City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-08-26
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Friday, August 26, 2022

 10:00 AM
 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL
 CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT VACANT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 1
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings

The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at
https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213)
621-CITY (Metro), (818) 904-9450 (Valley), (310) 471-CITY (Westside), and (310) 547-CITY (San Pedro Area). If the
live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.

Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in-person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in-
person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full
Covid-19 vaccination or of a negative Covid-19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall
building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a
phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid-19 test. Additionally, pursuant
to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test.
Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.

Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the
Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For
Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.

Telecommunication Relay Services

Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to
advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are
deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating
to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay
service (TRS) communications.

Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to
place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S.
territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for
the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.

What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and
the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-
English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video
Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-
relay-service-trs.

Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello.
This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS
provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.

For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with
disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.


SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO
MUNICIPAL




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 2
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council
meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are
available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring
Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an
item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the
posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be
called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the
Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has
requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example,
all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed
agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more
of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will
be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items
for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple
Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to
one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of
20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be
limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The
Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms
with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by
the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a
question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited
to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical
ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 3
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law
may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More
information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213)
978-1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by
the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a
question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited
to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical
ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must
vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any
member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the
Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally
voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and
once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the
agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable
and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the
matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular
meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other
designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the
Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the
City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must
vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any
member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the
Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally
voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and
once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the
agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable
and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the
matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 4
meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other
designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the
Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the
City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it
having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during
a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 5
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Friday, August 26, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 20-0602
 CDs 6, 11 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fifth Amendment to a
 contract with Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. to extend the term and
 increase contract authority for the migration of cameras to the existing
 video management system, for configuration of cameras installed
 under the capital improvement projects, and for ongoing maintenance,
 repair, and support services for the Closed Circuit Television Video
 Surveillance and Intelligent Observation Network of Los Angeles World
 Airports (LAWA) .

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport Commissioners
 (Board) that this action is exempt from the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article ll, Section
 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE the Fifth Amendment to Contract DA-5212 with
 Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. to extend the term through
 July 31, 2023 and increase the contract authority by $6,413,030,
 for new total not to exceed $14,087,962, for migration of cameras
 to the existing video management system, for configuration of
 cameras installed under the capital improvement projects, and




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 6
 for ongoing maintenance, repair, and support services for the
 Closed Circuit Television Video Surveillance and Intelligent
 Observation Network of LAWA.
 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on June 2, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27514, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee,
 of LAWA, to execute said Fifth Amendment to Contract DA-5212
 with Integrated Security Solutions, Inc.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022)



(2) 22-0833
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM REPORT relative to approving the First Amendment to
 contracts with Kambrian Corporation and Zones LLC, covering
 purchase of software licenses, renewals, and support services for the
 Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA).

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport Commissioners
 (Board) that this action is exempt from the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article ll, Section
 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE the First Amendment to Contracts DA-5375 with
 Kambrian Corporation and DA-5376 with Zones LLC, to extend
 their respective terms by six months and increase their
 respective contract authorities by $4,250,600, for new total not to
 exceed $20,250,600 each, covering purchase of software
 licenses, renewals, and support services for LAWA.
 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on June 2, 2022, by Resolution
 No. 27515, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, or designee,
 LAWA, to execute said First Amendment to Contracts DA-5375
 with Kambrian Corporation and DA-5376 with Zones LLC.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 7
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 19, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 16, 2022)



(3) 22-0865
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM REPORT relative to approving Board Resolution No. 22-
 10004, which authorizes Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) Operating
 Agreement with DSV Air and Sea, Inc.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Harbor
 Commissioners (Board) that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Article ll, Section 2(f) of
 the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 22-10004
 authorizing proposed approval of FTZ Operating Agreement 22-
 9868 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and
 DSV Air and Sea, Inc.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022)



(4) 22-0802
 TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM REPORT relative to the Port of Los
 Angeles (POLA) Fiscal Year 2022-23 Statement of Debt Accountability
 and Capital Improvement Plan.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 8
 Recommendation for Council action:
 RECEIVE and FILE the POLA report dated July 1, 2022, relative to the
 Department’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Statement of Debt Accountability
 and Capital Improvement Plan.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(5) 22-0787
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the acceptance of
 the Fiscal Year 2020 (FY 20) Emergency Management Performance
 Grant (EMPG).

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Emergency Management
 Department (EMD), or designee to:

 a. Retroactively apply for and accept the FY 20 EMPG in the
 amount of $640,259 from the Department of Homeland Security,
 Federal Emergency Management Agency for the period of July 1,
 2020 through June 30, 2022 to support emergency management
 salary expenses.
 b. Execute the subrecipient agreement, included as an attachment
 to the EMD report dated April 13, 2022, attached to Council file
 No. 22-0787, between the City and the County of Los Angeles, to
 receive grant funding in the amount of $640,259 for a term of
 July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022, subject to the approval of
 the City Attorney as to form.
 c. Identify spending up to the total grant amount of $640,259 in
 accordance with the grant award agreement and performance
 period.
 d. Submit grant reimbursement requests to the County of Los
 Angeles and deposit the grant receipts into the General Fund,
 Department No. 35, Revenue Source Code No. 3684, Other
 Federal Grants.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that acceptance of the FY 20 EMPG in the amount of $640,259 is
 necessary to realize anticipated General Fund grant receipts assumed
 in the Adopted Budget for the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations provided in this report are in compliance with the
 City's Financial Policies in that one-time grant funding will be utilized
 for grant-eligible program expenditures to support emergency
 preparedness initiatives.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(6) 22-0733
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Supplemental
 Police Account (SPA) First Quarterly Report - January through March
 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the SPA First Quarterly Report, attached to the Board of
 Police Commissioners (BPC) report dated June 16, 2022, attached to
 Council file No. 22-0733.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the BPC. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed
 a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(7) 22-0743
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation valued
 at $85,000 to be used for psychology services for the Los Angeles Fire
 Department (LAFD) from the LAFD Foundation.

 Recommendations for Council action:




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 10
 1. APPROVE the acceptance of a donation valued at $85,000 to be
 used for psychology services for the LAFD from the LAFD
 Foundation; and, THANK the donor for this generous donation.
 2. AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, LAFD, or designee, to negotiate and
 execute any agreements necessary to effectuate the City's
 acceptance and deployment of the donated supplemental
 services.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Fire Commissioners reports the
 there is no fiscal impact to the LAFD’s budget from the acceptance of
 this donation. Donations provide the necessary items meeting the
 needs of the respective fire stations or administration sections.
 Replacement or repair of items meeting City specifications and LAFD
 business needs may be borne by General Fund, subject to budgetary
 constraints.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(8) 22-0841
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation of two
 commercial-grade washers and dryers valued at $8,858 to the Los
 Angeles Fire Department (LAFD Fire Station 61) from the First-In Fire
 Foundation.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the acceptance of a donation of two commercial-grade
 washers and dryers, valued at $8,858 to Fire Station 61 from the First-
 In Fire Foundation; and, THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Fire Commissioners reports the
 there is no fiscal impact to the LAFD’s budget from the acceptance of
 this donation. Donations provide the necessary items meeting the
 needs of the respective fire stations or administration sections.
 Replacement or repair of items meeting City specifications and LAFD
 business needs may be borne by General Fund, subject to budgetary
 constraints.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 11
(9) 22-0786
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation valued
 at $138,300, to be used for the Los Angeles Police Department’s
 (LAPD) Air Support Division’s Electronic Flight Instrument System
 upgrade kit from the Air Support Angels Foundation.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the acceptance of a donation valued at $138,300, to be
 used for the LAPD's Air Support Division's Electronic Flight Instrument
 System upgrade kit from the Air Support Angels Foundation; and,
 THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police
 Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(10) 22-0282
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2021 Connect
 and Protect Law Enforcement Behavioral Health Response Program
 (Connect and Protect) application.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department
 (LAPD), or designee, to retroactively apply for, negotiate, and
 accept a grant award of $550,000 relative to the 2021 Connect
 and Protect: Law Enforcement Behavioral Health Response
 Program (Connect and Protect) from the Bureau of Justice
 Assistance (BJA) within the United States Department of Justice,
 for a three-year term that began on October 1, 2021, through
 September 30, 2024, and execute any documents or agreements
 necessary to accept the grant funds, subject to the approval by
 the City Attorney as to form.
 2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to deposit the 2021 Connect and Protect
 grant funds, received under this cooperative agreement, into the




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 12
 Police Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, account number to
 be determined.
 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish a grant receivable and
 appropriate up to $550,000 within the Police Department Grant
 Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, for
 disbursement of the BJA 2021 Connect and Protect grant funds.
 4. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, LAPD, or designee, to negotiate
 and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Justice &
 Security Strategies, Inc., a subrecipient agency, for a term within
 the applicable grant performance period, for a sum not to exceed
 $150,000, for the provision of grant research partner services,
 subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
 5. TRANSFER $100,000 from the Police Department Grant Fund
 No. 339/70, account number to be determined to Fund No.
 100/70, Account No. 001092, Overtime Sworn.
 6. TRANSFER the 2021 Connect and Protect grant funds from
 Fund No. 339/70, Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police
 Grants Related Costs, for fringe benefits and related costs upon
 submission of proper documentation by LAPD, subject to City
 Administrative Officer (CAO) approval of the related costs
 incurred during the grant performance period.
 7. INSTRUCT the LAPD to reprogram a portion of the 2021
 Connect and Protect grant funds to reflect eligible related cost
 reimbursements for the use of sworn overtime.
 8. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for any
 technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and
 Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to
 retroactively accept the 2021 Connect and Protect grant award of up to
 $550,000 from the United States Department of Justice, BJA, for a
 three year term that began on October 1, 2021 through September 30,
 2024. Acceptance of this award requires the City to provide a grant
 match of $195,602 over the three year term. Funding for the City
 match requirement, which includes partial salaries and related costs
 for one Sergeant II and one Detective III, is provided through existing
 budgeted funds within the LAPD budget. There is no additional impact
 on the General Fund. The grant reimbursements for related costs will
 deposited into Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police Grants Related




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 13
 Costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that, to the extent possible, current operations will be
 funded by current revenues.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(11) 22-0417
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2021
 Collaborative Approaches Towards Preventing and Addressing Hate
 Crime Program (Hate Crime) application.

 ​Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department
 (LAPD), or designee, to retroactively apply for, negotiate, and
 accept a grant award of $833,333 relative to the 2021 Hate
 Crime grant program from the Bureau of Justice Assistance
 (BJA) within the United States Department of Justice, for a three-
 year term that began on October 1, 2021, through September 30,
 2024, and execute any documents or agreements necessary to
 accept the grant funds, subject to the approval by the City
 Attorney as to form.
 2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to deposit the 2021 Hate Crime grant
 funds, received under this cooperative agreement, into the Police
 Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, account number to be
 determined.
 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish a grant receivable and
 appropriate up to $833,333 within the Police Department Grant
 Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, for
 disbursement of the BJA 2021 Hate Crime grant funds.
 4. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, LAPD, or designee, to negotiate
 and execute a Professional Services Agreement with Justice &
 Security Strategies, Inc., a subrecipient agency, for a term within
 the applicable grant performance period, for a sum not to exceed
 $229,208, for the provision of grant research partner services,
 subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 14
 5. TRANSFER $206,250 from the Police Department Grant Fund
 No. 339/70, account number to be determined to the following
 accounts:
 a. $163,750 to Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001092,
 Overtime Sworn.
 b. $42,500 to Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001090,
 Overtime Civilian.
 6. TRANSFER the 2021 Hate Crime grant funds from Fund 339/70,
 Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police Grants Related Costs,
 for fringe benefits and related costs upon submission of proper
 documentation by LAPD, subject to City Administrative Officer
 (CAO) approval of the related costs incurred during the grant
 performance period.

 7. INSTRUCT the LAPD to reprogram a portion of grant funds to
 reflect related cost reimbursements in support of the sworn and
 civilian overtime salaries.
 8. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for any
 technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and
 Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to
 retroactively accept the 2021 Hate Crime grant award of up to
 $833,333 from the United States Department of Justice, BJA, for a
 three year term beginning on October 1, 2021 through September 30,
 2024. There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of these
 recommendations. No matching funds are required for this grant.
 Reimbursements are expected to increase by $27,740 and will be
 deposited into Revenue Source Code No. 5349 Police Grants Related
 Costs for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 and 2023-24.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized to fund grant activities.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 15
(12) 20-1590
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2020
 Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Capacity Enhancement and Backlog
 Reduction (CEBR) Program Grant.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to
 transfer funds totaling $441,564 within the 2020 DNA CEBR
 Program Grant, approved by the United States Department of
 Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
 2. TRANSFER $153,317 from the Police Department Fund No.
 100/70, Account No. 001090, Overtime General to the Police
 Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, Account No. 70T502, 2020
 DNA CEBR Program.
 3. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to reprogram a portion of the 2020 DNA
 CEBR Program Grant funds to pursue eligible related cost
 reimbursements for the use of civilian overtime and transfer the
 2020 DNA CEBR Program Grant funds from Fund No. 339/70,
 Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police Grant Related Costs, for
 fringe benefits and related costs upon submission of proper
 documentation by LAPD, subject to City Administrative Officer
 (CAO) approval of the related costs incurred during the grant
 performance period.
 4. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for any
 technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and
 Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will allow the LAPD to
 reprogram $441,564 in grant funds from the 2020 DNA CEBR Program
 for the purchase of additional DNA reagent kits and equipment. There
 is no City match required under the grant terms. There is no additional
 impact on the General Fund.
 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that, to the extent possible, current operations will be
 funded by current revenues.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 16
(13) 22-0889
 CD 6 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a refund claim
 filed by Pacific Bell Telephone for a Utility Permit located at 7956 North
 Lankershim Boulevard.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the Claim for Refund, Reference No. 3210, for Utility Permit
 U-1981-3594, in the amount of $104,119.59, to the claimant Pacific
 Bell Telephone.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Public Works reports that funds
 for Claim for Refund in the amount of $104,119.59 for the Claimant,
 Pacific Bell Telephone, is available in the Street Damage Restoration
 Fee Spec, Fund No. 41A/50, Department Revenue Source No. 428601
 for $103,844.60; General Fund, Fund No. 100/86, Department
 Revenue Source No. 329301 for $257; and the BOE Equip and
 Training Trust, Fund No. 568/50 Department Revenue Source No.
 435601 for $17.99.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(14) 15-0411-S1
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Bridge
 Improvement Program – Seismic Bond Total Budget (BIP Seismic
 Budget) new baseline program budget.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. APPROVE BIP Seismic Budget of $463 million, as the new
 baseline program budget.
 2. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to report annually with a
 revised BIP Seismic Budget.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Seismic Governance Committee reports
 that there is no additional General Fund impact beyond monies
 authorized for this purpose as part of the 2022-23 Adopted City
 Budget.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 17
(15) 22-0846
 CD 10 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a contract with
 Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI) to design and construct an
 illuminated cultural gateway at the intersection of Normandie Avenue
 and Olympic Boulevard.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two members,
 to execute the proposed contract with LANI to design and construct an
 illuminated cultural gateway at the intersection of Normandie Avenue
 and Olympic Boulevard for a total term of four years and a total
 amount of $3,630,933.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports
 that there is no General Fund impact. Approval of the proposed
 contract will result in the expenditure of $3,630,933 in City special
 funds. Sufficient funds exist to support the proposed contract.
 Maintenance costs will be incorporated into the annual City budget.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed
 contract complies with the City Financial Policies as sufficient funds
 exist to support this expenditure.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 23, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)




(16) 22-0860
 CD 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to issuing a
 revocable permit to allow the property owner at 4344 Eagle Rock
 Boulevard to close, gate, occupy, demolish, excavate, and commence
 construction of permanent structures within the existing public right-of-
 way prior to the recordation of the Final Tract Map.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 18
 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo –
 Harris-Dawson):

 INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to issue a revocable permit,
 subject to satisfaction of the conditions for issuing such permit, to allow
 the property owner at 4344 Eagle Rock Boulevard to close, gate,
 occupy, demolish, excavate, and commence construction of permanent
 structures within the existing public right-of-way prior to the recordation
 of Final Tract Map No. 74750-SL.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(17) 22-0696
 CD 5 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to initiating consideration of a proposed General Plan
 Amendment (GPA), Zone and Height District Change Ordinance, and
 environmental clearance, to amend the Exposition Corridor Transit
 Neighborhood Specific Plan (Ordinance No. 186402) for the property
 located at 8905 Venice Boulevard.

 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz –
 Harris-Dawson):

 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP), to prepare a
 GPA, Zone and Height District Change Ordinance, and
 environmental clearance, for the property located at 8905 Venice
 Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90034; and, thereby initiate
 consideration of a GPA to the Community Commercial land use
 designation, and accompanying Zone and Height District Change
 to the Commercial Zone (C2), Height District 3.
 2. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, to
 prepare and present an Ordinance to amend the Exposition
 Corridor Transit Neighborhood Specific Plan (Ordinance No.
 186402), for the proposed commercial development which
 exceeds the Specific Plan's Floor Area Ratio and height
 limitations, for said property located at 8905 Venice Boulevard.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 19
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the
 Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(18) 12-0460-S6
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to a First Amended and Restated Agreement to Contract No.
 C-122418 with Code Studio, Inc. to increase compensation, extend the
 term, and expand the scope of work; for the continued provision of
 consulting services relative to a complete rewrite and simplification of
 the City’s Zoning Code.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the Director of Planning, Department of City Planning, or
 designee, to execute the proposed First Amended and Restated
 Agreement to Contract No. C-122418 with Code Studio, Inc. to
 increase compensation by $225,000, for a total compensation amount
 of $5,263,000; extend the contract term for six months, for a revised
 term from June 25, 2013 to December 25, 2022; and, expand the
 Scope of Work to include the drafting of zoning districts and tools
 needed to support additional Community Plan Updates, in substantial
 conformance with the draft Amended and Restated Agreement
 attached to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May 31,
 2022, attached to the Council file, subject to the review and approval of
 the City Attorney as to form and compliance with the City’s contracting
 requirements.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund. Funding will be provided by the Long-Range
 Planning Fund No. 52F.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies in that the proposed
 Agreement will be supported by special funds.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 5, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 2, 2022)




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 20
(19) 22-0502
 CD 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the properties
 located at 1900-1914 West 8th Street and 805-807 South Bonnie Brae
 Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:
 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Article 19, Section 15332 (Class 32), and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP)
 as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
 Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and
 THEREBY SUSTAIN the Director of Planning’s determination in
 approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental
 clearance for a proposed Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities
 (TOC) Affordable Housing project involving the demolition of two
 existing one-story commercial buildings and surface parking
 areas for the construction, use, and maintenance of a new
 seven-story, approximately 85 feet-high mixed-use building with
 64 residential units, and approximately 1,000 square feet of
 commercial space on the ground floor; seven of the proposed
 residential units will be set aside for Extremely Low Income
 household occupancy for a period of 55 years to satisfy the TOC
 program requirements; the proposed building will encompass
 approximately 50,216 square feet in total building area, resulting
 in a Floor Area Ratio of approximately 3.6:1; the project proposes
 to provide 34 automobile parking spaces on the ground floor,
 including 32 residential vehicle parking spaces and two
 commercial vehicle parking spaces; and, will also provide 53
 long-term bicycle parking spaces and eight short-term bicycle
 parking spaces; for the properties located at 1900-1914 West 8th
 Street and 805-807 South Bonnie Brae Street.

 Applicant: Troy White, West 8th & Bonnie Brae, LLC
 Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
 Case No. DIR-2021-8104-TOC-VHCA
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-8105-CE-1A




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 21
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed
 a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(20) 22-0485
 CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a
 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the
 property located at 950- 962 ½ South Berendo Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Section 15332, Article 19 (Class 32), and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP)
 as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
 Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and
 THEREBY SUSTAIN the Director of Planning’s determination in
 approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental
 clearance for a proposed Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities
 Affordable Housing project involving the construction of a new
 77-unit apartment building on one parcel comprised of one lot;
 the building is proposed to be 92 feet, 4 inches (at its highest
 point), built to eight stories and one roof deck; with 33 studio
 units, 31 one-bedroom units, and 13 two-bedroom units; eight of
 the units will be set aside for Extremely Low Income household
 occupancy for a period of 55 years; the project proposes one
 level of at-grade parking and one level of subterranean parking
 containing 39 automobile parking spaces, 60 long-term bicycle
 spaces, and five short-term bicycle spaces; for the property
 located at 950- 962 ½ South Berendo Street.

 Applicant: Fred Shaffer, Berendo Los Angeles Apartments, LLC
 Representative: Dana Sayles/Sara Houghton, three6ixty
 Case No. DIR-2021-9706-TOC-HCA
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-9707-CE



 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 22
 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed
 a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(21) 22-0816
 CD 12 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the property located
 at 9450 North Shirley Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Section 15332, Article 19, Class 32, and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the North Valley Area Planning
 Commission (NVAPC) as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Supporters Alliance
 for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), and THEREBY
 SUSTAIN the determination of the NVAPC in approving a
 Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a
 project involving the construction of a new 309,169 square-foot,
 five-story, 350-unit multi-family residential building, and a new
 six-level, 466-stall above-grade automobile parking garage; for
 the property located at 9450 North Shirley Avenue.

 Applicant: James Varsamis, GGP Northridge Fashion Center, LP
 Representative: Josh Guyer, Burns & Bouchard, Inc.
 Case No. DIR-2021-7970-SPR-VHCA-1A
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-7971-CE

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The NVAPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 23
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(22) 21-0972
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to options for an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) in
 the City, considerations for the development of incentive programs for
 100 percent affordable housing projects, and related matters.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP), in
 consultation with the City Attorney, to prepare and present an
 Ordinance with tailored incentives in different contexts, as well as
 ministerial approval, for 100 percent affordable housing projects
 that meet objective criteria, including the following:
 a. For projects located on land already zoned for multi-family
 housing (at least five units), expand upon and exceed
 existing affordable housing incentives, including
 consideration of form-based density limits, an expanded
 menu of incentives (floor area, height, parking, commercial
 or ground-floor requirements, etc.), and ministerial approval
 of defined waivers or modifications. Focus these efforts
 particularly in commercial (C) zones, transit areas, and on
 corridors.
 b. Develop unique zoning incentive strategies to more easily
 allow 100 percent affordable housing on publicly-owned
 land [Public Facilities Zones (PF), Parking Zones (P and
 PB), land owned or leased by faith-based institutions, and
 certain industrial- zoned (M) land located on corridors when
 consistent with General Plan Policies].
 c. For projects located in lower density multi-family residential
 zones (R2 and RD zones that allow less than five units)
 that do not currently qualify for affordable housing
 incentives, allow contextual modifications to existing zoning
 regulations, including modestly increased development
 envelopes (height/floor area ratio) with density limits to
 promote a mix of housing types and deviations from
 standards such as building separation, passageway,
 parking, and setbacks.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 24
 2. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO), to identify funding for contractual
 services to prepare an economic feasibility study and stakeholder
 engagement process, further analyze the following issues in
 order to maximize production of affordable housing using the
 zoning tool described above, particularly in higher resource
 areas, and to affirmatively further fair housing, including the
 following:
 a. Variations in the level of incentives and development
 standards in higher resource areas, as well as based on
 proximity to transit, activity centers, and major corridors.
 b. Potential non-applicability in High-Segregation and Poverty
 Areas (per the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee
 Opportunity Map).
 c. Variations to affordability requirements, including income-
 mixing, applicable rent schedules, United States
 Department of Housing and Urban Development Fair
 Market Rents paired with Housing Choice Vouchers,
 income averaging, etc.
 d. Enhanced tenant protections and replacement
 requirements for existing housing units on site, particularly
 in areas experiencing displacement pressures.
 3. INSTRUCT the DCP, as part of the development of the zoning
 tool, to prepare and present an Ordinance, in consultation with
 the City Attorney, to create new policies and processes that
 further important City objectives, including the following:
 a. Tailored regulations and mitigations for historic properties
 and areas with increased risk of environmental hazards.
 b. An advisory design consultation process through the Los
 Angeles City Planning Urban Design Studio.
 4. INSTRUCT the DCP to prepare reports with recommendations
 on the following:
 a. Recommendations in response to Motion (Martinez-Cedillo)
 in Council file No. 21-1045, adopted by the Council on
 February 8, 2022, relative to Senate Bill 9 and provisions
 for affordable housing and community land trusts, the
 development of a contextual “affordability bonus” in single-
 family residential zones, with incentives to increase
 ownership opportunities, including traditional and non-
 traditional (shared) ownership, (for example, higher income
 allowances, sale to nonprofits, land trust and cooperative




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 25
 incentives, simplified parcel map requirements, early start
 permits, etc.).
 b. Recommendations that create a local incentive program
 that requires increased affordability requirements in higher
 resource areas compared to current requirements, as part
 of the effort to update local affordable housing incentives
 (Density Bonus, Transit Oriented Communities, etc.) for
 mixed-income housing.
 c. Recommendations on the feasibility of developing
 additional subsidy sources to assist development of
 affordable housing that may utilize the zoning tool, including
 the following:
 i. A potential partnership with the Housing Authority of
 the City of Los Angeles that could provide assurance
 to affordable housing developers regarding the
 availability of rental subsidies (housing vouchers) to
 lower rents to deeper affordability levels, and to foster
 greater integration in higher resource areas.
 ii. Potential expansion of the California Property Tax
 Welfare Exemption through statewide legislation, as
 well as potential new revenue sources such as the
 real estate transfer tax funding measure being
 proposed for the November 2022 ballot, or a vacancy
 tax.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the CAO
 nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of
 this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For if Amended: Westside Neighborhood Council




(23) 22-0323
 CD 3 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to granting a non-
 exclusive permanent easement on a portion of Reseda Park to the
 Bureau of Engineering (BOE) for public right-of-way purposes at the
 northwest corner of Reseda Boulevard and Victory Boulevard.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 26
 ​Recommendations for Council action:

 1. GRANT a non-exclusive permanent easement (Easement) to the
 BOE for public right-of-way purposes, on a portion of Reseda
 Park, at the northwest corner of Reseda Boulevard and Victory
 Boulevard.
 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION that approves the
 granting of the Easement to BOE that is further detailed in the
 Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners (Board) report
 dated March 17, 2022, attached to the Council file.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that the recommendations
 above will not impact the Department of Recreation and Parks General
 Fund, as BOE will be responsible for all Project costs and all future
 costs within the easement area.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
 waived consideration of the above matter)

(24) 22-0913
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION, and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the issuance and
 sale of general obligation bonds, Series 2022-A, for Proposition HHH
 projects.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 9, 2022, relating to the issuance of Proposition HHH
 General Obligation Bonds and adding new Section 5.82.32 to
 Article 3.5 of Chapter 5 of Division 5 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code, for the creation of the related special funds.
 2. ADOPT the accompanying Authorizing RESOLUTION, attached
 to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated August 16,
 2022, providing for the issuance and sale of the General
 Obligation Bonds, Series 2022-A (Taxable) (Social Bonds) in an
 aggregate amount not to exceed $410 million for Proposition
 HHH Projects (Bonds).




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 27
 3. AUTHORIZE the CAO to receive and open bids on the published
 sale date and to award the Bonds to the bidder with the lowest
 true interest cost on behalf of the City as described in the Notice
 Inviting Bids for the Bonds.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no fiscal
 impact on the General Fund from approval of the
 recommendations. Principal and interest on the Bonds will be repaid
 from ad valorem taxes levied upon all of the taxable properties within
 the City.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies.
 The Debt Management Policy requires that the ratio of annual debt
 service payments on voter-approved and non voter-approved debt to
 general revenues be no more than 15 percent. The 2022-23 debt ratio
 is 4.44 percent. As the first debt service payment on the Bonds is
 expected to take place in 2023-24, there is no projected impact to the
 2022-23 debt ratio. After accounting for the issuance of the Bonds, the
 debt ratio is projected to increase to 4.53 percent in 2023-24.

 Debt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the issuance of the
 Bonds will result in estimated debt service payments that average
 $29.7 million annually over 20 years. The actual amount of debt
 service will be determined at the time of issuance subject to market
 conditions. The principal and interest on the Bonds will be paid from ad
 valorem taxes levied upon all of the taxable properties within the City.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(25) 22-0080
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF
 AGING relative to a request for authority to amend the contract for time
 extension with Everytable, and issue a request for proposal for the
 Senior Meal Program.
 (Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
 report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in
 Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 28
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

(26) 22-0756
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY and BUDGET AND FINANCE
 COMMITTEES REPORT relative to a proposed plan to close down
 and demobilize the City’s Project Roomkey Program; and emergency
 housing vouchers.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. APPROVE the Recommendations contained in the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated August 5, 2022,
 attached to Council file No. 22-0756.
 2. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Homeless Services
 Authority report dated August 4, 2022, attached to Council file
 No. 22-0756, and the Housing Authority of the City of Los
 Angeles report dated August 4, 2022, attached to Council file No.
 22-0756.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is a potential
 impact to the General Fund associated with the Reserve Fund
 appropriation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
 will reimburse jurisdictions for expenditures that are documented and
 are determined to be in support of quarantining or isolating individuals
 for COVID related medical reasons. As of July 1, 2022, FEMA will
 reimburse jurisdictions for 90 percent of expenditures that meet these
 requirements. If FEMA does not reimburse all expenses submitted for
 reimbursement, then the Reserve Fund appropriation may not be fully
 repaid.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 29
Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(27) 22-0002-S99
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST
 (CLA) and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position
 regarding Senate Bill (SB) 1425 (Stern/Hertzberg), which would
 require every city and county to review and update its local Open
 Space Plan by January 1, 2026.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Bonin –
 De Leon, et al.), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:

 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s
 2021 - 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 1425
 (Stern/Hertzberg), which would require every city and county to
 review and update its local Open Space Plan by January 1, 2026.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CLA. The City
 Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council

 (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee
 waived consideration of above matter)


(28) 20-0291
 RESOLUTION relative to the Declaration of Local Emergency by the
 Mayor, dated March 4, 2020, wherein he declared that conditions of
 disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have
 arisen both internationally and within the United States as a result of
 the introduction of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), pursuant to the
 provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section
 8.27.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to:




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 30
 a. Resolve that a local emergency continues to persist within the
 City of Los Angeles, within the meaning of Los Angeles
 Administrative Code Section 8.21, et seq., and the continuance
 of the Mayor’s March 4, 2020, Declaration of Local Emergency
 through 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution is therefore
 necessary.
 b. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all
 appropriate City departments, agencies and personnel shall
 continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent
 the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating
 the emergency and for the receipt, processing and coordination
 of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever
 State and Federal assistance that may become available to the
 citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency.
 c. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management
 Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need
 for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be
 required.
 d. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution to the
 Governor of the State of California, the Director of the California
 Office of Emergency Services, and the Los Angeles County
 Board of Supervisors.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted



Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 31
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code
of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which
the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 32

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Friday, August 26, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)

 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)

Roll Call

Members Present: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, O'Farrell, Price, Jr.,
Raman, Rodriguez and President Martinez (11); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson,
Krekorian (3)
Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 20-0602
 CDs 6, 11 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fifth Amendment to a
 contract with Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. to extend the term and
 increase contract authority for the migration of cameras to the existing
 video management system, for configuration of cameras installed
 under the capital improvement projects, and for ongoing maintenance,
 repair, and support services for the Closed Circuit Television Video
 Surveillance and Intelligent Observation Network of Los Angeles World
 Airports (LAWA) .




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 1
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport
 Commissioners (Board) that this action is exempt from the
 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE the Fifth Amendment to Contract DA-5212 with
 Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. to extend the term through
 July 31, 2023 and increase the contract authority by
 $6,413,030, for new total not to exceed $14,087,962, for
 migration of cameras to the existing video management system,
 for configuration of cameras installed under the capital
 improvement projects, and for ongoing maintenance, repair, and
 support services for the Closed Circuit Television Video
 Surveillance and Intelligent Observation Network of LAWA.
 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on June 2, 2022, by
 Resolution No. 27514, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer,
 or designee, of LAWA, to execute said Fifth Amendment to
 Contract DA-5212 with Integrated Security Solutions, Inc.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(2) 22-0833
 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM REPORT relative to approving the First Amendment to
 contracts with Kambrian Corporation and Zones LLC, covering
 purchase of software licenses, renewals, and support services for the




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 2
 Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA).

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Airport
 Commissioners (Board) that this action is exempt from the
 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article
 ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE the First Amendment to Contracts DA-5375 with
 Kambrian Corporation and DA-5376 with Zones LLC, to extend
 their respective terms by six months and increase their
 respective contract authorities by $4,250,600, for new total not
 to exceed $20,250,600 each, covering purchase of software
 licenses, renewals, and support services for LAWA.
 3. CONCUR with the Board’s action on June 2, 2022, by
 Resolution No. 27515, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer,
 or designee, LAWA, to execute said First Amendment to
 Contracts DA-5375 with Kambrian Corporation and DA-5376
 with Zones LLC.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 19, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 16, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(3) 22-0865
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION and TRADE, TRAVEL, AND
 TOURISM REPORT relative to approving Board Resolution No. 22-
 10004, which authorizes Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) Operating
 Agreement with DSV Air and Sea, Inc.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 3
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Harbor
 Commissioners (Board) that the proposed action is
 administratively exempt from the requirements of the California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), under Article ll, Section 2(f)
 of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
 2. APPROVE Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 22-10004
 authorizing proposed approval of FTZ Operating Agreement 22-
 9868 between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department and
 DSV Air and Sea, Inc.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 20, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(4) 22-0802
 TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM REPORT relative to the Port of Los
 Angeles (POLA) Fiscal Year 2022-23 Statement of Debt Accountability
 and Capital Improvement Plan.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 RECEIVE and FILE the POLA report dated July 1, 2022, relative to
 the Department’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Statement of Debt
 Accountability and Capital Improvement Plan.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 4
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(5) 22-0787
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the acceptance of
 the Fiscal Year 2020 (FY 20) Emergency Management Performance
 Grant (EMPG).

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:
 AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Emergency Management
 Department (EMD), or designee to:

 a. Retroactively apply for and accept the FY 20 EMPG in the
 amount of $640,259 from the Department of Homeland Security,
 Federal Emergency Management Agency for the period of July
 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022 to support emergency
 management salary expenses.
 b. Execute the subrecipient agreement, included as an attachment
 to the EMD report dated April 13, 2022, attached to Council file
 No. 22-0787, between the City and the County of Los Angeles,
 to receive grant funding in the amount of $640,259 for a term of
 July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022, subject to the approval of
 the City Attorney as to form.
 c. Identify spending up to the total grant amount of $640,259 in
 accordance with the grant award agreement and performance
 period.
 d. Submit grant reimbursement requests to the County of Los
 Angeles and deposit the grant receipts into the General Fund,
 Department No. 35, Revenue Source Code No. 3684, Other
 Federal Grants.




 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO)




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 5
 reports that acceptance of the FY 20 EMPG in the amount of
 $640,259 is necessary to realize anticipated General Fund grant
 receipts assumed in the Adopted Budget for the 2022-2023 Fiscal
 Year.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations provided in this report are in compliance with the
 City's Financial Policies in that one-time grant funding will be utilized
 for grant-eligible program expenditures to support emergency
 preparedness initiatives.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(6) 22-0733
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Supplemental
 Police Account (SPA) First Quarterly Report - January through March
 2022.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the SPA First Quarterly Report, attached to the Board of
 Police Commissioners (BPC) report dated June 16, 2022, attached to
 Council file No. 22-0733.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the BPC. Neither the
 City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has
 completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(7) 22-0743




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 6
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation valued
 at $85,000 to be used for psychology services for the Los Angeles Fire
 Department (LAFD) from the LAFD Foundation.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. APPROVE the acceptance of a donation valued at $85,000 to
 be used for psychology services for the LAFD from the LAFD
 Foundation; and, THANK the donor for this generous donation.
 2. AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, LAFD, or designee, to negotiate
 and execute any agreements necessary to effectuate the City's
 acceptance and deployment of the donated supplemental
 services.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Fire Commissioners reports
 the there is no fiscal impact to the LAFD’s budget from the
 acceptance of this donation. Donations provide the necessary items
 meeting the needs of the respective fire stations or administration
 sections. Replacement or repair of items meeting City specifications
 and LAFD business needs may be borne by General Fund, subject to
 budgetary constraints.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(8) 22-0841
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation of two
 commercial-grade washers and dryers valued at $8,858 to the Los
 Angeles Fire Department (LAFD Fire Station 61) from the First-In Fire
 Foundation.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the acceptance of a donation of two commercial-grade
 washers and dryers, valued at $8,858 to Fire Station 61 from the
 First-In Fire Foundation; and, THANK the donor for this generous
 donation.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 7
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Fire Commissioners reports
 the there is no fiscal impact to the LAFD’s budget from the
 acceptance of this donation. Donations provide the necessary items
 meeting the needs of the respective fire stations or administration
 sections. Replacement or repair of items meeting City specifications
 and LAFD business needs may be borne by General Fund, subject to
 budgetary constraints.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(9) 22-0786
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a donation valued
 at $138,300, to be used for the Los Angeles Police Department’s
 (LAPD) Air Support Division’s Electronic Flight Instrument System
 upgrade kit from the Air Support Angels Foundation.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the acceptance of a donation valued at $138,300, to be
 used for the LAPD's Air Support Division's Electronic Flight
 Instrument System upgrade kit from the Air Support Angels
 Foundation; and, THANK the donor for this generous donation.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board of Police
 Commissioners. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief
 Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(10) 22-0282




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 8
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2021 Connect
 and Protect Law Enforcement Behavioral Health Response Program
 (Connect and Protect) application.




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police
 Department (LAPD), or designee, to retroactively apply for,
 negotiate, and accept a grant award of $550,000 relative to the
 2021 Connect and Protect: Law Enforcement Behavioral Health
 Response Program (Connect and Protect) from the Bureau of
 Justice Assistance (BJA) within the United States Department of
 Justice, for a three-year term that began on October 1, 2021,
 through September 30, 2024, and execute any documents or
 agreements necessary to accept the grant funds, subject to the
 approval by the City Attorney as to form.
 2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to deposit the 2021 Connect and
 Protect grant funds, received under this cooperative agreement,
 into the Police Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, account
 number to be determined.
 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish a grant receivable and
 appropriate up to $550,000 within the Police Department Grant
 Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, for
 disbursement of the BJA 2021 Connect and Protect grant funds.
 4. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, LAPD, or designee, to
 negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with
 Justice & Security Strategies, Inc., a subrecipient agency, for a
 term within the applicable grant performance period, for a sum
 not to exceed $150,000, for the provision of grant research
 partner services, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as
 to form.
 5. TRANSFER $100,000 from the Police Department Grant Fund
 No. 339/70, account number to be determined to Fund No.
 100/70, Account No. 001092, Overtime Sworn.
 6. TRANSFER the 2021 Connect and Protect grant funds from
 Fund No. 339/70, Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police
 Grants Related Costs, for fringe benefits and related costs upon
 submission of proper documentation by LAPD, subject to City
 Administrative Officer (CAO) approval of the related costs
 incurred during the grant performance period.
 7. INSTRUCT the LAPD to reprogram a portion of the 2021
 Connect and Protect grant funds to reflect eligible related cost
 reimbursements for the use of sworn overtime.




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 10
 8. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for
 any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor
 and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to
 retroactively accept the 2021 Connect and Protect grant award of up
 to $550,000 from the United States Department of Justice, BJA, for a
 three year term that began on October 1, 2021 through September
 30, 2024. Acceptance of this award requires the City to provide a
 grant match of $195,602 over the three year term. Funding for the
 City match requirement, which includes partial salaries and related
 costs for one Sergeant II and one Detective III, is provided through
 existing budgeted funds within the LAPD budget. There is no
 additional impact on the General Fund. The grant reimbursements for
 related costs will deposited into Revenue Source Code No. 5349,
 Police Grants Related Costs.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that, to the extent possible, current operations will be
 funded by current revenues.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(11) 22-0417
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2021
 Collaborative Approaches Towards Preventing and Addressing Hate
 Crime Program (Hate Crime) application.

 ​Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police
 Department (LAPD), or designee, to retroactively apply for,




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 11
 negotiate, and accept a grant award of $833,333 relative to the
 2021 Hate Crime grant program from the Bureau of Justice
 Assistance (BJA) within the United States Department of
 Justice, for a three-year term that began on October 1, 2021,
 through September 30, 2024, and execute any documents or
 agreements necessary to accept the grant funds, subject to the
 approval by the City Attorney as to form.
 2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to deposit the 2021 Hate Crime grant
 funds, received under this cooperative agreement, into the
 Police Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, account number to
 be determined.
 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to establish a grant receivable and
 appropriate up to $833,333 within the Police Department Grant
 Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, for
 disbursement of the BJA 2021 Hate Crime grant funds.
 4. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, LAPD, or designee, to
 negotiate and execute a Professional Services Agreement with
 Justice & Security Strategies, Inc., a subrecipient agency, for a
 term within the applicable grant performance period, for a sum
 not to exceed $229,208, for the provision of grant research
 partner services, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as
 to form.
 5. TRANSFER $206,250 from the Police Department Grant Fund
 No. 339/70, account number to be determined to the following
 accounts:
 a. $163,750 to Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001092,
 Overtime Sworn.
 b. $42,500 to Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001090,
 Overtime Civilian.
 6. TRANSFER the 2021 Hate Crime grant funds from Fund
 339/70, Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police Grants Related
 Costs, for fringe benefits and related costs upon submission of
 proper documentation by LAPD, subject to City Administrative
 Officer (CAO) approval of the related costs incurred during the
 grant performance period.
 7. INSTRUCT the LAPD to reprogram a portion of grant funds to
 reflect related cost reimbursements in support of the sworn and
 civilian overtime salaries.




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 12
 8. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for
 any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor
 and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to
 retroactively accept the 2021 Hate Crime grant award of up to
 $833,333 from the United States Department of Justice, BJA, for a
 three year term beginning on October 1, 2021 through September 30,
 2024. There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of these
 recommendations. No matching funds are required for this grant.
 Reimbursements are expected to increase by $27,740 and will be
 deposited into Revenue Source Code No. 5349 Police Grants Related
 Costs for the Fiscal Year 2022-23 and 2023-24.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized to fund grant activities.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(12) 20-1590
 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the 2020
 Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Capacity Enhancement and Backlog
 Reduction (CEBR) Program Grant.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to
 transfer funds totaling $441,564 within the 2020 DNA CEBR
 Program Grant, approved by the United States Department of
 Justice, Office of Justice Programs.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 13
 2. TRANSFER $153,317 from the Police Department Fund No.
 100/70, Account No. 001090, Overtime General to the Police
 Department Grant Fund No. 339/70, Account No. 70T502, 2020
 DNA CEBR Program.
 3. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to reprogram a portion of the 2020 DNA
 CEBR Program Grant funds to pursue eligible related cost
 reimbursements for the use of civilian overtime and transfer the
 2020 DNA CEBR Program Grant funds from Fund No. 339/70,
 Revenue Source Code No. 5349, Police Grant Related Costs,
 for fringe benefits and related costs upon submission of proper
 documentation by LAPD, subject to City Administrative Officer
 (CAO) approval of the related costs incurred during the grant
 performance period.
 4. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for
 any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor
 and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the CAO; and,
 AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the
 recommendations stated in this report will allow the LAPD to
 reprogram $441,564 in grant funds from the 2020 DNA CEBR
 Program for the purchase of additional DNA reagent kits and
 equipment. There is no City match required under the grant terms.
 There is no additional impact on the General Fund.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations stated in this report comply with the City’s Financial
 Policies in that, to the extent possible, current operations will be
 funded by current revenues.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




Adopted Item
Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
(3)




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 14
(13) 22-0889
 CD 6 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a refund claim
 filed by Pacific Bell Telephone for a Utility Permit located at 7956 North
 Lankershim Boulevard.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 APPROVE the Claim for Refund, Reference No. 3210, for Utility
 Permit U-1981-3594, in the amount of $104,119.59, to the claimant
 Pacific Bell Telephone.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board of Public Works reports that
 funds for Claim for Refund in the amount of $104,119.59 for the
 Claimant, Pacific Bell Telephone, is available in the Street Damage
 Restoration Fee Spec, Fund No. 41A/50, Department Revenue
 Source No. 428601 for $103,844.60; General Fund, Fund No. 100/86,
 Department Revenue Source No. 329301 for $257; and the BOE
 Equip and Training Trust, Fund No. 568/50 Department Revenue
 Source No. 435601 for $17.99.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(14) 15-0411-S1
 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Bridge
 Improvement Program – Seismic Bond Total Budget (BIP Seismic
 Budget) new baseline program budget.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. APPROVE BIP Seismic Budget of $463 million, as the new
 baseline program budget.
 2. INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to report annually with a
 revised BIP Seismic Budget.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 15
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Seismic Governance Committee reports
 that there is no additional General Fund impact beyond monies
 authorized for this purpose as part of the 2022-23 Adopted City
 Budget.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(15) 22-0846
 CD 10 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a contract with
 Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI) to design and construct an
 illuminated cultural gateway at the intersection of Normandie Avenue
 and Olympic Boulevard.

 Recommendation for Council action:

 AUTHORIZE the President, Board of Public Works, or two members,
 to execute the proposed contract with LANI to design and construct
 an illuminated cultural gateway at the intersection of Normandie
 Avenue and Olympic Boulevard for a total term of four years and a
 total amount of $3,630,933.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO)
 reports that there is no General Fund impact. Approval of the
 proposed contract will result in the expenditure of $3,630,933 in City
 special funds. Sufficient funds exist to support the proposed contract.
 Maintenance costs will be incorporated into the annual City budget.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the proposed
 contract complies with the City Financial Policies as sufficient funds
 exist to support this expenditure.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 23, 2022




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 16
 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 23, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(16) 22-0860
 CD 1 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to issuing a
 revocable permit to allow the property owner at 4344 Eagle Rock
 Boulevard to close, gate, occupy, demolish, excavate, and commence
 construction of permanent structures within the existing public right-of-
 way prior to the recordation of the Final Tract Map.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo –
 Harris-Dawson):
 INSTRUCT the Bureau of Engineering to issue a revocable permit,
 subject to satisfaction of the conditions for issuing such permit, to
 allow the property owner at 4344 Eagle Rock Boulevard to close,
 gate, occupy, demolish, excavate, and commence construction of
 permanent structures within the existing public right-of-way prior to
 the recordation of Final Tract Map No. 74750-SL.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor
 the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(17) 22-0696
 CD 5 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to initiating consideration of a proposed General Plan
 Amendment (GPA), Zone and Height District Change Ordinance, and
 environmental clearance, to amend the Exposition Corridor Transit
 Neighborhood Specific Plan (Ordinance No. 186402) for the property
 located at 8905 Venice Boulevard.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 17
 Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Koretz –
 Harris-Dawson):

 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP), to prepare
 a GPA, Zone and Height District Change Ordinance, and
 environmental clearance, for the property located at 8905
 Venice Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90034; and, thereby
 initiate consideration of a GPA to the Community Commercial
 land use designation, and accompanying Zone and Height
 District Change to the Commercial Zone (C2), Height District 3.
 2. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City Attorney, to
 prepare and present an Ordinance to amend the Exposition
 Corridor Transit Neighborhood Specific Plan (Ordinance No.
 186402), for the proposed commercial development which
 exceeds the Specific Plan's Floor Area Ratio and height
 limitations, for said property located at 8905 Venice Boulevard.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor
 the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(18) 12-0460-S6
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to a First Amended and Restated Agreement to Contract No.
 C-122418 with Code Studio, Inc. to increase compensation, extend the
 term, and expand the scope of work; for the continued provision of
 consulting services relative to a complete rewrite and simplification of
 the City’s Zoning Code.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the Director of Planning, Department of City Planning,
 or designee, to execute the proposed First Amended and Restated
 Agreement to Contract No. C-122418 with Code Studio, Inc. to




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 18
 increase compensation by $225,000, for a total compensation
 amount of $5,263,000; extend the contract term for six months, for a
 revised term from June 25, 2013 to December 25, 2022; and, expand
 the Scope of Work to include the drafting of zoning districts and tools
 needed to support additional Community Plan Updates, in substantial
 conformance with the draft Amended and Restated Agreement
 attached to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May
 31, 2022, attached to the Council file, subject to the review and
 approval of the City Attorney as to form and compliance with the
 City’s contracting requirements.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to
 the General Fund. Funding will be provided by the Long-Range
 Planning Fund No. 52F.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommended
 action complies with the City’s Financial Policies in that the proposed
 Agreement will be supported by special funds.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - SEPTEMBER 5, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - SEPTEMBER 2, 2022)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(19) 22-0502
 CD 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the properties
 located at 1900-1914 West 8th Street and 805-807 South Bonnie Brae
 Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 19
 Article 19, Section 15332 (Class 32), and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning
 (DCP) as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
 Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and
 THEREBY SUSTAIN the Director of Planning’s determination in
 approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental
 clearance for a proposed Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities
 (TOC) Affordable Housing project involving the demolition of two
 existing one-story commercial buildings and surface parking
 areas for the construction, use, and maintenance of a new
 seven-story, approximately 85 feet-high mixed-use building with
 64 residential units, and approximately 1,000 square feet of
 commercial space on the ground floor; seven of the proposed
 residential units will be set aside for Extremely Low Income
 household occupancy for a period of 55 years to satisfy the
 TOC program requirements; the proposed building will
 encompass approximately 50,216 square feet in total building
 area, resulting in a Floor Area Ratio of approximately 3.6:1; the
 project proposes to provide 34 automobile parking spaces on
 the ground floor, including 32 residential vehicle parking spaces
 and two commercial vehicle parking spaces; and, will also
 provide 53 long-term bicycle parking spaces and eight short-
 term bicycle parking spaces; for the properties located at 1900-
 1914 West 8th Street and 805-807 South Bonnie Brae Street.

 Applicant: Troy White, West 8th & Bonnie Brae, LLC
 Representative: Jonathan Yang, Irvine & Associates, Inc.
 Case No. DIR-2021-8104-TOC-VHCA
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-8105-CE-1A

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed
 a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 20
 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(20) 22-0485
 CD 10 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a
 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the
 property located at 950- 962 ½ South Berendo Street.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Section 15332, Article 19 (Class 32), and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning
 (DCP) as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez,
 Coalition for an Equitable Westlake Macarthur Park, and
 THEREBY SUSTAIN the Director of Planning’s determination in
 approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental
 clearance for a proposed Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities
 Affordable Housing project involving the construction of a new
 77-unit apartment building on one parcel comprised of one lot;
 the building is proposed to be 92 feet, 4 inches (at its highest
 point), built to eight stories and one roof deck; with 33 studio
 units, 31 one-bedroom units, and 13 two-bedroom units; eight of
 the units will be set aside for Extremely Low Income household
 occupancy for a period of 55 years; the project proposes one
 level of at-grade parking and one level of subterranean parking
 containing 39 automobile parking spaces, 60 long-term bicycle
 spaces, and five short-term bicycle spaces; for the property
 located at 950- 962 ½ South Berendo Street.

 Applicant: Fred Shaffer, Berendo Los Angeles Apartments, LLC
 Representative: Dana Sayles/Sara Houghton, three6ixty
 Case No. DIR-2021-9706-TOC-HCA




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 21
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-9707-CE

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City
 Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed
 a financial analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(21) 22-0816
 CD 12 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE
 MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California
 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Appeal filed for the property located
 at 9450 North Shirley Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the
 project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines,
 Section 15332, Article 19, Class 32, and there is no substantial
 evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical
 exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2
 applies.
 2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the North Valley Area Planning
 Commission (NVAPC) as the Findings of Council.
 3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Supporters Alliance
 for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), and THEREBY
 SUSTAIN the determination of the NVAPC in approving a
 Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a
 project involving the construction of a new 309,169 square-foot,
 five-story, 350-unit multi-family residential building, and a new
 six-level, 466-stall above-grade automobile parking garage; for
 the property located at 9450 North Shirley Avenue.

 Applicant: James Varsamis, GGP Northridge Fashion Center, LP
 Representative: Josh Guyer, Burns & Bouchard, Inc.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 22
 Case No. DIR-2021-7970-SPR-VHCA-1A
 Environmental No. ENV-2021-7971-CE

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The NVAPC reports that there is no General
 Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(22) 21-0972
 PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 relative to options for an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) in
 the City, considerations for the development of incentive programs for
 100 percent affordable housing projects, and related matters.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 23
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP), in
 consultation with the City Attorney, to prepare and present an
 Ordinance with tailored incentives in different contexts, as well
 as ministerial approval, for 100 percent affordable housing
 projects that meet objective criteria, including the following:
 a. For projects located on land already zoned for multi-family
 housing (at least five units), expand upon and exceed
 existing affordable housing incentives, including
 consideration of form-based density limits, an expanded
 menu of incentives (floor area, height, parking,
 commercial or ground-floor requirements, etc.), and
 ministerial approval of defined waivers or modifications.
 Focus these efforts particularly in commercial (C) zones,
 transit areas, and on corridors.
 b. Develop unique zoning incentive strategies to more easily
 allow 100 percent affordable housing on publicly-owned
 land [Public Facilities Zones (PF), Parking Zones (P and
 PB), land owned or leased by faith-based institutions, and
 certain industrial- zoned (M) land located on corridors
 when consistent with General Plan Policies].
 c. For projects located in lower density multi-family
 residential zones (R2 and RD zones that allow less than
 five units) that do not currently qualify for affordable
 housing incentives, allow contextual modifications to
 existing zoning regulations, including modestly increased
 development envelopes (height/floor area ratio) with
 density limits to promote a mix of housing types and
 deviations from standards such as building separation,
 passageway, parking, and setbacks.
 2. INSTRUCT the DCP, with the assistance of the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO), to identify funding for contractual
 services to prepare an economic feasibility study and
 stakeholder engagement process, further analyze the following
 issues in order to maximize production of affordable housing
 using the zoning tool described above, particularly in higher
 resource areas, and to affirmatively further fair housing,
 including the following:
 a. Variations in the level of incentives and development
 standards in higher resource areas, as well as based on
 proximity to transit, activity centers, and major corridors.




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 24
 b. Potential non-applicability in High-Segregation and
 Poverty Areas (per the California Tax Credit Allocation
 Committee Opportunity Map).
 c. Variations to affordability requirements, including income-
 mixing, applicable rent schedules, United States
 Department of Housing and Urban Development Fair
 Market Rents paired with Housing Choice Vouchers,
 income averaging, etc.
 d. Enhanced tenant protections and replacement
 requirements for existing housing units on site, particularly
 in areas experiencing displacement pressures.
 3. INSTRUCT the DCP, as part of the development of the zoning
 tool, to prepare and present an Ordinance, in consultation with
 the City Attorney, to create new policies and processes that
 further important City objectives, including the following:
 a. Tailored regulations and mitigations for historic properties
 and areas with increased risk of environmental hazards.
 b. An advisory design consultation process through the Los
 Angeles City Planning Urban Design Studio.
 4. INSTRUCT the DCP to prepare reports with recommendations
 on the following:
 a. Recommendations in response to Motion (Martinez-
 Cedillo) in Council file No. 21-1045, adopted by the
 Council on February 8, 2022, relative to Senate Bill 9 and
 provisions for affordable housing and community land
 trusts, the development of a contextual “affordability
 bonus” in single-family residential zones, with incentives
 to increase ownership opportunities, including traditional
 and non-traditional (shared) ownership, (for example,
 higher income allowances, sale to nonprofits, land trust
 and cooperative incentives, simplified parcel map
 requirements, early start permits, etc.).
 b. Recommendations that create a local incentive program
 that requires increased affordability requirements in higher
 resource areas compared to current requirements, as part
 of the effort to update local affordable housing incentives
 (Density Bonus, Transit Oriented Communities, etc.) for
 mixed-income housing.




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 25
 c. Recommendations on the feasibility of developing
 additional subsidy sources to assist development of
 affordable housing that may utilize the zoning tool,
 including the following:
 i. A potential partnership with the Housing Authority of
 the City of Los Angeles that could provide assurance
 to affordable housing developers regarding the
 availability of rental subsidies (housing vouchers) to
 lower rents to deeper affordability levels, and to
 foster greater integration in higher resource areas.
 ii. Potential expansion of the California Property Tax
 Welfare Exemption through statewide legislation, as
 well as potential new revenue sources such as the
 real estate transfer tax funding measure being
 proposed for the November 2022 ballot, or a
 vacancy tax.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the
 CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial
 analysis of this report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For if Amended: Westside Neighborhood Council

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price, Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-
 Dawson (2)

(23) 22-0323
 CD 3 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to granting a non-
 exclusive permanent easement on a portion of Reseda Park to the
 Bureau of Engineering (BOE) for public right-of-way purposes at the
 northwest corner of Reseda Boulevard and Victory Boulevard.

 ​Recommendations for Council action:

 1. GRANT a non-exclusive permanent easement (Easement) to
 the BOE for public right-of-way purposes, on a portion of
 Reseda Park, at the northwest corner of Reseda Boulevard and




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 26
 Victory Boulevard.
 2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION that approves the
 granting of the Easement to BOE that is further detailed in the
 Board of Recreation and Park Commissioners (Board) report
 dated March 17, 2022, attached to the Council file.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that  the
 recommendations above will not impact the Department of Recreation
 and Parks General Fund, as BOE will be responsible for all Project
 costs and all future costs within the easement area.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
 waived consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(24) 22-0913
 BUDGET AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT, RESOLUTION, and
 ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the issuance and
 sale of general obligation bonds, Series 2022-A, for Proposition HHH
 projects.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated
 August 9, 2022, relating to the issuance of Proposition HHH
 General Obligation Bonds and adding new Section 5.82.32 to
 Article 3.5 of Chapter 5 of Division 5 of the Los Angeles
 Administrative Code, for the creation of the related special
 funds.
 2. ADOPT the accompanying Authorizing RESOLUTION, attached
 to the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated August 16,
 2022, providing for the issuance and sale of the General




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 27
 Obligation Bonds, Series 2022-A (Taxable) (Social Bonds) in an
 aggregate amount not to exceed $410 million for Proposition
 HHH Projects (Bonds).
 3. AUTHORIZE the CAO to receive and open bids on the
 published sale date and to award the Bonds to the bidder with
 the lowest true interest cost on behalf of the City as described in
 the Notice Inviting Bids for the Bonds.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no fiscal
 impact on the General Fund from approval of the
 recommendations. Principal and interest on the Bonds will be repaid
 from ad valorem taxes levied upon all of the taxable properties within
 the City.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies.
 The Debt Management Policy requires that the ratio of annual debt
 service payments on voter-approved and non voter-approved debt to
 general revenues be no more than 15 percent. The 2022-23 debt ratio
 is 4.44 percent. As the first debt service payment on the Bonds is
 expected to take place in 2023-24, there is no projected impact to the
 2022-23 debt ratio. After accounting for the issuance of the Bonds, the
 debt ratio is projected to increase to 4.53 percent in 2023-24.

 Debt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that the issuance of the
 Bonds will result in estimated debt service payments that average
 $29.7 million annually over 20 years. The actual amount of debt
 service will be determined at the time of issuance subject to market
 conditions. The principal and interest on the Bonds will be paid from
 ad valorem taxes levied upon all of the taxable properties within the
 City.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

Adopted Item
Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
(3)

Adopted to Reconsider Item




Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 28
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price, Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-
 Dawson (2)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price, Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-
 Dawson (2)

(25) 22-0080
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF
 AGING relative to a request for authority to amend the contract for time
 extension with Everytable, and issue a request for proposal for the
 Senior Meal Program.
 (Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee
 report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in
 Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.)
 (Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

 Adopted Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee Report
 Forthwith - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)

(26) 22-0756
 HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY and BUDGET AND FINANCE
 COMMITTEES REPORT relative to a proposed plan to close down
 and demobilize the City’s Project Roomkey Program; and emergency
 housing vouchers.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 29
 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL
 OF THE MAYOR:

 1. APPROVE the Recommendations contained in the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated August 5, 2022,
 attached to Council file No. 22-0756.
 2. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Homeless Services
 Authority report dated August 4, 2022, attached to Council file
 No. 22-0756, and the Housing Authority of the City of Los
 Angeles report dated August 4, 2022, attached to Council file
 No. 22-0756.



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is a potential
 impact to the General Fund associated with the Reserve Fund
 appropriation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
 will reimburse jurisdictions for expenditures that are documented and
 are determined to be in support of quarantining or isolating individuals
 for COVID related medical reasons. As of July 1, 2022, FEMA will
 reimburse jurisdictions for 90 percent of expenditures that meet these
 requirements. If FEMA does not reimburse all expenses submitted for
 reimbursement, then the Reserve Fund appropriation may not be fully
 repaid.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the
 recommendations comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item as Amended by Motion (de León – O’Farrell) - SEE ATTACHED
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price,
 Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian
 (3)



Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(27) 22-0002-S99
 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST
 (CLA) and RESOLUTION relative to establishing the City's position




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 30
 regarding Senate Bill (SB) 1425 (Stern/Hertzberg), which would
 require every city and county to review and update its local Open
 Space Plan by January 1, 2026.

 Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Bonin –
 De Leon, et al.), SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE
 MAYOR:

 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s
 2021 - 2022 State Legislative Program, SUPPORT for SB 1425
 (Stern/Hertzberg), which would require every city and county to
 review and update its local Open Space Plan by January 1, 2026.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CLA. The City
 Administrative Officer has not completed a financial analysis of this
 report.

 Community Impact Statement: Yes
 For:
 Westside Neighborhood Council

 (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee
 waived consideration of above matter)

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price, Jr., Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-
 Dawson (2)

(28) 20-0291
 RESOLUTION relative to the Declaration of Local Emergency by the
 Mayor, dated March 4, 2020, wherein he declared that conditions of
 disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property have
 arisen both internationally and within the United States as a result of
 the introduction of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), pursuant to the
 provisions of the Los Angeles Administrative Code (LAAC) Section
 8.27.




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 31
 Recommendation for Council action:

 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to:

 a. Resolve that a local emergency continues to persist within the
 City of Los Angeles, within the meaning of Los Angeles
 Administrative Code Section 8.21, et seq., and the continuance
 of the Mayor’s March 4, 2020, Declaration of Local Emergency
 through 30 days from the adoption of this Resolution is
 therefore necessary.
 b. Direct, in accordance with the LAAC, Section 8.21 et seq., all
 appropriate City departments, agencies and personnel shall
 continue to perform all duties and responsibilities to represent
 the City of Los Angeles in this matter for the purpose of abating
 the emergency and for the receipt, processing and coordination
 of all inquiries and requirements necessary to obtain whatever
 State and Federal assistance that may become available to the
 citizens of Los Angeles who may be affected by the emergency.
 c. Instruct the General Manager, Emergency Management
 Department, to advise the Mayor and City Council on the need
 for extension of this Declaration of Local Emergency as may be
 required.
 d. Instruct the City Clerk to forward copies of this Resolution to the
 Governor of the State of California, the Director of the California
 Office of Emergency Services, and the Los Angeles County
 Board of Supervisors.



 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 Adopted Item
 Ayes: Blumenfield, Bonin, Cedillo, de León, Koretz, Martinez, O'Farrell, Price, Jr.,
 Raman, Rodriguez (10); Nays: Lee (1); Absent: Buscaino, Harris-Dawson,
 Krekorian (3)



Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral - SEE ATTACHED




 Friday - August 26, 2022 - PAGE 32
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Koretz Blumenfield Raymond P. Ciranna
Cedillo de León Costa Rican Day
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Koretz – Blumenfield All Councilmembers Barbara Blinderman
Lee All Councilmembers Captain Warren S.
 Weinstein
 Council file No. 22-0080

COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND
NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE relative to a request for authority to amend the contract for
time extension with Everytable, and issue a request for proposal for the Senior Meal Program.

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Aging (Aging), or
 designee, to:

 a. Allocate funding as outlined in the August 4, 2022 Aging report, attached to the
 Council file.

 b. Execute an amendment to Agreement No. C-140102 with Everytable, as
 detailed in Attachment 1 of the August 4, 2022 Aging report, attached to the
 Council file, to extend the current contract term from June 30, 2022 through
 December 31, 2022, subject to review by the City Attorney as to form.

 c. Issue a Request for Proposals in accordance with City Procurement Policy and
 Charter Section 1022 requirements (as applicable), subject to the approval of
 the City Attorney as to form, to establish a list of qualified vendors to support the
 City's efforts at ensuring the provision of emergency meals and related services
 to older adults residing in the City.

 d. Provide unilaterally additional funds, on as-needed monthly basis, from the $6
 million Senior Emergency Meals General Funds allocation to the Everytable
 contract to ensure the continuation of services until the procurement is
 completed and approved by City Council and the Mayor.

 e. Set aside $250,000 from the $6 million Senior Meals General Funds allocation
 to develop and implement a pilot Dine-In Meal program for participants at two
 congregate meal sites that would allow older adults to purchase two meals per
 week at pre-approved local restaurants and food venues.

 f. Prepare additional Controller's instructions and any necessary technical
 adjustments that are consistent with the Mayor and Council actions on this
 matter, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), and
 authorize the City Controller to implement those instructions.
 2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:

 a. Disburse funds upon submission of proper demand form the General Manager,
 or designee.

 b. TRANSFER $6 million funds from the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 Unappropriated
 Balance Fund No. 100/58, Account No. 580394, Senior Nutrition Services to
 Aging Fund No. 100 as follows:

 i. $37,710 to Fund No. 100/02, Account No. 001010, Salaries General

 ii. $360,768 to Fund No. 100/02, Account No. 001070, Salaries as needed

 iii. $35,287 to Fund No. 100/02, Account No. 001090, Salaries overtime

 iv. $5,537,817 to Fund No. 100/02, Account No. 003040, Contractual
 services

 v. $28,418 to Fund No. 100/02, Account No. 006010, Office & Admin Exp

 c. Authorize the early reversion of the liquidated encumbrances of $4,827,613.75
 from the FY 21-22 Aging, Fund No 100/02, Account 003040, contractual
 services in July 2022, and revert the disencumbered amount to the Reserve
 Fund No. 101, and subsequently transfer to the Unappropriated Balance, and
 appropriate therefrom to the FY 22-23 Aging, Fund No. 100/02, Account
 003040, Contractual Services for the Senior Meals Emergency response
 Program.

 d. Authorize  a transfer of $612,457.75 from the Reserve fund to the
 Unappropriated Balance, and there from to the Aging, Fund 100/02, Account
 003040, Contractual Services for the Senior Meals Emergency response
 program.

Fiscal Impact Statement: Aging reports that the proposed action involves allocations from the
FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget Unappropriated Balance. There is no additional
impact to the General Fund.

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

(Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of above matter)
Summary:

On August 23, 2022, your Committee considered the August 12, 2022 communication from
Aging relative to a request for authority to amend the contract for time extension with
Everytable, and a request for proposal for the Senior Meal Program. The report attached to
the Council file includes some background on the matter.

After providing an opportunity for public comment, the Committee Chair moved to approve the
recommendations reflected above. This matter is now forwarded to the Council for its
consideration.

Respectfully Submitted,

ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE




MEMBER VOTE
LEE: YES
BONIN: ABSENT




EV 22-0080_rpt_aphen_08-23-22


 -NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL COUNCIL ACTS-
 TO CITY CLER.1< FOR PLACEMENT ON NEXT #51
 REGUlAR COUNCIL AGEtIDA TO BE POSiED


 MOTION


 Traffic violations and reckless driving endanger drivers, pedestrians, and vulnerable
populations that may share the roads or sidewalks. In the past two-year period, Council District 3
has incurred 270 collisions that have resulted in severe injuries. Forty of those incidents further
resulted in the loss of life, devastating families in our community. The Los Angeles Police
Department's (LAPD) Valley Traffic Division has been able to provide focused attention to areas
in high need of traffic enforcement through strategic planning.
 One of the LAPD's primary tools to reduce collisions has been enforcement and education
to modify poor driving behaviors. Targeted enforcement and education efforts in the Third Council
District have focused on primary collision factors, as well as the quality-of-life issues related to
loud modified exhausts, street racing, and street takeovers. The existing volume of calls for service
related to traffic collisions have depleted the availability of traffic enforcement personnel available
for enforcement and education duties. Additional funding is needed for overtime to allow officers
to conduct the necessary enforcement and education duties to reduce poor driving behaviors that
lead to collisions.
 I THEREFORE MOVE that $100,000 from the Council District 3 portion of the
"Neighborhood Service Enhancements" line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100-56,
be transferred I appropriated to the Police Fund No. 100-70, Account No. 001092 (Sworn
Overtime), for supplemental traffic safety measures in Council District 3.
 I FURTHER MOVE that Police Department be authorized to make any corrections,
clarifications, or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including any new instructions,
in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any corrections and changes to fund
or account numbers; said corrections I clarifications I changes may be made orally, electronically
or by any other means.




  ~UG 2 8 2022
 ~b-
 MOTION
 RULES, ELECTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS

The Los Angeles City Council suspended Councilmember Mark Ridley-Thomas on October 20, 2021,
after the U.S. Attorney's Office filed a multiple-count felony indictment on October 13, 2021 . Council
took this action pursuant to Charter Section 211 (titled "Suspension Pending Trial") in a properly
noticed special meeting and after public comment, consistent with the Brown Act. The suspension
created a temporary vacancy in the office of Council District 10. The vacancy is temporary because
Mr. Ridley-Thomas would be el igible to resume his elected duties if he is acquitted or the charges
against him are dismissed.

After the suspension, the Council President named Mr. Ridley-Thomas's chief of staff as the caretaker
for Council District 1O to manage the day-to-day affairs of the District. A caretaker may not, however,
act as a voting member of the Council. Therefore, in February, the Council appointed Mr. Herb
Wesson to serve as a voting member of the Council, providing direct representation to the residents of
Council District 10. As a result of recent court rulings, however, District 10 residents are once again
left without direct representation on the Council.

Following the court's ruling, Ms. Heather Hutt was named as the caretaker for Council District 10. Ms.
Hutt has a long career of public service and has previously served as the State Director for then-
Senator Kamala Harris - the first Black State Director in California's history - and as District Director
for former State Senator Isadore Hall. Ms. Hutt is born and raised in Council District 10 and meets all
other Charter requirements to serve as the voting member of Council District 10. Given the
uncertainty of when and how Mr. Ridley-Thomas's trial is to be resolved, the Council should now
appoint someone to hold the office of Council District 10 as a voting member to directly represent the
constituents of Council District 10.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council appoint Heather Hutt to hold the office of Council District 10
unless Mr. Ridley-Thomas is acquitted or the charges against him are dismissed, whichever comes
first.



PRESENTED BY:




SECONDED BY:
 ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCAI IUN, & NttbhbUKnuuLi
 MOTION

On the first day of the 2022-23 school year earlier this month, more than 60,000 students were
absent. The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) has suffered vast declining enrollment for
years, exacerbated by the pandemic. Student enrollment is one of several indicators that reflect the
need to provide greater ease of access to additional services and resources to address the needs of
youth outside of the classroom. Concurrently, we must evaluate which services and programs are
being used by young people across the City, so that we can better prepare and inform our City's
budgetary priorities.

As the Youth Development Department (YDD) carries forward with a Strategic Plan towards
auditing youth programs and services offered through the City's departments, the City should take an
inventory of access to these programs and services. Currently, a singular system that connects youth
services citywide does not exist. A central user interface for youth to access programs and services,
would provide greater accessibility, remove siloed department operations, and provide data that assist
us in developing programs that are responsive to the user needs.

We ;ve seen the value of single user interface in other citywide efforts, through reformed business
platforms as Los Angeles Business Ass.istance Virtual Network (LABA VN), or its successor
platform Los Angeles Regional Alliance Marketplace for Procurement (RAMP), there needs to be a
single user interface built off a secure system that can provide this accessibility and accountability .
This system would serve as a streamlined path to City services, while also increasing youth
participation across all city programming efforts. This work would establish internal relationships for
the City to allow youth to access all services through a card, for the Los Angeles Public Library
(LAPL), Department of Transportation (LAD OT) DASH, or Depa11ment of Recreations & Parks
(RAP) programming.

I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instructs the YDD, with assistance from the
Information Technology Agency (ITA), and all city departments and offices including the Mayor's
Office that have youth programming and services, to report in 90 days on recommendations for
establishing a platform or single user interface system to connect all departments when it comes to
youth related services and programming.

I FURTHER MOVE that the City Administrative Officer (CAO) identity funding for a platform or .. ~



single user interface system for youth related services and programming.
 HOUSING
 MOTION

 The City of Los Angeles created the Basic Income Guaranteed: Los Angeles Economic
Assistance Pilot (BIG:LEAP) program in 2021 as one of the largest guaranteed income
demonstration projects in the United States. In January 2022, after extensive planning with the
Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD) and a robust application process,
BIG:LEAP began dispersing unconditional, regular, and direct cash payments of $1,000 per
month for 12 months to roughly 3,200 of Los Angeles' highest need families. Guaranteed Basic
Income (GBI) programs are founded upon the philosophy that people enduring financial
instability or poverty are best positioned to make informed financial decisions that efficiently
address their household's needs. Innovative programs like BIG:LEAP provide the City an
opportunity to support Angelenos in need, while informing future policy and programs for the
City at-large.

 On July 25, 2022, the California Department of Social Services (CDSS) released a
Request for Application (RFA) for a State Guaranteed Income Pilot Program. The state's
application scoring process will be preferential toward applicants that focus their eligibility
criteria on youth aging out of foster care and/or pregnant California residents. Currently, the City
provides support services to these populations through programs such as the Domestic Violence
and Human Trafficking emergency shelters and transitional housing. In addition, Angelenos
accessing these services have additional barriers to regaining financial stability. Through this
grant opportunity from the State, the City has an opportunity to expand resources and support for
survivors and add to the body of research regarding the impact of guaranteed income. With
wrap-around supportive services, such as housing, case management and financial counseling,
guaranteed income has the potential of significantly changing the trajectory of a survivor's life,
and the future of their children.

 The Community Investment for Families Department (CIFD) has identified the CDSS
grant as a valuable source of funding to support the City's mandate to alleviate family and
childhood poverty in the City by 2035 (CF #22-0041). The State Guaranteed Income Pilot
Program allows applicants to apply for up to $5 million; for the preparation, adoption, and
implementation.for a project duration of 3 years, and requires a 50% local match. Applications to
the State Guaranteed Income Pilot Program are due to CDSS by September 6, 2022.

 I THEREFORE MOVE, that the City Council authorize the General Manager of CIFD,
or their designee, to apply and accept a grant in an amount up to $5,000,000 under the State
Guaranteed Income Pilot Program through the California Department of Social Services, and to
negotiate, execute, and submit the new grant agreement with CDSS, including all certifications
and other required documents.
 I FURTHER MOVE that the Council instruct the City Administrative Officer to identify
funding in the amount of $1.5M in FY 2023-2024 and $1M in FY 2024-2025 to support the
local, required match.

 I FURTHER MOVE that CIFD report back upon notice of the award to present the grant
agreement and provide details on program design, staffing needs, Controller's instructions, and
other relevant information for review and approval.



 •
 PRESENTED BY:~'  ~ND. PRICE, JR.
 Councilmember, 9th District
 MOTION
 PLANNING &LAND USE MANAGEMENT
 The City adopted the Mills Act Historical Property Contract Program in 1996 (Ordinance No. 171413),
Council File No. 94-0644. The program is administered by the Planning Department, and provides financial
incentives to further the City's historic preservation goals and objectives. Property tax savings are directed to the
preservation, rehabilitation and maintenance of historic properties.

 The Mills Act is available to property owners of designated as Historic-Cultural Monuments (HCMs) and/or
are Contributors to a Historic Preservation Overlay Zone. The Mills Act is a contract between the City and a
property owner that allows for a potential reduction in property taxes with the obligation that the property
owner will invest funds for restoration, rehabilitation, and maintenance of the property. The Cultural Heritage
Commission reviews and approves applications for properties valued above the program limits and Mills Act
contracts are approved by the Council. The contract obligates an owner to complete necessary work and comply
with property maintenance requirements.

 There are currently 951 Mills Act contracts with property owners Citywide, and a limited number of staff
that are able to ensure that individual properties are in compliance with their contracts. The Planning Department
is currently exploring ways in which to enhance contract compliance while also ensuring the financial viability and
equitable distribution of the Mills Act benefits into the future.

 Failure of a Mills Act property owner to preserve, rehabilitate and maintain their historic property
is not only a violation of the contract but a misappropriation of property tax dollars that could be allocated
to greater community purposes. The misuse of the Mills Act is even more egregious when activity at the property
is counter to the purpose of the program to demonstrate the best practices in historic preservation and property
maintenance.

 While the Planning Department works on updating the Mills Act program, there are two Mills Act properties
in Council District No. 13 that appear to be in violation of the terms of their contracts that need to be investigated.
The properties are: (1) the Little Country Church of Hollywood (HCM #567), located at 1750 N. Argyle Avenue
and; (2) the Jardinette Apartments (HCM #390), located at 5128 Marathon Street, both located in Hollywood.

 The primary church building on the Little Country Church ofHollywood property was destroyed by fire in
2007. However, the historic gardens remain and are in a deteriorated state. The Department of Building and Safety
has investigated the site over the years for conditions that seemingly are in violation of their Mills Act contract. In
addition, the Police Department has reported that the site is routinely broken into and have responded to
multiple calls for service. The Jardinette Apartments, designed by master architect Richard Neutra, is a vacant 4-
story apartment building, subject to the Rent Stabilization Ordinance. It has significantly deteriorated and has active
code enforcement for unpennitted construction work which is seemingly in violation of their Mills Act contract.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the Council instruct the Planning Department and the Department of Building
and Safety, with the assistance of the City Attorney, and Police Department, to prepare a report with
recommendations in 30 days on the existing condition of the following two Mills Act historical contract
properties that appear to be in violation of the terms of' their contracts: (1) the Little Country Church of
Hollywood (HCM #567), located at 1750 N . Argyle Avenue, and (2) the Jardinette Apartments (HCM #390),
located at 5128 Marathon Street, and whether or not the Mills Act contract obligations for these two properties
are being met; and if not, the enforcement or termination actions the City can take to ensure that the properties
..-e being preserved and maintained in accordance with the terms of the Mills Act Historical ~ .· .· ·'-"fl')
Program (Ordinance No. 171413). .

 PRESENTED BY:~~ , ·
 MITC OtFARRELL
 z ·
 RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules,
regulations, or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state, or federal governmental body
or agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with the
concurrence of the Mayor; and

WHEREAS, California is in the midst of a housing crisis in which more than 50% of renters-
including 80% oflow-income renters-are paying more than 30% of their income toward housing,
and the median price of a single-family home exceeds $800,000; and

WHEREAS, nearly 160,000 people in California experience homelessness on any given night
according to the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness; and

WHEREAS, there are many reasons housing production has not kept pace with demand, including
a very speculative market and high land costs, insufficient land zoned for multi-family housing,
lengthy and costly entitlement processes, and the lack of sufficient and ongoing funding streams
dedicated to solving California's housing and homelessness crisis; and

WHEREAS, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) recently
released the 2022 Statewide Housing Plan, which estimates that California needs to build
approximately 2.5 million units of housing over the next eight years, with no less than 1 million
units affordable to lower income households; and

WHEREAS, according to HCD, California will need 180,000 new units of housing each year just
to keep up with existing demand, including 80,000 units affordable to lower-income households,
yet the State averages less than 100,00 units per year and has never produced more than 20,000
new affordable homes in any year, all while the State's housing market is one of the most
competitive in the entire country; and

WHEREAS, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale metropolitan region remains the nation's least
affordable major housing market for the seventh consecutive quarter; and

WHEREAS, according to a recently published study by the UC Berkeley Labor Center, pay and
health coverage among California's construction workers is so poor that nearly 50% of this
workforce has to rely on the State's five largest safety net programs at an annual cost of over $3
billion; and
WHEREAS, the State has an acute shortage of construction workers, with tight labor markets in
nearly every region and a workforce training pipeline that has not kept pace with rising demand;
and

WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2011 (AB 2011) would create the Affordable Housing and High Road
Jobs Act of 2022, which would allow climate-friendly affordable housing to be built by right in
eligible infill areas currently zoned for office, retail, and parking uses, as well as along commercial
corridors, as long as projects meet significant and specified affordability, labor, and environmental
commitments while also growing a thriving and well-paid construction workforce; and

WHEREAS, AB 2011 would allow 100% affordable housing anywhere in these areas that is not
adjacent to industrial land or on environmentally sensitive land, and mixed-income housing will
be focused along commercial corridors that are wide enough to accommodate density and new
transit; and

WHEREAS, AB 2011 would require eligible sites to include either 8% of units for very low
income households and 5% of units for extremely low income households, or, at least 15% of units
affordable to low-income households; and

WHEREAS, AB 2011 would require developers seeking to build eligible projects to meet a range
of responsible wage and training standards, including prevailing wage, health benefits for workers
on projects of 50 or more units, and a requirement that all contractors must either participate in a
state-approved apprenticeship program or request the dispatch of apprentices from a program;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by adoption
of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State Legislative
Program SUPPORT for Assembly Bill 2011 (Wicks), the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs
Act of 2022, which will help address the City's housing crisis while creating middle-class jobs.



PRESENTED BY:
 \~
 Councilmember, 4th District
 JllKEBONIN
 Councilmember, 11th District




SECONDED BY:




 AUG 2 6 2022
 ?AbP
 MOTION
 RULES, ELECTIONS &INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIGi>

Since July 19, 2022, the seat of the 10th Council District has been held by a caretaker without voting
authority. The residents of the 10th District of the City of Los Angeles deserve full representation on the
Los Angeles City Council, including a voting member. The City Council should thoroughly, transparently
and expeditiously explore fill options to make sure they have that representation. Before considering or
voting on any potential appointments to fill the seat, the City Council needs a detailed, public discussion
of the full range of available scenarios.

I THEREFORE MOVE that Council instruct City Attorney to make a public report to the entire City
Council on eligibility requirements, as outlined by the Los Angeles City Charter, for potential
appointments by the City Council to fill the temporary vacancy in Council District 10 in 60 days.

I FURTHER MOVE that the Council instruct City Attorney, City Clerk, and the Chief Legislative Analyst
to report on steps that would need to be taken, associated costs, and the legality of a special election
a11owing voters of the 10th District to fil1 the temporary vacancy.

I FURTHER MOVE that the Council instruct the Chief Legislative Analyst to report on a process for
selecting a voting representative for Council District l 0 that includes public input from constituents and
civic institutions of the District.



PRESENTED BY: \:>~
 MARQUEECE HARRIS DAWSON
 - .  MIKE BONIN
 Councilmember, 8th District Councilmember, 11th District e.iiiim•




 Councilmember, 7th Dist ·
 MOTION TRANSPORTATION
 Beginning in 2010 and over the past decade, the City has approved land use entitlements for the
development of apartments on property located at 10951-10955 Wilshire Boulevard and 1151-1157
Gayley Avenue in the Westwood community, known as the Wilshire Gayley project, with strong
support from residents and businesses. The project has been pursuing building, grading, shoring, and
other permits from LAD BS since 2018, and has nearly completed clearances required to pull permits
and begin construction.

 The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is currently building
the Purple (D Line) Extension Transit Project, including construction in Council District 5, along
Wilshire Boulevard in Westwood. The construction involves lane closures and other traffic control
measures, and is impacting and will continue to impact residents and businesses in Council District 5
for many years. Metro has requested cooperation and priority processing from the City for its project
requests.

 The Purple Line Extension project includes the proposed Westwood/UCLA station, with a
station portal structure located on UCLA-owned property directly adjacent to the Wilshire Gayley
property. Because funding for Metro projects comes from public sources, Metro's consideration of the
impacts of the Purple Line Extension project on communities, businesses, and other stakeholders,
including previously approved projects in the City of Los Angeles, is critically important.

 The Wilshire Gayley project was initially approved before the Purple Line Extension project, as
set forth in Vesting Tentative Map No. 70935 and the vesting zone change adopted in 2010 as
Ordinance No. 181487. Metro recognized the existence of the Wilshire Gayley project in the EIR/EIS
for the Purple Line Extension project, which Metro certified in 2012.

 Wilshire Gayley and Metro have been working cooperatively on traffic control and
construction management to ensure that disruption to residents and businesses in the Westwood area is
minimized. However, even though the Wilshire Gayley project was approved first, Metro has asserted
that the City must not issue Wilshire Gayley's construction permits until the project conducts certain
technical analysis due'to its adJacen"cy to Metro's planned Westwood/UCLA station.

 As a result of ci1sputes'1>ver the e'Xtent of Metro's authority to compel the City not to approve
permits for a project orfprivate property, and Metro's continued position that LADBS should not issue
permits, Metro and Wilshire Gayley agreed to hire a third-party consultant to conduct the technical
analysis requested by Metro.

 In early 2022, after obtaining information and plans for the Wilshire Gayley project and the
Westwood/UCLA station, a third-party consultant conducted the analysis. During this time, Wilshire
Gayley determined that Metro may have designed the structure of the Westwood/UCLA station
without taking the future Wilshire Gayley project into account.

 Now that an additional year of delay has occurred to complete the third-party analysis, Metro
now claims that the analysis is insufficient and still insists that the City should not issue permits for the
Wilshire Gayley project. In addition, Metro has asserted that the developer must sue the City and
Metro to resolve the matter; when the developer sought judicial relief against Metro, Metro filed a
motion insisting that the City must be brought into the case because the permits Metro has refused to
clear are City permits.



A~ -
 Metro has the capability and responsibility to conduct its own analysis and make any necessary
refinements to its Westwood/UCLA station design to ensure its construction and operation meets all
public safety requirements. As the Wilshire Gayley project was approved first, this analysis and any
appropriate design responses should be the responsibility of Metro as a public agency using public
funds, and not of a private project, and Metro should conduct such analysis without asking the City to
further delay the completion of the permitting process for the Wilshire Gayley project.

 Metro's continued refusal to allow the Wilshire Gayley project to proceed threatens this
important, long-planned and approved project, which has a Vesting Tentative Map that is set to expire
in July 2023. This would result in a substantial loss to the City, including additional tax revenues, job
and housing opportunities for residents, and the support ofa future economic resurgence in Westwood
Village.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the Department of Building and Safety
to remove the requirement that Metro issue clearances for the Wilshire Gayley project's construction
permits because the project was approved prior to the Purple Line Extension, and has conducted
technical analysis and provided plans and other project information to Metro to enable Metro to assess
and determine whether any modifications to the design of the Westwood/UCLA station are necessary
to account for the project.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City refrain from imposing any additional permitting
requirements on the Wilshire Gayley project related to the presence of the Metro station adjacent to the
Wilshire Gayley property.




 e.J. u
 ,I




 PRESENTEDBY:
 PAULKOR TZ
 Councilmember, 5th District




 2
 KULb, tlt~ IION~, IN IENGUVEkNMtN IAL ktLA 1llJN...
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules,
regulations, or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state, or federal governmental body or
agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with the concurrence
of the Mayor; and

 WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Government's 2024-2050 Regional
Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (Connect SoCal 2024) calls for the reduction or
elimination of parking requirements in order to realize potential construction costs savings ranging from
$20,000 for surface parking, $50,000 for garages and structures, and $80,000 per space for underground
spaces; and

 WHEREAS, Policy 4.13 of Los Angeles' Mobility Plan 2035 calls for the City to balance on-
and off- street parking supply with other transportation and land use objectives by reducing the
overabundance of free parking to promote vibrant public spaces, encourage transit ridership, and
disincentivize automobile trips; and

 WHEREAS, Program PK.13 of Los Angeles' Mobility Plan 2035 directs the City to reduce
parking requirements for developments that are located near transit or a major bus stop and provide
facilities to enable pedestrian, bicycle and disabled access; and

 WHEREAS, Program 21 of Los Angeles' Housing Element (2021-2029) directs the City to
promote innovative parking and mobility strategies such as developing alternatives to current parking
standards, establishing new options for parking minimums, or instituting parking maximums in
transit-served areas; and

 WHEREAS, Program 131 of Los Angeles' Housing Element (2021-2029) directs the City to
advance the Livable Communities Initiative to holistically plan for housing, mobility and sustainability, in
order to transform transit-rich corridors through rezoning and public investments that deprioritize
automobiles and promote local, multi-modal infrastructure to provide safe, livable, and dignified space in
the public realm; and

 WHEREAS, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association's 2010 report,
"Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures," demonstrates a significant reduction in vehicle
miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions through the elimination or reduction of parking minimums,
the creation of parking maximums, and the provision of shared parking; and

 WHEREAS, empirical research demonstrates that guaranteed free or low-cost parking at the
beginning and end of the most frequent commutes greatly encourages automobile use even for short, local
trips that are best served by walking, rolling, or transit; and




~ nr.
.... .,, 2 6 2322
 ~


-Jn, ~
. u'
 WHEREAS, according to a study from the United States Government Accountability Office
 (GA0-18-637), urban projects that include parking structures were associated with a per-unit cost
 increase of approximately $56,000; and

 WHEREAS, mandatory parking standards have led to an oversupply of parking spaces and
 inefficient land use practices that encourage a reliance upon single occupancy automobiles, discourage
 multi-modal travel, increase greenhouse gas emissions and traffic congestion, curtail the production of
 housing, and drives higher housing costs; and

 WHEREAS, AB 2097 would prohibit a public agency from imposing or enforcing any minimum
 automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project that is
 located within one-half mile of public transit; and

 WHEREAS, AB 2097 would authorize the City of Los Angeles to impose or enforce minimum
 automobile parking requirements on a project if the City makes written findings, within 30 days of the
 receipt of a completed application; and

 WHEREAS, AB 2097 would create an exception from the above-described provision if the
 project: 1) dedicates a minimum of 20% of the total number of housing units to very low, low, or
 moderate income households, students, the elderly, or persons with disabilities, 2) contains fewer than 20
 housing units, or 3) is subject to parking reductions based on the provisions of any other applicable law;
 and

 WHEREAS, AB 2097 will further the City of Los Angeles' goals to promote more equitable and
 affordable housing production and promote more healthy, livable, sustainable, and resilient communities
 that improve the lives of all Angelenos;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by
 adoption of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State Legislative
 Program SUPPORT for Assembly Bill 2097, which would prohibit a public agency from imposing or
 enforcing any minimum automobile parking requirement on a residential, commercial, or other
 development project ifthe project is located within one-half mile of public transit.



 PRESENTEDBY: ~ _

 MIKE BONIN
 Councilmember, 11th District



 SECONDED BY:


 Councilmember, 4th District
 0
 ··~.