Document ID: docfile:805fee60-1cd7-4fee-9048-893b3995cc3f
Source Database: eurlex_case_law
Source URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62015TA0509&qid=1741627609886&rid=65019
Title: Case T-509/15: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2017 — Kessel medintim v EUIPO — Janssen-Cilag (Premeno) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Premeno — Earlier national word mark Pramino — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Right to be heard — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2017-02-03T01:00:00.000+01:00
Metadata: {"title": "Case T-509/15: Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2017 \u2014 Kessel medintim v EUIPO \u2014 Janssen-Cilag (Premeno) (EU trade mark \u2014 Opposition proceedings \u2014 Application for the EU word mark Premeno \u2014 Earlier national word mark Pramino \u2014 Relative ground for refusal \u2014 Likelihood of confusion \u2014 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 \u2014 Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision \u2014 Right to be heard \u2014 Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)", "celex": "62015TA0509", "date_of_document": "2017-02-03T00:00:00.000Z", "ecli": "ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TA0509", "author": "General Court", "form": "Judicial information"}

#### 20.3.2017   

EN

#### Official Journal of the European Union

#### C 86/24

---

# Judgment of the General Court of 3 February 2017 — Kessel medintim v EUIPO — Janssen-Cilag (Premeno)

#### (Case T-509/15)(1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Premeno - Earlier national word mark Pramino - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Right to be heard - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 086/32)

Language of the case: German

## **Parties**

*Applicant: Kessel medintim GmbH (Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob and U. Staudenmaier, lawyers)*

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: M. Wenz, lawyer)

## **Re:**

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 July 2015 (Case R 349/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Janseen-Cilag and Kessel medintim.

## **Operative part of the judgment**

The Court:

    Dismisses the action;

    Orders Kessel medintim GmbH to pay the costs.

---

[^]: (1) OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.

---