# Preparation, Characterization, and Evaluation of Rutin Nanocrystals as an Anticancer Agent against Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line

Authors: Sepideh Bohlouli; Faezeh Jafarmadar Gharehbagh; Elaheh Dalir Abdolahinia; Maryam Kouhsoltani; Ghasem Ebrahimi; Leila Roshangar; Amir Imani; Simin Sharifi; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj
Journal: Journal of Nanomaterials
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

The reports show that rutin has good potentials as an anticancer agent; however, rutin has poor bioavailability due to its low aqueous solubility. The present study was aimed at preparing and evaluating physicochemical properties as well as the anticancer activities of rutin nanocrystals (RNs). RNs were prepared via the ultrasonication method. The prepared nanocrystals then were physicochemically characterized by the conventional techniques. The cytotoxic effect of RNs and free rutin on the HN5 head and neck squamous carcinoma cell line was assessed. The HGF1-PI1 cells as normal oral cells were treated by RNs. Cells were also exposed to rutin and RNs to determine their effects on the expression ofcaspase-8, caspase-9, Bcl-2, and Bax genes. The prepared RNs have a mean particle size of 75±0.16 nm and quasispherical morphology. Rutin displayed no significant cytotoxic effect on HN5 cells to 2000 μM. However, RNs displayed a cytotoxic effect with IC50 of 30.51 μM and 27.34 μM in 24 and 48 h incubation times, respectively (p<0.05). RNs had cytotoxic effect 100 times more than rutin on HN5 cells. There was no significant cytotoxic effect on HGF1-PI1 treated by RNs in 24 and 48 h. The expression of Bcl-2 mRNA was significantly decreased in attendance of RNs compared to the control group (p<0.05). The increase in Bax/Bcl-2 ratio was revealed within IC50 of RNs in 24 h. Our results confirm that the anticancer effect of RNs is significantly more than that of rutin. The activation of the mitochondria-dependent apoptotic pathway of RNs occurred via modulation of Bcl-2 and Bax expression. These results suggest that RNs may be useful in the development of a cancer therapy protocol.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

One of the subgroups of oral and or pharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) is oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), which ranks the 11th most common carcinoma in humans. It accounts for 94% of oral cancers and 2-3% of all cancers. It is characterized by the low survival rate and poor prognosis. Despite current developments in the OSCC treatment in the past few decades, the survival rate of patients has only slightly increased; thus, based on these reasons, it is difficult to overcome OSCC [1–5].The importance and efficiency of herbs for the treatment of tumors have currently attracted considerable attention worldwide [6–10]. In this regard, flavonoids can be considered as ubiquitous compounds of herbs. These plants have attracted a lot of attention themselves since they have significant impacts on humans’ health; reports show their function against viruses, allergies, inflammation, and tumors, along with antiplatelet and antioxidant activities [11–13]. According to the studies, higher flavonoids and proanthocyanidin intake led to 44% and 40% lower risks for oral and laryngeal cancers, respectively. Moreover, a one-third reduction in the incidence of colon cancers was reported, along with reduced rates of breast and renal, as well as ovarian cancers. According to the above, flavonoids have anticancer potentials [14, 15].Figure1 shows rutin (quercetin rutinoside) as flavonoid quercetin glycoside. Researchers have found different advantages for rutin, such as inhibiting aggregation of platelet, anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and decreasing fat as well as cholesterol in the blood [16, 17]. According to a study, rutin was capable of exerting considerable and possible positive impacts on reducing precancerous complications along with triggering apoptotic conditions in cancers associated with the large intestine [18].Figure 1
The chemical structure of rutin.The science of nanotechnology is about synthesizing particles at nanoscale size ranging from 1 to 100 nm, leading to a significant surface increase (in terms of the area and atoms), as well as nanoparticles’ physical and chemical properties (being bioavailable and stable) compared to the native state [19]. Therefore, it is possible to apply this technology in various areas, including biomedicine and pharmaceutics. The nanoparticle form of phytochemicals is highly soluble and considerably efficient in cellular uptake while showing improved adsorption and requiring lower dosages. It can also target the desired tissues better and has great efficiency in treatment compared to the native state [13, 20–22].The aim of this study was the preparation of rutin nanoparticles (RNs) with a view to improving its anticancer effect compared with rutin on the HN5 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell line by revealing the mechanisms of the cytotoxic effect.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Preparation of Rutin Nanocrystals

RNs were prepared by the ultrasonication method and solvent evaporation with rotary. Briefly, rutin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was dissolved in ethanol (Merck, Germany) and hexane (Merck, Germany) was quickly added to it to achieve 50 mg/mL solution. The ethanol/hexane ratio was 25/75 by volume. The solution was then placed under ultrasonic conditions (AZ, Taiwan) with an ultrasonic source at a frequency of 50 kHz. Tween 80 (2% by weight) was used as a surfactant. The mixture was then mixed at 1000 rpm for 30 minutes. The resulting solution was placed on a rotary, and the solvent was evaporated. The resulting yellow powder was collected as rutin nanoparticles and stored at -20°C.


### 2.2. Characterization Evaluations

#### 2.2.1. Particle Size

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) technique (Malvern, United Kingdom) was applied for the determination of the particle size RNs at 25°C.


#### 2.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

An SEM instrument (SEM, TESCAN, Warrendale, PA) was utilized for observing the morphology of the prepared RNs. For this, the powder of the nanoparticles was placed on stubs and then coated with a gold layer.


#### 2.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

A FTIR instrument (Shimadzu 8400S, Japan) was used for detecting the FTIR spectra of the samples. The potassium bromide (IR grade) was mixed with the RNs and compressed. Besides, XRD of the samples was detected by an X-ray diffractometer (Philips TW 1710 diffractometer) with a scan rate of 0.04°/min, and the 2θ angle ranged from 10° to 60°.


#### 2.2.4. Cell Culture

The HN5 SCC cell line and Human gingiva fibroblast (HGF1-PI 1) were purchased from the Pasture Institute of Iran. The HN5 and HGF1-PI1 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Germany) culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Germany), 100 U/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Rutin trihydrate was obtained as 99% pure powder (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).


#### 2.2.5. The MTT Assay

The cytotoxic influences of rutin with different concentrations (0-2000μM) and RNs (0-250 μM) on HN5 were evaluated via the MTT assay. The HGF1-PI1 cells as normal oral cells were treated by RNs. Both cell lines were seeded on a 96-well plate at a concentration of 5×103 cells per well in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Rutin (dissolved in 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide) and RNs were added to both cell lines and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 and 48 hours. After, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then, 200 μL of the culture medium comprising 0.5 mg/mL MTT was added to the cells, and plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for four hours. Then, the MTT solution was changed with 200 μL of DMSO and purple formazan crystals were dissolved and read at 570 nm by means of a spectrophotometric microplate reader (BioTek, EL ×800. USA). The cell viability percentage was calculated via the formula below:(1)Cellviability%=ODtest−ODblankODcontrol−ODblank×100.


#### 2.2.6. RNA Extraction

The concentration of rutin nanocrystals for evaluation of gene expression was the IC50 in 24 h. The RiboEx reagent (GeneAll Biotechnology Company, South Korea) was used for RNA extraction according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The extracted RNA was quantified using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). This process provides OD at 260 nm and 280 nm, and the ratio of OD at 260/280 nm wavelength must be about 1.8 to 2.


#### 2.2.7. cDNA Synthesis

For synthesis of cDNA, 50 ng/μL concentration of each RNA sample was prepared, 10 μL of which was reverse transcribed by means of a FIREScript® RT Complete Oligo-(dT) cDNA synthesis kit (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) according to the instructions of the kit manufacturer.


#### 2.2.8. Real-Time PCR

qRT-PCR was performed in a LightCycler® 96 device (Roche Applied Science, USA) by means of a HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR mix kit (Solis BioDyne, Estonia). EvaGreen fluorescent dye bonds to double-strand DNA and emits fluorescent light quantifiable by the real-time device. The amplification reactions were in a total reaction volume of 20μL containing the gene-specific primers (10 pmol for each), 1 μL of cDNA (1000 ng/μL), and PCR master mix. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.Table 1
The primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.
Gene nameSequences (5′-3′)Annealing temperatureProduct size (bp)GAPDH (NCBI accession number NM_002046.7)F: AGCCACATCGCTCAGACACR: GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC6066Bcl2 (NCBI accession number NM_000633.3)F: CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACCR: GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA55128Bax (NCBI accession number NM_138764.5)F: TTTGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCCAR: CTCCATGTTACTGTCCAGTTCGT55151Caspase 8 (NCBI accession number NM_001372051.1)F: TCCAAATGCAAACTGGATGAR: TCCCAGGATGACCCTCTTCT6075Caspase 9 (NCBI accession number NM_001229.5)F: CCAGAGATTCGCAAACCAGAGGR: GAGCACCGACATCACCAAATCC6088The following situations were used for the PCR reactions: 95°C for 12 min for an initial incubation step, followed by 40 cycles of amplification, each cycle comprising of a denaturation step at 95°C for 10 s, an annealing step at 55-60°C for 10 s depending on the primer temperature achieved by a gradient PCR test, and an extension step at 72°C for 10 s. In order to verify the amplicon specificity, the melting curve analysis was also considered. The comparative expression level of genes was calculated via the standard 2-ΔΔct using the GAPDH as housekeeping gene for normalization, where Ct denotes the crossing threshold value calculated.


#### 2.2.9. Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of concentration of rutin and RNs and exposure time on the cell’s viability. One-way ANOVA was utilized to evaluate the RN’s effect on tested genes, and the significance level ofp<0.05 was considered.


## 2.1. Preparation of Rutin Nanocrystals

RNs were prepared by the ultrasonication method and solvent evaporation with rotary. Briefly, rutin (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was dissolved in ethanol (Merck, Germany) and hexane (Merck, Germany) was quickly added to it to achieve 50 mg/mL solution. The ethanol/hexane ratio was 25/75 by volume. The solution was then placed under ultrasonic conditions (AZ, Taiwan) with an ultrasonic source at a frequency of 50 kHz. Tween 80 (2% by weight) was used as a surfactant. The mixture was then mixed at 1000 rpm for 30 minutes. The resulting solution was placed on a rotary, and the solvent was evaporated. The resulting yellow powder was collected as rutin nanoparticles and stored at -20°C.


## 2.2. Characterization Evaluations

### 2.2.1. Particle Size

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) technique (Malvern, United Kingdom) was applied for the determination of the particle size RNs at 25°C.


### 2.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

An SEM instrument (SEM, TESCAN, Warrendale, PA) was utilized for observing the morphology of the prepared RNs. For this, the powder of the nanoparticles was placed on stubs and then coated with a gold layer.


### 2.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

A FTIR instrument (Shimadzu 8400S, Japan) was used for detecting the FTIR spectra of the samples. The potassium bromide (IR grade) was mixed with the RNs and compressed. Besides, XRD of the samples was detected by an X-ray diffractometer (Philips TW 1710 diffractometer) with a scan rate of 0.04°/min, and the 2θ angle ranged from 10° to 60°.


### 2.2.4. Cell Culture

The HN5 SCC cell line and Human gingiva fibroblast (HGF1-PI 1) were purchased from the Pasture Institute of Iran. The HN5 and HGF1-PI1 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Germany) culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Germany), 100 U/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Rutin trihydrate was obtained as 99% pure powder (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).


### 2.2.5. The MTT Assay

The cytotoxic influences of rutin with different concentrations (0-2000μM) and RNs (0-250 μM) on HN5 were evaluated via the MTT assay. The HGF1-PI1 cells as normal oral cells were treated by RNs. Both cell lines were seeded on a 96-well plate at a concentration of 5×103 cells per well in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Rutin (dissolved in 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide) and RNs were added to both cell lines and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 and 48 hours. After, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then, 200 μL of the culture medium comprising 0.5 mg/mL MTT was added to the cells, and plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for four hours. Then, the MTT solution was changed with 200 μL of DMSO and purple formazan crystals were dissolved and read at 570 nm by means of a spectrophotometric microplate reader (BioTek, EL ×800. USA). The cell viability percentage was calculated via the formula below:(1)Cellviability%=ODtest−ODblankODcontrol−ODblank×100.


### 2.2.6. RNA Extraction

The concentration of rutin nanocrystals for evaluation of gene expression was the IC50 in 24 h. The RiboEx reagent (GeneAll Biotechnology Company, South Korea) was used for RNA extraction according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The extracted RNA was quantified using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). This process provides OD at 260 nm and 280 nm, and the ratio of OD at 260/280 nm wavelength must be about 1.8 to 2.


### 2.2.7. cDNA Synthesis

For synthesis of cDNA, 50 ng/μL concentration of each RNA sample was prepared, 10 μL of which was reverse transcribed by means of a FIREScript® RT Complete Oligo-(dT) cDNA synthesis kit (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) according to the instructions of the kit manufacturer.


### 2.2.8. Real-Time PCR

qRT-PCR was performed in a LightCycler® 96 device (Roche Applied Science, USA) by means of a HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR mix kit (Solis BioDyne, Estonia). EvaGreen fluorescent dye bonds to double-strand DNA and emits fluorescent light quantifiable by the real-time device. The amplification reactions were in a total reaction volume of 20μL containing the gene-specific primers (10 pmol for each), 1 μL of cDNA (1000 ng/μL), and PCR master mix. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.Table 1
The primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.
Gene nameSequences (5′-3′)Annealing temperatureProduct size (bp)GAPDH (NCBI accession number NM_002046.7)F: AGCCACATCGCTCAGACACR: GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC6066Bcl2 (NCBI accession number NM_000633.3)F: CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACCR: GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA55128Bax (NCBI accession number NM_138764.5)F: TTTGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCCAR: CTCCATGTTACTGTCCAGTTCGT55151Caspase 8 (NCBI accession number NM_001372051.1)F: TCCAAATGCAAACTGGATGAR: TCCCAGGATGACCCTCTTCT6075Caspase 9 (NCBI accession number NM_001229.5)F: CCAGAGATTCGCAAACCAGAGGR: GAGCACCGACATCACCAAATCC6088The following situations were used for the PCR reactions: 95°C for 12 min for an initial incubation step, followed by 40 cycles of amplification, each cycle comprising of a denaturation step at 95°C for 10 s, an annealing step at 55-60°C for 10 s depending on the primer temperature achieved by a gradient PCR test, and an extension step at 72°C for 10 s. In order to verify the amplicon specificity, the melting curve analysis was also considered. The comparative expression level of genes was calculated via the standard 2-ΔΔct using the GAPDH as housekeeping gene for normalization, where Ct denotes the crossing threshold value calculated.


### 2.2.9. Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of concentration of rutin and RNs and exposure time on the cell’s viability. One-way ANOVA was utilized to evaluate the RN’s effect on tested genes, and the significance level ofp<0.05 was considered.


## 2.2.1. Particle Size

Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) technique (Malvern, United Kingdom) was applied for the determination of the particle size RNs at 25°C.


## 2.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

An SEM instrument (SEM, TESCAN, Warrendale, PA) was utilized for observing the morphology of the prepared RNs. For this, the powder of the nanoparticles was placed on stubs and then coated with a gold layer.


## 2.2.3. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)

A FTIR instrument (Shimadzu 8400S, Japan) was used for detecting the FTIR spectra of the samples. The potassium bromide (IR grade) was mixed with the RNs and compressed. Besides, XRD of the samples was detected by an X-ray diffractometer (Philips TW 1710 diffractometer) with a scan rate of 0.04°/min, and the 2θ angle ranged from 10° to 60°.


## 2.2.4. Cell Culture

The HN5 SCC cell line and Human gingiva fibroblast (HGF1-PI 1) were purchased from the Pasture Institute of Iran. The HN5 and HGF1-PI1 cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Germany) culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Germany), 100 U/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Rutin trihydrate was obtained as 99% pure powder (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).


## 2.2.5. The MTT Assay

The cytotoxic influences of rutin with different concentrations (0-2000μM) and RNs (0-250 μM) on HN5 were evaluated via the MTT assay. The HGF1-PI1 cells as normal oral cells were treated by RNs. Both cell lines were seeded on a 96-well plate at a concentration of 5×103 cells per well in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Rutin (dissolved in 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide) and RNs were added to both cell lines and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 and 48 hours. After, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then, 200 μL of the culture medium comprising 0.5 mg/mL MTT was added to the cells, and plates were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for four hours. Then, the MTT solution was changed with 200 μL of DMSO and purple formazan crystals were dissolved and read at 570 nm by means of a spectrophotometric microplate reader (BioTek, EL ×800. USA). The cell viability percentage was calculated via the formula below:(1)Cellviability%=ODtest−ODblankODcontrol−ODblank×100.


## 2.2.6. RNA Extraction

The concentration of rutin nanocrystals for evaluation of gene expression was the IC50 in 24 h. The RiboEx reagent (GeneAll Biotechnology Company, South Korea) was used for RNA extraction according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The extracted RNA was quantified using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). This process provides OD at 260 nm and 280 nm, and the ratio of OD at 260/280 nm wavelength must be about 1.8 to 2.


## 2.2.7. cDNA Synthesis

For synthesis of cDNA, 50 ng/μL concentration of each RNA sample was prepared, 10 μL of which was reverse transcribed by means of a FIREScript® RT Complete Oligo-(dT) cDNA synthesis kit (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) according to the instructions of the kit manufacturer.


## 2.2.8. Real-Time PCR

qRT-PCR was performed in a LightCycler® 96 device (Roche Applied Science, USA) by means of a HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR mix kit (Solis BioDyne, Estonia). EvaGreen fluorescent dye bonds to double-strand DNA and emits fluorescent light quantifiable by the real-time device. The amplification reactions were in a total reaction volume of 20μL containing the gene-specific primers (10 pmol for each), 1 μL of cDNA (1000 ng/μL), and PCR master mix. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.Table 1
The primers utilized in real-time RT-PCR.
Gene nameSequences (5′-3′)Annealing temperatureProduct size (bp)GAPDH (NCBI accession number NM_002046.7)F: AGCCACATCGCTCAGACACR: GCCCAATACGACCAAATCC6066Bcl2 (NCBI accession number NM_000633.3)F: CCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACCR: GAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATCA55128Bax (NCBI accession number NM_138764.5)F: TTTGCTTCAGGGTTTCATCCAR: CTCCATGTTACTGTCCAGTTCGT55151Caspase 8 (NCBI accession number NM_001372051.1)F: TCCAAATGCAAACTGGATGAR: TCCCAGGATGACCCTCTTCT6075Caspase 9 (NCBI accession number NM_001229.5)F: CCAGAGATTCGCAAACCAGAGGR: GAGCACCGACATCACCAAATCC6088The following situations were used for the PCR reactions: 95°C for 12 min for an initial incubation step, followed by 40 cycles of amplification, each cycle comprising of a denaturation step at 95°C for 10 s, an annealing step at 55-60°C for 10 s depending on the primer temperature achieved by a gradient PCR test, and an extension step at 72°C for 10 s. In order to verify the amplicon specificity, the melting curve analysis was also considered. The comparative expression level of genes was calculated via the standard 2-ΔΔct using the GAPDH as housekeeping gene for normalization, where Ct denotes the crossing threshold value calculated.


## 2.2.9. Statistical Analysis

Two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the effect of concentration of rutin and RNs and exposure time on the cell’s viability. One-way ANOVA was utilized to evaluate the RN’s effect on tested genes, and the significance level ofp<0.05 was considered.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Characterization of Rutin Nanocrystals

The prepared RNs showed a mean particle size of75±0.16 nm. Besides, the SEM results (Figure 2(a)) presented that the RNs had aggregated quasispherical, uniform small particles (Figure 2(b)).Figure 2
Physicochemical characterization of the prepared rutin nanocrystals: (a) distribution of particle size, (b) SEM image, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) FTIR peak for free rutin and rutin nanocrystals.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The prepared RNs exhibited peak intensities suggesting its crystalline state (Figure2(c)). The chemical composition of RNs was evaluated by FTIR spectra, and it could be seen that there were no noticeable differences between the absorption bands of RNs and the bulk rutin in the whole area of absorption bands (Figure 2(d)).


### 3.2. The Cytotoxicity of Rutin and RNs

In order to assess the cytotoxicity of rutin and RNs, cells were treated with several concentrations of rutin and RNs and their viability was assessed by MTT assay. Rutin did not display a significant cytotoxic effect on HN5 cells to 2000μM (Figure 3(a)), but RNs decreased the viability of the cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 of RNs was calculated based on survival percentage for logarithmic concentration. IC50 values of RNs were 30.51 μM and 27.34 μM in 24 and 48 h incubation times, respectively (p<0.05) (Figure 3(b)). There was no significant change in the result of HGF1-PI1 treated by RNs after 24 h and 48 h (Figure 3(c)).Figure 3
The cytotoxicity of rutin and rutin nanocrystals by MTT assay: (a) the cytotoxic effect of rutin on HN5 cells in 24 and 48 h, (b) the cytotoxic effect of RNs on HN5 cells with the calculation of IC50 in 24 and 48 h, and (c) the cytotoxic effect of RNs on HGF1-PI1 in 24 h and 48 h.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.3. The Expression Level ofBax and Bcl-2 Genes and Ratio of Bax/Bcl-2

The results of real-time RT-PCR technique displayed thatBax mRNA level was showed a slightly and statistically not significant reduction in rutin- and RN-treated cells (Figure 4(a)). The mRNA expression level of Bcl-2 was significantly decreased in both rutin- and RN-treated cells (p<0.05; Figure 4(b)). Bax/Bcl-2 ratio is an important indicator in susceptibility of cells to apoptosis. Our results displayed a significant increase in the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 in RN-treated cells (p<0.05; Figure 4(c)).Figure 4
Expression levels ofBax and Bcl-2 genes and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio of rutin- and RN-treated cells compared with control.
(a)(b)(c)


### 3.4. The Expression Level ofCaspase-8 and -9

The results show a delicate change in the mRNA expression level ofcaspase-8 that is not statistically significant in rutin- and RN-treated cells (Figure 5(a)). Similarly, the gene expression level of caspase-9 was gently increased in RN-treated cells, even though that is not significant (Figure 5(b)).Figure 5
Expression levels ofCaspase-8 and -9 of rutin- and RN-treated cells compared with control.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. Characterization of Rutin Nanocrystals

The prepared RNs showed a mean particle size of75±0.16 nm. Besides, the SEM results (Figure 2(a)) presented that the RNs had aggregated quasispherical, uniform small particles (Figure 2(b)).Figure 2
Physicochemical characterization of the prepared rutin nanocrystals: (a) distribution of particle size, (b) SEM image, (c) XRD pattern, and (d) FTIR peak for free rutin and rutin nanocrystals.
(a)(b)(c)(d)The prepared RNs exhibited peak intensities suggesting its crystalline state (Figure2(c)). The chemical composition of RNs was evaluated by FTIR spectra, and it could be seen that there were no noticeable differences between the absorption bands of RNs and the bulk rutin in the whole area of absorption bands (Figure 2(d)).


## 3.2. The Cytotoxicity of Rutin and RNs

In order to assess the cytotoxicity of rutin and RNs, cells were treated with several concentrations of rutin and RNs and their viability was assessed by MTT assay. Rutin did not display a significant cytotoxic effect on HN5 cells to 2000μM (Figure 3(a)), but RNs decreased the viability of the cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. The IC50 of RNs was calculated based on survival percentage for logarithmic concentration. IC50 values of RNs were 30.51 μM and 27.34 μM in 24 and 48 h incubation times, respectively (p<0.05) (Figure 3(b)). There was no significant change in the result of HGF1-PI1 treated by RNs after 24 h and 48 h (Figure 3(c)).Figure 3
The cytotoxicity of rutin and rutin nanocrystals by MTT assay: (a) the cytotoxic effect of rutin on HN5 cells in 24 and 48 h, (b) the cytotoxic effect of RNs on HN5 cells with the calculation of IC50 in 24 and 48 h, and (c) the cytotoxic effect of RNs on HGF1-PI1 in 24 h and 48 h.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.3. The Expression Level ofBax and Bcl-2 Genes and Ratio of Bax/Bcl-2

The results of real-time RT-PCR technique displayed thatBax mRNA level was showed a slightly and statistically not significant reduction in rutin- and RN-treated cells (Figure 4(a)). The mRNA expression level of Bcl-2 was significantly decreased in both rutin- and RN-treated cells (p<0.05; Figure 4(b)). Bax/Bcl-2 ratio is an important indicator in susceptibility of cells to apoptosis. Our results displayed a significant increase in the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 in RN-treated cells (p<0.05; Figure 4(c)).Figure 4
Expression levels ofBax and Bcl-2 genes and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio of rutin- and RN-treated cells compared with control.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.4. The Expression Level ofCaspase-8 and -9

The results show a delicate change in the mRNA expression level ofcaspase-8 that is not statistically significant in rutin- and RN-treated cells (Figure 5(a)). Similarly, the gene expression level of caspase-9 was gently increased in RN-treated cells, even though that is not significant (Figure 5(b)).Figure 5
Expression levels ofCaspase-8 and -9 of rutin- and RN-treated cells compared with control.
(a)(b)


## 4. Discussion

Nanotechnology and nanomedical concepts represent the possibilities for developing rutin delivery systems at the nanoscale. We prepared RNs to enhance efficiency and investigate their ability to prevent the proliferation of HN-5 cellsin vitro. The prepared RNs had a mean particle size of 75±0.16 nm and aggregated quasispherical, uniform small particles (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). The type of applied preparation method has a great impact on the morphology of the resulting nanoparticles. Thorat and Dalvi showed that in the presence of an ultrasonic system, the resulting nanoparticles have a predominantly aggregate quasispherical morphology [23]. The prepared RNs exhibited the lower peak intensities comparing to the bulk rutin, suggesting the smaller sizes and lower crystallinity that was consistent with our SEM results (Figure 2(c)).The FTIR study (Figure2(d)) exhibited absorptions for stretching of C=O groups; 1730 cm−1 for the ester group, 1460 cm−1 for the ketone group, and 1390 cm−1 for the ether group. Besides, a broad peak at 3400 cm−1 is related to the stretching vibration of the OH group [24–26]. There were no noticeable differences between the absorption bands of RNs and the free rutin in the whole area of absorption bands. Then, the results showed that the sonication method did not show any effect on the chemical compositions of rutin.When examined for its capability to suppress the growth of cancer cells, we found that cytotoxicity of RNs was at least 100 times more than free rutin.It may be clarified that rutin nanocrystals are well soluble in water. The good solubility of nanocrystals decreases the energy barrier and consequently increases the intermembrane transfer rate. Then, the absorption of rutin in nanoform into cells is higher than that of bulk rutin [27]. Hoai et al. also reported this explanation for their rutin-loaded polymeric nanoparticles [27]. Besides, it has shown that particle size and shape eventually control the successful uptake of nanoparticles into cells and have an important role for initial internalization into cells [28]. The prepared RNs in this study had a mean particle size of 75±0.16 nm and a quasispherical shape. Some reports show that the spherical nanoparticles reveal the fastest internalization rate, compared to the other morphologies [29]. Based on free energy rules, the spherical nanoparticles need to overcome a minimal membrane bending energy barrier, compared with the nonspherical particles [29]. It has also shown that small particles (between 25 and 100 nm) are likely to be ingested by tip-first uptake mode, facing the membrane with the lowest curvature side [28, 30].Apoptotic conditions are triggered by cytotoxic agents as the death signaling pathways are initiated by insensitive target cells [31]. The death receptor systems are simultaneously or consequently activated due to activation of apoptotic conditions by chemotherapy, while the mitochondrial functions, as well as caspases proteolytic processing, are also disturbed [32]. Therefore, it is possible that the cellular death pathway occurs in different locations; nevertheless, there is no complete information on the exact molecular mechanisms involved in every special medicine and each specific target cell. The present work provided reports on the alterations in Bcl-2 (antiapoptotic) and Bax (proapoptotic) genes’ expression and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio as well as caspase-8 and -9 expression levels after stimulating apoptotic state through RNs in HN-5 cells.For assessment of cytotoxicity induced by rutin and RNs, the MTT assay was applied. Rutin did not show any significant cytotoxic effect on HN5 cells to 2000μM, but RNs displayed cytotoxic effect with an IC50 of 30.51 μM and 27.34 μM in 24 and 48 h incubation times, respectively (p<0.05).The death or survival of the cells is mainly regulated by the Bcl-2 family members. Chemotherapy controls partly the expression of different Bcl-2 family members in cancerous cells. The proteins of this family contribute significantly to the apoptotic conditions through activation (Bax) or inhibition (Bcl-2) [33, 34].Three different parameters were examined in the present work includingBax and Bcl-2 gene absolute expression levels, along with their rations in vitro. The ratios of Bax to Bcl-2 help determine the cell destiny compared to their absolute concentrations [35]. A considerable percentage of Bax to Bcl-2 ratios is originated when HN-5 is treated by RNs (p<0.05). Therefore, according to the observations in the present work and similar studies, imbalanced expression of Bax and Bcl-2 overtreating by RNs seems to contribute significantly to apoptotic conditions induced by RNs [36].The presence of a special apoptotic mechanism in the treatment of HN-5 cells by RNs is supported in this study, since the increase in the ratio ofBax to Bcl-2 makes cells less viable while the apoptotic state increases. Furthermore, the expression of Bax seems to activate caspases and subsequent apoptotic conditions [37, 38].


## 5. Conclusion

RNs can show a minimum of 100 times higher potential in suppressing the development of cancerous cells compared to bulk rutin. Based on the obtained data, increasing the ratio ofBax to Bcl-2 contributes significantly to HN-5 cell apoptotic state triggered by RNs; nevertheless, more research is required for validation of these results. The present findings can highlight the unharnessed capability of RNs as adjuvants to be applied in the treatment of different cancerous cells.



---

*Source: 9980451-2021-10-01.xml*