# Fabrication and Super-Antibacterial Property of Nanosilver/Sericin/Poly(ethylene oxide) Nanofibers through Electrospinning-Combined Postdeposition Method

Authors: Jia Li; Bo-Xiang Wang; Yi-Fan Cui; Zhi-Cai Yu; Xu Hao; Feng-Yuan Huang; De-Hong Cheng; Yan-Hua Lu
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Nanosilver particle has been used in the nanofiber mats by mixing the nanosilver with the spinning solution for improving the antibacterial property. Although studies have shown that the antibacterial property of nanofiber mats gets increasing, the higher silver content and the larger released resistance of nanosilver from nanofiber mats are obvious. Here, the electrospinning-combined postdeposition method was used to prepare the nanosilver/sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) (Ag/SS/PEO) nanofiber mats and the bacterial reduction rates againstStaphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) andEscherichia coli (E. coli) were analyzed. We found that the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats were excellent antibacterial properties at the lower silver content and the bacterial reduction rates againstS. aureus andE. coli all reached above 99.99%. Our data suggests that the antibacterial property can be improved by introducing the electrospinning-combined postdeposition method.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nanosilver with the lower toxicity and the longer antibiotics time is a typical nanoantibiotic material in antibacterial agents [1, 2]. At present, there is no efficient usage of nanosilver for nanofiber mats, especially for sericin nanofiber mats. Mixing the nanosilver with the polymer solution prior to electrospinning is a general technique for nanofiber mats, as many studies have demonstrated favorable results in various nanofiber mats [3–6].Sericin (SS) has been used in a variety of biomedical applications such as wound dressing and tissue engineering, due to the larger hygroscopicity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and other properties [7, 8]. Several early phase studies involving sericin nanofiber mats with nanosilver are now underway with promising outcomes [9]. However, the resulting nanofiber mats by the general techniques still have some problems as biomedical materials. Among the major hurdles for biological application, it needs enough higher silver content in order to achieve strong antibacterial properties. The literature has reported that the smaller Ag (20 nm), regardless of coating, are toxic in cell types [10]. The more the nanosilver, the more toxic the resulting products. An additional concern with this polymer for improving sericin nanofiber forming property is that it has good biodegradability, biocompatibility, and spinnability. It has been proved that the nanofiber forming property can be greatly improved by adding PEO [11–13]. This literature has reported that the keratin spinnability by adding the PEO is improved [14].In this study, we aim to explore whether electrospinning-combined postdeposition method is able to fabricate the nanosilver/sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) nanofiber mats and whether the new approach can improve the antibacterial property and obtain the super-antibacterial property nanofiber mats at the lower silver content.


## 2. Experiment and Methods

### 2.1. Materials

Sericin (M
v
=
90 kDa, Shanghai, China) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, M
v
=
60 kDa, Shanghai, China) were used without further purification. Sodium hydroxide and sodium hypophosphite monohydrate were purchased from Tianjin Heng Xing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Citric acid and silver nitrate (kept away from light) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).S. aureus (ATCC 6538) andE. coli (ATCC 8099) were offered from Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Zhangjiagang (Jiangsu, China).


### 2.2. Preparation of Nanofiber Mats

In order to research the influence of nanosilver location for nanosilver effective utilization based on nanofiber mats, the nanosilver-sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) (Ag-SS/PEO) nanofiber mats and the nanosilver/sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) (Ag/SS/PEO) nanofiber mats were separately prepared by precursor silver-loaded and electrospinning-combined postdeposition method.The precursor silver-loaded meant that Ag-SS solution was obtained by adding dropwise silver nitrate ethanol solution into sericin solution with vigorously stirring at 60°C for 1 h firstly. And then the Ag-SS solution was blended with the prepared PEO solution with stirring at room temperature. The resulting Ag-SS/PEO solutions, whose ratio was maintained at 70/30 (v/v), were electrospun to obtain Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats. The electrospinning-combined postdeposition method referred to the prepared Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats that were developed by SS/PEO nanofiber mats being electrospun SS/PEO solutions and then immersed in silver nitrate ethanol solution kept away from light at room temperature for 15 min. The process parameters of electrospinning were as follows: 30 kV (voltage), 15 cm (distance between tip and receptor), 1.0 mm/s (feed rate of the syringe pump), 60% (humidity), and 25°C (temperature).The specific scheme and preparation process parameters of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats were shown in Figure1 and Table 1, separately.Table 1
Preparation process parameters of nanofiber mats.
SS/mL
PEO/mL
Citric acid/g
NaH2PO2⋅H2O/g
NaOH/g
AgNO3/%
Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.005
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.01
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.02
Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.005
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.01
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.02Figure 1
Scheme process of prepared nanofiber mats with nanosilver.


### 2.3. Characterization

The morphologies of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, TM-1000, Hitachi, Japan). The properties of the secondary structure and degree of crystallinity of sericin were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Tensor-37, Bruker, Germany) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8-Gadds, Bruker Axs, United States). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, ThermoFisher, United States) and the Zetasizer Nano ZS particle size analyzer (ZEN 3500, Malvern, United Kingdom) were used to assess the characterization of the nanosilver particle size.


### 2.4. Antibacterial Testing

The antimicrobial activity of the nanofiber mats was tested againstS. aureus andE. coli by using a shake-flask method according to the literature. The nanofiber mats (0.75 ± 0.07 g), being cut into small pieces with size of around 0.5 × 0.5 cm2, were placed separately in the bacterial suspension ofS. aureus andE. coli. and then dipped into a flask containing 70 mL of 0.3 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, monopotassium phosphate, pH ≈ 7.2) culture solution with cell concentration of 1 × 105–4 × 105 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL. The flask was then shaken at 150 rpm on a rotary shaker at 24°C for 1 h. From each incubated sample, 0.5 mL of culture solution before and after being shaken 1 h was taken, diluted, and distributed onto an agar plate. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the colonies formed were counted. The inhibitory rate (%) was determined as follows:(1)
R
=
A
-
B
A
×
100
%
,where R was the percentage of bacterial reduction and A and B were the bacterial colonies before and after being shaken 24 h, respectively.


## 2.1. Materials

Sericin (M
v
=
90 kDa, Shanghai, China) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO, M
v
=
60 kDa, Shanghai, China) were used without further purification. Sodium hydroxide and sodium hypophosphite monohydrate were purchased from Tianjin Heng Xing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Citric acid and silver nitrate (kept away from light) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).S. aureus (ATCC 6538) andE. coli (ATCC 8099) were offered from Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Zhangjiagang (Jiangsu, China).


## 2.2. Preparation of Nanofiber Mats

In order to research the influence of nanosilver location for nanosilver effective utilization based on nanofiber mats, the nanosilver-sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) (Ag-SS/PEO) nanofiber mats and the nanosilver/sericin/poly(ethylene oxide) (Ag/SS/PEO) nanofiber mats were separately prepared by precursor silver-loaded and electrospinning-combined postdeposition method.The precursor silver-loaded meant that Ag-SS solution was obtained by adding dropwise silver nitrate ethanol solution into sericin solution with vigorously stirring at 60°C for 1 h firstly. And then the Ag-SS solution was blended with the prepared PEO solution with stirring at room temperature. The resulting Ag-SS/PEO solutions, whose ratio was maintained at 70/30 (v/v), were electrospun to obtain Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats. The electrospinning-combined postdeposition method referred to the prepared Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats that were developed by SS/PEO nanofiber mats being electrospun SS/PEO solutions and then immersed in silver nitrate ethanol solution kept away from light at room temperature for 15 min. The process parameters of electrospinning were as follows: 30 kV (voltage), 15 cm (distance between tip and receptor), 1.0 mm/s (feed rate of the syringe pump), 60% (humidity), and 25°C (temperature).The specific scheme and preparation process parameters of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats were shown in Figure1 and Table 1, separately.Table 1
Preparation process parameters of nanofiber mats.
SS/mL
PEO/mL
Citric acid/g
NaH2PO2⋅H2O/g
NaOH/g
AgNO3/%
Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.005
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.01
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.02
Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.005
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.01
2.1
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.02Figure 1
Scheme process of prepared nanofiber mats with nanosilver.


## 2.3. Characterization

The morphologies of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, TM-1000, Hitachi, Japan). The properties of the secondary structure and degree of crystallinity of sericin were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Tensor-37, Bruker, Germany) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8-Gadds, Bruker Axs, United States). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha, ThermoFisher, United States) and the Zetasizer Nano ZS particle size analyzer (ZEN 3500, Malvern, United Kingdom) were used to assess the characterization of the nanosilver particle size.


## 2.4. Antibacterial Testing

The antimicrobial activity of the nanofiber mats was tested againstS. aureus andE. coli by using a shake-flask method according to the literature. The nanofiber mats (0.75 ± 0.07 g), being cut into small pieces with size of around 0.5 × 0.5 cm2, were placed separately in the bacterial suspension ofS. aureus andE. coli. and then dipped into a flask containing 70 mL of 0.3 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, monopotassium phosphate, pH ≈ 7.2) culture solution with cell concentration of 1 × 105–4 × 105 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL. The flask was then shaken at 150 rpm on a rotary shaker at 24°C for 1 h. From each incubated sample, 0.5 mL of culture solution before and after being shaken 1 h was taken, diluted, and distributed onto an agar plate. All plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h, and the colonies formed were counted. The inhibitory rate (%) was determined as follows:(1)
R
=
A
-
B
A
×
100
%
,where R was the percentage of bacterial reduction and A and B were the bacterial colonies before and after being shaken 24 h, respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. FT-IR Spectrum of Nanofiber Mats

Fourier transform infrared spectrometer of the sericin powders, the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, and the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats (Figure2) shows that the characteristic absorption bands being appropriate to characterize the structural conformation of sericin are assigned mainly to the peptide bonds in the region named amide I (1600~1700 cm−1), amide II (1480~1580 cm−1), and amide III (1220~1230 cm−1) peaks [15–17].Figure 2
The FT-IR spectra of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.Figure3 presents the FT-IR spectra in the range from 600 cm−1 to 1800 cm−1, which reflects comprehensively the primary hydroxyl (-C-OH) and the primary amino (-C-NH2) groups of sericin. The primary hydroxyl (-C-OH) of sericin is especially sensitive to the structure of the proteins and this band is broken by the reaction between sericin and silver nitrate solution [18]. The primary amino (-C-NH2) is disturbed by the transmission peak generated of Ag°. As a result, the -C-OH and -C-NH2 band are all appropriate to characterize the structural conformation of sericin in the blend nanofiber mats.Figure 3
Spectra (600~1800 cm−1) of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.The peak related to the -C-OH band stretching vibration at 1081 cm−1 is not shown in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, indicating that the primary hydroxyl reacted during the oxidation-reduction reaction between the primary hydroxy of sericin and Ag+ of silver nitrate solution. It is shown that the strong absorption peak at 1715 cm−1 appeared in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, suggesting that there is small amount of C=O stretching vibration which occurred during the oxidation-reduction reaction between sericin and silver nitrate.


### 3.2. The XRD Spectrum of Nanofiber Mats

XRD was used to examine the crystalline structure and crystallinity of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the measurements were conducted on them (Figure4). It can be seen from Figure 4 that there is a new crystalline peak at 38.55° concerning the nanosilver (Ag) in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats [19], illustrating that the nanosilver particles are successfully produced by the reaction between -C-OH and Ag+. As a result, this is possible for preparing nanosilver loaded nanofiber mats regardless of the precursor and later silver-loaded method [20].Figure 4
The XRD spectra of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.


### 3.3. Morphology of Nanofiber Mats

The surface microcosmic morphology of the prepared Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats was evaluated by SEM (Figures5(a) and 5(b)).Figure 5
The morphology of nanofibers. (a) Ag/SS/PEO nanofibers; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.
(a)
(b)Compared with the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats, the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats possess the rough surface morphologies and have significant nanosilver particles attached to the surface (see Figure5). It illustrates that the nanosilver particles being prepared by later silver-loaded method are all located on the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats. Also, the larger nanosilver particle is formed by nanosilver accumulated with the increasing content of Ag° [21–23]. However, there are no obvious nanosilver particle on the surface of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats (Figure 5(b)). This is due to the centripetal force of nanosilver particles during the nanofiber stretching process of electrospinning; the nanosilver particles are almost kept in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.


### 3.4. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Nanofiber Mats

The XPS spectra analysis was applied to confirm the existence of element, based on binding energy of electrons. The XPS spectra analysis on the surface of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats is conducted to evaluate the structure between the nanofiber mats and nanosilver and the element component of nanofiber mats. The results XPS spectra of the nanofiber mats are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
The XPS spectra of nanofiber mats. (a) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.
(a)
(b)Figure6 shows that the binding energies of C 1s, N 1s, O 1s, and Ag 3d, respectively, correspond with 285.5 eV, 339.1 eV, 530.6 eV, and 368 eV [24, 25]. There is obvious Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats at 368 eV. However, at this binding energy, there is no Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats. It indicates that the silver nanoparticles are located on the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the results are kept well with their surface microcosmic morphology of the prepared Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats by SEM test.The elemental content on the surface of the nanofiber mats is determined based on the XPS spectra analysis in the samples and listed in Table2. It can be illustrated that the elemental composition of nanofiber mats includes C, N, O, and Ag. There is no other impurity element detected on the prepared nanofiber mats, which illustrates that the nanofiber mats have high purity and might be suitable for the application in medical dressing.Table 2
The elements content on the surface of nanofiber mats.
Samples
Surface element content/%
C
N
O
Ag
Ag-SS/PEO nanofibers
63.59
9.35
27.06
0
Ag/SS/PEO nanofibers
63.01
8.70
28.79
0.50The Ag 3d5/2,3/2 spectra from the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats are resolved in Gaussian-shaped bands shown in Figure 7. The two distinct features with peak positions located at 284.7 and 287.9 eV are separately associated with the binding energy of Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 [26]. This fully illustrates the existence of silver on the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats. In addition, the peak width of Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 is similar and the maximum binding energy differences between the Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 are lowered 6 eV.Figure 7
The Ag 3d5/2, 3/2 spectra from the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats.


### 3.5.In Situ Fabrication and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

Nanosilver was synthesized through a clean synthesis procedure using the sericin as reducing agent. The specific interactions between sericin and silver nitrate are shown in Figure8.Figure 8
The mechanism reaction of synthesis of AgNO3 with SS.The functional groups such as hydroxyl groups, amino groups, and carboxy group of sericin all have electron donor groups capable to reduce Ag+ to Ag° [27–29]. The nucleation of nanosilver particle is formed and grown by accumulating with Ag°. The nanosilver particle is finally obtained by reaching the balance between the Ag° content of nucleation surface and the reduction solutions. The nanoparticle size analyzer was used to the Ag-SS solution to test the nanosilver particle size at silver content of 0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.02%, separately. The nanosilver particle size distribution by number in the Ag-SS solution is shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Particle size distribution of number for nanosilver particle.It is shown that the nanosilver particle with different concentration silver nitrate ethanol solution is formed with the different diameters size. The nanosilver diameter in Ag-SS solution with the silver content at 0.005% has a major distribution of 1~10 nm. Increasing the silver content from 0.01% to 0.02%, the size distribution of silver particle reaches from 20 nm to 60 nm, respectively (Figure9). This can be due to the increases of silver nitrate concentration, and the balance between the Ag° content of nucleation surface and the reduction sericin solutions is hardly reached, resulting in the larger nanosilver particle size [30]. In conclusion, the size diameters of the different nanosilver contents are all about below 100 nm.


### 3.6. Antimicrobial Activity of Nanofiber Mats

The antibacterial efficiency of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats evaluated after the specific contact time and calculated by reduction percent ofE. coliandS. aureus was shown in Table 3. It is found that with the increasing of the silver content for nanofiber mats, the bacterial reduction rates of samples againstS. aureus andE. coli are increased gradually. When the silver content is about 0.005%, the bacterial reduction rates of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber matsS. aureus andE. coli have, respectively, reached 90.93 and 89.92%. However, at this same silver content, the bacterial reduction rates of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats againstS. aureus andE. coli only reach 65.03% and 50.79%. As a result, the later silver-loaded method improves materials antimicrobial property compared with the normal methods [31, 32] and makes the bacterial reduction rates of nanofiber mats againstS. aureus andE. coli reach about 99.99% with the silver content at 0.02%. The antimicrobial activity of nanofiber mats is increased greatly and this may be due to reducing the moving friction of nanosilvers and resulting in the improving of nanosilvers particles effective utilization.Table 3
Antibacterial activities of the nanofiber mats.
Silver nitrate content (%)
E. coli
S. aureus
Surviving cells (CFU/mL)
Reduction (%)
Surviving cells (CFU/mL)
Reduction (%)
Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats
0.005
8.04 × 105
65.03
0.50 × 105
50.79
0.01
4.24 × 105
70.11
1.12 × 105
61.45
0.02
2.24 × 105
85.25
5.20 × 104
80.97
Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats
0.005
1.04 × 104
90.93
1.20 × 104
89.92
0.01
4.04 × 103
95.97
1.20 × 103
95.96
0.02
<30
99.99
<30
99.99


## 3.1. FT-IR Spectrum of Nanofiber Mats

Fourier transform infrared spectrometer of the sericin powders, the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, and the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats (Figure2) shows that the characteristic absorption bands being appropriate to characterize the structural conformation of sericin are assigned mainly to the peptide bonds in the region named amide I (1600~1700 cm−1), amide II (1480~1580 cm−1), and amide III (1220~1230 cm−1) peaks [15–17].Figure 2
The FT-IR spectra of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.Figure3 presents the FT-IR spectra in the range from 600 cm−1 to 1800 cm−1, which reflects comprehensively the primary hydroxyl (-C-OH) and the primary amino (-C-NH2) groups of sericin. The primary hydroxyl (-C-OH) of sericin is especially sensitive to the structure of the proteins and this band is broken by the reaction between sericin and silver nitrate solution [18]. The primary amino (-C-NH2) is disturbed by the transmission peak generated of Ag°. As a result, the -C-OH and -C-NH2 band are all appropriate to characterize the structural conformation of sericin in the blend nanofiber mats.Figure 3
Spectra (600~1800 cm−1) of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.The peak related to the -C-OH band stretching vibration at 1081 cm−1 is not shown in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, indicating that the primary hydroxyl reacted during the oxidation-reduction reaction between the primary hydroxy of sericin and Ag+ of silver nitrate solution. It is shown that the strong absorption peak at 1715 cm−1 appeared in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats, suggesting that there is small amount of C=O stretching vibration which occurred during the oxidation-reduction reaction between sericin and silver nitrate.


## 3.2. The XRD Spectrum of Nanofiber Mats

XRD was used to examine the crystalline structure and crystallinity of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the measurements were conducted on them (Figure4). It can be seen from Figure 4 that there is a new crystalline peak at 38.55° concerning the nanosilver (Ag) in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats [19], illustrating that the nanosilver particles are successfully produced by the reaction between -C-OH and Ag+. As a result, this is possible for preparing nanosilver loaded nanofiber mats regardless of the precursor and later silver-loaded method [20].Figure 4
The XRD spectra of (a) PEO powders; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (c) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (d) SS powders.


## 3.3. Morphology of Nanofiber Mats

The surface microcosmic morphology of the prepared Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats was evaluated by SEM (Figures5(a) and 5(b)).Figure 5
The morphology of nanofibers. (a) Ag/SS/PEO nanofibers; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.
(a)
(b)Compared with the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats, the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats possess the rough surface morphologies and have significant nanosilver particles attached to the surface (see Figure5). It illustrates that the nanosilver particles being prepared by later silver-loaded method are all located on the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats. Also, the larger nanosilver particle is formed by nanosilver accumulated with the increasing content of Ag° [21–23]. However, there are no obvious nanosilver particle on the surface of the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats (Figure 5(b)). This is due to the centripetal force of nanosilver particles during the nanofiber stretching process of electrospinning; the nanosilver particles are almost kept in the Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.


## 3.4. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Nanofiber Mats

The XPS spectra analysis was applied to confirm the existence of element, based on binding energy of electrons. The XPS spectra analysis on the surface of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats is conducted to evaluate the structure between the nanofiber mats and nanosilver and the element component of nanofiber mats. The results XPS spectra of the nanofiber mats are shown in Figure6.Figure 6
The XPS spectra of nanofiber mats. (a) Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats; (b) Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats.
(a)
(b)Figure6 shows that the binding energies of C 1s, N 1s, O 1s, and Ag 3d, respectively, correspond with 285.5 eV, 339.1 eV, 530.6 eV, and 368 eV [24, 25]. There is obvious Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats at 368 eV. However, at this binding energy, there is no Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats. It indicates that the silver nanoparticles are located on the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats and the results are kept well with their surface microcosmic morphology of the prepared Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats by SEM test.The elemental content on the surface of the nanofiber mats is determined based on the XPS spectra analysis in the samples and listed in Table2. It can be illustrated that the elemental composition of nanofiber mats includes C, N, O, and Ag. There is no other impurity element detected on the prepared nanofiber mats, which illustrates that the nanofiber mats have high purity and might be suitable for the application in medical dressing.Table 2
The elements content on the surface of nanofiber mats.
Samples
Surface element content/%
C
N
O
Ag
Ag-SS/PEO nanofibers
63.59
9.35
27.06
0
Ag/SS/PEO nanofibers
63.01
8.70
28.79
0.50The Ag 3d5/2,3/2 spectra from the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats are resolved in Gaussian-shaped bands shown in Figure 7. The two distinct features with peak positions located at 284.7 and 287.9 eV are separately associated with the binding energy of Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 [26]. This fully illustrates the existence of silver on the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats. In addition, the peak width of Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 is similar and the maximum binding energy differences between the Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 are lowered 6 eV.Figure 7
The Ag 3d5/2, 3/2 spectra from the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats.


## 3.5.In Situ Fabrication and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles

Nanosilver was synthesized through a clean synthesis procedure using the sericin as reducing agent. The specific interactions between sericin and silver nitrate are shown in Figure8.Figure 8
The mechanism reaction of synthesis of AgNO3 with SS.The functional groups such as hydroxyl groups, amino groups, and carboxy group of sericin all have electron donor groups capable to reduce Ag+ to Ag° [27–29]. The nucleation of nanosilver particle is formed and grown by accumulating with Ag°. The nanosilver particle is finally obtained by reaching the balance between the Ag° content of nucleation surface and the reduction solutions. The nanoparticle size analyzer was used to the Ag-SS solution to test the nanosilver particle size at silver content of 0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.02%, separately. The nanosilver particle size distribution by number in the Ag-SS solution is shown in Figure 9.Figure 9
Particle size distribution of number for nanosilver particle.It is shown that the nanosilver particle with different concentration silver nitrate ethanol solution is formed with the different diameters size. The nanosilver diameter in Ag-SS solution with the silver content at 0.005% has a major distribution of 1~10 nm. Increasing the silver content from 0.01% to 0.02%, the size distribution of silver particle reaches from 20 nm to 60 nm, respectively (Figure9). This can be due to the increases of silver nitrate concentration, and the balance between the Ag° content of nucleation surface and the reduction sericin solutions is hardly reached, resulting in the larger nanosilver particle size [30]. In conclusion, the size diameters of the different nanosilver contents are all about below 100 nm.


## 3.6. Antimicrobial Activity of Nanofiber Mats

The antibacterial efficiency of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats and Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats evaluated after the specific contact time and calculated by reduction percent ofE. coliandS. aureus was shown in Table 3. It is found that with the increasing of the silver content for nanofiber mats, the bacterial reduction rates of samples againstS. aureus andE. coli are increased gradually. When the silver content is about 0.005%, the bacterial reduction rates of the Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber matsS. aureus andE. coli have, respectively, reached 90.93 and 89.92%. However, at this same silver content, the bacterial reduction rates of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats againstS. aureus andE. coli only reach 65.03% and 50.79%. As a result, the later silver-loaded method improves materials antimicrobial property compared with the normal methods [31, 32] and makes the bacterial reduction rates of nanofiber mats againstS. aureus andE. coli reach about 99.99% with the silver content at 0.02%. The antimicrobial activity of nanofiber mats is increased greatly and this may be due to reducing the moving friction of nanosilvers and resulting in the improving of nanosilvers particles effective utilization.Table 3
Antibacterial activities of the nanofiber mats.
Silver nitrate content (%)
E. coli
S. aureus
Surviving cells (CFU/mL)
Reduction (%)
Surviving cells (CFU/mL)
Reduction (%)
Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats
0.005
8.04 × 105
65.03
0.50 × 105
50.79
0.01
4.24 × 105
70.11
1.12 × 105
61.45
0.02
2.24 × 105
85.25
5.20 × 104
80.97
Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats
0.005
1.04 × 104
90.93
1.20 × 104
89.92
0.01
4.04 × 103
95.97
1.20 × 103
95.96
0.02
<30
99.99
<30
99.99


## 4. Conclusions

Our findings show that the deposition method of nanosilver is critical for the antibacterial property of nanofiber mats. Electrospinning-combined postdeposition method is able to fabricate the super-antibacterial Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats at the lower silver content and enhance the nanosilver utilization. The Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats have shown the extremely strong antibacterial properties and the bacterial reduction rates againstS. aureus andE. coli are all above 99.99% with the silver content at 0.02%. The bacterial reduction rates of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats by the general method againstS. aureus andE. coli only are 85.25% and 80.97% at the same silver content. This illustrates that the nanosilver particles effective utilization is improved when being attached to the outside of nanofiber mats by later silver-loaded method. The resulting nanosilver particle has a narrow particle size distribution, with average particle size of approximately 20 nm and the smallest nanosilver particle size is about 5 nm. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy also clearly reveals that there is obvious Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats at 368 eV. At this binding energy, there is no Ag 3d peak on the surface of Ag-SS/PEO nanofiber mats. This indicates that the silver nanoparticles are almost located outside the surface of Ag/SS/PEO nanofiber mats.



---

*Source: 9859530-2016-11-15.xml*