Graphology is considered as a pseudoscience. No scientific evidence exists to support graphology. One way it has been tested is by having multiple graphologists analyse the same handwriting sample. When this was done, the graphologists all provided different personality traits, which were all correct, proving there wasn’t a universal accurate way to analyse handwriting. While a pseudo-science is set up to look for evidence that supports its claims, a science is set up to challenge its claims and look for evidence that might prove it false. In other words, pseudo-science seeks confirmations and science seeks falsifications. Hence graphology is considered as a pseudoscience.