# Effect of Pretreatment with Sulfuric Acid on Catalytic Hydrocracking of Fe/AC Catalysts

Authors: Ruiyu Wang; Fei Wang; Ling Liu
Journal: Journal of Spectroscopy
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

Activated carbon (AC) was modified by H2SO4 and used as a support for catalyst. The Fe2S3/AC-T catalyst was prepared by deposition-precipitation method and used to catalyze hydrocracking of coal-related model compound, di(1-naphthyl)methane (DNM). The properties of catalyst were studied by N2 adsorption-desorption, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy. The result showed that ferric sulfate and acidic centers had synergetic effect on hydrocracking of DNM when using Fe2S3/AC-T as catalyst, the optimal loading of Fe is 9 wt.%. Hydroconversion of the extraction residue from Guizhou bituminous coal was also studied using Fe2S3/AC-T as the catalyst. The reaction was conducted in cyclohexane under 0.8 Mpa of initial hydrogen pressure at 310°C. The reaction mixture was extracted with petroleum ether and analyzed by GC/MS. Amounts of organic compounds which fall into the categories of homologues of benzene and naphthalene were detected. It suggested that the catalyst could effectively catalyze the cleavage of C-C-bridged bonds.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

As an important chemical process, direct coal liquefaction (DCL) could be a feasible option to directly convert coals into liquid fuels or chemicals [1, 2]. Nowadays, rapid decrease of petroleum stresses the importance of coals for covering the shortage of organic chemical feedstock [3, 4]. Compared to the existing DCL performed at high temperatures, low-temperature DCL should be more promising in consideration of the fact that the formation of gaseous products and coke can be considerably reduced at low temperatures [5–7].Catalyst is one of key issues in DCL process. Considerable efforts [8–15] have been contributed to the catalytic performances of metal-based (Fe and Ni) catalysts for DCL or to the reactions of coal-related model compounds. It is generally accepted that catalysts can significantly promote coal pyrolysis by reducing the pyrolysis activation energy and the formation of active hydrogen atoms (AHAs) by facilitating H2 dissociation [16, 17]. The cleavage of C-C bridged bonds in coals, which is very important for DCL, begins with the secondary distribution of AHAs in the whole reaction system [9, 15, 17]. Iron sulfides are commonly used catalyst for DCL because of their easy availability. By literatures [18, 19], FeS2 thermolysis to Fe1-xS and FeS2 regenerated from the reaction of Fe1-xS with H2S facilitates the continuous formation of AHAs. In another word, the cycle of FeS2 decomposition and regeneration contributes to its catalysis in the reactions of DCL.Although the iron-based catalysts are successfully used in industrial processes of DCL, their efficiency is still quite low. Solid acids are commonly catalyst for cracking reactions, and the corresponding acidic sites are active for the cleavage of C-C-bridged bonds [12–14, 20, 21]. If combined with acidic centers, the Fe-based catalyst could exhibit an improved catalytic performance in DCL process. Therefore, we prepared an iron sulfide-supported catalyst, the activated carbon (AC) which was modified by H2SO4 was used as support, and the catalysts were used to catalyze hydrocracking of a coal-related model compound (DNM) and hydroconversion of the extraction residue of a bituminous coal.


## 2. Experiments

### 2.1. Preparation of Catalyst

Guizhou bituminous coal (GBC) was collected from Guizhou province, China. It was pulverized to pass a 200-mesh sieve followed by desiccation in a vacuum oven at 80°C before use. All of chemical reagents used in the experiments are commercially obtained.3 g activated carbon (AC) was placed in a beaker, and 10 mL H2SO4 (2 mol/L) was added. The mixture was disposed by ultrasound by placing the beaker into an ultrasonic oscillator for 3 min and then kept overnight. The obtained mixture was dried under drier at 80°C for 6 h. The product obtained was denoted as AC-T (T means treated carrier), and the corresponding amount of acid was 2.0 mmol/g, which was measured via neutral drip reaction with NaOH solution.A certain amount of Fe2(SO4)3 (0.34 g, 0.59 g, 0.86 g, 1.16 g, and 1.48 g) and the corresponding amount of Na2S·9H2O (0.612 g, 1.602 g, 1.55 g, 2.09 g, and 2.66 g) were dissolved in 50 mL deionized water, respectively. Under stirring, both the Na2S and Fe2(SO4)3 aqueous solution were continuously dropped to 10 mL deionized water at the same rate. When the reactions were completed, the 3 g AC-T support was added. The mixture was kept stirring for 10 min followed by filtration, and the filter cake was dried at 100°C for 2 h. The product obtained was calcined at 300°C and held at the temperature for 2 h under a protection of N2 flow. The obtained catalyst was denoted as Fe2S3/AC-T(x), where x represents the weight percentage of Fe in catalyst.For unmodified AC as support, the catalyst prepared at the same conditions was denoted as Fe2S3/AC.


### 2.2. Characterization of Catalyst

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured with a Bayer BELSORP-max instrument. Specific surface area (SSA), total pore volume (TPV), and average pore diameter (APD) of the samples were calculated from the isotherms via t-plot, BJH, and HK methods, respectively. Morphology of the samples and the corresponding elemental distribution on the surface were characterized using a FEI Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The X-ray diffraction pattern was recorded on a Burker D8 ADVANCE diffractometer with a scanning rate of 4°/min at 2θ of 10 to 80°, using a Cu ka radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA.


### 2.3. Di(1-naphthyl)methane Hydrocracking

Di(1-naphthyl)methane (DNM, 1 mmol), catalyst (0.4 g), and cyclohexane (30 mL) were put into a 60 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing the air with hydrogen for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 0.8 MPa and heated to an indicated temperature in 15 min. Under stirring at a rate of 200 r/m, the reaction was conducted for 1 h. Then the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath. The gaseous reaction mixture was taken out from the autoclave and quantified using a gas chromatography (9790, Zhejiang Fuli, China).


### 2.4. GBC Residue Hydroconversion

2 g GBC and 50 mL acetone were put into a 100 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing air for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 5 MPa with nitrogen and heated to 310°C within 15 min. The autoclave was cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath after being kept at 310°C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was taken out and filtered through a 0.8μm membrane filter, and the residue from GBC (RGBC) was dried in vacuum at 80°C for 6 h.The RGBC (1 g), Fe2S3/AC-T catalyst (0.5 g), and cyclohexane (50 mL) were put into a 100 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing air for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 0.8 MPa with hydrogen, heated to 310°C within 15 min, and kept at the temperature for 1 h. Then the autoclave was immediately cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath. The reaction mixture was taken out from the autoclave using petrol ether as the rinse solvent and filtered through a 0.8 μm membrane filter. The filtrate was concentrated by evaporating the solvents using a rotary evaporator and then analyzed with a Hewlett–Packard 6890/5973 GC/MS.


## 2.1. Preparation of Catalyst

Guizhou bituminous coal (GBC) was collected from Guizhou province, China. It was pulverized to pass a 200-mesh sieve followed by desiccation in a vacuum oven at 80°C before use. All of chemical reagents used in the experiments are commercially obtained.3 g activated carbon (AC) was placed in a beaker, and 10 mL H2SO4 (2 mol/L) was added. The mixture was disposed by ultrasound by placing the beaker into an ultrasonic oscillator for 3 min and then kept overnight. The obtained mixture was dried under drier at 80°C for 6 h. The product obtained was denoted as AC-T (T means treated carrier), and the corresponding amount of acid was 2.0 mmol/g, which was measured via neutral drip reaction with NaOH solution.A certain amount of Fe2(SO4)3 (0.34 g, 0.59 g, 0.86 g, 1.16 g, and 1.48 g) and the corresponding amount of Na2S·9H2O (0.612 g, 1.602 g, 1.55 g, 2.09 g, and 2.66 g) were dissolved in 50 mL deionized water, respectively. Under stirring, both the Na2S and Fe2(SO4)3 aqueous solution were continuously dropped to 10 mL deionized water at the same rate. When the reactions were completed, the 3 g AC-T support was added. The mixture was kept stirring for 10 min followed by filtration, and the filter cake was dried at 100°C for 2 h. The product obtained was calcined at 300°C and held at the temperature for 2 h under a protection of N2 flow. The obtained catalyst was denoted as Fe2S3/AC-T(x), where x represents the weight percentage of Fe in catalyst.For unmodified AC as support, the catalyst prepared at the same conditions was denoted as Fe2S3/AC.


## 2.2. Characterization of Catalyst

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured with a Bayer BELSORP-max instrument. Specific surface area (SSA), total pore volume (TPV), and average pore diameter (APD) of the samples were calculated from the isotherms via t-plot, BJH, and HK methods, respectively. Morphology of the samples and the corresponding elemental distribution on the surface were characterized using a FEI Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope (SEM) coupled with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The X-ray diffraction pattern was recorded on a Burker D8 ADVANCE diffractometer with a scanning rate of 4°/min at 2θ of 10 to 80°, using a Cu ka radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA.


## 2.3. Di(1-naphthyl)methane Hydrocracking

Di(1-naphthyl)methane (DNM, 1 mmol), catalyst (0.4 g), and cyclohexane (30 mL) were put into a 60 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing the air with hydrogen for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 0.8 MPa and heated to an indicated temperature in 15 min. Under stirring at a rate of 200 r/m, the reaction was conducted for 1 h. Then the autoclave was cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath. The gaseous reaction mixture was taken out from the autoclave and quantified using a gas chromatography (9790, Zhejiang Fuli, China).


## 2.4. GBC Residue Hydroconversion

2 g GBC and 50 mL acetone were put into a 100 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing air for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 5 MPa with nitrogen and heated to 310°C within 15 min. The autoclave was cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath after being kept at 310°C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was taken out and filtered through a 0.8μm membrane filter, and the residue from GBC (RGBC) was dried in vacuum at 80°C for 6 h.The RGBC (1 g), Fe2S3/AC-T catalyst (0.5 g), and cyclohexane (50 mL) were put into a 100 mL stainless, magnetically stirred autoclave. After replacing air for 3 times, the autoclave was pressurized to 0.8 MPa with hydrogen, heated to 310°C within 15 min, and kept at the temperature for 1 h. Then the autoclave was immediately cooled to room temperature in an ice-water bath. The reaction mixture was taken out from the autoclave using petrol ether as the rinse solvent and filtered through a 0.8 μm membrane filter. The filtrate was concentrated by evaporating the solvents using a rotary evaporator and then analyzed with a Hewlett–Packard 6890/5973 GC/MS.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Figure1 shows the dependence of DNM conversion on the Fe loading of Fe2S3/AC-T. At 270°C, the conversion rate of DNM over Fe2S3/AC-T with various Fe loading was below 1%. When the reaction temperature increased to 290 or 310°C, with the increases of Fe loading (3% to 9%), the DNM conversion rate increased and reached a maximum of 13.5% at 290°C and 19.3% at 310°C. With further increase of Fe loading, the DNM conversion rate decreased to 9% at 290°C and 13% at 310°C. The results indicated that 9% of Fe loading is appropriate for the catalyst and excessive ferric sulfide may result in a decrease of specific surface area, which in turn reduce the catalytic efficiency. The hydrocracking of DNM is an endothermic reaction, and higher temperature is favorable for the reaction. It can be seen in Figure 1 that a high DNM conversion was got under a mild condition (reaction temperature of 310°C).Figure 1
Effect of Fe loading on DNM conversion rate.The catalytic activities of the catalysts Fe2S3/AC (9) and Fe2S3/AC-T (9) were compared in Figure 2, which summarizes the DNM conversions under different reaction temperatures. At 250°C, the DNM conversion was close to zero. As the reaction temperature rised to 270°C, the DNM conversion over Fe2S3/AC (9) and Fe2S3/AC-T (9) were 1.12% and 1.9%, respectively. With further increase of reaction temperature to 290°C, the DNM conversion increased greatly, 7.85% over Fe2S3/AC (9) and 13.5% over Fe2S3/AC-T (9), respectively. At 310°C, the DNM conversion reached 12.4% and 19.3% over Fe2S3/AC (9) and Fe2S3/AC-T (9), respectively.Figure 2
DNM conversion rates with two kinds of catalysts at different temperatures.It is believed that the H2S species, generated by ferric sulfate and hydrogen gas under enhanced temperature and pressure, further react with the C-C-bridged bonds of DNM to form naphthalene and methyl naphthalene. In our study, the support AC-T was obtained by impregnating the AC to sulfuric acid solution, and the catalyst Fe2S3/AC-T was coated with a layer of acid sites. The acid sites are helpful to the cleavage of C-C-bridged bonds. The catalyst Fe2S3/AC-T was more active than the Fe2S3/AC, which could be ascribed to the synergy effects of ferric sulfate and acid sites in the catalyst.N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of supports and catalysts are shown in Figure 3. Those of AC, AC-T, Fe2S3/AC-T (7) and Fe2S3/AC-T (9) exhibited a mixture of type and type isotherms, with a wider knee exhibited at relative pressure (p/p0) < 0.1. This indicated wider micropores. An obvious capillary condensation step (hysteresis loop) at p/p0 > 0.4 indicated that a considerable amount of mesoporous was also present. Mesopore- and micropore-size distributions are shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), respectively, and the specific surface area, total pore volume, and pore diameter of the support AC and the catalyst Fe2S3/AC-T are listed in Table 1. It can be seen that AC has a high specific surface area and a high percentage of micropores and the pore-size distribution was predominantly 0.5–0.8 nm. After treated by sulfuric acid, the specific surface area and total volume of AC-T decreased about 30% and 18%, respectively. The micropore size becomes nonuniform and has a wide range of distribution. Compare to the support AC-T, the Fe2S3/AC-T catalysts have a significantly higher specific surface area and total pore volume. It may be ascribed to the loose structure of ferric sulfate on the support. A certain amount of micropores was also formed during impregnation. The values of specific surface area and total pore volume reach the maximum at the Fe loading of 9 wt.%. Combined with the catalytic performance exhibited in Figures 1 and 2, the optimal loading of Fe is 9 wt.%.Figure 3
N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of supports and catalysts.Figure 4
Micropore-size distribution (a) and mesopore-size distribution (b) of carriers and catalysts.
(a)
(b)Table 1
The surface properties of AC support and the catalysts.
Samples
SSA (m2/g)
TPV (cm3/g)
V mic (cm3/g)
D
BJH (nm)
D
HK (nm)
AC
1485.7
0.8625
0.7259
2.3221
0.5875
AC-T
1017
0.691
0.5264
2.7178
0.51
Fe2S3/AC-T (7)
1465.7
0.9389
0.7538
2.5623
0.5375
Fe2S3/AC-T (9)
1508.1
0.9581
0.7654
2.5412
0.6125The XRD patterns of the catalyst Fe2S3/AC-T with different ferric sulfate loading are shown in Figure 5. The broad diffraction peak showed between 2θ = 20~30° is ascribed to the support AC. It is obvious that the catalyst only exhibited the diffraction peak of support AC. The absence of diffraction peaks of ferric substance can be ascribed to its well dispersion on the AC surface.Figure 5
XRD patterns of the catalysts.As Figure6 displays, the surface of AC support is smooth, and the surface of catalyst Fe2S3/AC-T (9) is rough. There are irregular bulks adhered to the AC surface. Combined with the XRD results, the bulks of ferric sulfate are well dispersed on the AC surface.Figure 6
SEM images of AC (a) and Fe2S3/AC-T (b).
(a)
(b)Total ion chromatogram of the filtrate of reaction mixture from catalytic hydroconversion of RGBC is shown in Figure7. 18 compounds were identified and listed in Table 2. Five arenes and 13 alkanes were identified. It indicated that the Fe2S3/AC-T significantly catalyzed the hydroconversion of RGBC and forms GC/MS-detectable species.Figure 7
Total ion chromatogram of the filtrate of reaction mixture.Table 2
The compounds detected in the reaction mixture.
Peaks
RT (min)
Compounds
Arenes
1
7.63
1,2,3-Trimethyl-benzene
2
9.27
1,2,3,4-Tetramethyl-benzene
3
9.7
1,2,3,4-Tetrahydro-naphthalene
4
9.98
Naphthalene
6
11.23
2-Methyl-naphthalene
Alkane
5
11.04
Bicyclohexyl
7
11.64
Tetradecane
8
12.09
1-Cyclohexylmethyl-4-methyl-cyclohexane
9, 16
12.16
2,6,10-Trimethyl-dodecane
10
12.48
Tridecane
11
13.27
Hexadecane
12
13.64
5-Ethyl-decane5
13, 19
14.03
Octadecane
14
14.06
2,6,10-Trimethyl-pentadecane
15, 18
14.75
Eicosane
17
15.44
Pentadecane
20
22.68
Nonadecane


## 4. Conclusions

Ascribed to the synergy effects of ferric sulfate and acid sites, the Fe2S3/AC-T exhibited a benign catalytic performance for DNM hydrocracking.The Fe2S3/AC-T significantly catalyzed the hydroconversion of RGBC and forms GC/MS-detectable species. Five arenes and 13 alkanes were identified in the filtrate of reaction mixture.



---

*Source: 9860619-2017-12-01.xml*