# Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns ofCandida Species Recovered from Endotracheal Tube in an Intensive Care Unit

Authors: Elham Baghdadi; Sadegh Khodavaisy; Sassan Rezaie; Sara Abolghasem; Neda Kiasat; Zahra Salehi; Somayeh Sharifynia; Farzad Aala
Journal: Advances in Medicine
 (2016)

---

## Abstract

Aims. Biofilms formed byCandida species which associated with drastically enhanced resistance against most antimicrobial agents. The aim of this study was to identify and determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern ofCandida species isolated from endotracheal tubes from ICU patients.Methods. One hundred forty ICU patients with tracheal tubes who were intubated and mechanically ventilated were surveyed for endotracheal tube biofilms. Samples were processed for quantitative microbial culture. Yeast isolates were identified to the species level based on morphological characteristics and their identity was confirmed by PCR-RFLP. Antifungal susceptibility testing was determined according to CLSI document (M27-A3).Results. Ninety-five strains ofCandida were obtained from endotracheal tubes of whichC. albicans (n
=
34; 35.7%) was the most frequently isolated species followed by other species which includedC. glabrata (n
=
24; 25.2%),C. parapsilosis (n
=
16; 16.8%),C. tropicalis (n
=
12; 12.6%), andC. krusei (n
=
9; 9.4%). The resulting MIC90 for allCandida species were in increasing order as follows: caspofungin (0.5 μg/mL); amphotericin B (2 μg/mL); voriconazole (8.8 μg/mL); itraconazole (16 μg/mL); and fluconazole (64 μg/mL).Conclusion.Candida species recovered from endotracheal tube are the most susceptible to caspofungin.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nosocomial infections are an important cause of mortality and increasing hospital costs [1]. The infection is usually transmitted to susceptible patients through infected medical staff and equipment by pathogenic organisms [2]. Biofilms are microbial communities embedded in biopolymer matrix on living or nonliving substrates [3]. According to the National Institutes of Health America, approximately 80% of hospital infections are associated with microbial biofilms [4]. Important microorganisms involved in microbial biofilm formation predominantly consist of many species of both fungal and bacterial. Among pathogenic fungi,Candida species are the most common cause of superficial and systemic disease [5].Candida species can aggregate on medical devices such as venous and urinary catheters, dentures, and ocular implants by biofilms [3, 6, 7].Candida biofilms can identify in individuals with certain circumstances, such as immunocompromised patients, HIV infected, cancerous, and organ transplant recipients. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is the most frequent intensive care unit (ICU) acquired infection among patients ventilated through tracheostomy or endotracheal intubation [8]. This topic can provide the conditions such as prolonged hospitalization and use of a variety of devices for colonization and creating biofilms byCandida species. Biofilms formed by these fungal organisms are associated with drastically enhanced resistance against most antifungal therapy [8, 9]. Several studies show that antifungal agents, that is, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole, displayed less activity againstCandida albicans biofilms formed on the PVC disk [10–12]. In addition, non-C. albicans have shown resistance to two new antifungal drugs (voriconazole and ravuconazole), but it seems that antibiofilm activity of amphotericin B lipid formulation and also echinocandins have existed [13]. Therefore the aim of the present study was to evaluate antifungal susceptibility testing ofCandida spp. isolated from endotracheal tubes in ICU patients.


## 2. Materials and Methods

This study was carried out in the Intensive Care Unit of the Imam Khomeini and Golestan Hospitals, Ahvaz, during January–September 2015. One hundred forty ICU patients with tracheal tubes who were intubated and mechanically ventilated were surveyed for endotracheal tube biofilms. The length of hospitalization was at least two weeks prior to sampling. Collected endotracheal tubes of patients who had clinical manifestation of pneumonia including cough, purulent respiratory secretion, fever, and new or progressive infiltration of lung in CXR were placed in sealed sterile bottles and referred immediately to the laboratory for processing. From the central region of each endotracheal tube 1 cm section was cut and processed for quantitative microbial culture.


### 2.1. Morphological and Molecular Identification

The specimens were inoculated onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Difco) supplemented with chloramphenicol and incubated at 37°C for two days. Primarily, yeast colonies were identified by conventional tools such as colony color on CHROMagarCandida medium (CHROMagar Company, Paris, France), germ tube tests in serum at 37°C for 2-3 h, and microscopic morphology on cornmeal agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich., USA) with 1% Tween 80. Confirmation molecular approaches were adjusted. Genomic DNA was extracted, using the method of glass bead disruption, and the PCR-RFLP method was performed as described previously [14].


### 2.2. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations) of identifiedCandida isolates were determined according to recommendations stated in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 document [15]. Amphotericin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), fluconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA), itraconazole (Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium), voriconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA), and caspofungin (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) were obtained as reagent-grade powders from the respective manufacturers for preparation of the CLSI microdilution trays. Inoculum was prepared by gently scraping the surface of the fungal colonies with a sterile cotton swab moistened with sterile physiological saline. Conidial suspensions were adjusted to transmission of 75% to 77% at 530 nm (approximate 1 × 106–5 × 106 CFU/mL). The inoculum suspensions, including mostly nongerminated conidia, were diluted 1 : 1000 in RPMI 1640 medium and the final inoculum in assay wells was between 0.5 × 103 and 5 × 103 CFU/mL. The microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C for 24–48 h. MICs were determined visually by comparison of the growth in the wells containing the drug with the drug-free control.Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) andCandida krusei (ATCC 6258) reference strains were for quality control.


## 2.1. Morphological and Molecular Identification

The specimens were inoculated onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Difco) supplemented with chloramphenicol and incubated at 37°C for two days. Primarily, yeast colonies were identified by conventional tools such as colony color on CHROMagarCandida medium (CHROMagar Company, Paris, France), germ tube tests in serum at 37°C for 2-3 h, and microscopic morphology on cornmeal agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich., USA) with 1% Tween 80. Confirmation molecular approaches were adjusted. Genomic DNA was extracted, using the method of glass bead disruption, and the PCR-RFLP method was performed as described previously [14].


## 2.2. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

MICs (minimum inhibitory concentrations) of identifiedCandida isolates were determined according to recommendations stated in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 document [15]. Amphotericin B (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), fluconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA), itraconazole (Janssen Research Foundation, Beerse, Belgium), voriconazole (Pfizer, Groton, CT, USA), and caspofungin (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA) were obtained as reagent-grade powders from the respective manufacturers for preparation of the CLSI microdilution trays. Inoculum was prepared by gently scraping the surface of the fungal colonies with a sterile cotton swab moistened with sterile physiological saline. Conidial suspensions were adjusted to transmission of 75% to 77% at 530 nm (approximate 1 × 106–5 × 106 CFU/mL). The inoculum suspensions, including mostly nongerminated conidia, were diluted 1 : 1000 in RPMI 1640 medium and the final inoculum in assay wells was between 0.5 × 103 and 5 × 103 CFU/mL. The microdilution trays were incubated at 35°C for 24–48 h. MICs were determined visually by comparison of the growth in the wells containing the drug with the drug-free control.Candida parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) andCandida krusei (ATCC 6258) reference strains were for quality control.


## 3. Results

Out of one hundred forty ICU patients hospitalized, ninety-five strains ofCandida which were obtained from endotracheal tubes were studied. The positive specimens belonged to 67 male and 28 female hospitalized patients. The duration of being intubated had a median of 9 days and hospital stay duration average was 29
±
3.6 days. The isolates were confirmed based on species level using PCR-RFLP of whichC. albicans (n
=
34; 35.7%) was the most frequently isolated species, followed byC. glabrata (n
=
24; 25.2%),C. parapsilosis (n
=
16; 16.8%),C. tropicalis (n
=
12; 12.6%), andC. krusei (n
=
9; 9.4%). Table 1 summarizes the results ofin vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles (MIC range, geometric mean MIC, MIC50, and MIC90) of several antifungal drugs against allCandida species. The resulting MIC50 for allCandida species were in increasing order as follows: caspofungin (0.5 μg/mL); amphotericin B (1 μg/mL); voriconazole (0.25 μg/mL); itraconazole (0.75 μg/mL); and fluconazole (4 μg/mL). Results showed the widest range and the highest MICs for fluconazole (0.016–≥64 μg/mL), voriconazole (0.016–≥16 μg/mL), and itraconazole (0.016–≥16 μg/mL). Results revealed statistically significant differences when comparing the susceptibility ofC. albicans and non-albicans Candida to fluconazole, voriconazole, and itraconazole (P
<
0.05) withC. albicans being found to be the most susceptible to these antifungal agents. MIC results among all the isolates ofCandida species showed that they were fully susceptible to caspofungin (Table 2).Table 1
In vitrosusceptibilities of Candida spp. recovered from endotracheal tube to antifungal agents. MIC range, geometric mean, MIC50, and MIC90 values are expressed in μg/mL.
Species (n)
Antifungal agents
Ranges
MIC50
MIC90
GM
TotalCandidaspp.(95)
Amphotericin B
0.062–4
1
2
0.420
Itraconazole
0.016–≥16
0.75
4
0.847
Voriconazole
0.016–≥16
0.25
4
0.381
Fluconazole
0.016–≥64
4
64
2.881
Caspofungin
0.008–2
0.5
0.5
0.294
C. albicans (34)
Amphotericin B
0.062–2
0.5
2
0.178
Itraconazole
0.016–≥16
0.062
16
0.242
Voriconazole
0.016–≥16
0.031
8
0.119
Fluconazole
0.016–≥64
0.5
8
0.999
Caspofungin
0.008–0.5
0.5
0.5
0.182
C. glabrata (24)
Amphotericin B
0.062–2
1
2
0.706
Itraconazole
0.016–16
8
16
3.121
Voriconazole
0.016–16
0.5
16
0.684
Fluconazole
0.25–16
16
64
5.941
Caspofungin
0.125–1
0.5
0.75
0.390
C. parapsilosis (16)
Amphotericin B
0.016–1
0.25
0.5
0.158
Itraconazole
0.016–0.5
0.5
0.5
0.249
Voriconazole
0.016–0.5
0.125
0.25
0.157
Fluconazole
0.125–4
2
2
1
Caspofungin
0.125–0.5
0.5
0.5
0.314
C. tropicalis (12)
Amphotericin B
1–4
2
4
2
Itraconazole
1–≥64
16
16
7.245
Voriconazole
0.125–4
2
2
1
Fluconazole
4–≥64
16
—
19.02
Caspofungin
0.008–2
0.5
0.5
0.458
C. krusei (9)
Amphotericin B
0.062–2
2
—
0.447
Itraconazole
0.031–8
0.37
—
0.398
Voriconazole
0.125–16
0.25
—
0.870
Fluconazole
0.016–4
32
—
2.512
Caspofungin
0.008–2
0.375
—
0.353
GM: geometric mean.Table 2
MIC interpretation of five antifungal drugs againstCandida spp. recovered from endotracheal tube.
Antifungal agents
C. albicans
n
=
34 (%)
C. glabrata
n
=
24 (%)
C. parapsilosis
n
=
16 (%)
C. tropicalis
n
=
12 (%)
C. krusei
n
=
9 (%)
Amphotericin B
S
28 (82.3)
20 (83.3)
16 (100)
10 (83.3)
7 (77.7)
R
6 (17.6)
4 (16.6)
—
2 (16.7)
2 (22.2)
Itraconazole
S
20 (58.8)
12 (50)
6 (37.5)
4 (33.3)
3 (33.3)
DD
2 (5.8)
6 (25)
10 (62.5)
—
5 (55.5)
R
12 (35.2)
6 (25)
—
8 (66.6)
1 (11.1)
Voriconazole
S
27 (79.4)
11 (45.8)
12 (75)
4 (33.3)
6 (66.6)
DD
2 (5.8)
5 (20.8)
4 (25)
3 (25)
2 (22.2)
R
5 (14.7)
8 (33.3)
—
5 (41.6)
1 (11.1)
Fluconazole
S
22 (64.7)
3 (12.5)
14 (87.5)
3 (25)
5 (55.5)
DD
3 (8.8)
2 (8.3)
2 (12.5)
4 (33.3)
2 (22.2)
R
9 (26.4)
19 (79.1)
—
5 (41.6)
2 (22.2)
Caspofungin
S
34 (100)
24 (100)
16 (100)
12 (100)
9 (100)
R
—
—
—
—
—
S: susceptible; R: resistance; DD: dose-dependent.


## 4. Discussion

Candida is opportunistic pathogen which causes a life-threatening infection with high rates of mortality especially in immunocompromised individuals [16]. The pathogenicity ofCandida species is attributed to certain virulence factors, mostly production of biofilm [17, 18].Candida species are now recognized as major agents of hospital-acquired infection. Almost invariably, an implanted device such as an urinary catheter or endotracheal tube is associated with these infections [18].Candida species can cause significant problems of medical settings as persistent and recurrent device related infections [19, 20]. This properties also differed among different species ofCandida [17, 21]. In this studyC. albicans (35.7%) was the most common species obtained from endotracheal tube, compatible with other studies that mentioned thatC. albicans is considered as major etiologic agent in candidiasis [16, 17, 20]. Other studies reported that the ability of biofilm production inC. parapsilosis andC. glabrata was significantly less thanC. albicans [17, 21]. Biofilm phenotype in non-C. albicans species is the cause of the survival and well adapted to colonization of tissues and indwelling devices [20]. This difference in our results probably is due to variety of biofilms formation amongCandida species from different sources. Mahmoudabadi et al. showed a higher percentageC. albicans (41.7%) which have recovered from blood samples in comparison with other sources [21]. In our investigation, other species ofCandida includedC. glabrata (25.2%),C. parapsilosis (16.8%),C. tropicalis (12.6%), andC. krusei (9.4%) obtained from endotracheal tubes. These data are in agreement with the findings of a previous study [22–25]. Also Shokohi et al., Richter et al., and Papon et al. mentionedC. glabrata as the most common non-C. albicans species in their investigation [24–27]. Deorukhkar et al.’s study indicatedC. tropicalis (29.4%) as the major non-C. albicans species isolate followed byC. glabrata (20.7%) that is incompatible with these studies [28, 29]. The obtained antifungal susceptibility patterns indicated thatC. albicans isolates were highly susceptible to caspofungin (100%) (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL). These findings are in agreements with other studies that reported [30, 31]. In this investigation 26.4% ofC. albicans strains were resistant to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 64 μg/mL), whereas other studies reported the rates of this resistance as 45.83%, 11.9%, 74.2%, 2.7%, and 38.7%, respectively [27, 32–35]. Studies by Shokohi et al., Al-Mamari et al., Aher et al., Awari, and Roy et al. indicated the resistance ofC. albicans to itraconazole as 5.4%, 10.3%, 36.9%, 35%, and 19.3%, respectively [26, 32, 36, 37]. However, in our finding 35.2% ofC. albicans strains were shown to be resistant to itraconazole MIC ≥ 1 μg/mL. In our study 14.7% ofC. albicans isolates were resistant to voriconazole (MIC ≥ 1 μg/mL) that was different from results of Zang et al. and Badiee and Alborzi’s studies [23, 38]. MIC range (0.016–≥16 μg/mL) and MIC90 (8 μg/mL) for voriconazole in present study were different from results by Zhang et al. and Badiee and Alborzi which reported MIC range and MIC90 as 0.0313–4 μg/mL and 0.25 μg/mL and 0.003–16 μg/mL and 4 μg/mL, respectively [23, 38]. In addition, 17.6% ofC. albicans isolates in our study were indicated to be resistant to amphotericin B MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL. The result was to some extent similar to the result reported by of Aher et al. (13.8%) and differs from results by Njunda et al. (54.4%), Awari et al. (7.5%), and Zhang et al. (1.1%) [26, 33, 35, 37–39]. MIC range (0.062–2 μg/mL) and MIC90 (2 μg/mL) for amphotericin B in present study differ from the data reported by Bosco-Borgeat et al. which reported MIC Range and MIC90 as 0.13–1 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively [39]. Our data indicated that 79.1% ofC. glabratawere resistance to itraconazole. These data are in disagreement with the rate of itraconazole resistanceC. glabratain studies by Shokohi et al. (12.5%), Haddadi et al. (21%), and Deorukhkar et al. (46.2%) [27, 29, 40]. Also Aher reported 46.4% and 40% resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively; these mentioned rates differ from the results of our investigation [26]. Our study has shown that fluconazole MIC90 values (8, 64, and 2 μg/mL), itraconazole (16, 16, and 0.5 μg/mL), and voriconazole (8, 16, and 0.25) againstC. albicans, C. glabrata, andC. parapsilosis, respectively, according to study by Badiee and Alborzi in regard to fluconazole rates are lower (16, 128, and 4) and itraconazole and voriconazole have higher amount (2, 16, and 0.25 and 4, 3, and 0.033), respectively [23]. In fact, MIC90 inC. glabrata as the main non-Candida albicans to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole was higher thanC. albicans andC. parapsilosis. MIC90 fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole forC. glabratain our investigation were 64, 16, and 16. Long term fluconazole and itraconazole prophylaxis were accompanied with reduction in sensitivity to these agents and recentlyC. glabrata known as naturally less susceptible to azoles compared to otherCandida species [35, 41, 42]. Our study has shown that amphotericin B and caspofungin MIC90 values were 2, 2, and 0.5 μg/mL and 0.5, 0.75, and 0.5 μg/mL againstC. albicans, C. glabrata, andC. parapsilosis, respectively. However in other studies MIC90 values of amphotericin B were lower (0.25, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/mL) [23]. In present study 87.5%, 37.5%, and 75% ofC. parapsilosis strains were susceptible to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole, respectively. This result is similar to that by Shokohi et al. who found no resistance species among them. Badiee et al. obtained 6.9% and 3.5% resistance to fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. In addition they find no voriconazole resistanceC. parapsilosis among them. In addition Zhang et al.’s findings show 15.4% resistance to fluconazole; however there was no resistance to itraconazol and voriconazole [23, 27, 38]. In our study we find that 41.6%, 66.6%, and 41.6% ofC. tropicaliswere resistant to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole, respectively. In contrast, Shokohi et al. did not find resistance species in their study. Also Zhang et al. and Aher et al. obtained 10.7% and 4.8% and 52% and 56% of isolates which were resistant to fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively [26, 27, 38]. HoweverC. tropicalis isolates were highly susceptible to caspofungin and amphotericin B (100%, 83.3%). Therefore these antifungals seem to be the most active drug for candidiasis treatment. In our study MIC90 of fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole forC. parapsilosis were 2, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/mL whereas Zhang et al., Tay et al., and Bonfietti et al. obtained 2, 0.062, and 0.25 μg/mL, 4, 0.19, and 0.047 μg/mL, 2, 0.06, and 0.03 μg/mL, respectively, as MIC90 to mention antifungal drugs [38, 43, 44]. Our results indicated thatC. parapsilosis isolates from endotracheal tube were highly susceptible to caspofungin and amphotericin B; this data also shows that the concentration of 0.5 μg/mL of this medicine is able to inhibit 90% of mentioned isolates.


## 5. Conclusion

Knowledge ofCandida species distribution and antifungal resistance pattern of them plays an important role in appropriate therapy. Our results suggest thatCandida species recovered from endotracheal tube are the most susceptible to caspofungin, followed by amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole, and fluconazole.



---

*Source: 9242031-2016-08-23.xml*