# Preparation and Characterization of Chabazite from Construction Waste and Application as an Adsorbent for Methylene Blue

Authors: Xue Song; Yingming Zhang; Xiangke Cui; Fangfang Liu; Hailiang Zhao
Journal: Adsorption Science & Technology
 (2021)

---

## Abstract

Construction waste, produced from building projects, was utilized to prepare chabazite by alkali fusion hydrothermal synthesis method. The synthesized chabazite was used as an adsorbent for the removal of methylene blue (MB). XRD, FTIR, and N2 adsorption/desorption curves were adopted to describe the physical and chemical properties of the samples. The results show that the synthesized chabazite possesses crystalline structure, typical functional groups, and large specific surface area of 421.34 m2 g-1. Adsorption isotherms and kinetic curves show that the adsorption process follows the Langmuir model and pseudo-second-order kinetics model. The maximum adsorption capacity of MB on the synthesized chabazite reaches up to 129.18 mg g-1 at 298 K, which is about 16 times that of construction waste. The removal rate of MB reaches more than 90%, and the adsorbed amount is about 35 mg g-1 after 1 h at 298 K. Thermodynamic parameters, namely ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG of -12.83 kJ mol-1, -27.37 J mol-1 K-1, and -4.68 kJ mol-1 at 298 K, respectively, indicate that the adsorption of MB on the chabazite is physical, orderliness-tended, and spontaneous process. Moreover, the synthesized chabazite has a good property of regeneration and reuse. The results indicate that using construction waste to prepare chabazite in application as an adsorbent is feasible, which provides a novel and environment-friendly way for recycling construction waste.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In the process of urbanization, building projects have resulted in a large number of construction and demolition waste over the last few decades, and this situation will also exist in the future in order to meet the growing urban population and higher standards of living [1]. Construction waste is generated during the construction, renovation, repair, and demolition of buildings, including concrete, brick, soil, wood, metals, and other residues [2]. Construction waste has already become a serious problem in many countries. The overall utilization of construction waste in developing countries is relatively low. Simple landfill, open-air stacking, and mixing with municipal solid waste are still the main disposal methods of construction waste at this stage, which can cause environment pollution and occupation of land [2–4]. Recycling and reuse of construction waste are mainly used for backfilling of pits and for pavement base and subbase in road engineering. In addition, construction waste can prepare recycled aggregate products, such as recycled aggregate floor tiles and permeable tiles, and prepare recycled concrete and mortar [5, 6]. Few other technologies of recycling and reuse of construction waste have been studied.Zeolites are microporous crystalline hydrated aluminosilicates. The basic structural unit is the skeleton of SiO4 and AlO4- tetrahedron formed by elements Si, Al, and O [7, 8]. Because of the good surface chemical properties and pore structure, zeolites have excellent applications in adsorption, separation, catalysis, ion exchange, and filtration [7]. There are many types of zeolites, such as analcime, Na-X, chabazite, and ZSM-5. Zeolites are conventionally synthesized by commercial reagents, but they can also be prepared from industrial by-products or wastes rich in Si and/or Al [9]. At present, the main industrial wastes used to prepare zeolites are coal fly ash, slag, and biomass ash [10]. Coal fly ash was first used as Si and Al sources for zeolite preparation by Höller and Wirsching in 1985 [11]. They prepared zeolite by alkaline activation and studied the effects of activation time, temperature, solution composition, and concentration on the synthesized zeolite. Jin et al. prepared chabazite using coal fly ash as low-cost raw materials and obtained the optimal synthesis parameters [12]. Zhang et al. synthesized zeolite 13X from coal fly ash by the hydrothermal method without adding any extra Si or Al sources and measured the CO2 adsorption capacity of the synthesized zeolite 13X [13]. By contrast, researches on preparing zeolites from biomass ash are relatively less. Kongnoo et al. studied the optimal condition for preparing zeolite 13X from palm oil mill fly ash, which can be utilized as a Si source, through alkaline fusion and hydrothermal method, and found that the synthesized zeolite 13X had a better performance in CO2 adsorption than the commercial zeolite 13X [14]. Purnomo et al. used bagasse fly ash as Si and Al sources to synthesize highly pure zeolite Na-X and Na-A, which possessed higher porosity and ion exchange capacity than the commercial ones [15].The premise of using waste to synthesize zeolite is to study the characteristics and synthesis parameters of waste in order to produce pure and stable zeolite, which is suitable for industrial application. After primary analysis, the construction waste used in this study mainly consists of cement blocks, bricks, and a small amount of sand. Based on its composition, it can be utilized as raw material for synthesizing chabazite (a kind of intermediate silica zeolites with Si/Al ratio in the range of 2-5) without adding any Si and Al sources. Characteristics of the synthesized chabazite were studied and adsorption of methylene blue (MB) was operated to evaluate its adsorption properties as an adsorbent which may be applied in water treatment. This study is aimed at providing a novel and environment-friendly way for recycling and reuse of construction waste and to realize waste control by waste.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Materials

Construction waste used as raw material was collected from the remnants of rural demolition and relocation around Zhengzhou, China. The main components of construction waste are listed in Table1. It can be seen that the main components of construction waste are CaO, SiO2, and Al2O3. The content of CaO is the highest, mainly because the construction waste contains a lot of cement. Moreover, CaO can provide alkaline environment, which is conducive to the activation of construction waste in the preparation process. SiO2 and Al2O3 can be silicon and aluminium sources for the preparation of chabazite. The Si/Al ratio of the raw material is 2.18, which is in the range 2-5 of Si/Al ratio of chabazite. This indicates that using construction waste to synthesize chabazite is feasible according to the composition of raw materials. Thus, the chabazite was synthesized without adding any Si or Al sources. The materials were crushed, sieved by 100-mesh screen, dried at 378 K for 12 h, and then stored in desiccators. Potassium hydroxide (NaOH) used in the alkaline fusion process is of analytical grade.Table 1
Chemical composition of construction waste.
ComponentsCaOAl2O3SiO2MgOFe2O3OtherMass percentage (wt%)37.2113.5635.744.204.125.17


### 2.2. Preparation of Chabazite

In this study, the chabazites were prepared according to alkali fusion hydrothermal synthesis method. Based on our previous experiments, the raw material and the agents were mixed to make a Si/Al ratio of 2, solid/liquid ratio of 4, and then calcined in a muffle furnace at 823 K for 2 h. The obtained substances were ground, added some deionized water, and stirred continuously for 24 hours. Then, the mixtures were poured into hydrothermal synthesis reactors and put in the oven at 363 K for 24 h to cay crystallize. After that, the mixtures were washed by deionized water until neutral, then filtered, and finally dried to obtain the chabazite.


### 2.3. Characterization of the Samples

The chemical composition of construction waste was measured by XRF (XL3t, Thermo Scientific Niton Co., US). The mineral phase of the raw material and the synthesized chabazite were determined by XRD (PANalytical, Holland). The textual characterization of the samples was analyzed by N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000M analyzer. Before testing, the samples were pretreated at 473 K under vacuum for 4 h. The surface morphology of the samples was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (Nova Nano 400). Prior to the scanning process, the samples were dried and coated with gold under vacuum to improve electron conductivity.


### 2.4. Measurement of Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetics

MB was utilized as the model adsorbate. The adsorption isotherm experiments were carried out using doses of 1 g of samples. 200 mL different concentrations of MB solutions with pH 6, namely 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg L-1, were added, mixed with the samples, and mechanically stirred at 150 rpm for 4 h. The experiments were operated at the temperature of 298 K, 308 K, and 318 K, respectively. The adsorbed amount of MB qe (mg g-1) can be obtained using the following equation.
(1)qe=C0−CeVM,where C0 and Ce are the initial and the equilibrium concentrations of MB in solutions (mg L-1), respectively, V is the volume of MB solution (L), and M is the weight of the adsorbent (g).The adsorption kinetic experiments were carried out as follows. A batch of 500 mL MB solutions of 300 mg L-1 was mixed with 2.5 g adsorbents and then stirred at 150 rpm. After a certain interval of time, the concentration of MB solution was analyzed. The tests were operated at the temperature of 298 K, 308 K, and 318 K, respectively. The adsorbent amount qt (mg g-1) at some time t can be calculated by
(2)qt=C0−CtVM,where Ct represents the concentration of MB in the aqueous phase at time t (mg L-1).Additionally, the removal efficiency (R, %) was also analyzed, which can be calculated by
(3)R=C0−CeC0×100%.


### 2.5. Reusability Procedure

The regeneration experiments were operated to estimate the reusability of the synthesized chabazite. The synthesized sample was added to MB solution (300 mg L-1) with the solid/liquid ratio of 1 : 50 at 298 K and stirred at 150 rpm for 4 h. After the adsorption process, the MB-loaded chabazite was filtered and collected for regeneration. The sample was calcined in muffle furnace at 823 K for 1 h and then cooled down to room temperature for the next cycle.


## 2.1. Materials

Construction waste used as raw material was collected from the remnants of rural demolition and relocation around Zhengzhou, China. The main components of construction waste are listed in Table1. It can be seen that the main components of construction waste are CaO, SiO2, and Al2O3. The content of CaO is the highest, mainly because the construction waste contains a lot of cement. Moreover, CaO can provide alkaline environment, which is conducive to the activation of construction waste in the preparation process. SiO2 and Al2O3 can be silicon and aluminium sources for the preparation of chabazite. The Si/Al ratio of the raw material is 2.18, which is in the range 2-5 of Si/Al ratio of chabazite. This indicates that using construction waste to synthesize chabazite is feasible according to the composition of raw materials. Thus, the chabazite was synthesized without adding any Si or Al sources. The materials were crushed, sieved by 100-mesh screen, dried at 378 K for 12 h, and then stored in desiccators. Potassium hydroxide (NaOH) used in the alkaline fusion process is of analytical grade.Table 1
Chemical composition of construction waste.
ComponentsCaOAl2O3SiO2MgOFe2O3OtherMass percentage (wt%)37.2113.5635.744.204.125.17


## 2.2. Preparation of Chabazite

In this study, the chabazites were prepared according to alkali fusion hydrothermal synthesis method. Based on our previous experiments, the raw material and the agents were mixed to make a Si/Al ratio of 2, solid/liquid ratio of 4, and then calcined in a muffle furnace at 823 K for 2 h. The obtained substances were ground, added some deionized water, and stirred continuously for 24 hours. Then, the mixtures were poured into hydrothermal synthesis reactors and put in the oven at 363 K for 24 h to cay crystallize. After that, the mixtures were washed by deionized water until neutral, then filtered, and finally dried to obtain the chabazite.


## 2.3. Characterization of the Samples

The chemical composition of construction waste was measured by XRF (XL3t, Thermo Scientific Niton Co., US). The mineral phase of the raw material and the synthesized chabazite were determined by XRD (PANalytical, Holland). The textual characterization of the samples was analyzed by N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000M analyzer. Before testing, the samples were pretreated at 473 K under vacuum for 4 h. The surface morphology of the samples was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (Nova Nano 400). Prior to the scanning process, the samples were dried and coated with gold under vacuum to improve electron conductivity.


## 2.4. Measurement of Adsorption Isotherms and Kinetics

MB was utilized as the model adsorbate. The adsorption isotherm experiments were carried out using doses of 1 g of samples. 200 mL different concentrations of MB solutions with pH 6, namely 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 mg L-1, were added, mixed with the samples, and mechanically stirred at 150 rpm for 4 h. The experiments were operated at the temperature of 298 K, 308 K, and 318 K, respectively. The adsorbed amount of MB qe (mg g-1) can be obtained using the following equation.
(1)qe=C0−CeVM,where C0 and Ce are the initial and the equilibrium concentrations of MB in solutions (mg L-1), respectively, V is the volume of MB solution (L), and M is the weight of the adsorbent (g).The adsorption kinetic experiments were carried out as follows. A batch of 500 mL MB solutions of 300 mg L-1 was mixed with 2.5 g adsorbents and then stirred at 150 rpm. After a certain interval of time, the concentration of MB solution was analyzed. The tests were operated at the temperature of 298 K, 308 K, and 318 K, respectively. The adsorbent amount qt (mg g-1) at some time t can be calculated by
(2)qt=C0−CtVM,where Ct represents the concentration of MB in the aqueous phase at time t (mg L-1).Additionally, the removal efficiency (R, %) was also analyzed, which can be calculated by
(3)R=C0−CeC0×100%.


## 2.5. Reusability Procedure

The regeneration experiments were operated to estimate the reusability of the synthesized chabazite. The synthesized sample was added to MB solution (300 mg L-1) with the solid/liquid ratio of 1 : 50 at 298 K and stirred at 150 rpm for 4 h. After the adsorption process, the MB-loaded chabazite was filtered and collected for regeneration. The sample was calcined in muffle furnace at 823 K for 1 h and then cooled down to room temperature for the next cycle.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Characterization of Materials

Figure1 shows the appearance of the powders of construction waste and synthesized chabazite. According to Figure 1, construction waste is gray, while the synthesized chabazite is white.Figure 1
Pictures of (a) construction waste and (b) synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)It can be known from Figure2 that the crystalline phases of the construction waste mainly consist of mullite, quartz, and a few amorphous substances. Among those, mullite, the major component of which is SiO2 and Al2O3, is a high temperature-resistant silicate mineral with columnar or acicular crystals. The main composition of quartz is SiO2. Though SiO2 and Al2O3 are abundant in mullite and quartz of the construction waste, their activation is low. Thus, it is necessary to take some measures to destroy the crystalline phase so that aluminium and silicate can be released to activate the construction waste. Usually, alkaline matters, such as NaOH which was utilized in this study, can be activators. Moreover, CaO in the raw materials also can provide alkaline environment. The reaction equation of silica and alumina with NaOH is as follows.
(4)SiO22NaOH=Na2SiO3+H2O,Al2O3+2NaOH=2NaAlO2+H2O.Figure 2
XRD patterns of construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)Compared with the standard peaks of chabazite (PDF #44-0250) and other results in the previous literatures [12, 16, 17], Figure 2(b) shows the typical characteristic peaks of chabazite. In particular, the significant peaks at around 13°, 22°, 30°, and 39° indicate the specific cage structure comprising a representative zeolite skeleton [18].The FTIR spectra of construction waste and chabazite samples, which are significantly different, are illustrated in Figure3. For chabazite, the bands at 3440 cm-1 are related to the vibration of OH-stretching, and the latter is corresponding to the OH-stretching group of Al(OH)3 [19–21]. The peak at 1637 can be assigned to the bending mode of water molecules [17]. The new peak at 1496 cm-1 indicates the asymmetric Al-O stretching in the six-coordinate AlO6 group [16]. The strong peak at 991 cm-1 is attribute to the asymmetric Si-O-Si and Si-O-Al stretching vibration or SiO4 tetrahedron stretching vibration in the structure of chabazite [17, 22, 23]. The Si-O-Si symmetric stretching vibration and bending vibration in the chabazite cage at 671 cm-1 are a characteristic for chabazite [16, 17]. The peak at 454 cm-1 is related to the vibration of the double six-membered ring and the O-Si-O bending vibration, suggesting that the pore structure made up of rings in the synthesized chabazite is intact [22, 24].Figure 3
FTIR spectra of construction waste and chabazite.N2 adsorption/desorption curves of construction waste and chabazite at 77 K are shown in Figure 4. According to the classification of IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied chemistry), the adsorbed curves of construction waste and chabazite belong to type IV. This suggests that the adsorbents are not microporous. Small hysteresis hoops that occur at the relative pressure above 0.2 belong to H3, which indicates the existence of the mesopore. Moreover, IUPAC classified the pore into three types: micropore with the porediameter<2nm, mesopore with the pore diameter range of 2-50 nm, and macropore with the porediameter>50nm. From Figure 5, it can be seen obviously that the pore sizes of the samples are both larger than 2 nm, manifesting that there are less micropore in construction waste and chabazite. The pores of the synthesized chabazite are mainly concentrated in a diameter of about 4 nm and 10 nm, and the volume of the corresponding pores is also large.Figure 4
N2 adsorption/desorption curves of construction waste and chabazite at 77 K.Figure 5
Pore structure distribution of construction waste and chabazite.The pore structure parameters of construction waste and synthesized chabazite are given in Table2. The results show that the specific surface area of construction waste is just 29.21 m2 g-1 and the corresponding total pore volume is 0.166 cm3 g-1 However, the synthesized chabazite has a larger specific surface area of 421.34 m2∙g-1 and a larger total pore volume of 1.391 cm3∙g-1, which are about 20 times and 60 times larger than that of construction waste, respectively. This is consistent with the results obtained from Figures 3 and 4. Ma prepared zeolite 4A by coal fly ash, the specific surface area and total pore volume of which were 48.36 m2 g-1 and 0.0910 cm3 g-1 [25]. Che et al. prepared three kinds of chabazite with a Si/Al ratio of 2.2 by hydrothermal synthesis, namely KCHA, MgCHA, and NH4CHA, the specific surface area of which was 20.2, 531.9, and 76.6 m2 g-1, respectively [26]. Ghasemi et al. measured the surface area of coal fly ash, and the corresponding synthesized Na-P1 zeolite under optimized condition was 16.32 and 41.52 m2 g-1 [27]. Meng et al. prepared Na-P zeolite from epidesmine by a hydrothermal method, the BET surface area of which was 17.136 m2 g-1 and the total pore volume was 0.006845 cm3 g-1 [28]. Compared with the zeolites mentioned above, the synthesized chabazite in this study has a better textual structure.Table 2
Pore structure of construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
SampleSBET(m2 g-1)Smicro(m2 g-1)Vtotal(cm3 g-1)Vmicro(cm3 g-1)Vmeso(cm3 g-1)Vmacro(cm3 g-1)Construction waste29.2100.16600.1610.005Chabazite421.434.891.3910.0031.3870.001


### 3.2. Adsorption Properties

#### 3.2.1. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption isotherms of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are illustrated in Figure6. The adsorbed amount increases rapidly when the initial concentration of MB solutions increases at a relative low range. It can be explained that in the beginning, the low adsorbed amount resulted from the limitation of the low MB concentration in the aqueous solution [29]. The increasing adsorbed amount is caused by the increment of adsorption driving force, namely concentration gradient of MB which can decrease the mass transfer resistance [30, 31]. However, the variation trend of adsorbed amount decreases gradually with the increasing initial concentrations. This is mainly because when the concentration of MB becomes high, the strong adsorption sites are surrounded by more MB ions. As the adsorption is in process, almost all the active sites were occupied, and further increase of MB concentration will not contribute to the adsorption of more MB ions [29]. Besides, the adsorbed amount on the two samples decreases as temperature becomes higher. This is mostly due to the exothermic nature of the adsorption process. As the temperature increases, the surface adsorption energy and molecular diffusion rate become larger [32, 33], and the adsorbed MB molecules become unstable, which reduces the adsorption capacity of the adsorbents. Similar observations have also been reported for other types of zeolites and adsorbents [29, 34]. It indicates that the higher the temperature, the worse the adsorption. Figure 7 shows the removal of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the MB removal rate by chabazite exceeds 80% at low initial concentration and still goes beyond 65% at high initial concentration, while that by construction waste is always below 40%. This implies that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent removal effect on MB. Moreover, the removal rate decreases with the initial concentration of MB increasing, which is due to the limited number of adsorption site.Figure 6
Adsorption isotherms of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Removal of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
(a)(b)(c)The study of adsorption isotherms not only has significant effect on understanding the adsorption process and describing adsorption phenomena but also plays a guiding role in applying the adsorbents largely and massively [35, 36]. A variety of adsorption models have been used to describe the adsorption isotherms, such as the Langmuir [37], Freundlich [34], Henry [38], Sips and Toth models [32]. Among these models, the Langmuir and Freundlich models have been utilized widely due to the simplicity.The Langmuir model is based on the theory that the adsorbate layer adsorbed on the solid surface belongs to a monolayer pattern [39]. The adsorption energy is constant, and there is no interaction among the adsorbate molecules. The equation of this model is presented by
(5)qe=qmKLCe1+KLCe,where qm is the maximum adsorption capacity of adsorbate on the adsorbent (mg g-1) and KL represents the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mg-1).The Freundlich model, which is an empirical equation, assumes that the adsorption reaction occurs on the heterogeneous surfaces and that the number of sites is nonconstant [40]. The equation of this model can be represented by
(6)qe=KFCe1nF,where KF (mg g-1) and 1/nF (L mg-1) are the Freundlich characteristic constants, which represent the adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively [41].Parameters fitted by the Langmuir and Freundlich models at different temperatures on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are displayed in Table3.Table 3
Fitting parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich models of MB adsorption isotherms on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleTemperatureKLangmuirFreundlichqmKLR2KFnFR2(mg g-1)(L mg-1)(mg g-1)(L mg-1)Construction waste2988.360.01480.97961.293.50720.94133088.130.01230.98911.033.20310.93373187.970.01000.98880.802.89700.9165Chabazite298129.180.01760.99716.931.88540.9291308118.130.01500.96635.841.88900.9557318106.280.01270.99804.861.89500.9747Comparing the experimental data and the fitted data, it can be concluded that both the Langmuir and Freundlich models can fit well the experimental data of adsorption about MB on the samples. According to the higher values ofR2 in Table 3, the Langmuir model described the adsorption isotherms more accurately, which indicates that the samples have a uniform surface and uniformly distributed adsorption sites [42]. Thus, only the Langmuir model fitting lines are illustrated in Figure 6, and the corresponding analysis was operated in the following. Both the adsorption capacity and adsorbed constant of MB on the adsorbents obtained by the Langmuir model decrease with an increase of temperature, indicating that the adsorption process is exothermic. The maximum adsorption capacity of construction waste at 298 K is only 8.36 mg g-1, while that of the synthesized chabazite reaches up to 129.18 mg g-1, which is more than 15 times that of construction waste. This is mainly because the specific surface area and pore volume of the synthesized chabazite are much larger than that of the construction waste, which is conductive to the adsorption of MB. The Langmuir constant KL represents the adsorption affinity related to the binding strength between the adsorbate and adsorbent [43, 44]. The higher the KL is, the stronger the adsorption ability of the adsorbent is. Based on Table 3, the Langmuir constant KL increases with the rising temperature, suggesting the adsorption affinity decreases gradually. In addition, the value of KL of the synthesized chabazite is larger than that of construction waste at the same temperature, indicating the interaction force of MB with the synthesized chabazite is stronger than that of MB with construction waste. Previously, some researchers studied the adsorption of MB on various powder adsorbents, such as zeolite [45, 46], coal fly ash [47–49], and carbonaceous adsorbents [50–52]. By comparison of the results obtained in this study with those in the previous literatures in Table 4, it can be concluded that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent adsorption capacity, manifesting the feasibility of preparing chabazite from construction waste.Table 4
Maximum MB adsorption capacity of different powdery adsorbents reported in literature.
AdsorbentTemperatureKqe (Langmuir model)(mg g-1)ReferenceNi/Co USY zeolite29859.880[45]Ni/Co (γAl-Si) zeolite29843.859[45]Acid-treated zeolite2982.113[46]Base-treated zeolite2981.089[46]Acid-treated coal fly ash2988.0[47]Coal fly ash geopolymer30338.4[48]Coal fly ash geopolymer29850-51.4[49]Carbon nanotubes29846.2[30]Acrylic fiber waste-based activated carbon web3037.60-9.92[50]Palm shell waste-based activated carbonRoom temperature218.6[51]Chabazite from construction waste298129.18This work308118.13318106.28


#### 3.2.2. Adsorption Kinetics

Figure8 illustrates the variation of MB solution before and after the adsorption process by construction waste and synthesized chabazite for 1 h and 3 h, respectively. It can be seen clearly that when the adsorption process was carried out for the same time, the color of MB solution adsorbed by synthesized chabazite was lighter. That means that the adsorption effect by the synthesized chabazite is better. Besides, the color of MB solution after adsorption for 1 h is a little different from that after 3 h, suggesting that the major adsorption occurred in the initial 60 min. Figure 9 depicts the adsorption kinetic curves of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the removal rate of MB reaches more than 90%, and the adsorbed amount is about 35 mg g-1 at 1 h at 298 K; after that, the adsorption rate and adsorbed amount become slow. This is mainly because at the beginning, the quick adsorption process is controlled by electrostatic attraction, while in the following stage, the adsorption process is controlled by the van der Waals force [52]. Moreover, the availability of the adsorption sites gradually decreases as the adsorption progresses, so that the adsorbed amount reaches the maximum, namely the adsorption process approaches equilibrium [53].Figure 8
MB solution before and after of the adsorption by construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 9
Adsorption kinetic curves of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite and (c) intraparticle diffusion model curves on chabazite.
(a)(b)(c)Adsorption kinetics can reflect the potential controlling steps and the adsorption mechanism, which was necessary for designing a practical adsorption system. In this study, pseudo-first-order kinetic [54], pseudo-second-order kinetic [55], and intraparticle diffusion [29] models were adopted to describe the kinetic data. The corresponding expressions are as follows:The pseudo-first-order kinetic model isqt=qe1−e−k1t,where qt is the amount of gas adsorbed at time t (mg g-1), t is the adsorption time (min), qe is the amount at adsorption equilibrium (mg g-1), and k1 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetics (min-1).The pseudo-second-order kinetic model is(7)qt=k2qe21+k2qe,where k2 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-second-order kinetics, g∙(mg min)-1.The intraparticle diffusion model is(8)qt=k3t0.5+C,where k3 is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant, mg∙(g min0.5)-1, and C is the intercept.The adsorption kinetic parameters fitted by the three different common models are listed in Table5.Table 5
Parameters of dynamic models of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
ModelParameterConstruction wasteChabazite298 K308 K318 K298 K308 K318 KPseudo-first-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.514.984.5732.2330.5428.79k1 (min-1)0.2180.2100.1780.8810.8670.991R20.80630.82900.86770.85830.88590.8494Pseudo-second-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.895.324.9134.0632.2230.49k2, g∙(mg min)-10.0530.0550.0590.0350.0370.041R20.93870.94870.96180.94020.94690.9341Intraparticle diffusionk3, mg∙(g min0.5)-10.2980.2690.2591.1351.0410.984C2.8262.5392.17023.95622.87321.749R20.83530.81950.81130.8940.86550.8611Experimental dataqe (mg g-1)6.125.515.0236.7834.3932.50According to Table5, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model can describe the adsorption process well for the entire adsorption period with higher values of R2 and lower deviation of qe between the experimental data and the calculated data. This suggests that the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite might depend on the availability of the adsorption sites. Similar phenomena have been reported for MB adsorption on kaolin and zeolite [56], carbon nanotubes [30], and activated carbon spheres [41]. It indicates that the rate-limiting step may be related to the dye chemisorption [56]. The values of k2 and the corresponding qe increase and decrease with the temperature, respectively, suggesting that rising the temperature increases the adsorption rate but reduces adsorption capacity. In addition, based on Figure 9(c), the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite fitted by the intraparticle diffusion model includes three linear segments [42]. This suggests that there are three rate-controlling steps in the adsorption process. The first one is the membrane diffusion process, during which the MB molecules transfer from the solution to the surface of the synthesized chabazite. The second step is the representative of internal particle diffusion. And the third one corresponds to the adsorption equilibrium.


#### 3.2.3. Thermodynamic Parameters

Thermodynamic parameters can represent spontaneity and heat change processes. The thermodynamic parameters enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) were calculated as follows [30, 57].
(9)lnKL=ΔSR−ΔHRT,ΔG=ΔH−TΔS,where KL is the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mol-1), R is the gas constant, (8.314 J mol-1 K-1), and T is the solution temperature (K).A straight line can be drawn by plottinglnKL against 1/T, and then, ΔH and ΔS can be determined from the slope and the intercept. Thermodynamic parameters at various temperatures are listed in Table 6.Table 6
Thermodynamic parameters of MB adsorption on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleΔH (kJ mol-1)ΔS (J mol-1 K-1)ΔG (kJ mol-1)298 K308 K318 KConstruction waste-15.45-37.55-4.26-3.88-3.50Chabazite-12.83-27.37-4.68-4.40-4.13The negative values ofΔH indicate that the adsorption process on both construction waste and the synthesized chabazite is exothermic. Kara et al. [58] mentioned that the ΔH value is lower than 40 kJ mol-1 with physisorption. Hence, the results suggest that the adsorption processes of MB on the adsorbents in this study are the physisorption process. It means that the interaction force between MB molecular and the surface of the adsorbents may be ascribed to the van der Waals forces and electrostatic attractions [56]. The values of ΔS are also negative, illustrating a decrease in disorderliness during the adsorption [59]. This is because the molecules of MB are adsorbed on the adsorbents, reducing the degree of freedom and making the system tend to be orderly [53]. Moreover, the negative values of ΔG confirm the feasibility of the process and the spontaneous nature of the adsorption. The absolute ΔG value of MB on the synthesized chabazite is larger than that on the construction waste, implying that the spontaneity degree of adsorption on the chabazite is higher, namely, the molecules on MB could be adsorbed more easily [53]. Besides, the absolute ΔG values decrease with the increasing temperature, suggesting that high temperature is not conducive to the adsorption process. This is consistent with the results obtained by adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.


### 3.3. Regeneration and Reusability

Regeneration is an important aspect for the adsorbent. High-temperature calcination is a useful method to remove MB to regenerate the adsorbent. Seven adsorption-regeneration cycles were operated, and the results are shown in Figure10. The adsorption capacity is almost constant, with only decreasing by 0.8% and 1.7% after the first and seventh regeneration, respectively. This is because most of MB is oxidized to degrade at high temperature and only few amounts inorganic salt impurities in MB remain, in which some are difficult to oxidize and degrade [60]. Thus, the pore structure of the chabazite is recovered and can be reused almost as the initial adsorbent. This method can remove the adsorbed MB and will not cause secondary pollution to the environment.Figure 10
Reusability of chabazite for MB removal.


## 3.1. Characterization of Materials

Figure1 shows the appearance of the powders of construction waste and synthesized chabazite. According to Figure 1, construction waste is gray, while the synthesized chabazite is white.Figure 1
Pictures of (a) construction waste and (b) synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)It can be known from Figure2 that the crystalline phases of the construction waste mainly consist of mullite, quartz, and a few amorphous substances. Among those, mullite, the major component of which is SiO2 and Al2O3, is a high temperature-resistant silicate mineral with columnar or acicular crystals. The main composition of quartz is SiO2. Though SiO2 and Al2O3 are abundant in mullite and quartz of the construction waste, their activation is low. Thus, it is necessary to take some measures to destroy the crystalline phase so that aluminium and silicate can be released to activate the construction waste. Usually, alkaline matters, such as NaOH which was utilized in this study, can be activators. Moreover, CaO in the raw materials also can provide alkaline environment. The reaction equation of silica and alumina with NaOH is as follows.
(4)SiO22NaOH=Na2SiO3+H2O,Al2O3+2NaOH=2NaAlO2+H2O.Figure 2
XRD patterns of construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)Compared with the standard peaks of chabazite (PDF #44-0250) and other results in the previous literatures [12, 16, 17], Figure 2(b) shows the typical characteristic peaks of chabazite. In particular, the significant peaks at around 13°, 22°, 30°, and 39° indicate the specific cage structure comprising a representative zeolite skeleton [18].The FTIR spectra of construction waste and chabazite samples, which are significantly different, are illustrated in Figure3. For chabazite, the bands at 3440 cm-1 are related to the vibration of OH-stretching, and the latter is corresponding to the OH-stretching group of Al(OH)3 [19–21]. The peak at 1637 can be assigned to the bending mode of water molecules [17]. The new peak at 1496 cm-1 indicates the asymmetric Al-O stretching in the six-coordinate AlO6 group [16]. The strong peak at 991 cm-1 is attribute to the asymmetric Si-O-Si and Si-O-Al stretching vibration or SiO4 tetrahedron stretching vibration in the structure of chabazite [17, 22, 23]. The Si-O-Si symmetric stretching vibration and bending vibration in the chabazite cage at 671 cm-1 are a characteristic for chabazite [16, 17]. The peak at 454 cm-1 is related to the vibration of the double six-membered ring and the O-Si-O bending vibration, suggesting that the pore structure made up of rings in the synthesized chabazite is intact [22, 24].Figure 3
FTIR spectra of construction waste and chabazite.N2 adsorption/desorption curves of construction waste and chabazite at 77 K are shown in Figure 4. According to the classification of IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied chemistry), the adsorbed curves of construction waste and chabazite belong to type IV. This suggests that the adsorbents are not microporous. Small hysteresis hoops that occur at the relative pressure above 0.2 belong to H3, which indicates the existence of the mesopore. Moreover, IUPAC classified the pore into three types: micropore with the porediameter<2nm, mesopore with the pore diameter range of 2-50 nm, and macropore with the porediameter>50nm. From Figure 5, it can be seen obviously that the pore sizes of the samples are both larger than 2 nm, manifesting that there are less micropore in construction waste and chabazite. The pores of the synthesized chabazite are mainly concentrated in a diameter of about 4 nm and 10 nm, and the volume of the corresponding pores is also large.Figure 4
N2 adsorption/desorption curves of construction waste and chabazite at 77 K.Figure 5
Pore structure distribution of construction waste and chabazite.The pore structure parameters of construction waste and synthesized chabazite are given in Table2. The results show that the specific surface area of construction waste is just 29.21 m2 g-1 and the corresponding total pore volume is 0.166 cm3 g-1 However, the synthesized chabazite has a larger specific surface area of 421.34 m2∙g-1 and a larger total pore volume of 1.391 cm3∙g-1, which are about 20 times and 60 times larger than that of construction waste, respectively. This is consistent with the results obtained from Figures 3 and 4. Ma prepared zeolite 4A by coal fly ash, the specific surface area and total pore volume of which were 48.36 m2 g-1 and 0.0910 cm3 g-1 [25]. Che et al. prepared three kinds of chabazite with a Si/Al ratio of 2.2 by hydrothermal synthesis, namely KCHA, MgCHA, and NH4CHA, the specific surface area of which was 20.2, 531.9, and 76.6 m2 g-1, respectively [26]. Ghasemi et al. measured the surface area of coal fly ash, and the corresponding synthesized Na-P1 zeolite under optimized condition was 16.32 and 41.52 m2 g-1 [27]. Meng et al. prepared Na-P zeolite from epidesmine by a hydrothermal method, the BET surface area of which was 17.136 m2 g-1 and the total pore volume was 0.006845 cm3 g-1 [28]. Compared with the zeolites mentioned above, the synthesized chabazite in this study has a better textual structure.Table 2
Pore structure of construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
SampleSBET(m2 g-1)Smicro(m2 g-1)Vtotal(cm3 g-1)Vmicro(cm3 g-1)Vmeso(cm3 g-1)Vmacro(cm3 g-1)Construction waste29.2100.16600.1610.005Chabazite421.434.891.3910.0031.3870.001


## 3.2. Adsorption Properties

### 3.2.1. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption isotherms of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are illustrated in Figure6. The adsorbed amount increases rapidly when the initial concentration of MB solutions increases at a relative low range. It can be explained that in the beginning, the low adsorbed amount resulted from the limitation of the low MB concentration in the aqueous solution [29]. The increasing adsorbed amount is caused by the increment of adsorption driving force, namely concentration gradient of MB which can decrease the mass transfer resistance [30, 31]. However, the variation trend of adsorbed amount decreases gradually with the increasing initial concentrations. This is mainly because when the concentration of MB becomes high, the strong adsorption sites are surrounded by more MB ions. As the adsorption is in process, almost all the active sites were occupied, and further increase of MB concentration will not contribute to the adsorption of more MB ions [29]. Besides, the adsorbed amount on the two samples decreases as temperature becomes higher. This is mostly due to the exothermic nature of the adsorption process. As the temperature increases, the surface adsorption energy and molecular diffusion rate become larger [32, 33], and the adsorbed MB molecules become unstable, which reduces the adsorption capacity of the adsorbents. Similar observations have also been reported for other types of zeolites and adsorbents [29, 34]. It indicates that the higher the temperature, the worse the adsorption. Figure 7 shows the removal of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the MB removal rate by chabazite exceeds 80% at low initial concentration and still goes beyond 65% at high initial concentration, while that by construction waste is always below 40%. This implies that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent removal effect on MB. Moreover, the removal rate decreases with the initial concentration of MB increasing, which is due to the limited number of adsorption site.Figure 6
Adsorption isotherms of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Removal of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
(a)(b)(c)The study of adsorption isotherms not only has significant effect on understanding the adsorption process and describing adsorption phenomena but also plays a guiding role in applying the adsorbents largely and massively [35, 36]. A variety of adsorption models have been used to describe the adsorption isotherms, such as the Langmuir [37], Freundlich [34], Henry [38], Sips and Toth models [32]. Among these models, the Langmuir and Freundlich models have been utilized widely due to the simplicity.The Langmuir model is based on the theory that the adsorbate layer adsorbed on the solid surface belongs to a monolayer pattern [39]. The adsorption energy is constant, and there is no interaction among the adsorbate molecules. The equation of this model is presented by
(5)qe=qmKLCe1+KLCe,where qm is the maximum adsorption capacity of adsorbate on the adsorbent (mg g-1) and KL represents the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mg-1).The Freundlich model, which is an empirical equation, assumes that the adsorption reaction occurs on the heterogeneous surfaces and that the number of sites is nonconstant [40]. The equation of this model can be represented by
(6)qe=KFCe1nF,where KF (mg g-1) and 1/nF (L mg-1) are the Freundlich characteristic constants, which represent the adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively [41].Parameters fitted by the Langmuir and Freundlich models at different temperatures on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are displayed in Table3.Table 3
Fitting parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich models of MB adsorption isotherms on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleTemperatureKLangmuirFreundlichqmKLR2KFnFR2(mg g-1)(L mg-1)(mg g-1)(L mg-1)Construction waste2988.360.01480.97961.293.50720.94133088.130.01230.98911.033.20310.93373187.970.01000.98880.802.89700.9165Chabazite298129.180.01760.99716.931.88540.9291308118.130.01500.96635.841.88900.9557318106.280.01270.99804.861.89500.9747Comparing the experimental data and the fitted data, it can be concluded that both the Langmuir and Freundlich models can fit well the experimental data of adsorption about MB on the samples. According to the higher values ofR2 in Table 3, the Langmuir model described the adsorption isotherms more accurately, which indicates that the samples have a uniform surface and uniformly distributed adsorption sites [42]. Thus, only the Langmuir model fitting lines are illustrated in Figure 6, and the corresponding analysis was operated in the following. Both the adsorption capacity and adsorbed constant of MB on the adsorbents obtained by the Langmuir model decrease with an increase of temperature, indicating that the adsorption process is exothermic. The maximum adsorption capacity of construction waste at 298 K is only 8.36 mg g-1, while that of the synthesized chabazite reaches up to 129.18 mg g-1, which is more than 15 times that of construction waste. This is mainly because the specific surface area and pore volume of the synthesized chabazite are much larger than that of the construction waste, which is conductive to the adsorption of MB. The Langmuir constant KL represents the adsorption affinity related to the binding strength between the adsorbate and adsorbent [43, 44]. The higher the KL is, the stronger the adsorption ability of the adsorbent is. Based on Table 3, the Langmuir constant KL increases with the rising temperature, suggesting the adsorption affinity decreases gradually. In addition, the value of KL of the synthesized chabazite is larger than that of construction waste at the same temperature, indicating the interaction force of MB with the synthesized chabazite is stronger than that of MB with construction waste. Previously, some researchers studied the adsorption of MB on various powder adsorbents, such as zeolite [45, 46], coal fly ash [47–49], and carbonaceous adsorbents [50–52]. By comparison of the results obtained in this study with those in the previous literatures in Table 4, it can be concluded that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent adsorption capacity, manifesting the feasibility of preparing chabazite from construction waste.Table 4
Maximum MB adsorption capacity of different powdery adsorbents reported in literature.
AdsorbentTemperatureKqe (Langmuir model)(mg g-1)ReferenceNi/Co USY zeolite29859.880[45]Ni/Co (γAl-Si) zeolite29843.859[45]Acid-treated zeolite2982.113[46]Base-treated zeolite2981.089[46]Acid-treated coal fly ash2988.0[47]Coal fly ash geopolymer30338.4[48]Coal fly ash geopolymer29850-51.4[49]Carbon nanotubes29846.2[30]Acrylic fiber waste-based activated carbon web3037.60-9.92[50]Palm shell waste-based activated carbonRoom temperature218.6[51]Chabazite from construction waste298129.18This work308118.13318106.28


### 3.2.2. Adsorption Kinetics

Figure8 illustrates the variation of MB solution before and after the adsorption process by construction waste and synthesized chabazite for 1 h and 3 h, respectively. It can be seen clearly that when the adsorption process was carried out for the same time, the color of MB solution adsorbed by synthesized chabazite was lighter. That means that the adsorption effect by the synthesized chabazite is better. Besides, the color of MB solution after adsorption for 1 h is a little different from that after 3 h, suggesting that the major adsorption occurred in the initial 60 min. Figure 9 depicts the adsorption kinetic curves of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the removal rate of MB reaches more than 90%, and the adsorbed amount is about 35 mg g-1 at 1 h at 298 K; after that, the adsorption rate and adsorbed amount become slow. This is mainly because at the beginning, the quick adsorption process is controlled by electrostatic attraction, while in the following stage, the adsorption process is controlled by the van der Waals force [52]. Moreover, the availability of the adsorption sites gradually decreases as the adsorption progresses, so that the adsorbed amount reaches the maximum, namely the adsorption process approaches equilibrium [53].Figure 8
MB solution before and after of the adsorption by construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 9
Adsorption kinetic curves of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite and (c) intraparticle diffusion model curves on chabazite.
(a)(b)(c)Adsorption kinetics can reflect the potential controlling steps and the adsorption mechanism, which was necessary for designing a practical adsorption system. In this study, pseudo-first-order kinetic [54], pseudo-second-order kinetic [55], and intraparticle diffusion [29] models were adopted to describe the kinetic data. The corresponding expressions are as follows:The pseudo-first-order kinetic model isqt=qe1−e−k1t,where qt is the amount of gas adsorbed at time t (mg g-1), t is the adsorption time (min), qe is the amount at adsorption equilibrium (mg g-1), and k1 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetics (min-1).The pseudo-second-order kinetic model is(7)qt=k2qe21+k2qe,where k2 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-second-order kinetics, g∙(mg min)-1.The intraparticle diffusion model is(8)qt=k3t0.5+C,where k3 is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant, mg∙(g min0.5)-1, and C is the intercept.The adsorption kinetic parameters fitted by the three different common models are listed in Table5.Table 5
Parameters of dynamic models of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
ModelParameterConstruction wasteChabazite298 K308 K318 K298 K308 K318 KPseudo-first-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.514.984.5732.2330.5428.79k1 (min-1)0.2180.2100.1780.8810.8670.991R20.80630.82900.86770.85830.88590.8494Pseudo-second-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.895.324.9134.0632.2230.49k2, g∙(mg min)-10.0530.0550.0590.0350.0370.041R20.93870.94870.96180.94020.94690.9341Intraparticle diffusionk3, mg∙(g min0.5)-10.2980.2690.2591.1351.0410.984C2.8262.5392.17023.95622.87321.749R20.83530.81950.81130.8940.86550.8611Experimental dataqe (mg g-1)6.125.515.0236.7834.3932.50According to Table5, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model can describe the adsorption process well for the entire adsorption period with higher values of R2 and lower deviation of qe between the experimental data and the calculated data. This suggests that the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite might depend on the availability of the adsorption sites. Similar phenomena have been reported for MB adsorption on kaolin and zeolite [56], carbon nanotubes [30], and activated carbon spheres [41]. It indicates that the rate-limiting step may be related to the dye chemisorption [56]. The values of k2 and the corresponding qe increase and decrease with the temperature, respectively, suggesting that rising the temperature increases the adsorption rate but reduces adsorption capacity. In addition, based on Figure 9(c), the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite fitted by the intraparticle diffusion model includes three linear segments [42]. This suggests that there are three rate-controlling steps in the adsorption process. The first one is the membrane diffusion process, during which the MB molecules transfer from the solution to the surface of the synthesized chabazite. The second step is the representative of internal particle diffusion. And the third one corresponds to the adsorption equilibrium.


### 3.2.3. Thermodynamic Parameters

Thermodynamic parameters can represent spontaneity and heat change processes. The thermodynamic parameters enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) were calculated as follows [30, 57].
(9)lnKL=ΔSR−ΔHRT,ΔG=ΔH−TΔS,where KL is the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mol-1), R is the gas constant, (8.314 J mol-1 K-1), and T is the solution temperature (K).A straight line can be drawn by plottinglnKL against 1/T, and then, ΔH and ΔS can be determined from the slope and the intercept. Thermodynamic parameters at various temperatures are listed in Table 6.Table 6
Thermodynamic parameters of MB adsorption on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleΔH (kJ mol-1)ΔS (J mol-1 K-1)ΔG (kJ mol-1)298 K308 K318 KConstruction waste-15.45-37.55-4.26-3.88-3.50Chabazite-12.83-27.37-4.68-4.40-4.13The negative values ofΔH indicate that the adsorption process on both construction waste and the synthesized chabazite is exothermic. Kara et al. [58] mentioned that the ΔH value is lower than 40 kJ mol-1 with physisorption. Hence, the results suggest that the adsorption processes of MB on the adsorbents in this study are the physisorption process. It means that the interaction force between MB molecular and the surface of the adsorbents may be ascribed to the van der Waals forces and electrostatic attractions [56]. The values of ΔS are also negative, illustrating a decrease in disorderliness during the adsorption [59]. This is because the molecules of MB are adsorbed on the adsorbents, reducing the degree of freedom and making the system tend to be orderly [53]. Moreover, the negative values of ΔG confirm the feasibility of the process and the spontaneous nature of the adsorption. The absolute ΔG value of MB on the synthesized chabazite is larger than that on the construction waste, implying that the spontaneity degree of adsorption on the chabazite is higher, namely, the molecules on MB could be adsorbed more easily [53]. Besides, the absolute ΔG values decrease with the increasing temperature, suggesting that high temperature is not conducive to the adsorption process. This is consistent with the results obtained by adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.


## 3.2.1. Adsorption Isotherms

Adsorption isotherms of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are illustrated in Figure6. The adsorbed amount increases rapidly when the initial concentration of MB solutions increases at a relative low range. It can be explained that in the beginning, the low adsorbed amount resulted from the limitation of the low MB concentration in the aqueous solution [29]. The increasing adsorbed amount is caused by the increment of adsorption driving force, namely concentration gradient of MB which can decrease the mass transfer resistance [30, 31]. However, the variation trend of adsorbed amount decreases gradually with the increasing initial concentrations. This is mainly because when the concentration of MB becomes high, the strong adsorption sites are surrounded by more MB ions. As the adsorption is in process, almost all the active sites were occupied, and further increase of MB concentration will not contribute to the adsorption of more MB ions [29]. Besides, the adsorbed amount on the two samples decreases as temperature becomes higher. This is mostly due to the exothermic nature of the adsorption process. As the temperature increases, the surface adsorption energy and molecular diffusion rate become larger [32, 33], and the adsorbed MB molecules become unstable, which reduces the adsorption capacity of the adsorbents. Similar observations have also been reported for other types of zeolites and adsorbents [29, 34]. It indicates that the higher the temperature, the worse the adsorption. Figure 7 shows the removal of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the MB removal rate by chabazite exceeds 80% at low initial concentration and still goes beyond 65% at high initial concentration, while that by construction waste is always below 40%. This implies that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent removal effect on MB. Moreover, the removal rate decreases with the initial concentration of MB increasing, which is due to the limited number of adsorption site.Figure 6
Adsorption isotherms of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 7
Removal of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
(a)(b)(c)The study of adsorption isotherms not only has significant effect on understanding the adsorption process and describing adsorption phenomena but also plays a guiding role in applying the adsorbents largely and massively [35, 36]. A variety of adsorption models have been used to describe the adsorption isotherms, such as the Langmuir [37], Freundlich [34], Henry [38], Sips and Toth models [32]. Among these models, the Langmuir and Freundlich models have been utilized widely due to the simplicity.The Langmuir model is based on the theory that the adsorbate layer adsorbed on the solid surface belongs to a monolayer pattern [39]. The adsorption energy is constant, and there is no interaction among the adsorbate molecules. The equation of this model is presented by
(5)qe=qmKLCe1+KLCe,where qm is the maximum adsorption capacity of adsorbate on the adsorbent (mg g-1) and KL represents the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mg-1).The Freundlich model, which is an empirical equation, assumes that the adsorption reaction occurs on the heterogeneous surfaces and that the number of sites is nonconstant [40]. The equation of this model can be represented by
(6)qe=KFCe1nF,where KF (mg g-1) and 1/nF (L mg-1) are the Freundlich characteristic constants, which represent the adsorption capacity and intensity, respectively [41].Parameters fitted by the Langmuir and Freundlich models at different temperatures on construction waste and synthesized chabazite are displayed in Table3.Table 3
Fitting parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich models of MB adsorption isotherms on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleTemperatureKLangmuirFreundlichqmKLR2KFnFR2(mg g-1)(L mg-1)(mg g-1)(L mg-1)Construction waste2988.360.01480.97961.293.50720.94133088.130.01230.98911.033.20310.93373187.970.01000.98880.802.89700.9165Chabazite298129.180.01760.99716.931.88540.9291308118.130.01500.96635.841.88900.9557318106.280.01270.99804.861.89500.9747Comparing the experimental data and the fitted data, it can be concluded that both the Langmuir and Freundlich models can fit well the experimental data of adsorption about MB on the samples. According to the higher values ofR2 in Table 3, the Langmuir model described the adsorption isotherms more accurately, which indicates that the samples have a uniform surface and uniformly distributed adsorption sites [42]. Thus, only the Langmuir model fitting lines are illustrated in Figure 6, and the corresponding analysis was operated in the following. Both the adsorption capacity and adsorbed constant of MB on the adsorbents obtained by the Langmuir model decrease with an increase of temperature, indicating that the adsorption process is exothermic. The maximum adsorption capacity of construction waste at 298 K is only 8.36 mg g-1, while that of the synthesized chabazite reaches up to 129.18 mg g-1, which is more than 15 times that of construction waste. This is mainly because the specific surface area and pore volume of the synthesized chabazite are much larger than that of the construction waste, which is conductive to the adsorption of MB. The Langmuir constant KL represents the adsorption affinity related to the binding strength between the adsorbate and adsorbent [43, 44]. The higher the KL is, the stronger the adsorption ability of the adsorbent is. Based on Table 3, the Langmuir constant KL increases with the rising temperature, suggesting the adsorption affinity decreases gradually. In addition, the value of KL of the synthesized chabazite is larger than that of construction waste at the same temperature, indicating the interaction force of MB with the synthesized chabazite is stronger than that of MB with construction waste. Previously, some researchers studied the adsorption of MB on various powder adsorbents, such as zeolite [45, 46], coal fly ash [47–49], and carbonaceous adsorbents [50–52]. By comparison of the results obtained in this study with those in the previous literatures in Table 4, it can be concluded that the synthesized chabazite has an excellent adsorption capacity, manifesting the feasibility of preparing chabazite from construction waste.Table 4
Maximum MB adsorption capacity of different powdery adsorbents reported in literature.
AdsorbentTemperatureKqe (Langmuir model)(mg g-1)ReferenceNi/Co USY zeolite29859.880[45]Ni/Co (γAl-Si) zeolite29843.859[45]Acid-treated zeolite2982.113[46]Base-treated zeolite2981.089[46]Acid-treated coal fly ash2988.0[47]Coal fly ash geopolymer30338.4[48]Coal fly ash geopolymer29850-51.4[49]Carbon nanotubes29846.2[30]Acrylic fiber waste-based activated carbon web3037.60-9.92[50]Palm shell waste-based activated carbonRoom temperature218.6[51]Chabazite from construction waste298129.18This work308118.13318106.28


## 3.2.2. Adsorption Kinetics

Figure8 illustrates the variation of MB solution before and after the adsorption process by construction waste and synthesized chabazite for 1 h and 3 h, respectively. It can be seen clearly that when the adsorption process was carried out for the same time, the color of MB solution adsorbed by synthesized chabazite was lighter. That means that the adsorption effect by the synthesized chabazite is better. Besides, the color of MB solution after adsorption for 1 h is a little different from that after 3 h, suggesting that the major adsorption occurred in the initial 60 min. Figure 9 depicts the adsorption kinetic curves of MB on construction waste and synthesized chabazite. It can be seen that the removal rate of MB reaches more than 90%, and the adsorbed amount is about 35 mg g-1 at 1 h at 298 K; after that, the adsorption rate and adsorbed amount become slow. This is mainly because at the beginning, the quick adsorption process is controlled by electrostatic attraction, while in the following stage, the adsorption process is controlled by the van der Waals force [52]. Moreover, the availability of the adsorption sites gradually decreases as the adsorption progresses, so that the adsorbed amount reaches the maximum, namely the adsorption process approaches equilibrium [53].Figure 8
MB solution before and after of the adsorption by construction waste and synthesized chabazite.
(a)(b)Figure 9
Adsorption kinetic curves of MB on (a) construction waste and (b) chabazite and (c) intraparticle diffusion model curves on chabazite.
(a)(b)(c)Adsorption kinetics can reflect the potential controlling steps and the adsorption mechanism, which was necessary for designing a practical adsorption system. In this study, pseudo-first-order kinetic [54], pseudo-second-order kinetic [55], and intraparticle diffusion [29] models were adopted to describe the kinetic data. The corresponding expressions are as follows:The pseudo-first-order kinetic model isqt=qe1−e−k1t,where qt is the amount of gas adsorbed at time t (mg g-1), t is the adsorption time (min), qe is the amount at adsorption equilibrium (mg g-1), and k1 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetics (min-1).The pseudo-second-order kinetic model is(7)qt=k2qe21+k2qe,where k2 is the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-second-order kinetics, g∙(mg min)-1.The intraparticle diffusion model is(8)qt=k3t0.5+C,where k3 is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant, mg∙(g min0.5)-1, and C is the intercept.The adsorption kinetic parameters fitted by the three different common models are listed in Table5.Table 5
Parameters of dynamic models of MB on construction waste and chabazite at different temperatures.
ModelParameterConstruction wasteChabazite298 K308 K318 K298 K308 K318 KPseudo-first-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.514.984.5732.2330.5428.79k1 (min-1)0.2180.2100.1780.8810.8670.991R20.80630.82900.86770.85830.88590.8494Pseudo-second-order kineticqe (mg g-1)5.895.324.9134.0632.2230.49k2, g∙(mg min)-10.0530.0550.0590.0350.0370.041R20.93870.94870.96180.94020.94690.9341Intraparticle diffusionk3, mg∙(g min0.5)-10.2980.2690.2591.1351.0410.984C2.8262.5392.17023.95622.87321.749R20.83530.81950.81130.8940.86550.8611Experimental dataqe (mg g-1)6.125.515.0236.7834.3932.50According to Table5, the pseudo-second-order kinetic model can describe the adsorption process well for the entire adsorption period with higher values of R2 and lower deviation of qe between the experimental data and the calculated data. This suggests that the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite might depend on the availability of the adsorption sites. Similar phenomena have been reported for MB adsorption on kaolin and zeolite [56], carbon nanotubes [30], and activated carbon spheres [41]. It indicates that the rate-limiting step may be related to the dye chemisorption [56]. The values of k2 and the corresponding qe increase and decrease with the temperature, respectively, suggesting that rising the temperature increases the adsorption rate but reduces adsorption capacity. In addition, based on Figure 9(c), the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite fitted by the intraparticle diffusion model includes three linear segments [42]. This suggests that there are three rate-controlling steps in the adsorption process. The first one is the membrane diffusion process, during which the MB molecules transfer from the solution to the surface of the synthesized chabazite. The second step is the representative of internal particle diffusion. And the third one corresponds to the adsorption equilibrium.


## 3.2.3. Thermodynamic Parameters

Thermodynamic parameters can represent spontaneity and heat change processes. The thermodynamic parameters enthalpy (ΔH), entropy (ΔS), and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) were calculated as follows [30, 57].
(9)lnKL=ΔSR−ΔHRT,ΔG=ΔH−TΔS,where KL is the Langmuir adsorption equilibrium constant (L mol-1), R is the gas constant, (8.314 J mol-1 K-1), and T is the solution temperature (K).A straight line can be drawn by plottinglnKL against 1/T, and then, ΔH and ΔS can be determined from the slope and the intercept. Thermodynamic parameters at various temperatures are listed in Table 6.Table 6
Thermodynamic parameters of MB adsorption on construction waste and chabazite.
SampleΔH (kJ mol-1)ΔS (J mol-1 K-1)ΔG (kJ mol-1)298 K308 K318 KConstruction waste-15.45-37.55-4.26-3.88-3.50Chabazite-12.83-27.37-4.68-4.40-4.13The negative values ofΔH indicate that the adsorption process on both construction waste and the synthesized chabazite is exothermic. Kara et al. [58] mentioned that the ΔH value is lower than 40 kJ mol-1 with physisorption. Hence, the results suggest that the adsorption processes of MB on the adsorbents in this study are the physisorption process. It means that the interaction force between MB molecular and the surface of the adsorbents may be ascribed to the van der Waals forces and electrostatic attractions [56]. The values of ΔS are also negative, illustrating a decrease in disorderliness during the adsorption [59]. This is because the molecules of MB are adsorbed on the adsorbents, reducing the degree of freedom and making the system tend to be orderly [53]. Moreover, the negative values of ΔG confirm the feasibility of the process and the spontaneous nature of the adsorption. The absolute ΔG value of MB on the synthesized chabazite is larger than that on the construction waste, implying that the spontaneity degree of adsorption on the chabazite is higher, namely, the molecules on MB could be adsorbed more easily [53]. Besides, the absolute ΔG values decrease with the increasing temperature, suggesting that high temperature is not conducive to the adsorption process. This is consistent with the results obtained by adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.


## 3.3. Regeneration and Reusability

Regeneration is an important aspect for the adsorbent. High-temperature calcination is a useful method to remove MB to regenerate the adsorbent. Seven adsorption-regeneration cycles were operated, and the results are shown in Figure10. The adsorption capacity is almost constant, with only decreasing by 0.8% and 1.7% after the first and seventh regeneration, respectively. This is because most of MB is oxidized to degrade at high temperature and only few amounts inorganic salt impurities in MB remain, in which some are difficult to oxidize and degrade [60]. Thus, the pore structure of the chabazite is recovered and can be reused almost as the initial adsorbent. This method can remove the adsorbed MB and will not cause secondary pollution to the environment.Figure 10
Reusability of chabazite for MB removal.


## 4. Conclusion

Construction waste was utilized as raw material for the preparation of chabazite to apply in water treatment. XRD and FTIR analyses proved the crystalline structure and typical functional groups of synthesized chabazite. According to the results obtained by N2 adsorption/desorption curves at 77 K, the synthesized chabazite has a larger specific surface area of 421.34 m2 g-1 and a larger total pore volume of 1.391 cm3 g-1, suggesting that the chabazite has an excellent textual pore structure. Adsorption studies reveal that the maximum adsorption capacity of MB on the synthesized chabazite is up to 129.18 mg g-1 at 298 K, which is more than 15 times that of construction waste and comparable to that of other powdery adsorbents reported in literature. Furthermore, adsorption kinetic studies show that the major adsorption of MB occur in the initial 60 min and can be well described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results of ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG indicate that the adsorption of MB on the synthesized chabazite is physical, orderliness-tended, and spontaneous process. The synthesized chabazite can be easily regenerated and reused. Based on the outcome of this study, it can be concluded that it is feasible for using construction waste to prepare chabazite, which can be used as an adsorbent.



---

*Source: 9994079-2021-06-25.xml*