In the competitive world of business, interactions between competitors can sometimes cross the line into actionable territory. In Massachusetts, the legal concept of 'tortious interference with contract' plays a crucial role.
To initiate a claim, there must be an existing or potential contract or economic relationship with a third party. This relationship can take various forms, from formal contracts to oral agreements, ongoing business dealings, or even prospective relationships that haven't solidified into contracts. This often pertains to customer relationships but can also extend to agreements with former employees.
To establish a case, you need to demonstrate that someone's actions intentionally disrupted your contractual relationship. This involves proving that the defendant knew about the relationship and intended to interfere with it. Direct communication with the third party or actions hindering their business dealings with you are examples of intentional interference.
The defendant's conduct must involve either an improper motive or wrongful actions. Economic motivations, such as competition, are generally considered proper. Improper motives might include personal grudges or attempts to gain leverage in other disputes. The critical factor is often whether the means of interference were improper. Improper means may include misrepresentation, breaches of contract, or breaches of fiduciary duty.
​ Learn more about contract interference by visiting us at interference with contract.