Initially, any potential claimant must prove professional negligence on the professional’s behalf (i.e. a failure to exercise reasonable skill and care in the discharge of its services). A claim can be brought in contract or tort/idelict (i.e. common law). It is often more difficult to succeed in a claim in tort as the following tests must be satisfied:nnthe plaintiff must prove that the professional owed him a duty of care.nthe plaintiff must prove that the professional has breached that duty.nthe plaintiff has suffered financial loss as a direct result of that breach.nIf an allegation of professional negligence is upheld, the professional is likely to be liable for the losses incurred by the plaintiff which arise as a reasonably foreseeable consequence of their actions. The professional will often be responsible for the plaintiff’s legal costs and these can be substantial. Large sums of money are often spent simply trying to recover fairly minor losses.nnDirect financial losses (economic and consequential loss) as opposed to the cost of rectifying a defect are implicit under contract unless specifically excluded. There is more of a grey area arising out of the question of liability for economic and consequential loss at common law although recent judgements have allowed such losses to be recovered