# Evaluation of Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of 80% Methanol Crude Extract and Solvent Fractions ofTrichilia dregeana Sond (Meliaceae) Leaves in Mice

Authors: Daniel Gizachew Shewaye; Wubayehu Kahaliw; Tafere Mulaw Belete; Nejat Ahmed
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2023)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. The leaves of Trichilia dregeana Sond are traditionally used to treat wounds. Even though there have been in vitro studies and claims supporting wound healing, there are no scientific data on in vivo wound healing and anti-inflammatory activities of the leaves of T. dregeana. Objective. This study aimed to evaluate wound healing and anti-inflammatory activity of 80% methanol crude extract and solvent fractions of T. dregeana in mice. Method. The leaves of T. dregeana were dried, ground, and macerated with 80% methanol three times successively. The crude extract was fractioned by water, ethyl acetate, and hexane separately. The acute dermal and oral toxicity tests were done by applying 2000 mg/kg of 10% (w/w) crude extract ointment (CEO) topically and 2000 mg/kg of crude extract orally, respectively. The wound healing activity of the crude extract was evaluated on excision, incision, and burn wound models while the fractions were evaluated only on excision wound model. The anti-inflammatory activity of the crude extract was evaluated on xylene-induced ear edema and cotton pellet granuloma tests. Result. Both acute dermal and oral toxicity tests were found to be safe after topical application of 2000 mg/kg of 10% (w/w) CEO and oral administration of 2000 mg/kg of crude extract suspension, respectively. Both 5% and 10% (w/w) CEO produced significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction and period of epithelialization from day 4 onwards as compared to simple ointment (SO) on both excision and burn wounds. The tensile strength was increased significantly (p < 0.001) for the CEO-treated mice as compared to both untreated and SO groups. The crude extract also showed anti-inflammatory activity at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg by inhibiting ear edema, exudate, and granuloma formation as compared to the SO group. Conclusion. The increase in wound contraction, reduction in period of epithelialization, and increase in tensile strength support the traditional claims of T. dregeana for wound healing.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Wound is defined as damage to the integrity of biological tissues, including skin, mucous membranes, and organ tissues, due to various types of trauma [1]. The lost integrity of biological tissues can be restored through a physiologic process called wound healing [2] in which different cellular elements like coagulation cascade and inflammatory pathways and several cells including fibroblasts, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells are involved. The healing process and the regeneration of tissues are happening through coordinated fashion that involves different phases of healing which are hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [3].Trichilia dregeana Sond which is commonly known as Cape Mahogany and Forest Natal Mahogany in South Africa is a large, up to 35 m in height and 1.8 m in diameter, evergreen tree which inhabits forests in high rainfall areas. It has beautiful dark foliage and a large rounded crown from the Meliaceae family [4] (Figure 1). In Ethiopia, the plant is known by different names including Bonga (Amharic), Luiya (kefgna), Desh (Gimirigna), Konu, Shego, Ambaressa, and Anunu (Afaan Oromo) [5].Figure 1
Tree (a) and leaves (b) ofTrichilia dregeana Sond captured from the site of collection (on 05/04/2021).
(a)(b)Traditionally, different parts ofT. dregeana are used for the treatment of wounds [6–8], gonorrhea [9, 10], syphilis [11], and warts [6] and as immunity booster [12] by different communities. Mainly the leaf of the plant is used to treat wounds even though the ways of preparations and applications are different among communities. For instance, the leaves of the plant are soaked, cooked, and put on the wound site for the treatment of fresh wound in some areas [6] while in other areas, poultices made from leaves are used to treat wounds [8].In spite of the presence of traditional claims and different supporting in vitro studies, no scientific study has been conducted on wound healing and anti-inflammatory activity of the leaves in animals. So, it is imperative to conduct a study on wound healing and anti-inflammatory activity of the leaves ofT. dregeana in animals as the leaf could be a possible source of safe, effective, and affordable wound healing and anti-inflammatory agents.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Drugs, Chemicals, and Instruments

Drugs and chemicals including wool fat (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), hard paraffin (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), white soft paraffin (Queens Hygenic Industries plc), cetostearyl alcohol (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), methanol absolute (Taflen industries, Ethiopia), n-hexane (Alpha Chemika, India), ethyl acetate (Alpha Chemika, India), distilled water (UOG, Medical Laboratory), nitrofurazone skin ointment 0.2% (Shanghai General Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., China), ketamine hydrochloride injection USP (Rotex Medica, Germany), diazepam injection (Gland Pharma Limited, India), 70% alcohol (Yilmana Chemicals, Ethiopia), normal saline 0.9% (Sansheng Pharmaceutical PLC, Ethiopia), bees wax (Bo International, India), formalin 10% (Yilmana Chemicals, Ethiopia), hematoxylin (Alpha Chemika, India), eosin (Alpha Chemika, India), Glacial acetic acid (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), potassium iodide (Caliber Engineering), ammonia solution (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), mercuric chloride (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India), iron chloride (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India), lead acetate (Guangdong Guanghua Chemicals), trihydrate, and Tween 80 (Unichem, India) were procured from legal suppliers as per the required standard and analytic grade.Sensitive digital weighing balance (Abron Exports, India), lyophilizer, rotary evaporator (Yamato, Japan), dry oven (Abron Exports, India), light, vacuum pump, desiccator, deep freezer, water bath, mortar and pestle, ointment slab, sharp sterilized scissors, surgical threads with curved needles, forceps, surgical scalpel blade, Erlenmeyer conical flask, Whatman filter paper (No 1) (Maidstone, UK), beaker, Buchner funnel, syringe with needle, glove, cotton swab adhesive plaster zinc oxide, face mask, head cover, gauze, gloves, cotton swab, permanent marker, and transparent polythene graph paper were used.


### 2.2. Plant Material

The freshTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves were collected in early March 2021 from Yebbu town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. It was identified and authenticated by Mr. Wondie Mebrat, Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Science, Debre Tabor University, and a voucher specimen was deposited with collection number DG001.


### 2.3. Experimental Animals

Healthy, either sex, adults, 20–30 grams of weight, and 6–8 weeks of age Swiss albino mice were obtained from animal house facilities of the Department of Pharmacology, University of Gondar. The mice were caged individually at room temperature and under 12 hours of light and dark cycles with a standard pellet diet and free water access [13] and allowed to adapt to the laboratory environment for five days before the study was started. Handling of the mice throughout the study was done according to International and East African Laboratory Animal Use and Care Guidelines [14, 15].


## 2.1. Drugs, Chemicals, and Instruments

Drugs and chemicals including wool fat (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), hard paraffin (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), white soft paraffin (Queens Hygenic Industries plc), cetostearyl alcohol (BDH Chemicals Ltd, England), methanol absolute (Taflen industries, Ethiopia), n-hexane (Alpha Chemika, India), ethyl acetate (Alpha Chemika, India), distilled water (UOG, Medical Laboratory), nitrofurazone skin ointment 0.2% (Shanghai General Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., China), ketamine hydrochloride injection USP (Rotex Medica, Germany), diazepam injection (Gland Pharma Limited, India), 70% alcohol (Yilmana Chemicals, Ethiopia), normal saline 0.9% (Sansheng Pharmaceutical PLC, Ethiopia), bees wax (Bo International, India), formalin 10% (Yilmana Chemicals, Ethiopia), hematoxylin (Alpha Chemika, India), eosin (Alpha Chemika, India), Glacial acetic acid (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), potassium iodide (Caliber Engineering), ammonia solution (Blulux Laboratories Pvt. Ltd, India), mercuric chloride (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India), iron chloride (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India), lead acetate (Guangdong Guanghua Chemicals), trihydrate, and Tween 80 (Unichem, India) were procured from legal suppliers as per the required standard and analytic grade.Sensitive digital weighing balance (Abron Exports, India), lyophilizer, rotary evaporator (Yamato, Japan), dry oven (Abron Exports, India), light, vacuum pump, desiccator, deep freezer, water bath, mortar and pestle, ointment slab, sharp sterilized scissors, surgical threads with curved needles, forceps, surgical scalpel blade, Erlenmeyer conical flask, Whatman filter paper (No 1) (Maidstone, UK), beaker, Buchner funnel, syringe with needle, glove, cotton swab adhesive plaster zinc oxide, face mask, head cover, gauze, gloves, cotton swab, permanent marker, and transparent polythene graph paper were used.


## 2.2. Plant Material

The freshTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves were collected in early March 2021 from Yebbu town, Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. It was identified and authenticated by Mr. Wondie Mebrat, Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Science, Debre Tabor University, and a voucher specimen was deposited with collection number DG001.


## 2.3. Experimental Animals

Healthy, either sex, adults, 20–30 grams of weight, and 6–8 weeks of age Swiss albino mice were obtained from animal house facilities of the Department of Pharmacology, University of Gondar. The mice were caged individually at room temperature and under 12 hours of light and dark cycles with a standard pellet diet and free water access [13] and allowed to adapt to the laboratory environment for five days before the study was started. Handling of the mice throughout the study was done according to International and East African Laboratory Animal Use and Care Guidelines [14, 15].


## 3. Methods

### 3.1. Plant Material Extraction and Fractionation

The debris from the collected plant materials was rinsed with tap water and subjected to shade drying. The dried plant materials were ground to a coarse powder using mortar and pestle and stored in an air-tight container until extraction was started.A total of 2.5 kg powder was macerated in 15 L of 80% methanol (1 : 6 w/v) in round bottom flask with intermittent shaking for three days. On the third day, the extract was filtered using surgical gauze and Whatman filter paper number 1 consecutively. The marc was re-macerated twice in the same manner, and the filtrates were collected and evaporated using a rotary evaporator set at 40°C, and concentrated aqueous solution remained. The remaining concentrated aqueous solution was further evaporated using a dry oven at 40°C. By using a deep freezer, the concentrated filtrate was frozen overnight at −40°C, and then the frozen filtrate was lyophilized at vacuum pressure 0.200 mBar and −40°C to remove water. The dried powder was weighted, packed in an air-tight container, and stored at 4°C temperature. The yield obtained after extraction of dried powder material was 182.25 g (7.29%).For fractionation, a total of 115 g of the crude extract was suspended in 690 ml of distilled water (1 : 6 w/v) using a separatory funnel. Then, the same amount of n-hexane was added, mixed well, and allowed to settle and form distinct layers. Once the distinct layers were formed, n-hexane fraction was separated by eluting the bottom aqueous layer from the separatory funnel. This step was repeated two more times, and the n-hexane fractions were collected in the same container. To get ethyl acetate fractions, an equal amount of ethyl acetate to that of distilled water was added to the aqueous fraction. The ethyl acetate fraction was separated after a distinct layer was formed between ethyl acetate and aqueous fraction by collecting the bottom aqueous layer. This process was also repeated two more times, and ethyl acetate fractions were collected in the same container. The fractions of all n-hexane and ethyl acetate were evaporated using a rotary evaporator while aqueous fraction was concentrated using an oven at 40°C before undergoing lyophilization at vacuum pressure 0.200 mBar and −40°C. The percent yields of the dried fractions were 33.75%, 6.63%, and 56.21% for n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions, respectively. The fractions were stored at 4°C in the refrigerator [16].


### 3.2. Ointment Formulation

Using the formula described in British Pharmacopeia (Table1), the simple ointment was prepared [17].Table 1
Formula for preparation of simple ointment.
IngredientsMaster formula (g)Reduced formula (g)Hard paraffin5015White soft paraffin850255Cetostearyl alcohol5015Wool fat5015Total1000300All ingredients were weighted properly. Based on their descending order of melting points which are hard paraffin, cetostearyl alcohol, wool fat, and white soft paraffin, all ingredients were placed and added to the evaporating dish and melted over a water bath. The mixture was stirred continuously to ensure homogeneity [18]. This simple ointment was used as a vehicle for the preparation of medicated ointments. To prepare 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 5 g and 10 g of the extract was added to 95 g and 90 g simple ointment base, respectively. Similarly, 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) of the three fraction ointments were prepared by mixing 1.5 g and 3 g each of h-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions into 28.5 g and 27 g of simple ointment base, respectively, to get 30 g medicated ointments.


### 3.3. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening

The presence of alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, phenols, steroids, glycosides, tannins, anthraquinones, and terpenoids in the crude extract as well as n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions ofT. dregeana leaves was screened based on standard procedures [19].


### 3.4. Acute Oral Toxicity Test

Acute oral toxicity test was carried out based on OECD 425: “Limit test at 2000 mg/kg” [20]. Five female Swiss albino mice with normal skin texture, 6 weeks of age, were randomly selected and used for the test. The mice fasted for 4 hours before and 1 hour after the extract was administered. A single dose of 2000 mg/kg crude extract was administered to single female mouse using oral gavage, and the mouse was kept alive for the first 24 hours, and then the similar dose was administered to 4 additional mice sequentially every 24 hours. The mice were observed every 30 minutes in the first 4 hours and daily for 14 consecutive days for changes in skin and fur, eyes and mucus membranes, somatomotor activity, behavioral pattern, salivation and diarrhea, weight loss, tremor and convulsions, lethargy and paralysis, food and water intake, and mortality.


### 3.5. Acute Dermal Toxicity Test

An acute dermal toxicity test of 80% methanol crude extract of the plant was carried out and evaluated according to OECD 402 and 404 guidelines [21, 22]. Five female mice with normal skin texture, 6 weeks of age, and 20–30 g of weight were caged individually and acclimatized to the laboratory 5 days before the test. From the dorsal/flank area, about 10% of the body surface area of the mice was shaved after being anesthetized by 80 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg diazepam. On the next day, 2000 mg/kg of 10% (w/w) ointment formulation of the extract was applied uniformly over the shaved area and covered with gauze and non-occlusive bandage. After 24 hours, the residual test substance was washed out and the mice were observed for edema, erythema, and irritation development daily for 14 days, and any skin reaction was evaluated based on the skin reaction scoring systems on OECD 404 [22, 23].


### 3.6. Grouping and Dosing of the Experimental Animals

For evaluation of wound healing and anti-inflammatory activities ofTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves, a total of 186 mice were used. To evaluate the wound healing activity of the extract, 24 mice were grouped into four groups for each excision and burn wound model while 30 mice were grouped into five for the incision wound model. Each group contains six mice. In all three models, group I was treated with simple ointment (serve as negative control), groups II and III were treated by 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointment, respectively. Group VI was treated with nitrofurazone 0.2% w/v ointment (served as positive control). Group V of incision wound model was left untreated (served as an untreated control group).Solvent fractions were evaluated on an excision wound model using eight groups (each has six mice). Group I was treated with simple ointment. Groups II and III were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction (AQF) ointment formulations, respectively. Groups IV and V were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) ointment formulations, respectively. Groups VI and VII were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) n-hexane fraction (NHF) ointment formulations, respectively. Group VIII was treated with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment.To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of the extract, five groups (each containing six mice) were used for each of xylene-induced ear edema model and cotton pellet-induced granuloma model. Group I was treated with 2% Tween 80 at a dose of 10 ml/kg (served as negative control). Groups II, III, and IV were treated with 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg extract, respectively. Group V was treated with indomethacin 10 mg/kg (served as positive control). At the end of the experiment, each mouse was euthanized by using high doses of ketamine (four times normal dose) and diazepam. Finally, the remnants were buried in a proper area to avoid environmental contamination.


### 3.7. Wound Healing Activity Tests

#### 3.7.1. Excision Wound Model

On day 0, twenty-four mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal 80 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg diazepam. After the fur from the dorsal thoracic area was shaved, full-thickness excision wound about 314 mm2 circular area and 2 mm depth was created using forceps and scissors (Figure 2). Hemostasis was achieved with a cotton swab soaked in normal saline [24, 25]. On the next day, day 1, the mice were treated with ointments once daily until the positive control group was healed completely. The mice were observed for wound closure by measuring the wound area every two days using a transparent sheet and permanent marker to mark the area which was finally measured by using one millimeter square graph paper. A similar procedure was followed for the excision wound model of solvent fractions [24–26].Figure 2
A marked area for incision wound (a). Created excision wound (b).
(a)(b)


### 3.8. Wound Healing Parameters

#### 3.8.1. Wound Contraction

Wound closure was measured by calculating the percentage of wound contraction using the initial 314 mm2 sizes of the wound as 100%. The percentage of wound contraction was calculated using the following formula:(1)%woundcontraction=initialwoundsize−specificdaywoundsizeinitialwoundsize∗100.


#### 3.8.2. Period of Epithelialization

The period of epithelialization was measured as the number of days required for the detachment of the eschar without leaving any raw wound [26].


#### 3.8.3. Histopathological Analysis

A histopathological test was done on the healed wound. Mice from each group were euthanized by an overdose of ketamine and diazepam intraperitoneally [27]. Then, cross-sectional full-thickness skin specimens were excised, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, processed, blocked with paraffin, and sectioned into 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Wound healing process alteration was analyzed, and the result was compared to those of controls [28].


#### 3.8.4. Incision Wound Model

On day 0, 30 mice were anesthetized and the back fur was shaved. Then, a 3 cm long and 2 mm depth linear paravertebral incision was created. The created wound was stitched at 1 cm interval using black braided silk (no. 00) and left undressed. From day 1, the ointments were applied once daily for 9 days. On post-wounding day 8, the suture was removed and the extent of healing was assessed by measuring the tensile strength using continuous water flow method on post-wounding day 10. Two forceps were inflexibly applied at 3 mm away from the edge of the wound facing each other on the opposite sides of the incision wound to the anesthetized mice on the operating table. One of the forceps was secure on stands while the other was connected to a freely suspended lightweight plastic of volume 500 ml into which the water flowed continuously and gently. The water flow was stopped at the moment the wound was opened up and the volume of the collected water in the reservoir was recorded as tensile strength (Figure3). The breaking strength was compared among the groups [29]. The percentage of tensile strength was calculated as follows:(2)%tensilestrengthoftheextract=tensilestrengthofextract−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofthereference=tensilestrengthofthereference−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofsimpleointment=tensilestrengthofthesimpleointment−tensilestrengthofleftuntreatedtensilestrengthofleftuntreated∗100.Figure 3
Paravertebral sutured incision wound (a). Measurement of the tensile strength (b).
(a)(b)(1) Burn Wound Model. Twenty-four mice were anesthetized, fur from the back was shaved, and they were decontaminated similarly to that of excision and incision models. A circular cylinder of 300 mm2 opening into which the molten wax at 80°C was poured in was placed on the shaven part of the mice for 10–12 minutes until the poured hot molten wax gets solidified, and then the wax was removed. This created a partial-thickness circular burn on the area. Then, the mice were placed back in their cage individually. Treatments were applied over the wounded area daily until the wound is epithelialized. The healing progress was assessed every 2 days, and the percentage of wound contraction was calculated, period of epithelialization was recorded, and histopathological analysis was performed [30, 31].


#### 3.8.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity Tests

(1) Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model. The methods previously used by Manouze et al. [32] were followed with some modifications to study the effects of the crude extract on acute inflammation. Male mice were assigned randomly into five groups and fasted overnight with free access to water. Then, the test substance was given to the mice by using oral gavage. After one hour of test substance administration, inflammation was induced by topical application of 0.03 ml of 100% xylene on the inner and outer surface of the right ear, and the left ear served as control. After two hours, the mice from each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Then, a circular section of 9 mm in diameter was excised and weighted. The extent of ear edema was evaluated by calculating the weight difference between the right and left ear sections of the same mouse [33].(3)Earswelling=weightofrightear−weightofleftear,percentinhibition=earswellingcontrol−earswellingtestearswellingcontrol∗100.(2) Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma. A chronic anti-inflammatory effect of 80% methanol extract of the plant was carried out according to previously used methods by Gou et al. [33] with some modifications. Male mice (25–30 g) were fasted overnight on day 1 and then fasted for six hours from day 2 to 7 with free access to water. The controls and test groups were treated as mentioned under the grouping and dosing section. Cotton pellets (10 ± 0.1 mg) were sterilized in an autoclave at 120°C under 15 lb pressure for 30 minutes. The mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride and 5 mg/kg diazepam twenty minutes after treatment with controls and the crude extract. The cotton pellets were implanted subcutaneously in both sides of the previously shaved groin region through a single surgical blade incision and stitched with chromic catgut (2/0 metric-1/2 circle). The mice were given their respective treatment daily for seven consecutive days. On day 8, the mice were sacrificed with a high dose of ketamine (four times normal dose), and the cotton pellets with granuloma tissue were dissected and the extraneous tissues were carefully removed [33]. The dissected cotton pellets were dried to constant weight at 60°C for 24 hours, and then each of the dried cotton weights was recorded.Percentage protection from granuloma development was calculated using the following formula:(4)weightofexudates=wetweightofthecottonpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,weightofgranulomatissue=constantdryweightofpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,percentageofwetweightinhibition=meanwetweightincontrol−meanwetweightintreatedgroupmeanwetweightincontrol∗100,percentageofgranulomainhibition=meangranulomaincontrol−meangranulomaintreatedgroupmeangranulomaincontrol∗100.


### 3.9. Statistical Analysis

The results of the experiment were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean, and SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the results. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the test of statistical significance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 3.1. Plant Material Extraction and Fractionation

The debris from the collected plant materials was rinsed with tap water and subjected to shade drying. The dried plant materials were ground to a coarse powder using mortar and pestle and stored in an air-tight container until extraction was started.A total of 2.5 kg powder was macerated in 15 L of 80% methanol (1 : 6 w/v) in round bottom flask with intermittent shaking for three days. On the third day, the extract was filtered using surgical gauze and Whatman filter paper number 1 consecutively. The marc was re-macerated twice in the same manner, and the filtrates were collected and evaporated using a rotary evaporator set at 40°C, and concentrated aqueous solution remained. The remaining concentrated aqueous solution was further evaporated using a dry oven at 40°C. By using a deep freezer, the concentrated filtrate was frozen overnight at −40°C, and then the frozen filtrate was lyophilized at vacuum pressure 0.200 mBar and −40°C to remove water. The dried powder was weighted, packed in an air-tight container, and stored at 4°C temperature. The yield obtained after extraction of dried powder material was 182.25 g (7.29%).For fractionation, a total of 115 g of the crude extract was suspended in 690 ml of distilled water (1 : 6 w/v) using a separatory funnel. Then, the same amount of n-hexane was added, mixed well, and allowed to settle and form distinct layers. Once the distinct layers were formed, n-hexane fraction was separated by eluting the bottom aqueous layer from the separatory funnel. This step was repeated two more times, and the n-hexane fractions were collected in the same container. To get ethyl acetate fractions, an equal amount of ethyl acetate to that of distilled water was added to the aqueous fraction. The ethyl acetate fraction was separated after a distinct layer was formed between ethyl acetate and aqueous fraction by collecting the bottom aqueous layer. This process was also repeated two more times, and ethyl acetate fractions were collected in the same container. The fractions of all n-hexane and ethyl acetate were evaporated using a rotary evaporator while aqueous fraction was concentrated using an oven at 40°C before undergoing lyophilization at vacuum pressure 0.200 mBar and −40°C. The percent yields of the dried fractions were 33.75%, 6.63%, and 56.21% for n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions, respectively. The fractions were stored at 4°C in the refrigerator [16].


## 3.2. Ointment Formulation

Using the formula described in British Pharmacopeia (Table1), the simple ointment was prepared [17].Table 1
Formula for preparation of simple ointment.
IngredientsMaster formula (g)Reduced formula (g)Hard paraffin5015White soft paraffin850255Cetostearyl alcohol5015Wool fat5015Total1000300All ingredients were weighted properly. Based on their descending order of melting points which are hard paraffin, cetostearyl alcohol, wool fat, and white soft paraffin, all ingredients were placed and added to the evaporating dish and melted over a water bath. The mixture was stirred continuously to ensure homogeneity [18]. This simple ointment was used as a vehicle for the preparation of medicated ointments. To prepare 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 5 g and 10 g of the extract was added to 95 g and 90 g simple ointment base, respectively. Similarly, 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) of the three fraction ointments were prepared by mixing 1.5 g and 3 g each of h-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions into 28.5 g and 27 g of simple ointment base, respectively, to get 30 g medicated ointments.


## 3.3. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening

The presence of alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, phenols, steroids, glycosides, tannins, anthraquinones, and terpenoids in the crude extract as well as n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and aqueous fractions ofT. dregeana leaves was screened based on standard procedures [19].


## 3.4. Acute Oral Toxicity Test

Acute oral toxicity test was carried out based on OECD 425: “Limit test at 2000 mg/kg” [20]. Five female Swiss albino mice with normal skin texture, 6 weeks of age, were randomly selected and used for the test. The mice fasted for 4 hours before and 1 hour after the extract was administered. A single dose of 2000 mg/kg crude extract was administered to single female mouse using oral gavage, and the mouse was kept alive for the first 24 hours, and then the similar dose was administered to 4 additional mice sequentially every 24 hours. The mice were observed every 30 minutes in the first 4 hours and daily for 14 consecutive days for changes in skin and fur, eyes and mucus membranes, somatomotor activity, behavioral pattern, salivation and diarrhea, weight loss, tremor and convulsions, lethargy and paralysis, food and water intake, and mortality.


## 3.5. Acute Dermal Toxicity Test

An acute dermal toxicity test of 80% methanol crude extract of the plant was carried out and evaluated according to OECD 402 and 404 guidelines [21, 22]. Five female mice with normal skin texture, 6 weeks of age, and 20–30 g of weight were caged individually and acclimatized to the laboratory 5 days before the test. From the dorsal/flank area, about 10% of the body surface area of the mice was shaved after being anesthetized by 80 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg diazepam. On the next day, 2000 mg/kg of 10% (w/w) ointment formulation of the extract was applied uniformly over the shaved area and covered with gauze and non-occlusive bandage. After 24 hours, the residual test substance was washed out and the mice were observed for edema, erythema, and irritation development daily for 14 days, and any skin reaction was evaluated based on the skin reaction scoring systems on OECD 404 [22, 23].


## 3.6. Grouping and Dosing of the Experimental Animals

For evaluation of wound healing and anti-inflammatory activities ofTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves, a total of 186 mice were used. To evaluate the wound healing activity of the extract, 24 mice were grouped into four groups for each excision and burn wound model while 30 mice were grouped into five for the incision wound model. Each group contains six mice. In all three models, group I was treated with simple ointment (serve as negative control), groups II and III were treated by 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointment, respectively. Group VI was treated with nitrofurazone 0.2% w/v ointment (served as positive control). Group V of incision wound model was left untreated (served as an untreated control group).Solvent fractions were evaluated on an excision wound model using eight groups (each has six mice). Group I was treated with simple ointment. Groups II and III were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction (AQF) ointment formulations, respectively. Groups IV and V were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction (EAF) ointment formulations, respectively. Groups VI and VII were treated with 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) n-hexane fraction (NHF) ointment formulations, respectively. Group VIII was treated with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment.To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of the extract, five groups (each containing six mice) were used for each of xylene-induced ear edema model and cotton pellet-induced granuloma model. Group I was treated with 2% Tween 80 at a dose of 10 ml/kg (served as negative control). Groups II, III, and IV were treated with 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg extract, respectively. Group V was treated with indomethacin 10 mg/kg (served as positive control). At the end of the experiment, each mouse was euthanized by using high doses of ketamine (four times normal dose) and diazepam. Finally, the remnants were buried in a proper area to avoid environmental contamination.


## 3.7. Wound Healing Activity Tests

### 3.7.1. Excision Wound Model

On day 0, twenty-four mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal 80 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg diazepam. After the fur from the dorsal thoracic area was shaved, full-thickness excision wound about 314 mm2 circular area and 2 mm depth was created using forceps and scissors (Figure 2). Hemostasis was achieved with a cotton swab soaked in normal saline [24, 25]. On the next day, day 1, the mice were treated with ointments once daily until the positive control group was healed completely. The mice were observed for wound closure by measuring the wound area every two days using a transparent sheet and permanent marker to mark the area which was finally measured by using one millimeter square graph paper. A similar procedure was followed for the excision wound model of solvent fractions [24–26].Figure 2
A marked area for incision wound (a). Created excision wound (b).
(a)(b)


## 3.7.1. Excision Wound Model

On day 0, twenty-four mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal 80 mg/kg ketamine and 5 mg/kg diazepam. After the fur from the dorsal thoracic area was shaved, full-thickness excision wound about 314 mm2 circular area and 2 mm depth was created using forceps and scissors (Figure 2). Hemostasis was achieved with a cotton swab soaked in normal saline [24, 25]. On the next day, day 1, the mice were treated with ointments once daily until the positive control group was healed completely. The mice were observed for wound closure by measuring the wound area every two days using a transparent sheet and permanent marker to mark the area which was finally measured by using one millimeter square graph paper. A similar procedure was followed for the excision wound model of solvent fractions [24–26].Figure 2
A marked area for incision wound (a). Created excision wound (b).
(a)(b)


## 3.8. Wound Healing Parameters

### 3.8.1. Wound Contraction

Wound closure was measured by calculating the percentage of wound contraction using the initial 314 mm2 sizes of the wound as 100%. The percentage of wound contraction was calculated using the following formula:(1)%woundcontraction=initialwoundsize−specificdaywoundsizeinitialwoundsize∗100.


### 3.8.2. Period of Epithelialization

The period of epithelialization was measured as the number of days required for the detachment of the eschar without leaving any raw wound [26].


### 3.8.3. Histopathological Analysis

A histopathological test was done on the healed wound. Mice from each group were euthanized by an overdose of ketamine and diazepam intraperitoneally [27]. Then, cross-sectional full-thickness skin specimens were excised, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, processed, blocked with paraffin, and sectioned into 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Wound healing process alteration was analyzed, and the result was compared to those of controls [28].


### 3.8.4. Incision Wound Model

On day 0, 30 mice were anesthetized and the back fur was shaved. Then, a 3 cm long and 2 mm depth linear paravertebral incision was created. The created wound was stitched at 1 cm interval using black braided silk (no. 00) and left undressed. From day 1, the ointments were applied once daily for 9 days. On post-wounding day 8, the suture was removed and the extent of healing was assessed by measuring the tensile strength using continuous water flow method on post-wounding day 10. Two forceps were inflexibly applied at 3 mm away from the edge of the wound facing each other on the opposite sides of the incision wound to the anesthetized mice on the operating table. One of the forceps was secure on stands while the other was connected to a freely suspended lightweight plastic of volume 500 ml into which the water flowed continuously and gently. The water flow was stopped at the moment the wound was opened up and the volume of the collected water in the reservoir was recorded as tensile strength (Figure3). The breaking strength was compared among the groups [29]. The percentage of tensile strength was calculated as follows:(2)%tensilestrengthoftheextract=tensilestrengthofextract−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofthereference=tensilestrengthofthereference−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofsimpleointment=tensilestrengthofthesimpleointment−tensilestrengthofleftuntreatedtensilestrengthofleftuntreated∗100.Figure 3
Paravertebral sutured incision wound (a). Measurement of the tensile strength (b).
(a)(b)(1) Burn Wound Model. Twenty-four mice were anesthetized, fur from the back was shaved, and they were decontaminated similarly to that of excision and incision models. A circular cylinder of 300 mm2 opening into which the molten wax at 80°C was poured in was placed on the shaven part of the mice for 10–12 minutes until the poured hot molten wax gets solidified, and then the wax was removed. This created a partial-thickness circular burn on the area. Then, the mice were placed back in their cage individually. Treatments were applied over the wounded area daily until the wound is epithelialized. The healing progress was assessed every 2 days, and the percentage of wound contraction was calculated, period of epithelialization was recorded, and histopathological analysis was performed [30, 31].


### 3.8.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity Tests

(1) Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model. The methods previously used by Manouze et al. [32] were followed with some modifications to study the effects of the crude extract on acute inflammation. Male mice were assigned randomly into five groups and fasted overnight with free access to water. Then, the test substance was given to the mice by using oral gavage. After one hour of test substance administration, inflammation was induced by topical application of 0.03 ml of 100% xylene on the inner and outer surface of the right ear, and the left ear served as control. After two hours, the mice from each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Then, a circular section of 9 mm in diameter was excised and weighted. The extent of ear edema was evaluated by calculating the weight difference between the right and left ear sections of the same mouse [33].(3)Earswelling=weightofrightear−weightofleftear,percentinhibition=earswellingcontrol−earswellingtestearswellingcontrol∗100.(2) Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma. A chronic anti-inflammatory effect of 80% methanol extract of the plant was carried out according to previously used methods by Gou et al. [33] with some modifications. Male mice (25–30 g) were fasted overnight on day 1 and then fasted for six hours from day 2 to 7 with free access to water. The controls and test groups were treated as mentioned under the grouping and dosing section. Cotton pellets (10 ± 0.1 mg) were sterilized in an autoclave at 120°C under 15 lb pressure for 30 minutes. The mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride and 5 mg/kg diazepam twenty minutes after treatment with controls and the crude extract. The cotton pellets were implanted subcutaneously in both sides of the previously shaved groin region through a single surgical blade incision and stitched with chromic catgut (2/0 metric-1/2 circle). The mice were given their respective treatment daily for seven consecutive days. On day 8, the mice were sacrificed with a high dose of ketamine (four times normal dose), and the cotton pellets with granuloma tissue were dissected and the extraneous tissues were carefully removed [33]. The dissected cotton pellets were dried to constant weight at 60°C for 24 hours, and then each of the dried cotton weights was recorded.Percentage protection from granuloma development was calculated using the following formula:(4)weightofexudates=wetweightofthecottonpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,weightofgranulomatissue=constantdryweightofpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,percentageofwetweightinhibition=meanwetweightincontrol−meanwetweightintreatedgroupmeanwetweightincontrol∗100,percentageofgranulomainhibition=meangranulomaincontrol−meangranulomaintreatedgroupmeangranulomaincontrol∗100.


## 3.8.1. Wound Contraction

Wound closure was measured by calculating the percentage of wound contraction using the initial 314 mm2 sizes of the wound as 100%. The percentage of wound contraction was calculated using the following formula:(1)%woundcontraction=initialwoundsize−specificdaywoundsizeinitialwoundsize∗100.


## 3.8.2. Period of Epithelialization

The period of epithelialization was measured as the number of days required for the detachment of the eschar without leaving any raw wound [26].


## 3.8.3. Histopathological Analysis

A histopathological test was done on the healed wound. Mice from each group were euthanized by an overdose of ketamine and diazepam intraperitoneally [27]. Then, cross-sectional full-thickness skin specimens were excised, fixed in 10% buffered formalin, processed, blocked with paraffin, and sectioned into 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Wound healing process alteration was analyzed, and the result was compared to those of controls [28].


## 3.8.4. Incision Wound Model

On day 0, 30 mice were anesthetized and the back fur was shaved. Then, a 3 cm long and 2 mm depth linear paravertebral incision was created. The created wound was stitched at 1 cm interval using black braided silk (no. 00) and left undressed. From day 1, the ointments were applied once daily for 9 days. On post-wounding day 8, the suture was removed and the extent of healing was assessed by measuring the tensile strength using continuous water flow method on post-wounding day 10. Two forceps were inflexibly applied at 3 mm away from the edge of the wound facing each other on the opposite sides of the incision wound to the anesthetized mice on the operating table. One of the forceps was secure on stands while the other was connected to a freely suspended lightweight plastic of volume 500 ml into which the water flowed continuously and gently. The water flow was stopped at the moment the wound was opened up and the volume of the collected water in the reservoir was recorded as tensile strength (Figure3). The breaking strength was compared among the groups [29]. The percentage of tensile strength was calculated as follows:(2)%tensilestrengthoftheextract=tensilestrengthofextract−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofthereference=tensilestrengthofthereference−tensilestrengthofsimpleointmenttensilestrengthofsimpleointment∗100,%tensilestrengthofsimpleointment=tensilestrengthofthesimpleointment−tensilestrengthofleftuntreatedtensilestrengthofleftuntreated∗100.Figure 3
Paravertebral sutured incision wound (a). Measurement of the tensile strength (b).
(a)(b)(1) Burn Wound Model. Twenty-four mice were anesthetized, fur from the back was shaved, and they were decontaminated similarly to that of excision and incision models. A circular cylinder of 300 mm2 opening into which the molten wax at 80°C was poured in was placed on the shaven part of the mice for 10–12 minutes until the poured hot molten wax gets solidified, and then the wax was removed. This created a partial-thickness circular burn on the area. Then, the mice were placed back in their cage individually. Treatments were applied over the wounded area daily until the wound is epithelialized. The healing progress was assessed every 2 days, and the percentage of wound contraction was calculated, period of epithelialization was recorded, and histopathological analysis was performed [30, 31].


## 3.8.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity Tests

(1) Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model. The methods previously used by Manouze et al. [32] were followed with some modifications to study the effects of the crude extract on acute inflammation. Male mice were assigned randomly into five groups and fasted overnight with free access to water. Then, the test substance was given to the mice by using oral gavage. After one hour of test substance administration, inflammation was induced by topical application of 0.03 ml of 100% xylene on the inner and outer surface of the right ear, and the left ear served as control. After two hours, the mice from each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Then, a circular section of 9 mm in diameter was excised and weighted. The extent of ear edema was evaluated by calculating the weight difference between the right and left ear sections of the same mouse [33].(3)Earswelling=weightofrightear−weightofleftear,percentinhibition=earswellingcontrol−earswellingtestearswellingcontrol∗100.(2) Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma. A chronic anti-inflammatory effect of 80% methanol extract of the plant was carried out according to previously used methods by Gou et al. [33] with some modifications. Male mice (25–30 g) were fasted overnight on day 1 and then fasted for six hours from day 2 to 7 with free access to water. The controls and test groups were treated as mentioned under the grouping and dosing section. Cotton pellets (10 ± 0.1 mg) were sterilized in an autoclave at 120°C under 15 lb pressure for 30 minutes. The mice were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 50 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride and 5 mg/kg diazepam twenty minutes after treatment with controls and the crude extract. The cotton pellets were implanted subcutaneously in both sides of the previously shaved groin region through a single surgical blade incision and stitched with chromic catgut (2/0 metric-1/2 circle). The mice were given their respective treatment daily for seven consecutive days. On day 8, the mice were sacrificed with a high dose of ketamine (four times normal dose), and the cotton pellets with granuloma tissue were dissected and the extraneous tissues were carefully removed [33]. The dissected cotton pellets were dried to constant weight at 60°C for 24 hours, and then each of the dried cotton weights was recorded.Percentage protection from granuloma development was calculated using the following formula:(4)weightofexudates=wetweightofthecottonpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,weightofgranulomatissue=constantdryweightofpellet−initialweightofcottonpellet,percentageofwetweightinhibition=meanwetweightincontrol−meanwetweightintreatedgroupmeanwetweightincontrol∗100,percentageofgranulomainhibition=meangranulomaincontrol−meangranulomaintreatedgroupmeangranulomaincontrol∗100.


## 3.9. Statistical Analysis

The results of the experiment were expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean, and SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the results. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for the test of statistical significance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


## 4. Results

### 4.1. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening

Phytochemical screening of 80% methanol crude extract and solvent fractions showed the presence of different secondary metabolites (Table2).Table 2
Results of phytochemical screening of crude extract and solvent fractions.
S. nSecondary metaboliteTest usedCrude extractAqueous fractionEthyl acetate fractionn-Hexane fraction1AlkaloidsWagner’s test++−+2SaponinsFoam+++−3FlavonoidsShinoda’s test++++4PhenolsLead acetate test++−+5TanninsFerric chloride test++++6GlycosidesKeller–Kiliani test+++−7SteroidsSalkowski’s test++−−8AnthraquinonesSalkowski’s test++++9TerpenoidsBorntrager’s test+++++: present; −: absent


### 4.2. Acute Oral and Dermal Toxicity Test

No sign of toxicity was observed after oral administration of 2000 mg/kg of the extract as well as dermal application of 2000 mg/kg of the 10% (w/w) extract ointment within the first 24 and 48 hours, and no death was registered after 14 days of follow-up. The result suggests that oral LD50 of the plant extract is greater than 2000 mg/kg in mice.


### 4.3. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity

#### 4.3.1. Excision Wound Model

(1) Healing Activity of the Crude Extract. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.01) on day 2 and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on all post-wounding days, on day 2 (p < 0.05), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with both 10% (w/w) extract and 0.2% nitrofurazone ointments showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.001) and day 6 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment also showed better wound contraction on most post-wounding days as compared to 0.2% nitrofurazone ointment though the differences were insignificant (Table 3).Table 3
Effects of the crude extract in excision wound in mice.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% wound contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointmentDay 2288.08 ± 5.09 (8.25)268.67 ± 3.75a∗ (14.44)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)Day 4271.00 ± 4.45 (13.69)231.25 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (26.35)197.00 ± 4.20 (ab)∗∗∗ (37.26)199.00 ± 3.91 (ab)∗∗∗ (36.62)Day 6254.25 ± 5.11 (19.03)168.33 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (46.39)145.00 ± 3.31a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)145.00 ± 3.73a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)Day 8209.58 ± 6.25 (33.25)114.83 ± 4.62a∗∗∗ (63.43)100.92 ± 3.70a∗∗∗ (67.86)102.25 ± 4.28a∗∗∗ (67.44)Day 10150.42 ± 5.32 (52.10)69.92 ± 3.96a∗∗∗ (77.73)60.50 ± 3.37a∗∗∗ (80.73)58.00 ± 3.32a∗∗∗ (81.53)Day 12113.25 ± 3.52 (63.93)33.42 ± 1.88a∗∗∗ (89.36)28.33 ± 1.70a∗∗∗ (90.98)31.67 ± 1.69a∗∗∗ (89.91)Day 1467.50 ± 4.56 (78.50)8.17 ± 1.42a∗∗∗ (97.40)5.50 ± 0.72a∗∗∗ (98.25)7.33 ± 1.17a∗∗∗ (97.67)Day 1627.25 ± 7.43 (91.32)1.33 ± 0.84a∗∗∗ (99.56)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.00 ± 0.63a∗∗∗ (99.68)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Initial wound area was 314 mm2.Complete percentage of wound contraction for groups treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 16, 18, 18, and beyond, respectively (Figures4 and 5).Figure 4
Effects of the crude extract on contraction of excision wound.Figure 5
Excision wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


### 4.4. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with both 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) extract ointment as well as 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment showed significantly (p < 0.001) short period of epithelialization as compared to simple ointment. Mean period of epithelialization in mice treated with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, and 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment has been reduced by 24.99%, 26.54%, and 25.79%, respectively, as compared to simple ointment (Table 4).Table 4
Effects of crude extract on the period of epithelialization in excision wound.
Treatment groupPeriod of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment21.33 ± 0.84—5% (w/w) extract ointment16.00 ± 0.37a∗∗∗24.9910% (w/w) extract ointment15.67 ± 0.21a∗∗∗26.540.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment15.83 ± 0.40a∗∗∗25.79Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment. ∗∗∗p<0.001


### 4.5. Healing Activity of Solvent Fractions

Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction on all post-wounding days as compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. Similarly, 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment (p < 0.01) as compared to all 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments on post-wounding day 2. From post-wounding day 4 onwards, 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointments showed highly significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction when compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments.Treatment with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed significant contraction from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.05) and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.01) as compared to simple ointment, while 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction from day 6 to 8 (p < 0.05), from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.01), and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 5% (w/w) hexane fraction ointment showed significant contraction on day 10 (p < 0.05) and from day 12 onwards (p < 0.01) as compared to simple ointment, while 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction from day 4 to 8 (p < 0.05), from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.01), and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Nitrofurazone also showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.001) on all post-wounding days as compared to simple ointment (Table 5).Table 5
Effects of solvent fractions of in excised wounds.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) AQF ointment10% (w/w) AQF ointment5% (w/w) EAF ointment10% (w/w) EAF ointment5% (w/w) NHF ointment10% (w/w) NHF ointment0.2% (w/v) NF ointmentDay 2293.25 ± 1.37 (6.61)272.42 ± 1.48 (13.24) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗272.50 ± 1.47 (13.22) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗290.08 ± 2.20 (7.62)288.08 ± 2.11 (8.25)282.75 ± 1.22 (9.95)a∗∗279.33 ± 1.64 (11.04)a∗∗∗273.17 ± 1.68 (13.00)a∗∗∗∗∗Day 4268.17 ± 1.70 (14.60)239.67 ± 1.98 (23.67) (abc)∗∗∗f∗g∗237.83 ± 2.14 (24.26) (abc)∗∗∗(fg)∗∗258.67 ± 1.36 (17.62)a∗∗251.58 ± 1.08 (19.88)a∗∗∗248.00 ± 1.04 (21.02)a∗∗∗247.50 ± 1.44 (21.18)a∗∗∗244.42 ± 1.43 (22.16)a∗∗∗Day 6235.67 ± 2.25 (24.95)196.33 ± 1.44 (37.47) (abc)∗∗∗193.42 ± 1.68 (38.40) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗217.33 ± 1.45 (30.79)a∗∗∗219.33 ± 1.93 (30.15)a∗∗∗202.50 ± 1.22 (35.51)a∗∗∗197.50 ± 1.43 (37.10)a∗∗∗191.33 ± 1.89 (39.07)a∗∗∗Day 8194.50 ± 1.93 (38.06)142.67 ± 1.35 (54.56) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗139.17 ± 1.51 (55.68) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗169.42 ± 1.35 (46.04)a∗∗∗167.17 ± 1.67 (46.76)a∗∗∗153.17 ± 1.20 (51.22)a∗∗∗149.17 ± 2.12 (52.49)a∗∗∗144.58 ± 1.45 (53.96)a∗∗∗Day 10145.25 ± 2.63 (53.74)107.33 ± 2.38 (65.82) (abc)∗∗∗100.08 ± 1.37 (68.13) (abc)∗∗∗f∗128.25 ± 2.12 (59.16)a∗∗∗126.08 ± 2.20 (59.85)a∗∗∗111.75 ± 2.44 (64.41)a∗∗∗107.50 ± 2.54 (65.76)a∗∗∗102.25 ± 1.36 (67.44)a∗∗∗Day 12107.67 ± 1.92 (65.71)67.75 ± 2.05 (78.42) (abc)∗∗∗66.17 ± 1.46 (78.93) (abc)∗∗∗95.17 ± 1.17 (69.69)a∗∗∗92.08 ± 1.15 (70.68)a∗∗∗71.17 ± 1.85 (77.33)a∗∗∗70.42 ± 1.93 (77.57)a∗∗∗67.92 ± 1.95 (78.37)a∗∗∗Day 1473.17 ± 2.33 (76.70)28.33 ± 1.48 (90.98) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗26.58 ± 1.36 (91.54) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗56.33 ± 1.56 (82.06)a∗∗∗51.75 ± 1.42 (83.52)a∗∗∗37.58 ± 1.58 (88.03)a∗∗∗33.75 ± 1.22 (89.25)a∗∗∗30.92 ± 1.46 (90.15)a∗∗∗Day 1637.67 ± 2.34 (88.00)2.83 ± 1.35 (99.10) (abc)∗∗∗0.00 ± 0.00 (100.00) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗22.33 ± 1.29 (92.89)a∗∗∗17.75 ± 1.28 (94.35)a∗∗∗8.83 ± 0.74 (97.19)a∗∗∗7.08 ± 1.76 (97.75)a∗∗∗3.50 ± 1.69 (98.89)a∗∗∗Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6) and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test were used for analysis; acompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% w/w EAF, ccompared to 10% w/w EAF; dcompared to 5% w/w NHF; fcompared to 10% w/w NHF; gcompared to 0.2% w/V nitrofurazone oint. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The initial wound area was 314 mm2, where AQF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction: NHF: n-hexane fraction. NF: NitrofurazoneMice treated with 10% (w/w) aqueous fractions ointment showed complete wound closure by day 16 while it took beyond day 16 for complete wound closure by other fraction ointments (Figures6 and 7).Figure 6
Effects of solvent fractions on the percent of contraction in excision wound in mice. ADF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; NHF: n-hexane fraction.Figure 7
Excision wound healing progression after treated with solvent fractions.


### 4.6. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significantly short period of epithelialization (p < 0.001) as compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, and 5% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. It also showed significantly short period of epithelialization (p < 0.01) as compared to both 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment reduced period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.001) when compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments.Groups treated with both 5% and 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointments reduced the period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, treatments with both 5% and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments also reduced the period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed the highest percentage of reduction in the period of epithelialization, 20.85%; on the contrary, treatment with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed the lowest percentage, 6.65%, as compared to simple ointment (Table6).Table 6
Effects of solvent fractions on the period of epithelialization in excision wound.
Treatment groupMean period of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment20.00 ± 0.37—5% (w/w) AQF ointment16.67 ± 0.33 (abd)∗∗∗ (ce)∗∗16.6510% (w/w) AQF ointment15.83 ± 0.17 (abcde)∗∗∗20.855% (w/w) EAF ointment18.67 ± 0.21 (a)∗6.6510% (w/w) EAF ointment18.33 ± 0.21 (a)∗∗8.355% (w/w) NHF ointment18.50 ± 0.22 (a)∗∗7.5010% (w/w) NHF ointment18.17 ± 0.17 (a)∗∗∗9.150.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment16.50 ± 0.22 (abcd)∗∗∗ (e)∗∗17.50Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to the negative control; bcompared to 5% (w/w) EAF ointment; ccompared to 10% (w/w) EAF ointment; dcompared to 5% (w/w) NHF ointment; ecompared to 10% (w/w) NHF ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. AQF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; NHF: n-hexane fraction.


### 4.7. Healing Activity of the Extract in Incision Wound

Groups treated with 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant (p < 0.001) increases in breaking resistance as compared to both simple ointments and left untreated groups. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed the highest percentage of tensile strength, 74.00%, while the simple ointment group showed the least percentage of tensile strength, 12.56%, as compared to left untreated group (Table 7).Table 7
Effects of the crude extract on incision wound.
Treatment groupMean tensile strength ± SEMPercent of tensile strengthUntreated169.78 ± 3.41—Simple ointment191.11 ± 3.1812.565% (w/w) extract ointment282.28 ± 3.17 (ab)∗∗∗47.7110% (w/w) extract ointment332.52 ± 4.87 (ab)∗∗∗74.000.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment330.48 ± 2.80 (ab)∗∗∗72.93Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to the untreated group; bcompared to the simple ointment-treated group. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


#### 4.7.1. Healing Activity of the Extract in Burn Wound

(1) Wound Contraction. Mice treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 2 (p < 0.05), on day 4 (p < 0.01), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, mice treated with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.05) and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 6 (p < 0.05) and day 8 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Similarly, treatment with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment showed significant contraction on day 8 (p < 0.05) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment (Table 8).Table 8
Effects of the crude extract on burn wound.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) NF ointmentDay 2295.33 ± 0.88 (1.56)292.17 ± 1.78 (2.61)288.42 ± 1.79a∗ (3.86)289.17 ± 1.41a∗ (3.61)Day 4276.25 ± 2.00 (7.92)266.67 ± 2.18a∗ (11.11)262.08 ± 2.41a∗∗ (12.64)264.08 ± 2.55a∗∗ (11.97)Day 6246.25 ± 1.54 (17.92)219.75 ± 1.99a∗∗∗ (26.75)210.17 ± 1.87a∗∗∗b∗ (29.94)217.25 ± 2.24a∗∗∗ (27.58)Day 8210.75 ± 1.35 (29.75)174.83 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (41.72)161.75 ± 2.29a∗∗∗b∗∗ (46.08)166.42 ± 2.15a∗∗∗b∗ (44.52)Day 10179.33 ± 2.02 (40.22)131.00 ± 2.00a∗∗∗ (56.33)123.17 ± 1.74a∗∗∗ (58.94)124.58 ± 2.34a∗∗∗ (58.47)Day 12146.50 ± 1.47 (51.17)94.00 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (68.67)86.00 ± 1.53a∗∗∗ (71.33)89.50 ± 2.09a∗∗∗ (70.17)Day 14120.83 ± 1.96 (59.72)56.08 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (81.31)49.75 ± 1.31a∗∗∗ (83.42)50.42 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (83.19)Day 1691.67 ± 2.82 (69.44)26.00 ± 1.79a∗∗∗ (91.33)21.92 ± 0.92a∗∗∗ (92.69)25.67 ± 1.61a∗∗∗ (91.44)Day 1868.83 ± 2.11 (77.06)10.67 ± 0.85a∗∗∗ (96.44)5.58 ±0 .61a∗∗∗ (98.14)8.92 ± 1.04a∗∗∗∗(97.03)Day 2038.50 ± 1.90 (87.17)3.08 ± 1.04a∗∗∗ (98.97)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.17 ± 0.54a∗∗∗ (99.61)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The initial wound area was 300 mm2.Complete wound closure after treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 22, 20, 22, and beyond, respectively (Figures8 and 9).Figure 8
Effects of crude extract on contraction of burn wound.Figure 9
Burn wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


### 4.8. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed significantly (p < 0.001) short period of epithelialization as compared to simple ointment. Mice treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment also showed significantly (p < 0.05) short period of epithelialization when compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment.Treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, and 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment reduced period of epithelialization by 11.36%, 17.74%, and 14.17%, respectively, when compared to simple ointment (Table9).Table 9
Effects of crude extract on the period of epithelialization in burn wound.
Treatment groupPeriod of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment23.50 ± 0.34—5% (w/w) extract ointment20.83 ± 0.31a∗∗∗11.3610% (w/w) extract ointment19.33 ± 0.21a∗∗∗b∗17.740.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment20.17 ± 0.40a∗∗∗14.17Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


### 4.9. Histopathological Studies

#### 4.9.1. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization as well as few numbers of inflammatory cells while 5% (w/w) extract ointment-treated wound showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Nitrofurazone-treated wound showed moderate fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization (Table10). The histopathological test showed that wound treated with simple ointment contained a moderate number of inflammatory cells.Table 10
Effects of the crude extract on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment+++++++5% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++++0.2% nitrofurazone w/v ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


#### 4.9.2. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Solvent Fractions

Mice treated with 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and high neovascularization while treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Groups treated with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments showed moderate to high number of inflammatory cells, low fibroblast proliferation, invisible to low collagen deposition, and low neovascularization (Table11).Table 11
Effects of solvent fractions on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) AQF ointment++++++++++10% (w/w) AQF ointment+++++++++++5% (w/w) EAF ointment+—++++++10% (w/w) EAF ointment+++++++5% (w/w) NHF ointment+—+++++++10% (w/w) NHF ointment++++++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


#### 4.9.3. Histopathological Evaluation of Burned Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition while 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed moderate fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Treatment with 10% (w/w) and 5% (w/w) extract ointments also showed moderate and low neovascularization, respectively (Table12). As shown in Figure 10, histology of healed wound after being treated with simple ointment showed high number of inflammatory cells, less fibroblast proliferation, and collagen deposition.Table 12
Effects of the crude extract on histological of healed burn wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) extract ointment++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment++++++—+++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.Figure 10
Photomicrograph of skin tissue of crude and solvent fraction ointment-treated excision and incision wounds in mice. Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract (a). Excision wound treated with 5% (w/w) extract (b). Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction (c). Burn wound treated by 5% (w/w) extract (d). Burn wound treated by 10% (w/w) extract (e). Excision wound treated by simple ointment (f). Excision wound treated by 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate (g). Burn wound treated with 10% extract (h, i). CD: collagen deposition; FP: fibroblast proliferation; NV: neovascularization; RE: epithelialization; PMN: polymorphonuclear cells.


### 4.10. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity

#### 4.10.1. Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model

The extract inhibited ear edema significantly (p < 0.001) at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg as compared to 2% Tween 80. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also showed significant (p < 0.001) ear edema inhibition as compared to both 100 and 200 mg/kg. Similarly, indomethacin-treated mice showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in ear edema as compared to all groups treated with 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well 2% Tween 80.At 400 mg/kg, the extract inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 45.33%, whereas at 100 mg/kg, it inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 12.28%, compared to 2% Tween 80 (Table13).Table 13
Effects of the crude extract in xylene-induced ear edema model.
TreatmentEar swelling (mg) ± SEM% inhibition2% Tween 809.2 ± 0.16—Extract (100 mg/kg)8.07 ± 0.08a∗∗∗12.28Extract (200 mg/kg)7.78 ± 0.08a∗∗∗15.43Extract (400 mg/kg)5.03 ± 0.18 (abc)∗∗∗45.33Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)2.68 ± 0.06 (abcd)∗∗∗70.87Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


#### 4.10.2. Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma Test

At 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg, the extract significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits both wet weight (exudate) and dry weight (granuloma) of the cotton pellet as compared to 2% Tween 80. Similarly, treatment with extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits the wet weight of the cotton pellet when compared to 100 mg/kg.The extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg showed a significant reduction in dry cotton pellet weight (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to 100 mg/kg. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also significantly reduces (p < 0.001) both wet and dry weight of the cotton pellet formation when compared to 200 mg/kg.Indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in exudative deposits when compared to 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well as 2% Tween 80. Similarly, indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant inhibition (p < 0.001) in proliferative deposits when compared to all 200 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 2% Tween 80 as well as 400 mg/kg (p < 0.01).The extract at 400 mg/kg showed the highest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 33.80% and 39.00%, respectively. On the contrary, the extract at 100 mg/kg showed the lowest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 14.26% and 18.35%, respectively (Table14).Table 14
Effects of the crude extract on cotton pellet-induced granuloma test.
Treatment groupMean wet weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of wet weightMean dry cotton weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of dry weight2% Tween 80155.50 ± 1.6174.28 ± 1.29—Extract (100 mg/kg)133.32 ± 2.01a∗∗∗14.2661.21 ± 1.53a∗∗∗18.35Extract (200 mg/kg)118.60 ± 1.03 (ab)∗∗∗23.7354.12 ± 0.97a∗∗∗b∗∗27.14Extract (400 mg/kg)102.94 ± 1.58 (abc)∗∗∗33.8045.31 ± 1.09 (abc)∗∗∗39.00Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)91.85 ± 1.09 (abcd)∗∗∗40.9338.02 ± 1.41 (abc)∗∗∗d∗∗48.84Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


## 4.1. Preliminary Phytochemical Screening

Phytochemical screening of 80% methanol crude extract and solvent fractions showed the presence of different secondary metabolites (Table2).Table 2
Results of phytochemical screening of crude extract and solvent fractions.
S. nSecondary metaboliteTest usedCrude extractAqueous fractionEthyl acetate fractionn-Hexane fraction1AlkaloidsWagner’s test++−+2SaponinsFoam+++−3FlavonoidsShinoda’s test++++4PhenolsLead acetate test++−+5TanninsFerric chloride test++++6GlycosidesKeller–Kiliani test+++−7SteroidsSalkowski’s test++−−8AnthraquinonesSalkowski’s test++++9TerpenoidsBorntrager’s test+++++: present; −: absent


## 4.2. Acute Oral and Dermal Toxicity Test

No sign of toxicity was observed after oral administration of 2000 mg/kg of the extract as well as dermal application of 2000 mg/kg of the 10% (w/w) extract ointment within the first 24 and 48 hours, and no death was registered after 14 days of follow-up. The result suggests that oral LD50 of the plant extract is greater than 2000 mg/kg in mice.


## 4.3. Evaluation of Wound Healing Activity

### 4.3.1. Excision Wound Model

(1) Healing Activity of the Crude Extract. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.01) on day 2 and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on all post-wounding days, on day 2 (p < 0.05), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with both 10% (w/w) extract and 0.2% nitrofurazone ointments showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.001) and day 6 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment also showed better wound contraction on most post-wounding days as compared to 0.2% nitrofurazone ointment though the differences were insignificant (Table 3).Table 3
Effects of the crude extract in excision wound in mice.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% wound contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointmentDay 2288.08 ± 5.09 (8.25)268.67 ± 3.75a∗ (14.44)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)Day 4271.00 ± 4.45 (13.69)231.25 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (26.35)197.00 ± 4.20 (ab)∗∗∗ (37.26)199.00 ± 3.91 (ab)∗∗∗ (36.62)Day 6254.25 ± 5.11 (19.03)168.33 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (46.39)145.00 ± 3.31a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)145.00 ± 3.73a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)Day 8209.58 ± 6.25 (33.25)114.83 ± 4.62a∗∗∗ (63.43)100.92 ± 3.70a∗∗∗ (67.86)102.25 ± 4.28a∗∗∗ (67.44)Day 10150.42 ± 5.32 (52.10)69.92 ± 3.96a∗∗∗ (77.73)60.50 ± 3.37a∗∗∗ (80.73)58.00 ± 3.32a∗∗∗ (81.53)Day 12113.25 ± 3.52 (63.93)33.42 ± 1.88a∗∗∗ (89.36)28.33 ± 1.70a∗∗∗ (90.98)31.67 ± 1.69a∗∗∗ (89.91)Day 1467.50 ± 4.56 (78.50)8.17 ± 1.42a∗∗∗ (97.40)5.50 ± 0.72a∗∗∗ (98.25)7.33 ± 1.17a∗∗∗ (97.67)Day 1627.25 ± 7.43 (91.32)1.33 ± 0.84a∗∗∗ (99.56)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.00 ± 0.63a∗∗∗ (99.68)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Initial wound area was 314 mm2.Complete percentage of wound contraction for groups treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 16, 18, 18, and beyond, respectively (Figures4 and 5).Figure 4
Effects of the crude extract on contraction of excision wound.Figure 5
Excision wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


## 4.3.1. Excision Wound Model

(1) Healing Activity of the Crude Extract. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.01) on day 2 and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on all post-wounding days, on day 2 (p < 0.05), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with both 10% (w/w) extract and 0.2% nitrofurazone ointments showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.001) and day 6 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment also showed better wound contraction on most post-wounding days as compared to 0.2% nitrofurazone ointment though the differences were insignificant (Table 3).Table 3
Effects of the crude extract in excision wound in mice.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% wound contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointmentDay 2288.08 ± 5.09 (8.25)268.67 ± 3.75a∗ (14.44)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)264.09 ± 4.83a∗∗ (15.89)Day 4271.00 ± 4.45 (13.69)231.25 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (26.35)197.00 ± 4.20 (ab)∗∗∗ (37.26)199.00 ± 3.91 (ab)∗∗∗ (36.62)Day 6254.25 ± 5.11 (19.03)168.33 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (46.39)145.00 ± 3.31a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)145.00 ± 3.73a∗∗∗b∗∗ (53.82)Day 8209.58 ± 6.25 (33.25)114.83 ± 4.62a∗∗∗ (63.43)100.92 ± 3.70a∗∗∗ (67.86)102.25 ± 4.28a∗∗∗ (67.44)Day 10150.42 ± 5.32 (52.10)69.92 ± 3.96a∗∗∗ (77.73)60.50 ± 3.37a∗∗∗ (80.73)58.00 ± 3.32a∗∗∗ (81.53)Day 12113.25 ± 3.52 (63.93)33.42 ± 1.88a∗∗∗ (89.36)28.33 ± 1.70a∗∗∗ (90.98)31.67 ± 1.69a∗∗∗ (89.91)Day 1467.50 ± 4.56 (78.50)8.17 ± 1.42a∗∗∗ (97.40)5.50 ± 0.72a∗∗∗ (98.25)7.33 ± 1.17a∗∗∗ (97.67)Day 1627.25 ± 7.43 (91.32)1.33 ± 0.84a∗∗∗ (99.56)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.00 ± 0.63a∗∗∗ (99.68)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Initial wound area was 314 mm2.Complete percentage of wound contraction for groups treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 16, 18, 18, and beyond, respectively (Figures4 and 5).Figure 4
Effects of the crude extract on contraction of excision wound.Figure 5
Excision wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


## 4.4. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with both 5% (w/w) and 10% (w/w) extract ointment as well as 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment showed significantly (p < 0.001) short period of epithelialization as compared to simple ointment. Mean period of epithelialization in mice treated with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, and 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment has been reduced by 24.99%, 26.54%, and 25.79%, respectively, as compared to simple ointment (Table 4).Table 4
Effects of crude extract on the period of epithelialization in excision wound.
Treatment groupPeriod of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment21.33 ± 0.84—5% (w/w) extract ointment16.00 ± 0.37a∗∗∗24.9910% (w/w) extract ointment15.67 ± 0.21a∗∗∗26.540.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment15.83 ± 0.40a∗∗∗25.79Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment. ∗∗∗p<0.001


## 4.5. Healing Activity of Solvent Fractions

Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction on all post-wounding days as compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. Similarly, 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment (p < 0.01) as compared to all 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments on post-wounding day 2. From post-wounding day 4 onwards, 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointments showed highly significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction when compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments.Treatment with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed significant contraction from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.05) and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.01) as compared to simple ointment, while 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction from day 6 to 8 (p < 0.05), from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.01), and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 5% (w/w) hexane fraction ointment showed significant contraction on day 10 (p < 0.05) and from day 12 onwards (p < 0.01) as compared to simple ointment, while 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointment showed significant wound contraction from day 4 to 8 (p < 0.05), from day 10 to 12 (p < 0.01), and from day 14 onwards (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Nitrofurazone also showed significant wound contraction (p < 0.001) on all post-wounding days as compared to simple ointment (Table 5).Table 5
Effects of solvent fractions of in excised wounds.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) AQF ointment10% (w/w) AQF ointment5% (w/w) EAF ointment10% (w/w) EAF ointment5% (w/w) NHF ointment10% (w/w) NHF ointment0.2% (w/v) NF ointmentDay 2293.25 ± 1.37 (6.61)272.42 ± 1.48 (13.24) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗272.50 ± 1.47 (13.22) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗290.08 ± 2.20 (7.62)288.08 ± 2.11 (8.25)282.75 ± 1.22 (9.95)a∗∗279.33 ± 1.64 (11.04)a∗∗∗273.17 ± 1.68 (13.00)a∗∗∗∗∗Day 4268.17 ± 1.70 (14.60)239.67 ± 1.98 (23.67) (abc)∗∗∗f∗g∗237.83 ± 2.14 (24.26) (abc)∗∗∗(fg)∗∗258.67 ± 1.36 (17.62)a∗∗251.58 ± 1.08 (19.88)a∗∗∗248.00 ± 1.04 (21.02)a∗∗∗247.50 ± 1.44 (21.18)a∗∗∗244.42 ± 1.43 (22.16)a∗∗∗Day 6235.67 ± 2.25 (24.95)196.33 ± 1.44 (37.47) (abc)∗∗∗193.42 ± 1.68 (38.40) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗217.33 ± 1.45 (30.79)a∗∗∗219.33 ± 1.93 (30.15)a∗∗∗202.50 ± 1.22 (35.51)a∗∗∗197.50 ± 1.43 (37.10)a∗∗∗191.33 ± 1.89 (39.07)a∗∗∗Day 8194.50 ± 1.93 (38.06)142.67 ± 1.35 (54.56) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗139.17 ± 1.51 (55.68) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗169.42 ± 1.35 (46.04)a∗∗∗167.17 ± 1.67 (46.76)a∗∗∗153.17 ± 1.20 (51.22)a∗∗∗149.17 ± 2.12 (52.49)a∗∗∗144.58 ± 1.45 (53.96)a∗∗∗Day 10145.25 ± 2.63 (53.74)107.33 ± 2.38 (65.82) (abc)∗∗∗100.08 ± 1.37 (68.13) (abc)∗∗∗f∗128.25 ± 2.12 (59.16)a∗∗∗126.08 ± 2.20 (59.85)a∗∗∗111.75 ± 2.44 (64.41)a∗∗∗107.50 ± 2.54 (65.76)a∗∗∗102.25 ± 1.36 (67.44)a∗∗∗Day 12107.67 ± 1.92 (65.71)67.75 ± 2.05 (78.42) (abc)∗∗∗66.17 ± 1.46 (78.93) (abc)∗∗∗95.17 ± 1.17 (69.69)a∗∗∗92.08 ± 1.15 (70.68)a∗∗∗71.17 ± 1.85 (77.33)a∗∗∗70.42 ± 1.93 (77.57)a∗∗∗67.92 ± 1.95 (78.37)a∗∗∗Day 1473.17 ± 2.33 (76.70)28.33 ± 1.48 (90.98) (abc)∗∗∗f∗∗26.58 ± 1.36 (91.54) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗56.33 ± 1.56 (82.06)a∗∗∗51.75 ± 1.42 (83.52)a∗∗∗37.58 ± 1.58 (88.03)a∗∗∗33.75 ± 1.22 (89.25)a∗∗∗30.92 ± 1.46 (90.15)a∗∗∗Day 1637.67 ± 2.34 (88.00)2.83 ± 1.35 (99.10) (abc)∗∗∗0.00 ± 0.00 (100.00) (abcd)∗∗∗g∗22.33 ± 1.29 (92.89)a∗∗∗17.75 ± 1.28 (94.35)a∗∗∗8.83 ± 0.74 (97.19)a∗∗∗7.08 ± 1.76 (97.75)a∗∗∗3.50 ± 1.69 (98.89)a∗∗∗Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n=6) and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test were used for analysis; acompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% w/w EAF, ccompared to 10% w/w EAF; dcompared to 5% w/w NHF; fcompared to 10% w/w NHF; gcompared to 0.2% w/V nitrofurazone oint. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The initial wound area was 314 mm2, where AQF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction: NHF: n-hexane fraction. NF: NitrofurazoneMice treated with 10% (w/w) aqueous fractions ointment showed complete wound closure by day 16 while it took beyond day 16 for complete wound closure by other fraction ointments (Figures6 and 7).Figure 6
Effects of solvent fractions on the percent of contraction in excision wound in mice. ADF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; NHF: n-hexane fraction.Figure 7
Excision wound healing progression after treated with solvent fractions.


## 4.6. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed significantly short period of epithelialization (p < 0.001) as compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, and 5% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. It also showed significantly short period of epithelialization (p < 0.01) as compared to both 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments. Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment reduced period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.001) when compared to all simple, 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments.Groups treated with both 5% and 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointments reduced the period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, treatments with both 5% and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments also reduced the period of epithelialization significantly (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed the highest percentage of reduction in the period of epithelialization, 20.85%; on the contrary, treatment with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction ointment showed the lowest percentage, 6.65%, as compared to simple ointment (Table6).Table 6
Effects of solvent fractions on the period of epithelialization in excision wound.
Treatment groupMean period of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment20.00 ± 0.37—5% (w/w) AQF ointment16.67 ± 0.33 (abd)∗∗∗ (ce)∗∗16.6510% (w/w) AQF ointment15.83 ± 0.17 (abcde)∗∗∗20.855% (w/w) EAF ointment18.67 ± 0.21 (a)∗6.6510% (w/w) EAF ointment18.33 ± 0.21 (a)∗∗8.355% (w/w) NHF ointment18.50 ± 0.22 (a)∗∗7.5010% (w/w) NHF ointment18.17 ± 0.17 (a)∗∗∗9.150.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment16.50 ± 0.22 (abcd)∗∗∗ (e)∗∗17.50Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to the negative control; bcompared to 5% (w/w) EAF ointment; ccompared to 10% (w/w) EAF ointment; dcompared to 5% (w/w) NHF ointment; ecompared to 10% (w/w) NHF ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. AQF: aqueous fraction; EAF: ethyl acetate fraction; NHF: n-hexane fraction.


## 4.7. Healing Activity of the Extract in Incision Wound

Groups treated with 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant (p < 0.001) increases in breaking resistance as compared to both simple ointments and left untreated groups. Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed the highest percentage of tensile strength, 74.00%, while the simple ointment group showed the least percentage of tensile strength, 12.56%, as compared to left untreated group (Table 7).Table 7
Effects of the crude extract on incision wound.
Treatment groupMean tensile strength ± SEMPercent of tensile strengthUntreated169.78 ± 3.41—Simple ointment191.11 ± 3.1812.565% (w/w) extract ointment282.28 ± 3.17 (ab)∗∗∗47.7110% (w/w) extract ointment332.52 ± 4.87 (ab)∗∗∗74.000.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment330.48 ± 2.80 (ab)∗∗∗72.93Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to the untreated group; bcompared to the simple ointment-treated group. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


### 4.7.1. Healing Activity of the Extract in Burn Wound

(1) Wound Contraction. Mice treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 2 (p < 0.05), on day 4 (p < 0.01), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, mice treated with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.05) and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 6 (p < 0.05) and day 8 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Similarly, treatment with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment showed significant contraction on day 8 (p < 0.05) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment (Table 8).Table 8
Effects of the crude extract on burn wound.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) NF ointmentDay 2295.33 ± 0.88 (1.56)292.17 ± 1.78 (2.61)288.42 ± 1.79a∗ (3.86)289.17 ± 1.41a∗ (3.61)Day 4276.25 ± 2.00 (7.92)266.67 ± 2.18a∗ (11.11)262.08 ± 2.41a∗∗ (12.64)264.08 ± 2.55a∗∗ (11.97)Day 6246.25 ± 1.54 (17.92)219.75 ± 1.99a∗∗∗ (26.75)210.17 ± 1.87a∗∗∗b∗ (29.94)217.25 ± 2.24a∗∗∗ (27.58)Day 8210.75 ± 1.35 (29.75)174.83 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (41.72)161.75 ± 2.29a∗∗∗b∗∗ (46.08)166.42 ± 2.15a∗∗∗b∗ (44.52)Day 10179.33 ± 2.02 (40.22)131.00 ± 2.00a∗∗∗ (56.33)123.17 ± 1.74a∗∗∗ (58.94)124.58 ± 2.34a∗∗∗ (58.47)Day 12146.50 ± 1.47 (51.17)94.00 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (68.67)86.00 ± 1.53a∗∗∗ (71.33)89.50 ± 2.09a∗∗∗ (70.17)Day 14120.83 ± 1.96 (59.72)56.08 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (81.31)49.75 ± 1.31a∗∗∗ (83.42)50.42 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (83.19)Day 1691.67 ± 2.82 (69.44)26.00 ± 1.79a∗∗∗ (91.33)21.92 ± 0.92a∗∗∗ (92.69)25.67 ± 1.61a∗∗∗ (91.44)Day 1868.83 ± 2.11 (77.06)10.67 ± 0.85a∗∗∗ (96.44)5.58 ±0 .61a∗∗∗ (98.14)8.92 ± 1.04a∗∗∗∗(97.03)Day 2038.50 ± 1.90 (87.17)3.08 ± 1.04a∗∗∗ (98.97)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.17 ± 0.54a∗∗∗ (99.61)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The initial wound area was 300 mm2.Complete wound closure after treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 22, 20, 22, and beyond, respectively (Figures8 and 9).Figure 8
Effects of crude extract on contraction of burn wound.Figure 9
Burn wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


## 4.7.1. Healing Activity of the Extract in Burn Wound

(1) Wound Contraction. Mice treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 2 (p < 0.05), on day 4 (p < 0.01), and on the rest of the post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment. Similarly, mice treated with 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 4 (p < 0.05) and on other post-wounding days (p < 0.001) as compared to simple ointment.Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant wound contraction on day 6 (p < 0.05) and day 8 (p < 0.01) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. Similarly, treatment with 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment showed significant contraction on day 8 (p < 0.05) as compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment (Table 8).Table 8
Effects of the crude extract on burn wound.
Post-wounding daysWound area (mm2) ± SEM (% contraction)Simple ointment5% (w/w) extract ointment10% (w/w) extract ointment0.2% (w/v) NF ointmentDay 2295.33 ± 0.88 (1.56)292.17 ± 1.78 (2.61)288.42 ± 1.79a∗ (3.86)289.17 ± 1.41a∗ (3.61)Day 4276.25 ± 2.00 (7.92)266.67 ± 2.18a∗ (11.11)262.08 ± 2.41a∗∗ (12.64)264.08 ± 2.55a∗∗ (11.97)Day 6246.25 ± 1.54 (17.92)219.75 ± 1.99a∗∗∗ (26.75)210.17 ± 1.87a∗∗∗b∗ (29.94)217.25 ± 2.24a∗∗∗ (27.58)Day 8210.75 ± 1.35 (29.75)174.83 ± 2.52a∗∗∗ (41.72)161.75 ± 2.29a∗∗∗b∗∗ (46.08)166.42 ± 2.15a∗∗∗b∗ (44.52)Day 10179.33 ± 2.02 (40.22)131.00 ± 2.00a∗∗∗ (56.33)123.17 ± 1.74a∗∗∗ (58.94)124.58 ± 2.34a∗∗∗ (58.47)Day 12146.50 ± 1.47 (51.17)94.00 ± 2.85a∗∗∗ (68.67)86.00 ± 1.53a∗∗∗ (71.33)89.50 ± 2.09a∗∗∗ (70.17)Day 14120.83 ± 1.96 (59.72)56.08 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (81.31)49.75 ± 1.31a∗∗∗ (83.42)50.42 ± 1.96a∗∗∗ (83.19)Day 1691.67 ± 2.82 (69.44)26.00 ± 1.79a∗∗∗ (91.33)21.92 ± 0.92a∗∗∗ (92.69)25.67 ± 1.61a∗∗∗ (91.44)Day 1868.83 ± 2.11 (77.06)10.67 ± 0.85a∗∗∗ (96.44)5.58 ±0 .61a∗∗∗ (98.14)8.92 ± 1.04a∗∗∗∗(97.03)Day 2038.50 ± 1.90 (87.17)3.08 ± 1.04a∗∗∗ (98.97)0.00 ± 0.00a∗∗∗ (100.00)1.17 ± 0.54a∗∗∗ (99.61)Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001. The initial wound area was 300 mm2.Complete wound closure after treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment, and simple ointment was observed on day 22, 20, 22, and beyond, respectively (Figures8 and 9).Figure 8
Effects of crude extract on contraction of burn wound.Figure 9
Burn wound healing progression after treated with the crude extract.


## 4.8. Period of Epithelialization

Treatment with 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed significantly (p < 0.001) short period of epithelialization as compared to simple ointment. Mice treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointment also showed significantly (p < 0.05) short period of epithelialization when compared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment.Treatment with 5% (w/w) extract ointment, 10% (w/w) extract ointment, and 0.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment reduced period of epithelialization by 11.36%, 17.74%, and 14.17%, respectively, when compared to simple ointment (Table9).Table 9
Effects of crude extract on the period of epithelialization in burn wound.
Treatment groupPeriod of epithelialization in days% decrease in the period of epithelializationSimple ointment23.50 ± 0.34—5% (w/w) extract ointment20.83 ± 0.31a∗∗∗11.3610% (w/w) extract ointment19.33 ± 0.21a∗∗∗b∗17.740.2% (w/v) nitrofurazone ointment20.17 ± 0.40a∗∗∗14.17Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to simple ointment; bcompared to 5% (w/w) extract ointment. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


## 4.9. Histopathological Studies

### 4.9.1. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization as well as few numbers of inflammatory cells while 5% (w/w) extract ointment-treated wound showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Nitrofurazone-treated wound showed moderate fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization (Table10). The histopathological test showed that wound treated with simple ointment contained a moderate number of inflammatory cells.Table 10
Effects of the crude extract on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment+++++++5% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++++0.2% nitrofurazone w/v ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


### 4.9.2. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Solvent Fractions

Mice treated with 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and high neovascularization while treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Groups treated with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments showed moderate to high number of inflammatory cells, low fibroblast proliferation, invisible to low collagen deposition, and low neovascularization (Table11).Table 11
Effects of solvent fractions on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) AQF ointment++++++++++10% (w/w) AQF ointment+++++++++++5% (w/w) EAF ointment+—++++++10% (w/w) EAF ointment+++++++5% (w/w) NHF ointment+—+++++++10% (w/w) NHF ointment++++++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


### 4.9.3. Histopathological Evaluation of Burned Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition while 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed moderate fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Treatment with 10% (w/w) and 5% (w/w) extract ointments also showed moderate and low neovascularization, respectively (Table12). As shown in Figure 10, histology of healed wound after being treated with simple ointment showed high number of inflammatory cells, less fibroblast proliferation, and collagen deposition.Table 12
Effects of the crude extract on histological of healed burn wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) extract ointment++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment++++++—+++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.Figure 10
Photomicrograph of skin tissue of crude and solvent fraction ointment-treated excision and incision wounds in mice. Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract (a). Excision wound treated with 5% (w/w) extract (b). Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction (c). Burn wound treated by 5% (w/w) extract (d). Burn wound treated by 10% (w/w) extract (e). Excision wound treated by simple ointment (f). Excision wound treated by 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate (g). Burn wound treated with 10% extract (h, i). CD: collagen deposition; FP: fibroblast proliferation; NV: neovascularization; RE: epithelialization; PMN: polymorphonuclear cells.


## 4.9.1. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization as well as few numbers of inflammatory cells while 5% (w/w) extract ointment-treated wound showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Nitrofurazone-treated wound showed moderate fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization (Table10). The histopathological test showed that wound treated with simple ointment contained a moderate number of inflammatory cells.Table 10
Effects of the crude extract on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment+++++++5% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment+++++++++++0.2% nitrofurazone w/v ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


## 4.9.2. Histopathological Evaluation of Excised Wound Treated with Solvent Fractions

Mice treated with 5% (w/w) aqueous fraction ointment showed high fibroblast proliferation, moderate collagen deposition, and high neovascularization while treatment with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction showed high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization. Groups treated with 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 10% (w/w) ethyl acetate fraction, 5% (w/w) hexane fraction, and 10% (w/w) hexane fraction ointments showed moderate to high number of inflammatory cells, low fibroblast proliferation, invisible to low collagen deposition, and low neovascularization (Table11).Table 11
Effects of solvent fractions on histology of healed excision wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) AQF ointment++++++++++10% (w/w) AQF ointment+++++++++++5% (w/w) EAF ointment+—++++++10% (w/w) EAF ointment+++++++5% (w/w) NHF ointment+—+++++++10% (w/w) NHF ointment++++++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.


## 4.9.3. Histopathological Evaluation of Burned Wound Treated with Crude Extract

Treatment with 10% (w/w) extract ointments showed high fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition while 5% (w/w) extract ointment showed moderate fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Treatment with 10% (w/w) and 5% (w/w) extract ointments also showed moderate and low neovascularization, respectively (Table12). As shown in Figure 10, histology of healed wound after being treated with simple ointment showed high number of inflammatory cells, less fibroblast proliferation, and collagen deposition.Table 12
Effects of the crude extract on histological of healed burn wound in mice.
GroupFPCDMNCPMNCNVSimple ointment++++++++—5% (w/w) extract ointment++++++++10% (w/w) extract ointment++++++—+++0.2% w/v nitrofurazone ointment++++++++Low number (+), moderate number (++), and high number (+++) for wound remodeling. FP: fibroblast proliferation; CD: collagen deposition; MNC: mononuclear cells; PMNC: polymorphonuclear cells; NV: neovascularization.Figure 10
Photomicrograph of skin tissue of crude and solvent fraction ointment-treated excision and incision wounds in mice. Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) extract (a). Excision wound treated with 5% (w/w) extract (b). Excision wound treated with 10% (w/w) aqueous fraction (c). Burn wound treated by 5% (w/w) extract (d). Burn wound treated by 10% (w/w) extract (e). Excision wound treated by simple ointment (f). Excision wound treated by 5% (w/w) ethyl acetate (g). Burn wound treated with 10% extract (h, i). CD: collagen deposition; FP: fibroblast proliferation; NV: neovascularization; RE: epithelialization; PMN: polymorphonuclear cells.


## 4.10. Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity

### 4.10.1. Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model

The extract inhibited ear edema significantly (p < 0.001) at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg as compared to 2% Tween 80. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also showed significant (p < 0.001) ear edema inhibition as compared to both 100 and 200 mg/kg. Similarly, indomethacin-treated mice showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in ear edema as compared to all groups treated with 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well 2% Tween 80.At 400 mg/kg, the extract inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 45.33%, whereas at 100 mg/kg, it inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 12.28%, compared to 2% Tween 80 (Table13).Table 13
Effects of the crude extract in xylene-induced ear edema model.
TreatmentEar swelling (mg) ± SEM% inhibition2% Tween 809.2 ± 0.16—Extract (100 mg/kg)8.07 ± 0.08a∗∗∗12.28Extract (200 mg/kg)7.78 ± 0.08a∗∗∗15.43Extract (400 mg/kg)5.03 ± 0.18 (abc)∗∗∗45.33Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)2.68 ± 0.06 (abcd)∗∗∗70.87Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


### 4.10.2. Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma Test

At 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg, the extract significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits both wet weight (exudate) and dry weight (granuloma) of the cotton pellet as compared to 2% Tween 80. Similarly, treatment with extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits the wet weight of the cotton pellet when compared to 100 mg/kg.The extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg showed a significant reduction in dry cotton pellet weight (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to 100 mg/kg. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also significantly reduces (p < 0.001) both wet and dry weight of the cotton pellet formation when compared to 200 mg/kg.Indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in exudative deposits when compared to 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well as 2% Tween 80. Similarly, indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant inhibition (p < 0.001) in proliferative deposits when compared to all 200 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 2% Tween 80 as well as 400 mg/kg (p < 0.01).The extract at 400 mg/kg showed the highest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 33.80% and 39.00%, respectively. On the contrary, the extract at 100 mg/kg showed the lowest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 14.26% and 18.35%, respectively (Table14).Table 14
Effects of the crude extract on cotton pellet-induced granuloma test.
Treatment groupMean wet weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of wet weightMean dry cotton weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of dry weight2% Tween 80155.50 ± 1.6174.28 ± 1.29—Extract (100 mg/kg)133.32 ± 2.01a∗∗∗14.2661.21 ± 1.53a∗∗∗18.35Extract (200 mg/kg)118.60 ± 1.03 (ab)∗∗∗23.7354.12 ± 0.97a∗∗∗b∗∗27.14Extract (400 mg/kg)102.94 ± 1.58 (abc)∗∗∗33.8045.31 ± 1.09 (abc)∗∗∗39.00Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)91.85 ± 1.09 (abcd)∗∗∗40.9338.02 ± 1.41 (abc)∗∗∗d∗∗48.84Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


## 4.10.1. Xylene-Induced Ear Edema Model

The extract inhibited ear edema significantly (p < 0.001) at 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg as compared to 2% Tween 80. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also showed significant (p < 0.001) ear edema inhibition as compared to both 100 and 200 mg/kg. Similarly, indomethacin-treated mice showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in ear edema as compared to all groups treated with 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well 2% Tween 80.At 400 mg/kg, the extract inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 45.33%, whereas at 100 mg/kg, it inhibited ear edema in a percentage of 12.28%, compared to 2% Tween 80 (Table13).Table 13
Effects of the crude extract in xylene-induced ear edema model.
TreatmentEar swelling (mg) ± SEM% inhibition2% Tween 809.2 ± 0.16—Extract (100 mg/kg)8.07 ± 0.08a∗∗∗12.28Extract (200 mg/kg)7.78 ± 0.08a∗∗∗15.43Extract (400 mg/kg)5.03 ± 0.18 (abc)∗∗∗45.33Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)2.68 ± 0.06 (abcd)∗∗∗70.87Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


## 4.10.2. Cotton Pellet-Induced Granuloma Test

At 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg, the extract significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits both wet weight (exudate) and dry weight (granuloma) of the cotton pellet as compared to 2% Tween 80. Similarly, treatment with extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg significantly (p < 0.001) inhibits the wet weight of the cotton pellet when compared to 100 mg/kg.The extract at 200 mg/kg and 400 mg/kg showed a significant reduction in dry cotton pellet weight (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively) as compared to 100 mg/kg. Treatment with 400 mg/kg also significantly reduces (p < 0.001) both wet and dry weight of the cotton pellet formation when compared to 200 mg/kg.Indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant (p < 0.001) inhibition in exudative deposits when compared to 100 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg, and 400 mg/kg as well as 2% Tween 80. Similarly, indomethacin at 10 mg/kg showed significant inhibition (p < 0.001) in proliferative deposits when compared to all 200 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg, and 2% Tween 80 as well as 400 mg/kg (p < 0.01).The extract at 400 mg/kg showed the highest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 33.80% and 39.00%, respectively. On the contrary, the extract at 100 mg/kg showed the lowest percentage of exudative deposits and granuloma inhibition, 14.26% and 18.35%, respectively (Table14).Table 14
Effects of the crude extract on cotton pellet-induced granuloma test.
Treatment groupMean wet weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of wet weightMean dry cotton weight (mg) ± SEM% inhibition of dry weight2% Tween 80155.50 ± 1.6174.28 ± 1.29—Extract (100 mg/kg)133.32 ± 2.01a∗∗∗14.2661.21 ± 1.53a∗∗∗18.35Extract (200 mg/kg)118.60 ± 1.03 (ab)∗∗∗23.7354.12 ± 0.97a∗∗∗b∗∗27.14Extract (400 mg/kg)102.94 ± 1.58 (abc)∗∗∗33.8045.31 ± 1.09 (abc)∗∗∗39.00Indomethacin (10 mg/kg)91.85 ± 1.09 (abcd)∗∗∗40.9338.02 ± 1.41 (abc)∗∗∗d∗∗48.84Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6), and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey test was used for analysis. aCompared to 2% Tween 80; bcompared to 100 mg/kg; ccompared to 200 mg/kg; dcompared to 400 mg/kg. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.


## 5. Discussion

The plant material was found to be safe after oral and dermal toxicity test which is in line with the safety profile ofTrichilia emetica Vahl, a plant from the same genus [34].Treatment with 5% and 10% (w/w) extract ointment showed significant (p < 0.001) wound contraction in excision wound model. The percent of wound contraction produced by 10% (w/w) extract ointment on day 14 (98.25%) is comparable to that of Becium grandiflorum Lam which showed 100% contraction by day 14 [25]. This fast wound contraction shown by the plant extract could be due to high fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization as evidenced by histopathological analysis. High fibroblast proliferation leads to rapid wound contraction by differentiating to myofibroblast that increases the pulling forces between the cells on the opposite side of the wound while collagen contributes to the physical strength of the healing tissues through binding them together. The regenerated blood capillaries in the healing excision wounds provide the granular cells with oxygen and nutrient supplies that finally contribute to the complete healing of the wound [35].Rapid wound contraction and a short period of epithelialization shown by the plant extract could also be highly determined by the accumulation of secondary metabolites that largely determine its medicinal value. Bioactive compounds in the secondary metabolites could possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial activities. Previous studies showed that 50% methanol extract ofTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves possesses antioxidant activity [36]. Oxidants scavenge normal cells around the wound and cause cellular protein and DNA damage which stimulate signal transduction that prolongs the inflammation phase of wound healing and finally delays wound healing [37]. Excessive oxidants can also augment the production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Excessive MMPs especially, collagenases, delay wound healing by degrading components of ECM especially collagens [38]. Hence, the antioxidant property of Trichilia dregeana Sond leaves might contribute to its wound healing activity.Previous studies also showed that different solvent extracts (ethyl acetate, ethanol, aqueous, and methanol) ofTrichilia dregeana Sond leaves showed microbial inhibiting activities against common wound infecting microbes including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia as well as against Candida albicans [39, 40]. Bacteria can delay wound healing by producing proteolytic enzymes, decreasing blood supply, promoting disordered leukocytic function, and releasing unpleasant toxins that damage regenerating cells [41]. Antimicrobial activities of the plant might contribute to wound healing by preventing infections. This is consistent with a previously conducted study on Zehneria scabra which described that the plant’s antibacterial activity facilitates wound healing [42].In the excision wound model of solvent fractions, the aqueous fractions showed a better effect. This difference could be related to either the accumulation of the majority of secondary metabolites in an aqueous fraction [43]. High fibroblast proliferation, collagen deposition, and neovascularization shown by histopathological analysis could also indicate the presence of bioactive compounds in the aqueous fraction that might contribute to its superior activity to other fractions.The crude extract was also evaluated for wound healing activity in incision wounds by measuring the tensile strength, the resistance of the tissue to break under external force. The significant resistance to breaking might be related to the quality of the repaired tissue which is mainly determined by the regeneration of collagen. Collagen gives strength and integrity to the healed wound that helps the cells to adhere together and resist breaking tension [44]. This significant resistance to breaking shown by Trichilia dregeana Sond leaf crude extracts could be due to the plant extract’s role in promoting collagen synthesis, maturation, and stabilization.Wound healing activity of the plant extract was also evaluated in the partial-thickness burn wound model in which it showed significant contraction. The creation of partial-thickness burn wound forms three zones which are zone of necrosis at the area of applications, zone of hypoperfusion in the area surrounding the zone of necrosis, and zone of inflammation just next to a zone of hypoperfusion. Microbial colonization, persistent hypoperfusion, excessive free radical generation, and severe inflammation advance the partial-thickness wound to full-thickness wound which delays the healing and makes it more complicated [45]. In previously conducted studies, different solvent extracts of Trichilia dregeana Sond leaves possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activity [36, 39, 40]. These properties of the plant extract might contribute to its wound healing activity in different ways. The antibacterial activity could prevent infections, the antioxidant activity might inhibit damage to zone hypoperfusion cells due to excessive oxidants, and the anti-inflammatory activity could also contribute to the rapid healing by inhibiting/preventing the development of chronic inflammation in a zone of inflammation.Trichilia dregeana Sond leaf extracts contain alkaloids, phenols, tannins, flavonoids, anthraquinones, terpenoids, steroids, and saponins as evidenced by phytochemical tests. This finding is consistent with the phytochemical content of Trichilia emetica Vahl, a plant from the same genus [46]. Different secondary metabolites possess different pharmacological activities including promoting wound healing and preventing infections. Polyphenols have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and astringent activities. The astringent properties of tannins and other phenols could facilitate wound healing through promoting contraction and enhancing rapid scab formation [43].Trichilia dregeana Sond leaf extracts significantly inhibited ear edema formation in the xylene-induced ear edema model. This suggests the plant extract has activity against acute inflammation. This anti-inflammatory activity of the plant is in line with in vitro tests done previously which showed that different solvent extracts of Trichilia dregeana Sond leaves possess anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting COX 1 and 2 [39, 40, 47]. In the wound healing process, any factor that prolongs the inflammatory phase delays healing and leads to the development of chronic wounds. Thus, the anti-inflammatory activity of the plant extract could contribute to its wound healing activity by inhibiting the formation and release of proinflammatory cytokines since overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines can worsen and prolong the inflammation phase. The inhibition of COX further inhibits the formation of PGE2 which reduces the pain sensation threshold that improves the feeding behavior and general well-being of the test subject and finally contributes to the rapid healing [48].In the cotton-induced granuloma formation test model, the extract significantly inhibited exudate and granuloma formation which is comparable to the effect shown byAchyranthes aspera L. [49]. These activities of the extract reflect its effectiveness against chronic inflammation. During inflammatory phases of wound healing, excessive exudate production delays wound healing by macerating healthy tissue in the peri-wound area and impairing migration of cells across the wound surface. Trapping of exudate into the skin surface makes the skin more susceptible to trauma by swelling the keratinocytes and weakening the stratum corneum [50]. Exudate formation inhibiting activity of the plant extract could contribute to wound healing by preventing wound complications that delay healing because of excessive exudate production.The extract also inhibits the formation of granuloma significantly. More monocytes were drawn to the area, where they joined to create granulomas around the foreign body that were multinucleated giant cells [51]. Prostaglandin D2 is responsible for the recruitment of more monocytes to the inflammatory site [52]. In previous studies, the plant extracts demonstrated the ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase, which further inhibits the synthesis of PGD2, and this may be the mechanism by which it prevents the formation of granulomas.


## 6. Conclusion

Eighty percent methanol extract ofT. dregeana showed wound healing activity by increasing wound contraction, decreasing period of epithelialization, and increasing resistance to breakage in different wound models. Besides, the plant extract also showed anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting ear edema formation, exudate formation, and granuloma formation in different inflammation models. The aqueous fraction showed wound-healing activity by accelerating wound contraction and shortening the period of epithelialization in the excision wound model, which supports the conventional uses in which traditional healers first soak the plant in water before applying it to the wound.



---

*Source: 9980866-2023-01-19.xml*