# Synthesis and Characterization of CeO2-SiO2 Nanoparticles by Microwave-Assisted Irradiation Method for Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methylene Blue Dye

Authors: R. M. Mohamed; E. S. Aazam
Journal: International Journal of Photoenergy
 (2012)

---

## Abstract

CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized for the first time by a facile microwave-assisted irradiation process. The effect of irradiation time of microwave was studied. The materials were characterized by N2 adsorption, XRD, UV-vis/DR, and TEM. All solids showed mesoporous textures with high surface areas, relatively small pore size diameters, and large pore volume. The X-ray diffraction results indicated that the as-synthesized nanoparticles exhibited cubic CeO2 without impurities and amorphous silica. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed that the particle size of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles, which were prepared by microwave method for 30 min irradiation times, was around 8 nm. The photocatalytic activities were evaluated by the decomposition of methylene blue dye under UV light irradiations. The results showed that the irradiation under the microwave produced CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles, which have the best crystallinity under a shorter irradiation time. This indicates that the introduction of the microwave really can save energy and time with faster kinetics of crystallization. The sample prepared by 30 min microwave irradiation time exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity. The photocatalytic activity of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles, which were prepared by 30 min irradiation times was found to have better performance than commercial reference P25.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Dye pollutants from textile papers and other industries are important sources of environmental contamination. Conventional treatment of such wastewater generally involves coagulation/flocculation [1, 2], electrocoagulation [3], coagulation/carbon adsorption process [4], and so on. These methods, however, merely transfer dyes from the liquid phase to the solid phase, requiring further treatment and causing secondary pollution [5]. Photocatalytic degradation of them continues to attract interest as a method to mitigate their impact on the environment. When photocatalyst is excited, it produces photogenerated holes in the valence band and the photogenerated electrons in the conduction band. Photogenerated holes have strong oxidation power, which are widely studied for environmental cleaning [6–10]. One important application of photocatalyst in environment cleaning is degradation of organic pollutants in waste water, especially those from the textile and the photographic industries. The photocatalysis technology has several advantages over other processes, such as cost-effectiveness, the use of ultraviolet (UV), near-UV or solar light as energy source, no addition of other chemicals, the operation at near room temperature, the capability of efficiently mineralizing most organic compounds, and the simple implementation with other conventional technologies to form a hybrid system [11]. Among these catalysts, TiO2 has been proved to be a competent photocatalyst for environmental applications because of its strong oxidizing ability, nontoxicity, and long-term stability [6–10]. However, TiO2 with a band gap of 3.0–3.2 eV can be photoexcited under irradiation of UV light (λ<395 nm), which is only about 2–4% of sunlight [12]. Therefore, considerable effort has been made to increase the absorption of TiO2 in the visible region to improve its visible light response through various surface modifications such as doping of various metal or metal oxides [13–17].Dyes such as methylene blue (MB) are the main organic pollutants from dyeing and printing, textile industries, paper and ink manufacturing industries, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, denim industries, food industries, and so on [18]. Methylene blue (MB), a common organic dye, was selected as a target compound because MB is ubiquitously used and the removal of the dye from wastewaters has been an acute problem [19]. Li et al. found that, during liquid-phase photocatalytic degradation of MB under visible light irradiation (>420 nm), the as-prepared S-doped TiO2 exhibited much higher activity than pure TiO2 [20].We know that a rare-earth oxide such as CeO2 has been applied widely in many fields. The applications of ceria are in solid oxide fuel cells, oxygen gas sensors, fluorescent materials, acting as the three-way catalysts in vehicle emission control systems, ultraviolet blocking materials, gates for metal-oxide semiconductor devices and phosphors, and so forth [21–24]. Furthermore, nanocrystalline CeO2-based materials not only benefit from those applications, but also possess some unique properties, including lattice expansion [25], transition from boundary diffusion to lattice diffusion [26], and blue shift in ultraviolet absorption spectra [27]. Therefore, it is of critical importance to regulate the size and shape to explore its novel applications and properties. Up to now, big efforts have been devoted to the chemical synthesis of CeO2 nanomaterials with various morphologies and sizes, such as porous structures, films, nanoparticles, and so forth [28–44]. The development of efficient methods to synthesize nanostructures with well-defined size and shape is one of the key trends in material chemistry because of their size/shape-dependent properties and potential applications. In the past few years, some effective methods have been developed to prepare monodispersed CeO2 with different shapes. For example, nanocubes were prepared by a two-step precipitation method using oleic acid as a capping agent [45], nanopolyhedrals and nanocubes were synthesized via the decanoic acid-assisted supercritical hydrothermal process at 400°C [46], and nanopolyhedrons were obtained by the thermolysis reaction of cerium benzoylacetonate complex in oleic acid/oleylamine solvents under vacuum condition at 310–330°C [47]. However, the above methods required complicated procedure, special equipments, or organometallic precursor. So it still remains a great challenge to fabricate ceria nanocrystals with uniform size and well-defined crystal shape by a simple and economical method. Here in this study, we report the synthesis of nanocrystalline CeO2-SiO2 by a microwave-assisted irradiation process for the first time. The synthesized nanocrystalline CeO2-SiO2 samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS). The photocatalytic activities of CeO2-SiO2 were investigated by the degradation of methylene blue dye under the irradiations of UV light.


## 2. Experimental

The dye under investigation, namely, methylene blue (MB), with a labeled purity of more than 90% was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Deionized water was used to make the dye solutions of desired concentration.


### 2.1. Catalyst Preparation and Characterization

All chemicals were of reagent grade without further purification. Ce-Si binary oxide was synthesized by a microwave method according to the following procedure: 1.4 g hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was added gradually to 10 g tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich) solution and the mixture was stirred at 60°C for 10 min till the CTAB was completely dissolved. 2.5 g of hexahydrated cerium nitrate (Ce(NO3)3-6H2O, Alfa Aesar) dissolved in ethanol (18.0 g) was subsequently added to the mixture of CTAB and TEOS and continually stirred for further 10 min at 60°C. The solution was cooled to room temperature and 1 mL aqueous HCl (0.05 mol L−1) was added and stirred for 2 h. The above mixtures were poured into the Teflon lined digestion vessel, where vessel cover acts as an overpressure release valve surrounded by a safety shield and then heated by a microwave synthesizer (ETHOS TC from Milestone Inc.) and maintained at 160°C for different times.The resultant precipitates were collected by centrifugation, washed by the deionized water and then dried at 80°C for 24 h to gain precursors.At last, the precursors were heat treated at 500°C for about 4 h at a ramping rate of 0.5°C min−1 to obtain CeO2-SiO2. The samples obtained under 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min microwave irradiation are denoted as M-30 min, M-60 min, M-90 min, M-120 min, and M-180 min, respectively. As a comparative study, a conventional hydrothermal process was used as a preparation method (H, reaction temperature: 160°C, reaction time: 24 h, calcination temperature: 500°C for 4 h at a ramping rate of 0.5°C min−1). The obtained CeO2-SiO2 sample was denoted as H-24 h. TiO2 P25 from Degussa was employed as a standard photocatalyst for comparison purpose. It consists of mainly anatase phase (ca. 80%), non-porous polyhedral particles of ca. 25 nm mean size, and a BET surface area of ca. 50 m2 g−1.


### 2.2. Characterization

To determine the crystallite sizes and identities of CeO2-SiO2, all the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS). The XRD measurements were performed on a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer system equipped with as RINT 2000 wide-angle goniometer using Cu Kα radiation and a power of 40 kV × 30 mA. The intensity data were collected at 25°C over a 2θ range of 10–80°. TEM images were obtained on Hitachi H-9500 operated at 300kv. UV-vis diffuse reflectance absorption spectra were recorded in air at room temperature in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm using a Shimadzu UV-2450 at 295 K. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface areas were determined from N2-adsorption measurements at 77 K using Nova 2000 series, Chromatech. Prior to analysis, the samples were outgased at 250°C for 4 h.


### 2.3. Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

A set of photocatalytic degradation experiments of methylene blue (100 ppm) was carried out by photoreactor under UV light irradiation. The light source for photocatalysis was a mercury lamp (150 W high pressure). The catalysts and solution were separated by filtration; the collected samples were analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2450). The photodegradation efficiency of methylene blue has been calculated by applying the following equation:(1)%photodegradationefficiency=(Co-C)Co×100,
where Co is the original methylene blue content, C is the retained methylene blue in solution.


## 2.1. Catalyst Preparation and Characterization

All chemicals were of reagent grade without further purification. Ce-Si binary oxide was synthesized by a microwave method according to the following procedure: 1.4 g hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) was added gradually to 10 g tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, Aldrich) solution and the mixture was stirred at 60°C for 10 min till the CTAB was completely dissolved. 2.5 g of hexahydrated cerium nitrate (Ce(NO3)3-6H2O, Alfa Aesar) dissolved in ethanol (18.0 g) was subsequently added to the mixture of CTAB and TEOS and continually stirred for further 10 min at 60°C. The solution was cooled to room temperature and 1 mL aqueous HCl (0.05 mol L−1) was added and stirred for 2 h. The above mixtures were poured into the Teflon lined digestion vessel, where vessel cover acts as an overpressure release valve surrounded by a safety shield and then heated by a microwave synthesizer (ETHOS TC from Milestone Inc.) and maintained at 160°C for different times.The resultant precipitates were collected by centrifugation, washed by the deionized water and then dried at 80°C for 24 h to gain precursors.At last, the precursors were heat treated at 500°C for about 4 h at a ramping rate of 0.5°C min−1 to obtain CeO2-SiO2. The samples obtained under 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min microwave irradiation are denoted as M-30 min, M-60 min, M-90 min, M-120 min, and M-180 min, respectively. As a comparative study, a conventional hydrothermal process was used as a preparation method (H, reaction temperature: 160°C, reaction time: 24 h, calcination temperature: 500°C for 4 h at a ramping rate of 0.5°C min−1). The obtained CeO2-SiO2 sample was denoted as H-24 h. TiO2 P25 from Degussa was employed as a standard photocatalyst for comparison purpose. It consists of mainly anatase phase (ca. 80%), non-porous polyhedral particles of ca. 25 nm mean size, and a BET surface area of ca. 50 m2 g−1.


## 2.2. Characterization

To determine the crystallite sizes and identities of CeO2-SiO2, all the samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS). The XRD measurements were performed on a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer system equipped with as RINT 2000 wide-angle goniometer using Cu Kα radiation and a power of 40 kV × 30 mA. The intensity data were collected at 25°C over a 2θ range of 10–80°. TEM images were obtained on Hitachi H-9500 operated at 300kv. UV-vis diffuse reflectance absorption spectra were recorded in air at room temperature in the wavelength range of 200–800 nm using a Shimadzu UV-2450 at 295 K. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) surface areas were determined from N2-adsorption measurements at 77 K using Nova 2000 series, Chromatech. Prior to analysis, the samples were outgased at 250°C for 4 h.


## 2.3. Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

A set of photocatalytic degradation experiments of methylene blue (100 ppm) was carried out by photoreactor under UV light irradiation. The light source for photocatalysis was a mercury lamp (150 W high pressure). The catalysts and solution were separated by filtration; the collected samples were analyzed by UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2450). The photodegradation efficiency of methylene blue has been calculated by applying the following equation:(1)%photodegradationefficiency=(Co-C)Co×100,
where Co is the original methylene blue content, C is the retained methylene blue in solution.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. Evaluation and Characterization of Synthesized Materials

#### 3.1.1. Phase Analysis

All the obtained peaks in the pattern of Figure1 belong only to CeO2. No other peaks related to impurities were detected, which confirm that the synthesized nanoparticles are pure CeO2 with cubic phase [47]. It was observed from the XRD patterns that with the increase of the treatment time, intensity of XRD peaks increased and full width at half maximum decreased, indicating the enhancement of the crystallinity and crystallite size. Compared with the conventional hydrothermal route, the irradiation under the microwave produces a better crystallinity in a shorter treatment time (30 min), which is a good evidence that the introduction of the microwave really can save energy and time with faster kinetics of crystallization [48–50]. The particle sizes were calculated from (1 1 1) peak using Scherrer’s formula D=kλ/βcosθ, where D  is the average grain size, k a constant equal to 0.89, λ the wavelength of X-rays and β is the corrected half width. The calculated average crystallite sizes of the samples are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1
The calculated average crystallite sizes of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Average crystallite sizes (nm)
M-30 min
8
M-60 min
10
M-90 min
11
M-120 min
12
M-180 min
14
H-24 h
15
P25
25Figure 1
X-ray diffraction patterns of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


#### 3.1.2. Surface Area Analysis

The CeO2-SiO2 samples are characterized by specific surface area SBET as shown in Table 2, which indicates that the increase of irradiation time decreases surface area and surface area of sample prepared by microwave method is higher than that prepared by the hydrothermal method. The parameters of surface area and the data calculated from the t-plot are collected in Table 2. The obtained results from the N2-adsorption isotherms for CeO2-SiO2 samples indicate that both are typical of mesoporous solids type IV as shown in Figure 2. However, a decrease in the adsorption capacity of the CeO2-SiO2 samples was observed after increase irradiation time of the microwave. Furthermore, it was noticed that the total pore volume of M-30 min sample had the highest value. The values of SBET and St are generally close in most samples indicating the presence of mesopores.Table 2
Texture parameters of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
S
t (m2/g)
S
micro (cm2/g)
S
ext (cm2/g)
V
p (cm3/g)
V
micro (cm3/g)
V
meso (cm3/g)
r (Å)
M-30 min
335
340
240
95
0.59
0.090
0.500
5.58
M-60 min
300
320
210
90
0.58
0.085
0.495
5.57
M-90 min
236
250
170
66
0.44
0.050
0.390
5.56
M-120 min
118
130
95
23
0.30
0.040
0.260
5.55
M-180 min
100
110
85
15
0.28
0.030
0.250
5.54
H-24 h
90
10
77
13
0.26
0.020
0.240
5.53
P25
50
—
—
—
—
—
—
—N
2 adsorption and desorption isotherm for CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


#### 3.1.3. UV-Vis-DRS Analysis

The optical properties of synthesized CeO2-SiO2 samples were examined by UV-visible spectrophotometer, and the results are displayed in Figure 3. The results reveal an increase in absorbency in the visible light region parallel to the declining irradiation time of the examined systems. Therefore, the study of UV-vis radiation absorption is an important tool for the evaluation of the changes in the produced semiconductor materials by different treatments. Further, the band gap energy was calculated on the basis of the maximum absorption band of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles according to (2). 										(2)Eg=1240λ,
where Eg is the band gap energy, and λ is the lower cutoff wavelength (nm) of the photocatalyst. The values of Eg, the band gap of the CeO2-SiO2 samples, are compiled in Table 3.Table 3
The band gap energy of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Band gap energy (eV)
M-30 min
3.25
M-60 min
3.32
M-90 min
3.42
M-120 min
3.55
M-180 min
4.02
H-24 h
4.10Figure 3
UV-vis spectra of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


#### 3.1.4. TEM Observation

With the aid of transmission electron microscope, size and morphology of as-synthesized samples were recorded. Based on the results of photocatalytic activity as given in Section3.2.1, the highest catalytic activity was observed for the sample M-30, and the respective samples M-30 and H-24 were subjected to TEM analysis. The corresponding TEM analysis is shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). The results show that the shape of the CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by hydrothermal method is spherical shape particles with size of about 15 nm. But the shape of CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by microwave method for 30 min irradiation time is nanocubes with size of about 8 nm. These findings suggest that the shape and size of nanoparticles depend essentially on the preparation method.TEM images of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by (a) 30 min different irradiation times and (b) hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)


### 3.2. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity

#### 3.2.1. Effect of Preparation Method and Irradiation Time on Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye

Within the frame of the present study, the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye was taken as a probe reaction to test the catalytic activity of the system under consideration and Figure5 shows the effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue dye.Figure 5
Effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocalytic efficiency percentage of methylene blue dye.A keen insight into the obtained results, one could observe the following.The highest value of degradation was M-30. The variation in activity should be due to the differences in physical properties such as band gap, particle size, and surface texture. The photocatalytic activities in relation to other obtained physical properties (SBET, band gap, Vp, and crystallite sizes) are compiled in Table 4.Table 4
Effect of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles on the photoactivity.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
Band gap eV
MB removal efficiency, %
V
p (cm3/g)
Crystallite size, nm
M-30 min
335
3.25
93
0.59
8
M-60 min
300
3.32
90
0.58
10
M-90 min
236
3.42
89
0.44
11
M-120 min
118
3.55
88
0.30
12
M-180 min
100
4.02
87
0.28
14
H-24 h
90
4.10
85
0.26
15A maximum photocatalytic activity is found for M-30, where the surface area and pore volume own the maximum values counter to the band gap values. One could explain such increase due to a decrease in energy to exit electron from conduction band to valence band. Also, the M-30 min has the best photoactivity, since it has the lowest band gap and particle size and the highest surface area and pore volume.


#### 3.2.2. Factors Affecting on Photocatalytic Activity

Effect of pH
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of pH on MB removal efficiency under the following conditions: 0.3 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 100 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. The findings are summarized in Table5. The results indicate that increasing the pH of MB solution from 3 to 7 leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 93 to 96.0%, but at pH more than 7, the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The possible reason for this behavior is that alkaline pH range favours the formation of more OH radical due to the presence of large quantity of OH− ions in the alkaline medium, which enhances the photocatalytic degradation of MB significantly [51]. The optimum condition for pH is 7 at which photodegradation percentage of MB reach to 96%.Table 5
Effect of pH of MB solution on MB removal efficiency.
pH of MB
MB  removal efficiency, %
3
93.0
4
95.0
7
96.0
9
96.2Effect of MB Concentration
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of the MB concentration on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at pH 7. The results are summarized in Table5. It can be seen that increasing MB concentration from 100 to 200 ppm has no significant effect on MB removal efficiency, but at a concentration higher than 200 ppm, the MB removal efficiency was decreased. The optimum condition for MB concentration is 200 ppm at MB removal efficiency of 96% (see Table 6).Table 6
Effect of MB concentration on MB removal efficiency.
MB concentration, ppm
MB removal efficiency, %
100
96.0
150
96.0
200
96.0
300
90.0
400
95.0Effect of Catalyst/MB Solution Ratio
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at MB concentration of 200 ppm. The findings are shown in Figure6. The results indicate that increasing the catalyst/MB solution ratio from 0.2 to 0.4 g/L leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 96.0 to 99.9%, respectively, but at a catalyst/MB solution ratio more than 0.4 g/L the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The optimum condition of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L is 0.4 at 99.9% MB removal efficiency.Figure 6
Effect of loading of optimum CeO2-SiO2 sample on MB removal efficiency percentage.Comparison between Photocatalytic Activity of CeO2-SiO2 and TiO2 Degussa
Finally, in the present study, a series of experiments has been carried out in order to compare the photocatalytic activity of optimum sample (M-30 min) and commercial reference P25 under the following conditions: 0.4 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 200 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. We found the photocatalytic activity of M-30 min and P25 are 99.9 and 94%, respectively. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles which prepared by 30 min irradiation time was found to have a better performance than the commercial reference P25. Because the surface area of CeO2-SiO2 (335 m2/gm) is higher than that of P25 (50 m2/gm). It is concluded that the synthesized CeO2-SiO2 is one of the best candidate for environmental applications as a photocatalyst.


## 3.1. Evaluation and Characterization of Synthesized Materials

### 3.1.1. Phase Analysis

All the obtained peaks in the pattern of Figure1 belong only to CeO2. No other peaks related to impurities were detected, which confirm that the synthesized nanoparticles are pure CeO2 with cubic phase [47]. It was observed from the XRD patterns that with the increase of the treatment time, intensity of XRD peaks increased and full width at half maximum decreased, indicating the enhancement of the crystallinity and crystallite size. Compared with the conventional hydrothermal route, the irradiation under the microwave produces a better crystallinity in a shorter treatment time (30 min), which is a good evidence that the introduction of the microwave really can save energy and time with faster kinetics of crystallization [48–50]. The particle sizes were calculated from (1 1 1) peak using Scherrer’s formula D=kλ/βcosθ, where D  is the average grain size, k a constant equal to 0.89, λ the wavelength of X-rays and β is the corrected half width. The calculated average crystallite sizes of the samples are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1
The calculated average crystallite sizes of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Average crystallite sizes (nm)
M-30 min
8
M-60 min
10
M-90 min
11
M-120 min
12
M-180 min
14
H-24 h
15
P25
25Figure 1
X-ray diffraction patterns of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


### 3.1.2. Surface Area Analysis

The CeO2-SiO2 samples are characterized by specific surface area SBET as shown in Table 2, which indicates that the increase of irradiation time decreases surface area and surface area of sample prepared by microwave method is higher than that prepared by the hydrothermal method. The parameters of surface area and the data calculated from the t-plot are collected in Table 2. The obtained results from the N2-adsorption isotherms for CeO2-SiO2 samples indicate that both are typical of mesoporous solids type IV as shown in Figure 2. However, a decrease in the adsorption capacity of the CeO2-SiO2 samples was observed after increase irradiation time of the microwave. Furthermore, it was noticed that the total pore volume of M-30 min sample had the highest value. The values of SBET and St are generally close in most samples indicating the presence of mesopores.Table 2
Texture parameters of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
S
t (m2/g)
S
micro (cm2/g)
S
ext (cm2/g)
V
p (cm3/g)
V
micro (cm3/g)
V
meso (cm3/g)
r (Å)
M-30 min
335
340
240
95
0.59
0.090
0.500
5.58
M-60 min
300
320
210
90
0.58
0.085
0.495
5.57
M-90 min
236
250
170
66
0.44
0.050
0.390
5.56
M-120 min
118
130
95
23
0.30
0.040
0.260
5.55
M-180 min
100
110
85
15
0.28
0.030
0.250
5.54
H-24 h
90
10
77
13
0.26
0.020
0.240
5.53
P25
50
—
—
—
—
—
—
—N
2 adsorption and desorption isotherm for CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


### 3.1.3. UV-Vis-DRS Analysis

The optical properties of synthesized CeO2-SiO2 samples were examined by UV-visible spectrophotometer, and the results are displayed in Figure 3. The results reveal an increase in absorbency in the visible light region parallel to the declining irradiation time of the examined systems. Therefore, the study of UV-vis radiation absorption is an important tool for the evaluation of the changes in the produced semiconductor materials by different treatments. Further, the band gap energy was calculated on the basis of the maximum absorption band of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles according to (2). 										(2)Eg=1240λ,
where Eg is the band gap energy, and λ is the lower cutoff wavelength (nm) of the photocatalyst. The values of Eg, the band gap of the CeO2-SiO2 samples, are compiled in Table 3.Table 3
The band gap energy of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Band gap energy (eV)
M-30 min
3.25
M-60 min
3.32
M-90 min
3.42
M-120 min
3.55
M-180 min
4.02
H-24 h
4.10Figure 3
UV-vis spectra of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


### 3.1.4. TEM Observation

With the aid of transmission electron microscope, size and morphology of as-synthesized samples were recorded. Based on the results of photocatalytic activity as given in Section3.2.1, the highest catalytic activity was observed for the sample M-30, and the respective samples M-30 and H-24 were subjected to TEM analysis. The corresponding TEM analysis is shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). The results show that the shape of the CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by hydrothermal method is spherical shape particles with size of about 15 nm. But the shape of CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by microwave method for 30 min irradiation time is nanocubes with size of about 8 nm. These findings suggest that the shape and size of nanoparticles depend essentially on the preparation method.TEM images of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by (a) 30 min different irradiation times and (b) hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)


## 3.1.1. Phase Analysis

All the obtained peaks in the pattern of Figure1 belong only to CeO2. No other peaks related to impurities were detected, which confirm that the synthesized nanoparticles are pure CeO2 with cubic phase [47]. It was observed from the XRD patterns that with the increase of the treatment time, intensity of XRD peaks increased and full width at half maximum decreased, indicating the enhancement of the crystallinity and crystallite size. Compared with the conventional hydrothermal route, the irradiation under the microwave produces a better crystallinity in a shorter treatment time (30 min), which is a good evidence that the introduction of the microwave really can save energy and time with faster kinetics of crystallization [48–50]. The particle sizes were calculated from (1 1 1) peak using Scherrer’s formula D=kλ/βcosθ, where D  is the average grain size, k a constant equal to 0.89, λ the wavelength of X-rays and β is the corrected half width. The calculated average crystallite sizes of the samples are tabulated in Table 1.Table 1
The calculated average crystallite sizes of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Average crystallite sizes (nm)
M-30 min
8
M-60 min
10
M-90 min
11
M-120 min
12
M-180 min
14
H-24 h
15
P25
25Figure 1
X-ray diffraction patterns of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


## 3.1.2. Surface Area Analysis

The CeO2-SiO2 samples are characterized by specific surface area SBET as shown in Table 2, which indicates that the increase of irradiation time decreases surface area and surface area of sample prepared by microwave method is higher than that prepared by the hydrothermal method. The parameters of surface area and the data calculated from the t-plot are collected in Table 2. The obtained results from the N2-adsorption isotherms for CeO2-SiO2 samples indicate that both are typical of mesoporous solids type IV as shown in Figure 2. However, a decrease in the adsorption capacity of the CeO2-SiO2 samples was observed after increase irradiation time of the microwave. Furthermore, it was noticed that the total pore volume of M-30 min sample had the highest value. The values of SBET and St are generally close in most samples indicating the presence of mesopores.Table 2
Texture parameters of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
S
t (m2/g)
S
micro (cm2/g)
S
ext (cm2/g)
V
p (cm3/g)
V
micro (cm3/g)
V
meso (cm3/g)
r (Å)
M-30 min
335
340
240
95
0.59
0.090
0.500
5.58
M-60 min
300
320
210
90
0.58
0.085
0.495
5.57
M-90 min
236
250
170
66
0.44
0.050
0.390
5.56
M-120 min
118
130
95
23
0.30
0.040
0.260
5.55
M-180 min
100
110
85
15
0.28
0.030
0.250
5.54
H-24 h
90
10
77
13
0.26
0.020
0.240
5.53
P25
50
—
—
—
—
—
—
—N
2 adsorption and desorption isotherm for CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)


## 3.1.3. UV-Vis-DRS Analysis

The optical properties of synthesized CeO2-SiO2 samples were examined by UV-visible spectrophotometer, and the results are displayed in Figure 3. The results reveal an increase in absorbency in the visible light region parallel to the declining irradiation time of the examined systems. Therefore, the study of UV-vis radiation absorption is an important tool for the evaluation of the changes in the produced semiconductor materials by different treatments. Further, the band gap energy was calculated on the basis of the maximum absorption band of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles according to (2). 										(2)Eg=1240λ,
where Eg is the band gap energy, and λ is the lower cutoff wavelength (nm) of the photocatalyst. The values of Eg, the band gap of the CeO2-SiO2 samples, are compiled in Table 3.Table 3
The band gap energy of CeO2-SiO2 samples.
Sample
Band gap energy (eV)
M-30 min
3.25
M-60 min
3.32
M-90 min
3.42
M-120 min
3.55
M-180 min
4.02
H-24 h
4.10Figure 3
UV-vis spectra of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by different irradiation times and hydrothermal method.


## 3.1.4. TEM Observation

With the aid of transmission electron microscope, size and morphology of as-synthesized samples were recorded. Based on the results of photocatalytic activity as given in Section3.2.1, the highest catalytic activity was observed for the sample M-30, and the respective samples M-30 and H-24 were subjected to TEM analysis. The corresponding TEM analysis is shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b). The results show that the shape of the CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by hydrothermal method is spherical shape particles with size of about 15 nm. But the shape of CeO2-SiO2 sample prepared by microwave method for 30 min irradiation time is nanocubes with size of about 8 nm. These findings suggest that the shape and size of nanoparticles depend essentially on the preparation method.TEM images of CeO2-SiO2 samples prepared by (a) 30 min different irradiation times and (b) hydrothermal method.
(a)
(b)


## 3.2. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity

### 3.2.1. Effect of Preparation Method and Irradiation Time on Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye

Within the frame of the present study, the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye was taken as a probe reaction to test the catalytic activity of the system under consideration and Figure5 shows the effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue dye.Figure 5
Effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocalytic efficiency percentage of methylene blue dye.A keen insight into the obtained results, one could observe the following.The highest value of degradation was M-30. The variation in activity should be due to the differences in physical properties such as band gap, particle size, and surface texture. The photocatalytic activities in relation to other obtained physical properties (SBET, band gap, Vp, and crystallite sizes) are compiled in Table 4.Table 4
Effect of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles on the photoactivity.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
Band gap eV
MB removal efficiency, %
V
p (cm3/g)
Crystallite size, nm
M-30 min
335
3.25
93
0.59
8
M-60 min
300
3.32
90
0.58
10
M-90 min
236
3.42
89
0.44
11
M-120 min
118
3.55
88
0.30
12
M-180 min
100
4.02
87
0.28
14
H-24 h
90
4.10
85
0.26
15A maximum photocatalytic activity is found for M-30, where the surface area and pore volume own the maximum values counter to the band gap values. One could explain such increase due to a decrease in energy to exit electron from conduction band to valence band. Also, the M-30 min has the best photoactivity, since it has the lowest band gap and particle size and the highest surface area and pore volume.


### 3.2.2. Factors Affecting on Photocatalytic Activity

Effect of pH
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of pH on MB removal efficiency under the following conditions: 0.3 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 100 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. The findings are summarized in Table5. The results indicate that increasing the pH of MB solution from 3 to 7 leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 93 to 96.0%, but at pH more than 7, the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The possible reason for this behavior is that alkaline pH range favours the formation of more OH radical due to the presence of large quantity of OH− ions in the alkaline medium, which enhances the photocatalytic degradation of MB significantly [51]. The optimum condition for pH is 7 at which photodegradation percentage of MB reach to 96%.Table 5
Effect of pH of MB solution on MB removal efficiency.
pH of MB
MB  removal efficiency, %
3
93.0
4
95.0
7
96.0
9
96.2Effect of MB Concentration
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of the MB concentration on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at pH 7. The results are summarized in Table5. It can be seen that increasing MB concentration from 100 to 200 ppm has no significant effect on MB removal efficiency, but at a concentration higher than 200 ppm, the MB removal efficiency was decreased. The optimum condition for MB concentration is 200 ppm at MB removal efficiency of 96% (see Table 6).Table 6
Effect of MB concentration on MB removal efficiency.
MB concentration, ppm
MB removal efficiency, %
100
96.0
150
96.0
200
96.0
300
90.0
400
95.0Effect of Catalyst/MB Solution Ratio
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at MB concentration of 200 ppm. The findings are shown in Figure6. The results indicate that increasing the catalyst/MB solution ratio from 0.2 to 0.4 g/L leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 96.0 to 99.9%, respectively, but at a catalyst/MB solution ratio more than 0.4 g/L the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The optimum condition of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L is 0.4 at 99.9% MB removal efficiency.Figure 6
Effect of loading of optimum CeO2-SiO2 sample on MB removal efficiency percentage.Comparison between Photocatalytic Activity of CeO2-SiO2 and TiO2 Degussa
Finally, in the present study, a series of experiments has been carried out in order to compare the photocatalytic activity of optimum sample (M-30 min) and commercial reference P25 under the following conditions: 0.4 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 200 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. We found the photocatalytic activity of M-30 min and P25 are 99.9 and 94%, respectively. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles which prepared by 30 min irradiation time was found to have a better performance than the commercial reference P25. Because the surface area of CeO2-SiO2 (335 m2/gm) is higher than that of P25 (50 m2/gm). It is concluded that the synthesized CeO2-SiO2 is one of the best candidate for environmental applications as a photocatalyst.


## 3.2.1. Effect of Preparation Method and Irradiation Time on Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye

Within the frame of the present study, the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye was taken as a probe reaction to test the catalytic activity of the system under consideration and Figure5 shows the effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocatalytic oxidation of methylene blue dye.Figure 5
Effect of irradiation time and preparation method on photocalytic efficiency percentage of methylene blue dye.A keen insight into the obtained results, one could observe the following.The highest value of degradation was M-30. The variation in activity should be due to the differences in physical properties such as band gap, particle size, and surface texture. The photocatalytic activities in relation to other obtained physical properties (SBET, band gap, Vp, and crystallite sizes) are compiled in Table 4.Table 4
Effect of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles on the photoactivity.
Sample
S
BET (m2/g)
Band gap eV
MB removal efficiency, %
V
p (cm3/g)
Crystallite size, nm
M-30 min
335
3.25
93
0.59
8
M-60 min
300
3.32
90
0.58
10
M-90 min
236
3.42
89
0.44
11
M-120 min
118
3.55
88
0.30
12
M-180 min
100
4.02
87
0.28
14
H-24 h
90
4.10
85
0.26
15A maximum photocatalytic activity is found for M-30, where the surface area and pore volume own the maximum values counter to the band gap values. One could explain such increase due to a decrease in energy to exit electron from conduction band to valence band. Also, the M-30 min has the best photoactivity, since it has the lowest band gap and particle size and the highest surface area and pore volume.


## 3.2.2. Factors Affecting on Photocatalytic Activity

Effect of pH
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of pH on MB removal efficiency under the following conditions: 0.3 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 100 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. The findings are summarized in Table5. The results indicate that increasing the pH of MB solution from 3 to 7 leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 93 to 96.0%, but at pH more than 7, the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The possible reason for this behavior is that alkaline pH range favours the formation of more OH radical due to the presence of large quantity of OH− ions in the alkaline medium, which enhances the photocatalytic degradation of MB significantly [51]. The optimum condition for pH is 7 at which photodegradation percentage of MB reach to 96%.Table 5
Effect of pH of MB solution on MB removal efficiency.
pH of MB
MB  removal efficiency, %
3
93.0
4
95.0
7
96.0
9
96.2Effect of MB Concentration
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of the MB concentration on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at pH 7. The results are summarized in Table5. It can be seen that increasing MB concentration from 100 to 200 ppm has no significant effect on MB removal efficiency, but at a concentration higher than 200 ppm, the MB removal efficiency was decreased. The optimum condition for MB concentration is 200 ppm at MB removal efficiency of 96% (see Table 6).Table 6
Effect of MB concentration on MB removal efficiency.
MB concentration, ppm
MB removal efficiency, %
100
96.0
150
96.0
200
96.0
300
90.0
400
95.0Effect of Catalyst/MB Solution Ratio
A series of experiments has been carried out to study the effect of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L on MB removal efficiency under the aforementioned conditions at MB concentration of 200 ppm. The findings are shown in Figure6. The results indicate that increasing the catalyst/MB solution ratio from 0.2 to 0.4 g/L leads to an increase in MB removal efficiency from 96.0 to 99.9%, respectively, but at a catalyst/MB solution ratio more than 0.4 g/L the MB removal efficiency almost remains unchanged. The optimum condition of catalyst/MB solution ratio g/L is 0.4 at 99.9% MB removal efficiency.Figure 6
Effect of loading of optimum CeO2-SiO2 sample on MB removal efficiency percentage.Comparison between Photocatalytic Activity of CeO2-SiO2 and TiO2 Degussa
Finally, in the present study, a series of experiments has been carried out in order to compare the photocatalytic activity of optimum sample (M-30 min) and commercial reference P25 under the following conditions: 0.4 g/L catalyst/MB solution ratio, 200 ppm Conc. of MB, and 1 h reaction time. We found the photocatalytic activity of M-30 min and P25 are 99.9 and 94%, respectively. Therefore, the photocatalytic activity of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles which prepared by 30 min irradiation time was found to have a better performance than the commercial reference P25. Because the surface area of CeO2-SiO2 (335 m2/gm) is higher than that of P25 (50 m2/gm). It is concluded that the synthesized CeO2-SiO2 is one of the best candidate for environmental applications as a photocatalyst.


## 4. Conclusion

The microwave method is a useful for the preparation of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activity, high surface area, and desirable pore structures. The irradiation time showed significant effect on the texture structure, band gap, and particle size. These physical changes affected the efficiency of the photo degradation of methylene blue dye. The activity is well correlated with the band gap, surface area and pore volume. The CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles, which were prepared for 30 min irradiation times exhibited the highest photoactivity due to its high surface area, large pore volume, small particle size, and small band gap. The photocatalytic activity of CeO2-SiO2 nanoparticles, which were prepared for 30 min irradiation time was found to have a better performance than commercial reference P25. It is concluded that the synthesized CeO2-SiO2 is one of the best candidate for environmental applications as a photocatalyst.



---

*Source: 928760-2012-07-02.xml*