Georgia law recognizes that children are often attracted to dangerous conditions, such as unattended swimming pools or trampolines, and therefore imposes a duty on property owners to keep their premises free from hazards that might attract and injure trespassing children.Under the doctrine of attractive nuisance, a property owner can be held liable for injuries to children if the following elements are satisfied:The owner of the property knows or should reasonably know that it is likely children will trespass on the propertyThe owner knows or should reasonably know the existence of the hazard and that it is likely to cause serious injury or death to trespassing childrenThe trespassing children are not aware of the dangerous condition or, because of their youth, the children do not understand the danger presented by the hazardous conditionThe burden of fixing the hazard is minor in comparison to the to the risk of injury that it presentsThe property owner does not exercise reasonable care in removing the dangerous conditionThe attractive nuisance doctrine does not apply if the child is a guest on the owner’s property; it only applies to children who are trespassers. In general, it is easier to prove liability when the injured child is an invited guest on the property that contains the dangerous condition.