# New Topological Configurations in the Continuous Heisenberg Spin Chain: Lower Bound for the Energy

Authors: Rossen Dandoloff
Journal: Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

In order to study the spin configurations of the classical one-dimensional Heisenberg model, we map the normalized unit vector, representing the spin, on a space curve. We show that the total chirality of the configuration is a conserved quantity. If, for example, one end of the space curve is rotated by an angle of 2π relative to the other, the Frenet frame traces out a noncontractible loop in SO(3) and this defines a new class of topological spin configurations for the Heisenberg model.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

It is well known that the two-dimensional continuous Heisenberg model has very nice topological properties [1]. The order parameter is a normalized vector field n2=1 (therefore, the order parameter manifold is S2). If we impose homogenous boundary conditions on the vector field n(r)r→∞=n0 (constant vector field), we can compactify the plane R2 into S2 and therefore the possible field configurations are classified by π2(S2)=Z. The energy in each class is bounded from below H≥nJ, where n is the number of times, S2 is wrapped around S2, and J is the coupling constant in the Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian. These configurations are metastable because the Hamiltonian is symmetric under homothety: Hλ=∫‍((∂n/∂λx)2+∂n/∂λy)2dλxdλy=H (where λ is a real parameter). The one-dimensional Heisenberg model does not have this nice topological property. Under homogeneous boundary conditions, the line R1 may be compactified to S1, and now π1(S2)=0 and there are no different classes of configurations based on homotopy. In order to find out if there is a new topological structure in the one-dimensional case, one has to analyze the Heisenberg Hamiltonian in more detail. The vector field is normalized and therefore we will use the following representation for n=(sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ). Shankar [2] has found that for a finite two-dimensional system (e.g., of radius R) the situation is even worse; that is, all configurations are point-like. Now, we will concentrate on the finite one-dimensional case.


## 2. Materials and Methods

Inθ and ϕ variables, the Hamiltonian has the form (1)H=J∫-L+Lθs2+sin⁡θ2ϕs2ds,where the subscript s stands for d/ds and s denotes the coordinate along R1. This Hamiltonian is not symmetric under homothety transformation s→λs and therefore the spin configurations are not metastable like in the 2D case. The equations of motion for this spin Hamiltonian have been established [3] in taking ϕ and cosθ to be the conjugated generalized coordinate and momentum so that the Poisson bracket gives [ϕ(x),cosθ(y)]=δ(x-y). The generator of translations (momentum) is given by the following expression:(2)P=∫-L+L1-cos⁡θϕsds.It verifies the Poisson brackets:[ϕ(s),P]=-ϕs and [cosθ(s),P]=-(d/ds)cosθ(s). These relationships have first been proven for an infinite chain by Tjon and Wright [3]. P is a constant of the motion.For our analysis of the possible spin configurations, it is useful to map the unit vectorn to the unit tangent of a space curve [4]. Now, different space curves will represent different spin configurations. We will impose homogeneous boundary conditions; that is, spins at ±L will be parallel. Then, curves representing the different spin configurations will tend to the straight line as s→±L. Here, we will concentrate on the geometrical and topological quantities characterizing these space curves. Of special interest for us will be the writhe of a curve (which characterizes the chirality of the curve). For a closed curve, it is defined as follows (see, e.g., [5]):(3)Wr=14π∮ds∮ds′rs-rs′·ns×ns′rs-rs′3.The tip of the radius vectorr draws the curve, while n is the unit tangent. The writhe is properly defined on a ribbon or on a thin rod. After taking the width of the ribbon to zero, one gets the writhe for a closed curve. For the proper definition of the writhe of an open curve (where at both ends of the curve the tangents are parallel to each other), one has to complete the open curve by a closure at infinity which makes the combined curve a closed curve (see, e.g., Figure 1). We have to distinguish two classes of homotopically equivalent curves: one where two ends of the curve are rotated to each other by 2π and the other where the two ends are rotated by 4π [6, 7]. This last class includes the straight line (i.e., the ground state for the spin configuration). The first class of curves cannot be transformed continually into the ground state without crossing the curve itself. For this reason, we have to keep a memory of the triad defined on the ribbon [6]. These two classes are due to the fact that group SO(3) is nonsimply connected manifold and closed loops in SO(3) fall into two classes: those that can be contracted to a point and those for which this is impossible. A triad evolving on the space curve from s=-L to s=L traces out a closed curve on SO(3) (see, e.g., [8]).Figure 1
Spin configuration.A theorem by Fuller [9] allows one to express Wr as an integral of a local quantity. We will express Wr with respect to a reference curve C0 [10]: (4)Wr=Wr0+12π∫-L+Ln0×n·d/dsn0+n1+n0·nds,where Wr0 is the writhe of the reference curve. The simplest choice is the straight line C0=(0,0,s) and then n0=(0,0,1) and Wr0=0 [10]. A simple calculation gives the following expression for the writhe: (5)Wr=12π∫-L+L1-cos⁡θϕsds.


## 3. Results and Discussion

Our first observation is that the writheWr for the spin configurations (quantity that characterizes the chirality of the spin configuration) coincides with the total momentum P. The total momentum P is a conserved quantity:it follows thatWris a conserved quantity too. This will lead us to a new class of possible excitations for the continuous classical spin Heisenberg model. We will note first that the writhe Wr suffers discontinuity when one region of the curve crosses another and the jump is always +2 [5]. This means that all configurations that belong to the configuration of the ground state (θ=0 for the real spins) are separated from all the other classes of configurations by a jump of the writhe Wr. One configuration that does not belong to the ground state class of configurations is that represented by a space curve whose two ends are rotated by 2π to each other. Let us consider one such configuration: the space curve representing the spin configuration goes from -L to +L. This curve is completed by a straight line between -L and -∞ and between +L and +∞ and is closed by a semicircle at infinity in order to form a closed curve (see Figure 1). Note that on the straight segments and on the semicircle at infinity the curvature k is zero. The writhe is zero for both straight segments when s∈±(L,∞) and for the infinite semicircle. This geometrical construction does not change the writhe of the actual curve. Such a curve belongs to a whole class of configurations which deform smoothly from one to another and are separated from the ground state class by a jump in the writhe Wr. Belonging to this class of configurations will have consequences for the energy of the spin configuration too. It is well known that for a closed space curve [11] (6)∮kds≥2π.Now, because the curvature k≠0 only for s∈(-L,+L), the above inequality is equivalent to (7)∫-L+Lkds≥2π.Let us now consider the following Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:(8)∫-L+Lkds2≤2L∫-L+Lk2ds.In Euler angles, the curvaturek2=θs2+sin2θϕs2 (see, e.g., [12]).Therefore, the energy of the spin chain satisfies the obvious inequality:(9)H=J∫-L+Lθs2+sin2⁡θϕs2ds=J∫-L+Lk2ds≥J∫-L+Lkds22L≥J4π22L=J2π2L.


## 4. Conclusions

The writheWr that characterizes the chirality of the spin configuration is a conserved quantity. The energy of the spin configuration is limited from below for this class of configurations (the ends of the space curve are rotated by 2π to each other). Obviously, for an infinite chain L→∞, there is no more difference in the lower bounds for the energy in the two homotopy classes. On the other hand, the barrier which separates P from the zeroth class remains. The above result is consistent with the inequality for the elastic energy of thin rod whose ends are rotated by 2π relative to each other [8], where the result is based on the same property of the rotation group SO(3). In this case, the thin rod has only bending rigidity J and no torsional rigidity.We have shown that there are topological configurations for the Heisenberg spin model even in the one-dimensional case.



---

*Source: 954524-2015-08-19.xml*