Document ID: docfile:47fddba7-7971-4d95-9c72-93be98e4c7a5
Source Database: eurlex_case_law
Source URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62015FB0020&qid=1741662215143&rid=69593
Title: Case F-20/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — FG v European Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Reform of the Staff Regulations — Regulation No 1023/2013 — Types of posts — Transitional rules on grading in the types of posts — Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Suitability for promotion to the grade above — Promotion year 2014 — Administrator without ‘particular responsibilities’ — Promotion possibilities capped at grade AD 12 — Name of that administrator not included in the list of promotable officials in grade AD 12 — Possibility of requesting to benefit under Article 30(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Deadline of 31 December 2015 — Admissibility of the action — Concept of measure adversely affecting a person — Amendment of the digital personal file of the official — Administrative information — Published on the institution’s intranet — Failure to satisfy the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)
Date: 2015-07-16T02:00:00.000+02:00
Metadata: {"title": "Case F-20/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 \u2014 FG v European Commission (Civil Service \u2014 Officials \u2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations \u2014 Regulation No 1023/2013 \u2014 Types of posts \u2014 Transitional rules on grading in the types of posts \u2014 Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations \u2014 Suitability for promotion to the grade above \u2014 Promotion year 2014 \u2014 Administrator without \u2018particular responsibilities\u2019 \u2014 Promotion possibilities capped at grade AD 12 \u2014 Name of that administrator not included in the list of promotable officials in grade AD 12 \u2014 Possibility of requesting to benefit under Article 30(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations \u2014 Deadline of 31 December 2015 \u2014 Admissibility of the action \u2014 Concept of measure adversely affecting a person \u2014 Amendment of the digital personal file of the official \u2014 Administrative information \u2014 Published on the institution\u2019s intranet \u2014 Failure to satisfy the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure \u2014 Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)", "celex": "62015FB0020", "date_of_document": "2015-07-16T00:00:00.000Z", "ecli": "ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FB0020", "author": "Civil Service Tribunal", "form": "Judicial information"}

#### 24.8.2015   

EN

#### Official Journal of the European Union

#### C 279/53

---

# Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — FG v European Commission

(Case F-20/15) (*)

((Civil Service - Officials - Reform of the Staff Regulations - Regulation No 1023/2013 - Types of posts - Transitional rules on grading in the types of posts - Article 30(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Suitability for promotion to the grade above - Promotion year 2014 - Administrator without ‘particular responsibilities’ - Promotion possibilities capped at grade AD 12 - Name of that administrator not included in the list of promotable officials in grade AD 12 - Possibility of requesting to benefit under Article 30(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Deadline of 31 December 2015 - Admissibility of the action - Concept of measure adversely affecting a person - Amendment of the digital personal file of the official - Administrative information - Published on the institution’s intranet - Failure to satisfy the requirements of the pre-litigation procedure - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2015/C 279/67)

Language of the case: French

## **Parties**

*Applicant: FG (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)*

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T.S. Bohr and E. Ehrbar, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

## **Re:**

Application for annulment of the decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials proposed for promotion to grade AD 13 in promotion year 2014.

## **Operative part of the order**

    The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

    Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

[^]: (*) Language of the case: French.

[^]: OJ C 127, 20.4.2015, p. 41.

---