City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-09-28
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Wednesday, September 28,
 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS­DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 1
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings


The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621­
CITY (Metro), (818) 904­9450 (Valley), (310) 471­CITY (Westside), and (310) 547­CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or
audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.


Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in­person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in­person,
only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid­19
vaccination or of a negative Covid­19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any
purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test
provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid­19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives,
indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be
submitted at LACouncilComment.com.


Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978­1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.


Telecommunication Relay Services


Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in
technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing,
and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer­to­peer and third­party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.


Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers ­ generally telephone companies ­ are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.


What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY­Based TRS; Speech­to­Speech Relay Service; Shared Non­English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications­relay­service­trs.


Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is
the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a
person who is deaf, hard­of­hearing, or has a speech disability.


For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 2
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES


AGENDAS ­ The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings
contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the
Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles,
CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.


Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not
listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two­thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an
Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special"
by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda
have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak
on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.


The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The
Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If
anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by
Council with one roll call vote.


PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ­ An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for
which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda
Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute
per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a
reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.


The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to
one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not
discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.


If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant­At­Arms with
35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 3
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES ­ If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may
require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978­
1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.


COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS ­ Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the
Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original
motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.


A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion
will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.


VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS ­ Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will
require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted.
Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If
an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for
approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8)
affirmative votes upon second consideration.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 4
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for
or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of
Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an
intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of
the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular
meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file
number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative
vote of eight (8) members of the Council.


When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or
has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the
purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.


The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­1277
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code (LAAC) to designate the director of the Climate
 Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) within the Department of Public
 Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 5
motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward
the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.


RULE 16 MOTIONS ­ Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having
to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council
session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM
Roll Call


Approval of the Minutes


Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­1277
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code (LAAC) to designate the director of the Climate
 Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) within the Department of Public
 Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. NOTE and FILE the July 29, 2022 Emergency Management
 Department report relative to opportunities to improve the network of
 cooling centers in the City.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the
 LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department
 of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 6
 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the
 LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department
 of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Echo Park Neighborhood Council



(2) 22­0840
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­010 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) which approves the Arizona
 Nuclear Power Project (ANPP) Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection
 Agreement.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Interconnection
 Agreement is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
 15060(c)(3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not
 subject to CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project.
 Section 15378(b)(5) states that organizational or administrative
 activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in
 the environment do not meet that definition. Therefore, approving the
 Interconnection Agreement is not subject to CEQA.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­010, which approves the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement among the Co­Owners of the ANPP
 Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los
 Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No.
 BP 21­011.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement, LADWP No. BP 21­011, by and among
 Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public
 Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project Agricultural
 Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison,
 Wednesday Southern  California28,
 - September Public
 2022Power
 - Authority, the City,
 PAGE acting
 7 by and
 through the LADWP; and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC; and,
 Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los
 Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No.
 BP 21­011.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement, LADWP No. BP 21­011, by and among
 Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public
 Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project Agricultural
 Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison,
 Southern California Public Power Authority, the City, acting by and
 through the LADWP; and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC; and,
 delegating to the Board authority to amend the Agreement.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no new
 or additional fiscal impact to the Power Revenue Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed action
 complies with the LADWP's Financial Policies in that funding is available
 for this purpose.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(3) 14­0737­S1
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­009 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the South State
 Water Project (SWP) Hydropower Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 (FERC) Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Cost Sharing
 Agreement itself, is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)
 (3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not subject to
 CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section
 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities which do not
 involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a
 potentially significant physical impact on the environment do not
 meet the definition of a "project" under the CEQA Guidelines.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­009, approving the SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­
 2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by
 Wednesday and through the Los
 - September 28, Angeles
 2022 - Department of Water
 PAGEand8 Power
 (LADWP), and the California Department of Water Resources as
 CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section
 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities which do not
 involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a
 potentially significant physical impact on the environment do not
 meet the definition of a "project" under the CEQA Guidelines.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­009, approving the SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­
 2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by
 and through the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
 (LADWP), and the California Department of Water Resources as
 co­licensees of the South SWP Hydropower Project, LADWP
 Agreement No. BP 21­001.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 August 4, 2022, approving the South SWP Hydropower FERC
 Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the
 City, acting by and through the LADWP, and the California
 Department of Water Resources as co­licensees of the South SWP
 Hydropower Project, LADWP Agreement No. BP 21­001; and,
 delegating to the Board limited authority to amend said Agreement.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that the proposed Cost Sharing Agreement will authorize on­going annual
 FERC license charges, and up to $43.13 million in additional new costs
 for implementation of the protection, mitigation, and enhancement
 (PM&E) measures identified. Approximately, $2,748,100 in funding is
 budgeted in the 2022­23 Power Revenue Fund Proposed Budget for the
 license charges and additional funding will be provided in subsequent
 budgets for the protection, mitigation, and enhancement measures.
 Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact
 on the City's General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(4) 22­0921
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­036 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the Haynes
 Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 Wednesday 1. FIND -that in
 September 28, 2022
 accordance - the California Environmental
 with PAGE 9 Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Haynes Unit 8 Retrofit
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­036 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the Haynes
 Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Haynes Unit 8 Retrofit
 Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)
 (2). In accordance with Section 15060(c)(2), an activity is not subject
 to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable
 indirect physical change in the environment. The approval of this
 Ordinance will authorize the use of the competitive sealed bid
 proposal method to let a contract, and will not result in any physical
 change in the environment; therefore, the proposed action is not
 subject to CEQA.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of August 9, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­036, approving the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled
 Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 25, 2022, authorizing the Board to award an agreement
 pursuant to a competitive sealed proposal method, permitting
 negotiations relating to the engineering, procurement, and
 construction of a wet cooling system consisting of a cooling tower
 and associated infrastructure, integration of new cooling system with
 existing equipment, addition of a station service voltage transformer,
 demolition of once­through­cooling piping and associated
 equipment, modernization of the existing stormwater and
 wastewater systems, and hazardous material abatement and
 disposal as required, as part of the Haynes Generating Station Unit
 8 Recycled Water Cooling System Retrofit Project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will not have a fiscal impact.
 However, the ensuing contract will result in a total expenditure estimated at
 $130 million. Funding will be provided from the Power Revenue Fund's
 Adopted Budget for this Project in subsequent years should it be
 approved. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have
 no impact on the City’s General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 10
 $130 million. Funding will be provided from the Power Revenue Fund's
 Adopted Budget for this Project in subsequent years should it be
 approved. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have
 no impact on the City’s General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(5) 20­1536
 ORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Los
 Angeles Municipal Code to clarify the definition of outdoor advertising
 structure, and to exempt certain approved structures from the prohibition of
 outdoor advertising structures in the public right­of­way.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council
 West Hills Neighborhood Council
 Mar Vista Community Council
 Westwood Neighborhood Council
 Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council
 Against:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council
 Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council
 For if Amended:
 West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council
 Del Rey Neighborhood Council
 Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council
 Sun Valley Area Neighborhood Council
 Neutral Position:
 Reseda Neighborhood Council


 (Public Works Committee report adopted at Council meeting of
 September 20, 2022)


(6) 20­1426
 CD 14 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and ORDINANCE
 FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan Amendment (GPA),
 and Zone Change (ZC) for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey
 Road; 5800­5814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 11
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 (Public Works Committee report adopted at Council meeting of
 September 20, 2022)


(6) 20­1426
 CD 14 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and ORDINANCE
 FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan Amendment (GPA),
 and Zone Change (ZC) for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey
 Road; 5800­5814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
 (CEQA) Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the
 administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV­
 2021­8629­ND, and all comments received, there is no substantial
 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
 environment; FIND the Negative Declaration reflects the
 independent judgment and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the
 Negative Declaration.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the
 Mayor and the LACPC, APPROVING a GPA to the Northeast Los
 Angeles Community Plan from Low Medium II Residential to
 Neighborhood Commercial for the subject properties.


 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 May 26, 20222, to effectuate a ZC from RD1.5­1 to [Q}C4­1VL for
 the subject properties; the action is in response to Motion (de León
 – Price), Council file No. 20­1426, which requests that the General
 Plan Land Use and Zoning of these properties be corrected to
 reflect existing built conditions and to facilitate the reuse of existing
 commercial buildings in the Hermon neighborhood, the GPA and ZC
 does not involve the demolition, remodel, construction, or alteration
 of any structures, public facilities, or land; for the properties located
 at 5715 North Monterey Road; 58005814 North Monterey Road; and
 5321 East Via Marisol, subject to Conditions of Approval.


 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General
 Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action.


 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code
 Section 12.32 G:

 Wednesday . . . t h -e C o u
 September 28,a y2022
 ncil m d e c- i d e t o i m p o s e a p
 PAGE  12a n e n t Q
 erm
 Condition...identified on the zone change map by the symbol Q in
 at 5715 North Monterey Road; 58005814 North Monterey Road; and
 5321 East Via Marisol, subject to Conditions of Approval.


 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General
 Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action.


 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code
 Section 12.32 G:

 ...the Council may decide to impose a permanent Q
 Condition...identified on the zone change map by the symbol Q in
 brackets... There shall be no time limit on removal of the brackets
 around the [Q] Qualified designation nor on removal of the
 [T] Tentative designation. After the conditions of the permanent [Q]
 Qualified classification have been fulfilled, the brackets
 surrounding the Q symbol shall be removed.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.


 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee
 Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior
 to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination
 filing.


 Applicant: City of Los Angeles
 Case No. CPC­2021­8627­GPA­ZC
 Environmental No. ENV­2021­8629­ND


 Fiscal Impact Statement:
 The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as
 administrative costs are recovered through fees.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(7) 21­0245
 CD 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ADDENDUM, PLANNING
 AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Amendment to the
 West Adams­Baldwin Hills­Leimert Community Plan Implementation
 Overlay District.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 13
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(7) 21­0245
 CD 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ADDENDUM, PLANNING
 AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Amendment to the
 West Adams­Baldwin Hills­Leimert Community Plan Implementation
 Overlay District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 project was assessed in the previously certified EIR No. ENV­2008­
 478­EIR, certified on June 29, 2016; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164
 and the Addendum, dated August 2020, that no major revisions to
 the EIR are required and no subsequent EIR, or Negative
 Declaration is required for approval of the project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC), as set forth in the LACPC report dated
 March 1, 2021 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying revised ORDINANCE,
 dated May 31, 2022, amending the West Adams­Baldwin Hills­
 Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay District (Ordinance
 No. 184794, as subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 186401)
 to modify provisions in the Jefferson/La Cienega Transit Oriented
 District Subarea for Parcel Group E.


 4. NOT PRESENT and ORDER FILED the draft Ordinance, dated
 April 20, 2022, attached to the Council file, inasmuch as the revised
 draft Ordinance dated May 31, 2022 is hereby being considered for
 adoption.


 Applicant: David McNaught, 5850 West Jefferson, LLC
 Representative: Francis Park, Park and Velayos LLP
 Case No. CPC­2019­4992­CPIOA­ZAD­SPR­WDI
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2008­478­EIR; SCH No. 2008021013
 Related Case: ADM­2019­4994­CPIOC


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the
 Wednesday LACPC. - September
 Neither the City28, 2022 -
 Administrative Officer nor thePAGE
 Chief14
 Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
 Representative: Francis Park, Park and Velayos LLP
 Case No. CPC­2019­4992­CPIOA­ZAD­SPR­WDI
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2008­478­EIR; SCH No. 2008021013
 Related Case: ADM­2019­4994­CPIOC


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the
 LACPC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(8) 20­1127­S1
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an Agreement
 between the City and Grey Wall Software LLC Veoci to provide additional
 situational awareness dashboard development, user training and licensing
 for the City’s Emergency Operations Center.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to:


 a. Negotiate and execute a contract with Grey Wall Software LLC
 Veoci to provide additional situational awareness dashboard
 development, user training and licensing for a term of up to six
 months, within the grant performance period, in an amount not to
 exceed $146,735, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to
 form.


 b. Prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, subject
 to approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations within this report will have no additional impact to the
 General Fund and will provide for the continued expenditure of the Fiscal
 Year 2020 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program grant
 award for grant­related projects. No matching funds are required for this
 grant.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies
 in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities.


 Wednesday Community-Impact Statement:
 September None
 28, 2022 - submitted PAGE 15
 General Fund and will provide for the continued expenditure of the Fiscal
 Year 2020 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program grant
 award for grant­related projects. No matching funds are required for this
 grant.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies
 in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Ad Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood
 Investment waived consideration of the above matter)


(9) 21­1342
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of implementing an
 ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial Electric
 Vehicle(EV) charging companies directly to consumers.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ De
 Leon):


 1. INSTRUCT the Office of Finance, with the assistance of the City
 Attorney, to report in 30 days on the feasibility of implementing an
 ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial EV
 charging companies directly to a consumer, or by prepayments of
 electricity in the form of a subscription or service/membership plan
 with electric vehicle manufacturers/retailers, as a business activity
 that falls within the retail sales category of the Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), including, but not limited
 to, potential budget impact associated with the reclassification of
 the sale on non­distributed electricity by electric vehicle charging
 companies as retail transactions, pursuant to LAMC Section 21.44.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney to transmit a draft Ordinance in 30 days
 to codify the non­distributed sale of electricity by commercial electric
 vehicle charging companies as a retail transaction consistent with
 the retail sales category of the LAMC, including a December 31,
 2027 sunset clause.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 16
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council


 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)


(10) 21­0268
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to artificial intelligence (AI) technology and
 services to provide accurate reporting and public disclosure of the City’s
 organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ Bonin
 ­ Buscaino ­ Blumenfield):
 REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and
 INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the assistance of the
 Information Technology Agency, Bureau of Sanitation, Port of Los
 Angeles, Los Angeles World Airports and the City Administrative Officer
 (CAO), to report on the feasibility of developing and/or procuring AI
 technology and services to provide accurate and regular reporting and
 public disclosure of the City's organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint,
 as well as metrics on the City’s progress toward achieving and exceeding
 the environmental goals presented in the 2019 Green New Deal Pathway.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(11) 20­0620
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installed stationary natural gas and
 diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the
 feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz ­ Ryu):
 REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, with the
 assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), City Administrative
 Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, to report on the number of installed
 Wednesday stationary natural gas­ and
 - September  28,diesel­fueled
 2022 - distributed generation
 PAGE 17resources
 in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installed stationary natural gas and
 diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the
 feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz ­ Ryu):
 REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, with the
 assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), City Administrative
 Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, to report on the number of installed
 stationary natural gas­ and diesel­fueled distributed generation resources
 in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such
 resources.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(12) 22­0977
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to submitting a proposal
 to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to
 provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail operations
 across the Metro transit system, in response to Proposal No. PS45017.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department to submit a proposal to
 the Metro to provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail
 operations across the Metro transit system in response to Request for
 Proposal No. PS45017.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police
 Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


(13) 22­1014
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to eight proposed
 Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc., Absolute International
 Security, Allied Protection Services, Inc., Universal Protection Services
 (dba Allied Universal Security Services), Close Range International, Inc.,
 The Gadite Group, Inc., GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI
 International, Inc. for as­needed security guard services at various City
 municipal facilities and sites.

 Recommendations for Council action:
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 18
(13) 22­1014
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to eight proposed
 Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc., Absolute International
 Security, Allied Protection Services, Inc., Universal Protection Services
 (dba Allied Universal Security Services), Close Range International, Inc.,
 The Gadite Group, Inc., GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI
 International, Inc. for as­needed security guard services at various City
 municipal facilities and sites.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to
 execute the proposed eight Agreements with Abet Security
 Services, Inc.; Absolute International Security; Allied Protection
 Services, Inc.; Universal Protection Services (dba Allied Universal
 Security Services); Close Range International, Inc.; The Gadite
 Group, Inc.; GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI International,
 Inc., (collectively Contractors) for a three­year term, retroactively
 beginning on February 21, 2022, with two one­year renewal options,
 for as­needed security guard services at various City sites and
 facilities, subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form.


 2. INSTRUCT the LAPD, with assistance from the City Attorney, to
 revise Section 3 – Compensation and Method of Payment in future
 amendments and/or agreements to clarify that the maximum
 allowable compensation of $10 million is a Citywide aggregate
 ceiling for all Contractors providing security guard services, whereas
 the total shared expenditures shall not exceed $30 million over the
 three­year term.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that approval of the recommendations stated in this report will authorize
 the LAPD to enter into an agreement with eight security guard firms: 1.
 Abet Security Services, Inc.; 2. Absolute International Security; 3. Allied
 Protection Services, Inc.; 4. Universal Protection Services dba Allied
 Universal Security Services; 5. Close Range International, Inc.; 6. The
 Gadite Group, Inc.; 7. GSG Protective Services CA, Inc.; and, 8. RMI
 International, Inc., (collectively, Contractors). The term of each agreement
 is three­years beginning on February 21, 2022 and through February 20,
 2025, with two one­year renewal options. The maximum allowable
 compensation is an aggregate ceiling that shall not exceed $10,000,000
 annually, for a combined compensation of $30 million over three years.
 Funding is provided within the LAPD’s 003040 Contractual Services
 Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the
 Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in
 that one­time revenues will be used to support one­time expenditures.

 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 19
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 compensation is an aggregate ceiling that shall not exceed $10,000,000
 annually, for a combined compensation of $30 million over three years.
 Funding is provided within the LAPD’s 003040 Contractual Services
 Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the
 Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in
 that one­time revenues will be used to support one­time expenditures.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(14) 22­4118­S9
 CD 3 RESOLUTION (BLUMENFIELD – BUSCAINO) relative to designationg
 locations in Council District 3 for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or
 otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, as further detailed in Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate
 the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property,
 or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, up to the maximum
 distance and effective for the maximum period of time prescribed,
 and further detailed in the LAMC:

 a. Independence Avenue and Osborne Street – Public Safety


 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City department(s) with
 jurisdiction over the identified location to post appropriate notices of
 the above prohibitions at these locations, to begin enforcement
 upon the expiration of any required posting period.



(15) 18­0005­S27
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5082­012­008, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 20
 Recommendation for Council action:
 jurisdiction over the identified location to post appropriate notices of
 the above prohibitions at these locations, to begin enforcement
 upon the expiration of any required posting period.



(15) 18­0005­S27
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5082­012­008, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case
 No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(16) 22­0005­S151
 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard (Case No. 682471), Assessor
 I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard
 (Case No. 682471), Assessor I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(17) 22­0005­S152
 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D.
 No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 21
 Recommendation for Council action:
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(17) 22­0005­S152
 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D.
 No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case
 No. 448399), Assessor I.D. No. 2786­012­059, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(18) 22­0005­S153
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard (Case No. 738793), Assessor
 I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard
 (Case No. 738793), Assessor I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(19) 22­0005­S154
 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No.
 5040­006­020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 22
 Recommendation for Council action:
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(19) 22­0005­S154
 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No.
 5040­006­020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No.
 725696), Assessor I.D. No. 5040­006­020, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(20) 22­0005­S155
 CD 1 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No. 752500), Assessor I.D. No.
 5136­021­018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No.
 752500), Assessor I.D. No. 5136­021­018, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(21) 17­0957
 MOTION (KREKORIAN ­ LEE) relative to reactivating and restoring Council
 file No. (CF) 17­0957 regarding the Land Use Operating Standards /
 Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance.

 Wednesday - September
 Recommendation 28, 2022
 for Council -
 action: PAGE 23
 financial analysis of this report.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(21) 17­0957
 MOTION (KREKORIAN ­ LEE) relative to reactivating and restoring Council
 file No. (CF) 17­0957 regarding the Land Use Operating Standards /
 Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 REACTIVATE the matter of the “Land Use Operating Standards /
 Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance,” as recorded under
 CF 17­0957, which expired per Council policy (CF 05­0553); and,
 RESTORE to its most recent legislative status as of the date of the CF’s
 expiration.



(22) 22­1102
 CD 5 MOTION (KORETZ ­ KREKORIAN) relative to funding for tree and
 landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts in Council District
 5.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $100,000 in the Council District 5
 portion of the Neighborhood Service Enhancements line item in the
 General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the Street Services Fund
 No. 100/86, Account No. 3040 (Contractual Services) for tree and
 landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts along Pico
 Boulevard as part of the Walk Pico! A Catalyst for Community
 Vitality project, coordinated by the Bureau of Street Services (BSS).


 2. AUTHORIZE the BSS to prepare, process and execute the
 necessary documents with and / or payments to an appropriate
 vendor / contractor, or any other agency or organization, in the above
 amount for the above purpose, subject to the approval of the City
 Attorney as to form.


 3. AUTHORIZE the BSS to make any technical corrections or
 clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in
 order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.



(23) 22­1105
 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Tract No. 82324 located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street,
 westerly of Meyler Street.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 24
 3. AUTHORIZE the BSS to make any technical corrections or
 clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in
 order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.



(23) 22­1105
 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Tract No. 82324 located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street,
 westerly of Meyler Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82324, located at 921 Battery Street
 and 906 Channel Street, westerly of Meyler Street and accompanying
 Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security
 documents.
 (Bond No. C­141419)
 Subdivider: ACJJ Investments, LLC; Surveyor: Christopher W. Vassallo


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


(24) 22­1107
 CD 2 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Tract No. 82621 located at 6065 North Hazelhurst Place, northerly of
 Oxnard Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82621, located a 6065 North
 Hazelhurst Place, northerly of Oxnard Street and accompanying
 Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security
 documents.
 (Bond No. C­141420)
 Subdivider: OPP Zone LLC; Surveyor: Taik Y. Kim


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 25
(25) 22­0962
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (25) 22­0962
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL) relative to
 authorizing one Resolution Authority without funding for one Public
 Information Director II (Class Code 1800) for the Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS) from September 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE, within the BOS, one Resolution Authority without funding for
 one Public Information Director II (Class Code 1800) from September 1,
 2022 to June 30, 2023, subject to position allocation by the Personnel
 Department and paygrade determination by the City Administrative
 Officer.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)



Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Adjourning Motions


Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 26
Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
Council Adjournment


EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ­ If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 ­ If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00­0000).




 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 27

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Wednesday, September 28, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 ­ 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)
 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)
Roll Call
Members present: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris-Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
Raman, Rodriguez (10); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, De Leon, Lee, Price (5)
Approval of the Minutes
Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED


Multiple Agenda Item Comment


Public Testimony of Non­agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council


Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21­1277
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION
 relative to adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code (LAAC) to designate the director of the Climate
 Emergency Mobilization Office (CEMO) within the Department of Public
 Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. NOTE and FILE the July 29, 2022 Emergency Management
 Department report relative to opportunities to improve the network of
 cooling centers in the City.


 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the
 LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department
 of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 Wednesday completed a- September
 financial analysis of this
 28, 2022 - report. PAGE 1
 2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 19, 2022, adding Subsection (e) to Section 22.362 of the
 LAAC to designate the director of the CEMO within the Department
 of Public Works as the Chief Heat Officer for the City.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Echo Park Neighborhood Council


 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(2) 22­0840
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­010 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) which approves the Arizona
 Nuclear Power Project (ANPP) Hassayampa Switchyard Interconnection
 Agreement.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Interconnection
 Agreement is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
 15060(c)(3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not
 subject to CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project.
 Section 15378(b)(5) states that organizational or administrative
 activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in
 the environment do not meet that definition. Therefore, approving the
 Interconnection Agreement is not subject to CEQA.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­010, which approves the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement among the Co­Owners of the ANPP
 Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los
 Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No.
 BP 21­011.


 Wednesday - September
 3. PRESENT 28, 2022
 and ADOPT the- accompanying ORDINANCE,
 PAGE 2 dated
 July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 the environment do not meet that definition. Therefore, approving the
 Interconnection Agreement is not subject to CEQA.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­010, which approves the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement among the Co­Owners of the ANPP
 Hassayampa Switchyard and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC, Los
 Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) Agreement No.
 BP 21­011.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 July 21, 2022, approving the ANPP Hassayampa Switchyard
 Interconnection Agreement, LADWP No. BP 21­011, by and among
 Arizona Public Service Company, El Paso Electric Company, Public
 Service Company of New Mexico, Salt River Project Agricultural
 Improvement and Power District, Southern California Edison,
 Southern California Public Power Authority, the City, acting by and
 through the LADWP; and Sun Streams Expansion, LLC; and,
 delegating to the Board authority to amend the Agreement.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no new
 or additional fiscal impact to the Power Revenue Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed action
 complies with the LADWP's Financial Policies in that funding is available
 for this purpose.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(3) 14­0737­S1
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­009 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the South State
 Water Project (SWP) Hydropower Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 (FERC) Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Cost Sharing
 Wednesday Agreement itself, is28,
 - September exempt
 2022 pursuant
 - to CEQA Guidelines
 PAGE 315060(c)
 (3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not subject to
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the South State
 Water Project (SWP) Hydropower Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 (FERC) Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Cost Sharing
 Agreement itself, is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15060(c)
 (3). In accordance with this Section, an activity is not subject to
 CEQA if it does not meet the definition of a project. Section
 15378(b)(4) states that government fiscal activities which do not
 involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a
 potentially significant physical impact on the environment do not
 meet the definition of a "project" under the CEQA Guidelines.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of July 12, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­009, approving the SWP Hydropower FERC Project No. P­
 2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the City, acting by
 and through the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
 (LADWP), and the California Department of Water Resources as
 co­licensees of the South SWP Hydropower Project, LADWP
 Agreement No. BP 21­001.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated
 August 4, 2022, approving the South SWP Hydropower FERC
 Project No. P­2426 Cost Sharing Agreement by and between the
 City, acting by and through the LADWP, and the California
 Department of Water Resources as co­licensees of the South SWP
 Hydropower Project, LADWP Agreement No. BP 21­001; and,
 delegating to the Board limited authority to amend said Agreement.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that the proposed Cost Sharing Agreement will authorize on­going annual
 FERC license charges, and up to $43.13 million in additional new costs
 for implementation of the protection, mitigation, and enhancement
 (PM&E) measures identified. Approximately, $2,748,100 in funding is
 budgeted in the 2022­23 Power Revenue Fund Proposed Budget for the
 license charges and additional funding will be provided in subsequent
 budgets for the protection, mitigation, and enhancement measures.
 Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact
 on the City's General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 4
Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 license charges and additional funding will be provided in subsequent
 budgets for the protection, mitigation, and enhancement measures.
 Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have no impact
 on the City's General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(4) 22­0921
 EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL
 JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST
 CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 023­036 of the Board of
 Water and Power Commissioners (Board) approving the Haynes
 Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
 Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Haynes Unit 8 Retrofit
 Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)
 (2). In accordance with Section 15060(c)(2), an activity is not subject
 to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable
 indirect physical change in the environment. The approval of this
 Ordinance will authorize the use of the competitive sealed bid
 proposal method to let a contract, and will not result in any physical
 change in the environment; therefore, the proposed action is not
 subject to CEQA.


 2. CONCUR with the Board’s action of August 9, 2022, Resolution No.
 023­036, approving the Haynes Generating Station Unit 8 Recycled
 Water, Cooling System Retrofit Project.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 25, 2022, authorizing the Board to award an agreement
 pursuant to a competitive sealed proposal method, permitting
 negotiations relating to the engineering, procurement, and
 construction of a wet cooling system consisting of a cooling tower
 and associated infrastructure, integration of new cooling system with
 existing equipment, addition of a station service voltage transformer,
 demolition of once­through­cooling piping and associated
 equipment, modernization of the existing stormwater and
 wastewater systems, and hazardous material abatement and
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 5
 disposal as required, as part of the Haynes Generating Station Unit
 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 25, 2022, authorizing the Board to award an agreement
 pursuant to a competitive sealed proposal method, permitting
 negotiations relating to the engineering, procurement, and
 construction of a wet cooling system consisting of a cooling tower
 and associated infrastructure, integration of new cooling system with
 existing equipment, addition of a station service voltage transformer,
 demolition of once­through­cooling piping and associated
 equipment, modernization of the existing stormwater and
 wastewater systems, and hazardous material abatement and
 disposal as required, as part of the Haynes Generating Station Unit
 8 Recycled Water Cooling System Retrofit Project.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will not have a fiscal impact.
 However, the ensuing contract will result in a total expenditure estimated at
 $130 million. Funding will be provided from the Power Revenue Fund's
 Adopted Budget for this Project in subsequent years should it be
 approved. Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance will have
 no impact on the City’s General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed request
 complies with LADWP’s adopted Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(5) 20­1536
 ORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to amending the Los
 Angeles Municipal Code to clarify the definition of outdoor advertising
 structure, and to exempt certain approved structures from the prohibition of
 outdoor advertising structures in the public right­of­way.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council
 West Hills Neighborhood Council
 Mar Vista Community Council
 Westwood Neighborhood Council
 Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council
 Against:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council
 Wednesday - SeptemberCenter
 Woodland Hills­Warner  28, 2022 -
 Neighborhood Council PAGE 6
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 For:
 Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council
 West Hills Neighborhood Council
 Mar Vista Community Council
 Westwood Neighborhood Council
 Bel Air­Beverly Crest Neighborhood Council
 Against:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Hollywood United Neighborhood Council
 Boyle Heights Neighborhood Council
 Woodland Hills­Warner Center Neighborhood Council
 Sunland­Tujunga Neighborhood Council
 Coastal San Pedro Neighborhood Council
 For if Amended:
 West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council
 Del Rey Neighborhood Council
 Northwest San Pedro Neighborhood Council
 Sun Valley Area Neighborhood Council
 Neutral Position:
 Reseda Neighborhood Council


 (Public Works Committee report adopted at Council meeting of
 September 20, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman (9); Nays: Rodriguez (1); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr. (5)

(6) 20­1426
 CD 14 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION and ORDINANCE
 FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a General Plan Amendment (GPA),
 and Zone Change (ZC) for the properties located at 5715 North Monterey
 Road; 5800­5814 North Monterey Road; and 5321 East Via Marisol.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
 (CEQA) Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the
 administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV­
 2021­8629­ND, and all comments received, there is no substantial
 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
 environment; FIND the Negative Declaration reflects the
 independent judgment and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the
 Negative Declaration.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Wednesday - September
 Commission 28, 2022
 (LACPC) as the- Findings of Council. PAGE 7
 1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
 (CEQA) Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the
 administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV­
 2021­8629­ND, and all comments received, there is no substantial
 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
 environment; FIND the Negative Declaration reflects the
 independent judgment and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the
 Negative Declaration.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.


 3. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, as recommended by the
 Mayor and the LACPC, APPROVING a GPA to the Northeast Los
 Angeles Community Plan from Low Medium II Residential to
 Neighborhood Commercial for the subject properties.


 4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 May 26, 20222, to effectuate a ZC from RD1.5­1 to [Q}C4­1VL for
 the subject properties; the action is in response to Motion (de León
 – Price), Council file No. 20­1426, which requests that the General
 Plan Land Use and Zoning of these properties be corrected to
 reflect existing built conditions and to facilitate the reuse of existing
 commercial buildings in the Hermon neighborhood, the GPA and ZC
 does not involve the demolition, remodel, construction, or alteration
 of any structures, public facilities, or land; for the properties located
 at 5715 North Monterey Road; 58005814 North Monterey Road; and
 5321 East Via Marisol, subject to Conditions of Approval.


 5. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning to update the General
 Plan and appropriate maps pursuant to this action.


 6. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code
 Section 12.32 G:

 ...the Council may decide to impose a permanent Q
 Condition...identified on the zone change map by the symbol Q in
 brackets... There shall be no time limit on removal of the brackets
 around the [Q] Qualified designation nor on removal of the
 [T] Tentative designation. After the conditions of the permanent [Q]
 Qualified classification have been fulfilled, the brackets
 surrounding the Q symbol shall be removed.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.

Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 8
 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 [T] Tentative designation. After the conditions of the permanent [Q]
 Qualified classification have been fulfilled, the brackets
 surrounding the Q symbol shall be removed.


 7. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to California State Public
 Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require
 evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and
 maintained throughout the life of the project and the City may require
 any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.


 8. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code
 Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee
 Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior
 to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination
 filing.


 Applicant: City of Los Angeles
 Case No. CPC­2021­8627­GPA­ZC
 Environmental No. ENV­2021­8629­ND


 Fiscal Impact Statement:
 The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as
 administrative costs are recovered through fees.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(7) 21­0245
 CD 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), ADDENDUM, PLANNING
 AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Amendment to the
 West Adams­Baldwin Hills­Leimert Community Plan Implementation
 Overlay District.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 project was assessed in the previously certified EIR No. ENV­2008­
 478­EIR, certified on June 29, 2016; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164
 Wednesday and -theSeptember
 Addendum,28,  2022 -
 dated PAGE 9
 August 2020, that no major revisions to
 the EIR are required and no subsequent EIR, or Negative
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. FIND, based on the independent judgement of the decision­maker,
 after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the
 project was assessed in the previously certified EIR No. ENV­2008­
 478­EIR, certified on June 29, 2016; and pursuant to California
 Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164
 and the Addendum, dated August 2020, that no major revisions to
 the EIR are required and no subsequent EIR, or Negative
 Declaration is required for approval of the project.


 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning
 Commission (LACPC), as set forth in the LACPC report dated
 March 1, 2021 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council.


 3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying revised ORDINANCE,
 dated May 31, 2022, amending the West Adams­Baldwin Hills­
 Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay District (Ordinance
 No. 184794, as subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 186401)
 to modify provisions in the Jefferson/La Cienega Transit Oriented
 District Subarea for Parcel Group E.


 4. NOT PRESENT and ORDER FILED the draft Ordinance, dated
 April 20, 2022, attached to the Council file, inasmuch as the revised
 draft Ordinance dated May 31, 2022 is hereby being considered for
 adoption.


 Applicant: David McNaught, 5850 West Jefferson, LLC
 Representative: Francis Park, Park and Velayos LLP
 Case No. CPC­2019­4992­CPIOA­ZAD­SPR­WDI
 Environmental Nos. ENV­2008­478­EIR; SCH No. 2008021013
 Related Case: ADM­2019­4994­CPIOC


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney nor the
 LACPC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
(5)
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 10
 LACPC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative
 Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item; Ordinance held over to October 7, 2022
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(8) 20­1127­S1
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an Agreement
 between the City and Grey Wall Software LLC Veoci to provide additional
 situational awareness dashboard development, user training and licensing
 for the City’s Emergency Operations Center.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to:


 a. Negotiate and execute a contract with Grey Wall Software LLC
 Veoci to provide additional situational awareness dashboard
 development, user training and licensing for a term of up to six
 months, within the grant performance period, in an amount not to
 exceed $146,735, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to
 form.


 b. Prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, subject
 to approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations within this report will have no additional impact to the
 General Fund and will provide for the continued expenditure of the Fiscal
 Year 2020 Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program grant
 award for grant­related projects. No matching funds are required for this
 grant.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies
 in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Ad Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood
 Investment waived consideration of the above matter)
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 11
 Adopted Item
 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 provided in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies
 in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant­eligible activities.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Ad Hoc Committee on COVID­19 Recovery and Neighborhood
 Investment waived consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(9) 21­1342
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of implementing an
 ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial Electric
 Vehicle(EV) charging companies directly to consumers.

 Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ De
 Leon):


 1. INSTRUCT the Office of Finance, with the assistance of the City
 Attorney, to report in 30 days on the feasibility of implementing an
 ordinance that would codify the sale of electricity by commercial EV
 charging companies directly to a consumer, or by prepayments of
 electricity in the form of a subscription or service/membership plan
 with electric vehicle manufacturers/retailers, as a business activity
 that falls within the retail sales category of the Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), including, but not limited
 to, potential budget impact associated with the reclassification of
 the sale on non­distributed electricity by electric vehicle charging
 companies as retail transactions, pursuant to LAMC Section 21.44.


 2. REQUEST the City Attorney to transmit a draft Ordinance in 30 days
 to codify the non­distributed sale of electricity by commercial electric
 vehicle charging companies as a retail transaction consistent with
 the retail sales category of the LAMC, including a December 31,
 2027 sunset clause.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 12
 2027 sunset clause.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council


 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian,
 Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Cedillo, de León, Lee,
 Price Jr. (4)

(10) 21­0268
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to artificial intelligence (AI) technology and
 services to provide accurate reporting and public disclosure of the City’s
 organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint.

 Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz ­ Bonin
 ­ Buscaino ­ Blumenfield):
 REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and
 INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with the assistance of the
 Information Technology Agency, Bureau of Sanitation, Port of Los
 Angeles, Los Angeles World Airports and the City Administrative Officer
 (CAO), to report on the feasibility of developing and/or procuring AI
 technology and services to provide accurate and regular reporting and
 public disclosure of the City's organization­wide greenhouse gas footprint,
 as well as metrics on the City’s progress toward achieving and exceeding
 the environmental goals presented in the 2019 Green New Deal Pathway.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(11) 20­0620
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 13
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(11) 20­0620
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER
 COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installed stationary natural gas and
 diesel­fueled distributed generation resources in Los Angeles and the
 feasibility of limiting the addition of such resources.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz ­ Ryu):
 REQUEST the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, with the
 assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), City Administrative
 Officer (CAO), and the City Attorney, to report on the number of installed
 stationary natural gas­ and diesel­fueled distributed generation resources
 in Los Angeles and the feasibility of limiting the addition of such
 resources.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(12) 22­0977
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to submitting a proposal
 to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to
 provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail operations
 across the Metro transit system, in response to Proposal No. PS45017.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department to submit a proposal to
 the Metro to provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail
 operations across the Metro transit system in response to Request for
 Proposal No. PS45017.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police
 Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Wednesday - September
 Legislative Analyst 28, 2022 -a financial analysis ofPAGE
 has completed 14
 this report.
 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department to submit a proposal to
 the Metro to provide law enforcement services to support bus and rail
 operations across the Metro transit system in response to Request for
 Proposal No. PS45017.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police
 Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(13) 22­1014
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to eight proposed
 Agreements with Abet Security Services, Inc., Absolute International
 Security, Allied Protection Services, Inc., Universal Protection Services
 (dba Allied Universal Security Services), Close Range International, Inc.,
 The Gadite Group, Inc., GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI
 International, Inc. for as­needed security guard services at various City
 municipal facilities and sites.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to
 execute the proposed eight Agreements with Abet Security
 Services, Inc.; Absolute International Security; Allied Protection
 Services, Inc.; Universal Protection Services (dba Allied Universal
 Security Services); Close Range International, Inc.; The Gadite
 Group, Inc.; GSG Protective Services CA, Inc. and RMI International,
 Inc., (collectively Contractors) for a three­year term, retroactively
 beginning on February 21, 2022, with two one­year renewal options,
 for as­needed security guard services at various City sites and
 facilities, subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form.


 2. INSTRUCT the LAPD, with assistance from the City Attorney, to
 revise Section 3 – Compensation and Method of Payment in future
 amendments and/or agreements to clarify that the maximum
 allowable compensation of $10 million is a Citywide aggregate
 ceiling for all Contractors providing security guard services, whereas
 the total shared expenditures shall not exceed $30 million over the
 three­year term.


 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 15
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 2. INSTRUCT the LAPD, with assistance from the City Attorney, to
 revise Section 3 – Compensation and Method of Payment in future
 amendments and/or agreements to clarify that the maximum
 allowable compensation of $10 million is a Citywide aggregate
 ceiling for all Contractors providing security guard services, whereas
 the total shared expenditures shall not exceed $30 million over the
 three­year term.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that approval of the recommendations stated in this report will authorize
 the LAPD to enter into an agreement with eight security guard firms: 1.
 Abet Security Services, Inc.; 2. Absolute International Security; 3. Allied
 Protection Services, Inc.; 4. Universal Protection Services dba Allied
 Universal Security Services; 5. Close Range International, Inc.; 6. The
 Gadite Group, Inc.; 7. GSG Protective Services CA, Inc.; and, 8. RMI
 International, Inc., (collectively, Contractors). The term of each agreement
 is three­years beginning on February 21, 2022 and through February 20,
 2025, with two one­year renewal options. The maximum allowable
 compensation is an aggregate ceiling that shall not exceed $10,000,000
 annually, for a combined compensation of $30 million over three years.
 Funding is provided within the LAPD’s 003040 Contractual Services
 Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the
 Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations
 stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in
 that one­time revenues will be used to support one­time expenditures.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022


 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION ­ OCTOBER 28, 2022)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(14) 22­4118­S9
 CD 3 RESOLUTION (BLUMENFIELD – BUSCAINO) relative to designationg
 locations in Council District 3 for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or
 otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, as further detailed in Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 16
 (5)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held ­ (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(14) 22­4118­S9
 CD 3 RESOLUTION (BLUMENFIELD – BUSCAINO) relative to designationg
 locations in Council District 3 for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property, or
 otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, as further detailed in Los
 Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 41.18.

 Recommendations for Council action:


 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Section 41.18 of the LAMC, to designate
 the following locations for enforcement against sitting, lying,
 sleeping, or storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property,
 or otherwise obstructing the public right­of­way, up to the maximum
 distance and effective for the maximum period of time prescribed,
 and further detailed in the LAMC:

 a. Independence Avenue and Osborne Street – Public Safety


 2. RESOLVE to direct and authorize the City department(s) with
 jurisdiction over the identified location to post appropriate notices of
 the above prohibitions at these locations, to begin enforcement
 upon the expiration of any required posting period.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Buscaino, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Rodriguez (9); Nays: Bonin, Raman (2); Absent: Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price
 Jr. (4)

(15) 18­0005­S27
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case No. 718747), Assessor I.D.
 No. 5082­012­008, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case
 No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 17
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 4442 West Pico Boulevard (Case
 No. 718747), Assessor I.D. No. 5082­012­008, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(16) 22­0005­S151
 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard (Case No. 682471), Assessor
 I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 11512 South Avalon Boulevard
 (Case No. 682471), Assessor I.D. No. 6072­006­004, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(17) 22­0005­S152
 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D.
 No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 Wednesday APPROVE- the
 September 28, 2022
 LAHD report -
 recommendation PAGE
 dated 18
 September 19,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(17) 22­0005­S152
 CD 12 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case No. 448399), Assessor I.D.
 No. 2786­012­059, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 8443 North Lindley Avenue (Case
 No. 448399), Assessor I.D. No. 2786­012­059, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(18) 22­0005­S153
 CD 10 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard (Case No. 738793), Assessor
 I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 4212 South Degnan Boulevard
 (Case No. 738793), Assessor I.D. No. 5024­024­011, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 Wednesday
 (5) - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 19
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(19) 22­0005­S154
 CD 8 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No. 725696), Assessor I.D. No.
 5040­006­020, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1309 West 36th Street (Case No.
 725696), Assessor I.D. No. 5040­006­020, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(20) 22­0005­S155
 CD 1 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING
 DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the
 property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No. 752500), Assessor I.D. No.
 5136­021­018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No.
 752500), Assessor I.D. No. 5136­021­018, from the REAP.


 Wednesday - September
 Fiscal Impact Statement:28,  2022
 None -
 submitted  by the LAHD.PAGE 20 the City
 Neither
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No. 752500), Assessor I.D. No.
 5136­021­018, from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated September 19,
 2022, attached to the Council file, and ADOPT the accompanying
 RESOLUTION removing the property at 1830 West 11th Place (Case No.
 752500), Assessor I.D. No. 5136­021­018, from the REAP.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a
 financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(21) 17­0957
 MOTION (KREKORIAN ­ LEE) relative to reactivating and restoring Council
 file No. (CF) 17­0957 regarding the Land Use Operating Standards /
 Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 REACTIVATE the matter of the “Land Use Operating Standards /
 Grandfathered Alcohol Establishments / Ordinance,” as recorded under
 CF 17­0957, which expired per Council policy (CF 05­0553); and,
 RESTORE to its most recent legislative status as of the date of the CF’s
 expiration.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(22) 22­1102
 CD 5 MOTION (KORETZ ­ KREKORIAN) relative to funding for tree and
 landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts in Council District
 5.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $100,000 in the Council District 5
 portion of the Neighborhood Service Enhancements line item in the
 Wednesday - City
 GeneralSeptember 28, 2022
 Purposes Fund -No. 100/56 to the Street
 PAGE 21
 Services Fund
 No. 100/86, Account No. 3040 (Contractual Services) for tree and
 CD 5 MOTION (KORETZ ­ KREKORIAN) relative to funding for tree and
 landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts in Council District
 5.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:


 1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $100,000 in the Council District 5
 portion of the Neighborhood Service Enhancements line item in the
 General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the Street Services Fund
 No. 100/86, Account No. 3040 (Contractual Services) for tree and
 landscape maintenance and climate sustainability efforts along Pico
 Boulevard as part of the Walk Pico! A Catalyst for Community
 Vitality project, coordinated by the Bureau of Street Services (BSS).


 2. AUTHORIZE the BSS to prepare, process and execute the
 necessary documents with and / or payments to an appropriate
 vendor / contractor, or any other agency or organization, in the above
 amount for the above purpose, subject to the approval of the City
 Attorney as to form.


 3. AUTHORIZE the BSS to make any technical corrections or
 clarifications as necessary to the above fund transfer instructions in
 order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.


 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(23) 22­1105
 CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Tract No. 82324 located at 921 Battery Street and 906 Channel Street,
 westerly of Meyler Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82324, located at 921 Battery Street
 and 906 Channel Street, westerly of Meyler Street and accompanying
 Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security
 documents.
 (Bond No. C­141419)
 Subdivider: ACJJ Investments, LLC; Surveyor: Christopher W. Vassallo


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 22
 documents.
 (Bond No. C­141419)
 Subdivider: ACJJ Investments, LLC; Surveyor: Christopher W. Vassallo


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(24) 22­1107
 CD 2 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map
 of Tract No. 82621 located at 6065 North Hazelhurst Place, northerly of
 Oxnard Street.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 82621, located a 6065 North
 Hazelhurst Place, northerly of Oxnard Street and accompanying
 Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security
 documents.
 (Bond No. C­141420)
 Subdivider: OPP Zone LLC; Surveyor: Taik Y. Kim



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider
 has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant
 to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional
 City funds are needed.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(25) 22­0962
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL) relative to
 authorizing one Resolution Authority without funding for one Public
 Information Director II (Class Code 1800) for the Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS) from September 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 23
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)

(25) 22­0962
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL) relative to
 authorizing one Resolution Authority without funding for one Public
 Information Director II (Class Code 1800) for the Bureau of Sanitation
 (BOS) from September 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE, within the BOS, one Resolution Authority without funding for
 one Public Information Director II (Class Code 1800) from September 1,
 2022 to June 30, 2023, subject to position allocation by the Personnel
 Department and paygrade determination by the City Administrative
 Officer.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr.
 (5)



Items Called Special


Motions for Posting and Referral - SEE ATTACHED


Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings


Adjourning Motions - SEE ATTACHED


Council Adjournment



ENDING ROLL CALL
Blumenfield, Bonin, Buscaino, Harris­Dawson, Hutt, Koretz, Krekorian, Martinez, O'Farrell, Raman,
Rodriguez (11); Absent: Cedillo, de León, Lee, Price Jr. (4)



Whereupon the Council did adjourn.
 Wednesday - September 28, 2022 - PAGE 24
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
O’Farrell for Lee Krekorian Chaminade College
 Preparatory 70th
 Anniversary
De Leon Martinez Bad Bunny Day
Rodriguez Raman Susana Carmona
O’Farrell Krekorian “Mama” Cass Elliot
Buscaino Bonin Zucchero “Sugar” Fornaciari
 Day
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Raman All Members Candy Ann Williams
Rodriguez All Members Anita Casillas Hernandez
Rodriguez All Members Hector Cordova Mireles
 A recent report by the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) states that sixty-three percent of Los
Angeles residents are renters, comprising 874,365 households. LAHD further reports that fifty-six percent of
Los Angeles residential households are rent burdened, paying more than thirty percent of their income for rent,
and another twenty-six percent are severely rent burdened, paying more than fifty percent of household income
for rent. In addition to enduring some of the worst affordability challenges in the nation, Los Angeles residential
households faced increased financial hardships during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 Council District 13 has over 101,000 multi-family rental units, the highest number in any Council
District, as well as the highest number of rent stabilized units. According to LAHD, the district also had the
highest number of applications for emergency rental assistance. LAHD paid $321 million on behalf of City
renters under the locally administered Emergency Rental Assistance Programs, with over 57 ,000 approved
applications. High vulnerability areas will require additional support as emergency tenant protections come to an
end, including Historic Filipinotown, Westlake, East Hollywood, Wilshire Center, Little Armenia, and Melrose.

 From the beginning of the pandemic, Council District 13 Rental assistance program was established and
with $1 million from AB 1290 Funds were provided to help 500 CD13 households stay in their homes. To
address the continued need for financial assistance, Council District 13, in partnership with LAHD, will initiate
a rental aid program for district residents. The Council District AB 1290 Fund provides funding for
redevelopment and community services. Sufficient funds are available in the Council District 13 portion of the
AB 1290 Fund for this purpose.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that $3 million in the AB 1290 Fund No. 53P, Account No. 281213 (CD 13
Redevelopment Projects - Services) be transferred/appropriated to the Housing Fund No. 100/43, Account No.
3040 (Contractual Services), for services to support the rental aid program for eligible renters in Council District
13.

 I FURTHER MOVE that Los Angeles Housing Department be authorized, with the assistance of the City
Administrative Officer, to make any corrections, clarifications or revisions, including any corrections and
changes to fund or account numbers to effectuate the intent of this Motion; said corrections/clarifications may be
made orally, electronically or by any other means.
 M OTI

 I MOVE that $400 from the Council's portion of the Heritage Month Celebrations &
Special Events line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100-56 be transferred I
appropriated to the General Services Fund No. 100-40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed)
for the Council District 6 special recognition of #Purple Thursday, the national day of action for
Domestic Violence Awareness, at City Hall on Thursday, October 20, 2022, including the
illumination of City Hall.




PRESENTED BY:

 Councilwoman, 6th District 0

SECONDED BY:




 SEP :-:. 8 =~~
 ' TO CITY CLERK FOR PLACEMENJ ON NEXT #53 ~I
 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTED




 MOTION
 I MOVE that the City Administrative Officer be authorized to prepare, process and
execute any documents necessary to extend through June 30, 2023 the term of City Contract
No. C-134581 with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc., for services associated with a study
and assessment of the potential economic impact of the potential redevelopment of surface
parking lots in the vicinity of Reseda Boulevard and Sherman Way in Council District 3 (CF
12-1549).




ak
 #,~54.
 . :



 M ()TI()~



 I MOVE that $400 be transferred I appropriated from the Council's portion of
the Heritage Month Celebrations & Special Events line item in the General City
Purposes Fund No. 100-56 to the General Services Fund No.100-40, Account No. 1070
(Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 7 special
observation of Fallen Firefighters on October 8, 2022, at City Hall, including the
illumination of City Hall.




 PRESENTE




 SECONDEDB




ak




 6EP 2
 TO CITY CLERK FoR-;;:;,=:::--=----.,..__ _,._,
 M ·.--.iann COUNC .A~LP;CEMENT ON NEXT ~
 IL RUEtvDA TO BE POSTED #55 ,:
 At its meeting on September 7, 2022 (Letter of Determination date: Septem er _, West Los
 Angeles Area Planning Commission (WLAAPC) denied an appeal relative to various building permits issued for
 the construction of a new four-story, single-family dwelling with attached garage, storage, recreation room,
 accessory dwelling unit, retaining and planter walls, deck, water fountain, pool and spa, for the property located at
 824 N. Kenter Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90049 (Case No. DIR-2021-8570-BSA-lA). The denial sustained the
 Planning Director's Determination that the Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) did not err or abuse its
 discretion by issuing the building permits.

 Action is needed to assert jurisdiction over the above described Commission action, to conduct further
 review, inasmuch as the proposed project could be defined as a "flag lot" that is located in a Hillside Area, Special
 Grading Area, and the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and is subject to the Baseline Hillside
 Ordinance (BHO). Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.03 defines a flag lot as "a lot so shaped and
 designed that the main building site area is set back from the street on which it fronts and includes an access strip
 not less than 20 feet in width at any point connecting the main building site area to the frontage street." Although
 the Director of Planning refers to the subject property as an "irregularly-shaped" lot, the plain language of the
 LAMC should be interpreted to apply in this instance. Pursuant to LAMC Sec. 12.22 C.22, projects that are
 situated in areas designated as Hillside or within the VHFHSZ may use an alternate methodology to calculate the
 width of the lot in lieu of LAMC Sec. 12.03. This debate on whether the subject property is a "flag lot" may have
 consequential impacts on the proposed project's residential floor area and calls into question the determination of
 the WLAAPC.

 The purpose and intent of the City's BHO is to promote the objectives, policies, and goals of our City's
 General Plan and Comtri:vnity Plans, such as the Brentwood Community Plan, to combat out-of-scale
 ,,, '
 \


 development and limit ·impa~ts related to grading, aesthetics, and the natural landscape and vegetation. In
 particular, the Brentwood Community Plan calls for development to be integrated with and be visually
 subordinate to natural features and terrain and to "strictly interpret and implement" the BHO. The proposed
 project attempts to take advantage of the "Cumulative Side Yard Setbacks Option" for a Residential Floor Area
 (RFA) bonus<'~~tlined in the BHO, yet fails to meet the intent of the ordinance to incentivize better design,
• . minjni~~·:· · ~ n~~~.1~graphy, and further reduce grading. Where there are unusual Building and/or Lot
 --- '-"c~ligur1tf ns, ht~~ n of Building and Safety can refer to the Director of Planning to clarify compliance
 with the ordinance if the project qualifies for an RFA bonus. In this instance, the proposed project does not meet
 the ordinance's intent to avoid the degrading effects of out-of-scale development and the Director of Planning
 should exercise its discretion to "strictly interpret and implement" the BHO.

 Moreover, based on the administrative record, higher scrutiny must be paid to all aspects of this proposed
 project as previous site activity has been called into question by the community as early as 2000. In 2007, the
 project received an Order to Comply due to unpermitted removal of vegetation, grading, excavation of vertical
 cuts up to 10 feet in height, and creation of an exploratory road with loose soil. Consequently, the site was issued
 a "Certificate of Substandard Property" on October 23, 2007 due to "unsupported vertical cuts, potential mud flow
 and non permitted grading." The most recent incident being a potential violation of the City's haul route
 ments in 2021, which prompted the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) to require
 ilding permit with revised grading and export calculations.

 iv n the unique challenges and consequences of building in hillside areas within the VHFHSZ and
 ---.u:·ntial impacts to the community, the findings in the Letter of Determination issued by the WLAAPC must
more clearly address how this proposed project complies with the LAMC and the intent of the BHO to minimize
its environmental and physical impacts. Therefore, the City Council must assert jurisdiction over this matter to
ensure that community concerns are thoroughly addressed.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that, pursuant to Section 245 of the Los Angeles City Charter, the City Council
assert jurisdiction over the September 7, 2022 (Letter of Determination date: September 23, 2022) West Los
Angeles Area Planning Commission action to deny the appeal and sustain the Director's Determination which
denied an appeal to the Director of Planning alleging that the Department of Building and Safety erred and abused
its discretion when issuing building permits in the matter of Case Number DIR-2021-8570-BSA-lA for the
project located at 824 North Kenter Avenue.

 I FURTHER MOVE that, upon assertion of jurisdiction, the City Council VETO the above described
action of the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission and REMAND the matter to this Commission for
reconsideration.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Council instruct the Department of Building and Safety, in
consultation with Los Angeles City Planning and any other relevant departments, to prepare a report within 21
days that thoroughly reviews of the applicability of Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 12.22 C.22 to
the subject property, provides an alternate calculation of lot width pursuant to the methodology outlined in LAMC
Sec. 12.22 C.22, and outlines how this alternate calculation for lot width may impact the proposed project in
relation to the allowable residential floor area bonus (LAMC Sec. 12.21 C.10(b)(3)), particularly via the
cumulative side yard setbacks option (LAMC Sec. 12.21 C.10(b)(3)(iii)), and any other relevant sections of the
Los Angeles Municipal Code should it be applied.


 PRESENTED BY:




 SECONDED BY:




 ,._
 ••
 .
 HOUSING
 MOTION


11010 SMB LP (Sponsor), a California limited partnership, and the Los Angeles Housing
Department (LAHD) need to update the affordability restrictions at the 11010 Santa
Monica Boulevard Project (Project; Council File Number 17-0090, 09-0420-Sl, and 20-
121) located at 11010 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025 in Council
District 5. The Project will provide 50 units of affordable housing and one manager unit.
The affordability restrictions as specified in the DDA Transmittal relative to requesting
approval to execute a Disposition and Development Agreement for the development of
supportive housing on City-owned property at 11010 Santa Monica Boulevard (Council
File Number 09-0420-Sl) dated May 14, 2020, are as follows:
 #of
 Unit Type Income Limit Voucher Type TOTAL
 Bedrooms
 25 Studio 30%AMI PBV 25
 25 Studio 50%AMI VASH 25
 1 2BR UNRESTRICTED NA 1
 TOTAL 51
The affordability restrictions as specified in the CFP Transmittal relative to the
Proposition HHH Permanent Supportive Housing Loan Program Funding
Recommendations 2018-19 Round 3 Call For Projects (Council File Number 17-0090-
S8) dated September 9, 2019 are as follows:
 #of
 Unit Type Income Limit TOTAL
 Bedrooms
 50 Studio 30% AMI or lower 50
 1 2BR UNRESTRICTED 1
 TOTAL 51
The affordability restrictions as specified in the PEP Transmittal relative to approving the
Proposition HHH Permanent Supportive Housing Project Expenditure Plan (Prop HHH
PEP) Fiscal Year 2020-2021 (Council File Number 17-0090-S 15) dated June 2, 2020 are
as follows:
 #of
 Unit Type Income Limit TOTAL
 Bedrooms
 50 Studio 30% AMI or lower 50
 1 2BR UNRESTRICTED 1
 TOTAL 51
The affordability restrictions as specified in the Bond Transmittal relative to a Los
Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department request for authority to issue


 SEP! 8-2
tax-exempt and taxable multifamily conduit revenue bonds for 11010 Santa Monica
Boulevard (Council File Number 20-1211) dated March 23, 2021, are as follows:
 #of
 Unit Type Income Limit TOTAL
 Bedrooms
 50 Studio 50% AMI or lower 50
 1 2BR UNRESTRICTED 1
 TOTAL 51

The proposed affordability restrictions are as follows:
  #of Unit Income Limit Voucher Chronic Other Age TOTAL
Bedrooms Type T :tpe Homeless Homeless
 25 Studi 30%AMI PBV 25 0 55+ 25
 0
 25 Stu di 50%AMI VASH 0 25 55+ 25
 0
 UNRESTRICTE NA NA NA NA 1
 1 2BR D
 TOTAL 25 25 51

Proposed rent restriction changes are being requested at the urging of the Veterans'
Administration (VA) of Greater Los Angeles. The VA has indicated that leasing up
VASH units targeting extremely low incomes is a significant challenge since Veterans
experiencing homelessness who are eligible for VA benefits now have higher incomes.
Additionally, all lenders and funders, including LAHD, HACLA, and HCD, support
correcting the senior restriction from 62 and up to 55 and up.

I THEREFORE MOVE, that the City Council consider the above information and
approve the updated rent restrictions on the 25 V ASH units at the Project to change the
AMI restriction for the 25 VASH units from 30% to 50%, to change the age restrictions
from 62 and older to 55 and older, and authorize the General Manager ofLAHD, or
designee, to amend the HHH Loan Docux


 PRESENTED BY: ~
 ~~~~~~~~----j~~~~~~~




 PAULKORETZ
 Councilmember, 51h District



 0
 a:
 C>
 PLANNING &LAND USE MANAGEMENT
 MOTION

Van Nuys Airport is one of the busiest general aviation airports in the United States. It houses
news helicopters, medical transport, and is a critical base of operations for several City
Departments including LAPD, LAFD,, and LADWP. The airport generates over $2 billion in
economic impact for the San Fernando Valley and supports over 10,000 jobs. Yet, with any facility
of this size, there are impacts on the community immediately surrounding the airport. This
includes noise, air pollution, and soot and exhaust being blown into nearby homes.

While much of the airport operations is controlled by the Federal Aviation Commission, the City
of Los Angeles does have some tools at its disposal in terms of land use. The Van Nuys Airport
Plan establishes land use zones for the airport and the land surrounding it. However, this plan
was adopted in 2006 and will soon be out of date. A new specific plan is needed for Van Nuys
Airport to plan for its future and mitigate impacts to the surrounding community.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the Department of City Planning in consultation with Los Angeles
World Airports (LAWA) create a Specific Plan for Van Nuys Airport to replace the Van Nuys Airport
Plan and zoning ordinance 177.327. This plan should:
 • Look at mitigating noise and other impacts from the airport on the surrounding area;
 including a barrier between the airport and nearby homes, additional hangar space, tree
 planting, and setbacks;
 • Establish a community benefit program for the surrounding area;
 • Explore how land covered by the plan can continue to be an economic generator by luring
 new commercial activity.
 • Have extensive engagement with airport stakeholders and local residents;

I FURTHER MOVE for LAWA and the City Attorney to report back on what the city can and cannot
do in terms of regulating activity at Van Nuys Airport.
 RESOL t~'r"'1AJLAR COU lCILAGENOA TO BE POSTED

 RULES, ELECTIONS &INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
WHEREAS, since 1983, the Islamic Republic of Iran has forced all women and children, regardless of
nationality or faith, to wear a headscarf and conceal their hair in public; and

WHEREAS, the Islamic Republic of Iran deploys its morality police to enforce compulsory dress codes and
routinely dehumanizes, harasses, and assaults women accused of not properly wearing a headscarf; and

WHEREAS, women accused of violating the national dress codes are arrested, forcibly taken to "re-education
centers," fined,·and whipped- even tortured and killed; and

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2022, a 22-year-old Kurdish Iranian woman named Jina Mahsa Amini was
arrested by the morality police and was later pronounced dead; and

WHEREAS, hours after Amini's death, thousands of courageous Iranian women gathered in protest throughout
Iran - chanting the Kurdish slogan "Women! Life! Freedom!" and calling for an end to the repression of Iranian
women, the abolition of compulsory dress codes, and justice for Amini and her family; and

WHEREAS, the Islamic Republic of Iran has imposed strict internet censorship and is using live ammunition
and plastic bullets in a brutal crackdown on the protests - killing as many as 76 protesters, injuring over 700
protesters, and imprisoning over 1,000 protesters, including women and children; and

WHEREAS, Iranian women have been at the forefront of social justice movements since the creation of the
Islamic Republic of Iran and continue to risk their lives today fighting for their freedom and human rights; and

WHEREAS, the City of Los Angeles is home to the largest Iranian community outside of Iran and Angelenos
have organized events throughout the City in support of Iranian protesters;

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the adoption of this
Resolution, the City of Los Angeles stands in solidarity with the women-led human rights movement in Iran and
commends them for their bravery and courage in demanding their rights and freedom; and .. f ,,
 -.
 ~-·
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Los Angeles joins the international community in condemni:irn
the Islamic Republic of Iran for the killing of Jina Mahsa Amini and the violence unleashed on peaceful Iranian
protesters demanding justice and accountability for Amini's death. ~- <t·




PRESENTED BY:\'.)~
 NITHYA MAN
 SECONDED BY: ~
 Councilmember, 4th istrict



 SEP 2 8 202
 MOTION TRADE, TRAVELAND TOURISM
Since the pandemic, general aviation airports have seen a surge in charter flights as individuals
have been willing to pay a premium to reserve a single seat aboard a chartered flight instead of
flying a commercial airline. This relatively new business model, known as charter by the seat,
has increased significantly at airports across the nation, including Van Nuys Airport. This trend
has been supported by technological advances, such as smart phone applications, that can post
schedules of charter flights and match passengers with available aircraft. As a result,
passengers can access various websites to book individual seats on flights to various
destinations. This practice, while approved under the Part 380 regulations of the U.S.
Department of Transportation, has raised concerns regarding increased operations and
associated impacts to the surrounding community.




 HP 2 8
 TRANSPORTATION
 MOTION

 Victory Boulevard is a typical example of a wide San Fernando Valley arterial that lends itself to
 excess speeding. This corridor is also on the Department of Transportation's High-Injury Network
 as part of the Vision Zero Program. Over the past 18 months, multiple cars traveling at incredibly
 high speeds have crashed along the segment between the 405 Freeway and Sepulveda
 Boulevard, damaging personal and city property and nearly injuring bystanders. Improvements
 need to be made on this stretch to protect residents from crashes and reduce speeding.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Department of Transportation and Bureau of Engineering create
 a plan within the next 30 days for safety improvements along Victory Boulevard between the 405
 Freeway and Sepulveda Boulevard in consultation with the surrounding community. This should
 include:

 • Speed reduction improvements such as speed tables.
 • A barrier at Blucher Street to prevent cars from crashing into homes.
 • Pedestrian Safety enhancements.




SEP 2 8 2022
 TRANSPORTATION
 MOTION

Buses are the backbone of Los Angeles' public transit system, comprising two-thirds of the total ridership
on the Metro system. This service is primarily used by very low-income people, with almost 70% of Metro's
riders making around $19,000 a year. Many of these riders live in Los Angeles with 105 out of a total of 119
Metro bus lines (88%) operating within the city. While not directly responsible for bus service, the city of
Los Angeles should do everything it can to ensure that our infrastructure supports the system and offers a
comfortable and fast ride.

Metro has made commitments to improve the bus system, including identifying corridors for quick-build bus
rapid transit (BRT). The agency will also begin work soon on several larger projects within the City of Los
Angeles, including improvements to the Orange Line, the North Valley BRT, and the North Hollywood to
Pasadena Transit Corridor. Metro collaborates with the Department of Transportation on a Bus Speed
Improvement Working Group and has built a number of projects and is planning future projects along
Sepulveda Boulevard, La Brea, and other corridors. Through the STAP program the city will build bus
shelters and other street furniture across the city.

Enhancing the bus system is a very tangible way to improve the lives of low-income Angelenos. Cities
across the world have transformed their transportation networks through relatively low cost improvements
to their bus systems such as the MetrobUs in Mexico City and the TransMileno in Bogota. Through the Rose
Lane program, the City of Portland has created a toolbox of 20 infrastructure improvements to make the
buses of the regional transportation provider faster and more reliable. By making investments to create a
world class bus system, the city can improve air quality, meet our climate goals, and improve mobility for
transit dependent Angelenos.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the Department of Transportation in collaboration with Metro report back with a
plan and strategies to build at least 100 miles of new bus-only lanes within the next five years that focuses
on the highest ridership corridors and most transit dependent communities.

I FURTHER MOVE that Department of Transportation, Bureau of Street Services, Bureau of Engineering,
and Bureau of Street Lighting in collaboration with Metro report back on strategies for improving the areas
around stations and investing in upgrades to the bus network, including:
 • Bus bulbs
 • Full lane markings
 • Mobility Hubs
 • Signal improvements
 •  First last mile improvements

I FURTHER MOVE that Bureau of Street Services and the Department of Transportation create an annual
plan for the next five years of the STAP program, how it can be prioritized along with these bus
improvements and in the most high ridership areas, as well as a budget.

I FURTHER MOVE that DOT in partnership with Metro create a branding and promotion strategy for these
new, enhanced bus facilities. ...,




 PRESENTED




 SECONDED ~~
 BY.~.> ,,~




  SEP 2 8 2022