HHS and Public Safety Committee — Portland, ME
Date: 2026-06-09
Time: 17:30

Remote HHS and Public Safety MEMBERS
Meeting Agenda Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4, Chair
 Councilor April Fournier, At-Large
June 9, 2026 at 5:30 PM
 Councilor Sarah Michniewicz, District 1
Remote Meeting Councilor Wesley Pelletier, District 2



To submit written public comment on an agenda item, email HHSPS@portlandmaine.gov. Submissions must be
received by 12:00 pm the day before the Health & Human Services and Public Safety meeting to guarantee their
inclusion in the agenda packet. All submissions must include the commenter's name and legal address. To help
ensure your comment is submitted for the correct item, please include the name of the agenda item (see below).

The Health & Human Services and Public Safety Committee will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom
pursuant to the Remote Meeting Policy adopted by the Portland City Council. Allow your computer to install
the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to attend live either in person or via
Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the meeting.

You are invited to a Zoom webinar!
When: Jun 9, 2026 05:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Topic: Remote HHS and Public Safety Meeting

Join from PC, Mac, iPad, or Android:
https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/88619561103?pwd=ivQClk99EsOQfTnRcw3ZagNnTgDKBD.1
Passcode:481969

Phone one-tap:
+13126266799,,88619561103#,,,,*481969# US (Chicago)
+16469313860,,88619561103#,,,,*481969# US

Join via audio:
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 305 224 1968 US
+1 309 205 3325 US
+1 386 347 5053 US
+1 507 473 4847 US
+1 564 217 2000 US
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 689 278 1000 US
+1 719 359 4580 US
+1 253 205 0468 US
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 360 209 5623 US
Webinar ID: 886 1956 1103
Passcode: 481969
International numbers available: https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/u/kbRjcQuNt5




1. Announcements


 a. August City Council Workshop: Family Shelter Relocation
2. Review and Approval of Minutes from May 12, 2026


 a. Draft minutes.
3. Overdose Prevention Centers (Mary Christie, Associate Corporation Counsel)
 Corporation Counsel to give an update on the legal landscape as it pertains to Overdose
 Prevention Centers.
 a. Memorandum: Legal Landscape of Overdose Prevention Centers
4. Syringe Redemption Update (Bridget Rauscher, Director of Public Health)
 An update on the progress and ongoing operations of the Harm Reduction Services’
 Syringe Redemption Program.
 a. Memorandum: Update on Syringe Redemption Program
5. Public Safety Update (Mark Dubois, Police Chief)
 A standing public safety update that alternates each month between the Police and Fire
 departments.
 a. Presentation: Traffic Update
6. Next Meeting: July 14, 2026

Remote HHS and Public Safety MEMBERS
Meeting Agenda Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4, Chair
 Councilor April Fournier, At-Large
June 9, 2026 at 5:30 PM
 Councilor Sarah Michniewicz, District 1
Remote Meeting Councilor Wesley Pelletier, District 2



To submit written public comment on an agenda item, email HHSPS@portlandmaine.gov. Submissions must be
received by 12:00 pm the day before the Health & Human Services and Public Safety meeting to guarantee their
inclusion in the agenda packet. All submissions must include the commenter's name and legal address. To help
ensure your comment is submitted for the correct item, please include the name of the agenda item (see below).

The Health & Human Services and Public Safety Committee will conduct this meeting remotely via Zoom
pursuant to the Remote Meeting Policy adopted by the Portland City Council. Allow your computer to install
the free Zoom app to get the best meeting experience. If you are not able to attend live either in person or via
Zoom, a recording will be available in the Agenda Center following the meeting.

You are invited to a Zoom webinar!
When: Jun 9, 2026 05:30 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada)
Topic: Remote HHS and Public Safety Meeting

Join from PC, Mac, iPad, or Android:
https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/j/88619561103?pwd=ivQClk99EsOQfTnRcw3ZagNnTgDKBD.1
Passcode:481969

Phone one-tap:
+13126266799,,88619561103#,,,,*481969# US (Chicago)
+16469313860,,88619561103#,,,,*481969# US

Join via audio:
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 305 224 1968 US
+1 309 205 3325 US
+1 386 347 5053 US
+1 507 473 4847 US
+1 564 217 2000 US
+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 689 278 1000 US
+1 719 359 4580 US
+1 253 205 0468 US
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 360 209 5623 US
Webinar ID: 886 1956 1103

 Page 1
Passcode: 481969
International numbers available: https://portlandmaine-gov.zoom.us/u/kbRjcQuNt5




1. Announcements


 a. August City Council Workshop: Family Shelter Relocation
2. Review and Approval of Minutes from May 12, 2026


 a. Draft minutes.
3. Overdose Prevention Centers (Mary Christie, Associate Corporation Counsel)
 Corporation Counsel to give an update on the legal landscape as it pertains to Overdose
 Prevention Centers.
 a. Memorandum: Legal Landscape of Overdose Prevention Centers
4. Syringe Redemption Update (Bridget Rauscher, Director of Public Health)
 An update on the progress and ongoing operations of the Harm Reduction Services’
 Syringe Redemption Program.
 a. Memorandum: Update on Syringe Redemption Program
5. Public Safety Update (Mark Dubois, Police Chief)
 A standing public safety update that alternates each month between the Police and Fire
 departments.
 a. Presentation: Traffic Update
6. Next Meeting: July 14, 2026




 Page 2
 Health & Human Services and Public Safety Committee

 May 12, 2026 5:30 PM Remote Meeting

Committee Attendance:
Anna Bullett, Chair (District 4), Sarah Michniewicz (District 1), Wesley Pelletier (District 2),
Councilor April Fournier (At-Large)
Councilor Attendance:
City Staff:
Adam Harr, Executive Assistant; Greg Jordan, Assistant City Manager; Mark Dubois, Police
Chief; Maggie McLoughlin, Director or HHS; Dena Libner, Assistant City Manager;
Management Coordinator; Nicole Albert, Associate Corporation Counsel.

1. Announcements
 • The Day Space agenda item is postponed.
2. Review and Approval of Minutes from April 14, 2026
 • Councilor Michniewicz moved to approve the minutes; seconded by Councilor Pelletier. The
 minutes were approved unanimously 3-0 with Councilor Fournier not in attendance.

 3. Overdose Prevention Centers
Chair Bullett gave background information about this harm reduction model that she learned of last year
from a panel discussion on emerging strategies to combat overdose deaths with Gordon Smith, Maine
Director of Opioid Response. She noted an overdose prevention center opened in Rhode Island for
supervised, safe injection and wrap around services. With the circumstances that people are using drugs in
public which is dangerous for the users and disturbs the public, the Chair checked with the committee if
they support exploring this model by first asking Corporation Counsel to research the legal landscape as
Rhode Island’s center required change state laws in order to operate legally.

Councilor Michniewicz is open to it the model within the legal landscape and wants data to know
what to expect for impacts to its neighbors and program outcomes, stating they do not increase
crime but also do not decrease crime. If a goal is to move drug use from public to private spaces,
will there be associated changes in acceptance of public drug use to compel people to change
where they use drugs?

Councilor Pelletier thinks bringing people into a safe space that can make connections to
treatment makes sense.

4. Cruise Ship Infectious Disease

Public Health Director, Bridget Rauscher reviewed the memo attached in the packet which details how
outbreaks on cruise ships managed through established federal and state public health protocols as well as




 Page 3
operational decisions the Portland Public Health Division can make to support the public in mitigating
infectious disease risk, including website communications and prevention campaigns.

Councilor Pelletier asked about the distinction between international and domestic cruise and if Public
Health has considered using the text alert system. Director, Bridget Rauscher explained that ships with an
international itinerary report to the Vessel Sanitation Program whereas ships with a domestic-only
itinerary report to the CDC through other mechanisms. She continued that Public Health had not
previously considered using the text alert system due to cruise ships having a mechanism to isolate
symptomatic people and as not to incite unnecessary fear. Director Rauscher noted the opt-in text alert is
a possibility and flagged that the Division is focused on prevention campaigns though can continue to
explore this.

Councilor Bullett said that the business community should be included before decisions are made or
action is taken and asked if there are hand sanitation/washing stations when disembarking. Director
Rauscher replied they are present and it is possible to expand.

Councilor Michniewicz sees merit for and against alerts, but thinks that information will spread from
other sources; an opt-in alert from the City would be factually accurate and succinct.

5. Public Safety Update; Fire
Chief Johnston provided an update on calls for service and staffing levels.

Councilor Bullet asked what C9 and Technical rescues are. Chief Johnston explained tharC9 is the
Paramedic Lieutenant who operates out of Central and provides operational assistance to the ambulances
and firetrucks on the road; technical rescues are out of the norm and low in volume, but often specialized
skills and equipment, for example: rope rescue, extrication (rescuing someone stuck in a well or mangled
vehicle, water rescues, etc.).

6. Next meeting is June 9, 2026.
Councilor Michniewicz moved to adjourn, and was seconded by Councilor Pelletier. The motion passed
unanimously 3-0 with Councilor Fournier absent; the meeting adjourned 6:19PM.




 Page 4
 Office of Corporation Counsel
 Michael Goldman, Corporation Counsel
 Amy R. McNally, Associate Corporation Counsel
 Nicole M. Albert, Associate Corporation Counsel
 Rachel L. Millette, Associate Corporation Counsel
 Avery A. Dandreta, Associate Corporation Counsel
 Mary C. Christie, Associate Corporation Counsel




 MEMORANDUM

To: Health & Human Services and Public Safety Committee

From: Mary Christie, Associate Corporation Counsel

Date: June 9, 2026

Subject: Legal Landscape of Overdose Prevention Centers
______________________________________________________________________________


This memo was prepared at the request of the Portland City Council’s Health and Human Services and Public Safety
Committee (the “Committee”), in order to inform the Committee’s exploration of overdose prevention centers
(OPCs), also known as safe injection sites or harm reduction centers among other names.

Federal Law

The primary legal obstacle at the federal level to opening or operating an OPC is the Controlled Substances Act (CSA),
specifically 21 U.S.C. § 856, commonly known as the “Crack House Statute” and in particular section (a):

 §856. Maintaining drug-involved premises
 (a) Unlawful acts
 Except as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful to-
 (1) knowingly open, lease, rent, use, or maintain any place, whether permanently or temporarily,
 for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance;
 (2) manage or control any place, whether permanently or temporarily, either as an owner, lessee,
 agent, employee, occupant, or mortgagee, and knowingly and intentionally rent, lease, profit from, or
 make available for use, with or without compensation, the place for the purpose of unlawfully
 manufacturing, storing, distributing, or using a controlled substance.

Prior to its passage, it was difficult to shut down so-called crack houses—properties, often abandoned, where people
gathered to buy, sell, use, or manufacture drugs—leading police and prosecutors to go after the owners under



 389 Congress Street, Room 211 Portland, Maine 04101 | t: 207-874-8480

 Page 5
conspiracy and distribution charges.1 Thus, the purpose of §856 was specifically to provide a tool for prosecutors “to
arrest and convict otherwise criminal behavior.”2

There is limited case law applying §856 to OPCs. Current federal precedent comes from the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit in a case entitled United States v. Safehouse. In this case, the United States Department
of Justice (DOJ) sought a declaratory judgment and injunction against Safehouse, a non-profit organization
attempting to open an OPC in the City of Philadelphia, contending that the OPC would violate the CSA. The court
held that because the site’s explicit purpose was to provide a space where users could consume illicit drugs, it
satisfied the criminal intent requirement of §856 and thus explicitly violated federal law, despite Safehouse’s public
health motivations for opening the space.3 Safehouse appealed the ruling to the Supreme Court, which denied
certiorari, leaving this precedent standing.

State Legislation

Despite the federal obstacles, some states and municipalities have moved forward to open OPCs. Thus far, two
approaches have been taken: (1) via state-authorized pilot (Rhode Island) and (2) under municipal non-enforcement
(New York City).

State-Authorized Pilot

In 2021, Rhode Island passed a law to establish OPCs, allowing a two-year pilot program, which was reauthorized in
2023.4 Under the state law, upon municipal authorization, organizations may open and operate OPCs, which are
regulated and overseen by the Rhode Island Department of Health. As a result, in January 2025, Project
Weber/RENEW, a peer-led organization providing harm reduction and recovery support services, opened the first
state-sanctioned overdose prevention center following municipal authorization by the City of Providence. Though
the state law allows organizations and municipalities to operate OPCs legally in the state without local police
interference, they remain fully vulnerable to federal prosecution. So far, however, there has been no federal action
taken against the OPC operating in Rhode Island. Like Rhode Island, Vermont and Minnesota have enacted
legislation authorizing OPCs, but to date, no sites have been opened in either state.5

Municipal Non-Enforcement

New York City, in the absence of state legislation authorizing OPCs, has taken the approach of municipal non-
enforcement, operating with city knowledge and cooperation. In November 2021, OnPoint NYC, a nonprofit
organization, opened OPCs at two existing syringe service programs (SSPs).6 Following a feasibility study led by the


1
  United States v. Safehouse, 985 F.3d 225 (3d Cir. 2021).
2
  Jeff Sherman, Note, United States v. Safehouse: The Future of Supervised Consumption Sites in Maine and Beyond,
74 Me. L. Rev. 303, 313 (2022).
3
  Safehouse, 985 F.3d at 229.
4
  R.I. Gen. Laws Chapter 23-12.10 Harm Reduction Center Advisory Committee and Program.
5
  Working Group to Study Methods of Preventing Opioid Overdose Deaths by Authorizing Harm Reduction Health
Centers, Report to the 132nd Maine Legislature Joint Standing Committee on Criminal Justice & Public Safety
(2025).
6
  Rebecca E. Giglio et al., The Nation’s First Publicly Recognized Overdose Prevention Centers: Lessons Learned in
New York City, 100 J. Urban Health 245 (2023).

 389 Congress Street, Room 211 Portland, Maine 04101 | t: 207-874-8480



 Page 6
NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (“NYC Department”), former Mayor Bill de Blasio announced support
for OPCs. As part of the study, the NYC Department looked at the then-current legal and political climate. Ultimately,
“the study concluded that state authorization through administrative or legislative action was the most politically
feasible and protective against legal challenges.”7

While the New York State legislature has introduced legislation regarding OPCs, that has since stalled. Instead, in
order to bring the OPCs into operation in NYC, NYC took the approach of political engagement of key local
stakeholders, including the New York Police Department, elected officials, and district attorneys, to “mitigate risks
of local enforcement against OPC operators” and “ensure successful service provision” and ultimately “secure
support for or, at minimum, neutrality toward OPCs.”8 So, while two OPCs successfully operate in NYC without local
interference, they do so without support or legal authorization from the state or federal government, thus facing
perpetual exposure to state or federal enforcement.

Maine Legislation

In Maine, three bills have been introduced since 2017 regarding authorization of OPCs:

 • 128th Maine Legislature (2017) LD 1375: “An Act to Prevent Overdose Deaths and Infectious Disease by
 Establishing Safer Drug Use Facilities” – Directed the Department of Health and Human Services to certify
 up to two overdose prevention centers but ultimately failed to pass.
 • 131st Maine Legislature (2023) LD 1159): “An Act to Establish a Pilot Project Regarding Harm Reduction
 Health Centers” – Directed the Department of Health and Human Services to create a 2-year OPC pilot
 project but never received a vote in the House or the Senate.
 • 131st Maine Legislature (2023) LD 1364: “An Act to Prevent Opioid Overdose Deaths by Establishing Safe
 Consumption Site”
LD 1364 began as a bill to “authorize municipalities to approve overdose prevention centers for individuals to self-
administer previously obtained drugs,” establish site requirements, and provide “immunity from arrest or
prosecution for participants and staff members acting in accordance with the provisions of the bill,” similar to the
legislation passed in Rhode Island.9 The final version of the bill instead established the Working Group to Study
Methods of Preventing Opioid Overdose Deaths by Authorizing Harm Reduction Health Centers. The Working Group
presented its Report to the 132nd Maine Legislature Joint Standing Committee on Criminal Justice & Public Safety on
February 28, 2025. Its findings and recommendations included legal recommendations, emphasizing the State’s
ability to create statutory authority for one or more OPCs but warning of the impact federal political shifts may have
over time.10

Conclusion

Ultimately, the legal landscape around OPCs remains relatively dynamic and unsettled, varying by state and
continuing to evolve at the federal level. The legal risk to the city or operator, if the city chose to permit or operate




7
  Id. at 246.
8
  Id. at 247-8.
9
  Working Group at 7.
10
 Id. At 10-11.

 389 Congress Street, Room 211 Portland, Maine 04101 | t: 207-874-8480



 Page 7
OPCs in the absence of federal or state authorization, will depend heavily on the political climate at both the state
and federal level.




 389 Congress Street, Room 211 Portland, Maine 04101 | t: 207-874-8480



 Page 8
City of Portland | Health and Human Services
Maggie McLoughlin, Director

To: Health and Human Services & Public Safety Committee
Councilor Anna Bullett, Chair

From: Bridget Rauscher, Director of Public Health
Date: June 3rd, 2026
Re: Update on Syringe Redemption Program




MEETING DATE
June 9, 2026

AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Item # 4 “Syringe Redemption Update”

PURPOSE
To update the Health and Human Services and Public Safety (HHS&PS) Committee on the progress
and ongoing operations of the Harm Reduction Services’ Syringe Redemption Program.

COMMITTEE WORK PLAN/CITY COUNCIL GOAL ALIGNMENT
The HHS & PS Committee 2025 workplan includes the topic of “addressing the opioid epidemic” as
its top priority for the year.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
An increase in syringe litter led to the development of a syringe services operational improvement
plan implemented in fall 2024. Simultaneously, Portland Public Health began exploring
opportunities to utilize national opioid settlement funds allocated to Portland. The Syringe
Redemption Pilot Project was approved in October, 2024 and implemented in January, 2025. One of
only three documented programs in the United States, this program aimed to support individuals
impacted by the opioid epidemic while reducing syringe litter. An update on progress was provided
at the HHS&PS Committee meeting in October, 2025, at which time the Syringe Redemption
Program received approval to continue operations.

This memo serves as the second update on the implementation of the Syringe Redemption Program.




 1

 Page 9
2024/2025/2026 SYRINGE SERVICES PROGRAM YTD COMPARISON REPORT
 Jan 1 -Dec 31, 2024 Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2025 Jan 1-May 31, 2026*
Unique clients served 2,498 1,957 895
Total clients enrolled 277 301 105
Total syringe exchanges 8,620 8,393 2,779
# Syringes distributed 952,411 1,107,581 344,663
# Syringes collected 577,517 877,596 243,219
Return Rate (%) 61% 79% 71%




SYRINGE REDEMPTION PROGRAM UPDATE
January 14, 2025 - May 31, 2026

The Syringe Redemption Pilot Project was implemented with financial support from opioid
settlement funds allocated by the City Council. As of May 31, 2026, $53,154.50 has been distributed to
581 unique participants by the redemption program. Harm Reduction Services is developing a
redemption program dashboard to be hosted on the city website to reflect near real-time program
impacts. The current dashboard with program data from program inception (1/13/2025) to date
(5/31/2026) is below:




 2

 Page 10
In March 2026, four focus groups were held with 27 unique clients of Portland’s SSP. The focus
groups collected data regarding participant experiences with the Syringe Redemption Program,
including broader effects of the program on life and community, feedback regarding program
improvements, and current implementation processes. Through these conversations, the following
themes were identified:

 ●​ The program is highly valued among participants
 ●​ Financial incentive is the primary participation driver
 ●​ There are clear and consistent community safety benefits
 ●​ Program capacity limits engagement
 ●​ Eligibility rules can be perceived as inequitable and stigmatizing
 ●​ Participation improves health and safety practices
 ●​ Redemption serves as a gateway to health services
 ●​ Supply gaps (grabbers, puncture proof gloves) limit potential
 ●​ Ending the program may rapidly reverse gains




 3

 Page 11
IMPROPER DISPOSAL REPORTS
Since the redemption program launched in January 2025, SeeClickFix requests for needle pick ups
have remained consistently lower than the summer 2024 peak (which reached 194-231 requests per
month), ranging between 44-133 requests per month. In 2024, reports averaged 116 per month,
compared to 81 per month in 2025 and 67 per month (January - May) in 2026.

City of Portland SeeClickFix Sharps Collection Reports, Jan-May 2024-2026
 Sharps
 Period Parks/Trails Containers Other Total
Jan - May, 2024 2066 18,530 573 21,169
Jan - May, 2025 1787 2,317 4,109 8,213
Jan - May, 2026 1,819 1,622 1,527 4,968

Note: Parks, Recreation, and Facilities maintains the city Survey 123 form that both their department and
the Public Health Division use to report collections of syringes from public spaces. Public Works responds to
the majority of SeeClickFix requests for needle pick-up (usually small quantity) and does not report to the
Survey123 form.




HARM REDUCTION AMBASSADORS
From April 2025-January 2026, the Harm Reduction Services Program implemented a Harm
Reduction Ambassador program, recruiting SSP participants who were paid to collect sharps from
the community. This included from the ground in public/private spaces, folks using drugs in the
community, and other sources. The spike in the "Other" category during Jan–May 2025 is
substantially explained by ambassador-assisted collections, which account for approximately 3,300
of the 4,109 syringes collected.


 4

 Page 12
FISCAL IMPACT
The program is funded through the City’s Opioid Settlement Funds, with an estimated $75,000/year
impact on the settlement fund balance.

CONCLUSION(S)
At this time, Public Health staff are confident that the Syringe Redemption Program is both
contributing to an overall reduction in the improper disposal of syringes in Portland and providing a
valuable opportunity for SSP clients to directly receive Opioid Settlement Funds, as intended. In
addition to the environmental and financial benefits of the program, as outlined in the themes from
the focus groups, clients are utilizing prevention activities (HIV/HCV testing), accessing basic needs,
and continuing to engage in

Interpreting syringe litter trends before and after program launch requires caution, because a simple
pre/post comparison does not address what litter would have looked like had the program never
started. The program launched during a period of significant and documented growth in the client
population accessing Portland's SSP, which peaked at over 800 unique clients per month in late 2024
and early 2025, roughly triple the volume seen in 2022-2023.

Portland’s Syringe Redemption Program is historic as the third such program in the country
following Boston and New York City. Boston's Community Syringe Redemption Program, which ran
from 2020 to 2024 before a funding lapse, is the subject of the only published peer-reviewed
evaluation of this model to date (Le et al., Policy Studies Journal, 2025). They found significant
reductions in syringe complaints and publicly discarded syringes within a half-mile of the
redemption site, but not beyond this radius, underscoring the difficulty with implying causation to
evaluating these programs from basic counts.

Several additional confounders further complicate interpretation: the redemption program is not the
only exchange operating in Portland; ambassador and outreach staffing capacity varied across the
period; and there is considerable seasonal variation as the winter months limit syringe collection.

Taking all of these considerations in mind, a more rigorous epidemiological assessment would be
needed to draw causal conclusions on the impact of the redemption program on syringe litter in
Portland, and this is an evaluation the program could consider as it matures.

PRIOR COMMITTEE REVIEW
HHS & PS Committee - March and October, 2025

PREPARED BY
Bridget Rauscher
Public Health Director
Health and Human Services




 5

 Page 13
Health and Human Service / Public
 Safety Committee
 Public Safety
 Trafﬁc Update
 Portland Police Department




 June 9, 2026
 Page 14
Total Crashes: Year-to-Date Comparison


● The total number of crashes is down
 14.5% through the ﬁrst ﬁve months of
 2026 compared to the same timeframe
 last year.

● May 2026 marked the 15th consecutive
 month with a year-over-year reduction
 in crashes.




 Page 15
Total Crashes: Yearly Overview

● Total crashes declined by 6.7% in 2025,
 falling from 3,219 in 2024 to 3,003.

● 2025 recorded the lowest number of
 crashes since 2021.

● Five trafﬁc fatalities were recorded in
 2025, compared to three in 2024.

● Trafﬁc stops and citations increased
 signiﬁcantly in 2025, while total
 crashes decreased by 6.7%.




 Page 16
Stops and Citations: Year-to-Date Comparison

 ● Trafﬁc enforcement activity
 has increased signiﬁcantly,
 with 40% more trafﬁc stops
 than during the same period
 last year.

 ● A 46% increase in citations
 issued compared to the same
 period in 2025.

 ● A total of 28 additional
 enforcement details have
 been completed in 2026 to
 date.




 Page 17
Stops and Citations: Yearly Overview

 ● 3,636 motor vehicle stops
 conducted in 2025, a 17%
 increase from 2024.

 ● 1,180 citations issued in
 2025, representing a 103%
 increase over 2024.

 ● Trafﬁc enforcement activity
 continues to trend upward
 following several years of
 reduced activity.

 ● 2025 recorded the highest
 citation total in four years.




 Page 18
Health and Human Service / Public
 Safety Committee
 Public Safety
 Trafﬁc Update
 Portland Police Department




 June 9, 2026
 Page 19