CANNONBALL (2 outta 5 stars) Pretty dreary low budget car chase movie starring David Carradine and directed by Paul Bartel who teamed up for the classic "Death Race 2000" the year before. This time out inspiration seems to be have been replaced by desperation. The movie isn't really terrible... but there isn't much of it that you'll remember afterwards. Carradine plays the title character, the hottest and the coolest driver in the world who is determined to win an illegal cross country car race. Well, the plot is pretty much the same as "Death Race" and a lot of the same actors show up... but it's a pretty tepid follow-up. The wit and the satire of the previous movie are missing in action... this movie tries to be funny but it's the same kind of cheap, cornball gags you saw in practically *every* car chase flick in the '70s. The stuntwork is particularly unimpressive as well. The chief rule seems to be: "When in doubt, run someone off the road." Brief cameo appearance by Martin Scorsese and Sylvester Stallone... probably the only time the two will ever work together.


This movie is cheaply made, and is very stupied. If you take it seriously then you will hate this movie. A few drinks latter you will love Premen Watters(the singing cowboy). If you love cars, crashes, and cheap humor rent it. The German auto racer make this movie worth renting all by himself.


This picture was released on July 6 1976 starring David Carradine as Coy Cannonball Buckman, Bill McKinney as Cade Redman and Veronica Hamel as Linda Maxwell. A former employee rips off his own Death Race 2000 in this mindless car-crash saga, containing more twisted metal than a bombed-out steel mill. The nominal storyline concerns an illegal auto race from Los Angeles to New York that promises the winner 100,000 dollars. Coy "Cannonball" Buckman, is the race leader who drags his girlfriend, Linda along for the ride. Linda is not very happy to be the passenger in this race because she has has a job and a boss to answer too. Cade Redman tools around in a loud red Trans Am, while Cannonball's nemesis barrels along in a big, black Plymouth, trying to outsmart Cannonball at every turn and exit ramp. Things start to go wrong as cars start breaking down and you need money to fix them. The only way to fix them is with your sponsor's money but there's no which means no money. I bought this movie because of Veronica Hamel and she was a big disappointment. Even though this movie had a leading actress her performance was not good so I give this movie 4 weasel stars.


What is this about cross-country racing? I saw "The Gumball Rally" and it's mostly comedy and adventure, this one is more high octane. David Carradine who's fresh from "Kung Fu" plays Coy "Cannonball" Buckman, a ex-con who makes this race an important part of his life. Veronica Hamel(before hitting it big as "Hill Street Blues" character, Joyce Davenport) as parole officer, Linda Maxwell. Everybody gets to the spot in California in a coast-to-coast race where anything goes. Scheming and cheating, sabotaging other vehicles, everyone wants the big money. A friend of Coy emulated him, and Coy's brother Bennie(Dick Miller) placed some explosives under a German driver's car. When the truth of the traffic accident surfaces, Linda realized that Coy wasn't a guilty man. His Trans-Am was totaled,and his replacement car is a mean Ford Mustang. The car pileup was sickening, and the young kids help out Linda after Coy's friend was killed. And Coy himself would rather win fare and square, than having the competition eliminated by extreme matters. Looks like Linda was more important to him than the money. And the young kids deserved it more. This movie has got plenty of action, and plenty of laughs, and David Carradine haven't lost his touch in his moves. 3 out of 5 stars


Not sure what to say. i saw nothing at all good about this movie. Not funny, not interesting, not anything. And the "crash scene" at the end might be the most stupid thing I've ever seen in a movie. It lasts forever, as one car after another drives into the wreck. And each one, even the ones going slow, explode like they have a hydrogen bomb in them. The most fake and worst special effects I've ever seen. And it seems like it's never going to end, not realistic at all. The characters are not interesting at all, it was hard just to stay awake through it. I was thinking it might have some connection to the Cannonball Run movies when I first saw it come on, but it doesn't. Don't waste your time watching this pile of crap.


Director Paul Baurtel's follow-up to his cult hit "Death Race 2000" was this pretty awful little action picture that has all the amateurishness of the previous film but about half the budget - which wasn't so high to begin with! It's a crummy-looking, unfunny, unexciting film, but at least it has some beautiful women and some fast cars..... (*1/2)


I would not call this a gripping suspense movie since there are some places that make you laugh when maybe you should not. But if you take the performances of the two colonels and the major general aside, the movie is redeemed two-fold and you end up with some enjoyable entertainment, thanks to Scheider, Prochnow, and Stanton. But, don't expect a realistic post-cold-war scenario. Would two colonels with so many years invested in their careers risk it all just to express personal dislikes of each other? And would the general pussyfoot around so long with an American colonel who's actions could at any time escalate them into a major confrontation? I think not!!! But just watch the movie and you might disagree with this, since all you think about at the time is "will World War III start over a snowball fight?".


I was suckered into paying to see this movie in the theater because of the title and because I like the actors.

For 19 years now, this movie has been my standard by which to judge all terrible films.

There was no excuse for the distribution of this film.

Plodding, meandering, insulting to the intelligence of the viewer, and not a sufficient allegory for the cold war to have made it worth seeing.

The only reason to watch this movie is to see how truly awful a movie can be.


A furiously intense story that takes place shortly after the Cold War where an American colonel (Roy Scheider - "Jaws") who has a troubled past, picks a fight with a high-ranking Soviet military officer, (Jurgen Prochnow - "Das Boot") that nearly escelates into a Tarantino-like standoff. Scheider and Prochnow are both good and so is Harry Dean Stanton ("The Straight Story"), who plays Scheider's superior officer and an old war buddy who is concerned about his friend. Director John Frankenheimer ("Ronin") is smart in making the film go smoothly and I got kick out of the scene where Prochnow and two other Russian officers briefly watch an American (college) football game on t.v., question it, and laugh at it.


When you look through a binocular you see one image... not two! And this film got it right!

Hollywood can't even get this simple fact right and it annoys me immensely. The annoying thing is that directors can get access to so much money and are not intelligent enough to get it right. If they spend a hundred dollars more they could buy a consultant to tell them things like that! But the directors are too dumb! Amazing.

So a big HOORAY for The Fourth War!! The ONLY other film I remember that avoids this Hollywood dumb cliché is The Bridge On The River Kwai.

And that's not all folks. The Fourth War lets the Russians speak Russian. I'm close to tears with enthusiasm! In the Hollywood world where Germans, Russians, Chinese and every alien from outer space speaks American this is groundbreaking. I know that most Americans are too dumb to read subtitles (or rather Hollywood think they are) but it renders authenticity in wast amounts to a movie.

The ridiculous script is totally forgiven on these two grounds!!


THE FOURTH WAR is a menacing movie. Director John Frankenheimer does a superlative job with this and films like the MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, BLACK SUNDAY and RONIN. The novel by Stephen Peters is good and so is the screenplay. Roy Scheider (JAWS) plays Col. Jack KNOWLES who won't give an inch to the Soviet commander Col. Valachev played by Jurgen Prochnow (DAS BOOT). The snowball fight could have happened. I was talking to a retired American Intelligence Operative in the Niagara Region of Ontario and by his tennis court he revealed that KNOLL EAGLE is the codename for the American Shadow President who he believed to be none other than President JACK KENNEDY. That would make President George W Bush the second in command of AMERICA. KNOLL EAGLE comes from the 1963 alleged JFK assassination and the grassy knoll where there had to be a second shooter based on the number of shots fired and their accuracy that could not be duplicated. I believe that snipers are cowardly and advocate non-violence. I would just like to say congratulations President Kennedy on winning the cold war. Jack Knowles sounds close to Jack Kennedy Knoll Eagle. Harry Dean Stanton has a fine performance as General Hackworth. When the Russians and Chinese attack America at the same time will they torture me for calling them cowardly and uncivilized? Hopefully America will hold out and I won't have to find out. My military Intelligence course prepared me for interrogation but not torture. I gave the FOURTH WAR a 9 out of 10 for mentioning the AMERICAN nuclear detterent so directly.


Well, I just got through watching this much-anticipated film (by me) and it didn't disappoint except for one thing: I thought it was a true story. I didn't play close enough attention to the word "inspired" in the title because, unlike the story of Seabiscuit, this isn't what really happened.

It's based on a nice comeback story a real racehorse, Mariah's Storm, which did make a great comeback from a serious injury but not to the extent of what happens here in this movie. This was exaggerated to the hilt for dramatic purposes, but that's okay once you know that because the story is, indeed, "inspirational."

Most important, this is about as nice a modern-day film as you will ever find. There's nary a swear word, hardly even a raised voice. There are nice characters and a sweet, family-friendly tone to it with a tear-in-your-eyes Seabiscuit-type tale and ending.

Dakota Fanning once again demonstrates why she is the greatest child actor of her generation. Kurt Russell is excellent, too. Ole Kurt must be mellowing these days playing subdued nice guys like this. It's good to see. The same goes for Elisabeth Shue. This is a far cry from her role in Leaving Las Vegas. Even Kris Kristofferson holds his tongue in this film! Amazing.

Like Seabiscuit, this also is beautifully filmed. I wonder if any sport is filmed and is just surrounded by all this beauty in real-life, too, like horse racing? It IS "the sport of kings." There is some spectacular scenery in here, much of it in Kentucky and where better to be when filming a horse racing story?

So, if you and your kids - or just you - want to settle in for nice film, and you're looking for a pleasing, nice-looking, feel-good story you absolutely cannot miss with this film. Very highly recommended.


My wife and I saw this movie today, and were very happy to have spent the time and the emotion.

This is a heartwarming experience for virtually any viewer with a soul. Far beyond a simple story about a horse, this film delves in to multi-generational relationships and human frailty. In its relatively short time duration, the film depicted a great deal of real life.

Dakota Fanning is a remarkable actor. It is almost frightening to see someone of her tender years with such screen presence and ability to deliver a range of emotion so convincingly. If only the film industry will refrain from corrupting her - and her support group helps to keep her "real" - she will undoubtedly evolve into an excellent adult performer.

Kurt Russell is a perennial favorite of ours. We both commented on the joy of watching the growth of his career and ability from his child roles of Disney films through his present "mature" stage of career. Whether a husband and father in "Dreamer" or a dysfunctional husband and brother in "Backdraft, he is enjoyable to watch.

Kris Kristofferson as a crusty old horse person with a huge, warm heart, was a nice addition to the film. We have long acknowledge that his acting talent far exceeds his musical prowess.

Last, but not least, there is Elisabeth Shue. Since "Adventures in Babysitting," we have enjoyed her performances. She is beautiful, charming, adept, versatile and willing to take professional risks. It is unfortunate that the film industry does not provide her more good roles for someone of her abilities.

It is pleasing that "Dreamer" - and films of its style - are made. Such entertainment vehicles support a means to keep families bonded. "Dreamer" is a great way for families to spend a couple of hours together.

Don't hesitate to see this film. Open your heart, connect your soul to your brain, and enjoy yourself!


My wife dragged me to this movie and I kinda thought I might enjoy it, so, I didn't fight it too much. Once the movie started and I got into the plot, I was hooked. My wife started crying within the first 15 minutes and she didn't stop until we walked out of the theater!!! It was the good kind of crying... not bad!!! Take the WHOLE family to the classic Disney type story!!! If you have any ability to follow how these types of movies go, then you will know the outcome long before it happens... it doesn't matter because you'll be wanting that outcome and you'll embrace it when it happens!!! Good acting, as always, from Kurt Russell and even Kris Kristofferson showed some range. Young Dakota Fanning has to be one of the most talented actresses of our time!! I could never see her as a 'child actor'... she an actress that just happens to be a child!!! GO SEE THIS MOVIE!!! You won't be sorry!!


I saw this film on September 13th in Indianapolis. I am one of the judges for the Heartland Film Festival that screens films for their Truly Moving Picture Award. A Truly Moving Picture "explores the human journey by artistically expressing hope and respect for the positive values of life." Heartland gave that award to this film.

The setting is the beautiful horse country around Lexington, KY. A dysfunctional horse family falls on hard times. The family includes a grandfather (Kris Kristofferson), a son (Kurt Russell), his wife (Elisabeth Shue), and their daughter (Dakota Fanning). The son is a horse trainer and loses his job abruptly and takes with him a badly injured horse to his shrunken, empty, rundown horse farm.

Just as the horse, Sonador, which is Spanish for Dreamer, struggles to become healthy, the family also struggles to become a caring, loving unit again. The indomitable spirit of the daughter as she cares for the horse forces the family to confront their problems. And ultimately they do face their problems with courage, spirit and even heroism.

The acting in this movie by the family members was superb. But Dakota Fanning deserves a special mention. It seems once a generation there is an outstanding child actor that is believable. She is this generation's child actor.

The cinematography and music score are outstanding. The horse country comes alive and you begin to understand why "the sport of kings" becomes many people's profession.

FYI  There is a Truly Moving Pictures web site where there is a listing of past winners going back 70 years.


I was lucky enough to be able to preview this film on October 6, in Greenville, SC with my wife. While I had seen the previews several months ago for this film and thought it looked pretty good, I went in thinking it would be just another "chick flick". I was wrong. The story-telling was superb and very rarely dragged along, holding the attention well (I never looked at my watch). The acting was very good from all involved and Dakota is cute as ever. The drama was riveting without being over done or heavy-handed. All in all this film is a winner (no puns intended) and great for people of all ages (and genders).


I screened Dreamer: Inspired by a True Story on August 23rd in Washington DC. This beautiful film, a Truly Moving Picture, teaches children that they can achieve their goals despite any obstacles that may stand in their way.

Set in Lexington, Kentucky, this is a story about perseverance and empowerment in the face of hardship. Cale Crane (Dakota Fanning) dreams of having a race horse on her father's farm again. Although the family does not have enough money to purchase a new horse, Cale's father Ben Crane (Kurt Russell) acquires an injured racehorse named Sonador, the Spanish word for "dreamer."

The story that ensues encourages all children to reach high. Despite their economic setbacks, everyone on the Crane farm believes that they can nurse Sonador back to health. Although there are age and cultural differences among the family members and farm workers, they all find inspiration in Cale's unwavering determination. While working towards the goal of healing their injured horse, broken relationships within the family are healed.

In addition to providing an inspirational message, this film also succeeds in vividly depicting a rural lifestyle in which horses and people are closely connected. Children who view this movie can learn about the deep bonds between animals and humans.

Because of the positive messages this film exudes, it has been chosen as the upcoming featured film for a new joint project between the National Collaboration for Youth and Heartland Truly Moving Pictures. The exciting project, F.I.L.M. (an acronym for "Finding Inspiration in Movies and Literature") includes a three step process in which children screen select films, use activity guides for each film, and then partake in service learning projects.


An uplifting, heartwarming movie...inspires one to dream and dream big. It's a must see, especially for the lovers of horses. Rivals the Horse Whisperer as my favorite movie revolving around horses. Kurt Russell is great, as always. Dakota Fanning is a very special young actress, perhaps a greater talent at her age than Drew Barrymore. Kris Kristofferson play his usual gritty character. And last but not least, it's great to see Elisabeth Shue on the silver screen again. She is a natural beauty and a great actress. The movie is very timely in that it involves the Breeder's Cup, which, at the time of this writing, is coming up this weekend. It's a movie for all ages, and if it comes out on DVD before Christmas, it'll make a wonderful gift.


The premise of this movie is so similar to 2003's Seabiscuit, you'd think you're watching yet another biography of a real horse in some extraordinary, inspiring film that might just make you want to head down to the nearest race course and observe a real race.

But Dreamer (or Sonador as the horse is named) takes a slightly different angle in this tale about second chances and comebacks. If compared to Seabiscuit, yes, we have a horse with great potential faced with the troubles of breaking a leg during a competitive race. As with all race horses, this means instant death, as they have no future value, and are bred for the sole purpose of racing.

We also have a superb trainer, Ben Crane, played by Kurt Russell, and the doctor (Holmes Osborne), the written-off jockey (Freddy Rodriguez), the stable-hand (Luis Guzman), etc. But here's where the similarities end. Dreamer is a more personal film, with family friendly characters, like the daughter (Dakota Fanning), the wife (Elizabeth Shue), and the grandfather (Kris Kristofferson). Nursing the horse back to health had actually brought the family closer together, and that in itself makes this film quite cliché in its many "been-there-done-that" before moments to touch.

Dakota Fanning has held her own against "father-figure" heavyweights like Robert De Niro, Denzel Washington, and Tom Cruise, though many would have pointed out that she had rivaled Naomi Watts for the 2005 Scream Queen honors with her performance in War of the Worlds. Here, Fanning has returned to more credible acting, albeit in a safer role.

Dreamer: Inspired by a True Story, is a heartwarming tale about believing in oneself, having dreams, believing that you can achieve, and take action to achieve those dreams. While watching the movie, I can't help but chuckle at the parallels in seeing how my team and I are sticking together, just like those characters, in wanting to see our dream of making a short film, and entering it into competitions (in this case, the Breeder's Cup) come to a reality.

It's that kind of film, an inspiring one. It might be clichéd, the premise might be too good to be true, but hey, success might come to those who dare to dream, believe, and more importantly, do.


Wow, I saw this movie last night and it was amazing! I have always had a love for horses and have been around them for over seven years, but that's not the only reason why I loved "Dreamer" as much as I did.

All the actors and actresses did such a great job in this movie. I have been a fan of Dakota Fanning for a while now, and I think she does well in almost everything she does, but I don't think it would be possible for her to do any better than she did in this movie. She played her character Cale Crane, perfectly. It was obvious throughout the movie that she loved her horse, Sonador, with all of her heart. She would even sneak out at night to feed her Popsicles! In real life, Dakota has her own horse named Goldie, so she was already used to being around horses before she started filming this movie.

Kurt Russel also did an amazing job in this movie. Honestly, I don't think there is any other actor out there that deserved that part more than he did. I've seen Elisabeth Shue (Lily Crane) in another one of her most recent movies, "Hide and Seek," which is a completely different genre of movie, but I thought she did a great job in it, and "Dreamer" as well. Dakota Fanning was also in "Hide and Seek," and did a great job too, as usual.

I didn't even notice one single thing in this movie that I would have changed. It was just so good, and I think there should be more movies like this to be made in the future. Everyone in the theater clapped and cheered when Cale's horse Sonador, crossed the finish line in first place at the Breeder's Cup. "Dreamer" is a movie that anyone can enjoy, so if you are looking for a really, really good, inspirational movie, I highly suggest you go see this one. 10/10.


In Lexington, Kentucky, the horse barn of the family Crane has been empty for years, without any horses, due to the financial difficulties of the family. When the female horse Sonya, a.k.a. Sonador (Dreamer, in Spanish) breaks one foreleg in a race, the owner Palmer (David Morse) decides to sacrifice the animal, but the trainer Ben Crane (Kurt Russell) accepts the injured horse as part of three months salaries owed by Palmer. His daughter Cale (Dakota Fanning) becomes very connected with Sonya, and while the horse is rehabilitated, the wounds in the ties of the Crane family are also healed.

"Dreamer: Inspired by a True Story" is one of those beautiful, positive, optimistic movies, with a magnificent message for families. First, you must never give up your dream; following your dream, no matter how impossible it seems to be, magic may happen. The other one is that families shall always stay united, no matter how difficult the situation seems to be: the union makes the strength. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Sonhadora" ("Dreamer")


I must admit that the real reason that I went to see Dreamer was because large parts of the film were filmed in and around Lexington, KY, my hometown. While I am a HUGE horse-racing fan, I cringe a little at sappy, feel-good, cheesy stories involving 11-year-old girls. And so, I almost passed on Dreamer because of the trailers with Dakota Fanning.

I was pleasantly surprised though. In fact, Dreamer had far, far fewer moments that could be considered sappy or cloying than the much more publicized and well-regarded Seabiscuit.

Dakota Fanning is a fantastic actor, and she plays the part of Cale Crane beautifully, only once (when Dreamer is reclaimed by her father as a surprise) striking a false note of over-enthusiastic cheesiness. The rest of the time, Fanning plays the horse-crazy, idealistic, and yet surprisingly level-headed Cale to a tee.

Although it is true that the story follows a fairly predictable story arc, it is plainly clear that the writers and director are horse-racing fans. Despite the very economical story-telling (the movie almost felt too short and rushed from one scene to another), the story captured many of the fabulous quirks of horse-racing in Kentucky (not least the reference to the Saudi prince who flies his private 737 to Lexington to see his horse run against his brother's horse--the *real* sheik of Dubai has flown his 737 into Lexington for years, where he parks it on the tarmac at the airport across Versailles road from Keeneland...everyone *knows* when the sheik is in town to see or buy his horses).

The cinematography captures the horse country around Lexington and Keeneland superbly--they look far better (and more realistic) here, unfussed with and pure, than they did in their limited exposure in Seabiscuit.

The best testimony to the film's success as a crowd pleaser was its reception on a Saturday night, several weeks after the movie's release (mid-November), in a North Carolina theater. The majority of the audience were NOT horse-crazy adolescent girls, but rather adult couples, who spontaneously broke into applause at Sonya's triumph in the Breeder's Cup Classic, and who lingered at the end credits, clearly hoping for even more. (Actually, an infertile 3-year-old mare has got little ahead of her except to continue racing... How about a sequel where Sonador's earnings allow the Crane's to attempt to restore the family farm to its mysterious and mythical former glory?) All in all, a movie that promises a story about a horse overcoming the odds and a family coming together which delivers resoundingly and convincingly on both counts.

(There are a handful of minor goofs in the movie in terms of accuracy, but they do not detract from the overall film. More amusing than anything else is the scene in the pasture where Sonador, who is supposed to be a filly, is very, VERY clearly played by a gelding.)


Much has been made in these pages about this film, as far as not being a true story. This inspired account about an injured horse the Crane family bring back to life, is one of the most engaging films about the racing sport in memory. Of course, this is no "Seabiscuit", but the film makers are not claiming it to be.

John Gantins, the director and writer of this picture, knows what to give the public. Aside from the heart warming feeling in the film, he was blessed with a cast that does justice to the material. The love of a young girl for a horse, that by all accounts should have been shot because of the injured it suffered during an accident, is the stuff that makes good family movies.

"Dreamer, Inspired by a True Story" is totally dominated by Dakota Fanning's presence in the film. Miss Fanning, is a luminous young actress the camera adores. She is a natural, as she shows in this film. Dakota Fanning has the uncanny ability of being real at all times. Her love for Sonador and her determination to take the horse to the Breeders' race consumes her, as well as her family.

Kurt Russell is also good as Cale's father. He is a man of principle who loves what he does best, bringing horses to their full potential. Kris Kristofferson plays the grandfather who wants Cale to succeed and in the process he is reunited with his son. Elizabeth Shue is seen as a mother who has to work to help meet ends when her husband loses his job. David Morse, one of the best character actors around doesn't have much to do, and the same goes for the wonderful Luis Guzman, playing one of the stable men.

The film is recommended for families with children. Mr. Gantins created an excellent entertainment that will satisfy young and old because it shows a young girl with a firm resolution to do the right thing for the horse she loves.


Dreamer was a heart warming and wonderful movie.... My Daughter and left the theater with a "Great" Feeling. During the movie you find yourself cheering for the good guys to prevail. The whole cast did a wonderful job.....my daughter was so inspired by the moral of the story. You have to believe in yourself and others. The Characters in the movie were so believable and it looked like they truly enjoyed making this movie.

It's about time we start seeing more inspiring movies..... I really hope this movie does well at the box office and DVD. We will buy the DVD when it comes out.

I hope Hollywood will take heed and start making more movies that will inspire us to believe and be better people.


I fell in-love with this movie from beginning to end,the first time i watched it i closed my eyes in the beginning when i saw the horse "Sonador" fall,i cried through this whole movie and at the same time,had a wonderful smile on my face..Dakota fanning is just wonderful, all of my favorite actors in this movie, i wish it could have been longer and shown more of "Sonador's" recovery etc,,but the last 10minutes,the last part of the race i could feel the uplifting experience of "Sonador"across the finishing line,a baby could watch this it is just that compatible for families.this movie deserves an academy..so needless to say whenever it comes on,and i have also taped it, i have to watch it again and again.just to see the bad guys in it,if there are such things in this,loose...I fell in-love with the sheik when he spoke to Dakota about her horse winning,i would have loved to have seen them all sitting together tho at the races.the sheik the cranes and the wonderful Spanish horsey handler..it did my heart so good to see the Prince,stand up and acknowledge "Cale" and "sonador" in the winners circle...thanks for letting me express these feelings..god bless to all. "Irene"


I thought this was a great movie, for fans of all ages. And I think Dakota Fanning is a sweet girl with an awesome acting future ahead of her. I think it was wonderful that they changed the role of the child from a boy to a girl just for her. She made this film, made it work and made you believe. It's a feel good film. It teaches patience and perseverance. It shows kids and adults alike what can come from hard work. I thought it was a very inspiring film. Made me remember what it was like to be a kid, when everything was possible. See this movie, you won't regret it...unless you have a heart of stone. It made me treasure the moments between a father and a daughter, having lost my dad this year. I miss him and I wish we'd had a bonding moment like the ones in the film. And it was good to see Kurt Russell again. He's always been a favorite of mine. And now I can add another movie to my list of all time faves.


My wife loves horses, so it was inevitable this movie would eventually come home with her from the rental place. She insisted I watch it, and I am glad she did. The story is simple and predictable, but still fun and very entertaining. Kurt Russell does a great job of making horse trainer and father Ben Crane real and believable, and Dakota Fanning is incredible. The kid must have been born in a theater. Add Elizabeth Shue as the mom, Kris Kristofferson as the grand-dad, and David Morse as the bad guy and you have a pretty impressive cast for a family oriented film. If I have a grand-daughter some day, I will get this DVD and watch it again with her.


Quality goreless movies are hard to find. How often can we watch people who are cut open, shot, guts spewing...? This movie has none of that. It is a precious story of realities dramatic in their own right, and inspiring without the gore of other films. I think movies should be inspiring... and Dreamer does just that. Inspire. Dakota Fanning is phenomenal. That child is far too skilled for her own good. She takes on the depth of the character and brings a reality to the screen rarely found by child actors. Kurt Russell for any 80's child is a classic and has wonderful chemistry on screen with his on screen daughter. Chris Christopherson, although shockingly older than he was with Barbara Streisand plays a role untouchable by other actors. The on screen relationships have depth, the plot stirs the audience, and for anyone interested in "good film" - this movie is a must see.


I am not ashamed to admit it here, but this is one of my all time favorite movies. Kurt Russell and Kris Kristofferson are great together. Very little cussing, lots of love, nothing objectionable, and Manny's faith in God all make for a great family film.

In addition, I have loved Elizabeth Shue since Karate Kid. I could look at her all day.

One of my favorite parts in the film is where Kurt and Dakota are discussing Sonador's run that they just had witnessed. Kurt says something about how well she did in spite of her being big, referring to the horse's weight. Dakota looks at him with a slight smirk and replies "What do you mean?" Kurt refers to the Popsicles that Dakota had been feeding the horse. The scene has Dakota looking in the other direction (away from the camera). This whole scene was unrehearsed and was a practical joke by Kurt on Dakota, which worked so well, the director/writer left it in the film. That's what great films are made of.


This movie is OUTSTANDING in every sense of the word! It is a must-see & for me, will be a must-buy.

It is a movie for ALL AGES.

RUN....FLY...get there as fast as you can to see, rent, or buy this movie! Every actor is wonderful & Dakota Fanning has once again "stolen the show".

It's also great seeing Kurt Russell & Kris Kristofferson back in the movies.

Elisabeth Shue is darling as always! This movie made me want to go out & get a horse & I don't care for horses.

Thanks DreamWorks Pictures for giving us a Fantastic PG movie.

This movie proves that entertainment doesn't have to have profanity, nudity, or violence to be a HIT!


We did not hesitate to accept the offer of previewing "Dreamer" since both my dad and my husband have owned and raced thoroughbreds. We were not disappointed with the story of what every owner and trainer dreams about. Although the movie is billed as based on a true story, no information is readily available about how much is true or from what the author got his inspiration. As with other "truth-based" films, I came away curious to know more, even though I suspect much of it is far-fetched. However having said that, "Dreamer" is a very, very enjoyable movie that the whole family can watch. If you've ever had even a fleeting desire to own a horse as a kid or an adult, this movie won't disappoint you either.


We start all of our reviews with the following information. My wife and I have seen nearly 100 movies per year for the past 15 years. Recently, we were honored by receiving lifetime movie passes to any movie any time at no cost! So we can see whatever we want whenever we want. The point of this is that CRITICS count for ZERO. Your local critics or the national critics like Ebert are really no different than you or me. The only difference is that they get to write about the movie and are forced to see hundreds of movies whether they want to or not.Therefore, it is our belief that if you get your monies worth for two hours of enjoyment that is good enough for us! We NEVER EVER listen or read the critics. We only care about our friends and those who we know like the same things as us. Well enough about that. As to this movie, it is extremely wonderful for everyone especially the kids. We loved it. Dakota Fanning is destined to be one of the top actresses of all time and she is only 11? Every movie she makes is simply the best. She is one in a million. The supporting actors in the movie are equal to the task. Kurt Russell and Elizabeth Shue (It was great to see her again) are extremely pleasurable to watch. So go on your own or with the kids it is a lot of fun.


Dreamer is a fantastic film for all ages. It has humour and also has the amazing ability to make you cry - you can really feel yourself becoming one with the film. It's storyline is amazing and the quality is amazing. I really recommend this film to everybody, especially horse lovers for it gives you an even stronger love for these creatures. Dreamer is highly inspirational and the feeling you have once the film is over is unique. Its almost as if you can achieve your wildest dreams. This is by far one of my favourite movies. The actors in this film play their parts beautifully, you can really bond with the story as each line is said with extreme emotion. It has everything that one person can ask for. However, a warning, this film WILL make you cry! Glorious, happy ending.


My wife and I expected a predictable root-for-the-good-guys movie ala Rocky, Karate Kid and all, which this is. However, this is so well done, that it didn't matter to us that we were 10 steps ahead of the film. All of the cast and crew did excellent jobs, and you all pulled this off with a very high degree of professionalism. Go see it!! It's a movie that people of all ages will enjoy, and I'd recommend it to anyone and everyone. This is the level of film quality that we expect when we pay full price for a movie ticket. Great work Kurt, Elisabeth, Dakota, Kris, and the entire cast and crew!!! You all played wonderful characters, and the entire audience at our screening applauded as the closing credits rolled.


I saw this movie as I had seen a good review from IMDb itself....moreover I was compelled to see this film as Dakota Fanning was in this movie........even though Kurt Russell was in this movie..........I expected it to be her movie and it was..........She is an amazing talent whom we had seen in I am sam,Hide and seek,war of the worlds,push,winged creatures............without much effort she delivers the beautiful performances and it makes me wonder..............The story has inspired me and has made me realise that to achieve anything we must believe.............even when odds are against us..............this film brings out true value of relationship and will to uphold the most thing in which you believe.................


Truth be told I have always been a fan of Dakota Fanning's films (Asides The Cat In The Hat, bad film) so I was flicking through the T.V channels and saw this and at first I wasn't really bothered about watching it but as I was bogged down by an awful flu I thought "Why not" I really liked it! I didn't know who Kurt Russell was (I'm sorry I thought he was the wrestler Kurt Angle!) obviously Elisabeth Shue is a very good actress, Kris Kristofferson is a legend as always (Loved him in Hulk) and Oded Fehr was good although in it quite briefly (Much better acting than in the awful Resident Evil series) and Dakota Fanning was yet again outstanding.

When it was introduced it said "Next up is Dreamer a tearjerker/melodrama" and thought "Oh no, I'm gonna cry!" It's not a sad film in a upsetting way it's a nice film. To be honest I don't see the interest in horse racing, horses to me should be free to run wild and racing them is quite harsh to me. I didn't cry (thank God I kept my masculinity) but I finished the film in a really good mood. I suppose if a film can do that then happy days.

The only criticism is that Elisabeth Shue had a small role.

Dreamer is about a stable owner Ben Crane (Russell) who has no horses. He has a wife Lilly (Shue) a daughter Cale (Fanning) and a dad who is referred to as Pop (Kristofferson). They have two Mexican workers (I forget their names). A prince (Oded Fehr) of some far away country (I think Dubai) races a horse (the main horse, Sonador or Dreamer) who gets injured badly. Ben buys and heals the horse and Cale later adopts the horse and races it (I'm saying no more!) It's a good family film which I oddly enjoyed (even though it's certainly not my style of film). I'd recommend it to anyone who likes animals (horses) or people who like stories about people who never give up (of which it's a great example) 8/10


This is such a beautiful movie. I could go on and on about how good it is but I don;t want to bore anyone.

"Splash" is the story of a love between a new york Bachelor and a mermaid he meets in Cape Cod. She saves him from drowning and eventually meets up with him in the big apple. He doesn't know she is a mermaid so basically the rest of the movie is about her trying to conceal the fact that she is not human,while they are in the meantime falling in love. Tom Hanks, Daryl Hannah, Eugene Levy and John Candy give fantastic performances and the New York images are just breathtaking:)

Katrina


From Tom's latest foray into dramatic excellence (Captain Miller) to his first big smash, er "Splash". There could not be any greater difference between this fishy feature and Mr. Hanks' performance in "Saving Private Ryan". Here Ron Howard, following on from his "Night Shift" success, takes us on a journey of fantasy as Tom's New York fruiterer has his life turned upside down by a real life mermaid.

The idea from Lowell Ganz, Babalo Mandel and Bruce Jay Friedman is as 'fish-out-of-water' as they come. The resulting script is not all that good though. Ron Howard does keep things very jovial, and this, along with Tom Hanks' infectious turn as the love-lorn mermaid admirer, probably makes the pic the reasonable entertainment that it is.

Daryl Hannah is a little wooden in the movie that made her a household name, and John Candy plays Tom's slovenly brother. Eugene Levy plays the obsessed scientist who pursues "Madison" all over New York.

Sunday, December 13, 1998 - T.V.


This was an early film in the career of Tom Hanks, one of his first successful movies. He would go on to be somewhat hit and somewhat miss throughout the 1980's and become more of a guaranteed hit maker in the 1990's and 2000's. Here he stars alongside a very attractive Daryl Hannah in a nice little romantic comedy that at one point gets rather risqué for a PG rated movie during a certain emerging at the Statue of Liberty scene. The film also features SCTV alum John Candy and Eugene Levy both of whom are hilarious in this one. Candy as Hanks' slightly sex obsessed brother and Levy as a researcher who is a bit of a jerk. The story involves Hanks' character who has an accident as a child and falls into the ocean only to encounter a little girl mermaid. Flash years later and he is all grown up and he ends up having an accident at sea and ends up unconscious underwater only to be rescued by a very beautiful lady who later turns up in New York and the two of them hit it off swimmingly. Well of course the lady is the little girl mermaid and Levy's character who also encountered is determined to expose her for the half woman and half fish that she is. Nice movie with good comedy, I loved the moron twins and the secretary who got some lightening to the head. Some of the story seems a bit out there though and at times the movie gets a bit to sappy and the ending kind of did not make any sense. Overall though I thought it was rather good. They would later make a sequel that was a made for television sequel, but I have no urge to see that one.


I will admit there have been some romantic comedies I have not liked, and others I have. One thing for certain though, I adore Splash! It is a beautiful, charming and sweet romantic comedy that has quickly become a favourite of mine. For instance the whole film is beautifully shot, with lovely cinematography and stunning underwater sequences. Plus New York looks absolutely gorgeous here.

The music is also delightful. The song in the end credits was so beautiful, I nearly cried. Maybe it was also to do with how it is sung; the vocals were sublime, and never spoiled the mood of the song. The script is funny and touching, more the latter than the former, but who cares? There are still some funny parts of the movie. The direction from Ron Howard was secure and focused throughout.

There were so many charming scenes in Splash! The ending certainly was exactly that, and a bit of a tear jerker as well. Another charming scene that springs to mind was the ice skating scene. Not only how it was filmed, but also the music featured. A perfect choice of music for that particular scene, the Skaters Waltz. I also thought that the movie's length was perfect, and the pacing was just fine.

And I can't write this review without mentioning the performances. Every single person did a superb job. Tom Hanks is charismatic and likable enough and was perfectly cast as Allan Bauer, a successful businessman who falls in love with a beautiful mermaid named Maddison. Speaking of Maddison, didn't Daryl Hannah look gorgeous here? She is a generally ignored actress, and she was positively charming. Eugene Levy plays a sort of bad guy, and he is funny as well as detestable. However, the film's humour comes from the late John Candy who is hilarious as Allan's brother.

All in all, I adore this movie. Out of all the romantic comedies I have seen, this has to be the most charming and possibly irresistible. I have been vocal before about not trying to take IMDb ratings to heart, but 6.2 is too low for this movie. It does deserve a higher rating than that. While not the best movie ever made, it is certainly one of my all time favourite movies for a number of reasons. 10/10 Bethany Cox


I must have seen 'Splash' a dozen or more times as a child of 8 or 9 and not since. It's been my pleasure tonight to watch it with my 8 year old boy, all the scenes I remembered and some of those I didn't came flooding back and we had a real hoot.

Howard manages to create a whimsical comedy/fantasy but it's not without depth too. Hanks, in one of his earliest roles is superb as 'unlucky in love' Allen, who in the end shows that love has no boundaries. Daryl Hannah was even more beautiful than I remember and, particularly in the early scenes where she doesn't speak English shows why she was perfectly cast for the role. Eugene Levy and John Candy add the humour and make it an all round joyous watch.

I won't pretend it hasn't got 'flaws'. I mean why doesn't she just climb out of the tank, dry herself off and walk outta there, but this isn't and doesn't pretend to be some kind of statement film. I simply can't judge it that way For me, it was a childhood classic, and now is simply a classic in its own right


Every time I see this movie, It stirs something in me. It moves me and it takes me back to a time when things where simple and a good story could be told without the bells and whistles and still move you years after. This fairy tale is one of those films that no sequels can conquer. It invokes a nostalgia that will make you regress back to your childhood. If you were a kid like I was when this film first came out. I saw it many times. Now I ownd the soudtrack (record cause up to today I have not found the CD soundtrack to this film) and the DVD with all the great behind the scenes footage. Tom Hanks has star quality acting here and the chemistry that Daryl and Tom have are blown out of the water! A really truly wonderful film!


I have of course watched this movie several times. I don't get tired of the jokes, the satire and general comedy. It always seems so fresh to me.

It is a light romantic comedy, with a young Tom Hanks, lonely, going through life with mismatched relationships, until by chance he meets a mermaid.........and then the film progresses from there.

The acting by the leading characters seems so natural; they are not trying too hard to be slapstick funny, but through the great dialog, direction and timing, they make it a thoroughly enjoyable film to watch. But for the nudity, I am sure this would be enjoyed by all ages, and background.

There are some ironic parts, since the movie was made over two decades ago. The speech by the tour guide about the statue of Liberty, and a few other indications in that direction. That Gritty hard commercialized New York could have another side to it.

In one sense what is funny is a highly personal issue. For me anyway mermaids and the beauty of Daryl Hannah has special significance. The very first girl I fell in love with looked vaguely like her, back 22 years ago.

The message about love and relationships is eternal, and it was done in a very enjoyable way.

So thank you again Ron Howard and ALL the others.


Before both Ron Howard and Tom Hanks became known for making gooey message movies, they teamed up on this very likable comedy.

Hanks plays a man searching for love and finds it in the form of Daryl Hannah. Unfortunately, his dream woman has the habit of growing a tail and gills whenever she gets wet, though in Hanks's world, this isn't necessarily a deal breaker. Eugene Levy is a scientist who wants to capture the mermaid for his own fame, and John Candy is Hanks's loud-mouth brother.

Full of memorable scenes, like Hannah scarfing down a lobster, shell and all, at a posh restaurant. Hanks's reply to the disapproving looks of the diners sitting near them: "She's really hungry."

Grade: B+


Tom Hanks really broke through in the movie. He showed that he truly was the best pick for that movie. He also showed that he is the best in the business. His movies from this point on just get better and better. The story line is cute and likable and has something that everyone can somewhat relate to. It proves the old saying "You can't help who you fall in love with." I thought that the acting was really well done not only by Hanks but by everyone. It was also well written. It was well cast. And over all a wonderful film. One to be enjoyed by all ages and in all times. The movie is one of the best movies that I've seen from it's time period and genre. Also one of my favorite Tom Hanks movies. If you have never seen this movie, don't walk, run to go rent it and watch by yourself or with a loved one. Its a movie that everyone can enjoy no matter their age. It's a fun movie that holds special moments for everyone. I love how it shows that each character is very well developed by the writers and the actors. It's an over all awesome movie. And by far one of the best movies ever to be made. It is different each time you see it too. You notice something about the movie that you never noticed before every time you watch it. I would highly recommend to any one if you haven't seen this movie to go out and see it. But more it's a great movie on things that are real, true and touch your heart. The movie is true to the heart and soul of it. Its beautifully made and acted.So young or old, male or female, go see the movie. It's truly one of the best you'll ever see.


OK, so it's perhaps the definitive fish-out-of-water story (Ho, Ho!) but what really makes this work hasn't a whole lot to do with the properties of marine life. Sans fin, essentially what we've got here is too shy people whose cultural differences make it hard for them to find love together. When you break it down like that, it isn't so unusual after all, and it's actually mighty touching. Who but a complete cynic wouldn't love a charming fable that tells us we can sometimes get what we're searching for, in the end?! It may be a funny line, but we should also be able to identify with Allen's pain when he tries to come to terms with the fact that his love match is a... fish.

It's this smattering of pathos which takes a funny scenario and elevates it toward becoming a classic relationship movie. Anyone who's ever been confused about what they want from life should gain a few knowing laughs from this as it floats pleasantly along. So what are you waiting for? Hop right in, the water is fine!


Splash (1984): Tom Hanks, Daryl Hannah, John Candy, Eugene Levy,, Shecky Greene, Dody Goodman, Richard B. Shull, Bobby Di Cicco, Howard Moris, Patrick Cronin, David Knell, Tony Di Benedetto, Charles Walker, Rnoald F. Hoiseck, Joe Grifasi, Lowell Ganz, Maurice Rice, Cheryl Howard, Pierre Epstein, Valerie Wildman, Jack Denton, Nick Cinardo, Fil Formicola, Clare Peck, Jodi Long, Amy Ingersoll, Jack Hallett, Bill Smitrovich, Nancy Raffa, Jason Late, David Nelson, Jill Jacobson, Vincent Jerosa, Charles Mitchell, Nick Vallelonga...Director Ron Howard, Screenplay Brian Grazer, Bruce Jay Friedman, Lowell Ganz.

From 1984, this is Ron Howard's romantic comedy inspired by the beloved children's fairy tale The Little Mermaid, even before the beloved Disney film took hold of everyone's notion of mermaid-and-male romance. It stars a young Tom Hanks, before his success as an actor, at a time when he was doing mostly comedy. He plays Allen Bauer, a New York boy who as a child fell off a boat and nearly drowned but was rescued by a mysterious mermaid (Daryl Hannah). Years later as an adult, he and his brother Freddie (John Candy) reside and work in New York City as product shipping men by a pier. As fate would have it, Allen reunites with the beautiful mermaid. Lost, confused, mute and nude, he takes her in as a guest in his apartment and later as a lover. She learns English through watching television and avoids revealing her true identity as a mermaid. When she is out of water, she is human (with legs) and when she is wet, she becomes a mermaid. Now, for today's young audience, one will note the similarities to the recent film "Aquamarine". Turns out Aquamarine is inspired by this film, but Splash is the greater film. The screenplay, the work of three talents, is witty, comedic and yet touchingly romantic. Despite the fantasy element, and even fantasy-within-fantasy (the mermaid couldn't talk and then learned English after one day at Bloomingdale's ?) is still a work of complete order and balance. We really do believe that this is logically happening in 1980's New York City. Ron Howard's direction is equally superb. Tom Hanks is doing a fine job, but he is not doing anything challenging. Neither is John Candy, who is clearly just doing the thing he was best known for. But we have to take in mind that this was not a serious romance and it was the first of many romantic comedies that would gradually take over film. The 1980's saw many romantic comedies that would become classics. Moonstruck with Cher for instance. Unfortunately, Splash did not make a big splash at the time of its release. The ending was a bit of a surprise and too sugary-sweet as Tom Hanks leaves the mortal world behind for her. So while this film is not a classic per se, it is a fine document of 80's comedy. And they used to make them a lot better than they do now. This is a lovely romantic film and one that can be appreciated by the whole family. With music by Lee Holrdige that is very moving and splendid cinematography by Donald Peterman. This is, by the way, also quite a date movie.


Before Ron Howard concentrated his energy on making films that are very messagey and thought-provoking (even if he doesn't always succeed), back at the beginning of his career he was a little more wild and adventurous. Films like Night Shift and Grand Theft Auto were rather more zanier than anything he does nowadays. But the film that propelled him to the A-list of directors was Splash.

Splash also feels different from Ron Howard's films of recent years. This is a film made with a great deal of zest and obvious fun on Howard's part. Its a simple but magical fairytale that you really grow to love. It also marked the first of Howard's associations with Tom Hanks. A friendship that still continues today with hits like the superb Apollo 13 and the completely overrated Da Vinci Code.

There are not many live-action films about mermaids, which makes Splash rather unique. Its not a perfect film. It has a few flaws, its a little too lightweight and the ending is slightly odd but its also a fun way to pass the time.

Allan Bauer (Hanks) co-manages a fruit & veg market with his brother Freddie (The late and great John Candy). He's longed for love in his life ever since he was rescued from drowning as a boy by a mermaid. He's never forgotten the incident. And neither has she.

After Allan is dumped by his girlfriend, he goes back to Cape Cod to be alone. The place where he met the mermaid. But when he gets into trouble, he is rescued by the same one. Only now she's a beautiful grownup mermaid (wonderfully played by a perfectly cast Daryl Hannah).

Allan goes back to New York and she follows. When on dry land, she has legs. But if she ever gets wet, she turns back into a mermaid. She names herself Madison (after the street) and starts a relationship with Allan that blossoms into true love. But trouble looms on the horizon from an obsessed scientist Dr Walter Kornbluth (Eugene Levy) who wants to expose Madison to the world.

Splash is made with such a bubbly and infectious cheer its almost impossible to dislike. Here's your chance to see Tom Hanks at the beginning of his career before he became a favourite with the Oscar crowd. Its quite nice to see him in a part where he's just out to have fun. Big is still his best film performance of the 80s (and 90s and 00s!) but Splash has him on good form.

And John Candy is quite the scene stealer as the boisterous and larger than life Freddie. He's obviously having a good time in this film. Playing a part not that far removed from the wild partying he indulged in real life. Although Candy is good, there are moments of painful anguish with foreknowledge of what was to come for him.

But the shining light of the entire film is the lovely and criminally underrated Daryl Hannah. Madison is a part she was born to play. Its hard to imagine any other woman more suited to the part of a mermaid than Daryl Hannah. With her long golden hair, statuesque figure, shiny baby blues and natural beauty she is just captivating.

Not only is she physically matched to the role, but Hannah has the right personality too. Sometimes Daryl Hannah can seem a little spacy in her film roles, but its exactly that quality that makes her so perfect in the part of Madison. She brings a child-like sense of wonder and astonishment that makes her a very appealing screen presence, and she even has a majestic grace in the underwater scenes (which are beautifully photographed by the way).

The real fun to be had is Madison navigating her way through a world she doesn't really understand. She eats lobster ravenously, she thinks nothing of walking through crowds stark naked, and absorbs knowledge from television where she picks up the human language in a matter of hours. Without Hannah, Splash might have been considerably less than it is.

But not everything about Splash works. The subplot concerning Eugene Levy's character feels unnecessary. All his attempts to expose Madison end the same way to the point of repetitiveness. And his character has quite an abrupt change halfway through. He goes from being an obsessed, obnoxious paranoid man to a person who sympathises with Madison's plight and helps her escape. Its a change that doesn't quite ring true.

And the ending left me a little puzzled. I could understand Allan wanting to be with Madison. But I couldn't quite believe he would leave everything behind to live with her under the sea. Its a slightly strange climax that reminded me of a similar situation in the time-travel romance Kate & Leopold. I just couldn't accept what I was seeing.

Nevertheless, Splash is a bouncy and very appealing comedy. One of Ron Howard's best films, and thanks to the cast (but mostly Hannah) it stays afloat and never sinks. So take the plunge!


Splash is a fabulous movie that is truly touching to the heart. It is not just about a mermaid who is trying to find her way in a modern world that she does not understand, but it is about true love and the hardships that come along with it. (There's even more hardships because she's a MERMAID!!!) From Bloomingdales to the bottom of the sea, this movie constantly finds ways to make you burst out laughing, while also making you burst out in tears! The leading actors and actresses do a remarkable job; some being Tom Hanks as the man in love and Daryl Hannah as the beautiful and hilarious mermaid. I also must say that Daryl Hannah's tail looks stunningly real, with so many details that every time you watch it you notice something new. That can also be said for the entire film! Splash is a movie that, simply put, reaches above and beyond. It is great for all ages, because I am twelve!


True, "Splash" is pretty silly, but it's impossible not to like. The plot of course has unfulfilled clerk Allen Bauer (Tom Hanks) meeting up with a mermaid (Daryl Hannah) who turns his life upside down. Much of the movie's humor derives from Allen's brother Freddie's (John Candy) goof-ball antics - namely when he drops coins and later speaks Swedish - and nerdy scientist Walter Kornbluth's (Eugene Levy) chronic bad luck. Another great scene is when the mermaid identifies her sea name before choosing Madison.

All in all, this affirms Ron Howard as a director who always has some ideas. This movie really does make a splash!


Being a sucker for anything 80's I rate this film probably higher than it deserves. It is still alotta fun though. The performances are OK -expectedly so by a young Hanks and Daryl Hannah. Eugene Levy actually is pretty funny as the Mad disregarded scientist. Enjoyed people's constant berating and disregard for him The running humor with him spraying women with water and getting punched out with bad sound effects is classically great and cheesy. Splash is a modern fairy tale type movie with all the music and atmosphere of mid-80s New York. The movie runs a briskly from start to finish. It is by no means an important movie, but rather one that you can watch on a rainy afternoon or enjoy again if you haven't seen it for awhile. Worth buying if cheap.


It has been 21 years since this great comedy/romance movie was made staring heaps of really great actors and actress like the dam great actor Tom Hanks,The really funny John Candy from the heaps funny movie Uncle Buck,Daryl Hannah and Eugene Levy.

Eugene Levy does a good job at playing a scientist in this movie called Walter Kornbluth who is trying to catch the mermaid (Daryl Hannah) by chasing her around New York City to trow water on her which turns her from human back into a mermaid.

Over all this this is a must watch movie and my rating is a big 7 out of 10.


I just watched the last half-hour of this movie on cable TV. It's a likable bit of romantic froth, worthy as a step-off point for Tom Hanks and Ron Howard to move on to bigger and better things. I think I saw Viggo Mortensen (from "Lord of the Rings" fame) in a bit part. It's in that scene where the scientist with the mustache goes to see Madison in her tank, and is greeted with a big surprise (she is not there). He is accompanied by a few other men, and it looked like the future Aragorn was one of them. I can't be sure of this, because I checked the cast list on the IMDb listing, and his name wasn't there. Can anyone verify if it's Viggo in that scene?


This movie really brought a fairy tale type story to life. A must see for everyone. I guess this film obviously makes for a great date movie. This is an excellent romantic comedy about a man and a mermaid who fall in love for each other in a modern fairy tale. This film was one of Tom Hanks' earliest hits that made him the huge superstar that he is today. Co-star Daryl Hannah, who plays Madison the mermaid, became herself a huge star from this film, but now times have changed in her film career, which has faded during the 1990s, which is sad. She is a great actress. John Candy plays Tom Hanks' older brother with Eugene Levy playing a crazy scientist who tries to prove that mermaids exist. These two provide some of the film's hilarious comedic moments.

The romantic chemistry between Hanks' Allen Bauer and Hannah's Madison are just well done. Their characters' relationship just becomes true romance throughout the entire film. When Madison eventually gets caught as a mermaid, Allen realizes that Madison is the one true love that he can never lose. Allen, along with his brother and the crazy scientist, band together to rescue her. Later, Allen realizes that Madison was the little girl mermaid that rescued him when he was a young boy in the film's opening flashback sequence.

Splash was directed by Ron Howard, who is, of course, one of Hollywood's great filmmakers. A movie about a mermaid has to be good, and Splash does this so well. Tips off to the crew of this movie who made it so real. The underwater sequences are well done, as well as Daryl Hannah herself as the mermaid. She is just utterly believable as a mermaid! I must say that she is just so sexy in the rubber mermaid tail suit. She swims in it so well! I really thought that she played Madison to perfection! I can really enjoy a movie about a mermaid nowadays.

On one other note, most people probably don't know this, but Splash was followed up by a Disney TV movie sequel in 1988 that aired in two parts on the ABC network on what used to be a show called "The Disney Sunday Movie". The sequel was called "Splash, Too" and starred Todd Waring as Allen Bauer and Amy Yasbeck (movies "Problem Child" 1 and 2, "The Mask", "Pretty Woman", "Robin Hood: Men In Tights", and TV's "Wings") as Madison Bauer, now married from a Neptune ceremony. This sequel has Allen and Madsion come back to New York from their island hideaway to help Allen's brother Freddie (played by Donovan Scott) save Bauer Produce from going out of business. Madison has her own agenda later on as she finds a dolphin she knows from her past, named Salti, captured by another crazy scientist for study. Not a great sequel of course (as sequels usually are) but it was sort of nice to know that Allen and Madison had another adventure together. There were some funny moments in the movie. It was particularly challenging to see Madison cope with suburban life and trying to understand how to be a housewife. I wasn't bothered that much with the recasting of new actors as these characters either. I did like Amy Yasbeck's portrayal of Madison in this sequel. She too swims and looks nice in a mermaid fish tail as well! A worthy successor to Daryl Hannah in her own right. Some people who have seen Splash, Too think that its even better than the original film. And to others, its an awful sequel that doesn't compare to the original. Some folks even think that Amy Yasbeck's portrayal of Madison is even better than Daryl Hannah's! Mixed reviews none the less. Unfortunately, this sequel is not available on home video to my knowledge.


I've never enjoyed romance as a genre, but ever since I saw this movie ages ago, I've been enamored of it. Tom Hanks is absolutely adorable (moreso than in Big, in my opinion), and although I almost always have more respect for the male than the female character in movie relationships, Daryl Hannah manages to be whimsically charming and a perfect match for Hanks. Its sweetness is unadulterated by awkwardness, unlikeable characters or cliche, as the majority of romance flicks are. All but guaranteed to reach the most hidden soft spot in almost everybody, and with enough clever wittiness for the rest.


Splash is the greatest romantic comedy of all time. Perhaps it even started the entire genre!

I thought the story was excellent and John Candy was awsome (too bad he died). Tom Hanks was fine and the girl was ok (anyone could have done here part but it was ok. no biggie).

I did think that this script should have been given to a better director which I thought did a mediocre job. Ron Howard -puke! did you see The Grinch -OH! How Awfully boring!! I would like to see A Beautiful Mind but I found out he did it and so therefore it will probably stink.

Anyhow, this plays out like a fairy tale and one to remember, a keeper to buy on videotape and play for the kids or yourself.

Even though I thought it should have been way way way better, I will give it a 10/10.


An atrociously made, acted and dubbed cannibal movie that is also very tame in terms of violence (except for a scene where a crocodile is skinned alive) and nudity (it must have been on the female lead's contract not to have a single nude scene). The "highlights" of the film's stupidity include:

A: The poorly integrated stock footage of animals killing each other.

B: The lamest attempted-rape sequence you'll ever see.

C: A scene of the cannibals having circled around the hero and then attacking him one-at-a-time, and him defending himself with karate moves!

D: A silly conversation about whether the cannibals have any chances of "adapting to our civilization" ("Well, it's gonna take quite some time"!).

E: The already-mentioned axe-boomerang scene, and a terribly edited spear-throwing scene a few seconds earlier.

The on-location filming is the only thing that forces me to give this film one star, instead of none. Only for the desperately curious.


I obtained this on the VideoAsia "Tales of Voodoo 2" label. No voodoo to be seen, although the eponymous natives were reasonably uncivilised.

What do you get from your average cannibal movie and how does it match up?

Well I would venture to list and suggest the following:

Soggy jungle scenes: present; Offensive animal cruelty: present; Woeful acting: present++; Poor camera-work: present+++ Nudity: not a jot; Gore: present; Plot: the usual.

Lawd! This film is desperate. A downmarket Cannibal Holocaust meets Cannibal God. The Indonesians haven't a clue. Watch something else....


This is one of those rare movies that the director should have given the celluloid away instead of wasting it on this film, and the world would be a better place because of it. I came in thinking that this was probably going to be the worst movie I had ever seen, and, to my dismay, I was right. Some bad movies, in spite of themselves, actually entertain to a certain extent, and others, like Primitif, make you wonder why you wasted five seconds of your life watching it, let alone the entire 90 minute running time. While watching this movie, I was amazed at how poor every aspect was. The acting, dubbing, and dialogue were all horrible, the camera-work was inept, and the picture quality looked like they shot it in 8MM. The only thing that might have it save face are the extremely limited scenes of action and gore, and the genuine Indonesian rain forest where they filmed. Other than that, it's the usual bad adventure movie with bad actors and prolonged sequences of characters walking through the jungle doing nothing (Jess Franco, anyone?). Ever ready to take advantage of the Italian cannibal craze, Indonesia's lone shot at the genre is a swing and a miss.

The whole ordeal opens with meeting our hapless "heros," Tommy, Bobby, and Rita. They want to research primitive tribes, but the one tribe their guide takes them to isn't primitive enough (pff), so they pay him to go deeper in the jungle. They then proceed to get into a raft accident. Rita and Tommy are lost in the woods with another one of their idiot guides, and their "good" guide and Tommy meet up later. Rita and Bobby's guide is killed in the usual bad spike trap, and they're then captured by the same cannibal tribe they were looking for and face various "tortures," including the most pathetic attempted rape ever committed to film (although there was one noteworthy scene of a cannibal gets his testicles smashed with a mallet). Cut to following Tommy, who is as pathetic as he looks. He eats hallucinatory apples and watches a cannibal give birth and follows her to the tribe. Rita and Bobby escape by being quiet and tip-toeing out of the village, and then find Tommy. They escape, and are confronted again by the cannibals. Robert fights them off single-handedly with lame kung-foo while the other two high-tale it out of there. Poor Tommy is killed, and I cried at that part not because it was so sad, but it was the most unrealistic and sappiest moment in movie history. The other two make it out on a raft with his body, and escape because the river's the cannibals' territory boundary.

All the characteristics of a bad adventure movie are present, but instead of being an entertaining bad movie (so bad it's good), it's just flat out boring. From the opening, any horror enthusiast will know the outcome from the get go, and as minorities and non-central characters die off, you realize that you were right. Almost every scene in this movie is taken from Last Cannibal World, but they copy them poorly. The biggest problems are probably the most laughable displays and scenes shown throughout the movie. Such displays include rubber snakes attacks, pointless animal combat scenes (only put in to add a cannibal genre legitimacy to it), poor special effects, and the most ridiculous turn of events, such as sawing through the cage with a rock and tip-toeing around the entire tribe to escape. Horrible! All of this helps add to the bland movie atmosphere, and it's not helped by the Flintstones-like music playing all the while. The most annoying thing though was the cannibal tribe. Every cannibal in the tribe all chant the same noise constantly (as if making that noise and bouncing is a ritual). Miraculously, though they all say the same thing all the time, they all understand each other. After watching ten minutes where the only thing on the soundtrack is that chanting and the screechy, whiny screams of the "victims" gets old really fast. The wardrobe and makeup was terrible, and the only gore effects that are good are the real animal killings (horribly out of line, with an orangutan having its head broken open), which are only there to make the movie seem as hardcore as the Italians' movies. To add to that, the infamous tomahawk-boomerang scene has to be the most hilariously stupid scene in movie history.

The only thing I can note about Primitif is that the cannibal tribe at the very least looked realistic, dirty, and gritty, unlike several other cannibal obscurities. However, everything else in the picture tears that positive note apart. Why anyone would pool their money to make this is beyond me. The acting would come better from a kindergarten music class, which doesn't help the ridiculous events, and the audio and visual elements are scratchy and inept. Yes, controversial animal killings are present, mainly to add shock to an incredibly shockless film, thinly disguised as rituals by the tribe. If there are any "good" parts to the movie, it was probably taken from other movies. Even cannibal completionists would be hard pressed to consider wasting the money for this movie, especially that there is almost no single feature release still in existence. If you can sit through it, even though I don't even recommend putting it in the player, feel free to experience the most boring 90 minutes or so of your life, and hate yourself for never being able to have them back.


Playing like a low rent version of an Italian cannibal movie, but with little nudity, some gore and bad fright wigs this is the story of a group of students who travel deep into the jungle to get material for their thesis. Stopping first with a tribe that has had contact with the modern world, they then move on to find an undiscovered group. While traveling down stream their boasts flip in the rapids and they are separated into groups. One group is captured by an unknown tribe while the others try to find them and stay alive.

This is half a good film. Most of the stuff up until they meet the unknown tribe is okay in a low rent sort of way. Once they meet the tribe things get very silly as everyone seems to be wearing the same bad wig and carrying professionally made by the prop department stone weapons. The tribe often seems to be engaging in too much "ooga booga" behavior. There are flashes of good stuff in these scenes but mostly it comes off as a gory Caveman (The movie with Ringo Starr).

The film seems to want to be on par with the Italian cannibal films but its done on the cheap and with no conviction like the films they are seeking to copy. There is almost zero nudity which is odd for a primitive culture. They strip one guy down to his bvds and then stop as if for modesty reasons. The female lead never loses her shirt even though everyone else ends up with torn clothes. The violence against animals is quite graphic (and some of the animal against animal stuff is from another mismatched film), but some of the violence against people is shown slightly obscured manner. Its a great disappointment.

This isn't to say the movie is awful. Its not. There are some good things here, basically anything not involving the natives (which I know defeats the purpose since this is film about them). This is going to appeal more to people with a love for or high tolerance of bad movies since a good half of this is very silly.


When I first found this film at my local video store I thought it must have been a retitled version of one of the Lenzi or Deodato cannibal films as I had never heard of it before. After watching it I wish it had been.

There is something almost authentic about the Italian cannibal films, where as this comes across as exactly what it is, a cheapo jungle adventure. The natives in this one ham it up way to much in my opinion.

I have mentioned cannibals a few times already, but there is no actual cannibalism in this film(people are speared and taken by crocodiles), although it is mentioned by some characters in the film, it is however in the same vein as the Italian cannibal films. There is of course plenty of violence against animals and some hilariously badly inserted stock footage(very grainy) of a leopard attacking or being attacked by crocodiles and a snake killing a furry critter of some sort.

Some scenes are OK, such as the scenes set inside a cave, where two of the central characters are held captive, being urinated on while trapped in a cage and being forced on to all fours and ridden around like a horse, but in the main it is badly acted and pretty boring.

The version that I saw looked like it was cut, although I would not think that an uncut version would be all that gory anyway as there doesn't seem to be that much opportunity for extreme violence with the situations that are created.

Only seek this one out if you have to see every cannibal(?) movie ever made.


I can't say that Primitif is the worst film in the cannibal genre, because White Cannibal Queen takes the cake, but I can say that it is following the same path. Primitif may be one of the most ridiculous and dull films I have ever seen. This film goes past the "So bad its good" factor, and dives strait into a pile of crap. What makes it even worse it that he creator of this films couldn't even think of original ideas for it. Scenes form such films as Jungle Holocaust and Mountain of the Cannibal God are re-enacted and placed into the heap.

We fallow a group of characters that look like they were just pulled out of a Scooby-Doo movie and placed in the jungle. They are doing a study of primitive tribes, and hire guide to take them deep into the jungle. They soon come across and tribe, but find them to "not be primitive enough" and pay their guide to take them deeper into the jungle. They soon are traveling down river, and as you can guess, they crash into some rocks and separate.

They are eventually captured by some of the "real natives" that they were looking for and are "abused and tortured" in acts that look like a tropical island party, with having them crawl under peoples lags, and playing piggy back with the native children.

As was mentioned before, several scenes in this film were just re-enactments of scenes from previous cannibal films. One seen that I found extremely ridiculous was that they re-enacted the rape scene is Mountain of the Cannibal God, but the actress in the film refused to do a nude scene so she is just humped for a few min with her clothes on.

This film tried desperately to be one of the next jungle gore feasts, but just turned into a heaping pile of boredom. I do not suggest this film unless you are a hardcore cannibal fan, or collector of rare films.


Rugged Robert (hunky Barry Prima), snippy Rita (homely eyesore Enny Haryono), and nerdy Tommy (bespectacled beanpole dweeb Johann Mardjono) are a trio of eager young college students who along with their macho guide Bisma (chunky bearded wonder Rukman Herman) find themselves in deep trouble when they encounter a lethal tribe of primitive cannibals deep in the jungle. Man, does this extremely cheap and crummy clunker strike out something rotten in every conceivable department: Sisworo Guatama Putra's flat, fumbling (mis)direction, the poky pace, Imam Tantowi's by-the-numbers hackneyed and predictable cookie cutter script, the slipshod editing, the bland acting, Lee Fioole's sub-par cinematography, the dreadful dubbing, precious little nudity, several poorly staged action scenes (in one especially unimpressive scene a native feebly wrestles with a python), the mild gore, Gatot Sudarto's mostly insipid, only sporadically lively score, a pitifully dumb and nonexplicit attempted rape that's followed by an equally lousy off-screen castration, and the colorless, unappealing main characters (Rita in particular is insufferably whiny) all leave a great deal to be desired. The fact that the DVD source print is clearly taken a beat-up VHS tape complete with drop-outs and occasional faulty tracking doesn't help matters in the least. This stinker quite simply lacks the essential sleaze and vigor that it needs in order to qualify as an entertaining piece of trash. Only the beautiful jungle scenery and the inspired use of Kraftwork's insanely funky "We Are the Robots" as the opening credits theme song offer some relief from the overall stupefying tedium. A dismally dull and dissatisfying dud.


I watched this movie under the title "Primitif" with Holland subtitles. It was not interesting at all, the plot (if any) was obvious and the gore effects was not very good. Need I say that the acting was ham? The only positive thing is the intro soundtrack which was "We are the robots" by Kraftwerk, accompanied by some "stylish" jungle-footage. Bah!

Unless you're a REAL jungle-exploitation/cannibal-movie fan, this is not worth the 90 minutes.


The concentration camp survivors interviewed in this documentary broke my heart... hearing the man who saw his best friend eaten by German Shepards... and the gay man who courageously freed his Jewish lover, only to see his lover act even more courageously by choosing to return to his sick family, to die together with them. These stories are real, they are devastating, and they MUST be seen by everyone.


This film is fantastic. What a powerful 80 minutes of film. It was so informative and emotional without shoving anything down your throat. The way the delicate and sensitive subject matters were handled was graceful and respectful. Kudos.

It made me feel angry, sad, and compassion for the people that are struggling to voice their stories without making a fiasco out of what happened to them.

Like so many other documentaries, this one did not try and play with my emotion with overly sappy music or editing. It was simple and precise. The music was haunting and had the perfect mood for the piece. The interviews were not overly edited for dramatic effect, but were simple and honest.

I watched it twice. Cried both times. And I feel more educated and compassionate for renting this great film.


I was a bit put off by some of the negative comments, but it is always interesting to then view a film which is praised by some and despised by one or two. As is often the case, the negative views turn out to be more a reflection of personality rather than of serious critical scholarship.

Putting together this film was hardly a snap. There are only a handful of survivors still alive and living in central Europe, and some refused to appear in the film. I think the film-makers were very successful in capturing the essence of the homosexual experience during the Nazi times and beyond, as reflected in the footage they obtained from the six or seven survivors who were willing to share their stories on camera.

We really don't need any more "education" on Nazi legal machinations or conditions in concentration camps. We ARE interested in the experiences and emotions of these particular people, to see them and hear them, before they are swallowed by the inexorable march of time. The film performs this invaluable service and does it well.

The interviews are interspersed with a general historical summary of events and their effect on the gay community in Germany during the years between the two great wars, and later on. Yes, these parts may resemble a special on the History Channel. Nothing wrong with that!

All in all, a very professional job and a solid achievement.


I have seen the movie yesterday and was quite moved by it. I did not expect much (because usually I am not the documentary type), but the mixture of old film footage and photos (with some 20s and 30s music) and interviews of a few of the survivors (7 homosexualls, 1 lesbian) was very interesting. The big thing about this movie is to get to know about what happened in that time, because no one spoke about this when we were talking about the second world war in history class. it is unbelievable that the paragraph 175 existed even till 1969. this is a must-see film !


Paragraph 175 is a powerful documentary that deals with a provocative subject. I just wish filmmakers Jeffrey Friedman and Rob Epstein had fleshed out the subject a bit more. While this film about gay men who were persecuted and imprisoned under the Nazi regime, is in many respects absorbing, the film ultimately suffers from an overly narrow and constricted focus.

Perhaps the problem was that there were just not enough men alive today who were willing to talk about their experiences. From the outset, the pool of interviewees was certainly going to be limited, but also limited is the actual archival footage of life in the concentration camps.

Instead the directors have chosen to pepper the film with well-preserved family photographs, and lively footage of gay and lesbian culture blossoming during the days of the Weimar Republic after WW1. Sensitively narrated by British actor Rupert Everett, Paragraph 175 is all about the German penal code, which was originally enacted in 1871, and later used by the Nazis, to outlaw homosexuality.

The penal code stated: "An unnatural sex act committed between persons of male sex is punishable by imprisonment; the loss of civil rights may also be imposed," But Paragraph 175 was never really enforced until the Nazi's came to power. This documentary centers on six emotional accounts of the most elderly and frail survivors of the concentration camps who, up until now, have repressed their stories.

There's a Jewish gay resistance fighter who posed as a Hitler Youth member to rescue his lover from a Gestapo transfer camp in an ultimately futile effort; a photographer who was arrested and imprisoned for homosexuality, who upon his release joined the army because of the lack of men in his hometown and he "wanted to be with men." There's a young man who was freed from a sentence at Dachau only to be interned again at Buchenwald, and a Frenchman imprisoned from Alsace, who breaks down after telling of being raped and subject to inhuman torture. Their stories are indeed heart wrenching, because unlike the Jews, they have forced to live quietly, unable to share their horrific experiences for so long.

It is interesting to note that the penal code didn't cover lesbians. The Nazis considered lesbians to be "curable." Women were regarded, as vessels of motherhood - increasing the German population was top priority - therefore, they were exempt from mass arrest. Most lesbians went into exile or quietly married gay men. One woman, who tells her story in the film, was given exit papers and was lucky enough to escape to England.

The statistics are staggering: Between 1933 and 1945, some 100,000 men were arrested for homosexuality, roughly half of them were sentenced to prison, and from 10,000 to 15,000 were sent to concentration camps. The camps were used for re-education, slave labor, castration and sadistic medical experiments. It's believed only about 4,000 survived their ordeal.

The situation didn't improve after the war. Paragraph 175 remained in force until the late sixties, so many gay men were re-imprisoned and subject to repeated persecution. In this respect, Epstein and Friedman should be largely commended for bringing this subject to the attention of the world, and telling these powerful personal stories before the last survivors die. Mike Leonard September 05


The golden days of decadent Berlin came to a bloody halt when Hitler's regime took over Germany in the early 1930s and gay men were brought down by simple innuendo and gossip (lesbianism was considered curable, but male homosexuality was "catching"). Early talk of homosexuality in Hitler's ranks precipitated the reinsertion of Paragraph 175, an old anti-sodomy law from the late 1800s, and gays were branded with the lowly Pink Triangle. Forceful documentary on a little talked-about chapter of history has just a handful of elderly witnesses but a superlative presentation of personally-shot footage mixed with telling photographs. Some of the recollections are haunting; the doomed come back to life in these harrowing stories. *** from ****


I agree that this is an excellent film. One has to admire the willingness of these men to tell their story after so many years. Paragraph 175 remained as a law in the German Penal Code until the 1970s, which is why the gay survivors were not given the same reparations that other survivors received. I saw this film on cable and am planning to get a copy on DVD. However, a previous comment incorrectly stated that this was the first film on this subject in 67 years. There was an earlier film which interviewed gay male Holocaust survivors. The title is "We Were Marked With a Big Red A." I do not see it listed in IMDb, but I have it on VHS. I purchased it in the bookshop at the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington. I think that Klaus Müller, who is a consultant to the Holocaust Museum, was also on the crew of this film.


PARAGRAPH 175, which premiered in the US (outside of Sundance) last night at the Miami Gay and Lesbian Film Festival, is must-see viewing. When one thinks how many documentaries have been made about the Nazi oppression of Jews, Roma (formerly known as Gypsies), and other groups, it is almost inconceivable that it is only in the year 2000, 67 years after the Nazi persecution of male homosexuals started (in 1933), that a documentary on the subject is finally released. It was high time this happened. This documentary about the terrible fate of this population group aims to inform the general public, and does so well. It is aided by the excellent commentary voiced by openly gay actor and part-time Miami resident Rupert Everett. If it is shown anyplace near you, see it. It might be the only opportunity to do so, unless it is later distributed in video or DVD.


This film is an excellent example of letting people tell their story without embellishing the contextual situation. The extra material added to the interviews is perfectly balanced to put the interviews in their historical and personal context, without unduly expanding the context to overshadow what the (very few) survivors had to tell. Enough information is given about paragraph 175 and it's application during Hitler's reign and after for us to get an insight of its consequences, and the situation of denial of our 'civilised' western countries even today regarding the gay victims of this horror. But the focus is on the survivors' tale, not the context. This technique (too rarely applied) produced an extremely powerful documentary. I have seldom seen such a well balanced work.


If you are gay, lesbian, or simply sympathetic to the lives and struggles of gays and lesbians, you must watch this film.

It is the story of gays and although briefly, lesbians, during the early Pre-WWII years and also during the war.

Although I had heard of the "pink triangle" used by the Nazi's during the war, I had never heard any information about victims of Nazi persecution against homosexuals. Ever. Until now I was in the dark.

I shall forever be grateful to the producers, director, and survivors who shared their deeply personal stories, each unique, yet all with a common thread; one of having survived as homosexuals and lesbians during the Nazi era in Germany.

The stories are real, the people are real, and the emotions which are displayed and which will be brought forth in you, are real. It is impossible to be a human being, and not be struck deep inside by the faces and stories of these people.

Remarkably, even some of the survivors eventually became members of the German Army during the war themselves, so in no means is this a whitewashed film nor is it seen only through rose colored glasses.

This is documentary cinema at its very finest. Emotional, insightful, raw, and human in every sense of the word.

Do not miss this film!


Although there have been other homosexual films involving this issue, they had them broken down and rebuilt to fit a film. This one is different in that it presents the thing as a whole. The story-telling is direct, yet it's different from the heaviness and cruelty of "Night & Fog". Instead of focusing on the holocaust, this one is humanity-oriented. It's touching, but it's no less strong when I dwelled on the contrasts.

All the interviewees of as old as around ninety are survivors from the concentration camp during WWII. Each old man or woman who went through all the twisted time has a heartbreakingly romantic memory to tell. Some were indifferent. Some were tearful. Some were furious. It was incredibly amazing that even after all those years they managed to keep the subtlest details of the forbidden love and the dark holocaust.

Since the first time I laid my eyes on the cover of Penguin version's "Maurice", I grew obsessed with those nostalgic black & white and autochrome photographs, which this documentary contains a lot. When the inadequacy of photographic technology left us these photos of brotherly love, it's even more bittersweetly touching. Each weather-beaten photo has a iridescent moment behind it. The everlasting intimacy and beauty in these photos already suggested love is universal.

Their lives go on. They may not last long. They may just bury the memories, but they shouldn't regret --- judging from their facial expression while they were recalling their love at first sights and my imagination of a certain hilarious party in a certain club on a certain street in the night of the 1920's Berlin of chaos and liberation.

They are unique. They were, are and shall be envied by all, for which they've paid their price. How could they not be proud of themselves and at the same time torturous? As for all those who deny the history, they lost the last piece of emotion. And I'm sorry, if not furious anymore, for that.

I'm grateful to these film makers for attending to this precious, lost part of human history. I'm grateful that we're told. We're told to be open-minded and, if possible, to feel humanity.


While I think that everyone should see this film because of its vitally important subject matter, I feel that because of lax editing and meandering, incomplete story telling, it was much less effective than it should have been.

As just one example, and I have been studying Nazi persecution of homosexuals, the movie briefly refers to a gay man's friend who was killed by German Shepherd dogs in front of 300 people. I read a similar account on the Internet (I suspect it was the same case), in which graphic details were given of the brutality of the crime, details which, if you heard or read about, you would never forget. To just gloss over this compelling tale in the manner the movie does is inexcusable. How can one understand the true horror when it is glossed over.

Additionally, one of the major points of this film should be how many gay concentration camp victims were still treated as prisoners after the war, specifically because of Paragraph 175. It is barely a footnote in the movie. This is inexplicable to me.

What is good is having a record of living survivors of gay detention during the Holocaust. It remains the reason for seeing this movie. But the narrative is very meandering and a few of the lingering close-ups of some of the survivors breaking down almost feels exploitative.

Bottom line: because of the important subject matter and the live interviews the film needs to be seen. I just wish it had been made more coherently. A film with this type of material will always be powerful. It could have been far more so had it been made by better filmmakers.