# An Emerging Translational Model to Screen Potential Medicinal Plants for Nephrolithiasis, an Independent Risk Factor for Chronic Kidney Disease

Authors: San-Yuan Wu; Jui-Lung Shen; Kee-Ming Man; Yuan-Ju Lee; Huey-Yi Chen; Yung-Hsiang Chen; Kao-Sung Tsai; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Wei-Yong Lin; Wen-Chi Chen
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Pharmacological therapy for urolithiasis using medicinal plants has been increasingly adopted for the prevention of its recurrence. ADrosophila melanogaster model developed for translational research of urolithiasis was applied to evaluate agents with potential antilithic effects and calcium oxalate (CaOx) formation. Potential antilithic herbs were prepared in a mixture of food in a diluted concentration of 5,000 from the original extract with 0.5% ethylene glycol (EG) as the lithogenic agent. The control group was fed with food only. After 3 weeks, flies (n
≥
150 for each group) were killed using CO2 narcotization, and the Malpighian tubules were dissected, removed, and processed for polarized light microscopy examination of the crystals. The crystal formation rate in the EG group was 100.0%. In the study, 16 tested herbal drugs reached the crystal formation rate of 0.0%, including Salviae miltiorrhizae, Paeonia lactiflora, and Carthami flos. Scutellaria baicalensis enhanced CaOx crystal formation. Two herbal drugs Commiphora molmol and Natrii sulfas caused the death of all flies. Our rapid screening methods provided evidence that some medicinal plants have potential antilithic effects. These useful medicinal plants can be further studied using other animal or human models to verify their effects.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Urolithiasis is a common urologic disorder with high prevalence and recurrence [1–4]. It has been reported that kidney stones are a significant and independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease in the general population. An overall prevalence from 9.6% to 6.5% and a 5-year recurrence rate of 34.7% are observed in Taiwan [5, 6]. Owing to high recurrence, various treatment modalities are available; however, currently, the prevention of the recurrence of urolithiasis remains a challenge [7].Pharmacological therapy for urolithiasis using medicinal plants in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been arising for the prevention of its recurrence [8–12]. A single agent or formula such as Takusha, Wulingsan, andDesmodium styracifolium were reviewed by Miyaoka and Monga. They concluded that TCM has promising roles in urinary stone prevention [13]. However, over 300 different types of medicinal plants exist according to the record of “Ben Cao Bei Yao (本
草
備
要; Complete Essentials of the Materia Medica),” a famous TCM pharmacology book. Few of them were studied for the antilithic effect, although potential effects were recorded. One of the possible causes for this is the lack of rapid tools to extensively study these abundant herbal drugs [14–16].The development of novel translational research technologies and approaches is of central importance for successful complementary and alternative (CAM) research. Recently, we have developed a fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) model for translational research of urolithiasis and applied this model to the evaluation of agents that may have potential antilithic effect [17–19]. The Malpighian tubule of the fruit fly has a function similar to the human kidney [20–23].Calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystal formation can be seen 3 weeks after the addition of lithogenic agents (ethylene glycol (EG)) to the food. The crystals were easily observed under polarized microscopy, and the crystal formation rate can then be evaluated [17–19]. For example, a test for the effect of melamine on crystal formation inDrosophila was performed. The results indicate that the administration of melamine caused crystal formation in a mixture of CaOx, calcium phosphate, uric acid, and melamine crystals [18]. In a previous study by Ho et al., it was found that potassium citrate could prevent crystal formation in EG-induced CaOx nephrolithiasis inDrosophila. No inhibitory capability of commercial citrate-containing juice was observed for CaOx crystal formation in the Malpighian tubules of the fly [19]. Therefore, this model can be further used as a rapid screening method to test any drugs that have a potential antilithic effect. Since kidney stones are a significant and independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease in the general population. In this study, we attempted to use this emerging translational model to rapidly screen the potential antilithic medicinal plants.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Animal Model

We used wild-type maleD. melanogaster fed with 0.5% EG as lithogenic group andD. melanogaster fed without lithogenic agent as control group in this study for the evaluation of CaOx crystal formation [17–19]. In brief, flies were bred in plastic vials containing a medium of yeast, corn syrup, and agar. Flies were maintained under a condition of 25°C, 60% humidity, and a 12 h light-dark cycle. Potential antilithic herbs were prepared in a mixture of food in a diluted concentration of 5,000 from the original extract with 0.5% EG (Sigma, USA) as the lithogenic agent. The control group of flies was fed with food only. After 3 weeks, flies (n
≥
150 for each group) were killed by CO2 narcotization, and the Malpighian tubules were dissected, removed, and processed for examination of the crystals by polarized light microscopy.


### 2.2. Screening of Potential Antilithic Medicinal Plants

The extracts of herbs were provided by Sun Ten Pharmaceutical Co. (Taichung, Taiwan). We then selected potential herbs according to the record of “Ben Cao Bei Yao.” A total of 80 herbs were tested in this study (Table1). Tested herbal drugs were considered to have an antilithic effect if the crystal formation rate was zero. The total death of flies in the tested group was not considered for the positive effect.Table 1
Potential antilithic medicinal plants/agents and rate of calcium oxalate crystal formation in Malpighian tubules of maleDrosophila.
Common name
Latin name/chemical name
Crystal formation (%)
Control
10.20
0.5% EG
100.00
Chinese hawthorn
Crataegus pinnatifida
36.36
Dogwood
Cornus officinalis
62.50
Chinese yam
Dioscorea opposite
45.45
Sichuan lovage rhizome
Ligusticum chuanxiong
27.27
Pseudoginseng
Panax notoginseng
33.33
Common bur reed
Sparganium stoloniferum
45.45
Szechwan chinaberry
Melia toosendan
30.00
Rhubarb
Rheum rhabarbarum
25.00
Morinda root
Morindae officinalis.
33.33
Trogopterus dung
Faeces trogopterori
7.14
Salvia root
Salviae miltiorrhizae
0.00
Cowherb seed
Semen vaccariae
20.00
Achyranthes root
Achyranthis bidentatae
30.00
Costus root
Aucklandia lappa
20.00
Kidney tea
Clerodendranthus spicatus
30.00
Akebia caulis
Caulis akebiae
10.00
Licorice root
Glycyrrhiza uralensis
40.00
Largehead atractylodes
Atractylodis macrocephalae
80.00
White peony root
Paeonia lactiflora
0.00
Dried rehmannia root
Rehmannia glutinosa
30.00
Safflower
Carthami flos
0.00
Dark plum fruit
Fructus mume
60.00
Bupleurum
Bupleurum chinensis
54.55
Magnolia bark
Magnolia officinalis
50.00
Peach kernel
Semen persicae
25.00
Immature bitter orange
Citrus aurantium
50.00
Fructus aurantii
Citrus aurantium Fructus
40.00
Wolfberry
Lycium barbarum
66.67
Corydalis tuber
Corydalis yanhusuo
0.00
Walnut
Juglans regia
30.00
Herba lysimachiae
Lysimachia christinae
9.00
Common monkshood root
Aconitum carmichaelii
40.00
Chinese clematis
Clematis chinensis
28.57
Fructus evodiae
Evodia rutaecarpa
18.18
Lalang grass rhizome
Imperata cylindrica
0.00
Cinnamon
Cinnamomum cassia
8.33
Ginger
Zingiber officinale
10.00
Chingma abutilon seed
Abutilon indicum
41.67
Taiwan angelica root
Angelica dahurica
25.00
Cynanchum glaucescens
Cynanchi stauntonii
8.33
Blackened swallowwort root
Cynanchum atratum
9.09
Almond
Prunus armeniaca
0.00
Yerbadetajo herb
Eclipta prostrata
0.00
Myrrh
Commiphora molmol
—
Common peony root
Paeonia veitchii
64.00
Argy wormwood leaf
Artemisia argyi
0.00
Glauber’s salt
Sodium sulfate
—
Plantaginis seed
Plantago asiatica L.
0.00
Honeysuckle stem
Lonicera japonica
0.00
Plantaginis
Plantago asiatica
0.00
Frankincense
Boswellia sacra
11.00
Giant knotweed
Polygoni cuspidati
0.00
Honeysuckle flower
Lonicera japonica Thunb.
18.00
Polyporus
Polyporus umbellatus
75.00
Talcum powder
Pulvis talci
40.00
Taraxacum
Taraxacum officinale
57.14
Membrane of chicken gizzard
N/A
66.67
Common rush
Juncus effusus
28.57
Carapax trionycis
Trionyx sinensis
57.14
Rehmanniae preparata root
Rehmannia glutinosa
44.44
Bazheng powder
N/A
33.00
Fringed pink
Dianthus superbus
75.00
Water plantain
Alisma canaliculatum
25.00
Coix seed
Coix lacryma-jobi
75.00
Pilose asiabell root
Codonopsis pilosula
33.33
Himalayan teasel root
Dipsacus asperoides
100.00
Milkvetch root
Astragalus membranaceus
0.00
Cape jasmine fruit
Gardenia jasminoides
50.00
Rhizoma curcumae
Curcuma phaeocaulis
50.00
Indian buead
Wolfiporia cocos
0.00
Sweetgum fruit
Liquidambar formosana
20.00
Rice paperiant pith
Tetrapanax papyriferus
100.00
Combined spicebush root
Lindera aggregata
40.00
Corn stigma
Zea maysL.
66.00
Common knotgrass
Polygonum aviculareL.
50.00
Baical skullcap root
Scutellaria baicalensis
0.00
Angelica root
Angelicae sinensis
0.00
South dodder seed
Cuscuta chinensis
100.00
Scurfpea fruit
Psoralea corylifolia
25.00
Dwarf lilyturf tuber
Ophiopogonjaponica
50.00


### 2.3. Observation of CaOx Crystal Formation

The Malpighian tubules were dissected and immediately observed under normal and polarized white light using an Olympus BX51 optical microscope (Japan) after crystal induction. We photographed the relevant crystal aspects using a Kodak ProImage 100 film with scales (USA).


### 2.4. Statistical Analysis

For each group, data are presented as the crystal formation rate (%). All calculations were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 8.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


## 2.1. Animal Model

We used wild-type maleD. melanogaster fed with 0.5% EG as lithogenic group andD. melanogaster fed without lithogenic agent as control group in this study for the evaluation of CaOx crystal formation [17–19]. In brief, flies were bred in plastic vials containing a medium of yeast, corn syrup, and agar. Flies were maintained under a condition of 25°C, 60% humidity, and a 12 h light-dark cycle. Potential antilithic herbs were prepared in a mixture of food in a diluted concentration of 5,000 from the original extract with 0.5% EG (Sigma, USA) as the lithogenic agent. The control group of flies was fed with food only. After 3 weeks, flies (n
≥
150 for each group) were killed by CO2 narcotization, and the Malpighian tubules were dissected, removed, and processed for examination of the crystals by polarized light microscopy.


## 2.2. Screening of Potential Antilithic Medicinal Plants

The extracts of herbs were provided by Sun Ten Pharmaceutical Co. (Taichung, Taiwan). We then selected potential herbs according to the record of “Ben Cao Bei Yao.” A total of 80 herbs were tested in this study (Table1). Tested herbal drugs were considered to have an antilithic effect if the crystal formation rate was zero. The total death of flies in the tested group was not considered for the positive effect.Table 1
Potential antilithic medicinal plants/agents and rate of calcium oxalate crystal formation in Malpighian tubules of maleDrosophila.
Common name
Latin name/chemical name
Crystal formation (%)
Control
10.20
0.5% EG
100.00
Chinese hawthorn
Crataegus pinnatifida
36.36
Dogwood
Cornus officinalis
62.50
Chinese yam
Dioscorea opposite
45.45
Sichuan lovage rhizome
Ligusticum chuanxiong
27.27
Pseudoginseng
Panax notoginseng
33.33
Common bur reed
Sparganium stoloniferum
45.45
Szechwan chinaberry
Melia toosendan
30.00
Rhubarb
Rheum rhabarbarum
25.00
Morinda root
Morindae officinalis.
33.33
Trogopterus dung
Faeces trogopterori
7.14
Salvia root
Salviae miltiorrhizae
0.00
Cowherb seed
Semen vaccariae
20.00
Achyranthes root
Achyranthis bidentatae
30.00
Costus root
Aucklandia lappa
20.00
Kidney tea
Clerodendranthus spicatus
30.00
Akebia caulis
Caulis akebiae
10.00
Licorice root
Glycyrrhiza uralensis
40.00
Largehead atractylodes
Atractylodis macrocephalae
80.00
White peony root
Paeonia lactiflora
0.00
Dried rehmannia root
Rehmannia glutinosa
30.00
Safflower
Carthami flos
0.00
Dark plum fruit
Fructus mume
60.00
Bupleurum
Bupleurum chinensis
54.55
Magnolia bark
Magnolia officinalis
50.00
Peach kernel
Semen persicae
25.00
Immature bitter orange
Citrus aurantium
50.00
Fructus aurantii
Citrus aurantium Fructus
40.00
Wolfberry
Lycium barbarum
66.67
Corydalis tuber
Corydalis yanhusuo
0.00
Walnut
Juglans regia
30.00
Herba lysimachiae
Lysimachia christinae
9.00
Common monkshood root
Aconitum carmichaelii
40.00
Chinese clematis
Clematis chinensis
28.57
Fructus evodiae
Evodia rutaecarpa
18.18
Lalang grass rhizome
Imperata cylindrica
0.00
Cinnamon
Cinnamomum cassia
8.33
Ginger
Zingiber officinale
10.00
Chingma abutilon seed
Abutilon indicum
41.67
Taiwan angelica root
Angelica dahurica
25.00
Cynanchum glaucescens
Cynanchi stauntonii
8.33
Blackened swallowwort root
Cynanchum atratum
9.09
Almond
Prunus armeniaca
0.00
Yerbadetajo herb
Eclipta prostrata
0.00
Myrrh
Commiphora molmol
—
Common peony root
Paeonia veitchii
64.00
Argy wormwood leaf
Artemisia argyi
0.00
Glauber’s salt
Sodium sulfate
—
Plantaginis seed
Plantago asiatica L.
0.00
Honeysuckle stem
Lonicera japonica
0.00
Plantaginis
Plantago asiatica
0.00
Frankincense
Boswellia sacra
11.00
Giant knotweed
Polygoni cuspidati
0.00
Honeysuckle flower
Lonicera japonica Thunb.
18.00
Polyporus
Polyporus umbellatus
75.00
Talcum powder
Pulvis talci
40.00
Taraxacum
Taraxacum officinale
57.14
Membrane of chicken gizzard
N/A
66.67
Common rush
Juncus effusus
28.57
Carapax trionycis
Trionyx sinensis
57.14
Rehmanniae preparata root
Rehmannia glutinosa
44.44
Bazheng powder
N/A
33.00
Fringed pink
Dianthus superbus
75.00
Water plantain
Alisma canaliculatum
25.00
Coix seed
Coix lacryma-jobi
75.00
Pilose asiabell root
Codonopsis pilosula
33.33
Himalayan teasel root
Dipsacus asperoides
100.00
Milkvetch root
Astragalus membranaceus
0.00
Cape jasmine fruit
Gardenia jasminoides
50.00
Rhizoma curcumae
Curcuma phaeocaulis
50.00
Indian buead
Wolfiporia cocos
0.00
Sweetgum fruit
Liquidambar formosana
20.00
Rice paperiant pith
Tetrapanax papyriferus
100.00
Combined spicebush root
Lindera aggregata
40.00
Corn stigma
Zea maysL.
66.00
Common knotgrass
Polygonum aviculareL.
50.00
Baical skullcap root
Scutellaria baicalensis
0.00
Angelica root
Angelicae sinensis
0.00
South dodder seed
Cuscuta chinensis
100.00
Scurfpea fruit
Psoralea corylifolia
25.00
Dwarf lilyturf tuber
Ophiopogonjaponica
50.00


## 2.3. Observation of CaOx Crystal Formation

The Malpighian tubules were dissected and immediately observed under normal and polarized white light using an Olympus BX51 optical microscope (Japan) after crystal induction. We photographed the relevant crystal aspects using a Kodak ProImage 100 film with scales (USA).


## 2.4. Statistical Analysis

For each group, data are presented as the crystal formation rate (%). All calculations were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 8.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


## 3. Results

### 3.1. CaOx Crystal Formation Rate

The crystal formation rate in EG and control groups was 100.0% and 10.2%, respectively. Positive CaOx crystal formation can be seen in the Malpighian tubules of flies (Figure1). In the first study, 16 tested herbal drugs reached the crystal formation rate of 0% (Table 1), namely,Salviae miltiorrhizae (number 11, 丹
參),Paeonia lactiflora (number 19, 白
芍
藥),Carthami flos (number 21, 紅
花),Corydalis yanhusuo (number 29, 延
胡
索),Imperata cylindrica (number 35, 白
茅
根),Prunus armeniaca (number 42, 杏
仁),Eclipta prostrata (number 43, 旱
蓮
草),Artemisia argyi (number 46, 艾
葉),Plantago asiatica (number 48 and its seed number 50, 車
前
子),Lonicera japonica (number 49, 忍
冬
藤),Polygoni cuspidati (number 52, 虎
杖),Astragalus membranaceus (number 67, 黃
耆),Wolfiporia cocos(number 70, 茯
苓),Scutellaria baicalensis(number 76, 黃
芩), andAngelicae sinensis (number 77, 當
歸).EG-induced CaOx crystal deposition in the Malpighian tubules. The images show representative polarized microscopy for the (a) control flies and (b) the flies with 0.5% EG-induced crystal formation in Malpighian tubules.
(a)
(b)Two herbal drugs caused the death of all flies in this study. These wereCommiphora molmol (number 44, 沒
藥) andNatrii sulfas (number 47, 芒
硝), and death may be due to their toxicities.In contrast,Cuscuta chinensis (number 78, 菟
絲
子) enhanced CaOx crystal formation in the Malpighian tubules, reaching the crystal formation rate of 100%.


## 3.1. CaOx Crystal Formation Rate

The crystal formation rate in EG and control groups was 100.0% and 10.2%, respectively. Positive CaOx crystal formation can be seen in the Malpighian tubules of flies (Figure1). In the first study, 16 tested herbal drugs reached the crystal formation rate of 0% (Table 1), namely,Salviae miltiorrhizae (number 11, 丹
參),Paeonia lactiflora (number 19, 白
芍
藥),Carthami flos (number 21, 紅
花),Corydalis yanhusuo (number 29, 延
胡
索),Imperata cylindrica (number 35, 白
茅
根),Prunus armeniaca (number 42, 杏
仁),Eclipta prostrata (number 43, 旱
蓮
草),Artemisia argyi (number 46, 艾
葉),Plantago asiatica (number 48 and its seed number 50, 車
前
子),Lonicera japonica (number 49, 忍
冬
藤),Polygoni cuspidati (number 52, 虎
杖),Astragalus membranaceus (number 67, 黃
耆),Wolfiporia cocos(number 70, 茯
苓),Scutellaria baicalensis(number 76, 黃
芩), andAngelicae sinensis (number 77, 當
歸).EG-induced CaOx crystal deposition in the Malpighian tubules. The images show representative polarized microscopy for the (a) control flies and (b) the flies with 0.5% EG-induced crystal formation in Malpighian tubules.
(a)
(b)Two herbal drugs caused the death of all flies in this study. These wereCommiphora molmol (number 44, 沒
藥) andNatrii sulfas (number 47, 芒
硝), and death may be due to their toxicities.In contrast,Cuscuta chinensis (number 78, 菟
絲
子) enhanced CaOx crystal formation in the Malpighian tubules, reaching the crystal formation rate of 100%.


## 4. Discussion

In our survey, 16 herbs were determined to be successful antilithic herbs. Our results provide valuable information for future studies regarding antilithic herbs suitable for the prevention of urolithiasis. In an ongoing study,Carthami flos has been further studied for its potential antilithic effects, and a positive result was obtained when it was applied to a rat model [11].Abundant herbal drugs with antilithic effects that are used for treatment are available in TCM books [17, 24–27]. Some drugs have been studied using in vitro models such as nucleation, crystal aggregation, and crystal growth [23]. Conventionally, rats have been used as animal models to study the crystal formation rate in the kidney. The application of a large number of herbal drugs requires the use of a large number of animals, leading to high cost. Our study used a large number of animals and large-scale drug lists to reach significant results that provide valuable data for the study of antilithic effects. The use of the fruit fly has been cited as a potential new animal model to study urolithiasis and has been proven to be effective [20, 23].Cuscuta chinensis has several pharmacological effects, particularly in the genitourinary tract, including replenishing the kidney essence and improving sperm motility, kidney deficiency, urinary frequency, and erectile dysfunction [28, 29]. Its effectiveness was reported by Pan et al.; they showed that an ethanol extract ofCuscuta chinensis was effective on Th1 and Th2 cell functions and that it could be safely used as an adjuvant in a mice model [30]. A patent (publication number CN102579706 A; 2012) has been used for the application ofCuscuta chinensis as part of a formula for treating urolithiasis in China. This formula reached an effective rate of 70%. We also selectedCuscuta chinensis as a potential antilithic agent in this study. However, the treatment detail of this formula remains unclear because this formula is not composed of a single herb. Based on our results,Cuscuta chinensis exerted adverse effects that completely enhanced crystal formation. Therefore, further studies will need to be performed to clearly identify the effects of individual components by other means.Natrii sulfas is a TCM drug made from crystals refined from the processed Glauber’s salt, which is crystalline hydrated form of sodium sulfate. It mainly contains Na2SO4·10H2O. In a study on rats,Natrii sulfas was suggested to have a protective effect on ischemia-induced brain edema and to improve the physiological symptoms [31]. It has been recorded in the TCM books thatNatrii sulfas can cause the lysis of urinary stones, but it caused the death of flies in this study. Although these herbal drugs may have potential antilithic effects, they have been revealed to have toxic effects; therefore, they cannot be used as a single agent for the treatment of urolithiasis. Conventionally, TCM uses a formula with a combination of several drugs to reduce the toxic effect. These drugs should be carefully reconsidered if used clinically.Myrrha is a resin made from theCommiphora molmol tree. Studies onMyrrha revealed analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in the treatment of various diseases associated with inflammatory pain, such as arthritis, obesity, microbial infection, wound, pain, fractures, tumor, and gastrointestinal diseases [32, 33]. In this study, we selectedMyrrha because it is used for spasm and pain relief. However, in our study,Myrrha caused the death of flies. Some side effects have been associated withMyrrha, such as bleeding tendency, damage to the kidney, or stomach pain [34, 35]. The use of smaller dosage as part of the herbal formula has been suggested. The limitation of this herb is that it caused the death of flies. Further studies using smaller dosage may elucidate the effect ofMyrrha on the treatment of urolithiasis.An advantage of our study is that a large number of types of herbs could be rapidly screened within a short period using a large number of animals. The limitations of this study include crude water extracts only, limited dosage control, and invertebrate animal model, which may have important anatomical differences compared with mammals. However, this model has proven to be reliable, since several scientific research articles have been published with this stable fly model.


## 5. Conclusion

The development of novel translational research technologies and approaches is of central importance for successful CAM research [36–39]. For long, a huge disconnect has been observed between clinical and preclinical studies of CAM agents. Our rapid screening methods provide evidence that some traditional herbs have a potential antilithic effect. These useful crude extracts can be further studied using other animal or human models to verify their effects, which have been recorded in TCM books.



---

*Source: 972958-2014-07-06.xml*