# Heuristic UTD Solution for Antennas Near a Complex Platform

Authors: Awika Pimpatang; Titipong Lertwiriyaprapa; Chuwong Phongcharoenpanich
Journal: International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
 (2019)

---

## Abstract

This paper is aimed at developing an approximate and relatively simple but closed-form uniform geometrical theory of diffraction (UTD) solution for describing the radiated and scattered fields by an antenna near a complex platform consisting of a three-dimensional (3-D) thin material-coated metallic surface, including edges and corners. Unlike the previous works that consider primarily plane wave scattering, the developed solution can also treat radiation/scattering problems of antennas near finite material-coated metallic surfaces which are composed of edges and corners. The developed solution, which is formulated by using a heuristic approach, recovers the proper local plane wave Fresnel reflection coefficient. In addition, the developed UTD-diffracted fields will satisfy the radiation condition, boundary conditions on the conductor. The accuracy of the developed solution is verified by comparing with simulation results from a computer software. It is found that the results from our developed solution agree well with those of references. However, some small discrepancies occur but it is good enough for engineering applications. The proposed solution can be very useful for antenna engineers to design multiple antennas with an electrically large complex material-coated platform.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In modern antenna system design, platforms are part of the antenna. For example, platforms of modern antenna systems involving modern aircraft, naval ships, or wireless communication system in urban area often contain material treatments over metallic surfaces to control their scattering. It is necessary to include the effects of the platform on the design and development of modern antenna systems. Thus, the efficient and reliable computational tools are needed.With the advent of large and fast computers, numerical approaches such as the method of moments (MoM), the finite element method (FEM), the finite element boundary integral (FE-BI) method, or the finite different time domain (FDTD) method are able to deal with electromagnetic (EM) radiation/scattering problems at low to moderately high frequencies for which the radiation/scattering platforms are relatively small to moderately large in terms of the EM wavelength, respectively. However, all of these numerical techniques become very poorly convergent, inefficient, and sometimes even intractable at high frequencies. In contrast to the conventional numerical methods mentioned above, the UTD analysis [1] can be performed by identifying all of dominant ray contributions. In order to model the platform accurately, it depends on the availability of the relevant UTD coefficients. Thus, it is necessary to know all the UTD coefficients which are required for predicting the fields of antennas on platforms.In this paper, the focus is mainly on the UTD analysis of EM diffraction by edges and corners in material-coated PEC planar configuration as shown in Figure1. The three-dimensional (3-D) skew incidence cases where the source can be a uniform plane wave or a current moment (an antenna) are also of interest here. The material thickness is assumed to be very thin. The material is assumed to be an isotropic and homogeneous material.Figure 1
Geometry of PEC wedge configuration including edges and corner.Wiener-Hopf (W-H) and Maliuzhinets (MZ) methods are used in the previous works dealing with the analytical solutions for diffraction by canonical material discontinuities [2–4]. These previous works primarily address the scattering problem in which the illumination is a uniform plane wave that is an incident on the thin material discontinuity. Among related previous works, which is described in [3], one provides a solution to the problem of the plane wave diffraction by a two-dimensional (2-D) impedance wedge. All of these solutions [2–4] are not relatively simple to use thereby making it unwieldy for engineering applications. In contrast, the works in [5–7] are very useful not only to the analysis of scattering situations but also to antenna problems which are equally important from a practical standpoint. The work in [6, 7] incorporates plane, cylindrical, spherical, and surface wave illumination as well as sources which can be placed directly on a planar material junction on PEC ground plane. This is a 2.5 dimensional (2.5-D) configuration, which has an edge infinitely extended. It is noted that the full 3-D configuration has all dimensions in a finite number. Therefore, in full 3-D configuration, the corner is formed from the composition of two finite edges. Unfortunately, exact analytical solutions to the above problems of wave diffraction are not currently available in a form suitable and tractable for engineering applications.The UTD work in [1] for a perfectly conducting wedge is heuristically generalized for constructing a UTD solution to describe the diffraction by a material half plane by [8]. The works of [9, 10] are directly extended to study the approximate UTD scattering by a 2-D wedge with impedance boundary conditions. The work in [11, 12] can treat the diffraction by corners of the planar PEC surface. The heuristic works in [13, 14] based on [8] can deal with the non-PEC structure with corners. Recently, the heuristic UTD solution is used for outdoor environment in [15]. The preliminary results of UTD solution for corner and slope diffraction were presented in [16]. It is noted that the major advantages of these heuristic solutions are that they are relatively simple and closed-form expressions which are suitable for engineering applications. Therefore, in this paper, it is of interest to develop a heuristic UTD solution with relatively simple and accurate closed-form expression to deal with the problem of the source (or antenna) placed in the presence of edges and corners in material-coated platforms such as a material-coated PEC square patch and a material-coated PEC square tower platform. It is expected that the proposed solution can be very useful for antenna engineers to design multiple antennas with an electrically large complex material-coated platform.


## 2. Procedure

The geometry of a corner on a PEC wedge can be shown in Figure1. The total field E¯tot for this problem includes incident E¯i, reflected E¯r, edge-diffracted E¯d, and corner-diffracted E¯c fields which can be written as
(1)E¯tot=E¯i+E¯r+E¯d+E¯c,where the E¯d is well known UTD edge-diffracted field [1] which can be written as
(2)E¯d=D̿E¯is′ss′+se−jks.E¯c denotes the corner-diffracted field [12] which can be written as
(3)E¯c=D̿cE¯i×e−jπ/42πks′s″s′+s″ss+scscsinβcsinβ0ccosβ0c−cosβc×FkLcaπ−β0c−βce−jkss.The UTD edge and corner diffraction coefficient are given by(4)D̿=ADϕ−ϕ′+BDϕ+ϕ′,D̿c=ACϕ−ϕ′+BCϕ+ϕ′.Matrices A and B account for the GO discontinuities at the incident shadow boundary (ISB) and reflection shadow boundary (RSB), respectively. In the case of a PEC wedge, A and B matrices are given by(5)A=−100−1,B=100−1.Dx in (2) is given by
(6)Dx=−e−jπ/42n2πksinβ0cotπ+x2nFkLa+x+cotπ−x2nFkLa−x,and Cx in (4) is given by
(7)Cx=−e−jπ/42n2πksinβ0cotπ+x2nFkLa+xFLa+x/λkLcaπ+β0c−βc+cotπ−x2nFkLa−FLa−x/λkLcaπ+β0c−βc.The rest of the parameters in equations (2)–(7) can be found in [13]. To verify the accuracy, it is of interest to use the proposed UTD solution to solve EM diffraction on the edges and corners of a PEC square patch for the case where the corner of square patch n is set to be 2 excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna as shown in Figure 2. The location of the dipole is h and the width of square patch is w. The radiation pattern at a distance of 100λ for h = 1λ, w = 4λ, and ϕ = 20° is shown in Figure 3.Figure 2
PEC square patch excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna.Figure 3
Total field in theϕ = 5°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz.From the dashed line of Figure3, there are two discontinuities, namely, at ISB (around 115°) and at 90°. The first one at ISB (around 115°) occurred because the incident field from a dipole has a rapid spatial variation at the ISB. This discontinuity can be fixed by adding the slope diffraction [17], which can be written as
(8)E¯ds=1jk∂D̿∂ϕ′∂E¯iQE∂ns′ss′+se−jkss.The total field with the slope-diffracted field can be shown in the solid line of Figure3. The slope-diffracted field peeks up at reflection shadow boundary and incident shadow boundary to compensate the rapid spatial variation at both ISB and RSB. Luckily, at RSB, the reflected field is not a rapid variation; thus, there is no discontinuity. However, for the material-coated PEC surface, the slope diffraction can be done via [5].From Figure3, it is found that the second discontinuity occurs at 90° and it can be fixed by including the double diffraction as shown in Figure 4, which can be given by
(9)E¯dd=D̿E¯dQ1s′ss′+se−jkss.Figure 4
Double diffraction for PEC square patch excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna.Therefore, the total field can be written as the superposition of incident, reflected, edge-diffracted, corner-diffracted, double-diffracted, and slope-diffracted fields such that(10)E¯tot=E¯i+E¯r+E¯d+E¯c+E¯dd+E¯ds.The total field from Figure2 can be shown in Figure 5. It can be observed that the double-diffracted field peaks up at 90° to fix the discontinuous problem. The total field is continuous at 90° as shown in Figure 5.Figure 5
Total field and double-diffracted field in theϕ = 20°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz.To verify the accuracy of the UTD solution, the result of a half-wave length dipole antenna above PEC square patches is calculated by using the UTD solution and compared with simulation result from computer software. The amplitude and phase of electric field of theθ component (copolarized) are shown in Figures 6 and 7, respectively. Also, the amplitude and phase of electric field of the ϕ component (cross-polarized) are shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively. It is found that the results from the θ component agree well with those from simulation but there are some discrepancies in the ϕ component because the cross-polarized one provides very small field strength (below −20 dB) where the proposed UTD in (10) cannot take into account those small contributions. The higher order term such as triple diffraction is needed.Figure 6
Amplitude of electric field of theθ component in the ϕ = 20°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 7
Phase of electric field of theθ component in the ϕ = 20°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 8
Amplitude of electric field of theϕ component in the ϕ = 20°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 9
Phase of electric field of theϕ component in the ϕ = 20°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.It is noted that from the result in Figure9 of [12], the radiation pattern at a distance 64λ for h = 1λ, w = 4λ, ϕ = 135°, and 0° < θ < 180° and discontinuity at grazing θ = 90° can be removed by introducing higher order contributions, like double diffraction rays. In this case, when the double-diffracted field is added, the new total field is continuous at 90° as shown in Figure 10.Figure 10
Absolute value of electric field in theϕ = 45°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.In this paper, two examples of a complex platform, excited by a half-wave length dipole, are analyzed, namely, a material-coated PEC square patch and material-coated PEC square tower platform. It is noted that this UTD solution can deal with all kinds of excitations. Thus, the antenna or source is not restricted to the half-wave length dipole antenna. Let us consider the first example of a material-coated PEC square patch excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna as shown in Figure11. The material type is FR-4 with εr = 4.3, μr = 1, thickness τ0 = λ/50, h = 1λ, and w = 4λ. The observation distance is 100λ at ϕ = 40°. Equations (1)–(10) for PEC solution can be used by heuristically replacing the A and B matrices by
(11)A=−100−1,B=Tϕ′Rϕ′Tϕ′,where
(12)Tϕ′=cosβ0sinϕ′−cosϕ′cosϕ′cosβ0sinϕ′,Rϕ′=RMϕ′00REϕ′,
(13)RM,E=sinϕ′−δM,E/sinβosinϕ′+δM,E/sinβo,δM=jZdNdtankdNdτo,δE=−jYdNdcotkdNdτo,(14)Zd=μrεr,yd=1Zd,kd=kμrεr,Nd=1−η1−sin2ϕ′sin2βo,η=1μrεr.Figure 11
Material-coated PEC square patch excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna.The rest of the parameters in equation (13) can be found in [18].


## 3. Numerical Results

The radiation patterns from calculation compared with those from simulation consisting of the amplitude and phase of electric field of theθ component (copolarized) are shown in Figures 12 and 13, respectively. Also, the amplitude and phase of electric field of the ϕ component (cross-polarized) are shown in Figures 14 and 15, respectively. The results from the proposed UTD agree well with those from simulation for the θ component (copolarized). However, the results of the ϕ component (cross-polarized) is expected to be very small, which is below −20 dB as shown in Figures 14 and 15. Therefore, there are some discrepancies in the ϕ component (cross-polarized) of Figures 14 and 15 between 60 and 120 degrees due to rounded-off errors from calculation. In addition, there are discontinuities in that region because it is very difficult for the transition function Fx to compensate the discontinuities which is smaller than −20 dB. This is a limitation of this heuristic solution.Figure 12
Amplitude of electric field of theθ component in the ϕ = 40°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 13
Phase of electric field of theθ component in the ϕ = 40°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 14
Amplitude of electric field of theϕ component in the ϕ = 40°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Figure 15
Phase of electric field of theϕ component in the ϕ = 40°plane with w = 4λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.Next, let us consider the second example, material-coated PEC square tower platform, excited by a half-wavelength dipole antenna, shown in Figure16 with h = 1λ and w = 10λ. The observation distance is 1000λ at ϕ = 40°. The platform height is set to be infinite for the UTD solution but the height of the platform is just 100λ in the simulation because it is not possible to model an infinite height of the platform. The radiation patterns from UTD and simulation are shown in Figure 17. It is found that the result from UTD agrees well with the simulation result except when the observation angle is beyond 140° due to the effect finite height of the platform, which can occur in the deep shadow region. It can be expected that if the finite height of the platform is taken into account in the UTD solution, the result should agree well with the simulation. The total computational time of simulation was 51 minutes and 4 seconds, but it is only a few seconds for that of the UTD solution. The computer specification is CPU Intel(R) core (TM) i5-6500 3.2 GHz memory (RAM) 16.0 GB.Figure 16
Material-coated PEC square tower platform excited by a simple half-wavelength dipole antenna.Figure 17
Absolute value of electric field in theϕ = 40°plane with w = 10λ and h = 1λ, at 4 GHz compared with simulation result.It is noted that the thicknessτ0 of the material coated in the proposed UTD is assumed to be very thin. Therefore, the thickness of material coated τ0 equals to λ/50 or 0.02λ for all of the results above. It is of interest to show the criterion of the proposed UTD solution regarding the thickness of material coated with variations of thickness by fixing ϕ = 45°, h = 1λ, w = 4λ, εr = 4.3, and μr = 1. The accuracy of the proposed solution is investigated by comparing the numerical results from the proposed UTD solution with the results from simulation via the root mean square error: RMSE as shown in Figure 18.
(15)%RMSE=∑i=1NZfi−ZOi2N×100,where Zfi denotes the numerical result from simulation while ZOi is from the proposed UTD solution. N is the number of data points.Figure 18
Accuracy of the proposed UTD solution when comparing with the numerical results from simulation versus the variation of thickness of material coated.It is found from Figure18 that the numerical error is increased when the thickness of material coated increased. This plot can be a guideline to use this solution for any engineering applications. For example, if one prefers the error less than 5%, the thickness should be less than 0.04λ or λ/25.


## 4. Conclusion

The closed-form heuristic UTD solution including edge diffraction, corner diffraction, double diffraction, and slope diffraction for antenna problem with a complex platform is proposed in this work. The proposed heuristic UTD solution can be used to solve a finite PEC platform with excitation from an antenna. The accuracy of the UTD is verified by simulation results from computer software. It is found that the proposed UTD solution is easy to use and the accuracy of the developed UTD solution is good enough for engineering application.



---

*Source: 9484836-2019-01-29.xml*