For the areas where the manual indicates videos are a requirement, they are in fact a requirement. No alternative has ever been identified to replace the videos. In terms of demonstrating competence, a video is the default format for definitely providing a sample of one’s work.   The senior option only provides the option to provide writing samples in lieu of the video if relevant writing samples are available (articles, etc.). If a senior option eligible candidate wants to focus on a psychotherapy case, for example, or does not have the relevant writing samples, they would need to submit a video.   That being said, the manual specifies that videos are only required for the areas of psychotherapy, supervision, and career. Videos are only preferred for administration, training, and consultation. So if a video is ultimately not possible due to work setting, the latter three might be the best options. If a candidate can obtain a video it would be ideal, but given some circumstances it is acceptable if there is not a video for the preferred areas.   In many work settings one has to serve many roles: therapist, consultant, supervisor, etc. Many candidates also serve in administrative roles, supervising programs. So they can potentially submit a sample in an alternative area as needed. Candidates should confer with the Practice Sample Chair to discuss.