# Analysis of the Long-Term Corrosion Behavior of X80 Pipeline Steel in Acidic Red Soil Using Electrical Resistance Test Technique

Authors: Shuaixing Wang; Daoxin Liu; Nan Du; Qing Zhao; Jinhua Xiao
Journal: Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
 (2015)

---

## Abstract

The long-term corrosion rate of X80 steel in an acidic red soil was monitored in situ by using a precise electrical resistance (ER) test system. The corrosion characteristics of X80 steel were examined via SEM, EDS, and XRD. The results indicated that the corrosion rate determined from ER test was very similar to that obtained from the mass loss test. The ER test technique made it possible to predict the long-term corrosion rate of steel in soil in situ. The corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil was about 0.0902 mm/a at 38 weeks, but the corrosion rate was dropped to 0.0226 mm/a after 5 years. The final corrosion product layer was composed mainly of FeOOH,γ-Fe2O3, and FeCO3.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Pipelines are the preferred method for transporting large volumes of crude oil and natural gas over long distances. However, the susceptibility of pipeline steel to corrosion has a negative impact on the operation of the pipelines. In fact, the pipeline steel undergoes stress corrosion cracking (SCC) [1–4], pitting [5], or crevice corrosion [6] in various soils. Red clay soil constitutes one of the major soil types in Eastern and Southeastern China. This soil is acidic, in general, owing to the natural acidification including intensive weathering and leaching process under humid climate conditions [7]. It has been found that acidic red soils are extremely aggressive towards carbon steel [8], and the corrosion of pipeline steel in this kind of soil is more severe than that in neutral/alkaline soils [3, 9–11]. Therefore, monitoring the corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil environments is crucial to addressing both cost and safety concerns.In general, metal corrosion in soil can be measured simply and efficiently through long-term exposure in a soil test station; however, this method requires a long experiment period and the data is only obtained at the end of the corrosion process [12]. Recently, with the development of electrochemical measurement techniques, linear polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy [3, 6, 10], and electrochemical noise [13] and scanning Kelvin probe [14] measurements have become conventional methods for studying the soil corrosion. These methods provide relative information about metal corrosion in the soil. However, they are inadequate for describing the actual corrosion that occurs based on the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil. Therefore, it is essential to develop various real-time and in situ corrosion monitoring techniques for studying metal corrosion in soil. In recent, some methods or models for in situ monitoring soil corrosion have been proposed [15, 16].The electrical resistance of a metal depends mainly on its geometry and intrinsic resistivity. Therefore, the corrosion-induced change in geometry of a metal can be used to determine the metal loss and corrosion rate. The electric resistance (ER) sensor has been widely used in many industries to determine the corrosion rate owing to the ease of measurement and interpretation [17–19]. However, the low sensitivity of these sensors has stymied their use for underground steel structures. Recently, some precision ER sensors have been invented and used to measure the corrosion kinetics of steel in the soil. For example, the ER sensor invented by Li [20, 21] can detect changes of 0.01 mm/y or less in the corrosion rate. However, the sensitivities of most ER sensors are determined by measuring the short-term corrosion data. The use of the precision ER measurement technique for monitoring the long-term corrosion rate of pipeline steel in acidic soil environments remains unexplored.As such, in this work, a precise ER test system was developed, and the relationship between the resistance variation and the corrosion rate of X80 steel was determined. The system was also used to monitor the corrosion rate of X80 steel during 5 y of burial in acidic red soil. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the morphology, while energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to determine the composition of the corroded steel.


## 2. Experimental

### 2.1. Material and Test Site

API-X80 pipeline steel was used for all the tests in this work. This steel had a chemical composition (wt%) of C 0.055, Si 0.220, Mn 1.620, S 0.002, P 0.013, V 0.030, Ti 0.009, Nb 0.070, and Fe balance. Specimens with dimensions of 100 ×φ 10 mm were tested. Prior to the tests, the specimens were ground with 240 and 800 grit emery papers, cleaned with deionized water and acetone, and dried in a stream of cool air. The ends of each specimen were machined screw threads of 8–10 mm.Nanchang (28°41′N, 115°53′E) was the represented area of acidic red clay soil in Southeast China, according to the USDA soil taxonomy. This region had a typical subtropical monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature, annual precipitation, and pH value of 17.7°C, 1600–1700 mm, and 3.90–4.35, respectively. The specimens were buried at a depth of 1 m in the region. In addition, analysis results revealed that the soil in the region where the specimens were buried had a chemical composition (wt%) of Cl− 0.0066, S
O
4
2
- 0.0058, and H
C
O
3
- 0.0010, a pH value of ~4.7, and a water content of 26% ± 2%. Specimens were buried for a total of 5 y (from June 2009 to May 2014).


### 2.2. Test Principle

Resistance is the basic attribute of metal material. The resistance of metal is calculated from (1), where R, ρ, l, and S are the resistance, resistivity, length, and sectional area of the specimen, respectively. Generally, the resistivity of a given metal is a constant, and therefore the resistance varies only with the geometry of the specimen. Furthermore, corrosion results in changes in the size of the specimen, and hence the ER changes. So, the corrosion depth can be calculated from the variation of ER.Figure1 shows the schematic of the dimensional variation of the clubbed X80 steel. If ρ and l are constant, then the resistance of the steel before (R
0) and after (R
1) corrosion is related through (2). Thus, the corrosion depth and corrosion rate can be calculated from (3) and (4). Here, h is corrosion depth (μm), r
0 and R
0 are the initial radius (mm) and resistance (μΩ) of the specimen, R
1 is resistance (μΩ) of the corroded specimen, and v and t are corrosion rate (mm/a) and time (y), respectively:(1)
R
=
ρ
l
S
,
(2)
R
0
R
1
=
r
1
r
0
2
=
1
-
h
r
0
2
,
(3)
h
=
r
0
1
-
R
0
R
1
,
(4)
v
=
h
t
.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the dimension variation for clubbed X80 steel.Besides, the mass loss test was used in this work to evaluate the accuracy of the ER test. In the mass loss test, the corrosion rate was calculated from (5) [22], where v, Δ
W, S, ρ, and t are the corrosion rate (mm/a), weight loss (g), surface area (cm2) of the specimen, density of the steel (g/cm3), and time (h), respectively: (5)
v
=
8.46
×
10
4
Δ
W
S
t
ρ
.


### 2.3. Test Setup

In this work, the electrical resistance of the specimens was measured by a precision resistance test system developed in our laboratory. Figure2 shows the schematic of the electrical resistance test system and a photo of the fixture. As shown in Figure 2(b), the clubbed specimen was conducted with the wires through the fixture. The fixture consisted of copper nuts, brass bolts, and brass gaskets. Moreover, the fixtures were wrapped with PTFE film and epoxy resin in order to avoid the interference of soil on the conduction. This system allowed continuous in situ monitoring of the resistance of the steel specimen, with a precision of 0.1 μΩ. Besides, the system could monitor the variation of temperature and humidity and had the functions of data storage, data transmission, and temperature correction. The resistance displayed on the setup was the resistance corrected to 25°C.Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the electrical resistance test setup (a) and the photo of fixture (b) for clubbed X80 steel specimen in soil.
(a)
(b)


### 2.4. Surface Characterization

SEM (Quanta-200, FEI), EDS (INCA, Oxford), and XRD (D8-Advance, Bruker) were used to examine the morphology and determine the composition and phase structure of the corroded specimens, respectively.


## 2.1. Material and Test Site

API-X80 pipeline steel was used for all the tests in this work. This steel had a chemical composition (wt%) of C 0.055, Si 0.220, Mn 1.620, S 0.002, P 0.013, V 0.030, Ti 0.009, Nb 0.070, and Fe balance. Specimens with dimensions of 100 ×φ 10 mm were tested. Prior to the tests, the specimens were ground with 240 and 800 grit emery papers, cleaned with deionized water and acetone, and dried in a stream of cool air. The ends of each specimen were machined screw threads of 8–10 mm.Nanchang (28°41′N, 115°53′E) was the represented area of acidic red clay soil in Southeast China, according to the USDA soil taxonomy. This region had a typical subtropical monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature, annual precipitation, and pH value of 17.7°C, 1600–1700 mm, and 3.90–4.35, respectively. The specimens were buried at a depth of 1 m in the region. In addition, analysis results revealed that the soil in the region where the specimens were buried had a chemical composition (wt%) of Cl− 0.0066, S
O
4
2
- 0.0058, and H
C
O
3
- 0.0010, a pH value of ~4.7, and a water content of 26% ± 2%. Specimens were buried for a total of 5 y (from June 2009 to May 2014).


## 2.2. Test Principle

Resistance is the basic attribute of metal material. The resistance of metal is calculated from (1), where R, ρ, l, and S are the resistance, resistivity, length, and sectional area of the specimen, respectively. Generally, the resistivity of a given metal is a constant, and therefore the resistance varies only with the geometry of the specimen. Furthermore, corrosion results in changes in the size of the specimen, and hence the ER changes. So, the corrosion depth can be calculated from the variation of ER.Figure1 shows the schematic of the dimensional variation of the clubbed X80 steel. If ρ and l are constant, then the resistance of the steel before (R
0) and after (R
1) corrosion is related through (2). Thus, the corrosion depth and corrosion rate can be calculated from (3) and (4). Here, h is corrosion depth (μm), r
0 and R
0 are the initial radius (mm) and resistance (μΩ) of the specimen, R
1 is resistance (μΩ) of the corroded specimen, and v and t are corrosion rate (mm/a) and time (y), respectively:(1)
R
=
ρ
l
S
,
(2)
R
0
R
1
=
r
1
r
0
2
=
1
-
h
r
0
2
,
(3)
h
=
r
0
1
-
R
0
R
1
,
(4)
v
=
h
t
.Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the dimension variation for clubbed X80 steel.Besides, the mass loss test was used in this work to evaluate the accuracy of the ER test. In the mass loss test, the corrosion rate was calculated from (5) [22], where v, Δ
W, S, ρ, and t are the corrosion rate (mm/a), weight loss (g), surface area (cm2) of the specimen, density of the steel (g/cm3), and time (h), respectively: (5)
v
=
8.46
×
10
4
Δ
W
S
t
ρ
.


## 2.3. Test Setup

In this work, the electrical resistance of the specimens was measured by a precision resistance test system developed in our laboratory. Figure2 shows the schematic of the electrical resistance test system and a photo of the fixture. As shown in Figure 2(b), the clubbed specimen was conducted with the wires through the fixture. The fixture consisted of copper nuts, brass bolts, and brass gaskets. Moreover, the fixtures were wrapped with PTFE film and epoxy resin in order to avoid the interference of soil on the conduction. This system allowed continuous in situ monitoring of the resistance of the steel specimen, with a precision of 0.1 μΩ. Besides, the system could monitor the variation of temperature and humidity and had the functions of data storage, data transmission, and temperature correction. The resistance displayed on the setup was the resistance corrected to 25°C.Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the electrical resistance test setup (a) and the photo of fixture (b) for clubbed X80 steel specimen in soil.
(a)
(b)


## 2.4. Surface Characterization

SEM (Quanta-200, FEI), EDS (INCA, Oxford), and XRD (D8-Advance, Bruker) were used to examine the morphology and determine the composition and phase structure of the corroded specimens, respectively.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Resistance Variation of X80 Steel

Figure3 shows the variation in the resistance of the X80 steel buried in acidic red soil for 52 weeks. As it is shown, the resistance increases with increasing corrosion time, although not at a constant rate; that is, the plot can be divided into three stages, namely, I, II, and III. The resistance increased slowly in the initial stage (I) and then rapidly from 8 to 38 weeks (stage II). After 38 weeks (stage III), the rate of increase slowed but was still greater than that of the initial stage.Figure 3
Variation curve of resistance addition for clubbed X80 steel in acidic red soil for 52 weeks.The variation in the resistance can be described by the parabolic law (6), where Δ
R
(
t
) is the added value of resistance at corrosion time t, and A, B, and C are constants, and |
A
| denotes the growth rate of the resistance. Table 1 shows the fitted values of A, B, and C for different stages of the resistance variation curve:(6)
Δ
R
t
=
A
t
2
+
B
t
+
C
.Table 1
Fitted values ofA, B, and C for the resistance variation curve.
Corrosion stage
Δ
R
(
t
)
=
A
t
2
+
B
t
+
C
A
B
C
I
−0.0171
0.1929
−0.1800
II
0.0326
−0.1839
0.7016
III
−0.0179
1.0964
−6.1214As shown in Table1, |
A
I
I
|
>
|
A
I
I
I
|
>
|
A
I
|, which indicates that the increase rate of the resistance is largest, and the corrosion is most severe in the second stage. It is well known that soils with low amounts of moisture have poor conductivity. The transmission of active ions is difficult in soils with low moisture and hence the corresponding reactive resistance is high [23, 24]. The backfilled soil has a water content of only 15%–18% as the evaporation when the soil is excavated. Therefore, the X80 steel corrodes only slightly and the resistance increases slowly when the specimens are initially buried. After a period (about 8 weeks), the properties of the soil near the specimens became similar to those of the soil surrounding the burial pit, owing to the physical, chemical, and atmospheric effects. In this stage, the amount of moisture and number of active ions increased significantly. The sites of low potential on the surface of the steel then corroded preferentially with the adsorption of active ions (Cl−, H
C
O
3
-, etc.) [25, 26], and hence the corrosion rate increased substantially in stage II (i.e., from 8 to 38 weeks). Furthermore, the thickness and density of the corrosion product layer increased gradually with increasing corrosion time. This resulted in an increase in the protective effect of the corrosion product on the steel, which led to a significant reduction in the average corrosion rate.


### 3.2. Corrosion Rate of X80 Steel

Figure4 shows the corrosion rate, as determined from the resistance variation of the X80 steel. As shown in Figure 4, the corrosion rate increases significantly up to 38 weeks and decreases thereafter, which is consistent with the variation in the resistance (Figure 3). The corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil decreases from 0.0902 mm/a at 38 weeks to 0.0226 mm/a after 5 years.Figure 4
Corrosion rate of clubbed X80 steel specimens in acidic red soil for 5 years.Besides, the corrosion rates calculated by the mass loss test are also shown in Figure4. These rates exhibit a high degree of correspondence, except for a slight deviation in the initial stage of corrosion. The specimens were homogenized in the principle of ER test technique, which was used to measure the general corrosion, and hence errors may have been generated when this technique was used to measure localized corrosion. General and localized corrosion should both occur when pipeline steel is buried in acidic soils [10, 11, 27]. Localized corrosion may be especially dominant in the initial stage, but severe general corrosion occurs with increasing corrosion time. Therefore, in the final stage of corrosion, the resistance and mass loss tests yield very similar corrosion rates, that is, a correspondence of 98.4% at 5 y. The present work shows that ER test technique was effective in continuously measuring the variation in the corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil.


### 3.3. Morphology and Chemical Composition

Figure5(a) shows the sectional morphology and Table 2 lists the corresponding chemical composition of the corrosion product layer formed on X80 steel after 24 weeks. As shown in Figure 5(a), the corrosion product layer consists of two loose layers, namely, a thin inner layer and a thick outer layer. There were also many microholes in this product layer, and part of the outer product had peeled off. This indicated that the product layer offered only a low level of protection at 24 weeks, and the active ions in the red soil could continuously corrode the steel by passing through the microcracks.Table 2
Composition of corrosion product (Figure5(a)) on X80 steel in red soil for 24 weeks.
Spectrum position
Element (mass %)
Fe
O
C
Mn
Ca
Spec. 2 (outer layer)
28.51
44.52
11.63
—
14.83
Spec. 3 (inner layer)
52.71
38.59
6.8
1.19
0.71Figure 5
Sectional morphology (a) and XRD pattern (b) of corrosion product layers on X80 steel in red soil for 24 weeks.
(a)
(b)In addition, XRD patterns of the corrosion product layers were shown in Figure5(b). Table 2 and Figure 5(b) revealed that the outer layer had an Fe/O atomic ratio of 0.183 and a phase composition of FeO(OH), FeCO3, and a small amount of γ-Fe2O3. This ratio and composition indicated that the outer corrosion product might be a mixture of FeO(OH) and FeCO3. However, the Fe/O atomic ratio (0.390) and the higher intensity of the diffraction peak of FeCO3 suggest that the inner corrosion products are composed mainly of FeCO3. Furthermore, the Ca in the product layer originated primarily from the red clay soil. The migration path of this Ca was lengthened owing to the presence of the outer corrosion products and hence was present in only very low quantities in the inner product layer.The sectional morphology, chemical composition, and phase composition of the corrosion product formed after 5 years were shown in Figure6. This corrosion product layer had an average thickness of ~120 μm, was more compact than that formed in 24 weeks, and consisted of only a single layer. However, it still contained many microcracks, especially at the sites near the substrate. The EDS spectrum (Figure 6(a)) showed that this layer had a uniform distribution of elements with Fe and O contents of ~65% and 30%, which varied only slightly from the outside to the inside. Moreover, the XRD spectrum (Figure 6(b)) showed that this corrosion product layer was composed of FeOOH, γ-Fe2O3, FeCO3, and a small amount of Fe3O4.Figure 6
Sectional morphology and element composition (a) and XRD pattern (b) of corrosion product layers on X80 steel in red soil for 5 years.
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. Analysis of Corrosion Behavior

The anodic and cathodic reactions of X80 steel in red soil involve the dissolution of steel and the reduction of oxygen, respectively [3, 11, 27]. The main reactions are as follows:(7)
O
2
+
4
H
+
+
4
e
⟶
2
H
2
O
(8)
F
e
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
2
e
(9)
F
e
2
+
+
2
H
2
O
⟶
F
e
O
H
2
+
2
H
+
(10)
F
e
+
H
C
O
3
-
⟶
F
e
C
O
3
+
H
+
+
2
eThe corrosion product film formed gradually on the steel surface with the accumulation ofF
e
O
H
2 and F
e
C
O
3. This film prevented the transport of active ions and thereby increased the reaction resistance. In addition, the XRD results indicated that the F
e
O
H
2 was unstable and therefore generated other products through the following reactions:(11)
4
F
e
O
H
2
+
O
2
+
2
H
2
O
⟶
4
F
e
O
H
3
(12)
F
e
O
H
3
⟶
F
e
O
O
H
+
H
2
O
(13)
2
F
e
O
O
H
⟶
2
F
e
2
O
3
+
H
2
O
(14)
6
F
e
O
H
2
+
O
2
⟶
2
F
e
3
O
4
+
6
H
2
OHowever, the following reactions occurred simultaneously in the presence ofH
+:(15)
F
e
C
O
3
+
H
+
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
H
C
O
3
-
(16)
F
e
O
O
H
+
3
H
+
+
e
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
2
H
2
OOwing to reactions (15) and (16), the corrosion product film became loose and many microcracks formed therein. In addition, the oxygen in the crevices of the corrosion product film was consumed gradually, but the sample was in full contact with the soil during the corrosion process [28]. The transfer rate of the oxygen in the crevices could not meet the requirement of the cathodic reaction, and hence an oxygen concentration cell formed; this resulted in the steel substrate being corroded preferentially under the crevices. As the corrosion progressed, the corrosion pores became active regions, and the accumulation of reactive ions in these regions resulted in a decrease in the reaction resistance. Besides, the dissolution of defects in the product film increased with the adsorption of Cl− (from the red soil) on these regions. These combined effects intensified the corrosion of X80 steel and transformed into severe general corrosion in the final stage.


## 3.1. Resistance Variation of X80 Steel

Figure3 shows the variation in the resistance of the X80 steel buried in acidic red soil for 52 weeks. As it is shown, the resistance increases with increasing corrosion time, although not at a constant rate; that is, the plot can be divided into three stages, namely, I, II, and III. The resistance increased slowly in the initial stage (I) and then rapidly from 8 to 38 weeks (stage II). After 38 weeks (stage III), the rate of increase slowed but was still greater than that of the initial stage.Figure 3
Variation curve of resistance addition for clubbed X80 steel in acidic red soil for 52 weeks.The variation in the resistance can be described by the parabolic law (6), where Δ
R
(
t
) is the added value of resistance at corrosion time t, and A, B, and C are constants, and |
A
| denotes the growth rate of the resistance. Table 1 shows the fitted values of A, B, and C for different stages of the resistance variation curve:(6)
Δ
R
t
=
A
t
2
+
B
t
+
C
.Table 1
Fitted values ofA, B, and C for the resistance variation curve.
Corrosion stage
Δ
R
(
t
)
=
A
t
2
+
B
t
+
C
A
B
C
I
−0.0171
0.1929
−0.1800
II
0.0326
−0.1839
0.7016
III
−0.0179
1.0964
−6.1214As shown in Table1, |
A
I
I
|
>
|
A
I
I
I
|
>
|
A
I
|, which indicates that the increase rate of the resistance is largest, and the corrosion is most severe in the second stage. It is well known that soils with low amounts of moisture have poor conductivity. The transmission of active ions is difficult in soils with low moisture and hence the corresponding reactive resistance is high [23, 24]. The backfilled soil has a water content of only 15%–18% as the evaporation when the soil is excavated. Therefore, the X80 steel corrodes only slightly and the resistance increases slowly when the specimens are initially buried. After a period (about 8 weeks), the properties of the soil near the specimens became similar to those of the soil surrounding the burial pit, owing to the physical, chemical, and atmospheric effects. In this stage, the amount of moisture and number of active ions increased significantly. The sites of low potential on the surface of the steel then corroded preferentially with the adsorption of active ions (Cl−, H
C
O
3
-, etc.) [25, 26], and hence the corrosion rate increased substantially in stage II (i.e., from 8 to 38 weeks). Furthermore, the thickness and density of the corrosion product layer increased gradually with increasing corrosion time. This resulted in an increase in the protective effect of the corrosion product on the steel, which led to a significant reduction in the average corrosion rate.


## 3.2. Corrosion Rate of X80 Steel

Figure4 shows the corrosion rate, as determined from the resistance variation of the X80 steel. As shown in Figure 4, the corrosion rate increases significantly up to 38 weeks and decreases thereafter, which is consistent with the variation in the resistance (Figure 3). The corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil decreases from 0.0902 mm/a at 38 weeks to 0.0226 mm/a after 5 years.Figure 4
Corrosion rate of clubbed X80 steel specimens in acidic red soil for 5 years.Besides, the corrosion rates calculated by the mass loss test are also shown in Figure4. These rates exhibit a high degree of correspondence, except for a slight deviation in the initial stage of corrosion. The specimens were homogenized in the principle of ER test technique, which was used to measure the general corrosion, and hence errors may have been generated when this technique was used to measure localized corrosion. General and localized corrosion should both occur when pipeline steel is buried in acidic soils [10, 11, 27]. Localized corrosion may be especially dominant in the initial stage, but severe general corrosion occurs with increasing corrosion time. Therefore, in the final stage of corrosion, the resistance and mass loss tests yield very similar corrosion rates, that is, a correspondence of 98.4% at 5 y. The present work shows that ER test technique was effective in continuously measuring the variation in the corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil.


## 3.3. Morphology and Chemical Composition

Figure5(a) shows the sectional morphology and Table 2 lists the corresponding chemical composition of the corrosion product layer formed on X80 steel after 24 weeks. As shown in Figure 5(a), the corrosion product layer consists of two loose layers, namely, a thin inner layer and a thick outer layer. There were also many microholes in this product layer, and part of the outer product had peeled off. This indicated that the product layer offered only a low level of protection at 24 weeks, and the active ions in the red soil could continuously corrode the steel by passing through the microcracks.Table 2
Composition of corrosion product (Figure5(a)) on X80 steel in red soil for 24 weeks.
Spectrum position
Element (mass %)
Fe
O
C
Mn
Ca
Spec. 2 (outer layer)
28.51
44.52
11.63
—
14.83
Spec. 3 (inner layer)
52.71
38.59
6.8
1.19
0.71Figure 5
Sectional morphology (a) and XRD pattern (b) of corrosion product layers on X80 steel in red soil for 24 weeks.
(a)
(b)In addition, XRD patterns of the corrosion product layers were shown in Figure5(b). Table 2 and Figure 5(b) revealed that the outer layer had an Fe/O atomic ratio of 0.183 and a phase composition of FeO(OH), FeCO3, and a small amount of γ-Fe2O3. This ratio and composition indicated that the outer corrosion product might be a mixture of FeO(OH) and FeCO3. However, the Fe/O atomic ratio (0.390) and the higher intensity of the diffraction peak of FeCO3 suggest that the inner corrosion products are composed mainly of FeCO3. Furthermore, the Ca in the product layer originated primarily from the red clay soil. The migration path of this Ca was lengthened owing to the presence of the outer corrosion products and hence was present in only very low quantities in the inner product layer.The sectional morphology, chemical composition, and phase composition of the corrosion product formed after 5 years were shown in Figure6. This corrosion product layer had an average thickness of ~120 μm, was more compact than that formed in 24 weeks, and consisted of only a single layer. However, it still contained many microcracks, especially at the sites near the substrate. The EDS spectrum (Figure 6(a)) showed that this layer had a uniform distribution of elements with Fe and O contents of ~65% and 30%, which varied only slightly from the outside to the inside. Moreover, the XRD spectrum (Figure 6(b)) showed that this corrosion product layer was composed of FeOOH, γ-Fe2O3, FeCO3, and a small amount of Fe3O4.Figure 6
Sectional morphology and element composition (a) and XRD pattern (b) of corrosion product layers on X80 steel in red soil for 5 years.
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. Analysis of Corrosion Behavior

The anodic and cathodic reactions of X80 steel in red soil involve the dissolution of steel and the reduction of oxygen, respectively [3, 11, 27]. The main reactions are as follows:(7)
O
2
+
4
H
+
+
4
e
⟶
2
H
2
O
(8)
F
e
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
2
e
(9)
F
e
2
+
+
2
H
2
O
⟶
F
e
O
H
2
+
2
H
+
(10)
F
e
+
H
C
O
3
-
⟶
F
e
C
O
3
+
H
+
+
2
eThe corrosion product film formed gradually on the steel surface with the accumulation ofF
e
O
H
2 and F
e
C
O
3. This film prevented the transport of active ions and thereby increased the reaction resistance. In addition, the XRD results indicated that the F
e
O
H
2 was unstable and therefore generated other products through the following reactions:(11)
4
F
e
O
H
2
+
O
2
+
2
H
2
O
⟶
4
F
e
O
H
3
(12)
F
e
O
H
3
⟶
F
e
O
O
H
+
H
2
O
(13)
2
F
e
O
O
H
⟶
2
F
e
2
O
3
+
H
2
O
(14)
6
F
e
O
H
2
+
O
2
⟶
2
F
e
3
O
4
+
6
H
2
OHowever, the following reactions occurred simultaneously in the presence ofH
+:(15)
F
e
C
O
3
+
H
+
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
H
C
O
3
-
(16)
F
e
O
O
H
+
3
H
+
+
e
⟶
F
e
2
+
+
2
H
2
OOwing to reactions (15) and (16), the corrosion product film became loose and many microcracks formed therein. In addition, the oxygen in the crevices of the corrosion product film was consumed gradually, but the sample was in full contact with the soil during the corrosion process [28]. The transfer rate of the oxygen in the crevices could not meet the requirement of the cathodic reaction, and hence an oxygen concentration cell formed; this resulted in the steel substrate being corroded preferentially under the crevices. As the corrosion progressed, the corrosion pores became active regions, and the accumulation of reactive ions in these regions resulted in a decrease in the reaction resistance. Besides, the dissolution of defects in the product film increased with the adsorption of Cl− (from the red soil) on these regions. These combined effects intensified the corrosion of X80 steel and transformed into severe general corrosion in the final stage.


## 4. Conclusion

The corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil was determined based on the corresponding variation in resistance. In addition, electrical resistance and mass loss tests yielded very similar rates; a correspondence of up to 98.4% was obtained in the final stage of corrosion. Therefore, the electrical resistance test technique constitutes an effective means for continuously in situ monitoring of the corrosion kinetics of X80 steel in acidic red soil.The corrosion rate of X80 steel in acidic red soil was about 0.0902 mm/a at 38 weeks, but the corrosion rate was dropped to 0.0226 mm/a after 5 years. Moreover, when X80 steel was exposed to acidic red soil for 24 weeks, a corrosion product layer consisting of two loose layers formed. The outer corrosion product was a mixture of FeO(OH) and FeCO3, whereas the inner product was composed mainly of FeCO3. However, after 5 years, the product layer consisted of only a single layer that was composed of FeOOH, γ-Fe2O3, FeCO3, and a small amount of Fe3O4.



---

*Source: 931761-2015-06-23.xml*