# A New Alternative Synthesis of Salicylaldazine via Microwave Irradiation Method

Authors: Karimah Kassim; Muhamad Azwan Hamali; Bohari Yamin
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

Two diazine Schiff base ligands, HLa and HLb, derived from thiocarbohydrazide and salicylaldehyde derivatives were synthesized using the microwave-assisted synthesis approach. The confirmation of both ligands was elucidated through physiochemical and spectroscopy techniques as well as single X-ray crystallography diffraction. The analyses showed that the ligands synthesized were formed as azine instead of thiocarbohydrazone based on the missing thione, C=S moiety, throughout FTIR and NMR spectrascopic data. This finding was further concluded by X-ray crystal analysis. The biological properties of these ligands were screened using the disc diffusion method. The result shows that HLb shows significant inhibition towards all of the bacteria tested.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Schiff bases, compounds derived from the condensation reaction of primary amine with carbonyl compounds are considered as “privileged ligand” by many due to its stability and structural design [1]. The azomethine (C=N) group found in Schiff base compounds is known to be biologically active. Thus, it received significant attention in chemistry and biology for its various properties such as antitumor [2], anti-inflammatory [3], and antimicrobial [4, 5].The usage of microwave irradiation as nonconventional energy source in synthesizing organic and inorganic compounds has received interesting attention among the researchers due to the clean, convenient, and cost-effective method [6]. The heating up using microwave irradiation by “in-core” heating not only shortens the reaction time but also enhances product yield as well as enhances the purity by reducing unnecessary side reaction [7, 8].A previous work [9] uses the two-step method in synthesizing salicylaldehyde azine Schiff base by obtaining a thiocarbohydrazone as intermediate before adding pyridine as catalyst to form azine. In this paper, a similar salicylaldehyde azine was resynthesized using the new alternative method through microwave irradiation. This method offers a new shorter route without obtaining an intermediate compound producing higher % yield. The structures were elucidated using physical and spectroscopy analyses and screened for biological activities.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. General

All chemicals and reagents used in this synthesis work were commercially purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck and of the analytical reagent (AR) grade. The solvents for the synthesis were used without further purification. The reactions were carried out using Anton Paar Monowave 450 in G30 boron silicate vials. Elemental microanalysis (C, H, and N) of the ligands was performed on a Thermo Flash EA 110 Elemental Analyzer. Melting points were measured with a Stuart Melting Point SMP10. The IR spectra were recorded using KBr discs in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 using a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR 1600 spectrophotometer .1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 300 MHz, and the samples were dissolved in DMSO-d6 solvent.


### 2.2. Preparation of 2,2′-{[(E,E)-Hydrazine-1,2-diylidene]bis(methanylidene)}diphenol (HLa)

The ligand was synthesized as shown in Figure1. A solution of thiocarbohydrazide (2.5 mmol, 0.27 g) in 5 mL of 80% ethanol was added to an ethanolic solution of salicylaldehyde (5 mmol, 0.61 g). The mixture was then irradiated in the microwave for 5 minutes at 160°C. A clear yellowish solution was obtained, and yellow microcrystalline was formed upon cooling. The microcrystalline was separated from the solvent through filtration and washed with cold ethanol and diethyl ether. Yield: 82%; m.p.: 224–228°C; anal. calcd for C14H14N2O2 (%): C, 70.85; H, 5.55; N, 11.02; found: C, 69.93; H, 4.80; N, 10.00; IR (λ max cm−1) (KBr): 2971 (OH), 1619 (C=N), 1524 (C=C), 1322 (C–O phenolic), 969 (N–N); 1H NMR δ (ppm): 11.14 (s, 2H, phenolic OH), 9.02 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.71–6.96 (m, 6H, aromatic).Figure 1
General pathway of synthesizing HLa and HLb ligands.


### 2.3. Preparation of 5,5′-Dimethoxy-2,2′-{[(E,E)-hydrazine-1,2-diylidene]bis(methanylidene)}diphenol (HLb)

To a 5 mL ethanolic solution of 5-methoxysalicylaldehyde (5 mmol, 0.27 g), thiocarbohydrazide (0.25 mmol, 0.76 g) in 5 mL of 80% ethanol was added before placing the mixture in the microwave reactor. The mixture was irradiated at 160°C for 5 minutes. A resultant bright yellow microcrystalline was obtained. The microcrystalline product was filtered and rinsed with cold ethanol and diethyl ether. Yield: 95%; m.p.: 218–224°C; anal. calcd for C16H16N2O4 (%): C, 63.99; H, 5.37; N, 9.33; found: C, 62.95; H, 5.28; N, 8.88; IR (λ max cm−1) (KBr): 3141 (OH), 2939 (CH3), 1606 (C=N), 1577 (C=C), 1322 (C–O phenolic), 940 (N–N); 1H NMR δ (ppm): 10.60 (s, 2H, phenolic OH), 8.96 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.29–6.91 (m, 6H, aromatic), 2.95 (s, 6H, CH3).


### 2.4. Antibacterial Study

Antibacterial test of pathogens was carried out by using the disc diffusion method according to [10]. The bacteria from stock culture were lightly inoculated into the Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) and let to grow overnight at 37°C in an ambient air incubator. The culture was diluted with new MHB in order to achieve an optical density of 0.1 at wavelength of 625 nm in the spectrophotometer. Later, a sterile cotton swab was dipped into the broth culture and inoculated on the Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA). A 200 μg/mL of synthesized compounds was individually dissolved in DMSO before impregnating on a sterile Whatman 6 mm diameter disc and placed onto the surface of the agar containing the tested bacteria. The agar plate was incubated at 37°C for overnight. For each bacteria plate, gentamicin was used as positive control, while DMSO acted as negative control. The inhibition zone on the plate was recorded and measured in diameter (mm).


## 2.1. General

All chemicals and reagents used in this synthesis work were commercially purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck and of the analytical reagent (AR) grade. The solvents for the synthesis were used without further purification. The reactions were carried out using Anton Paar Monowave 450 in G30 boron silicate vials. Elemental microanalysis (C, H, and N) of the ligands was performed on a Thermo Flash EA 110 Elemental Analyzer. Melting points were measured with a Stuart Melting Point SMP10. The IR spectra were recorded using KBr discs in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 using a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR 1600 spectrophotometer .1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 300 MHz, and the samples were dissolved in DMSO-d6 solvent.


## 2.2. Preparation of 2,2′-{[(E,E)-Hydrazine-1,2-diylidene]bis(methanylidene)}diphenol (HLa)

The ligand was synthesized as shown in Figure1. A solution of thiocarbohydrazide (2.5 mmol, 0.27 g) in 5 mL of 80% ethanol was added to an ethanolic solution of salicylaldehyde (5 mmol, 0.61 g). The mixture was then irradiated in the microwave for 5 minutes at 160°C. A clear yellowish solution was obtained, and yellow microcrystalline was formed upon cooling. The microcrystalline was separated from the solvent through filtration and washed with cold ethanol and diethyl ether. Yield: 82%; m.p.: 224–228°C; anal. calcd for C14H14N2O2 (%): C, 70.85; H, 5.55; N, 11.02; found: C, 69.93; H, 4.80; N, 10.00; IR (λ max cm−1) (KBr): 2971 (OH), 1619 (C=N), 1524 (C=C), 1322 (C–O phenolic), 969 (N–N); 1H NMR δ (ppm): 11.14 (s, 2H, phenolic OH), 9.02 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.71–6.96 (m, 6H, aromatic).Figure 1
General pathway of synthesizing HLa and HLb ligands.


## 2.3. Preparation of 5,5′-Dimethoxy-2,2′-{[(E,E)-hydrazine-1,2-diylidene]bis(methanylidene)}diphenol (HLb)

To a 5 mL ethanolic solution of 5-methoxysalicylaldehyde (5 mmol, 0.27 g), thiocarbohydrazide (0.25 mmol, 0.76 g) in 5 mL of 80% ethanol was added before placing the mixture in the microwave reactor. The mixture was irradiated at 160°C for 5 minutes. A resultant bright yellow microcrystalline was obtained. The microcrystalline product was filtered and rinsed with cold ethanol and diethyl ether. Yield: 95%; m.p.: 218–224°C; anal. calcd for C16H16N2O4 (%): C, 63.99; H, 5.37; N, 9.33; found: C, 62.95; H, 5.28; N, 8.88; IR (λ max cm−1) (KBr): 3141 (OH), 2939 (CH3), 1606 (C=N), 1577 (C=C), 1322 (C–O phenolic), 940 (N–N); 1H NMR δ (ppm): 10.60 (s, 2H, phenolic OH), 8.96 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.29–6.91 (m, 6H, aromatic), 2.95 (s, 6H, CH3).


## 2.4. Antibacterial Study

Antibacterial test of pathogens was carried out by using the disc diffusion method according to [10]. The bacteria from stock culture were lightly inoculated into the Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) and let to grow overnight at 37°C in an ambient air incubator. The culture was diluted with new MHB in order to achieve an optical density of 0.1 at wavelength of 625 nm in the spectrophotometer. Later, a sterile cotton swab was dipped into the broth culture and inoculated on the Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA). A 200 μg/mL of synthesized compounds was individually dissolved in DMSO before impregnating on a sterile Whatman 6 mm diameter disc and placed onto the surface of the agar containing the tested bacteria. The agar plate was incubated at 37°C for overnight. For each bacteria plate, gentamicin was used as positive control, while DMSO acted as negative control. The inhibition zone on the plate was recorded and measured in diameter (mm).


## 3. Results and Discussion

The percentages of elemental analysis of both ligands are closely similar to the theoretical values. Both ligands have a low melting point range (within 6–8°C), suggesting that the purity of the synthesized compound is high.


### 3.1. Infrared Spectroscopy

The experimental IR spectra for both ligands shown in Figure2 exhibited strong absorptions around 1619–1606 cm−1, 1577–1524 cm−1, and 1322–1318 cm−1, which are attributed to the azomethine (C=N), aromatic benzene (C=C), and phenolic oxygen (C-O) functional groups, respectively. A sharp and strong peak found at 3291 cm−1 in the HLb spectra was designated to the C-H of the methoxy group (O-CH3). The weak and broad peak of hydroxyl (OH) indicated the presence of intermolecular hydrogen bond formed between phenolic hydrogen with azomethine nitrogen (OH⋯N=C). In an earlier work, Chee et al. [5] synthesized a thiocarbohydrazone by reaction of similar amine with ketone instead of aldehyde. The infrared spectra of the thiocarbohydrazone shows a peak at 1232 cm−1, signifying the presence of thione (C=S) in the ligand. This peak was found to be absent in both HLa and HLb spectra, and it was concluded that the C=S was decomposed during the synthesis of azine ligands.Figure 2
Infrared spectrum of (a) HLa and (b) HLb.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2.1H and 13C NMR

The1H and 13C NMR spectra of HLa and HLb were recorded in DMSO-d6. In 1H NMR, the–OH appeared as singlet at 11.14 ppm and 10.60 ppm for HLa and HLb, respectively. The formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl proton and the azomethine nitrogen causes the signal to appear at the downfield region as well as the deshielding effect of oxygen [11]. The singlet azomethine proton, HC=N of HLa and HLb, was found at 9.02 ppm and 8.96 ppm, respectively. The chemical shift of aromatic benzene of both ligands appeared as multiplets in the vicinity of 7.71–6.69 ppm for HLa and 7.29–6.91 ppm for HLb. The proton benzene in HLb experienced a shielding due to the substituent effect caused by the presence of the methoxy group –OCH3. The methoxy group is an electron-donating group which adds electron density to the aromatic π-system, causing it to be more nucleophilic. The peak of methoxy protons of HLb can be found at the upperfield region of 3.37 ppm. The 1H NMR spectra of ligands HLa and HLb are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.Figure 3
1H NMR spectrum of the ligand HLa.Figure 4
1H NMR spectrum of the ligand HLb.In13C NMR spectra of HLa and HLb ligands, the azomethine carbon, C=N, was found to be at 159.12 ppm and 153.24 ppm, respectively. As for C-OH, the signal appears downfield, at 163.25 ppm and 162.46 ppm, respectively. The absence of thione carbon, C=S peak in the spectra, in concordance to its absence in the FTIR spectra further convinced the microwave reaction of thiocarbohydrazide with salicylaldehyde derivatives, resulting in the formation of azine instead of thiocarbohydrazone.


### 3.3. Conventional Reflux vs. Microwave Irradiation

A comparison was made between conventional reflux used by previous literature [9] and the microwave irradiation method in synthesizing the HLa ligand and tabulated in Table 1. Previous work performed yields 15% higher compared to current work. Despite the high yield, the process in obtaining the final product involves the two-step method that takes up to a total of 27 hours of reaction time, with the usage of ethanol and pyridine as solvents, in contrary to the microwave irradiation method which is able to complete the synthesis in 5 minutes (single-step method), using only ethanol as the solvent. The important 1H NMR spectra of the important peaks also do not show any significant difference, thus maintaining and confirming the similarity of the structure HLa in both works.Table 1
Comparison between conventional reflux and microwave irradiation in synthesizing HLa.
Conventional reflux
Microwave irradiation
Yield (%)
97
82
Total reaction time
27 hours
5 min
Solvent used
EtOH and pyridine
80% EtOH
1H NMR peaks (ppm)
-OH = 11.10HC = N = 9.0Ar–H = 7.7–7.0
-OH = 11.14HC = N = 9.02Ar–H = 7.71–6.96The mass reduction in reaction time, number, and volume of solvent used in the microwave irradiation method while maintaining the purity not only improved the way of synthesizing HLa ligand but also minimized the cost and wastage in line with the Principle of Green Chemistry [12].


### 3.4. X-Ray Crystallography

Slow evaporation of ligand HLb in dichloromethane/ethanol mixture solvent gives needle-like crystal, which is suitable for X-ray crystallography analysis. The structure of HLb is illustrated in Figure5, and the crystal data are tabulated in Table 2.Figure 5
ORTEP view of ligand HLb. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% ellipsoid probability.Table 2
Crystal data of HLb.
Empirical formula
C16 H16 N2 O4
Formula weight
300.31
Temperature
273(2) K
Wavelength
0.71073 Å
Crystal system
Monoclinic
Space group
P 21/c
Unit cell dimensions
a = 6.7171(9) Å
α = 90°
b = 15.947(2) Å
β = 91.201(4)°
c = 6.8061(9) Å
γ = 90°
Volume
728.88(17) Å3
Z
2
Density (calculated)
1.368 mg/m3
Absorption coefficient
0.100 mm−1
Crystal size
0.350 × 0.230 × 0.170 mm3
Theta range for data collection
3.033 to 28.356°
Reflections collected
21681
Independent reflections
1808 [R(int) = 0.0785]
Completeness to theta = 25.242°
99.8%
Refinement method
Full-matrix least-squares onF2
Data/restraints/parameters
1808/1/105
Goodness-of-fit onF2
1.182
FinalR indices (I > 2sigma(I))
R
1 = 0.0746, wR2 = 0.1275
R indices (all data)
R
1 = 0.1293, wR2 = 0.1459The ligand HLb possessed a similar structure as reported by Randell et al. [13], with substituted methoxy group on the fifth benzene carbon. The inversion center about the N1-N1A bond adopts a centrosymmetric E,E configuration with respect to C7=N1 and the torsion angle of N1A–N1–C7–C1 = 179.3(2)°, conforming the presence of benzylidene as well as the imine bond formation. The whole molecule is essentially planar with the exception of the C8 and C8A atom with the maximum deviation of 0.113(3)°. The intramolecular hydrogen bond between N1-H1⋯O1 and D-H⋯ A distance of 142(3) A forms a stable six-membered hydrogen bound ring.


### 3.5. Antibacterial Study

Both azine ligands, HLa and HLb, were screened for antibacterial activity by the disc diffusion method, and the zone of inhibition is measured in millimeters, as tabulated in Table3. A total of six bacterial strains were used to evaluate the biological properties of the ligands.Table 3
Relative diameter of the inhibition zone exhibited by the ligands HLa and HLb.
Strain
Diameter of inhibition (mm)
HLa
HLb
Gentamicin
B. cereus
—
8
23
B. subtilis
—
9
23
S. aureus
8
7
25
K. pneumoniae
8
8
16
P. aeruginosa
8
8
23
E. coli
11
7
18HLa is best used againstE. coli, while HLb works great resisting the growth of B. subtilis. Overall, ligand HLb has more resistance towards all six bacterial strains compared to HLa although it is considered weak when compared to standard antibiotic, gentamicin. The substituent effect might be the reason for the enhancement of the biological properties of HLb. The electron-donating group (EDG), methoxy (–CH3), donates electron to the π-system resulting a more nucleophilic π-system. The increases in nucleophilicity leads to the increases of lipophilicity of the compound as explained in Tweedy’s theory [14, 15]. The increased lipophilicity enhances the penetration of the compounds into the lipid membrane, thus enhancing its antimicrobial activities [16].


## 3.1. Infrared Spectroscopy

The experimental IR spectra for both ligands shown in Figure2 exhibited strong absorptions around 1619–1606 cm−1, 1577–1524 cm−1, and 1322–1318 cm−1, which are attributed to the azomethine (C=N), aromatic benzene (C=C), and phenolic oxygen (C-O) functional groups, respectively. A sharp and strong peak found at 3291 cm−1 in the HLb spectra was designated to the C-H of the methoxy group (O-CH3). The weak and broad peak of hydroxyl (OH) indicated the presence of intermolecular hydrogen bond formed between phenolic hydrogen with azomethine nitrogen (OH⋯N=C). In an earlier work, Chee et al. [5] synthesized a thiocarbohydrazone by reaction of similar amine with ketone instead of aldehyde. The infrared spectra of the thiocarbohydrazone shows a peak at 1232 cm−1, signifying the presence of thione (C=S) in the ligand. This peak was found to be absent in both HLa and HLb spectra, and it was concluded that the C=S was decomposed during the synthesis of azine ligands.Figure 2
Infrared spectrum of (a) HLa and (b) HLb.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2.1H and 13C NMR

The1H and 13C NMR spectra of HLa and HLb were recorded in DMSO-d6. In 1H NMR, the–OH appeared as singlet at 11.14 ppm and 10.60 ppm for HLa and HLb, respectively. The formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between hydroxyl proton and the azomethine nitrogen causes the signal to appear at the downfield region as well as the deshielding effect of oxygen [11]. The singlet azomethine proton, HC=N of HLa and HLb, was found at 9.02 ppm and 8.96 ppm, respectively. The chemical shift of aromatic benzene of both ligands appeared as multiplets in the vicinity of 7.71–6.69 ppm for HLa and 7.29–6.91 ppm for HLb. The proton benzene in HLb experienced a shielding due to the substituent effect caused by the presence of the methoxy group –OCH3. The methoxy group is an electron-donating group which adds electron density to the aromatic π-system, causing it to be more nucleophilic. The peak of methoxy protons of HLb can be found at the upperfield region of 3.37 ppm. The 1H NMR spectra of ligands HLa and HLb are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively.Figure 3
1H NMR spectrum of the ligand HLa.Figure 4
1H NMR spectrum of the ligand HLb.In13C NMR spectra of HLa and HLb ligands, the azomethine carbon, C=N, was found to be at 159.12 ppm and 153.24 ppm, respectively. As for C-OH, the signal appears downfield, at 163.25 ppm and 162.46 ppm, respectively. The absence of thione carbon, C=S peak in the spectra, in concordance to its absence in the FTIR spectra further convinced the microwave reaction of thiocarbohydrazide with salicylaldehyde derivatives, resulting in the formation of azine instead of thiocarbohydrazone.


## 3.3. Conventional Reflux vs. Microwave Irradiation

A comparison was made between conventional reflux used by previous literature [9] and the microwave irradiation method in synthesizing the HLa ligand and tabulated in Table 1. Previous work performed yields 15% higher compared to current work. Despite the high yield, the process in obtaining the final product involves the two-step method that takes up to a total of 27 hours of reaction time, with the usage of ethanol and pyridine as solvents, in contrary to the microwave irradiation method which is able to complete the synthesis in 5 minutes (single-step method), using only ethanol as the solvent. The important 1H NMR spectra of the important peaks also do not show any significant difference, thus maintaining and confirming the similarity of the structure HLa in both works.Table 1
Comparison between conventional reflux and microwave irradiation in synthesizing HLa.
Conventional reflux
Microwave irradiation
Yield (%)
97
82
Total reaction time
27 hours
5 min
Solvent used
EtOH and pyridine
80% EtOH
1H NMR peaks (ppm)
-OH = 11.10HC = N = 9.0Ar–H = 7.7–7.0
-OH = 11.14HC = N = 9.02Ar–H = 7.71–6.96The mass reduction in reaction time, number, and volume of solvent used in the microwave irradiation method while maintaining the purity not only improved the way of synthesizing HLa ligand but also minimized the cost and wastage in line with the Principle of Green Chemistry [12].


## 3.4. X-Ray Crystallography

Slow evaporation of ligand HLb in dichloromethane/ethanol mixture solvent gives needle-like crystal, which is suitable for X-ray crystallography analysis. The structure of HLb is illustrated in Figure5, and the crystal data are tabulated in Table 2.Figure 5
ORTEP view of ligand HLb. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50% ellipsoid probability.Table 2
Crystal data of HLb.
Empirical formula
C16 H16 N2 O4
Formula weight
300.31
Temperature
273(2) K
Wavelength
0.71073 Å
Crystal system
Monoclinic
Space group
P 21/c
Unit cell dimensions
a = 6.7171(9) Å
α = 90°
b = 15.947(2) Å
β = 91.201(4)°
c = 6.8061(9) Å
γ = 90°
Volume
728.88(17) Å3
Z
2
Density (calculated)
1.368 mg/m3
Absorption coefficient
0.100 mm−1
Crystal size
0.350 × 0.230 × 0.170 mm3
Theta range for data collection
3.033 to 28.356°
Reflections collected
21681
Independent reflections
1808 [R(int) = 0.0785]
Completeness to theta = 25.242°
99.8%
Refinement method
Full-matrix least-squares onF2
Data/restraints/parameters
1808/1/105
Goodness-of-fit onF2
1.182
FinalR indices (I > 2sigma(I))
R
1 = 0.0746, wR2 = 0.1275
R indices (all data)
R
1 = 0.1293, wR2 = 0.1459The ligand HLb possessed a similar structure as reported by Randell et al. [13], with substituted methoxy group on the fifth benzene carbon. The inversion center about the N1-N1A bond adopts a centrosymmetric E,E configuration with respect to C7=N1 and the torsion angle of N1A–N1–C7–C1 = 179.3(2)°, conforming the presence of benzylidene as well as the imine bond formation. The whole molecule is essentially planar with the exception of the C8 and C8A atom with the maximum deviation of 0.113(3)°. The intramolecular hydrogen bond between N1-H1⋯O1 and D-H⋯ A distance of 142(3) A forms a stable six-membered hydrogen bound ring.


## 3.5. Antibacterial Study

Both azine ligands, HLa and HLb, were screened for antibacterial activity by the disc diffusion method, and the zone of inhibition is measured in millimeters, as tabulated in Table3. A total of six bacterial strains were used to evaluate the biological properties of the ligands.Table 3
Relative diameter of the inhibition zone exhibited by the ligands HLa and HLb.
Strain
Diameter of inhibition (mm)
HLa
HLb
Gentamicin
B. cereus
—
8
23
B. subtilis
—
9
23
S. aureus
8
7
25
K. pneumoniae
8
8
16
P. aeruginosa
8
8
23
E. coli
11
7
18HLa is best used againstE. coli, while HLb works great resisting the growth of B. subtilis. Overall, ligand HLb has more resistance towards all six bacterial strains compared to HLa although it is considered weak when compared to standard antibiotic, gentamicin. The substituent effect might be the reason for the enhancement of the biological properties of HLb. The electron-donating group (EDG), methoxy (–CH3), donates electron to the π-system resulting a more nucleophilic π-system. The increases in nucleophilicity leads to the increases of lipophilicity of the compound as explained in Tweedy’s theory [14, 15]. The increased lipophilicity enhances the penetration of the compounds into the lipid membrane, thus enhancing its antimicrobial activities [16].


## 4. Conclusion

The usage of microware irradiation in synthesizing HLa and HLb resulted in the formation of azine ligand instead of thiocarbohydrazone. High energy from the microwave irradiation causes the breakage of the thione, C=S bond, enabling the amine to reattach to another amine terminal. As for the biological properties of the ligand, it was found that HLb possessed better resistance towards all six bacterial strains compared to HLa. This is due to the presence of the EDG substituent in HLb that enhanced the biological properties of the ligand.



---

*Source: 9546373-2019-05-13.xml*