# Tolerance of Glyphosate-Resistant Maize to Glyphosate Plus MCPA Amine Is Influenced by Dose and Timing

Authors: Nader Soltani; Kris McNaughton; Chris L. Gillard; Robert E. Nurse; Peter H. Sikkema
Journal: Advances in Agriculture
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

There is little information on tolerance of glyphosate-resistant maize to glyphosate plus MCPA amine as influenced by dose and timing under Ontario environmental conditions. A total of seven field trials were conducted at various locations in Ontario, Canada, in 2011–2013 to evaluate tolerance of field maize to tank mixes of glyphosate (900 g a.e./ha) plus MCPA amine (79, 158, 315, 630, 1260, 2520, or 5040 g a.e./ha) at either the 4- or 8-leaf stage. The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 339, 751, and 1914 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize but only 64, 140, and 344 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively. The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% reduction in shoot dry weight of maize was 488, 844, and 1971 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and only 14, 136, and 616 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively. The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% yield reduction was 2557, 4247, and >5040 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 184, 441, and 1245 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively. Based on these results, glyphosate plus MCPA amine applied at the manufacturer’s recommended dose of 630 g a.e./ha applied to 4-leaf maize has potential to cause injury but the injury is transient with no significant reduction in yield. However, when glyphosate plus MCPA amine is applied to 8-leaf maize it has the potential to cause significant injury and yield loss in maize.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Canada produces nearly 11,000,000 metric tonnes of maize annually making it the 11th largest maize producer in the world [1]. Maize (Zea mays L.) is the third most valuable crop produced in Canada [1]. Greater than 95% of maize produced in Canada is grown in Eastern Canada, with Ontario producing 62% of the national production [1, 2]. Effective weed management is critical for maize producers to be competitive in the global market. Growers need weed management options that provide grass and broadleaved weed control with a wide margin of crop safety thereby resulting in minimal yield loss due to weed interference and higher net returns for producers.In Ontario, most weed management studies in maize have focused on common weeds such as common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexusL.), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus), and foxtails (Setariaspp.). In contrast, very little research has been conducted on weeds that affect only small percentage of the maize hectarage such as field horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.). Field horsetail is a competitive weed that has adapted to current agronomic practices and has moved into fertile grain fields [3]. It is increasing in prevalence in areas where growers rely on glyphosate for weed management since glyphosate is not very effective for the control of field horsetail. Field horsetail normally grows to a height of 30 to 40 cm and can be very competitive in crops as its rhizomes can form a thick mat underground during the summer growing season [4]. Significant yield losses have been reported in maize with heavy field horsetail stands that can reach densities of 400 shoots m−1 [3].Currently registered postemergence (POST) herbicides in field maize in Ontario including nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron, flumetsulam, and nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron + flumetsulam do not provide adequate control of field horsetail in maize [5]. However, studies have shown that MCPA amine (dimethylamine salt of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) applied alone or in tank mix with nicosulfuron/rimsulfuron or flumetsulam applied after emergence has potential to control field horsetail [4–8].MCPA amine is a phenoxy herbicide that in addition to field horsetail controls many broadleaved weeds including pigweed spp.,Polygonum spp.,Ambrosia spp.,Capsella bursa-pastoris (shepherd’s purse),Taraxacum officinale (dandelion),Delphinium bicolor (buttercup), andGaleopsis tetrahit (hemp-nettle) [9, 10]. MCPA amine is a growth regulating herbicide that affects respiration, translocation, and cell division which results in chlorosis of the growing points, growth inhibition, wilting, necrosis, and eventual death of susceptible plants within 3–5 weeks [10, 11].MCPA amine is a desirable compliment to the current weed management programs in glyphosate-resistant maize. It provides an alternative mode of action thereby reducing the selection intensity for glyphosate-resistant weeds and can effectively control troublesome weeds such as field horsetail in maize. MCPA amine is currently registered in Ontario at 380–630 g a.e./ha applied to maize up to 15 cm in height. MCPA amine is more injurious to maize than either 2,4-D or dicamba and therefore farmers are reluctant to use it. Earlier studies have shown as much as 5% injury in maize with MCPA amine applied after emergence at 630 g a.e./ha [5]. However, MCPA is the best herbicide available in Ontario for the control of field horsetail in maize. There is little information on the sensitivity of glyphosate-resistant maize to glyphosate plus MCPA amine applied after emergence at various doses and application timings under Ontario environmental conditions. Determining the appropriate MCPA amine dose and application timing will help maize growers avoid crop injury and associated yield loss and provide an additional option for control of troublesome, glyphosate tolerant weeds such as field horsetail.The objective of this research was to evaluate tolerance of field maize to tank mixes of glyphosate (900 g a.e./ha) plus MCPA amine applied after emergence at 79, 158, 315, 630, 1260, 2520, or 5040 g a.e./ha at either the 4- or 8-leaf stage of maize.


## 2. Materials and Methods

A total of seven field trials were conducted at various locations in Ontario, Canada, during 2011–2013. There were 3 experiments at Ridgetown, ON, Canada, in 2011 and 2012 and one experiment at Harrow, ON, Canada, in 2013. Seedbed preparation at all sites consisted of autumn moldboard plowing followed by two passes with a field cultivator with rolling basket harrows in the spring.Field trials were established as a randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments included glyphosate 900 g a.e./ha (weed-free control) and glyphosate at 900 g a.e./ha plus MCPA amine at 79, 158, 315, 630, 1260, 2520, or 5040 g a.e./ha. Plots consisted of four rows of maize that were spaced 0.75 m apart and were 8.0 m long. Maize was planted at the population of approximately 80,000 seeds ha−1 in May of each year. Herbicide treatments were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer equipped with Hypro ULD120-02 nozzle tips (Hypro, New Brighton, MN) calibrated to deliver 200 L ha−1 of water at 200 kPa. Herbicide applications were made with a 1.5 m boom with four nozzles spaced 50 cm apart. Herbicide treatments were applied at 4-leaf or 8-leaf maize (each timing to a separate set of plots). All plots including the nontreated control were kept weed-free by hand weeding as required.Maize injury was visually estimated on a scale of 0 (no injury) to 100% (complete plant death) at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the corresponding treatment application (WAT). Maize shoot dry weight was determined 4 WAT by cutting 10 plants per plot at the soil surface, drying at 60°C to constant moisture. At 8 WAT, maize height was measured for 10 plants per plot and brace root malformation was rated on a scale of 0 (no malformation) to 10 (severe malformation). Percent lodging (goose-necked or falling stalks) was rated prior to harvest, approximately 16 WAT. The maize crop was harvested with a small plot combine, weight and seed moisture content were recorded, and yields were adjusted to 15.5% seed moisture content.Data were analyzed using nonlinear regression (PROC NLIN) in SAS 9.2 [12]. Maize dry weight, height, and yield were converted to a percent of the glyphosate-only check prior to analysis.All parameters were regressed against MCPA amine dose, designated as RATE in the equations. The equation used for percent crop injury, brace root injury, and lodging (rectangular hyperbola based on Cousen’s yield loss model) was(1)
Y
=
i
∗
R
A
T
E
1
+
i
∗
R
A
T
E
/
a
,where a is the upper asymptote and i is the initial slope. For percent shoot dry weight, a descending rectangular hyperbola based on Cousen’s model was used:(2)
Y
=
d
1
-
b
∗
R
A
T
E
100
1
+
b
∗
R
A
T
E
/
c
,where b is the initial slope, c is the lower asymptote, and d is the Y-intercept. The equation for percent maize height and yield was an inverse exponential:(3)
Y
=
f
+
g
∗
exp
⁡
-
h
∗
R
A
T
E
,where f is the lower asymptote, g is the magnitude of the response, and h is the slope of the response.


## 3. Results and Discussions

Regression equations were used to calculate predicted MCPA rates (g a.e./ha) that would result in a 5, 10, or 20% crop/brace root injury or lodging or a 5, 10, or 20% reduction in percent crop dry weight, height, or yield, relative to the glyphosate-only check. If any MCPA rate was predicted to be higher than 5040 g a.e./ha, it was simply expressed as “>5040” since it would be improper to extrapolate outside the range of rates evaluated in these experiments.


### 3.1. Crop/Brace Root Injury or Lodging

For all injury ratings MCPA amine caused more injury when applied to 8-leaf maize compared to when it was applied to 4-leaf maize. At 1 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 380, 867, and 2415 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize but only 101, 215, and 492 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1), indicating that MCPA amine is far more injurious to maize when the application timing is delayed. At 2 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 339, 751, and 1914 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize but only 95, 204, and 479 g a.e./ha when applied to 8 leaf maize, respectively.Table 1
Parameter estimates and predicted MCPA rates from regression models of visible percent field maize injury 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT, brace root injury 8 WAT, and percent lodging prior to harvesta.
Crop injury
Application timing
Parameter estimatesb (±SE)
Predicted MCPA ratec
a
i
R
5
R
10
R
20
%
g a.e./ha
1 WAT
4-leaf corn
45 (6)
0.015 (0.002)
380
867
2415
8-leaf corn
90 (5)
0.052 (0.005)
101
215
492
2 WAT
4-leaf corn
56 (9)
0.016 (0.002)
339
751
1914
8-leaf corn
78 (4)
0.056 (0.005)
95
204
479
4 WAT
4-leaf corn
63 (22)
0.009 (0.002)
630
1380
3403
8-leaf corn
65 (4)
0.081 (0.012)
67
146
357
8 WAT
4-leaf corn
21 (6)
0.008 (0.003)
820
2414
>5040
8-leaf corn
63 (5)
0.085 (0.014)
64
140
344
Brace root
4-leaf corn
3 (1)
0.002 (0.001)
267
671
2740
8-leaf corn
9 (0)
0.068 (0.009)
8
17
38
Lodging
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
0 (0)
—
—
—
8-leaf corn
37 (7)
0.034 (0.013)
168
400
1283
aWAT, weeks after treatment.
bRegression parameters ((1), rectangular hyperbola): a, upper asymptote; i, initial slope.
c
R
5, R
10, and R
20 are the MCPA rates predicted to result in 5, 10, or 20% crop injury.Generally beyond 2 WAT, MCPA amine applied at 630 g a.e./ha or lower doses to 4-leaf maize caused no visible injury in maize. At 4 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 630, 1380, and 3403 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 67, 146, and 357 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1). At 8 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 820, 2414, and >5040 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 64, 140, and 344 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively.The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% brace root malformation was 267, 671, and 2740 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and only 8, 17, and 38 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1). There was no lodging injury when MCPA amine was applied at doses evaluated to 4-leaf maize but the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% lodging injury was 168, 400, and 1283 g a.e./ha when applied to 8 leaf maize, respectively (Table 1).In other studies, Buhler in 1991 [13] found no visible injury or reduction in plant stand in maize with other grass herbicides such as metolachlor and atrazine. However, other studies have shown as much as 28% injury in maize with herbicides such as alachlor and metolachlor depending on environmental conditions [14–17]. Other herbicides such as rimsulfuron, nicosulfuron, nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron, and primisulfuron have been shown to cause no injury in maize [18]. However, Swanton et al. [19] found as much as 19% injury in maize with sulfonylurea herbicides such as nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron.


### 3.2. Shoot Dry Weight and Height

The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% reduction in shoot dry weight of maize compared to the control was 488, 844, and 1971 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 14, 136, and 616 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table2). MCPA amine reduced shoot dry weight much more when applied to 8-leaf maize compared to when it was applied to 4-leaf maize (Table 2).Table 2
Parameter estimates and predicted MCPA rates from regression models of percent maize dry weight (4 WAT), height (8 WAT), and yielda.
Corn measurement
Application timing
Parameter estimatesb (±SE)
Predicted MCPA ratec
b
c
d
R
5
R
10
R
20
% of check
%
g a.e./ha
Dry weight
4-leaf corn
0.024 (0.015)
48 (17)
105 (4)
488
844
1971
8-leaf corn
0.054 (0.030)
33 (5)
96 (3)
14
136
616
f
g
h
%
Height
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
100 (0)
0.00001 (0.000002)
>5040
>5040
>5040
8-leaf corn
84 (1)
15 (1)
0.0008 (0.0002)
396
1116
—
Yield
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
103 (1)
0.00003 (0.000006)
2557
4247
>5040
8-leaf corn
70 (3)
29 (4)
0.0009 (0.0003)
184
441
1245
aWAT, weeks after treatment.
bRegression parameters ((2), descending rectangular hyperbola): b, initial slope; c, lower asymptote; d, Y-intercept.
((3), inverse exponential): f, lower asymptote; g, magnitude of response; h, slope of response.
c
R
5, R
10, and R
20 are the MCPA rates predicted to result in a 5, 10, or 20% reduction in percent corn dry weight, height, and yield.There was no effect on plant height when MCPA amine was applied to 4-leaf maize but the predicted dose of MCPA amine that reduced height by 5% was only 396 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize (Table2). In other studies Buhler [13] found no reduction in maize height with other herbicides such as metolachlor when applied with atrazine. However, Swanton et al. [19] found significant height reduction with sulfonylurea herbicides such as nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron in maize.


### 3.3. Yield

Maize was more tolerant to MCPA amine when applied at the 4-leaf stage than the 8-leaf stage. The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% yield reduction compared to the control was 2557, 4247, and >5040 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and only 184, 441, and 1245 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table2).In other studies, Buhler [13] found significant yield reduction with herbicides such as metolachlor with atrazine in maize. Other herbicides such as nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron have been shown to cause as much 16% yield reduction in maize [19].


## 3.1. Crop/Brace Root Injury or Lodging

For all injury ratings MCPA amine caused more injury when applied to 8-leaf maize compared to when it was applied to 4-leaf maize. At 1 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 380, 867, and 2415 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize but only 101, 215, and 492 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1), indicating that MCPA amine is far more injurious to maize when the application timing is delayed. At 2 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 339, 751, and 1914 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize but only 95, 204, and 479 g a.e./ha when applied to 8 leaf maize, respectively.Table 1
Parameter estimates and predicted MCPA rates from regression models of visible percent field maize injury 1, 2, 4, and 8 WAT, brace root injury 8 WAT, and percent lodging prior to harvesta.
Crop injury
Application timing
Parameter estimatesb (±SE)
Predicted MCPA ratec
a
i
R
5
R
10
R
20
%
g a.e./ha
1 WAT
4-leaf corn
45 (6)
0.015 (0.002)
380
867
2415
8-leaf corn
90 (5)
0.052 (0.005)
101
215
492
2 WAT
4-leaf corn
56 (9)
0.016 (0.002)
339
751
1914
8-leaf corn
78 (4)
0.056 (0.005)
95
204
479
4 WAT
4-leaf corn
63 (22)
0.009 (0.002)
630
1380
3403
8-leaf corn
65 (4)
0.081 (0.012)
67
146
357
8 WAT
4-leaf corn
21 (6)
0.008 (0.003)
820
2414
>5040
8-leaf corn
63 (5)
0.085 (0.014)
64
140
344
Brace root
4-leaf corn
3 (1)
0.002 (0.001)
267
671
2740
8-leaf corn
9 (0)
0.068 (0.009)
8
17
38
Lodging
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
0 (0)
—
—
—
8-leaf corn
37 (7)
0.034 (0.013)
168
400
1283
aWAT, weeks after treatment.
bRegression parameters ((1), rectangular hyperbola): a, upper asymptote; i, initial slope.
c
R
5, R
10, and R
20 are the MCPA rates predicted to result in 5, 10, or 20% crop injury.Generally beyond 2 WAT, MCPA amine applied at 630 g a.e./ha or lower doses to 4-leaf maize caused no visible injury in maize. At 4 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 630, 1380, and 3403 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 67, 146, and 357 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1). At 8 WAT, the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% injury was 820, 2414, and >5040 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 64, 140, and 344 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively.The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% brace root malformation was 267, 671, and 2740 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and only 8, 17, and 38 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table1). There was no lodging injury when MCPA amine was applied at doses evaluated to 4-leaf maize but the predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% lodging injury was 168, 400, and 1283 g a.e./ha when applied to 8 leaf maize, respectively (Table 1).In other studies, Buhler in 1991 [13] found no visible injury or reduction in plant stand in maize with other grass herbicides such as metolachlor and atrazine. However, other studies have shown as much as 28% injury in maize with herbicides such as alachlor and metolachlor depending on environmental conditions [14–17]. Other herbicides such as rimsulfuron, nicosulfuron, nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron, and primisulfuron have been shown to cause no injury in maize [18]. However, Swanton et al. [19] found as much as 19% injury in maize with sulfonylurea herbicides such as nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron.


## 3.2. Shoot Dry Weight and Height

The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% reduction in shoot dry weight of maize compared to the control was 488, 844, and 1971 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and 14, 136, and 616 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table2). MCPA amine reduced shoot dry weight much more when applied to 8-leaf maize compared to when it was applied to 4-leaf maize (Table 2).Table 2
Parameter estimates and predicted MCPA rates from regression models of percent maize dry weight (4 WAT), height (8 WAT), and yielda.
Corn measurement
Application timing
Parameter estimatesb (±SE)
Predicted MCPA ratec
b
c
d
R
5
R
10
R
20
% of check
%
g a.e./ha
Dry weight
4-leaf corn
0.024 (0.015)
48 (17)
105 (4)
488
844
1971
8-leaf corn
0.054 (0.030)
33 (5)
96 (3)
14
136
616
f
g
h
%
Height
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
100 (0)
0.00001 (0.000002)
>5040
>5040
>5040
8-leaf corn
84 (1)
15 (1)
0.0008 (0.0002)
396
1116
—
Yield
4-leaf corn
0 (0)
103 (1)
0.00003 (0.000006)
2557
4247
>5040
8-leaf corn
70 (3)
29 (4)
0.0009 (0.0003)
184
441
1245
aWAT, weeks after treatment.
bRegression parameters ((2), descending rectangular hyperbola): b, initial slope; c, lower asymptote; d, Y-intercept.
((3), inverse exponential): f, lower asymptote; g, magnitude of response; h, slope of response.
c
R
5, R
10, and R
20 are the MCPA rates predicted to result in a 5, 10, or 20% reduction in percent corn dry weight, height, and yield.There was no effect on plant height when MCPA amine was applied to 4-leaf maize but the predicted dose of MCPA amine that reduced height by 5% was only 396 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize (Table2). In other studies Buhler [13] found no reduction in maize height with other herbicides such as metolachlor when applied with atrazine. However, Swanton et al. [19] found significant height reduction with sulfonylurea herbicides such as nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron in maize.


## 3.3. Yield

Maize was more tolerant to MCPA amine when applied at the 4-leaf stage than the 8-leaf stage. The predicted dose of MCPA amine that caused 5, 10, and 20% yield reduction compared to the control was 2557, 4247, and >5040 g a.e./ha when applied to 4-leaf maize and only 184, 441, and 1245 g a.e./ha when applied to 8-leaf maize, respectively (Table2).In other studies, Buhler [13] found significant yield reduction with herbicides such as metolachlor with atrazine in maize. Other herbicides such as nicosulfuron plus rimsulfuron have been shown to cause as much 16% yield reduction in maize [19].


## 4. Conclusions

Based on these results, glyphosate plus MCPA amine applied at the manufacturer’s recommended dose of 630 g a.e./ha to 4-leaf maize has the potential to cause injury in maize but the injury is transient with no significant effect on maize yield. In contrast, glyphosate plus MCPA amine applied at the manufacturer’s recommended dose of 630 g a.e./ha to 8-leaf maize has the potential to cause significant injury resulting in substantial yield losses at harvest time. Glyphosate plus MCPA amine applied early after emergence is a desirable compliment to the current weed management programs in maize, especially for weeds that are naturally tolerant to glyphosate such as field horsetail. In addition, this tank mix will increase the spectrum of annual, biennial, and perennial broadleaf weeds control and will reduce the selection intensity for glyphosate-resistant biotypes.



---

*Source: 968050-2015-07-27.xml*