Waterfront Working Group — Portland, ME
Date: 2019-04-25
Time: 15:00

Waterfront Working Group
 10 th Meeting Agenda
 April 25, 2019
 Room 209, City Hall (New Room)
 3:00pm to 5:00pm




 *************************************

1. Welcome and Introductions


2. Review Meeting Notes from Meeting 9


 4­11­2019 Meeting Notes attached
3. Continued Working Group discussion on Parking Issues


 Status review of Zoning Issues, Reflecting on Planning Board
4.
 Workshop


5. Status on Potential Portland Harbor dredge funding


 MDOT letter from Commissioner Van Note attached
6. Communication regarding Fisherman’s Wharf Project


7. Working Group discussion on Schedule moving forward

Waterfront Working Group
 10 th Meeting Agenda
 April 25, 2019
 Room 209, City Hall (New Room)
 3:00pm to 5:00pm




 *************************************

1. Welcome and Introductions


2. Review Meeting Notes from Meeting 9


 4­11­2019 Meeting Notes attached
3. Continued Working Group discussion on Parking Issues


 Status review of Zoning Issues, Reflecting on Planning Board
4.
 Workshop


5. Status on Potential Portland Harbor dredge funding


 MDOT letter from Commissioner Van Note attached
6. Communication regarding Fisherman’s Wharf Project


7. Working Group discussion on Schedule moving forward
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19
City of Portland
Waterfront Working Group

Meeting #9
Thursday, April 11, 2019
3:00 - 5:00 p.m.

Attendance:

PWWG: Mike Alfiero, Bill Coopersmith, Steve DiMillo, Cyrus Hagge, Keith Lane, Charlie
Poole, Willis Spear, Becky Rand, Dory Waxman (Togue Brawn absent)

Staff: Jon Jennings, Bill Needelman, Greg Mitchell, Matthew Grooms, Christine Grimaldo, John
Peverada (Parking Division Director)

Welcome and intros, review of minutes.

Meeting Summary:

Most of this meeting concerned parking issues and most specifically options for marine users
who do not have enough parking on the waterfront and piers for their workday and businesses
(including employees). It was acknowledged that there is not, and never will be, enough
waterfront/pier parking for marine use and that creative solutions will need to be implemented.
The solutions discussed included 3 categories: private off-street options; public off-street
options; and, public on-street options. Mr. Needelman stressed that these are 3 very separate and
different categories, each with its own set of options and difficulties.

John Peverada, City of Portland Parking Division Manager, attended this meeting to offer
expertise and advice.

Private, Off-Street Parking:

Mr. Needelman clarified that, as this category is subject to zoning, options can include the
creation of “water dependent parking” identified in zoning language. Although private parking
is not under city control (pier owners enforce), it is subject to zoning. Parking can be either an
accessory or stand alone use if it is a commercial lot. (Most lots are currently legal non-
conforming).

The defnintion of “legal non-conforming” was questioned and it was determined that it is
an issue that needs clarification in language.

Mr. Needelman clarified that language for “exclusivity” for water dependent use of pier edge
parking in WCZ performance standards means that restaurants/other uses will no longer have use
of parking during off-times as exclusivity would be maintained at all times.



 1
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19
So, do we keep it (exclusivity)? The general consensus is yes, particularly from the fishermen
contingent of group, but also supported by group as a whole. No one suggested eliminating
exclusivity.

If exclusivity is maintained, it will need better marking and signage and a mechanism to enforce
it needs to be implemented. Mr. Needelman stated that the best enforcement mechanism would
be through lease agreements. Many berthing tenants are at-will and/or month-to
month. Exclusivity is in zoning language now, but it hasn’t worked well; how to make it work?

John Jennings is committed to better code enforcement of private parking, including putting
markers in pavement, better signage and stricter enforcement from code officers. Other
improved enforcement mechanisms include documenting legal non-conforming parking,
termination of illegal spaces and a reporting method for illegal use. Charlie Poole prefers to
keep enforcement between owners and tenants.

The option of dedicated parking was discussed; it was “vetoed” (by consensus) as “no space can
be left empty, ever.”

Options to identify off-waterfront parking were discussed including car-pooling/ride sharing and
shuttles operated by businesses (example: WEX).

These options are included in the Summary of Parking Options Table distributed at this meeting
and available at the PWWG website.

Public, Off-Street Parking:

Angelo’s Acre is currently offering parking for $5.00 per day; it is primarily used by islanders,
mariners and low-wage earners. It has approx. 100 spaces now and is discussion is “on the
table” for a future structured parking garage there. There are 160 spaces at Fish Pier, where
there is currently no waiting list and mariners are given a half price discount. Structured parking
at Fish Pier is not desirable as it is waterside. Options near Ocean Gateway were discussed,
including a structured garage. The cost per space for building structured parking is about
$35,000 per space. There is also discussion of a “park and ferry” option -- this would be a
shared program with South Portland (park in South Portland, ferry to Portland).

Public, On-Street Parking:

The most conclusive option discussed involves issuing a specific number of hang-tags
(waterfront user permits) to boat captains and/or marine-use business owners, who may
distribute the tags as deemed appropriate and necessary to themselves or employees. The
number of hang-tags per captain/business owner was debated; the consensus reached was that 2
tags per year, per captain/business owner would be a good place to start, at least on a trial basis.
There are about 100 captains using the waterfront now.

The location(s) where the tags would be valid were discussed, with John Peverada (Parking
Division Manager) offering input and expertise on what might work best or not at all.

 2
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19

The likely spaces for this use are on Commercial Street; currently there about 100 unrestricted
spaces that could be converted to permit parking.

Mr. Peverada made clear that, in the category of public on-street parking, residents with
residential parking permits can park in 1 & 2 hour spaces all day without moving, which would
be in conflict with other permits, so he suggested converting some unregulated spaces to
waterfront permit only parking. Mr. Peverada does not think any permits should be allowed at
meters.

Zoning:

Matthew Grooms discussed the summary of proposed text amendments to zoning ordinances and
stated that they will present their recommendations to the Planning Board on April 23. There
will be a 1st hearing of these amendments in May.

Summary of proposed text amendments:

Permitted uses -- new category will be created
Uses in Commercial Street Overlay Zone -- name change from nmouz
Commercial kitchen will be added -- eliminate laundry/dry cleaning

NOTE: THERE WILL BE NO MEDICAL OFFICES PERMITTED, MATTHEW WILL
MAKE CERTAIN THIS IS ADDED TO THE ORDINANCE LANGUAGE.

Bill Needelman suggests the retention of ONE zone (instead of 2) to alleviate confusion and to
ensure that there were consistent performance standards.



Abbreviated Dialog -- Private, Off-Street Parking:

BN: Shared use has caused conflict, it’s a thorny issue.

WS: Look back a bit, in 2010 when we compromised with wharf owners so they could have 45
% on 1st floors; fishermen felt they needed something to protect -- so we pushed for access and
parking. We’re not adverse to sharing, but it’s not working the way it is. It’s worked on some
wharfs, but not on others. Could we have signage with hours, etc.?

MA: How does enforcement work? I think signage is a good idea.

JJ: It’s not just new development, we the City need to engage with pier owners now as opposed
to waiting for new construction. Pier owners are reasonable -- we, as the City need to engage on
that basis.



 3
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19
CP: In the 2010 conversation we said that we need to protect access and parking. I say it stays
exclusive and the more the City can do to keep it that way the better.

BN: It’s in the language now. I’m going to suggest that enforcement language be added.

DW: For owners who are here, what are your senses of what pier owners think?

SD: How are you going to get some owners to accept exclusivity? Signage will help, but
enforcement needs to be stricter.

BN: Tenant and landlord agreements will be the best place to negotiate terms.

SD: Regarding other pier owners, if there was a different arrangement -- say you pay more and
it’s dedicated parking.

KL: It’s too busy, you can’t leave a space open, ever.

DW: It really comes down to enforcement.

BN: It comes down to enforcement from the City and enforcement of landlord/tenant
agreements.

BC: All that parking is grandfathered -- or can we go back and fix that?

BN: We have to look back at history, go pier by pier.

SD: Maybe language needs to be about more than just pier edge.

BN: The pier edge is that specific resource that is critical, but parking in general is important --
with improved enforcement of existing codes.

Improved Enforcement of existing or amended WCZ parking restrictions -- see meeting handout
(parking table).

a. Document legal non-conforming parking on all piers
b. Terminate use of illegal non-conforming spaces by: voluntary pier owner action,zoning
enforcement action
c. Create mechanism for reporting illegal use

CP: I want to be able to say to my tenants, we’ll work this out, I don’t want the City to enforce.

CH: What is an an example of legal non-conforming space?

BN: If it remained consistently used as parking since prior to 90s era of zoning, then it is
grandfathered – if it does not conform to current zoning.


 4
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19

Note: This issue needs clarification in language

CP: There is a finite amount of marine dependent use; we need to accommodate them.

BN: Merrill’s wharf example -- Pierce Atwood doesn’t fit on Merrill’s Wharf. But the marine
use parking spaces are well marked.

CH: RE: Terminate use of illegal non-conforming spaces -- these are not grandfathered?

BN: Yes, there are likely spaces created after 1987 that are illegal.

SD: What will happen to private metered spaces?

BN: We’ll have to document when they were created to determine if they are legal or illegal. It
will be a thorny issue. But we need to figure out where it’s legal or illegal -- we don’t know
which ones are which except the ones that are evident.

Identify off-waterfront parking options for marine use

BN: What we’re learning from Transportation Management we need to apply. There will never
be enough waterfront parking for anyone or any group -- there just isn’t enough space period.

We need to use lessons from WEX, hospital (park and rides, etc.)

JJ: We’re looking at other locations (including Angelo’s acre to build a structured parking
garage).

MA: We’re looking for a place where our employees can park and then take a shuttle.

BN: The more cooperative we are, the more we have the opportunity to share resources. Jeff
Levine is an authority on this issue.


Abbreviated Dialog: Public, Off Street Parking

JJ: Angelo’s Acre is now open for $5.00 all day parking.

BC: Could Angelo’s lot be prioritized for waterfront users?

JJ: Enforcement would be difficult, I think.

What is the maximum number of spaces at Angelos Acre?

Peverada: Approx. 100



 5
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19
BN: Fish Pier currently prioritizes marine use. It is an example of what we’re talking about,
there is no waiting list right now to get into Fish Pier. It’s about a 160 car lot. Marine is
prioritized, both in the waiting list, and harvesters get half price.

MA: How long is the parking lease?

Peverada: Month to month.

MA: How is it enforced?

Peverada: We issue hang tags. No hang tag it gets a ticket. Angeo’s primarily serves 3
groups: islanders, low wage workers, waterfront workers.

MA: A parking garage at Angelo’s is not even part of the discussion?

BN: It’s on the table.

JJ: Before that discussion, we are looking at size and scope.

MA: Can Fish Pier have structured parking? It’s water side.

JJ: We prefer not, it’s the water side.

SD: What about the city’s eastern waterfront holdings -- will any of that be available for
parking?

JJ: That’s to be decided by the Council -- the Council will begin that discussion in the near
future.

JP: In front of Angelo’s Acre we used to have on street parking.

JJ: We’re trying to figure out structured parking at Gateway.

BR: I’ve heard rumors about moving train station to the end of Congress St.

JJ: That’s not the case -- there is some discussion to move it near Mercy hospital.

CH: What does it cost?

JJ: About $35,000 a space right now (to build a parking garage).

CH: Let’s draw the population up the hill, find a discreet place for structured parking outside of
the nmouz.

JJ: We have other things on the table right now -- maybe a passenger ferry from South Portland
-- parking would be in South Portland -- nothing concrete, however.

 6
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19

BN: Encourage people to walk, bicycle, ride-share.

DW: This is a regional issue, right? It’s a regional conversation, right? Most people who work
here don’t live here.

JJ: A good example of alternative parking is WEX. They have purchased 2 shuttles. They will
shuttle employees from a remote parking area.

Abbreviated Dialog: Public On Street Parking - Unrestricted:

What is the supply of unrestricted on-street parking?

Peverada: 50% of this supply is going away to the metered parking at Hobson’s Landing, just a
stretch from Fish Pier.
West Commercial Street in front of JB Brown and PYS is unrestricted parking, but not used
much.

KL: I’d like to keep as much of it as possible.

BN: We are looking at the creation of a marine parking hang tag system.

JJ: The working waterfront is so unique and so dependent on such a small area, there should be
some way the City can assist vessels/harvesters.

Issue 2 hang tags per boat -- to the captain, who is responsible/liable for the tags. The tags could
be renewed every year and cannot be replaced if lost.

MA: How many vessels?

JJ: 100

BN: Supply parking, but separate from building or boat. You can buy the berth or lease the
space with or without the parking.

JJ: The difference is that businesses have options/ mariners do not.

SD: I want to support hang tag system for marine users/water dependent, but on the basis that
they have to show need.

BC: John has a great idea, it’s more positive than negative.

BN: How many captains don’t have a parking space with their berths?

WS: It changes day to day. I would not give a worker one to hold onto….but would hand it out
day to day.

 7
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19

BN: What’s the right number? Two?

WS: Captains don’t need one.

DW: It’s worth a trial.

BN: Not many hourly regulated spaces on Commercial St.?

Peverada.: No, mostly metered.

BC: Could a hang tag could be used in metered space with no charge?

WS: We might not need more than 80 tags.

JJ: It can’t be open ended, there will be a defined number.

BC: Can it be sunsetted? Try it for a year or 2?

BN: What would be the geographic extent? Where will these tags be good?

Peverada: 100 or so spaces on Commercial St.

BN: Can we take a portion of unregulated spaces and add them to the metered spaces?

Note: Mr. Peverada made clear that, in public on-street parking residents with residential
parking permits can park in 1 & 2 hour spaces all day without moving, which would be in
conflict with other permits, so he suggested converting some unregulated spaces to waterfront
permit only parking. Mr. Peverada does not think any permits should be allowed at meters.

Peverada: Converting to hourly creates a conflict with residents.

John P: We could convert some unrestricted spaces to permit parking only.

JJ: Permit parking designated for marine use only.

Peverada: There is plenty of room under the bridges. (Editor’s note: needs confirmation.)

BN: If new use is created (water dependent parking use) then Fish Pier would have the ability to
expand parking supply.
There is parking for tenants of Fish Pier at the Fish Pier. The grandfathered commercial Front
Lot is full. Lot 12 is for Brown Trading, lot 1 is for potentially going to be developed..

MA: I have 45 employees, they park at Holyoke Wharf.

Peverada: We sell 207 monthly permits for 187 spaces at the Fish Pier front lot.

 8
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19

JJ: We need to take a look at IMT space under the bridge.

BN: We should bring back good map of parking supply in order to continue this discussion.

Peverada: There are 191 metered spaces on Commercial Street.

SD: Regarding the permit system, need to flush out how permits are going to be distributed in
order to prevent abuse. The target market? What is the difference between a stern man and
someone who works on a tour boat?

MA: What’s fair is fair.

BC: I do have space on Union -- I pay for it -- it’s under the assumption that I’ll use the tags
they way they’re intended. Tags are not perfect answer but it’s a start.

BN: We’ll absorb the notes, do the math, look at the numbers.

DW: Hang tags (permits) are a good start, but employees can’t abuse it.


Abbreviated Dialog: Zoning Issues:

Matthew Grooms: We feel we’ve gone as far as we can go . On April 23 we will go to the
Planning Board. The 1st hearing is in May. It’s a tight timeline, but we’ve made a lot of
progress.

Summary of proposed text amendments:

Permitted uses -- new category will be created
Uses in Commercial Street Overlay Zone -- name change from nmouz
Commercial kitchen will be added -- eliminate laundry/dry cleaning

KL: What is a commercial kitchen?

BN: A commercial kitchen would be non-marine subject to 55/45 or it would go upstairs.

What about medical offices?

CH: All it would do is cause trouble.

MGrooms: TAKE OUT MEDICAL OFFICES

CH: Prohibit drive through?

BN: Currently prohibited, with exception for uses for bait, etc., Dispensary is not permitted.

 9
 Agenda 2
 Meeting 9 notes, 4-11-19
See amendment sheets for more.

Prohibit non-marine parking within pier setback.

See summary table for marketing and targeted marketing.

Removing inventory requirement from zoning would not remove the requirement, but put it back
to City Council Order.

MA: For an existing building that is being totally renovated...

CG: An existing building does not have to change structure.

BC: What about restaurant restrictions

New restaurants are restricted within zone, they are permitted in overlay. BN encourages one
zone to prevent confusion.




 10
 Agenda 5
Dredge Funding
 Agenda 5
 Dredge Funding




E-Copy
 Agenda 5
Dredge Funding
 Agenda 5
Dredge Funding