# A New Method of Area under the Absorbance-Wavelength Curve for Rats Total Metabolomic Pharmacokinetics from Yangxue Injection with Multicomponents

Authors: Lihong Zhang; Xiaojin Xiao; Zhenzhen Yang; Mengli Jiang; Xiaodong Li
Journal: Journal of Spectroscopy
 (2013)

---

## Abstract

To bridge the convergence between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and modern medicine originated from the West, a new method of area under the absorbance-wavelength curve (AUAWC) by spectrophotometer scanning was investigated and compared with HPLC method to explore metabolomic pharmacokinetics in rats. AUAWC and drug total concentration were obtained after Yangxue was injected to rats. Meanwhile, individual concentrations of sodium ferulate, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in plasma were determined by HPLC. Metabolomic profile of multicomponents plasma concentration time from AUAWC and that of individual components from HPLC were compared. The data from AUAWC had one-compartment model with mean area under concentration versus time (AUC) of 9370.58 min·μg/mL and mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of 12.92 min. The results by HPLC demonstrated that sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride had one-compartment model with AUC of 6075.50 and 876.94 min·μg/mL, t1/2 of 10.85 and 20.57 min, respectively. Tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate showed two-compartment model, and AUC was 29.58 and 201.46 with t1/2β of 1.76 and 16.90, respectively. The profiles indicated that method of AUAWC can be used to study pharmacokinetics of TCM with multicomponents and to improve its development of active theory and application in clinic combined with in vivo metabolomic profile of HPLC.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

For around 200 years, two very different systems of medicine have been used in Asia to cure diseases and keep people healthy. The local Asian one is based on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)—herbal mixtures developed through observation and experience accumulated over thousands of years in China, but with unknown mechanisms of action [1]. On the other hand, modern medicine, which originated from the West, consists of chemically purified compounds that have been discovered through scientific investigation and tested in controlled clinical trials. These two phenomena confirmed the right saying in the career of traditional Chinese medicine that individual drug has its characteristic merits with good effectiveness, but compound formula has excellent clinical application with mixtures reasonable [2]. However, the most classical method, especially high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), of metabolomic pharmacokinetics studies for western chemical drugs is effectively used to determine the drug metabolomic concentration in blood at different kinetic time [3–6]. It can explain the variation of the intensity of the pharmacological effects and explore many in vivo key issues during a pharmacokinetics study, such as absorption and distribution of chemical drugs, bioavailability, biotransformation and excretion pathway. As for TCM, only one or more effective components with known chemical structures in mixtures were selected as targets to investigate the pharmacokinetics by determining the individual metabolomic component concentration in the blood, which is the same as the method of western chemical drugs’ pharmacokinetics studies [7–10]. Even if a single herb of TCM contains dozens or hundreds of kinds of chemical components [11, 12], not to mention the Chinese herbal formula [13, 14], some individual metabolomic components’ in vivo tests cannot represent pharmacokinetics process of TCM with complicated multicomponents and cannot clarify the relationship between a variety of components and integral efficacy [15]. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics study of various individual metabolomic components is difficult to reasonably clarify the pharmacokinetics characteristics of TCM owing to its complexity. Up to now, many related theories and hypotheses about pharmacokinetics of TCM had been studied to explore its metabolomic behavior, but the substantial progresses have not been improved yet [16–21]. It is very important and urgent to establish reasonable analytical methods for metabolomic pharmacokinetics of TCM with multicomponents in order to improve its development of active theory and scientific application in clinic.In this study, the method of area under the absorbance-wavelength curve (AUAWC) was used to determine the total metabolomic contents of Yangxue injection in rats, which is composed of sodium ferulate, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate and has effects on reducing blood viscosity, eliminating blood fat, and improving blood circulation. The previous results verified that the linear relationship between AUAWC and drug total concentration was good by the scanning of ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer [22]. Therefore, the total drug contents of Yangxue injection could be determined through AUAWC of blood samples in rats, and the metabolomic profile could be obtained when the data in vivo were analyzed. Moreover, compared with the metabolomic profile from the HPLC method, the feasibility, rationality, and accuracy of the method of AUAWC used for TCM with multicomponents would be verified according to pharmacokinetics data from Yangxue injection. It will play an important role in the integration of TCM and western medicine in future pharmacokinetics research and clinical application.


## 2. Materials and Methods

### 2.1. Apparatus

Ultraviolet-visible spectrum scan was measured on a TU-1901 spectrophotometer (Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd.) with the use of a 1.0 cm quartz cell. Drug concentrations in plasma were measured on a LC-20AT high performance liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan).


### 2.2. Reagents

Ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, and tanshinol sodium reference substances were obtained from the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products with batch numbers 110773–201012, 110855–200809, and 110817–200305, respectively. Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate reference substance was obtained from the National Institutes For Food and Drug Control with batch number 111605–201202. Yangxue injection was obtained from the Department of Pharmaceutics of Fujian University of TCM. All other reagents were of HPLC grade, and the water used in the experiments was double distilled.


### 2.3. Animals

Healthy Sprague-Dawley rats (male), weighing 180~200 g, were obtained from SLAC Laboratory Animal (Shanghai, China, SCXK (HU) 2007-0005). All the rats were allowed to acclimate one week before treatment. All studies were in compliance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in XBL-China.


### 2.4. Animal Administration and Sampling

60 rats were randomly divided into ten groups based on different interval times. One group was intravenously injected 0.9% sodium chloride injection, and the others were injected Yangxue injection through the vein of rats tail. The rats were fasted overnight and injected a dose of 132.8 mg/kg. Blood samples (about 2.0 mL) from intraocular angular vein of rats were collected and placed into EDTA-2Na anticoagulant tubes at predetermined interval times (5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min). Then, blood samples were centrifuged at 3800 rpm for 10 min, and the separated plasma samples were stored at −20°C for next analysis.


### 2.5. Method of AUAWC by Scanning of Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrophotometer

#### 2.5.1. Preparation of Calibration Standards

The stock solutions of mixture of ferulic acid (1.0 mg/mL), tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (0.3 mg/mL), tanshinol sodium (0.25 mg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (0.11 mg/mL) reference substances were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, with a total concentration of 1.66 mg/mL. Working solutions were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 0.26, 0.52, 1.04, 2.07, 4.15, 8.30, 16.59, and 33.18μg/mL.


#### 2.5.2. Linearity

In accordance with the UV-visible spectrophotometry, methanol was used as a blank control. Full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scan to the above series of mixture standard solutions from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength was carried out. The AUAWC of the total drugs was calculated by Origin software. An eight-point calibration curve was constructed by plotting the AUAWC against the total concentration. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.


#### 2.5.3. Sample Preparation and Test

400μL plasma sample was precisely diluted with methanol to 4 mL, vortexed for 2 minutes, and centrifuged at 3800 r/min for 10 minutes. Then, supernatant was used for a full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scanning from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength with methanol as a blank control.


#### 2.5.4. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the plasma samples at each interval time was calculated. When the average values of AUAWC of drug group subtract those of the control group, respectively, the increased AUAWC caused by total metabolomic drugs was obtained correspondingly and then substituted into the linear equation to get the total metabolomic drug concentration in vivo. The pharmacokinetics models (one- versus two-compartment) were compared according to the AIC rule, with minimum AIC values being regarded as the best representation of the blood concentration-time dynamic data. A compartmental model of Yangxue injection in rats was proposed by the computer program 3p97.


### 2.6. Method of HPLC

#### 2.6.1. Chromatographic Conditions

The HPLC system used was a Shimadzu HPLC, consisting of two LC-10A pumps, a SIL-10AF autoinjector, a SPD-M10A photodiode array detector, and a SCL-10A system controller. A Vision HT C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) column was used. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 0.5% acetic acid (28 : 72 v/v) that was filtered and degassed prior to use, while sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were tested. The mobile phase of tanshinol sodium was consisted of methanol and 0.2% phosphoric acid (15 : 85 v/v), and the methanol and phosphate buffer (60 : 40 v/v) was used to separate sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate. Isocratic elution at 30°C at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Ultraviolet detection of sodium ferulate, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate was carried out at 322, 296, 280, and 271 nm, respectively.


#### 2.6.2. Preparation of Calibration Standards and Quality Control Samples

The standard stock solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (340/237μg/mL), tanshinol sodium (207 μg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (108 μg/mL) were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, respectively. Working solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 136/94.8, 54.4/37.9, 21.8/15.2, 8.70/6.07, 3.48/2.43, 1.39/0.971, 0.557/0.388, 0.223/0.155, and 0.0891/0.0621 μg/mL. Similarly, working solutions of tanshinol sodium were prepared at concentration series of 82.8, 33.1, 13.2, 5.30, 2.12, 0.848, 0.339, and 0.136 μg/mL and solutions of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate at 6.91, 2.76, 1.11, 0.442, 0.177, 0.0708, 0.0283, and 0.0113 μg/mL. Calibration work solutions were prepared by spiking 200 μL of the appropriate working solutions to 100 μL of blank plasma. The quality control (QC) samples including low, middle, and high concentrations of standards were prepared in the same way as the calibration standards. All calibration work solutions and QC samples were stored at −20°C until analysis.


#### 2.6.3. Sample Preparation

200μL of methanol was precisely added into a 100 μL portion of plasma sample. Then, the mixtures were vortexed for 2 minutes and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the aliquot (30 μL) of the supernatant was submitted to the HPLC system.


#### 2.6.4. Method Validation

Specificity. The specificity of the method was investigated by comparing chromatograms of blank rat plasma, each standard of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, the blank plasma spiked with each standard, and plasma samples obtained from rats after administration. There should be no interference from endogenous or exogenous materials observed at the retention time of the four components.Linearity. A nine-point calibration curve with final concentrations of 90.7/63.2, 36.3/25.3, 14.5/10.1, 5.80/4.04, 2.32/1.62, 0.928/0.647, 0.371/0.259, 0.149/0.104, and 0.0594/0.0414 μg/mL was constructed by plotting the peak area against the concentrations of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, respectively. Similarly, the final concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 55.2, 22.1, 8.83, 3.53, 1.41, 0.565, 0.226, and 0.0904 μg/mL, and those of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate were 4.61, 1.84, 0.737, 0.295, 0.118, 0.0472, 0.0189, and 0.00755 μg/mL. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.Recovery. The absolute recovery of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride from rats plasma was calculated at concentrations of 0.371/0.259, 2.32/1.62, and 14.5/10.1 μg/mL by comparing the peak area of extracted samples with ones in which the compounds were spiked directly to methanol. The low, middle, and high concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 0.226, 1.41, and 8.83 μg/mL and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate with 0.118, 0.737, and 4.61 μg/mL. Recoveries at three QC concentration levels for plasma were examined at least five times.Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of the method were determined by analyzing QC samples at three different concentrations the same as recovery experiment. Intraday precision and accuracy were assessed from replicate analyses (n=5) of QC samples at each concentration level on the same day. Precision was determined by calculating the RSD for each replicate, and accuracy was assessed by calculating the percentage bias from the nominal concentration. The precisions were required to be within ±15% relative standard deviation and the accuracy to be within ±15% bias from the nominal values.


#### 2.6.5. Calculations and Statistics

3p97 software was employed to analyze the plasma concentration-time kinetic data. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to the last time point, elimination half-life time (t1/2), volume of distribution (Vd), and plasma clearance (Cl) were all obtained.


## 2.1. Apparatus

Ultraviolet-visible spectrum scan was measured on a TU-1901 spectrophotometer (Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd.) with the use of a 1.0 cm quartz cell. Drug concentrations in plasma were measured on a LC-20AT high performance liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan).


## 2.2. Reagents

Ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, and tanshinol sodium reference substances were obtained from the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products with batch numbers 110773–201012, 110855–200809, and 110817–200305, respectively. Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate reference substance was obtained from the National Institutes For Food and Drug Control with batch number 111605–201202. Yangxue injection was obtained from the Department of Pharmaceutics of Fujian University of TCM. All other reagents were of HPLC grade, and the water used in the experiments was double distilled.


## 2.3. Animals

Healthy Sprague-Dawley rats (male), weighing 180~200 g, were obtained from SLAC Laboratory Animal (Shanghai, China, SCXK (HU) 2007-0005). All the rats were allowed to acclimate one week before treatment. All studies were in compliance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in XBL-China.


## 2.4. Animal Administration and Sampling

60 rats were randomly divided into ten groups based on different interval times. One group was intravenously injected 0.9% sodium chloride injection, and the others were injected Yangxue injection through the vein of rats tail. The rats were fasted overnight and injected a dose of 132.8 mg/kg. Blood samples (about 2.0 mL) from intraocular angular vein of rats were collected and placed into EDTA-2Na anticoagulant tubes at predetermined interval times (5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min). Then, blood samples were centrifuged at 3800 rpm for 10 min, and the separated plasma samples were stored at −20°C for next analysis.


## 2.5. Method of AUAWC by Scanning of Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrophotometer

### 2.5.1. Preparation of Calibration Standards

The stock solutions of mixture of ferulic acid (1.0 mg/mL), tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (0.3 mg/mL), tanshinol sodium (0.25 mg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (0.11 mg/mL) reference substances were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, with a total concentration of 1.66 mg/mL. Working solutions were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 0.26, 0.52, 1.04, 2.07, 4.15, 8.30, 16.59, and 33.18μg/mL.


### 2.5.2. Linearity

In accordance with the UV-visible spectrophotometry, methanol was used as a blank control. Full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scan to the above series of mixture standard solutions from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength was carried out. The AUAWC of the total drugs was calculated by Origin software. An eight-point calibration curve was constructed by plotting the AUAWC against the total concentration. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.


### 2.5.3. Sample Preparation and Test

400μL plasma sample was precisely diluted with methanol to 4 mL, vortexed for 2 minutes, and centrifuged at 3800 r/min for 10 minutes. Then, supernatant was used for a full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scanning from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength with methanol as a blank control.


### 2.5.4. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the plasma samples at each interval time was calculated. When the average values of AUAWC of drug group subtract those of the control group, respectively, the increased AUAWC caused by total metabolomic drugs was obtained correspondingly and then substituted into the linear equation to get the total metabolomic drug concentration in vivo. The pharmacokinetics models (one- versus two-compartment) were compared according to the AIC rule, with minimum AIC values being regarded as the best representation of the blood concentration-time dynamic data. A compartmental model of Yangxue injection in rats was proposed by the computer program 3p97.


## 2.5.1. Preparation of Calibration Standards

The stock solutions of mixture of ferulic acid (1.0 mg/mL), tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (0.3 mg/mL), tanshinol sodium (0.25 mg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (0.11 mg/mL) reference substances were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, with a total concentration of 1.66 mg/mL. Working solutions were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 0.26, 0.52, 1.04, 2.07, 4.15, 8.30, 16.59, and 33.18μg/mL.


## 2.5.2. Linearity

In accordance with the UV-visible spectrophotometry, methanol was used as a blank control. Full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scan to the above series of mixture standard solutions from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength was carried out. The AUAWC of the total drugs was calculated by Origin software. An eight-point calibration curve was constructed by plotting the AUAWC against the total concentration. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.


## 2.5.3. Sample Preparation and Test

400μL plasma sample was precisely diluted with methanol to 4 mL, vortexed for 2 minutes, and centrifuged at 3800 r/min for 10 minutes. Then, supernatant was used for a full ultraviolet-visible spectrum scanning from 200 nm to 600 nm wavelength with methanol as a blank control.


## 2.5.4. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the plasma samples at each interval time was calculated. When the average values of AUAWC of drug group subtract those of the control group, respectively, the increased AUAWC caused by total metabolomic drugs was obtained correspondingly and then substituted into the linear equation to get the total metabolomic drug concentration in vivo. The pharmacokinetics models (one- versus two-compartment) were compared according to the AIC rule, with minimum AIC values being regarded as the best representation of the blood concentration-time dynamic data. A compartmental model of Yangxue injection in rats was proposed by the computer program 3p97.


## 2.6. Method of HPLC

### 2.6.1. Chromatographic Conditions

The HPLC system used was a Shimadzu HPLC, consisting of two LC-10A pumps, a SIL-10AF autoinjector, a SPD-M10A photodiode array detector, and a SCL-10A system controller. A Vision HT C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) column was used. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 0.5% acetic acid (28 : 72 v/v) that was filtered and degassed prior to use, while sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were tested. The mobile phase of tanshinol sodium was consisted of methanol and 0.2% phosphoric acid (15 : 85 v/v), and the methanol and phosphate buffer (60 : 40 v/v) was used to separate sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate. Isocratic elution at 30°C at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Ultraviolet detection of sodium ferulate, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate was carried out at 322, 296, 280, and 271 nm, respectively.


### 2.6.2. Preparation of Calibration Standards and Quality Control Samples

The standard stock solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (340/237μg/mL), tanshinol sodium (207 μg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (108 μg/mL) were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, respectively. Working solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 136/94.8, 54.4/37.9, 21.8/15.2, 8.70/6.07, 3.48/2.43, 1.39/0.971, 0.557/0.388, 0.223/0.155, and 0.0891/0.0621 μg/mL. Similarly, working solutions of tanshinol sodium were prepared at concentration series of 82.8, 33.1, 13.2, 5.30, 2.12, 0.848, 0.339, and 0.136 μg/mL and solutions of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate at 6.91, 2.76, 1.11, 0.442, 0.177, 0.0708, 0.0283, and 0.0113 μg/mL. Calibration work solutions were prepared by spiking 200 μL of the appropriate working solutions to 100 μL of blank plasma. The quality control (QC) samples including low, middle, and high concentrations of standards were prepared in the same way as the calibration standards. All calibration work solutions and QC samples were stored at −20°C until analysis.


### 2.6.3. Sample Preparation

200μL of methanol was precisely added into a 100 μL portion of plasma sample. Then, the mixtures were vortexed for 2 minutes and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the aliquot (30 μL) of the supernatant was submitted to the HPLC system.


### 2.6.4. Method Validation

Specificity. The specificity of the method was investigated by comparing chromatograms of blank rat plasma, each standard of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, the blank plasma spiked with each standard, and plasma samples obtained from rats after administration. There should be no interference from endogenous or exogenous materials observed at the retention time of the four components.Linearity. A nine-point calibration curve with final concentrations of 90.7/63.2, 36.3/25.3, 14.5/10.1, 5.80/4.04, 2.32/1.62, 0.928/0.647, 0.371/0.259, 0.149/0.104, and 0.0594/0.0414 μg/mL was constructed by plotting the peak area against the concentrations of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, respectively. Similarly, the final concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 55.2, 22.1, 8.83, 3.53, 1.41, 0.565, 0.226, and 0.0904 μg/mL, and those of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate were 4.61, 1.84, 0.737, 0.295, 0.118, 0.0472, 0.0189, and 0.00755 μg/mL. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.Recovery. The absolute recovery of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride from rats plasma was calculated at concentrations of 0.371/0.259, 2.32/1.62, and 14.5/10.1 μg/mL by comparing the peak area of extracted samples with ones in which the compounds were spiked directly to methanol. The low, middle, and high concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 0.226, 1.41, and 8.83 μg/mL and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate with 0.118, 0.737, and 4.61 μg/mL. Recoveries at three QC concentration levels for plasma were examined at least five times.Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of the method were determined by analyzing QC samples at three different concentrations the same as recovery experiment. Intraday precision and accuracy were assessed from replicate analyses (n=5) of QC samples at each concentration level on the same day. Precision was determined by calculating the RSD for each replicate, and accuracy was assessed by calculating the percentage bias from the nominal concentration. The precisions were required to be within ±15% relative standard deviation and the accuracy to be within ±15% bias from the nominal values.


### 2.6.5. Calculations and Statistics

3p97 software was employed to analyze the plasma concentration-time kinetic data. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to the last time point, elimination half-life time (t1/2), volume of distribution (Vd), and plasma clearance (Cl) were all obtained.


## 2.6.1. Chromatographic Conditions

The HPLC system used was a Shimadzu HPLC, consisting of two LC-10A pumps, a SIL-10AF autoinjector, a SPD-M10A photodiode array detector, and a SCL-10A system controller. A Vision HT C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) column was used. The mobile phase consisted of methanol and 0.5% acetic acid (28 : 72 v/v) that was filtered and degassed prior to use, while sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were tested. The mobile phase of tanshinol sodium was consisted of methanol and 0.2% phosphoric acid (15 : 85 v/v), and the methanol and phosphate buffer (60 : 40 v/v) was used to separate sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate. Isocratic elution at 30°C at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Ultraviolet detection of sodium ferulate, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate was carried out at 322, 296, 280, and 271 nm, respectively.


## 2.6.2. Preparation of Calibration Standards and Quality Control Samples

The standard stock solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride (340/237μg/mL), tanshinol sodium (207 μg/mL), and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (108 μg/mL) were freshly prepared in methanol and kept at 4°C before use, respectively. Working solutions of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride were prepared by diluting with methanol for further concentration series of 136/94.8, 54.4/37.9, 21.8/15.2, 8.70/6.07, 3.48/2.43, 1.39/0.971, 0.557/0.388, 0.223/0.155, and 0.0891/0.0621 μg/mL. Similarly, working solutions of tanshinol sodium were prepared at concentration series of 82.8, 33.1, 13.2, 5.30, 2.12, 0.848, 0.339, and 0.136 μg/mL and solutions of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate at 6.91, 2.76, 1.11, 0.442, 0.177, 0.0708, 0.0283, and 0.0113 μg/mL. Calibration work solutions were prepared by spiking 200 μL of the appropriate working solutions to 100 μL of blank plasma. The quality control (QC) samples including low, middle, and high concentrations of standards were prepared in the same way as the calibration standards. All calibration work solutions and QC samples were stored at −20°C until analysis.


## 2.6.3. Sample Preparation

200μL of methanol was precisely added into a 100 μL portion of plasma sample. Then, the mixtures were vortexed for 2 minutes and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the aliquot (30 μL) of the supernatant was submitted to the HPLC system.


## 2.6.4. Method Validation

Specificity. The specificity of the method was investigated by comparing chromatograms of blank rat plasma, each standard of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, the blank plasma spiked with each standard, and plasma samples obtained from rats after administration. There should be no interference from endogenous or exogenous materials observed at the retention time of the four components.Linearity. A nine-point calibration curve with final concentrations of 90.7/63.2, 36.3/25.3, 14.5/10.1, 5.80/4.04, 2.32/1.62, 0.928/0.647, 0.371/0.259, 0.149/0.104, and 0.0594/0.0414 μg/mL was constructed by plotting the peak area against the concentrations of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, respectively. Similarly, the final concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 55.2, 22.1, 8.83, 3.53, 1.41, 0.565, 0.226, and 0.0904 μg/mL, and those of sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate were 4.61, 1.84, 0.737, 0.295, 0.118, 0.0472, 0.0189, and 0.00755 μg/mL. The linearity of the calibration curve was evaluated by linear regression analysis.Recovery. The absolute recovery of ferulic acid/tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride from rats plasma was calculated at concentrations of 0.371/0.259, 2.32/1.62, and 14.5/10.1 μg/mL by comparing the peak area of extracted samples with ones in which the compounds were spiked directly to methanol. The low, middle, and high concentrations of tanshinol sodium were 0.226, 1.41, and 8.83 μg/mL and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate with 0.118, 0.737, and 4.61 μg/mL. Recoveries at three QC concentration levels for plasma were examined at least five times.Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of the method were determined by analyzing QC samples at three different concentrations the same as recovery experiment. Intraday precision and accuracy were assessed from replicate analyses (n=5) of QC samples at each concentration level on the same day. Precision was determined by calculating the RSD for each replicate, and accuracy was assessed by calculating the percentage bias from the nominal concentration. The precisions were required to be within ±15% relative standard deviation and the accuracy to be within ±15% bias from the nominal values.


## 2.6.5. Calculations and Statistics

3p97 software was employed to analyze the plasma concentration-time kinetic data. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from zero to the last time point, elimination half-life time (t1/2), volume of distribution (Vd), and plasma clearance (Cl) were all obtained.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. The Results of AUAWC

#### 3.1.1. Linearity

From Figure1, there existed a good linear relationship between AUAWC and total drug concentrations with the same composition and proportion as Yangxue injection. The result showed a good correlation coefficient (r=0.9994) for mixed drugs over the total concentration range from 0.26 to 33.18 μg/mL. The regression equation is AUAWC = 4.8936C + 1.3210 (r=0.9994).Figure 1
Full spectrum scan of mixed standard substance. (Concentration increased successively from bottom to top).


#### 3.1.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Full wavelength scan of different rat plasmas presented in Figure2. Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the control group and drug groups at different interval times was calculated. The mean AUAWC values of plasma samples and the increased AUAWC caused by drugs and potential metabolites were provided in Table 1. When the latter was substituted into the linear equation, the total metabolomic drugs concentrations in vivo were obtained. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curve in rats plasma after Yangxue injection (132.8 mg/kg, i.v.) administration was shown in Figure 3. Main pharmacokinetics parameters of Yangxue injection in rats were presented in Table 2.Table 1
The average values of AUAWC(n=6).
Time (min)
AUAWC of plasma
AUAWC of drugs
0
91.21
5
247.23
156.02
10
223.65
132.44
20
204.83
113.62
30
178.01
86.80
60
121.02
29.81
90
94.03
2.82
120
92.99
1.78
180
81.09
−10.12
240
78.95
−12.26Table 2
Pharmacokinetics mean parameters of 4 components and potential metabolites in rat after Yangxue injection administration.
Parameters
Mean value
C
0/μg·mL−1
502.75
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
12.92
Ke/min−1
0.05
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
9370.58
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.014
V(c)/L
0.26Figure 2
Scanning spectrum of blank plasma (1) and plasma sample obtained at 5 and 30 min with 4 components and potential metabolites after i.v. administration (2 and 3).Figure 3
Profile of total drugs concentration versus time curve in rats plasma with 4 components and potential metabolites after Yangxue injection administration.


### 3.2. The Results of HPLC

#### 3.2.1. Method Validation

Specificity. Black curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of blank plasma after protein precipitation, illustrating the baseline without any disturbing peaks in the chromatograms of plasma samples. No interference or other metabolites were coeluted with target components. Pink curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of plasma samples after Yangxue injection administration at 30 minute, which were marked and had the similar places with those of standards’ chromatograms of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, respectively.Chromatograms of blank plasma (black) and plasma sample at 30 minute (pink). Peaks: 1, sodium ferulate; 2, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride; 3, tanshinol sodium; 4, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Linearity. As shown in Table 3, the results demonstrated good correlation coefficients (r≥0.999) for ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate over the concentration range from separately prepared analytical compounds.Table 3
The correlation coefficients and linear range of linear regression equations.
Compound
Equation
Correlation coefficients
Linear range (μg/mL)
Ferulic acid
Y
=
147126
X
-
41291
0.9999
0.0594~90.7
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
Y
=
73946
X
+
8923.8
0.9999
0.104~63.2
Tanshinol sodium
Y
=
26194
X
-
1882.6
0.9999
0.565~138
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
Y
=
110717
X
+
3682.3
0.9999
7.55 × 10−3~4.61Recovery. The extraction recovery of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma was presented in Table 4.Table 4
The extraction recovery of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration  (μg/mL)
Recovery (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
109.95
8.57
2.32
98.42
1.88
0.371
113.24
3.65
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
123.01
15.34
1.62
106.22
3.79
0.259
104.83
1.68
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
90.28
1.04
1.41
85.22
0.53
0.226
86.53
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
111.40
1.85
0.737
97.62
4.62
0.118
102.24
3.23Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma were presented in Table 5.Table 5
The precision and accuracy of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration (μg/mL)
Precision (RSD, %)
Accuracy
Accuracy (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
1.13
95.05
4.39
2.32
0.53
109.59
1.67
0.371
0.09
105.36
3.58
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
4.95
110.00
4.95
1.62
0.48
100.05
0.48
0.259
0.80
99.60
0.80
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
1.01
95.59
1.01
1.41
0.53
100.12
0.53
0.226
0.55
99.97
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
1.85
105.51
2.34
0.737
4.62
109.95
4.81
0.118
3.23
108.62
3.25


#### 3.2.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Sodium Ferulate, Tetramethylpyrazine Hydrochloride, Tanshinol Sodium, and Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate

The results demonstrated that both sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride appeared to have one-compartment model in rats, but tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate appeared to have two-compartment model. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves and pharmacokinetics parameters of the above four components in rat plasma after administration were showed in Figure5 and Tables 6 and 7. The pharmacokinetics data showed that the individual mean plasma concentration of all four components was rapidly distributed and eliminated in 120 min after intravenous administration to rats.Table 6
Pharmacokinetics parameters of sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride.
Parameters
Sodium ferulate
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
C
0/μg·mL−1
388.25
29.55
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
10.85
20.57
Ke/min−1
0.064
0.034
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
6075.50
876.94
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.013
0.027
V(c)/L
0.206
0.812Table 7
Pharmacokinetics parameters of tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
Parameters
Tanshinol sodium
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
A (μg/mL)
88.29
25.17
B (μg/mL)
6.19
1.49
C
0 (μg/mL)
94.48
26.66
α (1/min)
6.35
0.152
β (1/min)
0.395
0.041
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
29.58
201.46
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.676
0.044
t
1
/
2
,
α (min)
0.109
4.55
t
1
/
2
,
β (min)
1.76
16.90Figure 5
The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves after administration.


## 3.1. The Results of AUAWC

### 3.1.1. Linearity

From Figure1, there existed a good linear relationship between AUAWC and total drug concentrations with the same composition and proportion as Yangxue injection. The result showed a good correlation coefficient (r=0.9994) for mixed drugs over the total concentration range from 0.26 to 33.18 μg/mL. The regression equation is AUAWC = 4.8936C + 1.3210 (r=0.9994).Figure 1
Full spectrum scan of mixed standard substance. (Concentration increased successively from bottom to top).


### 3.1.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Full wavelength scan of different rat plasmas presented in Figure2. Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the control group and drug groups at different interval times was calculated. The mean AUAWC values of plasma samples and the increased AUAWC caused by drugs and potential metabolites were provided in Table 1. When the latter was substituted into the linear equation, the total metabolomic drugs concentrations in vivo were obtained. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curve in rats plasma after Yangxue injection (132.8 mg/kg, i.v.) administration was shown in Figure 3. Main pharmacokinetics parameters of Yangxue injection in rats were presented in Table 2.Table 1
The average values of AUAWC(n=6).
Time (min)
AUAWC of plasma
AUAWC of drugs
0
91.21
5
247.23
156.02
10
223.65
132.44
20
204.83
113.62
30
178.01
86.80
60
121.02
29.81
90
94.03
2.82
120
92.99
1.78
180
81.09
−10.12
240
78.95
−12.26Table 2
Pharmacokinetics mean parameters of 4 components and potential metabolites in rat after Yangxue injection administration.
Parameters
Mean value
C
0/μg·mL−1
502.75
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
12.92
Ke/min−1
0.05
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
9370.58
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.014
V(c)/L
0.26Figure 2
Scanning spectrum of blank plasma (1) and plasma sample obtained at 5 and 30 min with 4 components and potential metabolites after i.v. administration (2 and 3).Figure 3
Profile of total drugs concentration versus time curve in rats plasma with 4 components and potential metabolites after Yangxue injection administration.


## 3.1.1. Linearity

From Figure1, there existed a good linear relationship between AUAWC and total drug concentrations with the same composition and proportion as Yangxue injection. The result showed a good correlation coefficient (r=0.9994) for mixed drugs over the total concentration range from 0.26 to 33.18 μg/mL. The regression equation is AUAWC = 4.8936C + 1.3210 (r=0.9994).Figure 1
Full spectrum scan of mixed standard substance. (Concentration increased successively from bottom to top).


## 3.1.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Yangxue Injection

Full wavelength scan of different rat plasmas presented in Figure2. Absorbance values of full wavelength scan were put into Origin software, and the AUAWC of the control group and drug groups at different interval times was calculated. The mean AUAWC values of plasma samples and the increased AUAWC caused by drugs and potential metabolites were provided in Table 1. When the latter was substituted into the linear equation, the total metabolomic drugs concentrations in vivo were obtained. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curve in rats plasma after Yangxue injection (132.8 mg/kg, i.v.) administration was shown in Figure 3. Main pharmacokinetics parameters of Yangxue injection in rats were presented in Table 2.Table 1
The average values of AUAWC(n=6).
Time (min)
AUAWC of plasma
AUAWC of drugs
0
91.21
5
247.23
156.02
10
223.65
132.44
20
204.83
113.62
30
178.01
86.80
60
121.02
29.81
90
94.03
2.82
120
92.99
1.78
180
81.09
−10.12
240
78.95
−12.26Table 2
Pharmacokinetics mean parameters of 4 components and potential metabolites in rat after Yangxue injection administration.
Parameters
Mean value
C
0/μg·mL−1
502.75
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
12.92
Ke/min−1
0.05
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
9370.58
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.014
V(c)/L
0.26Figure 2
Scanning spectrum of blank plasma (1) and plasma sample obtained at 5 and 30 min with 4 components and potential metabolites after i.v. administration (2 and 3).Figure 3
Profile of total drugs concentration versus time curve in rats plasma with 4 components and potential metabolites after Yangxue injection administration.


## 3.2. The Results of HPLC

### 3.2.1. Method Validation

Specificity. Black curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of blank plasma after protein precipitation, illustrating the baseline without any disturbing peaks in the chromatograms of plasma samples. No interference or other metabolites were coeluted with target components. Pink curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of plasma samples after Yangxue injection administration at 30 minute, which were marked and had the similar places with those of standards’ chromatograms of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, respectively.Chromatograms of blank plasma (black) and plasma sample at 30 minute (pink). Peaks: 1, sodium ferulate; 2, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride; 3, tanshinol sodium; 4, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Linearity. As shown in Table 3, the results demonstrated good correlation coefficients (r≥0.999) for ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate over the concentration range from separately prepared analytical compounds.Table 3
The correlation coefficients and linear range of linear regression equations.
Compound
Equation
Correlation coefficients
Linear range (μg/mL)
Ferulic acid
Y
=
147126
X
-
41291
0.9999
0.0594~90.7
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
Y
=
73946
X
+
8923.8
0.9999
0.104~63.2
Tanshinol sodium
Y
=
26194
X
-
1882.6
0.9999
0.565~138
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
Y
=
110717
X
+
3682.3
0.9999
7.55 × 10−3~4.61Recovery. The extraction recovery of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma was presented in Table 4.Table 4
The extraction recovery of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration  (μg/mL)
Recovery (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
109.95
8.57
2.32
98.42
1.88
0.371
113.24
3.65
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
123.01
15.34
1.62
106.22
3.79
0.259
104.83
1.68
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
90.28
1.04
1.41
85.22
0.53
0.226
86.53
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
111.40
1.85
0.737
97.62
4.62
0.118
102.24
3.23Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma were presented in Table 5.Table 5
The precision and accuracy of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration (μg/mL)
Precision (RSD, %)
Accuracy
Accuracy (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
1.13
95.05
4.39
2.32
0.53
109.59
1.67
0.371
0.09
105.36
3.58
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
4.95
110.00
4.95
1.62
0.48
100.05
0.48
0.259
0.80
99.60
0.80
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
1.01
95.59
1.01
1.41
0.53
100.12
0.53
0.226
0.55
99.97
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
1.85
105.51
2.34
0.737
4.62
109.95
4.81
0.118
3.23
108.62
3.25


### 3.2.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Sodium Ferulate, Tetramethylpyrazine Hydrochloride, Tanshinol Sodium, and Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate

The results demonstrated that both sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride appeared to have one-compartment model in rats, but tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate appeared to have two-compartment model. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves and pharmacokinetics parameters of the above four components in rat plasma after administration were showed in Figure5 and Tables 6 and 7. The pharmacokinetics data showed that the individual mean plasma concentration of all four components was rapidly distributed and eliminated in 120 min after intravenous administration to rats.Table 6
Pharmacokinetics parameters of sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride.
Parameters
Sodium ferulate
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
C
0/μg·mL−1
388.25
29.55
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
10.85
20.57
Ke/min−1
0.064
0.034
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
6075.50
876.94
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.013
0.027
V(c)/L
0.206
0.812Table 7
Pharmacokinetics parameters of tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
Parameters
Tanshinol sodium
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
A (μg/mL)
88.29
25.17
B (μg/mL)
6.19
1.49
C
0 (μg/mL)
94.48
26.66
α (1/min)
6.35
0.152
β (1/min)
0.395
0.041
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
29.58
201.46
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.676
0.044
t
1
/
2
,
α (min)
0.109
4.55
t
1
/
2
,
β (min)
1.76
16.90Figure 5
The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves after administration.


## 3.2.1. Method Validation

Specificity. Black curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of blank plasma after protein precipitation, illustrating the baseline without any disturbing peaks in the chromatograms of plasma samples. No interference or other metabolites were coeluted with target components. Pink curves in Figure 4 showed chromatograms of plasma samples after Yangxue injection administration at 30 minute, which were marked and had the similar places with those of standards’ chromatograms of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, respectively.Chromatograms of blank plasma (black) and plasma sample at 30 minute (pink). Peaks: 1, sodium ferulate; 2, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride; 3, tanshinol sodium; 4, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)Linearity. As shown in Table 3, the results demonstrated good correlation coefficients (r≥0.999) for ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate over the concentration range from separately prepared analytical compounds.Table 3
The correlation coefficients and linear range of linear regression equations.
Compound
Equation
Correlation coefficients
Linear range (μg/mL)
Ferulic acid
Y
=
147126
X
-
41291
0.9999
0.0594~90.7
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
Y
=
73946
X
+
8923.8
0.9999
0.104~63.2
Tanshinol sodium
Y
=
26194
X
-
1882.6
0.9999
0.565~138
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
Y
=
110717
X
+
3682.3
0.9999
7.55 × 10−3~4.61Recovery. The extraction recovery of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma was presented in Table 4.Table 4
The extraction recovery of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration  (μg/mL)
Recovery (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
109.95
8.57
2.32
98.42
1.88
0.371
113.24
3.65
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
123.01
15.34
1.62
106.22
3.79
0.259
104.83
1.68
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
90.28
1.04
1.41
85.22
0.53
0.226
86.53
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
111.40
1.85
0.737
97.62
4.62
0.118
102.24
3.23Precision and Accuracy. The precision and accuracy of ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate in rats plasma were presented in Table 5.Table 5
The precision and accuracy of 4 compounds in rat plasma(n=5).
Compound
Concentration (μg/mL)
Precision (RSD, %)
Accuracy
Accuracy (%)
RSD (%)
Ferulic acid
14.5
1.13
95.05
4.39
2.32
0.53
109.59
1.67
0.371
0.09
105.36
3.58
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
10.1
4.95
110.00
4.95
1.62
0.48
100.05
0.48
0.259
0.80
99.60
0.80
Tanshinol sodium
8.83
1.01
95.59
1.01
1.41
0.53
100.12
0.53
0.226
0.55
99.97
0.55
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
4.61
1.85
105.51
2.34
0.737
4.62
109.95
4.81
0.118
3.23
108.62
3.25


## 3.2.2. Pharmacokinetics Study of Sodium Ferulate, Tetramethylpyrazine Hydrochloride, Tanshinol Sodium, and Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate

The results demonstrated that both sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride appeared to have one-compartment model in rats, but tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate appeared to have two-compartment model. The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves and pharmacokinetics parameters of the above four components in rat plasma after administration were showed in Figure5 and Tables 6 and 7. The pharmacokinetics data showed that the individual mean plasma concentration of all four components was rapidly distributed and eliminated in 120 min after intravenous administration to rats.Table 6
Pharmacokinetics parameters of sodium ferulate and tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride.
Parameters
Sodium ferulate
Tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride
C
0/μg·mL−1
388.25
29.55
t
1
/
2(Ke)/min
10.85
20.57
Ke/min−1
0.064
0.034
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
6075.50
876.94
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.013
0.027
V(c)/L
0.206
0.812Table 7
Pharmacokinetics parameters of tanshinol sodium and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate.
Parameters
Tanshinol sodium
Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate
A (μg/mL)
88.29
25.17
B (μg/mL)
6.19
1.49
C
0 (μg/mL)
94.48
26.66
α (1/min)
6.35
0.152
β (1/min)
0.395
0.041
AUC/μg·mL−1·min
29.58
201.46
CL(s)/L·min−1
0.676
0.044
t
1
/
2
,
α (min)
0.109
4.55
t
1
/
2
,
β (min)
1.76
16.90Figure 5
The profile of concentration versus time kinetic curves after administration.


## 4. Conclusions

There existed a good linear relationship between AUAWC and total concentration of four components composed with the same proportion as Yangxue injection. Both methods of AUAWC and HPLC were feasible and accurate, which will bring a feasible idea and pathway to pharmacokinetics’ studies of TCM with multicomponents. From Tables2, 6, and 7, the value of C0 from AUAWC, 502.75, was similar to the C0 sum of individual ferulic acid, tetramethylpyrazine hydrochloride, tanshinol sodium, and sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate, 538.94. AUC in AUAWC was 9370.58, more about 2187 than that obtained from HPLC, 7183.48, with the sum of individual four components, which was mainly related to new metabolites in rats when compared with the metabolomic profiles from AUAWC and HPLC methods. Also, the value of t1/2 including t1/2 (Ke) in one-compartment model or t1/2,α and t1/2,β in two-compartment model was all not more than 21 minutes, which indicated a quick distribution and fast excretion in rats that were injected Yangxue injection and had a good accordance with [23–26]. It can be concluded that the method of AUAWC can be conveniently used for the in vivo pharmacokinetics study on TCM with multicomponents. If combined with the method of conventional western medicine pharmacokinetics study, such as HPLC or HPLC-MS, to analyze and determine the new certain metabolites, the active theory will be elucidated easily and the clinical application will be performed reasonably for TCM compound with multicomponents. Similarly, the method of AUAWC is useful for the pharmacokinetics study of individual drug or multi-component chemical drugs. It will play an important role in the integration and convergence of TCM and Western medicine.



---

*Source: 919023-2013-09-05.xml*