"The Necessary Truth of Hierarchy

There is something deep within the human spirit that yearns not only to live, but to live rightly — to find meaning, to belong in an order that makes sense, and to feel that one’s place in that order is just. This is not a luxury of the fortunate; it is a fundamental part of what it means to flourish as a human being. A man may survive without much, but he cannot truly flourish unless he believes his life, his role, and his condition are just — that they are right, not merely by custom or accident, but by nature. This belief, if it is to be stable and sustaining, must rest on more than feeling; it must rest on truth — not contingent or relative truth, but necessary truth, the kind that would render its denial incoherent.

To see why this matters, we need only consider the basic structure of life itself. Everything in nature that endures or works well is part of some system: the body, the family, the ecosystem, the state. A system is not just a collection of things, but a unity — a set of parts working together toward an end. Such unity is impossible without order. If the body’s organs did not have distinct roles, arranged in the right way, we would die. If a language had no grammar, it would collapse into noise. If a society has no order, it cannot last.

Order, in turn, always implies some form of hierarchy. This does not mean tyranny or oppression, but structure — some directing principle, some way of coordinating parts that differ in function. Where there is order, there must be difference, and where there is difference, there must be roles of greater and lesser authority, responsibility, and visibility. This is not an invention of man; it is a law of systems. It is how anything greater than an individual survives and thrives.

Now, man is a strange and noble creature. He is not only part of systems, he reflects on them. He asks what is right, what is good, what is just. He does not live by instinct alone. Because of this, man must believe that the system he belongs to is not arbitrary, and that his place in it is not a punishment, but a rightful position. This belief cannot be manufactured indefinitely. If hierarchy is seen as imposed, changeable, or artificial — if it is viewed merely as the outcome of force or fortune — then resentment festers. The order no longer feels real; it feels rigged. And when people lose faith in the justice of their place, they begin to tear the order down.

But if people are to flourish within society — and not merely in rebellion against it — then they must understand hierarchy as something natural, something necessary. They must see that their role fits into a structure that is itself good and just because it reflects the truth of human nature.

And here lies a further truth: people are not the same. They differ in strength, intelligence, discipline, ambition, and desire. These differences are not defects; they are the raw material of a rich and functioning society. If all were leaders, who would follow? If all were thinkers, who would build? To pretend equality of capacity is to deny what everyone knows — that people are unequally suited to different tasks. Justice, properly understood, is not sameness but proportion: giving each person what is due to them according to their nature and contribution.

A just society, then, does not flatten these differences; it orders them. It allows excellence to lead, labor to sustain, and all roles to support the whole. It creates a harmony in which even those at the bottom can take pride in their contribution — if, and only if, they see that contribution as meaningful and just. That is why the perception of hierarchy as just must be more than a political strategy. It must be grounded in something enduring — in the idea that this order is not merely useful, but right; not merely effective, but necessary.

The alternative is chaos. History has shown what happens when people are taught that hierarchy is a lie. Revolutions erupt, structures collapse, and in the end, hierarchy returns — often more cruelly — because the need for order cannot be abolished, only ignored. The wise course, then, is not to deny hierarchy, but to understand it — to see it as the very form that justice and order take in human life. And when that understanding becomes common, society flourishes. So too does the man within it, who sees his place not as a sentence, but as a station — a rightful part in something greater than himself."

Discuss