logical time travel movies are a near - impossibility . considering that the skeptic 's best argument against the possibility of time travel is the idea of altered realities , writing a script that deals with this problem is an imposing task .
occasionally , we get a film that does manage it .
terry gilliam 's " 12 monkeys " was one such film .
but more frequently , we get films that do n't much deal with it at all .
there is one question to ask in this case : does the film have other virtues that override the existing logical inconsistencies ?
the " terminator " films made up for them with exciting action , " back to the future " did it with an entertaining story , and the new film " frequency " pulls off the trick with a strong package of its own .
is " frequency " filled with plot holes ?
yes .
does it matter ?
not really .
the film opens in october of 1969 .
firefighter frank sullivan ( dennis quaid ) puts his life on the line every time he suits up for his job , then goes home to his loving wife julia ( elizabeth mitchell ) and son johnny ( daniel henson ) .
the double - pronged story flashes forward to 1999 , where johnny ( now jim caviezel ) is all grown up and working as a police detective .
a strange occurrence -- the appearance of aurora borealis over new york city -- allows father and son to communicate through the same ham radio frank used in ' 69 and that john has found in the present day .
though both are initially skeptical of the idea , john eventually takes this opportunity to warn his father against his impending death in a warehouse fire , and he succeeds in saving frank from certain doom .
now flooded with memories of a full life with his father alive , john is initially overjoyed , until he discovers that the changes to the timeline have been disastrous :
a serial killer that would have died has instead lived to kill seven more women .
frank and john now must work together to set things right , with john using the information he has gathered in the future to instruct frank on what to do in the past .
the premise of " frequency " is unusual , and requires getting over one very important mental hurdle to fully accept : john and frank are the only ones conscious of how the timeline has been changed as a result of their actions .
this is n't explained ; you just have to go with it .
when frank does n't die in a fire , john is the only one who remembers it differently , while everyone else remembers it the new way .
the concept also runs into problems concerning just how synchronous the two realities -- 1969 and 1999 -- are to each other .
sometimes frank 's changing the past results in something happening right away in john 's world , and sometimes john gets the changes ahead of time .
now , the filmmakers might have perfectly good explanations for this , and i could probably come up with something fairly convoluted ( but nevertheless logical ) if i thought about it hard enough ( for example , the reason john gets advance information of the serial killer 's murders was because the change had already happened in frank 's world , and john is only witnessing the * projection * of that change ) , but explanations are n't really the point .
when " frequency " gets cooking , it 's a riveting little thriller , even if it is confusing .
what matters to a film like this is if the plot makes sense in the moment , and " frequency " works as long as it keeps moving .
the film manages to be engaging despite the logical confusion .
director gregory hoblit and screenwriter
toby emmerich structure " frequency " as good hollywood entertainment , establishing decent , likable characters ,
making us care for them , and setting up a goal to be reached and a conflict to be resolved .
i liked many of the creative touches : the split screens , allowing us to see how the universe is being affected in both realities , and the greater framework of baseball to drive the action forward .
it actually uses the 1969 mets - orioles world series ( the one that featured the amazin ' mets ) to great effect -- frank uses john 's advance knowledge of the series outcome to convince his friends to believe him .
( admittedly , this device may only be of interest to a baseball fan like myself . )
i even liked the final scene , which features frank and john both fighting the same man simultaneously in different time periods .
some may find this scene blindingly confusing , as the reality shifts start coming fast and furious , but it does make sense if you think about it ( and give the script a lot of leeway ) , and let 's face it : it 's a darn cool way to end the film .
there are enough surprises and plot twists in " frequency " to keep you on your toes , and as a result the movie avoids growing stagnant .
the other major thing to appreciate
about " frequency " is the handling of the father - son relationship . quaid and caviezel
carry off their parts easily
; it 's a rock - solid job from both actors .
the relationship is instantly credible because they find the human truth behind the high concept : how would one react to being able to communicate with a dead relative , or with a future descendant ?
watching the exchanges between frank and john will give you a pretty good idea of how to answer that question .
the credibility of the human relationship is absolutely crucial to the rest of the film ; if we do n't believe in the characters , we do n't care about the outcome of the thriller plot .
here , we do care , because we like the lead actors .
i also liked some of the supporting cast members .
elizabeth mitchell gets stuck with two thankless roles , playing julia the doting wife * and * mother , but still performs admirably .
andre braugher , late of the television show " homicide : life on the street , " gives a nice supporting turn as frank 's best friend and future colleague of john .
he has a lovely scene in a diner in which he tries to explain the situation to julia while frank 's world series predictions come true before his very eyes .
braugher strikes the perfect facial expression here , simultaneously dismayed and amused .
perhaps the only thing i did n't like about " frequency " is the overly sentimental coda , during which the camera 's focus goes a little too soft and the baseball theme gets carried overboard .
but that 's only because the film had already earned a poignancy without resorting to cheap tactics .
i freely acknowledge that " frequency " may best work as a " guy " movie , since it focuses on the very male - oriented idea of father - son relationships ( echoes of " field of dreams " can be easily heard ) , but the underlying concept is universally applicable . who would n't want to speak with a long - dead parent ? or see how their children turn out ? " tell me about your life , son " -- excuse me while i mist up .
and do n't call me a sissy .
i liked many of the creative touches keep you on your toes gives a nice supporting turn other major thing to appreciate carry off their parts easily a rock - solid job from both actors it 's a darn cool way to end the film the movie avoids growing stagnant i even liked the final scene decent , likable characters there are enough surprises and plot twists universally applicable a riveting little thriller as good hollywood entertainment manages to be engaging i also liked some of the supporting cast members strikes the perfect facial expression still performs admirably