# A Systematic Review ofIn Vitro Activity of Medicinal Plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp.

Authors: Delfina Fernandes Hlashwayo; Filomena Barbosa; Sílvia Langa; Betuel Sigaúque; Custódio Gabriel Bila
Journal: Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 (2020)

---

## Abstract

Introduction. Campylobacter spp. are zoonotic bacteria that cause gastroenteritis in humans and may cause extraintestinal infections such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, reactive arthritis, and bacteremia. Resistance to antibiotics is an increasing concern in the Sub-Saharan Africa; thus, search for alternatives such as plant-based active ingredients is important in order to develop new drugs. Objectives. To present a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies of the antibacterial activity of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. Methodology. Studies published until March 2020 on medicinal plants used against Campylobacter spp. from each country of Sub-Saharan Africa were searched on PubMed, Science Direct, AJOL, and Google Scholar. Articles were selected based on the existence of information regarding in vitro and in vivo activity of medicinal plants against Campylobacter spp. Results. A total of 47 medicinal plants belonging to 28 families were studied for in vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. No plant was studied in vivo. Plants from Fabaceae family were the most commonly studied. The plants with the strongest antimicrobial activities were Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and Terminalia macroptera. The root extracts from these plants were effective, and both had a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 25 μg/ml. Seven pure compounds were isolated and analyzed for activity against Campylobacter spp. The compound cryptolepine from C. sanguinolenta was the most effective with MIC values ranging between 6.25 and 25 μg/ml. Conclusion. Several native plants from the Sub-Saharan Africa region were studied for in vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. Some plants seemed very effective against the bacteria. Chemical compounds from three plants have been isolated and analyzed, but further studies are needed in order to produce new and effective drugs.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Campylobacter spp. are a group of zoonotic bacteria among the leading causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis. They account for 5% to 14% of all diarrheal diseases in the world [1, 2]. In humans, Campylobacter jejuni and less often C. coli cause watery or bloody diarrhea, fever, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Enteritis caused by these bacteria is sporadic and self-limiting. However, complications such as bacteremia, hepatitis, pancreatitis, lung infections, brain abscesses, meningitis, and reactive arthritis may occur, and immunocompromised individuals are at higher risk [3–5].Campylobacter spp. are gram-negative, mobile, and non-spore-forming bacteria. They colonize the gastrointestinal tract of various host species as commensals such as birds and ruminants, including cattle, sheep, and goats [5, 6]. The bacteria can also cause diarrhea in these animals [7]. Nevertheless, bacteria from this genus are the cause of miscarriages and infertility in ruminants [8].The widespread ofCampylobacter spp. in Sub-Saharan Africa may be explained by poor hygiene and lack of sanitation. Additionally, direct contact between people and animals and ingestion of contaminated food and water are some of the sources of Campylobacter spp. contamination [9].Antibiotics may be considered for treatment ofCampylobacter spp. infections in severe cases [1]. The commonly used drugs to treat campylobacteriosis in humans are erythromycin, fluoroquinolones, or tetracycline [10]. Although this antimicrobial treatment is generally not necessary, misuse of antibiotics is common in Sub-Saharan Africa and this is leading to increasing antibiotic resistance [10–13].Recently published systematic reviews reported antibiotic resistance ofCampylobacter spp. isolates from Sub-Saharan Africa to drugs used for clinical treatment of campylobacteriosis in severe cases, such as erythromycin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin [7, 13]. This drug resistance is a major global public health concern that leads to treatment failure.Campylobacter spp. are on the World Health Organization (WHO) list of global priority pathogens for research and development of new antibiotics [14]. Several antibiotics are no longer effective in the clinical treatment of campylobacteriosis, so new antibiotics and novel treatment schemes are needed [15]. In this context, medicinal plants are promising in isolating candidate molecules for new drugs [16], since phytochemicals are a major source of bioactive compounds with potent antimicrobial activities [17].Medicinal plants have been used for a long time for treatment of several diseases. This knowledge has been passed through generations [18]. About 88% of the population in the African region was reported to be using traditional and complementary medicines (T&CM) for healthcare as of 2018 [19], which includes plant-based therapies.Natural products, including the ones from plants, have been the main source of drugs, including antimicrobial agents. Moreover, currently many medicinal plant extracts are used as prescription drugs in developed countries [18].One of the objectives of the WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy 2014–2023 is to promote universal health coverage by integrating T&CM services into health service delivery and self-healthcare by capitalizing on their potential contribution to improve health services and health outcomes [20]. This systematic review provides useful data on effective plants for treatment of campylobacteriosis in severe cases, as well as candidate compounds for new and more effective antibiotics, contributing to the above described WHO objective.Ethnobotanical information from Sub-Saharan Africa regarding the plants used for treatment of diarrhea is available for many countries. As a result of these studies,in vitro studies were conducted in order to analyze the antimicrobial effect of these plants or phytochemical compounds against Campylobacter spp.The antimicrobial activity of a plant extract or of an antibiotic can be determined by disk diffusion method, where the active compound is diffused into an agar plate of microorganisms by a disk or by wells [21]. However, the best way to express the antibacterial activity of a compound or an extract is the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). It is the lowest concentration of a substance that inhibits the growth of a microbe by broth microdilution method [21]. For this reason, the plants extracts and compounds with strongest antibacterial activities were defined by their MIC values in this review.It is important that Sub-Saharan African countries start to use local resources for the development of drugs. Therefore, this work intends to analyze thein vitro and in vivo studies of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. in order to identify effective extracts and chemical compounds against the bacteria that may be the subject of further studies for development of new drugs. To our knowledge, there is no systematized data for in vitro or in vivo activity of medicinal plants against this pathogen. Thus, this review is a pilot research that may direct future research to identify drug candidate molecules in Sub-Saharan African flora.


## 2. Material and Methods

### 2.1. Search Strategy

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to find data available for medicinal plants from each country of Sub-Saharan Africa used againstCampylobacter spp. The following keywords were used: campylobacteriosis, Campylobacter, and medicinal plant, along with the names of each country from Sub-Saharan Africa. The UN macro-geographical definition of Africa was used to define the geographical boundaries of this review (https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/). The detailed search strategy is found in Supplementary Material 1.PubMed, Google Scholar, African Journals Online, and Science Direct were searched for studies published up to 12 March 2020 without language and time restrictions. Studies evaluating thein vitro activity of medicinal plants against the bacteria were included. No in vivo studies were found.Titles and abstracts were screened for location and correlation with the research objectives. Full versions of potentially relevant articles were obtained to assess eligibility. These were then independently evaluated for inclusion.


### 2.2. Data Extraction

Data regarding scientific names of plants, botanical family, plant parts, country of plant origin, type of extracts, isolated compounds, inhibition diameter in millimeters (mm), MIC, and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) inμg/ml were collected independently from each publication and captured using a standardized Word document form. The scientific names of the plants were checked with http://www.theplantlist.org. Botanical families follow APG IV system [22].


## 2.1. Search Strategy

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to find data available for medicinal plants from each country of Sub-Saharan Africa used againstCampylobacter spp. The following keywords were used: campylobacteriosis, Campylobacter, and medicinal plant, along with the names of each country from Sub-Saharan Africa. The UN macro-geographical definition of Africa was used to define the geographical boundaries of this review (https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/). The detailed search strategy is found in Supplementary Material 1.PubMed, Google Scholar, African Journals Online, and Science Direct were searched for studies published up to 12 March 2020 without language and time restrictions. Studies evaluating thein vitro activity of medicinal plants against the bacteria were included. No in vivo studies were found.Titles and abstracts were screened for location and correlation with the research objectives. Full versions of potentially relevant articles were obtained to assess eligibility. These were then independently evaluated for inclusion.


## 2.2. Data Extraction

Data regarding scientific names of plants, botanical family, plant parts, country of plant origin, type of extracts, isolated compounds, inhibition diameter in millimeters (mm), MIC, and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) inμg/ml were collected independently from each publication and captured using a standardized Word document form. The scientific names of the plants were checked with http://www.theplantlist.org. Botanical families follow APG IV system [22].


## 3. Results

### 3.1. Database Search Results

A total of 1065 articles were found from the initial database search, and three were found through other sources (Figure1). After removing the duplicates (n = 186), 855 studies were excluded based on title and abstract. Twenty-seven full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 13 were excluded. A total of 14 studies about the in vitro antibacterial activity of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. were found [23–36]. The majority of studies were from Nigeria (5 studies), South Africa (4), and Guinea-Bissau (3). Other countries included Democratic Republic of Congo (1) and Cameroon (1) (Figure 2). However, South Africa tested the highest number of plants (n = 30), while Cameroon had only one plant tested. The included articles were published between 1994 and 2019 (Figure 3).Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.Figure 2
Distribution and number of included studies by country of plant origin. Map made throughhttps://mapchart.net/africa.html.Figure 3
Distribution of studies by year of publication.


### 3.2. Results of theIn Vitro Studies

A total of 47 medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa were studied forin vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. These plants belong to 28 families. Plants from Fabaceae family were the most common with 11 species. Other botanical families were Menispermaceae and Combretaceae (each with 3 species); Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Asteraceae, Moraceae, and Vitaceae (each with 2 species); Anacardiaceae, Apiaceae, Celastraceae, Connaraceae, Cucurbitaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Gunneraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Iridaceae, Lamiaceae, Loranthaceae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae, Olacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Rubiaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Urticaceae, and Verbenaceae (each with 1 specie).Two plants, namely,Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and Peltophorum africanum, were analyzed in more than one research.The most analyzed plant parts were leaves, bark (from stem and root), and roots as shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Frequency of analyzed plant parts.Acetone, water, and methanol were the most used solvents for plant extract preparation, while chloroform, butanol, and dichloromethane were less used (Figure5).Figure 5
Frequency solvents used for plant extracts.Nine studies tested the antimicrobial activity forCampylobacter spp. through the MIC [23, 24, 26, 29–31, 33–35], while five studies tested only through disk diffusion method [25, 27, 28, 32, 36]. Table 1 provides a summary of the studied plant extracts, plant parts, isolated compounds, diameter of inhibition, MIC, and MBC of the tested plants.Table 1
Detailed information about thein vitro studies of plants from Sub-Saharan Africa tested for activity against Campylobacter spp.
PlantFamilyCountry of plant originPartType of extract (compound)Inhibition zone (mm)MIC (μg/ml)MBC (μg/ml)ReferencesAcacia caffra (Thunb.) Willd.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBark70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3130 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—6250 (Cj)—Aq—6250 (Cj)—Acacia nilotica (L.) DelileFabaceaeNigeriaLeavesEtOH6a(Cj, Cc, Cl)80000 (Cj, Cc, Cl)—[24]Aq2a(Cj, Cc, Cl)250000 (Cj, Cc, Cl)—Albertisia villosa (Exell) FormanMenispermaceaeDemocratic Republic of Congo (DRC)RootEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—62.5 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—62.5 (Cj, Cc)—Alepidea amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh.ApiaceaeSouth AfricaWhole70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—1560 (Cj)—Annickia chlorantha (Oliv.) Setten & MaasAnnonaceaeCameroonStem barkAq30b(Cj/c)390 (Cj/c)1560 (Cj/c)[31]Annona sp.AnnonaceaeSouth AfricaFruitAct—750 (Csp)—[33]EA—6000 (Csp)—Hex—350 (Csp)—Bauhinia galpinii N.E.Br.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—750 (Csp)—[33]Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill.PhyllanthaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—3000 (Csp)—[33]RootMeOH—3000 (Csp)—SeedAct—750 (Csp)—Carissa spinarum L.ApocynaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—1500 (Csp)—[33]Cassine transvaalensis (Burtt Davy) CoddCelastraceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]Cissampelos torulosa E.Mey. ex Harv. & Sond.MenispermaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]Cissus rubiginosa (Welw. ex Baker) Planch.VitaceaeDRCStem barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj), 500 (Cc)—Aq—250 (Cj) 125 (Cc)—Combretum kraussii Hochst.CombretaceaeSouth AfricaLeaves and bark70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Combretum woodii DümmerCombretaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct and EtOH—40 (Cj)—[26]Croton mubango Müll.Arg.EuphorbiaceaeDRCStem barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—1000 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schltr.ApocynaceaeGuinea-Bissau (plant bought there)RootEtOH (cryptolepine)—6.25c, 12.5d(Cj) 12.5c, 25d(Cc)—[30]RootEtOH—25c, 100d(Cj, Cc)—RootAq—200c, 400d(Cj) 400c, >400d(Cc)—RootEtOH29 (Cj) 34 (Cc)——[27]Elephantorrhiza burkei Benth.FabaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—390 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3130 (Cj)—Eriosema cordatum E.Mey.FabaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—>12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Ficus natalensis Hochst.MoraceaeNigeriaNRHexR (Cj)——[36]EAR (Cj)——MeOHR (Cj)——Ficus sycomorus L.MoraceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—350 (Csp)—[33]Gardenia ternifolia Schumach. & Thonn. subsp., jovis-tonantis var. goetzei (Stapf and Hutch.) Verdc.RubiaceaeGuinea-BissauRootAq9 (Cj) 10 (Cc)——[27]Gunnera perpensa L.GunneraceaeSouth AfricaRhizome70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—780 (Cj)—Gymnanthemum glaberrimum (Welw. ex O.Hoffm.) H.Rob.AsteraceaeNigeriaLeavesHex0 (Cf)——[28]CF0 (Cf)——EA0 (Cf)——BuOH0 (Cf)——Hypoxis obtusa Burch. ex Ker Gawl.HypoxidaceaeSouth AfricaCorm70% Act—1560 (Cj)—[35]Aq—780 (Cj)—Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng.VerbenaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesMeOH—90 (Csp)—[33]LeavesAct—90 (Csp)—LeavesEssential oil—1500 (Csp)—Mimusops obovata Sond.SapotaceaeSouth AfricaBark70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Momordica balsamina L.CucurbitaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—350 (Csp)—[33]LeavesHex—3000 (Csp)—Mucuna coriacea BakerFabaceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—3000 (Csp)—[33]Peltophorum africanum Sond.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—1500 (Csp)—[33]Bark70% Act—780 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3125 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—390 (Cj)—Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Pouzolzia mixta SolmsUrticaceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]StemMeOH—750 (Csp)—LeavesMeOH—3000 (Csp)—RootAq—6000 (Csp)—Pterocarpus angolensis DC.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—1500 (Csp)—[33]BarkAct—750 (Csp)—BarkDCM—750 (Csp)—BarkEA—90 (Csp)—BarkHex—1500 (Csp)—BarkCF—750 (Csp)—Pterocarpus santalinoides DC.FabaceaeNigeriaLeavesEA (friedelan-3-one)R (Cj)——[32]Quassia africana (Baill.) Baill.SimaroubaceaeDRCRoot barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—1000 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—Rhoicissus tridentata (L.f.) Wild and R.B. Drumm.VitaceaeSouth AfricaTuberAct—750 (Csp)—[33]FruitMeOH—350 (Csp)—FruitAct—180 (Csp)—Rourea obliquifoliolata GilgConnaraceaeDRCRootEt2O—500 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—[29]MeOH—500 (Cj) 125 (Cc)—Aq—125 (Cj), 250 (Cc)—Searsia chirindensis (Baker f.) MoffettAnacardiaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesCrude (MeOH)—780 (Cj)—[34]DCM—6250 (Cj)—EA—780 (Cj)—BuOH—3125 (Cj)—EA (methyl gallate)—60 (Cj)—EA (myricetin-3-O-arabinopyranoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (kaempferol-3-O- rhamnoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (quercetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside)—250 (Cj)—Senna podocarpa (Guill. & Perr.) LockFabaceaeGuinea-BissauRootEtOH8 (Cj) 9 (Cc)——[27]LeavesEtOH10 (Cj) 14 (Cc)——[27]Sida spinosa L.MalvaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—750 (Csp)—[33]Stephania abyssinica (Quart.-Dill. & A.Rich.) Walp.MenispermaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Syzygium cordatum Hochst. ex KraussMyrtaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—350 (Csp)—[33]BarkAct—180 (Csp)—LeavesMeOH—3000 (Csp)—LeavesAct—750 (Csp)—Tapinanthus globiferus (A.Rich.) Tiegh.LoranthaceaeNigeriaStemHexR (Cj)——[25]EAR (Cj)——MeOHR (Cj)——Terminalia macroptera Guill. & Perr.CombretaceaeGuinea-BissauRootEtOH—25c, 50d(Csp)—[23]Watsonia densiflora BakerIridaceaeSouth AfricaBulb70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Vitex doniana SweetLamiaceaeNigeriaBarkEtOH1a(Cj, Cc, Cl)NIE (Cj, Cc, Cl)—[24]Aq0a(Cj, Cc, Cl)NIE (Cj, Cc, Cl)—Vernonia amygdalina DelileAsteraceaeDRCLeavesEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—Ximenia caffra Sond.OlacaceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—350 (Csp)—[33]LeavesAct—750 (Csp)—Zornia milneana Mohlenbr.FabaceaeSouth AfricaWholeMeOH—180 (Csp)—[33]WholeAct—180 (Csp)—aZone of inhibition at 2 mg of the extract; bzone of inhibition at 12 mg of the extract; cMIC 50%; dMIC 90%; Csp: Campylobacter spp., Cc: C. coli, Cj: C. jejuni, Cj/c: C. jejuni/C. coli, Cl: C. lari, Cf: C. fetus, EtOH: ethanol; MeOH: methanol, Aq: aqueous, Et2O: diethyl ether, DCM: dichloromethane, EA: ethyl acetate, BuOH: butanol, Act: acetone, Hex: hexane, R: resistant, CF: chloroform, NIE: no inhibitory effect, NR: not reported.Most of the plants extracts were studied for activity againstC. jejuni (n = 27), followed by Campylobacter spp. (n = 20), C. coli (n = 11), C. lari (n = 2), and C. fetus (n = 1).The plants with the greatest antimicrobial activities wereCryptolepis sanguinolenta and Terminalia macroptera, in which both ethanolic extracts of the roots presented MIC = 25 μg/ml against C. jejuni and Campylobacter spp., respectively. The other plants with high antimicrobial activities were Combretum woodii (MIC = 40 for C. jejuni), Albertisia villosa (MIC = 62.5 for C. jejuni and C. coli), and Lippia javanica and Pterocarpus angolensis (both with a MIC = 90 for Campylobacter spp.).A total of seven pure compounds were isolated from 3 plants and tested againstCampylobacter spp. Cryptolepine, an alkaloid isolated from the ethanolic extract of C. sanguinolenta root, was the most effective compound with MIC ranging between 6.25 and 25 μg/ml for C. jejuni and C. coli [30]. Methyl gallate from the ethyl acetate extract of Searsia chirindensis leaf presented a MIC of 60 μg/ml against C. jejuni and was very effective as well [34]. Other four compounds were isolated from this plant extract, namely, myricetin-3-O-arabinopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside, kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside, and quercetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside with MICs ranging between 130 and 250 μg/ml [34]. However, friedelan-3-one, a terpenoid isolated from the ethyl acetate extract of Pterocarpus santalinoides leaf, was not effective against C. jejuni [32].Noin vivo studies of plants from the Sub-Saharan African region were found.


## 3.1. Database Search Results

A total of 1065 articles were found from the initial database search, and three were found through other sources (Figure1). After removing the duplicates (n = 186), 855 studies were excluded based on title and abstract. Twenty-seven full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, from which 13 were excluded. A total of 14 studies about the in vitro antibacterial activity of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. were found [23–36]. The majority of studies were from Nigeria (5 studies), South Africa (4), and Guinea-Bissau (3). Other countries included Democratic Republic of Congo (1) and Cameroon (1) (Figure 2). However, South Africa tested the highest number of plants (n = 30), while Cameroon had only one plant tested. The included articles were published between 1994 and 2019 (Figure 3).Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.Figure 2
Distribution and number of included studies by country of plant origin. Map made throughhttps://mapchart.net/africa.html.Figure 3
Distribution of studies by year of publication.


## 3.2. Results of theIn Vitro Studies

A total of 47 medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa were studied forin vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. These plants belong to 28 families. Plants from Fabaceae family were the most common with 11 species. Other botanical families were Menispermaceae and Combretaceae (each with 3 species); Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, Asteraceae, Moraceae, and Vitaceae (each with 2 species); Anacardiaceae, Apiaceae, Celastraceae, Connaraceae, Cucurbitaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Gunneraceae, Hypoxidaceae, Iridaceae, Lamiaceae, Loranthaceae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae, Olacaceae, Phyllanthaceae, Rubiaceae, Sapotaceae, Simaroubaceae, Urticaceae, and Verbenaceae (each with 1 specie).Two plants, namely,Cryptolepis sanguinolenta and Peltophorum africanum, were analyzed in more than one research.The most analyzed plant parts were leaves, bark (from stem and root), and roots as shown in Figure4.Figure 4
Frequency of analyzed plant parts.Acetone, water, and methanol were the most used solvents for plant extract preparation, while chloroform, butanol, and dichloromethane were less used (Figure5).Figure 5
Frequency solvents used for plant extracts.Nine studies tested the antimicrobial activity forCampylobacter spp. through the MIC [23, 24, 26, 29–31, 33–35], while five studies tested only through disk diffusion method [25, 27, 28, 32, 36]. Table 1 provides a summary of the studied plant extracts, plant parts, isolated compounds, diameter of inhibition, MIC, and MBC of the tested plants.Table 1
Detailed information about thein vitro studies of plants from Sub-Saharan Africa tested for activity against Campylobacter spp.
PlantFamilyCountry of plant originPartType of extract (compound)Inhibition zone (mm)MIC (μg/ml)MBC (μg/ml)ReferencesAcacia caffra (Thunb.) Willd.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBark70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3130 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—6250 (Cj)—Aq—6250 (Cj)—Acacia nilotica (L.) DelileFabaceaeNigeriaLeavesEtOH6a(Cj, Cc, Cl)80000 (Cj, Cc, Cl)—[24]Aq2a(Cj, Cc, Cl)250000 (Cj, Cc, Cl)—Albertisia villosa (Exell) FormanMenispermaceaeDemocratic Republic of Congo (DRC)RootEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—62.5 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—62.5 (Cj, Cc)—Alepidea amatymbica Eckl. & Zeyh.ApiaceaeSouth AfricaWhole70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—1560 (Cj)—Annickia chlorantha (Oliv.) Setten & MaasAnnonaceaeCameroonStem barkAq30b(Cj/c)390 (Cj/c)1560 (Cj/c)[31]Annona sp.AnnonaceaeSouth AfricaFruitAct—750 (Csp)—[33]EA—6000 (Csp)—Hex—350 (Csp)—Bauhinia galpinii N.E.Br.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—750 (Csp)—[33]Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill.PhyllanthaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—3000 (Csp)—[33]RootMeOH—3000 (Csp)—SeedAct—750 (Csp)—Carissa spinarum L.ApocynaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—1500 (Csp)—[33]Cassine transvaalensis (Burtt Davy) CoddCelastraceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]Cissampelos torulosa E.Mey. ex Harv. & Sond.MenispermaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]Cissus rubiginosa (Welw. ex Baker) Planch.VitaceaeDRCStem barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj), 500 (Cc)—Aq—250 (Cj) 125 (Cc)—Combretum kraussii Hochst.CombretaceaeSouth AfricaLeaves and bark70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Combretum woodii DümmerCombretaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct and EtOH—40 (Cj)—[26]Croton mubango Müll.Arg.EuphorbiaceaeDRCStem barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—1000 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Lindl.) Schltr.ApocynaceaeGuinea-Bissau (plant bought there)RootEtOH (cryptolepine)—6.25c, 12.5d(Cj) 12.5c, 25d(Cc)—[30]RootEtOH—25c, 100d(Cj, Cc)—RootAq—200c, 400d(Cj) 400c, >400d(Cc)—RootEtOH29 (Cj) 34 (Cc)——[27]Elephantorrhiza burkei Benth.FabaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—390 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3130 (Cj)—Eriosema cordatum E.Mey.FabaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—>12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Ficus natalensis Hochst.MoraceaeNigeriaNRHexR (Cj)——[36]EAR (Cj)——MeOHR (Cj)——Ficus sycomorus L.MoraceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—350 (Csp)—[33]Gardenia ternifolia Schumach. & Thonn. subsp., jovis-tonantis var. goetzei (Stapf and Hutch.) Verdc.RubiaceaeGuinea-BissauRootAq9 (Cj) 10 (Cc)——[27]Gunnera perpensa L.GunneraceaeSouth AfricaRhizome70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—780 (Cj)—Gymnanthemum glaberrimum (Welw. ex O.Hoffm.) H.Rob.AsteraceaeNigeriaLeavesHex0 (Cf)——[28]CF0 (Cf)——EA0 (Cf)——BuOH0 (Cf)——Hypoxis obtusa Burch. ex Ker Gawl.HypoxidaceaeSouth AfricaCorm70% Act—1560 (Cj)—[35]Aq—780 (Cj)—Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng.VerbenaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesMeOH—90 (Csp)—[33]LeavesAct—90 (Csp)—LeavesEssential oil—1500 (Csp)—Mimusops obovata Sond.SapotaceaeSouth AfricaBark70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Momordica balsamina L.CucurbitaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—350 (Csp)—[33]LeavesHex—3000 (Csp)—Mucuna coriacea BakerFabaceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—3000 (Csp)—[33]Peltophorum africanum Sond.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—1500 (Csp)—[33]Bark70% Act—780 (Cj)—[35]Aq—3125 (Cj)—Leaves70% Act—390 (Cj)—Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Pouzolzia mixta SolmsUrticaceaeSouth AfricaRootMeOH—750 (Csp)—[33]StemMeOH—750 (Csp)—LeavesMeOH—3000 (Csp)—RootAq—6000 (Csp)—Pterocarpus angolensis DC.FabaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—1500 (Csp)—[33]BarkAct—750 (Csp)—BarkDCM—750 (Csp)—BarkEA—90 (Csp)—BarkHex—1500 (Csp)—BarkCF—750 (Csp)—Pterocarpus santalinoides DC.FabaceaeNigeriaLeavesEA (friedelan-3-one)R (Cj)——[32]Quassia africana (Baill.) Baill.SimaroubaceaeDRCRoot barkEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—1000 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—Rhoicissus tridentata (L.f.) Wild and R.B. Drumm.VitaceaeSouth AfricaTuberAct—750 (Csp)—[33]FruitMeOH—350 (Csp)—FruitAct—180 (Csp)—Rourea obliquifoliolata GilgConnaraceaeDRCRootEt2O—500 (Cj), >1000 (Cc)—[29]MeOH—500 (Cj) 125 (Cc)—Aq—125 (Cj), 250 (Cc)—Searsia chirindensis (Baker f.) MoffettAnacardiaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesCrude (MeOH)—780 (Cj)—[34]DCM—6250 (Cj)—EA—780 (Cj)—BuOH—3125 (Cj)—EA (methyl gallate)—60 (Cj)—EA (myricetin-3-O-arabinopyranoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (kaempferol-3-O- rhamnoside)—130 (Cj)—EA (quercetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside)—250 (Cj)—Senna podocarpa (Guill. & Perr.) LockFabaceaeGuinea-BissauRootEtOH8 (Cj) 9 (Cc)——[27]LeavesEtOH10 (Cj) 14 (Cc)——[27]Sida spinosa L.MalvaceaeSouth AfricaLeavesAct—750 (Csp)—[33]Stephania abyssinica (Quart.-Dill. & A.Rich.) Walp.MenispermaceaeSouth AfricaRoot70% Act—6250 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Syzygium cordatum Hochst. ex KraussMyrtaceaeSouth AfricaBarkMeOH—350 (Csp)—[33]BarkAct—180 (Csp)—LeavesMeOH—3000 (Csp)—LeavesAct—750 (Csp)—Tapinanthus globiferus (A.Rich.) Tiegh.LoranthaceaeNigeriaStemHexR (Cj)——[25]EAR (Cj)——MeOHR (Cj)——Terminalia macroptera Guill. & Perr.CombretaceaeGuinea-BissauRootEtOH—25c, 50d(Csp)—[23]Watsonia densiflora BakerIridaceaeSouth AfricaBulb70% Act—12500 (Cj)—[35]Aq—>12500 (Cj)—Vitex doniana SweetLamiaceaeNigeriaBarkEtOH1a(Cj, Cc, Cl)NIE (Cj, Cc, Cl)—[24]Aq0a(Cj, Cc, Cl)NIE (Cj, Cc, Cl)—Vernonia amygdalina DelileAsteraceaeDRCLeavesEt2O—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—[29]MeOH—1000 (Cj, Cc)—Aq—>1000 (Cj, Cc)—Ximenia caffra Sond.OlacaceaeSouth AfricaBarkAct—350 (Csp)—[33]LeavesAct—750 (Csp)—Zornia milneana Mohlenbr.FabaceaeSouth AfricaWholeMeOH—180 (Csp)—[33]WholeAct—180 (Csp)—aZone of inhibition at 2 mg of the extract; bzone of inhibition at 12 mg of the extract; cMIC 50%; dMIC 90%; Csp: Campylobacter spp., Cc: C. coli, Cj: C. jejuni, Cj/c: C. jejuni/C. coli, Cl: C. lari, Cf: C. fetus, EtOH: ethanol; MeOH: methanol, Aq: aqueous, Et2O: diethyl ether, DCM: dichloromethane, EA: ethyl acetate, BuOH: butanol, Act: acetone, Hex: hexane, R: resistant, CF: chloroform, NIE: no inhibitory effect, NR: not reported.Most of the plants extracts were studied for activity againstC. jejuni (n = 27), followed by Campylobacter spp. (n = 20), C. coli (n = 11), C. lari (n = 2), and C. fetus (n = 1).The plants with the greatest antimicrobial activities wereCryptolepis sanguinolenta and Terminalia macroptera, in which both ethanolic extracts of the roots presented MIC = 25 μg/ml against C. jejuni and Campylobacter spp., respectively. The other plants with high antimicrobial activities were Combretum woodii (MIC = 40 for C. jejuni), Albertisia villosa (MIC = 62.5 for C. jejuni and C. coli), and Lippia javanica and Pterocarpus angolensis (both with a MIC = 90 for Campylobacter spp.).A total of seven pure compounds were isolated from 3 plants and tested againstCampylobacter spp. Cryptolepine, an alkaloid isolated from the ethanolic extract of C. sanguinolenta root, was the most effective compound with MIC ranging between 6.25 and 25 μg/ml for C. jejuni and C. coli [30]. Methyl gallate from the ethyl acetate extract of Searsia chirindensis leaf presented a MIC of 60 μg/ml against C. jejuni and was very effective as well [34]. Other four compounds were isolated from this plant extract, namely, myricetin-3-O-arabinopyranoside, myricetin-3-O-rhamnoside, kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside, and quercetin-3-O-arabinofuranoside with MICs ranging between 130 and 250 μg/ml [34]. However, friedelan-3-one, a terpenoid isolated from the ethyl acetate extract of Pterocarpus santalinoides leaf, was not effective against C. jejuni [32].Noin vivo studies of plants from the Sub-Saharan African region were found.


## 4. Discussion

This study had the aim of identifying thein vitro and in vivo activities of medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa against Campylobacter spp. We found out that several plants were analyzed for in vitro activity. These results show that attention has been paid to the search for new plant-based antibiotic alternatives in the region, although no in vivo studies were performed to date.A high number of plants (41/47) were tested by the MIC alone or in addition to the inhibition zone through the disk diffusion method. The disk diffusion method does not provide sufficient detail about the concentration of the extract that inhibits bacterial growth. Moreover, many factors can influence the results in such method, such as concentration of the compound in the test solution; volume of the test solution; density of the inoculum; duration and temperature of the diffusion phase before incubation; and thickness and composition of the medium, as well as incubation temperature [21]. Thus, we emphasize the importance of conducting research on the MIC values for the plant extracts and isolated compounds through broth microdilution.Acetone, water, and methanol were the most used solvents, probably because they allow the extraction of a wide range of active principles and are not toxic. It has also been found that, in addition to the plant type, the solvent used for extraction interferes with antibacterial activity [26], most likely because it influences the isolation of chemical compounds [37]. Thus, it is interesting to study various types of solvents in order to have more accurate results.Leaves, bark, and roots were the most studied plants parts, and this is certainly related to the ethnobotanical knowledge. In traditional African medicine, these plant parts are mostly used for the production of many remedies, including diarrhea remedies.Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Apocynaceae) was the plant with the highest antibiotic activity expressed in the lower MIC. The alkaloid cryptolepine was isolated from this plant. The root of the plant is used in traditional medicine in West Africa for the treatment of various infectious diseases including diarrhea, mostly through decoction [30, 38]. Additionally, the plant is traditionally used in the continent to treat fever, upper respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, septicemia, respiratory diseases, other enteric diseases, insomnia, amoebiasis, hypertension, inflammation, pyrexia, malaria, diabetes, stomach and intestinal disorders, tuberculosis, hepatitis, and wounds [38].In thein vitro study, cryptolepine activity was higher than that of prescribed antibiotics as co-trimoxazole and sulfamethoxazole. Moreover, Campylobacter spp. susceptibility to cryptolepine was equal to ampicillin [30]. This is an interesting and important finding that proves that this compound has greater activity and is similar to antibiotics used in clinical practice. Thus, it has great potential as a precursor to a new effective drug. Cryptolepine has also antibacterial activity against other bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, probably because it causes morphological changes, cellular breakdown, and DNA intercalating and inhibits topoisomerase II [38]. Probably this mechanism of action is similar to what happens in Campylobacter spp.Terminalia macroptera (Combretaceae), the second plant with the highest antibacterial activity (MIC = 25 μg/ml of ethanolic root extract), is also used in West Africa for treatment of infectious diseases such as hepatitis, cough, tuberculosis, diarrhea, dysentery, fever, and malaria [23, 39]. The most used parts are roots, stem bark, and leaves, although the fruits are also used. The most common preparation method to treat diarrhea is a root decoction [23, 39].The activity of the ethanolic extract ofT. macroptera root against Campylobacter spp. was similar to the antibiotic co-trimoxazole and higher than sulfamethoxazole, although smaller than other clinically used antibiotics [23]. These data are also very important and demonstrate the great antibiotic potential of this plant. The investigators have identified that a class of polyphenols called ellagitannins are the major compounds in the extract and active fractions [23]. Additionally, the plant was found to have flavonoids, triterpenoids, and other phenolic compounds [39]. Unlike C. sanguinolenta, the active compounds of this plant have not been analyzed for antimicrobial activity against Campylobacter spp. However, the available study validates its use in the treatment of diarrhea caused by Campylobacter spp.It is interesting that another plant of the Combretaceae family,Combretum woodii, was the third with greater antibacterial activity against Campylobacter spp. (MIC = 40 μg/ml of the acetone and ethanolic extract of leaves). Nevertheless, unlike other species from that family, traditional medicinal use of C. woodii has not been reported in the literature.At least twenty-fourCombretum species are used in African traditional medicine to treat ailments and diseases such as scorpion and snake bites, mental and heart problems, as well as fever and microbial infections, including diarrhea [40]. Combretum species are prepared as hot water decoctions or cold water extracts or mixed with food, such as maize porridge. Some decoctions have proved to be as effective as alcoholic and acetone extracts. Antimicrobially active compounds isolated from Combretum spp. are combretastatins, acidic tetracyclic and pentacyclic triterpenes/triterpenoids, ellagitannins, phenanthrenes, flavonoids, saponins, and cycloartane glycosides [26, 40].For the first time in 2005, the active compound present in the highest concentration in the leaves ofC. woodii was isolated, so called Combretastatin B5 (2′,3′,4-trihydroxy-3,5,4′-trimethoxybibenzyl). This compound was very effective against S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis (MIC of 16, 125, and 125 μg/ml, respectively), with the exception of Escherichia coli (>250 μg/ml). It is a stilbene, a bibenzylic compound with a potent antibacterial activity, which was greater or similar to that of ampicillin and chloramphenicol against the bacteria tested, except for E. coli [41]. For T. macroptera, the active compound of this plant has not been tested against Campylobacter spp. However, this compound is presumed to have even greater antimicrobial activity than the extract, and this may explain the traditional use of Combretum species in the treatment of diarrhea caused by Campylobacter spp.Another plant with a low MIC (62.5μg/ml) of the methanol and aqueous extracts was Albertisia villosa (Menispermaceae). This plant is native to DRC, where root decoction is ingested to treat diarrhea and dysentery. Therefore, the traditional use of the plant against C. jejuni and C. coli was validated. This plant is also promising in the discovery of new antibiotics [29]. A preliminary phytochemical testing detected alkaloids and saponins in the root of the plant [29]. Years later, bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids were isolated from the root bark, namely, cycleanine, cocsoline, and N-desmethylcycleanine. Cycleanine was the most abundant (85%) of all identified alkaloids. Through agar well diffusion, this compound was very effective against bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Streptococcus pyogenes and human pathogenic fungi such as Trichophyton longiformis, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus flavus [42].The ethanolic and acetone extracts of the leaves ofLippia javanica and the ethyl acetate extract of the bark of Pterocarpus angolensis both had MICs of 90 μg/ml for Campylobacter spp. These were described for the first time as effective against Campylobacter spp. in 2009 [33]. These plants are used in the Venda region of South Africa for treatment of several diseases. L. javanica leaves are used for treatment of asthma, malaria, and diarrhea. A decoction or infusion of root or leaves is taken orally to treat diarrhea [43]. Other traditional medicinal uses of the plant in Africa are to treat bronchitis, chest pains, wounds, fever/malaria, cough, and colds, as well as to repel mosquitoes [43].L. javanica naturally occurs in central, eastern, and southern Africa. Alkaloids, amino acids, flavonoids, iridoids, and triterpenes have been identified from the plant [43]. The antibacterial properties of L. javanica can be attributed to phenolic compounds such as apigenin 7, which was highly active against Vibrio cholera, E. faecalis, S. typhi, Proteus mirabilis, and P. aeruginosa [43]. Therefore, these results give credence to the use of the species’ infusions against bacterial infections including campylobacteriosis.P. angolensis bark is used for treatment of wounds, malaria, gonorrhea, headaches, stomach aches, diarrhea, mouth sores, and rashes in Venda, South Africa [33, 44]. Tannins and saponins were the identified classes of compounds in a preliminary phytochemical screening of stem bark [45]. The water and methanol extracts of the bark are very effective against S. aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Candida krusei, while the dichloromethane extract is effective against S. agalactiae and C. krusei. [45]. Four tannins were isolated from an ethanolic extract of the stem bark, namely, (-)-epicatechin, epicatechin-3-O-gallate, epicatechin (4b–8)-epicatechin (B2), and a hexamer of epicatechin. These compounds were effective against the following bacteria: S. aureus, S. typhi, Micrococcus kristinae, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus [44].Regardless of the positive results for antibacterial activity againstCampylobacter spp., the active principles of A. villosa, L. javanica, and P. angolensis were also not tested against the bacteria.Searsia chirindensis was one of the plants in which active principles were isolated and tested in South Africa. This plant is used in the South African traditional medicine to treat many diseases, one of which is diarrhea. From the five tested compounds isolated from the leaves of the plant, methyl gallate, a phenolic compound, presented the highest antimicrobial activity with a MIC of 60 μg/ml for C. jejuni [34]. Methyl gallate was the second compound in addition to cryptolepine, with greater antibacterial activity against Campylobacter spp. in Sub-Saharan Africa. The other four tested compounds were flavonol glycosides that also exhibited a good antimicrobial activity ranging between 130 and 250 μg/ml. This provides credence to the ethnomedicinal use of S. chirindensis to treat diarrhea, as well as describing chemical substances that may be precursors of new drugs.Although active principles of antidiarrheal medicinal plants from Sub-Saharan Africa had good results againstCampylobacter spp., other compounds such as friedelan-3-one, a terpene from the leaves of Pterocarpus santalinoides, had no activity against the bacteria. However, the compound had activity against other bacteria such as Helicobacter pylori that is in the same family as Campylobacter spp., as well as E. coli, an enteric bacterium [32].A study in South Africa reported that, among many bacteria tested on a total of 11 medicinal plants extracts,C. jejuni was the most resistant [35], probably due to its biochemical defense mechanisms. Some of the mechanisms are the efflux pumps that remove antibiotics from the cytosol of the bacteria [46]. Other biochemical defense mechanisms include decreasing outer membrane permeability and alterations in the membrane structure or in porin proteins [15]. This fact is important and emphasizes the truth that few plants with considerable antibacterial activity against Campylobacter spp. have been found. In this context, plants with low MIC values are promising in the development of new drugs or in the natural treatment of diarrhea caused by these bacteria.Other plants in which the extracts also had a high antibacterial activity (MIC below 200μg/ml) were Zornia milneana (whole plant), Syzygium cordatum (bark), Rourea obliquifoliolata (leaf), and Rhoicissus tridentata (fruit). All of these plants are used in the African traditional medicine to treat diarrhea, as well as other infectious diseases [29, 33]. However, none of them had their active compounds analyzed. These, as well as the most effective ones, can be considered as priorities for future studies aiming at isolation and analysis of their chemical compounds.Ethnobotanical information from Sub-Saharan Africa regarding the plants used for treatment of diarrhea should be compiled in order to develop morein vitro and in vivo studies on the effects of the most cited plants against Campylobacter spp. There is also a need to conduct research in other countries given that the flora in this region is rich in medicinal plants that have enormous therapeutic potential.This review has also found out that few active compounds have been isolated and analyzed for activity againstCampylobacter spp. This isolation and pharmacological analysis should be done for plants with low MIC levels in their extracts. In this work we identified such plants as Terminalia macroptera, Combretum woodii, Albertisia villosa, Lippia javanica, and Pterocarpus angolensis.Despite the isolation of pure chemical products or compounds from medicinal plants with high antibacterial activity, the other main challenge now is also to elucidate the biological mechanisms of the isolated compounds and to perform pharmacological studies. These studies would include the following:in vitro and in vivo efficacy, bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity, rate of resistance, bioavailability, in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, stability of the compounds in formulation, spectrum of antibacterial activity, treatment duration, and route of administration. In the absence of serious liabilities, the candidate drug might be declared for entry into a preclinical development program [47], and clinical trials could be further conducted according to the approved standards [18].


## 5. Conclusions

This review demonstrated that a total of 47 plants have been studied forin vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. in Sub-Saharan Africa. The number of tested plants is low when compared to the region's large flora. However, the region has promising plants with antibacterial activity against the bacteria.Some plants, such asCryptolepis sanguinolenta and Terminalia macroptera are the most effective with in vitro activity against Campylobacter spp. Besides these, Combretum woodii, Albertisia villosa, Lippia javanica, and Pterocarpus angolensis have also a strong activity against the bacteria. Of those plants with strong activity, only C. sanguinolenta had its active compounds isolated and tested against Campylobacter spp. These data demonstrate the need to isolate and test compounds from other plants as precursor steps in the discovery of novel candidate drugs.Isolated chemical compounds such as cryptolepine and methyl gallate fromC. sanguinolenta and Searsia chirindensis, respectively, have a strong antimicrobial activity. Given that Campylobacter spp. are rapidly gaining resistance to drugs currently in use, these compounds will need to be tested in further pharmacological studies in order to better understand the mechanisms of action and to test in vivo. This testing may lead to the development of new and more efficient antibiotics to treat campylobacteriosis. Nevertheless, search on medicinal plants should be thorough in Sub-Saharan African region.



---

*Source: 9485364-2020-05-15.xml*