# New Architecture towards Ultrathin CdTe Solar Cells for High Conversion Efficiency

Authors: A. Teyou Ngoupo; S. Ouédraogo; F. Zougmoré; J. M. B. Ndjaka
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Solar Cell Capacitance Simulator in 1 Dimension (SCAPS-1D) is used to investigate the possibility of realizing ultrathin CdTe based solar cells with high and stable conversion efficiency. In the first step, we modified the conventional cell structure by substituting the CdS window layer with a CdS:O film having a wide band gap ranging from 2.42 to 3.17 eV. Thereafter, we simulated the quantum efficiency, as well as the parameters ofJ-V characteristics, and showed how the thickness of CdS:O layer influences output parameters of Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Ni reference cell. High conversion efficiency of 17.30% has been found using CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12) and CdTe layers of thickness 15 nm and 4 μm, respectively. Secondly, we introduced a BSR layer between the absorber layer and back metal contact, which led to Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/BSR/Ni configuration. We found that a few nanometers (about 5 nm) of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer is sufficient to obtain high conversion efficiency. For BSR layer, different materials with large band gap, such as ZnTe, Cu2Te, and p+-CdTe, have been used in order to reduce minority carrier recombination at the back contact. When ZnTe is used, high conversion efficiency of 21.65% and better stability are obtained, compared to other BSR.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Technology of polycrystalline thin films has emerged during the last decades and has entered into direct competition with the path of multicrystalline silicon, which still dominates the market of photovoltaic. Solar cells based on polycrystalline thin films are very promising in order to achieve better efficiency/cost ratios than the other counterparts. Among the thin films cells, CdTe based solar cells are the most promising candidate for photovoltaic energy conversion because of the high potentiality to realize low cost, high efficiency, reliable, and stable solar cells [1]. CdTe is an II–VI compound semiconductor with a direct optical band gap of ~1.5 eV, which is nearly optimally matched to the solar spectrum for photovoltaic (PV) energy conversion. It also has a high absorption coefficient >5 × 105/cm, which means that ~99% of photons with energy greater than the band gap (E
g) can be absorbed within 2 μm of CdTe film [2]. The polycrystalline layers of CdTe solar cells can be synthesised using a variety of different low cost techniques such as Close-Space Sublimation (CSS), Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), Chemical Bath Deposition (CBD), or Sputtering [1]. However, the stability of CdTe solar cells is a complex problem which depends to a great degree on cell structure. The main stability issue for CdTe solar cells is the non-ohmic back contact and stability improvements have focused primarily on finding stable contacts without sacrificing efficiency [3]. For some years now, to improve the rear contact and reduce the recombination in the structure, a stable Back Surface Reflector (BSR) has been applied. The main role of this layer is to provide confinement for the photogenerated minority carriers and keep them within the reach of the p-n junction to be efficiently collected. This has to be accomplished without increasing the series resistance of device. Additionally, photon confinement capabilities are an interesting ancillary property for this layer [4].Nowadays, the highest reported efficiency of 19.6% by GE Global Research [5] is still below the theoretical efficiency which is about 29%. Thus, ultrathin heterojunction cell structure with wide band gap window layer and thinner absorber layer creates research interest. Thinning not only will save material, but will also reduce the loss of minority carriers, as well as production time and the energy needed to produce them [1].In this work, numerical simulations of a modified structure of the conventional CdS/CdTe solar cell [6] have been performed using the SCAPS-1D program. In a first step, we replaced the window layer CdS of the conventional cell by an oxygenated nanocrystalline cadmium sulfide (CdS:O), in order to avoid the diffusion of Te from CdTe to CdS, thus preventing the formation of the solid phase CdS
1
-
yTe
y at the CdS/CdTe interface. This CdS
1
-
yTe
y phase damages the short wavelength optical transmission of the window layer and has a poor spectral response in this region of wavelength [7]; this could lead to reducing of performance of solar cell. In the second step, we introduced a BSR layer between the absorber layer and back metal contact in order to reduce the possible recombination at the back contact.


## 2. Materials and Modeling

### 2.1. Numerical Modeling

Numerical models have become indispensable tools for the design of any kind of realizable solar cell. Numerical modeling of polycrystalline thin film solar cells is an important strategy to test the viability of proposed physical explanations and to predict the effect of physical changes on cell performance [6]. Given the complex nature of CdS/CdTe thin film polycrystalline solar cells, the need for numerical modeling is apparent. Numerical simulations give insight into the mechanism of structures, thereby enabling the design of new structures with better efficiency and performance [8]. The adopted strategies to improve the performance of CdS/CdTe thin film polycrystalline solar cells have been explored using SCAPS-1D (Solar cell Capacitance Simulator in One Dimension) code, developed by Burgelman et al. [9]. The main functional aspect of SCAPS-1D is to solve the fundamental equations of carrier’s transport, Poisson equation, and carrier continuity equations, in the semiconductors. SCAPS-1D does not perform calculations in the temporal domain but calculates the steady-state band diagram, recombination profile, and carrier transport in one dimension. Thus, the basic equations of semiconductors are given by [10](1)
∂
∂
x
ε
∂
Ψ
∂
x
=
-
q
ε
0
p
-
n
+
N
D
+
-
N
A
-
+
ρ
d
e
f
q
,
-
∂
J
n
∂
x
-
U
n
+
G
=
∂
n
∂
t
,
-
∂
J
p
∂
x
-
U
p
+
G
=
∂
p
∂
t
.Figure 1 illustrates the two modified cell structures for higher conversion efficiency, which have been used in the present study. The conventional CdS/CdTe cell structure can be seen in [6].Figure 1
Solar cells structures: (a) reference cell; (b) our proposed cell for higher performance.
(a)
(b)


### 2.2. Cell Structure and Material Parameters

In the design of a modified structure (Figure1(b)), four new layers have been introduced: the first one is zinc stannate (ZTO) layer, introduced between the front contact and window layer in order to reduce the leakage current due to pinholes, to achieve thinner window layer, and to increase its morphology. The second one is oxygenated nanocrystalline cadmium sulfide (CdS:O) which replaces the conventional CdS window layer. The oxygen atom present in CdS:O nanocrystalline films significantly suppresses the Te interdiffusion from CdTe to the CdS film and the formation of a CdS
1
-
yTe
y alloy which has a lower band gap and provides poor quantum efficiency in the short wavelength region [2]. The band gap of CdS:O film depends on the O2/Ar ratio in the film growth process; the band gap can increase from 2.42 eV to 3.17 eV with increasing O2/Ar ratio [11] as shown in Table 1. Weak thickness and large band gap of this layer increase the blue region response of the cell and reduce the surface recombination current. The third layer is a CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12) solid phase which is unintentionally and automatically developed in the Close-Space Sublimation (CSS) film growth process. The layer thickness depends on CSS growth time, which can be reduced in the real fabrication process [12], and the high temperature associated with the CSS. The presence of this solid phase may be important in such things as preventing shunts, maximizing the CdS-CdTe contact area and improving the CdS-CdTe interface [7]. Alloy band gap can be predicted using a simple quadratic equation [13]:(2)
E
g
,
alloy
x
=
1.7
x
2
+
E
g
,
CdS:O
-
E
g
,
CdTe
-
1.7
x
+
E
g
,
CdTe
.The last layer is the Back Surface Reflector (BSR). It is introduced between metal back contact and CdTe absorber layer, to reduce the possible recombination at the back contact and the effect of the rollover in the ultrathin CdTe solar cells. BSR, as ZnTe, Cu2Te, and p+-CdTe in this numerical simulation, has a wide band gap and it forms CdTe/BSR heterojunction with the absorber layer. This layer can contribute to increasing of V
O
C and could also contribute in the carrier enhancement by reflecting the carriers towards the main junction [14].Table 1
The band gap of CdS:O films with O2/Ar ratio.
O2/Ar (%)
Optical band gap (eV)
0
2.42
1
2.52
2
2.65
3
2.80
5
3.17All material parameters used in this work are listed in Table2; these values have been taken within the literature and some are the reasonable estimation. The variable material parameters regarding the structure can be the layer thickness, doping concentration, ratio of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x mixing, band gap, and so forth.Table 2
Material parameters used in the numerical analysis for the nano-CdS:O/CdTe cell.
Parameter
Material layer
n-SnO2
n-ZTO
n-CdS:O
p-C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12)
p-CdTe
ZnTe/Cu2Te/p+-CdTe
Thickness (μm)
0.1
0.2
0.01–0.1
0.0–0.3
0.6–2
0.1
Dielectric constant
9.0
9.0
10.0
9.4
9.4
14/10/10
Electron mobility,μ
n (cm2/Vs)
100
52
100
320
320
100/500/110
Hole mobility,μ
p (cm2/Vs)
25
3
25
40
40
10/100/70
Electron and hole concentration,n, p (cm−3)
1017
1019
1.1 × 1018
2 × 1014
1016/1016/1017
7.5 × 1019/1021/7.9 × 1019
Band gap,E
g (eV)
3.60
3.35
2.80
1.47
1.50
2.26/1.18/1.45
Density of states at conduction band,N
c (cm−3)
2.2 × 1018
2.1 × 1018
2.2 × 1018
7.9 × 1017
7.9 × 1017
7.8/7.8/7.9 (×1017)
Density of states at valance band,N
v (cm−3)
1.8 × 1019
1.5 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.6/1.6/1.8 (×1019)
Electron affinity,χ (eV)
4.55
4.50
4.50
4.26
4.26
3.65/4.20/4.28


## 2.1. Numerical Modeling

Numerical models have become indispensable tools for the design of any kind of realizable solar cell. Numerical modeling of polycrystalline thin film solar cells is an important strategy to test the viability of proposed physical explanations and to predict the effect of physical changes on cell performance [6]. Given the complex nature of CdS/CdTe thin film polycrystalline solar cells, the need for numerical modeling is apparent. Numerical simulations give insight into the mechanism of structures, thereby enabling the design of new structures with better efficiency and performance [8]. The adopted strategies to improve the performance of CdS/CdTe thin film polycrystalline solar cells have been explored using SCAPS-1D (Solar cell Capacitance Simulator in One Dimension) code, developed by Burgelman et al. [9]. The main functional aspect of SCAPS-1D is to solve the fundamental equations of carrier’s transport, Poisson equation, and carrier continuity equations, in the semiconductors. SCAPS-1D does not perform calculations in the temporal domain but calculates the steady-state band diagram, recombination profile, and carrier transport in one dimension. Thus, the basic equations of semiconductors are given by [10](1)
∂
∂
x
ε
∂
Ψ
∂
x
=
-
q
ε
0
p
-
n
+
N
D
+
-
N
A
-
+
ρ
d
e
f
q
,
-
∂
J
n
∂
x
-
U
n
+
G
=
∂
n
∂
t
,
-
∂
J
p
∂
x
-
U
p
+
G
=
∂
p
∂
t
.Figure 1 illustrates the two modified cell structures for higher conversion efficiency, which have been used in the present study. The conventional CdS/CdTe cell structure can be seen in [6].Figure 1
Solar cells structures: (a) reference cell; (b) our proposed cell for higher performance.
(a)
(b)


## 2.2. Cell Structure and Material Parameters

In the design of a modified structure (Figure1(b)), four new layers have been introduced: the first one is zinc stannate (ZTO) layer, introduced between the front contact and window layer in order to reduce the leakage current due to pinholes, to achieve thinner window layer, and to increase its morphology. The second one is oxygenated nanocrystalline cadmium sulfide (CdS:O) which replaces the conventional CdS window layer. The oxygen atom present in CdS:O nanocrystalline films significantly suppresses the Te interdiffusion from CdTe to the CdS film and the formation of a CdS
1
-
yTe
y alloy which has a lower band gap and provides poor quantum efficiency in the short wavelength region [2]. The band gap of CdS:O film depends on the O2/Ar ratio in the film growth process; the band gap can increase from 2.42 eV to 3.17 eV with increasing O2/Ar ratio [11] as shown in Table 1. Weak thickness and large band gap of this layer increase the blue region response of the cell and reduce the surface recombination current. The third layer is a CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12) solid phase which is unintentionally and automatically developed in the Close-Space Sublimation (CSS) film growth process. The layer thickness depends on CSS growth time, which can be reduced in the real fabrication process [12], and the high temperature associated with the CSS. The presence of this solid phase may be important in such things as preventing shunts, maximizing the CdS-CdTe contact area and improving the CdS-CdTe interface [7]. Alloy band gap can be predicted using a simple quadratic equation [13]:(2)
E
g
,
alloy
x
=
1.7
x
2
+
E
g
,
CdS:O
-
E
g
,
CdTe
-
1.7
x
+
E
g
,
CdTe
.The last layer is the Back Surface Reflector (BSR). It is introduced between metal back contact and CdTe absorber layer, to reduce the possible recombination at the back contact and the effect of the rollover in the ultrathin CdTe solar cells. BSR, as ZnTe, Cu2Te, and p+-CdTe in this numerical simulation, has a wide band gap and it forms CdTe/BSR heterojunction with the absorber layer. This layer can contribute to increasing of V
O
C and could also contribute in the carrier enhancement by reflecting the carriers towards the main junction [14].Table 1
The band gap of CdS:O films with O2/Ar ratio.
O2/Ar (%)
Optical band gap (eV)
0
2.42
1
2.52
2
2.65
3
2.80
5
3.17All material parameters used in this work are listed in Table2; these values have been taken within the literature and some are the reasonable estimation. The variable material parameters regarding the structure can be the layer thickness, doping concentration, ratio of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x mixing, band gap, and so forth.Table 2
Material parameters used in the numerical analysis for the nano-CdS:O/CdTe cell.
Parameter
Material layer
n-SnO2
n-ZTO
n-CdS:O
p-C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12)
p-CdTe
ZnTe/Cu2Te/p+-CdTe
Thickness (μm)
0.1
0.2
0.01–0.1
0.0–0.3
0.6–2
0.1
Dielectric constant
9.0
9.0
10.0
9.4
9.4
14/10/10
Electron mobility,μ
n (cm2/Vs)
100
52
100
320
320
100/500/110
Hole mobility,μ
p (cm2/Vs)
25
3
25
40
40
10/100/70
Electron and hole concentration,n, p (cm−3)
1017
1019
1.1 × 1018
2 × 1014
1016/1016/1017
7.5 × 1019/1021/7.9 × 1019
Band gap,E
g (eV)
3.60
3.35
2.80
1.47
1.50
2.26/1.18/1.45
Density of states at conduction band,N
c (cm−3)
2.2 × 1018
2.1 × 1018
2.2 × 1018
7.9 × 1017
7.9 × 1017
7.8/7.8/7.9 (×1017)
Density of states at valance band,N
v (cm−3)
1.8 × 1019
1.5 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.8 × 1019
1.6/1.6/1.8 (×1019)
Electron affinity,χ (eV)
4.55
4.50
4.50
4.26
4.26
3.65/4.20/4.28


## 3. Results and Discussion

SCAPS-1D simulations have been performed to find the appropriate and stable structure of nano-CdS:O/CdTe solar cell using a number of variable parameters related to the electrical and optical properties of nano-CdS:O and BSR layers, in order to improve the performances of the conventional CdS/CdTe solar cell described in [6].


### 3.1. Reference Cell Simulation

#### 3.1.1. Comparison with a Conventional Solar Cell

In this section, the results of calculations performed using the device cell structure of Figure1(a) as starting point are compared to simulations done with a conventional cell. Figure 2 shows a superposition of J
-
V curve of both cells. The resulting performance parameters of the open-circuit voltage (V
O
C), short-circuit current density (J
s
c), fill factor (FF), and efficiency are determined and are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Comparison of both cells.
Cell
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Conventional
0.871
24.132
76.14
16
Reference
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.3Figure 2
Comparison between the photocurrent density-voltage (J
-
V) curves for a conventional cell (blue line) and a reference cell (red line).The performance parameters of our reference cell are slightly higher than those of conventional cell (Table3). This result is attributed to the three basic layers that have been introduced, mainly to ZTO buffer layer, which has a high resistivity, avoids pinholes effect, and increases morphology of window layer, what reduces series resistance and increases fill factor. For the comparison, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses in our reference cell are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, and 25 nm. CdTe doping concentration adopted is 5.5
×
10
14 cm−3.As mentioned above, the main role of ZTO buffer layer, with high resistivity, is to achieve thinner window layer and increase its morphology, what can significantly improve the blue response of the solar cell.


#### 3.1.2. Effect of the Nano-CdS:O Layer Thickness

The dependency of cell performance on the nano-CdS:O layer thickness from 10 to 200 nm has been simulated, in order to achieve thinner window layer. CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), ZTO, and SnO2 layers thicknesses are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm in this case, all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.When the nano-CdS:O thickness was reduced to explore thinner nano-CdS:O layer, the absorption loss in the blue region due to thick CdS:O layer also reduced, which improved mainlyJ
s
c and cell conversion efficiency [1, 8]. The effect of the reduction of nano-CdS:O layer from 200 to 10 nm is shown in Figure 3. Below 500 nm of wavelength, quantum efficiency of cell is much more affected by increasing of the nano-CdS:O layer thickness (Figure 3(b)). Some photons cause the process of vibration of atoms around their equilibrium position. This phenomenon does not contribute to the photocurrent and raises consequently the losses in the structure of the solar cell. Therefore, it would lead to decrease in the photons which have reached the absorber layer and contribute to photovoltaic conversion. A decrease in the number of photons at the absorber layer would decrease the quantum efficiency of the solar cell [15].Figure 3
Effect of CdS:O thickness onJ
s
c, efficiency, and QE of solar cell.
(a)
(b)When the nano-CdS:O layer is thinner, photocurrent increases slightly and conversion efficiency also increases. In order to investigate ultrathin cell for high conversion, the thickness of nano-CdS:O layer has been set to 25 nm.


#### 3.1.3. Effect of the CdTe Layer Thickness

Theoretically, the minimum thickness required for CdTe film to absorb 99% of the incident photons with energy greater thanE
g is approximately 1-2 μm. Previously, almost all the high efficiency CdTe solar cells were fabricated with more than 5 μm thick CdTe absorber layer [1]. However, further numerical simulation was done to reduce the thickness of the cell, aiming to reduce the amount materials used, as well as time and cost production. Cell thickness reduction not only would be useful to reduce the material cost and time in the production process, but also could lead to better solar cell properties by reducing recombination in the bulk. However, control of the film growth and recrystallization due to postdeposition treatment is necessary to obtain thin films which are compact and free of pinholes [1]. In Figure 4, at the lower value of CdTe thickness, J
s
c decrease sharply because the minority carrier diffusion length is critically shorter but FF shows a little increased value, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material. These results are in a good agreement with those of the literature [8, 16]. Our result showed that, above 2 μm, the cell output parameters are no longer affected; they are almost constant. This result is obtained with layers thicknesses of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 set to 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.Figure 4
Effect of CdTe thickness onF
F, V
O
C, J
s
c, and efficiency of solar cell.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate high conversion efficiency with thin CdTe, the value 1.5μm of layer thickness has been chosen and, below this value, conversion efficiency of cell decreases rapidly. Having a thin CdTe layer, while maintaining higher conversion efficiency, is not possible for our reference cell. However, there are possibilities of increasing V
O
C, J
s
c, and FF below CdTe thickness of 1.5 μm, while having improved efficiency. In order to attain this goal, the reference structure has been modified by inserting the BSR [16] between absorber layer and metal back contact.


### 3.2. Proposed Ultrathin Structure for High Conversion

Numerical analysis with SCAPS-1D has been done with the proposed ultrathin cell structure (Figure1(b)), aiming to investigate the effect of different BSR material on performance of solar cell.


#### 3.2.1. BSR Layer

Numerical analysis has been carried out to determine the effect of different BSR material on performance of cell. The layers thicknesses of BSR, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 are set to 100 nm, 1.5 μm, 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remain constant. As mentioned above, BSR layer is considered to be beneficial to the performance of CdTe cells. A thin layer of BSR causes the depletion region of the Schottky barrier contact to be narrow, where majority holes carriers can tunnel through minimizing the loss. This layer may also add an additional absorption layer to the structure, which will increase the photogenerated carriers [17]. The BSR material has great influence in J
-
V characteristics of the cell, as shown in Figure 5. Table 4 shows that the introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever be the nature of the BSR material. Indeed, BSR causes the reflection of minority carriers towards the main junction and reduces their recombination at the back contact [16]; thus, both open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current can be increased.Table 4
Output parameters of different cells with BSR.
Different cell structures
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Ni
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.30
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Cu2Te/Ni
1.021
22.672
85.52
19.79
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/p+-CdTe/Ni
1.056
23.923
86.04
21.73
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni
1.072
25.860
77.89
21.59Figure 5
I
-
V curve of reference cell and modified cell.As can be seen in Figure5, the cell structure with BSR shows higher V
O
C than the cell without BSR. The larger band gap of BSR contributes to increasing of V
O
C as the absorber layer is thin (<2 μm). The cell with ZnTe shows higher V
O
C and J
s
c but poor FF; this might be attributed to the presence of a back electron barrier at the rear of the absorber which reduces the minority carrier recombination. All the BSR effectively reflect back the minority carriers; an appropriated barrier height denoted by Φ
e in the conduction band near the back surface, often referred to as an electron reflector barrier, is critical to reduce voltage-limiting recombination at the back surface [8, 18]. Due to this electron reflector barrier, cells with BSR have shown higher V
O
C as shown in Table 4. Using ZnTe as BSR shows more significance in term of improvement of V
O
C and J
s
c than Cu2Te and p+-CdTe. It seems that, with a modest electron reflector barrier (0.2 eV), the electrons are reflected back towards the front contact. A potential difficulty, however, is that any recombination at the CdTe-BSR interface will compromise the advantage of keeping electrons away from the metal interface [18]. Cell with ZnTe shows poor FF because of the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material [8, 16].The introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever the nature of the BSR material is. The use of p+-CdTe as BSR layer permits getting an efficiency of conversion of 21.73% for the modified cell.


#### 3.2.2. CdTe1−xSx Layer (x = 0.12)

In order to investigate the effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness on the output parameters of the modified cell for high conversion, the properties of the different layers are kept constant, while varying the thickness of this layer from 1 nm to 300 nm in this numerical simulation. As mentioned above, this thickness depends on Close-Space Sublimation (CSS) growth time process. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D with ZnTe as BSR are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x thickness on J
s
c, V
O
C, FF, and efficiency of modified solar cell.
(a)
(b)It can be observed that the solar cell output parameters are strongly dependent on CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness; but J
s
c is not much affected. The incorporation of S into CdTe layer influences the junction transport properties, by increasing absorbed photons and carrier collection in the long wavelengths of the spectrum which contribute to the photocurrent and reducing of interface state density in the CdS/CdTe interface for thin CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer. But, for a thick CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, efficiency shows a decreasing trend; this may be attributed to the recombination in this layer and at the CdS/CdTe interface. For 1 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, we obtain a highest efficiency of 21.72%. In order to take the fabrication challenges, the value of 10 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness was chosen with an efficiency of 21.65%.The improvement of efficiency of the modified cell structure with ZnTe as a BSR is mainly due to improvement ofV
O
C and FF, but again J
s
c is reduced slightly [12], when CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness is reduced.


#### 3.2.3. Electric Parameters of Ultrathin Cell Structure and Conventional Cell

To show that the new structure, with ZnTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses of 100 nm, 10 nm, and 25 nm, respectively, is more economic in raw material as mentioned in the introduction of this work, we are going to compare the evolution of the electric parameters of this structure to those of a conventional solar cell, when the CdTe layer thickness varies (Figure 7) and all others parameters of the cells remain constant.Figure 7
Comparison of electrical parameters (V
O
C, FF, J
s
c, and efficiency) of ultrathin structure and conventional solar cell as a function of CdTe absorber thickness.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It can be observed in Figure7 that the expected higher conversion efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is a result mainly of the higher open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current density, as the CdTe layer thickness is reduced. This result is due both to the back surface and to the built-in electric field in the CdTe layer, as a consequence of the back ZnTe layer in the former case [19]. For CdTe layer thickness which equals 1.5 μm, the gain of efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is around 6.72%. This gain is mainly attributed to the electrons reflected at the CdTe/ZnTe interface (due to the conduction-band discontinuity) and collected with a higher probability at the main junction. The poor FF (Figure 7(b)) of the ultrathin structure is due to the high resistive ZTO buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material. FF shows a little increased value, in the case of the conventional cell, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material.Finally, the ultrathin cell is more economic in raw material (reduction of solar cell cost) and has the higher conversion efficiency than the conventional solar cell, but poor FF due to the high resistivity of buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the ZnTe BSR layer.


#### 3.2.4. Stability of Cell without and with BSR

The stability of the ultrathin CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe proposed cell at higher operating temperature has been investigated. In real cases, operating temperature plays a very important role which affects the performance and stability of the cells. At higher operating temperature, cell layers parameters such as the effective density of states, absorption coefficients, electron and hole mobility, electron and hole thermal velocity, carrier concentrations, and band gaps of the materials are affected [1]. An investigation was conducted using SCAPS-1D at operating temperature which ranged from 25°C to 100°C for the proposed cells. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D simulation are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Effect of operating temperature on normalized efficiency of reference and modified cell structures.The effect of temperature can be measured by a term named temperature coefficient (TC), which can be defined as the change of power of solar cell for increase or decrease of operating temperature per degree centigrade [4]. This TC indicates the degree of stability of the cell at higher operating temperature or in stressed conditions. It is evident from Figure 8 that the conversion efficiency linearly decreases with the increase of operating temperature. The temperature coefficient of reference cell is found to be −0.27%/°C. Cells with p+-CdTe and Cu2Te BSR layers slightly follow the same trends with a temperature coefficient of −0.19%/°C and −0.24%/°C, respectively. The cell with ZnTe BSR shows different trend than the previous cells and its efficiency remains almost unchanged when the operating temperature is in the range from 25°C to 55°C and then it decreases with a TC of −0.15%/°C. Therefore, the cell with ZnTe BSR layer shows a better stability against temperature than others modified cells.A modified cell with higher open-circuit voltage and band gap is less affected by temperature; it is the case of the Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni configuration which presents a better stability against temperature.


## 3.1. Reference Cell Simulation

### 3.1.1. Comparison with a Conventional Solar Cell

In this section, the results of calculations performed using the device cell structure of Figure1(a) as starting point are compared to simulations done with a conventional cell. Figure 2 shows a superposition of J
-
V curve of both cells. The resulting performance parameters of the open-circuit voltage (V
O
C), short-circuit current density (J
s
c), fill factor (FF), and efficiency are determined and are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Comparison of both cells.
Cell
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Conventional
0.871
24.132
76.14
16
Reference
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.3Figure 2
Comparison between the photocurrent density-voltage (J
-
V) curves for a conventional cell (blue line) and a reference cell (red line).The performance parameters of our reference cell are slightly higher than those of conventional cell (Table3). This result is attributed to the three basic layers that have been introduced, mainly to ZTO buffer layer, which has a high resistivity, avoids pinholes effect, and increases morphology of window layer, what reduces series resistance and increases fill factor. For the comparison, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses in our reference cell are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, and 25 nm. CdTe doping concentration adopted is 5.5
×
10
14 cm−3.As mentioned above, the main role of ZTO buffer layer, with high resistivity, is to achieve thinner window layer and increase its morphology, what can significantly improve the blue response of the solar cell.


### 3.1.2. Effect of the Nano-CdS:O Layer Thickness

The dependency of cell performance on the nano-CdS:O layer thickness from 10 to 200 nm has been simulated, in order to achieve thinner window layer. CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), ZTO, and SnO2 layers thicknesses are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm in this case, all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.When the nano-CdS:O thickness was reduced to explore thinner nano-CdS:O layer, the absorption loss in the blue region due to thick CdS:O layer also reduced, which improved mainlyJ
s
c and cell conversion efficiency [1, 8]. The effect of the reduction of nano-CdS:O layer from 200 to 10 nm is shown in Figure 3. Below 500 nm of wavelength, quantum efficiency of cell is much more affected by increasing of the nano-CdS:O layer thickness (Figure 3(b)). Some photons cause the process of vibration of atoms around their equilibrium position. This phenomenon does not contribute to the photocurrent and raises consequently the losses in the structure of the solar cell. Therefore, it would lead to decrease in the photons which have reached the absorber layer and contribute to photovoltaic conversion. A decrease in the number of photons at the absorber layer would decrease the quantum efficiency of the solar cell [15].Figure 3
Effect of CdS:O thickness onJ
s
c, efficiency, and QE of solar cell.
(a)
(b)When the nano-CdS:O layer is thinner, photocurrent increases slightly and conversion efficiency also increases. In order to investigate ultrathin cell for high conversion, the thickness of nano-CdS:O layer has been set to 25 nm.


### 3.1.3. Effect of the CdTe Layer Thickness

Theoretically, the minimum thickness required for CdTe film to absorb 99% of the incident photons with energy greater thanE
g is approximately 1-2 μm. Previously, almost all the high efficiency CdTe solar cells were fabricated with more than 5 μm thick CdTe absorber layer [1]. However, further numerical simulation was done to reduce the thickness of the cell, aiming to reduce the amount materials used, as well as time and cost production. Cell thickness reduction not only would be useful to reduce the material cost and time in the production process, but also could lead to better solar cell properties by reducing recombination in the bulk. However, control of the film growth and recrystallization due to postdeposition treatment is necessary to obtain thin films which are compact and free of pinholes [1]. In Figure 4, at the lower value of CdTe thickness, J
s
c decrease sharply because the minority carrier diffusion length is critically shorter but FF shows a little increased value, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material. These results are in a good agreement with those of the literature [8, 16]. Our result showed that, above 2 μm, the cell output parameters are no longer affected; they are almost constant. This result is obtained with layers thicknesses of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 set to 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.Figure 4
Effect of CdTe thickness onF
F, V
O
C, J
s
c, and efficiency of solar cell.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate high conversion efficiency with thin CdTe, the value 1.5μm of layer thickness has been chosen and, below this value, conversion efficiency of cell decreases rapidly. Having a thin CdTe layer, while maintaining higher conversion efficiency, is not possible for our reference cell. However, there are possibilities of increasing V
O
C, J
s
c, and FF below CdTe thickness of 1.5 μm, while having improved efficiency. In order to attain this goal, the reference structure has been modified by inserting the BSR [16] between absorber layer and metal back contact.


## 3.1.1. Comparison with a Conventional Solar Cell

In this section, the results of calculations performed using the device cell structure of Figure1(a) as starting point are compared to simulations done with a conventional cell. Figure 2 shows a superposition of J
-
V curve of both cells. The resulting performance parameters of the open-circuit voltage (V
O
C), short-circuit current density (J
s
c), fill factor (FF), and efficiency are determined and are shown in Table 3.Table 3
Comparison of both cells.
Cell
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Conventional
0.871
24.132
76.14
16
Reference
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.3Figure 2
Comparison between the photocurrent density-voltage (J
-
V) curves for a conventional cell (blue line) and a reference cell (red line).The performance parameters of our reference cell are slightly higher than those of conventional cell (Table3). This result is attributed to the three basic layers that have been introduced, mainly to ZTO buffer layer, which has a high resistivity, avoids pinholes effect, and increases morphology of window layer, what reduces series resistance and increases fill factor. For the comparison, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses in our reference cell are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, and 25 nm. CdTe doping concentration adopted is 5.5
×
10
14 cm−3.As mentioned above, the main role of ZTO buffer layer, with high resistivity, is to achieve thinner window layer and increase its morphology, what can significantly improve the blue response of the solar cell.


## 3.1.2. Effect of the Nano-CdS:O Layer Thickness

The dependency of cell performance on the nano-CdS:O layer thickness from 10 to 200 nm has been simulated, in order to achieve thinner window layer. CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), ZTO, and SnO2 layers thicknesses are, respectively, 4 μm, 15 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm in this case, all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.When the nano-CdS:O thickness was reduced to explore thinner nano-CdS:O layer, the absorption loss in the blue region due to thick CdS:O layer also reduced, which improved mainlyJ
s
c and cell conversion efficiency [1, 8]. The effect of the reduction of nano-CdS:O layer from 200 to 10 nm is shown in Figure 3. Below 500 nm of wavelength, quantum efficiency of cell is much more affected by increasing of the nano-CdS:O layer thickness (Figure 3(b)). Some photons cause the process of vibration of atoms around their equilibrium position. This phenomenon does not contribute to the photocurrent and raises consequently the losses in the structure of the solar cell. Therefore, it would lead to decrease in the photons which have reached the absorber layer and contribute to photovoltaic conversion. A decrease in the number of photons at the absorber layer would decrease the quantum efficiency of the solar cell [15].Figure 3
Effect of CdS:O thickness onJ
s
c, efficiency, and QE of solar cell.
(a)
(b)When the nano-CdS:O layer is thinner, photocurrent increases slightly and conversion efficiency also increases. In order to investigate ultrathin cell for high conversion, the thickness of nano-CdS:O layer has been set to 25 nm.


## 3.1.3. Effect of the CdTe Layer Thickness

Theoretically, the minimum thickness required for CdTe film to absorb 99% of the incident photons with energy greater thanE
g is approximately 1-2 μm. Previously, almost all the high efficiency CdTe solar cells were fabricated with more than 5 μm thick CdTe absorber layer [1]. However, further numerical simulation was done to reduce the thickness of the cell, aiming to reduce the amount materials used, as well as time and cost production. Cell thickness reduction not only would be useful to reduce the material cost and time in the production process, but also could lead to better solar cell properties by reducing recombination in the bulk. However, control of the film growth and recrystallization due to postdeposition treatment is necessary to obtain thin films which are compact and free of pinholes [1]. In Figure 4, at the lower value of CdTe thickness, J
s
c decrease sharply because the minority carrier diffusion length is critically shorter but FF shows a little increased value, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material. These results are in a good agreement with those of the literature [8, 16]. Our result showed that, above 2 μm, the cell output parameters are no longer affected; they are almost constant. This result is obtained with layers thicknesses of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 set to 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remaining constant.Figure 4
Effect of CdTe thickness onF
F, V
O
C, J
s
c, and efficiency of solar cell.
(a)
(b)In order to investigate high conversion efficiency with thin CdTe, the value 1.5μm of layer thickness has been chosen and, below this value, conversion efficiency of cell decreases rapidly. Having a thin CdTe layer, while maintaining higher conversion efficiency, is not possible for our reference cell. However, there are possibilities of increasing V
O
C, J
s
c, and FF below CdTe thickness of 1.5 μm, while having improved efficiency. In order to attain this goal, the reference structure has been modified by inserting the BSR [16] between absorber layer and metal back contact.


## 3.2. Proposed Ultrathin Structure for High Conversion

Numerical analysis with SCAPS-1D has been done with the proposed ultrathin cell structure (Figure1(b)), aiming to investigate the effect of different BSR material on performance of solar cell.


### 3.2.1. BSR Layer

Numerical analysis has been carried out to determine the effect of different BSR material on performance of cell. The layers thicknesses of BSR, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 are set to 100 nm, 1.5 μm, 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remain constant. As mentioned above, BSR layer is considered to be beneficial to the performance of CdTe cells. A thin layer of BSR causes the depletion region of the Schottky barrier contact to be narrow, where majority holes carriers can tunnel through minimizing the loss. This layer may also add an additional absorption layer to the structure, which will increase the photogenerated carriers [17]. The BSR material has great influence in J
-
V characteristics of the cell, as shown in Figure 5. Table 4 shows that the introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever be the nature of the BSR material. Indeed, BSR causes the reflection of minority carriers towards the main junction and reduces their recombination at the back contact [16]; thus, both open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current can be increased.Table 4
Output parameters of different cells with BSR.
Different cell structures
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Ni
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.30
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Cu2Te/Ni
1.021
22.672
85.52
19.79
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/p+-CdTe/Ni
1.056
23.923
86.04
21.73
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni
1.072
25.860
77.89
21.59Figure 5
I
-
V curve of reference cell and modified cell.As can be seen in Figure5, the cell structure with BSR shows higher V
O
C than the cell without BSR. The larger band gap of BSR contributes to increasing of V
O
C as the absorber layer is thin (<2 μm). The cell with ZnTe shows higher V
O
C and J
s
c but poor FF; this might be attributed to the presence of a back electron barrier at the rear of the absorber which reduces the minority carrier recombination. All the BSR effectively reflect back the minority carriers; an appropriated barrier height denoted by Φ
e in the conduction band near the back surface, often referred to as an electron reflector barrier, is critical to reduce voltage-limiting recombination at the back surface [8, 18]. Due to this electron reflector barrier, cells with BSR have shown higher V
O
C as shown in Table 4. Using ZnTe as BSR shows more significance in term of improvement of V
O
C and J
s
c than Cu2Te and p+-CdTe. It seems that, with a modest electron reflector barrier (0.2 eV), the electrons are reflected back towards the front contact. A potential difficulty, however, is that any recombination at the CdTe-BSR interface will compromise the advantage of keeping electrons away from the metal interface [18]. Cell with ZnTe shows poor FF because of the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material [8, 16].The introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever the nature of the BSR material is. The use of p+-CdTe as BSR layer permits getting an efficiency of conversion of 21.73% for the modified cell.


### 3.2.2. CdTe1−xSx Layer (x = 0.12)

In order to investigate the effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness on the output parameters of the modified cell for high conversion, the properties of the different layers are kept constant, while varying the thickness of this layer from 1 nm to 300 nm in this numerical simulation. As mentioned above, this thickness depends on Close-Space Sublimation (CSS) growth time process. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D with ZnTe as BSR are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x thickness on J
s
c, V
O
C, FF, and efficiency of modified solar cell.
(a)
(b)It can be observed that the solar cell output parameters are strongly dependent on CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness; but J
s
c is not much affected. The incorporation of S into CdTe layer influences the junction transport properties, by increasing absorbed photons and carrier collection in the long wavelengths of the spectrum which contribute to the photocurrent and reducing of interface state density in the CdS/CdTe interface for thin CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer. But, for a thick CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, efficiency shows a decreasing trend; this may be attributed to the recombination in this layer and at the CdS/CdTe interface. For 1 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, we obtain a highest efficiency of 21.72%. In order to take the fabrication challenges, the value of 10 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness was chosen with an efficiency of 21.65%.The improvement of efficiency of the modified cell structure with ZnTe as a BSR is mainly due to improvement ofV
O
C and FF, but again J
s
c is reduced slightly [12], when CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness is reduced.


### 3.2.3. Electric Parameters of Ultrathin Cell Structure and Conventional Cell

To show that the new structure, with ZnTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses of 100 nm, 10 nm, and 25 nm, respectively, is more economic in raw material as mentioned in the introduction of this work, we are going to compare the evolution of the electric parameters of this structure to those of a conventional solar cell, when the CdTe layer thickness varies (Figure 7) and all others parameters of the cells remain constant.Figure 7
Comparison of electrical parameters (V
O
C, FF, J
s
c, and efficiency) of ultrathin structure and conventional solar cell as a function of CdTe absorber thickness.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It can be observed in Figure7 that the expected higher conversion efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is a result mainly of the higher open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current density, as the CdTe layer thickness is reduced. This result is due both to the back surface and to the built-in electric field in the CdTe layer, as a consequence of the back ZnTe layer in the former case [19]. For CdTe layer thickness which equals 1.5 μm, the gain of efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is around 6.72%. This gain is mainly attributed to the electrons reflected at the CdTe/ZnTe interface (due to the conduction-band discontinuity) and collected with a higher probability at the main junction. The poor FF (Figure 7(b)) of the ultrathin structure is due to the high resistive ZTO buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material. FF shows a little increased value, in the case of the conventional cell, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material.Finally, the ultrathin cell is more economic in raw material (reduction of solar cell cost) and has the higher conversion efficiency than the conventional solar cell, but poor FF due to the high resistivity of buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the ZnTe BSR layer.


### 3.2.4. Stability of Cell without and with BSR

The stability of the ultrathin CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe proposed cell at higher operating temperature has been investigated. In real cases, operating temperature plays a very important role which affects the performance and stability of the cells. At higher operating temperature, cell layers parameters such as the effective density of states, absorption coefficients, electron and hole mobility, electron and hole thermal velocity, carrier concentrations, and band gaps of the materials are affected [1]. An investigation was conducted using SCAPS-1D at operating temperature which ranged from 25°C to 100°C for the proposed cells. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D simulation are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Effect of operating temperature on normalized efficiency of reference and modified cell structures.The effect of temperature can be measured by a term named temperature coefficient (TC), which can be defined as the change of power of solar cell for increase or decrease of operating temperature per degree centigrade [4]. This TC indicates the degree of stability of the cell at higher operating temperature or in stressed conditions. It is evident from Figure 8 that the conversion efficiency linearly decreases with the increase of operating temperature. The temperature coefficient of reference cell is found to be −0.27%/°C. Cells with p+-CdTe and Cu2Te BSR layers slightly follow the same trends with a temperature coefficient of −0.19%/°C and −0.24%/°C, respectively. The cell with ZnTe BSR shows different trend than the previous cells and its efficiency remains almost unchanged when the operating temperature is in the range from 25°C to 55°C and then it decreases with a TC of −0.15%/°C. Therefore, the cell with ZnTe BSR layer shows a better stability against temperature than others modified cells.A modified cell with higher open-circuit voltage and band gap is less affected by temperature; it is the case of the Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni configuration which presents a better stability against temperature.


## 3.2.1. BSR Layer

Numerical analysis has been carried out to determine the effect of different BSR material on performance of cell. The layers thicknesses of BSR, CdTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), CdS:O, ZTO, and SnO2 are set to 100 nm, 1.5 μm, 15 nm, 25 nm, 200 nm, and 100 nm, respectively, and all others parameters of the cell remain constant. As mentioned above, BSR layer is considered to be beneficial to the performance of CdTe cells. A thin layer of BSR causes the depletion region of the Schottky barrier contact to be narrow, where majority holes carriers can tunnel through minimizing the loss. This layer may also add an additional absorption layer to the structure, which will increase the photogenerated carriers [17]. The BSR material has great influence in J
-
V characteristics of the cell, as shown in Figure 5. Table 4 shows that the introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever be the nature of the BSR material. Indeed, BSR causes the reflection of minority carriers towards the main junction and reduces their recombination at the back contact [16]; thus, both open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current can be increased.Table 4
Output parameters of different cells with BSR.
Different cell structures
V
O
C (V)
J
s
c (mA/cm2)
FF (%)
Eff. (%)
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Ni
0.883
24.216
80.91
17.30
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Cu2Te/Ni
1.021
22.672
85.52
19.79
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/p+-CdTe/Ni
1.056
23.923
86.04
21.73
Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/C
d
T
e
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni
1.072
25.860
77.89
21.59Figure 5
I
-
V curve of reference cell and modified cell.As can be seen in Figure5, the cell structure with BSR shows higher V
O
C than the cell without BSR. The larger band gap of BSR contributes to increasing of V
O
C as the absorber layer is thin (<2 μm). The cell with ZnTe shows higher V
O
C and J
s
c but poor FF; this might be attributed to the presence of a back electron barrier at the rear of the absorber which reduces the minority carrier recombination. All the BSR effectively reflect back the minority carriers; an appropriated barrier height denoted by Φ
e in the conduction band near the back surface, often referred to as an electron reflector barrier, is critical to reduce voltage-limiting recombination at the back surface [8, 18]. Due to this electron reflector barrier, cells with BSR have shown higher V
O
C as shown in Table 4. Using ZnTe as BSR shows more significance in term of improvement of V
O
C and J
s
c than Cu2Te and p+-CdTe. It seems that, with a modest electron reflector barrier (0.2 eV), the electrons are reflected back towards the front contact. A potential difficulty, however, is that any recombination at the CdTe-BSR interface will compromise the advantage of keeping electrons away from the metal interface [18]. Cell with ZnTe shows poor FF because of the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material [8, 16].The introduction of BSR layer leads to better performance than reference cell, whatever the nature of the BSR material is. The use of p+-CdTe as BSR layer permits getting an efficiency of conversion of 21.73% for the modified cell.


## 3.2.2. CdTe1−xSx Layer (x = 0.12)

In order to investigate the effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness on the output parameters of the modified cell for high conversion, the properties of the different layers are kept constant, while varying the thickness of this layer from 1 nm to 300 nm in this numerical simulation. As mentioned above, this thickness depends on Close-Space Sublimation (CSS) growth time process. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D with ZnTe as BSR are shown in Figure 6.Figure 6
Effect of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x thickness on J
s
c, V
O
C, FF, and efficiency of modified solar cell.
(a)
(b)It can be observed that the solar cell output parameters are strongly dependent on CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness; but J
s
c is not much affected. The incorporation of S into CdTe layer influences the junction transport properties, by increasing absorbed photons and carrier collection in the long wavelengths of the spectrum which contribute to the photocurrent and reducing of interface state density in the CdS/CdTe interface for thin CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer. But, for a thick CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, efficiency shows a decreasing trend; this may be attributed to the recombination in this layer and at the CdS/CdTe interface. For 1 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer, we obtain a highest efficiency of 21.72%. In order to take the fabrication challenges, the value of 10 nm of the CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness was chosen with an efficiency of 21.65%.The improvement of efficiency of the modified cell structure with ZnTe as a BSR is mainly due to improvement ofV
O
C and FF, but again J
s
c is reduced slightly [12], when CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness is reduced.


## 3.2.3. Electric Parameters of Ultrathin Cell Structure and Conventional Cell

To show that the new structure, with ZnTe, CdTe
1
-
x
S
x (x
=
0.12), and nano-CdS:O layers thicknesses of 100 nm, 10 nm, and 25 nm, respectively, is more economic in raw material as mentioned in the introduction of this work, we are going to compare the evolution of the electric parameters of this structure to those of a conventional solar cell, when the CdTe layer thickness varies (Figure 7) and all others parameters of the cells remain constant.Figure 7
Comparison of electrical parameters (V
O
C, FF, J
s
c, and efficiency) of ultrathin structure and conventional solar cell as a function of CdTe absorber thickness.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)It can be observed in Figure7 that the expected higher conversion efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is a result mainly of the higher open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current density, as the CdTe layer thickness is reduced. This result is due both to the back surface and to the built-in electric field in the CdTe layer, as a consequence of the back ZnTe layer in the former case [19]. For CdTe layer thickness which equals 1.5 μm, the gain of efficiency for the ultrathin structure, as compared to the conventional solar cell, is around 6.72%. This gain is mainly attributed to the electrons reflected at the CdTe/ZnTe interface (due to the conduction-band discontinuity) and collected with a higher probability at the main junction. The poor FF (Figure 7(b)) of the ultrathin structure is due to the high resistive ZTO buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the higher band gap and lower dielectric property of the ZnTe material. FF shows a little increased value, in the case of the conventional cell, due to the reduction of bulk resistance for CdTe material.Finally, the ultrathin cell is more economic in raw material (reduction of solar cell cost) and has the higher conversion efficiency than the conventional solar cell, but poor FF due to the high resistivity of buffer layer and the higher series resistance added by the bulk resistance of the ZnTe BSR layer.


## 3.2.4. Stability of Cell without and with BSR

The stability of the ultrathin CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe proposed cell at higher operating temperature has been investigated. In real cases, operating temperature plays a very important role which affects the performance and stability of the cells. At higher operating temperature, cell layers parameters such as the effective density of states, absorption coefficients, electron and hole mobility, electron and hole thermal velocity, carrier concentrations, and band gaps of the materials are affected [1]. An investigation was conducted using SCAPS-1D at operating temperature which ranged from 25°C to 100°C for the proposed cells. The results obtained from SCAPS-1D simulation are shown in Figure 8.Figure 8
Effect of operating temperature on normalized efficiency of reference and modified cell structures.The effect of temperature can be measured by a term named temperature coefficient (TC), which can be defined as the change of power of solar cell for increase or decrease of operating temperature per degree centigrade [4]. This TC indicates the degree of stability of the cell at higher operating temperature or in stressed conditions. It is evident from Figure 8 that the conversion efficiency linearly decreases with the increase of operating temperature. The temperature coefficient of reference cell is found to be −0.27%/°C. Cells with p+-CdTe and Cu2Te BSR layers slightly follow the same trends with a temperature coefficient of −0.19%/°C and −0.24%/°C, respectively. The cell with ZnTe BSR shows different trend than the previous cells and its efficiency remains almost unchanged when the operating temperature is in the range from 25°C to 55°C and then it decreases with a TC of −0.15%/°C. Therefore, the cell with ZnTe BSR layer shows a better stability against temperature than others modified cells.A modified cell with higher open-circuit voltage and band gap is less affected by temperature; it is the case of the Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/ZnTe/Ni configuration which presents a better stability against temperature.


## 4. Conclusion

Numerical analyses of CdTe solar cells have been performed in order to examine the potential improvement. Four different structures have been analyzed by using SCAPS-1D package, in order to minimize some issues related to conventional SnO2/CdS/CdTe cells. The basic issue here was to determine the effects of nano-CdS:O window and BSR layers on the output parameters of CdTe solar cell. Due to the high band gap and suppression of the Te interdiffusion from CdTe to CdS film, that is, the formation of CdS
1
-
yTe
y alloy at the p-n junction, incorporating nano-CdS:O as a window layer into the conventional CdTe solar cell improves cell performance compared to the standard CdS window layer. The band gap of nano-CdS:O layer increases with an increase of oxygen content and decrease of grain size. The presence of CdTe
1
-
x
S
x solid phase at the interface of p-n junction which reduces interface state density is also beneficial to the solar cell and extends spectral response to higher wavelength. An efficiency of 17.30% (V
O
C
=
0.883 V, J
s
c
=
24.216 mA/cm2, and F
F
=
80.91
%) was obtained from numerical analysis of reference cell (Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/Ni). Moreover, the overall performance of cell was affected by incorporating different BSR layers. This new configuration (Glass/SnO2/ZTO/CdS:O/CdTe
1
-
x
S
x/CdTe/BSR/Ni) avoids the effect of such recombination at the back contact, rollover, by producing mirror for minority carriers and by reducing the Schottky barrier height. In this configuration, reducing CdTe
1
-
x
S
x layer thickness to a few nanometers increases conversion efficiency of the cell. A modified cell with higher open-circuit voltage and band gap is less affected by temperature. A cell with ZnTe as BSR layer present a better stability in the high operating temperature with a temperature coefficient of −0.15%/°C. ZnTe BSR layer also presents poor FF; this might be attributed to the 0.61 eV magnitude of the CdTe/ZnTe conduction-band offset (Δ
E
C). Cell with Cu2Te BSR layer presents lower J
s
c because it has a spike on the valence band which produces high series resistance for majority carriers of the cell. On the other hand, in the case of p+-CdTe BSR layer, the absence of this spike and the weak magnitude of the CdTe/p+-CdTe conduction-band offset (Δ
E
C) increase the short circuit current slightly.



---

*Source: 961812-2015-10-05.xml*