Here’s a comparison between Flow and Ethereum as platforms for developing NFTs: Flow vs. Ethereum: Throughput Flow operates on a proof-of-stake network, which translates to lower transaction fees. In contrast, Ethereum contends with high gas fees due to network congestion. Flow's efficient development allows faster transaction processing, while Ethereum transactions can be costlier and more time-consuming. Flow can process up to 1,000 transactions per second (TPS), a significant advantage over Ethereum's average TPS of about 15. The PoS consensus algorithm employed by Flow also positions it as an energy-efficient platform for deploying NFT projects.Scalability Flow distinguishes itself by employing a multi-node architecture, contrasting Ethereum's sharding approach for scalability. This multi-node structure empowers projects with greater throughput and scalability, all without compromising security and speed.Beta Mode on Mainnet for Smart Contract Development Flow allows developers to release smart contracts in beta mode on its mainnet. This feature lets developers iron out any code-related issues before the full contract release. Subsequently, developers can launch these optimized smart contracts on the Flow blockchain, ensuring an enhanced user experience.