# Assemblage Characteristics and Habitat Specificity of Carabid Beetles in a Japanese Alpine-Subalpine Zone

Authors: Shinichi Hiramatsu; Nisikawa Usio
Journal: Psyche
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

In lowland areas of the world and high-altitude European mountains, the species compositions, body sizes, and wing forms of carabid beetles are known to change according to vegetation structures. However, little is known regarding the assemblage structure and habitat associations of carabid beetles in Japanese alpine-subalpine areas. We surveyed carabid beetles in four habitats (snow beds, alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields) in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan, Japan. We surveyed carabid beetles six times between mid-July and late September. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) revealed three distinct carabid beetle assemblages in snow beds and alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields. The carabid beetle assemblages in the four habitats consisted predominantly of small and/or wingless species with differential spatiotemporal variability in abundance. Biota-environment (BIO-ENV) analyses showed that the percentage coverage byPinus scrub, soil water content, and ground surface temperature were among the most significant variables affecting carabid beetle compositions. Given their small sizes and reduced wings, which are characteristic traits for limited mobility, and high-level habitat specificity, carabid beetles in the alpine-subalpine zone may serve as an important target group to monitor the impacts of global environmental change on mountain ecosystems.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Mountain areas are generally characterized by harsh and unpredictable environments with low temperatures, strong winds, abundant snow, and changeable climates [1]. These characteristics are reflected in microclimatic differences in snow cover, temperature, soil water content, wind velocity, and substrate composition. Consequently, a great variety of habitats exists within small areas in mountainous areas, and the organisms therein are characterized by specific adaptations to the different microclimates [2]. In insects, small body size and brachyptery (reduced wings) are common morphological characteristics in high mountain areas [1, 3, 4].Coleoptera are among the most numerically dominant mountain insects in many parts of the world [1]. Carabid beetles (Carabidae) constitute more than half of the total species of Coleoptera on high mountains [1]. To date, numerous studies have shown that carabid beetle richness and/or assemblage composition change along altitudinal gradients [5–7] and/or with vegetation type [8–11]. For example, on Mt. Sobaeksan, Korea, carabid beetle assemblages were classified into low- and high-altitude groups [6]. In the Italian Alps, the species richness, activity level, and species traits (i.e., wing forms, geographical ranges, diets, and reproduction rhythms) of carabid beetles showed no or only weak correlation with altitude but were closely associated with habitat type [11]. Although there have been numerous studies on the habitat associations of carabid beetles in high-altitude mountain areas in Europe [12–14], such associations have not been reported from above the tree line in Japanese mountains.The growing literature from lowland and mountain areas suggests that the abundance, species richness, and species composition of carabid beetles have been shown to change across habitats characterized by different vegetation structures, such as the presence of a tree canopy or forest type [15–17]. Furthermore, the body size and wing form of carabid beetles are known to change with habitat structure: stable habitats are generally represented by large and wingless species, whereas unstable or fragmented habitats are mainly represented by small and winged species [18–21]. In addition, carabid beetle richness and composition are also affected by microclimatic factors, such as soil water content and ground surface temperature [22–24]. Because of their close associations with vegetation structure undergoing natural and anthropogenic changes and the microclimatic variations associated with such changes [25–28], carabid beetles have been suggested to serve as useful bioindicators of environmental change [28, 29].In recent years, global climate change has threatened mountain habitats and their organisms in many parts of the world. For example, in European mountains and the Andes, the distributions of vascular plants and carabid beetles have shifted toward higher altitudes [13, 30, 31]. In northern Japan, phenological mismatches are evident between the flowering seasons of alpine plants and the levels of activity of their bumblebee pollinators [32]. As soil moisture decreases and the annual growing period expands due to the recent acceleration in snowmelt time, Japanese alpine meadows have become invaded by dwarf shrubs and bamboos that, in turn, trigger desiccation of temporary wetland habitats [33, 34]. Therefore, identifying habitat associations in a dominant insect group would be an important step toward understanding the consequences of global climate change in high mountain areas.The objectives of this study were to investigate the assemblage characteristics and habitat associations of carabid beetles in the alpine-subalpine zone of a Japanese mountain. We tested two hypotheses. First, we tested whether the carabid beetles on a high mountain were associated with specific habitats, characterized by variation in vegetation structure and microclimate. Specifically, we hypothesized that the presence ofPinus scrub and changes in snowmelt along with associated microclimatic factors would determine the carabid beetle composition in the high mountain area. Second, we tested whether carabid species in the high mountain area exhibit specific body size or wing forms that are representative of harsh environments. Based on the literature [1, 3, 4, 14], we expected that body size would be small and wingless species would dominate the high mountain area numerically. We compared our results with studies performed in lowland areas on the same mountain. Our study is the first to document the habitat associations and morphological traits of carabid beetles from a high-altitude Japanese mountain.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Area

We conducted field surveys in the upper alpine-subalpine zone (altitude 2070–2600 m) on Mt. Hakusan in Ishikawa Prefecture, central Japan (36°09′N, 136°46′E; Figure1). The Mt. Hakusan area was designated a Biosphere Reserve by the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere program in 1980, with an extended area additionally registered in 2016 [35]. The study sites were located in the core (protected) area of the Biosphere Reserve. According to the meteorological data at Murodo-daira station near the study sites (see Figure 1), the mean annual air temperature was 0°C in 2014 (range −20°C to 20°C) [36]; most of the study sites are covered with snow from November until June.Figure 1
Maps showing the location of the study area and the 11 study sites encompassing four habitats in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan (Geospatial Information Authority scale of 1/50,000; Japan Topographic Map). Murodo-daira indicates the location of the meteorological station.We selected two or three sites in each of four habitats for a total of 11 sites. To eliminate the influence of adjacent habitats, each site was selected from the center of the respective habitat type, with each site located more than 200 m from the others. We categorized the habitats with reference to a vegetation map of 1/25,000 [37] and via field surveys. The four habitats consisted of snow beds, alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields (Figure 1). The snow beds are generally covered with snow until mid-July, after which the sites become dominated by dwarf scrub (Phyllodoce aleutica,Vaccinium uliginosum, andGeum pentapetalum). The alpine meadows are generally covered with snow until late June, and they become temporary wetlands in July. Later, these locations gradually dry out, and the sites subsequently become dominated by herbaceous plants (Carex blepharicarpa andNephrophyllidium crista-galli). ThePinus scrub is covered byPinus pumila about 2 m in height throughout the year. Fell-fields are exposed habitats that are very windy in winter; they support little vegetation other than sporadic patches of a dwarf shrub (Empetrum nigrumvar.japonicum andP. pumila).


### 2.2. Carabid Beetle Sampling

We sampled carabid beetles six times on July 15 and 24, August 13 and 27, and September 11 and 23 in 2014 using baited pitfall traps made of polypropylene cups (diameter 9 cm, depth 7 cm). Sushi vinegar and powdered silkworm are baits commonly used in Japan to collect carabid beetles [38, 39]. However, these two types of bait attract different carabid species [40]. We used both sushi vinegar and powdered silkworm to maximize the collecting efficiency of carabid beetles in an alpine area, where catches of carabid beetles are often small.At each site, we placed 20 traps about 2 m apart along an arbitrarily designated 38 m line. We alternated sushi vinegar (10 mL/trap) and powdered silkworm (10 mL/trap) traps along the 38 m line. Therefore, there were 10 traps of each type at each site. We set up all of the traps from 8:00 to 12:00 of the same day. The following morning, 24 hours after the start of trapping, we emptied the traps and collected the carabid beetles. In the laboratory, we identified the carabid beetles to species using taxonomic keys [41–43]. For each site, we calculated the total number of carabid beetles captured in the 20 cups using the two different baits. We used digital calipers to measure body length (from the tip of the mandible to the posterior end of the elytra) of all collected individuals (excluding damaged samples) for nonabundant species (<40 individuals/species). For abundant species (≥40 individuals/species), we measured at least 65% of all collected individuals. Using data from equal numbers of males and females, we calculated the mean body length of each carabid beetle species. We classified all carabid beetles into one of three body size categories: small (body length < 10 mm), medium (10–20 mm), and large (>20 mm) (based on previous studies [24, 44]). We also classified all carabid beetles as either macropterous (with fully developed hindwings), brachypterous (with very short or rudimentary hindwings), or apterous (with no hindwings) based on Jelaska and Durbešić [45]. Because no polymorphic species (sensu [45]) were identified in this study, we excluded this category from the wing form classification.


### 2.3. Environmental Variables

We selected six environmental variables that might affect the species richness, abundance, and assemblage composition of carabid beetles on Mt. Hakusan: soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover.Using a portable soil water sensor (TDR-341F; Fujiwara Scientific Company, Tsukuba, Japan), we measured soil water content by inserting the probe to 5 cm depth from the soil surface. At each site, we arbitrarily took 10 readings to determine the mean soil water content. Subsequently, we placed two parallel 5 m tape measures horizontally (5 m apart) along the slope near the center of each site. We divided each 5 m line into 10 equidistant points. We used a ruler to determine the mean substrate size at 20 locations at each site. Prior to starting the first carabid beetle sampling, we placed a data logger (HOBO TidbiT v2; Onset Computer, Bourne, MA, USA) at the center of each site. Based on hourly temperature data collected from 13:00 to 12:00 the following day, we calculated the mean ground surface temperature and diurnal temperature range of the ground surface (the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures). We visually estimated the percentage coverage of all vegetation andPinus pumila based on two 5 m2 quadrats (10 m apart) that were placed near the center of each site.At each sampling session, we measured soil water content, mean ground surface temperature, the temperature range, and the percentage coverage by vegetation. We recorded mean substrate size and percentage coverage byPinus scrub only once (at the beginning of the study), because these parameters were expected to change little during the study period.


### 2.4. Data Analyses

We used factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or one-way ANOVA to explore differences in six environmental variables (soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover) among the four habitats. For diurnal temperature range and vegetation cover, we used the Box-Cox transformation to meet the normality assumption of the model residuals. For four environmental variables (soil water content, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and vegetation cover), we treated habitat and day as fixed factors and day as a repeated measure. We considered day to be a fixed factor because the choice of sampling day was arbitrary. Using Mauchly’s test of sphericity, we checked the sphericity assumption of within-subject effects (day, habitat × day) for the four environmental variables; all environmental variables satisfied the sphericity assumption (all P>0.15). When we analyzed the mean substrate size, we used one-way ANOVA with habitat as a fixed factor, because the variable was measured only once. Because there was zero variance in some habitats, the difference inPinus cover among the four habitats could not be tested using factorial ANOVA.We used generalized linear model (GLM) analyses to identify differences in the total carabid beetle abundance and species richness among the four habitats. We treated habitat and day as fixed factors and day as a repeated measure. We used a negative binomial model (log link) for total carabid abundance and a Poisson model (log link) for species richness data. When a habitat effect or habitat × day interaction was statistically significant (P<0.05), we applied the sequential Bonferroni correction to the P values of post hoc pairwise tests.To explore differences in species compositions among the four habitats, we subjected all daily data and the pooled data from the six samplings to nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). NMDS is an ordination technique that depicts the configuration of samples in a specified number of dimensions based on the dissimilarity matrix and iterative algorithm [46]. Unlike eigenvalue-eigenvector techniques, such as principal component analysis, NMDS makes few assumptions about the nature of the data. Therefore, NMDS is a preferred ordination technique in ecological studies, in which data often show nonnormal distribution or nonlinear relationships between samples. Prior to NMDS analyses, we transformed the abundance data using fourth-root transformations [46]. In addition, we added a dummy variable because the data contained values of zero [46]. We drew two-dimensional ordination diagrams using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index as the distance matrix between study sites. To visualize the habitat associations of carabid beetles in the high mountain area, we added vector plots of the carabid beetle species based on Mantel matrix correlations using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R). For clarity, only carabid beetle species with R≥0.6 are shown in the 2D-NMDS plots. We then performed an analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) to explore the statistical significance of observed differences in species compositions among the four habitats. ANOSIM is a nonparametric permutation procedure that is applied to the rank similarity matrix (based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index in our case) underlying the ordination of samples [46]. We set the number of permutations to 999. As the statistical significance of post hoc pairwise ANOSIM tests can be biased by global testing, we used sample and pairwise statistics (R) to examine dissimilarities in carabid beetle compositions between different pairs of habitats.We used the biota-environment (BIO-ENV) analysis to identify environmental variables that best explained the carabid beetle compositions. The BIO-ENV analysis uses all available environmental variables to identify the combination that best explains patterns evident in the biological data. In the BIO-ENV procedure, correlations between the dissimilarity matrices of species (based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) and environmental variables (based on Euclidean distance) are calculated [46]. To calculate these correlations, we used R (Mantel matrix correlations using the Pearson correlation coefficient). We included six environmental variables (soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover) as predictors. Before the BIO-ENV analysis, we fourth-root transformed carabid beetle abundance data and standardized all environmental variables [46]. We set the number of randomizations to 999 to determine the combinations of environmental variables that best explained carabid beetle similarity or dissimilarity between sites.We performed the repeated measures ANOVA and GLMs in SPSS ver. 21 (IBM, New York, USA) and the NMDS, ANOSIM, and BIO-ENV analyses in Primer ver. 7 (PRIMER-E, Auckland, New Zealand).


## 2.1. Study Area

We conducted field surveys in the upper alpine-subalpine zone (altitude 2070–2600 m) on Mt. Hakusan in Ishikawa Prefecture, central Japan (36°09′N, 136°46′E; Figure1). The Mt. Hakusan area was designated a Biosphere Reserve by the UNESCO Man and the Biosphere program in 1980, with an extended area additionally registered in 2016 [35]. The study sites were located in the core (protected) area of the Biosphere Reserve. According to the meteorological data at Murodo-daira station near the study sites (see Figure 1), the mean annual air temperature was 0°C in 2014 (range −20°C to 20°C) [36]; most of the study sites are covered with snow from November until June.Figure 1
Maps showing the location of the study area and the 11 study sites encompassing four habitats in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan (Geospatial Information Authority scale of 1/50,000; Japan Topographic Map). Murodo-daira indicates the location of the meteorological station.We selected two or three sites in each of four habitats for a total of 11 sites. To eliminate the influence of adjacent habitats, each site was selected from the center of the respective habitat type, with each site located more than 200 m from the others. We categorized the habitats with reference to a vegetation map of 1/25,000 [37] and via field surveys. The four habitats consisted of snow beds, alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields (Figure 1). The snow beds are generally covered with snow until mid-July, after which the sites become dominated by dwarf scrub (Phyllodoce aleutica,Vaccinium uliginosum, andGeum pentapetalum). The alpine meadows are generally covered with snow until late June, and they become temporary wetlands in July. Later, these locations gradually dry out, and the sites subsequently become dominated by herbaceous plants (Carex blepharicarpa andNephrophyllidium crista-galli). ThePinus scrub is covered byPinus pumila about 2 m in height throughout the year. Fell-fields are exposed habitats that are very windy in winter; they support little vegetation other than sporadic patches of a dwarf shrub (Empetrum nigrumvar.japonicum andP. pumila).


## 2.2. Carabid Beetle Sampling

We sampled carabid beetles six times on July 15 and 24, August 13 and 27, and September 11 and 23 in 2014 using baited pitfall traps made of polypropylene cups (diameter 9 cm, depth 7 cm). Sushi vinegar and powdered silkworm are baits commonly used in Japan to collect carabid beetles [38, 39]. However, these two types of bait attract different carabid species [40]. We used both sushi vinegar and powdered silkworm to maximize the collecting efficiency of carabid beetles in an alpine area, where catches of carabid beetles are often small.At each site, we placed 20 traps about 2 m apart along an arbitrarily designated 38 m line. We alternated sushi vinegar (10 mL/trap) and powdered silkworm (10 mL/trap) traps along the 38 m line. Therefore, there were 10 traps of each type at each site. We set up all of the traps from 8:00 to 12:00 of the same day. The following morning, 24 hours after the start of trapping, we emptied the traps and collected the carabid beetles. In the laboratory, we identified the carabid beetles to species using taxonomic keys [41–43]. For each site, we calculated the total number of carabid beetles captured in the 20 cups using the two different baits. We used digital calipers to measure body length (from the tip of the mandible to the posterior end of the elytra) of all collected individuals (excluding damaged samples) for nonabundant species (<40 individuals/species). For abundant species (≥40 individuals/species), we measured at least 65% of all collected individuals. Using data from equal numbers of males and females, we calculated the mean body length of each carabid beetle species. We classified all carabid beetles into one of three body size categories: small (body length < 10 mm), medium (10–20 mm), and large (>20 mm) (based on previous studies [24, 44]). We also classified all carabid beetles as either macropterous (with fully developed hindwings), brachypterous (with very short or rudimentary hindwings), or apterous (with no hindwings) based on Jelaska and Durbešić [45]. Because no polymorphic species (sensu [45]) were identified in this study, we excluded this category from the wing form classification.


## 2.3. Environmental Variables

We selected six environmental variables that might affect the species richness, abundance, and assemblage composition of carabid beetles on Mt. Hakusan: soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover.Using a portable soil water sensor (TDR-341F; Fujiwara Scientific Company, Tsukuba, Japan), we measured soil water content by inserting the probe to 5 cm depth from the soil surface. At each site, we arbitrarily took 10 readings to determine the mean soil water content. Subsequently, we placed two parallel 5 m tape measures horizontally (5 m apart) along the slope near the center of each site. We divided each 5 m line into 10 equidistant points. We used a ruler to determine the mean substrate size at 20 locations at each site. Prior to starting the first carabid beetle sampling, we placed a data logger (HOBO TidbiT v2; Onset Computer, Bourne, MA, USA) at the center of each site. Based on hourly temperature data collected from 13:00 to 12:00 the following day, we calculated the mean ground surface temperature and diurnal temperature range of the ground surface (the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures). We visually estimated the percentage coverage of all vegetation andPinus pumila based on two 5 m2 quadrats (10 m apart) that were placed near the center of each site.At each sampling session, we measured soil water content, mean ground surface temperature, the temperature range, and the percentage coverage by vegetation. We recorded mean substrate size and percentage coverage byPinus scrub only once (at the beginning of the study), because these parameters were expected to change little during the study period.


## 2.4. Data Analyses

We used factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or one-way ANOVA to explore differences in six environmental variables (soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover) among the four habitats. For diurnal temperature range and vegetation cover, we used the Box-Cox transformation to meet the normality assumption of the model residuals. For four environmental variables (soil water content, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and vegetation cover), we treated habitat and day as fixed factors and day as a repeated measure. We considered day to be a fixed factor because the choice of sampling day was arbitrary. Using Mauchly’s test of sphericity, we checked the sphericity assumption of within-subject effects (day, habitat × day) for the four environmental variables; all environmental variables satisfied the sphericity assumption (all P>0.15). When we analyzed the mean substrate size, we used one-way ANOVA with habitat as a fixed factor, because the variable was measured only once. Because there was zero variance in some habitats, the difference inPinus cover among the four habitats could not be tested using factorial ANOVA.We used generalized linear model (GLM) analyses to identify differences in the total carabid beetle abundance and species richness among the four habitats. We treated habitat and day as fixed factors and day as a repeated measure. We used a negative binomial model (log link) for total carabid abundance and a Poisson model (log link) for species richness data. When a habitat effect or habitat × day interaction was statistically significant (P<0.05), we applied the sequential Bonferroni correction to the P values of post hoc pairwise tests.To explore differences in species compositions among the four habitats, we subjected all daily data and the pooled data from the six samplings to nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). NMDS is an ordination technique that depicts the configuration of samples in a specified number of dimensions based on the dissimilarity matrix and iterative algorithm [46]. Unlike eigenvalue-eigenvector techniques, such as principal component analysis, NMDS makes few assumptions about the nature of the data. Therefore, NMDS is a preferred ordination technique in ecological studies, in which data often show nonnormal distribution or nonlinear relationships between samples. Prior to NMDS analyses, we transformed the abundance data using fourth-root transformations [46]. In addition, we added a dummy variable because the data contained values of zero [46]. We drew two-dimensional ordination diagrams using the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index as the distance matrix between study sites. To visualize the habitat associations of carabid beetles in the high mountain area, we added vector plots of the carabid beetle species based on Mantel matrix correlations using the Pearson correlation coefficient (R). For clarity, only carabid beetle species with R≥0.6 are shown in the 2D-NMDS plots. We then performed an analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) to explore the statistical significance of observed differences in species compositions among the four habitats. ANOSIM is a nonparametric permutation procedure that is applied to the rank similarity matrix (based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index in our case) underlying the ordination of samples [46]. We set the number of permutations to 999. As the statistical significance of post hoc pairwise ANOSIM tests can be biased by global testing, we used sample and pairwise statistics (R) to examine dissimilarities in carabid beetle compositions between different pairs of habitats.We used the biota-environment (BIO-ENV) analysis to identify environmental variables that best explained the carabid beetle compositions. The BIO-ENV analysis uses all available environmental variables to identify the combination that best explains patterns evident in the biological data. In the BIO-ENV procedure, correlations between the dissimilarity matrices of species (based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) and environmental variables (based on Euclidean distance) are calculated [46]. To calculate these correlations, we used R (Mantel matrix correlations using the Pearson correlation coefficient). We included six environmental variables (soil water content, mean substrate size, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, vegetation cover, andPinus cover) as predictors. Before the BIO-ENV analysis, we fourth-root transformed carabid beetle abundance data and standardized all environmental variables [46]. We set the number of randomizations to 999 to determine the combinations of environmental variables that best explained carabid beetle similarity or dissimilarity between sites.We performed the repeated measures ANOVA and GLMs in SPSS ver. 21 (IBM, New York, USA) and the NMDS, ANOSIM, and BIO-ENV analyses in Primer ver. 7 (PRIMER-E, Auckland, New Zealand).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Differences in Environmental Variables among the Four Habitats

Of the six environmental variables, the soil water content, mean substrate size, diurnal temperature range, and percentage coverage by vegetation differed significantly among the four habitats (Habitat: allP<0.05; Figure 2; Table S1). ANOVA could not be performed forPinuscover, but this variable also clearly differed among the four habitats. A significant habitat × day interaction was evident in the ground surface temperature of the four habitats, but no overall habitat effect was apparent; that is, the ground surface temperature differed among the four habitats on some days, but such differences were not consistently observed throughout the study period.Figure 2
Soil water content (a), ground surface temperature (b), diurnal temperature range (c), vegetation cover (d), mean substrate size (e), andPinus cover (f) in four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan. The P values are based on the results of repeated measures ANOVA (soil water content, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and vegetation cover) and one-way ANOVA (mean substrate size) testing for differences in environmental variables among the four habitats. The difference inPinus cover among the four habitats could not be tested using factorial ANOVA. Data are presented as means ± 1 SE.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)Overall, snow beds were characterized by relatively high soil water content, large mean substrate size, high mean ground surface temperature, large diurnal temperature range, and high percentage coverage by vegetation (especially on August 13 and thereafter (Figure2; Table S1)). Alpine meadows were similar to snow beds but had higher soil water content, smaller mean substrate size, and lower diurnal temperature range.Pinus scrub areas were characterized by relatively low soil water content, small mean substrate size, low mean ground surface temperature, small diurnal temperature range, and extensive vegetation cover (dominated byPinus scrub). Fell-fields were characterized by low soil water content, large mean substrate size, high mean ground surface temperature, high diurnal temperature range, and sparse vegetation cover.


### 3.2. Carabid Beetles

We collected 997 carabid beetles of 23 species (Table1). All collected individuals were adults; no larvae were collected. The carabid beetle assemblages in the four habitats were numerically dominated by seven species:Bembidion sp.,Platynus sp.,Leptocarabus arboreus,Colpodes xestus,Pterostichus janoi,Platynus kitanoi, andPterostichus honshuensis, which constituted 91% of the total carabid beetle abundance during the six sampling periods. The abundances of the remaining 16 carabid beetle species were very low, with only 1–16 individuals found during the six sampling periods. The number of species identified at each site on each sampling day was between two and seven (Table S2).Table 1
Total and measured sample numbers, mean body lengths (±SDs), size classes, and wing forms of carabid beetles in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan.
Species Total samples (number) Measured samples (number) Mean body length ± SD (mm) Size class Wing form Leptocarabus arboreus 102 80 22.2 ± 0.88 L ap Leptocarabus procerulus 2 2 28.1 ± 0.00 L ap Leistus subaeneus 9 8 8.7 ± 0.08 S ap Nippononebria pusilla 16 14 8.2 ± 0.41 S br Nebria sadona 3 3 12.0 ± 0.13 M ap Nebria reflexa 3 2 11.2 ± 0.00 M br Trechiama lewisi 3 2 7.2 ± 0.48 S ap Trechus sp. 10 10 3.6 ± 0.26 S ap Bembidion fujiyamai 15 14 4.4 ± 0.27 S ma Bembidionsp. 459 369 4.6 ± 0.34 S br Diplous depressus 1 1 12.3 M ma Apatrobus hasemiya 2 2 8.3 ± 0.00 S br Platynus kitanoi 46 44 6.3 ± 0.34 S br Platynussp. 131 88 6.3 ± 0.48 S ma Colpodes xestus 80 60 10.3 ± 0.53 M ap Trigonognatha aurescens 10 10 16.8 ± 0.20 M ap Pterostichus honshuensis 45 36 10.8 ± 0.46 M br Pterostichus janoi 47 40 11.6 ± 0.44 M ap Pristosia aeneola 1 1 12.8 M ap Synuchus takeuchii 7 7 8.1 ± 0.32 S ap Trephionus kinoshitai 2 2 8.9 ± 0.33 S ap Harpalus fuliginosus 2 2 9.2 ± 0.15 S ma Trichotichnussp. 1 1 10.4 M br S, <10 mm; M, 10–20 mm; L, >20 mm; ma, macropterous; br, brachypterous; ap, apterous.The mean body length of the 23 carabid beetle species ranged from 3.6 mm (Trechus sp.) to 28.1 mm(Leptocarabus procerulus) (Table 1). In all, 12 of the 23 collected species were <10 mm in mean body length. Only two species ofLeptocarabus were >20 mm in mean body length.Of the 23 carabid beetle species identified in the study, only four species (Bembidion fujiyamai,Diplous depressus,Platynus sp., andHarpalus fuliginosus) were macropterous, and the remaining 19 species were brachypterous or apterous (Table 1). All macropterous species were recorded from non-Pinus scrub habitats.GLM did not reveal a significant habitat × day interaction in the total carabid beetle abundance (F15,14=1.63, P=0.184; Figure 3(a)). However, a significant habitat effect was apparent for the total carabid beetle abundance (F3,37=3.58, P=0.023). Subsequent post hoc tests revealed that the total carabid beetle abundance differed significantly between fell-fields andPinus scrub (P=0.021) but not between the remaining habitat combinations (all P>0.26). By contrast, neither a habitat × day interaction (F15,13=0.69, P=0.757) nor a habitat effect (F3,39=0.66, P=0.583) was significant for carabid species richness (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
Total abundance (a) and species richness (b) of carabid beetles in the four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan.P values for the effects of habitat, day, and habitat × day interaction are based on negative binomial (for total abundance) and Poisson (for species richness) generalized linear models (GLMs). Data are presented as means ± 1 SE.
(a) (b)Total carabid beetle abundance was highest on July 15, followed by July 24, and it declined thereafter (Figure3(a)). The carabid beetles collected on July 15 and 24 constituted 82% of all carabid beetles collected in the study period. There were large spatial and temporal variations in carabid beetle abundance both among and within the four habitats. In snow beds and alpine meadows, carabid beetle abundance peaked on July 15 and declined dramatically after this date (Figure 3(a), Table S2). The rapid decline in total carabid beetle abundance in snow beds and alpine meadows from July 15 to August 13, in particular, was mainly due to two dominant species (Bembidion sp. andPlatynus sp.), which together constituted approximately 90% of total carabid beetle abundance on the respective days in each habitat (Table S2). Likewise, in fell-fields, total carabid beetle abundance decreased from July 24 to August 13 with less temporal variation. Conversely, carabid beetle abundance inPinus scrub showed less variation over time during the same summer period.ANOSIM analyses revealed significant differences in carabid beetle compositions among the four habitats on July 15 and 24, August 13, and September 23 (significance levels < 5.0%), while marginally significant differences were evident on August 27 and September 11 (significance levels 5.0–6.6%) (Table2). Post hoc pairwise ANOSIM analyses revealed that the carabid beetle compositions on July 15 and 24 differed among snow beds, alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields (R≥0.778), but the differences between snow beds and alpine meadows were small on these dates (R=-0.250 to 0.167). The 2D-NMDS ordination diagrams showed that, on July 15, the snow beds-alpine meadows were represented byBembidion sp.,Trechiama lewisi,Pterostichus honshuensis, andPlatynus sp.; thePinus scrub was represented byPterostichus janoi,Trigonognatha aurescens,C. xestus, andL.arboreus; and the fell-fields were represented byNippononebria pusilla (Figure 4). On July 24, the carabid beetle assemblages in the four habitats were similar to those on July 15 except that the snow beds-alpine meadows were no longer represented byT. lewisi; thePinus scrub was also represented byLeistus subaeneus andP. kitanoi, together withP. janoi,C. xestus, andL. arboreus; and the fell-fields were represented byTrechus sp. rather thanN. pusilla. The carabid beetle compositions over the entire sampling period (i.e., the combined temporal data) reflected the compositions on the two days in July. On August 13, the differences in carabid beetle compositions betweenPinus scrub and alpine meadows (R=0.250) and fell-fields (R=0.111) were less than those on July dates, whereas the difference between snow beds and alpine meadows had become relatively high (R=0.667). On September 23, the differences in carabid beetle compositions resembled those on the July dates, except that the degree of dissimilarity between snow beds and fell-fields was less (R=-0.148). On both August 13 and September 23, the representative carabid beetle compositions of the respective habitats (as revealed by 2D-NMDS ordination diagrams) were ambiguous, except that thePinus scrub was represented byLeistus subaeneus,P. kitanoi, andP. janoi on September 23.Table 2
Global test data and pairwise statistics derived by one-way analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) that explored differences in carabid beetle assemblages among the four habitats (six sampling dates) on Mt. Hakusan. All data were fourth-root transformed prior to ANOSIM analyses.R denotes the Pearson correlation coefficient. The symbol “–” indicates that the pairwise test was not performed because the result of the global test was not significant (≥5%).
Sampling day Global test Pairwise statistic(R) Sample statistic(R) Significancelevel (%) SB & AM SB & PS SB & FF AM &PS AM & FF PS & FF July 15 0.764 0.2 –0.250 1.000 0.815 1.000 1.000 0.778 July 24 0.929 0.1 0.167 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 August 13 0.564 0.2 0.667 0.574 0.944 0.250 0.917 0.111 August 27 0.320 6.6 – – – – – – September 11 0.333 5.0 – – – – – – September 23 0.409 2.2 −0.167 0.519 −0.148 1.000 1.000 1.000 Entire period 0.849 0.1 −0.250 1.000 0.852 1.000 1.000 0.963 SB, snow beds; AM, alpine meadows; PS,Pinus scrub; FF, fell-fields.Figure 4
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations based on the abundance of carabid beetles on July 15, July 24, September 23, and the entire period (pooled data) on Mt. Hakusan. Only carabid beetle species with a Pearson correlation coefficient ≥ 0.6 are shown in the graphs. Vectors indicate the species that contributed significantly to discriminate the carabid beetle assemblages among the four habitats, with long vectors indicating the species with high contributions. The 2D stress indicates the model fit.All carabid beetle size classes were found in all habitat types (see Figure5(a)). However, the carabid beetle assemblages of snow beds and alpine meadows consisted predominantly of small (Bembidion sp. andPlatynus sp.) and medium (P. honshuensis) species; that ofPinus scrub consisted principally of medium (C. xestus andP. janoi) and large (L. arboreus) species; and that of fell-fields consisted of small (Bembidionsp.), medium (C.xestus), and large (L. arboreus) species. Most representative carabid beetle species were brachypterous or apterous (see Figure 5(b)). The only exception was the macropterousPlatynus sp., which was a numerically dominant member of the snow bed-alpine meadow assemblage.Figure 5
The percentage contributions of (a) small (<10 mm), medium (10–20 mm), and large (>20 mm) carabid beetles and (b) macropterous, apterous, and brachypterous wing forms in the four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone (altitude 2070–2600 m) and three habitats in the deciduous forest zone (altitude 140–680 m) on Mt. Hakusan. The data for the deciduous forest zone are based on Hiramatsu [54].
(a) (b)BIO-ENV analyses revealed significant associations between carabid beetle compositions and six environmental variables on July 15 and 24, August 27, and September 23 (significance levels <5%; Table3). There was no significant association between carabid beetle compositions and environmental variables on August 13 and September 11 (significance levels >5%). On July 15, the combination of environmental variables that best explained the species compositions included soil water content and percentage coverage byPinus scrub. These two variables or one of these variables was also the principal predictor explaining carabid species compositions in the top five models on July 15. For July 24, the best set of predictors of carabid beetle composition included soil water content, ground surface temperature, and percentage coverage byPinus scrub. Combinations of two or more of these three predictors appeared in the top five models for July 24. On August 27, the best set of predictors included ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and the percentage coverage byPinus scrub. These three variables or combinations of two of these variables always appeared among the top five models explaining carabid beetle compositions for August 27. By contrast to July, soil water content was not included in the top five models for August 27. On September 23, the best set of predictors included the percentage coverage byPinus scrub. This variable always appeared among the top five models explaining carabid beetle composition for September 23. Overall, percentage coverage byPinus scrub was consistently among the most important predictors of carabid beetle compositions on Mt. Hakusan, whereas soil water content was an important predictor early in summer after snowmelt, and ground surface temperature and/or diurnal temperature range were important predictors thereafter.Table 3
Biota-environment (BIO-ENV) analyses identifying the best five sets of environmental predictors explaining carabid beetle compositions on Mt. Hakusan.R denotes the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Rank July 15 July 24 August 27 September 23 Significance level 0.1% Significance level 0.2% Significance level 0.2% Significance level 2.7% R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations 1 0.718 WaterPinus 0.726 WaterTemperaturePinus 0.604 TemperatureRangePinus 0.541 Pinus  2 0.680 WaterVegetationPinus 0.684 WaterPinus 0.566 SubstrateTemperatureRangePinus 0.541 SubstratePinus  3 0.640 WaterRangePinus 0.679 WaterTemperatureVegetationPinus 0.553 TemperatureRangeVariablePinus 0.534 WaterSubstratePinus  4 0.621 WaterTemperaturePinus 0.675 WaterSubstrateTemperaturePinus 0.540 TemperaturePinus 0.506 WaterPinus  5 0.616 WaterRangeVegetationPinus 0.661 WaterTemperatureRangePinus 0.529 SubstrateTemperatureRangeVegetationPinus 0.466 TemperaturePinus Water, soil water content. Substrate, substrate size. Temperature, mean ground surface temperature. Range, diurnal temperature range. Pinus, percentage coverage ofPinus scrub. Vegetation, percentage coverage by vegetation.


## 3.1. Differences in Environmental Variables among the Four Habitats

Of the six environmental variables, the soil water content, mean substrate size, diurnal temperature range, and percentage coverage by vegetation differed significantly among the four habitats (Habitat: allP<0.05; Figure 2; Table S1). ANOVA could not be performed forPinuscover, but this variable also clearly differed among the four habitats. A significant habitat × day interaction was evident in the ground surface temperature of the four habitats, but no overall habitat effect was apparent; that is, the ground surface temperature differed among the four habitats on some days, but such differences were not consistently observed throughout the study period.Figure 2
Soil water content (a), ground surface temperature (b), diurnal temperature range (c), vegetation cover (d), mean substrate size (e), andPinus cover (f) in four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan. The P values are based on the results of repeated measures ANOVA (soil water content, ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and vegetation cover) and one-way ANOVA (mean substrate size) testing for differences in environmental variables among the four habitats. The difference inPinus cover among the four habitats could not be tested using factorial ANOVA. Data are presented as means ± 1 SE.
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)Overall, snow beds were characterized by relatively high soil water content, large mean substrate size, high mean ground surface temperature, large diurnal temperature range, and high percentage coverage by vegetation (especially on August 13 and thereafter (Figure2; Table S1)). Alpine meadows were similar to snow beds but had higher soil water content, smaller mean substrate size, and lower diurnal temperature range.Pinus scrub areas were characterized by relatively low soil water content, small mean substrate size, low mean ground surface temperature, small diurnal temperature range, and extensive vegetation cover (dominated byPinus scrub). Fell-fields were characterized by low soil water content, large mean substrate size, high mean ground surface temperature, high diurnal temperature range, and sparse vegetation cover.


## 3.2. Carabid Beetles

We collected 997 carabid beetles of 23 species (Table1). All collected individuals were adults; no larvae were collected. The carabid beetle assemblages in the four habitats were numerically dominated by seven species:Bembidion sp.,Platynus sp.,Leptocarabus arboreus,Colpodes xestus,Pterostichus janoi,Platynus kitanoi, andPterostichus honshuensis, which constituted 91% of the total carabid beetle abundance during the six sampling periods. The abundances of the remaining 16 carabid beetle species were very low, with only 1–16 individuals found during the six sampling periods. The number of species identified at each site on each sampling day was between two and seven (Table S2).Table 1
Total and measured sample numbers, mean body lengths (±SDs), size classes, and wing forms of carabid beetles in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan in central Japan.
Species Total samples (number) Measured samples (number) Mean body length ± SD (mm) Size class Wing form Leptocarabus arboreus 102 80 22.2 ± 0.88 L ap Leptocarabus procerulus 2 2 28.1 ± 0.00 L ap Leistus subaeneus 9 8 8.7 ± 0.08 S ap Nippononebria pusilla 16 14 8.2 ± 0.41 S br Nebria sadona 3 3 12.0 ± 0.13 M ap Nebria reflexa 3 2 11.2 ± 0.00 M br Trechiama lewisi 3 2 7.2 ± 0.48 S ap Trechus sp. 10 10 3.6 ± 0.26 S ap Bembidion fujiyamai 15 14 4.4 ± 0.27 S ma Bembidionsp. 459 369 4.6 ± 0.34 S br Diplous depressus 1 1 12.3 M ma Apatrobus hasemiya 2 2 8.3 ± 0.00 S br Platynus kitanoi 46 44 6.3 ± 0.34 S br Platynussp. 131 88 6.3 ± 0.48 S ma Colpodes xestus 80 60 10.3 ± 0.53 M ap Trigonognatha aurescens 10 10 16.8 ± 0.20 M ap Pterostichus honshuensis 45 36 10.8 ± 0.46 M br Pterostichus janoi 47 40 11.6 ± 0.44 M ap Pristosia aeneola 1 1 12.8 M ap Synuchus takeuchii 7 7 8.1 ± 0.32 S ap Trephionus kinoshitai 2 2 8.9 ± 0.33 S ap Harpalus fuliginosus 2 2 9.2 ± 0.15 S ma Trichotichnussp. 1 1 10.4 M br S, <10 mm; M, 10–20 mm; L, >20 mm; ma, macropterous; br, brachypterous; ap, apterous.The mean body length of the 23 carabid beetle species ranged from 3.6 mm (Trechus sp.) to 28.1 mm(Leptocarabus procerulus) (Table 1). In all, 12 of the 23 collected species were <10 mm in mean body length. Only two species ofLeptocarabus were >20 mm in mean body length.Of the 23 carabid beetle species identified in the study, only four species (Bembidion fujiyamai,Diplous depressus,Platynus sp., andHarpalus fuliginosus) were macropterous, and the remaining 19 species were brachypterous or apterous (Table 1). All macropterous species were recorded from non-Pinus scrub habitats.GLM did not reveal a significant habitat × day interaction in the total carabid beetle abundance (F15,14=1.63, P=0.184; Figure 3(a)). However, a significant habitat effect was apparent for the total carabid beetle abundance (F3,37=3.58, P=0.023). Subsequent post hoc tests revealed that the total carabid beetle abundance differed significantly between fell-fields andPinus scrub (P=0.021) but not between the remaining habitat combinations (all P>0.26). By contrast, neither a habitat × day interaction (F15,13=0.69, P=0.757) nor a habitat effect (F3,39=0.66, P=0.583) was significant for carabid species richness (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
Total abundance (a) and species richness (b) of carabid beetles in the four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan.P values for the effects of habitat, day, and habitat × day interaction are based on negative binomial (for total abundance) and Poisson (for species richness) generalized linear models (GLMs). Data are presented as means ± 1 SE.
(a) (b)Total carabid beetle abundance was highest on July 15, followed by July 24, and it declined thereafter (Figure3(a)). The carabid beetles collected on July 15 and 24 constituted 82% of all carabid beetles collected in the study period. There were large spatial and temporal variations in carabid beetle abundance both among and within the four habitats. In snow beds and alpine meadows, carabid beetle abundance peaked on July 15 and declined dramatically after this date (Figure 3(a), Table S2). The rapid decline in total carabid beetle abundance in snow beds and alpine meadows from July 15 to August 13, in particular, was mainly due to two dominant species (Bembidion sp. andPlatynus sp.), which together constituted approximately 90% of total carabid beetle abundance on the respective days in each habitat (Table S2). Likewise, in fell-fields, total carabid beetle abundance decreased from July 24 to August 13 with less temporal variation. Conversely, carabid beetle abundance inPinus scrub showed less variation over time during the same summer period.ANOSIM analyses revealed significant differences in carabid beetle compositions among the four habitats on July 15 and 24, August 13, and September 23 (significance levels < 5.0%), while marginally significant differences were evident on August 27 and September 11 (significance levels 5.0–6.6%) (Table2). Post hoc pairwise ANOSIM analyses revealed that the carabid beetle compositions on July 15 and 24 differed among snow beds, alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields (R≥0.778), but the differences between snow beds and alpine meadows were small on these dates (R=-0.250 to 0.167). The 2D-NMDS ordination diagrams showed that, on July 15, the snow beds-alpine meadows were represented byBembidion sp.,Trechiama lewisi,Pterostichus honshuensis, andPlatynus sp.; thePinus scrub was represented byPterostichus janoi,Trigonognatha aurescens,C. xestus, andL.arboreus; and the fell-fields were represented byNippononebria pusilla (Figure 4). On July 24, the carabid beetle assemblages in the four habitats were similar to those on July 15 except that the snow beds-alpine meadows were no longer represented byT. lewisi; thePinus scrub was also represented byLeistus subaeneus andP. kitanoi, together withP. janoi,C. xestus, andL. arboreus; and the fell-fields were represented byTrechus sp. rather thanN. pusilla. The carabid beetle compositions over the entire sampling period (i.e., the combined temporal data) reflected the compositions on the two days in July. On August 13, the differences in carabid beetle compositions betweenPinus scrub and alpine meadows (R=0.250) and fell-fields (R=0.111) were less than those on July dates, whereas the difference between snow beds and alpine meadows had become relatively high (R=0.667). On September 23, the differences in carabid beetle compositions resembled those on the July dates, except that the degree of dissimilarity between snow beds and fell-fields was less (R=-0.148). On both August 13 and September 23, the representative carabid beetle compositions of the respective habitats (as revealed by 2D-NMDS ordination diagrams) were ambiguous, except that thePinus scrub was represented byLeistus subaeneus,P. kitanoi, andP. janoi on September 23.Table 2
Global test data and pairwise statistics derived by one-way analyses of similarities (ANOSIM) that explored differences in carabid beetle assemblages among the four habitats (six sampling dates) on Mt. Hakusan. All data were fourth-root transformed prior to ANOSIM analyses.R denotes the Pearson correlation coefficient. The symbol “–” indicates that the pairwise test was not performed because the result of the global test was not significant (≥5%).
Sampling day Global test Pairwise statistic(R) Sample statistic(R) Significancelevel (%) SB & AM SB & PS SB & FF AM &PS AM & FF PS & FF July 15 0.764 0.2 –0.250 1.000 0.815 1.000 1.000 0.778 July 24 0.929 0.1 0.167 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 August 13 0.564 0.2 0.667 0.574 0.944 0.250 0.917 0.111 August 27 0.320 6.6 – – – – – – September 11 0.333 5.0 – – – – – – September 23 0.409 2.2 −0.167 0.519 −0.148 1.000 1.000 1.000 Entire period 0.849 0.1 −0.250 1.000 0.852 1.000 1.000 0.963 SB, snow beds; AM, alpine meadows; PS,Pinus scrub; FF, fell-fields.Figure 4
Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations based on the abundance of carabid beetles on July 15, July 24, September 23, and the entire period (pooled data) on Mt. Hakusan. Only carabid beetle species with a Pearson correlation coefficient ≥ 0.6 are shown in the graphs. Vectors indicate the species that contributed significantly to discriminate the carabid beetle assemblages among the four habitats, with long vectors indicating the species with high contributions. The 2D stress indicates the model fit.All carabid beetle size classes were found in all habitat types (see Figure5(a)). However, the carabid beetle assemblages of snow beds and alpine meadows consisted predominantly of small (Bembidion sp. andPlatynus sp.) and medium (P. honshuensis) species; that ofPinus scrub consisted principally of medium (C. xestus andP. janoi) and large (L. arboreus) species; and that of fell-fields consisted of small (Bembidionsp.), medium (C.xestus), and large (L. arboreus) species. Most representative carabid beetle species were brachypterous or apterous (see Figure 5(b)). The only exception was the macropterousPlatynus sp., which was a numerically dominant member of the snow bed-alpine meadow assemblage.Figure 5
The percentage contributions of (a) small (<10 mm), medium (10–20 mm), and large (>20 mm) carabid beetles and (b) macropterous, apterous, and brachypterous wing forms in the four habitats of the alpine-subalpine zone (altitude 2070–2600 m) and three habitats in the deciduous forest zone (altitude 140–680 m) on Mt. Hakusan. The data for the deciduous forest zone are based on Hiramatsu [54].
(a) (b)BIO-ENV analyses revealed significant associations between carabid beetle compositions and six environmental variables on July 15 and 24, August 27, and September 23 (significance levels <5%; Table3). There was no significant association between carabid beetle compositions and environmental variables on August 13 and September 11 (significance levels >5%). On July 15, the combination of environmental variables that best explained the species compositions included soil water content and percentage coverage byPinus scrub. These two variables or one of these variables was also the principal predictor explaining carabid species compositions in the top five models on July 15. For July 24, the best set of predictors of carabid beetle composition included soil water content, ground surface temperature, and percentage coverage byPinus scrub. Combinations of two or more of these three predictors appeared in the top five models for July 24. On August 27, the best set of predictors included ground surface temperature, diurnal temperature range, and the percentage coverage byPinus scrub. These three variables or combinations of two of these variables always appeared among the top five models explaining carabid beetle compositions for August 27. By contrast to July, soil water content was not included in the top five models for August 27. On September 23, the best set of predictors included the percentage coverage byPinus scrub. This variable always appeared among the top five models explaining carabid beetle composition for September 23. Overall, percentage coverage byPinus scrub was consistently among the most important predictors of carabid beetle compositions on Mt. Hakusan, whereas soil water content was an important predictor early in summer after snowmelt, and ground surface temperature and/or diurnal temperature range were important predictors thereafter.Table 3
Biota-environment (BIO-ENV) analyses identifying the best five sets of environmental predictors explaining carabid beetle compositions on Mt. Hakusan.R denotes the Pearson correlation coefficient.
Rank July 15 July 24 August 27 September 23 Significance level 0.1% Significance level 0.2% Significance level 0.2% Significance level 2.7% R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations R Variablecombinations 1 0.718 WaterPinus 0.726 WaterTemperaturePinus 0.604 TemperatureRangePinus 0.541 Pinus  2 0.680 WaterVegetationPinus 0.684 WaterPinus 0.566 SubstrateTemperatureRangePinus 0.541 SubstratePinus  3 0.640 WaterRangePinus 0.679 WaterTemperatureVegetationPinus 0.553 TemperatureRangeVariablePinus 0.534 WaterSubstratePinus  4 0.621 WaterTemperaturePinus 0.675 WaterSubstrateTemperaturePinus 0.540 TemperaturePinus 0.506 WaterPinus  5 0.616 WaterRangeVegetationPinus 0.661 WaterTemperatureRangePinus 0.529 SubstrateTemperatureRangeVegetationPinus 0.466 TemperaturePinus Water, soil water content. Substrate, substrate size. Temperature, mean ground surface temperature. Range, diurnal temperature range. Pinus, percentage coverage ofPinus scrub. Vegetation, percentage coverage by vegetation.


## 4. Discussion

### 4.1. Characteristics of Carabid Beetle Assemblages in the Alpine-Subalpine Zone of Mt. Hakusan

Our study showed that the carabid beetles on Mt. Hakusan could be generally classified into three distinct assemblages: those of snow beds and alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields. These carabid beetle assemblages were generally characterized by depauperate fauna, with only two to three species numerically dominating each habitat. Our findings were consistent with those of previous studies documenting low carabid beetle richness in various mountainous areas in Japan, the European Alps, and South America [7, 11, 47, 48]. In lowland Japan, carabid beetles often comprise more than 10 species at a single site during their active season [49–51]. For example, 13–36 species of carabid beetles have been consistently identified from all sites ranging from forests to meadows to farmland at the foot of Mt. Hakusan below the current study sites [52–54].In addition, the carabid beetle assemblages at our study sites consisted predominantly of small species and individuals. While small carabid beetle species (<10 mm body length) constituted 52% of the total carabid beetle species in the present study, the percentage contributions of small carabid beetle species were shown to be less than 20% of the carabid beetle assemblages in lowland areas (altitude 140–680 m) including lawn, grassland, and forest at the foot of Mt. Hakusan below the current study sites [54] (Figure 5(a)). Even within the same carabid beetle species, the body size is known to decrease with increasing altitude. For example, Sota [55] found that the mean body length ofL.procerulus andL.arboreus decreased with increasing altitude. Nevertheless, in places where strong disturbances occur, the body size of carabid beetles may be small regardless of altitude. The prevalence of small carabid beetles at high altitude or in sites stressed by strong disturbances is probably due to depauperate food availability in these areas [18, 19, 56, 57]. In fact, as the isolation or fragmentation of forests progresses, the proportions of small carabid beetle species have been shown to increase [45]. Therefore, small body size is a characteristic of carabid beetles that inhabit severe environments.As reported in studies of alpine carabid beetles in Europe [11, 12, 14], there was a large proportion of short-winged carabid beetles at our study site. Although less than 30% of the carabid beetle species were brachypterous or apterous and are incapable of flying in the lowland areas (altitude 140–680 m) of Mt. Hakusan [54], 83% (19 of 23 species) were brachypterous or apterous in our study (Figure 5(b)). The growing literature from lowland areas suggests that stable habitats, such as large forested areas, are generally represented by brachypterous or apterous carabid beetle species [21, 44, 45, 57], whereas fragmented habitats, such as small patches of forest following deforestation, are generally represented by macropterous carabid species [45, 57, 58]. Herbaceous vegetation in high-altitude areas is usually in a stable, climax condition [59]; therefore, the carabid beetles living there may not need to move long distances. Alternatively, developing and maintaining full wings and flight muscles is energy intensive [3]. In harsh alpine-subalpine environments, carabid species may invest energy in survival rather than wing-development.Unlike the European Alps or Apennines, where the percentages of endemic carabid beetles are high [60], we did not find any endemic carabid species in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan; some carabid species are common in other alpine areas of central Japan. Similarly, no endemic vascular plants have been reported from Mt. Hakusan. The lack of endemic species on Mt. Hakusan is probably due to the new geographical background of this area. Mt. Hakusan is a volcano that formed 30,000 to 40,000 years ago (Late Pleistocene) [61]. By contrast, the European Alps were formed between 66 and 150 million years ago (Cretaceous period) [62]. Nevertheless, there are signs that endemic carabid species are evolving on Mt. Hakusan. For, example,L. arboreus, which is a representative carabid species in many habitats on Mt. Hakusan, is endemic at the subspecies level on Mt. Hakusan and neighboring mountains in central Japan [41].The carabid beetle fauna in the high mountain areas of Mt. Hakusan was more similar to that of the Japanese Alps than to that at the foot of the mountain. Between 14 and 15 carabid beetle species were previously recorded in studies conducted above 2000 m altitude in the Southern and Northern Japanese Alps [5, 63]. Of these, seven carabid beetles,C.exilis (synonym ofL. arboreus),N. pusilla,Nebria sadona,T. aurescens,P. janoi,Pristosia aeneola, andAgonum kitanoi (synonym ofP. kitanoi) from the Northern Japanese Alps, and four carabid beetles,L. arboreus,T. aurescens,Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (synonym ofP. honshuensis), andP. aeneola from the Southern Japanese Alps, were commonly identified in our study. Mt. Hakusan is geographically isolated from the closest mountain in the Japanese Alps, which lies at a linear distance of over 50 km. The 11 carabid beetle species commonly identified in high mountain areas on Mt. Hakusan and in the Japanese Alps have not been recorded from lowland areas [45, 46, 64]. During the ice age, many alpine plant species from northern areas colonized the mountains [65]. As the climate warmed, these plants were isolated as relics in areas at high elevation [65]. This scenario has also been reported for carabid beetles on high European mountains [59]. Likewise, alpine carabid beetles in Japan are probably distributed in isolated alpine habitats as relics.Overall, carabid beetles in the high mountain areas of Mt. Hakusan were characterized by depauperate fauna with a small number of dominant species, small body size, wingless species, and isolated populations, with some species that are commonly distributed in high mountain ecosystems of the Japanese Alps.


### 4.2. Effects of Habitat Type and Microclimate on Carabid Beetle Assemblages

The total carabid beetle abundance inPinus scrub was relatively constant during the study period. ThePinus scrub on Mt. Hakusan was associated with medium to large nonmacropterous species such asL. arboreus,L. subaeneus,T. aurescens,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, andP. janoi (Figure 4). Large body size and winglessness are typical of carabid beetles inhabiting stable habitats [66, 67]. In our study, large wingless species dominated thePinus habitat, probably becausePinus scrub is a stable habitat in high mountain areas.By contrast, the total carabid beetle abundance fluctuated markedly in the snow beds and alpine meadows (Figure3(a)), probably because of the major environmental changes associated with summertime snowmelt. Although many carabid beetles in lowland areas have distinct breeding seasons in spring or autumn, those in high-elevation areas lack distinct breeding seasons [11]. With the rapid disappearance of snowmelt water, carabid beetles inhabiting snow beds and alpine meadows may need to breed rapidly just after snowmelt; consequently, the activity levels of all carabid beetles in snow beds and alpine meadows may increase simultaneously following snowmelt.The snow beds and alpine meadows were also characterized by high soil water content (TableS1; Figure 2). In lowland areas, the soil water content is often among the most important factors influencing the assemblage compositions of carabid beetles [23, 68, 69]. Representative carabid beetles of snow beds and alpine meadows wereBembidion sp.,Platynus sp., andP. honshuensis, all of which are small to medium in size (Figure 5(a)). Because these three carabid beetle species have been mainly recorded from snow fields, alpine meadows, and/or river banks, but not fromPinus scrub on Mt. Hakusan [38, 70, 71], these species likely prefer moist alpine habitats. Moreover,Platynus sp. is macropterous and is thus expected to fly when dispersing. In lowland areas, many studies have found that small or macropterous carabid beetle species increased in number as the extent of disturbance rose [44, 66, 67]. Thus, snow beds and alpine meadows were probably represented by carabid beetles better adapted to inhabit unstable environments.In addition to large temporal variation in the total carabid beetle abundance, intersite variation in the total carabid beetle abundance was also prominent in snow beds and alpine meadows between July 15 and 24 (TableS2). Hiramatsu [72] found that carabid beetle abundance on snow beds changed markedly with the distance from the remaining snow. Therefore, the large intersite variation in carabid beetle abundance in snow beds and alpine meadows observed in our study was probably caused by differential snowmelt stages and the associated differences in microclimatic factors.Although fell-fields were represented by six species of carabid beetles, only two small or medium nonmacropterous species (N. pusilla andTrechus sp.) were unique to this habitat (Figure 4).Nippononebria pusilla andTrechus vicarius (synonym ofTrechus sp.) have been previously documented from the alpine-upper subalpine zone of the Northern Japanese Alps [5]. BecauseN. pusilla andTrechus sp. have not been recorded from the non-fell-field habitats of Mt. Hakusan [38, 70, 71], these two species might occur only in the high mountain fell-fields of central Japan. By contrast, the remaining four species also occurred in other habitats in the present study:Bembidion sp. in snow beds and alpine meadows,P. kitanoi andC. xestus inPinus scrub, andL. arboreus in all habitats (Figure 4). Some small- to medium-sized carabid beetles (Bembidion sp.,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, N. pusilla, andTrechus sp.) may use fell-fields as either temporary or permanent habitats. It is also possible that fell-fields serve as temporary habitats or dispersal corridors for mobile large carabid beetles (L. arboreus) that are predominantly found in other habitats.Temperature also significantly affects carabid beetle compositions [73–75]. In our study, the mean ground surface temperature was an important predictor of carabid beetle compositions in three of the five best BIO-ENV models for July 24 and in all five best models for August 27, while the diurnal temperature range was an important predictor in the fifth best model for July 24 and in three of the best five best models for August 27 (Table 3). Therefore, the mean ground surface temperature was probably more significant in terms of carabid beetle compositions during the period shortly after snowmelt than was the diurnal temperature range. In late August, after the snow has melted completely, both the mean ground surface temperature and diurnal temperature range may become important in determining carabid beetle compositions.


### 4.3. Carabid Beetles as an Important Target Group to Monitor Ecological Effects of Global Warming on Mountain Ecosystems

Over the past few decades, signs of global warming have been reported in mountainous areas worldwide [76–78]. Of the various mountain habitats, snow beds and alpine meadows are expected to be severely impacted by global warming due to reduced winter snowfall, accelerated snowmelt, and lower ground moisture content after snowmelt [33, 79]. Furthermore, alpine meadows will be progressively invaded bySasaspp. andP. pumila because of acceleration in the rate of desiccation [33, 80, 81]. Furthermore, ifP. pumila invades snow beds and alpine meadows, the carabid beetles therein may be replaced by carabids representative ofPinusscrub, such asL. subaeneus,T. aurescens,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, andP. janoi. In this study,Platynus sp. andP. honshuensiswere found almost exclusively in snow beds and alpine meadows; these species may be the first to disappear from the subalpine/alpine zone as global warming progresses. In addition, fell-fields constitute a critical mountain ecosystem that is found only in high mountain areas constantly exposed to strong winds. The minimum and maximum daily temperatures in high mountain areas have increased recently [82]. As global warming progresses, fell-fields may become hotter and dryer, and the interstitial spaces between rocks and underneath dwarf shrubs may no longer serve as refuges or temporary habitats for the carabid beetles that prefer such microhabitats. Consequently, carabid beetle species that are found exclusively in fell-fields, such asN. pusilla andTrechus sp., may disappear from high mountains.


## 4.1. Characteristics of Carabid Beetle Assemblages in the Alpine-Subalpine Zone of Mt. Hakusan

Our study showed that the carabid beetles on Mt. Hakusan could be generally classified into three distinct assemblages: those of snow beds and alpine meadows,Pinus scrub, and fell-fields. These carabid beetle assemblages were generally characterized by depauperate fauna, with only two to three species numerically dominating each habitat. Our findings were consistent with those of previous studies documenting low carabid beetle richness in various mountainous areas in Japan, the European Alps, and South America [7, 11, 47, 48]. In lowland Japan, carabid beetles often comprise more than 10 species at a single site during their active season [49–51]. For example, 13–36 species of carabid beetles have been consistently identified from all sites ranging from forests to meadows to farmland at the foot of Mt. Hakusan below the current study sites [52–54].In addition, the carabid beetle assemblages at our study sites consisted predominantly of small species and individuals. While small carabid beetle species (<10 mm body length) constituted 52% of the total carabid beetle species in the present study, the percentage contributions of small carabid beetle species were shown to be less than 20% of the carabid beetle assemblages in lowland areas (altitude 140–680 m) including lawn, grassland, and forest at the foot of Mt. Hakusan below the current study sites [54] (Figure 5(a)). Even within the same carabid beetle species, the body size is known to decrease with increasing altitude. For example, Sota [55] found that the mean body length ofL.procerulus andL.arboreus decreased with increasing altitude. Nevertheless, in places where strong disturbances occur, the body size of carabid beetles may be small regardless of altitude. The prevalence of small carabid beetles at high altitude or in sites stressed by strong disturbances is probably due to depauperate food availability in these areas [18, 19, 56, 57]. In fact, as the isolation or fragmentation of forests progresses, the proportions of small carabid beetle species have been shown to increase [45]. Therefore, small body size is a characteristic of carabid beetles that inhabit severe environments.As reported in studies of alpine carabid beetles in Europe [11, 12, 14], there was a large proportion of short-winged carabid beetles at our study site. Although less than 30% of the carabid beetle species were brachypterous or apterous and are incapable of flying in the lowland areas (altitude 140–680 m) of Mt. Hakusan [54], 83% (19 of 23 species) were brachypterous or apterous in our study (Figure 5(b)). The growing literature from lowland areas suggests that stable habitats, such as large forested areas, are generally represented by brachypterous or apterous carabid beetle species [21, 44, 45, 57], whereas fragmented habitats, such as small patches of forest following deforestation, are generally represented by macropterous carabid species [45, 57, 58]. Herbaceous vegetation in high-altitude areas is usually in a stable, climax condition [59]; therefore, the carabid beetles living there may not need to move long distances. Alternatively, developing and maintaining full wings and flight muscles is energy intensive [3]. In harsh alpine-subalpine environments, carabid species may invest energy in survival rather than wing-development.Unlike the European Alps or Apennines, where the percentages of endemic carabid beetles are high [60], we did not find any endemic carabid species in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan; some carabid species are common in other alpine areas of central Japan. Similarly, no endemic vascular plants have been reported from Mt. Hakusan. The lack of endemic species on Mt. Hakusan is probably due to the new geographical background of this area. Mt. Hakusan is a volcano that formed 30,000 to 40,000 years ago (Late Pleistocene) [61]. By contrast, the European Alps were formed between 66 and 150 million years ago (Cretaceous period) [62]. Nevertheless, there are signs that endemic carabid species are evolving on Mt. Hakusan. For, example,L. arboreus, which is a representative carabid species in many habitats on Mt. Hakusan, is endemic at the subspecies level on Mt. Hakusan and neighboring mountains in central Japan [41].The carabid beetle fauna in the high mountain areas of Mt. Hakusan was more similar to that of the Japanese Alps than to that at the foot of the mountain. Between 14 and 15 carabid beetle species were previously recorded in studies conducted above 2000 m altitude in the Southern and Northern Japanese Alps [5, 63]. Of these, seven carabid beetles,C.exilis (synonym ofL. arboreus),N. pusilla,Nebria sadona,T. aurescens,P. janoi,Pristosia aeneola, andAgonum kitanoi (synonym ofP. kitanoi) from the Northern Japanese Alps, and four carabid beetles,L. arboreus,T. aurescens,Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (synonym ofP. honshuensis), andP. aeneola from the Southern Japanese Alps, were commonly identified in our study. Mt. Hakusan is geographically isolated from the closest mountain in the Japanese Alps, which lies at a linear distance of over 50 km. The 11 carabid beetle species commonly identified in high mountain areas on Mt. Hakusan and in the Japanese Alps have not been recorded from lowland areas [45, 46, 64]. During the ice age, many alpine plant species from northern areas colonized the mountains [65]. As the climate warmed, these plants were isolated as relics in areas at high elevation [65]. This scenario has also been reported for carabid beetles on high European mountains [59]. Likewise, alpine carabid beetles in Japan are probably distributed in isolated alpine habitats as relics.Overall, carabid beetles in the high mountain areas of Mt. Hakusan were characterized by depauperate fauna with a small number of dominant species, small body size, wingless species, and isolated populations, with some species that are commonly distributed in high mountain ecosystems of the Japanese Alps.


## 4.2. Effects of Habitat Type and Microclimate on Carabid Beetle Assemblages

The total carabid beetle abundance inPinus scrub was relatively constant during the study period. ThePinus scrub on Mt. Hakusan was associated with medium to large nonmacropterous species such asL. arboreus,L. subaeneus,T. aurescens,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, andP. janoi (Figure 4). Large body size and winglessness are typical of carabid beetles inhabiting stable habitats [66, 67]. In our study, large wingless species dominated thePinus habitat, probably becausePinus scrub is a stable habitat in high mountain areas.By contrast, the total carabid beetle abundance fluctuated markedly in the snow beds and alpine meadows (Figure3(a)), probably because of the major environmental changes associated with summertime snowmelt. Although many carabid beetles in lowland areas have distinct breeding seasons in spring or autumn, those in high-elevation areas lack distinct breeding seasons [11]. With the rapid disappearance of snowmelt water, carabid beetles inhabiting snow beds and alpine meadows may need to breed rapidly just after snowmelt; consequently, the activity levels of all carabid beetles in snow beds and alpine meadows may increase simultaneously following snowmelt.The snow beds and alpine meadows were also characterized by high soil water content (TableS1; Figure 2). In lowland areas, the soil water content is often among the most important factors influencing the assemblage compositions of carabid beetles [23, 68, 69]. Representative carabid beetles of snow beds and alpine meadows wereBembidion sp.,Platynus sp., andP. honshuensis, all of which are small to medium in size (Figure 5(a)). Because these three carabid beetle species have been mainly recorded from snow fields, alpine meadows, and/or river banks, but not fromPinus scrub on Mt. Hakusan [38, 70, 71], these species likely prefer moist alpine habitats. Moreover,Platynus sp. is macropterous and is thus expected to fly when dispersing. In lowland areas, many studies have found that small or macropterous carabid beetle species increased in number as the extent of disturbance rose [44, 66, 67]. Thus, snow beds and alpine meadows were probably represented by carabid beetles better adapted to inhabit unstable environments.In addition to large temporal variation in the total carabid beetle abundance, intersite variation in the total carabid beetle abundance was also prominent in snow beds and alpine meadows between July 15 and 24 (TableS2). Hiramatsu [72] found that carabid beetle abundance on snow beds changed markedly with the distance from the remaining snow. Therefore, the large intersite variation in carabid beetle abundance in snow beds and alpine meadows observed in our study was probably caused by differential snowmelt stages and the associated differences in microclimatic factors.Although fell-fields were represented by six species of carabid beetles, only two small or medium nonmacropterous species (N. pusilla andTrechus sp.) were unique to this habitat (Figure 4).Nippononebria pusilla andTrechus vicarius (synonym ofTrechus sp.) have been previously documented from the alpine-upper subalpine zone of the Northern Japanese Alps [5]. BecauseN. pusilla andTrechus sp. have not been recorded from the non-fell-field habitats of Mt. Hakusan [38, 70, 71], these two species might occur only in the high mountain fell-fields of central Japan. By contrast, the remaining four species also occurred in other habitats in the present study:Bembidion sp. in snow beds and alpine meadows,P. kitanoi andC. xestus inPinus scrub, andL. arboreus in all habitats (Figure 4). Some small- to medium-sized carabid beetles (Bembidion sp.,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, N. pusilla, andTrechus sp.) may use fell-fields as either temporary or permanent habitats. It is also possible that fell-fields serve as temporary habitats or dispersal corridors for mobile large carabid beetles (L. arboreus) that are predominantly found in other habitats.Temperature also significantly affects carabid beetle compositions [73–75]. In our study, the mean ground surface temperature was an important predictor of carabid beetle compositions in three of the five best BIO-ENV models for July 24 and in all five best models for August 27, while the diurnal temperature range was an important predictor in the fifth best model for July 24 and in three of the best five best models for August 27 (Table 3). Therefore, the mean ground surface temperature was probably more significant in terms of carabid beetle compositions during the period shortly after snowmelt than was the diurnal temperature range. In late August, after the snow has melted completely, both the mean ground surface temperature and diurnal temperature range may become important in determining carabid beetle compositions.


## 4.3. Carabid Beetles as an Important Target Group to Monitor Ecological Effects of Global Warming on Mountain Ecosystems

Over the past few decades, signs of global warming have been reported in mountainous areas worldwide [76–78]. Of the various mountain habitats, snow beds and alpine meadows are expected to be severely impacted by global warming due to reduced winter snowfall, accelerated snowmelt, and lower ground moisture content after snowmelt [33, 79]. Furthermore, alpine meadows will be progressively invaded bySasaspp. andP. pumila because of acceleration in the rate of desiccation [33, 80, 81]. Furthermore, ifP. pumila invades snow beds and alpine meadows, the carabid beetles therein may be replaced by carabids representative ofPinusscrub, such asL. subaeneus,T. aurescens,P. kitanoi,C. xestus, andP. janoi. In this study,Platynus sp. andP. honshuensiswere found almost exclusively in snow beds and alpine meadows; these species may be the first to disappear from the subalpine/alpine zone as global warming progresses. In addition, fell-fields constitute a critical mountain ecosystem that is found only in high mountain areas constantly exposed to strong winds. The minimum and maximum daily temperatures in high mountain areas have increased recently [82]. As global warming progresses, fell-fields may become hotter and dryer, and the interstitial spaces between rocks and underneath dwarf shrubs may no longer serve as refuges or temporary habitats for the carabid beetles that prefer such microhabitats. Consequently, carabid beetle species that are found exclusively in fell-fields, such asN. pusilla andTrechus sp., may disappear from high mountains.


## 5. Conclusion

In summary, the carabid beetle assemblages in the alpine-subalpine zone of Mt. Hakusan were generally characterized by small body size and reduced wings, with high habitat specificity. This study is the first to document the habitat associations and morphological traits of alpine carabid beetles on a Japanese mountain. The results conform to the general patterns reported from European mountains, which have a longer geological history and high carabid endemism [59].Mountain areas are especially susceptible to global climate change [83, 84]. Given their high habitat specificity, carabid beetle assemblages in high mountain areas are expected to change dramatically in the face of global warming. Therefore, it will be important to monitor the abundance, species composition, and habitat associations of carabid beetles in the alpine-subalpine zone on Mt. Hakusan or elsewhere in the world.



---

*Source: 9754376-2018-04-03.xml*