# Antibiotic Resistance Pattern and Evaluation of Metallo-Beta Lactamase Genes Includingbla-IMP andbla-VIM Types in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Patients in Tehran Hospitals

Authors: Samira Aghamiri; Nour Amirmozafari; Jalil Fallah Mehrabadi; Babak Fouladtan; Hossein Samadi Kafil
Journal: ISRN Microbiology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Beta-lactamase producing strains ofPseudomonas aeruginosa are important etiological agents of hospital infections. Carbapenems are among the most effective antibiotics used against Pseudomonas infections, but they can be rendered infective by group B β-lactamase, commonly called metallo-beta lactamase. In this study, the antimicrobial sensitivity patterns of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from 9 different hospitals in Tehran, Iran, as well as the prevalence of MBLs genes (bla-VIM and bla-IMP) were determined. A total of 212 strains of P. aeruginosa recovered from patients in hospitals in Tehran were confirmed by both biochemical methods and PCR. Their antimicrobial sensitivity patterns were determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Following MIC determination, imipenem resistant strains were selected by DDST method which was followed by PCR tests for determination of MBLs genes: bla-IMP and bla-VIM. The results indicated that, in the DDST phenotypic method, among the 100 imipenem resistant isolates, 75 strains were MBLs positive. The PCR test indicated that 70 strains (33%) carried bla-VIM gene and 20 strains (9%) harbored bla-IMP. The results indicated that the extent of antibiotic resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa is on the rise. This may be due to production of MBLs enzymes. Therefore, determination of antibiotic sensitivity patterns and MBLs production by these bacteria, can be important in control of clinical Pseudomonas infection.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosais one of the commonest causes of infection in burn patients and an important agent for hospital acquired infections and death in immunocompromised such as cystic fibrosis and cancer patients [1]. This bacterium is often resistant to many antimicrobial agents. The cause of resistance can be efflux pumps, decreased outer membrane permeability, and secretion of beta-lactamase enzymes [2]. Several kinds of beta-lactamase enzymes have been recognized. These enzymes were initially seen in Gram-negative bacteria which were detected in periplasmic space [3]. Metallo-beta lactamases are classified in group B of Ambler classification. This group is divided into three subclasses: BI, BII, and BIII. The BI subclass is divided into four categories according to their molecular structures: the IMP, VIM, GIM, and SPM types [4]. The first MBLs enzymes were IMP-1 which was initially found inS. marcescens in Japan (1991), VIM-1 originally detected in Italy (1997), SPM-1 first detected in Brazil (1997), and finally GIM detected in Germany (2002) [5, 6]. Carbapenems are effective antibiotics againstPseudomonas infections. But because the genes for MBLs are often carried on plasmids and class I integron, they can rapidly spread among different species of this bacterium and other bacteria [7, 8]. MBLs can potently hydrolyze all beta-lactam antibiotics except azetreonam. These enzymes require zinc ion as cofactor [9]. Hence, their activity is inhibited by chelators like ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), sodium mercaptoacetic acid (SMA), 2-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), and dipicolinic acid (DPA). Sulbactam, tazobactam, and clavulanic acid which are often used to inhibit beta-lactamase enzymes are not effective against MBLs [2, 10]. Several phenotypic methods are available for detection of MBLs producing bacteria. All these methods are based on the ability of metal chelators such as EDTA to inhibit the activity of MBLs. The double disk synergy test method was employed in this investigation [9]. The goal of this study was to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern inP. aeruginosaspecies isolated from nine hospitals in Tehran, Iran, and evaluate the prevalence of MBLs genes,bla-VIM andbla-IMP, in imipenem resistance strains.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Collection of Strains

A total of 212 strains ofP. aeruginosawere collected during six-month period from October 2011 to March 2012 from Motahari, Shariati, Hashemi Nejad, Kasra, Hazrat Rasoul, Milad, Mehr, Tebbi Kodakan, and Baghiatallah hospitals in Tehran, Iran. These strains were isolated from wound, blood, urine, trachea, sputum, pleural fluid, eye, catheter, and larynges samples. 148 isolates were obtained from male patients and 64 isolates from female patients. These isolates were subcultured on Brucella agar and their identification was performed by both biochemical methods such as oxidase test, catalase test, OF test, growth at 42°C, and PCR using specific primers foroprL gene (oprL is a constitutively produced peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein which contains covalently bound fatty acyl chains) [11]. Bacterial strains were preserved in Trypticase soy broth.


### 2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests

Antimicrobial sensitivity tests were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (Biolab-Hungary) by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [12] and interpreted according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) standard tables.Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 was used as control for the susceptibility tests. The antibiotic disks used were Imipenem (10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Gentamicin (10 μg), Tetracyclin (30 μg), Ceftazidime (30 μg), Cefotaxime (30 μg), Azithromycin (15 μg), Tobramycin (10 μg), Ticarcylin (75 μg), and Piperacillin (100 μg) (Padtan Teb, Iran). At first the bacteria were cultured into TSB and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. After 24 hours, microbial suspension was prepared equivalent to the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. With sterile swabs they were plated on MH agar. The antibiotic disks were placed on the plate and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, the diameters of the zone of inhibition were measured.


### 2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Determination of MIC was performed for imipenem resistant strains by agar dilution method according to CLSI standards. Isolates with MIC value of ≥16μg/mL were screened as MBLs producing strains.Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 was used as a control strain for the susceptibility testing.


### 2.4. Detection of MBLs Producing Isolates by Double Disk Synergy Test (DDST) Method

Imipenem resistance isolates were investigated for MBLs producing strains by DDST method. The bacterial suspension with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar [13]. For preparation of IMP-EDTA disk, 750 μg of EDTA solution was added to 10 μg imipenem disk and dried in an incubator [13]. At first, the bacterial suspension with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was prepared and cultured with sterile swab on MH agar. Then, two 10 μg imipenem and imipenem-EDTA disks were placed on the agar surface. After 18 hours of incubation at 35°C, the inhibition zone of imipenem disk and IMP-EDTA were measured. An increase of seven mm or more in the zone diameter for IMP-EDTA disk in comparison with imipenem disk alone was considered as a MBLs producing isolate [14].


### 2.5. DNA Extraction

DNA fromP. aeruginosa isolates was extracted by boiling method. In this method, a number of bacterial colonies were inoculated in 10 mL of LB broth and incubation at 37°C for 16 hours. 1.5 mL of the LB broth culture was centrifuged at 13,000 ×g at room temperature for 10 min. The bacterial pellet was suspended in 300 μL sterile water. The cells in the suspension were lysed by heating at 100°C for 10 min and the leftover cells were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 ×g at room temperature for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred into new tubes and used as template DNA for PCR reactions. For purity assurance, the template DNA was electrophoresed on agarose gel [10].


### 2.6. PCR Reaction for Confirmation ofPseudomonas aeruginosa Strains (oprL Gene)

PCR reaction for identification ofP. aeruginosa strains (oprL gene) was performed in a final volume of 25 μL: PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 0.75 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′ATG-GAA-ATG-CTG-AAA-TTC-GG-<C>3′) and reverse (5′CTT-CTT-CAG-CTC-GAC-GCG-AC-<G>3′) primers [11] 500 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 μL + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) 1 μL, distilled water 16.75 μL, and Template DNA 1 μL. The thermocycler program foroprL gene consisted of 3 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.


### 2.7. PCR Assays for Detection of MBLs Genes

#### 2.7.1. Primers

For design of primers, the nucleotide sequences ofbla-VIM andbla-IMP genes inP. aeruginosa were obtained from Gene bank and aligned with Clastalw2 software (alignment program). After identification of commonality region, Gene Runner program was used for primer design. Finally for confirmation of primer specificity, they were subjected to BLAST program.PCR reactions forbla-IMP andbla-VIM genes were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing the following.bla-
IMP. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′GTTTGAAGAAGTTAACGGGTGG3′) and reverse (5′ATAATTTGGCGGACTTTGGC3′) primers (designed) 459 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 3 μL, and distilled water 14.5 μL. The thermocycler program forbla-IMP gene consisted of 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 61°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.bla-
VIM. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′TGGTGTTTGGTCGCATATCG3′) and reverse (5′GAGCAAGTCTAGACCGCCCG3′) primers (designed) 595 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (50 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 2 μL, and distilled water 15.5 μL. Scheduled program forbla-VIM gene by thermocycler was 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 62°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min.Water was used as negative control andP. aeruginosa strains producing MBLs genes (bla-VIM andbla-IMP) (provided from Pasteur Institute, Iran) were used as positive controls for MBL detection.The PCR products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel (HT bioscience, UK) in TBE buffer and visualized with ethidium bromide staining and photographed with UV waves through Gel Documentation (Technogen, Iran) (Figures2, 3, and 4).


## 2.1. Collection of Strains

A total of 212 strains ofP. aeruginosawere collected during six-month period from October 2011 to March 2012 from Motahari, Shariati, Hashemi Nejad, Kasra, Hazrat Rasoul, Milad, Mehr, Tebbi Kodakan, and Baghiatallah hospitals in Tehran, Iran. These strains were isolated from wound, blood, urine, trachea, sputum, pleural fluid, eye, catheter, and larynges samples. 148 isolates were obtained from male patients and 64 isolates from female patients. These isolates were subcultured on Brucella agar and their identification was performed by both biochemical methods such as oxidase test, catalase test, OF test, growth at 42°C, and PCR using specific primers foroprL gene (oprL is a constitutively produced peptidoglycan-associated lipoprotein which contains covalently bound fatty acyl chains) [11]. Bacterial strains were preserved in Trypticase soy broth.


## 2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests

Antimicrobial sensitivity tests were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (Biolab-Hungary) by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [12] and interpreted according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) standard tables.Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 was used as control for the susceptibility tests. The antibiotic disks used were Imipenem (10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Gentamicin (10 μg), Tetracyclin (30 μg), Ceftazidime (30 μg), Cefotaxime (30 μg), Azithromycin (15 μg), Tobramycin (10 μg), Ticarcylin (75 μg), and Piperacillin (100 μg) (Padtan Teb, Iran). At first the bacteria were cultured into TSB and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. After 24 hours, microbial suspension was prepared equivalent to the turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. With sterile swabs they were plated on MH agar. The antibiotic disks were placed on the plate and incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, the diameters of the zone of inhibition were measured.


## 2.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Determination of MIC was performed for imipenem resistant strains by agar dilution method according to CLSI standards. Isolates with MIC value of ≥16μg/mL were screened as MBLs producing strains.Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 was used as a control strain for the susceptibility testing.


## 2.4. Detection of MBLs Producing Isolates by Double Disk Synergy Test (DDST) Method

Imipenem resistance isolates were investigated for MBLs producing strains by DDST method. The bacterial suspension with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard was prepared and cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar [13]. For preparation of IMP-EDTA disk, 750 μg of EDTA solution was added to 10 μg imipenem disk and dried in an incubator [13]. At first, the bacterial suspension with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was prepared and cultured with sterile swab on MH agar. Then, two 10 μg imipenem and imipenem-EDTA disks were placed on the agar surface. After 18 hours of incubation at 35°C, the inhibition zone of imipenem disk and IMP-EDTA were measured. An increase of seven mm or more in the zone diameter for IMP-EDTA disk in comparison with imipenem disk alone was considered as a MBLs producing isolate [14].


## 2.5. DNA Extraction

DNA fromP. aeruginosa isolates was extracted by boiling method. In this method, a number of bacterial colonies were inoculated in 10 mL of LB broth and incubation at 37°C for 16 hours. 1.5 mL of the LB broth culture was centrifuged at 13,000 ×g at room temperature for 10 min. The bacterial pellet was suspended in 300 μL sterile water. The cells in the suspension were lysed by heating at 100°C for 10 min and the leftover cells were removed by centrifugation at 13,000 ×g at room temperature for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred into new tubes and used as template DNA for PCR reactions. For purity assurance, the template DNA was electrophoresed on agarose gel [10].


## 2.6. PCR Reaction for Confirmation ofPseudomonas aeruginosa Strains (oprL Gene)

PCR reaction for identification ofP. aeruginosa strains (oprL gene) was performed in a final volume of 25 μL: PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 0.75 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′ATG-GAA-ATG-CTG-AAA-TTC-GG-<C>3′) and reverse (5′CTT-CTT-CAG-CTC-GAC-GCG-AC-<G>3′) primers [11] 500 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 μL + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) 1 μL, distilled water 16.75 μL, and Template DNA 1 μL. The thermocycler program foroprL gene consisted of 3 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 60°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.


## 2.7. PCR Assays for Detection of MBLs Genes

### 2.7.1. Primers

For design of primers, the nucleotide sequences ofbla-VIM andbla-IMP genes inP. aeruginosa were obtained from Gene bank and aligned with Clastalw2 software (alignment program). After identification of commonality region, Gene Runner program was used for primer design. Finally for confirmation of primer specificity, they were subjected to BLAST program.PCR reactions forbla-IMP andbla-VIM genes were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing the following.bla-
IMP. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′GTTTGAAGAAGTTAACGGGTGG3′) and reverse (5′ATAATTTGGCGGACTTTGGC3′) primers (designed) 459 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 3 μL, and distilled water 14.5 μL. The thermocycler program forbla-IMP gene consisted of 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 61°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.bla-
VIM. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′TGGTGTTTGGTCGCATATCG3′) and reverse (5′GAGCAAGTCTAGACCGCCCG3′) primers (designed) 595 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (50 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 2 μL, and distilled water 15.5 μL. Scheduled program forbla-VIM gene by thermocycler was 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 62°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min.Water was used as negative control andP. aeruginosa strains producing MBLs genes (bla-VIM andbla-IMP) (provided from Pasteur Institute, Iran) were used as positive controls for MBL detection.The PCR products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel (HT bioscience, UK) in TBE buffer and visualized with ethidium bromide staining and photographed with UV waves through Gel Documentation (Technogen, Iran) (Figures2, 3, and 4).


## 2.7.1. Primers

For design of primers, the nucleotide sequences ofbla-VIM andbla-IMP genes inP. aeruginosa were obtained from Gene bank and aligned with Clastalw2 software (alignment program). After identification of commonality region, Gene Runner program was used for primer design. Finally for confirmation of primer specificity, they were subjected to BLAST program.PCR reactions forbla-IMP andbla-VIM genes were performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing the following.bla-
IMP. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′GTTTGAAGAAGTTAACGGGTGG3′) and reverse (5′ATAATTTGGCGGACTTTGGC3′) primers (designed) 459 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 3 μL, and distilled water 14.5 μL. The thermocycler program forbla-IMP gene consisted of 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 61°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 5 min.bla-
VIM. PCR Buffer (10x) 2.5 μL, MgCl2 (50 mM) 1 μL, dNTPs (10 mM) 1 μL, forward (5′TGGTGTTTGGTCGCATATCG3′) and reverse (5′GAGCAAGTCTAGACCGCCCG3′) primers (designed) 595 bp (10 pmol/μL) 1 + 1 μL, Taq DNA polymerase (50 U/μL) 1 μL, template DNA 2 μL, and distilled water 15.5 μL. Scheduled program forbla-VIM gene by thermocycler was 4 min initial denaturation at 94°C, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 62°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min.Water was used as negative control andP. aeruginosa strains producing MBLs genes (bla-VIM andbla-IMP) (provided from Pasteur Institute, Iran) were used as positive controls for MBL detection.The PCR products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis in 1% (w/v) agarose gel (HT bioscience, UK) in TBE buffer and visualized with ethidium bromide staining and photographed with UV waves through Gel Documentation (Technogen, Iran) (Figures2, 3, and 4).


## 3. Results

In total, 212P. aeruginosaisolates were collected. After performing initial bacteriological tests, they were confirmed to beP. aeruginosa by PCR assay. They were obtained from clinical specimens such as wound (n=78), urine (n=62), blood (n=39), trachea (n=16), sputum (n=7), pleural fluid (n=5), eye (n=2), catheter (n=2), and larynges (n=1). The majority were from patients in burn unit (n=58) and the least were from patients in cardiac unit (n=1).


### 3.1. Antibiotic Susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility of the 212 isolates in the initial disk diffusion method against 10 antibiotics is presented in Figure1. The isolates showed high resistance to tetracycline (86%) and the most effective antibiotic was ciprofloxacin (44%).Figure 1
Antibiotic resistance among isolates ofP. aeruginosa.Figure 2
Electrophoresis ofoprL (500 bp) PCR products on agarose gel. Line 1 shows the positive control. Lines 2 and 3 showP. aeruginosa strains. Line 4 shows the negative control. Line 5 shows 100–1000 bp ladder.Figure 3
Electrophoresis ofbla-IMP (459 bp) PCR products on agarose gel. Line 1 is the positive control. Lines 2 and 3 show isolates positive forIMP. Line 4 is negative in PCR products. Line 5 shows 100–1000 bp ladder. Line 6 is negative control. Lines 7 and 8 show isolates positive forIMP.Figure 4
Agarose gel electrophoresis ofbla-VIM (595 bp) PCR products. Line 1 is 100–1000 bp ladder. Line 2 is positive control. Lines 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 show isolates positive forVIM. Line 8 is negative control.


### 3.2. MIC

Determination of MIC for imipenem by agar dilution method indicated that 47.16% (n=100) of the strains were resistant to imipenem (MIC ≥ 16 μg/mL).


### 3.3. Detection of MBLs Producing Isolates by Double Disk Method

In the double disk method performed on the 100 imipenem resistance isolates, 70 strains were shown to be positive by this phenotypic method.


### 3.4. Molecular Analysis

The PCR assays indicated that 20 (9%) of these strains contained theIMP gene, whereas 70 (33%) of them harbored theVIM gene.


## 3.1. Antibiotic Susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility of the 212 isolates in the initial disk diffusion method against 10 antibiotics is presented in Figure1. The isolates showed high resistance to tetracycline (86%) and the most effective antibiotic was ciprofloxacin (44%).Figure 1
Antibiotic resistance among isolates ofP. aeruginosa.Figure 2
Electrophoresis ofoprL (500 bp) PCR products on agarose gel. Line 1 shows the positive control. Lines 2 and 3 showP. aeruginosa strains. Line 4 shows the negative control. Line 5 shows 100–1000 bp ladder.Figure 3
Electrophoresis ofbla-IMP (459 bp) PCR products on agarose gel. Line 1 is the positive control. Lines 2 and 3 show isolates positive forIMP. Line 4 is negative in PCR products. Line 5 shows 100–1000 bp ladder. Line 6 is negative control. Lines 7 and 8 show isolates positive forIMP.Figure 4
Agarose gel electrophoresis ofbla-VIM (595 bp) PCR products. Line 1 is 100–1000 bp ladder. Line 2 is positive control. Lines 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 show isolates positive forVIM. Line 8 is negative control.


## 3.2. MIC

Determination of MIC for imipenem by agar dilution method indicated that 47.16% (n=100) of the strains were resistant to imipenem (MIC ≥ 16 μg/mL).


## 3.3. Detection of MBLs Producing Isolates by Double Disk Method

In the double disk method performed on the 100 imipenem resistance isolates, 70 strains were shown to be positive by this phenotypic method.


## 3.4. Molecular Analysis

The PCR assays indicated that 20 (9%) of these strains contained theIMP gene, whereas 70 (33%) of them harbored theVIM gene.


## 4. Discussion

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen [15, 16]. Different antibiotics are commonly used for the treatment ofPseudomonas infections, such as aminoglycosides, beta-lactamases, and quinolones [16–18]. Carbapenems are potent beta-lactam antibiotics against MBLs producing and multidrug resistanceP. aeruginosa [19]. There have been many recent reports that clinical isolates ofP. aeruginosa and Gram-negative bacilli are becoming resistant to carbapenems in many countries [19]. In recent years, MBLs have been identified from clinical isolates with increasing frequency across the world and strains that produce these enzymes have been responsible for prolonged treatment and acute infections [20]. A study from Japan showed that patients infected with MBLs producingP. aeruginosa needed to receive multiple antibiotics and infections leading to death due toIMPproducingP. aeruginosa were more common than those withbla-IMP negativeP. aeruginosa [21]. MBLs producingP. aeruginosa is a serious intimidation in hospital locations especially in burn units. These strains can create significant problem in treatment and spread of resistance among other bacteria [22]. Resistance to carbapenems via acquirement of MBLs genes amongP. aeruginosa strains have increased rapidly in Asia, Europe, and South America. This has led to a drastic change in the pattern of antibiotics usage against multidrug resistantP. aeruginosa [23]. Detection of MBLs producing strains can be effective for optimal treatment of patients particularly in burned and hospitalized patients and control the spread of resistance [6]. Resistance to imipenem is increasing in Iran in recent years [9, 22, 24–27]. The differences in the reported values between the present study and those reported earlier may be due to the difference in geographical regions, difference in kind of infections, the enormous usage of antibiotics, or difference in antibiotic therapy regimens in the selective hospitals in this study than those in other studies. Among the 100 isolates which were resistant to imipenem, 70 (70%) were found to be MBLs producers. In the other strains which were resistant to imipenem but were MBLs negative, resistance to imipenem may be due to efflux systems, decreased outer membrane permeability, or production of Ampc enzymes. For confirmation of MBLs producing strains, PCR is an important and accurate method [10]. In this study all isolates were screened forVIM andIMP genes by PCR. 20 isolates hadIMP gene and 70 isolates hadVIM gene. Of the 11 isolates that were negative with phenotypic method, 4 harboredIMP gene and 7 isolates hadVIM gene as detected by PCR. Also, 3 isolates that were positive with DDST method were negative with PCR. This shows that there may be genes other thanVIM andIMP responsible for MBLs trait.Yazdi et al. isolated 126P. aeruginosa strains from nonburn patients in Iran in 2007. Production of MBL in these isolates was determined byE-test, followed by PCR to detectbla-IMP andbla-VIM. Among 70 imipenem resistantP. aeruginosa strains, 8 strains produced MBLs byE-test all of which carriedbla-VIM. None of them were carriers ofbla-IMP gene [24]. In another study in Iran during 2008, Shahcheraghi et al. collected 243P. aeruginosa strains from nonburn patients. 22 strains were MBLs positive; 15 of them hadbla-VIM and none wasbla-IMP positive [25]. In a study carried out in India between 2005 and 2007, among 61P. aeruginosa strains collected, 20 strains produced MBLs. Of the 20 MBLs confirmed strain byE-test, 17 strains were subjected to PCR testing. 15 of these strains werebla-VIM positive and two isolates were negative for bothbla-VIM andbla-IMP and all were negative forbla-IMP [28]. In 2008, Khosravi and Mihani collected 100P. aeruginosa in Iran. Production of MBLs was determined both byE-test and PCR method. Among 41 imipenem resistantP. aeruginosa, 8 strains were shown to be MBLs producer byE-test and all of these 8 strains carriedbla-VIM and none of them hadbla-IMP [22]. In another study in Turkey, 100P. aeruginosa strains were collected from patients in a Turkish university hospital. One (1%) isolate was found to carrybla-VIM gene, whereas 9 (9%) carriedbla-IMP gene. Among 9 isolates that carriedbla-IMP gene, only 4 isolates were shown to be MBL producer byE-test [29]. In our study, the percent of strains that carriedbla-VIM andbla-IMP genes was higher than those reported in previous studies. The reasons maybe an overall increase in the extent of acquirement of MBLs genes amongP. aeruginosa. More MBLs genes are found to be located on the class I integron and can therefore easily transfer betweenP. aeruginosa strains [7]. In the majority of studies in Iran and other countriesvim-type MBL was the most prevalent gene reported [30–32].


## 5. Conclusion

This study illustrated that the majority ofP. aeruginosa strains were resistant to various antibiotics. The high rate of antibiotic resistanceamongP. aeruginosa strains is very alarming and can be responsible for serious infections. So identification of MBLs producing strains and taking efforts to reduce the rate of transfer between different strains are important goal for treatment ofP. aeruginosa infections.



---

*Source: 941507-2014-04-23.xml*