Learning to Control an Unstable System with Forward Modeling
Authors: Michael I. Jordan, Robert A. Jacobs
Published in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2  (NIPS 1989) (Main Conference Track), 1989

Abstract: The forward modeling approach is a  methodology for  learning con(cid:173) trol when data is  available in distal coordinate systems.  We extend  previous work by considering how this methodology can be applied  to  the optimization of quantities that  are  distal not only in space  but also in time. 
In  many  learning control  problems,  the  output  variables  of the  controller  are  not  the natural coordinates in  which to specify tasks and evaluate performance.  Tasks  are generally more naturally specified in  "distal"  coordinate systems (e.g., endpoint  coordinates for  manipulator  motion)  than in  the  "proximal"  coordinate  system of  the controller (e.g., joint angles or torques).  Furthermore, the relationship between  proximal  coordinates  and  distal  coordinates  is  often  not  known  a  priori  and,  if  known, not easily inverted. 
The forward  modeling  approach is  a  methodology for  learning  control  when  train(cid:173) ing  data  is  available  in  distal  coordinate  systems.  A  forward  model is  a  network  that  learns  the  transformation  from  proximal  to  distal  coordinates  so  that  distal  specifications  can  be  used  in  training the  controller  (Jordan &  Rumelhart,  1990).  The forward  model  can  often  be learned  separately  from  the  controller  because  it  depends only on  the dynamics of the controlled system and not on  the closed-loop  dynamics. 
In previous work, we studied forward models of kinematic transformations (Jordan,  1988, 1990) and state transitions (Jordan & Rumelhart, 1990).  In the current paper, 
Learning to Control an Unstable System with Forward Modeling 
325 
we  go  beyond the spatial credit  assignment  problems  studied  in  those  papers  and  broaden  the  application  of forward  modeling  to  include  cases  of temporal  credit  assignment  (cf.  Barto,  Sutton,  &  Anderson,  1983;  Werbos,  1987).  As  discussed  below, the function  to be modeled in such  cases  depends on  a  time  integral of the  closed-loop  dynamics.  This  fact  has  two  important  implications.  First,  the  data  needed for learning the forward model can no longer be obtained solely by observing  the  instantaneous state or  output  of the  plant.  Second,  the  forward  model  is  no  longer independent of the controller:  If the parameters of the controller are changed  by  a  learning  algorithm,  then  the  closed-loop  dynamics  change  and  so  does  the  mapping from proximal to distal variables.  Thus the learning of the forward  model  and the learning of the  controller can no longer be separated into different  phases. 
1  FORWARD MODELING  In  this  section  we  briefly  summarize  our  previous  work  on  forward  modeling  (see  also Nguyen & Widrow,  1989 and Werbos,  1987). 
1.1  LEARNING A  FORWARD  MODEL 
Given a fixed  control law , the learning of a forward  model is  a  system identification  problem.  Let z  = g(s, u)  be  a  system to be  modeled,  where  z  is  the output or the  state-derivative, s  is  the state, and u  is  the control.  We  require the forward  model  to minimize  the cost functional 
Jm  = ~ J (z - z)T(z - z)dt.