The United States Constitution allows Congress to impeach the President when a majority of the House of Representatives votes that the President has committed the crime of treason, bribery, or any other serious crimes and misdemeanors. The process is carried out in the Senate, and the trial will decide if he is deposed from the presidency. It is, however, not an indictment. It is a civil trial, and there have been several instances in which an impeached official has been found guilty of a crime that occurred while in office. In these instances, the official impeached remains in their position and continues to serve their period until a court makes the verdict that orders them to be exiled from office or until they depart by an alternative method. However, it is crucial to understand that impeachment isn’t an election that is partisan in Congress. It is a mechanism that is designed to stop the abuse of power by officials in government and is meant to act as a check and balance to those who would use their position to do things that are unlawful under the Constitution. It is important to remember that the term “impeachment” can be used in many different contexts; however, it’s difficult to know what the word means. For instance, it’s commonplace to hear people use the phrase “to impeach” as a method of disapproving of an individual or thing and not as an official legal term indicating that the person should be exiled from office. Certain scholars consider that impeachment could serve a purpose, even without removal. In a new study on comparative law from Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Huq, along with David Landau, argues that it can be utilized to allow presidential or semi-presidential structures to come out of crises without going overboard with the removal. They also bring up the recent instance in South America where former leaders were incarcerated for bogus allegations, in addition to several other examples.