# CD73 (NT5E) Promotes the Proliferation and Metastasis of Lung Adenocarcinoma through the EGFR/AKT/mTOR Pathway

Authors: Hong Zhang; Yu Cao; Jianming Tang; Rui Wang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. Lung cancer is the most common malignant tumor and the main cause of tumor-related death globally. As the 5-year survival rate of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains low, it is necessary to investigate novel molecular markers and therapeutic targets for LUAD. Materials and Methods. The protein expression of CD73 (NT5E) in LUAD specimens was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blot analysis were used to analyze the mRNA and protein expression levels of several genes in LUAD cells. The proliferation of LUAD cells was evaluated using proliferation and colony formation assays and apoptosis analysis. Wound healing and Transwell invasion assays were used to analyze the migration and invasion of the A549 cells, respectively. In addition, overexpression plasmids and small interfering RNAs were used to overexpress or knockdown the expression levels of CD73 in the A549 cell line, respectively. Finally, the interaction between CD73 and EGFR in the A549 cell line was analyzed using immunoprecipitation. Results. Our research emphasized the importance of CD73 in the prognosis of LUAD and highlighted it as a potential therapeutic target. We also found that the mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 are increased in LUAD specimens and cell lines and were associated with a poor prognosis in patients with LUAD. Furthermore, it was revealed that CD73 may promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of the A549 cell line. Finally, we demonstrated that CD73 could bind epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to further regulate the activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Conclusions. CD73 promotes LUAD proliferation and metastasis through EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the most common malignant cancer and the main cause of cancer-related deaths globally. In 2018, there were~18 million newly diagnosed tumors worldwide, in which lung cancer accounted for 11.6% of all cases [1]. Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accounts for >40% of lung cancer cases, and numerous LUAD cases show early dissemination and metastasis [2]. There have been improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of LUAD; however, the 5-year survival rate is still <20% [3]. Therefore, there is an urgent requirement to investigate novel molecular markers and therapeutic targets for LUAD.In recent years, an increasing number of researchers have investigated the role of the purine metabolic signaling pathway in tumorigenesis, tumor development, and immune escape [4, 5]. CD73 is one of the key rate limiting enzymes in the extracellular purine metabolic pathway [6]. It also exists in most animal and plant tissues and plays different functions in various physiological and pathological processes. As a hydrolase, CD73 can catalyze the hydrolysis of extracellular AMP into adenosine and phosphate to control the concentration of adenosine in the tumor microenvironment, which may further affect tumor cell proliferation [7], tumor neovascularization [8], tumor immune escape [9], and the immune response [10]. In addition, CD73 could also regulate the adhesion signal pathway and interaction between cells and the extracellular matrix to promote the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells [11]. Previous studies revealed that CD73 may play a potential role in the pathogenesis of cancer; however, the exact function and mechanism of CD73 in the pathogenesis of LUAD have not been fully investigated.In the present study, we hypothesized that CD73 may participate in the progression of LUAD. The expression level of CD73 was analyzed in clinical samples, and the effect and underlying mechanism of CD73 on the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD were investigatedin vitro. The results showed that CD73 may promote LUAD progression by activating the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/AKT/mTOR axis, which could be a promising prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in LUAD.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Patients and Specimen Collection

Between May 2009 and May2021, 114 patients were diagnosed with LUAD according to the World Health Organization LUAD cancer diagnostic criteria at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, then recruited into the present study. For specimen collection, the samples were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature and then processed for further analysis. Subsequently, the adjacent normal lung tissue was obtained as the control, which was at least 5 cm from the tumor tissue. Clinical characteristics, including sex, age, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size were obtained from the medical records. The TNM stage was determined according to the International Union against Cancer guidelines [12]. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (approval number: no. 2019-1425). The patients and their families were informed regarding the study prior to the start of the study and provided written informed consent. The clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Clinicopathological parameters of patients in low-CD73 expression and high-CD73 expression groups.
TermsCasesCD73 expression (low/high=55/59)LowHighP valueSexMale (n)5324290.687Female (n)6131300.087Age (years)< medium (58)5426280.611≥ medium (58)6029310.956N classificationN05434200.037N1−36021390.015Clinical stageStage I4328150.387Stage II-IV7127440.034Primary tumor sizeTumorsize<3cm4931180.028Tumorsize≥3cm6524410.018


### 2.2. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) Database

The GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) database is an online bioinformatics website to analyze RNA sequencing data, including the data of 9,736 tumors and 8,587 normal samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the GTEx projects. The database was used to analyze the expression level of CD73 in LUAD cases. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) database was used to determine the survival rate based on the expression level of CD73 in LUAD samples using the log-rank test.


### 2.3. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

After the samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature, the LUAD tissue was embedded in paraffin and cut into 4μm thick sections. Then, the sections were subjected to antigen retrieval and blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 60 min at room temperature. Nonspecific binding was blocked using QuickBlock™ blocking reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4°C followed by rabbit/mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) at room temperature for 2 h. The proteins were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 10 min at room temperature. The primary antibody used is listed in Table S1. All the images were captured using an Axio Scope A1 optical microscope (Zeiss GmbH). The positive areas were quantified and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).


### 2.4. Cell Culture

A normal human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and five human lung cancer cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. In brief, the cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone; Cytiva) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. The medium was changed every two days. The cells used for experiments were between passages 2 and 5.In certain experiments, the A549 cell line was treated with CD73 specific inhibitor a, b-methylene ADP (a, b-methylene adenosine-5¢-disphosphate, APCP) (10 nM; Millipore Sigma), gefitinib (2μM; Millipore Sigma), MK-2206 (20 nM; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), or rapamycin (20 ng/ml; Millipore Sigma) for 24 h in vitro. In the CD73−pcDNA+vehicle group, cells were treated with the same volume of saline.


### 2.5. Construction and Transfection of CD73-Overexpressing Plasmid

First, the CD73 coding gene was cloned into the pcDNA3.0+ expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA); then, the pcDNA-CD73 and control plasmids (control-CD73-pcDNA) were transfected into the A549 cell line using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the A549 cells (3×105/well) were seeded in a six-well plate and cultured until 70-80% confluent. Then, premixed lipofection and plasmid DNA (10 μl: 4 μg) were added to the wells and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. 24 h later, cells were used for subsequent experimentation.


### 2.6. Construction and Transfection of CD73 siRNA

The siRNA of CD73 was performed with the method of Zhi et al. [13]. Briefly, CD73 DNA sequences (GCCACTAGCATCTCAAATA) were selected for designing the siRNA target, and CD73 siRNA plasmid was constructed based on the U6 siRNA expression vector, pRNAT-U6.1/Neo vector (GenScript Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). The control RNA interference (RNAi) sequence was a randomly scrambled sequence not found in mouse, human, or rat genome databases. All constructs (control plasmid, CD73 siRNA) were confirmed by sequencing. The CD73 siRNA and control plasmids were transfected into A549 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA).


### 2.7. Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was assessed using a Cell Counting Kit- (CCK-) 8 Assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, each group of A549 cell suspensions (8×104/ml) was seeded in 96-well plates with growth medium. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with 90 μl fresh medium and 10 μl CCK-8 solution, and the cells were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.).


### 2.8. Colony Formation Assay

The A549 cell line was digested using trypsin-EDTA (MilliporeSigma) and concentrated to 150 cells/ml. Then, 2 ml cell suspension (300 cells/well) was added to the six-well plates and treated with oxaliplatin or vehicle for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and stained with H&E for 30 min. The number of colonies, containing >50, was counted under a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


### 2.9. Transwell Invasion Assay

The A549 cell line (2×104 cells/well) was added to the upper chamber of a Transwell insert (Corning, Inc.). The Transwell membrane was precoated with Matrigel for 30 min at 37°C (BD Biosciences). Then, 500 μl RPMI-1640 medium, containing 5% FBS, was added to the bottom chamber. After 48 h, the invaded cells on the bottom were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. The invaded cells were visualized using a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


### 2.10. Apoptosis Assay

After incubation, the A549 cell line was trypsinized and collected. Then, the cells were washed with cold PBS, adjusted to1×106 cells/ml, labeled with Annexin V-FITC and PI, and analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (both from BD Biosciences). The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the percentage of labeled cells undergoing apoptosis in each group was determined and calculated. Analytical flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and the data were processed using the Cellquest software (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).


### 2.11. Wound Healing Assay

The A549 cell line in logarithmic growth phase was obtained and seeded into 96-well plates (5×104 cells/well). After 24 h, a wound was created in the center using a pipette tip. Then, the cells were washed with PBS, and the medium was replaced with serum-free medium. After 24 h, images of the cells were captured under a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


### 2.12. Western Blot Analysis

Total protein was extracted from the tissues or cells using RIPA buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology); then, the protein concentration was calculated by the BCA method. It was separated using SDS-PAGE (40μg/lane) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder for 60 min at 25°C. Then, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C, and the blots were washed three times with TBST and subsequently incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. The blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Band intensities were quantified using Image-Pro Plus v6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.). GAPDH was used for the normalization of different proteins. The primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Table S1.


### 2.13. Immunoprecipitation (IP)

The A549 cell line was lysed in EBC lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50μg/ml of phenylmethylsulfonylfluo-ride (PMSF), and 100 mM NaF). The soluble supernatant was mixed with the antibody and incubated overnight at 4°C. Protein A/G beads were then added to the reaction mixture. After washing, the protein was resuspended in SDS sample buffer and separated and analyzed using SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis (details were as mentioned above). The antibodies used are listed in Table S1.


### 2.14. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells using a RNA isolation kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc.). cDNA was reverse-transcribed using HiScript III RT SuperMix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.) on a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). qPCR was performed using ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (VazymeBiotech Co., Ltd.) and the ViiA7 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCqmethod [14]. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control. The sequences of the primers used are included in Table S2.


### 2.15. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21.0 (IBM Corp.). The data were analyzed using a Student’st-test or a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


## 2.1. Patients and Specimen Collection

Between May 2009 and May2021, 114 patients were diagnosed with LUAD according to the World Health Organization LUAD cancer diagnostic criteria at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, then recruited into the present study. For specimen collection, the samples were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature and then processed for further analysis. Subsequently, the adjacent normal lung tissue was obtained as the control, which was at least 5 cm from the tumor tissue. Clinical characteristics, including sex, age, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size were obtained from the medical records. The TNM stage was determined according to the International Union against Cancer guidelines [12]. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (approval number: no. 2019-1425). The patients and their families were informed regarding the study prior to the start of the study and provided written informed consent. The clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Clinicopathological parameters of patients in low-CD73 expression and high-CD73 expression groups.
TermsCasesCD73 expression (low/high=55/59)LowHighP valueSexMale (n)5324290.687Female (n)6131300.087Age (years)< medium (58)5426280.611≥ medium (58)6029310.956N classificationN05434200.037N1−36021390.015Clinical stageStage I4328150.387Stage II-IV7127440.034Primary tumor sizeTumorsize<3cm4931180.028Tumorsize≥3cm6524410.018


## 2.2. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) Database

The GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/index.html) database is an online bioinformatics website to analyze RNA sequencing data, including the data of 9,736 tumors and 8,587 normal samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the GTEx projects. The database was used to analyze the expression level of CD73 in LUAD cases. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier Plotter (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) database was used to determine the survival rate based on the expression level of CD73 in LUAD samples using the log-rank test.


## 2.3. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

After the samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at room temperature, the LUAD tissue was embedded in paraffin and cut into 4μm thick sections. Then, the sections were subjected to antigen retrieval and blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 60 min at room temperature. Nonspecific binding was blocked using QuickBlock™ blocking reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4°C followed by rabbit/mouse HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) at room temperature for 2 h. The proteins were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 10 min at room temperature. The primary antibody used is listed in Table S1. All the images were captured using an Axio Scope A1 optical microscope (Zeiss GmbH). The positive areas were quantified and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.).


## 2.4. Cell Culture

A normal human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and five human lung cancer cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. In brief, the cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) or RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone; Cytiva) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. The medium was changed every two days. The cells used for experiments were between passages 2 and 5.In certain experiments, the A549 cell line was treated with CD73 specific inhibitor a, b-methylene ADP (a, b-methylene adenosine-5¢-disphosphate, APCP) (10 nM; Millipore Sigma), gefitinib (2μM; Millipore Sigma), MK-2206 (20 nM; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), or rapamycin (20 ng/ml; Millipore Sigma) for 24 h in vitro. In the CD73−pcDNA+vehicle group, cells were treated with the same volume of saline.


## 2.5. Construction and Transfection of CD73-Overexpressing Plasmid

First, the CD73 coding gene was cloned into the pcDNA3.0+ expression vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA); then, the pcDNA-CD73 and control plasmids (control-CD73-pcDNA) were transfected into the A549 cell line using Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the A549 cells (3×105/well) were seeded in a six-well plate and cultured until 70-80% confluent. Then, premixed lipofection and plasmid DNA (10 μl: 4 μg) were added to the wells and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. 24 h later, cells were used for subsequent experimentation.


## 2.6. Construction and Transfection of CD73 siRNA

The siRNA of CD73 was performed with the method of Zhi et al. [13]. Briefly, CD73 DNA sequences (GCCACTAGCATCTCAAATA) were selected for designing the siRNA target, and CD73 siRNA plasmid was constructed based on the U6 siRNA expression vector, pRNAT-U6.1/Neo vector (GenScript Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). The control RNA interference (RNAi) sequence was a randomly scrambled sequence not found in mouse, human, or rat genome databases. All constructs (control plasmid, CD73 siRNA) were confirmed by sequencing. The CD73 siRNA and control plasmids were transfected into A549 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad CA, USA).


## 2.7. Proliferation Assay

Cell proliferation was assessed using a Cell Counting Kit- (CCK-) 8 Assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, each group of A549 cell suspensions (8×104/ml) was seeded in 96-well plates with growth medium. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with 90 μl fresh medium and 10 μl CCK-8 solution, and the cells were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc.).


## 2.8. Colony Formation Assay

The A549 cell line was digested using trypsin-EDTA (MilliporeSigma) and concentrated to 150 cells/ml. Then, 2 ml cell suspension (300 cells/well) was added to the six-well plates and treated with oxaliplatin or vehicle for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and stained with H&E for 30 min. The number of colonies, containing >50, was counted under a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


## 2.9. Transwell Invasion Assay

The A549 cell line (2×104 cells/well) was added to the upper chamber of a Transwell insert (Corning, Inc.). The Transwell membrane was precoated with Matrigel for 30 min at 37°C (BD Biosciences). Then, 500 μl RPMI-1640 medium, containing 5% FBS, was added to the bottom chamber. After 48 h, the invaded cells on the bottom were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. The invaded cells were visualized using a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


## 2.10. Apoptosis Assay

After incubation, the A549 cell line was trypsinized and collected. Then, the cells were washed with cold PBS, adjusted to1×106 cells/ml, labeled with Annexin V-FITC and PI, and analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (both from BD Biosciences). The experiment was performed in triplicate, and the percentage of labeled cells undergoing apoptosis in each group was determined and calculated. Analytical flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA), and the data were processed using the Cellquest software (Becton-Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).


## 2.11. Wound Healing Assay

The A549 cell line in logarithmic growth phase was obtained and seeded into 96-well plates (5×104 cells/well). After 24 h, a wound was created in the center using a pipette tip. Then, the cells were washed with PBS, and the medium was replaced with serum-free medium. After 24 h, images of the cells were captured under a light microscope (Zeiss GmbH).


## 2.12. Western Blot Analysis

Total protein was extracted from the tissues or cells using RIPA buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology); then, the protein concentration was calculated by the BCA method. It was separated using SDS-PAGE (40μg/lane) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (GE Healthcare). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder for 60 min at 25°C. Then, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C, and the blots were washed three times with TBST and subsequently incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. The blots were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). Band intensities were quantified using Image-Pro Plus v6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Inc.). GAPDH was used for the normalization of different proteins. The primary and secondary antibodies used are listed in Table S1.


## 2.13. Immunoprecipitation (IP)

The A549 cell line was lysed in EBC lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50μg/ml of phenylmethylsulfonylfluo-ride (PMSF), and 100 mM NaF). The soluble supernatant was mixed with the antibody and incubated overnight at 4°C. Protein A/G beads were then added to the reaction mixture. After washing, the protein was resuspended in SDS sample buffer and separated and analyzed using SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis (details were as mentioned above). The antibodies used are listed in Table S1.


## 2.14. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the cultured cells using a RNA isolation kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc.). cDNA was reverse-transcribed using HiScript III RT SuperMix (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd.) on a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). qPCR was performed using ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (VazymeBiotech Co., Ltd.) and the ViiA7 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The relative expression levels of target genes were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCqmethod [14]. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control. The sequences of the primers used are included in Table S2.


## 2.15. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21.0 (IBM Corp.). The data were analyzed using a Student’st-test or a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Increased CD73 Expression Levels Are Associated with a Poorer Prognosis in Patients with LUAD

To elucidate the functional roles of CD73 in LUAD, we first used the GEPIA database to identify the expression levels of CD73 in LUAD tissues (n=483) and paired normal lung tissues (n=347). The results indicated that CD73 mRNA expression levels were significantly increased in LUAD samples (Figure 1(a)). Based on the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database, patients with LUAD and low mRNA expression levels of CD73 had improved overall survival times (Figure 1(b)). In addition, we also used IHC in patients with LUAD (n=114) to confirm the aforementioned results. There was an increased protein expression level of CD73 in LUAD tissues compared with that in the adjacent normal lung tissues (P<0.05; Figure 1(c)). These results provide strong evidence of an increase in the CD73 expression level in LUAD.Figure 1
Increased CD73 expression levels are associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with LUAD. (a) The CD73 mRNA expression levels were analyzed in LUAD tissues (n=483) and normal lung tissues (n=347) using the GEPIA database. (b) Overall survival time based on LUAD expression levels using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database. (c) CD73 protein expression levels in tissue sections from patients with LUAD (n=114) using immunohistochemistry. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; GEPIA: gene expression profiling interactive analysis.
(a)(b)(c)Subsequently, we analyzed the association between the expression levels of CD73 and the clinical pathological characteristics in patients with LUAD, including sex, age, lymph-node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size was investigated. As shown in Table1, there was no statistically significant difference between the expression levels of CD73 and sex or age. However, the expression levels of CD73 were significantly associated with cancer differentiation, lymph-node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size (P<0.05). Taken together, the aforementioned results revealed that CD73 might be an independent prognostic factor for patients with LUAD.


### 3.2. CD73 Expression Levels Are Increased in the NSCLC Cell Lines

Next, we measured the mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 in several cell lines, including the human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and the human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549). Our research demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 in the NSCLC cell lines were significantly higher compared with that in the BEAS-2B cell line (P<0.05; Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). As the A549 cell line showed the highest CD73 expression level, we chose this cell line for the following experiments.Figure 2
Increased CD73 expression promotes LUAD cell proliferationin vitro. The (a) mRNA and (b) protein expression levels of CD73 in a human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and human NSCLC cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549). (c) The protein and (d) mRNA expression levels of CD73 in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. (e) Cell viability and (f) colony formation assays in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmids, or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. ∗P<0.05 compared to control; &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


### 3.3. CD73 Promotes LUAD Cell Proliferation and MetastasisIn Vitro

To examine the function of CD73 in the pathogenesis of LUAD, we established CD73 overexpression and CD73 knockdown A549 cell lines using an overexpression plasmid and small interfering (si) RNA (Figures2(c) and 2(d)). Furthermore, some of the A549 cells were treated with APCP (a CD73 antagonist) to inhibit the function, but not the expression level of CD73 in the A549 cell line (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)).Then, we further analyzed the role of CD73 in the proliferation of LUAD. The cell viability assay demonstrated that the proliferative ability of the A549 cell line with knockdown of CD73 expression or treated with APCP was decreased in a time-dependent manner (Figure2(e)). By contrast, CD73 overexpression could promote the proliferative ability of the A549 cells in vitro. Furthermore, the colony formation assay also supported the aforementioned results (Figure 2(f)). An apoptosis assay was used to analyze the proliferation and apoptotic ability of the A549 cells. Our research found that the apoptotic ratio was decreased in the A549 cells following knockdown of CD73 expression or in cells treated with APCP, whereas it was increased in the CD73 overexpression A549 cell lines (Figure 3). Collectively, these data revealed that CD73 was associated with proliferation of the A549 cell line in vitro.Figure 3
Increased CD73 expression suppresses LUAD cell apoptosisin vitro. The apoptotic rate of the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. (a) The apoptosis rate of the A549 cells and (b) the representative flow cytometry plots. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)Considering that CD73 positively regulated the proliferative ability of A549 cells, we further investigated whether CD73 also affected the metastatic ability of LUADin vitro. We performed wound healing and Transwell invasion assays using the A549 cells, and the results showed that the migratory and invasive abilities of cells were increased in the CD73 overexpression A549 cells and reduced in the cells with CD73 expression knocked down or in cells treated with APCP (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). This indicated that CD73 may promote LUAD aggressiveness in vitro. In summary, these results suggested that CD73 may promote the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD in vitro.Figure 4
Increased CD73 expression promotes LUAD cell migration and invasionin vitro. The (a) invasion and (b) migration abilities of the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA or overexpression plasmid or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. CD73 Binds EGFR to Activate the AKT/mTOR Signaling PathwayIn Vitro

EGFR is considered to be a sensitive biomarker of LUAD [15]. Therefore, we investigated whether the function of CD73 in LUAD was associated with EGFR. Using immunoprecipitation assays, we found that CD73 could bind to EGFR in the A549 cell line. This indicated that CD73 may exert its function via EGFR in LUAD. The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is one of the most common signaling pathways that participate in the pathogenesis of LUAD and a downstream pathway of EGFR [16]. We next tested the activation of the members of the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in the A549 cell line. We found that the ratios of phosphorylated (p)-EGFR/EGFR, p-AKT/AKT, and p-mTOR/mTOR were decreased in the cells with CD73 expression knocked down or in cells treated with APCP, while it was increased in CD73 overexpressing A549 cells (Figures 5(b)–5(e)). Thus, our data indicated that CD73 could markedly activate the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in the A549 cells.Figure 5
CD73 binds to EGFR to activate the AKT/mTOR signaling pathwayin vitro. (a) Immunoprecipitation was used to determine the interaction between CD73 and EGFR in the A549 cell line. (b) Representative western blots of p-EGFR, EGFR, p-AKT, AKT, p-mTOR, and mTOR in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA or overexpression plasmid or treated with APCP. The ratio of (c) p-EGFR/EGFR, (d) p-AKT/AKT, and (e) p-mTOR/mTOR in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering; p: phosphorylated.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.5. CD73 Promotes LUAD Proliferation and Metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR Axis

Next, we verified whether CD73 regulates the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD by regulating the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. In these experiments, A549 cells overexpressing CD73 were treated with gefitinib (an EGFR inhibitor), MK-2206 (an AKT inhibitor), or rapamycin (an mTOR inhibitor). Then, cell viability and colony formation assays were performed. The results showed that the increase in proliferation following CD73 overexpression could be prevented by these inhibitors (Figures6(a) and 6(b)). An apoptosis assay also supported the aforementioned results (Figure 6(c)). These results suggest that CD73 may promote the proliferation of the A549 cell line via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. In assessing the metastatic ability, we found that CD73-induced migration and invasion could also be neutralized by gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin in the A549 cell line (Figures 6(d) and 6(e)). Taken together, our research demonstrated that CD73 may promote LUAD proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in vitro.Figure 6
CD73 promotes LUAD proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. The (a) cell viability and (b) colony formation assays in the A549 cells following treatment with gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin. (c) Apoptosis, (d) migration, and (e) invasion abilities of the A549 cells following treatment with gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as themean±SD. #P<0.05 compared to CD73−pcDNA+vehicle. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.1. Increased CD73 Expression Levels Are Associated with a Poorer Prognosis in Patients with LUAD

To elucidate the functional roles of CD73 in LUAD, we first used the GEPIA database to identify the expression levels of CD73 in LUAD tissues (n=483) and paired normal lung tissues (n=347). The results indicated that CD73 mRNA expression levels were significantly increased in LUAD samples (Figure 1(a)). Based on the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database, patients with LUAD and low mRNA expression levels of CD73 had improved overall survival times (Figure 1(b)). In addition, we also used IHC in patients with LUAD (n=114) to confirm the aforementioned results. There was an increased protein expression level of CD73 in LUAD tissues compared with that in the adjacent normal lung tissues (P<0.05; Figure 1(c)). These results provide strong evidence of an increase in the CD73 expression level in LUAD.Figure 1
Increased CD73 expression levels are associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with LUAD. (a) The CD73 mRNA expression levels were analyzed in LUAD tissues (n=483) and normal lung tissues (n=347) using the GEPIA database. (b) Overall survival time based on LUAD expression levels using the Kaplan-Meier Plotter database. (c) CD73 protein expression levels in tissue sections from patients with LUAD (n=114) using immunohistochemistry. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; GEPIA: gene expression profiling interactive analysis.
(a)(b)(c)Subsequently, we analyzed the association between the expression levels of CD73 and the clinical pathological characteristics in patients with LUAD, including sex, age, lymph-node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size was investigated. As shown in Table1, there was no statistically significant difference between the expression levels of CD73 and sex or age. However, the expression levels of CD73 were significantly associated with cancer differentiation, lymph-node metastasis, TNM stage, and tumor size (P<0.05). Taken together, the aforementioned results revealed that CD73 might be an independent prognostic factor for patients with LUAD.


## 3.2. CD73 Expression Levels Are Increased in the NSCLC Cell Lines

Next, we measured the mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 in several cell lines, including the human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and the human nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549). Our research demonstrated that the mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 in the NSCLC cell lines were significantly higher compared with that in the BEAS-2B cell line (P<0.05; Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). As the A549 cell line showed the highest CD73 expression level, we chose this cell line for the following experiments.Figure 2
Increased CD73 expression promotes LUAD cell proliferationin vitro. The (a) mRNA and (b) protein expression levels of CD73 in a human lung epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B) and human NSCLC cell lines (PC-9, H460, PGCL3, H1650, and A549). (c) The protein and (d) mRNA expression levels of CD73 in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. (e) Cell viability and (f) colony formation assays in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmids, or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. ∗P<0.05 compared to control; &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering; NSCLC: nonsmall cell lung cancer.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)


## 3.3. CD73 Promotes LUAD Cell Proliferation and MetastasisIn Vitro

To examine the function of CD73 in the pathogenesis of LUAD, we established CD73 overexpression and CD73 knockdown A549 cell lines using an overexpression plasmid and small interfering (si) RNA (Figures2(c) and 2(d)). Furthermore, some of the A549 cells were treated with APCP (a CD73 antagonist) to inhibit the function, but not the expression level of CD73 in the A549 cell line (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)).Then, we further analyzed the role of CD73 in the proliferation of LUAD. The cell viability assay demonstrated that the proliferative ability of the A549 cell line with knockdown of CD73 expression or treated with APCP was decreased in a time-dependent manner (Figure2(e)). By contrast, CD73 overexpression could promote the proliferative ability of the A549 cells in vitro. Furthermore, the colony formation assay also supported the aforementioned results (Figure 2(f)). An apoptosis assay was used to analyze the proliferation and apoptotic ability of the A549 cells. Our research found that the apoptotic ratio was decreased in the A549 cells following knockdown of CD73 expression or in cells treated with APCP, whereas it was increased in the CD73 overexpression A549 cell lines (Figure 3). Collectively, these data revealed that CD73 was associated with proliferation of the A549 cell line in vitro.Figure 3
Increased CD73 expression suppresses LUAD cell apoptosisin vitro. The apoptotic rate of the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. (a) The apoptosis rate of the A549 cells and (b) the representative flow cytometry plots. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)Considering that CD73 positively regulated the proliferative ability of A549 cells, we further investigated whether CD73 also affected the metastatic ability of LUADin vitro. We performed wound healing and Transwell invasion assays using the A549 cells, and the results showed that the migratory and invasive abilities of cells were increased in the CD73 overexpression A549 cells and reduced in the cells with CD73 expression knocked down or in cells treated with APCP (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). This indicated that CD73 may promote LUAD aggressiveness in vitro. In summary, these results suggested that CD73 may promote the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD in vitro.Figure 4
Increased CD73 expression promotes LUAD cell migration and invasionin vitro. The (a) invasion and (b) migration abilities of the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA or overexpression plasmid or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. CD73 Binds EGFR to Activate the AKT/mTOR Signaling PathwayIn Vitro

EGFR is considered to be a sensitive biomarker of LUAD [15]. Therefore, we investigated whether the function of CD73 in LUAD was associated with EGFR. Using immunoprecipitation assays, we found that CD73 could bind to EGFR in the A549 cell line. This indicated that CD73 may exert its function via EGFR in LUAD. The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is one of the most common signaling pathways that participate in the pathogenesis of LUAD and a downstream pathway of EGFR [16]. We next tested the activation of the members of the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in the A549 cell line. We found that the ratios of phosphorylated (p)-EGFR/EGFR, p-AKT/AKT, and p-mTOR/mTOR were decreased in the cells with CD73 expression knocked down or in cells treated with APCP, while it was increased in CD73 overexpressing A549 cells (Figures 5(b)–5(e)). Thus, our data indicated that CD73 could markedly activate the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in the A549 cells.Figure 5
CD73 binds to EGFR to activate the AKT/mTOR signaling pathwayin vitro. (a) Immunoprecipitation was used to determine the interaction between CD73 and EGFR in the A549 cell line. (b) Representative western blots of p-EGFR, EGFR, p-AKT, AKT, p-mTOR, and mTOR in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA or overexpression plasmid or treated with APCP. The ratio of (c) p-EGFR/EGFR, (d) p-AKT/AKT, and (e) p-mTOR/mTOR in the A549 cells following transfection with siRNA, overexpression plasmid, or treatment with APCP. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as the mean±SD. &P<0.05 between two groups. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma; si: small interfering; p: phosphorylated.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.5. CD73 Promotes LUAD Proliferation and Metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR Axis

Next, we verified whether CD73 regulates the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD by regulating the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. In these experiments, A549 cells overexpressing CD73 were treated with gefitinib (an EGFR inhibitor), MK-2206 (an AKT inhibitor), or rapamycin (an mTOR inhibitor). Then, cell viability and colony formation assays were performed. The results showed that the increase in proliferation following CD73 overexpression could be prevented by these inhibitors (Figures6(a) and 6(b)). An apoptosis assay also supported the aforementioned results (Figure 6(c)). These results suggest that CD73 may promote the proliferation of the A549 cell line via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. In assessing the metastatic ability, we found that CD73-induced migration and invasion could also be neutralized by gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin in the A549 cell line (Figures 6(d) and 6(e)). Taken together, our research demonstrated that CD73 may promote LUAD proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis in vitro.Figure 6
CD73 promotes LUAD proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. The (a) cell viability and (b) colony formation assays in the A549 cells following treatment with gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin. (c) Apoptosis, (d) migration, and (e) invasion abilities of the A549 cells following treatment with gefitinib, MK-2206, or rapamycin. Each experiment was performed three times. The data are presented as themean±SD. #P<0.05 compared to CD73−pcDNA+vehicle. LUAD: lung adenocarcinoma.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 4. Discussion

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of all cancers worldwide [17]. NSCLC accounts for ~80% lung cancer cases, and ~50% are LUAD. The technology and developed therapies have improved the diagnosis of LUAD; however, the 5-year overall survival is still low, and the recurrence rate is also unsatisfactory due to the early metastasis [18]. Therefore, it is important for us to investigate the molecular mechanisms of LUAD development and identify sensitive prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.This study investigated the function of CD73 and the mechanisms involved in the progression of LUAD. CD73, also known as extracellular 5′-nucleotidase, with a molecular weight of 70 kDa, is a multifunctional transmembrane glycoprotein anchored to the surface of the cell membrane by glycosylphosphatidylinositol [19]. In the tumor microenvironment, CD73 can hydrolyze and produce a large amount of adenosine, which is considered an important purinergic signal transducer involved in cancer progression. In addition, adenosine can also promote neovascularization, tumor cell proliferation, and tumor immune escape by binding with different receptors [20]. CD73 is also a regulatory molecule that participates in the invasion and metastasis of cancers. Oh et al. [21] reported that overexpression of CD73 may promote the proliferation of epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells in vitro. Xing et al. [22] found that the CD73-TGFβ dual-blockade may promote a multifaceted inflammatory tumor microenvironment, as shown by the diminished levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and M2-macrophages, and substantially increased levels of activated dendritic cells, cytotoxic T cells, and B cells. Furthermore, CD73 also promoted the proliferation and migration of human cervical cancer cells, independent of its enzyme activity [23]. To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, we identified that CD73 mRNA and protein expression levels were increased in human LUAD, and high CD73 expression level was associated with poor prognosis in patients with LUAD. This suggested that CD73 could be a strong predictor for LUAD diagnosis and prognosis. In addition, we also found that CD73 promoted the proliferation, invasion, and migration of the A549 cell line in vitro. Taken together, for future research, CD73 may be a promising potential biomarker for the prognosis and therapeutic management of LUAD, which is valuable to develop for targeted diagnosis and treatment.EGFR is a member of the HER/ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases [24, 25]. The EGFR gene is mutated in ~10 and 50% of patients with NSCLC of Caucasian or Asian ethnicity, respectively [26]. Numerous studies have reported that EGFR may be an effective therapeutic target for LUAD. For example, compared with chemotherapy, some published clinical trials showed that administration of gefitinib, erlotinib, or apatinib to treat advanced NSCLC, expressing EGFR activating mutations, could increase the progression-free survival time and improve the quality of life [27, 28]. Our research also demonstrated that AKT/mTOR activation was strongly associated with CD73 expression in vitro and that the function of CD73 could be inhibited by EGFR, AKT, or mTOR inhibitors. These results suggested that CD73 may participate in the pathogenesis of LUAD via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, we reported for the first time that CD73 interacted with EGFR to enhance AKT/mTOR activity to promote the proliferation and metastasis of LUAD. The mechanisms involved in the EGFR interaction, however, require further investigation.One of the limitations of this article is that we still lack specific animal experiments to confirm our results in vivo. Fortunately, many previous articles had reported the role and function of CD73 in lung cancer. For example, Baghbani et al. [29] found that silencing tumor-intrinsic CD73 could enhance the chemosensitivity of NSCLC and potentiate the antitumoral effects of cisplatin in vitro. Petruk et al. [30] also demonstrated that CD73 may facilitate EMT progression and promote lung metastases in triple-negative breast cancer. However, we did not find the research about the relation between CD73 and the EGFR/AKT/mTOR pathway in vivo. In the future, we would develop suitable animal model to prove our results in vivo, which might provide more believable evidences for CD73 and EGFR/AKT/mTOR pathway targeted treatment in LUAD.In summary, this study revealed the importance of CD73 in the prognosis and therapeutic targeting of LUAD. The mRNA and protein expression levels of CD73 were increased in LUAD specimens and cell lines and were associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, our results also suggested that CD73 may promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of the A549 cells. Lastly, CD73 could bind to EGFR to further regulate the activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Thus, the present study demonstrated that CD73 promotes LUAD proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/AKT/mTOR axis. However, there are several limitations to the present study. The specific mechanism in which CD73 binds to EGFR requires further research. The role of EGFR in the pathogenesis of LUAD has been investigated; however, it is still important to investigate the precise target site and the specific mechanism of how CD73 binds to EGFR to exert its function.



---

*Source: 9944847-2022-06-29.xml*