# Modified Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer for Increasing Rice Variety Tolerance toward Submergence Stress

Authors: Gribaldi Gribaldi; Nurlaili Nurlaili; Nurmala Dewi; Ekawati Danial; Firnawati Sakalena; Rujito A. Suwignyo
Journal: International Journal of Agronomy
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

This research was conducted from July to October 2015, using Randomized Block Design with two treatment factors and three replications for each treatment. The first factor was rice varieties (V): V1 = IR 64; V2 = Inpara 5. The second factor was fertilizer (N): N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; and N2: 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting; the rest was given at 42 days after planting. The submergence was during 7–14 days after planting; N3 = the entire dose of N fertilizer that was given during planting, N4 = 1/2 the dose of N fertilizer that was given during planting, and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. The submergence was during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting. The results showed that the management of nitrogen fertilizer application had effect on rice growth and production which experienced dirty water submergence stress; the application of 1/2 dose of N fertilizer given during planting had the best effect on rice growth and production; the longer the submergence period for rice variety, the higher the effect on rice growth and production.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Food crop production, especially rice (Oryza sativa L.), should be increased in annual basis according to the increase of population growth. The increase of production can be done through productivity improvement at submergence stress prone areas which is considered as the main constraint in rice crop cultivation. The area of rice production centers which are mostly located in lowland areas would be extremely vulnerable to the growing possibility of flooding [1]. According to [2], submergence that causes stress on rice crop at South Asia and Southeast Asia areas was estimated of about 15 million hectares per year, whereas flood-prone rice field areas at South Sumatra were 124,465 ha [3].Submergence stress on crop causes the obstacle of crop growth and production. Estimated yield loss due to flood was about 1.1 million tons of unhulled rice per year or equivalent to yield loss of 0.66 million tons of hulled rice [4]. In addition, [5] showed that rice crop which experienced submergence stress can decrease its grain yield with magnitude of 17.5% compared to the rice crop without submergence stress. One solution to overcome this problem is through development of high yield rice varieties that are tolerant to submergence stress.As shown in Table4, rice productivity in areas planted in this way is low and unstable, averaging < 2.0 t ha−1 in rainfed lowlands and <1.5 t ha−1 in flood-prone areas, compared with yields of >5.0 t ha−1 in input-intensive irrigated systems [6, 7]. This results in serious crop losses and sometimes leads to severe food shortages in flood-affected regions [8].Rice variety of IR 64 was developed by IRRI in 2006 which was subsequently converted into IR 64Sub-1 (Inpara 5) variety by transferringSub-1 gene from FR13A species which is tolerant to submergence condition. This variety is able to decrease harvest loss risk during wet season due to unpredictable change of climate [2].The decrease of unhulled rice yield due to the submergence for rice variety containing Sub-1 gene was lower than the rice variety which does not contain Sub-1 gene. The yield decrease on IR 64 rice varietySub-1 was 16 percent, whereas IR 64 rice variety withoutSub-1 gen was 39 percent [9]. According to [4], rice yield loss was about 30 percent due to the submergence condition and if this loss can be reduced to less than 10 percent through agronomical treatment, then it has high significant contribution for farmers and increment of national rice production.In addition to the use of tolerant rice variety to submergence stress, proper fertilizing technique also can minimize the decrease of rice yield due to the submergence condition. Fertilizing treatment before crop was submerged might maintain crop survival at submergence condition. According to [10], N fertilizing might be a proper measure to minimize negative impact from submergence stress on crop. Management treatment of nitrogen fertilizer application will give significant effect on crop height and height increment rate of rice crop. These two parameters on rice crop usually will be more affected with submergence condition of more than three days [11]. The stem length increment rate during occurrence of submergence stress had significant effect on rice crop tolerance and crop recovery rate after submergence stress [12, 13]. Moreover, study results by [14] showed that rice varieties given half dose of Urea during planting period added to (Si + Zn) fertilizer tend to show better vegetative and generative growths.The research objective was to determine the best fertilization that can increase rice crop tolerance toward submergence stress.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Experiment Site

This research was conducted from July to October 2015 at Experimental Plot of Agricultural Faculty, Baturaja University. Research station is situated at altitude 13 m above mean sea level.


### 2.2. Experiment Design

The experimental design used in this research was Randomized Block Design with two treatment factors and three replications for each treatment as well as one crop clump for each treatment unit. The first factor was rice varieties (V) consisting of V1 = IR 64 and V2 = Inpara 5. The second factor was fertilizer (N) treatments consisting of N0 = without submergence: that is, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting (DAP), N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: for submergence during 7–14 DAP, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 DAP; N3: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 DAP, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 DAP, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 DAP.


### 2.3. Implementation of Field Research

Rice variety seeds were incubated for 3 days and after germination period they were put into plastic trays media with dimension of 40 cm in length, 30 cm in width, and 13 cm in depth. These trays previously were filled with 15 kg of lowland swamp soil treated with fertilizers of N, P, K, Si, and Zn as well as manure at doses of 60, 40, 40, 30, and 20 kg·ha−1 as well as 10 ton·ha−1, respectively [15]. Seeds of 21 days old within seedling trays were pulled out and planted in polybag plastic with one rice crop seed per polybag containing 10 kg of lowland swamp soil that had previously been submerged for about 30 days. These planting media were added to fertilizers as follows: full dose of N=46 kg·ha−1, half dose of N=23 kg·ha−1, SP 36 = 128 kg·ha−1, and KCl = 100 kg·ha−1. These fertilizers were submerged into soil at depth of 10 cm. Submergence was done by putting rice crops into tray that had been filled with dirty water (equivalent to 500 g soil/100 l water) with submergence period of 7 days. Minimum water submergence was 15 cm above plant surface. Rearing was in form of maintaining water submergence height during treatment period.


### 2.4. Yield and Observation

Observation of agronomical characteristics consisted of percentage of surviving plant (%), plant height (cm), number of productive tillers, numbers per clump, plant dry matter weight per clump (g), and grain yield per clump (g). Yield components consisted of number of grains per panicle, percentage of filled grains per panicle (%), and 100-grain weight (g).


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Mean values were calculated for each of the measured variables, and ANOVA was used to assess the treatment effects. When ANOVA indicated a significantF-value, multiple comparisons of mean values were performed by the least significant difference test at α = 0.05. Relationship between variables observations is sought by correlation. Data were processed using SAS program Portable 9.1.3 for the F test and SPSS 19 for correlation.


## 2.1. Experiment Site

This research was conducted from July to October 2015 at Experimental Plot of Agricultural Faculty, Baturaja University. Research station is situated at altitude 13 m above mean sea level.


## 2.2. Experiment Design

The experimental design used in this research was Randomized Block Design with two treatment factors and three replications for each treatment as well as one crop clump for each treatment unit. The first factor was rice varieties (V) consisting of V1 = IR 64 and V2 = Inpara 5. The second factor was fertilizer (N) treatments consisting of N0 = without submergence: that is, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting (DAP), N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: for submergence during 7–14 DAP, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 DAP; N3: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 DAP, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 DAP, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 DAP.


## 2.3. Implementation of Field Research

Rice variety seeds were incubated for 3 days and after germination period they were put into plastic trays media with dimension of 40 cm in length, 30 cm in width, and 13 cm in depth. These trays previously were filled with 15 kg of lowland swamp soil treated with fertilizers of N, P, K, Si, and Zn as well as manure at doses of 60, 40, 40, 30, and 20 kg·ha−1 as well as 10 ton·ha−1, respectively [15]. Seeds of 21 days old within seedling trays were pulled out and planted in polybag plastic with one rice crop seed per polybag containing 10 kg of lowland swamp soil that had previously been submerged for about 30 days. These planting media were added to fertilizers as follows: full dose of N=46 kg·ha−1, half dose of N=23 kg·ha−1, SP 36 = 128 kg·ha−1, and KCl = 100 kg·ha−1. These fertilizers were submerged into soil at depth of 10 cm. Submergence was done by putting rice crops into tray that had been filled with dirty water (equivalent to 500 g soil/100 l water) with submergence period of 7 days. Minimum water submergence was 15 cm above plant surface. Rearing was in form of maintaining water submergence height during treatment period.


## 2.4. Yield and Observation

Observation of agronomical characteristics consisted of percentage of surviving plant (%), plant height (cm), number of productive tillers, numbers per clump, plant dry matter weight per clump (g), and grain yield per clump (g). Yield components consisted of number of grains per panicle, percentage of filled grains per panicle (%), and 100-grain weight (g).


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

Mean values were calculated for each of the measured variables, and ANOVA was used to assess the treatment effects. When ANOVA indicated a significantF-value, multiple comparisons of mean values were performed by the least significant difference test at α = 0.05. Relationship between variables observations is sought by correlation. Data were processed using SAS program Portable 9.1.3 for the F test and SPSS 19 for correlation.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Soil Chemical Properties Prior to Treatment

Analysis results of soil chemical properties prior to treatment (Table2) showed that soil used in this research were lowland swamp soil with very acid reaction, low C-organic content, and low total-N content. Low availability of phosphorus nutrient and low K-dd in this soil showed that effort of fertilizer application could overcome low nutrients availability and could increase rice crop yield.


### 3.2. Percentage of Survive Plant

Percentage of live crops decreased in IR 64 varieties which experienced two times soaking (N3, N4) compared with one time soaking (N1, N2) (Table2). While Inpara 5 varieties have a high percentage of live plants (100%) despite having two times soaking. Percentage of live crops in treatment of IR 64 varieties treated with full N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest live plant percentage, which was 66.7 percent.


### 3.3. Plant Height

With the stress of the soaking effects on plant height at 42 hst observation, plant height of rice varieties having two times soaking periods (N3, N4) decreased compared to one time immersion (N1, N2) (Table3). Plant height of two rice varieties in the same immersion conditions was not significant for each fertilizer treatment but tended to differ significantly between the immersion treatments. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest plant height of 85.2 cm and the greatest plant height in treatment was given by only 1/2 the dose of N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was administered at 42 hst with 7–14 hst immersion (V1N2), which was 108.3 cm, and the plant height in this treatment showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V1N0).


### 3.4. Number of Productive Tillers

The number of productive tillers decreased in the rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one time immersion (N1, N2) (Table3). Two rice varieties experiencing the same immersion conditions resulted in a number of no significant difference productive tillers for each fertilization treatment, but significantly different for the immersion treatment. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose of N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest number of productive tillers, that is, 13.2 tillers, the highest number of tillers in the treatment of Inpara 5 was given 1/2 dose N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was given at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V2N2), which was 30.8 tillers; besides, the number of productive tillers in this treatment showed no significant difference with treatment without immersion (V2N0).


### 3.5. Plant Dry Matter Weight

Plant dry matter weight was decreased in rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one immersion (N1, N2) (Figure1). Two rice varieties experiencing the same immersion conditions resulting in different dry weight of plants were not significant for each fertilization treatment but differed significantly for immersion treatment. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest dry weight plant, that is, 37.5 g/clump, and highest dry weight in treatment Inpara 5 which was given 1/2 fertilizer dose N at planting time, and the rest was administered at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V1N2), which was 117,5 g/clump; besides, the amount of dry weight of plant in this treatment showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V2N0).Figure 1
Plant dry matter weight at the end of research for two rice varieties and fertilizing treatment at condition of dirty water submergence stress. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3, with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 27.9.


### 3.6. Yield and Yield Components

Arrangement of nitrogen fertilizer supply affects the yield and component of grain yield per clump. Results and components of grain yield per clump were decreased in rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one immersion (N1, N2) (Figure2 and Table 5). Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest grain yield, that is, 58.3 g/clump and highest grain yield on treatment Inpara 5 which was given 1/2 dose N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was given at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V1N2), which was 88.6 g/clump; besides, the grain yield on this treatment also showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V2N0).Figure 2
Fertilizing treatment effect for two rice varieties on grain yield (a) and relative grain yield (b) at condition of dirty water submergence stress. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 28.7.
(a)
(b)Furthermore, there is a very strong relationship pattern between grain yield per clump with dry weight of plant per clump, with the equationY=55,137+0,259X: R2=0,817 (Figure 3). The higher the dry weight of the plant, the higher the yield of grain obtained.Figure 3
Relationship pattern between plant dry matter weight and grain yield.R2∗=0,817 is the value of the goodness of fit between grain yield per clump and dry weight of plant per clump.


## 3.1. Soil Chemical Properties Prior to Treatment

Analysis results of soil chemical properties prior to treatment (Table2) showed that soil used in this research were lowland swamp soil with very acid reaction, low C-organic content, and low total-N content. Low availability of phosphorus nutrient and low K-dd in this soil showed that effort of fertilizer application could overcome low nutrients availability and could increase rice crop yield.


## 3.2. Percentage of Survive Plant

Percentage of live crops decreased in IR 64 varieties which experienced two times soaking (N3, N4) compared with one time soaking (N1, N2) (Table2). While Inpara 5 varieties have a high percentage of live plants (100%) despite having two times soaking. Percentage of live crops in treatment of IR 64 varieties treated with full N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest live plant percentage, which was 66.7 percent.


## 3.3. Plant Height

With the stress of the soaking effects on plant height at 42 hst observation, plant height of rice varieties having two times soaking periods (N3, N4) decreased compared to one time immersion (N1, N2) (Table3). Plant height of two rice varieties in the same immersion conditions was not significant for each fertilizer treatment but tended to differ significantly between the immersion treatments. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest plant height of 85.2 cm and the greatest plant height in treatment was given by only 1/2 the dose of N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was administered at 42 hst with 7–14 hst immersion (V1N2), which was 108.3 cm, and the plant height in this treatment showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V1N0).


## 3.4. Number of Productive Tillers

The number of productive tillers decreased in the rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one time immersion (N1, N2) (Table3). Two rice varieties experiencing the same immersion conditions resulted in a number of no significant difference productive tillers for each fertilization treatment, but significantly different for the immersion treatment. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose of N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest number of productive tillers, that is, 13.2 tillers, the highest number of tillers in the treatment of Inpara 5 was given 1/2 dose N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was given at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V2N2), which was 30.8 tillers; besides, the number of productive tillers in this treatment showed no significant difference with treatment without immersion (V2N0).


## 3.5. Plant Dry Matter Weight

Plant dry matter weight was decreased in rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one immersion (N1, N2) (Figure1). Two rice varieties experiencing the same immersion conditions resulting in different dry weight of plants were not significant for each fertilization treatment but differed significantly for immersion treatment. Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest dry weight plant, that is, 37.5 g/clump, and highest dry weight in treatment Inpara 5 which was given 1/2 fertilizer dose N at planting time, and the rest was administered at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V1N2), which was 117,5 g/clump; besides, the amount of dry weight of plant in this treatment showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V2N0).Figure 1
Plant dry matter weight at the end of research for two rice varieties and fertilizing treatment at condition of dirty water submergence stress. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3, with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 27.9.


## 3.6. Yield and Yield Components

Arrangement of nitrogen fertilizer supply affects the yield and component of grain yield per clump. Results and components of grain yield per clump were decreased in rice varieties with two times immersion (N3, N4) compared to one immersion (N1, N2) (Figure2 and Table 5). Treatment of IR 64 varieties given full dose N fertilization with immersion of 7–14 and 28–35 hst (V1N3) had the lowest grain yield, that is, 58.3 g/clump and highest grain yield on treatment Inpara 5 which was given 1/2 dose N fertilizer at planting time, and the rest was given at 42 hst with immersion of 7–14 hst (V1N2), which was 88.6 g/clump; besides, the grain yield on this treatment also showed no significant difference with nonimmersion treatment (V2N0).Figure 2
Fertilizing treatment effect for two rice varieties on grain yield (a) and relative grain yield (b) at condition of dirty water submergence stress. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: for submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 28.7.
(a)
(b)Furthermore, there is a very strong relationship pattern between grain yield per clump with dry weight of plant per clump, with the equationY=55,137+0,259X: R2=0,817 (Figure 3). The higher the dry weight of the plant, the higher the yield of grain obtained.Figure 3
Relationship pattern between plant dry matter weight and grain yield.R2∗=0,817 is the value of the goodness of fit between grain yield per clump and dry weight of plant per clump.


## 4. Discussion

Analysis results of soil chemical properties prior to treatment (Table1) showed that soil used in this research was lowland swamp soil with very acid reaction, low C-organic content, and low total-N content. Low availability of phosphorus nutrient and low K-dd in this soil showed that effort of fertilizer application could overcome low nutrients availability and could increase rice crop yield.Table 1
Analysis results of soil properties before treatment.
Analyses
Unit
Result
Status
pH H2O
4.03
Very acidic
C-organic
%
1.82
Low
N-total
%
0.17
Low
P-Bray I
ppm
13.65
Low
K-dd
me⋅100 g−1
0.26
Low
Na
me⋅100 g−1
0.22
Low
Ca
me⋅100 g−1
1.30
Very low
Mg
me⋅100 g−1
0.25
Very low
CEC
me⋅100 g−1
13.08
Low
Al-dd
me⋅100 g−1
1.00
Very low
Source: Soil Science Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Unsri, 2015.Table 2
Percentage of survive plant (%) of two rice varieties and fertilizing treatment in condition of dirty water submergence stress.
Treatment
N0
N1
N2
N3
N4
IR 64
100.0b
100.0b
100.0b
66.7a
83.3ab
Inpara 5
100.0b
100.0b
100.0b
100.0b
100.0b
Notes. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 26.4.Table 3
Plant height (cm) at 42 days after planting of two rice varieties and fertilizing treatment at condition of dirty water submergence stress.
Treatment
N0
N1
N2
N3
N4
IR64
107.0ab
104.2ab
108.3b
85.2a
99.3ab
Inpara 5
109.1ab
103.5ab
107.5ab
90.7ab
101.0ab
Notes. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: for submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant difference or LSD0.05: 22.8.Table 4
Productive tiller numbers of two rice varieties and fertilizing treatment at condition of dirty water submergence stress.
Treatment
N0
N1
N2
N3
N4
IR64
26.0c
25.2bc
25.7c
13.2a
15.8a
Inpara 5
27.7c
26.7c
30.8c
16.7a
18.7ab
Notes. N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting. Numbers followed by the same characters are not significantly different at least significant Difference or LSD0.05: 7.0.Table 5
The fertilizing effect for two rice varieties on several yield components at condition of dirty water submergence stress.
Treatment
Inpara 5
IR64
1
2
3
1
2
3
N0
130.8
93.0
2.39
128.5
91.0
2.49
N1
123.2
90.1
2.37
118.7
91.7
2.38
N2
128.9
93.2
2.36
129.7
92.6
2.42
N3
101.3
89.5
2.32
110.8
89.2
2.37
N4
112.3
91.8
2.44
122.1
91.1
2.41
Remarks: 1: the number of grains per panicle (grains), 2: percentage of grain pithy (%), 3: grain weight of 100 grains (g). N0: without submergence, all N fertilizer was given during planting; N1: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, N fertilizer was given during planting; N2: with submergence during 7–14 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting; N3: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, all N fertilizer dose was given during planting; N4: with submergence during 7–14 and 28–35 days after planting, 1/2 dose of N fertilizer was given during planting and the rest was given at 42 days after planting.The immersion stress has an effect on the tolerance, growth, and yield of grain per clump of rice plants, as seen from the changes of life plant percentage, plant height, number of productive tillers, dry weight of plant and also some components of yield.Crop tolerance is the ability of plants to avoid or reduce damage to crops with the presence of soaking stress so as to grow and produce as in plants that do not experience the immersion stress. The longer and more frequent the rice plants experience soaking stress, the greater the damage that occurs in plants. The regulation of N fertilizer application statistically was not significant but it showed a tendency of increasing the percentage of live plants by 16.6 percent. According to [10], N fertilizer application was the proper measure to decrease negative effect of submergence stress on crop. Moreover, according to [16], recovery capacity highly depends on plant capability to adapt quickly to certain condition after they experience flooding stress. In addition, [4] stated that better recovery for rice plant which experienced submergence stress was indicated by faster new tillers emergence so that plant had relatively same tiller numbers or even higher tiller numbers than that of plant which did not experience submergence stress.Management of N fertilizer application had effect on rice plant height. Rice variety which was treated with half dose of N fertilizer during planting time (and the rest was given at 42 days after planting) either received one time submergence or two times submergence and tends to have higher plant height than that of other fertilizing treatments. IR 64 rice variety even with one time submergence had higher plant height than without submergence treatment with magnitude of 107.5 cm. According to [11], management of N fertilizer application had effect on plant height and increment rate of plant height. In addition, [12] stated that plant height after flooding stress period was more affected by rice variety than by fertilization treatment. The papers [17–19] also stated that the increase in plant height becomes more noticeable with prolonged submergence.Rice varieties which experienced submergence stress treated with half dose of N fertilizer during planting time (and the rest was given at 42 days after planting) tend to have higher plant dry matter weight than that of other fertilizing treatments; even IR 64 and Inpara 5 varieties which experienced one time submergence tend to have higher plant dry matter weight than that of without submergence with magnitude of 86.7 g and 117.2 g, respectively. This was due to the fact that varieties treated with this fertilizer had higher plant height and higher tiller numbers than the other fertilizing treatments so that dry matter weight of these varieties was also high. According to [20], the weight increasing of plant dry is an indicator of growth and development of increasing plant. In addition, [21] stated that postsubmergence stem dry weight correlated positively and strongly with survival (r = 0,97).Inpara 5 variety treated with half dose of N fertilizer during planting time (and the rest was given at 42 days after planting) showed higher grain yield than that of other treatments, either for one time submergence or for two times submergence with grain yield of 88.6 g and 73.4 g, respectively. This was in accordance with high change of plant dry matter weight in this treatment resulting in high capability of plant to distribute assimilates into generative organ so that stem can produce more full grain which was shown by the change of several yield components on this treatment (Table5). Study results from [22] showed that fertilization with half dose of Urea fertilizer during planting as well as Si and Zn in which the remainder was applied at 42 days after planting had produced the highest grain yield for all tested varieties for flooding period of 7 to 14 days after planting.Moreover, there was very close relationship pattern between grain yield per clump and plants dry matter weight per clump expressed by equation ofY=55.137+0.259X: R2=0.817 (Figure 3). The higher the plants dry matter weight, the higher the obtained grain yield. In addition, the research result of [23] reported that the grain yield also has very real relationship to the nitrogen content.


## 5. Conclusions

The results showed that management of nitrogen fertilizer application had effect on rice growth and production which experienced dirty water submergence stress. Application of half dose of N fertilizer during planting time (and the rest was given at 42 days after planting) was the best treatment in terms of rice growth and production. The longer the submergence period on rice variety, the bigger the effect on rice growth and production.



---

*Source: 9734036-2017-07-10.xml*