This is still a process that takes some time. The birds I think are responding more quickly than the trees will just because their lifespan is different, and they are mobile, and they can move in the landscape much more quickly than the trees and the plant community. Part of what we learned from this research is that (various wetlands) all operate as sort of a network on the landscape. There's the big, enormous spots that are probably source habitats where more young are produced than are lost. They export individuals to other sites, and then there's the smaller [habitat], isolated, farther away, more encroached by development and roads. And so I think that there's a huge role for the state, for towns, for individuals, to think about the smaller ones, because they're still going to be important for (birds) that are able to move into the better habitats eventually as stopover habitats during migration. Acquisition is nice, but I also think that there are ways to try to steer development away from these smaller spots, try to be cognizant of where we put trails and, you know, give them sort of a buffer, [and] work with forest management entities. It would be nice to see some more attention paid to the smaller (parcels).