Sustainability and Transportation Committee — Portland, ME
Date: 2025-10-08
Time: 17:00

Sustainability& Transportation MEMBERS
Committee Agenda Councilor Regina Phillips, Chair
 Councilor Pious Ali, At-Large
October 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM
 Councilor Anna Bullett, District 4




The Sustainability and Transportation
Committee will conduct this meeting
remotely via Zoom. Allow your computer to
install the free Zoom app to get the best
meeting experience. If you are not able to
attend live either in person or via Zoom, a
recording will be available in the Agenda
Center following the meeting.

For public comment via Zoom, you will need
to use the "raise your hand" feature. To raise
your hand via the telephone, please hit *9.
You will be unmuted by the host when it is
time for public comment.

https://portlandmaine-
gov.zoom.us/j/89952567500?pwd=zLf7HunT
yswwcokWAwAlXBHcv0WNXl.1




1. Review and approve minutes from September 10


 a. Minutes from September 10, 2025
2. Sustainability Program Updates


 a. Sustainability Program Updates
3. Presentation and Discussion
 Public comment may be taken
 a. Resolution supporting collaboration between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute and the City
 of Portland to build coastal resilience and support the marine economy
 Presenters: Troy Moon and David Reidmiller, Chief Impact Officer at GMRI
 Public comment will be taken
 b. Amendments to Chapter 28 - Traffic and Motor Vehicles (Section 28-51) regarding snow ban
 parking regulations
 Presenters: Tony Wirkus and Mike Murray
 Public comment will be taken
 c. Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
 Presenters: Greg Jordan, Kevin Kraft, and Patricia Quinn, Executive Director of NNEPRA
 Public comment will be taken
4. Other Business

CITY OF PORTLAND, MAINE
 Committee on Sustainability and Transportation
 Councilor Regina Phillips (D3), Chair
 Councilor Pious Ali (At-Large)
 Councilor Anna Bullett (D4)


Approved Minutes October 8, 2025
Members Present: Councilor Ali, Councilor Bullet, Councilor Michniewicz, Councilor Pelletier,
Councilor Phillips, Mayor Dion
Staff Present: Helen Donaldson, Greg Jordan, Kevin Kraft, Karly Meyer, Troy Moon, Mike
Murray, Greg Watson, Tony Wirkus

Meeting was called to order.

September 10, 2025, Meeting Minutes
The September 10, 2025, meeting minutes were approved unanimously.

Announcement
Councilor Phillips thanked Director Murray, Department of Public Works, and the Maine
Department of Transportation for their work repaving streets.

Sustainability Updates
Presented by Troy Moon and Karly Meyer, Sustainability Office
Visited Little Diamond Island and viewed their living shoreline and joined Kristina Egan at the
Greater Portland Council of Governments for their Regional Councils national conference.

The Neighborhood Mini Grants program launched to bring neighbors together.

The Sustainability Office is partnering with the Harvard Kennedy School of Government to better
understand residents’ concerns related to sea level rise and vulnerabilities.

Katie Tims, Sustainability Associate, recently gave a talk at the Senator George J. Mitchell
Center at the University of Maine on One Climate Future.

The Sustainability Office hosted Park(ing) Day at the end of September.

Mayor Dion recommended that Councilor Phillips follow up with Director Moon to watch the
video produced about the Little Diamond Island living shoreline project.
Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine Research Institute
and the City of Portland
Councilor Phillips brought forth the resolution supporting the collaboration between the Gulf of
Maine Research Institute and the City of Portland to build coastal resilience and support the
marine economy.

Councilor Phillips asked Mayor Dion if this is something that should be read at a full council
meeting and if it is something that could be put on the agenda.

Mayor Dion stated that it would be on the agenda.

Director Moon read the resolution.

Public Comment on Resolution Supporting the Collaboration Between the Gulf of Maine
Research Institute and the City of Portland
Seeing no one wishing to make public comments, the comment period was closed.

Councilor Bullet motioned to bring the resolution before the full council. Councilor Ali seconded
the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Amendment to Chapter 28
Presented by Tony Wirkus and Mike Murray
Proposing to change the ticketing for leaving a car on the street during a city parking ban for
snow removal efforts from $40 to $175. Historically, the City has operated the Ocean Gateway
parking lot as an impound lot. However, this lot is slated to become a city park, and will no
longer be available for vehicles.

Currently, the fee structure is such that if you are towed, you pay $135 and a $40 citation. If you
are not towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not permitted to park it, you only
pay a $40 citation.

The proposed change would be such that if you are towed, you would pay $40. If you are not
towed, but you leave your car in an area where you are not allowed to park it, you would pay a
$175 citation.

Director Wirkus stated that this looks at a fee structure that ensures it is worth the time and
effort to move your vehicle, so that our public works team can adequately plow the roads and
emergency vehicles can access roads.

In addition to revising the fee structure, the proposal increases the amount of parking space
available during snow bans to include the following areas: parking along Marginal Way until Maj.
Charles J. Loring Memorial Park, Rainbow Mall Road next to the woods, Saint James and
Douglas Streets next to the park, Valley Street south of C Street next to the park. None of these
parking locations are in front of someone’s residence.
Councilor Bullet asked if Director Wirkus could attend her district meeting on December 7 to
discuss parking along Rainbow Mall Road and if communication efforts could be increased by
encouraging residents to sign up for text messages.

Councilor Ali asked how we landed on this fee. Director Wirkus stated that this is below $200,
which is the current fee for parking in an ADA-designated parking spot. That fee is similar, since
it is also blocking accessibility. The tow fee, impound fee, and citation were adding up to over
$200, and so the rate for leaving a car on the street during a snow ban was set to be below
$200.

Public Comment on Amendment to Chapter 28
 ❖​ One resident commented that they are a property manager and higher fines don’t
 necessarily create the reactions one is looking for, but rather consistency in
 enforcement. A drastic change is pretty concerning. Appreciates options for more
 parking. Wants to create a solution before penalizing people. Noted that other areas
 don’t have parking ban fees above $100. Fines are often considered a tax.
 ❖​ Comments were made that this will penalize people; people don’t even know that there
 will be a parking ban or that the city tows. The City is fining people who are not aware of
 what is happening.
 ❖​ A comment was made that the parking ban ends at seven o’clock and you have to move
 your car by seven, which is hard to do. The ban should end at six and cars should be
 moved by seven.
 ❖​ A comment was made that once in a while, parking bans get extended and called much
 too early. Does not approve of the increase and encourages the committee to send this
 back to staff.
 ❖​ A commenter stated that they were very supportive of changes to the policy, both the fee
 structure and adding new snow ban lots. A new development came to Libbytown, and
 the concern was that they would not add much surface parking. The neighborhood was
 supportive of not adding more surface parking. By creating more snow ban lots, we are
 able to have fewer off-street parking lots. Raising the fines is regrettably necessary. It is
 comparable to a cigarette tax, and it may be regressive, but some regressive taxes are
 necessary.
 ❖​ A commenter stated that they were inclined to support the city staff’s proposal.
 Suggested that the impact on lower-income households is something we could mitigate.
 If residents can show their eligibility for food stamps or Section 8 housing, could receive
 a discount of 50%.
 ❖​ A comment was made in support of the increase in availability of options. It is stressful to
 come home from working out of town and find that all of the snow ban parking is taken.
 Around 2,700 snow ban parking spots exist on peninsula; suggested City encourage or
 mandate other garage owners to allow use of garages for parking.

Mayor Dion commented that on the criminal side, increasing fines rarely changes behaviour. He
would like an analysis of enforcement, including how many tow trucks are deployed and how
many officers are available to help remove vehicles. He stated that he is more concerned about
capacity to remove vehicle rather than fining someone. The likelihood of getting towed is more
of a deterrent than a fine.

Councilor Michniewicz commented that there have been fluctuations in the number of people
available. Sees the life-safety issue of such narrow streets. Asks if there is an option to have a
fee between $40 and $175. Asks if there is a gradual fee structure option, like with sidewalk
shoveling.

Assistant City Manager Jordan stated that they could certainly provide data on the strain this
places on the police department. This is a forced-overtime situation for police. The City could try
to quantify the lack of coordination from tow drivers. Thirdly, the loss of the tow lot will impact
things. Can do more work looking at how fines are raised and how populations respond.
Recognized that communication is a big part of this.

Mayor Dion would like to know how we target our limited resources, and if we target certain
areas.

Councilor Pelletier recognized the difficult position. It is expensive to use tow trucks. Would like
to see data on effectiveness of fines. Would also like to see discount on fines for low-income
residents. Would love to see community partners lend their parking spaces.

Councilor Michniewicz asks if impound lot needs to be enclosed or if it can be an open surface
lot. Director Wirkus responded that it needs to be able to be secured.

Councilor Michniewicz stated that during recent conversations about music venues, they looked
at night parking availability, and that there was lots of parking. Suggested that some of those
lots could be pressed into service for this.

Councilor Phillips reiterated that education is key, additional spaces within garages, WEX or
Roux building parking, and asked what happens when a car does get towed. Are you not just
paying the tow truck company? Director Wirkus stated that yes, you just would pay $40 as a
citation, and the $135 would be to the tow truck company for use of their equipment. Councilor
Phillips asked if the committee was under the gun for this proposal. Assistant City Manager
Jordan confirmed that if this went to the council and then back to the committee, it would likely
not be put in place until snow season, which would be too late.

Motion to raise the fee to $175 with some of the changes suggested by the committee.
Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Phillips seconded. The motion passed unanimously.

Amtrak Downeaster Location
Presented by Assistant City Manager Greg Jordan
Assistant City Manager Jordan provided an overview. Proposed move of location from its
current location to the Main Line, which is the track directly parallel to Saint John Street. A site
study in 2021 conducted by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT) concluded that a
location parallel to Congress Street would be most advantageous. A follow-up study in 2024 by
the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) looked at three locations and
concluded that a location on the Maine Line along Saint John Street adjacent to the Mercy
Hospital, referred to as Site Three. NNEPRA adopted the recommendations in the plan. From
the beginning of the discussions, City staff have communicated concerns to NNEPRA. City staff
appreciate NNEPRA meeting, however, staff have not been convinced that Site Three is in the
best interests of Portland. NNEPRA has been invited here to present why Site Three is the best
location, as well as City staff to present their assessment and recommendation, and the Greater
Portland Council of Governments, which administers the regional transportation program, to
share their perspective.

Presented by Patricia Quinn, Executive Director of NNEPRA
Provided a brief overview of the history and structure of NNEPRA, NNEPRA’s role as operating
partners for Amtrak Downeaster partners. Provided statistics on the Downeaster trips, ridership,
and passenger destinations. Goal of NNEPRA is to provide more trains with shorter travel times
to connect more trains to more destinations. Have received federal funds to open a station in
Falmouth. Provided overview of Wells Area Improvement Project. This will enable an additional
trip to be added between Wells and Brunswick running every day. The northbound train would
arrive in Portland around 7:55AM. The biggest barrier is that the Portland station is not very
accessible to the downtown currently.

The other issue with the Portland station is that it is currently located down a one-way street,
taking 15 minutes for the train to stop and turn around. This adds cost and makes the train less
competitive.

Ms. Quinn presented a vision for a new mainline station where there are two tracks, making the
stop two minutes. A map and schematic of where the new station location was presented.
Increased connectivity to a variety of locations were discussed. Ms. Quinn noted past studies
supporting moving train stations, as well as stakeholder and public outreach and engagement in
the 2024 plan. Noted support from Maine DOT, Maine Legislature Transportation Committee,
Towns of Brunswick and Wells, Amtrak, and others. Noted request from City of Portland to
conduct an analysis that includes a no-build option and a cost-benefit analysis of all reasonable
alternatives. Ms. Quinn noted plans and challenges for each of the three options evaluated by
NNEPRA. Mr. Dale Doughty, Acting Commissioner of NNEPRA, added additional reasons which
inform and motivate NNEPRA’s plan to change station locations.

Amtrak Downeaster Station Relocation
Presented by Kevin Kraft, Development Director
Discussed site selection of process, role of City in the site selection process. Summarized
historic and current regional transportation plans, as well as implementation process of plans.
Discussed outcomes of 2021 study conducted by City, NNEPRA, Concord Coach Lines, Metro,
PACTS, and other key partners, led by Maine Department of Transportation (DOT). Explained
benefits and drawbacks of each station, from the perspective of the City and the 2021 study.
Presented national examples of integrating rail into downtowns, rail lines located near grade
crossings. Reviewed history of statements made by city on NNEPRA proposal of station move.


Portland Station Relocation - Regional Context
Kristina Egan, Executive Director, Greater Portland Council of Governments (GPCOG)
Discussed goals and role of GPCOG. Goal of GPCOG is cohesion of all regional transportation.
Discussed 2021 study, the goal of which was to analyze whether or not to decouple Concord
Coach Lines from Amtrak Downeaster site. Discussed opportunity costs and benefits of
investing in rail. Reviewed regional transportation goals: make transit easier, create frequent
connections, invest in rapid transit, create transit-friendly places. Preferred Site 2 over Site 3.

Kevin Kraft concluded staff recommendation for Site 2 over Site 3, emphasized investments and
benefits of current station location, identified pathways forward for Council.

Public Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
 ❖​ Support for Site 2 includes transit, bike/ped, and development potential; is most effective
 to meet accessibility goals, land use and planning goals, and holistic community needs;
 proximity to Congress Street and METRO stop is important; revitalizes historic location
 of original use and serves regional and local goals; advances TOD and multimodal
 access; recognition that City staff, regional planners at GPCOG, and the neighborhood
 organizations in/around this site all prefer Site 2.
 ❖​ Opposition for Site 2 includes the concern around land ownership, safety considerations
 related to a 3rd rail crossing Congress St and downtime signals with multiple track
 crossings and vehicle delays, and platform landing on County jail property.
 ❖​ Support for Site 3 includes concern that the City is ignoring the operational difficulties of
 Site 2 and MaineHealth’s preference for Site 3; quick access to MaineHealth and Mercy
 shuttle.
 ❖​ Opposition on Site 3 includes inconsistency with City’s Comprehensive Plan; requires
 significant industrial restructuring.
 ❖​ Concern that the study done to determine size of proposed parking lot is insufficient;
 concern for the impact to surrounding area; concern that carbon emissions were not a
 consideration in the study; concern that MaineHealth is landbanking area with no plan
 for improvement/development to Union Plaza; concern for the cost benefit of this
 potential project.

Councilor Comment on Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
Jim Cohen recognizes NNEPRA’s lengthy process to analyze the feasibility of and public input
surrounding this topic. The information presented by City staff has not been seen until today.
Reiterates the following conclusions around reduction of carbon emissions, land ownership and
control on those outcomes.

Greg Jordan recognizes the property ownership concerns, but those issues are downstream
from this conversation at this time.
Dale Doughty notes that Maine DOT and City agree on reassessing Libbytown traffic patterns,
after their federal grant funding was rescinded, and we don’t see a funding path forward anytime
in the near future. MEDOT wants to continue partnering with all parties to determine the best
site, even if the alternatives are not in Portland.

Patricia Quinn reaffirms that Site 3 would support Transit Oriented Development. She goes on
to review some of the regional and service-related changes since the study was conducted
during COVID.

Councilor Bullett notes that Portland’s train station should be urban and future planning means
planning for a future without cars. Councilor Bullett asks if there was in-state ridership modeling
done between Site 3 vs Site 2. Patricia Quinn says they did not, since the sites are so close to
each other. Councilor Bullett asks Dale Doughty, MaineDOT, to expand on the federal grant
clawbacks mentioned. There are still federal grants being announced, we can get you more
details on those. We didn’t get public comment from Mercy or MaineHealth, and just wanted to
make sure they are aware of this public comment. Greg Jordan mentioned that representatives
of MaineHealth on the attendee side, we have corresponded with property owners, but
confirming that we did not receive public comment from either organizations. Councilor Bullett
shares her support for the alternatives analysis and re-emphasizes the key to walkability to the
train station.

Councilor Pelletier asks if Site 3 is up for sale? Patricia Quinn states that we have had
conversations with all property owners impacted by Site 3 and all have expressed their
willingness to work with us. Is the only feasible layover facility the one mentioned on the
Mountain Branch? The primary layover facility is in Brunswick and would still be able to be
accessed by any new station, some of them just require the backup movement and multiple
movements. Is there an implication that Amtrak would no longer service Portland if there isn’t a
favorable outcome here? I think we were talking about ‘what’s next’ such that if we go back and
conduct an alternatives analysis and we determine that Falmouth is the most viable alternative,
because of the limited viable spaces available in Portland, then that may be the outcome. If we
moved to conduct an alternative analysis and work with MaineHealth to find a compromise.

Councilor Ali asks Mayor Dion if there was other sources of funding that could be accessed to
help fund this study? Mayor Dion submit this project for analysis in the U.S. Mayor’s Conference
design guidance for land use issues. There is an opportunity for us to work together and hard
bargain for what something could look like, but perhaps a third party can help us determine what
is in the best interest of all.

Councilor Michniewicz shares her support for the Mayor’s advice on collaborating with a
third-party and for all members not backing away from this conversation.

Mayor Dion suggests Legal should provide clarity on land acquisitions and other relevant
issues.
Councilor Phillips notes her appreciation for the public comment concerning parking lot size.
Councilor Phillips goes on to remind us of all of our City planning documents that outline our
goals and aspirations that direct this work. So many of these documents outline our concern for
public safety. Site 3 does not have sufficient connection with METRO lines. There are five
businesses co-located with Site 3, all of which would have to move if Site 3 was selected. That
is certainly a concern that has not been noted tonight. Councilor Phillips shares her surprise that
a facilitated conversation has not happened already.

Greg Jordan suggests that a facilitated discussion would be couched within the greater
alternatives analysis and further technical and financial studies.

Councilor Phillips suggests we need to change the recommendation before us, being step 1
being a facilitated discussion with a third party and step 2 conducting an alternative study.
Councilor Bullett adds that those steps could happen simultaneously. Financial cost
breakdowns, land ownership, and legal analysis of the options at hand.

Motion to Recommend an Alternative Study for the Amtrak Downeaster Station Location
and an Additional Directive for Staff to Engage NNEPRA in the Solicitation of a Mediator
to Provide the Objective Data to Inform the Committee
Councilor Bullett motioned and Councilor Ali seconded. The motion passed unanimously, 3-0.

Motion to Adjourn
The motion was moved by Councilor Bullett and seconded by Councilor Ali.
The motion was approved 3-0.

Meeting Adjourned