New Approaches Towards Robust and Adaptive Speech Recognition
Authors: Samy Bengio, Katrin Weber Hervé Bourlard
Published in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13  (NIPS 2000) (Main Conference Track), 2000

Abstract: In this paper, we discuss some new research directions in automatic  speech recognition  (ASR),  and which  somewhat  deviate  from  the  usual approaches.  More  specifically,  we  will  motivate  and  briefly  describe  new  approaches  based  on  multi-stream  and  multi/band  ASR. These approaches extend the standard hidden Markov model  (HMM)  based approach by assuming that the different (frequency)  channels representing the speech signal are processed by different  (independent)  "experts", each expert focusing  on a  different  char(cid:173) acteristic of the signal, and that the different stream likelihoods (or  posteriors) are combined at some (temporal) stage to yield a global  recognition output.  As  a further  extension to multi-stream ASR,  we  will  finally  introduce  a  new  approach,  referred  to  as  HMM2,  where the HMM  emission probabilities are estimated via state spe(cid:173) cific feature based HMMs responsible for merging the stream infor(cid:173) mation and modeling their possible correlation. 
1  Multi-Channel Processing in ASR 
Current automatic speech recognition systems are based on (context-dependent or  context-independent)  phone  models  described  in  terms  of  a  sequence  of  hidden  Markov model  (HMM)  states, where each HMM  state is assumed to be character(cid:173) ized  by  a  stationary probability  density  function.  Furthermore, time  correlation,  and consequently  the  dynamic  of the  signal,  inside  each  HMM  state is  also  usu(cid:173) ally  disregarded  (although the use  of temporal  delta and  delta-delta features  can  capture some  of this  correlation).  Consequently,  only medium-term  dependencies  are captured via the topology of the HMM  model,  while  short-term and long-term  dependencies are usually very poorly modeled.  Ideally, we  want to design a partic(cid:173) ular HMM  able to accommodate multiple time-scale characteristics so that we  can  capture phonetic properties, as well as syllable structures and {long term) invariants  that are more robust to noise.  It is,  however,  clear that those  different  time-scale  features  will  also  exhibit  different  levels  of stationarity  and  will  require  different  HMM  topologies to capture their dynamics.  There are many potential advantages to such a multi-stream approach, including: 

The  definition of a  principled way to merge different  temporal knowledge  sources such as  acoustic and visual inputs, even if the temporal sequences  are  not  synchronous  and  do  not  have  the  same  data  rate  - see  [13]  for  further discussion about this. 
Possibility to incorporate multiple time resolutions  (as  part of a  structure 

with multiple unit lengths,  such as phon(l  and syllable). 

As  a  particular  case  of multi-stream  processing,  mufti-band  ASR  [2,  5],  involving the independent processing and combination of partial frequency  bands,  have many potential advantages briefly discussed below. 

In the following,  we  will not discuss the underlying algorithms  (more or less  "com(cid:173) plex"  variants of Viterbi decoding), nor detailed experimental results  (see,  e.g.,  [4]  for  recent results).  Instead, we  will mainly focus  on the combination strategy and  discuss different variants arounds the same formalism. 
2  Multiband-based  ASR 
2.1  General Formalism 
As  a  particular case  of the  multi-stream paradigm, we  have been investigating an  ASR approach based on independent processing and combination of frequency sub(cid:173) bands.  The general idea, as illustrated in Fig. 1, is to split the whole frequency band  (represented in terms of critical bands)  into a few  subbands on which different rec(cid:173) ognizers are independently applied.  The resulting probabilities are then combined  for  recognition later in the process at some segmental level.  Starting from  critical  bands, acoustic processing is now performed independently for each frequency band,  yielding K  input streams, each being associated with a particular frequency band.