Determining which risks to discuss within the consent process should be based on the severity of the potential harm, the likelihood of occurrence, and the relevance to the patient. Obviously, even a small chance of death or serious disability is significant. The type and the number of risks to be disclosed should also depend on the significance each patient would attach to such risks in deciding whether to consent to the procedure or treatment. For instance, a remote risk of hearing loss associated with an antibiotic treatment is of major significance to a musician. Alternative treatments, including the risk of no treatment, should always be discussed. Explanations should be tailored to the individual patient's competency, comprehension, need, and desire for detail.