The concepts introduced in the paper regarding extended credibility-limited revision can be effectively generalized to other types of belief change, such as update and non-prioritized revision, within the framework of epistemic spaces.
For instance, the principles of credibility and consistency preservation can be adapted to update mechanisms, where the focus is on incorporating new information that may alter the agent's beliefs. By employing a similar axiomatic structure, one could define update operators that respect the credibility of incoming information while allowing for the possibility of inconsistent beliefs. This would enable agents to update their beliefs in a manner that is both rational and reflective of the complexities of real-world information.
In the context of non-prioritized revision, the ideas of extended credibility-limited revision can be utilized to create operators that do not impose a strict hierarchy on beliefs. Instead, these operators could allow for a more egalitarian approach to belief change, where all incoming information is considered based on its credibility, regardless of its source or prior status. This would enhance the flexibility of belief change processes, making them more applicable to diverse scenarios where beliefs are not easily prioritized.
Overall, the integration of extended credibility-limited revision principles into other belief change frameworks can lead to more robust and adaptable systems capable of handling the intricacies of belief dynamics in epistemic spaces.