The state of Nevada is an at-fault jurisdiction. In a state that uses the at-fault compensation model, the driver usually must pay for damages arising for an accident that they cause. This means that in case there is an accident, the victim can file for compensation from the firm that insures the at-fault person.
Unlike states that use the no-fault compensation model, in Nevada, the victim must prove the fault of the driver to get compensation. To prove fault, one usually must provide varying types of evidence such as witness statements, a police report, physical evidence, and other pertinent types of evidence.
The state of Nevada also has a contributory negligence law. This means that after being involved in accident and filing for a claim, your compensation can be reduced depending on the degree to which you contributed to the accident. It also means that if you were more at-fault for causing the accident compared to the party you are suing; you can be barred from collecting any compensation at all.
While pundits usually criticize the at-fault system because it requires victims who are filing for a claim to prove the fault of the defendant, the at-fault system used in Nevada has a lot of advantages. Under the at-fault system, claimants can sue for compensation for any non-economic losses they suffer in an accident. In a no-fault system, victims in an accident cannot file for compensation against the liable party for any non-economic losses they get in an accident.