# A Voltammetric Sensor Based on NiO Nanoparticle-Modified Carbon-Paste Electrode for Determination of Cysteamine in the Presence of High Concentration of Tryptophan

Authors: Hassan Karimi-Maleh; Maryam Salimi-Amiri; Fatemeh Karimi; Mohammad A. Khalilzadeh; Mehdi Baghayeri
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

A carbon-paste electrode modified with ferrocenecarboxaldehyde and NiO nanoparticle (NiO/NPs) was used for the sensitive and selective voltammetric determination of cysteamine in the presence of tryptophan. The oxidation of cysteamine at the modified electrode was investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), chronoamperometry, and square-wave voltammetry (SWV). The values of the catalytic rate constant (kh) and diffusion coefficient (D) for cysteamine were calculated. The modified electrode exhibits an efficient electron-mediating behavior together with well-separated oxidation peaks for cysteamine and tryptophan. At the optimum pH of 7.0 in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution, the SWV anodic peak currents showed a linear relationship versus cysteamine concentrations in the range of 0.09–300.0 µM and a detection limit of 0.06 µM. Finally, the proposed method was also examined as a selective, simple, and precise electrochemical sensor for the determination of cysteamine in real samples such as urine and capsule.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Cysteamine is a significant thiol drug for the treatment of cystinosis [1]. Since cysteamine therapy has become available for patients with nephropathic cystinosis (MIM219800) in the early 1980s, quality of life for these patients has greatly improved [2, 3]. The most frequent and most severe form, infantile cystinosis, is characterized by the development of renal Fanconi syndrome in the first year of life and leads to end-stage renal disease in the first decade of life when untreated [4]. Mutations in the CTNS gene, encoding for lysosomal cystine transporter cystinosin, are the causes of cystinosis [5]. Lysosomal accumulation of cystine, which is the hallmark of this autosomal recessive disorder, can be depleted by the aminothiol cysteamine [6]. Although treatment with cysteamine substantially decreases intracellular cystine accumulation, renal Fanconi syndrome is not cured, but end-stage renal disease can be postponed in the majority of the patients. Numerous chemical and instrumental techniques for detection of cysteamine have been reported [7–11].Tryptophan (Trp), a vital constituent of proteins and a precursor for biologically important molecules such as the neurotransmitter serotonin and the neurohormone melatonin, is an amino acid essential to humans and animals due to its physiological roles [12]. It is also indispensable in human nutrition for establishing and maintaining a positive nitrogen balance [2]. In previous reports, spectroscopy [13], chemiluminescence [14], capillary electrophoresis [15], high-performance liquid chromatography [16], and electroanalysis [17–19] have been developed for tryptophan determination. Among these methods, electrochemical techniques, with high sensitivity, high accuracy, and simple operation, have been paid much more attention in the recent years [20–26]. However, the direct oxidation of Trp on the bare electrode is not attractive owing to sluggish electron-transfer processes and high overpotential [27].In the recent years, nanostructured materials have also been incorporated into electrochemical sensors for environmental, biological, and pharmaceutical analyses [28–31]. While they have many properties similar to other types of bulk materials, they offer unique advantages including enhanced electron transfer, large edge plane/basal plane ratios, and rapid kinetics of the electrode processes [32–35].Cysteamine is the simplest stable aminothiol and a degradation product of the amino acid, cysteine. On the other hand, tryptophan is an essential amino acid that has the same overpotential and the same overall structure of cysteamine. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a sensitive and selective method to measure each of those compounds separately and/or simultaneously. In this study, we have used voltammetric techniques to study the electrochemical behavior of cysteamine and tryptophan at an NiO/NPs paste electrode modified with ferrocenecarboxaldehyde (FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE). We reported ap-aminophenol-multiwall carbon nanotubes paste electrode for simultaneous determination of these compounds in the previous work. Compared to the previous report, this modified electrode has the best dynamic range, limit of detection, and good stability for determination of cysteamine in the presence of tryptophan.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) unless otherwise stated. Doubly distilled water was used throughout.Cysteamine and tryptophan were purchased from Merck and ferrocenecarboxaldehyde from Aldrich.1.0 × 10−2 mol L−1 cysteamine solution was prepared daily by dissolving 0.08 g cysteamine in water, and the solution was diluted to 100 mL with water. The solution was kept in the refrigerator at 4°C in the dark. More diluted solutions were prepared by serial dilutions with water.1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 tryptophan solution was prepared daily by dissolving 0.02 g tryptophan in a buffer solution, pH 7.0, in a 100 mL volumetric flask, and under ultrasonication for several minutes. More diluted solutions were prepared by serial dilutions with water.Phosphate buffer (sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium monohydrogen phosphate plus sodium hydroxide, 0.1 mol L−1) solutions (PBS) with different pH values were used.Graphite powder (particle size < 50μm) and high-viscosity paraffin oil (density = 0.88 Kg L−1) from Fluka were used for the preparation of the electrodes.


### 2.2. Apparatus

The composition, size, and structural properties of the prepared nanocomposites were characterized by some equipped analysis systems. X-ray powder diffraction studies were carried out using a STOE diffractometer with Cu-Ka radiation (k=1.54 Å).Square-wave voltammetry (SWV), cyclic voltammetry, and chronoamperometry were performed in an electroanalytical system,μ-Autolab PGSTAT 12, potentiostat/galvanostat connected to a three-electrode cell, Metrohm Model 663 VA stand linked with a computer (Pentium IV, 1200 MHz), and with Autolab software. A conventional three-electrode cell assembly consisting of a platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl/KClsat electrode as a reference electrode was used. The working electrode was either a carbon-paste electrode (CPE), NiO/NPs-modified carbon-paste electrode (NiO/NPs/CPE), FCAD/CPE, or FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE. A pH meter (Corning, Model 140) with a double-junction glass electrode was used to check the pH of the solutions.


### 2.3. Synthesis of NiO/NPs Nanoparticle

To prepare the NiO/NPs, in a typical experiment, a 0.5 M aqueous solution of nickel nitrate Ni (NO3)2 and a 0.5 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were prepared in distilled water. Then, the beaker containing NaOH solution was heated at the temperature of about 55°C. The Ni (NO3)2 solutions were added drop wise (slowly for 1.5 h) to the above heated solution under high-speed stirring. The beaker was sealed at this condition for 2 h. The precipitated NiO/NPs were cleaned with deionized water and ethanol then calcined at 300°C for 1.5 hours. Main reactions occuring during the experimental procedure can be written briefly as follows:
(1)2NaOH(s)⟶2Na+(aq)+2OH-(aq)(2)Ni(NO3)2·6H2O(s)⟶Ni2+(aq)+2NO3-(aq)+6H2O(aq)(3)Ni2+(aq)+2OH-(aq)+xH2O(aq)⟶Zn(OH)2·xH2O(s)↓(4)Ni(OH)2·xH2O(s)→100Ni(OH)2(s)+xH2O(g)↑(5)Ni(OH2)(s)→300NiO(s)+H2O(g)↑


### 2.4. Preparation of the Modified Electrode

15.0 mg of ferrocenecarboxaldehyde was hand mixed with 885 mg of graphite powder and 100 mg of NiO/NPs in a mortar and pestle. Using a syringe, 0.45 g of paraffin was added to the mixture and mixed well for 75 min until a uniformly wetted paste was obtained. The paste was then packed into a glass tube. Electrical contact was made by pushing a copper wire down the glass tube into the back of the mixture. When necessary, a new surface was obtained by pushing an excess of the paste out of the tube and polishing it on a weighing paper. The unmodified carbon-paste electrode was prepared in the same way without adding mediator and NiO/NPs to the mixture.


### 2.5. Preparation of Real Samples

Five cystagone 150 mg capsules produced by Mylan Drug Company were completely crushed and homogenized. Then, 10 mg of the powders was accurately weighed and dissolved with ultrasonication in 100 mL of ethanol-water (1 : 2) solution. Then, different amount of the solution plus 10 mL of 0.10 mol L−1 buffer (pH 7.0) was used for the analysis.The urine samples were obtained from the Sari Health Center and were stored in a refrigerator immediately after collection. Ten milliliters of the sample was centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.45μm filter and then diluted 5 times with universal buffer pH=7.0. The solution was transferred into the voltammetric cell to be analyzed without any further pretreatment. Standard addition method was used for the determination of cysteamine in real samples.


## 2.1. Chemicals

All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) unless otherwise stated. Doubly distilled water was used throughout.Cysteamine and tryptophan were purchased from Merck and ferrocenecarboxaldehyde from Aldrich.1.0 × 10−2 mol L−1 cysteamine solution was prepared daily by dissolving 0.08 g cysteamine in water, and the solution was diluted to 100 mL with water. The solution was kept in the refrigerator at 4°C in the dark. More diluted solutions were prepared by serial dilutions with water.1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 tryptophan solution was prepared daily by dissolving 0.02 g tryptophan in a buffer solution, pH 7.0, in a 100 mL volumetric flask, and under ultrasonication for several minutes. More diluted solutions were prepared by serial dilutions with water.Phosphate buffer (sodium dihydrogen phosphate and disodium monohydrogen phosphate plus sodium hydroxide, 0.1 mol L−1) solutions (PBS) with different pH values were used.Graphite powder (particle size < 50μm) and high-viscosity paraffin oil (density = 0.88 Kg L−1) from Fluka were used for the preparation of the electrodes.


## 2.2. Apparatus

The composition, size, and structural properties of the prepared nanocomposites were characterized by some equipped analysis systems. X-ray powder diffraction studies were carried out using a STOE diffractometer with Cu-Ka radiation (k=1.54 Å).Square-wave voltammetry (SWV), cyclic voltammetry, and chronoamperometry were performed in an electroanalytical system,μ-Autolab PGSTAT 12, potentiostat/galvanostat connected to a three-electrode cell, Metrohm Model 663 VA stand linked with a computer (Pentium IV, 1200 MHz), and with Autolab software. A conventional three-electrode cell assembly consisting of a platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode and an Ag/AgCl/KClsat electrode as a reference electrode was used. The working electrode was either a carbon-paste electrode (CPE), NiO/NPs-modified carbon-paste electrode (NiO/NPs/CPE), FCAD/CPE, or FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE. A pH meter (Corning, Model 140) with a double-junction glass electrode was used to check the pH of the solutions.


## 2.3. Synthesis of NiO/NPs Nanoparticle

To prepare the NiO/NPs, in a typical experiment, a 0.5 M aqueous solution of nickel nitrate Ni (NO3)2 and a 0.5 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were prepared in distilled water. Then, the beaker containing NaOH solution was heated at the temperature of about 55°C. The Ni (NO3)2 solutions were added drop wise (slowly for 1.5 h) to the above heated solution under high-speed stirring. The beaker was sealed at this condition for 2 h. The precipitated NiO/NPs were cleaned with deionized water and ethanol then calcined at 300°C for 1.5 hours. Main reactions occuring during the experimental procedure can be written briefly as follows:
(1)2NaOH(s)⟶2Na+(aq)+2OH-(aq)(2)Ni(NO3)2·6H2O(s)⟶Ni2+(aq)+2NO3-(aq)+6H2O(aq)(3)Ni2+(aq)+2OH-(aq)+xH2O(aq)⟶Zn(OH)2·xH2O(s)↓(4)Ni(OH)2·xH2O(s)→100Ni(OH)2(s)+xH2O(g)↑(5)Ni(OH2)(s)→300NiO(s)+H2O(g)↑


## 2.4. Preparation of the Modified Electrode

15.0 mg of ferrocenecarboxaldehyde was hand mixed with 885 mg of graphite powder and 100 mg of NiO/NPs in a mortar and pestle. Using a syringe, 0.45 g of paraffin was added to the mixture and mixed well for 75 min until a uniformly wetted paste was obtained. The paste was then packed into a glass tube. Electrical contact was made by pushing a copper wire down the glass tube into the back of the mixture. When necessary, a new surface was obtained by pushing an excess of the paste out of the tube and polishing it on a weighing paper. The unmodified carbon-paste electrode was prepared in the same way without adding mediator and NiO/NPs to the mixture.


## 2.5. Preparation of Real Samples

Five cystagone 150 mg capsules produced by Mylan Drug Company were completely crushed and homogenized. Then, 10 mg of the powders was accurately weighed and dissolved with ultrasonication in 100 mL of ethanol-water (1 : 2) solution. Then, different amount of the solution plus 10 mL of 0.10 mol L−1 buffer (pH 7.0) was used for the analysis.The urine samples were obtained from the Sari Health Center and were stored in a refrigerator immediately after collection. Ten milliliters of the sample was centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.45μm filter and then diluted 5 times with universal buffer pH=7.0. The solution was transferred into the voltammetric cell to be analyzed without any further pretreatment. Standard addition method was used for the determination of cysteamine in real samples.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Nanostructures Characterization

The XRD patterns of the NiO nanostructure showed diffraction peaks absorbed at2θ values (Figure 1). The prominent peaks were used to calculate the grain size via the Scherrer equation expressed as follows:
(6)D=Kλβcosθ,
where λ is the wavelength (λ=1.542 Å) (Cu-Kα), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the line, and θ is the diffraction angle. The grain size of the NiO nanostructure was 15 nm, and the peaks were observed at the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes. These peaks correspond to NiO.Figure 1
TEM image of NiO nanoparticles.The morphology of the as-grown nanostructures was characterized by TEM technique. Figure1 shows the TEM images of the product synthesized. Figure 1 shows a typical TEM image of the NiO/NPs. The dark spots correspond to NiO/NPs, which were only synthesized in our synthesis condition. NPs with near-spherical shapes were synthesized. It is clear that, in this case, an NiO nanoparticle was successfully prepared.


### 3.2. Electrochemistry of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE

Ferrocene-derivatives are known as good Ox/Red mediators with good electrochemical activity in the aqueous solution [36]. The electrochemical properties of the modified electrode were studied by cyclic voltammetry in the buffer solution (pH 7.0). The experimental results show well-defined and reproducible anodic and cathodic peaks related to the ferrocenecarboxaldehyde/ferroceniumcarboxaldehyde redox coupled with quasireversible behavior (with peak separation potential being ΔEp=Epa-Epc=80 mV) (Figure 2 curve a).Figure 2
Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the buffer solution at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE; (b) 1.0 mM cysteamine at FCAD/CPE; (c) 1.0 mM cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE; (d) 1.0 mM cysteamine at NiO/NPs/CPE; and (e) 1.0 mM cysteamine at CPE. Conditions: 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0), scan rate of 20 mV s−1.


### 3.3. Electrocatalytic Investigation

In the first stage to test the potential electrocatalytic activity of the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE, its cyclic voltammetric responses at 20 mV s−1 were obtained in, pH 7.0, phosphate buffer in the absence and in the presence of 1.0 mM cysteamine, and the data are presented in Figure 2. In the absence of cysteamine, a pair of well-defined redox peaks of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE can be observed (Figure 2, curve a). Upon the addition of 1.0 mM cysteamine, there was a drastic enhancement of the anodic peak current, and, in addition, no cathodic current was observed in the reverse scan (Figure 2, curve c). This behavior is consistent with a very strong electrocatalytic effect. Under the same experimental conditions, the direct oxidation of cysteamine at NiO/NPs/CPE and CPE shows an irreversible wave at more positive potentials (Figure 2, curves d and e). The catalytic peak potential is found to be about 420 mV, whereas that of the uncatalyzed peak is about 780 mV. Thus, a decrease in the overvoltage of approximately 360 mV and an enhancement of the peak current are also achieved with the modified electrode. In a similar condition, at a surface of FCAD/CPE (curve b), cysteamine has a less current if compared to FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE in the same condition that is relative to the presence of NiO/NPs at a surface of electrode with high conductivity in electrode matrix. On the basis of the information, we suggest the electrocatalytic mechanism in Scheme 1 for the oxidation of cysteamine at a surface of this sensor.Scheme 1Figure3 (inset) shows the voltammetric peaks potential of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE at scan rates ranging from 4 to 35 mV s−1 at pH 7.0 containing 0.5 mM cysteamine. We observed a linear variation of the peak current with the square root of scan rate (ν1/2) (r2=0.9913) (Figure 3). This result clearly indicates a diffusion-controlled electrooxidative process.Figure 3
Plot ofIpa versus ν1/2 for the oxidation of cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE. Inset: (A) cyclic voltammograms of 0.5 mM cysteamine at various scan rates: (a) 4; (b) 6; (c) 8; (d) 10; (e) 15; (f) 20; (g) 25, and (h) 35 mV s−1 in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0).To obtain information about the rate-determining step, the Tafel plot was drawn, as derived from points in the Tafel region of the cyclic voltammogram (Figure4). The slope of the Tafel plot was equal to 2.3RT/n(1-α)F, which came up to 0.1303 V/decade−1 for scan rates of 20 mV s−1, respectively. Therefore, we obtained the mean value of α equal to 0.55. In addition, the value of α was calculated for the oxidation of cysteamine at pH 7.0 for both the modified and unmodified carbon nanotubes paste electrodes using the following equation [37]:
(7)αnα=0.048EP-EP/2,
where EP/2 is the potential corresponding to IP/2. The values for αnα were found to be 0.54 and 0.11 at the surface of both FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE and the CPE, respectively. Those values show that the overpotential of cysteamine oxidation is reduced at the surface of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE and also that the rate of electron-transfer process is greatly enhanced. This phenomenon is, thus, confirmed by the larger Ipa values recorded during cyclic voltammetry at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE.Figure 4
Tafel plot for FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0) with scan rates of 20 mV s−1 in the presence of 1.0 mM cysteamine.Chronoamperometric measurements of cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE were carried out at the working electrode potential of 500 mV for various concentrations of cysteamine (Figure5(A)). For an electroactive material (cysteamine in this case) with a diffusion coefficient of D, the current observed for the electrochemical reaction at the mass transport limited condition is described by the Cottrell equation. Experimental plots of I versus t−1/2 were employed, with the best fits for 0.3 mM of cysteamine (Figure 5(B)). From the resulting slope and Cottrell equation, the mean value of the D was found to be 2.4 × 10−5 cm2 s−1.Figure 5
(A) Chronoamperograms obtained at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE (1) in the absence and in the presence of (2) 300.0μM cysteamine at pH 7.0. (B) Cottrell’s plot for the data from the chronoamperogram. (C) Dependence of Ic/IL on the t1/2 derived from the chronoamperogram data.Chronoamperometry can also be employed to evaluate the catalytic rate constant,kh, for the reaction between cysteamine and the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE according to the method of Galus [38]:
(8)ICIL=∏1/2γ1/2=∏1/2(kCbt)1/2,
where IC is the catalytic current of cysteamine at the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE, IL is the limited current in the absence of cysteamine, and t is the time elapsed (s). Based on the slope of the IC/IL versus t1/2 plot, kh can be obtained for a given cysteamine concentration (Figure 5(C)). From the values of the slopes, an average value of kh was found to be kh=1.5×105 mol−1 L s−1. The value of kh also explains the sharp feature of the catalytic peak observed for catalytic oxidation of cysteamine at the surface of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE.


### 3.4. Square-Wave Voltammetry Investigations

Since square-wave voltammetry, SWV, has a much higher current sensitivity and better resolution than cyclic voltammetry, it was used to estimate the lower limit of detection of cysteamine. Responses were linear with cysteamine concentrations ranging from 0.09 to 300μM and a current sensitivity of 0.274 μA/(μmol/L). The detection limit was determined at 0.06 μM cysteamine according to the definition of YLOD=YB+3σ.The main objective of the present work was to develop a modified electrode that is capable of both electrocatalytic oxidation of cysteamine and separation of the electrochemical responses of cysteamine and tryptophan. As we know, peaks potentials for oxidation of cysteamine and tryptophan at an unmodified electrode are about 780 and 800 mV, respectively [39]. These results show, at unmodified NiO/NPs/CPE, that the peaks potentials of cysteamine and tryptophan overlapped with each other [39]. On the other hand, at the modified electrode, these compounds have two well-separated peaks potentials (with a 420 mV separation of the peaks) (Figure 6 inset). Therefore, the modifier has a critical role, and it is necessary for determination of cysteamine and tryptophan simultaneously.Figure 6
Plot of peak currents versus cysteamine concentration. Insert: square-wave voltammograms of cysteamine and tryptophan under the optimum conditions. 20.0μM tryptophan with cysteamine concentrations of (from inner to outer) (1) 0.1(2); 2.0; (3) 8.0; (4) 13.0; and (5) 25.0 μM.Figure6 inset shows typical SWV for the simultaneous determination of cysteamine and tryptophan. Figure 6 shows the dependence of SWV peak currents on the concentration of cysteamine. The SW voltammetric results showed that simultaneous determination of cysteamine and tryptophan with two well-distinguished anodic peaks at 380 and 800 mV potentials, corresponding to the oxidation of cysteamine and tryptophan, is possible at the modified electrode.The sensitivities of the modified electrode towards the oxidation of cysteamine in the absence and presence of tryptophan were found to be 0.296 and 0.274μA/μM, respectively. It is interesting to note that the sensitivities of the modified electrode towards cysteamine in the absence and presence of tryptophan were virtually the same, which indicates that the oxidation processes of cysteamine and tryptophan at the modified electrode are independent and that simultaneous or independent measurements of the two compounds are, therefore, possible without any interference.


### 3.5. Interference Study

In order to evaluate the selectivity of the proposed method in cysteamine determination, the effects of various foreign species on the determination of 10.0μM cysteamine were investigated. The tolerance limit was taken as the maximum concentration of the foreign substances causing an approximately ±5% relative error in the determination. The results are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Interference study for the determination of 10.0 µM cysteamine under the optimized conditions.
Species
Tolerant limits(WSubstance/WCysteamine)
Glucose, fructose, lactose, and sucrose
9000
Valine, methionine, glycine,  lucine, histidine, glutamic acid, alanine, glycine, and phenylalanine
800
Li+, Cl−, CO32-, ClO4-, SO42-, SCN−, Na+, Mg2+, K+, and Ca+2
700
Ascorbic acid*, thiourea, urea, and uric acid
400
Starch
Saturation
*After addition of 1 mM ascorbic oxidase.


### 3.6. Determination of CA in Real Samples

In order to demonstrate the electrocatalytic oxidation of cysteamine in real samples, we examined the voltammetric determination of cysteamine in capsule and urine samples. The result was also compared with the standard method used for cysteamine determination. The proposed sensor was also compared with a published method [39] in real sample analysis, the results of which are given in Table 2. The precision of the measurements was checked using the F-test method. As the results showed, the calculated F-values from the experimental data (Fex) are less than the values obtained from the F-test table (Ftab, P=0.05) with the same degree of freedom. In addition, the accuracy of the obtained results by the proposed sensor was checked Student’s t-test. As shown in Table 2, the measured t-values from the experimental data (tex) are less than the obtained t-values from Student’s t-test table (ttab, P=0.05) with the same degree of freedom. These results confirm that the precision and accuracy of the proposed method are acceptable. It can be seen that the determination of cysteamine using the modified electrode is effective and can be applied for their detection of cysteamine in real samples.Table 2
Determination of cysteamine in real samples (n=3).
Sample
Added (µM)
Expected (µM)
Founded (µM)
Founded [39] (µM)
F
ex
F
tab
t
ex
t
tab
Capsule
—
10.00
9.88
±
0.32
10.25
±
0.45
6.5
19
1.9
3.8
10.00
20.00
20.55
±
0.56
20.68
±
0.75
—
—
—
5.00
25.00
24.95
±
0.22
25.55
±
0.50
—
—
—
Urinea
—
—
<LOD
<LOD
—
—
—
15.00
15.00
15.65
±
0.75
15.87
±
1.00
8.9
19
2.3
3.8
10.00
25.00
25.79
±
0.89
25.95
±
1.04
—
—
—
Urineb
—
—
5.55
±
0.45
5.67
±
0.84
7.5
19
2.1
3.8
aHealthy person.
bUrine samples of patients undergoing treatment with cysteamine.


## 3.1. Nanostructures Characterization

The XRD patterns of the NiO nanostructure showed diffraction peaks absorbed at2θ values (Figure 1). The prominent peaks were used to calculate the grain size via the Scherrer equation expressed as follows:
(6)D=Kλβcosθ,
where λ is the wavelength (λ=1.542 Å) (Cu-Kα), β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the line, and θ is the diffraction angle. The grain size of the NiO nanostructure was 15 nm, and the peaks were observed at the (111), (200), (220), (311), and (222) planes. These peaks correspond to NiO.Figure 1
TEM image of NiO nanoparticles.The morphology of the as-grown nanostructures was characterized by TEM technique. Figure1 shows the TEM images of the product synthesized. Figure 1 shows a typical TEM image of the NiO/NPs. The dark spots correspond to NiO/NPs, which were only synthesized in our synthesis condition. NPs with near-spherical shapes were synthesized. It is clear that, in this case, an NiO nanoparticle was successfully prepared.


## 3.2. Electrochemistry of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE

Ferrocene-derivatives are known as good Ox/Red mediators with good electrochemical activity in the aqueous solution [36]. The electrochemical properties of the modified electrode were studied by cyclic voltammetry in the buffer solution (pH 7.0). The experimental results show well-defined and reproducible anodic and cathodic peaks related to the ferrocenecarboxaldehyde/ferroceniumcarboxaldehyde redox coupled with quasireversible behavior (with peak separation potential being ΔEp=Epa-Epc=80 mV) (Figure 2 curve a).Figure 2
Cyclic voltammograms of (a) the buffer solution at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE; (b) 1.0 mM cysteamine at FCAD/CPE; (c) 1.0 mM cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE; (d) 1.0 mM cysteamine at NiO/NPs/CPE; and (e) 1.0 mM cysteamine at CPE. Conditions: 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0), scan rate of 20 mV s−1.


## 3.3. Electrocatalytic Investigation

In the first stage to test the potential electrocatalytic activity of the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE, its cyclic voltammetric responses at 20 mV s−1 were obtained in, pH 7.0, phosphate buffer in the absence and in the presence of 1.0 mM cysteamine, and the data are presented in Figure 2. In the absence of cysteamine, a pair of well-defined redox peaks of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE can be observed (Figure 2, curve a). Upon the addition of 1.0 mM cysteamine, there was a drastic enhancement of the anodic peak current, and, in addition, no cathodic current was observed in the reverse scan (Figure 2, curve c). This behavior is consistent with a very strong electrocatalytic effect. Under the same experimental conditions, the direct oxidation of cysteamine at NiO/NPs/CPE and CPE shows an irreversible wave at more positive potentials (Figure 2, curves d and e). The catalytic peak potential is found to be about 420 mV, whereas that of the uncatalyzed peak is about 780 mV. Thus, a decrease in the overvoltage of approximately 360 mV and an enhancement of the peak current are also achieved with the modified electrode. In a similar condition, at a surface of FCAD/CPE (curve b), cysteamine has a less current if compared to FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE in the same condition that is relative to the presence of NiO/NPs at a surface of electrode with high conductivity in electrode matrix. On the basis of the information, we suggest the electrocatalytic mechanism in Scheme 1 for the oxidation of cysteamine at a surface of this sensor.Scheme 1Figure3 (inset) shows the voltammetric peaks potential of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE at scan rates ranging from 4 to 35 mV s−1 at pH 7.0 containing 0.5 mM cysteamine. We observed a linear variation of the peak current with the square root of scan rate (ν1/2) (r2=0.9913) (Figure 3). This result clearly indicates a diffusion-controlled electrooxidative process.Figure 3
Plot ofIpa versus ν1/2 for the oxidation of cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE. Inset: (A) cyclic voltammograms of 0.5 mM cysteamine at various scan rates: (a) 4; (b) 6; (c) 8; (d) 10; (e) 15; (f) 20; (g) 25, and (h) 35 mV s−1 in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0).To obtain information about the rate-determining step, the Tafel plot was drawn, as derived from points in the Tafel region of the cyclic voltammogram (Figure4). The slope of the Tafel plot was equal to 2.3RT/n(1-α)F, which came up to 0.1303 V/decade−1 for scan rates of 20 mV s−1, respectively. Therefore, we obtained the mean value of α equal to 0.55. In addition, the value of α was calculated for the oxidation of cysteamine at pH 7.0 for both the modified and unmodified carbon nanotubes paste electrodes using the following equation [37]:
(7)αnα=0.048EP-EP/2,
where EP/2 is the potential corresponding to IP/2. The values for αnα were found to be 0.54 and 0.11 at the surface of both FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE and the CPE, respectively. Those values show that the overpotential of cysteamine oxidation is reduced at the surface of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE and also that the rate of electron-transfer process is greatly enhanced. This phenomenon is, thus, confirmed by the larger Ipa values recorded during cyclic voltammetry at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE.Figure 4
Tafel plot for FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS (pH 7.0) with scan rates of 20 mV s−1 in the presence of 1.0 mM cysteamine.Chronoamperometric measurements of cysteamine at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE were carried out at the working electrode potential of 500 mV for various concentrations of cysteamine (Figure5(A)). For an electroactive material (cysteamine in this case) with a diffusion coefficient of D, the current observed for the electrochemical reaction at the mass transport limited condition is described by the Cottrell equation. Experimental plots of I versus t−1/2 were employed, with the best fits for 0.3 mM of cysteamine (Figure 5(B)). From the resulting slope and Cottrell equation, the mean value of the D was found to be 2.4 × 10−5 cm2 s−1.Figure 5
(A) Chronoamperograms obtained at FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE (1) in the absence and in the presence of (2) 300.0μM cysteamine at pH 7.0. (B) Cottrell’s plot for the data from the chronoamperogram. (C) Dependence of Ic/IL on the t1/2 derived from the chronoamperogram data.Chronoamperometry can also be employed to evaluate the catalytic rate constant,kh, for the reaction between cysteamine and the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE according to the method of Galus [38]:
(8)ICIL=∏1/2γ1/2=∏1/2(kCbt)1/2,
where IC is the catalytic current of cysteamine at the FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE, IL is the limited current in the absence of cysteamine, and t is the time elapsed (s). Based on the slope of the IC/IL versus t1/2 plot, kh can be obtained for a given cysteamine concentration (Figure 5(C)). From the values of the slopes, an average value of kh was found to be kh=1.5×105 mol−1 L s−1. The value of kh also explains the sharp feature of the catalytic peak observed for catalytic oxidation of cysteamine at the surface of FCAD/NiO/NPs/CPE.


## 3.4. Square-Wave Voltammetry Investigations

Since square-wave voltammetry, SWV, has a much higher current sensitivity and better resolution than cyclic voltammetry, it was used to estimate the lower limit of detection of cysteamine. Responses were linear with cysteamine concentrations ranging from 0.09 to 300μM and a current sensitivity of 0.274 μA/(μmol/L). The detection limit was determined at 0.06 μM cysteamine according to the definition of YLOD=YB+3σ.The main objective of the present work was to develop a modified electrode that is capable of both electrocatalytic oxidation of cysteamine and separation of the electrochemical responses of cysteamine and tryptophan. As we know, peaks potentials for oxidation of cysteamine and tryptophan at an unmodified electrode are about 780 and 800 mV, respectively [39]. These results show, at unmodified NiO/NPs/CPE, that the peaks potentials of cysteamine and tryptophan overlapped with each other [39]. On the other hand, at the modified electrode, these compounds have two well-separated peaks potentials (with a 420 mV separation of the peaks) (Figure 6 inset). Therefore, the modifier has a critical role, and it is necessary for determination of cysteamine and tryptophan simultaneously.Figure 6
Plot of peak currents versus cysteamine concentration. Insert: square-wave voltammograms of cysteamine and tryptophan under the optimum conditions. 20.0μM tryptophan with cysteamine concentrations of (from inner to outer) (1) 0.1(2); 2.0; (3) 8.0; (4) 13.0; and (5) 25.0 μM.Figure6 inset shows typical SWV for the simultaneous determination of cysteamine and tryptophan. Figure 6 shows the dependence of SWV peak currents on the concentration of cysteamine. The SW voltammetric results showed that simultaneous determination of cysteamine and tryptophan with two well-distinguished anodic peaks at 380 and 800 mV potentials, corresponding to the oxidation of cysteamine and tryptophan, is possible at the modified electrode.The sensitivities of the modified electrode towards the oxidation of cysteamine in the absence and presence of tryptophan were found to be 0.296 and 0.274μA/μM, respectively. It is interesting to note that the sensitivities of the modified electrode towards cysteamine in the absence and presence of tryptophan were virtually the same, which indicates that the oxidation processes of cysteamine and tryptophan at the modified electrode are independent and that simultaneous or independent measurements of the two compounds are, therefore, possible without any interference.


## 3.5. Interference Study

In order to evaluate the selectivity of the proposed method in cysteamine determination, the effects of various foreign species on the determination of 10.0μM cysteamine were investigated. The tolerance limit was taken as the maximum concentration of the foreign substances causing an approximately ±5% relative error in the determination. The results are shown in Table 1.Table 1
Interference study for the determination of 10.0 µM cysteamine under the optimized conditions.
Species
Tolerant limits(WSubstance/WCysteamine)
Glucose, fructose, lactose, and sucrose
9000
Valine, methionine, glycine,  lucine, histidine, glutamic acid, alanine, glycine, and phenylalanine
800
Li+, Cl−, CO32-, ClO4-, SO42-, SCN−, Na+, Mg2+, K+, and Ca+2
700
Ascorbic acid*, thiourea, urea, and uric acid
400
Starch
Saturation
*After addition of 1 mM ascorbic oxidase.


## 3.6. Determination of CA in Real Samples

In order to demonstrate the electrocatalytic oxidation of cysteamine in real samples, we examined the voltammetric determination of cysteamine in capsule and urine samples. The result was also compared with the standard method used for cysteamine determination. The proposed sensor was also compared with a published method [39] in real sample analysis, the results of which are given in Table 2. The precision of the measurements was checked using the F-test method. As the results showed, the calculated F-values from the experimental data (Fex) are less than the values obtained from the F-test table (Ftab, P=0.05) with the same degree of freedom. In addition, the accuracy of the obtained results by the proposed sensor was checked Student’s t-test. As shown in Table 2, the measured t-values from the experimental data (tex) are less than the obtained t-values from Student’s t-test table (ttab, P=0.05) with the same degree of freedom. These results confirm that the precision and accuracy of the proposed method are acceptable. It can be seen that the determination of cysteamine using the modified electrode is effective and can be applied for their detection of cysteamine in real samples.Table 2
Determination of cysteamine in real samples (n=3).
Sample
Added (µM)
Expected (µM)
Founded (µM)
Founded [39] (µM)
F
ex
F
tab
t
ex
t
tab
Capsule
—
10.00
9.88
±
0.32
10.25
±
0.45
6.5
19
1.9
3.8
10.00
20.00
20.55
±
0.56
20.68
±
0.75
—
—
—
5.00
25.00
24.95
±
0.22
25.55
±
0.50
—
—
—
Urinea
—
—
<LOD
<LOD
—
—
—
15.00
15.00
15.65
±
0.75
15.87
±
1.00
8.9
19
2.3
3.8
10.00
25.00
25.79
±
0.89
25.95
±
1.04
—
—
—
Urineb
—
—
5.55
±
0.45
5.67
±
0.84
7.5
19
2.1
3.8
aHealthy person.
bUrine samples of patients undergoing treatment with cysteamine.


## 4. Conclusion

In this study, carbon-paste electrode modified with ferrocenecarboxaldehyde and NiO/NPs was used for the determination of cysteamine in the presence of tryptophan. The electrochemical investigations showed effective electrocatalytic activity of the modified electrode in lowering the anodic overpotential for the oxidation of cysteamine and complete resolution of its anodic wave from tryptophan. A peak potential difference of 420 mV between cysteamine and tryptophan was detected, which was large enough to determine cysteamine and tryptophan individually and simultaneously.



---

*Source: 946230-2013-10-31.xml*