City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-10-04
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Tuesday, October 4, 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
 Tuesday
purpose. Proof of - October
 a negative test requires a printed document,4, email,
 2022 -or text message displayed on aPAGE 1 from a test
 phone
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be
submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.


Telecommunication Relay Services


Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.


Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.


What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.


Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.


For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 2
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.


The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.


PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.


The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.


If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 3
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 4
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Tuesday, October 4, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items Noticed for Public Hearing

(1) 22­0964
 CD 13 HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of
 Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off­
 site consumption at Mother's California Market, located at 6677 West
 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 105­109.

 Applicant: Mother's Market & Kitchen, Inc.
 Representative: Dan Kramer, Dan Kramer Law Group


 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 5
 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 17, 2022
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Tuesday, October 4, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items Noticed for Public Hearing

(1) 22­0964
 CD 13 HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of
 Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off­
 site consumption at Mother's California Market, located at 6677 West
 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 105­109.

 Applicant: Mother's Market & Kitchen, Inc.
 Representative: Dan Kramer, Dan Kramer Law Group


 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 17, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 9, 2022)


 (Motion required for Findings and Council recommendations for
 the above application)




Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(2) 11­1189
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the re­exemption of one Second Deputy General Manager
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 6
 Harbor (Class Code 0807) position for the Harbor Department from the
 the above application)




Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(2) 11­1189
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the re­exemption of one Second Deputy General Manager
 Harbor (Class Code 0807) position for the Harbor Department from the
 Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the re­exemption of one Second Deputy General Manager
 Harbor (Class Code 0807) position for the Harbor Department from the
 Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)


(3) 22­1057
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the exemption of one Senior Project Coordinator position (Class
 Code 1538) for the City Administrative Officer (CAO) from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the exemption of one Senior Project Coordinator position
 (Class Code 1538) for the CAO from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter
 Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the CAO
 nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 Tuesday TIME LIMIT
 - October FILE
 4, 2022 - ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022PAGE 7
 Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the CAO
 nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)


(4) 22­1059
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the re­exemption of one Assistant Director Bureau of Street
 Services (Class Code 4156) position for the Bureau of Street Services
 (BSS) from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the exemption of one Assistant Director Bureau of Street
 Services (Class Code 4156) position for the BSS from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)


(5) 21­1497
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497­S1 and 21­1497­S2

 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ERRATUM,
 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
 MONITORING PROGRAM, RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
 QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Vesting
 Tentative Tract Map and Haul Route appeal for the properties located at
 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 – 679 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:​
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 8
 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ERRATUM,
 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
 MONITORING PROGRAM, RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
 QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Vesting
 Tentative Tract Map and Haul Route appeal for the properties located at
 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 – 679 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:​


 1. FIND, that the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC)
 has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR
 No. ENV­2016­3691­EIR [State Clearinghouse (SCH) No.
 2018021068], dated December 2020, the Final EIR, dated August
 2021 (676 Mateo Street Project EIR), and Erratum, dated October
 2021, as well as the whole of the administrative record.


 2. CERTIFY the following:

 a. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR has been completed in
 compliance with CEQA.


 b. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR was presented to the
 Advisory Agency as a decision­making body of the lead
 agency.


 c. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR reflects the independent
 judgment and analysis of the lead agency.


 3. ADOPT the following:

 a. The related and prepared 676 Mateo Street Project EIR
 Environmental Findings.


 b. The Statement of Overriding Considerations.


 c. The Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the 676
 Mateo Street Project EIR.


 4. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the LACPC as the Findings of Council.


 5. R E S O L V E T O D E N Y T H E A P P E A L f i l e d b y C R E E D L A
 (Representative: Kendra Hartman, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph &
 Cardozo), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the decision of the LACPC in
 sustaining the Deputy Advisory Agency's determination in certifying
 the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR Environmental Findings,
Tuesday - October
 Statement 4, 2022 - Considerations, andPAGE
 of Overriding 9
 the Mitigation
 Monitoring Program prepared for the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR;
 Mateo Street Project EIR.


 4. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the LACPC as the Findings of Council.


 5. R E S O L V E T O D E N Y T H E A P P E A L f i l e d b y C R E E D L A
 (Representative: Kendra Hartman, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph &
 Cardozo), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the decision of the LACPC in
 sustaining the Deputy Advisory Agency's determination in certifying
 the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR Environmental Findings,
 Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation
 Monitoring Program prepared for the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR;
 and approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 74550­CN for the
 merger and re­subdivision of eight existing lots into one ground lot
 for commercial and live/work condominium purposes, as shown on
 map stamp­dated September 2, 2020, and a Haul Route for the
 export of approximately 74,500 cubic yards of soil; for the properties
 located at 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679 South
 Imperial Street, subject to Conditions of Approval as modified by the
 PLUM Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA,LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. VTT­74550­CN­2A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 12, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 12, 2022)


(6) 21­1497­S1
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S2

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and PLANNING AND LAND
 USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an
 appeal filed for a Main Conditional Use Permit and a Site Plan Review for
 the properties located at 668 ​­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679
 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 Tuesday OF THE MAYOR:
 - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 10
(6) 21­1497­S1
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S2

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and PLANNING AND LAND
 USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an
 appeal filed for a Main Conditional Use Permit and a Site Plan Review for
 the properties located at 668 ​­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679
 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 Project was assessed in the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR No.
 ENV­2016­3691­EIR, State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2018021068,
 certified on October 28, 2021; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164,
 no subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration, or Addendum is required
 for approval of the Project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. R E S O L V E T O D E N Y T H E A P P E A L f i l e d b y C R E E D L A
 (Representative: Kendra Hartmann, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph &
 Cardozo) and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC
 in approving a Main Conditional Use Permit for the on­site sale of a
 full­line of alcoholic beverages within four establishments, and a Site
 Plan Review for a project resulting in an increase of 50 or more
 dwelling units; for the demolition of an existing warehouse and
 surface parking lot, and the construction of a 197,355­square­foot
 mixed­use building including 185 live/work units, 23,380 square feet
 of commercial space, and associated parking facilities on a 44,839
 square foot lot, the project also proposes the ability to implement a
 Flexibility Option that would provide the flexibility to increase the
 commercial square footage provided by the project from 23,380
 square feet to 45,873 square feet, which would reduce the overall
 amount of live/work units from 185 to 159, for the properties located
 at 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679 South Imperial
 Street, subject to Conditions of Approval, as modified by the PLUM
 Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA, LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: VTT­74550­CN­1A
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 11
 Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA, LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: VTT­74550­CN­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(7) 21­1497­S2
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S1

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS; PLANNING AND
 LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION, AND
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan
 Amendment (GPA) and a Vesting Zone and Height District Change for the
 properties located at 668­678 South Mateo Street and 669­679 South
 Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 project was assessed in the 676 Mateo Street Project (Project), EIR
 No. ENV­2016­3691­EIR, S t a t e C l e a r i n g h o u s e ( S C H ) N o .
 2018021068, certified on October 28, 2021; and pursuant to CEQA
 Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent EIR,
 Negative Declaration, or Addendum is required for approval of the
 Project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the
 Mayor and the LACPC, approving the GPA to the Central City North
 Community Plan, to change the land use designation from Heavy
 Industrial to Regional.


 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 Tuesday January- 27,
 October
 2022,4, 2022 -
 effectuating PAGE 12
 a Vesting Zone Change and Height
 District Change from M3­1­RIO to (T)(Q)C2­2­RIO, pursuant to Los
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the
 Mayor and the LACPC, approving the GPA to the Central City North
 Community Plan, to change the land use designation from Heavy
 Industrial to Regional.


 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 January 27, 2022, effectuating a Vesting Zone Change and Height
 District Change from M3­1­RIO to (T)(Q)C2­2­RIO, pursuant to Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.32 Q, for the
 demolition of an existing warehouse and surface parking lot, and the
 construction of a 197,355­square­foot mixed­use building including
 185 live/work units, 23,380 square feet of commercial space, and
 associated parking facilities on a 44,839 square foot lot; the Project
 also proposes the ability to implement a Flexibility Option that would
 provide the flexibility to increase the commercial square footage
 provided by the Project from 23,380 square feet to 45,873 square
 feet, which would reduce the overall amount of live/work units from
 185 to 159; for the properties located at 668 – 678 South Mateo
 Street and 669 – 679 South Imperial Street, subject to Conditions of
 Approval as modified by the PLUM Committee on September 20,
 2022.


 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General
 Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action.


 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.32 G:

 ...property shall not remain in a Q Qualified classification for more
 than six years unless during that time: (1) there is substantial
 physical development of the property to allow for one or more of
 the uses for which the Q Qualified classification was adopted; or (2)
 if no physical development is necessary, then the property is used
 for one or more of the purposes for which the Q Qualified
 classification was adopted... When these time limitations expire,
 the Q Qualified classification and the authority contained therein
 shall become null and void, the rezoning proceedings shall be
 terminated, and the property thereafter may only be utilized for
 those purposes permitted prior to the commencement of such
 rezoning proceedings.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.


Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 13
 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 those purposes permitted prior to the commencement of such
 rezoning proceedings.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.



 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee
 Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior
 to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination
 filing.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, and District Centre­GPA, LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown
 Case No. CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH. 2018021068
 Related Case: VTT­74550­CN­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(8) 22­0965
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to drafting ordinances to
 effectuate proposed adjustments to the Board of Police Commissioners
 (BPC) Service Fees for Fiscal Year 2022­23 (FY 22­23).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the proposed adjustments to the BPC Permit Fees for FY 22­
 23; and, REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present the
 appropriate ordinances to effectuate the proposed adjustments to the
 BPC Service Fees for FY 22­23 as recommended in the BPC report
 dated May 24, 2022, contained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO)
 report dated August 22, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22­0965.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the FY 22­23
 BPC Permit Fees are estimated to recover $9,831,882 in staff costs and
 expenses. The proposed fee adjustments reflect an increase to the
 Information Cards, Press Passes and Noise Variance permits. Fees from
 permits will be deposited into Revenue Source Code (RSC) No. 4071
 Tuesday - October
 Police Permits. The 4,  2022 -
 False PAGEto
 Alarm Fee will be reduced 14reflect a
 decrease in support staff from the Office of Finance. False Alarm Fees
 BPC Service Fees for FY 22­23 as recommended in the BPC report
 dated May 24, 2022, contained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO)
 report dated August 22, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22­0965.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the FY 22­23
 BPC Permit Fees are estimated to recover $9,831,882 in staff costs and
 expenses. The proposed fee adjustments reflect an increase to the
 Information Cards, Press Passes and Noise Variance permits. Fees from
 permits will be deposited into Revenue Source Code (RSC) No. 4071
 Police Permits. The False Alarm Fee will be reduced to reflect a
 decrease in support staff from the Office of Finance. False Alarm Fees
 are deposited into RSC No. 4078 Excessive False Alarm Fees. There is
 no additional impact to the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation
 stated in this report is in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in
 that the proposed fees are based on the full cost of operations and are
 monitored annually to ensure that the rates meet the reasonable cost for
 the services provided.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(9) 20­1168
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to developing a plan to
 increase the number of emergency relief and refuge centers per
 Community Plan Area; identifying resources and strategies to staff such
 facilities; and developing a plan for outreach for and promotion of such
 facilities.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Bonin ­
 Koretz):


 1. INSTRUCT the Emergency Management Department (EMD), in
 coordination with the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO), the Department of Recreation and
 Parks, the Department of General Services, the Library Department,
 the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, the Climate
 Emergency Mobilization Office, the Chief Heat Officer, the Mayor’s
 Office of Public Safety, and other agencies as appropriate, to:

 a. Develop a plan for a significant increase, at least one per
 Community Plan Area, in the number of emergency relief and
 refuge centers.


 b. Provide quarterly reports on all emergency relief related public
 centers (including but not limited to cooling centers, libraries,
 senior centers, community centers, resilience hubs, etc.) as it
 relates to the usage of these centers as well as a multi­year
 funding plan to continue public use and its funding. These
 Tuesday - October
 reports 4, 2022
 should -
 be inclusive of how manyPAGE 15could be
 centers
 considered emergency relief centers, how many participants
 a. Develop a plan for a significant increase, at least one per
 Community Plan Area, in the number of emergency relief and
 refuge centers.


 b. Provide quarterly reports on all emergency relief related public
 centers (including but not limited to cooling centers, libraries,
 senior centers, community centers, resilience hubs, etc.) as it
 relates to the usage of these centers as well as a multi­year
 funding plan to continue public use and its funding. These
 reports should be inclusive of how many centers could be
 considered emergency relief centers, how many participants
 use them, what emergency event precipitated the use of them,
 what services are available and what metrics of success could
 be used to measure them.


 2. INSTRUCT the EMD, the CLA, and the CAO to identify resources
 and strategies to staff such facilities, including potential use of the
 Disaster Service Worker Program, volunteers from organizations
 such as the Red Cross or graduates of the Community Emergency
 Response Team Program, and partnerships with community­based
 organizations, including but not limited to the successful mutual aid
 organizations that have been serving Angelenos during the
 pandemic.


 3. INSTRUCT the EMD, the Information Technology Agency, and other
 agencies as appropriate, to develop a plan for outreach for and
 promotion of such facilities, including but not limited to using the
 Nixle or emergency alert systems, and asking social media
 platforms to geo­target messages or alerts about available
 resources during times of crisis.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(10) 22­1016
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to execute six contracts for the provision of
 Lead Technical Services and Section 106 Historic Preservation Services
 for the ongoing operation of the Lead Hazard Remediation Program
 (LHRP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute
 contracts with the six contractors listed below for the provision of services
 related to the ongoing operation of the LHRP and Section 106 Historic
 Tuesday Preservation- October
 reviews, 4, in
 2022 -
 substantial conformance PAGE
 with16the draft
 agreements attached to the LAHD report dated July 25, 2022 in the
 Housing Department (LAHD) to execute six contracts for the provision of
 Lead Technical Services and Section 106 Historic Preservation Services
 for the ongoing operation of the Lead Hazard Remediation Program
 (LHRP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute
 contracts with the six contractors listed below for the provision of services
 related to the ongoing operation of the LHRP and Section 106 Historic
 Preservation reviews, in substantial conformance with the draft
 agreements attached to the LAHD report dated July 25, 2022 in the
 Council file, with a contract term of one year commencing on or around
 October 1, 2022, with an option to extend for two additional one­year
 terms, and compensation amounts not to exceed the amounts listed below
 for each contractor, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, contractor performance reviews, funding
 availability, and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements:


 a. ACC Environmental Consultants, Inc. for the provision of lead and
 asbestos inspection, survey, and analysis services for a contract
 amount not to exceed $5,000 from the Community Development
 Trust Fund No. 424.


 b. Lead Tech Environmental, Inc. for the provision of lead inspection,
 survey, and analysis services for a contract amount not to exceed
 $5,000 from the Community Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 c. EMSL Analytical, Inc. for the provision of laboratory lead and radon
 testing services for a contract amount not to exceed $10,000 from
 the Community Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 d. Forensic Analytical Consulting Services, as the recipient of a sole­
 source contract for the provision of technical training services, for a
 contract amount not to exceed $50,000 from the LAHD Small Grant
 Funds and Awards Fund No. 49N.


 e. Overland Pacific & Cutler for the provision of relocation services for
 a contract amount not to exceed $35,000 from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 f. ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of Section 106 Historic
 Preservation Services for a contract amount not to exceed
 $100,000 from the HOME Investment Partnership Program Fund
 No. 561 ($80,000) and the Community Development Trust Fund No.
 424 ($20,000). The $20,000 funding from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424 will be split between the
 Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD) and LAHD
 at $10,000 for each City department. The CIFD will engage directly
Tuesday with ICF- Jones
 October&4, 2022
 Stokes,- Inc. for the provision
 PAGE
 of 17
 services for
 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded projects
 Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 f. ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of Section 106 Historic
 Preservation Services for a contract amount not to exceed
 $100,000 from the HOME Investment Partnership Program Fund
 No. 561 ($80,000) and the Community Development Trust Fund No.
 424 ($20,000). The $20,000 funding from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424 will be split between the
 Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD) and LAHD
 at $10,000 for each City department. The CIFD will engage directly
 with ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of services for
 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded projects
 requiring environmental clearance review.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for the proposed
 contracts will be provided by the Community Development Trust Fund No.
 424, HOME Investment Partnership Program Fund No. 561, and the
 LAHD Small Grants and Awards Fund No. 49N.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(11) 18­0506­S1
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to
 accepting grant funds to fund the Los Angeles County Criminal Record
 Clearing Project administered by the City Attorney’s Homeless
 Engagement and Response Teams (HEART).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to approve the
 accompanying grant award between the City and the County of Los
 Angeles; and, AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to
 execute said grant award on behalf of the City, subject to the
 approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality.


 2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to accept the grant
 award in the amount of $965,635 for funding the HEART Criminal
 Records Clearance Project for the period of June 19, 2022 to June
 17, 2023.


 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to do the following:

 a. Establish a receivable in the amount of $965,635 within Fund
 Tuesday - October
 No. 368/12. 4, 2022 - PAGE 18
 approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality.


 2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to accept the grant
 award in the amount of $965,635 for funding the HEART Criminal
 Records Clearance Project for the period of June 19, 2022 to June
 17, 2023.


 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to do the following:

 a. Establish a receivable in the amount of $965,635 within Fund
 No. 368/12.


 b. Establish Appropriation Account No. 12V861 ­ HEART
 Criminal Records Clearance Project within Fund No. 368/12 in
 the amount of $965,635.


 c. Transfer $649,812 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No.
 12V861 ­ HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project to
 Fund No. 100/12, Account No. 001010 Salaries General.


 d. Upon receipt of grant funds and approval of expenses, transfer
 up to $283,188 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No. 12V861 ­
 HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project to Fund No.
 100/12, Revenue Source No. 5346­Related Costs
 Reimbursement ­ Grants.


 4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to prepare Controller instructions for
 any necessary technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the
 City Administrative Officer.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Attorney reports that the total cost of the
 Fiscal Year 2022­23 HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project is
 $1,077,947 of which $965,635 will be reimbursed by the County of Los
 Angeles, Public Defenders Department. The General fund contribution is
 $112,312 in related costs (CAP 41) which are already included in the
 2022­23 City budget.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(12) 20­1524­S5
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to
 funding for the continuation of the YMCA Shower Program.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (De León ­
 Harris­Dawson), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:


 Tuesday 1. APPROVE- October
 up to 4, 2022 - from Homeless Housing,
 $733,627 PAGE 19Assistance,
 and Prevention Grant Program Round 2 Fund No. 64J/10, Account
(12) 20­1524­S5
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to
 funding for the continuation of the YMCA Shower Program.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (De León ­
 Harris­Dawson), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:


 1. APPROVE up to $733,627 from Homeless Housing, Assistance,
 and Prevention Grant Program Round 2 Fund No. 64J/10, Account
 No. 10V773, Funding Category 3 ­ Street Strategy, Outreach, Public
 Health, and Hygiene to the Bureau of Sanitation, Fund No. 100/82,
 Account No. 003040 for the continuation of the YMCA Shower
 program from July 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023, in various
 Council Districts.


 2. AUTHORIZE City Administrative Officer (CAO) to prepare Controller
 instructions or make any necessary technical adjustments consistent
 with the intent of these transactions; and, AUTHORIZE the Controller
 to implement these instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(13) 21­0042­S3
 HOUSING and AD HOC ON COVID­19 RECOVERY AND
 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT COMMITTEES’ REPORTS relative to
 the City’s eviction moratorium during the COVID­19 pandemic, Emergency
 Rental Assistance Program, tenant protections, and related matters.

 A. HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT

 SUBMITS WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION the following
 recommendations of the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD),
 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the Los
 Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), to draft an Ordinance
 to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the Los Angeles Municipal
 Code (LAMC) to:

 a. Sunset LAMC Sections 49.99.2.A (non­payment of rent)
 effective December 31, 2022, except that:

 i. Effective November 1, 2022 through December
 31, 2022, tenants who are unable to pay rent, due
 Tuesday - Octoberto4, 2022 -
 COVID­19 PAGE
 financial impact, will have20continued
 eviction protection only if they provide their
 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the Los
 Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), to draft an Ordinance
 to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the Los Angeles Municipal
 Code (LAMC) to:

 a. Sunset LAMC Sections 49.99.2.A (non­payment of rent)
 effective December 31, 2022, except that:

 i. Effective November 1, 2022 through December
 31, 2022, tenants who are unable to pay rent, due
 to COVID­19 financial impact, will have continued
 eviction protection only if they provide their
 landlord a self­attestation notice under penalty of
 perjury in the format prescribed by the LAHD,
 within 7 days after rent is due.


 b. Sunset LAMC Sections 49.99.2.B (no­fault evictions),
 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets and additional tenants),
 and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal ­ Ellis)
 effective December 31, 2022, except that:

 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
 upon the effective date of the Ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in
 LAMC Section 151.09.


 ii. Provide that noncompliance and related inspection
 fees imposed between March 4, 2020 and
 December 31, 2022, due to a landlord’s inability to
 comply with a Government Order to Vacate as a
 result of the City’s COVID­19 eviction moratorium
 shall be waived by both the LAHD and Los
 Angeles Department of Building and Safety
 (LADBS).


 iii. Evictions in order to install a resident manager
 shall be allowed only when an on­site manager is
 required by law or in order to comply with the terms
 of an affordable housing covenant agreement.


 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove Rent Stabilization Ordinance
 (RSO) rental units from the rental market cannot be
 enforced until 60 days after the expiration of the
 eviction moratorium (60 days after December 31,
 2022).


 c. Provide that tenants must repay “COVID­19 rental debt”
Tuesday - as
 October 4, 2022in- California Code of PAGE
 defined Civil 21
 Procedure
 1179.02(c) (rental arrears accrued from March 1, 2020
 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove Rent Stabilization Ordinance
 (RSO) rental units from the rental market cannot be
 enforced until 60 days after the expiration of the
 eviction moratorium (60 days after December 31,
 2022).


 c. Provide that tenants must repay “COVID­19 rental debt”
 as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.02(c) (rental arrears accrued from March 1, 2020
 through September 30, 2021), by August 1, 2023, in
 accordance with State law, California Code of Civil
 Procedure 1179.05(a)(2)(B) and (C).


 d. Provide that tenants must repay rental arrears
 accumulated for rent due from October 1, 2021 through
 December 31, 2022, due to COVID­19 financial impact
 by December 31, 2023.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the LAHD,
 to draft an Ordinance to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in
 rental units formerly regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant
 Protections Ordinances as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO multi­family rental
 units; as well as rentals in corporate­owned single­family
 homes and condominiums subject to California Civil
 Code Section 1946.2, to restrict evictions to those
 reasons allowed under LAMC Section 151.09.


 b. Require payment for relocation services and monetary
 relocation assistance or all “No­Fault” eviction and the
 filing of Landlord Declarations of Intent to Evict for “no­
 Fault” reasons in the manner and amounts required
 under LAMC Section 151.09.
 i. Provide that a landlord may offset the tenant’s
 accumulated rental debt against the relocation
 assistance payment due under this Section. This
 exception to relocation shall not apply to evictions
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with the LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 c. Require written notification by landlords to inform tenants
 of their rights at the onset of a tenancy and the posting of
 a Tenant Protections Notification in a common area of
 the rental property in the format prescribed by the LAHD.


 d. Allow evictions in order to install a resident manager only
Tuesday when an
 - October on­site
 4, 2022 - manager is requiredPAGE  by law22
 or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with the LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 c. Require written notification by landlords to inform tenants
 of their rights at the onset of a tenancy and the posting of
 a Tenant Protections Notification in a common area of
 the rental property in the format prescribed by the LAHD.


 d. Allow evictions in order to install a resident manager only
 when an on­site manager is required by law or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 covenant agreement.


 e. Require the filing of notices to terminate tenancies from
 both RSO and non­RSO multi­family rental units and
 corporate­owned single­family homes and
 condominiums with the LAHD.


 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
 provisions listed in the above Recommendation Nos.
 2.b.i, 2.c, 2.d, and 2.e applicable to units subject to the
 RSO.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD, in collaboration with the City Attorney,
 to report back in 30 days on the feasibility of the following:

 a. Setting a reasonable financial and/or timeliness
 threshold for rental arrearages as the basis of evictions
 due to non­payment of rent.


 b. Requiring the payment of relocation assistance to
 tenants economically displaced when a landlord
 increases the rent by more than 10 percent in a 12­
 month period.


 4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to
 negotiate and execute a sole­source contract with BAE Urban
 Economics for a period of one year, commencing on
 September 30, 2022 through September 30, 2023, in an
 amount not to exceed $160,000, to conduct an expedited
 updated study and analysis of staffing resources needed and
 cost recovery for enforcement of expanded eviction
 protections and tenant anti­harassment programs, enhanced
 relocation assistance, and implementation of an eviction filing
 system.


 5. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish Appropriation Account
 43WC35 – Study on Eviction/Relocation under Fund No.
 440/43 – Rent Trust Fund, and Fund 41M/43 – Systematic
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 23
 Code Enforcement Trust Fund, and appropriate from the
 amount not to exceed $160,000, to conduct an expedited
 updated study and analysis of staffing resources needed and
 cost recovery for enforcement of expanded eviction
 protections and tenant anti­harassment programs, enhanced
 relocation assistance, and implementation of an eviction filing
 system.


 5. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish Appropriation Account
 43WC35 – Study on Eviction/Relocation under Fund No.
 440/43 – Rent Trust Fund, and Fund 41M/43 – Systematic
 Code Enforcement Trust Fund, and appropriate from the
 available cash balance, $80,000 for each fund to cover the
 cost of the BAE Urban Economics study on eviction, anti­
 harassment and relocation amounting to $160,000; and,
 expend funds upon written demand of the General Manager,
 LAHD, or designee.


 6. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst, together with the
 LAHD, LADBS, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
 (LADWP), and other City departments as needed, to conduct
 a review of mandated City fees [including RSO, Systematic
 Code Enforcement Program (SCEP), Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS), RecycLA, LADWP] impacting operating expenses in
 rental properties; and, instruct the LAHD to incorporate the
 findings on the study on the RSO annual allowable increase
 described in the above Recommendation No. 5.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to provide information on the LAHD
 website and conduct a comprehensive outreach campaign to
 inform tenants, landlords, and other interested parties about
 the City and County of Los Angeles COVID­19 Tenant
 Protections applicable to City of Los Angeles residents, with
 particular efforts targeted to tenants in areas identified as
 having high vulnerability, as discussed in the LAHD report,
 dated August 25, 2022, attached to the Council file.


 8. REQUEST the Rent Adjustment Commission, with the support
 of the LAHD, to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to
 implement the provisions in said LAHD report.


 B. A D H O C C O M M I T T E E O N C O V I D ­ 1 9 R E C O V E R Y A N D
 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT REPORT

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE
 APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the
 LAMC to:

Tuesday -a.October
 Sunset  4, 2022 -
 Sections PAGE 24 of rent)
 49.99.2.A (non­payment
 effective January 31, 2023, except that:
 B. A D H O C C O M M I T T E E O N C O V I D ­ 1 9 R E C O V E R Y A N D
 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT REPORT

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE
 APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the
 LAMC to:

 a. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.A (non­payment of rent)
 effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 i. Effective December 1, 2022 through January 31,
 2023, tenants who are unable to pay rent, due to
 COVID­19 financial impact, will have continued
 eviction protection only if the Tenant has provided
 notice to the Landlord of their inability to pay rent
 due to Financial Impacts Related to COVID­19,
 within seven (7) days after the date that the rent
 was due.


 b. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.B (no­fault evictions),
 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets and additional tenants),
 and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal ­ Ellis) of
 the LAMC effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
 upon the effective date of the ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in
 LAMC Section 151.09.


 ii. Provide that noncompliance and related inspection
 fees imposed between March 4, 2020 and
 January 31, 2023, due to a landlord’s inability to
 comply with a Government Order to Vacate as a
 result of the City’s COVID­19 eviction moratorium
 shall be waived by both LAHD and LADBS.


 iii. Evictions in order to install a resident manager
 shall be allowed only when an on­site manager is
 required by law or in order to comply with the terms
 of an affordable housing covenant agreement.


 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove RSO rental units from the
 rental market cannot be enforced until 60 days
 after the expiration of the eviction moratorium (60
 days after January 31, 2023).
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 25
 iii. Evictions in order to install a resident manager
 shall be allowed only when an on­site manager is
 required by law or in order to comply with the terms
 of an affordable housing covenant agreement.


 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove RSO rental units from the
 rental market cannot be enforced until 60 days
 after the expiration of the eviction moratorium (60
 days after January 31, 2023).


 v. REQUEST the City Attorney to include a new
 provision that RSO tenants whose no­fault
 evictions were paused due to the eviction
 moratorium under 49.99.2.B and who continue to
 reside in their units be provided with a minimum
 60­day notice and an opportunity to refile an
 appeal of the relocation amount due to them
 based on a change in disability status that affects
 the tenant’s qualification for a higher relocation
 payment.


 vi. Provide that no­fault evictions for unauthorized
 pets and/or tenants can be enforced only after
 January 31, 2024 and after the landlord has
 provided a 30 day notice for the tenant to remedy
 the situation.


 c. Provide that tenants must repay “COVID­19 rental debt”
 as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.02(c) (rental arrears accrued from March 1, 2020
 through September 30, 2021), by August 1, 2023, in
 accordance with State law, Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.05(a)(2)(B) and (C).


 d. Provide that tenants must repay rental arrears
 accumulated for rent due from October 1, 2021 through
 January 31, 2023, due to COVID­19 financial impact by
 February 1, 2024.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance for implementation on or before January 31,
 2023, to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in rental units formerly
 regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant Protections ordinances
 as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO rental units to restrict
 evictions to those reasons allowed under LAMC Section
 151.09.

Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 26
 b. Require payment for relocation services and monetary
 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance for implementation on or before January 31,
 2023, to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in rental units formerly
 regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant Protections ordinances
 as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO rental units to restrict
 evictions to those reasons allowed under LAMC Section
 151.09.


 b. Require payment for relocation services and monetary
 relocation assistance or all “No­Fault” eviction and the
 filing of Landlord Declarations of Intent to Evict for “no­
 Fault” reasons in the manner and amounts required
 under LAMC Section 151.09.

 i. Provide that a landlord may offset the tenant’s
 accumulated rental debt against the relocation
 assistance payment due under this section. This
 exception to relocation shall not apply to evictions
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 ii. Provide an amount of relocation assistance or rent
 waiver equal to one month of the tenant's rent that
 was in effect when the owner issued the notice to
 terminate the tenancy if the “No­Fault” eviction
 occurs in a single­family home rental owned by a
 natural person where the landlord owns, in the City
 of Los Angeles, no more than four units of
 residential property and a single­family home on a
 separate lot, inclusive of natural persons who have
 their properties in a trust.


 c. Require written notification by landlords to inform tenants
 of their rights at the onset of a tenancy and the posting of
 a Tenant Protections Notification in a common area of
 the rental property in the format prescribed by LAHD.


 d. Allow evictions in order to install a resident manager only
 when an on­site manager is required by law or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 covenant agreement.


 e. Require the filing of notices to terminate tenancies from
 both RSO and non­RSO with the LAHD and report back
 to Council on the evictions, including number of
 evictions, reason, cost of rent, etc.


 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 27
 provisions listed in b.1, c, d., and e. above applicable to
 when an on­site manager is required by law or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 covenant agreement.


 e. Require the filing of notices to terminate tenancies from
 both RSO and non­RSO with the LAHD and report back
 to Council on the evictions, including number of
 evictions, reason, cost of rent, etc.


 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
 provisions listed in b.1, c, d., and e. above applicable to
 units subject to the RSO.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD in collaboration with the City Attorney to
 report back in 30 days on the feasibility of:

 a. Setting a reasonable financial and/or timeliness
 threshold for rental arrearages as the basis of evictions
 due to non­payment of rent.


 b. Options to establish a threshold for relocation
 assistance to tenants for economic displacement.


 4. AUTHORIZE the LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute
 a sole­source contract with BAE Urban Economics for a
 period of one­year, commencing on September 30, 2022
 through September 30, 2023, in an amount not to exceed
 $160,000, to conduct an expedited updated study and
 analysis of staffing resources needed and cost recovery for
 enforcement of expanded eviction protections and tenant anti­
 harassment programs, enhanced relocation assistance, and
 implementation of an eviction filing system.


 5. AUTHORIZE the City Controller to establish Appr Account
 43WC35 ­ Study on Eviction/Relocation under Fund 440/43
 Rent Trust Fund and Fund 41M/43 Systematic Code
 Enforcement Trust Fund, and appropriate from the available
 cash balance, $80,000 for each fund to cover the cost of BAE
 Urban Economics study on eviction, anti­harassment and
 relocation amounting to $160,000, and expend funds upon
 written demand of LAHD General Manager or designee.


 6. INSTRUCT the LAHD to conduct an expedited economic
 study of the formula for setting the RSO annual allowable rent
 increase (as mentioned in Recommendation 5), analyzing, in
 particular, the recent changes in RSO allowable rent increases
 in the California cities, including but not limited to, Oakland,
 Bell Gardens, Antioch, Pomona, Santa Ana, and Oxnard;
 including a review of mandated City fees (i.e. RSO, SCEP,
Tuesday BOS, RecycLA,
 - October LADWP,
 4, 2022 - etc) impacting operating
 PAGE 28expenses
 in rental properties.
 relocation amounting to $160,000, and expend funds upon
 written demand of LAHD General Manager or designee.


 6. INSTRUCT the LAHD to conduct an expedited economic
 study of the formula for setting the RSO annual allowable rent
 increase (as mentioned in Recommendation 5), analyzing, in
 particular, the recent changes in RSO allowable rent increases
 in the California cities, including but not limited to, Oakland,
 Bell Gardens, Antioch, Pomona, Santa Ana, and Oxnard;
 including a review of mandated City fees (i.e. RSO, SCEP,
 BOS, RecycLA, LADWP, etc) impacting operating expenses
 in rental properties.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to provide information on the
 Department website and report back in 30 days on a
 comprehensive outreach campaign to inform tenants,
 landlords and other interested parties about the Los Angeles
 City and County COVID­19 Tenant Protections applicable to
 Los Angeles City residents, with consideration for language
 access, and particular efforts targeted to tenants in areas
 identified as having high vulnerability as discussed in this
 report.


 8. INSTRUCT the Rent Adjustment Commission with the support
 of the LAHD to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to
 implement the provisions in this report.


 9. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft an ordinance to sunset
 the Ordinance No. 186607 effective January 31, 2023 and
 allow landlords to resume annual allowable rent increases for
 RSO rental units 12 months after the expiration of the eviction
 protections, and provide that rent increases foregone during
 the moratorium may not be imposed retroactively.


 10. REQUEST the City Attorney to report back with language that
 would delete LAMC Section 49.99.3 and related sections to
 effectuate that the commercial tenant protections are no longer
 in effect, consistent with the State.


 11. INSTRUCT the LAHD, with assistance from the City Attorney
 as needed, to report back in 60 days on:

 a. Which sums of COVID­19 rental debt or rental arrears
 are consumer debt and which are evictable debt.


 b. What steps would need to be taken by the City or the
 State of California to categorize all COVID­19 rental
 debt or rental arrears as consumer debt.

Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 29
 c. A framework for ensuring that a tenant’s repayment of
 as needed, to report back in 60 days on:

 a. Which sums of COVID­19 rental debt or rental arrears
 are consumer debt and which are evictable debt.


 b. What steps would need to be taken by the City or the
 State of California to categorize all COVID­19 rental
 debt or rental arrears as consumer debt.


 c. A framework for ensuring that a tenant’s repayment of
 COVID­19 rental debt or rental arrears is applied first to
 any evictable portions of debt before application to any
 portions categorized as consumer debt.


 d. Options for the establishment of an ongoing rental
 assistance program.


 e. Report back on the status of the Rental Relief registry,
 the number of pending Ellis Eviction filed during the
 moratorium, and the number of non­corporate single­
 family dwellings used as rental in the City of Los
 Angeles.


 12. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services
 (LAAS) to report on policies and procedures for renters who
 have adopted pets during the emergency order who are in full
 compliance with all LAAS ordinances and regulations
 regarding pets, to retain—rather than relinquish—their
 companions.


 13. D I R E C T t h e L A A S r e p o r t b a c k o n a n d i n c l u d e
 recommendations regarding potential changes to LAMC
 Section 49.99.C to require landlords and building managers to
 make an exception of any pets in violation of a lease that
 predates the emergency order and treat the pet as an
 Emotional Support Animal (ESA) companion animal or
 therapy animal using the guidelines such as those predicated
 by the Federal Fair Housing Act for the rest of their natural
 lives, the duration of the tenancy of the tenants lease, or until
 such time the tenant voluntarily relocates the pet or
 themselves.


 14. DIRECT the LAAS to report back on policies in other
 jurisdictions that educate and regulate adoptions of pets by
 residents who are subject to lease agreements that may
 restrict or prohibit pets in rental properties further reducing
 rates of relinquishment.


Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 30
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no impact to the
 such time the tenant voluntarily relocates the pet or
 themselves.


 14. DIRECT the LAAS to report back on policies in other
 jurisdictions that educate and regulate adoptions of pets by
 residents who are subject to lease agreements that may
 restrict or prohibit pets in rental properties further reducing
 rates of relinquishment.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund through the recommended actions contained in the LAHD
 report dated August 25,2022.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 Against: Echo Park Neighborhood Council



(14) 22­0167­S1
 CD 1 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to increase and obligate funding for the
 Miramar Gold Apartments located at 1434 Miramar Street (Project) in
 Council District 1, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to:


 a. Increase funding for the Project by $2,771,075 from $11,035,075 to
 $13,806,150.


 b. De­obligate funds as noted below:

 Project Name Fund Account Amount
 Third Thyme HOME – 561 43S800 $2,771,075


 c. Obligate funds as noted below:

 Project Name Fund Account Amount
 Miramar Gold HOME – 561 43S800 $2,771,075


 d. Approve the Project's revised unit mix to include 44 non­supportive
 housing units at 60 percent Area Median Income.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Tuesday - October
 Chief Legislative Analyst4,has
 2022 -
 completed PAGE
 a financial analysis of 31
 this report.
 Project Name Fund Account Amount
 Miramar Gold HOME – 561 43S800 $2,771,075


 d. Approve the Project's revised unit mix to include 44 non­supportive
 housing units at 60 percent Area Median Income.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(15) 22­0005­S156
 CD 9 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 811 West 41st Drive (Case No. 606944), Assessor I.D. No.
 5019­003­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 26,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 811 West 41st Drive Case No.
 606944), Assessor I.D. No. 5019­003­015, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(16) 22­0005­S157
 CD 14 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case No. 704798), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5188­014­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 26,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case
 No. 704798), Assessor I.D. No. 5188­014­015, from the REAP.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 32
 property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case No. 704798), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5188­014­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 26,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case
 No. 704798), Assessor I.D. No. 5188­014­015, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(17) 22­1122
 CD 13 MOTION (O’FARRELL ­ MARTINEZ) relative to funding for services to
 support the rental aid program for eligible renters in Council District 13.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $3 million in the AB 1290 Fund
 No. 53P, Account No. 281213 (CD 13 Redevelopment Projects ­
 Services) to the Housing Fund No. 100/43, Account No. 3040
 (Contractual Services), for services to support the rental aid
 program for eligible renters in Council District 13.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Housing Department, with the
 assistance of the City Administrative Officer, to make any
 corrections, clarifications or revisions, including any corrections and
 changes to fund or account numbers to effectuate the intent of this
 Motion; said corrections/clarifications may be made orally,
 electronically or by any other means.



(18) 21­1181­S1
 MOTION (MARTINEZ ­ O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Council District 6 special recognition of #Purple
 Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic Violence Awareness, at
 City Hall on October 20, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 Tuesday City Purposes- Fund No.4,
 October  100/56
 2022 to
 - the General ServicesPAGE
 Fund 33
 No. 100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed) for the Council District 6 special
 MOTION (MARTINEZ ­ O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Council District 6 special recognition of #Purple
 Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic Violence Awareness, at
 City Hall on October 20, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed) for the Council District 6 special
 recognition of #Purple Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic
 Violence Awareness, at City Hall on Thursday, October 20, 2022,
 including the illumination of City Hall.



(19) 12­1549­S23
 CD 3 MOTION (BLUMENFIELD ­ RAMAN) relative to extending the term of
 Contract No. C­134581 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. for
 services associated with a study and assessment of the potential
 economic impact of the potential redevelopment of surface parking lots in
 the vicinity of Reseda Boulevard and Sherman Way in Council District 3.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer to prepare, process and
 execute any documents necessary to extend through June 30, 2023, the
 term of City Contract No. C­134581 with Economic and Planning
 Systems, Inc., for services associated with a study and assessment of the
 potential economic impact of the potential redevelopment of surface
 parking lots in the vicinity of Reseda Boulevard and Sherman Way in
 Council District 3 (Council file No. 12­1549).



(20) 22­0433­S1
 MOTION (RODRIGUEZ ­ HARRIS­DAWSON) for services in connection
 with the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on
 October 8, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No.100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with
 the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on October
 8, 2022, at City Hall, including the illumination of City Hall.



(21) 22­1124
 Tuesday
 CD 11 -
 MOTION (BONINOctober 4,
 ­ 2022 - relative to asserting PAGE
 BUSCAINO) 34 over the
 jurisdiction
 September 7, 2022 West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No.100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with
 the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on October
 8, 2022, at City Hall, including the illumination of City Hall.



(21) 22­1124
 CD 11 MOTION (BONIN ­ BUSCAINO) relative to asserting jurisdiction over the
 September 7, 2022 West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission
 (WLAAPC) action in denying an appeal of various building permits issued
 for the project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ASSERT jurisdiction, pursuant to City Charter Section 245, over the
 September 7, 2022 (Letter of Determination date: September 23,
 2022) WLAAPC action to deny the appeal and sustain the
 Director's Determination which denied an appeal to the Director of
 Planning alleging that the Los Angeles Department of Building and
 Safety (LADBS) erred and abused its discretion when issuing
 building permits in the matter of Case Number DIR­2021­8570­
 BSA­lA for the project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.


 2. VETO, upon assertion of jurisdiction, the above described action of
 the WLAAPC and REMAND the matter to this Commission for
 reconsideration.


 3. INSTRUCT the LADBS, in consultation with the Department of City
 Planning and any other relevant departments, to prepare a report
 within 21 days that thoroughly reviews of the applicability of Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 C.22 to the subject
 property, provides an alternate calculation of lot width pursuant to the
 methodology outlined in LAMC Section 12.22 C.22, and outlines
 how this alternate calculation for lot width may impact the proposed
 project in relation to the allowable residential floor area bonus
 [LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(b)(3)], particularly via the cumulative
 side yard setbacks option [LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(b)(3)(iii)], and
 any other relevant sections of the LAMC should it be applied.


 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022)


 10 VOTES REQUIRED


 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 35
(22) 21­1260
 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022)


 10 VOTES REQUIRED



(22) 21­1260
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR relative to the re­exemption of one
 Principal Project Coordinator (Class Code 9134) position for the
 Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) pursuant to
 Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the exemption of one Principal Project Coordinator (Class
 Code 9134) position for the EWDD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 fiscal analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 19, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 19, 2022)


 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)


(23) 22­1112
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KORETZ for KREKORIAN –
 O’FARRELL) relative to the acceptance of grant funding for TUMO Center
 for Creative Technologies (TUMO).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Controller to create a new interest­bearing special
 fund, entitled “Grants and Awards”, Fund No. XXX/10, for the receipt
 of the $9 million grant award from the California State Library
 Department and create an appropriation account entitled, “TUMO
 Center Project”.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 36
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Controller to create a new interest­bearing special
 fund, entitled “Grants and Awards”, Fund No. XXX/10, for the receipt
 of the $9 million grant award from the California State Library
 Department and create an appropriation account entitled, “TUMO
 Center Project”.


 2. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO), or designee, to:

 a. Accept the $9 million in funding designated in the 2021­22
 State Budget for the TUMO Center Project.


 b. Deposit these funds into the new Grants and Awards Fund
 No., XXX/10, and appropriate these funds into the TUMO
 Center Project Account.


 c. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement and expend the
 funds for the purchase of property acquisition consistent with
 the grant agreement with the State of California for said
 funding.


 3. If State grant funds or the Community Development Block Grant
 (CDBG) funds are not actually transferred in order to be available to
 meet the close of escrow deadline, APPROVE a Reserve Fund
 Loan in the amount of $10 million to finance the site acquisition
 associated with the TUMO Center Project; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to:
 a. Transfer up to $10 million from the Reserve Fund to the
 Unappropriated Balance Fund No. 100/58 and appropriate
 therefrom to the TUMO Center Project Account within the
 Grants and Awards Fund No. XXX/10, upon written
 communication from the CAO.


 b. Upon receipt of grant funds, instruct the CAO to transfer said
 funds to reimburse the Reserve Fund Loan.


 4. AUTHORIZE the CAO, or designee, to prepare any necessary
 Controller instructions and make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the
 intent of the Motion, including any corrections and changes to fund or
 account numbers.



 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 37
 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 4. AUTHORIZE the CAO, or designee, to prepare any necessary
 Controller instructions and make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the
 intent of the Motion, including any corrections and changes to fund or
 account numbers.



 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)



(24) 21­0112
 COMMUNICATION FROM CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO)
 relative to recommendations for the State of California Department of
 Housing and Community Development Homekey Program Rounds 2 and
 Round 3, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. RESCIND the Council action on July 7, 2022 for Recommendations
 8 through 11, and 14 included in the CAO report, dated June 17,
 2022, attached to Council file No. 21­0112, related to the State of
 California Department of Housing and Community Development’s
 Homekey Program, Round 2 (Homekey 2), inasmuch as the
 recommendations in this report will replace the previously approved
 action.


 2. APPROVE the use of up to $50,000,000 in Proposition HHH
 General Obligation (Proposition HHH) bond proceeds in the
 Proposition HHH Construction Fund No. 17E, to serve as a
 revolving loan for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program
 (HOME) – American Rescue Plan (ARP) Fund No. 65M, for a
 period from October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, to
 provide cash flow in order to close the acquisitions of approved
 Homekey 2 project sites. This loan will be repaid from the HOME­
 ARP Fund.


 3. DIRECT the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD), or designee, to ensure the Proposition HHH revolving loan
 is fully repaid no later than January 13, 2023.


 4. APPROVE the use of up to $13,328,982 in uncommitted
 Proposition HHH bond proceeds for the acquisition of Homekey
 projects and to close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 38
 5. APPROVE the use of up to $2,822,481 in HOME­ARP funds to
 3. DIRECT the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD), or designee, to ensure the Proposition HHH revolving loan
 is fully repaid no later than January 13, 2023.


 4. APPROVE the use of up to $13,328,982 in uncommitted
 Proposition HHH bond proceeds for the acquisition of Homekey
 projects and to close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.


 5. APPROVE the use of up to $2,822,481 in HOME­ARP funds to
 close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.


 6. APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2020­2021 HHH Project Expenditure
 Plan to be amended and increased by $16,151,463, for a new total
 of $20,132,519, for the 21121 Vanowen project.


 7. RESERVE $79.8 million from the following sources for Homekey
 Round 3.

 Funding Source Amount
 HOME­ARP $17,177,519
 Homeless Housing, Assistance and
 Prevention Program (HHAP) 2, Youth 3,263,400
 Set­Aside
 HHAP­3, Youth Set­Aside 14,364,000
 HHAP­3, Permanent Supportive
 15,000,000
 Housing Set­Aside
 State SB 2 Permanent Local Housing
 20,000,000
 Allocation Grant
 HOME Program Income 10,000,000
 Total*: $79,804,919

 *Total reflects releasing the $30 million from the Additional
 Homeless Services line item in the 2022­23 Adopted Budget
 General City Purposes Fund previously reserved for the
 Homekey Program on July 7, 2022 and other revisions
 discussed further in the CAO report.


 8. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Establish a new appropriation Account No. 43WC48,
 Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund Loan, within the HCID General
 Fund Program Fund No. 10A, and increase appropriations, on
 an as­needed basis utilizing Reserve Fund loan draw request
 amounts, as authorized under C.F. 21­0112, for a net total
 amount not to exceed $48,532,773.75.


Tuesday b. - October
 Revise the 4, 2022 - account of the September
 depositing PAGE 3923, 2022
 Reserve Fund loan transfer in the amount of $322,729 from
 8. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Establish a new appropriation Account No. 43WC48,
 Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund Loan, within the HCID General
 Fund Program Fund No. 10A, and increase appropriations, on
 an as­needed basis utilizing Reserve Fund loan draw request
 amounts, as authorized under C.F. 21­0112, for a net total
 amount not to exceed $48,532,773.75.


 b. Revise the depositing account of the September 23, 2022
 Reserve Fund loan transfer in the amount of $322,729 from
 the State Homekey Fund No. 65L, Account No. 43VC01,
 Homekey Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund
 No. 10A, Account No. 43WC48, Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund
 Loan.


 c. Transfer the expenditure for the 20205 Ventura Woodland Hills
 acquisition in the amount of $322,729 from the State
 Homekey Fund No. 65L, Account No. 43VC01, Homekey
 Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund No. 10A,
 Account No. 43WC48, Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund Loan.


 d. Establish a new appropriation Account No. 43WC49, 21121
 Vanowen within the Proposition HHH Construction Fund No.
 17G and appropriate funding in the amount of $20,132,519 for
 21121 Vanowen.


 9. DIRECT the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to:

 a. Work in consultation with owner/operator selected for each
 Homekey 2 site to develop an approved strategy for lease­up,
 affirmative marketing plan, and tenant selection criteria that
 prioritizes people experiencing homelessness with
 Emergency Housing Vouchers, or other homeless program
 vouchers, and request that the LAHD report on the occupancy
 of units once the projects are 85 percent occupied, and again
 after the adaptability and accessibility units are rehabilitated
 and the projects are 100 percent occupied.


 b. Issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that will select
 qualified developers and operators for potential Homekey 3
 sites to serve as owner/operators, and/or joint applicants with
 the City to acquire potential Homekey sites, and/or developers
 of innovative housing modes, and report back to the Council
 on the recommended qualified list.


 10. AUTHORIZE the CAO and/or the General Manager, LAHD, or
 designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any technical
 corrections as necessary to the transactions included in the
Tuesday CAO report to implement
 - October  4, 2022the
 - intent of those transactions,
 PAGE 40subject to
 the approval of the CAO; and, request the Controller to implement
 qualified developers and operators for potential Homekey 3
 sites to serve as owner/operators, and/or joint applicants with
 the City to acquire potential Homekey sites, and/or developers
 of innovative housing modes, and report back to the Council
 on the recommended qualified list.


 10. AUTHORIZE the CAO and/or the General Manager, LAHD, or
 designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any technical
 corrections as necessary to the transactions included in the
 CAO report to implement the intent of those transactions, subject to
 the approval of the CAO; and, request the Controller to implement
 those instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no additional
 impact to the General Fund. The additional funding sources identified for
 the Homekey Program are either Proposition HHH General Obligation
 bond proceeds, or State or Federal grants.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 actions comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Homelessness and Poverty Committee and Ad Hoc Committee on
 COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment waived
 consideration of the above matter)




Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 41
Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000).




 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 42

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Tuesday, October 4, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)
 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)
Roll Call

Members Present: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (11); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Koretz, Rodriguez (4)

Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items Noticed for Public Hearing ­ PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED

(1) 22­0964
 CD 13 HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of
 Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off­
 site consumption at Mother's California Market, located at 6677 West
 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 105­109.

 Applicant: Mother's Market & Kitchen, Inc.
 Representative: Dan Kramer, Dan Kramer Law Group


 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ NOVEMBER 17, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 9, 2022)


 (Motion required for Findings and Council recommendations for
 the above application)


 Continued Item to October 11, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell,
 Tuesday Price Jr., Raman (11);- October
 Nays: (0);
 4, Absent:
 2022 - Bonin, Harris­Dawson,
 PAGE Koretz,
 1
 Rodriguez (4)
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ NOVEMBER 9, 2022)


 (Motion required for Findings and Council recommendations for
 the above application)


 Continued Item to October 11, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Koretz,
 Rodriguez (4)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(2) 11­1189
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the re­exemption of one Second Deputy General Manager
 Harbor (Class Code 0807) position for the Harbor Department from the
 Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the re­exemption of one Second Deputy General Manager
 Harbor (Class Code 0807) position for the Harbor Department from the
 Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(3) 22­1057
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the exemption of one Senior Project Coordinator position (Class
 Code 1538) for the City Administrative Officer (CAO) from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 2
 Recommendation for Council action:
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(3) 22­1057
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the exemption of one Senior Project Coordinator position (Class
 Code 1538) for the City Administrative Officer (CAO) from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the exemption of one Senior Project Coordinator position
 (Class Code 1538) for the CAO from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter
 Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the CAO
 nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(4) 22­1059
 PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to the re­exemption of one Assistant Director Bureau of Street
 Services (Class Code 4156) position for the Bureau of Street Services
 (BSS) from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the exemption of one Assistant Director Bureau of Street
 Services (Class Code 4156) position for the BSS from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.


 Tuesday Community - October
 Impact 4, 2022 -
 Statement: None submitted. PAGE 3
 AUTHORIZE the exemption of one Assistant Director Bureau of Street
 Services (Class Code 4156) position for the BSS from the Civil Service
 pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 7, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(5) 21­1497
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497­S1 and 21­1497­S2

 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ERRATUM,
 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
 MONITORING PROGRAM, RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
 QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Vesting
 Tentative Tract Map and Haul Route appeal for the properties located at
 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 – 679 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:​


 1. FIND, that the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC)
 has reviewed and considered the information contained in the EIR
 No. ENV­2016­3691­EIR [State Clearinghouse (SCH) No.
 2018021068], dated December 2020, the Final EIR, dated August
 2021 (676 Mateo Street Project EIR), and Erratum, dated October
 2021, as well as the whole of the administrative record.


 2. CERTIFY the following:

 a. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR has been completed in
 compliance with CEQA.


 b. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR was presented to the
 Advisory Agency as a decision­making body of the lead
 agency.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 4
 2. CERTIFY the following:

 a. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR has been completed in
 compliance with CEQA.


 b. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR was presented to the
 Advisory Agency as a decision­making body of the lead
 agency.


 c. The 676 Mateo Street Project EIR reflects the independent
 judgment and analysis of the lead agency.


 3. ADOPT the following:

 a. The related and prepared 676 Mateo Street Project EIR
 Environmental Findings.


 b. The Statement of Overriding Considerations.


 c. The Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the 676
 Mateo Street Project EIR.


 4. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the LACPC as the Findings of Council.


 5. R E S O L V E T O D E N Y T H E A P P E A L f i l e d b y C R E E D L A
 (Representative: Kendra Hartman, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph &
 Cardozo), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the decision of the LACPC in
 sustaining the Deputy Advisory Agency's determination in certifying
 the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR Environmental Findings,
 Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation
 Monitoring Program prepared for the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR;
 and approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 74550­CN for the
 merger and re­subdivision of eight existing lots into one ground lot
 for commercial and live/work condominium purposes, as shown on
 map stamp­dated September 2, 2020, and a Haul Route for the
 export of approximately 74,500 cubic yards of soil; for the properties
 located at 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679 South
 Imperial Street, subject to Conditions of Approval as modified by the
 PLUM Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA,LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. VTT­74550­CN­2A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 5
 Imperial Street, subject to Conditions of Approval as modified by the
 PLUM Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA,LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. VTT­74550­CN­2A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 12, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 12, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(6) 21­1497­S1
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S2

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and PLANNING AND LAND
 USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an
 appeal filed for a Main Conditional Use Permit and a Site Plan Review for
 the properties located at 668 ​­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679
 South Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 Project was assessed in the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR No.
 ENV­2016­3691­EIR, State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2018021068,
 certified on October 28, 2021; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164,
 no subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration, or Addendum is required
 for approval of the Project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Tuesday Commission (LACPC)
 - October as the
 4, 2022  - Findings of Council. PAGE 6
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 Project was assessed in the 676 Mateo Street Project EIR No.
 ENV­2016­3691­EIR, State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2018021068,
 certified on October 28, 2021; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164,
 no subsequent EIR, Negative Declaration, or Addendum is required
 for approval of the Project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. R E S O L V E T O D E N Y T H E A P P E A L f i l e d b y C R E E D L A
 (Representative: Kendra Hartmann, Adams, Broadwell, Joseph &
 Cardozo) and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC
 in approving a Main Conditional Use Permit for the on­site sale of a
 full­line of alcoholic beverages within four establishments, and a Site
 Plan Review for a project resulting in an increase of 50 or more
 dwelling units; for the demolition of an existing warehouse and
 surface parking lot, and the construction of a 197,355­square­foot
 mixed­use building including 185 live/work units, 23,380 square feet
 of commercial space, and associated parking facilities on a 44,839
 square foot lot, the project also proposes the ability to implement a
 Flexibility Option that would provide the flexibility to increase the
 commercial square footage provided by the project from 23,380
 square feet to 45,873 square feet, which would reduce the overall
 amount of live/work units from 185 to 159, for the properties located
 at 668 ­ 678 South Mateo Street and 669 ­ 679 South Imperial
 Street, subject to Conditions of Approval, as modified by the PLUM
 Committee on September 20, 2022.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, & District Centre­GPA, LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown, LLP
 Case No. CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR­1A
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH No. 2018021068
 Related Case: VTT­74550­CN­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(7) 21­1497­S2
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 7
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S1
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(7) 21­1497­S2
 CD 14 Related to Council file Nos. 21­1497 and 21­1497­S1

 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) and RELATED CALIFORNIA
 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS; PLANNING AND
 LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION, AND
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan
 Amendment (GPA) and a Vesting Zone and Height District Change for the
 properties located at 668­678 South Mateo Street and 669­679 South
 Imperial Street.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:​


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 project was assessed in the 676 Mateo Street Project (Project), EIR
 No. ENV­2016­3691­EIR, S t a t e C l e a r i n g h o u s e ( S C H ) N o .
 2018021068, certified on October 28, 2021; and pursuant to CEQA
 Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent EIR,
 Negative Declaration, or Addendum is required for approval of the
 Project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the
 Mayor and the LACPC, approving the GPA to the Central City North
 Community Plan, to change the land use designation from Heavy
 Industrial to Regional.


 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 January 27, 2022, effectuating a Vesting Zone Change and Height
 District Change from M3­1­RIO to (T)(Q)C2­2­RIO, pursuant to Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.32 Q, for the
 demolition of an existing warehouse and surface parking lot, and the
 construction of a 197,355­square­foot mixed­use building including
 185 live/work units, 23,380 square feet of commercial space, and
 associated parking facilities on a 44,839 square foot lot; the Project
 also proposes the ability to implement a Flexibility Option that would
 provide the flexibility to increase the commercial square footage
 Tuesday provided - October 4, 2022from
 by the Project - 23,380 square feet to PAGE 8 square
 45,873
 feet, which would reduce the overall amount of live/work units from
 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 January 27, 2022, effectuating a Vesting Zone Change and Height
 District Change from M3­1­RIO to (T)(Q)C2­2­RIO, pursuant to Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.32 Q, for the
 demolition of an existing warehouse and surface parking lot, and the
 construction of a 197,355­square­foot mixed­use building including
 185 live/work units, 23,380 square feet of commercial space, and
 associated parking facilities on a 44,839 square foot lot; the Project
 also proposes the ability to implement a Flexibility Option that would
 provide the flexibility to increase the commercial square footage
 provided by the Project from 23,380 square feet to 45,873 square
 feet, which would reduce the overall amount of live/work units from
 185 to 159; for the properties located at 668 – 678 South Mateo
 Street and 669 – 679 South Imperial Street, subject to Conditions of
 Approval as modified by the PLUM Committee on September 20,
 2022.


 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General
 Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action.


 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.32 G:

 ...property shall not remain in a Q Qualified classification for more
 than six years unless during that time: (1) there is substantial
 physical development of the property to allow for one or more of
 the uses for which the Q Qualified classification was adopted; or (2)
 if no physical development is necessary, then the property is used
 for one or more of the purposes for which the Q Qualified
 classification was adopted... When these time limitations expire,
 the Q Qualified classification and the authority contained therein
 shall become null and void, the rezoning proceedings shall be
 terminated, and the property thereafter may only be utilized for
 those purposes permitted prior to the commencement of such
 rezoning proceedings.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.



 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee
 Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior
 to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination
 filing.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, and District Centre­GPA, LP
Tuesday - October
 Representative: 4, 2022 - Mayer Brown
 Edgar Khalatian, PAGE 9
 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee
 Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior
 to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination
 filing.


 Applicant: District Centre, LP, and District Centre­GPA, LP
 Representative: Edgar Khalatian, Mayer Brown
 Case No. CPC­2016­3689­GPA­VZC­HD­MCUP­DB­SPR
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2016­3691­EIR; SCH. 2018021068
 Related Case: VTT­74550­CN­1A


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(8) 22­0965
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to drafting ordinances to
 effectuate proposed adjustments to the Board of Police Commissioners
 (BPC) Service Fees for Fiscal Year 2022­23 (FY 22­23).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the proposed adjustments to the BPC Permit Fees for FY 22­
 23; and, REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present the
 appropriate ordinances to effectuate the proposed adjustments to the
 BPC Service Fees for FY 22­23 as recommended in the BPC report
 dated May 24, 2022, contained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO)
 report dated August 22, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22­0965.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the FY 22­23
 BPC Permit Fees are estimated to recover $9,831,882 in staff costs and
 expenses. The proposed fee adjustments reflect an increase to the
 Information Cards, Press Passes and Noise Variance permits. Fees from
 permits will be deposited into Revenue Source Code (RSC) No. 4071
 Police Permits. The False Alarm Fee will be reduced to reflect a
 decrease in support staff from the Office of Finance. False Alarm Fees
 are deposited into RSC No. 4078 Excessive False Alarm Fees. There is
 no additional impact to the General Fund.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 10
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the FY 22­23
 BPC Permit Fees are estimated to recover $9,831,882 in staff costs and
 expenses. The proposed fee adjustments reflect an increase to the
 Information Cards, Press Passes and Noise Variance permits. Fees from
 permits will be deposited into Revenue Source Code (RSC) No. 4071
 Police Permits. The False Alarm Fee will be reduced to reflect a
 decrease in support staff from the Office of Finance. False Alarm Fees
 are deposited into RSC No. 4078 Excessive False Alarm Fees. There is
 no additional impact to the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation
 stated in this report is in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in
 that the proposed fees are based on the full cost of operations and are
 monitored annually to ensure that the rates meet the reasonable cost for
 the services provided.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(9) 20­1168
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to developing a plan to
 increase the number of emergency relief and refuge centers per
 Community Plan Area; identifying resources and strategies to staff such
 facilities; and developing a plan for outreach for and promotion of such
 facilities.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Bonin ­
 Koretz):


 1. INSTRUCT the Emergency Management Department (EMD), in
 coordination with the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO), the Department of Recreation and
 Parks, the Department of General Services, the Library Department,
 the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, the Climate
 Emergency Mobilization Office, the Chief Heat Officer, the Mayor’s
 Office of Public Safety, and other agencies as appropriate, to:

 a. Develop a plan for a significant increase, at least one per
 Community Plan Area, in the number of emergency relief and
 refuge centers.


 b. Provide quarterly reports on all emergency relief related public
 centers (including but not limited to cooling centers, libraries,
 senior centers, community centers, resilience hubs, etc.) as it
 Tuesday - October
 relates 4,usage
 to the 2022 -of these centers as wellPAGE
 as a11
 multi­year
 Emergency Mobilization Office, the Chief Heat Officer, the Mayor’s
 Office of Public Safety, and other agencies as appropriate, to:

 a. Develop a plan for a significant increase, at least one per
 Community Plan Area, in the number of emergency relief and
 refuge centers.


 b. Provide quarterly reports on all emergency relief related public
 centers (including but not limited to cooling centers, libraries,
 senior centers, community centers, resilience hubs, etc.) as it
 relates to the usage of these centers as well as a multi­year
 funding plan to continue public use and its funding. These
 reports should be inclusive of how many centers could be
 considered emergency relief centers, how many participants
 use them, what emergency event precipitated the use of them,
 what services are available and what metrics of success could
 be used to measure them.


 2. INSTRUCT the EMD, the CLA, and the CAO to identify resources
 and strategies to staff such facilities, including potential use of the
 Disaster Service Worker Program, volunteers from organizations
 such as the Red Cross or graduates of the Community Emergency
 Response Team Program, and partnerships with community­based
 organizations, including but not limited to the successful mutual aid
 organizations that have been serving Angelenos during the
 pandemic.


 3. INSTRUCT the EMD, the Information Technology Agency, and other
 agencies as appropriate, to develop a plan for outreach for and
 promotion of such facilities, including but not limited to using the
 Nixle or emergency alert systems, and asking social media
 platforms to geo­target messages or alerts about available
 resources during times of crisis.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(10) 22­1016
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to execute six contracts for the provision of
 Lead Technical Services and Section 106 Historic Preservation Services
 Tuesday for the ongoing operation
 - October of the
 4, 2022 - Lead Hazard Remediation
 PAGE 12 Program
 (LHRP).
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(10) 22­1016
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to execute six contracts for the provision of
 Lead Technical Services and Section 106 Historic Preservation Services
 for the ongoing operation of the Lead Hazard Remediation Program
 (LHRP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to execute
 contracts with the six contractors listed below for the provision of services
 related to the ongoing operation of the LHRP and Section 106 Historic
 Preservation reviews, in substantial conformance with the draft
 agreements attached to the LAHD report dated July 25, 2022 in the
 Council file, with a contract term of one year commencing on or around
 October 1, 2022, with an option to extend for two additional one­year
 terms, and compensation amounts not to exceed the amounts listed below
 for each contractor, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney
 as to form and legality, contractor performance reviews, funding
 availability, and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements:


 a. ACC Environmental Consultants, Inc. for the provision of lead and
 asbestos inspection, survey, and analysis services for a contract
 amount not to exceed $5,000 from the Community Development
 Trust Fund No. 424.


 b. Lead Tech Environmental, Inc. for the provision of lead inspection,
 survey, and analysis services for a contract amount not to exceed
 $5,000 from the Community Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 c. EMSL Analytical, Inc. for the provision of laboratory lead and radon
 testing services for a contract amount not to exceed $10,000 from
 the Community Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 d. Forensic Analytical Consulting Services, as the recipient of a sole­
 source contract for the provision of technical training services, for a
 contract amount not to exceed $50,000 from the LAHD Small Grant
 Funds and Awards Fund No. 49N.


 e. Overland Pacific & Cutler for the provision of relocation services for
 a contract amount not to exceed $35,000 from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 f. ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of Section 106 Historic
 Tuesday - October
 Preservation 4, 2022 for
 Services - a contract amount PAGE
 not 13
 to exceed
 d. Forensic Analytical Consulting Services, as the recipient of a sole­
 source contract for the provision of technical training services, for a
 contract amount not to exceed $50,000 from the LAHD Small Grant
 Funds and Awards Fund No. 49N.


 e. Overland Pacific & Cutler for the provision of relocation services for
 a contract amount not to exceed $35,000 from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424.


 f. ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of Section 106 Historic
 Preservation Services for a contract amount not to exceed
 $100,000 from the HOME Investment Partnership Program Fund
 No. 561 ($80,000) and the Community Development Trust Fund No.
 424 ($20,000). The $20,000 funding from the Community
 Development Trust Fund No. 424 will be split between the
 Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD) and LAHD
 at $10,000 for each City department. The CIFD will engage directly
 with ICF Jones & Stokes, Inc. for the provision of services for
 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funded projects
 requiring environmental clearance review.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for the proposed
 contracts will be provided by the Community Development Trust Fund No.
 424, HOME Investment Partnership Program Fund No. 561, and the
 LAHD Small Grants and Awards Fund No. 49N.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(11) 18­0506­S1
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to
 accepting grant funds to fund the Los Angeles County Criminal Record
 Clearing Project administered by the City Attorney’s Homeless
 Engagement and Response Teams (HEART).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to approve the
 accompanying grant award between the City and the County of Los
 Tuesday Angeles; and, AUTHORIZE
 - October 4, 2022 - the City Attorney, or designee,
 PAGE 14 to
 execute said grant award on behalf of the City, subject to the
 accepting grant funds to fund the Los Angeles County Criminal Record
 Clearing Project administered by the City Attorney’s Homeless
 Engagement and Response Teams (HEART).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to approve the
 accompanying grant award between the City and the County of Los
 Angeles; and, AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to
 execute said grant award on behalf of the City, subject to the
 approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality.


 2. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to accept the grant
 award in the amount of $965,635 for funding the HEART Criminal
 Records Clearance Project for the period of June 19, 2022 to June
 17, 2023.


 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to do the following:

 a. Establish a receivable in the amount of $965,635 within Fund
 No. 368/12.


 b. Establish Appropriation Account No. 12V861 ­ HEART
 Criminal Records Clearance Project within Fund No. 368/12 in
 the amount of $965,635.


 c. Transfer $649,812 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No.
 12V861 ­ HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project to
 Fund No. 100/12, Account No. 001010 Salaries General.


 d. Upon receipt of grant funds and approval of expenses, transfer
 up to $283,188 from Fund No. 368/12, Account No. 12V861 ­
 HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project to Fund No.
 100/12, Revenue Source No. 5346­Related Costs
 Reimbursement ­ Grants.


 4. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney to prepare Controller instructions for
 any necessary technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the
 City Administrative Officer.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Attorney reports that the total cost of the
 Fiscal Year 2022­23 HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project is
 $1,077,947 of which $965,635 will be reimbursed by the County of Los
 Angeles, Public Defenders Department. The General fund contribution is
 $112,312 in related costs (CAP 41) which are already included in the
 2022­23 City budget.
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 15
 any necessary technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the
 City Administrative Officer.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Attorney reports that the total cost of the
 Fiscal Year 2022­23 HEART Criminal Records Clearance Project is
 $1,077,947 of which $965,635 will be reimbursed by the County of Los
 Angeles, Public Defenders Department. The General fund contribution is
 $112,312 in related costs (CAP 41) which are already included in the
 2022­23 City budget.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(12) 20­1524­S5
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to
 funding for the continuation of the YMCA Shower Program.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (De León ­
 Harris­Dawson), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:


 1. APPROVE up to $733,627 from Homeless Housing, Assistance,
 and Prevention Grant Program Round 2 Fund No. 64J/10, Account
 No. 10V773, Funding Category 3 ­ Street Strategy, Outreach, Public
 Health, and Hygiene to the Bureau of Sanitation, Fund No. 100/82,
 Account No. 003040 for the continuation of the YMCA Shower
 program from July 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023, in various
 Council Districts.


 2. AUTHORIZE City Administrative Officer (CAO) to prepare Controller
 instructions or make any necessary technical adjustments consistent
 with the intent of these transactions; and, AUTHORIZE the Controller
 to implement these instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 16
(13) 21­0042­S3
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)

(13) 21­0042­S3
 HOUSING and AD HOC ON COVID­19 RECOVERY AND
 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT COMMITTEES’ REPORTS relative to
 the City’s eviction moratorium during the COVID­19 pandemic, Emergency
 Rental Assistance Program, tenant protections, and related matters.

 A. HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT

 SUBMITS WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION the following
 recommendations of the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD),
 SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the Los
 Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), to draft an Ordinance
 to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the Los Angeles Municipal
 Code (LAMC) to:

 a. Sunset LAMC Sections 49.99.2.A (non­payment of rent)
 effective December 31, 2022, except that:

 i. Effective November 1, 2022 through December
 31, 2022, tenants who are unable to pay rent, due
 to COVID­19 financial impact, will have continued
 eviction protection only if they provide their
 landlord a self­attestation notice under penalty of
 perjury in the format prescribed by the LAHD,
 within 7 days after rent is due.


 b. Sunset LAMC Sections 49.99.2.B (no­fault evictions),
 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets and additional tenants),
 and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal ­ Ellis)
 effective December 31, 2022, except that:

 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
 upon the effective date of the Ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in
 LAMC Section 151.09.


 ii. Provide that noncompliance and related inspection
 Tuesday - Octoberfees imposed
 4, 2022  - between MarchPAGE 4, 17
 2020 and
 December 31, 2022, due to a landlord’s inability to
 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
 upon the effective date of the Ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in
 LAMC Section 151.09.


 ii. Provide that noncompliance and related inspection
 fees imposed between March 4, 2020 and
 December 31, 2022, due to a landlord’s inability to
 comply with a Government Order to Vacate as a
 result of the City’s COVID­19 eviction moratorium
 shall be waived by both the LAHD and Los
 Angeles Department of Building and Safety
 (LADBS).


 iii. Evictions in order to install a resident manager
 shall be allowed only when an on­site manager is
 required by law or in order to comply with the terms
 of an affordable housing covenant agreement.


 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove Rent Stabilization Ordinance
 (RSO) rental units from the rental market cannot be
 enforced until 60 days after the expiration of the
 eviction moratorium (60 days after December 31,
 2022).


 c. Provide that tenants must repay “COVID­19 rental debt”
 as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.02(c) (rental arrears accrued from March 1, 2020
 through September 30, 2021), by August 1, 2023, in
 accordance with State law, California Code of Civil
 Procedure 1179.05(a)(2)(B) and (C).


 d. Provide that tenants must repay rental arrears
 accumulated for rent due from October 1, 2021 through
 December 31, 2022, due to COVID­19 financial impact
 by December 31, 2023.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the LAHD,
 to draft an Ordinance to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in
 rental units formerly regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant
 Protections Ordinances as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO multi­family rental
 units; as well as rentals in corporate­owned single­family
 homes and condominiums subject to California Civil
Tuesday Code 4,
 - October Section
 2022 - 1946.2, to restrict evictions
 PAGE 18 to those
 reasons allowed under LAMC Section 151.09.
 by December 31, 2023.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of the LAHD,
 to draft an Ordinance to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in
 rental units formerly regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant
 Protections Ordinances as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO multi­family rental
 units; as well as rentals in corporate­owned single­family
 homes and condominiums subject to California Civil
 Code Section 1946.2, to restrict evictions to those
 reasons allowed under LAMC Section 151.09.


 b. Require payment for relocation services and monetary
 relocation assistance or all “No­Fault” eviction and the
 filing of Landlord Declarations of Intent to Evict for “no­
 Fault” reasons in the manner and amounts required
 under LAMC Section 151.09.
 i. Provide that a landlord may offset the tenant’s
 accumulated rental debt against the relocation
 assistance payment due under this Section. This
 exception to relocation shall not apply to evictions
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with the LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 c. Require written notification by landlords to inform tenants
 of their rights at the onset of a tenancy and the posting of
 a Tenant Protections Notification in a common area of
 the rental property in the format prescribed by the LAHD.


 d. Allow evictions in order to install a resident manager only
 when an on­site manager is required by law or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 covenant agreement.


 e. Require the filing of notices to terminate tenancies from
 both RSO and non­RSO multi­family rental units and
 corporate­owned single­family homes and
 condominiums with the LAHD.


 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
 provisions listed in the above Recommendation Nos.
 2.b.i, 2.c, 2.d, and 2.e applicable to units subject to the
 RSO.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD, in collaboration with the City Attorney,
 to report back in 30 days on the feasibility of the following:

 a. Setting a reasonable financial and/or timeliness
Tuesday threshold
 - October for rental
 4, 2022  - arrearages as thePAGE
 basis 19
 of evictions
 due to non­payment of rent.
 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
 provisions listed in the above Recommendation Nos.
 2.b.i, 2.c, 2.d, and 2.e applicable to units subject to the
 RSO.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD, in collaboration with the City Attorney,
 to report back in 30 days on the feasibility of the following:

 a. Setting a reasonable financial and/or timeliness
 threshold for rental arrearages as the basis of evictions
 due to non­payment of rent.


 b. Requiring the payment of relocation assistance to
 tenants economically displaced when a landlord
 increases the rent by more than 10 percent in a 12­
 month period.


 4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to
 negotiate and execute a sole­source contract with BAE Urban
 Economics for a period of one year, commencing on
 September 30, 2022 through September 30, 2023, in an
 amount not to exceed $160,000, to conduct an expedited
 updated study and analysis of staffing resources needed and
 cost recovery for enforcement of expanded eviction
 protections and tenant anti­harassment programs, enhanced
 relocation assistance, and implementation of an eviction filing
 system.


 5. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish Appropriation Account
 43WC35 – Study on Eviction/Relocation under Fund No.
 440/43 – Rent Trust Fund, and Fund 41M/43 – Systematic
 Code Enforcement Trust Fund, and appropriate from the
 available cash balance, $80,000 for each fund to cover the
 cost of the BAE Urban Economics study on eviction, anti­
 harassment and relocation amounting to $160,000; and,
 expend funds upon written demand of the General Manager,
 LAHD, or designee.


 6. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst, together with the
 LAHD, LADBS, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
 (LADWP), and other City departments as needed, to conduct
 a review of mandated City fees [including RSO, Systematic
 Code Enforcement Program (SCEP), Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS), RecycLA, LADWP] impacting operating expenses in
 rental properties; and, instruct the LAHD to incorporate the
 findings on the study on the RSO annual allowable increase
 described in the above Recommendation No. 5.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to provide information on the LAHD
 website and conduct a comprehensive outreach campaign to
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 20
 inform tenants, landlords, and other interested parties about
 (LADWP), and other City departments as needed, to conduct
 a review of mandated City fees [including RSO, Systematic
 Code Enforcement Program (SCEP), Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS), RecycLA, LADWP] impacting operating expenses in
 rental properties; and, instruct the LAHD to incorporate the
 findings on the study on the RSO annual allowable increase
 described in the above Recommendation No. 5.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to provide information on the LAHD
 website and conduct a comprehensive outreach campaign to
 inform tenants, landlords, and other interested parties about
 the City and County of Los Angeles COVID­19 Tenant
 Protections applicable to City of Los Angeles residents, with
 particular efforts targeted to tenants in areas identified as
 having high vulnerability, as discussed in the LAHD report,
 dated August 25, 2022, attached to the Council file.


 8. REQUEST the Rent Adjustment Commission, with the support
 of the LAHD, to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to
 implement the provisions in said LAHD report.


 B. A D H O C C O M M I T T E E O N C O V I D ­ 1 9 R E C O V E R Y A N D
 NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT REPORT

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE
 APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the
 LAMC to:

 a. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.A (non­payment of rent)
 effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 i. Effective December 1, 2022 through January 31,
 2023, tenants who are unable to pay rent, due to
 COVID­19 financial impact, will have continued
 eviction protection only if the Tenant has provided
 notice to the Landlord of their inability to pay rent
 due to Financial Impacts Related to COVID­19,
 within seven (7) days after the date that the rent
 was due.


 b. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.B (no­fault evictions),
 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets and additional tenants),
 and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal ­ Ellis) of
 the LAMC effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
Tuesday - Octoberu4,p o2022
 n t h-e e f f e c t i v e d a t e o fPAGE
 t h e o21
 rdinance
 was due.


 b. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.B (no­fault evictions),
 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets and additional tenants),
 and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal ­ Ellis) of
 the LAMC effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 i. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a
 Government Agency Order that requires the rental
 unit to be vacated, shall be allowed immediately
 upon the effective date of the ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in
 LAMC Section 151.09.


 ii. Provide that noncompliance and related inspection
 fees imposed between March 4, 2020 and
 January 31, 2023, due to a landlord’s inability to
 comply with a Government Order to Vacate as a
 result of the City’s COVID­19 eviction moratorium
 shall be waived by both LAHD and LADBS.


 iii. Evictions in order to install a resident manager
 shall be allowed only when an on­site manager is
 required by law or in order to comply with the terms
 of an affordable housing covenant agreement.


 iv. Provide that evictions in order to demolish or
 permanently remove RSO rental units from the
 rental market cannot be enforced until 60 days
 after the expiration of the eviction moratorium (60
 days after January 31, 2023).


 v. REQUEST the City Attorney to include a new
 provision that RSO tenants whose no­fault
 evictions were paused due to the eviction
 moratorium under 49.99.2.B and who continue to
 reside in their units be provided with a minimum
 60­day notice and an opportunity to refile an
 appeal of the relocation amount due to them
 based on a change in disability status that affects
 the tenant’s qualification for a higher relocation
 payment.


 vi. Provide that no­fault evictions for unauthorized
 pets and/or tenants can be enforced only after
 January 31, 2024 and after the landlord has
 provided a 30 day notice for the tenant to remedy
 the situation.


Tuesday -c.October
 Provide4,that
 2022tenants
 - must repay “COVID­19
 PAGE 22rental debt”
 as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
 the tenant’s qualification for a higher relocation
 payment.


 vi. Provide that no­fault evictions for unauthorized
 pets and/or tenants can be enforced only after
 January 31, 2024 and after the landlord has
 provided a 30 day notice for the tenant to remedy
 the situation.


 c. Provide that tenants must repay “COVID­19 rental debt”
 as defined in California Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.02(c) (rental arrears accrued from March 1, 2020
 through September 30, 2021), by August 1, 2023, in
 accordance with State law, Code of Civil Procedure
 1179.05(a)(2)(B) and (C).


 d. Provide that tenants must repay rental arrears
 accumulated for rent due from October 1, 2021 through
 January 31, 2023, due to COVID­19 financial impact by
 February 1, 2024.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to
 draft an ordinance for implementation on or before January 31,
 2023, to regulate evictions (Just Cause) in rental units formerly
 regulated under the COVID­19 Tenant Protections ordinances
 as follows:

 a. Regulate evictions on all non­RSO rental units to restrict
 evictions to those reasons allowed under LAMC Section
 151.09.


 b. Require payment for relocation services and monetary
 relocation assistance or all “No­Fault” eviction and the
 filing of Landlord Declarations of Intent to Evict for “no­
 Fault” reasons in the manner and amounts required
 under LAMC Section 151.09.

 i. Provide that a landlord may offset the tenant’s
 accumulated rental debt against the relocation
 assistance payment due under this section. This
 exception to relocation shall not apply to evictions
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 ii. Provide an amount of relocation assistance or rent
 waiver equal to one month of the tenant's rent that
 was in effect when the owner issued the notice to
 terminate the tenancy if the “No­Fault” eviction
 occurs in a single­family home rental owned by a
 natural person where the landlord owns, in the City
Tuesday - Octoberof4, Los
 2022 -
 Angeles, no more than PAGE 23 units of
 four
 residential property and a single­family home on a
 exception to relocation shall not apply to evictions
 for unpermitted units as they are not registered
 with LAHD and cannot legally collect rent.


 ii. Provide an amount of relocation assistance or rent
 waiver equal to one month of the tenant's rent that
 was in effect when the owner issued the notice to
 terminate the tenancy if the “No­Fault” eviction
 occurs in a single­family home rental owned by a
 natural person where the landlord owns, in the City
 of Los Angeles, no more than four units of
 residential property and a single­family home on a
 separate lot, inclusive of natural persons who have
 their properties in a trust.


 c. Require written notification by landlords to inform tenants
 of their rights at the onset of a tenancy and the posting of
 a Tenant Protections Notification in a common area of
 the rental property in the format prescribed by LAHD.


 d. Allow evictions in order to install a resident manager only
 when an on­site manager is required by law or in order
 to comply with the terms of an affordable housing
 covenant agreement.


 e. Require the filing of notices to terminate tenancies from
 both RSO and non­RSO with the LAHD and report back
 to Council on the evictions, including number of
 evictions, reason, cost of rent, etc.


 f. Amend Chapter XV of the LAMC (the RSO) to make the
 provisions listed in b.1, c, d., and e. above applicable to
 units subject to the RSO.


 3. INSTRUCT the LAHD in collaboration with the City Attorney to
 report back in 30 days on the feasibility of:

 a. Setting a reasonable financial and/or timeliness
 threshold for rental arrearages as the basis of evictions
 due to non­payment of rent.


 b. Options to establish a threshold for relocation
 assistance to tenants for economic displacement.


 4. AUTHORIZE the LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute
 a sole­source contract with BAE Urban Economics for a
 period of one­year, commencing on September 30, 2022
 through September 30, 2023, in an amount not to exceed
 $160,000, to conduct an expedited updated study and
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 24
 analysis of staffing resources needed and cost recovery for
 b. Options to establish a threshold for relocation
 assistance to tenants for economic displacement.


 4. AUTHORIZE the LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute
 a sole­source contract with BAE Urban Economics for a
 period of one­year, commencing on September 30, 2022
 through September 30, 2023, in an amount not to exceed
 $160,000, to conduct an expedited updated study and
 analysis of staffing resources needed and cost recovery for
 enforcement of expanded eviction protections and tenant anti­
 harassment programs, enhanced relocation assistance, and
 implementation of an eviction filing system.


 5. AUTHORIZE the City Controller to establish Appr Account
 43WC35 ­ Study on Eviction/Relocation under Fund 440/43
 Rent Trust Fund and Fund 41M/43 Systematic Code
 Enforcement Trust Fund, and appropriate from the available
 cash balance, $80,000 for each fund to cover the cost of BAE
 Urban Economics study on eviction, anti­harassment and
 relocation amounting to $160,000, and expend funds upon
 written demand of LAHD General Manager or designee.


 6. INSTRUCT the LAHD to conduct an expedited economic
 study of the formula for setting the RSO annual allowable rent
 increase (as mentioned in Recommendation 5), analyzing, in
 particular, the recent changes in RSO allowable rent increases
 in the California cities, including but not limited to, Oakland,
 Bell Gardens, Antioch, Pomona, Santa Ana, and Oxnard;
 including a review of mandated City fees (i.e. RSO, SCEP,
 BOS, RecycLA, LADWP, etc) impacting operating expenses
 in rental properties.


 7. INSTRUCT the LAHD to provide information on the
 Department website and report back in 30 days on a
 comprehensive outreach campaign to inform tenants,
 landlords and other interested parties about the Los Angeles
 City and County COVID­19 Tenant Protections applicable to
 Los Angeles City residents, with consideration for language
 access, and particular efforts targeted to tenants in areas
 identified as having high vulnerability as discussed in this
 report.


 8. INSTRUCT the Rent Adjustment Commission with the support
 of the LAHD to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to
 implement the provisions in this report.


 9. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft an ordinance to sunset
 the Ordinance No. 186607 effective January 31, 2023 and
Tuesday - October
 allow 4, 2022
 landlords -
 to resume annual allowablePAGE 25
 rent increases for
 RSO rental units 12 months after the expiration of the eviction
 access, and particular efforts targeted to tenants in areas
 identified as having high vulnerability as discussed in this
 report.


 8. INSTRUCT the Rent Adjustment Commission with the support
 of the LAHD to adopt rules and regulations as necessary to
 implement the provisions in this report.


 9. REQUEST the City Attorney to draft an ordinance to sunset
 the Ordinance No. 186607 effective January 31, 2023 and
 allow landlords to resume annual allowable rent increases for
 RSO rental units 12 months after the expiration of the eviction
 protections, and provide that rent increases foregone during
 the moratorium may not be imposed retroactively.


 10. REQUEST the City Attorney to report back with language that
 would delete LAMC Section 49.99.3 and related sections to
 effectuate that the commercial tenant protections are no longer
 in effect, consistent with the State.


 11. INSTRUCT the LAHD, with assistance from the City Attorney
 as needed, to report back in 60 days on:

 a. Which sums of COVID­19 rental debt or rental arrears
 are consumer debt and which are evictable debt.


 b. What steps would need to be taken by the City or the
 State of California to categorize all COVID­19 rental
 debt or rental arrears as consumer debt.


 c. A framework for ensuring that a tenant’s repayment of
 COVID­19 rental debt or rental arrears is applied first to
 any evictable portions of debt before application to any
 portions categorized as consumer debt.


 d. Options for the establishment of an ongoing rental
 assistance program.


 e. Report back on the status of the Rental Relief registry,
 the number of pending Ellis Eviction filed during the
 moratorium, and the number of non­corporate single­
 family dwellings used as rental in the City of Los
 Angeles.


 12. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services
 (LAAS) to report on policies and procedures for renters who
 have adopted pets during the emergency order who are in full
 compliance with all LAAS ordinances and regulations
Tuesday - October 4,
 regarding 2022
 pets,  to -retain—rather than PAGE 26
 relinquish—their
 companions.
 the number of pending Ellis Eviction filed during the
 moratorium, and the number of non­corporate single­
 family dwellings used as rental in the City of Los
 Angeles.


 12. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Animal Services
 (LAAS) to report on policies and procedures for renters who
 have adopted pets during the emergency order who are in full
 compliance with all LAAS ordinances and regulations
 regarding pets, to retain—rather than relinquish—their
 companions.


 13. D I R E C T t h e L A A S r e p o r t b a c k o n a n d i n c l u d e
 recommendations regarding potential changes to LAMC
 Section 49.99.C to require landlords and building managers to
 make an exception of any pets in violation of a lease that
 predates the emergency order and treat the pet as an
 Emotional Support Animal (ESA) companion animal or
 therapy animal using the guidelines such as those predicated
 by the Federal Fair Housing Act for the rest of their natural
 lives, the duration of the tenancy of the tenants lease, or until
 such time the tenant voluntarily relocates the pet or
 themselves.


 14. DIRECT the LAAS to report back on policies in other
 jurisdictions that educate and regulate adoptions of pets by
 residents who are subject to lease agreements that may
 restrict or prohibit pets in rental properties further reducing
 rates of relinquishment.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LAHD reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund through the recommended actions contained in the LAHD
 report dated August 25,2022.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 Against: Echo Park Neighborhood Council


Failed to Adopt Motion (de León – Raman) to bifurcate Recommendation No. 1 of Ad
Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment Report (Item
13.B), from Recommendation Nos. 2 through 14 of Item 13.B.
Ayes: de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Raman (5); Nays: Blumenfield,
Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Rodriguez (7); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
Price Jr. (3)

Failed to Adopt Motion 13H (Lee – Buscaino)
Ayes: Buscaino, Lee (2); Nays: Blumenfield, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt,
Koretz, Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (10); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian, Price
Jr. (3)
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 27
 Failed to Adopt Motion (de León – Raman) to bifurcate Recommendation No. 1 of Ad
 Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment Report (Item
 13.B), from Recommendation Nos. 2 through 14 of Item 13.B.
 Ayes: de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Raman (5); Nays: Blumenfield,
 Buscaino, Cedillo, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Rodriguez (7); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

 Failed to Adopt Motion 13H (Lee – Buscaino)
 Ayes: Buscaino, Lee (2); Nays: Blumenfield, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt,
 Koretz, Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (10); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian, Price
 Jr. (3)

 Adopted Motion 13G (Cedillo – Buscaino) as Amended by Motion (Cedillo –
 Buscaino) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Rodriguez (9); Nays: Harris­Dawson, Koretz, Raman (3); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

 Adopted Motion 13F (de León – Raman) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Lee,
 Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

 Adopted Motion 13E (Blumenfield – Lee) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: Harris­Dawson (1); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian, Price Jr.
 (3)

 Failed to Adopt Motion 13D (Raman – de León)
 Ayes: de León, Harris­Dawson, O'Farrell, Raman (4); Nays: Blumenfield, Buscaino,
 Cedillo, Hutt, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, Rodriguez (8); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian, Price Jr.
 (3)

 Adopted Motion 13C (Raman – de León) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman (10); Nays: Lee, Rodriguez (2); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

 Final Vote: Adopted Ad Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood
 Investment Report, as Amended by Amended Motion 13G (Cedillo ­ Buscaino),
 Motion 13F (de León ­ Raman), Motion 13E (Blumenfield ­ Lee), and Motion 13C
 (Raman ­ de León)
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Lee,
 Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

(14) 22­0167­S1
 CD 1 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to increase and obligate funding for the
 Miramar Gold Apartments located at 1434 Miramar Street (Project) in
 Council District 1, and related matters.

 Tuesday Recommendations for4,Council
 - October 2022 - action, pursuant to PAGE
 Motion28
 (Cedillo –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Lee,
 Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian,
 Price Jr. (3)

(14) 22­0167­S1
 CD 1 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authorizing the Los Angeles
 Housing Department (LAHD) to increase and obligate funding for the
 Miramar Gold Apartments located at 1434 Miramar Street (Project) in
 Council District 1, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo –
 O’Farrell), SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to:


 a. Increase funding for the Project by $2,771,075 from $11,035,075 to
 $13,806,150.


 b. De­obligate funds as noted below:

 Project Name Fund Account Amount
 Third Thyme HOME – 561 43S800 $2,771,075


 c. Obligate funds as noted below:

 Project Name Fund Account Amount
 Miramar Gold HOME – 561 43S800 $2,771,075


 d. Approve the Project's revised unit mix to include 44 non­supportive
 housing units at 60 percent Area Median Income.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(15) 22­0005­S156
 CD 9 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 29
 property at 811 West 41st Drive (Case No. 606944), Assessor I.D. No.
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (13); Nays: (0); Absent: Bonin, Harris­Dawson
 (2)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(15) 22­0005­S156
 CD 9 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 811 West 41st Drive (Case No. 606944), Assessor I.D. No.
 5019­003­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 26,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 811 West 41st Drive Case No.
 606944), Assessor I.D. No. 5019­003­015, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(16) 22­0005­S157
 CD 14 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case No. 704798), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5188­014­015, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:

 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 26,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case
 No. 704798), Assessor I.D. No. 5188­014­015, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 30
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1004 South Spence Street (Case
 No. 704798), Assessor I.D. No. 5188­014­015, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(17) 22­1122
 CD 13 MOTION (O’FARRELL ­ MARTINEZ) relative to funding for services to
 support the rental aid program for eligible renters in Council District 13.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $3 million in the AB 1290 Fund
 No. 53P, Account No. 281213 (CD 13 Redevelopment Projects ­
 Services) to the Housing Fund No. 100/43, Account No. 3040
 (Contractual Services), for services to support the rental aid
 program for eligible renters in Council District 13.


 2. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Housing Department, with the
 assistance of the City Administrative Officer, to make any
 corrections, clarifications or revisions, including any corrections and
 changes to fund or account numbers to effectuate the intent of this
 Motion; said corrections/clarifications may be made orally,
 electronically or by any other means.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(18) 21­1181­S1
 MOTION (MARTINEZ ­ O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Council District 6 special recognition of #Purple
 Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic Violence Awareness, at
 City Hall on October 20, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 Tuesday THE MAYOR:- October 4, 2022 - PAGE 31
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(18) 21­1181­S1
 MOTION (MARTINEZ ­ O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Council District 6 special recognition of #Purple
 Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic Violence Awareness, at
 City Hall on October 20, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed) for the Council District 6 special
 recognition of #Purple Thursday, the national day of action for Domestic
 Violence Awareness, at City Hall on Thursday, October 20, 2022,
 including the illumination of City Hall.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(19) 12­1549­S23
 CD 3 MOTION (BLUMENFIELD ­ RAMAN) relative to extending the term of
 Contract No. C­134581 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. for
 services associated with a study and assessment of the potential
 economic impact of the potential redevelopment of surface parking lots in
 the vicinity of Reseda Boulevard and Sherman Way in Council District 3.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer to prepare, process and
 execute any documents necessary to extend through June 30, 2023, the
 term of City Contract No. C­134581 with Economic and Planning
 Systems, Inc., for services associated with a study and assessment of the
 potential economic impact of the potential redevelopment of surface
 parking lots in the vicinity of Reseda Boulevard and Sherman Way in
 Council District 3 (Council file No. 12­1549).


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(20) 22­0433­S1
 MOTION (RODRIGUEZ ­ HARRIS­DAWSON) for services in connection
 with the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on
 Tuesday October 8, 2022.
 - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 32
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(20) 22­0433­S1
 MOTION (RODRIGUEZ ­ HARRIS­DAWSON) for services in connection
 with the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on
 October 8, 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council's portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No.100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries­As Needed), for services in connection with
 the Council District 7 special observation of Fallen Firefighters on October
 8, 2022, at City Hall, including the illumination of City Hall.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(21) 22­1124
 CD 11 MOTION (BONIN ­ BUSCAINO) relative to asserting jurisdiction over the
 September 7, 2022 West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission
 (WLAAPC) action in denying an appeal of various building permits issued
 for the project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. ASSERT jurisdiction, pursuant to City Charter Section 245, over the
 September 7, 2022 (Letter of Determination date: September 23,
 2022) WLAAPC action to deny the appeal and sustain the
 Director's Determination which denied an appeal to the Director of
 Planning alleging that the Los Angeles Department of Building and
 Safety (LADBS) erred and abused its discretion when issuing
 building permits in the matter of Case Number DIR­2021­8570­
 BSA­lA for the project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.


 2. VETO, upon assertion of jurisdiction, the above described action of
 the WLAAPC and REMAND the matter to this Commission for
 reconsideration.


 3. INSTRUCT the LADBS, in consultation with the Department of City
 Planning and any other relevant departments, to prepare a report
 Tuesday - days
 within 21October 4, 2022
 that -
 thoroughly reviews of the PAGE  33 of Los
 applicability
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 C.22 to the subject
 building permits in the matter of Case Number DIR­2021­8570­
 BSA­lA for the project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.


 2. VETO, upon assertion of jurisdiction, the above described action of
 the WLAAPC and REMAND the matter to this Commission for
 reconsideration.


 3. INSTRUCT the LADBS, in consultation with the Department of City
 Planning and any other relevant departments, to prepare a report
 within 21 days that thoroughly reviews of the applicability of Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 C.22 to the subject
 property, provides an alternate calculation of lot width pursuant to the
 methodology outlined in LAMC Section 12.22 C.22, and outlines
 how this alternate calculation for lot width may impact the proposed
 project in relation to the allowable residential floor area bonus
 [LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(b)(3)], particularly via the cumulative
 side yard setbacks option [LAMC Section 12.21 C.10(b)(3)(iii)], and
 any other relevant sections of the LAMC should it be applied.


 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 11, 2022)


 10 VOTES REQUIRED


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(22) 21­1260
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE MAYOR relative to the re­exemption of one
 Principal Project Coordinator (Class Code 9134) position for the
 Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) pursuant to
 Charter Section 1001(b).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the exemption of one Principal Project Coordinator (Class
 Code 9134) position for the EWDD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 fiscal analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 34
 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 19, 2022
 APPROVE the exemption of one Principal Project Coordinator (Class
 Code 9134) position for the EWDD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(b).


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Mayor. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 fiscal analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 19, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 19, 2022)


 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(23) 22­1112
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KORETZ for KREKORIAN –
 O’FARRELL) relative to the acceptance of grant funding for TUMO Center
 for Creative Technologies (TUMO).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Controller to create a new interest­bearing special
 fund, entitled “Grants and Awards”, Fund No. XXX/10, for the receipt
 of the $9 million grant award from the California State Library
 Department and create an appropriation account entitled, “TUMO
 Center Project”.


 2. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO), or designee, to:

 a. Accept the $9 million in funding designated in the 2021­22
 State Budget for the TUMO Center Project.


 b. Deposit these funds into the new Grants and Awards Fund
 No., XXX/10, and appropriate these funds into the TUMO
 Center Project Account.


 c. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement and expend the
 funds for the purchase of property acquisition consistent with
 Tuesday - grant
 the October 4, 2022 - with the State of PAGE
 agreement 35 for said
 California
 funding.
 a. Accept the $9 million in funding designated in the 2021­22
 State Budget for the TUMO Center Project.


 b. Deposit these funds into the new Grants and Awards Fund
 No., XXX/10, and appropriate these funds into the TUMO
 Center Project Account.


 c. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement and expend the
 funds for the purchase of property acquisition consistent with
 the grant agreement with the State of California for said
 funding.


 3. If State grant funds or the Community Development Block Grant
 (CDBG) funds are not actually transferred in order to be available to
 meet the close of escrow deadline, APPROVE a Reserve Fund
 Loan in the amount of $10 million to finance the site acquisition
 associated with the TUMO Center Project; and, AUTHORIZE the
 Controller to:
 a. Transfer up to $10 million from the Reserve Fund to the
 Unappropriated Balance Fund No. 100/58 and appropriate
 therefrom to the TUMO Center Project Account within the
 Grants and Awards Fund No. XXX/10, upon written
 communication from the CAO.


 b. Upon receipt of grant funds, instruct the CAO to transfer said
 funds to reimburse the Reserve Fund Loan.


 4. AUTHORIZE the CAO, or designee, to prepare any necessary
 Controller instructions and make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the
 intent of the Motion, including any corrections and changes to fund or
 account numbers.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(24) 21­0112
 COMMUNICATION FROM CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO)
 relative to recommendations for the State of California Department of
 Housing and Community Development Homekey Program Rounds 2 and
 Tuesday - October
 Round 3, and related 4, 2022 -
 matters. PAGE 36
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)

(24) 21­0112
 COMMUNICATION FROM CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO)
 relative to recommendations for the State of California Department of
 Housing and Community Development Homekey Program Rounds 2 and
 Round 3, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. RESCIND the Council action on July 7, 2022 for Recommendations
 8 through 11, and 14 included in the CAO report, dated June 17,
 2022, attached to Council file No. 21­0112, related to the State of
 California Department of Housing and Community Development’s
 Homekey Program, Round 2 (Homekey 2), inasmuch as the
 recommendations in this report will replace the previously approved
 action.


 2. APPROVE the use of up to $50,000,000 in Proposition HHH
 General Obligation (Proposition HHH) bond proceeds in the
 Proposition HHH Construction Fund No. 17E, to serve as a
 revolving loan for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program
 (HOME) – American Rescue Plan (ARP) Fund No. 65M, for a
 period from October 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, to
 provide cash flow in order to close the acquisitions of approved
 Homekey 2 project sites. This loan will be repaid from the HOME­
 ARP Fund.


 3. DIRECT the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD), or designee, to ensure the Proposition HHH revolving loan
 is fully repaid no later than January 13, 2023.


 4. APPROVE the use of up to $13,328,982 in uncommitted
 Proposition HHH bond proceeds for the acquisition of Homekey
 projects and to close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.


 5. APPROVE the use of up to $2,822,481 in HOME­ARP funds to
 close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.


 6. APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2020­2021 HHH Project Expenditure
 Plan to be amended and increased by $16,151,463, for a new total
 of $20,132,519, for the 21121 Vanowen project.


 Tuesday 7. RESERVE $79.8 4,
 - October million
 2022 from
 - the following sources
 PAGEfor37Homekey
 Round 3.
 5. APPROVE the use of up to $2,822,481 in HOME­ARP funds to
 close the remaining gap for Homekey 2.


 6. APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2020­2021 HHH Project Expenditure
 Plan to be amended and increased by $16,151,463, for a new total
 of $20,132,519, for the 21121 Vanowen project.


 7. RESERVE $79.8 million from the following sources for Homekey
 Round 3.

 Funding Source Amount
 HOME­ARP $17,177,519
 Homeless Housing, Assistance and
 Prevention Program (HHAP) 2, Youth 3,263,400
 Set­Aside
 HHAP­3, Youth Set­Aside 14,364,000
 HHAP­3, Permanent Supportive
 15,000,000
 Housing Set­Aside
 State SB 2 Permanent Local Housing
 20,000,000
 Allocation Grant
 HOME Program Income 10,000,000
 Total*: $79,804,919

 *Total reflects releasing the $30 million from the Additional
 Homeless Services line item in the 2022­23 Adopted Budget
 General City Purposes Fund previously reserved for the
 Homekey Program on July 7, 2022 and other revisions
 discussed further in the CAO report.


 8. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Establish a new appropriation Account No. 43WC48,
 Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund Loan, within the HCID General
 Fund Program Fund No. 10A, and increase appropriations, on
 an as­needed basis utilizing Reserve Fund loan draw request
 amounts, as authorized under C.F. 21­0112, for a net total
 amount not to exceed $48,532,773.75.


 b. Revise the depositing account of the September 23, 2022
 Reserve Fund loan transfer in the amount of $322,729 from
 the State Homekey Fund No. 65L, Account No. 43VC01,
 Homekey Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund
 No. 10A, Account No. 43WC48, Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund
 Loan.


 c. Transfer the expenditure for the 20205 Ventura Woodland Hills
 acquisition in the amount of $322,729 from the State
Tuesday - October 4,
 Homekey Fund2022
 No.- 65L, Account No. 43VC01,
 PAGE 38Homekey
 Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund No. 10A,
 b. Revise the depositing account of the September 23, 2022
 Reserve Fund loan transfer in the amount of $322,729 from
 the State Homekey Fund No. 65L, Account No. 43VC01,
 Homekey Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund
 No. 10A, Account No. 43WC48, Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund
 Loan.


 c. Transfer the expenditure for the 20205 Ventura Woodland Hills
 acquisition in the amount of $322,729 from the State
 Homekey Fund No. 65L, Account No. 43VC01, Homekey
 Capital to the HCID General Fund Program Fund No. 10A,
 Account No. 43WC48, Homekey 2.0 Reserve Fund Loan.


 d. Establish a new appropriation Account No. 43WC49, 21121
 Vanowen within the Proposition HHH Construction Fund No.
 17G and appropriate funding in the amount of $20,132,519 for
 21121 Vanowen.


 9. DIRECT the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to:

 a. Work in consultation with owner/operator selected for each
 Homekey 2 site to develop an approved strategy for lease­up,
 affirmative marketing plan, and tenant selection criteria that
 prioritizes people experiencing homelessness with
 Emergency Housing Vouchers, or other homeless program
 vouchers, and request that the LAHD report on the occupancy
 of units once the projects are 85 percent occupied, and again
 after the adaptability and accessibility units are rehabilitated
 and the projects are 100 percent occupied.


 b. Issue a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) that will select
 qualified developers and operators for potential Homekey 3
 sites to serve as owner/operators, and/or joint applicants with
 the City to acquire potential Homekey sites, and/or developers
 of innovative housing modes, and report back to the Council
 on the recommended qualified list.


 10. AUTHORIZE the CAO and/or the General Manager, LAHD, or
 designees, to prepare Controller instructions and any technical
 corrections as necessary to the transactions included in the
 CAO report to implement the intent of those transactions, subject to
 the approval of the CAO; and, request the Controller to implement
 those instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no additional
 impact to the General Fund. The additional funding sources identified for
 the Homekey Program are either Proposition HHH General Obligation
 bond proceeds, or State or Federal grants.
Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 39
 corrections as necessary to the transactions included in the
 CAO report to implement the intent of those transactions, subject to
 the approval of the CAO; and, request the Controller to implement
 those instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no additional
 impact to the General Fund. The additional funding sources identified for
 the Homekey Program are either Proposition HHH General Obligation
 bond proceeds, or State or Federal grants.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 actions comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Homelessness and Poverty Committee and Ad Hoc Committee on
 COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood Investment waived
 consideration of the above matter)


 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz,
 Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Nays: (0);
 Absent: Bonin (1)



Items Called Special

-
Motions for Posting and Referral - SEE ATTACHED


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment



ENDING ROLL CALL
Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Lee, Martinez,
O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (12); Absent: Bonin, Krekorian, Price Jr. (3)



Whereupon the Council did adjourn.

ATTEST: Holly L. Wolcott, CITY CLERK
 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 40
By
ENDING ROLL CALL
Blumenfield, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
O'Farrell, Price Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (14); Absent: Bonin (1)



Whereupon the Council did adjourn.

ATTEST: Holly L. Wolcott, CITY CLERK

By



 Council Clerk PRESIDENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL




 Tuesday - October 4, 2022 - PAGE 41
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
De Leon Blumenfield Gary Leonard
O’Farrell De Leon Los Angeles Filipino
 Association of City
 Employees (LAFACE)
De Leon Buscaino REDACTED

Buscaino Lee Rick J. Caruso
Buscaino Blumenfield Anthony Pirozzi, Jr.
Buscaino Blumenfield Anna Manunza
Buscaino Lee The Matttera Family
Buscaino Lee Christian Guardino
Buscaino Lee Tuberosi Family
 MOTION

I MOVE that Item No. 13 on today's agenda (CF 21-0042-S3) relative to the HOUSING
and AD HOC ON COVID-19 RECOVERY AND NEIGHBORHOOD INVESTMENT
COMMITTEES' REPORTS relative to the City's eviction moratorium during the
COVID-19 pandemic, Emergency Rental Assistance Program, tenant protections, and
related matters BE AMENDED as follows:

 I. REQUEST the City Attorney, with the assistance of LAHD, to draft an ordinance
 to amend Section 49.99, et seq. of the LAMC to:

 b. Sunset Sections 49.99.2.B (no-fault evictions), 49.99.2.C (unauthorized pets
 and additional tenants), and 49.99.4 (demolition, permanent removal - Ellis)
 of the LAMC effective January 31, 2023, except that:

 1. Evictions undertaken in order to comply with a Government Agency
 Order or right that requires or allows the rental unit to be vacated, shall
 be allowed immediately upon the effective date of the ordinance
 amendment, in accordance with the procedures in LAMC Section
 151.09. *Amended pursuant to Motion (Cedillo - Buscaino)

 11. Evictions in order to install a resident manager shall be allowed only
 when an on-site manager is required by law or in order to comply with
 the terms of an affordable housing covenant agreement unless a
 Notice of Intent to Withdraw Units from Rental Housing Use was




 w\
 submitted to the Los Angeles Housing Department prior to the
 commencement of the local emergency period.



 PRESENTED BY: 6l
 Gi e A. Cedillo
 �CT'
 Councilmember, First District




 OCT O 4 2022
 TO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMENT ON NEXT #51
 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTED




 MOTION

 I MOVE that $10,765 in the Council District 4 portion of the Street Furniture
Revenue Fund No. 43D, Dept. 50 be transferred I appropriated to the Public Works Trust
Fund No. 834-50, Revenue Source Code 574203 (B-Permit Deposits, Work Order No.
BR003481), to cover the balance of the costs associated with a traffic circle improvement
at the intersection of Bronson Avenue and Canyon Drive in Council District 4.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Department of Public Works (Office of Accounting)
be authorized to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above
fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.




 PRESENTED BY:
 ~~
 Councilwoman, 4th District


 SECONDED BY :
 /
 VA.~ &·

 .:.:.
ak




OCT () 4 2022
 - -·-·· .. .. ----·-~·-
 - ...
 ~
 ·\
 1) CITY CLERK t-OR PLACEMENT ON rIDT #52 /
 REGUlAR COUtietl AGENDA TO BE POSTED ,
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~--__,_..-..~-

 MOTION
 /
I MOVE that, subject to the approval of the Mayor, $400 be transferred I appropriated
from the General City Purposes Fund No.100-56, Account No. 0714 (CD-14 Community
Services) to the General Services Fund No. 100-40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As
Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 14 special observance of
the Ambassador of Ethiopia at City Hall on October 5th 2022, including the illumination
of City Hall.

PRESENTED BY: SECONDED BY:
 0

Councilmember, 14th District
 · - -- - - - -· - -..............- - - - · · -w• -•• · · - - - - ·


 TO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMEN·r ON NEXT
 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTED #53
 M 0 T 1"'1:1~----------__J:.___ _1

 On August 2, 2022, 81-year-old Ok Ja Kim, a loving mother to two grown daughters and a doting grandmother dedicated
to her loved ones, did not arrive to pick up her grandson for basketball practice. When family members could not reach her,
they went to her residence in Woodland Hills, where she lived alone, and discovered that she had been brutally murdered in a
home invasion robbery. She suffered numerous horrific injuries and was declared dead at the scene.

 The person or persons responsible for this crime represent an ongoing threat to the safety of the people of Los Angeles;
therefore, it is appropriate for the City of Los Angeles to offer a reward for information leading to the identification,
apprehension and conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of Ok Ja Kim.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that by adoption of this Motion, the City Council provide an offer of reward for information
leading to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of Ok Ja Kim on
August 2, 2022, and in support thereof, make the following findings pursuant to Division 19, Chapter 12, Article I of the Los
Angeles Administrative Code:

1. That the death of Mrs. Kim was caused by the willful misconduct of one or more persons.

2. That this offer of reward is consistent with and taken for the immediate protection of the public peace, health and safety
 of local residents, as well as visitors to the City, and is consistent with the need to arrest and convict the person who,
 because of not being apprehended, could by their actions further terrorize and present a continuing and immediate menace
 to the rights of persons in the City.

3. That what happened to the victim is an especially disturbing crime and therefore, as a matter of public policy, the City
 hereby offers a reward as an added inducement for persons to come forward with information leading to the identification,
 apprehension and conviction of the person or persons responsible for the death of Ok Ja Kim.

4. That the sum of $50,000 shall be the aggregate maximum sum of any payment or payments of a City reward in this
 instance.

5. That the offer of reward shall be in effect for six months from the date of the advertisement of the reward by the City
 Clerk.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Clerk be directed to cause notices and/or advertisements to be duly published according
to the requirements of Division 19, Chapter 12, Article 1 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code, and to thereby cause the
offer of reward to become effective.




 SECONDEDBY: ~
 abg
 rTO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMEN! ON NEXr #54 1
 ,
 I' -=---
 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTFD ,- . J
 -- - - - - - -·--_..--.:'£"-....__ ...;er:>.




 Motion

The Destination Crenshaw construction team will be hosting a construction site tour and a
progress briefing for City departments and interested parties on October 5, 2022. The city has
received a request to waive fees to assist in the costs for this event in relation to parking
reservations.

I THEREFORE, MOVE, that $375 be transferred I appropriated from the Council District 10
portion of the Special Events Fee subsidy line item in the General City Purposes Fund No.
100-56 to Fund 363, department revenue 49340T ; and that the Department of Transportation
be directed to close City parking lot no. 625 on October 5th 2022 during the hours of 7:00 a.m.
to 1:00 p.m. (or on any other date and time to which this activity may need to be rescheduled)




 PRESENTED BY~ <:(
 HEATHER HUTT
 Councilwoman, 10th District


 SECONDEDB~




 GCI o 4 2022·
 tNt"\:JY, WMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE &Kt vc.r'

 MOTION
 The Department of Water and Power (DWP) recently launched one of the most progressive
programs to promote climate change and environmental equity by a major city. Through its
Comprehensive Affordable Multifamily Retrofits (CAMR) Program, launched in May 2022, the
City's low-income tenants and multifamily property owners can receive assistance to reduce their
energy consumption at reduced costs. According to DWP research, the potential target service
population includes 230,960 customers on low income or lifeline discount rates, and
approximately 409,298 affordable housing units within the City. The program requires participating
owners to:
 • Have five or more units;
 • Meet the affordability requirement of at least 66% of households at or below 80% of Area
 Median Income (AMI);
 • Have property located in a Disadvantaged Community (DAC); and,
 • Install energy improvements that equate to at least 10% in energy savings.

 The CAMR Program provides robust incentives and certified technical support for owners
and tenants to reduce energy consumption. The Program also provides owners with a complete
building assessment and helps to identify certified contractors working at prevailing wage to install
the agreed upon scope of work. Not only is the program on path to make significant contributions
towards cutting our regions greenhouse gas emissions, but the information collected can provide
keen insights into the policy decisions that are needed for the future.

 The data collected from the Program needs to be analyzed to identify where future City
investments in technology, education, and infrastructure are to be made to continue our reduction
of greenhouse gas pollution. The DWP is already collecting metrics on the Program's
implementation, as well as its utilization and lessons learned. Sharing this important data from the
CAMR Program with the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) and our other climate
and sustainability departments would assist the City in policy decisions that seek to reduce our
greenhouse gas emissions in the most equitable way possible. The collaborative efforts of the
DWP and CEMO and others is crucial to developing a decarbonization effort that works for all.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council request the Department of Water and Power
(DWP) to report on its Comprehensive Affordable Multifamily Retrofits (CAMR) Program
implementation and the metrics it is utilizing to measure progress towards achieving Program
goals.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the DWP be requested to share information and data associated
with the CAMR Program with the Climate Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) in order to assist
CEMO in providing the City Council with recommendations on improving citywide _ _
decarbonizations efforts.


 PRESENTED BY: -~~
 MITCH O'FARRELL
 c~·lmem~
 ber, 13
 1




OCT 0 SECONDED BY: TUt-t{
 ~~~~----~~----'-~~~
 ~I




bsw
 HOMELESSNESS ANO POVERT'·
 MOTION
There is a homelessness crisis in the state of California and in the City of Los Angeles. To
address this need, the State Budget for fiscal year 2022-23 allocated $336 million for
homelessness programs to the largest 13 cities, proportional to their Point-In-Time (PIT) Count
results, through its Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention (HHAP) grant program. In
2021, the State made available $1 billion in HHAP-2 funding, of which the City received around
$55 million, and in 2022, the State made available $1 billion in HHAP-3 funding, of which the
City expects to receive a total allocation of $143,640,000. The State is again making available
$1 billion for HHAP Round 4; the application for which is now open. The City has not yet
received an estimate of the HHAP-4 funding that may be allocated to the City.

HHAP was established by the State to provide jurisdictions with one-time grant funds to
support regional coordination and expand or develop local capacity to address their immediate
homelessness challenges with a focus on moving homeless individuals and families into
permanent housing and supporting the efforts of those individuals and families to maintain their
permanent housing. HHAP Round 4 funding follows the same guidelines for spending as the
second and third rounds. HHAP funding is eligible to be used for evidence-based solutions that
address and prevent homelessness which includes: rental assistance and rapid rehousing,
operating subsidies for supportive housing and shelters, landlord incentives, outreach and
coordination, permanent and inn_ovative housing solutions, prevention, and capital for navigation
centers and emergency shelters.

The application for HHAP Round 4 is due by November 29, 2022. In order to be ready for the
receipt of the grant, the City should begin to produce a plan to spend the HHAP grant and
establish priority categories in order to apply for the grant. The City should work in coordination
with its City departments, the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, and community
partners, in order to prioritize its needs for the expenditure categories.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the City Administrative Officer (CAO) to
apply for the Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention Round 4 before the deadline of
November29,2022;and

I FURTHER MOVE that the City Council instruct the CAO and the Chief Legislative
Analyst to take into consideration input from Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, City
departments, and priorities from the Council and Mayor and report to Council with
recommendations on the HHAP Round 4 funding categories to be submitted to the State as part
of the application.

 SECONDED BY:




 OCT 0 ·4 2022
 MOTION HOUSING

 On February 4, 2020, the City Council approved the acceptance of $500,000 from CP V 520 Mateo,
LLC, the developer of a project located at 520, 524, 528, 532 Mateo Street and 1310 East 4t1i Place in
Council District 14 and pursuant to the conditions of Planning Case No. CPC-2016-3853-GPA-VZC-IID-
ZAD-SPR and Ordinance No. 185827 (C.F. I8-0716-S2). The condition found within the the [Q]
Conditions of Approval is reproduced in its entirety below:

 13. The Applicant shall provide 2.25 million dollars to the Council District 14 Public Benefit Trust
 Fund Affordable Housing Subaccount for fature affordable housing within Council District 14, a
 minimum of 500 thousand dollars ofwhich shall be paid within sixty (60) days ofthe later of (i) the
 expiration of the applicable statute of limitations to challenge the project, including the
 entitlements and the project EIR or (ii) ifa judicial challenge has been filed, such judicial challenge
 has been finally resolved in a manner acceptable to both City and developer in their reasonable
 discretion. The remaining one-million seven hundredfifty thousand dollars ($1,750,000) shall be
 paid prior to the issuance ofa building permit.

 Subsequent to the Council's action, the initial payment was never actualized, the check was never
cashed, and the check is no longer valid. Therefore, the developer has provided a replacement check in the
amount of $500,000. In addition, the developer has also provided a second check in the amount of
$1,750,000 which represents the balance of the public benefit payment referenced above. In accordance
with Chapter 150, Section 5.550 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, Council will need to amend its
previous action by authorizing the acceptance of a new payment in the amount of $500,000, authorize the
acceptance of a second payment in the amount of$1,750,000, and cause them both to be deposited into the
Council District 14 Public Benefits Trust Fund Affordable Housing Subaccount.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council action of February 4, 2020 relative to accepting the amount
of $500,000 from CP V 520 Mateo, LLC, the developer of a project located at 520, 524, 528, 532 Mateo
Street and 1310 East 4th Place, Planning Case No. CPC-2016-3 853-GPA-VZC-HD-ZAD-SPR and
Ordinance No. 185827 (Project; C.F. 18-0716-S2), for the purpose of future affordable housing within
Council District 14 BE AMENDED to ACCEPT a new payment in the sum of $500,000 for the above
purposes and to reaffirm the instructions of the prior Council action, inasmuch as the initial payment issued
was never actualized, the check was never cashed, and a new action is now needed.

 I FURTHER MOVE that Council ACCEPT an additional payment from CP V 520 Mateo, LLC, in
the sum of $1,750,000 and cause this sum to be deposited into the Council District 14 Public Benefits Trust
Fund No. 57L, for the purpose of future affordable housing within Council District 14; and

 . I FURTHER MOVE that the City Clerk be authorized to make any corrections, clarifications or "··
revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including any new instructions, in order to effectuat the
intent of this Motion.




T 0 4 2022

oi



 OCT 0 4 20tt
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GENERAL SERVICE
 1


 MOTION
 Recently, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced a first-of-its-kind
 cybersecurity grant program specifically for state, local, and territorial (SLT) governments across
 the country. This State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, made possible by President
 Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, provides $1 billion in funding to SLT partners over four
 years, with $185 million available for FY22.
 In light of the recent ransomware attack on LAUSD, the second largest school district in the
 nation, the City must be certain that its legacy cybersecurity platforms are securing its 40,000
 employees and four million residents from cyber-attacks. The City should seek out the most
 advanced technology in cybersecurity, including the Artificial Intelligence (AI) standards set by
 the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the guidance from the National
 Security Commission on AI (NSCAI).

 As the nation's second largest city, Los Angeles must lead on expertly addressing unique
 cybersecurity risks, strengthen the cybersecurity of our critical infrastructure, and ensure
 resilience against persistent cyber threats to our communities. The State and Local Cybersecurity
 Grant Program will play a critical role in helping the City build our capability and capacity to
 predict and protect our critical infrastructure and communities from malicious cyber activity.
 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council direct the City's Administrative Officer (CAO), the
 Chief Legislative Analyst's Office (CLA), the Information Technology Agency (ITA) and any
 other relevant department to report back on the Department of Homeland Security's State and
 Local Cybersecurity Grant Program, specifically what the grant can be used for and the
 application process and timing.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the aforementioned departments be directed to take into consideration
 Council File 22-0779 that directs the appropriate departments to report back on security
 measures and protocols in place to detect "novel attacks" in real-time, and any other form of
 advanced cyber-attack that could place critical infrastructure in jeopardy, including information
 on the current and future deployment of AI within the Department's cybersecurity program and
 whether they classify as possessing "Third Wave AI" under DARPA's definition and NSCAl's
 guidance, and a comprehensive review of the City's current IT asset management capabilities, as



 Wft7
 well as potential recommendations to improve or develop the City's IT asset management
 systems in order to effectively identify security coverage gaps, as well as effectively managing
 all the City's IT assets. ~ C>
 PRESENTED BY .L
 ~~----~~--~~~~~~~~~~


 JO S.LE
 Councilmember, 12th District

ocr o 4
 SECONDED BY
 MOTION
 TRADE, TRAVELANDTOURISM

The City of Los Angeles must implement creative and innovative solutions to issues related to wayfinding, promoting
small businesses, highlighting community organizations, providing wifi access on public rights of way and other
quality of life issues. Tourists and pedestrians in Los Angeles need improved mechanisms to receive information on
where to go, what to do and to have reliable access to information that will guide them to local businesses that are in
desperate need of assistance coming out of the pandemic.

The City of Los Angeles has contracted with the Los Angeles Tourism and Convention Board (LATCB) to promote
and sell Los Angeles as a destination for conventions, meetings and leisure travel since 1976. The City Council gave
LATCB direction to enhance the visitor experience through an integrated network of visitor centers, digital channels,
interactive digital wayfinding and visitor service kiosks, visitor information publications (digital or print) and in-market
servicing of group clients providing convenient and relevant destination information and resources.

In November 2019, City Council instructed CTD to work with the Bureau of Street Services on expanding public
information associated with conventions and tourism (CF 00-1073-S1). CTD and LATCB have been working on
identifying opportunities that can fulfill these recommendations and bring an innovative program for approval.

In 2020, the City of Los Angeles adopted the Tourism Master Plan, which is a destination management plan that
analyzes our city's tourism assets and looks at what infrastructure is required in order to handle the large increase in
visitation expected in the upcoming years. As one of the fastest growing industries, tourism has been a stabilizing
force for the City's economy and is an integral part of the foundation of our City. Section 6.3 of the Tourism Master
Plan specifically calls for "a universal, integrated, real-time, digital system of wayfinding to be implemented
throughout the Greater Los Angeles metro area."

On March 91h, 2022, the Mayor 2020, the mayor issued Executive Directive #33, creating the City of Los Angeles
Tourism Cabinet, with the aim of supporting the Tourism Master Plan.

The Board of City Tourism Department Commissioners, at their September 2P' meeting, unanimously approved and
recommended to the City Tourism Department Executive Director that CTD staff proceed with exploring the proposed
piggyback agreement with IKE Smart City, LLC and the City of Houston, Texas for the installation and maintenance
of interactive kiosks in the City of Los Angeles.

Section 371 (e) (8) of the City Charter and 10.15 (a) (8) of the Los Angeles Administrative Code allows Los Angeles
City Departments to "piggyback" on agreements or contracts established by other government entities or cooperative
purchasing agencies. The piggybacking process is well-established government contracting tool and has been used
by the City in the past. The City of Houston underwent a thorough and competitive RFP process and chose IKE
Smart City as their winning BID. The City of Houston is a comparable government entity to the City of Los Angeles.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Attorney, with the assistance of the City Tourism Department, Bureau of Street
Services and all other relevant departments, prepare and present an agreement within 30 days with IKE Smart City,
LLC, utilizing the competitive RFP process conducted by the City of Houston, Texas, for the installation and
maintenance of interactive kiosks in the City of Los Angeles.



 ENTED BY~~c,._.
 JOE BUSCAINO
 "'

 cilmember, 15th District



SECONDED BY~~~
OCT O 4 'ntt
 MOTION

 The City of Los Angeles is committed to serving the City's youth by creating systems, programs, and
 spaces that connect our youth to educational and employment services and opportunities. The City's
 YouthSource Center (YSC) system, operated by the Economic and Workforce Development Department
 (EWDD), is an innovative workforce development system that inherently narrows the equity gap for our
 most disadvantaged and vulnerable youth, including young women, transgender youth, LGBTQ+ youth,
 and youth of color. Since inception, YSC has helped thousands of individuals attain valuable skills which
 have in tum helped stabilize their economic conditions and fortify their financial futures.

 In recent years, the City Council has taken numerous priority actions that aim to strategically address the
 challenges and barriers that systematically prevent the progress of our youth. For example, the City
 Council established the Youth Development Department and the Angeleno Corps program to, along with
 EWDD, lead the City in its strategy to strengthen the lives of the City's youth through equitable
 opportunity and solution-based outcomes. Additionally, due to its diligence and trajectory of strategic
 planning, the EWDD received a $50 million grant from the State of California - CA for All - to invest in
 our City's youth.

 However, while the City has prioritized connecting our youth to educational programs, job skills training,
 and employment opportunities, the City has not created effective pathways that lead our young Angelenos
 and recent college graduates to City employment.

 The City is currently recruiting for numerous vacant positions. However, there are multiple systemic
 barriers ranging from ineffective recruitment strategies to inequities in the hiring process that have made
 it a challenge to recruit candidates and retain them as permanent employees. Having a high vacancy rate
 is detrimental to the City's ability to function and provide timely response to some of the critical issues
 the City currently faces such as affordable housing, homelessness, economic development and job
 creation, and management of infrastructure projects.

 Given the City's commitment to advancing the economic needs of our youth and recent college graduates,
 and the City's need to fill positions throughout our City departments, it is imperative that the City explore
 the creation of a City of Los Angeles Career Pathways Fellowship Program (Career Pathways/LA).
 Through Career Pathways/LA, the City would seek to recruit, educate, train, and place young Angelenos
 and recent college graduates, including young women, transgender youth, LGBTQ+ youth, and youth of
 color, into City positions with the goal of promoting and retaining these fellows for long-term City
 employment.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the Economic and Workforce Development
 Department, with the assistance of the Youth Development Department, the Personnel Department, the
 Chief Administrative Officer, and any other necessary department, to report to the Economic
 Development and Jobs Committee on: 1) A framework and strategic plan to create and implement the
 City of Los Angeles Career Pathways Fellowship Program (Career Pathways/LA) with the purpose of
 bridging City youth and recent college graduates to City employment; 2) A proposed curriculum and
 program eligibility requirements; 3) An outreach and recruitment strategy; 4) Benefits and resources for
 program participants, 5) Staffing and budgetary needs; and, 6) An analysis of best practices.


ui.;1 o 4 2022
 TEDBY ~
 c