The practice of putting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the examination of others who are specialists in the same field has been termed as peer review. The primary benefit of a peer review process is that peer-reviewed publications are a reliable form of scholarly communication. They are a necessary component for authors to gain recognition for their work and attract funding for further research. Peer review can be done in many ways. One way is to seek out reviews of your work from other scholars in the field. You can do this by contacting researchers who have published on related topics and asking them if they would be willing to provide feedback on your manuscript. Other methods include posting calls for papers, holding workshops/conferences, and searching academic databases for relevant articles. Peer review is important because it allows researchers to check whether their work has been interpreted correctly by those working in the field. It also helps to identify any errors in methodology or presentation of data. Finally, it provides an opportunity for authors to get feedback on their work so that they can improve it for future submissions. Peer review was originally developed by John Locke in 1668 as a means of improving scientific publishing. He proposed that manuscripts should be reviewed by peers (i.e., other scientists) before they were accepted for publication. This system has since been adopted by many journals across the world.