Transportation Committee — Fayetteville, AR
Date: 2026-05-26
Time: 17:30

113 W Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701

 Transportation Committee Agenda
 (Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session)
 City Hall Room 101 / Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
 Tuesday, May 26, 2026
 5:30 PM


 Members
 Council Member Sarah Moore, Chair
 Council Member Robert "Bob" Stafford
 Council Member Sarah Bunch
 Council Member Min. Monique Jones

 City Staff
 Public Works Director Chris Brown
Assistant Public Works / Transportation Services Director Terry Gulley
 City Engineer Justin Bland
Transportation Committee May 26, 2026




Zoom Information

 Webinar ID: 850 2853 0693
 Registration Link: Zoom Link

A. Call to Order

B. Roll Call

C. New Business

 C.1. N. Gregg Ave. - Conceptual Design Review

 C.2. Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull

 Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull


 C.3. College Ave. - Conceptual Design Review

 College Ave. - Conceptual Design Review


D. Reports and Presentations

 D.1. Intersection Signal Timing Policies

 D.2. Presentation from Sunset Woods Property Owner's Association

E. Informational Items

F. Adjournment




City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 2

113 W Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701

 Transportation Committee Agenda
 (Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session)
 City Hall Room 101 / Virtual Meeting Via Zoom
 Tuesday, May 26, 2026
 5:30 PM


 Members
 Council Member Sarah Moore, Chair
 Council Member Robert "Bob" Stafford
 Council Member Sarah Bunch
 Council Member Min. Monique Jones

 City Staff
 Public Works Director Chris Brown
Assistant Public Works / Transportation Services Director Terry Gulley
 City Engineer Justin Bland
Transportation Committee May 26, 2026




Zoom Information

 Webinar ID: 850 2853 0693
 Registration Link: Zoom Link

A. Call to Order

B. Roll Call

C. New Business

 C.1. N. Gregg Ave. - Conceptual Design Review

 C.2. Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull

 Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull


 C.3. College Ave. - Conceptual Design Review

 College Ave. - Conceptual Design Review


D. Reports and Presentations

 D.1. Intersection Signal Timing Policies

 D.2. Presentation from Sunset Woods Property Owner's Association

E. Informational Items

F. Adjournment




City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 2
 W NORTH ST




 W PATRICIA LN



 N GREGG AVE




 W HOLLY ST




 W LAWSON ST




 ARK
 ANS
 AS &
 MIS
 SOU
 RI R
 AILR
 W SPRUCE ST OAD




 W MOAN PL



 NG
 REG
MA GA
  TCH
 LINE VE
 A V E
 WS A S Y
 N E
 T
 RE S
 WP
 MO EAR

MATCH LINE
 YCA WP
 ST

 AR
 OPL
 ST
 L R O AD
 ARKANSAS Y A V E R I R AI
 & MISSOURI NS HAD I SSO U
 RAILROAD A S & M
 R K AN S
 A
 INSTALL RRFB

 N GREG
 G AVE
 WE
 LM
 ST

 MIDTOWN TRAIL
 WM
 WA R ST
 ILLE
 SH S
NORTH GREGG AVENUE | CRASH MAP




 Arkansas Crash Analytics Tool (ACAT)
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Context
N Gregg Ave. is a four-lane road that runs in a north-south
direction. The four travel lanes measure approximately 11' wide.
There are designated left turn lanes at W Drake St., W Township
Ave., and W North St., and there is a designated right turn lane at
W North St. Three traffic-controlled intersections, W Sunbridge
Dr., W Poplar St., and W Sycamore St., do not have designated
turn lanes. City-owned right-of-way varies throughout the studied
corridor between 62' to 75'; however, when combined with the
railroad right-of-way, it can be up to 105' wide in some segments.
There is a mix of bicycle and pedestrian facilities along N Gregg
Ave.

Challenges
Although Gregg Ave. serves as a central north-south
connection for both vehicles and people on foot, there are
several conditions that make Gregg Ave. less navigable and
safe to travel on. &
 GREGG AVE.
Topography changes on Gregg Ave. between W Sycamore St.
and W North St. limit sight distance for drivers cresting the hill. 4 10,000 to 17,000
 travel lanes vehicles per day
Four wide travel lanes lead to drivers exceeding the speed
limit. Further, sections of the adjacent sidewalks provide little to
no buffer, have obstacles in the path, or are severely cracked
with uneven surfaces.




Topography changes on N Gregg Ave. Off-camber sidewalk with no buffer & wall




N Gregg Ave. near W Township Ave., where the Multiple mailboxes obstructing sidewalk Razorback Transit bus stop
sidewalk & grass buffer are wider




Debris & vegetation obstructing sidewalk Cracked & uneven surfaces in both the roadway & Transition from buffered sidewalk to unbuffered
 sidewalk sidewalk
NORTH GREGG AVENUE | ROAD
RECONFIGURATION
 4-LANE

BENEFITS OF A 3-LANE VS
4-LANE ROAD Outside lane
  Fewer crash risks: A dedicated center turn lane
 traffic hidden by
  reduces rear‑end and left‑turn crashes by inside lane vehicle
  getting turning vehicles out of the through lane.

  More predictable speeds: With just one
  through‑lane each way, traffic tends to move at
  steadier, safer speeds.

  Safer left turns: Drivers only have to cross one
  lane instead of two, which makes turning easier
  and lowers the chance of collisions

  Improved pedestrian and bike safety: Fewer
 3-LANE
  lanes mean shorter crossings, and the extra
  space can be used for bike lanes or pedestrian
  islands.

  Proven crash reduction: Studies show overall No hidden
  crash reductions ranging from about 19% to vehicles
  nearly 50%.




 BENEFITS OF RAISED MEDIAN

 Fewer Crash Risks: A raised median virtually
 eliminates head-on collisions and angle crashes
 for left-turns out of driveways.

 Simplified Maneuvers: Left turns out of
 driveways are simplified through a right turn
 followed by a U-turn. Drivers only need to focus
 on one direction at a time.

 Non-Motorist Protection: Raised medians
 provide a refuge for pedestrians/cyclists
 crossing the roadway.

 Signal Timing Flexibility: Raised medians allow
 more flexibility for pedestrian crosswalk timings
 at signals. A two-stage pedestrian crossing
 could reallocate green time for vehicles to
 reduce overall delay.
DESIGN CONCEPTS
N GREGG AVE. & W SYCAMORE ST.
 CONCEPT
BEFORE




AFTER
DESIGN CONCEPTS
N GREGG AVE. & W ASH ST. CONCEPT

BEFORE




AFTER
KEY AMENITIES IN NEW DESIGN




 RRFB CROSSING RAISED CROSSING
 (RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON)
 Increases pedestrian safety and comfort by incentivizing
 Increases pedestrian safety and comfort by making
 slower vehicle speeds
 crossing conditions more visible to drivers




 CENTER TURN LANE CENTER MEDIAN WITH TREES
 For vehicles to safely make left turns into driveways, Enhances road safety by preventing head-on collisions and
 businesses, or side streets without blocking through traffic reducing traffic speeds




 ON-STREET PARKING BULB OUTS
 Increases access to houses and businesses, slows Increases pedestrian safety and comfort by reducing
 traffic, and provides a buffer for people on sidewalks crossing widths
NORTH GREGG AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW
 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST




 1.7 million

 FHWA
 SAFE STREETS 4
 ALL FEDERALLY
 FUNDED
 Local Match
 25% Funds
 (2019 Bond)
ABOUT THE PROJECT
 Federal
In December 2023, the U.S. Department of Transportation 75% SS4A
 Grant
awarded Fayetteville a $25 million Safe Streets and Roads
for All (SS4A) grant to accelerate safety and infrastructure
improvements identified in the Vision Zero Strategy, which
aims to eliminate severe crashes and enhance
transportation safety for all users.
 EFFICIENCY
N. Gregg Avenue is a central north-south corridor that is
identified on the High Injury Network (HIN) analyses. Gregg
Ave. serves as a Razorback Transit route and has access to CONNECTIVITY
Interstate 49, with an average of 10,000 to 17,000 vehicles
using the route every day. Due to its wide multi-lane design
and lacking sidewalks, Gregg Ave. can be a difficult
environment for people walking, biking and rolling.

These projects are funded by a 75% federal SS4A grant
with 25% matching funds from the 2019 Bond Program and
are under review by the Federal Highway Administration. SAFETY


 We want to hear
 IDENTIFIED AS A HIGH-INJURY
 from you! NETWORK
 222 CRASHES
 VEHICULAR

 from 2019 - 2023




 009
 (Bicycle rider,
 NON-MOTORIST pedestrian, etc.)
 CRASHES
 from 2019 - 2023




 SCAN HERE
 007
 SERIOUS INJURIES
 OR FATALITIES
 from 2019 - 2023
FAYETTEVILLE EXAMPLES

W TOWNSHIP ST.
 # of travel lanes: 2

 center turn lane: YES
 vehicles per day: 11,000 to
 15,000



 NELSON HACKETT BLVD.
 # of travel lanes: 2

 center turn lane: YES

 vehicles per day: 17,000




W DEANE ST.

 # of travel lanes: 2

 center turn lane: YES
 vehicles per day: 7,800




 MISSION BLVD.

 # of travel lanes: 2

 center turn lane: NO

 vehicles per day: 14,000
 RAZORBACK GREENWA
 Y


 RAZOR
 BACK
 GR
 EE NW
 AY




 SCOOTER PARKING


 N CHESTNUT AVE




 N DAWN DR


 W SYCAMORE ST




ARK
 AN
 SAS
 &M
 ISSO
 URI
 RAI
 NG LRO
 REG AD
 G AV
 E
 Transportation Committee Memo
 2026-1933

Meeting of May 26, 2026
To: Transportation Committee
Thru: Chris Brown, Public Works Director
From: Justin Bland, City Engineer
Subject: Gregg St. SS4A –Amendment #1 with Crafton Tull

Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of contract Amendment #1 to the master agreement with Crafton Tull in the
amount of $189,380.00 for additional design services on the Gregg St. project.
Background:
The city received a $25,000,000 Safe Streets for All grant for five construction projects including this section of
Gregg St. (between North St. and Drake St.). Crafton Tull has a contract in place to provide a conceptual
design which they are nearing completion on. This conceptual design phase included a public meeting which
was held on April 29, 2026. Staff will present the recommended design concept along with public
feedback/survey results at the Transportation Committee on May 26, 2026.
Discussion:
The scope of services for this next phase of design include the Preliminary Design Phase which includes
another round of public engagement, preparation of land acquisition documents, agency coordination for
environmental review and preliminary plan preparation amongst other items. The amendment also includes
similar tasks for completion of the final plan preparation and bidding services.
Budget/Staff Impact:
The City has been awarded federal funding for this project through the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
Program, as approved by Resolution 301-24 and the original design contract with Crafton Tull was approved
by Resolution 190-25. The $189,380 cost in this proposal is for preliminary and final design services. Matching
funds for the SS4A grant funds will come from the 2019 Bond Program.



 Description Account Project Amount
 SS4A 2235.900.9225-5860.02 32401.9225 $144,334.29
 Transportation Bond 4702.860.7235-5860.02 46020.7235.9225 $45,045.71
 Program



Attachments: Gregg Ave Improvements - Amendment 1




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO OWNER-ENGINEER AGREEMENT

 Subject of Amendment: Modification of Services



1. Background Data:

 a. Effective Date of OWNER-ENGINEER Agreement: 8/19/2025

 b. OWNER: City of Fayetteville, Arkansas

 c. ENGINEER: Crafton, Tull & Associates, Inc.

 d. Project: Gregg Avenue Improvements (North Street to Township Street

2. Nature of Amendment

The scope of services is being modified to include construction observation & construction administration services.

3. Description of Modifications

 See Attachment 1, “Modifications”

OWNER and ENGINEER hereby agree to modify the above-referenced Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. All
provisions of the Agreement not modified by this or previous Amendments remain in effect. The Effective Date of this
Amendment is .

OWNER: ENGINEER:

CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS CRAFTON, TULL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



By: By:
 Molly Rawn Lucas Jost, P.E.

Title: Mayor Title: Vice President

Date Signed: Date Signed: 05/06/2026




EJCDC No. E-501
1999 Edition
 Page 1 of 2
 ATTACHMENT 1

 MODIFICATIONS


  Additional Services to be performed by ENGINEER:

 See Exhibit “A”

  Modifications to Payment to ENGINEER:

 o The Contract amount is to be increased by a total of $135,000.

  Summary of Contract Payments:
 Original Contract: $227,860.00
 Change Order #1: $189,380.00
 Revised Total: $417,240.00




EJCDC No. E-501
1999 Edition
 Page 2 of 2
 Exhibit “A”
 Civil Scope of Basic Services for:

 Project: Gregg Avenue Improvements
 Client: City of Fayetteville
 Location of Project: Gregg Avenue, Fayetteville, AR
 Discipline: Civil Engineering
 Discipline Manager: Luke Jost, P.E.
 Project Manager: Luke Jost, P.E.
 Proposal Date: May 5, 2026
 Billing Type: Hourly with a Maximum/Reimbursable Expenses
 Fee/Estimate: Civil Design $166,880
 Additional Survey $5,000
 Landscape Plans (PRISM) $7,500
 QA/QC (Laneshift) $10,000
 TOTAL: $189,380
 Description of the Construction Design of approximately 1.8 miles Gregg Ave from North Street to Drake
 Project: Street. Design to include road diet street improvements and intersection
 improvements within that corridor (see anticipated alignment Exhibit C).

Project scope:
Design of approximately 9,700 linear feet (1.8 miles) of Gregg Ave from North Street to Township Street and a
crossing at Drake Street. The design is to include improvements to the existing corridor to better align the
roadway section with the Neighborhood Link typical section per the City’s Master Street Plan. Improvements are
expected to be concentrated on the east side of the corridor (largely holding the west curb line) and adding a
wider sidewalk where feasible to the east side of the road. Turn lanes or parking lanes will be added as
necessary. Special consideration will be given to the intersections with Sycamore Street and Poplar Street that
are listed on the City’s High Injury Network (HIN).

The following design aspects will also be included:
 - A traffic model will be developed to assess how proposed improvements affect level of service along the
 corridor.
 - Lighting improvements along the corridor.
 - Landscape improvements along the corridor (street trees).
 - Bus stops in accordance with latest ORT and Razorback Transit route plans.

The improvements are anticipated to be split into two separate bid packages after the 90% design phase.

Detailed services to be provided by the Engineer:

60% Design Phase:
 Finalize road geometrics based on 30% review comments
 Design of drainage structures as required
 Utility coordination
 Drawing Set to include:
 o Cover sheet
 o Plan & profile sheets
 o Signing & Striping plans
 o Grading & erosion control plans
 o Intersection improvement plans
 o Typical Section
 o Cross sections
 o Standard Details
 Update construction cost estimate
 Submit plans to owner for review
 Review plans with City and stakeholders

90% Design Phase:
 Revise plans based on comments to the 60% design submittal
 Pre-final design of corridor improvements
 Prepare the following construction drawings:
 o Cover Sheet
 o Plan & profile sheets
 o Typical section sheets
 o Cross sections
 o Grading & erosion control plans
 o Intersection improvement plans
 o Signing & striping plans
 o Landscape Plans
 o Notes and Standard & Special Details
 Updated construction cost estimate
 Submit plans to owner for review

Final Design Phase
 Finalize plans based on comments to the 90% design submittal
 Split project into two separate bid packages as agreed to with City staff
 Prepare storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)
 Submit final plans to City for review and approval
 Submit permit applications to ADEQ and USACE (if required)
 Update construction cost estimate
 Prepare project specifications/bid documents

Bidding and Contract Negotiation Phase
 Answer bidder’s questions and issue addenda
 Recommend Contractor to Owner
 Bid documents prepared and issued to bidders
 Receive bids and tabulate results

Items Provided by City:
 Site access
 Construction materials testing
 Acquisition of Right of Way and Easements

END SCOPE OF SERVICES THIS CONTRACT This is the scope of services for the Project. Should there
be additions to this scope of services, those services shall be compensated for additional fee.

Additional Items that can be provided by CTA under amendment or separate contract:
 Additional public input meetings
 Tree Preservation Plans/Calculations
 Construction Administration/Construction Observation
 ROW/Easement Acquisition Services
 Railroad Crossing design
 Retaining wall design (not anticipated)
 Structural/Bridge Designs
 FEMA applications/Coordination including CLOMR/LOMR process
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 2
 Exhibit "B"
 Standard Hourly Rate Schedule
 Effective January 1, 2026

 Hourly Hourly
 Category Rate Category Rate
ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
ENGINEERING PRINCIPAL ……....………..…………………….. $ 270 VICE PRESIDENT OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ….......... $ 220
SR. ENGINEERING MANAGER ……………...……………...…… $ 240 SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGER $ 195
 …............................................
ENGINEERING MANAGER ………………….……………....…….. $ 210 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGER $ 180
 ….............................................................
SR. PROJECT ENGINEER …………………….…………...……. $ 180 SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ………………..………………….. $ 170
PROJECT ENGINEER …………………………..…………..……. $ 160 PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ………....……………….. $ 155
ENGINEER INTERN III ………………………..………….……….. $ 145 LANDSCAPE DESIGNER III …………………...………................. $ 125
ENGINEER INTERN II …………………………..………..……….. $ 135 LANDSCAPE DESIGNER II …………………………................... $ 115
ENGINEER INTERN I …………………………..………….………. $ 125 LANDSCAPE DESIGNER I …………………………...................... $ 100
SR. ENGINEERING DESIGNER ……………..…………..……….. $ 165 LANDSCAPE DESIGN INTERN …………………………....................$ 80
ENGINEERING DESIGNER III ………………..…………..………. $ 130 $
 LANDSCAPE CAD TECHNICIAN II ………………………….................... 85
ENGINEERING DESIGNER II ………………..…………..……….. $ 110 $
 LANDSCAPE CAD TECHNICIAN I ………………………….................... 75
ENGINEERING DESIGNER I …………………..………..………… $ 100 SURVEYING
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN III ……..…………………….. $ 95 SURVEYING PRINCIPAL …………………………………............. $ 250
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN II ……….………..………….. $ 85 SR. SURVEYING MANAGER ………………………………..………$ 215
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN I ………..……….…………… $ 75 SURVEYING MANAGER ……………………………..................... $ 190
ENVIRONMENTAL SR. PROJECT SURVEYOR …………………………………......... $ 165
SR. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER …………….……..…………. $ 220 PROJECT SURVEYOR ………………………………………......... $ 145
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER …………………..……........……. $ 185 SURVEYOR INTERN II ………………………………………..……. $ 125
SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST ……………..…...…………. $ 155 SURVEYOR INTERN I …………………………………………..…. $ 110
PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST ……..……........…… $ 125 SURVEY COORDINATOR …………………………………….…… $ 120
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II ………………..……...………. $ 100 CREW CHIEF II ……………………………………………….......... $ 110
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I ………………..………....……. $ 80 CREW CHIEF I …………………………………………………....... $ 95
ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD TECHNICIAN …..……………………. $ 65 FIELD SURVEYOR III …………………………………………........ $ 85
INSPECTION FIELD SURVEYOR II …………………………………………...…... $ 75
INSPECTION MANAGER …........................................................ $ 140 FIELD SURVEYOR I ……………………………………………...... $ 65
SR. INSPECTOR ………………………………...…..…………….. $ 120 SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN III ………………………………..….. $ 110
INSPECTOR II ………………………………...….…………………. $ 100 SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN II ………………………………...….. $ 90
INSPECTOR I …………………………………....…………………. $ 80 SURVEY CAD TECHNICIAN I ………………………………...…….$ 80
UAV SERVICES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
UAV TEAM LEAD ………………………………...……………........ $ 125 SR. GIS MANAGER ……………………………………………….. $ 180
UAV PILOT ………………………………………...……………….... $ 85 GIS MANAGER ………………………………………….....……….. $ 145
ADMINISTRATIVE GIS ANALYST …………………...………………………....……….. $ 110
ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPAL ………………...…………………. $ 240 GIS TECHNICIAN II ……………………………………..…………… $ 85
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER ………………...………………….. $ 180 GIS TECHNICIAN I …………………………………….……………. $ 65
ADMINISTRATIVE IV ………………………....…………………….. $ 120 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
ADMINISTRATIVE III …………………………...………………….. $ 95 GPS Equipment………...….....….……............…..….....…....$35/Hour
ADMINISTRATIVE II ……………………...……...………………….. $ 70 Robotic Survey Equipment…….……….........…….............…$20/Hour
ADMINISTRATIVE I ……………………………...…………………. $ 55 Bathymetric Survey Equipment …………..….................…...$35/Hour
PLANNING LiDAR Scanning Equipment …………..…..................….…..$35/Hour
PLANNING PRINCIPAL …........................................................... $ 250 UAV ……………………………….............……….…..…...…$1000/Unit
SR. PLANNING MANAGER …………………………………...….. $ 220 Job Related Mileage………...........................................…...$0.72/Mile
PLANNING MANAGER ………………………………………......... $ 210 Per Diem for Out of Town Crews…...…................Per GSA Allowable
SR. PLANNER …………………………………………………...….. $ 170 Airfare and other travel related expenses……….................….At Cost
PROJECT PLANNER …………………………………………........ $ 130 Black and white 8.5"x11" Copies ….……......................... $0.15/sheet
PLANNER III …………………………………………………….….... $ 120 Color 8.5"x11" Copies …….……....……..................….…. $1.50/sheet
PLANNER II ……………………………………………………..…..... $ 110 Photo Paper Color Plan Sheet Copies ……..................... $0.75/sq. ft.
PLANNER I ………...…………………………………………...…….. $ 100 Reproducible Plan Copies (Vellum) …...…....................... $1.50/sq. ft
 Reproducible Plan Copies (Bond) ……........................…. $0.35/sq. ft.
 All rates are subject to change without notice.
 Exhibit “C”
 Anticipated Design Schedule


 Notice to Proceed: August 2025
 30% Plans: May 2026
 o City Review (2 weeks)
 o Utility Coordination (2 weeks)
 60% Plans: July – August 2026 (9 weeks)
 o City Review: 2 weeks
 o Utility Coordination (2 weeks)
 o FHWA Coordination (TBD)
 90% Plans & Draft Contract docs: October – November 2026 (8 weeks)
 o City Review: 2 weeks
 o FHWA Coordination (TBD)
 o Utility Relocation (12 weeks)
 Final Plans & Specifications: January 2027 (6 weeks)
 Bidding & Construction: 2027 – TBD by City of Fayetteville
 Appendix "D"
 MANHOUR ESTIMATE
 Gregg Avenue Improvements
 FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS



Proposal ADMN LA SR. ENGR PROJ PROJ PRINC
Item ASST INTERN LA DSNR ENGR MGR ENGR Estimated
 No. Description $80 $85  $145 $110 $160 $240 $260  Cost

 Other Disciplines
 Landscape (PRISM) $7,500
 Survey (CTA) $5,000
 Laneshift $10,000


2.0 60% Plans
2.1 Update Per City Comment 40 40 8 $12,720
2.2 Drainage Design 24 40 24 $14,800
2.3 Grading Design 24 40 24 $14,800
2.3 Grading & Erosion Control Plan 40 20 8 $9,520
2.4 Intersection Plans 40 40 24 $16,560
2.5 Signing & Striping Plans 16 8 8 $4,960
2.6 Details 4 $440
2.7 Estimate 4 8 2 $2,200
2.8 QC Review 16 4 8 $4,320
 Subtotal $80,320

3.0 90% Plans
3.1 Update Per City Comment 40 16 12 $9,840
3.2 Finalize Drainage Design 24 8 $5,760
3.3 Finalize Traffic Design 40 40 16 $14,640
3.4 Lighting Plans 40 16 8 $8,880
3.5 City Permits 16 8 $4,480
3.6 Utility Coordination 24 16 $7,680
3.7 Bid Docs/Specs for Review 16 8 $4,480
3.8 QC Review 4 8 4 $3,400
 Subtotal $55,760

4.0 Final Plans
4.1 Finalize Plans per City Comment 24 16 16 $9,040
4.2 Finalize Bid Documents/Specs 20 8 $5,120
4.3 QC Review 16 16 8 4 $7,280
 Subtotal $14,160

5.0 Bidding
5.1 Prebid Meeting/Prep 8 12 $4,160
5.2 Questions/Addenda 16 16 24 $10,080
5.3 Review Bids & Recommend Contractor 2 8 4 $2,400
 Subtotal $16,640
 Total 4 88 72 500 570 346 4 $189,380




 Page 1 of 1
 Transportation Committee Memo
 2026-1936

Meeting of May 26, 2026
To: Transportation Committee
Thru: Chris Brown, Public Works Director
From: Justin Bland, City Engineer
Subject: College Ave. - Conceptual Design Review

Recommendation:
Engineering Staff recommends full implementation of the proposed streetscape section for College Ave. This
includes a new traffic signal at the Poplar intersection, medians, street trees, new buffered sidewalks, and
other improvements.
Background:
The proposed improvements to this corridor result from several years of public feedback and master planning.
This includes the 71B Corridor Study, completed in 2019, and the adoption of City Plan 2040, both of which
included substantial public input. These efforts led ArDOT to officially remove the majority of the 71B Corridor
from the state highway system in 2020. In 2024, the 71B Corridor was rezoned to the new Urban Corridor
zoning district. In addition, a $25 million Safe Streets for All (SS4A) grant was awarded for five projects,
including the College Ave. corridor between Sycamore and Township. This grant includes funding for the
design and construction of safety improvements for each corridor. The city selected Garver as the civil
engineering consultant for the work.
Discussion:
After performing a corridor survey, traffic study, and safety review, the consultant prepared a proposed
streetscape section and scroll plot of the corridor for review. This design addresses many current safety
concerns, including poor sidewalks, a lack of crosswalks, and excessive driveway density. The proposed
design will greatly enhance pedestrian safety by providing proper buffered sidewalks and new Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) protected crosswalks. It will also enhance vehicular safety by reducing the
number of lanes drivers must cross during turning movements. A new traffic signal will be at added at the
Poplar Intersection as well.
Budget/Staff Impact:
None at this time.
Attachments: 2026-05-01 College Avenue Phase 2 - Public Meeting Roll Plot - Reduced




Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

 EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

 PL PL PL EXISTING PROPERTY LINE


 PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT ROLL PLOT EXHIBIT
 PROPOSED MEDIAN/GREENSPACE NORTH COLLEGE AVENUE
 PROPOSED COLORED CONCRETE (E. SYCAMORE STREET TO E. TOWNSHIP STREET)
 FAYETTEVILLE, AR
0 30' 60' 120' 180'
 PROPOSED CONCRETE
 (IN FEET)



 E PO
 THE GROVE

 PLAR
 CHURCH



 ET
 STRE
 NEW LIFE WALGREENS
 CHURCH
 FOGHORN'S ARVEST
 BANK

 H&B

 E SUN
 D
 ROA AUTO
 POTENTIAL PLACEMAKING
 FEATURE LOCATION
 R ES GRAND CRAZY LVD.
 A C SAVINGS KHANA VIL L A B
 N TACO N
 GREE BANK INDIAN BURGER
 CHEBA HUT GRILL
 E
 PROPOSED TREES (TYP.) KING


 BRIDG
 PROPOSED STREET LIGHT (TYP.)
 DAISY
 EXCHANGE MARKET BANG
 AUTO SALON
 PROPOSED BUS STOP




 DRIVE
 ONLY ONLY
 COLLEGE AVENUE


 E TOW




 OVERCREST STREET
 E SY
 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHT (TYP.)


 BOCCA NSHIP
 O
 KOSMOS
 PROPOSED BUS STOP PROPOSED BUS STOP


 CAM
 THE WITH SHELTER WITH SHELTER ITALIAN
 PROPOSED BUS STOP GREEKAFE
 BUTTERED EATERY
 STRE
 WITH SHELTER
 BISCUIT PROPOSED BUS STOP MAVERIK

 T
 TREE
 CVS
 ET


 RE S
 CHIEF
 OZARK
 MOTEL
 BOWLING
 POTENTIAL PLACEMAKING
 FEATURE LOCATION




 POTENTIAL FUTURE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
 COLLEGE AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION COLLEGE AVENUE TYPICAL SECTION
 WITH LANDSCAPED MEDIAN WITH CENTER TURN LANE
Sunset Woods Neighborhood
 ❖ Established February 12th, 1979




 Sunset
 Woods
The Sunset Woods Property Owners’ Association


 ❖ 53 individual lots
 42 are developed, average build date 1989
 9 still undeveloped in natural state

 ❖ Over 6.6 acres of Open Space

 ❖ Plat includes portions of 5 streets
 ❖ West Berry Street
 ❖ North Lewis Avenue
 ❖ Valley View Drive
 ❖ North Oak Drive
 ❖ West Sunset Place
The Sunset Woods Property Owners’ Association

❖ Highlighted are the 5 streets within POA Plat
 West Berry Street  (portion)
 North Lewis Avenue (portion)
 Valley View Drive  (portion)
 North Oak Drive (portion)
 West Sunset Place

 All streets are signposted No Parking

 Streets were last improved in the early 2000’s




 Sunset Woods
Five existing private streets within Sunset Woods
 1. West Berry Street (portion)
 2. North Lewis Avenue (portion)
 3. Valley View Drive (portion)
 4. North Oak Drive (portion)
 5. West Sunset Place




 1. West Berry Street (portion)




 2. North Lewis Avenue (portion)
Five existing private streets within Sunset Woods
 1. West Berry Street (portion)
 2. North Lewis Avenue (portion)
 3. Valley View Drive (portion)
 4. North Oak Drive (portion)
 5. West Sunset Place




3. Valley View Drive (portion)




4. North Oak Drive (portion)
Five existing private streets within Sunset Woods
 1. West Berry Street (portion)
 2. North Lewis Avenue (portion)
 3. Valley View Drive (portion)
 4. North Oak Drive (portion)
 5. West Sunset Place




5. West Sunset Place




5. West Sunset Place
Sunset Woods Neighborhood

Majority of neighborhood is Hilltop/Hillside overlay and adjacent
to Enduring Green Network




Over 6.6 acres of permanent wooded open space with mature trees
The Sunset Woods Property Owners’ Association
 Parcel # 2025 Tax Address
 1989 765-11298-000 $2,871.96 1850 W Berry
 1994 765-11299-000 $3,126.57 1846 W Berry
 1990 765-11300-000 $2,034.02 1818 W Berry
 1993 765-11301-000 $4,011.28 1796 W Berry
 ❖ In 2025 the Sunset Woods 1984 765-11302-000 $4,184.41 1794 W Berry
 765-11303-000 $3,881.26 871 Lewis
 property owners paid over 1985 765-11304-000 $4,025.55 893 Lewis
 765-11305-000 $3,407.16
 $175,000 in City taxes 1992 765-11306-000 $3,522.21
 931 Lewis
 957 Lewis
 1990 765-11307-000 $3,547.45 983/985 Lewis
 1985 765-11308-000 $4,709.15 980/982 Lewis
 1985 765-11309-000 $5,589.52 968/970 Lewis
 765-11310-000 $4,579.25 956/958 Lewis
 ❖ With average house built in 1985 765-11311-000 $1,390.62 934 Lewis

 1989, this means over 35 1985
 1985
 765-11312-000
 765-11313-000
 $2,760.79
 $3,963.31
 936 Lewis
 894 Lewis
 years of City taxes have 1981 765-11314-000 $4,239.22 882 Lewis
 765-11315-000 $3,398.66 872 Lewis
 been paid on developed 1993 765-11316-000 $2,139.66 865 Lewis

 property 1993
 765-11317-000
 765-11318-000
 $1,498.88
 $1,701.00
 1793 W Berry
 1795 W Berry
 1990 765-11319-000 $2,801.44 1823 W Berry
 1984 765-11320-000 $4,317.33 1835 W Berry
 2005 765-11321-000 $4,609.80 1081 Valley View
 ❖ Annual dues have been 1992 765-11322-000
 765-11323-000
 $3,030.07 1063 Valley View
 $222.69 1033 Valley View
 increased several times 1988 765-11324-000 $1,019.13 1015 Valley View
 1988 765-11326-000 $1,745.10 1040 Valley View
 over the years to pay for 1988 765-11327-000 $6,194.21 1062 Valley View
 infrastructure 1992 765-11328-000
 765-11329-000
 $4,145.58 1072 Valley View
 $1,398.95 1084 Valley View
 maintenance. 2018 765-11330-000 $4,648.69 1015 Oak
 765-11331-000 $2,860.08 1001/1003 Oak
 1994 765-11332-000 $3,335.04 949/951 Oak
 765-11333-000 $3,159.23 931/933 Oak
 765-11334-000 $222.69 924 Oak
 765-11335-000 $593.84 930 Oak
 765-11336-000 $296.92 942 Oak
 1992 765-11337-000 $2,020.32 964 Oak
 1983 765-11338-000 $2,873.44 980/982 Oak
 1993 765-11339-000 $3,447.53 1008 Oak
 765-11340-000 $222.69 1020 Oak
 765-11341-000 $8,047.10 1476/1478 Sunset
 765-11342-000 $3,096.94 1492 Sunset
 1986 765-11343-000 $9,786.94 1506 Sunset
 2005 765-11344-000 1552 Sunset
 1976 765-11345-000 $4,032.87 1555 Sunset
 765-11346-000 $868.49 1517 Sunset
 1979 765-11347-001 $6,650.56 1485 Sunset
 765-11347-000 $1,489.17
 1995 765-11349-000 $4,065.24 911 Sunset
 765-11351-000 $2,747.20 935 Sunset
 765-11350-000 $2,752.22 1450 Sunset
 1959 765-11352-000 $8,719.80 1001 Sunset

 AVG 1989 $176,003.23
The Sunset Woods Property Owners’ Association (POA)

 Street R.O.W. Dedication Request

 ❖ Multiple meetings have occurred between the POA &
 Public Works Department to discuss the possible
 dedication of the five private streets to the City of
 Fayetteville.

 ❖ Poll of POA property owners indicated widespread
 support to apply for the dedication of the private
 streets to the City of Fayetteville. (POA Bylaws require
 signatures of a minimum of 75% of property owners to
 support the dedication.)

 ❖ Based on current RSF-4 zoning all existing lots in
 Sunset Woods are non-compliant due to lack of
 frontage along public streets.

 ❖ Sunbridge Villas established a precedence for a
 similar dedication of private streets to the City.

 ❖ The Sunset Woods POA requests that the
 Transportation Committee support and forward a
 positive recommendation to the City Council to
 accept the dedication of Sunset Woods streets to the
 City of Fayetteville.