# Experimental Study on the Absorption of Toluene from Exhaust Gas by Paraffin/Surfactant/Water Emulsion

Authors: Ping Fang; Zi-jun Tang; Xiong-bo Chen; Zhi-xiong Tang; Ding-sheng Chen; Jian-hang Huang; Wen-hao Zeng; Chao-ping Cen
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

A new paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion (PSW) for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) controlling was prepared and its potential for VOCs removal was investigated. Results indicated that PSW-5 (5%, v/v) provided higher toluene absorption efficiency (90.77%) than the other absorbents used. The saturation pressure, Henry’s constant, and activity coefficient of toluene in PSW-5 were significantly lower than those in water, and toluene solubility (1.331 g·L−1) in the PSW-5 was more than 2.5 times higher than the value in water. Several factors potentially affecting the toluene absorption efficiency were systematically investigated. The results suggested that concentration and pH of PSW, absorption temperature, and gas flow rate all had a strong influence on the toluene absorption, but the inlet concentration of toluene had little effect on the toluene absorption. There were different absorbing performances of PSW-5 on different VOCs, and the ketones, esters, and aromatics were more easily removed by the PSW-5 than the alkanes. Regeneration and reuse of the PSW were possible; after 3 runs of regeneration the absorption efficiency of PSW-5 for toluene also could reach 82.42%. So, the PSW is an economic, efficient, and safe absorbent and has a great prospect in organic waste gas treatment.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

In recent years, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), due to their high volatility, reactivity, and toxicity to humans and environment, have received increasing attention as the air pollutants of serious concern [1]. In China, VOCs are classified as major contributors to air pollution, because they are the precursors of ground-level ozone and fine particles and contribute to ground level of smog formation, toxic and carcinogenic human health effects, and so on [2, 3]. Industrial source is considered as the largest source of anthropogenic VOCs emissions. With the rapid development of urbanization and industrialization in China, the VOCs emissions increase rapidly. It was reported that China’s industrial nonmethane VOCs emissions had increased by 11.6 times at an average annual rate of 8.5% from 1.15 million tons in 1980 to 13.35 million tons in 2010 [4], and it was estimated that industrial nonmethane VOCs emissions were more than 16.37 million tons in 2014. Now, the annual VOCs emission amount has exceeded that of NOx or SO2, and VOCs contamination has become a serious problem in China. In recent years, the Chinese government attaches great importance to VOCs pollution control. Accordingly, various environmental laws and regulations for the prevention and control of VOCs pollution have been enacted. So, in order to meet the stringent environment regulations, VOCs emission from industry must be effectively controlled.Many researches and engineering efforts are being explored to control VOCs emissions. Cleaner production technology and upstream process improvement can lead to a decrease in the VOCs emission, but in most cases it cannot achieve the VOCs emission standard. So, it is necessary to set up an air treatment process. Presently, various technologies have been developed to remove VOCs from exhaust gas and basically classified into two groups based on recovery and destruction [5]. Absorption [6], adsorption [7], membrane separation [8], and condensation [9] are classified as recovery techniques whereas thermal or catalytic oxidation [10], biological treatment [11], plasma technology [12], advanced oxidation process [13, 14], and biofiltration [15] are considered as destructive ones. They all have many advantages and limitations, and different technology has different application conditions, but no single technology can be used in all cases.Among them, absorption is generally considered to be a simple, economical, safe, and effective technology for removing medium/high concentration VOCs (VOCs concentrations from 500 to 5000 ppm) from exhaust gas with a absorption efficiency of 95–98% [16, 17]. The choice of a suitable absorbent is the key to successful application of the absorption. A suitable absorber should have the following characteristics [18]: high absorption capacity of VOCs, high-boiling and low vapor pressure, a low viscosity and a high diffusion coefficient, safety and no toxicity, and a low cost. According to aforesaid criteria and the principle of similarity and intermiscibility, water is widely used to absorb hydrophilic VOCs such as alcohols and ketones [19], and high-boiling organic absorbents, including silicon oil [20], cutting oil [21], fresh or waste vegetable oil and lubricant oil [16], poly(dimethylsiloxane) [22], di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate [3, 23], and surfactant solution [24], are used to absorb hydrophobic VOCs such as aromatic, halogenated hydrocarbons. Most of VOCs from industry exhaust gas are hydrophobic, which correspond to low solubility in water, but high solubility in high-boiling organic absorbents. However, organic absorbents’ high viscosity and security risk hinder their application [25]. In order to overcome the disadvantages of organic absorbent, emulsions such as surfactant/water [26] and water/oil emulsions [2] have been developed. They have low viscosity and high security and can remove VOCs efficiently. However, there is limited information on the absorption of VOCs using oil/surfactant/water emulsion in the literatures.In this study, paraffin was used to prepare emulsion, due to its high absorption capacity of VOCs, high stability, low cost (about 900 $·ton−1 in China), degradability, and no toxicity. Finally, a new paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion for VOCs controlling was prepared. Its potential for VOCs removal was investigated, and toluene was used as a typical industrial organic waste gas. A sequence of experiments was carried out in order to evaluate the influence of different operational parameters on VOCs absorption efficiency in a packed bed bubble column reactor, and the regeneration and reuse of used absorbent were studied. Meanwhile, the solubility, saturation pressure, Henry’s constant, and activity coefficient of toluene in the emulsion were also calculated.


## 2. Experimental Setup

### 2.1. Materials

Standard gases included air (99.999%), H2 (99.999%), and N2 (99.999%); they were the products of the Gas Co., Ltd., of Zhuo Zheng, Guangzhou, China. Benzene, toluene, xylene, ethyl acetate, hexane, acetone, and paraffin were purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory. Polyethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tween 80, and span 80 were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory. All reagents were of analytical grade and used without purification. Deionized water and tap water were applied to prepare the emulsion and the absorption solution, respectively.


### 2.2. Preparation of Emulsion and Absorption Solution

Preparation of Emulsion. ( 1 ) Mix tween 80 and span 80 with mass ratio of 1 : 0.4 and stir to prepare a combined surfactant with a HLB value of 12. (2) A certain amount of combined surfactant was dissolved in a certain amount of paraffin, then adding a certain amount of deionized water to the surfactant/paraffin mixed solution under the conditions of stirring to prepare paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion (hereinafter referred to as PSW). The composition ratio of emulsion is paraffin : surfactant : water = 9 : 1 : 4 (w : w : w), and the emulsion is a milky white and a little sticky liquid. The emulsion will be used to prepare the VOCs absorption solution.Preparation of Absorption Solution. 50 ml of emulsion was dissolved in 950 ml of tap water to make the solution that was used as VOCs absorption solution in this study (hereinafter referred to as PSW-5).


### 2.3. Experimental Setup

Figure1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus including VOC generator, organic waste gas simulation system, absorption reactor, absorption solution regeneration system, and online gas analysis system. The absorption reactor was heated with a temperature-controlled heating belt to ensure a constant absorption temperature.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus.(1) Mass flow controller; (2) VOC generator; (3) low temperature circulating water bath; (4) gas mixing bottle; (5) valve; (6) temperature controller and indicator; (7) absorption reactor; (8) dryer; (9) activated carbon; (10) gas analyzer; (11) serpentine condenser; (12) bottle.As shown in Figure1, air was obtained from cylinder and divided into four parts: part of it was sent directly into the gas mixing bottle, part of it was sent to pass through a toluene generator to carry out precalibrated toluene to form waste gas containing toluene, and left two parts were sent to pass through a benzene or other VOC generator to carry out precalibrated benzene or other VOC to form organic waste gases, respectively. Each part of air was metered through mass flow controllers (Beijing seven-star electronics Co., Ltd., China), and 4 kinds of gas finally mixed in the gas mixing bottle to form the simulated organic waste gas. The mass flow controller could be closed when a gas was not used. In this study the total flow rate of gas including toluene or other VOC (Qgas) was fixed to 1000 ml·min−1. The toluene concentrations in the inlet gas were varied in the range from 500 to 5200 mg·m−3. The toluene and other VOCs were generated from liquid organic reagents inside the VOC generators, cooled in a low temperature circulating water bath (THX-2005, Ningbo Tianheng Instrument Factory) with 30–60 ml·min−1 air as carrier gas. The concentration of toluene or other VOC was changed by altering cooling temperature and the flux of carrier gas.The experiments were performed in a countercurrent packed bed bubble column reactor made of borosilicate glass (4.5 cm in diameter and 90 cm in length). The column was packed with ceramic Raschig rings (12.5 mm in diameter and 12.5 mm in length); packed height was 30 cm. In each typical experiment, the temperature of water bath was adjusted to the constant value (5°C), and then 1 L absorption solution was put into the reactor. After 1 h, when the temperature of solution (25°C) and water bath (5°C),Qgas and VOCs concentration were stable; then the gas mixture continuously flowed through the absorption reactor. The concentrations of VOCs in the inlet and outlet were measured by a gas-chromatograph (Agilent 6890N, Agilent Technologies Inc., USA) coupled with a flame ionization detector and a portable digital PID VOC detector (ppbRAE 3000, RAE Systems Inc., USA) coupled with a PID sensor equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp. In order to protect the gas analyzer, a dryer was used to remove the moisture content in simulated organic waste gas. Finally, the vent gas was adsorbed by activated carbon.As shown in Figure1, the absorption solution was regenerated through heating at 100°C for 0.5 h for 1 run, and no gas was introduced into the absorption reactor during the regeneration. The toluene vapor entered the serpentine condenser where toluene was cooled until it condensed into a liquid, then the toluene liquid was collected in a glass bottle. Some amount of water would be lost due to evaporation during regeneration process, so it was necessary to add fresh water to prepare 1 L of the absorption solution after the regeneration, then the second experiment could be carried out.Surface tension and interfacial tension of liquid were measured by the surface/interfacial tension meter (DCAT21, Dataphysics Instrument Co., Ltd. Germany). The temperature of the heating belt was regulated by the Al-518P artificial intelligence temperature controller (Electrical Automation Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen Yu, China). A pH-electrode (PHS-3C, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Shang Hai, China) was immersed into the liquid to measure the pH value.The percent of VOCs absorption efficiency was determined by the following equation:(1)E%=Cin-CoutCin×100,where E is the VOCs absorption efficiency and Cin and Cout are the VOCs concentration in the inlet and outlet gas, respectively.


## 2.1. Materials

Standard gases included air (99.999%), H2 (99.999%), and N2 (99.999%); they were the products of the Gas Co., Ltd., of Zhuo Zheng, Guangzhou, China. Benzene, toluene, xylene, ethyl acetate, hexane, acetone, and paraffin were purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory. Polyethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tween 80, and span 80 were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory. All reagents were of analytical grade and used without purification. Deionized water and tap water were applied to prepare the emulsion and the absorption solution, respectively.


## 2.2. Preparation of Emulsion and Absorption Solution

Preparation of Emulsion. ( 1 ) Mix tween 80 and span 80 with mass ratio of 1 : 0.4 and stir to prepare a combined surfactant with a HLB value of 12. (2) A certain amount of combined surfactant was dissolved in a certain amount of paraffin, then adding a certain amount of deionized water to the surfactant/paraffin mixed solution under the conditions of stirring to prepare paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion (hereinafter referred to as PSW). The composition ratio of emulsion is paraffin : surfactant : water = 9 : 1 : 4 (w : w : w), and the emulsion is a milky white and a little sticky liquid. The emulsion will be used to prepare the VOCs absorption solution.Preparation of Absorption Solution. 50 ml of emulsion was dissolved in 950 ml of tap water to make the solution that was used as VOCs absorption solution in this study (hereinafter referred to as PSW-5).


## 2.3. Experimental Setup

Figure1 shows the schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus including VOC generator, organic waste gas simulation system, absorption reactor, absorption solution regeneration system, and online gas analysis system. The absorption reactor was heated with a temperature-controlled heating belt to ensure a constant absorption temperature.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus.(1) Mass flow controller; (2) VOC generator; (3) low temperature circulating water bath; (4) gas mixing bottle; (5) valve; (6) temperature controller and indicator; (7) absorption reactor; (8) dryer; (9) activated carbon; (10) gas analyzer; (11) serpentine condenser; (12) bottle.As shown in Figure1, air was obtained from cylinder and divided into four parts: part of it was sent directly into the gas mixing bottle, part of it was sent to pass through a toluene generator to carry out precalibrated toluene to form waste gas containing toluene, and left two parts were sent to pass through a benzene or other VOC generator to carry out precalibrated benzene or other VOC to form organic waste gases, respectively. Each part of air was metered through mass flow controllers (Beijing seven-star electronics Co., Ltd., China), and 4 kinds of gas finally mixed in the gas mixing bottle to form the simulated organic waste gas. The mass flow controller could be closed when a gas was not used. In this study the total flow rate of gas including toluene or other VOC (Qgas) was fixed to 1000 ml·min−1. The toluene concentrations in the inlet gas were varied in the range from 500 to 5200 mg·m−3. The toluene and other VOCs were generated from liquid organic reagents inside the VOC generators, cooled in a low temperature circulating water bath (THX-2005, Ningbo Tianheng Instrument Factory) with 30–60 ml·min−1 air as carrier gas. The concentration of toluene or other VOC was changed by altering cooling temperature and the flux of carrier gas.The experiments were performed in a countercurrent packed bed bubble column reactor made of borosilicate glass (4.5 cm in diameter and 90 cm in length). The column was packed with ceramic Raschig rings (12.5 mm in diameter and 12.5 mm in length); packed height was 30 cm. In each typical experiment, the temperature of water bath was adjusted to the constant value (5°C), and then 1 L absorption solution was put into the reactor. After 1 h, when the temperature of solution (25°C) and water bath (5°C),Qgas and VOCs concentration were stable; then the gas mixture continuously flowed through the absorption reactor. The concentrations of VOCs in the inlet and outlet were measured by a gas-chromatograph (Agilent 6890N, Agilent Technologies Inc., USA) coupled with a flame ionization detector and a portable digital PID VOC detector (ppbRAE 3000, RAE Systems Inc., USA) coupled with a PID sensor equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp. In order to protect the gas analyzer, a dryer was used to remove the moisture content in simulated organic waste gas. Finally, the vent gas was adsorbed by activated carbon.As shown in Figure1, the absorption solution was regenerated through heating at 100°C for 0.5 h for 1 run, and no gas was introduced into the absorption reactor during the regeneration. The toluene vapor entered the serpentine condenser where toluene was cooled until it condensed into a liquid, then the toluene liquid was collected in a glass bottle. Some amount of water would be lost due to evaporation during regeneration process, so it was necessary to add fresh water to prepare 1 L of the absorption solution after the regeneration, then the second experiment could be carried out.Surface tension and interfacial tension of liquid were measured by the surface/interfacial tension meter (DCAT21, Dataphysics Instrument Co., Ltd. Germany). The temperature of the heating belt was regulated by the Al-518P artificial intelligence temperature controller (Electrical Automation Technology Co., Ltd., Xiamen Yu, China). A pH-electrode (PHS-3C, INESA Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. Shang Hai, China) was immersed into the liquid to measure the pH value.The percent of VOCs absorption efficiency was determined by the following equation:(1)E%=Cin-CoutCin×100,where E is the VOCs absorption efficiency and Cin and Cout are the VOCs concentration in the inlet and outlet gas, respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Choice of Absorption Solution

In this study, several common solutions such as polyethylene glycol (5%, v/v), paraffin (5%, v/v), tween 80 (0.1%, w/v), DMSO (50%, v/v), and tap water were used to remove toluene and compared with the PSW-5 absorption. It is worth to note that serious foaming problem was caused when the concentration of tween 80 was more than 0.1% (w/v), so its concentration was 0.1% (w/v) in this experiment. Both absorption temperature (25°C) and toluene concentration (1650 mg·L−1) were stable. The results are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the toluene absorption efficiencies of six kinds of absorbents all decreased by time due to the gradual saturation of absorbents. As the absorption continued, the toluene concentration in the absorbent was raised, leading to the absorption efficiency decrease. As shown in Figure 2, the water had lowest absorption efficiency and shortest saturation time for hydrophobic and nonpolar toluene. So water is not a suitable absorbent for hydrophobic and nonpolar VOCs removal in industry. Compared with water, other absorbents all could promote the absorption of toluene. Toluene absorption capacity of six kinds of absorbents was PSW-5 > DMSO > paraffin > polyethylene glycol > tween 80 > water, with the average absorption efficiencies of 90.77%, 72.41%, 57.28%, 33.73%, 27.57%, and 10.77%, respectively. So, PSW appears clearly to be better absorbent than others as it has high capacity of toluene absorption; meanwhile, it has low production cost and high security. Therefore, PSW is a very attractive absorbent for controlling VOCs.Figure 2
The effect of absorbents on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


### 3.2. Effect of PSW Concentration

PSW concentration is an important effect factor to toluene absorption; it can be seen from Figure3 that the toluene absorption efficiencies increased with the increment of PSW concentration. A sharp increase in toluene absorption efficiency from 55.54% to 90.77% was observed when the concentration varied from 0.5% to 5% (v/v). This is because the increase of PSW concentration can increase the nonpolarity of absorption solution and cause higher absorption efficiency towards nonpolar VOCs.Figure 3
The effect of PSW concentration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.As listed in Table1, the values of surface tension and interfacial tension between toluene and PSW decrease with the increase of PSW concentration. So the higher concentration of PSW can effectively promote the toluene absorption and lead to a high absorption efficiency of toluene. When the PSW concentration continued to increase, the absorption efficiency was still increasing, but the rate of increase of toluene absorption efficiency became slow. For example, when the PSW concentration increased from 5% to 10% (v/v), toluene absorption efficiency increased only from 90.77% to about 97.58%. It is speculated that the constant of gas-liquid contact time is the main cause of this phenomenon. Considering the pollutant emission concentration, pollutant emission standard, PSW costs, and security, PSW concentration in this study was selected as 5% (v/v).Table 1
Surface tension and interfacial tension between toluene and PSW at 25°C.
Concentrations of PSW (v/v) 0.5% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 10.0% Surface tension (mN·m−1) 37.526 ± 0.030 37.126 ± 0.023 36.945 ± 0.024 36.651 ± 0.026 36.572 ± 0.027 36.489 ± 0.030 Interfacial tension (mN·m−1) 17.493 ± 0.014 16.541 ± 0.010 16.127 ± 0.015 15.299 ± 0.007 13.987 ± 0.011 13.684 ± 0.005


### 3.3. Effect of Initial pH of PSW

Organic waste gas emitted by certain industries contains acidic substances in actual production, or the water for preparation of solution is acidic or alkaline; these factors will lead to changes in the absorption solution pH, thereby affecting the VOCs absorption. In this study, the initial pH of PSW-5 was 7.5, and the pH was adjusted to the desired value by adding HCl or NaOH.As shown in Figure4, pH is one of important effect factors to toluene absorption. When the initial pH of PSW-5 changed from 4 to 6, toluene absorption efficiency sharply increased from 79.78% to 90.17%, then almost retained stable when solution pH varied from 6.0 to 7.5, and thereafter decreased with an increase of solution pH between 7.5 and 9.2. This is because the polarity of PSW-5 increases with the increase of initial pH in the alkaline solution and the decrease of initial pH in the acidic solution; meanwhile, strong acid or alkali conditions will reduce the stability of emulsion, leading to decrease of the toluene removal. Based on the consideration of equipment corrosion problems and industrial application to water scrubbers process, the optimal pH range of PSW-5 was selected as 6.0–7.5, and the optimal pH value was selected as 7.5 in this study.Figure 4
The effect of initial pH on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


### 3.4. Effect of Temperature

Figure5 presents the effects of absorption temperature on the toluene absorption efficiency. It could be seen that the toluene absorption efficiency rapidly decreased with increasing the absorption temperature and then decreased slowly. This indicates that the PSW-5 is very sensitive to temperature, and the increase of absorption temperature is not conducive to the toluene removal. When the reaction temperatures were 25°C, 35°C, 45°C, 55°C, and 65°C, the average absorption efficiencies of toluene were 90.77%, 82.90%, 70.08%, 64.27%, and 61.22%, respectively. And from 25°C to 45°C the toluene absorption efficiency dropped more than 20 percentage points. This is because the solubility of toluene in PSW-5 decreases as the temperature is increased. Meanwhile, according to Henry’s law, when the temperature increases Henry’s constant will increase. So, when the toluene concentration in flow is stable, the toluene concentration in outlet gas will decrease. Therefore, when the absorption temperature increases the toluene absorption capacity of PSW decreases.Figure 5
The effect of temperature on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


### 3.5. Effect of Toluene Concentration

The effect of toluene concentration on absorption efficiencies of toluene is shown in Figure6. The results show that the toluene absorption efficiencies decreased slightly with the increase of toluene concentration, and all exceeded 80% where the inlet concentration of toluene varied from 500 mg·m−3 to 5200 mg·m−3. So the toluene absorption efficiency is slightly affected by toluene concentration. The gas phase driving force for mass transfer increases with increasing partial pressure of VOC in the inlet gas, so the absorption rate and the absorbed amount of toluene increase. Meanwhile, in this study the usage amount of paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion in the PSW-5 was excessive, so the toluene absorption efficiency was little changed relative to the changes of inlet toluene concentration. However, due to the fixed size of interfacial area between the gas and the liquid and a constant PSW concentration, whenever the concentration of toluene in the inlet gas is increased a limited amount of toluene in a fixed volume of absorbent is absorbed at a constant temperature. So, the PSW is an effective absorbent for removing VOCs from exhaust gas with a larger concentration range.Figure 6
The effect of toluene concentration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, and [PSW] = 5% (v/v).


### 3.6. Effect of Gas Flow Rate

Figure7 displays the effect of the gas flow rate on the absorption efficiency of toluene in the range from 0.5 to 3 L·min−1. Results show that the absorption efficiency of toluene is significantly affected by gas flow rate, and absorption efficiency of toluene reduces with increasing gas flow rate. When the gas flow rate varied from 0.5 to 3 L·min−1, the average absorption efficiencies of toluene were 96.60%, 90.77%, 76.98%, 69.94%, and 57.24%, respectively. The reason for such a decrease in absorption efficiency is the reduction of gas-liquid contact time. The gas-liquid contact time decreases with the increase of the gas flow rate and results in the fact that the toluene molecules in the gas cannot have necessary time to dissolve in the PSW-5. Therefore, higher amounts of toluene molecules leave the absorption reactor without absorption, and the absorption efficiency of toluene reduces with increasing gas flow rate. However, the absolute amount of the toluene absorbed by the PSW-5 increases with the increase of the gas flow rate at a constant temperature.Figure 7
The effect of gas flow rate on toluene absorption efficiency.Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


### 3.7. Effect of Species of VOCs

There are many species of VOCs emitted from industry. Major VOCs include aromatics, alkanes, ketones, and esters. There are different absorbing performances of absorbent on different VOCs at constant conditions in the actual production. So, in this study benzene, toluene, xylene, ethyl acetate, hexane, and acetone were chosen as representative of VOCs, absorbing performances of PSW-5 on them were observed, and the result is shown in Figure8.Figure 8
The absorbing performances of PSW on different VOCs.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), [acetone] = 1600 mg·m−3, [ethyl acetate] = 1570 mg·m−3, [xylene] = 1800 mg·m−3, [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3, [benzene] = 1500 mg·m−3, and [hexane] = 1550 mg·m−3.It can be seen from Figure8 that absorption capacity of PSW for six kinds of VOCs is acetone > ethyl acetate > xylene > toluene > benzene > hexane, with the average absorption efficiencies of 97.58%, 95.59%, 92.06%, 90.77%, 72.71%, and 25.14%, respectively. It suggests that the absorption efficiencies of ketones, esters, and aromatics are much higher than the absorption efficiencies of alkanes when PSW is used as the absorbent.The differences of absorbing performances depend on the physical and chemical properties of VOCs when the temperature and partial pressure of VOC are kept constant. Solubility and diffusivity of VOCs are major physical properties that affect the absorption of VOCs. Chemical properties, such as polarity of VOCs and liquids, and hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature of VOCs all can affect the absorption efficiency. The physical and chemical properties of six kinds of VOCs are listed in Table2, combined with the results of absorption experiments; the following conclusions can be got. (1)For different types of organic matter, the absorption efficiency generally increases with the increase of the molecular polarity and the decrease of logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient of VOCs. (2)For the same type of hydrophobic VOCs, such as benzene series, the larger saturated vapor pressure of VOCs, the lower absorption efficiency achieved, and the absorption efficiency generally increases with the increase of logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient of VOCs. (3) The absorption efficiencies of hydrophilic VOCs are better than that of hydrophobic VOCs. (4) Most hydrophobic and hydrophilic VOCs can be effectively removed by PSW.Table 2
Physical and chemical properties of common VOCs.
Compound Formula Molecular weight (g·mol−1) Relative density (g·cm−3) Boiling point (°C) Melting point (°C) Logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient Saturated vapor pressure (Kpa) Polarity Benzene C6H6 78.11 0.8765 80.1 5.5 2.15 26.66 (31.6°C) 3.0 Toluene C7H8 92.14 0.8636 110.6 −94.9 2.69 4.89 (30°C) 2.4 Xylene C8H10 106.16 0.880 144.4 −25 3.12 1.33 (32°C) 2.5 (p-xylene) Acetone C3H6O 58.08 0.797 56.48 −94.6 −0.24 37.69 (30°C) 5.4 Ethyl acetate C4H8O2 88.10 0.90 77.2 −83.6 0.73 13.33 (27°C) 4.3 Hexane C6H14 86.17 0.659 68.7 −95.6 3.9 17 (20°C) 0.06 Water H2O 18.02 1 100 0 — 2.34 (20°C) 10.20As Figure9 illustrates, when the inlet gas also contained benzene, toluene, and xylene, the average absorption efficiencies of xylene, toluene, and benzene were 90.99%, 86.81%, and 68.90%, respectively. Compared with single contaminant removal (Figure 8), the absorption efficiencies of three kinds of VOCs all declined in varying degrees. This is because there is competition between different organic molecules in the absorption process. However, the absolute amount of the VOCs transferred from gas into PSW-5 increases. The results also indicate that the VOCs absorption efficiency is slightly affected by composition of VOCs.Figure 9
The absorbing performances of PSW on multicomponent VOCs.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), [xylene] = 1800 mg·m−3, [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3, and [benzene] = 1500 mg·m−3.


### 3.8. Breakthrough Experiment

Figure10 shows the breakthrough curves of toluene under the experimental conditions. As demonstrated in Figure 10, the toluene concentration in outlet gas slowly increased with the increase of absorption time, and the equilibrium was reached after 34 h. According to the mass balance, toluene concentration in the liquid phase can be calculated by using integration method, and the value (Cl) is 1331 mg·L−1. Then, dimensionless Henry’s constant (H) could be calculated by (2) [27], Henry’s constant (H∗) and (H∗∗) could be calculated by (3) and (4), respectively [11], and the activity coefficient γ is defined by (5) [18], and the results are shown in Table 3.(2)HCl=Cg(3)H∗=HRT(4)H∗∗=H∗ctxt(5)γ=H∗∗Psat,where R and T are the constant of perfect gas and the absorption temperature, respectively, ct is the concentration of toluene, xt is the mole fraction of toluene, and Psat is the saturation pressure of the toluene.Table 3
Toluene solubility,Psat, Henry’s constant,and activity coefficientvalues at 25°C.
Solubility (g·L−1) P s a t (pa) H H ∗ (Pa·m3·mol−1) H ∗ ∗ (Kpa) γ PSW 1.331 82.46 0.0023 5.70 316.75 3841.26 Water 0.53 3803 0.2663 660.14 55561.32 14609.87Figure 10
The breakthrough curves of toluene.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 3100 mg·m−3.The value of Henry’s constant gives the composition of the liquid which would be in thermodynamic balance with the inlet gas.γ is characteristic of the interaction between toluene and the absorbent. Generally, the smaller the Henry’s constant and the activity coefficient value, the greater the solubility of VOCs. As exhibited in Table 3, Henry’s constant value of toluene in PSW-5 is more than 115 times lower than the value in water, since a Henry’s constant value of 316.75 kPa is obtained, which should be compared to that of water, 55561.32 kPa. Meanwhile, the activity coefficient value of toluene in PSW-5 and the saturation pressure of the toluene all are significantly lower than those of water. Finally the toluene solubility in the PSW-5 is more than 2.5 times higher than the value in water. The results suggest that the PSW is more suitable for application as an effective VOCs absorbent.


### 3.9. Regeneration Experiment

The disposal of VOCs saturated absorbents is an important issue in industry, and it is also an important factor in limiting the absorption method for industrial application. Fortunately, the used absorbent regeneration could perfectly solve the problem. Figure11 presents the variation of the absorption efficiencies of toluene with regeneration run. Results show that the absorption capacities of PSW-5 for toluene slightly decreased with increasing regeneration runs. After 3 runs of regeneration the absorption efficiency of PSW for toluene was 82.42%, less than the initial absorption efficiency (90.77%) of PSW-5. The decrease of the absorption efficiency is mainly ascribed to the evaporation of paraffin in the PSW because of heating. Consequently, present results show that the process can achieve the PSW reuse and organic recycling.Figure 11
The effect of regeneration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 3.1. Choice of Absorption Solution

In this study, several common solutions such as polyethylene glycol (5%, v/v), paraffin (5%, v/v), tween 80 (0.1%, w/v), DMSO (50%, v/v), and tap water were used to remove toluene and compared with the PSW-5 absorption. It is worth to note that serious foaming problem was caused when the concentration of tween 80 was more than 0.1% (w/v), so its concentration was 0.1% (w/v) in this experiment. Both absorption temperature (25°C) and toluene concentration (1650 mg·L−1) were stable. The results are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the toluene absorption efficiencies of six kinds of absorbents all decreased by time due to the gradual saturation of absorbents. As the absorption continued, the toluene concentration in the absorbent was raised, leading to the absorption efficiency decrease. As shown in Figure 2, the water had lowest absorption efficiency and shortest saturation time for hydrophobic and nonpolar toluene. So water is not a suitable absorbent for hydrophobic and nonpolar VOCs removal in industry. Compared with water, other absorbents all could promote the absorption of toluene. Toluene absorption capacity of six kinds of absorbents was PSW-5 > DMSO > paraffin > polyethylene glycol > tween 80 > water, with the average absorption efficiencies of 90.77%, 72.41%, 57.28%, 33.73%, 27.57%, and 10.77%, respectively. So, PSW appears clearly to be better absorbent than others as it has high capacity of toluene absorption; meanwhile, it has low production cost and high security. Therefore, PSW is a very attractive absorbent for controlling VOCs.Figure 2
The effect of absorbents on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 3.2. Effect of PSW Concentration

PSW concentration is an important effect factor to toluene absorption; it can be seen from Figure3 that the toluene absorption efficiencies increased with the increment of PSW concentration. A sharp increase in toluene absorption efficiency from 55.54% to 90.77% was observed when the concentration varied from 0.5% to 5% (v/v). This is because the increase of PSW concentration can increase the nonpolarity of absorption solution and cause higher absorption efficiency towards nonpolar VOCs.Figure 3
The effect of PSW concentration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.As listed in Table1, the values of surface tension and interfacial tension between toluene and PSW decrease with the increase of PSW concentration. So the higher concentration of PSW can effectively promote the toluene absorption and lead to a high absorption efficiency of toluene. When the PSW concentration continued to increase, the absorption efficiency was still increasing, but the rate of increase of toluene absorption efficiency became slow. For example, when the PSW concentration increased from 5% to 10% (v/v), toluene absorption efficiency increased only from 90.77% to about 97.58%. It is speculated that the constant of gas-liquid contact time is the main cause of this phenomenon. Considering the pollutant emission concentration, pollutant emission standard, PSW costs, and security, PSW concentration in this study was selected as 5% (v/v).Table 1
Surface tension and interfacial tension between toluene and PSW at 25°C.
Concentrations of PSW (v/v) 0.5% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 10.0% Surface tension (mN·m−1) 37.526 ± 0.030 37.126 ± 0.023 36.945 ± 0.024 36.651 ± 0.026 36.572 ± 0.027 36.489 ± 0.030 Interfacial tension (mN·m−1) 17.493 ± 0.014 16.541 ± 0.010 16.127 ± 0.015 15.299 ± 0.007 13.987 ± 0.011 13.684 ± 0.005


## 3.3. Effect of Initial pH of PSW

Organic waste gas emitted by certain industries contains acidic substances in actual production, or the water for preparation of solution is acidic or alkaline; these factors will lead to changes in the absorption solution pH, thereby affecting the VOCs absorption. In this study, the initial pH of PSW-5 was 7.5, and the pH was adjusted to the desired value by adding HCl or NaOH.As shown in Figure4, pH is one of important effect factors to toluene absorption. When the initial pH of PSW-5 changed from 4 to 6, toluene absorption efficiency sharply increased from 79.78% to 90.17%, then almost retained stable when solution pH varied from 6.0 to 7.5, and thereafter decreased with an increase of solution pH between 7.5 and 9.2. This is because the polarity of PSW-5 increases with the increase of initial pH in the alkaline solution and the decrease of initial pH in the acidic solution; meanwhile, strong acid or alkali conditions will reduce the stability of emulsion, leading to decrease of the toluene removal. Based on the consideration of equipment corrosion problems and industrial application to water scrubbers process, the optimal pH range of PSW-5 was selected as 6.0–7.5, and the optimal pH value was selected as 7.5 in this study.Figure 4
The effect of initial pH on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 3.4. Effect of Temperature

Figure5 presents the effects of absorption temperature on the toluene absorption efficiency. It could be seen that the toluene absorption efficiency rapidly decreased with increasing the absorption temperature and then decreased slowly. This indicates that the PSW-5 is very sensitive to temperature, and the increase of absorption temperature is not conducive to the toluene removal. When the reaction temperatures were 25°C, 35°C, 45°C, 55°C, and 65°C, the average absorption efficiencies of toluene were 90.77%, 82.90%, 70.08%, 64.27%, and 61.22%, respectively. And from 25°C to 45°C the toluene absorption efficiency dropped more than 20 percentage points. This is because the solubility of toluene in PSW-5 decreases as the temperature is increased. Meanwhile, according to Henry’s law, when the temperature increases Henry’s constant will increase. So, when the toluene concentration in flow is stable, the toluene concentration in outlet gas will decrease. Therefore, when the absorption temperature increases the toluene absorption capacity of PSW decreases.Figure 5
The effect of temperature on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 3.5. Effect of Toluene Concentration

The effect of toluene concentration on absorption efficiencies of toluene is shown in Figure6. The results show that the toluene absorption efficiencies decreased slightly with the increase of toluene concentration, and all exceeded 80% where the inlet concentration of toluene varied from 500 mg·m−3 to 5200 mg·m−3. So the toluene absorption efficiency is slightly affected by toluene concentration. The gas phase driving force for mass transfer increases with increasing partial pressure of VOC in the inlet gas, so the absorption rate and the absorbed amount of toluene increase. Meanwhile, in this study the usage amount of paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion in the PSW-5 was excessive, so the toluene absorption efficiency was little changed relative to the changes of inlet toluene concentration. However, due to the fixed size of interfacial area between the gas and the liquid and a constant PSW concentration, whenever the concentration of toluene in the inlet gas is increased a limited amount of toluene in a fixed volume of absorbent is absorbed at a constant temperature. So, the PSW is an effective absorbent for removing VOCs from exhaust gas with a larger concentration range.Figure 6
The effect of toluene concentration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, and [PSW] = 5% (v/v).


## 3.6. Effect of Gas Flow Rate

Figure7 displays the effect of the gas flow rate on the absorption efficiency of toluene in the range from 0.5 to 3 L·min−1. Results show that the absorption efficiency of toluene is significantly affected by gas flow rate, and absorption efficiency of toluene reduces with increasing gas flow rate. When the gas flow rate varied from 0.5 to 3 L·min−1, the average absorption efficiencies of toluene were 96.60%, 90.77%, 76.98%, 69.94%, and 57.24%, respectively. The reason for such a decrease in absorption efficiency is the reduction of gas-liquid contact time. The gas-liquid contact time decreases with the increase of the gas flow rate and results in the fact that the toluene molecules in the gas cannot have necessary time to dissolve in the PSW-5. Therefore, higher amounts of toluene molecules leave the absorption reactor without absorption, and the absorption efficiency of toluene reduces with increasing gas flow rate. However, the absolute amount of the toluene absorbed by the PSW-5 increases with the increase of the gas flow rate at a constant temperature.Figure 7
The effect of gas flow rate on toluene absorption efficiency.Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 3.7. Effect of Species of VOCs

There are many species of VOCs emitted from industry. Major VOCs include aromatics, alkanes, ketones, and esters. There are different absorbing performances of absorbent on different VOCs at constant conditions in the actual production. So, in this study benzene, toluene, xylene, ethyl acetate, hexane, and acetone were chosen as representative of VOCs, absorbing performances of PSW-5 on them were observed, and the result is shown in Figure8.Figure 8
The absorbing performances of PSW on different VOCs.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), [acetone] = 1600 mg·m−3, [ethyl acetate] = 1570 mg·m−3, [xylene] = 1800 mg·m−3, [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3, [benzene] = 1500 mg·m−3, and [hexane] = 1550 mg·m−3.It can be seen from Figure8 that absorption capacity of PSW for six kinds of VOCs is acetone > ethyl acetate > xylene > toluene > benzene > hexane, with the average absorption efficiencies of 97.58%, 95.59%, 92.06%, 90.77%, 72.71%, and 25.14%, respectively. It suggests that the absorption efficiencies of ketones, esters, and aromatics are much higher than the absorption efficiencies of alkanes when PSW is used as the absorbent.The differences of absorbing performances depend on the physical and chemical properties of VOCs when the temperature and partial pressure of VOC are kept constant. Solubility and diffusivity of VOCs are major physical properties that affect the absorption of VOCs. Chemical properties, such as polarity of VOCs and liquids, and hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature of VOCs all can affect the absorption efficiency. The physical and chemical properties of six kinds of VOCs are listed in Table2, combined with the results of absorption experiments; the following conclusions can be got. (1)For different types of organic matter, the absorption efficiency generally increases with the increase of the molecular polarity and the decrease of logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient of VOCs. (2)For the same type of hydrophobic VOCs, such as benzene series, the larger saturated vapor pressure of VOCs, the lower absorption efficiency achieved, and the absorption efficiency generally increases with the increase of logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient of VOCs. (3) The absorption efficiencies of hydrophilic VOCs are better than that of hydrophobic VOCs. (4) Most hydrophobic and hydrophilic VOCs can be effectively removed by PSW.Table 2
Physical and chemical properties of common VOCs.
Compound Formula Molecular weight (g·mol−1) Relative density (g·cm−3) Boiling point (°C) Melting point (°C) Logarithm of the octanol/water partition coefficient Saturated vapor pressure (Kpa) Polarity Benzene C6H6 78.11 0.8765 80.1 5.5 2.15 26.66 (31.6°C) 3.0 Toluene C7H8 92.14 0.8636 110.6 −94.9 2.69 4.89 (30°C) 2.4 Xylene C8H10 106.16 0.880 144.4 −25 3.12 1.33 (32°C) 2.5 (p-xylene) Acetone C3H6O 58.08 0.797 56.48 −94.6 −0.24 37.69 (30°C) 5.4 Ethyl acetate C4H8O2 88.10 0.90 77.2 −83.6 0.73 13.33 (27°C) 4.3 Hexane C6H14 86.17 0.659 68.7 −95.6 3.9 17 (20°C) 0.06 Water H2O 18.02 1 100 0 — 2.34 (20°C) 10.20As Figure9 illustrates, when the inlet gas also contained benzene, toluene, and xylene, the average absorption efficiencies of xylene, toluene, and benzene were 90.99%, 86.81%, and 68.90%, respectively. Compared with single contaminant removal (Figure 8), the absorption efficiencies of three kinds of VOCs all declined in varying degrees. This is because there is competition between different organic molecules in the absorption process. However, the absolute amount of the VOCs transferred from gas into PSW-5 increases. The results also indicate that the VOCs absorption efficiency is slightly affected by composition of VOCs.Figure 9
The absorbing performances of PSW on multicomponent VOCs.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), [xylene] = 1800 mg·m−3, [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3, and [benzene] = 1500 mg·m−3.


## 3.8. Breakthrough Experiment

Figure10 shows the breakthrough curves of toluene under the experimental conditions. As demonstrated in Figure 10, the toluene concentration in outlet gas slowly increased with the increase of absorption time, and the equilibrium was reached after 34 h. According to the mass balance, toluene concentration in the liquid phase can be calculated by using integration method, and the value (Cl) is 1331 mg·L−1. Then, dimensionless Henry’s constant (H) could be calculated by (2) [27], Henry’s constant (H∗) and (H∗∗) could be calculated by (3) and (4), respectively [11], and the activity coefficient γ is defined by (5) [18], and the results are shown in Table 3.(2)HCl=Cg(3)H∗=HRT(4)H∗∗=H∗ctxt(5)γ=H∗∗Psat,where R and T are the constant of perfect gas and the absorption temperature, respectively, ct is the concentration of toluene, xt is the mole fraction of toluene, and Psat is the saturation pressure of the toluene.Table 3
Toluene solubility,Psat, Henry’s constant,and activity coefficientvalues at 25°C.
Solubility (g·L−1) P s a t (pa) H H ∗ (Pa·m3·mol−1) H ∗ ∗ (Kpa) γ PSW 1.331 82.46 0.0023 5.70 316.75 3841.26 Water 0.53 3803 0.2663 660.14 55561.32 14609.87Figure 10
The breakthrough curves of toluene.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 3100 mg·m−3.The value of Henry’s constant gives the composition of the liquid which would be in thermodynamic balance with the inlet gas.γ is characteristic of the interaction between toluene and the absorbent. Generally, the smaller the Henry’s constant and the activity coefficient value, the greater the solubility of VOCs. As exhibited in Table 3, Henry’s constant value of toluene in PSW-5 is more than 115 times lower than the value in water, since a Henry’s constant value of 316.75 kPa is obtained, which should be compared to that of water, 55561.32 kPa. Meanwhile, the activity coefficient value of toluene in PSW-5 and the saturation pressure of the toluene all are significantly lower than those of water. Finally the toluene solubility in the PSW-5 is more than 2.5 times higher than the value in water. The results suggest that the PSW is more suitable for application as an effective VOCs absorbent.


## 3.9. Regeneration Experiment

The disposal of VOCs saturated absorbents is an important issue in industry, and it is also an important factor in limiting the absorption method for industrial application. Fortunately, the used absorbent regeneration could perfectly solve the problem. Figure11 presents the variation of the absorption efficiencies of toluene with regeneration run. Results show that the absorption capacities of PSW-5 for toluene slightly decreased with increasing regeneration runs. After 3 runs of regeneration the absorption efficiency of PSW for toluene was 82.42%, less than the initial absorption efficiency (90.77%) of PSW-5. The decrease of the absorption efficiency is mainly ascribed to the evaporation of paraffin in the PSW because of heating. Consequently, present results show that the process can achieve the PSW reuse and organic recycling.Figure 11
The effect of regeneration on toluene absorption efficiency.Qgas = 1 L·min−1, Tabsorption = 25°C, initial pH = 7.5, [PSW] = 5% (v/v), and [toluene] = 1650 mg·m−3.


## 4. Conclusions

In this study, a new paraffin/surfactant/water emulsion for VOCs controlling was developed, and an evaluation of the influence of different experimental parameters on toluene absorption efficiency was carried out. The following conclusions can be listed considering the experimental data obtained: for a given VOC and process conditions, PSW-5 provided higher absorption efficiency (90.77%) than the other absorbents used. Compared with water,Psat, H, and γ of toluene in PSW-5 are significantly lower than those in water, and toluene solubility in PSW-5 is more than 2.5 times higher than the value in water. Toluene absorption efficiency can be increased by increasing the concentration of PSW or lowering the absorption temperature and gas flow rate, and the absorption efficiency is slightly affected by inlet concentration of toluene. pH is one of the important factors affecting the toluene absorption, toluene absorption efficiency increases with the increment of initial pH at first and then dropping with the rise of solution pH, and the optimal pH value is 7.5. There are different absorbing performances of PSW on different VOCs at constant conditions, the absorption capacity of selected six kinds of VOCs is acetone > ethyl acetate > xylene > toluene > benzene > hexane, and most VOCs can be effectively removed by PSW. Regeneration and reuse of the PSW are possible; after 3 runs of regeneration the absorption efficiency of PSW-5 for toluene also can reach 82.42%. Absorptive removal of VOCs using the PSW can be a cost effective process for the industrial application.



---

*Source: 9385027-2016-12-08.xml*