# Material and Structural Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composites as Thin Overlay for Steel Bridge Deck Pavement

Authors: Hui Zhang; Chengqi Zhou; Kuan Li; Peiwei Gao; Youqiang Pan; Zhixiang Zhang
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Fatigue cracks are main damages to steel bridge deck pavement with thermosetting epoxy asphalt. By combining a high-toughness resin material with fiber woven fabrics, this study formed an ultrathin overlay of fiber-reinforced high-toughness resin to improve cracking resistance of pavement. Through theoretical measurement and bending test, this research studied change laws of bending and tensile properties of epoxy asphalt concrete after fiber reinforcement and analyzed bending strength and the maximum failure strain of beams at different temperatures. Moreover, the reinforcing effects of different fibers were discussed. It is found that bending strength, maximum failure strain, and stiffness modulus of the beams with epoxy asphalt are improved after fiber reinforcement. With the decrease of temperature, after fiber reinforcement, the mode of bending failure of the epoxy asphalt mixture (EAM) changes from brittle fracture into shear failure, accompanied with significant yield phenomenon. Furthermore, organic carbon fiber is sensitive to influences of temperature, while glass fiber is least sensitive to temperature.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Steel bridge deck pavement is to pave thin layer structures with thickness of 5∼8 cm on the orthotropic plates. Due to flexibility of steel bridge deck, there are extremely high application requirements for pavement materials, mainly including coordinated deformation capacity, waterproofness, high strength, and excellent fatigue performance of steel plates [1–3]. At present, typical pavement schemes, such as epoxy asphalt, gussasphalt, and stone matrix asphalt (SMA), are mainly used [4]. Of them, epoxy asphalt materials with higher antirutting performance at high temperature and bending fatigue performance are universally used in China [5, 6].Different from thermoplastic asphalt pavement, because epoxy asphalt is a thermosetting material, cracking as shown in Figure1, a main type of damages mainly occurs in wheel track bands, longitudinal diaphragms of steel box beams, and ends of U-shaped ribs under long-term load [7, 8]. At present, technologies for preventive maintenance of asphalt pavement have been mainly studied, thus proposing some relative mature schemes, such as fog sealing layer, slurry seal, microsurfacing, and thin overlays. However, at present, there are no mature technologies and materials for timely preventive maintenance of cracks on epoxy asphalt pavement.Figure 1
Fatigue cracks in epoxy asphalt on steel bridge deck pavement.
(a)
(b)
(c)The traditional technologies for preventive maintenance of asphalt pavement are mainly based on asphalt materials. Due to limited strength and low bond strength of the materials with epoxy asphalt pavement, peeling and cracking easily appear. The research on the maintenance technology of steel bridge deck pavement started relatively late. There are some researches on cracks, swelling, and patching [9∼11] and some achievements in pavement in which the original hot-blended epoxy asphalt is replaced with new cold-blended epoxy resin materials are mainly obtained. However, there are few technologies for preventive maintenance of bridge deck. The authors and other researchers have reported the scheme of preventive maintenance of bridge deck using epoxy resin seal [12, 13]. Because of high requirements for deformation capacity of materials on steel bridge deck pavement, fatigue cracking easily appears when using the general scheme of epoxy resin and synchronous surface dressing.In order to further improve tensile resistance of pavement materials, the research results of the fiber-reinforced asphalt mixture have been reported in many literatures, and the optimal mixing amount and performance mechanisms of the polyester fiber in the asphalt mixture have been proposed [14–16]. As composites emerge, researchers have conducted research and made breakthrough in high-temperature performance, vitrification, and fatigue properties of fiber-reinforced resin materials, which makes it possible for the materials to be applied in engineering of the transportation industry [17–19].Based on a high-toughness resin material and its combination with fiber woven fabrics, the research prepared an ultrathin overlay of fiber-reinforced high-toughness resin with the thickness of only about 5 mm. The overlay enhanced cracking resistance of the existing epoxy pavement, thus extending service life of steel bridge deck pavement with epoxy asphalt. It is expected to provide supports for research and engineering application of technologies for preventive maintenance of steel bridge deck pavement with epoxy asphalt.


## 2. Materials and Experimental Methods

### 2.1. Experimental Materials

This study used the Bv epoxy asphalt mixture (EAM), which was produced by ChemCo Systems Company in the United States and composed of component A (liquid bisphenol A epoxy resin) and component B (homogeneous compositions comprising petroleum asphalt and curing agent) with the ratio of 100: 518. Special aggregates for steel bridge deck pavement produced by Jiangsu Maodi Group Co., Ltd. and mineral powder manufactured from limestone in Jurong county, Jiangsu province, China, were utilized. The proportion of mineral aggregates, i.e., 1# aggregate (with diameter of 10∼13 mm), 2# aggregate (with diameter of 5∼10 mm), 3# aggregate (with diameter of 3∼5 mm), 4# aggregate (with diameter of 1∼3 mm), 5# aggregate (with diameter of 0.075∼1 mm), and mineral powder was 2.5%: 22.5%: 21.5%: 22%: 23%: 8.5%. Controlling the resultant gradation according to the median of the gradation range, the results are shown in Table1. The asphalt-aggregate ratio was 6.5%.Table 1
The aggregate gradation used in this study.
Mesh (mm)
Mass percentage of aggregates passing through meshes (square mesh, mm) (%)
13.2
9.5
4.75
2.36
0.6
0.075
Grading requirements
100
95∼100
65∼85
50∼70
28∼40
7∼14
Resultant gradation
100.0
99.7
75.2
59.3
34.5
11.0
Median of gradation
100.0
97.5
75.0
60.0
34.0
10.5The used RPF high-toughness epoxy resin was provided by Jiangsu SinoRoad Transportation Science and Technology Co., Ltd., China, and comprised component A (polyurethane-modified epoxy resin) and component B (fatty amine curing agent) with the ratio of 4 : 1. By referring to the ASTM D638-2014 test method, the tensile strength and elongation of high-toughness resin were measured through tensile test. The tensile strength, elongation at fracture, and tensile elastic modulus were 25.2 MPa, 63.2%, and about 40 MPa, respectively, tested at 23 ± 1°C and a stretching rate of 50 mm/min.In reference to the ASTM D4541-09 test method, bond performance of high-toughness resin and epoxy asphalt concrete was determined through the pull-off test at room temperature of 23°C and high temperature of 70°C at a drawing rate of 0.7 MPa/s. The test results are presented in Table2. At room temperature of 23°C, the fracture surface in the pull-off test was found at the interface of sealing materials and the mixture, and bond strength of high-toughness resin was 14.65 MPa. When temperature rose to 70°C, the fracture surface was located in the interior of EAM. The fracture surface in the pull-off test is demonstrated in Figure 2. This indicated that there was a strong bond capacity between high-toughness resin and epoxy asphalt concrete.Table 2
Bond strength of high-toughness resin with epoxy asphalt concrete.
Test temperature (°C)
Pull-off strength (MPa)
Fracture surface
23
14.65
Interface between resin and mixture
70
1.56
Interior of the mixtureFigure 2
Fracture interface in pull-off test (70°C).The utilized fiber cloth included basalt, glass, and carbon in total. The basalt fiber cloth was manufactured by Jiangsu Tianlong Co. Ltd., China, and represented with BF, while glass fiber cloth was produced by Jiangsu Zhongyitong Company, China, and expressed as GF. Moreover, the carbon fiber cloth was from Zhejiang Haining Company, China, expressed as CF. Performance parameters at room temperature of fiber are presented in Table3.Table 3
Requirements of technical indexes of fiber cloth.
Fiber
Weight (g/m2)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Tensile elastic modulus (MPa)
Elongation (%)
CF
300
≥3400
≥2.4 × 105
≥1.6
GF
450
≥1500
≥0.72 × 105
≥2.8
BF
300
≥2200
≥1.04 × 105
≥1.6


### 2.2. Finite Element Simulation

By using the finite element software ABAQUS, mechanics simulation was performed on steel bridge deck pavement with fiber-reinforced epoxy resin-modified asphalt (Figure3). By referring to boundary parameters and the worst load position in literatures [9, 10], the influences of changes of modulus of different fiber-reinforced thin resin layers on mechanical response of the original pavement structure were analyzed. The moduli were 3,000, 5,000, 7,000, 9,000, 11,000, 13,000, 15,000, 17,000, 19,000, and 21,000 MPa. Load was standard axle loading of 100 kN on a single axle with dual tires, and tire pressure was 0.7 MPa. Model parameters are shown in Table 4.Figure 3
Structural model of steel bridge deck pavement.Table 4
Model parameters in finite element simulation.
Structural layer
Length (m) (Z)
Width (m) (X)
Thickness (m) (Y)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Thin overlay
11.25
6
0.005
—
0.25
Original pavement layer
11.25
6
0.055
2000
0.25
Steel bridge deck
3.75 × 3
6
0.014
210000
0.3
Transverse diaphragm plate
0.01
6
0.84
210000
0.3
U-shaped rib
11.25
0.006
0.28
210000
0.3The maximum transverse tensile stressσ and strain ε were selected as indexes of mechanical analysis. The calculation results are displayed in Figure 4. With the increase of modulus of the thin overlay, the maximum tensile stress and strain of the original epoxy asphalt pavement surface significantly decrease. When modulus of the thin overlay increases to 21,000 MPa, the maximum tensile stress and strain of the original pavement reduce by about 66.2% and 64.3%, respectively, in comparison with the pavement without thin overlay. As modulus of the thin overlay rises, the maximum tensile stress of the thin overlay itself remarkably increases, while the maximum tensile strain significantly decreases. When the modulus of the thin overlay increases from 3,000 to 21,000 MPa, the maximum tensile stress of the thin overlay rises about 212.6% while the maximum tensile strain reduces about 53.7%.Figure 4
Change laws of the maximum tensile stress and strain of the pavement layer with modulus of the thin overlay.
(a)
(b)


### 2.3. Specimen Preparation and Experimental Methods

By referring to the EN 12697-33-2007 method of specimens prepared by roller compactor, a rutting plate of the EAM was molded. After molding, the plate was placed in an oven to be cured for 4 h at 120°C. After taking it out and cooling to room temperature, the surface of the plate was manually uniformly coated with high-toughness resin by using a brush with coating weight of 0.5 kg/m2, and fiber cloth was immediately laid at the same time. After that, high-toughness resin was smeared on the surface of the fiber cloth again with coating weight of 0.5 kg/m2, so as to ensure that the fiber cloth was fully infiltrated in the resin layer. The processes of specimen preparation are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Specimen preparation of fiber-reinforced resin composite overlay: (a) blade coating resin on the bottom; (b) laying fiber cloth; (c) brush coating resin on the surface; (d) curing.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)After being cured for 16 h at 23°C, the test plate was cut into prismatic beam specimens with dimensions of 240 ± 2 mm × 30 ± 2 mm × 35 ± 2 mm by using a rock cutting machine. After that, by referring to EN 12697-24-2018, the bending test was conducted on the specimens of the fiber cloth-reinforced epoxy resin-modified asphalt mixture by using the three-point beam (3 PB) bending test. The test schematic is shown in Figure6. By placing one side of fiber resin cloth on the bottom, the maximum bending strength, the maximum fracture strain, and bending stiffness modulus were measured. The test was carried out at room temperature (15°C) and low temperature (−10°C) at loading rate of 50 mm/min.Figure 6
Tensile and bending test of the fiber overlay.At present, there are still no specific test methods for evaluating the fatigue resistance of overlay of the fiber-reinforced thin resin. Considering this, the research designed a fatigue test on plates under cyclic loading based on the rutting test, to assess the fatigue resistance of the plate. The test schematic is shown in Figure7.Figure 7
Schematic diagram of fatigue test on plates based on rutting.The test plates were prepared in the following steps, and the processes of specimen preparation are shown in Figure8.(1)
A rutting plate of epoxy asphalt concrete measuring 30 cm long, 30 cm wide, and 2.5 cm thick was molded at first. Then, by using a stone cutting machine, the plate was cut into three plates with the dimensions of 30 cm × 10 cm × 2.5 cm (length × width × thickness), which were then halved to two plates measuring 30 cm long, 5 cm wide, and 2.5 cm thick.(2)
RPF high-toughness epoxy resin was used to bond the halved specimens into a test plate with the dimensions of 30 cm × 10 cm × 2.5 cm (length × width × thickness), which was then put in the oven to be cured at 60°C for 16 h.(3)
High-toughness resin was uniformly coated on the surface of the test plate, on which different types of fiber cloth were immediately laid. Then, high-toughness resin was smeared on the surface of the fiber cloth again after the fiber cloth was fully infiltrated in the bottom resin layer and interlaminar bubbles were removed. Then, the plate was placed in the oven to be cured for 16 h at 60°C again.(4)
After putting the cured plate in the rutting test box for 5 h, metallic supports were placed under two sides of the plate to lift the plate by 20 cm. Then, the fatigue test under wheel rolling was conducted. The loading wheel rolled back and forth along the direction perpendicular to the joint of the plate at the speed of 42 times per minute at 60 and 75°C. The wheel load used was 0.7 ± 0.05 MPa. The processes of fatigue test are shown in Figure9.Figure 8
Preparation process of the test plate for the fatigue test. (a) Bonding using the high-toughness resin. (b) Smearing the high-toughness resin. (c) Laying CF cloth.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Fatigue test on the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 2.1. Experimental Materials

This study used the Bv epoxy asphalt mixture (EAM), which was produced by ChemCo Systems Company in the United States and composed of component A (liquid bisphenol A epoxy resin) and component B (homogeneous compositions comprising petroleum asphalt and curing agent) with the ratio of 100: 518. Special aggregates for steel bridge deck pavement produced by Jiangsu Maodi Group Co., Ltd. and mineral powder manufactured from limestone in Jurong county, Jiangsu province, China, were utilized. The proportion of mineral aggregates, i.e., 1# aggregate (with diameter of 10∼13 mm), 2# aggregate (with diameter of 5∼10 mm), 3# aggregate (with diameter of 3∼5 mm), 4# aggregate (with diameter of 1∼3 mm), 5# aggregate (with diameter of 0.075∼1 mm), and mineral powder was 2.5%: 22.5%: 21.5%: 22%: 23%: 8.5%. Controlling the resultant gradation according to the median of the gradation range, the results are shown in Table1. The asphalt-aggregate ratio was 6.5%.Table 1
The aggregate gradation used in this study.
Mesh (mm)
Mass percentage of aggregates passing through meshes (square mesh, mm) (%)
13.2
9.5
4.75
2.36
0.6
0.075
Grading requirements
100
95∼100
65∼85
50∼70
28∼40
7∼14
Resultant gradation
100.0
99.7
75.2
59.3
34.5
11.0
Median of gradation
100.0
97.5
75.0
60.0
34.0
10.5The used RPF high-toughness epoxy resin was provided by Jiangsu SinoRoad Transportation Science and Technology Co., Ltd., China, and comprised component A (polyurethane-modified epoxy resin) and component B (fatty amine curing agent) with the ratio of 4 : 1. By referring to the ASTM D638-2014 test method, the tensile strength and elongation of high-toughness resin were measured through tensile test. The tensile strength, elongation at fracture, and tensile elastic modulus were 25.2 MPa, 63.2%, and about 40 MPa, respectively, tested at 23 ± 1°C and a stretching rate of 50 mm/min.In reference to the ASTM D4541-09 test method, bond performance of high-toughness resin and epoxy asphalt concrete was determined through the pull-off test at room temperature of 23°C and high temperature of 70°C at a drawing rate of 0.7 MPa/s. The test results are presented in Table2. At room temperature of 23°C, the fracture surface in the pull-off test was found at the interface of sealing materials and the mixture, and bond strength of high-toughness resin was 14.65 MPa. When temperature rose to 70°C, the fracture surface was located in the interior of EAM. The fracture surface in the pull-off test is demonstrated in Figure 2. This indicated that there was a strong bond capacity between high-toughness resin and epoxy asphalt concrete.Table 2
Bond strength of high-toughness resin with epoxy asphalt concrete.
Test temperature (°C)
Pull-off strength (MPa)
Fracture surface
23
14.65
Interface between resin and mixture
70
1.56
Interior of the mixtureFigure 2
Fracture interface in pull-off test (70°C).The utilized fiber cloth included basalt, glass, and carbon in total. The basalt fiber cloth was manufactured by Jiangsu Tianlong Co. Ltd., China, and represented with BF, while glass fiber cloth was produced by Jiangsu Zhongyitong Company, China, and expressed as GF. Moreover, the carbon fiber cloth was from Zhejiang Haining Company, China, expressed as CF. Performance parameters at room temperature of fiber are presented in Table3.Table 3
Requirements of technical indexes of fiber cloth.
Fiber
Weight (g/m2)
Tensile strength (MPa)
Tensile elastic modulus (MPa)
Elongation (%)
CF
300
≥3400
≥2.4 × 105
≥1.6
GF
450
≥1500
≥0.72 × 105
≥2.8
BF
300
≥2200
≥1.04 × 105
≥1.6


## 2.2. Finite Element Simulation

By using the finite element software ABAQUS, mechanics simulation was performed on steel bridge deck pavement with fiber-reinforced epoxy resin-modified asphalt (Figure3). By referring to boundary parameters and the worst load position in literatures [9, 10], the influences of changes of modulus of different fiber-reinforced thin resin layers on mechanical response of the original pavement structure were analyzed. The moduli were 3,000, 5,000, 7,000, 9,000, 11,000, 13,000, 15,000, 17,000, 19,000, and 21,000 MPa. Load was standard axle loading of 100 kN on a single axle with dual tires, and tire pressure was 0.7 MPa. Model parameters are shown in Table 4.Figure 3
Structural model of steel bridge deck pavement.Table 4
Model parameters in finite element simulation.
Structural layer
Length (m) (Z)
Width (m) (X)
Thickness (m) (Y)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Thin overlay
11.25
6
0.005
—
0.25
Original pavement layer
11.25
6
0.055
2000
0.25
Steel bridge deck
3.75 × 3
6
0.014
210000
0.3
Transverse diaphragm plate
0.01
6
0.84
210000
0.3
U-shaped rib
11.25
0.006
0.28
210000
0.3The maximum transverse tensile stressσ and strain ε were selected as indexes of mechanical analysis. The calculation results are displayed in Figure 4. With the increase of modulus of the thin overlay, the maximum tensile stress and strain of the original epoxy asphalt pavement surface significantly decrease. When modulus of the thin overlay increases to 21,000 MPa, the maximum tensile stress and strain of the original pavement reduce by about 66.2% and 64.3%, respectively, in comparison with the pavement without thin overlay. As modulus of the thin overlay rises, the maximum tensile stress of the thin overlay itself remarkably increases, while the maximum tensile strain significantly decreases. When the modulus of the thin overlay increases from 3,000 to 21,000 MPa, the maximum tensile stress of the thin overlay rises about 212.6% while the maximum tensile strain reduces about 53.7%.Figure 4
Change laws of the maximum tensile stress and strain of the pavement layer with modulus of the thin overlay.
(a)
(b)


## 2.3. Specimen Preparation and Experimental Methods

By referring to the EN 12697-33-2007 method of specimens prepared by roller compactor, a rutting plate of the EAM was molded. After molding, the plate was placed in an oven to be cured for 4 h at 120°C. After taking it out and cooling to room temperature, the surface of the plate was manually uniformly coated with high-toughness resin by using a brush with coating weight of 0.5 kg/m2, and fiber cloth was immediately laid at the same time. After that, high-toughness resin was smeared on the surface of the fiber cloth again with coating weight of 0.5 kg/m2, so as to ensure that the fiber cloth was fully infiltrated in the resin layer. The processes of specimen preparation are shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Specimen preparation of fiber-reinforced resin composite overlay: (a) blade coating resin on the bottom; (b) laying fiber cloth; (c) brush coating resin on the surface; (d) curing.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)After being cured for 16 h at 23°C, the test plate was cut into prismatic beam specimens with dimensions of 240 ± 2 mm × 30 ± 2 mm × 35 ± 2 mm by using a rock cutting machine. After that, by referring to EN 12697-24-2018, the bending test was conducted on the specimens of the fiber cloth-reinforced epoxy resin-modified asphalt mixture by using the three-point beam (3 PB) bending test. The test schematic is shown in Figure6. By placing one side of fiber resin cloth on the bottom, the maximum bending strength, the maximum fracture strain, and bending stiffness modulus were measured. The test was carried out at room temperature (15°C) and low temperature (−10°C) at loading rate of 50 mm/min.Figure 6
Tensile and bending test of the fiber overlay.At present, there are still no specific test methods for evaluating the fatigue resistance of overlay of the fiber-reinforced thin resin. Considering this, the research designed a fatigue test on plates under cyclic loading based on the rutting test, to assess the fatigue resistance of the plate. The test schematic is shown in Figure7.Figure 7
Schematic diagram of fatigue test on plates based on rutting.The test plates were prepared in the following steps, and the processes of specimen preparation are shown in Figure8.(1)
A rutting plate of epoxy asphalt concrete measuring 30 cm long, 30 cm wide, and 2.5 cm thick was molded at first. Then, by using a stone cutting machine, the plate was cut into three plates with the dimensions of 30 cm × 10 cm × 2.5 cm (length × width × thickness), which were then halved to two plates measuring 30 cm long, 5 cm wide, and 2.5 cm thick.(2)
RPF high-toughness epoxy resin was used to bond the halved specimens into a test plate with the dimensions of 30 cm × 10 cm × 2.5 cm (length × width × thickness), which was then put in the oven to be cured at 60°C for 16 h.(3)
High-toughness resin was uniformly coated on the surface of the test plate, on which different types of fiber cloth were immediately laid. Then, high-toughness resin was smeared on the surface of the fiber cloth again after the fiber cloth was fully infiltrated in the bottom resin layer and interlaminar bubbles were removed. Then, the plate was placed in the oven to be cured for 16 h at 60°C again.(4)
After putting the cured plate in the rutting test box for 5 h, metallic supports were placed under two sides of the plate to lift the plate by 20 cm. Then, the fatigue test under wheel rolling was conducted. The loading wheel rolled back and forth along the direction perpendicular to the joint of the plate at the speed of 42 times per minute at 60 and 75°C. The wheel load used was 0.7 ± 0.05 MPa. The processes of fatigue test are shown in Figure9.Figure 8
Preparation process of the test plate for the fatigue test. (a) Bonding using the high-toughness resin. (b) Smearing the high-toughness resin. (c) Laying CF cloth.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Fatigue test on the plate.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Theoretical Measurement

Based on the classical theory of fiber composites, it is considered that the single-layer fiber cloth in the fiber-reinforced resin composites studied in this research is continuously and uniformly arranged in the resin matrix and is firmly bonded to the resin matrix. It is assumed that fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites have the same tensile strain. Under vertical loading force, the resin matrix completely transfers tensile forceF to fiber through the interface, and the simplified model is displayed in Figure 10.Figure 10
Simplified model of unidirectional continuous composites.
(a)
(b)
(c)According to the balance of forces, the following formulas are obtained:(1)F=Ff+Fm=σf⋅Af+σm⋅Am,Ac=Af+Am,Vf=AfAc,Vm=AfAc,Vf+Vm=1,where Af, Am, and Ac represent the cross-sectional areas of fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites, respectively; Vf and Vm indicate the volume fractions of fiber and resin matrix, respectively. Moreover, σf and σm denote the forces applied on fiber and resin matrix, so the average tensile stress on fiber cloth-reinforced composites is shown as follows:(2)σcL=FAc=σf⋅Af+σm⋅AAc=σf⋅Vf+σm⋅Vm.In the fiber cloth-reinforced thin resin overlay, the matrix is resin. When fiber cloth and resin matrix are within the range of elastic deformation, the following formula is obtained in accordance with Hooke’s law:(3)σf=Ef⋅εf,σm=Em⋅εm,σcL=EcL⋅εcL,where εf, εm, and εcL indicate the longitudinal strains of fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites, respectively; Ef, Em, and EcL represent the elastic moduli of fiber, resin matrix, and composites, respectively. Based on the isostrain assumption εf = εm = εcL, the expression of longitudinal elastic modulus of unidirectional continuous fiber-reinforced composites, that is, the rule of the mixture is demonstrated as follows:(4)EcL=Ef⋅Vf+Em⋅Vm=Ef⋅Vf+Em⋅1−Vf.Elastic moduli of CF, BF, and GF are 230, 104, and 72 GPa, respectively, and modulus of the resin matrix is 0.04 GPa. According to formula (4), the relationship between modulus of fiber-reinforced resin composites and fiber content can be obtained as shown in Figure 11. In the experiment, resin content is 1 kg/m2, and weight of fiber is demonstrated in Table 3. In accordance with the ratio of weights of fiber to resin, CF and BF contents are 30% and GF content is 45%. Furthermore, through theoretical calculation, moduli of CF-, BF-, and GF-reinforced resin composites are 69.03, 31.23, and 32.42 GPa, respectively.Figure 11
Moduli and fiber contents of unidirectional continuous composites.Based on formulas (3) and (4), the following formula is obtained:(5)σcL=Ef⋅εf⋅Vf+Em⋅εm⋅1−Vf.The ratio of load of fiber to resin matrix is presented as follows:(6)FfFm=Ef⋅εf⋅VfEm⋅εm⋅1−Vf=Ef⋅VfEm⋅1−Vf.In accordance with formula (6), when volume content Vf of fiber is certain, the larger the ratio of Ef/Em, the more the load the fiber bears and the stronger the reinforcing effects are. In theory, because tensile elastic modulus (Table 1) of CF is higher than those of GF and BF, the effects of CF in improving bending and tensile resistance of the composite resin overlay and overall structure of the mixture are the best.Similarly,Em′, Ef′, and EcL′ represent the elastic moduli of the matrix of EAM, fiber, and composite structure, respectively; Vm′ and Vf′ indicate the volume fractions of the matrix of EAM and fiber, respectively. Based on bending test of the mixture, tensile elastic modulus of the matrix of EAM in the linear elastic stage is 1,063 MPa, and theoretical moduli of CF-, BF-, and GF-reinforced resin composites are 69,030, 31,230, and 32,420 MPa, respectively. In accordance with formula (4), theoretical values of tensile elastic moduli of the fiber-reinforced composite structure are shown in Table 5.Table 5
Tensile elastic moduli of the composite structure through theoretical calculation at room temperature.
No.
Material
Tensile elastic modulus (MPa)
1
EAM beam
1063
2
CF-reinforced beam
4733
3
BF-reinforced beam
2692
4
GF-reinforced beam
2756


### 3.2. Evaluation of Cracking Resistance

#### 3.2.1. Test at Room Temperature

The bending test results at room temperature are shown in Figure12. The bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) is 7.29 MPa at room temperature of 15°C, and the maximum bending strain and bending stiffness in failure are 10,876 με and 670 MPa, respectively. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness of the EAM are improved to some extent. At room temperature of 15°C, the reinforcement amplitude of CF is the highest and bending strength and the maximum bending strain can be improved to 99.62 MPa and 50,393 με. Moreover, bending stiffness in failure can be increased to 1,778 MPa. The reinforcement amplitudes of GF and BF are basically the same and their bending strengths are 41.2 and 42.7 MPa. Furthermore, the maximum bending strains are 28,760 and 32,458 με and bending stiffness in failure is 1,435 and 1,308 MPa, respectively.Figure 12
Bending test results at room temperature: (a) bending strength at 15°C; (b) the maximum bending strain at 15°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure at 15°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)As shown in Figure13, at room temperature of 15°C, with constant increase of load, bending deflections of the beams linearly rise and shows a good linear elastic trend. The CF-reinforced beam has the highest bending stiffness, followed by GF- and BF-reinforced ones, which all show the typical brittle failure. This law well corresponds to tensile strength and modulus of fiber materials, that is, the higher the tensile strength and elastic modulus of fiber materials for reinforcement, the better the reinforcing effects.Figure 13
Load-deflection curves at 15°C.Failure and fracture of the specimens at room temperature of 15°C are shown in Figure14. The EAM beam (blank specimen), GF-reinforced beam, and BF-reinforced beam all show fracture failure of normal section. The specimen of CF-reinforced beam presents obvious failure phenomenon that the CF-reinforced resin and the epoxy asphalt beam are separated at the bond interface. This indicates that strength and tensile elastic modulus of the CF-reinforced resin composite are much larger than those of the EAM beam, and displacements of them under the same load are inconsistent. With the increase of bending and tensile load, relative slippage occurs on the interface of the CF-reinforced beam, finally resulting in delaminating failure.Figure 14
Fracturing behaviors of beam specimens of resin composite overlay reinforced with different fibers at 15°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


#### 3.2.2. Test at Low Temperature

The bending test results at low temperature of −10°C are shown in Figure15; in comparison with the room temperature of 15°C, bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) increases to 15.98 MPa with the decrease of temperature. Moreover, the maximum bending strain reduces to 5,865 με and bending stiffness in failure rises to 2,724 MPa. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength and the maximum bending strain of EAM increase to some extent.Figure 15
Bending test results at low temperature. (a) Bending and tensile strength at −10°C; (b) the maximum bending and tensile strain at −10°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus at −10°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)At low temperature of −10°C, reinforcing effects of CF are optimal. Bending strength and the maximum bending strain of the CF-reinforced beam are 56.17 MPa and 18,149με, respectively, and bending stiffness in failure is 2,724 MPa. For the BF-reinforced beam, bending strength and the maximum bending strain are 31.09 MPa and 8,607 με, and bending stiffness in failure is 3,612 MPa. In addition, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness in failure of the GF-reinforced beam are 45.73 MPa, 24,677 με, and 1,853 MPa, respectively.As shown in Figure16, at low temperature of −10°C, as load constantly rises, bending deflections of the beams linearly increase at first. The typical brittle failure is still found on the EAM beam (blank specimen). After fiber reinforcement, when load rises to a certain degree, there is a certain yield phenomenon in the late stage, gradually changing from the initial elastic deformation to plastic deformation until the mixture is finally fractured.Figure 16
Load-deflection curves at −10°C.The reason for yield phenomenon at low temperature is generally that shear failure is likely to appear to the materials under bending and tensile forces. The fracture surface of the specimens at low temperature of −10°C is further verified, as shown in Figure17. The EAM beam (blank specimen) still shows brittle fracture failure. For CF-, GF-, and BF-reinforced beams, the fracture surface shows an angle of 45° with load, indicating that tensile strength of the normal section of the materials is very high owing to modulus of fiber largely increasing at low temperature. With the rise of bending and tensile load, shear stress of the oblique section of the materials exceeds the maximum strength, so essentially the materials show shear failure.Figure 17
Fracturing behaviors of the beam specimens of resin composite overlays reinforced with different fibers at −10°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


#### 3.2.3. Comparison of Room-Temperature and Low-Temperature Performances

By analyzing results of different specimens at room temperature and low temperature as shown in Figure18, the following conclusions are made:(1)
With the reduction of temperature, obvious brittle phenomenon is found on the EAM beam (blank specimen) and bending stiffness in failure rises from 670 to 2,724 MPa, with increase amplitude of 300%. Bending strength increases from 7.29 to 15.98 MPa, while the maximum bending strain decreases from 10,876 to 5,865με.(2)
Change of performances of the organic CF-reinforced beam is sensitive to temperature, and bending stiffness in failure increases by 74% compared with that at room temperature. Bending strength reduces by 44% from 99.62 to 56.17 MPa and the maximum bending strain decreases to 18,149με with amplitude of 64%.(3)
In comparison with room temperature, bending stiffness of the BF-reinforced beam increases by 176%, while bending strength decreases by 26%. Furthermore, the maximum bending strain reduces by 73% from 32,458 to 8,607με.(4)
For inorganic nonmetal GF-reinforced beam, the change of performance is least sensitive. Bending stiffness rises by 29% compared with that at room temperature, while bending strength increases from 41.27 to 45.73 MPa, with amplitude of 10%. In addition, bending strain reduces by 14% from 28,670 to 24,677με.Figure 18
Room-temperature and low-temperature performances: (a) bending strength; (b) the maximum failure strain; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 3.3. Evaluation of Fatigue Performance

The results of fatigue tests on the plates are shown in Table6. Considering that modulus of materials always decreases and cracking resistance of structures declines at high temperatures, the research focuses on testing of fatigue and cracking resistance of the plate at high temperatures. The results of fatigue tests on the plates are consistent with those of static bending tests. The results reveal that(1)
The EAM beam (blank specimen) is fractured immediately after loading at high temperature of 60°C, while BF-, GF-, and CF-reinforced beams are not damaged, even no cracking appearing at the joints.(2)
As the temperature rises to 75°C, fractures still occur to the EAM beam immediately after loading; the GF-reinforced beam is fractured after loading for 1 h; the BF-reinforced beam presents certain bending after loading for 1 h; while no cracking occurs to the CF-reinforced beam. The fatigue cracking behaviors of the specimens are shown in Figure19.Table 6
Fatigue test results of composite structures under wheel rolling at 60 and 75°C.
Fiber type
Temperature (°C)
Test time (h)
Result
EAM beam
60
—
Fracture failure immediately after loading
75
—
Fracture failure immediately after loading
BF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
1
No fracture and obvious bending at the midspan
GF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
1
Cracking of the mixture
CF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
2
No fractureFigure 19
Fatigue cracking behaviors of the specimens of resin composite overlays reinforced with different fibers at 75°C. (a) Blank. (b) BF-reinforced beam. (c) GF-reinforced beam. (d) CF-reinforced beam.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.1. Theoretical Measurement

Based on the classical theory of fiber composites, it is considered that the single-layer fiber cloth in the fiber-reinforced resin composites studied in this research is continuously and uniformly arranged in the resin matrix and is firmly bonded to the resin matrix. It is assumed that fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites have the same tensile strain. Under vertical loading force, the resin matrix completely transfers tensile forceF to fiber through the interface, and the simplified model is displayed in Figure 10.Figure 10
Simplified model of unidirectional continuous composites.
(a)
(b)
(c)According to the balance of forces, the following formulas are obtained:(1)F=Ff+Fm=σf⋅Af+σm⋅Am,Ac=Af+Am,Vf=AfAc,Vm=AfAc,Vf+Vm=1,where Af, Am, and Ac represent the cross-sectional areas of fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites, respectively; Vf and Vm indicate the volume fractions of fiber and resin matrix, respectively. Moreover, σf and σm denote the forces applied on fiber and resin matrix, so the average tensile stress on fiber cloth-reinforced composites is shown as follows:(2)σcL=FAc=σf⋅Af+σm⋅AAc=σf⋅Vf+σm⋅Vm.In the fiber cloth-reinforced thin resin overlay, the matrix is resin. When fiber cloth and resin matrix are within the range of elastic deformation, the following formula is obtained in accordance with Hooke’s law:(3)σf=Ef⋅εf,σm=Em⋅εm,σcL=EcL⋅εcL,where εf, εm, and εcL indicate the longitudinal strains of fiber, resin matrix, and fiber cloth-reinforced resin composites, respectively; Ef, Em, and EcL represent the elastic moduli of fiber, resin matrix, and composites, respectively. Based on the isostrain assumption εf = εm = εcL, the expression of longitudinal elastic modulus of unidirectional continuous fiber-reinforced composites, that is, the rule of the mixture is demonstrated as follows:(4)EcL=Ef⋅Vf+Em⋅Vm=Ef⋅Vf+Em⋅1−Vf.Elastic moduli of CF, BF, and GF are 230, 104, and 72 GPa, respectively, and modulus of the resin matrix is 0.04 GPa. According to formula (4), the relationship between modulus of fiber-reinforced resin composites and fiber content can be obtained as shown in Figure 11. In the experiment, resin content is 1 kg/m2, and weight of fiber is demonstrated in Table 3. In accordance with the ratio of weights of fiber to resin, CF and BF contents are 30% and GF content is 45%. Furthermore, through theoretical calculation, moduli of CF-, BF-, and GF-reinforced resin composites are 69.03, 31.23, and 32.42 GPa, respectively.Figure 11
Moduli and fiber contents of unidirectional continuous composites.Based on formulas (3) and (4), the following formula is obtained:(5)σcL=Ef⋅εf⋅Vf+Em⋅εm⋅1−Vf.The ratio of load of fiber to resin matrix is presented as follows:(6)FfFm=Ef⋅εf⋅VfEm⋅εm⋅1−Vf=Ef⋅VfEm⋅1−Vf.In accordance with formula (6), when volume content Vf of fiber is certain, the larger the ratio of Ef/Em, the more the load the fiber bears and the stronger the reinforcing effects are. In theory, because tensile elastic modulus (Table 1) of CF is higher than those of GF and BF, the effects of CF in improving bending and tensile resistance of the composite resin overlay and overall structure of the mixture are the best.Similarly,Em′, Ef′, and EcL′ represent the elastic moduli of the matrix of EAM, fiber, and composite structure, respectively; Vm′ and Vf′ indicate the volume fractions of the matrix of EAM and fiber, respectively. Based on bending test of the mixture, tensile elastic modulus of the matrix of EAM in the linear elastic stage is 1,063 MPa, and theoretical moduli of CF-, BF-, and GF-reinforced resin composites are 69,030, 31,230, and 32,420 MPa, respectively. In accordance with formula (4), theoretical values of tensile elastic moduli of the fiber-reinforced composite structure are shown in Table 5.Table 5
Tensile elastic moduli of the composite structure through theoretical calculation at room temperature.
No.
Material
Tensile elastic modulus (MPa)
1
EAM beam
1063
2
CF-reinforced beam
4733
3
BF-reinforced beam
2692
4
GF-reinforced beam
2756


## 3.2. Evaluation of Cracking Resistance

### 3.2.1. Test at Room Temperature

The bending test results at room temperature are shown in Figure12. The bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) is 7.29 MPa at room temperature of 15°C, and the maximum bending strain and bending stiffness in failure are 10,876 με and 670 MPa, respectively. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness of the EAM are improved to some extent. At room temperature of 15°C, the reinforcement amplitude of CF is the highest and bending strength and the maximum bending strain can be improved to 99.62 MPa and 50,393 με. Moreover, bending stiffness in failure can be increased to 1,778 MPa. The reinforcement amplitudes of GF and BF are basically the same and their bending strengths are 41.2 and 42.7 MPa. Furthermore, the maximum bending strains are 28,760 and 32,458 με and bending stiffness in failure is 1,435 and 1,308 MPa, respectively.Figure 12
Bending test results at room temperature: (a) bending strength at 15°C; (b) the maximum bending strain at 15°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure at 15°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)As shown in Figure13, at room temperature of 15°C, with constant increase of load, bending deflections of the beams linearly rise and shows a good linear elastic trend. The CF-reinforced beam has the highest bending stiffness, followed by GF- and BF-reinforced ones, which all show the typical brittle failure. This law well corresponds to tensile strength and modulus of fiber materials, that is, the higher the tensile strength and elastic modulus of fiber materials for reinforcement, the better the reinforcing effects.Figure 13
Load-deflection curves at 15°C.Failure and fracture of the specimens at room temperature of 15°C are shown in Figure14. The EAM beam (blank specimen), GF-reinforced beam, and BF-reinforced beam all show fracture failure of normal section. The specimen of CF-reinforced beam presents obvious failure phenomenon that the CF-reinforced resin and the epoxy asphalt beam are separated at the bond interface. This indicates that strength and tensile elastic modulus of the CF-reinforced resin composite are much larger than those of the EAM beam, and displacements of them under the same load are inconsistent. With the increase of bending and tensile load, relative slippage occurs on the interface of the CF-reinforced beam, finally resulting in delaminating failure.Figure 14
Fracturing behaviors of beam specimens of resin composite overlay reinforced with different fibers at 15°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2.2. Test at Low Temperature

The bending test results at low temperature of −10°C are shown in Figure15; in comparison with the room temperature of 15°C, bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) increases to 15.98 MPa with the decrease of temperature. Moreover, the maximum bending strain reduces to 5,865 με and bending stiffness in failure rises to 2,724 MPa. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength and the maximum bending strain of EAM increase to some extent.Figure 15
Bending test results at low temperature. (a) Bending and tensile strength at −10°C; (b) the maximum bending and tensile strain at −10°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus at −10°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)At low temperature of −10°C, reinforcing effects of CF are optimal. Bending strength and the maximum bending strain of the CF-reinforced beam are 56.17 MPa and 18,149με, respectively, and bending stiffness in failure is 2,724 MPa. For the BF-reinforced beam, bending strength and the maximum bending strain are 31.09 MPa and 8,607 με, and bending stiffness in failure is 3,612 MPa. In addition, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness in failure of the GF-reinforced beam are 45.73 MPa, 24,677 με, and 1,853 MPa, respectively.As shown in Figure16, at low temperature of −10°C, as load constantly rises, bending deflections of the beams linearly increase at first. The typical brittle failure is still found on the EAM beam (blank specimen). After fiber reinforcement, when load rises to a certain degree, there is a certain yield phenomenon in the late stage, gradually changing from the initial elastic deformation to plastic deformation until the mixture is finally fractured.Figure 16
Load-deflection curves at −10°C.The reason for yield phenomenon at low temperature is generally that shear failure is likely to appear to the materials under bending and tensile forces. The fracture surface of the specimens at low temperature of −10°C is further verified, as shown in Figure17. The EAM beam (blank specimen) still shows brittle fracture failure. For CF-, GF-, and BF-reinforced beams, the fracture surface shows an angle of 45° with load, indicating that tensile strength of the normal section of the materials is very high owing to modulus of fiber largely increasing at low temperature. With the rise of bending and tensile load, shear stress of the oblique section of the materials exceeds the maximum strength, so essentially the materials show shear failure.Figure 17
Fracturing behaviors of the beam specimens of resin composite overlays reinforced with different fibers at −10°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


### 3.2.3. Comparison of Room-Temperature and Low-Temperature Performances

By analyzing results of different specimens at room temperature and low temperature as shown in Figure18, the following conclusions are made:(1)
With the reduction of temperature, obvious brittle phenomenon is found on the EAM beam (blank specimen) and bending stiffness in failure rises from 670 to 2,724 MPa, with increase amplitude of 300%. Bending strength increases from 7.29 to 15.98 MPa, while the maximum bending strain decreases from 10,876 to 5,865με.(2)
Change of performances of the organic CF-reinforced beam is sensitive to temperature, and bending stiffness in failure increases by 74% compared with that at room temperature. Bending strength reduces by 44% from 99.62 to 56.17 MPa and the maximum bending strain decreases to 18,149με with amplitude of 64%.(3)
In comparison with room temperature, bending stiffness of the BF-reinforced beam increases by 176%, while bending strength decreases by 26%. Furthermore, the maximum bending strain reduces by 73% from 32,458 to 8,607με.(4)
For inorganic nonmetal GF-reinforced beam, the change of performance is least sensitive. Bending stiffness rises by 29% compared with that at room temperature, while bending strength increases from 41.27 to 45.73 MPa, with amplitude of 10%. In addition, bending strain reduces by 14% from 28,670 to 24,677με.Figure 18
Room-temperature and low-temperature performances: (a) bending strength; (b) the maximum failure strain; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.2.1. Test at Room Temperature

The bending test results at room temperature are shown in Figure12. The bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) is 7.29 MPa at room temperature of 15°C, and the maximum bending strain and bending stiffness in failure are 10,876 με and 670 MPa, respectively. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness of the EAM are improved to some extent. At room temperature of 15°C, the reinforcement amplitude of CF is the highest and bending strength and the maximum bending strain can be improved to 99.62 MPa and 50,393 με. Moreover, bending stiffness in failure can be increased to 1,778 MPa. The reinforcement amplitudes of GF and BF are basically the same and their bending strengths are 41.2 and 42.7 MPa. Furthermore, the maximum bending strains are 28,760 and 32,458 με and bending stiffness in failure is 1,435 and 1,308 MPa, respectively.Figure 12
Bending test results at room temperature: (a) bending strength at 15°C; (b) the maximum bending strain at 15°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure at 15°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)As shown in Figure13, at room temperature of 15°C, with constant increase of load, bending deflections of the beams linearly rise and shows a good linear elastic trend. The CF-reinforced beam has the highest bending stiffness, followed by GF- and BF-reinforced ones, which all show the typical brittle failure. This law well corresponds to tensile strength and modulus of fiber materials, that is, the higher the tensile strength and elastic modulus of fiber materials for reinforcement, the better the reinforcing effects.Figure 13
Load-deflection curves at 15°C.Failure and fracture of the specimens at room temperature of 15°C are shown in Figure14. The EAM beam (blank specimen), GF-reinforced beam, and BF-reinforced beam all show fracture failure of normal section. The specimen of CF-reinforced beam presents obvious failure phenomenon that the CF-reinforced resin and the epoxy asphalt beam are separated at the bond interface. This indicates that strength and tensile elastic modulus of the CF-reinforced resin composite are much larger than those of the EAM beam, and displacements of them under the same load are inconsistent. With the increase of bending and tensile load, relative slippage occurs on the interface of the CF-reinforced beam, finally resulting in delaminating failure.Figure 14
Fracturing behaviors of beam specimens of resin composite overlay reinforced with different fibers at 15°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2.2. Test at Low Temperature

The bending test results at low temperature of −10°C are shown in Figure15; in comparison with the room temperature of 15°C, bending strength of the EAM beam (blank specimen) increases to 15.98 MPa with the decrease of temperature. Moreover, the maximum bending strain reduces to 5,865 με and bending stiffness in failure rises to 2,724 MPa. After fiber reinforcement, bending strength and the maximum bending strain of EAM increase to some extent.Figure 15
Bending test results at low temperature. (a) Bending and tensile strength at −10°C; (b) the maximum bending and tensile strain at −10°C; (c) bending stiffness modulus at −10°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)At low temperature of −10°C, reinforcing effects of CF are optimal. Bending strength and the maximum bending strain of the CF-reinforced beam are 56.17 MPa and 18,149με, respectively, and bending stiffness in failure is 2,724 MPa. For the BF-reinforced beam, bending strength and the maximum bending strain are 31.09 MPa and 8,607 με, and bending stiffness in failure is 3,612 MPa. In addition, bending strength, maximum bending strain, and bending stiffness in failure of the GF-reinforced beam are 45.73 MPa, 24,677 με, and 1,853 MPa, respectively.As shown in Figure16, at low temperature of −10°C, as load constantly rises, bending deflections of the beams linearly increase at first. The typical brittle failure is still found on the EAM beam (blank specimen). After fiber reinforcement, when load rises to a certain degree, there is a certain yield phenomenon in the late stage, gradually changing from the initial elastic deformation to plastic deformation until the mixture is finally fractured.Figure 16
Load-deflection curves at −10°C.The reason for yield phenomenon at low temperature is generally that shear failure is likely to appear to the materials under bending and tensile forces. The fracture surface of the specimens at low temperature of −10°C is further verified, as shown in Figure17. The EAM beam (blank specimen) still shows brittle fracture failure. For CF-, GF-, and BF-reinforced beams, the fracture surface shows an angle of 45° with load, indicating that tensile strength of the normal section of the materials is very high owing to modulus of fiber largely increasing at low temperature. With the rise of bending and tensile load, shear stress of the oblique section of the materials exceeds the maximum strength, so essentially the materials show shear failure.Figure 17
Fracturing behaviors of the beam specimens of resin composite overlays reinforced with different fibers at −10°C. (a) Blank. (b) CF. (c) GF. (d) BF.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 3.2.3. Comparison of Room-Temperature and Low-Temperature Performances

By analyzing results of different specimens at room temperature and low temperature as shown in Figure18, the following conclusions are made:(1)
With the reduction of temperature, obvious brittle phenomenon is found on the EAM beam (blank specimen) and bending stiffness in failure rises from 670 to 2,724 MPa, with increase amplitude of 300%. Bending strength increases from 7.29 to 15.98 MPa, while the maximum bending strain decreases from 10,876 to 5,865με.(2)
Change of performances of the organic CF-reinforced beam is sensitive to temperature, and bending stiffness in failure increases by 74% compared with that at room temperature. Bending strength reduces by 44% from 99.62 to 56.17 MPa and the maximum bending strain decreases to 18,149με with amplitude of 64%.(3)
In comparison with room temperature, bending stiffness of the BF-reinforced beam increases by 176%, while bending strength decreases by 26%. Furthermore, the maximum bending strain reduces by 73% from 32,458 to 8,607με.(4)
For inorganic nonmetal GF-reinforced beam, the change of performance is least sensitive. Bending stiffness rises by 29% compared with that at room temperature, while bending strength increases from 41.27 to 45.73 MPa, with amplitude of 10%. In addition, bending strain reduces by 14% from 28,670 to 24,677με.Figure 18
Room-temperature and low-temperature performances: (a) bending strength; (b) the maximum failure strain; (c) bending stiffness modulus in failure.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 3.3. Evaluation of Fatigue Performance

The results of fatigue tests on the plates are shown in Table6. Considering that modulus of materials always decreases and cracking resistance of structures declines at high temperatures, the research focuses on testing of fatigue and cracking resistance of the plate at high temperatures. The results of fatigue tests on the plates are consistent with those of static bending tests. The results reveal that(1)
The EAM beam (blank specimen) is fractured immediately after loading at high temperature of 60°C, while BF-, GF-, and CF-reinforced beams are not damaged, even no cracking appearing at the joints.(2)
As the temperature rises to 75°C, fractures still occur to the EAM beam immediately after loading; the GF-reinforced beam is fractured after loading for 1 h; the BF-reinforced beam presents certain bending after loading for 1 h; while no cracking occurs to the CF-reinforced beam. The fatigue cracking behaviors of the specimens are shown in Figure19.Table 6
Fatigue test results of composite structures under wheel rolling at 60 and 75°C.
Fiber type
Temperature (°C)
Test time (h)
Result
EAM beam
60
—
Fracture failure immediately after loading
75
—
Fracture failure immediately after loading
BF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
1
No fracture and obvious bending at the midspan
GF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
1
Cracking of the mixture
CF-reinforced beam
60
2
No fracture
75
2
No fractureFigure 19
Fatigue cracking behaviors of the specimens of resin composite overlays reinforced with different fibers at 75°C. (a) Blank. (b) BF-reinforced beam. (c) GF-reinforced beam. (d) CF-reinforced beam.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)


## 4. Application and Effect

The research results have been applied in the pavement and maintenance projects of a series of steel bridge decks, including Zhenjiang–Yangzhou Yangtze River Bridge, the third Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge, and Suzhou–Nantong Bridge, which are shown in Figures20 and 21. Double-layer epoxy asphalt of 5.5 cm thick was paved on these steel bridge decks. The construction technologies of the thin overlays mainly involve sandblasting and shot blasting of the original pavement (to enhance the interfacial bonding), smearing of resin, and laying of CF cloth. In addition, to improve the skid resistance, basalt gravels with grain size of 3∼5 mm need to be spread on the surface of resin. The structure depth can be as thick as 1.2 mm and the frictional coefficient exceeds 60 BPN. The structural design of the application scheme is displayed in Figure 22. The research results have been applied to the bridges for at least 5 years and still present favorable effects.Figure 20
Construction technology of the thin overlay of fiber-reinforced resin on the Suzhou–Nantong Bridge.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 21
Effects of construction. (a) Zhenjiang–Yangzhou Yangtze River Bridge (2014). (b) The third Nanjing Yangtze River Bridge. (c) Suzhou–Nantong Bridge.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 22
Structure of the thin overlay of fiber-reinforced resin.


## 5. Conclusion

Through beam bending test, this study mainly investigated change laws of bending and tensile performances of epoxy asphalt concrete after fiber reinforcement and analyzed bending strength and the maximum failure strain of the beams at different temperatures. Moreover, reinforcing effects of different fibers were discussed. The main conclusions are made as follows:(1)
After fiber reinforcement, bending strength, maximum failure strain, and stiffness modulus of the EAM beam are improved, which is favorable for cracking resistance in pavement. It provides a theoretical basis manifesting the engineering application value of the thin overlay of fiber-reinforced resin.(2)
As temperature decreases, the bending and failure mode of fiber-reinforced EAM changes from brittle fracture into shear failure, accompanied with significant yield phenomenon. The result suggests that the thin overlay of fiber-reinforced resin is able to change the brittle failure of the original EAM pavement to yield failure, which makes most of the performance of the pavement materials and exerts practical significance for prolonging the service life.(3)
By comparing results of CF, GF, and BF, it is found that organic fiber is sensitive to influences of temperature, while GF is least sensitive to temperature.(4)
By performing fatigue tests on plates, it is found that compared with the original EAM pavement, the CF-reinforced specimen improved the fatigue and cracking resistance at the greatest extent, particularly showing favorable effects at high temperatures.(5)
To enhance the application value in engineering, a thin overlay structure of CF-reinforced resin and gravel is designed. It can improve fatigue performance and skid resistance of the pavement. The earliest application of the design has been in service for 8 years, still showing favorable effects.



---

*Source: 9840502-2019-12-18.xml*