# Optimization of Drying Process for Squid-Laver Snack by a Combined Method of Fuzzy Synthetic and Response Surface Methodology

Authors: Chang-Cheng Zhao; Gui-Hun Jiang; Jong-Bang Eun
Journal: Journal of Food Quality
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of drying temperature (50–70°C) and drying time (3–5 h) on the physical properties and quality of squid-laver snack (SLS) using response surface methodology combined with a synthetic evaluation method to optimize the drying process conditions. Moisture content, water activity, color (L⁎, a⁎, b⁎), shear force, and overall acceptability were evaluated as responses. Increased drying times and higher temperatures significantly reduced the moisture content and water activity of SLS from 9.07% to 4.76% and 0.136 to 0.056, respectively (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the L⁎ and a⁎ values under different drying conditions. The quadratic effect of temperature and time was observed for the b⁎ value and overall acceptability of SLS. For shear force, a quadratic and interaction term for drying temperature and time on shear force was observed. In conclusion, the recommended optimal hot air-drying conditions for SLS are temperature and time of 70°C and 3 h, respectively.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dried squid are popular seafood in Asian countries including China, Korea, and Japan because of their ease of availability and taste [1]. More than 10 species of squid have become the main fishing and consumer targets. Among them, jumbo squid and neon flying squid are two of the most important commercial species [2]. Typically, squid are not only consumed as fresh products but rather are processed into dried squid for storage and/or distribution. Recently, dried squid has been used as a common ingredient in many products because it contains high-quality protein and polyunsaturated fatty acids, which have increased the demand for dried squid [3]. The brown seaweed laver is also a popular marine alga in the cuisine of many countries (García Salgado et al. 2016). It is considered a medical food of the 21st century because of its high contents of minerals, vitamins, trace elements, and bioactive substances [4]. Approximately 1500 brown seaweed laver species are found in nature and several have been used in many products such aszicai (a traditional Chinese dish),nori (a popular Japanese product), andkim (a traditional Korean food ingredient) [5]. However, seaweed laver is primarily consumed in the dried, roasted, and seasoned forms; few seaweed laver snacks have been developed, limiting its consumption. Recently, consumption of snacks and side dishes for those who consume lavers has increased. Therefore, new products containing dried squid, laver, and other ingredients such as almond, seasoning, and corn syrup should be developed.Generally, squid meat easily becomes tough and hard and splinters after drying because of its high content of insoluble myostromin, which limits the consumption of traditional dried squid by the elderly and infants [6]. Thus, it is necessary to soften dried squid to develop a new squid-laver snack (SLS). Some methods including soaking in hot water or alkaline solution have been reported for tenderizing or softening dried squid and are widely used to soften dried squid before cooking [1]. However, these methods cannot be applied to low-moisture content snacks. Thus, in this study, we used physical methods to mill dried squid and passed the squid through 7 meshes to maintain chewiness after pretreatment based on our preliminary trials.Hot air-drying is the most widely used drying method for heating materials and decreases the moisture content of the materials [7]. Squid-laver snacks have low-moisture content and are a ready-to-eat snack; it is necessary to use processing steps for drying, including the use of a proper inlet air temperature and drying time. Response surface methodology (RSM) is a powerful tool for evaluating the interactive effects among different factors and determining the optimum conditions for desirable responses [8]. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation models based on fuzzy set theory have been used by a number of researchers in various environmental areas, land evaluation, and other fields [9]. Fuzzy evaluation methods process all the components according to predetermined weights and decrease the fuzziness by using the membership function; therefore, sensitivity is quite high compared with the other index evaluation techniques [10]. The aim of this study was to optimize the hot air-drying conditions to improve the quality of SLS using RSM coupled with fuzzy synthetic evaluation method.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Raw Materials

Jumbo dried squids were purchased from a local market in Gwangju, South Korea. The weight of each dried squid was approximately 90 g. Seasoned laver was purchased from DongWang Co., Ltd. (Busan, South Korea). Dried squid and seasoned laver were stored at −20°C until use.


### 2.2. Pretreatment of Dried Squid

Dried squid were cut into small pieces of approximately5×5 cm with a sharp knife and stored at −80°C for approximately 5 h for hardening. After freezing, the dried squid were immediately milled (DH 200, Korea Trailer, Co., Ltd., Cheonan, South Korea) and passed through a 7-mesh screen. These samples were stored at −20°C until use.


### 2.3. Sample Preparation

The SLS were prepared using dried squid, laver, sliced almonds, and sesame following the formulation shown in Table1. The binding agent consisted of corn syrup, starch, and other seasoning ingredients such as honey, salt, and monosodium glutamate. Milled squid, sliced almond, and sesame were placed between the two seaweed lavers whose surfaces had been smeared evenly with binging agent. The samples were cut into samples of 2×5 cm before drying (Figure 1).Table 1
Formulation of squid-laver snack (SLS).
Ingredient
Percent (%)
Seasoned laver
20.50
Milled squid
25.79
Sliced almond
12.65
Dried sesame
2.53
Binding agent
38.53
High-fructose corn syrup
17.10
Honey
7.58
Better
5.06
Salt
0.51
MSG
0.1
Waxy powder
7.58Figure 1
Process flowchart for the development of squid-laver.


### 2.4. Experimental Design for Drying Process

The hot air-drying experiment was designed based on a two-factor central composite design of RSM (Design-Expert 8.0.6 trial version). The independent variables wereX1 (hot air temperature: 50–70°) and X2 (drying time: 3–5 h) according to preliminary trials, while the responses were moisture content (Y1), water activity (Y2), shear force (Y3), L∗ (Y4), a∗ (Y5), b∗ (Y6), and overall acceptability (Y7). Table 2 shows the experimental design of the drying process.Table 2
Independent variables and their coded values used for optimization.
Runs
Drying conditions
Symbol coded
Temperature (°C)
Time (h)
×1
×2
(
1
)
50
5
−1
1
(
2
)
60
4
0
0
(
3
)
70
3
1
−1
(
4
)
45.86
4
−1.414
0
(
5
)
50
3
−1
−1
(
6
)
74.14
4
1.414
0
(
7
)
60
5.41
0
1.414
(
8
)
60
4
0
0
(
9
)
60
4
0
0
(
10
)
60
2.59
0
−1.414
(
11
)
70
5
1
1
(
12
)
60
4
0
0
(
13
)
60
4
0
0


### 2.5. Moisture Content

The air oven method was used to determine the moisture content of SLS [11].


### 2.6. Water Activity

Water activity of ground SLS was directly measured using a thermoconstanter (TH-2000, Novasina, Lachen, Switzerland) at 25°C as described by Kim et al. [12].


### 2.7. Color

The color of the SLS surface was measured using chromate (Minolta, CR-300, Osaka, Japan), and the CIE color values ofL∗ (lightness), a∗ (redness), and b∗ (yellowness) were recorded.


### 2.8. Shear Force

The shear force of SLS was measured using a Texture Analyzer (500 N, Zwick GmbH & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany) with a Warner-Bratzler shear blade with a guillotine probe. The probe was passed through the center of the SLS and the load cell, pretest speed, and test speed were 5 g, 1.0 mm/s, and 0.5 mm/s, respectively [13, 14]. The shear force was the maximum force required to break the SLS.


### 2.9. Overall Acceptability

Sensory evaluation for SLS was performed by 15 panelists as described by Norajit et al. [15] with some modifications. The panelists were students of Food Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, and consisted of 47% males and 53% females. The overall sensory characteristics were evaluated based on a 7-point scale (7 for excellent, 4 for good, and 1 for very poor).


### 2.10. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation

Fuzzy synthetic evaluation is commonly used technique to solve problems with constraints involving nonlinear functions. The method aims to solve sequences of sample problems whose solutions coverage to the solutions of the original problems [16]. To evaluate the contributions of each response including moisture content, water activity, color, shear force, and overall acceptability, the synthetic evaluation (S) and membership value (M) were used. The M values of overall acceptability, L∗, were calculated using (1), while those of moisture content, water activity, and a∗ and b∗ were calculated using (2).(1)Mij=Cij-Cmin,jCmax,j-Cmin,j,(2)Mij=Cmax,j-CijCmax,j-Cmin,j,where Cmax and Cmin are the maximum and minimum values of the response variables, i is the number of response variables according to the order of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗, and j is the number of experimental runs ranging from 1 to 13.Of those responses, moisture content was set as the most important factor and water activity as the second most important factor. By considering SLS as a ready-to-eat snack, overall acceptability was considered as the third most important factor. The shear force was set as the fourth most important factor, followed by color (L∗, a∗, and b∗). The sum of the weights of the coefficients should be 1. Thus, the weight coefficient (λ) of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗ were 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.10, 0.05, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively [17, 18]. A synthetic evaluation index (S) was calculated using (3)Sj=∑i=17λiMij,where S is the synthetic evaluation index, M is the membership value, i is the number of response variables according to the order of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗, and j is the number of experimental runs ranging from 1 to 13.


### 2.11. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were conducted in triplicate. The experimental data were statistically analyzed using Design-Expert 8.0.6 software (state-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis MN, USA). A second-order polynomial model was used to predict the response variables based on multiple linear regression analysis. The equation is shown below:(4)Y=b0+b1X1+b2X2+b12X12+b22X22+b1b2X1X2,where Y is the predicted dependent variable, b0 is a constant that fixed the response at the central point of the experiment, and b1, b2, b12, and b22 are the linear, quadratic, and interaction coefficients, respectively. X1 and X2 are independent variables.Regression analysis of the models represented by (4) and significant terms were evaluated for each response by multiple regression and variance (ANOVA) analysis, respectively. Moreover, the adequacy of the models was examined using model analysis, lack-of fit test, pure error, and R2 analysis [19, 20].


## 2.1. Raw Materials

Jumbo dried squids were purchased from a local market in Gwangju, South Korea. The weight of each dried squid was approximately 90 g. Seasoned laver was purchased from DongWang Co., Ltd. (Busan, South Korea). Dried squid and seasoned laver were stored at −20°C until use.


## 2.2. Pretreatment of Dried Squid

Dried squid were cut into small pieces of approximately5×5 cm with a sharp knife and stored at −80°C for approximately 5 h for hardening. After freezing, the dried squid were immediately milled (DH 200, Korea Trailer, Co., Ltd., Cheonan, South Korea) and passed through a 7-mesh screen. These samples were stored at −20°C until use.


## 2.3. Sample Preparation

The SLS were prepared using dried squid, laver, sliced almonds, and sesame following the formulation shown in Table1. The binding agent consisted of corn syrup, starch, and other seasoning ingredients such as honey, salt, and monosodium glutamate. Milled squid, sliced almond, and sesame were placed between the two seaweed lavers whose surfaces had been smeared evenly with binging agent. The samples were cut into samples of 2×5 cm before drying (Figure 1).Table 1
Formulation of squid-laver snack (SLS).
Ingredient
Percent (%)
Seasoned laver
20.50
Milled squid
25.79
Sliced almond
12.65
Dried sesame
2.53
Binding agent
38.53
High-fructose corn syrup
17.10
Honey
7.58
Better
5.06
Salt
0.51
MSG
0.1
Waxy powder
7.58Figure 1
Process flowchart for the development of squid-laver.


## 2.4. Experimental Design for Drying Process

The hot air-drying experiment was designed based on a two-factor central composite design of RSM (Design-Expert 8.0.6 trial version). The independent variables wereX1 (hot air temperature: 50–70°) and X2 (drying time: 3–5 h) according to preliminary trials, while the responses were moisture content (Y1), water activity (Y2), shear force (Y3), L∗ (Y4), a∗ (Y5), b∗ (Y6), and overall acceptability (Y7). Table 2 shows the experimental design of the drying process.Table 2
Independent variables and their coded values used for optimization.
Runs
Drying conditions
Symbol coded
Temperature (°C)
Time (h)
×1
×2
(
1
)
50
5
−1
1
(
2
)
60
4
0
0
(
3
)
70
3
1
−1
(
4
)
45.86
4
−1.414
0
(
5
)
50
3
−1
−1
(
6
)
74.14
4
1.414
0
(
7
)
60
5.41
0
1.414
(
8
)
60
4
0
0
(
9
)
60
4
0
0
(
10
)
60
2.59
0
−1.414
(
11
)
70
5
1
1
(
12
)
60
4
0
0
(
13
)
60
4
0
0


## 2.5. Moisture Content

The air oven method was used to determine the moisture content of SLS [11].


## 2.6. Water Activity

Water activity of ground SLS was directly measured using a thermoconstanter (TH-2000, Novasina, Lachen, Switzerland) at 25°C as described by Kim et al. [12].


## 2.7. Color

The color of the SLS surface was measured using chromate (Minolta, CR-300, Osaka, Japan), and the CIE color values ofL∗ (lightness), a∗ (redness), and b∗ (yellowness) were recorded.


## 2.8. Shear Force

The shear force of SLS was measured using a Texture Analyzer (500 N, Zwick GmbH & Co. KG, Ulm, Germany) with a Warner-Bratzler shear blade with a guillotine probe. The probe was passed through the center of the SLS and the load cell, pretest speed, and test speed were 5 g, 1.0 mm/s, and 0.5 mm/s, respectively [13, 14]. The shear force was the maximum force required to break the SLS.


## 2.9. Overall Acceptability

Sensory evaluation for SLS was performed by 15 panelists as described by Norajit et al. [15] with some modifications. The panelists were students of Food Science and Technology, Chonnam National University, and consisted of 47% males and 53% females. The overall sensory characteristics were evaluated based on a 7-point scale (7 for excellent, 4 for good, and 1 for very poor).


## 2.10. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation

Fuzzy synthetic evaluation is commonly used technique to solve problems with constraints involving nonlinear functions. The method aims to solve sequences of sample problems whose solutions coverage to the solutions of the original problems [16]. To evaluate the contributions of each response including moisture content, water activity, color, shear force, and overall acceptability, the synthetic evaluation (S) and membership value (M) were used. The M values of overall acceptability, L∗, were calculated using (1), while those of moisture content, water activity, and a∗ and b∗ were calculated using (2).(1)Mij=Cij-Cmin,jCmax,j-Cmin,j,(2)Mij=Cmax,j-CijCmax,j-Cmin,j,where Cmax and Cmin are the maximum and minimum values of the response variables, i is the number of response variables according to the order of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗, and j is the number of experimental runs ranging from 1 to 13.Of those responses, moisture content was set as the most important factor and water activity as the second most important factor. By considering SLS as a ready-to-eat snack, overall acceptability was considered as the third most important factor. The shear force was set as the fourth most important factor, followed by color (L∗, a∗, and b∗). The sum of the weights of the coefficients should be 1. Thus, the weight coefficient (λ) of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗ were 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.10, 0.05, 0.05, and 0.05, respectively [17, 18]. A synthetic evaluation index (S) was calculated using (3)Sj=∑i=17λiMij,where S is the synthetic evaluation index, M is the membership value, i is the number of response variables according to the order of moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗, and j is the number of experimental runs ranging from 1 to 13.


## 2.11. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were conducted in triplicate. The experimental data were statistically analyzed using Design-Expert 8.0.6 software (state-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis MN, USA). A second-order polynomial model was used to predict the response variables based on multiple linear regression analysis. The equation is shown below:(4)Y=b0+b1X1+b2X2+b12X12+b22X22+b1b2X1X2,where Y is the predicted dependent variable, b0 is a constant that fixed the response at the central point of the experiment, and b1, b2, b12, and b22 are the linear, quadratic, and interaction coefficients, respectively. X1 and X2 are independent variables.Regression analysis of the models represented by (4) and significant terms were evaluated for each response by multiple regression and variance (ANOVA) analysis, respectively. Moreover, the adequacy of the models was examined using model analysis, lack-of fit test, pure error, and R2 analysis [19, 20].


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Selection of Independent Variable Levels

In this study, the drying temperature (50–70°C) and drying time (3–5 h) were chosen for the hot air-drying process based on our preliminary trials. If the air temperature was too high and drying time was too long, hardening occurred and a casing formed. This may be because moisture was removed from the surface of foods being dried more rapidly than water could diffuse from the moist interior of the food particle [21]. A low drying temperature and short drying time could not effectively remove the moisture to reach the level of moisture needed for an SLS.The results of response variables, including moisture content, water activity, color (L∗, a∗, b∗), shear force, and overall acceptance under different drying conditions are reported in Table 3. The minimum R2 was 0.8, which indicated that the data fit the statistical model [22]. As shown in Table 4, a high correlation coefficient explained the goodness of fit of the experimental data for the response surface models of moisture content, water activity, b value, shear force, and overall acceptability. The 3D surface graphs for these responses were developed as a function of the two independent variables according to the significance of the responses. Multiple responses were optimized using a synthetic evaluation method [17].Table 3
Experimental values of response variables for response surface design.
Runs
Water content (%)
Water activity
L
∗
a
∗
b
∗
Shear force
Overall acceptability
(
1
)
6.65
0.116
31.12
−0.39
6.81
85.32
3.67
(
2
)
6.63
0.112
30.33
−0.3
6.22
107.50
3.87
(
3
)
5.97
0.093
31.59
−0.37
7.49
97.49
4.15
(
4
)
9.07
0.135
31.04
−0.33
6.97
91.86
3.66
(
5
)
8.91
0.136
30.76
−0.30
7.07
78.85
3.75
(
6
)
4.76
0.056
31.07
−0.37
7.38
98.74
3.67
(
7
)
6.45
0.071
31.24
−0.34
6.96
123.80
3.86
(
8
)
6.74
0.108
30.17
−0.33
6.70
95.88
4.06
(
9
)
6.60
0.110
29.09
−0.31
6.05
98.74
3.96
(
10
)
6.74
0.122
31.16
−0.32
7.35
111.34
3.54
(
11
)
5.55
0.057
31.82
−0.32
7.55
125.34
3.66
(
12
)
6.6
0.111
29.44
−0.34
6.76
101.56
4.13
(
13
)
6.6
0.11
30.61
−0.38
6.47
100.64
4.18Table 4
ANOVA evaluation for each response variable and coefficient of prediction models.
Source
Y
1: moisture content
Y
2: water activity
Y
3: shear force
Y
4: L∗
Y
5: a∗
Y
6: b∗
Y
7: overall acceptance
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
Model
14.88
33.30
<0.0001
8.01
E
-
03
153.31
<0.0001
1533.74
3.60
0.062
5.57
3.89
0.053
5.88
E
-
03
3.47
0.064
2.24
7.17
0.011
0.33
2.02
0.193
x
1
12.84
86.21
<0.0001
5.49
E
-
03
524.68
<0.0001
584.65
6.87
0.034
0.31
1.08
0.334
4.00
E
-
04
0.71
0.422
0.38
6.06
0.043
0.02
0.53
0.488
x
2
1.19
8.01
0.020
2.05
E
-
03
196.28
<0.0001
337.23
3.96
0.087
0.06
0.22
0.657
4.90
E
-
05
1.03
0.336
0.07
1.13
0.323
9.56
E
-
04
0.03
0.969
x
1
x
2
0.85
5.68
0.041
6.40
E
-
05
6.12
0.043
114.28
1.34
0.285
4.22
E
-
03
0.02
0.907
6.40
E
-
05
8.67
0.016
0.03
0.41
0.543
0.04
1.10
0.329
x
1
2
2.31
E
-
04
21.34
0.002
188.34
2.21
0.180
2.61
9.10
0.02
2.31
E
-
04
21.34
0.002
1.02
16.40
0.005
0.17
5.31
0.055
x
2
2
2.43
E
-
04
23.26
0.001
244.77
2.88
0.134
3.26
11.38
0.012
2.43
E
-
04
23.26
0.001
0.97
15.60
0.006
0.14
4.20
0.080
Lack of fit
1.33
72.05
0.005
6.44
E
-
05
9.75
0.026
521.73
9.41
0.028
0.38
0.31
0.005
1.21
E
-
03
0.25
0.920
0.07
0.24
0.523
0.17
3.48
0.130
Pure error
0.02
8.80
E
-
06
73.92
1.63
3.88
E
-
03
0.37
0.06
R
2
0.92
0.99
0.8203
0.735
0.5363
0.8367
0.8905


### 3.2. Moisture Content

The final moisture content of the dried SLS was 4.76–9.07%. The minimum moisture content (4.76%) was found at a drying temperature of 74.14°C and drying time of 4 h, while the maximum moisture content (9.07%) was recorded at a drying temperature of 45.86°C and drying time of 4 h (Table3). The 3D plot (Figure 2) presents the effect of drying conditions (drying temperature and drying time) on moisture content. Based on the results of the response surface model, drying temperature and time significantly affected the moisture content in a linear manner. In addition, an interaction term for drying temperature and time was also observed. The following regression equation describes the effect of the process variables on the moisture content of SLS:(5)MoisturecontentY1=6.71-1.27X1-0.39X2+0.46X1X2.The negative coefficients of the first-order terms of drying temperature and time indicated that moisture content decreased when these variables were increased. Our results were in accordance with those of a previous study by Patil et al. [23], who reported that the moisture content of encapsulated pandan extract was decreased following first-order regression by increasing the inlet air temperature during spray-drying. In contrast, Nath and Chattopadhyay [20] observed a first-order regression and quadratic terms for drying temperature and time on the moisture content during oven roasting of potato-soy snack. The minor difference from our results may be related to the variety of the samples and time ranges used for drying. In our experiment, both the drying temperature and time for hot air-drying decreased the moisture content of SLS to a first-order regression.Figure 2
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on moisture content of SLS.


### 3.3. Water Activity

The amount of available water in a dried product may directly and positively influence microbiological stability. It has been reported that microorganisms grow best between water activity (aw) values 0.98–0.99, and most microbes cease growing at aw < 0.90. Some fungi stop growing at aw value as low as 0.62 [24]. Thus, water activity is the key parameter affecting microbiological spoilage. In our study, the aw of SLS ranged from 0.056 to 0.136 after drying, indicating that the SLS was in a stable state (Table 3). The lowest aw value was observed at the lowest moisture content, which may be because of the correlation between these parameters. Based on the results of the aw model and 3D plot, the drying temperature and drying time showed significant linear effects, as well as an interaction term effect for drying temperature and drying time on the aw (Figure 3). The regression equation describing the effect of drying temperature and time on the aw of SLS in terms of measured levels for the variables was as follows:(6)WateractivityY2=0.11-0.026X1-0.016X2-0.004X1X2.The linear and quadratic effects were negative, indicating that the water activity of SLS decreased with increasing drying temperatures and times (6). Our results were similar to those of a previous study by Šumić et al. [25] who reported that drying temperature and time significantly affected the water activity of red currants during vacuum-drying following a first-order effect model. In their study, quadratic effects were also observed but were not obvious. This may be explained by the different time ranges chosen for the drying process.Figure 3
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on water activity of SLS.


### 3.4. Color

Color is an important attribute of SLS and contributes to consumer preference. Generally, color is produced by chemical reactions such as the Maillard reaction, which occurs between free amino acids and reduced sugar. In our experiment, the color parameters of SLS includingL∗, a∗, and b∗ values were measured during the hot air-drying process. Low correlation coefficients were observed for L∗ and a∗ value (0.7350 and 0.5362, resp.) (Table 4). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the b∗ value, which fit well the experimental data. The model for the response value was expressed using the following quadratic polynomial equation:(7)b∗valueY6=6.44+0.22X1-0.094X2+0.08X1X2+0.38X12+0.37X22.Based on (7), positive quadratic effects for drying temperature and time were observed for the b∗ value. Additionally, a negative linear but insignificant effect of drying time was observed. The b∗ value of SLS ranged from 6.05 to 7.55 and minimum b∗ value (6.05) was observed at a drying temperature of 60°C and drying time of 4 h. The maximum b∗ value (7.55) was found at a drying temperature of 70°C and drying time of 5 h. Based on the results of the 3D plot (Figure 4), the b∗ value slightly decreased at temperatures 50–60°C, followed by a slight increase with increasing temperature. The b∗ value decreased possibly because the pigment in seaweed laver was destroyed at temperatures of 50–60°C, while a caramelization reaction occurred when the sample was dried at a high temperature, causing an increase in the b∗ value [26]. Similar results were reported by Rodriguez et al. [27] who found that the color parameter b∗ of laver decreased significantly after drying and the yellow color was changed to blue-violet.Figure 4
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time onb∗ value of SLS.


### 3.5. Shear Force

Shear force is an important parameter that markedly affects the quality of ready-to-eat snack products [28]. In our experiment, the shear force value of SLS ranged from 85.32 to 125.34 N. The minimum and maximum shear force values were observed at a drying temperature of 50°C and time of 5 h and drying temperature of 70°C and time of 5 h, respectively (Table 3). The analysis of variance results for the response surface model of shear force showed that the drying temperature and drying time had a significant linear effect on the shear force of SLS (p<0.05). A quadratic and interaction term for drying temperature and time affected the shear force, but not significantly (p>0.05). The quadratic polynomial equation for shear force is as follows:(8)ShearforceY3=100.86+8.55X1+6.49X2+5.34X1X2-5.20X12+5.93X22.The positive coefficients of the first-order terms of drying temperature and time indicated that the shear force increased as these variables increased. A negative quadratic effect for drying temperature was also observed. Based on (8) the drying temperature showed a greater effect than drying time on shear force because the response surface of shear force showed a greater change when drying temperature was varied. In addition, Figure 5 shows the shear force of SLS as a function of drying temperature and time. The shear force was significantly increased with increasing drying temperature and time. Similar results were observed in a previous study by Kumar et al. [29] who reported that the shear force of dried okra increased with increasing drying temperature. Nketsia-Tabiri and Sefa-Dedeh [30] also point out that the shear force of salted fish depended on the drying temperature and time. A positive linear and quadratic effect of drying time on the shear force of raw noodle was also reported by Khare et al. [31].Figure 5
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on shear force value of SLS.


### 3.6. Overall Acceptance

Overall acceptability values of SLS during drying with different combinations of drying temperature and time are presented in Table2. The maximum overall acceptability value was 4.18 at a drying temperature of 60°C and time of 4 h, while the minimum was 3.54 at a drying temperature of 60°C and time of 2.59 h, respectively (Table 3). Based on the results of ANOVA for overall acceptability, a significant quadratic model effect of drying temperature and time on the overall acceptability was observed (p<0.05), while the linear and interaction terms of drying parameters were not obvious. The 3D plot showing the effect of drying temperature and time on overall acceptability is shown in Figure 6. During the first 4.5 h drying process, the overall acceptability value increased but decreased as the drying process was continued, which may be explained by increase in shear force. In addition, the higher temperature hardened the SLS and created a casing on it. The final equation in terms of coded factors is shown as(9)OverallacceptabilityY7=4.04+0.047X1-0.011X2-0.095X1X2-0.16X12-0.14X22.The negative coefficients for drying temperature and time indicated that overall acceptability values increased up to a limit but decreased as the drying process continued. Nath and Chattopadhyay [20] reported a quadratic terms effect of temperature and time on the overall acceptability values of potato-soy snack, and large increases in these variables resulted in decreased overall acceptability values.Figure 6
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on overall acceptability value of SLS.


### 3.7. Synthetic Evaluation

In our study, although theL∗ and a∗ values showed low correlation coefficients in the model (<0.80), they affected the weight factors of other parameters and synthetic evaluation index value. To comprehensively investigate the efficiency of the quality of SLS, L∗ and a∗ values were also included in the synthetic evaluation index. Table 5 shows the membership value of each response variable and synthetic evaluation index (S). The S value for the response surface design ranged from 0.1960 to 0.7379; the minimum S value was recorded at a drying temperature of 45.86°C and drying time of 4 h, while the maximum value was found at a drying temperature of 74.14°C and drying time of 4 h.Table 5
Membership value of each response variable and synthetic evaluation index (S) for response surface design.
Runs
Moisture content
Water activity
Overall acceptability
Shear force
L
∗
a
∗
b
∗
S
(
1
)
0.5615
0.25
0.2031
1
0.7436
1
0.4933
0.4834
(
2
)
0.5661
0.3
0.5156
0.4458
0.4542
0
0.8867
0.4596
(
3
)
0.7193
0.5375
0.9062
0.6959
0.9158
0.7778
0.04
0.6877
(
4
)
0
0.0125
0.1875
0.8365
0.7143
0.3333
0.3867
0.1960
(
5
)
0.0371
0
0.3281
1.1617
0.6117
0
0.32
0.2400
(
6
)
1
1
0.2031
0.6647
0.7252
0.7778
0.1133
0.7379
(
7
)
0.6079
0.8125
0.5
0.0385
0.7875
0.4444
0.3933
0.5706
(
8
)
0.5406
0.35
0.8125
0.7361
0.3956
0.3333
0.5667
0.5506
(
9
)
0.5731
0.325
0.6563
0.6647
0
0.1111
1
0.5065
(
10
)
0.5406
0.175
0
0.3498
0.7582
0.2222
0.1333
0.2966
(
11
)
0.8167
0.9875
0.1875
0
1
0.2222
0
0.5905
(
12
)
0.5731
0.3125
0.9219
0.5942
0.1282
0.4444
0.5267
0.5488
(
13
)
0.5731
0.325
1
0.6172
0.5568
0.8889
0.72
0.6232ANOVA results for theS value are listed in Table 6. A good coefficient of determination (R2=0.8613) was obtained. Drying temperature and time showed significant linear effects on the S value. In addition, interaction effects for drying temperature and time were observed. The predicted model obtained for S value was as follows:(10)S=0.50+0.17X1+0.067X2-0.085X1X2.As shown by (10), the drying temperature had greater effects on the S value than the drying time because of the higher coefficient estimate values for drying temperature. The 3D plot shows that the S value increased with increasing drying temperature and time (Figure 7). Similar results were observed by Wang et al. [17], who found that the drying temperature had linear effects on the synthetic evaluation index ofokara during the drying process.Table 6
ANOVA evaluation for synthetic evaluation index (S) and coefficient of prediction model.
Source
SS
F-value
p value
Model
0.28
18.62
0.0003
x
1
0.22
43.09
0.0001
x
2
0.036
7.04
0.0263
x
1
x
2
0.029
5.74
0.0402
Lack of fit
0.031
1.69
0.3165
Pure error
0.015
R
2
0.8613Figure 7
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on synthetic evaluation index (S) of SLS.


### 3.8. Optimization of Hot Air-Drying Parameters

The numerical analysis and graphic optimization techniques of the Design-Expert software were used for the simultaneous optimization of the multiple responses. All of the independent variables were kept within range, while the described targets for each response are presented in Table7. Based on the desirability of the solution generated by the software, one optimal condition was obtained, which was a drying temperature of 70°C and drying time of 3 h with a predicted S value of 0.6830. The moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗ of SLS samples dried under the optimized conditions are presented in Table 7. According to (10) the actual value of S was 0.6877, which was close to the predicted value.Table 7
Simultaneously optimized hot air drying conditions with target and experimental values of investigated responses.
Responses
Target
Experiment values
Moisture content (%)
Minimized
5.79
Water activity
Minimized
0.09
L
∗
Maximized
31.59
a
∗
Minimized
−0.37
b
∗
Minimized
7.49
Shear force (N)
Minimized
97.49
Overall acceptability
Maximized
4.15
S
Maximized
0.69


## 3.1. Selection of Independent Variable Levels

In this study, the drying temperature (50–70°C) and drying time (3–5 h) were chosen for the hot air-drying process based on our preliminary trials. If the air temperature was too high and drying time was too long, hardening occurred and a casing formed. This may be because moisture was removed from the surface of foods being dried more rapidly than water could diffuse from the moist interior of the food particle [21]. A low drying temperature and short drying time could not effectively remove the moisture to reach the level of moisture needed for an SLS.The results of response variables, including moisture content, water activity, color (L∗, a∗, b∗), shear force, and overall acceptance under different drying conditions are reported in Table 3. The minimum R2 was 0.8, which indicated that the data fit the statistical model [22]. As shown in Table 4, a high correlation coefficient explained the goodness of fit of the experimental data for the response surface models of moisture content, water activity, b value, shear force, and overall acceptability. The 3D surface graphs for these responses were developed as a function of the two independent variables according to the significance of the responses. Multiple responses were optimized using a synthetic evaluation method [17].Table 3
Experimental values of response variables for response surface design.
Runs
Water content (%)
Water activity
L
∗
a
∗
b
∗
Shear force
Overall acceptability
(
1
)
6.65
0.116
31.12
−0.39
6.81
85.32
3.67
(
2
)
6.63
0.112
30.33
−0.3
6.22
107.50
3.87
(
3
)
5.97
0.093
31.59
−0.37
7.49
97.49
4.15
(
4
)
9.07
0.135
31.04
−0.33
6.97
91.86
3.66
(
5
)
8.91
0.136
30.76
−0.30
7.07
78.85
3.75
(
6
)
4.76
0.056
31.07
−0.37
7.38
98.74
3.67
(
7
)
6.45
0.071
31.24
−0.34
6.96
123.80
3.86
(
8
)
6.74
0.108
30.17
−0.33
6.70
95.88
4.06
(
9
)
6.60
0.110
29.09
−0.31
6.05
98.74
3.96
(
10
)
6.74
0.122
31.16
−0.32
7.35
111.34
3.54
(
11
)
5.55
0.057
31.82
−0.32
7.55
125.34
3.66
(
12
)
6.6
0.111
29.44
−0.34
6.76
101.56
4.13
(
13
)
6.6
0.11
30.61
−0.38
6.47
100.64
4.18Table 4
ANOVA evaluation for each response variable and coefficient of prediction models.
Source
Y
1: moisture content
Y
2: water activity
Y
3: shear force
Y
4: L∗
Y
5: a∗
Y
6: b∗
Y
7: overall acceptance
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
SS
F-value
p value
Model
14.88
33.30
<0.0001
8.01
E
-
03
153.31
<0.0001
1533.74
3.60
0.062
5.57
3.89
0.053
5.88
E
-
03
3.47
0.064
2.24
7.17
0.011
0.33
2.02
0.193
x
1
12.84
86.21
<0.0001
5.49
E
-
03
524.68
<0.0001
584.65
6.87
0.034
0.31
1.08
0.334
4.00
E
-
04
0.71
0.422
0.38
6.06
0.043
0.02
0.53
0.488
x
2
1.19
8.01
0.020
2.05
E
-
03
196.28
<0.0001
337.23
3.96
0.087
0.06
0.22
0.657
4.90
E
-
05
1.03
0.336
0.07
1.13
0.323
9.56
E
-
04
0.03
0.969
x
1
x
2
0.85
5.68
0.041
6.40
E
-
05
6.12
0.043
114.28
1.34
0.285
4.22
E
-
03
0.02
0.907
6.40
E
-
05
8.67
0.016
0.03
0.41
0.543
0.04
1.10
0.329
x
1
2
2.31
E
-
04
21.34
0.002
188.34
2.21
0.180
2.61
9.10
0.02
2.31
E
-
04
21.34
0.002
1.02
16.40
0.005
0.17
5.31
0.055
x
2
2
2.43
E
-
04
23.26
0.001
244.77
2.88
0.134
3.26
11.38
0.012
2.43
E
-
04
23.26
0.001
0.97
15.60
0.006
0.14
4.20
0.080
Lack of fit
1.33
72.05
0.005
6.44
E
-
05
9.75
0.026
521.73
9.41
0.028
0.38
0.31
0.005
1.21
E
-
03
0.25
0.920
0.07
0.24
0.523
0.17
3.48
0.130
Pure error
0.02
8.80
E
-
06
73.92
1.63
3.88
E
-
03
0.37
0.06
R
2
0.92
0.99
0.8203
0.735
0.5363
0.8367
0.8905


## 3.2. Moisture Content

The final moisture content of the dried SLS was 4.76–9.07%. The minimum moisture content (4.76%) was found at a drying temperature of 74.14°C and drying time of 4 h, while the maximum moisture content (9.07%) was recorded at a drying temperature of 45.86°C and drying time of 4 h (Table3). The 3D plot (Figure 2) presents the effect of drying conditions (drying temperature and drying time) on moisture content. Based on the results of the response surface model, drying temperature and time significantly affected the moisture content in a linear manner. In addition, an interaction term for drying temperature and time was also observed. The following regression equation describes the effect of the process variables on the moisture content of SLS:(5)MoisturecontentY1=6.71-1.27X1-0.39X2+0.46X1X2.The negative coefficients of the first-order terms of drying temperature and time indicated that moisture content decreased when these variables were increased. Our results were in accordance with those of a previous study by Patil et al. [23], who reported that the moisture content of encapsulated pandan extract was decreased following first-order regression by increasing the inlet air temperature during spray-drying. In contrast, Nath and Chattopadhyay [20] observed a first-order regression and quadratic terms for drying temperature and time on the moisture content during oven roasting of potato-soy snack. The minor difference from our results may be related to the variety of the samples and time ranges used for drying. In our experiment, both the drying temperature and time for hot air-drying decreased the moisture content of SLS to a first-order regression.Figure 2
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on moisture content of SLS.


## 3.3. Water Activity

The amount of available water in a dried product may directly and positively influence microbiological stability. It has been reported that microorganisms grow best between water activity (aw) values 0.98–0.99, and most microbes cease growing at aw < 0.90. Some fungi stop growing at aw value as low as 0.62 [24]. Thus, water activity is the key parameter affecting microbiological spoilage. In our study, the aw of SLS ranged from 0.056 to 0.136 after drying, indicating that the SLS was in a stable state (Table 3). The lowest aw value was observed at the lowest moisture content, which may be because of the correlation between these parameters. Based on the results of the aw model and 3D plot, the drying temperature and drying time showed significant linear effects, as well as an interaction term effect for drying temperature and drying time on the aw (Figure 3). The regression equation describing the effect of drying temperature and time on the aw of SLS in terms of measured levels for the variables was as follows:(6)WateractivityY2=0.11-0.026X1-0.016X2-0.004X1X2.The linear and quadratic effects were negative, indicating that the water activity of SLS decreased with increasing drying temperatures and times (6). Our results were similar to those of a previous study by Šumić et al. [25] who reported that drying temperature and time significantly affected the water activity of red currants during vacuum-drying following a first-order effect model. In their study, quadratic effects were also observed but were not obvious. This may be explained by the different time ranges chosen for the drying process.Figure 3
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on water activity of SLS.


## 3.4. Color

Color is an important attribute of SLS and contributes to consumer preference. Generally, color is produced by chemical reactions such as the Maillard reaction, which occurs between free amino acids and reduced sugar. In our experiment, the color parameters of SLS includingL∗, a∗, and b∗ values were measured during the hot air-drying process. Low correlation coefficients were observed for L∗ and a∗ value (0.7350 and 0.5362, resp.) (Table 4). Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the b∗ value, which fit well the experimental data. The model for the response value was expressed using the following quadratic polynomial equation:(7)b∗valueY6=6.44+0.22X1-0.094X2+0.08X1X2+0.38X12+0.37X22.Based on (7), positive quadratic effects for drying temperature and time were observed for the b∗ value. Additionally, a negative linear but insignificant effect of drying time was observed. The b∗ value of SLS ranged from 6.05 to 7.55 and minimum b∗ value (6.05) was observed at a drying temperature of 60°C and drying time of 4 h. The maximum b∗ value (7.55) was found at a drying temperature of 70°C and drying time of 5 h. Based on the results of the 3D plot (Figure 4), the b∗ value slightly decreased at temperatures 50–60°C, followed by a slight increase with increasing temperature. The b∗ value decreased possibly because the pigment in seaweed laver was destroyed at temperatures of 50–60°C, while a caramelization reaction occurred when the sample was dried at a high temperature, causing an increase in the b∗ value [26]. Similar results were reported by Rodriguez et al. [27] who found that the color parameter b∗ of laver decreased significantly after drying and the yellow color was changed to blue-violet.Figure 4
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time onb∗ value of SLS.


## 3.5. Shear Force

Shear force is an important parameter that markedly affects the quality of ready-to-eat snack products [28]. In our experiment, the shear force value of SLS ranged from 85.32 to 125.34 N. The minimum and maximum shear force values were observed at a drying temperature of 50°C and time of 5 h and drying temperature of 70°C and time of 5 h, respectively (Table 3). The analysis of variance results for the response surface model of shear force showed that the drying temperature and drying time had a significant linear effect on the shear force of SLS (p<0.05). A quadratic and interaction term for drying temperature and time affected the shear force, but not significantly (p>0.05). The quadratic polynomial equation for shear force is as follows:(8)ShearforceY3=100.86+8.55X1+6.49X2+5.34X1X2-5.20X12+5.93X22.The positive coefficients of the first-order terms of drying temperature and time indicated that the shear force increased as these variables increased. A negative quadratic effect for drying temperature was also observed. Based on (8) the drying temperature showed a greater effect than drying time on shear force because the response surface of shear force showed a greater change when drying temperature was varied. In addition, Figure 5 shows the shear force of SLS as a function of drying temperature and time. The shear force was significantly increased with increasing drying temperature and time. Similar results were observed in a previous study by Kumar et al. [29] who reported that the shear force of dried okra increased with increasing drying temperature. Nketsia-Tabiri and Sefa-Dedeh [30] also point out that the shear force of salted fish depended on the drying temperature and time. A positive linear and quadratic effect of drying time on the shear force of raw noodle was also reported by Khare et al. [31].Figure 5
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on shear force value of SLS.


## 3.6. Overall Acceptance

Overall acceptability values of SLS during drying with different combinations of drying temperature and time are presented in Table2. The maximum overall acceptability value was 4.18 at a drying temperature of 60°C and time of 4 h, while the minimum was 3.54 at a drying temperature of 60°C and time of 2.59 h, respectively (Table 3). Based on the results of ANOVA for overall acceptability, a significant quadratic model effect of drying temperature and time on the overall acceptability was observed (p<0.05), while the linear and interaction terms of drying parameters were not obvious. The 3D plot showing the effect of drying temperature and time on overall acceptability is shown in Figure 6. During the first 4.5 h drying process, the overall acceptability value increased but decreased as the drying process was continued, which may be explained by increase in shear force. In addition, the higher temperature hardened the SLS and created a casing on it. The final equation in terms of coded factors is shown as(9)OverallacceptabilityY7=4.04+0.047X1-0.011X2-0.095X1X2-0.16X12-0.14X22.The negative coefficients for drying temperature and time indicated that overall acceptability values increased up to a limit but decreased as the drying process continued. Nath and Chattopadhyay [20] reported a quadratic terms effect of temperature and time on the overall acceptability values of potato-soy snack, and large increases in these variables resulted in decreased overall acceptability values.Figure 6
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on overall acceptability value of SLS.


## 3.7. Synthetic Evaluation

In our study, although theL∗ and a∗ values showed low correlation coefficients in the model (<0.80), they affected the weight factors of other parameters and synthetic evaluation index value. To comprehensively investigate the efficiency of the quality of SLS, L∗ and a∗ values were also included in the synthetic evaluation index. Table 5 shows the membership value of each response variable and synthetic evaluation index (S). The S value for the response surface design ranged from 0.1960 to 0.7379; the minimum S value was recorded at a drying temperature of 45.86°C and drying time of 4 h, while the maximum value was found at a drying temperature of 74.14°C and drying time of 4 h.Table 5
Membership value of each response variable and synthetic evaluation index (S) for response surface design.
Runs
Moisture content
Water activity
Overall acceptability
Shear force
L
∗
a
∗
b
∗
S
(
1
)
0.5615
0.25
0.2031
1
0.7436
1
0.4933
0.4834
(
2
)
0.5661
0.3
0.5156
0.4458
0.4542
0
0.8867
0.4596
(
3
)
0.7193
0.5375
0.9062
0.6959
0.9158
0.7778
0.04
0.6877
(
4
)
0
0.0125
0.1875
0.8365
0.7143
0.3333
0.3867
0.1960
(
5
)
0.0371
0
0.3281
1.1617
0.6117
0
0.32
0.2400
(
6
)
1
1
0.2031
0.6647
0.7252
0.7778
0.1133
0.7379
(
7
)
0.6079
0.8125
0.5
0.0385
0.7875
0.4444
0.3933
0.5706
(
8
)
0.5406
0.35
0.8125
0.7361
0.3956
0.3333
0.5667
0.5506
(
9
)
0.5731
0.325
0.6563
0.6647
0
0.1111
1
0.5065
(
10
)
0.5406
0.175
0
0.3498
0.7582
0.2222
0.1333
0.2966
(
11
)
0.8167
0.9875
0.1875
0
1
0.2222
0
0.5905
(
12
)
0.5731
0.3125
0.9219
0.5942
0.1282
0.4444
0.5267
0.5488
(
13
)
0.5731
0.325
1
0.6172
0.5568
0.8889
0.72
0.6232ANOVA results for theS value are listed in Table 6. A good coefficient of determination (R2=0.8613) was obtained. Drying temperature and time showed significant linear effects on the S value. In addition, interaction effects for drying temperature and time were observed. The predicted model obtained for S value was as follows:(10)S=0.50+0.17X1+0.067X2-0.085X1X2.As shown by (10), the drying temperature had greater effects on the S value than the drying time because of the higher coefficient estimate values for drying temperature. The 3D plot shows that the S value increased with increasing drying temperature and time (Figure 7). Similar results were observed by Wang et al. [17], who found that the drying temperature had linear effects on the synthetic evaluation index ofokara during the drying process.Table 6
ANOVA evaluation for synthetic evaluation index (S) and coefficient of prediction model.
Source
SS
F-value
p value
Model
0.28
18.62
0.0003
x
1
0.22
43.09
0.0001
x
2
0.036
7.04
0.0263
x
1
x
2
0.029
5.74
0.0402
Lack of fit
0.031
1.69
0.3165
Pure error
0.015
R
2
0.8613Figure 7
3D response surface and contour plots for the effect of drying temperature and time on synthetic evaluation index (S) of SLS.


## 3.8. Optimization of Hot Air-Drying Parameters

The numerical analysis and graphic optimization techniques of the Design-Expert software were used for the simultaneous optimization of the multiple responses. All of the independent variables were kept within range, while the described targets for each response are presented in Table7. Based on the desirability of the solution generated by the software, one optimal condition was obtained, which was a drying temperature of 70°C and drying time of 3 h with a predicted S value of 0.6830. The moisture content, water activity, overall acceptability, shear force, L∗, a∗, and b∗ of SLS samples dried under the optimized conditions are presented in Table 7. According to (10) the actual value of S was 0.6877, which was close to the predicted value.Table 7
Simultaneously optimized hot air drying conditions with target and experimental values of investigated responses.
Responses
Target
Experiment values
Moisture content (%)
Minimized
5.79
Water activity
Minimized
0.09
L
∗
Maximized
31.59
a
∗
Minimized
−0.37
b
∗
Minimized
7.49
Shear force (N)
Minimized
97.49
Overall acceptability
Maximized
4.15
S
Maximized
0.69


## 4. Conclusion

An SLS prepared with dried squid, laver, and almond was developed using a hot air-drying process. Drying temperature and drying time significantly affected the response values including moisture content, water activity, color, shear force, and overall acceptability. The drying temperature had a stronger effect than the drying time on synthetic evaluation. The optimum conditions for hot air-drying of SLS were identified as 70°C for 3 h.



---

*Source: 9761356-2017-12-19.xml*