# Floristic Composition, Vegetation Structure, and Regeneration Status of Woody Plant Species of Oda Forest of Humbo Carbon Project, Wolaita, Ethiopia

Authors: Markos Kuma; Simon Shibru
Journal: Journal of Botany
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

Our current study was conducted in Oda forest to explore floristic composition, vegetation structure, and regeneration of woody species in a newly established Humbo Carbon Project. In the project, the above information for sufficient conservation and management of the forest is not well documented. Data were collected in October and December 2014. Thirty-two quadrats (20 m × 20 m) lying 100 m far apart were used for shrub and tree data. In each major plot, subplots (1 m2) were established at the center and corner for seedlings and saplings data. Altitude, slope, and aspect were measured using GPS and clinometers. DBH, basal area, and IVI were used for vegetation structure. Among 62 species confined in 32 families and 54 genera, Dodonaea angustifolia and Combretum molle were the densest and the most dominant and frequent species with higher IVI. Altitude and slope had significant effect (p<0.0001) on basal area and dominance. Bell and inverted J shaped patterns of selected woody species were identified. The seedling, sapling, and matured tree had 2.3%, 23.7%, and 74% density ha−1 of individuals, respectively. Generally, the study confirmed that very few species had dominance and abundance, influence of altitude and slope on species distribution, and fair regeneration of the forest.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Diverse physiographic, altitudinal, climatic, and edaphic difference enables Ethiopia to have various types of vegetation ranging from alpine to desert plant communities [1] which provide economical, sociocultural, and environmental benefits. Many studies confirmed that forests have an important role in maintaining the productivity of the environment; trees provide food for animals, serve as a standing cover to protect the land from wind and water erosion, stabilizing the water cycle, facilitate the process of evaporation, and keep the soil porous; they are also used for construction as well as for tools, furniture, fuel, medicine, grass, and herbage and for forage and provide edible fruits. They serve to absorb carbon dioxide to reduce global warming, give off oxygen, and renew the atmosphere. Plants also serve as a source of income by attracting tourists, serve as recreational facilities, prevent lakes and dams from silting, and clean, regulate, and distribute water resources [1–6]. Hence, forests sequester and store more carbon than any terrestrial ecosystem; that is, they store more than 80% of all terrestrial above ground carbon and more than 70% of all soil organic carbon [7, 8]. To do so stable climate is crucial but the climate of Ethiopia has been changing due to global and local effects of vegetation degradation [4, 9]. In Ethiopia different factors like deforestation, overharvesting, and permanent conversion to other forms of land use are leading to shrinkage of forest resources. In addition to anthropogenic activities, forest can be affected by different environmental factors such as altitude, slope, and aspect by affecting the patterns of tree species distribution [10, 11].The forests of Humbo Woreda have been cleared only within the last thirty to fifty years as the demand for energy, construction wood, food, fodder, and feed has increased as a result of the increase both in human and in livestock population [12]. The main causes of deforestation and forest degradation at Humbo are tree cutting for wood fuel and construction materials production for sale especially to compensate food shortage created by erratic and scarce rainfall in the area over a long period of time. Oda forest was one of the forests of Humbo Woreda victimized by these anthropogenic activities as well as environmental factors. Awareness and knowledge on sustainable use and management were very much less even though the Humbo Carbon Project forests like Oda forest provide ecological services and socioeconomic values to local communities. Therefore, Humbo Community-Based Forest Management Project was established with the aim of sequestering CO2 through regeneration of native forest utilizing the farmer managed natural regeneration technique [13].The Humbo Community-Based Natural Regeneration Project forests act as a carbon “sink” to mitigate climate change while at the same time building environmental, social, and economic resilience for future climate change impacts. Over 90 percent of the Humbo project area is being reforested from the stumps of previously cut down (but still living) trees. To date, 2,728 hectares of degraded forest that was being continually exploited for wood, charcoal, and fodder extraction has been protected and is now being restored and sustainably managed [14]. Of that, 340.04 hectares is covered by Oda forest.The diversity, regeneration status, floristic composition, and vegetation structure are crucial elements to clearly visualize the anthropogenic activities as well as environmental factors affecting the vegetation of an area. Hence, for forest management accurate data on forest resources is considered to be an essential requirement [15], but as a result of being a newly established Carbon Project such a kind of information is not well documented in Oda forest. The lack of such basic information is one of the serious problems that hamper sufficient conservation and management of the forest. Therefore, this study intended to solve such a basic problem hindering observation of the next phenomenon.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Description of the Study Area

This study was carried out in Oda forest which is 25 km away from Humbo Tebela, the town of the Humbo district, which is located 420 km away from Addis Ababa. The forest is found in SNNPR, Wolaita zone, Humbo Woreda, Hobicha Bongota kebele (6°44′ and 37°52′N; 37°53′ and 38°00′E), Figure1. It lies within the midland relatively low agroecological zone at altitude ranges from 1625 to 1929 masl and the vegetation can be classified as the dry woodland forest type. It had been covered by dense vegetation of broad-leaved vegetation types and montane forests before they were cleared around fifty years ago [12].Figure 1
Map of study area.


### 2.2. Data Collection

The data collection was conducted from October to December 2014. A total of 32 quadrats (20 m × 20 m) lying far apart at 100 m were used for shrub and tree data based on aspect of the vegetation. In each major plot, subplots (1 m2) were established at the center and corner for seedlings and saplings data. All woody species with DBH ≥ 2.5 cm were recorded and their growth habits described. Individuals having DBH < 2.5 cm and height ≤ 0.6 m were counted as seedling whereas individuals with 2.5 cm ≤ DBH ≤ 15 cm and 0.61 ≤ height ≤ 3 m were counted as sapling. The DBH was measured at 1.3 m from the ground. Altitude, slope, and aspect were measured using GPS and clinometers. Species not identified on spot were identified using published volumes of the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea and ETH [16–20].


### 2.3. Data Analysis

Density, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), frequency, dominance, basal area, and IVI were used for description of vegetation structure. Bar graphs were developed using the DBH versus density of individuals for four arbitrary diameter classes (1 ≤ 5 cm, 2 = 5.1–10 cm, 3 = 10.1–15 cm, and 4 ≥ 15 cm) of the forest as well as the selected dominant species. The structural parameters were analyzed using the following formula:(1)
Basal area of a tree =C2/4π or π(C2/39.5).(2)
Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) =(C/π).(3)
Dominance = total cover or basal area of species A/area sampled.(4)
Relative dominance = dominance for species A/total dominance of all species × 100.(5)
Density = (number of individuals of species A/area sampled).(6)
Relative density = (number of individuals of species A/total number of individuals in area) × 100.(7)
Frequency = (number of plots in which species A occurs/total number of plots sampled).(8)
Relative frequency = (frequency value for species A/total of all frequency values for all species) × 100.(9)
Importance value = relative density + relative frequency + relative dominance.Regeneration status of the forest was analyzed by comparing saplings and seedlings with the matured trees according to Dhaulkhandi et al. [21] and Tiwari et al. [22]; that is, the status was good regeneration, if seedlings > saplings > adults; the status was fair regeneration, if seedlings > or ≤ saplings ≤ adults; the status was poor regeneration, if the species survives only in sapling stage (saplings may be ≤ or ≥ adults); and if a species is present only in an adult form it is considered as not regenerating. Multivariate data analysis was carried out using XLSTAT version 2015.2.01.


## 2.1. Description of the Study Area

This study was carried out in Oda forest which is 25 km away from Humbo Tebela, the town of the Humbo district, which is located 420 km away from Addis Ababa. The forest is found in SNNPR, Wolaita zone, Humbo Woreda, Hobicha Bongota kebele (6°44′ and 37°52′N; 37°53′ and 38°00′E), Figure1. It lies within the midland relatively low agroecological zone at altitude ranges from 1625 to 1929 masl and the vegetation can be classified as the dry woodland forest type. It had been covered by dense vegetation of broad-leaved vegetation types and montane forests before they were cleared around fifty years ago [12].Figure 1
Map of study area.


## 2.2. Data Collection

The data collection was conducted from October to December 2014. A total of 32 quadrats (20 m × 20 m) lying far apart at 100 m were used for shrub and tree data based on aspect of the vegetation. In each major plot, subplots (1 m2) were established at the center and corner for seedlings and saplings data. All woody species with DBH ≥ 2.5 cm were recorded and their growth habits described. Individuals having DBH < 2.5 cm and height ≤ 0.6 m were counted as seedling whereas individuals with 2.5 cm ≤ DBH ≤ 15 cm and 0.61 ≤ height ≤ 3 m were counted as sapling. The DBH was measured at 1.3 m from the ground. Altitude, slope, and aspect were measured using GPS and clinometers. Species not identified on spot were identified using published volumes of the Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea and ETH [16–20].


## 2.3. Data Analysis

Density, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), frequency, dominance, basal area, and IVI were used for description of vegetation structure. Bar graphs were developed using the DBH versus density of individuals for four arbitrary diameter classes (1 ≤ 5 cm, 2 = 5.1–10 cm, 3 = 10.1–15 cm, and 4 ≥ 15 cm) of the forest as well as the selected dominant species. The structural parameters were analyzed using the following formula:(1)
Basal area of a tree =C2/4π or π(C2/39.5).(2)
Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) =(C/π).(3)
Dominance = total cover or basal area of species A/area sampled.(4)
Relative dominance = dominance for species A/total dominance of all species × 100.(5)
Density = (number of individuals of species A/area sampled).(6)
Relative density = (number of individuals of species A/total number of individuals in area) × 100.(7)
Frequency = (number of plots in which species A occurs/total number of plots sampled).(8)
Relative frequency = (frequency value for species A/total of all frequency values for all species) × 100.(9)
Importance value = relative density + relative frequency + relative dominance.Regeneration status of the forest was analyzed by comparing saplings and seedlings with the matured trees according to Dhaulkhandi et al. [21] and Tiwari et al. [22]; that is, the status was good regeneration, if seedlings > saplings > adults; the status was fair regeneration, if seedlings > or ≤ saplings ≤ adults; the status was poor regeneration, if the species survives only in sapling stage (saplings may be ≤ or ≥ adults); and if a species is present only in an adult form it is considered as not regenerating. Multivariate data analysis was carried out using XLSTAT version 2015.2.01.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Species Composition

A total of 62 woody species representing 54 genera and 32 families were identified. Out of the total families 58.8% were represented by one species. Fabaceae (8 species) and Combretaceae and Oleaceae (4 species each) were found to be the most species rich families but some of the families like Vitaceae, Ulmaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Ebenaceae, Olacaceae, and Myrsinaceae were found to be the least species rich families (1 species each).Calpurnia aurea from Fabaceae,Schrebera alata from Oleaceae, andCombretum molle from Combretaceae were found to be the most abundant species. 38 species (62.5%) in the forest were represented by importance value less than 1%. Some of the species included in this group wereCombretum aculeatum,Croton macrostachyus,Uvaria schweinfurthii,Maytenus gracilipes,Protea gaguedi,Capparis fascicularis, andOzoroa pulcherrima.Dodonaea angustifolia andCombretum molle were found to be the most dominant and abundant species in the forest and constituted 27.3% of the total importance value. But 72.7% of importance value represented 60 species including the least abundant species likeSansevieria ehrenbergii,Rytigynia neglecta,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Triumfetta brachyceras, andGrewia velutina.


### 3.2. Vegetation Structure

The total density of woody species in Oda forest was4745±22.957 SE individuals ha−1.Dodonaea angustifolia has the highest density ha−1 (1295) followed byCombretum molle (625). ButGrewia velutina andTriumfetta brachyceras have the least density of individuals ha−1 (0.61). The density ofEuclea schimperi,Rhus natalensis,Combretum collinum, andSchrebera alata was 291, 262, 203, and 202 individuals ha−1. On the other hand,Grewia velutina,Triumfetta brachyceras,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Rytigynia neglecta,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Ximenia americana, andSolanum incanum have the density less than five individuals ha−1. There is significant difference in density between species (p<0.02). The most frequent woody species wasDodonaea angustifolia (i.e., 1) followed byCombretum molle (i.e., 0.94) but the least frequent species wereGrewia velutina,Triumfetta brachyceras,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Pterolobium stellatum,Rytigynia neglecta,Sansevieria ehrenbergii, andPappea capensis (i.e., 0.03), Table 1. The multivariate tests indicated that frequency of species is significantly affected by slope (p<0.002), altitude (p<0.0001), and aspect (p<0.001) at adjusted R2=0.597. The total mean dominance of woody species was 209651±906.219 SE.Combretum molle (21.9%) is found to be the most dominant species followed byAcokanthera schimperi (10.7%). But the species of less than 0.01% dominance wereOsyris quadripartite,Clutia lanceolata,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Capparis fascicularis,Ximenia americana,Triumfetta brachyceras,Grewia velutina,Gnidia glauca,Rytigynia neglecta,Crotalaria pallid,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum, andPterolobium stellatum.Dodonaea angustifolia (14.1%) had the highest IVI followed byCombretum molle (13.2%). Species with IVI less than 2% includedSolanum incanum,Ximenia americana,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Rytigynia neglecta,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Triumfetta brachyceras, andGrewia velutina, Table 1. The altitude and slope have an equally strong significant (p<0.0001) effect on basal area and dominance of species between quadrats.Table 1
Density ha−1, dominance, frequency, and IVI of species.
Scientific name
Density ha−1
Frequency
Dominance
IVI
Acacia hockii De Wild.
65
0.56
3733
5.9
Acacia senegal (L.) Willd.
45
0.09
343
1.6
Acokanthera schimperi (A.DC.) Schweinf.
48
0.19
22332
12.6
Albizia schimperianaOliv.
26
0.41
318
1.5
Allophylus abyssinicus (Hochst.) Radlk.
49
0.72
945
5.0
Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth.
133
0.53
3797
7.2
Capparis fascicularis
6
0.19
13
1.0
Carissa edulis
(Forssk.) Vahl
181
0.72
4894
9.6
Celtis africanaBurm. f.
11
0.13
530
1.1
Clutia abyssinica Jaub. & Spach
36
0.52
665
3.6
Clutia lanceolataForssk.
14
0.41
15
2.0
Combretum aculeatum Vent.
20
0.31
871
2.3
Combretum collinumFresen. subsp. binderianum (Kotschy) Okafor
203
0.53
16186
14.6
Combretum molle (R. Br. ex G. Don)
625
0.94
45871
39.7
Crotalaria pallida L.
3
0.16
3
0.9
Croton macrostachyusHochst. ex Delile.
17
0.25
1311
2.2
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn.
95
0.75
2034
6.7
Dodonaea angustifolia L. f.
1295
1
21447
42.3
Entada abyssinicaSteud. ex A.
3
0.19
145
1.1
Erica arborea L.
1
0.03
2
0.2
Euclea schimperi (A.DC.) Dandy
291
0.52
10566
13.7
Ficus ingens (Miq.) Miq.
10
0.09
331
0.9
Ficus vastaForssk.
3
0.09
6595
3.7
Flacourtia indica (Burm. f.) Merr.
1
0.13
233
0.8
Gnidia glauca (Fresen.) Gilg.
6
0.25
9
1.4
Grewia bicolorA. Juss.
36
0.47
862
3.5
Grewia velutina (Forssk.) Vahl
0.61
0.03
9
0.2
Hypericum revolutum Vahl.
119
0.69
601
6.2
Jasminum floribundum R. Br. ex Fresen
23
0.75
36
4.2
Maerua angolensisDC.
20
0.44
690
2.9
Markhamia lutea (Benth.) K.Schum.
18
0.41
655
2.4
Maytenus gracilipes (Welw. ex Oliv.) Exell
13
0.47
82
2.6
Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell
9
0.22
218
1.4
Myrsine africana L.
20
0.25
420
1.8
Myrtus communis L.
70
0.59
2643
5.6
Ocimum gratissimum L.
1
0.03
0
0.2
Olea capensis L.
133
0.34
7656
8.2
Olea europaeaL. subsp.cuspidata (Wall. ex G. Don) Cif.
139
0.53
8360
9.5
Olinia rochetianaA. Juss.
54
0.34
1307
3.5
Osyris quadripartita Decn.
12
0.41
15
2.0
Ozoroa pulcherrima (Schweinf.) R. & A. Fernandes
23
0.22
1842
2.5
Pappea capensis Eckl. & Zeyh.
5
0.03
497
0.6
Protea gaguedi J. F. Gmel.
16
0.13
616
1.2
Pterolobium stellatum (Forssk.) Brenan ·
1
0.03
0
2.4
Rhamnus prinoidesL’Herit.
13
0.22
698
1.7
Rhoicissus revoilii Planch.
10
0.25
44
1.5
Rhus natalensisBernh. ex C.Krauss
262
0.69
9648
13.5
Rothmannia urcelliformis (Hiern) Robyns
15
0.09
213
0.9
Rytigynia neglecta (Hiern) Robyns
1
0.03
5
0.2
Salacia congolensis De Wild. & Th. Dur.
6
0.06
117
0.5
Sansevieria ehrenbergii Schweinf. ex Baker
1
0.03
14
0.2
Schrebera alata (Hochst.) Welw.
202
0.69
10233
12.5
Solanum incanumL.
1
0.06
2
0.3
Steganotaenia araliaceaHochst. ex A. Rich.
2
0.09
295
0.7
Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC.
143
0.47
8611
9.4
Teclea nobilis Del.
9
0.16
505
1.2
Terminalia schimperiana Hochst.
99
0.72
6146
8.5
Tricalysia niamniamensis Hiern
33
0.09
824
1.6
Triumfetta brachyceras K.Schum.
0.61
0.03
11
0.2
Uvaria scheffleri Diels.
34
0.22
621
2.1
Vernonia karaguensis Oliv.
19
0.25
706
2.0
Ximenia americana L.
1
0.06
12
0.3


### 3.3. Population Structure of the Forest and Selected Woody Species

The species density distribution by DBH class of Oda forest showed right skewed pattern (Figure2). However, this pattern does not depict the general trends of population dynamics and recruitment processes of a given species. Analysis of population structures for each individual tree and shrub species could provide more realistic and specific information for conservation measures.Figure 2
Vegetation structure of Oda forest.Diameter class distribution of selected tree species demonstrated various patterns of population structure, implying different population dynamics among species. InCombretum molle andCombretum collinum the DBH class <5 cm has the least species distribution (i.e., 11.3% and 5.7%, resp.) but the highest density (69.1% and 66.8%, resp.) is found in DBH class 5–10 cm. InAcokanthera schimperi andSchrebera alata the DBH class 10.1–15 cm has the least species distribution (i.e., 7.4% and 6%, resp.) but the highest species distribution (i.e., 71.3% and 74.3%, resp.) was found in DBH class 5–10 cm. InEuclea schimperi, 44.9% species distribution was in DBH class <5 cm, 50% distribution was in DBH class 5–10 cm, and 5.1% distribution was in DBH class 10.1–15 cm. Therefore, these species resulted in bell shaped pattern; howeverCombretum molle andCombretum collinumhave higher species density distribution in DBH class 10.1–15 cm than that ofAcokanthera schimperi andSchrebera alata. In bell shaped pattern the middle DBH classes have higher species density distribution than the lower and higher DBH classes. InDodonaea angustifolia higher species density (78.7%) distribution is found in DBH class <5 cm but lower species distribution (21.3%) is found in DBH class 5–10 cm. Therefore it resulted in inverted J shaped pattern. In general, except inCombretum molle the DBH class >15 cm has no species distribution in all other selected species, Figure 3.Figure 3
Vegetation structure of selected dominant species.


### 3.4. Regeneration Status

In Oda forest 55 species (89.1%), 9 species (15.6%), and 5 species (7.8%) have no seedling, sapling, and matured tree, respectively. On the other hand the seedling, sapling, and matured tree consist of 2.3%, 23.7%, and 74% density ha−1 of individuals, respectively. The only woody species representing the seedling stage areCombretum molle,Dodonaea angustifolia,Euclea schimperi,Hypericum revolutum,Myrtus communis, andOlea capensis. Woody species that had no representation of seedling and sapling stage areEntada abyssinica,Ficus vasta,Grewia velutina,Myrtus communis,Rhoicissus revoilii,Rytigynia neglecta,Triumfetta brachyceras, andXimenia americana butCapparis fascicularis,Crotalaria pallid,Ocimum gratissimum, andSolanum incanum had no representation of seedling and matured tree.Dodonaea angustifolia was the most abundant species in seedling (72%), sapling (25.8%), and matured stage (25.7%).Grevillea robusta andMyrtus communis were species with only one individual in seedling butCeltis africana,Croton macrostachyus,Erica arborea,Grevillea robusta, andPappea capensis were species with one individual in sapling stage. In matured stageErica arborea,Grewia velutina, andTriumfetta brachyceras were species with one individual.


## 3.1. Species Composition

A total of 62 woody species representing 54 genera and 32 families were identified. Out of the total families 58.8% were represented by one species. Fabaceae (8 species) and Combretaceae and Oleaceae (4 species each) were found to be the most species rich families but some of the families like Vitaceae, Ulmaceae, Thymelaeaceae, Ebenaceae, Olacaceae, and Myrsinaceae were found to be the least species rich families (1 species each).Calpurnia aurea from Fabaceae,Schrebera alata from Oleaceae, andCombretum molle from Combretaceae were found to be the most abundant species. 38 species (62.5%) in the forest were represented by importance value less than 1%. Some of the species included in this group wereCombretum aculeatum,Croton macrostachyus,Uvaria schweinfurthii,Maytenus gracilipes,Protea gaguedi,Capparis fascicularis, andOzoroa pulcherrima.Dodonaea angustifolia andCombretum molle were found to be the most dominant and abundant species in the forest and constituted 27.3% of the total importance value. But 72.7% of importance value represented 60 species including the least abundant species likeSansevieria ehrenbergii,Rytigynia neglecta,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Triumfetta brachyceras, andGrewia velutina.


## 3.2. Vegetation Structure

The total density of woody species in Oda forest was4745±22.957 SE individuals ha−1.Dodonaea angustifolia has the highest density ha−1 (1295) followed byCombretum molle (625). ButGrewia velutina andTriumfetta brachyceras have the least density of individuals ha−1 (0.61). The density ofEuclea schimperi,Rhus natalensis,Combretum collinum, andSchrebera alata was 291, 262, 203, and 202 individuals ha−1. On the other hand,Grewia velutina,Triumfetta brachyceras,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Rytigynia neglecta,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Ximenia americana, andSolanum incanum have the density less than five individuals ha−1. There is significant difference in density between species (p<0.02). The most frequent woody species wasDodonaea angustifolia (i.e., 1) followed byCombretum molle (i.e., 0.94) but the least frequent species wereGrewia velutina,Triumfetta brachyceras,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Pterolobium stellatum,Rytigynia neglecta,Sansevieria ehrenbergii, andPappea capensis (i.e., 0.03), Table 1. The multivariate tests indicated that frequency of species is significantly affected by slope (p<0.002), altitude (p<0.0001), and aspect (p<0.001) at adjusted R2=0.597. The total mean dominance of woody species was 209651±906.219 SE.Combretum molle (21.9%) is found to be the most dominant species followed byAcokanthera schimperi (10.7%). But the species of less than 0.01% dominance wereOsyris quadripartite,Clutia lanceolata,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Capparis fascicularis,Ximenia americana,Triumfetta brachyceras,Grewia velutina,Gnidia glauca,Rytigynia neglecta,Crotalaria pallid,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum, andPterolobium stellatum.Dodonaea angustifolia (14.1%) had the highest IVI followed byCombretum molle (13.2%). Species with IVI less than 2% includedSolanum incanum,Ximenia americana,Sansevieria ehrenbergii,Rytigynia neglecta,Erica arborea,Ocimum gratissimum,Triumfetta brachyceras, andGrewia velutina, Table 1. The altitude and slope have an equally strong significant (p<0.0001) effect on basal area and dominance of species between quadrats.Table 1
Density ha−1, dominance, frequency, and IVI of species.
Scientific name
Density ha−1
Frequency
Dominance
IVI
Acacia hockii De Wild.
65
0.56
3733
5.9
Acacia senegal (L.) Willd.
45
0.09
343
1.6
Acokanthera schimperi (A.DC.) Schweinf.
48
0.19
22332
12.6
Albizia schimperianaOliv.
26
0.41
318
1.5
Allophylus abyssinicus (Hochst.) Radlk.
49
0.72
945
5.0
Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth.
133
0.53
3797
7.2
Capparis fascicularis
6
0.19
13
1.0
Carissa edulis
(Forssk.) Vahl
181
0.72
4894
9.6
Celtis africanaBurm. f.
11
0.13
530
1.1
Clutia abyssinica Jaub. & Spach
36
0.52
665
3.6
Clutia lanceolataForssk.
14
0.41
15
2.0
Combretum aculeatum Vent.
20
0.31
871
2.3
Combretum collinumFresen. subsp. binderianum (Kotschy) Okafor
203
0.53
16186
14.6
Combretum molle (R. Br. ex G. Don)
625
0.94
45871
39.7
Crotalaria pallida L.
3
0.16
3
0.9
Croton macrostachyusHochst. ex Delile.
17
0.25
1311
2.2
Dichrostachys cinerea (L.) Wight & Arn.
95
0.75
2034
6.7
Dodonaea angustifolia L. f.
1295
1
21447
42.3
Entada abyssinicaSteud. ex A.
3
0.19
145
1.1
Erica arborea L.
1
0.03
2
0.2
Euclea schimperi (A.DC.) Dandy
291
0.52
10566
13.7
Ficus ingens (Miq.) Miq.
10
0.09
331
0.9
Ficus vastaForssk.
3
0.09
6595
3.7
Flacourtia indica (Burm. f.) Merr.
1
0.13
233
0.8
Gnidia glauca (Fresen.) Gilg.
6
0.25
9
1.4
Grewia bicolorA. Juss.
36
0.47
862
3.5
Grewia velutina (Forssk.) Vahl
0.61
0.03
9
0.2
Hypericum revolutum Vahl.
119
0.69
601
6.2
Jasminum floribundum R. Br. ex Fresen
23
0.75
36
4.2
Maerua angolensisDC.
20
0.44
690
2.9
Markhamia lutea (Benth.) K.Schum.
18
0.41
655
2.4
Maytenus gracilipes (Welw. ex Oliv.) Exell
13
0.47
82
2.6
Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell
9
0.22
218
1.4
Myrsine africana L.
20
0.25
420
1.8
Myrtus communis L.
70
0.59
2643
5.6
Ocimum gratissimum L.
1
0.03
0
0.2
Olea capensis L.
133
0.34
7656
8.2
Olea europaeaL. subsp.cuspidata (Wall. ex G. Don) Cif.
139
0.53
8360
9.5
Olinia rochetianaA. Juss.
54
0.34
1307
3.5
Osyris quadripartita Decn.
12
0.41
15
2.0
Ozoroa pulcherrima (Schweinf.) R. & A. Fernandes
23
0.22
1842
2.5
Pappea capensis Eckl. & Zeyh.
5
0.03
497
0.6
Protea gaguedi J. F. Gmel.
16
0.13
616
1.2
Pterolobium stellatum (Forssk.) Brenan ·
1
0.03
0
2.4
Rhamnus prinoidesL’Herit.
13
0.22
698
1.7
Rhoicissus revoilii Planch.
10
0.25
44
1.5
Rhus natalensisBernh. ex C.Krauss
262
0.69
9648
13.5
Rothmannia urcelliformis (Hiern) Robyns
15
0.09
213
0.9
Rytigynia neglecta (Hiern) Robyns
1
0.03
5
0.2
Salacia congolensis De Wild. & Th. Dur.
6
0.06
117
0.5
Sansevieria ehrenbergii Schweinf. ex Baker
1
0.03
14
0.2
Schrebera alata (Hochst.) Welw.
202
0.69
10233
12.5
Solanum incanumL.
1
0.06
2
0.3
Steganotaenia araliaceaHochst. ex A. Rich.
2
0.09
295
0.7
Syzygium guineense (Willd.) DC.
143
0.47
8611
9.4
Teclea nobilis Del.
9
0.16
505
1.2
Terminalia schimperiana Hochst.
99
0.72
6146
8.5
Tricalysia niamniamensis Hiern
33
0.09
824
1.6
Triumfetta brachyceras K.Schum.
0.61
0.03
11
0.2
Uvaria scheffleri Diels.
34
0.22
621
2.1
Vernonia karaguensis Oliv.
19
0.25
706
2.0
Ximenia americana L.
1
0.06
12
0.3


## 3.3. Population Structure of the Forest and Selected Woody Species

The species density distribution by DBH class of Oda forest showed right skewed pattern (Figure2). However, this pattern does not depict the general trends of population dynamics and recruitment processes of a given species. Analysis of population structures for each individual tree and shrub species could provide more realistic and specific information for conservation measures.Figure 2
Vegetation structure of Oda forest.Diameter class distribution of selected tree species demonstrated various patterns of population structure, implying different population dynamics among species. InCombretum molle andCombretum collinum the DBH class <5 cm has the least species distribution (i.e., 11.3% and 5.7%, resp.) but the highest density (69.1% and 66.8%, resp.) is found in DBH class 5–10 cm. InAcokanthera schimperi andSchrebera alata the DBH class 10.1–15 cm has the least species distribution (i.e., 7.4% and 6%, resp.) but the highest species distribution (i.e., 71.3% and 74.3%, resp.) was found in DBH class 5–10 cm. InEuclea schimperi, 44.9% species distribution was in DBH class <5 cm, 50% distribution was in DBH class 5–10 cm, and 5.1% distribution was in DBH class 10.1–15 cm. Therefore, these species resulted in bell shaped pattern; howeverCombretum molle andCombretum collinumhave higher species density distribution in DBH class 10.1–15 cm than that ofAcokanthera schimperi andSchrebera alata. In bell shaped pattern the middle DBH classes have higher species density distribution than the lower and higher DBH classes. InDodonaea angustifolia higher species density (78.7%) distribution is found in DBH class <5 cm but lower species distribution (21.3%) is found in DBH class 5–10 cm. Therefore it resulted in inverted J shaped pattern. In general, except inCombretum molle the DBH class >15 cm has no species distribution in all other selected species, Figure 3.Figure 3
Vegetation structure of selected dominant species.


## 3.4. Regeneration Status

In Oda forest 55 species (89.1%), 9 species (15.6%), and 5 species (7.8%) have no seedling, sapling, and matured tree, respectively. On the other hand the seedling, sapling, and matured tree consist of 2.3%, 23.7%, and 74% density ha−1 of individuals, respectively. The only woody species representing the seedling stage areCombretum molle,Dodonaea angustifolia,Euclea schimperi,Hypericum revolutum,Myrtus communis, andOlea capensis. Woody species that had no representation of seedling and sapling stage areEntada abyssinica,Ficus vasta,Grewia velutina,Myrtus communis,Rhoicissus revoilii,Rytigynia neglecta,Triumfetta brachyceras, andXimenia americana butCapparis fascicularis,Crotalaria pallid,Ocimum gratissimum, andSolanum incanum had no representation of seedling and matured tree.Dodonaea angustifolia was the most abundant species in seedling (72%), sapling (25.8%), and matured stage (25.7%).Grevillea robusta andMyrtus communis were species with only one individual in seedling butCeltis africana,Croton macrostachyus,Erica arborea,Grevillea robusta, andPappea capensis were species with one individual in sapling stage. In matured stageErica arborea,Grewia velutina, andTriumfetta brachyceras were species with one individual.


## 4. Discussion

In this study Fabaceae are the most dominant family with 8 species. The dominance of Fabaceae was reported from similar vegetation studies [23–28]. The dominance indicates suitability of the condition and adaptation of the environment for Fabaceae. Similar to Didita et al. [28] study, most families (58.8%) of Oda forest were represented by one species. In the forest high dominance (i.e., 50.1%) is occupied by a few species (Combretum molle,Acokanthera schimperi,Dodonaea angustifolia, andCombretum collinum).Dodonaea angustifolia had the highest IVI (14.1%) followed byCombretum molle (13.2%). According to Feyera [29] the high dominance and/or abundance of a few species in a forest could be attributed to a number of factors, such as the overharvesting of the desired species, disturbance factors, successional stage of the forest, and/or survival strategies of the species. Many ecological studies [30–33] onA. abyssinica,C. aurea,D. angustifolia,Myrsine africana, andPolyscias fulva revealed that they are successional species. Therefore,Dodonaea angustifolia has been the third dominant species affirming that the Oda forest was in early successional stage. Deribe [12] indicated from his field observation that 26 species would be at maturity of the forests of Humbo Carbon Project. However, our study confirmed the presence of 62 woody species in Oda forest including the planted species likeGrevillea robusta.The population structure in Oda forest established two groups of woody plant species from six species selected by their dominance. The first group includesCombretum molle,Combretum collinum,Acokanthera schimperi,Euclea schimperi, andSchrebera alata which showed bell shaped pattern. In bell shaped pattern the distribution of individuals of a species in the middle diameter classes is high and low in lower and higher diameter classes. According to Feyera et al. [34] bell shaped pattern indicates a poor reproduction and recruitment of species which may be associated with intense competition from the surrounding trees. The second group includesDodonaea angustifolia which resulted in inverted J shaped pattern. Inverted J shaped pattern shows high distribution of individuals of a species in the lower diameter classes and a gradual decrease towards the higher classes. In other words, it shows good reproduction and recruitment potential of the species. Population structure of the forest and selected woody species indicated the absence of individuals in almost all species of the forest in DBH class >15 cm. This and field observation during data collection clearly confirmed the occurrence of high disturbance in matured tree of the forest by cutting of trees for charcoal production, firewood, house construction, and fencing.In Oda forest most of the woody species (89.1%) had no seedling. The only woody species representing the seedling stage areCombretum molle,Dodonaea angustifolia,Euclea schimperi,Hypericum revolutum,Myrtus communis, andOlea capensis. In the forest the seedling, sapling, and matured tree accounted for 2.3%, 23.7%, and 74% density ha−1 of individuals, respectively. Density ha−1 of individuals of species showed that the seedling < sapling < matured tree in Oda forest. According to Dhaulkhandi et al. [21], the density values of seedling and saplings are considered as regeneration potential of the species. Based on the criteria of Dhaulkhandi et al. [21] and Tiwari et al. [22] the forest of Oda was categorized under the forests with fair regeneration. In the present study area, some physiographic conditions, worse habitats, lack of awareness of villagers for conservation of forest, series previous disturbance occurring in the area, and immaturity of old trees to produce seed were considered as the causes of less regeneration of the forest.Dodonaea angustifolia was the most abundant species in seedling (72%) and sapling (25.8%).Grevillea robusta andMyrtus communis were species with only one individual in seedling andCeltis africana,Croton macrostachyus,Erica arborea,Grevillea robusta, andPappea capensis were species with one individual in sapling stage.Altitude and slope of Oda forest significantly affected the basal area, dominance, and frequency of species while the aspect of vegetation significantly affected only the distribution of the species. The effect of altitude, aspect, and slope on dominance, basal area, and distribution of species is mainly related with their influence on light radiation, temperature, moisture, runoff, and infiltration. Similarly, Kumelachew and Tamrat [35], Hedberg [36] confirmed the effect of altitude on radiation, temperature, atmospheric pressure, and moisture. Besides, Teshome et al. [24] ensured effect of slope on runoff, drainage, and moisture. The influence of slope, altitude, and aspect of vegetation on moisture availability not only affects the dominance, basal area, and distribution of species but also affects regeneration status of the vegetation. It is also similar to McDonald et al. [37] idea, which states that the sensitivity of plants to moisture availability renders the regeneration of the dry forests. The regeneration of the forest is affected not only by environmental factors but also by anthropogenic activities. Some of the anthropogenic activities seriously observed during data collection were cutting of trees for charcoal production, constructing wood, fence, and mowing grasses for fodder and covering roof of house which are related with observation by Deribe [12].


## 5. Conclusion and Recommendation

Humbo Community-Based Forest Management Project is a reforestation forestry project designed for sequestration of carbon through biodiverse native of natural forest managed by the local community. Oda forest is one of the seven forests demarcated in seven kebele associations. It consists of 62 woody species representing 54 genera and 32 families. Among these speciesDodonaea angustifolia andCombretum molle were found to be the densest and the most dominant and frequent species with higher IVI in the forest. Frequency of species is significantly affected by slope (p<0.002), altitude (p<0.0001), and aspect (p<0.001). Besides, altitude and slope have an equally strong significant (p<0.0001) effect on basal area and dominance of species between quadrats. The population structure of selected woody species established two groups (bell shaped and inverted J shaped patterns). In Oda forest 55 species (89.1%), 9 species (15.6%), and 5 species (7.8%) have no seedling, sapling, and matured tree, respectively. On the other hand, the seedling, sapling, and matured tree consist of 2.3%, 23.7%, and 74% density ha−1 of individuals, respectively. The forest of Oda was categorized under the forests with fair regeneration because the density ha−1 of seedling is less than that of sapling. Therefore the government, NGOs, and community must give conservation and management priority for species with IVI less than 1%, species with no seedling, and families represented by only one species.



---

*Source: 963816-2015-09-27.xml*