8.1. The warranty period for the delivered Performance is 24 (twenty-four) months from the day that the risk of damage to a thing passes from KIN to the Client, unless otherwise agreed in the Contract. 8.2. The warranty is given on condition that all due obligations of the Client towards KIN are paid. Should the Client be late with thepayment of any of its due obligations towards KIN when filing a complaint about a defect of the Performance, KIN shall be entitled to interrupt the complaint process for the period the Client is delayed with the fulfilment of its obligations towards KIN, but without any interruption or extension of the warranty period. 8.3. KIN is only liable for products of other suppliers used for the manufacture of the Performance or delivered with the Performance to the extent to which its subcontractor is liable for them. KIN is entitled to handle complaints regarding such products by assigning the claims against the subcontractor to the Client. 8.4. KIN is not liable for minor or small defects that do not affect the function or use of the Performance delivered by the Client, orif they were caused by Client’s unqualified activity, by a third party or event of force majeure, or if they occurred as a consequence of inadequate stress, non-observance of the provided operational instructions, improper maintenance, freezing, corrosion, chemical, electrical or electrolytic impacts. The Performance shall be regarded as free of defects if it can be processed for the purposes for which it was manufactured, in this case the Client is not entitled to file any claims under liability for defects or warranty with respect to such Performance to KIN. Any claims due to defective Performance or under warranty shall expire if the Performance is damaged, processed or otherwise transformed by fault of the Client. Any rights under the warranty or liability for defects arise solely to the Client, who is not entitled to assign these rights to a third party without the prior written consent of KIN. 8.5. If more units of the Performance than one are delivered, the acceptance inspection by comparison as per ISO 2859 and ISO 2859-1 and the Acceptable Quality Limit (AQL), determined by these standards, shall be used (hereinafter referred to as the “Standardised Inspection”). The Standardised Inspection is always carried out in relation to one delivery of the Performance, delivered on the basis of one delivery note or CMR form. Therefore, to determine the initial scope of the delivery (Table 1 forCSN ISO 2859-1), the quantity of the Performance specified in the delivery note or CMR form shall be used. 8.6. Unless otherwiseagreed in the Contract, the following parameters are to be used for the Standardised Inspection: standard inspection, inspection level: II quantity check according to ISO 2859 AQL level: 0.1 or 0.65, depending on defect severity according to the list ofdefects 8.7. List of defects: Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       AV –Aerosol Valves       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x         Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       BOV       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x         Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       APPLICATORS and ADAPTERS       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x         Incomplete productx          Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       ATOMISERS       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x         Incomplete productx          Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       SC Spraycaps       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x         Incomplete productx          Description of defectAQL 0.25AQL 0.65AQL 1.5Note –defect samples       CAPS       Functional defectx          Optical (visual) non-functional defect (defect with no negative impact on the function)  x        Deformation, non-functional defect x         Contamination  x        Damaged package x         Presence of other products, components x     8.8. If the acceptance inspectionby comparison is performed according to ISO 2859 and ISO 2859-1 (see above) and the number of non-conforming units does not exceed the permitted limits (Acceptable Quality Limit –AQL), it is understood that the Performance is free of defects, and a complaint cannot be submitted. Based on the results of the Standardised inspection, only the performance that has been subjected to the Standardised Inspection may be claimed, i.e., the Performance specified in the particular delivery note.   8.9. The Client is obliged to inspect or carry out the Standardised Inspection immediately after the acceptance with due professional care, and immediately after the delivery of the performance, submit written claims pointing out any defects that have been identified by suchinspection or by the Standardised Inspection. If the Client does not file a written complaint about defects that may be discovered by the acceptance check or Standardised Inspection within 5 days from acceptance of the Performance, it is understood that the Client is liable for the occurrence of the defect unless the Client demonstrates that KIN is liable for the defect. The Client is obligated to claim other defects in writing at KIN without undue delay after having been able to identify them by exercising adequate professional care and due diligence, but no later than by the end of the warranty period. The existence of defects or claimed defects shall not entitle the Client to terminate the Contract, to suspend payments, or terminate fulfilment of any other obligations under the Contract.   8.10. In the complaint the Client must always describe how the defects manifest themselves and specify the Client’s requirements for the settlement of the complaint, and attach the Performance identification data (LTE ID) including suitable means of proof (mainly the results of the Standardised Inspection, photographs, samples and possibly other information based on KIN’s request). Any complaint made that does not comply with these conditions or the Contract shall be treated as not filed. KIN is entitled to check the defects complained about on site through its representative, in the presence of the Client, and a report shall always be made on the results of such a check. At the request of KIN, the Client is obliged, in the presence of KIN representatives, to repeat the Standardised Inspection at the Client’s plant in order to demonstrate that the performance is defective. KIN reserves the right to carry out the Standardised Inspection of the Performance with due care at KIN’s factory with the participation of the Client. Should there be a conflict between the results of the Standardised Inspection performed by the Client and the Standardised Inspection performed by KIN, the results of the Standardised Inspection performed by KIN shall be binding on the parties. The cost for transportation of the claimed Performance to the KIN plant and back due to the performance of the Standardised Inspection at KIN shall be borne by the Client, providing that the claim was unjustified.   8.11. If a complaint is justified and admitted by KIN in writing, the parties shall agree the adequate method of handling thereof. Unless the parties otherwise agree, KIN shall, at its option, either eliminate the defect by delivery of the Performance free of defects, or grant a price discount. KIN shall notify the Client of the method of handling the complaint after the complaint is assessed. By removing a defect or giving a discount, the complaint shall be regarded as fully settled and the Client shall not be entitled toexercise any additional steps. At the same time the Parties agree expressly that provisions of Sections 1923, 1924, 2615 and 2106 through 2110 of the CC shall not apply.   8.12. If the price has already been paid, KIN undertakes to refund the price discount to the Client within 1 (one) month from the date that the agreement regarding the complaint settlement is made. In this case the Client is not entitled to claim default interest. Should the price not be paid in full at the time the agreement on the claim settlement is concluded, the Client is not entitled to unilaterally include or set off the receivable, representing the price discount of Performance, against the receivable of KIN to receive payment for the price of Performance.   8.13. In the event that the Client’s claim is unjustified, the Client is obliged to reimburse KIN for all costs incurred in dealing with the claim. The relevant cost shall be determined by KIN pursuant to Annex No. 1 of this document or based on the actual costs acquired by KIN.