Yes, once a potentially problematic situation has arisen, the user has the option of retaining the information needed to ascertain as far as possible what has just happened, and to use it as evidence if necessary.
Please note that this information can be used by law enforcement agencies or the justice system to a certain extent.
If this information can shed light on the commission of a criminal offence (violence, insults, assault, harassment, etc.), several court rulings have recognized the admissibility of such evidence, even when the perpetrator has not given his or her consent to be recorded. Violation of privacy cannot be invoked in this case, as the overriding interest is to provide proof of the commission of an offence.
On the other hand, if this information is used to establish a civil/commercial situation (acknowledgement of a debt, negotiation or disagreement over a contract, an event that does not fall within the scope of criminal law…), the information will only be admissible as prima facie evidence, i.e. as a clue.) the information will only be admissible as prima facie evidence, i.e. as a clue, and on condition that the judge agrees to consider its regularity, i.e. in particular when the fairness of the recording is not contested, which could be the case if it has been made without a person’s knowledge.
As far as possible, we must always guard against any violation of privacy or use of personal data without the consent of an interested party.
For this reason, users should use this application with discretion and, where possible, indicate that they are using the application.