# Sequestration and Distribution Characteristics of Cd(II) byMicrocystis aeruginosa and Its Role in Colony Formation

Authors: Xiangdong Bi; Ran Yan; Fenxiang Li; Wei Dai; Kewei Jiao; Qixing Zhou; Qi Liu
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

To investigate the sequestration and distribution characteristics of Cd(II) byMicrocystis aeruginosa and its role inMicrocystis colony formation,M. aeruginosa was exposed to six different Cd(II) concentrations for 10 days. Cd(II) exposure caused hormesis in the growth ofM. aeruginosa. Low concentrations of Cd(II) significantly induced formation of smallMicrocystis colonies (P
<
0.05) and increased the intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) and bound extracellular polysaccharide (bEPS) contents ofM. aeruginosa significantly (P
<
0.05). There was a linear relationship between the amount of Cd(II) sequestrated by algal cells and the amount added to cultures in the rapid adsorption process that occurred during the first 5 min of exposure. After 10 d,M. aeruginosa sequestrated nearly 80% of 0.2 mg L−1 added Cd(II), while >93% of Cd(II) was sequestrated in the groups with lower added concentrations of Cd(II). More than 80% of the sequestrated Cd(II) was bioadsorbed by bEPS. The Pearson correlation coefficients of exterior and interior factors related to colony formation ofM. aeruginosa revealed that Cd(II) could stimulate the production of IPS and bEPS via increasing Cd(II) bioaccumulation and bioadsorption. Increased levels of cross-linking between Cd(II) and bEPS stimulated algal cell aggregation, which eventually promoted the formation ofMicrocystis colonies.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Microcystis blooms frequently occur in eutrophic freshwaters and their outbreaks always lead to water deoxygenation, microcystin pollution, and fish kill. DuringMicrocystis blooms, algal cells aggregate largely on the surface of water and can be visible. Colony formation plays a vital role in the occurrence ofMicrocystis blooms [1]. It protectsMicrocystis cells from zooplankton grazing [2], viral or bacterial attack, and other potential negative environmental factors [3] and also provides a competitive advantage over other phytoplankton species [4]. However, how unicellularMicrocystis cells aggregate into colonies exactly is not yet known. Previous studies have found that both biotic and abiotic factors, such as zooplankton grazing, nutritive salt, and microcystins, could stimulateMicrocystis colony formation [2, 4]. Both zooplankton grazing and microcystins were reported to increase the amount of extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and eventually stimulate aggregation ofMicrocystis cells [2].Cyanobacterial blooms frequently occur in eutrophic waters with serious metal pollution [5, 6]. Cadmium (Cd), as a nonessential metal for biology, has become an important pollutant in natural freshwaters due to increasing use in industry, agriculture, and anthropogenic activities [7]. The negative effects of Cd on the environment have been recognized and it readily accumulates in living organisms. It was documented that cyanobacteria (Synechocystis sp. BASO670 andSynechocystis sp. BASO672) had high tolerance to Cd(II)-induced toxic effects, and Cd(II) could significantly stimulate EPS production in these twoSynechocystis isolates [8]. In our previous study, we found there were significant differences in cadmium accumulation in four sizes ofMicrocystis colony [9] and cadmium accumulation decreased with increasingMicrocystis colony sizes. We speculated that cadmium ions might play an important role in the early stage ofMicrocystis colony formation in natural waters [9].To better predict, prevent, and controlMicrocystis blooms in natural waters, it is important to understand all the factors involved in triggering colony formation ofMicrocystis species. In this study, both sequestration and distribution characteristics of Cd(II) by toxicM. aeruginosa and physiological responses related to colony formation were investigated in laboratory conditions.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Cyanobacterial Culture

M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, a very common microcystin-producingMicrocystis strain, which was provided by the Institute of Hydrobiology of China, can form large visible colonies with non-microcystin-producingMicrocystis strains in natural waters.M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 were cultured in conical flasks containing sterilized BG11 medium (without EDTA) under a 12 light:12 dark cycle with a light density of 60 μmol m−2 s−1 at 25°C. To reduce any effects related to minor differences in photon irradiance and to maintain homogeneity, the flasks were shaken slightly four times every day and rearranged randomly. Cultures were grown until the exponential growth phase.


### 2.2. Experimental Design

CdCl2 (Merck, Germany) was dissolved in distilled water to prepare a stock solution (20000 mg L−1). Based on the median effective concentration EC50-96 h = 0.383 mg L−1, determined by the method of Vanewijk and Hoekstra [10] of Cd(II) onM. aeruginosa obtained in preliminary experiments, Cd(II) was added to algal culture at an initial density of 5.473 × 106 ind mL−1 to final concentrations of 0 (control), 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg L−1, with three replicate flasks per concentration. Samples were removed from the cultures at 0, 5, 10, 20, 60, and 120 min and then daily until the 10th day of the experiment, to determine the algal cell density, colony numbers, bioadsorption and bioaccumulation characteristics of Cd(II), and bound extracellular polysaccharide (bEPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) contents ofM. aeruginosa.


### 2.3. Effects of Cd(II) on Growth and Colony Formation ofM. aeruginosa

Algal cell density andM. aeruginosa colonies were measured using a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×40). To reduce erroneous results, samples were taken 1 cm below the water surface with movement by a wide-mouth pipette, and the flasks were shaken up slightly 30 min before taking samples. The inhibition rate (IR), the decrease of intact algae in suspension, was calculated using the following formula: IR (%) = (
N
0
-
N
S
)
/
N
0
×
100, where N
0 is algal cell density in the control (ind L−1) andN
S is algal cell density in the Cd(II)-added treatment (ind L−1) [11].M. aeruginosa were classified as unicellular, two-cell aggregation or colony (aggregation of ≥3 cells).


### 2.4. Determination of Bioadsorption and Bioaccumulation of Cd(II) byM. aeruginosa

Algal culture (500 mL) was centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was dried to constant weight at 180°C to determine the content of Cd(II) in the medium (μg L−1). The algal cell deposit was resuspended in 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 EDTA solution and then stirred with glass beads for 30 min to detach bEPS associated with the algal cells. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C, the algal cell deposit was used to determine Cd(II) content accumulated inside algal cells (pg cell−1). The resulting supernatant was dried to constant weight at 180°C to determine Cd(II) content bioadsorbed on the algal cell walls. The resulting solid was precisely weighed (0.5 g) and transferred into a polytetrafluoroethylene, where 7 mL of HNO3 and 1 mL of H2O2 were added. The digester was sealed tightly and placed in a microwave digestion system (ETHOS One, Milestone, Italy). The procedure for microwave digestion is summarized as follows: the digester was heated from 25°C to 180°C over 10 min and then held for 25 min to digest the samples. After complete digestion, the digestion solution was evaporated to 2.5 mL, transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask, and diluted with deionized water. A reagent blank was prepared using the same chemicals and digestion procedure as a comparison. Content of Cd(II) in collected samples was measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) using an ICP-9000 (N + M) (Thermo Jarrell Ash, USA), for which the detection limit of Cd is 0.01 mg kg−1.


### 2.5. Effects of Cd(II) on bEPS and IPS Production byM. aeruginosa

Algal culture (50 mL) was centrifuged at 5,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the cell pellet was washed with 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 EDTA solution using a glass rod. The resulting suspension was stirred with glass beads to detach bEPS associated with the algal cells. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C, the algal cell pellet and supernatant were collected to determine IPS and bEPS contents (pg cell−1), respectively. To precipitate proteins from the supernatant, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added to a final concentration of 10% and the precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 20 min at 4°C. The clear supernatant was precipitated overnight at 4°C with six volumes of 95% ethanol. TCA precipitation and ethanol precipitation were repeated once. After centrifugation (12,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C), the deposit obtained was dissolved in distilled water, dialyzed (3,600 mol wt cutoff tubing) against distilled water at 4°C for 24 h with 2 times, and then concentrated to 2 mL by rotary evaporation. The content of bEPS (pg cell−1) was estimated using the phenol-sulfuric acid method [12]. Algal cells were disrupted by freezing and thawing repeatedly to obtain IPS and then treated as for bEPS measurement.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as means ± SD and were subjected to Fisher’s least significant difference test (SPSS version 17.0) to determine significant differences (P
<
0.05) among groups [13]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was examined by pairedt-test (SPSS version 17.0) [14].


## 2.1. Cyanobacterial Culture

M. aeruginosa FACHB-905, a very common microcystin-producingMicrocystis strain, which was provided by the Institute of Hydrobiology of China, can form large visible colonies with non-microcystin-producingMicrocystis strains in natural waters.M. aeruginosa FACHB-905 were cultured in conical flasks containing sterilized BG11 medium (without EDTA) under a 12 light:12 dark cycle with a light density of 60 μmol m−2 s−1 at 25°C. To reduce any effects related to minor differences in photon irradiance and to maintain homogeneity, the flasks were shaken slightly four times every day and rearranged randomly. Cultures were grown until the exponential growth phase.


## 2.2. Experimental Design

CdCl2 (Merck, Germany) was dissolved in distilled water to prepare a stock solution (20000 mg L−1). Based on the median effective concentration EC50-96 h = 0.383 mg L−1, determined by the method of Vanewijk and Hoekstra [10] of Cd(II) onM. aeruginosa obtained in preliminary experiments, Cd(II) was added to algal culture at an initial density of 5.473 × 106 ind mL−1 to final concentrations of 0 (control), 0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg L−1, with three replicate flasks per concentration. Samples were removed from the cultures at 0, 5, 10, 20, 60, and 120 min and then daily until the 10th day of the experiment, to determine the algal cell density, colony numbers, bioadsorption and bioaccumulation characteristics of Cd(II), and bound extracellular polysaccharide (bEPS) and intracellular polysaccharide (IPS) contents ofM. aeruginosa.


## 2.3. Effects of Cd(II) on Growth and Colony Formation ofM. aeruginosa

Algal cell density andM. aeruginosa colonies were measured using a hemocytometer under a light microscope (×40). To reduce erroneous results, samples were taken 1 cm below the water surface with movement by a wide-mouth pipette, and the flasks were shaken up slightly 30 min before taking samples. The inhibition rate (IR), the decrease of intact algae in suspension, was calculated using the following formula: IR (%) = (
N
0
-
N
S
)
/
N
0
×
100, where N
0 is algal cell density in the control (ind L−1) andN
S is algal cell density in the Cd(II)-added treatment (ind L−1) [11].M. aeruginosa were classified as unicellular, two-cell aggregation or colony (aggregation of ≥3 cells).


## 2.4. Determination of Bioadsorption and Bioaccumulation of Cd(II) byM. aeruginosa

Algal culture (500 mL) was centrifuged at 10,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was dried to constant weight at 180°C to determine the content of Cd(II) in the medium (μg L−1). The algal cell deposit was resuspended in 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 EDTA solution and then stirred with glass beads for 30 min to detach bEPS associated with the algal cells. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C, the algal cell deposit was used to determine Cd(II) content accumulated inside algal cells (pg cell−1). The resulting supernatant was dried to constant weight at 180°C to determine Cd(II) content bioadsorbed on the algal cell walls. The resulting solid was precisely weighed (0.5 g) and transferred into a polytetrafluoroethylene, where 7 mL of HNO3 and 1 mL of H2O2 were added. The digester was sealed tightly and placed in a microwave digestion system (ETHOS One, Milestone, Italy). The procedure for microwave digestion is summarized as follows: the digester was heated from 25°C to 180°C over 10 min and then held for 25 min to digest the samples. After complete digestion, the digestion solution was evaporated to 2.5 mL, transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask, and diluted with deionized water. A reagent blank was prepared using the same chemicals and digestion procedure as a comparison. Content of Cd(II) in collected samples was measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) using an ICP-9000 (N + M) (Thermo Jarrell Ash, USA), for which the detection limit of Cd is 0.01 mg kg−1.


## 2.5. Effects of Cd(II) on bEPS and IPS Production byM. aeruginosa

Algal culture (50 mL) was centrifuged at 5,000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C, and the cell pellet was washed with 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 EDTA solution using a glass rod. The resulting suspension was stirred with glass beads to detach bEPS associated with the algal cells. After centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C, the algal cell pellet and supernatant were collected to determine IPS and bEPS contents (pg cell−1), respectively. To precipitate proteins from the supernatant, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) was added to a final concentration of 10% and the precipitated proteins were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 ×g for 20 min at 4°C. The clear supernatant was precipitated overnight at 4°C with six volumes of 95% ethanol. TCA precipitation and ethanol precipitation were repeated once. After centrifugation (12,000 ×g for 30 min at 4°C), the deposit obtained was dissolved in distilled water, dialyzed (3,600 mol wt cutoff tubing) against distilled water at 4°C for 24 h with 2 times, and then concentrated to 2 mL by rotary evaporation. The content of bEPS (pg cell−1) was estimated using the phenol-sulfuric acid method [12]. Algal cells were disrupted by freezing and thawing repeatedly to obtain IPS and then treated as for bEPS measurement.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as means ± SD and were subjected to Fisher’s least significant difference test (SPSS version 17.0) to determine significant differences (P
<
0.05) among groups [13]. The Pearson correlation coefficient was examined by pairedt-test (SPSS version 17.0) [14].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Effects of Cd(II) on Growth ofM. aeruginosa

The growth ofM. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was affected in a Cd(II) concentration-dependent manner. With increasing exposure time,M. aeruginosa cell densities increased in low concentration Cd(II)-added groups (0.0125 and 0.025 mg L−1) and decreased in high-concentration Cd(II)-added groups (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg L−1) as compared with the control groups (Figure 1). These results indicated that Cd(II) had a dual effect (promotion and inhibition) on the growth ofM. aeruginosa. Such an effect is described as hormesis, a dose-response relationship characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition [15]. Gong et al. found that inorganic arsenic could also cause hormesis inM. aeruginosa FACHB 905 [16]. In our experiment, high Cd(II) of concentrations inhibited the growth, possibly because the Cd(II) concentration exceeded the tolerance limit ofM. aeruginosa cells, causing cell structure damage and disintegration. Among the tested concentrations, 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II) exhibited the strongest inhibitory effects, with a 4-day IR of 74.752% and a 10-day IR of 99.992% (Figure 2). It is documented thatM. aeruginosa PCC 7806 was susceptible to trace metal toxicity [17], while aM. aeruginosa strain isolated in the Czech Republic had high tolerance to 5.0–10.0 mg L−1 Cd(II) [18]. Therefore, it is possible that different strains ofM. aeruginosa have different sensitivities to Cd(II)-induced toxicity.Figure 1
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on algal cell density ofM. aeruginosa.Figure 2
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the inhibition rate ofM. aeruginosa.


### 3.2. Effects of Cd(II) on Colony Formation byM. aeruginosa

Compared with colonial forms that predominate in natural conditions,Microcystis exists mainly as noncolonial (single and a few paired) cells in culture [19]. Colony formation ofM. aeruginosa is a phenotypic response of single cells to environmental stress [3]. ColonialMicrocystis had higher endurance to heavy metal-induced stress than noncolonialMicrocystis [20]. Our results show that three concentrations of Cd(II) (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg L−1) significantly inducedMicrocystis colony formation (P
<
0.05), and 0.2 mg L−1 Cd(II) had the highest inductive effect (Figure 3). The proportion ofMicrocystis colonies was significantly decreased in the 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II)-added group after 4 d, and noMicrocystis colonies could be observed under the microscope after 6 d, which might result from the strong inhibitory effects of 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II) on the growth ofM. aeruginosa (Figures 1, 2, and 3). No colonies with five or more cells were observed during the whole experimental period. Unlike Fe, Al, Mn, Pb, and Cr, Cd was the only heavy metal element accumulated much higher in smallMicrocystis colony than in middle, large, and super-large colonies in natural waters [9]. These observations indicate that Cd(II) may play an important role in the early stage ofMicrocystis colony formation in natural waters [9].Figure 3
Effects of Cd(II) on colony formation byM. aeruginosa. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


### 3.3. Sequestration and Distribution Characteristics of Cd(II) byMicrocystis Cells

WhenMicrocystis cells were exposed to Cd(II), a rapid adsorption process occurred in the first 5 min. There was a linear relationship between Cd(II) sequestrated by algal cells (including Cd(II) bioadsorbed on bEPS and bioaccumulated inside cells) and the added Cd(II) concentrations during this time period (y = 8.5326x − 8.664; R
2 = 0.9864). More chances for metal ions to combine with cation-chelating binding sites in bEPS were provided with the increasing Cd(II) concentrations [21, 22]. Once Cd(II) was bioadsorbed onto the external cell wall, an internal bioaccumulation process would begin immediately [23]. Use of different strains ofM. aeruginosa might lead to a longer adsorption process (10 min) [24]. In our experiment, there was also a slow adsorption process following the initial 5 min rapid adsorption, suggesting that Cd(II) was removed via interactions with functional groups on the cell surface [8, 17].On longer Cd(II) exposure the proportion of Cd(II) sequestrated inMicrocystis cells increased, reaching >93% at the end of the 10th day in the groups exposed to ≤0.1 mg L−1 Cd(II) (Figure 4).M. aeruginosa sequestrated >80% of the 0.2 mg L−1 added Cd(II). We suggest that when 0.2 mg L−1 Cd(II) was added, Cd(II) sequestration byM. aeruginosa cells reached its saturation level. Considering the sequestration Cd(II) inM. aeruginosa, >80% was bioadsorbed by bEPS and <20% was bioaccumulated inside algal cell (Figures 5 and 6), which is consistent with the results of Parker et al. [25] and Ozturk et al. [8].Figure 4
Changes in the proportions of Cd(II) bioadsorbed by bEPS and bioaccumulated inside algal cells and of Cd(II) in the culture medium forM. aeruginosa exposed to various concentrations of Cd(II).Figure 5
Cd(II) content bioaccumulated inside algal cells. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).Figure 6
Cd(II) bioadsorbed by bEPS. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


### 3.4. Effects of Cd(II) on bEPS and IPS Production byM. aeruginosa

Under normal physiological conditions, polysaccharide produced in cells can be partially secreted to form EPS. The cyanobacterial EPS can be divided into two main groups: polysaccharides bound to the cell surface (bEPS) and soluble polysaccharides released into the surrounding environment (soluble extracellular polysaccharide, sEPS) [26]. Bound extracellular polysaccharide, referred to as sheath, capsule, or slime, plays an important role in the attachment ofM. aeruginosa cells into colonies and in protecting cells from unfavorable environmental conditions [26]. Compared to the control, no significant changes in IPS content were observed inM. aeruginosa exposed to 0.0125 and 0.025 mg L−1 Cd(II) throughout the experiment, and a similar result was obtained for bEPS for the first 6 days (Figures 7 and 8), becauseM. aeruginosa in long-term laboratory culture responded only slowly to slight environmental disturbance [27]. Higher concentrations of Cd(II) (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg L−1) significantly and simultaneously increased IPS and bEPS levels throughout the experimental period (P
<
0.05) (Figures 7 and 8). IPS and bEPS contents changed in the same way as each other after Cd(II) exposure and had a high Pearson correlation coefficient throughout the experiment (Table 1), suggestingMicrocystis cells could respond positively to Cd(II) stress by secreting organic substances (mainly polysaccharides) via active transport [28] (Figures 7 and 8). It is also worth noting that Cd(II) could significantly stimulate bEPS production ofM. aeruginosa at relatively low concentrations, while the stimulatory activities of Pb(II) were observed at much higher concentrations [29]. Therefore, we speculate that Cd(II) at low concentration could promote the early formation ofMicrocystis colonies by stimulating bEPS production in natural waters.Table 1
Pearson correlation coefficients of exterior and interior factors related to the colony formation ofM. aeruginosa.
Time
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations with amounts of Cd(II) bioabsorbed on bEPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations with amounts of Cd(II) bioaccumulated inside per unit algal cell
Relationship of amounts of Cd(II) bioabsorbed per unit algal cell with amounts of bEPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of amounts of Cd(II) bioaccumulated inside per unit algal cell with amounts of IPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of bEPS per unit algal cell with IPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations withMicrocystis colony formation
2 d
0.994∗
∗
0.977∗
∗
0.897∗
∗
0.513∗
0.891∗
∗
0.724∗
∗
4 d
0.988∗
∗
0.980∗
∗
0.829∗
∗
0.821∗
∗
0.985∗
∗
0.823∗
∗
6 d
0.976∗
∗
0.975∗
∗
0.667∗
∗
0.732∗
∗
0.981∗
∗
0.914∗
∗
8 d
0.978∗
∗
0.978∗
∗
0.628∗
∗
0.682∗
∗
0.990∗
∗
0.955∗
∗
10 d
0.987∗
∗
0.986∗
∗
0.737∗
∗
0.795∗
∗
0.997∗
∗
0.933∗
∗
∗
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). ∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).Figure 7
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the bEPS content ofM. aeruginosa (pg/cell). Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).Figure 8
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the IPS content ofM. aeruginosa(pg/cell). Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


### 3.5. Role of Cd(II) in Colony Formation ofM. aeruginosa

The Pearson correlation coefficients of exterior and interior factors related to colony formation byM. aeruginosa are shown in Table 1. With increasing concentrations of Cd(II) added to the culture medium, Cd(II) bioadsorption onto bEPS and Cd(II) bioaccumulation inside algal cells significantly increased. Increased Cd(II) bioaccumulation inside algal cells stimulated more IPS production. We suggest that, through active transport [28], more IPS was secreted outside the cells, leading to an increased chance of cross-linking between Cd(II) and bEPS [30]. Algal cell aggregation was stimulated by this increased cross-linking, which eventually promoted the formation ofMicrocystis colonies.


## 3.1. Effects of Cd(II) on Growth ofM. aeruginosa

The growth ofM. aeruginosa FACHB-905 was affected in a Cd(II) concentration-dependent manner. With increasing exposure time,M. aeruginosa cell densities increased in low concentration Cd(II)-added groups (0.0125 and 0.025 mg L−1) and decreased in high-concentration Cd(II)-added groups (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg L−1) as compared with the control groups (Figure 1). These results indicated that Cd(II) had a dual effect (promotion and inhibition) on the growth ofM. aeruginosa. Such an effect is described as hormesis, a dose-response relationship characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition [15]. Gong et al. found that inorganic arsenic could also cause hormesis inM. aeruginosa FACHB 905 [16]. In our experiment, high Cd(II) of concentrations inhibited the growth, possibly because the Cd(II) concentration exceeded the tolerance limit ofM. aeruginosa cells, causing cell structure damage and disintegration. Among the tested concentrations, 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II) exhibited the strongest inhibitory effects, with a 4-day IR of 74.752% and a 10-day IR of 99.992% (Figure 2). It is documented thatM. aeruginosa PCC 7806 was susceptible to trace metal toxicity [17], while aM. aeruginosa strain isolated in the Czech Republic had high tolerance to 5.0–10.0 mg L−1 Cd(II) [18]. Therefore, it is possible that different strains ofM. aeruginosa have different sensitivities to Cd(II)-induced toxicity.Figure 1
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on algal cell density ofM. aeruginosa.Figure 2
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the inhibition rate ofM. aeruginosa.


## 3.2. Effects of Cd(II) on Colony Formation byM. aeruginosa

Compared with colonial forms that predominate in natural conditions,Microcystis exists mainly as noncolonial (single and a few paired) cells in culture [19]. Colony formation ofM. aeruginosa is a phenotypic response of single cells to environmental stress [3]. ColonialMicrocystis had higher endurance to heavy metal-induced stress than noncolonialMicrocystis [20]. Our results show that three concentrations of Cd(II) (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg L−1) significantly inducedMicrocystis colony formation (P
<
0.05), and 0.2 mg L−1 Cd(II) had the highest inductive effect (Figure 3). The proportion ofMicrocystis colonies was significantly decreased in the 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II)-added group after 4 d, and noMicrocystis colonies could be observed under the microscope after 6 d, which might result from the strong inhibitory effects of 0.4 mg L−1 Cd(II) on the growth ofM. aeruginosa (Figures 1, 2, and 3). No colonies with five or more cells were observed during the whole experimental period. Unlike Fe, Al, Mn, Pb, and Cr, Cd was the only heavy metal element accumulated much higher in smallMicrocystis colony than in middle, large, and super-large colonies in natural waters [9]. These observations indicate that Cd(II) may play an important role in the early stage ofMicrocystis colony formation in natural waters [9].Figure 3
Effects of Cd(II) on colony formation byM. aeruginosa. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


## 3.3. Sequestration and Distribution Characteristics of Cd(II) byMicrocystis Cells

WhenMicrocystis cells were exposed to Cd(II), a rapid adsorption process occurred in the first 5 min. There was a linear relationship between Cd(II) sequestrated by algal cells (including Cd(II) bioadsorbed on bEPS and bioaccumulated inside cells) and the added Cd(II) concentrations during this time period (y = 8.5326x − 8.664; R
2 = 0.9864). More chances for metal ions to combine with cation-chelating binding sites in bEPS were provided with the increasing Cd(II) concentrations [21, 22]. Once Cd(II) was bioadsorbed onto the external cell wall, an internal bioaccumulation process would begin immediately [23]. Use of different strains ofM. aeruginosa might lead to a longer adsorption process (10 min) [24]. In our experiment, there was also a slow adsorption process following the initial 5 min rapid adsorption, suggesting that Cd(II) was removed via interactions with functional groups on the cell surface [8, 17].On longer Cd(II) exposure the proportion of Cd(II) sequestrated inMicrocystis cells increased, reaching >93% at the end of the 10th day in the groups exposed to ≤0.1 mg L−1 Cd(II) (Figure 4).M. aeruginosa sequestrated >80% of the 0.2 mg L−1 added Cd(II). We suggest that when 0.2 mg L−1 Cd(II) was added, Cd(II) sequestration byM. aeruginosa cells reached its saturation level. Considering the sequestration Cd(II) inM. aeruginosa, >80% was bioadsorbed by bEPS and <20% was bioaccumulated inside algal cell (Figures 5 and 6), which is consistent with the results of Parker et al. [25] and Ozturk et al. [8].Figure 4
Changes in the proportions of Cd(II) bioadsorbed by bEPS and bioaccumulated inside algal cells and of Cd(II) in the culture medium forM. aeruginosa exposed to various concentrations of Cd(II).Figure 5
Cd(II) content bioaccumulated inside algal cells. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).Figure 6
Cd(II) bioadsorbed by bEPS. Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


## 3.4. Effects of Cd(II) on bEPS and IPS Production byM. aeruginosa

Under normal physiological conditions, polysaccharide produced in cells can be partially secreted to form EPS. The cyanobacterial EPS can be divided into two main groups: polysaccharides bound to the cell surface (bEPS) and soluble polysaccharides released into the surrounding environment (soluble extracellular polysaccharide, sEPS) [26]. Bound extracellular polysaccharide, referred to as sheath, capsule, or slime, plays an important role in the attachment ofM. aeruginosa cells into colonies and in protecting cells from unfavorable environmental conditions [26]. Compared to the control, no significant changes in IPS content were observed inM. aeruginosa exposed to 0.0125 and 0.025 mg L−1 Cd(II) throughout the experiment, and a similar result was obtained for bEPS for the first 6 days (Figures 7 and 8), becauseM. aeruginosa in long-term laboratory culture responded only slowly to slight environmental disturbance [27]. Higher concentrations of Cd(II) (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mg L−1) significantly and simultaneously increased IPS and bEPS levels throughout the experimental period (P
<
0.05) (Figures 7 and 8). IPS and bEPS contents changed in the same way as each other after Cd(II) exposure and had a high Pearson correlation coefficient throughout the experiment (Table 1), suggestingMicrocystis cells could respond positively to Cd(II) stress by secreting organic substances (mainly polysaccharides) via active transport [28] (Figures 7 and 8). It is also worth noting that Cd(II) could significantly stimulate bEPS production ofM. aeruginosa at relatively low concentrations, while the stimulatory activities of Pb(II) were observed at much higher concentrations [29]. Therefore, we speculate that Cd(II) at low concentration could promote the early formation ofMicrocystis colonies by stimulating bEPS production in natural waters.Table 1
Pearson correlation coefficients of exterior and interior factors related to the colony formation ofM. aeruginosa.
Time
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations with amounts of Cd(II) bioabsorbed on bEPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations with amounts of Cd(II) bioaccumulated inside per unit algal cell
Relationship of amounts of Cd(II) bioabsorbed per unit algal cell with amounts of bEPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of amounts of Cd(II) bioaccumulated inside per unit algal cell with amounts of IPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of bEPS per unit algal cell with IPS per unit algal cell
Relationship of initial Cd(II) concentrations withMicrocystis colony formation
2 d
0.994∗
∗
0.977∗
∗
0.897∗
∗
0.513∗
0.891∗
∗
0.724∗
∗
4 d
0.988∗
∗
0.980∗
∗
0.829∗
∗
0.821∗
∗
0.985∗
∗
0.823∗
∗
6 d
0.976∗
∗
0.975∗
∗
0.667∗
∗
0.732∗
∗
0.981∗
∗
0.914∗
∗
8 d
0.978∗
∗
0.978∗
∗
0.628∗
∗
0.682∗
∗
0.990∗
∗
0.955∗
∗
10 d
0.987∗
∗
0.986∗
∗
0.737∗
∗
0.795∗
∗
0.997∗
∗
0.933∗
∗
∗
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed). ∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).Figure 7
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the bEPS content ofM. aeruginosa (pg/cell). Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).Figure 8
Effects of various concentrations of Cd(II) on the IPS content ofM. aeruginosa(pg/cell). Values sharing the same letters are not significantly different, whereas those marked with different letters are significantly different (P
<
0.05).


## 3.5. Role of Cd(II) in Colony Formation ofM. aeruginosa

The Pearson correlation coefficients of exterior and interior factors related to colony formation byM. aeruginosa are shown in Table 1. With increasing concentrations of Cd(II) added to the culture medium, Cd(II) bioadsorption onto bEPS and Cd(II) bioaccumulation inside algal cells significantly increased. Increased Cd(II) bioaccumulation inside algal cells stimulated more IPS production. We suggest that, through active transport [28], more IPS was secreted outside the cells, leading to an increased chance of cross-linking between Cd(II) and bEPS [30]. Algal cell aggregation was stimulated by this increased cross-linking, which eventually promoted the formation ofMicrocystis colonies.


## 4. Conclusions

M. aeruginosa was very sensitive to Cd(II) compared to other heavy metal ions and adsorbed >93% of the Cd(II) in the culture medium when exposed to ≤0.1 mg L−1 Cd(II). Among the sequestrated Cd(II) inM. aeruginosa, >80% was bioadsorbed by bEPS, and <20% was bioaccumulated inside algal cells. Under the stress of Cd(II),M. aeruginosa increased the production of IPS and bEPS, which could significantly promote the formation of small colonies. Notably, this phenomenon occurred at low Cd(II) concentrations, close to those found in natural waters. Moreover, we have found that Pb(II) in the tolerance range ofM. aeruginosa could stimulate bEPS production, which promoted colony formation [29]. Therefore, heavy metals with different stimulatory effects on different stages of the formation ofMicrocystis colonies might be one factor that contributes to the occurrence ofM. aeruginosa blooms in natural conditions.



---

*Source: 9837598-2016-09-29.xml*