# Analysis of Depth of Shade on Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabric among Different Woven Fabric Structures

Authors: Md Shamim Alam
Journal: Journal of Materials
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to analyze and compare the color strengths of mercerized and unmercerized fabric among different fabric structures. In this research work Remazol reactive dye and three types of woven fabrics were used such as20
⁎
20 sheeting, 30
⁎
30 sheeting, and herringbone. Spectrophotometer was used to find out the amount of dye which is fixed in the fabrics after soap wash. Three different woven fabrics were dyed with reactive dye (Remazol Red, Remazol Yellow, and Remazol Blue) using pad dyeing method. It was found that mercerized fabric had higher depth of shade under the same dye concentration. In case of shade A (0.5%) 20
⁎
20 sheeting showed better color strength compared to other two structures but for shade B (1.5%) and shade C (4%) herringbone fabric showed better dye absorptive capacity than 20
⁎
20 sheeting.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cotton fabrics are known to have been in use at least for 7000 years [1]. Today, cotton textiles represent more than half of the global textile market [2] and the demand is expected to continue [3]. This dominance of cotton fiber is mainly due to its natural comfort, performance, and appearance.Preparation of cotton woven fabrics normally consists of singeing, desizing, scouring, and bleaching [4]. In most other cases, scouring and bleaching are the only preparation processes. For certain end uses, mercerizing is carried out. Singeing is the process of removing protruding fibers on the surface of the fabric. This process is omitted for certain end-use products such as flannel and velvet fabrics. Desizing is the process of removing the size on the most woven fabrics. Size is applied to reduce the frictional properties of warp yarns that improves weaving productivity by decreasing yarn breakages and increasing weft insertion speeds. Bleaching is done on cotton fabric to destroy the natural yellowish-brown colour of cotton fibers and the fibers’ color turns into pure white.Mercerization of cotton fabric is common practice in the preparation process that enhances dye uptake and facilitates uniform dyeing in addition to improving dimensional stability, strength, and luster [5]. Changes in microstructure, morphology, and conformation of the cellulose chains also occur during mercerization. The extent of the changes that occur depends on the processing time, caustic concentration, temperature, degree of polymerization, and source of cellulose, slack or tension treatment, the degree of applied tension during the treatment, and physical state of cellulose [6].Pad-batch dyeing process is the most economical of all pad dyeing processes for the reactive dyeing of cotton [7]. In fact, for small lots of around 1000–10,000 meters, this process is more economical than exhaust dyeing, mainly due to minimal energy requirements. This process involves padding the fabric with a dye solution containing a suitable alkali system and then winding up the padded fabric onto a suitable roller [8].In this work, an attempt was made to investigate the effect of mercerization as well as to observe the effect of color strength on mercerized and unmercerized fabric among different fabric structures. Three fabric structures were dyed with three different shade % of Remazol reactive dye. Finally spectrophotometer was used to find out the strength of color on mercerized and unmercerized fabrics.


## 2. Experimental Methodology

### 2.1. Materials

#### 2.1.1. Fabrics

Three types of woven fabrics were taken, that is,20
∗
20 sheeting, 30
∗
30 sheeting, and herringbone. These fabrics were collected from “Syntax Finishing Mills,” BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur.


#### 2.1.2. Instruments

Electric balance, scissor, beaker, sample dyeing machine, hot wash machine, pipette, squeezer machine, dryer and spectrophotometer with colour I match software, and so forth were used during this research work.


#### 2.1.3. Dye Stuff and Chemicals

The chemicals and dye stuffs were collected from Syntax Finishing Mills, BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur. Reactive dye Remazol (Red, Blue, and Yellow), electrolyte (Gluber salt Na2SO4·10H2O), alkali (soda ash-Na2CO3 and caustic soda NaOH), soaping agent (SW CONE), acetic acid (100%), wetting agent and sequestering agent, and so forth were used.


### 2.2. Methodology

#### 2.2.1. Sample Preparation

In this research work 100% cotton woven fabric was used that had been prepared from Syntax Finishing Mills. Here pretreatment like desizing, scouring, bleaching, and mercerization was done on the fabrics. 1% stock solution of Remazol red, yellow, and blue was prepared.


#### 2.2.2. Procedure for Dyeing

At first, 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of mercerized fabrics and 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of unmercerized fabrics were taken. Three different shades (Table 1) were applied on mercerized and unmercerized fabrics.Table 1
Different shade % applied on different fabric structures.
Shade %
Mercerized fabric
Unmercerized fabric
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
Shade A (0.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade B (1.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade C (4%)
√
√
√
√
√
√Then the fabrics were dyed by using pad dyeing method with the help of lab dyeing machine where the liquor ratio was 1 : 10 for the mentioned shade percentage (see Table1). During dyeing, standard methods were followed as prescribed by the manufacturers. The pH of the dye bath was adjusted by soda ash. We set the bath with substrate at room temperature 40°C and then added sample, dyes, soda ash, sequestering agent, wetting agent, anticreasing agent, leveling agent, and salt. Dyeing was done very quickly by pad dyeing machine. Total 18 fabric samples (9 mercerized and 9 unmercerized) were dyed by the same process. Then all the dyed samples were collected separately and covered with polybag and then put on the oven and kept for 30 mins for drying. After that we took the fabric after treatment. Then neutralization (by 1 g/L acetic acid), soap wash (by 1 g/L detergent), hot wash, and cold wash were done sequentially. Then fabric was squeezed in the cold padder for 1 min; at last calendaring was done on the fabric for 2 mins. Dyeing recipe for different shades of reactive dyes is given in Table 2.Table 2
Recipe used for dyeing.
Shade A (0.5%)
Shade B (1.5%)
Shade C (4%)
Glauber salt = 20 g/L
Glauber salt = 50 g/L
Glauber salt = 70 g/L
Soda ash = 5 g/L
Soda ash = 15 g/L
Soda ash = 20 g/L
Wetting agent: 1 g/L; leveling agent: 1 g/L; anticreasing agent: 1 g/L; material to liquor ratio = 1 : 10; temperature: 70°C (these parameters were used for three shades).


#### 2.2.3. Measurement of Depth of Shade of Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabrics

The reflectance values at all wavelengths were measured by using a spectrophotometer. White mercerized and unmercerized fabrics were taken as standard and depth of shade was calculated using the built-in software of the computer color matching system.


#### 2.2.4. Measurement of Color Fastness to Wash

ISO standards 105-C02 method was followed for wash fastness test. A specimen of 10 × 4 cm was attached with a multifiber fabric strip. Washing solution containing 5 g/L detergent was taken in the laboratory dyeing machine with a liquor ratio of 1 : 50. The specimen was treated for 45 minutes at 50 ± 20°C. The specimen was then removed and rinsed in normal water and dried in shadow. The change in color and degree of staining was evaluated visually using geometric grey scale given in Table3.Table 3
Effect of shade % on mercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Dye at fabric (depth of shade)
Dye loss
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.36%
0.14%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.17%
0.33%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.31%
0.19%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
1.08%
0.42%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.84%
0.66%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.18%
0.32%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
2.80%
1.20%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
2.1%
1.90%
Herringbone
4%
3.1%
0.90%


## 2.1. Materials

### 2.1.1. Fabrics

Three types of woven fabrics were taken, that is,20
∗
20 sheeting, 30
∗
30 sheeting, and herringbone. These fabrics were collected from “Syntax Finishing Mills,” BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur.


### 2.1.2. Instruments

Electric balance, scissor, beaker, sample dyeing machine, hot wash machine, pipette, squeezer machine, dryer and spectrophotometer with colour I match software, and so forth were used during this research work.


### 2.1.3. Dye Stuff and Chemicals

The chemicals and dye stuffs were collected from Syntax Finishing Mills, BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur. Reactive dye Remazol (Red, Blue, and Yellow), electrolyte (Gluber salt Na2SO4·10H2O), alkali (soda ash-Na2CO3 and caustic soda NaOH), soaping agent (SW CONE), acetic acid (100%), wetting agent and sequestering agent, and so forth were used.


## 2.1.1. Fabrics

Three types of woven fabrics were taken, that is,20
∗
20 sheeting, 30
∗
30 sheeting, and herringbone. These fabrics were collected from “Syntax Finishing Mills,” BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur.


## 2.1.2. Instruments

Electric balance, scissor, beaker, sample dyeing machine, hot wash machine, pipette, squeezer machine, dryer and spectrophotometer with colour I match software, and so forth were used during this research work.


## 2.1.3. Dye Stuff and Chemicals

The chemicals and dye stuffs were collected from Syntax Finishing Mills, BSCIC Station road, Tongi, Gazipur. Reactive dye Remazol (Red, Blue, and Yellow), electrolyte (Gluber salt Na2SO4·10H2O), alkali (soda ash-Na2CO3 and caustic soda NaOH), soaping agent (SW CONE), acetic acid (100%), wetting agent and sequestering agent, and so forth were used.


## 2.2. Methodology

### 2.2.1. Sample Preparation

In this research work 100% cotton woven fabric was used that had been prepared from Syntax Finishing Mills. Here pretreatment like desizing, scouring, bleaching, and mercerization was done on the fabrics. 1% stock solution of Remazol red, yellow, and blue was prepared.


### 2.2.2. Procedure for Dyeing

At first, 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of mercerized fabrics and 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of unmercerized fabrics were taken. Three different shades (Table 1) were applied on mercerized and unmercerized fabrics.Table 1
Different shade % applied on different fabric structures.
Shade %
Mercerized fabric
Unmercerized fabric
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
Shade A (0.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade B (1.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade C (4%)
√
√
√
√
√
√Then the fabrics were dyed by using pad dyeing method with the help of lab dyeing machine where the liquor ratio was 1 : 10 for the mentioned shade percentage (see Table1). During dyeing, standard methods were followed as prescribed by the manufacturers. The pH of the dye bath was adjusted by soda ash. We set the bath with substrate at room temperature 40°C and then added sample, dyes, soda ash, sequestering agent, wetting agent, anticreasing agent, leveling agent, and salt. Dyeing was done very quickly by pad dyeing machine. Total 18 fabric samples (9 mercerized and 9 unmercerized) were dyed by the same process. Then all the dyed samples were collected separately and covered with polybag and then put on the oven and kept for 30 mins for drying. After that we took the fabric after treatment. Then neutralization (by 1 g/L acetic acid), soap wash (by 1 g/L detergent), hot wash, and cold wash were done sequentially. Then fabric was squeezed in the cold padder for 1 min; at last calendaring was done on the fabric for 2 mins. Dyeing recipe for different shades of reactive dyes is given in Table 2.Table 2
Recipe used for dyeing.
Shade A (0.5%)
Shade B (1.5%)
Shade C (4%)
Glauber salt = 20 g/L
Glauber salt = 50 g/L
Glauber salt = 70 g/L
Soda ash = 5 g/L
Soda ash = 15 g/L
Soda ash = 20 g/L
Wetting agent: 1 g/L; leveling agent: 1 g/L; anticreasing agent: 1 g/L; material to liquor ratio = 1 : 10; temperature: 70°C (these parameters were used for three shades).


### 2.2.3. Measurement of Depth of Shade of Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabrics

The reflectance values at all wavelengths were measured by using a spectrophotometer. White mercerized and unmercerized fabrics were taken as standard and depth of shade was calculated using the built-in software of the computer color matching system.


### 2.2.4. Measurement of Color Fastness to Wash

ISO standards 105-C02 method was followed for wash fastness test. A specimen of 10 × 4 cm was attached with a multifiber fabric strip. Washing solution containing 5 g/L detergent was taken in the laboratory dyeing machine with a liquor ratio of 1 : 50. The specimen was treated for 45 minutes at 50 ± 20°C. The specimen was then removed and rinsed in normal water and dried in shadow. The change in color and degree of staining was evaluated visually using geometric grey scale given in Table3.Table 3
Effect of shade % on mercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Dye at fabric (depth of shade)
Dye loss
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.36%
0.14%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.17%
0.33%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.31%
0.19%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
1.08%
0.42%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.84%
0.66%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.18%
0.32%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
2.80%
1.20%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
2.1%
1.90%
Herringbone
4%
3.1%
0.90%


## 2.2.1. Sample Preparation

In this research work 100% cotton woven fabric was used that had been prepared from Syntax Finishing Mills. Here pretreatment like desizing, scouring, bleaching, and mercerization was done on the fabrics. 1% stock solution of Remazol red, yellow, and blue was prepared.


## 2.2.2. Procedure for Dyeing

At first, 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of mercerized fabrics and 9 pieces (3
∗
3) of unmercerized fabrics were taken. Three different shades (Table 1) were applied on mercerized and unmercerized fabrics.Table 1
Different shade % applied on different fabric structures.
Shade %
Mercerized fabric
Unmercerized fabric
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
20 × 20 sheeting
30 × 30 sheeting
Herringbone
Shade A (0.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade B (1.5%)
√
√
√
√
√
√
Shade C (4%)
√
√
√
√
√
√Then the fabrics were dyed by using pad dyeing method with the help of lab dyeing machine where the liquor ratio was 1 : 10 for the mentioned shade percentage (see Table1). During dyeing, standard methods were followed as prescribed by the manufacturers. The pH of the dye bath was adjusted by soda ash. We set the bath with substrate at room temperature 40°C and then added sample, dyes, soda ash, sequestering agent, wetting agent, anticreasing agent, leveling agent, and salt. Dyeing was done very quickly by pad dyeing machine. Total 18 fabric samples (9 mercerized and 9 unmercerized) were dyed by the same process. Then all the dyed samples were collected separately and covered with polybag and then put on the oven and kept for 30 mins for drying. After that we took the fabric after treatment. Then neutralization (by 1 g/L acetic acid), soap wash (by 1 g/L detergent), hot wash, and cold wash were done sequentially. Then fabric was squeezed in the cold padder for 1 min; at last calendaring was done on the fabric for 2 mins. Dyeing recipe for different shades of reactive dyes is given in Table 2.Table 2
Recipe used for dyeing.
Shade A (0.5%)
Shade B (1.5%)
Shade C (4%)
Glauber salt = 20 g/L
Glauber salt = 50 g/L
Glauber salt = 70 g/L
Soda ash = 5 g/L
Soda ash = 15 g/L
Soda ash = 20 g/L
Wetting agent: 1 g/L; leveling agent: 1 g/L; anticreasing agent: 1 g/L; material to liquor ratio = 1 : 10; temperature: 70°C (these parameters were used for three shades).


## 2.2.3. Measurement of Depth of Shade of Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabrics

The reflectance values at all wavelengths were measured by using a spectrophotometer. White mercerized and unmercerized fabrics were taken as standard and depth of shade was calculated using the built-in software of the computer color matching system.


## 2.2.4. Measurement of Color Fastness to Wash

ISO standards 105-C02 method was followed for wash fastness test. A specimen of 10 × 4 cm was attached with a multifiber fabric strip. Washing solution containing 5 g/L detergent was taken in the laboratory dyeing machine with a liquor ratio of 1 : 50. The specimen was treated for 45 minutes at 50 ± 20°C. The specimen was then removed and rinsed in normal water and dried in shadow. The change in color and degree of staining was evaluated visually using geometric grey scale given in Table3.Table 3
Effect of shade % on mercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Dye at fabric (depth of shade)
Dye loss
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.36%
0.14%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.17%
0.33%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.31%
0.19%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
1.08%
0.42%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.84%
0.66%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.18%
0.32%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
2.80%
1.20%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
2.1%
1.90%
Herringbone
4%
3.1%
0.90%


## 3. Results and Discussion

Spectrophotometer was used to determine the color strength of mercerized and unmercerized fabrics individually. The effects of color strength on mercerized and unmercerized fabric with different fabric structures are discussed below sequentially.


### 3.1. Effect of Shade % on Mercerized Fabric

Effects of different mercerized fabric structures and different shades are shown in the Table3 and Figures 1–3. It was observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed maximum dye compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric. So for light shade (A = 0.5%), 20
∗
20 fabric is better than other two fabrics. Sequence of dye absorption for shade A (0.5%) is 20
∗
20 sheeting > herringbone > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Figure 1
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 2
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 3
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 4% shade.If we consider shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade B (1.5%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade C (4%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.


### 3.2. Effect of Shade % on Unmercerized Fabric

Effects of different unmercerized fabric structures along with different shades are shown in the Table4 and Figures 4–6. It was observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric. So for light shade (A = 0.5%) 20
∗
20 fabric is better than other two fabrics. Sequence of dye absorption for shade A (0.5%) is 20
∗
20 sheeting > herringbone > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Table 4
Effect of shade % on unmercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Dye at fabric (depth of shade)
Dye loss
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.28%
0.22%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.14%
0.36%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.16%
0.34%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
0.91%
0.59%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.63%
0.86%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.07%
0.43%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
1.75%
2.25%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
1.64%
2.36%
Herringbone
4%
1.87%
2.13%Figure 4
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 5
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 6
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 4% shade.If we consider shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade B (1.5%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting. Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures. 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade C (4%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.


### 3.3. Comparative Effects on Depth of Shade of Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabric

Comparative effects on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric structures and shades are shown in the Table5 and Figures 7–9. In case of all the shades it was found that depth of shade of mercerized fabric was better than unmercerized fabric. It was also observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed maximum dye for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbed more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric.Table 5
Comparative results of mercerized and unmercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Depth of shade of mercerized fabric
Depth of shade of unmercerized fabric
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.36%
0.28%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.17%
0.14%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.31%
0.16%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
1.08%
0.91%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.84%
0.63%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.18%
1.07%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
2.80%
1.75%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
2.1%
1.64%
Herringbone
4%
3.1%
1.87%Figure 7
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 8
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 9
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 4% shade.So for light shade (A = 0.5%),20
∗
20 fabric was better than other two fabrics.In case of shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbed the maximum dyestuffs for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to the other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone was less than those two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures.Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbed maximum dye for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone was less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 was more than other two structures.


### 3.4. Analysis of Color Fastness to Wash

Reactive dyes on cellulose fiber have superior washing fastness property [9]. Here for all fabric structures and 0.5% shade, rating for color change was found to be 4/5 to 5 that means good to excellent or excellent, which were shown in Table 6. In case of shade 1.5%, color staining ratings were found to be 4/5 to 4 that means good to excellent or good. In case of shade 4%, color staining color change ratings were found to be 4 (good). The reason of good washing fastness in terms of both color change and color staining was due to the formation of chemical bonding (covalent bonds) between cotton polymer and dye molecules [10].Table 6
Rating of color fatness to wash.
Fabric structure
Shade %
Color staining
Color change
Acetate
Cotton
Nylon
Polyester
Acrylic
Wool
2
0
∗
20 sheeting
0.5%
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
1.5%
4-5
4
4
4-5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
30
∗
30 sheeting
0.5%
4/5
4
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
1.5%
4/5
4
4
4/5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Herringbone
0.5%
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
5
1.5%
4/5
4
4
4/5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


## 3.1. Effect of Shade % on Mercerized Fabric

Effects of different mercerized fabric structures and different shades are shown in the Table3 and Figures 1–3. It was observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed maximum dye compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric. So for light shade (A = 0.5%), 20
∗
20 fabric is better than other two fabrics. Sequence of dye absorption for shade A (0.5%) is 20
∗
20 sheeting > herringbone > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Figure 1
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 2
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 3
Effect of color strength on different mercerized fabric for 4% shade.If we consider shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade B (1.5%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade C (4%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.


## 3.2. Effect of Shade % on Unmercerized Fabric

Effects of different unmercerized fabric structures along with different shades are shown in the Table4 and Figures 4–6. It was observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric. So for light shade (A = 0.5%) 20
∗
20 fabric is better than other two fabrics. Sequence of dye absorption for shade A (0.5%) is 20
∗
20 sheeting > herringbone > 30
∗
30 sheeting.Table 4
Effect of shade % on unmercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Dye at fabric (depth of shade)
Dye loss
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.28%
0.22%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.14%
0.36%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.16%
0.34%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
0.91%
0.59%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.63%
0.86%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.07%
0.43%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
1.75%
2.25%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
1.64%
2.36%
Herringbone
4%
1.87%
2.13%Figure 4
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 5
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 6
Effect of color strength on different unmercerized fabric for 4% shade.If we consider shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade B (1.5%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting. Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbs maximum dye compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone is less than other two structures. 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures. So for shade C (4%) sequence of dye absorption is herringbone > 20
∗
20 sheeting > 30
∗
30 sheeting.


## 3.3. Comparative Effects on Depth of Shade of Mercerized and Unmercerized Fabric

Comparative effects on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric structures and shades are shown in the Table5 and Figures 7–9. In case of all the shades it was found that depth of shade of mercerized fabric was better than unmercerized fabric. It was also observed that, in case of shade A (0.5%), 20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed maximum dye for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to other two structures. Herringbone fabric absorbed more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric.Table 5
Comparative results of mercerized and unmercerized fabric.
Shade %
Fabric structure
Dye at solution
Depth of shade of mercerized fabric
Depth of shade of unmercerized fabric
A = 0.5
20 × 20 sheeting
0.5%
0.36%
0.28%
30 × 30 sheeting
0.5%
0.17%
0.14%
Herringbone
0.5%
0.31%
0.16%
B = 1.5
20 × 20 sheeting
1.5%
1.08%
0.91%
30 × 30 sheeting
1.5%
0.84%
0.63%
Herringbone
1.5%
1.18%
1.07%
C = 4
20 × 20 sheeting
4%
2.80%
1.75%
30 × 30 sheeting
4%
2.1%
1.64%
Herringbone
4%
3.1%
1.87%Figure 7
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 0.5% shade.Figure 8
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 1.5% shade.Figure 9
Effect of color strength on different mercerized and unmercerized fabric for 4% shade.So for light shade (A = 0.5%),20
∗
20 fabric was better than other two fabrics.In case of shade B (1.5%) it was found that herringbone fabric absorbed the maximum dyestuffs for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to the other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone was less than those two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbs more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade B (1.5%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 is more than other two structures.Considering shade C (4%) it was observed that herringbone fabric absorbed maximum dye for both mercerized and unmercerized fabric compared to other two structures and dye loss % of herringbone was less than other two structures.20
∗
20 sheeting fabric absorbed more dye than 30
∗
30 sheeting fabric and in case of shade C (4%) dye loss % of 30
∗
30 was more than other two structures.


## 3.4. Analysis of Color Fastness to Wash

Reactive dyes on cellulose fiber have superior washing fastness property [9]. Here for all fabric structures and 0.5% shade, rating for color change was found to be 4/5 to 5 that means good to excellent or excellent, which were shown in Table 6. In case of shade 1.5%, color staining ratings were found to be 4/5 to 4 that means good to excellent or good. In case of shade 4%, color staining color change ratings were found to be 4 (good). The reason of good washing fastness in terms of both color change and color staining was due to the formation of chemical bonding (covalent bonds) between cotton polymer and dye molecules [10].Table 6
Rating of color fatness to wash.
Fabric structure
Shade %
Color staining
Color change
Acetate
Cotton
Nylon
Polyester
Acrylic
Wool
2
0
∗
20 sheeting
0.5%
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
1.5%
4-5
4
4
4-5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
30
∗
30 sheeting
0.5%
4/5
4
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
1.5%
4/5
4
4
4/5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Herringbone
0.5%
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
4/5
5
1.5%
4/5
4
4
4/5
4
4
4
4%
4
4
4
4
4
4
4


## 4. Conclusion

This study was planned to compare the depths of shade between mercerized and unmercerized fabric as well as to check the fastness properties among woven fabrics with different structures. In this research work it was found that, with the increment of shade %, color fastness properties are affected for different fabric structures. Again it was also observed with the increment of shade % of cotton woven fabric a considerable change on depth of color was found for different fabric structures. At last we can say that there is a considerable effect of fabric structure on depth of shade and color fastness when cotton woven fabrics were dyed with different shade %, that is, 0.5%, 1.5%, and 4%. It can be concluded that herringbone fabric is better for both states: mercerized and unmercerized. Here mercerized fabric shows better depth of shade in reactive dyeing for all shades and all fabric structures.



---

*Source: 9739380-2016-10-10.xml*