the formula is simple .
trap a varied group of people on an isolated location , then pop in a seemingly unstoppable monster to kill them one by one .
these have been the successful ingredients for many good films ( the thing , alien , aliens , and tremors to name a few ) .
so , why is it that so many films following this recipe end up pathetically bad ?
( see the relic for a particularly putrid example . )
perhaps it is simply too easy to forget the necessary binding ingredient : effort and ideas .
deep rising meets these two requirements part way , but not enough to salvage the film .
treat williams is finnegan , the leader of a small boat crew who hire out their services ( and their boat ) for any activity . . .
no questions asked .
this time , however , they may have gone too far .
their passengers , led by the ominous wes studi , are the type of multi - national terrorist squads usually only seen in die hard films .
and their cargo .
. .
let 's just say it has very high explosive potential .
what is the target of these thieves ?
why , the argonauticus , of course , a high tech luxury cruise yacht on its maiden voyage .
but something else is hunting the argonauticus . . .
something ancient and deadly .
by the time the thieves arrive , nearly everyone on board the ship has been killed .
and now the creature senses fresh meat !
so , you have the thieves and their mercenary boat crew , joining forces with the surviving passengers ( including the ship owner canton ( anthony heald ) , and a thief with less lofty goals , trillian ( famke janssen ) ) against the terror from the deep .
and the monster gets to pick them off one by one .
fortunately for the creature , this particular band of criminals happens to be the dumbest the world can offer .
why else would they indulge in petty squabbling while they watch their friends become fish food .
if there 's a more clarion call for unity , i do n't know what it might be .
it 's pretty easy to guess who will get killed off when .
there are no surprises in that the most interesting characters seem to last until the end .
for the most part , the watery tentacles seem to be acting on the audience 's impulses to get rid of the most boring characters first .
( although i wonder if the filmmakers might have extended djimon hounsou 's life a bit if they knew this would be released so soon after his acclaim for amistad .
) treat williams is a passable hero , and famke janssen does her best julia roberts impersonation .
but while wes studi and anthony heald are particularly slimy , very little of the rest of the company stand out in any way .
the biggest treat in the film , however , has to be pantucci , kevin j .
o'connor 's whining engine - boy , under finnegan 's employ .
his constant quips may be a bit over - written , but they manage to capture the same vein of nerve - addled humor that bill paxton delivered as hudson in aliens ( or todd graff as hippie in the abyss , for that matter ) .
it 's just a stock part ( the comic - relief character ) , but it almost makes this tired alien clone bearable . as far as the monster goes , although the cgi is done well , the creature has no logical consistency . think back to the great ( or even just good ) movie monsters .
they all had a set of " rules " about what they could do , and how and why they would do it .
part of the joy of those films was slowly discovering , along with the heroes , just what those rules are .
the tentacle monster in deep rising does n't have a set of rules . . .
or if it does , not a very good one .
it merely eats ( or drinks , as the case may be ) , and there is no rhyme or reason for what it does in order to do so .
the film never explains why the argonauticus is attacked in the first place .
it simply happens .
the action scenes are decent , but few are noteworthy .
the film definitely does suffer from its proximity to titanic .
deep rising 's peril in the water scenes pale next to cameron 's ( but can you really blame them ) .
unfortunately , deep rising 's efforts are more on par with speed 2 .
on the plus side , however , the film 's closing image shows some promise for a potentially interesting ( but unlikely ) sequel .
perhaps you 'd be better off waiting for that one .
it 's pretty easy to guess there are no surprises few are noteworthy definitely does suffer has no logical consistency