# Preparation and Properties of Agricultural Residuals-Iron Concentrate Pellets

Authors: Zhulin Liu; Xuegong Bi; Zeping Gao; Yayu Wang
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

In this paper, carbon-containing pellets were prepared by using crop-derived charcoal made from agricultural residuals and iron ore concentrates, and their pelletizing performance and properties were studied. Experimental results showed that the strengths of pellets were related to the particle size of concentrates and the content of moisture, bentonite, and crop-derived charcoal fines in the pelletizing mixture and the temperature of roasting and reduction. That the granularity of raw materials was fine and the bentonite content increased was beneficial to the improvement of pellet strengths. The suitable molar ratio of carbon to oxygen was 1.0 and the proper proportioning ratios of moisture and binder were 8.0% and 6.5%, respectively. The pellet strengths increased accordingly with increasing the reduction temperature, and when the temperature reached 1200°C, accompanied by the fast reduction of iron and the formation of crystal stock, the dropping strength of product pellets was 15 times and the compressive strength was 1650 N; this may be improved by grinding of the concentrate, leading to acceptable strength for the blast furnace.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The sustainable development of the steel industry is severely restricted by natural resources, energy supply capacity, and the earth environmental bearing capacity [1]. Crops are artificial plants and grow and develop by absorbing CO2 in the atmosphere and utilizing solar energy. Therefore, crops waste not only is a renewable energy, but also could not additionally increase CO2 in the atmosphere during combustion; it is completely carbon neutral, that is, has a feature of zero CO2 emission [2].Further, because the ash generated by biomass combustion appears to be alkaline, it is possible to restrain the formation of contaminants such as SO2, NOx, and so on [3]. Moreover, burning in the open air of a large number of surplus crop straw will produce a great deal of gases and aerosol components. This will not only lead to a great waste of resources and destroy soil fertility, but also bring about serious air pollution [4]. Therefore, the application of crop wastes will improve the ecological environment. China owns extremely abundant biomass resources; the output of residues from forests and agricultural industry is 2 billion 29 million tons per annum. There mainly are crops straw, forestry residues, livestock manures, and energy crops [5]. The carbon content in wheat and corn straws is about 40% while that in rice husk accounts for 43% [6].The product of crop wastes carbonization is essentially the same with charcoal in respect to chemical composition, being based on carbon and also having hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and a few other elements, but very low ash and sulphur. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce iron ores with crop wastes [7, 8]. More importantly, to substitute agricultural and forestry biomass charcoal for coal for producing carbon-bearing pellets can not only realize the reuse of wastes and protect the environment, but also save coal and mitigate CO2 emission [9].Babich et al. [10] studied charcoal behavior by its injection into the modern blast furnace. Specific surface area was measured with BET technique and the results showed that specific surface area of charcoals (150~350 m2/g) is 60~350 times greater than that for PC (1.0~2.6 m2/g). This result is coincident with the higher reactivity that was determined by the Simultaneous Thermal Analysis (Netzsch, STA 409) method, the pilot injection plant test, and the coke bed simulator experiment. Pore characteristics were quantified by optical microscope with Soft Imaging Analysis. The overall porosity varies between 1/3 and 1/2 among the charcoal samples, but for PC no pores were identified. Although there are so far few measured data of porosity, surface area and reactivity for crop-derived charcoal were reported; it can be reasonably presumed that crop-derived charcoal is also superior to PC in terms of these three qualities.Mathieson et al. [11] analyzed the potential for biomass-derived charcoal to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian steel industry and proposed many applications such as sintering solid fuel, cokemaking blend component, BF tuyere fuel injectant, BF nut coke replacement, BF carbon/ore composites of BOF prereduced feed, and steelmaking recarburiser. Actually, as early as in the 1980s, aiming at the application of abundant tropical forest resources in Brazil, Martins et al. [12] made a preliminary study on sponge iron production by using green pellets made of iron ores and charcoal mix. The binders used in their research consisted of water glass, lime, and cement. Hayashi and Iguchi [13] studied the possibility of partly substituting cedar flour for coal to produce carbon composite iron ore hot briquettes. Nakano et al. [14] have proposed that unreduced carbon-ore composite pellets or briquettes be added as blast furnace feed and manufactured nonspherical carbon composite in lab-scale. In their study on charcoal composite iron oxide pellets, Konishi et al. [15] derived charcoal from Japanese cypress and mixed it into Fe2O3 agent of 98% purity pellets at a ratio of 1/4 with an addition of 3 mass% bentonite. And then pellets of about 10 mm in diameter were manually made and reduced at 1273, 1373, and 1473 K in N2 gas atmosphere. More recently, Li et al. [16] added straw fiber (without carbonization) to substitute for coal into South African iron ore for the preparation of metallized pellets. Pellets sized 22∗10 mm were produced under 20 MPa pressure without heating and binder addition. It was demonstrated that the strength of green pellets met the requirement of Rotary Hearth Furnace process. It is noted that there are few reports in the literature so far on the preparation and properties of crop-derived charcoal containing iron ore pellets.In this work, feasibility of preparation of carbon composite iron ore pellets by using crop-derived charcoal was assessed and appropriate technological conditions were experimentally determined.


## 2. Test Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Chemical and Size Compositions of Concentrate

The raw materials for pellets preparation were concentrates provided by Hualing Xiangtan Iron and Steel Corporation (Group); the chemical composition is shown in Table1. The reducing agent was self-made crop-derived charcoal; the composition is shown in Table 2. The binder used was bentonite; the composition is shown in Table 3.Table 1
Chemical composition of concentrate.
Component
T.Fe
S
P
SiO2
FeO
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
MnO
H2O
I.L.
Mass%
60.67
0.11
0.05
12.00
9.23
1.07
0.50
1.00
0.33
10.96
−1.30
Note. I.L. is ignition loss.Table 2
Approximate analysis of crop-derived charcoal.
Component
Ad
Vd
FCd
St,d
Mad
Mass%
3.48
32.10
61.82
0.05
2.60
Note. Ad is ash content; Vd is volatile content; FCd is fixed carbon content; St,d is total sulfur content; Mad is moisture content.Table 3
Chemical composition of bentonite.
Component
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
SiO2
K2O
Na2O
I.L.
Mass%
12.65
1.02
4.19
53.25
0.43
0.30
14.39The crop-derive charcoal was prepared from rice husk and peanut shell through crushing, molding, and low temperature carbonization (300~350°C) for the purpose of including more residual volatile matter.The cumulative size distribution curve of concentrate is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Cumulative size distribution of concentrate.As can be seen from Figure1, the size of this concentrate was a little too coarse for pelletizing ores; the cumulative percentage of minus 0.04 mm approximately accounted for 30% and that of minus 0.074 mm approximately accounted for only 80%. As can be seen from Table 2, the fixed carbon content in the self-made crop-derived charcoal was relatively low at only 61.82% while the volatile content was as high as 32.10%. The reason is that the blocks made of crop wastes were relatively large, the carbonization temperature was lower, and the time was shorter, resulting in an insufficient carbonization. However, the ash content of biochar was only 3.48%, which is favorable to the reduction of flux consumption and to the smelting of low Si content pig iron [17]. As can been seen in Table 3 that the MgO content in bentonite was relatively high, it belongs to Ca-based bentonite with a poorer bonding capacity.


### 2.2. Test Method

In the experiment, a vacuum heating furnace was used for carbonizing the collected crop wastes such as peanut hull and rice husk. After carbonization, they were crushed and ground. The concentrate and self-made crop-derived charcoal fines were, respectively, screened with 150, 180, and 200 mesh sieves; the obtained materials of corresponding sizes were used for pelletizing. The diameter of green balls was 8~12 mm. In the tests, the water content of green balls was designated as 7.5%, 8.0%, and 8.5%. By taking into account the fact that the addition of crop-derived charcoal fines will decrease the strength of green balls, bentonite proportioning ratio was set as 6%, 6.5%, and 7%. According to investigation results of other researchers [18, 19], the molar ratio of carbon to oxygen (C/O ratio) usually is around one. In this experiment, C/O ratio was assigned as 0.9, 1.0, and 1.1; the corresponding material ratios calculated are seen in Table 4. The measurements of pelletizing performance mainly included the compressive strength, dropping strength, and shock temperature of green balls.Table 4
Material ratios of carbon-bearing pellets, mass%.
Test number
Size of concentrate and char/mesh
C/O—
Concentrate
Crop-derived charcoal
Binder
H2O
1
200
0.9
67.9
18.6
6.0
7.5
2
200
1.0
65.6
19.9
6.5
8.0
3
200
1.1
63.4
21.1
7.0
8.5
4
180
0.9
66.8
18.2
6.5
8.5
5
180
1.0
65.6
19.9
7.0
7.5
6
180
1.1
64.5
21.5
6.0
8.0
7
150
0.9
66.8
18.2
7.0
8.0
8
150
1.0
65.6
19.9
6.0
8.5
9
150
1.1
64.5
21.5
6.5
7.5Measurement of the dropping strength of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter are selected at pleasure and dropped onto a steel sheet of 10 mm in thickness, the height of dropping is 500 mm, and the mean value of the number of dropping where there appeared flaws in any green ball or it broke into pieces is taken as the dropping strength of green balls in this test.Measurement of the compressive strength of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter are picked at random, they are pressed vertically at a compression speed not exceeding 10 mm/min, and the mean value of the exerted loads where flaws appeared in any green ball is taken as the compressive strength of green balls in this test.Measurement of the shock temperature of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter were selected at random, and, in the tubular furnace with a 320 to 520°C temperature range, the temperature where the percentage of green balls that generated flaws inside achieves 10% is measured and taken as the shock temperature of green balls.


## 2.1. Chemical and Size Compositions of Concentrate

The raw materials for pellets preparation were concentrates provided by Hualing Xiangtan Iron and Steel Corporation (Group); the chemical composition is shown in Table1. The reducing agent was self-made crop-derived charcoal; the composition is shown in Table 2. The binder used was bentonite; the composition is shown in Table 3.Table 1
Chemical composition of concentrate.
Component
T.Fe
S
P
SiO2
FeO
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
MnO
H2O
I.L.
Mass%
60.67
0.11
0.05
12.00
9.23
1.07
0.50
1.00
0.33
10.96
−1.30
Note. I.L. is ignition loss.Table 2
Approximate analysis of crop-derived charcoal.
Component
Ad
Vd
FCd
St,d
Mad
Mass%
3.48
32.10
61.82
0.05
2.60
Note. Ad is ash content; Vd is volatile content; FCd is fixed carbon content; St,d is total sulfur content; Mad is moisture content.Table 3
Chemical composition of bentonite.
Component
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
SiO2
K2O
Na2O
I.L.
Mass%
12.65
1.02
4.19
53.25
0.43
0.30
14.39The crop-derive charcoal was prepared from rice husk and peanut shell through crushing, molding, and low temperature carbonization (300~350°C) for the purpose of including more residual volatile matter.The cumulative size distribution curve of concentrate is shown in Figure1.Figure 1
Cumulative size distribution of concentrate.As can be seen from Figure1, the size of this concentrate was a little too coarse for pelletizing ores; the cumulative percentage of minus 0.04 mm approximately accounted for 30% and that of minus 0.074 mm approximately accounted for only 80%. As can be seen from Table 2, the fixed carbon content in the self-made crop-derived charcoal was relatively low at only 61.82% while the volatile content was as high as 32.10%. The reason is that the blocks made of crop wastes were relatively large, the carbonization temperature was lower, and the time was shorter, resulting in an insufficient carbonization. However, the ash content of biochar was only 3.48%, which is favorable to the reduction of flux consumption and to the smelting of low Si content pig iron [17]. As can been seen in Table 3 that the MgO content in bentonite was relatively high, it belongs to Ca-based bentonite with a poorer bonding capacity.


## 2.2. Test Method

In the experiment, a vacuum heating furnace was used for carbonizing the collected crop wastes such as peanut hull and rice husk. After carbonization, they were crushed and ground. The concentrate and self-made crop-derived charcoal fines were, respectively, screened with 150, 180, and 200 mesh sieves; the obtained materials of corresponding sizes were used for pelletizing. The diameter of green balls was 8~12 mm. In the tests, the water content of green balls was designated as 7.5%, 8.0%, and 8.5%. By taking into account the fact that the addition of crop-derived charcoal fines will decrease the strength of green balls, bentonite proportioning ratio was set as 6%, 6.5%, and 7%. According to investigation results of other researchers [18, 19], the molar ratio of carbon to oxygen (C/O ratio) usually is around one. In this experiment, C/O ratio was assigned as 0.9, 1.0, and 1.1; the corresponding material ratios calculated are seen in Table 4. The measurements of pelletizing performance mainly included the compressive strength, dropping strength, and shock temperature of green balls.Table 4
Material ratios of carbon-bearing pellets, mass%.
Test number
Size of concentrate and char/mesh
C/O—
Concentrate
Crop-derived charcoal
Binder
H2O
1
200
0.9
67.9
18.6
6.0
7.5
2
200
1.0
65.6
19.9
6.5
8.0
3
200
1.1
63.4
21.1
7.0
8.5
4
180
0.9
66.8
18.2
6.5
8.5
5
180
1.0
65.6
19.9
7.0
7.5
6
180
1.1
64.5
21.5
6.0
8.0
7
150
0.9
66.8
18.2
7.0
8.0
8
150
1.0
65.6
19.9
6.0
8.5
9
150
1.1
64.5
21.5
6.5
7.5Measurement of the dropping strength of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter are selected at pleasure and dropped onto a steel sheet of 10 mm in thickness, the height of dropping is 500 mm, and the mean value of the number of dropping where there appeared flaws in any green ball or it broke into pieces is taken as the dropping strength of green balls in this test.Measurement of the compressive strength of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter are picked at random, they are pressed vertically at a compression speed not exceeding 10 mm/min, and the mean value of the exerted loads where flaws appeared in any green ball is taken as the compressive strength of green balls in this test.Measurement of the shock temperature of green balls: in each test, ten green balls of 10~12 mm in diameter were selected at random, and, in the tubular furnace with a 320 to 520°C temperature range, the temperature where the percentage of green balls that generated flaws inside achieves 10% is measured and taken as the shock temperature of green balls.


## 3. Test Results and Analysis

### 3.1. Properties and Their Analysis of Carbon-Containing Green Balls

After the disc pelletizer started running, the pelletizing mixture accounting for about one-third of the total weight of green balls was firstly added and water was dropped with a bottle onto the materials to form seed balls. The size of seed balls was controlled at around 2 mm, and it was also required that the grain size was uniform. After seed balls formed, mist water was sprayed while materials were added according to the situation of balls growing. When most green balls grew up to 8~12 mm in diameter, it was stopped to add materials into the disc pelletizer and the pelletizer continued running for 3~5 min. The green balls properties of nine tests are shown in Figures2 and 3.Figure 2
The dropping strength and compressive strength of green balls.Figure 3
The shock temperature of green balls.As can be seen from Figures2 and 3, the quality of green balls dropping strength of test number 2 and the quality of green balls compressive strength of test number 3 were the best, respectively, achieving 4.3 times the dropping strength and 13.4 N compressive strength. However, the green balls shock temperature of test number 3 was only 340°C, unfavorable to the high temperature reduction and calcination of pellets.Making a comprehensive comparison, the overall property of test number 2 was the best: the dropping and compressive strengths were 4.2 times and 12.8 N, respectively, and the shock temperature could reach 420°C. The size of raw materials of test number 2 was 200 mesh, C/O ratio was 1.0, binder blending ratio was 6.5%, and H2O content was 8%.The size of raw materials of the first three tests was smaller and accordingly the dropping strength and compressive strength were higher. The finer the raw materials size, the higher the surface free energy and, after water addition for lubrication, the smaller the diameter of the capillaries generated. The greater the capillary force, the stronger the binding force, and thus the dropping strength as well as the compressive strengths would increase.Generally speaking, the dropping and compressive strengths of green balls increase with increasing the content of bentonite binder. The supper fine particles in bentonite and concentrate form gelatinous substance, and this kind of colloids fills up among iron ore particles, playing a good role of adhesive bridges. In addition, after absorbing moister, bentonite forms a colloid, which has a gelatinous structure of a “card room” type 3D network form. This gelatinous structure could improve the viscous resistance and shear strength of binding bridges, and thus increase the dropping strength, compressive strength, and shock temperature.Why the shock temperature of test number 3 appeared abnormal is probably because C/O ratio was higher and crop-derived charcoal contained more volatile matters; thus the volatilization of volatile matters would be the primary cause that leads to green balls bursting and decreases the shock temperature. Similarly, due to the higher C/O ratios, the shock temperature of tests number 6 and number 9 were decreased in different extents, but number 9 is actually still quite strong.


### 3.2. Metallized Pellets Properties and Analysis

For studying the effect of temperature on the reduction property of pellets, after drying at 110°C, the green balls with 1.0 C/O ratio of test number 2 were isothermally autoreduced for 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, respectively, at various temperatures and under the condition of nitrogen protection.In the weight loss of carbon-containing pellets, apart from oxygen loss, the carbon loss, the amount of volatile matters separated, and remaining water vaporized are also included. In this paper, the modified weight loss approach was utilized, that is, by taking carbon-containing alumina balls as a reference, to indirectly measure the separation ratio of volatile matters and water and to evaluate the degree of reduction with (1), which originated from a reference and was modified in this work.(1)R=47MOfΣ-fA-PW×100,%,where MO is oxygen amount in iron oxides, g; fΣ is the percentage of total weight loss, %; fA-P is the percentage of weight loss of volatile matters and moisture in carbon-containing alumina balls, %; W is the weight of carbon-containing pellets, g.The maximum weight loss rate and the reduction degree at 20 min were obtained as shown in Table5. The plots of reduction degree against time are described in Figure 4.Table 5
Results of carbon-bearing pellets reduction at different temperatures.
Temperature, °C
Weight loss rate at 20 min, %
Reduction degree at 20 min, %
1000
27.36
66.76
1100
32.21
80.56
1200
34.79
88.66
1300
34.86
88.85Figure 4
Reduction degree of carbon-bearing pellets versus time.It can be seen from Table5 and Figure 4 that, for carbon-bearing pellets, the maximum reduction degree and the maximum weight loss rate at 1200°C and 1300°C are all essentially identical. This is presumably because the porosity of crop-derived charcoal fines is relatively large, having bigger areas of reaction and also possessing higher degree of CO2 reaction compared to PC; see Section 1, and with the addition of reduction by the CO and H2 in abundant volatile matters, the reduction process could rapidly proceed at only 1200°C. Over 1200°C, however, further increasing temperature had no great raising effect on the reduction extent of pellets. It is true that the reduction degree of pellets increased with temperature increasing, but, from the economic point of view, the appropriate reduction temperature of these carbon-containing pellets would be 1200°C, with a reduction time of 15 min.Green balls of the above-mentioned nine tests were treated isothermally at 900°C for 20 min; at this moment, direct reduction had not taken place in quantity in the pellets, and dropping and compressive strengths were measured. Again, the green balls were isothermally treated at 1200°C for 20 min, metallized pellets were obtained by reduction, and dropping strength and compressive strength were measured and shown in Figures5 and 6, respectively.Figure 5
The dropping strength of pellets after reduction.Figure 6
The compressive strength of pellets after reduction.It can be seen from Figures5 and 6 that, under the condition of 1200°C, the dropping and compressive strengths of metallized pellets of each test are all higher than the pellets of their corresponding tests which were obtained under the condition of 900°C reduction temperature and had lower extents of direct reduction. The highest dropping strength and compressive strength of pellets reduced at 1200°C were 15 times and 1900 N. The best was the pellets of test number 2 in respect to comprehensive properties; their dropping strength and compressive strength were 15 times and 1650 N, respectively.Reduction temperature has a positive impact on increasing the postreduction strength of pellets, and thus a lower temperature will bring about various physicochemical reactions proceeded slowly; above all, for carbon-containing pellets that give priority to the direct reduction, it is hard to achieve the consolidation effect. As temperature increases and the direct reduction reaction proceeds, more metallic iron forms and the metallic iron sinters increasing pellet strength.


### 3.3. Consideration of How to Decrease the Blending Ratio of Bentonite

As shown in Table4, the blending ratio of bentonite in this work was rather high, ranging from 6.0 to 7.5 mass%, which will bring about a higher production cost of pellets and a lower iron grade of pellets, meaning a higher slag volume and a greater fuel consumption of the blast furnace. The main reason why so much bentonite has to be proportioned into the pelletizing mixture is, in comparison with pulverized coal, crop-derived charcoal is poor in hydrophilia and ballability. The secondary cause is the blending ratio of charcoal being necessarily higher for a given C/O ratio, due to its lower carbon content and its lower density. As a consequence, the bulk density of pelletizing mixture is smaller and the voidage between material particles is larger; thus more binder has to be blended.There are some potential countermeasures [20] to solve this problem, including reducing the concentrate size to 325 mesh with use of the technique of wet-grinding or high-pressure roller grinding, applying alkali-based bentonite of higher efficiency, and partly blending organic binders. This is the subject of future work.


## 3.1. Properties and Their Analysis of Carbon-Containing Green Balls

After the disc pelletizer started running, the pelletizing mixture accounting for about one-third of the total weight of green balls was firstly added and water was dropped with a bottle onto the materials to form seed balls. The size of seed balls was controlled at around 2 mm, and it was also required that the grain size was uniform. After seed balls formed, mist water was sprayed while materials were added according to the situation of balls growing. When most green balls grew up to 8~12 mm in diameter, it was stopped to add materials into the disc pelletizer and the pelletizer continued running for 3~5 min. The green balls properties of nine tests are shown in Figures2 and 3.Figure 2
The dropping strength and compressive strength of green balls.Figure 3
The shock temperature of green balls.As can be seen from Figures2 and 3, the quality of green balls dropping strength of test number 2 and the quality of green balls compressive strength of test number 3 were the best, respectively, achieving 4.3 times the dropping strength and 13.4 N compressive strength. However, the green balls shock temperature of test number 3 was only 340°C, unfavorable to the high temperature reduction and calcination of pellets.Making a comprehensive comparison, the overall property of test number 2 was the best: the dropping and compressive strengths were 4.2 times and 12.8 N, respectively, and the shock temperature could reach 420°C. The size of raw materials of test number 2 was 200 mesh, C/O ratio was 1.0, binder blending ratio was 6.5%, and H2O content was 8%.The size of raw materials of the first three tests was smaller and accordingly the dropping strength and compressive strength were higher. The finer the raw materials size, the higher the surface free energy and, after water addition for lubrication, the smaller the diameter of the capillaries generated. The greater the capillary force, the stronger the binding force, and thus the dropping strength as well as the compressive strengths would increase.Generally speaking, the dropping and compressive strengths of green balls increase with increasing the content of bentonite binder. The supper fine particles in bentonite and concentrate form gelatinous substance, and this kind of colloids fills up among iron ore particles, playing a good role of adhesive bridges. In addition, after absorbing moister, bentonite forms a colloid, which has a gelatinous structure of a “card room” type 3D network form. This gelatinous structure could improve the viscous resistance and shear strength of binding bridges, and thus increase the dropping strength, compressive strength, and shock temperature.Why the shock temperature of test number 3 appeared abnormal is probably because C/O ratio was higher and crop-derived charcoal contained more volatile matters; thus the volatilization of volatile matters would be the primary cause that leads to green balls bursting and decreases the shock temperature. Similarly, due to the higher C/O ratios, the shock temperature of tests number 6 and number 9 were decreased in different extents, but number 9 is actually still quite strong.


## 3.2. Metallized Pellets Properties and Analysis

For studying the effect of temperature on the reduction property of pellets, after drying at 110°C, the green balls with 1.0 C/O ratio of test number 2 were isothermally autoreduced for 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, respectively, at various temperatures and under the condition of nitrogen protection.In the weight loss of carbon-containing pellets, apart from oxygen loss, the carbon loss, the amount of volatile matters separated, and remaining water vaporized are also included. In this paper, the modified weight loss approach was utilized, that is, by taking carbon-containing alumina balls as a reference, to indirectly measure the separation ratio of volatile matters and water and to evaluate the degree of reduction with (1), which originated from a reference and was modified in this work.(1)R=47MOfΣ-fA-PW×100,%,where MO is oxygen amount in iron oxides, g; fΣ is the percentage of total weight loss, %; fA-P is the percentage of weight loss of volatile matters and moisture in carbon-containing alumina balls, %; W is the weight of carbon-containing pellets, g.The maximum weight loss rate and the reduction degree at 20 min were obtained as shown in Table5. The plots of reduction degree against time are described in Figure 4.Table 5
Results of carbon-bearing pellets reduction at different temperatures.
Temperature, °C
Weight loss rate at 20 min, %
Reduction degree at 20 min, %
1000
27.36
66.76
1100
32.21
80.56
1200
34.79
88.66
1300
34.86
88.85Figure 4
Reduction degree of carbon-bearing pellets versus time.It can be seen from Table5 and Figure 4 that, for carbon-bearing pellets, the maximum reduction degree and the maximum weight loss rate at 1200°C and 1300°C are all essentially identical. This is presumably because the porosity of crop-derived charcoal fines is relatively large, having bigger areas of reaction and also possessing higher degree of CO2 reaction compared to PC; see Section 1, and with the addition of reduction by the CO and H2 in abundant volatile matters, the reduction process could rapidly proceed at only 1200°C. Over 1200°C, however, further increasing temperature had no great raising effect on the reduction extent of pellets. It is true that the reduction degree of pellets increased with temperature increasing, but, from the economic point of view, the appropriate reduction temperature of these carbon-containing pellets would be 1200°C, with a reduction time of 15 min.Green balls of the above-mentioned nine tests were treated isothermally at 900°C for 20 min; at this moment, direct reduction had not taken place in quantity in the pellets, and dropping and compressive strengths were measured. Again, the green balls were isothermally treated at 1200°C for 20 min, metallized pellets were obtained by reduction, and dropping strength and compressive strength were measured and shown in Figures5 and 6, respectively.Figure 5
The dropping strength of pellets after reduction.Figure 6
The compressive strength of pellets after reduction.It can be seen from Figures5 and 6 that, under the condition of 1200°C, the dropping and compressive strengths of metallized pellets of each test are all higher than the pellets of their corresponding tests which were obtained under the condition of 900°C reduction temperature and had lower extents of direct reduction. The highest dropping strength and compressive strength of pellets reduced at 1200°C were 15 times and 1900 N. The best was the pellets of test number 2 in respect to comprehensive properties; their dropping strength and compressive strength were 15 times and 1650 N, respectively.Reduction temperature has a positive impact on increasing the postreduction strength of pellets, and thus a lower temperature will bring about various physicochemical reactions proceeded slowly; above all, for carbon-containing pellets that give priority to the direct reduction, it is hard to achieve the consolidation effect. As temperature increases and the direct reduction reaction proceeds, more metallic iron forms and the metallic iron sinters increasing pellet strength.


## 3.3. Consideration of How to Decrease the Blending Ratio of Bentonite

As shown in Table4, the blending ratio of bentonite in this work was rather high, ranging from 6.0 to 7.5 mass%, which will bring about a higher production cost of pellets and a lower iron grade of pellets, meaning a higher slag volume and a greater fuel consumption of the blast furnace. The main reason why so much bentonite has to be proportioned into the pelletizing mixture is, in comparison with pulverized coal, crop-derived charcoal is poor in hydrophilia and ballability. The secondary cause is the blending ratio of charcoal being necessarily higher for a given C/O ratio, due to its lower carbon content and its lower density. As a consequence, the bulk density of pelletizing mixture is smaller and the voidage between material particles is larger; thus more binder has to be blended.There are some potential countermeasures [20] to solve this problem, including reducing the concentrate size to 325 mesh with use of the technique of wet-grinding or high-pressure roller grinding, applying alkali-based bentonite of higher efficiency, and partly blending organic binders. This is the subject of future work.


## 4. Conclusions

(1)
Under the condition that pelletizing time and pelletizer parameters are constant, the properties of carbon-containing pellets are related to the particle size of pelletizing materials, the content of moisture, the amount of bentonite blended, the amount of crop-derived charcoal fines addition, and the temperature of reduction. The finer the raw materials particle size and the higher the binder content, the better the comprehensive performance of pelletizing. The water content needs to be appropriate. Too high a C/O ratio could cause a decrease of the shock temperature of green balls.
(2)
Under the condition that the particle size of concentrate and crop-derived charcoal fines were both 200 mesh, C/O ratio was 1.0, the bentonite content was 6.5%, and water content was 8%, the quality of green balls was better: the dropping strength reached 4.2 times, the compressive strength was 12.8 N, and the shock temperature was 420°C.
(3)
The reduction process of crop-derived charcoal composite iron ore pellet could quickly be conducted at only 1200°C; a 15 min holding time of high temperature was suitable.
(4)
The dropping strength and the compressive strength of metallized pellets obtained by high temperature reduction at 1200°C were all higher than the pellets with lower direct reduction extents that were obtained under the reduction condition of 900°C. The main reason was that the rapid reduction of metallic irons and the formation of a crystal stock between them significantly improved the mechanical strength of pellets. The dropping strength and compressive strength of pellets of test number 2 with a good comprehensive performance were, respectively, 15 times and 1650 N, basically meeting the requirements of blast furnace feed materials in terms of strength.Blast furnace pellets should have an average compression strength of 2500 N. Future work should try to increase this strength.



---

*Source: 9407259-2017-10-22.xml*