# Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from Pus Samples in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Punjab, India

Authors: Rugira Trojan; Lovely Razdan; Nasib Singh
Journal: International Journal of Microbiology
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

We determined the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibilities patterns of bacterial isolates from pus samples collected from patients in a tertiary care hospital of Punjab, India.E. coli was the most prevalent pathogen (51.2%) followed byStaphylococcus aureus (21%),Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.6%),Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.8%),Citrobacter spp. (3.5%),Acinetobacter baumannii (2.3%),Proteus mirabilis (2.3%), andStreptococcus spp. (2.3%).E. coli,K. pneumoniae,A. baumannii, andCitrobacter isolates were resistant to multiple antibiotics including higher generation cephalosporins.S. aureus andStreptococcus isolates were sensitive to cloxacillin and vancomycin. However,P. aeruginosa,P. mirabilis, andStreptococcus isolates were found to be less resistant to the spectrum of antibiotics tested. Overall, our findings indicate the prevalence of resistance to different classes of antibiotics in bacterial isolates from pus infections and hence highlight the need for effective surveillance, regulator reporting, and antibiogram-guided antibiotic prescription.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

The human skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) caused by microbial pathogens during or after trauma, burn injuries, and surgical procedures result in the production of pus, a white to yellow fluid comprised of dead WBCs, cellular debris, and necrotic tissues [1–3]. Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria have been implicated in wound infections which commonly occur under hospital environment and result in significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and huge economic burden [4]. The emergence antibiotic resistance and its rapid spread of among pathogenic bacterial isolates are considered as grave threats to the public health worldwide. During the last few decades, multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial strains such asAcinetobacter baumannii,E. coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Gram-positive methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were increasingly associated with pus infections under hospital settings due to extensive misprescription and inadequate dose regimen of antibiotics [5–7]. Rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria poses a serious threat to public health globally due to the limited treatment options and lukewarm discovery of new classes of antibiotics [7, 8]. The objective of this study is to characterize the pyogenic bacteria from pus samples and to determine their antibiotic susceptibilities to various generations of antibiotics commonly used in chemotherapeutic interventions.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Sample Collection and Characterization

A total of 143 pus samples were collected by sterile syringe aspiration (n=41) and by sterile swabs (n=102) from inpatients and outpatients of different wards of Patel Hospital, Jalandhar, Punjab (India), over a period of 5 months from January 2014 to May 2014 in accordance with standard protocols and ethical guidelines. Pus samples were collected from skin (furuncles, pustules, and abrasions), nasal wounds, ears, legs, internal organs (lungs, kidney, and bladder), and catheters. Pus samples were kept in Cary-Blair transport medium until processed for Gram staining and culturing. The samples were aseptically inoculated on blood agar (with 5% sheep blood) and MacConkey agar plates, incubated aerobically at 35°C–37°C for 24–48 h. Identification and characterization of isolates were performed on the basis of Gram staining, microscopic characteristics, colony characteristic, and biochemical tests using standard microbiological methods.


### 2.2. Antimicrobial Agents

Antibiotics discs containing amikacin (30μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), azithromycin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (75/30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), cephalexin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (1 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), cloxacillin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gatifloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and vancomycin (30 μg) were obtained from Himedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India) and used as per manufacturer’s instructions.


### 2.3. Antibiotics Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial isolates were determined according to the method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [9]. Briefly, inocula were prepared for each bacterial isolate by adjusting the turbidity to 0.5 McFarland standard and spread on Muller-Hinton agar plates. Antibiotic discs (Himedia, Mumbai, India) were placed on the agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C for 24 h. The zones of inhibition were measured and the isolates were classified as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant according to CLSI tables and guidelines [9].


## 2.1. Sample Collection and Characterization

A total of 143 pus samples were collected by sterile syringe aspiration (n=41) and by sterile swabs (n=102) from inpatients and outpatients of different wards of Patel Hospital, Jalandhar, Punjab (India), over a period of 5 months from January 2014 to May 2014 in accordance with standard protocols and ethical guidelines. Pus samples were collected from skin (furuncles, pustules, and abrasions), nasal wounds, ears, legs, internal organs (lungs, kidney, and bladder), and catheters. Pus samples were kept in Cary-Blair transport medium until processed for Gram staining and culturing. The samples were aseptically inoculated on blood agar (with 5% sheep blood) and MacConkey agar plates, incubated aerobically at 35°C–37°C for 24–48 h. Identification and characterization of isolates were performed on the basis of Gram staining, microscopic characteristics, colony characteristic, and biochemical tests using standard microbiological methods.


## 2.2. Antimicrobial Agents

Antibiotics discs containing amikacin (30μg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), azithromycin (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), Cefoperazone/Sulbactam (75/30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), cephalexin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (1 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), cloxacillin (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gatifloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), netilmicin (30 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), and vancomycin (30 μg) were obtained from Himedia Laboratories (Mumbai, India) and used as per manufacturer’s instructions.


## 2.3. Antibiotics Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial isolates were determined according to the method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [9]. Briefly, inocula were prepared for each bacterial isolate by adjusting the turbidity to 0.5 McFarland standard and spread on Muller-Hinton agar plates. Antibiotic discs (Himedia, Mumbai, India) were placed on the agar plates and incubated overnight at 37°C for 24 h. The zones of inhibition were measured and the isolates were classified as sensitive, intermediate, and resistant according to CLSI tables and guidelines [9].


## 3. Results and Discussion

Of the 143 pus samples collected from different wards of the hospital, 86 samples (60.1%) showed bacterial growth after 24–48 h of incubation whereas 57 samples (39.9%) were negative for growth. Based on Gram staining, morphological features, culture characteristics, and biochemical characterization, the bacterial isolates were assigned to eight bacterial species.E. coli was the most frequent pathogen as revealed by 51.2% occurrence followed byS. aureus (21%),K. pneumoniae (11.6%),P. aeruginosa (5.8%), andCitrobacter spp. (3.5%) and approximately 2.3% each was represented byA. baumannii,P. mirabilis, andStreptococcus spp. (Figure 1). Gram-negative bacteria were the dominant isolates (77%) from pus samples compared to Gram-positive bacteria which are in agreement to several earlier studies. Our findings correlate with Zhang et al. [10] who reported predominance ofE. coli,S. aureus,K. pneumoniae, andP. aeruginosa in pus samples from patients with severe intra-abdominal infection. In another study,S. aureus was the dominant bacterial species from wounds followed byP. aeruginosa,P. mirabilis,E. coli, andCorynebacterium spp. [11]. According to Dryden [12],S. aureus and MRSA are major cause of soft tissue infections in hospitalized patients. Several other reports have also implicatedPseudomonas,Staphylococcus,Streptococcus,Klebsiella, andE. coli in wound infections [6, 13]. Antibiogram results from the present study show thatE. coli was more resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cephalosporins, while being least resistant to amikacin, imipenem, gentamicin, and meropenem (Table 1). On the other hand,A. baumannii showed extensive multidrug resistance pattern as it was resistant to all the antibiotics.P. aeruginosa was more susceptible to tested antibiotics compared toK. pneumoniae. Both species showed resistance to cephalosporins. Previous studies from Canada, Croatia, and Latin America foundP. aeruginosa isolates resistant to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and ciprofloxacin but not to piperacillin [14, 15].Citrobacter isolates showed resistance to eight antibiotics whereas they were moderately susceptible to other antibiotics.S. aureus was highly susceptible to vancomycin (100%), linezolid (100%), imipenem (89%), and meropenem (84%) while it showed resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, and azithromycin. Unlike some reports in which MRSA was associated with wound infections [16, 17], our findings revealed susceptibility inS. aureus isolates towards cloxacillin and cephalosporins.P. mirabilis andStreptococcus isolates, however, exhibited minimal resistance and were susceptible to most of the antibiotics (Table 1). Both Gram-positive isolates were fully susceptible to vancomycin and linezolid.Table 1
Antibiotic susceptibilities of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria isolated from pus samples at a tertiary care hospital in Punjab, India.
Antibiotics Antibiotic sensitivity (%) of bacterial isolates E. coli (n=44) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=5) Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=10) Proteus mirabilis (n=2) Citrobacterspp.(n=3) Acinetobacter baumannii (n=2) Staphylococcus aureus (n=18) Streptococcusspp.(n=2) Amikacin 75 80 50 100 0 0 nt nt Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 5 0 0 50 0 0 11 50 Aztreonam 19 40 10 50 0 0 nt nt Ampicillin nt nt nt nt nt nt 11 50 Azithromycin nt nt nt nt nt nt 23 100 Cefepime 16 20 10 50 33 0 34 50 Cefoperazone/Sulbactam 34 20 10 100 33 0 nt nt Ceftriaxone 30 20 10 50 33 0 67 100 Cefotaxime 21 0 20 50 0 0 45 100 Cefuroxime 5 0 10 0 0 0 78 100 Cephalexin nt nt nt nt nt nt 67 100 Ciprofloxacin 21 60 40 100 67 0 11 100 Clindamycin nt nt nt nt nt nt 73 100 Cloxacillin nt nt nt nt nt nt 100 100 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 32 20 20 50 0 0 34 50 Ertapenem 27 nt 30 50 33 0 nt nt Erythromycin nt nt nt nt nt nt 28 100 Gatifloxacin 21 40 40 50 66 0 nt nt Gentamicin 46 60 40 50 0 0 nt nt Imipenem 75 80 50 50 67 0 89 100 Levofloxacin 25 60 30 50 67 0 28 100 Linezolid nt nt nt nt nt nt 100 100 Meropenem 68 80 40 50 67 0 84 100 Netilmicin 57 80 30 50 33 0 nt nt Norfloxacin 14 20 20 50 67 0 nt nt Ofloxacin 16 40 30 100 67 0 nt nt Piperacillin-tazobactam 36 80 40 100 33 0 28 100 Teicoplanin nt nt nt nt nt nt 78 100 Tetracycline nt nt nt nt nt nt 50 50 Vancomycin nt nt nt nt nt nt 100 100 nt: not tested.Figure 1
Distribution of bacterial pathogens (%) isolated from pus samples at a tertiary care hospital in Punjab, India.This study provides the evidence of high prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria in pus samples of patients collected from a tertiary care hospital environment. Our findings indicate the predominance ofE. coli among the bacterial isolates of pus. The prevalence and antibiotics resistance patterns of pyogenic bacterial isolates usually exhibit variability according to geographic areas and climate conditions. Existence of high drug resistance to multiple antibiotics inE. coli,S. aureus,K. pneumoniae, andP. aeruginosa isolates from pus samples in this study and several other related reports points towards negligence on patients part, incomplete treatment schedules, antibiotics misuse, self-prescription, misprescription, lack of regional antibiogram data, and limited knowledge about multidrug-resistant isolates and antimicrobial resistance among clinicians. Updated knowledge of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinical isolates will not only assist in designing the most appropriate dose-regimen and treatment schedule against wound infections but also help in curbing the alarmingly expanding menace of drug resistance.


## 4. Conclusion

In conclusion, pyogenic wound infections were found prevalent in the tertiary care hospital andE. coli isolates showed highest incidence followed byS. aureus,P. aeruginosa,K. pneumoniae,A. baumannii,Citrobacter,P. mirabilis, andStreptococcus spp. Bacterial isolates exhibited high to moderate levels of resistance against different classes of antibiotics. The susceptibility data from this report may be worth consideration while implementing empiric treatment strategies for pyogenic infections. At the same time, strict health policies should also be implemented to regulate the purchase and prescription and restrict the unsupervised antibiotic use as well as continuous monitoring and reporting antibiotic resistance.



---

*Source: 9302692-2016-10-30.xml*