# Novel Ni-Co-Mo-K Catalysts Supported on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Higher Alcohols Synthesis

Authors: Venkateswara Rao Surisetty; Janusz Kozinski; Ajay Kumar  Dalai
Journal: Journal of Catalysts
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

Alkali-promoted Ni-Co-Mo catalysts supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were prepared using 9 wt% K, 4.5 wt% Co, and 15 wt% Mo, whereas Ni content was varied from 0 to 6 wt%. The catalysts were extensively characterized and studied for higher alcohols synthesis from synthesis gas. Alkali-promoted trimetallic catalyst with 3 wt% Ni showed the highest total alcohols yield of 0.284 gm/(gm of cat./h), ethanol selectivity of 20%, and higher alcohols selectivity of 32% at 330°C and 9.0 MPa using gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 3.8 m3 (STP)/kg of catalyst/h and H2 to CO molar ratio of 1.25.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Ethanol has been used as an additive for reformulated gasoline as unleaded gasoline has become the standard, and short ether compounds (MTBE, ETBE, etc.) have been banned as gasoline octane continues to improve in North America [1]. The catalytic conversion of syngas to ethanol, and other higher alcohols, is generally recognized as an interesting route for the production of clean fuels and petrochemical feedstocks from coal, natural gas, and hydrocarbon wastes via gasification [2]. The catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis (HAS) are divided into two main groups based on the product distribution [3]. Alkali-doped high-temperature ZnCrO-based and low-temperature Cu-based catalysts produce mainly methanol and higher branched alcohols [4, 5]. Methanol synthesis catalysts modified with Fischer-Tropsch (FT) elements and modified Mo-catalysts are the second group of HAS catalysts. These catalysts yield a series of linear primary alcohols and gaseous hydrocarbons both with Anderson-Schulz-Flory (ASF) carbon number distribution [6, 7]. Comparatively, molybdenum-sulfide-based catalysts showed a high proportion of higher alcohols at lower pressure and high temperature. MoS2-based catalysts can tolerate sulfur and coke-buildup as a result of higher alcohols synthesis. When MoS2 is promoted with K2CO3, the same performance of the catalysts is achieved at a significantly lower temperature [8].The alkali-promoted MoS2 catalysts promoted with Co showed high activity to alcohols and can also produce alcohols with a variable ratio of methanol to higher alcohols by changing the operating conditions [9, 10]. The CO hydrogenation was studied over K/Co/Mo/A12O3 and K/Co/Mo/SiO2 catalysts and found that all three elements are necessary for higher activity. Hydrocarbons and alcohols were produced in approximately equal amounts over both the catalysts [11]. Copromotion on alkali-modified MoS2 catalysts leads to the shrinking of MoS2 species, while Co exists mainly in the form of Co-Mo-S phase at low Co loading and partly in a Co9S8-like structure at high Co loading [12]. This structural modification leads to the enhanced C1→C2 homologation step that improves the formation of ethanol as the dominant product [13].Ni is known as Fischer-Tropsch element which has strong methanation tendency in CO hydrogenation reaction. The effect of Ni for the production of higher alcohols was studied using La-promoted Ni/K2CO3/MoS2 catalysts [14]. The authors found that Ni enhanced not only the CO hydrogenation activity but also C2+OH selectivity. This enhancement effect might be related to the improvement structure morphology of Ni and unique surficial chemical environment of the alkali-promoted MoS2 catalyst. Moreover Hedrick et al. [15] concluded that nickel was unique in keeping high activity after sulfur treatment on the Group VIII metals, which is advantageous for the H2S-contained feed gas. Chung and Pien [16] concluded that nickel showed an excellent ability for CO insertion, which has an important significance for higher alcohol synthesis. The formation of Ni-Mo-S phase is related to the electron donation from Ni to Mo, decreasing the Mo-S bond strength to an optimum range, and thus significantly increasing the activity of the catalyst [17].In our previous research, we have studied the effects of different loadings of active metals (Mo), alkali (K) promoters, and metal promoters (Co and Rh) on higher alcohols synthesis from synthesis gas using K-promoted monometallic, bimetallic, and trimetallic MoS2 catalysts [8, 13, 18, 19]. The formation of hydrocarbons and methanol was significantly less over the K-promoted trimetallic catalyst compared to that of monometallic and bimetallic catalysts. It is important to prepare K-promoted trimetallic catalysts using inexpensive metals such as Ni, as explained in the literature, to replace Rh for higher alcohols synthesis from synthesis gas.A multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) is a new form of carbon material which is drawing special attention as a catalyst support [18]. MWCNTs provide a relatively inert support and high-temperature stability, which is similar to that of activated carbon (AC) support [20]. MWCNTs exhibit well-defined hollow interiors and display exceptionally high mechanical strength, thermal stability, and electrical conductivity [21]. Their unique characteristics, such as appropriate pore-size distribution, and nanosized channels, make them a promising support in CO hydrogenation reactions [22]. In our previous research, we have compared higher alcohols synthesis from synthesis gas using alkali-promoted trimetallic Co-Rh-Mo-sulfided catalysts that are supported on AC and MWCNTs [19]. It was found that total alcohols space time yield (STY) and selectivity were higher on the MWCNTs-supported catalyst compared to catalysts supported on activated carbon. These results proved that support pore-size influenced particle size distribution, dispersion, and extent of reduction and plays an important role in diffusing the reactant molecules to the catalytically active centers that are located inside the pores [23]. The microporous structure of activated carbon-supported catalysts caused pore plugging due to the formation of coke and deactivation of the catalyst, which results in transport limitation in the reaction [24].In the present paper, a series of MWCNTs-supported Ni-promoted catalysts with 9 wt% K, 4.5 wt% Co, and 15 wt% Mo are prepared by varying Ni content from 0 to 6 wt%, and the catalytic performance for higher alcohols synthesis over these catalysts is investigated at optimum operating conditions.


## 2. Experimental Method

### 2.1. Preparation of Catalysts

Commercially available MWCNTs are used as catalyst supports and the catalysts were prepared by conventional incipient wetness method, as described in our preceding papers [8, 13, 18, 19, 23–26]. Ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate (AHM), potassium carbonate, cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, and nickel nitrate hexahydrate are used as precursors for Mo, K, Co, and Ni, respectively. At the first step, the support was impregnated with an aqueous solution of K2CO3, followed by drying at 120°C for 2 h, and stabilizing in an argon flow of 50 mL/min at 300°C, at a heating rate of 10°C/min for 4 h. The support was further impregnated with aqueous solutions containing the required amounts of (NH4)6Mo7O24, Co(CH3COO)2, and Ni(NO3)2, followed by drying at 120°C for 2 h and stabilizing in an argon flow of 50 mL/min at 450°C, at a heating rate of 10°C/min for 12 h.To obtain samples in sulfided form for characterization techniques, the catalysts were first sulfided for 6 h at450°C and 500 psi, at a heating rate of 2°C/min using a gaseous mixture containing 10 mole% H2S in H2 at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The catalysts were then cooled to room temperature in a flow of He, and the sample was transferred to sample holders under protection of He.


### 2.2. Catalyst Characterization

The surface area, pore volume, and average pore diameter of sulfide samples were measured by N2-physisorption at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000. Approximately 0.2 g of sample was used for each analysis. The moisture and other adsorbed gases present in the sample were removed before analysis by degassing the sample at 200°C for 2 h under 66.7*10-6 MPa (500 mmHg). The sample was then evacuated at 2.67*10-6 MPa (0.02 mmHg) before N2 adsorption.The contents of Mo, Co, and Ni of the sulfide catalysts were determined using a Perkin-Elmer ELAN 5000 inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) instrument.Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis patterns of sulfide forms of samples were recorded on a Rigaku X-ray diffraction instrument with nickel filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.1541 nm). Each sample was scanned at a rate of 0.05°/s, with 2θ varying from 10 to 80°.The morphology of the sulfided samples was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations, using a Philips CM20 (100 kV) transmission electron microscope equipped with a NARON energy-dispersive spectrometer with a germanium detector.


### 2.3. Catalytic Studies

The catalytic conversion of synthesis gas to higher alcohols was performed using the feed gas mixture CO (40 mole%), H2 (50 mole%), and Ar (10 mole%) in a single-pass tubular downflow fixed-bed reactor under the reaction conditions of 330°C, 9.1 MPa (1320 psig), and 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/(kg of catalyst) over a period of 48 h, including an induction period of 24 h. The detailed description about the high-pressure reaction set-up used in this study was discussed in our previous papers [8, 13, 18, 19, 23–26]. Prior to the reaction, the catalyst was reduced and sulfided for 6 h at 450°C at a heating rate of 2°C/min using a gas mixture containing 10 mol% H2S in H2 and a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The product gas was cooled to 0°C and separated into gas and liquid phases at the reaction pressure. The liquid products were collected at the end of the reaction and analyzed with a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph equipped with a capillary column and a flame ionization detector (FID). The gaseous products were analyzed online on a Shimadzu gas chromatograph through a sampling valve for every 1 h. The experiments were repeated at least twice to check reproducibility and to confirm that the results obtained were within the experimental error of ±2.5%.Mass balance calculations similar to those proposed by Bahome et al. [27] were used to calculate the % CO conversion, % CO2 produced, product space time yield (STY), and alcohol selectivity (wt.%) and are given as follows:
(1)%COConversion=Moles(COin-COout)×gascontractionMoles(COin)×100,
where the gas contraction was determined from the Arin/Arout calibration. Consider
(2)%CO2produced=MolesofCO2producedMolesofCO2converted×100,(3)ProductSTY=Wt.oftheproductproducedWt.ofcat./hr,(4)AlcoholSelectivity(wt.%)=Wt.ofthealcoholproducedTotalwt.oftheproducted×100.


## 2.1. Preparation of Catalysts

Commercially available MWCNTs are used as catalyst supports and the catalysts were prepared by conventional incipient wetness method, as described in our preceding papers [8, 13, 18, 19, 23–26]. Ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate (AHM), potassium carbonate, cobalt acetate tetrahydrate, and nickel nitrate hexahydrate are used as precursors for Mo, K, Co, and Ni, respectively. At the first step, the support was impregnated with an aqueous solution of K2CO3, followed by drying at 120°C for 2 h, and stabilizing in an argon flow of 50 mL/min at 300°C, at a heating rate of 10°C/min for 4 h. The support was further impregnated with aqueous solutions containing the required amounts of (NH4)6Mo7O24, Co(CH3COO)2, and Ni(NO3)2, followed by drying at 120°C for 2 h and stabilizing in an argon flow of 50 mL/min at 450°C, at a heating rate of 10°C/min for 12 h.To obtain samples in sulfided form for characterization techniques, the catalysts were first sulfided for 6 h at450°C and 500 psi, at a heating rate of 2°C/min using a gaseous mixture containing 10 mole% H2S in H2 at a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The catalysts were then cooled to room temperature in a flow of He, and the sample was transferred to sample holders under protection of He.


## 2.2. Catalyst Characterization

The surface area, pore volume, and average pore diameter of sulfide samples were measured by N2-physisorption at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2000. Approximately 0.2 g of sample was used for each analysis. The moisture and other adsorbed gases present in the sample were removed before analysis by degassing the sample at 200°C for 2 h under 66.7*10-6 MPa (500 mmHg). The sample was then evacuated at 2.67*10-6 MPa (0.02 mmHg) before N2 adsorption.The contents of Mo, Co, and Ni of the sulfide catalysts were determined using a Perkin-Elmer ELAN 5000 inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) instrument.Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis patterns of sulfide forms of samples were recorded on a Rigaku X-ray diffraction instrument with nickel filtered Cu Kα radiation (λ=0.1541 nm). Each sample was scanned at a rate of 0.05°/s, with 2θ varying from 10 to 80°.The morphology of the sulfided samples was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) investigations, using a Philips CM20 (100 kV) transmission electron microscope equipped with a NARON energy-dispersive spectrometer with a germanium detector.


## 2.3. Catalytic Studies

The catalytic conversion of synthesis gas to higher alcohols was performed using the feed gas mixture CO (40 mole%), H2 (50 mole%), and Ar (10 mole%) in a single-pass tubular downflow fixed-bed reactor under the reaction conditions of 330°C, 9.1 MPa (1320 psig), and 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/(kg of catalyst) over a period of 48 h, including an induction period of 24 h. The detailed description about the high-pressure reaction set-up used in this study was discussed in our previous papers [8, 13, 18, 19, 23–26]. Prior to the reaction, the catalyst was reduced and sulfided for 6 h at 450°C at a heating rate of 2°C/min using a gas mixture containing 10 mol% H2S in H2 and a flow rate of 50 mL/min. The product gas was cooled to 0°C and separated into gas and liquid phases at the reaction pressure. The liquid products were collected at the end of the reaction and analyzed with a Varian 3400 gas chromatograph equipped with a capillary column and a flame ionization detector (FID). The gaseous products were analyzed online on a Shimadzu gas chromatograph through a sampling valve for every 1 h. The experiments were repeated at least twice to check reproducibility and to confirm that the results obtained were within the experimental error of ±2.5%.Mass balance calculations similar to those proposed by Bahome et al. [27] were used to calculate the % CO conversion, % CO2 produced, product space time yield (STY), and alcohol selectivity (wt.%) and are given as follows:
(1)%COConversion=Moles(COin-COout)×gascontractionMoles(COin)×100,
where the gas contraction was determined from the Arin/Arout calibration. Consider
(2)%CO2produced=MolesofCO2producedMolesofCO2converted×100,(3)ProductSTY=Wt.oftheproductproducedWt.ofcat./hr,(4)AlcoholSelectivity(wt.%)=Wt.ofthealcoholproducedTotalwt.oftheproducted×100.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Catalyst Characterization

The Ni, Co, and Mo contents of the stabilized catalysts are measured by ICP-MS after sulfidation and are reported in Table1 along with the targeted compositions. The measured contents of the prepared catalysts are slightly lower compared to targeted values, which may be due to the hygroscopic nature of precursors.Table 1
Elemental compositions of sulfided catalysts.
Catalyst
Targeted composition (wt%)
Measured composition (wt%)
K
Mo
Co
Ni
Mo
Co
Ni
Acid Treated MWCNT
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
9
15
4.5
—
14.3
4.3
—
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
1.5
13.9
4.1
1.2
3.0 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
3.0
13.7
4.0
2.5
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
4.5
14.1
3.8
3.9
6 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
6.0
13.6
4.3
5.7Table2 shows the results for surface area, total pore volume, and average pore diameter of the stabilized catalysts in sulfide form. The BET surface area of the MWCNTs increased from 178 to 220 m2/g after acid treatment. Acid treatment opens the nanotube caps and removes impurities from the MWCNTs. The MWCNT-supported bimetallic (4.5 wt% Co and 15 wt% Mo) catalyst promoted with 9 wt% K showed a BET surface area of 89 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.36 cm3/g, increasing the amount of Ni from 1.5 to 6 wt% and decreasing the BET surface area of the MWCNT-supported alkali-promoted trimetallic catalysts from 80 to 57 m2/g and the total pore volume from 0.30 to 0.12 cm3/g.Table 2
Textural characteristics of catalysts in sulfide form.
Catalyst
BET surface area (m2/g)
Total pore volume (cc/g)
Average pore diameter (nm)
Acid Treated MWCNT
220
0.66
10.9
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
89
0.36
15.7
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
80
0.30
16.9
3.0 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
72
0.25
17.4
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
65
0.19
18.1
6 wt%  Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
57
0.12
18.8The typical XRD patterns of the second screening catalysts are shown in Figure1. Apart from the peaks for the support, MWCNTs (2θ=27 and 43.5°), there are no peaks with significant intensity indicating that the metal particles are finely dispersed and smaller than the detection limit of the XRD instrument.Figure 1
XRD patterns of catalysts in sulfide form.TEM images of the catalysts were recorded and the representative image of a 3.0 wt% Ni-promoted Mo-K/MWCNT catalyst was selected from several micrographs and is shown in Figure2. The carbon nanotube size and particle size are measured using imaging particle analyzer. The carbon nanotubes are multi-walled, with inner diameters in the range of 8–15 nm and wall thickness in the range of 5 to 10 nm. Most of the nanotube caps are found to be open. No amorphous carbon or other impurities are observed in and around the tubes. The particle sizes of the metal species that are inside (~60%) and outside (~40%) of the tubes are in the range of 3–5 nm. This revealed that the catalyst particles are well dispersed both inside the carbon nanotubes and on the outside of the tube walls.Figure 2
TEM image of 3 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNT.


### 3.2. Catalytic Studies

The catalyst activity studies towards higher alcohol synthesis reaction were carried out under similar conditions at 330°C, 9.1 (1320 psig), and 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/(kg of catalyst) over a period of 48 h, including an induction period of 24 h. Figure 3 gives the results of the percentage CO conversion as time-on-stream during 48 h of higher alcohols synthesis over MWCNT-supported alkali-modified Ni-promoted Co-Mo catalysts. CO conversion sharply reduced in the first 18 h and then levelled off, indicating that the catalyst was quite stable after 18 h of time-on-stream during the 48 h alcohol synthesis. A 43% CO conversion is observed on the alkali-modified bimetallic Co-Mo catalyst supported on MWCNTs. % CO conversion increased from 47% to 56% with increased Ni content from 1.5 to 6 wt% over the alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs. The catalytic activity and product selectivity data were calculated after an induction period of 24 h.Figure 3
% CO conversion with time-on-stream (wt. of thecatalyst=2 g, P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV=3.8 m3 (STP)/h/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molarratio=1.25).The analysis of the liquid products indicates that linear alcohols are formed and no branched alcohols were observed in the GC trace corresponding to the higher alcohols. This analysis confirmed that higher alcohols synthesis from CO hydrogenation over alkali-modified trimetallic Ni-Co-Mo catalysts likely follow a CO insertion mechanism as suggested by Santiesteban [31]. Methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, and n-butanol are the major products, together with other higher alcohols. The analysis of exit gas indicates that methane is the major component apart from CO2 and unconverted gases, such as, CO, H2, and Ar.Table3 shows the activity and selectivity results obtained from CO hydrogenation over the sulfided alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo catalysts. The term higher alcohols represents the ethanol and alcohols with a carbon number greater than 2 (C2+ alcohols). The total alcohols and total hydrocarbons space time yields (STYs) of 0.239 and 0.352 gm/(gm of cat./h), respectively, are observed over the nickel-free MWCNT-supported catalyst. With the addition of 1.5 wt% Ni on the MWCNT-supported 4.5 wt% Co, 15 wt% Mo, and 9 wt% K catalyst, the total alcohols and total hydrocarbon STY increased to 0.262 and 0.361 gm/(gm of cat.)/h, respectively. The methanol, ethanol, and higher alcohols selectivity increased from 5.3%, 16.8%, and 26.6% over the alkali-modified bimetallic Co-Mo/MWCNT catalyst to 7.1%, 18.9%, and 29.4% on the MWCNT-supported alkali-modified trimetallic catalyst promoted with 1.5 wt% Ni. By increasing the Ni loading from 1.5 to 3 wt% on the MWCNT-supported trimetallic catalyst, the total alcohols STY increased from 0.262 to 0.284 gm/(gm of cat.)/h and total hydrocarbons STY increased from 0.361 to 0.375 gm/(gm of cat.)/h. These results confirmed that nickel promoter not only improved the formation of alcohols but also benefited the formation of hydrocarbons.Table 3
Catalytic performance of sulfided MWCNT-supported catalysts (wt. of the catalyst = 2 gm,P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV = 3.8 m3(STP)/hr/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molar ratio = 1.25).
Catalyst
Product STY(gm/(gm of cat.)/h)
Alcohol selectivity(wt %)
CO conversion(%)
Totalalcohols
TotalHydrocarbons
CO2 produced (mol. %)
Methanol
Ethanol
Higheralcohols
Totalalcohols
Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
43.3
0.239
0.352
36.6
5.3
16.8
26.6
31.9
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
47.5
0.262
0.361
37.1
7.1
18.9
29.4
36.5
3 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
48.8
0.284
0.375
38.2
7.9
20.2
32.8
40.7
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
52.9
0.275
0.388
40.1
7.5
19.5
32.1
39.6
6 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
56.2
0.269
0.403
41.5
6.8
18.1
29.9
36.7The total alcohols STYs are comparatively low over 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni-promoted alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs, than that of the catalyst with 3 wt% Ni content. Chung and Pien [16] observed the formation of NiO species at higher Ni content in H2-TPR studies. Hydrocarbon STYs of 0.388 and 0.403 gm/(gm of cat.)/h are observed over the alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs promoted with 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni, respectively, which may be due to increased formation of NiO species. These results confirmed that the methanation activity of the catalyst is increased at higher Ni (4.5 and 6 wt.%) contents. The selectivity of methanol, ethanol, and higher alcohols is found to be low on the 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni-promoted catalysts compared to that of catalysts with less Ni content, which can be explained due to the formation of hydrocarbons. The water-gas-shift reaction rate increased from 37% to 42% with increased Ni content from 0 to 6 wt% over the alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs.Figure4 represents the molar percentage distribution of alcohols on 3 wt% Ni-promoted Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs catalysts. Ethanol is the major product (41%) together with methanol (22%), propanol (15%), and butanol (12%). A little amount of higher alcohols (Cn>4) up to octanol is also detected over these Ni-promoted CoMo-K/MWCNTs catalysts. These results confirmed that Ni promotes the activity and selectivity toward higher alcohols (particularly ethyl alcohol).Figure 4
Molar percentage of alcohols over the catalyst 3 wt% Ni-Mo-K/MWCNTs (wt. of thecatalyst=2 g, P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV=3.8 m3 (STP)/h/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molarratio=1.25).Table4 compares the activities of sulfided 3 wt.% Ni, 4.5 wt.% Co, 15 wt.% Mo, and 9 wt.% K supported on MWCNTs with those of other catalysts discussed in the literature. It can be observed from this table that the addition of transition metals such as Ni and Co to alkali-modified molybdenum-based catalysts improved CO hydrogenation which enhanced space time yield of methanol, higher alcohols, and hydrocarbons [13, 28–30, 32]. The catalyst with the highest activity from each work was selected for comparison purposes. From Table 4 it can be observed that the alcohol STY of 0.285 gm/(gm of cat./h) over sulfided alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo catalysts supported on MWCNT at 1300 psig, 330°C, 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/kg of catalyst and H2/CO molar ratio of 1.25 is better than that the catalyst performance reported in the literature.Table 4
Comparison of the activities of alkali-modified molybdenum-based catalysts promoted with transition metals.
Reference
Li et al., 2001 [28]
Li et al., 2001 [29]
Qi et al., 2003 [30]
Surisetty et al., 2010 [13]
Present work
Catalyst
Mo-K/AC
Co-Mo-K/AC
Ni-Mo-K
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
Ni-Co-Mo-K /MWCNT
Temperature (°C)
330
330
315
330
330
Pressure (MPa)
5.0
5.0
9.5
8.3
9.0
H2/CO molar ratio
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.25
GHSV (L/kgcat./h) *(h−1)
7200
*4800
6000
3600
3800
CO conversion (%)
13
14 (CO2-free)
23
45
49
STY of total alcohols†(g/gcat./h) ††(g/mLcat./h) (mL/gcat./h)
†23.1
††0.199
0.220
0.236
0.284
STY of higher alcohols (g/gcat./h) &(CO mol/kgcat/h) &&(mL/gcat./h)
&12. 1
&&0.114
—
0.171
0.228
STY of hydrocarbon (g/gcat./h)¥(% of CO)
¥38
—
—
0.395
0.375
Total alcohols selectivity(wt%)
—
47 (CO2-free)
60 (CO2-free)
32
43


## 3.1. Catalyst Characterization

The Ni, Co, and Mo contents of the stabilized catalysts are measured by ICP-MS after sulfidation and are reported in Table1 along with the targeted compositions. The measured contents of the prepared catalysts are slightly lower compared to targeted values, which may be due to the hygroscopic nature of precursors.Table 1
Elemental compositions of sulfided catalysts.
Catalyst
Targeted composition (wt%)
Measured composition (wt%)
K
Mo
Co
Ni
Mo
Co
Ni
Acid Treated MWCNT
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
9
15
4.5
—
14.3
4.3
—
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
1.5
13.9
4.1
1.2
3.0 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
3.0
13.7
4.0
2.5
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
4.5
14.1
3.8
3.9
6 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
9
15
4.5
6.0
13.6
4.3
5.7Table2 shows the results for surface area, total pore volume, and average pore diameter of the stabilized catalysts in sulfide form. The BET surface area of the MWCNTs increased from 178 to 220 m2/g after acid treatment. Acid treatment opens the nanotube caps and removes impurities from the MWCNTs. The MWCNT-supported bimetallic (4.5 wt% Co and 15 wt% Mo) catalyst promoted with 9 wt% K showed a BET surface area of 89 m2/g and a total pore volume of 0.36 cm3/g, increasing the amount of Ni from 1.5 to 6 wt% and decreasing the BET surface area of the MWCNT-supported alkali-promoted trimetallic catalysts from 80 to 57 m2/g and the total pore volume from 0.30 to 0.12 cm3/g.Table 2
Textural characteristics of catalysts in sulfide form.
Catalyst
BET surface area (m2/g)
Total pore volume (cc/g)
Average pore diameter (nm)
Acid Treated MWCNT
220
0.66
10.9
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
89
0.36
15.7
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
80
0.30
16.9
3.0 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
72
0.25
17.4
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
65
0.19
18.1
6 wt%  Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
57
0.12
18.8The typical XRD patterns of the second screening catalysts are shown in Figure1. Apart from the peaks for the support, MWCNTs (2θ=27 and 43.5°), there are no peaks with significant intensity indicating that the metal particles are finely dispersed and smaller than the detection limit of the XRD instrument.Figure 1
XRD patterns of catalysts in sulfide form.TEM images of the catalysts were recorded and the representative image of a 3.0 wt% Ni-promoted Mo-K/MWCNT catalyst was selected from several micrographs and is shown in Figure2. The carbon nanotube size and particle size are measured using imaging particle analyzer. The carbon nanotubes are multi-walled, with inner diameters in the range of 8–15 nm and wall thickness in the range of 5 to 10 nm. Most of the nanotube caps are found to be open. No amorphous carbon or other impurities are observed in and around the tubes. The particle sizes of the metal species that are inside (~60%) and outside (~40%) of the tubes are in the range of 3–5 nm. This revealed that the catalyst particles are well dispersed both inside the carbon nanotubes and on the outside of the tube walls.Figure 2
TEM image of 3 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNT.


## 3.2. Catalytic Studies

The catalyst activity studies towards higher alcohol synthesis reaction were carried out under similar conditions at 330°C, 9.1 (1320 psig), and 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/(kg of catalyst) over a period of 48 h, including an induction period of 24 h. Figure 3 gives the results of the percentage CO conversion as time-on-stream during 48 h of higher alcohols synthesis over MWCNT-supported alkali-modified Ni-promoted Co-Mo catalysts. CO conversion sharply reduced in the first 18 h and then levelled off, indicating that the catalyst was quite stable after 18 h of time-on-stream during the 48 h alcohol synthesis. A 43% CO conversion is observed on the alkali-modified bimetallic Co-Mo catalyst supported on MWCNTs. % CO conversion increased from 47% to 56% with increased Ni content from 1.5 to 6 wt% over the alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs. The catalytic activity and product selectivity data were calculated after an induction period of 24 h.Figure 3
% CO conversion with time-on-stream (wt. of thecatalyst=2 g, P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV=3.8 m3 (STP)/h/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molarratio=1.25).The analysis of the liquid products indicates that linear alcohols are formed and no branched alcohols were observed in the GC trace corresponding to the higher alcohols. This analysis confirmed that higher alcohols synthesis from CO hydrogenation over alkali-modified trimetallic Ni-Co-Mo catalysts likely follow a CO insertion mechanism as suggested by Santiesteban [31]. Methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, and n-butanol are the major products, together with other higher alcohols. The analysis of exit gas indicates that methane is the major component apart from CO2 and unconverted gases, such as, CO, H2, and Ar.Table3 shows the activity and selectivity results obtained from CO hydrogenation over the sulfided alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo catalysts. The term higher alcohols represents the ethanol and alcohols with a carbon number greater than 2 (C2+ alcohols). The total alcohols and total hydrocarbons space time yields (STYs) of 0.239 and 0.352 gm/(gm of cat./h), respectively, are observed over the nickel-free MWCNT-supported catalyst. With the addition of 1.5 wt% Ni on the MWCNT-supported 4.5 wt% Co, 15 wt% Mo, and 9 wt% K catalyst, the total alcohols and total hydrocarbon STY increased to 0.262 and 0.361 gm/(gm of cat.)/h, respectively. The methanol, ethanol, and higher alcohols selectivity increased from 5.3%, 16.8%, and 26.6% over the alkali-modified bimetallic Co-Mo/MWCNT catalyst to 7.1%, 18.9%, and 29.4% on the MWCNT-supported alkali-modified trimetallic catalyst promoted with 1.5 wt% Ni. By increasing the Ni loading from 1.5 to 3 wt% on the MWCNT-supported trimetallic catalyst, the total alcohols STY increased from 0.262 to 0.284 gm/(gm of cat.)/h and total hydrocarbons STY increased from 0.361 to 0.375 gm/(gm of cat.)/h. These results confirmed that nickel promoter not only improved the formation of alcohols but also benefited the formation of hydrocarbons.Table 3
Catalytic performance of sulfided MWCNT-supported catalysts (wt. of the catalyst = 2 gm,P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV = 3.8 m3(STP)/hr/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molar ratio = 1.25).
Catalyst
Product STY(gm/(gm of cat.)/h)
Alcohol selectivity(wt %)
CO conversion(%)
Totalalcohols
TotalHydrocarbons
CO2 produced (mol. %)
Methanol
Ethanol
Higheralcohols
Totalalcohols
Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
43.3
0.239
0.352
36.6
5.3
16.8
26.6
31.9
1.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
47.5
0.262
0.361
37.1
7.1
18.9
29.4
36.5
3 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
48.8
0.284
0.375
38.2
7.9
20.2
32.8
40.7
4.5 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
52.9
0.275
0.388
40.1
7.5
19.5
32.1
39.6
6 wt% Ni-Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs
56.2
0.269
0.403
41.5
6.8
18.1
29.9
36.7The total alcohols STYs are comparatively low over 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni-promoted alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs, than that of the catalyst with 3 wt% Ni content. Chung and Pien [16] observed the formation of NiO species at higher Ni content in H2-TPR studies. Hydrocarbon STYs of 0.388 and 0.403 gm/(gm of cat.)/h are observed over the alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs promoted with 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni, respectively, which may be due to increased formation of NiO species. These results confirmed that the methanation activity of the catalyst is increased at higher Ni (4.5 and 6 wt.%) contents. The selectivity of methanol, ethanol, and higher alcohols is found to be low on the 4.5 and 6 wt% Ni-promoted catalysts compared to that of catalysts with less Ni content, which can be explained due to the formation of hydrocarbons. The water-gas-shift reaction rate increased from 37% to 42% with increased Ni content from 0 to 6 wt% over the alkali-modified trimetallic catalysts supported on MWCNTs.Figure4 represents the molar percentage distribution of alcohols on 3 wt% Ni-promoted Co-Mo-K/MWCNTs catalysts. Ethanol is the major product (41%) together with methanol (22%), propanol (15%), and butanol (12%). A little amount of higher alcohols (Cn>4) up to octanol is also detected over these Ni-promoted CoMo-K/MWCNTs catalysts. These results confirmed that Ni promotes the activity and selectivity toward higher alcohols (particularly ethyl alcohol).Figure 4
Molar percentage of alcohols over the catalyst 3 wt% Ni-Mo-K/MWCNTs (wt. of thecatalyst=2 g, P=9.0 MPa (1300 psig), T=330°C, GHSV=3.8 m3 (STP)/h/kg of catalyst, H2/CO molarratio=1.25).Table4 compares the activities of sulfided 3 wt.% Ni, 4.5 wt.% Co, 15 wt.% Mo, and 9 wt.% K supported on MWCNTs with those of other catalysts discussed in the literature. It can be observed from this table that the addition of transition metals such as Ni and Co to alkali-modified molybdenum-based catalysts improved CO hydrogenation which enhanced space time yield of methanol, higher alcohols, and hydrocarbons [13, 28–30, 32]. The catalyst with the highest activity from each work was selected for comparison purposes. From Table 4 it can be observed that the alcohol STY of 0.285 gm/(gm of cat./h) over sulfided alkali-modified Ni-Co-Mo catalysts supported on MWCNT at 1300 psig, 330°C, 3.8 m3 (STP)/hr/kg of catalyst and H2/CO molar ratio of 1.25 is better than that the catalyst performance reported in the literature.Table 4
Comparison of the activities of alkali-modified molybdenum-based catalysts promoted with transition metals.
Reference
Li et al., 2001 [28]
Li et al., 2001 [29]
Qi et al., 2003 [30]
Surisetty et al., 2010 [13]
Present work
Catalyst
Mo-K/AC
Co-Mo-K/AC
Ni-Mo-K
Co-Mo-K/MWCNT
Ni-Co-Mo-K /MWCNT
Temperature (°C)
330
330
315
330
330
Pressure (MPa)
5.0
5.0
9.5
8.3
9.0
H2/CO molar ratio
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.25
GHSV (L/kgcat./h) *(h−1)
7200
*4800
6000
3600
3800
CO conversion (%)
13
14 (CO2-free)
23
45
49
STY of total alcohols†(g/gcat./h) ††(g/mLcat./h) (mL/gcat./h)
†23.1
††0.199
0.220
0.236
0.284
STY of higher alcohols (g/gcat./h) &(CO mol/kgcat/h) &&(mL/gcat./h)
&12. 1
&&0.114
—
0.171
0.228
STY of hydrocarbon (g/gcat./h)¥(% of CO)
¥38
—
—
0.395
0.375
Total alcohols selectivity(wt%)
—
47 (CO2-free)
60 (CO2-free)
32
43


## 4. Conclusions

The incorporation of Ni to the alkali-promoted bimetallic Co-Mo catalyst resulted in substantial changes in both structure properties and catalytic performance. Metal species were uniformly distributed both inside the tubes and on the outside of the tubes, with particle sizes in the range of 1 to 2 nm. The MWCNT-supported alkali-promoted trimetallic catalyst with 3 wt% Ni showed the highest total alcohols yield of 0.284 gm/(gm of cat./h), ethanol selectivity of 20.2%, and higher alcohols selectivity of 32.8% at 330°C and 8.96 MPa using gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 3.8 m3 (STP)/kg of catalyst/h and H2 to CO molar ratio of 1.25. Ni-promotion to K-modified Co-Mo catalysts supported on MWCNTs improved the activity and selectivity toward higher alcohols (particularly ethyl alcohol).



---

*Source: 942145-2013-03-20.xml*