The Berlin Senate is apparently also making a big exception when it comes to the antitrust law and the exercise of a monopoly. In Berlin, competition policy is handled differently by the Senate and its subsidiary BWB than is desired for fair competition, or is regulated by the law against unfair competition, in particular by the anti-cartel ban. While BWB is in free competition with manufacturers and suppliers of water dispensers, they were favored by the Berlin Senate between 2018 and 2021 with 8,000,000 euros in funding for the installation of outdoor drinking fountains. This is despite the fact that there are other competitors who could have supplied the drinking water wells required by the Blue Community resolution, at lower prices and even with the required accessibility and year-round ability to use the device. In contrast to the Kaiserbrunnen designed in the 80s, which are neither barrier-free nor available at a child-friendly height and also run permanently on top of that, as if water were an abundance of water today. A clear case of unfair competition, apparently with the aim of compensating for the billions in costs incurred by the buyback of BWB from RWE and VEOLIA in 2013. BWB did not have to participate in tenders for the supply of water dispensers for school catering because, as a subsidiary of the client, the contract was awarded directly to BWB - to the exclusion of free competition. As a result of branched nepotism, BWB was commissioned to supply 600 school water dispensers. It is clear that Berlin politicians have found a direct way to slide from the completed airport scandal to the next scandal. Exploiting a monopoly and building a cartel.