# Breast Cancer in the Setting of HIV

Authors: Mitul Palan; Sami Shousha; Jonathan krell; Justin Stebbing
Journal: Pathology Research International
 (2011)

---

## Abstract

Oncogenesis in immunocompromised patients occurs due to a number of factors including reduced immune surveillance or other viral pathogens. Breast cancer, unlike other non-AIDS-defining cancers, does not appear associated and has rarely been reported. We describe a case with evidence of immune reactivity around the tumor, but not in the tumor itself.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Very few cases of breast cancer in HIV-infected women are recorded in the literature; approximately 46 HIV-infected women to this date have been recorded. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 33.4 million people (adults and children) in the world were living with HIV in 2008, the majority of which resided in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. A very wide range of cancers have been associated with an increased incidence in people living with HIV [2, 3]. As well as neoplasms such as Kaposi’s sarcoma [4] and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [5], a focus of recent research has been the non-AIDS-defining cancers, that is, tumors other than Kaposi sarcoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and cancer of the uterine cervix, in the setting of HIV. However, of the non-AIDS-defined cancers, breast cancer does not seem to increase in incidence within the HIV-infected population. This relationship between the two diseases has been noted worldwide, but few explanations have been forwarded as to the exact causative/noncausative relationship that the two may partake in.This paper looks to evaluate the relationship between the HIV and breast cancer, and we propose some theories as to why HIV infection may actually protect against breast tumor development.


## 2. Case Vignette

A 44-year-old HIV-positive lady presented with a right breast mass in the upper outer quadrant and was diagnosed with a triple negative (i.e., oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) negative), grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 15 mm × 15 mm in size, with zero out of 3 sentinel nodes involved.She initially noticed a lump in her right breast, alongside skin and shape changes in the breast and nipple discharge. There was no history of oral contraceptive use, nor any family history of breast/ovarian cancer. Her CD4 count measured 450 cells/mm3 with an HIV-1 viral load of approximately 500 copies/mL. Mammography, ultrasound, and core biopsy of the right breast confirmed the presence of the tumor. Figures of her breast pathology may be seen below (Figures 1 and 2). CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte staining of the tissue sample showed significant lymphocytic infiltration adjacent to the tumor (but not within it).Low (a) and high (b) power images of our patient’s invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin. (a) shows a large area of central tumor necrosis with a peripheral rim of viable tumor cells. (b) shows invasive tumor cells with high nuclear grade.
(a)(b)CD4 (a) and CD8 (b) staining of the tumor sections. Both cell populations were found adjacent to, but not infiltrating, the tumor.
(a)(b)The patient’s treatment included a wide local excision of the lump with right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy. The patient underwent 6 cycles of FEC75 chemotherapy requiring substantial dose reductions and G-CSF support, while remaining concurrently on HAART. A bone scan and a CT showed no sign of distant metastases. At the time of submission, she is completing her chemotherapy.


## 3. Discussion

While a number of neoplasms are well associated with HIV infection [4–7], non-AIDS-defining tumors [8] have more complex affiliations to HIV—some seem to also increase in incidence with infection, for example, lung cancer, myeloma, anal cancers [7, 9], while it is still debated whether others (e.g., breast cancer, head and neck cancer [10]) have an increased incidence due to HIV.Few studies have delved into explaining the link between HIV and breast cancer. This is not particularly surprising however, as only 48 cases of breast cancer have been noted in HIV-positive people to date [11]. This number may be contested due to lack of case presentation (e.g., poorer socioeconomic groups/people of the third world less likely to seek medical care) or that women with HIV may have a reduced lifespan (and therefore are less likely to reach an age at which breast cancer may occur) [12]. A study in 1,416 HIV-positive Thai women, with an average age of 40.8 years over 5 years, found breast cancer to be the most prominent (9.5%) non-AIDS-defining tumors (42 cases of non-AIDS tumors overall) occurring [13]. It is important however to note though that the number of patients with breast cancer amounted to 4: approximately 0.28% of the percentage of women, a figure not too dissimilar to what one would expect in a female cohort such as this.The majority of studies have found no difference in the incidence of breast cancer in HIV-positive women and the HIV-negative population [11]. An American study by Frisch et al. found the relative risk of developing breast cancer after HIV infection was 1.1, that is, HIV infection had little impact on breast cancer incidence [7], and other studies have supported this [9, 14]. In a sub-Saharan Tanzanian population, there was a small, yet statistically significant decrease in breast cancer incidence in the post-AIDS epidemic period (1983–1996), compared to the pre-AIDS period (1968–1983) [4]. Data from Rwanda additionally shows a low number of breast cancer cases despite a high HIV prevalence [15]. Reviews concur with these findings. For example, in South Africa, no trend has been observed [16].People with HIV may develop cancer due to impaired immune surveillance, dysregulation of growth factors or cytokines, or imbalance between proliferation and differentiation [17]. As can be observed in our case, and in a number of other reported cases [18], the pathology of HIV-positive breast cancer patients is in stark contrast to noninfected women in the population. A reduction in immune function could be a reason why breast cancer prevalence remains low in patients with HIV [7, 19]. Pantanowitz investigated the pathology of HIV-positive breast cancer cases, finding that the immune response to these neoplasms was considerably less compared to that found in breast cancer in nonaffected women [3]. Immunosuppression is a large factor in the pathogenesis of many AIDS-related cancers [18, 20, 21]. HPV, associated with anal and cervical cancer (particularly in the immunocompromised), may induce oncogenesis by altering cell-cycle control—either deactivating tumor-suppressor genes or up regulating certain oncogenes [22]. There is continued debate whether HIV itself may cause dysregulation of cell proliferation by insertion of provirus nuclear material near/within human oncogenes [20].The prognostic significance of stromal lymphocytic infiltration in breast cancer is disputed [23–26]. Previously, it has been linked to a poor prognosis [3, 27] (e.g., CD4- and CD8-T lymphocyte infiltration has been associated with high grade intraductal carcinomas [18]). This is not a relationship one would expect between the two as the immune system in nonimmunocompromised individuals plays a pivotal role in removing cancerous cells [18]. However, the control over cell proliferation here is slightly more complex. CD4- and CD8-T lymphocytes are implicated in acquired immune responses to cancer, but are tightly regulated by T regulatory cells [28]. Various studies have shown that T regulatory cells are found in abundance in neoplastic breast tissues, both in situ and in invasive carcinomas—their recruitment in intratumoral and peritumoral tissue may enable malignant cells to evade the host immune response, and as such may represent a marker of breast cancer progression [28, 29]. This may explain the absence of intratumoral lymphocytic infiltration, as seen in our patient (Figures 1 and 2). In HIV, however, the reduction in T cell count suggests that with a decreased number of T regulatory cells (along with some CD4- and CD8-T lymphocytes), the host is unable to restrict an immune response to cancer growth. This may indirectly benefit the patient from developing breast cancer, but perhaps not from other cancers [8]. Studies in posttransplant, non-HIV immunocompromised women (a similar subgroup to HIV-positive women) also support this proposition [16, 30].HAART-induced restoration of immune function with treatment [31] may prevent initial breast tumorigenesis. Antiretrovirals such as ritonavir have been implicated in targeting both viral and tumorigenic proteins [32] that may play some part in breast cancer proliferation or tumor progression/resistance [33, 34]. These drugs may decrease the availability/activity of proangiogenic factors [5, 35], interfere with other oncogenic cytokine signalling pathways [31], or target intracellular mitogenic signalling pathways (which tumors use to proliferate [36, 37]). There is also some evidence to suggest that HIV viral proteins may induce tumor cell cytotoxicity and apoptosis [38]. Excessive fatty tissue contributes to breast cancer in postmenopausal women (as peripheral conversion of androgens to active oestradiol stimulates breast epithelial proliferation). The nutrient redistribution in HIV patients may have a role here [39–41], and the reduction in peripheral fat stores could reduce peripheral oestradiol conversion in these women. Overall, this seems an unlikely occurrence, especially in the few cases on breast cancer in HIV patients found.



---

*Source: 925712-2011-05-25.xml*