No, noseless saddles are not necessarily better. They may provide some benefits for certain types of riders, but there are also potential drawbacks to consider.
Noseless saddles have gained in popularity in recent years as an alternative to traditional bicycle seats. Some riders find them more comfortable, while others believe they can help prevent saddle-related injuries. There is no definitive answer as to whether or not noseless saddles are superior to traditional designs, as it ultimately comes down to personal preference.
There are a few advantages that noseless saddles offer over standard ones. First, they distribute weight more evenly across the rider's sit bones, which can be helpful for those with soreness or discomfort in the perineal area (between the anus and scrotum). Noseless saddles also eliminate pressure on the pudendal nerve, which runs through this region and can become irritated when compressed. In addition, many riders find that they can move around more freely on a noseless saddle, which can be beneficial if you tend to shift your position frequently while riding.
However, there are also some potential drawbacks to using a noseless saddle. One is that they often require a shorter seatpost than traditional designs, which could limit your adjustability options if you need to raise or lower your seat height for any reason. Another issue is that without a nose, most noseless saddles don't offer much in the way of aerodynamic properties - so if you're looking for a fast bike setup, this might not be the best option. Additionally, because of their unusual shape, it can be difficult to find clothing (such as cycling shorts) that fits well with a noseless saddle - so this is something else worth considering before making the switch.
Ultimately, whether or not a noseless saddle is right for you is something that only you can decide based on your own preferences and needs.