HR Committee — Burlington, VT
Date: 2025-02-03
Time: 14:00

Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington,
 VT

2 pm, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT OR Remotely via ZOOM:
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/94820907375?pwd=ZWdzWk5KTGp5K29vZ1dEd2dLaU9jQT09
Meeting ID: 948 2090 7375
Passcode: 616429



1. Adopt Agenda

2. Approve Minutes
  Subject 2.1. Approve Minutes from 12.02.24 Meeting
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT
  Category 2. Approve Minutes
  Department Human Resources


  Type

3. Public Forum

4. Policy Review
  Subject 4.1. Burlington Police Department Press Releases
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 4. Policy Review

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

  Subject 4.2. Review newly created ADA Interactive Process policy
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 4. Policy Review

  Department Human Resources


  Type
  Recommended Action

5. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update
  Subject 5.1. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 5. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

6. Executive Session - Tentative
  Subject 6.1. Amendment to compensation policies
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 6. Executive Session - Tentative

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

7. Other Committee Business

8. Adjournment
  Subject 8.1. Motion to adjourn
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 8. Adjournment

  Department Council and Board


  Type

  Recommended Action

9. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements
  The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious
  affiliation, race, color, national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity,
  marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City
  is also committed to providing proper access to services, facilities and employment opportunities. The programs
  and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who require special
  arrangements, auxiliary aid, service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to
  participate in a program, service, or activity of the City of Burlington, should contact the office of the Title II
  Burlington ADA Coordinator at 802-865-7000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled
  event.

Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington,
 VT

2 pm, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT OR Remotely via ZOOM:
Please click the link below to join the webinar:
Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/94820907375?pwd=ZWdzWk5KTGp5K29vZ1dEd2dLaU9jQT09
Meeting ID: 948 2090 7375
Passcode: 616429



1. Adopt Agenda

2. Approve Minutes
  Subject 2.1. Approve Minutes from 12.02.24 Meeting
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT
  Category 2. Approve Minutes
  Department Human Resources


  Type

3. Public Forum

4. Policy Review
  Subject 4.1. Burlington Police Department Press Releases
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 4. Policy Review

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

  Subject 4.2. Review newly created ADA Interactive Process policy
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 4. Policy Review

  Department Human Resources


  Type




 Page 1 of 20
  Recommended Action

5. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update
  Subject 5.1. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 5. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

6. Executive Session - Tentative
  Subject 6.1. Amendment to compensation policies
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 6. Executive Session - Tentative

  Department Human Resources


  Type

  Recommended Action

7. Other Committee Business

8. Adjournment
  Subject 8.1. Motion to adjourn
  Meeting February 3, 2025 - HRPC 02/03/2025 - Monday, February 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR
 Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT


  Category 8. Adjournment

  Department Council and Board


  Type

  Recommended Action

9. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements
  The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious
  affiliation, race, color, national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity,
  marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City
  is also committed to providing proper access to services, facilities and employment opportunities. The programs
  and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who require special
  arrangements, auxiliary aid, service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to
  participate in a program, service, or activity of the City of Burlington, should contact the office of the Title II
  Burlington ADA Coordinator at 802-865-7000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled
  event.



 Page 2 of 20
Page 3 of 20
 Monday, December 2, 2024, 2:00 PM, Kieslich Cottage, 311 North Ave., Burlington, VT


 2 pm, Conference Room at Kieslich Cottage, 311 North Ave., Burlington, VT OR Remotely
 via ZOOM: Please click the link below to join the webinar:
 Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/94820907375?pwd=ZWdzWk5KTGp5K29vZ1dEd2dLaU9jQT09
 Meeting ID: 948 2090 7375
 Passcode: 616429
Present:
Councilor Sarah Carpenter, Chair (SC)
Councilor Marek Broderick (MB)
Councilor Evan Litwin (EL)

Others in Attendance:
Lynn Reagan, HR Acting Director (LR)
Meaghan Diffenderfer, HR Administrative Coordinator
Annie

Sarah calls meeting to order at 2:04 pm

 1. Adopt Agenda
 MB moves to adopt the agenda.
 EL seconds the motion.
 All in favor, motion so moved and adopted.

 2. Accept Minutes

 EL moves to accept the minutes as written.
 MB seconds the motion.
 All in favor, motion so moved and accepted.


 2. Public Forum
 none

 3. Department Head 360 Evaluations Update

 LR presents update on Department Head 360 Evaluations. She has met with the Mayor and finalized the
 document – not much different than what was shared with the committee at the last meeting. She will be
 meeting with the Chief and Deputy Chief of staffs next week to start assigning each department head with
 a rater (as of now, a combination of direct reports, peer department head, and city councilors). The
 survey itself is already set up in draft form on survey monkey. It is estimated it will take between 11-15
 minutes to complete. The hope is to roll it out in the beginning of the new year. Each recipient will have
 between 2-3 weeks to have the evaluations completed, and all data will come back to the HR department.
 HR will collect it and make sure anonymity is maintained, and will present the data to the mayor end of
 February / early March. The Mayor will use the data to determine any necessary trainings that should be
 completed by the department heads and utilize it as one tool of many in regards to reappointments. Her
 hope is to give at least 2 months’ notice to any department head who won’t be reappointed.

 SC asks for further details on how city councilors will be involved?



 Page41ofof20
 Page 5
 LR clarifies it is to include any city councilor who may have relationship with department heads, such as
 those who sit on department boards or commissions.

 SC asks for the final draft of the survey to be sent – LR confirms she can send out the survey monkey link
 so councilors can see the survey as it will be presented to those completing it.

 MB wants to be sure that the councilors selected have enough experience with the department head that
 the review is worthwhile (i.e. there is an actual, meaningful working relationship) and remains
 anonymous.

 4. Modern Gov Update

LR gives an update on the Modern Gov initiative. She clarifies she is not part of the leadership team that is
working alongside the Mayor to work on the Modern Gov project. There has been no impacts yet that have
trickled down to the departments. It is still in a discussion phase between the Mayor and selected individuals.

SC asks for clarification on how HR as a department and HRPC may be involved.

LR clarified there could be merging of departments and roles which could lead to a reassignment of a role. The
PPM would be followed, and HR and HRPC may be asked to provide input using the tools we have, including the
policies laid out in union contracts. Conversations with the Mayor and Chief of Staff continue and this is being
discussed, and LR is reminding them of these guiding documents that we have to consider and adhere to while
decisions are being made.

EL asks about how this coincides with the FY26 budgeting timeline.

LR explains the budgeting process is happening earlier this year, and notes that Modern Gov will not be a
single fiscal year project. Changes made in FY26 will likely be smaller than changes down the line.

EL asks about if it comes to reassigning work vs. layoffs, will it represent cost savings or will salaries be
maintained at their current rates if an employee changes positions?

LR shares that it depends, and we would have to review the contracts since a voluntary transfer vs. involuntary
transfer do have different paths, at least in the AFSCME contract. The next steps are not known at this point in
time. There has been no discussion of layoffs, and the mayor’s office is doing everything they can to maintain
the city budget.

 5. Vacant Department Head Searches

 SC opens the discussion by sharing the Director of Planning role has been filled and there is an active search
 for the Chief of Police.

 LR adds on that Charles Dillard (an internal candidate) was hired into the Director of Planning role. Initially
 the Mayor planned to post the Director of HR once the Director of planning position was filled; that has been
 placed on hold and LR will continue to act as Interim Director while focus shifts to Chief Of Police. Most likely
 an outside recruiter will be hired for that search, and the hiring and search team will involve members of the
 police department and commission in addition to HR.

 EL encourages a survey to be sent to councilors or something of the sort to be taken into account to ensure
 that there isn’t a standstill in terms of approving the new Chief.



 Page52ofof20
 Page 5
 MB suggests going to both caucuses asking for a discussion, so feedback on what is being sought by
 councilors can be taken into consideration.

 LR shares that Christian Berry has been promoted to be the Interim Director of REIB after Phet, the previous
 Director, resigned.

 SC asks if they will they be filling any additional roles in that department.

 LR is unsure at this time

 SC asks if the same recruitment process for the Chief of Police will be used for the Deputy Chief of Police.

 LR: We are actively recruiting for those roles now and hoping that there will be crossover with the current
 Deputy Chief.

 EL wants to be sure whatever outside recruiting agency that is selected has a plan for how to outreach to
 diverse groups to find candidates.

 LR has not heard a launch date of when the recruitment process will start but imagines it will be sooner rather
 than later. We were given a last possible employment date, but the Chief has been clear that if another
 opportunity arises he may leave earlier than that date.

 EL asks the committee to be kept updated if the these roles are filled or any changes in process, even via
 email if it’s between meetings.

 6. Other Committee Business

LR reports that the PPM is moving in the right direction. It has been handed it off to the City Attorney’s office
for review. There are scheduled meetings every 2 weeks to check in with them. The goal of completion is still
spring – March 2025. While it still might come up over the next few meetings, the goal is to make a summary
sheet of any policies that have been touched or changed. There is work on the City’s ADA policy with the
Attorney’s office to formalize our process.

SC asks if that policy will go through the Accessibility Committee.

LR says the plan is to pass it along, but that committee does mostly focus on external relations. She also is
asking that it gets approved and put out sooner than the complete PPM manual.

SC notes that she did ask that each department appoint someone to serve on the accessibility committee.

Next Meeting planning: Break in January, meet in February. February 3 rd – 2:30 pm. Tentatively March 17,
2:30 pm. Both meetings will be back at 200 Church or via Zoom.

 7. Adjournment

Meeting adjourned, 2:45 pm.


 9. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements



 Page63ofof20
 Page 5
The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political or religious
affiliation, race, color, national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity,
marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive status, crime victim status or genetic information. The City
is also committed to providing proper access to services, facilities and employment opportunities. The programs
and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who require special
arrangements, auxiliary aid, service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to
participate in a program, service, or activity of the City of Burlington, should contact the office of the Title II
Burlington ADA Coordinator at 802-865-7000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled
event




 Page74ofof20
 Page 5
 Page85ofof20
Page 5
Page 9 of 20
Page 10 of 20
Page 11 of 20
Page 12 of 20
Page 13 of 20
Page 14 of 20
Page 15 of 20
Page 16 of 20
Page 17 of 20
 Interactive Process Policy

This policy describes the process by which the City will address requests for reasonable
accommodations for disabilities. This policy will apply to current employees, applicants, and
those to whom a job offer has been extended but whose service has not yet commenced. In the
case of an applicant or individual whose employment is pending, it is understood that the process
will look different than in the case of a current employee insofar as the timeline for decision-
making may limit discussions and information gathering.

What is a Disability?

The term “disability” means,

 (A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life
 activities of such individual;

 (B) a record of such an impairment; or

 (C) being regarded as having such an impairment.

This definition is from 42 U.S.C. § 12102, which contains additional relevant definitions. HR
should consult with the City Attorney’s Office in deciding what constitutes a disability. Note that
substance abuse disorder is a disability to the extent that the individual is receiving treatment for
the disorder and is not currently using a substance. For more information, refer to the Americans
with Disabilities Act.

What Is a Reasonable Accommodation for a Disability?

A reasonable accommodation includes any of the following:

 (1) A modification or adjustment to a job application process to enable a qualified applicant
 with a disability to be considered for the position.
 (2) Modifications or adjustments to the work environment, or to the manner or circumstances
 under which the position held or desired is customarily performed, to enable a qualified
 individual with a disability to perform the essential functions of that position.
 (3) Modifications or adjustments that enable employees with disabilities to enjoy equal
 benefits and privileges of employment as similarly situated employees.

A modification or adjustment is not considered a reasonable accommodation if it will cause undue
hardship for the City as the employer. Undue hardship may take four forms:

 (1) Even with the modification or adjustment, the employee (or applicant or pending
 employee) still will not be able to do the essential functions of the job. An essential
 function is a core duty or competency. Each position in the City has enumerated duties
 and competencies associated with that position, but not every duty or competency is core.
 It would be a reasonable accommodation to excuse an employee from a non-core duty or
 competency because of a disability. However, core duties and competencies cut directly
 to the reason the job exists. For example, an employee hired to do manual labor cannot be

 1


 Page 18 of 20
 excused from performing all manual tasks because of a disability. That would undercut
 the reasons the position exists.
 (2) The modification or adjustment would enable the employee to perform essential functions
 of the job, but would impose a cost that is excessive relative to all available resources.
 (3) Allowing the modification or adjustment poses a “direct threat” to the health or safety of
 the employee or others. Determination of a direct threat requires substantial evidence that
 the threat is significant, actual, and currently existing.

What Are Some Examples of Potentially Reasonable Accommodations?1

 (1) Job restructuring, typically through reassigning tasks within a department.
 (2) Allowing an employee to take advantage of protected leave or leave provided as an
 employee benefit.
 (3) Modification of work from home policies.
 (4) Modified workplace policies (e.g., allowing an insulin-dependent employee to eat at desk
 even if otherwise not allowed).
 (5) Use of a service animal. For more information, please see:
 https://www.ada.gov/resources/service-animals-2010-requirements/.
 (6) Modified or part-time schedule, which may affect the employee’s compensation subject
 to personnel rules and/or a collective bargaining agreement. This option is not preferred
 but should be considered where the employee requests it or the alternative is dismissal.
 (7) Reassignment to another position for which the employee is qualified, which may affect
 the employee’s compensation subject to personnel rules and/or a collective bargaining
 agreement. This option is not preferred but should be considered where the employee
 requests it or the alternative is dismissal.
How Will the City Be Informed of the Need for a Reasonable Accommodation?

 (1) The need for the accommodation may be obvious.
 (2) The employee may request the accommodation orally or in writing. The employee does
 not need to use the magic words, “I need to request an accommodation”. All that is required
 is that the employee make clear the need for a modification or adjustment based on a
 disability. “I need a more comfortable chair” is not an example of a request for a reasonable
 accommodation, but “I need a more comfortable chair because I have a back problem” is.
 (3) Someone may also request the accommodation on behalf of the employee, such as a doctor
 or a spouse.2

What Information Can the City Require?

The City needs to verify that the employee has a disability, and the City needs to know how the
disability affects the employee’s ability to do their job. If the employee’s needs are clear, then the
City should not request further information. A discussion with the employee may also satisfy this
purpose. Where more information is necessary, the City should request reasonable documentation.

1 These may not necessarily be reasonable in all circumstances. Refer to factors in previous
section.
2 The receipt of a request from a third party does not, in itself, authorize staff to continue to

communicate with the third party rather than the employee.

 2


 Page 19 of 20
Where appropriate, this should include medical records, but the City may not require the employee
to provide more documentation than is reasonably necessary to establish the existence of the
disability and its effect on the employee’s ability to perform job functions. The employee is free
to provide more information than requested.

How Will a Reasonable Accommodation Be Selected?

If the employee proposes an accommodation that appears reasonable on its face, then the
accommodation shall be implemented with no further process. If the accommodation is not
reasonable on its face, one or more meetings shall be noticed in writing in which the employee, a
representative of HR, a supervisor if appropriate, an attorney in the City’s Attorney Office if
appropriate, and appropriate representatives of the employee shall participate. The meeting or
meetings should be recorded with the employee’s informed consent.

The goal of the meeting or meetings will be to brainstorm possible accommodations and to
consider whether any proposed accommodation is reasonable. Any agreed upon solution should
be documented in an informal writing. No accommodation should be rejected unless the employee
refuses it or unless the reasons it is not reasonable are supported by substantial evidence and
documented in writing. The City has the burden of explaining why an accommodation is not
reasonable.

Experts may be consulted as appropriate during the process, and the City should request
clarification whenever appropriate. The employee is expected to participate fully in the process
and to respond to reasonable requests for information or clarification in a timely manner.
Reasonable accommodations may be appropriate to help the employee participate and respond.

How Will Privacy Be Maintained?

All medical records, written requests for an accommodation, or records of the deliberative process
shall be kept in the employee’s medical personnel file and shall be available only to HR personnel,
supervisors on a need-to-know basis, attorneys in the City Attorney’s Office on a need-to-know
basis, the employee, other public agencies when requested pursuant to applicable law for
investigatory or legal compliance purposes, or otherwise when legally required.

What Happens If a Reasonable Accommodation Cannot Be Identified?

An employee may be terminated, subject to applicable law if:

 (1) The employee cannot perform essential job functions because of a disability, and
 (2) A reasonable accommodation was not identified through the interactive process or the
 employee refused a reasonable accommodation that would enable the employee to perform
 essential job functions.




 3


 Page 20 of 20

Human Resources Policy Committee Meeting
 Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, 2:00 PM, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT

 2 pm, HR Conference Room, 200 Church St., Burlington, VT OR Remotely via
 ZOOM: Please click the link below to join the webinar:
 Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/94820907375?pwd=ZWdzWk5KTGp5K29vZ1dEd2dLaU9jQT09
 Meeting ID: 948 2090 7375
 Passcode: 616429



Present:
Councilor Sarah Carpenter, Chair (SC)
Councilor Marek Broderick (MB)
Councilor Evan Litwin (EL)

Other in Attendance:
Lynn Reagan, HR Acting Director (LR)
Erin Jacobsen, Chief of Staff (EJ)
Meaghan Diffenderfer, HR Administrative Coordinator

Meeting called to order, 2:07 pm by Chair Carter

 1. Adopt Agenda

MB moves to adopt the agenda without the tentative executive session
EL seconds
All in favor, motion so moved and adopted


 2. Approve Minutes
MB moves to approve the minutes from the 12/2/24 meeting as written
EL Seconds
All in favor, motion so moved and approved



 3. Public Forum

None.

 4. Policy Review
 Subject 4.1. Burlington Police Department Press Releases
SC invited Chief of Staff Jacobsen to provide an update on the police department press policy. Included in
the agenda packet were two policies: the PPM policy that requires all department heads or designees to
confirm with the Mayor’s office on press releases, and Departmental Directive 30 (DD30)– a Departmental
Directive for the Police Department with detail on BPD should handle its own communications. Additionally
there was a copy of the executive order by the mayor on 1/8/25 clarifying those policies. The Chair invited
Erin to let us know if there are any updates.
EJ shared the mayor’s office has asked BPD to take up the review of DD 30 and to suggest any updates
they would like to see made by the end of the month, in order to provide the changes jointly to the Police
Commission at their next meeting. The Mayor’s Office has also asked that in doing the review, the BPD
consider policies of other VT jurisdictions (cities, VT State Police, and International Association of Chiefs of
Police, other trade institutions, etc) to take into consideration other policies and past practices. It is then
up to the commission to vote on that new directive. While it is not anticipated that Personnel Policy Manual
(PPM) will need to be updated, the Mayor’s Office will review if the city wide policy will need to be revised.
Since the office has been reviewing the press releases issued by BPD, they have provided very few edits,
but have asked some informative questions and made light edits. The floor was then opened for committee
member questions.

SC asks if any edits are made to DD 30, will that have to come forward to the Council, and if so, would it
come forward to this committee prior to the larger council?

EJ clarifies that this falls under BPD and the Police Commission. Edits will be made by those groups and
then brought forward to the full Council, not this committee. If there are any impacted changes made to
the PPM, those changes would then come forward to HRPC.

SC asks if the communication policies are on the City webpage.

EJ directs to Joe Magee, Director of Communications for the Mayor’s Office. She sees no reason why the
policies could not be on the website, and there have been no issues with the PPM policy with any personnel
or media. Large changes to the DD and PPM are not anticipated.

EL asks if the PPM needs to be revisited to clarify police communications or emergency communication.

SC clarifies her understanding that DD 30 is the clarification since there are so many different layers of
communications that come from BPD.

EL asks for clarification on the process of emergency communications (ex – when the public is at risk, like
a shooter at large.)

EJ provides clarification on the difference between an emergency communication and a press release. The
current practice is time sensitive emergency communications are sent out immediately. If there is a short
time frame for emergency communication or press release for review, that turnaround timeline is shared
by BPD staff when sent to the Mayor’s office for review. It has been a non-issue thus far.

Councilors discuss and point out that clarification to the public on the difference between a press release
and emergency communication may be helpful. EJ agrees this is one of the most helpful things councilors
can do in regards to this policy.

EL references a Seven Days article where the State Attorney advised that the press releases may violate a
“gag order.” Councilor Litwin asks if the City is reflecting on the guidelines set forth by the judge and
Attorney’s Office for DD30.

EJ Agrees and reflects that a lot of the material within DD30 is to be sure that communications coming
from DD30 aren’t violating any constitutional rights. The Mayor’s Office does want to be sure that those
guidelines are encapsulated in the policy.

EL asks for clarification that the turn around time set forth by BPD has not been an issue.

EJ shares that the longest time a release was not attended to by their office was by a few hours. It was
still reviewed before the press deadline. Reviewing the press releases is split between several members of
the Mayor’s Office, and no one has reported it being a cumbersome process.

EL asks if there is a template document to follow regarding what can and cannot be presented in a press
release.

EJ does not have one at this time, but Ingrid Jonas (Senior Advisor on Public Safety) has been looking into
it, as the Mayor’s Office has also identified it as a useful tool to have.

EL asks for an expansion on what clarifying questions or modifying information the Mayor’s Office has
asked when reviewing press releases.
EJ states any changes have been far and few between and very minor. The most recent one was that part
of the press release included court release conditions for a drug related arrest. The Mayor’s Office has
asked clarifying questions around what involves an incident with the police (which can include wellness
checks, if the person is a witness, etc.), and they are trying to differentiate instances of interaction versus
actual arrests. The end goal is for the policy to be efficient for BPD as well. There are also some tech tools
that can be utilizes to help generate the press releases.

EJ leaves the meeting at 2:41 pm.


 Subject 4.2. Review newly created ADA Interactive Process policy
LR provides an update on the ADA Interactive Process policy. This policy is cementing the practice that has
been in place by the department for years. In partnership with the City Attorney’s office, the HR office is
creating a clear outline of how ADA requests are being handled. This policy can then be referenced for any
public requests or for future use by the HR Department in the case of staff turnover. The policy is for
employees who made need accommodation to function in their role. Accommodations may be minor
(different keyboard/desk) or larger (private workspace, allowance of a service animal). The HR office
maintains confidentiality to every extent they can, but in some cases, need to inform the manager(s). This
process is initiated by the employee, and may require sharing medical information or working with a
healthcare professional to come up with an appropriate accommodation. The HR Office will then review the
accommodation ask to determine if it is reasonable to fulfil. At SCs recommendation, it will be brought
forward to the accessibility committee. The next steps for this policy are to be sent to all staff to have 15
days to review before it goes into effect.

EL asks if there is an appeal process.

LR will have to check to see if that would fall under grievance rights. There have not been incidents of
appeal. These decisions are not opinion based, but employment law. Determination of a reasonable
request is often around hardship on the City (monetarily or the impact on the employee to do their job in
full). If an accommodation requires a financial contribution by the city on behalf of the employee, that’s
when that factor comes into play. If we can keep the individual working, that’s what we want to do. We
have, for instance, purchased a new monitor. If a request costs thousands of dollars, that’s when deeper
evaluation may come into play.

SC asks if there is an external appeal process, and if so, if both internal and external appeal processes
should be laid out.

LR confirms she will look into it. The appeal could come to HRPC but it would have to be in executive
session and in a format that doesn’t violate HIPPA.

Councilors ask further clarifying questions around the potential grievance process. SC asks how claims of
discrimination are handles.

LR outlines the process: an internal investigation, or external as needed based on what employees are
involved in the claim.



 5. Department Head 360 Evaluation Update

LR provides updated on the Department Head 360 Evaluation process. There have been some slight
changes since the Committee last met. As this is the first time a Mayor has elected to roll out evaluations
in this format, there will not be any outside evaluators (including City Councilors and Commission
members). It will be strictly a self-evaluation, two peer departments heads, Chief of Staff and Deputy
Chief of Staff, and direct reports. The evaluation survey launched on January 31 st and respondents will
have two (2) weeks to complete. All data will go to a member of the HR team who will then compile all
data, removing identifying information, and present it to the Mayor.

SC asks how commissions will evaluate department heads as they are tasked to, and if the information will
be provided to associated commissions.

LR clarifies this does not replace that process, but is in addition to it. Since the evaluations are
confidential, they will not be shared with commissioners.

MB agrees that the format should be kept separately, especially now that commissioners are not
appointing the department head. The feedback from staff and commissions are both valuable, but serve
different purposes. If this is under our purview, it would make sense for the HRPC to formalize that
process for commissions.

Councilors weighed the options of what if any information would be valuable to be presented to the Council
when reappointments come to a vote. They expressed they would feel more well-informed to know how
Department Heads are received by staff, since internal and external/public facing communications can be
different.

LR will bring this feedback back to the Mayor’s office.

 6. Other Committee Business

EL returns to the BPD Press Release conversation to see if there are any follow up recommendations the
Committee wants to provide.

SC confirms the follow up actions will be two-fold: a review of DD 30 by the Police Commission which will
then come forward to City Council, and if necessary, changes to the PPM will be made which will come
forward to HRPC for review before going to Council.

EL brings forward further questions he has, including: what is being submitted by BPD and what are the
actual modifications and edits being made to press releases, and if those edits are done in line with the
ethical guidelines set forth by the courts/attorneys office or by opinion; if all departments are subject to
this policy; if it’s only being enforced now because of ongoing litigation.

SC encourages committee members to reach out to EJ directly with their further questions, as she was
invited to this meeting to answer the questions during the earlier agenda item. If the Committee would like
to ask EJ to join for the next meeting, they may do so. Some of the questions brought forth are not under
the purview of this committee, and some of these questions can be reserved for when the policy comes
forward to the full Council.

LR confirms that the role of the HRPC is to take on policies and communications that impact the
employees, not the public.
The cancelled Executive Session will tentatively be held on 2/25 at 8:30 am to review a final policy.

The next meeting is on 3/17 at 2 pm in the HR Conference Room and via Zoom.

 7. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned by Chair SC at 3:37 pm.

 8. Informational and Non-Discrimination Statements
 The City of Burlington will not tolerate unlawful harassment or discrimination on the basis of political
 or religious affiliation, race, color, national origin, place of birth, ancestry, age, sex, sexual
 orientation, gender identity, marital status, veteran status, disability, HIV positive status, crime victim
 status or genetic information. The City is also committed to providing proper access to services,
 facilities and employment opportunities. The programs and services of the City of Burlington are
 accessible to people with disabilities. Individuals who require special arrangements, auxiliary aid,
 service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a
 program, service, or activity of the City of Burlington, should contact the office of the Title II
 Burlington ADA Coordinator at 802-865-7000 as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before
 the scheduled event.