1. 1\.  Mukherjee S., Vaishnava S., Hooper L. V. Multi-layered regulation of intestinal antimicrobial defense. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:3019–3027. pmid:18560756
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
2. 2\.  Selsted M.E., Ouellette A.J. Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response. Nat Immunol. 2005;6:551–557. pmid:15908936
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
3. 3\.  Shifrin D.A., Tyska M.J. Ready…aim…fire into the lumen: a new role for enterocyte microvilli in gut host defense. Gut Microbes. 2012;3:460–2. pmid:22825496
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
4. 4\.  Maroux S., Coudrier E., Feracci H., Gorvel J.-P., Louvard D. Molecular organization of the intestinal brush border. Biochimie. 1988;70:1297–1306. pmid:3147722
*  View Article 90198-8 "Go to article")
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
5. 5\.  Mooseker M.S. Organization, chemistry, and assembly of the cytoskeletal apparatus of the intestinal brush border. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:209–41. pmid:3916317
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
6. 6\.  Weck M.L., Crawley S.W., Stone C.R., Tyska M.J. Myosin-7b Promotes Distal Tip Localization of the Intermicrovillar Adhesion Complex. Curr Biol. 2016;26:2717–2728. pmid:27666969
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
7. 7\.  Crawley S.W., Weck M.L., Grega-Larson N.E., Shifrin D.A., Tyska M.J. ANKS4B Is Essential for Intermicrovillar Adhesion Complex Formation. Dev Cell. 2016;36:190–200. pmid:26812018
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
8. 8\.  Pinette J.A., Mao S., Millis B.A., Krystofiak E.S., Faust J.J., Tyska M.J. Brush border protocadherin CDHR2 promotes the elongation and maximized packing of microvilli in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 2018;30:108–118. pmid:30403560
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
9. 9\.  Crawley S.W., Shifrin D.A., Grega-Larson N.E., McConnell R.E., Benesh A.E., Mao S., et al. Intestinal brush border assembly driven by protocadherin-based intermicrovillar adhesion. Cell. 2014;157:433–446. pmid:24725409
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
10. 10\.  Crawley S.W., Mooseker M.S., Tyska M.J. Shaping the intestinal brush border. J Cell Biol. 2014;207:441–51. pmid:25422372
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
11. 11\.  Li J., He Y., Lu Q., Zhang M. Mechanistic Basis of Organization of the Harmonin/USH1C-Mediated Brush Border Microvilli Tip-Link Complex. Dev Cell. 2016;36:179–89. pmid:26812017
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
12. 12\.  Bailey D.S., Freedman A.R., Price S.C., Chescoe D., Ciclitira P.J. Early biochemical responses of the small intestine of coeliac patients to wheat gluten. Gut. 1989;30:78–85. pmid:2563983
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
13. 13\.  Wilson W., Scott R.B., Pinto A., Robertson M.A. Intractable diarrhea in a newborn infant: microvillous inclusion disease. Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;15:61–4. pmid:11173328
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
14. 14\.  Vallance B.A., Chan C., Robertson M.L., Finlay B.B. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections: emerging themes in pathogenesis and prevention. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16:771–8. pmid:12464970
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
15. 15\.  Khubchandani S.R., Vohra P., Chitale A.R., Sidana P. Microvillous inclusion disease—an ultrastructural diagnosis: with a review of the literature. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2011;35:87–91. pmid:21299349
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
16. 16\.  Bitner-Glindzicz M., Glaser B., Lindley K.J., Rutland P., Blaydon D., Smith V. V., et al. A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism,enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene. Nat Genet. 2000;26:56–60. pmid:10973248
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
17. 17\.  Hussain K., Bitner-Glindzicz M., Blaydon D., Lindley K.J., Thompson D.A., Kriss T., et al. Infantile hyperinsulinism associated with enteropathy, deafness and renal tubulopathy: clinical manifestations of a syndrome caused by a contiguous gene deletion located on chromosome 11p. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17:1613–21. pmid:15645695
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
18. 18\.  In J., Foulke-Abel J., Zachos N.C., Hansen A.-M., Kaper J.B., Bernstein H.D., et al. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Reduces Mucus and Intermicrovillar Bridges in Human Stem Cell-Derived Colonoids. C Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2:48–62.e3. pmid:26855967
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
19. 19\.  Chao Y., Jin J., Wang L., Jin X., Yang L., Zhang B. Transcriptome Analysis of lncRNA-mRNA Interactions in Chronic Atrophic Gastritis. Front Genet. 2020;11:612951. pmid:33505433
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
20. 20\.  Duangkumpha K., Stoll T., Phetcharaburanin J., Yongvanit P., Thanan R., Techasen A., et al. Urine proteomics study reveals potential biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma and periductal fibrosis. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221024. pmid:31425520
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
21. 21\.  McConnell R.E., Benesh A.E., Mao S., Tabb D.L., Tyska M.J. Proteomic analysis of the enterocyte brush border. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G914–26. pmid:21330445
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
22. 22\.  Takeichi M. Cadherins: a molecular family important in selective cell–cell adhesion. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:237–52. pmid:2197976
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
23. 23\.  Sano K., Tanihara H., Heimark R.L., Obata S., Davidson M., St John T., et al. Protocadherins: a large family of cadherin-related molecules in central nervous system. EMBO J. 1993;12:2249–56. Available from:  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=413453&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract  [cited 2016 May 11]. pmid:8508762
* View Article
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
24. 24\.  Frank M., Kemler R. Protocadherins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002;14:557–62. Available from:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12231349  [cited 2016 May 17].
* View Article
*  Google Scholar 
25. 25\.  Gumbiner B.M. Regulation of cadherin-mediated adhesion in morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:622–34. pmid:16025097
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
26. 26\.  Pei J., Grishin N. V. Expansion of divergent SEA domains in cell surface proteins and nucleoporin 54. Protein Sci. 2017;26:617–630. pmid:27977898
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
27. 27\.  De-la-Torre P., Choudhary D., Araya-Secchi R., Narui Y., Sotomayor M. A Mechanically Weak Extracellular Membrane-Adjacent Domain Induces Dimerization of Protocadherin-15. Biophys J. 2018;115:2368–2385. pmid:30527337
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
28. 28\.  Ge J., Elferich J., Goehring A., Zhao J., Schuck P., Gouaux E. Structure of mouse protocadherin 15 of the stereocilia tip link in complex with LHFPL5. Elife. 2018;7. pmid:30070639
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
29. 29\.  Bork P., Patthy L. The SEA module: A new extracellular domain associated with _O_ -glycosylation. Protein Sci. 1995;4:1421–1425. pmid:7670383
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
30. 30\.  Hulpiau P., van Roy F. Molecular evolution of the cadherin superfamily. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41:349–369. pmid:18848899
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
31. 31\.  Goldberg M., Peshkovsky C., Shifteh A., Al-Awqati Q. μ-Protocadherin, a Novel Developmentally Regulated Protocadherin with Mucin-like Domains. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:24622–24629. pmid:10801787
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
32. 32\.  Sotomayor M., Gaudet R., Corey D.P. Sorting out a promiscuous superfamily: towards cadherin connectomics. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24:524–36. pmid:24794279
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
33. 33\.  Elledge H.M., Kazmierczak P., Clark P., Joseph J.S., Kolatkar A., Kuhn P., et al. Structure of the N terminus of cadherin 23 reveals a new adhesion mechanism for a subset of cadherin superfamily members. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:10708–10712. pmid:20498078
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
34. 34\.  Sotomayor M., Weihofen W.A., Gaudet R., Corey D.P. Structural Determinants of Cadherin-23 Function in Hearing and Deafness. Neuron. 2010;66:85–100. pmid:20399731
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
35. 35\.  Kazmierczak P., Sakaguchi H., Tokita J., Wilson-Kubalek E.M., Milligan R.A., Müller U., et al. Cadherin 23 and protocadherin 15 interact to form tip-link filaments in sensory hair cells. Nature. 2007;449:87–91. pmid:17805295
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
36. 36\.  Sotomayor M., Weihofen W.A., Gaudet R., Corey D.P. Structure of a force-conveying cadherin bond essential for inner-ear mechanotransduction. Nature. 2012;492:128–32. pmid:23135401
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
37. 37\.  Behrendt M., Krahn M.P., Al-Bayati H., Amiri M., Rizk S., Naim H.Y. Cadherin-related protein 24 induces morphological changes and partial cell polarization by facilitating direct cell–cell interactions. Biol Chem. 2012;393. pmid:22628312
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
38. 38\.  Pepermans E., Petit C. The tip-link molecular complex of the auditory mechano-electrical transduction machinery. Hear Res. 2015;330:10–7. pmid:26049141
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
39. 39\.  Jaiganesh A., De-la-Torre P., Patel A.A., Termine D.J., Velez-Cortes F., Chen C., et al. Zooming in on Cadherin-23: Structural Diversity and Potential Mechanisms of Inherited Deafness. Structure. 2018. pmid:30033219
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
40. 40\.  Choudhary D., Narui Y., Neel B.L., Wimalasena L.N., Klanseck C.F., De-la-Torre P., et al. Structural determinants of protocadherin-15 mechanics and function in hearing and balance perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:24837–24848. pmid:32963095
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
41. 41\.  Shapiro L., Fannon A.M., Kwong P.D., Thompson A., Lehmann M.S., Grübel G., et al. Structural basis of cell–cell adhesion by cadherins. Nature. 1995;374:327–37. pmid:7885471
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
42. 42\.  Parisini E., Higgins J.M.G., Liu J.H., Brenner M.B., Wang J.H. The crystal structure of human E-cadherin domains 1 and 2, and comparison with other cadherins in the context of adhesion mechanism. J Mol Biol. 2007;373:401–11. pmid:17850815
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
43. 43\.  Brasch J., Harrison O.J., Honig B., Shapiro L. Thinking outside the cell: how cadherins drive adhesion. Trends Cell Biol. 2012;22:299–310. pmid:22555008
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
44. 44\.  Gilson A.I., Marshall-Christensen A., Choi J.-M., Shakhnovich E.I. The Role of Evolutionary Selection in the Dynamics of Protein Structure Evolution. Biophys J. 2017;112:1350–1365. pmid:28402878
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
45. 45\.  Modak D., Sotomayor M. Identification of an adhesive interface for the non-clustered δ1 protocadherin-1 involved in respiratory diseases. Commun Biol. 2019;2:354. pmid:31583286
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
46. 46\.  Cooper S.R., Jontes J.D., Sotomayor M. Structural determinants of adhesion by Protocadherin-19 and implications for its role in epilepsy. Elife. 2016;5. pmid:27787195
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
47. 47\.  Nagar B., Overduin M., Ikura M., Rini J.M. Structural basis of calcium-induced E-cadherin rigidification and dimerization. Nature. 1996;380:360–4. pmid:8598933
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
48. 48\.  Goodman K.M., Rubinstein R., Thu C.A., Bahna F., Mannepalli S., Ahlsén G., et al. Structural Basis of Diverse Homophilic Recognition by Clustered α- and β-Protocadherins. Neuron. 2016. pmid:27161523
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
49. 49\.  Nicoludis J.M., Vogt B.E., Green A.G., Schärfe C.P., Marks D.S., Gaudet R. Antiparallel protocadherin homodimers use distinct affinity- and specificity-mediating regions in cadherin repeats 1–4. Elife. 2016;5. pmid:27472898
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
50. 50\.  Rubinstein R., Thu C.A., Goodman K.M., Wolcott H.N., Bahna F., Mannepalli S., et al. Molecular Logic of Neuronal Self-Recognition through Protocadherin Domain Interactions. Cell. 2015;163:629–42. pmid:26478182
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
51. 51\.  Nicoludis J.M., Lau S.-Y., Schärfe C.P.I., Marks D.S., Weihofen W.A., Gaudet R. Structure and Sequence Analyses of Clustered Protocadherins Reveal Antiparallel Interactions that Mediate Homophilic Specificity. Structure. 2015;23:2087–98. pmid:26481813
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
52. 52\.  Harrison O.J., Brasch J., Katsamba P.S., Ahlsen G., Noble A.J., Dan H., et al. Family-wide Structural and Biophysical Analysis of Binding Interactions among Non-clustered δ-Protocadherins. Cell Rep. 2020;30:2655–2671.e7. pmid:32101743
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
53. 53\.  Schreiner D., Weiner J.A. Combinatorial homophilic interaction between gamma-protocadherin multimers greatly expands the molecular diversity of cell adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14893–8. pmid:20679223
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
54. 54\.  Jin X., Walker M.A, Felsövályi K., Vendome J., Bahna F., Mannepalli S., et al. Crystal structures of Drosophila N-cadherin ectodomain regions reveal a widely used class of Ca2+−free interdomain linkers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:E127–34. pmid:22171007
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
55. 55\.  Araya-Secchi R., Neel B.L., Sotomayor M. An elastic element in the protocadherin-15 tip link of the inner ear. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13458. pmid:27857071
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
56. 56\.  Powers R.E., Gaudet R., Sotomayor M. A Partial Calcium-Free Linker Confers Flexibility to Inner-Ear Protocadherin-15. Structure. 2017;25:482–495. pmid:28238533
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
57. 57\.  Brasch J., Harrison O.J., Ahlsen G., Carnally S.M., Henderson R.M., Honig B., et al. Structure and binding mechanism of vascular endothelial cadherin: a divergent classical cadherin. J Mol Biol. 2011;408:57–73. pmid:21269602
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
58. 58\.  Ponstingl H., Henrick K., Thornton J.M. Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state. Proteins. 2000;41:47–57. Available from:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10944393  [cited 2016 May 24].
* View Article
*  Google Scholar 
59. 59\.  Nicoludis J.M., Green A.G., Walujkar S., May E.J., Sotomayor M., Marks D.S., et al. Interaction specificity of clustered protocadherins inferred from sequence covariation and structural analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:17825–17830. pmid:31431536
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
60. 60\.  Choudhary D., Kumar A., Magliery T.J., Sotomayor M. Using thermal scanning assays to test protein–protein interactions of inner-ear cadherins. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189546. pmid:29261728
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
61. 61\.  Narui Y., Sotomayor M. Tuning Inner-Ear Tip-Link Affinity Through Alternatively Spliced Variants of Protocadherin-15. Biochemistry. 2018;57. pmid:29443515
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
62. 62\.  Katsamba P., Carroll K., Ahlsen G., Bahna F., Vendome J., Posy S., et al. Linking molecular affinity and cellular specificity in cadherin-mediated adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:11594–9. pmid:19553217
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
63. 63\.  Goldberg M., Wei M., Tycko B., Falikovich I., Warburton D. Identification and expression analysis of the human μ-protocadherin gene in fetal and adult kidneys. Am J Physiol Physiol. 2002;283:F454–F463. pmid:12167596
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
64. 64\.  Brasch J., Goodman K.M., Noble A.J., Rapp M., Mannepalli S., Bahna F., et al. Visualization of clustered protocadherin neuronal self-recognition complexes. Nature. 2019;1. pmid:30971825
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
65. 65\.  Lefebvre J.L. Neuronal territory formation by the atypical cadherins and clustered protocadherins. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;69. pmid:28756270
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
66. 66\.  Duguay D., Foty R. A., Steinberg M. S. Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants. Dev Biol. 2003;253. pmid:12645933
*  View Article 00016-7 "Go to article")
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
67. 67\.  Krahn M.P., Rizk S., Alfalah M., Behrendt M., Naim H.Y. Protocadherin of the Liver, Kidney, and Colon Associates with Detergent-resistant Membranes during Cellular Differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13193–13200. pmid:20159971
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
68. 68\.  Okazaki N., Takahashi N., Kojima S.-I., Masuho Y., Koga H. Protocadherin LKC, a new candidate for a tumor suppressor of colon and liver cancers, its association with contact inhibition of cell proliferation. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1139–1148. pmid:12117771
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
69. 69\.  Ose R., Yanagawa T., Ikeda S., Ohara O., Koga H. PCDH24-induced contact inhibition involves downregulation of β-catenin signaling. Mol Oncol. 2009;3:54–66. pmid:19383367
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
70. 70\.  Bujko M., Kober P., Statkiewicz M., Mikula M., Ligaj M., Zwierzchowski L., et al. Epigenetic-Mediated Downregulation of μ -Protocadherin in Colorectal Tumours. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:1–9. pmid:25972897
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
71. 71\.  Losi L., Grande A. Involvement of μ-protocadherin in colorectal carcinogenesis: a promise for clinico-pathological evaluation. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29:11–9. pmid:23904255
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
72. 72\.  Chuang S.-C., Hsi E., Wang S.-N., Yu M.-L., Lee K.-T., Juo S.-H.H. Polymorphism at the mucin-like protocadherin gene influences susceptibility to gallstone disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:2089–2093. pmid:21839066
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
73. 73\.  Dickinson D.J., Weis W.I., Nelson W.J. Protein Evolution in Cell and Tissue Development: Going Beyond Sequence and Transcriptional Analysis. Dev Cell. 2011;21:32–34. pmid:21763606
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
74. 74\.  Dionne G., Qiu X., Rapp M., Liang X., Zhao B., Peng G., et al. Mechanotransduction by PCDH15 Relies on a Novel _cis_ -Dimeric Architecture. Neuron. 2018;99:480–492.e5. pmid:30057206
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
75. 75\.  Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–26.
* View Article
*  Google Scholar 
76. 76\.  McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Winn M.D., Storoni L.C., Read R.J. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Cryst. 2007;40:658–674. pmid:19461840
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
77. 77\.  Cowtan K. The _Buccaneer_ software for automated model building. 1. Tracing protein chains. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006;62:1002–1011. pmid:16929101
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
78. 78\.  Cowtan K. Fitting molecular fragments into electron density. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2007;64:83–89. pmid:18094471
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
79. 79\.  Källberg M., Wang H., Wang S., Peng J., Wang Z., Lu H., et al. Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:1511–1522. pmid:22814390
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
80. 80\.  Emsley P., Lohkamp B., Scott W.G., Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot., Acta Crystallogr. D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. pmid:20383002
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
81. 81\.  Murshudov G.N., Skubák P., Lebedev A. A., Pannu N.S., Steiner R. A., Nicholls R. A., et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67:355–367. pmid:21460454
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
82. 82\.  Emond M.R., Biswas S., Blevins C.J., Jontes J.D. A complex of Protocadherin-19 and N-cadherin mediates a novel mechanism of cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 2011;195:1115–21. pmid:22184198
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
83. 83\.  Emond M.R., Jontes J.D. Bead aggregation assays for the characterization of putative cell adhesion molecules. J Vis Exp. 2014:e51762. pmid:25350770
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
84. 84\.  Kwon M., Firestein B.L. DNA transfection: calcium phosphate method. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1018:107–10. pmid:23681621
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
85. 85\.  Barry J., Gu Y., Jukkola P., O’Neill B., Gu H., Mohler P.J., et al. Ankyrin-G directly binds to kinesin-1 to transport voltage-gated Na+ channels into axons. Dev Cell. 2014;28:117–31. pmid:24412576
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
86. 86\.  Jiang M., Chen G. High Ca2+−phosphate transfection efficiency in low-density neuronal cultures. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:695–700. pmid:17406298
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
87. 87\.  Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. pmid:15034147
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
88. 88\.  Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A., Stones-Havas S., Cheung M., Sturrock S., et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–9. pmid:22543367
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
89. 89\.  Waterhouse A.M., Procter J.B., Martin D.M.A., Clamp M., Barton G.J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. pmid:19151095
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
90. 90\.  Henikoff S., Henikoff J.G. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:10915–9. pmid:1438297
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
91. 91\.  Ashkenazy H., Abadi S., Martz E., Chay O., Mayrose I., Pupko T., et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016. pmid:27166375
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
92. 92\.  Ashkenazy H., Erez E., Martz E., Pupko T., Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: Calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:529–533. pmid:20478830
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
93. 93\.  Celniker G., Nimrod G., Ashkenazy H., Glaser F., Martz E., Mayrose I., et al. ConSurf: Using evolutionary data to raise testable hypotheses about protein function. Isr J Chem. 2013;53:199–206.
*  View Article 
*  Google Scholar 
94. 94\.  Landau M, Mayrose I, Rosenberg Y, Glaser F, Martz E, Pupko T, et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W299–302. pmid:15980475
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
95. 95\.  Glaser F., Pupko T., Paz I., Bell R.E., Bechor-Shental D., Martz E., et al. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:163–4. pmid:12499312
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
96. 96\.  Steentoft C., Vakhrushev S.Y., Joshi H.J., Kong Y., Vester-Christensen M.B., Schjoldager K.T.-B.G., et al. Precision mapping of the human O-GalNAc glycoproteome through SimpleCell technology. EMBO J. 2013;32:1478–88. pmid:23584533
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
97. 97\.  Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:33–38. pmid:8744570
*  View Article 00018-5 "Go to article")
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
98. 98\.  Phillips J.C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem. 2005;26:1781–1802. pmid:16222654
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
99. 99\.  Huang J., MacKerell A.D.J. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data. J Comput Chem. 2014;34:2135–2145.
*  View Article 
*  Google Scholar 
100. 100\.  Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K. Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11:224–30. pmid:11297932
*  View Article 00194-9 "Go to article")
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
101. 101\.  Sotomayor M., Schulten K. Single-molecule experiments in vitro and in silico. Science. 2007;316:1144–1148. pmid:17525328
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
102. 102\.  Grubmüller H. Force probe molecular dynamics simulations. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;305:493–515. Available from:  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15943012  .
* View Article
*  Google Scholar 
103. 103\.  Franz F., Daday C., Gräter F. Advances in molecular simulations of protein mechanical properties and function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020;61:132–138. pmid:31954324
*  View Article 
*  PubMed/NCBI 
*  Google Scholar 
104. 104\.  Gray M. E., Modak D., Tamilselvan E., Sotomayor M. Data from: Raw images for bead aggregation assays—Heterophilic and homophilic cadherin interactions in intestinal intermicrovillar links are species dependent. Dryad Digital Repository; 2021.
*  View Article 
*  Google Scholar