Gunasekera’s ”case or controversy” lies within his liberty interest in his reputation as an employed faculty member of a state supported institution of higher education [assumption] which is protected by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Since the institution took ”action” against him, the full rudimentary demands of fair play under due process required notice and opportunity to be heard before his liberty interests in his employment could be affected absent some exigent circumstances which would otherwise allow a temporary suspension. I would note that if the university is a private institution; then due process is not required. Only some procedure required between the employee and employer or a collective bargaining agreement. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/business-law-test-1-scenarios-and-case-problems/