Document ID: docfile:b5365210-50b3-4e4f-8e8a-59b5a0246f57
Source Database: eurlex_case_law
Source URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=CELEX:62024TN0590&qid=1741749950880&rid=42170
Title: Case T-590/24: Action brought on 18 November 2024 – Yanukovych v Council
Date: 2024-01-01T01:00:00.000+01:00
Metadata: {"title": "Case T-590/24: Action brought on 18 November 2024 \u2013 Yanukovych v Council", "celex": "62024TN0590", "date_of_document": "2024-01-01T00:00:00.000Z", "ecli": "ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0590", "author": "General Court"}

# Official Journal of the European Union

# EN

# C series

---

#### C/2025/198

#### 13.1.2025

## **Action brought on 18 November 2024 – Yanukovych v Council**

#### *(Case T-590/24)*

(C/2025/198)

Language of the case: English

## **Parties**

*Applicant: Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych (Saint Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: B. Kennelly, Solicitor)*

Defendant: Council of the European Union

## **Form of order sought**

The applicant claims that the Court should:

    annul, insofar as it applies to the applicant, Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; (1)

    annul, insofar as it applies to the applicant, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine; (2)

    order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.

## **Pleas in law and main arguments**

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Council made manifest errors of assessment in determining that the designation criterion had been satisfied. In particular, the applicant alleges that the Council accepted at face value, without any attempted verification whatsoever, unsubstantiated and largely historic assertions, allegations and even opinions from various media reports of questionable reliability. The Council presented these claims and accusations as fact, despite the many inaccuracies and inconsistencies identified by the applicant in his observations. By designating the applicant on the basis of past acts which have exhausted their effects at the time when they were carried out and/or in any event long before September 2024, the Council has impermissibly and unlawfully frozen the applicant’s situation in the past and deprived the required periodic review of all practical effects.

---

[^(1)]: Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2456 of 12 September 2024 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/2456).

[^(2)]: Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2455 of 12 September 2024 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ L, 2024/2455).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/198/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

---