# Reinforcement Effects of Isolation Piles on the Adjacent Existing Tunnel in Building Construction

Authors: Aijun Yao; Jian Lu; Yanfei Guo; Jiantao Zhang; Haifeng Guo
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Similar material model test and numerical simulation method were used to study the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the existing shield tunnel structure in the adjacent building construction for analyzing foundation pit excavation and new building construction approaching existing shield tunnel engineering. The numerical simulation orthogonal experiment was used to optimize four isolation pile parameters. The conclusions were obtained as follows: (1) Isolation piles could share horizontal load of the soil at the rear side of the support structure and reduce horizontal displacement of the soil. As a result, maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor after foundation pit excavation and building loading were decreased. The horizontal displacement and torsional deformation of the tunnel structure toward the direction of the foundation pit were controlled, and the increase in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure was also restrained. (2) At the elevation above the tunnel roof, the increase in burial depth of the isolation pile top slightly affected the reinforcement effect on the tunnel structure. The increase in burial depth of the isolation pile bottom could improve the reinforcement effect. Thus, burial depth of the isolation pile bottom should be properly increased in the engineering practice. The reduction in pile spacing could improve the reinforcement effect. Accordingly, pile spacing should be properly selected in the engineering practice. With the increase of diameter of the isolation pile, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles increased obviously. (3) Pile diameter had the greatest influence on the reinforcement effect of isolation piles, followed by burial depth of the pile bottom, pile spacing, and burial depth of the pile top. Orthogonal experiments indicated the following optimal parameter values: a pile diameter of 1.2 m, a burial depth of the pile bottom of 2H, a pile spacing of 1.6 m, and a burial depth of the pile top of 0.75Z.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Urban rail transit construction drives economic development along metro lines while relieving ground traffic jams. Several commercial, public, and residential construction projects are adjacent to shield tunnels in service. Foundation pit excavation and building construction adjacent to the existing shield tunnel will break through the original stress state of the subway tunnel and the soil. A series of complicated unloading-loading processes form due to foundation pit excavation and follow-up building construction, which can exert an important influence on the tunnel structure. Thus, scholars have studied deformation laws of the adjacent tunnel structure in the foundation pit excavation and corresponding control measures.Deformation and internal force of the tunnel structure are usually theoretically calculated using various methods, such as the Pasternak foundation model, semiempirical method, semianalytical method, singular function method, and Galerkin method [1–5].As for numerical simulation, scholars have analyzed influences of foundation pit excavation adjacent to the existing tunnel under 2D and 3D conditions and acquired tunnel structure deformation laws [6–12].Ng et al. [13] conducted three-dimensional centrifuge tests to study the influence of foundation pit excavation on the existing tunnel and acquired influence degrees of different factors in the excavation process through the analysis of model test results.Control measures of existing tunnel structure deformation in the adjacent foundation pit excavation include reduction in the influence caused by the construction process on the existing tunnel structure from the source, such as optimizing foundation pit excavation measures and taking foundation pit reinforcement measures to protect the tunnel structure [14–18]. In addition, isolation piles and walls can be constructed in the soil adjacent to the tunnel to reduce soil deformation around the tunnel and protect the tunnel structure. Zheng et al. [19] analyzed the working effect of isolation piles and thus acquired the relationships of working performance of isolation piles with pile spacing and length. Other scholars [20, 21] explored the influences of factors such as pile length and diameter on the reinforcement effect of the pile and provided further reference for design and construction of isolation piles.Existing studies have investigated deformation laws of the adjacent tunnel structure due to foundation pit excavation and control measures. However, few of these works have paid attention to the reinforcement mechanism of isolation piles for the existing tunnel structure under unloading-loading effects of the building construction. Therefore, the reinforcement mechanism and effect of isolation piles on the existing tunnel structure under foundation pit excavation and building loading were studied using the similar material model test and numerical simulation methods. The transverse internal forces and deformation laws of the tunnel structure were obtained. A group of orthogonal experiments based on numerical simulation were carried out to simulate foundation pit excavation and building construction adjacent to the existing tunnel under different isolation piles and influencing factors for providing a certain reference for the selection of the reinforcement scheme.


## 2. Reinforcement Mechanism of Isolation Piles and Influencing Factors in Foundation Pit Excavation

In foundation pit excavation, the supporting structure will generate horizontal displacement deformation toward the foundation pit under active earth pressure at the rear side. Consequently, soil outside the foundation pit will generate the extrusion effect on the adjacent tunnel, and the tunnel structure will experience horizontal displacement toward the foundation pit. The internal forces of the tunnel structure also change under the extruding effect of the soil, which affects the safety of the tunnel structure. Therefore, reduction in horizontal displacement of the soil at the rear side of the supporting structure is a major research topic.The isolation pile reinforcement method has been applied to actual engineering to reduce horizontal displacement deformation of the soil at the rear side of the supporting structure in foundation pit excavation. In this process, the soil at the rear side of isolation piles extrudes pile bodies. A horizontal miniature pressure arch is formed between isolation piles. Thus, soil pressure transfers to the isolation piles, and the soil pressure acting upon the supporting structure decreases. The effects of reduction in soil horizontal displacement and protection of the existing tunnel structure are ultimately realized.Through engineering application and further development, existing isolation piles are divided into various layouts, such as double-row, single-row, and root piles [22]. The planar layout of isolation piles can be in different forms, such as linear, microarched, and broken line.The reinforcement effect of isolation piles is influenced by various factors, such as pile length, pile rigidity, and pile spacing. Therefore, linearly arranged single-row isolation piles were used in this study to analyze the influences of burial depth of the isolation pile bottom, pile spacing, burial depth of the pile top, and pile diameter on the reinforcement effect on the existing tunnel structure.


## 3. Similar Material Model Test

### 3.1. Prototype Engineering and Test Scheme

A building construction project adjacent to the subway tunnel in Beijing is located in Chaoyang District, and the west side of the project is close to the subway tunnel in service. The tunnel is constructed using the shield method, and its outer edge is 5.10 m away from the west side of the basement in this project. The outer diameter of the shield tunnel is 6.0 m, the lining segment thickness is 300 mm, the material is C50 prefabricated concrete, and the segment ring width is 1.2 m. The excavation depth of the foundation pit is 15.0 m. The combined support pattern of “composite soil nailing wall + diaphragm wall + prestressed anchor cable” is adopted for the foundation pit excavation. Table1 presents the physical and mechanical parameters of the soil at the engineering site.Table 1
Physical and mechanical parameters of the soil.
Stratum name
Thickness (m)
Compression modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Unit weight (kN/m³)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Internal friction angle (°)
Miscellaneous fill
2.0
7.0
0.36
18.5
10
15
Clayey silt I
5.2
7.7
0.25
21.6
21
20.7
Silty clay
13.2
9.7
0.26
20.7
28.7
20.6
Clayey silt II
1.8
18.7
0.25
20.7
30
23
Medium sand
3.2
30.0
0.27
21.0
0
30
Pebbles
—
55.0
0.23
22.0
0
35In this study, the similar material model test of the reinforcement effect of isolation piles under actual construction conditions was carried out. The model test was divided into two engineering situations: with and without isolation pile reinforcement. The isolation piles were divided into two forms, namely, conventional- and buried-type isolation piles [19], depending on the difference in burial depth of the pile top. To study the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under the influence of different factors, four groups of the similar material model test were carried out with different values of burial depth of the pile top and pile spacing, as shown in Table 2 (Z is the burial depth of the tunnel axis and D is the diameter of the isolation pile).Table 2
Similar material model test schemes.
Scheme number
Isolation pile form
Burial depth of the pile top
Pile spacing
Total load of the foundation pit (kN)
0
Without piles
—
—
8.4
1
Conventional type
0
2D
8.4
2
Buried type
0.4Z
2D
8.4
3
Buried type
0.4Z
3D
8.4


### 3.2. Determination of Similarity Coefficients

The dimensions of prototype engineering and model box were considered comprehensively following the similitude principle. To avoid the influence of boundary conditions on the test [23, 24] and satisfy the measurement accuracy simultaneously, the similarity coefficient of 15 : 1 was determined as the prototype model in this model test, and the geometric similarity coefficient N = 15.


### 3.3. Model Box and Strata Simulation

The model box had a size of 3 m × 1 m × 2 m, and the model box is composed of seventeen standard components, four stiffening ribs, and three strengthened ring beams. The size of each standard component is 1 m × 1 m, which is made of a steel frame and organic glass. The model box is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Model test box.The strata were simulated by a similar material. The similar material was prepared using four materials, namely, river sand, iron powder, gypsum, and lime. River sand and iron powder were aggregates, and gypsum and lime were adhesives. Table3 shows the similar material composition and matching ratio. Table 4 shows the parameters of prototype and model strata.Table 3
Similar material composition and matching ratio of strata.
Stratum name
Prototype stratum thickness (m)
Model stratum thickness (cm)
Composition and ratio
Miscellaneous fill
2.0
13
River sand = 1
Clayey silt I
5.2
35
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 2
Silty clay
13.2
88
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 1
Clayey silt II
1.8
12
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 2
Medium sand
3.2
22
River sand = 1
Pebbles
4.5
30
Iron powder : river sand = 1 : 20Table 4
Parameters of prototype and model strata.
Stratum name
Cohesion (kPa)
Internal friction angle (°)
Poisson’s ratio
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Miscellaneous fill
10.00
0.67
15.00
1.00
0.36
0.36
Clayey silt I
21.00
1.40
20.70
1.38
0.25
0.25
Silty clay
28.70
1.91
20.60
1.37
0.26
0.26
Clayey silt II
30.00
2.00
23.00
1.53
0.25
0.25
Medium sand
0.00
0.00
30.00
2.00
0.27
0.27
Pebbles
0.00
0.00
35.00
2.33
0.23
0.23


### 3.4. Simulation of Foundation Pit Supporting Structure and Measurement Scheme

The foundation pit supporting scheme in the model test was the same as that in prototype engineering, and the combined supporting scheme of “slope excavation + diaphragm wall + prestressed anchor cable” was adopted. The tunnel structure and diaphragm wall were simulated by an organic glass cylinder and plate, respectively, and the geometric similarity ratio was 15 : 1. The inner and outer diameters of the tunnel model were 360 and 400 mm, respectively. The thickness, height, and length of the diaphragm wall were 50, 1,000, and 980 mm, respectively. Isolation piles were fabricated using gypsum and iron wire, and the diameter was 54 mm. The tunnel structure, diaphragm wall, and isolation piles were preburied in the soil before the foundation pit construction. The anchor cable was prepared using quick-setting cement and steel strand. The steel strand was preburied in the soil before the foundation pit excavation. The anchored section of the anchor cable was simulated by prepouring quick-setting cement in the process of filling strata materials. During the foundation pit construction, when the foundation pit was excavated below the elevation of the anchor cable, prestressing force was applied using a spring scale to stretch the steel strand, and screws were tightened when the spring scale reached the prestressing force value. Figure2 shows the excavation of the foundation pit during the test.Figure 2
Excavation of the foundation pit during the model test.During the model test, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure was monitored, and the monitoring equipment was a guyed displacement sensor with a precision of 0.01 mm and a measuring range of 0–100 mm. Displacement data were collected through the acquisition box. The displacement sensor is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Guyed displacement sensor.Figures4–6 show the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in four schemes.Figure 4
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in scheme 0.Figure 5
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in scheme 1.Figure 6
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in schemes 2 and 3.


### 3.5. Construction Process in the Model Test

The model test was divided into three phases: phase I involved strata material filling and arrangement of the supporting structure, tunnel structure, and isolation piles; phase II involved foundation pit excavation and simulation of foundation pit excavation through stratified soil excavation. When the foundation pit was excavated below the elevation of the anchor cable, the anchor cable is tensioned; phase III involved building construction loading, during which the loading was simulated through stratified laying of cast iron weights on the foundation slab (800 mm (length) × 800 mm (width)). Given that the prototype building had 10 aboveground stories and 4 underground stories, the load of each story was 12 kPa. The weight of each cast iron was 10 kg, and each layer was stacked with 12 weights to simulate the loading process of a two-story construction. The loading process was carried out 7 times with the load of 1.2 kN each time. Table5 shows the procedures of the model test. Figure 7 shows the diagram of procedure 20.Table 5
Procedures of the model test.
Procedure number
Procedure instructions
1
Initial state (construction of the diaphragm wall, isolation piles, anchor cable, and shield tunnel and reading initial values)
2
Soil excavation to −133 mm depth
3
Construction of sloping and the first-layer anchor cable
4
Soil excavation to −266 mm depth
5
Soil excavation to −400 mm depth
6
Construction of the second-layer anchor cable
7
Soil excavation to −533 mm depth
8
Soil excavation to −667 mm depth
9
Construction of the third-layer anchor cable
10
Soil excavation to −800 mm depth
11
Soil excavation to −933 mm depth
12
Soil excavation to −1000 mm depth
13
Waiting for 24 h after completion of excavation
14
Loading foundation slab and weights of 1.2 kN
15
Loading weights of 2.4 kN
16
Loading weights of 3.6 kN
17
Loading weights of 4.8 kN
18
Loading weights of 6.0 kN
19
Loading weights of 7.2 kN
20
Loading weights of 8.4 kNFigure 7
Diagram of procedure 20.


### 3.6. Analysis of Model Test Results

Horizontal displacement data of the tunnel structure in each procedure of the model test were recorded. Positive horizontal displacement represents the movement of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit. Figure8 shows the model test results.Figure 8
Horizontal displacement curve of the tunnel structure.As shown in Figure8, deformation laws of the tunnel structure in four schemes were similar. As the foundation pit excavation progressed, the soil at the rear side of the diaphragm wall experienced deformation toward the foundation pit under the effect of active soil pressure. The tunnel structure was extruded to generate displacement toward the foundation pit, and the displacement reached the maximum value after foundation pit excavation was completed. Because the model box stood still for 24 hours to simulate the intermittent time before building loading, the displacement of soil and tunnel continued to increase during the intermittent time. Therefore, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure continued to increase after the foundation pit excavation was completed. In the simulation of building construction loading, the tunnel structure experienced minor displacement toward outside of the foundation pit. Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure slightly recovered. Thereafter, the tunnel structure went through displacement toward the foundation pit, but the displacement changed slightly.Comparison of four curves in Figure8 indicated that horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 0 was greater than those in the other three schemes. This finding indicated that the addition of isolation piles had limiting effect on the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure. When the burial depths of the pile top and bottom were identical in schemes 2 and 3, the reinforcement effect under 2D pile spacing was better than that under 3D pile spacing. Therefore, reduction in pile spacing in practice engineering could improve the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. When the burial depth of the pile bottom and pile spacing were identical in schemes 1 and 2, the difference in the reinforcement effect between conventional- and buried-type isolation piles was small. This result indicated that the buried depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect of isolation piles.


## 3.1. Prototype Engineering and Test Scheme

A building construction project adjacent to the subway tunnel in Beijing is located in Chaoyang District, and the west side of the project is close to the subway tunnel in service. The tunnel is constructed using the shield method, and its outer edge is 5.10 m away from the west side of the basement in this project. The outer diameter of the shield tunnel is 6.0 m, the lining segment thickness is 300 mm, the material is C50 prefabricated concrete, and the segment ring width is 1.2 m. The excavation depth of the foundation pit is 15.0 m. The combined support pattern of “composite soil nailing wall + diaphragm wall + prestressed anchor cable” is adopted for the foundation pit excavation. Table1 presents the physical and mechanical parameters of the soil at the engineering site.Table 1
Physical and mechanical parameters of the soil.
Stratum name
Thickness (m)
Compression modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Unit weight (kN/m³)
Cohesion (kN/m2)
Internal friction angle (°)
Miscellaneous fill
2.0
7.0
0.36
18.5
10
15
Clayey silt I
5.2
7.7
0.25
21.6
21
20.7
Silty clay
13.2
9.7
0.26
20.7
28.7
20.6
Clayey silt II
1.8
18.7
0.25
20.7
30
23
Medium sand
3.2
30.0
0.27
21.0
0
30
Pebbles
—
55.0
0.23
22.0
0
35In this study, the similar material model test of the reinforcement effect of isolation piles under actual construction conditions was carried out. The model test was divided into two engineering situations: with and without isolation pile reinforcement. The isolation piles were divided into two forms, namely, conventional- and buried-type isolation piles [19], depending on the difference in burial depth of the pile top. To study the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under the influence of different factors, four groups of the similar material model test were carried out with different values of burial depth of the pile top and pile spacing, as shown in Table 2 (Z is the burial depth of the tunnel axis and D is the diameter of the isolation pile).Table 2
Similar material model test schemes.
Scheme number
Isolation pile form
Burial depth of the pile top
Pile spacing
Total load of the foundation pit (kN)
0
Without piles
—
—
8.4
1
Conventional type
0
2D
8.4
2
Buried type
0.4Z
2D
8.4
3
Buried type
0.4Z
3D
8.4


## 3.2. Determination of Similarity Coefficients

The dimensions of prototype engineering and model box were considered comprehensively following the similitude principle. To avoid the influence of boundary conditions on the test [23, 24] and satisfy the measurement accuracy simultaneously, the similarity coefficient of 15 : 1 was determined as the prototype model in this model test, and the geometric similarity coefficient N = 15.


## 3.3. Model Box and Strata Simulation

The model box had a size of 3 m × 1 m × 2 m, and the model box is composed of seventeen standard components, four stiffening ribs, and three strengthened ring beams. The size of each standard component is 1 m × 1 m, which is made of a steel frame and organic glass. The model box is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Model test box.The strata were simulated by a similar material. The similar material was prepared using four materials, namely, river sand, iron powder, gypsum, and lime. River sand and iron powder were aggregates, and gypsum and lime were adhesives. Table3 shows the similar material composition and matching ratio. Table 4 shows the parameters of prototype and model strata.Table 3
Similar material composition and matching ratio of strata.
Stratum name
Prototype stratum thickness (m)
Model stratum thickness (cm)
Composition and ratio
Miscellaneous fill
2.0
13
River sand = 1
Clayey silt I
5.2
35
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 2
Silty clay
13.2
88
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 1
Clayey silt II
1.8
12
River sand : iron powder : gypsum : lime = 19 : 8 : 1 : 2
Medium sand
3.2
22
River sand = 1
Pebbles
4.5
30
Iron powder : river sand = 1 : 20Table 4
Parameters of prototype and model strata.
Stratum name
Cohesion (kPa)
Internal friction angle (°)
Poisson’s ratio
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Prototype stratum
Model stratum
Miscellaneous fill
10.00
0.67
15.00
1.00
0.36
0.36
Clayey silt I
21.00
1.40
20.70
1.38
0.25
0.25
Silty clay
28.70
1.91
20.60
1.37
0.26
0.26
Clayey silt II
30.00
2.00
23.00
1.53
0.25
0.25
Medium sand
0.00
0.00
30.00
2.00
0.27
0.27
Pebbles
0.00
0.00
35.00
2.33
0.23
0.23


## 3.4. Simulation of Foundation Pit Supporting Structure and Measurement Scheme

The foundation pit supporting scheme in the model test was the same as that in prototype engineering, and the combined supporting scheme of “slope excavation + diaphragm wall + prestressed anchor cable” was adopted. The tunnel structure and diaphragm wall were simulated by an organic glass cylinder and plate, respectively, and the geometric similarity ratio was 15 : 1. The inner and outer diameters of the tunnel model were 360 and 400 mm, respectively. The thickness, height, and length of the diaphragm wall were 50, 1,000, and 980 mm, respectively. Isolation piles were fabricated using gypsum and iron wire, and the diameter was 54 mm. The tunnel structure, diaphragm wall, and isolation piles were preburied in the soil before the foundation pit construction. The anchor cable was prepared using quick-setting cement and steel strand. The steel strand was preburied in the soil before the foundation pit excavation. The anchored section of the anchor cable was simulated by prepouring quick-setting cement in the process of filling strata materials. During the foundation pit construction, when the foundation pit was excavated below the elevation of the anchor cable, prestressing force was applied using a spring scale to stretch the steel strand, and screws were tightened when the spring scale reached the prestressing force value. Figure2 shows the excavation of the foundation pit during the test.Figure 2
Excavation of the foundation pit during the model test.During the model test, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure was monitored, and the monitoring equipment was a guyed displacement sensor with a precision of 0.01 mm and a measuring range of 0–100 mm. Displacement data were collected through the acquisition box. The displacement sensor is shown in Figure3.Figure 3
Guyed displacement sensor.Figures4–6 show the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in four schemes.Figure 4
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in scheme 0.Figure 5
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in scheme 1.Figure 6
Layout of the support structure and sensor arrangement mode in schemes 2 and 3.


## 3.5. Construction Process in the Model Test

The model test was divided into three phases: phase I involved strata material filling and arrangement of the supporting structure, tunnel structure, and isolation piles; phase II involved foundation pit excavation and simulation of foundation pit excavation through stratified soil excavation. When the foundation pit was excavated below the elevation of the anchor cable, the anchor cable is tensioned; phase III involved building construction loading, during which the loading was simulated through stratified laying of cast iron weights on the foundation slab (800 mm (length) × 800 mm (width)). Given that the prototype building had 10 aboveground stories and 4 underground stories, the load of each story was 12 kPa. The weight of each cast iron was 10 kg, and each layer was stacked with 12 weights to simulate the loading process of a two-story construction. The loading process was carried out 7 times with the load of 1.2 kN each time. Table5 shows the procedures of the model test. Figure 7 shows the diagram of procedure 20.Table 5
Procedures of the model test.
Procedure number
Procedure instructions
1
Initial state (construction of the diaphragm wall, isolation piles, anchor cable, and shield tunnel and reading initial values)
2
Soil excavation to −133 mm depth
3
Construction of sloping and the first-layer anchor cable
4
Soil excavation to −266 mm depth
5
Soil excavation to −400 mm depth
6
Construction of the second-layer anchor cable
7
Soil excavation to −533 mm depth
8
Soil excavation to −667 mm depth
9
Construction of the third-layer anchor cable
10
Soil excavation to −800 mm depth
11
Soil excavation to −933 mm depth
12
Soil excavation to −1000 mm depth
13
Waiting for 24 h after completion of excavation
14
Loading foundation slab and weights of 1.2 kN
15
Loading weights of 2.4 kN
16
Loading weights of 3.6 kN
17
Loading weights of 4.8 kN
18
Loading weights of 6.0 kN
19
Loading weights of 7.2 kN
20
Loading weights of 8.4 kNFigure 7
Diagram of procedure 20.


## 3.6. Analysis of Model Test Results

Horizontal displacement data of the tunnel structure in each procedure of the model test were recorded. Positive horizontal displacement represents the movement of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit. Figure8 shows the model test results.Figure 8
Horizontal displacement curve of the tunnel structure.As shown in Figure8, deformation laws of the tunnel structure in four schemes were similar. As the foundation pit excavation progressed, the soil at the rear side of the diaphragm wall experienced deformation toward the foundation pit under the effect of active soil pressure. The tunnel structure was extruded to generate displacement toward the foundation pit, and the displacement reached the maximum value after foundation pit excavation was completed. Because the model box stood still for 24 hours to simulate the intermittent time before building loading, the displacement of soil and tunnel continued to increase during the intermittent time. Therefore, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure continued to increase after the foundation pit excavation was completed. In the simulation of building construction loading, the tunnel structure experienced minor displacement toward outside of the foundation pit. Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure slightly recovered. Thereafter, the tunnel structure went through displacement toward the foundation pit, but the displacement changed slightly.Comparison of four curves in Figure8 indicated that horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 0 was greater than those in the other three schemes. This finding indicated that the addition of isolation piles had limiting effect on the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure. When the burial depths of the pile top and bottom were identical in schemes 2 and 3, the reinforcement effect under 2D pile spacing was better than that under 3D pile spacing. Therefore, reduction in pile spacing in practice engineering could improve the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. When the burial depth of the pile bottom and pile spacing were identical in schemes 1 and 2, the difference in the reinforcement effect between conventional- and buried-type isolation piles was small. This result indicated that the buried depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect of isolation piles.


## 4. Numerical Simulation Analysis

Numerical calculation software midas GTS NX was used to simulate prototype engineering construction for further studying the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the existing shield tunnel in the adjacent building construction process. The scheme of numerical calculation was the same as that of the similar material model test.


### 4.1. Establishment of Numerical Simulation Model

To avoid the influence of the boundary effect on the numerical simulation, the soil thickness outside the foundation pit was more than tripled foundation pit excavation depth. The length, width, and height were 90, 60, and 60 m, respectively. Figure9 shows the mesh of the numerical calculation model, and Figure 10 presents the mesh of isolation piles and supporting structure.Figure 9
Mesh of the numerical calculation model.Figure 10
Mesh of isolation piles and supporting structure.


### 4.2. Model Parameter Values

Hardened soil model could take into account the nonlinear characteristics of stress and strain of soil and could also reflect the complex stress path of soil during excavation of the foundation pit [25]. The modified Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model in midas GTS NX took into account the hardening characteristics of soil, which could better simulate the stress-strain behavior of soil during excavation of the foundation pit. Accordingly, the modified Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model was used in this study. In accordance with the suggested values of the midas GTS NX help file, unloading modulus took tripled loading modulus, and solid units were used to establish the soil. Table 1 presents the physical and mechanical parameters of the soil.Elastic constitutive models were used for the diaphragm wall, foundation slab, anchor cable, isolation piles, and tunnel structure. The diaphragm wall, tunnel structure, and foundation slab were simulated using plate units. The isolation piles were simulated using solid units. The anchor cable was simulated using implanted-type truss units. Table6 shows the physical and mechanical parameters of the structure.Table 6
Physical and mechanical parameters of the structure.
Structure name
Unit weight (kN/m³)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Diaphragm wall
25
31500
0.20
Anchor cable
78
210000
0.25
Foundation slab
25
31500
0.20
Isolation pile
25
30000
0.20
Lining segment
25
34500
0.20


### 4.3. Numerical Simulation Procedures

The procedures of numerical simulation were similar to those of the model test. The number of numerical simulation procedures was 20 (Table7).Table 7
Numerical simulation procedures.
Procedure number
Procedure instructions
1
Initial stress state: displacement clearing
2
Construction of the shield tunnel, isolation piles, and diaphragm wall and displacement clearing
3
Soil excavation to −2.0 m depth
4
Construction of the first-layer anchor cable
5
Soil excavation to −4.0 m depth
6
Soil excavation to −6.0 m depth
7
Construction of the second-layer anchor cable
8
Soil excavation to −8.0 m depth
9
Soil excavation to −10.0 m depth
10
Construction of the third-layer anchor cable
11
Soil excavation to −12.0 m depth
12
Soil excavation to −14.0 m depth
13
Soil excavation to −15.0 m depth
14
Construction of basements of −4 and −3 stories
15
Construction of basements of −2 and −1 stories
16
Loading of the weights for the first and second stories
17
Loading of the weights for the third and fourth stories
18
Loading of the weights for the fifth and sixth stories
19
Loading of the weights for the seventh and eighth stories
20
Loading of the weights for the ninth and tenth stories


### 4.4. Result Analysis

#### 4.4.1. Horizontal Displacement Analysis of Tunnel Structure

Figure11 shows the measuring point arrangement of the tunnel structure displacement for analyzing the tunnel structure displacement in the numerical simulation calculation results. Positive horizontal displacement represents the movement of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit.Figure 11
Layout of monitoring points for horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.(1) Tunnel Structure Displacement without Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in the building construction process without isolation pile reinforcement was calculated. Figure 12 shows the results.Figure 12
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure without isolation pile reinforcement.Figure12 shows that, without isolation pile reinforcement, the tunnel structure experienced horizontal displacement toward the foundation pit during excavation. When the foundation pit excavation was shallow, the difference in horizontal displacement between four measuring points was small. As the excavation depth increased, the horizontal deformations of the diaphragm wall and soil above the pit bottom were greater than those below the pit bottom. Consequently, the horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 was larger than that at monitoring point 3, and the difference gradually increased. The tunnel structure experienced torsional deformation toward the foundation pit. As the foundation pit excavation deepened, the torsional deformation became serious. After the foundation pit excavation was completed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure reached the maximum value. The tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement of 9.17 mm. The difference in displacement between the roof and the floor was 2.94 mm.In the building loading process, the increase in load extruded the soil at the bottom of the foundation pit. As a result, the diaphragm wall below the foundation pit bottom experienced deformation toward outside of the foundation pit. The tunnel structure went through minor displacement far from the foundation pit under the extruding effect of the soil. The horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure generated during the excavation unloading process recovered to a certain degree. Measuring point 3 at the bottom of the tunnel had the maximum displacement variation of −0.87 mm. The final difference in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor was 3.31 mm.(2) Tunnel Structure Displacement with Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Figures 13–15 show the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement in various schemes.Figure 13
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 1.Figure 14
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 2.Figure 15
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 3.As shown in Figures13–15, displacement laws of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement were similar to those under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. As the foundation pit excavation progressed, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure became serious. Monitoring point 1 at the tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement, whereas monitoring point 3 at the tunnel structure floor had the minimum horizontal displacement. The difference in horizontal displacement between monitoring points 4 and 2 of the tunnel structure was small, and the tunnel structure did not experience horizontal expansion deformation. As the building loading progressed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure slightly recovered.The tunnel structure displacement laws in numerical simulation were generally similar to those in the model test. The curve inflection point appeared after excavation of the foundation pit, and the calculation model was reasonable.In the building loading stage, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure increased slightly in the model test. The reason was that the building loading process in the model test was simulated by stratified laying of cast iron weights at the bottom of the foundation pit. Given the existence of gap between cast iron weights and the diaphragm wall, the diaphragm wall above the excavation surface and the neighboring soil would slightly move toward the foundation pit during the subsequent loading process. Under the comprehensive influence, the tunnel structure also produced slight displacement toward the foundation pit, but the displacement increment was slight. The horizontal displacement laws of the tunnel structure obtained by the two research methods were approximately identical, and the total displacement had little difference. The backfilling of the gap between the building and the diaphragm wall in numerical simulation restricted the horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall toward the foundation pit, which agreed well with engineering practice.Figure12 shows that horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 was slightly smaller than that at monitoring point 4, and the tunnel structure experienced outward expansion deformation in the horizontal direction. As shown in Figures 13–15, horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 overlapped with that at measuring point 4. Therefore, the difference in horizontal displacement between the left and right sides of the tunnel structure could be decreased, and the horizontal expansion deformation of the tunnel structure could be decreased by isolation pile reinforcement. Table 8 shows the tunnel structure deformation values.Table 8
Deformation values of the tunnel structure.
Scheme number
Maximum horizontal displacement (mm)
W after foundation pit excavation (mm)
W after building loading (mm)
0
9.17
2.94
3.31
1
6.53
2.19
2.32
2
6.61
2.23
2.38
3
6.80
2.36
2.50
W is the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor.As shown in Table8, the building loading process would increase the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor. As a result, the torsional deformation degree of the tunnel structure further elevated. During building construction in the engineering practice, tunnel structure monitoring should be enhanced and shear failure of the tunnel structure and connecting bolt caused by large torsional deformation of the tunnel structure should be prevented. Compared with the condition without isolation pile reinforcement, maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor were decreased under the condition with isolation pile reinforcement. Isolation pile reinforcement could reduce horizontal displacement and torsional deformation of the existing tunnel structure. Comparison of the deformation values of the tunnel structure in schemes 1 and 2 showed that the increase in burial depth of the pile top inconsiderably influenced the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. The reason was that isolation piles reduced deformations of the tunnel structure through joint stress bearing of the part embedded below the displacement-affected area of pit excavation and the part within a certain range above the existing tunnel axis elevation. Comparison of schemes 2 and 3 indicated that, after spacing of isolation piles was increased, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the structure roof and the floor slightly increased. Consequently, the tunnel structure torsion slightly increased. The increase in pile spacing would reduce the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. Thus, proper pile spacing should be selected in the layout plan of isolation piles.


#### 4.4.2. The Internal Force Analysis of Transverse Tunnel Structure

Eight locations on the tunnel structure are selected as monitoring points. The additional internal force of the transverse tunnel structure indicates internal force in any procedure minus initial internal force. Figure16 shows the internal force monitoring points of the transverse tunnel structure, and the angle between each measuring point is 45°. The positive value of normal force indicates that the section is stretched. The positive value of bending moment implies that the inside of the tunnel structure is stretched and the outside of the tunnel structure is compressed. The positive value of shear force suggests that the microsection of the tunnel structure turns clockwise.Figure 16
Layout of monitoring points for internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure.(1) Analysis of Additional Axis Force. Figure 17 shows the normal force of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 18 and 19.Figure 17
Normal forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 18
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 19
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the building loading.As shown in Figure17, the normal force at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 had a slight difference after the foundation pit excavation. The normal force at monitoring points 6 and 10 decreased, whereas those at monitoring point 8 and 12 increased. A slight difference in the normal force of the tunnel structure was observed after the building loading and foundation pit excavation.Figure18 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 6, 9, and 12 in the four schemes were insignificantly different when the excavation of the foundation pit was completed. Moreover, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles was not obvious. At monitoring points 8 and 11, the additional normal force under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement was large, and the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increase in tunnel structure normal force. At monitoring points 5 and 10, the additional normal forces in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 were positive. This condition indicated that the normal forces of the tunnel structure are decreasing.At monitoring point 7, the additional normal force of the tunnel with the isolation pile reinforcement was large and positive. This condition showed that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal force of the tunnel structure.A slight difference in the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure was observed in schemes 1, 2, and 3. Under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the additional normal force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 11 was approximately 23.2 kPa larger than that without isolation pile reinforcement, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Analysis of Figure19 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 5, 6, and 10 slightly differed under the conditions with isolation pile reinforcement and without isolation pile reinforcement after the building loading. At monitoring points 8, 11, and 12, the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement were large, and the reinforcement effect was evident. At monitoring points 7 and 9, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal forces. The additional normal forces at monitoring points in schemes 1, 2, and 3 were close, and the reinforcement effects were similar. At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between additional normal forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was nearly 25.92 kPa, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.(2) Analysis of Additional Bending Moment. Figure 20 shows the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 21 and 22.Figure 20
Bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 21
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 22
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the building loading.Figure20 shows no evident difference in bending moments at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 after foundation pit excavation, and the bending moment at monitoring points 6, 8, 10, and 12 increased. The bending moments had no evident difference after the foundation pit excavation and building loading.Comparing Figures20 and 21 indicates that the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0 increased after foundation pit excavation. However, under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the increase in bending moments at different locations of the tunnel structure was small. The existence of isolation piles inhibited the increasing trend of the bending moments, and the reinforcement effect was evident.At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation pile reinforcement was approximately 17 kN m, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Similar rules were obtained when comparing Figures21 and 22. The reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of bending moments after the building loading. At monitoring point 10, the difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation piles was the largest, and the maximum difference of additional bending moments was −14.57 kN·m.(3) Analysis of Additional Shear Force. Figure 23 shows the shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 24 and 25.Figure 23
Shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 24
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation.Figure 25
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after building loading.As shown in Figure23, the shear forces increased at different monitoring points after foundation pit excavation. After foundation pit excavation and building loading, the change in shear forces of the tunnel structure was not evident.Analysis of Figures23–25 shows that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of shear forces after foundation pit excavation and building loading. At monitoring point 12, the difference between the additional shear forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was the largest at approximately −8.93 kN after foundation pit excavation and −7.34 kN after building load.The above-mentioned analysis revealed that the internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure increased generally after foundation pit excavation and building loading because of the extruding effect of the soil. The existence of isolation piles could play the role of bearing horizontal load of soil, reduce the horizontal displacement of the soil, and weaken the extruding effect of the soil on the tunnel structure. The increases in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure were restrained to varying degrees.


## 4.1. Establishment of Numerical Simulation Model

To avoid the influence of the boundary effect on the numerical simulation, the soil thickness outside the foundation pit was more than tripled foundation pit excavation depth. The length, width, and height were 90, 60, and 60 m, respectively. Figure9 shows the mesh of the numerical calculation model, and Figure 10 presents the mesh of isolation piles and supporting structure.Figure 9
Mesh of the numerical calculation model.Figure 10
Mesh of isolation piles and supporting structure.


## 4.2. Model Parameter Values

Hardened soil model could take into account the nonlinear characteristics of stress and strain of soil and could also reflect the complex stress path of soil during excavation of the foundation pit [25]. The modified Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model in midas GTS NX took into account the hardening characteristics of soil, which could better simulate the stress-strain behavior of soil during excavation of the foundation pit. Accordingly, the modified Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model was used in this study. In accordance with the suggested values of the midas GTS NX help file, unloading modulus took tripled loading modulus, and solid units were used to establish the soil. Table 1 presents the physical and mechanical parameters of the soil.Elastic constitutive models were used for the diaphragm wall, foundation slab, anchor cable, isolation piles, and tunnel structure. The diaphragm wall, tunnel structure, and foundation slab were simulated using plate units. The isolation piles were simulated using solid units. The anchor cable was simulated using implanted-type truss units. Table6 shows the physical and mechanical parameters of the structure.Table 6
Physical and mechanical parameters of the structure.
Structure name
Unit weight (kN/m³)
Elastic modulus (MPa)
Poisson’s ratio
Diaphragm wall
25
31500
0.20
Anchor cable
78
210000
0.25
Foundation slab
25
31500
0.20
Isolation pile
25
30000
0.20
Lining segment
25
34500
0.20


## 4.3. Numerical Simulation Procedures

The procedures of numerical simulation were similar to those of the model test. The number of numerical simulation procedures was 20 (Table7).Table 7
Numerical simulation procedures.
Procedure number
Procedure instructions
1
Initial stress state: displacement clearing
2
Construction of the shield tunnel, isolation piles, and diaphragm wall and displacement clearing
3
Soil excavation to −2.0 m depth
4
Construction of the first-layer anchor cable
5
Soil excavation to −4.0 m depth
6
Soil excavation to −6.0 m depth
7
Construction of the second-layer anchor cable
8
Soil excavation to −8.0 m depth
9
Soil excavation to −10.0 m depth
10
Construction of the third-layer anchor cable
11
Soil excavation to −12.0 m depth
12
Soil excavation to −14.0 m depth
13
Soil excavation to −15.0 m depth
14
Construction of basements of −4 and −3 stories
15
Construction of basements of −2 and −1 stories
16
Loading of the weights for the first and second stories
17
Loading of the weights for the third and fourth stories
18
Loading of the weights for the fifth and sixth stories
19
Loading of the weights for the seventh and eighth stories
20
Loading of the weights for the ninth and tenth stories


## 4.4. Result Analysis

### 4.4.1. Horizontal Displacement Analysis of Tunnel Structure

Figure11 shows the measuring point arrangement of the tunnel structure displacement for analyzing the tunnel structure displacement in the numerical simulation calculation results. Positive horizontal displacement represents the movement of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit.Figure 11
Layout of monitoring points for horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.(1) Tunnel Structure Displacement without Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in the building construction process without isolation pile reinforcement was calculated. Figure 12 shows the results.Figure 12
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure without isolation pile reinforcement.Figure12 shows that, without isolation pile reinforcement, the tunnel structure experienced horizontal displacement toward the foundation pit during excavation. When the foundation pit excavation was shallow, the difference in horizontal displacement between four measuring points was small. As the excavation depth increased, the horizontal deformations of the diaphragm wall and soil above the pit bottom were greater than those below the pit bottom. Consequently, the horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 was larger than that at monitoring point 3, and the difference gradually increased. The tunnel structure experienced torsional deformation toward the foundation pit. As the foundation pit excavation deepened, the torsional deformation became serious. After the foundation pit excavation was completed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure reached the maximum value. The tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement of 9.17 mm. The difference in displacement between the roof and the floor was 2.94 mm.In the building loading process, the increase in load extruded the soil at the bottom of the foundation pit. As a result, the diaphragm wall below the foundation pit bottom experienced deformation toward outside of the foundation pit. The tunnel structure went through minor displacement far from the foundation pit under the extruding effect of the soil. The horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure generated during the excavation unloading process recovered to a certain degree. Measuring point 3 at the bottom of the tunnel had the maximum displacement variation of −0.87 mm. The final difference in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor was 3.31 mm.(2) Tunnel Structure Displacement with Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Figures 13–15 show the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement in various schemes.Figure 13
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 1.Figure 14
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 2.Figure 15
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 3.As shown in Figures13–15, displacement laws of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement were similar to those under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. As the foundation pit excavation progressed, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure became serious. Monitoring point 1 at the tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement, whereas monitoring point 3 at the tunnel structure floor had the minimum horizontal displacement. The difference in horizontal displacement between monitoring points 4 and 2 of the tunnel structure was small, and the tunnel structure did not experience horizontal expansion deformation. As the building loading progressed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure slightly recovered.The tunnel structure displacement laws in numerical simulation were generally similar to those in the model test. The curve inflection point appeared after excavation of the foundation pit, and the calculation model was reasonable.In the building loading stage, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure increased slightly in the model test. The reason was that the building loading process in the model test was simulated by stratified laying of cast iron weights at the bottom of the foundation pit. Given the existence of gap between cast iron weights and the diaphragm wall, the diaphragm wall above the excavation surface and the neighboring soil would slightly move toward the foundation pit during the subsequent loading process. Under the comprehensive influence, the tunnel structure also produced slight displacement toward the foundation pit, but the displacement increment was slight. The horizontal displacement laws of the tunnel structure obtained by the two research methods were approximately identical, and the total displacement had little difference. The backfilling of the gap between the building and the diaphragm wall in numerical simulation restricted the horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall toward the foundation pit, which agreed well with engineering practice.Figure12 shows that horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 was slightly smaller than that at monitoring point 4, and the tunnel structure experienced outward expansion deformation in the horizontal direction. As shown in Figures 13–15, horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 overlapped with that at measuring point 4. Therefore, the difference in horizontal displacement between the left and right sides of the tunnel structure could be decreased, and the horizontal expansion deformation of the tunnel structure could be decreased by isolation pile reinforcement. Table 8 shows the tunnel structure deformation values.Table 8
Deformation values of the tunnel structure.
Scheme number
Maximum horizontal displacement (mm)
W after foundation pit excavation (mm)
W after building loading (mm)
0
9.17
2.94
3.31
1
6.53
2.19
2.32
2
6.61
2.23
2.38
3
6.80
2.36
2.50
W is the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor.As shown in Table8, the building loading process would increase the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor. As a result, the torsional deformation degree of the tunnel structure further elevated. During building construction in the engineering practice, tunnel structure monitoring should be enhanced and shear failure of the tunnel structure and connecting bolt caused by large torsional deformation of the tunnel structure should be prevented. Compared with the condition without isolation pile reinforcement, maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor were decreased under the condition with isolation pile reinforcement. Isolation pile reinforcement could reduce horizontal displacement and torsional deformation of the existing tunnel structure. Comparison of the deformation values of the tunnel structure in schemes 1 and 2 showed that the increase in burial depth of the pile top inconsiderably influenced the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. The reason was that isolation piles reduced deformations of the tunnel structure through joint stress bearing of the part embedded below the displacement-affected area of pit excavation and the part within a certain range above the existing tunnel axis elevation. Comparison of schemes 2 and 3 indicated that, after spacing of isolation piles was increased, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the structure roof and the floor slightly increased. Consequently, the tunnel structure torsion slightly increased. The increase in pile spacing would reduce the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. Thus, proper pile spacing should be selected in the layout plan of isolation piles.


### 4.4.2. The Internal Force Analysis of Transverse Tunnel Structure

Eight locations on the tunnel structure are selected as monitoring points. The additional internal force of the transverse tunnel structure indicates internal force in any procedure minus initial internal force. Figure16 shows the internal force monitoring points of the transverse tunnel structure, and the angle between each measuring point is 45°. The positive value of normal force indicates that the section is stretched. The positive value of bending moment implies that the inside of the tunnel structure is stretched and the outside of the tunnel structure is compressed. The positive value of shear force suggests that the microsection of the tunnel structure turns clockwise.Figure 16
Layout of monitoring points for internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure.(1) Analysis of Additional Axis Force. Figure 17 shows the normal force of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 18 and 19.Figure 17
Normal forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 18
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 19
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the building loading.As shown in Figure17, the normal force at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 had a slight difference after the foundation pit excavation. The normal force at monitoring points 6 and 10 decreased, whereas those at monitoring point 8 and 12 increased. A slight difference in the normal force of the tunnel structure was observed after the building loading and foundation pit excavation.Figure18 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 6, 9, and 12 in the four schemes were insignificantly different when the excavation of the foundation pit was completed. Moreover, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles was not obvious. At monitoring points 8 and 11, the additional normal force under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement was large, and the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increase in tunnel structure normal force. At monitoring points 5 and 10, the additional normal forces in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 were positive. This condition indicated that the normal forces of the tunnel structure are decreasing.At monitoring point 7, the additional normal force of the tunnel with the isolation pile reinforcement was large and positive. This condition showed that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal force of the tunnel structure.A slight difference in the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure was observed in schemes 1, 2, and 3. Under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the additional normal force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 11 was approximately 23.2 kPa larger than that without isolation pile reinforcement, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Analysis of Figure19 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 5, 6, and 10 slightly differed under the conditions with isolation pile reinforcement and without isolation pile reinforcement after the building loading. At monitoring points 8, 11, and 12, the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement were large, and the reinforcement effect was evident. At monitoring points 7 and 9, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal forces. The additional normal forces at monitoring points in schemes 1, 2, and 3 were close, and the reinforcement effects were similar. At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between additional normal forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was nearly 25.92 kPa, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.(2) Analysis of Additional Bending Moment. Figure 20 shows the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 21 and 22.Figure 20
Bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 21
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 22
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the building loading.Figure20 shows no evident difference in bending moments at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 after foundation pit excavation, and the bending moment at monitoring points 6, 8, 10, and 12 increased. The bending moments had no evident difference after the foundation pit excavation and building loading.Comparing Figures20 and 21 indicates that the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0 increased after foundation pit excavation. However, under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the increase in bending moments at different locations of the tunnel structure was small. The existence of isolation piles inhibited the increasing trend of the bending moments, and the reinforcement effect was evident.At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation pile reinforcement was approximately 17 kN m, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Similar rules were obtained when comparing Figures21 and 22. The reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of bending moments after the building loading. At monitoring point 10, the difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation piles was the largest, and the maximum difference of additional bending moments was −14.57 kN·m.(3) Analysis of Additional Shear Force. Figure 23 shows the shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 24 and 25.Figure 23
Shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 24
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation.Figure 25
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after building loading.As shown in Figure23, the shear forces increased at different monitoring points after foundation pit excavation. After foundation pit excavation and building loading, the change in shear forces of the tunnel structure was not evident.Analysis of Figures23–25 shows that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of shear forces after foundation pit excavation and building loading. At monitoring point 12, the difference between the additional shear forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was the largest at approximately −8.93 kN after foundation pit excavation and −7.34 kN after building load.The above-mentioned analysis revealed that the internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure increased generally after foundation pit excavation and building loading because of the extruding effect of the soil. The existence of isolation piles could play the role of bearing horizontal load of soil, reduce the horizontal displacement of the soil, and weaken the extruding effect of the soil on the tunnel structure. The increases in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure were restrained to varying degrees.


## 4.4.1. Horizontal Displacement Analysis of Tunnel Structure

Figure11 shows the measuring point arrangement of the tunnel structure displacement for analyzing the tunnel structure displacement in the numerical simulation calculation results. Positive horizontal displacement represents the movement of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit.Figure 11
Layout of monitoring points for horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.(1) Tunnel Structure Displacement without Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in the building construction process without isolation pile reinforcement was calculated. Figure 12 shows the results.Figure 12
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure without isolation pile reinforcement.Figure12 shows that, without isolation pile reinforcement, the tunnel structure experienced horizontal displacement toward the foundation pit during excavation. When the foundation pit excavation was shallow, the difference in horizontal displacement between four measuring points was small. As the excavation depth increased, the horizontal deformations of the diaphragm wall and soil above the pit bottom were greater than those below the pit bottom. Consequently, the horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 was larger than that at monitoring point 3, and the difference gradually increased. The tunnel structure experienced torsional deformation toward the foundation pit. As the foundation pit excavation deepened, the torsional deformation became serious. After the foundation pit excavation was completed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure reached the maximum value. The tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement of 9.17 mm. The difference in displacement between the roof and the floor was 2.94 mm.In the building loading process, the increase in load extruded the soil at the bottom of the foundation pit. As a result, the diaphragm wall below the foundation pit bottom experienced deformation toward outside of the foundation pit. The tunnel structure went through minor displacement far from the foundation pit under the extruding effect of the soil. The horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure generated during the excavation unloading process recovered to a certain degree. Measuring point 3 at the bottom of the tunnel had the maximum displacement variation of −0.87 mm. The final difference in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor was 3.31 mm.(2) Tunnel Structure Displacement with Isolation Pile Reinforcement. Figures 13–15 show the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement in various schemes.Figure 13
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 1.Figure 14
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 2.Figure 15
Horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure in scheme 3.As shown in Figures13–15, displacement laws of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement were similar to those under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. As the foundation pit excavation progressed, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure became serious. Monitoring point 1 at the tunnel structure roof had the maximum horizontal displacement, whereas monitoring point 3 at the tunnel structure floor had the minimum horizontal displacement. The difference in horizontal displacement between monitoring points 4 and 2 of the tunnel structure was small, and the tunnel structure did not experience horizontal expansion deformation. As the building loading progressed, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure slightly recovered.The tunnel structure displacement laws in numerical simulation were generally similar to those in the model test. The curve inflection point appeared after excavation of the foundation pit, and the calculation model was reasonable.In the building loading stage, the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure increased slightly in the model test. The reason was that the building loading process in the model test was simulated by stratified laying of cast iron weights at the bottom of the foundation pit. Given the existence of gap between cast iron weights and the diaphragm wall, the diaphragm wall above the excavation surface and the neighboring soil would slightly move toward the foundation pit during the subsequent loading process. Under the comprehensive influence, the tunnel structure also produced slight displacement toward the foundation pit, but the displacement increment was slight. The horizontal displacement laws of the tunnel structure obtained by the two research methods were approximately identical, and the total displacement had little difference. The backfilling of the gap between the building and the diaphragm wall in numerical simulation restricted the horizontal displacement of the diaphragm wall toward the foundation pit, which agreed well with engineering practice.Figure12 shows that horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 was slightly smaller than that at monitoring point 4, and the tunnel structure experienced outward expansion deformation in the horizontal direction. As shown in Figures 13–15, horizontal displacement at monitoring point 2 overlapped with that at measuring point 4. Therefore, the difference in horizontal displacement between the left and right sides of the tunnel structure could be decreased, and the horizontal expansion deformation of the tunnel structure could be decreased by isolation pile reinforcement. Table 8 shows the tunnel structure deformation values.Table 8
Deformation values of the tunnel structure.
Scheme number
Maximum horizontal displacement (mm)
W after foundation pit excavation (mm)
W after building loading (mm)
0
9.17
2.94
3.31
1
6.53
2.19
2.32
2
6.61
2.23
2.38
3
6.80
2.36
2.50
W is the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor.As shown in Table8, the building loading process would increase the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor. As a result, the torsional deformation degree of the tunnel structure further elevated. During building construction in the engineering practice, tunnel structure monitoring should be enhanced and shear failure of the tunnel structure and connecting bolt caused by large torsional deformation of the tunnel structure should be prevented. Compared with the condition without isolation pile reinforcement, maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor were decreased under the condition with isolation pile reinforcement. Isolation pile reinforcement could reduce horizontal displacement and torsional deformation of the existing tunnel structure. Comparison of the deformation values of the tunnel structure in schemes 1 and 2 showed that the increase in burial depth of the pile top inconsiderably influenced the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. The reason was that isolation piles reduced deformations of the tunnel structure through joint stress bearing of the part embedded below the displacement-affected area of pit excavation and the part within a certain range above the existing tunnel axis elevation. Comparison of schemes 2 and 3 indicated that, after spacing of isolation piles was increased, horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the structure roof and the floor slightly increased. Consequently, the tunnel structure torsion slightly increased. The increase in pile spacing would reduce the reinforcement effect of isolation piles. Thus, proper pile spacing should be selected in the layout plan of isolation piles.


## 4.4.2. The Internal Force Analysis of Transverse Tunnel Structure

Eight locations on the tunnel structure are selected as monitoring points. The additional internal force of the transverse tunnel structure indicates internal force in any procedure minus initial internal force. Figure16 shows the internal force monitoring points of the transverse tunnel structure, and the angle between each measuring point is 45°. The positive value of normal force indicates that the section is stretched. The positive value of bending moment implies that the inside of the tunnel structure is stretched and the outside of the tunnel structure is compressed. The positive value of shear force suggests that the microsection of the tunnel structure turns clockwise.Figure 16
Layout of monitoring points for internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure.(1) Analysis of Additional Axis Force. Figure 17 shows the normal force of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 18 and 19.Figure 17
Normal forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 18
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 19
Additional normal forces of the tunnel structure after the building loading.As shown in Figure17, the normal force at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 had a slight difference after the foundation pit excavation. The normal force at monitoring points 6 and 10 decreased, whereas those at monitoring point 8 and 12 increased. A slight difference in the normal force of the tunnel structure was observed after the building loading and foundation pit excavation.Figure18 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 6, 9, and 12 in the four schemes were insignificantly different when the excavation of the foundation pit was completed. Moreover, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles was not obvious. At monitoring points 8 and 11, the additional normal force under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement was large, and the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increase in tunnel structure normal force. At monitoring points 5 and 10, the additional normal forces in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 were positive. This condition indicated that the normal forces of the tunnel structure are decreasing.At monitoring point 7, the additional normal force of the tunnel with the isolation pile reinforcement was large and positive. This condition showed that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal force of the tunnel structure.A slight difference in the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure was observed in schemes 1, 2, and 3. Under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the additional normal force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 11 was approximately 23.2 kPa larger than that without isolation pile reinforcement, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Analysis of Figure19 shows that the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure at monitoring points 5, 6, and 10 slightly differed under the conditions with isolation pile reinforcement and without isolation pile reinforcement after the building loading. At monitoring points 8, 11, and 12, the additional normal forces of the tunnel structure under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement were large, and the reinforcement effect was evident. At monitoring points 7 and 9, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the normal forces. The additional normal forces at monitoring points in schemes 1, 2, and 3 were close, and the reinforcement effects were similar. At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between additional normal forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was nearly 25.92 kPa, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.(2) Analysis of Additional Bending Moment. Figure 20 shows the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 21 and 22.Figure 20
Bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 21
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the foundation pit excavation.Figure 22
Additional bending moments of the tunnel structure after the building loading.Figure20 shows no evident difference in bending moments at monitoring points 5, 7, 9, and 11 after foundation pit excavation, and the bending moment at monitoring points 6, 8, 10, and 12 increased. The bending moments had no evident difference after the foundation pit excavation and building loading.Comparing Figures20 and 21 indicates that the bending moments of the tunnel structure in scheme 0 increased after foundation pit excavation. However, under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement, the increase in bending moments at different locations of the tunnel structure was small. The existence of isolation piles inhibited the increasing trend of the bending moments, and the reinforcement effect was evident.At monitoring point 11, the maximum difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation pile reinforcement was approximately 17 kN m, and the reinforcement effect was the most evident.Similar rules were obtained when comparing Figures21 and 22. The reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of bending moments after the building loading. At monitoring point 10, the difference between the additional bending moments with and without isolation piles was the largest, and the maximum difference of additional bending moments was −14.57 kN·m.(3) Analysis of Additional Shear Force. Figure 23 shows the shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0. The additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation and building loading in schemes 0, 1, 2, and 3 are shown in Figures 24 and 25.Figure 23
Shear forces of the tunnel structure in scheme 0.Figure 24
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation.Figure 25
Additional shear forces of the tunnel structure after building loading.As shown in Figure23, the shear forces increased at different monitoring points after foundation pit excavation. After foundation pit excavation and building loading, the change in shear forces of the tunnel structure was not evident.Analysis of Figures23–25 shows that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles could reduce the increasing trend of shear forces after foundation pit excavation and building loading. At monitoring point 12, the difference between the additional shear forces with and without isolation pile reinforcement was the largest at approximately −8.93 kN after foundation pit excavation and −7.34 kN after building load.The above-mentioned analysis revealed that the internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure increased generally after foundation pit excavation and building loading because of the extruding effect of the soil. The existence of isolation piles could play the role of bearing horizontal load of soil, reduce the horizontal displacement of the soil, and weaken the extruding effect of the soil on the tunnel structure. The increases in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure were restrained to varying degrees.


## 5. Influencing Factors of Reinforcement Effects of Isolation Piles

The decrement in maximum horizontal displacement was used to evaluate the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure, and the reduction rate of the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor was used to evaluate the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure. The decrement in maximum horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement was defined as ΔS, as shown in equation (1). The reduction rate of the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor was defined as β, as shown in equation (2):(1)ΔS=S0−SZ,(2)β=W0−WZW0×100%,where S0 is the maximum horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 of the tunnel structure without isolation pile reinforcement, SZ is the maximum horizontal displacement at monitoring point 1 of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement, W0 is the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement, and WZ is the horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor under the condition with isolation pile reinforcement.The following equations were used to evaluate the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increase of internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure:(3)ΔN=NZ−N0,(4)ΔQ=QZ−Q0,(5)ΔM=MZ−M0,where NZ and N0 are the additional internal forces of the tunnel structure with and without isolation pile reinforcement, respectively; QZ and Q0 are the additional shear forces of the tunnel structure with and without isolation pile reinforcement, respectively; and MZ and M0 are the additional bending moments of the tunnel structure with and without isolation pile reinforcement, respectively.The monitoring points with the greatest effect of internal force reinforcement on the transverse tunnel structure under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement are selected for analysis. After the foundation pit excavation, the bending moment and normal force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 11 and the shear force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 12 are selected for analysis. After the building loading, the normal force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 11, the bending moment of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 10, and the shear force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 12 are selected for analysis.


### 5.1. Influence of Burial Depth of the Isolation Pile Top on Reinforcement Effects

#### 5.1.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The initial burial depth of the pile top was 0.5Z, and the increment was 0.125Z. The burial depth of the pile top was divided into 0.5Z, 0.625Z, 0.75Z, 0.875Z, 1Z, and 1.125Z. The pile spacing, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 3D, 0.8 m, and 2H, respectively. The calculation was carried out in six groups of numerical simulation tests, where H is the excavation depth of the foundation pit, Z is the burial depth of the tunnel axis, and D is the diameter of the isolation pile. Figure 26 shows the calculation results. Table 9 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 26
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.Table 9
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.
Isolation pile top depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.5Z
21.26
25.76
0.625Z
21.63
26.74
0.75Z
21.25
25.30
0.875Z
15.99
19.88
1Z
10.39
14.14
1.125Z
2.64
6.42Figure26 shows that when the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect changed slightly as the burial depth of the isolation pile top increased. When the pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect decreased. This result indicated that when elevation of the pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the limiting effect of isolation piles on displacement of the soil around the tunnel structure weakened and horizontal deformation of the soil and the tunnel structure relatively increased.Analysis of Table9 shows that when the isolation pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure weakened as burial depth increased. When the burial depth was 1.125Z, the reduction rates β after foundation pit excavation and building loading were 2.64% and 6.42%, respectively. The reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure could also be neglected. When isolation pile top elevation was above the tunnel structure roof, the increase in burial depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure. In the layout plan of isolation piles in the engineering practice, burial depth of the pile top should be reasonably set to ensure safety and economic efficiency of the layout plan.


#### 5.1.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure27, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 28, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 29.Figure 27
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 28
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 29
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figures18 and 19 show that the additional normal force at monitoring point 11 in scheme 0 was negative, and the construction process increased the normal force of the tunnel structure. Therefore, a large ΔN under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement corresponded to a small increase in tunnel structure normal force and an improved reinforcement effect. As shown in Figure 27, ΔN decreased with the increase in the buried depth of the isolation pile top after foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.Analysis of Figures21 and 22 showed that the additional bending moment at monitoring point 10 in scheme 0 was positive, whereas the additional bending moment at monitoring point 11 was negative. These results combined with the initial bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure indicated that the bending moment increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading. Therefore, a small ΔM at monitoring point 10 under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement indicates an improved restraint effect. Furthermore, a large ΔM at monitoring point 11 under the above-mentioned condition corresponds to an improved restraint effect.Analysis of Figure28 shows that, after the foundation pit excavation and the building loading, if the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure were similar, and if it was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles decreased evidently.Figures24 and 25 show that the additional shear force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 12 under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement was positive. The shear force of the tunnel structure increased after foundation pit excavation and building loading. Thus, a small ΔQ indicates an improved restraint effect.As shown in Figure29, the variation law of ΔQ after the foundation pit excavation and building loading was consistent. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles decreased gradually.Similar to the reinforcement effect law of tunnel structure displacement, the bending moments and shear forces of the transverse tunnel structure were smaller than those without isolation piles. When the top of the isolation pile was above the depth of the tunnel roof, and the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force were similar, and when the isolation pile top was below the depth of the tunnel roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force was evidently weakened. With the increase in the buried depth of the pile top, the normal force of the tunnel structure gradually increased, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure gradually weakened.


### 5.2. Influence of Burial Depth of the Isolation Pile Bottom on Reinforcement Effects

#### 5.2.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and pile spacing were 0, 0.8 m, and 2D, respectively, when studying the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different burial depths of the pile bottom of 1.7H, 1.8H, 1.9H, 2H, and 2.1H, as shown in Figure 30. Table 10 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 30
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.Table 10
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.
Isolation pile bottom depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1.7H
17.70
21.11
1.8H
22.46
27.24
1.9H
25.47
29.79
2H
27.68
32.18
2.1H
29.39
33.78Figure30 shows that as burial depth of the pile bottom increased, ΔS increased. The maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure decreased compared with that under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. The reinforcement effect was also gradually enhanced. Therefore, as the length of isolation piles embedded into the soil in the unaffected area increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. However, after the length exceeded a certain value, the increasing rate of ΔS gradually decreased, and the improvement in the reinforcement effect gradually slowed down. The increase in burial depth of the pile bottom could improve the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure but could also increase the material cost of construction.Analysis of Table10 indicates that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased as the burial depth of the pile bottom increased. However, the increasing rate of the reinforcement effect gradually decreased. Therefore, the burial depth of the pile bottom should be reasonably determined in the design process, and attention should be paid to economic benefits and favorable reinforcement effects in the engineering practice.


#### 5.2.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 32, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 33.Figure 31
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 32
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 33
Difference between the additional shear forces.As shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional normal forces ΔN under the conditions with and without isolation pile reinforcement slightly changed with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.Figure32 shows that the value of ΔM increased gradually with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation. ΔM decreased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom.As shown in Figure33, ΔQ decreased gradually with the increase in the depth of the isolation pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.Similar to the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure, increasing the buried depth of the isolation pile bottom could improve the restraint effect on the increasing trend in bending moment and shear force of the transverse tunnel structure and could protect the safety of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


### 5.3. Influence of Isolation Pile Spacing on Reinforcement Effects

#### 5.3.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Isolation pile spacing was divided into 1D, 2D, and 3D to study the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different pile spacing conditions. The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 0, 0.8 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 34 shows the results, and Table 11 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 34
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.Table 11
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.
Pile spacing
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1D
28.23
32.63
2D
25.47
29.79
3D
21.43
25.38Figure34 shows that when the pile spacing was 1D, the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure was the best. As pile spacing increased, the limiting effect of isolation piles on soil displacement weakened. During the foundation pit excavation, displacement of the soil was large and the tunnel structure took a large displacement under the extruding effect of the soil.Table11 shows that, with the increase in pile spacing, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor decreased from 28.23% to 21.43% at the completion of pit excavation and from 32.63% to 25.38% at the completion of building loading. The main reason was that the increase in pile spacing could reduce the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load of the soil, and the soil experienced large horizontal displacement deformation. Soil deformation had an extruding effect on the tunnel structure. Consequently, the difference in displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor after pit excavation and building loading increased, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased, and reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the tunnel structure gradually weakened. Therefore, pile spacing should be reasonably selected in actual engineering.


#### 5.3.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure35, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 36, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 37.Figure 35
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 36
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 37
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure35 shows that ΔN decreased gradually when the spacing of the isolation pile increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.As shown in Figure36, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation. By contrast, ΔM increased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure decreased accordingly.Figure37 shows that ΔQ increased gradually with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that when the spacing of isolation piles increased, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure decreased correspondingly. This was similar to that of the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure.


### 5.4. Influence of Isolation Pile Diameter on Reinforcement Effects

#### 5.4.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could increase the flexural rigidity and compressive rigidity of the piles. Therefore, the piles with a diameter of 0.8 m, 1 m, and 1.2 m were selected for analysis.The burial depth of the pile top, pile spacing, and depth of the pile bottom were 0, 1.6 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 38 shows the results, and Table 12 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 38
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.Table 12
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.
Pile diameter (m)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.8
25.47
29.79
1
36.39
41.39
1.2
40.48
45.62Figure38 shows that ΔS increased as pile diameter increased. Therefore, as the diameter of isolation piles increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could better restrict the displacement of soil and then reduce the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.Table12 shows that, with the increase in pile diameter, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor increased from 25.47% to 40.48% at the completion of pit excavation and from 29.79% to 45.62% at the completion of building loading.This shows that the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load increased with the increase of pile diameter, namely, the increase of pile rigidity. When the pile rigidity was large, the horizontal displacement of soil decreased in foundation pit excavation and building load processes. The extruding effect of soil on the tunnel structure and the torsional deformation of the tunnel structure decreased correspondingly.


#### 5.4.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure39, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 40, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 41.Figure 39
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 40
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 41
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure39 shows that ΔN increased gradually when the pile diameter increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.As shown in Figure40, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the pile diameter after the foundation pit excavation, and ΔM decreased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased accordingly.As shown in Figure41, ΔQ changed slightly with the increase in pile diameter, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that increasing the rigidity of isolation piles could improve the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increase in normal force and bending moment of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


## 5.1. Influence of Burial Depth of the Isolation Pile Top on Reinforcement Effects

### 5.1.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The initial burial depth of the pile top was 0.5Z, and the increment was 0.125Z. The burial depth of the pile top was divided into 0.5Z, 0.625Z, 0.75Z, 0.875Z, 1Z, and 1.125Z. The pile spacing, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 3D, 0.8 m, and 2H, respectively. The calculation was carried out in six groups of numerical simulation tests, where H is the excavation depth of the foundation pit, Z is the burial depth of the tunnel axis, and D is the diameter of the isolation pile. Figure 26 shows the calculation results. Table 9 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 26
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.Table 9
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.
Isolation pile top depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.5Z
21.26
25.76
0.625Z
21.63
26.74
0.75Z
21.25
25.30
0.875Z
15.99
19.88
1Z
10.39
14.14
1.125Z
2.64
6.42Figure26 shows that when the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect changed slightly as the burial depth of the isolation pile top increased. When the pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect decreased. This result indicated that when elevation of the pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the limiting effect of isolation piles on displacement of the soil around the tunnel structure weakened and horizontal deformation of the soil and the tunnel structure relatively increased.Analysis of Table9 shows that when the isolation pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure weakened as burial depth increased. When the burial depth was 1.125Z, the reduction rates β after foundation pit excavation and building loading were 2.64% and 6.42%, respectively. The reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure could also be neglected. When isolation pile top elevation was above the tunnel structure roof, the increase in burial depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure. In the layout plan of isolation piles in the engineering practice, burial depth of the pile top should be reasonably set to ensure safety and economic efficiency of the layout plan.


### 5.1.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure27, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 28, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 29.Figure 27
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 28
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 29
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figures18 and 19 show that the additional normal force at monitoring point 11 in scheme 0 was negative, and the construction process increased the normal force of the tunnel structure. Therefore, a large ΔN under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement corresponded to a small increase in tunnel structure normal force and an improved reinforcement effect. As shown in Figure 27, ΔN decreased with the increase in the buried depth of the isolation pile top after foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.Analysis of Figures21 and 22 showed that the additional bending moment at monitoring point 10 in scheme 0 was positive, whereas the additional bending moment at monitoring point 11 was negative. These results combined with the initial bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure indicated that the bending moment increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading. Therefore, a small ΔM at monitoring point 10 under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement indicates an improved restraint effect. Furthermore, a large ΔM at monitoring point 11 under the above-mentioned condition corresponds to an improved restraint effect.Analysis of Figure28 shows that, after the foundation pit excavation and the building loading, if the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure were similar, and if it was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles decreased evidently.Figures24 and 25 show that the additional shear force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 12 under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement was positive. The shear force of the tunnel structure increased after foundation pit excavation and building loading. Thus, a small ΔQ indicates an improved restraint effect.As shown in Figure29, the variation law of ΔQ after the foundation pit excavation and building loading was consistent. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles decreased gradually.Similar to the reinforcement effect law of tunnel structure displacement, the bending moments and shear forces of the transverse tunnel structure were smaller than those without isolation piles. When the top of the isolation pile was above the depth of the tunnel roof, and the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force were similar, and when the isolation pile top was below the depth of the tunnel roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force was evidently weakened. With the increase in the buried depth of the pile top, the normal force of the tunnel structure gradually increased, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure gradually weakened.


## 5.1.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The initial burial depth of the pile top was 0.5Z, and the increment was 0.125Z. The burial depth of the pile top was divided into 0.5Z, 0.625Z, 0.75Z, 0.875Z, 1Z, and 1.125Z. The pile spacing, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 3D, 0.8 m, and 2H, respectively. The calculation was carried out in six groups of numerical simulation tests, where H is the excavation depth of the foundation pit, Z is the burial depth of the tunnel axis, and D is the diameter of the isolation pile. Figure 26 shows the calculation results. Table 9 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 26
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.Table 9
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile top depths.
Isolation pile top depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.5Z
21.26
25.76
0.625Z
21.63
26.74
0.75Z
21.25
25.30
0.875Z
15.99
19.88
1Z
10.39
14.14
1.125Z
2.64
6.42Figure26 shows that when the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect changed slightly as the burial depth of the isolation pile top increased. When the pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect decreased. This result indicated that when elevation of the pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the limiting effect of isolation piles on displacement of the soil around the tunnel structure weakened and horizontal deformation of the soil and the tunnel structure relatively increased.Analysis of Table9 shows that when the isolation pile top was located below the tunnel structure roof, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure weakened as burial depth increased. When the burial depth was 1.125Z, the reduction rates β after foundation pit excavation and building loading were 2.64% and 6.42%, respectively. The reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure could also be neglected. When isolation pile top elevation was above the tunnel structure roof, the increase in burial depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure. In the layout plan of isolation piles in the engineering practice, burial depth of the pile top should be reasonably set to ensure safety and economic efficiency of the layout plan.


## 5.1.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure27, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 28, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 29.Figure 27
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 28
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 29
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figures18 and 19 show that the additional normal force at monitoring point 11 in scheme 0 was negative, and the construction process increased the normal force of the tunnel structure. Therefore, a large ΔN under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement corresponded to a small increase in tunnel structure normal force and an improved reinforcement effect. As shown in Figure 27, ΔN decreased with the increase in the buried depth of the isolation pile top after foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.Analysis of Figures21 and 22 showed that the additional bending moment at monitoring point 10 in scheme 0 was positive, whereas the additional bending moment at monitoring point 11 was negative. These results combined with the initial bending moments of the transverse tunnel structure indicated that the bending moment increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading. Therefore, a small ΔM at monitoring point 10 under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement indicates an improved restraint effect. Furthermore, a large ΔM at monitoring point 11 under the above-mentioned condition corresponds to an improved restraint effect.Analysis of Figure28 shows that, after the foundation pit excavation and the building loading, if the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure were similar, and if it was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of isolation piles decreased evidently.Figures24 and 25 show that the additional shear force of the tunnel structure at monitoring point 12 under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement was positive. The shear force of the tunnel structure increased after foundation pit excavation and building loading. Thus, a small ΔQ indicates an improved restraint effect.As shown in Figure29, the variation law of ΔQ after the foundation pit excavation and building loading was consistent. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was above the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed. When the elevation of the isolation pile top was below the tunnel structure roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles decreased gradually.Similar to the reinforcement effect law of tunnel structure displacement, the bending moments and shear forces of the transverse tunnel structure were smaller than those without isolation piles. When the top of the isolation pile was above the depth of the tunnel roof, and the restraint effects of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force were similar, and when the isolation pile top was below the depth of the tunnel roof, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend of the bending moment and shear force was evidently weakened. With the increase in the buried depth of the pile top, the normal force of the tunnel structure gradually increased, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure gradually weakened.


## 5.2. Influence of Burial Depth of the Isolation Pile Bottom on Reinforcement Effects

### 5.2.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and pile spacing were 0, 0.8 m, and 2D, respectively, when studying the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different burial depths of the pile bottom of 1.7H, 1.8H, 1.9H, 2H, and 2.1H, as shown in Figure 30. Table 10 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 30
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.Table 10
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.
Isolation pile bottom depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1.7H
17.70
21.11
1.8H
22.46
27.24
1.9H
25.47
29.79
2H
27.68
32.18
2.1H
29.39
33.78Figure30 shows that as burial depth of the pile bottom increased, ΔS increased. The maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure decreased compared with that under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. The reinforcement effect was also gradually enhanced. Therefore, as the length of isolation piles embedded into the soil in the unaffected area increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. However, after the length exceeded a certain value, the increasing rate of ΔS gradually decreased, and the improvement in the reinforcement effect gradually slowed down. The increase in burial depth of the pile bottom could improve the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure but could also increase the material cost of construction.Analysis of Table10 indicates that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased as the burial depth of the pile bottom increased. However, the increasing rate of the reinforcement effect gradually decreased. Therefore, the burial depth of the pile bottom should be reasonably determined in the design process, and attention should be paid to economic benefits and favorable reinforcement effects in the engineering practice.


### 5.2.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 32, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 33.Figure 31
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 32
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 33
Difference between the additional shear forces.As shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional normal forces ΔN under the conditions with and without isolation pile reinforcement slightly changed with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.Figure32 shows that the value of ΔM increased gradually with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation. ΔM decreased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom.As shown in Figure33, ΔQ decreased gradually with the increase in the depth of the isolation pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.Similar to the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure, increasing the buried depth of the isolation pile bottom could improve the restraint effect on the increasing trend in bending moment and shear force of the transverse tunnel structure and could protect the safety of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


## 5.2.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and pile spacing were 0, 0.8 m, and 2D, respectively, when studying the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different burial depths of the pile bottom of 1.7H, 1.8H, 1.9H, 2H, and 2.1H, as shown in Figure 30. Table 10 shows the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 30
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.Table 10
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile bottom depths.
Isolation pile bottom depth
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1.7H
17.70
21.11
1.8H
22.46
27.24
1.9H
25.47
29.79
2H
27.68
32.18
2.1H
29.39
33.78Figure30 shows that as burial depth of the pile bottom increased, ΔS increased. The maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure decreased compared with that under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. The reinforcement effect was also gradually enhanced. Therefore, as the length of isolation piles embedded into the soil in the unaffected area increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. However, after the length exceeded a certain value, the increasing rate of ΔS gradually decreased, and the improvement in the reinforcement effect gradually slowed down. The increase in burial depth of the pile bottom could improve the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure but could also increase the material cost of construction.Analysis of Table10 indicates that the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased as the burial depth of the pile bottom increased. However, the increasing rate of the reinforcement effect gradually decreased. Therefore, the burial depth of the pile bottom should be reasonably determined in the design process, and attention should be paid to economic benefits and favorable reinforcement effects in the engineering practice.


## 5.2.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 32, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 33.Figure 31
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 32
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 33
Difference between the additional shear forces.As shown in Figure31, the difference between the additional normal forces ΔN under the conditions with and without isolation pile reinforcement slightly changed with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.Figure32 shows that the value of ΔM increased gradually with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation. ΔM decreased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased with the increase in the depth of the pile bottom.As shown in Figure33, ΔQ decreased gradually with the increase in the depth of the isolation pile bottom after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.Similar to the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure, increasing the buried depth of the isolation pile bottom could improve the restraint effect on the increasing trend in bending moment and shear force of the transverse tunnel structure and could protect the safety of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


## 5.3. Influence of Isolation Pile Spacing on Reinforcement Effects

### 5.3.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Isolation pile spacing was divided into 1D, 2D, and 3D to study the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different pile spacing conditions. The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 0, 0.8 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 34 shows the results, and Table 11 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 34
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.Table 11
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.
Pile spacing
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1D
28.23
32.63
2D
25.47
29.79
3D
21.43
25.38Figure34 shows that when the pile spacing was 1D, the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure was the best. As pile spacing increased, the limiting effect of isolation piles on soil displacement weakened. During the foundation pit excavation, displacement of the soil was large and the tunnel structure took a large displacement under the extruding effect of the soil.Table11 shows that, with the increase in pile spacing, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor decreased from 28.23% to 21.43% at the completion of pit excavation and from 32.63% to 25.38% at the completion of building loading. The main reason was that the increase in pile spacing could reduce the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load of the soil, and the soil experienced large horizontal displacement deformation. Soil deformation had an extruding effect on the tunnel structure. Consequently, the difference in displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor after pit excavation and building loading increased, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased, and reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the tunnel structure gradually weakened. Therefore, pile spacing should be reasonably selected in actual engineering.


### 5.3.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure35, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 36, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 37.Figure 35
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 36
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 37
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure35 shows that ΔN decreased gradually when the spacing of the isolation pile increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.As shown in Figure36, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation. By contrast, ΔM increased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure decreased accordingly.Figure37 shows that ΔQ increased gradually with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that when the spacing of isolation piles increased, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure decreased correspondingly. This was similar to that of the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure.


## 5.3.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Isolation pile spacing was divided into 1D, 2D, and 3D to study the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different pile spacing conditions. The burial depth of the pile top, pile diameter, and burial depth of the pile bottom were 0, 0.8 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 34 shows the results, and Table 11 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 34
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.Table 11
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile spacing.
Pile spacing
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1D
28.23
32.63
2D
25.47
29.79
3D
21.43
25.38Figure34 shows that when the pile spacing was 1D, the reinforcement effect on horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure was the best. As pile spacing increased, the limiting effect of isolation piles on soil displacement weakened. During the foundation pit excavation, displacement of the soil was large and the tunnel structure took a large displacement under the extruding effect of the soil.Table11 shows that, with the increase in pile spacing, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor decreased from 28.23% to 21.43% at the completion of pit excavation and from 32.63% to 25.38% at the completion of building loading. The main reason was that the increase in pile spacing could reduce the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load of the soil, and the soil experienced large horizontal displacement deformation. Soil deformation had an extruding effect on the tunnel structure. Consequently, the difference in displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor after pit excavation and building loading increased, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure increased, and reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the tunnel structure gradually weakened. Therefore, pile spacing should be reasonably selected in actual engineering.


## 5.3.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure35, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 36, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 37.Figure 35
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 36
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 37
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure35 shows that ΔN decreased gradually when the spacing of the isolation pile increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.As shown in Figure36, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation. By contrast, ΔM increased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure decreased accordingly.Figure37 shows that ΔQ increased gradually with the increase in the spacing between isolation piles after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure decreased gradually.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that when the spacing of isolation piles increased, the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increasing trend in internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure decreased correspondingly. This was similar to that of the displacement reinforcement law of the tunnel structure.


## 5.4. Influence of Isolation Pile Diameter on Reinforcement Effects

### 5.4.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could increase the flexural rigidity and compressive rigidity of the piles. Therefore, the piles with a diameter of 0.8 m, 1 m, and 1.2 m were selected for analysis.The burial depth of the pile top, pile spacing, and depth of the pile bottom were 0, 1.6 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 38 shows the results, and Table 12 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 38
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.Table 12
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.
Pile diameter (m)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.8
25.47
29.79
1
36.39
41.39
1.2
40.48
45.62Figure38 shows that ΔS increased as pile diameter increased. Therefore, as the diameter of isolation piles increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could better restrict the displacement of soil and then reduce the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.Table12 shows that, with the increase in pile diameter, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor increased from 25.47% to 40.48% at the completion of pit excavation and from 29.79% to 45.62% at the completion of building loading.This shows that the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load increased with the increase of pile diameter, namely, the increase of pile rigidity. When the pile rigidity was large, the horizontal displacement of soil decreased in foundation pit excavation and building load processes. The extruding effect of soil on the tunnel structure and the torsional deformation of the tunnel structure decreased correspondingly.


### 5.4.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure39, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 40, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 41.Figure 39
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 40
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 41
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure39 shows that ΔN increased gradually when the pile diameter increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.As shown in Figure40, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the pile diameter after the foundation pit excavation, and ΔM decreased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased accordingly.As shown in Figure41, ΔQ changed slightly with the increase in pile diameter, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that increasing the rigidity of isolation piles could improve the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increase in normal force and bending moment of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


## 5.4.1. Analysis of Control Effects on Tunnel Structure Displacement

Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could increase the flexural rigidity and compressive rigidity of the piles. Therefore, the piles with a diameter of 0.8 m, 1 m, and 1.2 m were selected for analysis.The burial depth of the pile top, pile spacing, and depth of the pile bottom were 0, 1.6 m, and 1.9H, respectively. Figure 38 shows the results, and Table 12 presents the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure.Figure 38
Decrement in maximum horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.Table 12
Reinforcement effects of isolation piles on torsional deformation of the tunnel structure under different isolation pile diameters.
Pile diameter (m)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
0.8
25.47
29.79
1
36.39
41.39
1.2
40.48
45.62Figure38 shows that ΔS increased as pile diameter increased. Therefore, as the diameter of isolation piles increased, the displacement of the tunnel structure correspondingly decreased. Increasing the diameter of isolation piles could better restrict the displacement of soil and then reduce the horizontal displacement of the tunnel structure.Table12 shows that, with the increase in pile diameter, the reduction ratio of the maximum horizontal displacement difference between the tunnel structure roof and the floor increased from 25.47% to 40.48% at the completion of pit excavation and from 29.79% to 45.62% at the completion of building loading.This shows that the ability of isolation piles to bear horizontal load increased with the increase of pile diameter, namely, the increase of pile rigidity. When the pile rigidity was large, the horizontal displacement of soil decreased in foundation pit excavation and building load processes. The extruding effect of soil on the tunnel structure and the torsional deformation of the tunnel structure decreased correspondingly.


## 5.4.2. Analysis of Control Effects on Internal Force of Transverse Tunnel Structure

The difference between the additional normal forces is shown in Figure39, the difference between the additional bending moments is shown in Figure 40, and the difference between the additional shear forces is shown in Figure 41.Figure 39
Difference between the additional normal forces.Figure 40
Difference between the additional bending moments.Figure 41
Difference between the additional shear forces.Figure39 shows that ΔN increased gradually when the pile diameter increased after the foundation pit excavation and building loading, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in normal force of the tunnel structure increased gradually.As shown in Figure40, ΔM insignificantly changed with the increase in the pile diameter after the foundation pit excavation, and ΔM decreased slightly after the building loading. The restraint effect of isolation piles on the increasing trend in bending moment of the tunnel structure increased accordingly.As shown in Figure41, ΔQ changed slightly with the increase in pile diameter, and the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.From the above analysis, it can be concluded that increasing the rigidity of isolation piles could improve the restraint effect of the isolation piles on the increase in normal force and bending moment of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects of isolation piles on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.


## 6. Orthogonal Experiment Analysis of Influencing Factors

### 6.1. Orthogonal Experiment Design

In actual engineering, the isolation pile spacing, pile diameter, and burial depths of the pile top and bottom influence the reinforcement effect. In this study, the orthogonal experiment method of numerical simulation was used to analyze the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under the influence of four factors. Table13 shows the influencing factors and levels based on the analysis results obtained in Section 5.Table 13
Influencing factors and levels.
Influencing factors
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Pile bottom depth (A)
1.8H
1.9H
2H
Pile top depth (B)
0.5Z
0.625Z
0.75Z
Pile spacing (C)
1.6 m
2.4 m
3.2 m
Pile diameter (E)
0.8 m
1 m
1.2 mGiven that four factors and three levels were considered, an L9(34) orthogonal experiment table was used. Table 14 shows the orthogonal experiment scheme of the numerical simulation.Table 14
Orthogonal experiment scheme of the numerical simulation.
Scheme number
Pile bottom depth (A)
Pile top depth (B)
Pile spacing (C)
Pile diameter (E)
1
1.8H
0.5Z
1.6
0.8
2
1.8H
0.625Z
2.4
1
3
1.8H
0.75Z
3.2
1.2
4
1.9H
0.5Z
2.4
1.2
5
1.9H
0.625Z
3.2
0.8
6
1.9H
0.75Z
1.6
1
7
2H
0.5Z
3.2
1
8
2H
0.625Z
1.6
1.2
9
2H
0.75Z
2.4
0.8


### 6.2. Analysis of Orthogonal Experiment Results

Numerical simulation analysis of the experiment scheme in Table14 was carried out. In actual engineering, the influence of building construction on the adjacent existing tunnel structure was mainly evaluated by the displacement of the tunnel structure. Therefore, ΔS and β were selected as indexes to analyze the influence of different factors of isolation piles on the reinforcement effect on the tunnel structure, and a reasonable reinforcement scheme of isolation piles was given. Table 15 shows the obtained results.Table 15
Orthogonal experiment results of the numerical simulation.
Scheme number
ΔS (mm)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1
2.38
22.41
28.15
2
2.42
26.27
31.97
3
2.56
26.99
31.23
4
2.97
34.86
40.99
5
2.33
19.65
24.56
6
3.10
33.48
37.08
7
2.99
32.25
37.22
8
3.61
44.63
49.46
9
2.76
25.55
29.77Table16 shows the calculated average value Ki of ΔS and β at each factor and level. The range R is the difference between the maximum and minimum average values of the index under the condition of each level of each factor. R represents the change range of the indexes when the levels of factors change. A large R value of a factor indicates that it has a large influence on the index.Table 16
Influences of different factors on target.
Level
ΔS (mm)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
1
2.46
2.78
3.03
2.49
25.23
29.84
33.51
22.54
30.45
35.45
38.23
27.49
2
2.80
2.79
2.72
2.84
29.33
30.18
28.89
30.67
34.21
35.33
34.24
35.42
3
3.12
2.81
2.62
3.05
34.14
28.67
26.30
35.49
38.82
32.69
31.00
40.56
R
0.66
0.03
0.41
0.56
5.91
1.51
7.21
12.95
8.37
2.76
7.23
13.07On the basis of the analysis of Table16, the influence degrees of influencing factors of the reinforcement effect of isolation piles from high to low were sorted as follows: pile diameter, burial depth of the pile bottom, pile spacing, and burial depth of the pile top. The reduction in pile spacing could improve the reinforcement effect of isolation piles, and the optimal pile spacing was 1.6 m. Within a certain scope, the increase in burial depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect, and the optimal burial depth of the pile top was 0.75Z. The increase in burial depth of the pile bottom would increase the pile length embedded in the stable soil layer outside the affected area of foundation pit excavation. As a result, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the existing tunnel structure was improved, and the optimal burial depth of the pile bottom was 2H. The increase in pile diameter considerably improved the reinforcement effect of isolation piles, and the optimal pile diameter was 1.2 m.


## 6.1. Orthogonal Experiment Design

In actual engineering, the isolation pile spacing, pile diameter, and burial depths of the pile top and bottom influence the reinforcement effect. In this study, the orthogonal experiment method of numerical simulation was used to analyze the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under the influence of four factors. Table13 shows the influencing factors and levels based on the analysis results obtained in Section 5.Table 13
Influencing factors and levels.
Influencing factors
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Pile bottom depth (A)
1.8H
1.9H
2H
Pile top depth (B)
0.5Z
0.625Z
0.75Z
Pile spacing (C)
1.6 m
2.4 m
3.2 m
Pile diameter (E)
0.8 m
1 m
1.2 mGiven that four factors and three levels were considered, an L9(34) orthogonal experiment table was used. Table 14 shows the orthogonal experiment scheme of the numerical simulation.Table 14
Orthogonal experiment scheme of the numerical simulation.
Scheme number
Pile bottom depth (A)
Pile top depth (B)
Pile spacing (C)
Pile diameter (E)
1
1.8H
0.5Z
1.6
0.8
2
1.8H
0.625Z
2.4
1
3
1.8H
0.75Z
3.2
1.2
4
1.9H
0.5Z
2.4
1.2
5
1.9H
0.625Z
3.2
0.8
6
1.9H
0.75Z
1.6
1
7
2H
0.5Z
3.2
1
8
2H
0.625Z
1.6
1.2
9
2H
0.75Z
2.4
0.8


## 6.2. Analysis of Orthogonal Experiment Results

Numerical simulation analysis of the experiment scheme in Table14 was carried out. In actual engineering, the influence of building construction on the adjacent existing tunnel structure was mainly evaluated by the displacement of the tunnel structure. Therefore, ΔS and β were selected as indexes to analyze the influence of different factors of isolation piles on the reinforcement effect on the tunnel structure, and a reasonable reinforcement scheme of isolation piles was given. Table 15 shows the obtained results.Table 15
Orthogonal experiment results of the numerical simulation.
Scheme number
ΔS (mm)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
1
2.38
22.41
28.15
2
2.42
26.27
31.97
3
2.56
26.99
31.23
4
2.97
34.86
40.99
5
2.33
19.65
24.56
6
3.10
33.48
37.08
7
2.99
32.25
37.22
8
3.61
44.63
49.46
9
2.76
25.55
29.77Table16 shows the calculated average value Ki of ΔS and β at each factor and level. The range R is the difference between the maximum and minimum average values of the index under the condition of each level of each factor. R represents the change range of the indexes when the levels of factors change. A large R value of a factor indicates that it has a large influence on the index.Table 16
Influences of different factors on target.
Level
ΔS (mm)
β after foundation pit excavation (%)
β after building loading (%)
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
K
A
K
B
K
C
K
E
1
2.46
2.78
3.03
2.49
25.23
29.84
33.51
22.54
30.45
35.45
38.23
27.49
2
2.80
2.79
2.72
2.84
29.33
30.18
28.89
30.67
34.21
35.33
34.24
35.42
3
3.12
2.81
2.62
3.05
34.14
28.67
26.30
35.49
38.82
32.69
31.00
40.56
R
0.66
0.03
0.41
0.56
5.91
1.51
7.21
12.95
8.37
2.76
7.23
13.07On the basis of the analysis of Table16, the influence degrees of influencing factors of the reinforcement effect of isolation piles from high to low were sorted as follows: pile diameter, burial depth of the pile bottom, pile spacing, and burial depth of the pile top. The reduction in pile spacing could improve the reinforcement effect of isolation piles, and the optimal pile spacing was 1.6 m. Within a certain scope, the increase in burial depth of the pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect, and the optimal burial depth of the pile top was 0.75Z. The increase in burial depth of the pile bottom would increase the pile length embedded in the stable soil layer outside the affected area of foundation pit excavation. As a result, the reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the existing tunnel structure was improved, and the optimal burial depth of the pile bottom was 2H. The increase in pile diameter considerably improved the reinforcement effect of isolation piles, and the optimal pile diameter was 1.2 m.


## 7. Conclusions

Numerical simulation and similar material model test methods were used in this study to investigate building construction adjacent to the existing subway tunnel under the condition with isolation pile reinforcement. The reinforcement effects of isolation piles under the influence of different factors were obtained. The main conclusions were obtained as follows:(1)
In the process of foundation pit excavation and building loading, deformation laws of the tunnel structure with isolation pile reinforcement were similar to those under the condition without isolation pile reinforcement. The tunnel structure first experienced displacement toward the foundation pit, and this displacement slightly recovered in the building loading phase; however, torsional deformation of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit kept increasing. The internal force of the transverse tunnel structure also increased generally, and there was little difference between the internal forces of the transverse tunnel structure after foundation pit excavation and building loading. Under the condition of isolation pile reinforcement in the building construction, maximum horizontal displacement of the adjacent existing tunnel structure and differences in horizontal displacement between the tunnel structure roof and the floor were decreased. The horizontal displacement and torsional deformation of the tunnel structure toward the foundation pit were controlled. The increasing trend of internal forces in the transverse tunnel structure had been restrained to varying degrees, and disaster risk of the tunnel structure in the adjacent building construction was decreased.(2)
Above the burial depth of the tunnel structure roof, the increase in burial depth of the isolation pile top slightly influenced the reinforcement effect on deformation of the tunnel structure, the restraint effects on the increasing trend of shear force and bending moment of the transverse tunnel structure slightly differed, and the restraint effect on the increasing trend of normal force gradually weakened. The reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the tunnel structure was enhanced as burial depth of the pile bottom increased. However, the increasing rate of the reinforcement effect gradually decreased. Increasing the buried depth of the isolation pile bottom could improve the restraint effect on the increasing trend of bending moment and shear force of the transverse tunnel structure and could protect the safety of the tunnel structure. However, the restraint effects on the normal force of the tunnel structure slightly differed. Therefore, the burial depth of the pile bottom should be properly increased to improve the reinforcement effect. As isolation pile spacing increased, the reinforcement effect on the tunnel structure decreased. Therefore, pile spacing should be reasonably selected in the engineering practice to guarantee favorable reinforcement effects. Increasing the isolation pile diameter could improve the reinforcement effect on the displacement of the tunnel structure, and the restraint effect of isolation piles on the increase of normal force and bending moment of the tunnel structure was gradually enhanced. However, the restraint effects on the increasing trend in shear force of the tunnel structure slightly differed.(3)
The building process under four factors of isolation pile spacing, pile diameter, bottom depth, and top depth was analyzed by the orthogonal experiment using the numerical simulation method. The influence degrees of four factors on the reinforcement effect were obtained and sorted from high to low as follows: pile diameter, bottom depth, pile spacing, and top depth. The optimal parameter values of the four factors were 1.2 m, 2H, 1.6 m, and 0.75Z.(4)
The reinforcement effect of isolation piles on the existing shield tunnel in the adjacent building construction process was studied. The obtained conclusions could provide a corresponding reference for similar projects. However, this study did not investigate the reinforcement effects of isolation piles under different relative positions of the building on the existing shield tunnel. Moreover, the connection of tunnel lining segments in the model test should be further refined in the future test. These aspects should be studied in the future.



---

*Source: 9741306-2019-10-01.xml*