# Development of Miniature Stewart Platform Using TiNiCu Shape-Memory-Alloy Actuators

Authors: Alaa AbuZaiter; Ee Leen Ng; Suhail Kazi; Mohamed Sultan Mohamed Ali
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

A Stewart platform is a parallel manipulator robot that is able to perform three linear movements, lateral, longitudinal, and vertical, and three rotations, pitch, yaw, and roll. This paper reports a 30 mm × 30 mm × 34 mm miniscale Stewart platform using TiNiCu shape-memory-alloy (SMA) actuators. The proposed Stewart platform possesses various advantages, such as large actuation force and high robustness with a simple mechanical structure. This Stewart platform uses four SMA actuators and four bias springs and performs a linearz-axis movement and tilting motions. The SMA actuators are activated by passing a current through the SMA wires using a heating circuit that generates a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal. This signal is varied to control the level of the displacement and tilting angle of the platform. The tilting direction depends on the SMA actuator that is activated, while all four SMA actuators are activated to achieve the linear z-axis movement. Each SMA actuator exerts a maximum force of 0.6 N at PWM duty cycle of 100%. The fabricated miniature Stewart platform yields a full actuation of 12 mm in the z-axis at 55°C, with a maximum tilting angle of 30° in 4 s.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Stewart platform is a parallel manipulator robot utilized to control the position of an object. The typical Stewart platform has a platform, a base platform, and six limbs which could provide six degrees of freedom (DOF) illustrated, three linear movements, lateral, longitudinal, and vertical (x,y,z), and three rotations, pitch, yaw, and roll. During the past decades, Stewart platform had attracted attention of many researchers especially those in robotics field [1]. This type of parallel manipulator possesses high load capacity, precise positioning, high rigidity, and reduced sensitivity to certain errors [2, 3]. One of the promising areas of Stewart platform is in flight simulator [4]. Other potential applications of Stewart platform are biomedical applications including microsurgical tools, for example, ophthalmic microsurgery, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and brain surgery [5], as well as the application in Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) machine tool structures, for example, electrodischarge machining [6] and radio telescope positioning system [7].Actuators are mounted end to end on the top and the base platform, respectively. An actuator converts a type of energy to motion for moving or controlling a mechanism. There are many types of actuators implemented in Stewart platform. The current Stewart platform uses conventional actuators, for instance, the hydraulic actuator [4], pneumatic actuator [8], and servo motor [9]. Hydraulic actuator has high power to weight ratio, has a rapid response [10], and can exert a large force. However, this actuator is large in size, fluid leakage may occur, and maintenance cost is expensive. On the other hand, pneumatic actuator provides fast response and clean operation without the need for oil or fluid for actuation. The disadvantages of pneumatic actuator are mostly caused by nonlinear behavior of the system itself. It is not able to give constant speed to control movement of bodies, has low accuracy, and has difficulty in performing at slow speed. Servo motor provides a great variety of advantages over other actuation methods. Most robotic manipulator-like miniature Stewart platform uses servo motor as the actuator. The advantages of such actuator are that it is light in weight and yet it can yield a relatively large torque at low voltage and only require small workspace and it provides quiet operation compared to other types of actuators. In fact, they could provide a better accuracy and repeatability work result. However, the cost of this kind of actuator is high. These conventional actuators had made the model become large [11], bulky, and expensive in cost and possess noisy operation. Shape-memory alloy (SMA) that possesses various advantages could potentially solve the issues associated with the conventional actuators especially in the case of Stewart platform.SMA has been extensively studied in the past few decades due to its uniqueness of “smart” properties. SMA is an alloy, which could remember and return to its original or “remembered” shape when heated [12]. SMA can exist in two different temperature dependent crystal structures (phases) which are low temperature phase called the martensite phase and high temperature phase called the austenite phase [13]. Figure 1 shows the crystal structure in SMA during its phase transformation cycle. At martensite phase, the crystal structure can be easily deformed to a desired shape due to the fact that SMA at this phase has a low yield strength. When SMA is heated above its phase transition temperature indicating it had reached its austenite phase, it will return to its predetermined shape. During this phase, the crystal structure changes to a highly ordered structure and the atomic particles arrange symmetrically. This kind of arrangement possesses high yield strength [14]. The unique behavior of SMA has shown an increased trend in its demands on engineering application in numerous commercial fields such as automotive, biomedical, and robotic field especially as microactuators or artificial muscle [15, 16].Figure 1
SMA phases and crystal structure.Development of Stewart platform using SMA as the actuators has been extensively reported due to the tremendous characteristics of SMA [17–20]. However, they are large in size, involve complicated design, and provide very limited displacement. These factors limit the application range of miniature Stewart platform. In fact, there is also a lack of characterization on the performance of the miniature Stewart platform. For example, the force exerted by the SMA wire, velocity, and dynamic of the moving platform and tilting angles according to the number of Stewart platform’s limbs actuated are not well characterized.This paper reports a miniscale Stewart platform with four DOF. The miniature Stewart platform utilizes SMA microactuators to ensure the device has a high robustness with simple mechanical structure. The device is able to perform linearz-axis movement and also tilting motions. Performance characterization of the device is conducted to show the reliability of SMA in the miniature Stewart platform.


## 2. Design and Principle Work

The size of miniature Stewart platform developed in this effort is 30 mm × 30 mm × 34 mm in dimension with three DOF, two of which enable the Stewart platform to rotate inx- and y-axis while the third DOF is responsible of moving the platform in z-axis as shown in Figure 2. The construction of this device involves a platform, a base platform, and four limbs with identical dimensions. Each limb consists of a bias spring and an SMA actuator (Figure 2).Figure 2
Stewart platform design.Figure3 shows the working principle of miniature Stewart platform. The actuation will be controlled using a user interface from a computer. The computer then connects to a microcontroller. For actuations to take place, the microcontroller will generate a PWM signal to be transmitted into a heating circuit with voltage and current source of 5 V and 2 A, respectively. This is to ensure a sufficient heat generated on SMA actuator and exceeds the transition temperature of 70°C (austenitic phase temperature) for its actuation. The duty cycle of the PWM signal is varied to control the level of actuation in terms of Stewart platform’s height displacement and tilting angle. A bias spring stretches the SMA when it is at martensite phase, whereas at austenite phase, SMA actuator will exert a force which then pulls the platform and compresses the spring. Figure 4 depicts the movement in three DOF of developed design. By actuating one limb or two adjacent limbs simultaneously, two or one rotational DOF around x- and y-axis can be achieved, respectively. The tilting direction and its angle depend on which limbs are activated and on the duty cycle of PWM signal (Figure 4(a)) such that the higher the duty cycle, the more the yielded tilt. Furthermore, activating the four limbs leads to the third DOF in the z-axis. Similarly, the displacement in the z-axis direction is also determined by the duty cycle of PWM signal (Figure 4(b)).Figure 3
Working principle of the Stewart platform.Figure 4
The mobility of developing Stewart platform; (a) tilting effect of Stewart platform; (b) linearz-axis movement.
(a)
(b)


## 3. Fabrication

A TiNiCu type SMA wire (M-type, Memry Corp., Germany) with thickness of 170µm was used as actuator in Stewart platform. The SMA wires were trained to memorize a spring-like shape (Figure 5(a)) by annealing at 400°C with predefined shape for one hour and then crunching in cold water. Bias springs with an outer diameter of 9.2 mm with a wire thickness of 0.2 mm and height of 25 mm were fabricated (Figure 5(b)). The top and base platforms were designed using CAD software and fabricated using rapid prototyping process. Then, four limbs each of them consisting of an SMA actuator and a bias spring were attached to the base of the Stewart platform (Figure 6(a)). Both ends of each SMA actuator were connected to the heating circuit using conductive paste. The limbs were then connected to the top platform to form a complete prototype (Figure 6(b)). Screws were used to ensure a firm attachment and connectivity between the SMA wire and wire that connects to the heating circuit. A PWM signal that is generated from a heating circuit is used to control the current flowing in the four SMA microactuators. The microcontroller is connected to the heating circuit to control the PWM signal which consequently controls the actuation of the SMA microactuators.Figure 5
(a) Dimension of SMA spring; (b) bias spring design.
(a)
(b)Figure 6
Fabrication results: (a) limbs attached to base platform; (b) complete prototype.
(a)
(b)


## 4. Experimental Results and Discussions

Experimental characterizations for the developed device were performed using setup illustrated in Figure7. Laser displacement sensor (LK-G32, Keyence, IL, USA) and IR thermal camera (D-07739, Jenoptic, Jena, Germany) were used to measure the displacement range of the Stewart platform and the temperature of SMA actuators, respectively. Force gauge (IPM650, Futek, CA, USA) was used to measure the force exerted by the SMA actuator when it is activated (force gauge not shown in Figure 7).Figure 7
Experimental setup for miniature Stewart platform performance characterization.


### 4.1. Variation of Displacement with Different Values of Duty Cycle

The aim of this experiment is to evaluate the temporal response of SMA actuator with respect to different duty cycle of PWM signals generated from the microcontroller. The measurement process of temporal response for the prototype is being illustrated in Figure8. Only one limb’s SMA is actuated for this purpose. The SMA will be on (actuated) for 15 s and off (not actuated) for another 15 s to ensure a consistency throughout the experiment. The change in displacement was recorded every 200 ms. The experiments are carried out using different values of PWM which consists of duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%. A temporal response graph is plotted as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
Measurement process of temporal response for miniature Stewart platform prototype at PWM duty cycle of 75%.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Temporal response of SMA actuator with different PWM duty cycles.From the graph, it is observed that the time response of SMA actuator to reach its full actuations is 8 s, 4 s, and 2.6 s for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. Meanwhile, the temporal response of SMA actuator is 2.519 mm/s, 4.71 mm/s, and 6.05 mm/s for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. The difference in the duty cycle values has an important factor in controlling the actuation speed. As the given duty cycle is higher, the actuation time to reach to the full actuation will become lesser. Maximum displacement of each duty cycle shown in the graph is different due to the fact that the initial values are set differently. From the calculation of initial value added to the displacement value obtained from sensor, the prototype could move to a maximum displacement of 12 mm. It is observed that the miniature Stewart platform prototype is able to tilt up to an angle of ~30°. The results are shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Prototype results: (a) initial state; (b) maximum displacement; (c) tilting angle.
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 4.2. Variation of Temperature with Different Values of Duty Cycle

The aim of this experiment is to determine the actuation temperature (thermal response) of SMA actuator with respect to different duty cycle of a PWM signal. The measurement process of thermal response of SMA actuator is shown in Figure11. For this experiment, only one SMA actuator is actuated and the change of temperature was recorded every second. As shown in Figure 11, the temperature was increased to 82°C in 7 s and could be varied by tuning the PWM signal. To ensure consistency, the actuation time of SMA is the same as the measurement of temporal response where the actuator was in ON state for 15 s and turned off for 15 s. The experiment was carried out using different PWM signal that consists of duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%. Experimental results were recorded and graph of the thermal response of SMA actuator is plotted as shown in Figure 12.Figure 11
IR image showing transformation of SMA from martensite to austenite phase.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 12
Thermal response of SMA actuator with different PWM duty cycles.The thermal response graph illustrates that the time for SMA actuator to reach its austenite phase with respect to the duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100% is 9 s, 6 s, and 5 s, respectively. The maximum temperatures at the end of the actuation are 104°C, 142.3°C, and 162°C for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. The difference in maximum temperature is due to the average voltage supplied across the SMA as a result of applying different values of duty cycle. On the other hand, the higher the temperature is, the faster the response of SMA to transform from martensite to austenite phase is. As for the cooling process, where austenite changes to martensite phase, at the duty cycle of 50%, the SMA actuator took 30 s, whereas at a duty cycle of 75% and 100%, the SMA actuator took more than 30 s to reach room temperature. When the SMA actuator reaches martensite phase, it is readily deformed by any external force, which in this case is pulling force exerted by the spring.


### 4.3. Combination of Temporal Response and Thermal Response of Miniature Stewart Platform

This section discusses the temporal response together with thermal response of the miniature Stewart platform prototype at PWM duty cycle of 75%. The graphs of temporal response and thermal response at duty cycle of 75% are combined. The fabricated miniature Stewart platform yields a full actuation at 55°C and is able to tilt a maximum angle of 30° in 4 s with the temporal response of 4.71 mm/s when PWM duty cycle is set at 75% (Figure13).Figure 13
Temporal and thermal response of SMA actuator at PWM duty cycle of 75%.The developed miniature Stewart platform prototype could perform several motions. When one SMA in the prototype’s limbs is actuated, it will exert a force larger than the force in the springs and eventually pulls the platform down to the side where SMA is actuated. This will produce a tilting effect of the prototype as shown in Figure14. When the four SMAs of all the limbs are actuated simultaneously, the platform will be pulled by the four SMA actuators and it will produce a linear z-axis motion as shown in Figure 15.Figure 14
Tilting effect of miniature Stewart platform prototype; (a) initial state; (b) one-limb actuation; (c) two-limb actuation.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 15
Linearz-axis motion height control of miniature Stewart platform prototype; (a) initial state; (b) four-limb actuation (t=2 s); (c) four-limb actuation (t=4 s).
(a)
(b)
(c)


### 4.4. Discussions

The results demonstrated above show the feasibility to develope a Stewart platform, by relatively simple fabrication steps, that has low cost and an easy control method (compared to [21]). Furthermore, the use of SMA actuator, as explained in the introduction, has added up several advantages; it has provided high working density which allowed generating high force compared to other similar platforms such as the platform reported by Estevez et al. [22]. Also, the shape-memorizing ability provided both the required force and the direction to actuate the limbs. Another advantage of developing this design is to achieve three-DOF motion, which is higher than other previous works that utilized SMA in Stewart platform such as the one reported by Hadi et al. [23] which only had two DOF. Besides, the size of this platform was miniaturized while maintaining higher displacement compared to other bigger size SMA-based Stewart platforms [19, 24].The small size feature promotes several possible applications for this platform such as milling machine technology, in biomedical application as microsurgery tools and in robotic systems as end of robotic arm. Moreover, series of this platform can be attached to form flexible robot arm. Last but not least, this design can be used as miniature light or laser beam reflector by attaching mirror to the top platform surface.


## 4.1. Variation of Displacement with Different Values of Duty Cycle

The aim of this experiment is to evaluate the temporal response of SMA actuator with respect to different duty cycle of PWM signals generated from the microcontroller. The measurement process of temporal response for the prototype is being illustrated in Figure8. Only one limb’s SMA is actuated for this purpose. The SMA will be on (actuated) for 15 s and off (not actuated) for another 15 s to ensure a consistency throughout the experiment. The change in displacement was recorded every 200 ms. The experiments are carried out using different values of PWM which consists of duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%. A temporal response graph is plotted as shown in Figure 9.Figure 8
Measurement process of temporal response for miniature Stewart platform prototype at PWM duty cycle of 75%.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 9
Temporal response of SMA actuator with different PWM duty cycles.From the graph, it is observed that the time response of SMA actuator to reach its full actuations is 8 s, 4 s, and 2.6 s for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. Meanwhile, the temporal response of SMA actuator is 2.519 mm/s, 4.71 mm/s, and 6.05 mm/s for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. The difference in the duty cycle values has an important factor in controlling the actuation speed. As the given duty cycle is higher, the actuation time to reach to the full actuation will become lesser. Maximum displacement of each duty cycle shown in the graph is different due to the fact that the initial values are set differently. From the calculation of initial value added to the displacement value obtained from sensor, the prototype could move to a maximum displacement of 12 mm. It is observed that the miniature Stewart platform prototype is able to tilt up to an angle of ~30°. The results are shown in Figure10.Figure 10
Prototype results: (a) initial state; (b) maximum displacement; (c) tilting angle.
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4.2. Variation of Temperature with Different Values of Duty Cycle

The aim of this experiment is to determine the actuation temperature (thermal response) of SMA actuator with respect to different duty cycle of a PWM signal. The measurement process of thermal response of SMA actuator is shown in Figure11. For this experiment, only one SMA actuator is actuated and the change of temperature was recorded every second. As shown in Figure 11, the temperature was increased to 82°C in 7 s and could be varied by tuning the PWM signal. To ensure consistency, the actuation time of SMA is the same as the measurement of temporal response where the actuator was in ON state for 15 s and turned off for 15 s. The experiment was carried out using different PWM signal that consists of duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%. Experimental results were recorded and graph of the thermal response of SMA actuator is plotted as shown in Figure 12.Figure 11
IR image showing transformation of SMA from martensite to austenite phase.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Figure 12
Thermal response of SMA actuator with different PWM duty cycles.The thermal response graph illustrates that the time for SMA actuator to reach its austenite phase with respect to the duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100% is 9 s, 6 s, and 5 s, respectively. The maximum temperatures at the end of the actuation are 104°C, 142.3°C, and 162°C for duty cycle of 50%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. The difference in maximum temperature is due to the average voltage supplied across the SMA as a result of applying different values of duty cycle. On the other hand, the higher the temperature is, the faster the response of SMA to transform from martensite to austenite phase is. As for the cooling process, where austenite changes to martensite phase, at the duty cycle of 50%, the SMA actuator took 30 s, whereas at a duty cycle of 75% and 100%, the SMA actuator took more than 30 s to reach room temperature. When the SMA actuator reaches martensite phase, it is readily deformed by any external force, which in this case is pulling force exerted by the spring.


## 4.3. Combination of Temporal Response and Thermal Response of Miniature Stewart Platform

This section discusses the temporal response together with thermal response of the miniature Stewart platform prototype at PWM duty cycle of 75%. The graphs of temporal response and thermal response at duty cycle of 75% are combined. The fabricated miniature Stewart platform yields a full actuation at 55°C and is able to tilt a maximum angle of 30° in 4 s with the temporal response of 4.71 mm/s when PWM duty cycle is set at 75% (Figure13).Figure 13
Temporal and thermal response of SMA actuator at PWM duty cycle of 75%.The developed miniature Stewart platform prototype could perform several motions. When one SMA in the prototype’s limbs is actuated, it will exert a force larger than the force in the springs and eventually pulls the platform down to the side where SMA is actuated. This will produce a tilting effect of the prototype as shown in Figure14. When the four SMAs of all the limbs are actuated simultaneously, the platform will be pulled by the four SMA actuators and it will produce a linear z-axis motion as shown in Figure 15.Figure 14
Tilting effect of miniature Stewart platform prototype; (a) initial state; (b) one-limb actuation; (c) two-limb actuation.
(a)
(b)
(c)Figure 15
Linearz-axis motion height control of miniature Stewart platform prototype; (a) initial state; (b) four-limb actuation (t=2 s); (c) four-limb actuation (t=4 s).
(a)
(b)
(c)


## 4.4. Discussions

The results demonstrated above show the feasibility to develope a Stewart platform, by relatively simple fabrication steps, that has low cost and an easy control method (compared to [21]). Furthermore, the use of SMA actuator, as explained in the introduction, has added up several advantages; it has provided high working density which allowed generating high force compared to other similar platforms such as the platform reported by Estevez et al. [22]. Also, the shape-memorizing ability provided both the required force and the direction to actuate the limbs. Another advantage of developing this design is to achieve three-DOF motion, which is higher than other previous works that utilized SMA in Stewart platform such as the one reported by Hadi et al. [23] which only had two DOF. Besides, the size of this platform was miniaturized while maintaining higher displacement compared to other bigger size SMA-based Stewart platforms [19, 24].The small size feature promotes several possible applications for this platform such as milling machine technology, in biomedical application as microsurgery tools and in robotic systems as end of robotic arm. Moreover, series of this platform can be attached to form flexible robot arm. Last but not least, this design can be used as miniature light or laser beam reflector by attaching mirror to the top platform surface.


## 5. Conclusion

A miniscale Stewart platform that uses four SMA actuators and four bias springs to perform a linearz-axis movement and tilting motions was successfully developed and characterized. Each actuator was driven by heating circuit operating via PWM signal for its actuation, with a voltage and current source of 5 V and 2 A, respectively. The use of PWM signal as a driving signal enables the displacement control without the need for physical modification in the heating circuit. PWM signal was varied to control the level of actuation in terms of the z-axis displacement and tilting. Each SMA actuator exerted a maximum force of 0.6 N at PWM duty cycle of 100%. The fabricated miniature Stewart platform produced a full actuation at 55°C and a maximum tilting angle of 30° with a temporal response of 4.71 mm/s, when the PWM duty cycle is set to 75%. The displacement in the z-axis has a range of 12 mm. Several future works are expected to be done to improve the performance of the currently developed miniature Stewart platform. This includes improvements of the hardware, such as adding more limbs to achieve more actuation directions and higher DOF. Another critical enhancement is optimizing the response time of the actuator which can be achieved by employing SMA with lower austenitic phase temperature [25, 26]. Additionally, forward and inverse kinematics are also important elements to be explored.



---

*Source: 928139-2015-07-07.xml*