The probative value of these kinds of evidence largely depends on the facts of the case. In other words, there is no hard and fast rule that says direct evidence always has a greater weight than indirect evidence, or vice versa. While some may believe that direct evidence is more impactful, others comment that circumstantial evidence can be even more reliable. Consider, for example, a witness testifying that he saw an accused commit the crime. This is unreliable testimony if a criminal defense attorney shows that the witness has a bad memory. Also, recall that indirect evidence often includes things like forensic evidence and fingerprints. Many jurors believe these types of evidence more objectively show guilt when compared to a witness’s interpretation of events.