Document ID: docfile:08f30c02-7af5-4601-b919-179027cdaf4a
Source Database: eurlex_case_law
Source URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62018TA0511&qid=1741626118867&rid=55166
Title: Case T-511/18: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — XH v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2017 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — Clarity and precision of a plea in law in the application — Rule requiring correspondence — Challenge of definitive acts — Admissibility — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Interim probation report — End-of-probation report — Appraisal report — Factors taken into account for the consideration of the comparative merits — Regularity of the procedure — Liability — Non-material damage)
Date: 2020-06-25T02:00:00.000+02:00
Metadata: {"title": "Case T-511/18: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 \u2014 XH v Commission (Civil service \u2014 Officials \u2014 Promotion \u2014 2017 promotion exercise \u2014 Decision not to promote \u2014 Clarity and precision of a plea in law in the application \u2014 Rule requiring correspondence \u2014 Challenge of definitive acts \u2014 Admissibility \u2014 Article 45 of the Staff Regulations \u2014 Interim probation report \u2014 End-of-probation report \u2014 Appraisal report \u2014 Factors taken into account for the consideration of the comparative merits \u2014 Regularity of the procedure \u2014 Liability \u2014 Non-material damage)", "celex": "62018TA0511", "date_of_document": "2020-06-25T00:00:00.000Z", "ecli": "ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0511", "author": "General Court", "form": "Judicial information"}

#### 17.8.2020   

EN

#### Official Journal of the European Union

#### C 271/33

---

# Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2020 — XH v Commission

(Case T-511/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2017 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - Clarity and precision of a plea in law in the application - Rule requiring correspondence - Challenge of definitive acts - Admissibility - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Interim probation report - End-of-probation report - Appraisal report - Factors taken into account for the consideration of the comparative merits - Regularity of the procedure - Liability - Non-material damage)

(2020/C 271/42)

Language of the case: English

## **Parties**

*Applicant: XH (represented by: E. Auleytner, lawyer)*

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

## **Re:**

Application under Article 270 TFEU, seeking (i) annulment of the decision, published in Administrative Notices No 25-2017 of 13 November 2017, not to include the applicant’s name in the list of officials promoted in the 2017 promotion exercise and annulment of Decision R/96/18 of 7 June 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 10 February 2018 and (ii) compensation for the damage allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.

## **Operative part of the judgment**

The Court:

    Annuls the decision not to promote XH to grade AD 6 in the 2017 promotion exercise, which is apparent from the publication, in Administrative Notices No 25-2017 of 13 November 2017, of the list of officials promoted to that grade;

    Orders the European Commission to pay to XH the sum of EUR 2 000 as compensation for the non-material damage that she has suffered;

    Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

    Orders the Commission to pay the costs.

---

[^]: Language of the case: English.

[^]: (1) OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.

---

[^]: ECLI:EU:C:2020:140

---