There is no easy answer to the question of which form of cricket is better, T20 or ODI. It depends on a number of factors, including personal preference, playing style and the specific game situation.
In general, T20 cricket is considered to be more exciting and fast-paced than ODI cricket. This is because each team has only 20 overs (120 balls) to score as many runs as possible. This means that there is less time for batsmen to settle in and build an innings, so they have to go for their shots from the start. This often leads to more boundaries being hit and more wickets falling, making for a more action-packed and thrilling game.
However, some purists argue that this also makes T20 cricket less tactical and strategic than ODI cricket. In an ODI match, teams have 50 overs (300 balls) to bat, meaning that there is more time for a batting team to plan their innings and build partnerships between batsmen. This can make for a more interesting and analytical game, as players have to think about how best to use their resources over a longer period of time.
ultimately, it comes down to personal preference as to which form of the game you prefer. Some people like the excitement and pace of T20 cricket, while others prefer the greater tactical battles of an ODI match. There is no right or wrong answer – it’s just up to you which you enjoy watching or playing most!