# Preclinical Evidence and Mechanism of Xingnaojing Injection for Cerebral Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies

Authors: Rong Ma; Xiao Ma; Jianxia Wen; Jian Wang; Qian Xie; Nian Chen; Taiwei Dong
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2018)

---

## Abstract

Objectives. Cerebral ischemia can cause severe harm to people’s health with the characteristics of high incidence, high disability, and high mortality. Xingnaojing injection (XNJI) is widely used in the treatment of cerebral ischemia. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and mechanism of XNJI in animal models of cerebral ischemia.Methods. Total seven electronic databases in English or Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, VMIS, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) about most experiments and studies which came out before June 2018 of XNJI for cerebral ischemia have been searched. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analysis are conducted according to the Cochrane standards and RevMan 5.3 software.Results. We have identified 23 eligible studies and made a meta-analysis based on these studies. Meta-analysis shows that XNJI contributes significantly to reduction in neurological deficit score (P= 0.0002, MD = −1.25, 95%CI: −1.92, −0.58) compared with the control group of cerebral ischemia. Subgroup analytic results demonstrate that XNJI has been more effective in animal model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury (P= 0.009, MD = −1.35, 95%CI: −2.36, −0.34) than that of permanent cerebral ischemia (P= 0.0002, MD = −1.08, 95%CI: −1.66, −0.51). Compared with control group, XNJI could remarkably reduce cerebral infarction area (P< 0.00001, MD = −14.98, 95%CI: −21.36, −8.59), brain edema (P< 0.00001, MD = −4.64, 95%CI: −5.38, −3.90), and neuronal cell apoptosis (P < 0.0001, MD = −12.21, 95%CI: 18.05, −6.37). Meanwhile, the meta-analysis shows that XNJI has a significant anti-inflammatory effect, and the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β are significantly reduced by XNJI (P = 0.001, MD = −4.13, 95%CI:−6.68, −1.58;P < 0.00001, MD = −119.23, 95%CI: −138.04, −100.43;P = 0.21, MD = −228.69, 95%CI: −586.20, 128.83). Additionally, XNJI could raise the body's antioxidant function and the level of SOD and GSH-Px (P = 0.002, MD = 53.02, 95%CI: −20.52, 85.78;P= 0.01, MD = 8.65, 95%CI: 1.77, 15.48) and decrease the level of MDA (P < 0.00001, MD = −4.16, 95%CI: −5.50, −2.82).Conclusion. XNJI might be effective in cerebral ischemia by regulating oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cerebral ischemia is commonly known as ischemia stroke, accounting for more than 80% of stroke cases. It seriously harms people’s health with high incidence, high disability, and high mortality [1, 2]. As reported, ischemia stroke is a major cause of global mortality and morbidity [3–5]. With the fast pace of modern life and the gradual increase of modern stress, the rate of stroke has increased year by year, and it is tending to encroach on younger adults. Moreover, stroke leads to varying degrees of functional impairment for survivors, which brings serious burden to family and society. It is believed that the increasing global impact of ischemia stroke in the few decades will certainly affect the healthcare in several developing countries, including China.Cerebral ischemia is caused by cerebral vascular occlusion induced by many reasons. Cerebral vascular occlusion leads to cerebral ischemia, hypoxia, and a series of pathological damage to brain. The physiological of cerebral ischemia is generally thought as a rapid cascade reaction with multilink and multichannel characteristics [6, 7]. In this event, the local steady state is broken and the pathological change is produced with the mix of excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, intracellular calcium overload, inflammatory reaction, cellular swelling, and eventually apoptosis or necrosis. In particular, the injury of blood brain barrier (BBB) structure and function is the key process. When in reperfusion, inflammatory factors could permeate through the damaged BBB into the brain. Moreover, many of the original harmless substances, such as oxygen molecules, will also be harmful via BBB. These factors lead to brain injury, and the brain injury became more serious during reperfusion. This situation causes great difficulty in the treatment of cerebral ischemia patients [8, 9].Currently, the only effective drug for stroke which has been approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), which is thrombolytic therapy by intravenous injection. It can achieve recanalization of blood flowing that is considered to be the most direct and effective treatment method. However, the drug must be used after a short period of limited stroke medication and secondary risk of bleeding; to a certain extent, it limits the clinical application of thrombolytic therapy [10]. Therefore, the new strategy treatment for stroke as well as long-term brain protection of new drugs is still the field of cerebral ischemia injury prevention and research focus and objectives [11]. And western medicine is increasingly recognized as failing to achieve the desired goals in the treatment of complex diseases, whereas traditional Chinese patent medicine (TCPM) can make substantial improvements in these diseases based on traditional Chinese medicine wholism.Xingnaojing injection (XNJI), an effective TCPM, is derived from a classic Chinese emergency prescription named An Gong Niu Huang pills. An Gong Niu Huang pills is from “Treatise on Differentiation and Treatment of Epidemic Febrile Diseases” written by Wu Tang in the Qing Dynasty, which is widely used to cure various acute cerebrovascular diseases with good effectiveness. XNJI is produced by the secondary distillation of steam from the following four herbs: artificialMoschus, syntheticDryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. F., Gardenia jasminoides Ellis, andRadix Curcumae. Moschus.Radix Curcumae. Moschus is the preferred medicine to rescue with aromatics, and combination withDryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. F. could enhance the effect of resuscitation [2, 12]. In recent research, it demonstrated the characteristics and advantages of multitarget, multicomponent and multichannel regulation [12]; XNJI could directly act on the BBB permeability in nerve center by inhibiting inflammatory factors effectively [13–17]. Moreover, it could regulate the effect on cognitive function and antioxidant free radicals [18, 19], alleviate encephaledema, and ameliorate the ischemia, anoxic state anticell autophagy, and apoptosis in brain [16, 20–24].At present, clinical meta-analysis demonstrates that XNJI could promote the recovery of neurological function in patients with cerebral ischemia and reduce the cerebral infarction area [25]. And, there are many studies reporting the mechanism of XNJI on cerebral ischemia; however, there is no publication to summarize the mechanism of Xingnaojing treatment of cerebral ischemia. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental animal studies to gain a better understanding of the effect and mechanism of XNJI on cerebral ischemia and to explore its mechanism further (Figure 1).Figure 1
The meta-analysis process of the literature.


## 2. Methods

### 2.1. Literature Search

Literature filtrating was conducted independently by two investigators (Rong Ma and Jianxia Wen), including Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP medicine information system (VMIS), PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception to June 2018. The following terms searched were used individually or in combination: “Xingnaojing injection” OR “XNJI” AND “stroke” OR “cerebral ischemia” OR “cerebral ischemia-reperfusion”.


### 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: (i) the experiment is based on animal model of cerebral ischemia; (ii) treatment group receives the XNJI only; (iii) the included studies contain control group and XNJI treatment group; (iv) studies must include one of the defined outcome measures. The primary outcome measures are as follows: neurological deficit score, brain edema, cerebral infarction area, and neuronal apoptosis; the second outcome measures: tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and malondialdehyde (MDA).The studies were excluded, if they presented the following criteria: (i) clinical studies; (ii) treatment group without XNJI or combined with other agents; (iii) review and/or meta-analysis; (iv) the primary outcome measures and the second outcome measures which are not included in the literature; (v) duplicated publications; (vi) the article which has only an abstract.


### 2.3. Data Collection

The data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies were conducted independently by two investigators (Rong Ma and Jianxia Wen), and any disagreements were solved through discussion with corresponding author. We have extracted the following data from the included studies: (1) the first author’s name and year of publication; (2) species of animals, animal sex, animal weight, numbers of animals in XNJI treatment group, and control group; (3) the model of cerebral ischemia (transient or permanent), the time of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion, XNJI dosage, and intervention duration; (4) primary and second outcome measures. And if the experimental group of animals in the study received various doses of XNJI, only the data of highest dose of XNJI was included.


### 2.4. Assessment of Methodological Quality

The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) with 10-item quality checklist [26]: (1) publication in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) statement of temperature control; (3) random allocation to groups; (4) allocation concealment; (5) blinded assessment of outcome; (6) use of anesthetic without significant internal protection of blood vessel; (7) appropriate animal model (aged, healthy, diabetic, or hypertensive); (8) sample size calculation; (9) compliance with animal welfare regulations; (10) statement of potential conflict of interests. Each study was assessed and scored on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) points.


### 2.5. Statistical Analysis

All values of neurological deficit score, cerebral infarction area, brain edema, neuronal cell apoptosis, and the level of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA are considered as continuous data and analysed by RevMan 5.3 (2008 The Nordic Cochrane Centre). Outcomes were presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and theI-square (I2) statistic used to assess heterogeneity. If theI2 = 0, which suggested that there is no heterogeneity, fixed effect model would be used to perform a meta-analysis. If theI2 ≤ 50 % orP ≥ 0.1, it is considered minor heterogeneity with fixed effect model. If theI2 > 50% orP< 0.1, there is significant heterogeneity with random effect model.


## 2.1. Literature Search

Literature filtrating was conducted independently by two investigators (Rong Ma and Jianxia Wen), including Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP medicine information system (VMIS), PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from the inception to June 2018. The following terms searched were used individually or in combination: “Xingnaojing injection” OR “XNJI” AND “stroke” OR “cerebral ischemia” OR “cerebral ischemia-reperfusion”.


## 2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows: (i) the experiment is based on animal model of cerebral ischemia; (ii) treatment group receives the XNJI only; (iii) the included studies contain control group and XNJI treatment group; (iv) studies must include one of the defined outcome measures. The primary outcome measures are as follows: neurological deficit score, brain edema, cerebral infarction area, and neuronal apoptosis; the second outcome measures: tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and malondialdehyde (MDA).The studies were excluded, if they presented the following criteria: (i) clinical studies; (ii) treatment group without XNJI or combined with other agents; (iii) review and/or meta-analysis; (iv) the primary outcome measures and the second outcome measures which are not included in the literature; (v) duplicated publications; (vi) the article which has only an abstract.


## 2.3. Data Collection

The data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies were conducted independently by two investigators (Rong Ma and Jianxia Wen), and any disagreements were solved through discussion with corresponding author. We have extracted the following data from the included studies: (1) the first author’s name and year of publication; (2) species of animals, animal sex, animal weight, numbers of animals in XNJI treatment group, and control group; (3) the model of cerebral ischemia (transient or permanent), the time of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion, XNJI dosage, and intervention duration; (4) primary and second outcome measures. And if the experimental group of animals in the study received various doses of XNJI, only the data of highest dose of XNJI was included.


## 2.4. Assessment of Methodological Quality

The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed based on the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) with 10-item quality checklist [26]: (1) publication in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) statement of temperature control; (3) random allocation to groups; (4) allocation concealment; (5) blinded assessment of outcome; (6) use of anesthetic without significant internal protection of blood vessel; (7) appropriate animal model (aged, healthy, diabetic, or hypertensive); (8) sample size calculation; (9) compliance with animal welfare regulations; (10) statement of potential conflict of interests. Each study was assessed and scored on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) points.


## 2.5. Statistical Analysis

All values of neurological deficit score, cerebral infarction area, brain edema, neuronal cell apoptosis, and the level of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA are considered as continuous data and analysed by RevMan 5.3 (2008 The Nordic Cochrane Centre). Outcomes were presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and theI-square (I2) statistic used to assess heterogeneity. If theI2 = 0, which suggested that there is no heterogeneity, fixed effect model would be used to perform a meta-analysis. If theI2 ≤ 50 % orP ≥ 0.1, it is considered minor heterogeneity with fixed effect model. If theI2 > 50% orP< 0.1, there is significant heterogeneity with random effect model.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Study Identification and Selection

A flowchart of the study selection process is shown in Figure2. The search has identified 392 relevant studies. However, we searched few specific studies from the literature search of the foreign language databases because XNJI is only used domestically in China currently. Ultimately, 23 studies with 578 animals were screened by title, abstract and full-text for further quality assessment [13, 16, 17, 20–24, 27–41].Figure 2
Flow diagram of the systematic review.


### 3.2. Study Characteristics

A total of 578 animals (290 in the trial group; 288 in the control group) were included in the 23 studies. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats or Wistar rats were used in most of the animal experiment; other animals such as mongolian gerbil, mice, and rabbits were used in a few experiment. Most of the research projects were male rats, both male and female, were also included. In the selected studies, the experimental animals were predominantly using intravenous or intraperitoneal injection in the dosage of XNJI 0.5 ~ 50 mL/kg and the same volume of normal saline as a control, and most of the dosing methods were administered in a single dose. Additionally, outcomes included neurological deficit score, brain edema, cerebral infarction area, neuronal apoptosis, serum levels of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β), and the antioxidant level of body (SOD, MDA, and GSH-Px). There were also three articles which explored the impact of XNJI on BBB damage [20, 29, 34]. The detailed characteristics of the 23 articles are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The characteristics of the included studies.
Study(year) Special/strain Sex Weight (g) N(T/C) Model Index Intervention Outcome measures isch/rep(h) Control Treatment (duration) Yan et al. 2017 Rat/W M 250± 20 24(12/12) P 2/24 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 5 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, NCA  Li et al. 2016 Rat/W M NR 20(10/10) P 1.5/72 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 20 mL·kg−1·d−1(7d) NDS,TNF-α, CIA  Chen et al. 2015 Rat/W M 200~250 36(18/18) P 0.16/48 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) BE, BBB  Wu 2015 Rat/W M 250 ±50 24(12/12) P 2/70 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 50 mL·kg−1·d−1 (5d) NDS  Zhong et al. 2015 Rat/W M 200~250 108(54/54) P 0.16/72 NR i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(3d) BE, BBB  Huang et al. 2014 Rat/W M 280~300 20(10/10) P 0.3/0.3 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) CIA  Ma 2014 Rat/SD M 200 ±20 12(6/6) T 24/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 3 mL·kg−1·d−1, 3times (1d) NDS, GSH-Px  Zeng 2013 Rat/SD M 280~300 20(10/10) P 2/24 c.i.v NS c.i.v. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) CIA, NCA  Zhu 2012 Rat/SD NR 200 40(20/20) P 2/168 c.i.v. NS c.i.v. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, CIA, NCA  Huang 2012 Mouse M 20~22 24(12/12) P 2/NR i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(5d) CIA, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α  Li and Xie 2011 Rat/SD M 250~300 12(6/6) P 2/24 i.v.NS i.v. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, CIA, IL-6, IL-1β, BBB  Guo et al. 2010 Rat/SD M 200~250 16(8/8) P 2/24 i.v.NS i.v.10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) MDA, SOD, NCA  Wu 2007 Rat/W M 260±10 43(23/20) T 8/- i.p.NS i.p. XNJ 8 mL·kg−1·d−1(5d) TNF-α, BE  Zhang et al. 2006 Mouse M&F 50-80 18(9/9) P 0.16/4 i.v.NS i.v. XNJ 0.685 mL·kg−1·d−1 (1d) SOD  Lu 2006 Rat/SD M 200~250 16(8/8) P 2/48 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) SOD, MDA, NCA  Shen et al. 2004 Rat/SD M 250 ±20 12(6/6) T 6/- NR i.p. 1.25 mL·kg−1·d−1, 2times(1d) NDS  Wang et al. 2004 Rabbit M&F 2200~3000 20(10/10) P 0.5/2 i.v. NS i.v. XNJI mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) MDA, SOD  Zhou et al. 2002 Mouse M 28~30 15(7/8) P 0.08/0.16 NR i.p. XNJ 5 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) GSH-Px, SOD, LMF  Wan et al. 2001 Rat/SD M&F 200~250 16(8/8) T 0.66/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 3 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) GSH-Px  Cai et al. 2000 Rat/W M 205±15 20(10/10) T 3/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NS  Fu et al. 2000 Rat/W M 200~300 30(15/15) P 3/3 NR i.p. XNJ 20 mL·kg−1·d−1(7d) BE, CIA, NCA  Chen et al 2000 Rabbit M&F 2200~3600 20(10/10) P 0.5/2 i.v. NS i.v. XNJ 1 mL·kg−1(1d) TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, BUC  Zhang et al 1997 Rabbit NR 2500~3000 12(6/6) P 0.5/0.5 NR i.v. XNJ 40 mL·kg−1(1d) MDA, GSH-Px, Note. XNJI is Xingnaojing injection; SD is Sprague-Dawley; W is Wistar; M is male; F is female; P is permanent; T is transient; i.p. is intraperitoneal injection; i.v. is intravenous injection; c.i.v. is caudal intravenous injection; NR is not report; Index isch/rep(h) is index ischemia and reperfusion in hours; - means no reperfusion; BE is brain edema; BBB is blood brain barrier; NDS is Neurological Deficit Score; CIA is cerebral infarction area; NCA is Neuronal cell apoptosis; TNF-α is brain tumor factor α; IL-6 is interleukin-6; IL-1β is interleukin-1β; SOD is superoxide dismutase; MDA is malondialdehyde; GSH-Px is glutathione peroxidase.


### 3.3. Methodological Quality

All studies were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Seven studies described the temperature control [13, 29, 30, 32, 33, 37, 39]; eighteen studies described random allocation [13, 16, 20–24, 27–30, 32–36, 38, 40], and four studies reported the random sequence was gene rated by a random number table [29–31, 33]. None of the studies used either allocation concealment or blinded assessment of outcome. As for the use of anesthetics, chloral hydrate was used as anesthetic in nine studies [13, 20–22, 29–31, 33, 38], pentobarbital sodium was used as anesthetic in three studies [16, 32, 40], ethyl ether was used as anesthetic in two studies [23, 39], and isomo pentobarbital sodium, ethyl carbamate, and thiophene sodium were used as anesthetic in one studies, respectively [28, 36, 41]. Six articles did not report the detail of anesthetics [17, 24, 27, 34, 35, 37]. One study chooses rats with hypertensive [32], and others choose the healthy mouse, rats, or rabbits. Fifteen studies described a sample size calculation [16, 17, 20, 21, 24, 27–31, 33, 34, 36, 40, 41]. And, no studies reported compliance with animal welfare regulations or a statement of potential conflict of interests. Details of each experiment are shown in Table 2.Table 2
Quality assessment of included studies.
Study (year) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) score Yan et al. 2017 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Li et al. 2016 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Chen et al. 2015 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Wu 2015 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Zhong et al. 2015 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Huang et al. 2014 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Ma 2014 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 5 Zeng 2013 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Zhu 2012 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Huang 2012 √ √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Li and Xie 2011 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Guo et al. 2010 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ UN UN UN 3 Wu 2007 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Zhang et al. 2006 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Lu 2006 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Shen et al. 2004 √ √ UN UN UN UN √ UN UN UN 3 Wang et al. 2004 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Zhou et al. 2002 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Wan et al. 2001 √ √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Cai et al. 2000 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Fu et al. 2000 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Chen et al. 2000 √ UN UN UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 3 Zhang et al. 1997 √ UN UN UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 4 Note: (1) publication in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) statement of temperature control;(3) random allocation to groups; (4) allocation concealment; (5)blinded assessment of outcome; (6) use of anesthetic without significant internal protection of blood vessel; (7) appropriate animal model (aged, healthy, diabetic, or hypertensive); (8) sample size calculation; (9) compliance with animal welfare regulations; (10) statement of potential conflict of interests. UN is unclear.


## 3.1. Study Identification and Selection

A flowchart of the study selection process is shown in Figure2. The search has identified 392 relevant studies. However, we searched few specific studies from the literature search of the foreign language databases because XNJI is only used domestically in China currently. Ultimately, 23 studies with 578 animals were screened by title, abstract and full-text for further quality assessment [13, 16, 17, 20–24, 27–41].Figure 2
Flow diagram of the systematic review.


## 3.2. Study Characteristics

A total of 578 animals (290 in the trial group; 288 in the control group) were included in the 23 studies. Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats or Wistar rats were used in most of the animal experiment; other animals such as mongolian gerbil, mice, and rabbits were used in a few experiment. Most of the research projects were male rats, both male and female, were also included. In the selected studies, the experimental animals were predominantly using intravenous or intraperitoneal injection in the dosage of XNJI 0.5 ~ 50 mL/kg and the same volume of normal saline as a control, and most of the dosing methods were administered in a single dose. Additionally, outcomes included neurological deficit score, brain edema, cerebral infarction area, neuronal apoptosis, serum levels of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β), and the antioxidant level of body (SOD, MDA, and GSH-Px). There were also three articles which explored the impact of XNJI on BBB damage [20, 29, 34]. The detailed characteristics of the 23 articles are shown in Table 1.Table 1
The characteristics of the included studies.
Study(year) Special/strain Sex Weight (g) N(T/C) Model Index Intervention Outcome measures isch/rep(h) Control Treatment (duration) Yan et al. 2017 Rat/W M 250± 20 24(12/12) P 2/24 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 5 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, NCA  Li et al. 2016 Rat/W M NR 20(10/10) P 1.5/72 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 20 mL·kg−1·d−1(7d) NDS,TNF-α, CIA  Chen et al. 2015 Rat/W M 200~250 36(18/18) P 0.16/48 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) BE, BBB  Wu 2015 Rat/W M 250 ±50 24(12/12) P 2/70 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 50 mL·kg−1·d−1 (5d) NDS  Zhong et al. 2015 Rat/W M 200~250 108(54/54) P 0.16/72 NR i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(3d) BE, BBB  Huang et al. 2014 Rat/W M 280~300 20(10/10) P 0.3/0.3 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) CIA  Ma 2014 Rat/SD M 200 ±20 12(6/6) T 24/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 3 mL·kg−1·d−1, 3times (1d) NDS, GSH-Px  Zeng 2013 Rat/SD M 280~300 20(10/10) P 2/24 c.i.v NS c.i.v. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) CIA, NCA  Zhu 2012 Rat/SD NR 200 40(20/20) P 2/168 c.i.v. NS c.i.v. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, CIA, NCA  Huang 2012 Mouse M 20~22 24(12/12) P 2/NR i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(5d) CIA, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α  Li and Xie 2011 Rat/SD M 250~300 12(6/6) P 2/24 i.v.NS i.v. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NDS, CIA, IL-6, IL-1β, BBB  Guo et al. 2010 Rat/SD M 200~250 16(8/8) P 2/24 i.v.NS i.v.10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) MDA, SOD, NCA  Wu 2007 Rat/W M 260±10 43(23/20) T 8/- i.p.NS i.p. XNJ 8 mL·kg−1·d−1(5d) TNF-α, BE  Zhang et al. 2006 Mouse M&F 50-80 18(9/9) P 0.16/4 i.v.NS i.v. XNJ 0.685 mL·kg−1·d−1 (1d) SOD  Lu 2006 Rat/SD M 200~250 16(8/8) P 2/48 i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 10 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) SOD, MDA, NCA  Shen et al. 2004 Rat/SD M 250 ±20 12(6/6) T 6/- NR i.p. 1.25 mL·kg−1·d−1, 2times(1d) NDS  Wang et al. 2004 Rabbit M&F 2200~3000 20(10/10) P 0.5/2 i.v. NS i.v. XNJI mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) MDA, SOD  Zhou et al. 2002 Mouse M 28~30 15(7/8) P 0.08/0.16 NR i.p. XNJ 5 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) GSH-Px, SOD, LMF  Wan et al. 2001 Rat/SD M&F 200~250 16(8/8) T 0.66/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 3 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) GSH-Px  Cai et al. 2000 Rat/W M 205±15 20(10/10) T 3/- i.p. NS i.p. XNJ 2 mL·kg−1·d−1(1d) NS  Fu et al. 2000 Rat/W M 200~300 30(15/15) P 3/3 NR i.p. XNJ 20 mL·kg−1·d−1(7d) BE, CIA, NCA  Chen et al 2000 Rabbit M&F 2200~3600 20(10/10) P 0.5/2 i.v. NS i.v. XNJ 1 mL·kg−1(1d) TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, BUC  Zhang et al 1997 Rabbit NR 2500~3000 12(6/6) P 0.5/0.5 NR i.v. XNJ 40 mL·kg−1(1d) MDA, GSH-Px, Note. XNJI is Xingnaojing injection; SD is Sprague-Dawley; W is Wistar; M is male; F is female; P is permanent; T is transient; i.p. is intraperitoneal injection; i.v. is intravenous injection; c.i.v. is caudal intravenous injection; NR is not report; Index isch/rep(h) is index ischemia and reperfusion in hours; - means no reperfusion; BE is brain edema; BBB is blood brain barrier; NDS is Neurological Deficit Score; CIA is cerebral infarction area; NCA is Neuronal cell apoptosis; TNF-α is brain tumor factor α; IL-6 is interleukin-6; IL-1β is interleukin-1β; SOD is superoxide dismutase; MDA is malondialdehyde; GSH-Px is glutathione peroxidase.


## 3.3. Methodological Quality

All studies were published in a peer-reviewed journal. Seven studies described the temperature control [13, 29, 30, 32, 33, 37, 39]; eighteen studies described random allocation [13, 16, 20–24, 27–30, 32–36, 38, 40], and four studies reported the random sequence was gene rated by a random number table [29–31, 33]. None of the studies used either allocation concealment or blinded assessment of outcome. As for the use of anesthetics, chloral hydrate was used as anesthetic in nine studies [13, 20–22, 29–31, 33, 38], pentobarbital sodium was used as anesthetic in three studies [16, 32, 40], ethyl ether was used as anesthetic in two studies [23, 39], and isomo pentobarbital sodium, ethyl carbamate, and thiophene sodium were used as anesthetic in one studies, respectively [28, 36, 41]. Six articles did not report the detail of anesthetics [17, 24, 27, 34, 35, 37]. One study chooses rats with hypertensive [32], and others choose the healthy mouse, rats, or rabbits. Fifteen studies described a sample size calculation [16, 17, 20, 21, 24, 27–31, 33, 34, 36, 40, 41]. And, no studies reported compliance with animal welfare regulations or a statement of potential conflict of interests. Details of each experiment are shown in Table 2.Table 2
Quality assessment of included studies.
Study (year) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) score Yan et al. 2017 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Li et al. 2016 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Chen et al. 2015 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Wu 2015 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Zhong et al. 2015 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Huang et al. 2014 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Ma 2014 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 5 Zeng 2013 √ √ √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 6 Zhu 2012 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Huang 2012 √ √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Li and Xie 2011 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Guo et al. 2010 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ UN UN UN 3 Wu 2007 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Zhang et al. 2006 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Lu 2006 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Shen et al. 2004 √ √ UN UN UN UN √ UN UN UN 3 Wang et al. 2004 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Zhou et al. 2002 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Wan et al. 2001 √ √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN UN 4 Cai et al. 2000 √ UN √ UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 5 Fu et al. 2000 √ UN √ UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 4 Chen et al. 2000 √ UN UN UN UN UN √ √ UN UN 3 Zhang et al. 1997 √ UN UN UN UN √ √ √ UN UN 4 Note: (1) publication in a peer-reviewed journal; (2) statement of temperature control;(3) random allocation to groups; (4) allocation concealment; (5)blinded assessment of outcome; (6) use of anesthetic without significant internal protection of blood vessel; (7) appropriate animal model (aged, healthy, diabetic, or hypertensive); (8) sample size calculation; (9) compliance with animal welfare regulations; (10) statement of potential conflict of interests. UN is unclear.


## 4. Effect of Interventions on Cerebral Ischemia

### 4.1. Primary Outcome Measures

#### 4.1.1. Neurological Deficit Score

Neurological deficit score was measured in seven studies with 120 animals. Significant heterogeneity occurred in index of neurological deficit score (P< 0.00001,I2 = 93%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of neurological deficit score was −1.25 (−1.92, −0.58), indicating that XNJI could significantly reduce the neurological deficit score compared with control group (P=0.0002) (Figure 3(a)). Subgroup analysis showed that XNJI got a remarkable effect on the models of ischemia-reperfusion [n=76, −1.35 (−2.36, −0.34),P=0.009] compared to permanent ischemia [n=44, −1.08 (−1.66, −0.51),P=0.0002] (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
Forest plot of comparison: (a) neurological deficit score; (b) subgroup of XNJI on transient and permanent ischemia;I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b)


#### 4.1.2. Cerebral Infarction Area, Brain Edema, and Neuronal Cell Apoptosis

Cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were measured in six studies [13, 21, 24, 33, 34, 37], four studies [16, 20, 24, 29], and six studies [21, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35] with 96, 145, and 106 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity appeared in cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 93%;P = 0.004,I2 = 78%,P< 0.00001,I2 = 96%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were −14.98 (−21.36, −8.59) (Figure 4(a)), −4.64 (−5.38, −3.90) (Figure 4(b)), −12.21 (−18.05, −6.37) (Figure 4(c)). The pooled analysis indicated that the cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and the neuronal cell apoptosis could significantly alleviated by using XNJI compared with control group(P< 0.00001,P< 0.00001, andP< 0.0001).Figure 4
Forest plot of comparison: (a) cerebral infarction area; (b) brain edema; (c) neuronal cell apoptosis.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


### 4.2. Second Outcome Measures

#### 4.2.1. Inflammatory Factor

The effect of XNJI on TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β is summarized in Figure 5. Serum TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β level were measured in four [13, 16, 29, 34], three [13, 17, 34], and two articles [17, 34] with 107, 56, and 32 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity represented in index of TNF-α and IL-1β (P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%,P < 0.00001,I2= 99%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI andP of TNF-α and IL-1β was −4.13 (−6.68, −1.58),P= 0.001; −228.69 (−586.20, −128.83),P= 0.21 (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). In addition, there were two experiments which assessed the changes in IL-1β. There is no heterogeneity displayed in the meta-analyses of IL-6 (P = 0.77,I2 = 0%). Based on the statistical meta-analysis of fixed effect model, the MD with 95%CI andP of IL-6 was −119.23 (−138.04, −100.43),P <0.00001(Figure 5(b)). It demonstrated that XNJI could alleviate cerebral ischemia injury by inhabiting inflammatory factor in vivo significantly.Figure 5
Forest plot of comparison: (a) TNF-α; (b) IL-6; (c) IL-1β.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


#### 4.2.2. Antioxidant Level

SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA level, the direct index of oxidation system of the body, were measured in five [22, 23, 35, 36, 38], three [32, 38, 39], and six articles [22, 23, 32, 35, 36, 41] with 77, 43, and 86 animals, respectively. Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed in all the three meta-analysis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 96%;P < 0.00001,I2= 92%;P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%). The MD with 95%CI of SOD (Figure 6(a)), GSH-Px (Figure 6(b)), and MDA (Figure 6(c)) was 53.02 (20.25, 85.78), 8.65 (1.77, 15.54), and −4.16 (−5.50, −2.82), respectively. It indicated that the XNJI could significantly increase the level of SOD, GSH-Px and decrease the level of MDA (P = 0.002,P = 0.01,P < 0.00001).Figure 6
Forest plot of comparison: (a) SOD; (b) GSH-Px; (c) MDA.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 4.1. Primary Outcome Measures

### 4.1.1. Neurological Deficit Score

Neurological deficit score was measured in seven studies with 120 animals. Significant heterogeneity occurred in index of neurological deficit score (P< 0.00001,I2 = 93%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of neurological deficit score was −1.25 (−1.92, −0.58), indicating that XNJI could significantly reduce the neurological deficit score compared with control group (P=0.0002) (Figure 3(a)). Subgroup analysis showed that XNJI got a remarkable effect on the models of ischemia-reperfusion [n=76, −1.35 (−2.36, −0.34),P=0.009] compared to permanent ischemia [n=44, −1.08 (−1.66, −0.51),P=0.0002] (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
Forest plot of comparison: (a) neurological deficit score; (b) subgroup of XNJI on transient and permanent ischemia;I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b)


### 4.1.2. Cerebral Infarction Area, Brain Edema, and Neuronal Cell Apoptosis

Cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were measured in six studies [13, 21, 24, 33, 34, 37], four studies [16, 20, 24, 29], and six studies [21, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35] with 96, 145, and 106 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity appeared in cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 93%;P = 0.004,I2 = 78%,P< 0.00001,I2 = 96%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were −14.98 (−21.36, −8.59) (Figure 4(a)), −4.64 (−5.38, −3.90) (Figure 4(b)), −12.21 (−18.05, −6.37) (Figure 4(c)). The pooled analysis indicated that the cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and the neuronal cell apoptosis could significantly alleviated by using XNJI compared with control group(P< 0.00001,P< 0.00001, andP< 0.0001).Figure 4
Forest plot of comparison: (a) cerebral infarction area; (b) brain edema; (c) neuronal cell apoptosis.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 4.1.1. Neurological Deficit Score

Neurological deficit score was measured in seven studies with 120 animals. Significant heterogeneity occurred in index of neurological deficit score (P< 0.00001,I2 = 93%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of neurological deficit score was −1.25 (−1.92, −0.58), indicating that XNJI could significantly reduce the neurological deficit score compared with control group (P=0.0002) (Figure 3(a)). Subgroup analysis showed that XNJI got a remarkable effect on the models of ischemia-reperfusion [n=76, −1.35 (−2.36, −0.34),P=0.009] compared to permanent ischemia [n=44, −1.08 (−1.66, −0.51),P=0.0002] (Figure 3(b)).Figure 3
Forest plot of comparison: (a) neurological deficit score; (b) subgroup of XNJI on transient and permanent ischemia;I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b)


## 4.1.2. Cerebral Infarction Area, Brain Edema, and Neuronal Cell Apoptosis

Cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were measured in six studies [13, 21, 24, 33, 34, 37], four studies [16, 20, 24, 29], and six studies [21, 22, 24, 27, 33, 35] with 96, 145, and 106 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity appeared in cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 93%;P = 0.004,I2 = 78%,P< 0.00001,I2 = 96%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI of cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis were −14.98 (−21.36, −8.59) (Figure 4(a)), −4.64 (−5.38, −3.90) (Figure 4(b)), −12.21 (−18.05, −6.37) (Figure 4(c)). The pooled analysis indicated that the cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and the neuronal cell apoptosis could significantly alleviated by using XNJI compared with control group(P< 0.00001,P< 0.00001, andP< 0.0001).Figure 4
Forest plot of comparison: (a) cerebral infarction area; (b) brain edema; (c) neuronal cell apoptosis.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 4.2. Second Outcome Measures

### 4.2.1. Inflammatory Factor

The effect of XNJI on TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β is summarized in Figure 5. Serum TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β level were measured in four [13, 16, 29, 34], three [13, 17, 34], and two articles [17, 34] with 107, 56, and 32 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity represented in index of TNF-α and IL-1β (P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%,P < 0.00001,I2= 99%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI andP of TNF-α and IL-1β was −4.13 (−6.68, −1.58),P= 0.001; −228.69 (−586.20, −128.83),P= 0.21 (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). In addition, there were two experiments which assessed the changes in IL-1β. There is no heterogeneity displayed in the meta-analyses of IL-6 (P = 0.77,I2 = 0%). Based on the statistical meta-analysis of fixed effect model, the MD with 95%CI andP of IL-6 was −119.23 (−138.04, −100.43),P <0.00001(Figure 5(b)). It demonstrated that XNJI could alleviate cerebral ischemia injury by inhabiting inflammatory factor in vivo significantly.Figure 5
Forest plot of comparison: (a) TNF-α; (b) IL-6; (c) IL-1β.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


### 4.2.2. Antioxidant Level

SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA level, the direct index of oxidation system of the body, were measured in five [22, 23, 35, 36, 38], three [32, 38, 39], and six articles [22, 23, 32, 35, 36, 41] with 77, 43, and 86 animals, respectively. Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed in all the three meta-analysis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 96%;P < 0.00001,I2= 92%;P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%). The MD with 95%CI of SOD (Figure 6(a)), GSH-Px (Figure 6(b)), and MDA (Figure 6(c)) was 53.02 (20.25, 85.78), 8.65 (1.77, 15.54), and −4.16 (−5.50, −2.82), respectively. It indicated that the XNJI could significantly increase the level of SOD, GSH-Px and decrease the level of MDA (P = 0.002,P = 0.01,P < 0.00001).Figure 6
Forest plot of comparison: (a) SOD; (b) GSH-Px; (c) MDA.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 4.2.1. Inflammatory Factor

The effect of XNJI on TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β is summarized in Figure 5. Serum TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β level were measured in four [13, 16, 29, 34], three [13, 17, 34], and two articles [17, 34] with 107, 56, and 32 animals, respectively. Significant heterogeneity represented in index of TNF-α and IL-1β (P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%,P < 0.00001,I2= 99%). Therefore, random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis. The MD with 95%CI andP of TNF-α and IL-1β was −4.13 (−6.68, −1.58),P= 0.001; −228.69 (−586.20, −128.83),P= 0.21 (Figures 5(a) and 5(c)). In addition, there were two experiments which assessed the changes in IL-1β. There is no heterogeneity displayed in the meta-analyses of IL-6 (P = 0.77,I2 = 0%). Based on the statistical meta-analysis of fixed effect model, the MD with 95%CI andP of IL-6 was −119.23 (−138.04, −100.43),P <0.00001(Figure 5(b)). It demonstrated that XNJI could alleviate cerebral ischemia injury by inhabiting inflammatory factor in vivo significantly.Figure 5
Forest plot of comparison: (a) TNF-α; (b) IL-6; (c) IL-1β.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 4.2.2. Antioxidant Level

SOD, GSH-Px, and MDA level, the direct index of oxidation system of the body, were measured in five [22, 23, 35, 36, 38], three [32, 38, 39], and six articles [22, 23, 32, 35, 36, 41] with 77, 43, and 86 animals, respectively. Significant statistical heterogeneity was observed in all the three meta-analysis (P < 0.00001,I2 = 96%;P < 0.00001,I2= 92%;P < 0.00001,I2 = 98%). The MD with 95%CI of SOD (Figure 6(a)), GSH-Px (Figure 6(b)), and MDA (Figure 6(c)) was 53.02 (20.25, 85.78), 8.65 (1.77, 15.54), and −4.16 (−5.50, −2.82), respectively. It indicated that the XNJI could significantly increase the level of SOD, GSH-Px and decrease the level of MDA (P = 0.002,P = 0.01,P < 0.00001).Figure 6
Forest plot of comparison: (a) SOD; (b) GSH-Px; (c) MDA.I2 andP are the criterion for the heterogeneity test, ◆ pooled mean difference, —■— mean difference, and 95%CI.
(a) (b) (c)


## 5. Discussion

### 5.1. Preclinical Evidence and Mechanism of Xingnaojing Injection for Cerebral Ischemia

The rapid development of modern technology makes many oral formulations of Chinese medicine developing as injections to meet the needs of modern medicine. XNJI is refined based on the traditional Chinese prescription named An Gong Niu Huang pills [42], which is widely applied in clinic for a variety of coma and cerebrovascular accident patients [43, 44]. It could alleviate quickly and effectively the clinical symptoms of cerebral ischemia such as hemiplegia, partial body sensory disorder, aphasia vomiting, and ataxia [45].The pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion is a rapid cascade reaction. The accumulation of inflammatory cytokines in ischemia tissue is an important factor to aggravate cerebral ischemia and hypoxia. When cerebral ischemia-reperfusion occurs, cerebrovascular endothelial cells are activated. Meanwhile, platelets and immune cells release a large number of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-ɑ, IL-6, IL-1β, PAF (platelet activating factor), and complement activation products substance. TNF-ɑ is a vital role in the inflammatory network of cytokines and is considered as the trigger medium of a systemic inflammatory reaction [46]. It can directly inhibit vascular endothelial cell function, increase vascular permeability, decrease circulatory resistance, and induce cytokines and adhesion molecules release like the waterfall, resulting in inflammatory damage cascade amplification effect, finally, resulting in wall thickening, stenosis, and cerebral infraction [21, 22]. Through the meta-analysis, we found XNJI had significant anti-inflammatory effect. Compared with control group, the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β levels of XNJI group were lower by 4.13, 119.23, and 228.69 ng/L (Figure 5). In addition, the results showed that theI2 value of IL-6 was 0%, suggesting a relatively reliable therapy.Oxidative stress is another reaction after cerebral ischemia, and the function of free radical scavenging system in the body decreased during cerebral ischemia. The endogenous antioxidant systems are unbalanced and produced large amounts of free radicals, leading to the peroxidation of lipid, protein and nucleic acid, and the biochemical alteration (SOD ↓, GSH-Px ↓, and MDA↑), and further led to BBB disruption with secondary vasogenic edema, activation of apoptosis, and brain infarction [47, 48]. Therefore, the production and release of oxygen free radicals are the key steps that cause cerebral injury. Scavenging oxygen free radicals is an important way to treat cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. In theory, block oxidative stress or act on the key molecules could reduce cerebral ischemia-reperfusion induced oxidative damage. Our data provide evidence that XNJI could improve the body's antioxidant function after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (Figure 6), suggesting that XNJI may reduce the damage of cerebral ischemia by regulating inflammatory and oxidative stress.The important outcomes of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury are neurological deficit score, cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis. Inflammatory, oxidative stress, and destroyed BBB could be cause and effect by each other and lead to cerebral edema, cell necrosis and activation of apoptosis [49], and brain infarction, which were manifested as neurological dysfunction in clinic [9]. In the animal experiment, it was tested by neurological deficit score. STAIR (2009) states that [50] multiple indicators should be selected in the study of cerebral ischemia drugs, which should include infarction area and neurological function; this emphasized the importance of behavioral outcomes due to its close relationship to late survival rate clinically. Functional recovery of clinical stroke patients is a major endpoint indicator [51, 52]. Evidence showed the beneficial of XNJI on neurological function (Figure 3) and cerebral infarction area (Figure 4(a)), which is consistent with clinical reports [25]. At the same time, subgroup analysis showed that XNJI had a better effect on the model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury than the model of permanent cerebral ischemia. However, the heterogeneity still existed that may be related to different dose and duration of XNJI. Additionally, there were a study which had reported that XNJI have a significant effect on ultrastructural of brain when ischemia-reperfusion [17] and three studies reported the alleviation of XNJI on BBB damage [20, 29, 34]; however, we did not conduct a meta-analysis due to its quantitative limitations. The destruction of BBB plays an extremely important role in the process of cerebral ischemia. It is the destruction of BBB that causes the originally innocuous substance into the brain tissue to become harmful substances. Therefore, it is recommended that the BBB research should make a consideration in the further. Moreover, most of the studies included in this study are preventive one-time administration; however, cerebral ischemic stroke is mostly treated with XNJI after onset for one week, clinically. Therefore, it is recommended that study with therapeutic administration and longer administration may be considered in the further.


### 5.2. Strength

Preclinical efficacy experiments are typically cited to justify the initiation of clinical trials. Our findings contribute to the literature on preclinical design and reinforce our exploratory analysis for the mechanism of XNJI against cerebral ischemia. Moreover, they could eliminate unnecessary repetitive tests and contribute to further study in animal experiments to increase the likelihood of success in future clinical trials. Furthermore, as a traditional Chinese medicine, XNJI is a relatively safe drug. Therefore, it may play a potentially greater role in clinical practice in the future.


### 5.3. Limitations

The average quality score of studies was 4.5. Many studies have failed to describe their methods in detail, such as randomized trials, blind evaluation of results, and assignment of hidden. Therefore, we recommend that all research published in China should follow a guideline similar to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for clinical studies [53]. These strategies will promote the identification and use of many TCPM (e.g., XNJI) outside China.In addition, there are some deviations caused by the following reasons: first, different animal species, drug dose, duration of administration, and method of administration resulted in some deviation. Second, animal models used in most studies are healthy; however, patients with cerebral ischemia are often associated with diabetes, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, and the like. Third, our search strategy includes only Chinese and English databases, leading to certain deviations. Thus, the results should be interpreted with caution.


## 5.1. Preclinical Evidence and Mechanism of Xingnaojing Injection for Cerebral Ischemia

The rapid development of modern technology makes many oral formulations of Chinese medicine developing as injections to meet the needs of modern medicine. XNJI is refined based on the traditional Chinese prescription named An Gong Niu Huang pills [42], which is widely applied in clinic for a variety of coma and cerebrovascular accident patients [43, 44]. It could alleviate quickly and effectively the clinical symptoms of cerebral ischemia such as hemiplegia, partial body sensory disorder, aphasia vomiting, and ataxia [45].The pathogenesis of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion is a rapid cascade reaction. The accumulation of inflammatory cytokines in ischemia tissue is an important factor to aggravate cerebral ischemia and hypoxia. When cerebral ischemia-reperfusion occurs, cerebrovascular endothelial cells are activated. Meanwhile, platelets and immune cells release a large number of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-ɑ, IL-6, IL-1β, PAF (platelet activating factor), and complement activation products substance. TNF-ɑ is a vital role in the inflammatory network of cytokines and is considered as the trigger medium of a systemic inflammatory reaction [46]. It can directly inhibit vascular endothelial cell function, increase vascular permeability, decrease circulatory resistance, and induce cytokines and adhesion molecules release like the waterfall, resulting in inflammatory damage cascade amplification effect, finally, resulting in wall thickening, stenosis, and cerebral infraction [21, 22]. Through the meta-analysis, we found XNJI had significant anti-inflammatory effect. Compared with control group, the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β levels of XNJI group were lower by 4.13, 119.23, and 228.69 ng/L (Figure 5). In addition, the results showed that theI2 value of IL-6 was 0%, suggesting a relatively reliable therapy.Oxidative stress is another reaction after cerebral ischemia, and the function of free radical scavenging system in the body decreased during cerebral ischemia. The endogenous antioxidant systems are unbalanced and produced large amounts of free radicals, leading to the peroxidation of lipid, protein and nucleic acid, and the biochemical alteration (SOD ↓, GSH-Px ↓, and MDA↑), and further led to BBB disruption with secondary vasogenic edema, activation of apoptosis, and brain infarction [47, 48]. Therefore, the production and release of oxygen free radicals are the key steps that cause cerebral injury. Scavenging oxygen free radicals is an important way to treat cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. In theory, block oxidative stress or act on the key molecules could reduce cerebral ischemia-reperfusion induced oxidative damage. Our data provide evidence that XNJI could improve the body's antioxidant function after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion (Figure 6), suggesting that XNJI may reduce the damage of cerebral ischemia by regulating inflammatory and oxidative stress.The important outcomes of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion injury are neurological deficit score, cerebral infarction area, brain edema, and neuronal cell apoptosis. Inflammatory, oxidative stress, and destroyed BBB could be cause and effect by each other and lead to cerebral edema, cell necrosis and activation of apoptosis [49], and brain infarction, which were manifested as neurological dysfunction in clinic [9]. In the animal experiment, it was tested by neurological deficit score. STAIR (2009) states that [50] multiple indicators should be selected in the study of cerebral ischemia drugs, which should include infarction area and neurological function; this emphasized the importance of behavioral outcomes due to its close relationship to late survival rate clinically. Functional recovery of clinical stroke patients is a major endpoint indicator [51, 52]. Evidence showed the beneficial of XNJI on neurological function (Figure 3) and cerebral infarction area (Figure 4(a)), which is consistent with clinical reports [25]. At the same time, subgroup analysis showed that XNJI had a better effect on the model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury than the model of permanent cerebral ischemia. However, the heterogeneity still existed that may be related to different dose and duration of XNJI. Additionally, there were a study which had reported that XNJI have a significant effect on ultrastructural of brain when ischemia-reperfusion [17] and three studies reported the alleviation of XNJI on BBB damage [20, 29, 34]; however, we did not conduct a meta-analysis due to its quantitative limitations. The destruction of BBB plays an extremely important role in the process of cerebral ischemia. It is the destruction of BBB that causes the originally innocuous substance into the brain tissue to become harmful substances. Therefore, it is recommended that the BBB research should make a consideration in the further. Moreover, most of the studies included in this study are preventive one-time administration; however, cerebral ischemic stroke is mostly treated with XNJI after onset for one week, clinically. Therefore, it is recommended that study with therapeutic administration and longer administration may be considered in the further.


## 5.2. Strength

Preclinical efficacy experiments are typically cited to justify the initiation of clinical trials. Our findings contribute to the literature on preclinical design and reinforce our exploratory analysis for the mechanism of XNJI against cerebral ischemia. Moreover, they could eliminate unnecessary repetitive tests and contribute to further study in animal experiments to increase the likelihood of success in future clinical trials. Furthermore, as a traditional Chinese medicine, XNJI is a relatively safe drug. Therefore, it may play a potentially greater role in clinical practice in the future.


## 5.3. Limitations

The average quality score of studies was 4.5. Many studies have failed to describe their methods in detail, such as randomized trials, blind evaluation of results, and assignment of hidden. Therefore, we recommend that all research published in China should follow a guideline similar to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement for clinical studies [53]. These strategies will promote the identification and use of many TCPM (e.g., XNJI) outside China.In addition, there are some deviations caused by the following reasons: first, different animal species, drug dose, duration of administration, and method of administration resulted in some deviation. Second, animal models used in most studies are healthy; however, patients with cerebral ischemia are often associated with diabetes, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, and the like. Third, our search strategy includes only Chinese and English databases, leading to certain deviations. Thus, the results should be interpreted with caution.


## 6. Conclusions

Based on the results of this meta-analysis, the effect of XNJI on cerebral ischemia is encouraging. XNJI may be a promising method to alleviate ischemia-induced brain damage by regulating oxidative stress and inflammatory reaction. Considering being accepted far and wide by practitioners, the experiments with more rigorous experimental design and stronger quality control are required.



---

*Source: 9624175-2018-11-15.xml*