# Antithrombotic Effect and Mechanism of Radix Paeoniae Rubra

Authors: Pingyao Xie; Lili Cui; Yuan Shan; Wen-yi Kang
Journal: BioMed Research International
 (2017)

---

## Abstract

The compounds of Radix Paeoniae Rubra (RPR) were isolated and identified by bioassay-guided method, and antithrombotic effects and mechanism were investigated by the acute blood stasis rat model. The RPR extract was evaluated by APTT, TT, PT, and FIB assays in vitro. Results indicated that RPR extract exhibited the anticoagulant activity. In order to find active compounds, six compounds were isolated and identified, and four compounds, paeoniflorin (Pae), pentagalloylglucose (Pen), albiflorin (Ali), and protocatechuic acid (Pro), exhibited the anticoagulant activity in vitro. Therefore, the antithrombosis effects of RPR extract and four active compounds were investigated in vivo by measuring whole blood viscosity (WBV), plasma viscosity (PV), APTT, PT, TT, and FIB. Meanwhile, the levels of TXB2, 6-Keto-PGF1α, eNOS, and ET-1 were detected. Results suggested that RPR extract and four active compounds had the inhibition effect on thrombus formation, and the antithrombotic effects were associated with the regulation of vascular endothelium active substance, activating blood flow and anticoagulation effect.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Thrombosis, the formation or presence of the thrombus in a blood vessel, is a multifactorial disease induced by promoting a combination of stasis and hypercoagulability [1]. Thrombotic diseases, especially heart disease and cerebrovascular thrombosis, have become primary causes of death and their incidence has been increasing each year [2]. It is well known that thrombosis is closely related to activated platelet adhesion, aggregation, secretion functions, and activation of intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation systems, which cause blood coagulation and fibrin formation. Although they have many causes [3], accumulation of thrombus is a key factor in the final analysis.Many traditional Chinese herbal medicines have been used for thousands of years in clinical practice because of their proven efficacy, wide indications, high safety profile, and low toxicity [4]. Then Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) plays an important role in the clinic treatment of blood stasis in China, one of which is the Radix Paeoniae Rubra (RPR), which is the dried root ofPaeonia lactiflora Pall. andP. veitchii Lynch [5]. It had the function of removing pathogenic heat from the blood and treating blood stasis and relieving pain [6, 7].In Traditional Chinese Medicine, thrombotic disorders are described as blood stasis syndrome [8]. Though aspirin has been widely used as antithrombotic medicine in clinical practice, an increasing number of studies have indicated that some patients subpopulations do not respond to the antithrombotic effects of aspirin and may exhibit a degree of aspirin resistance. Therefore, interest in TCM from natural sources as a feasible alternative therapeutic agent for the prevention of blood stasis disorder in patients with “aspirin resistance” is growing [9].RPR has some effects on activating blood circulation to dissipate blood stasis; however, the mechanism has been poorly studied. In this paper, antithrombotic effects and mechanism of extracts and the compounds from the RPR root were investigated.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Plant Materials

The RPR was purchased from Lerentang Pharmacy, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China, and a voucher specimen was identified by Professor Chang-qin Li of Henan University and deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Natural Products, Henan University.


### 2.2. Animals

Male and female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, weighing from 220 to 300 g, and male New Zealand white rabbits from 2.0 to 2.5 kg were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Henan Province (Zhengzhou, Henan, China) (12 h light/dark cycle, 25°C, and humidity 45 to 65%) and were fed with standard rodent diet and water ad libitum. The animal procedures were approved by the ethical committee in accordance with “Institute Ethical Committee Guidelines” for Animal Experimentation and Care. Animals were housed in standard cage.


### 2.3. Chemicals

The following was used: PT, APTT, TT, and FIB Assay Kits (Shanghai Sun Biotech Co., Ltd.); Bovine Fibrinogen (Sigma, USA); Thrombin (Sigma, USA,); Urokinase (Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Macao, and Asia); Agarose (GENE Company); Complex Tablet (Hutchison Whampoa Guangzhou Baiyunshan Chinese Medicine Company Limited, China); Rat Endothelin 1 (ET-1) Elisa Kit; Rat Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Elisa Kit; Rat 6-Keto-PGF1α Elisa Kit; Rat Thromboxane B2 (TXB2) Elisa Kit (Nanjing Sengbiejia Biotech Co., Ltd.).


### 2.4. Extraction and Isolation

Air-dried and powdered roots of RPR (1.9 kg) were extracted with 70% ethanol at 60°C for two times (2 h each time) and then pressure was reduced to yield a viscous gummy material (570 g). The total extract was dissolved in 500 mL of water and then extracted with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, andn-butanol. The PE, EtOAc, and BuOH extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to give 6 g, 29 g, and 81.3 g, respectively. EtOAc extract (29 g) was subjected to silica gel H column chromatography and eluted with dichloromethane-ethyl acetate (100 : 0-0 : 100, v/v) to yield three fractions. The first fraction (4.6 g) was further separated on a silica gel column repeatedly to yield compound1 (123.1 mg). The second fraction (2.3 g) was purified by various column chromatography including silica gel and sephadex LH-20 to yield compound2 (53.5 mg) and compound3 (36.5 mg).n-Butanol extract (81.3 g) was purified on MPLC and then further separated on silica gel H and sephadex LH-20 column chromatography to get compounds4 (31.2 mg),5 (82.9 mg), and6 (38.4 mg), respectively. The six compounds were identified as paeoniflorin (1, Pae), pentagalloylglucose (2, Pen), benzoyl paeoniflorin (3, Ben), oxypaeoniflora (4, Oxy), albiflorin (5, Ali), and protocatechuic acid (6, Pro) by 1H NMR and 13C NMR. All the compounds were performed on HPLC, and the purity was over 98%.


### 2.5. Coagulation Time Test In Vitro

Blood samples were drawn from rabbit’s auricular vein. After collection, the blood was decalcified by sodium citrate to prevent blood clotting, and then serums were separated from the plasma by centrifugation of 3,000 rpm at 5°C for 15 min [10]. APTT and PT were determined according to the literature [11]. In brief, serum (50 μL) was mixed with 25 μL of samples, next APTT assay reagent (50 μL) was added and incubated for 5 min at 37°C, and then 25 mM CaCl2 (100 μL) was added. Clotting times were recorded. Meanwhile, in PT assays, serums (50 μL) mixed with 25 μL of samples were incubated for 3 min at 37°C. PT assay reagent (50 μL), which has been hatched for 10 min at 37°C, was then added and clotting time was recorded. Determination of TT and FIB was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Shanghai Sun Biotech Co., Ltd., China). In the above tests, control solvent was used as control group, and breviscapine and vitamin K1 were used as positive control group. PT, APTT, TT, and FIB assays were conducted by Semiautomated Coagulation Analyzer.


### 2.6. Experimental Model and Drug Administration

Rats were randomly divided into seven groups with eight animals in each, whose gender was equally distributed throughout groups. Group 1 was the control and Group 2 was the model, and rats were given control solvent. Group 3 was model + aspirin (ASP), and rats were given 100 mg/kg ASP. Groups 4–7 were model + drugs, and rats were given 1.2 g/kg RPR extract. All treatments were performed by gavage and were administered seven times with an interval of 12 h.After the fifth administration, model rats groups were placed in ice-cold water during the interval between two injections of adrenaline hydrochloride (Adr) to establish blood stasis model. All other rats were subcutaneously injected with Adr (0.8 mg/kg), except for the control rats, which were injected with 0.9% (w/v) NaCl saline solution. After 2 h, the rats were kept in ice-cold water (0–2°C) for 5 min and then reinjected with Adr (0.8 mg/kg) subcutaneously 2 h after the ice-bath to obtain blood stasis model. Rats were fasted overnight and administration continued after performing the model. Blood samples were collected 30 min after the last administration on the following day [8].Compounds’ experiment was similar to the above method. Group 1 and Group 2 were the same as the above. Group 3 was model + xiangdan injection (Xdi) (3.6 mL/Kg), Groups 4–7 were model + drugs, and rats were given 5 mg/kg compounds. All treatments were performed by caudal vein and administered seven times with an interval of 24 h.After the sixth administration, the model rats with blood stasis were established by the above method.


### 2.7. Collection of Blood Sample

Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (300 mg/kg) 18 h after the last injection of Adr, and blood was drawn from the abdominal aortas. Blood was collected using 8# disposable vein infusion needles. 1 mL of blood was taken into centrifuge tube on standing position until the serum was fully precipitated. The serum was used to determine eNOS, ET-1, 6-Keto-PGF1α, and TXB2. Another part of the blood was collected into vacuum tube containing heparin to detect WBV, PV, PT, TT, APTT, FIB, ESR, and PCV, respectively.


### 2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS19.0 software. Comparison between any two groups was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All graphics were drawn by GraphPad Prism 5.


## 2.1. Plant Materials

The RPR was purchased from Lerentang Pharmacy, Kaifeng, Henan Province, China, and a voucher specimen was identified by Professor Chang-qin Li of Henan University and deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Natural Products, Henan University.


## 2.2. Animals

Male and female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, weighing from 220 to 300 g, and male New Zealand white rabbits from 2.0 to 2.5 kg were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Henan Province (Zhengzhou, Henan, China) (12 h light/dark cycle, 25°C, and humidity 45 to 65%) and were fed with standard rodent diet and water ad libitum. The animal procedures were approved by the ethical committee in accordance with “Institute Ethical Committee Guidelines” for Animal Experimentation and Care. Animals were housed in standard cage.


## 2.3. Chemicals

The following was used: PT, APTT, TT, and FIB Assay Kits (Shanghai Sun Biotech Co., Ltd.); Bovine Fibrinogen (Sigma, USA); Thrombin (Sigma, USA,); Urokinase (Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Macao, and Asia); Agarose (GENE Company); Complex Tablet (Hutchison Whampoa Guangzhou Baiyunshan Chinese Medicine Company Limited, China); Rat Endothelin 1 (ET-1) Elisa Kit; Rat Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Elisa Kit; Rat 6-Keto-PGF1α Elisa Kit; Rat Thromboxane B2 (TXB2) Elisa Kit (Nanjing Sengbiejia Biotech Co., Ltd.).


## 2.4. Extraction and Isolation

Air-dried and powdered roots of RPR (1.9 kg) were extracted with 70% ethanol at 60°C for two times (2 h each time) and then pressure was reduced to yield a viscous gummy material (570 g). The total extract was dissolved in 500 mL of water and then extracted with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, andn-butanol. The PE, EtOAc, and BuOH extracts were concentrated under reduced pressure to give 6 g, 29 g, and 81.3 g, respectively. EtOAc extract (29 g) was subjected to silica gel H column chromatography and eluted with dichloromethane-ethyl acetate (100 : 0-0 : 100, v/v) to yield three fractions. The first fraction (4.6 g) was further separated on a silica gel column repeatedly to yield compound1 (123.1 mg). The second fraction (2.3 g) was purified by various column chromatography including silica gel and sephadex LH-20 to yield compound2 (53.5 mg) and compound3 (36.5 mg).n-Butanol extract (81.3 g) was purified on MPLC and then further separated on silica gel H and sephadex LH-20 column chromatography to get compounds4 (31.2 mg),5 (82.9 mg), and6 (38.4 mg), respectively. The six compounds were identified as paeoniflorin (1, Pae), pentagalloylglucose (2, Pen), benzoyl paeoniflorin (3, Ben), oxypaeoniflora (4, Oxy), albiflorin (5, Ali), and protocatechuic acid (6, Pro) by 1H NMR and 13C NMR. All the compounds were performed on HPLC, and the purity was over 98%.


## 2.5. Coagulation Time Test In Vitro

Blood samples were drawn from rabbit’s auricular vein. After collection, the blood was decalcified by sodium citrate to prevent blood clotting, and then serums were separated from the plasma by centrifugation of 3,000 rpm at 5°C for 15 min [10]. APTT and PT were determined according to the literature [11]. In brief, serum (50 μL) was mixed with 25 μL of samples, next APTT assay reagent (50 μL) was added and incubated for 5 min at 37°C, and then 25 mM CaCl2 (100 μL) was added. Clotting times were recorded. Meanwhile, in PT assays, serums (50 μL) mixed with 25 μL of samples were incubated for 3 min at 37°C. PT assay reagent (50 μL), which has been hatched for 10 min at 37°C, was then added and clotting time was recorded. Determination of TT and FIB was performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Shanghai Sun Biotech Co., Ltd., China). In the above tests, control solvent was used as control group, and breviscapine and vitamin K1 were used as positive control group. PT, APTT, TT, and FIB assays were conducted by Semiautomated Coagulation Analyzer.


## 2.6. Experimental Model and Drug Administration

Rats were randomly divided into seven groups with eight animals in each, whose gender was equally distributed throughout groups. Group 1 was the control and Group 2 was the model, and rats were given control solvent. Group 3 was model + aspirin (ASP), and rats were given 100 mg/kg ASP. Groups 4–7 were model + drugs, and rats were given 1.2 g/kg RPR extract. All treatments were performed by gavage and were administered seven times with an interval of 12 h.After the fifth administration, model rats groups were placed in ice-cold water during the interval between two injections of adrenaline hydrochloride (Adr) to establish blood stasis model. All other rats were subcutaneously injected with Adr (0.8 mg/kg), except for the control rats, which were injected with 0.9% (w/v) NaCl saline solution. After 2 h, the rats were kept in ice-cold water (0–2°C) for 5 min and then reinjected with Adr (0.8 mg/kg) subcutaneously 2 h after the ice-bath to obtain blood stasis model. Rats were fasted overnight and administration continued after performing the model. Blood samples were collected 30 min after the last administration on the following day [8].Compounds’ experiment was similar to the above method. Group 1 and Group 2 were the same as the above. Group 3 was model + xiangdan injection (Xdi) (3.6 mL/Kg), Groups 4–7 were model + drugs, and rats were given 5 mg/kg compounds. All treatments were performed by caudal vein and administered seven times with an interval of 24 h.After the sixth administration, the model rats with blood stasis were established by the above method.


## 2.7. Collection of Blood Sample

Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (300 mg/kg) 18 h after the last injection of Adr, and blood was drawn from the abdominal aortas. Blood was collected using 8# disposable vein infusion needles. 1 mL of blood was taken into centrifuge tube on standing position until the serum was fully precipitated. The serum was used to determine eNOS, ET-1, 6-Keto-PGF1α, and TXB2. Another part of the blood was collected into vacuum tube containing heparin to detect WBV, PV, PT, TT, APTT, FIB, ESR, and PCV, respectively.


## 2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experimental results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS19.0 software. Comparison between any two groups was evaluated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All graphics were drawn by GraphPad Prism 5.


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters In Vitro

As shown in Figure1, compared with the control group, ethanol extract of RPR (Ret), petroleum extract of RPR (Rpe), ethyl acetate extract of RPR (Rea),n-butyl alcohol extract of RPR (Rbu), Pae, Ali, Pen, Oxy, and Pro could significantly prolong APTT (0.01<p<0.05; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001, respectively). Above all, there was no difference between Rbu and breviscapine (Brv) (p>0.05). In PT assay, compared with the control group, all of the extracts and six compounds could significantly prolong PT (0.01<p<0.05; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001, respectively). Then the prolonging PT effects of Rpe, Rea, and Rbu were better than that of Brv (0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001; resp.) and Ret, Pae, Pen, Oxy, Ben, and Pro had no difference with the Brv (p>0.05). In TT assay, compared with the control group, the Ret, Rpe, Rea, Rbu, Pae, Ali, Pen, and Pro could significantly prolong TT (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05, resp.). For FIB assay, the Rpe, Pae, Ali, Pen, Oxy, and Ben could significantly decrease the content of FIB (p<0.001), while the Ret, Rea, Rbu, and Pro could significantly increase the content of FIB (p<0.001).Figure 1
Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract and six compounds in vitro (n=4; p∗∗∗<0.001 or 0.001<p∗∗<0.01 or p∗<0.05 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 or p#<0.05 versus breviscapine).


### 3.2. The Antithrombotic Effect of RPR Extract In Vivo

#### 3.2.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV In Vivo

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table1. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001) and they decreased WBV and PV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 1
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/s Con 4.34 ± 0.20 5.45 ± 0.33 9.88 ± 0.61 1.23 ± 0.03 Mod 5.44 ± 0.17 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.80 ± 0.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.66 ± 0.25 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.42 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 4.67 ± 0.47 # # # 5.75 ± 0.19 # # # 9.98 ± 0.36 # # # 1.27 ± 0.03 # # # Ret 4.68 ± 0.17 # # # 6.04 ± 0.45 # # 10.39 ± 0.68 # # # 1.29±0.01### Rea 4.67 ± 0.46 # # # 5.80 ± 0.56 # # # 10.17 ± 0.41 # # # 1.29 ± 0.05 # # # Rbu 4.64 ± 0.43 # # # 5.60 ± 0.61 # # # 10.38 ± 0.54 # # # 1.26 ± 0.04 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 and 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group.The results of ESR and PCV were shown in Table2. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001), which indicated that the blood stasis model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001), and they decreased ESR effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05). The Rea and Rbu decreased PCV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 2
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose (g/kg) ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.08 37.15 ± 2.46 Mod — 11.60 ± 1.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 46.83 ± 0.71 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 7.40 ± 0.55 # # # 38.92 ± 1.04 # # # Ret 1.2 6.79 ± 0.84 # # # 41.71 ± 1.30 # # # △ Rea 1.2 7.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 2.33 # # # Rbu 1.2 6.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 1.82 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 versus model group, and p△<0.05 versus aspirin.


#### 3.2.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

To evaluate the effect of the coagulation cascade on the antithrombotic activity of RPR extract, the classical coagulation assays (APTT, TT, PT, and FIB content) were determined in vivo. Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure2. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). RPR extracts could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content significantly (p<0.001).Figure 2
Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin; p#<0.05 versus model group).


#### 3.2.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α Assay in Serum

Results of TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α were shown in Table 3, and the plasma TXB2 level in model rats was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model rats was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and the effects of Ret and Rea were close to aspirin (p>0.05). Ret and Rbu could significantly upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05), and there were no obvious differences with aspirin (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Ret, Rea, and Rbu decreased the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). The ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in Ret was lower than that of aspirin (p<0.001) and that of Rea was close to those of aspirin (p>0.05).Table 3
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose (g/kg) 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 91.79 ± 7.38 83.36 ± 6.75 0.911 ± 0.08 Mod — 81.26 ± 2.05 ∗ 108.78 ± 3.79 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.34 ± 0.06 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 90.58 ± 4.56 # 81.90 ± 4.38 # # # 0.910 ± 0.07 # # # Ret 1.2 96.27 ± 8.13 # # # 83.52 ± 3.74 # # # 0.874 ± 0.10 # # # △ △ △ Rea 1.2 86.81 ± 6.10 84.42 ± 7.96 # # # 0.976 ± 0.11 # # # Rbu 1.2 91.24 ± 5.36 # 99.24 ± 6.93 # # △ △ △ 1.09 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 or p∗<0.05 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.01<p##<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin.


#### 3.2.4. Effect of RPR on ET and eNOS

In Figure3, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (65.90 ± 4.24 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (46.75 ± 2.54 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (18.96 ± 1.27 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (22.61 ± 0.73 U/L) (p<0.001). Ret and Rea could effectively downregulate of ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.), and Rea downregulation of ET-1 level effect was better than that of aspirin (p<0.001), and the effect of Ret downregulation of ET-1 level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin group (p>0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.) and the effects of Rbu upregulation of eNOS level were better than that of aspirin (p<0.05), the effects of Rea upregulation of eNOS level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin (p>0.05).Figure 3
The effects of RPR treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus aspirin; p#<0.05).


### 3.3. The Antithrombotic Effect of Active Compounds In Vivo

#### 3.3.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table4. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and they decreased WBV effects as well as xiangdan injection (Xdi) (p>0.05) at low shear rate.Table 4
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group Dose WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/S Con — 3.96 ± 0.11 5.26 ± 0.09 10.06 ± 0.21 1.27 ± 0.04 Mod — 5.29 ± 0.18 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.60 ± 0.23 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.55 ± 0.43 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.41 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 4.14 ± 0.04 # # # 5.28 ± 0.19 # # # 10.49 ± 0.86 # # # 1.27 ± 0.01 # # # Pro 5.0 mg/Kg 4.77 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ 5.82 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 11.10 ± 0.18 # # # 1.36 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Ali 5.0 mg/Kg 4.37 ± 0.17 # # # △ △ 5.39 ± 0.26 # # # 10.27 ± 0.47 # # # 1.33 ± 0.03 # # # △ Pae 5.0 mg/Kg 4.46 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 5.58 ± 0.12 # # # △ △ 10.62 ± 0.23 # # # 1.35 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Pen 5.0 mg/Kg 4.63 ± 0.05 # # # △ △ △ 5.69 ± 0.99 # # # △ △ 10.70 ± 0.39 # # # 1.34 ± 0.02 # # △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001, 0.001<p##<0.01, and p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001, 0.001<p△△<0.01, and p△<0.05 versus Xdi.The results of ESR and PCV for each group are shown in Table5. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05). Effects on ESR and PCV of Ali were equal to Xdi (p>0.05). Effect on ESR of Pro was equal to Xdi (p>0.05). The effect on PCV of Pae was equal to Xdi (p>0.05).Table 5
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.82 36.04 ± 1.23 Mod — 10.50 ± 0.58 ∗ ∗ ∗ 45.80 ± 1.30 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 7.25 ± 0.50 # # # 37.11 ± 1.73 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 8.50 ± 0.58 # # 40.73 ± 1.16 # # # △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 8.5 ± 1.29 # # 37.56 ± 2.37 # # # Pae 5 mg/Kg 8.75 ± 1.7 # △ 38.68 ± 1.48 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 8.90 ± 0.84 # △ 39.55 ± 1.48 # # # △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, and p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 or p#<0.05 versus model group, and 0.001<p△△<0.01 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi.


#### 3.3.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure4. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased very significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content effectively (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 4
Anticoagulation activity of active compounds in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p△△<0.01).


#### 3.3.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto- PGF1α in Serum

In Table6, the plasma TXB2 level in blood stasis model was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model group was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.001).Table 6
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 1.358 ± 0.11 100.74 ± 2.58 1.358 ± 0.11 Mod — 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ 109.63 ± 1.00 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 1.178 ± . 015 # # # 100.24 ± 3.16 # # # 1.178 ± . 015 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ 106.25 ± 3.58 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ 100.36 ± 1.05 # # # 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ Pae 5 mg/Kg 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # 106.42 ± 2.32 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # 101.23 ± 2.35 # # # 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or 0.01<p△△<0.001 versus Xdi.Ali and Pen could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and they were close to those of Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could effectively upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and Pae and Pen had no obvious difference compared to Xdi (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could decrease the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). Pro and Ali ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in the rat were lower compared to the Xdi (p<0.001) and those of the Pae and Pen were close to those of Xdi (p>0.05).


#### 3.3.4. Effect of Compounds on ET and eNOS

As shown in Figure5, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (94.82 ± 4.19 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (87.08 ± 3.34 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (22.83 ± 1.45 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (26.77 ± 0.98 U/L) (p<0.001). Ali and Pae could effectively downregulate ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and the Pae group downregulation of ET-1 level effect had no obvious difference compared to Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and Ali and Pen upregulation of eNOS level effect was better than aspirin group (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 5
The effects of active compounds treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p∗∗<0.01 versus control group).


## 3.1. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters In Vitro

As shown in Figure1, compared with the control group, ethanol extract of RPR (Ret), petroleum extract of RPR (Rpe), ethyl acetate extract of RPR (Rea),n-butyl alcohol extract of RPR (Rbu), Pae, Ali, Pen, Oxy, and Pro could significantly prolong APTT (0.01<p<0.05; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001, respectively). Above all, there was no difference between Rbu and breviscapine (Brv) (p>0.05). In PT assay, compared with the control group, all of the extracts and six compounds could significantly prolong PT (0.01<p<0.05; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001, respectively). Then the prolonging PT effects of Rpe, Rea, and Rbu were better than that of Brv (0.001<p<0.01; p<0.001; resp.) and Ret, Pae, Pen, Oxy, Ben, and Pro had no difference with the Brv (p>0.05). In TT assay, compared with the control group, the Ret, Rpe, Rea, Rbu, Pae, Ali, Pen, and Pro could significantly prolong TT (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05, resp.). For FIB assay, the Rpe, Pae, Ali, Pen, Oxy, and Ben could significantly decrease the content of FIB (p<0.001), while the Ret, Rea, Rbu, and Pro could significantly increase the content of FIB (p<0.001).Figure 1
Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract and six compounds in vitro (n=4; p∗∗∗<0.001 or 0.001<p∗∗<0.01 or p∗<0.05 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 or p#<0.05 versus breviscapine).


## 3.2. The Antithrombotic Effect of RPR Extract In Vivo

### 3.2.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV In Vivo

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table1. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001) and they decreased WBV and PV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 1
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/s Con 4.34 ± 0.20 5.45 ± 0.33 9.88 ± 0.61 1.23 ± 0.03 Mod 5.44 ± 0.17 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.80 ± 0.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.66 ± 0.25 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.42 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 4.67 ± 0.47 # # # 5.75 ± 0.19 # # # 9.98 ± 0.36 # # # 1.27 ± 0.03 # # # Ret 4.68 ± 0.17 # # # 6.04 ± 0.45 # # 10.39 ± 0.68 # # # 1.29±0.01### Rea 4.67 ± 0.46 # # # 5.80 ± 0.56 # # # 10.17 ± 0.41 # # # 1.29 ± 0.05 # # # Rbu 4.64 ± 0.43 # # # 5.60 ± 0.61 # # # 10.38 ± 0.54 # # # 1.26 ± 0.04 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 and 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group.The results of ESR and PCV were shown in Table2. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001), which indicated that the blood stasis model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001), and they decreased ESR effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05). The Rea and Rbu decreased PCV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 2
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose (g/kg) ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.08 37.15 ± 2.46 Mod — 11.60 ± 1.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 46.83 ± 0.71 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 7.40 ± 0.55 # # # 38.92 ± 1.04 # # # Ret 1.2 6.79 ± 0.84 # # # 41.71 ± 1.30 # # # △ Rea 1.2 7.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 2.33 # # # Rbu 1.2 6.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 1.82 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 versus model group, and p△<0.05 versus aspirin.


### 3.2.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

To evaluate the effect of the coagulation cascade on the antithrombotic activity of RPR extract, the classical coagulation assays (APTT, TT, PT, and FIB content) were determined in vivo. Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure2. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). RPR extracts could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content significantly (p<0.001).Figure 2
Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin; p#<0.05 versus model group).


### 3.2.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α Assay in Serum

Results of TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α were shown in Table 3, and the plasma TXB2 level in model rats was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model rats was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and the effects of Ret and Rea were close to aspirin (p>0.05). Ret and Rbu could significantly upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05), and there were no obvious differences with aspirin (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Ret, Rea, and Rbu decreased the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). The ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in Ret was lower than that of aspirin (p<0.001) and that of Rea was close to those of aspirin (p>0.05).Table 3
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose (g/kg) 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 91.79 ± 7.38 83.36 ± 6.75 0.911 ± 0.08 Mod — 81.26 ± 2.05 ∗ 108.78 ± 3.79 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.34 ± 0.06 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 90.58 ± 4.56 # 81.90 ± 4.38 # # # 0.910 ± 0.07 # # # Ret 1.2 96.27 ± 8.13 # # # 83.52 ± 3.74 # # # 0.874 ± 0.10 # # # △ △ △ Rea 1.2 86.81 ± 6.10 84.42 ± 7.96 # # # 0.976 ± 0.11 # # # Rbu 1.2 91.24 ± 5.36 # 99.24 ± 6.93 # # △ △ △ 1.09 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 or p∗<0.05 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.01<p##<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin.


### 3.2.4. Effect of RPR on ET and eNOS

In Figure3, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (65.90 ± 4.24 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (46.75 ± 2.54 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (18.96 ± 1.27 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (22.61 ± 0.73 U/L) (p<0.001). Ret and Rea could effectively downregulate of ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.), and Rea downregulation of ET-1 level effect was better than that of aspirin (p<0.001), and the effect of Ret downregulation of ET-1 level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin group (p>0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.) and the effects of Rbu upregulation of eNOS level were better than that of aspirin (p<0.05), the effects of Rea upregulation of eNOS level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin (p>0.05).Figure 3
The effects of RPR treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus aspirin; p#<0.05).


## 3.2.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV In Vivo

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table1. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001) and they decreased WBV and PV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 1
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/s Con 4.34 ± 0.20 5.45 ± 0.33 9.88 ± 0.61 1.23 ± 0.03 Mod 5.44 ± 0.17 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.80 ± 0.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.66 ± 0.25 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.42 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 4.67 ± 0.47 # # # 5.75 ± 0.19 # # # 9.98 ± 0.36 # # # 1.27 ± 0.03 # # # Ret 4.68 ± 0.17 # # # 6.04 ± 0.45 # # 10.39 ± 0.68 # # # 1.29±0.01### Rea 4.67 ± 0.46 # # # 5.80 ± 0.56 # # # 10.17 ± 0.41 # # # 1.29 ± 0.05 # # # Rbu 4.64 ± 0.43 # # # 5.60 ± 0.61 # # # 10.38 ± 0.54 # # # 1.26 ± 0.04 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 and 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group.The results of ESR and PCV were shown in Table2. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001), which indicated that the blood stasis model was successfully established. The Ret, Rea, and Rbu groups could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001), and they decreased ESR effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05). The Rea and Rbu decreased PCV effects as well as aspirin group (p>0.05).Table 2
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose (g/kg) ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.08 37.15 ± 2.46 Mod — 11.60 ± 1.14 ∗ ∗ ∗ 46.83 ± 0.71 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 7.40 ± 0.55 # # # 38.92 ± 1.04 # # # Ret 1.2 6.79 ± 0.84 # # # 41.71 ± 1.30 # # # △ Rea 1.2 7.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 2.33 # # # Rbu 1.2 6.80 ± 0.84 # # # 39.73 ± 1.82 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, p###<0.001 versus model group, and p△<0.05 versus aspirin.


## 3.2.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

To evaluate the effect of the coagulation cascade on the antithrombotic activity of RPR extract, the classical coagulation assays (APTT, TT, PT, and FIB content) were determined in vivo. Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure2. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). RPR extracts could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content significantly (p<0.001).Figure 2
Anticoagulation activity of RPR extract in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin; p#<0.05 versus model group).


## 3.2.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α Assay in Serum

Results of TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α were shown in Table 3, and the plasma TXB2 level in model rats was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model rats was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and the effects of Ret and Rea were close to aspirin (p>0.05). Ret and Rbu could significantly upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05), and there were no obvious differences with aspirin (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Ret, Rea, and Rbu decreased the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). The ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in Ret was lower than that of aspirin (p<0.001) and that of Rea was close to those of aspirin (p>0.05).Table 3
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose (g/kg) 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 91.79 ± 7.38 83.36 ± 6.75 0.911 ± 0.08 Mod — 81.26 ± 2.05 ∗ 108.78 ± 3.79 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.34 ± 0.06 ∗ ∗ ∗ Asp 0.1 90.58 ± 4.56 # 81.90 ± 4.38 # # # 0.910 ± 0.07 # # # Ret 1.2 96.27 ± 8.13 # # # 83.52 ± 3.74 # # # 0.874 ± 0.10 # # # △ △ △ Rea 1.2 86.81 ± 6.10 84.42 ± 7.96 # # # 0.976 ± 0.11 # # # Rbu 1.2 91.24 ± 5.36 # 99.24 ± 6.93 # # △ △ △ 1.09 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 or p∗<0.05 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.01<p##<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 versus aspirin.


## 3.2.4. Effect of RPR on ET and eNOS

In Figure3, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (65.90 ± 4.24 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (46.75 ± 2.54 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (18.96 ± 1.27 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (22.61 ± 0.73 U/L) (p<0.001). Ret and Rea could effectively downregulate of ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.), and Rea downregulation of ET-1 level effect was better than that of aspirin (p<0.001), and the effect of Ret downregulation of ET-1 level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin group (p>0.05). Ret, Rea, and Rbu could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, p<0.05, resp.) and the effects of Rbu upregulation of eNOS level were better than that of aspirin (p<0.05), the effects of Rea upregulation of eNOS level had no obvious difference compared to aspirin (p>0.05).Figure 3
The effects of RPR treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus aspirin; p#<0.05).


## 3.3. The Antithrombotic Effect of Active Compounds In Vivo

### 3.3.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table4. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and they decreased WBV effects as well as xiangdan injection (Xdi) (p>0.05) at low shear rate.Table 4
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group Dose WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/S Con — 3.96 ± 0.11 5.26 ± 0.09 10.06 ± 0.21 1.27 ± 0.04 Mod — 5.29 ± 0.18 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.60 ± 0.23 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.55 ± 0.43 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.41 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 4.14 ± 0.04 # # # 5.28 ± 0.19 # # # 10.49 ± 0.86 # # # 1.27 ± 0.01 # # # Pro 5.0 mg/Kg 4.77 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ 5.82 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 11.10 ± 0.18 # # # 1.36 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Ali 5.0 mg/Kg 4.37 ± 0.17 # # # △ △ 5.39 ± 0.26 # # # 10.27 ± 0.47 # # # 1.33 ± 0.03 # # # △ Pae 5.0 mg/Kg 4.46 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 5.58 ± 0.12 # # # △ △ 10.62 ± 0.23 # # # 1.35 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Pen 5.0 mg/Kg 4.63 ± 0.05 # # # △ △ △ 5.69 ± 0.99 # # # △ △ 10.70 ± 0.39 # # # 1.34 ± 0.02 # # △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001, 0.001<p##<0.01, and p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001, 0.001<p△△<0.01, and p△<0.05 versus Xdi.The results of ESR and PCV for each group are shown in Table5. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05). Effects on ESR and PCV of Ali were equal to Xdi (p>0.05). Effect on ESR of Pro was equal to Xdi (p>0.05). The effect on PCV of Pae was equal to Xdi (p>0.05).Table 5
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.82 36.04 ± 1.23 Mod — 10.50 ± 0.58 ∗ ∗ ∗ 45.80 ± 1.30 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 7.25 ± 0.50 # # # 37.11 ± 1.73 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 8.50 ± 0.58 # # 40.73 ± 1.16 # # # △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 8.5 ± 1.29 # # 37.56 ± 2.37 # # # Pae 5 mg/Kg 8.75 ± 1.7 # △ 38.68 ± 1.48 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 8.90 ± 0.84 # △ 39.55 ± 1.48 # # # △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, and p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 or p#<0.05 versus model group, and 0.001<p△△<0.01 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi.


### 3.3.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure4. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased very significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content effectively (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 4
Anticoagulation activity of active compounds in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p△△<0.01).


### 3.3.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto- PGF1α in Serum

In Table6, the plasma TXB2 level in blood stasis model was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model group was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.001).Table 6
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 1.358 ± 0.11 100.74 ± 2.58 1.358 ± 0.11 Mod — 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ 109.63 ± 1.00 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 1.178 ± . 015 # # # 100.24 ± 3.16 # # # 1.178 ± . 015 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ 106.25 ± 3.58 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ 100.36 ± 1.05 # # # 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ Pae 5 mg/Kg 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # 106.42 ± 2.32 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # 101.23 ± 2.35 # # # 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or 0.01<p△△<0.001 versus Xdi.Ali and Pen could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and they were close to those of Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could effectively upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and Pae and Pen had no obvious difference compared to Xdi (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could decrease the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). Pro and Ali ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in the rat were lower compared to the Xdi (p<0.001) and those of the Pae and Pen were close to those of Xdi (p>0.05).


### 3.3.4. Effect of Compounds on ET and eNOS

As shown in Figure5, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (94.82 ± 4.19 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (87.08 ± 3.34 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (22.83 ± 1.45 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (26.77 ± 0.98 U/L) (p<0.001). Ali and Pae could effectively downregulate ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and the Pae group downregulation of ET-1 level effect had no obvious difference compared to Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and Ali and Pen upregulation of eNOS level effect was better than aspirin group (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 5
The effects of active compounds treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p∗∗<0.01 versus control group).


## 3.3.1. Effects on WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV

The effects on WBV and PV were shown in Table4. In model group, WBV and PV significantly increased at all shear rates in the blood stasis (p<0.001), which indicated the blood stasis rat model was successfully established. Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease WBV and PV at all shear rates (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and they decreased WBV effects as well as xiangdan injection (Xdi) (p>0.05) at low shear rate.Table 4
Effect on WBV (mPa⋅s) at various shear rates.
Group Dose WBV (mPa⋅s) PV (mPa⋅s) 200/S 30/S 3/S 30/S Con — 3.96 ± 0.11 5.26 ± 0.09 10.06 ± 0.21 1.27 ± 0.04 Mod — 5.29 ± 0.18 ∗ ∗ ∗ 6.60 ± 0.23 ∗ ∗ ∗ 12.55 ± 0.43 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.41 ± 0.03 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 4.14 ± 0.04 # # # 5.28 ± 0.19 # # # 10.49 ± 0.86 # # # 1.27 ± 0.01 # # # Pro 5.0 mg/Kg 4.77 ± 0.09 # # # △ △ △ 5.82 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 11.10 ± 0.18 # # # 1.36 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Ali 5.0 mg/Kg 4.37 ± 0.17 # # # △ △ 5.39 ± 0.26 # # # 10.27 ± 0.47 # # # 1.33 ± 0.03 # # # △ Pae 5.0 mg/Kg 4.46 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ △ 5.58 ± 0.12 # # # △ △ 10.62 ± 0.23 # # # 1.35 ± 0.03 # △ △ △ Pen 5.0 mg/Kg 4.63 ± 0.05 # # # △ △ △ 5.69 ± 0.99 # # # △ △ 10.70 ± 0.39 # # # 1.34 ± 0.02 # # △ △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001, 0.001<p##<0.01, and p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001, 0.001<p△△<0.01, and p△<0.05 versus Xdi.The results of ESR and PCV for each group are shown in Table5. ESR and PCV in the model group were higher than that of control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could significantly decrease ESR and PCV (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05). Effects on ESR and PCV of Ali were equal to Xdi (p>0.05). Effect on ESR of Pro was equal to Xdi (p>0.05). The effect on PCV of Pae was equal to Xdi (p>0.05).Table 5
Effect on ESR and PCV.
Group Dose ESR (mm⋅h−1) PCV (%) Con — 3.00 ± 0.82 36.04 ± 1.23 Mod — 10.50 ± 0.58 ∗ ∗ ∗ 45.80 ± 1.30 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 7.25 ± 0.50 # # # 37.11 ± 1.73 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 8.50 ± 0.58 # # 40.73 ± 1.16 # # # △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 8.5 ± 1.29 # # 37.56 ± 2.37 # # # Pae 5 mg/Kg 8.75 ± 1.7 # △ 38.68 ± 1.48 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 8.90 ± 0.84 # △ 39.55 ± 1.48 # # # △ Data represent mean ± SD.n=8, p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group, and p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 or p#<0.05 versus model group, and 0.001<p△△<0.01 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi.


## 3.3.2. Effects on Plasma Coagulation Parameters

Coagulation parameters were shown in Figure4. APTT, TT, and PT were decreased, and FIB content was increased very significantly in model group compared with control group (p<0.001). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could prolong PT, APTT, and TT and decrease FIB content effectively (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 4
Anticoagulation activity of active compounds in vivo (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or p#<0.05 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p△△<0.01).


## 3.3.3. TXB2 and 6-Keto- PGF1α in Serum

In Table6, the plasma TXB2 level in blood stasis model was prominently higher than that of control group (p<0.001), whereas the plasma 6-Keto-PGF1α level in model group was markedly lower than that of control group (p<0.001).Table 6
Effect on TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α in serum.
Group Dose 6-Keto-PGF1α (ng/L) TXB2 TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α Con — 1.358 ± 0.11 100.74 ± 2.58 1.358 ± 0.11 Mod — 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ 109.63 ± 1.00 ∗ ∗ ∗ 1.872 ± 0.10 ∗ ∗ ∗ Xdi 3.6 mL/Kg 1.178 ± . 015 # # # 100.24 ± 3.16 # # # 1.178 ± . 015 # # # Pro 5 mg/Kg 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ 106.25 ± 3.58 1.479 ± 0.04 # # # △ △ △ Ali 5 mg/Kg 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ 100.36 ± 1.05 # # # 1.406 ± 0.11 # # # △ △ Pae 5 mg/Kg 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # 106.42 ± 2.32 1.208 ± 0.08 # # # Pen 5 mg/Kg 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # 101.23 ± 2.35 # # # 1.198 ± 0.07 # # # Data represent mean ± SD.n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or 0.01<p△△<0.001 versus Xdi.Ali and Pen could significantly counteract increase of TXB2 level (p<0.001) and they were close to those of Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could effectively upregulate 6-Keto-PGF1α level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and Pae and Pen had no obvious difference compared to Xdi (p>0.05). Meanwhile, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could decrease the ratio of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α compared with model group (p<0.001). Pro and Ali ratios of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α in the rat were lower compared to the Xdi (p<0.001) and those of the Pae and Pen were close to those of Xdi (p>0.05).


## 3.3.4. Effect of Compounds on ET and eNOS

As shown in Figure5, the plasma ET-1 level in blood stasis model rats (94.82 ± 4.19 μg/L) was prominently higher than that of control group (87.08 ± 3.34 μg/L) (p<0.001), whereas the plasma eNOS level in model rats (22.83 ± 1.45 U/L) was markedly lower than that of control group (26.77 ± 0.98 U/L) (p<0.001). Ali and Pae could effectively downregulate ET-1 level and upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001, 0.001<p<0.01), and the Pae group downregulation of ET-1 level effect had no obvious difference compared to Xdi group (p>0.05). Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen could upregulate eNOS level in plasma compared with model rats (p<0.001; 0.001<p<0.01; p<0.05) and Ali and Pen upregulation of eNOS level effect was better than aspirin group (p<0.001, p<0.05).Figure 5
The effects of active compounds treatment on eNOS and ET-1 level in thrombosis rats (n=8; p∗∗∗<0.001 versus control group; p###<0.001 or 0.001<p##<0.01 versus model group; p△△△<0.001 or p△<0.05 versus Xdi; 0.001<p∗∗<0.01 versus control group).


## 4. Discussion

APTT, PT, TT, and FIB are four indicators, related to anticoagulant in clinical practice. In our study, Rpe, Pae, Ali, and Pen could significantly extend TT, APTT, and TT and reduced the content of FIB in vitro, which indicated the beneficial effect of them on intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways, and hinder fibrin formation. Ret, Rea, Rbu, and Pro could significantly extend TT, APTT, and PT, but they could not reduce the content of FIB in vitro, which indicated the beneficial effect of them on intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways. Then the Oxy and Ben had no anticoagulation effect in vitro.Hemorheology is related to blood flow and pressure, flow volume, and resistance of blood vessels, including WBV, PV, ESR, and PCV. Hemorheology is commonly used for diagnosis and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in clinical practice [12–19]. Red blood cells (RBCs), platelets, and plasma have an influence on WBV, because RBCs account for almost 50% of blood volume and constitute the majority of the cellular content in blood. In our research, Ret, Rea, Rbu, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen groups could significantly decrease WBV and PCV which suggested that the amelioration effect of compounds on WBV might be partly due to the PCV decrease.PV plays an important role in WBV. It showed the coefficient between PV and ESR was positive in significant level [20]. In our research, Ret, Rea, Rbu, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen groups could significantly decrease PV and ESR which suggested that the amelioration effect of compounds on PV might be partly due to the ESR decrease.Ret, Rea, Rbu, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen groups could significantly extend TT, APTT, and PT and reduced the content of FIB in vivo, which indicated the beneficial effect of them on intrinsic and extrinsic coagulation pathways, and hinder fibrin formation. However, further study will be required to clarify these additional mechanisms.TXA2 and PGI2, metabolites of arachidonic acid (AA), which are mutually antagonistic, play an important role in thrombosis. TXB2 and 6-Keto-PGF1α are the stable metabolites of TXA2 and PGI2, respectively [21]. The dynamic equilibrium of TXB2/6-Keto-PGF1α is a vital factor for the regulation and control of vessel wall intensity and regional flow [21, 22].Our study results suggested that Ret, Rbu, Ali, and Pen could significantly downregulate serum TXB2 level and upregulate serum 6-Keto-PGF1α level in blood stasis rat, which indicated that the antithrombotic effects of them were associated with the regulation of TXA2 and PGI2. Rea could significantly downregulate serum TXB2 level, which indicated that the antithrombotic effect of Rea was associated with the regulation of TXA2. Pro and Pen could significantly upregulate serum 6-Keto-PGF1α level, indicating that the antithrombotic action of Pro and Pen was associated with the regulation of PGI2.Endothelial dysfunction plays a pivotal role in thrombosis [23, 24]. ET and NO, a pair of mutually antagonistic biological activity factor, play an important role in regulating cardiovascular system function and participate in a variety of pathological processes of cardiovascular disease. The damage of vascular endothelial cells increases the release of ET and leads to vasoconstriction [25]. NO synthase can reflect the changes in endogenous NO, a vasodilatory factor secreted by endothelial cells. ENOS, a constitutively present enzyme in distinct subcellular locations within cardiomyocytes, is mainly responsible for the endothelium-dependent vasodilatation distributed in vascular endothelium. And the activation of eNOS promotes the continued release of NO [26, 27]. A research [28] reported that RPR could relaxe vascular smooth muscle via endothelium-dependent and Akt- and SOCE-eNOS-cGMP-mediated pathways through activation of both KCa and KATP channels and inhibition of L-type Ca2+ channels. In our research, Rbu, Pro, and Pen could significantly increase eNOS level. Then Ret, Rea, Ali, and Pae could significantly decrease ET level and markedly increase eNOS level. These results indicated that Ret, Rea, Ali, and Pae had a protective effect on vascular endothelium and could regulate the tension of vascular smooth muscle by downregulating ET level and upregulating eNOS level.In addition, Wang et al. [29] investigated water extract of RPR against myocardial ischemia in mice induced by isoproterenol and found that RPR has the cardioprotective activities on isoproterenol-induced myocardial ischemia. Myocardial ischemia is associated with myocardial infarction and sudden death; hence, antithrombotic effects of RPR may contribute to the improvement of myocardial ischemia. The research [30] reported that Pae has many pharmacological activities, such as protection function of the blood brain barrier, cerebral blood flow, brain edema after cerebral ischemia, antitumour effect, immune regulation, and hypoglycemic effect. Another research [31] showed that Pae and Ali could increase the numbers of white blood cells and reversed the atrophy of thymus. However cardiovascular research on Pen and Pro was little. In our study, Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen were four antithrombotic components of RPR.


## 5. Conclusion

The present study suggested that the RPR extract and the Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen possessed remarkable antithrombotic property in blood stasis model rats induced by ice water bath and subcutaneous injection of norepinephrine. This property could be associated with activating blood flow, anticoagulation activity, the regulation of active substances in vascular endothelium, and maintaining the balance of TXA2 and PGI2. In the end, the Pro, Ali, Pae, and Pen may be the main antithrombotic ingredient of RPR.



---

*Source: 9475074-2017-02-16.xml*