The legal environment concerning arbitration clauses and class action waivers in ERISA plans is undergoing significant change Recent court rulings, such as Cedeno v. Sasson, have raised concerns about the enforceability of arbitration provisions that restrict plan participants' ability to pursue broad, plan-wide remedies. This case, among others, highlights a growing judicial caution against overly restrictive arbitration terms in benefit plans. As a result, healthcare providers should carefully review and, if necessary, revise their ERISA plan documents to ensure that arbitration clauses are clear, enforceable, and compliant with current legal standards. While arbitration can still be a valuable tool for resolving disputes, these provisions must be thoughtfully crafted to align with the latest legal developments and avoid limiting participants' rights unduly.