# Chemical Profiles and Antiobesity Effect of a Mixture ofAstragalus membranaceus and Lithospermum erythrorhizon Extract in High Fat Diet Fed Mice

Authors: Doo Jin Choi; Bo-Ram Choi; HaeJin Lee; Seong Cheol Kim; Dahye Yoon; Young-Seob Lee; Kyung-Sook Han; Sung-Bum Park; Geum-Soog Kim; Dae Young Lee
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2022)

---

## Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the antiobesity potential and synergistic effects of ALM16, a mixture ofAstragalus membranaceus (AM) and Lithospermum erythrorhizon (LE) extracts, in HFD-induced obese mice. C57BL/6 mice were fed a normal diet (ND), high-fat diet (HFD), HFD + AM, HFD + LE or HFD + ALM16 (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg) daily for 5 weeks. Compared to the ND group, HFD-fed mice showed significant increases in body weight, food efficiency ratio, weights of white adipose tissues, adipocytes size, liver weight, and hepatic steatosis grade. However, ALM16 significantly reduced those increases induced by HFD. Moreover, as compared to the HFD group, the ALM16 group significantly ameliorated serum levels of lipid profiles (TG, TC, HDL, and LDL), adipokines (leptin and adiponectin), and liver damage markers (AST and ALT levels). Notably, ALM16 was more effective than AM or LE alone and had a similar or more potent effect than Garcinia cambogia extracts, as a positive control, at the same dose. These results demonstrate that ALM16 synergistically exerts anti-obesity effects based on complementary interactions between each component. Also, metabolic profiling between each extract and the ALM16 was confirmed by UPLC-QTOF/MS, and the difference was confirmed by relative quantification.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Obesity is a multifactorial chronic disease characterized by an excess accumulation of fat in adipose tissue due to disturbing the balance between caloric intake and energy expenditure [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) standards classified the degree of obesity as a body mass index (BMI, weight in kg divided by height squared m2). Overweight is defined as having a BMI between 25 and 30 and obesity when BMI exceeds 30 [3]. The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically worldwide owing to lifestyle and diet changes and is rapidly becoming a major health problem. Obesity not only impacts the status of health itself, but it can also influence to the development of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [4, 5].Current therapeutic strategies for obesity are the administration of pharmacological agents including orlistat and sibutramine with the management of diet, exercise, and weight loss [6]. Anti-obesity drugs, mainly synthetic chemicals, are generally known that act as central appetite suppressants, digestion and absorption blockers, metabolic promoters, and obesity gene product inhibitors, however, administration in a long term can cause several adverse effects [7, 8]. For that reason, it is required to develop natural materials with few side effects for obesity management, and herbal medications and functional foods have garnered much attention as potential alternative treatments [9, 10]. Recently herbal medications and natural products, such as raw or extracted products isolated from plants, were reported that they may exert potential health benefits for the treatment of many chronic or complex diseases, including obesity [11]. These herbal products are commonly used as a combination of multiple herbs because they can mediate multi-targets and enhance efficacy or decrease side effects through complementary interactions among individual components [12, 13]. Therefore, extensive studies have been conducted to evaluate various combinations of medicinal herbs as alternative treatments for obesity [14, 15].Astragalus membranaceus (AM), called Hwangki in Korea, is one of the most popular medicinal herbs in traditional medicine in Asia and is extensively used to treat hypertension, diabetes, and many other medical symptoms [16, 17]. AM is well known that can exert various pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective and neuroprotective effects, containing bioactive constituents such as isoflavonoids, triterpene saponins, and some trace elements [18, 19].Lithospermum erythrorhizon (LE) is extensively used in traditional herbal medicine for the treatment of sore throat and burns, and in traditional distilled liquor, called Jindo Hongju, in Korea [20]. LE is known to contain various phytochemicals such as naphthoquinone pigments and phenolic compounds [21], and is reported to exert antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antidiabetic activities [22–24]. Numerous studies reported that AM and LE can exert synergistic actions when mixed with other herbs and can be potent complementary herbs [25, 26].Numerous components have been isolated and reported from AM and LE. Calycosin, formononetin, ononin, and calycosin-7-O-β-d-glucoside are representative isoflavonoids isolated from AM. These isoflavonoids are considered bioactive components of AM, and studies on the activity of these components have also been reported including anti-tumor, anti-obesity, and anti-inflammatory [27–29]. In addition, saponins isolated from AM including Astragaloside I-IV are known to have pharmacological effects such as neuroprotective effects, anti-tumor, and anti-obesity [30–32]. In recent research on LE, studies on phenolic compounds such as lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid as well as shikonin have been reported that these chemicals have positive effects on anti-HIV, Parkinson’s disease, vascular protection, and antidiabetic effect [33–36].In a recent study, we demonstrated that a mixture of two herbal extracts, called ALM16 as a novel formulation, had a hepatoprotective effect against non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using a mouse model [37]. ALM16 administration significantly inhibited hepatic steatosis in NAFLD mice by modulating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) signaling pathway in the liver and was more effective than the individual extracts. These observations indicate that ALM16 can exert a synergistic effect, as well as expect a potent biological effect against obesity or metabolic diseases. Although these two herbs have the potential to improve effects mixed with other herbs, the anti-obesity effect of these two herbs combination is poorly explored. Based on this point, the present study aims to evaluate whether ALM16 has an anti-obesity effect in a high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mouse model and synergistically enhances the effect over the use of individual herb alone. For comparison, Garciniacambogia extract (GC) was used as a positive control in this experiment because it is known to contain hydroxycitric acid (HCA), which inhibits lipogenesis [38]. In addition, simultaneous analysis using UPLC-QTOF/MS was utilized to profile metabolites of each extract for quality control.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. UPLC-Q-TOF/MS Analyses

Analysis of compounds in the AMLE mixture was performed using UPLC with Q-TOF/MS. UPLC was performed using a Waters ACUITY H-CLASS UPLC (Waters Corp.,) The mobile phases were composed of solvent A (water and 0.1% formic acid (v/v)) and solvent B (MeCN and 0.1% formic acid (v/v)). The flow rate was 350μL/min, and the injection volume was 2 μL. The elution conditions were as follows: 0–3.5 min, B 10–35%; 3.5–7 min, B 35–45%; 7–14 min, B 45–95%; 14–16 min, B 95–100; 16–17 min, B 100–100%; 17–18 min, B 100–10%. The column oven and sample tray were maintained at 35°C and 4°C, respectively. MS analysis was carried out using a Waters Xevo G2-S QTOF MS (Waters Corp.,) in negative mode. The mass parameters were set as follows: cone voltage 40 V; capillary 3.0 kV; source temperature 120°C; desolvation temperature 300°C; cone gas flow 30 L/h; and desolvation gas flow 800 L/h. Data were collected between 100 and 2000 m/z using the MSE acquisition mode. An internal reference (Leucine-enkephalin, m/z 554.262 (ESI-)) was used to obtain accurate mass measurements.


### 2.2. Preparation of ALM16 with AM and LE Extracts

The ALM16 was prepared that the AM and LE extracts were mixed in a ratio of 7 : 3 (w/w), as described in a previous study [39]. The AM (MPS005087) and LE (MPS004961) were purchased from Jecheon, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea. Briefly, the AM and LE were extracted twice with 50% and 70% aqueous fermented ethanol at 80°C for 4 h, respectively, and the resulting extracts were concentrated, sterilized, dried under pressure (−0.08 MPa), and mixed to produce the ALM16. The powdered samples were stored at −20°C and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for the in vitro and in vivo experiments.


### 2.3. Animal

Five-week-old C57BL/6 male mice (weighing approximately 16–19 g) were purchased from the ORIENT BIO INC (Gyeonggi-do, Korea), and were housed in the specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility. All mice were treated in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the INVIVO, Co., Ltd. (IACUC proved number, IV-RA-04-1904-05), and all efforts have been made to minimize the number of animals used. During the experiment, mice were maintained under a 12/12-h light-dark cycle at controlled temperatures (22 ± 2°C) and 50 ± 10% humidity for adaptation.


### 2.4. Experiment Design and Treatment

After the acclimatization period, a total of 48 male C57BL/6 mice were randomly allocated into eight groups (6 mice/group): (1) ND: Normal diet (10% Kcal fat), (2) HFD: High-fat diet (60% Kcal fat), (3) AM: HFD + 100 mg/kgAstragalus membranaceus extract, (4) LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg Lithospermum erythrorhizon extract, (5–7) ALM16-L, M, and H: HFD + 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg mixture of Astragalus membranaceus andLithospermum erythrorhizon extracts, respectively, and (8) GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg Garcinia cambogia extract (as a positive control). The ND (Cat No. D12350 J) and HFD (Cat No. D12492) were purchased from Research diets, INC. (New Brunswick, NJ, USA). The nutrition facts of the experimental diet are listed in Table 1. After 6 weeks of HFD-induced obesity, all samples were dissolved in PBS and orally administered daily for 5 weeks. The groups fed with ND or HFD only were given an equal volume of PBS by orally administered at the same time. The body weights and food intake of the mice were measured every week. At the end of the experimental period, all mice were fasted for 12 h and were then anesthetized with 2–2.5% isoflurane in oxygen. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture. After blood samples were clotted, serum was separated by centrifugation (3,000 rpm, 10 min). Subsequently, white adipose tissues (WATs)—which contain peri-renal (pWAT), retroperitoneal (rWAT), and epididymal (eWAT) —and liver were then collected and weighed. All the processes of the animal experiment were described in Figure 1.Table 1
Composition of experimental diet.
ComponentsNormal dietHigh-fat dietgm%Kcal%gm%Kcal%Protein19.22026.220Carbohydrate67.37026.320Fat4.31034.960Total100100IngredientgmKcalgmKcalCasein, 30 mesh200800200800L-Cystine312312Corn starch506.22024.800Maltodextrin 10125500125500Sucrose68.8275.268.8275.2Cellulose, BW200500500Soybean oil2522525225Lard201802452205Mineral Mix S10026100100DiCalcium phosphate130130Calcium carbonate5.505.50Potassium citrate16.5016.50Vitamin Mix V1000110401040Choline bitartrate2020FD&C yellow dye #50.040——FD&C blue dye #50.0100.050Total1055.054057773.854057Figure 1
Overall process of animal experiment.


### 2.5. Serum Biochemical Analysis

Serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL), as well as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), were measured Automated Biochemistry Analyzer (BS220, Mindray, China). Additionally, commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were used to measure serum levels of leptin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and adiponectin (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).


### 2.6. Histological Analysis

Liver and eWAT were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut at 3-μm thickness. For histological analysis, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Adipocyte size of the eWAT was quantified using a light microscope (Olympus BX50, Olympus Optical Co., Japan). Liver tissue was also examined the hepatic steatosis by a toxicologic pathologist in a blinded manner.


### 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard errors (SE). Statistical analyses were performed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test using SPSS ver. 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences between the groups were considered statistically significant whenp<0.05. The various components analyzed in ALM16 are shown in Table 2.Table 2
The list of various components analyzed in ALM16.
No.ComponentsRT (min)Molecular formulaExpected neutral mass (Da)Observed neutral mass (Da)Observed m/zMass error (ppm)Relative quantification (mg/g)1Calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucoside2.45C22H22O10446.1213446.1211491.1193−0.40.52Lithospermic acid3.21C27H22O12538.1113538.1101537.1029−1.80.33Ononin3.6C22H22O9430.1263430.1259475.1241−1.10.354Salvianolic acid A3.7C26H22O10494.1213494.1209439.1136−0.82.1125Calycosin3.99C16H12O5284.0684284.0678283.0605−2.50.4796Astragaloside IV5.45C41H68O14784.4609784.4617829.459910.4877Formononetin5.58C16H12O4268.0735268.0732267.066−1.20.6598Astragaloside III5.6C41H68O14784.4609784.4619829.46011.30.8919Astragaloside II6.3C43H70O15826.4714826.4723871.470511.40410Astragaloside I8.08C45H72O16868.482868.483913.48141.21.411


## 2.1. UPLC-Q-TOF/MS Analyses

Analysis of compounds in the AMLE mixture was performed using UPLC with Q-TOF/MS. UPLC was performed using a Waters ACUITY H-CLASS UPLC (Waters Corp.,) The mobile phases were composed of solvent A (water and 0.1% formic acid (v/v)) and solvent B (MeCN and 0.1% formic acid (v/v)). The flow rate was 350μL/min, and the injection volume was 2 μL. The elution conditions were as follows: 0–3.5 min, B 10–35%; 3.5–7 min, B 35–45%; 7–14 min, B 45–95%; 14–16 min, B 95–100; 16–17 min, B 100–100%; 17–18 min, B 100–10%. The column oven and sample tray were maintained at 35°C and 4°C, respectively. MS analysis was carried out using a Waters Xevo G2-S QTOF MS (Waters Corp.,) in negative mode. The mass parameters were set as follows: cone voltage 40 V; capillary 3.0 kV; source temperature 120°C; desolvation temperature 300°C; cone gas flow 30 L/h; and desolvation gas flow 800 L/h. Data were collected between 100 and 2000 m/z using the MSE acquisition mode. An internal reference (Leucine-enkephalin, m/z 554.262 (ESI-)) was used to obtain accurate mass measurements.


## 2.2. Preparation of ALM16 with AM and LE Extracts

The ALM16 was prepared that the AM and LE extracts were mixed in a ratio of 7 : 3 (w/w), as described in a previous study [39]. The AM (MPS005087) and LE (MPS004961) were purchased from Jecheon, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea. Briefly, the AM and LE were extracted twice with 50% and 70% aqueous fermented ethanol at 80°C for 4 h, respectively, and the resulting extracts were concentrated, sterilized, dried under pressure (−0.08 MPa), and mixed to produce the ALM16. The powdered samples were stored at −20°C and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for the in vitro and in vivo experiments.


## 2.3. Animal

Five-week-old C57BL/6 male mice (weighing approximately 16–19 g) were purchased from the ORIENT BIO INC (Gyeonggi-do, Korea), and were housed in the specific pathogen-free (SPF) facility. All mice were treated in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the INVIVO, Co., Ltd. (IACUC proved number, IV-RA-04-1904-05), and all efforts have been made to minimize the number of animals used. During the experiment, mice were maintained under a 12/12-h light-dark cycle at controlled temperatures (22 ± 2°C) and 50 ± 10% humidity for adaptation.


## 2.4. Experiment Design and Treatment

After the acclimatization period, a total of 48 male C57BL/6 mice were randomly allocated into eight groups (6 mice/group): (1) ND: Normal diet (10% Kcal fat), (2) HFD: High-fat diet (60% Kcal fat), (3) AM: HFD + 100 mg/kgAstragalus membranaceus extract, (4) LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg Lithospermum erythrorhizon extract, (5–7) ALM16-L, M, and H: HFD + 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg mixture of Astragalus membranaceus andLithospermum erythrorhizon extracts, respectively, and (8) GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg Garcinia cambogia extract (as a positive control). The ND (Cat No. D12350 J) and HFD (Cat No. D12492) were purchased from Research diets, INC. (New Brunswick, NJ, USA). The nutrition facts of the experimental diet are listed in Table 1. After 6 weeks of HFD-induced obesity, all samples were dissolved in PBS and orally administered daily for 5 weeks. The groups fed with ND or HFD only were given an equal volume of PBS by orally administered at the same time. The body weights and food intake of the mice were measured every week. At the end of the experimental period, all mice were fasted for 12 h and were then anesthetized with 2–2.5% isoflurane in oxygen. Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture. After blood samples were clotted, serum was separated by centrifugation (3,000 rpm, 10 min). Subsequently, white adipose tissues (WATs)—which contain peri-renal (pWAT), retroperitoneal (rWAT), and epididymal (eWAT) —and liver were then collected and weighed. All the processes of the animal experiment were described in Figure 1.Table 1
Composition of experimental diet.
ComponentsNormal dietHigh-fat dietgm%Kcal%gm%Kcal%Protein19.22026.220Carbohydrate67.37026.320Fat4.31034.960Total100100IngredientgmKcalgmKcalCasein, 30 mesh200800200800L-Cystine312312Corn starch506.22024.800Maltodextrin 10125500125500Sucrose68.8275.268.8275.2Cellulose, BW200500500Soybean oil2522525225Lard201802452205Mineral Mix S10026100100DiCalcium phosphate130130Calcium carbonate5.505.50Potassium citrate16.5016.50Vitamin Mix V1000110401040Choline bitartrate2020FD&C yellow dye #50.040——FD&C blue dye #50.0100.050Total1055.054057773.854057Figure 1
Overall process of animal experiment.


## 2.5. Serum Biochemical Analysis

Serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL), as well as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), were measured Automated Biochemistry Analyzer (BS220, Mindray, China). Additionally, commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were used to measure serum levels of leptin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and adiponectin (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).


## 2.6. Histological Analysis

Liver and eWAT were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut at 3-μm thickness. For histological analysis, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Adipocyte size of the eWAT was quantified using a light microscope (Olympus BX50, Olympus Optical Co., Japan). Liver tissue was also examined the hepatic steatosis by a toxicologic pathologist in a blinded manner.


## 2.7. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as mean ± standard errors (SE). Statistical analyses were performed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison test using SPSS ver. 12 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences between the groups were considered statistically significant whenp<0.05. The various components analyzed in ALM16 are shown in Table 2.Table 2
The list of various components analyzed in ALM16.
No.ComponentsRT (min)Molecular formulaExpected neutral mass (Da)Observed neutral mass (Da)Observed m/zMass error (ppm)Relative quantification (mg/g)1Calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucoside2.45C22H22O10446.1213446.1211491.1193−0.40.52Lithospermic acid3.21C27H22O12538.1113538.1101537.1029−1.80.33Ononin3.6C22H22O9430.1263430.1259475.1241−1.10.354Salvianolic acid A3.7C26H22O10494.1213494.1209439.1136−0.82.1125Calycosin3.99C16H12O5284.0684284.0678283.0605−2.50.4796Astragaloside IV5.45C41H68O14784.4609784.4617829.459910.4877Formononetin5.58C16H12O4268.0735268.0732267.066−1.20.6598Astragaloside III5.6C41H68O14784.4609784.4619829.46011.30.8919Astragaloside II6.3C43H70O15826.4714826.4723871.470511.40410Astragaloside I8.08C45H72O16868.482868.483913.48141.21.411


## 3. Results

### 3.1. ALM16 Reduced Body Weight and Food Efficiency in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

At the end of the experiment, the HFD group significantly increased (p<0.05) total body weight (40.91 ± 1.75) and body weight gain (25.99 ± 1.14) compared with the ND group (29.85 ± 0.46 g, 11.62 ± 0.46 g). In contrast to the HFD group, ALM16 (100 and 200 mg/kg) administration significantly suppressed total body weight (8.4 and 10.4%, respectively, p<0.05, Figure 2(a)) and body weight gain (26.7 and 28.8%, respectively, p<0.05, Figure 2(b)). Notably, the effects of 100 mg/kg ALM16 on body weight gain were significantly greater than in AM or LE (100 mg/kg) groups, while were similar to the GC (100 mg/kg) group. Food intake did not differ significantly among all experimental groups (Figure 2(c)). The food efficiency ratio (FER) was significantly higher in the HFD group than those of the ND group but decreased in mice treated with AM (p>0.05), LE (p<0.05), ALM16-L (p>0.05), ALM16-M (p<0.05), ALM16-H (p<0.05), or GC (p<0.05) by 9.8, 16.0, 7.3, 15.8, 19.7, or 12.0%, respectively, compared with the HFD group (Figure 2(d)). The administration of 100 and 200 mg/kg of ALM16 was observed to be more potent in body weight gain and FER inhibitory effects than the other groups, but there were no significant differences between these two groups.Figure 2
Effects of ALM16 on body weight and food intake in HFD-fed mice; (a) changes in body weight, (b) body weight gain, (c) food intake, and (d) food efficiency ratio (FER). Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.2. ALM16 Aameliorated Serum Lipid Profiles in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

The serum lipid levels (TG, TC, HDL, and LDL) in the experimental groups were shown in Figure3. The HFD group increased serum levels of TG (p>0.05, Figure 3(a)), TC (p<0.05, Figure 3(b)), LDL (p<0.05, Figure 3(d)) by 9.4, 9.4, and 8.6%, respectively, compared to the ND group, but decreased serum levels of HDL (p>0.05, Figure 3(c)). In contrast, the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group significantly reduced (p<0.05) the serum levels of TG, TC, and LDL by 18.9, 17.5, and 29.0%, respectively, compared to the HFD group, while significantly increased (p<0.05) serum levels of HDL by 18.7%. ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group was shown to be similar to or more effective on the serum levels of lipid than the other doses of ALM16 groups. The LE group had significantly decreased the serum levels of TG (p<0.05) by 9.4%, whereas it had no significant differences in the serum levels of TC, LDL, and HDL compared to the HFD group. In addition, the AM group had no significant differences in the serum levels of TG, TC, HDL, and LDL compared to the HFD group.Figure 3
Effects of ALM16 on serum lipid profiles in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) serum levels of triglyceride (TG), (b) total cholesterol (TC), (c) HDL-cholesterol, and (d) LDL-cholesterol in HFD-fed mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


### 3.3. ALM16 Ameliorated Adipokine Levels in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

Serum leptin levels of HFD-fed mice (37,198.2 ± 4,475.9 pg/ml) significantly increased (p<0.05) by 18.6-fold compared to the ND group (1,997.6 ± 302.9 pg/ml). However, AM, LE, ALM16-L, M, H, and GC groups decreased the serum leptin levels by 8.2, 22.4, 13.4, 29.5, 21.1, and 19.0% respectively, compared with the HFD group. Interestingly, serum leptin levels in the ALM16-M group (p<0.05) were significantly lower than in the HFD group and were more effective when compared to AM, LE, and GC at the same dose (Figure 4(a)). The serum adiponectin levels of the ND group (19,231.9 ± 213.6 ng/ml) were significantly higher than in the HFD group (17,494 ± 351.6 ng/ml, p<0.05). However, the decrease of serum adiponectin levels induced by HFD was significantly increased in the AM, LE, ALM16-L, M, H, and GC groups by 7.1, 6.3, 8.2, 10.5, 7.2, and 10.2%, respectively, compared to the HFD group (Figure 4(b)). Interestingly, administration of ALM16 (100 mg/kg) was more effective than administration of AM or LE (100 mg/kg) alone. The ALM16-M (19337.7 ± 86.6 ng/ml) and GC (19281.9 ± 166.3 ng/ml) groups had increased serum adiponectin levels similar to the ND group.Figure 4
Effects of ALM16 on adipokines production in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) serum levels of leptin and (b) adiponectininHFD-fed mice were measured by ELISA assay. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)


### 3.4. ALM16 Suppressed Fat Accumulation of White Adipose Tissues in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

To investigate the effects of ALM16 on weights and masses of WATs in HFD-induced obese mice, the weights and masses of WATs were monitored at the end of the experiment. As shown in Figure5(a), the masses of pWAT, rWAT, and eWAT were higher in the HFD group than in the ND group, respectively. However, all treated groups showed reduced masses of WATs compared with the HFD group. The weights of WATs were significantly increased in the HFD group compared to the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 5(b)–5(d)). ALM16 100 mg/kg group showed significantly reduced weights of pWAT, rWAT, and eWAT by 23.1, 15.6, and 44.5%, respectively, compared with the HFD group (p<0.05). Interestingly, the weight of eWAT showed a significant reduction effect in the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) than in the GC (100 mg/kg) group. In addition, AM and LE groups had no significant differences in the weights of pWAT and eWAT, respectively, compared to the HFD group, but had a significant inhibitory effect on the rWAT weight gain. Adipocyte size in eWAT was examined in H&E stained sections. The adipocyte size was significantly larger in the HFD group than in the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 6(a)), whereas it was significantly smaller in the AM, LE, ALM16 (L, M, and H) groups (p<0.05, respectively) than in the HFD group (Figure 6(b)).Figure 5
Inhibitory effects of ALM16 on weight gain of white adipose tissues (WATs) gain in HFD-induced mice; (a) photographs of representative WATs, (b) weights of peri-renal WAT, (c) retroperitoneal WAT, and (d) epididymal WAT from mice fed an HFD. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 6
Effect of ALM16 on lipid accumulation in epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) representative histological images of H&E stained eWAT (magnification, 4×, scale bar 100μm) and (b) adipocytes size were quantified under microscope. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: normal diet; HFD: high-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)


### 3.5. ALM16 Inhibited Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Damage in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

Histological changes and weight gain in the liver tissues of the experimental groups were shown in Figure7. The liver section of the HFD group observed a severe accumulation of lipid droplets compared to that of the ND group which appeared as clear (Figure 7(a)), as well as was significantly higher hepatic steatosis grade (2.50 ± 0.22, p<0.05) than in the ND group (0.17 ± 0.17, Figure 7(b)). In addition, the HFD group exhibited a significant increase in liver weight (1.62 ± 0.16, p<0.05) compared with the ND group (1.01 ± 0.02, Figure 7(c)). In contrast, administration of ALM16 (L, M, and H) and GC significantly reduced the deposition of lipids in the liver tissue, hepatic steatosis grade (1.50 ± 0.22, 1.00 ± 0.00, 1.00 ± 0.00, and 1.00 ± 0.26, respectively, p<0.05), and liver weights (1.23 ± 0.05, 1.09 ± 0.04, 1.13 ± 0.05, and 1.10 ± 0.03 g, respectively, p<0.05) compared to the those of the HFD group. In the AM and LE groups, although no significant effects on hepatic steatosis were observed, the liver weight gains were significantly inhibited by the administration of AM (1.33 ± 0.08 g) or LE (1.21 ± 0.08 g) compared to the HFD group. Moreover, the HFD group showed significantly higher serum levels of AST and ALT (as the markers of liver damage), respectively, when compared to that of the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 7(d) and 7(e)). However, the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group showed significant reductions (19.4 and 49.8% reduction, respectively) in both serum levels of AST and ALT compared with the HFD group. The inhibitory effects of ALM16 (100 mg/kg) on serum levels of AST and ALT were more potent than those of the AM or LE group.Figure 7
Protective effects of ALM16 against hepatic steatosis and liver damage in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) representative histological images of the liver were assessed using H&E staining (magnification, 4×, scale bar 100μm),(b) steatosis grade and (c) weight of liver in HFD-induced obese mice, (d) Serum levels of ALT, and (e) AST in HFD-induced obese mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: normal diet; HFD: high-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


### 3.6. Profiling and Quantification of Various Components from ALM16 Using UPLC-QTOF/MS

UPLC-QTOF/MS with an in-house library was conducted to profile the metabolites in ALM16, AM, and LE extracts. The total ion chromatograms (TICs) of ALM16, AM, and LE extracts were shown in Figure8. The intensities of major peaks in AM extracts were decreased in ALM16. The major peaks of LE extracts also showed this decrease in the ALM16. The decrease in the major peak of the LE extracts in ALM16 was more pronounced than in AM extracts, probably because the proportion of LE extracts was lower in the ALM16. The peak intensities were analyzed for the relative quantification of ALM16, AM, and LE extracts and confirmed metabolic change. For relative quantification analysis, eight kinds of Astragalus membranaceus derived components including calycosin and calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucoside and lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid A, which are components derived from Lithospermum erythrorhizon were analyzed using the in-house library. In the relative quantification of ALM16, the intensity of AM-derived components such as calycosin and astragaloside was decreased similarly to the mixture ration, and lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid A, which are LE-derived components, also decreased in the AML16.Figure 8
The total ion chromatograms of (a) AM extracts, (b) LE extracts, and (c) ALM16.
(a)(b)(c)


## 3.1. ALM16 Reduced Body Weight and Food Efficiency in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

At the end of the experiment, the HFD group significantly increased (p<0.05) total body weight (40.91 ± 1.75) and body weight gain (25.99 ± 1.14) compared with the ND group (29.85 ± 0.46 g, 11.62 ± 0.46 g). In contrast to the HFD group, ALM16 (100 and 200 mg/kg) administration significantly suppressed total body weight (8.4 and 10.4%, respectively, p<0.05, Figure 2(a)) and body weight gain (26.7 and 28.8%, respectively, p<0.05, Figure 2(b)). Notably, the effects of 100 mg/kg ALM16 on body weight gain were significantly greater than in AM or LE (100 mg/kg) groups, while were similar to the GC (100 mg/kg) group. Food intake did not differ significantly among all experimental groups (Figure 2(c)). The food efficiency ratio (FER) was significantly higher in the HFD group than those of the ND group but decreased in mice treated with AM (p>0.05), LE (p<0.05), ALM16-L (p>0.05), ALM16-M (p<0.05), ALM16-H (p<0.05), or GC (p<0.05) by 9.8, 16.0, 7.3, 15.8, 19.7, or 12.0%, respectively, compared with the HFD group (Figure 2(d)). The administration of 100 and 200 mg/kg of ALM16 was observed to be more potent in body weight gain and FER inhibitory effects than the other groups, but there were no significant differences between these two groups.Figure 2
Effects of ALM16 on body weight and food intake in HFD-fed mice; (a) changes in body weight, (b) body weight gain, (c) food intake, and (d) food efficiency ratio (FER). Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.2. ALM16 Aameliorated Serum Lipid Profiles in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

The serum lipid levels (TG, TC, HDL, and LDL) in the experimental groups were shown in Figure3. The HFD group increased serum levels of TG (p>0.05, Figure 3(a)), TC (p<0.05, Figure 3(b)), LDL (p<0.05, Figure 3(d)) by 9.4, 9.4, and 8.6%, respectively, compared to the ND group, but decreased serum levels of HDL (p>0.05, Figure 3(c)). In contrast, the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group significantly reduced (p<0.05) the serum levels of TG, TC, and LDL by 18.9, 17.5, and 29.0%, respectively, compared to the HFD group, while significantly increased (p<0.05) serum levels of HDL by 18.7%. ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group was shown to be similar to or more effective on the serum levels of lipid than the other doses of ALM16 groups. The LE group had significantly decreased the serum levels of TG (p<0.05) by 9.4%, whereas it had no significant differences in the serum levels of TC, LDL, and HDL compared to the HFD group. In addition, the AM group had no significant differences in the serum levels of TG, TC, HDL, and LDL compared to the HFD group.Figure 3
Effects of ALM16 on serum lipid profiles in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) serum levels of triglyceride (TG), (b) total cholesterol (TC), (c) HDL-cholesterol, and (d) LDL-cholesterol in HFD-fed mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)


## 3.3. ALM16 Ameliorated Adipokine Levels in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

Serum leptin levels of HFD-fed mice (37,198.2 ± 4,475.9 pg/ml) significantly increased (p<0.05) by 18.6-fold compared to the ND group (1,997.6 ± 302.9 pg/ml). However, AM, LE, ALM16-L, M, H, and GC groups decreased the serum leptin levels by 8.2, 22.4, 13.4, 29.5, 21.1, and 19.0% respectively, compared with the HFD group. Interestingly, serum leptin levels in the ALM16-M group (p<0.05) were significantly lower than in the HFD group and were more effective when compared to AM, LE, and GC at the same dose (Figure 4(a)). The serum adiponectin levels of the ND group (19,231.9 ± 213.6 ng/ml) were significantly higher than in the HFD group (17,494 ± 351.6 ng/ml, p<0.05). However, the decrease of serum adiponectin levels induced by HFD was significantly increased in the AM, LE, ALM16-L, M, H, and GC groups by 7.1, 6.3, 8.2, 10.5, 7.2, and 10.2%, respectively, compared to the HFD group (Figure 4(b)). Interestingly, administration of ALM16 (100 mg/kg) was more effective than administration of AM or LE (100 mg/kg) alone. The ALM16-M (19337.7 ± 86.6 ng/ml) and GC (19281.9 ± 166.3 ng/ml) groups had increased serum adiponectin levels similar to the ND group.Figure 4
Effects of ALM16 on adipokines production in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) serum levels of leptin and (b) adiponectininHFD-fed mice were measured by ELISA assay. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)


## 3.4. ALM16 Suppressed Fat Accumulation of White Adipose Tissues in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

To investigate the effects of ALM16 on weights and masses of WATs in HFD-induced obese mice, the weights and masses of WATs were monitored at the end of the experiment. As shown in Figure5(a), the masses of pWAT, rWAT, and eWAT were higher in the HFD group than in the ND group, respectively. However, all treated groups showed reduced masses of WATs compared with the HFD group. The weights of WATs were significantly increased in the HFD group compared to the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 5(b)–5(d)). ALM16 100 mg/kg group showed significantly reduced weights of pWAT, rWAT, and eWAT by 23.1, 15.6, and 44.5%, respectively, compared with the HFD group (p<0.05). Interestingly, the weight of eWAT showed a significant reduction effect in the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) than in the GC (100 mg/kg) group. In addition, AM and LE groups had no significant differences in the weights of pWAT and eWAT, respectively, compared to the HFD group, but had a significant inhibitory effect on the rWAT weight gain. Adipocyte size in eWAT was examined in H&E stained sections. The adipocyte size was significantly larger in the HFD group than in the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 6(a)), whereas it was significantly smaller in the AM, LE, ALM16 (L, M, and H) groups (p<0.05, respectively) than in the HFD group (Figure 6(b)).Figure 5
Inhibitory effects of ALM16 on weight gain of white adipose tissues (WATs) gain in HFD-induced mice; (a) photographs of representative WATs, (b) weights of peri-renal WAT, (c) retroperitoneal WAT, and (d) epididymal WAT from mice fed an HFD. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: Normal diet; HFD: High-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)Figure 6
Effect of ALM16 on lipid accumulation in epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) representative histological images of H&E stained eWAT (magnification, 4×, scale bar 100μm) and (b) adipocytes size were quantified under microscope. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: normal diet; HFD: high-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)


## 3.5. ALM16 Inhibited Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Damage in HFD-Induced Obese Mice

Histological changes and weight gain in the liver tissues of the experimental groups were shown in Figure7. The liver section of the HFD group observed a severe accumulation of lipid droplets compared to that of the ND group which appeared as clear (Figure 7(a)), as well as was significantly higher hepatic steatosis grade (2.50 ± 0.22, p<0.05) than in the ND group (0.17 ± 0.17, Figure 7(b)). In addition, the HFD group exhibited a significant increase in liver weight (1.62 ± 0.16, p<0.05) compared with the ND group (1.01 ± 0.02, Figure 7(c)). In contrast, administration of ALM16 (L, M, and H) and GC significantly reduced the deposition of lipids in the liver tissue, hepatic steatosis grade (1.50 ± 0.22, 1.00 ± 0.00, 1.00 ± 0.00, and 1.00 ± 0.26, respectively, p<0.05), and liver weights (1.23 ± 0.05, 1.09 ± 0.04, 1.13 ± 0.05, and 1.10 ± 0.03 g, respectively, p<0.05) compared to the those of the HFD group. In the AM and LE groups, although no significant effects on hepatic steatosis were observed, the liver weight gains were significantly inhibited by the administration of AM (1.33 ± 0.08 g) or LE (1.21 ± 0.08 g) compared to the HFD group. Moreover, the HFD group showed significantly higher serum levels of AST and ALT (as the markers of liver damage), respectively, when compared to that of the ND group (p<0.05, Figure 7(d) and 7(e)). However, the ALM16 (100 mg/kg) group showed significant reductions (19.4 and 49.8% reduction, respectively) in both serum levels of AST and ALT compared with the HFD group. The inhibitory effects of ALM16 (100 mg/kg) on serum levels of AST and ALT were more potent than those of the AM or LE group.Figure 7
Protective effects of ALM16 against hepatic steatosis and liver damage in HFD-induced obese mice; (a) representative histological images of the liver were assessed using H&E staining (magnification, 4×, scale bar 100μm),(b) steatosis grade and (c) weight of liver in HFD-induced obese mice, (d) Serum levels of ALT, and (e) AST in HFD-induced obese mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate statistical differences between groups at p<0.05. ND: normal diet; HFD: high-fat diet; AM: HFD + 100 mg/kg AM extract; LE: HFD + 100 mg/kg LE extract; ALM16-L: 50 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-M: 100 mg/kg ALM16; ALM16-H: HFD + 200 mg/kg ALM16; GC: HFD + 100 mg/kg GC extract.
(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)


## 3.6. Profiling and Quantification of Various Components from ALM16 Using UPLC-QTOF/MS

UPLC-QTOF/MS with an in-house library was conducted to profile the metabolites in ALM16, AM, and LE extracts. The total ion chromatograms (TICs) of ALM16, AM, and LE extracts were shown in Figure8. The intensities of major peaks in AM extracts were decreased in ALM16. The major peaks of LE extracts also showed this decrease in the ALM16. The decrease in the major peak of the LE extracts in ALM16 was more pronounced than in AM extracts, probably because the proportion of LE extracts was lower in the ALM16. The peak intensities were analyzed for the relative quantification of ALM16, AM, and LE extracts and confirmed metabolic change. For relative quantification analysis, eight kinds of Astragalus membranaceus derived components including calycosin and calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucoside and lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid A, which are components derived from Lithospermum erythrorhizon were analyzed using the in-house library. In the relative quantification of ALM16, the intensity of AM-derived components such as calycosin and astragaloside was decreased similarly to the mixture ration, and lithospermic acid and salvianolic acid A, which are LE-derived components, also decreased in the AML16.Figure 8
The total ion chromatograms of (a) AM extracts, (b) LE extracts, and (c) ALM16.
(a)(b)(c)


## 4. Discussion

Obesity is a complex and chronic disease characterized by excessive accumulation of lipids. Obesity represents a severe health problem worldwide because it can increase the risk of many metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and fatty liver disease [4, 5]. Both AM and LE demonstrated various biological and pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory [23, 40] and anti-obesity properties [41, 42], but few studies have reported the obesity and synergistic effects of a mixture of these two herbal extracts. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine whether ALM16, a mixture of AM and LE extracts (7 : 3, w/w), can exert the anti-obesity effect and be more effective than those of individual materials.Our previous study reported that ALM16 contains three compounds (calycosin-7-O-β-D-glucoside, calycosin, and lithospermic acid, as chemical markers), and exerts a chondroprotective effect in an osteoarthritis rat model, based on synergistic actions [40]. In addition, in the previous study, only three representative compounds of ALM16 were identified, but in this study, UPLC-QTOF/MS profiling was performed on ALM16 to analyze the components of a mixture. Through profiling analysis, ten components including three compounds previously studied were identified in the mixture. Various components identified through analysis are known to have various physiological activities including anti-obesity and related activities. In a previous study using an in vitro obesity model, ononin showed anti-adipogenic capacity by upregulating SIRT1 and inhibiting PI3K, PPARγ, and adiponectin [43]. In addition, astragaloside IV is known to prevent obesity in a high-fat diet mouse model [32] and is also known to have a positive effect on obesity-related nephropathy and hypertension [44, 45]. Obesity is caused by the expansion of white adipose tissue and a decrease in brown adipose tissue. In a previous study by Lai et al., salvianolic acid A increased browning of white adipose tissue in high-fat diet-induced mice [46]. It is thought that components such as ononin or salvianolic acid may have affected the anti-obesity activity of the ALM16 in various ways. Herbal mixtures are expected to play multiple synergistic roles than single extracts. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and confirm the various components in the mixture.The ALM16 was selected effective ratio of 7 : 3 (w/w) by screening the chondroprotective effect among combinations mixed with the different ratios at in vitro model [47]. In recent, many studies have focused on identifying the novel combination of diverse herbs that possess beneficial effects for the treatment of multifactorial and chronic diseases [48, 49]. This is because the combination materials can exert multifunctional and multi-targeting through complementary interactions between each component according to the combination and mixing ratio of herbs. In our previous study, we further investigated and reported the hepatoprotective effect of ALM16 on hepatic steatosis in a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rodent model, indicating that ALM16 may have multifunctional properties [37]. Since the development of NAFLD is directly associated with obesity, we hypothesized that ALM16, which has confirmed protective effects against NAFLD, may have anti-obesity activity.For this purpose, we investigated the anti-obesity effect of AM, LE, and ALM16 using the HFD-induced obese mice model, which is the most widely used in obesity studies, as it closely resembles abnormalities parallelling the progression of human obesity [50]. In addition, it is well known that HFD feeding in rodents can readily induce obesity conditions such as increases in body weight gain, mass and weight of white adipose tissues, and levels of lipid profiles [51]. The result of this study showed that these parameters, which indicate obesity status, were significantly increased in the HFD group compared to the ND group. However, ALM16 effectively inhibited the increase in parameters induced by HFD feeding and was more effective than individual extract administrations. Zheng et al. reported that a combination of Erigeron annuus L. Pers and Borago officinalis L. was a markedly more potent anti-obesity effect than alone due to synergistic actions of certain functional components [52]. Han et al. reported that calycosin in AM directly improves perivascular adipose tissue dysfunction in obese mice [53]. Gwon et al. reported that LE has an anti-obesity effect by suppressing adipogenic transcriptional factors in white adipose tissue and is partially attributed to acetyl shikonin [42]. Consequently, our results indicated that ALM16 can synergistically exert anti-obesity effects, although understanding of the cross interactions between individual components is required.Leptin is one of the adipokines that is primarily secreted from adipose tissue and is involved in the increase of BMI and adipose tissue mass through the regulation of appetite and energy expenditure [54]. Koh et al. reported that HFD feeding in rodent models increases serum leptin levels, contributing to increased weight gain and fat accumulation [3]. In addition, adiponectin is one of the adipokines secreted by adipocytes to control glucose and lipid metabolism, and energy homeostasis in both humans and animals [55]. A number of anti-obesity studies have reported that serum adiponectin levels are decreased by HFD feeding, while elevated serum adiponectin levels are associated with a reduction in body weight gain [56,57]. It is well known that adiponectin in the liver activates fatty acid oxidation through the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) pathway and regulates fat lipid metabolism [58]. In various studies for anti-obesity treatment, increased adiponectin expression has been accepted as a major target, which has demonstrated therapeutic benefits in animal models [59, 60]. Therefore, the serum levels of leptin and adiponectin can be considered representative parameters of the obesity state. Similar to tendencies of previous studies, our results showed that ALM16 inhibited the increase in serum leptin levels by HFD feeding while increasing the reduced serum adiponectin levels. Hence, these results indicate that ALM16 may exert a positive effect on body weight gain, FER, fat mass, and WATs weight through regulation of serum adipokines levels. White adipose tissue (WAT) is an energy storage site and secret adipokines such as leptin and adiponectin [61]. WAT, which increases the size and number of adipocytes due to excessive fat accumulation in the obese state, leads to dysregulation of adipokines expression and causes related metabolic abnormalities [62].The liver is known as a key tissue that plays an important role in lipid metabolism including hepatic lipogenesis and fatty acid oxidation [63]. Various studies have observed elevated liver weight gain, hepatic steatosis condition, and liver toxicity induced by excessive hepatic lipid accumulation in rodents fed an HFD [64, 65]. Similarly, our results showed that the HFD group increased liver weight, hepatic steatosis grade, and serum levels AST and ALT associated with signs of liver damage, while the ALM16 group effectively ameliorated that fatty liver state. Thus, these results provide potent evidence that ALM16 may also exert a beneficial effect against hepatic steatosis, which is closely associated with dietary obesity.Meanwhile, the present study may provide scientific evidence to assess clinical effectiveness in the future but it has some limitations. First of all, the experiment was investigated with a small sample size, therefore, further study of large sample size is needed. Second, we investigated using the mice's limited conditions such as same sexual and certain age. To objectify, the additional approach using mice in various conditions is also required.


## 5. Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that ALM16 reduced weights of body and white adipose tissues, serum levels of lipid profiles, and adipokines in HFD-induced obese mice. In addition, ALM16 ameliorated HFD-induced increases in liver weight, hepatic steatosis, and liver damage. In particular, ALM16 showed more potent activity against obesity in mice fed HFD than individual extracts. These results suggest that ALM16 synergistically has the anti-obesity and anti-hepatic steatosis effects, and ultimately exerts multifunctional properties. Therefore, ALM16 may be considered a potential material for anti-obesity functional foods.



---

*Source: 9642427-2022-08-12.xml*