Yes. We are agnostic toward the use of Carbon Capture in Enhanced Oil Recovery or not. Critics assert that the emissions associated with the combustion of the oil extracted using EOR diminishes the impact of the CO2 sequestration activity.  While there are CO2 emissions related to oil production and combustion, the amount of CO2 injected per barrel of oil recovered is greater than the emissions associated with that barrel of oil. This raises the prospect of carbon negative oil. Furthermore, the criticism ignores the fact that CO2 has value for the Carbon Capture operator. As oil is recovered and some of the injected CO2 re-emerges, they will continue capturing that CO2 and sequestering it until the oil stops flowing, ensuring the permanent subterranean storage of carbon dioxide. CO2-EOR is also a market mechanism that can assist in the scaling up of CCUS, which is critical if we are to meet our Paris Accord targets. Carbon Capture facilities are expensive, and if the recovery of more oil from a well can assist in defraying some of that upfront CapEx, the deployment of CCUS will be able to scale faster. CarbonKerma is interested in a pragmatic approach to our global decarbonization goals and good solutions can often appear counterintuitive on the surface. If Enhanced Oil Recovery can help us achieve our Paris Accord targets, it, in fact, becomes a net positive endeavor.