Water, Sewer and Solid Waste Committee — Fayetteville, AR
Date: 2025-10-14
Time: 17:30

Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Committee
 14 October 2025
 5:30 P.M. City Hall Room 101
 (Or immediately following City Council Agenda Session)

Committee: Council Member Teresa Turk, Council Member Mike Wiederkehr, Council
 Member Scott Berna, Council Member Bob Stafford

Copy to: Mayor Molly Rawn, Keith Macedo, Steve Dotson, Kara Paxton, Kit Williams, Chris
 Brown, Alan Pugh, Jonathan Curth, Terry Gulley, Peter Nierengarten, Brian Pugh,
 Corey Granderson, Drake Vineyard, Aaron Watkins, Cody Ashworth, Scott
 Murphy, Brian Rowland, Stephen Jeffus, Jim Jenks

From: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director
______________________________________________________________________

CALL TO ORDER

UPDATES

PRESENTATIONS:


1. Overview of September’s WRRF Monthly Operations
Scott Murphy – WRRF Project Manager, Inframark


2. Overview of September’s Water & Sewer Operations
Tim Nyander – Utilities Director


OLD BUSINESS:


3. Water & Sewer Rate Study and Impact Fee Study Update
 Stephen Dotson – Chief Financial Officer

INFORMATION ONLY


4. West Transmission Waterline Update
Corey Granderson – Utilities Engineer

INFORMATION ONLY




1
NEW BUSINESS:


5. Waterline Condition Assessments – Engineering Amendment with RJN Group
In response to historical failures on aging large-diameter waterlines in the Fayetteville system,
the West Transmission Main project was expedited to install a critical third feed of treated water
from Beaver Water District to Fayetteville. One goal of that project was to allow critical shut-
downs and repairs on other water transmission lines that currently cannot be taken out of
service due to demands for water usage in the system.

Construction is progressing on-time and on-budget for the West Transmission line to be
operational by Summer 2026. During this time, desktop review and planning for condition
assessments of other aging large diameter waterlines has been underway with RJN Group
(Resolution 245-24; October 1, 2024). This initial scope has identified the highest critical water
transmission mains that should be targeted for field testing and data collection using various
technologies. The proposed amendment with RJN Group will provide for ‘smart-ball’ inspection
of the 36-inch diameter waterline from Beaver Water District (approximately 9.8 miles) as well
as vibroacoustic inspection of approximately 8.7 miles of additional aging waterlines in town with
diameters from 24-inch to 30-inch.

The aim of these inspections is to further refine the areas of highest risk in our water
transmission mains so that targeted repairs, rehabilitation, and replacements can proceed in the
most cost-effective manner. The proposed contract amendment will allow for final planning, field
coordination, preparation, and deployment of each scanning technology. It will also provide the
subsequent detailed data analysis, reports, and recommendations for repair, rehab, and/or
replacements along these alignments. Furthermore, a contingency is built into the fee to allow
flexibility for additional field scans or other data collection if determined to be beneficial for the
project to give actionable results. For example, if large portions of the 36-inch waterline from
Beaver Water District are determined to have significant wall-loss using the ‘smart-ball’
technology, the team may elect to further investigate this line with additional deployment of the
vibroacoustic analysis. Having contingency allows the project to only deploy the secondary
scans in most-critical areas, thereby reducing scope and cost.

The existing contract was able to omit soil testing that was originally scoped for a savings of
$44,000 that will be applied towards Amendment 1 items. Therefore, the net contract increases
for these services, including a $120,000 contingency is $890,113.00. Staff recommends
approval of Amendment 1 to the Engineering Services Agreement with RJN Group for waterline
condition assessments.

STAFF REQUESTS THIS BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION
FOR APPROVAL


6. Environmental Consulting Operations, Inc. (ECO) Amendment No. 12
Discussion of Amendment No. 12 to the contract with Environmental Consulting Operations, Inc.
in the amount of $63,500.00 for wetlands mitigation site monitoring and management for
Woolsey Wet Prairie in 2026. The 2026 "Not to Exceed" cost of $63,500.00 represents a 6.6%
decrease to the contract amount that was approved by the City Council for 2025.




 2
 Fee
 Amendment No. 12 ECO Scope of Services Estimate
 Part A - 2026 Project Administration & Management $4,000.00
 Part B - 2026 Annual Ecological Restoration Monitoring $25,000.00
 Part C - 2026 Annual Adaptive Management Strategy $32,000.00
 Part D - 2026 Update Surplus Wetland Credit Tracking
 Ledger $0.00
 Part E - 2026 Academic Research Project Guidance $2,500.00
 Total $63,500.00


STAFF REQUESTS THIS BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION
FOR APPROVAL


PRESENTATIONS


September’s WRRF Report
September’s Water & Sewer Operations Report


ATTACHMENTS


September’s WRRF Monthly Report
September’s Water & Sewer Operations Report
Amendment No.1 RJN Group
ECO Amendment No. 12


ADJOURN
Next Water, Sewer, Solid Waste Committee meets on
Tuesday, November 11th, 2025, at 5:30 p.m.




 3
Inframark Monthly Report

 September 2025
2




 Table of Contents

 Contents
 Inframark Monthly Report .............................................................................................. 1
 September 2025 ........................................................................................................... 1
 Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 3
 Compliance .................................................................................................................. 4
 Financial ...................................................................................................................... 5
 Hamestring .................................................................................................................. 6
 Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 7
 Pretreatment ................................................................................................................ 8
 Biosolids Management .................................................................................................. 9
 Appendix .................................................................................................................... 12




 2|Page
3




 Executive Summary

 1. Hamestring Lift Station:
  Seal fail resulted in the flooding of the dry well and the systematic removal
 and service of the pumps
 2. Noland Flow:
  Recent storms resulted in record flows at Noland (41MGD)
 3. Infiltration and Inflow:
  Drainage basin smoke testing and inspection tentatively set for November
 4. Woolsey Wet Prairie:
  Focus on control of Reed Canary grass and Carpet Grass
 5. BMS:
  $22,000 in income from Hay, Fertilizer, and WTR
 6. Training:
  LO/TO
  Hazard Recognition
 7. Industrial Pretreatment:
  Over $220,000 in surcharges for September
 8. Financial:
  Project is approximately $650,000 under budget for the year
 9. Personnel:
  One termination for Drug Policy violation




 3|Page
4




 Compliance

 Paul R Noland:
 The Paul R Noland facility achieved perfect permit compliance for August 2025:



 Westside:
 The Westside facility achieved perfect permit compliance for August 2025

 Biosolids Management Site (BMS):
 No effluent from Noland was been used to irrigate at BMS due to sufficient rainfall



 Sanitary Sewer Overﬂows (SSOs):
 1- September 23, 2025 Hamestring Lift Station 10,000gal




 4|Page
5




 Financial
 The Project continues to be well under budget for both the Maintenance and Chemical
 Rebateable accounts.
 Cap Summary as of September 2025
 Contract % of
 Monthly YTD
 Cap Type Project Site Monthly Expenses Annual Budget YTD Expenses YTD Balance Months Contract
 Budget Spend %
 Passed  Year
 Maintenance FAYETV $ 28,998.83 $ 46,011.27 $ 347,986.01 $ 212,770.06 $ 135,215.95 9 75% 61%
 Maintenance FYTNLD $ 61,923.31 $ 87,107.59 $ 743,079.72 $ 298,061.07 $ 445,018.65 9 75% 40%
 Maintenance FYTWSD $ 17,413.59 $ 6,437.17 $ 208,963.11 $ 37,742.55 $ 171,220.56 9 75% 18%
 Maintenance FYTLAB $ 8,169.04 $ - $ 98,028.42 $ 710.54 $ 97,317.88 9 75% 1%
 Maintenance FYTLSM $ 12,661.89 $ 13,089.34 $ 151,942.74 $ 16,620.85 $ 135,321.89 9 75% 11%
 Total M&R $ 129,166.66 $ 152,645.37 $1,550,000.00 $ 565,905.07 $ 984,094.93 9 75% 37%
 Chemical FAYETV $ 8,419.02 $ 1,016.06 $ 101,028.20 $ 5,973.57 $ 95,054.63 9 75% 6%
 Chemical FYTNLD $ 17,977.74 $ 45,097.76 $ 215,732.82 $ 286,125.73 $ (70,392.91) 9 75% 133%
 Chemical FYTWSD $ 5,055.56 $ 4,286.84 $ 60,666.71 $ 22,289.81 $ 38,376.90 9 75% 37%
 Chemical FYTLAB $ 2,371.66 $ - $ 28,459.86 $ 100.00 $ 28,359.86 9 75% 0%
 Chemical FYTLSM $ 3,676.03 $ - $ 44,112.41 $ 10,309.75 $ 33,802.66 9 75% 23%
 Total Chemical $ 37,500.01 $ 50,400.66 $ 450,000.00 $ 324,798.86 $ 125,201.14 9 75% 72%




 Notable Expenses:

 1- $11,106.74 Bypass pump rentals
 2- $5418.30 Transfer switch repair Westside
 3- $10,783.82 New Air Conditioner for the Noland Laboratory
 4- $3936.11 New motor for LS18
 5- $5394.68 Transfer switch repair Hamestring
 6- $31,940 Oxygen for Noland ozone disinfection




 5|Page
6




 Hamestring
 On Sunday, September 28th at approximately 1:00am, the
 impeller on pump number 4 split/cracked during
 operation resulting in a seal fail on the pump. Within
 hours, several feet of water accumulated in the dry well
 of the station. The pump was isolated to stop the flow
 and the dry well pumped down over the next several
 hours. Maintenance and Operations staff have since
 removed each motor sequentially to be dried and
 serviced by local shops. As of this report, pumps
 2,3,5,and 7 have been returned to service while we wait
 on parts (new impellers and wear rings) for the remaining
 pumps. In order to reduce the potential for recurrence,
 larger sump pumps are being installed, water level
 alarms are being reconfigured to call out on SCADA, and an annual PM has been added to
 inspect and service each impeller and volute.




 6|Page
7




 Maintenance
 During a recent thunderstorm, lift station 56 (West Fork)
 received a lightning strike that caused considerable
 damage to the electrical equipment at the site. The
 breakers and variable frequency drives for pumps 2 and 3
 were melted resulting in the loss of pumping capacity for
 our 2 largest pumps (100hp each). A bypass pump was
 immediately ordered and installed to prevent sewer
 overﬂows and remains in place as of this report. Once the
 City of West Fork completes their insurance claim, our
 staff will replace the damaged equipment and return the
 station to full operation.




 7|Page
8




 Pretreatment

 For the month of September, surcharges for Tyson foods were considerably higher than any
 other month so far this year. The previous highest monthly charge was $106,535.23

 Industrial Surcharges
 TSS
 Industry Flow(MG) (mg/l) BOD(mg) Surcharge
 Tyson Foods Inc. 6.837 2592.5 2292.5  $202,861.88
 Hiland Dairy 1.678 1876 1576 $17,608.73
 Total $220,470.61




 Septic Charges Elkins BOD Loadings
 Hauler Loads Charges Influent Organic
 BOD
 AR Portables 36 $1,800 Loading Loading
 Month Lbs. % of Design
 Best Jet 10 $500
 ABC Quick Dec-24 10897 36.7
 Pump 4 $200 Jan-25 12152 41
 Feb-25 13180 44.4
 Total $2,500
 Mar-25 12501 42.1
 Apr-25 23277 78.5
 May-25 10531 35.5
 Jun-25 12231 41.2
 Jul-25 15282 51.5
 Aug-25 15523 52.3
 Sep-25 13844 46.7
 Oct-25
 Nov-25
 Dec-25




 8|Page
9




 Biosolids Management

 Hay, fertilizer, and WTR sales were up again for the month of September.

 Water Treatment Res., Hay, and Fertilizer Sales:
 August Sales Weight Customer Amount
 Fertilizer 6.91 Bill Love 138.20
 7.45 Bill Love 149.00
 9.69 Bill Love 193.80
 3.11 JB Smith 62.20
 15.35 JB Smith 307.00
 Hay 50.02 David Jackson 3751.50
 WTR 15.50 Beaver Water District 503.75
 12.80 Beaver Water District 416.00
 12.54 Beaver Water District 407.55
 11.64 Beaver Water District 378.30
 11.25 Beaver Water District 365.63
 15.25 Beaver Water District 495.63
 13.09 Beaver Water District 425.43
 11.01 Beaver Water District 357.83
 14.23 Beaver Water District 462.48
 19.05 Beaver Water District 619.13
 17.62 Beaver Water District 572.65
 17.55 Beaver Water District 570.38
 17.61 Beaver Water District 572.33
 19.45 Beaver Water District 632.13
 18.22 Beaver Water District 592.15
 17.98 Beaver Water District 584.35
 16.93 Beaver Water District 550.23
 18.11 Beaver Water District 588.58
 17.72 Beaver Water District 575.90
 17.87 Beaver Water District 580.78
 17.67 Beaver Water District 574.28
 16.94 Beaver Water District 550.55
 16.75 Beaver Water District 544.38


 9|Page
10




 16.86 Beaver Water District 547.95
 17.62 Beaver Water District 572.65
 12.64 Beaver Water District 410.80
 11.88 Beaver Water District 386.10
 13.68 Beaver Water District 444.60
 12.63 Beaver Water District 410.48



 $20,455.93




 Hay Production:
 For September, growing conditions remained favorable, however, an army
 worm infestation reduced the hay quality on several of our ﬁelds. On advice
 from the County Extension Office, we have applied insecticide to control the
 worms, but hay production must be halted for several weeks to prevent
 toxicity issues.




 Woolsey Wet Prairie
 Below is a summary of our applications for the month:

 September: mostly lespedeza, reed canary grass, and carpet grass
 W2- spot sprayed 10 gallons of sulfo-sulfuron for Reed Canary grass control
 W2- manually removed over 100 seed heads from Reed Canary grass to prevent spread




 10 | P a g e
11




 Noteworthy Events

 On September 9th, Inframark hosted a cookout at
 the Westside Treatment Facility to show
 appreciation for our staff and City personnel.
 Over 75 people attended the event.




 11 | P a g e
12




 Appendix




 12 | P a g e
13




 Inframark Compliance Monthly Report
 Meeting
 Project: Fayetteville, AR
 Date:
 Report September
 Facility: Noland WRRF
 Date: 2025


 Attending:


 Permit
 Compliance
 Monthly Actual Percent
 Parameter Monthly Limit Comments
 Available
 White River Flow, MGD 6.81
 Effluent D.O., mg/L 15.05 11.00 37
 Effluent pH max, S.U. 7.6 9.0 15
 Effluent pH min, S.U. 7.5 6.0 25
 Effluent Fecal Coliform, 48 200 76
 MPN
 Effluent Ammonia, mg/L 0.07 0.5 86
 Effluent Ammonia, lbs./ day 4.2 53 92
 Effluent T-Phos, mg/L 0.19 1.0 81
 Effluent T-Phos, lbs./ day 10.42 105 90
 Effluent CBOD, mg/L 3.0 5.7 47
 Effluent CBOD, lbs./ day 162 599 73
 Effluent TSS, mg/L 1.4 5.0 72
 Effluent TSS, lbs./ day 75 525 86
 Effluent TDS, mg/L 298 500 40
 Effluent TDS, lbs./ day 15,783 52,542 70
 Effluent Sulfate, mg/L 45 119 62
 Effluent Sulfate, lbs./ day 2,601 12,505 79
 Effluent Nitrates, mg/L 6.4 Report
 Effluent Nitrates, lbs./ day 370 Report


 Influent Parameters Value Comments
 Influent Flow, MGD 7.48
 Influent BOD, lbs./ day 13,844
 Influent TSS, lbs./ day 12,907
 Influent Ammonia, lbs./ day 1,153
 Influent T-Phos, lbs./ day 233




 13 | P a g e
14




 Inframark Compliance Monthly Report
 Meeting Fayetteville,
 Project:
 Date: AR
 September 2025 West Side
 Report Date: Facility:
 WWRF




 Attending:


 Permit
 Compliance
 Monthly Monthly Percent
 Parameter Comments
 Actual Limit Available
 GC Discharge, MGD 10.72
 Effluent D.O., mg/L 8.80 6.90 27.54
 Effluent pH, min. S.U. 7.21 6.00 20.17
 Effluent pH, max. S.U. 7.79 9.00 13.44
 Effluent Fecal Coliform, MPN 30.45 200.00 84.77
 Effluent CBOD, mg/L 1.98 5.30 62.69
 Effluent CBOD, lbs./ day 180.70 442.00 59.12
 Effluent TSS, mg/L 1.16 10.00 88.43
 Effluent TSS, lbs./ day 107.43 834.00 87.12
 Effluent Ammonia, mg/L 0.06 1.00 94.15
 Effluent Ammonia, lbs./ day 5.65 83.40 93.22
 Effluent T-Phos, mg/L 0.18 1.00 81.78
 Effluent T-Phos, lbs./ day 15.27 83.40 81.69
 Effluent Nitrate, mg/L 4.24 Possible Permit Limit Pending




 Influent Parameters Value Comments
 Influent Flow, MGD 10.7
 Influent BOD lbs./ day 10,758.3
 Influent TSS lbs./ day 13,844.0
 Influent Ammonia lbs./ day 1,357.2
 Influent T-Phos, lbs./ day 298.1




 14 | P a g e
WATER/SEWER/METER
OPERATIONS REPORT
 September 2025
 WATER
 71 work orders for distribution
  system maintenance completed.
 32 hydrants repaired.
 60 after-hours calls.




 8” repair on North Independence Place.
2” main repair utilizing
hydro excavation (left)
and a leaking service
saddle being replaced
(right).
Water main repair on top of
Stone Mountain on East
Crestline Place. This line
was deep and required a
large excavation!
CONSTRUCTION
 14 new service water and sewer taps
 68 polyethylene services replaced; primarily on the
  east side of Fayetteville in the S Woodsprings area.
SEWER
 53, 457 feet of sewer mains washed.
 29,644 feet of sewer main inspected via CCTV.
 4 point repairs on sewer mains.
 4,938 feet of sewer main inspected via smoke testing.
 1 after-hours call.
METER AND OTHER
SERVICES
  853 cellular meters installed
  11,025 feet of water transmission
 main easement cleared
  15 after-hours calls




 Easement near Van Asche
 that was cleared.
YEAR TO DATE
STATISTICS
 Water distribution system work orders completed – 887
 Hydrants repaired – 63
 Polyethylene water service lines replaced – 467
 New service water/sewer taps – 146
 Sewer mains washed/jetted – 727,782 feet
 Sewer mains inspected via CCTV – 259,110
 Point repairs on sewer mains – 60
 Total cellular meters in the system – 28,587
We conduct a group study
session on Wednesday
mornings. These study sessions
are designed to help our
employees pass their Water
Distribution
Operator exams. This gives an
avenue for progression and
promotion.
 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
 FOR
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
 WITH
 RJN GROUP. INC.




In accordance with the AGREEMENT for Professional Engineering Services dated October 1,
2024, between the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas (hereinafter called OWNER) and RJN GROUP,
INC. (hereinafter called ENGINEER), OWNER hereby authorizes ENGINEER to proceed with the
following services:

 Section I - Project Description

Under the AGREEMENT, the OWNER retained RJN Group to provide professional engineering
services. The Project involved planning, ascertaining methods of inspection, determining the level
of effort, and developing cost estimates for assessing the condition of thirteen sections of critical
waterlines, totaling approximately 47.3 miles of pipes. It has since been determined that
additional services will be needed. Specifically, the additional services consist of certain condition
assessment tasks, for certain waterlines, stemming from recommendations generated in the
original scope of work.

 Section II - Scope

The ENGINEER shall perform professional services utilizing the procedures identified in the
original Scope of the AGREEMENT and as described in Exhibit A herein.

 Section III - Time of Service

ENGINEER will proceed with providing the services set forth herein immediately upon execution
of this Authorization and as described in Exhibit B herein.

 Section IV - Compensation

OWNER shall compensate ENGINEER for providing these additional services a total sum not-to-
exceed $890,113.00, as provided in the Compensation Table (Exhibit C) herein provided.

All prices will remain firm for the initial term of the Agreement period. Any de-
escalation/escalation in prices will be made on an annual basis thereafter at the sole discretion of


DCN: OP-CON-02-20-R2 Page 1 of 16 R1605-CAC
the OWNER. Requests for price adjustments must be made by the ENGINEER in writing at least
60 days in advance. The baseline for determining price adjustments will be based upon the closing
date of the solicitation. All requests for price increase or decrease are subject to review and
approval by the ENGINEER. The maximum increase will have a ceiling of 10% annually and a net
decrease of 10% annually. Changes in prices shall be based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Employment Cost Index, average increase or decrease for the most recent calendar year (see
http://www.bls.gov/ECI; update with the appropriate ECI Index, CIU1010000100000A and
Management, Professional, and Related).
In consideration of the mutual covenants and Agreements herein contained, the OWNER and
ENGINEER stipulate and agree that the Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated
October 1, 2024, is hereby amended as described in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and made
part of this agreement.

All other provisions of the original Agreement remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed this
 day of ,20 .



 AUTHORIZED BY:
 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, Arkansas

 By: ___________________________________________________

 Name: _______________________________________________

 Title: _________________________________________________

 Date: _________________________________________________

ACCEPTED BY:
RJN Group, Inc.

By: ___________________________________________

Name: _______________________________________
 Daniel Jackson

Title: Sr. Vice President
 _________________________________________

Date: October 8, 2025
 _________________________________________




END OF AMENDMENT
 EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES

RJN is proposing the following scope of services for the Water Main Assessment for the City of
Fayetteville.

 A. Project Management and Meetings

 1. Provide project management services including invoicing, scope, schedule, and fee
 tracking, and closeout services.
 2. Provide monthly updates to City staff through the duration of the project.
 3. Meet with City staff as necessary to discuss progress of the project.

 B. Pipeline Section 2

 1. Preparatory Work, Data Review, and Planning
 a. Conduct a kickoff meeting with the City to discuss the project.
 b. Finalize determination of Pipers® launch and retrieval locations.
 c. Perform mock deployment planning. This may include planning for
 strategies/provisions such as a “dummy” Pipers multi-sensor, a clamp-on
 flowmeter, and/or other measures to finalize the preparation of the Pipers
 deployment and ensure its success.
 d. Prepare for a field planning visit.
 e. INGU Data Preparation
 i. Kickoff Meeting – RJN and INGU
 ii. INGU Deliverables
 iii. KMZ File of Water Main Paths
 1. Mapping grade locates
 2. Excel Elevation Profile(s)
 3. Questionnaire(s)
 2. Field Reconnaissance Visits and Equipment Preparation
 a. Meet with City staff on-site for site visit inspections. During visit, discuss any
 questions that arose during the data review process.
 b. Observe pump operations and take steps to measure travel time.
 c. Field assessment:
 i. Observe valve exercising by City staff to confirm operation, if possible.
 ii. Finalize methodology for inserting and catching Pipers.
 d. Discuss results of preliminary assessment with City.
 e. Following installation of valved taps by City, provide equipment and personnel to
 perform internal inspection of the water main and retrieval of the inspection
 tools. Customize catching devices as necessary.
 3. Internal Inspections
 a. Contract with INGU on the rental of Pipers multi-sensors.
 b. Work with the City to assist in the Pipers launching.
 c. Perform up to three Pipers deployments, with a minimum of two successful
 capture and retrievals. Being that the Pipers ball is carried through the pipeline
 with the flow of water, the duration of time it stays within the pipeline is a
 function of the water velocity. We understand from the City that typical
 velocities in this pipeline are 2.5 fps to 3.7 fps. Thus the Pipers ball would likely
 need to stay in this pipeline for approximately four hours per deployment.
4. Data Evaluation and Technical Memorandum (TM)
 a. Review and analyze inspection results and recommendations.
 i. Pipers’ technology includes the following results:
 1. Acoustic leak detection
 2. Air and gas pocket detection
 3. High resolution pressure sensing
 4. Deposit, debris, and blockage locating
 5. Magnetometer survey to detect variations in bulk wall thickness
 and internal corrosion, with a minimum wall loss threshold of
 30%. The Pipers ball will ONLY be able to state “yes/no” for wall
 loss of 30% or greater at all points along the pipe. It does not
 give precise info about wall loss. (Pipes having wall losses of 30-
 45% can be considered to be in “marginal” condition; beyond
 45%, they can be considered to be in “distressed” condition.)
 The Pipers ball uses microelectromechanical systems (MEMS)
 magnetometers to measure the passive magnetic field within
 ferromagnetic pipelines. Metal loss has a significant impact on the
 magnetic structure of the pipeline, thereby influencing the passive
 magnetic field detected by the Pipers ball. Research has shown
 that metal loss features with a minimum depth of 30% of the
 nominal wall thickness consistently reduce axial and radial magnetic
 flux density (MFD). The average total MFD within each pipe
 segment is calculated and compared with the average total MFD of
 the parent pipeline. If the disparity exceeds an empirically
 determined threshold, the pipe segment is flagged as a potential
 candidate for containing a “metal loss” anomaly with a depth
 exceeding 30% of the nominal wall thickness.
 b. Include a summary of the work completed and results of the internal screening.
 c. Prepare a GIS map of the water main system, including findings from the site
 inspections, document review, and internal screening.
 d. Provide recommendations for further inspections, rehabilitation/repair, and/or
 maintenance of the water main. “Recommendations for further inspection”, if
 any, would likely entail Broadband Electro-Magnetic (BEM) inspection. This
 would likely be recommended in certain areas if Pipers detects wall loss of at
 least 30%.
 The BEM assessment is a non-destructive testing method of measuring wall
 thickness. Wall conditions are recorded along the area at which the hand scanning
 tool is placed. These recordings are converted using software and a calibration
 database to develop an apparent wall thickness. The original pipe wall thickness
 (“reference wall thickness”) is determined using industry handbook information
 that was current at the time the pipeline was constructed. Subtracting the
 measured wall thickness from the reference wall thickness yields a determination
 of wall loss. Although the BEM assessment can detect where internal and/or
 external wall loss has occurred, it cannot distinguish between internal and external
 wall loss.
 Compared with Pipers, the BEM would provide much more precise wall loss data
 at the point(s) where it is applied on the excavated pipe.
 It would also be appropriate during BEM inspection to make use of the excavated
 trench and perform soil corrosivity testing and visual inspection of the external
 pipe wall. The BEM and related tasks constitute the “Step 2” Condition Assessment
 action presented in the Water Line Condition Assessment Planning & Prep Report;
 “Step 2” would likely cost approximately 80% of the Pipers work (“Step 1”)
 proposed herein. This is based on the assumption that ten BEM excavations would
 be conducted for Pipeline Section 2.
 e. Include budgetary pricing and recommended timing (urgency) for
 implementation of recommendations.
 f. Technical Memorandum (TM) Submittal:
 i. Provide a digital draft of TM,
 ii. Revise draft based on City comments and submit a digital and two hard
 copies (if desired) of final TM.
 iii. Provide digital copies of all data, results, and photographs from
 inspections.
 iv. Submit a digital and two hard copies (if desired).

C. Pipeline Sections 7, 8, 9A and 12

RJN is proposing the following scope of services for the “Advanced Vibroacoustic Analysis”
(AVA) Condition Assessments: Water Transmission Pipeline Sections 7, 8, 9A, 12” project in
the City of Fayetteville:

1. Preparatory Work & Data Review
 a. Conduct a kickoff meeting with the City to discuss the project scope, objectives,
 roles, and establish lines of communication for the duration of the work.
 b. Discuss project approach, schedule of work, and set expectations for the project.
 c. Share follow-up questions with the City for discussion.
 d. Visit the project area and investigate the access points.
 e. Prepare a confirmation list for the City to check accessibility to fire hydrants,
 valves, and vaults to meet project objectives.
 f. Ensure selected sites are acceptable and provide suitable locations concerning
 safety and equipment performance, adjust segment plans accordingly based on
 access availability and site conditions.
2. AVA powered by DRI™ Inspections
3. Provide all necessary AVA inspection equipment and a three-to-four-person crew to
 complete field work.
 a. Use external vibroacoustic sensors and data acquisition units at predefined
 access points (e.g., hydrants, valves, or hydro-excavated “potholes”) along each
 pipeline segment to enable AVA testing.
 b. Introduce Vibroacoustic signals into the water column using a centrally
 positioned wave generator between the sensors to excite the pipeline and
 capture its dynamic response. (AVA instrumentation contacts the metallic
 pipe/appurtenances, but does not contact the water column directly.)
 c. Measure the distance between access points to ensure appropriate resolution
 and segment coverage.
 d. Perform on-site and remote QA/QC of field data before demobilization to confirm
 data integrity.
4. Data Analysis, Report and Recommendations
 a. Determine if any leaks are present on the testing segments and inform the City
 of the location within three working days.
 b. Post-process the inspection data to assess localized pipe wall stiffness and
 identify structural anomalies using both time and frequency domain analyses.
 Correlate wall stiffness to wall loss averaged over the available resolution length.
 Post-inspection analysis in the time-frequency domain identifies and locates leaks
 and pipe wall distress and reports residual wall thickness for most iron pipes with
 a resolution of 20 to 30 feet, when access points are spaced at 1,000 feet or
 less. This capability will ensure that sub pipe stick levels defects are both
 detected and located, not lost in an average result over a longer resolution
 length.
 The AVA/Kenwave analysis is such that average pipe wall loss over the resolution
 length (20 to 30 feet) can be calculated to quantify and characterize wall loss as
 follows: “Good (Less than 5%)”, “Satisfactory (5% to 20%)”, “Sufficient (20% to
 30%)”, “Marginal (30% to 40%)”, or “Distressed (Greater than 40%)”. We will
 use the calculated wall loss data and follow AWWA M28 guidelines to craft a
 recommended scope of improvements.
 c. Include a summary of the work completed and results of the AVA inspections
 delivered in a draft report including:
 i. A GIS map of the water main system, including findings from the AVA
 inspections.
 ii. Engineering recommendations for further inspections,
 rehabilitation/repair, and/or maintenance based on the inspection data.
 “Recommendations for further inspection”, if any, would likely entail
 Broadband Electro-Magnetic (BEM) inspection. This would likely be
 recommended in certain areas if AVA detects significant wall loss. While
 AVA provides precise wall loss data averaged across the entire
 circumference of the pipe along a resolution segment, BEM provides
 precise wall loss data at the exact point(s) on the pipe circumference
 where it is applied on the excavated pipe. It would also be appropriate
 during BEM inspection to make use of the excavated trench and perform
 soil corrosivity testing and visual inspection of the external pipe wall. The
 BEM and related tasks constitute the “Step 2” Condition Assessment
 action presented in the Water Line Condition Assessment Planning & Prep
 Report; “Step 2” would likely cost approximately 20% of the AVA work
 (“Step 1”) proposed herein. This is based on the assumption that four
 BEM excavations would be conducted for Pipeline Section 9A and two
 each would be conducted for Pipeline Sections 7, 8, and 12.
 iii. Budgetary pricing and recommended timing (urgency) for implementation
 of recommendations.
 d. Meet with City Staff to discuss findings and recommendations and revise draft
 accordingly.
 e. Submit a digital and two hard copies (if desired) of the final report. The basic
 inspection deliverable includes a condition assessment report with residual wall
 thickness, identified leaks, location of both leaks and pipe wall distress along the
 inspected watermain, and structural integrity grading 1-3 based on percent wall
 loss with supporting Excel tables and color-coded GIS shapefile.
 The report will include recommendations based on these findings. The
 recommendations may entail some combination of additional analysis (likely
 consisting of BEM and related tasks, as described above), repairs, rehabilitation,
 and/or replacements; all identified at specific portions of the pipeline.
 f. Provide digital copies of all inspection data, analysis results, and photographs
 from inspections, including GIS databases and shapefiles
 g. Upload final report and supporting documents to Clarity®. Clarity is RJN’s digital
 platform that unites powerful data analytics, smart AI automation, and GIS data
 management tools to deliver a single resource for monitoring and assessing
 system conditions and performance.

D. Contingency

This represents an allowance for unexpected issues that may arise during the course of the
work and would necessitate appreciable additional effort. RJN would promptly notify the City
if any such issues arise, and their related cost impact. Contingency funds could be used for
subsequent AVA inspection of portions of Segment 2 should additional inspection data become
necessary.

In the Water Line Condition Assessment Planning & Prep Report, $44,000.00 was allocated
for soil condition testing. However, as work on the report advanced it was determined that,
all things considered, soil condition testing would not yet be a cost-effective expenditure, and
RJN recommended that it not be performed as part of the Report. Thus, those related funds
have not been, and will not be, spent as part of the Report contract.
E. Items Requested from the City

1. Updated GIS geodatabases and/or shape files for the water distribution system.
2. Facilitating coordination with Beaver Water District.
3. Access to pipeline for inspection. Assistance locating and operating (i.e. opening and
 closing valves) facilities as required.
4. Excavation of pipes at Pipers launch and retrieval stations, sufficient for valved taps as
 described below. Related trench safety, backfill, compaction, and site restoration.
5. One valved pipeline tap at Pipers launch station and another one at retrieval station.
 Based on recent conversations with INGU, it is anticipated that a tap as large as 6” may
 be needed at the launch location (within BWD site) and a tap as large as 8” may be
 needed at the retrieval location (near Joyce Blvd. valve vault). Both locations are
 unpaved. These taps will need to be made at the 12 o’clock position on the pipe, a gate
 valve (full tap size) will need to be installed at the tapping flange, and a riser assembly
 projecting above the ground surface must be installed. (RJN will furnish and install the
 additional equipment needed for Pipers insertion and retrieval, as discussed above.)
6. Operation of valves as necessary for isolating the pipeline and launching the Pipers
 multi-sensor.
7. Assistance with traffic control in high traffic areas, as necessary.
8. Hydro-excavating (“potholing”) as necessary such that AVA equipment can access the
 pipe sufficiently. It is anticipated that a total of 22 potholes will be necessary (5 for
 Pipeline Segment 7, 7 for #8,10 for #9A, and 0 for #12). Further description, including
 cost projections, is provided in the Waterline Condition Assessment Planning & Prep
 Report.
F. Map of All Involved Pipeline Sections
G. Maps of Each Pipeline Section
 EXHIBIT B– PROPOSED SCHEDULE

RJN is prepared to start work immediately upon an Agreement.

 Task Timeline


 Pipeline Section 2


 Field Reconnaissance Visit To be completed within one month of NTP.

 To be completed within two months of a successful
 Internal Inspections
 Field Reconnaissance Visit.

 To be completed within three months of successful
 Technical Memorandum
 Internal Inspection.

 Pipeline Section 7, 8, 9A, 12


 Site Investigation and Planning To be completed in early 2026

 To be completed within two months of site
 AVA Inspections investigations, weather permitting (anticipated for
 Feb & March 2026)

 To be completed within two months of successful
 Preliminary Analysis Results
 inspections.

 To be completed within two months of completion of
 Draft Report
 analysis.
 EXHIBIT C – COMPENSATION SCHEDULE

 Pricing Terms for Invoicing: Lump Sum

 Original Contract Value: $267,380.00

 Amendment Value: $890,113

 Not-to-Exceed Total Project Cost: $1,157,493

 This project will be invoiced on a lump sum, percent complete basis based on the Cost Schedule
 on the next page.

Task Unit Price Units Fee

Project Management $56,790

Pipeline Section 2

Preparatory Work, Data Review, and Planning $25,940

Field Reconnaissance Visits and Equipment Preparation $40,110

Internal Inspections $51,010

Data Evaluation and Technical Memorandum $30,450

Subtotal $147,499

Pipeline Section 7, 8, 9A, 12

Site Investigation and Planning Lump Sum $71,530

AVA Inspection $9/ft 45,417 ft $408,753

Analysis and Reporting Lump Sum $129,530

Subtotal $609,813

Total $814,113

Deletion of “Soil Corrosivity Testing (as needed)” -$44,000

Contingency $120,000

TOTAL NET AMENDMENT PRICE: $890,113
Proposal Option

This Proposal can be amended to include additional work upon joint approval by the City and
RJN.
 AMENDMENT NO. 12
 TO
 AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES
 BETWEEN CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS AND
 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING OPERATIONS, INCORPORATED
 FOR
 WOOLSEY WET PRAIRIE ECOLOGICAL MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT
 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 12 to the Agreement For Professional Environmental Consulting
Services, dated May 8, 2014 (the “Agreement”), by and between CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS (CITY) and ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING OPERATIONS, INC. (ECO)
for environmental consulting services in connection with monitoring and ecological adaptive
management of CITY’s wetland mitigation site known as Woolsey Wet Prairie (SITE) is made
and entered into for purposes of continuity of SITE wetland habitat status in order to maintain
surplus wetland credits generated at SITE and due to Corps of Engineers (Corps) regulatory
requirements to manage and maintain wetland compensatory mitigation in perpetuity to assure
SITE continues to meet ecological performance standards.

WHEREAS, this AMENDMENT NO. 12 is a renewal of the May 8, 2014, Agreement that
included a provision for automatic renewal of ECO’s annual Scope of Services beyond 2014 for
additional 1-year terms upon mutual agreement by both CITY and ECO. Unless specifically
stated, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Neither this Amendment nor the Agreement may be modified except in writing signed by an
authorized representative of the CITY and ECO.

NOW THEREFORE, the CITY and ECO agree to amend the Agreement for ECO’s Scope of
Services as follows:

1. Part A - Project Administration & Management

 a) General administration and project management activities;

 b) Perform project initiation activities;

 c) Provide environmental regulatory and technical information to CITY;

 d) Meet with CITY, and/or CITY Contractors for information exchange, goal and timeline
 setting, reviewing management strategies, and action items;

 e) Perform internal project control including budgeting, scheduling, and quality control;

 f) Part A applies to January through December 2026. Renewal of ECO's annual Scope of
 Services will be reviewed by the City Council and amended upon approval for renewal of
 Part A services beyond 2026.




092925 - ECO WWP Amendment No. 12 1
2. Part B - Annual Ecological Restoration Monitoring

 a) Conduct qualitative monitoring activities throughout the growing season to maintain
 cumulative plant species lists, evaluations of seasonal hydrology and associated plant
 communities, and identification of stands of non-native / invasive plant species to be
 controlled;

 b) Observe and document total plant species richness for the mitigation SITE in historical
 comprehensive plant species lists;

 c) Record locations of concentrated stands of non-native and native invasive plant species and
 locations of rare Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission (ANHC) tracking plant species on
 wetland cell maps;

 d) Develop 2026 Woolsey Wet Prairie Adaptive Management Strategy & Monitoring Report
 No. 20 that is consistent with historical monitoring and management activities at Site in a
 format to be used for SITE adaptive management purposes;

 e) Part B applies to January through December 2026. Renewal of ECO's annual Scope of
 Services will be reviewed by the City Council and amended upon approval for renewal of
 Part B services beyond 2026.

3. Part C - Annual Adaptive Management Strategy

 a) Continued development and implementation of annual strategy for specific controls of
 invasive species via selection, coordination, and scheduling of time sensitive hydrology
 controls, herbicide applications, mowing, prescribed burning, and hand pulling;

 b) Make SITE visits throughout the growing season to make observations of hydrology,
 vegetation, and effectiveness of invasive vegetation control;

 c) Oversee selection, scheduling, and coordination of SITE adaptive management activities
 and provide guidance pertaining to SITE Deed-Restrictive Covenant restrictions to CITY
 and CITY’s Contractors associated with management of SITE;

 d) Provide restoration ecology advisory technical guidance to CITY and CITY’s Contractors
 associated with management of SITE for the purpose of implementation of adaptive
 management activities that are compliant with SITE permanent protection measures and
 restrictions specified in the CITY’s Corps Section 404 Permit;

 e) Document and maintain records of adaptive management activities implemented and the
 date of use;

 f) Make adjustments, as necessary, to timing and type of vegetation management to be
 implemented including, but not restricted to, hydrology management, mowing, herbicide
 applications, prescribed burning, and hand pulling of invasive plant species;



092925 - ECO WWP Amendment No. 12 2
 g) Utilize wetland cell aerial photographs showing locations of concentrated stands of
 invasive and non-native plant species and locations of rare ANHC tracking plant species in
 order to target and prioritize areas for specific management activities;

 h) Develop herbicide application specifications that include specific types of herbicides to
 apply to specific invasive plant species by CITY contractors;

 i) Schedule and select type of herbicide, adjuvant, and application rate to be used for specific
 target non-native and invasive plant species at specific locations and document herbicide
 effectiveness;

 j) Coordinate, schedule, and observe areas where herbicide applications have been made to
 evaluate effectiveness for controlling invasive species by CITY contractors;

 k) Develop burn specifications that clearly identify prescribed Burn Contractor
 responsibilities as a part of CITY’s informal bid process that identify: SITE preparation,
 notifications, and Burn Contractor responsibilities;

 l) Coordinate, schedule, and observe prescribed burn to evaluate Burn Contractor’s
 conformance with state laws, notifications, and specifications;

 m) Part C applies to January through December 2026. Renewal of ECO's annual Scope of
 Services will be reviewed by the City Council and amended upon approval for renewal of
 Part C services beyond 2026.

4. Part D - Update Credit Tracking Ledger for Surplus Wetland Credits

 a) SITE has generated surplus of wetland credits above those required by CITY’s Corps
 Section 404 permit for wetland compensatory mitigation. CITY has received Corps
 approval to use wetland credits to mitigate for wetland impacts caused by the CITY’s
 infrastructure improvement projects within Illinois River watershed HUC 11110103.

 b) At the time of development of this amendment under the 2025 Scope of Services, CITY
 has not utilized any surplus wetland credits for City infrastructure improvement projects
 requiring wetland compensatory mitigation.

 c) It is unknown at the current time, whether Part D services will be necessary for January
 through December 2026 and will be a function of whether or not surplus credit
 transactions occur. Should 2026 wetland credit transactions occur, ECO shall update
 wetland credit ledger accordingly for submittal to Corps at the end of 2026.

 5) Part D applies to January through December 2026. Renewal of ECO’s annual Scope of
 Services will be reviewed by the City Council and amended upon approval for renewal of
 Part D services beyond 2026.




092925 - ECO WWP Amendment No. 12 3
5. Part E – Academic Research Project Review and Guidance

 a) During 2017, there was an increased interest in the SITE for academic research projects
 from various departments of the University of Arkansas ranging from herpetology to soil
 microbiology. While research projects at the site are exciting and encouraged, the need
 exists for guidance and oversight to ensure that all parties involved are made aware of the
 various requirements of the CITY’s Corps Section 404 permit and Deed Restricted
 Covenant for the SITE. Failure to manage research project activities at the SITE has the
 potential to result in the CITY not being in compliance with the terms and conditions of
 the CITY’s Corps Section 404 permit and the Deed Restricted Covenant for the SITE.

 b) ECO, Inc. has developed a research request form and academic research guidance
 document intended for use by proposed research projects that will provide project-
 specific relative information to ECO, Inc., CITY’s Contractors, and the CITY for review
 and approval, while also educating the applicant about the SITE Corps Section 404
 permit requirements. ECO, Inc. will review academic research project proposals and
 provide project-specific guidance to parties conducting research at SITE.

 c) Part E applies to January through December 2026. Renewal of ECO's annual Scope of
 Services will be reviewed by the City Council and amended upon approval for renewal of
 Part E services beyond 2026.

6. Compensation

For the amended Scope of Services described herein, CITY agrees to pay ECO the sum specified
below on Cost Detail Table. The total payment shall be a lump sum “not to exceed” amount of
SIXTY-THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED U.S. DOLLARS ($63,500.00).




092925 - ECO WWP Amendment No. 12 4
 Amendment No. 12 – 2026 Cost Detail

 Amended ECO Scope of Services Fee Estimate
Part A - 2025 Project Administration & Management $4,000
Part B - 2025 Annual Ecological Restoration Monitoring $25,000
Part C - 2025 Annual Adaptive Management Strategy $32,000
Part D - 2025 Update Surplus Wetland Credit Tracking Ledger $0
Part E - 2025 Academic Research Project Guidance $2,500

 Total $63,500


 The CITY and ECO intending to be legally bound, indicate their approval of this
 AMENDMENT NO. 12 by their signatures below:


 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
 OPERATIONS, INC.


 By: By:
 Seth Pickens, President Molly Rawn, Mayor

 Date: September 29, 2025 Date:


 ATTEST:
 By:
 Kara Paxton, City Clerk/Treasurer

 Date:




 092925 - ECO WWP Amendment No. 12 5
 ENVICON-06 JERILEONARD
 DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 5/12/2025
  THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
  CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
  BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
  REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
  IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
  If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on
  this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
 CONTACT
PRODUCER NAME:
NFP Property & Casualty Services, Inc. PHONE FAX
 (A/C, No, Ext): (501) 778-9162 (A/C, No): (501) 778-0533
P.O. Box 49 E-MAIL
Benton, AR 72018 ADDRESS:
 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

 INSURER A : West American Insurance Company 44393
INSURED INSURER B : Ohio Casualty Insurance Company 24074
 Environmental Consulting Operations, Inc. INSURER C : Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company 10172
 17724 Interstate 30
 Suite 5A INSURER D :
 Benton, AR 72019 INSURER E :
 INSURER F :

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
  THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
  INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
  CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
  EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP
 LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS
 A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
 2,000,000
 DAMAGE TO RENTED
 CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR BZW(24) 57 08 55 94 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $

 MED EXP (Any one person) $
 15,000
 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
 2,000,000
 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $
 4,000,000
 POLICY PRO-
 JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
 4,000,000
 OTHER: $
 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
 (Ea accident) $
 2,000,000
 ANY AUTO BZW(24) 57 08 55 94 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
 OWNED SCHEDULED
 AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
 PROPERTY DAMAGE
 X HIRED
 AUTOS ONLY X NON-OWNED
 AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $

 $
 B X UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $
 1,000,000
 EXCESS LIAB CLAIMS-MADE USO(24) 57 08 55 94 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 AGGREGATE $
 DED X RETENTION $ 10,000 $
 1,000,000
 A WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH-
 AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY STATUTE ER
 Y/N XWW(24) 57 08 55 94 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 1,000,000
 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $
 OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? N/A
 (Mandatory in NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
 1,000,000
 If yes, describe under 1,000,000
 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $
 C E&O/Professional Lia 16KDGHH3903 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 Per Claim 2,000,000
 C E&O/Professional Lia 16KDGHH3903 5/10/2025 5/10/2026 Aggregate 2,000,000


DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)




CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION

 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
 THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
 City of Fayetteville ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
 113 W. Mountain Street
 Fayetteville, AR 72701
 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE




ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD