There's a variety of articles that share one common misconception: Recruiters hate and distrust functional resumes. However, that opinion is normally gathered by surveyors after questioning a small sample of recruiters. The truth is that it’s a matter of opinion — some recruiters might dismiss your functional resumes, others may like it.
But, it is true that functional resumes are less likely to be positively reviewed by recruiters than chronological or functional resumes for the following reasons.
1.
Applicant tracking systems: Also known as ATS, these programs are commonly used by companies to scan and approve resumes with matching qualifications before forwarding the documents to hiring managers. These programs can eliminate as many as half the candidates before the first pass, and look for specific resume sections following specific formats. Since the functional resume has unique sections and layouts, it’s less likely to successfully pass an ATS. We recommend using this resume if you’re applying as a referral candidate, or have a personal connection within the company.
2.
Lack of timelines: Most recruiters do scan resumes for your work history and, more importantly, loyalty to former jobs. Many recruiters prefer candidates with long periods of time at their former jobs, as it indicates loyalty and long-term commitment. Since the functional resume downplays your work history and avoids detailed timelines, this can hurt your chances of leaving a good impression. We advise opening your resume with a summary statement that clarifies your history with short-term employment — it can help contextualize your functional resume.