Transportation Committee — Fayetteville, AR
Date: 2026-04-28
Time: 18:00

113 W Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701

 Transportation Committee Agenda
 (Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session)
 City Hall Room 101 / Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
 Tuesday, April 28, 2026
 6:00 PM


 Members
 Council Member Sarah Moore, Chair
 Council Member Robert "Bob" Stafford
 Council Member Sarah Bunch
 Council Member Min. Monique Jones

 City Staff
 Public Works Director Chris Brown
Assistant Public Works / Transportation Services Director Terry Gulley
 City Engineer Justin Bland
Transportation Committee April 28, 2026




Zoom Information

 Webinar ID: 880 8836 6450
 Registration Link: Zoom Link

A. Call to Order

B. Roll Call

C. New Business

 C.1. Safe Routes to School Plan

 Staff recommends forwarding the final draft of the Fayetteville Safe Routes to
 School plan to the full City Council.


 C.2. Vision Zero Safety Action Plan

 Staff recommends forwarding the Fayetteville Vision Zero Safety Action Plan to
 the full City Council.


 C.3. Memorandum of Agreement for Maintenance of Streets and Sidewalks
 on University of Arkansas Campus and Properties

D. Reports and Presentations

 D.1. Presentation from Peter Nierengarten-Changes to ORT and Razorback
 Transit Service in 2026

E. Informational Items

F. Adjournment




City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 2

113 W Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701

 Transportation Committee Agenda
 (Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session)
 City Hall Room 101 / Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
 Tuesday, April 28, 2026
 6:00 PM


 Members
 Council Member Sarah Moore, Chair
 Council Member Robert "Bob" Stafford
 Council Member Sarah Bunch
 Council Member Min. Monique Jones

 City Staff
 Public Works Director Chris Brown
Assistant Public Works / Transportation Services Director Terry Gulley
 City Engineer Justin Bland
Transportation Committee April 28, 2026




Zoom Information

 Webinar ID: 880 8836 6450
 Registration Link: Zoom Link

A. Call to Order

B. Roll Call

C. New Business

 C.1. Safe Routes to School Plan

 Staff recommends forwarding the final draft of the Fayetteville Safe Routes to
 School plan to the full City Council.


 C.2. Vision Zero Safety Action Plan

 Staff recommends forwarding the Fayetteville Vision Zero Safety Action Plan to
 the full City Council.


 C.3. Memorandum of Agreement for Maintenance of Streets and Sidewalks
 on University of Arkansas Campus and Properties

D. Reports and Presentations

 D.1. Presentation from Peter Nierengarten-Changes to ORT and Razorback
 Transit Service in 2026

E. Informational Items

F. Adjournment




City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 2
 Transportation Committee Memo
 2026-1521

Meeting of April 28, 2026
To: Transportation Committee
Thru: Matt Mihalevich, Active Transportation Manager
 Justin Bland, City Engineer
 Chris Brown, Public Works Director
From: Dane Eifling, Mobility Coordinator
Subject: Safe Routes to School Plan Review

Recommendation:
Staff recommends forwarding the final draft of the Fayetteville Safe Routes to School plan to the full City
Council.
Background:
In 2024 the City of Fayetteville was awarded a $100,000 grant by Northwest Arkansas Planning Commission
through Arkansas Department of Transportation’s Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) for a comprehensive Safe
Routes to School Plan for the City and the School district. The Fayetteville Public School District and the City
of Fayetteville each committed to $12,500 in matching funds for a total project budget of $125,000. Toole
Design Group was selected to create the plan through a competitive selection process. The final draft of the
plan was completed in April of 2026.
Discussion:
Fayetteville’s Public Schools are a primary driver of traffic congestion in Fayetteville with more than 10,000
students traveling to and from school each day. Despite Fayetteville status as a Gold level Bicycle Friendly
Community, extensive trail system and traffic safety efforts less than ten percent of public-school students walk
or bike to school.

This plan focuses on six key areas Engineering, Education, Encouragement, Equity, Enforcement and
Evaluation & Planning known as the “Six E’s” to bring a holistic approach to address infrastructure needs
around campuses as well as policy changes and support programs to foster a culture that normalizes and
celebrates families’ choice to safely walk bike or roll to school every day.


Key goals of this plan are:
Engineering and Planning:
Address all infrastructure gaps within a 1/4-mile of every school and identify safe routes to each school.

Education:
Provide on-the-bike education to students K-6; Provide driver education for are givers at every school and
driving students at high school.

Encouragement:
Provide walk/bike programming at all schools to help achieve the Plan's school-specific mode share goal,

Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
increasing the number of students who walk, bike and roll to school by 50% by 2029.

Enforcement:
Ensure every school has full crossing guard staff and strict speed enforcement in school zones.

Evaluation:
Accountability is established to implement the Plan, including formal adoption by the School Board and
City Council; Conduct an annual travel survey at each school.

Equity:
Allocate resources to school and students based on need and impact.

The plan identifies ongoing programmatic needs—such as education, encouragement, and coordination
across schools—which would require dedicated staff capacity from Fayetteville Public Schools as well as
the City to implement effectively.

City and FPS staff and a Technical Advisory Committee worked closely with Toole Design Group through
the planning process. In-person meetings were held with each school’s principles that included school
resource officers, crossing guards and bike education faculty and an open house event held at Woodland
Jr. High School. Public input for this plan was also extensive. Online surveys had over 500 responses and
student travel tallies were conducted across all 16 campuses, totaling more than 3,000 students.
Budget/Staff Impact:
None
Attachments: FINAL DRAFT_Unadopted Fayetteville Safe Routes to School Plan




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 •
• • •
 • •

 Fayetteville . - - - - - -..-.;., ,
 ' ••


 '
 ROUTES
 , TO
 ~

 (~~ SCHOOL




 MARCH 2026
 AC
 ACKN
 KNOW
 OWLE
 LEDG
 DGME
 MENT
 NTSS

This Safe Routes to School Plan was made possible through the Northwest Arkansas
Regional Planning Commission and the Carbon Reduction Program, funded by the
USDOT.

We are deeply grateful to the City of Fayetteville and Fayetteville Public Schools
for their leadership and partnership in advancing safer, more connected streets for
students.

Most importantly, we thank the teachers, caregivers, and students whose everyday
commitment to health, safety, and wellbeing continues to inspire this work and shape a
more vibrant future for our community.




DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this document is for planning purposes and should not be used for final
design of any project. All results, recommendations, concept drawings, cost opinions, and commentary contained
herein are based on limited data and information and on existing conditions that are subject to change. Further
analysis and engineering design are necessary prior to implementing any of the recommendations contained herein.


Plan prepared by:




II | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 TABLE OF CONTENTS


1 Introduction .............................................1
2 Plan Development and Engagement .........9
3 District-Wide Findings............................23
4 Fayetteville Public School
 Recommendations..................................27


5 City of Fayetteville
 Recommendations..................................35


6 Impact and Implementation...................41
7 Campus Assessments
 and Recommendations...........................45


 FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL | III
 CAMPUS PROFILES
Asbell Elementary School ..................................................................................................... 47
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 49
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 51

Butterfield Trail Elementary School.................................................................................... 53
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 55
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 57

Happy Hollow Elementary School ...................................................................................... 59
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 61
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 63

Holcomb Elementary School ................................................................................................ 65
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 67
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 69

Leverett Elementary School .................................................................................................. 71
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 73
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 75

Owl Creek Elementary School ............................................................................................. 77
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 79
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 81

Root Elementary School......................................................................................................... 83
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 85
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 87

Vandergriff Elementary School ........................................................................................... 89
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 91
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 93

Washington Elementary School ........................................................................................... 95
 Infrastructure Recommendations ......................................................................................... 97
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................... 99




IV | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
John L. Colbert Middle School........................................................................................... 101
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 103
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 105

Holt Middle School .............................................................................................................. 107
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 109
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 111

McNair Middle School......................................................................................................... 113
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 115
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 117

Ramay Junior High School*................................................................................................ 119
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 121
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 123

Woodland Junior High School* ......................................................................................... 125
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 127
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 129

ALLPS School of Innovation .............................................................................................. 131
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 133
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 135

Fayetteville High School ..................................................................................................... 137
 Infrastructure Recommendations ....................................................................................... 139
 Program Recommendations ................................................................................................. 141

* These campuses have been identified for redevelopment as part of the planned feeder pattern.




 APPENDICES
Appendix A: Program Recommendations......................................................................... 145

Appendix B: Bicycle Parking ............................................................................................... 167

Appendix C: Project Recommendations ............................................................................ 169

Appendix D: Prioritized Infrastructure Recommendations............................................ 177

 FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL | V
 DEFINITIONS

 Plan Specifc Terms the pedestrian circulation path and the
 roadway at a flush curb. The surface, in a
 Bicycle and Bike: these terms are color that contrasts with its surroundings,
 interchangeable in the Fayetteville Safe helps to guide persons who are blind or
 Routes to School Plan and describe a have low vision
 pedal-powered vehicle upon which the
 human operator sits. The term “bicycle” FHWA: Federal Highway Administration
 for this Plan includes two-, three-, and FPD: Fayetteville Police Department
 four-wheeled human-powered and
 electrically assisted (e-bike) vehicles. FPS: Fayetteville School District

 Bike Bus/Bike Train: A bike bus or bike HAWK: HAWK (High-Intensity Activated
 train is an organized group of riders— Crosswalk) signals are traffic signals that
 typically students and adult volunteers— allow pedestrians to cross the road safely.
 who ride bikes together along a set route HAWK signals operate in a YELLOW–
 on a schedule, similar to a traditional RED–FLASHING RED sequence to alert
 school bus. Participants join at designated motorists that pedestrians need to cross
 "stops" and travel as a group to school. the road. Unlike traffic signals, the HAWK
 only operates when a pedestrian pushes
 Walking School Bus: Similar to a bike the crossing button. Vehicles are free to
 bus, a walking school bus is a group of move when no one is crossing the street.
 walkers—including students and adult
 volunteers—who walk to school together LPI: Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs)
 on a set route and schedule. are low-cost adjustments to signal timing
 to increase pedestrian safety at signalized
 intersections. An LPI gives pedestrians
 General Terminology a typical 3- to 7-second head start before
 and Acronyms vehicles in the parallel direction are given
 the green signal indication. LPIs can help
 AASHTO: American Associated of State reduce conflicts between pedestrians and
 Highway and Transportation Officials left- or right- turning vehicles. The LPI
 ADA: Americans with Disabilities Act works to position the pedestrian within
 the crosswalk thereby decreasing the
 ARDOT: Arkansas Department of likelihood of a conflict or crash with a
 Transportation left- or right-turning vehicle ahead of the
 DWS: Detectable Warning Surfaces, turning traffic.
 which include truncated domes, provide MUTCD: Manual on Uniform Traffic
 a continuous detectable edge between Control Devices

VI | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 ACKN
 DEOW
 FINI
 LETI
 DGON
 MES NTS
NACTO: National Association of City Shared use paved trails may also be used
Transportation Officials by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users,
 joggers, and other active transportation
NWARPC: Northwest Arkansas Regional
 users. Shared use paved trails are also
Planning Commission
 commonly referred to as trails, paths, or
Pedestrian Refuge Island: A median greenways.
with a refuge area that is intended to help
 Speed Cushion: A speed cushion consists
protect pedestrians who are crossing a
 of two or more raised areas placed laterally
multi-lane road. This countermeasure is
 across a roadway. Unlike speed tables or
sometimes referred to as a crossing island,
 speed humps, speed cushions have gaps
refuge island, or pedestrian island. The
 (often referred to as "cutouts") between the
presence of a pedestrian refuge island at a
 raised areas to enable a vehicle with a wide
mid-block location or intersection allows
 track (e.g., a large emergency vehicle, some
pedestrians to focus on one direction of
 trucks, some buses) to pass though the
traffic at a time as they cross, and gives
 feature without any vertical deflection.
them a place to wait for an adequate gap
in oncoming traffic before finishing the SRO: School Resource Officer
second phase of a crossing.
 SRTS: Safe Routes to School
ROW: Right-of-way
 SS4A: The SS4A (Safe Streets and
RRFB: A Rectangular Rapid Flashing Roads for All) program awards federal
Beacon (RRFB) can be used to accompany transportation funds to regional, local, and
a pedestrian warning sign. RRFBs consist Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent
of two, rectangular-shaped yellow roadway fatalities and serious injuries.
indications, each with a light-emitting
 TAC: Technical Advisory Committee
diode (LED)-array-based light source.
RRFBs flash with an alternating high USDOT: United States Department of
frequency when activated to enhance Transportation - the Federal Agency
conspicuity of pedestrians at the crossing responsible for overseeing, regulating, and
to drivers. supporting the Nation's transportation
 systems.
Shared Use Paved Trail/Path: A bikeway
physically separated from motor vehicle
traffic by a buffer or barrier and located
either within the street right-of-way
(also referred to as a Street-side trail or
sidepath), within an independent right-
of-way, or within a permanent easement.

 FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL | VII
 1
 Introduction




1
n and Goals




 2| 2
Introduction
As the largest city in Northwest Arkansas, actions and identifies and prioritizes
Fayetteville is widely recognized as infrastructure improvements that increase
the region's academic nexus, outdoor safety for—and increases the number of—
playground, and economic hub. Home children walking, bicycling, and rolling to
to more than 103,000 residents 1—and school in Fayetteville.
projected to surpass 150,000 people by
20502—Fayetteville has evolved into the Mobility, Health, and
southern gateway of a rapidly growing Sustainability
region.
 This SRTS Plan is aligned with several
Fayetteville's Public School District has adopted City and District plans that
grown in tandem. Spread across 118 collectively advance a vision of safe
square miles, the District oversees nine mobility, public health, and sustainability.
elementary schools, three middle schools, These include the City of Fayetteville
two junior high schools, one alternative Climate Action Plan, City of Fayetteville
school, and one high school, enrolling Active Transportation Plan, Community
10,171 students—nearly half of whom Safety Action Plan, FPS mission, and FPS
(4,425) qualify for free and reduced lunch. Sustainability Action Planning Goals.

With more than ten thousand students
enrolled in the District, and 34,000
enrolled at the University of Arkansas,3
thousands of students and families
navigate Fayetteville's streets and
sidewalks each morning and afternoon.

Walking and bicycling are fun, healthy
ways for students to get to school in Sustainability Action Planning Goals
Fayetteville. However, many students 2025
and caregivers do not feel safe walking
or bicycling to school due to busy streets,
missing sidewalks, unmarked crossings,
or other barriers.

This Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan
recommends policy and programmatic

1
  U.S. Census Bureau Quickfacts: Fayetteville City, Arkansas, U.S. Census Bureau, www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/
fayettevillecityarkansas/PST045224.
2
 "Forward 2050: Regional Transportation Plan (Draft)." Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission, December 5, 2025, p. 26.
3
 Quick Facts, University of Arkansas, https://www.uark.edu/about/quick-facts.php.

3 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Safe Routes to School:
A Comprehensive Approach
The SRTS program is guided by a Enforcement
comprehensive approach known as
 The public typically thinks of
the Six E's, which together address the
 enforcement as officers writing tickets.
physical, educational, cultural, and
 In fact, enforcement, especially for SRTS
systemic factors that influence how
 programs, is a network of community
students travel to school.
 members working together to promote
Engineering and Planning safe walking, bicycling and driving.
 This can be accomplished through
Infrastructure improvements (e.g., signage,
 safety awareness, education and,
crosswalks, signals, etc.) designed to
 where necessary, the use of ticketing
improve the safety of people walking,
 for dangerous behaviors. Enforcement
bicycling, and driving along school routes.
 includes students, parents, adult school
Education crossing guards, school personnel
 and neighborhood watch programs
Classes and activities that teach children all working in conjunction with law
(and their parents) bicycle, pedestrian enforcement.
and traffic safety skills, the benefits of
bicycling and walking, the best routes to Evaluation
get to school, and the positive impacts
 Evaluation helps understand the
these activities have on personal health
 underlying issues that need to be
and the environment.
 addressed and inform how the projects
Encouragement and programs of each of the other "Five
 Es" can be most effective. Strategies also
and Engagement assess programs as they are implemented
Events and activities that spark interest and adjusts to meet the needs of school
in both parents and students in walking communities.
and bicycling to school. Encouragement
programs reward participation, build Equity
excitement about walking and bicycling, Equity ensures that SRTS initiatives
and inform children and adults about benefit all demographic groups, with
the personal and community benefits of additional attention toward addressing
walking to school. Listening to children, barriers and ensuring safe and healthy
families, school staff and community outcomes for lower-income students,
partners to build creative, equitable, and students of color, and others that face
meaningful engagement opportunities significant disparities.
into the program structure.

 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS | 4
Vision and Goals
Toole Design Group met with the Plan's The goals of the Plan relate to the Six E's
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to described previously:
listen, discuss, and share progress as the
project developed. The TAC collaborated
 Engineering and Planning:
on a guiding vision for the Plan, agreeing Address all infrastructure gaps
on the following statement: "We envision within a 1/4-mile of every school and
safe and accessible routes to school identify safe routes to each school.
that encourage active travel and help
 Education:
students move confidently through
 Provide on-the-bike education
their community and reduce traffic for
 to students K-6; Provide driver
everyone."
 education for caregivers at every
 school and driving students at high
 We envision: full school.

 bike racks, busy Encouragement and
 sidewalks, and no Engagement:
 Provide walk/bike programming at
 long car lines at all schools to help achieve the Plan's
 pick-up. school-specific mode share goal,
 increasing the number of students
 who walk, bike and roll to school by
Mode Share Goals 50% by 2029.
To account for differences in school
location, size, and enrollment, this Plan Enforcement:
establishes a school-specific mode share Ensure every school has full
goal: a 50% increase in walking, bicycling, crossing guard staff and strict speed
and rolling on each campus—from enforcement in school zones.
current mode share splits observed today,
to those observed three years after the Evaluation:
Plan's adoption. Accountability is established to
 implement the Plan, including formal
The goal will measure the percentage adoption by the School Board and
of students walking, bicycling, or City Council; Conduct an annual
rolling on a fair weather day. Accurate travel survey at each school.
progress depends on proper evaluation
practices, including an annual travel tally Equity:
performed at a similar time each year Allocate resources to school and
during a fair weather week. students based on need and impact.

5 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
City and School
District Partnership
Roles and Responsibilities The City of Fayetteville Engineering
 Division leads the technical and
In Fayetteville’s Safe Routes to School
 infrastructure components of the
effort, the School District and the City
 program. Their responsibilities
work together through defined and
 include designing and implementing
collaborative roles. The Fayetteville
 improvements such as sidewalks, shared
Public Schools District anchors the
 use trails, crossings, and traffic-calming
initiative by engaging students, families,
 measures, and ensuring projects align
and staff, identifying safety concerns
 with best practices and long-range
near campuses, gathering community
 transportation plans. Their expertise
input, integrating walking and bicycling
 transforms community priorities
education into curricula, and promoting
 into functional and high-quality
safety and connectivity on school
 infrastructure.
campuses. Their day-to-day connection
with families ensures that the program The Fayetteville Police Department (FPD)
responds directly to student needs and supports SRTS by focusing on safety,
lived experiences. education, and enforcement. Officers




IMAGE 1.1 Bike to School Day 2025 at Holt Middle School

 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS | 6
help enforce speeding in school zones, team—sharing information, coordinating
can educate students and drivers about on project priorities, and aligning efforts
safe behaviors, and provide crash reports to support student safety and mobility. A
that can inform transportation safety coordinated approach ensures that each
decisions. Their involvement strengthens partner’s strengths reinforce the others.
safety during peak travel periods and The cooperative framework also increases
helps address concerns raised by families efficiency by reducing duplication of
 efforts, speeding up problem solving, and
or school administrators.
 strengthening community trust in the
The Parks and Recreation Department SRTS program.
contributes by maintaining and
enhancing the City’s active transportation Funding
network on park property, many of The SRTS Plan was funded by a $100,000
which can form key off-street connections grant from the Arkansas Department
near schools. Their stewardship ensures of Transportation’s Carbon Reduction
that these routes remain accessible, Grant (CRP) fund. The City and FPS
comfortable, and well-integrated into the funded the required 20% match equally,
broader walking and bicycling network each providing $12,500. Funding for the
serving students. various efforts under SRTS can come from
City of Fayetteville Code Enforcement various sources. Currently, off-campus
provides an additional layer of support infrastructure projects may be funded by
by helping ensure that the built the City through the City’s budget, the
environment around schools adheres Bond Program, federal Formula Grants,
to city ordinances and safety standards. or federal discretionary funding. The
Their work includes addressing issues City funds infrastructure up to but not on
such as overgrown vegetation, obstructed school property. FPS funds on-campus
sidewalks, or property-related hazards improvements using its own budget,
that may impede safe travel. By supported by the local millage rate, and is
responding to complaints and proactively also eligible for federal Formula Grants,
identifying barriers along school routes, federal discretionary funding, and state
Code Enforcement helps maintain safe funding.
and accessible pathways for students. The City and FPS have historically shared
 resources and benefits to some degree,
Cooperation as seen by the recent Midtown Corridor
The success of Fayetteville’s SRTS completion up to (but not including)
program relies on ongoing, proactive Woodland Junior High property.
cooperation between the School District Additionally, FPD officers as well as the
and multiple City departments. Rather City Mobility Coordinator have provided
than working independently in parallel, bicycle safety education throughout the
these partners operate as an integrated years.

7 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
INTRODUCTION AND GOALS | 8
 2 Plan Develop
 Engage




9
 pment and
ement




 | 10
Process process, conducted over the course of
 the 2024-2025 school year, involved an
Overview audit of existing walking and bicycling
 infrastructure and observations of traffic
The Plan was developed through a flow and behaviors during arrival and
phased process detailed below: dismissal. It also included an online
 Fayetteville SRTS Community Survey
 Fall 2024 and interactive map that were open to
 Grant Awarded the community and distributed by the
 City, district, and individual schools to
 gather information and feedback from
 Travel observations
 Winter parents, students, staff, and the larger
 and infrastructure
 2024/25 community. Finally, the project team
 audits performed
 met with leadership and stakeholders
 at each school and conducted classroom
 Community survey, travel tallies during the spring of 2025 to
 Spring school survey, and complete a profile of existing conditions
 2025 school meetings for each campus.

 School Arrival and
 Analysis performed
 and plan elements Summer/ Dismissal Observations
 developed Fall 2025
 On December 9 - 11, 2024, three two-
 person teams visited all sixteen schools to
 observe arrival and dismissal. Personnel
  Winter Plan drafted positioned themselves at the primary
 2025/26 and presented entrances and exits of schools either at
 arrival and/or dismissal and recorded
 observations, including:
 Spring 2026 • Travel patterns for passenger
 Plan finalized vehicles, buses, and students walking
 and adopted
 and bicycling
 • Safety concerns associated with
Data Collection arrival and dismissal
 • Existing infrastructure and potential
and Analysis improvements
 • Programs currently in place that are
To support the creation of the Plan and
 focused on active transportation
help stakeholders better understand how
students travel to and from school, Toole Observations recorded the location of
Design conducted in-depth data collection crossing guards, improved crossings,
at each of the sixteen FPS Buildings. This dangerous traffic conditions, primary

11 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
IMAGE 2.1 Infrastructure audits at each campus helped identify site-specific recommendations
designed to improve access and safety for all travel modes (Asbell Elementary above)


walking/cycling routes, and more. and comfort of the greatest number of
Approximate counts of students students.
walking and cycling were also recorded.
 After key walking and cycling routes
These observations are summarized in
 were identified from arrival and dismissal
Section 7 - Campus Assessments and
 observations, a four-person team of
Recommendations.
 planners and engineers conducted a walk
 audit to assess existing pedestrian and
Infrastructure Audits: bicycle infrastructure along these routes
Technology and Tools and critical crossings near each school.
The project team created base maps These SRTS safety audits centered on
showing a quarter-mile radius around the travel needs of children and youth,
each school to capture the street network recognizing that their cognitive and
most likely to be used by students and physical abilities differ from adults,
families who walk or bike to school. increasing both the likelihood of errors
By identifying key routes and critical and vulnerability to crash forces. The
school crossings, the team was able to audits also acknowledged that school are
focus its observation of travel behaviors unique destinations—places where large
and evaluate infrastructure needs at the numbers of children and high activity
locations where multiple travel modes levels occur in short arrival and dismissal
converge and the potential for conflicts windows—and that they often function
is highest. This approach prioritized as community hubs with facilities used
areas most likely to influence the safety beyond the school day.


 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 12
Community Survey and location-specific infrastructure and
 behavior concerns.
A community survey was distributed via
diverse channels through the City, FPS, Analysis findings and insights from the
and community partners. The project Fayetteville SRTS Community Survey
team collected a total of 593 responses, will support infrastructure audits,
with a 74% completion rate. school observations, and other data
 sources compiled or evaluated, all of
Toole Design identified clear patterns in
 which will serve as the foundation for
community feedback regarding barriers
 infrastructure, policy, and programming
and opportunities to increasing safe
 recommendations in the Fayetteville SRTS
walking and bicycling to school at the
 Action Plan.
sixteen existing Fayetteville Public School
campuses. The survey also inquired about About Survey Participants
safety and mobility concerns around the Participants were asked a series of
sites of two new public schools planned questions to identify their household and
for construction in the coming few years. personal affiliations with Fayetteville
For open-ended feedback, results were Public Schools (FPS) in general and with
categorized into broad safety themes individual schools. A strong majority


 “How Are You and/or Your Family Affiliated with FPS?”
100%

90%

80% 75%
70%

60%

50% 49%
 44%
40%

30%

20%
 10%
10% 6% 7%
 4%
 0%
 Student Parent Alumni Staff Faculty Fayetteville Other
 Resident

FIGURE 2.1 Household and personal affiliations with FPS in general and with individual schools


13 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
(75%) indicated that they are parents of for overlapping characteristics for each
FPS students, half indicating they are response.
residents, and another 47% identifying
as households with students. Smaller
 Existing Travel Patterns
percentages identified as alumni, staff, To establish a general sense of modes of
and faculty. travel to and from school, participants
 were asked to identify all the ways they
Nearly all participants (88%) indicated or their children got to and from school
an affiliation with one or more individual in the previous month. A strong majority
FPS campuses, with the highest (88%) selected “Drive to/from school,”
school-based rates of participation while significant numbers also noted
from Fayetteville High School and that they walked (25%), bicycled (20%),
Happy Hollow Elementary, at 20% and or took the school bus (27%) during that
15% of survey respondents affiliated, time frame. Additionally, 18% responded
respectively. that they walk to or from a remote drop-
Note that respondents were allowed to off location near their school, rather
check all options that apply, allowing than being driven directly to or from the
 campus.


 “What Are All the Ways You Traveled to/from School?”

 88%




 27%
 25%
 20% 18%


 3% 1% 2%
 1%

  Walk Bicycle School Activity Public Drive Remote E-scooter Other
 Bus Bus Transit drop-off

FIGURE 2.2 Distribution of travel modes to and from school over a one month period


 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 14
 Travel Modes to and from School
 Arrival (AM) Dismissal (PM)

 1% 1% 8% 1% 2%
 2% 8% 12%
 4%
 4%
 10%


 1%



 18%

 3%
 1%
 73% 51%



 Preferred Travel Mode to and from School
 3%
 4% 1%
 20%




 36%




 23%


 1%
 12%

 Walk Bicycle School Bus Activity Bus Public Transit
 Drive to/from School Walk to/from remote drop-off E-scooter Other

FIGURE 2.3 AND 2.4 Existing and preferred travel patterns to/from school. A larger share of
students choose to walk, roll, and/or bike at dismissal (PM) than arrival (AM).

15 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
When respondents were asked what 3. School Siting and Land Use
would be the most impactful change to • Build schools in neighborhoods rather
increase students walking and cycling, than on major arterials
several themes arose: • Add more smaller schools to reduce
 distance from students’ homes
1. Safe Infrastructure
 • Increase housing density near schools
 • Continuous sidewalks
 • Protected bike lanes (physical barriers 4. Culture, Education, and Programs
 preferred) • Group travel for safety (walking
 • Multiuse trails reaching more school buses/bike trains)
 neighborhoods • Parent or volunteer supervision
 • Safe crossings (e.g., signals, flashing • Community campaigns encouraging
 beacons, raised crossings) walking/cycling
 • Bridges/tunnels over major arterial • Incentives for students who walk/
 roads bike
 • Better lighting • Educating drivers about yield-to-
 • Wider sidewalks with buffers from pedestrian law
 motor vehicles • Addressing crime/homelessness
 • Resolve specific problem areas: concerns along walking routes
 ○ Mission Boulevard and Crossover 5. Reduce Car Dependence
 Road • Restrict parent pick-up/drop-off for
 ○ M.L.K. Boulevard and Stadium close-in families
 Street • Improve public transit options
 ○ Rolling Hills Drive
 ○ Old Missouri Road
 ○ College Avenue
 ○ Joyce Boulevard and Crossover
 Road
 ○ Township Street and Vandergriff
 Drive
2. Improve Safety and Enforcement
 • Stronger traffic enforcement,
 especially in school zones
 • Police presence during arrival/
 dismissal
 • More crossing guards
 • Reduced speed limits; traffic calming
 (e.g., speed cushions, enforcement
 cameras)
 IMAGE 2.2 A morning bike commute to Root
 Elementary School


 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 16
Classroom Travel Tallies Additional Data
As part of the data collection effort, home- Crash Data
room teachers across the District used a Crash data for the most recent period
Google Form to measure morning and (2019-2024) was obtained from the
afternoon transportation modes and to Arkansas Department of Transportation
identify opportunities for improvement. (ARDOT). Crashes were analyzed to
Results for individual schools can be seen determine the frequency of occurrence
in Section 7 - Campus Assessments and within a quarter mile of each school.
Recommendations. Unfortunately, data is Interactive Map
not available for Fayetteville High School,
 As part of the public engagement phase,
ALLPS, and Ramay Junior High School.
 an interactive map was published to
Across almost all schools, walking and allow community members to submit
cycling was observed to be considerably locations where they feel safe or unsafe.
higher in the afternoon than in the Respondents also had the opportunity
morning. With many caregivers working to propose possible improvements to be
in the afternoon, and with pick-up lines made. In total, 159 comments were made
longer and more time consuming than on the interactive map.
morning drop-off, it is common for parents
to allow their children to walk home after Student Proximity
being dropped off in the morning. Anonymized student residence data was
 provided limited to the data latitude,
Transportation by car was lowest in longitude, and school of attendance. This
fifth and sixth grades at 39% and 41%, allowed for an analysis of how many
respectively. It is at this age that bicycling students live in proximity to the schools
was observed to be highest (3-4%). they attend.

 Grade Walk Bike Scooter Bus Carpool Car Other

 Kindergarten 8% 1% 0% 21% 2% 65% 3%

 First 8% 1% 0% 21% 4% 61% 5%

 Second 7% 2% 1% 23% 3% 60% 4%

 Third 7% 1% 0% 26% 3% 61% 2%

 Fourth 7% 1% 1% 29% 3% 57% 3%

 Fifth 5% 4% 0% 47% 3% 39% 1%

 Sixth 6% 3% 0% 45% 3% 41% 2%

 Seventh 1% 0% 0% 27% 16% 56% 0%

 Eighth 1% 0% 1% 21% 13% 63% 0%

TABLE 2.1 Travel mode by grade (Kindergarten - Eighth)

17 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 “What is the one change
 that would have the greatest
 impact on the number of
 children who can safely
 “ Dedicated crossing guards.
 We have lights and a crosswalk




 ”
 near our house and drivers still
 walk and roll to school?” don’t stop even with flashing lights.




“ The elementary student population
that lives in the neighborhood south of

 “
Rolling Hills Drive could easily walk to school
but trying to cross Rolling Hills anywhere
 Lighting. I absolutely
 would not let my children walk
 in the fall or winter in the current




 ” ”
between College Avenue and Old Missouri pitch black of the route. Need
Road is taking your life in your hands. high-visibility for safety from
 cars and predators or bullies.




 “ I wish there was a critical
 mass of kids/parents going
 to school on bikes or walking
 “ I think bringing back a bike
 train would be helpful. Have a parent




 ”
 together at the same time and same or volunteer that would lead kids to
 route. If there were enough of us, school on bikes could be a success.
 we could keep each other safe. Or




 ”“
 even if we could have a designated



 ”
 route that was closed to traffic. Enforcing speed limits.




“ The district needs to give junior
 high and high school kids access to
 lockers at school where they can store
 their belongings. Forcing kids to carry
 all of their belongings every day to/from
 “ Better enforcement of school
 zone speeds, as well as area roads
 near schools that would be used
 to walk/bike. I drive through 3-4
 every morning on my way to work
 and see people driving too fast all



 ” ”
 school in very heavy backpacks, is a
 barrier to biking and walking to school. the time with no police presence.




 “ Protected bike lanes on
 major streets and people blowing
 through red lights or making
 right turns on red and not being
 “ More groups coming together
 to make it safer and easier and less
 ‘out of the norm.’ Some incentives or
 recognition for those that do choose



 ”
 mindful of walkers or bikers. to ride or walk could help encourage



 ”
 this as well! I’m excited about this!



 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 18
Stakeholder Engagement and Media
Technical Advisory ○ Special Operations Division
 ○ School Resource Officer (SRO)
Committee Lead
A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Arkansas Department of
was formed to involve key stakeholders Transportation (ARDOT)
in the development of the Plan. The ○ Bicycle-Pedestrian Coordinator
Committee’s role was to provide
 Two meetings were convened involving
guidance, represent perspectives of their
 the TAC: the first to launch the project
organizations, keep their organizations and the second to review the draft
informed about Plan activities, assist with version of the Plan. The first meeting
public outreach, and to review materials was held in December 2024 to introduce
related to the Plan. the project, engagement strategy,
The TAC included the following
members:
• City of Fayetteville
 ○ Public Works Director
 ○ Director of Parks, Natural
 Resources, and Cultural Affairs
 ○ GIS Director
 ○ Mobility Coordinator
• Fayetteville Public School Board
• Fayetteville Public Schools
 ○ Superintendent
 ○ Deputy Superintendent
 ○ Outdoor Education and
 Sustainability Specialist
 ○ Safety Program Director
 ○ Director of Transportation
 ○ Director of Student Health
• Fayetteville Public Education
  Department
 ○ Executive Director
 • Fayetteville Police Department
 ○ Community-Oriented Policing
 Division
 ○ Administration IMAGE 2.3 StoryMap of Fayetteville Safe
 Routes to School Action Plan


19 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
and planned school observations and
infrastructure assessments. Additionally,
a visioning exercise was facilitated
in order to develop a draft vision
statement and goals of the Plan. The
second meeting was held in January
2025 to review the draft Plan, including
the proposed vision statement and
goals of the Plan, school profiles,
recommendations (infrastructure,
programs, and policies) and concept-
level cost opinions. Feedback gathered
from members of the TAC were used to
further strengthen the Plan.

Stakeholder Meetings
In April and May 2024, the project
team met with the principals, assistant IMAGE 2.4 “Fayetteville seeks resident input
 on Safe Routes to School plan.” Northwest
principals, and PE teachers of all
 Arkansas Democrat Gazette, April 10, 2025.
sixteen schools to discuss preliminary
findings, gather perspectives from In September 2024, the project team met
school leadership, learn about existing with the Superintendent and Deputy
programs and operations, and identify Superintendent to discuss the Plan. The
opportunities. The meetings often group discussed speed enforcement on
shared safety concerns, challenges filling school property, existing and potential
crossing guard positions, to what degree programs, funding mechanisms for
bicycle education is provided, and infrastructure recommendations, and
described coordination with SROs. goal alignment between the City and
 School District.
In May 2024 at the FPS Sustainability
Summit, SRTS was introduced as a key
strategy for advancing the District’s
 Website and Media
broader sustainability goals. Framed Coverage
within FPS’s commitment to deepening A website for the project was developed as
its environmental practices, SRTS was a StoryMap in January 2025 and published
presented as both a health and climate- in February. The website highlighted the
forward initiative that can reduce vehicle purpose of the Plan and invited users to
trips, improve air quality, and support share their feedback through the public
active, independent children. survey and interactive map.

 PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 20
Multiple news outlets highlighted
Fayetteville’s Safe Routes to School
 Public Open House
initiative, giving it broad regional In February 2026, as recommendations for
visibility. Coverage from 5NEWS, the SRTS Plan were being finalized, the
KNWA FOX24, the Northwest Arkansas public was invited to join an open house
Democrat-Gazette, and the Fayetteville to share feedback on the infrastructure
Flyer emphasized the project’s goals— and programming recommendations
safer walking and bicycling for proposed at each school. A kids zone
students—and the City’s call for public gave children the chance to ride bikes
input. Together, these stories showed through an obstacle course, color
strong media interest and helped build SRTS-themed handouts, and play other
community awareness and engagement games. Participants reviewed the Plan's
around the planning effort. major themes and outcomes and shared
 feedback on implementation.




IMAGE 2.5 Catered food and kids' activities helped draw caregivers and students to the
Fayetteville SRTS Plan Open House at Woodland Junior High, February 2026.

21 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND ENGAGEMENT | 22
 3
 District-Wid




23
de Findings




 | 24
Connectivity These conditions can create challenges
 for people using wheelchairs or mobility
As the City continues to advance its goal devices and raise safety concerns for all
of expanding the trail network to reach pedestrians and bicyclists.
97% of residents by 2040, neighborhood Similar gaps in sidewalk connectivity
schools have increasingly benefited and curb ramp infrastructure can also be
from improved connectivity. Recent trail found in some of the older neighborhoods
projects have enhanced access to several surrounding school campuses. While
Fayetteville Public Schools, including the City funds annual sidewalk and trail
Root Elementary (Mission Sidepath, construction programs, ramp repairs and
2025), Woodland Junior High (Midtown sidewalk gap closures have historically
Corridor, 2025), and Holcomb Elementary focused on locations that are both highly
(Clabber Creek Trail, 2021). Since the City impactful and feasible to construct. As
does not construct trails on FPS property, these programs progress, remaining gaps
collaboration is required so that trails often involve additional complexity,
continue past a school's property line and such as utility conflicts with transformer
connect trail users to school entrances boxes, electrical poles, or other fixed
and safe crossings. Once constructed, infrastructure.
on-campus connections vary in design
and consistency. In these cases, trails are
often built near the school, but they lack Safety
a direct, clearly defined access point. As
 Fayetteville Public Schools takes a
a result, many campus connections are
 comprehensive, collaborative approach to
underutilized as reliable school travel
 student safety that combines prevention,
routes for students and families.
 preparedness, and community partnership.
Many of Fayetteville’s older school A key element of this effort is the district’s
campuses were designed and constructed School Resource Officer program, delivered
prior to the widespread adoption of in partnership with the Fayetteville Police
modern accessibility standards. As Department. Trained SROs are assigned
a result, they often lack continuous to schools throughout the district, where
sidewalk networks within the campus they support campus safety, build positive
and between buildings. While sidewalks relationships with students, and provide
may connect primary entrances to education and mentorship alongside
parking areas, routes between doors their law enforcement role. FPS also
are frequently incomplete, requiring maintains district-wide safety protocols
students, staff, and caregivers to navigate focused on prevention, controlled building
parking lots or drive aisles. Curb ramps access, emergency preparedness, and
may also be missing or outdated, clear communication. These measures
interrupting accessible paths of travel. are regularly reviewed to align with best
 practices and are supported by a culture

25 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
that encourages reporting and early Unlike some school districts that only
intervention. Community partnerships provide bus service for students living
further strengthen these efforts. The Safer farther than one mile from school,
Fayetteville initiative, supported by the FPS allows all students living within
Fayetteville Public Education Foundation, their school’s attendance zone bus
helps fund additional safety resources and transportation. There is no policy
enhancements, including updated safety guaranteeing a family’s agency to allow
technology and access to online tools to a student to walk or roll home and there
support digital safety for families. Applying have been instances where the police have
even a fraction of the resources dedicated been called on students walking home
to campus safety toward transportation through areas considered dangerous.
safety could yield significant benefits for the Pedestrian safety is primarily addressed
wellbeing of students. through paid part-time crossing guards.
 These positions are advertised and filled
Maintenance by local school administrators and not
 by District administration. Crossing
Housed under FPS Facilities guards are placed at critical crossings
Management, the Maintenance during peak arrival and dismissal
Department is responsible for the times—typically from 7:30 to 8:00 AM
physical management and upkeep of and from 2:45 to 3:15 PM. Positions are
school buildings and district facilities. often filled with a neighborhood resident
This includes administrative, grounds, or full-time school employee, and can be
warehouse, and transportation buildings. difficult positions to fill given the limited
The department’s goal is to “support pay and hours. Additionally, classified
safe, clean, and productive educational staff including paraprofessionals (e.g.,
environments that are conducive to high teacher’s aides) are typically unable to
student achievement.” Maintenance serve as crossing guards as policy states
staff provides services including they are ineligible for overtime pay.
construction, maintenance, operations,
and groundskeeping. Coordination Although staffed under the City Police
with the department is critical in Department, FPS directs the priorities
executing accessibility and connectivity of SROs. While the presence of law
improvements that meet national enforcement can encourage compliance
standards and best practices. with traffic laws in front of the school,
 logistical and operational constraints

Policies and may limit an SRO's ability to be present
 or available for arrival and dismissal.

Programs SROs are able to issue citations using a
 handheld ticket writer, but in the event of
The District maintains various policies a crash, nearby patrol units are called and
regarding transportation and safety. are responsible for completing the crash
 report.

 DISTRICT-WIDE FINDINGS | 26
 4 Fayetteville P
 Recomme




27
Public School
endations




 | 28
Overview of
District
Policy, program, and infrastructure
recommendations specific to FPS and
its owned properties are outlined in the
following section. While not exhaustive,
these represent priority actions identified
that would make the most significant IMAGE 4.1 Walk, Bike, and Roll to School
impact in the near term. Day hosted by FPS in 2025



District-Wide Recommendations
and Action Items
Safety on Campus FPS is encouraged to develop and
 require training for employed crossing
School safety is a coordinated approach
 guards, providing classroom instruction
involving administration, school staff,
SROs, and crossing guards. Crossing and hands-on practice. Training should
guards play a critical role in ensuring cover traffic control techniques, creating
safe student travel to and from schools. safe gaps for student crossings, effective
Additionally, although SROs are communication, situational awareness,
employees of the City Police Department, and responsibilities associated with
FPS determines when and where officers managing school traffic. Programs such as
report for duty. the Ohio Department of Transportation’s
 Active Transportation Academy provide
Principals are encouraged to collaborate
 a strong example of best practices in
with their assigned SROs to position
patrol vehicles strategically during crossing guard education. Additionally,
student arrival and dismissal times. it is recommended that FPS evaluates
Parking SRO vehicles with emergency staffing needs to ensure schools
lights activated can help increase driver requiring additional crossing guards
awareness and encourage appropriate are able to fill these positions. This
vehicle speeds. Additionally, the visible may include reviewing compensation,
presence of SROs near crosswalks and overtime policies for classified staff, and
school driveways can encourage drivers advertising and recruitment strategies.
to yield to students and pedestrians,
further enhancing safety during peak
travel periods.

29 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
On-Campus Connectivity
Infrastructure
Based on the infrastructure
recommendations made in Section
7, a concept-level cost opinion was
developed for quantifiable infrastructure
recommendations made at various
campuses was estimated across the City.
The cost of sidewalks and shared use paths
needed on school campuses was estimated
as approximately $217,246 (see Table 4.1 IMAGE 4.2 Students and staff overflow the
below). The opinion does not include costs existing bike storage at Root Elementary School
to address all on-campus accessibility
issues which may include sidewalks, infrastructure recommendations, which
ramps, and crosswalks, as detailed lacked sufficient detail to develop
assessments on each school campus were an opinion of cost. For example, the
not a part of this planning effort. recommendations for Butterfield
 Trail include a connection to a future
Section 7 - Campus Assessments and neighborhood development without a
Recommendations includes additional specific alignment.

  Number School Additional Notes Cost

 Washington Install sidewalk to connect to main entrance
 1 $17,100
 Elementary without using stairs.
 Owl Creek Add sidewalk, curb ramps, and marked
 2 $15,250
 Elementary crosswalk.
 John L. Colbert Consider trail connection to Magnolia Crossing
 3 $87,264
 Middle subdivision along property line.
 Connect outlet of “Root Chute” trail to play-
 4 Root Elementary $1,080
 ground blacktop.
 Owl Creek Develop trail connection to future Owl Creek
 5 $22,248
 Elementary trail.
 Holcomb
 6 Install sidewalk outside of fenced area. $7,128
 Elementary
 Happy Hollow Develop ADA-compliant shared use path to fish
 7 $18,792
 Elementary pond.
 Happy Hollow Install paved trail connecting Woodsprings Dr. to
 8 $48,384
 Elementary school.
 Sum $217,246

TABLE 4.1 Cost opinions of sidewalks and shared use paths on school campuses

 FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS | 30
Procedures and Policies Education, and Enforcement, the guide
 provides strategies that can be tailored
The following recommended policies to individual schools or neighborhoods.
and actions are the most critical to Activities range from large community
institutionalize walking and bicycling to events, such as Walk/Roll to School Day
school as safe, healthy, and supported in the fall and Bike to School Day in the
travel options. spring, to ongoing programs like walking
  • Establish a school district policy that school buses, bike trains, frequent walker/
 explicitly encourages students to walk biker incentive programs, and youth
 and bike to school. leadership opportunities. Each strategy
  • Create an SRTS page on the District's includes clear guidance on goals, target
 website, updating it with timely and audiences, materials, staffing needs, and
 relevant SRTS content. implementation steps, making it easy for
  • Include SRTS activities in the school local champions to identify approaches
 division calendar. that fit their capacity and context.
  • Hire an SRTS Coordinator. This
 position should be staffed full-time A central theme of the Guide is building
 and year-round (est. salary range strong partnerships and shared ownership
 $55k-$70k/yr). of SRTS efforts. It emphasizes establishing
  • Amend the school district wellness a district-level SRTS Team composed
 policy to encourage walking and of various stakeholders, including city
 bicycling to school as a form of staff, school representatives, parents,
 physical activity. students, advocates, and public health
  • Establish a district policy that states a and safety professionals with the
 student's ability to walk and bicycle to purpose of implementing the Plan. The
 school is a parental decision. Guide also highlights the importance
  • Adopt standards for bike parking and of youth engagement through a high
 regularly evaluate capacity. school-based Youth Task Force, ensuring
 student voices help shape programs and
Programmatic Strategies culture. Education strategies focus on
An SRTS Strategies Guide (“Guide”) age-appropriate pedestrian and bicycle
was developed to organize and detail safety instruction for students, caregiver
programming recommendations and staff outreach, and driver awareness.
(see Appendix A: Program Enforcement strategies address school
Recommendations). The Guide is a zone safety through crossing guards,
practical resource designed to help safety patrols, and collaboration with law
schools and communities encourage more enforcement. The strategies provide and
students and families to walk, bike, and actionable roadmap to advance safety,
roll safely and comfortably. Organized health, and sustainability while building a
around the Six E’s with a primary focus lasting culture of active travel.
on Encouragement and Engagement,


31 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
District General SRTS event. The SRTS Team would like to
 program Walk & Roll to School Day
Calendar of Events closer to the beginning of the school year
Building on the momentum established and to incorporate scooters into the event
in this Plan, the SRTS Team plans to and educational materials.
participate in Walk & Roll to School Day
 In the near term, the City and School
in the 2026-2027 school year, recognizing
 District are committed to remarking
local advocacy groups, local businesses,
 crosswalks, and the SRTS Team plans
and high school student mentors are all
 to seek additional funding to move the
partners in having a successful SRTS
 priority projects forward.
TABLE 5.2 District General SRTS Calendar of Events

 June 2026 July August September

 • Back-to-school prep
 • Try out routes and
 • Take SRTS Plan to maintenance repairs
 • Begin planning • Schedule education
 city council and for Safe Routes
 for Walk & Roll to events at all schools
 school board for • SRTS Team
 School Day for fall
 adoption Meetings for
 upcoming school
 year

 October November December January 2027




 • International Walk • Schedule education
 • Winter Walk/Roll
 & Roll to School events at schools for
 to School Day
 Day spring




 February March April May




 • Crossing Guard • Safety Education
 • Bike to School
 Appreciation Day/ • Safety Education and summer safety
 Month and Day
 Week prep




 FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS | 32
Funding City Opportunities
 The City is among the list of eligible
Funding for infrastructure and
 applicants for discretionary grants such
programming improvements can
 as the Better Utilizing Investments to
be sourced from several areas.
 Leverage Development (BUILD) and
Some funding may be appropriated
 Safe Streets For All (SS4A), while school
from the FPS annual budget, such
 districts may not apply. These grants
as personnel, programming, and
 focus on planning and implementation
certain facilities maintenance items.
 of impactful alternative transportation
Capital improvements and large-scale
 projects that align with the SRTS Plan.
programming may be funded by a
municipal bond, school millage, and/or
 PTO Opportunities
grant funding.
 PTOs are also known to be major change-
Grant funding can generally be makers with some funding regular PE
categorized as federal, state/local, bike fleet maintenance, events like Bike
and philanthropic. The USDOT to School Day, and even infrastructure
distributes federal transportation improvements, such as installing RRFBs
funding as formula funds to the or sidewalk connections.
Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning
Commission. Additionally, philanthropic
funding may be available for
programming and capital improvements
from local and national foundations.
Regular communication with NWARPC,
ARDOT Local Programs Division,
and charitable foundations are highly
encouraged.

District Opportunities
The District is eligible to apply
under multiple existing programs for
programming, planning, design, and
engineering. These programs include
the Transportation Alternatives Program
(TAP) and Recreational Trails Program
(RTP), where awards range from $20,000
to $500,000 and require a 20% match.



33 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
FAYETTEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS | 34
 5 City of Fay
 Recomme




35
 yetteville
endations




 | 36
Overview of List of Infrastructure
 Recommendations
City Infrastructure Recommendation
Policy, program, and infrastructure Cost Estimates
recommendations specific to the City of Based on the infrastructure
Fayetteville are outlined in the following recommendations made in Section
section. 7, a concept-level cost opinion was
 developed for quantifiable infrastructure
Recommendations improvements located within the public

and Action Items right-of-way and other areas under City
 jurisdiction. These recommendations
 include sidewalks, shared use paths,
Systemic crossing improvements, and
Infrastructure traffic calming identified
Needs along key routes to
 school, typically within
  • Upgrade all traffic a quarter-mile of each
 signals within a school. The estimated
 quarter-mile radius costs reflect only those
 of schools to add improvements for which
 LPI and No-Right- sufficient information
 on-Red, evaluate was available to develop
 sufficient walking phase planning-level estimates (see
 duration, and consider Table 5.1 below). To provide
 protected phasing for pedestrians. a conservative estimate, all
  • Add infrastructure recommendations opinions of cost assume
 within this Plan to the annual concrete work (e.g., curb
 concrete construction plan and five- extensions, pedestrian
 year trail plan. refuge islands, speed
  • Provide staff support to the SRTS cushions, etc.). However,
 Committee. select infrastructure
  • Increase coordination between improvements may
 the City and FPS (e.g., Facilities, also be made using
 Sustainability) by establishing modular materials at a
 regular meetings. lesser cost. A complete
  • Create and adopt policy of “Speed list of infrastructure
 Limit 20 mph” in school zones, recommendations is
 rather than “School Speed Limit 20 provided in Appendix D:
 mph When Children Present.” Prioritized Infrastructure
 Recommendations.
37 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Police Department SROs
 • Review SRO policies to increase
 and enforce safety at arrival and
 dismissal.
 • Coordinate strategic speed
 enforcement campaign throughout
 the year across school zones.
 • Consider a neighborhood
 speed watch program where
 the Department partners
 with volunteers; SRTS Guide;
 Neighborhood Speed Watch
 Programs.
 • Coordinate with ARDOT to
 investigate the benefit of automated
 enforcement devices to support
 on-site law enforcement, allowed
 by Arkansas Code § 27-52-111(c)1
 (2024).




 IMAGE 5.1 ARDOT uses camera technology
 to support in-person law enforcement during
 distracted driving checks.




 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE RECOMMENDATIONS | 38
 Install
 Install Repaint Install Curb Update Curb Install Curb Pedestrian
 School Crosswalk Crosswalk Ramp Ramp Extension Refuge
 Island

 Asbell Elementary School 5 0 1 6 0 0

  Butterfield Elementary
 2 0 0 2 2 2
 School
 Happy Hollow
 7 0 4 1 0 1
 Elementary School
 Holcomb Elementary
 8 1 0 10 4 1
 School
 Leverett Elementary
 9 0 0 8 9 0
 School
  Owl Creek Elementary
 1 0 0 0 6 1
 School

  Root Elementary School 4 0 2 6 0 1

  Vandergriff Elementary
 1 0 3 2 0 1
 School
  Washington Elementary
 21 0 8 11 5 0
 School

 Holt Middle School 2 0 0 1 1 0

  John L. Colbert Middle
 1 0 0 0 0 0
 School

  McNair Middle School 2 1 2 15 4 0

 Ramay Junior High School 1 0 0 11 2 0

 Woodland Junior
 7 3 8 6 3 0
 High School
 ALLPS School of
 4 1 4 1 1 0
 Innovation

  Fayetteville High School 18 4 3 1 0 0

 Total Quantity 93 10 35 81 37 7

 Total Cost $93,000 $8,500 $198,000 $55,400 $464,400 $50,820

TABLE 5.1 Cost opinions for infrastructure recommendations on each campus


39 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Install Install/repair Install Total Cost
 Install Install speed Install stop
Install RRFB Raised sidewalk shared use
 HAWK cushions sign per School
 Crosswalk (LF) path (LF)


 0 0 0 0 0 1,400 1,254 $538,184

 1 0 0 0 0 520 1,936 $518,736

 1 0 1 0 2 0 236 $104,016

 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 $104,910

 1 0 0 0 4 615 0 $197,770

 1 0 1 2 0 205 0 $144,110

 0 0 0 0 0 1,125 0 $122,830

 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $27,700

 0 0 4 1 2 25 830 $373,730

 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 $45,620

 1 0 0 0 0 40 356 $91,496

 0 1 0 0 2 575 1,250 $477,780

 0 0 0 2 0 270 1,220 $342,540

 0 0 0 0 0 720 1,180 $418,810

 2 0 3 0 0 25 0 $81,820

 1 0 1 1 0 1,185 32 $182,962

 9 1 13 8 10 6,705 8,294

 $90,000 $78,000 $130,000 $80,000 $3,900 $477,450 $2,043,504 $3,773,014




 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE RECOMMENDATIONS | 40
 6 Impac
 Impleme




41
ct and
entation




 | 42
Impact Demand
 • School Proximity: This criterion
The level of impact for infrastructure assesses the presence or absence of a
recommendations in this Plan were school within an 1/8th of a mile of the
evaluated using a set of criteria that recommendation.
represents the values and priorities of • Student Density: This criterion
the SRTS program and its stakeholders in calculates the density of students
Fayetteville. The criteria include: living within an 1/8th of a mile of the
Safety recommendation.
  • Street Type: This criterion prioritizes Equity
 recommendations that intersect • Free and Reduced Lunch: This
 high-volume roadways with long criterion is equal to the percent of
 crossing distances by scoring the students receiving free and reduced
 functional class of the road. Scores lunch at the school with which the
 as follows: local (1), minor collector recommendation is associated.
 (2), major collector (3), minor arterial
 (4), and principal arterial (5). For Infrastructure
 recommendations corresponding with • Recommendation Type: The
 intersections, the higher value of the separation of vulnerable road
 two roadways was used. users using sidewalks and trails is
  • Speed Limit: This criterion prioritizes considered a priority, along with
 recommendations that intersect high- improved crossings, such as raised
 speed roadways by scoring based on crosswalks, RRFBs, and HAWKs.
 the speed limit. For recommendations Therefore, a binary criterion assessed if
 corresponding with intersections, the recommendations included sidewalks,
 higher of the two roadways was used. trails, or improved crossings.
  • Crash Data: Crash Data was analyzed For each criterion above, the mean was
 to calculate the density of non- calculated across all recommendations
 motorist crashes that occurred in the and schools. The z statistic was then
 most recent 5-year dataset (2019-2023) calculated—with negative values
 within an 1/8th of a mile of each rounded to zero—to produce the final
 recommendation.




 Safety + Demand + Equity + Infrastructure = Final Impact
Street Type, Speed School Proximity, Free and Reduced Sidewalks, Trails, and Score
Limit, Crash Data Student Density Lunch Improved Crossings


43 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
impact score, where a higher benefit score the recommendations in this Plan. Staff
corresponds to a higher priority. Scores within School District and the City of
were then divided into low, medium, Fayetteville will serve as the primary
and high priorities based on a three-class implementors of the Plan and will be
and equal-interval categorization. The responsible for initiating key actions
table of all 170 prioritized infrastructure with partners to ensure the success of
recommendations can be seen in this SRTS Plan. The immediate steps that
Appendix D: Prioritized Infrastructure should be taken by School District and the
Recommendations. City of Fayetteville to begin the process of
 implementation include the following:
Z Statistic:
 1. Adopt - Work with the City Council
Where is the criterion value, is the
 and School District to formally adopt
mean of the criterion values, is the the SRTS Plan.
standard deviation of the criterion values.
 2. Assess - Identify three to five priority
While the City and School District will recommendations to work towards
try to implement projects by impact over the next year.
level, project implementation may ○ Establish an SRTS Team/Advisory

not occur in the exact order of impact Committee.
based on external factors, such as right ○ Work with the SRTS Advisory

of way acquisition, the type or amount Committee or other groups to
of funding available, coordinating assign lead roles and set up regular
construction, and other resources. check-ins to evaluate progress.
 ○ Incorporate the priority

Implementation recommendations into internal
 work plans for the City and/or
 School District.
The Fayetteville Safe Routes to School
Plan establishes a roadmap for making 3. Apply - If applicable, apply for
walking, bicycling, and rolling to school funding to implement the SRTS Plan.
safer and more accessible for students As with any roadmap, this Plan
of all ages and abilities. Grounded in is not exhaustive nor final. The
extensive data collection and public recommendations listed herein should
engagement, the SRTS Plan incorporates be tailored, scoped, refined, expanded,
the lived experiences of families, and bolstered by future strategies as
educators, and students in seeking the conditions evolve in Fayetteville. Taken
City and FPS goals of safety, health, and as a starting point, this Plan provides
sustainability. actionable steps designed for both
 implementation and experimentation,
It will take time and the combined efforts
 rooted in the perspectives that shape the
of individuals, local and regional entities,
 City.
DOT, and other partners to implement


 IMPACT AND IMPLEMENTATION | 44
 7 Campus Ass
 and Recomm




45
sessments
mendations




 | 46
 Asbell Elementar y School
Number of Students 294

Grades K-4

Percent within 1 mile
 35%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 16%

Percent on Free and IMAGE 7.1 Access to Asbell Elementary School
 87% from Shamblin Apartments to the north
Reduced Lunch

Non-Motorist Crashes within outside. Asbell Elementary School also
 0 has a bike club for fourth graders that
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 meets on Friday for 25 minutes. However,
The theme at Asbell Elementary School personal bicycle ownership is limited
is “Health and Wellness.” A majority and the school has expressed interest in
of students travel to school outside of giveaways for bikes, locks, and helmets.
personal vehicles, with most being bus
riders. Many students who walk to school 1% (2)
are accompanied by adults and arrive 16% (25)
from the west of Sang Avenue, either 39% (61)
from the crosswalk at Skyler Drive or
from the south side of the school. Some
students also walk from the Washington
Plaza Apartments using a cut-through to the
northeast. Speeding on Sang Avenue during
arrival and dismissal is generally limited due
to congestion and speed cushions installed
on the road. A potential sidewalk connection
could be made through the FPS sports
facility that would allow walkers to arrive 44% (69)
from the east.
 Walk Bike Scooter
Students receive bicycle education in
PE, with K-1 students riding indoors Bus Carpool Car Other
on balance bikes and older students
 FIGURE 7.1 Distribution of travel modes at
riding pedal bikes on a small pump track Asbell Elementary School


47 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.1 Asbell Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 48
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation


 Access from apartment complexes to the north - possible
 Shamblin Apartments School
 1 Access
 accessibility/visibility improvements needed. Reduce crossing
 distance by installing calming devices.



 W. Skyler Dr. and N. Evening Install high-visibility crosswalks on north and east legs of
 2 Shade Dr. intersection.



 Possible paved connection (with keyed access) to the east
 3 FPS Sports Facility Access
 through FPS sports fields property and parking lot.



 Stripe parking lot entrance to shorten driveway width and
 N. Sang Ave. (W. Skyler Dr. to
 4 W. Lawson St.)
 formalize parking; consider pavement treatments or curbing to
 formalize narrowed driveway.



 W. Lawson St. and N. Sang
 5 Ave.
 Install curb ramp on southwest corner of intersection.



 Install marked crossing over W. Holly St; update curb ramps
 6 N. Sang Ave. and W. Holly St. for crossing of N. Sang with DWS; install curb ramp on SW
 corner for crossing Holly.


 N. Sang Ave. (Asbell
 Upgrade the existing sidewalk to a sidepath per the City's
 7 Elementary to W. Wedington
 Master Trail Plan.
 Dr.)



 Mark crosswalk across W. Holly St; install DWS on curb ramps
 8 W. Holly St. and N. Sang Ave.
 across east leg.



 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation



  Custom
 12 Front Replace rack
 Weld




49 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.2 Asbell Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 50
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Asbell Elementary School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Expand Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus

 Expand Bike Education

 Walk to School Day

 Expand Bike to School Day

 Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Expand Walk & Roll Events

51 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Sidewalk
  conditions along
Sang Avenue present
accessibility issues for
students walking and
 rolling to Asbell.




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 52
 Butterfeld Trail Elementar y School
 in the bike buffer. An improved active
Number of Students 551
 transportation connection on this wide
 roadway would greatly benefit the
Grades K-4
 neighborhood, as rumble bars have not
Percent within 1 mile been maintained and provide little in
 24%
of School terms of safety or comfort for vulnerable
 road users.
Percent Walking and Bicycling 16%
 Students receive bicycle education every
Percent on Free and fall and spring in PE, with older students
 51%
Reduced Lunch taking a field trip to Mud Creek Trail.
 While balance bikes are kept indoors
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 0 away from the elements, third and
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 fourth grade bikes were stored outside,
A significant number of students resulting in increased deterioration of
were observed walking and bicycling components.
from Butterfield Elementary School
on neighborhood sidewalks and the
adjacent Raven Trail connection. A school 4%(26) 12% (71)
employee accompanies a large group
of walkers south to cross the stoplight 4% (22)
at Old Missouri Road and Rolling Hills
Drive.
Many students—some accompanied by
an adult and some not—walk through
the bus and car lines to parents parked
at the adjacent Fayetteville Health
and Rehabilitation Center. Speeding
can occasionally be a concern on Old
Missouri Road, but less so during the 26% (157)
 51% (310)
congestion of pick-up and drop-off.
Intersections of increased risk include 3% (16)
Old Missouri Road at Eton Street and at
Stubblefield Road. Walk Bike Scooter
 Bus Carpool Car Other
A pilot project installed separated bike
lanes on Rolling Hills Drive in 2019 and FIGURE 7.2 Distribution of travel modes at
was later replaced with rumble bars Butterfield Trail Elementary School


53 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.3 Butterfield Trail School Elementary Walkshed




 Remote Pick-up
 and Drop-off




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 54
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 Widen sidewalk to shared use path from Sweetbriar Dr. to
 N. Old Missouri Rd.
 1 (Sweetbriar Dr. to Farr Ln.)
 Butterfield Elementary. The bridge over Missouri Creek
 poses a design constraint.

 E. Stubblefield Rd. Repair sidewalk panels due to uneven pavement
 2 (in front of #1763) (e.g., drainage inlet on north side).

 E. Stubblefield Rd. Repair sidewalk panels at locations of uneven pavement
 3 (west of #3289) (e.g., drainage inlet on north side).

 E. Stubblefield Rd. (N.
 4 Southridge Dr. to N. Install sidewalk on south side to reach Harold St.
 Summerhill Dr.)

 E. Stubblefield Rd. and N. Mark crosswalk; upgrade curb ramps;
 5 Southridge Rd. monitor vegetation for sightlines.

 E. Stubblefield Rd. (N. Old
 6 Missouri Rd. to N. Southridge Repair uplifted sidewalk panels.
 Dr.)

 N. Old Missouri Rd. and E.
 7 Stubblefield Rd.
 Improve lighting; install RRFB; install refuge island.



 8 E. Farr Ln. and Raven Trail Install high-visibility crosswalk.

 Install a paved connection and safe crossing through car
 Fayetteville Health and Rehab
 9 Center
 pick-up lanes to the remote pick-up/drop-off parking lot and
 Raven Trail north of campus.

 E. Eton St. (Elizabeth Ave. to
 10 Improve sidewalk, especially near driveways, including ADA.
 Old Missouri Rd.)

 N. Old Missouri Rd. to E. Eton Install curb extensions for the west corridors; install center
 11 St. refuge island for the north leg.

 Connect Wagon Wheel neighborhood under construction as of
 12 Wagon Wheel Neighborhood
 summer 2025.


 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation

 Hoop 6 Front Add capacity


 Schoolyard 6 Front Add capacity



55 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.4 Butterfield Trail Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 Remote Pick-up
 and Drop-off




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 56
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Butterfield Trail Elementary School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Expand Walk & Roll Events

 Bike Club




57 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 A crossing
 guard helps
 students cross
 E. Rolling Hills
 Drive and N. Old
 Missouri Road.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 58
 Happy Hollow Elementar y School
Number of Students 501

Grades K-4

Percent within 1 mile
 22%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 5%

Percent on Free and
 50%
Reduced Lunch IMAGE 7.2 Paved trails on private property connect
 the Cliffs Apartments to Happy Hollow Elementary
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 0
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023) to rehabilitate existing trails, provide
 wayfinding, and create programming
Happy Hollow Elementary School is
 for safe walking and bicycling to nearby
uniquely sited near Highway 265 and
 neighborhoods and natural amenities.
Highway 16, in the middle of low-density
residential space. Located on a hilly,
forested property containing a stocked 5% (39) 5% (34)
fishing pond and soft-surface trails, the
theme of the Happy Hollow is “Outdoor
 25% (186)
Education.” To the north of the school, an
expansive apartment complex, called The
Cliffs, contains an additional network of
paved trails along Peppervine Drive.
Due to the school’s auto-oriented
location, cars stack down Peppervine
Drive, occasionally leading drivers to
pass on the left to access the residential 3% (25)
subdivision. This creates dangerous traffic
conditions around the crosswalk due to 61% (449)
limited sight lines. Two teachers serve as
crossing/walking guards, accompanying
about 25 students who walk home west to Walk Bike Scooter
Woodsprings Drive at dismissal. Bus Carpool Car Other

Given the school’s assets and outdoor FIGURE 7.3 Distribution of travel modes at
focus, there are significant opportunities Happy Hollow Elementary School


59 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.5 Happy Hollow Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 60
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation


 1 N. Gem Trail and Trail Access Install curb ramp to access trail.

 The Cliffs Trails should intersect with the sidewalk on Happy
 N. Happy Hollow Rd. and
 2 Hollow Rd. here but was not visible; clear vegetation; add
 The Cliffs Trails
 signage; potential trail to Mt. Sequoyah Woods.

 3 The Cliffs Trails Add trail connection to apartments.

 N. Happy Hollow Rd. and E. Add crosswalk and curb ramps for crossing across Happy
 4 Paddock Rd. Hollow Rd. on south and west legs of intersection.

 5 The Cliffs Trails Add wayfinding to school.

 Recommend constructing trail under overhead power lines
 6 Water/Sewer Easement in water/sewer easement that spans from Peppervine Dr. to
 Happy Hollow Rd.

 E. Peppervine Dr. (west of S.
 7 Connect sidewalk to shared use path; add wayfinding.
 Woodsprings Dr.)

 E. Peppervine Dr. and S. Convert to four-way stop; install high-visibility crosswalks on
 8 Woodsprings Dr. all legs of intersection.

 Recommend crossing improvement, ideally an RRFB with
 E. Peppervine Dr. and The advanced warning for eastbound drivers and raised crossing.
 9 Cliffs Trails Lower-cost recommendation would be in-street Yield to Pedestrian
 sign, and modular crossing island given the roadway width.

 Install double-sided school crossing sign with downward
 10 S. Woodsprings Dr. and Trail pointing arrows; install high-visibility marked crosswalk;
 install curb ramp on west side; install DWS on east end.

 Crossover Rd. and Peppervine
 11 Dr.
 Add Yield to Pedestrian signage for southbound vehicles.

 Happy Hollow Elementary
 12 Install paved trail connecting Woodsprings Dr. to school campus.
 Property
 Happy Hollow Elementary
 13 Property
 Develop ADA compliant shared use path to fish pond.

 Improve long-neglected Happy Hollow Bicycle Course to
 Happy Hollow Elementary
 14 provide space for PE bike unit practice and
 Property future bike clubs/programming.

 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation
 Relocate existing rack onto paved surface
 Schoolyard 16 Side
 under awning; add capacity at front door


61 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.6 Happy Hollow Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 62
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Happy Hollow Elementary School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.

 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus


 Bike Education

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Expand Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Expand Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Expand Bike Club


63 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Paved trails
 across private
property at The Cliffs
Apartments connect
  to Happy Hollow
 Elementary.




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 64
 Holcomb Elementar y School
Number of Students 571

Grades K-4

Percent within 1 mile
 30%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 9%

Percent on Free and
 34%
Reduced Lunch
 IMAGE 7.3 Strong bike education at Holcomb
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 0 Elementary supports active mobility year-round
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 a field trip to ride bikes at Gulley Park and
The theme of Holcomb Elementary School fourth graders at Lake Fayetteville. A bike
is Science, Math, Engineering, Arts, and bus has operated from the west and east of
Technology (STEAM). It is surrounded the school by parent volunteers.
by residential neighborhoods and natural
areas, including Underwood Park, Clabber 2% (19) 1% (7) 18% (151)
Creek Trail, and a soft-surface pump 7% (55)
track on school property. There are two
RRFBs on Salem Road that help facilitate 1% (8) 4% (38)
safe crossings, but no similar crossings
exist along Bentgrass Road, where many
students also cross. One crossing guard
monitors Salem Road and Crystal Drive.
In the afternoon, a staff member monitors
students who cross Crystal Drive at Apatite
Drive, where adults have parked and
walked up.

While a back-of-curb connector trail was 67% (567)
added between the bike racks and Clabber
Creek Trail, it contains repeated 90-degree Walk Bike Scooter
turns that are difficult for young riders and Bus Carpool Car Other
long-frame bikes. All students receive bike
 FIGURE 7.4 Distribution of travel modes at
education in PE, with third graders taking Holcomb Elementary School


65 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.7 Holcomb Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 66
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 N. Salem Rd. and W. Crystal Install DWS at northeast, southeast, and southwest corners;
 1 install curb extensions on northeast and southeast corners; mark
 Dr. crosswalk on west leg; install raised crosswalk on south leg.

 W. Crystal Dr. and N. Rutile Curb ramps missing DWS and marked crosswalk for north
 2 Dr. crossing of N. Rutile Dr.

 Install marked crosswalk on north leg; repaint and upgrade
 3 Apatite Dr. and Crystal Dr. crosswalk on east leg; add mountable curb extension on southeast
 corner.

 N. Quartz Dr. and W. Crystal
 4 Dr.
 North crossing of N. Quartz Dr.


 N. Pyrite Dr. and W. Crystal
 5 Dr.
 Install DWS on northwest corner.


 W. Crystal Dr. and N. Raven
 6 Ln.
 Mark crosswalks on west and north legs of intersection.


 N. Salem Rd. and School
 7 Driveway
 Install pedestrian refuge island.


 Holcomb Elementary
 8 Property
 Install sidewalk outside of fenced area.


 N. Salem Rd. and Bentgrass Mark high-visibility crosswalks on the east and west legs of the
 9 Rd. intersection; install RRFB and raised crosswalk at north leg.

 Holcomb Elementary Upgrade trail to reduce 90-degree turns, adding radius to
 10 Property corners and aligning with Clabber Creek Trail.

 N. Salem Rd. and W. Clabber
 11 Install DWS.
 Creek Blvd.

 Remove vegetation on east side and conduct routine
 N. Salem Rd. and Clabber
 12 maintenance to improve visibility of trail users. Install passive
 Creek Trail detection for RRFB on east side.


 Existing Bike Parking

 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation


 Schoolyard 26 Rear Add visitor rack to front




67 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.8 Holcomb Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 68
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Holcomb Elementary School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Expand Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo
 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK


 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Bike Club

69 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Proximity
 to the Clabber
 Creek Trail presents
 opportunities for
 walking school buses
 and bike buses at
 Holcomb.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 70
 Leverett Elementar y School
Number of Students 224 on its property. The school frequently
 partners with various departments at the
Grades K-4 University of Arkansas; a partnership with
 active transportation staff or students may
Percent within 1 mile
 26% be explored.
of School
 7% (15)
Percent Walking and Bicycling 7%
 32% (69)
Percent on Free and
 65%
Reduced Lunch
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 8
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)

Leverett Elementary School is one of the
City’s oldest schools, located directly
next to the University of Arkansas.
The gridded street network of the 60% (132)
surrounding neighborhood often lacks 2% (4)

complete sidewalk connections and
experiences speeding, distracted driving, Walk Bike Scooter
and occasionally reckless driving. The Bus Carpool Car Other
neighborhood has experienced a high FIGURE 7.5 Distribution of travel modes at
number of pedestrian crashes in recent Leverett Elementary School
years, including three fatalities in the last six
years—one of whom was only nine years
old.
Young drivers frequent this area en route Existing Bike Parking
to the University and High School. ARDOT
 Type Custom Weld
reported an estimate of ten thousand
ADT (average daily traffic) on Garland Total Spaces 8
Avenue in 2024, suggesting that the
road may be a good candidate for a lane
reconfiguration that enhances safety while Location Rear
still accommodating high traffic volumes.
 Replace rack; add
The school provides bike education in its Recommendation
 capacity to front
PE class and plans to install a traffic garden


71 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.9 Leverett Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 72
  Infrastructure Recommendations
 Map ID Location Recommendation

 N. Garland Ave. at W.
 1 Hughes St.
 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection.

 N. Garland Ave.
 Investigate road and/or lane diet to address speeding and allow for
 2 (Wedington/North to vehicle queuing along southbound Garland.
 Cleveland)
 N. Lindell Ave. (Hughes Fill sidewalk gaps at 816 Lindell (east side) and 903 Lindell (west side);
 3 repair sidewalks; prioritize Lindell as north-south bound walking
 to Eagle) collector for neighborhood east of Garland.
 N. Garland Ave. at W.
 4 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection.
 Berry St.

 W. Berry St. and N. Prioritize Lindell Ave. as crossing opportunity for walking route; install
 5 high-visibility crosswalks at west and south legs of intersection; upgrade
 Lindell Ave. curb ramps at southwest and southeast corners; install all-way stop.
 W. Berry St. (Oakland to
 6 Complete sidewalk gaps along north side of Berry.
 Leverett)

 North side of Leverett Consider creating a walking path and entrance to the U of A forested
 7 campus property north of the school for nature program access.

 N. Storer Ave. (North to Remove obstructions and repair sidewalks; complete sidewalk gap at
 8 Cleveland) 815-819 Storer.

 N. Garland Ave. at W.
 9 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection.
 Eagle St.

 N. Lindell Ave. and W. Install high-visibility crosswalks at south and west legs of intersection;
 10 Eagle St. upgrade curb ramps at southeast and southwest corners.

 W. Eagle St. (Garland to
 11 Remove obstructions and repair sidewalks; complete sidewalk gaps.
 Leverett)
 N. Hall Ave. (W.
 Install traffic calming; relocate mailboxes to remove obstructions from
 12 Cleveland St. to W. the sidewalk.
 Wedington)
 W. Cleveland St. (Sang to Formalize sidewalk buffer space from Sang to Oliver with vertical
 13 Oliver) elements; consider extending curb and sidewalk over the long term.

 N. Hall Ave. and W. Reconstruct sidewalk and curb at southwest corner to have crosswalk
 14 Cleveland St. terminate outside driveway apron; install RRFB.
 W. Cleveland St. (N. Repair uplifted panels around drainage inlet at northeast corner of
 15 Garland Ave. to N. Garland and Cleveland; explore options to reduce or remove
 Lindell Ave.) parking space at 1088 Cleveland.
 W. Cleveland St. and N. Add mountable aprons at all four corners; implement LPI and
 16 Garland Ave. No-Right-on-Red; increase pedestrian signal phase.
 Install curb extension at northeast corner and reconstruct curb
 W. Cleveland St. and N. extension at southwest corner. Remove eastbound curb ramp at the
 17 southwest corner. Install DWS at remaining three curb ramps. Convert
 Lindell Ave. two-way stop to all-way and stripe stop bars on Cleveland. Stripe
 crosswalk on north and west leg of intersection.
 N. Garland Ave. (W.
 Evaluate the feasibility of a lane reconfiguration/reduction to address
 18 Cleveland St. to W. speeding.
 Maple St.)


73 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.10 Leverett Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 74
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Leverett Elementary School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus


 Bike Education

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Bike Club


75 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Heavy
 traffc along
 Garland Avenue
  and Cleveland
Street raises safety
  concerns near
 Leverett.




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 76
 Owl Creek Elementar y School
Number of Students 581

Grades K-4

Percent within 1 mile
 29%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 8%

Percent on Free and
 72%
Reduced Lunch
 IMAGE 7.4 Students are accompanied as they
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 0 walk to the Boys & Girls Club after school
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)

Owl Creek Elementary School is located at additional resources, including volunteers,
the corner of Rupple Road and Persimmon community partnerships, and funding to
Street. Given recent development, sidewalk support active transportation.
connectivity is largely complete—except
for key gaps along Persimmon. While a 11% (54) 7% (34)
shared use paved trail exists in front of 1% (6)
the school, there is currently no sidewalk 28% (142)
connection between the trail and the school
entrance. The school would greatly benefit
from additional sidewalks, curb ramps,
and crosswalks on school property.

Adults accompany students leaving as
walkers, with a large group of students
who walk northeast to the Boys & Girls
Club and another group that walks
northwest to nearby neighborhoods. Bike 2% (10)
 52% (265)
education is provided in PE, but it has been
several years since off-site bike rides were
 Walk Bike Scooter
facilitated for fourth graders. The soft-
surface track on school property requires Bus Carpool Car Other
a restoration with regular maintenance.
 FIGURE 7.6 Distribution of travel modes at
School leadership expressed a need for Owl Creek Elementary School


77 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.11 Owl Creek Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 78
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation


 W. Persimmon St. and School Install RRFB and raised crosswalk; consider traffic-calming
 1 Driveway measures (e.g., speed cushions) for approaches.


 N. Wordsworth Ln. and W. Add two sidewalk connections from W. Persimmon St. to
 2 Persimmon St. sidewalks internal to subdivision.


 W. Persimmon St. (N. Rupple Add signage for school speed zone in westbound direction;
 3 Rd. to N. Keats Dr.) install speed cushions.


 W. Persimmon St. and N. Install protected left-turn phase, No-Right-on-Red, and mount-
 4 Rupple Rd. able truck aprons at all corners.


 Owl Creek Elementary Perform rehabilitation and regular maintenance of bicycle
 5 Property course on south side of creek.


 Owl Creek Elementary
 6 Develop trail connection to future Owl Creek Trail.
 Property


 W. Mountain View Dr. and N. Install curb extensions on northeast and southeast corners of
 7 Rupple Rd. intersection; install pedestrian island; mark crosswalk at east leg.


 Owl Creek Elementary
 8 Property
 Add curb ramps at relevant locations across school property.



 9 W. Persimmon St. Install Sidewalk.



 Owl Creek Elementary School
 10 Property
 Add sidewalk, curb ramps, and marked crosswalk.



 Existing Bike Parking

 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation

  Custom Replace racks; add capacity to
 9 Rear
 Weld front; add wayfinding

 Replace racks; add capacity to
 Hoop 10 Front
 front; add wayfinding



79 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.12 Owl Creek Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 80
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Owl Creek Elementary School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Expand Walking School Bus

 Expand Bike Education

 Expand Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Expand Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Bike Club

81 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Additional
 sidewalks,
 curb ramps, and
crosswalks would help
 connect the Rupple
 Road Sidepath to
 Owl Creek.




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 82
 Root Elementar y School
Number of Students 451

Grades K-4

Percent within 1 mile
 34%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 10%

Percent on Free and
 19%
Reduced Lunch

Non-Motorist Crashes within IMAGE 7.5 Bike parking at Root is located just
 1
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023) steps off of the Mission Boulevard Sidepath
Root Elementary School is located on However, the PE teacher hopes to make
Mission Boulevard, adjacent to the good use of the new Mission Boulevard
newly constructed Mission Boulevard Trail for bike excursions.
Sidepath—a busy trail for students who
ride their bikes to school. Speeding vehicles 1% (2) 2% (3)
 9% (17) 10% (19)
are a growing concern near Root, especially
as the School continues to reduce queuing 2% (3) 1% (2)
onto Mission during arrival and dismissal.
The school is surrounded by single-family
neighborhoods and benefits from multiple
pedestrian connections, including the
unique and popular 450-foot sidewalk
called the "Root Chute." Nearly as many
students were observed arriving via the
Root Chute at the rear of the building as the
front of the building during arrival.
 76% (143)
A few critical sidewalk connections and
crossing improvements could significantly
 Walk Bike Scooter
enhance connectivity around the school.
The school property is relatively small Bus Carpool Car Other
and there is no on-campus bike course,
 FIGURE 7.7 Distribution of travel modes at
so the bike education unit often interferes
 Root Elementary School
with students who are out during recess.
83 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.13 Root Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 84
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation


 N. Ramsey Ave. (E. Cicero Ln.
 1 Install sidewalk.
 to E. Mission Blvd.)



 Existing curb ramps missing DWS. Install marked crossing
 2 E. Cain Dr. and N. Jordan Ln.
 across N. Jordan Ln.



 N. Lunsford Ave. and E. Install marked crossing and stop bar across E. Hammond St;
 3 Hammond St. update both curb ramps with appropriate DWS.



 Reconstruct median to provide pedestrian refuge island and
 E. Mission Blvd. and N.
 4 install marked crosswalk and DWS in curb ramps
 Jordan Ln.
 at north leg of intersection.



 E. Mission Blvd. and N. Ranch Complete sidewalk on north side of E. Mission Blvd. to N.
 5 Dr. Ranch Dr. in front of 1428 E. Mission Blvd.




 6 Root Elementary Property Connect outlet of “Root Chute” trail to playground blacktop.



 Install curb ramp on east side; double-side crosswalk signs;
 N. Lunsford Ave. and Root
 7 add “SCHOOL” to crosswalk signs; add thermoplastic rumble
 Chute
 bars on approaches to crosswalk; install lighting.



 E. Hope St. and N. Eastwood Install marked crosswalk across west leg of E. Hope St; add
 8 Dr. curb ramp to northwest corner; add DWS to southwest corner.



 Existing Bike Parking
 Types Total Spaces Locations Recommendation

 Add capacity near front door;
 Schoolyard 10 Rear
 replace rack

 Add capacity near front door;
 Wave 5 Front
 replace rack


85 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.14 Root Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 86
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Root Elementary School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Expand Walking School Bus

 Bike Education

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Expand Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Expand Field Trips

87 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 The "Root
 Chute" greatly
  shortens walks to
school by connecting
 students to a secure
 rear entrance.



 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 88
 Vandergriff Elementar y School
Number of Students 540
 worsened by limited sight lines due to
Grades K-4 the vertical curvature of the road. An
 enhanced crossing is highly desired
Percent within 1 mile at this location. The school has a soft-
 17%
of School
 surface bike course on the property,
Percent Walking and Bicycling 6% but poor wayfinding results in many
 confused students and a lack of use.
Percent on Free and
 16% Bicycle education is provided for two
Reduced Lunch
 weeks every year in PE, and the PTO
Non-Motorist Crashes within funds a fall bike club led by one of the
 0
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 school staff members. The school hosts a
Vandergriff Elementary School sits modest bike/walk to school day on May
adjacent to McNair Middle School 7th in coordination with the District and
in a low-density, residential area of City.
Fayetteville. While Vandergriff is 3% (31)
 6% (63)
accessible by Township Street to the
 1% (8)
north, the School's primary access lies at
 23% (224)
the southern end of Vandergriff Drive
along Mission Boulevard, a high-speed
State highway.

Some students walk to campus from
neighborhoods north of Township
Street, but a large number of students
(one observation noted approximately
 3% (26)
70 students) are accompanied by two
staff members as they cross Mission 64% (635)
Boulevard to the south. While some
students live in this area as well, many
 Walk Bike Scooter
students walk to their adult’s parked car.
 Bus Carpool Car Other
Speeding vehicles are a common
problem on Mission Boulevard, FIGURE 7.8 Distribution of travel modes at
 Vandergriff Elementary School


89 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.15 Vandergriff Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 90
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 Install curb ramps in median and convert into pedestrian
 E. Township St. and N.
 1 Vandergriff Dr.
 refuge along north leg of intersection; add lighting; install a
 raised crosswalk on the east leg of intersection.

 N. Vandergriff Dr. and School
 2 Upgrade curb ramps to ADA standards.
 Entrance

 Reconstruct southwest corner to close north-facing curb ramp;
 install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg; add curb ramp at
 N. Starr Dr. and E. Mission southeast corner for south leg of the crosswalk; adjust signal for
 3 Blvd. northbound traffic to No Right Turn during pedestrian phase;
 add time to pedestrian phase; install stop bar in northbound
 travel lane.

 Install PHB; upgrade curb ramp at northwest corner; re-stripe
 E. Mission Blvd. and N. high-visibility crosswalk at north leg; install rumble bars to
 4 Vandergriff Dr. alert east and westbound vehicles on Mission;
 install pedestrian-scale lighting.

 N. Box Ave. and E. Mission Install high-visibility crosswalk and stop bar at north leg of intersec-
 5 Blvd. tion; install “Yield to Pedestrians” signage along Mission Blvd.
 Geometry and accessibility issues support intersection
 reconstruction (reducing curb radii and the 30' westbound and
 N. Crossover Rd. and E. eastbound lane widths). In the near term, upgrade all curb
 6 Mission Blvd. ramps; add mountable truck aprons at all four corners; narrow
 through and turn lanes as appropriate; adjust signalization to
 add LPI and additional time for pedestrian phase.
 N. Hunters Rdg. and N.
 7 Upgrade curb ramps with DWS.
 Pointer Ln.

 N. Hunters Rdg. and E. Install new curb ramp at southeast corner; upgrade curb ramp
 8 Cherokee Dr. at northeast corner with DWS.

 E. Mission Blvd. (N. Box Ave.
 9 to N. Vandergriff Dr.)
 Install sidepath per the City's Master Trails Plan.

 N. Hunter's Ridge (N. Pointer
 10 Ln. to E. Mission Blvd.)
 Install sidewalk.

 N. Whippoorwill Ct. and Install mini-roundabout or four-way stop. A good candidate
 11 Cherokee Dr. for a tactical urbanism project.


 Existing Bike Parking
 Types Total Spaces Locations Recommendation

 Reposition to accommodate
 Schoolyard 20 Front
 all spaces
 Reposition to accommodate
 Schoolyard 20 Rear
 all spaces

91 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.16 Vandergriff Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 9


 10




 11




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 92
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Vandergriff Elementary School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus

 Expand Bike Education

 Expand Walk to School Day

 Expand Bike to School Day

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Expand Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Expand Bike Club

93 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Upgraded
 curb ramps
 and sidewalks
 at Vandergriff can
signifcantly improve
 campus access and
 connectivity.

 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 94
 Washington Elementar y School
Number of Students 313 teacher still facilitates outdoor rides along
 the Razorback Greenway and nearby trails.
Grades K-4
 8% (35)
Percent within 1 mile
 29% 1% (5)
of School
 23% (100)
Percent Walking and Bicycling 9%

Percent on Free and
 53%
Reduced Lunch

Non-Motorist Crashes within
 2
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)

Washington Elementary School is one
 3% (14)
of the City’s oldest schools, built in
the middle of Fayetteville’s historic, 64% (276)
gridded downtown neighborhood.
Sidewalks in this area are often in poor
condition, obstructed, or lacking adequate Walk Bike Scooter
greenspace. It is common for sidewalks in Bus Carpool Car Other
the neighborhood to lack curb ramps at FIGURE 7.9 Distribution of travel modes at
intersections. Washington Elementary School

Many students walk to campus, often
accompanied by an adult. A crossing
guard is present in the morning (hourly
staff) and in the afternoon (teacher). The
 Existing Bike Parking
RRFB on Maple Street is often used, but
 Types Schoolyard Hoop
parents frequently observe drivers who
fail to yield to pedestrians. Crossing Total Spaces 4 8
College Avenue is another major barrier
for students who walk and bike to school.
 Location Side
Bike education is taught in PE over four
weeks in the fall and three weeks in the Replace existing
spring. Despite the hilly terrain and no Recommendation schoolyard rack; add
 capacity at front door
on-campus bike course, the School's PE


95 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.17 Washington Elementary School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 96
  Infrastructure Recommendations
 Map ID Location Recommendation

 Install crosswalk marking and stop bar on west leg; install curb
 1 N. Park Ave. and W. Ila St. ramp on northwest corner.
 N. College Ave. (E. Davidson Stripe commercial driveways and consider narrowing driveway
 2 St. to E. Maple St.) curb cuts.
 Update curb ramps (2) with DWS at southwest corner; install
 W. Maple St. and N. Forest crosswalk markings on east leg; install north-facing curb ramp
 3 Ave. on southeast corner; convert to all-way stop and add stop bars in
 all directions.
 W. Maple St. (N. Mock Ave.
 4 to N. College Ave.)
 Install speed cushions.

 W. Maple St. and N. Highland Install raised crossing at west leg; install marked crosswalk
 5 Ave.
 at north leg; install curb extension at northeast corner; add
 crosswalk lighting to RRFB.

 W. Maple St. and N. Highland Install curb extension at southwest corner and update southwest
 6 Ave. and southeast curb ramps with DWS.

 7 E. Maple St. and Alley 1315 Install curb ramp on northwest corner.

 N. College Ave. and Maple St. Install LPI; increase pedestrian signal phase; reconstruct southeast
 8 corner to allow ADA and consider closing commercial driveway.

 N. Highland Ave. (between Remove existing crosswalk marking and install raised crossing at
 9 W. Lafayette and E. Maple St.) southeast gym entrance.

 W. Lafayette St. and N. Install marked crosswalk at south leg and update curb ramps with
 10 Thompson Ave. DWS.

 N. Forest Ave. (W. Lafayette
 11 Replace sidewalk panels and enforce sidewalk obstruction code.
 St. to W. Maple St.)

 W. Lafayette St. and N. Mock Install marked crosswalk on north leg and add curb ramps on
 12 Ave. northwest and northeast corners.

 W. Lafayette St. and N. Saint Install marked crosswalk; update curb ramp on southwest corner
 13 Charles Ave. with DWS; install curb extension on southeast corner.

 W. Lafayette St. and N. Install raised crosswalks on north and west legs of intersection;
 14 reconstruct northwest curb to reduce radius; add crosswalk lighting to
 Highland Ave. RRFB.
 E. Lafayette St. and N. College Reconstruct curb ramps at all four corners to improve ADA;
 15 Ave. install LPI; implement No-Right-on-Red.
 Relocate westbound school speed zone sign closer to N. College
 E. Lafayette St. (Highland Ave; install crosswalk markings at commercial driveways; install
 16 Ave. to N. Washington Ave.)
 bicycle lane markings at Auto Zone driveway; install "Bike Lane
 Ends" sign for westbound travel. Reconstruct sidewalk as a
 sidepath per the City's Master Trails Plan.
 N. Saint Charles Ave. and W. Explore options for marked crosswalk and curb extensions at
 17 Boles St. south leg.
 N. Saint Charles Ave. and W. Install marked crosswalks at west and south legs; relocate stop
 18 Watson St. sign and add stop bar for eastbound Watson St.
 Washington Elementary
 19 Install sidewalk to connect to main entrance without using stairs.
 School Property


97 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.18 Washington Elementary School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 98
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Washington Elementary School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Walking School Bus

 Walk to School Day

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Bike Club


99 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Providing
 accessible paved
 connections to school
 entrances and slowing
  speeds around campus
  can improve pedestrian
 safety at Washington
 Elementary.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 100
 John L. Colbert Middle School
Number of Students 460 this close, JLC can take full advantage
 by facilitating bike programming (e.g.,
Grades 5-6 clubs, field trips, events, etc.) and
 possibly even developing an on-campus
Percent within 1 mile
 8% skills park or trail connection to the park.
of School
 The school maintains a bike fleet for use
Percent Walking and Bicycling 6%
 during PE, with several opportunities
Percent on Free and for off-campus bike rides at the nearby
 66% Dinsmore Trail and Fayetteville Traverse.
Reduced Lunch
 Nearly 200 students participate in
Non-Motorist Crashes within groups rides, with sixth grade students
 0
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 participating in a field trip at Lake
 Fayetteville once a year.
John L Colbert (JLC) Middle School is
located across the street from the Rupple
Road Sidepath, connecting the School
to several residential neighborhoods 4% (30) 3% (26)
and the City’s wider sidewalk network. 3% (26)
Rupple Road is a four-lane street 35% (265)
that experiences high vehicle speeds.
Crosswalks along Rupple Road are
placed far apart and would benefit
from an increased presence of crossing
guards, given the speed and separation
of crossing distances; a new mid-block
crossing is highly recommended in this
area as well.

JLC is ideally situated near two high- 52% (398)
quality mountain bike destinations: just 2% (15)
a quarter-mile from Centennial Park,
which offers 18 miles of trails, and a half- Walk Bike Scooter

mile from Kessler Mountain Regional Bus Carpool Car Other

Park, boasting over 20 miles of trails.
 FIGURE 7.10 Distribution of travel modes at
With world-class outdoor recreation John L. Colbert Middle School


101 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.19 John L. Colbert Middle School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 102
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation




 1 W. Bronco Dr. Fill sidewalk gap just west of Bronco Dr. and Rupple Rd.




 NE Corner to John L. Colbert Plan for future paved connections to the upcoming
 2 Middle School Property development and trails on the north/northeast side of campus.




 East side of John L. Colbert Plan for future connectivity to Fayetteville Traverse and
 3 Middle School Property Dinsmore Trail.




 W. Santa Fe St. and S. Rupple
 4 Repair cracking concrete on shared use trail.
 Rd.




 S. Rupple Rd. and W.
 5 Install RRFB.
 Eisenhower Pl.




 Southeast of John L. Colbert Consider trail connection to Magnolia Crossing subdivision
 6 Middle School Property along property line.




 Magnolia Crossing
 7 Subdivision
 Construct shared use path in overhead electric easement.




 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation


 Wave 24 Front Replace rack

  Custom
 6 Front Replace rack
 Weld


103 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.20 John L. Colbert Middle School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 104
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for John L. Colbert Middle School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.



 Bike Bus

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Walk and Bike Escorts

 Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Expand Walk & Roll Events

 Expand Field Trips

 Bike Club

105 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 An
 overhead
  electric easement
 near JLC could
connect a neighboring
 subdivision to
 campus.




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 106
 Holt Middle School
Number of Students 490

Grades 5-6
Percent within 1 mile
 15%
of School
Percent Walking and Bicycling 12%
Percent on Free and
 51%
Reduced Lunch
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 2
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)

Holt Middle School is known for its
vibrant walking and cycling culture,
strongly supported by school leadership
and staff. The school is located on Rupple IMAGE 7.6 Bike racks are over capacity with
Road, a two-lane street that cuts through high rates of walking and cycling at Holt
several neighborhoods as a regional link.
The Rupple Road Sidepath also runs < 1% (4) 6% (53)
directly in front of the school, carrying 6% (52)
 38% (322)
many students who walk and bike from
neighborhoods north and east of campus.

Pick-up and drop-off procedures are very
organized, with walkers and bike riders
released at the same time to encourage
grouping for safer travel. Bike education
is taught for four to six weeks in PE.
A well-designed bike course exists
on campus; however, because it was
privately funded, it has not yet been fully 46% (383)
 3% (24)
integrated into public ownership or long-
term maintenance programs. The school Walk Bike Scooter
hosts two bike events each year–a Roll-
 Bus Carpool Car Other
A-Thon and a Bike to School Day–with
about a hundred students participating in FIGURE 7.11 Distribution of travel modes at
both. Holt Middle School


107 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.21 Holt Middle School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 108
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation



 N. Rupple Rd. and W.
 1 Add high-visibility crosswalk on east leg of intersection.
 McLaren Dr.




 N. Rupple Rd. (W. Clearwood Remove continuous center-turn-lane and implement traffic-
 2 Dr. to W. Edgewater Dr.) calming measures, such as chicanes and speed cushions.




 W. Clearwood Dr. and N.
 3 Install crosswalk on east leg of intersection.
 Rupple Rd.




 4 Holt Middle School Property Consider multiuse path/trail connection at northwest corner.




 N. Rupple Rd. and School Install DWS at southwest curb ramp; install raised crosswalk at
 5 Entrance RRFB.




 N. Rupple Rd. (W. Clearwood Add speed feedback sign in northbound direction. Evaluate
 6 Dr. to W. Mount Comfort Rd.) traffic-calming treatments and reduce speed limit.



 Install curb extension to northwest corner; reconstruct side-
 W. Mount Comfort Rd. and N. walk to trail on northwest corner; add "No-Right-on-Red"
 7 Rupple Rd. across trail crossing; install raised crossing in right-turn
 bypass lane.


 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation


 Add capacity to rear; add
 Schoolyard 30 Rear
 visitor rack to front




109 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.22 Holt Middle School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 110
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Holt Middle School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Walk to School Day

 Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway


 Expand Walk and Bike Escorts


 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education


 Expand Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Bike Club



111 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 The
 Rupple Road
 Sidepath helps
 students walk, roll
 and bike to Holt
 Middle School
 year-round.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 112
 McNair Middle School
Number of Students 666

Grades 5-6

Percent within 1 mile
 12%
of School

Percent Walking and Bicycling 6%

Percent on Free and
 23%
Reduced Lunch IMAGE 7.7 High speeds and long crossings near
 McNair create dangerous conditions for students
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 3
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023) Vandergriff Drive to learn road safety.
 Students practice mountainbiking on a
McNair Middle School is adjacent to
 rudimentary dirt track around the soccer
Vandergriff Elementary School, accessed
 field, but the School does not utilize the
by Vandergriff Drive either from
 wooded soft-surface trail network because
Township Street to the north or Mission
 it is often confusing and lacks wayfinding.
Boulevard to the south. At each day’s
dismissal, nearly 100 students walk toward 6% (34)
 1% (6)
vehicles or buses along the north side of 38% (212)
campus. About 30 students cross at the
RRFB on Mission Boulevard, where two
teachers are typically stationed as crossing
guards. This crossing is dangerous due
to high speeds, motor vehicles failing to
yield to pedestrians, and limited sight
lines due to the hill. A few students live
southwest of McNair, requiring them to
cross Crossover Road. This crossing is
especially dangerous due to long crossing
distances, drivers who fail to yield during 50% (275)
right-on-red turns, and high speeds. In 5% (25)
one incident, law enforcement was called
 Walk Bike Scooter
for a welfare check when a student was
observed crossing this intersection. Bicycle Bus Carpool Car Other
education is taught for two to three weeks FIGURE 7.12 Distribution of travel modes at
in PE, where students are taken onto McNair Middle School


113 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.23 McNair Middle School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 114
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 Install curb ramps in median and convert into pedestrian
 E. Township St. and N.
 1 Vandergriff Dr.
 refuge along north leg of intersection; add lighting; install a
 raised crosswalk on the east leg of intersection.

 N. Vandergriff Dr. and School
 2 Upgrade curb ramps to ADA standards.
 Entrance

 Reconstruct southwest corner to close north-facing curb ramp;
 install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg; add curb ramp at
 N. Starr Dr. and E. Mission southeast corner for south leg of the crosswalk; adjust signal for
 3 Blvd. northbound traffic to No Right Turn during pedestrian phase;
 add time to pedestrian phase; install stop bar in northbound
 travel lane.

 Install PHB; upgrade curb ramp at northwest corner; re-stripe
 E. Mission Blvd. and N. high-visibility crosswalk at north leg; install rumble bars to
 4 Vandergriff Dr. alert east and westbound vehicles on Mission;
 install pedestrian-scale lighting.

 N. Box Ave. and E. Mission Install high-visibility crosswalk and stop bar at north leg of intersec-
 5 Blvd. tion; install “Yield to Pedestrians” signage along Mission Blvd.
 Geometry and accessibility issues support intersection
 reconstruction (reducing curb radii and the 30' westbound and
 N. Crossover Rd. and E. eastbound lane widths). In the near term, upgrade all curb
 6 Mission Blvd. ramps; add mountable truck aprons at all four corners; narrow
 through and turn lanes as appropriate; adjust signalization to
 add LPI and additional time for pedestrian phase.
 N. Hunters Rdg. and N.
 7 Upgrade curb ramps with DWS.
 Pointer Ln.

 N. Hunters Rdg. and E. Install new curb ramp at southeast corner; upgrade curb ramp
 8 Cherokee Dr. at northeast corner with DWS.

 E. Mission Blvd. (N. Box Ave.
 9 to N. Vandergriff Dr.)
 Install sidepath per the City's Master Trails Plan.

 N. Hunter's Ridge (N. Pointer
 10 Ln. to E. Mission Blvd.)
 Install sidewalk.

 N. Whippoorwill Ct. and Install mini-roundabout or four-way stop. A good candidate
 11 Cherokee Dr. for a tactical urbanism project.


 Existing Bike Parking
 Types Total Spaces Locations Recommendation

 Reposition to accommodate
 Schoolyard 20 Front
 all spaces
 Reposition to accommodate
 Schoolyard 20 Rear
 all spaces

115 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.24 McNair Middle School Infrastructure Recommendations




 9


 10




 11




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 116
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for McNair Middle School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.


 Bike Bus

 Expand Bike Education

 Walk to School Day

 Bike to School Day

 Expand Crossing Guards

 Bike Rodeo

 Safe Routes to School Giveaway

 Expand Walk and Bike Escorts

 Expand Park & Walk

 Arrival and Dismissal Education

 Walk & Roll Events

 Field Trips

 Bike Club

117 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 High Speeds
  along E. Mission
 Boulevard present
safety challenges for
students walking and
  rolling at McNair.


 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 118
 Ramay Junior High School
Number of Students 753 improvements along these corridors
 can help provide safer routes to Ramay,
Grades 7-8 such as filling sidewalk gaps, improving
 pedestrian crossings, and installing a
Percent within 1 mile 12-foot shared use path along M.L.K.
 2%
of School
 Jr. Boulevard. Improvements along
Percent on Free and Mitchell Street specifically may provide a
 59%
Reduced Lunch lower-traffic alternative for students who
 use M.L.K. to walk to FHS. Similarly,
Non-Motorist Crashes within
 1 access to the South Loop and Tsa-La-Gi
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 Trails south of campus can be improved
Ramay Junior High School is currently with safer crossings near Sang Avenue,
located near the I-49 interchange at Hollywood Avenue, and M.L.K. Jr.
M.L.K. Jr. Boulevard. At the time of Boulevard. Alternative transportation
this writing, FPS intends to build a options, including transit, should also be
new campus for Ramay near Poplar encouraged.
Street and College Avenue, as part of
the District’s updated feeder pattern.
Pending approval, Ramay will be
renovated into a new magnet high
school.

Students were observed walking to
Ramay from the east on Stone Street
and from the south along Sang Avenue.
After school, students often walk to fast
food restaurants and convenience stores
nearby—either for pick-up or to eat
before a sporting event. Additionally,
hundreds of students walk to
Fayetteville High School along M.L.K. Jr.
Boulevard when the Junior Varsity team
plays on Thursday evenings.

Speeding and distracted driving is often
observed on Sang Avenue and M.L.K. IMAGE 7.8 Connectivity can be strengthened
Jr. Boulevard. Connectivity and safety along the east and south sides of Ramay’s campus


119 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.25 Ramay Junior High School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 120
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 Install DWS on northwest and southwest corners, as well as two
 1 S. Sang Ave. and W. Stone St.
 ramps on southeast corner. Install stop bars in all directions.

 W. Stone St. (S. Cross Ave. to
 2 Fill sidewalk gaps at 1942 and 2026 W. Stone St.
 S. Sang Ave.)

 Install marked crosswalk across Cross Ave. on north leg. Install
 3 W. Stone St. and S. Cross Ave.
 curb ramp on northeast corner.

 S. Sang Ave. (W. Stone St. to Install speed cushions and upgrade sidewalk to
 4 W. M.L.K. Jr. Blvd.) shared use path per city plans.

 S. Sang Ave. and W. Mitchell
 5 Install raised crosswalk and RRFB.
 St.

 W. Mitchell St. (S. Sang Ave to Complete sidewalk gaps at various locations along the north
 6 S. Eastern Ave.) side, extending east to Razorback Rd.

 Address circulation and accessibility issues at numerous
 7 ALLPS Property
 locations across the site.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. and S. Replace crosswalk markings with high-visibility crosswalk
 8 Melbourne Dr. marking, add stop bar, and relocate stop sign behind crosswalk.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. (S.
 9 Key West Dr. to S. Root Ave.)
 Address uplift and drop-off at inlet.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. and
 10 Root Ave.
 Install marked crosswalk and DWS on both curb ramps.

 Install curb extension and raised crosswalk from ALLPS
 W. Old Farmington Rd. and
 11 entrance to sidewalk on south side. Evaluate use of RRFB at
 ALLPS Entrance
 this location.
 S. Sang Ave. and W. Old
 12 Farmington Rd.
 Install raised crosswalk on west leg across Old Farmington Rd.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. (S. Install sidewalk on south side (back of 2190 M.L.K Jr. Blvd.)
 13 Root Ave. to S. Sang Ave.) and install speed cushions.

 W. Martin Luther King Jr. High traffic intersection along high injury network; major barrier
 14 Blvd and S. Hollywood Ave. for student travel to restaurants and other frequent destinations.
 Install marked crosswalks; install curb ramps on northwest and
 Hollywood Ave. and W.
 15 northeast corners; complete sidewalk connections across north
 Pasadena Lnk. leg and east leg of intersection.

 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation

  Custom
 18 Front Replace rack
 Weld


121 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.26 Ramay Junior High School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 122
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Ramay Junior High School. Detailed descriptions
are provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.




123 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Sidewalk
 gaps near
 Ramay make it
 diffcult for students
 to walk, roll, or
 bike to school.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 124
 Woodland Junior High School
Number of Students 807 Grant— with plans to install a traffic signal
 at Poplar Street and College. Moreover,
Grades 7-8 FPS plans to construct the new Ramay
 Junior High School campus just east of this
Percent within 1 mile area. If developed, multiple layers of safety
 7%
of School improvements should be applied at the
 crossings that connect both schools.
Percent Walking and Bicycling 1%
 Every day, nearly one hundred students
Percent on Free and walk to the New Life Church parking lot
 32%
Reduced Lunch
 northeast of Green Acres Road and Poplar
Non-Motorist Crashes within Street for pick-up. About 30 to 50 students
 1 electively enroll in PE at this age, but the
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 school does not have a fleet of bikes. A
Woodland Junior High School is currently skills park exists uphill of the school at
located at Poplar Street and Woodland Gregory Park, but is not utilized. There is
Avenue. At the time of this writing, no bike club, but 15 students participate in
FPS intends to build a new campus for NICA.
Woodland near Joyce Boulevard and
 1% (12) 1% (6)
Crossover Road. Pending approval,
Woodland’s current campus will be 24% (224)
renovated into a middle school to support
the District’s updated feeder pattern.
The Midtown Corridor Trail, constructed
in 2024, now connects the Razorback
Greenway from Gregg Street to Woodland
along Woodland Avenue. While Gregg
Street has long been a dangerous
intersection, the City was recently awarded
an SS4A (Safe Streets and Roads for All) 14% (133)
grant to provide safety improvements on 59% (549)
Gregg, including the intersection near the
school. Walk Bike Scooter
 Bus Carpool Car Other
Significant corridor improvements
are already underway along College FIGURE 7.13 Distribution of travel modes at
Avenue—also funded through the SS4A Woodland Junior High School

125 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.27 Woodland Junior High School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 126
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation


 N. Woodland Ave. and W. Install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg; install curb extension
 1 Poplar St. on southeast corner; update southeast ramp with DWS.


 E. Poplar St. at Woodland Install DWS at curb ramps; double-side crosswalk signs; add
 2 Junior High Entrance thermoplastic rumble bars on approaches to crosswalk.


 E. Poplar St. (N. Green Acres Repair sidewalk on north side; install sidewalk where missing;
 3 Rd. to N. Woodland Ave.) install shared use path on south side of Poplar.

 N. Green Acres Rd. and E. Install high-visibility crosswalks at all four legs; install curb
 4 Poplar St. ramps at all corners.

 E. Poplar St. (N. Green Acres Install shared use path on south side and
 5 Rd. to N. College Ave.) sidewalk on north side.


 Reconstruct intersection with safe crossings, considering
 the future Ramay Junior High location just east of this area.
 E. Poplar St. and N. College At-grade improvements should include high-visibility cross-
 6 Ave. walks, LPI, No-Right-on-Red, and protected signal phasing.
 The feasibility of a bike-ped tunnel should also be investigated,
 given the significance of this east-west connection.

 N. Gregg Ave. and W. Poplar Intersection to be reconstructed under SS4A grant; railroad
 7 St. crossing improvements recommended.


 Install curb ramp on southeast corner of intersection; install
 N. Greenvalley Ave. and W.
 8 high-visibility crosswalk on south leg of intersection; update
 Miller St.
 curb ramp on southwest corner of intersection with DWS.

 N. Yates Ave. and W. Miller
 9 St.
 Install marked crosswalk across Yates Ave.

 N. Woodland Ave. (E. Poplar
 10 Install curb ramps on driveway (2).
 St. to E. Ash St.)

 N. Green Acres Rd. (E. Poplar Install crosswalks across commercial driveways; reduce
 11 St. to N. College Ave.) driveway widths where feasible.


 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation

 Relocate away from
 Schoolyard 10 Front
 travel-way; add capacity



127 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.28 Woodland Junior High School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 128
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for Woodland Junior High School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.




129 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 High-
 visibility
  crosswalks and
  upgraded curb
ramps can improve
 connectivity and
 safety around
 Woodland.


 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 130
 ALLPS School of Innovation
Number of Students 153

Grades 9 - 12

Percent within 1 mile 4%
of School
Percent on Free and 21%
Reduced Lunch

Non-Motorist Crashes
within 1/4 Mile 3
Radius (2019-2023)

As a preparation services center,
students who attend ALLPS come
and go during all parts of the day.
Additionally, many students take
 IMAGE 7.9 This bike rack style does not support
online courses remotely from home.
 bicycles properly. Replacement is recommended.
While many students drive or ride the
bus (including Razorback Transit),
some walk or ride from nearby
residential developments.

The site is in an older residential
area with frequent sidewalk
gaps, unimproved crossings, and
accessibility issues. Providing ADA
access across the school property,
establishing an appropriate bike
parking area near the entrance, and
improving transit access would all
greatly improve the site.
 IMAGE 7.10 Incomplete sidewalks and long crossings
 create inaccessible conditions for students at ALLPS


131 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.29 ALLPS School of Innovation Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 132
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 Install DWS on northwest and southwest corners, as well as two
 1 S. Sang Ave. and W. Stone St.
 ramps on southeast corner. Install stop bars in all directions.

 W. Stone St. (S. Cross Ave. to
 2 Fill sidewalk gaps at 1942 and 2026 W. Stone St.
 S. Sang Ave.)

 Install marked crosswalk across Cross Ave. on north leg. Install
 3 W. Stone St. and S. Cross Ave.
 curb ramp on northeast corner.

 S. Sang Ave. (W. Stone St. to Install speed cushions and upgrade sidewalk to shared use
 4 W. M.L.K. Jr. Blvd.) path per city plans.

 S. Sang Ave. and W. Mitchell
 5 Install raised crosswalk and RRFB.
 St.

 W. Mitchell St. (S. Sang Ave to
 6 Complete sidewalk gaps at various locations along the north side.
 S. Eastern Ave.)

 Address circulation and accessibility issues at numerous
 7 ALLPS Property
 locations across the site.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. and S. Replace crosswalk markings with high-visibility crosswalk
 8 Melbourne Dr. marking, add stop bar, and relocate stop sign behind crosswalk.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. (S.
 9 Key West Dr. to S. Root Ave.)
 Address uplift and drop-off at inlet.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. and
 10 Root Ave.
 Install marked crosswalk and DWS on both curb ramps.

 Install curb extension and raised crosswalk from ALLPS
 W. Old Farmington Rd. and
 11 entrance to sidewalk on south side. Evaluate use of RRFB at
 ALLPS Entrance
 this location.
 S. Sang Ave. and W. Old
 12 Farmington Rd.
 Install raised crosswalk on west leg across Old Farmington Rd.

 W. Old Farmington Rd. (S. Install sidewalk on south side (back of 2190 M.L.K Jr. Blvd.)
 13 Root Ave. to S. Sang Ave.) and install speed cushions.

 W. Martin Luther King Jr. High traffic intersection along high injury network; major barrier
 14 Blvd and S. Hollywood Ave. for student travel to restaurants and other frequent destinations.
 Install marked crosswalks; install curb ramps on northwest and
 Hollywood Ave. and W.
 15 Pasadena Lnk.
 northeast corners; complete sidewalk connections across north
 leg and east leg of intersection.

 Existing Bike Parking
 Type Total Spaces Location Recommendation

  Custom
 6 Side Replace rack; relocate to front
 Weld


133 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.30 ALLPS School of Innovation Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 134
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed below
are the recommendations for the ALLPS School of Innovation. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.




135 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Providing
 adequate bike
 parking at the front
 entrance could be
 a quick win for
 ALLPS.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 136
 Fayetteville High School
Number of Students 2534

Grades 9 - 12

Percent within 1 mile
 1%
of School
Percent on Free and
 36%
Reduced Lunch

Non-Motorist Crashes within
 6
1/4 Mile Radius (2019-2023)
 IMAGE 7.11 Students walk in the grass from the
 parking lot to the sidewalk on Stadium Drive
Fayetteville Public Schools serves a
118-square-mile district with a single Enhancing these pedestrian routes,
high school campus (FHS), meaning improving transit access, parking pricing,
only about 1% of students live within and other policies can reduce single-
walking or cycling distance of FHS. occupancy vehicle trips.
While this limits the overall mode share
for active transportation at the high In addition to infrastructure, education
school, the centralized model creates an plays a key role. Observations of distracted
opportunity to focus Safe Routes to School driving and walking enforce the need for
improvements on key corridors and access targeted safety education, which could be
points near campus. incorporated into advisory periods.

FHS is located in an urbanized area near
the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Public Library, commercial districts, and Existing Bike Parking
shared use trails. However, Arkansas
Highway 180 (M.L.K. Jr. Boulevard)—a Types U-rack U-rack
five-lane, high-speed corridor—forms a
 Total Spaces 64 34
major barrier to safe walking and cycling.
Strengthening east–west connections, such
as Mitchell Street and Carlson Drive, can Locations Front Rear
provide lower-stress alternatives to M.L.K.
Jr. Boulevard, especially with the planned
 Recommendation None
redevelopment of the former Ramay
Junior High site into a magnet campus.

137 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.31 Fayetteville High School Walkshed




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 138
  Infrastructure Recommendations
  Map ID Location Recommendation

 S. Stadium Dr. and W.
 1 Bulldog Blvd. Install raised crosswalk across Stadium Dr.

 W. Bulldog Blvd. (Delaware North side sidewalk needs repair. Missing sidewalk on north
 2 Ave. to Buchanan Ave.) side, west of parking lot to Delaware Ave.
 Add raised crosswalk; double-side crosswalk signs.
 Bulldog Blvd. and FHS North
 3 Combination of missing curb ramps and temporary speed
 Entrance humps could be replaced by raised crosswalk.
 W. Stone St. (Buchanan Ave. Repair three ADA issues where sidewalks intersect driveways
 4 to Duncan Ave.) between Buchanan Ave. and Duncan Ave.
 Add marked crossing across Duncan Ave. (north), as well as east
 W. Stone St. and S. Duncan
 5 and west crosswalks across Stone St; add curb ramp to southeast
 Ave. corner.
 Install high-visibility crosswalks at the north and west legs of
 6 S. Hill Ave. and W. Stone St. the intersection.

 S. Stadium Dr. (Carlson Dr. to
 7 M.L.K. Jr. Blvd.) Install speed cushions.

 S. Stadium Dr. and W. Carlson Add high-visibility crossing across Carlson Dr. (west side);
 8 Dr. install raised crossing across Stadium Dr.

 S. Buchanan Ave. and School
 9 Entrance Install RRFB; upgrade curb ramp on east side of Buchanan.

 Create safe crossing or separate pathway/ramp down to
 10 FHS southwest Driveway Stadium Dr. for students walking by installing parking lot
 crossings, walking lane, ramp down to sidewalk, etc.
 W. M.L.K. Jr. Blvd. (S. Stripe crosswalks across driveways and relocate
 11 Razorback Rd. to College/ signage as needed.
 School Ave.)
 S. Buchanan Ave. and S. Redesign intersection and review access closure for Duncan
 12 Duncan Ave. Ave.

 Implement LPI; increase pedestrian signal phase; prohibit
 13 W. 6th St. and S. Stadium Dr. Right-on-Red at all approaches.
 Improvement needed; since the street is one-way, consider
 S. Duncan Ave. (S. Duncan
 14 installing traffic delineators to restrict the width and reduce
 Ave. to M.L.K Jr. Blvd.) crossing distances on the north leg of the intersection.
 Pursue city ownership of this State-owned corridor, install
 W. M.L.K. Jr. Blvd. (Stadium
 15 Dr. to Hill Ave.) medians, and other safety measures to encourage safe vehicle
 speeds.
 Improvement needed at this intersection. Since the street is one-
 W. M.L.K. Jr. Blvd. and S.
 16 way, consider installing traffic delineators to restrict the width
 Duncan Ave. and reduce crossing distances on the north leg of the intersection.

 Increase sidewalk width on east side of Stadium; add sidewalk
 S. Stadium Dr. (M.L.K. Jr.
 17 to the west side between M.L.K. Jr. Blvd. and Tsa-La-Gi Trail.
 Blvd. to Tsa-La-Gi Trail) Bridge may pose as a constraint.

 W. Indian Trl. and S. Rose Install pedestrian connection to trail from neighborhood to the
 18 Ave. south.


139 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MAP 7.32 Fayetteville High School Infrastructure Recommendations




 CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 140
Program Recommendations
Safe Routes to School Program Recommendations seek to build upon the engineering
interventions and current practices at each school, cultivating a culture of safety that
encourages, educates, and inspires lifelong habits for active transportation. Listed
below are the recommendations for Fayetteville High School. Detailed descriptions are
provided at the end of this report in the Appendix A: Program Recommendations.




141 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Pedestrian
 access along
 Stone Street can be
 improved with ADA-
 compliant sidewalks
 and high-visibility
 crosswalks.




CAMPUS ASSESSMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | 142
 8
 Appen




143
ndices




 | 144
Appendix A:
Program Recommendations
This "Strategies Guide" provides practical strategies and resources to encourage and
enable more families to walk, bicycle, and/or roll safely and comfortably. The activities
detailed in this Guide meet a variety of the Fayetteville SRTS Six Es, but focus primarily on
Encouragement, Education, and Enforcement. They can be tailored to meet the needs of a
specific school or community. Many ideas covered in this guide include information about

 Audience TABLE A.1 Progra

 Recommendations


 Elementary Middle Junior High
 Programming Idea School School School High School Caregivers


 Establish SRTS Team
 • • • • •
 Park & Walk
 • • • • •
 Walk & Roll Events
 • • • •
Encouragement
 Walking School Bus
 • •
 Bike Bus
 • •
 Frequent Walker and
 Biker Program • • • •
 Driver's Education
 •
Education
 Pedestrian and Cycling
 Education • • • •
 Parent, Caregiver and
 Staff Education •
 Crossing Guards
 • • • • •
Enforcement
 Student Walk Audit
 • • • •
 School Zone Traffic
 Enforcement • • • • •
 Audience

 ES MS JH HS K12 C CW
 Elementary Middle Junior High All Caregivers Community
 School School High School Grades Wide

145 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 the activity, the goal of the activity, materials needed, appropriate age groups, volunteer
 time needed, suggested locations, and resources and templates to help you get started.
 Icons were used to streamline the ideas, so that community SRTS champions can
 efficiently identify what may work in their specific school and for their situation. But this
 is not an exhaustive list, so this guide also includes links to other resources and ideas.
 There are vast options to approach SRTS. If your community has a seemingly unique
 experience, there may be a documented solution and strategy for encouraging walking,
 cycling, and rolling.

am
 Focus
s


 Walking or
 Rolling Bicycling Driving Busing Effort Page


 • • • • High 147


 • • Medium 150


 • • • • Medium 151


 • Medium 153


 • Medium 155


 • • Low 158


 • Low 160


 • • High 160


 • • • • Low 160


 • • • Medium 163


 • • • • Low 163


 • • • • Medium 165



 Focus Effort



 All Walking/ Bicycling Driving Busing Low Medium High
 Modes Rolling

 APPENDICES | 146
Establish an SRTS Team K12 C CW
District-level Recommendation
 Activity Goal
 An SRTS Team can help meet the following goal:
 • Serve as a sounding board during the planning process, provide feedback
 and knowledge at key stages, and work together to implement the Plan
 and Program at a school or cluster of schools.


Expectations of SRTS Material Needs
Team Members • N/A
  • Promote SRTS events and activities
 (Walk & Roll to School Day; Bike Implementation
 Rodeo; Bike to School Day; etc.) • Identify team members and local
  • Participate in school safety audits partners that would be part of the
  • Implement the SRTS Plan SRTS Team. Members of the Team
  • Provide additional resources and should include key stakeholders
 support where needed to best from the school and community
 implement safe and effective school who can help plan and implement a
 travel options successful program. Members could
Description include local champions, principals,

The SRTS Team helps guide the City's
SRTS Program by providing feedback,
advice, and knowledge gained through
professional expertise or lived experience.
The Team should be composed of up to 20
volunteer members representing interests
including, but not limited to: government
staff, bicycle and pedestrian advocacy
organization, Safe Routes to School
practitioners, school district staff, public
health and safety representatives.

Activity Lead
City, School District, parents, students,
advocates IMAGE A.1 Bike education at Holcomb Elementary


147 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 teachers, district transportation students and families throughout the
 staff, municipal employees, elected school district. The goal is to keep the
 officials, public health professionals, momentum of the program moving
 parents, students, general community forward and to foster a supportive
 members, bike advocates and walking and cycling culture.
 law enforcement and should • The SRTS Team should assign lead
 represent diverse geographic areas, roles and set up regular check-ins
 perspectives, backgrounds, and to evaluate progress of the Plan and
 experiences. Program.
  • Determine how each team member • Have local City Council and School
 will contribute to implementation of Board pass resolutions adopting the
 the SRTS Program and Plan. SRTS Team as a formal committee of
Once the SRTS Team is identified, it the City and one that is referred to
is recommended that the Team holds in questions of transportation safety
an initial planning meeting to identify and access, school siting and adjacent
priority strategies and actions from development, and other relevant
the SRTS Plan and for the future years needs.
of the SRTS Program. The Team can
identify current SRTS efforts, barriers, Youth Task Force/High School
opportunities, and needs and reach out Student Leadership
to stakeholders to better understand Developing a Youth Task Force with
the needs, desires, and context of high school student representatives
 who care about transportation, climate
 change, and/or health is a great way to
 establish young local leaders and bring
 youth voices to the active transportation
 conversation. Student task force members
 plan events and activities to encourage
 walking and cycling.

 Establish a Youth Task Force at the high
 school to include students representing
 diverse experiences, backgrounds,
 and geographies. Provide the Youth
 Task Force with at least one seat on the
 Fayetteville SRTS Team.



 APPENDICES | 148
Encouragement TABLE A.2 Encouragement
 Recommendations

Outside of big "Walk & Roll" events, Bike Buses, and Walking School Buses, a school
or community-incentivized walking or bicycling program can help encourage more
students to walk or bike to school. Audiences are typically families with all ages of
students considered, depending on the site/location.


 Recommendation Description Lead Implementer(s)

 Walk and Bike to School Days
 encourage students and their families
 to try walking, bicycling, and rolling
 Participate in Walk to in a supportive environment. Consider
 School Day and Bike incorporating competitions between School District
 to School Day schools district wide. Once established,
 they can lead to monthly walking,
 cycling, and rolling events to maintain
 momentum and enthusiasm.


 Walking school buses and bike buses
 Encourage and are groups of children who walk or
 support walking and bicycle to school together with adult
 City, School District
 school buses and bike supervision. Organize adult volunteers
 buses to "pick up" students on their walk or
 bike ride to and from school.


 Walking, cycling, and/or rolling are
  Frequent Walker/Bike
 encouraged with punch cards or similar School(s)
 Program
 options


 Schools can partner with other
 community organizations to acquire
 Give away bicycle and fit the helmets for students who
 helmets, lights, and do not have them. Coordinate helmet, City, School District
 locks light, and lock giveaways with bike
 and helmet safety education and skills
 practice.


 Improve awareness of SRTS efforts and
 Share success stories build excitement by sharing success City, School District
 stories via local and social media.




149 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Park & Walk K12 C
 Activity Goals
 • Establish remote pick-up /drop-off location to encourage walking/
 cycling/rolling as part of the trip to/from school
 • Relieve congestion around the school drop-off and pick-up area and
 possibly improve access for pedestrians
 • Establish safe gathering places for students to meet to walk together to/
 from school

Materials Needed should walk with elementary students, with
 time frames that note when it is appropriate
Coordinate with a local park, grocery
 to park and walk.
store, commercial space, church, or other
community organization to utilize their
parking lot. Be sure the Park & Walk does
 Access for All
not interfere with business hours. Create The following should be considered and
signs, flyers, or posters to advertise and implemented, if appropriate, to ensure
provide wayfinding to people using the equitable access:
Park & Walk Site. • Provide materials in languages spoken
 by students and caregivers. Consider
Implementation visual maps and materials that are
Similar steps can be taken to implement easily understood and accessible.
a Park & Walk program. Determine a • Ensure that the walking school bus
nearby spot to the school for students route is accessible to students of
and families to park and practice all abilities. If not, communicate
pedestrian or bicycle safety by walking the barriers in any materials. For
or rolling to school. These programs are example, walking school bus maps
great for younger students who need should highlight sidewalks or curbs
more assistance walking or cycling to that are not ADA accessible.
school and for older students for a little • Look to create walking school bus
more independence. These programs routes that originate from or include
help improve safety, parent trust, and locations with multi-family housing.
visibility. Park & Walk sites also relieve
congestion at school drop-off zones and Other Resources and Examples
eliminate some idling and waiting. • Step by Step: How to Start a Walking
 School Bus at Your School (Safe
Test timing and routes from Park & Walk
 Routes National Partnership)
sites to school. Make sure road crossings
 • The Walking School Bus: Combining
are safe and that there are facilities for safe
 Safety, Fun, and the Walk to School
access. Consider signage denoting parents
 (SRTS Guide)

 APPENDICES | 150
Walk & Roll Events K12

 Activity Goals
 • Encouraging families who do not typically walk, bike, or roll to school to
 try doing so
 • Encouraging students to walk, bike, or roll to school together in groups
 • Uniting the entire school/community for one activity
 • Reducing transportation-related emissions and improved air quality
 around the school by reducing morning traffic congestion
 • Jump starting an SRTS program at a school or in the community
 • Build the culture of walking or bicycling to school, and acceptance of
 walking or bicycling to school that is supported by the City and school


Examples:
Walk & Roll events help generate "Roll-a-Thon" and Bike to School Day at
enthusiasm and excitement around schools like Holt Middle School.
walking, cycling, and rolling. • Ruby Bridges Day - Every November
Programming examples include: 14th, Ruby Bridges's courageous
 • Walk & Roll to School Day - Every and historic act of walking to school
 October, schools across Arkansas, as the first Black child to attend the
 the country, and the world celebrate formerly whites-only William Frantz
 International Walk & Roll to School Elementary School in Louisiana in
 Day (IWR2SD). The celebration is 1960. This day is celebrated across the
 designed to encourage students, United States and encourages students
 families, and school communities to to walk to school, engage in a day of
 walk, bike, and roll to school. An event dialogue, and learn about activism,
 like this can share the same excitement anti-racism, and anti-bullying.
 and celebration at other school events • Winter Walk & Roll to School Day -
 like Donuts with Grownups. Pick a day in January or February that
 • Bike to School Day - Bike to School encourages walking and cycling/rolling
 Day (BTSD) is an annual one-day event in winter. This also promotes winter
 held in May, which is National Bike walk/roll safety when conditions are
 Month, and serves to promote bicycling different, but some students must still
 as a fun, healthy, and safe way to get walk or roll to school.
 around. An event like this can share
 the same excitement and celebration Activity Lead
 as other school events like Spring School administration or transportation
 Fling Carnival. Build on the success of coordinator, caregiver

151 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Material Needs • Remind your community via
 newsletters/website, banners, posters,
 • Balloons, bubbles, other fun elements
 or flyers.
 to build excitement
 • Confirm location and any material
 • Celebratory chalk messages on
 needs (e.g., tables, speakers, etc.) with
 sidewalks near school
 school staff.
 • Family friendly music
 • Welcome music The day of the event:
 • Event flyers • Show up early to welcome volunteers
 • Encouragement items (e.g., stickers, and get the event set up.
 pencils, etc.) • Create a festive environment with
 music, decorations, sidewalk chalk, etc.
Implementation During and after the event, it is important to:
Successful implementation of big, one-
 • Hand out giveaways to students.
day events rests on the event timeline.
 • Take pictures and post to social media!
Suggested event timelines are provided
 Remember to be respectful of school
in many Bike to School Day and
 photo policies.
International Walk & Roll to School Day
toolkits. A general timeline to follow Access for All
might include:
 The following should be considered and
One month before the event:
 implemented, if appropriate, to ensure
 • Form a committee to help plan the equitable access:
 event.
 • Provide materials in languages spoken
 • Check with school officials about
 by students and caregivers.
 holding the event, confirm the date/
 • Ensure that the event does not block
 time.
 drop-off/pick-up locations for students
 • Post about the event in the school
 that may need ADA access to the school.
 newsletter and social media.
 • Ensure that students who live too
 • Start recruiting volunteers using the
 far away or cannot walk, bike, or roll
 school newsletter, social media, and
 to school can still participate in the
 word of mouth.
 activities by having on-site or in-class
A week or two before the event: activities (e.g., pedestrian safety
 • Continue to recruit and communicate lessons, bike helmet fitting).
 with volunteers.
 • Routinely post about the event on Other Resources and Examples
 social media. • KDOT Bike to School Day Kit
 • Invite City and school officials to come • How to Plan Walk/Bike to School Day
 to the event. • Ruby Bridges Walk to School Day
 • Map out and/or confirm any Walking • Walk/Bike to School Downloadable
 School Bus or Bike Train routes. Materials

 APPENDICES | 152
Walking School Bus ES MS

 Activity Goals
 • Reducing safety concerns by providing adult supervision while students
 walk to school
 • Creating community with neighborhoods and a culture of walking and
 rolling
 • Encouraging more students to walk to school
 • Reduce vehicle congestion around the school at arrival and dismissal

Description
A walking school bus is a group of small group of families. Pick a single
children that walk to school with one or neighborhood that has a group of parents
more adults. While the number of families and children who are interested.
and students involved in a walking school
 To start an informal walking school bus:
bus may vary, a key characteristic is a
designated route, specific "stops" along • Invite families who live within
the route where additional students or walking distance.
families can join at set times, and adult • Exchange contact information with
supervision. caregivers of students that would like
 to participate.
Activity Lead • Designate adult supervisors to
School's Parent Teacher Organization specific dates.
leaders, caregivers, school champion • Pick a route, meeting spots, and times
 to meet. Take a test walk to calibrate
Material Needs timing. Consider traffic patterns.
  • Safety vests or other identifiable and • Decide how often the group will walk
 together.
 safety clothing
 ○ Some groups are once a week
  • Yard signs along the walking route
 while others are monthly or even
  • Printer or online map of the walking
 daily.
 route with stops identified (if meeting
 at specific stops) When picking a route, answer the
  • Flyers/promotional materials following questions:
 • Are there adequate walking facilities?
Implementation Are there sidewalks or paths? Or if
When beginning a walking school bus, there are no sidewalks or paths, are
it often makes sense to start with a the streets low-speed and allow or

153 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 safe walking? Are there accessible leader should walk the route without
 ramps at corners for students with students first to evaluate it for safety
 varying abilities? concerns or issues.
  • Is it easy to cross the street? Is there a 3. Identify adults to supervise
 route that includes marked crossings, walkers. One adult for every six
 signals, or crossing guards? students is recommended, although
  • Does the environment feel safe? Are if students are aged ten or older,
 fewer adults may be needed. If
 there loose dogs? Is there adequate
 students are between ages four to
 visibility?
 six, one adult per three children
To grow a walking school bus or add is recommended. Make sure each
more, the program might require walking school bus leader has a
coordination, volunteers, and potential safety vest or some other high-
safety and liability training. The following visibility designation (e.g., t-shirt,
steps should be followed as a walking bright hat, etc.) that lets students
school bus becomes larger and more and their caregivers know who is in
established: charge.
 4. Finalize the logistics by answering
  1. Determine the amount of interest the following questions:
 in a walking school bus program. ○ How often will the walking school
 Contact potential participants and bus operate? Once a week or every
 partners to inform them about the day?
 program and recruit walking school ○ When should students arrive at
 bus leaders. each stop to be picked up?
 ○ Consider promoting the
 ○ Will the bus operate before school,
 walking school bus within the after school, or both?
 neighborhood you wish to walk. ○ What training do volunteers need?
 ○ Provide written information to
 ○ What safety training do children
 caregivers with expectations and need?
 rules for the walking school bus.
 ○ Consider having both parents/ 5. Finally, kick off the program! Put
 caregivers and children sign off on up yard signs or A-boards at the
 the expectations and rules of the stops that advertise the scheduled
 walking school bus. walking days and times to spread
 the word. Also, consider launching
  2. Next, identify the route(s). The the walking school bus on the day
 amount and location of interested of a community event, such as
 families will influence the number International Walk to School Day or
 and locations of walking routes the first day of school.
 and stops. The walking school bus


 APPENDICES | 154
Bike Bus ES MS

 Activity Goals
 • Encourage more students to bike to school
 • Reduce vehicle congestion around the school at arrival and dismissal
 • Teach students safe bicycling skills
 • Encourage physical activity before the start of the school day

Description
Bike buses, or bike trains, are adult-led • Safety vests (or other identifiable
groups of students that bike to or from clothing), a first aid kit, and a bike
school together. They may consist of one multi-tool for bike bus leaders
or two neighbors cycling together, or a • Yard signs at bike bus stops
route with multiple stations where more • Printed or online map of the route
riders join along the way. Bike buses with stops identified
can be for students of any age, but the • Flyers/promotional materials
age and bicycling skills of the student
should be considered when creating the Implementation
route and determining the number of A bike bus route needs to account for
caregivers needed. At minimum, a bike both rider ability, safe facilities, and
bus should have at least two adults, with distance. Bike bus organizers should
one positioned at the front of the train answer the following questions when
and another in the back to make sure creating a route:
everyone rides together. More adults • Where do students live?
might be needed based on the age, skill, • Is there bicycle infrastructure—such as
and number of students, or the bicycle paths, bike lanes, or bike boulevards—
facilities and traffic along the route. that would increase safety for riders?
 • Where are the best places to cross
Activity Lead streets?
Caregivers, Bike Fayetteville, Pedal it • How long will it take to ride the
Forward route? Remember to factor in breaks
 and slow-downs around designated
Material Needs stops to pick up more riders.
  • Bikes, helmets, and a secure place to • How will the bike bus navigate the
 park their bikes at school school campus? Are there any rules
 or restrictions around riding bikes on
 school property?


155 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
  • What do you do with the bikes at the savings time. Inform caregivers on
 end of the ride? Is there a secure place the bike bus's bike light policy and,
 to lock bikes? if possible, supply bike lights for
  • What rules and expectations will students that either do not have them
 riders have to adhere to? While law or forget.
 does not require a helmet for children, Bike bus participation may change—you
 consider requiring helmets for the may see some students drop off, or there
 bike bus. may be a huge influx in new students
Once the route is determined, it is wanting to join. Some tips for keeping the
recommended that the organizer ride momentum include:
the route without students at the time • Keep it exciting – Bring a Bluetooth
the bike bus would typically operate to speaker for music. Also, consider
identify challenges or issues. The route having fun activities to switch up
can also be amended once the bike bus which students are in the front or the
begins to better accommodate new riders, back of the bus or theme days (e.g.,
safety concerns, or traffic changes. Halloween costume ride). Include
 local heroes or celebrities, or even
Scheduling the bike bus is also
 school staff. Make it a social after
important—a clear schedule and the
 school bike club!
ability to communicate any last-minute
changes is essential. Considerations for • Reward student riders – Special
the schedule might include: stickers, reflective key chains, or other
  • How often will you ride? Daily, one small incentives can go a long way
 day a week, or one day a month (e.g., in encouraging participation and
 first Friday) rewarding safe bicycling behavior.
 ○ When will the bike bus start, • Foster a supportive bike culture –
 arrive, and leave the various stops? Build upon the bike bus's momentum
  • Will the bike bus be one-way or to encourage the greater school
 round trip? community to participate in Bike
  • If roundtrip, how do you handle to School Day or host another bike
 afternoon departure? Consider related event such as a bike rodeo.
 students who participate in after ○ Partner with Pedal It Forward for
 school activities. Determine a location bike giveaways.
 to meet after school, such as nearby
 ○ Partner with local bike shops for
 the bike racks.
 bike rodeo volunteers: Phat Tire,
  • Depending on the time and season,
 High Roller, The Bike Route,
 students may need bike lights.
 Pedego. Work with these local
 Consider laws and ordinances. Keep
 shops to build a bike maintenance
 in mind any changes for daylight

 APPENDICES | 156
 kit for the school district to use for bicycling abilities to join. If that is not
 future bike events. possible, communicate the barriers to
 ○ Partner with Pedal Kids for bike caregivers in any materials.
 camps, workshops and the bike • Identify resources in your community
 rodeo. for free or low-cost bicycles for
 bicycles. Many families have bicycles
 ○ Partner with Ozark Off-Road
 that they have outgrown their
 Cyclists (OORC) for trail
 garages. Starting a bike bus is a great
 riding and bicycle maintenance
 opportunity to organize a bike swap!
 opportunities.
  • Monitor your progress – Regularly Other Resources and Examples
 assess how the program is going • Bicycling to School Together: A Bike
 by asking the students and their Train Planning Guide (National
 families what is and is not working Center for Safe Routes to School)
 well. Consider informal polls or more • Tip Sheet Number 2: Organizing Bike
 formal surveys. Trains (Safe Routes Partnership)
  • Do not burn out – If you feel that the • How to Start a Bike Bus (Bike Bus
 bike bus is getting too large, ask more World)
 caregivers to get involved, or evaluate • Contact FPS Outdoor Education and
 if it makes sense to add another bike Sustainability Specialist for Support
 bus.
  • Consider Bike Bus leader training -
 Formalized training for group riding
 can be available through the League
 of American Bicyclists or talk to other
 Bike Bus leaders and organizers for
 tips about safe group riding and
 considerations with children riders.
Access for All
The following should be considered and
implemented, if appropriate, to ensure
equitable access:
  • Provide materials in languages
 spoken by students and caregivers.
  • Ensure that the bicycling route is
 as free of hazards as possible (e.g., IMAGE A.2 Pedestrians crossing at the RRFB near
 potholes, busy intersections, etc.) Vandergriff Elementary and McNair Middle School
 to allow students with varying

157 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Frequent Walker
 K12
 and Biker Program
 Activity Goals
 • Increase participation
 • Low-cost participation rewards for walking, rolling, and bicycling
 • Improved participation for try-it days

Description Material Needs
Frequent walker and biker programs • Punch cards are optional but can help
provide small rewards or incentives students track active trips
to students who regularly walk and • Incentives for frequent walking,
bicycle to school. Frequent walker and cycling, and rolling students
biker programs use a system, like punch • Marketing materials to promote the
cards, small item collections, or posters event
for tracking student trips. Rewards can
be given by classroom, like the Golden Sharing Successes
Sneaker Award, and can help shift the When various partners in a community—
culture and acceptance of walking or and the public at large—learn about
cycling to school. These programs also SRTS programs that work, other
can instill a sense of pride to getting to organizations may be encouraged to
school on foot or by bike. participate and inspired to support
 similar programs at their own schools.
 SRTS publicity is typically positive
 and shows happy, active children and
 success in implementing infrastructure,
 walking and bicycling programs, and
 education. Often, the successes can be
 shared in simple ways, like with social
 media posts or through earned media
 in local newspapers, on the radio, or
 on televisions. Often, sharing successes
 within a school's community encourages
 others within that same school to
 participate. Today's media opportunities
 allow students and adults to share photos,
 videos, and written content. Be sure to
 have permission to share the faces of
 students on social media.

 APPENDICES | 158
Education TABLE A.3 Education
 Recommendations

Safe Routes to School education is multifaceted in that it should include messaging
around program awareness, safety, and access. Audiences are also varied and may
include students, caregivers, and drivers in general. Delivery of education can also vary
and may include classroom education, lessons, printed materials, digital materials,
signage, events, and more.

 Recommendation Description Lead Implementer(s)


 Students should receive age-appropriate
 pedestrian and bicycle education that is
 Provide pedestrian regularly reinforced (e.g., annually) and
 and bicycle safety provides opportunities for skills practice.
 School District
 education to School-based education works best when
 students integrated into the PE or Health curriculum.
 Outdoor classrooms at either school could be
 used for these educational activities.


 Partnership
 Bike rodeos teach children skills related to
 with the City,
 Conduct a bicycle walking, bicycling, and rolling safely, which can
 School District,
 rodeo increase both student and caregiver’s confidence
 community and
 for walking, bicycling, and rolling to school.
 local businesses


 Prepare and distribute information packets
 for parents, caregivers, and school staff at the
 beginning of the school year containing school
 Conduct parent arrival and dismissal maps, a written description
 and staff safety of the rules and procedures for arrival and School District
  education campaign dismissal, and general safety information.
 Procedures should emphasize driving safely,
 being alert for pedestrians and bicyclists, and
 respecting the school crossing guard(s).


 Walking, bicycling, and rolling route maps can
 Provide walking,
 show the location of pedestrian and bicycle
 bicycling, and City
 infrastructure and estimated walk/bike/roll
 rolling maps
 times.

 Provide Travel Provide a multimodal-specific curriculum for
  Training for middle, middle and high school students with material
 School District
 junior high, and on safe walking, bicycling, rolling, driving, and
  high school students transit behaviors.



159 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Driver's Education (ITE), and local active transportation
 advocacy groups.
For high school students learning to
drive, for parent and local community • Education can be in the form of
drivers, and for bus drivers: ongoing lessons or provided in other
 methods like videos or skills practice.
  • Incorporate content and messaging
 Consider send-home materials as
 in the community and with parent
 well like tip sheets, coloring pages, or
 and student notifications on how
 bookmarks with safety information.
 to drive around pedestrians and
 cyclists, and the outsized impact that • Education can be provided in schools
 certain driving behaviors can have on or during after school programs,
 pedestrian/bike safety (e.g., speed, camps, or community events.
 right turns on red signals, opening • Host a one-time or annual safety
 car doors, etc.). This can improve the event designed to engage and
 culture around active transportation entertain children while providing
 over the long term. safety skills and knowledge.
  • Provide information and messaging Partner with Safety Town NWA for
 about distracted driving, especially pedestrian and bicycle safety. They
 to high school students. Consider provide children with the knowledge and
 no-phone zones and signage in school practical skills they need to stay safe in a
 zones and/or on campuses. variety of situations.

Pedestrian and Cycling Parent, Caregiver and Staff
Education Education
In school, student-focused pedestrian/ • Provide walking and bicycling routes
bike education opportunities: maps that show the location of
  • Students should receive age- pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure
 appropriate pedestrian and bicycle and estimated walk/bike times to
 education that is regularly reinforced students and parents. These safe
 (e.g., annually) and provides routes can be designated as walking
 opportunities for skills practice. routes and/or bicycling routes.
  • SRTS-focused lesson plans can • School zone safety tips should include
 have themes of safety, community, school maps, and written descriptions
 health, and/or environment. Lesson of the rules and procedures for arrival
 plans may be available through Safe and dismissal that emphasize driving
 Routes to School organizations, the safety, being alert for pedestrians and
 Institute of Transportation Engineers bicyclists, and respecting the school
 crossing guard(s).


 APPENDICES | 160
  • Promote safety at the start of the how of integrating bicycle education
 school year (open houses, etc.) and into physical education programs.
 throughout the year. Reminders • Active Transportation Alliance
 can be particularly important with Teacher Resources: A resource kit
 daylight savings time changes that includes quick 10 minute lessons
  • When new students enroll at for us in PE classes, other sample
 schools, provide transportation lessons, and additional resources for
 safety information in new student elementary, middle, and high school
 paperwork and information. teachers.
  • Provide clear signage at and around • Bicycle and Pedestrian Curricula
 the school property to remind families Guide: A guide to bicycle and
 about procedures for school drop-off pedestrian education for students.
 and pick-up. • Safe Routes to School and Student
Many cities and states have classroom Leaders: Facilitator’s Guide to
lesson plans and resources for teaching Engaging Middle School Youth: –
students about bicycle and pedestrian Education guide specifically aimed at
safety. Here are some options: middle schoolers.
  • BikeWalkKC: – serves dozens • Cycle Quest (Elk Grove, California): –
 of schools and thousands of kids An activity book and resource library
 every year in Kansas City area to help students and their care givers
 and can provide bicycle education learn how to bike safely throughout
 classes to Kansas communities. The their community.
 organization is currently working on • Bikeology: A ready-to-use bicycle
 creating a pedestrian safety offering! safety curriculum developed by the
  • Let’s Go NC! (North Carolina): A National Highway Traffic Safety
 pedestrian and bicycle safety skills Administration (NHTSA) and SHAPE
 program for elementary schools, America for physical education
 including lessons plans and videos. teachers and recreation specialists
  • California Pedestrian and Bicycle working with students in grades 6-12.
 Safety Curriculum for Grades 4 and
 5: A program aligned with California Activity Lead
 education standards specifically for School district teachers, health or PE
 upper elementary school students. teachers, coaches, parents, drivers
  • Roll Bicycle Education Into Your education classes, law enforcement,
 Physical Education Program: This advocacy groups
 fact sheet explains the why and the


161 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Other Resources and Examples
  • School Bus Safety Tips (Safe Kids) • Bike Safety Tips (Safe Kids)
  • Helmet Fit Test (Safe Kids) • Rules of the Ride (Safe Kids)
  • Pedestrian Safety (NHTSA) • Pedestrian Safety Lesson Plan:
  • A Caregiver's Guide to Raising a Safe Walking Safely Near Traffic (KDOT)
 Walker (KDOT)
  • Driver Education Videos (LAB)




IMAGE A.3 Bike education at Fayetteville High School



 APPENDICES | 162
Enforcement TABLE A.4 Enforcement
 Recommendations

The goals of SRTS are supported by promoting compliance with traffic laws in areas
surrounding schools, involving support from law enforcement, as well as trained
volunteers and school staff members.

 Recommendation Description Lead Implementer(s)


 Establish school This will reinforce school procedures on and
  drop-off and pick-up School District
 monitors around the school campus.


 Include law enforcement representatives on
 Partner with local advisory committees to help with education City, School
 law enforcement and purposeful speed enforcement in school District
 zones.

 Establish training and procedures for
 Support crossing crossing guards to ensure adequate staffing. City, School
 guards Find more information in these Adult School District
 Crossing Guard Guidelines.


 Students, teachers, and community
 volunteers can participate in walk audits to
 evaluate conditions along key walking routes
 and identify barriers to safe and comfortable
 travel. The enforcement of City code is
 largely complaint-based, requiring issues like City, School
  Student Walk Audit
 sidewalk or trail obstructions to be reported District
 to the City through See-Click-Fix. Walk
 audits provide a proactive way to document
 concerns, all while educating students
 about their neighborhoods and municipal
 government.



Crossing Guards presence of pedestrians and the necessary
 precautions to take while driving
Crossing guards are everyday heroes
 near them. The presence of crossing
and leading ambassadors for Safe
 guards can encourage more parents to
Routes to School. They help children
 feel comfortable about their children
safely cross the street at key locations,
 walking or bicycling to school. While the
while also reminding drivers of the


163 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
primary role of a school crossing guard
is to guide children safely across the
street, children also remain responsible
for their own safety. In this manner, a
guard plays another key function—a role
model helping children develop the skills
necessary to cross streets safely at all
times.

The design and implementation of an
adult school crossing guard program is
largely the decision of local communities.
Currently, the Fayetteville School District
employs crossing guards. Some federal IMAGE A.4 A crossing guard at Lafayette St. and
guidance exists and there are some state N. College Ave. help guide a family to school
and local requirements pertaining to
 drivers are familiar with their actions and
the operation of guard programs, but
 those actions are clearly interpreted by
these vary across the country. Ideally,
 all drivers—even those who are new to
the development of a school crossing
 the community. At minimum, crossing
guard program involves a community
 guards require a high-visibility safety
partnership that includes the expertise
 vest (Class 2 or better), a whistle (either
of law enforcement agencies, traffic
 a hand whistle or traditional blown
engineering or planning departments, and
 whistle), and an 18 inch stop paddle that
school systems. Working together with
 is compliant with the Manual on Uniform
parents, this community group identifies
 Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Other
the locations where school crossing
 equipment or upgraded equipment may
guards are needed and the appropriate
 include an LED stop paddle (ideal when
number of guards for each location. Some
 speeds at the crossing exceed 30 MPH),
wider, multi-lane intersections require
 reflective gloves and outerwear, reflective
more guards. The group establishes
 hat, and mid-crossing temporary sign/
crossing procedures for a variety of traffic
 bollards.
situations as well as hires, trains and
equips the guards and secures long-term
funding for the program.
 Other Resources and Examples
 • Adult School Crossing Guard
Crossing Guard training and equipment Guidelines
also vary across jurisdictions. Crossing
 • SRTS Guide Adult School Crossing
Guards should be predictable and
 Guards
consistent across the community so that

 APPENDICES | 164
School Zone Traffc
Enforcement
Enforcement is a critical component of
school zone safety that promotes SRTS
by reducing speeds and addressing
behaviors that place students at risk
during arrival and dismissal. Focused
enforcement in school zones reinforces
expectations of safe driving and helps
create predictable, low-stress conditions
for students walking, bicycling, and
rolling to school.

Targeted enforcement allows law
enforcement to concentrate efforts on
specific locations, times, and behaviors
identified through data, observations,
and community input. By prioritizing
school zones and key routes with
persistent speeding or safety concerns, IMAGE A.5 A safe route to Root Elementary
this approach improves effectiveness and School—with friends along the way
can make the most of limited resources.

Additionally, temporary speed feedback high-volume roadways—automated
signs can complement enforcement enforcement devices can support law
by increasing driver awareness and enforcement. ARDOT has already
encouraging voluntary compliance with utilized speed cameras and distracted
posted school zone speed limits. When driving cameras to increase safety in
placed temporarily, these signs reinforce work zones. The devices alert on-site
safe speeds and avoid drivers becoming law enforcement officers who must be
desensitized to them. It is important present in order to issue a violation.
that feedback signs not display vehicle In addition to highway work zones,
speeds above the posted limit, to not this technology is specifically allowed
reaffirm excessive speeding. in school zones according to Arkansas
 Code § 27-52-111(c)(1).
For longer road segments with persistent
speeding—such as high-speed and


165 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Other Funding Opportunities
and Resources TABLE A.5 Other Funding
 Opportunities & Resources

Beyond the state level, there are many other organizations that provide funding for
projects or activities that improve walking, bicycling, and rolling. Below are a few links
to start with:


 Recommendation Description Lead Implementer(s)


 AARP provides small grants to fund “quick- City, School
 AARP Community District, Public
 action” projects that make a community more
 Challenge Charity such as a
 livable for people of all ages and abilities. PTO

 The Union Pacific railroad offers grants
 Union Pacific
 within several “priority cause areas”: safety, Public Charity
 Community Ties
 workforce development, community vitality, such as PTO
 Giving Program
 and environmental sustainability.

 K-12 public schools and 501(c)(3) public
 charities are eligible to apply for Spark City, School
 Walmart Spark District, Public
 Good grants that benefit the community,
 Good Grant Charity such as a
 particularly near local Walmart and Sam's PTO
 locations.

 League of LAB's Bicycle Friendly America program City, School
 American Bicyclists awards both projects and programs that District, Public
 Community Spark spark change to make bicycling safer, easier, Charity such as a
 Grants and more accessible. PTO

 Safe Routes to Mini-grants are available to support Walk City, School
  Schools Partnership to School Day events, including giveaways, District, Public
  Ruby Bridges Walk printing, supplies, volunteer stipends, Charity such as a
 to School Grant t-shirts, food, and more. PTO

 Inclusive Outdoor Access:
 Clif Family Catalyze solutions that expand access to safe Public Charity
 Foundation places to enable healthy physical activity and excluding PTOs
 improve mental health




 APPENDICES | 166
Appendix B: Bicycle Parking
Bicycle Parking can be a single rack—or a group of racks—and should be
visible and within 50 feet of the school entrance.




 Recommend Recommend



Inverted U bike rack Bike corral


Primary Recommendation:
INVERTED U (staple and loop)
Common style appropriate for many uses; two points
of ground contact. Can be installed in series on rails to
create a free-standing parking area in variable quantities. Available in many variations.


Keep in Mind: What is the purpose of bicycle
Surface: parking near schools?
 ◦ Pavement or crushed stone preferred • Bicycle parking near campus gives
• Nearby Objects:
 students and staff a place to secure their
 ◦ Place bike parking 2-3 feet away from
 buildings or other objects. bike during the day while they are at
• Visitors/Staff: school.
 ◦ Provide bike parking for a few adult • Encourages students and school staff to
 staff/visitors as well as students ride their bikes to school.
• Take bike parking to the next level by: • When located near the main entrance,
 ◦ Covering bike parking from the rain bike parking makes it inviting for
 and sun people who get to school by bike.
 ◦ Providing an air pump on-site
 • Communicates that bicycling is
 ◦ Adding art, signage, or wayfinding
 (e.g., painted footprints that lead from encouraged
 the bike rack to the entrance)

 167 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Avoid Avoid



Wave bike rack at Root Elementary Custom weld bike rack at Leverett Elementary


Avoid:
WAVE & CUSTOM WELD
Not intuitive or user-friendly; real-
world use of this style often falls short
of expectations; supports bike frame at only one location when used as intended.


Where is bike parking installed? How much does bike parking
• Every school should have enough bike cost?
  parking to meet the day-to-day needs $: Bike parking is relatively inexpensive.
  of students and staff. Bike parking at
  schools is currently the responsibility Bike Corrals
  of the school district. Sometimes the best place to install bike
• When deciding where to install bike parking is on the street or in a parking
  racks, the school district’s facilities lot. A bike corral can be installed in place
  group considers locations that are: of a vehicle parking space, providing
 ◦ Immediately noticeable upon enough space for 6-12 bikes in place of
 arriving one car.
 ◦ Visible from nearby windows and
 the street to ensure bikes are secure
 ◦ Publicly accessible


 APPENDICES | 168
 Install/Repaint Install Curb Install/Update
 Crosswalk Extension Curb Ramp




 103 crosswalks 37 projects 116 ramps

 $101,500 $464,400 $253,440




 Appendix C:
 Project Recommendations
 Install/Repair Install Speed Install Pedestrian Install Raised
 Sidewalk Cushions Refuge Island Crosswalk




  6,705 linear feet 8 projects 7 projects 13 crosswalks

 $477,450 $80,000 $50,820 $130,000


 Install PHB/
 Shared Use Path Install Stop Sign Install RRFB
 HAWK

 CROSSWALK

 STOP
 ON RED




 8,294 linear feet 10 signs 9 projects 1 project

 $2,043,504 $3,900 $90,000 $78,000


169 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Install/Update
 Curb Ramp
Treatment Costs:
 • Installation: $6,000 EA
 • Update: $720 EA




 Install/Repaint
 Crosswalk
Treatment Costs:
 • Installation: $1,000 EA
 • Repaint MMA Continental
 Crosswalk: $1,040 EA
 • Repaint Thermoplastic White
 Continental Crosswalk: $850 EA
 APPENDICES | 170
 Install Raised
 Crosswalk
Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $10,000/crossing




  Install Pedestrian
 Refuge Island
Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $7,260/crossing




  171 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Install RRFB

Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $10,000 EA




 CROSSWALK

 STOP
 ON RED




  Install HAWK

Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $78,000 EA




 APPENDICES | 172
 Install Curb
 Extension
Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $12,900/crossing




 Install/Repair
 Sidewalk
Treatment Costs:
 • Installation: $15/sf
 • Repair: $15/sf



 173 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Install Shared Use
 Path
Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $18/sf




Install Rumble Bar

Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $1,500/lane
  approach


 APPENDICES | 174
Install Speed Cushion
 (Concrete)
 Treatment Cost:
  • Installation: $10,000 EA




 Install Speed
 Cushion (Rubber)
 Treatment Cost:
  • Installation: $1,000 EA




  175 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Install Crosswalk
 Sign
Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $390 EA




  Install Stop Sign

Treatment Cost:
 • Installation: $390 EA




 APPENDICES | 176
Appendix D: Prioritized
Infrastructure Recommendations
Using the criteria detailed in Section 6 - Impact and Implementation, the table below
categorizes all 170 infrastructure recommendations according to their calculated
impact level. Three general categories—high, medium, and low—help prioritize

  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 1 ALLPS School of Innovation 5 S Sang Ave & W Mitchell St Intersection
 W Old Farmington Rd (S Key
 2 ALLPS School of Innovation 9
 West Dr to S Root Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 W Old Farmington Rd & ALLPS
 3 ALLPS School of Innovation 11
 Entrance
 Mid-block Crossing

 Shamblin Apartments School
 4 Asbell Elementary School 1
 Access
 Internal Connectivity

 W Skyler Dr & N Evening Shade
 5 Asbell Elementary School 2
 Dr
 Intersection

 6 Asbell Elementary School 3 FPS Sports Facility Access Internal Connectivity

 N Sang Ave (W Skyler Dr to W
 7 Asbell Elementary School 4
 Lawson St)
 Along the Roadway

 N Sang Ave (W Holly St to W
 8 Asbell Elementary School 7
 Lawson St)
 Along the Roadway

 Butterfield Trail Elementary
 9 School
 11 N Old Missouri Rd & E Eton St Intersection

 S Buchanan Ave & School
  10 Fayetteville High School 9
 Entrance
 Mid-block Crossing

 W Martin Luther King Jr Blvd (S
  11 Fayetteville High School 11 Razorback Rd to College/School Along the Roadway
 Ave)
  12 Fayetteville High School 13 W 6th St & S Stadium Dr Intersection
 W Martin Luther King Jr Blvd
  13 Fayetteville High School 15
 (Stadium Dr to Hill Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 S Stadium Dr (MLK Blvd to Tsa-
  14 Fayetteville High School 17
 La-Gi Trail)
 Along the Roadway

 Happy Hollow Elementary
  15 School
 11 Crossover Rd & Peppervine Dr Intersection

  16 Holcomb Elementary School 1 N Salem Rd & W Crystal Dr Intersection


177 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 recommendations with the greatest potential to drive impact along lines of safety,
 demand, equity, and infrastructure.

 Map IDs correspond with the Map ID listed on each school's infrastructure
 recommendations map, listed in Section 7 - Campus Assessments and
 Recommendations.


 Recommendation Description Impact
 Install raised crosswalk and RRFB. High

 Address uplift and drop-off at inlet. High

  Install curb extension and raised crosswalk from ALLPS entrance to sidewalk on south side.
 High
 Evaluate use of RRFB at this location.
 Access from apartment complexes to the north - possible accessibility/visibility improvements
 High
 needed. Reduce crossing distance by installing calming devices.

 Install high-visibility crosswalks on north and east legs of intersection. High

Possible paved connection (with keyed access) to the east through FPS sports fields property and
 High
 parking lot.
 Stripe parking lot entrance to shorten driveway width and formalize parking; Consider
 High
 pavement treatments or curbing to formalize narrowed driveway.

 Upgrade the existing sidewalk to a sidepath per the City's Master Trail Plan. High

 Install curb extensions for the west corners; Install center refuge island for the north leg. High

 Install RRFB; Upgrade curb ramp on east side of Buchanan. High


 Stripe crosswalks across driveways and relocate signage as needed. High

 Implement LPI; Increase pedestrian signal phase; Prohibit Right-on-Red at all approaches. High

 Consider installing median and other traffic calming measures. High

 Increase sidewalk width on east side of Stadium; Add sidewalk to the west side between MLK
 High
 Blvd and Tsa-La-Gi Trail. Bridge may pose a constraint.

 Add Yield to Pedestrian signage for southbound vehicles. High

  Install DWS at NE, SE, and SW corners; Install curb extensions on NE and SE corners; Mark
 High
 crosswalk on west leg; Install raised crosswalk on south leg.


 APPENDICES | 178
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
  17 Holcomb Elementary School 7 N Salem Rd & School Driveway Intersection

  18 Holcomb Elementary School 9 N Salem Rd & Bentgrass Rd Intersection

  19 Holt Middle School 1 N Rupple Rd & W McLaren Dr Intersection
 N Rupple Rd (W Clearwood Dr
  20 Holt Middle School 2
 to W Edgewater Dr)
 Along the Roadway

  21 Holt Middle School 3 W Clearwood Dr & N Rupple Rd Intersection

  22 Holt Middle School 5 N Rupple Rd & School Entrance Intersection
 N Rupple Rd (W Clearwood Dr
  23 Holt Middle School 6
 to W Mount Comfort Rd)
 Along the Roadway

 W Mount Comfort Rd & N
  24 Holt Middle School 7
 Rupple Rd
 Intersection

  25 John L Colbert Middle School 5 S Rupple Rd & W Eisenhower Pl Intersection
 N Garland Ave (Wedington/
  26 Leverett Elementary School 2
 North to Cleveland)
 Along the Roadway

  27 Leverett Elementary School 4 N Garland Ave at W Berry St Intersection

  28 Leverett Elementary School 6 W Berry St (Oakland to Leverett) Along the Roadway

  29 Leverett Elementary School 9 N Garland Ave at W Eagle St Intersection

  30 Leverett Elementary School 11 W Eagle St (Garland to Leverett) Along the Roadway

  31 Leverett Elementary School 14 N Hall Ave and W Cleveland St Intersection

 W Cleveland St (N Garland Ave
  32 Leverett Elementary School 15
 to N Lindell Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 W Cleveland St and N Garland
  33 Leverett Elementary School 16
 Ave
 Intersection

 N Garland Ave (W Cleveland St
  34 Leverett Elementary School 18
 to W Maple St)
 Along the Roadway

 M O Ramay Junior High S Sang Ave (W Stone St to W
  35 School
 4
 M.L.K. Jr. Blvd)
 Along the Roadway

 M O Ramay Junior High W Old Farmington Rd (S Root
  36 School
 13
 Ave to S Sang Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 M O Ramay Junior High W Martin Luther King Jr Blvd &
  37 School
 14
 S Hollywood Ave
 Intersection


  38 McNair Middle School 3 N Starr Dr & E Mission Blvd Intersection



179 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact
 Install pedestrian refuge island. High
Mark high-visibility crosswalks on the east and west legs of the intersection; Install RRFB and
 High
 raised crosswalk at north leg.
 Add high-visibility crosswalk on east leg of intersection. High
Remove continuous center-turn-lane and implement traffic calming measures such as chicanes
 High
 and speed cushions.
 Install crosswalk on east leg of intersection. High

 Install DWS at SW curb ramp; Install raised crosswalk at RRFB. High
 Add speed feedback sign in Northbound direction. Evaluate traffic calming treatments and
 High
 reduced speed limit.
 Install curb extension to NW corner; Reconstruct sidewalk to trail on NW corner; Add "No-
 High
 Right-on-Red" across trail crossing; Install raised crossing in right-turn bypass lane.
 Install RRFB. High
Investigate road and/or lane diet to addressing speeding and allow for vehicle queuing along
 High
 southbound Garland.
 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection. High

 Complete sidewalk gaps along north side of Berry. High

 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection. High

 Remove obstructions and repair sidewalks; Complete sidewalk gaps. High
 Reconstruct sidewalk and curb at SW corner to have crosswalk terminate outside driveway
 High
 apron; Install RRFB.
Repair uplifted panels around drainage inlet at NE corner of Garland and Cleveland; Explore
 High
 options to reduce or remove parking space at 1088 Cleveland.
 Add mountable aprons at all 4 corners; Implement LPI and No-Right-on-Red; Increase
 High
 pedestrian signal phase.

 Evaluate the feasibility of a lane reconfiguration/reduction to address speeding. High

 Install speed cushions and upgrade sidewalk to shared use path per city plans. High

 Install sidewalk on south side (back of 2190 M.L.K. Jr Blvd) and install speed cushions. High

 High traffic intersection along high injury network; Major barrier for student travel to
 High
 restaurants and other frequent destinations.
 Reconstruct SW corner to close north-facing curb ramp; Install high-visibility crosswalk
  at south leg; Add curb ramp at SE corner for south leg of the crosswalk; Adjust signal for
 High
northbound traffic to No Right Turn during pedestrian phase; Add time to pedestrian phase;
 Install stop bar in northbound travel lane.


 APPENDICES | 180
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 E Mission Blvd & N Vandergriff
  39 McNair Middle School 4
 Dr
 Intersection

  40 McNair Middle School 5 N Box Ave & E Mission Blvd Intersection


 N Crossover Rd & E Mission Along the
  41 McNair Middle School 6
 Blvd Roadway|Intersection


  42 McNair Middle School 8 N Hunters Rdg & E Cherokee Dr Intersection
 E Mission Blvd (N Box Ave to N
  43 McNair Middle School 9
 Vandergriff Dr)
 Along the Roadway

 Along the
 W Persimmon St & School
  44 Owl Creek Elementary School 1
 Driveway
 Roadway|Mid-block
 Crossing
 N Wordsworth Ln & W Along the
  45 Owl Creek Elementary School 2
 Persimmon St Roadway|Intersection
 W Persimmon St (N Rupple Rd
  46 Owl Creek Elementary School 3
 to N Keats Dr)
 Along the Roadway

  47 Owl Creek Elementary School 4 W Persimmon St & N Rupple Rd Intersection
 N Ramsey Ave (E Cicero Ln to E
  48 Root Elementary School 1
 Mission Blvd)
 Along the Roadway

  49 Root Elementary School 4 E Mission Blvd & N Jordan Ln Intersection

 Along the
  50 Root Elementary School 5 E Mission Blvd & N Ranch Dr
 Roadway|Intersection
 N College Ave (E Davidson St to
  51 Washington Elementary School 2
 E Maple St)
 Along the Roadway

  52 Washington Elementary School 8 N College Ave & Maple St Intersection

  53 Washington Elementary School 15 E Lafayette St & N College Ave Intersection

 E Poplar St (N Green Acres Rd to
  54 Woodland Junior High School 3
 N Woodland Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 E Poplar St (N Green Acres Rd to
  55 Woodland Junior High School 5
 N College Ave)
 Along the Roadway



  56 Woodland Junior High School 6 E Poplar St & N College Ave Intersection



  57 Woodland Junior High School 7 N Gregg Ave & W Poplar St Intersection


181 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact
Install PHB; Upgrade curb ramp at NW corner; Restripe high-visibility crosswalk at north leg; Install
 High
 rumble bars to alert east and westbound vehicles on Mission; Install pedestrian-scale lighting.
 Install high-visibility crosswalk and stop bar at north leg of intersection; Install “Yield to
 High
 Pedestrians” signage along Mission Blvd.
 Geometry and accessibility issues support intersection reconstruction (reducing curb radii and
 the 30' westbound and eastbound lane widths). In the near term, upgrade all curb ramps; add
 High
mountable truck aprons at all four corners; narrow through and turn lanes as appropriate; adjust
 signalization to add LPI and additional time for pedestrian phase.
 Install new curb ramp at SE corner; Upgrade curb ramp at NE corner with DWS. High

 Install sidepath per the City's Master Trails Plan. High

 Install RRFB and raised crosswalk; Consider traffic calming measures (e.g., speed cushions) for
 High
 approaches.

 Add two sidewalk connections from W Persimmon St to sidewalks internal to the subdivision. High

 Add signage for school speed zone for westbound direction; Install speed cushions. High

Consider protected left-turn phase, No-Right-on-Red, and mountable truck aprons at all corners. High

 Install sidewalk. High

Reconstruct median to provide pedestrian refuge island and install marked crosswalk and DWS
 High
 in curb ramps at the north leg of intersection.
  Complete sidewalk on north side of E Mission Blvd to N Ranch Dr in front of 1428 E Mission
 High
 Blvd.

 Stripe commercial driveways and consider narrowing driveway curb cuts. High

 Install LPI; Increase pedestrian signal phase; Reconstruct SE corner to allow ADA and consider
 High
 closing commercial driveway.
Reconstruct curb ramps at all four corners to improve ADA; Install LPI; Implement No-Right-on-
 High
 Red.
Repair sidewalk on north side; Install sidewalk where missing; Install shared use path on south
 High
 side of Poplar.

 Install shared use path on south side and sidewalk on north side. High

Reconstruct intersection with safe crossings, considering the future Ramay Junior High location
 just east of this area. At-grade improvements should include high-visibility crosswalks, LPI,
 High
No-Right-on-Red, and protected signal phasing. The feasibility of a bike-ped tunnel should also
 be investigated, given the significance of this east-west connection.
 Intersection to be reconstructed under SS4A grant; Railroad crossing improvements
 High
 recommended.

 APPENDICES | 182
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 W Stone St (S Cross Ave to S
  58 ALLPS School of Innovation 2
 Sang Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 W Old Farmington Rd & S
  59 ALLPS School of Innovation 8
 Melbourne Dr
 Intersection

 S Sang Ave & W Old Farmington
  60 ALLPS School of Innovation 12
 Rd
 Intersection

 S Hollywood Ave & W Pasadena
  61 ALLPS School of Innovation 15
 Lnk
 Intersection

  62 Asbell Elementary School 5 W Lawson St & N Sang Ave Intersection

  63 Asbell Elementary School 6 N Sang Ave & W Holly St Intersection

  64 Asbell Elementary School 8 W Holly St & N Sang Ave Intersection
 Butterfield Trail Elementary N Old Missouri Rd (Sweetbriar
  65 School
 1
 Dr to Farr Ln)
 Along the Roadway

 Butterfield Trail Elementary E Stubblefield Rd (N Southridge
  66 School
 4
 Dr to N Summerhill Dr)
 Along the Roadway

 Butterfield Trail Elementary E Stubblefield Rd (N Old
  67 School
 6
 Missouri Rd to N Southridge Dr)
 Along the Roadway

 Butterfield Trail Elementary N Old Missouri Rd & E
  68 School
 7
 Stubblefield Rd
 Intersection

 Butterfield Trail Elementary Fayetteville Health & Rehab
  69 School
 9
 Center
 Internal Connectivity

 Butterfield Trail Elementary E Eton St (Elizabeth Ave to Old
  70 School
 10
 Missouri Rd)
 Along the Roadway

 W Bulldog Blvd (Delaware Ave
  71 Fayetteville High School 2
 to Buchanan Ave)
 Along the Roadway

  72 Fayetteville High School 8 S Stadium Dr & W Carlson Dr Intersection

  73 Fayetteville High School 10 FHS SW Driveway Internal Connectivity

 W Martin Luther King Jr Blvd &
  74 Fayetteville High School 16
 S Duncan Ave
 Intersection

 Happy Hollow Elementary
  75 School
 6 Water/Sewer Easement Internal Connectivity

 Happy Hollow Elementary E Peppervine Dr (west of S
  76 School
 7
 Woodsprings Dr)
 Along the Roadway

 Happy Hollow Elementary E Peppervine Dr & S
  77 School
 8
 Woodsprings Dr
 Intersection




183 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact

 Fill sidewalk gaps at 1942 and 2026 W Stone St. Medium

Replace crosswalk markings with high-visibility crosswalk marking, add stop bar, and relocate
 Medium
 stop sign behind crosswalk.

 Install raised crosswalk on west leg across Old Farmington Rd. Medium

 Install marked crosswalks; Install curb ramps on NW and NE corners; Complete sidewalk
 Medium
 connections across north leg and east leg of intersection.
 Install curb ramp on SW corner of intersection. Medium
Install marked crossing over W Holly St; Update curb ramps for crossing of N Sang with DWS;
 Medium
 Install curb ramp on SW corner for crossing Holly.
 Mark crosswalk across W Holly St; Install DWS on curb ramps across east leg. Medium
 Widen sidewalk to shared use path from Sweetbriar Dr to Butterfield Elementary. The bridge
 Medium
 over Missouri Creek poses a design constraint.

 Install sidewalk on south side to reach Harold St. Medium

 Repair uplifted sidewalk panels. Medium

 Improve lighting; Install RRFB; Install refuge island. Medium

 Install a paved connection and safe crossing through car pick-up lanes to the remote pick-up/
 Medium
 drop-off parking lot and Raven Trail north of campus.

 Improve sidewalk, especially near driveways, including ADA. Medium

 North side sidewalk needs repair. Missing sidewalk on north side west of parking lot to
 Medium
 Delaware Ave.
Add high-visibility crossing across Carlson Dr (west side); Install raised crossing across Stadium
 Medium
 Dr.
 Create safe crossing or separate pathway/ramp down to Stadium Dr for students walking by
 Medium
 installing parking lot crossings, walking lane, ramp down to sidewalk, etc.
 Improvement needed at this intersection. Since the street is one-way, consider installing
  traffic delineators to restrict the width and reduce crossing distances on the north leg of the Medium
 intersection.
Recommend constructing trail under overhead power lines in water/sewer easement that spans
 Medium
 from Peppervine Dr to Happy Hollow Rd.

 Connect sidewalk to shared use path; Add wayfinding. Medium

 Convert to 4-way stop; Install high-visibility crosswalks on all legs of intersection. Medium




 APPENDICES | 184
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type

 Happy Hollow Elementary E Peppervine Dr & The Cliffs
  78 School
 9
 Trail
 Mid-block Crossing

 Happy Hollow Elementary
  79 School
 10 S Woodsprings Dr & Trail Mid-block Crossing

 Happy Hollow Elementary
  80 School
 12 Happy Hollow Property Internal Connectivity

 Happy Hollow Elementary Happy Hollow Elementary
  81 School
 13
 Property
 Internal Connectivity

  82 Holcomb Elementary School 2 W Crystal Dr & N Rutile Dr Intersection

  83 Holcomb Elementary School 8 Holcomb Elementary Property Internal Connectivity
 N Salem Rd & Clabber Creek
  84 Holcomb Elementary School 12
 Trail
 Mid-block Crossing

  85 John L Colbert Middle School 1 W Bronco Dr Along the Roadway

  86 John L Colbert Middle School 4 W Sante Fe St & S Rupple Rd Intersection
 Southeast of John L Colbert
  87 John L Colbert Middle School 6
 Middle School Property
 Internal Connectivity

  88 John L Colbert Middle School 7 Magnolia Crossing Subdivision Internal Connectivity

  89 Leverett Elementary School 1 N Garland Ave at W Hughes St Intersection

  90 Leverett Elementary School 3 N Lindell Ave (Hughes to Eagle) Along the Roadway

 N Storer Ave (North to
  91 Leverett Elementary School 8
 Cleveland)
 Along the Roadway

  92 Leverett Elementary School 13 W Cleveland St (Sang to Oliver) Along the Roadway


  93 Leverett Elementary School 17 W Cleveland St & N Lindell Ave Intersection

 M O Ramay Junior High
  94 School
 1 S Sang Ave & W Stone St Intersection

 M O Ramay Junior High W Mitchell St (S Sang Ave to S
  95 School
 6
 Eastern Ave)
 Along the Roadway

 M O Ramay Junior High W Old Farmington Rd & Root
  96 School
 10
 Ave
 Intersection




185 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact
 Recommend crossing improvement, ideally an RRFB (with advanced warning for eastbound
drivers) and raised crossing. Lower-cost recommendation would be in-street Yield to Pedestrian Medium
 sign, and modular crossing island given the roadway width.
Install double-sided school crossing sign with downward pointing arrows; Install high-visibility
 Medium
 marked crosswalk; Install curb ramp on west side; Install DWS on east end.

 Install paved trail connecting Woodsprings Dr to school. Medium

 Develop ADA compliant shared use path to fish pond. Medium

 Curb ramps missing DWS and marked crosswalk for north crossing of N Rutile Dr. Medium

 Install sidewalk outside of fenced area. Medium
 Remove vegetation on east side and conduct routine maintenance to improve visibility of trail
 Medium
 users.
 Fill sidewalk gap just west of Bronco Dr & Rupple Rd. Medium

 Repair cracking concrete on shared use trail. Medium

 Consider trail connection to Magnolia Crossing subdivision along property line. Medium

 Construct shared use path in overhead electric easement. Medium

 Install high-visibility crosswalk along east leg of intersection. Medium
 Fill sidewalk gaps at 816 Lindell (east side) and 903 Lindell (west side); Repair sidewalks;
 Medium
 Prioritize Lindell as north-south walking collector for neighborhood east of Garland.

 Remove obstructions and repair sidewalks; Complete sidewalk gap at 815-819 Storer. Medium

Formalize sidewalk buffer space from Sang to Oliver with vertical elements; Consider extending
 Medium
 curb and sidewalk over the long term.
 Install curb extension at NE corner and reconstruct curb extension at southwest corner. Remove
 eastbound curb ramp at the SW corner. Install DWS at remaining three curb ramps. Convert two-way Medium
stop to all-way and stripe stop bars on Cleveland. Stripe crosswalk on north and west leg of intersection.
 Install DWS on NW and SW corners as well as two ramps on SE corner; Install stop bars in all
 Medium
 directions.

 Complete sidewalk gaps at various locations along the north side. Medium

 Install marked crosswalk and DWS on both curb ramps. Medium




 APPENDICES | 186
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 N Hunter's Ridge (E Mission
  97 McNair Middle School 10 Along the Roadway
 Blvd to N Pointer Ln)
 N Whippoorwill Ct. &
  98 McNair Middle School 11 Intersection
 Cherokee Dr.
 Owl Creek Elementary Owl Creek Elementary Internal
  99 5
 School Property Connectivity
 Owl Creek Elementary Owl Creek Elementary Internal
  100 6
 School Property Connectivity
 Owl Creek Elementary W Mountain View Dr & N Along the
  101 7
 Roadway|Intersection
 School Rupple Rd
 Owl Creek Elementary Owl Creek Elementary Internal
  102 8
 School Property Connectivity
 Owl Creek Elementary
  103 9 W Persimmon St Along the Roadway
 School
 Owl Creek Elementary Owl Creek Elementary School Internal
  104 10
 School Property Connectivity
 Internal
  105 Root Elementary School 6 Root Elementary Property
 Connectivity

  106 Root Elementary School 8 E Hope St & N Eastwood Dr Intersection

 Washington Elementary W Maple St & N Highland
  107 5 Intersection
 School Ave
 Washington Elementary N Highland Ave (between W
  108 9 Mid-block Crossing
 School Lafayette and E Maple St)
 Washington Elementary N Forest Ave (W Lafayette St
  109 11 Along the Roadway
 School to W Maple St)
 Washington Elementary W Lafayette St & N Saint
  110 13 Intersection
 School Charles Ave
 Washington Elementary W Lafayette St & N Highland
  111 14 Intersection
 School Ave

 Washington Elementary E Lafayette St (Highland Ave
  112 16 Along the Roadway
 School to N Washington Ave)

 Washington Elementary Washington Elementary Internal
  113 21
 School School Property Connectivity



187 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact

 Install sidewalk. Medium

 Install mini-roundabout or four-way stop. A good candidate for tactical urbanism
 Medium
 project.

Consider rehabilitation and regular maintenance of bicycle course on south side of creek. Medium

 Develop trail connection to future Owl Creek trail. Medium

 Install curb extensions on NE and SE corners of intersection; Install pedestrian island;
 Medium
 Mark crosswalk at east leg.

 Add curb ramps at relevant locations across school property. Medium

 Install sidewalk. Medium

 Add sidewalk, curb ramps, and marked crosswalk. Medium

 Connect outlet of “Root Chute” trail to playground blacktop. Medium

 Install marked crosswalk across west leg of E Hope St; Add curb ramp to NW corner;
 Medium
 Add DWS to SW corner.
  Install raised crossing at west leg; Install marked crosswalk at north leg; Install curb
 Medium
 extension at NE corner; Add crosswalk lighting to RRFB.

  Remove existing crosswalk marking and install raised crossing at SE gym entrance. Medium

 Replace sidewalk panels and enforce sidewalk obstruction code. Medium

 Install marked crosswalk; Update curb ramp on SW corner with DWS; Install curb
 Medium
 extension on SE corner.
Install raised crosswalks on north and west legs of intersection; Reconstruct NW curb to
 Medium
 reduce radius; Add crosswalk lighting to RRFB.
  Relocate westbound school speed zone sign closer to N College Ave; Install crosswalk
markings at commercial driveways; Install bicycle lane markings at AutoZone driveway;
 Medium
 Install Bike Lane Ends sign for westbound travel. Reconstruct sidewalk as sidepath per
 the City's Master Trails Plan.

 Install sidewalk to connect to main entrance without using stairs. Medium




 APPENDICES | 188
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
  114 ALLPS School of Innovation 3 W Stone St & S Cross Ave Intersection

  115 ALLPS School of Innovation 7 ALLPS Property Internal Connectivity
 Butterfield Trail Elementary E Stubblefield Rd (in front of
  116 2 Along the Roadway
 School #1763)
 Butterfield Trail Elementary
  117 School
 3 E Stubblefield Rd (west of #3289) Along the Roadway

 Butterfield Trail Elementary E Stubblefield Rd & N
  118 5 Intersection
 School Southridge Rd
 Butterfield Trail Elementary
  119 8 E Farr Ln & Raven Trail Mid-block Crossing
 School
 Butterfield Trail Elementary
  120 12 Wagon Wheel Neighborhood Internal Connectivity
 School
  121 Fayetteville High School 1 S Stadium Dr & W Bulldog Blvd Intersection
 Bulldog Blvd & FHS North
  122 Fayetteville High School 3 Mid-block Crossing
 Entrance
 W Stone St (Buchanan Ave to
  123 Fayetteville High School 4 Along the Roadway
 Duncan Ave)

  124 Fayetteville High School 5 W Stone St & S Duncan Ave Intersection

  125 Fayetteville High School 6 S Hill Ave & W Stone St Intersection
 S Stadium Dr (Carlson Dr to
  126 Fayetteville High School 7 Along the Roadway
 MLK Blvd)
  127 Fayetteville High School 12 S Buchanan Ave & S Duncan Ave Intersection
 S Duncan Ave (S Duncan Ave to
  128 Fayetteville High School 14 Along the Roadway
 Dr. MLK Jr. Blvd)
  129 Fayetteville High School 18 W Indian Trl & S Rose Ave Intersection
 Happy Hollow Elementary
  130 1 N Gem Trl & Trail Access Intersection
 School
 Happy Hollow Elementary N Happy Hollow Rd & The Cliffs
  131 2 Intersection
 School Trail
 Happy Hollow Elementary
  132 3 The Cliffs Trails Internal Connectivity
 School
 Happy Hollow Elementary N Happy Hollow Rd & E
  133 4 Intersection
 School Paddock Rd



189 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact
 Install marked crosswalk across Cross Ave on north leg; Install curb ramp on NE corner. Low

 Address circulation and accessibility issues at numerous locations across the site. Low

 Repair sidewalk panels due to uneven pavement (e.g., drainage inlet on north side). Low

  Repair sidewalk panels at locations of uneven pavement (e.g., drainage inlet on north side). Low

 Mark crosswalk; Upgrade curb ramps; Monitor vegetation for sightlines. Low

 Install high-visibility crosswalk. Low

 Connect Wagon Wheel neighborhood under construction as of summer of 2025. Low

 Install raised crosswalk across Stadium Dr. Low
  Add raised crosswalk; double-side crosswalk signs. Combination of missing curb ramps and
 Low
 temporary speed humps could be replaced by raised crosswalk.
 Repair three ADA issues where sidewalks intersect driveways between Buchanan Ave and
 Low
 Duncan Ave.
  Add marked crossing across Duncan Ave (north), as well as east and west crosswalks across
 Low
 Stone St; Add curb ramp to SE corner.
 Install high-visibility crosswalks at the north and west legs of the intersection. Low

 Install speed cushions. Low

 Intersection improvements needed. Low
Improvement needed; Since the street is one-way, consider installing traffic delineators to restrict
 Low
 the width and reduce crossing distances on the north leg of the intersection.
 Install pedestrian connection to trail from neighborhood on the south. Low

 Install curb ramp to access trail. Low

 The Cliffs trails should intersect with the sidewalk on Happy Hollow Rd here but was not
 Low
 visible; Clear vegetation; Add signage; Potential trail to Mt Sequoyah Woods.

 Add trail connection to apartments. Low

Add crosswalk and curb ramps for crossing across Happy Hollow Rd on south and west legs of
 Low
 intersection.



 APPENDICES | 190
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 Happy Hollow Elementary
  134 5 The Cliffs Trails Internal Connectivity
 School
 Happy Hollow Elementary Happy Hollow Elementary
  135 14 Internal Connectivity
 School Property

  136 Holcomb Elementary School 3 Apatite Dr & Crystal Dr Intersection

  137 Holcomb Elementary School 4 N Quartz Dr & W Crystal Dr Intersection

  138 Holcomb Elementary School 5 N Pyrite Dr & W Crystal Dr Intersection

  139 Holcomb Elementary School 6 W Crystal Dr & N Raven Ln Intersection

  140 Holcomb Elementary School 10 Holcomb Elementary Property Internal Connectivity

 N Salem Rd & W Clabber Creek Along the
  141 Holcomb Elementary School 11
 Blvd Roadway|Intersection
  142 Holt Middle School 4 Holt Middle School Property Internal Connectivity
 NE Corner of John L Colbert
  143 John L Colbert Middle School 2 Internal Connectivity
 Middle School Property
 East side of John L Colbert
  144 John L Colbert Middle School 3 Internal Connectivity
 Middle School Property

  145 Leverett Elementary School 5 W Berry St and N Lindell Ave Intersection

 North side of Leverett
  146 Leverett Elementary School 7 Internal Connectivity
 Elementary School campus

  147 Leverett Elementary School 10 N Lindell Ave and W Eagle St Intersection

 N Hall Ave (W Cleveland St & W
  148 Leverett Elementary School 12 Along the Roadway
 Wedington Dr)
  149 McNair Middle School 7 N Hunters Rdg & N Pointer Ln Intersection

  150 Root Elementary School 2 E Cain Dr & N Jordan Ln Intersection
 N Lunsford Ave & E Hammond
  151 Root Elementary School 3 Intersection
 St

  152 Root Elementary School 7 N Lunsford Ave & Root Chute Mid-block Crossing

 E Township St & N Vandergriff
  153 Vandergriff Elementary School 1 Intersection
 Dr




191 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact

 Add wayfinding to school. Low

Improve long neglected Happy Hollow Bicycle Course to provide space for PE bike unit practice
 Low
 and future bike clubs/programming.
 Install marked crosswalk on north leg; Repaint and upgrade crosswalk on east leg; Add
 Low
 mountable curb extension on SE corner.
 North crossing of N Quartz Dr. Low

 Install DWS on NW corner. Low

 Mark crosswalks on west and north legs of intersection. Low
  Upgrade trail to reduce 90-degree turns, adding radius to corners and aligning with Clabber
 Low
 Creek Trail.

 Install DWS. Low

 Consider multi use path/trail connection at NW corner. Low
 Plan for future paved connections to the upcoming development and trails on the north/
 Low
 northeast side of campus.

 Plan for future connectivity to Fayetteville Traverse and Dinsmore Trail. Low

 Prioritize as crossing opportunity for Lindell Ave walking route; Install high-visibility
 crosswalks at west and south legs of intersection; Upgrade curb ramps at SW and SE corners; Low
 Install all-way stop.
  Consider creating a walking path and entrance to the U of A forested property north of the
 Low
 school for nature program access.
 Install high-visibility crosswalks at south and west legs of intersection; Upgrade curb ramps at
 Low
 SE and SW corners.
Consider allowing on-street parking along one side; Relocate mailboxes obstructing sidewalk to
 Low
 opposite side.
 Upgrade curb ramps with DWS. Low

 Existing curb ramps missing DWS. Install marked crossing across N Jordan Ln. Low
 Install marked crossing and stop bar across E Hammond St; Update both curb ramps with
 Low
 appropriate DWS.
Install curb ramp on east side; double-side crosswalk signs; add “SCHOOL” to crosswalk signs;
 Low
 add thermoplastic rumble bars on approaches to crosswalk; install lighting.
Install curb ramps in median and convert into pedestrian refuge along north leg of intersection;
 Low
 add lighting; Install a raised crosswalk on the east leg of intersection.




 APPENDICES | 192
  ID School Map ID Location Geometry Type
 Vandergriff Elementary N Vandergriff Dr & School
  154 2 Intersection
 School Entrance
 Washington Elementary
  155 1 N Park Ave & W Ila St Intersection
 School

 Washington Elementary
  156 3 W Maple St & N Forest Ave Intersection
 School

 Washington Elementary W Maple St (N Mock Ave to N
  157 4 Along the Roadway
 School College Ave)
 Washington Elementary W Maple St & N Highland
  158 6 Intersection
 School Ave
 Washington Elementary
  159 7 E Maple St & Alley 1315 Intersection
 School
 Washington Elementary W Lafayette St & N Thompson
  160 10 Intersection
 School Ave
 Washington Elementary
  161 12 W Lafayette St & N Mock Ave Intersection
 School
 Washington Elementary N Saint Charles Ave & W
  162 17 Intersection
 School Boles St
 Washington Elementary N Saint Charles Ave & W
  163 18 Intersection
 School Watson St
 Woodland Junior High N Woodland Ave & W Poplar
  164 1 Intersection
 School St
 Woodland Junior High E Poplar St at Woodland
  165 2 Mid-block Crossing
 School Junior High entrance
 Woodland Junior High N Green Acres Rd & E Poplar
  166 4 Intersection
 School St
 Woodland Junior High N Greenvalley Ave & W
  167 8 Intersection
 School Miller St
 Woodland Junior High
  168 9 N Yates Ave & W Miller St Intersection
 School
 Woodland Junior High N Woodland Ave (E Poplar St
  169 10 Along the Roadway
 School to E Ash St)
 Woodland Junior High N Green Acres Rd (E Poplar St
  170 11 Along the Roadway
 School to N College Ave)




193 | FAYETTEVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
 Recommendation Description Impact

 Upgrade curb ramps to ADA standards. Low

  Install crosswalk marking and stop bar on west leg; install curb ramp on NW corner. Low

 Update curb ramps (2) with DWS at SW corner; Install crosswalk markings on east leg;
 Install north-facing curb ramp on SE corner; Convert to all-way stop and add stop bars Low
 in all directions.

 Install speed cushions. Low

 Install curb extension at SW corner and update SW and SE curb ramps with DWS. Low

 Install curb ramp on NW corner. Low

 Install marked crosswalk at south leg and update curb ramps with DWS. Low

  Install marked crosswalk on north leg and add curb ramps on NW and NE corners. Low

 Explore options for marked crosswalk and curb extensions at south leg. Low

Install marked crosswalks at west and south legs; Relocate stop sign and add stop bar for
 Low
 eastbound Watson St.
 Install high-visibility crosswalk at south leg; Install curb extension on SE corner; Update
 Low
 southeast ramp with DWS.
 Install DWS at curb ramps; double-side crosswalk signs; add thermoplastic rumble bars
 Low
 on approaches to crosswalk.

 Install high-visibility crosswalks at all four legs; Install curb ramps at all corners. Low

Install curb ramp on SE corner of intersection; Install high-visibility crosswalk on south
 Low
 leg of intersection; Update curb ramp on SW corner of intersection with DWS.

 Install marked crosswalk across Yates Ave. Low

 Install curb ramps on driveway (2). Low

 Install crosswalks across commercial driveways; Reduce driveway widths where
 Low
 feasible.




 APPENDICES | 194
 Transportation Committee Memo
 2026-1522

Meeting of April 28, 2026
To: Transportation Committee
Thru: Matt Mihalevich, Active Transportation Manager
 Justin Bland, City Engineer
 Chris Brown, Public Works Director
From: Dane Eifling, Mobility Coordinator
Subject: Vision Zero Safety Action Plan

Recommendation:
Staff recommends forwarding the Fayetteville Vision Zero Safety Action Plan to the full City Council.
Background:
Traffic crashes remain a significant public safety issue in Fayetteville and across Northwest Arkansas.
Between 2018 and 2022, 235 people in Fayetteville were killed or seriously injured in traffic crashes, with
vulnerable roadway users—people walking, bicycling, and motorcycling—accounting for a disproportionate
share of severe outcomes.
The Vision Zero Safety Action Plan builds upon the Northwest Arkansas Regional Vision Zero Comprehensive
Safety Action Plan adopted in 2023 and provides guidance for Fayetteville’s $33.5 million Vision Zero Strategy
which received a $25m grant through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Safe Streets and Roads for All
(SS4A) program.
Discussion:
The Safety Action Plan provides Fayetteville-specific strategies, actions, and priority corridors to improve
safety for all users. Key components include:


 • Safe System Approach: A framework that acknowledges human error and prioritizes designing streets
 to minimize severe outcomes when crashes occur.
 • High Injury Network (HIN): Identification of corridors where fatal and serious injury crashes are
 concentrated, allowing for targeted investment.
 • Data-Driven Strategies: Emphasis on reducing speeds, improving crossings, enhancing visibility, and
 separating users where appropriate.
 • Equity Focus: Prioritization of improvements in areas with higher social vulnerability and persistent
 poverty.
 • Implementation Framework: Action items with timelines, cost ranges, and responsible agencies to
 guide execution.

The plan also aligns with ongoing City initiatives, including Safe Routes to School planning, Complete Streets
implementation, and recently awarded federal SS4A funding for corridor safety improvements. Adoption of the
is plan will give Fayetteville a continued advantage in future SS4A Grant applications.
Budget/Staff Impact:
None

Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Attachments: Fayetteville Vision Zero Safety Action Plan




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 NWA Regional
 VISION
 ZERO
Fayetteville

Safety Action Plan
October 2025
Glossary
AASHTO: American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials
ADA: Americans with Disabilities Act
ADT: Average daily traffic
APS Accessible Pedestrian Signals
ARDOT: Arkansas Department of Transportation
CIP: Capital Improvement Plan
CSAP: Comprehensive Safety Action Plan
DOT: Department of Transportation
Design/posted/target speed: The speed at which
people are expected to drive; the target speed should
match the design speed and posted speed limit
FHWA: Federal Highway Administration
FTA: Federal Transit Administration
HIN: High-Injury Network
KSI: Killed or Serious Injury Crash
MODOT: Missouri Department of Transportation
MUTCD: Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
NWA: Northwest Arkansas
NWARPC: Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning
Commission
NACTO: National Association of City Transportation
Officials
ORT: Ozark Regional Transit
PHB: Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon
PROWAG: Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines
SAP: Safety Action Plan
SS4A: Safe Streets and Roads for All
USEPA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
VRU: Vulnerable Road Users
 South School Avenue, Fayetteville, AR



Information contained in this document is for planning purposes and should not be used for final design of any project. All results, recommendations, concept
drawings, cost opinions, and commentary contained herein are based on limited data and information and on existing conditions that are subject to change. Further
analysis and engineering design are necessary prior to implementing any of the recommendations contained herein.

FEDERAL PARTICIPATION: This notice is in accordance with the Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission (NWARPC) 2045 Metropolitan Transportation
Plan, the Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) in cooperation with local agencies, the Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT), the
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). This document was
funded in part through grant(s) from the FHWA, FTA, and/or the United States Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the NWARPC expressed
herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Department of Transportation.

NORTHWEST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY

The Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission (NWARPC) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statues and related authorities that prohibit
discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the NWARPC does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color,
age, national origin, religion or disability, in the admission, access to and treatment in NWARPC’s programs and activities, as well as the NWARPC’s hiring or
employment practices. Anyone with special communication or accommodation needs may contact Nicole Gibbs at (479) 751-7125 ext.106 or email ngibbs@
nwarpc.org. For complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the NWARPC’s nondiscrimination policies contact Nicole Gibbs, AICP, Regional
Planner – EEO/DBE (ADA/504/TitleVI Coordinator), 1311 Clayton, Springdale, AR 72762, (479) 751-7125 ext. 106, (Voice/TTY 7-1-1 or 1-800-285-1131) or the following
email address: ngibbs@nwarpc.org. This notice is available from the ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator in large print, on audiotape and in Braille.

If information is needed in another language, contact Nicole Gibbs. Si se necesita informacion en otro idioma, comuniqese Nicole Gibbs, ngibbs@nwarpc.org.

AVISO DE NO DISCRIMINACION DE LA COMISION DE PLANIFICACION DEL NORODSTE ME ARKANSAS

EL NWARPC cumple con todas las disposiciones de derechos civiles de los estatutos federales y autoridades relacionadas que prohiben la discriminacion en
programas y actividades que reciben asistencia financiera federal. Por lo tanto, la NWARPC no discrimina por razoes de raza, sexo, color, edad, origen nacional,
religion o discapacidad, el la admision, el acceso y el tratamiento en los programas y actividades NWARPC, asi como de contratacion de empleados de la NWARPC.
Lasque jas de supuesta discriminacion y consultas sobre la politica antidiscriminatoria de la NWARPC pueden ser dirigidas a Nicole Gibbs, AICP, planificador
regional – EEO/DBE (ADA/504/Titulo Coordinador VI), 1311 Clayton, Springdale, AR 72762, (479) 751-7125, (Voz/TTY 7-1-1 o 1-800-285-1131) o en la siguiente
direccion de correo electronico: ngibbs@nwarpc.org. Este aviso esta disponible en el Coordinador de ADA/504/Titulo VI en letra grande, cinta de audio y en Braille.
Si se necesita informacion en otro idioma, pongase en contacto con Nicole Gibbs, ngibbs@nwarpc.org.
Acknowledgments
The creation of the Northwest Arkansas Regional
Complete Streets Design Guide would not have been
possible without the dedication of numerous Northwest
Arkansas Regional Planning Commission (NWARPC)
staff, municipal staff from member agencies, elected
officials, and community partners. This effort was
led by the NWARPC, in partnership with the Regional
Complete Streets Working Group. Local funding
support was graciously provided by the Walton Family
Foundation.

NORTHWEST ARKANSAS REGIONAL PLANNING
COMMISSION
Tim Conklin Tim Reavis
Nicole Gibbs Luke Aiken

FAYETTEVILLE CITY STAFF

Chris Brown
Dane Eifling
Jonathan Curth
Matthew Mihalevich

PROJECT CONSULTANT
Toole Design Group




iv | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Contents
1. A Paradigm Shift. ..........................................................................................2
 Vulnerable Users . ....................................................................................................................... 2
 What is a Vision Zero Safety Action Plan? ........................................................................... 2
 The Safe System Approach. ..................................................................................................... 5
 Fayetteville’s Role in Achieving Vision Zero in NWA.......................................................... 6

2. Roadway Safety in Fayetteville Today. ......................................................10
 Plans, Policies, and Programs. ..............................................................................................10
 Community Outreach................................................................................................................11

3. Safety Analysis............................................................................................16
 Safety Analysis Findings. ........................................................................................................16
 Additional Crash Factors . .......................................................................................................17
 Local Emphasis Areas..............................................................................................................17
 Demographic Analysis..............................................................................................................20

4. Strategies and Actions................................................................................24
 Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................................24
 Actions...........................................................................................................................................24
 Action Categories.......................................................................................................................24
 What you’ll see here…...............................................................................................................25

5. Implementation and Accountability...........................................................36
 Systemic Safety..........................................................................................................................36
 Road Diets. ...................................................................................................................................38
 High Priority Corridors. ............................................................................................................39
 Sharing Responsibility for Vision Zero . ..............................................................................48
E Zion Rd, Fayetteville, AR
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1
 Gregg Ave and Sycamore St, Fayetteville, AR




 A Paradigm
 Shift
1. A Paradigm Shift

What is a Vision Zero Safety Action Plan?
Every year, people in Northwest Arkansas lose family, What’s in this Plan
friends, neighbors, and colleagues to preventable traffic
 The Fayetteville Safety Action Plan is a supplemental
crashes on our roads. Between 2018 and 2022, 1,375
 resource of the regional effort to implement the Safe
people were killed or seriously injured in crashes in the
 Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) initiative through the
region, averaging more than five people every week.
 NWA Vision Zero Plan, adopted in June 2023.
During the same time period, 235 people were killed or
seriously injured in crashes in Fayetteville. Across the This Plan identifies Fayetteville-specific strategies,
state of Arkansas, motor vehicle crashes account for actions, and priority locations to eliminate traffic-
more than twice the number of deaths as homicides. related fatalities and serious injuries. It builds on
 regional safety analysis and community input to deliver
For the last century, our transportation system
 a coordinated, data-driven roadmap for safer streets.
has been built on the belief that these crashes are
 This includes infrastructure recommendations, policy
accidents–events no one can fully prevent or predict.
 guidance, and collaboration strategies tailored to
While no one thinks traffic deaths among friends
 Fayetteville’s unique transportation context.
and family are acceptable, the historical approach
to transportation has taken roadway fatalities as an
unfortunate inevitability rather than a preventable Vulnerable Users
public health crisis.
 When a crash occurs, people walking, bicycling, and
Vision Zero is a traffic safety philosophy rooted in the
 riding motorcycles are more likely to be killed or
belief that nothing on our roadways is more important
 seriously injured. Vehicle safety technology has seen
than a human life. It represents a paradigm shift in
 significant advancements in recent decades, with
the region’s approach to road safety, beginning with
 airbags, anti-lock brakes, and lane-awareness sensors
the simple idea that traffic deaths and serious injuries
 all working to protect a driver in a crash. Pedestrians,
are preventable. Since the 1990s, Vision Zero has
 bicyclists, and motorcyclists however are unprotected
been successfully implemented across Europe and in
 and are especially vulnerable to the impact of a
more than 45 communities in the U.S.—some of which
 crash. This Plan is using the National Safety Council’s
have now had consecutive years of zero roadway
 definition for vulnerable roadway users that includes
fatalities. Vision Zero lays out a new set of principles
 motorcyclists. USDOT does not include motorcycles in
for engineering roads, educating travelers, and creating
 their definition and only includes non-motorized users.
a sense of collective responsibility for transportation
safety. In Fayetteville, vulnerable roadway users (VRUs) were
 involved in 1,422 crashes overall, accounting for 10%
 of total roadway crashes. However, when analyzing
 the most severe crashes, 107 involved a vulnerable
 roadway user, accounting for 46% of serious injuries
 and fatalities.




2 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Map 1 All Modes Crash Map




 1. A Paradigm Shift | 3
Map 2 Vulnerable Road Users Crash Map




4 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
The Safe System Approach
This Plan is Fayetteville’s roadmap to achieving Vision 2. Safe Vehicles
Zero. It is grounded in the Safe System Approach,
 Making vehicles safer can be done through advanced
which aims to eliminate fatal and serious injuries by
 driver assistance systems and by ensuring future
anticipating human mistakes and minimizing impacts on
 technology prioritizes vulnerable roadway users.
the human body when crashes do occur.
 3. Safe Speeds
The six Safe System Principles shown around the
outside ring are the fundamental beliefs that the Slower vehicle speeds increase visibility and reaction
approach is built on. times for drivers and reduce impact forces when a
1. Death & serious injury is unacceptable crash occurs. Moving towards safe speeds can be done
 through speed limit reduction, traffic calming, and
While no one likes to get in a fender-bender, this plan roadway design.
focuses on crashes that lead to deaths and serious
 4. Safe Roads
injuries.
2. Humans make mistakes Safer roads come from providing physical separation
 (like separated bike lanes and sidewalks) as well as
Even the best drivers will inevitably make mistakes that designing to accommodate human mistakes.
can lead to a crash. How we design and operate our
 5. Post-Crash Care
transportation system can ensure these mistakes don’t
have life-altering impacts. A system-wide approach means working towards
3. Humans are vulnerable safety even after a crash has occurred. This comes
 from improving emergency response, traffic incident
Human bodies can only withstand so much impact from reporting, and traffic management.
a crash before death or serious injuries occur.
4. Responsibility is shared.

Every part of our transportation system, from elected
officials to everyday users, to planners and engineers,
has a role to play in Vision Zero.
5. Safety is proactive

Rather than waiting for crashes to occur, transportation
agencies should seek to proactively identify and
address dangerous situations.
6. Redundancy is crucial

Redundancy means making sure every part of the
transportation system is safe. This way, if one part fails,
people are still protected.


The Safe System Approach is implemented through
five Elements.
1. Safe Road Users

Working towards a culture of safety starts with
developing a network of civic partners, educating
road users, and creating personal connections to the
community’s Vision Zero efforts. Figure 1 Safe System Approach


 1. A Paradigm Shift | 5
Fayetteville’s Role in Achieving Vision Zero in NWA
The Fayetteville Safety Action Plan (SAP) focuses Fayetteville’s Vision Zero Strategy
on the factors most within the control of the city, for
 As part of the U.S. DOT’s Safe Streets and Roads for
example, roadway design guidance, local policies,
 All (SS4A) program, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
and coordination with neighboring communities.
 received $25 million discretionary grant in December
Strengthening the city’s partnership with the
 2023. This funding is part of a broader $33.5 million
Arkansas Department of Transportation (ARDOT) for
 Vision Zero initiative focused on reducing traffic-related
improvements to state roads within the city is included
 injuries and fatalities through targeted infrastructure
as a top priority. Often, state roadways are the location
 improvements and public education efforts.
of a disproportionate number of the most serious
crashes. The analysis and recommendations in the The city applied for this funding to support five
Fayetteville SAP do not, however, include interstate and corridors identified as part of Fayetteville’s High Injury
fully access-controlled highways, as those roadways Network (HIN). These include:
are fully under the control of the state. • N. Gregg Ave, from North St to Drake St.
 • N. College Ave, from Sycamore St to Township St.
Current Transportation Safety Efforts • E. Joyce Blvd, from College Ave to Crossover Rd.
in Fayetteville • S. School Ave, from Martin Luther King Blvd to 15th
 St
In recent years, Fayetteville has been implementing a
number of Vision Zero-related transportation safety • W. Maple St from Garland Ave to the Razorback
efforts as recommended by the Northwest Arkansas Greenway
Regional Vision Zero Comprehensive Safety Action Plan Each corridor is receiving targeted safety upgrades and
(CSAP) and related plans. These efforts include: street design changes, aligned with the Safe System
• Developing criteria for removing or redesigning Approach. Figure 2 outlines the phased approach to
 slip lanes and analyze all slip lanes in the city for planning, environmental review, and construction
 feasibility of removal or improvement management.
• Developing guidance for equitable traffic calming The City’s SS4A website states that:
 policies and resources
 “These catalyst projects will apply the Safe
• Developing a citywide Safe Routes to School
 Action Plan to be completed in 2025 including System Approach by anticipating human error and
 infrastructure and programming recommendations accommodating human tolerances for injury. Separation
• Requiring installation of safety improvements of users in time and space is improved through the
 in coordination with road/curb work adjacent to addition of sidewalks, protected bicycle facilities and
 development projects improved signalization at crossings. All projects focus
• Reducing speed limits on all local streets to 20 mph on increasing attentiveness by changing the street
 environment by including street trees, shorter block
• Updating city standards based on best practices
 for speed management, including reduced lane lengths and on-street parking. All projects emphasize
 widths, tighter corner radii, and visual narrowing speed reduction through narrowing of travel lanes,
 through street trees, on-street parking, and other reducing speed limits, and reconfigurations of multi-
 treatments lane street cross sections that facilitate high speed-
• Prioritizing Vision Zero investments in areas with passing and create multi-threat environments for
 high social vulnerability and persistent poverty pedestrians.”
 through an SS4A award and other capital programs
 All five catalyst projects are within existing rights-of-
 way and are progressing through different stages of
 development. The City continues to move forward with
 design, permitting, and implementation in coordination
 with community stakeholder.

6 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Figure 2 Five Year Schedule Project Timeline
Source: Safe Streets and Roads for All




 1. A Paradigm Shift | 7
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2
 Highland Ave, Fayetteville, AR




 Roadway Safety in
 Fayetteville Today
2. Roadway Safety in Fayetteville Today
Plans, Policies, and Programs
In response to rapid population growth and an increase development of a Regional Complete Streets Design
in fatal and serious crashes, Northwest Arkansas Guide as a resource for member jurisdictions to design
has addressed road safety both through targeted safe multimodal transportation networks. The Complete
interventions and by integrating it into existing planning, Streets Design Guide was adopted by the NWARPC in
policies, and programs. early 2025.

 Local Plans
Planning Efforts
 At the local level, road safety has largely been
Many existing local, regional, and statewide plans have addressed through transportation plans, bicycle and
addressed the issue of road safety in some capacity. pedestrian plans, and Safe Routes to School plans.
Examples include transportation plans, bicycle and Many of these plans include recommendations for
pedestrian plans, and corridor studies. The documents reducing vehicle speeds on local roads, improving
and resources reviewed during the development of this sidewalk and bike lane networks, and increasing driver
Plan are described below. education and awareness. Specifically, the following
 Fayetteville plans, policies, and programs were
Statewide Plans
 evaluated to inform the analysis and recommendations
Arkansas and Missouri have both adopted Strategic
 of this Plan:
Highway Safety Plans that provide a statewide
framework to eliminate traffic deaths and serious • Active Transportation Plan
injuries through the Safe System Approach. The plans • Complete Streets Policy
include strategies to address the top contributing
 • Corridor Plans
factors to fatal and serious injuries. Arkansas also
has a statewide Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation • Development Code
Plan, which includes a focus on bicycle and pedestrian • Master Street Plan
safety. ARDOT’s 2023 Vulnerable Road User Safety
 • Minimum Street Standards
Assessment provides additional analysis of VRU
crashes and includes a program of safety strategies • Mobility Plan
and actions to improve safety based on local and • University of Arkansas Transportation Plan
regional input.

Regional Plans
Regional plans addressing road safety include the NWA
Bike Infrastructure Plan, NWARPC 2045 Metropolitan
Transportation Plan, and the NWA Congestion
Management Process. These plans coordinate efforts
across the region and offer insight on emerging trends
and funding opportunities, many of which inform this
Plan’s approach to regional road safety.
In 2023, the NWARPC adopted the Northwest Arkansas
Regional Vision Zero Comprehensive Safety Action
Plan, which serves as the basis for this local Safety
Action Plan. The regional plan also recommended the




10 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Community Outreach
Throughout the planning process, the public had several
chances to talk with City staff and the consulting team
about safety concerns in the city. These opportunities
included meetings with a Safety Working Group and
interviews with stakeholders.


Safety Working Group
During the development of the Regional Vision Zero
CSAP, a Safety Working Group, comprising of residents,
business, and property owners, along with agency and
city leaders, met four times during the project. They
shared their insights on key safety issues, reviewed
data, and initial findings, and gave guidance on
recommendations and implementation.
Members of the Safety Working Group continued
their efforts during the development of the Regional
Complete Streets Design Guide, meeting an additional
three times to further develop the region’s vision for
safe transportation, create a regional street typology,
and establish common design elements and an
implementation strategy.


Public Outreach
During the development of the Northwest Arkansas
Vision Zero Safety Action Plan, the City of Fayetteville
was host to two in-person engagement events, which
complemented a robust regional outreach effort that
engaged hundreds. A majority of participants indicated
that they frequently walk or bike for a variety of
purposes and wished to do so more frequently with a
safer and more connected network.
Fayetteville activities during Phase 1:
• Fayetteville Safety Demonstration Project – Dr.
 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard and South School
 Avenue
• Square 2 Square Ride (Fayetteville Start)
• Lower Ramble Event


Community Input Map
During the development of the Regional Vision Zero
CSAP, the project team used an interactive online map
to collect over 600 data points. A number of those
corresponded with the project locations included in this
Safety Action Plan, most indicating a need for improved
safety and access for non-motorized users.


 2. Roadway Safety in Fayetteville Today | 11
Map 3 Community Input Comments




12 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
3
 M.L.K. Blvd, Fayetteville, AR




 Safety Analysis
3. Safety Analysis
 where safety issues may be present. With 139 KSI
Transportation safety is a complex issue that requires
 crashes over the five-year period analyzed, the
a nuanced understanding of how roadway conditions,
 local HIN represents the most critical non-interstate
environmental factors, and human behaviors,
 corridors that should be addressed in the City. This
individually or in combination, lead to severe traffic
 chapter highlights the HIN and other key findings, along
crashes. These factors may include excessive speed,
 with a full High Injury Network (HIN) map for all modes.
roadway conditions, equipment failure, inexperience,
environmental conditions (e.g., weather, lighting,
glare), and human behaviors, including distraction, Safety Analysis Findings
impairment, and not complying with traffic laws.
 This analysis found that between 2018 and 2022, 97% of
The Fayetteville Safety Action Plan analyzes traffic
 crashes in Fayetteville involved solely motor vehicles,
crash history, including roadway and contextual factors
 however, vehicle-only crashes represented just under
associated with high-crash areas, and identifies
 62% of fatal and serious injury (KSI) crashes. For
locations similar to those “hot spots.” With the added
 comparison, motorcycles were involved in only 1.4%
layers of demographic analysis to identify the modes
 of all crashes, yet accounted for nearly 21% of KSI
and communities most severely impacted by crashes
 crashes. Similarly, while people walking and people
and Emphasis Areas identified by city stakeholders,
 bicycling were involved in 1.4% of all crashes, they were
this Plan provides a proactive approach to preventing
 involved in over 17% of KSI crashes. It bears repeating
severe crashes, rather than waiting for them to occur
 that, in total, vulnerable road users (VRU) were
before responding.
 impacted in 38% of fatal and serious injury crashes,
The Plan incorporates data-driven safety analyses to despite those modes’ involvement in just under 3% of
define a localized High Injury Network (HIN) using the total crashes in Fayetteville.
most recent six years of available data to determine




 Bicycle
 Motorcycle
 Motor Vehicle
 Pedestrian
 Unknown




Figure 3 Percentage Share of All & KSI Crash Types


16 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Additional Crash Factors Local Emphasis Areas
Rear-end, angle, and single-vehicle crashes were City of Fayetteville stakeholders identified the Dr. Martin
the most prevalent crash manners in Bentonville for Luther King, Jr. Boulevard corridor as an emphasis
both all modes and crashes involving VRUs. For KSI area of particular safety concern. The corridor was
crashes, though, single-vehicle crashes were the top the location of 2,319 total crashes and 34 KSI crashes
crash manner in both overall crashes (44%) and VRU during the five-year period analyzed. Over 17% of the
crashes (56%), followed by angle crashes (33% overall city’s 196 crashes involving vulnerable roadway users
and 29% VRU). Where VRUs were involved, rear-end and occurred along the MLK Boulevard corridor, including 8
sideswipe crashes accounted for 10% of KSI crashes. KSI crashes involving 15 non-motorists.
Speeding was a factor in over 40% of KSI crashes
involving a VRU, compared with just 4.6% for all modes
In evaluating the first harmful event for crashes, this
study found that the types of crashes most likely to
result in a fatality or serious injury were ‘fell or jumped
from vehicle,’ with a fatal or serious injury rate of 33%,
followed by ‘collision with a pedestrian’ (26%) and
‘collision with bicycle’ (18%). The highest number of KSI
crashes involved ‘collision with vehicle in transport’
at 69% of total KSI crashes, and ‘collision with a
fixed object’ at 10% of KSI crashes. During the period
analyzed, 49% of all crashes and 56% of KSI crashes
occurred on arterial roadways, followed by collectors
(19% of KSI crashes). Nearly 25% of all crashes
occurred within 500 feet of a school.




 3. Safety Analysis | 17
Map 4 Local HIN Map for All Modes




18 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Map 5 Local HIN and Community Emphasis Areas




 3. Safety Analysis | 19
Demographic Analysis
Increasing safety across the region cannot
succeed without identifying communities that
have disproportionate traffic safety impacts. The
transportation system in Northwest Arkansas must
work for everyone across the region. Together with
the Safe System Approach, recommended actions
can address safety for people that have experienced
a historical disadvantage, persistent poverty, and/or
social vulnerability.
To create a broad characterization of communities that
have sociodemographic vulnerabilities and to define
the populations, this Plan used criteria for Areas of
Persistent Poverty as identified by the USDOT.
Area of Persistent Poverty1 is defined by the USDOT as
any County or Census Tract that has consistently had
greater than or equal to 20 percent of the population
living in poverty over a defined period. The City should
consider focusing investments in these areas in order
to address adverse transportation safety impacts
and increase opportunities for mobility and access to
opportunities.




1 US Department of Transportation. SS4A Frequently Asked
  Questions. 21 May 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/grants/
  ss4a/faqs.


20 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Map 6 Local HIN and Underserved Areas




 3. Safety Analysis | 21
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
4
 W Stone St, Fayetteville, AR




 Strategies & Actions
4. Strategies and Actions
Goals and Objectives Actions
The mission of Vision Zero—to Save Lives—requires Achieving goals is not always quick or easy. Effective
changing how we design and operate our transportation implementation comes from coordinating various
system. The Safe System Approach is the foundation for agencies and people to take action focused on safety.
this change that prioritizes human life above everything The staff of agencies and their partners must have clear
else. Through this Plan’s analysis, a High Injury Network tasks. Institutions must have proper incentives and
has been established based on severity of crashes, authority to implement their mission.
roadway characteristics, individual behaviors, and Each goal is supported by actions that are assigned
unsafe speeds which highlights corridors where fatal lead agencies and timeframes. By breaking
and serious crashes are overrepresented on the overarching goals into specific actions this Plan
regional roadway network. builds a comprehensive set of efforts that together
The NWA Regional Vision Zero Plan established four will implement Vision Zero and save lives. All actions
goals for addressing roadway safety and implementing consider and support the five Safe System Elements.
Vision Zero in Northwest Arkansas and Fayetteville:
 1. Promote a culture that prioritizes people’s safety
 2. Reduce conflicts between roadway users Action Categories
 3. Establish policies, practices, and programs that • Access & Demand Management
 focus on safety at all levels
 • Communications & Education
 4. Slow vehicle speeds
 • Coordination & Partnerships
 • Crossings & Intersections
 • Implementation & Accountability
 • Lighting
 • Maintenance
 • Multimodal Networks
 • Safe Routes to School
 • Speeds & Traffic Calming




24 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
What you’ll see here…
 A. Action items- Each is a discrete, specific effort that D. Cost- There is an anticipated annual cost level listed
 can be advanced by a Vision Zero partner. with each step based on the following ranges:
 B. Asterisk (*)- Items followed by an asterisk represent a. $ - Low (less than $100k)
 systemic safety countermeasures that can be installed b. $$ - Medium (between $100k-$500k)
 on the HIN or proactively jurisdiction-wide where c. $$$ - High ($500k and above)
 similar conditions exist for crashes to potentially occur.
 Learn more about these actions in this chapter under E. Action Leader and Supporting Partners- Each action
 “Proactive Systemic Safety Countermeasures.” item is led by an action leader and supported by various
 agency partners.1
 C. Timeframe- Action items are assigned general
 1timeframes to help action leaders prioritize their F. Additional Considerations– Each action item includes
 efforts. Although the timeframes note a number of a high-level consideration of additional needs for
 years, these timeframes align with the level of effort implementation. These include:
 for completing these actions. a. INFRA – Infrastructure funding through existing or
 new sources
 Timeframes include:
 b. STAFF – Increased staff capacity through new
 a. Immediate: 0-2 years; positions or assignments
 b. Short: 2-5 years; or c. STUDY – Technical analysis or other planning study
 c. Medium-Long: 5-10 years. d. PARTNER – Partnership with external agencies or
 organizations
 e. LEG – Legislative action at the local or state level




 A C D E F
Table 2 Policies/Programs Recommended Local Actions FR A
 ST AF F
 ST UD
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support PA RT Y
 IN
 LE G  NE R


 Communications & Develop and implement Vision Zero orientation and/or
 2A Immediate $ City City Council
 Partnerships training program for all city staff

 Update local policies, signage, and messaging to align
 Crossings & with state and local law regarding the legal status of and NWARPC;
 2B Immediate $ - $$ City
 Intersections protection for people in crosswalks, including appropriate ARDOT
 stop/yield signage for drivers and trail users

 Conduct ongoing safety analyses for intersections,
 Crossings & Medium-
 2C specifically along the HIN, and implement safety $ - $$ City NWARPC
 Intersections Long
 countermeasures based on results

 Consider adopting a Roundabout First Policy--the process of
 Crossings & considering a roundabout before any other form of control NWARPC,
 2D Immediate $ City
 Intersections at an intersection--to increase user safety and reduce ARDOT
 conflict points
 Evaluate warrant requirements and guidance and update
 city policies according to best practice for the placement,
 Crossings &
 2E design, and installation of high-visibility crossing Short $ City ARDOT
 Intersections
 treatments, pedestrian refuge islands, and safety-focused
 signal enhancements.

 Establish a multidisciplinary Vision Zero Task Force tasked
 Implementation & with cross-agency collaboration, ensuring implmentation, City; NWARPC,
 2F Short $
 Accountability and measuring and reporting progress toward ARDOT ARDOT, MODOT
 transportation safety goals and targets

 Establish a road safety audit program and procedures, and
 Implementation &conduct audits with a cross-disciplinary Vision Zero Task NWARPC;
 2G Immediate $ City
 Accountability  Force after KSI crashes, along the HIN, and in the scoping ARDOT
1 “The Actions that follow  are understood to be general recommendations. For some Actions, implementation
 phase of roadway projects
 would only occur when and
 where appropriate based on further analysis, engineering design, and environmental assessment. Other Actions may require policy
 changes in alignment with  other
 Conduct agency
 before goals.
 and after safety Due  to staffing,
 and usage  studies offinancial,
 new and other constraints, each agency will need to consider how to
 Implementation & NWARPC;
 prioritize
 2H implementation
 Accountability
 of
 roadway these  Actions
 improvements  andin support of
 transportation Vision Zero.”
 projects to Long $ City
 ARDOT
 assess effectiveness and refine future applications


 Identify intersections near campus for joint improvement 4. Strategies and Actions | 25
 Crossing &
 2I projects (e.g., high-visibility crosswalks, pedestrian refuge
 Intersection
 islands).
Table 1 Culture of Safety Recommended Local Actions ST A
 AF F
 ST UD
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support FR  PA Y
 RT N
 IN LE ER
 G

 Work with media partners to report traffic crashes more
 Communications & accurately, to avoid victim blaming, and report crashes in
  1A Short $ City NWARPC
 Partnerships the context of Vision Zero, focusing on speed, operation, and
 design as contributing factors

 Adapt and amplify existing media campaigns through NHTSA,
 ARDOT, NWARPC, and other safety-focused agencies to raise
 Communications & Medium-
  1B awareness of safe roadway behavior and relevant laws, $ - $$ City NWARPC
 Partnerships Long
 including yielding to pedestrians and bicyclists, distracted
 driving, obeying posted speed limits, etc.

 Seek out professional development and training
 Communications & opportunities for transportation practitioners and decision
  1C Immediate City NWARPC
 Partnerships makers to increase their knowledge of Vision Zero best
 practices and communications strategies.

 Partner with the University of Arkansas to co-develop University
 Communications & Short-
  1D campus-specific safety education and outreach campaigns $ - $$ of City; NWARPC
 Partnerships Medium
 targeted at students and staff Arkansas

 Consider hiring Vision Zero staff dedicated to the
 Implementation &
  1E collaborative implementation and evaluation of safety Immediate $ - $$ City City Council
 Accountability
 projects and programs across agencies and organizations
 Meet routinely with ARDOT to share data, identify streets
 Implementation &
  1F of concern, develop consistent policies, and advance joint Ongoing City ARDOT
 Accountability
 projects

 Continue to prioritize Vision Zero investments in areas with
 Implementation & Medium- $$ - NWARPC;
  1G high social vulnerability, specifically Areas of Persistent City
 Accountability Long $$$ ARDOT
 Poverty

 Create a public facing dashboard for measuring and
 Implementation & reporting progress with Vision Zero implementation,
  1H Ongoing $ NWAPRC City
 Accountability including crash data and other safety metrics for transparent
 and accountability.

 Use the HIN to inform transit planning and prioritize
 Multimodal Short- Transit City; NWARPC;
  1H safety-focused investments - increased service, routing $
 Networks Medium Agencies ARDOT
 adjustments, bus stop enhancements, and accessibility

 Coordinate with university planners to integrate bike and
 Multimodal University of
  1I pedestrian network improvements within and adjacent to Immediate $ City
 Networks Arkansas
 campus boundaries


26 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Table 2 Policies/Programs Recommended Local Actions FR A
 STAF F
 ST UD
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support PA RT Y
 IN
 LE ER
 G N


 Communications & Develop and implement Vision Zero orientation and/or
  2A Immediate $ City City Council
 Partnerships training program for all city staff

 Update local policies, signage, and messaging to align
 Crossings & with state and local law regarding the legal status of and NWARPC;
  2B* Immediate $ - $$ City
 Intersections protection for people in crosswalks, including appropriate ARDOT
 stop/yield signage for drivers and trail users

 Conduct ongoing safety analyses for intersections,
 Crossings & Medium-
  2C* specifically along the HIN, and implement safety $ - $$ City NWARPC
 Intersections Long
 countermeasures based on results

 Consider adopting a Roundabout First Policy—the process of
 Crossings & considering a roundabout before any other form of control NWARPC,
  2D Immediate $ City
 Intersections at an intersection—to increase user safety and reduce ARDOT
 conflict points
 Evaluate warrant requirements and guidance and update
 city policies according to best practice for the placement,
 Crossings &
  2E design, and installation of high-visibility crossing Short $ City ARDOT
 Intersections
 treatments, pedestrian refuge islands, and safety-focused
 signal enhancements

 Establish a multidisciplinary Vision Zero Task Force tasked
 Implementation & with cross-agency collaboration, ensuring implementation, City; NWARPC,
  2F Short $
 Accountability and measuring and reporting progress toward ARDOT ARDOT, MODOT
 transportation safety goals and targets

 Establish a road safety audit program and procedures, and
 Implementation & conduct audits with a cross-disciplinary Vision Zero Task NWARPC;
  2G Immediate $ City
 Accountability Force after KSI crashes, along the HIN, and in the scoping ARDOT
 phase of roadway projects


 Conduct before and after safety and usage studies of new
 Implementation & NWARPC;
  2H roadway improvements and transportation projects to Long $ City
 Accountability ARDOT
 assess effectiveness and refine future applications


 Identify intersections near campus for joint improvement
 Crossing & University of
  2I projects (e.g., high-visibility crosswalks, pedestrian refuge Short $$- $$$ City
 Intersection Arkansas
 islands).



 4. Strategies and Actions | 27
 FR A
 STAF F
 ST UD Y
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support
 PA RT N
 IN
 LE ER
 G

 Prioritize restriping, paving, and other
 Implementation maintenance projects along HIN roadways Short- $$ -
 2I City ARDOT
 & Accountability and coordinate the installation of safety Medium $$$$
 improvements during maintenance work
 Explore the potential of incentives for developers
 Implementation to install safety improvements in coordination Planning
 2J Short $ - $$$ City
 & Accountability with required curb work adjacent to development Commission
 projects
 Establish a permanent, dedicated funding source
 for Vision Zero project implementation and
 Implementation $$$$ -
 2K coordination, including establishing a Vision Zero Medium City ARDOT
 & Accountability $$$$$
 Coordinator position within city government and a
 Vision Zero Task Force

 Adopt a formal Complete Streets Policy and
 Multimodal NWARPC,
 2L related design standards based on the NWA Immediate $ City
 Networks ARDOT
 Regional Complete Streets Design Guide

 Develop and enforce standards to ensure that
 Multimodal safe detours providing access for people walking,
  2M Short $ City NWARPC
 Networks bicycling, and using transit are maintained during
 roadway or site construction and special events




28 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Table 3 Conflict Reduction Recommended Local Actions ST
 FR A
 STAF F
 UD
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support
 PA RT Y
 IN
 LE ER
 G N

 Establish an access management policy with guidelines
 on combining driveway and cross-access between
 Access &
 developments, limiting curb cuts per block (e.g., two per Medium- $$ -
  3A* Demand City ARDOT
 1/4-mile or minimum spacing of 440 feet), and constructing Long $$$
 Management
 medians on multilane roadways to reduce conflicts near
 driveways and intersections

 Access &
 Conduct analysis of crashes related to two-way center left NWARPC;
 3B Demand Short $ City
 turn lanes and commercial access management on arterials ARDOT
 Management

 Develop criteria, guidelines, and policy to implement No Right
 Crossings &
  3C* On Red beginning with the HIN and high-volume pedestrian Short $ City ARDOT
 Intersections
 routes

 Implement leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) at signalized
 Crossings & intersections, specifically on applicable HIN corridors and Medium-
  3D* $ - $$ City; ARDOT
 Intersections revise standard details for roadway projects to include LPI as Long
 the default condition at all intersections/signal replacements

 Implement pedestrian recall on all permissive and through
 Crossings & phases, and consider removing permissive left turns during Medium-
  3E* $ - $$$ City; ARDOT
 Intersections active pedestrian phase, specifically on applicable HIN Long
 corridors


 Crossings & Design and install grade-separated trail crossings of Medium-
 3F $$$ ARDOT City
 Intersections roadways with 45 mph+ vehicle speeds Long


 Evaluate existing signal timing and implement pedestrian
 Crossings &
  3G* friendly cycle lengths, based on a maximum 3' per second of Short $ - $$ City ARDOT
 Intersections
 walking speed


 Identify priority locations and daylight intersections
 Crossings & (removing obstacles that impair sight lines) to maximize Medium-
  3H* $ City ARDOT
 Intersections visibility and crossing safety, beginning in town centers and Long
 high-volume pedestrian areas


 Prioritize joint design and funding for safer crossings near City;
 Crossings & Short- $$ - NWARPC;
 3I university housing, educational buildings, and Razorback University of
 Intersections Medium $$$ ARDOT
 Transit stops Arkansas



 4. Strategies and Actions | 29
 FR A
 STAF F
 ST UD Y
 Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support
 PA RT N
 IN
 LE ER
 G


 Install backplates with retroreflective boards at
 Crossings & Medium-
 3J* all signalized intersections and use reflectors on $$ - $$$ City ARDOT
 Intersections Long
 curves and bridges, starting with the HIN

 Install median refuge islands, protected
 intersection treatments, and high visibility ARDOT;
 Crossings &
 3K crossings along the HIN, near transit stops and Short $$$ City Transit
 Intersections
 trail crossings, and at locations with long crossing Agencies
 distances.

 Evaluate and install high-visibility mid-block
 Crossings & crossings to reduce distances between crossings Medium-
 3L $$ - $$$ City ARDOT
 Intersections along arterials with long distances between Long
 signalized intersections


 Crossings & Mark crossings consistently along the High Injury City;
 3M Medium $$
 Intersections Network, including along intersecting streets. ARDOT



 Crossings & Develop criteria for assessing and installing
 3N Immediate $ City ARDOT
 Intersections protected intersections.


 Implement systemic application of low-cost
 Crossings & intersection modifications that prioritize Short- City;
 3O* $$ - $$$
 Intersections vulnerable road users' safety and address left- Medium ARDOT
 angle crashes


 Evaluate safety for people walking and biking at
 Lighting & City;
 3P overpasses and underpasses. Improve lighting X $ - $$$$
 Visibility ARDOT
 conditions and visibility where appropriate

 Upgrade, replace, or install lighting along the
 Lighting & length of the HIN, including pedestrian-scale Short-
 3Q* City ARDOT
 Visibility lighting, especially at pedestrian and trail crossing Medium
 locations
 City;
 Improve lighting on key pedestrian corridors
 Lighting & University
 3R leading to and from University of Arkansas Medium $$ - $$$ ARDOT
 Visibility of
 campus, especially where there is high foot traffic.
 Arkansas


30 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
 FR A
 STAF F
 ST UD Y
Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support
 PA RT N
 IN
 LE ER
 G



 Multimodal Provide buffers to sidewalks and side paths (paint, Medium-
 3S $$ - $$$ City ARDOT
 Networks greenspace, trees, etc.) Long



 Assess and install bicycle and pedestrian projects
 Multimodal $$$ - NWARPC,
3T* to increase separation and complete the active Short City; ARDOT
 Networks $$$$ ARDOT
 transportation network


 Install safety projects near schools, including
 Multimodal installing high visibility crosswalks and midblock Short- $$ -
 3U City; ARDOT Public Schools
 Networks crossings, installing walkways and bikeways, and Medium $$$$
 enforcement measures

 Develop local guidelines for the siting of transit
 stops in relationship to intersections and pedestrian
 Multimodal City, Transit NWARPC,
 3V crossings to reduce dart and dash crashes; include Immediate $
 Networks Agencies ARDOT
 consideration of far-side bus stops to improve on-
 time performance and rider visibility and safety

 Build protected bike lanes and widen sidewalks on University
 Multimodal Short- $$ -
 3W corridors that connect to University of Arkansas City of Arkansas,
 Networks Medium $$$$
 campus to the surrounding city network ARDOT




 4. Strategies and Actions | 31
Table 4 Slower Speeds Recommended Local Actions A
 STAF F
 ST UD
  Group Action Category Action Time Cost Lead Support FR  PA Y
 RT N
 IN LE ER
 G


 Identify at-grade crosswalks to convert to raised
 Crossings &
 4A crosswalks through new infrastructure projects and Ongoing $ - $$$ City ARDOT
 Intersections
 land development


 Retrofit campus-adjacent intersections with tighter University
 Crossings &
 4B turn radii and signal timing adjustments to reduce Short $$ City of
 Intersections
 conflict speeds Arkansas

 Implement road diets (e.g., 4-to-3 lane conversions,
 lane narrowing, etc.) and traffic calming spot Medium-
 4C Traffic Calming $$$ City; ARDOT
 treatments (e.g., hardened centerlines, curb Long
 extensions, etc.) along the HIN where applicable

 Advocate to the Arkansas Department of
 Transportation for proactive changes to improve NWARPC,
 4D* Traffic Calming Ongoing $ City
 safety and slow speeds on state roads, freeway ARDOT
 access roads, and ramps within the city

 Implement traffic calming elements (e.g., speed
 City,
 humps, raised crosswalks, curb extensions) on key Short-
 4E Traffic Calming $ - $$ University of
 cut-through streets near University of Arkansas Medium
 campus Arkansas




32 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
5
 N Rupple Rd, Fayetteville




 Implementation
 and Accountability
5. Implementation and Accountability
Systemic Safety
Systemic safety involves applying transportation implementation of these safety countermeasures will
safety improvements across the entire roadway likely require additional funding and staff support for
network to address similar design, environmental, installation and ongoing maintenance. Some may also
and contextual conditions to those found along the require changing local or state policies and standards to
HIN. It acknowledges that the absence of a history of allow for more widespread use, for example, the use of
severe crashes does not mean that crash risk at a speed safety cameras, which is restricted by Arkansas
given location is inherently low and seeks to address state law.
potentially dangerous conditions before they contribute The following pages highlight effective safety
to a KSI crash. countermeasures that can be used proactively across
Proven safety countermeasures, which have been Rogers, several of which are included in Chapter 4 as
shown to significantly reduce crashes and crash recommended safety action strategies for the city.
severity, should certainly be applied to the Rogers Systemic safety countermeasures should be prioritized
HIN. They can also be installed proactively across to address the HIN and similar roadways, with the
the city in an effort to prevent future KSI crashes and eventual implementation in a more widespread fashion,
incorporated into city standards and guidelines for as budget and staff resources allow.
routine implementation in future projects. Systemic



 Install pedestrian-scale lighting along the HIN, especially at trail
 crossings and along arterials



 Reduce distances between crossings along arterials with long
 distances between signalized intersections



 Daylight intersections (remove obstacles that impair sight lines) in
 town centers and in high-volume pedestrian areas



 Implement leading pedestrian intervals at signalized
 intersections, specifically on applicable HIN corridors



 Implement no right turns on red on the HIN or high-volume
 pedestrian routes
 ON RED




 Adjust signal timing and signage for speed limit on arterials




Figure 4 Proven Systemic Safety Countermeasures


36 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Proven Safety Countermeasures
Addressing safety in Fayetteville and Northwest The FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures initiative
Arkansas will require the deployment of proven (PCSi) is a collection of specific design or operational
safety countermeasures across the local and regional changes to streets that have been proven nationally
transportation network, starting with the HIN. Selection to improve safety. Safety countermeasures are
and design of safety countermeasures on every street listed below along with hyperlinks to provide a more
project in Fayetteville should be decided through the detailed description and effectiveness of the full safety
lens of the Safe System Approach, so that if a crash countermeasure.
occurs it will not result in a fatal or serious injury.
Safety countermeasures should not be compromised
or simplified during the design or construction phases.
These modifications can reduce the level of safety for
all road users.

 Speed Management


 Appropriate Speed
 Speed Safety
 Limits for All Road Variable Speed Limits
 Cameras
 Users


 Pedestrian/Bicyclist


 Crosswalk Visibility Leading Pedestrian
 Bicycle Lanes
 Enhancements Interval


 Medians and
 Rectangular Rapid
 Pedestrian Refuge Pedestrian Hybrid
 Flashing Beacons
 Islands in Urban and Beacons
 (RRFB)
 Suburban Areas



 Road Diets (Roadway
 Walkways
 Reconfiguration)



 Roadway Departure

 Longitudinal Rumble
 Enhanced Delineation
 Strips and Stripes on Median Barriers
 for Horizontal Curves
 Two-Lane Roads



 Roadside Design
 Improvements at Safety Edge Wider Edge Lines
 Curves




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 37
 Intersections

 Backplates with Dedicated Left-and
 Corridor Access
 Retroreflective Right-Turn Lanes at
 Management
 Borders Intersections


 Systemic Application
 Reduced Left-Turn
 Roundabouts of Multiple Low-Cost
 Conflict Intersections
 Countermeasures at Stop-
 Controlled Intersections


 Yellow Change
 Intervals
 Crosscuttting


 Local Road Safety Pavement Friction
 Lighting
 Plans Management




 Road Safety Audit


Figure 5 Proven Safety Countermeasures by Category



Road Diets roadway width, with the possibility of repurposing
 motor vehicle travel lanes for the space and comfort
The City of Fayetteville hopes to focus on creating of people walking or biking or for public transit. When
safer, more efficient streets by reassessing the number measuring lane width for vehicle use, the lane should
and width of travel lanes on key corridors. Reducing be measured to the face of curb, inclusive of any gutter.
excessive vehicle space allows room for improvements There are two main ways to reduce space dedicated to
that benefit walking, biking, and transit access, and vehicle travel lanes—a road diet and a lane narrowing.
overall street safety. A road diet reduces the number of lanes. A lane
Vehicle travel lanes make up the largest portion narrowing reduces the width of the lanes but maintains
of the roadway on most streets. To build Complete the number of lanes. General travel lanes can be as
Streets, the number and width of vehicle travel lanes narrow as 10 feet. A center turn lane should be at least
should be minimized to the safest extent possible to 12 feed wide, and curbside lanes on bus or freight
maintain the narrowest cross section and allow room to routes may need to be 11 feet to accommodate larger
accommodate other modes. Travel lanes will have the vehicles.
greatest impact on the availability of space on public Implementing a road diet may also involve changes
streets. In creating project plans that minimize delay to to traffic signals and intersections, but the trade-
motor vehicles, planners may simultaneously prioritize offs often bring long-term benefits: improved safety,
the safety and comfort of vulnerable roadway users. calmer traffic, and space for amenities that support
This supports the comfort of other users of the street, Fayetteville’s goals around livability, equity, and
reduces speeding, and decreases impervious surfaces. sustainable transportation.
Travel lanes may be reconfigured to reduce overall


38 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
High Priority Corridors
This Safety Action Plan identifies several priority safety • North Gregg Avenue, between Razorback
corridors for which high-level safety countermeasures Greenway/Wilkerson Road and West North Street
are recommended to address specific safety needs, (3.2 miles)
including high-crash locations and roadway attributes • West Wedington Drive, between North Heritage
associated with prominent crash types. Avenue to North Garland Avenue (3.8 miles)
In Fayetteville, the Priority Safety Corridors analyzed • South School Avenue, between Nelson Hackett
are: Boulevard to West 22nd Street/West Cato Springs
• East Joyce Boulevard, between N Crossover Road Road (1.2 miles)
 and N Steele Boulevard (2.2 miles)




Map 7 Location of Priority Safety Corridors




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 39
East Joyce Boulevard
Between N Crossover Road and N Steele Boulevard (2.2 miles)

Context

This is a minor arterial road with 4 lanes, sidewalk on one side and a sidepath trail on other side. It is a Ozark
Regional Transit Route and is heavily developed with mixed land uses, including apartment complexes, single family
homes, restaurants, banks, schools, offices parks and senior housing.


 Daily Traffic: 24,000 to 30,000
 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
 Vehicles per day


 2018-2022 Crashes: 571 (256/mi) Number of Lanes: 4 continuous
 through lanes at east end and with
 Fatal and Serious Injury: 7
 additional two-way turn lanes at west
 Other Crashes: 564 end of the segment


 Key Crash Types High Injury Network Modes


 Angle Crashes
 and Rear-End
 Crashes
 Pedestrian Vehicle



Safety Analysis and Strategies
 Potential Strategies
A disproportionate share of crashes
 • Evaluate and improve access management along the corridor to limit
involved angle crashes
 left turn opportunities with the installation of a median
 • Sight distance improvement
 • Study traffic signal timing

A disproportionate share of crashes • Reduce the speed limit and evaluate engineering measures to reduce
involved people walking target speeds through lane narrowing, closure of slip lanes, speed
 feedback signs, and traffic calming measures
 • Install median and pedestrian refuge islands and a buffered shared
 use path throughout the corridor
 • Enhance the visibility of pedestrian crossings and reduce exposure
 for people crossing
 • Complete sidewalk connections on the east side of N College Ave and
 provide dedicated crosswalks designed for pedestrian safety
A disproportionate share of crashes
involved speeding and failure to yield • Yellow change intervals
to right of way • Reduced left-turn conflict interactions


40 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Potential Safety Countermeasures - East Joyce Boulevard




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 41
North Gregg Avenue
Between Razorback Greenway/Wilkerson Road and West North Street (3.2 miles)

Context

This is a minor arterial road with four continuous travel lanes, some turn lanes at intersections, and a sidewalk/
sidepath trail on one side of the corridor. The north portion of North Gregg Avenue serves as a Razorback Transit
route, and the corridor is heavily developed with mixed land uses, including apartment complexes, single-family
homes, restaurants, banks, schools, office parks, and senior housing. The portion of the roadway between Fulbright
Expressway and West Township Street carries significantly more vehicles on average (20,000 - 23,000 per day) than
the segments at either end of the corridor (10,000 - 13,000 per day).

 Daily Traffic: 10,000 to 23,000
 Speed Limit: 35 to 40 MPH
 Vehicles per day


 2018-2022 Crashes: 370 (115/mi) Number of Lanes: 4 continuous
 Fatal and Serious Injury: 8 travel lanes, with some turn lanes at
 Other Crashes: 262 intersections



 Key Crash Types High Injury Network Modes


 Angle Crashes
 and Rear-End
 Crashes
 Pedestrian Bicycle Vehicle

Safety Analysis and Strategies
 Potential Strategies
A disproportionate share of crashes
 • Evaluate and improve access management along the corridor to limit
involved angle crashes
 left turn opportunities with the installation of a median
 • Sight distance improvement
 • Study traffic signal timing

A disproportionate share of crashes • Reduce the speed limit and evaluate engineering measures to reduce
involved people walking and biking target speeds through lane narrowing, speed feedback signs and
 traffic calming measures
 • Road diets and median and pedestrian refuge islands
 • Enhance the visibility of pedestrian crossings and reduce exposure
 for people crossing
A disproportionate share of crashes • Yellow change intervals
occurred at intersections
 • Reduced left-turn conflict interactions and Dedicated Left- and Right-
 Turn Lanes at Intersections
 • Corridor Access Management


42 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Potential Safety Countermeasures - North Gregg Avenue




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 43
West Wedington Drive
Between North Heritage Avenue to North Garland Avenue (3.8 miles)

Context

This is a principle arterial road with 4 lanes with two-way turn lanes and at some segments with turn lanes,
sidewalk /sidepath on both sides. The west portion of West Wedington Drive serves as a Razorback Transit route,
and is heavily developed with single family homes, mixed land uses, including apartment complexes, restaurants,
banks, schools, offices, parks and senior housing. The portions of the corridor on either side of the I-49 interchange
carry the highest daily traffic (30,000 - 33,000), with lower daily averages beyond the nearest major intersections to
the east and west (16,000 - 22,000).

 Daily Traffic: 16,000 to 33,000
 Speed Limit: 40 to 45 MPH
 Vehicles per day


 2018-2022 Crashes: 1,000 (263/mi) Number of Lanes: 4 continuous
 travel lanes, with some turn lanes at
 Fatal and Serious Injury: 26
 intersections
 Other Crashes: 974

 Key Crash Types High Injury Network Modes



 Angle Crashes


 Pedestrian Bike Vehicle


Safety Analysis and Strategies
 Potential Strategies
A disproportionate share of crashes • Evaluate and improve access management along the corridor to limit
involved angle crashes left turn opportunities with the installation of a median
 • Sight distance improvement and Enhanced Delineation for Horizontal
 Curves
 • Study traffic signal timing
A disproportionate share of crashes • Reduce the speed limit and evaluate engineering measures to reduce
involved people walking target speeds through lane narrowing, speed feedback signs and
 traffic calming measures
 • Signalization, roundabouts, and median and pedestrian refuge
 islands
 • Enhance the visibility of pedestrian crossings and reduce exposure
 for people crossing
A disproportionate share of crashes
occurred at intersections • Yellow change intervals
 • Reduced left-turn conflict interactions



44 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Potential Safety Countermeasures - West Wedington Drive




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 45
South School Avenue
Between Nelson Hackett Boulevard to West 22nd Street/West Cato Springs Road (1.2 miles)

Context

This principal arterial road has four lanes, a two-way turn lane, and sidewalks or sidepaths on both sides north of
the West 15th Street intersection. South of West 15th Street, down to West Cato Springs Road, there’s only a sidewalk
on the east side of the corridor. Razorback Transit’s Route 20 runs along the entire corridor, which is lined mainly by
medium-scale businesses and residential areas. The University of Arkansas Engineering Research Center is located
on the south end of the corridor. Additionally, the Town Branch Trail and Frisco Trail connect this corridor to the city’s
larger trail network, including the Razorback Greenway Trail.

 Daily Traffic: 14,000 to 17,000
 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
 Vehicles per day


 2018-2022 Crashes: 134 (112/mi) Number of Lanes: 4 continuous travel
 lanes, with two-way turn lanes
 Fatal and Serious Injury: 3
 Other Crashes: 131


 Key Crash Types High Injury Network Modes



 Angle Crashes


 Pedestrian Bike Vehicle


Safety Analysis and Strategies
 Potential Strategies
A disproportionate share of crashes • Evaluate and improve access management along the corridor to limit
involved angle crashes left turn opportunities with the installation of a median
 • Sight distance improvement
 • Study traffic signal timing
A disproportionate share of crashes • Reduce the speed limit and evaluate engineering measures to reduce
involved people walking target speeds through a road diet with three vehicle lanes, lane
 narrowing, on-street parking, and other traffic calming measures
 • Install median and pedestrian refuge islands, walkways, and
 protected on-street bicycle lanes
 • Enhance the visibility of pedestrian crossings and reduce exposure
 for people crossing, including protected intersection treatments
A disproportionate share of crashes • Yellow change intervals and Backplates with Retroreflective Borders
occurred at intersections • Reduced left-turn conflict interactions and provide for dedicated
 turns
 • Leading Pedestrian Interval and Roundabouts


46 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Potential Safety Countermeasures - South School Avenue




 5. Implementation and Accountability | 47
Sharing Responsibility for Vision Zero
Following the regional adoption of the Northwest Capital Improvements
Arkansas Regional Vision Zero Plan in 2023, with a
 Large scale projects require significant planning and
target of eliminating the most serious crashes by
 resource allocation, with longer development timelines.
2038, Fayetteville passed a resolution adopting the
 Due to their impact and scale, these projects are
goals of the regional safety action plan. This included
 typically identified in city, regional, and state long-
committing to an even more aggressive timeline for
 range and capital improvement plans (CIP). These
the elimination of fatal and serious injury roadways
 plans range from 5-year to 20-year horizons and are
crashes in the city by 2030. This local Comprehensive
 updated annually to refine priorities and costs. Funding
Safety Action Plan is intended to supplement those
 may come from annual capital improvement budgets,
recommendations and further support Fayetteville in
 infrastructure bond initiatives, and major federal and
improving transportation safety across the city.
 state grant programs.
To carry out everything presented in this Vision Zero
Plan and to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries on Resurfacing, Maintenance, and Utility Work
Fayetteville roadways, everyone—from elected officials As infrastructure ages, routine maintenance,
and municipal staff to local employers and residents of resurfacing, and utility expansion needs, particularly
all ages and abilities—will need to take action. We all at the corridor level, present opportunities to rethink
have a personal responsibility to make the right choices street design while changes are already being made.
and to communicate the importance of why roadway Agency staff should work to coordinate maintenance
safety matters—making the region’s efforts even more and utility investments along HIN roadways and
effective. include transportation safety strategies included in
 the Fayetteville SAP. Agency staff may also pursue
Funding and Project Delivery innovative fundings sources, for example, state water
 infrastructure grants, to supplement annual public
Building a safer transportation system and roadway infrastructure budgets.
network in Fayetteville is an ongoing effort that should
be incorporated into each strategy and tool the city Local and Private Development
uses to plan, design, and implement changes to the Ongoing growth in Fayetteville means that land across
multimodal system. The Fayetteville Safety Action Plan the city is regularly being developed or redeveloped
identifies strategies for incorporating a Safe System to provide additional services, housing, employment
Approach into decision-making at various levels to opportunities, and more. With those investments, new
achieve the city’s ambitious goal of eliminating fatalities streets and created and existing streets are changed
and serious injuries on our streets. to meet the multimodal needs of the community.
All infrastructure projects, whether major capital Development projects present additional opportunities
investments by the city or ARDOT, maintenance to implement safety strategies and designs that
programs such as resurfacing, or investments from help the city meet its Vision Zero goals. The NWA
the private sector in development and community Regional Complete Streets Guide offers specific
programs, are opportunities to implement safety recommendations for how development projects can
improvements. It is incumbent upon the city to support transportation needs and improve safety,
continuously plan and develop a pipeline of projects and mobility, and accessibility for the community. Dedication
programs to address the diverse transportation safety of public infrastructure, development fees, right-of-way
needs of the community. Some examples of project dedication, and in some cases fee-in-lieu payments are
types and potential funding resources include: all ways to support safer streets and transportation
 facilities.




48 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
Community Response and Additional Programming conducting safety audits of severe crash locations,
Although many projects are planned years in advance, reviewing community safety requests, and reporting on
there will always be a need for implementation successes and challenges. In addition to city, regional,
funding and mechanisms to respond to community and state agencies focused on transportation safety,
needs with a sense of urgency. These needs may be each of the following bodies or organizations should be
expressed through request for traffic calming or speed considered for their role in working toward eliminating
management, a sudden shift in connectivity or traffic deaths and serious injuries on our streets.
due to new developments, or desires to update or add
 • City Council Transportation Committee
connections between amenities and neighborhood
destinations. Fayetteville staff are often at the forefront • Active Transportation Advisory Committee
of leading projects and programs that respond to • Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
community needs and desires and should be supported • Planning Commission
by city leadership. Community-responsive projects
are also a unique opportunity to involve community In alignment with the recommended Action Strategies
partners, including the business and philanthropic in the Fayetteville SAP, the city should consider the
communities, and to connect residents with established formation of a cross-disciplinary committee or working
outlets for citizen participation. group to addressing multimodal safety needs in the city.
 This could take the form of a road safety committee,
Innovative Funding Approaches active transportation advisory committee, or similar
Fayetteville has well-established funding mechanisms body bringing technical staff, elected officials, and
at the local level, and regularly accesses state and residents together for collaboration.
federal grant funding to support its transportation
infrastructure needs. There are opportunities both Advocates and Partners
within established funding sources and through
 Northwest Arkansas is home to a number of community
creative approaches and partnerships outside typical
 service organizations working to ensure the region and
transportation programs, to meet the scope and scale
 its communities are welcoming, safe, and supportive
of safety needs in the community. For example, grant
 of the region’s growing population and diverse needs.
programs focused on environmental and pollution-
 While transportation safety touches some element
related goals, such as the USEPA Climate Pollution
 of nearly all efforts, there are also local and regional
Reduction Grant program, have successfully supported
 organizations focused directly on transportation and
active transportation and other objectives in Northwest
 mobility needs. Local bicycle, trail, and running clubs
Arkansas and across the state. Emergency services and
 are often involved in supporting safe streets, as are
law enforcement agencies may have access to funding
 many parent-teacher and other school-based groups.
to support safety programming and education, and can
be partners on SS4A and similar projects to align safe Two such groups with a history of supporting active
road design with emergency response needs. transportation safety and mobility needs in the region
 are:

Boards and Commissions Trailblazers
City boards, commissions, and advisory committees For nearly two decades, Trailblazers have led the
can play a powerful role in identifying safety needs, development of the region’s paved trail network and
aligning plans and infrastructure investments, and supported active transportation infrastructure in
engaging with the community on education, outreach, general. Trailblazers’ Adult First Ride program focuses
and measuring progress toward Vision Zero goals. The on supporting new riders interested in bicycling for
Fayetteville SAP includes recommendations for how city transportation, recreation, and other purposes in
leadership and staff can work collaboratively across a supportive, judgment free learning environment.
agencies and departments. It also details ways for the You can learn more about their work at www.
city to engage partners and community members to wearetrailblazers.org.
understand transportation safety needs by, for example,


 5. Implementation and Accountability | 49
Pedal It Forward • Safe System Alignment: Coordinate traffic
 management efforts between the city and university
Pedal It Forward works in partnership with local
 to support shared Vision Zero goals.
organizations to collect, refurbish, and distribute free or
low-cost bicycles to those who can’t afford them. Their • Community Engagement: Engage students and staff
Pedal Partners program works with schools, veterans in education and outreach campaigns to build culture
groups, mental health clinics, youth organizations, of safety both on and off campus.
and any organizations that connect with low-income • Policy Coordination: Align university parking and
people and communities to distribute bicycles through transportation demand management policies with
trusted community partners. Learn more at www. citywide mobility strategies.
pedalitforward.org. • Transit and Multimodal Access: Strengthen
Fayetteville also has unique partnerships with collaboration with Razorback Transit to improve
large educational institutions that are addressing transit service and multimodal access along Vision
transportation safety and mobility needs. Through Zero corridors.
the University of Arkansas, Razorback Transit plays
a vital role in the city’s transportation network and
is actively involved in improving safety, mobility, Evaluation
and accessibility for both students and the general Fayetteville should continue to collaborate with the
public. Fayetteville Public Schools are another critical NWARPC and neighboring communities to monitor the
partner in addressing safety for school-aged children success of individual Vision Zero actions related to
and their families, through the join Safe Routes
 goals included in this and the regional Vision Zero SAP.
to School planning effort with the city. These and
 Evaluation and regular reporting are essential for the
other institutions have an important role in ensuring
 data-driven approach to Vision Zero. There must be
the elimination of deaths and serious injuries on
 accountability to the commitment of eliminating traffic
Fayetteville streets.
 deaths and severe injuries. If certain actions are not
 successful, not moving fast enough, or not working
University of Arkansas Integration for another reason, the region and member agencies
As a major institutional anchor in Fayetteville, the should assess and modify actions as needed. However,
University of Arkansas plays a central role in shaping it is critical that monitoring does not reduce or minimize
local transportation patterns. The university’s dense the focus on the ultimate performance measure of
population of students, staff, and visitors contributes eliminating fatal and serious injuries on all roadways
significantly to travel demand, especially in areas in Fayetteville by 2030. Actions such as the data
surrounding campus. The University of Arkansas dashboard and annual reporting can track progress and
provides a clear framework for enhancing campus provide insight into a number of metrics, including but
mobility and safety through policy, data, and not limited to:
infrastructure improvements. The University operates
 • Crashes involving bicycles and pedestrians
Razorback Transit, providing public bus service across
 • Crashes resulting from unsafe speeds
Fayetteville for students and residents alike. Integrating
this plan into the city’s Vision Zero strategy can help • Crashes in rural versus urbanized areas
address key safety concerns near and around the • Crashes occurring on roadways in Areas
university. of Persistent Poverty or other underserved
Key opportunities for integration include: communities
 • Safety improvements on HIN corridors
 • High-Injury Network (HIN) Refinement: Leverage
 university crash data and pedestrian volumes to • Number of intersection safety improvements
 refine high-injury network segments near campus.
 • Focus on Vulnerable Users: Use the Univesity’s
 pedestrian and bicycle safety programs to guide
 citywide efforts aimed at protecting people walking
 and biking.


50 | FAYETTEVILLE VISION ZERO PLAN
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
E Center St, Fayetteville, AR
 NWA Regional
 VISION
 ZERO
Safety Action Plan
 Transportation Committee Memo
 2026-1636

Meeting of April 28, 2026
To: Transportation Committee
Thru:
From: Chris Brown, Public Works Director
Subject:
 A Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Agreement with the University of
 Arkansas Establishing Maintenance Responsibilities on Certain Roadways Through
 University of Arkansas Properties


Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of a Resolution approving a Memorandum of Agreement to establish maintenance
responsibilities of streets through the University of Arkansas campus and adjacent to other University of
Arkansas properties. A recommendation from the Committee to the City Council is requested.
Background:
For several years, the University of Arkansas expressed interest in using their property frontages along public
streets for additional landscaping, extended areas of Senior Walk, and other enhancement. City and University
staff collaborated to identify a mechanism by which to do this that protected the interests of both institutions,
culminating in a conditionally approved right-of-way vacation that was approved by City Council in 2023
(Ordinance 6640; attached). This ordinance encompasses 6.54 acres of right-of-way to be vacated along
seven streets adjoining the main University of Arkansas campus and its satellite arts district. None of the 18
portions of right-of-way include vehicle driving lanes. In-turn, the University proposes dedication of right-of-way
along with utility easements to protect existing facilities. Among the remaining conditions, perhaps the most
prominent is the requirement for a formal agreement between the City and University, enshrining assurances
of pedestrian access and clear delineation of responsibility for maintenance and repairs.
Discussion:
Following approval of Ordinance 6640, City and University staff developed a Memorandum of Agreement
(MOA) to enshrine the right-off-way vacation’s conditions. The MOA was approved by the University’s Board of
Trustees with the final approval steps by the City and execution of signatures pending Council approval.
Budget/Staff Impact:
None
Attachments: MOA City of Fayetteville UA Right of Way and Maintenance Agreement, Ordinance 6640 - UA
adjancent ROW VAC, UA Board Approval - City of Fayetteville MOA 112 Maintenance




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
 BY AND BETWEEN
 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, ACTING FOR AND
 ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE
 AND
 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS

 REGARDING

 CONDITIONS OF VACATION OF VARIOUS RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND THE
 RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE ONGOING MAINTENANCE
 OF ROADWAYS THROUGH THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS,
 AND FOR OTHER PROPERTIES AS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES


 WHEREAS, the University of Arkansas (the University) is located within the city limits
of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (the City) and the City has certain streets that pass through
the state-owned property of the University; and

 WHEREAS, the City has been granted ownership of the Rights of Way (ROW) of these
streets which once were the property of the State of Arkansas, in the form of highways managed
by ARDOT; and

 WHEREAS, the City and the University have determined that it is in the best interest of
both parties and the constituencies they respectively represent to transfer ownership of specific
portions of said ROW from the City to the University; and

 WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under A.C.A. § 14-54-104 to vacate
public grounds or portions thereof which are not required for corporate purposes; and

 WHEREAS, the City and the University have jointly executed the required official legal
documents required to make such ROW transfers, such that the City generally owns the ROW
encompassing the street width from the back-of-curb to back-of-curb for the designated streets;
and the University owns the land beginning at the back-of-curb, it then being a continuous part
of the University’s adjacent property; and

 WHEREAS the City and the University wish to designate the maintenance
responsibilities for all land areas, surface and sub-surface infrastructures, landscape and grounds,
and other appurtenances, collectively referred to as facilities, of the University and the City
respectively in such transferred ROW areas; and,

 WHEREAS the City and the University wish to execute all necessary associated utility
easements, as required to maintain said facilities, both public and private; and




 1
 WHEREAS the City and the University agree to provide in the agreement assurances for
pedestrian access to sidewalks of the University in the vacated areas; and

 NOW THEREFORE, the City and the University agree to the following conditions and
responsibilities under this agreement, for the designated areas shown on the attached and
referenced exhibits:


I. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
 a. The University agrees by execution of this MOU with the City, to accommodate use
 by the general public of the sidewalks that are located on the subject University
 property for pedestrian traffic, to be used in compliance with applicable law and
 policies of the University. The University may temporarily close or otherwise manage
 access for safety, construction, repair, or maintenance purposes.


II. EASEMENTS FOR FACILITIES
 a. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right-of-
 way vacation request, with review and coordination by the University, the City, and
 the utility provider, including properly identifying utilities in the field by means of
 surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with utility representatives.
 b. Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right-of-way, or an easement be
 dedicated over the areas where poles and appurtenances are located.
 c. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
 d. For the installation of future utilities, the University and the City agree to work
 cooperatively to provide reasonable and necessary access to utility providers.


III. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY.
 a. Within the City ROW, the city shall be responsible for maintaining the street paving,
 curbs and gutters, storm and drainage structures, traffic and crosswalk signals and
 control cabinets, street markings and all other hardscape or road elements, unless
 specifically identified as a responsibility of the University elsewhere in the MOU.
 b. Outside City ROW, the City shall be responsible for repairs to features behind the
 curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any City facilities located within
 vacated rights of way, including drainage facilities and water/sewer lines, where a
 utility easement has been granted to the City from the University. The City shall be
 financially responsible for restoration of disturbed hardscape and landscape only to
 the extent the repairs are consistent with the standard of care for other City Streets.
 The University shall be responsible for any enhanced landscape or hardscape above
 that which is typical for the City in other similar instances.
 c. The City shall not be responsible for the maintenance of landscape, trees and
 irrigation systems, located in the street medians, unless specifically noted below.




 2
 d. For other site improvements located outside the City ROW, or not contained in a
 dedicated City easement, the City will not be responsible for maintenance or repair of
 anything except a standard sidewalk, as defined in City engineering standards for a
 Master Plan Street Section of the same classification. Where repairs require specialty
 hardscape materials (e.g. Senior Walk, specialty pavers, specialty signage) desired by
 the University, restoration shall be as mutually agreed by the City and University; but
 the City will be responsible for only the cost of City standard hardscape materials as
 specified by the design standards shown in the Master Plan Street Sections. Any
 damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the expense of those creating
 the need for the maintenance or repair.



IV. MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE UNIVERSITY
 a. For the streets noted below, the maintenance responsibility of the University within
 the City ROW will be primarily related to landscape elements, associated with ground
 cover, trees and irrigation.
 b. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, maintenance responsibility of the University does
 not include hardscape or road elements located in City ROW, such as curb and gutter,
 drainage infrastructure, paving, traffic and crosswalk signals and equipment, street
 markings, and standard traffic control signage; all of which are the responsibility of
 City. University specialty monument signage is not the responsibility of the City,
 whether in City ROW or not.
 c. Scope of Maintenance Services to be provided by the University:
 1) Maintenance of turf grass:
 a) Mowing, chemical treatment
 b) Periodic edging and weed string trimming
 2) Maintenance of trees:
 a) Pruning as required
 b) Replacement when necessary
 c) Installation, pruning, and replacement will be coordinated such that
 signage elements maintained by the City are not obscured, and that
 sight distance standards are upheld.
 3) Irrigation systems where applicable:
 a) Backflow device maintenance
 b) Drip irrigation for trees
 c) Turf irrigation where applicable
 d) Utility costs for irrigation
 4) Crosswalk striping and pedestrian enhancements (RRFB’s, in pavement
 lighting, and the like) at non-signalized pedestrian crossings.




 3
V. ROADWAYS AND STREETS SUBJECT TO THIS AGREEMENT
 The following street designations are subject to this MOU and the conditions stated
 herein. The complete ROW documents and legal descriptions are included in the
 referenced ATTACHMENT 1, which describes all three (3) Vacation Map sections.

 This list may be modified or amended over time as the need arises between the
 parties.
 a. The street sections generally identified below are shown in the Vacation Maps and
 are identified in the EXHIBITS, shall be subject to the specific requirements noted in
 the Agreement:

 1) SOUTH RAZORBACK ROAD
 a) RAZORBACK ROAD - Martin Luther King Blvd to W Hotz
 Drive

 2) MAPLE HILL BLOCK
 a) RAZORBACK ROAD – W Hotz Drive to Cleveland Ave
 b) CLEVELAND AVE - Razorback Road to Lindell Ave
 c) MAPLE STREET - Razorback Road to Garland Ave
 d) GARLAND AVE - Maple Street to Cleveland Ave

 3) ART AND DESIGN DISTRICT
 a) MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD – Hill Ave to LeRoy Pond
 Dr
 b) HILL AVE – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South Property
 Boundary
 c) LEROY POND DR. – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South
 Property Boundary

VI. MINOR PHYSICAL MODIFICATIONS

 The University and the City jointly and independently reserve the right to make
 limited reasonable modifications to the University maintained areas at their own cost,
 as needed to maintain safety of the roadways, accommodate changing site conditions
 and to preserve the ability to maintain the areas. Each party shall notify the other prior
 to making such modifications and the basis for the need for the modification by
 contacting Facilities Management with the University and the Office of the City
 Engineer with the City.




11313


 4
VII. DURATION

 This Agreement will only expire if both the University and the City consent to its
 termination in writing.

VIII. TRANSFER

 This Agreement shall not be transferable unless approved in writing by the City of
 Fayetteville, and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas.

IX. AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

 FAILURE TO PERFORM: Should either of the signatories to this Agreement believe
 that the terms of this Agreement are not being met, or cannot be met, that party shall
 immediately notify the other signatories and request consultation to amend this
 Agreement. The parties agree to act in good faith to resolve any issues incurred over
 the term of the Agreement, consistent with any applicable laws, codes or ordinances,
 and with accepted professional engineering practice.

 CHANGES TO THE AGREEMENT: Over time, it is expected that there will be the
 need to change ROW designations, add additional streets and ROW to the agreement,
 or remove areas currently in the Agreement. Should this need arise over the life of the
 Agreement, the signatories to this Agreement shall notify the other signatories and
 request consultation to amend this Agreement. The parties agree to act in good faith
 to resolve any issues incurred over the term of the Agreement, consistent with any
 applicable laws, codes or ordinances, and with accepted professional engineering
 practice. The process to amend this Agreement shall be conducted in a manner similar
 to that leading to the execution of this Agreement.

X. TERMINATING THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

 This Agreement shall not be terminated except by the authorized respective
 representatives of the City of Fayetteville, and the Board of Trustees of the University
 of Arkansas.

XI. COUNTERPARTS AND SIGNATURES

 This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be
 considered one and the same document. The parties agree that copies of faxed or PDF
 copies of the signature pages shall be deemed a valid and binding upon each of them.

XII. GOVERNING LAW

 This Agreement shall be governed and construed under the laws of the State of
 Arkansas without regard to its choice of law principles. By entering into this
 Agreement, neither the City, nor the University, waive any immunities to suit that are
 or may be available to it or its respective officials, trustees, representatives or
 employees.


 5
 SIGNATORIES

 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, ACTING FOR AND ON
 BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS, FAYETTEVILLE


_______________________ ___________________________
Name: (Date)
Title:


 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS

 ATTEST:

_______________________ ___________________________
Mayor Molly Rawn Kara Paxton, City Clerk-Treasurer
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Date




 6
 ATTACHMENT 1
 City of Fayetteville Ordinance


ATTACHMENT 1 COF ROW Legal Description
 13 Pages


ATTACHMENT 2 City Council Memo 554a0814-ec2e-4eaa-8dfe-
 054e8045c030
 2 Pages


ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance f638f531-efa7-4921-bca5-84f7aefb3b3c
 2 Pages


ATTACHMENT 4 COF ROW Vacation - AREA OVERVIEW MAP
 1 page




 7
8
 EXHIBIT 'B'
 VAC-2022-0024

ROW Vacation Description
#1
Part of the NE1/4 NW1/4 of Section 21, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 NW1/4; Thence S 60°00'27" E, a
distance of 525.14 feet to the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 02°40'45" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Hill
Avenue, a distance of 36.68 feet; Thence S 82°20'08" W, a distance of 11.08 feet to a
point on the Easterly back of curb line of Hill Avenue; Thence N 02°52'05" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 36.70 feet; Thence N 82°20'08" E, a
distance of 10.96 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.01 acres more or less.


#2
Part of the NE1/4 NW1/4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 NW1/4; Thence S 64°05'15" E, a
distance of 507.77 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the
Point of Beginning; Thence S 82°20'08" W, a distance of 10.82 feet to a point on the
Easterly back of curb line of said Hill Avenue; Thence N 02°52'05" E along the said
Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 132.06 feet; Thence N 02°41'12" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 362.61 feet; Thence S 87°10'32" E, a
distance of 6.48 feet to the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue the following three courses: S
02°32'37" W, a distance of 184.79 feet; S 01°43'05" W, a distance of 193.23 feet; S
02°40'45" W, a distance of 114.72 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.09 acres
more or less.
#3
Part of the SE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 16, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NW corner of the NE1/4 NW1/4 of Section 21. Thence N 68°47'51"
E, a distance of 718.90 feet to a point of the Southerly right of way line of M.L.K. JR
Boulevard; Thence S 86°32'38" E, a distance of 277.65 feet to a point on the Southerly
right of way line of M.L.K. JR Boulevard; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
M.L.K. JR Boulevard the following three courses: S 03°27'22" W, a distance of 10.00


 9
feet; N 86°32'38" W, a distance of 277.52 feet; N 02°42'49" E, a distance of 10.00 feet
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.06 acres more or less.


#4
Part of the NE1/4 NW1/4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 NW1/4; Thence N 77°59'30" E, a
distance of 1124.85 feet the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of M.L.K. JR
Boulevard and the Westerly right of way line of Government Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 86°32'38" E, a distance of 8.00 feet to a point on the Westerly
back of curb line of said Government Avenue; Thence S 02°28'13" W along the said
Westerly back of curb line, a distance of 370.23 feet; Thence S 82°19'51" W, a distance
of 19.56 feet to the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue the following three
courses: N 02°31'09" E, a distance of 208.36 feet; S 87°04'21" E, a distance of 11.07
feet; N 02°28'13" E, a distance of 165.53 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.13
acres more or less.


#5
Part of the SE1/4 of Section 8 and part of the NE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 17 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SE corner of said Section 8; Thence N 02°53'25" E along the East
line of said Section 8, a distance of 1260.95 feet; Thence N 87°09'15" W, a distance of
117.56 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the Point
of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street the
following bearings and distances: N 87°09'15" W, a distance of 478.83 feet; N
02°50'45" E, a distance of 12.44 feet; N 87°09'15" W, a distance of 715.54 feet to a
point on the proposed Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street; Thence along
the Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street the following bearings and
distance: Northeasterly along a 29.50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle
of 57°21’17", for a distance of 29.53 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
63°53’14" E, and distance of 28.31 feet; S 87°26'07" E, a distance of 805.77 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the right; Southeasterly along a 5.00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90°00'00", for a distance of 7.85 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of S 42°26'07" E, and distance of 7.07 feet; S 02°33'53" W, a distance
of 6.83 feet; S 87°26'07" E, a distance of 386.19 feet to the beginning of a circular curve



 10
to the right, said point being at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb line of said
Clevland Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along
the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: Southeasterly along a 37.50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central
angle of 89°49'41", for a distance of 58.79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S
42°31'16" E, and distance of 52.95 feet; Thence S 02°23'34" W, a distance of 736.30
feet; Thence S 03°10'11" W, a distance of 391.26 feet; Thence S 03°10'11" W, a
distance of 61.13 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly back of curb
line of West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 39.50 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89°20'08", for a distance of 61.59 feet,
said curve having a chord bearing of S 47°50'15" W, and distance of 55.54 feet; N
87°29'41" W, a distance of 1184.55 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right
at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback road the following bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a
30.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89°59'12", for a distance of
47.12 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 42°30'05" W, and distance of 42.42
feet; N 02°29'30" E, a distance of 20.32 feet; Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback Road and along the Northerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distance: S 87°16'56" E, a distance of 36.71
feet; S 32°16'27" E, a distance of 12.21 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 15.00 feet; S
85°50'33" E, a distance of 196.14 feet; S 86°17'43" E, a distance of 367.01 feet; N
58°48'06" E, a distance of 43.32 feet; S 87°56'08" E, a distance of 61.00 feet; S
53°43'12" E, a distance of 30.23 feet; S 87°56'08" E, a distance of 15.00 feet; S
02°03'52" W, a distance of 10.00 feet; S 87°56'08" E, a distance of 128.00 feet; S
80°44'15" E, a distance of 27.21 feet; S 87°49'55" E, a distance of 27.57 feet; N
02°03'52" E, a distance of 10.46 feet; S 87°56'08" E, a distance of 141.43 feet; S
78°00'34" E, a distance of 29.74 feet; S 87°43'15" E, a distance of 93.43 feet to the
intersection of the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly
right of way line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 51°46'34" E, a distance of
53.54 feet; N 08°37'03" E, a distance of 7.95 feet; N 03°14'28" E, a distance of 238.68
feet; N 41°45'32" W, a distance of 6.15 feet; N 03°14'28" E, a distance of 77.00 feet; N
48°14'28" E, a distance of 6.15 feet; N 03°14'28" E, a distance of 136.61 feet; N
02°31'16" E, a distance of 701.38 feet; N 58°12'33" W, a distance of 51.84 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 1.67 Acres more or less.

#6

Part of the SW1/4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:




 11
Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 74°45'30" E, a distance of
95.94 feet to a point lying on the Northerly right of way line of West Maple Street and
the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03°06'30" W, a distance of 9.11 feet to the intersection
of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the Easterly back of
curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said
Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 86°53'30" W, a distance of
36.05 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Northwesterly along a 39.50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90°03'41", for a distance of 62.09
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 41°51'40" W, and distance of 55.89 feet; N
03°10'11" E, a distance of 65.85 feet; N 03°10'11" E, a distance of 381.32 feet; N
02°23'34" E, a distance of 10.44 feet; Northeasterly along a 19.50 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 51°14'11", for a distance of 17.44 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of N 28°00'40" E, and distance of 16.86 feet; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and along the Easterly right of way
line of said Garland Avenue, S 02°53'25" W, a distance of 465.30 feet to the intersection
of the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly right of way
line of aforesaid West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly right of way line of said
West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: S 42°55'49" E, a distance of
43.49 feet; S 74°15'21" E, a distance of 35.89 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing
0.12 Acres more or less.

#7

Part of the SW1/4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 02°53'25" E along the West
line of said Section 9, a distance of 1297.88 feet; Thence S 87°06'35" E, a distance of
44.78 feet to the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the
Easterly right of way line of Garland Avenue and the Point of Beginning; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: S 48°20'03" W, a distance of 27.69 feet; S 02°53'40" W, a distance of 707.66
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly
back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 19.50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
52°26'46", for a distance of 17.85 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23°49'49"
W, and distance of 17.23 feet; N 02°23'34" E, a distance of 250.85 feet; Thence leaving
the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue N 02°23'34" E, a distance of
209.31 feet to a point on the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence
N 02°23'34" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue, a distance
of 229.09 feet to the intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland
Avenue and the Southerly back of curb line of aforesaid Clevland Street and the
beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
said Clevland Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 31.50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 91°00'58", for a distance of 50.04
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 47°54'03" E, and distance of 44.94 feet; S
86°35'28" E, a distance of 276.96 feet; Thence leaving the Southerly back of curb line of



 12
said Clevland Street, S 02°53'25" W, a distance of 6.72 feet to a point lying on the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street; Thence N 87°07'28" W along the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street, a distance of 275.22 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0.24 Acres more or less.



#8
Part of the NE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of said Section 17; Thence S 02°41'08" W along the East
line of said Section 17, a distance of 44.57 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of
way line of West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly
right of way line of said West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: N
87°56'08" W, a distance of 529.41 feet; S 02°03'52" W, a distance of 10.00 feet; N
87°56'08" W, a distance of 45.09 feet; S 29°02'41" W, a distance of 50.50 feet; S
79°37'29" W, a distance of 17.72 feet to the Easterly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence N 02°37'28" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive, a
distance of 49.69 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive and the Southerly back of curb
line of West maple Street; Thence along the Southerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30.00 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89°52'51", for a distance of 47.06 feet,
said curve having a chord bearing of N 47°33'53" E, and distance of 42.38 feet; S
87°29'41" E, a distance of 584.19 feet; S 02°41'08" W, a distance of 16.09 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 0.31 Acres more or less.

#9
Part of the NE1/4 NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°43'18" W along the
West line of said NE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 309.18 feet; Thence S 87°16'42" E, a
distance of 23.76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence N 02°58'57" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road, a distance of 160.23 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the
intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Southerly
back of curb line of West Maple Street; Thence Northeasterly along the Southerly back
of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 100.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 89°31'22", for a distance of 156.25 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 47°44'38" E, and distance of 140.83 feet; Thence S 87°29'41" E along the
Southerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 514.79 feet to the



 13
beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb
line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence Southeasterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive along
a 30.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90°07'09", for a distance of
47.19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42°26'07" E, and distance of 42.47
feet; Thence S 02°37'28" W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive,
a distance of 57.35 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street
the following bearings and distances: S 79°37'29" W, a distance of 17.02 feet; N
43°37'28" W, a distance of 44.19 feet; N 43°37'28" W, a distance of 22.24 feet; N
54°03'02" W, a distance of 48.45 feet; N 85°43'19" W, a distance of 137.52 feet; N
71°49'55" W, a distance of 7.76 feet; N 86°45'54" W, a distance of 94.00 feet; S
03°14'11" W, a distance of 14.50 feet; N 86°45'49" W, a distance of 26.00 feet;
Thence N 03°14'11" E, a distance of 14.50 feet; N 86°45'50" W, a distance of 178.59
feet; S 54°43'02" W, a distance of 69.92 feet; S 36°42'58" W, a distance of 24.53 feet to
the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence S 02°43'04" W along the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 168.40 feet; Thence S
57°28'29" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
34.08 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.43 Acres more or less.


#10
Part of the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 SE1/4; Thence S 02°43'27" W along
the West line of said NE1/4 SE1/4, a distance of 401.69 feet; Thence S 88°04'02" E, a
distance of 19.28 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 88°04'02" E, a distance of
26.98 feet; S 02°34'31" W, a distance of 474.04 feet; S 47°17'49" E, a distance of 35.62
feet; S 07°31'38" W, a distance of 17.21 feet to a point lying on the Northerly back of
curb line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence N 87°28'31" W along the Northerly back of
curb line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 17.76 feet to the beginning of a
circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said
Nolan Richardson Drive and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a 29.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 90°07'05", for a distance of 45.61 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 42°24'59" W, and distance of 41.05 feet; N 02°38’34" E, a distance of
84.03 feet; N 02°30'46" E, a distance of 51.67 feet; N 00°20'35" E, a distance of 158.49
feet; N 02°30'46" E, a distance of 132.04 feet; N 02°54'25" E, a distance of 58.72 feet to
the Point of Beginning, containing 0.30 Acres more or less.




 14
#11
Part of the NE1/4 SE1/4 and part of the SE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North,
Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 SE1/4; Thence S 02°43'27" W along
the West line of the said NE1/4 SE1/4, a distance of 990.51 feet; Thence S 87°16’33" E,
a distance of 41.41 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02°37'57" W, a distance of
191.59 feet; S 02°37'57" W, a distance of 503.00 feet; S 32°48'03" E, a distance of
15.96 feet; S 02°37'57" W, a distance of 40.50 feet; N 87°22'03" W, a distance of 8.46
feet; S 02°32'57" W, a distance of 201.50 feet; S 02°46'05" W, a distance of 308.48 feet;
S 87°22'03" E, a distance of 9.23 feet; S 04°29'42" E, a distance of 54.63 feet; S
45°45'33" E, a distance of 15.96 feet; S 76°34'38" E, a distance of 36.68 feet; Thence S
88°32'28" W, a distance of 64.27 feet to the to the Easterly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 40.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
51°46'46", for a distance of 36.15 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23°14’49"
W, and distance of 34.93 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance of 245.78 feet; N 00°39'11" E,
a distance of 172.82 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance of 113.63; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02°38'34" E, a distance of 86.00
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road; Thence N 02°38'34" E
along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 35.14 feet;
Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02°38'34" E, a
distance of 157.12 feet to a the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: N 02°38'34" E, a distance of 215.84; N 04°46'38" E, a distance
of 161.08 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance of 125.51 feet to the beginning of a circular
curve to the right; Northeasterly along a 34.50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a
central angle of 89°52'55", for a distance of 54.12 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 47°35'01" E, and distance of 48.74 feet; S 87°28'31" E, a distance of 4.65
feet; Thence S 02°31'29" W, a distance of 17.24 feet to a point lying on the Southerly
right of way line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence S 44°34'24" W along the Southerly
right of way line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 36.39 feet to the Point of
Beginning, containing 0.64 Acres more or less.
#12
Part of the NW1/4 SE1/4 and part of the SW1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16
North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:




 15
Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/4 SE1/4; Thence S 02°43’27" W, a
distance of 954.57 feet; Thence N 87°21'26" W, a distance of 48.50 feet to a point lying
on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and
distances: S 02°41'40" W, a distance of 885.85 feet; S 42°59'26" W, a distance of
26.15 feet; S 11°00'02" W, a distance of 60.47 feet; S 02°30'15" W, a distance of 30.08
feet; S 87°22'03" E, a distance of 31.00 feet; S 02°37'57" W, a distance of 240.00 feet;
S 07°12'24" W, a distance of 75.24 feet; S 00°52'46" E, a distance of 13.61 feet; S
15°10'00" W, a distance of 23.86 feet; S 59°11'49" W, a distance of 60.93 feet; Thence
N 88°32'28" E, a distance of 65.11 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 39.50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 43°02'25", for a distance of 29.67 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of N 24°09'42" E, and distance of 28.98 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance
of 256.33 feet; N 04°37'56" E, a distance of 172.82 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance of
607.73 feet; N 00°30'29" E, a distance of 161.08 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance of
126.25 feet; Northwesterly along a 33.50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central
angle of 49°41'15", for a distance of 29.05 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
22°12'04" W, and distance of 28.15 feet; Thence N 87°28'31" W, a distance of 7.18 feet
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.76 Acres more or less.

#13
Part of the NW1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°43'27" W along
the East line of the said NW1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 43.47 feet; Thence N 87°16'33" W,
a distance of 30.92 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02°05'15" W, a distance of
192.55 feet; S 02°56'28" W, a distance of 171.14 feet; S 02°56'28" W, a distance of
52.91 feet; N 87°22'08" W, a distance of 17.55 feet; S 02°37'57" W, a distance of 70.15
feet; Thence S 16°40'05" W, a distance of 28.86 feet; S 02°37'57" W, a distance of
82.00 feet; S 30°42'28" W, a distance of 17.53 feet; S 03°25'24" W, a distance of 50.00
feet; S 45°00'08" E, a distance of 21.57 feet; S 03°06'51" W, a distance of 163.01 feet;
S 09°06'16" W, a distance of 24.47 feet; Thence S 87°28'31" E, a distance of 8.84 feet
to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular
curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 29.50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 46°40'08", for a distance of 24.03 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of N 25°58'38" E, and distance of 23.37 feet; N 02°38'34" E, a distance
of 83.71 feet; N 02°30'46" E, a distance of 51.61 feet; N 04°40'57" E, a distance of
158.48 feet; N 02°30'46" E, a distance of 132.20 feet; N 02°54'25" E, a distance of
380.29 feet; N 00°22'40" W, a distance of 25.69 feet to a circular curve to the left;
Northwesterly along a 27.50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of



 16
23°19'03", for a distance of 11.19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 12°02'11"
W, and distance of 11.11 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.23 Acres more or
less.

#14
Part of the SW/4 NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°35'17" W along
the East line of the said SW1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 545.93 feet; Thence N 86°40’08"
W, a distance of 42.18 feet to the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: S 02°52'01" W, a distance of 302.22 feet; S
86°38'50" E, a distance of 3.21 feet; S 02°32'00" W, a distance of 179.59 feet to a point
on the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a
circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30.00 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 27°36'29", for a distance of 14.46 feet, said
curve having a chord bearing of N 16°31'19" E, and distance of 14.32 feet; N 02°43'04"
E, a distance of 9.68 feet; Thence leaving said Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and along the proposed Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: N 02°43'04" E, a distance of 85.06 feet; N
04°37’24" E, a distance of 214.63 feet; N 03°01’17" E, a distance of 140.19 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the left on the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road along a 29.50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
38°31’42", for a distance of 19.84 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 16°14’34"
W, and distance of 19.47 feet; Thence N 86°40'08" W, a distance of 7.97 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 0.11 Acres more or less.

#15
Part of the SW/4 NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°35'17" W along
the West line of the said SW1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 31.42 feet; Thence N 87°24'43" W,
a distance of 35.00 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way lien of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03°03'28" W along the Westerly right of way
line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 469.02 feet; Thence S 86°40'08" E, a
distance of 18.37 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the
beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of
said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 23.50
feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 34°00’59", for a distance of 13.95



 17
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 19°54’33" E, and distance of 13.75 feet; N
02°54'03" E, a distance of 417.63 feet; Thence N 02°40'22" E, a distance of 6.09 feet to
the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Northwesterly along a 35.50 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 65°48'22", for a distance of 40.77 feet, said
curve having a chord bearing of N 30°13'49" W, and distance of 38.57 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0.23 Acres more or less.
#16
Part of the NW/4 NE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°43'18" W along
the West line of the said NW1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 35.57 feet; Thence N 87°15'25" W,
a distance of 98.42 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02°43'04" W, a distance of
16.99 feet; S 87°16'56" E, a distance of 23.00 feet; S 48°06'31" E, a distance of 34.83
feet; S 02°59'34" E, a distance of 40.20 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 83.09 feet; S
32°43'04" W, a distance of 22.48 feet; S 55°46'02" E, a distance of 8.49 feet; S
02°43'04" W, a distance of 58.00 feet; N 87°16'56" W, a distance of 15.00 feet; S
02°43'04" W, a distance of 20.00 feet; S 22°17'57" E, a distance of 33.11 feet; S
08°25'42" W, a distance of 60.30 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 164.00 feet; S
62°53'17" W, a distance of 23.05 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 26.97 feet; N
87°16'56" W, a distance of 49.00 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 20.56 feet; S
87°16'56" E, a distance of 64.00 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 52.51 feet; S
87°08’22" E, a distance of 26.12 feet; S 02°46'31" W, a distance of 668.51 feet; Thence
S 87°12'53" E, a distance of 3.08 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback
Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back
of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly
along a 32.50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 63°06'05", for a
distance of 35.79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 34°13'24" E, and distance
of 34.01 feet; N 02°40'22" E, a distance of 507.98 feet; N 02°58'57" E, a distance of
647.83 feet; N 02°58'57" E, a distance of 88.90 feet to the beginning of a circular curve
to the left; Northwesterly along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle
of 90°09'00", for a distance of 47.20 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
42°05'33" W, and distance of 42.48 feet; N 87°10'03" W, a distance of 57.37 feet;
Thence S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 5.88 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0.97
Acres more or less.

#17
Part of the NW/4 NE1/4 of Section 17 and part of the SW1/4 SE1/4 of Section 8, all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:




 18
Beginning at a point that lies N 80°19'52" W, a distance of 83.78 feet from the SE corner
of the SW1/4 SE1/4 of said Section, said point lying on the Northerly right of way line of
West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence N 63°02'21" E along the
Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 57.24 feet; Thence S
87°16'56" E along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 17.73 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence S 02°48'54"
W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 13.28 feet
to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence Southwesterly along the
Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 30.00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90°01'03", for a distance of 47.13 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of S 47°49'25" W, and distance of 42.43 feet; Thence N
87°10'03" W along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 37.41 feet; Thence N 02°49'57" E, a distance of 14.81 feet to the Point of Beginning,
containing 0.05 Acres more or less.

#18

Part of the SE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 8, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the SW corner of said SE1/4 SE1/4; Thence N 29°38'05" E, a distance
of 51.01 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence N 02°19'02" E along the Easterly right of way of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 1214.34 feet to the intersection of the Easterly right of
way of said Razorback Road and the Southerly right of way line of Cleveland Street;
Thence N 87°09'15" W along the Southerly right of way line of said Cleveland Street, a
distance of 5.66 feet to the Easterly proposed back of curb line of Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly proposed back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 29.53 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 31°36'29", for a distance of 16.29 feet, said curve having a
chord bearing of S 19°23'53" W, and distance of 16.08 feet; S 02°52'26" W, a distance
of 171.46 feet; S 05°36'04" E, a distance of 51.06 feet to the Easterly back of curb line
of said Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: S 02°23'22" W, a distance of 497.62 feet; S
02°37'37" W, a distance of 479.33 feet; Thence S 87°16'56" E, a distance of 8.23 feet to
the Point of Beginning, containing 0.19 Acres more or less.


ROW Dedication Description


Part of the NE/4 NE1/4 and part of the SE1/4 NE1/4, and part of the SW1/4 NE1/4 and
part of the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:



 19
Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/4 NE1/4; Thence S 02°43'18" W along the
West line of said NE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 309.18 feet; Thence S 87°16'42" E, a
distance of 23.76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: S 02°58'57" W, a distance of 487.50 feet; S 02°40'22"
W, a distance of 608.01 feet; S 02°54'03" W, a distance of 436.29 feet; S 03°01'17" W,
a distance of 198.13 feet; S 01°25'06" W, a distance of 214.48 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a
distance of 95.61; Thence Southeasterly along the Northerly back of curb line of
Meadow Street along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
89°30'25", for a distance of 46.87 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42°02'08"
E, and distance of 42.24 feet; Thence S 01°46'07" W, a distance of 31.18 feet to the
Southerly back of curb line of said Meadow Street and the beginning of a circular curb
to the left; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 90°29'35", for a distance of 47.38 feet, said curve having a
chord bearing of S 47°57'52" W, and distance of 42.61 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance
of 88.40 feet; S 03°03'35" W, a distance of 200.01 feet; S 02°54'25" W, a distance of
322.05 feet; Thence N 88°04'02" W, a distance of 17.94 feet; Thence N 02°32'00" E, a
distance of 401.68 feet to the SW corner of the aforesaid SE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N
02°35'17" E along the West line of the said SE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 124.57 feet;
Thence N 86°38'48" W, a distance of 37.23 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence N 02°43'04" E along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 85.06 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly
back of curb line of said Razorback Road along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru
a central angle of 26°45'00", for a distance of 14.01 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 10°39'26" W, and distance of 13.88 feet; Thence N 02°32'00" E, a distance
of 34.66 feet; Thence S 86°40'45" E, a distance of 40.25 feet to the West line of the said
SE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N 02°35'17" E along the West line of the said SE1/4 NE1/4, a
distance of 1056.85 feet to the SW corner of the NE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N 02°43'18" E
along the West line of the said NE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 769.53 feet; Thence S
87°08'22" E, a distance of 5.84 feet; Thence N 02°46'31" E, a distance of 243.50 feet to
a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence N
57°28'29" E along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
21.67 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 1.43 Acres more or less.




 20
 CITY COUNCIL MEMO
 2022-262


MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2023
TO: Mayor Jordan and City Council
THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff
 Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director
FROM: Jessica Masters, Development Review Manager
DATE: December 15, 2022
SUBJECT: VAC 22-024 (RAZORBACK RD, MAPLE ST., ETC.):


RECOMMENDATION:

BACKGROUND:
The subject property includes 6.54 acres of right-of-way spread along portions of seven public streets adjacent
to University of Arkansas Property (see attached survey). Most prominently, the right-of-way includes:

• Arts District: Three separate areas of right-of-way behind street curbs on the north, west, and east borders
of the new Arts District, along W. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, S. Hill Avenue, and S. LT. Col. Leroy Pond
Avenue.
• Former Highway 112: Multiple areas of right-of-way behind the curb along both the east and west sides of
Razorback Road, north and south sides of W. Maple Street, and east and west sides of Garland Avenue.
• Cleveland Street: Two areas of right-of-way along the south side of W. Cleveland Street, between N. Lindell
Avenue to the east and N. Razorback Road to the west.

Given the large number of properties associated with the right-of-way, adjacent zoning district information is
not provided. All properties adjacent to the request are owned by the University of Arkansas with uses varying
from parking and athletic facilities to housing and classrooms. A similar proposal was heard by the Planning
Commission in late 2021, but was tabled indefinitely at the applicant’s request to allow time to coordinate with
the City Attorney’s office. The applicant is bringing back a new request, with an additional portion of right-of-
way for consideration.

Proposal: The applicant proposes to vacate 18 separate pieces of public right of way totaling 6.54 acres along
seven streets. In turn, a dedication of right-of-way totaling 1.43 acres is proposed along Razorback Road and
between W. Nolan Richardson Drive to the south and W. Maple Street to the north. With this request, the
applicant noted in their letter that existing utilities will be protected through easement dedication. Additionally,
the applicant asserts that vacating the right-of-way will remove current and future sections of Senior Walk,
landscaping, lights, and trees from the City’s responsibility.

DISCUSSION:
At the December 12, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners voted to forward the item to City
Council with a recommendation of approval, with a vote of 8-0-0. Commissioner Garlock made the motion, and

Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 21
Commissioner Winston seconded. Finding that the conditions of approval covered previous concerns about
pedestrian access and maintenance, Commissioners found the request to vacate the right-of-way to be
acceptable. No public comment was offered on the item.

City staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of VAC-2022-0024 as shown in the attached
Exhibits 'A' and 'B', and with the following conditions of approval:

1. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right-of-way vacation request,
with review and coordination by the applicant with the utility provider, including the client properly identifying
utilities in the field by means of surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with representatives.
2. Adequate accommodation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through easement or
agreement.
3. The applicant must dedicate right-of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of way does not
currently exist
4. The applicant must dedicate a pedestrian access easement to the existing back of sidewalk or master
street plan right of way in areas where sidewalk does not currently exist.
5. Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right-of-way, or an easement be dedicated over the
areas where poles and appurtenances are located.
6. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
7. An agreement will need to be developed establishing responsibility (or lack thereof) for repairs to non-
typical features behind the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any city facilities located within
vacated rights of way, including drainage facilities and water/sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for
maintenance or repair of anything except a standard sidewalk.
8. Any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense.
9. All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed by the City and
signed by the Mayor.



BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
N/A

ATTACHMENTS: SRF, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Applicant Request Letter, Petition to vacate, Survey, Planning
Commission Staff Report, VAC - 22-024 RAZORBACK-MAPLE-GARLAND-CLEVELAND-HILL -RIGHT OF
WAY




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 22
 113 West Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701
 (479) 575-8323

 Ordinance: 6640

File Number: 2022-262


VAC 22-024 (RAZORBACK RD, MAPLE ST., ETC.):

AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE VAC 22-024 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG RAZORBACK ROAD,
MAPLE STREET, GARLAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND STREET, HILL AVENUE, MARTIN LUTHER KING
JUNIOR BOULEVARD AND LT. COLONEL LEROY POND AVENUE IN WARDS 1 AND 2 TO VACATE
PORTIONS OF STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY

WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under A.C.A. § 14-54-104 to vacate public grounds or portions thereof
which are not required for corporate purposes; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the following described portions of street rights-of-way is not
required for corporate purposes.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:

Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby vacates the portions of street rights-of-
way as described in Exhibit B attached to the Planning Department’s memo.

Section 2: A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk along with the map attached as Exhibit A to the
Planning Department’s memo shall be filed in the office of the Washington County Circuit Clerk.

Section 3: This vacation approval is subject to the following conditions:


 1. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right-of-way vacation request, with
 review and coordination by the applicant with the utility provider, including properly identifying utilities in the
 field by means of surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with representatives.
 2. Adequate accommodation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through easement or agreement.
 3. The applicant must dedicate right-of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of way does not
 currently exist.
 4. The applicant must dedicate a pedestrian access easement to the existing back of sidewalk or master street plan
 right of way in areas where sidewalk does not currently exist.
 5. Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right-of-way, or an easement be dedicated over the areas
 where poles and appurtenances are located.
 6. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
 7. An agreement will need to be developed establishing responsibility for repairs to non-typical features behind



 Page 1
 23
Ordinance: 6640
File Number: 2022-262

 the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any city facilities located within vacated rights of way,
 including drainage facilities and water/sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for maintenance or repair
 of anything except a standard sidewalk.
 8. Any damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/developer’s expense.
 9. All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed by the City and signed
 by the Mayor.




PASSED and APPROVED on February 7, 2023


Approved: Attest:



_______________________________ _______________________________
Lioneld Jordan, Mayor Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer




 Page 2
 24
 EXHIBIT 'A' | VAC-2022-0024

VAC-2022-0024 521 S. RAZORBACK RD
 One Mile View


 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Miles
 RMF-40

 CLEVELAND ST




 GARLAND AVE LEVERETT AVE
 Subject Properties




 Subject Properties

 MAPLE ST




 ARKANSAS AVE
 DG NC


 P-1
 RSF-4
 CPZD Subject Properties

 DICKSON ST



 MSC



 Subject Properties
 R CEN
 ND TE
 O R
 NT ST
 I
 CL
 STADIUM

 DR




 RAZORBACK RD

 S TADIU M DR
 Subject Properties

 IBALD
 R CH BLVD
 A LL
 YE
 RMF-24
 MARTIN LUTHER
 KING JR BLVD SCHOOL
 C-2
 AVE
 C-1
 I-1
CS UT R-O RPZD


 Zoning I-2 General Industrial
 Neighborhood Link RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY EXTRACTION
 NS-G E-1
 Institutional Master Plan
 RI-U COMMERCIAL
 Regional Link - High Activity RI-12 Residential-Office
 NS-L C-1
 Urban Center Residential-Agricultural C-2
 RSF-.5 C-3
 Unclassified RSF-1 FORM BASED DISTRICTS
 RSF-2 Downtown Core
 Alley RSF-4 Urban Thoroughfare
 RSF-7 Main Street Center
 Residential Link
 RSF-8 Downtown General
 Shared-Use Paved Trail RSF-18 Community Services
 RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY Neighborhood Services
 Trail (Proposed) RMF-6 Neighborhood Conservation
 RMF-12 PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS
 Design Overlay District RMF-18 Commercial, Industrial, Residential
 Fayetteville City Limits Planning Area RMF-24
 RMF-40
 INSTITUTIONAL
 P-1
 Planning Area INDUSTRIAL
 Fayetteville City Limits I-1 Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial



 25
LIST OF EXHIBITS
 The attached maps and legal descriptions identify the boundary areas for which the
 University and the City agree are subject to this MOA. This list may be changed or amended
 by mutual agreement of the parties to maintain the accuracy of the agreement.

 1) SOUTH RAZORBACK ROAD
 a) RAZORBACK ROAD - Martin Luther King Blvd to Maple Street

 2) MAPLE HILL BLOCK
 a) RAZORBACK ROAD - Maple Street to Cleveland Ave
 b) CLEVELAND AVE - Razorback Road to Lindell Ave
 c) MAPLE STREET - Razorback Road to Garland Ave
 d) GARLAND AVE - Maple Street to Cleveland Ave

 3) ART AND DESIGN DISTRICT
 a) MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD – Hill Ave to LeRoy Pond Dr
 b) HILL AVE – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South Property Boundary
 c) LEROY POND DR. – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South Property
 Boundary


 The University and the City anticipate that this list will be amended in the future to add the
 following:

 • UREC TENNIS PARK / BAUM STADIUM
 a) RAZORBACK ROAD- Martin Luther King Blvd to 15th Street

 • NORTH GARLAND AVE
 a) GARLAND AVE - Cleveland Ave to North Street / Wedington Dr




11313


 26
 EXHIBIT 1
 SOUTH RAZORBACK ROAD
RAZORBACK ROAD - Martin Luther King Blvd to Maple Street




 27
 3910




 CONC




 W HOTZ DR
 S




 ROW VACATION #14
 P.O.B.

MATCH LINE MATCH LINE

 STANDARD 6"X6" CURB




 ASPHALT

 ATT
 VAULT




 S




 ROW VACATION #14
 W




 PROPOSED CURB LINE


 W




 PAVERS




 CONC. &
 ELECTRIC BOX
 S




 PAVERS




 MEADOW ST
 MEADOW ST
 ASPHALT




 ELECTRIC
 BOX




 TELEPHONE
 VAULT




 TRANSFORMER




 CONC. WALK
 ISLAMIC CENTER
 OF
 NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
 CONC WALK




 SOUTHWEST CORNER
 CONC.


 OF THE SE41 NE41
 W CENTER ST SECTION 17, T16N, R30W

 SIGN




 CONC.




 ROW VACATION #13
 ASPHALT
 P.O.B.


 CONC. WALK




 PROPOSED CURB LINE
 CURB CUT




 ASPHALT




 ASPHALT




 TRANSFORMER




 ELEC. CONC WALK
 PED




 CONC. PAD
 IRR
 CNTRL.
 ELEC.
 PED




 IRR




 CONC.



 ROW VACATION #10
 ASPHALT




 CONC. WALK




 P.O.B.




 S




  ROW VACATION #13 S
 ROW VACATION #10




 CONC. WALK




 ASPHALT




 ASPHALT

 CONC.




 GAS
 PIPE
 MARKER




 NOLAN RICHARDSON DR S




 ASPHALT
 NOLAN RICHARDSON DR



ROW VACATION #12
 ROW VACATION #11
P.O.B.
 P.O.B.




 S




 ASPHALT
 ROW VACATION #11

ROW VACATION #12 NORTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE SE41 SE41
 SECTION 17, T16N, R30W




 BUS PULL OFF AREA
 INCLUDED IN ROW
 VACATION AREA




 ROW Dedication Area
 ASPHALT




  MITCHELL STREET




 CONC. WALK




 CONC. WALK




 ASPHALT




 CONC. WALK

 CONC.




 S S




 ROW Vacation Area

 ASPHALT




 CONC. WALK
 CONC. WALK
 CONC.



 GRASS




 Upon approval and acceptance of the ROW Vacation and Dedication areas shown hereon, the ROW limits will be:

 S
 From back of curb to back of curb for the following areas:
 ASPHALT
 ASPHALT




 · Razorback Road from MLK JR BLVD to Maple Street
 -Note: East side of Razorback Rd ROW Vacation area also includes the buss pull off area north of Mitchell St
 -Note: West side of Razorback Rd, South of Hotz Dr and north of ADSB adjusted ROW is shown hereon to be
 along the proposed back of curb.
 -Note: The ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, along the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas, north
 of Center St is not a part of this and is to remain unchanged.
 · North and South sides of Maple St from Razorback Rd to Garland Avenue.
 · East and west sides of Garland Avenue from Maple St to Clevland St.
 -Note: East side of Maple St ROW Vacation area also includes the Bus pull off area between Douglas St &
 Clevland St.
 Along the North edge of the sidewalk for the following area:
 · South side of Clevland St from Garland Avenue to Razorback Rd.



 28
 SOUTHWEST CORNER
 OF THE SE41 SE41
 SECTION 17, T16N, R30W
 EXHIBIT 2
 MAPLE HILL BLOCK
 RAZORBACK ROAD - Maple Street to Cleveland Ave
 CLEVELAND AVE - Razorback Road to Lindell Ave
 MAPLE STREET - Razorback Road to Garland Ave
 GARLAND AVE - Maple Street to Cleveland Ave




11313


 29
 W
 W




 ASPHALT ASPHALT
 W
 W
 W
 W


 S CONC WALK CONC
 W CONC
 W WATER VAULT GRAVEL

 S
 CONC WALK


 CONCRETE WALK
 S ASPHALT
 CONC WALK
 CONC CONC
 ASPHALT CONC WALK
 S

 CONC WALK
 ASPHALT

 ASPHALT
 ASPHALT


 ASPHALT

 CONC



 CONC WALK




 ASPHALT




 ASPHALT
 ASPHALT




 ASPHALT
 ROW VACATION #7
 P.O.B.
 ROW VACATION #5
 CONC DRIVE
 CONC WALK



 P.O.B.
 W W




 ROW VACATION #5 ASPHALT




 W




 EMER. CALL
 BIKE RACK
 BOX


 CONC WALK
 C/O CONC
 W STEPS UP
 STEPS DOWN

 S
 G



 ASPHALT




 C/O
 W




 C/O
 W




 C/O

 3
 STEPS



 S




 C/O


 BUS PULL OFF AREA
 INCLUDED IN ROW
 VACATION AREA
 W
 G




 C/O



 3
 STEPS




 CONC WALK




 ROW VACATION #7


 W CONC WALK




 CONC G


 C/O STEPS UP




 CONC
 C/O



 CONCRETE WALK
 C/O
 C/O



 CONC WALK
 C/O

 CONC WALK




 C/O




 CONC WALK
 S




 CONC WALK




 C/O

 BIKE RACK
 C/O CONC
 CONC WALK LANDSCAPE
 2
 C/O STEPS




 CONC WALK




 W DOUGLAS ST
 S




 A
 ARE
 APE
 DSC



 ROW VACATION #18
 LAN




 CONCRETE




 FUTRALL HALL
 E
 SCAP
 RAMP LAND
 AREA
 RETE

 CONC




 CONCRETE




 TUNNEL TOP
 S




 W




 ROW VACATION #6


 HOLCOMBE HALL
 S

 ROW VACATION #18
 P.O.B. ASPHALT




 ROW VACATION #17 NORTHWEST CORNER CONCRETE WALK




 OF THE NE41 NE41
 ROW VACATION #17 SECTION 17, T16N, R30W
 ROW VACATION #5
 P.O.B. STONES




 CONC.




 CONCRETE WALK
 LANDSCAPE
 3
 G STEPS
 COBB
 LEST
 ONE


 PAVE
 CONC

 ASPHALT
 RS


 CONC
 CONC WALK
 EDGE OF
 BLDG. CANOPY
 CONC 3
 STEPS CONC WALK



 LANDSCAPE AREA
 S




 DAVIS HALL
 CONC.




 LANDSCAPE AREA
 CONC. WALK
 BENCH



 PAVE



 LANDSCAPE
 BENCH CONC.
 RS
 LANDSCAPE
 C/O
 BIKE RACK



 PAVERSPAVERS
 STONES



 CONCRETE
 LANDSCAPE AREA
 CONC WALK
 2.5' BRICK
 4
 STEPS




 ONLY
 LANDSCAPE CONC. WALL
 LANDSCAPE
 LANDSCAPE AREA
 METAL


 ONLY
 2.5' BRICK
 HATCH
 CON
 WALL
 PAVE
 C. W
 RS S
 PAVER
 BRICK


 UTILITIES TUNNEL TUNNEL
 CONC. WALK HATCH W




 S
 ONLY


 ROW VACATION #9 PAV
 ERS

 TRAFFIC BOX
 CONC. WALK
 ONLY
 ROW VACATION #6
 P.O.B.
 ELECTRIC
 BOX
 CONC. METAL
 S HATCH
 (TYP.)


 C/O
 CONC.


 PAVERS STORM DRAIN
 GRATE INLET
 TOP ELEV.=1399.74



 ROW VACATION #16
 FL ELEV.=1398.39




 CANOPY
 S

 ONLY
 SECTION CORNER
 P.O.B. STORM DRAIN
 GRATE INLET
 TOP ELEV.=1399.61
 FL ELEV.=1397.34
 STONE
 ONLY
 S8, S9, S16, S17
 CONC.




 T16N, R30W


 STADIUM DR
 CANOPY
 ADMIN
 CONC.
 BUILDING




 CANOPY
 ROW VACATION #8
 ROW VACATION #8 P.O.B.


 ONLY



 ONLY
 S




 ROW VACATION #9
 P.O.B.
 ROW DEDICATION
 P.O.B.




 X
 Upon approval and acceptance of the ROW Vacation and Dedication areas shown hereon, the ROW limits will be:

 From back of curb to back of curb for the following areas:

 · Razorback Road from MLK JR BLVD to Maple Street
 -Note: East side of Razorback Rd ROW Vacation area also includes the buss pull off area north of Mitchell St
 -Note: West side of Razorback Rd, South of Hotz Dr and north of ADSB adjusted ROW is shown hereon to be
 along the proposed back of curb.
 -Note: The ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, along the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas, north
 X of Center St is not a part of this and is to remain unchanged.
 ROW VACATION #16 · North and South sides of Maple St from Razorback Rd to Garland Avenue.
 · East and west sides of Garland Avenue from Maple St to Clevland St.
 -Note: East side of Maple St ROW Vacation area also includes the Bus pull off area between Douglas St &
 Clevland St.
 Along the North edge of the sidewalk for the following area:
 · South side of Clevland St from Garland Avenue to Razorback Rd.




 ROW Dedication Area
 S




 X



 S




 CONC



 ASPHALT




 X




 S




 X ROW DEDICATION

 QUAZITE QUAZITE
 BOX




 W MARKHAM S



 RD
 S
 SOUTHWEST CORNER ROW Vacation Area
 OF THE NE41 NE41
 SECTION 17, T16N, R30W



 ROW VACATION #15
 P.O.B.




 ROW VACATION #15

 C/O




 G




 3910




 CONC




 W HOTZ DR
 S




 ROW VACATION #14
 P.O.B.

MATCH LINE MATCH LINE 30
 STANDARD 6"X6" CURB




 ASPHALT

 ATT
 EXHIBIT 3
 ART AND DESIGN DISTRICT
 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD – Hill Ave to LeRoy Pond Dr
 HILL AVE – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South Property Boundary
LEROY POND DR. – Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd to South Property Boundary




 31
 TRAFFIC BOX


 ELECTRIC BOX



 ELECTRIC BOX




 ELECTRIC BOX

 EXISTING 10'
 TRAFFIC BOX S R.O.W. DEDICATION
 ROW VACATION #3 PER PLAT 16-64
 P.O.B. (TO BE VACATED)
 S ROW VACATION #3

 L18
 W S
 W
 ROW VACATION #4
 P.O.B.
 W S
 W




 X
 1-STORY BUILDIN
 G


 EXISTING
 G
 UTILITY EASEMENT
 PER PLAT 16-64
 (TO BE VACATED)




 X
 W




 X X



 X

 1-STORY BUILDIN
 G
 EXISTING
 SW
 UTILITY EASEMENT
 X
 PER PLAT 16-64 SE X
 (TO BE VACATED) LINE NORTH OF THIS
 NW CORNER FIRE LINE
 BEND IS TEMPORARY ROW VACATION #4
 S
 NE1/4 NW1/4
 G
 G
 X
 SECTION 21
 T16N, R30W
 EXISTING WW


 UTILITY EASEMENT
 PER PLAT 16-64
 (TO BE VACATED) TRANSFORMER
 20' UTILITY EASEMENT



 DOC. NO. 2005-12402

 ROW VACATION #2
 32
 E1
 S


 W W


 G
 FIRE LINE

 ELECTRIC
 BOX
 ELECTRIC
 BOX
 UAFH SECTION 16
 X
 X
 GOVERNMENT AVENUE WAREHOUS




 X
 SECTION 21
 X G
 W
 X
 X
 X BLDG.
 10' UTILITY EASEMENT




 PLAT 23-208



 Y ANNEX
 LIBRAR
 S

 G
 W
 ABANDONED WATER LINE




 FDC TRANSFORMER
 N
 E
 N
 S
 S S
 ELECTRIC
 DIO BOX
 URE STU
 SCULPT ER LINE
 NED SEW
 ABANDO




 ATION c/o ILROAD
 CORPOR A FE RA
 PACIFIC RN SANT
 SANTA FE NORTHE
 GT ON
 BURLIN
 S
 ROW VACATION #2
 P.O.B.
 S
 ELECTRIC
 BOX
 S


 S
 ROW VACATION #1
 P.O.B.




 S
 ROW VACATION #1




 ROW Vacation Area
G:\2019 \19-179\Survey\UA-CITY Coord Map.DWG
 pecorded: 02/
Goo
Kind. ODINANCE Rg
 I

1]/ 2023 at 10:30: 20 An Fee Pmi: $
85. 00 Page 1 of 15 Maehlnato court,
All Kyle SV
IvesTer Clrcu It clerk FI le -
2023-0 0 3981 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR
 72701 ARCHIVED 479)
 8323 Ordinance: 6640 575-
 File Number:


 2022- 262 VAC 22-




 024 R(
 AZORBACK RD, MAPLE ST., ETC.)
 AN ORDINANCE


 TO APPROVE VAC 22-
 024 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG RAZORBACK ROAD, MAPLE STREET,
 GARLAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND STREET, HILL AVENUE, MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR BOULEVARD
 AND LT.COLONEL LEROY POND AVENUE IN WARDS 1 AND 2 TO VACATE PORTIONS OF
 STREET RIGHTS - OF -
 WAY WHEREAS, the



 City Council has the authority under A. C.A. 14-
 § 54- 104 to vacate public grounds or portions thereof which are
 not required for corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the

 City Council has determined that the fol owing described portions of street rights - of -
 way is not required for
 corporate purposes. NOW,THEREFORE,

 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section
 1:



 That the City Council of the City of Fayet evil e, Arkansas hereby vacates the portions of street rights -of -
 way as
 described in Exhibit B attached to the Planning Department' s memo. Section 2:

 A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk along with the map at ached as Exhibit A to the Planning Department'
 s memo shal be filed in the of ice of the Washington County Circuit Clerk.Section 3:

 This vacatidn approval is subject to the fol owing conditions 1.
 Easements


 shal be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right-of-way vacation request, with review and
 coordination by the applicant with the utility provider, including properly identifying utilities in the field by
 means of surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with representatives. 2.Adequate
 acom odation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through easement or agreement. 3.The
 ap licant must dedicate right- of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of way does not currently exist.
 4.
 The
 ap licant must dedicate a pedestrian ac es easement to the existing back of sidewalk or master street plan right of
 way in areas where sidewalk does not currently exist. 5. Signal
 poles and appurtenances must remain in the right- of-way, or an easement be dedicated over the areas where poles
 and appurtenances are located.6.Drainage
 easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities. 7. An
 agre ment will need to be developed establishing responsibility for repairs to non typi-cal features behind Page 1
Ordinance: 6640
File Number: 2022- 262



 the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any city facilities located within vacated rights of way,
 including drainage facilities and water/ sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for maintenance or repair
 of anything except a standard sidewalk.
 8.  Any damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/ developer' s expense.
 9. All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed by the City and signed
 by the Mayor.




PASSED and APPROVED on February 7, 2023



 Attest:




 G.
 C1 Tr
 Kara Paxton, City CE rk Treasur r ; 4k • :
 j/ • cn




 Ir




 Page 2
EXHIBIT 'A' I VAC- 2022- 0024
 EXHIBIT ' B'
 VAC- 2022- 0024


ROW Vacation Description

 1


Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence S 60000' 27" E, a
distance of 525. 14 feet to the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 02040' 45" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Hill
Avenue, a distance of 36. 68 feet; Thence S 82° 20' 08" W, a distance of 11. 08 feet to a
point on the Easterly back of curb line of Hill Avenue; Thence N 02052' 05" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 36. 70 feet; Thence N 82020' 08" E, a
distance of 10. 96 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 01 acres more or less.


 2


Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:



Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence S 64005' 15" E, a
distance of 507. 77 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the
Point of Beginning; Thence S 82020'08" W, a distance of 10. 82 feet to a point on the
Easterly back of curb line of said Hill Avenue; Thence N 02052' 05" E along the said
Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 132. 06 feet; Thence N 02041' 12" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 362.61 feet; Thence S 87010' 32" E, a
distance of 6. 48 feet to the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue the following three courses: S
02032' 37" W, a distance of 184. 79 feet; S 01 °43' 05" W, a distance of 193. 23 feet; S
02040' 45" W, a distance of 114. 72 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 09 acres
more or less.




Part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NW corner of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21. Thence N 68047' 51"
E, a distance of 718. 90 feet to a point of the Southerly right of way line of M. L. K. JR
Boulevard; Thence S 86032' 38" E, a distance of 277. 65 feet to a point on the Southerly
right of way line of M. L. K. JR Boulevard; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
M. L. K. JR Boulevard the following three courses: S 03027' 22" W, a distance of 10. 00
feet; N 86032' 38" W, a distance of 277. 52 feet; N 02042' 49" E, a distance of 10. 00 feet
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 06 acres more or less.


 4


Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:



Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence N 77059' 30" E, a
distance of 1124. 85 feet the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of M. L. K. JR
Boulevard and the Westerly right of way line of Government Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 86° 32' 38" E, a distance of 8. 00 feet to a point on the Westerly
back of curb line of said Government Avenue; Thence S 02028' 13" W along the said
Westerly back of curb line, a distance of 370.23 feet; Thence S 82019' 51" W, a distance
of 19. 56 feet to the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue the following three
courses: N 02031' 09" E, a distance of 208. 36 feet; S 87° 04' 21" E, a distance of 11. 07
feet; N 02028' 13" E, a distance of 165. 53 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 13
acres more or less.




 5


Part of the SE1/ 4 of Section 8 and part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the SE corner of said Section 8; Thence N 02053'25" E along the East
line of said Section 8, a distance of 1260. 95 feet; Thence N 87° 09' 15" W, a distance of
117. 56 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the Point
of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street the
following bearings and distances: N 87' 09' 15" W, a distance of 478. 83 feet; N
02° 50' 45" E, a distance of 12. 44 feet; N 87° 09' 15" W, a distance of 715. 54 feet to a
point on the proposed Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street; Thence along
the Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street the following bearings and
distance: Northeasterly along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle
of 57° 21' 17", for a distance of 29. 53 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
63° 53' 14" E, and distance of 28. 31 feet; S 87" 26' 07" E, a distance of 805. 77 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the right; Southeasterly along a 5. 00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90000' 00", for a distance of 7. 85 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of S 42° 26' 07" E, and distance of 7. 07 feet; S 02° 33' 53" W, a distance
of 6. 83 feet; S 87° 26' 07" E, a distance of 386. 19 feet to the beginning of a circular curve
to the right, said point being at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb line of said
Clevland Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along
the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: Southeasterly along a 37. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central
angle of 89° 49' 41 ", for a distance of 58. 79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S
42' 31' 16" E, and distance of 52. 95 feet; Thence S 02" 23' 34" W, a distance of 736. 30
feet; Thence S 03* 10' 11" W, a distance of 391. 26 feet; Thence S 03010' 11" W, a
distance of 61. 13 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly back of curb
line of West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 39. 50 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89020' 08", for a distance of 61. 59 feet,
said curve having a chord bearing of S 47050' 15" W, and distance of 55. 54 feet; N
87029' 41" W, a distance of 1184. 55 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right
at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback road the following bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a
30. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89° 59' 12", for a distance of
47. 12 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 42° 30' 05" W, and distance of 42. 42
feet; N 02029' 30" E, a distance of 20. 32 feet; Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback Road and along the Northerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distance: S 87° 16' 56" E, a distance of 36. 71
feet; S 32° 16' 27" E, a distance of 12. 21 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
85050' 33" E, a distance of 196. 14 feet; S 86017' 43" E, a distance of 367. 01 feet; N
58048' 06" E, a distance of 43. 32 feet; S 87056' 08" E, a distance of 61. 00 feet; S
53' 43' 12" E, a distance of 30. 23 feet; S 87056' 08" E, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
02003' 52" W, a distance of 10. 00 feet; S 87056' 08" E, a distance of 128. 00 feet; S
80044' 15" E, a distance of 27. 21 feet; S 87049' 55" E, a distance of 27. 57 feet; N
02° 03' 52" E, a distance of 10. 46 feet; S 87° 56' 08" E, a distance of 141. 43 feet; S
78000' 34" E, a distance of 29. 74 feet; S 87043' 15" E, a distance of 93. 43 feet to the

intersection of the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly
right of way line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 51 ° 46' 34" E, a distance of
53. 54 feet; N 08° 37' 03" E, a distance of 7. 95 feet; N 03° 14' 28" E, a distance of 238. 68
feet; N 41 ° 45' 32" W, a distance of 6. 15 feet; N 03° 14' 28" E, a distance of 77. 00 feet; N
48014' 28" E, a distance of 6. 15 feet; N 03014' 28" E, a distance of 136. 61 feet; N
02031' 16" E, a distance of 701. 38 feet; N 58° 12' 33" W, a distance of 51. 84 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 1. 67 Acres more or less.

M.


Part of the SW1/ 4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 74° 45'30" E, a distance of
95. 94 feet to a point lying on the Northerly right of way line of West Maple Street and
the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03° 06' 30" W, a distance of 9. 11 feet to the intersection
of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the Easterly back of
curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said
Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 86° 53' 30" W, a distance of
36. 05 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Northwesterly along a 39. 50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90° 03' 41", for a distance of 62. 09
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 41 °51' 40" W, and distance of 55. 89 feet; N
03' 10' 11" E, a distance of 65. 85 feet; N 03* 10' 11" E, a distance of 381. 32 feet; N
02° 23' 34" E, a distance of 10. 44 feet; Northeasterly along a 19. 50 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 51014' 11 ", for a distance of 17. 44 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of N 28° 00' 40" E, and distance of 16.86 feet; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and along the Easterly right of way
line of said Garland Avenue, S 02° 53' 25" W, a distance of 465. 30 feet to the intersection
of the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly right of way
line of aforesaid West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly right of way line of said
West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: S 42055'49" E, a distance of
43.49 feet; S 74' 15' 21" E, a distance of 35. 89 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing
0. 12 Acres more or less.


 7


Part of the SW1/ 4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 02053' 25" E along the West
line of said Section 9, a distance of 1297. 88 feet; Thence S 87006' 35" E, a distance of
44. 78 feet to the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the
Easterly right of way line of Garland Avenue and the Point of Beginning; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: S 48020' 03" W, a distance of 27. 69 feet; S 02° 53' 40" W, a distance of 707. 66
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly
back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 19. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
52° 26' 46",for a distance of 17. 85 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23049' 49"
W, and distance of 17. 23 feet; N 02" 23' 34" E, a distance of 250. 85 feet; Thence leaving
the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue N 02° 23' 34" E, a distance of
209. 31 feet to a point on the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence
N 02023' 34" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue, a distance
of 229. 09 feet to the intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland
Avenue and the Southerly back of curb line of aforesaid Clevland Street and the
beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
said Clevland Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 31. 50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 91 ° 00' 58", for a distance of 50. 04
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 47054' 03" E, and distance of 44. 94 feet; S
86035' 28" E, a distance of 276. 96 feet; Thence leaving the Southerly back of curb line of
said Clevland Street, S 02053' 25" W, a distance of 6. 72 feet to a point lying on the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street; Thence N 87007'28" W along the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street, a distance of 275.22 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0. 24 Acres more or less.



 8


Part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of said Section 17; Thence S 02° 41' 08" W along the East
line of said Section 17, a distance of 44.57 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of
way line of West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly
right of way line of said West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: N
87056' 08" W, a distance of 529. 41 feet; S 02° 03' 52" W, a distance of 10. 00 feet; N
87056' 08" W, a distance of 45. 09 feet; S 29° 02' 41" W, a distance of 50. 50 feet; S
79° 37' 29" W, a distance of 17. 72 feet to the Easterly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence N 02° 37' 28" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive, a
distance of 49. 69 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive and the Southerly back of curb
line of West maple Street; Thence along the Southerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30. 00 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89052' 51 ", for a distance of 47. 06 feet,
said curve having a chord bearing of N 47° 33' 53" E, and distance of 42. 38 feet; S
87° 29' 41" E, a distance of 584. 19 feet; S 02041' 08" W, a distance of 16. 09 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 0. 31 Acres more or less.

 9


Part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 18" W along the
West line of said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 309. 18 feet; Thence S 87° 16' 42" E, a
distance of 23. 76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence N 02° 58' 57" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road, a distance of 160. 23 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the
intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Southerly
back of curb line of West Maple Street; Thence Northeasterly along the Southerly back
of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 100. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 89031' 22",for a distance of 156. 25 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 47°44' 38" E, and distance of 140.83 feet; Thence S 87029' 41" E along the
Southerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 514. 79 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb
line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence Southeasterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive along
a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90007' 09", for a distance of
47. 19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42026' 07" E, and distance of 42.47
feet; Thence S 02037' 28" W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive,
a distance of 57. 35 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street
the following bearings and distances: S 79037' 29" W, a distance of 17. 02 feet; N
43° 37' 28" W, a distance of 44. 19 feet; N 43° 37' 28" W, a distance of 22. 24 feet; N
54° 03' 02" W, a distance of 48. 45 feet; N 85' 43' 19" W, a distance of 137. 52 feet; N
71 ° 49' 55" W, a distance of 7. 76 feet; N 86045' 54" W, a distance of 94. 00 feet; S
03014' 11" W, a distance of 14. 50 feet; N 86045' 49" W, a distance of 26. 00 feet;
Thence N 03014' 11" E, a distance of 14. 50 feet; N 86045' 50" W, a distance of 178. 59
feet; S 54043' 02" W, a distance of 69. 92 feet; S 36042' 58" W, a distance of 24. 53 feet to
the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence S 02° 43' 04" W along the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 168. 40 feet; Thence S
57028' 29" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
34. 08 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 43 Acres more or less.

 10


Part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 27" W along
the West line of said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4, a distance of 401. 69 feet; Thence S 88004' 02" E, a
distance of 19.28 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 88004' 02" E, a distance of
26. 98 feet; S 02034' 31" W, a distance of 474. 04 feet; S 47017' 49" E, a distance of 35. 62

feet; S 07° 31' 38" W, a distance of 17. 21 feet to a point lying on the Northerly back of
curb line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence N 87° 28' 31" W along the Northerly back of
curb line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 17. 76 feet to the beginning of a
circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said
Nolan Richardson Drive and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a 29. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 90007' 05",
 for a distance of 45. 61 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 42024' 59" W, and distance of 41. 05 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of
84. 03 feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 51. 67 feet; N 00020' 35" E, a distance of 158. 49
feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 132. 04 feet; N 02054' 25" E, a distance of 58. 72 feet to
the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 30 Acres more or less.
 11


Part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 and part of the SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North,
Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02° 43' 27" W along
the West line of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4, a distance of 990. 51 feet; Thence S 87° 16' 33" E,

a distance of 41. 41 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02° 37' 57" W, a distance of
191. 59 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 503. 00 feet; S 32048' 03" E, a distance of
15. 96 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 40. 50 feet; N 87022' 03" W, a distance of 8. 46
feet; S 02032' 57" W, a distance of 201. 50 feet; S 02046' 05" W, a distance of 308. 48 feet;
S 87° 22' 03" E, a distance of 9. 23 feet; S 04029' 42" E, a distance of 54. 63 feet; S
45045' 33" E, a distance of 15. 96 feet; S 76° 34' 38" E, a distance of 36. 68 feet; Thence S

88° 32' 28" W, a distance of 64. 27 feet to the to the Easterly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 40.00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
51 ° 46' 46", for a distance of 36. 15 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23014' 49"
W, and distance of 34. 93 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of 245. 78 feet; N 00039' 11" E,
a distance of 172. 82 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of 113. 63; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02038' 34" E, a distance of 86. 00
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road; Thence N 02038' 34" E
along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 35. 14 feet;
Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02038' 34" E, a
distance of 157. 12 feet to a the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: N 02038' 34" E, a distance of 215. 84; N 04046' 38" E, a distance

of 161. 08 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of 125. 51 feet to the beginning of a circular
curve to the right; Northeasterly along a 34. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a
central angle of 89052' 55", for a distance of 54. 12 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 47035' 01" E, and distance of 48. 74 feet; S 87° 28' 31" E, a distance of 4. 65

feet; Thence S 02031' 29" W, a distance of 17. 24 feet to a point lying on the Southerly
right of way line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence S 44° 34' 24" W along the Southerly
right of way line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 36. 39 feet to the Point of
Beginning, containing 0. 64 Acres more or less.
 12


Part of the NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 and part of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16
North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 27" W, a
distance of 954.57 feet; Thence N 87021' 26" W, a distance of 48. 50 feet to a point lying
on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and
distances: S 02041' 40" W, a distance of 885. 85 feet; S 42059' 26" W, a distance of
26. 15 feet; S 11' 00' 02" W, a distance of 60. 47 feet; S 02° 30' 15" W, a distance of 30. 08
feet; S 87022' 03" E, a distance of 31. 00 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 240. 00 feet;
S 07012' 24" W, a distance of 75. 24 feet; S 00052' 46" E, a distance of 13. 61 feet; S
15010' 00" W, a distance of 23. 86 feet; S 59011' 49" W, a distance of 60. 93 feet; Thence
N 88032' 28" E, a distance of 65. 11 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 39. 50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 43° 02' 25", for a distance of 29. 67 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of N 24009'42" E, and distance of 28. 98 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance
of 256. 33 feet; N 04037' 56" E, a distance of 172. 82 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of
607. 73 feet; N 00030' 29" E, a distance of 161. 08 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of
126. 25 feet; Northwesterly along a 33. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central
angle of 49041' 15",  for a distance of 29. 05 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
22012' 04" W, and distance of 28. 15 feet; Thence N 87028' 31" W, a distance of 7. 18 feet
to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 76 Acres more or less.

 13


Part of the NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02° 43'27" W along
the East line of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 43.47 feet; Thence N 87° 16' 33" W,
a distance of 30. 92 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02005' 15" W, a distance of
192. 55 feet; S 02056' 28" W, a distance of 171. 14 feet; S 02056' 28" W, a distance of
52. 91 feet; N 87° 22' 08" W, a distance of 17. 55 feet; S 02° 37' 57" W, a distance of 70. 15
feet; Thence S 16040' 05" W, a distance of 28. 86 feet; S 02° 37' 57" W, a distance of
82. 00 feet; S 30042' 28" W, a distance of 17. 53 feet; S 03025' 24" W, a distance of 50. 00
feet; S 45° 00' 08" E, a distance of 21. 57 feet; S 03006' 51" W, a distance of 163. 01 feet;
S 09006' 16" W, a distance of 24. 47 feet; Thence S 87028' 31" E, a distance of 8. 84 feet

to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular
curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 46040' 08", for a distance of 24. 03 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of N 25° 58' 38" E, and distance of 23. 37 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance
of 83. 71 feet; N 02030' 46" E, a distance of 51. 61 feet; N 04040' 57" E, a distance of
158. 48 feet; N 02030' 46" E, a distance of 132. 20 feet; N 02° 54' 25" E, a distance of
380. 29 feet; N 00022' 40" W, a distance of 25. 69 feet to a circular curve to the left;
Northwesterly along a 27. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
23019' 03",
 for a distance of 11. 19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 12° 02' 11"
W, and distance of 11. 11 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 23 Acres more or
less.


 14


Part of the SW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02035' 17" W along
the East line of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 545. 93 feet; Thence N 86° 40' 08"
W, a distance of 42. 18 feet to the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: S 02052' 01" W, a distance of 302.22 feet; S
86038' 50" E, a distance of 3. 21 feet; S 02032' 00" W, a distance of 179. 59 feet to a point
on the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a
circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30. 00 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 27° 36' 29", for a distance of 14. 46 feet, said
curve having a chord bearing of N 16031' 19" E, and distance of 14. 32 feet; N 02043' 04"
E, a distance of 9. 68 feet; Thence leaving said Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and along the proposed Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: N 02°43'04" E, a distance of 85. 06 feet; N
04037' 24" E, a distance of 214. 63 feet; N 03001' 17" E, a distance of 140. 19 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the left on the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
38031' 42",
 for a distance of 19.84 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 16014' 34"
W, and distance of 19. 47 feet; Thence N 86° 40' 08" W, a distance of 7. 97 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 0. 11 Acres more or less.

 15


Part of the SW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02035' 17" W along
the West line of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 31. 42 feet; Thence N 87024' 43" W,
a distance of 35. 00 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way lien of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03° 03' 28" W along the Westerly right of way
line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 469. 02 feet; Thence S 86040' 08" E, a

distance of 18. 37 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the
beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of
said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 23. 50
feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 34000' 59", for a distance of 13. 95
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 19° 54' 33" E, and distance of 13. 75 feet; N
02° 54' 03" E, a distance of 417. 63 feet; Thence N 02° 40' 22" E, a distance of 6. 09 feet to

the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Northwesterly along a 35. 50 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 65° 48' 22", for a distance of 40. 77 feet, said

curve having a chord bearing of N 30° 13' 49" W, and distance of 38. 57 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0. 23 Acres more or less.
 16


Part of the NW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 18" W along
the West line of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 35. 57 feet; Thence N 87015' 25" W,
a distance of 98. 42 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02" 43' 04" W, a distance of
16. 99 feet; S 87' 16' 56" E, a distance of 23. 00 feet; S 48006' 31" E, a distance of 34. 83
feet; S 02059' 34" E, a distance of 40. 20 feet; S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 83. 09 feet; S
32043' 04" W, a distance of 22. 48 feet; S 55° 46' 02" E, a distance of 8. 49 feet; S
02043' 04" W, a distance of 58. 00 feet; N 87' 16' 56" W, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 20. 00 feet; S 22017' 57" E, a distance of 33. 11 feet; S
08° 25' 42" W, a distance of 60. 30 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 164. 00 feet; S
62053' 17" W, a distance of 23. 05 feet; S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 26. 97 feet; N
87016' 56" W, a distance of 49. 00 feet; S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 20. 56 feet; S
87016' 56" E, a distance of 64. 00 feet; S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 52. 51 feet; S
87008' 22" E, a distance of 26. 12 feet; S 02046' 31" W, a distance of 668. 51 feet; Thence
S 87012' 53" E, a distance of 3. 08 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback
Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back
of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly
along a 32. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 63006' 05", for a
distance of 35. 79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 34013' 24" E, and distance
of 34. 01 feet; N 02040' 22" E, a distance of 507. 98 feet; N 02058' 57" E, a distance of
647. 83 feet; N 02058' 57" E, a distance of 88. 90 feet to the beginning of a circular curve
to the left; Northwesterly along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle
of 90009' 00", for a distance of 47. 20 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
42005' 33" W, and distance of 42. 48 feet; N 87° 10' 03" W, a distance of 57. 37 feet;
Thence S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 5. 88 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 97
Acres more or less.


 17

Part of the NW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17 and part of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 8, all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point that lies N 80' 19' 52" W, a distance of 83. 78 feet from the SE corner
of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of said Section, said point lying on the Northerly right of way line of
West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence N 63002' 21" E along the
Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 57. 24 feet; Thence S
87016' 56" E along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 17. 73 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence S 02° 48' 54"
W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 13. 28 feet
to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence Southwesterly along the
Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90001' 03", for a distance of 47. 13 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of S 47°49'25" W, and distance of 42.43 feet; Thence N
87° 10' 03" W along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 37. 41 feet; Thence N 02° 49' 57" E, a distance of 14. 81 feet to the Point of Beginning,
containing 0. 05 Acres more or less.

  18


Part of the SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 8, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the SW corner of said SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence N 29038' 05" E, a distance
of 51. 01 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence N 02019' 02" E along the Easterly right of way of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 1214. 34 feet to the intersection of the Easterly right of
way of said Razorback Road and the Southerly right of way line of Cleveland Street;
Thence N 87' 09' 15" W along the Southerly right of way line of said Cleveland Street, a
distance of 5. 66 feet to the Easterly proposed back of curb line of Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly proposed back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 29. 53 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 31 ° 36' 29", for a distance of 16. 29 feet, said curve having a
chord bearing of S 19023' 53" W, and distance of 16. 08 feet; S 02° 52' 26" W, a distance
of 171. 46 feet; S 05° 36' 04" E, a distance of 51. 06 feet to the Easterly back of curb line
of said Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: S 02023' 22" W, a distance of 497. 62 feet; S
02037' 37" W, a distance of 479. 33 feet; Thence S 87016' 56" E, a distance of 8. 23 feet to
the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 19 Acres more or less.

ROW Dedication Description




Part of the NE/ 4 NE1/ 4 and part of the SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, and part of the SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4 and
part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 18" W along the
West line of said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 309. 18 feet; Thence S 87° 16' 42" E, a
distance of 23.76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: S 02° 58' 57" W, a distance of 487. 50 feet; S 02° 40'22"
W, a distance of 608. 01 feet; S 02054' 03" W, a distance of 436. 29 feet; S 03001' 17" W,
a distance of 198. 13 feet; S 01 ° 25' 06" W, a distance of 214. 48 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a
distance of 95.61; Thence Southeasterly along the Northerly back of curb line of
Meadow Street along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
89030' 25", for a distance of 46. 87 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42° 02' 08"
E, and distance of 42. 24 feet; Thence S 01 046' 07" W, a distance of 31. 18 feet to the

Southerly back of curb line of said Meadow Street and the beginning of a circular curb
to the left; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 90029' 35", for a distance of 47.38 feet, said curve having a

chord bearing of S 47° 57' 52" W, and distance of 42. 61 feet; S 02043'04" W, a distance
of 88. 40 feet; S 03003' 35" W, a distance of 200. 01 feet; S 02054' 25" W, a distance of
322. 05 feet; Thence N 88° 04' 02" W, a distance of 17. 94 feet; Thence N 02032' 00" E, a
distance of 401. 68 feet to the SW corner of the aforesaid SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N

02' 35' 17" E along the West line of the said SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 124. 57 feet;
Thence N 86038' 48" W, a distance of 37. 23 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence N 02° 43' 04" E along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 85. 06 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly
back of curb line of said Razorback Road along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru
a central angle of 26045' 00", for a distance of 14. 01 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 10039' 26" W, and distance of 13. 88 feet; Thence N 02° 32' 00" E, a distance
of 34. 66 feet; Thence S 86040' 45" E, a distance of 40. 25 feet to the West line of the said
SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N 02° 35' 17" E along the West line of the said SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a
distance of 1056. 85 feet to the SW corner of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N 02° 43' 18" E
along the West line of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 769.53 feet; Thence S
87008' 22" E, a distance of 5. 84 feet; Thence N 02° 46' 31" E, a distance of 243. 50 feet to
a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence N
57028' 29" E along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
21. 67 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 1. 43 Acres more or less.
 Washington County, AR
 I certify this instrument was filed on
02/ 17/2023 10:30: 20 AM
and mOorded in Real Estate
File Number 2023- 00003981
Kyle Sylvester- Circuit Clerk
by = m
 CITY OF
 CITY COUNCIL MEMO
 FAYETTEVILLE
  Pow, ARKANSAS 2022- 262



MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2023

TO: Mayor Jordan and City Council
THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff
 Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director

FROM: Jessica Masters, Development Review Manager

DATE:


SUBJECT: VAC 22- 024 ( RAZORBACK RD. MAPLE ST., ETC.):




RECOMMENDATION:



BACKGROUND:

The subject property includes 6. 54 acres of right- of-way spread along portions of seven public streets adjacent
to University of Arkansas Property ( see attached survey). Most prominently, the right-of-way includes:

 Arts District: Three separate areas of right- of- way behind street curbs on the north, west, and east borders
of the new Arts District, along W. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, S. Hill Avenue, and S. LT. Col. Leroy Pond
Avenue.

 Former Highway 112: Multiple areas of right-of-way behind the curb along both the east and west sides of
Razorback Road, north and south sides of W. Maple Street, and east and west sides of Garland Avenue.

 Cleveland Street: Two areas of right-of-way along the south side of W. Cleveland Street, between N. Lindell
Avenue to the east and N. Razorback Road to the west.


Given the large number of properties associated with the right- of-way, adjacent zoning district information is
not provided. All properties adjacent to the request are owned by the University of Arkansas with uses varying
from parking and athletic facilities to housing and classrooms. A similar proposal was heard by the Planning
Commission in late 2021, but was tabled indefinitely at the applicant' s request to allow time to coordinate with
the City Attorney' s office. The applicant is bringing back a new request, with an additional portion of right- of-
way for consideration.

Proposal: The applicant proposes to vacate 18 separate pieces of public right of way totaling 6. 54 acres along
seven streets. In turn, a dedication of right- of-way totaling 1. 43 acres is proposed along Razorback Road and
between W. Nolan Richardson Drive to the south and W. Maple Street to the north. With this request, the
applicant noted in their letter that existing utilities will be protected through easement dedication. Additionally,
the applicant asserts that vacating the right- of-way will remove current and future sections of Senior Walk,
landscaping, lights, and trees from the City' s responsibility.

DISCUSSION:

At the December 12, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners voted to forward the item to City
Council with a recommendation of approval, with a vote of 8- 0- 0. Commissioner Garlock made the motion, and


Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville- ar. gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Commissioner Winston seconded. Finding that the conditions of approval covered previous concerns about
pedestrian access and maintenance, Commissioners found the request to vacate the right-of-way to be
acceptable. No public comment was offered on the item.

City staff and Planning Commission recommend approval of VAC- 2022- 0024 as shown in the attached
Exhibits ' A' and ' 13% and with the following conditions of approval:

1. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right- of-way vacation request,
with review and coordination by the applicant with the utility provider, including the client properly identifying
utilities in the field by means of surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with representatives.
2. Adequate accommodation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through easement or
agreement.
3. The applicant must dedicate right- of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of way does not
currently exist
4. The applicant must dedicate a pedestrian access easement to the existing back of sidewalk or master
street plan right of way in areas where sidewalk does not currently exist.
5.  Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right- of- way, or an easement be dedicated over the
areas where poles and appurtenances are located.
6. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
7. An agreement will need to be developed establishing responsibility ( or lack thereof) for repairs to non-
typical features behind the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any city facilities located within
vacated rights of way, including drainage facilities and water/ sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for
maintenance or repair of anything except a standard sidewalk.
8.  Any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/ developer' s expense.
9.  All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed by the City and
signed by the Mayor.




BUDGET/ STAFF IMPACT:

N/ A



ATTACHMENTS: SRF, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Applicant Request Letter, Petition to vacate, Survey, Planning
Commission Staff Report, VAC - 22- 024 RAZORBACK- MAPLE- GARLAND- CLEVELAND- HILL - RIGHT OF
WAY




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville- ar. gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form


 2022- 0262

 Legistar File ID


 1/ 3/ 2022

 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
 N/ A for Non -Agenda Item



 Jonathan Curth 12/ 16/ 2022 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW ( 630)


 Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department


 Action Recommendation:

  VAC- 2022- 0024: Vacation ( RAZORBACK RD., MLK BLVD., MAPLE ST., GARLAND AVE., CLEVELAND ST., HILL AVE., &

  LT. COL. LEROY POND AVE./ UA- ARTS ROW VACATION, 482/ 521/ 522): Submitted by DCI for portions of right- of- way
  located along Razorback Rd./ Maple St./ Garland Ave/ Cleveland St./ Hill Ave./ MLK Blvd./ Lt. Col. Leroy Pond Ave in
  WARDS 1 and 2. The rights -of -way are within or adjacent to property belonging to the University of Arkansas. The
  request is to vacate portions of existing street rights of way totaling approximately 6. 54 acres.



 Budget Impact:




 Account Number Fund




 Project Number Project Title



 Budgeted Item? No Current Budget $ -


 Funds Obligated $ -

 Current Balance


 Does item have a cost? No Item Cost $ -


 Budget Adjustment Attached? No Budget Adjustment $ -


 Remaining Budget



 V20210527

Purchase Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution #



Change Order Number: Approval Date:



Original Contract Number:



Comments:
EXHIBIT ' A' I VAC- 2022- 0024
 EXHIBIT ' B'
 VAC- 2022- 0024


ROW Vacation Description

 1


Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:



Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence S 60° 00' 27" E, a
distance of 525. 14 feet to the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 02040' 45" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Hill
Avenue, a distance of 36. 68 feet; Thence S 82020' 08" W, a distance of 11. 08 feet to a

point on the Easterly back of curb line of Hill Avenue; Thence N 02° 52' 05" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 36. 70 feet; Thence N 82° 20' 08" E, a
distance of 10. 96 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 01 acres more or less.


 2


Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:



Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence S 64° 05' 15" E, a
distance of 507. 77 feet to a point on the Easterly right of way line of Hill Avenue and the
Point of Beginning; Thence S 82° 20' 08" W, a distance of 10. 82 feet to a point on the
Easterly back of curb line of said Hill Avenue; Thence N 02° 52' 05" E along the said
Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 132. 06 feet; Thence N 02° 41' 12" E along the
said Easterly back of curb line, a distance of 362. 61 feet; Thence S 87° 10' 32" E, a
distance of 6. 48 feet to the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Hill Avenue the following three courses: S
02° 32' 37" W, a distance of 184. 79 feet; S 01 ° 43' 05" W, a distance of 193. 23 feet; S

02° 40' 45" W, a distance of 114. 72 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 09 acres
more or less.




Part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the NW corner of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21. Thence N 68° 47' 51"
E, a distance of 718. 90 feet to a point of the Southerly right of way line of M. L. K. JR
Boulevard; Thence S 86° 32' 38" E, a distance of 277. 65 feet to a point on the Southerly
right of way line of M. L. K. JR Boulevard; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
M. L. K. JR Boulevard the following three courses: S 03° 27' 22" W, a distance of 10. 00
feet; N 86032' 38" W, a distance of 277. 52 feet; N 02042' 49" E, a distance of 10. 00 feet

to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 06 acres more or less.



M

Part of the NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4 of Section 21 and part of the SE1/ 4 SW1/ 4 of Section 16 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:



Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 NW1/ 4; Thence N 77059' 30" E, a
distance of 1124. 85 feet the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of M. L. K. JR
Boulevard and the Westerly right of way line of Government Avenue and the Point of
Beginning; Thence S 86° 32' 38" E, a distance of 8. 00 feet to a point on the Westerly
back of curb line of said Government Avenue; Thence S 02028' 13" W along the said
Westerly back of curb line, a distance of 370. 23 feet; Thence S 82' 19, 51" W, a distance
of 19. 56 feet to the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Government Avenue the following three
courses: N 02° 31' 09" E, a distance of 208. 36 feet; S 87° 04' 21" E, a distance of 11. 07

feet; N 02° 28' 13" E, a distance of 165. 53 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 13
acres more or less.




 5


Part of the SE1/ 4 of Section 8 and part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17 all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the SE corner of said Section 8; Thence N 02° 53' 25" E along the East
line of said Section 8, a distance of 1260. 95 feet; Thence N 87° 09' 15" W, a distance of

117. 56 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the Point
of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street the
following bearings and distances: N 87' 09' 15" W, a distance of 478. 83 feet; N
02° 50' 45" E, a distance of 12. 44 feet; N 87' 09' 15" W, a distance of 715. 54 feet to a
point on the proposed Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street; Thence along
the Southerly back of curb line of said Clevland Street the following bearings and
distance: Northeasterly along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle
of 57° 21' 17", for a distance of 29. 53 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
63° 53' 14" E, and distance of 28. 31 feet; S 87° 26' 07" E, a distance of 805. 77 feet to the

beginning of a circular curve to the right; Southeasterly along a 5. 00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90° 00' 00",for a distance of 7. 85 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of S 42° 26' 07" E, and distance of 7. 07 feet; S 02° 33' 53" W, a distance
of 6. 83 feet; S 87° 26' 07" E, a distance of 386. 19 feet to the beginning of a circular curve
to the right, said point being at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb line of said
Clevland Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along
the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: Southeasterly along a 37. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central
angle of 89° 49' 41 ", for a distance of 58. 79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S
42° 31' 16" E, and distance of 52. 95 feet; Thence S 02° 23' 34" W, a distance of 736. 30
feet; Thence S 03010' 11" W, a distance of 391. 26 feet; Thence S 03' 10' 11" W, a

distance of 61. 13 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Westerly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly back of curb
line of West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 39. 50 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89° 20' 08", for a distance of 61. 59 feet,

said curve having a chord bearing of S 47' 50' 15" W, and distance of 55. 54 feet; N
87° 29' 41" W, a distance of 1184. 55 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right
at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback road the following bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a
30. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89° 59' 12", for a distance of
47. 12 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 42° 30' 05" W, and distance of 42. 42
feet; N 02° 29' 30" E, a distance of 20. 32 feet; Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb
line of said Razorback Road and along the Northerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distance: S 87° 16' 56" E, a distance of 36. 71
feet; S 32° 16' 27" E, a distance of 12. 21 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
85° 50' 33" E, a distance of 196. 14 feet; S 86° 17' 43" E, a distance of 367. 01 feet; N
58048' 06" E, a distance of 43. 32 feet; S 87056' 08" E, a distance of 61. 00 feet; S
53° 43' 12" E, a distance of 30. 23 feet; S 87° 56' 08" E, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
02003' 52" W, a distance of 10. 00 feet; S 87° 56' 08" E, a distance of 128. 00 feet; S
80' 44' 15" E, a distance of 27. 21 feet; S 87° 49' 55" E, a distance of 27. 57 feet; N
02003' 52" E, a distance of 10. 46 feet; S 87056' 08" E, a distance of 141. 43 feet; S
78° 00' 34" E, a distance of 29. 74 feet; S 87' 43' 15" E, a distance of 93. 43 feet to the
intersection of the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly
right of way line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 51 ° 46' 34" E, a distance of
53. 54 feet; N 08° 37' 03" E, a distance of 7. 95 feet; N 03° 14' 28" E, a distance of 238. 68
feet; N 41° 45' 32" W, a distance of 6. 15 feet; N 03° 14' 28" E, a distance of 77. 00 feet; N
48° 14' 28" E, a distance of 6. 15 feet; N 03° 14' 28" E, a distance of 136. 61 feet; N
02' 31' 16" E, a distance of 701. 38 feet; N 58' 12' 33" W, a distance of 51. 84 feet to the

Point of Beginning, containing 1. 67 Acres more or less.

 6


Part of the SW1/ 4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 74045' 30" E, a distance of
95. 94 feet to a point lying on the Northerly right of way line of West Maple Street and
the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03006' 30" W, a distance of 9. 11 feet to the intersection
of the Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street and the Easterly back of
curb line of Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said
Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances: N 86° 53' 30" W, a distance of
36. 05 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Northwesterly along a 39. 50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90° 03' 41 ", for a distance of 62. 09
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 41 °51' 40" W, and distance of 55. 89 feet; N
03° 10' 11" E, a distance of 65. 85 feet; N 03° 10' 11" E, a distance of 381. 32 feet; N

02023' 34" E, a distance of 10. 44 feet; Northeasterly along a 19. 50 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 51' 14' 11 ", for a distance of 17. 44 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of N 28000' 40" E, and distance of 16. 86 feet; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue and along the Easterly right of way
line of said Garland Avenue, S 02° 53' 25" W, a distance of 465. 30 feet to the intersection

of the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue and the Northerly right of way
line of aforesaid West Maple Street; Thence along the Northerly right of way line of said
West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: S 42° 55' 49" E, a distance of
43. 49 feet; S 74015' 21" E, a distance of 35. 89 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing
0. 12 Acres more or less.


 7


Part of the SW1/ 4 of Section 9, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville,
Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the SW corner of said Section 9; Thence N 02° 53' 25" E along the West
line of said Section 9, a distance of 1297. 88 feet; Thence S 87° 06' 35" E, a distance of

44. 78 feet to the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of Clevland Street and the
Easterly right of way line of Garland Avenue and the Point of Beginning; Thence along
the Easterly right of way line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and
distances: S 48° 20' 03" W, a distance of 27. 69 feet; S 02° 53' 40" W, a distance of 707. 66
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence along the Easterly
back of curb line of said Garland Avenue the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 19. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
52° 26' 46", for a distance of 17. 85 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23° 49' 49"
W, and distance of 17. 23 feet; N 02° 23' 34" E, a distance of 250. 85 feet; Thence leaving
the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue N 02° 23' 34" E, a distance of
209. 31 feet to a point on the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue; Thence
N 02° 23' 34" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland Avenue, a distance
of 229. 09 feet to the intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Garland
Avenue and the Southerly back of curb line of aforesaid Clevland Street and the
beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of
said Clevland Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 31. 50
feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 91 ° 00' 58", for a distance of 50. 04

feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 47° 54' 03" E, and distance of 44. 94 feet; S
86° 35' 28" E, a distance of 276. 96 feet; Thence leaving the Southerly back of curb line of
said Clevland Street, S 02053' 25" W, a distance of 6. 72 feet to a point lying on the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street; Thence N 87° 07' 28" W along the
Southerly right of way line of said Clevland Street, a distance of 275. 22 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0. 24 Acres more or less.




Part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of said Section 17; Thence S 02041' 08" W along the East
line of said Section 17, a distance of 44. 57 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of
way line of West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Southerly
right of way line of said West Maple Street the following bearings and distances: N
87° 56' 08" W, a distance of 529. 41 feet; S 02° 03' 52" W, a distance of 10. 00 feet; N
87° 56' 08" W, a distance of 45. 09 feet; S 29° 02' 41" W, a distance of 50. 50 feet; S

79° 37' 29" W, a distance of 17. 72 feet to the Easterly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence N 02037' 28" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive, a
distance of 49. 69 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection
of the Easterly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive and the Southerly back of curb
line of West maple Street; Thence along the Southerly back of curb line of said West
Maple Street the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30. 00 feet
radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 89° 52' 51 ", for a distance of 47. 06 feet,

said curve having a chord bearing of N 47033' 53" E, and distance of 42. 38 feet; S
87° 29' 41" E, a distance of 584. 19 feet; S 02° 41' 08" W, a distance of 16. 09 feet to the
Point of Beginning, containing 0. 31 Acres more or less.

 9


Part of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 18" W along the
West line of said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 309. 18 feet; Thence S 87° 16' 42" E, a
distance of 23. 76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence N 02058' 57" E along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road, a distance of 160. 23 feet to the beginning of a circular curve to the right at the
intersection of the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Southerly
back of curb line of West Maple Street; Thence Northeasterly along the Southerly back
of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 100. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 89° 31' 22", for a distance of 156. 25 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 47° 44' 38" E, and distance of 140. 83 feet; Thence S 87029' 41" E along the
Southerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 514. 79 feet to the
beginning of a circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Southerly back of curb
line of said West Maple Street and the Westerly back of curb line of Stadium Drive;
Thence Southeasterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive along
a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of 90° 07' 09", for a distance of
47. 19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42026' 07" E, and distance of 42.47
feet; Thence S 02° 37' 28" W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Stadium Drive,
a distance of 57. 35 feet to a point lying on the Southerly right of way line of said West
Maple Street; Thence along the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street
the following bearings and distances: S 79037' 29" W, a distance of 17. 02 feet; N
43° 37' 28" W, a distance of 44. 19 feet; N 43° 37' 28" W, a distance of 22. 24 feet; N
54003' 02" W, a distance of 48. 45 feet; N 85043' 19" W, a distance of 137. 52 feet; N
71 ° 49' 55" W, a distance of 7. 76 feet; N 86° 45' 54" W, a distance of 94. 00 feet; S
03014' 11" W, a distance of 14. 50 feet; N 86045' 49" W, a distance of 26. 00 feet;
Thence N 03° 14' 11" E, a distance of 14. 50 feet; N 86° 45' 50" W, a distance of 178. 59
feet; S 54° 43' 02" W, a distance of 69. 92 feet; S 36042' 58" W, a distance of 24. 53 feet to

the intersection of the Southerly right of way line of said West Maple Street and the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence S 02° 43' 04" W along the
Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 168. 40 feet; Thence S
57028' 29" W along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
34. 08 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 43 Acres more or less.


 10


Part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02° 43' 27" W along
the West line of said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4, a distance of 401. 69 feet; Thence S 88° 04' 02" E, a
distance of 19. 28 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 88° 04' 02" E, a distance of
26. 98 feet; S 02° 34' 31" W, a distance of 474. 04 feet; S 47' 17' 49" E, a distance of 35. 62
feet; S 07° 31' 38" W, a distance of 17. 21 feet to a point lying on the Northerly back of
curb line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence N 87° 28' 31" W along the Northerly back of
curb line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 17. 76 feet to the beginning of a
circular curve to the right at the intersection of the Northerly back of curb line of said
Nolan Richardson Drive and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: Northwesterly along a 29. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru
a central angle of 90° 07' 05", for a distance of 45. 61 feet, said curve having a chord
bearing of N 42° 24' 59" W, and distance of 41. 05 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of
84. 03 feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 51. 67 feet; N 00° 20' 35" E, a distance of 158. 49
feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 132. 04 feet; N 02° 54' 25" E, a distance of 58. 72 feet to

the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 30 Acres more or less.
 11


Part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 and part of the SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North,
Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:

Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 27" W along
the West line of the said NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4, a distance of 990. 51 feet; Thence S 87016' 33" E,

a distance of 41. 41 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Easterly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02037' 57" W, a distance of
191. 59 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 503. 00 feet; S 32048' 03" E, a distance of
15. 96 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 40. 50 feet; N 87022' 03" W, a distance of 8. 46
feet; S 02032' 57" W, a distance of 201. 50 feet; S 02° 46' 05" W, a distance of 308. 48 feet;
S 87022' 03" E, a distance of 9. 23 feet; S 04° 29' 42" E, a distance of 54. 63 feet; S
45° 45' 33" E, a distance of 15. 96 feet; S 76° 34' 38" E, a distance of 36. 68 feet; Thence S

88° 32' 28" W, a distance of 64. 27 feet to the to the Easterly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence along the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances:
Northwesterly along a 40. 00 feet radius curve to the right, thru a central angle of
51 ° 46' 46", for a distance of 36. 15 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 23° 14' 49"
W, and distance of 34. 93 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of 245. 78 feet; N 00' 39' 11" E,

a distance of 172. 82 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of 113. 63; Thence leaving the
Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of 86. 00
feet to the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road; Thence N 02° 38' 34" E
along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 35. 14 feet;
Thence leaving the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road N 02038' 34" E, a
distance of 157. 12 feet to a the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
bearings and distances: N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of 215. 84; N 04° 46' 38" E, a distance

of 161. 08 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of 125. 51 feet to the beginning of a circular
curve to the right; Northeasterly along a 34. 50 feet radius curve to the right, thru a
central angle of 89° 52' 55", for a distance of 54. 12 feet, said curve having a chord

bearing of N 47° 35' 01" E, and distance of 48. 74 feet; S 87028' 31" E, a distance of 4. 65

feet; Thence S 02° 31' 29" W, a distance of 17. 24 feet to a point lying on the Southerly
right of way line of Nolan Richardson Drive; Thence S 44° 34' 24" W along the Southerly
right of way line of said Nolan Richardson Drive, a distance of 36. 39 feet to the Point of
Beginning, containing 0. 64 Acres more or less.
 12


Part of the NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 and part of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16
North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 27" W, a
distance of 954. 57 feet; Thence N 87° 21' 26" W, a distance of 48. 50 feet to a point lying
on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence
along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and
distances: S 02041' 40" W, a distance of 885. 85 feet; S 42059' 26" W, a distance of
26. 15 feet; S 11' 00' 02" W, a distance of 60. 47 feet; S 02' 30' 15" W, a distance of 30. 08
feet; S 87022' 03" E, a distance of 31. 00 feet; S 02037' 57" W, a distance of 240. 00 feet;
S 07° 12' 24" W, a distance of 75. 24 feet; S 00° 52' 46" E, a distance of 13. 61 feet; S
15010' 00" W, a distance of 23. 86 feet; S 59011' 49" W, a distance of 60. 93 feet; Thence

N 88° 32' 28" E, a distance of 65. 11 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 39. 50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 43002' 25", for a distance of 29. 67 feet, said curve having
a chord bearing of N 24° 09' 42" E, and distance of 28. 98 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance
of 256. 33 feet; N 04037' 56" E, a distance of 172. 82 feet; N 02038' 34" E, a distance of
607. 73 feet; N 00° 30' 29" E, a distance of 161. 08 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance of
126. 25 feet; Northwesterly along a 33. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central
angle of 49° 41' 15", for a distance of 29. 05 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
22012' 04" W, and distance of 28. 15 feet; Thence N 87028' 31" W, a distance of 7. 18 feet

to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 76 Acres more or less.

 13


Part of the NW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 27" W along
the East line of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 43. 47 feet; Thence N 87° 16' 33" W,

a distance of 30. 92 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02' 05' 15" W, a distance of
192. 55 feet; S 02° 56' 28" W, a distance of 171. 14 feet; S 02° 56' 28" W, a distance of
52. 91 feet; N 87° 22' 08" W, a distance of 17. 55 feet; S 02° 37' 57" W, a distance of 70. 15
feet; Thence S 16° 40' 05" W, a distance of 28. 86 feet; S 02° 37' 57" W, a distance of
82. 00 feet; S 30° 42' 28" W, a distance of 17. 53 feet; S 03° 25' 24" W, a distance of 50. 00
feet; S 45° 00' 08" E, a distance of 21. 57 feet; S 03° 06' 51" W, a distance of 163. 01 feet;
S 09' 06' 16" W, a distance of 24. 47 feet; Thence S 87° 28' 31" E, a distance of 8. 84 feet

to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a circular
curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to
the left, thru a central angle of 46° 40' 08", for a distance of 24. 03 feet, said curve having

a chord bearing of N 25° 58' 38" E, and distance of 23. 37 feet; N 02° 38' 34" E, a distance
of 83. 71 feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 51. 61 feet; N 04° 40' 57" E, a distance of
158. 48 feet; N 02° 30' 46" E, a distance of 132. 20 feet; N 02° 54' 25" E, a distance of
380. 29 feet; N 00° 22' 40" W, a distance of 25. 69 feet to a circular curve to the left;

Northwesterly along a 27. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
23° 19' 03",
 for a distance of 11. 19 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 12002' 11"
W, and distance of 11. 11 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 23 Acres more or
less.


 14


Part of the SW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02035' 17" W along
the East line of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 545. 93 feet; Thence N 86° 40' 08"
W, a distance of 42. 18 feet to the Westerly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of said Razorback Road
the following bearings and distances: S 02° 52' 01" W, a distance of 302. 22 feet; S

86° 38' 50" E, a distance of 3. 21 feet; S 02° 32' 00" W, a distance of 179. 59 feet to a point
on the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the beginning of a
circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 30. 00 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 27° 36' 29", for a distance of 14. 46 feet, said
curve having a chord bearing of N 16° 31' 19" E, and distance of 14. 32 feet; N 02043' 04"
E, a distance of 9. 68 feet; Thence leaving said Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road and along the proposed Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: N 02° 43' 04" E, a distance of 85. 06 feet; N
04° 37' 24" E, a distance of 214. 63 feet; N 03' 01' 17" E, a distance of 140. 19 feet to the

beginning of a circular curve to the left on the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road along a 29. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
38° 31' 42", for a distance of 19. 84 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 16° 14' 34"
W, and distance of 19. 47 feet; Thence N 86040' 08" W, a distance of 7. 97 feet to the

Point of Beginning, containing 0. 11 Acres more or less.

 15


Part of the SW/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02° 35' 17" W along
the West line of the said SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 31. 42 feet; Thence N 87° 24' 43" W,
a distance of 35. 00 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way lien of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence S 03° 03' 28" W along the Westerly right of way
line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 469. 02 feet; Thence S 86° 40' 08" E, a

distance of 18. 37 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the
beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back of curb line of
said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly along a 23. 50
feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 34000' 59", for a distance of 13. 95
feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 19054' 33" E, and distance of 13. 75 feet; N
02054' 03" E, a distance of 417. 63 feet; Thence N 02040' 22" E, a distance of 6. 09 feet to

the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Northwesterly along a 35. 50 feet radius
curve to the left, thru a central angle of 65048' 22", for a distance of 40. 77 feet, said

curve having a chord bearing of N 30013' 49" W, and distance of 38. 57 feet to the Point
of Beginning, containing 0. 23 Acres more or less.

 16


Part of the NW/4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the NE corner of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02° 43' 18" W along
the West line of the said NW1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 35. 57 feet; Thence N 87015' 25" W,

a distance of 98.42 feet to a point lying on the Westerly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence along the Westerly right of way line of
Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: S 02043' 04" W, a distance of
16. 99 feet; S 87016' 56" E, a distance of 23. 00 feet; S 48° 06' 31" E, a distance of 34. 83
feet; S 02059' 34" E, a distance of 40. 20 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 83. 09 feet; S
32° 43' 04" W, a distance of 22. 48 feet; S 55046' 02" E, a distance of 8. 49 feet; S
02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 58. 00 feet; N 87° 16' 56" W, a distance of 15. 00 feet; S
02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 20. 00 feet; S 22017' 57" E, a distance of 33. 11 feet; S
08° 25' 42" W, a distance of 60. 30 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 164. 00 feet; S
62053' 17" W, a distance of 23. 05 feet; S 02043' 04" W, a distance of 26. 97 feet; N
87° 16' 56" W, a distance of 49. 00 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 20. 56 feet; S
87016' 56" E, a distance of 64. 00 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 52. 51 feet; S
87° 08' 22" E, a distance of 26. 12 feet; S 02° 46' 31" W, a distance of 668. 51 feet; Thence

S 87012' 53" E, a distance of 3. 08 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback
Road and the beginning of a circular curve to the left; Thence along the Westerly back
of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances: Northeasterly
along a 32. 50 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 63° 06' 05", for a
distance of 35. 79 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N 34013' 24" E, and distance
of 34. 01 feet; N 02° 40' 22" E, a distance of 507. 98 feet; N 02058, 57" E, a distance of

647. 83 feet; N 02° 58' 57" E, a distance of 88. 90 feet to the beginning of a circular curve
to the left; Northwesterly along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle
of 90009' 00", for a distance of 47. 20 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of N
42° 05' 33" W, and distance of 42. 48 feet; N 87' 10' 03" W, a distance of 57. 37 feet;

Thence S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance of 5. 88 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 97
Acres more or less.


 17


Part of the NW/ 4 NE1/ 4 of Section 17 and part of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 8, all in
Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas,
being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point that lies N 80019' 52" W, a distance of 83. 78 feet from the SE corner
of the SW1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of said Section, said point lying on the Northerly right of way line of
West Maple Street and the Point of Beginning; Thence N 63002' 21" E along the
Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance of 57. 24 feet; Thence S
87016' 56" E along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 17. 73 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of Razorback Road; Thence S 02° 48' 54"
W along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 13. 28 feet
to the beginning of a circular curve to the right; Thence Southwesterly along the
Northerly back of curb line of said West Maple Street along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to
the right, thru a central angle of 90° 01' 03", for a distance of 47. 13 feet, said curve
having a chord bearing of S 47049' 25" W, and distance of 42. 43 feet; Thence N
87° 10' 03" W along the Northerly right of way line of said West Maple Street, a distance
of 37. 41 feet; Thence N 02049' 57" E, a distance of 14. 81 feet to the Point of Beginning,
containing 0. 05 Acres more or less.

 18


Part of the SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 8, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:


Commencing at the SW corner of said SE1/ 4 SE1/ 4; Thence N 29038' 05" E, a distance
of 51. 01 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback Road and the
Point of Beginning; Thence N 02019' 02" E along the Easterly right of way of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 1214. 34 feet to the intersection of the Easterly right of
way of said Razorback Road and the Southerly right of way line of Cleveland Street;
Thence N 87° 09' 15" W along the Southerly right of way line of said Cleveland Street, a
distance of 5. 66 feet to the Easterly proposed back of curb line of Razorback Road;
Thence along the Easterly proposed back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 29. 53 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 31 ° 36' 29", for a distance of 16. 29 feet, said curve having a

chord bearing of S 19° 23' 53" W, and distance of 16. 08 feet; S 02° 52' 26" W, a distance
of 171. 46 feet; S 05° 36' 04" E, a distance of 51. 06 feet to the Easterly back of curb line
of said Razorback Road; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback
Road the following bearings and distances: S 02° 23' 22" W, a distance of 497.62 feet; S
02° 37' 37" W, a distance of 479. 33 feet; Thence S 87° 16' 56" E, a distance of 8. 23 feet to

the Point of Beginning, containing 0. 19 Acres more or less.


ROW Dedication Description




Part of the NE/ 4 NE1/ 4 and part of the SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, and part of the SW1/ 4 NE1/ 4 and
part of the NE1/ 4 SE1/ 4 of Section 17, Township 16 North, Range 30 West, City of
Fayetteville, Washington County, Arkansas, being more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the NW of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence S 02043' 18" W along the
West line of said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 309. 18 feet; Thence S 87016' 42" E, a

distance of 23. 76 feet to a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback
Road and the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of
Beginning; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: S 02058' 57" W, a distance of 487. 50 feet; S 02040' 22"
W, a distance of 608. 01 feet; S 02° 54' 03" W, a distance of 436. 29 feet; S 03° 01' 17" W,
a distance of 198. 13 feet; S 01 ° 25' 06" W, a distance of 214. 48 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a

distance of 95. 61; Thence Southeasterly along the Northerly back of curb line of
Meadow Street along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
89° 30' 25", for a distance of 46. 87 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S 42° 02' 08"
E, and distance of 42. 24 feet; Thence S 01 ° 46' 07" W, a distance of 31. 18 feet to the
Southerly back of curb line of said Meadow Street and the beginning of a circular curb
to the left; Thence along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the
following bearings and distances: Southwesterly along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the
left, thru a central angle of 90° 29' 35", for a distance of 47. 38 feet, said curve having a

chord bearing of S 47° 57' 52" W, and distance of 42. 61 feet; S 02° 43' 04" W, a distance
of 88. 40 feet; S 03003' 35" W, a distance of 200. 01 feet; S 02° 54' 25" W, a distance of
322. 05 feet; Thence N 88004' 02" W, a distance of 17. 94 feet; Thence N 02032' 00" E, a
distance of 401. 68 feet to the SW corner of the aforesaid SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N

02035' 17" E along the West line of the said SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 124. 57 feet;
Thence N 86038' 48" W, a distance of 37. 23 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road; Thence N 02° 43' 04" E along the Westerly back of curb line of said
Razorback Road, a distance of 85. 06 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Westerly
back of curb line of said Razorback Road along a 30. 00 feet radius curve to the left, thru
a central angle of 26° 45' 00", for a distance of 14. 01 feet, said curve having a chord

bearing of N 10' 39' 26" W, and distance of 13. 88 feet; Thence N 02032' 00" E, a distance
of 34. 66 feet; Thence S 86° 40' 45" E, a distance of 40. 25 feet to the West line of the said

SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N 02° 35' 17" E along the West line of the said SE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a
distance of 1056. 85 feet to the SW corner of the NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4; Thence N 02° 43' 18" E

along the West line of the said NE1/ 4 NE1/ 4, a distance of 769. 53 feet; Thence S
87° 08' 22" E, a distance of 5. 84 feet; Thence N 02° 46' 31" E, a distance of 243. 50 feet to

a point lying on the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road; Thence N
57° 28' 29" E along the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road, a distance of
21. 67 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing 1. 43 Acres more or less.
 Written request and narrative to accompany Right -of -Way Vacation
 University of Arkansas, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
To: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and
 The Fayetteville City Council

On behalf of the landowners, I am petitioning the Fayetteville City Planning Commission and the Fayetteville City Council to
vacate/ reduce portions of ROW in the areas described below:

Razorback Rd: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb from MLKJr Blvd to Maple St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side just north of Mitchell St); and east of the east back of curb from Maple St to
Cleveland St. Excluding any vacation of the existing ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, north of Center Street
adjacent to the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas property.

Maple St: Vacating ROW north of the north back of curb and south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Garland
Ave



Garland Ave: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb, from Maple St to Cleveland St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side between Douglas St and Cleveland St)

Cleveland St: Vacating ROW south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Lindell Ave

Hill Ave: Vacating ROW east of the east back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the alley along the north side of the National
Cemetery property

Lt Col Leroy Pond: Vacating ROW west of the proposed back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the Railroad ROW containing
the City trail

MLKJr Blvd: Vacating the 10' strip of ROW along the south side of MLKJr Blvd in the center of the block between Hill Ave
and Lt Col Leroy Pond

The University of Arkansas is the only abutting land owner to the rights of way sought to be vacated/ reduced. By granting this
vacation request, the current owners would benefit, and no other landowner would be adversely affected.

Pedestrian Access Easements will be dedicated to the City to the back of sidewalks along the streets.

Where storm drainage systems, water mains, and sewer mains exist within the proposed vacated areas: drainage, water, and
sewer easements will be dedicated to the City. Other utilities located within the proposed vacated areas will receive written
easements for their continued use, maintenance, & repair/ replacement.




The public interest and welfare would not be adversely affected by granting this vacation request.

The vacation/ reduction of the rights of way described above would benefit the City of Fayetteville by removing the senior
sidewalks, sidewalks, side paths, lights, trees, signs, drive aprons, etc from required city maintenance and repair/ replacement,
thus saving the taxpayers and allowing money allocated for this purpose to be used where needed elsewhere. Those obligations
would by conveyed unto the University of Arkansas.

Included in the Petition Packet is:
 1 Application and Payment of applicable fees for processing the application $ 205. 00.
 2 Legal description of areas to be vacated
 3 Exhibit Maps
 4 This Letter
 5 Owner' s consent
 6 Authorization Letter
 7 County Parcel Map Copies
 8 Petition to Vacate ROW
 9 Utility Company Comments




Allen Jay Youn , Develop nt Consultants, Inc.
PETITION TO VACATE/ REDUCE STREET RIGHTS OF WAY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 8, 9, 16, 17 & 21, T16N,
R30W, IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS


TO: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and
 The Fayetteville City Council

We, the undersigned, being all the owners of the real estate abutting the street rights of way hereinafter sought to be
abandoned/ vacated/ reduced, lying in sections 8, 9, 16, 17 & 21, T16N, R30W, in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, a
municipal corporation, petition to vacate the street rights -of -way which are described as follows:

Razorback Rd: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb from MLKJr Blvd to Maple St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side just north of Mitchell St); and east of the east back of curb from Maple St to
Cleveland St. Excluding any vacation of the existing ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, north of Center Street
adjacent to the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas property.

Maple St: Vacating ROW north of the north back of curb and south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Garland
Ave



Garland Ave: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb, from Maple St to Cleveland St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side between Douglas St and Cleveland St)

Cleveland St: Vacating ROW south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Lindell Ave

Hill Ave: Vacating ROW east of the east back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the alley along the north side of the National
Cemetery property

Lt Col Leroy Pond: Vacating ROW west of the proposed back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the Railroad ROW containing
the City trail

MLKJr Blvd: Vacating the 10' strip of ROW along the south side of MLKJr Blvd in the center of the block between Hill Ave
and Lt Col Leroy Pond

That the abutting real estate affected by said abandonment/ vacation/ reduction of the street rights of way are various tracts of
land owned by the University of Arkansas in the City of Fayetteville, the rights of way are only being abandoned to the extents
noted in the description above thus reducing the street rights of way and not eliminating them, that the affected streets will
continue to have unaffected vehicular traffic, and that the public interest and welfare would not be adversely affected by the
abandonment/ vacation/ reduction of portions of the above described street rights of way.

The petitioners pray that the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject,
however, to the existing storm drainage easements, water easements and sewer easements as required, and that the above
described real estate be used for their respective benefit and purpose as now approved by law.

The petitioners further pray that the above described real estate be vested in the abutting property owners as provided by law.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners respectfully pray that the governing body of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject to said storm drainage easements, water easements and
sewer easements, and that title to said real estate sought to be abandoned be vested in the abutting property owners as provided
by law, and as to that particular land the owners be free from the easements of the public for the use of said right of way.

Dated this - Lday of NoV- CMht r 20 J.


 u Printed
Name Signature
 MATCH LINE




 Esa. RNER




 I„ bI
 RCW- CATION# I

 I
 0




 NOIµ RICHZ—N
 I= n
 O.B. TION %11

 IP.



 NORTHWEST C

 E SE} SEa RNER




 ROW Dedication Area




 ROW Vacation Area




 III




 L. K. Jr BLVD
 h- ae:
 lM. Noh.
 non orona noun ornoSE: dj> all OW1..


 N
 m soyn: weMagemmooas n Ra oroaa SIioc eaare e.
 s, Row vasema al r d eeame e: pro on area eemreen owgia: spa




200 100 0 100 200

 80 =

 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 100' EC, RNER
 V I CLEVELAET CLEVELAND STREET



 OWVACa' ory

 Row

 ATOR




 o




 I

 I

 W


 D
 Z
 uU
 L I ow vacanouw




 p
 I
 cQ




 POB




 RowvacanouHWEST ervel rvy HER
 oR,,. T,, R3ow

 R.ROW
 a.a. nou
 W MAPLE STREET




 II I I




 nou oreoa onnwnose., 11— Rowia: nowI.-.n.
 ub.


 Row a a pl Ed OR,—

 ocorca




 ROW Dedication Area




 ROW Vacation Area




 I




 MATCH LINE
LATCH LINE
 200 too 0 100 200




 I lIII I GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 100'
e




 PAI




 LU
 ozzo ow

 U?w UZ
 w r
 zz )
 CITY OF

 FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO
  PF ARKANSAS




TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission

FROM: Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager


MEETING DATE: December 12, 2022


SUBJECT: VAC- 2022- 0024: Vacation ( RAZORBACK RD., MILK BLVD., MAPLE
 ST., GARLAND AVE., CLEVELAND ST., HILL AVE., & LT. COL. LEROY
 POND AVEJUA- ARTS ROW VACATION, 482/ 521/ 522): Submitted by
 DCI for portions of right- of-way located along Razorback Rd./ Maple
 St./ Garland Ave/ Cleveland St./ Hill Ave./ MLK Blvd./ Lt. Col. Leroy Pond Ave.
 The rights -of -way are within or adjacent to property belonging to the
 University of Arkansas. The request is to vacate portions of existing street
 rights of way totaling approximately 6. 54 acres.


RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends forwarding VAC- 2022- 0024 to City Council with a recommendation of
approval, with conditions.


RECOMMENDED MOTION:
 I move to forward VAC- 2022- 0024 with a recommendation of approval, with conditions as
recommended by staff."

BACKGROUND:

The subject property includes 6. 54 acres of right- of- way spread along portions of seven public
streets adjacent to University of Arkansas Property ( see attached survey). Most prominently, the
right- of-way includes:

 Arts District: Three separate areas of right- of-way behind street curbs on the north, west,
 and east borders of the new Arts District, along W. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, S.
 Hill Avenue, and S. LT. Col. Leroy Pond Avenue.
 Former Highway 112: Multiple areas of right- of-way behind the curb along both the east
 and west sides of Razorback Road, north and south sides of W. Maple Street, and east
 and west sides of Garland Avenue.
 Cleveland Street: Two areas of right- of-way along the south side of W. Cleveland Street,
 between N. Lindell Avenue to the east and N. Razorback Road to the west.


Given the large number of properties associated with the right- of-way, adjacent zoning district
information is not provided. All properties adjacent to the request are owned by the University of
Arkansas with uses varying from parking and athletic facilities to housing and classrooms. A
similar proposal was heard by the Planning Commission in late 2021, but was tabled indefinitely
at the applicant' s request to allow time to coordinate with the City Attorney' s office. The applicant
is bringing back a new request, with an additional portion of right- of-way for consideration.



 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 Agenda Item 6
 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 1 of 10
Proposal: The applicant proposes to vacate 18 separate pieces of public right of way totaling 6. 54
acres along seven streets. In turn, a dedication of right- of-way totaling 1. 43 acres is proposed
along Razorback Road and between W. Nolan Richardson Drive to the south and W. Maple Street
to the north. With this request, the applicant noted in their letter that existing utilities will be
protected through easement dedication. Additionally, the applicant asserts that vacating the right-
of-way will remove current and future sections of Senior Walk, landscaping, lights, and trees from
the City's responsibility.

DISCUSSION:

For several years, the University of Arkansas expressed interest to City staff in achieving greater
flexibility to program their property frontages along public streets. This is with the intent of using
the land outside of the street and behind the curb for additional landscaping, alternative paving
options, extended areas of Senior Walk, or other opportunities. While this was originally proposed
as an agreement, the University ultimately submitted a request to vacate the subject right-of-way.
Staff finds that if existing utilities and access are adequately protected, the proposal can promote
the University' s interests and remove areas from City maintenance. None of the 18 portions of
right- of-way proposed for vacation encroach on driving lanes and all adjoin University property.

Vacation Approval: The applicant has submitted the required vacation forms to the relevant City
departments and franchise utility companies with the following responses in 2021; the applicant
re -affirmed and made some modifications to the utility providers' conditions with this request in
2022. As the petitioner and sole landowner adjacent to the subject right- of-way, adjacent property
owner consent is not an applicable standard.


Utility Response


Cox Communications No objections, provided any damage or relocation of existing Cox
 facilities will be at the expense of the applicant.


AEP/ SWEPCO No objections,  provided easement be dedicated for existing
 facilities associated with this right- of-way vacation request.

Black Hills Energy AR No objections, provided that easements along existing lines shall
 be drafted for Black Hills Energy review, then recorded ( retaining
 same recording position as currently exists, if any).

AT& T No objections, provided dedicated easements are recorded by
 client properly identifying ATT utilities in the field by means of
 surveying, pot holing, and coordinating with ATT representatives.
 A 10- foot utility easement at ATT existing utility locations a
 dedicated corridor for backbone placements. Further, ATT

 requests that any relocation/ movement of ATT facilities will be at
 the cost of the petitioner, and that a permanent TELCO utility
 easement will be provided to cover all existing ATT facilities along
 the described route.


Ozarks Electric No objections and no comment.


City of Fayetteville Response


Water/ Sewer No objections, provided easements are dedicated as needed for
 existing water and sewer lines.


 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 Agenda Item 6
 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 2 of 10
Solid Waste & Recycling No objections and no comment.


Transportation No objections, provided adequate accommodation is provided for
 pedestrian access, whether through easement or agreement.
 Transportation will also require the dedication of Right of Way to
 the back of curb in any areas where right of way does not currently
 exist and the dedication of a pedestrian access easement to the
 existing back of sidewalk or master street plan right of way in
 areas where sidewalk does not currently exist. Signal poles and
 appurtenances need to remain in the right of way, or an easement
 be dedicated over the areas where poles and appurtenances are
 located. Drainage easements are needed in areas of existing
 drainage facilities. An agreement will need to be developed

 establishing responsibility ( or lack thereof) for repairs to non-
 typical features behind the curb due to maintenance, installation,

 and repair of any city facilities located within vacated rights of
 way, including drainage facilities and water/sewer lines.

Public Comment. Staff has received inquiries about the request, but no statements of support or

opposition. Given the scope of the request, staff required posting of ten public notification signs.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding VAC- 2022- 0024 to City Council with a
recommendation of approval, with the following conditions:

Conditions of Approval:


 1. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right- of-way
 vacation request, with review and coordination by the applicant with the utility provider,
 including the client properly identifying utilities in the field by means of surveying, pot
 holing, and coordinating with representatives.
 2. Adequate accommodation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through
 easement or agreement.
 3. The applicant must dedicate right- of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of
 way does not currently exist
 4. The applicant must dedicate a pedestrian access easement to the existing back of
 sidewalk or master street plan right of way in areas where sidewalk does not currently
 exist.
 5. Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right- of-way, or an easement be
 dedicated over the areas where poles and appurtenances are located.
 6. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
 7. An agreement will need to be developed establishing responsibility ( or lack thereof) for
 repairs to non - typical features behind the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair

 of any city facilities located within vacated rights of way, including drainage facilities and
 water/sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for maintenance or repair of anything
 except a standard sidewalk.
 8. Any damage or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property owner/ developer' s
 expense.

 9. All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed

 by the City and signed by the Mayor.




 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 Agenda Item 6
 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 3 of 10
 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES


 Date: December 12, 2022 O Tabled O Forwarded O Denied


 Motion:


 Second:


 Vote:




BUDGET/ STAFF IMPACT:
None


Attachments:
 Applicant Request Letter
 Applicant Petition to Vacate
 Site Exhibit — ROW to be vacated

 Overall Map




 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 Agenda Item 6
 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 4 of 10
 Written request and narrative to accompany Right -of -Way Vacation
 University of Arkansas, City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
To: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and
 The Fayetteville City Council

On behalf of the landowners, I am petitioning the Fayetteville City Planning Commission and the Fayetteville City Council to
vacate/ reduce portions of ROW in the areas described below:

Razorback Rd: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb from MLKJr Blvd to Maple St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side just north of Mitchell St); and east of the east back of curb from Maple St to
Cleveland St. Excluding any vacation of the existing ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, north of Center Street
adjacent to the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas property.

Maple St: Vacating ROW north of the north back of curb and south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Garland
Ave



Garland Ave: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb, from Maple St to Cleveland St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side between Douglas St and Cleveland St)

Cleveland St: Vacating ROW south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Lindell Ave

Hill Ave: Vacating ROW east of the east back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the alley along the north side of the National
Cemetery property

Lt Col Leroy Pond: Vacating ROW west of the proposed back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the Railroad ROW containing
the City trail

MLKJr Blvd: Vacating the 10' strip of ROW along the south side of MLKJr Blvd in the center of the block between Hill Ave
and Lt Col Leroy Pond

The University of Arkansas is the only abutting land owner to the rights of way sought to be vacated/ reduced. By granting this
vacation request, the current owners would benefit, and no other landowner would be adversely affected.

Pedestrian Access Easements will be dedicated to the City to the back of sidewalks along the streets.

Where storm drainage systems, water mains, and sewer mains exist within the proposed vacated areas: drainage, water, and
sewer easements will be dedicated to the City. Other utilities located within the proposed vacated areas will receive written
easements for their continued use, maintenance, & repair/ replacement.




The public interest and welfare would not be adversely affected by granting this vacation request.

The vacation/ reduction of the rights of way described above would benefit the City of Fayetteville by removing the senior
sidewalks, sidewalks, side paths, lights, trees, signs, drive aprons, etc from required city maintenance and repair/ replacement,
thus saving the taxpayers and allowing money allocated for this purpose to be used where needed elsewhere. Those obligations
would by conveyed unto the University of Arkansas.

Included in the Petition Packet is:
 1 Application and Payment of applicable fees for processing the application $ 205. 00.
 2 Legal description of areas to be vacated
 3 Exhibit Maps
 4 This Letter
 5 Owner' s consent
 6 Authorization Letter
 7 County Parcel Map Copies
 8 Petition to Vacate ROW
 9 Utility Company Comments




Allen Jay Youn , Develop nt Consultants, Inc.



 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 Agenda Item 6
 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)

 Page 5 of 10
PETITION TO VACATE/ REDUCE STREET RIGHTS OF WAY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 8, 9, 16, 17 & 21, T16N,
R30W, IN THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS


TO: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and
 The Fayetteville City Council

We, the undersigned, being all the owners of the real estate abutting the street rights of way hereinafter sought to be
abandoned/ vacated/ reduced, lying in sections 8, 9, 16, 17 & 21, T16N, R30W, in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, a
municipal corporation, petition to vacate the street rights -of -way which are described as follows:

Razorback Rd: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb from MLKJr Blvd to Maple St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side just north of Mitchell St); and east of the east back of curb from Maple St to
Cleveland St. Excluding any vacation of the existing ROW along the west side of Razorback Rd, north of Center Street
adjacent to the Islamic Center of Northwest Arkansas property.

Maple St: Vacating ROW north of the north back of curb and south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Garland
Ave



Garland Ave: Vacating ROW west of the west back of curb and east of the east back of curb, from Maple St to Cleveland St
 and including the bus pull off area on the east side between Douglas St and Cleveland St)

Cleveland St: Vacating ROW south of the south back of curb, from Razorback Rd to Lindell Ave

Hill Ave: Vacating ROW east of the east back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the alley along the north side of the National
Cemetery property

Lt Col Leroy Pond: Vacating ROW west of the proposed back of curb, south of MLKJr Blvd to the Railroad ROW containing
the City trail

MLKJr Blvd: Vacating the 10' strip of ROW along the south side of MLKJr Blvd in the center of the block between Hill Ave
and Lt Col Leroy Pond

That the abutting real estate affected by said abandonment/ vacation/ reduction of the street rights of way are various tracts of
land owned by the University of Arkansas in the City of Fayetteville, the rights of way are only being abandoned to the extents
noted in the description above thus reducing the street rights of way and not eliminating them, that the affected streets will
continue to have unaffected vehicular traffic, and that the public interest and welfare would not be adversely affected by the
abandonment/ vacation/ reduction of portions of the above described street rights of way.

The petitioners pray that the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject,
however, to the existing storm drainage easements, water easements and sewer easements as required, and that the above
described real estate be used for their respective benefit and purpose as now approved by law.

The petitioners further pray that the above described real estate be vested in the abutting property owners as provided by law.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned petitioners respectfully pray that the governing body of the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, abandon and vacate the above described real estate, subject to said storm drainage easements, water easements and
sewer easements, and that title to said real estate sought to be abandoned be vested in the abutting property owners as provided
by law, and as to that particular land the owners be free from the easements of the public for the use of said right of way.

Dated this - Lday of NoV- CMht r 20 J.


 u Printed
Name Signature




Planning




 Commission December
 12,2022 Agenda
 Item 6 VAR-
 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS) Page
 6 of 10
 MATCH LINE




 DITHEsaNQ RNER




 I„ bI
 RCW- CATION#,

 I
 0




 NO- RIOHZ.—
 I= n
 O.B. TION %11

 IP.



 NORTHWEST C

 E SE} SEa RNER




 E. P -




 INO
 ROW Dedication Area




 I


 Ic ROW Vacation Area




 III


 ml inn
 Ern au oreamroea kma. m mrub ml a aa.


 L. K. Jr BLVD - I— . 11, Nna aIlS1


 lM. Nph.
 Rp Drapa BNaAD — sa: aia> alRow.. h. N n rappae.

 msoy Ro,w weRoroa e a N amoas Mage&
 n:




 V.- a al aime 1.— p. li on area enVea D.S-Sia a1. dS— apa=
 Ra..— IRa. Planning Commission December
 12,2022
 Agenda Item 6
 ER VAR- 2022-
200 100 0 100 200

 of 0024 (
 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS) BED o s
 GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 100'
 SO=sPage 710 N R3ow
 V I LJ L, _ CLEVELAND STREET CLEVELAND STREET



 OWVACa' ory

 Row

 ATOR




 o




 I

 I

 W


 D
 Z
 uU
 L I ow vacanouw




 p
 I
 cQ




 POB




 RowvacanouHWEST ervel rvy HER
 oR,,. T,, R3ow

 R.ROW
 a.a. nou
 W MAPLE STREET


 ww-ftw_+
 l, I




 II I I




 nou oreoa onnwnose., 11— Rowia: nowI.-.n.
 ub.


 Row a a pl Ed OR,—

 ocorca




 ROW Dedication Area




 ROW Vacation Area




 I




 Planning Commission
 December 12, 2022
 MATCH LINE
LATCH LINE Agenda Item 6
 T" 1
 VAI- 2022- 06^ " djj 41 MSAS)

 I lI I I I'
 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 •• =
 100Page 8 of 10
e




 Lu
 ozzo ow
 Planning mission
 U?w UZ
 w r Decemb@ 12, 2022
 zz )

 Aaenda Item 6
 rd


 VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 9 of 10
 Agenda Item 6

VAR- 2022- 0024 ( UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS)
 Page 10 of 10
ORDINANCE NO.


AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE VAC 22- 024 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG
RAZORBACK ROAD, MAPLE STREET, GARLAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND STREET,
HILL AVENUE, MARTIN LUTHER KING JUNIOR BOULEVARD AND LT. COLONEL
LEROY POND AVENUE IN WARDS 1 AND 2 TO VACATE PORTIONS OF STREET
RIGHTS -OF -WAY


WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority under A.C. A. § 14- 54- 104 to vacate public
grounds or portions thereof which are not required for corporate purposes; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the following described portions of street
rights -of -way is not required for corporate purposes.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:


Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby vacates the
portions of street rights -of -way as described in Exhibit B attached to the Planning Department' s
memo.




Section 2: A copy of this Ordinance duly certified by the City Clerk along with the map
attached as Exhibit A to the Planning Department' s memo shall be filed in the office of the
Washington County Circuit Clerk.

Section 3: This vacation approval is subject to the following conditions:

 1. Easements shall be dedicated for any existing facilities associated with this right- of-way
 vacation request, with review and coordination by the applicant with the utility provider,
 including properly identifying utilities in the field by means of surveying, pot holing, and
 coordinating with representatives.
 2. Adequate accommodation for pedestrian access must be maintained whether through
 easement or agreement.

 3. The applicant must dedicate right-of-way to the back of curb in any areas where right of
 way does not currently exist.
 4. The applicant must dedicate a pedestrian access easement to the existing back of
 sidewalk or master street plan right of way in areas where sidewalk does not currently
 exist.
 5. Signal poles and appurtenances must remain in the right- of-way, or an easement be
 dedicated over the areas where poles and appurtenances are located.
 6. Drainage easements must be dedicated in areas of existing drainage facilities.
 7. An agreement will need to be developed establishing responsibility for repairs to non-
 typical features behind the curb due to maintenance, installation, and repair of any city
 facilities located within vacated rights of way, including drainage facilities and
 water/ sewer lines. The City will not be responsible for maintenance or repair of anything
 except a standard sidewalk.
8. Any damage to or relocation of existing facilities will be at the property
 owner/ developer' s expense.
9. All easements and agreements required as a condition of this vacation shall be reviewed

 by the City and signed by the Mayor.
 RECEIVED
 FEB 15 20: J

 NORTHWEST ARKAI- AS IMR" ORME' D• dmance: 661g
 m2M2- 262 DVm®



 c a c e ETGi ETC'
 VAC 22M GAZORBACK MY MAPLE ST,
 ANAPPROVE
 ORDM VAC 22-0 ERWLOCATEOALONG

 G1?
 STREET, 4ARWNDAVENUE
 DO•" ICCONGAIXTROAD, CLEW AFFIDAVIT
 CLBVEWNDSTREBT.




 EBEAS, Aeo' CouneJbu Neadden, wM
 OF PUBLICATION N A C A.t 1454- 1 W W set le public omlde
 p pomons IMro(wNOM1 ve nd rtgwn 1,


Paola Lopez, do solemnly swear that I am the Ac ounting Legal Clerk of the fu rWSM^
 oryon me
 thees'ennabb
 Cits:and
 cn cast., has deldar-, mldedwwa'
 Camm l Northwest
Arkansas Democrat-Gazette,adail new Nerninedemnbed printed rintedand
 y sylavdred gin, ideo,
 pmntlepmposn.
 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY
 published in

said County, State of Arkansas; that I was so related to this NOW, THEREFORE' COIMCIL OF THE CITY OF ublication at
 sectical: donflos

P and durin the publicationg of FAYET EVIL E,
 the annexedlegal advertisement ARKA
 P NSAS. g i9Cwdl. fdecyof the matter

of:Notice pending in the Court, in said County, and at the dates of o il' ce„ ";° a the several
publications of said advertisement stated below,and that during said a. obeabe the Pluming oepmanedr, mama. periods and
 M1, s Ordu nceduly wed 6
 the o' cic,4 alodgnuab d e onsp circulation in
at said dates, said newspaper was printed and had a bona fide Sooddi Ampyuf, EGdeIAPo Ne Pluuii"g Dep, d,
said County; that said newspaper had been regularly printed and nimcbed u ea s m—. aban ne
 comar egad CIs'.see0on 2.
 film m the Ifieepr period of

 published
said County, and had a bona fide circulation therein for the p the Wtlbnoa in  TNs v a z e t i o ^ WP N l s wb;Mb one month before

the date of the first publication of said advertisement; and that das I f°gIId""FathemeMsa" I be cohered fer said advertisement was
 w;
 th than ngJdo and wry...nuts,
published in the regular daily issues of said newspaper etyealeung fadbnea easocianal M1 renew as stated below. w"


eamdaeDnn by dte. p I.. with de, diary pmsiM, including copedy
 idcuffyug ufibtiesi the field by
 means of,u na,not Was, and City of Fayet evil e -
 r nn.a
 2.  Aeoauele xi
Clerks Off ooamnudng wlthaepreuauonce commodeoon% p

 as et, bnm ,. ones wberoa. Ord 6640 mmnd,<
e.,
  a¢
 memed ght- n s, daywry b ofndiu-k
 Ibe back of curs, inserted
 Was in in day aces wlux of back of
 4. Thowlcm' mu„
the Regular Edition on: ngb`°`
 way°ae5no1Cun andyeaiat dedkuea February 12, 2023
 eaumem. tan' Gandgb. cki ndewal4 nppn orne"'
J pmem' et a— In"ofwey in a pled a where
 sdewalkdoes do,c—
 un,awt. 5. Signal poles
 and appimcnumea Publication Charges: $ 214.
 I""°
 ngb' ar- wdy.°,. d°. an^e^' bedWlm osnclicase whecepolon" apryaenarcn
32 mas, re,n.. art lowrcd.
 6.
 Pram, acumen
 once, be dediurtd In areas

 areasnng d,vn.ge recdina . I.Ad cannot— —
 a— I.
 be deselepe es, abbfimg
 mreadbil, ry fo,
 up.
 i,s Pa 1a Lop
 o Na due to
z w-typical fea^ wd% aa laa.
 me wnbm. et. rce nghn oarawy.> n Subscribed and swgm

to before me This j 3 M


day of 9-2023.
 , urn Pub is "
 PN's MAW M
 l o,iE io3T fn - /
 f/('
 MY °
  Public
 man` sTlanMy ExV YWW —1Y Nota—ry
Commission Expires:
NOTE""MIIP`
 71111

 1GG Please do not
 11,
 pay from Affidavit. Invoice will be
 sent.
Board of Trustees Meeting
September 14-15, 2023
Page 39


 the campuses, divisions and units involved in this effort to coordinate workforce
 development and education policy.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Committee requests further reporting
 on these efforts at its next meeting on November 15, 2023.

7. Report on Agriculture Committee Meeting Held September 15, 2023:

 Trustee Cox reported that Dr. Charles Robinson and Dr. Deacue Fields gave a joint report from
 the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, and the Division of Agriculture concerning the
 completion and execution of a Memorandum of Agreement between the two organizations.
 Upon motion of Trustee Cox and second by Trustee Fryar, the report was accepted.

8. Report on Buildings and Grounds Committee Meetings Held September 15, 2023:

 Chairman Dickey reported that the Buildings and Grounds Committee met on September 15,
 2023. Chairman Dickey moved that the actions of the Committee be approved by the Board;
 Trustee Eichler seconded, and the following resolutions were adopted:

 8.1 Approval of a Memorandum of Agreement with the City of Fayetteville, UAF:

 WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville and the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville,
 propose to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) addressing conditions for
 vacation of various rights of way, conveyance of certain rights of way to the City, and
 addressing ongoing maintenance responsibilities of the University and the City for certain
 roadways and related properties through and adjacent to campus and associated rights of
 way, as well as addressing utility easements; and

 WHEREAS, in order to implement the terms of the MOA the Board and the City must
 each convey and receive specific parcels of real property held by the other, and certain
 easements must be granted;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS THAT the terms and conditions of the MOA are
 approved and the Board approves right of way dedication through conveyance to the City
 of Fayetteville of the following property situated in Fayetteville, Washington County,
 Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:

 Part of the NE1/4 NE1/4 and part of the SE1/4 NE1/4, and part of the
 SW1/4 NE1/4 and part of the NE1/4 SE1/4 of Section 17, Township 16
 North, Range 30 West, City of Fayetteville, Washington County,
 Arkansas, being more particularly described as follows:
Board of Trustees Meeting
September 14-15, 2023
Page 40


 Commencing at the NW corner of the said NE1/4 NE1/4; Thence S
 02°43'18" W along the West line of said NE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of
 309.18 feet; Thence S 87°16'42" E, a distance of 23.76 feet to a point lying
 on the Easterly right of way line of Razorback Road and the Easterly back
 of curb line of said Razorback Road and the Point of Beginning; Thence
 along the Easterly back of curb line of said Razorback Road the following
 bearings and distances: S 02°58'57" W, a distance of 487.50 feet; S
 02°40'22" W, a distance of 608.01 feet; S 02°54'03" W, a distance of
 436.29 feet; S 03°01'17" W, a distance of 198.13 feet; S 01°25'06" W, a
 distance of 214.48 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a distance of 95.61; Thence
 Southeasterly along the Northerly back of curb line of Meadow Street
 along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of 89°30'25",
 for a distance of 46.87 feet, said curve having a chord bearing of S
 42°02'08" E, and distance of 42.24 feet; Thence S 01°46'07" W, a distance
 of 31.18 feet to the Southerly back of curb line of said Meadow Street and
 the beginning of a circular curb to the left; Thence along the Easterly back
 of curb line of said Razorback Road the following bearings and distances:
 Southwesterly along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central
 angle of 90°29'35", for a distance of 47.38 feet, said curve having a chord
 bearing of S 47°57'52" W, and distance of 42.61 feet; S 02°43'04" W, a
 distance of 88.40 feet; S 03°03'35" W, a distance of 200.01 feet; S
 02°54'25" W, a distance of 322.05 feet; Thence N 88°04'02" W, a distance
 of 17.94 feet; Thence N 02°32'00" E, a distance of 401.68 feet to the SW
 corner of the aforesaid SE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N 02°35'17" E along the
 West line of the said SE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 124.57 feet; Thence N
 86°38'48" W, a distance of 37.23 feet to the Westerly back of curb line of
 said Razorback Road; Thence N 02°43'04" E along the Westerly back of
 curb line of said Razorback Road, a distance of 85.06 feet; Thence
 Northwesterly along the Westerly back of curb line of said Razorback
 Road along a 30.00 feet radius curve to the left, thru a central angle of
 26°45'00", for a distance of 14.01 feet, said curve having a chord bearing
 of N 10°39'26" W, and distance of 13.88 feet; Thence N 02°32'00" E, a
 distance of 34.66 feet; Thence S 86°40'45" E, a distance of 40.25 feet to
 the West line of the said SE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N 02°35'17" E along the
 West line of the said SE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 1056.85 feet to the SW
 corner of the NE1/4 NE1/4; Thence N 02°43'18" E along the West line of
 the said NE1/4 NE1/4, a distance of 769.53 feet; Thence S 87°08'22" E, a
 distance of 5.84 feet; Thence N 02°46'31" E, a distance of 243.50 feet to a
 point lying on the Easterly right of way line of said Razorback Road;
 Thence N 57°28'29" E along the Easterly right of way line of said
 Razorback Road, a distance of 21.67 feet to the Point of Beginning,
 containing 1.43 Acres more or less.
Board of Trustees Meeting
September 14-15, 2023
Page 41



 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Board accepts all property to be conveyed or
 vacated to it by the City of Fayetteville in accordance with the MOA.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the Chairman and the Secretary or Assistant
 Secretary shall be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and deliver any and all deeds or
 other instruments of conveyance necessary to close the transaction.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the President or his designee shall be, and hereby
 is, authorized to execute and deliver any and all utility, drainage, and other easements
 reasonably necessary to implement the terms of the MOA.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the President, the Chancellor and Chief Financial
 Officer of the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville or their respective designees shall be,
 and hereby are, authorized to take such further action and execute such other documents
 and instruments as might be necessary to close the transactions contemplated by the
 MOU.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT all documents related to the transactions shall be
 in a form and content acceptable to the General Counsel.

 8.2 Approval of Sale of SEFOR Property, UAF:

 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
 ARKANSAS THAT the Board hereby approves the acceptance of the offer from
 Specter, LLC, for the purchase price of $1,150,000 and on the terms and conditions set
 forth in the Offer and Acceptance to sell the former SEFOR property located east of
 Strickler in Washington County, Arkansas, more particularly described as follows:

 A parcel of land situated in Sections 3 and 4, Township 13 North and Section
 33, Township 14 North, all being in Range 31 West of the 5th Principal
 Meridian and in Washington County, Arkansas, and being more particularly
 described as follows:
 Beginning at the Northeast Corner of the fractional Northwest quarter of
 Section 3, Township 13 North, thence South 1° 19' East 4810.1 feet to the
 Southeast Corner of the Southwest quarter, Section 3, thence North 89° 32'
 West 5291.0 feet to the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of Section
 4, thence North 1° 11' West 1320.0 feet to Northwest corner of the Southwest
 quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, thence South 89° 32' East 552.75
 feet thence North 1° 11' West 362.0 feet to the center of Strawberry Branch,
 thence with said branch across Fall Creek North 44° 41’ West 484.4 feet,
 thence North 1° 11’ West 608.7 feet to the North line of the Northwest quarter