Alexis Molnar: There's a lot. I find they're both great in their own respects. I have a very soft spot for theatre because it's where I started and it's where I grew up and it is what I was trained through and there is an excitement to it that I don't think you get through film acting with a live audience. There's a difference when you're film acting and you have a crew with you and there's a bunch of people with cameras even though it looks like there's only two people on screen because there's a room fill of fifty people. But there are all actively doing their job. They're not watching you and observing your performance and the nuances of your performance. So with that flexibility and the ability to also have, hopefully not unlimited number of takes, but you do have the option to do it again when you're filming versus the show must go on, you gotta do it live, this is it, you gotta do it in the moment. There is something really special and exciting about that, that is different. Whereas film acting you're focused on the nuances of your performance. People say it's a little more natural acting. But to me it's all the same personally as far as technique goes. But when I'm film acting, I'm working on my performance and not running into the camera. Whereas, on stage, I'm trying to remember my lines and remember my blocking live in front of people who are actively judging me in real-time.