# Synthesis of Novel Derivatives of Carbazole-Thiophene, Their Electronic Properties, and Computational Studies

Authors: E. F. Damit; N. Nordin; A. Ariffin; K. Sulaiman
Journal: Journal of Chemistry
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

A series of carbazole-thiophene dimers,P1–P9, were synthesized using Suzuki-Miyaura and Ullmann coupling reactions. InP1–P9, carbazole-thiophenes were linked at the N-9 position for different core groups via biphenyl, dimethylbiphenyl, and phenyl. Electronic properties were evaluated by UV-Vis, cyclic voltammogram, and theoretical calculations. Particularly, the effects of conjugation connectivity on photophysical and electrochemical properties, as well as the correlation between carbazole-thiophene and the core, were studied. Carbazole connecting with thiophenes at the 3,6-positions and the phenyl group as a core group leads to increased stabilization of HOMO and LUMO energy levels where the bandgap (Δ
E) is significantly reduced.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are alternatives to amorphous silicon as materials for thin film solar cells. Photovoltaics with small molecule-based active layers possess several potential advantages over polymer systems. Compared to polymers, small molecules do not suffer from the effects of polydispersity, tend to have less batch-to-batch variation, and are easily functionalized and purified via standard techniques [1].π-Conjugated oligomers and polymers have attracted much attention in recent decades due to their potential uses as semiconductors and electroactive materials in various organic electronic devices such as organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), organic solar cells (OSCs), and nonlinear optical devices [2–11]. These oligomers have an advantage in terms of convenient fine-tuning of electronic, photophysical, and electrochemical properties by rational structural modification to achieve optimal device performance. Moreover, π-conjugated oligomers with sophisticated functionalities are now key components in molecular electronics [12, 13].Carbazole has fine optical properties, a low redox potential, and high chemical stability; thus, oligo/polycarbazoles have served as representative benchmark materials in OFETs, OLEDs, and OSCs [14–18]. Poly(3,6-carbazole)s and 3,6-functionalized carbazoles have been extensively studied over the past few decades because carbazole groups can be easily functionalized by electrophilic substitution at its 3- and 6-positions (para positions from the nitrogen atom) due to of their high electron density. In this context, carbazoles can be regarded as important scaffolds for the construction of π-functional materials because of their rich diversity in structural modification. Oligothiophenes, particularly α-oligothiophenes, are among the most intensively investigated organic compounds for a variety of materials applications [19, 20]. Hence, mixed π-conjugated oligomers composed of carbazole and thiophene moieties have recently attracted considerable attention from the viewpoint of their potential as the active component of organic electronics and their synthetic accessibility. Various carbazole-thiophene hybrid oligomers that are used as functional materials by using their fluorescence and donor properties have been reported [21–25]; in particular, a large number of derivatives possessing the anchoring and acceptor groups used for OSCs have been recently synthesized since the pioneering work by Koumura, Hara, and coworkers [26–32]. However, less attention has been given to the clarification of the structure property relationships in the carbazole-thiophene-based π-system, which are indispensable for materials design. Recently a large series of thienyl-substituted carbazole derivatives (thienylcarbazoles) were synthesized, and the effects of the connection between the carbazole and thiophene moieties on the photophysical and electrochemical properties were investigated [18]. Studies have shown that both vapor and solution-based deposition of small molecules can lead to efficient multilayer or bulk heterojunction (BJH) devices, suggesting the importance of the final film microstructure, rather than fabrication techniques, on device performance [33]. Because the mobility of the charge carrier depends on the molecular ordering and hence the degree of crystallinity [34], small molecules may have the advantage of higher charge carrier mobilities. Despite recent efforts to characterize the morphology of small molecule BHJs [35, 36] knowledge regarding these systems is still lacking. In the current study, a series of thienylcarbazoles were prepared and detailed theoretical and experimental investigation of the molecular planarity influenced by the degree of conjunction at different types of cores and how this property impacts E
g
a
p by investigating individual E
L
U
M
O and E
H
O
M
O were carried out.Here, the synthesis, structural features, and electronic and photophysical properties ofP4–P9 (Figure 1) according to UV-Vis, fluorescence spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and theoretical calculations in comparison with reported compoundsP1–P3 are described.Figure 1
Structures of compounds.


## 2. Results and Discussion

### 2.1. Synthesis

The synthesis of compoundsP1–P9 was described in three parts as outlined in Schemes 1 and 2. The key steps in the synthesis of the compounds involved Suzuki-Miyaura [37] and Ullmann coupling [38] reactions. The detailed procedures for the synthesis of the compound are described in Section 4.Scheme 1
Synthesis ofP4,P5, andP6. (i) I2 (0.5 eq), AcOH, and reflux. (ii) K2CO3, Pd(PPh3)4, EtOH, and reflux for 24 h. (iii) K2CO3, copper powder, 18-crown-6,o-DCB, and reflux.Scheme 2
Synthesis ofP7,P8, andP9. (i) I2 (1 eq), AcOH, and reflux. (ii) K2CO3, Pd(PPh3)4, EtOH, and reflux for 24 h. (iii) K2CO3, Cu, 18-crown-6,o-DCB, and reflux.The Ullmann coupling reaction was performed on carbazole (1) with either 4,4-diiodobiphenyl (2), 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl (3), or 1,4-diiodobenzene (4) to giveP1,P2, andP3 in 50%, 60%, and 80% yields, respectively. CompoundsP1 (CBP) [39, 40],P2 (CDBP) [41], andP3 (BCP) [39, 40] are known compounds.The syntheses of compoundsP4,P5, andP6 were achieved in three steps starting from carbazole (1) as described in Scheme 1. The first step involved iodination of1 using 0.5 eq of iodine to give 3-iodocarbzole (5). This was followed by Suzuki-Miyaura cross coupling of5 with thiophene-2-boronic acid pinacol ester (6) to produce monothienyl-substituted carbazole (7). Ullmann coupling of compound7 with compounds2,3, and4 afforded compoundsP4,P5, andP6 in 26%, 35%, and 48% yields, respectively.In a similar approach, compoundsP7,P8, andP9 were synthesized in three steps from compound1 as described in Scheme 2. Iodination of compound1 using 1 eq of iodine gave 3,6-diiodocarbazole (8), which was then refluxed with compound6 to give dithienyl-substituted carbazole (9). Ullmann coupling of9 with2,3, and4 gave compoundsP7,P8, andP9 in 75%, 60%, and 50% yields, respectively. All of the compounds were fully characterized by spectroscopic methods such as 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectroscopy.


### 2.2. Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy

The UV-Vis absorption spectra ofP1–P9 were measured in DMF solutions (Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c)), and the λ
m
a
x
a
b
s values for quantifying the extent of π-conjugation are summarized in Table 1. It is clearly observed from Figures 2(a)–2(c) that the maximum absorption peak shifts to a longer wavelength as the number of thiophene groups increases. The absorption bands of all of the compounds were gradually red-shifted, when the thiophene group was connected to the carbazole at the 3- and 6-positions and the extent of π-conjugation in the compounds increased, as expected. CompoundsP4,P5,P6,P7,P8, andP9 show the longest wavelength absorptions at 377, 373, 372, 390, 393, and 414 nm, respectively (Figure 2), which were considerably red-shifted in comparison to those of compoundsP1,P2, andP3. For compoundsP7,P8, andP9, we noted a maximum absorption wavelength at a higher absorbance, indicating that the attachment of thiophene groups at the 3- and 6-positions of the carbazole with a phenyl group core significantly enhances the optical properties (Figure 3(c)). Furthermore, the slight shift of wavelength for a fixed number of thiophene groups, bridging biphenyl groups, dimethylbiphenyl, and phenyl suggests that the differences in core groups in the compounds affect the optical properties. Noticeably, λ
m
a
x
a
b
s are not affected by the changes of core groups (Figures 3(a)–3(c)).Table 1
UV-Vis: spectroscopic data and fluorescence on 300 nm excitationa.
λ
m
a
x
a
b
s (nm)
λ
o
n
s
e
t (nm)
λ
e
m
c (nm)
P1 (CBP)
293, 317b, 340b
360
390
P2
293, 328b, 341b
353
351
P3
293, 326b, 340b
352
355
P4
301, 325b
377
413
P5
293b, 303, 322b
373
396
P6
294b, 303, 324b
372
394
P7
318, 344b
390
412
P8
313
393
410
P9
316
414
519
aMeasured in DMF. bPeak as shoulder. cWavelength of the intensity maxima of the fluorescence at 300 nm excitation at room temperature.Figure 2
Electronic absorption spectra of (a)P1,P4, andP7; (b)P2,P5, andP8; and (c)P3,P6, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 3
Electronic absorption spectra of (a)P1,P2, andP3; (b)P4,P5, andP6; and (c)P7,P8, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)It is well known thatπ-conjugated thiophene oligomers and polymers tend to π-stack because of the strong intermolecular interaction between π-electrons [27]. The difference in intermolecular π-π interaction for these compounds would account for the differences in the broadness of their UV-Vis absorption spectra, as shown in Figure 2. We also observe that the broadness increased slightly as the numbers of thiophene groups increased [44].It is well known thatπ-conjugated thiophene oligomers and polymers tend to π-stack due to the strong intermolecular interaction between π-electrons [27]. The difference of intermolecular π-π interaction for these compounds would account for their different broadness of UV-Vis absorption spectra, as shown in Figure 3. We also observe that the broadness increased slightly with the increasing number of thiophenes [44].All the compoundsP1–P9 are fluorescent. After the functionalization of the carbazole groups, the fluorescence maxima (λ
e
m) gradually red-shifted upon the addition of thiophene group, resulting in a significant red shift in the emission spectrum as shown in Figures 4(a)–4(c), and the spectral data are summarized in Table 1. The broad absorption band in the fluorescence spectra ofP4,P5,P6,P7,P8, andP9 suggest the contribution of a more rigid structure in the excited state, namely, the quinoid state, than the ground state [45]. In contrast to the absorption, we note that the emission ofP1 is red-shifted compared toP2 andP3, which is attributed to the planarization ofP1 after the transition state to the excited state. Such a geometric relaxation is not possible forP2 due to the bulkier side on the introduction of methyl group at core group (Figure 5(a)) [46]. Similarly,P4 is red-shifted compared toP5 andP6 (Figure 5(b)). As the attachment of thiophene at 3- and 6- on the carbazole forP7,P8, andP9, λ
e
m are not significantly affected by the change of core groups (Figure 5(c)).Figure 4
Emission spectra of (a)P1,P4, andP7; (b)P2,P5, andP8; and (c)P3,P6, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 5
Emission spectra of (a)P1,P2, andP3; (b)P4,P5, andP6; and (c)P7,P8, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Carbazole-thiophenes possess nonplanar structures in their ground state (S
0) and become almost planar in the lowest state (S
1) [47, 48]. This is expected because, with the addition of each thiophene group onP7,P8, andP9, these compounds are more conformationally flexible and thus produce a more diffuse spectrum [49]. The larger the number of π-electrons in a chromophore, the greater the shift to the red of the fluorescence and absorption spectra. Thus, the characteristics of a planar chromophore can be interpreted as being because, in this configuration, the number of functional π-electrons is a maximum [50].


### 2.3. Electrochemical Properties

To elucidate the effects of the degree of conjugation between the core, carbazole, and thiophene groups and the elongation of the molecular length on donor ability and electrochemical stability, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed in a conventional three-electrode cell using a platinum working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode. In particular, the oxidation processes forP1–P9 were investigated in a DMF solution containing 0.05 mol L−1 of n-Bu4NPF6 as a supporting electrolyte (Figure 6). The oxidation potential (E
p
a) and onset (E
o
n
s
e
t) versus Fc+/Fc (ferrocenium/ferrocene couple) are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Oxidation potential (E
p
a) and onset (E
o
n
s
e
t) by cyclic voltammetry in DMF (0.05 mol L−1 n-Bu4NPF6)a, and optical HOMO-LUMO gaps (Δ
E
o
p
t)b.
E
p
a (V)
E
o
n
s
e
t (V)
HOMOc (eV)
LUMOd (eV)
Δ
E
o
p
t
b (eV)
P1
+1.04
+0.89
-
5.69, -
5.63 [41]
-
2.25
3.44, 3.47 [41]
P2
+1.13
+0.90
-
5.70, -
5.64 [41]
-
2.18
3.52, 3.51 [41]
P3
+1.04
+0.82
-
5.62
-
2.09
3.53
P4
+1.16
+0.90
-
5.70
-
2.41
3.29
P5
+1.41
+1.09
-
5.89
-
2.56
3.33
P6
+1.44
+1.14
-
5.94
-
2.60
3.34
P7
+1.28
+0.92
-
5.72
-
2.54
3.18
P8
+1.38
+1.05
-
5.85
-
2.69
3.16
P9
+1.44
+1.19
-
5.99
-
2.99
3.00
aAll potentials are given versus the Fc+/Fc couple used as the external standard; the scan rate is 100 mV s−1. bThe values are obtained from UV/Vis absorption onset λ
o
n
s
e
t. cThe values are those deduced from the E
o
n
s
e
t values according to the following equation: HOMO = -
(
4.8
+
E
o
n
s
e
t
) eV [42, 43]. dEstimated from the HOMO values and the optical band gap Δ
E
o
p
t.Figure 6
Cyclic voltammogram (0.1 Vs−1) for (a) compoundsP1,P2, andP3; (b) compoundsP4,P5, andP6; and (c) compoundsP7,P8, andP9 with ferrocene as an external standard in DMF—0.05 M B
u
n
4
N
P
F
6.
(a)
(b)
(c)Noticeably,E
p
a values forP4–P9 (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)) are cathodically shifted compared to those forP1,P2, andP3 (Figure 6(a)) by the subsequent addition of thiophene molecules, demonstrating that the connection with thiophene at the 3- and 6-positions of carbazole gives rise to high electrochemical stability and effectively enhances donor ability, which should result from the effective resonance stabilization of the cationic species [51].The HOMO levels of the compound were estimated from the half-wave potential of the first oxidation relative to the ferrocene group. As the reduction peaks are out of our scan range, the LUMO levels were calculated by adding the optical bandgap to the HOMO levels. Table2 lists the values for the HOMO and LUMO levels. In the CV-experiments, the subsequent introduction of thiophene groups at the carbazole moieties in compoundsP1 (CBP),P4, andP7 causes decreases in the HOMO levels of −5.69, −5.70, and −5.72 eV, respectively. In the case of methyl substitution on the biphenyl ring in compoundsP2,P5, andP8, the HOMO levels decrease to −5.70, −5.89, and −5.85 eV, respectively, in comparison withP1,P4, andP7. However, by changing the biphenyl core to phenyl rings for compoundsP3,P6, andP9, the HOMO levels are significantly affected (−5.62, −5.94, and −5.99 eV, resp.).The HOMO levels ofP6 andP9 are the lowest amongst all the compounds, indicating that the introduction of thiophene and phenyl groups to the core leads to more stabilization of HOMO energy levels [52]. The order of the LUMO energies isP3 >P2 >P1 >P4 >P7 >P5 >P6 >P8 >P9, indicating that compoundsP8 andP9 possess greater electron-accepting abilities. A lower LUMO level suggests stronger intramolecular charge transfer interactions which result in a lower bandgap (Figure 6) [53].Δ
E values decrease significantly with the change of the bridging core group from biphenyl to dimethylbiphenyl or phenyl inP1–P3 andP7–P9, whereas Δ
E values inP4–P6 increase in the presence of monothiophene at the 3-position of carbazole. The HOMO-LUMO gap ofP9 is the narrowest among these nine compounds, which is expected to have the most outstanding photophysical properties. Therefore, the carbazole substituted with thiophene groups at the 3- and 6-positions and phenyl as the core group leads to greater stabilization of HOMO and LUMO energy levels where the bandgap (Δ
E) of all of the compounds is significantly reduced.These considerations show that the energy levels of the CBP derivatives can be fine-tuned to some extent by varying the substitution pattern at the connecting biphenyl moiety as well as at the pendant carbazole. Particularly, the HOMO levels can be varied. Thus, through these slight variations in the molecular structure, the energy of the different layers in optoelectronic devices can be adjusted to minimize energy barriers within the devices [41]. π-Functional small molecules benefit from the fact that they are easy to purify, tend to possess high intrinsic carrier mobilities, and are able to self-assemble to achieve long-range order. An impressive library of thiophene oligomers has been built and explored over the past two decades [54, 55]. Symmetrical donor-acceptor (DA) small molecules appended with solubilizing substituents and consisting of an electron-deficient core flanked with electron-rich groups are now being considered as alternatives to their all-donor counterparts [56].


### 2.4. Theoretical Approach

To obtain further insight into the electronic properties ofP1–P9, geometrical optimization and frontier molecular orbital calculations were performed. All of the computations were performed using the GAUSSIAN 09W software package (Tables S1–S9 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9360230). The images presented in the figures were generated using ChemDraw and GaussView visualization programs. The geometries of the compounds in their ground state were optimized (Figure 6) employing the Density Functional Theory (DFT) method with restricted Becke’s three parameter hybrid functional and the nonlocal Lee, Yang, and Parr gradient-corrected correlation functional B3LYP [57, 58] combined with the 6-31G functional basis set. This method has been found to be an accurate formalism for calculating the characteristic parameters of many molecular systems [59].The contour plots of the HOMO and LUMO determined at the DFT/B3LYP/6-31G level for all of the compounds are shown in Figure7. The HOMO is expected to lie on the electron-rich groups, affording an effective hole-transporting property. The energy of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals is an important molecularly correlated parameter. The molecules with lower HOMO orbital energy levels have weaker electron-donating abilities. Moreover, the electronic density distribution in these orbitals permits prediction of the most probable sites of attack by reactive agents in the molecules investigated.Figure 7
HOMO and LUMO frontier molecular orbitals of compoundsP1–P9 that were calculated in vacuo at B3LYP/6-31G level of approximation.From the HOMO and LUMO orbitals shown in Figure7, the HOMO is predominantly determined by the carbazole groups forP1–P3, whereas forP4–P7 the HOMO are mainly determined by the thiophene groups and their π-bonding orbitals, although the carbazoles also exert their influence; however, the LUMOs are predominantly localized on and primarily determined by the carbazole and biphenyl core groups and their π
∗-bonding orbitals. CompoundsP8 andP9 demonstrate an overlap between HOMO and LUMO on the acceptor carbazole group, which facilitates the charge transfer from the four electron-donating thiophene groups to the two electron-withdrawing carbazoles [53]. In addition to the stronger electron-donating ability of the thiophene, compoundsP7,P8, andP9 exhibit more planar structures and more effective π-conjugation, which result in strengthened intramolecular interactions and lower bandgaps. These results are consistent with the experimentally observed absorption properties of the resulting compound (Figure 3(c)). A clear difference between biphenyl and dimethylbiphenyl as core groups can be observed.In fact, for N-carbazole end-capped-π-conjugated molecules, the introduction of carbazole moieties at the terminal group of the conjugated backbone would result in a less planar molecule due to the planar character of carbazole groups. This fact is manifested by a perpendicular orientation to the backbone chain, which decreases the bond length between the core and the carbazole group. This decrease is attributed to the size and the electronegativity of the nitrogen atom. These large dihedral angles could minimize the degree of π-aggregation and thus improve the photoluminescence intensity [52]. Particularly, the 3,6-disubstituted structures present high dipole moments, indicating the presence of a significant charge transfer. This effect is more pronounced in the case of D-A structures (P4–P9) [52].


## 2.1. Synthesis

The synthesis of compoundsP1–P9 was described in three parts as outlined in Schemes 1 and 2. The key steps in the synthesis of the compounds involved Suzuki-Miyaura [37] and Ullmann coupling [38] reactions. The detailed procedures for the synthesis of the compound are described in Section 4.Scheme 1
Synthesis ofP4,P5, andP6. (i) I2 (0.5 eq), AcOH, and reflux. (ii) K2CO3, Pd(PPh3)4, EtOH, and reflux for 24 h. (iii) K2CO3, copper powder, 18-crown-6,o-DCB, and reflux.Scheme 2
Synthesis ofP7,P8, andP9. (i) I2 (1 eq), AcOH, and reflux. (ii) K2CO3, Pd(PPh3)4, EtOH, and reflux for 24 h. (iii) K2CO3, Cu, 18-crown-6,o-DCB, and reflux.The Ullmann coupling reaction was performed on carbazole (1) with either 4,4-diiodobiphenyl (2), 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl (3), or 1,4-diiodobenzene (4) to giveP1,P2, andP3 in 50%, 60%, and 80% yields, respectively. CompoundsP1 (CBP) [39, 40],P2 (CDBP) [41], andP3 (BCP) [39, 40] are known compounds.The syntheses of compoundsP4,P5, andP6 were achieved in three steps starting from carbazole (1) as described in Scheme 1. The first step involved iodination of1 using 0.5 eq of iodine to give 3-iodocarbzole (5). This was followed by Suzuki-Miyaura cross coupling of5 with thiophene-2-boronic acid pinacol ester (6) to produce monothienyl-substituted carbazole (7). Ullmann coupling of compound7 with compounds2,3, and4 afforded compoundsP4,P5, andP6 in 26%, 35%, and 48% yields, respectively.In a similar approach, compoundsP7,P8, andP9 were synthesized in three steps from compound1 as described in Scheme 2. Iodination of compound1 using 1 eq of iodine gave 3,6-diiodocarbazole (8), which was then refluxed with compound6 to give dithienyl-substituted carbazole (9). Ullmann coupling of9 with2,3, and4 gave compoundsP7,P8, andP9 in 75%, 60%, and 50% yields, respectively. All of the compounds were fully characterized by spectroscopic methods such as 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass spectroscopy.


## 2.2. Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy

The UV-Vis absorption spectra ofP1–P9 were measured in DMF solutions (Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c)), and the λ
m
a
x
a
b
s values for quantifying the extent of π-conjugation are summarized in Table 1. It is clearly observed from Figures 2(a)–2(c) that the maximum absorption peak shifts to a longer wavelength as the number of thiophene groups increases. The absorption bands of all of the compounds were gradually red-shifted, when the thiophene group was connected to the carbazole at the 3- and 6-positions and the extent of π-conjugation in the compounds increased, as expected. CompoundsP4,P5,P6,P7,P8, andP9 show the longest wavelength absorptions at 377, 373, 372, 390, 393, and 414 nm, respectively (Figure 2), which were considerably red-shifted in comparison to those of compoundsP1,P2, andP3. For compoundsP7,P8, andP9, we noted a maximum absorption wavelength at a higher absorbance, indicating that the attachment of thiophene groups at the 3- and 6-positions of the carbazole with a phenyl group core significantly enhances the optical properties (Figure 3(c)). Furthermore, the slight shift of wavelength for a fixed number of thiophene groups, bridging biphenyl groups, dimethylbiphenyl, and phenyl suggests that the differences in core groups in the compounds affect the optical properties. Noticeably, λ
m
a
x
a
b
s are not affected by the changes of core groups (Figures 3(a)–3(c)).Table 1
UV-Vis: spectroscopic data and fluorescence on 300 nm excitationa.
λ
m
a
x
a
b
s (nm)
λ
o
n
s
e
t (nm)
λ
e
m
c (nm)
P1 (CBP)
293, 317b, 340b
360
390
P2
293, 328b, 341b
353
351
P3
293, 326b, 340b
352
355
P4
301, 325b
377
413
P5
293b, 303, 322b
373
396
P6
294b, 303, 324b
372
394
P7
318, 344b
390
412
P8
313
393
410
P9
316
414
519
aMeasured in DMF. bPeak as shoulder. cWavelength of the intensity maxima of the fluorescence at 300 nm excitation at room temperature.Figure 2
Electronic absorption spectra of (a)P1,P4, andP7; (b)P2,P5, andP8; and (c)P3,P6, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 3
Electronic absorption spectra of (a)P1,P2, andP3; (b)P4,P5, andP6; and (c)P7,P8, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)It is well known thatπ-conjugated thiophene oligomers and polymers tend to π-stack because of the strong intermolecular interaction between π-electrons [27]. The difference in intermolecular π-π interaction for these compounds would account for the differences in the broadness of their UV-Vis absorption spectra, as shown in Figure 2. We also observe that the broadness increased slightly as the numbers of thiophene groups increased [44].It is well known thatπ-conjugated thiophene oligomers and polymers tend to π-stack due to the strong intermolecular interaction between π-electrons [27]. The difference of intermolecular π-π interaction for these compounds would account for their different broadness of UV-Vis absorption spectra, as shown in Figure 3. We also observe that the broadness increased slightly with the increasing number of thiophenes [44].All the compoundsP1–P9 are fluorescent. After the functionalization of the carbazole groups, the fluorescence maxima (λ
e
m) gradually red-shifted upon the addition of thiophene group, resulting in a significant red shift in the emission spectrum as shown in Figures 4(a)–4(c), and the spectral data are summarized in Table 1. The broad absorption band in the fluorescence spectra ofP4,P5,P6,P7,P8, andP9 suggest the contribution of a more rigid structure in the excited state, namely, the quinoid state, than the ground state [45]. In contrast to the absorption, we note that the emission ofP1 is red-shifted compared toP2 andP3, which is attributed to the planarization ofP1 after the transition state to the excited state. Such a geometric relaxation is not possible forP2 due to the bulkier side on the introduction of methyl group at core group (Figure 5(a)) [46]. Similarly,P4 is red-shifted compared toP5 andP6 (Figure 5(b)). As the attachment of thiophene at 3- and 6- on the carbazole forP7,P8, andP9, λ
e
m are not significantly affected by the change of core groups (Figure 5(c)).Figure 4
Emission spectra of (a)P1,P4, andP7; (b)P2,P5, andP8; and (c)P3,P6, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 5
Emission spectra of (a)P1,P2, andP3; (b)P4,P5, andP6; and (c)P7,P8, andP9 recorded in DMF at 30°C.
(a)
(b)
(c)Carbazole-thiophenes possess nonplanar structures in their ground state (S
0) and become almost planar in the lowest state (S
1) [47, 48]. This is expected because, with the addition of each thiophene group onP7,P8, andP9, these compounds are more conformationally flexible and thus produce a more diffuse spectrum [49]. The larger the number of π-electrons in a chromophore, the greater the shift to the red of the fluorescence and absorption spectra. Thus, the characteristics of a planar chromophore can be interpreted as being because, in this configuration, the number of functional π-electrons is a maximum [50].


## 2.3. Electrochemical Properties

To elucidate the effects of the degree of conjugation between the core, carbazole, and thiophene groups and the elongation of the molecular length on donor ability and electrochemical stability, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed in a conventional three-electrode cell using a platinum working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and a Ag/AgNO3 reference electrode. In particular, the oxidation processes forP1–P9 were investigated in a DMF solution containing 0.05 mol L−1 of n-Bu4NPF6 as a supporting electrolyte (Figure 6). The oxidation potential (E
p
a) and onset (E
o
n
s
e
t) versus Fc+/Fc (ferrocenium/ferrocene couple) are listed in Table 2.Table 2
Oxidation potential (E
p
a) and onset (E
o
n
s
e
t) by cyclic voltammetry in DMF (0.05 mol L−1 n-Bu4NPF6)a, and optical HOMO-LUMO gaps (Δ
E
o
p
t)b.
E
p
a (V)
E
o
n
s
e
t (V)
HOMOc (eV)
LUMOd (eV)
Δ
E
o
p
t
b (eV)
P1
+1.04
+0.89
-
5.69, -
5.63 [41]
-
2.25
3.44, 3.47 [41]
P2
+1.13
+0.90
-
5.70, -
5.64 [41]
-
2.18
3.52, 3.51 [41]
P3
+1.04
+0.82
-
5.62
-
2.09
3.53
P4
+1.16
+0.90
-
5.70
-
2.41
3.29
P5
+1.41
+1.09
-
5.89
-
2.56
3.33
P6
+1.44
+1.14
-
5.94
-
2.60
3.34
P7
+1.28
+0.92
-
5.72
-
2.54
3.18
P8
+1.38
+1.05
-
5.85
-
2.69
3.16
P9
+1.44
+1.19
-
5.99
-
2.99
3.00
aAll potentials are given versus the Fc+/Fc couple used as the external standard; the scan rate is 100 mV s−1. bThe values are obtained from UV/Vis absorption onset λ
o
n
s
e
t. cThe values are those deduced from the E
o
n
s
e
t values according to the following equation: HOMO = -
(
4.8
+
E
o
n
s
e
t
) eV [42, 43]. dEstimated from the HOMO values and the optical band gap Δ
E
o
p
t.Figure 6
Cyclic voltammogram (0.1 Vs−1) for (a) compoundsP1,P2, andP3; (b) compoundsP4,P5, andP6; and (c) compoundsP7,P8, andP9 with ferrocene as an external standard in DMF—0.05 M B
u
n
4
N
P
F
6.
(a)
(b)
(c)Noticeably,E
p
a values forP4–P9 (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)) are cathodically shifted compared to those forP1,P2, andP3 (Figure 6(a)) by the subsequent addition of thiophene molecules, demonstrating that the connection with thiophene at the 3- and 6-positions of carbazole gives rise to high electrochemical stability and effectively enhances donor ability, which should result from the effective resonance stabilization of the cationic species [51].The HOMO levels of the compound were estimated from the half-wave potential of the first oxidation relative to the ferrocene group. As the reduction peaks are out of our scan range, the LUMO levels were calculated by adding the optical bandgap to the HOMO levels. Table2 lists the values for the HOMO and LUMO levels. In the CV-experiments, the subsequent introduction of thiophene groups at the carbazole moieties in compoundsP1 (CBP),P4, andP7 causes decreases in the HOMO levels of −5.69, −5.70, and −5.72 eV, respectively. In the case of methyl substitution on the biphenyl ring in compoundsP2,P5, andP8, the HOMO levels decrease to −5.70, −5.89, and −5.85 eV, respectively, in comparison withP1,P4, andP7. However, by changing the biphenyl core to phenyl rings for compoundsP3,P6, andP9, the HOMO levels are significantly affected (−5.62, −5.94, and −5.99 eV, resp.).The HOMO levels ofP6 andP9 are the lowest amongst all the compounds, indicating that the introduction of thiophene and phenyl groups to the core leads to more stabilization of HOMO energy levels [52]. The order of the LUMO energies isP3 >P2 >P1 >P4 >P7 >P5 >P6 >P8 >P9, indicating that compoundsP8 andP9 possess greater electron-accepting abilities. A lower LUMO level suggests stronger intramolecular charge transfer interactions which result in a lower bandgap (Figure 6) [53].Δ
E values decrease significantly with the change of the bridging core group from biphenyl to dimethylbiphenyl or phenyl inP1–P3 andP7–P9, whereas Δ
E values inP4–P6 increase in the presence of monothiophene at the 3-position of carbazole. The HOMO-LUMO gap ofP9 is the narrowest among these nine compounds, which is expected to have the most outstanding photophysical properties. Therefore, the carbazole substituted with thiophene groups at the 3- and 6-positions and phenyl as the core group leads to greater stabilization of HOMO and LUMO energy levels where the bandgap (Δ
E) of all of the compounds is significantly reduced.These considerations show that the energy levels of the CBP derivatives can be fine-tuned to some extent by varying the substitution pattern at the connecting biphenyl moiety as well as at the pendant carbazole. Particularly, the HOMO levels can be varied. Thus, through these slight variations in the molecular structure, the energy of the different layers in optoelectronic devices can be adjusted to minimize energy barriers within the devices [41]. π-Functional small molecules benefit from the fact that they are easy to purify, tend to possess high intrinsic carrier mobilities, and are able to self-assemble to achieve long-range order. An impressive library of thiophene oligomers has been built and explored over the past two decades [54, 55]. Symmetrical donor-acceptor (DA) small molecules appended with solubilizing substituents and consisting of an electron-deficient core flanked with electron-rich groups are now being considered as alternatives to their all-donor counterparts [56].


## 2.4. Theoretical Approach

To obtain further insight into the electronic properties ofP1–P9, geometrical optimization and frontier molecular orbital calculations were performed. All of the computations were performed using the GAUSSIAN 09W software package (Tables S1–S9 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9360230). The images presented in the figures were generated using ChemDraw and GaussView visualization programs. The geometries of the compounds in their ground state were optimized (Figure 6) employing the Density Functional Theory (DFT) method with restricted Becke’s three parameter hybrid functional and the nonlocal Lee, Yang, and Parr gradient-corrected correlation functional B3LYP [57, 58] combined with the 6-31G functional basis set. This method has been found to be an accurate formalism for calculating the characteristic parameters of many molecular systems [59].The contour plots of the HOMO and LUMO determined at the DFT/B3LYP/6-31G level for all of the compounds are shown in Figure7. The HOMO is expected to lie on the electron-rich groups, affording an effective hole-transporting property. The energy of the HOMO and LUMO orbitals is an important molecularly correlated parameter. The molecules with lower HOMO orbital energy levels have weaker electron-donating abilities. Moreover, the electronic density distribution in these orbitals permits prediction of the most probable sites of attack by reactive agents in the molecules investigated.Figure 7
HOMO and LUMO frontier molecular orbitals of compoundsP1–P9 that were calculated in vacuo at B3LYP/6-31G level of approximation.From the HOMO and LUMO orbitals shown in Figure7, the HOMO is predominantly determined by the carbazole groups forP1–P3, whereas forP4–P7 the HOMO are mainly determined by the thiophene groups and their π-bonding orbitals, although the carbazoles also exert their influence; however, the LUMOs are predominantly localized on and primarily determined by the carbazole and biphenyl core groups and their π
∗-bonding orbitals. CompoundsP8 andP9 demonstrate an overlap between HOMO and LUMO on the acceptor carbazole group, which facilitates the charge transfer from the four electron-donating thiophene groups to the two electron-withdrawing carbazoles [53]. In addition to the stronger electron-donating ability of the thiophene, compoundsP7,P8, andP9 exhibit more planar structures and more effective π-conjugation, which result in strengthened intramolecular interactions and lower bandgaps. These results are consistent with the experimentally observed absorption properties of the resulting compound (Figure 3(c)). A clear difference between biphenyl and dimethylbiphenyl as core groups can be observed.In fact, for N-carbazole end-capped-π-conjugated molecules, the introduction of carbazole moieties at the terminal group of the conjugated backbone would result in a less planar molecule due to the planar character of carbazole groups. This fact is manifested by a perpendicular orientation to the backbone chain, which decreases the bond length between the core and the carbazole group. This decrease is attributed to the size and the electronegativity of the nitrogen atom. These large dihedral angles could minimize the degree of π-aggregation and thus improve the photoluminescence intensity [52]. Particularly, the 3,6-disubstituted structures present high dipole moments, indicating the presence of a significant charge transfer. This effect is more pronounced in the case of D-A structures (P4–P9) [52].


## 3. Conclusion

In conclusion, a series of carbazole-thiophene derivativesP4–P9 were prepared by means of Suzuki-Miyaura and Ullmann coupling reactions as key steps. The electronic structures were determined by UV-Vis, fluorescence spectral measurements, CV, and theoretical calculations. Based on this study, a clear picture about the effects of the structural variations of carbazole-thiophenes, the degree of conjugation, and the insertion of different core groups on their electronic and electrochemical properties emerges. The connection of carbazole-thiophene with a phenyl core and the addition of thiophene groups at the 3- and 6-positions resulted in a composite structure that exhibited a red shift in the emission spectrum. Carbazole connecting with more thiophenes and a phenyl core group leads to greater stabilization of the HOMO and LUMO energy levels where the bandgap (Δ
E) of all of the compound-based-compounds is significantly reduced. The present study provides valuable information for the design and synthesis of new carbazole-thiophene-based systems.


## 4. Experimental Section

### 4.1. General Information

All chemicals were commercially available and used as received unless otherwise specified.1H NMR (400 and 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded using a spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual solvent protons (1H) or the solvent carbon (13C) as internal standards. The mass spectra and high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using either electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) techniques, or MALDI-Tof. Absorption spectra were recorded on a UV-Vis spectrometer. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out using working electrode as glassy carbon, and counter electrode was platinum electrodes and Ag/Ag+ (0.10 M AgNO3 in DMF) as reference electrode. The electrochemical potential was calibrated against Fc/Fc+. Theoretical Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation was performed using GAUSSIAN 09W software package using the B3LYP method and 6-31G basis set.


### 4.2. Synthesis of Compounds

#### 4.2.1. Preparation of CompoundP1–P9

General procedure of Ullmann coupling procedure for preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of carbazole1, 3-(thiophen-2-yl)carbazole7 or 3,6-(dithiophene-2-yl)9H-carbazole9 (2 eq) and 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2, 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 or 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (1 eq) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene (10 mL) was purged with nitrogen for 30 minutes. K2CO3 (1 eq), copper powder (2 eq), and 18-crown-6 (20 mol%) were added to the mixture and the resulting mixture was refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere for 3 days. The organic phase was filtered and the solvent removed under vacuo and purified with column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate-hexane) to afford desired products.


#### 4.2.2. Preparation of Compounds7 and9

General procedure for the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling procedure for the preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of 3-iodocarbazole5 or 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 (1 eq) dissolved in 80 mL absolute ethanol was treated with a few drops of THF until the mixture completely dissolved and thiophene-2-boronic acid pinacol ester6 was added to the solution. K2CO3 (2 eq) in ethanol/water (10 : 1) was then added and purged with nitrogen for 30 min. Pd(PPh3)4 (ca 0.5–1%, per reaction point) was added to the mixture, and the resulting mixture was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduce pressure. Recrystallization from hexane-dichloromethane afforded the desired product.


#### 4.2.3. 4,4-Diiodobiphenyl (2) [60]

A mixture of biphenyl4 (4.62 g, 30 mmol), acetic acid 30 mL, water 3 mL, concentrated sulfuric acid 3 mL, iodine 8.37 g, periodic acid (3.75 g, 16.5 mmol), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 4 mL) was stirred and maintained at 80°C for 4 hours. Afterwards, the slurry product was cooled to room temperature, poured into water, and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined dark purple organic layer was decolorized with sodium sulfite, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to dryness yielding 3.99 g of2 pale yellow shiny powder (33%): mp 200–202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 200-201°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.78 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H) 7.30 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.6, 137.7, 128.7, 93.5. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C12H8I2 406.8795; found 406.8793. Anal. calcd. for C12H8I2: C, 35.50; H, 1.99; I, 62.51. Found: C, 35.45; H, 1.80; I, 62.43.


#### 4.2.4. 4,4′-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl (P1) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq carbazole1 (0.09 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.10 g, 0.25 mmol) as white shiny powderP1 (0.07 g, 50%). Mp 283. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.95 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.74 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (d, J
=
7.90 Hz, 4 H), 7.48 (td, J
=
7.10, 1.00 Hz, 4 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
6.80, 1.00 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 139.3, 137.3, 128.5, 127.5, 126.0, 123.5, 120.4, 120.1, 109.8. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C36H24N2 485.2017; found 485.2015. Anal. calcd. for C36H24N2: C, 89.23; H, 4.99; N, 5.78. Found: C, 89.20; H, 4.80; N, 5.72.


#### 4.2.5. 9,9′-(2,2′-Dimethyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (P2) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of carbazole1 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP2 as a white powder (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.55–7.60 (m, 6 H), 7.45–7.55 (m, 8 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H), 2.32 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.9, 140.0, 137.9, 136.9, 130.8, 128.3, 125.9, 124.3, 123.4, 120.3, 119.9, 109.9, 20.13. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H28N2 513.2330; found 513.2332. Anal. calcd. for C38H28N2: C, 89.03; H, 5.50; N, 5.46. Found: C, 89.00; H, 5.45; N, 5.43.


#### 4.2.6. 1,4-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)benzene (P3)

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq of carbazole1 (0.08 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP3 as a white solid (0.08 g, 80%). Mp 323°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.22 (d, J
=
7.58 Hz, 4 H), 7.85 (s, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.20 Hz, 4 H), 7.51 (td, J
=
7.67, 1.16 Hz, 4 H), 7.37 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 136.9, 128.4, 126.1, 123.6, 120.4, 120.3, 109.7. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C30H20N2 409.1704; found 409.1706. Anal. calcd. for C30H20N2: C, 88.21; H, 4.93; N, 6.86. Found: C, 88.18; H, 4.90; N, 6.79.


#### 4.2.7. 3-Iodocarbazole (5) [61]

Carbazole1 (16.7 g, 101 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (250 mL), and KI (11.73 g, 135 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol; the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 9.73 g (47%) of5 as a brown solid; mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 1 H), 8.11 (br. s., 1 H), 8.04 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 1 H), 7.68 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.22–7.28 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 139.5, 138.6, 134.1, 129.2, 126.6, 125.9, 122.1, 120.5, 119.9, 112.6, 110.7. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H8IN 292.970; found 292.971. Anal. calcd. for C12H8IN: C, 49.17; H, 2.75; I, 43.30; N, 4.78. Found: C, 49.10; H, 2.71; I, 43.25; N, 4.73.


#### 4.2.8. 3-(Thiophen-2-yl)carbazole (7) [62]

The title product was prepared from 3-iodocarbazole5 (2.4 g, 8.0 mmol) as an off-white solid (1.60 g, 80%) mp 196°C; m
p
l
i
t
. 197°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.32 (s, 1 H), 8.14 (d, J
=
7.79 Hz, 1 H), 8.10 (br. s., 1 H), 7.72 (d, J
=
8.34 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.50 (m, 4 H), 7.37 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 1 H), 7.13 (ddd, J
=
5.02, 3.55, 1.42 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.7, 140.0, 139.0, 128.0, 126.4, 126.2, 124.6, 123.8, 123.7, 123.3, 122.2, 120.5, 119.7, 117.9, 110.9, 110.8; HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C16H11NS 250.0692, found 250.0690. Anal. calcd. for C16H11NS: C, 77.11; H, 4.45; N, 5.62; S, 12.83. Found: C, 77.08; H, 4.40; N, 5.58; S, 12.79.


#### 4.2.9. Preparation ofP4

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.3241 g, 1.3 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.6 mmol) as an off-white solid (0.1 g, 26%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
8.31 Hz, 2 H), 7.97 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 4 H), 7.75 (dd, J
=
8.62, 3.12 Hz, 6 H), 7.50–7.58 (m, 5 H), 7.33–7.43 (m, 5 H), 7.31 (d, J
=
4.77 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (t, J
=
4.20 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C44H28N2S2 649.1772; found 649.1775. Anal. calcd. for C44H28N2S2: C, 81.47; H, 4.35; N, 4.32; S, 9.86. Found: C, 81.45; H, 4.32; N, 4.28; S, 9.82.


#### 4.2.10. Preparation ofP5

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.12 g, 0.48 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol) as a pale yellow solid (0.05 g, 35%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
7.46 Hz, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.60 (m, 12 H), 7.41 (dd, J
=
3.55, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.36 (td, J
=
7.43, 0.92 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (dd, J
=
5.14, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.55 Hz, 2 H), 2.33 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H32N2S2 677.2085; found 677.2080. Anal. calcd. for C46H32N2S2: C, 81.65; H, 4.77; N, 4.14; S, 9.45. Found: C, 81.62; H, 4.74; N, 4.10; S, 9.41.


#### 4.2.11. Preparation ofP6

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.16 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP6 as a pale yellow solid (0.08 g, 48%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.25 (d, J
=
7.52 Hz, 2 H), 7.87 (s, 4 H), 7.77 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (t, J
=
8.60 Hz, 4 H), 7.52 (td, J
=
7.50, 1.00 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J
=
6.97 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.04, 1.01 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.48 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 128.3, 128.1, 127.2, 126.5, 124.8, 124.1, 124.0, 123.5, 122.4, 120.6, 120.6, 118.0, 110.1, 109.9. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H24N2S2 573.1459; found 573.1484. Anal. calcd. for C38H24N2S2: C, 79.72; H, 4.22; N, 4.89; S, 11.17. Found: C, 79.69; H, 4.20; N, 4.86; S, 11.13.


#### 4.2.12. 3,6-Diiodocarbazole (8) [61]

Carbazole1 (12.23 g, 73 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (300 mL), and KI (15.84 g, 95 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was then boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 5.75 g of8 as a brown solid (18.79%): mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.34 (s, 2 H), 8.16 (br. s., 1 H), 7.70 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.63 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J
=
8.41 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 134.8, 129.4, 124.5, 112.7 and 82.5. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H7I2N 418.867; found 418.868. Anal. calcd. for C12H7I2N: C, 34.40; H, 1.68; I, 60.58; N, 3.34. Found: C, 34.38; H, 1.65; I, 60.55; N, 3.30.


#### 4.2.13. 3,6-Di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole (9)

The compound was prepared from 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 as a white solid (0.70 g, 59%): mp 127°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.35 (s, 2 H), 8.13 (br. s., 1 H), 7.73 (dd, J
=
8.39, 1.70 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
8.53 Hz, 2 H), 7.38 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (d, J
=
5.04 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (dd, J
=
10.36, 8.53 Hz, 1 H), 7.12–7.16 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 139.4, 128.0, 126.7, 124.9, 123.9, 123.8, 122.3, 118.0, 111.1. HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C20H13NS2 332.0569; found 332.0569. Anal. calcd. for C20H13NS2: C, 72.52; H, 3.95; N, 4.23; S, 19.30. Found: C, 72.49; H, 3.91; N, 4.19; S, 19.27.


#### 4.2.14. Preparation ofP7

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.43 g, 1.30 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.60 mmol). Recrystallization from absolute ethanol gaveP7 as a pale yellow solid (1.0 g, 75%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.44 (s, 4 H), 7.98 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 3 H), 7.76 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 8 H), 7.53 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.43 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 4 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.13, 0.92 Hz, 4 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.48 Hz, 5 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.3, 140.8, 139.4, 137.0, 128.7, 128.1, 127.3, 127.3, 125.0, 124.0, 123.9, 122.5, 118.0, 110.4. Mp 268°C. HR-APCI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C52H32N2S4 813.1526; found 813.1522. Anal. calcd. for C52H32N2S4: C, 76.85; H, 3.97; N, 3.45; S, 15.74. Found: C, 76.82; H, 3.95; N, 3.41; S, 15.70.


#### 4.2.15. Preparation ofP8

The compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP8 as a white solid (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.45 (s, 4 H), 7.69–7.83 (m, 6 H), 7.49–7.63 (m, 6 H), 7.37–7.49 (m, 6 H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.11–7.19 (m, 4 H), 1.28 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 145.4, 142.1, 141.8, 140.9, 128.1, 124.9, 124.2, 124.0, 123.9, 123.6, 122.4, 122.3, 118.0, 111.4, 110.4, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C54H36N2S4 841.1841; found 841.1842. Anal. calcd. for C54H36N2S4: C, 77.14; H, 4.32; N, 3.33; S, 15.21. Found: C, 77.12; H, 4.30; N, 3.29; S, 15.18.


#### 4.2.16. Preparation ofP9

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.21 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP9 as a pale yellow solid (0.1 g, 50%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.46 (s, 4 H), 7.90 (s, 4 H), 7.79 (dd, J
=
8.50, 1.65 Hz, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
3.55 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (d, J
=
4.52 Hz, 4 H), 7.17 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.61 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.2, 140.6, 129.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.5, 125.1, 124.1, 124.0, 122.6, 118.1, 110.3. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H28N2S4 737.1213; found 737.1210. Anal. calcd. for C46H28N2S4: C, 75.01; H, 3.83; N, 3.80; S, 17.36. Found: C, 74.99; H, 3.80; N, 3.77; S, 17.32.


## 4.1. General Information

All chemicals were commercially available and used as received unless otherwise specified.1H NMR (400 and 600 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded using a spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual solvent protons (1H) or the solvent carbon (13C) as internal standards. The mass spectra and high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were obtained using either electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) techniques, or MALDI-Tof. Absorption spectra were recorded on a UV-Vis spectrometer. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was carried out using working electrode as glassy carbon, and counter electrode was platinum electrodes and Ag/Ag+ (0.10 M AgNO3 in DMF) as reference electrode. The electrochemical potential was calibrated against Fc/Fc+. Theoretical Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation was performed using GAUSSIAN 09W software package using the B3LYP method and 6-31G basis set.


## 4.2. Synthesis of Compounds

### 4.2.1. Preparation of CompoundP1–P9

General procedure of Ullmann coupling procedure for preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of carbazole1, 3-(thiophen-2-yl)carbazole7 or 3,6-(dithiophene-2-yl)9H-carbazole9 (2 eq) and 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2, 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 or 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (1 eq) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene (10 mL) was purged with nitrogen for 30 minutes. K2CO3 (1 eq), copper powder (2 eq), and 18-crown-6 (20 mol%) were added to the mixture and the resulting mixture was refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere for 3 days. The organic phase was filtered and the solvent removed under vacuo and purified with column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate-hexane) to afford desired products.


### 4.2.2. Preparation of Compounds7 and9

General procedure for the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling procedure for the preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of 3-iodocarbazole5 or 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 (1 eq) dissolved in 80 mL absolute ethanol was treated with a few drops of THF until the mixture completely dissolved and thiophene-2-boronic acid pinacol ester6 was added to the solution. K2CO3 (2 eq) in ethanol/water (10 : 1) was then added and purged with nitrogen for 30 min. Pd(PPh3)4 (ca 0.5–1%, per reaction point) was added to the mixture, and the resulting mixture was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduce pressure. Recrystallization from hexane-dichloromethane afforded the desired product.


### 4.2.3. 4,4-Diiodobiphenyl (2) [60]

A mixture of biphenyl4 (4.62 g, 30 mmol), acetic acid 30 mL, water 3 mL, concentrated sulfuric acid 3 mL, iodine 8.37 g, periodic acid (3.75 g, 16.5 mmol), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 4 mL) was stirred and maintained at 80°C for 4 hours. Afterwards, the slurry product was cooled to room temperature, poured into water, and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined dark purple organic layer was decolorized with sodium sulfite, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to dryness yielding 3.99 g of2 pale yellow shiny powder (33%): mp 200–202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 200-201°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.78 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H) 7.30 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.6, 137.7, 128.7, 93.5. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C12H8I2 406.8795; found 406.8793. Anal. calcd. for C12H8I2: C, 35.50; H, 1.99; I, 62.51. Found: C, 35.45; H, 1.80; I, 62.43.


### 4.2.4. 4,4′-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl (P1) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq carbazole1 (0.09 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.10 g, 0.25 mmol) as white shiny powderP1 (0.07 g, 50%). Mp 283. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.95 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.74 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (d, J
=
7.90 Hz, 4 H), 7.48 (td, J
=
7.10, 1.00 Hz, 4 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
6.80, 1.00 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 139.3, 137.3, 128.5, 127.5, 126.0, 123.5, 120.4, 120.1, 109.8. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C36H24N2 485.2017; found 485.2015. Anal. calcd. for C36H24N2: C, 89.23; H, 4.99; N, 5.78. Found: C, 89.20; H, 4.80; N, 5.72.


### 4.2.5. 9,9′-(2,2′-Dimethyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (P2) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of carbazole1 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP2 as a white powder (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.55–7.60 (m, 6 H), 7.45–7.55 (m, 8 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H), 2.32 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.9, 140.0, 137.9, 136.9, 130.8, 128.3, 125.9, 124.3, 123.4, 120.3, 119.9, 109.9, 20.13. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H28N2 513.2330; found 513.2332. Anal. calcd. for C38H28N2: C, 89.03; H, 5.50; N, 5.46. Found: C, 89.00; H, 5.45; N, 5.43.


### 4.2.6. 1,4-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)benzene (P3)

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq of carbazole1 (0.08 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP3 as a white solid (0.08 g, 80%). Mp 323°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.22 (d, J
=
7.58 Hz, 4 H), 7.85 (s, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.20 Hz, 4 H), 7.51 (td, J
=
7.67, 1.16 Hz, 4 H), 7.37 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 136.9, 128.4, 126.1, 123.6, 120.4, 120.3, 109.7. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C30H20N2 409.1704; found 409.1706. Anal. calcd. for C30H20N2: C, 88.21; H, 4.93; N, 6.86. Found: C, 88.18; H, 4.90; N, 6.79.


### 4.2.7. 3-Iodocarbazole (5) [61]

Carbazole1 (16.7 g, 101 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (250 mL), and KI (11.73 g, 135 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol; the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 9.73 g (47%) of5 as a brown solid; mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 1 H), 8.11 (br. s., 1 H), 8.04 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 1 H), 7.68 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.22–7.28 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 139.5, 138.6, 134.1, 129.2, 126.6, 125.9, 122.1, 120.5, 119.9, 112.6, 110.7. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H8IN 292.970; found 292.971. Anal. calcd. for C12H8IN: C, 49.17; H, 2.75; I, 43.30; N, 4.78. Found: C, 49.10; H, 2.71; I, 43.25; N, 4.73.


### 4.2.8. 3-(Thiophen-2-yl)carbazole (7) [62]

The title product was prepared from 3-iodocarbazole5 (2.4 g, 8.0 mmol) as an off-white solid (1.60 g, 80%) mp 196°C; m
p
l
i
t
. 197°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.32 (s, 1 H), 8.14 (d, J
=
7.79 Hz, 1 H), 8.10 (br. s., 1 H), 7.72 (d, J
=
8.34 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.50 (m, 4 H), 7.37 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 1 H), 7.13 (ddd, J
=
5.02, 3.55, 1.42 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.7, 140.0, 139.0, 128.0, 126.4, 126.2, 124.6, 123.8, 123.7, 123.3, 122.2, 120.5, 119.7, 117.9, 110.9, 110.8; HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C16H11NS 250.0692, found 250.0690. Anal. calcd. for C16H11NS: C, 77.11; H, 4.45; N, 5.62; S, 12.83. Found: C, 77.08; H, 4.40; N, 5.58; S, 12.79.


### 4.2.9. Preparation ofP4

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.3241 g, 1.3 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.6 mmol) as an off-white solid (0.1 g, 26%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
8.31 Hz, 2 H), 7.97 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 4 H), 7.75 (dd, J
=
8.62, 3.12 Hz, 6 H), 7.50–7.58 (m, 5 H), 7.33–7.43 (m, 5 H), 7.31 (d, J
=
4.77 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (t, J
=
4.20 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C44H28N2S2 649.1772; found 649.1775. Anal. calcd. for C44H28N2S2: C, 81.47; H, 4.35; N, 4.32; S, 9.86. Found: C, 81.45; H, 4.32; N, 4.28; S, 9.82.


### 4.2.10. Preparation ofP5

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.12 g, 0.48 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol) as a pale yellow solid (0.05 g, 35%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
7.46 Hz, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.60 (m, 12 H), 7.41 (dd, J
=
3.55, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.36 (td, J
=
7.43, 0.92 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (dd, J
=
5.14, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.55 Hz, 2 H), 2.33 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H32N2S2 677.2085; found 677.2080. Anal. calcd. for C46H32N2S2: C, 81.65; H, 4.77; N, 4.14; S, 9.45. Found: C, 81.62; H, 4.74; N, 4.10; S, 9.41.


### 4.2.11. Preparation ofP6

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.16 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP6 as a pale yellow solid (0.08 g, 48%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.25 (d, J
=
7.52 Hz, 2 H), 7.87 (s, 4 H), 7.77 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (t, J
=
8.60 Hz, 4 H), 7.52 (td, J
=
7.50, 1.00 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J
=
6.97 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.04, 1.01 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.48 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 128.3, 128.1, 127.2, 126.5, 124.8, 124.1, 124.0, 123.5, 122.4, 120.6, 120.6, 118.0, 110.1, 109.9. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H24N2S2 573.1459; found 573.1484. Anal. calcd. for C38H24N2S2: C, 79.72; H, 4.22; N, 4.89; S, 11.17. Found: C, 79.69; H, 4.20; N, 4.86; S, 11.13.


### 4.2.12. 3,6-Diiodocarbazole (8) [61]

Carbazole1 (12.23 g, 73 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (300 mL), and KI (15.84 g, 95 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was then boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 5.75 g of8 as a brown solid (18.79%): mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.34 (s, 2 H), 8.16 (br. s., 1 H), 7.70 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.63 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J
=
8.41 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 134.8, 129.4, 124.5, 112.7 and 82.5. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H7I2N 418.867; found 418.868. Anal. calcd. for C12H7I2N: C, 34.40; H, 1.68; I, 60.58; N, 3.34. Found: C, 34.38; H, 1.65; I, 60.55; N, 3.30.


### 4.2.13. 3,6-Di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole (9)

The compound was prepared from 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 as a white solid (0.70 g, 59%): mp 127°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.35 (s, 2 H), 8.13 (br. s., 1 H), 7.73 (dd, J
=
8.39, 1.70 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
8.53 Hz, 2 H), 7.38 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (d, J
=
5.04 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (dd, J
=
10.36, 8.53 Hz, 1 H), 7.12–7.16 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 139.4, 128.0, 126.7, 124.9, 123.9, 123.8, 122.3, 118.0, 111.1. HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C20H13NS2 332.0569; found 332.0569. Anal. calcd. for C20H13NS2: C, 72.52; H, 3.95; N, 4.23; S, 19.30. Found: C, 72.49; H, 3.91; N, 4.19; S, 19.27.


### 4.2.14. Preparation ofP7

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.43 g, 1.30 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.60 mmol). Recrystallization from absolute ethanol gaveP7 as a pale yellow solid (1.0 g, 75%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.44 (s, 4 H), 7.98 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 3 H), 7.76 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 8 H), 7.53 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.43 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 4 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.13, 0.92 Hz, 4 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.48 Hz, 5 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.3, 140.8, 139.4, 137.0, 128.7, 128.1, 127.3, 127.3, 125.0, 124.0, 123.9, 122.5, 118.0, 110.4. Mp 268°C. HR-APCI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C52H32N2S4 813.1526; found 813.1522. Anal. calcd. for C52H32N2S4: C, 76.85; H, 3.97; N, 3.45; S, 15.74. Found: C, 76.82; H, 3.95; N, 3.41; S, 15.70.


### 4.2.15. Preparation ofP8

The compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP8 as a white solid (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.45 (s, 4 H), 7.69–7.83 (m, 6 H), 7.49–7.63 (m, 6 H), 7.37–7.49 (m, 6 H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.11–7.19 (m, 4 H), 1.28 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 145.4, 142.1, 141.8, 140.9, 128.1, 124.9, 124.2, 124.0, 123.9, 123.6, 122.4, 122.3, 118.0, 111.4, 110.4, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C54H36N2S4 841.1841; found 841.1842. Anal. calcd. for C54H36N2S4: C, 77.14; H, 4.32; N, 3.33; S, 15.21. Found: C, 77.12; H, 4.30; N, 3.29; S, 15.18.


### 4.2.16. Preparation ofP9

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.21 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP9 as a pale yellow solid (0.1 g, 50%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.46 (s, 4 H), 7.90 (s, 4 H), 7.79 (dd, J
=
8.50, 1.65 Hz, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
3.55 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (d, J
=
4.52 Hz, 4 H), 7.17 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.61 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.2, 140.6, 129.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.5, 125.1, 124.1, 124.0, 122.6, 118.1, 110.3. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H28N2S4 737.1213; found 737.1210. Anal. calcd. for C46H28N2S4: C, 75.01; H, 3.83; N, 3.80; S, 17.36. Found: C, 74.99; H, 3.80; N, 3.77; S, 17.32.


## 4.2.1. Preparation of CompoundP1–P9

General procedure of Ullmann coupling procedure for preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of carbazole1, 3-(thiophen-2-yl)carbazole7 or 3,6-(dithiophene-2-yl)9H-carbazole9 (2 eq) and 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2, 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 or 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (1 eq) in 1,2-dichlorobenzene (10 mL) was purged with nitrogen for 30 minutes. K2CO3 (1 eq), copper powder (2 eq), and 18-crown-6 (20 mol%) were added to the mixture and the resulting mixture was refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere for 3 days. The organic phase was filtered and the solvent removed under vacuo and purified with column chromatography (silica, ethyl acetate-hexane) to afford desired products.


## 4.2.2. Preparation of Compounds7 and9

General procedure for the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling procedure for the preparation of carbazole-thiophene is as follows. A mixture of 3-iodocarbazole5 or 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 (1 eq) dissolved in 80 mL absolute ethanol was treated with a few drops of THF until the mixture completely dissolved and thiophene-2-boronic acid pinacol ester6 was added to the solution. K2CO3 (2 eq) in ethanol/water (10 : 1) was then added and purged with nitrogen for 30 min. Pd(PPh3)4 (ca 0.5–1%, per reaction point) was added to the mixture, and the resulting mixture was refluxed under a nitrogen atmosphere. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phases were washed with water, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduce pressure. Recrystallization from hexane-dichloromethane afforded the desired product.


## 4.2.3. 4,4-Diiodobiphenyl (2) [60]

A mixture of biphenyl4 (4.62 g, 30 mmol), acetic acid 30 mL, water 3 mL, concentrated sulfuric acid 3 mL, iodine 8.37 g, periodic acid (3.75 g, 16.5 mmol), and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4, 4 mL) was stirred and maintained at 80°C for 4 hours. Afterwards, the slurry product was cooled to room temperature, poured into water, and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined dark purple organic layer was decolorized with sodium sulfite, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and evaporated to dryness yielding 3.99 g of2 pale yellow shiny powder (33%): mp 200–202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 200-201°C). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.78 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H) 7.30 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.6, 137.7, 128.7, 93.5. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C12H8I2 406.8795; found 406.8793. Anal. calcd. for C12H8I2: C, 35.50; H, 1.99; I, 62.51. Found: C, 35.45; H, 1.80; I, 62.43.


## 4.2.4. 4,4′-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)-1,1′-biphenyl (P1) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq carbazole1 (0.09 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.10 g, 0.25 mmol) as white shiny powderP1 (0.07 g, 50%). Mp 283. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.95 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.74 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 4 H), 7.55 (d, J
=
7.90 Hz, 4 H), 7.48 (td, J
=
7.10, 1.00 Hz, 4 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
6.80, 1.00 Hz, 4 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 139.3, 137.3, 128.5, 127.5, 126.0, 123.5, 120.4, 120.1, 109.8. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C36H24N2 485.2017; found 485.2015. Anal. calcd. for C36H24N2: C, 89.23; H, 4.99; N, 5.78. Found: C, 89.20; H, 4.80; N, 5.72.


## 4.2.5. 9,9′-(2,2′-Dimethyl-[1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole) (P2) [41]

The title compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of carbazole1 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP2 as a white powder (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.21 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 4 H), 7.55–7.60 (m, 6 H), 7.45–7.55 (m, 8 H), 7.35 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H), 2.32 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.9, 140.0, 137.9, 136.9, 130.8, 128.3, 125.9, 124.3, 123.4, 120.3, 119.9, 109.9, 20.13. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H28N2 513.2330; found 513.2332. Anal. calcd. for C38H28N2: C, 89.03; H, 5.50; N, 5.46. Found: C, 89.00; H, 5.45; N, 5.43.


## 4.2.6. 1,4-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)benzene (P3)

The title compound was prepared from 2 eq of carbazole1 (0.08 g, 0.50 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP3 as a white solid (0.08 g, 80%). Mp 323°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.22 (d, J
=
7.58 Hz, 4 H), 7.85 (s, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.20 Hz, 4 H), 7.51 (td, J
=
7.67, 1.16 Hz, 4 H), 7.37 (td, J
=
7.40, 0.98 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 140.8, 136.9, 128.4, 126.1, 123.6, 120.4, 120.3, 109.7. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C30H20N2 409.1704; found 409.1706. Anal. calcd. for C30H20N2: C, 88.21; H, 4.93; N, 6.86. Found: C, 88.18; H, 4.90; N, 6.79.


## 4.2.7. 3-Iodocarbazole (5) [61]

Carbazole1 (16.7 g, 101 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (250 mL), and KI (11.73 g, 135 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from ethanol; the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 9.73 g (47%) of5 as a brown solid; mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 1 H), 8.11 (br. s., 1 H), 8.04 (d, J
=
7.70 Hz, 1 H), 7.68 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.22–7.28 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 139.5, 138.6, 134.1, 129.2, 126.6, 125.9, 122.1, 120.5, 119.9, 112.6, 110.7. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H8IN 292.970; found 292.971. Anal. calcd. for C12H8IN: C, 49.17; H, 2.75; I, 43.30; N, 4.78. Found: C, 49.10; H, 2.71; I, 43.25; N, 4.73.


## 4.2.8. 3-(Thiophen-2-yl)carbazole (7) [62]

The title product was prepared from 3-iodocarbazole5 (2.4 g, 8.0 mmol) as an off-white solid (1.60 g, 80%) mp 196°C; m
p
l
i
t
. 197°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.32 (s, 1 H), 8.14 (d, J
=
7.79 Hz, 1 H), 8.10 (br. s., 1 H), 7.72 (d, J
=
8.34 Hz, 1 H), 7.42–7.50 (m, 4 H), 7.37 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 1 H), 7.29–7.33 (m, 1 H), 7.13 (ddd, J
=
5.02, 3.55, 1.42 Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.7, 140.0, 139.0, 128.0, 126.4, 126.2, 124.6, 123.8, 123.7, 123.3, 122.2, 120.5, 119.7, 117.9, 110.9, 110.8; HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C16H11NS 250.0692, found 250.0690. Anal. calcd. for C16H11NS: C, 77.11; H, 4.45; N, 5.62; S, 12.83. Found: C, 77.08; H, 4.40; N, 5.58; S, 12.79.


## 4.2.9. Preparation ofP4

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.3241 g, 1.3 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.6 mmol) as an off-white solid (0.1 g, 26%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.41 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
8.31 Hz, 2 H), 7.97 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 4 H), 7.75 (dd, J
=
8.62, 3.12 Hz, 6 H), 7.50–7.58 (m, 5 H), 7.33–7.43 (m, 5 H), 7.31 (d, J
=
4.77 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (t, J
=
4.20 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C44H28N2S2 649.1772; found 649.1775. Anal. calcd. for C44H28N2S2: C, 81.47; H, 4.35; N, 4.32; S, 9.86. Found: C, 81.45; H, 4.32; N, 4.28; S, 9.82.


## 4.2.10. Preparation ofP5

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.12 g, 0.48 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.23 mmol) as a pale yellow solid (0.05 g, 35%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.24 (d, J
=
7.46 Hz, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J
=
8.56 Hz, 2 H), 7.46–7.60 (m, 12 H), 7.41 (dd, J
=
3.55, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.36 (td, J
=
7.43, 0.92 Hz, 2 H), 7.31 (dd, J
=
5.14, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.55 Hz, 2 H), 2.33 (s, 6 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 141.4, 140.4, 140.1, 138.0, 136.7, 130.8, 128.3, 128.0, 126.8, 126.3, 124.6, 124.2, 123.9, 123.3, 122.3, 120.5, 120.2, 117.9, 110.3, 110.1, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H32N2S2 677.2085; found 677.2080. Anal. calcd. for C46H32N2S2: C, 81.65; H, 4.77; N, 4.14; S, 9.45. Found: C, 81.62; H, 4.74; N, 4.10; S, 9.41.


## 4.2.11. Preparation ofP6

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3-(thiophene-2-yl)-9H-carbazole7 (0.16 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP6 as a pale yellow solid (0.08 g, 48%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.42 (s, 2 H), 8.25 (d, J
=
7.52 Hz, 2 H), 7.87 (s, 4 H), 7.77 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.74 Hz, 2 H), 7.60 (t, J
=
8.60 Hz, 4 H), 7.52 (td, J
=
7.50, 1.00 Hz, 2 H), 7.42 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J
=
6.97 Hz, 2 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.04, 1.01 Hz, 2 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
5.14, 3.48 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 128.3, 128.1, 127.2, 126.5, 124.8, 124.1, 124.0, 123.5, 122.4, 120.6, 120.6, 118.0, 110.1, 109.9. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C38H24N2S2 573.1459; found 573.1484. Anal. calcd. for C38H24N2S2: C, 79.72; H, 4.22; N, 4.89; S, 11.17. Found: C, 79.69; H, 4.20; N, 4.86; S, 11.13.


## 4.2.12. 3,6-Diiodocarbazole (8) [61]

Carbazole1 (12.23 g, 73 mmol) was dissolved in boiling glacial acetic acid (300 mL), and KI (15.84 g, 95 mmol) was added. The solution was cooled, ground potassium iodate (23.42 g, 150 mmol) was added, and the mixture was then boiled until it acquired a clear straw-colored tint (10 min). The hot solution was decanted from the undissolved potassium iodate, and it was allowed to cool to 45°C. The faintly brown plates were rapidly filtered off and recrystallized from alcohol, and the solution was allowed to cool to 45°C and filtered, yielding 5.75 g of8 as a brown solid (18.79%): mp 202°C (m
p
l
i
t
. 202°C), 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.34 (s, 2 H), 8.16 (br. s., 1 H), 7.70 (dd, J
=
8.53, 1.63 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J
=
8.41 Hz, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 138.5, 134.8, 129.4, 124.5, 112.7 and 82.5. Maldi-Tof MS: m
/
z calcd for [M+] = C12H7I2N 418.867; found 418.868. Anal. calcd. for C12H7I2N: C, 34.40; H, 1.68; I, 60.58; N, 3.34. Found: C, 34.38; H, 1.65; I, 60.55; N, 3.30.


## 4.2.13. 3,6-Di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole (9)

The compound was prepared from 3,6-diiodocarbazole8 as a white solid (0.70 g, 59%): mp 127°C. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.35 (s, 2 H), 8.13 (br. s., 1 H), 7.73 (dd, J
=
8.39, 1.70 Hz, 2 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
8.53 Hz, 2 H), 7.38 (d, J
=
3.48 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (d, J
=
5.04 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (dd, J
=
10.36, 8.53 Hz, 1 H), 7.12–7.16 (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.5, 139.4, 128.0, 126.7, 124.9, 123.9, 123.8, 122.3, 118.0, 111.1. HR-ESI-MS m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C20H13NS2 332.0569; found 332.0569. Anal. calcd. for C20H13NS2: C, 72.52; H, 3.95; N, 4.23; S, 19.30. Found: C, 72.49; H, 3.91; N, 4.19; S, 19.27.


## 4.2.14. Preparation ofP7

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.43 g, 1.30 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodobiphenyl2 (0.25 g, 0.60 mmol). Recrystallization from absolute ethanol gaveP7 as a pale yellow solid (1.0 g, 75%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.44 (s, 4 H), 7.98 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 3 H), 7.76 (d, J
=
8.07 Hz, 8 H), 7.53 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.43 (dd, J
=
3.48, 1.10 Hz, 4 H), 7.32 (dd, J
=
5.13, 0.92 Hz, 4 H), 7.16 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.48 Hz, 5 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.3, 140.8, 139.4, 137.0, 128.7, 128.1, 127.3, 127.3, 125.0, 124.0, 123.9, 122.5, 118.0, 110.4. Mp 268°C. HR-APCI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C52H32N2S4 813.1526; found 813.1522. Anal. calcd. for C52H32N2S4: C, 76.85; H, 3.97; N, 3.45; S, 15.74. Found: C, 76.82; H, 3.95; N, 3.41; S, 15.70.


## 4.2.15. Preparation ofP8

The compound was prepared from 2.2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.17 g, 0.05 mmol) and 1 eq of 4,4-diiodo-2′2-dimethyl-1,1-biphenyl3 (0.10 g, 0.02 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, dichloromethane-hexane) gaveP8 as a white solid (0.01 g, 60%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.45 (s, 4 H), 7.69–7.83 (m, 6 H), 7.49–7.63 (m, 6 H), 7.37–7.49 (m, 6 H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 4 H), 7.11–7.19 (m, 4 H), 1.28 (s, 6 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.6, 145.4, 142.1, 141.8, 140.9, 128.1, 124.9, 124.2, 124.0, 123.9, 123.6, 122.4, 122.3, 118.0, 111.4, 110.4, 20.2. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C54H36N2S4 841.1841; found 841.1842. Anal. calcd. for C54H36N2S4: C, 77.14; H, 4.32; N, 3.33; S, 15.21. Found: C, 77.12; H, 4.30; N, 3.29; S, 15.18.


## 4.2.16. Preparation ofP9

The compound was prepared from 2 eq of 3,6-di(thiophen-2-yl)-9H-carbazole9 (0.21 g, 0.60 mmol) and 1 eq of 1,4-diiodobenzene4 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol). Purification by column chromatography (silica, chloroform-hexane) gaveP9 as a pale yellow solid (0.1 g, 50%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 8.46 (s, 4 H), 7.90 (s, 4 H), 7.79 (dd, J
=
8.50, 1.65 Hz, 4 H), 7.60 (d, J
=
8.44 Hz, 4 H), 7.44 (d, J
=
3.55 Hz, 4 H), 7.33 (d, J
=
4.52 Hz, 4 H), 7.17 (dd, J
=
4.95, 3.61 Hz, 4 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 145.2, 140.6, 129.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.5, 125.1, 124.1, 124.0, 122.6, 118.1, 110.3. HR-ESI-MS: m
/
z calcd for [M + H]+ = C46H28N2S4 737.1213; found 737.1210. Anal. calcd. for C46H28N2S4: C, 75.01; H, 3.83; N, 3.80; S, 17.36. Found: C, 74.99; H, 3.80; N, 3.77; S, 17.32.



---

*Source: 9360230-2016-05-10.xml*