# Phytochemistry, Antioxidant Activity, Antiproliferative Effect, and Acute Toxicity Testing of Two MoroccanAristolochia Species

Authors: Mohammed Bourhia; Fatima Ezzahra Laasri; Samir Iben Moussa; Riaz Ullah; Ahmed Bari; Syed Saeed Ali; Aghmih Kaoutar; Amal Ait Haj Said; Mohammed El Mzibri; Gmouh Said; Naima Khlil; Laila Benbacer
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Ethnopharmacological Relevance. Aristolochia baetica (A. baetica) and Aristolochia paucinervis (A. paucinervis) have been largely used in Moroccan folk medicine. The objective of the study was to investigate the phytochemical composition, the antioxidant activity, the antiproliferative effect, and the acute toxicity of the methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis roots. Materials and Methods. Phytochemical composition of the methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis roots were studied using qualitative and quantitative methods, the antioxidant activity was evaluated using DPPH assay, the antiproliferative effects against human cancer cell lines (T-24, HT-29, and Hep G-2) was assessed using WST1 assay, and the acute toxicity was carried out orally by gavage of single dose 2000 mg/kg to mice for 14 days. Results. The two studied plants have different classes of secondary metabolites. The concentrations of the total polyphenolic content of A. baetica and A. paucinervis root extracts were estimated at 360 ± 20 mg GAE/g and 280 ± 27 mg GAE/g, respectively. The total flavonoids content of A. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts were estimated at 35 ± 8 mg QE/g and 235 ± 7 mg QE/g, respectively. A. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts exhibited promising DPPH activity with IC50 values of 150 ± 8 μg/ml and 160 ± 10 μg/ml, respectively. The extracts exerted also antiproliferative effects on all tested cancer cell lines (T-24, HT-29, and Hep G-2) with IC50 values ranging from 6 ± 1 μg/ml to 380 ± 7 μg/ml. Regarding the results of acute toxicity study, no signs of toxicities nor mortalities were observed on the oral treated mice with 2000 mg/kg of the two investigated exacts. Conclusion. The methanolic extracts of A. baetica and A. paucinervis possess several phytochemicals that exhibited promising free radical scavenging activity and antiproliferative effects.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Sine antiquities, plants have played an important role in our daily lives as they have been a source of food, fiber, and other necessary needs. Among these resources, medicinal plants have been widely used to protect humans against serious diseases [1, 2]. They are considered as a natural reservoir of biologically active substances with different biological properties. These bioactive natural remedies are increasingly used to treat a wide variety of clinical diseases because of its lower side effects [3].Currently, therapeutic chemistry has great interests in health care, with almost 80% of the population throughout the world using medicinal plants [4]. As a result, several research studies have paid more attention to medicinal plants as an important source of chemical compounds and bioactive substances with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer activity [5]. Some of the natural substances have been recognized as key players in pharmacology for the development of new drugs used in the treatment of cancer [6]. Scientific research on plants used in traditional medicine is widely required to ensure safety control and to avoid potential risks related to the ingestion of toxic herbs. Data collected from in vitro and in vivo toxicological studies of herbs are needed to consolidate the scientific validity of herbs [7].Aristolochia species have been widely used in Moroccan traditional medicine to treat various diseases for many years ago [7]. Nowadays, some of these plants are used to treat cancer [8], digestive diseases [9], rheumatic, abortifacient, and cutaneous neoplasm. They are also used as a stimulant of blood circulatory as anti-inflammatory and antiseptic [10].The present work was conducted to determine the scientific basis of traditional uses ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis. It aims at the investigation of the phytochemical composition, the antioxidant activity, the antiproliferative effect, and the acute toxicity of the methanolic extract of the two reported plants.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Material

A. baetica was collected in January 2016 from the surrounding region of Chefchaouen (Moroccan city). A. paucinervis was harvested in December 2016 at 30 km East of Khouribga (Moroccan city). The collected plants were identified by Dr. Mohammed Fanane (Department of Botany, Scientific Institute of Rabat, Morocco). A voucher specimen has been deposited in the herbarium under 1045 and 1046, respectively. The roots of both, A. baetica and A. paucinervis were initially cleaned, washed with water, dried in the shade, and chopped into small pieces using an electric mixer.


### 2.2. Preparation of Plant Extract

25 g of dried powder ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots was extracted using Soxhlet at 40°C for 2 h using methanol as an extraction solvent. The obtained extract was centrifuged, filtered, and evaporated at low pressure (40°C) to remove the excess solvent in order to obtain 3 g of crude extract.


### 2.3. Phytochemical Screening

The plant materials were subjected to qualitative phytochemical careening in order to qualitatively determine some type of interesting constituents that could be responsible for biological activities. Alkaloids, flavonoids, polyphenols, anthraquinones, saponins, tannins, sterols, and terpenes were the major checked groups using standard methods as reported in earlier literature with slight modifications [11].


### 2.4. Identification of Bioactive Constituents by GC-MS

GC-MS analysis of the methanolic extracts of the studied plants were performed using a Claus 580 Gas Chromatography according to the following acquisition parameters: oven: initial temp 50°C for 2 min, ramp 11°C/min to 200°C, hold 0 min, ramp 6°C/min to 240°C, hold 1 min, split = 10 : 1, carrier gas = He, solvent delay = 4.00 min, transfer temp = 280°C, source temp = 250°C, scan: 40 to 450 Da, and column 30.0 m × 250μm.


### 2.5. Total Polyphenolic Content

The total phenolic content ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method and gallic acid as standard. Aliquots of test samples (250 μL) of a diluted solution of extracts were mixed with 1.5 mL of sodium carbonate solution (7.5%). After 5 min, 1.25 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, reveal the composition of this reagent (0.2 N), was added to the mixture, allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min in darkness. The reading was carried out versus a blank at 765 nm. The calibration curve was plotted using gallic acid as a positive control. The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg GA E/g) [12].


### 2.6. Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was identified using the aluminum chloride assay (colorimetry). Each diluted sample was mixed with 1.5 mL of AlCl3 (2%) and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. The absorbance was read spectrophotometrically against a blank at 415 nm. Quercetin was used as a reference standard compound. The calibration curve was plotted using quercetin as a standard compound. The results were expressed as quercetin equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg QE/g) [13].


### 2.7. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was evaluated in vitro using DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay according to the method described in previous literature [14]. About 1 ml of methanolic extract at different concentrations ranging from 100 μg/ml to 900 μg/ml was mixed with 500 μl of methanolic solution of DPPH (0.005%). After 30 min of incubation in darkness at room temperature, the absorbance (A) of the control and samples was read spectrophotometrically at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The free radical scavenging activity was calculated in percentage as follows:(1)Free radical scavenging activity%=Acontrol–AsampleAcontrol∗100.IC50 was determined graphically from the graph plotting inhibition percentage against extract [15].


### 2.8.In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

#### 2.8.1. Cell Culture and Treatment

Three Cancerous cell lines were selected to be tested including human bladder cancer cell lines (T-24). The latter were cultured in McCoys5a; in parallel, the liver cancer cell lines (Hep G-2) and human colon cancer cell lines (HT-29) were cultured in DMEM media added with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, antibiotics (1%), and glutamine (1%). The cancerous cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator set at 5% CO2. The cultures were left until they formed a monolayer on the flask. The cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized in order to be detached and then adding a complete medium to inhibit the reaction.Antiproliferative activity of the methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis against T-24, Hep G-2, and HT-29 cell lines was assessed on the basis of mitochondrial metabolic activity using WST1 (disodium mono{4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-tetrazol]-3-ium-5-yl]benzene-1,3 disulfonate}). During the exponential growth of the tested cells in 96-well microplates at a density of 8000 cells per well, the seeding medium was removed and replaced by extracts prepared in medium to concentration up (0 to 400 μg/mL). WST1 assay was performed in triplicate, and the mitomycin was used parallelly as positive control. After 72 h of incubation, briefly 100 μl of the medium was removed from each well and 10 μl of WST1 solution was added to cultured cells. The plate was incubated again for 4 h at 37°C in a dark wet atmosphere. The absorbance was read at 590 nm using a Wallac Victor X3 multiwell spectrophotometer.The percentage of cytotoxicity was defined according to the following formula:(2)cell death%=control OD−sample ODcontrol OD∗100.The percentage of viability was calculated according to the following equation:(3)cell viability%=100−%cell death.IC50 value (the inhibition concentration required to reduce 50% of cell proliferation) was determined graphically on the basis of regression analysis performed on WST1 assay viability [16].


### 2.9. Animal Material

Adult Swiss albino mice weighing approximately 25 g were used for acute toxicity. The mice were purchased from the animal colony of Pasteur Institute (Casablanca, Morocco). All animals were kept in polypropylene cages. The animals were acclimatized for one week under laboratory conditions of regular light/dark cycles (12/12 h) and temperature (24 ± 2°C). The animals had free access to tap water and a normal pellet diet [17].


### 2.10. Study of Acute Toxicity

Nine male adult mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups of three mice each. The animals were grouped in polypropylene cages and fasted for 12 h. The organic extract of the studied plants was administered to each treatment group once as follows:Control group—treated with vehicle (distilled water)Group A—A. baetica extract (2000 mg/kg)Group B—A. paucinervis extract (2000 mg/kg)Animals were observed for signs of toxicity, mortalities, changes in general behavior, and physical appearance. This study was conducted according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines No. 425 [18].


### 2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data for each test are the average of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analysis of difference was performed using ANOVA. The means were compared using the Holm–Sidak Test. Statisticallyp value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate significance.


## 2.1. Plant Material

A. baetica was collected in January 2016 from the surrounding region of Chefchaouen (Moroccan city). A. paucinervis was harvested in December 2016 at 30 km East of Khouribga (Moroccan city). The collected plants were identified by Dr. Mohammed Fanane (Department of Botany, Scientific Institute of Rabat, Morocco). A voucher specimen has been deposited in the herbarium under 1045 and 1046, respectively. The roots of both, A. baetica and A. paucinervis were initially cleaned, washed with water, dried in the shade, and chopped into small pieces using an electric mixer.


## 2.2. Preparation of Plant Extract

25 g of dried powder ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots was extracted using Soxhlet at 40°C for 2 h using methanol as an extraction solvent. The obtained extract was centrifuged, filtered, and evaporated at low pressure (40°C) to remove the excess solvent in order to obtain 3 g of crude extract.


## 2.3. Phytochemical Screening

The plant materials were subjected to qualitative phytochemical careening in order to qualitatively determine some type of interesting constituents that could be responsible for biological activities. Alkaloids, flavonoids, polyphenols, anthraquinones, saponins, tannins, sterols, and terpenes were the major checked groups using standard methods as reported in earlier literature with slight modifications [11].


## 2.4. Identification of Bioactive Constituents by GC-MS

GC-MS analysis of the methanolic extracts of the studied plants were performed using a Claus 580 Gas Chromatography according to the following acquisition parameters: oven: initial temp 50°C for 2 min, ramp 11°C/min to 200°C, hold 0 min, ramp 6°C/min to 240°C, hold 1 min, split = 10 : 1, carrier gas = He, solvent delay = 4.00 min, transfer temp = 280°C, source temp = 250°C, scan: 40 to 450 Da, and column 30.0 m × 250μm.


## 2.5. Total Polyphenolic Content

The total phenolic content ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was determined using the Folin–Ciocalteu method and gallic acid as standard. Aliquots of test samples (250 μL) of a diluted solution of extracts were mixed with 1.5 mL of sodium carbonate solution (7.5%). After 5 min, 1.25 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, reveal the composition of this reagent (0.2 N), was added to the mixture, allowed to stand at room temperature for 30 min in darkness. The reading was carried out versus a blank at 765 nm. The calibration curve was plotted using gallic acid as a positive control. The results were expressed as gallic acid equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg GA E/g) [12].


## 2.6. Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was identified using the aluminum chloride assay (colorimetry). Each diluted sample was mixed with 1.5 mL of AlCl3 (2%) and incubated for 60 min at room temperature. The absorbance was read spectrophotometrically against a blank at 415 nm. Quercetin was used as a reference standard compound. The calibration curve was plotted using quercetin as a standard compound. The results were expressed as quercetin equivalent per gram of dry extract (mg QE/g) [13].


## 2.7. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts was evaluated in vitro using DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) assay according to the method described in previous literature [14]. About 1 ml of methanolic extract at different concentrations ranging from 100 μg/ml to 900 μg/ml was mixed with 500 μl of methanolic solution of DPPH (0.005%). After 30 min of incubation in darkness at room temperature, the absorbance (A) of the control and samples was read spectrophotometrically at 517 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The free radical scavenging activity was calculated in percentage as follows:(1)Free radical scavenging activity%=Acontrol–AsampleAcontrol∗100.IC50 was determined graphically from the graph plotting inhibition percentage against extract [15].


## 2.8.In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

### 2.8.1. Cell Culture and Treatment

Three Cancerous cell lines were selected to be tested including human bladder cancer cell lines (T-24). The latter were cultured in McCoys5a; in parallel, the liver cancer cell lines (Hep G-2) and human colon cancer cell lines (HT-29) were cultured in DMEM media added with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, antibiotics (1%), and glutamine (1%). The cancerous cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator set at 5% CO2. The cultures were left until they formed a monolayer on the flask. The cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized in order to be detached and then adding a complete medium to inhibit the reaction.Antiproliferative activity of the methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis against T-24, Hep G-2, and HT-29 cell lines was assessed on the basis of mitochondrial metabolic activity using WST1 (disodium mono{4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-tetrazol]-3-ium-5-yl]benzene-1,3 disulfonate}). During the exponential growth of the tested cells in 96-well microplates at a density of 8000 cells per well, the seeding medium was removed and replaced by extracts prepared in medium to concentration up (0 to 400 μg/mL). WST1 assay was performed in triplicate, and the mitomycin was used parallelly as positive control. After 72 h of incubation, briefly 100 μl of the medium was removed from each well and 10 μl of WST1 solution was added to cultured cells. The plate was incubated again for 4 h at 37°C in a dark wet atmosphere. The absorbance was read at 590 nm using a Wallac Victor X3 multiwell spectrophotometer.The percentage of cytotoxicity was defined according to the following formula:(2)cell death%=control OD−sample ODcontrol OD∗100.The percentage of viability was calculated according to the following equation:(3)cell viability%=100−%cell death.IC50 value (the inhibition concentration required to reduce 50% of cell proliferation) was determined graphically on the basis of regression analysis performed on WST1 assay viability [16].


## 2.8.1. Cell Culture and Treatment

Three Cancerous cell lines were selected to be tested including human bladder cancer cell lines (T-24). The latter were cultured in McCoys5a; in parallel, the liver cancer cell lines (Hep G-2) and human colon cancer cell lines (HT-29) were cultured in DMEM media added with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, antibiotics (1%), and glutamine (1%). The cancerous cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator set at 5% CO2. The cultures were left until they formed a monolayer on the flask. The cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized in order to be detached and then adding a complete medium to inhibit the reaction.Antiproliferative activity of the methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis against T-24, Hep G-2, and HT-29 cell lines was assessed on the basis of mitochondrial metabolic activity using WST1 (disodium mono{4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-tetrazol]-3-ium-5-yl]benzene-1,3 disulfonate}). During the exponential growth of the tested cells in 96-well microplates at a density of 8000 cells per well, the seeding medium was removed and replaced by extracts prepared in medium to concentration up (0 to 400 μg/mL). WST1 assay was performed in triplicate, and the mitomycin was used parallelly as positive control. After 72 h of incubation, briefly 100 μl of the medium was removed from each well and 10 μl of WST1 solution was added to cultured cells. The plate was incubated again for 4 h at 37°C in a dark wet atmosphere. The absorbance was read at 590 nm using a Wallac Victor X3 multiwell spectrophotometer.The percentage of cytotoxicity was defined according to the following formula:(2)cell death%=control OD−sample ODcontrol OD∗100.The percentage of viability was calculated according to the following equation:(3)cell viability%=100−%cell death.IC50 value (the inhibition concentration required to reduce 50% of cell proliferation) was determined graphically on the basis of regression analysis performed on WST1 assay viability [16].


## 2.9. Animal Material

Adult Swiss albino mice weighing approximately 25 g were used for acute toxicity. The mice were purchased from the animal colony of Pasteur Institute (Casablanca, Morocco). All animals were kept in polypropylene cages. The animals were acclimatized for one week under laboratory conditions of regular light/dark cycles (12/12 h) and temperature (24 ± 2°C). The animals had free access to tap water and a normal pellet diet [17].


## 2.10. Study of Acute Toxicity

Nine male adult mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups of three mice each. The animals were grouped in polypropylene cages and fasted for 12 h. The organic extract of the studied plants was administered to each treatment group once as follows:Control group—treated with vehicle (distilled water)Group A—A. baetica extract (2000 mg/kg)Group B—A. paucinervis extract (2000 mg/kg)Animals were observed for signs of toxicity, mortalities, changes in general behavior, and physical appearance. This study was conducted according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines No. 425 [18].


## 2.11. Statistical Analysis

Data for each test are the average of triplicate experiments ± standard deviation (SD), and statistical analysis of difference was performed using ANOVA. The means were compared using the Holm–Sidak Test. Statisticallyp value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate significance.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Phytochemical Screening

The phytochemical screening ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots revealed the presence of flavonoids, polyphenols, alkaloids, tannins, saponins, and the absence of anthraquinone, sterols, and terpenes (Table 1).Table 1
Qualitative phytochemical screening ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots.
Phytoconstituents
A. baetica roots
A. paucinervis roots
Polyphenols
++
+++
Alkaloids
+++
++
Flavonoids
+++
++
Anthraquinone
−
−
Sterols and terpenes
−
−
Saponins
+
+
Tannins
+++
++
+++: strong positive test; ++: positive test; +: low positive test; −: negative test.


### 3.2. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS analysis ofA. baetica methanolic extract revealed ten compounds: pseudocumene, tetracyclo [3.3.1.0.1(3,9)]decan-10-one, p-vinylguaiacol, 2-epi-trans-β-caryophyllene, guaia-6,9-diene, pacifigorgiol, maaliol, methylglucose, isoaromadendrene epoxide, and trans-sinapyl alcohol (Figure 1; Table 2).Figure 1
GC-MS spectral chromatogram ofA. baetica methanolic extract.Table 2
Phytocomponents identified from methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots using GC-MS.
S. No
Retention time (min)
Compound name
Molecular formula
1
6,249
Pseudocumene
C9H12
2
9,917
Tetracyclo [3.3.1.0.1(3,9)] decan-10-one
C10H12O
3
11,118
p-Vinylguaiacol
C9H10O2
4
12,902
2-epi-trans-β-Caryophyllene
C15H24
5
13,294
Guaia-6,9-diene
C15H24
6
13,76
Pacifigorgiol
C15H26O
7
14,103
Maaliol
C15H26O
8
15,11
Methylglucose
C7H14O6
9
15,163
Isoaromadendrene epoxide
C15H24O
10
18,466
trans-Sinapyl alcohol
C17H24O9RegardingA. paucinervis methanolic extract, the GC-MS identified seven compounds: dihydro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl 2(3H)-furanone, mesitylene, dodecane, maaliol, 2-palmitoylglycerol, dioctyl terephthalate, phthalic acid, and di(2 propylpentyl) ester (Figure 2; Table 3).Figure 2
GC-MS spectral chromatogram ofA. paucinervis methanolic extract.Table 3
Phytocomponents identified from methanolic extract ofA. paucinervis roots using GC-MS.
S. No
Retention time (min)
Compound name
Molecular formula
10
4,893
Dihydro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl 2(3H) furanone
C11H16O4
17
6,246
Mesitylene
C9H12
22
9,467
Dodecane
C12H26
26
14,095
Maaliol
C15H26O
35
18,087
2-Palmitoylglycerol
C19H38O4
39
19,447
Dioctyl terephthalate
C24H38O4
41
19,712
Phthalic acid, di(2 propylpentyl) ester
C24H38O4


### 3.3. Total Polyphenolic and Flavonoid Contents

Calculations of total polyphenolic content in the organic extract of the studied plants were based on the equation obtained from the standard gallic acid graph. Total polyphenolic contents of 360 ± 20 mg GAE/g and 280 ± 27 mg GAE/g were found inA. baetica and A. paucinervis methanolic extracts, respectively. Regarding the total flavonoid content calculation, the formula obtained from the standard quercetin graph was applied. Total flavonoid content of 35 ± 8 mg QE/g was obtained with A. baetica extract and 235 ± 7 mg QE/g with A. paucinervis extract.


### 3.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis methanolic extracts was evaluated by the DPPH free radical scavenging test. As shown in Figure 3, both extracts exhibit promising antioxidant activity in a concentration-dependent manner.Figure 3
DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis.The IC50 value (the inhibitory concentration of extract required to inhibit 50% of the initial DPPH free radical) of the plant extracts and ascorbic acid as a positive control was determined graphically from the graph of DPPH inhibition percentage. The results of IC50 values of methanolic extract of A. baetica, A. paucinervis, and ascorbic acid were determined approximately at 150 ± 8 μg/ml, 160 ± 10 μg/ml, and 25 ± 3 μg/ml, respectively. In order to perform the comparison, the IC50 values of DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis showed a significant difference compared to DPPH IC50 value of ascorbic acid as a standard (p∗∗∗<0.05).


### 3.5.In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

The methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis was investigated for potential antiproliferative effects on T-24, Hep G-2 and HT-29 human cancerous cell lines using WST1 assay. Figures 4 and 5 show important antiproliferative effects induced by the investigated extracts on the treated cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner.Figure 4
Cell viability after 72 h of treatment with the methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots.Figure 5
Cell viability after 72 h of treatment with the methanolic extract ofA. paucinervis roots.Regarding data presented in Figure4, the methanolic extract of A. baetica roots induced antiproliferative effects on T-24 and HT-29 cell lines with IC50 48 ± 5 μg/ml and 100 ± 10 μg/ml, respectively. Both T-24 and HT-29 cell lines were more sensitive to the effect of extract of A. baetica than Hep G-2 cell lines with IC50 380 ± 7 μg/ml. There is a significant difference between IC50 value induced by the methanolic extract on all treated cancerous cells (p∗∗<0.05).In Figure5, the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots exerts antiproliferative effects on Hep G-2 and HT-29 cell lines with IC50 approximately 52 ± 5 μg/ml and 30 ± 6 μg/ml, respectively. The T-24 cell lines were more sensitive to organic extract of A. paucinervis roots than Hep G-2 and HT-29 with IC50 6 ± 1 μg/ml. To perform the comparison, there is a significant difference between IC50 value induced by the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots on the treated cells (T-24, HT-29, and Hep G-2) (p∗∗<0.05).


### 3.6. Acute Toxicity Studies

The findings of acute toxicity study showed the absence of mortalities and signs of toxicity on the oral treated mice with both 2000 mg/kg of the methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots and 2000 mg/kg methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots. Slight changes in general behavior like running after the gavage compared to the control group were observed.


## 3.1. Phytochemical Screening

The phytochemical screening ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots revealed the presence of flavonoids, polyphenols, alkaloids, tannins, saponins, and the absence of anthraquinone, sterols, and terpenes (Table 1).Table 1
Qualitative phytochemical screening ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis roots.
Phytoconstituents
A. baetica roots
A. paucinervis roots
Polyphenols
++
+++
Alkaloids
+++
++
Flavonoids
+++
++
Anthraquinone
−
−
Sterols and terpenes
−
−
Saponins
+
+
Tannins
+++
++
+++: strong positive test; ++: positive test; +: low positive test; −: negative test.


## 3.2. GC-MS Analysis

The GC-MS analysis ofA. baetica methanolic extract revealed ten compounds: pseudocumene, tetracyclo [3.3.1.0.1(3,9)]decan-10-one, p-vinylguaiacol, 2-epi-trans-β-caryophyllene, guaia-6,9-diene, pacifigorgiol, maaliol, methylglucose, isoaromadendrene epoxide, and trans-sinapyl alcohol (Figure 1; Table 2).Figure 1
GC-MS spectral chromatogram ofA. baetica methanolic extract.Table 2
Phytocomponents identified from methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots using GC-MS.
S. No
Retention time (min)
Compound name
Molecular formula
1
6,249
Pseudocumene
C9H12
2
9,917
Tetracyclo [3.3.1.0.1(3,9)] decan-10-one
C10H12O
3
11,118
p-Vinylguaiacol
C9H10O2
4
12,902
2-epi-trans-β-Caryophyllene
C15H24
5
13,294
Guaia-6,9-diene
C15H24
6
13,76
Pacifigorgiol
C15H26O
7
14,103
Maaliol
C15H26O
8
15,11
Methylglucose
C7H14O6
9
15,163
Isoaromadendrene epoxide
C15H24O
10
18,466
trans-Sinapyl alcohol
C17H24O9RegardingA. paucinervis methanolic extract, the GC-MS identified seven compounds: dihydro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl 2(3H)-furanone, mesitylene, dodecane, maaliol, 2-palmitoylglycerol, dioctyl terephthalate, phthalic acid, and di(2 propylpentyl) ester (Figure 2; Table 3).Figure 2
GC-MS spectral chromatogram ofA. paucinervis methanolic extract.Table 3
Phytocomponents identified from methanolic extract ofA. paucinervis roots using GC-MS.
S. No
Retention time (min)
Compound name
Molecular formula
10
4,893
Dihydro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl 2(3H) furanone
C11H16O4
17
6,246
Mesitylene
C9H12
22
9,467
Dodecane
C12H26
26
14,095
Maaliol
C15H26O
35
18,087
2-Palmitoylglycerol
C19H38O4
39
19,447
Dioctyl terephthalate
C24H38O4
41
19,712
Phthalic acid, di(2 propylpentyl) ester
C24H38O4


## 3.3. Total Polyphenolic and Flavonoid Contents

Calculations of total polyphenolic content in the organic extract of the studied plants were based on the equation obtained from the standard gallic acid graph. Total polyphenolic contents of 360 ± 20 mg GAE/g and 280 ± 27 mg GAE/g were found inA. baetica and A. paucinervis methanolic extracts, respectively. Regarding the total flavonoid content calculation, the formula obtained from the standard quercetin graph was applied. Total flavonoid content of 35 ± 8 mg QE/g was obtained with A. baetica extract and 235 ± 7 mg QE/g with A. paucinervis extract.


## 3.4. Antioxidant Activity

The antioxidant activity ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis methanolic extracts was evaluated by the DPPH free radical scavenging test. As shown in Figure 3, both extracts exhibit promising antioxidant activity in a concentration-dependent manner.Figure 3
DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis.The IC50 value (the inhibitory concentration of extract required to inhibit 50% of the initial DPPH free radical) of the plant extracts and ascorbic acid as a positive control was determined graphically from the graph of DPPH inhibition percentage. The results of IC50 values of methanolic extract of A. baetica, A. paucinervis, and ascorbic acid were determined approximately at 150 ± 8 μg/ml, 160 ± 10 μg/ml, and 25 ± 3 μg/ml, respectively. In order to perform the comparison, the IC50 values of DPPH radical scavenging activity of methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis showed a significant difference compared to DPPH IC50 value of ascorbic acid as a standard (p∗∗∗<0.05).


## 3.5.In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

The methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis was investigated for potential antiproliferative effects on T-24, Hep G-2 and HT-29 human cancerous cell lines using WST1 assay. Figures 4 and 5 show important antiproliferative effects induced by the investigated extracts on the treated cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner.Figure 4
Cell viability after 72 h of treatment with the methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots.Figure 5
Cell viability after 72 h of treatment with the methanolic extract ofA. paucinervis roots.Regarding data presented in Figure4, the methanolic extract of A. baetica roots induced antiproliferative effects on T-24 and HT-29 cell lines with IC50 48 ± 5 μg/ml and 100 ± 10 μg/ml, respectively. Both T-24 and HT-29 cell lines were more sensitive to the effect of extract of A. baetica than Hep G-2 cell lines with IC50 380 ± 7 μg/ml. There is a significant difference between IC50 value induced by the methanolic extract on all treated cancerous cells (p∗∗<0.05).In Figure5, the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots exerts antiproliferative effects on Hep G-2 and HT-29 cell lines with IC50 approximately 52 ± 5 μg/ml and 30 ± 6 μg/ml, respectively. The T-24 cell lines were more sensitive to organic extract of A. paucinervis roots than Hep G-2 and HT-29 with IC50 6 ± 1 μg/ml. To perform the comparison, there is a significant difference between IC50 value induced by the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots on the treated cells (T-24, HT-29, and Hep G-2) (p∗∗<0.05).


## 3.6. Acute Toxicity Studies

The findings of acute toxicity study showed the absence of mortalities and signs of toxicity on the oral treated mice with both 2000 mg/kg of the methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots and 2000 mg/kg methanolic extract of A. paucinervis roots. Slight changes in general behavior like running after the gavage compared to the control group were observed.


## 4. Discussion

Since prehistoric times, the medicinal plants have played a central role in the prevention and the treatment of various diseases [19]. In the current work, we decided to scientifically highlight the traditional uses of Moroccan A. baetica and A. paucinervis roots, such as to investigate their chemical profile, antioxidant activity, antiproliferative effect, and acute toxicity.The phytochemical profile of the two studied plants in this work revealed the presence of alkaloids polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins, saponins, and the absence of anthraquinone, sterols, and terpenes. These results were in accordance with those reported in earlier reports which showed that the phytochemical screening ofA. longa and A. baetica roots revealed the presence of phenols, flavonoids, saponins, and the absence of anthraquinones, sterols, and triterpenes [17, 20]. The qualitative test of the aerial parts of A. indica showed positive tests for terpenes, saponins, tannins, and flavonoids [21].Plants with high amounts of phytoconstituents such as flavonoids and polyphenols are reported to exhibit antioxidant properties [16]. In the current research work, the total polyphenolic content was quantified using the Folin–Ciocalteau assay [22]. The rate of total polyphenolic content of methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis roots was estimated at 360 ± 20 mg GAE/g and 280 ± 27 mg GAE/g, respectively. The total flavonoids content of A. baetica and A. paucinervis extracts were estimated at 35 ± 8 mg QE/g and 235 ± 7 mg QE/g. These findings were partly comparable to those reported in previous literature [21], in which it was reported that the total polyphenolic and flavonoids content shown in aqueous extract of A. indica was 25.11 ± 0.18 GAE/g and 30.41 ± 0.19 QE/g, respectively.In the present investigation, a proposing DPPH radical scavenging activity was noticed for the methanolic extract ofA. baetica and A. paucinervis with IC50 values of 150 ± 8 μg/ml and 160 ± 10 μg/ml, respectively. This property could be attributed to presence of interesting total polyphenolic content [23]. The antioxidant activity of polyphenols is due to their redox properties which could play a central role in capturing and neutralizing free radicals in order to prevent their harmful effects [24]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous data were available for A. baetica and A. paucinervis antioxidant activity. Thus, other plants of genus Aristolochia were phytochemically and biologically evaluated to perform comparison. The obtained results were in confirmation with early reports concerning DPPH radical scavenging activity of A. longa organic extract which showed a DPPH IC50 value of IC50 equal 125.40 ± 2.40 μg/mL [25].Regarding the antiproliferative activity, the results showed that the methanolic extract ofA. baetica roots exhibited a high antiproliferative effect on T-24, HT-29, and Hep G-2 cell lines with IC50 approximately of 48 ± 5 μg/ml, 100 ± 10 μg/ml, and 380 ± 7 μg/ml, respectively. On the other hand, the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis showed IC50 values of 52 ± 5 μg/ml, 30 ± 6 μg/ml, and 6 ± 1 μg/ml on Hep G-2, HT-29, and T-24, respectively. To perform the comparison, it was reported that the antiproliferative effect of A. baetica organic extracts was estimated at IC50: 216.06 ± 15 μg/mL [8]. The remarkable antiproliferative effect resulted in methanolic extracts of the studied plants was in accordance with previous data [26], in which it was reported that the IC50 value of A. longa aqueous extract against human cancer lines was determined at 15,63 μg/ml.Dysregulation of apoptosis is one of the most important factors intervened in cancer treatment [27]. The control of cancer growth still related to the ability of cancer cells to undergo apoptosis [28]. The mechanism by which genus Aristolochia could induce cell death was investigated in previous literature [29], it was reported that the aqueous extract of A. longa induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial intrinsic pathway in BL41. This mechanism could involve in our treated cell lines with methanolic extracts of the studied plants. The phytochemical screening revealed the presence of polyphenols, alkaloids, flavonoids, and tannins. On the other hand, the pharmacological activities of plants rely on their chemical compounds, and thus, the antiproliferative activity of the studied plants is associated with the detected compounds [30]. The detected flavonoids could be the responsible compounds for the antiproliferative activity [31].Mass spectrometry plays a crucial role in the development of the organic field because of its efficiency in the qualitative and quantitative determination of organic molecules. Gas chromatography coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS) permits a mixture of small molecules rather than organic constituent of low molecular weight to be analyzed [32]. Ten compounds namely pseudocumene, tetracyclo [3.3.1.0.1(3,9)] decan-10-one, p-vinylguaiacol, 2-epi-trans-β-caryophyllene, guaia-6,9-diene, pacifigorgiol, maaliol, methylglucose, isoaromadendrene epoxide, and trans-sinapyl alcohol were identified in methanolic extract of A. baetica using GC-MS. On the other hand, seven compounds such as dihydro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl 2(3H)-furanone, mesitylene, dodecane, maaliol, 2-palmitoylglycerol, dioctyl terephthalate, phthalic acid, and di(2 propylpentyl) ester were detected from the methanolic extract of A. baetica roots.The pharmacological and biological properties of the studied plants in the current work seem to be attributed to the identified compounds. This can be a result of the action of a single molecule or by a synergy between all these molecules without excluding the potentiation effects. As an example, pacifigorgiol found in the methanolic extract ofA. baetica was reported in previous literature to exhibit antibacterial activities [33]. A cytotoxic effect against brine shrimp nauplii Artemia salina was attributed to dioctyl terephthalate detected in the methanolic extract of A. paucinervis [34].The acute toxicity of the investigated methanolic in this work was useful to provide information concerning the safety control for potential uses in single administration. No clinical signs nor mortalities occurred in animals treated orally with 2000 mg/kg of the two plant extracts compared to control groups. Therefore, the predicted LD50 of the studied plant extracts would be higher than 2000 mg/kg. On the other hand, these extracts seem to be safe for animals with oral administration of single doses up to 2000 mg/kg under the conditions of acute toxicity. The present results were consolidated to other researches which showed the safety of single administered doses to mice (lower than 4 g/kg) [17, 35]. In the same way, the methanolic extract of A. baetica and A. paucinervis roots was not toxic with single doses according to the scale of Viala [32]. However, the genus Aristolochia exhibits high toxicity when ingested for a long time with repeated doses [36, 37].


## 5. Conclusion

Phytochemical profile of bothA. baetica and A. paucinervis was useful to provide information on the potential of these plants as a promising source of secondary metabolites, hence, encouraging their natural potential as a source of various therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer.



---

*Source: 9710876-2019-12-03.xml*