participation on the
 redistricting commission, including the prohibition of individuals
 who: have worked for, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a locally elected politician or a local candidate's
 campaign; have contributed, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a certain dollar amount to a candidate for locally elected
 office; have been registered, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, as a lobbyist with the City, the County of Los Angeles,
 the State of California, or the Federal government; have been a local
 candidate or elected within a minimum time frame prior to
 Wednesday - October
 application; have 12,  2022as- a member of any board
 served PAGE 7
 or commission
 of the City; have been an employee, or performed services under
 d. Conflicts of interest that would preclude participation on the
 redistricting commission, including the prohibition of individuals
 who: have worked for, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a locally elected politician or a local candidate's
 campaign; have contributed, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, a certain dollar amount to a candidate for locally elected
 office; have been registered, within a minimum time frame prior to
 application, as a lobbyist with the City, the County of Los Angeles,
 the State of California, or the Federal government; have been a local
 candidate or elected within a minimum time frame prior to
 application; have served as a member of any board or commission
 of the City; have been an employee, or performed services under
 contract with the City, including performing services as an employee
 of a contractor or subcontractor; have been an employee of any
 redistricting contractor or consultant; and/or are the spouse,
 domestic partner, child, parent, sibling or in­law of any person who
 fits any of the criteria above.


 e. Potential prohibitions on commissioners, for a specific period of
 time after appointment, becoming candidates for, or be appointed
 to, any elected office in the City, being compensated for lobbying the
 City Council, or receiving a non­competitively bid contract from the
 City.


 f. Best practices for the size, structure, and makeup of the
 commission to ensure a representative commission that reflects the
 great diversity of the City in terms of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic
 class, renter vs. homeowner status, age, gender, and geography,
 among any other relevant considerations.


 g. Best practices for the criteria that should guide the commission's
 map drawing process, including the ranked criteria model and the
 commissioners' potential consideration of compactness, contiguity,
 the unity of neighborhoods (including Neighborhood Councils) and
 communities of interest, existing district boundaries, minimization of
 voter deferral adherence to applicable State and Federal legal
 requirements, and other relevant considerations, including those
 enumerated in the California Fair Maps Act of 2019.


 h. Best practices for a fair numbering process for newly­drawn
 districts, including the possible adoption of an objective standard for
 new districts to be numbered corresponding to the existing district
 from which they draw the greatest population.


 i. Best practices for the removal and replacement of commissioners,
 including the possible adoption of a for­cause standard for removal
 and the inclusion of additional non­voting commissioners to serve as
 alternates in the case of removal, resignation, or incapacitation of a
 commissioner.

Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 8
 j. Best practices for the insulation of the redistricting commission from
 districts, including the possible adoption of an objective standard for
 new districts to be numbered corresponding to the existing district
 from which they draw the greatest population.


 i. Best practices for the removal and replacement of commissioners,
 including the possible adoption of a for­cause standard for removal
 and the inclusion of additional non­voting commissioners to serve as
 alternates in the case of removal, resignation, or incapacitation of a
 commissioner.


 j. Best practices for the insulation of the redistricting commission from
 City elected officials and staff, including the banning of all
 commissioner communications with City elected officials and staff
 and the possibility of the redistricting commission having
 independent staff and an independent counsel.


 k. Best practices to ensure transparency and public participation,
 including the potential adoption of minimum requirements for access
 and participation, outreach, options to give verbal or written
 testimony, options to participate in­person or virtually, and access to
 mapping software with the ability to submit publicly drawn maps.


 l. An adequate and mandatory budget for the redistricting commission
 and potential safeguards to ensure City elected officials and staff
 cannot underfund the commission or forestall the release of
 commission funds.


 m. Best practices for commissioner compensation.


 n. Legal remedies for the challenging of adopted maps and options
 protocols to address maps deemed illegal by a court of law.


 o. Any other considerations to ensure that the commission fairly and
 adequately represents the residents of the City in the redistricting
 process.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 PICO Neighborhood Council
 Palms Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Studio City Neighborhood Council
 North Westwood Neighborhood Council

Wednesday For if amended:
 - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Mid City Neighborhood Council
 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 PICO Neighborhood Council
 Palms Neighborhood Council
 Encino Neighborhood Council
 Studio City Neighborhood Council
 North Westwood Neighborhood Council
 For if amended:
 Mid City Neighborhood Council
 Reseda Neighborhood Council



 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(9) 18­1200­S6
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the appointment of Ms. Anna Menedjian to the South Valley Area
 Planning Commission (SVAPC).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Ms. Anna Menedjian to the
 SVAPC for the term ending June 30, 2023, is APPROVED and
 CONFIRMED. Ms. Menedjian currently resides in Council District 2.
 (Current composition: M = 1; F = 3; Vacant = 1)
 Financial Disclosure Statement: Filed
 Background Check: Pending


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 17, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(10) 22­1055
 CD 8 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE SOUTH LOS ANGELES AREA
 PLANNING COMMISSION (SLAAPC), and APPEALS filed by: 1) Felipe
 Caceres, USC Forward (Representative: Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., Law
 Office of Gideon Kracov), and 2) Tanisha B. Thomas, West Adams
 Neighborhood Association, from the decision of the SLAAPC in
 determining that the Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Wednesday Article 19, Section 15332,
 - October Class-32 (Infill Development)
 12, 2022 PAGEand10
 City CEQA
 Guidelines Section 1, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions), and sustaining the
 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(10) 22­1055
 CD 8 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALTIY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE SOUTH LOS ANGELES AREA
 PLANNING COMMISSION (SLAAPC), and APPEALS filed by: 1) Felipe
 Caceres, USC Forward (Representative: Jordan R. Sisson, Esq., Law
 Office of Gideon Kracov), and 2) Tanisha B. Thomas, West Adams
 Neighborhood Association, from the decision of the SLAAPC in
 determining that the Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development) and City CEQA
 Guidelines Section 1, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions), and sustaining the
 determination of the Deputy Advisory Agency's approval of Vesting
 Tentative Tract Map No. 83081­SL­HCA to subdivide an existing pair of
 7,062­square­foot lots, totaling 14,142 square feet, into 10 new lots, for the
 construction, use, and maintenance of 10 small lot homes pursuant to Small
 Lot Subdivision Ordinance No. 176,354; all units will be four stories in
 height with a maximum height of 44 feet with two covered parking spaces
 per lot, the site is currently developed with one commercial storefront
 building, proposed to be demolished; for the property located at 1840 ­
 1848 West Adams Boulevard, subject to Conditions of Approval.

 Applicant: Donghou Li, Tripalink
 Case No.: VTT­83081­SL­HCA­2A
 Environmental No.: ENV­2020­3308­CE
 (Planning and Land Use Management Committee report to be
 submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an
 opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)


 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 Against: Empowerment Congress North Area Neighborhood
 Development Council


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.


Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(11) 22­4118­S10
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO ­ LEE)
 relative to the designation of locations in Council District 15 for
 enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining,
 or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­
 way, as further detailed in Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section
 41.18.

 Recommendations for Council action:
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 11
(11) 22­4118­S10
 CD 15 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO ­ LEE)
 relative to the designation of locations in Council District 15 for
 enforcement against sitting, lying, sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining,
 or placing personal property, or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­
 way, as further detailed in Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section
 41.18.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate
 the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property,
 or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, up to the maximum
 period of time prescribed, and further detailed in the LAMC:

 a. 24000 South Western ­ Library
 b. 113000 Monitor Avenue ­ Park

 c. 1331 Eubank Avenue ­ Park
 d. 1125 North Watson Avenue and 1211 North Coil Avenue ­
 Park
 e. 1052 North Banning Boulevard ­ Park

 f. 918 North Sanford Avenue ­ Park
 g. 560 North Western Avenue ­ Park
 h. 1300 Dodson Avenue ­ Park

 i. Alameda Street North of East “O” Street and South to East
 Grant Street ­ Active Railway
 j. 415 North Gaffey Street ­ Park
 k. 840 West 149th Street ­ Park

 l. 22400 South Halldale ­ Park
 m. 807 Paseo Del Mar, San Pedro ­ Park
 n. 3720 Stephen M. White Drive, Cabrillo Beach ­ Park

 o. 1801 West Paseo Del Mar ­ Park
 p. 610 West Channel Street ­ Park
 q. 24901 Frampton Avenue ­ Park


 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City Department(s) with
 jurisdiction over the identified locations to post appropriate notices
 of the above prohibitions at these locations, and to begin
 enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 12
 o. 1801 West Paseo Del Mar ­ Park
 p. 610 West Channel Street ­ Park
 q. 24901 Frampton Avenue ­ Park


 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City Department(s) with
 jurisdiction over the identified locations to post appropriate notices
 of the above prohibitions at these locations, and to begin
 enforcement upon the expiration of any required posting period.


 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(12) 12­0458
 CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and RESOLUTION TO
 VACATE relative to vacating Mission Road from Jesse Street to
 approximately 125 feet southerly thereof and Jesse Street from
 approximately 45 feet westerly of Mission Road northerly of Jesse Street to
 its westerly terminus, VAC­E1401195 (Vacation).

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of February 20, 2019, that the Vacation,
 pursuant to the City of Los Angeles Environmental Guidelines, is
 exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(3) of the City of Los Angeles
 Environmental Guidelines.


 2. REAFFIRM the FINDINGS of February 20, 2019, that the Vacation
 is in substantial conformance with the General Plan pursuant to
 Section 556 of the Los Angeles City Charter.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION TO VACATE No. 21­
 1401195 for the Vacation.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 13
(13) 22­1121
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Engineer. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(13) 22­1121
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS
 (Board) relative to approving the Second Amendment with LAZ Parking
 California, LLC, to extend the contract term and contract authority covering
 the Taxi and Ride App Pickup Lot at the Los Angeles International Airport
 (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5382 with LAZ
 Parking California, LLC, to extend the term through October 28,
 2024 and increase the contract authority by $4,550,000, for new
 total not to exceed $70,050,000, covering the Taxi and Ride App
 Pickup Lot (LAX­It) at LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27561, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Second Amendment to
 Contract DA­5382 with LAZ Parking California, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 14
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(14) 21­1266­S1
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS
 (Board) relative to approving the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5318
 with RS&H California, Inc., to increase the contract value, covering
 professional engineering and construction administration services in
 support of the Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP)
 Roadways, Utilities, and Enabling Projects at the Los Angeles International
 Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to Contract DA­5318 with
 RS&H California, Inc., to increase the contract value by $450,000,
 for new total not to exceed $4,700,000, covering professional
 engineering and construction administration services in support of
 the LAMP Roadways, Utilities, and Enabling Projects at LAX.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27557, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Second Amendment to
 Contract DA­5318 with RS&H California, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 15
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 23, 2022)


 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(15) 22­1120
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY and BOARD OF
 AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board), and ORDINANCES FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to approving four Agreements and Grant of
 Utility Easements with Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Bell
 Telephone Company dba AT&T, XO Communications Services LLC, and
 Crown Castle Fiber LLC, covering operation and maintenance of existing
 underground utilities, as part of the Landside Access Modernization
 Program (LAMP) at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines, that it is
 within the scope of the certified LAMP Environmental Impact Report
 (State Clearinghouse No. 201521014), and that it does not include
 any changes to the project that would require further review under
 CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and
 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the four associated Agreements and Grant of Utility
 Easements with (i) Southern California Gas Company, (ii) Pacific
 Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T, (iii) XO Communications
 Services LLC, and (iv) Crown Castle Fiber LLC, covering operation
 and maintenance of existing underground utilities, as part of LAMP
 at LAX.


 3. MAKE appropriate findings and adopt ORDINANCES, to be
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 16
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant said four
 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the four associated Agreements and Grant of Utility
 Easements with (i) Southern California Gas Company, (ii) Pacific
 Bell Telephone Company dba AT&T, (iii) XO Communications
 Services LLC, and (iv) Crown Castle Fiber LLC, covering operation
 and maintenance of existing underground utilities, as part of LAMP
 at LAX.


 3. MAKE appropriate findings and adopt ORDINANCES, to be
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant said four
 associated Agreements and Grant of Utility Easements.


 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27556, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said four Agreements & Grant of
 Utility Easements.


 B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCES, dated
 October 4, 2022, authorizing the grant of non­exclusive utility easement to:
 Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Southern California Gas Company,
 Crown Castle Fiber LLC, and XO Communications Services LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The Board
 reports that there is no impact to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(16) 22­1119
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY and BOARD OF
 AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board), and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to approving the Agreement and Grant of Utility
 Easement with Teleport Communications America, LLC, for relocated
 telecommunication infrastructure, as part of the Landside Access
 Modernization Program (LAMP) at the Los Angeles International Airport
 (LAX).
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 17
 A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD
 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(16) 22­1119
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION,
 COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY and BOARD OF
 AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (Board), and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to approving the Agreement and Grant of Utility
 Easement with Teleport Communications America, LLC, for relocated
 telecommunication infrastructure, as part of the Landside Access
 Modernization Program (LAMP) at the Los Angeles International Airport
 (LAX).

 A. COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(i) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines, and is also
 within the scope of the certified LAMP Environmental Impact Report
 (State Clearinghouse No. 2015021014) and does not include any
 changes to the project that would require further review under CEQA
 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA
 Guidelines Section 15162.


 2. APPROVE the Agreement and Grant of Utility Easement with
 Teleport Communications America, LLC, covering 5200­5212 Arbor
 Vitae Street, for relocated telecommunication infrastructure, as part
 of the LAMP at LAX.


 3. MAKE appropriate findings and adopt an ORDINANCE, to be
 prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, to grant a utility
 easement to Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 4. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 4, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27555, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee, Los
 Angeles World Airports, to execute said Agreement and Grant of
 Utility Easement with Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY
 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated October
 4, 2022, authorizing the granting of a non­exclusive utility easement to
 Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The Board
 reports that there is no impact to the General Fund.


 Wednesday Community - October
 Impact 12, 2022 -
 Statement: None submitted PAGE 18
 THE MAYOR:
 PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated October
 4, 2022, authorizing the granting of a non­exclusive utility easement to
 Teleport Communications America, LLC.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. The Board
 reports that there is no impact to the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(17) 22­1116
 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS
 (Board) relative to approving a three­year Contract with Global Access
 Supply, Inc, covering maintenance of the Airfield Lighting Control
 Monitoring System at the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

 Recommendation for Council action:


 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board that this action is exempt
 from the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.


 2. APPROVE the three­year Contract with Global Access Supply, Inc,
 covering maintenance of the Airfield Lighting Control Monitoring
 System at LAX, for cost not to exceed $411,000.


 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on August 18, 2022, by
 Resolution No. 27565, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or
 designee, Los Angeles World Airports, to execute said Contract
 with Global Access Supply, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 19
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 matter)
 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)


 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.


Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Closed Session

(18) 22­1079
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Amirrasam Mirhadi v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 19STCV07975. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall accident that occurred on May 18, 2018 at 10535 Wilshire
 Boulevard.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(19) 22­1080
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Margaret Gottfried v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 22STCV14593. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall incident which occurred on May 4, 2022 at or near 20700 Wells
 Drive in the City of Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 20
 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Margaret Gottfried v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 22STCV14593. (This matter arises from a trip
 and fall incident which occurred on May 4, 2022 at or near 20700 Wells
 Drive in the City of Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(20) 22­1081
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Betty Schilling, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los
 Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCV14936. (This matter arises from
 an automobile v. pedestrian accident that occurred on May 17, 2019, at or
 near 8628 Balboa Bouelvard in Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(21) 22­1082
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Daniel Turner v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States
 District Court Case No. CV18­03405­DDP­KSx. (This matter arises from
 an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on
 March 22, 2017, in Los Angeles, California.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(22) 22­1083
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Frank Preciado v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior
 Court Case No. 19STCV12061. (This matter arises from a compliant of
 discrimination based on race and national origin, hostile work environment
 harassment, and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment &
 Housing Act against the City.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 Wednesday - October
 (Continued from 12, 2022
 Council - of October 14, 2022)
 meeting PAGE 21
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Frank Preciado v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior
 Court Case No. 19STCV12061. (This matter arises from a compliant of
 discrimination based on race and national origin, hostile work environment
 harassment, and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment &
 Housing Act against the City.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(23) 22­1084
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled David Williams v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles
 Superior Court Case No. 20STCV07606. (This matter arises from a
 bicycle accident that occurred on March 5, 2019 near 2581 South
 Sepulveda Boulevard in Los Angeles.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.
(24) 22­0989
 The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government
 Code Section 54956.9(d)(4), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the
 case entitled Green Leaf Caregivers. (This case arises from a Business
 License Tax assessment for a taxpayer who approached the City to resolve
 the tax liability through the Settlement Bureau.)
 (Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in
 Closed Session on October 3, 2022)

 (Continued from Council meeting of October 14, 2022)

 Item continued to Council meeting of October 14, 2022 due to loss of quorum.


Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment



ENDING ROLL CALL
Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (10);
Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee (4)
 Wednesday - October 12, 2022 - PAGE 22