# Ag(I) Catalyzed Grafting of Acrylonitrile onto Gum Arabic by Ce(IV) inH2SO4 Medium: A Kinetic Study

Authors: Geeta Thota; P. Srinivas
Journal: ISRN Physical Chemistry
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

Grafting of Acrylonitrile (AN) onto water-soluble polymer Gum arabic (GA) was carried out using ceric ammonium sulfate [Ce(IV)] as initiator in the presence and absence of Ag(I) in H2SO4 medium at 313 K. The rate of oxidation (Roxi), rate of grafting (Rg), and grafting efficiency (GE) were determined for catalyzed and uncatalyzed grafting and suitable mechanism was proposed to explain the observed results. No homopolymerization in the absence of GA indicates that the polymer obtained is purely a graft copolymer. A probable mechanism involving the formation of Ag(I)-GA adduct followed by its oxidation with Ce(IV) to give Ag(II)-GA adduct, and its decomposition to give initiating radicals is proposed to explain the observed results. The graft polymer was characterized using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) considering GA as reference.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The water-soluble polymers are of immense importance in industry [1]. Their use is limited due to their biodegradability. Chemical modification of conventional polymers can provide a potential route for significantly altering their physical and chemical properties. Such a modification can be made through graft copolymerization technique. Various initiators are used for grafting technique [2] and the graft copolymerization occurs through the abstraction of hydrogen atom from the backbone polymer containing a hydroxyl group or an amino group [3].The Ce(IV) is known to be one of the versatile water-soluble initiators for grafting of vinyl monomers onto natural and synthetic polymers. Graft polymerization of vinyl acetate onto starch [4], graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile onto cassava starch [5], synthesis of potato starch—g-polyacrylonitrile [6], grafting of acrylonitrile onto cellulose [7], grafting of acrylamide onto cellulose [8], graft copolymerization of acrylonitrile onto polyvinyl alcohol [9], kinetic study of grafting of acrylonitrile onto polyvinyl alcohol [10], synthesis of xanthum-g-vinyl formamide [11], graft copolymers of carboxymethylcellulose with acrylonitrile [12], vinyl pyrrolidone [13], acrylamide [14], and characterization [15], grafting of acrylonitrle onto sodium alginate [16], and synthesis of Agar/alginate-g-polyacrylonitrile [17] have been reported. In all these cases graft copolymers were formed along with homopolymer which is very difficult to separate. In view of this we thought it is worthwhile to search for effective initiator systems to prepare exclusive graft copolymers without contamination of homopolymer. We have carried out the grafting of acrylonitrile onto water-soluble polymer GA with Ce(IV) in presence and absence of Ag(I) in order to get exclusively pure graft copolymers with greater efficiency and without contamination of homopolymer.


## 2. Experimental Section

### 2.1. Materials

All the chemicals used were of the BDH AR grade. The monomer acrylonitrile was purified by distilling at low pressure under N2 atmosphere after washing with 5% NaOH, 3% H3PO4, and water. Gum arabic (Merck) was used after purification. Ceric ammonium sulfate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, and silver nitrate (Aldrich) were used without further purification.


### 2.2. Synthesis of GA-g-Acrylonitrile

The grafting reactions were conducted in dark under N2 atmosphere to prevent any photochemical reaction and to avoid inhibition by atmospheric oxygen. 100 mL of stock solution of 1% GA was prepared in distilled water. A calculated amount of AN, Ag(I) (in catalyzed grafting) was added to a 25 mL flask thermostated at 40± °C containing polymer solution. After sometime definite amount of Ce(IV) is added and this was assumed as zero time. The reaction was terminated by addition of calculated amount of ferrous ammonium sulfate at appropriate time. The precipitate of copolymer was isolated by filtration and dried in vacuum maintained at 50°C for 48 hrs. Time-average kinetics were followed and assumed as steady-state kinetics. The rate of grafting (Rg), rate of oxidation (Roxi), and grafting efficiency were calculated as follows:(1)Rg=-d[monomer]dt=1000×W1V2×t×M,Roxi=-d[Ce(IV)]dt=V2×ct,%GE=W1-W2W3×100
W1, W2, and W3 are weights of copolymer, polymer, and monomer, respectively. V1 and V2 are the volumes of reaction mixture and Ce(IV), respectively, while “M” is the molecular weight of monomer, “t” is the reaction time, and “c” is the concentration of Ce(IV) solution.In the oxidation reactions, the concentration of the total Ce(IV) in the reaction mixtures was estimated volumetrically by ferrous ammonium sulfate, using ferrous o-phenanthroline (ferroin) as an indicator.Infrared spectra were recorded in the form of KBr pellets in the wave number range 4000–400 cm−1 using JASCO IR 5300 spectrometer.The powder X-ray diffractograms were recorded on Siemens D-5000 powder X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation of wavelength 1.5406°A.SEM images were recorded on the HITACHI SU 1500 variable pressure scanning electron microscope (VP-SEM).DSC of powder samples was carried out on Mettler Toledo DSC-851e model in nitrogen atmosphere in the temperature region 35–500°C at the rate of  °C min−1.


## 2.1. Materials

All the chemicals used were of the BDH AR grade. The monomer acrylonitrile was purified by distilling at low pressure under N2 atmosphere after washing with 5% NaOH, 3% H3PO4, and water. Gum arabic (Merck) was used after purification. Ceric ammonium sulfate, ferrous ammonium sulfate, and silver nitrate (Aldrich) were used without further purification.


## 2.2. Synthesis of GA-g-Acrylonitrile

The grafting reactions were conducted in dark under N2 atmosphere to prevent any photochemical reaction and to avoid inhibition by atmospheric oxygen. 100 mL of stock solution of 1% GA was prepared in distilled water. A calculated amount of AN, Ag(I) (in catalyzed grafting) was added to a 25 mL flask thermostated at 40± °C containing polymer solution. After sometime definite amount of Ce(IV) is added and this was assumed as zero time. The reaction was terminated by addition of calculated amount of ferrous ammonium sulfate at appropriate time. The precipitate of copolymer was isolated by filtration and dried in vacuum maintained at 50°C for 48 hrs. Time-average kinetics were followed and assumed as steady-state kinetics. The rate of grafting (Rg), rate of oxidation (Roxi), and grafting efficiency were calculated as follows:(1)Rg=-d[monomer]dt=1000×W1V2×t×M,Roxi=-d[Ce(IV)]dt=V2×ct,%GE=W1-W2W3×100
W1, W2, and W3 are weights of copolymer, polymer, and monomer, respectively. V1 and V2 are the volumes of reaction mixture and Ce(IV), respectively, while “M” is the molecular weight of monomer, “t” is the reaction time, and “c” is the concentration of Ce(IV) solution.In the oxidation reactions, the concentration of the total Ce(IV) in the reaction mixtures was estimated volumetrically by ferrous ammonium sulfate, using ferrous o-phenanthroline (ferroin) as an indicator.Infrared spectra were recorded in the form of KBr pellets in the wave number range 4000–400 cm−1 using JASCO IR 5300 spectrometer.The powder X-ray diffractograms were recorded on Siemens D-5000 powder X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation of wavelength 1.5406°A.SEM images were recorded on the HITACHI SU 1500 variable pressure scanning electron microscope (VP-SEM).DSC of powder samples was carried out on Mettler Toledo DSC-851e model in nitrogen atmosphere in the temperature region 35–500°C at the rate of  °C min−1.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Rate of Ce(IV) Disappearance

Oxidation of GA was carried out with Ce(IV) in the presence and absence of Ag(I) at 313 K in H2SO4 medium. The rate of oxidation of GA by Ce(IV) was determined in the presence and absence of Ag(I) and the orders in [GA] were found to be 0.69 and 0.90, respectively (Figure 1). The orders in Ce(IV) were found to be unity in the presence and absence of [Ag(I)]. The rate of oxidation was studied by varying [Ag(I)] in the range of 5 × 10−2 to 25 × 10−2 M and the order in Ag(I) was 0.80 (Figure 1). The increase in Roxi with an increase in Ag(I) is due to the formation of Ag(I)-GA polymer adduct and which is oxidized by Ce(IV) to form radicals at a faster rate in comparison to the rate in absence of Ag(I).(a) Effect of [GA] on rate of oxidation. Plot of 4 +logRoxiversus 2 + log[GA]. [Ag(I)]=1.00×10-2 M, [Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, and Temp = 313°K. (b) Effect of [Ag(I)] on rate of oxidation. Plot of 4 + logRoxi versus 2 + log[Ag(I)]. [GA] =10×10-2%(w/v), [Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, and Temp = 313 K.
(a)(b)The mechanism for oxidation of GA by Ce(IV) in the absence and presence of Ag(I) proposed is as follows:Mechanism of Oxidation in Absence of Ag [I]:
(2)Ce(IV)+GA⟶kGA*+Ce(III)+H⊕GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products
The rate law is given as
(3)d[Ce(IV)]dt=k[Ce(IV)][GA].Mechanism of Oxidation in the Presence of Ag(I):
(4)GA+Ag(I)⟷KAg(I)-adductAg(I)-adduct+Ce(IV)⟶k1Ag(II)-adduct+Ce(III)Ag(II)-adduct⟶k2GA*+Ag(I)+H⊕GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products
The rate law is given as(5)d[Ce(IV)]dt=k1K[GA][Ag(I)][Ce(IV)]{1+K[GA]+K[Ag(I)]}.
The oxidation rates for different systems observed under the identical experimental conditions are given in Table 1.
These observations from Table1 suggest the following.(1)
The rate of oxidation of GA is found to be more in the presence of Ag(I).(2)
The rate of oxidation of acrylonitrile is comparatively less but no homopolymer of acrylonitrile is formed either in the presence or absence of Ag(I) with Ce(IV) in reaction conditions.(3)
In the presence of Ag(I), the rate of oxidation of acrylonitrile-GA is slightly higher butRg was significantly higher.
The observations indicate that the polymer obtained under experimental conditions is purely a graft copolymer. Ag(I) exclusively catalyzes the graft copolymerization.Table 1
Comparison of rate of oxidation and rate of grafting.
SystemRoxi×103Rg×105GA + Ce(IV)5.00—GA + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)5.50—AN + Ce(IV)4.50NilAN + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)5.25NilGA + AN + Ce(IV)5.505.80GA + AN + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)6.0010.5[Ag(I)]=1.00×10-2 M, [Ce(IV)]=5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4]=0.1 M,[AN]=4.00×10-2 M, [GA]=10×10-2%(w/v), Temp = 313 K.


### 3.2. Rate of Monomer Disappearance in the Absence of Ag(I)

Grafting of AN onto GA was carried by Ce(IV) at 313 K in H2SO4 medium. In the absence of GA, polymerization was negligible under otherwise similar experimental conditions. In the presence of GA however the polymerization was noticed without any induction period indicating that the polymer obtained is purely a graft copolymer without any contamination of homopolymer.


#### 3.2.1. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

Rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency decreased with the increase in [Ce(IV)] (Table2). The decrease in Rg is due to participation of Ce(IV) in initiation and termination steps.Table 2
Effect of [Ce(IV)], [AN] onRg and Grafting Efficiency (GE) in presence and absence of Ag(I). [H2SO4] = 0.1 M, Temp = 313 K.
[Ce(IV)] × 103[Ag(I)] × 102[GA] × 102 (w/v)[AN] × 102Rg × 105GE5.001.001.000.327.3021.85.001.001.000.4010.522.55.001.001.000.4812.625.05.001.001.000.5615.726.75.001.001.000.6419.929.65.001.001.000.4010.525.37.501.001.000.4015.737.510.01.001.000.4013.131.312.51.001.000.409.4222.75.000.001.000.322.627.805.000.001.000.405.0312.05.000.001.000.487.7515.45.000.001.000.5610.217.45.000.001.000.6413.319.85.000.001.000.405.8714.07.500.001.000.409.9624.010.00.001.000.407.6518.212.50.001.000.405.8714.0


#### 3.2.2. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization increased significantly with the increase in [AN] and the order in [AN] was found to be 2.0 in the concentration range of 0.32 × 10−2– 0.64 × 10-2M (Table 2).The increase in Rg with the increase in [AN] could be due to the availability of more amount of monomer to grafting sites. It is evident that order in [monomer] of 1.00–2.00 can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer.


#### 3.2.3. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency was increased (Table2), and the order in [GA] was 1.0 (Figure 2). The unity order in [reductant] can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer radicals.(a) Effect of [GA] on rate of grafting (Rg). Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] in presence and absence of Ag(I).  [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [Ag(I)] =1.00×10-2 M. (b) Effect of [Ag(I)] on Rate of grafting (Rg), Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[Ag(I)]. [GA] =10×10-2%(w/v), [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K,  [H2SO4] =0.1M, [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M.
(a)(b)


### 3.3. Rate of Monomer Disappearance in the Presence of Ag(I)

Grafting of AN onto GA was carried in the presence of Ag(I) by Ce(IV) in H2SO4 medium at 313 K under identical conditions as above. The grafting efficiency and Rg were high in the presence of Ag(I) compared to that in the Ag(I) absence.


#### 3.3.1. Effect of [Ag(I)] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased significantly with the increase in [Ag(I)] in the range of 5.0 × 10−2–25.0 × 10−2. The order in Ag(I) was found to be 0.50 as evident from the slope of plot 5 + logRg  versus 2 + log[Ag(I)] (Figure 2). The catalytic activity of Ag(I) is probably due to the facile reaction path through the intermediacy of a new redox system formed by added Ag(I). Ag(I) is known to form colorless adducts with oxygen-containing compounds like alcohols, acids, and so forth. In the present case, Ag(I) may form an adduct with polymers like GA in the initial step followed by its oxidation with Ce(IV) to form an Ag(II) adduct which subsequently undergoes internal oxidation to provide grafting sites at a faster rate when compared to polymer alone. Thus, the increase in the rate of graft copolymerization with Ag(I) is due to the production of more numbers of initiating radicals. It is also possible that the Ag(II) intermediate can directly initiate the reaction, since it is known to be a more powerful oxidizing agent. Similar observations that were also made in Ce(IV)-isopropyl alcohol redox system initiated polymerization of acrylonitrile in the presence of Ag(I) [18].


#### 3.3.2. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

In the presence of Ag(I),Rg and grafting efficiency were determined for the concentration range of 2.5 × 10−3–12.5 × 10−3 M (Table 2). An induction period was noticed and this period decreased with the increase in the concentration of Ce(IV). The grafting efficiency and rate of grafting were higher in the presence of catalyst. The decrease in Rg with the increase in [Ce(IV)] was explained by assuming the participation of Ce(IV) in the termination step.


#### 3.3.3. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased with the increase in [AN] in the presence of Ag(I) (Table2) and the order in [AN] was 1.44. It is well known that order in [monomer] can be explained either by linear or mixed terminations of polymer-grafted chains.


#### 3.3.4. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency increased (Table2). The order in [GA] in the presence of Ag(I) was found to be 0.70 as evident from the plot 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] (Figure 2). The deviation from unit order is due to the complexation of polymer with Ag(I).The order thus leads to linear termination of grafted polymer chains.From the above results and discussion, it is concluded that the grafting is initiated by the primary radicals as well as the Ag(II) adduct and the termination by Ce(IV) is linear.


#### 3.3.5. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in the Absence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(6)Ce(IV)+GA⟶krGA*+Ce(III)+H⊕
Reaction of primary radicals with Ce(IV) to give products:(7)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products+Ce(III)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(8)GA*+M⟶kiGA-M
Propagation:(9)GA-M+M⟶kpGA-M2GA-M(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-Mn
Termination by Ce(IV):(10)GA-Mn+Ce(IV)⟶ktPolymer+Ce(III).
Applying steady-state principle, the rate law derived is:(11)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkikr[GA][M]2kt{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}.


#### 3.3.6. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in Presence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(12)GA+Ag(I)⟷KAg(II)-adductAg(I)-adduct+Ce(IV)⟷k1Ag(II)-adduct+Ce(III)Ag(II)-adduct⟷k2GA*+Ag(I)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(13)GA*+M⟷kiGA-M*
Propagation:(14)GA-M*+M⟶kpGA-M2*GA-M*(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-M*n
Termination by Ce(IV):(15)GA-M*n+Ce(IV)⟶ktGA-Mn+Ce(III)+H⊕Consumption of GA* by Ce(IV)(16)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0Products
Applying steady state principle, the rate law derived is(17)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkik0[GA][M]2[Ag(I)]ki{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}+{K[Ag(I)]+K[GA]}.


### 3.4. Characterization of Gum Arabic-g-Acrylonitrile

#### 3.4.1. IR Spectra

IR spectra of GA show typical absorption of polysaccharide,vmax 3419 cm−1 (stretching of–OH group), and vmax 2931 cm−1(C–H of stretching), vmax 1654 cm−1, and the absorption at vmax 2249 cm−1 is –CN group of AN. Hence, the spectral data supports the grafting of AN onto GA.


#### 3.4.2. SEM

The surface topography of the GA-g-acrylonitrile was studied by SEM and compared with the GA. The extreme surface of the graft polymer appears porous and different from that of the polymer GA. This evidence supports grafting of acrylonitrile onto GA (Figure3).SEM images of (1) GA and (2) GA-g-acrylonitrile.
(a)(b)


#### 3.4.3. XRD Spectra

XRD of GA (Figure4) shows crystallinity in the region of 15–35°, while the graft polymer shows amorphous nature confirming the grafting of acrylonitrile onto backbone of GA.XRD.
(a)
GA(b)
GA-g-acrylonitrile


#### 3.4.4. DSC Spectra

DSC curve of GA (Figure5) showed two endothermic transitions at about 322°C and 419°C. The thermogram of graft copolymer has new endothermic transitions at 252°C and 464°C and this may be due to the enhanced interaction between backbone polymer and the acrylonitrile. These results confirm the grafting of monomer onto polymer.DSC.
(a)(b)


## 3.1. Rate of Ce(IV) Disappearance

Oxidation of GA was carried out with Ce(IV) in the presence and absence of Ag(I) at 313 K in H2SO4 medium. The rate of oxidation of GA by Ce(IV) was determined in the presence and absence of Ag(I) and the orders in [GA] were found to be 0.69 and 0.90, respectively (Figure 1). The orders in Ce(IV) were found to be unity in the presence and absence of [Ag(I)]. The rate of oxidation was studied by varying [Ag(I)] in the range of 5 × 10−2 to 25 × 10−2 M and the order in Ag(I) was 0.80 (Figure 1). The increase in Roxi with an increase in Ag(I) is due to the formation of Ag(I)-GA polymer adduct and which is oxidized by Ce(IV) to form radicals at a faster rate in comparison to the rate in absence of Ag(I).(a) Effect of [GA] on rate of oxidation. Plot of 4 +logRoxiversus 2 + log[GA]. [Ag(I)]=1.00×10-2 M, [Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, and Temp = 313°K. (b) Effect of [Ag(I)] on rate of oxidation. Plot of 4 + logRoxi versus 2 + log[Ag(I)]. [GA] =10×10-2%(w/v), [Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, and Temp = 313 K.
(a)(b)The mechanism for oxidation of GA by Ce(IV) in the absence and presence of Ag(I) proposed is as follows:Mechanism of Oxidation in Absence of Ag [I]:
(2)Ce(IV)+GA⟶kGA*+Ce(III)+H⊕GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products
The rate law is given as
(3)d[Ce(IV)]dt=k[Ce(IV)][GA].Mechanism of Oxidation in the Presence of Ag(I):
(4)GA+Ag(I)⟷KAg(I)-adductAg(I)-adduct+Ce(IV)⟶k1Ag(II)-adduct+Ce(III)Ag(II)-adduct⟶k2GA*+Ag(I)+H⊕GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products
The rate law is given as(5)d[Ce(IV)]dt=k1K[GA][Ag(I)][Ce(IV)]{1+K[GA]+K[Ag(I)]}.
The oxidation rates for different systems observed under the identical experimental conditions are given in Table 1.
These observations from Table1 suggest the following.(1)
The rate of oxidation of GA is found to be more in the presence of Ag(I).(2)
The rate of oxidation of acrylonitrile is comparatively less but no homopolymer of acrylonitrile is formed either in the presence or absence of Ag(I) with Ce(IV) in reaction conditions.(3)
In the presence of Ag(I), the rate of oxidation of acrylonitrile-GA is slightly higher butRg was significantly higher.
The observations indicate that the polymer obtained under experimental conditions is purely a graft copolymer. Ag(I) exclusively catalyzes the graft copolymerization.Table 1
Comparison of rate of oxidation and rate of grafting.
SystemRoxi×103Rg×105GA + Ce(IV)5.00—GA + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)5.50—AN + Ce(IV)4.50NilAN + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)5.25NilGA + AN + Ce(IV)5.505.80GA + AN + Ce(IV) + Ag(I)6.0010.5[Ag(I)]=1.00×10-2 M, [Ce(IV)]=5.00×10-3 M, [H2SO4]=0.1 M,[AN]=4.00×10-2 M, [GA]=10×10-2%(w/v), Temp = 313 K.


## 3.2. Rate of Monomer Disappearance in the Absence of Ag(I)

Grafting of AN onto GA was carried by Ce(IV) at 313 K in H2SO4 medium. In the absence of GA, polymerization was negligible under otherwise similar experimental conditions. In the presence of GA however the polymerization was noticed without any induction period indicating that the polymer obtained is purely a graft copolymer without any contamination of homopolymer.


### 3.2.1. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

Rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency decreased with the increase in [Ce(IV)] (Table2). The decrease in Rg is due to participation of Ce(IV) in initiation and termination steps.Table 2
Effect of [Ce(IV)], [AN] onRg and Grafting Efficiency (GE) in presence and absence of Ag(I). [H2SO4] = 0.1 M, Temp = 313 K.
[Ce(IV)] × 103[Ag(I)] × 102[GA] × 102 (w/v)[AN] × 102Rg × 105GE5.001.001.000.327.3021.85.001.001.000.4010.522.55.001.001.000.4812.625.05.001.001.000.5615.726.75.001.001.000.6419.929.65.001.001.000.4010.525.37.501.001.000.4015.737.510.01.001.000.4013.131.312.51.001.000.409.4222.75.000.001.000.322.627.805.000.001.000.405.0312.05.000.001.000.487.7515.45.000.001.000.5610.217.45.000.001.000.6413.319.85.000.001.000.405.8714.07.500.001.000.409.9624.010.00.001.000.407.6518.212.50.001.000.405.8714.0


### 3.2.2. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization increased significantly with the increase in [AN] and the order in [AN] was found to be 2.0 in the concentration range of 0.32 × 10−2– 0.64 × 10-2M (Table 2).The increase in Rg with the increase in [AN] could be due to the availability of more amount of monomer to grafting sites. It is evident that order in [monomer] of 1.00–2.00 can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer.


### 3.2.3. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency was increased (Table2), and the order in [GA] was 1.0 (Figure 2). The unity order in [reductant] can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer radicals.(a) Effect of [GA] on rate of grafting (Rg). Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] in presence and absence of Ag(I).  [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [Ag(I)] =1.00×10-2 M. (b) Effect of [Ag(I)] on Rate of grafting (Rg), Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[Ag(I)]. [GA] =10×10-2%(w/v), [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K,  [H2SO4] =0.1M, [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M.
(a)(b)


## 3.2.1. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

Rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency decreased with the increase in [Ce(IV)] (Table2). The decrease in Rg is due to participation of Ce(IV) in initiation and termination steps.Table 2
Effect of [Ce(IV)], [AN] onRg and Grafting Efficiency (GE) in presence and absence of Ag(I). [H2SO4] = 0.1 M, Temp = 313 K.
[Ce(IV)] × 103[Ag(I)] × 102[GA] × 102 (w/v)[AN] × 102Rg × 105GE5.001.001.000.327.3021.85.001.001.000.4010.522.55.001.001.000.4812.625.05.001.001.000.5615.726.75.001.001.000.6419.929.65.001.001.000.4010.525.37.501.001.000.4015.737.510.01.001.000.4013.131.312.51.001.000.409.4222.75.000.001.000.322.627.805.000.001.000.405.0312.05.000.001.000.487.7515.45.000.001.000.5610.217.45.000.001.000.6413.319.85.000.001.000.405.8714.07.500.001.000.409.9624.010.00.001.000.407.6518.212.50.001.000.405.8714.0


## 3.2.2. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization increased significantly with the increase in [AN] and the order in [AN] was found to be 2.0 in the concentration range of 0.32 × 10−2– 0.64 × 10-2M (Table 2).The increase in Rg with the increase in [AN] could be due to the availability of more amount of monomer to grafting sites. It is evident that order in [monomer] of 1.00–2.00 can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer.


## 3.2.3. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency was increased (Table2), and the order in [GA] was 1.0 (Figure 2). The unity order in [reductant] can be explained by linear termination of grafted polymer radicals.(a) Effect of [GA] on rate of grafting (Rg). Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] in presence and absence of Ag(I).  [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M, [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K, [H2SO4] =0.1 M, [Ag(I)] =1.00×10-2 M. (b) Effect of [Ag(I)] on Rate of grafting (Rg), Plot of 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[Ag(I)]. [GA] =10×10-2%(w/v), [AN] =4.00×10-2 M, Temp = 313°K,  [H2SO4] =0.1M, [(Ce(IV)] =5.00×10-3 M.
(a)(b)


## 3.3. Rate of Monomer Disappearance in the Presence of Ag(I)

Grafting of AN onto GA was carried in the presence of Ag(I) by Ce(IV) in H2SO4 medium at 313 K under identical conditions as above. The grafting efficiency and Rg were high in the presence of Ag(I) compared to that in the Ag(I) absence.


### 3.3.1. Effect of [Ag(I)] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased significantly with the increase in [Ag(I)] in the range of 5.0 × 10−2–25.0 × 10−2. The order in Ag(I) was found to be 0.50 as evident from the slope of plot 5 + logRg  versus 2 + log[Ag(I)] (Figure 2). The catalytic activity of Ag(I) is probably due to the facile reaction path through the intermediacy of a new redox system formed by added Ag(I). Ag(I) is known to form colorless adducts with oxygen-containing compounds like alcohols, acids, and so forth. In the present case, Ag(I) may form an adduct with polymers like GA in the initial step followed by its oxidation with Ce(IV) to form an Ag(II) adduct which subsequently undergoes internal oxidation to provide grafting sites at a faster rate when compared to polymer alone. Thus, the increase in the rate of graft copolymerization with Ag(I) is due to the production of more numbers of initiating radicals. It is also possible that the Ag(II) intermediate can directly initiate the reaction, since it is known to be a more powerful oxidizing agent. Similar observations that were also made in Ce(IV)-isopropyl alcohol redox system initiated polymerization of acrylonitrile in the presence of Ag(I) [18].


### 3.3.2. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

In the presence of Ag(I),Rg and grafting efficiency were determined for the concentration range of 2.5 × 10−3–12.5 × 10−3 M (Table 2). An induction period was noticed and this period decreased with the increase in the concentration of Ce(IV). The grafting efficiency and rate of grafting were higher in the presence of catalyst. The decrease in Rg with the increase in [Ce(IV)] was explained by assuming the participation of Ce(IV) in the termination step.


### 3.3.3. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased with the increase in [AN] in the presence of Ag(I) (Table2) and the order in [AN] was 1.44. It is well known that order in [monomer] can be explained either by linear or mixed terminations of polymer-grafted chains.


### 3.3.4. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency increased (Table2). The order in [GA] in the presence of Ag(I) was found to be 0.70 as evident from the plot 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] (Figure 2). The deviation from unit order is due to the complexation of polymer with Ag(I).The order thus leads to linear termination of grafted polymer chains.From the above results and discussion, it is concluded that the grafting is initiated by the primary radicals as well as the Ag(II) adduct and the termination by Ce(IV) is linear.


### 3.3.5. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in the Absence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(6)Ce(IV)+GA⟶krGA*+Ce(III)+H⊕
Reaction of primary radicals with Ce(IV) to give products:(7)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products+Ce(III)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(8)GA*+M⟶kiGA-M
Propagation:(9)GA-M+M⟶kpGA-M2GA-M(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-Mn
Termination by Ce(IV):(10)GA-Mn+Ce(IV)⟶ktPolymer+Ce(III).
Applying steady-state principle, the rate law derived is:(11)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkikr[GA][M]2kt{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}.


### 3.3.6. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in Presence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(12)GA+Ag(I)⟷KAg(II)-adductAg(I)-adduct+Ce(IV)⟷k1Ag(II)-adduct+Ce(III)Ag(II)-adduct⟷k2GA*+Ag(I)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(13)GA*+M⟷kiGA-M*
Propagation:(14)GA-M*+M⟶kpGA-M2*GA-M*(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-M*n
Termination by Ce(IV):(15)GA-M*n+Ce(IV)⟶ktGA-Mn+Ce(III)+H⊕Consumption of GA* by Ce(IV)(16)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0Products
Applying steady state principle, the rate law derived is(17)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkik0[GA][M]2[Ag(I)]ki{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}+{K[Ag(I)]+K[GA]}.


## 3.3.1. Effect of [Ag(I)] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased significantly with the increase in [Ag(I)] in the range of 5.0 × 10−2–25.0 × 10−2. The order in Ag(I) was found to be 0.50 as evident from the slope of plot 5 + logRg  versus 2 + log[Ag(I)] (Figure 2). The catalytic activity of Ag(I) is probably due to the facile reaction path through the intermediacy of a new redox system formed by added Ag(I). Ag(I) is known to form colorless adducts with oxygen-containing compounds like alcohols, acids, and so forth. In the present case, Ag(I) may form an adduct with polymers like GA in the initial step followed by its oxidation with Ce(IV) to form an Ag(II) adduct which subsequently undergoes internal oxidation to provide grafting sites at a faster rate when compared to polymer alone. Thus, the increase in the rate of graft copolymerization with Ag(I) is due to the production of more numbers of initiating radicals. It is also possible that the Ag(II) intermediate can directly initiate the reaction, since it is known to be a more powerful oxidizing agent. Similar observations that were also made in Ce(IV)-isopropyl alcohol redox system initiated polymerization of acrylonitrile in the presence of Ag(I) [18].


## 3.3.2. Effect of [Ce(IV)] on Grafting

In the presence of Ag(I),Rg and grafting efficiency were determined for the concentration range of 2.5 × 10−3–12.5 × 10−3 M (Table 2). An induction period was noticed and this period decreased with the increase in the concentration of Ce(IV). The grafting efficiency and rate of grafting were higher in the presence of catalyst. The decrease in Rg with the increase in [Ce(IV)] was explained by assuming the participation of Ce(IV) in the termination step.


## 3.3.3. Effect of [AN] on Grafting

The rate of graft copolymerization and grafting efficiency increased with the increase in [AN] in the presence of Ag(I) (Table2) and the order in [AN] was 1.44. It is well known that order in [monomer] can be explained either by linear or mixed terminations of polymer-grafted chains.


## 3.3.4. Effect of [GA] on Grafting

Increasing the percentage of polymer (w/v), the rate of grafting as well as grafting efficiency increased (Table2). The order in [GA] in the presence of Ag(I) was found to be 0.70 as evident from the plot 5 + logRg versus 2 + log[GA] (Figure 2). The deviation from unit order is due to the complexation of polymer with Ag(I).The order thus leads to linear termination of grafted polymer chains.From the above results and discussion, it is concluded that the grafting is initiated by the primary radicals as well as the Ag(II) adduct and the termination by Ce(IV) is linear.


## 3.3.5. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in the Absence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(6)Ce(IV)+GA⟶krGA*+Ce(III)+H⊕
Reaction of primary radicals with Ce(IV) to give products:(7)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0products+Ce(III)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(8)GA*+M⟶kiGA-M
Propagation:(9)GA-M+M⟶kpGA-M2GA-M(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-Mn
Termination by Ce(IV):(10)GA-Mn+Ce(IV)⟶ktPolymer+Ce(III).
Applying steady-state principle, the rate law derived is:(11)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkikr[GA][M]2kt{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}.


## 3.3.6. Mechanism of Graft Copolymerization in Presence of Ag(I)

Production of initiating species:(12)GA+Ag(I)⟷KAg(II)-adductAg(I)-adduct+Ce(IV)⟷k1Ag(II)-adduct+Ce(III)Ag(II)-adduct⟷k2GA*+Ag(I)+H⊕
Initiation of graft copolymerization by GA*:(13)GA*+M⟷kiGA-M*
Propagation:(14)GA-M*+M⟶kpGA-M2*GA-M*(n-1)+M⟶kpGA-M*n
Termination by Ce(IV):(15)GA-M*n+Ce(IV)⟶ktGA-Mn+Ce(III)+H⊕Consumption of GA* by Ce(IV)(16)GA*+Ce(IV)⟶k0Products
Applying steady state principle, the rate law derived is(17)Rg=-d[M]dt=kpkik0[GA][M]2[Ag(I)]ki{k0[Ce(IV)]+ki[M]}+{K[Ag(I)]+K[GA]}.


## 3.4. Characterization of Gum Arabic-g-Acrylonitrile

### 3.4.1. IR Spectra

IR spectra of GA show typical absorption of polysaccharide,vmax 3419 cm−1 (stretching of–OH group), and vmax 2931 cm−1(C–H of stretching), vmax 1654 cm−1, and the absorption at vmax 2249 cm−1 is –CN group of AN. Hence, the spectral data supports the grafting of AN onto GA.


### 3.4.2. SEM

The surface topography of the GA-g-acrylonitrile was studied by SEM and compared with the GA. The extreme surface of the graft polymer appears porous and different from that of the polymer GA. This evidence supports grafting of acrylonitrile onto GA (Figure3).SEM images of (1) GA and (2) GA-g-acrylonitrile.
(a)(b)


### 3.4.3. XRD Spectra

XRD of GA (Figure4) shows crystallinity in the region of 15–35°, while the graft polymer shows amorphous nature confirming the grafting of acrylonitrile onto backbone of GA.XRD.
(a)
GA(b)
GA-g-acrylonitrile


### 3.4.4. DSC Spectra

DSC curve of GA (Figure5) showed two endothermic transitions at about 322°C and 419°C. The thermogram of graft copolymer has new endothermic transitions at 252°C and 464°C and this may be due to the enhanced interaction between backbone polymer and the acrylonitrile. These results confirm the grafting of monomer onto polymer.DSC.
(a)(b)


## 3.4.1. IR Spectra

IR spectra of GA show typical absorption of polysaccharide,vmax 3419 cm−1 (stretching of–OH group), and vmax 2931 cm−1(C–H of stretching), vmax 1654 cm−1, and the absorption at vmax 2249 cm−1 is –CN group of AN. Hence, the spectral data supports the grafting of AN onto GA.


## 3.4.2. SEM

The surface topography of the GA-g-acrylonitrile was studied by SEM and compared with the GA. The extreme surface of the graft polymer appears porous and different from that of the polymer GA. This evidence supports grafting of acrylonitrile onto GA (Figure3).SEM images of (1) GA and (2) GA-g-acrylonitrile.
(a)(b)


## 3.4.3. XRD Spectra

XRD of GA (Figure4) shows crystallinity in the region of 15–35°, while the graft polymer shows amorphous nature confirming the grafting of acrylonitrile onto backbone of GA.XRD.
(a)
GA(b)
GA-g-acrylonitrile


## 3.4.4. DSC Spectra

DSC curve of GA (Figure5) showed two endothermic transitions at about 322°C and 419°C. The thermogram of graft copolymer has new endothermic transitions at 252°C and 464°C and this may be due to the enhanced interaction between backbone polymer and the acrylonitrile. These results confirm the grafting of monomer onto polymer.DSC.
(a)(b)


## 4. Conclusion

A novel approach of synthesis has been proposed with the aim of preparing graft copolymers without any homopolymer. The adopted methodology is to initiate polymerization by polymer radicals formed due to interaction of Ce(IV) with polymer. Ce(IV) participates in the initiation and termination steps of polymerization. The grafting was carried out in acidic medium by varying concentration of monomer, polymer, and Ag(I) and the grafting yields were found to be higher in the presence of Ag(I). The grafting mechanism has been explained satisfactorily by the linear termination of grafted polymers.



---

*Source: 942398-2011-12-04.xml*