# Wideband Crescent-Shaped Slotted Printed Antenna with Radiant Circular Polarisation

Authors: Akrem Asmeida; Zuhairiah Zainal Abidin; Shaharil Mohd Shah; Muhammad Ramlee Kamarudin; Norun Abdul Malek; Jamel Nebhen
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Producing a suitable impedance matching between the radiating element and the feedline is the prior hurdle to overcome for a wideband antenna with circular polarisation designs. This study presents a novel antenna consisting of a defected ground structure (DGS) and a crescent-slot radiating patch for broad impedance bandwidth. In addition, a narrow rectangular slot was etched on the ground plane for antenna compactness and outcomes improvement. In order to examine the reliability, two different numerical softwares were compared based on the antenna’s basic structure. Apart from this, an equivalent circuit of the proposed prototype is modelled logically using ADS 2016. The numerical results demonstrate that the impedance bandwidth was about 74.6% for < −10 dB, while the 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth greater than 53% was achieved. In the operational bandwidth of the design, good impedance matching and high efficiency were seen, which shows that this design is appropriate for modern wireless communication systems in ISM and GSM bands.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Circular polarisation (CP) is well known due to its attractive attributes in particular wideband antenna designs. Contrary to linear polarisation, the antenna with CP allows signals to be received from all orientation and mitigates multipath losses [1]. Nonetheless, to upgrade the antenna’s operational structure and ensure that optimum performance is achieved, numerous research works have been carried out using various recommended methods associated to CP features, which also improved the antenna’s bandwidth. For instance, to achieve CP radiation, a symmetrical ground was used to design a wideband printed circular ring antenna [1]. Other than that, an open loop radiator fed with CPW [2], circular-tapered fed sleeve [3], and C-shape radiator [4] were also used. Most of these methods did not account much for higher order modes elimination. This may lead to band separation at targeted bandwidth range. Therefore, when there is no CP in the same targeted band [5], multiresonant modes pertaining to the loaded slot patch antenna were initiated. In addition, the work in [6] utilised a grounded dielectric‐ferrite substrate prototype to provide a 3 dB axial ratio bandwidth higher than 64% in the X-band.In the aspect of reconfigurable antennas, switching ability from multiband to wideband mode has been performed and demonstrated in [7]. Another design included two symmetrical slots that were fed with the help of a fork-shaped microstrip line; once reconfigured, a broadband range was obtained [8]. Unavoidably, this could result in undesired resonant frequencies where harmonics are generated due to the nonlinearity of PIN diode. A preventive measure to avoid the latter would be for the antennas to be properly tuned at a particular band as shown in [9, 10]. High fabrication cost is also associated with the antennas, and a way out for a more cost-effective approach is mentioned in [11].In early 1990s, a defected ground structure (DGS) technique was introduced. The DGS was employed to enhance the performance of a wideband magnetoelectric dipole such as stable high gain, bandwidth of reflection coefficient, and low cross polarisation [12]. In addition, it was adapted to suppress the higher harmonics, reduce cross-polarisation, and enhance the radiation pattern [13, 14]. In [15], it has been demonstrated that DGS has a positive association with a band notch filter as it rejected the undesirable higher or lower frequency mode of the resonator.In this study, we have designed a compact slot antenna with a conventional microstrip feed. The geometry of the slot is caused by the combination of a ring resonator and circular shifted patch which in turn can generate circular polarisation behaviour. An impedance bandwidth of 74.6% (from 1.46 to 3.2 GHz), centred at 2.1 GHz, was attained along with a 53.6% CP bandwidth. For the avoidance of any unwanted higher order resonant frequencies, a band-notched rectangular slot is introduced. Moreover, the equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna has been designed, and its lumped components have been studied for a substantial understanding of the antenna’s behaviour. Last but not least, a table of comparison showing the differences between the proposed works with the previously reported work has also been presented.


## 2. Antenna Design and Configuration

Figure1 shows the steps involved in designing the antenna from the initial design until the final design of the crescent-slot patch antenna. In the initial design, a circular patch is introduced on top of the ring resonator. The centre of the circular patch is positioned 12 mm above the ring resonator midpoint. The tangent in the lower part of the circular patch is 4 mm away from the top edge of the feedline (Figure 1(a)). It is then shifted by Δp = 8 mm to the right to generate the CP as shown in Figure 1(b). Next, to improve the bandwidth and the impedance matching, a crescent antenna slot (CAS) is created by shifting the inner radius of the ring resonator downwards towards the feedline Δr3=1mm (Figure 1(c)).Figure 1
Design stages of the proposed antenna. (a) Integration of ring and circular radiators. (b) Shifted circular patch. (c) Shifted inner radius of ring patch. (d) Final formation of a slotted crescent shape patch antenna.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The area of this crescent slot is calculated by using the following formula:(1)As=πr322+r3r12−r32−r12sin−1r3r1,where As is the area of crescent slot, r1 is the radius of the circular patch, and r3 is the inner radius of the ring resonator.Figure2 shows the final geometry of the crescent-slot monopole antenna design. The truncated ground slot occupies approximately the half of the DGS with a length, LDGS of 35.9 mm. The rectangular slot (Ws × Ls) with dimension 10 mm × 26 mm is employed on the ground plane to regulate the response of both the reflection coefficient and 3 dB AR at the suggested frequency band simultaneously.Figure 2
Geometry of the crescent-slot patch antenna: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.
(a)(b)The proposed design is fabricated on a 1.575 mm thickness of Rogers RT/Duroid® 5880 substrate with a loss tangent tanδ of 0.0009 and dielectric constant εr of 2.2. The circular patch radius r1 is 15 mm, while the width Wf and length Lf of the 50 Ω microstrip feedline were 3 mm and 35 mm, respectively. The ring outer and inner radius r2 and r3 are 8 mm and 6.2 mm in the given order. The total size of the final design is 55×70mm2 (0.33λ0×0.42λ0 at 1.8 GHz).Figure3 shows the comparison of four reflection coefficients of the crescent slot antenna. As shown in Figure 1(a), when the ring resonator’s inner radius had a central position (without shifting), the reflection coefficient had a lower value at high frequency than the lower frequencies.Figure 3
The effect of simulated reflection coefficients under inner ring radius shifting.The responses were produced by shifting downwards the inner radiusΔr3 by 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm as shown in Figure 1(c). It is demonstrated that the shift of Δr3 = 1 mm approximately produced the lowest value of the loss coefficient numbers being −23.32 dBm and −16.72 dBm at the frequencies of 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz, respectively. As expected, a slight shift ∆r3 = 1 mm produced a lower loss coefficient. It can be said that the effect of the shifting could be proportionally inverted to the coefficient number. Contrarily, the highest shifting of the inner radius yielded the most significant loss coefficient. Moreover, the simulation showed that the shifted value of ∆r3 = 1 mm had provided an almost optimal result compared to the other values at similar resonance frequencies. Based on this simulation, it also should be noted that the shifting has yielded no significant difference in the reflection coefficients at a higher frequency level (frequency > 2.8 GHz). It means that the ring shifting produced identical impacts at a higher frequency level, making it ineffective.The effect on the reflection coefficient bandwidth with respect to the existence of a rectangular slot (DGS) is shown in Figure4. Eventhough it reduces the overall partial ground plane size, in common effect with the previous Δr3 parameter, DGS had the ability to further improve the values of the return loss over both respective operating frequencies. Indeed, this enhancement achieved an increase of more than 20% when the shifting of the inner radius ring parameter Δr3 was included.Figure 4
The influence of DGS on the reflection coefficients.The axial ratio from different variables of shift movement (∆p = 2, 4, 6, 8 mm) influenced the frequency of GSM and ISM bands, as it is shown in Figure 5. The main focus in this contribution was to attain <3 dB of an axial ratio value between the frequency range of 1.7 and 2.9 GHz. Also, the shift movement shown in Figure 1(b) was inversely proportional to the axial ratio. The highest variable produces the smallest ratio at the observed frequency range.Figure 5
The effect of the axial ratio by shifting ∆p.On the other hand, the variable ∆p = 2 mm, outlined by the pink line, fluctuated along with the frequency range. It revealed that the lower shift movement variable is not suitable for the axial ratio. The shift of ∆p = 8 mm produced the best axial ratio because it had to have the uppermost resonance frequency to be maintained at the same phase response.Figure6 shows the electrical current concentration of the proposed antenna at both resonance frequencies along the y-axis.Figure 6
Current distribution at (a) 1.8 GHz and (b) 2.4 GHz.
(a)(b)It is apparent from both images in Figures6(a) and 6(b) that the optimum current concentrated at the top and around the edges of the circular patch itself and around the edges of the crescent slot and on the feedline at both frequencies.A high current concentration can most notably be seen at the bottom edge of the crescent slot at 2.4 GHz. This validates the presence of crescent slot which accumulates EM power to develop high inductance at the top and around the edges of the antenna’s radiator over frequency swept. Notably, the dense current at a higher resonant frequency shows that the crescent slot gives more impact than the lower resonant frequency.Figure7 presents the current distribution and circulation direction of the proposed prototype within the interval of two-phase angles.Figure 7
Current circulation vector at 1.8 GHz: (a) 0°, (b) 180° and at 2.4 GHz: (c) 0°, (d) 180°.
(a)(b)(c)(d)From the figure, the current vector at 1.8 GHz is rotated clockwise at an interval phase of 0°, while it is rotated anticlockwise at an interval phase of 180°. A similar trait is also observed at 2.4 GHz. It is essential to mention that shifting the circular patch’s location to the right is the primary precursor of current directional rotation to generate circular polarisation. As long as the rotation has occurred, the right-hand and left-hand polarisation can be determined from the radiation patterns in the following subsection. The simulations were performed using two different software packages, namely, ANSYS HFSS electromagnetic simulator and CST Microwave Studio®. These two softwares are used to justify the accuracy and solve complexity.The simulation in ANSYS HFSS was performed in the frequency domain by employing the finite element method (FEM), while simulation in CST MWS was uniformly performed in the frequency domain with the finite integration technique (FIT). The two methods yielded precise reflection coefficients in which the antenna’s impedance bandwidth was more than 1.5 GHz with a ratio of 66%. Ultimately, the entire shape is fabricated and represented in Figure8 based on the leading simulation results validation.Figure 8
Fabricated antenna prototype: (a) top view and (b) bottom view.
(a)(b)


## 3. Design Performance Analysis

The antenna’s reflection coefficient was measured by using the Keysight’s E5071C ENA vector network analyser, and the far-field measurement was conducted in an anechoic chamber with its signal generator and spectrum analyser setup, as shown in Figure9.Figure 9
Measurement setup of (a) reflection coefficient and (b), (c) radiation pattern.
(a)(b)(c)Figure10 shows the gain measurement setup using the E8267D PSG signal generator and MAXN 9020A spectrum analyser. The proposed receiving antenna is connected to the spectrum analyser, while the transmitted horn antenna is attached to the signal generator with a transmitted power of 0 dB. The boresight gain of the patch antenna is obtained from the far-field region measurement in line with the standard circularly polarized gain antenna.Figure 10
Boresight gain measurement setup.In Figure11, the measured reflection coefficient, S11 of the fabricated antenna has been compared with the ANSYS HFSS and CST MWS® software’s simulated results. The comparison displays a uniform discrepancy throughout the whole frequency range due to different numerical methods applied by the software packages.Figure 11
Reflection coefficient S11 of the proposed antenna.However, the measured reflection coefficient is promising as it covers a frequency bandwidth of 1.74 GHz (1.46–3.2 GHz) for S11 < −10 dB. The expected slight variation in the reflection coefficient is due to the variation of quality in the actual material properties, the measurement losses, and the fabrication process’s tolerances.For more substantial understanding, an equivalent circuit was designed by using the ADS Software. Figure12 shows the R-L-C circuit of the proposed antenna. The input impedance of 50 Ω is to be kept the same as the input port and the microstrip feedline. The slot is composed of a T-type of L-C-L circuit with two serial inductors and one parallel capacitor.Figure 12
ADS equivalent circuit of the proposed antenna.The tuning process is carried out to obtain the best symmetry of the simulated equivalent circuit with the measured S11. Manually tuning the bandwidth by varying the capacitor,C3 (0.517 pF) and the inductors L3 (2.56 nH) and L4 (2.92 nH) allow for a desired identical reflection coefficient which in turn produces resonant frequencies at 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz, which are the uppermost operating frequencies of GSM and ISM bands.The characteristic responses between the measured antenna and simulated ADS equivalent circuit are shown in Figure13. In this figure, similar behaviour is seen in both the measured antenna and the simulated equivalent circuit, thus confirming that the latter can work in the same frequency range as the proposed antenna.Figure 13
Comparison between the measured reflection coefficient of the proposed antenna and the simulated reflection coefficient of the ADS equivalent circuit.To comply with the circular polarisation requirement, the beam width of the antenna must be < 3 dB. Figure14 shows the boresight axial ratio of the antenna over its frequency band.Figure 14
Axial ratio over frequency range between ANSYS HFSS and CST MWS® software.From the figure, the bandwidth that cover circular polarisation based on ANSYS HFSS and CST MWS® software is 1.1938 GHz (from 1.6283 to 2.8221 GHz) and 1.2025 GHz (from 1.7753 to 2.9778 GHz), respectively, which fulfils the GSM and ISM frequency band requirement.The measured boresight gain of the antenna over frequency band has been compared with the simulated boresight gain in ANSYS HFSS and CST MWS® software as shown in Figure15. From this figure, a difference of approximately 0.5 dB can be seen between the measured gain and the simulated CST gain at the required ISM band of 2.4 GHz. Besides, it is also shown that at 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz, the measured boresight gain are 3.25 dB and 3.6 dB, respectively, compared to 3.25 dB and 4 dB in CST MWS® software simulation. Typically, the measured gain is usually less than 0.5 dB, lower than the simulated gain due to material properties’ effects, experimental setup losses from the measurement outside the anechoic chamber, and manufacturing tolerance losses.Figure 15
Comparison between the measured boresight gain of the proposed antenna with the simulated boresight gain on over frequency.Figure16 shows the radiation patterns of right-hand circular polarisation (RHCP) and left-hand circular polarisation (LHCP) measured at 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz and its comparisons with the simulated radiation patterns. The simulated radiation patterns and the measured results are normalised to 0 dB. From Figure 16(a), it can be seen that the simulated radiation patterns of LHCP at 1.8 GHz are at −10 dB and the measured pattern is at −15 dB, whereas at 2.4 GHz, the simulated patterns are at −10 to −12.5 dB while the measured pattern is at −22 dB. Figure 16(b) shows that the measured radiation pattern of RHCP at 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz is at −12 dB and −20 dB, respectively. The simulated far-field radiation patterns are perfectly conformed with the axial ratio plot in Figure 14. In the case of measured results, the boresight gain in Figure 16 provides the actual comparison of RHCP results which complies with the simulated results. The discrepancies in LHCP results may be attributed to the asymmetric manufactured structure around the radiating patch and metal inside the clamping mechanism.Figure 16
Radiation patterns at 1.8 GHz and 2.4 GHz of (a) RHCP and (b) LHCP.
(a)(b)The major achievements of this study are the involvement of an uncomplicated and novel wideband antenna while maintaining CP characteristics and band range satisfaction. Therefore, to validate the proposed antenna in this work, Table1 compares the proposed antenna with the previous work published between 2014 and 2018. From the table, it is evident that the operational bandwidth in references [16–18] only covers either GSM or ISM bands. The antenna in [5] has a linear polarisation with a complex structure. Furthermore, despite having an operational wideband range for its targeted band, the geometry of the designs in [19, 20] is complicated due to an additional stub and parasitic strip, respectively. On the other hand, the proposed antenna in this study has shown simple structure, a broad operational frequencies, and AR bandwidth. These merits, thus, provide a promising solution especially for an individual user under a specified band in a crowded ecosystem where interference may occur.Table 1
Comparison of the proposed antenna with previous studies.
ReferenceDimension (mm3)Design simplicityOperational frequency (GHz)AR bandwidth (GHz)[5]96 × 64.2 × 11.5Complex1.62–2.78NA[13]50 × 50 × 1.6Simple1.84–2.430.54[16]46.6 × 70 × 0.8Simple2.08–3.751.48[17]80 × 80 × 4.572Simple0.88–0.930.1[18]30 × 30 × 1Complex2.22–2.590.09[19]25 × 25 × 1Complex4.26–10.924.14[20]32 × 30 × 1.6Complex3.92–7.523.16This work70 × 55 × 1.57Simple1.46–3.21.12


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study proposed a simple wideband monopole antenna whose simulation was validated by fabrication and measurement. The AR bandwidth was found to achieve more than the proposed frequency band of 53.6% (from 1.5 to 2.5 GHz) by shifting the circular radiator to a specific location. The combination of a crescent slot with the radiator and a rectangular slot of DGS on the ground plane has not only yielded a considerable enhancement on the 53.6% bandwidth feature pertaining to a monopole antenna but also demonstrated to preserve the polarity bandwidth. Slight discrepancies were seen on the reflection coefficient at the higher frequency response of the equivalent circuit attributed to the parasitic elements in the substrate. It was also shown that the measured agreed with the simulated results.



---

*Source: 9975679-2021-07-31.xml*