Traditional methods of software security testing, like static analysis (SAST) and dynamic black-box testing (DAST), suffer from significant limitations. Starting with SAST, it lacks runtime context, meaning it cannot fully assess the actual behavior of the software during execution. Consequently, SAST often generates numerous false positives, leading to potential vulnerabilities being overlooked or ignored. On the other hand, DAST faces its own set of challenges. While it evaluates the external behavior of a software application, it fails to assess its internal workings, leaving potential security flaws within the code undetected. Furthermore, DAST does not achieve complete code coverage, meaning certain parts of the application might remain untested and susceptible to vulnerabilities.