Chapter 4. Packaging software In the following sections, learn the basics of the packaging process with the RPM package manager. 4.1. Setting up RPM packaging workspace To build RPM packages, you must first create a special workspace that consists of directories used for different packaging purposes. 4.1.1. Configuring RPM packaging workspace To configure the RPM packaging workspace, you can set up a directory layout by using the rpmdev-setuptree utility. Prerequisites You installed the rpmdevtools package, which provides utilities for packaging RPMs: Procedure Run the rpmdev-setuptree utility: Additional resources RPM packaging workspace directories 4.1.2. RPM packaging workspace directories The following are the RPM packaging workspace directories created by using the rpmdev-setuptree utility: Table 4.1. RPM packaging workspace directories Directory Purpose BUILD Contains build artifacts compiled from the source files from the SOURCES directory. RPMS Binary RPMs are created under the RPMS directory in subdirectories for different architectures. For example, in the x86_64 or noarch subdirectory. SOURCES Contains compressed source code archives and patches. The rpmbuild command then searches for these archives and patches in this directory. SPECS Contains spec files created by the packager. These files are then used for building packages. SRPMS When you use the rpmbuild command to build an SRPM instead of a binary RPM, the resulting SRPM is created under this directory. 4.2. About spec files A spec file is a file with instructions that the rpmbuild utility uses to build an RPM package. This file provides necessary information to the build system by defining instructions in a series of sections. These sections are defined in the Preamble and the Body part of the spec file: The Preamble section contains a series of metadata items that are used in the Body section. The Body section represents the main part of the instructions. 4.2.1. Preamble items The following are some of the directives that you can use in the Preamble section of the RPM spec file. Table 4.2. The Preamble section directives Directive Definition Name A base name of the package that must match the spec file name. Version An upstream version number of the software. Release The number of times the version of the package was released. Set the initial value to 1%{?dist} and increase it with each new release of the package. Reset to 1 when a new Version of the software is built. Summary A brief one-line summary of the package. License A license of the software being packaged. The exact format for how to label the License in your spec file varies depending on which RPM-based Linux distribution guidelines you are following, for example, GPLv3+ . URL A full URL for more information about the software, for example, an upstream project website for the software being packaged. Source A path or URL to the compressed archive of the unpatched upstream source code. This link must point to an accessible and reliable storage of the archive, for example, the upstream page, not the packager's local storage. You can apply the Source directive either with or without numbers at the end of the directive name. If there is no number given, the number is assigned to the entry internally. You can also give the numbers explicitly, for example, Source0 , Source1 , Source2 , Source3 , and so on. Patch A name of the first patch to apply to the source code, if necessary. You can apply the Patch directive either with or without numbers at the end of the directive name. If there is no number given, the number is assigned to the entry internally. You can also give the numbers explicitly, for example, Patch0 , Patch1 , Patch2 , Patch3 , and so on. You can apply the patches individually by using the %patch0 , %patch1 , %patch2 macro, and so on. Macros are applied within the %prep directive in the Body section of the RPM spec file. Alternatively, you can use the %autopatch macro that automatically applies all patches in the order they are given in the spec file. BuildArch An architecture that the software will be built for. If the software is not architecture-dependent, for example, if you wrote the software entirely in an interpreted programming language, set the value to BuildArch: noarch . If you do not set this value, the software automatically inherits the architecture of the machine on which it is built, for example, x86_64 . BuildRequires A comma- or whitespace-separated list of packages required to build the program written in a compiled language. There can be multiple entries of BuildRequires , each on its own line in the SPEC file. Requires A comma- or whitespace-separated list of packages required by the software to run once installed. There can be multiple entries of Requires , each on its own line in the spec file. ExcludeArch If a piece of software cannot operate on a specific processor architecture, you can exclude this architecture in the ExcludeArch directive. Conflicts A comma- or whitespace-separated list of packages that must not be installed on the system in order for your software to function properly when installed. There can be multiple entries of Conflicts , each on its own line in the spec file. Obsoletes The Obsoletes directive changes the way updates work depending on the following factors: If you use the rpm command directly on a command line, it removes all packages that match obsoletes of packages being installed, or the update is performed by an updates or dependency solver. If you use the updates or dependency resolver ( YUM ), packages containing matching Obsoletes: are added as updates and replace the matching packages. Provides If you add the Provides directive to the package, this package can be referred to by dependencies other than its name. The Name , Version , and Release ( NVR ) directives comprise the file name of the RPM package in the name-version-release format. You can display the NVR information for a specific package by querying RPM database by using the rpm command, for example: Here, bash is the package name, 4.4.19 is the version, and 7.el8 is the release. The x86_64 marker is the package architecture. Unlike NVR , the architecture marker is not under direct control of the RPM packager, but is defined by the rpmbuild build environment. The exception to this is the architecture-independent noarch package. 4.2.2. Body items The following are the items used in the Body section of the RPM spec file. Table 4.3. The Body section items Directive Definition %description A full description of the software packaged in the RPM. This description can span multiple lines and can be broken into paragraphs. %prep A command or series of commands to prepare the software for building, for example, for unpacking the archive in the Source directive. The %prep directive can contain a shell script. %build A command or series of commands for building the software into machine code (for compiled languages) or bytecode (for some interpreted languages). %install A command or series of commands that the rpmbuild utility will use to install the software into the BUILDROOT directory once the software has been built. These commands copy the desired build artifacts from the %_builddir directory, where the build happens, to the %buildroot directory that contains the directory structure with the files to be packaged. This includes copying files from ~/rpmbuild/BUILD to ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT and creating the necessary directories in ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT . The %install directory is an empty chroot base directory, which resembles the end user's root directory. Here you can create any directories that will contain the installed files. To create such directories, you can use RPM macros without having to hardcode the paths. Note that %install is only run when you create a package, not when you install it. For more information, see Working with spec files . %check A command or series of commands for testing the software, for example, unit tests. %files A list of files, provided by the RPM package, to be installed in the user's system and their full path location on the system. During the build, if there are files in the %buildroot directory that are not listed in %files , you will receive a warning about possible unpackaged files. Within the %files section, you can indicate the role of various files by using built-in macros. This is useful for querying the package file manifest metadata by using the rpm command. For example, to indicate that the LICENSE file is a software license file, use the %license macro. %changelog A record of changes that happened to the package between different Version or Release builds. These changes include a list of date-stamped entries for each Version-Release of the package. These entries log packaging changes, not software changes, for example, adding a patch or changing the build procedure in the %build section. 4.2.3. Advanced items A spec file can contain advanced items, such as Scriptlets or Triggers . Scriptlets and Triggers take effect at different points during the installation process on the end user's system, not the build process. 4.3. BuildRoots In the context of RPM packaging, buildroot is a chroot environment. The build artifacts are placed here by using the same file system hierarchy as the future hierarchy in the end user's system, with buildroot acting as the root directory. The placement of build artifacts must comply with the file system hierarchy standard of the end user's system. The files in buildroot are later put into a cpio archive, which becomes the main part of the RPM. When RPM is installed on the end user's system, these files are extracted in the root directory, preserving the correct hierarchy. Note The rpmbuild program has its own defaults. Overriding these defaults can cause certain issues. Therefore, avoid defining your own value of the buildroot macro. Use the default %{buildroot} macro instead. 4.4. RPM macros An rpm macro is a straight text substitution that can be conditionally assigned based on the optional evaluation of a statement when certain built-in functionality is used. Therefore, RPM can perform text substitutions for you. For example, you can define Version of the packaged software only once in the %{version} macro, and use this macro throughout the spec file. Every occurrence is automatically substituted by Version that you defined in the macro. Note If you see an unfamiliar macro, you can evaluate it with the following command: For example, to evaluate the %{_bindir} and %{_libexecdir} macros, enter: Additional resources More on macros 4.5. Working with spec files To package new software, you must create a spec file. You can create the spec file either of the following ways: Write the new spec file manually from scratch. Use the rpmdev-newspec utility. This utility creates an unpopulated spec file, where you fill the necessary directives and fields. Note Some programmer-focused text editors pre-populate a new spec file with their own spec template. The rpmdev-newspec utility provides an editor-agnostic method. 4.5.1. Creating a new spec file for sample Bash, Python, and C programs You can create a spec file for each of the three implementations of the Hello World! program by using the rpmdev-newspec utility. Prerequisites The following Hello World! program implementations were placed into the ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES directory: bello-0.1.tar.gz pello-0.1.2.tar.gz cello-1.0.tar.gz ( cello-output-first-patch.patch ) Procedure Navigate to the ~/rpmbuild/SPECS directory: Create a spec file for each of the three implementations of the Hello World! program: The ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ directory now contains three spec files named bello.spec , cello.spec , and pello.spec . Examine the created files. The directives in the files represent those described in About spec files . In the following sections, you will populate particular section in the output files of rpmdev-newspec . 4.5.2. Modifying an original spec file The original output spec file generated by the rpmdev-newspec utility represents a template that you must modify to provide necessary instructions for the rpmbuild utility. rpmbuild then uses these instructions to build an RPM package. Prerequisites The unpopulated ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/<name>.spec spec file was created by using the rpmdev-newspec utility. For more information, see Creating a new spec file for sample Bash, Python, and C programs . Procedure Open the ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/<name>.spec file provided by the rpmdev-newspec utility. Populate the following directives of the spec file Preamble section: Name Name was already specified as an argument to rpmdev-newspec . Version Set Version to match the upstream release version of the source code. Release Release is automatically set to 1%{?dist} , which is initially 1 . Summary Enter a one-line explanation of the package. License Enter the software license associated with the source code. URL Enter the URL to the upstream software website. For consistency, utilize the %{name} RPM macro variable and use the https://example.com/%{name} format. Source Enter the URL to the upstream software source code. Link directly to the software version being packaged. Note The example URLs in this documentation include hard-coded values that could possibly change in the future. Similarly, the release version can change as well. To simplify these potential future changes, use the %{name} and %{version} macros. By using these macros, you need to update only one field in the spec file. BuildRequires Specify build-time dependencies for the package. Requires Specify run-time dependencies for the package. BuildArch Specify the software architecture. Populate the following directives of the spec file Body section. You can think of these directives as section headings, because these directives can define multi-line, multi-instruction, or scripted tasks to occur. %description Enter the full description of the software. %prep Enter a command or series of commands to prepare software for building. %build Enter a command or series of commands for building software. %install Enter a command or series of commands that instruct the rpmbuild command on how to install the software into the BUILDROOT directory. %files Specify the list of files, provided by the RPM package, to be installed on your system. %changelog Enter the list of datestamped entries for each Version-Release of the package. Start the first line of the %changelog section with an asterisk ( * ) character followed by Day-of-Week Month Day Year Name Surname <email> - Version-Release . For the actual change entry, follow these rules: Each change entry can contain multiple items, one for each change. Each item starts on a new line. Each item begins with a hyphen ( - ) character. You have now written an entire spec file for the required program. Additional resources Preamble items Body items An example spec file for a sample Bash program An example spec file for a sample Python program An example spec file for a sample C program Building RPMs 4.5.3. An example spec file for a sample Bash program You can use the following example spec file for the bello program written in bash for your reference. An example spec file for the bello program written in bash The BuildRequires directive, which specifies build-time dependencies for the package, was deleted because there is no building step for bello . Bash is a raw interpreted programming language, and the files are just installed to their location on the system. The Requires directive, which specifies run-time dependencies for the package, includes only bash , because the bello script requires only the bash shell environment to execute. The %build section, which specifies how to build the software, is blank, because the bash script does not need to be built. Note To install bello , you must create the destination directory and install the executable bash script file there. Therefore, you can use the install command in the %install section. You can use RPM macros to do this without hardcoding paths. Additional resources What is source code 4.5.4. An example spec file for a sample Python program You can use the following example spec file for the pello program written in the Python programming language for your reference. An example spec file for the pello program written in Python The Requires directive, which specifies run-time dependencies for the package, includes two packages: The python package required to execute the byte-compiled code at runtime. The bash package required to execute the small entry-point script. The BuildRequires directive, which specifies build-time dependencies for the package, includes only the python package. The pello program requires python to perform the byte-compile build process. The %build section, which specifies how to build the software, creates a byte-compiled version of the script. Note that in real-world packaging, it is usually done automatically, depending on the distribution used. The %install section corresponds to the fact that you must install the byte-compiled file into a library directory on the system so that it can be accessed. This example of creating a wrapper script in-line in the spec file shows that the spec file itself is scriptable. This wrapper script executes the Python byte-compiled code by using the here document . Additional resources What is source code 4.5.5. An example spec file for a sample C program You can use the following example spec file for the cello program that was written in the C programming language for your reference. An example spec file for the cello program written in C The BuildRequires directive, which specifies build-time dependencies for the package, includes the following packages required to perform the compilation build process: gcc make The Requires directive, which specifies run-time dependencies for the package, is omitted in this example. All runtime requirements are handled by rpmbuild , and the cello program does not require anything outside of the core C standard libraries. The %build section reflects the fact that in this example the Makefile file for the cello program was written. Therefore, you can use the GNU make command. However, you must remove the call to %configure because you did not provide a configure script. You can install the cello program by using the %make_install macro. This is possible because the Makefile file for the cello program is available. Additional resources What is source code 4.6. Building RPMs You can build RPM packages by using the rpmbuild command. When using this command, a certain directory and file structure is expected, which is the same as the structure that was set up by the rpmdev-setuptree utility. Different use cases and desired outcomes require different combinations of arguments to the rpmbuild command. The following are the main use cases: Building source RPMs. Building binary RPMs: Rebuilding a binary RPM from a source RPM. Building a binary RPM from the spec file. 4.6.1. Building source RPMs Building a Source RPM (SRPM) has the following advantages: You can preserve the exact source of a certain Name-Version-Release of an RPM file that was deployed to an environment. This includes the exact spec file, the source code, and all relevant patches. This is useful for tracking and debugging purposes. You can build a binary RPM on a different hardware platform or architecture. Prerequisites You have installed the rpmbuild utility on your system: The following Hello World! implementations were placed into the ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/ directory: bello-0.1.tar.gz pello-0.1.2.tar.gz cello-1.0.tar.gz ( cello-output-first-patch.patch ) A spec file for the program that you want to package exists. Procedure Navigate to the ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ directive, which contains the created spec file: Build the source RPM by entering the rpmbuild command with the specified spec file: The -bs option stands for the build source . For example, to build source RPMs for the bello , pello , and cello programs, enter: Verification Verify that the rpmbuild/SRPMS directory includes the resulting source RPMs. The directory is a part of the structure expected by rpmbuild . Additional resources Working with spec files Creating a new spec file for sample Bash, C, and Python programs Modifying an original spec file 4.6.2. Rebuilding a binary RPM from a source RPM To rebuild a binary RPM from a source RPM (SRPM), use the rpmbuild command with the --rebuild option. The output generated when creating the binary RPM is verbose, which is helpful for debugging. The output varies for different examples and corresponds to their spec files. The resulting binary RPMs are located in the ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/YOURARCH directory, where YOURARCH is your architecture, or in the ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ directory, if the package is not architecture-specific. Prerequisites You have installed the rpmbuild utility on your system: Procedure Navigate to the ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ directive, which contains the source RPM: Rebuild the binary RPM from the source RPM: Replace srpm with the name of the source RPM file. For example, to rebuild bello , pello , and cello from their SRPMs, enter: Note Invoking rpmbuild --rebuild involves the following processes: Installing the contents of the SRPM (the spec file and the source code) into the ~/rpmbuild/ directory. Building an RPM by using the installed contents. Removing the spec file and the source code. You can retain the spec file and the source code after building either of the following ways: When building the RPM, use the rpmbuild command with the --recompile option instead of the --rebuild option. Install SRPMs for bello , pello , and cello : 4.6.3. Building a binary RPM from the spec file To build a binary RPM from its spec file, use the rpmbuild command with the -bb option. Prerequisites You have installed the rpmbuild utility on your system: Procedure Navigate to the ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ directive, which contains spec files: Build the binary RPM from its spec : For example, to build bello , pello , and cello binary RPMs from their spec files, enter: 4.7. Checking RPMs for common errors After creating a package, you might want to check the quality of the package. The main tool for checking package quality is rpmlint . With the rpmlint tool, you can perform the following actions: Improve RPM maintainability. Enable content validation by performing static analysis of the RPM. Enable error checking by performing static analysis of the RPM. You can use rpmlint to check binary RPMs, source RPMs (SRPMs), and spec files. Therefore, this tool is useful for all stages of packaging. Note that rpmlint has strict guidelines. Therefore, it is sometimes acceptable to skip some of its errors and warnings as shown in the following sections. Note In the examples described in the following sections, rpmlint is run without any options, which produces a non-verbose output. For detailed explanations of each error or warning, run rpmlint -i instead. 4.7.1. Checking a sample Bash program for common errors In the following sections, investigate possible warnings and errors that can occur when checking an RPM for common errors on the example of the bello spec file and bello binary RPM. 4.7.1.1. Checking the bello spec file for common errors Inspect the outputs of the following examples to learn how to check a bello spec file for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the bello spec file For bello.spec , there is only one invalid-url Source0 warning. This warning means that the URL listed in the Source0 directive is unreachable. This is expected, because the specified example.com URL does not exist. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. Output of running the rpmlint command on the bello SRPM For the bello SRPM, there is a new invalid-url URL warning that means that the URL specified in the URL directive is unreachable. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. 4.7.1.2. Checking the bello binary RPM for common errors When checking binary RPMs, the rpmlint command checks the following items: Documentation Manual pages Consistent use of the filesystem hierarchy standard Inspect the outputs of the following example to learn how to check a bello binary RPM for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the bello binary RPM The no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary warnings mean that the RPM has no documentation or manual pages, because you did not provide any. Apart from the output warnings, the RPM passed rpmlint checks. 4.7.2. Checking a sample Python program for common errors In the following sections, investigate possible warnings and errors that can occur when validating RPM content on the example of the pello spec file and pello binary RPM. 4.7.2.1. Checking the pello spec file for common errors Inspect the outputs of the following examples to learn how to check a pello spec file for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the pello spec file The invalid-url Source0 warning means that the URL listed in the Source0 directive is unreachable. This is expected, because the specified example.com URL does not exist. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. The hardcoded-library-path errors suggest using the %{_libdir} macro instead of hard-coding the library path. For the sake of this example, you can safely ignore these errors. However, for packages going into production, check all errors carefully. Output of running the rpmlint command on the SRPM for pello The invalid-url URL error means that the URL mentioned in the URL directive is unreachable. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. 4.7.2.2. Checking the pello binary RPM for common errors When checking binary RPMs, the rpmlint command checks the following items: Documentation Manual pages Consistent use of the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard Inspect the outputs of the following example to learn how to check a pello binary RPM for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the pello binary RPM The no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary warnings mean that the RPM has no documentation or manual pages because you did not provide any. The only-non-binary-in-usr-lib warning means that you provided only non-binary artifacts in the /usr/lib/ directory. This directory is typically used for shared object files, which are binary files. Therefore, rpmlint expects at least one or more files in /usr/lib/ to be binary. This is an example of an rpmlint check for compliance with Filesystem Hierarchy Standard. To ensure the correct placement of files, use RPM macros. For the sake of this example, you can safely ignore this warning. The non-executable-script error means that the /usr/lib/pello/pello.py file has no execute permissions. The rpmlint tool expects the file to be executable because the file contains the shebang ( #! ). For the purpose of this example, you can leave this file without execute permissions and ignore this error. Apart from the output warnings and errors, the RPM passed rpmlint checks. 4.7.3. Checking a sample C program for common errors In the following sections, investigate possible warnings and errors that can occur when validating RPM content on the example of the cello spec file and cello binary RPM. 4.7.3.1. Checking the cello spec file for common errors Inspect the outputs of the following examples to learn how to check a cello spec file for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the cello spec file For cello.spec , there is only one invalid-url Source0 warning. This warning means that the URL listed in the Source0 directive is unreachable. This is expected because the specified example.com URL does not exist. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. Output of running the rpmlint command on the cello SRPM For the cello SRPM, there is a new invalid-url URL warning. This warning means that the URL specified in the URL directive is unreachable. Assuming that this URL will be valid in the future, you can ignore this warning. 4.7.3.2. Checking the cello binary RPM for common errors When checking binary RPMs, the rpmlint command checks the following items: Documentation Manual pages Consistent use of the filesystem hierarchy standard Inspect the outputs of the following example to learn how to check a cello binary RPM for common errors. Output of running the rpmlint command on the cello binary RPM The no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary warnings mean that the RPM has no documentation or manual pages because you did not provide any. Apart from the output warnings, the RPM passed rpmlint checks. 4.8. Logging RPM activity to syslog You can log any RPM activity or transaction by using the System Logging protocol ( syslog ). Prerequisites The syslog plug-in is installed on the system: Note The default location for the syslog messages is the /var/log/messages file. However, you can configure syslog to use another location to store the messages. Procedure Open the file that you configured to store the syslog messages. Alternatively, if you use the default syslog configuration, open the /var/log/messages file. Search for new lines including the [RPM] string. 4.9. Extracting RPM content In some cases, for example, if a package required by RPM is damaged, you might need to extract the content of the package. In such cases, if an RPM installation is still working despite the damage, you can use the rpm2archive utility to convert an .rpm file to a tar archive to use the content of the package. Note If the RPM installation is severely damaged, you can use the rpm2cpio utility to convert the RPM package file to a cpio archive. Procedure Convert the RPM file to the tar archive: The resulting file has the .tgz suffix. For example, to create an archive from the bash package, enter:

Commands:
yum install rpmdevtools
rpmdev-setuptree tree ~/rpmbuild/ /home/user/rpmbuild/ |-- BUILD |-- RPMS |-- SOURCES |-- SPECS `-- SRPMS 5 directories, 0 files
rpm -q bash bash-4.4.19-7.el8.x86_64
rpm --eval %{MACRO}
rpm --eval %{_bindir} /usr/bin rpm --eval %{_libexecdir} /usr/libexec
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS
rpmdev-newspec bello bello.spec created; type minimal, rpm version >= 4.11. rpmdev-newspec cello cello.spec created; type minimal, rpm version >= 4.11. rpmdev-newspec pello pello.spec created; type minimal, rpm version >= 4.11.
Name: bello Version: 0.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Hello World example implemented in bash script License: GPLv3+ URL: https://www.example.com/%{name} Source0: https://www.example.com/%{name}/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Requires: bash BuildArch: noarch %description The long-tail description for our Hello World Example implemented in bash script. %prep %setup -q %build %install mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} install -m 0755 %{name} %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/%{name} %files %license LICENSE %{_bindir}/%{name} %changelog * Tue May 31 2016 Adam Miller <maxamillion@fedoraproject.org> - 0.1-1 - First bello package - Example second item in the changelog for version-release 0.1-1
Name: pello Version: 0.1.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Hello World example implemented in Python License: GPLv3+ URL: https://www.example.com/%{name} Source0: https://www.example.com/%{name}/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRequires: python Requires: python Requires: bash BuildArch: noarch %description The long-tail description for our Hello World Example implemented in Python. %prep %setup -q %build python -m compileall %{name}.py %install mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name} cat > %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/%{name} <<EOF #!/bin/bash /usr/bin/python /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.pyc EOF chmod 0755 %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/%{name} install -m 0644 %{name}.py* %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/ %files %license LICENSE %dir /usr/lib/%{name}/ %{_bindir}/%{name} /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.py* %changelog * Tue May 31 2016 Adam Miller <maxamillion@fedoraproject.org> - 0.1.1-1 - First pello package
Name: cello Version: 1.0 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Hello World example implemented in C License: GPLv3+ URL: https://www.example.com/%{name} Source0: https://www.example.com/%{name}/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Patch0: cello-output-first-patch.patch BuildRequires: gcc BuildRequires: make %description The long-tail description for our Hello World Example implemented in C. %prep %setup -q %patch0 %build make %{?_smp_mflags} %install %make_install %files %license LICENSE %{_bindir}/%{name} %changelog * Tue May 31 2016 Adam Miller <maxamillion@fedoraproject.org> - 1.0-1 - First cello package
yum install rpm-build
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/
rpmbuild -bs <specfile>
rpmbuild -bs bello.spec Wrote: /home/admiller/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bello-0.1-1.el8.src.rpm rpmbuild -bs pello.spec Wrote: /home/admiller/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pello-0.1.2-1.el8.src.rpm rpmbuild -bs cello.spec Wrote: /home/admiller/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cello-1.0-1.el8.src.rpm
yum install rpm-build
cd ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/
rpmbuild --rebuild <srpm>
rpmbuild --rebuild bello-0.1-1.el8.src.rpm [output truncated] rpmbuild --rebuild pello-0.1.2-1.el8.src.rpm [output truncated] rpmbuild --rebuild cello-1.0-1.el8.src.rpm [output truncated]
rpm -Uvh ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bello-0.1-1.el8.src.rpm Updating / installing... 1:bello-0.1-1.el8 [100%] rpm -Uvh ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pello-0.1.2-1.el8.src.rpm Updating / installing... ... 1:pello-0.1.2-1.el8 [100%] rpm -Uvh ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cello-1.0-1.el8.src.rpm Updating / installing... ... 1:cello-1.0-1.el8 [100%]
yum install rpm-build
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/
rpmbuild -bb <spec_file>
rpmbuild -bb bello.spec rpmbuild -bb pello.spec rpmbuild -bb cello.spec
rpmlint bello.spec bello.spec: W: invalid-url Source0 : https://www.example.com/bello/releases/bello-0.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bello-0.1-1.el8.src.rpm bello.src: W: invalid-url URL : https://www.example.com/bello HTTP Error 404: Not Found bello.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://www.example.com/bello/releases/bello-0.1.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/bello-0.1-1.el8.noarch.rpm bello.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://www.example.com/bello HTTP Error 404: Not Found bello.noarch: W: no-documentation bello.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bello 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint pello.spec pello.spec:30: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name} pello.spec:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.pyc pello.spec:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/ pello.spec:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/ pello.spec:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.py* pello.spec: W: invalid-url Source0 : https://www.example.com/pello/releases/pello-0.1.2.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pello-0.1.2-1.el8.src.rpm pello.src: W: invalid-url URL : https://www.example.com/pello HTTP Error 404: Not Found pello.src:30: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name} pello.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.pyc pello.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/%{name}/ pello.src:43: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/ pello.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name}/%{name}.py* pello.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://www.example.com/pello/releases/pello-0.1.2.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pello-0.1.2-1.el8.noarch.rpm pello.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://www.example.com/pello HTTP Error 404: Not Found pello.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib pello.noarch: W: no-documentation pello.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/pello/pello.py 0644L /usr/bin/env pello.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pello 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/cello.spec /home/admiller/rpmbuild/SPECS/cello.spec: W: invalid-url Source0 : https://www.example.com/cello/releases/cello-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cello-1.0-1.el8.src.rpm cello.src: W: invalid-url URL : https://www.example.com/cello HTTP Error 404: Not Found cello.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://www.example.com/cello/releases/cello-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cello-1.0-1.el8.x86_64.rpm cello.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://www.example.com/cello HTTP Error 404: Not Found cello.x86_64: W: no-documentation cello.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cello 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
yum install rpm-plugin-syslog
rpm2archive <filename>.rpm
rpm2archive bash-4.4.19-6.el8.x86_64.rpm ls bash-4.4.19-6.el8.x86_64.rpm.tgz bash-4.4.19-6.el8.x86_64.rpm.tgz