கேள்வி: வறுமையில் வாழும் மக்கள் தொகை வீதத்தின் அடிப்படையில் நாடுகளின் பட்டியல் என்பது என்ன?
பதில்: படிமம்:Percentage population under povertty line.png இது ஒரு வறுமையில் வாழும் மக்கள் தொகை வீதத்தின் அடிப்படையில் நாடுகளின் பட்டியல் ஆகும்.
கேள்வி: வறுமையில் வாழும் மக்கள் தொகை வீதத்தின் அடிப்படையில் நாடுகளின் பட்டியல் - நாடுகள் குறித்து விரிவாக சொல்லுங்கள்.
பதில்: {| style="font-size:95%;" |- valign="top" | style="text-align:center;"| 1.25 இற்கு கீழ் வாழும் மக்கள் தொகை, நாளுக்கு 2 டொலர் (கொள்வனவு ஆற்றல் சமநிலை), 4 டொலர் (%) | width=10 | | style="text-align:center;"| தேசிய வறுமைக் கோடு கீழ் வாழும் மக்கள் தொகை (%) |- valign="top" | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;text-align: right" |- ! நாடு ! ! ! ஆண்டு ! http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/region/LAC | Retrieved May 12, 2015World DataBank Poverty and Inequality Database |http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableselection/selectvariables.aspx?source=Poverty-and-Inequality-Database | http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx , Poverty headcount ratio at $4 a day (PPP) (% of population) |Retrieved May 12, 2015 ! ஆண்டு |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.5 || 3.00 || 2012 || 31.5 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 6.79 || 23.61 || 1995 || 63 || 1995 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.4 || 67.4 || 2009 || 90.6 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.4 || 2.9 || 2011 || 11.6urban only || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.28 || 12.43 || 2008 || 65.1 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || || 19.8 || 2015 |- |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 29 || 76.54 || 2012 || 95.7||2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.10 || 0.19 || 2008 || .3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 12.21 || 22.00 || 1999 || 52.9 || 1999 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 51.6 || 74.3 || 2012 || 92.5 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.4 || 15.2 || 2012 || 52.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.0 || 12.7 || 2012 || 29.3 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.04 || 0.19 || 2007 || 1.7 || 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 13.4 || 27.8 || 2009 || 55 || 09 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.1 || 2.3 || 2012 || 20.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.9 || 3.9 || 2011 || 11.3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 44.60 || 72.56 || 2009 || 93.5 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 81.32 || 93.45 || 2006 || 98.8 || 2006 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 22.75 || 53.27 || 2008|| 85.7 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 9.56 || 30.36 || 2007 || 84.1 || 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 21.02 || 40.85 || 2002|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 62.83 || 80.09 || 2008 || 94.2 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 61.94 || 83.28 || 2003|| 88.2 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.8 || 1.9 || 2011|| 9.9 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 6.3 || 18.6 || 2011|| 49.1 ||2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 5.6 || 12.0 || 2012|| 32.9 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.11 || 64.98 || 2004|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.72 || 46.15 || 2006 || 98.9 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 32.8 || 57.3 || 2011|| 87.6 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.4 || 3.1 || 2012|| 12.2 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.75 || 46.34 || 2008|| 87.2 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.06 || 0.09 || 2008|| .3 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.00 || 0.00 || 2009|| .3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 18.84 || 41.20 || 2002|| 78.9 || 2002 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.24 || 8.8 || 2012|| 33.3 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 37.44 || 72.82 || 2007|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 4.0 || 8.4 || 2012|| 27.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.69 || 15.43 || 2008|| 71.6 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.5 || 8.8 || 2012|| 34.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.46 || 0.9 || 2009 || 3.3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 36.8 || 72.2 || 2011 || 95.4 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 5.88 || 22.90 || 2009 || 61.8 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 4.84 || 19.59 || 2005 || 56.6 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 48.4 || 55.93 || 2010 || 83.6 || 2003 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 15.27 || 32.21 || 2008 ||67.9 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 28.59 || 51.84 || 2006 || 84.1 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 13.53 || 26.33 || 2006 ||62.4|| 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 40.9 || 72.7 || 2012 || 95.1 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 48.90 || 77.96 || 2002 || 95.8 || 2002 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.70 || 18.02 || 1998 || 45.5 ||1998 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 61.71 || 77.51 || 2001 || 90.7 || 2002 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 16.5 || 29.2 || 2011 || 56.4 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.07 || 0.18 || 2002 || 2.5 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 14.7 ||59.2 || 2011 http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2014/05/05-data-extreme-poverty-chandy-kharas|| 91.2 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 18.06 || 43.3 || 2010 || 80.5 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.45 || 8.03 || 2005 || 36.7 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 3.9 || 21.2 || 2012 || 71.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.21 || 5.44 || 2004 || 29.6 || 2004 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.12 || 1.59 || 2010 || 26.5 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.11 || 1.12 || 2009 || 17.5 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.37 || 67.21 || 2005 || 90 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 6.23 || 21.69 || 2009 || 67 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 33.88 || 62.00 || 2012 || 91.4 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.14 || 0.37 || 2008 || 7.3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.41 || 62.25 || 2003 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 83.76 || 94.88 || 2007 || 99|| 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.16 || 0.44 || 2008 || 4.7 ||2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.00 || 5.91 || 2009 || 24.8 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 81.29 || 92.62 || 2010 || 99|| 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 73.86 || 90.45 || 2004 || 97.2 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.00 || 2.27 || 2009 || 17.9|| 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 50.43 || 78.66 || 2010|| 96.4|| 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.43 || 47.69 || 2008 || 83.2 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.00 || 4.1 || 2012 || 21.3 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 31.15 || 44.69 || 2000 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.2 || 2.8 || 2011 || 29|| 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.2 || 0.70 || 2011 || 8.9 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.52 || 14.03 || 2007 || 52.9 || 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 59.58 || 81.77 || 2008 || 96.1|| 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.5 || 43.20 || 2010|| 68.8 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.7 || 56.0 || 2010|| 90.1 ||2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.5 || 20.8 || 2009|| 52.2 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.62 || 75.23 || 2008|| 96 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 62.0 || 82.2 || 2010|| 95.7 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 22.7 || 50.7 || 2011|| 91.1 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 4.0 || 8.9 || 2012|| 20.9 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 35.79 || 57.38 || 1996|| 83 || 1996 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 3.0 || 7.7 || 2012||23.8 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.9 || 8.0 || 2012|| 23.3 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 10.42 || 21.53 || 2009|| 75.2 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.05 || 0.20 || 2009||4.3 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.41 || 1.67 || 2009|| 18.3 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || || 5.3 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 63.17 || 82.37 || 2011|| 95.5 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 20.93 || 40.58 || 1995|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 28.18 || 54.20 || 2001|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 33.50 || 60.36 || 2005|| 88.8 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.25 || 1.14 || 2004|| 7.6 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.25 || 1.84 || 2007|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 53.37 || 76.08 || 2003||96.5||2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.3 || 0.5 || 2011||1.2 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.00 || 0.00 || 2008|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 9.40 || 26.2 || 2011||50.3||2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 4.1 || 23.9 || 2010||69.9||2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 19.80 || 44.14 || 2009|| 83.5 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 15.54 || 27.20 || 1999||52.9 || 1999 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 39.3 || 60.40 || 2010|| 82.8 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 1.71 || 16.85 || 2004|| 60 ||2004 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 6.56 || 27.69 || 2009|| 74.9 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.50 || 73.0 || 2012|| 94 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.37 || 3.5 || 2010|| 31 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 38.68 || 69.31 || 2006|| 91.4 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 4.16 || 13.53 || 1992|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.7 || 4.5 || 2010|| 26.3 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.1 || 2.6 || 2011|| 13.9 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 24.82 || 49.65 || 1998|| 83 || 1998 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 37.8 || 62.9 || 2013|| 88.2 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.06 || 0.17 || 2009|| 1.8 || 2010 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 0.30 || 1.3 || 2012|| 8.2 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 6.63 || 12.91 || 2006|| 36.7 ||2006 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 2.4 || 12.50 || 2012|| 48.5 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || 0.04 || 0.34 || 2009|| || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 17.53 || 46.60 || 2005|| 82|| 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 68.51 || 82.55 || 2006|| 95.7 || 2010 |} | | {| class="wikitable sortable" style="margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;text-align: right" |- ! நாடு ! data-sort-type="number" | உலக வங்கி ! ஆண்டு ! data-sort-type="number" | நடுவண் ஒற்று முகமை[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2046.html Population below poverty line] , த வேர்ல்டு ஃபக்ட்புக், நடுவண் ஒற்று முகமை, accessed on July 25, 2012. ! ஆண்டு ! பிற ! ஆண்டு |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 15.8 || 2011 || 16 || FY08/09 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 14.3 || 2012 || 12.5 || 2008&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 22.6 || 1995 || 23 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 36.6 || 2008 || 40.5 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || || || 23 || 2002 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 30|| 2013 || 5.4 || 2013http://www.cadena3.com/contenido/2013/04/24/112569.asp?titulo=El-Indec-informo-que-la-pobreza-bajo-al-54%-a-fines-de-2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.6 || 2008 || 34.1 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 6 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 7.6 || 2011 || 6 || 2012&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 9.3 || 2004 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 31.5 || 2010 || 26 || 2012&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 7.3 || 2011 || 27.1 || 2003&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 15.2 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 33.5 || 2002 || 43 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 36.2 || 2011 || 37.4 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || || || 19 || 2000 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23.2 || 2007 || 23.2 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 45.0 || 2011 || 51.3 || 2009&nbsp;est.Based on percent of population living on less than the international standard of $2/day (2009 est.). || 54.0 || 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 17.9 || 2011 || 18.6 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 19.3 || 2009 || 30.3 || 2003 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 10.0 || 2013 || 21.4 || 2013 || 12.1 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 20.7 || 2009 || 21.8 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.7 || 2009 || 46.4 || 2004 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 32.7 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 66.9 || 2006 || 68 || 2002&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 30.1 || 2007 || 31 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 39.9 || 2007 || 48 || 2000&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 9.4 || 2008This figure is the Low Income Cut-Off (LICO), a calculation that results in higher figures than found in many comparable economies; Canada does not have an official poverty line (2008). || 4.9 || 2004[http://www.fraserinstitute.org/COMMERCE.WEB/product_files/PovertyinCanada2006.pdf Basic Needs Poverty Measure] , an absolute poverty measure calculated by the ஃபிரேசர் நிறுவனம். (See related article, Poverty in Canada.) |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 26.6 || 30 || || 2007/2000 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 62 || 2008 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.7 || 2011 || 80 || 2001&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 14.4 || 2011 || 11.5 || 2012 || 10.4 || 2011 Note: The figure is on page 5 of the report. |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 13.4 || 2011In 2011, China set a new poverty line at RMB 2300 (approximately US $363; this new standard is significantly higher than the line set in 2009, and as a result, 128 million Chinese are now considered below the poverty line (2011). || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 32.7 || 2012 || 32.7 || 2012&nbsp;est. || 45.5 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 44.8 || 2004 || 60 || 2002&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 71.3 || 2006 || 71 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.5 || 2011 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 20.6 || 2012 || 24.8 || 2011&nbsp;est. || 18.9 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 42.7 || 2008 || 42 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 11.1 || 2004 || 18 || 2009 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.6 || 2012 || 9 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 13.4 || 2011 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 42 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 29 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 34.4 || 2010 || 34.4 || 2010&nbsp;est. || 41.1 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 49.9 || 2007 || 41 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.3 || 2012 || 28.6 || December&nbsp;2011 || 40.2 || 2009Urban areas. |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 25.2 || 2011 || 20 || 2005&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 34.5 || 2012 || 36.5 || 2010&nbsp;est. || 47.9 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 76.8 || 2006 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 69 || 1993 || 50 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 17.5 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 38.9 || 2005 || 29.2 || FY09/10&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 31 || 2009 || 25.5 || FY90/91 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 6.2 || 2004 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 32.7 || 2005 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 48.4 || 2010 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || || || 38 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 17.7 || 2011 || 9.7 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 15.5 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 24.2 || 2012 || 28.5 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 20 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 9.2 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 38 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 23 || 2001&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 53.7 || 2011 || 54 || 2011&nbsp;est. || 54.8 || 2006 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 69.3 || 2010 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 55.2 || 2012 || 47 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 35 || 2006 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 58.5 || 2012 || 80 || 2003&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 60 || 2010 || 65 || 2010 || 68.9 || 2007 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 12.2 || 2009 || 13.9 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 21.9http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx?isshared=true || 2012 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 12.5 || 2011 || 13.33 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 18.7 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 22.9 || 2007 || 25 || 2008&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 29.9 || 2012 || 10.3 || 2014http://www.istat.it/en/archive/164876 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 5.5 || 2009 || 6.8 || 2004 est. |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 23.6 || 2007Israel's poverty line is $7.30 per person per day (2007). || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 17.6 || 2010 || 16.5 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 16 || 2007Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) press release, 20 October 2009 (2010). || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 14.4 || 2010 || 14.2 || 2002 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.2 || 2009 || 8.2 || 2009 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 45.9 || 2005 || 50 || 2000&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 15 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 29.2 || 2010 || 30 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 33.7 || 2010 || 33.7 || 2011&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.6 || 2008 || 26 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 5.9 || 2004 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 28 || 1999&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 56.6 || 2003 || 49 || 1999 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 63.8 || 2007 || 80 || 2000&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || See note. || About one-third of Libyans live at or below the national poverty line. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 4 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.1 || 2010 || 30.9 || 2010 || 30.4 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 75.3 || 2010 || 50 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 50.7 || 2010 || 53 || 2004 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 3.8 || 2009 || 3.8 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 16 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 43.6 || 2010 || 36.1 || 2005&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 42 || 2008 || 40 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 8 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 51.3 || 2010 || 48.0 || 2013|| 48.0 || 2013 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 26.7 || 2000 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 16.6 || 2012 || 26.3 || 2009 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.4 || 2012 || 39.2 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 11.3 || 2012 || 6.6 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 9 || 2007 || 15 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 54.7 || 2009 || 54 || 2008&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 28.7 || 2009 || 55.8 || 2005&nbsp;est.The UNDP's 2005 Human Development Report indicated that 34.9% of the population live on $1 per day and 55.8% live on $2 per day (2005 est.). || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 25.2 || 2011 || 25.2 || 2011 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 10.5 || 2005 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 42.5 || 2009 || 46.2 || 2005 || 61.9 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 59.5 || 2007 || 63 || 1993&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.0 || 2010 || 70 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || || || 4.3 || 2007Poverty data: http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100577.htm Norway. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – 2007], US Department of State; Population: [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/no.html Norway – CIA The World Factbook] . |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 22.3 || 2006 || 22.3 || FY05/06&nbsp;est. || 2013 || 21% |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 27.6 || 2011 || 26 || 2012&nbsp;est. || 26.4 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 39.9 || 2009 || 37 || 2002&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 26.9 || 2012 || 34.7 || 2010&nbsp;est. || 56.0 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 25.8 || 2012 || 31.3 || 2010 || 34.8 || 2009 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 25.2 || 2012 || 26.5 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 7.6 || 2008 || 10.2 || 2003&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 18 || 2006 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 13.8 || 2006 || 22.2 || 2011&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 12.7 || 2011 || 13.1 || 2010 || 13.1 || Dec. 2008[http://www.gks.ru/bgd/free/B04_03/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d03/235.htm Structure of money incomes and share of expenditures in money incomes of population ] . |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 44.9 || 2011 || 60 || 2001&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 61.7 || 2009 || 54 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.7 || 2011 || 54 || 2001&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 24.6 || 2011 || 9.1 || 2013&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 52.9 || 2011 || 70.2 || 2004 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 13.2 || 2011 || 21 || 2002 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 12.3 || 2008 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 23 || 2006 || 31.3 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 50.6 || 2009 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 19.8 || 2005 || 21.1 || 2012 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 8.9 || 2010 || 8.9 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.5 || 2009 || 40 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 70 || 2002&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 63.0 || 2009 || 69 || 2006 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 6.9 || 2010 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 11.9 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 1.16 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 46.7 || 2009 || 53 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 28.2 || 2012 || 36 || 2002&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 13.2 || 2011 || 8.1 || 2009&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 58.7 || 2011 || 32 || 1989&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 24 || FY03/04 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 17 || 2007&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 15.5 || 2010 || 3.8 || 2005&nbsp;est. || 3.8 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 18.1 || 2009 || 16.9 || 2010 || 20.5 || 2005 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 30 || 2004&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 24.5 || 2009 || 35 || 2001&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 7.8 || 2011 || 24.1 || 2010 || 24.3 || 2013 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 19.5 || 2003 || 0.0 || 2011 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 14 || 2006&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || || || 15.1 || 2010&nbsp;est. || 14.5 || 2013 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 12.4 || 2012 || 18.6|| 2010&nbsp;est. || 6.7 || 2012http://www.diariotextual.com/economia/item/1764-cepal-argentina-es-el-pa%C3%ADs-con-menos-pobreza-de-am%C3%A9rica-latina.html . |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 16.0 || 2011 || 26 || 2008&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 25.4 || 2012 || 31.6 || 2011&nbsp;est. || 27.6 || 2008 |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 17.2 || 2012 || 14.5 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || || || 28.9 || 2002 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || || || 18.3 || 2010&nbsp;est. || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| ' || 25.8 || 2011 || || || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 34.8 || 2005 || 45.2 || 2003 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 59.3 || 2006 || 64 || 2006 || || |- | style="text-align:left;"| || 72.3 || 2011 || 68 || 2004 || || |} |}