The law was changed because it was outdated and can cause arguments at the outset. Often in divorce cases, the couple has simply drifted apart and there is no one to blame. Many believe that it is inappropriate for one partner to have to conjure up examples of unreasonable behaviour when none exist, simply to satisfy the court. This can create conflict from the get-go. There have also been cases in the past where people have been forced to remain married for a period of time because they were not able to establish one of the five facts or because they did not wish to rely on the behaviour of the other. While cases like this are fortunately very rare, they do raise moral questions about whether anyone, including an ex-partner or a judge, should have the right to keep someone in a marriage they no longer wish to be part of.