To tackle this question, the Coalition (with the help of EBP US) conducted an analysis on the potential implications of an MBUF system on rural and urban households in several Eastern U.S. states in 2020. We have found that, when using a revenue neutral per-mile MBUF rate: Changes would be minimal for most households. Depending on where residents live and what type of vehicle they drive, a shift to MBUF is estimated to change household expenses by about $1.50 a month. How far vehicles can drive on a tank of fuel makes a difference. Households near urban areas tend to have more fuel-efficient vehicles than those in rural areas. This means urban households generally pay less fuel tax per mile driven than rural households in the current fuel tax funding model. If the fuel tax were replaced with a revenue neutral MBUF system, drivers in most rural areas would pay less than they do now.