# Natal and Neonatal Teeth: An Overview of the Literature

Authors: Shubhangi Mhaske; Monal B. Yuwanati; Ashok Mhaske; Raju Ragavendra; Kavitha Kamath; Swati Saawarn
Journal: ISRN Pediatrics
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

The occurrence of natal and neonatal teeth is an uncommon anomaly, which for centuries has been associated with diverse superstitions among different ethnic groups. Natal teeth are more frequent than neonatal teeth, with the ratio being approximately 3 : 1. It must be considered that natal and neonatal teeth are conditions of fundamental importance not only for a dental surgeon but also for a paediatrician since their presence may lead to numerous complications. Early detection and treatment of these teeth are recommended because they may induce deformity or mutilation of tongue, dehydration, inadequate nutrients intake by the infant, and growth retardation, the pattern and time of eruption of teeth and its morphology. This paper presents a concise review of the literature about neonatal teeth.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Natal teeth are teeth present at birth, and “neonatal teeth” are teeth erupted within the first month of life. Premature eruption of a tooth at the time of birth or too early is combined with many misconceptions. They are further accompanied by various difficulties, such as pain on suckling and refusal to feed, faced by the mother and the child due to the natal tooth/teeth.  Some families are so superstitious that the afflicted child may be deprived of parental love. The family hopes that the offending teeth be removed as soon as possible.Natal and neonatal teeth have been a subject of curiosity and study since the time it was first documented by Titus Livius, in 59 BC. Gaius Plinius Secundus (the Elder), in 23 BC, believed that a splendid future awaited male infants with natal teeth. In some countries, the child is considered to be monstrous and bearer of misfortune for example.  As per  Chinese tradition it is considered as a bad omen for girls [1].


## 2. Terminology and Synonyms

Dentitia praecox, dens connatalis, congenital teeth, fetal teeth, infancy teeth, predeciduous teeth, and precocious dentition are some of the terminologies used previously [1, 9, 12, 21, 65]. Lack of specificity and accuracy in description of the condition leads to subsequent discontinuity of these terms. The analogous terms of “natal” and “neonatal” teeth described by Massler and Savara are now most accepted [4]. These terms broadly describe the teeth that are erupted at birth or shortly thereafter. Although these terms only define the time of eruption and give no hint whether the tooth is a component of primary dentition or whether it is supernumerary, newer synonyms should be explored.


## 3. Proposed Classifications

The natal and neonatal teeth that do not confirm the criteria described for them and erupt within one to three and a half months are calledearly infancy teeth [66]. Few authors have tried to resolve the controversies in such cases. Spouge and Feasby [66] in 1966 classified, the natal & neonatal tooth on the basis of developmental stages whereas, Hebling et al. in 1997 classified according to the appearance of each natal tooth into the oral cavity [67, 68] (Table 1).Table 1
Prevalence of neonatal and natal teeth in different populations and studies.
Authors
Prevalence
Number of children in the sample
Magitot, 1876  [2]
1 : 6000
17,578
Puech, 1876
1 : 30000
60,000
Ballantyne, 1896 [3]
1 : 6000
17,578
Massler and Savara, 1950 [4]
1 : 2000
6,000
Allwright, 1958  [5]
1 : 3408
6,817
Bodenhoff, 1959  [6]
1 : 3000
—
Wong, 1962  [7]
1 : 3000
—
Bodenhoff and Gorlin, 1963 [8]
1 : 3000
—
Mayhall, 1967 [9]
1 : 1125
90
Chow, 1980  [10]
1 : 2000 to 3500
—
Anderson, 1982  [11]
1 : 800
—
Kates et al., 1984 [12]
1 : 3667
7,155
Leung, 1986  [13]
1 : 3392
50,892
Bedi and Yan, 1990  [14]
1 : 1442
—
Rusmah, 1991 [15]
1 : 2325
9,600
To, 1991 [16]
1 : 1118
53,678
De Almeida and Gomide,1996 [17]
1 : 21.6
1,019
Alaluusua et al.,* 2002 [18]
1 : 1000
34,457  (1997–2000)
El Khatib et al., 2005 [19]
1 : 3400
17000 (1984 and 2001)
*Exposed to toxin Finnish population-correlation with exposure to toxin and prevalence of neonatal teeth and natal teeth.


## 4. Incidence and Prevalence

Natal teeth are three times more common than neonatal teeth. The incidence of natal and neonatal teeth ranges from 1 : 2,000 to 1 : 3,500 [19, 23] (Table 2). The radiographic examination is essential to differentiate the premature eruption of a primary deciduous tooth from a supernumerary tooth [69]. Only 1% to 10% of natal and neonatal teeth are supernumerary. More than 90% of natal and neonatal teeth are prematurely erupted deciduous series of teeth, whereas less than 10% are supernumerary [17, 70, 71]. The supernumerary teeth should always be extracted, but the decision to extract a normal mature natal tooth should be done by taking into account local or general complications and parental opinion.Table 2
Review of natal and neonatal teeth cases reported in the literature.
Sr. number
Author
Sex
Age
Number of teeth
Teeth position and number
Macroscopic features
Chief symptoms/complaint
Treatment
(1)
Ruschel H Cet al., 2010 [20]
Male
14 days
1
Maxillary first molar right side
Calcified only at occlusal portion, no mobility
No complaint
Extraction
(2)
Deep et al.,2011 [21]
Female
22 days
1
Mandibular anterior
—
Ulceration over the ventral surface of tongue, no mobility, pain during sucking and feeding
Grinding and placement of composite over the teeth
(3)
Nandikonda, 2010 [22]
Female
10 days
2
Maxilla
Whitish opaque in color with a size similar to mandibular anterior region, crown portion was noted without any root structures
Cleft palate, causing feeding difficulty to the baby
Extraction
(4)
Dyment et al., 2005 [23]
Female
3 days
2
71 and 81
The teeth did not appear to be excessively mobile
Feeding without difficulty
Extraction
(5)
Shrestha, 2011 [24]
Female infant
12 days
2
Mandible, anterior teeth
Two teeth in the lower jaw since birth, whitish opaque in color and exhibiting grade III mobility
Mother complaining of pain on suckling and refusal to suck milk
Extraction
(6)
Chandra, 2011 [25]
Male
5 days
2
71, 81 mandibular anterior (natal)
Mobile, whitish opaque
Discomfort in feeding
Extraction
Female
18 days
1
81 (neonatal)
Mobile, whitish opaque
Difficulty in breast feeding
Extraction
Female
7 days
1
81 (natal)
Mobile, whitish opaque
Difficulty in breast feeding
Extraction
(7)
Female gender
6 hours
2
Primary central incisors (71 and 81) with
Root formation
Two injuries cyst (swelling small tissue soft/small nodule diameter 1 mm color translucent white) at the central region of the jaw
—
Female
48 hours
2
—
Ulcer on the tongueFeeding difficulty
Extraction
Gina et al.,2008 [26]
Male
9 days
1
Maxillary 51
—
(Small swelling of soft tissue/pellet 1 mm diameter small whitish translucent) at the central region of the mandibleno uncomfortable and fed showed no complication (breastfeeding)
—
Male
3 months
1
81 incisors
Appearance hypoplastic or hypomineralized (milky white ||)Mobility grade type II, there was no associated injury
—
Periodic inspections and recommendations to the mother in relation to the hygiene and eating habits
Female
5 months
1
71 mandibular incisors
—
—
Extraction
(8)
Marakoglu et al., 2004 [27]
Male
Stillborn
2
Two maxillary first incisors
—
—
—
(9)
Kaur et al.,2003 [28]
Male
4 months
1
—
—
Ulcer on ventral surface of tongue
Conservative t/t
(10)
Ndiokwelu et al., 2004 [29]
Female
4 days
1
Upper and lower teeth
—
Associated with Down syndrome
(11)
Martinez,2003 [30]
—
2 months
2
71, 81
Small root, hypoplastic enamel
Tooth mobility
Extraction
(12)
Rdos et al.,2011 [31]
Male
—
11
—
—
—
Prosthetic rehabilitation
(13)
Agostini et al., 2008 [32]
Male
4 months
2
71, 81
—
Nodular growth after exfoliation of teeth
—
(14)
Tomaki, et al.,2005 [33]
Male
27 days
1
81
Milky white and the other half yellowish brown with incomplete tooth crown-like hard tissue
Mobile mass with tooth-like hard tissue
Extraction
(15)
J. Kovac and D. Kovac, 2011 [34]
Female
5 weeks
2
71, 81
Hypoplastic
—
Extraction
(16)
Sibert and Porteous,1974 [35]
Female (6)
3 days–6 months
8
71, 81
—
—
Extraction
(17)
Bartholin*
—
2 molars
—
—
—
—
(18)
Thomas*
—
—
8 incisors1 molar
—
—
—
—
(19)
Bouchet*
—
—
2 mandibular incisors1 mandibular molar
—
—
—
—
(20)
Jacobi*
—
—
1 max molar1 mandibular molar2 mandibular incisors
—
—
—
—
(21)
Kaufman*
—
—
4 mand molars4 max molars
—
—
—
—
(22)
M lin*
—
—
2 molars
(23)
Oriola*
—
—
2 mand molars
—
—
—
—
(24)
Allwright*
—
—
2 mand molars
—
—
—
—
(25)
Bodenhoff*
—
—
2 inciosrs4 mand molars4 max molars (1, 2nd)
—
—
—
—
(26)
Wong*
—
—
4 inciosrs2 mand molars2 max molars (1st)
—
—
—
—
(27)
Soni*
—
—
1 mand molar (1st)
—
—
—
—
(28)
Tay*
—
—
1 max molar (2nd)
(29)
Bernick*
—
—
1 max molar (1st)
—
—
—
—
(30)
Ajagebe*
—
—
1 mand molar (2nd)
—
—
—
—
(31)
Anderson*
—
—
2 max molars (1st)
—
—
—
—
(32)
Ronk*
—
—
multiple incisors and molars
—
—
—
—
(33)
Primo et al.,1995 [36]
Female
6 months
2
71, 81
Two dental structures in which the incisor borders had no enamel and had exposed dentin. Mobility
The child cried during feeding, indicating pain and bleeding around two erupted teeth
Extraction
(34)
Basavanthappa et al., 2011 [37]
Female
15 days
1
81
Mobile, yellowish color, enamel hypoplasia
Difficulty in suckling
Extraction
Female
19 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Difficulty in suckling
Extraction
Male
16 days
1
51
Mobile, white color
Cleft lip and palate
Extraction
Female
14 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Sublingual ulceration
Extraction
Male
8 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
Female
18 days
1
71
Mobile, white color
Refusal to suck
Extraction
Female
30 days
2
71, 81
Mobile, gingival inflammation
Refusal to suck, gingival inflammation
Extraction
Male
25 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
Male
18 days
1
71
Mobile, white color
Sublingual ulceration
Extraction
Female
17 days
1
71
Mobile, white color
Refusal to suck
Extraction
Male
23 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Refusal to suck
Extraction
Female
21
1
71
Mobile, white color
Refusal to suck
Extraction
Male
7 days
1
81
Mobile, yellowish color
Difficulty in suckling
Extraction
Male
20 days
1
81
Mobile, white color
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
Female
21 days
1
71
Mobile, white color
Refusal to suck
Extraction
(35)
McDonald et al., 2004 [38]
Female
—
2
71, 81
Small, opaque, yellow, dysmorphic crowns
No difficulty to mother and child
Extraction (at age of 7 years)
(36)
Friend et al., 1991 [39]
Male
2 days
1 molar
54
A pale, globular tooth-like structure on the maxillary left alveolar ridge, rootless, mobile
—
Extraction
(37)
Kurian et al., 2007 [40]
Female
—
—
—
—
—
—
(38)
Taghi and Motamedi, 2009 [41]
Male
8 months
Mandibular incisor
—
—
Ulceration over ventral surface of tounge, difficulty in feeding
Grinding and placment of composite over the teeth
(39)
Sogi et al.,2011 [42]
Female
21 days
3 maxillary incisors
51, 61, 62
Mobile
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
(40)
Venkatesh and Adhisivam, 2011 [43]
Female
3 months
2
71, 81
Yellowish with conical edges
Congenital hyperthyroidism, associated symptoms
Extraction
(41)
Roshan et al.,2009 [44]
—
2
2
51, 61
—
Hyper-IgE syndrome
—
(42)
Veena et al.,2011 [45]
Female
2 weeks
2
71, 81
—
Ellis van Creveld syndrome
Exfoliated
(43)
Rao et al.,2001 [46]
Female
25 days
2
71, 81
Whitish opaque in colour, mobility. The crown size was normal with no roots. Hypomineralized
Ulcer over ventral surface of tongue
Extraction
(44)
Anegundi et al., 2002 [47].
Female
30 days
1
71
Mobile, whitish opaque in colour
Localized inflammation, difficulty in feeding
Extracted
Female
7 days
2
71, 81
Mobile, small yellowish brown in color
Difficulty in feeding
Extracted
Male
10 days
2
74, 84
Mobile
Difficulty in feeding
Extracted
Female
5 days
2
71, 81
Mobile, small, conical, yellowish brown, opaque teeth
Difficulty in feeding and refusal to suck
Extracted
(45)
Singh et al.,2004 [48]
Male
4 and1/2 months
1
—
—
Pedunculated mass in relation to mandibular anterior tooth
Extraction
(46)
Ziai et al.,2005 [49]
Male
4 weeks
1 (premaxillary region-RT side)
—
—
Bilateral Cleft lip and palate, severe feeding difficulties and recurrent bleeding from movement of the loose tooth
Extraction
—
5 days
1 (premaxillary region-RT side)
—
—
Difficulty in fabrication of device
Extraction
(47)
Hegde, 2005 [50]
Female
28 days
2
71, 81
Mobile, whitish in color
Ulceration over tongue, difficulty in sucking
Extraction
(48)
S. Sarkar and S. Sarkar, 2007 [51]
Male
3 months
1
54
Rootless
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
(49)
Kumar et al.,2011 [52]
Female
3 months
3
54, 64, 65
Rootless
Early eruption and difficulty in feeding, crying
Exraction
(50)
Rao and Mathad, 2009 [53]
Female
2 days
2
71, 81
Whitish opaque in color, mobile
Difficulty in feeding and refusal to suck, crying
Extraction
(51)
Muraleekrishnan et al., 2011 [54]
Male
—
2
71, 81
—
—
Extraction
(52)
Masatomi et al., 1991 [55]
Male
18 months
Multiple
—
—
—
Extraction
(53)
Gonçalves et al., 1998 [56]
Male
1–6 days
12 (multiple)—8 in mandibular anterior region. 2 molars (max/mand)
—
Very little root formation
—
Extraction
(54)
Prabhakar et al., 2009 [57]
Female (twin)
1 month
11
71,81
Mobility
Difficulty in feeding and suckling, and also the mother experienced discomfort feeding them
Extraction
(55)
Agostini et al., 2008 [58]
Male
4 months
2
71, 81
—
Nodular growth
Exfoliated
(56)
Dubois et al., 2010 [59]
Male
6 months
2
71, 81
—
Ulcer over ventral surface of tongue
Extraction
(57)
Eley et al.,2010 [60]
Female
11 months
2
71, 81
—
Ulceration over tip of tongue
Extraction
(58)
Samadi et al.,2011 [61]
(59)
Slayton, 2000 [62]
Male
10 months
2
71, 81
—
Down syndrome
Smoothing of the incisal edge
(60)
Padmanabhanet al., 2010 [63]
Male
20 days
1
81
Large whitish lesion was observed on the undersurface of the tongue, difficulty in feeding
Neonatal tooth was smoothened to eliminate the sharp traumatizing edges followed by extraction teeth
*Data from 19 to 34 is adapted from [64].The most commonly occurs in the mandibular region of central incisors, followed by maxillary incisors, mandibular cuspids or molars, and maxillary cuspids or molars in descending order [23, 72] (Table 3). Natal or neonatal cuspids are extremely rare.Table 3
Details of our cases (total teeth).
Case number
Sex
Age
Teeth position and number
Macroscopic features
Chief symptoms/complaint
Treatment
1
Male
5 months
2 teeth (71 and 81) (neonatal)
Yellowish white. Partially formed root. Size as compared to normal deciduous central incisor, foramina
Neither the child nor the mother had any problem during breast feeding
Extraction
2
Male
3 days
2 teeth (71 and 81) (natal)
Yellowish white, smaller in size
Difficulty in feeding
Extraction
3
Male
2 months
2 teeth (71 and 81) (neonatal)
Yellowish white, open apical foramina, smaller in size
Pain and difficulty in feeding
ExtractionThere was no difference in prevalence between males and females. However, a predilection for female was cited by some authors. Anegundi et al. reported a 66% proportion for females against a 31% proportion for males [47].


## 5. Multifactorial Etiology

Exact etiology for the premature eruption or for appearance of natal and neonatal teeth is not known. In the past, neonatal teeth were merely considered cysts of the dental lamina of the newborn [67]. Normally they appear corniform, white in colour, composed of compact keratin, and projected above the alveolar ridge [73].It was also suggested that they occur due to inheritance as dominant autosomal trait. Endocrine disturbance resulting from pituitary, thyroid, and gonads also may be one of the key factors. Another hypothesis suggested is that excessive or increased resorption of overlying bone results in early eruption of the natal or neonatal teeth. Poor maternal health, endocrine disturbances, febrile episodes during pregnancy, and congenital syphilis are some of the contributing predisposing factors for the occurrence of natal and neonatal teeth suggested in the literature. However, according to Štamfelj et al. the occurrence of natal teeth associated with agenesis of their primary successors appears to be related to an accelerated or premature pattern of dental development rather than to superficial positioning of the tooth germs [74].


## 6. Environmental Predisposing Factors

Environmental factors could play an important role in eruption of neonatal teeth. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) seem to cause the eruption of natal teeth [74]. The only environmental factor that may be regarded as a causative factor of natal teeth is the toxic polyhalogenated aromatic hydrocarbons: PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs. They are among the most widespread environmental pollutants. They cross the placenta, and concentrations of PCDD/Fs in the adipose tissue of a newborn are correlated with those in mother’s milk.  The children with natal or neonatal teeth usually show other associated symptoms [38].


## 7. Syndromes Associated

Few syndromes are reported to be associated with natal teeth and neonatal teeth [8]. These syndromes include Ellis-Van Creveld (Chondroectodermal Dysplasia) [75], Pachyonychia Congenital (Jadassohn-Lewandowsky), Hallermann-Streiff (Oculomandibulodyscephaly with Hypotrichosis) [76], Rubinstein-Taybi, Steatocystoma Multiplex, Pierre-Robin, Cyclopia, Pallister-Hall, Short Rib-Polydactyly (type II), Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch (Neonatal Progeria), Cleft Lip and Palate, Pfeiffer, Ectodermal Dysplasia, Craniofacial Dysostosis, Multiple Steatocystoma, Sotos, Adrenogenital, Epidermolysis-Bullosa Simplex including Van der Woude, Down’s Syndrome [77], and  Walker-Warburg Syndromes [78].


## 8. Clinical Presentation

The natal teeth or neonatal teeth manifest usually with variable shape and size ranging from small, conical and may also resemble normal teeth. The appearance of these teeth is dependent on the degree of maturity, but most of the time they are loose, small, discoloured, and hypoplastic as in the cases presented here. They may show enamel hypoplasia/hypomineralization [79] and a small root formation suggestive of an immature nature.  The majority of natal teeth may exhibit a brown-yellowish-/whitish-opaque colour [12].They are attached to the oral mucosa in many instances as the root development is incomplete or defective. This leads to the mobility in teeth, with the risk of being swallowed or aspirated by the child. The mobility also may lead to degeneration of Hertwig’s sheath which is responsible for the formation of root, thus resulting in further incomplete root development and stabilization.Increase in mobility could also cause changes in the radicular part of teeth such as cervical dentin, pulp cavity, and cementum as well.


## 9. Histology

In a study of natal teeth, Hals [80] observed normal pulp tissue, except for the presence of inflammatory areas in some regions; moreover, Weil’s basal layer and the cell-rich zone were absent [81]. Histologically, the thin layer of enamel or in extremely rare conditions absence of the enamel layer may be seen [77]. The enamel hypoplasia could be attributed to the disturbance/variation in amelogenesis process which was due to premature exposure of the tooth to the oral cavity. This may cause metaplastic alteration of the epithelium of the normally columnar enamel to a stratified squamous [80].Dentino-enamal junction is not scalloped which similar to that found in deciduous teeth. Cervically dentin becomes atubular with spaces and enclosed cells [82]. Irregular dentinal tubules through the dentin along with calcospherites and predentin of various thicknesses could be present [33]. Atypical dentin was also observed in the natal/neonatal teeth which could have been the result due to the response to irritant stimulus from oral cavity.Developing teeth often had no cementum, and in those cases where acellular cementum could be observed it was thinner than normal.Pulp canal and pulp chamber become wider in most of the cases. Vascularised pulps along with few inflammatory cells were also reported [83].


## 10. Ultrastructure Findings

Jasmin and Clergeau-Guerithault [81] studied the surface topography of mandibular natal and neonatal incisors at the ultrastructural level using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). They observed that enamel of the teeth exhibited hypoplastic, depressed areas, and the incisal edge of natal tooth lacked enamel [81]. According to Uzamis et al., the thickness of enamel was around 280 microns compared to up to 1200 microns in normal teeth. This shows the retarded development of natal and neonatal teeth, because of incomplete mineralization at the time of birth [82].In one of such extensive studies on natal and neonatal teeth, Masatomi et al. [55] reported that enamel has a normal prism structure and mineralization except in few cases where the prism structure was absent in the cervical part of the enamel. They also noticed that the cervical and apical dentin was tubular, and in developing teeth the dentin in these regions changed to an irregularly formed hard tissue of osteodentin character, in which enclosed cells could be observed.


## 11. Complications

A major complication from natal/neonatal teeth is ulceration on the ventral surface of the tongue caused by the tooth’s sharp incisal edge. This condition is also known as Riga-Fede disease or syndrome [47]. Possibility of swallowing and aspiration which has already been described previously should also be one of the major concerns in complications. Other complications stated are injury to mother’s breast and inconvenience during suckling. The consequences seen with the teeth include carious lesions, pulp polyp, or premature eruption of successor teeth.


## 12. Conclusion

Natal and neonatal teeth diagnosis requires detailed case history accompanied by thorough clinical and radiographic examination of the infant.  It is important to rule out by radiographic examination whether they are components of normal dentition or supernumerary to decide the treatment plan. The clinician should also assess the risk of haemorrhage due to the hypoprothrombinemia commonly present in newborns.


## Classification

(i)
The appearance of each natal tooth in the oral cavity can be classified into four categories given as follows, as the teeth emerge in the oral cavity:
(1)
shell-shaped crown poorly fixed to the alveolus by the gingival tissue and absence of a root;
(2)
solid crown poorly fixed to the alveolus by the gingival tissue and little or no root;
(3)
eruption of the incisal margin of the crown through the gingival tissues;
(4)
edema of the gingival tissue with an unerupted but palpable tooth.
(ii)
Spoug and Feasby have suggested that, clinically, natal and neonatal teeth are further classified according to their degree of maturity.
(1)
A mature natal or neonatal tooth is the one which is nearly or fully developed and has relatively good prognosis for maintenance.
(2)
The term immature natal or neonatal teeth, on the other hand, implies a tooth with incomplete or substandard structure; it also implies a poor prognosis.
(iii)
If the degree of mobility is more than 2 mm, the natal teeth of category (1) or (2) usually need extraction.



---

*Source: 956269-2013-08-18.xml*