# Emergence of New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase (NDM) andKlebsiella pneumoniaeCarbapenemase (KPC) Production byEscherichia coliandKlebsiella pneumoniaein Southern Vietnam and Appropriate Methods of Detection: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors: Cuong Q. Hoang; Hai D. Nguyen; Huy Q. Vu; Anh T. Nguyen; Binh T. Pham; Trung L. Tran; Hanh T. H. Nguyen; Y. M. Dao; Tuyet S. M. Nguyen; Dung A. Nguyen; Hang T. T. Tran; Lan T. Phan
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are well known to cause many serious infections resulting in increasing mortality rate, treatment cost, and prolonged hospitalization. Among the widely recognized types of carbapenemases, New Delhiβ-lactamase (NDM) andKlebsiella pneumoniaecarbapenemase (KPC) are the most important enzymes. However, in Vietnam, there are only scattered reports of CPE due to the lack of simple and affordable methods that are suitable to laboratory conditions. This study aims to survey the characteristics of carbapenem-resistantE. coli andK. pneumoniae (CR-E/K) at two hospitals in Southern Vietnam and perform some simple methods to detect the two enzymes.A total of 100 CR-E/K strains were collected from clinical isolates of Gia Dinh People’s Hospital and Dong Nai General Hospital, Vietnam, from November 2017 to May 2018. The patient-related information was also included in the analysis. We conducted real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Modified Hodge Test (MHT), and combined disk test (CDT) on all isolates. Carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected in 47 isolates (36 NDM, 10 KPC, and one isolate harboring both genes). TheE. colistrain carrying simultaneously these two genes was the first case reported here. Most of isolates were collected from patients in ICU, Infectious Disease Department, and Department of Urologic Surgery. Urine and sputum were two common specimens. The true positive rate (sensitivity, TPR) and specificity (SPC) of the imipenem–EDTA (ethylen diamine tetra acetic acid) for NDM detection and the imipenem–PBA (phenylboronic acid) for KPC detection onE. coliwere 93.8%, 97.1% and 66.7%, 95.7%, respectively. Meanwhile, the imipenem–EDTA for NDM detection and the imipenem–PBA for KPC detection amongK. pneumonia achieved 90.5%, 100% and 100%, 92.9% TPR and SPC, respectively. However, MHT showed low sensitivity and specificity. Our findings showed that CP-E/K were detected with high prevalence in the two hospitals. We suggest that CDT can be used as a low-priced and accurate method of detection.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Antibiotic resistance is a tremendous health problem. This includes the resistance to carbapenems which was considered as the last resort for Enterobacteriaceae infections [1]. In 2017, the World Health Organization published a list of superbugs including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Carbapenemase production and ESBL/AmpC β-lactamase production coupled with porin loss or efflux pump were the common ways that Enterobacteriaceae become resistant to carbapenems [2]. However, the carbapenemase production was more dangerous than the others [2].E. coliandK. pneumoniaeare the most common pathogens in Enterobacteriaceae family. These carbapenemasae-producing bacteria were found in many countries, such as China [3], Parkistan [4], India [5], Turkey [6], Brazil [7], Mexico [8], Peru [9], and Greece [10]. Through this mechanism, New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-1 (NDM-1) was found in Asia with the highest frequency;Klebsiella pneumoniaecarbapenemase (KPC) was the most popular enzyme causing carbapenem resistance, especially KPC-2 [1, 11, 12]. Furthermore, KPC-producing bacteria have spread all over the world, including Asia [11]. Some gray literature also reported about KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Vietnam [13–15]. In other important views, these two genes harboring bacteria were more dangerous and resistant to carbapenem with a higher level than bacteria that harbored other types of carbapenemase-encoding genes (including OXA-48-like, another popular carbapenemase present in Enterobacteriaceae) [6, 16–18]. For instance, these carbapenemase-producing bacteria result in severe infections with high mortality rate; the infection caused by KPC-producingK. pnuemoniaewas from 40% to 56% [16] and up to 88% for NDM-1 producing Enterobacteriaceae [6].Carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for these two types of carbapeenemase producers in recent studies were higher than carbapenem MIC values against OXA-48 type producers [17, 18].In another aspect, these bacteria have spread rapidly through mobilisable genetic elements [19, 20], for example, plasmid IncX3 [21], IncA/C2 [22]; transposon Tn4401[23], Tn125 [21], or class I Integron [24]. These elements also play important roles in the existence of multiple genes and transporting various multidrug-resistant genes between bacterial species.In Vietnam, the prevalence of these CPE is increasingly being reported in the hospital and aquatic environment [25–27]. Data about carbapenemase-producingE. coliandK. pneumoniae were reported notably in Southern and Northern Vietnam. Due to the lack of needed methods for screening and detection, there is an underestimation of CPE in other regions of Vietnam. The requirement for low-priced and efficient methods to screen or confirm carbapenemase-producing bacteria in laboratories, which are likely to be suitable for low-resource settings in Vietnam, is urgent. Today, the combinations of meropenem and varbobactam or imipenem and relebactam are taken into consideration as an option to treat infections caused by KPC-producing organisms [28, 29]. Therefore, it is vital to select an efficient method to detect and characterize these carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae,particularly in Vietnam.Among various methods, PCR, real-time PCR, and DNA sequencing are the gold standards for carbapenemase-encoding genes detection, but these methods have not been widely used in Vietnam due to the high cost. Phenotypic tests such as Modified Hodge Test and the combined disk test are suitable because of the lower cost. The combined disk test is based on the synergy between metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) or KPC inhibitors (EDTA or PBA) and carbapenems. Many studies used these methods but none of them investigatedE. coliandK. pneumoniaeseparately [30, 31]. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of NDM/KPC-producingE. coli/K. pneumoniae at the hospitals in the South Vietnam and to assess some simple methods for detecting these bacteria in laboratory conditions.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Study Design and Sample Collection

The study was designed as a cross-sectional study, including all clinical isolates from November 2017 to May 2018. The study was conducted at the Molecular Biomedicine Laboratory in the Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City. 100 clinical isolate strains (50E. coliand 50K. pneumoniae) were collected from the Microbiology Department of Gia Dinh People’s Hospital and Dong Nai General Hospital. All of them were nonsusceptible to one of the carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem) detected by the automatic systems. Patient data such as age, sex, specimen types, and clinical wards were gathered to survey the characteristics of patients. Sample list and relevant information are supplied in Annex 1.


### 2.2. Bacterial Isolates

Fifty-nine isolates from Gia Dinh People’s Hospital were identified and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux Vitek Inc., Hazelwood, MO, USA). Furthermore, ID/AST of 41 isolates from Dong Nai General Hospital was performed by using BD Phoenix™ (USA). From those hospitals, a single colony obtained from pure culture was inoculated into BHI (Heart Infusion Broth, Himedia, India) broth, with 20% glycerol (Xilong medical, China), and stored at -20°C, to reculture for extracting DNA for real-time PCR and performing phenotypic methods.


### 2.3. Real-Time PCR

#### 2.3.1. DNA Extraction

Bacterial DNA was extracted by heat treatment. One colony form pure isolates incubated overnight on MacConkey agar (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was suspended in 200μL of Tris-EDTA pH 8.0. The suspension was heated at 95°C for 20 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 revolutions per minute for 10 minutes to collect 150μL supernatant, and stored at -20°C for real-time PCR. DNA quality was evaluated using NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThemoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) with the acceptable range for the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm/280 nm from 1.6 to 1.8.


#### 2.3.2. Genotypic Detection of blaNDM, blaKPC, and 16S rRNA

The genes were detected by real-time PCR using TaqMan probes for all samples and were confirmed by DNA sequencing of selected positive samples. The bacterial DNA was performed to screen for the presence ofblaNDM andblaKPC. The reaction used bacterial 16S rRNA gene as an internal control for DNA extraction and amplification process. The primers and probes used forblaNDM,blaKPC, and 16S rRNA were described by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention [32]. To carry out real-time PCR, 5μL DNA was added to a final volume of 20μL Master Mix, which included 1X PCR buffer, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 5 IU Taq DNA polymerase (Solgent Co., Ltd., South Korea). The concentration for each primers and probes is illustrated in Table 1. The negative control for PCR reaction is sterile DEPC-treated water. DNA from GD018, which is a clinical isolate that carries bothblaNDM andblaKPC (confirmed by DNA sequencing), is used as a positive control.Table 1
Primers and probes used in this study.
Oligonucleotide Nucleotide sequence, 5′–3′ Origin Volume of reaction (nM) Reference  Primers and probes for real-time PCR  NDM-F Primer GAC CGC CCA GAT CCT CAA IDT 300 NDM-R Primer CGC GAC CGG CAG GTT IDT 300 NDM-probe HEX-TG GAT CAA GCA GGA GAT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 KPC-F Primer GGC CGC CGT GCA ATA C IDT 500 KPC-R Primer GCC GCC CAA CTC CTT CA IDT 500 [32] KPC- probe 6FAM-TG ATA ACG CCG CCG CCA ATT TGT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 16S rRNA-F Primer TGG AGC ATG TGG TTT AAT TCG A IDT 200 16S rRNA-R Primer TGC GGG ACT TAA CCC AAC A IDT 200 16S rRNA-probe Cy5-CA CGA GCT GAC GAC AR∗C CAT GCA-IBRQ IDT 100  Primers for DNA sequencing  NDM-F-seq AGT CGC TTC CAA CGG TTT IDT 300 This study NDM-R-seq CAT TGG CAT AAG TCG CAA TCC IDT 300 KPC-F-seq GGT CAC CCA TCT CGG AAA IDT 500 KPC-R-seq GGG ATG GCG GAG TTC AG IDT 500The real-time PCR conditions were chosen as follows: Enzyme activation was achieved by primary heating step at 95°C for 15 minutes. This was followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 56°C for 20 seconds. Real-time PCR was run on CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). Fluorescence signal was detected after each cycle. Positive sample was determined when the automatically normalized fluorescence signal rises above the threshold limit value calculated in each run. A total of 40 cycles takes 70 minutes.


#### 2.3.3. DNA Sequencing

DNA extracts from selected positive samples forblaNDM (GD013, GD002, and GD018) andblaKPC (GD011, GD16, and GD018) were sequenced using the sequencing primers. Initial PCR proceeded in the above-mentioned conditions, and PCR products were sent to 1-BASE (Singapore) for Sanger’s sequencing. 16S rRNA genes from two samples GD013 and GD018 were also sequenced to confirm the validity of the internal control primers.


### 2.4. Modified Hodge Test (MHT)

The MHT was carried out on all isolates, following the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guide on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA–Becton Diskinson, US) using 10μg meropenem (MEM) disks (Nam Khoa Biotech, Vietnam) [33].Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1705 andKlebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1706 were used as a positive control and a negative control, respectively.


### 2.5. Combined Disk Test (PBA/IPM–EDTA/IPM)

Phenylboronic acid solution was prepared by dissolving 2g phenylboronic acid (PBA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in 100mL solution containing 50mL distilled water and 50mL Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Xilong medical, China). EDTA 0.25M solution prepared by mixing 18.61g disodium ETDA.2H2O in 200 mL of distilled water was adjusted to pH 8.0 by using NaOH. Both solutions were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes. Either 20μL phenylboronic acid solution (400μg PBA) or 10μL EDTA solution (930μg EDTA) was added on a 10μg imipenem disk (IPM) to get a PBA/IPM or EDTA/IPM disk, respectively. These disks were used within 1 hour.A bacterial suspension with McFarland Equivalence Turbidity Standard 0.5 was streaked on MHA plate using a swab. Three disks, IPM, EDTA/IPM, and PBA/IPM, were placed on the MHA plate with the distance from one disk to another being at least 24 mm.Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1705 andKlebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1706 were used as a positive control and a negative control, respectively. An increase of 7 mm for EDTA/IPM or 5 mm for PBA/IPM in the diameter of the zone of inhibition compared to that of IPM was considered as a positive result for NDM or KPC production, respectively.


### 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were entered using Excel 2010, and all statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp. 2013). We determined characteristics of patients carrying carbapenemase-producing bacteria with 95% confidence interval (CI); odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables. Independent sample t-test was used for comparing the mean ages of the two groups.Real-time PCR was considered as a gold standard method. Sensitivity and specificity, negative predictive values (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) were also calculated. These values of MHT and CDT were compared using the nonparametric McNemar’s test.P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistical significance.


## 2.1. Study Design and Sample Collection

The study was designed as a cross-sectional study, including all clinical isolates from November 2017 to May 2018. The study was conducted at the Molecular Biomedicine Laboratory in the Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City. 100 clinical isolate strains (50E. coliand 50K. pneumoniae) were collected from the Microbiology Department of Gia Dinh People’s Hospital and Dong Nai General Hospital. All of them were nonsusceptible to one of the carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, or ertapenem) detected by the automatic systems. Patient data such as age, sex, specimen types, and clinical wards were gathered to survey the characteristics of patients. Sample list and relevant information are supplied in Annex 1.


## 2.2. Bacterial Isolates

Fifty-nine isolates from Gia Dinh People’s Hospital were identified and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing by using the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux Vitek Inc., Hazelwood, MO, USA). Furthermore, ID/AST of 41 isolates from Dong Nai General Hospital was performed by using BD Phoenix™ (USA). From those hospitals, a single colony obtained from pure culture was inoculated into BHI (Heart Infusion Broth, Himedia, India) broth, with 20% glycerol (Xilong medical, China), and stored at -20°C, to reculture for extracting DNA for real-time PCR and performing phenotypic methods.


## 2.3. Real-Time PCR

### 2.3.1. DNA Extraction

Bacterial DNA was extracted by heat treatment. One colony form pure isolates incubated overnight on MacConkey agar (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was suspended in 200μL of Tris-EDTA pH 8.0. The suspension was heated at 95°C for 20 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 revolutions per minute for 10 minutes to collect 150μL supernatant, and stored at -20°C for real-time PCR. DNA quality was evaluated using NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThemoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) with the acceptable range for the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm/280 nm from 1.6 to 1.8.


### 2.3.2. Genotypic Detection of blaNDM, blaKPC, and 16S rRNA

The genes were detected by real-time PCR using TaqMan probes for all samples and were confirmed by DNA sequencing of selected positive samples. The bacterial DNA was performed to screen for the presence ofblaNDM andblaKPC. The reaction used bacterial 16S rRNA gene as an internal control for DNA extraction and amplification process. The primers and probes used forblaNDM,blaKPC, and 16S rRNA were described by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention [32]. To carry out real-time PCR, 5μL DNA was added to a final volume of 20μL Master Mix, which included 1X PCR buffer, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 5 IU Taq DNA polymerase (Solgent Co., Ltd., South Korea). The concentration for each primers and probes is illustrated in Table 1. The negative control for PCR reaction is sterile DEPC-treated water. DNA from GD018, which is a clinical isolate that carries bothblaNDM andblaKPC (confirmed by DNA sequencing), is used as a positive control.Table 1
Primers and probes used in this study.
Oligonucleotide Nucleotide sequence, 5′–3′ Origin Volume of reaction (nM) Reference  Primers and probes for real-time PCR  NDM-F Primer GAC CGC CCA GAT CCT CAA IDT 300 NDM-R Primer CGC GAC CGG CAG GTT IDT 300 NDM-probe HEX-TG GAT CAA GCA GGA GAT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 KPC-F Primer GGC CGC CGT GCA ATA C IDT 500 KPC-R Primer GCC GCC CAA CTC CTT CA IDT 500 [32] KPC- probe 6FAM-TG ATA ACG CCG CCG CCA ATT TGT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 16S rRNA-F Primer TGG AGC ATG TGG TTT AAT TCG A IDT 200 16S rRNA-R Primer TGC GGG ACT TAA CCC AAC A IDT 200 16S rRNA-probe Cy5-CA CGA GCT GAC GAC AR∗C CAT GCA-IBRQ IDT 100  Primers for DNA sequencing  NDM-F-seq AGT CGC TTC CAA CGG TTT IDT 300 This study NDM-R-seq CAT TGG CAT AAG TCG CAA TCC IDT 300 KPC-F-seq GGT CAC CCA TCT CGG AAA IDT 500 KPC-R-seq GGG ATG GCG GAG TTC AG IDT 500The real-time PCR conditions were chosen as follows: Enzyme activation was achieved by primary heating step at 95°C for 15 minutes. This was followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 56°C for 20 seconds. Real-time PCR was run on CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). Fluorescence signal was detected after each cycle. Positive sample was determined when the automatically normalized fluorescence signal rises above the threshold limit value calculated in each run. A total of 40 cycles takes 70 minutes.


### 2.3.3. DNA Sequencing

DNA extracts from selected positive samples forblaNDM (GD013, GD002, and GD018) andblaKPC (GD011, GD16, and GD018) were sequenced using the sequencing primers. Initial PCR proceeded in the above-mentioned conditions, and PCR products were sent to 1-BASE (Singapore) for Sanger’s sequencing. 16S rRNA genes from two samples GD013 and GD018 were also sequenced to confirm the validity of the internal control primers.


## 2.3.1. DNA Extraction

Bacterial DNA was extracted by heat treatment. One colony form pure isolates incubated overnight on MacConkey agar (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was suspended in 200μL of Tris-EDTA pH 8.0. The suspension was heated at 95°C for 20 minutes, followed by centrifugation at 13,000 revolutions per minute for 10 minutes to collect 150μL supernatant, and stored at -20°C for real-time PCR. DNA quality was evaluated using NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (ThemoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) with the acceptable range for the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm/280 nm from 1.6 to 1.8.


## 2.3.2. Genotypic Detection of blaNDM, blaKPC, and 16S rRNA

The genes were detected by real-time PCR using TaqMan probes for all samples and were confirmed by DNA sequencing of selected positive samples. The bacterial DNA was performed to screen for the presence ofblaNDM andblaKPC. The reaction used bacterial 16S rRNA gene as an internal control for DNA extraction and amplification process. The primers and probes used forblaNDM,blaKPC, and 16S rRNA were described by the Center of Disease Control and Prevention [32]. To carry out real-time PCR, 5μL DNA was added to a final volume of 20μL Master Mix, which included 1X PCR buffer, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 5 IU Taq DNA polymerase (Solgent Co., Ltd., South Korea). The concentration for each primers and probes is illustrated in Table 1. The negative control for PCR reaction is sterile DEPC-treated water. DNA from GD018, which is a clinical isolate that carries bothblaNDM andblaKPC (confirmed by DNA sequencing), is used as a positive control.Table 1
Primers and probes used in this study.
Oligonucleotide Nucleotide sequence, 5′–3′ Origin Volume of reaction (nM) Reference  Primers and probes for real-time PCR  NDM-F Primer GAC CGC CCA GAT CCT CAA IDT 300 NDM-R Primer CGC GAC CGG CAG GTT IDT 300 NDM-probe HEX-TG GAT CAA GCA GGA GAT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 KPC-F Primer GGC CGC CGT GCA ATA C IDT 500 KPC-R Primer GCC GCC CAA CTC CTT CA IDT 500 [32] KPC- probe 6FAM-TG ATA ACG CCG CCG CCA ATT TGT-ZEN/IBFQ IDT 200 16S rRNA-F Primer TGG AGC ATG TGG TTT AAT TCG A IDT 200 16S rRNA-R Primer TGC GGG ACT TAA CCC AAC A IDT 200 16S rRNA-probe Cy5-CA CGA GCT GAC GAC AR∗C CAT GCA-IBRQ IDT 100  Primers for DNA sequencing  NDM-F-seq AGT CGC TTC CAA CGG TTT IDT 300 This study NDM-R-seq CAT TGG CAT AAG TCG CAA TCC IDT 300 KPC-F-seq GGT CAC CCA TCT CGG AAA IDT 500 KPC-R-seq GGG ATG GCG GAG TTC AG IDT 500The real-time PCR conditions were chosen as follows: Enzyme activation was achieved by primary heating step at 95°C for 15 minutes. This was followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 56°C for 20 seconds. Real-time PCR was run on CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA). Fluorescence signal was detected after each cycle. Positive sample was determined when the automatically normalized fluorescence signal rises above the threshold limit value calculated in each run. A total of 40 cycles takes 70 minutes.


## 2.3.3. DNA Sequencing

DNA extracts from selected positive samples forblaNDM (GD013, GD002, and GD018) andblaKPC (GD011, GD16, and GD018) were sequenced using the sequencing primers. Initial PCR proceeded in the above-mentioned conditions, and PCR products were sent to 1-BASE (Singapore) for Sanger’s sequencing. 16S rRNA genes from two samples GD013 and GD018 were also sequenced to confirm the validity of the internal control primers.


## 2.4. Modified Hodge Test (MHT)

The MHT was carried out on all isolates, following the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guide on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA–Becton Diskinson, US) using 10μg meropenem (MEM) disks (Nam Khoa Biotech, Vietnam) [33].Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1705 andKlebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1706 were used as a positive control and a negative control, respectively.


## 2.5. Combined Disk Test (PBA/IPM–EDTA/IPM)

Phenylboronic acid solution was prepared by dissolving 2g phenylboronic acid (PBA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) in 100mL solution containing 50mL distilled water and 50mL Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Xilong medical, China). EDTA 0.25M solution prepared by mixing 18.61g disodium ETDA.2H2O in 200 mL of distilled water was adjusted to pH 8.0 by using NaOH. Both solutions were autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes. Either 20μL phenylboronic acid solution (400μg PBA) or 10μL EDTA solution (930μg EDTA) was added on a 10μg imipenem disk (IPM) to get a PBA/IPM or EDTA/IPM disk, respectively. These disks were used within 1 hour.A bacterial suspension with McFarland Equivalence Turbidity Standard 0.5 was streaked on MHA plate using a swab. Three disks, IPM, EDTA/IPM, and PBA/IPM, were placed on the MHA plate with the distance from one disk to another being at least 24 mm.Klebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1705 andKlebsiella pneumoniaeATCC®BAA–1706 were used as a positive control and a negative control, respectively. An increase of 7 mm for EDTA/IPM or 5 mm for PBA/IPM in the diameter of the zone of inhibition compared to that of IPM was considered as a positive result for NDM or KPC production, respectively.


## 2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were entered using Excel 2010, and all statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM Corp. 2013). We determined characteristics of patients carrying carbapenemase-producing bacteria with 95% confidence interval (CI); odds ratio (OR) was calculated. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables. Independent sample t-test was used for comparing the mean ages of the two groups.Real-time PCR was considered as a gold standard method. Sensitivity and specificity, negative predictive values (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) were also calculated. These values of MHT and CDT were compared using the nonparametric McNemar’s test.P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistical significance.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Results

#### 3.1.1. Characteristics of Carbapenemase-Producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae at 2 Hospitals in the Southern Vietnam

In general, of 100 strains from clinical samples (50 isolates ofE. coli and 50 isolates ofK. pneumoniae), 47 isolates were positive by real-time PCR. In those positive strains, 36 carriedblaNDM, 10 carriedblaKPC, and one carried both genes. 58.3% (21/36) strains carryingblaNDM and 80% (8/10) strains carryingblaKPC wereK. pneumoniae. The one carried both genes wasE. coli. CRE were mainly isolated from sputum (37%) and urine (31%). Samples were collected from 13 different sites of ICU (14%), Department of Urologic Surgery (14%), Infectious Disease Department (17%), Geriatrics Department (9%), Respiratory Department (9%), and some other departments (37%). The majority of the study participants were male (55%). The average age was 66.9 (95% CI: 63.6–70.9), the youngest patient was 23, and the oldest one was 94. The proportion of people aged 60 years and older was 69%; the odd ratio of patients in the elder group infected byE. coliorK. pneumoniae having carbapenemase-encoding genes was 3.18 (95% CI: 1.28–7.89) compared to the other group. Furthermore, in Dong Nai General Hospital, the number of the elders infected by NDM/KPC producers was significantly higher than that of the younger ones (p=0.001). The prevalence of pneumonia was 29.0%, the odd of CP-E/K infected patients with pneumonia was 2.32 (95% CI: 0.93–5.78) compared to CP-E/K infected patients without pneumonia; the odd of elders with pneumonia was 9.32 (95% CI: 2.05–42.29) compared to the younger ones.Moreover, data from our study indicated that the rate of CPE is different between the two hospitals. NDM-producing organisms were the major pathogens in Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (45.8%). The prevalence of bacteria carryingblaNDM andblaKPC seems to be the same in Dong Nai General Hospital (22% forblaNDM versus 19.5% forblaKPC) (Figure 1). Other characteristics of CRE infected patients were described in Figures 1 and 2, Tables 2 and 3.Table 2
Distribution of diseases.
Hospital  Disease Total Pneumonia UTI Wound Infection Abnormal Infection Bacteremia Fever Surgical Wound Infection Other GD(N=59) E 2 14 5 0 5 2 0 1 29 K 13 9 2 1 2 2 1 0 30  DN(N=41) E 3 10 3 0 0 1 2 2 21 K 11 2 3 0 0 0 2 2 20  Total  29 35 13 1 7 5 5 5 100 ∗E: E. coli, K: K. pneumoniae, GD: Gia Dinh People’s Hospital, DN: Dong Nai General Hospital, UTI: Urinary Tract Infection.Table 3
Particular characteristics of patients at 2 hospitals in this study.
Characters Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (n=59) Dong Nai General Hospital (n=41) P-value Average age (95% CI) 71.5 (67.4 – 75.2) 60.4 (52.2 – 66) 0.003 Range 36 – 94 23 – 89 Elder (%) 76.3 58.5 0.079 Positive rate (%) 50.8 41.5 0.545 Pneumonia rate (%) 25.4 34.1 Odd of Outcome (Pos/Neg) between Pneumonia and the other 0.79 7.14 Odd of Pneumonia (Elder/Younger) 5.88 18.91 Odd of Outcome (Positive/Negative) in Elder group/ the other. 1.045 15 Therapy departments (%) ICU (20.3),Geriatrics (15.3),  Department of Urologic surgery (10.2), Respiratory Department (8.5), and other departments (45.7) Infectious Disease Department (41.4)Department of surgery (19.5), Respiratory Department (9.8), ICU (4.9), and other departments (24.4) K. pneumoniae (%) 50.8 48.8Figure 1
Different distribution of patients’ age following genotype at 2 hospitals.Figure 2
Different distribution of prevalence of CPE at 2 hospitals.


#### 3.1.2. Molecular Detection

The conformity of three methods was illustrated in Table3.


#### 3.1.3. The Modified Hodge Test (MHT)

All isolates were evaluated by using the MHT and real-time PCR. This method showed low sensitivity and specificity compared to real-time PCR, especially inK. pneumoniae. 38% (23/53) of strains were positive with the MHT whereas the real-time PCR results were negative. 8/47 strains were real-time PCR positive but negative for the MHT, and 7 of those 8 strains carriedblaNDM. The sensitivity and specificity forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 72.2%, 68.8% and 89.1%, 38.1%, respectively. Moreover, the PPV and NPV forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 56.5%, 81.5% and 66.7 %, 72.7%, respectively.


#### 3.1.4. Combined Disk Test

In the same way, all isolates were tested using combined disk test (using EDTA and PBA).


### 3.2. Discussion

In our study, the prevalence of NDM and KPC-producing bacteria in both hospitals is high. Furthermore, the figures of NDM and KPC-producing E/K among infected patients were different between the two hospitals, which depend on areas and ages of patients (Figure2). Probably, the high rate of integron and gene cassette carryingE. coliat Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (45/65 strains carrying intergron gene and 32 of these 45 intergron harboring strains carrying gene cassette) [34] led to coharboring of the two genes inE. colistrain. In particular, this is the first report of the presence ofE. coli strain coharboring both genes in Vietnam.The average age of patients and the proportion of elder group at Gia Dinh People’s Hospital were higher than these figures for Dong Nai General Hospital. In Dong Nai General Hospital, people infected by non-NDM/KPC-producing bacteria were young, most of whom were the group in the range from 40 to 60 (Figure1); these young people could be infected with ESBL/AmpC producingE. coli/K. pneumoniae. Another hypothesis might be that the isolates from these patients could carry other carbapenemase-encoding genes, such asblaOXA-48-like, but these mechanisms cause a lower level of resistance [2, 17, 18]. These features could play an important role in the difference of the odd of positive and negative outcome of the elder group between these 2 hospitals. The elders who suffered from pneumonia and infection with the two types of carbapenemase producers were more than the younger ones, especially in Dong Nai General Hospital. The reason for the difference between these two hospitals was still unclear. It could be explained that Gia Dinh People’s Hospital was established for a long time; the severity of illness was quite different compared with Dong Nai General Hospital.Regarding the methods, real-time PCR is an accurate and rapid method to detect the presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes. However, the cost associated with the method is one of the major disadvantages that limits its use in common laboratories in Vietnam. Among various phenotypic methods, MHT recommended in CLSI 2017 is a simple method [33]. In this study, SPC of MHT is low (23/53K. pneumoniae strainswere positive, but negative for the real-time PCR). The possible reason for this is that other types of carbapenemase may present in these bacteria. However, it could be explained that AmpC, ESBLs, or strict requirements of MHT process at each step may cause false positive results [35]. Besides, this method shows low sensitivity to NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae (7/8 strains were found to have a false-negative result) [36, 37]. In our study, the MHT results forK. pneumoniaeare consistent with findings in recent studies conducted by Dariush Shokri et al. [38] and Rangneka R aSeeM et al. [39]. This may be the reason why the CLSI 2018 standard excluded MHT in the guideline [40].In contrast, CDT has been shown to be highly effective. The results of NDM detection by EDTA disk test forK. pneumoniae(Table 4) were in accordance with findings obtained by Paradimitriou–Oliveris et al. [30]. However, it was in contrast to findings reported by Dariush Shokri et al. [38]. This could be explained by the fact that Shokri carried out his study including not onlyK. pneumoniae, but alsoA. baumanii andP. aeruginosa. The high rate ofblaVIM inP. aeruginosamay be the reason for false-negative results. A study conducted by Ting-ting Qu et al. in 2009 showed that CDT also detected other types of carbapenemase includingVerona integron-borne metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), which was the most widespread metallo-β-lactamase inP. aeruginosa [41, 42]. Our results for KPC detection using PBA disk testK. pneumoniae(Table 4) were in accordance with findings obtained by Athanasios Tsakris et al. (using PBA-400μg) [31] and Julio Zúñiga et al. (using 300μg APBA) [43]. The efficiency of PBA disk test inE. coliwas low, particularly in sensitivity and PPV because of the sample size of KPC-producingE. coli, only 3 strains with one of them being a false negative. The results in Tables 5 and 6 illustrated the significantly higher specificity of combined disk test compared with MHT.Table 4
The agreement of bacteria isolation, real-time PCR, and DNA sequencing results.
Strains ID Isolation Real-time PCR DNA sequencing GD013 K. pneumonia blaNDM, 16s rRNA blaNDM, K. pneumoniae GD002 E. coli blaNDM blaNDM GD018 E. coli blaNDM, blaKPC, 16S rRNA blaNDM, blaKPC, E. coli GD011 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPC GD016 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPC DN011 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPCTable 5
Combined disk test results inE. coliand K. pneumonia.
Combined disk test Real-time PCR TPR (%)95% SPC(%) PPV(%) NPV(%) Accuracy(%) Species  Pos Ne NDM detection E. coli (n=50) Pos 15 1 93.8 97.1 93.8 97.1 96.0 Neg 1 33 K. pneumoniae (n=50) Pos 19 0 90.5 100 100 93.6 96 Neg 2 29  KPC detection E. coli (n=50) Pos 2 2 66.7 95.7 50 97.8 94.0 Neg 1 45 K. pneumoniae (n=50) Pos 8 3 100 92.9 72.7 100 94 Neg 0 39 ∗Pos: positive, Neg: negative.Table 6
Comparison between the MHT and combined disk test.
Bacteria Index NDM detection KPC detection MHT EDTA McNemar ∗ MHT Boronic McNemar ∗ E. coli(n=50) TPR (%) 72.2 93.8 p=0.25 72.2 66.7 p=1.00 SPC (%) 68.8 97.1 p=0.006 68.8 95.7 p<0.001  K. pneumoniae(n=50) TPR (%) 89.7 90.5 p=1.00 89.7 100 NC SPC (%) 38.1 100 p<0.001 38.1 92.9 p<0.001 ∗ means nonparametric McNemar test.


## 3.1. Results

### 3.1.1. Characteristics of Carbapenemase-Producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae at 2 Hospitals in the Southern Vietnam

In general, of 100 strains from clinical samples (50 isolates ofE. coli and 50 isolates ofK. pneumoniae), 47 isolates were positive by real-time PCR. In those positive strains, 36 carriedblaNDM, 10 carriedblaKPC, and one carried both genes. 58.3% (21/36) strains carryingblaNDM and 80% (8/10) strains carryingblaKPC wereK. pneumoniae. The one carried both genes wasE. coli. CRE were mainly isolated from sputum (37%) and urine (31%). Samples were collected from 13 different sites of ICU (14%), Department of Urologic Surgery (14%), Infectious Disease Department (17%), Geriatrics Department (9%), Respiratory Department (9%), and some other departments (37%). The majority of the study participants were male (55%). The average age was 66.9 (95% CI: 63.6–70.9), the youngest patient was 23, and the oldest one was 94. The proportion of people aged 60 years and older was 69%; the odd ratio of patients in the elder group infected byE. coliorK. pneumoniae having carbapenemase-encoding genes was 3.18 (95% CI: 1.28–7.89) compared to the other group. Furthermore, in Dong Nai General Hospital, the number of the elders infected by NDM/KPC producers was significantly higher than that of the younger ones (p=0.001). The prevalence of pneumonia was 29.0%, the odd of CP-E/K infected patients with pneumonia was 2.32 (95% CI: 0.93–5.78) compared to CP-E/K infected patients without pneumonia; the odd of elders with pneumonia was 9.32 (95% CI: 2.05–42.29) compared to the younger ones.Moreover, data from our study indicated that the rate of CPE is different between the two hospitals. NDM-producing organisms were the major pathogens in Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (45.8%). The prevalence of bacteria carryingblaNDM andblaKPC seems to be the same in Dong Nai General Hospital (22% forblaNDM versus 19.5% forblaKPC) (Figure 1). Other characteristics of CRE infected patients were described in Figures 1 and 2, Tables 2 and 3.Table 2
Distribution of diseases.
Hospital  Disease Total Pneumonia UTI Wound Infection Abnormal Infection Bacteremia Fever Surgical Wound Infection Other GD(N=59) E 2 14 5 0 5 2 0 1 29 K 13 9 2 1 2 2 1 0 30  DN(N=41) E 3 10 3 0 0 1 2 2 21 K 11 2 3 0 0 0 2 2 20  Total  29 35 13 1 7 5 5 5 100 ∗E: E. coli, K: K. pneumoniae, GD: Gia Dinh People’s Hospital, DN: Dong Nai General Hospital, UTI: Urinary Tract Infection.Table 3
Particular characteristics of patients at 2 hospitals in this study.
Characters Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (n=59) Dong Nai General Hospital (n=41) P-value Average age (95% CI) 71.5 (67.4 – 75.2) 60.4 (52.2 – 66) 0.003 Range 36 – 94 23 – 89 Elder (%) 76.3 58.5 0.079 Positive rate (%) 50.8 41.5 0.545 Pneumonia rate (%) 25.4 34.1 Odd of Outcome (Pos/Neg) between Pneumonia and the other 0.79 7.14 Odd of Pneumonia (Elder/Younger) 5.88 18.91 Odd of Outcome (Positive/Negative) in Elder group/ the other. 1.045 15 Therapy departments (%) ICU (20.3),Geriatrics (15.3),  Department of Urologic surgery (10.2), Respiratory Department (8.5), and other departments (45.7) Infectious Disease Department (41.4)Department of surgery (19.5), Respiratory Department (9.8), ICU (4.9), and other departments (24.4) K. pneumoniae (%) 50.8 48.8Figure 1
Different distribution of patients’ age following genotype at 2 hospitals.Figure 2
Different distribution of prevalence of CPE at 2 hospitals.


### 3.1.2. Molecular Detection

The conformity of three methods was illustrated in Table3.


### 3.1.3. The Modified Hodge Test (MHT)

All isolates were evaluated by using the MHT and real-time PCR. This method showed low sensitivity and specificity compared to real-time PCR, especially inK. pneumoniae. 38% (23/53) of strains were positive with the MHT whereas the real-time PCR results were negative. 8/47 strains were real-time PCR positive but negative for the MHT, and 7 of those 8 strains carriedblaNDM. The sensitivity and specificity forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 72.2%, 68.8% and 89.1%, 38.1%, respectively. Moreover, the PPV and NPV forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 56.5%, 81.5% and 66.7 %, 72.7%, respectively.


### 3.1.4. Combined Disk Test

In the same way, all isolates were tested using combined disk test (using EDTA and PBA).


## 3.1.1. Characteristics of Carbapenemase-Producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae at 2 Hospitals in the Southern Vietnam

In general, of 100 strains from clinical samples (50 isolates ofE. coli and 50 isolates ofK. pneumoniae), 47 isolates were positive by real-time PCR. In those positive strains, 36 carriedblaNDM, 10 carriedblaKPC, and one carried both genes. 58.3% (21/36) strains carryingblaNDM and 80% (8/10) strains carryingblaKPC wereK. pneumoniae. The one carried both genes wasE. coli. CRE were mainly isolated from sputum (37%) and urine (31%). Samples were collected from 13 different sites of ICU (14%), Department of Urologic Surgery (14%), Infectious Disease Department (17%), Geriatrics Department (9%), Respiratory Department (9%), and some other departments (37%). The majority of the study participants were male (55%). The average age was 66.9 (95% CI: 63.6–70.9), the youngest patient was 23, and the oldest one was 94. The proportion of people aged 60 years and older was 69%; the odd ratio of patients in the elder group infected byE. coliorK. pneumoniae having carbapenemase-encoding genes was 3.18 (95% CI: 1.28–7.89) compared to the other group. Furthermore, in Dong Nai General Hospital, the number of the elders infected by NDM/KPC producers was significantly higher than that of the younger ones (p=0.001). The prevalence of pneumonia was 29.0%, the odd of CP-E/K infected patients with pneumonia was 2.32 (95% CI: 0.93–5.78) compared to CP-E/K infected patients without pneumonia; the odd of elders with pneumonia was 9.32 (95% CI: 2.05–42.29) compared to the younger ones.Moreover, data from our study indicated that the rate of CPE is different between the two hospitals. NDM-producing organisms were the major pathogens in Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (45.8%). The prevalence of bacteria carryingblaNDM andblaKPC seems to be the same in Dong Nai General Hospital (22% forblaNDM versus 19.5% forblaKPC) (Figure 1). Other characteristics of CRE infected patients were described in Figures 1 and 2, Tables 2 and 3.Table 2
Distribution of diseases.
Hospital  Disease Total Pneumonia UTI Wound Infection Abnormal Infection Bacteremia Fever Surgical Wound Infection Other GD(N=59) E 2 14 5 0 5 2 0 1 29 K 13 9 2 1 2 2 1 0 30  DN(N=41) E 3 10 3 0 0 1 2 2 21 K 11 2 3 0 0 0 2 2 20  Total  29 35 13 1 7 5 5 5 100 ∗E: E. coli, K: K. pneumoniae, GD: Gia Dinh People’s Hospital, DN: Dong Nai General Hospital, UTI: Urinary Tract Infection.Table 3
Particular characteristics of patients at 2 hospitals in this study.
Characters Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (n=59) Dong Nai General Hospital (n=41) P-value Average age (95% CI) 71.5 (67.4 – 75.2) 60.4 (52.2 – 66) 0.003 Range 36 – 94 23 – 89 Elder (%) 76.3 58.5 0.079 Positive rate (%) 50.8 41.5 0.545 Pneumonia rate (%) 25.4 34.1 Odd of Outcome (Pos/Neg) between Pneumonia and the other 0.79 7.14 Odd of Pneumonia (Elder/Younger) 5.88 18.91 Odd of Outcome (Positive/Negative) in Elder group/ the other. 1.045 15 Therapy departments (%) ICU (20.3),Geriatrics (15.3),  Department of Urologic surgery (10.2), Respiratory Department (8.5), and other departments (45.7) Infectious Disease Department (41.4)Department of surgery (19.5), Respiratory Department (9.8), ICU (4.9), and other departments (24.4) K. pneumoniae (%) 50.8 48.8Figure 1
Different distribution of patients’ age following genotype at 2 hospitals.Figure 2
Different distribution of prevalence of CPE at 2 hospitals.


## 3.1.2. Molecular Detection

The conformity of three methods was illustrated in Table3.


## 3.1.3. The Modified Hodge Test (MHT)

All isolates were evaluated by using the MHT and real-time PCR. This method showed low sensitivity and specificity compared to real-time PCR, especially inK. pneumoniae. 38% (23/53) of strains were positive with the MHT whereas the real-time PCR results were negative. 8/47 strains were real-time PCR positive but negative for the MHT, and 7 of those 8 strains carriedblaNDM. The sensitivity and specificity forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 72.2%, 68.8% and 89.1%, 38.1%, respectively. Moreover, the PPV and NPV forE. coli andK. pneumoniaewere 56.5%, 81.5% and 66.7 %, 72.7%, respectively.


## 3.1.4. Combined Disk Test

In the same way, all isolates were tested using combined disk test (using EDTA and PBA).


## 3.2. Discussion

In our study, the prevalence of NDM and KPC-producing bacteria in both hospitals is high. Furthermore, the figures of NDM and KPC-producing E/K among infected patients were different between the two hospitals, which depend on areas and ages of patients (Figure2). Probably, the high rate of integron and gene cassette carryingE. coliat Gia Dinh People’s Hospital (45/65 strains carrying intergron gene and 32 of these 45 intergron harboring strains carrying gene cassette) [34] led to coharboring of the two genes inE. colistrain. In particular, this is the first report of the presence ofE. coli strain coharboring both genes in Vietnam.The average age of patients and the proportion of elder group at Gia Dinh People’s Hospital were higher than these figures for Dong Nai General Hospital. In Dong Nai General Hospital, people infected by non-NDM/KPC-producing bacteria were young, most of whom were the group in the range from 40 to 60 (Figure1); these young people could be infected with ESBL/AmpC producingE. coli/K. pneumoniae. Another hypothesis might be that the isolates from these patients could carry other carbapenemase-encoding genes, such asblaOXA-48-like, but these mechanisms cause a lower level of resistance [2, 17, 18]. These features could play an important role in the difference of the odd of positive and negative outcome of the elder group between these 2 hospitals. The elders who suffered from pneumonia and infection with the two types of carbapenemase producers were more than the younger ones, especially in Dong Nai General Hospital. The reason for the difference between these two hospitals was still unclear. It could be explained that Gia Dinh People’s Hospital was established for a long time; the severity of illness was quite different compared with Dong Nai General Hospital.Regarding the methods, real-time PCR is an accurate and rapid method to detect the presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes. However, the cost associated with the method is one of the major disadvantages that limits its use in common laboratories in Vietnam. Among various phenotypic methods, MHT recommended in CLSI 2017 is a simple method [33]. In this study, SPC of MHT is low (23/53K. pneumoniae strainswere positive, but negative for the real-time PCR). The possible reason for this is that other types of carbapenemase may present in these bacteria. However, it could be explained that AmpC, ESBLs, or strict requirements of MHT process at each step may cause false positive results [35]. Besides, this method shows low sensitivity to NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae (7/8 strains were found to have a false-negative result) [36, 37]. In our study, the MHT results forK. pneumoniaeare consistent with findings in recent studies conducted by Dariush Shokri et al. [38] and Rangneka R aSeeM et al. [39]. This may be the reason why the CLSI 2018 standard excluded MHT in the guideline [40].In contrast, CDT has been shown to be highly effective. The results of NDM detection by EDTA disk test forK. pneumoniae(Table 4) were in accordance with findings obtained by Paradimitriou–Oliveris et al. [30]. However, it was in contrast to findings reported by Dariush Shokri et al. [38]. This could be explained by the fact that Shokri carried out his study including not onlyK. pneumoniae, but alsoA. baumanii andP. aeruginosa. The high rate ofblaVIM inP. aeruginosamay be the reason for false-negative results. A study conducted by Ting-ting Qu et al. in 2009 showed that CDT also detected other types of carbapenemase includingVerona integron-borne metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), which was the most widespread metallo-β-lactamase inP. aeruginosa [41, 42]. Our results for KPC detection using PBA disk testK. pneumoniae(Table 4) were in accordance with findings obtained by Athanasios Tsakris et al. (using PBA-400μg) [31] and Julio Zúñiga et al. (using 300μg APBA) [43]. The efficiency of PBA disk test inE. coliwas low, particularly in sensitivity and PPV because of the sample size of KPC-producingE. coli, only 3 strains with one of them being a false negative. The results in Tables 5 and 6 illustrated the significantly higher specificity of combined disk test compared with MHT.Table 4
The agreement of bacteria isolation, real-time PCR, and DNA sequencing results.
Strains ID Isolation Real-time PCR DNA sequencing GD013 K. pneumonia blaNDM, 16s rRNA blaNDM, K. pneumoniae GD002 E. coli blaNDM blaNDM GD018 E. coli blaNDM, blaKPC, 16S rRNA blaNDM, blaKPC, E. coli GD011 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPC GD016 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPC DN011 K. pneumoniae blaKPC blaKPCTable 5
Combined disk test results inE. coliand K. pneumonia.
Combined disk test Real-time PCR TPR (%)95% SPC(%) PPV(%) NPV(%) Accuracy(%) Species  Pos Ne NDM detection E. coli (n=50) Pos 15 1 93.8 97.1 93.8 97.1 96.0 Neg 1 33 K. pneumoniae (n=50) Pos 19 0 90.5 100 100 93.6 96 Neg 2 29  KPC detection E. coli (n=50) Pos 2 2 66.7 95.7 50 97.8 94.0 Neg 1 45 K. pneumoniae (n=50) Pos 8 3 100 92.9 72.7 100 94 Neg 0 39 ∗Pos: positive, Neg: negative.Table 6
Comparison between the MHT and combined disk test.
Bacteria Index NDM detection KPC detection MHT EDTA McNemar ∗ MHT Boronic McNemar ∗ E. coli(n=50) TPR (%) 72.2 93.8 p=0.25 72.2 66.7 p=1.00 SPC (%) 68.8 97.1 p=0.006 68.8 95.7 p<0.001  K. pneumoniae(n=50) TPR (%) 89.7 90.5 p=1.00 89.7 100 NC SPC (%) 38.1 100 p<0.001 38.1 92.9 p<0.001 ∗ means nonparametric McNemar test.


## 4. Conclusions

The prevalence of CP-E/K in Vietnam is high. The lack of suitable methods to detect and differentiate these bacterial infections has been the main obstacle for clinicians to choosing an appropriate treatment. During this study, we recognized that CDT is reasonable and simple to detect the presence of these important enzymes. These features make it highly applicable to all clinical laboratories in Vietnam.



---

*Source: 9757625-2019-04-23.xml*