it 's actually not so bad that dreamworks decided to release the love letter at about the same time as star wars episode i :
the phantom menace , because this way less people will have to sit through
this dreadful little comedy .
and no , i really do n't feel guilty about wishing this movie death at the box - office .
really , i do n't .
not at all .
the plot has been done before -- a mysterious , unaddressed love letter shows up in a small town , causing confusion for everyone who reads it .
the center of the ensuing disaster is bookstore owner helen ( kate capshaw , and by the way , what is it with bookstore owner main characters ?
in the past year and a half we 've seen them in life is beautiful , you 've got mail , this movie , and the upcoming notting hill ) , who finds the letter in between couch cushions in the bookstore .
she immediately starts testing other people to see who it might be from , and comes to the ( incorrect ) conclusion that the author of the note is a young employee played by tom everett scott .
he , reading the letter himself , assumes that she wrote it for him .
after a while , they fall in love ( well , duh ) .
kate feels guilty about getting in a relationship with someone more than twenty years younger than her , and she also feels guilty because at the same time she is also involved with the town fireman ( tom selleck ) .
to add to her turmoil , her mother shows up ( blythe danner , who apparently must have had her daughter when she was about 9 ) and her trusted bookstore manager ( deadpan ellen degeneres ) quits .
supporting characters are n't called supporting for nothing .
their purpose is n't just to move the plot along , they 're also supposed to give the storyline a backbone .
to do this , they must exhibit at least marginal depth and must also be interesting .
rarely can a movie work
if it puts an interesting protagonist in the middle and surrounds her with hackneyed , dull , cardboard secondary characters , especially when at the core of the movie is the protagonist 's various interactions with them .
this is the love letter 's damning error .
capshaw 's character is as good as i have seen present in recent romantic comedies , but the people that surround her are all either underwritten or purely one - dimensional .
because of that , the love letter is awkward and insincere .
even worse -- it 's a bore .
i liked capshaw and her helen , but everyone else is painfully fake , undermining the little drama or sexual tension that has the potential to exist .
there is nothing particularly hilarious about all this either -- and besides degeneres ' wisecracks ,
there 's little that is even a little amusing .
this is not a completely thoughtless film and director peter ho - sun chan does a good job of portraying helen 's yearnings and various subtle complexities .
but it 's far from profound .
there is n't a common theme running through the proceedings , thus the movie seems thoughtfully pointless .
really , this is a harmless little movie ; it 's far from an abomination
and it 's not torturous to sit through .
but bad , it is .
awful , it also is .
the love letter is a failure , and an inane failure at that . ?
1999 eugene novikov&#137 ;
it 's far from profound . there is n't a common theme running through the proceedings , thus the movie seems thoughtfully pointless damning error but bad , it is . awful , it also is hackneyed , dull , cardboard secondary characters all either underwritten or purely one - dimensional there 's little that is even a little amusing awkward and insincere . even worse -- it 's a bore this dreadful little comedy painfully fake a failure , and an inane failure at that wishing this movie death