# Qualitative Analysis of Indoor and Outdoor Airborne Fungi in Cowshed

Authors: R. Pavan; K. Manjunath
Journal: Journal of Mycology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Air pollution is one of the most serious problems to human health. Fungi are the causal agents for different diseases in animals, plants, and human beings. Otomycosis, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, asthma, allergy, and systemic mycosis are among the fungal diseases caused. The present study was conducted to analyze the monthly incidence of airborne fungi, seasonal variation, and influence of meteorological parameters in indoor and outdoor fungi of cowshed at Hesaraghatta village, Bangalore. An aeromycological survey of indoor and outdoor area of cowshed at Hesaraghatta village in Bangalore city was carried out using the Andersen two-stage sampler onto a petri dish containing malt extract agar from January 2011 to December 2011. Altogether, 29 species belonging to 13 genera from indoor and 26 species belonging to 12 genera were recorded from outdoor environment of the cowshed; the dominant fungal species identified wereCladosporium sp., Aspergillus sp., and Alternaria alternata. Seasonal occurrence of fungal spores in both indoor and outdoor of the cowshed revealed that maximum spores were recorded in summer season followed by winter and rainy season.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Airborne particles are present throughout the environment. Despite the fact that atmospheric air does not favour growth of microorganisms due to lack of nutrients, the microorganisms are present in aerosol form, suspended in the air. The basic sources of microbes are soil, water, animals, and humans and they originate in many different forms and affect visibility, climate, human health, and the quality of life [1]. Airborne microbial quantity and quality vary with time of day, year, and location [2].Fungi are common in indoor and outdoor environment. Nearly 10% of people worldwide have fungal allergy [3]. Numerous studies have shown that exposure to fungi may be associated with acute toxic effects, allergies, and asthma [4]. Researchers believe that more than 80 genera of fungi are associated with symptoms of respiratory tract allergies [5]. Over 100 species of fungi are involved with serious human and animal infections, whereas many other species cause serious plant diseases [6]. Many fungal spores are involved in respiratory allergies and different kinds of infections [7].Fungal aerosols produced in animal rearing houses may threaten caretakers and external environment. Respiratory infection or damage may occur in caretakers as well as in animal rearing houses with prolonged exposure to the environment at high microorganism levels [8]. Microbial aerosols of high levels are also associated with allergy and asthma in caretakers [9]. Airborne fungi have much attention from medical researchers as well as environmentalists [10]. At present, there are numerous studies highlighting both outdoor and indoor environments, especially in buildings frequented by a large number of people, who may be exposed to this type of aeroallergen [11], and many authors indicated that the dominant fungi were and in the atmosphere and their concentration differed from place to place, because of local environmental variables, fungal substrates, and human activities.Many studies have investigated the concentrations of airborne fungal spores from cowshed places and a relatively high frequency ofAspergillus sp.,Cladosporium sp.,Curvularia sp.,Penicillium sp.,Alternaria sp.,Fusarium sp.,Helminthosporium sp., andTrichoderma species was recorded [12, 13]. The type of breeding, the method of feed distribution, and airflow velocity in animal rearing houses were suggested as the agents significantly modifying the level of fungi [14].Airborne fungal spore is related to multiple aerodynamic factors, such as spore size, shape, weight, and electrostatic properties of their walls [15, 16]. Geographical location, climate, and meteorological factors (temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, and rainfall) are responsible for indoor and outdoor types and levels of fungal spores behavior and dispersion in the atmosphere [17, 18]. The present study was conducted to analyze the monthly incidence of airborne fungi, seasonal variation, and influence of meteorological parameters in indoor and outdoor fungi of cowshed at Hesaraghatta village, Bangalore.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sampling Site

The cowshed selected for this investigation was situated at Hesaraghatta village in Bangalore, India.


### 2.2. Sampling Time

Indoor and outdoor air samples of cowshed were collected at monthly intervals over a period from January 2011 to December 2011.


### 2.3. Collection of Samples

Andersen two-stage sampler was placed in the center of the cowshed [19], 1.5 meter above the ground level. Malt extract agar was used as sampling medium. Airflow was 28.3 L/min during the sampling and the sampling time is limited to 5 minutes.


### 2.4. Treatment of Samples

The air sampled plates were incubated for 5 to 7 days at room temperature and the identification was based on the detailed study of all the microscopic morphological characters of the fungi and the macroscopic features of their colonies. The results for each stage of the sampler were expressed as colony forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/m3) and total concentration was obtained by adding the CFU/m3 from each plate. Identification of fungal colonies was based on morphological characteristics and microscopic observations with the help of Agharkar Research Institute, Pune (India).


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS windows Microsoft version 16, 2007. Comparison between indoor and outdoor airborne fungi, Pearson’s correlation between meteorological variables tests, one-way ANOVA for CFU, and two-way ANOVA for CFU and season of the cowshed were performed with significance at the 0.05 level 2-tailed.


## 2.1. Sampling Site

The cowshed selected for this investigation was situated at Hesaraghatta village in Bangalore, India.


## 2.2. Sampling Time

Indoor and outdoor air samples of cowshed were collected at monthly intervals over a period from January 2011 to December 2011.


## 2.3. Collection of Samples

Andersen two-stage sampler was placed in the center of the cowshed [19], 1.5 meter above the ground level. Malt extract agar was used as sampling medium. Airflow was 28.3 L/min during the sampling and the sampling time is limited to 5 minutes.


## 2.4. Treatment of Samples

The air sampled plates were incubated for 5 to 7 days at room temperature and the identification was based on the detailed study of all the microscopic morphological characters of the fungi and the macroscopic features of their colonies. The results for each stage of the sampler were expressed as colony forming units per cubic meter of air (CFU/m3) and total concentration was obtained by adding the CFU/m3 from each plate. Identification of fungal colonies was based on morphological characteristics and microscopic observations with the help of Agharkar Research Institute, Pune (India).


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS windows Microsoft version 16, 2007. Comparison between indoor and outdoor airborne fungi, Pearson’s correlation between meteorological variables tests, one-way ANOVA for CFU, and two-way ANOVA for CFU and season of the cowshed were performed with significance at the 0.05 level 2-tailed.


## 3. Results

During the study period, a total number of 15419.04 CFU/m3 was isolated from both indoor and outdoor environment of cowshed, of which indoor 7808.36 CFU/m3 and outdoor 7610.68 CFU/m3 of cowshed contributed (Tables 1 and 2). Altogether 29 species belonging to 13 genera were isolated from indoor and outdoor 26 species belonging to 12 genera isolated, in addition to unidentified fungi.Table 1
Monthly occurrence of fungal spores (CFU/m3) recorded from January 2011 to December 2011 in the indoor air of cowshed.
Sl. number
Genera and species
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Total
%
1
Acremoniumsp.
0
0
7.06
3.53
52.95
0
14.12
31.77
0
49.42
0
3.53
162.38
2.07
2
Alternaria alternata
45.89
63.54
35.3
14.12
31.77
35.3
35.3
21.18
42.36
21.18
42.36
42.36
430.66
5.51
3
Ascomycetessp.
0
0
10.59
3.53
3.53
3.53
3.53
14.12
7.06
21.18
0
0
67.07
0.85
4
Aspergillusspp.
56.48
91.78
49.42
24.71
28.24
35.3
21.18
10.59
45.89
67.07
35.3
35.3
501.26
6.41
5
A. flavus
38.83
98.84
52.95
45.89
98.84
21.18
21.18
31.77
14.12
21.18
10.59
7.06
462.43
5.92
6
A. niger
77.66
63.54
49.42
49.42
24.71
56.48
28.24
56.48
35.3
0
0
35.3
476.55
6.1
7
A. oryzae
7.06
3.53
21.18
38.83
28.24
38.83
17.65
42.36
28.24
21.18
28.24
52.95
328.29
4.2
8
A. ochraceus
0
0
3.53
10.59
0
3.53
3.53
0
7.06
7.06
7.06
7.06
49.42
0.63
9
A. fumigatus
0
0
14.12
21.18
0
0
10.59
24.71
17.65
10.59
0
0
98.84
1.26
10
A. terreus
24.71
17.65
14.12
3.53
3.53
10.59
31.77
7.06
10.59
31.77
28.24
38.83
222.39
2.84
11
Curvulariaspp.
38.83
17.65
14.12
21.18
7.06
0
0
17.65
21.18
0
45.89
35.3
218.86
2.8
12
C. lunata
10.59
0
10.59
3.53
0
10.59
21.18
0
0
49.42
28.24
35.3
169.44
2.16
13
Cladosporiumspp.
63.54
56.48
98.84
81.19
77.66
60.01
28.24
28.24
49.42
35.3
21.18
35.3
635.4
8.13
14
C. cladosporioides
35.3
49.42
21.18
7.06
35.3
49.42
28.24
56.48
49.42
7.06
14.12
42.36
395.36
5.06
15
C. herbarum
0
0
49.42
28.24
35.3
42.36
31.77
10.59
42.36
17.65
0
0
257.69
3.3
16
C. acremonium
7.06
21.18
0
7.06
14.12
14.12
21.18
35.3
7.06
0
0
7.06
134.14
1.71
17
Fusariumspp.
77.66
28.24
60.01
38.83
14.12
17.65
14.12
14.12
14.12
45.89
3.53
10.59
338.88
4.33
18
F. oxysporum
38.83
10.59
42.36
28.24
7.06
0
14.12
7.06
17.65
7.06
21.18
14.12
208.27
2.66
19
F. moniliforme
0
35.3
21.18
42.36
91.78
0
21.18
7.06
0
0
17.65
35.3
271.81
3.48
20
F. solani
14.12
17.65
3.53
10.59
21.18
35.3
56.48
42.36
3.53
14.12
35.3
14.12
268.28
3.43
21
Mucorsp.
38.83
14.12
14.12
21.18
0
21.18
17.65
14.12
14.12
0
14.12
38.83
208.27
2.66
22
Neurosporasp.
0
0
7.06
14.12
10.59
0
0
3.53
14.12
7.06
0
0
56.48
0.72
23
Rhizopussp.
21.18
35.3
14.12
45.89
42.36
3.53
10.59
28.24
42.36
24.71
14.12
35.3
317.7
4.06
24
Penicilliumspp.
49.42
17.65
35.3
24.71
42.36
17.65
21.18
42.36
3.53
21.18
28.24
31.77
335.35
4.29
25
P. versicolor
31.77
31.77
14.12
21.18
14.12
14.12
42.36
3.53
35.3
7.06
24.71
17.65
257.69
3.3
26
P. citrinum
14.12
21.18
21.18
38.83
21.18
21.18
7.06
7.06
35.3
14.12
35.3
14.12
250.63
3.2
27
P. nigricans
0
3.53
7.06
14.12
14.12
31.77
38.83
38.83
24.71
10.59
0
0
183.56
2.35
28
Scopulariopsissp.
7.06
3.53
0
0
0
0
7.06
7.06
3.53
3.53
0
0
31.77
0.4
29
Trichodermasp.
14.12
35.3
7.06
14.12
24.71
24.71
45.89
7.06
7.06
7.06
14.12
49.42
250.63
3.2
30
Unidentified
42.36
35.3
10.59
0
35.3
7.06
31.77
17.65
7.06
24.71
7.06
0
218.86
2.8
Total
755.42
773.07
709.53
677.76
780.13
575.39
645.99
628.34
600.1
547.15
476.55
638.93
7808.36
100Table 2
Monthly occurrence of fungal spores (CFU/m3) recorded from January 2011 to December 2011 in the outdoor air of cowshed.
Sl. number
Genera and species
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Total
%
1
Acremoniumsp.
0
0
24.71
21.18
35.3
31.77
24.71
52.95
31.77
88.25
0
0
310.64
4.08
2
Alternaria alternata
77.66
88.25
52.95
35.3
95.31
112.96
91.78
45.89
60.01
74.13
70.6
21.18
826.02
10.85
3
Ascomycetessp.
0
0
42.36
35.3
21.18
45.89
38.83
49.42
31.77
56.48
0
0
321.23
4.22
4
Aspergillusspp.
112.96
95.31
74.13
56.48
49.42
70.6
38.83
31.77
35.3
74.13
102.37
74.13
815.43
10.71
5
A. flavus
10.59
35.3
21.18
24.71
24.71
38.83
0
0
0
0
31.77
14.12
201.21
2.64
6
A. niger
0
0
10.59
14.12
0
10.59
28.24
24.71
7.06
14.12
0
0
109.43
1.43
7
A. oryzae
14.12
28.24
7.06
14.12
24.71
7.06
10.59
10.59
7.06
17.65
42.36
35.3
218.86
2.87
8
A. fumigatus
21.18
24.71
28.24
49.42
7.06
7.06
17.65
28.24
24.71
24.71
14.12
24.71
271.81
3.57
9
A. terreus
3.53
0
14.12
24.71
0
7.06
3.53
0
0
0
3.53
17.65
74.13
0.97
10
Curvulariaspp.
14.12
7.06
21.18
7.06
3.53
14.12
0
24.71
35.3
35.3
14.12
3.53
180.03
2.36
11
C. lunata
0
0
0
0
0
17.65
28.24
35.3
3.53
14.12
7.06
24.71
130.61
1.71
12
Cladosporiumspp.
70.6
70.6
98.84
52.95
49.42
60.01
17.65
31.77
7.06
7.06
10.59
77.66
554.21
7.28
13
C. cladosporioides
7.06
3.53
35.3
7.06
45.89
14.12
24.71
38.83
10.59
10.59
10.59
24.71
232.98
3.06
14
C. herbarum
0
0
45.89
3.53
28.24
31.77
7.06
14.12
10.59
28.24
0
0
169.44
2.22
15
C. acremonium
31.77
10.59
35.3
28.24
3.53
31.77
63.54
28.24
21.18
0
0
0
254.16
3.33
16
Fusariumspp.
91.78
38.83
35.3
14.12
28.24
38.83
0
0
0
0
17.65
10.59
275.34
3.61
17
F. oxysporum
10.59
7.06
17.65
3.53
7.06
0
7.06
0
28.24
7.06
35.3
7.06
130.61
1.71
18
F. moniliforme
7.06
7.06
10.59
45.89
63.54
10.59
31.77
0
10.59
35.3
24.71
28.24
275.34
3.61
19
F. solani
0
0
31.77
31.77
35.3
24.71
17.65
24.71
10.59
21.18
49.42
31.77
278.87
3.66
20
Mucorsp.
14.12
28.24
28.24
35.3
17.65
60.01
35.3
38.83
0
10.59
28.24
45.89
342.41
4.49
21
Rhizopussp.
35.3
38.83
24.71
7.06
14.12
28.24
10.59
21.18
24.71
10.59
14.12
7.06
236.51
3.1
22
Penicilliumspp.
81.19
67.07
49.42
0
10.59
10.59
21.18
10.59
7.06
7.06
17.65
42.36
324.76
4.26
23
P. versicolor
10.59
14.12
3.53
10.59
0
3.53
10.59
3.53
28.24
14.12
28.24
31.77
158.85
2.08
24
P. citrinum
28.24
35.3
17.65
21.18
14.12
42.36
35.3
24.71
35.3
14.12
7.06
14.12
289.46
3.8
25
Scopulariopsissp.
7.06
14.12
0
0
0
0
14.12
7.06
3.53
7.06
14.12
0
67.07
0.88
26
Trichodermasp.
28.24
45.89
35.3
21.18
28.24
35.3
56.48
10.59
21.18
7.06
14.12
28.24
331.82
4.35
27
Unidentified
38.83
24.71
24.71
7.06
3.53
28.24
14.12
38.83
14.12
10.59
14.12
10.59
229.45
3.01
Total
716.59
684.82
790.72
571.86
610.69
783.66
649.52
596.57
469.49
589.51
571.86
575.39
7610.68
100Among the total number of isolated fungal species from indoorAspergillus (27.36%) was represented by 6 species, namely,A. flavus,A. niger,A. oryzae,A. ochraceus,A. fumigatus, andA. terreus, followed by 3 species ofCladosporium (18.2%), namely,C. cladosporioides,C. herbarium, andC. acremonium; 3 species ofFusarium(13.9%), namely,F. oxysporum,F. moniliforme, andF. solani; 3 species ofPenicillium (13.14%), namely,P. versicolor,P. citrinum, andP. nigricans; and 1 species ofCurvularia (4.07%), namely,C. lunata, along withAcremonium sp. (2.07%),Alternaria alternata (5.51%),Ascomycetes sp. (0.85%),Mucor sp. (2.66%),Neurospora sp. (0.72%),Rhizopus sp. (4.06%),Scopulariopsis sp. (0.4%), andTrichoderma sp. (3.2%) which are presented in Table 1. When these findings were compared with outdoorAspergillus (22.19%) was represented by 5 species, namely,A. flavus,A. niger,A. oryzae,A. fumigatus, andA. terreus, followed by 3 species ofCladosporium (15.89%), namely,C. cladosporioides,C. herbarium, andC. acremonium; 3 species ofFusarium (12.59%), namely,F. oxysporum,F. moniliforme, andF. solani; 2 species ofPenicillium (10.14%), namely,P. versicolor andP. citrinum; and 1 species ofCurvularia (4.07%), namely,C. lunata, along withAcremonium sp. (4.08%),Alternaria alternata (10.85%),Ascomycetes sp. (4.22%),Mucor sp. (4.99%),Rhizopus sp. (3.1%),Scopulariopsis sp. (0.88%), andTrichoderma sp. (4.35%) which are presented in Table 2. It was observed that all the fungal genera and species remain the same, with variation in their percentage occurrence, but few of the fungal species likeA. ochraceus,Neurospora sp., andP. nigricans were found in the indoor environment of the cowshed.Based on comparative analysis, the dominant fungal species in indoor of cowshed wereCladosporium (8.13%),Aspergillus (6.41%), andAspergillus niger(6.1%) butScopulariopsis (0.4%) andAspergillus ochraceus (0.63%) were the least recorded (Table 1) but in outdoor the dominant fungal species wereAlternaria alternata(10.85%) andAspergillus (10.71%) whileScopulariopsis(0.88%) andAspergillus terreus (0.97%) were the least recorded (Table 2). Monthly variation of cowshed total fungal spores in indoor showed maximum spore distribution in May (780.13 CFU/m3) followed by February (773.07 CFU/m3) and January (755.42 CFU/m3) and outdoor showed the highest distribution during March (790.72 CFU/m3) followed by June (783.66 CFU/m3) and January (716.59 CFU/m3) when compared to other months of the year.Seasonal occurrence of fungal spores in both indoor and outdoor air of cowshed (Table3) revealed almost similar percentages of fungal spores in the respective seasons studied. During summer season, maximum spores were recorded 2742.81 CFU/m3 followed by winter 2643.97 CFU/m3 and rainy 2421.58 CFU/m3 in indoor. For outdoor, summer season contributed maximum 2756.93 CFU/m3, followed by winter 2548.66 CFU/m3 and rainy 2305.09 CFU/m3 season. Over all, maximum spore formation due to the abundance ofAspergillus flavus (218.86 CFU/m3) was observed during summer season, followed by winter season with maximum occurrence ofAspergillus spp. (218.86 CFU/m3) and in rainy seasonCladosporium spp. (141.20 CFU/m3) were recorded.Table 3
Seasonal variations of indoor and outdoor fungal spores (CFU/m3) recorded from January 2011 to December 2011 of cowshed.
Sl. number
Genera and species
Indoor
Outdoor
Summer
Rainy
Winter
Summer
Rainy
Winter
1
Acremoniumsp.
63.54
95.31
3.53
112.96
197.68
0
2
Alternaria alternata
116.49
120.02
194.15
296.52
271.81
257.69
3
Ascomycetessp.
21.18
45.89
0
144.73
176.5
0
4
Aspergillusspp.
137.67
144.73
218.86
250.63
180.03
384.77
5
A. flavus
218.86
88.25
155.32
109.43
0
91.78
6
A. niger
180.03
120.02
176.5
35.3
74.13
0
7
A. oryzae
127.08
109.43
91.78
52.95
45.89
120.02
8
A. ochraceus
17.65
17.65
14.12
0
0
0
9
A. fumigatus
35.3
63.54
0
91.78
95.31
84.72
10
A. terreus
31.77
81.19
109.43
45.89
3.53
24.71
11
Curvulariaspp.
42.36
38.83
137.67
45.89
95.31
38.83
12
C. lunata
24.71
70.6
74.13
17.65
81.19
31.77
13
Cladosporiumspp.
317.7
141.2
176.5
261.22
63.54
229.45
14
C. cladosporioides
112.96
141.2
141.2
102.37
84.72
45.89
15
C. herbarum
155.32
102.37
0
109.43
60.01
0
16
C. acremonium
35.3
63.54
35.3
98.84
112.96
42.36
17
Fusariumspp.
130.61
88.25
120.02
116.49
0
158.85
18
F. oxysporum
77.66
45.89
84.72
28.24
42.36
60.01
19
F. moniliforme
155.32
28.24
88.25
130.61
77.66
67.07
20
F. solani
70.6
116.49
81.19
123.55
74.13
81.19
21
Mucorsp.
56.48
45.89
105.9
141.2
84.72
116.49
22
Neurosporasp.
31.77
24.71
0
0
0
0
23
Rhizopussp.
105.9
105.9
105.9
74.13
67.07
95.31
24
Penicilliumspp.
120.02
88.25
127.08
70.6
45.89
208.27
25
P. versicolor
63.54
88.25
105.9
17.65
56.48
84.72
26
P. citrinum
102.37
63.54
84.72
95.31
109.43
84.72
27
P. nigricans
67.07
112.96
3.53
0
0
0
28
Scopulariopsissp.
0
21.18
10.59
0
31.77
35.3
29
Trichodermasp.
70.6
67.07
112.96
120.02
95.31
116.49
30
Unidentified
52.95
81.19
84.72
63.54
77.66
88.25
Total
2742.81
2421.58
2643.97
2756.93
2305.09
2548.66Distribution of CFU varied with meteorological factors (Figure1); at higher temperature of more than 32°C, the total CFU’s distribution was slightly more during March 709.53 CFU/m3 reached maximum in their CFU’s, when the temperature was less than 26°C, the CFU’s reduced between November 476.55 CFU/m3. The high relative humidity from June to September (94%) reduced the distribution of organisms (2449.82 CFU/m3). The CFU gradually increased to 2915.78 CFU/m3 with less relative humidity (85%) between the months of January and April. In the present study, the wind speed showed less impact on the distribution of CFU with less variation in their CFU. Almost during the months from May to October with wind speed of 9 km/h or higher, the distribution of organisms seems to be less (3777.10 CFU/m3), and at less wind speed from the months of November to April (4.5 km/h) the organism number was more with 4031.26 CFU/m3. During the maximum rainfall in the month of August (253.2 mm) distribution of organism was 628.34 CFU/m3, but during January 755.42 CFU/m3 and March 709.53 CFU/m3 though there was no rainfall, the total organism distribution became higher during these periods.Distribution of the fungal spores (CFU/m3) and meteorological parameters recorded.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)The correlation of coefficient between meteorological parameters like temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and rainfall with cowshed fungal CFU collected during the sampling time showed significance at different concentration levels (Table4). Comparisons of Pearson’s correlation between meteorological variables of the cowshed CFU and relative humidity are significantly negatively correlated (Table 5). One-way ANOVA for CFU of the cowshed between variations and within variations was not statistically significant in CFU for both groups when subjected to the same conditions for the entire year (Table 6). Analysis of the two-way ANOVA for CFU and season of the cowshed showed no significant difference in CFU’s growth between indoor and outdoor cowshed colonies over the different months (Table 7).Table 4
Comparison between indoor and outdoor air of cowshed.
Variables
Indoor
Outdoor
Concentration
6.51
±
0.94
6.34
±
0.95
Temperature
23.27
±
1.99
23.27
±
1.99
Relative humidity
67.32
±
7.28
67.32
±
7.28
Wind speed
5.43
±
1.60
5.43
±
1.60
Rain fall
67.04
±
73.71
67.04
±
73.71Table 5
Pearson’s correlation between meteorological variables of cowshed.
Linear correlation table
Conc.
T
RH
WS
RF
Concentration
1.000
Temperature
0.053
1.000
Relative humidity
−0.503
−0.408
1.000
Wind speed
0.129
0.141
0.268
1.000
Rain fall
−0.249
0.345
0.191
0.095
1.000Table 6
One-way ANOVA for CFU of cowshed.
One-way ANOVA table
Sum of squares
Degrees of freedom
Mean squares
F-ratio
P value
Between variation
0.16
1
0.16
0.18
0.67
Within variation
19.55
22
0.88
Total variation
19.72
23Table 7
Two-way ANOVA for CFU and season of the cowshed.
Two-way ANOVA table
Sum of squares
Degrees of freedom
Mean squares
F-ratio
P value
Colony
0.04
1
0.04
2.65
0.24
Season
0.94
2
0.47
30.83
0.03
Error
0.03
2
0.01
Total
1.01
5


## 4. Discussion

This study revealed that a great variety of fungal spores constitute the airborne fungal spores of the cowshed at Hesaraghatta village, Bangalore. During the survey period, indoor (7808.36 CFU/m3) and outdoor (7610.68 CFU/m3) were counted from cowshed environment. More fungal growth was observed at the cowshed. They were Acremonium sp.,Alternaria alternata,Ascomycetes sp.,Aspergillus sp.,A. flavus,A. niger,A. oryzae,A. ochraceus,A. fumigatus,A. terreus,Curvularia sp.,C. lunata,Cladosporium sp.,C. cladosporioides,C. herbarum,C. acremonium,Fusarium sp.,F. oxysporum,F. moniliforme,F. solani,Mucor sp.,Neurospora sp.,Rhizopus sp.,Penicillium sp.,P. versicolor,P. citrinum,P. nigricans,Scopulariopsis sp., andTrichoderma sp., were recorded Similar airborne and closely related fungal assem-blages have been recorded [20].The predominant airborne fungi wereCladosporium sp.,Aspergillus sp.,Aspergillus niger, andAlternaria alternata. Most cowshed investigations have reportedAlternaria alternata,Aspergillus, andCladosporium as the predominant fungal species. Sing [21] reported indoor air fungal flora of a cowshed using Andersen air sampler, out of 8448.3 CFU/m3 identified asAspergillus,Cladosporium,Curvularia,Penicillium species, and so forth, were most commonly isolated types. Adhikari et al. [12] recorded 29 airborne fungal spores from the rural cowshed and a total of 24 from the suburban area. In both places, a relatively high frequency ofCladosporium sp.,Aspergillussp.,Alternaria alternata,Penicilliumspecies, and some unidentified fungi was recorded. In addition, skin prick tests were performed by them with antigenic extracts prepared from the most culture of fungi on people who were either occupationally involved are used to visit the sheds, which revealed instances of high levels of allergenicity. Adhikari et al. [22] recorded 31 fungal spore types and 35 types of viable CFUs using Andersen two-stage viable sampler.Factors such as building dampness, indoor temperature, relative humidity, and hygiene conditions indoors and in the surrounding environment favour the growth and proliferation of fungi including the pathogenic species [23]. There is clinical evidence that exposure to mould and other dampness-related microbial agents increases the risk of rare conditions such as hypersensitivity, pneumonitis, allergic alveolitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and allergic fungal sinusitis [24]. This could be because of improper management of the indoor environment and poor ventilation. In the naturally continuous mixing of indoor and outdoor air, the concentration of fungi can be two to five times higher than the outdoor level [25]. However, the spore concentration has been observed to be much lower in outdoor (control) environment. Because many people spend as much as 90% of their time indoors, the health risk of indoor air pollutants is of critical public health concern. Studies have shown association between reported indoor dampness and health outcomes, including respiratory symptoms, headache, and upper respiratory airway infections [26].The total spore concentration and CFU in cowshed were observed during various seasons, which revealed that indoor and outdoor higher total spore and CFU concentration levels were maximum in summer season followed by winter season and then rainy season. The possible reason could be due to the vigorous growth of plant in summer simultaneously allowing the growth of airborne fungi along with increased temperature and therefore favoring fungal growth [27]. The winter season in India belongs to the months between November and February, summer between March and June, and rainy between July and October. The CFU/m3 growth for cowshed was the lowest during the rainy season when the temperature was around 23°C. The reason could be due to the washing of fungal air spores from the atmosphere due to precipitation. Immediately after rainy seasons, the CFU/m3 increases since there was an increase in temperature and abundance in dead plant material favoring the spore relation conditions for fungi, and ventilation was also inadequate there. Such observations have been recorded by investigation carried out by Aydogdu and Asan [28].The differences in cowshed were observed with respect to the CFU’s and spore concentrations of individual fungal types with average monthly concentrations, but no significant difference was observed when the total overall yearly concentrations were considered. The possible reason might be the insignificant changes of environmental factors as well as the fungal growth substrates at the cowshed during the one-year sampling. It is an established fact that temperature and relative humidity are two important factors for fungal spore generation, release, and dispersal, particularly in indoor environments [29, 30]. Higher temperature and relative humidity in the months of rainy season and associated higher concentration of culturable fungal spores in the cowshed are supporting the observations of earlier researchers. The dominance ofAspergillus,Penicillium, andCladosporium in all monitored locations was in agreement with Shelton et al. [31], who reported that these were the dominant culturable airborne fungi in indoor buildings in United States and elsewhere. There were also reports thatAspergillus can be used as an indicator for fungal contamination in buildings [32]. According to Nielsen [33],Aspergillus,Penicillium,Fusarium,Alternaria, andTrichoderma are the most frequently found fungal genera indoor and some species of these genera are main mycotoxin producers that can cause mycotoxicoses. This toxic response sometime leads to deterioration of liver or kidney functions if ingested by humans through food [34].A series of fungal treatments and other remediation steps were carried out to improve conditions that were favorable for the establishment and growth of the fungi. During the treatment, special clothing with rubber gloves and mask was used to protect the skin and eyes. Besides, high efficiency particulate air respirators were used during the fungal treatment. The effectiveness of the treatment was proven by the decreasing numbers of CFU during air sampling. Although most fungi have periods of the year when their spores are more prevalent than others, some can be found virtually all year round. Concentration of fungal spores in outdoor environments is usually high, especially during the rainy season. Although many spore types are washed from the atmosphere during rainfall, other spore types only occur in rainy weather. The air is abundant of fungal spores although it is not a good medium for growth unlike the soil, water, surfaces of living organisms, and nonliving materials.


## 5. Conclusion

This study was carried out in the animal rearing houses; it clearly revealed the concentration of different fungal species in the environment. The data of fungal spore content in indoor and outdoor environment helped us to prepare the fungal spore calendar on this region. The seasonal periodicity information of the major allergenic spores will be valuable for susceptible patients to take respiratory protection measures during the peak time. The fungal spore calendar and prediction model will be helpful to forecast the allergenic fungal spore load in the air of Hesaraghatta village. Respiratory allergic problems and hospital admission with relevant diseases of that zone are related to the presence of airborne allergenic fungal spores.



---

*Source: 985921-2014-09-16.xml*