City Council Meeting — Los Angeles, CA
Date: 2022-03-11
Time: 10:00

AGENDA
 LOS ANGELES CITY
 COUNCIL
 Friday, March 11, 2022

 10:00 AM

 JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL
 CHAMBER

 ROOM 340, CITY HALL

 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
 ANGELES, CA 90012

 Submit written comment at
 LACouncilComment.com

 President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
 NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
 BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
 NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
 President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
 MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
 MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
 Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
 VACANT VACANT, Tenth District
 MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
 JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
 KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
 JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District

PUBLIC COMMENT
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, and due to concerns over Covid-19, the City Council will take all public comment by
teleconference.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 1
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CABLE TELEVISION CHANNEL 35 AND ON THE INTERNET
AT: HTTPS://CLERK.LACITY.ORG/CALENDAR. LIVE COUNCIL MEETINGS CAN ALSO BE HEARD AT: (213) 621-
CITY (METRO), (818) 904-9450 (VALLEY), (310) 471-CITY (WESTSIDE) AND (310) 547-CITY (SAN PEDRO AREA)

Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID
No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting,
press *9 to request to speak.

Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans
with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay
Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information located on page 2 of this agenda.

Telecommunication Relay Services

Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements
in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of
hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced
telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS)
communications.

Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place
and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories
for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of
providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.

What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the
equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English
Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service.
Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.

Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This
is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider,
to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.

For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities,
visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.

SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO
MUNICIPAL




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 2
 BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council
meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are
available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring
Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item
not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting
of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called
"special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council
agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested
to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all
items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda.
The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these
items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted
on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items
for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple
Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to
one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20
minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited
to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council
shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms
with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized
by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 3
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance
requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City
law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq.
More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213)
978-1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized
by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the
original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other
Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question
have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum
of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this
motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8
members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda
will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be
adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first
consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The
votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance
requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote
for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member
of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or
where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the
prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the
next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number,
Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require
an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter,
or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting
for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action.
A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to
forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote
for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member
of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or
where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the
prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the
next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number,




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 4
Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require
an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter,
or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting
for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated
officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action.
A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to
forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it
having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during
a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 5
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Friday, March 11, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET,
LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21-1375
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to various actions to implement the
 Los Angeles Accessory Dwelling Unit Accelerator Program (ADU Program).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
 MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD), or designee, to:
 a. Negotiate and execute a contract with ONEgeneration to implement the
 ADU Program with a compensation amount of up to $2,012,887, and a
 three-year contract term commencing on or about March 1, 2022,
 subject to funding availability, compliance with the City’s contracting
 requirements, and review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.

 b. Transfer up to $200,000 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund’s ADU
 Accelerator Program account to Bloomberg Philanthropies through its
 fiscal agent, the Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles, to reimburse for ADU
 Program expenditures incurred from January through March 2022 while
 the ADU Program transitioned over to the LAHD.

 c. Prepare Controller instructions and any technical corrections as
 necessary to those transactions included in this report to implement the
 intent of those transactions, subject to the approval of the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO).




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 6
 2. RESOLVE that one Senior Project Coordinator position, Classification Code
 1350, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED to be employed in the LAHD to
 oversee the ADU Program, subject to allocation by the Board of Civil Service
 Commissioners, and exempt in accordance with Charter Section 1001(d)
 (4) based on the position being grant-funded for a term of no more than
 two years, which may be extended for one additional year, for a maximum
 exemption period of three years.

 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
 a. Establish new accounts and appropriate $2,600,000 within the
 Affordable Housing Trust Fund No. 44G/43 from the available cash
 balance as follows:
 Account No. Account Name Amount
 43V143 Los Angeles Housing Department $124,702.56
 43V299 Reimbursement of General Fund Costs 65,224.23
 43VB50 ADU Accelerator Program 2,415,952.21
 Total: $2,600,000.00

 b. Increase appropriations in the amount of $124,702.56 within the LAHD
 No. 100/43 as follows:
 Account No. Account Name Amount
 001010 Salaries, General $97,983.43
 001070 Salaries, As-Needed 12,021.62
 006030 Leasing 14,697.51
 Total: $124,702.56



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no additional impact to
 the General Fund at this time. The proposed Los Angeles ADU Program will be
 partially funded by the $2.6 million General City Purposes Fund allocation for this
 purpose in the 2021-22 Adopted Budget and the City's annual Permanent Local
 Housing Allocation Plan Program allocation.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations comply
 with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.




Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 7
 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committees waived consideration
 of the above matter)

(2) 15-0671
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND
 RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the First Amendment to Contract
 C-125885 with B.J. Used Tire and Rubber Recycling, Inc. (B.J. Used
 Tire) for the collection, transportation and processing of used/waste tires
 for beneficial reuse.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the President or two members, Board of Public Works, on
 behalf of the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS), to execute Amendment No. 1
 to C-125885 with B.J. Used Tire and Rubber Recycling, Inc. (B.J. Used
 Tire) for the collection, transportation and processing of used/waste tires
 for beneficial reuse to extend the term by five years upon execution for
 a total term of ten years and six months, without a change to the total
 compensation amount of $4,000,00, subject to the approval of the City
 Attorney and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that
 funding in the amount of $200,000 is identified in the BOS’s Board Report
 for 2021-22 and is provided by the Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund.
 The Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund is not considered a full cost
 recovery fund as such the services provided by this fund are subsidized by
 the General Fund. Funding beyond the current year will be appropriated
 through the City’s budget process. The agreement contain a Financial
 Liability Clause which limits the City’s annual financial obligation to the
 amount approved in the corresponding year’s budget.

 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation
 complies with the City's financial policies in that expenditures of special
 funds are limited to the mandates of the funding sources.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - APRIL 18, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APRIL 13, 2022)



(3) 20-1552




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 8
 CD 14 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST relative
 to purchasing properties in the State Route 710 Corridor for
 affordable/homeless housing.
 (Homelessness and Poverty Committee report to be submitted in
 Council)
 (Visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents)

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




(4) 19-0898-S1
 CD 8 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - BONIN) relative to
 a Supplemental Agreement to Contract No. C-134516 between the City of
 Los Angeles, acting through the Bureau of Engineering, and Destination
 Crenshaw, a non-profit agency, for the design and construction of the
 Destination Crenshaw Project
 (Public Works Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public
 hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment
 will be provided.)
 (Visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(5) 22-0241
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (O'FARRELL - LEE for BUSCAINO - DE
 LEON - RAMAN) relative to renaming the Los Angeles Police Department’s
 Northeast Community Police Station as the “Deputy Chief Margaret Ann
 York Northeast Community Police Station.”

 Recommendation for Council action:
 RENAME the Los Angeles Police Department’s Northeast Community
 Police Station as the “Deputy Chief Margaret Ann York Northeast




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 9
 Community Police Station,” with this name only applying to the building
 and not to the Division.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Information, Technology, and General Services Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)

(6) 22-0204
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION AND COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS relative to authorizing the
 proposed Second Amendment with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. for
 professional engineering services for the State Route 47 – Vincent Thomas
 Bridge and Front Street Interchange Reconfiguration Project.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Harbor Commissioners
 (Board) that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the
 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in
 accordance with Article ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA
 Guidelines.

 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21-9859
 authorizing proposed Second Amendment to Agreement No. 18-3618
 with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - APRIL 25, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APRIL 13, 2022)

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

(7) 21-0008-S26




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 10
 CD 7 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (RODRIGUEZ – LEE) relative
 to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street
 segments in Council District Seven.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4
 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the
 parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven
 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the
 following street segments:
 a. Del Sur Street between San Fernando Road and the cul-de-sac

 b. Haddon Avenue between the cul-de-sac adjacent to the Pacoima
 Wash and Fielding Street

 c. Nordhoff Street between the 1-405 undercrossing to the Pacoima
 Wash

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow
 Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific
 hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No.
 1.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideraton of the above
 matter.)

(8) 21-0008-S27
 CD 7 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (RODRIGUEZ – MARTINEZ)
 relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain
 street segments in Council District Seven.

 Recommendations for Council action:




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 11
 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4
 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the
 parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven
 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the
 following street segments:
 a. Both sides of Bledsoe Street between Herrick Avenue and
 Glenoaks Boulevard

 b. Both sides of Bledsoe Street between Foothill Boulevard to Olive
 View Drive

 c. Both sides of Foothill Boulevard between Maclay Street and
 Gridley Street

 d. West side of San Fernando Road between Cobalt Street and El
 Cajon Street

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow
 Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific
 hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No.
 1.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.



 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter.)

(9) 22-0008-S1
 CD 15 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO – LEE) relative to the
 prohibition of oversized vehicles parking along a segment of West 9th
 Street in San Pedro.

 Recommendations for Council action:




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 12
 1. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to prohibit the parking of
 vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over six feet in height,
 during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along both sides of West
 9th Street between South Western Avenue and South Weymouth
 Avenue, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4,
 and the California Vehicle Code Section 22507.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of
 a "tow away, no parking" restriction for oversized vehicles, with the
 specific hours detailed, at the above locations.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of this matter.)

(10) 22-0008-S2
 CD 12 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to the
 prohibition of oversized vehicles along both sides of San Fernando Mission
 Road from Lindley Avenue to Chimineas Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to prohibit the parking of
 vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 84 inches in
 height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along both sides
 of San Fernando Mission Road from Lindley Avenue to Chimineas
 Avenue, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4,
 and the California Vehicle Code Section 22507.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of
 a "tow away, no parking" restriction for oversized vehicles, with the
 specific hours detailed, at the above locations.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 13
 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter.)

(11) 22-0170-S1
 CD 8 MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - DE LEON) and RESOLUTION relative to
 issuing bonds not to exceed $35,000,000 to finance the acquisition,
 predevelopment, rehabilitation, and construction of a 62-unit multifamily
 rental housing project located at 8400-8500 South Vermont Avenue in
 Council District 8.

 Recommendation of Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION and Interlocal Agreement to
 allow the Los Angeles County Development Authority to issue bonds in
 an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 to finance the
 acquisition, predevelopment, rehabilitation, and construction of a 62-unit
 multifamily rental housing project located at 8400-8500 South Vermont
 Avenue in Council District 8.




(12) 20-0600-S83
 MOTION (PRICE - RODRIGUEZ) relative to amending Council action of
 May 25, 2021 for funding for tree trimming services in Council District 9.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. AMEND the Council action of May 25, 2021 relative to “FY 2020-21
 Budget/Los Angeles Police Department/Reinvest Funds for Impacted
 Communities” (Council file No. 20-0600-S83) to transfer and
 appropriate $300,000 from the “Environmental Equity and Justice
 Fund-CD9” Account in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 14
 the Bureau of Street Services Fund No. 100/86, Account No. 001090
 (Salaries-Overtime) for tree trimming services in Council District 9.

 2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any corrections,
 clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions,
 including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this
 Motion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or account
 numbers; said corrections/clarifications/changes may be made orally,
 electronically or by any other means.




(13) 22-0252
 MOTION (DE LEON – O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Mayor’s special recognition of the Ukraine community
 on February 26-28, 2022, including the illumination of City Hall.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $1,200 from the Mayor’s portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Service Fund No. 100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with
 the Mayor’s special recognition of the Ukraine community on February 26,
 27, 28, 2022, including the illumination of City Hall.




Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 15
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on
a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil
Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the
Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System,
at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 16

Los Angeles City Council, Journal/Council Proceeding
Friday, March 11, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS
ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

 (For further details see Official Council Files)

 (For communications referred by the President see Referral Memorandum)

Roll Call
Members Present: Bonin, Buscaino, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
O'Farrell, Price , Rodriguez (10); Absent: Blumenfield, Cedillo, Koretz, Raman (4)

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations - SEE ATTACHED

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1) 21-1375
 HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to various actions to implement the
 Los Angeles Accessory Dwelling Unit Accelerator Program (ADU Program).

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE
 MAYOR:

 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department
 (LAHD), or designee, to:
 a. Negotiate and execute a contract with ONEgeneration to implement the
 ADU Program with a compensation amount of up to $2,012,887, and a
 three-year contract term commencing on or about March 1, 2022,
 subject to funding availability, compliance with the City’s contracting
 requirements, and review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.

 b. Transfer up to $200,000 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund’s ADU
 Accelerator Program account to Bloomberg Philanthropies through its
 fiscal agent, the Mayor’s Fund for Los Angeles, to reimburse for ADU




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 1
 Program expenditures incurred from January through March 2022 while
 the ADU Program transitioned over to the LAHD.

 c. Prepare Controller instructions and any technical corrections as
 necessary to those transactions included in this report to implement the
 intent of those transactions, subject to the approval of the City
 Administrative Officer (CAO).

 2. RESOLVE that one Senior Project Coordinator position, Classification Code
 1350, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED to be employed in the LAHD to
 oversee the ADU Program, subject to allocation by the Board of Civil Service
 Commissioners, and exempt in accordance with Charter Section 1001(d)
 (4) based on the position being grant-funded for a term of no more than
 two years, which may be extended for one additional year, for a maximum
 exemption period of three years.

 3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
 a. Establish new accounts and appropriate $2,600,000 within the
 Affordable Housing Trust Fund No. 44G/43 from the available cash
 balance as follows:
 Account No. Account Name Amount
 43V143 Los Angeles Housing Department $124,702.56
 43V299 Reimbursement of General Fund Costs 65,224.23
 43VB50 ADU Accelerator Program 2,415,952.21
 Total: $2,600,000.00

 b. Increase appropriations in the amount of $124,702.56 within the LAHD
 No. 100/43 as follows:
 Account No. Account Name Amount
 001010 Salaries, General $97,983.43
 001070 Salaries, As-Needed 12,021.62
 006030 Leasing 14,697.51
 Total: $124,702.56



 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no additional impact to
 the General Fund at this time. The proposed Los Angeles ADU Program will be
 partially funded by the $2.6 million General City Purposes Fund allocation for this
 purpose in the 2021-22 Adopted Budget and the City's annual Permanent Local
 Housing Allocation Plan Program allocation.




Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 2
 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations comply
 with the City’s Financial Policies.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committees waived consideration
 of the above matter)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Cedillo, Koretz, Raman (4)

(2) 15-0671
 ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND
 RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the First Amendment to Contract
 C-125885 with B.J. Used Tire and Rubber Recycling, Inc. (B.J. Used
 Tire) for the collection, transportation and processing of used/waste tires
 for beneficial reuse.

 Recommendation for Council action:
 AUTHORIZE the President or two members, Board of Public Works, on
 behalf of the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS), to execute Amendment No. 1
 to C-125885 with B.J. Used Tire and Rubber Recycling, Inc. (B.J. Used
 Tire) for the collection, transportation and processing of used/waste tires
 for beneficial reuse to extend the term by five years upon execution for
 a total term of ten years and six months, without a change to the total
 compensation amount of $4,000,00, subject to the approval of the City
 Attorney and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements.

 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that
 funding in the amount of $200,000 is identified in the BOS’s Board Report
 for 2021-22 and is provided by the Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund.
 The Solid Waste Resources Revenue Fund is not considered a full cost
 recovery fund as such the services provided by this fund are subsidized by
 the General Fund. Funding beyond the current year will be appropriated
 through the City’s budget process. The agreement contain a Financial
 Liability Clause which limits the City’s annual financial obligation to the
 amount approved in the corresponding year’s budget.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 3
 Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation
 complies with the City's financial policies in that expenditures of special
 funds are limited to the mandates of the funding sources.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - APRIL 18, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APRIL 13, 2022)



 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Cedillo, Koretz, Raman (4)

(3) 20-1552
 CD 14 COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST relative
 to purchasing properties in the State Route 710 Corridor for
 affordable/homeless housing.
 (Homelessness and Poverty Committee report to be submitted in
 Council)
 (Visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents)

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez, O'Farrell,
 Price , Rodriguez (10); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Cedillo, Koretz, Raman (4)

(4) 19-0898-S1
 CD 8 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - BONIN) relative to
 a Supplemental Agreement to Contract No. C-134516 between the City of
 Los Angeles, acting through the Bureau of Engineering, and Destination
 Crenshaw, a non-profit agency, for the design and construction of the
 Destination Crenshaw Project
 (Public Works Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public
 hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment
 will be provided.)




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 4
 (Visit www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted




 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Raman, Rodriguez (11); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz, Price (3)


Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for
Consideration)

(5) 22-0241
 CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (O'FARRELL - LEE for BUSCAINO - DE
 LEON - RAMAN) relative to renaming the Los Angeles Police Department’s
 Northeast Community Police Station as the “Deputy Chief Margaret Ann
 York Northeast Community Police Station.”

 Recommendation for Council action:
 RENAME the Los Angeles Police Department’s Northeast Community
 Police Station as the “Deputy Chief Margaret Ann York Northeast
 Community Police Station,” with this name only applying to the building
 and not to the Division.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted


 (Information, Technology, and General Services Committee waived
 consideration of the above matter)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(6) 22-0204
 CD 15 ADMINISTRATIVE EXEMPTION AND COMMUNICATION FROM THE
 BOARD OF HARBOR COMMISSIONERS relative to authorizing the
 proposed Second Amendment with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. for
 professional engineering services for the State Route 47 – Vincent Thomas
 Bridge and Front Street Interchange Reconfiguration Project.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 5
 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the determination by the Board of Harbor Commissioners
 (Board) that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the
 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in
 accordance with Article ll, Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA
 Guidelines.

 2. APPROVE the Port of Los Angeles Resolution No. 21-9859
 authorizing proposed Second Amendment to Agreement No. 18-3618
 with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc.


 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that there is no impact to the
 General Fund.

 Community Impact Statement: None submitted

 TIME LIMIT FILE - APRIL 25, 2022

 (LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APRIL 13, 2022)

 (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the
 above matter)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(7) 21-0008-S26
 CD 7 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (RODRIGUEZ – LEE) relative
 to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain street
 segments in Council District Seven.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4
 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the
 parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven
 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the
 following street segments:
 a. Del Sur Street between San Fernando Road and the cul-de-sac




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 6
 b. Haddon Avenue between the cul-de-sac adjacent to the Pacoima
 Wash and Fielding Street

 c. Nordhoff Street between the 1-405 undercrossing to the Pacoima
 Wash

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow
 Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific
 hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No.
 1.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideraton of the above
 matter.)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(8) 21-0008-S27
 CD 7 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (RODRIGUEZ – MARTINEZ)
 relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along certain
 street segments in Council District Seven.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4
 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the
 parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven
 feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the
 following street segments:
 a. Both sides of Bledsoe Street between Herrick Avenue and
 Glenoaks Boulevard

 b. Both sides of Bledsoe Street between Foothill Boulevard to Olive
 View Drive




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 7
 c. Both sides of Foothill Boulevard between Maclay Street and
 Gridley Street

 d. West side of San Fernando Road between Cobalt Street and El
 Cajon Street

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow
 Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific
 hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No.
 1.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.



 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter.)

 Adopted item as Amended by Motion (Rodriguez – Martinez) Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(9) 22-0008-S1
 CD 15 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (BUSCAINO – LEE) relative to the
 prohibition of oversized vehicles parking along a segment of West 9th
 Street in San Pedro.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to prohibit the parking of
 vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over six feet in height,
 during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along both sides of West
 9th Street between South Western Avenue and South Weymouth
 Avenue, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4,
 and the California Vehicle Code Section 22507.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 8
 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of
 a "tow away, no parking" restriction for oversized vehicles, with the
 specific hours detailed, at the above locations.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.


 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of this matter.)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(10) 22-0008-S2
 CD 12 CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to the
 prohibition of oversized vehicles along both sides of San Fernando Mission
 Road from Lindley Avenue to Chimineas Avenue.

 Recommendations for Council action:

 1. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to prohibit the parking of
 vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 84 inches in
 height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along both sides
 of San Fernando Mission Road from Lindley Avenue to Chimineas
 Avenue, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4,
 and the California Vehicle Code Section 22507.

 2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT),
 upon the adoption of the Resolution, to post signs giving notice of
 a "tow away, no parking" restriction for oversized vehicles, with the
 specific hours detailed, at the above locations.

 3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or
 clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent
 of this Resolution.


 Community Impact Statement: None submitted.




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 9
 (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above
 matter.)

 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(11) 22-0170-S1
 CD 8 MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - DE LEON) and RESOLUTION relative to
 issuing bonds not to exceed $35,000,000 to finance the acquisition,
 predevelopment, rehabilitation, and construction of a 62-unit multifamily
 rental housing project located at 8400-8500 South Vermont Avenue in
 Council District 8.

 Recommendation of Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION and Interlocal Agreement to
 allow the Los Angeles County Development Authority to issue bonds in
 an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 to finance the
 acquisition, predevelopment, rehabilitation, and construction of a 62-unit
 multifamily rental housing project located at 8400-8500 South Vermont
 Avenue in Council District 8.




 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(12) 20-0600-S83
 MOTION (PRICE - RODRIGUEZ) relative to amending Council action of
 May 25, 2021 for funding for tree trimming services in Council District 9.

 Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:

 1. AMEND the Council action of May 25, 2021 relative to “FY 2020-21
 Budget/Los Angeles Police Department/Reinvest Funds for Impacted
 Communities” (Council file No. 20-0600-S83) to transfer and
 appropriate $300,000 from the “Environmental Equity and Justice




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 10
 Fund-CD9” Account in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to
 the Bureau of Street Services Fund No. 100/86, Account No. 001090
 (Salaries-Overtime) for tree trimming services in Council District 9.

 2. AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any corrections,
 clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions,
 including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this
 Motion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or account
 numbers; said corrections/clarifications/changes may be made orally,
 electronically or by any other means.




 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)

(13) 22-0252
 MOTION (DE LEON – O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in
 connection with the Mayor’s special recognition of the Ukraine community
 on February 26-28, 2022, including the illumination of City Hall.

 Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
 THE MAYOR:
 TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $1,200 from the Mayor’s portion of the
 Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events line item in the General
 City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Service Fund No. 100/40,
 Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with
 the Mayor’s special recognition of the Ukraine community on February 26,
 27, 28, 2022, including the illumination of City Hall.




 Adopted Item Forthwith
 Ayes: Bonin, Buscaino, Cedillo, de León, Harris-Dawson, Krekorian, Lee, Martinez,
 O'Farrell, Price , Raman, Rodriguez (12); Nays: (0); Absent: Blumenfield, Koretz (2)


Items Called Special




 Friday - March 11, 2022 - PAGE 11
 COMMENDATORY RESOLUTIONS


MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Cedillo De Leon Steve Salas
Martinez Price Armando Olivas
Martinez Price Barbara Haywood

Rodriguez Raman Public Service Loan
 Forgiveness Program
 ADJOURNING MOTIONS


 MOVED BY SECONDED BY NAME
Price – Harris-Dawson All Councilmembers Derf Reklaw
Harris-Dawson All Councilmembers Christopher J. Castillo
 , --
 ,; p::-r;,.J~
 •
 " -
 "'---
 ..... "" - .. . c....... 1_.. ;
 ~r-.·: 1 ~ l''il f. -~ , , ....,.i ... :-c~o··-:-,..
 •' 'Vv'o.1., ... 1_ ,._..:..ihJ.,t 0 ~:... 1 ~ i C  0
 I#·-11
 o
 ·- -----------
 mo r 1 on

 I MOVE that $260,000 in the "Homeless Encampment Outreach & Publication-CDS "
line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100-56, representing a Council District Eight
allocation from the Reinvestment of LAPD Funds for Impacted Communities (CF 20-0600-83),
be allocated to Community Build, Inc. to supplement services under Contract No. C-137089
for the Safe Passages program; and to instruct I authorize the City Clerk to prepare, process
and execute the necessary documents with and/or payments, in the above amount, with
Community Build, Inc., for the above purpose , subject to the approval of the City Attorney as
to form .

 I FURTHER MOVE that $675,000 in the "Homeless Encampment Outreach &
Publication-CDS " line item in the General City Purpo·ses Fund No. 100-56, representing a
Council District Eight allocation from the Reinvestment of LAPD Funds for Impacted
Communities (CF 20-0600-83), be transferred I appropriated to a new line item within the
same Fund entitled " Homeless Encampment Outreach and Rental Assistance/ Homelessness
Prevention Services-CDS ," for homeless outreach and rental assistance/homelessness
prevention services in Council District 8.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Clerk be authorized to make any technical
corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above i order to effectuate the
intent of this Motion.




 SECONDED BY:
 MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON

 ;72~trict ,
ak
 - ..
 ....,_.... .

 1 ) CITY CLERK t-OR PLACEMENT ON NEXT
 --
 MOTION
 REGULAR COUNCIL AGENDA TO BE POSTED #52
 The Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) has committed sworn resources to
numerous fire incidents since July 1, 2021. Major response efforts including the Dixie,
Monument and Caldor fires have significantly drawn upon LAFD resources and burdened
the Sworn Overtime account. Expenditures have been further escalated, particularly in
recent months, from the deployment of sworn members on emergency recall to fill field
vacancies throughout the City for various reasons, among them an Omicron variant surge
in December and January among the ranks. Recalls are activated when the department
cannot fill field posts through additio nal assigned hire or voluntary overtime. Th is overtime
is also billed to the Sworn Overtime account. Although adjustments have been requested in
the upcoming Midyear Financial Status Report (FSR), these extraordinary expenditures
have resulted in depletion of the Sworn Overtime account prior to the release and
consideration of that report. Hence, the Department will experience a payroll shortfall for
the pay period ending March 12, 2022.

 Council approval is urgently needed to expedite the necessary transfer of funds to
balance salary accounts. LAFD will transfer $600,000 from Sworn Salaries to Sworn
Overtime. As a transfer between accounts, this action will not affect fiscal impact
assessments in the Midyear FSR.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that City Council, subject to approval of the Mayor, authorize
the Controller to transfer $600,000 within Fund 100, as follows:

 Fund Account Amount
 From: 100/38 001012, Salaries Sworn $ 600,000

 To: 100/38 001092, Overtime Sworn $ 600 ,000

 I FURTHER MOVE that the Fire Department be authorized to prepare Controller
instructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of the City Administrative
Officer, and that the Controller be authorized to implement the instructions.




 ~
 ..
 PRESENTED BY:
 PAUL KREKORIAN
 Councilmember, 2nd District




 SECONDE(lb~
 MOTION ART;;,, l"Ar<K.:i nf:l'I. IM
 · L · r:UUv~I IUl'f. ~ 1~clunoUKHOUO

 Venice would not exist today without the incredible work Arthur Reese and Irving Tabor put into establishing the
 community as a global tourist destination and cultural center in Los Angeles. The significant role played by these
 two African-American co-founders of Venice deserve greater recognition from the City of Los Angeles.

 The community of Oakwood in Venice was established in the 1920s by African American families and employees
 of developer Abbot Kinney, who contracted Arthur Reese to help design and build the canals modeled after
 Venice, Italy. Oakwood was the only area in Venice in the early 1900s that was available for African-Americans to
 purchase land to build homes on and sits north of Electric Avenue, between Westminster and San Juan. The
 Oakwood community is home to a rich and unique history that must be preserved for generations to come.

 Arthur Reese was a designer and businessman from Louisiana, who built a house for his family in Oakwood and
 encouraged others from back home to join him in Venice. He designed the original gondola used to take tourists
 around the canals, and eventually became the head designer of Venice of America, Abbot Kinney's popular
 amusement park.

 In 1910, 17 year-old Irving Tabor was invited by his cousin, Arthur Reese, to come live with him and work on
 establishing Venice of America. After meeting Abbot Kinney while working on the pier, Irving Tabor was hired as
 Kinney's chauffeur, leading to a close partnership that lasted until Kinney's death. Kinney left his large villa to
 Tabor, who because of racist housing covenants, cut the house into three pieces and moved it to the Oakwood
 community. The Irvin Tabor Family Residences (HCM #1149) represent one of the first residential properties in
 Venice built by and for African Americans.

 Established in the 1950s after residents gave up their land to create the only green space in Oakwood, Oakwood
 Recreation Center (767 California Avenue) has long been a gathering place for the community. Descendants from
 the original African American community, existing residents, community leaders, and others strongly request
 Oakwood Park be renamed in honor of Arthur Reese and Irving Tabor in recognition of the significant
 contributions African Americans have made to Venice.

 I THEREFORE MOVE to request that the Board of Recreation and Parks Commissioners rename Oakwood
 Recreation Center to "Reese-Tabor Park and Recreation Center."




kl/f6~ PRESENTED BY:
vf!tCY MION1N
 Councilmember, 11th District



 ~-MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON
 Councilmember, 8th District



 SECONDED BY:

 UAR 1 l ~
 '11\ I 0, 1'rii"(i\.,, 11/:Ju.111, t:Ut.JLA I/UN, & NEIGHBORHOOU
 MOTION

 In 2022, Americans continue to be burdened by student loan debt. According to the Federal Reserve,
among the class of 2020, 55% ofbachelor ·s degree recipients took out student loans. graduating with an average
of $28,400 in federal and pri vate debt. Am ericans owe nearly $ 1. 75 trillion in student loan debt, spread out
among about 46 milli on borro\vers. This system is often predatory and disproportionately impacts coll ege
students of color who are the most likely to use federa l loans- saddling them with debts that impact future
fin ancial ga in.

 The COVlD-1 9 pandemic has given rise to unprecedented economic hardships for our youth, especially
those who already have debt. Recognition that student loans have hindered thi s group from full y participating in
the economy is a key foundation to systemica lly investing in our youth. Student debt cuts off the ladder to
economi c mobil ity, making opportunities like owning a home or becoming financially independent increasingly
difficult to attai n. Oftentimes, students are financially punished fo r attempting to better themse lves and their
fa milies. To furth er financial wellbeing for future Angelenos, they need to be abl e to create economi c
opportunities to be able to stay and contribute to their own and the City's livelihoods.

 Building on the work of the Youth Developm ent Task Force, reforms and programs have been identified
to better serve young peopl e. The Los Angel es City Youth Development Department (YDD) was created to
empower and give voice to the nearly 800.000 youth in this City. One of the services that should be offered
through this Department is a suite of trainings and courses on coll ege aid and personal fin ancial management,
such as financial literacy and certification, saving and investing, and other wealth-building support for young
Angelenos. These tra inings and courses could provide a better found ation for personal fin ance through
educati on on budgeting skills and lessons on student loan borrowing practices. Creating a youth centric
knowledge base will serve as a useful repos itory of data that can better prepare youth on the benefits of personal
financing.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the City Administrative Offi cer (CAO), in
coordinati on with the Youth Development Department, with assistance from the Economic and Workforce
Devel opm ent Department (EWDD), Community Investment for Families Department (ClFD), the Office of
Finance, and other pertinent departments, be requested to report ba ck on the proposed admini strati ve operation ,
oversight, and estimated costs needed to establish these tools and resources for young people.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the CAO be di rected to identify funding in the 2022-23 Budget to support the
intent of this Moti on.
 BUDGET & FINANCE




 MOTION

 I MOVE that $1 ,000,000 in the " Woodman Boulevard Sidewalks" line item in
the Unappropriated Fund No. 100-58 (Account No. 580367), be appropriated to a new
Account in the Capital Improvement Expense Program Fund No. 100-54 entitled ,
"Woodman Boulevard Sidewalks."


 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Administrative Officer be authorized to make
any corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, in
order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.




 SECONDED BY:,,~~



ak



 MAR 11 2022
 MOTION

 In ~~~~';ln~ !~~~~Yn~
 less than 60 days, tens of millions of student loan borrowers, City
employees, are slated to be thrown back into repayment on student loans as the economy experiences the
highest rate of inflation in nearly four decades. Payments on these loans as well as interest accumulation have
been paused since March 2020 due to the economic crisis created by the COVID-19 pandemic. The U .S. federal
government currently runs the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program which cancels the balances of direct loans
for eligible borrowers who are employed full-time in government or not-for-profit organizations once they've made
120 monthly qualified payments under qualified repayment plans. Many City employees may be ineligible for the
Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program either because they have private student loans, work part-time, or are
unable to navigate the system itself.

 The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified a City staffing shortage still felt from the The Great Recession.
If the City hopes to increase staffing levels and recrnit a highly educated workforce, Student Loan Forgiveness
incentives may help attract qualified candidates. A dual effort must be made to both proactively help young
Angelenos from being saddled with student loan debt, while retaining talented employees \Vho already struggle
with student loan debt.

 The Youth Development Department (YDD) was created to be the stronghold for youth resources. With
the YD D 's proposed suite of training and courses on college aid and personal financial management, this
wealth-building support for young Angelenos may further prepare youth to avoid harmful student loan
borrowing practices. Completion of these courses should be paired with an educational support stipend that can
help support students who already have debt associated with educational costs. Participants of the financial
management program should also be encouraged to take part in workforce training catered to public service,
which may help address the City's staffing needs.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council instruct the City Administrative Officer (CAO), in
coordination with the YDD, the Office of Finance, and other pertinent departments, be requested to report back
on the feasibility of establishing a one million dollar single payment fund for stipends available to participants
of the YDD 's student financial literacy program.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Council instruct the City Legislative Analyst (CLA), CAO, Office of
Finance in coordination with the Personnel Department to report back on any gaps in the Public Service Student
Loan Forgiveness Program and what options there might be for a City-run similar program.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the CAO be directed to identify funding in the 2022-23 Budget to support the
intent of this Motion.
 r AJ,__ . . · fl n · [
 PRESENT~~~
 MONICA RODRJGU~
 PLANNING &LAND USE MANAGEMENT
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, the economic challenges facing small and locally owned businesses in Los Angeles are severe,
especially in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, corporate consolidation, labor s hortages, and rising commercial rents;
and

 WHEREAS, the restaurant and hospitality industry, powered by small and locally owned businesses, many of
which are owned by immigrants and people of color, is a vitally important part of the C ity's economy, employing
380,000 and generating more than $200 million in tax revenues to the City prior to the COVID- 19 pandemic; and

 WHEREAS. under the Los Angeles Municipal Code. a restaurant can only be permitted to sell alcohol by
obtaining a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or meeting the eligibility requirements for a Conditional Use Exception
(CUE); and

 WHEREAS, the CU P process can often be time consuming and costly for both applicants and City staff and
resources, hindering entrepreneurs ' ability to create or expand their businesses and exacerbating the structural
disadvantages that small businesses face relative to large formula businesses; and

 WHEREAS. very few restaurants are eligible for and have utilized the CUE process: and

 WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the public health and economic impacts of the COVID- 19 pandemic, and
further appreciates the need to facilitate temporary Zoning Code relief to support the local economy and livelihood of
those living and working in the City; and

 WHEREAS, the City intends to create a new streamlined process known as the Restaurant Beverage Prog ram for
sit-down restaurants only as an alternative to the CUP and CUE process to remove economic and time constraints,
promote inclusive economic development, and improve regulatory conditions for small and locally owned restaurants;
and

 WHEREAS, this ordinance will contain more and stricter standards than those typically imposed during the CUP
or CUE process and require participating restaurants to be subject to enforcement procedures in order to balance the
needs of all neighborhood and community stakeholders; and

 WHEREAS. the City has undertaken an environmental review of the proposed provisions and found that will not
have a s ignificant effect on the environment (ENV-2018-4661-ND), and further found that aspects of the proposed
regulatory relief are exempt from environmental review (ENY-2020-31 54-CE);

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by the adoption of this Resolution, the Council hereby activates
a new streamlined permitting land use regulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage Program, that shall be in force and
full effect in the geographical boundaries attached in Exhibit A.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based on the findings outlined in Exhibit B relative to the geographic
boundaries found in Exhibit A maps, the Restaurant Beverage Program is in conformity with public necessity,
convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice.


 PRESENTED BY:
 Q~
 NITHYARAAN



 SECONDE
1. The Restaurant Beverage Program (RBP) will provide a public necessity within the
 areas mapped in Exhibit A by removing financial barriers for sit-down restaurants
 and promoting economic development, in light of the financial impacts associated
 with the COVID-19 pandemic.

 The restaurant and hospitality industry is an important part of the City's economy,
 employing more than 380 ,000 people and generating more than $200 million in tax
 revenue to the City during pre-pandemic levels. The proposed Ordinance will preserve
 and strengthen a viable sector of the City's economy by creating the RBP, which will
 reduce the costs and time for sit-down restaurants in the mapped areas to obtain City
 approval to serve alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption, while subjecting them to
 more than 50 provisions. Alcohol service provides a substation portion of restaurants'
 revenue and often make or break their viability as a business, however, restaurants with
 alcohol sales must meet both state and local regulations for serving alcohol. The RBP
 will offer an administrative clearance process to allow the sale of alcohol in sit-down
 restaurants with an operating kitchen and a full menu. In addition, new restaurants with
 alcohol service under the RBP will be subject to enforcement measures and security
 standards. This in-turn will provide long-term financial incentives as it will bolster the
 opening of new restaurants, enable the hiring of new employees, and create more
 vibrant neighborhoods.

 The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent stay-at-home and indoor restrictions have
 presented unprecedented financial challenges to sit-down restaurants throughout the
 City, namely those located within the mapped areas. A simpler, more predictable, less
 costly process to serve alcoholic beverages would ease some of the burdens placed on
 impacted restaurants , giving them a boost and reducing the time needed for them to
 re-open and start hiring people. As such, the RBP will create a service that is beneficial
 to the community, City, and region mapped by reducing the amount of entry barriers for
 new local restaurants.

2. The RBP will provide a public convenience within the areas mapped in Exhibit A
 by accommodating the demand for an amenity that will serve residents, workers,
 employees, and visitors.

 A variety of uses, including sit-down restaurants, are necessary for the conservation ,
 development, and success of a vibrant neighborhood. The proposed RBP reflects a shift
 in how the City will process alcohol requests for eligible sit-down restaurants. As such,
 the RBP will provide local sit-down restaurants with a boost, which will allow them to
 open quicker, expand , hire employees, and become an economically viable business. By
 creating a consistent and streamlined review of alcohol requests, the RBP will create
 more vibrant neighborhoods that will benefit employees , local residents, and visitors
 leading to the growth of regulated sit-down restaurants within the mapped areas, which
 are planned and zoned for commercial uses such as restaurants.
.·

 On-site alcohol service incidental to food service is an amenity that is often expected in
 bona fide sit-down restaurants. The local community, employees, patrons of adjacent
 commercial uses, and the residents in the neighborhood will be able to utilize the
 benefits of having on-site sit-down restaurants and alcohol service nearby. Furthermore,
 the RBP incorporates more than 50 operating standards to ensure that the alcohol
 service will not be disruptive to the community.

 3. The RBP contains more than 50 provisions to ensure that it will not adversely
 affect the welfare of the areas mapped in Exhibit A.

 The RBP's provisions are intended to protect the public health, welfare, and safety of the
 communities within the mapped areas. The City is establishing operational and enforcing
 policies via the RBP to regulate alcohol service in eligible sit-down restaurants.
 Therefore, alcohol service under the RBP must be incidental to food service on-site
 consumption. This means that high-impact uses such as bars, nightclubs, and liquor
 stores will not be eligible under the RBP and must obtain a Conditional Use Permit
 (CUP). Eligible restaurants will not be allowed to have dancing, live entertainment, pool
 tables, and portable bars. Bar-like practices, such as minimum drink purchase,
 admission charges, and age limitations, will also be prohibited.

 Operating standards will ensure that impacts to the community, such as noise, will be
 kept at a minimum. The RBP will prohibit the use of television monitors and speakers in
 outdoor areas. Restaurants will also be required to remove graffiti, clean debris and litter,
 maintain an electronic age verification device, and respond to patron complaints in a
 timely manner. As a means of establishing additional safety policies, the RBP contains
 interior and exterior lighting requirements and will require restaurants to install and
 maintain a camera surveillance system in operation at all times. In addition , all
 employees involved with the sale of alcohol will be subject to regulatory safety practices
 such as enrolling in an alcohol safety training program offered by the Los Angeles Police
 Department and/or the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
 Restaurants that repeatedly violate the RBP's provisions will be suspended from the
 Program and be required to obtain a CUP to continue to sell alcohol.

 Lastly, the RBP or proposed Ordinance does not authorize any new construction , nor
 result in construction activities that would change the size, height, or other significant
 features of existing buildings and therefore not degrade adjacent properties , the
 surrounding neighborhood, or the public health, welfare, and safety of the public at large.
 Therefore, the RBP, the proposed Ordinance, operations, and other significant features
 will be compatible with and not adversely affect or degrade adjacent properties, the
 surrounding neighborhood, or the public health, welfare, and safety of the mapped
 areas.
4. The RBP will follow good zoning practices by encouraging economic development
 in the areas mapped while limiting the impact of commercial activity on residential
 areas and other sensitive uses through strict provisions.

 The mapped areas are well suited for sit-down restaurants that offer alcohol service,
 which are planned and zoned for commercial uses such as restaurants. This will
 promote livability and convenience for residents and employees , promote a variety of
 uses, and strengthen the employment and amenity base of the mapped areas. As such ,
 the RBP substantially conforms to the purpose, intent, and provisions of the General
 Plan , the applicable community plan, and any specific plan.

 At the same time , the RBP serves the purpose of imposing provisions aimed at limiting
 impacts to surrounding neighbors, including residential areas and other sensitive uses.
 The RBP will only be applicable in specific commercial and manufacturing zones where
 alcohol service is currently allowed through a CUP. In addition , the RBP includes
 numerous operational restrictions related to indoor and outdoor seating , allowed
 activities, and bar-like practices to limit noise and other impacts. Add itional provisions
 concerning operations , security, monitoring, and enforcement are included. Any changes
 to the mode of operations of the restaurant, including hours of operation and seating , will
 not be permitted. Therefore, the RBP will follow good zoning practices by encouraging
 economic development while limiting the impact of commercial activity on nearby
 residential areas and other sensitive uses through strict and enforcing provisions.
 ...........
 •"--'~,
 .....
 _



 L
 North ridge ~

 ~ 2 Sunland




 THIS MAP ESTABLISHES THE
 BOUNDARIES FOR THE AREAS
 OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
 Reseda -·-·· IN WHICH ALL CR, C1 , C1 .5, C2,
 C4, CS, CM, M1 , M2, AND M3 ZONES
 ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE RESTAURANT
 BEVERAGE PROGRAM (RBP - GENERAL).


 Van Nllys




 .. -· North'ttollywood




 Encino
 fil<~• • , ~




 Hollywood

 Brentwood
 Bel Air D

 • "' tfJll•k Wilshire


 Restaurant Beverage Program (RBP) ~
 D RBP- General Eligible • aoo
 -=- 2900 5.800

 •--------,
 Feet
 D '-·


'
 D Community Plan Area
 O.U s....~. o.,.""-"" 01 c.-y P..Mll'lf & l'lu• ...u _. E~-••lftQ
 ' -----
 CF/
 CPC-2018-4660-CA __J
 123021
PLANNING &LAND USE MANAGE~~ o L u T 1 o N
 WHEREAS, the restaurant and hospitality industry is a vitally important part of the City's
economy employing 380,000 and generating more than $200 million in tax revenues to the City prior to
the COVID-19 pandemic; and

 WHEREAS, under the Los Angeles Municipal Code, a restaurant can only be permitted to sale
alcohol by obtaining a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or meeting the eligibility requirements for a
Conditional Use Exception (CUE); and

 WHEREAS, the CUP process can often be time consuming and costly for both applicants and
City staff and resources, hindering entrepreneurs' ability to create or expand their businesses; and

 WHEREAS, very few restaurants are eligible for and have utilized the CUE process; and

 WHEREAS, the City recognizes that the public health and economic impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic, and further appreciates the need to facilitate temporary Zoning Code relief to support the local
economy and livelihood of those living and working in the City; and

 WHEREAS, the City intends to create a new streamlined process known as the Restaurant
Beverage Program for sit-down restaurants only as an alternative to the CUP and CUE process to remove
economic and time constraints and promote economic development; and

 WHEREAS, this ordinance will contain more and stricter standards than those typically imposed
during the CUP or CUE process and require participating restaurants to be subject to enforcement
procedures; and

 WHEREAS, the City has undertaken an environmental review of the proposed provisions and
found that will not have a significant effect on the environment (ENV-2018-4661-ND), and further found
that aspects of the proposed regulatory relief are exempt from environmental review
(ENV-2020-3154-CE); and

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that by the adoption of this Resolution, the Council
hereby activates a new streamlined permitting land use regulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage
Program, that shall be in force and full effect in the geographical boundaries attached in Exhibit A.

 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based on the findings outlined in Exhibit B relative to the
geographic boundaries found in Exhibit A maps, the Restaurant BeveragR am is in confi ity "th
public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice. ) /)

 Presented by: ~
 ~~~~~~~~~->.~~_._~~-




 PA UL KREKORI
 Council
 Mission Hills
 \. Sun Valley




 1
 THIS MAP ESTABLI SHES THE
 BOUNDARIES FOR THE AREAS
 OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
 I
 ~~;,c~M~~,~~2~.!.N~\~3  %NES I
 I
 ARE ELIGIBLE FOR THE RESTAURANT .
 BEVERAGE PROGRAM (RBP · GENERA~
  Van Nuys

 i
 _________...,.,....
 ...._




 _,..,



 l I
 \ Sherman Oaks \
 I
 \
 \




 Bel-Air / .,
 l5

Restaurant Beverage Program (RBP)
C
D
 RBP- General Eligible
 Community Plan Area CPC-2018-4660-CA
 ..,.
 CFI
 --
 2,400 1.200
 f MI




 123021
 EXHIBIT B


1. The Restaurant Beverage Program (RBP) will provide a public necessity within the
 areas mapped in Exhibit A by removing financial barriers for sit-down restaurants
 and promoting economic development, in light of the financial impacts associated
 with the COVID-19 pandemic.

 The restaurant and hospitality industry is an important part of the City's economy,
 employing more than 380,000 people and generating more than $200 million in tax
 revenue to the City during pre-pandemic levels. The proposed Ordinance will preserve
 and strengthen a viable sector of the City's economy by creating the RBP, which will
 reduce the costs and time for sit-down restaurants in the mapped areas to obtain City
 approval to serve alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption , while subjecting them to
 more than 50 provisions. Alcohol service provides a substation portion of restaurants'
 revenue and often make or break their viability as a business, however, restaurants with
 alcohol sales must meet both state and local regulations for serving alcohol. The RBP
 will offer an administrative clearance process to allow the sale of alcohol in sit-down
 restaurants with an operating kitchen and a full menu. In addition, new restaurants with
 alcohol service under the RBP will be subject to enforcement measures and security
 standards. This in-turn will provide long-term financial incentives as it will bolster the
 opening of new restaurants, enable the hiring of new employees, and create more
 vibrant neighborhoods.

 The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent stay-at-home and indoor restrictions have
 presented unprecedented financial challenges to sit-down restaurants throughout the
 City, namely those located within the mapped areas. A simpler, more predictable, less
 costly process to serve alcoholic beverages would ease some of the burdens placed on
 impacted restaurants, giving them a boost and reducing the time needed for them to
 re-open and start hiring people. As such, the RBP will create a service that is beneficial
 to the community, City, and region mapped by reducing the amount of entry barriers for
 new local restaurants.

2. The RBP will provide a public convenience within the areas mapped in Exhibit A
 by accommodating the demand for an amenity that will serve residents, workers,
 employees, and visitors.

 A variety of uses, including sit-down restaurants , are necessary for the conservation,
 development, and success of a vibrant neighborhood. The proposed RBP reflects a shift
 in how the City will process alcohol requests for eligible sit-down restaurants . As such,
 the RBP will provide local sit-down restaurants with a boost, which will allow them to
 open quicker, expand, hire employees, and become an economically viable business. By
 creating a consistent and streamlined review of alcohol requests, the RBP will create
 more vibrant neighborhoods that will benefit employees, local residents, and visitors
 leading to the growth of regulated sit-down restaurants within the mapped areas, which
 are planned and zoned for commercial uses such as restaurants.
- EXHIBIT B



 On-site alcohol service incidental to food service is an amenity that is often expected in
 bona fide sit-down restaurants. The local community, employees, patrons of adjacent
 commercial uses, and the residents in the neighborhood will be able to utilize the
 benefits of having on-site sit-down restaurants and alcohol service nearby. Furthermore,
 the RBP incorporates more than 50 operating standards to ensure that the alcohol
 service will not be disruptive to the community.

 3. The RBP contains more than 50 provisions to ensure that it will not adversely
 affect the welfare of the areas mapped in Exhibit A.

 The RBP's provisions are intended to protect the public health, welfare, and safety of the
 communities within the mapped areas. The City is establishing operational and enforcing
 policies via the RBP to regulate alcohol service in eligible sit-down restaurants.
 Therefore, alcohol service under the RBP must be incidental to food service on-site
 consumption. This means that high-impact uses such as bars, nightclubs, and liquor
 stores will not be eligible under the RBP and must obtain a Conditional Use Permit
 (CUP). Eligible restaurants will not be allowed to have dancing, live entertainment, pool
 tables , and portable bars. Bar-like practices, such as minimum drink purchase,
 admission charges, and age limitations, will also be prohibited.

 Operating standards will ensure that impacts to the community, such as noise, will be
 kept at a minimum. The RBP will prohibit the use of television monitors and speakers in
 outdoor areas. Restaurants will also be required to remove graffiti, clean debris and litter,
 maintain an electronic age verification device, and respond to patron complaints in a
 timely manner. As a means of establishing additional safety policies, the RBP contains
 interior and exterior lighting requirements and will require restaurants to install and
 maintain a camera surveillance system in operation at all times . In addition, all
 employees involved with the sale of alcohol will be subject to regulatory safety practices
 such as enrolling in an alcohol safety training program offered by the Los Angeles Police
 Department and/or the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
 Restaurants that repeatedly violate the RBP's provisions will be suspended from the
 Program and be required to obtain a CUP to continue to sell alcohol.

 Lastly, the RBP or proposed Ordinance does not authorize any new construction, nor
 result in construction activities that would change the size, height, or other significant
 features of existing buildings and therefore not degrade adjacent properties, the
 surrounding neighborhood, or the public health, welfare, and safety of the public at large.
 Therefore, the RBP, the proposed Ordinance, operations, and other significant features
 will be compatible with and not adversely affect or degrade adjacent properties, the
 surrounding neighborhood, or the public health, welfare, and safety of the mapped
 areas.
• EXHIBIT B


 4. The RBP will follow good zoning practices by encouraging economic development
 in the areas mapped while limiting the impact of commercial activity on residential
 areas and other sensitive uses through strict provisions.

 The mapped areas are well suited for sit-down restaurants that offer alcohol service,
 which are planned and zoned for commercial uses such as restaurants. This will
 promote livability and convenience for residents and employees, promote a variety of
 uses, and strengthen the employment and amenity base of the mapped areas. As such,
 the RBP substantially conforms to the purpose, intent, and provisions of the General
 Plan, the applicable community plan, and any specific plan.

 At the same time , the RBP serves the purpose of imposing provisions aimed at limiting
 impacts to surrounding neighbors, including residential areas and other sensitive uses.
 The RBP will only be applicable in specific commercial and manufacturing zones where
 alcohol service is currently allowed through a CUP. In addition, the RBP includes
 numerous operational restrictions related to indoor and outdoor seating, allowed
 activities, and bar-like practices to limit noise and other impacts. Additional provisions
 concerning operations, security, monitoring, and enforcement are included. Any changes
 to the mode of operations of the restaurant, including hours of operation and seating, will
 not be permitted. Therefore, the RBP will follow good zoning practices by encouraging
 economic development while limiting the impact of commercial activity on nearby
 residential areas and other sensitive uses through strict and enforcing provisions.
 PUBLIC WORKS
 MOTION

 On May 26, 2020, the City Council directed the City Engineer to initiate the renaming of Pisani
Place from Venice Blvd to Amoroso Ct to "Orson Bean Way" in commemoration of the veteran actor,
comedian, writer, producer, and beloved member of the Venice community (CF# 20-0641 ).

 Upon further research, the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) detem1ined that this street segment was
vacated and is now legally classified as a private driveway rather than a public street. BOE proposes to
accomplish the renaming via a different process and requires further direction from Council to that effect.

 I THEREFORE MOVE that the City Council direct the City Engineer to rename Pisani Place
from Venice Blvd to Amoroso Ct. to "Orson Bean Way" using the private driveway naming process and
direct the Department of Transportation to erect appropriate sign(s) to this effect at this location.

 I FURTHER MOVE that the City Council direct the Bureau of Engineering to waive any fees
associated with this action.



 PRESENTED BY:

 Councilmember, 11th District



 SECONDED BY:
 RULES, ELECTIONS,INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation,
 rules, regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal governmental
 body or agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with
 the concurrence of the Mayor; and

 WHEREAS , existing law authorizes the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
 Authority (Metro) to provide for a small business preference of five percent of the lowest
 responsible bidder meeting specifications, with respect to contracts in construction, the
 construction component of a design-build team, the procurement of goods, or the delivery of
 services; and

 WHEREAS, existing law also authorizes Metro to establish a subcontracting participation
 goal for small businesses on certain contracts financed with nonfederal funds and to grant a
 preference of five percent to the lowest responsible bidders that meet that goal; and

 WHEREAS, AB 2271 (Gipson), introduced on February 16, 2022, would expand Metro's
 existing contracting preferences and goals to include local businesses;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the
 adoption of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State
 Legislative Program SUPPORT for AB 2271 (Gipson), which would authorize the Los Angeles
 County Metropolitan Transportation Authority to apply the existing five percent small business
 preference participation goal for contracts to local businesses.




 PRESENTED BY: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~




 MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON
 Councilmember, 81h District




MAR l
  mk
 kULtS, tU:CTIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RElATION~
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation,
 rules, regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal governmental
 body or agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with
 the concurrence of the Mayor; and

 WHEREAS, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act provides for the involuntary commitment and
 treatment of a person who is a danger to themselves, others, or who is gravely disabled; and

 WHEREAS, existing law defines "gravely disabled" as a condition in which a person, as a
 result of a mental health disorder, is unable to provide for the basic personal needs of food,
 clothing, or shelter; and

 WHEREAS, under existing law, a person with a mental disability can only be involuntarily
 committed to a conservatorship if they are unable to provide basic personal needs; and

 WHEREAS, AB 2020 (Gallagher) would modify the definition of "gravely disabled" to
 include "a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is incapable of
 making informed decisions about or providing for their own basic personal needs including food,
 clothing, shelter, or medical care without significant supervision and assistance from another
 person and, as a result of being incapable of making these informed decisions, the person is at risk
 of substantial bodily harm, dangerous worsening of a concomitant serious physical illness,
 significant psychiatric deterioration, or mismanagement of essential needs that could result in
 bodily harm"; and

 WHEREAS, the bill seeks to ensure that individuals suffering from serious mental illness,
 especially those who are unable to understand the negative impacts of their illness do not continue
 to deteriorate without the treatment and support they need;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the
 adoption of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State
 Legislative Program SUPPORT for AB 2020 (Gallagher), which would modify the definition of
 "gravely disabled" to read, in part, "a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental health
 disorder, is incapable of making informed decisions about or providing for their own basic personal
 needs ... without significant supervision and assistance from another person and, as a result ... the
 person is at risk of substantial bodily harm ... " ~~ /./1

 PRESENTED BY: v / '""=-
 ~~'b#'---'--t..,,--~~~~~~~


 JO . LE
 Comf ilmep 2•h District

MAR 1 1 2022 SECONDED BY: ~ C.---., •
 xr
 RESOLUTION
 wLtS, tltCf/ONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules, regulations or
 policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal governmental body or agency must first have
 been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with the concurrence of the Mayor; and

 WHEREAS, on March 9, 2022, the Department of Education stated that it has so far identified 100,000
 borrowers who are eligible for student debt cancellation due to the changes the agency made to the Public
 Service Loan Forgiveness program in October of 2021; and

 WHEREAS, the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program cancels the balances of direct loans for eligible
 borrowers who are employed full -time in government or not-for-profit organizations once they've made 120
 monthly qualified payments on loans under qualified repayment plans; and

 WHEREAS , the Program was part of a larger package of education legislation signed into law by President
 George W. Bush in 2007; and

 WHEREAS, the Program created about 15 years ago has only alleviated debt for a very small percentage of
 people who applied had received forgiveness before 2021; and

 WHEREAS, the cancellations for those people are expected to total about $6.2 bil lion in federal student debt
 relief; and

 WHEREAS, the annou ncement marks the latest effort by the Biden administration to make it easier for some
 borrowers to qualify for loan forgiveness under existing programs; and

 WHEREAS, the Biden administration temporarily expanded eligibility tlu-ough Oc tober 31 , 2022, so that the
 program now includes borrowers who had loans that didn't originally qualify; and

 WHEREAS, with the pandemic and recent increase in cost of living, the City must identify creative economic
 solutions that contribute to a fair and more resilient economy that can bounce back after the unimaginable
 impacts from the COVID- 19 pandemic; and

 WHEREAS , with the latest effort by the Education Department to provide relief for borrowers burdened with
 billions of dollars in student loan debt, the City's Youth Development Department (YDD) w ill provide
 financial management tools and literacy for those students saddled with debt; and

 WHEREAS, the City's YDD wi ll be a key instrument in providing these financial management resources and
 tools for Angeleno youth , marking the depa11ment's purpose towards coordinating and housing youth related
 resources ;

 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the adoption of this
 Reso lution, the City of Los Angeles hereby commends the recent shift in the Public Service Loan Forgivene~=-""~
 Program which strengthens advocacy for student debt forgiveness and reform.


/ 'I ,,..,..---'
/}/" Councilwoman, 7th District -...

 NAR ! 1 2022·
 SECONDED BY: ~~
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules,
regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal goverrunental body or agency
must have first been adopted in the fonn of a Resolution by the City Council with the concurrence of the
Mayor; and

 WHEREAS, begilU1ing in December 2020, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health
enlisted community COVID-19 vaccination support from Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that
were approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and California Department of Public
Health; and

 WHEREAS, PQHCs constitute the County's local COVID-19 vaccination network, are uniquely
located in areas of high need, and provide urgent and dire care to the County's most vulnerable populations,
including people experiencing homelessness, migrant workers, and underserved families and children; and

 WHEREAS, FQHCs provide extensive COVID-19 vaccination services, including large-scale
vaccination points of distribution for their immediate communities, sector-driven outreach for essential
service workers, and school-based testing and vaccination clinics; and

 \\TJIEREAS. FQHCs arc essential service providers to the communities most in need during the
COVID-19 pandemic and the backbone of COVID-19 vaccination efforts in low-income neighborhoods
throughout the County; and

 WHEREAS, the Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County (CCALAC) reported that
FQIICs have not yet received Medi-Cal reimbursement payments for COVID-19 vaccinations administered
to Medi-Cal patients since January 2021; and

 WHEREAS, Medi-Cal is a program administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services and the California Department of Health Care Services that offers low-cost or free health insurance
to low-income Californians; and

 WHEREAS, CCALAC estimates that FQHCs may be owed tens of millions in reimbursement
dollars for vaccine administration to Medi-Cal patients since January 2021 ; and

 WHEREAS, non-payment and reimbursement delays will constrain the ability of FQHCs lo
provide essential health services during the ongoing pandemic and the County's continued, essential
CO V ID-19 vaccination effort;

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with concun-ence of the Mayor, that by adoption of this
Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-22 Federal Legislative Program SUPPORT
and/or SPONSORSHfP of any legislation or administrative action that would expeditiously resolve
pending, federally funded Medi-Cal reimbursement payments to Federally Qualified Health Centers for
COVID-19 vaccination administration.
 ~

 PRESENTED BY: ~7-.._ LJ ,~
 . <JC
 ~AR.RELL
 Councilrnember, 13th District "


 MAR 11 2022 SECONDEDBY:~ µ
 ,{ULL~, l:U:C IKA%, IN I~~<GOVckNMENTAL RELATIONS
 RESOLUTION

 WHEREAS, any official position of the City of Los Angeles with respect to legislation, rules,
regulations or policies proposed to or pending before a local, state or federal governmental body or
agency must have first been adopted in the form of a Resolution by the City Council with the concurrence
of the Mayor; and

 WHEREAS, the average price for a gallon of gas in California is the nation's highest at $5.44,
according to AAA - a number that is likely to increase after President Joe Biden banned Russian oil
imports on Tuesday in response to the country's invasion of Ukraine; and

 WHEREAS, California's high gas prices are partly because of taxes as well as regulatory
programs aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emission. Together, they added about $1 .27 to the cost of a
gallon of gas just last month; and

 WHEREAS , this increase is being felt by all, but particularly by low income households who are
least able to absorb sudden spikes in gas prices. For these families, cutting back on car use is not an
option and gasoline is an essential good.

 WHEREAS, in January 2022 , California Governor Gavin Newsom proposed to suspend the 5.6%
gas tax increase scheduled to take effect in July, but leaders in the State Legislature have yet to agree
over concerns on losing $500 million or more of gas tax revenue; and

 WHEREAS , Governor Newsom told Californians, during his State of the State Address, that he
was working on a potential rebate to offset the escalating costs of gas as prices broke historic records
across the county this week; and

 WHEREAS, representatives in Sacramento have introduced legislation and are calling for the
immediate implementation of a six month "gas tax moratorium" and have urged their colleagues to use
the State's estimated $60 billion surplus to pay for the transportation infrastructure projects normally
covered by the gas tax; and

 WHEREAS, budget experts have noted that such a proposal could work if state budget surplus
funds are utilized and state officials should pursue all options to provide economic relief for citizens at the
pump .

 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, with the concurrence of the Mayor, that by the adoption
of this Resolution, the City of Los Angeles hereby includes in its 2021-2022 State Legislative Program
SPONSORSHIP and/or SUPPORT of legislation and/or administrative action, which would significantly
lower the price per gallon of gas in the State of California.



 PRESENTED BY
 J
 ~ S. LEE