Appearance Commission — Skokie, IL
Date: 2026-02-11

Agenda for
 APPEARANCE COMMISSION
 February 11, 2026 7:30 PM
 Skokie Village Hall, 5127 Oakton Street - Council Chambers
 1) Call to Order/Declaration of Quorum

 2) Roll Call

 3) Approval of Meeting Minutes January 14, 2026 Go To
 4) Old Business

 5) New Business

 a. 2026-003A – 9617 Kildare Ave (Residential)
 Applicant: Ramon Contreras Go To
 Owner: Saugat Paudel
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition

 b. 2026-004A – 10014 Lamon Ave (Residential)
 Applicant & Owner: Abdul and Shamim Samjoo
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition
 Go To
 c. 2026-005A – 8041 Tripp Ave (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Owner: Kevin and Natalia Frampton
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition
 Go To

Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may contact Brian Augustine with the
Community Development Department by calling 847-933-8223 or by emailing
publiccomments@skokie.org. All emails and comments submitted will be made public and shared with this
body.

The Village, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities
who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the Village’s ADA coordinator Angel
Schnur at angel.schnur@skokie.org or 847.933.8400.
 d. 2026-006A – 9537 Keeler Ave (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Go To
 Owner: Menachem and Feige Slavaticki
 Request: 1st and 2nd Floor Addition

 e. 2026-007A – 5013 Oakton St (Non-Residential)
 Applicant: Anthony Rowe and Kevin Smith Go To
 Owner: Robert Fitzpatrick
 Request: Façade

 6) Public Comment

 7) Communications from Staff

 8) Adjournment


 Next Meeting of the Appearance Commission is on March 11, 2026 .




Individuals with questions or feedback about an agenda item may contact Brian Augustine with the
Community Development Department by calling 847-933-8223 or by emailing
publiccomments@skokie.org. All emails and comments submitted will be made public and shared with this
body.

The Village, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, requests that persons with disabilities
who require certain accommodations to allow them to observe or participate in this hearing, or who have
questions about the accessibility of the meeting facilities, contact the Village’s ADA coordinator Angel
Schnur at angel.schnur@skokie.org or 847.933.8400.
 Back to Agenda




 Meeting Minutes for
 Appearance Commission
 January 14, 2026 | 7:30 PM
Skokie Village Hall | 5127 Oakton Street, Skokie IL 60077 | Council Chambers
 Members Present: Mark Penning, Chair
 Thomas DaMario, Vice Chair
 Julie Naumiak
 Joe Maschek
 Charles Isho
 Carlos Ruiz
 Jacob Shapiro
 Jay Pathak
 Members Absent:
 Presiding Officer: Angel Schnur, Building & Inspection Services
 Manager
 Staff Present: Jose Acosta, Planning Coordinator
 Others Present:


 1) Time Meeting was Called to Order/Declaration of Quorum

 A quorum being present, Chairman Penning called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM.

 2) Approval of Meeting Minutes

 Commissioner DaMario noted a discrepancy in the December 10, 2025 minutes. He
 explained that the minutes stated there was one absence for each case, but the tabulation
 showed zero absences. Mr. DaMario indicated that according to his notes, no one was
 absent at the last meeting, with all seven members present and voting. He suggested the
 tabulation was accurate, and the other notation was incorrect.

 A motion to approve the minutes of the December 10, 2025 meeting with the noted
 qualification was made by Commissioner DaMario and seconded by Commissioner
 Naumiak. The motion passed unanimously with all members voting in favor.


 3) New Business

 2026-001A – 8109 Laramie Ave. (Residential)
 Applicant: Christopher J. Bremer
 Owner: Mike and Carly Long
 Request: 2nd floor addition



637679 – Appearance Commission Minutes – January 14, 2026
 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.

 Tracy Brewer from Compass Architecture, representing homeowners Mike and Carly
 Long, presented plans for a 450 square foot second floor addition located over the north
 portion of the first floor. The addition would use matching brick, windows, and asphalt
 shingles to make it appear as part of the original construction.

 The homeowners explained that they wanted to maintain the existing look of the house
 while expanding for additional space, as they both work from home. They noted that
 while exact matching brick would be difficult to find, they planned to use reclaimed
 Chicago common brick similar to what they had used for a chimney rebuild about five
 years ago.

 Commissioner DaMario expressed concern about the asymmetry of the existing roof
 above the entry, wondering if it could be made more symmetrical. The architect
 explained that the load-bearing brick wall of the house dictated the positioning.
 Some commissioners suggested adding a pergola, canopy, or soldier course above the
 garage door to break up the large expanse of brick between the garage door and the new
 second-floor windows. After discussion, while some commissioners preferred additions
 to break up the space, others felt the simple design was appropriate for the modest one-
 car garage and the overall style of the home.

 Recommendation & Voting
 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented, with the
 suggestion to add some corbelling or a brick soldier course along the eave line following
 the porch or adding some type of additional flourish at the upper window to break up the
 mass. The vote was unanimous.

 Motion: Joe Maschek Second: Thomas DaMario
 Ayes: 8
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 0




 2026-002A – 8049 Kilbourn Ave (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Owner: Tamara Andrade and Charles Huth
 Request: 1st Floor Façade Alteration

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.

 Nathan Kriska, the architect, presented plans to convert an attached garage facing
 Kilbourn Avenue to a habitable room and construct a detached garage in the rear yard.


637679 – Appearance Commission Minutes – January 14, 2026
 The proposal included removing the garage door and replacing it with brick and windows
 to match the existing structure.

 Mr. Kriska explained that after searching multiple suppliers, he could not find matching
 brick. Instead, he proposed using stone that would match the existing stonework at the
 front door for the area beneath the window where the garage door had been. He also
 requested a change from the original proposal, eliminating a window on the south
 elevation to accommodate the placement of a bed in what would become a bedroom.

 The Commission discussed details including the width of the window, the addition of a
 stone sill to match existing windows, and plans for landscaping the area where the
 driveway would be removed. The homeowner confirmed they would be adding native
 landscaping to the space.

 Recommendation & Voting
 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness with the addition of stone to
 be placed under the front windows and removing the window that was planned for the
 south elevation. The vote was unanimous.

 Motion: Julie Naumiak Second: Thomas DaMario
 Ayes: 8
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 0




 4) Old Business

 2025-025A – 7656 Crawford Ave. (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Owner: Maria & Daniel Toma
 Request: 2nd Floor (Revision)

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.
 Nathan Kriska returned to present revised plans for a second-floor addition that had
 previously been approved by the Commission in July 2025. The original approval
 included staining or painting the existing first-floor brick and adding hardy panel siding
 to the second floor.

 The revised proposal showed thin brick veneer on the north and east elevations of the
 first floor adhered to the existing brick, with matching thin brick veneer on the north and
 west elevations of the second floor over a framed wall. The south and west first-floor
 walls would remain stained or painted brick, while the south and west second-floor walls
 would remain hardy panel siding as originally approved.


637679 – Appearance Commission Minutes – January 14, 2026
 Staff expressed concerns about the revised proposal, noting that thin brick does not count
 toward the 51% minimum masonry requirement in the building code, and that the new
 elevations appeared incoherent with different exterior materials on each floor.

 Mr. Kriska explained that the homeowner wanted a more cohesive look on the street-
 facing elevations, and the thin brick would provide a uniform appearance. He also noted
 that some windows had been enlarged, which would require infill that wouldn't match the
 existing brick texture.

 The Commission discussed several aspects of the proposal:
 ● The need to wrap the thin brick around corners for a cohesive appearance,
 particularly on the south elevation which is highly visible when approaching from
 Howard Street
 ● The durability and installation method of thin brick veneer
 ● The front door design and the possibility of centering it with two sidelights
 ● The redesigned entrance stoop and stone treatment
 ● Using narrower profile hardy board siding on the rear elevations to better
 complement the brick scale

 After extensive discussion, the Commission reached a consensus on several
 modifications to the proposal.

 Recommendation & Voting
 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented with the thin
 brick as proposed on the north and east elevation and on the second floor of the south
 elevation, with Hardy allowed on the west elevation with a thinner profile more in
 keeping with the brick size. The motion included requirements for a larger stoop
 matching the stone elevation, a brick between the veneer brick and the existing brick on
 the south elevation, and a door more in keeping with the style of the house. The vote was
 unanimous with one absence.

 Motion: Joe Maschek Second: Charles Isho
 Ayes: 8
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 0


 5) Communication from Staff


 6) Public Comment

 David Dalka of 9003 Laurel Avenue spoke, requesting that the Commission's scope be
 expanded to include property standards issues. He expressed concerns about poorly
 maintained buildings in the village and specific issues with neighboring properties. He
 presented photos of properties he considered problematic and suggested that the


637679 – Appearance Commission Minutes – January 14, 2026
 Commission had the expertise to address these matters if given the authority by village
 leadership.

 The Chairman advised that Mr. Dalka would be contacted by the appropriate Village staff
 members.


 7) Adjourn

 Motion to Adjourn was made by Commissioner Naumiak and seconded by
 Commissioner Shapiro. The motion passed unanimously.

 Meeting adjourned at 8:35 PM


Respectfully Submitted

Jose Acosta,
Planning Coordinator




637679 – Appearance Commission Minutes – January 14, 2026
MEMORANDUM
Community Development Department

To: Mark Penning, Appearance Commission Chair
 Appearance Commission Members

From: Angel Schnur, Building & Inspection Services Manager
 Jose Acosta, Planning Coordinator

Date: February 11, 2026

SUBJECT: APPEARANCE COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Staff offers the following comments on the cases scheduled for the February 11th, 2026, Appearance
Commission meeting:

NEW BUSINESS:

2026-003A 9617 Kildare Ave (Residential) - The applicant is proposing the construction of a
 585-square-foot second-floor addition located above the western portion of the
 existing first floor. The addition is designed to match the scale and appearance of the
 existing structure and remain consistent with the overall character of the residence.

 Staff has reviewed the proposed elevations and has no objections. The exterior
 materials and finishes will complement the existing structure, using similar colors and
 design elements. The addition is designed to blend in with the original building and
 will not look out of place.

2026-004A 10014 Lamon Ave (Residential) – The applicant is proposing to construct a second-
 floor addition that will cover the existing first-floor footprint, totaling approximately
 1,305 square feet.

 The addition will be finished with new vinyl siding, which will contrast with the
 existing brick on the first floor. Staff has no objections to the proposed elevations.
 The overall design remains compliant with the 51% masonry requirement.


2026-005A 8041 Tripp Ave (Residential) - The applicant is proposing a second-floor dormer
 addition totaling approximately 189.5 square feet, increasing the existing second-
 floor area from 260 square feet to 449.5 square feet. The dormer is located within the
 existing building footprint and does not expand the first-floor footprint.

 Staff notes that the dormer is offset on the east and west elevations, which makes the
 addition appear somewhat disconnected from the existing structure. Otherwise, staff
 has no objections to the proposed elevations. The siding and windows on the addition
 will match the existing materials, and the 51% masonry requirement is met.



Doc 637933 – February 11, 2026 Appearance Staff Report
 1
2026-006A 9537 Keeler Ave (Residential) – The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,491-
 square-foot second-floor addition that will fully cover the remaining first-floor
 footprint. The addition will be finished entirely in vinyl siding. Staff has concerns
 about whether the 51% masonry requirement is met, as the second-floor addition
 appears slightly taller than the existing first floor, which may require additional
 masonry to maintain compliance.

 Staff notes that the addition creates a more cohesive appearance and makes the
 building read as a fuller structure. Staff recommends incorporating additional brick on
 the proposed west elevation to better tie the addition to the existing building. Overall,
 staff is supportive of the proposed elevations.

2026-007A 5013 Oakton St (Non-Residential) - The applicant is proposing modifications to the
 north elevation of 5013–5019 Oakton Street, including new storefront windows and
 doors, a metal awning, and updated exterior finishes. The elevation incorporates a
 mix of brick tones, smooth-face architectural block, and modern metal siding to
 create a refreshed façade.

 Staff has no objections to the proposed elevations, but notes that signage is not part of
 this proposal. Any future signage for businesses along this improved façade must
 comply with the Village sign code, or additional review by the Appearance
 Commission will be required.




Doc 637933 – February 11, 2026 Appearance Staff Report
 2
Back to Agenda
9621 Kildare
9617 N Kildare




 West Elevation North Elevation




 East Elevation south Elevation
9617 Kildare Materials




 BARKWOOD SHINGLE AUTUMN TAN SIDING
 Back to Agenda

 Village of Skokie
 APPEARANCE COMMISSION APPLICATION
 Community Development Department - Building & Inspection Services Division
 5127 Oakton St. Skokie, IL 60077
 Phone 847/933-8223
 The Appearance Commission meets the 2nd Wednesday* of each month at 7:30 p.m.
 *Unless otherwise noted
 Applications will only be accepted in a PDF format.


APPLICATION DATE: 01/22/2026
 _____________________________________

APPLICATION TYPE (Please check all that apply):
 New Construction 1st Floor Addition 2nd Floor Addition Façade Signage Other

LAND USE:
 Single Family Residential Multifamily Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Other

 10014 Lamon Ave. Skokie IL. 60077
SUBJECT ADDRESS: ___________________________________________________________________________

OWNER INFORMATION: Please print legibly.
NAME(S): Abdul Samjoo / Shamim Samjoo
ADDRESS: 10014 Lamon Ave. CITY, STATE ZIP: Skokie, IL. 60077
PHONE#: EMAIL:

AGENT/PETITIONER INFORMATION (if other than owner):
NAME(S):
remov
ADDRESS: CITY, STATE ZIP: ______________________________
PHONE #: ______________________________________ EMAIL: _______________________________________
Please submit the following PDFs to appearance@skokie.org to complete your digital-only application:
 1. Elevations, floor plans, and site plans. Scale ¼” = 1’-0” is preferred, but not required. If the file size is greater
 than 5MB, multiple emails are allowed. Ensure “Appearance Commission PDF” and the project’s property
 address are in the subject line of the email. Color elevations or one color rendering is required.
 2. Completed Zoning Information Worksheet (residential projects only)
 3. Photographs (all sides of the subject building and the fronts of neighboring buildings)
 4. Excerpts of brochures and/or cut sheets of new materials and colors proposed for the project. Matching
 existing materials and colors can be confirmed with the submitted photographs.
 5. Plat of Survey
Does your project include a green roof? Yes No
* If your project includes a green roof you will placed at or near the top of the agenda.


 Fee Schedule
 Residential Site (new) … $100 plus $50.00 per unit
 Non-Residential Site* (new) … $100 plus $50.00 per 1,000 square feet (based on square footage of building)
 * Any non-residentially zoned site (Business, Industrial, Mixed-Use districts)
 Any Other Appearance Review (Additions, Façade, Sign Package, etc.) … $50.00
 If you have already paid for a preliminary plan review there is no charge.
 For Office Use Only:
 Case Number ____________________________ Meeting Date ________________________________________________
 Acct # NR Amt $ _________________________ Cash / Credit Card/ Check # ____________________________________


VOSDOCS-#149808-v18-Appearance_Commission_Application_form Revised 12/12/25
Nort
 h Elevat
 ion WestElevat
 ion




Sout
 h Elevat
 ion EastElevat
 ion
 1
 0014 Lamon Avenue
 Skoki
 e-Illinoi
 s
Back to Agenda
 FIRE RESTORATION
 AND REMODELING
 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
 8041 TRIPP AVE
 SKOKIE IL

 6415 N. Caldwell Ave.
 Chicago, Il.  60646
 Plat of Survey by
 Legal Description
 Central Survey PLLC
 Phone
 Fax
 (773) 631-5285
 (773) 775-2071
 www.Centralsurvey.com
 NK ARCHITECT
 Lot 60 in Ackva & Chanock's Oakton Street and Keeler Avenue "L" Subdivision of the South ½ of the East ½ of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 22, Township 41
 North, Range 13 East of the Third Principal Meridian, also of the North ½ of the East ½ of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ½ of Section 22, aforesaid, in Cook County, Illinois NATHAN KRISKA
 3322 DEMPSTER STREET
 Commonly Known as: 8041 N. Tripp Ave., Skokie, Illinois SKOKIE, IL 60076
 Area of Land Described: 4,061 Sq. Ft. TEL. 847-983-8383


 South Line of Keeney Street
 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS




 Rec = 163.85'
 WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
 AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
 BELIEF, THEY COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 NE. Face Wood Fence Post 0.40' S. & 1.47' W. THE BUILDING CODE OF THE SKOKIE IL
 AND THE LAWS OF THE ILLINOIS .

 N. Face Wood Fence Post On Line




 Concrete Curb
 11/18/2025

 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF RECORD DATE

 Walk
 Alley
 Rec & Meas = 123.09' NSED ARCHIT
 LIC T
 EC
 6.36'




 N. Tripp Ave.
 E
 5.68'
 91°18'30" NATHAN KRISKA
 Pavers 001-013484
 0.69 Red Stone 1.80
 0.68 EXP.
 17.57'
 22.01 0.81 15.11 11.30.2026 IS


 33.0'
 6.18
 1.0
 1.03. ST  AT O
 13.59' 1.0 80 Existing One E O F ILLI N


 33.0' (Gravel)
 Story Brick 7.38




 Concrete Apron
 11.02
 Residence Lot 60 Existing


 Rec & Meas =
 Pavers
 18.51 Frame
 20.19
 PROJECT CONSULTANTS




 Rec & Meas =
 Garage
 Enclosed
 1.0
 13.93' 3.
 1.0 75 Frame Porch
 0.34 3.94
 1.0
 0.67 31.58'
 5.0 0.65
 22.21
 0.15 7.30
 3.16' 3.08'
 1.90'
 0.34 36.0


 16 Ft.
 18.0' 1.93'
 123.09'
 Rec & Meas =



 Concrete
 Legend
 N. = North
 S. = South
 E. = East S. Face Wood Fence Post 0.16' S.
 W. = West
 (TYP) = Typical SE. Face Wood Fence Post 0.08' S. & 1.34' W.
 Rec = Record
 Meas = Measure NE. Face Plastic Fence Post On Line & 0.35' W.
 St. = Street
 Ave. = Avenue M. Henri
 Decimal/Inch Conversions 2668 en
 0.01' = 1/8" n
 Joh ks
 0.02' = 1/4" 0.08' = 1" 0.58' = 7"
 0.03' = 3/8" 0.17' = 2" 0.67' = 8" Professional
 0.04' = 1/2" 0.25' = 3" 0.75' = 9" Land
 0.05' = 5/8" 0.33' = 4" 0.83' = 10" Surveyor
 Ch State of
 0.06' = 3/4" 0.42' = 5" 0.92' = 11"
 0.07' = 7/8" 0.50' = 6" 1.00' = 12" State of Illinois ) ica Illinoisoi  s
 ) S.S. g o, in
 NOTES: *Property corners were NOT staked per customer.*Building County of Cook ) IlI
 lines and easements, if any, shown hereon are building lines and
 easements as shown on the recorded Subdivision plat.*Consult Central Survey PLLC does hereby certify that an on the ground survey per record description of
 REVISION/ISSUE


 local authorities for building lines established by local ordinaces. the land shown hereon was performed on Nov. 10, 2025 and that the map or plat hereon drawn is
 *Compare all points before building and report any difference a correct representation of said survey. When bearings are shown the bearing base is assumed.
 immediately. *Assume no dimension from scaling upon this plat.
 Dimensions are shown in feet and hundredths and are correct at a temperature of 68° Fahrenheit.
 *AutoCad file will not be provided under this contract.
 Scale: 1 Inch equals 15 Feet.
 ,./
 PRINTED: 11/18/2025 15:14:05
 Dated this 10th day of November 2025 5 REVISIONS 11.18.2025
 Ordered By: Nathan Kriska . 4 REVISIONS 04.10.2025
 John M. Henriksen P.L.S. #2668 (exp.11/30/2026) Professional Design Firm Land Surveying LLC (#184.005417)
 Order Number: 8041C . This professional service conforms to current Illinois minimum standards for a boundary survey. 3 REVISIONS 03.31.2025
 2 PERMIT ISSUE 03.13.2025
 1 PROGRESS 02.25.2025
 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE


 SHEET TITLE

 SITE PLAN


 PROJECT NUMBER 140 2025
 SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N. KRISKA
 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER




ã 2025 COPYRIGHT - NK ARCHITECT
 DRAWN BY K. KRETOWICZ
 CHECKED BY N. KRISKA

 SHEET NUMBER



 SP-1
 FIRE RESTORATION
 AND REMODELING
 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
 8041 TRIPP AVE
 SKOKIE IL




 NK ARCHITECT
 NATHAN KRISKA
 3322 DEMPSTER STREET
 SKOKIE, IL 60076
 TEL. 847-983-8383




 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS
 WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
 AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
 BELIEF, THEY COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THE BUILDING CODE OF THE SKOKIE IL
 AND THE LAWS OF THE ILLINOIS .




 11/18/2025

 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF RECORD DATE




 SED ARCHIT
 N
 LIC T
 E EC
 NATHAN KRISKA
 001-013484
 EXP.
 11.30.2026 IS
 ST  AT O
 E O F ILLI N



 PROJECT CONSULTANTS




 REVISION/ISSUE




 PRINTED: 11/18/2025 15:14:15
 5 REVISIONS 11.18.2025
 4 REVISIONS 04.10.2025
 3 REVISIONS 03.31.2025
 2 PERMIT ISSUE 03.13.2025
 1 PROGRESS 02.25.2025
 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE


 SHEET TITLE

 EXISTING ELEVATIONS


 PROJECT NUMBER 140 2025
 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N. KRISKA
 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER




ã 2025 COPYRIGHT - NK ARCHITECT
 DRAWN BY K. KRETOWICZ
 CHECKED BY N. KRISKA

 SHEET NUMBER



 A-3
 FIRE RESTORATION
 AND REMODELING
 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
 8041 TRIPP AVE
 SKOKIE IL




 NK ARCHITECT
 NATHAN KRISKA
 3322 DEMPSTER STREET
 SKOKIE, IL 60076
 TEL. 847-983-8383




 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS
 WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION
 AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND
 BELIEF, THEY COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
 THE BUILDING CODE OF THE SKOKIE IL
 AND THE LAWS OF THE ILLINOIS .




 11/18/2025

 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER OF RECORD DATE




 SED ARCHIT
 N
 LIC T
 E EC
 NATHAN KRISKA
 001-013484
 EXP.
 11.30.2026 IS
 ST  AT O
 E O F ILLI N



 PROJECT CONSULTANTS




 REVISION/ISSUE




 PRINTED: 11/18/2025 15:14:15
 5 REVISIONS 11.18.2025
 4 REVISIONS 04.10.2025
 3 REVISIONS 03.31.2025
 2 PERMIT ISSUE 03.13.2025
 1 PROGRESS 02.25.2025
 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE


 SHEET TITLE

 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS


 PROJECT NUMBER 140 2025
 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N. KRISKA
 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER




ã 2025 COPYRIGHT - NK ARCHITECT
 DRAWN BY K. KRETOWICZ
 CHECKED BY N. KRISKA

 SHEET NUMBER



 A-4
Back to Agenda
 BUILDING CODE SUMMARY NEW DEMODELING NEW DEMODELING
 SINGEL FAMILY HOUSE GENERAL DEMOLITION NOTE:
 1. BEFORE ANY DEMOLITION OR EXCAVATION WORK, THE OWNER AGENT OR CONTRACTOR
 SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITIES HAVING SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SUCH
 SINGEL FAMILY
 HOUSE
 AS WATER, ELECTRIC, GAS, SEWER, AND OTHER CONNECTIONS.



 9537 N. KEELER AVE.
 2. WHENEVER A STRUCTURE IS DEMOLISHED OR REMOVED, THE PREMISES SHALL BE
 MAINTAINED FREE FROM ALL UNSAFE OR HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS BY THE PROPER
 REGULATION OF THE LOT, RESTORATION OF ESTABLISHED GRADES AND THE ERECTION OF
 THE NECESSARY RETAINING WALLS AND FENCES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF

 SKOKIE,IL,60076 THE PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC OR WORKERS FROM HEALTH OR OTHER HAZARDS INVOLVED
 IN DEMOLITION, MINING AND OTHER PROCESSES AND OPERATIONS. PROJECT ADDRESS
 3. WHERE THE REMOVAL OF ANY MATERIAL WILL CAUSE ON EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF DUST, 9537 N. KEELER AVE.
 SUCH MATERIAL SHALL BE WET DOWN TO PREVENT THE CREATION OF A NUISANCE.
 SKOKIE,IL,60076
 4. ALL PARTS OF BUILDING UNDER DEMOLITION, ERECTION OR REPAIR SHALL BE ADEQUATELY
 LIGHTED. THE INTENSITY OF FLOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 3 FOOTCANDLES (32.29
 LUX).


 REFERENCE SYMBOLS 5. PROPER PRECAUTIONS SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID ALL RISK OF FIRE OR EXPLOSION, AND
 FLAMMABLE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS SHALL NOT BE STORED IN THE VICINITY OF WELDING
 OR CUTTING OPERATIONS.

 6. MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE DROPPED BY GRAVITY OR THROWN OUTSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALLS
 OF BUILDING DURING DEMOLITION OR REPAIR. WOOD OR METAL CHUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 FOR THE REMOVAL OF SUCH MATERIALS. 3322 DEMPSTER ST.
 SKOKIE,IL,60076
 7. AFTER DEMOLITION AND EXCAVATION WORK, CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN UP ENTIRE
 DEBREE.

 8. ADJOINING PROPERTY SHALL BE COMPLETELY PROTECTED FROM ANY DAMAGE INCIDENTAL
 TO THE BUILDING OPERATION WHEN THE OWNER OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY PERMITS FREE
 ACCESS TO THE BUILDING AT ALL REASONABLE TIMES TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY I HERE BY CERTIFY THAT THESE DOCUMENTS
 SAFEGUARDS. WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT
 SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY
 9. ALL FLOOR AND WALL OPENINGS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SUBSTANTIAL GUARDRAIL AND KNOWLEDGE AND
 TOE BOARDS. BELIEF, THEY COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS
 OF THE BUILDING CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF
 SKOKIE AND THE LAWS OF THE ILLINOIS
 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO CONFORM TO OSHA STANDARDS

 11. CONTRACTOR TO KEEP FIRE EXTINGUISHERS ON JOB-SITE AS FOLLOWS: WATER: ONE PER
 FLOOR. 2.5 GALLON CAPACITY DRY CHEMICAL: ONE PER FLOOR. 10 LB CAPACITY EFFECTIVE ON
 GLASS A (FLAMMABLE MATERIALS)
 GLASS B (FLAMMABLE SOLVENTS)
 GLASS C (ELECTRICAL FIRES)




 INDEX OF DRAWINGS

 REVISION/ISSUE

 PER
 1MIT 02/1
 2/8026




 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE

 SHEET TITLE

 GANARIL INFORMATION & NOTES




 PROJECT NUMBER 0907025

 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N.KRISKA

 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

 DRAWN BY E.S.

 CHECKED BY N.KRISKA

 SHEET NUMBER




C
A
O
RC
 P
 T
 Y
 EIH
 G
 N
 R C
 K
 H
 T-2
 T c
 0 A-1.0
 NEW DEMODELING
 SINGEL FAMILY
 131.15' HOUSE
 3.19' 3.20'
 6'-13 5'-115 8.20'
 4" 8"
 24'-57
 8"
 38.03'
 L O T#9 FRAME
 7.94'
 SHED
 PROJECT ADDRESS
 13.67' 13.20'
 5.49'
 9537 N. KEELER AVE.
 CONCRETE SKOKIE,IL,60076




 16' PUBLIC ALLEY
 2.96'
 1" 3.50'


 2.22' 3.29'




 KEELER AVE.
 24'-78

 AREA
 55.00'
 1.76' CONCRETE
 0.22' 1&2 STORY

 55.00'
 BASEMENT
 2.84' STAIRS
 BRICK & FRAME
 2.61'
 w/BASEMENT
 0.67'
 3322 DEMPSTER ST.



 CONCRETE
 SKOKIE,IL,60076




 8' VACATED
 #9537
 17.05' 22.24' FRAME
 WOOD
 L O T#10
 0.67' 37.18'
 2.61'
 25'-8"


 CONCRETE
 11'-43 11'-63
 4" 8"
 DRIVEWAY




 131.15'

 7222.03 SQ. FT.
 L O T#11
 EXISTING SITE PLAN
 N SCALE: 3/32" = 1' - 0"




 131.15'
 1" 3.19' 3.20'
 6'-13 5'-108 8.20'
 4"
 24'-57
 8"
 53.625'
 L O T#9 FRAME
 7.94'
 SHED

 13.67'
 5.49'
 13.84'
 PATIO
 CONCRETE




 16' PUBLIC ALLEY
 1" 3.50'


 2.22' 3.29'




 KEELER AVE.
 24'-78

 AREA
 55.00'
 7.19'
 0.22' 1&2 STORY
 37.54'
 55.00'
 2.84' BRICK & FRAME
 2.61' w/BASEMENT
 0.67'
 REVISION/ISSUE




 CONCRETE
 #9537
 L O T#10 PER
 1MIT 02/1
 2/8026




 8' VACATED
 17.05'
 8'-0" 18'




 0.67'
 2.61' 50.13'
 25'-8"
 PARKING 18'

 CONCRETE NEW NO. DESCRIPTION DATE

 11'-5"
 DRIVEWAY 9' DRIVEWAY SHEET TITLE

 EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE PLANS

 78'-9"

 1'-4"
 131.15' PROJECT NUMBER

 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
 0907025

 N.KRISKA

 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER




 7222.03 SQ. FT.
 L O T#11 DRAWN BY

 CHECKED BY
 E.S.

 N.KRISKA

 SHEET NUMBER
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
C
A
O
RC
 P
 T
 Y
 EIH
 G
 N
 R C
 K
 H
 T-2
 T c
 0
 N SCALE: 3/32" = 1' - 0"
 A-2.0
 NEW DEMODELING
 SINGEL FAMILY
 HOUSE

 T/ O. ROOF 3
 +22-0"
 3 1
 EXISTING ROOF 1


 T/ O. ROOF
 +22-0" 3
 T/ PLATE
 PROJECT ADDRESS
 3 1 +18'-5 "
 EXISTING ROOF
 1
 EX.
 9537 N. KEELER AVE.
 SKOKIE,IL,60076
 T/ PLATE
 +18'-5 "

 EX. EX.



 EXISTING
 SIDING




 3322 DEMPSTER ST.
 T/ PLATE
 EXISTING
 SIDING +9'-2 12"
 SKOKIE,IL,60076

 EX. EX.
 EX.
 EXISTING
 T/ PLATE BRICK
 +9'-2 12"
 EXISTING
 LIMTSTONE
 EX. EX.



 EXISTING
 STONE
 T/ FOUND.
 +1'-2"
 T/ FOUND.
 +0'-6"
 GRADE
 EXISTING +0'-0"
 BRICK
 T/ FOUND.
 +1'-2" EXISTING
 T/ FOUND. FOUNDATION
 +0'-6"
 GRADE
 +0'-0"



 EXISTING
 FOUNDATION




 1 EXISTING FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"


 2 EXISTING SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"




 EXISTING ROOF
 T/ O. ROOF
 +22-0" 3 3 T/ O. ROOF 3
 1 3
 1 +22-0"
 1 1
 EXISTING ROOF


 T/ PLATE
 +18'-5 "
 T/ PLATE
 EX. +18'-5 "

 EX.




 EXISTING
 SIDING




 EXISTING ROOF
 T/ PLATE
 +9'-2 12"
 T/ PLATE
 +9'-2 21"
 EX. REVISION/ISSUE
 EXISTING 02/1
 2/8026
 EX. EX. PER
 1MIT
 BRICK EX.


 EXISTING
 GLASS BLOCK
 TO BE REMOVE
 EXISTING 42" HT GUARDRAIL
 w/ SPINDLES @ 4" o.c.



 T/ FOUND. EXISTING
 +1'-2" BRICK
 T/ FOUND. T/ FOUND.
 +0'-6" +1'-2"
 GRADE T/ FOUND.
 +0'-0" +0'-6"
 GRADE
 +0'-0"
 EXISTING
 CONCRETE STIRES NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
 EXISTING
 FOUNDATION
 SHEET TITLE

 EXISTING
 ELEVATIONS



 PROJECT NUMBER 0907025

 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N.KRISKA

 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER
 4 EXISTING SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATION DRAWN BY E.S.
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 3 EXISTING BACK (EATS) ELEVATION CHECKED BY N.KRISKA
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
 SHEET NUMBER




C
A
O
RC
 P
 T
 Y
 EIH
 G
 N
 R C
 K
 H
 T-2
 T c
 0 A-7.0
 NEW DEMODELING
 SINGEL FAMILY
 T/ O. FOOR T/ O. FOOR HOUSE
 +25-4 41" 3 +25-4 41"

 NEW ROOF 1
 3
 1 3 3
 1 1
 1" 1" NEW ROOF
 6'-114 3 6'-114
 NEW ROOF 1
 PROJECT ADDRESS
 9537 N. KEELER AVE.
 T/ PLATE T/ PLATE
 +18'-5 " +18'-5 " SKOKIE,IL,60076
 3648 2424 3648 3648 4836 4836 4868 4868
 ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE
 WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW




 NEW SIDING EXISTING
 SIDING
 3322 DEMPSTER ST.
 SKOKIE,IL,60076
 T/ PLATE T/ PLATE
 +9'-2 21" +9'-2 21"


 3648 3648 EX. EX.
 ESCAPE ESCAPE EX.
 EXISTING WINDOW WINDOW EXISTING
 BRICK BRICK

 EXISTING
 LIMTSTONE
 42" HT GUARDRAIL w/
 SPINDLES @ 4" o.c.

 4x4 WOOD POST EXISTING
 STONE
 T/ FOUND. T/ FOUND.
 +1'-2" +1'-2"
 T/ FOUND. T/ FOUND.
 +0'-6" +0'-6"
 GRADE GRADE
 +0'-0" +0'-0"



 EXISTING 10"x42" CONCRETE EXISTING
 FOUNDATION FOUNDATION
 PIER
 NEW CONCRETE
 FOUNDATION




 2 PROPOSED SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION 1 PROPOSED FRONT (WEST) ELEVATION
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"




 T/ O. FOOR T/ O. FOOR
 3 +25-4 14" +25-4 41"
 1
 3 3 3
 1 1 1
 1" 1"
 6'-114
 NEW ROOF
 NEW ROOF 3 6'-114
 1



 T/ PLATE T/ PLATE
 +18'-5 " +18'-5 "
 3648 3648 3648 3648 3648
 3620 ESCAPE ESCAPE 3620 ESCAPE ESCAPE ESCAPE 3620
 WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW




 NEW SIDING


 NEW SIDING NEW SIDING




 T/ PLATE T/ PLATE
 +9'-2 12" +9'-2 21"
 REVISION/ISSUE
 EXISTING
 BRICK EX.
 4642 PER
 1MIT 02/1
 2/8026
 7280
 EXISTING EXISTING
 BRICK BRICK



 42" HT GUARDRAIL w/
 SPINDLES @ 4" o.c.
 42" HT GUARDRAIL w/
 SPINDLES @ 4" o.c.
 4x4 WOOD POST
 T/ FOUND. T/ FOUND. 4x4 WOOD POST
 +1'-2" +1'-2"
 T/ FOUND. T/ FOUND.
 +0'-6" +0'-6"
 GRADE GRADE
 +0'-0" +0'-0"

 NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
 10"x42" CONCRETE EXISTING EXISTING 10"x42" CONCRETE
 FOUNDATION FOUNDATION
 PIER PIER SHEET TITLE

 PROPOSED
 ELEVATIONS
 10"x42" CONCRETE
 FOUNDATION
 PROJECT NUMBER 0907025

 PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE N.KRISKA

 PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER

 DRAWN BY E.S.
 4 PROPOSED SIDE (NORTH) ELEVATION 3 PROPOSED BACK (EATS) ELEVATION CHECKED BY N.KRISKA
 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
 SHEET NUMBER




C
A
O
RC
 P
 T
 Y
 EIH
 G
 N
 R C
 K
 H
 T-2
 T c
 0 A-8.0
 Back to Agenda
 Village of Skokie
 APPEARANCE COMMISSION APPLICATION
 VUlag,t of Community Development Department - Building & Inspection Services Division

  SKOKIE 5127 Oakton St. Skokie, IL 60077
 Phone 847/933-8223
 The Appearance Commission meets the :Z,,d Wednesday* of each month at 7:30 p.m.
 *Unless otherwise noted
 Applications will only be accepted in a PDF format.


APPLICATION DATE: _ 1/28/26
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

APPLICATION TYPE (Please check all that apphl
D New Construction D 1 Floor Addition LJ 2 Floor Addition
 st nd
 ~ Far,;;ade D Signage D Other
LAND USE:
D Single Family Residential D Multifamily Residential D Mixed Use DX Commercial D Industrial D Other
 5013-19
SUBJECT ADDRESS: _ _ ____  OAKTON,
 ____ SKOKIE
 __  IL.
 __ 60077
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

OWNER INFORMATION: Please print legibly.
 ROBERT
NAME($): _ _ FITZPATRICK
 _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
 5017
ADDRESS: _ ___OAKTON,
 ____ SKOKIE
 ___  IL._ _ _ _ _ CITY, STATE ZIP: _
 60077
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
PHONE#: EMAIL: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

AGENT/PETITIONER INFORMATION (if other than owner):
NAME(S): _ANTHONY
 _ _ _ _ROWE
 ___ & _KEVIN SMITH
remov

 621
ADDRESS: _ _E.100TH
 ____ PL._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CITY, STATE ZIP:CHICAGO
 _ _ _ _ IL.
 __  60628
 _ _ _ _ __
PHONE#: _ _ __ EMAIL: __
Please submit the following PDFs to appearance@skokie.org to complete your digital-only application:
 1. Elevations, floor plans, and site plans. Scale ¼'' = 1'-0" is preferred, but not required. If the file size is greater
 than 5MB, multiple emails are allowed. Ensure "Appearance Commission PDF" and the project's property
 address are in the subject line of the email. Color elevations or one color rendering is required.
 2. Completed Zoning Information Worksheet (residential projects only)
 3. Photographs (all sides of the subject building and the fronts of neighboring buildings)
 4. Excerpts of brochures and/or cut sheets of new materials and colors proposed for the project. Matching
 existing materials and colors can be confirmed with the submitted photographs.
 5. Plat of Survey
Does your project include a green roof? Yes D No CEs3'
* If your project includes a green roof you will placed at or near the top of the agenda.

 Fee Schedule
 Residential Site (new) ... $100 plus $50.00 per unit
 Non-Residential Site* (new) .. . $100 plus $50.00 per 1,000 square feet (based on square footage of building)
 • Any non-residentially zoned site (Business, Industrial, Mixed-Use districts)
 Any Other Appearance Review (Additions, Facade, Sign Package, etc.). .. $50.00
 If you have already paid for a preliminary plan review there is no charge.
 For Office Use Only:
 ca:ie Number _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Meeting Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

 Acct# NR Amt$ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Cash/ Credit Card/ Check# _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __


VOSDOCS-#149808-v18-Appearance_ Commission_Application_form Revised 12/12125
 76' - 9"




 008 E- P L AN ST AMP :




 WALL LEGEND
 NEW INTERIOR DRYWALL CONSTRUCTION· 5/11' GYP. BD. TYPE 'X'
 EA. SIDES ON EXISTING 2X4 WD. STUDS@ 16' O,C, • UL DESIGN
 IU-305 (1 HR)

= EXISTING EXTERIOR WALLS -EXISTING MASONRY CONSTRUCTION
= EXISTING INTERIOR DRYWALL CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN
 15' - 9" 13' • 3"

 CD : : 20' - 2" 8' · 9"
 0 ~),!_.!'---- - - -- -- - - - ---.!11'------ - ?f- Management
 N d]\Q:
 .... o.~ Architects &

 oi NOTE:
 FIRE SPRINKLE&SYSTEM I
 /
 ,,.-----
 \
 Construction Managers
 621 East 100th Place
 & DRAWINGS BY OTHERS ~NISEX BA/ H Chicago, Illinois 60628
 ,, __ ~/ 0
 ..... p1: 1-773-428-6870
 .... p2: 1-31 2-953-0710
 (Cl fax: 1-773-785-3254
 s:t
 0
 ....
 ;:....
 LO
 1-STORY BRICK 1• STORY BRICK 1-STORY BRICK
 1• STORY BRICK COMM. BUILDING COMM. BUILDING COMM. BUILDING
 COMM. BUILDING #5017 #5015 #5013
 #5019
 1754 SF 1097 SF 771 SF
 0
 r--
 906SF \ 0 I
 I
 ' ..... __ ,,,,.
 I
 /




 G




 1
 A




 7' - 1O"




 No. DeKr1p1Jon
 ISSUED FOR PHASE 1



 UMP ROOM




 I
 /
 :
 ' \
 NOTE: ALL REAR EXIT DOORS & MECt-WJICAL ROOM
 BATH~ '
 DOORS SHALL BE CLASS '8" SEE A6.00




 STAMPfSEAL: STAMP/SEAL :


 FIRST FLOOR
 PLAN



 A1.00
5013-19 OAKTON, SKOKIE IL. EXISTING FACADE NORTH ELEVATION
1/16/26, 12:41 PM lnbox -Anthony Rowe - Outlook




 5013-19 OAKTON, SKOKIE IL. EXISTING REAR SOUTH ELEVATION.
 THE REAR OF 5009 OAKTON IS ON THE RIGHT OF THE PHOTO &
 THE PARTIAL VIEW OF 5021 OAKTON IS SHOWN TO THE LEFT ON
 THE PHOTO.




https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AAQapDS2erEe1RC0httlXLwAl%2B1293gAA/sxs/AAkAL... 1/1
THE ADJACENT BUILDING TO THE LEFT (EAST) OF 5013-19 OAKTON IS
5009 OAKTON, SKOKIE IL.
THE (3) BUILDING ADDRESSES TO THE WEST OF 5013-19 OAKTON THAT
ARE ADJACENT, IS 5021, 5023 AND 5025 OAKTON, SKOKIE iL.
 008 E-PLAN S T AldP :




 Management
 Architects &
 Construction Managers
 621 East 100th Place
 Chicago, llllnols 60628
 p1: 1-773-428-6870
 p2: 1-312-953-0710
 fax: 1-773-785-3254



 SMOOTH FACE 12''X12'X3/8" PLATE THAU BOLT
 ARCHITEC1lJRAL BLOCK THAU MASONRY WALL W/ (4) 5/8'
 A307 BOLTS , woob -r0M.E \
 MODULAR SIZE BRICK : NE~116 GA. METAL GAU.GE 1' ROD WELDED TO 12"X12''X3/8' FIRERATED MODERN EXTERIOR;_~ .l§:7JJ... S(i) lH4,-

 f ~~f~ Reel( TONl:S 1-\.onE\( l?>l!awl'I
 ~pc,~ -PA1t4T PLATE WI 1/ 4" FILLET WELD, SEE
 DETAIL ON A2.01
 Sls◊l?l?l~lfioW/ 16 GA. STAND SEAM SHEET
 !<1ETAL AWNING

 I .J... •
 9' • 0" -
 : 1:...
 1:

 L .




 No,
 1 1 o rORPttASE1




 NEW STOREFRONT WINDOWS AND DOORS, TYP.
G)PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION -t ColoR:3 -r~p. Sol'?>-roSOICJ
  3/8" = 1'-0"




 S T AM P I SE AL :

 NORTH BUILDl: - 1
 ELEVATION~

Meeting Minutes for
 Appearance Commission
 February 11, 2026 | 7:30 PM
Skokie Village Hall | 5127 Oakton Street, Skokie IL 60077 | Council Chambers
 Members Present: Mark Penning, Chair
 Thomas DaMario, Vice Chair
 Joe Maschek
 Charles Isho
 Carlos Ruiz
 Jacob Shapiro
 Jay Pathak
 Members Absent: Julie Naumiak
 Presiding Officer: Angel Schnur, Building & Inspection Services
 Manager
 Staff Present: Jose Acosta, Planning Coordinator
 Others Present:


 1) Time Meeting was Called to Order/Declaration of Quorum

 A quorum being present, Chairman Penning called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM.

 2) Approval of Meeting Minutes

 A motion to approve the minutes of the January 14, 2026 meeting was made by
 Commissioner Shapiro and seconded by Commissioner Pathak. The motion passed
 unanimously with all members voting in favor with one absence.

 3) Old Business

 No Old Business was discussed.

 4) New Business

 2026-003A – 9617 Kildare Ave. (Residential)
 Applicant: Ramon Contreras
 Owner: Saugat Paudel
 Request: 2nd floor addition

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 Staff reported that the applicant proposed a 585 square foot second floor addition above
 the western portion of the existing first floor. The addition was designed to match the
 scale and appearance of the existing structure using similar materials and colors. Staff
 had no objections to the proposal.

 Ramon Contreras, the architect, presented the project, explaining that the addition would
 maintain the existing masonry and match white gutters. The design included siding over
 the existing house, a balcony on the side, and columns creating a canopy for the front
 entrance walkway.

 Commission members discussed several details. Joe noted that the second-floor windows
 appeared to be different sizes and questioned the design choice, which the architect
 explained was due to egress requirements making the windows the same size. Joe also
 pointed out that the stone shown at the back of the stairway should be brick to match
 existing materials.

 Charles inquired about the column selection, noting they appeared to be placeholders.
 Chair Penning suggested using columns similar to those shown in the next case (Lamon
 Avenue project) rather than the fluted columns initially proposed. The architect agreed to
 use non-fluted, square columns with more detail.

 Staff clarified that the bottom of the front elevation would be brick, not stone, and
 confirmed the siding would be vertical Hardy board rather than horizontal.

 Recommendation & Voting
 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented, with the
 stipulation that brick be used at the front entrance on the west elevation, the second-floor
 windows be the same size, and the columns along the colonnade match those from
 applicant 2026-004A at 10014 Lamon Ave.

 Motion: Joe Maschek Second: Thomas DaMario
 Ayes: 7
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 1




 2026-004A – 10014 Lamon Avenue (Residential)
 Applicant & Owner: Abdul and Shamim Samjoo
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.

 Staff reported that the applicant proposed a second-floor addition covering the existing
 first floor footprint, totaling approximately 1,305 square feet. The addition would be


638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 finished with new vinyl siding contrasting with existing first floor brick. The design
 remained compliant with the 51 percent masonry requirement.

 Abdul Samjoo, the homeowner, presented the project, explaining plans to build straight
 up on the existing footprint using herringbone vinyl siding in a neutral color with
 matching graphite shingles.

 Commission members raised concerns about the vinyl siding material. Commissioner
 Maschek noted that while vinyl siding wasn't prohibited, the commission typically
 preferred cementitious siding like Hardy board, particularly for projects under the 51
 percent masonry requirement.

 Commissioner Ruiz questioned the east elevation gable window size, suggesting it be
 enlarged to better match the scale of other windows. Commissioner Maschek agreed,
 noting the disproportionate appearance and suggesting it would provide more natural
 light.

 The commission also discussed adding a canopy over the front door to better direct
 visitors and provide weather protection. Commissioner Maschek mentioned the village
 allows three-foot encroachments into setbacks for such features, though the homeowner
 would need to verify this given his recent zoning board variance.

 Commissioner Isho asked about the patio door's divided lights and whether they would
 match the window style. The homeowner indicated preference for uniformity with the
 windows.

 Commissioner Ruiz recommended using exterior-applied mullions rather than
 sandwiched grids if divided lights were retained, but agreed that matching the single-pane
 window configuration would be more elegant.

 Recommendation & Voting

 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented, with
 provisions for a larger window on the east elevation washroom, the option for an awning
 above the entry door, and consideration of mullion treatment on the upper floor terrace
 doors.

 Motion: Thomas DaMario Second: Jay Pathak
 Ayes: 7
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 1




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 2026-005A – 8041 Tripp Avenue (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Owner: Kevin and Natalia Frampton
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.
 Chair Penning recused himself from this case due to friendship with the property owners,
 and Vice Chair Thomas assumed leadership.

 Staff reported that the applicant proposed a second-floor dormer addition totaling
 approximately 189.5 square feet. The dormer was located within the existing building
 footprint and would match existing materials. Staff noted the dormer appeared somewhat
 disconnected from the existing structure due to offset placement on east and west
 elevations.

 Jeremy Kriska, son of architect Nathan Kriska, represented the project as his father had
 an emergency requiring hospitalization. Jeremy had limited knowledge of the project
 details.

 Commission members identified several concerns with the drawings. Joe noted
 inconsistencies in ridge lines between elevations, with the dormer addition extending
 above the existing ridge line on east and west elevations while aligning properly on north
 and south elevations. He also questioned the offset positioning of the dormer elements.

 Commissioner Ruiz observed that the gable ending of the dormer didn't complement the
 bungalow's hip roof style, suggesting a gentler slope would reduce the dormer's scale. He
 also recommended recessing the rear elevation dormer rather than extending it to the
 wall.

 Given the complexity of the technical issues and the architect's absence, the commission
 determined that Nathan Kriska's expertise was needed to address the concerns properly.

 Recommendation & Voting

 A motion was made table further discussion on this case. The case was postponed until
 the project architect could answer the Commissioner’s questions and concerns about
 ridge lines, offset positioning, and dormer design compatibility with the existing
 bungalow style.

 Motion: Thomas DaMario Second: Carlos Ruiz
 Ayes: 6
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 1




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 2026-005A – 9537 Keeler Avenue (Residential)
 Applicant: Nathan Kriska
 Owner: Menachem and Feige
 Request: 2nd Floor Addition

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.

 Staff reported concerns about whether the 51 percent masonry requirement was met, as
 the second-floor addition appeared slightly taller than the existing first floor. Staff
 recommended incorporating additional brick on the west elevation and noted that the
 addition would be finished entirely in vinyl siding.

 The case presentation was complicated by the architect Nathan Kriska's absence due to
 emergency, with his son Jeremy noting that Nathan had recommended brick siding for
 the second-floor addition on the front facade to meet the 50 percent masonry requirement.

 Menachem, the property owner, clarified design details. Commission members worked to
 understand the relationship between the existing structure and proposed addition, with
 Commissioner Maschek helping interpret the drawings to show how the addition would
 align with existing setbacks.

 Extensive discussion focused on materials and proportions. Commissioner Maschek
 expressed preference for the vertical siding as presented rather than adding brick patches,
 stating it would complement the mid-century character of the house. He suggested that if
 the second floor used consistent cementitious or Hardy siding, he would not object to less
 than 51 percent masonry.

 Chair Penning agreed with keeping the existing siding approach rather than adding brick
 elements that might not serve the design well. The commission discussed ensuring proper
 material matching between new and existing siding.

 Commissioner Ruiz emphasized the importance of exactly matching existing siding
 dimensions, spacing, and texture, whether through refurbishment of existing material
 combined with new matching material, or complete replacement with consistent new
 siding.

 Commissioner Isho noted discrepancies between the owner's understanding, the narrative
 description, and the drawings, suggesting the need for clearer documentation. However,
 after discussion, the commission felt comfortable proceeding with the owner's
 commitment to exact material matching.




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 The commission also suggested considering a more appropriate front door that would
 better complement the mid-century aesthetic of the house.
 Recommendation & Voting

 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented, subject to the
 requirements that the second-floor siding be vertical seam product which matches exactly
 or closely approximates the existing siding, that the architect resubmit drawings to staff
 clearly indicating the correct orientation of the second floor, that comments have been
 addressed including the front door, and waiving the 51 percent masonry requirement.

 Motion: Jacob Shapiro Second: Jay Pathak
 Ayes: 7
 Nays: 0
 Absent: 1


 2026-007A – 5013 Oakton Avenue (Non-Residential)
 Applicant: Anthony Rowe and Kevin Smith
 Owner: Robert Fitzpatrick
 Request: Façade

 Discussion & Interested Parties
 Staff comments were read into the record.

 Staff reported that the applicant proposed modifications to the north elevation including
 new storefront windows and doors, metal awning, and updated exterior finishes. The
 design incorporated mixed brick tones, smooth face architectural block, and modern
 metal siding. Staff had no objections but noted signage was not part of this proposal.
 Anthony Rowe, representing Dewey's Barbecue, presented the design featuring cam clad
 vertical material (100 percent recyclable, NFPA rated), removal of exterior limestone to
 be replaced with glazed modular brick, and a color-coordinated metal canopy with ice
 breaks for pedestrian safety.

 Robert Fitzpatrick, the building owner, explained his intention to recreate his father's 50-
 year-old barbecue restaurant from East Texas, with the red glazed brick complementing
 his restaurant's logo and branding.

 Chair Penning expressed appreciation for the investment in downtown Skokie but raised
 concerns about the design approach. He felt the current limestone facade, while dated,
 had permanence and substance. He questioned whether the proposed storefront windows
 were large enough for a downtown application and felt the wood siding appeared more
 suburban than urban, potentially too trendy for the permanent downtown location.




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 Commissioner Maschek initially supported the limestone facade restoration, noting its
 attractive qualities despite rough condition. However, after hearing the owner's
 explanation about the restaurant concept and concerns about maintenance with cooking
 smoke, he became supportive of the glazed brick approach, particularly appreciating the
 "terracotta" quality of the red brick.

 Extensive discussion developed around material choices and layout. Commissioner
 DaMario suggested flipping the materials to place red glazed brick at street level with
 vinyl siding above for a more appropriate scale and better sign visibility. Commissioner
 Shapiro agreed this would make the red accent pop while providing better backdrop for
 signage.

 Commissioner Ruiz advocated for restoring the existing limestone through proper
 chemical cleaning rather than removal, emphasizing sustainability and the quality of the
 existing material. He suggested concentrating design efforts at the pedestrian level while
 maintaining the historical limestone above.

 The commission ultimately supported a compromise approach: testing the structural
 integrity of the existing limestone with preference for restoration, but allowing Chicago
 common brick as an alternative if the limestone proved unsafe. The red glazed brick
 would be relocated to street level, and storefront windows would be enlarged for better
 downtown presence.

 Commissioner Maschek noted that this solution would provide the owner's desired red
 elements while using more appropriate downtown materials like common brick, and
 would be more leasable if the restaurant eventually relocated.
 Recommendation & Voting

 A motion was made to grant a Certificate of Appropriateness as presented, with the
 condition of providing larger storefront windows, red glaze brick on the street level rather
 than the upper level, testing the safety and security of existing limestone (preferred for
 upper level), and if limestone is deemed unsafe, Chicago common brick would be
 appropriate for the upper level.

 Motion: Joe Maschek Second: Jacob Shapiro
 Ayes: 6
 Nays: 1
 Absent: 1



 5) Communication from Staff

 No staff communications were presented.


638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026
 6) Public Comment

 No Public Comment was provided.

 7) Adjourn

 Motion to Adjourn was made by Commissioner Ruiz and seconded by Commissioner
 Pathak. The motion passed unanimously.

 Meeting adjourned at 9:16 PM


Respectfully Submitted

Jose Acosta,
Planning Coordinator




638477 – Appearance Commission Minutes – February 11, 2026