He is true; with the 1966 release of Jonathan Bennett's "Kant's Analytic" and Peter Strawson's "Bounds of Sense": An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Kant's theory begins its rehabilitation in analytic philosophy. These are the first books since Hume's to attempt a serious examination of the Kantian project. They demonstrate that much of what was assumed about Kant's method and his relationship to other philosophers-especially Hume-is mistaken. They also represent a break from the traditional interpretation of Kant as a major figure on the continental tradition. The early work on the Kantian project was done by British philosophers, many of them trained in analytical methods. It is only more recently that scholars have become interested in exploring the influence of German idealism on Britain via France. The fact that these influential studies were written by Britons rather than French or German contributors should make it clear how far removed this work is from the continental tradition of interpreting Kant. Yet even among the authors mentioned above there are differences of emphasis and approach which are important to note. Jonathan Bennett focuses on the transcendental deduction in Part I of the Critique as the place where all remaining metaphysical possibilities are eliminated from consideration. He thus gives a particularly detailed reading of the first section of the argument.