# On Quasinormal Modes for Scalar Perturbations of Static Spherically Symmetric Black Holes in Nash Embedding Framework

Authors: Sergio C. Ulhoa; Ronni G. G. Amorim; Abraão J. S. Capistrano
Journal: Advances in High Energy Physics
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In this paper we investigate scalar perturbations of black holes embedded in a five-dimensional bulk space. The quasinormal frequencies of such black holes are calculated using the third order of Wentzel, Kramers, and Brillouin (WKB) approximation for scalar perturbations. The high overtones of quasinormal modes indicate a resonant-like set of black holes suggesting a serious constraint of embedding models in five dimensions.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The black hole solutions can be perturbed by some matter field; then it leads to oscillations, which can be explained by an analogy with a vibrating string; in such a system the oscillations decrease with time as the string loses energy to the environment [1]. Similarly to the string, where its frequency can be expressed by a complex parameter called quasinormal frequency, the perturbations of black holes evolve with time as an oscillation with complex frequency, in which the real part is responsible for the period of oscillation and the imaginary part is responsible for damping or amplification. Thus proper oscillations of black holes are also called quasinormal modes.Historically, the theoretical study on perturbations of black holes began with the seminal paper of Regge and Wheeler in 1957 in which they studied the stability of Schwarzschild black hole submitted to small perturbations [2]. In the 70s, the quasinormal modes were used by Vishveshwara in calculations of scattering of gravitational waves by a Schwarzschild black hole [3]. Since then, the study of this issue was directed to several problems. Black holes stability is an example of this importance. The relevance of studying the stability of these astrophysical objects is the possibility of understanding theories in higher dimensions as aspects of brane-world and string theory [4, 5] and variants. Since the uniqueness theorem is not applicable to more than four dimensions, stability can be the criterion to select physical solutions [6, 7]. Another important application of the quasinormal modes of black holes is in the study of the ADS/CFT correspondence [8], whereby the imaginary part of the quasinormal fundamental frequency describes the thermalization time in a conformal invariant field theory in the border of the anti-de-Sitter space-time. In addition, there are prospects that in the near future more oscillations of astrophysical black holes can be observed using gravitational waves detectors as in LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration [9] and be an important tool to constrain higher dimensional models [10, 11]. This fact is relevant in the sense that quasinormal modes carry information about stellar objects, such as mass, charge, and angular momentum.Considering the relevance of the quasinormal modes, in this work we study scalar perturbation of a black hole embedded in a five-dimensional bulk space by calculating its quasinormal frequencies. In this sense, this paper is organized as follows. In Section2, we present a summary of the Nash embedding theorem to study the induced four-dimensional equations embedded in a five-dimensional bulk space. In Section 3, we present the induced potential in embedded spherically symmetric vacuum solution. In Section 4, we discuss scalar perturbations. In Section 5, we present the quasinormal modes for treated system using WKB approach and the resulting effective potential. In Section 6, we present our concluding remarks.


## 2. Embedded Induced Four-Dimensional Equations

The proof of the Poincaré conjecture by Perelman [12, 13] suggests a new paradigm for geometry and in particular for Einstein’s gravitation and cosmology, namely, the possibility that we can deform space-time in arbitrary directions, changing its shape. It has its origins from a solution for the Riemann curvature ambiguity was conjectured by L. Schlaefli in 1871, proposing that the Riemann manifolds should be embedded in a larger bulk space, such that its Riemann curvature R would act as a curvature reference for all embedded manifolds, just like the flat Euclidean space R3 which acts as a curvature reference for surfaces. The Schlaefli conjecture is the origin of the embedding problem for Riemann’s geometry. Formally we may write his proposal as(1)RU,VW=RU,VW+extrinsic  terms.To detail this, we must rewrite this expression in terms of components in a suitable reference frame. This can be done in an arbitrary vielbein defined in the bulk and then by separating the bulk curvature tensor in normal and tangent components. With the purpose of understanding the meaning of the Schlaefli proposal we write these components in the Gaussian frame defined by the embedding map itself. In this frame the components of the extrinsic terms appear as the extrinsic curvature component. This allows us to relate different geometries with different properties through a differential embedding.In order to make an appropriate embedding between smooth (differentiable) geometries, we use the Nash embedding theorem [14] in order to propose a new theoretical structure able to relate it to a physical theory. Nash showed that any embedded perturbed metric g~μν can be generated by a continuous sequence of small metric perturbations of a given initially unperturbed geometry gμν by means of(2)g~μν=gμν+δyakμνa+δyaδybgρσkμρakνσb+⋯,or, equivalently,(3)kμν=-12∂gμν∂y,where y is the coordinate related to extra dimensions. Since Nash’s smooth deformations are applied to the embedding process, the coordinate y usually noticed in rigid embedded models [15, 16] can be omitted in the process for perturbing the element line. This seems particularly interesting to astrophysical and cosmological problems in which traditionally the gravitational perturbation mechanisms are essentially plagued by coordinate gauges due to the group of diffeomorphisms.The Einstein-Hilbert principle leads toD-dimensional Einstein’s equations for the bulk metric GAB in arbitrary coordinates (4)RAB-12RGAB=G∗TAB∗,where we have dispensed the bulk cosmological constant and TAB∗ denotes the energy-momentum tensor of the known matter and gauge fields. The constant G∗ determines the D-dimensional energy scale. For the present application, capital Latin indices run from 1 to 5. Small case Latin indices refer to the only one extra dimension considered. All Greek indices refer to the embedded space-time counting from 1 to 4.Concerning the confinement, the four-dimensionality of the space-time is an experimentally established fact associated with the Poincaré invariance of Maxwell’s equations and their dualities, also valid for Yang-Mills gauge fields restricted to four dimensions [17, 18]. Even though the duality properties can be mathematically extended to higher dimensions, we adopt it as a condition based on experimental backgrounds [19]. Therefore, all matter, which interacts with these gauge fields, must for consistency be also defined in the four-dimensional space-time. This consideration complements a physical interpretation for the Nash theorem that provides an interesting mechanism for perturbing and creating new geometries. In this five-dimensional framework present here, only the components that access higher dimensions are related to the extrinsic curvature kμν, while the metric components are confined to the geometry as shown in (2). On the other hand, in spite of all efforts made so far, the gravitational interaction has failed to fit into a similar gauge scheme, so that the gravitational field does not necessarily have the same four-dimensional limitations, regardless of the location of its sources.In order to recover Einstein’s gravity by reversing the embedding, the confinement of ordinary matter and gauge fields implies that the tangent components ofG∗TAB∗ in the above equations must coincide with (8πGTμν) where Tμν is the energy-momentum tensor of the confined sources. As it may have been already noted, we are essentially reproducing a framework similar to brane-world program [20], with the difference that we apply a dynamical differential embedding and have nothing to do with branes as those defined in string/M theory. Using the Nash embedding theorem together with the four-dimensionality of gauge fields, one can obtain the Einstein-Hilbert principle for the bulk and a D-dimensional energy scale G∗.In addition, one can define a five-dimensional local embedding with an embedding mapZ:V4→V5. We admit that the function Zμ is a regular and differentiable map with V4, which stands for the four embedded space-time types, and V5 which refers to the bulk itself. The components ZA=fA(x1,…,x4) associate with each point of V4 a point in V5 with coordinates ZA. These coordinates are the components of the tangent vectors of V4. Accordingly, calculating the components of (4), one can find the induces equations for the embedded geometry:(5)Rμν-12Rgμν-Qμν=-8πGTμν,(6)kμ;ρρ-h,μ=0,where now Tμν is the energy-momentum tensor of the confined matter. The quantities h2=h·h with h=gμνkμν and K2=kμνkμν are the mean curvature and Gaussian curvature, respectively. Moreover, one defines(7)Qμν=kρμkρν-hkμν-12K2-h2gμν.This tensor is independently conserved, as it can be directly verified that (semicolon denoting covariant derivative with respect to gμν)(8)Qμν;ν=0.A detailed derivation of these equations can be found in [21–23] and references therein as well as the higher dimensional case. Hereafter, we use a system of unit such that c=G=1.


## 3. Induced Potential in a Spherically Symmetric Vacuum Solution

As shown in a previous work [24], we start with the general static spherically symmetric induced metric that can be described by the line element as(9)ds2=Brdt2-Ardr2-r2dθ2-r2sin2⁡θdϕ2,where we denote the functions A(r)=A and B(r)=B. Thus, one can obtain the following components for the Ricci tensor: (10)Rrr=B′′2B-14B′BA′A+B′B-1rA′A,Rθθ=-1+r2A-A′A+B′B+1A,Rϕϕ=sin2⁡θRθθ,Rtt=-B′′2A+14B′AA′A+B′B-1rB′A,where we have dA/dr=A′ and dB/dr=B′.From (5), the gravitational-tensor vacuum equations (with Tμν=0) can be written in alternative form as(11)Rμν+12Qgμν=Qμν, where we use the contraction Q=gμνQμν.The general solution of Codazzi equations (see (6)) is given by(12)kμν=fμgμνno  sum  onμ, Taking the former equation and the definition of Qμν, one can write (13)Qμν=fμ2gμν-∑αfαfμgμν-12∑αfα2-∑αfα2gμν,where (14)Uμ=fμ2-∑αfαfμ-12∑αfα2-∑αfα2δμμ.Consequently, we can write Qμν in terms of fμ as(15)Qμν=Uμgμνno  sum  onμ.A straightforward consequence of the homogeneity of Codazzi equations (see (6)) embedded in five dimensions is that the individual arbitrariness of the functions fμ can be reduced to a unique arbitrary function α that depends on the radial coordinate. Hence, (12) turns to be(16)kμν=αrgμν, with α(r)=α. With a straightforward calculation, one can obtain the coefficients of the metric as(17)Br=1+Kr+9r∫α2rr2dr,(18)Ar=Br-1=1+kr+9r∫α2rr2dr-1, where k is a constant. In order to constrain this arbitrariness, we look at the characteristics of the extrinsic curvature itself in the asymptotic limit, which matches the requirement to local astrophysical applications. The extrinsic curvature at infinity goes to a flat space obeying the asymptotically conformal flat condition. This can be understood as the following form:(19)limr→∞⁡kμν=limr→∞⁡αrlimr→∞⁡gμν.Since the function α(r) must be analytical at infinity, one can write the simplest option(20)αr=∑n=is-α0γ∗rn,where the sum is upon all scalar potentials and the indices i and s are real numbers. Since these scalar potentials have their origin in the extrinsic curvature they do not remain confined in the embedded geometry propagating in the extra dimension. The index n represents all the set of scalar fields that fall off with r-coordinate following the nth-power law decaying. Equation (20) is essentially the representation of the effect of extrinsic curvature leading to a local modification of the space-time without producing umbilical point as expected for a spherical geometry. Depending on the variation of the function α(r) one can have a bent or stretched geometry without ripping off the manifold, and, curiously, in the same notion as pointed by Riemann himself [25]. It was shown that the parameter α0 has cosmological magnitude [24, 26]; that is, it does not depend on individual astrophysical properties and has the same units as the Hubble constant. Its modulus is of the order of 0.677 km·s−1·Mpc−1. In addition, to keep the right dimension of (20) we have introduced a unitary parameter γ∗ that has the inverse unit of Hubble constant and also establishes the cosmological horizon in (9). Hence, the horizons of (9) can be found when we set gtt=0, and one can obtain(21)∑n=is9α03-2nr3-2n+r-2M=0, which is a polynomial equation of order (3-2n) that gives a class of horizons to be defined for all allowed values of n.Using (17) and (20), one can obtain an explicit form of the coefficient B(r) given by(22)Br=1+k9α02+1r-∑n=is9α0γ∗2n-3r21-n.In terms of the correspondence principle with Einstein equations, we set k(9α02+1)=-2M, which remains valid even in the limit when α0→0 in order to obtain the asymptotically flat solution. It is worth mentioning a qualitative aspect that the diffeomorphic transformations commonly known in the realm of general relativity do not necessarily apply even when α0→0. This comes from the fact that structure of the embedded space (and its relation to the bulk) breaks down the equivalence principle of general relativity. In other words, the diffeomorphism must be imposed as an assumption to recover full general relativity.


## 4. Scalar Perturbations

In this section, we focus our attention on the study of (22) under scalar perturbations. The study of quasinormal modes can be treated by scalar fields and appropriate metrics. In this section, we construct the Klein-Gordon equation in a curved space-time embedded in a five-dimensional space-time. In order to achieve such a goal, we consider the line element in the form(23)ds2=frdt2-fr-1dr2+r2dΩ. It is well known that the massless Klein-Gordon equation is given by(24)∇μ∇μΦ=0, or, equivalently,(25)1-g∂μ-ggμν∂μΦ=0, where Φ=Φ(r,θ,ϕ,t). Using (23), we can write(26)-g=r2sin⁡θ. Moreover, (25) can be written as(27)1fr∂2Φ∂t2-∂∂rfr∂Φ∂r-2frr∂Φ∂r-1r2sin⁡θ∂∂θsin⁡θ∂Φ∂ϕ-1r2sin2⁡θ∂2Φ∂ϕ2=0. Taking the ansatz(28)Φr,θ,ϕ,t=∑l=0∞∑m=-llYl,mθ,ϕe-iωtψl,mrr, we obtain(29)1sin⁡θ∂∂θsin⁡θ∂∂ϕ-1sin2⁡θ∂2∂ϕ2Yl,mθ,ϕ=-ll+1Yl,mθ,ϕ,where Yl,m(θ,ϕ) are the spherical harmonics.(30)-ω2fr+ll+1r2-fr∂2∂r2-f′r∂∂r-2frr∂∂rψl,mrr=0. Taking the following coordinates change dx=dr/f(r), we obtain the master wave equation(31)d2ψl,mrdx2+ω2-Vxψl,mr=0, where we denote (32)Vx=fxll+1x2+fxf′xx.If we consider (22), then we finally get(33)fr=1-2Mr+∑jα02j-3r21-j.Once the potentialV is well defined, we plot its behaviour for different values of α0 and l, which are given in Figures 1 and 2.Figure 1
The potentialV in function of the radius for values l=0 (solid thick line), l=1 (long-dashed line), l=2 (dashed line), l=3 (dot-dashed line), and l=4 (dotted line) for the fixed values of α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.Figure 2
The potentialV in function of the radius for values l=0 (solid thick line), l=1 (long-dashed line), l=2 (dashed line), l=3 (dot-dashed line), and l=4 (dotted line) for the fixed values of α0=2, M=1, and μ=0.For a massive field the potential is modified toV(r)→V(r)+μ2f(r)/r; the angular part remains the same. In Figure 3 we plot such a potential for α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.1M.Figure 3
The potentialV in function of the radius for values l=0 (solid thick line), l=1 (long-dashed line), l=2 (dashed line), l=3 (dot-dashed line), and l=4 (dotted line) for the fixed values of α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.1M.It is interesting to analyze the potential as a function of the tortoise coordinate to understand the black hole stability. Using such a coordinate the space is described from the black hole horizon to infinity. The event horizon is calculated as a solution of (21) which yields rh=0.459413 for α=0.677 and rh=0.534067 for α=2. It was argued by Chandrasekhar [27] that the stability of the perturbation is determined by the sign of the potential outside the black hole. As it is seen from Figures 4, 5, and 6, the potential seems to be unstable for high values of l since it is negative; particularly for Figure 6 the potential stays positive outside the black hole, which could change its sign for bigger values of l. This justifies further investigation; thus we will present in the next section the calculation of the quasinormal modes.Figure 4
The potentialV in function of the tortoise coordinates for the fixed values of α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.Figure 5
The potentialV in function of the tortoise coordinates for the fixed values of α0=2, M=1, and μ=0.Figure 6
The potentialV in function of the tortoise coordinates for the fixed values of α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.1M.For the sake of completeness we present the behaviour of the potential in the whole space-time outside the black hole (fromrh=0.459413 to ∞) for α0=0.677 and μ=0, μ=0.1M, respectively, in Figures 7 and 8.Figure 7
The potentialV in function of r, from rh=0.459413 to ∞ for α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.Figure 8
The potentialV in function of r, from rh=0.459413 to ∞ for α0=0.677, M=1, and μ=0.1M.Forα0=2 the potential is too narrow to be seen in the range 0.534067 to ∞. Such a behaviour is expected due to cosmological implications of the constant α0. For instance, the magnitude of this parameter would lead to a big rip model.


## 5. Quasinormal Modes in WKB Approximation

In this section, we use the Wentzel, Kramers, and Brillouin (WKB) approximation in such a regime where the frequency is given by [28] (34)ıω2-V0-2V0′′-∑i=2kΛi=n+12,where V0 and V0′′ are the effective potential and its second derivative, respectively, as taken at the point of the maximum of V. The sum above represents high order correction in the usual WKB method [29]. Thus the higher the order of approximation is, the better the result is, which could be comparable to numerical methods [28]. In this sense it is enough to work with the third-order WKB approximation [30], which is given by(35)ωn,l2=V0+-2V0′′1/2Λ-ın+12-2V0′′1/21+Ω,where(36)Λ=1-2V0′′1/218V04V0′′14+β2-1288V0′′′V0′′27+60β2,Ω=1-2V0′′56912V0′′′V0′′477+188β2-1384V0′′′2V04V0′′351+100β2+12304V04V0′′267+68β2+1288V0′′′V05V0′′219+28β2-1288V06V0′′5+4β2. Here β=n+1/2 and V0(n)=dnV/dxnx=x0. The point x0 is the solution of the equation dV/dx(x0)=0, which means a point of maximum of the effective potential. We point out that x is the tortoise coordinate, already defined.Next we chart our results on Tables1, 2, and 3. We see from Table 1 that the scalar perturbation for a realistic value of α is not stable. This complements our previous work in which we concluded that such a solution is not globally thermodynamically stable and its stability is reduced to very constrained range [31]. On the other hand from Tables 2 and 3 we see that the stability may be achieved by a choice of a hypothetical value of α (in this case, α>0.667 will lead to a faster accelerated regime as expected for a phantom-like cosmology [26] and black holes in this context are usually unstable) or for a massive scalar field. In all scenarios the real part of the frequency increases rapidly, which indicates that the quasinormal frequency oscillates faster for each mode. Hence, due to the positive growing of the imaginary part, such a behaviour is very similar to a resonance.Table 1
Quasinormal modes of scalar perturbations forα0=0.677 with M=1 and μ=0.
l n ω n l 0 0 5.102614010 - 8.026857534 i 1 0 4.444548318 - 8.863420102 i 1 11.59600413 - 26.25141968 i 2 0 2.556070877 - 9.893346520 i 1 6.342841226 - 24.95915206 i 2 12.94011467 - 41.62859430 i 3 0 0.3142845589 + 12.96051935 i 1 38.84486810 - 53.32057992 i 2 93.40199364 - 111.3133472 i 3 160.5504266 - 181.4993689 i 4 0 2.789319410 + 26.91329506 i 1 136.9620887 + 165.7373689 i 2 317.9204012 + 354.6421808 i 3 540.1554148 + 583.4781202 i 4 797.3633624 + 846.4289944 i 5 0 6.400241451 + 55.35392070 i 1 301.0022385 + 362.7954640 i 2 697.9325995 + 777.2504936 i 3 1185.464821 + 1279.187469 i 4 1749.721283 + 1855.936081 iTable 2
Quasinormal modes of scalar perturbations forα0=2 with M=1 and μ=0.
l n ω n l 0 0 28.54240977 - 35.52756231 i 1 0 28.98497167 - 36.65093824 i 1 103.8128126 - 126.3594331 i 2 0 29.20727668 - 38.11077359 i 1 106.1438323 - 128.6137680 i 2 224.2314700 - 254.7665296 i 3 0 26.35460874 - 37.16001393 i 1 95.10645314 - 118.6073793 i 2 200.6518286 - 232.2842502 i 3 333.1889473 - 371.1040372 i 4 0 14.72079936 - 30.28374333 i 1 47.53015516 - 80.58865151 i 2 100.4540639 - 146.2752812 i 3 169.1566913 - 224.7764688 i 4 250.6229786 - 314.4239174 i 5 0 0.5248454700 +28.40271014i 1 45.08904231 - 85.15794051 i 2 116.4495623 - 166.1450658 i 3 205.7296676 - 263.8287746 i 4 309.9693513 - 375.5150908 iTable 3
Quasinormal modes of massive scalar perturbations forα0=0.677 and μ=0.1M with M=1.
l n ω n l 0 0 5.102614010 - 8.026857534 i 1 0 29.00936098 - 36.67332200 i 1 103.9107237 - 126.4501766 i 2 0 29.23683246 - 38.13734008 i 1 106.2610002 - 128.7222323 i 2 224.4751039 - 254.9976125 i 3 0 26.38849620 - 37.18864399 i 1 95.24043132 - 118.7279173 i 2 200.9301766 - 232.5433005 i 3 333.6438082 - 371.5352605 i 4 0 14.74857813 - 30.30037176 i 1 47.63840864 - 80.66160380 i 2 100.6803470 - 146.4444515 i 3 169.5250565 - 225.0711954 i 4 797.6039393 + 846.6872620 i 5 0 0.5217309759 + 28.39953701 i 1 45.02864470 - 85.11181068 i 2 116.3098696 - 166.0264653 i 3 205.4963229 - 263.6210918 i 4 309.6292522 - 375.2043911 i


## 6. Conclusion

In this article we have analyzed the stability of the line element obtained in [24, 31], under scalar perturbations. Such a metric was derived by searching a solution for a four-dimensional metric spherically symmetric embedded in a five-dimensional bulk space. Thus we have identified an effective potential that composes the gravitational field equations. We have calculated the scalar quasinormal modes of Klein-Gordon equation in order to get some information on the stability of our metric. We have concluded that the massive scalar perturbation yields a stable configuration or a nonrealistic massless perturbation, as can be possibly seen from Tables 2 and 3. We point out that the instability of the solution for massless scalar perturbation with α0=0.677 complements our previous observation about the thermodynamical features of such a solution that leads to a local thermal stability of those black holes constrained to a narrow window of scalar fields [31]. A natural extension of this work is to study a different type of perturbations (e.g., vector, electromagnetic, gravitational) in order to perform a more general analysis on stability and possible orbits.Interestingly, only considering the scalar modes, the resulting frequencies present high absolute values of the high overtone modes, differently as compared to those of rigid embedding models [32–35]. It has a dramatic consequence that leads to resonant-like black holes to restricted spectra of scalar modes. All presented results suggest that the physical consequence of a four-sphere symmetric metric dynamically embedded in five-dimensional bulk may lead to unstable solutions and evinces that a higher dimensional structure is a necessary condition. It reinforces, for example, why RS solutions for a Schwarzschild back hole may be unstable [36].Also, another interesting fact emerges from the negative gap in the effective potential in the present model as it matches some results known in literature. For instance, in the context of a generalised general relativity, the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory (also known as Lovelock theory) [37] admits static symmetric black holes but they are unstable for five and six dimensions in which the hyperbolic equations do not arise from Cauchy initial data. Specifically, the scalar perturbations in five dimensions provide a considerable negative effective potential where the hyperbolicity is violated regarding small black holes (with arbitrary small mass) and they do not exist.Similar conclusions are found in [38] that show instability of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet black holes in de Sitter space-time. This instability has its origin in the nonzero positive cosmological constant through the so-called eikonal instability (in the sense of geometrical optics the quasinormal modes go to infinity) which leads to instability with agreement that “unstable modes cannot be oscillatory when perturbing spherically symmetric static black holes” [39], which reinforces our results in a different context. The main point we want to stress is that such instability suggested by our analysis comes from the fact that the five-dimensional bulk is not appropriate geometric architecture for a dynamical embedding concerning static spherical symmetries [40–42] and the stable points should be very restricted [31]; thus it may represent a serious constraint for five-dimensional embedding models even though global embedding may be possible [43].Moreover, we do not have specifically a solution directly related to RS models but using the WKB method our results show high absolute values in both low and high overtones, differently from those presented in the RS models. As a counterexample, we need to show what happens in this particular case, as one can see this behaviour essentially at the model=3 with α0=0.667, which shows being sensitive to scalar perturbations. We point out that the effective potentials in higher dimensions are commonly nonpositive definite, which may cause instability, so in a way we expected negative values of the effective potential at some point. Remarkably, we also expected that when the parameter α0>0.667 the dynamics of the embedded space-time should resemble one that phantom (exotic) models have due to the fact that black holes from this sort of behaviour are generally unstable, but we had, in principle, positive values for the effective potential, where in some sense we should expect some region of stability for this condition. On the other hand, the importance of the values shown by using the WKB method shows us that, in summary, the spherically neutral symmetric metric provides resonant-like black holes showing that they are sensitive to scalar perturbations and may be stable at a low range of set of scalar fields. This result is a consequence of the type of embedding made (e.g., Schwarzschild metric is not embedded in five dimensions). In other words, it is necessary to add more degrees of freedom leading to a six-dimensional space-time, if one thinks in terms of a sought-after future unified field theory.



---

*Source: 9891231-2017-02-14.xml*