# Studies on Characterization, Optical Absorption, and Photoluminescence of Yttrium Doped ZnS Nanoparticles

Authors: Ranganaik Viswanath; Halehatty Seethya Bhojya Naik; Yashavanth Kumar Gubbihally Somalanaik; Prashanth Kumar Parlesed Neelanjeneallu; Khandugadahalli Nagarajappa Harish; Mustur Channabasappa Prabhakara
Journal: Journal of Nanotechnology
 (2014)

---

## Abstract

Pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles were synthesized by a chemical coprecipitation route using EDTA-ethylenediamine as a stabilizing agent. X-ray diffraction (XRD), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR), thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC), and UV-visible and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy were employed to characterize the as-synthesized ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles, respectively. XRD and TEM studies show the formation of cubic ZnS:Y particles with an average size of ~4.5 nm. The doping did not alter the phase of the zinc sulphide, as a result the sample showed cubic zincblende structure. The UV-visible spectra of ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles showed a band gap energy value, 3.85 eV and 3.73 eV, which corresponds to a semiconductor material. A luminescence characteristics such as strong and stable visible-light emissions in the orange region alone with the blue emission peaks were observed for doped ZnS nanoparticles at room temperature. The PL intensity of orange emission peak was found to be increased with an increase in yttrium ions concentration by suppressing blue emission peaks. These results strongly propose that yttrium doped zinc sulphide nanoparticles form a new class of luminescent material.


---

## Body

## 1. Introduction

Nanomaterials and nanostructures play the important role in applications of nanoscience and nanotechnology in the fields of energy sources, environments, and health. Nanomaterials are increasingly gaining the attention of not only the scientific community but also the public due to their unique properties, which lead to new and exciting applications [1, 2]. For the last few years the investigation has been focused on the preparation and characterization of II–VI semiconductor nanoparticles for applications in biological field as molecular probes or biolabels [3] and also have attracted much attention in photo- and electroluminescence properties because of their size-dependent (which is tunable) and have promising optoelectronic applications [4]. Among these families, a nontoxic semiconductor zinc sulfide (ZnS) is one of the most important and typical crystalline phosphors for both applications and basic research. In particular, doped-ZnS phosphors have been investigated extensively, because ZnS a good host material is an important versatile and luminescent material with a wide band gap (3.6 eV) [5]. The optical properties of various ZnS doped nanocrystals and the potential applications of these luminescent materials have been reported by different groups [6]. ZnS nanoparticles in their doped and codoped form with transition and innertransition metals have received much attention as a class of particularly luminescent materials. Different metal ions such as Cu, Mn, Pb, Co, Cd, Eu, and Sm doped with ZnS have been studied by many researchers because of their extensive photoluminescence (PL) properties [7]. Generally ZnS doped with these metal ions provide new opportunities as full-color luminescence in the UV-visible region [8–12]. Recent studies on Y ions incorporated into wide band gap semiconductor like ZnO [13, 14] which resulted in significant increase in the optical properties, photocatalyst efficiency with improved stability of ZnO nanoparticles. Yttrium doping has also resulted in the deep-level emission with strong enhancement in the UV emission intensity, which prompts the application of ZnO nanoparticles in full-color displays and photoelectric nanodevices [15]. Yttrium doping also tunes the emission wavelength of ZnO and makes a supersensitive UV detector [16]. In particular the available experimental data on Y:ZnS system to date is not known to the best of our knowledge. The potential applications and importance of Y doped II–VI semiconductors in optoelectronic and spintronic devices have motivated the present authors to undertake yttrium doped ZnS system for this study. A variety of methods have been proposed to obtained undoped and doped nanometer-sized zinc sulfide nanoparticles, including gas-phase, solid/vapor, and aqueous solution reactions [4], and also different methods have been reported for the synthesis of zinc sulfide as a host for transition and rare earth metal ions [17]. Therefore, it is important to find a simple preparation method or process due to the complexity, expensiveness, and the use of a toxic gas, which can produce size controlled nanoparticles at lower cost with less or no impurities. So, here we describe the chemical coprecipitation method as it does not demand any costly apparatus building, process simplicity, effectiveness of doping, low impurity and higher yield.In this paper, an effort has been made to synthesis Y3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles through simple chemical coprecipitation route using EDTA-ethylenediamine as stabilizing agent. Herein we have reported the optical and photoluminescence characteristics of semiconductor ZnS nanoparticles doped with yttrium ions. In the present work, structural and morphological properties have been studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).


## 2. Experimental Details

### 2.1. Materials

Zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), yttrium nitrate Y(NO3)3·6H2O, sodium sulphide (Na2S·9H2O), EDTA-ethylenediamine, and all chemicals used in this work were of AR grade and used as received without further purification. Ultrafine deionized water was used throughout the experiment.


### 2.2. Nanoparticles Synthesis

Pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles were prepared by chemical coprecipitation method in air atmosphere using EDTA as stabilizing agent. In a typical procedure, 0.5 M zinc nitrate and yttrium nitrate with different concentration (0.025–0.1) in molar ratio were dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water-ethanol (equal volume) and stirred for 10 min at 80°C in a round bottom flask, as a sulfur source 0.5 M Na2S·9H2O was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water-ethanol (equal volume) which was added dropwise to the above solution and stirred for 15 min. As a result the color of the solution changes to white. Then 50 mL of ethanol was added to above solution under stirring followed by the addition of 1 gram EDTA of 10 mL solution drop by drop and the resulted solution was stirred for 2 hours at 80°C. The solution was cooled at room temperature and the resulting precipitate was centrifuged. The obtained dispersions were washed several times by distilled water and alcohol to remove the impurities, including traces of EDTA and the original reactants, if any. Finally the wet precipitate was dried in hot air oven at 80°C for 24 hrs.


### 2.3. Characterization Techniques

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the powder sample were collected on Phillips X’PERT XRD powder diffractometer (Phillips, PW-1800) using a radiation CuKα with 1.54 Å wavelength (40 mA, 45 kV), with 2θ range from 20° to 70°. Structure and surface morphology was studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM-Carl Zeiss, Supra 40VP). The morphology and size of the nanoparticles were studied using transmission electron microscope (TEM), which was performed at 200 keV using JEOL JEM2010. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Shimadzu 8400 S Model) of the powder sample was recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 at room temperature in KBr pellets. After ultrasonification in ethanol the optical absorption spectrum was recorded by UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu-Pharmaspec-1600). The photoluminescence spectrum of the as-prepared sample was obtained over a range 300–800 nm using RF-5301 Fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with a 150 W Xenon lamp as the excitation source. Spectra was recorded using monochromator slit widths of 5.0 nm on both excitation and emission sides. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on Perkin-Elmer TGA7. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a NETZSCH.


## 2.1. Materials

Zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), yttrium nitrate Y(NO3)3·6H2O, sodium sulphide (Na2S·9H2O), EDTA-ethylenediamine, and all chemicals used in this work were of AR grade and used as received without further purification. Ultrafine deionized water was used throughout the experiment.


## 2.2. Nanoparticles Synthesis

Pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles were prepared by chemical coprecipitation method in air atmosphere using EDTA as stabilizing agent. In a typical procedure, 0.5 M zinc nitrate and yttrium nitrate with different concentration (0.025–0.1) in molar ratio were dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water-ethanol (equal volume) and stirred for 10 min at 80°C in a round bottom flask, as a sulfur source 0.5 M Na2S·9H2O was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water-ethanol (equal volume) which was added dropwise to the above solution and stirred for 15 min. As a result the color of the solution changes to white. Then 50 mL of ethanol was added to above solution under stirring followed by the addition of 1 gram EDTA of 10 mL solution drop by drop and the resulted solution was stirred for 2 hours at 80°C. The solution was cooled at room temperature and the resulting precipitate was centrifuged. The obtained dispersions were washed several times by distilled water and alcohol to remove the impurities, including traces of EDTA and the original reactants, if any. Finally the wet precipitate was dried in hot air oven at 80°C for 24 hrs.


## 2.3. Characterization Techniques

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the powder sample were collected on Phillips X’PERT XRD powder diffractometer (Phillips, PW-1800) using a radiation CuKα with 1.54 Å wavelength (40 mA, 45 kV), with 2θ range from 20° to 70°. Structure and surface morphology was studied by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM-Carl Zeiss, Supra 40VP). The morphology and size of the nanoparticles were studied using transmission electron microscope (TEM), which was performed at 200 keV using JEOL JEM2010. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Shimadzu 8400 S Model) of the powder sample was recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 at room temperature in KBr pellets. After ultrasonification in ethanol the optical absorption spectrum was recorded by UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu-Pharmaspec-1600). The photoluminescence spectrum of the as-prepared sample was obtained over a range 300–800 nm using RF-5301 Fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with a 150 W Xenon lamp as the excitation source. Spectra was recorded using monochromator slit widths of 5.0 nm on both excitation and emission sides. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on Perkin-Elmer TGA7. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a NETZSCH.


## 3. Results and Discussion

### 3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Figure1 shows the X-ray diffraction spectra of pure ZnS and Y3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles. The XRD patterns of both undoped and yttrium doped ZnS showed three main diffraction peaks indexed at (111), (220), and (311) which correspond to the planes of cubic zinc blende structure, respectively. These XRD patterns are well matched with the standard JCPDS data (Card no. 80-0020) [18]. Only diffraction peaks of ZnS are present in the XRD patterns due to the small doping amount of Y3+ impurity ions. No reflections related to Y3+ ions and other impurities were identified in the pattern, indicating the high purity of the final product. Due to size effect, the XRD peaks broaden and their widths become larger as the particles become smaller indicating the presence of nanometer regime. The size of the nanocrystals was determined by Debye-Scherer’s equation [19]. From the X-ray line broadening the estimated average sizes of ZnS and Y3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles are around 6.8 and 8.1 nm, respectively. This shows that the doped samples are slightly bigger than that of the undoped sample. For undoped ZnS, the lattice constant has been calculated to be 5.362 Å, which is close to the standard value (5.345 Å) reported in JCPDS file no. 80-0020, whereas, the lattice constant of doped ZnS sample (5.375 Å) is larger than that of the undoped sample. This suggests that the possible substitution of ZnS2+ by Y3+ in the ZnS matrix results in the local distortion and dilation of crystal lattice as the ionic radius of Y3+ ion is 1.04 Å, which is bigger than Zn2+ ions which is 0.74 Å.Figure 1
X-ray diffraction of the pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.


### 3.2. FESEM Analysis

The morphology of the as-prepared pure ZnS and doped metal sulfide nanoparticles was determined by FESEM analysis. Figure2 shows the typical FESEM images of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y samples which are spherical in structure and agglomerated. These micrographs indicate the presence of spherical agglomerates consisting of individual nanoparticles that are approximately in the range of 10–25 nm in size, which are composed of regular shape particles.FESEM image of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


### 3.3. TEM Analysis

We can get direct information about particle size and morphology of the prepared nanocrystalline samples by analyzing TEM micrograph of the samples. However, a typical TEM image of 0.5 M ZnS:Y sample is shown in Figure3. TEM image clearly shows that the yttrium doped zinc sulfide has monodispersed spherical crystallites. The HRTEM image clearly revealed that the synthesized ZnS:Y nanoparticles have particle size of ~4.5 nm as shown in Figure 3, which was corroborated with the XRD results. The nanoparticles are clearly well identified and no effective aggregation of bulk particles was formed. In the HRTEM image, lattice fringes can be clearly observed, which indicates that the particles are crystalline.TEM and HRTEM image of ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


### 3.4. FTIR Spectra Analysis

FTIR spectral measurements have been made in the scan range of 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1. Before FTIR analysis the samples have been thoroughly mixed with KBr and palletized by pressing under a pressure of 10 tons for few minutes under vacuum.FTIR spectra of the as-prepared ZnS:Y one are shown in Figure4; FTIR peaks are assigned to samples at room temperature. IR spectra of the ZnS:Y nanoparticles show a band at 3400 cm−1 attributed to the O–H stretching vibration of water molecules [20]. As seen in our case vibration peak is observed at 1390 cm−1 which may be due to intercalated/adsorbed nitrate ions. Another peak observed at 1590 cm−1 corresponds to the O–H bending of water molecules. Absorption at 1120 cm−1 was assigned to SO4-. Some weak additional bands observed at 924 cm−1 and 826 cm−1 indicate the presence of resonance interaction between vibrational modes of sulphide ions in the crystal [21]. Medium and strong band at 660 cm−1 are assigned to the ZnS band which is corresponding to sulphides [22]. The band at 472.2 cm−1 is assigned to the Y–O [21]. Hence, the existence of above mentioned bands identify the presence of ZnS:Y along with the impurities that the samples consisted of water molecules or hydroxide ions.Figure 4
FTIR spectra of the as-prepared ZnS:Y.


### 3.5. Thermal Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of ZnS:Y nanoparticles was performed on Perkin-Elmer TGA7 at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen flow from room temperature (RT) to 800°C. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a NETZSCH DSC204 in nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C min−1.Figure5 represents the combined plots of TG and DSC. From the TG data, it is noticed that the weight loss of the nanoparticles are found to take place up to 700°C. Figure 5 illustrates TGA curves of pure ZnS:Y nanoparticles at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen atmosphere from 50 to 750°C. Due to strong water absorption of ZnS [23], it adsorbs water from oxygen, which leads to the slight increase of mass at 50°C. There are three obvious weight loss regions up to 800°C. The first weight loss of 8% at around 120°C is due to evaporation of adsorbed moisture on the particles surface [24]. The second stage of weight loss starts at 300°C and can be seen up to 460°C, which represents the evaporation and degradation of sulphuric acid group [25]. Further mass loss has been observed up to 700°C, which inferred that ZnS is oxidized to ZnO [26]. It can be concluded that ZnS particles possess good thermal stability in oxygen. On the DSC curve, the first endothermic peak is found at 60°C, which is attributed to the evaporation of the water. The endothermic peak around 230°C probably corresponds to the evaporation of organic and lattice deformation of ZnS:Y. The composition does not vary in the annealing range from 100°C to 200°C, whereas, beyond 230°C, the doped ions are released from the ZnS matrix. The observed exothermic peak at 310°C is believed to be the beginning of phase transition. A broad endothermic peak at 377°C may be due to decomposition of sulfur and release of doped ions from the ZnS matrix. An exothermic peak is exhibited at 410°C, due to the crystallization of sample. Additionally, above 500°C, there is a smooth downward trend in DSC curve with significant weight loss. This is may be due to release of residual sulfur ions from the sample.Figure 5
DSC and TG curve of ZnS:Y nanoparticles.


### 3.6. Optical Absorption and Optical Band Gap Studies

After the suspension of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles in liquid they were dried for 24 hrs at 80°C; then the sediment was dispersed in ethanol for UV absorption test (Figure6). In our experiment, before the measurement starts ethanol was used as baseline calibration. A part of the sample solution was taken in quartz cuvette for absorption spectrum. The UV-visible absorption spectrums of these samples have been recorded in the range of 200 to 800 nm as shown in Figure 7. The absorption peaks were observed around 322 and 303 nm corresponding to pure ZnS and ZnS:Y3+, respectively. However, the absorption peaks of undoped and Y3+ doped ZnS are considerably blue-shifted compared to that of bulk phase ZnS with absorption 340 nm (3.6 eV). This absorption shift is due to quantum size effect, representing a change in band gap along with excition features, resulting in a more discrete energy spectrum of the individual nanoparticles. The effect of the quantum confinement on impurity depends upon the size of the host crystal [27]. As the size of the host crystal decreases, the degree of confinement and its effect increases [28]. The band gap energy of the nanocrystals was calculated from a simple energy wave equation. E=hc/λ and the determined values are 3.85 and 4.09 eV for undoped and Y3+ doped ZnS, respectively. This result reveals that ZnS:Y has a good absorption for light in the wavelength range of 200–340 nm and also size of the ZnS nanocrystals has been increased on doping.Optical absorption spectra of as-prepared sample pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)Photoluminescence emission spectra of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


### 3.7. Photoluminescence Study on ZnS:Y Nanoparticles

Figure7 shows the room temperature PL spectra of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. From the PL spectra it was observed that pure ZnS nanoparticles showed only the blue self-activated (SA) luminescence emission peaks related with the point defects of the ZnS-host at 408 and 432 nm. These peaks in blue region have been known due to the recombination of the electrons between the sulfur-vacancy-related donor and the valence band [29, 30]. A number of research groups [29–32] have studied the blue emission from ZnS nanoparticles under UV excitation. Usually for semiconductor nanocrystals, two emission peaks are observed which can be attributed to interstitial emission and the other trapped surface states emission, respectively [33]. The exciton emission peak is sharp and the trapped emission is broad [34].Meanwhile, a comparison between the PL spectra of doped and undoped nanoparticles clearly revealed that, for all doped samples, there are three distinct emission bands in their PL spectra which are broad and asymmetric. However, on Y3+ doping blue emission of ZnS has completely quenched and three emission peaks at 363, 469, and 601 nm are generated due to the 5d and 4f transition in Y3+ ions. The third emission peak at about 601 nm could be due to the incorporation of Y3+ ions into the ZnS host lattice. From the PL spectra it is also observed that as the Y3+ concentration increases the peaks were shifted slightly towards higher wavelength side; this is ascribed to the introduction of new occupied states by Y3+ 4f electrons that are located in the band gap of ZnS which causes the lattice distortion and thus influences the energy levels of defect states in ZnS. One more noticeable feature is that the PL intensity of doped ZnS (0.025, 0.05, and 0.1) nanoparticles significantly increases with increase in dopant concentration, which could be due to doping of rare earth ion in the host lattice. As the yttrium ions are incorporated, the intensity of this blue emission decreases and the orange emission comes up, since the energy transfer from ZnS host toward dopant centers is very efficient. With the increase in dopant concentration the orange band increases. In fact, reduction of blue band intensity is observed by varying the dopant concentration, which implies the decrease of the numbers of self-activated (SA) centers related with the ZnS lattice defects that can be related to increased number of dopant ions replacing the Zn ions. These results also demonstrate that dopant in host nanocluster can yield more efficient phosphors. Quenching of the ZnS emission and enhancement of the Y3+ emission demonstrates that ZnS nanocrystals absorbed energy from the excitation source and transferred it nonradiatively to luminescent centers (Y3+) ions. Since the blue emission from ZnS results from recombination in the ZnS the energy transfer will be faster than hole trapping and recombination with electrons, the blue emission from ZnS is quenched and emissions from Y3+ are enhanced. Recently, similar type of quenching was also reported by Shanmugam et al. [35] for Ce3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles, in which the blue emission from ZnS was quenched and emissions from Ce3+ was enhanced. But the difficulty for the successful incorporation of rare earth ions in ZnS crystal lattice is due to the large mismatch in ionic radius and charge imbalance between two ions, that is, Y3+ and Zn2+ ions and higher coordination number of Y3+ in comparison with Zn2+ make the situation energetically unfavorable to replace majority of Zn2+ ions by Y3+ in ZnS lattice, subsequently producing symmetry distortion around Y3+. Recently, Pal et al. [18] reported a study showing that major fraction of Eu3+ ions occupies the Zn sites without inversion symmetry and produces red PL emission. Ashwini et al. [36] reported the PL studies on Eu:ZnS nanoparticles, in which Eu ions exist in Eu2+ state and also stated that in doped nanoparticles a large number of dopant centers are situated near the surface regions than in the interiors and hence are expected to give better emission efficiencies compared to pure ZnS, which is due to a high surface-to-volume ratio based on their small particle size which favors the nucleation of the nanoparticles on the surface rather than interior of the samples. As a result the high surface-to-volume ratio causes the surface states to act as luminescent quenching centers [37]. But in our case the quenching of blue emission peak of ZnS has been observed and the peak intensity is also reduced, which indicated that the yttrium ions do not exist in Y2+ state. And in addition orange-yellow emission has been observed, which indicates the incorporation of Y3+ ions. Also, the literature reveals that Y-doped ZnO exhibits an emission at 598 nm due to defects related to Y elements [38]. According to these studies a part of Y3+ ions will occupy the VZn position to lower the VZn concentration which decreases the intensity of emission peak at 539 nm. These studies also report that Y ions exist in the ZnO lattices with +3 valence and they are apt to take the position of Zn ions which has a +2 valence; Y3+ is inevitable to attract more excess oxygen to be present in the Oi position so that the peak at 598 nm emission will be enhanced. This observation confirms that a part of Y3+ ions will occupy the VZn position at the lattice sites of ZnS, which decreases the intensity of blue emission peaks by lowering the VZn concentration. From these studies we can say that Y ions exist in +3 valence states in ZnS lattices, which is foreseeable to produce the orange emission peak and intensity of these peaks increases with increase in yttrium concentration. There are no reports on PL data of ZnS:Y nanoparticles for comparison. These results provide an experimental method to modify the photoluminescence properties of ZnS by the introduction of yttrium dopants, which is important for both fundamental and applied points of view.


## 3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Figure1 shows the X-ray diffraction spectra of pure ZnS and Y3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles. The XRD patterns of both undoped and yttrium doped ZnS showed three main diffraction peaks indexed at (111), (220), and (311) which correspond to the planes of cubic zinc blende structure, respectively. These XRD patterns are well matched with the standard JCPDS data (Card no. 80-0020) [18]. Only diffraction peaks of ZnS are present in the XRD patterns due to the small doping amount of Y3+ impurity ions. No reflections related to Y3+ ions and other impurities were identified in the pattern, indicating the high purity of the final product. Due to size effect, the XRD peaks broaden and their widths become larger as the particles become smaller indicating the presence of nanometer regime. The size of the nanocrystals was determined by Debye-Scherer’s equation [19]. From the X-ray line broadening the estimated average sizes of ZnS and Y3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles are around 6.8 and 8.1 nm, respectively. This shows that the doped samples are slightly bigger than that of the undoped sample. For undoped ZnS, the lattice constant has been calculated to be 5.362 Å, which is close to the standard value (5.345 Å) reported in JCPDS file no. 80-0020, whereas, the lattice constant of doped ZnS sample (5.375 Å) is larger than that of the undoped sample. This suggests that the possible substitution of ZnS2+ by Y3+ in the ZnS matrix results in the local distortion and dilation of crystal lattice as the ionic radius of Y3+ ion is 1.04 Å, which is bigger than Zn2+ ions which is 0.74 Å.Figure 1
X-ray diffraction of the pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.


## 3.2. FESEM Analysis

The morphology of the as-prepared pure ZnS and doped metal sulfide nanoparticles was determined by FESEM analysis. Figure2 shows the typical FESEM images of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y samples which are spherical in structure and agglomerated. These micrographs indicate the presence of spherical agglomerates consisting of individual nanoparticles that are approximately in the range of 10–25 nm in size, which are composed of regular shape particles.FESEM image of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


## 3.3. TEM Analysis

We can get direct information about particle size and morphology of the prepared nanocrystalline samples by analyzing TEM micrograph of the samples. However, a typical TEM image of 0.5 M ZnS:Y sample is shown in Figure3. TEM image clearly shows that the yttrium doped zinc sulfide has monodispersed spherical crystallites. The HRTEM image clearly revealed that the synthesized ZnS:Y nanoparticles have particle size of ~4.5 nm as shown in Figure 3, which was corroborated with the XRD results. The nanoparticles are clearly well identified and no effective aggregation of bulk particles was formed. In the HRTEM image, lattice fringes can be clearly observed, which indicates that the particles are crystalline.TEM and HRTEM image of ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


## 3.4. FTIR Spectra Analysis

FTIR spectral measurements have been made in the scan range of 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1. Before FTIR analysis the samples have been thoroughly mixed with KBr and palletized by pressing under a pressure of 10 tons for few minutes under vacuum.FTIR spectra of the as-prepared ZnS:Y one are shown in Figure4; FTIR peaks are assigned to samples at room temperature. IR spectra of the ZnS:Y nanoparticles show a band at 3400 cm−1 attributed to the O–H stretching vibration of water molecules [20]. As seen in our case vibration peak is observed at 1390 cm−1 which may be due to intercalated/adsorbed nitrate ions. Another peak observed at 1590 cm−1 corresponds to the O–H bending of water molecules. Absorption at 1120 cm−1 was assigned to SO4-. Some weak additional bands observed at 924 cm−1 and 826 cm−1 indicate the presence of resonance interaction between vibrational modes of sulphide ions in the crystal [21]. Medium and strong band at 660 cm−1 are assigned to the ZnS band which is corresponding to sulphides [22]. The band at 472.2 cm−1 is assigned to the Y–O [21]. Hence, the existence of above mentioned bands identify the presence of ZnS:Y along with the impurities that the samples consisted of water molecules or hydroxide ions.Figure 4
FTIR spectra of the as-prepared ZnS:Y.


## 3.5. Thermal Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of ZnS:Y nanoparticles was performed on Perkin-Elmer TGA7 at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen flow from room temperature (RT) to 800°C. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a NETZSCH DSC204 in nitrogen atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C min−1.Figure5 represents the combined plots of TG and DSC. From the TG data, it is noticed that the weight loss of the nanoparticles are found to take place up to 700°C. Figure 5 illustrates TGA curves of pure ZnS:Y nanoparticles at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 under nitrogen atmosphere from 50 to 750°C. Due to strong water absorption of ZnS [23], it adsorbs water from oxygen, which leads to the slight increase of mass at 50°C. There are three obvious weight loss regions up to 800°C. The first weight loss of 8% at around 120°C is due to evaporation of adsorbed moisture on the particles surface [24]. The second stage of weight loss starts at 300°C and can be seen up to 460°C, which represents the evaporation and degradation of sulphuric acid group [25]. Further mass loss has been observed up to 700°C, which inferred that ZnS is oxidized to ZnO [26]. It can be concluded that ZnS particles possess good thermal stability in oxygen. On the DSC curve, the first endothermic peak is found at 60°C, which is attributed to the evaporation of the water. The endothermic peak around 230°C probably corresponds to the evaporation of organic and lattice deformation of ZnS:Y. The composition does not vary in the annealing range from 100°C to 200°C, whereas, beyond 230°C, the doped ions are released from the ZnS matrix. The observed exothermic peak at 310°C is believed to be the beginning of phase transition. A broad endothermic peak at 377°C may be due to decomposition of sulfur and release of doped ions from the ZnS matrix. An exothermic peak is exhibited at 410°C, due to the crystallization of sample. Additionally, above 500°C, there is a smooth downward trend in DSC curve with significant weight loss. This is may be due to release of residual sulfur ions from the sample.Figure 5
DSC and TG curve of ZnS:Y nanoparticles.


## 3.6. Optical Absorption and Optical Band Gap Studies

After the suspension of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles in liquid they were dried for 24 hrs at 80°C; then the sediment was dispersed in ethanol for UV absorption test (Figure6). In our experiment, before the measurement starts ethanol was used as baseline calibration. A part of the sample solution was taken in quartz cuvette for absorption spectrum. The UV-visible absorption spectrums of these samples have been recorded in the range of 200 to 800 nm as shown in Figure 7. The absorption peaks were observed around 322 and 303 nm corresponding to pure ZnS and ZnS:Y3+, respectively. However, the absorption peaks of undoped and Y3+ doped ZnS are considerably blue-shifted compared to that of bulk phase ZnS with absorption 340 nm (3.6 eV). This absorption shift is due to quantum size effect, representing a change in band gap along with excition features, resulting in a more discrete energy spectrum of the individual nanoparticles. The effect of the quantum confinement on impurity depends upon the size of the host crystal [27]. As the size of the host crystal decreases, the degree of confinement and its effect increases [28]. The band gap energy of the nanocrystals was calculated from a simple energy wave equation. E=hc/λ and the determined values are 3.85 and 4.09 eV for undoped and Y3+ doped ZnS, respectively. This result reveals that ZnS:Y has a good absorption for light in the wavelength range of 200–340 nm and also size of the ZnS nanocrystals has been increased on doping.Optical absorption spectra of as-prepared sample pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)Photoluminescence emission spectra of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y.
(a)
(b)


## 3.7. Photoluminescence Study on ZnS:Y Nanoparticles

Figure7 shows the room temperature PL spectra of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. From the PL spectra it was observed that pure ZnS nanoparticles showed only the blue self-activated (SA) luminescence emission peaks related with the point defects of the ZnS-host at 408 and 432 nm. These peaks in blue region have been known due to the recombination of the electrons between the sulfur-vacancy-related donor and the valence band [29, 30]. A number of research groups [29–32] have studied the blue emission from ZnS nanoparticles under UV excitation. Usually for semiconductor nanocrystals, two emission peaks are observed which can be attributed to interstitial emission and the other trapped surface states emission, respectively [33]. The exciton emission peak is sharp and the trapped emission is broad [34].Meanwhile, a comparison between the PL spectra of doped and undoped nanoparticles clearly revealed that, for all doped samples, there are three distinct emission bands in their PL spectra which are broad and asymmetric. However, on Y3+ doping blue emission of ZnS has completely quenched and three emission peaks at 363, 469, and 601 nm are generated due to the 5d and 4f transition in Y3+ ions. The third emission peak at about 601 nm could be due to the incorporation of Y3+ ions into the ZnS host lattice. From the PL spectra it is also observed that as the Y3+ concentration increases the peaks were shifted slightly towards higher wavelength side; this is ascribed to the introduction of new occupied states by Y3+ 4f electrons that are located in the band gap of ZnS which causes the lattice distortion and thus influences the energy levels of defect states in ZnS. One more noticeable feature is that the PL intensity of doped ZnS (0.025, 0.05, and 0.1) nanoparticles significantly increases with increase in dopant concentration, which could be due to doping of rare earth ion in the host lattice. As the yttrium ions are incorporated, the intensity of this blue emission decreases and the orange emission comes up, since the energy transfer from ZnS host toward dopant centers is very efficient. With the increase in dopant concentration the orange band increases. In fact, reduction of blue band intensity is observed by varying the dopant concentration, which implies the decrease of the numbers of self-activated (SA) centers related with the ZnS lattice defects that can be related to increased number of dopant ions replacing the Zn ions. These results also demonstrate that dopant in host nanocluster can yield more efficient phosphors. Quenching of the ZnS emission and enhancement of the Y3+ emission demonstrates that ZnS nanocrystals absorbed energy from the excitation source and transferred it nonradiatively to luminescent centers (Y3+) ions. Since the blue emission from ZnS results from recombination in the ZnS the energy transfer will be faster than hole trapping and recombination with electrons, the blue emission from ZnS is quenched and emissions from Y3+ are enhanced. Recently, similar type of quenching was also reported by Shanmugam et al. [35] for Ce3+ doped ZnS nanoparticles, in which the blue emission from ZnS was quenched and emissions from Ce3+ was enhanced. But the difficulty for the successful incorporation of rare earth ions in ZnS crystal lattice is due to the large mismatch in ionic radius and charge imbalance between two ions, that is, Y3+ and Zn2+ ions and higher coordination number of Y3+ in comparison with Zn2+ make the situation energetically unfavorable to replace majority of Zn2+ ions by Y3+ in ZnS lattice, subsequently producing symmetry distortion around Y3+. Recently, Pal et al. [18] reported a study showing that major fraction of Eu3+ ions occupies the Zn sites without inversion symmetry and produces red PL emission. Ashwini et al. [36] reported the PL studies on Eu:ZnS nanoparticles, in which Eu ions exist in Eu2+ state and also stated that in doped nanoparticles a large number of dopant centers are situated near the surface regions than in the interiors and hence are expected to give better emission efficiencies compared to pure ZnS, which is due to a high surface-to-volume ratio based on their small particle size which favors the nucleation of the nanoparticles on the surface rather than interior of the samples. As a result the high surface-to-volume ratio causes the surface states to act as luminescent quenching centers [37]. But in our case the quenching of blue emission peak of ZnS has been observed and the peak intensity is also reduced, which indicated that the yttrium ions do not exist in Y2+ state. And in addition orange-yellow emission has been observed, which indicates the incorporation of Y3+ ions. Also, the literature reveals that Y-doped ZnO exhibits an emission at 598 nm due to defects related to Y elements [38]. According to these studies a part of Y3+ ions will occupy the VZn position to lower the VZn concentration which decreases the intensity of emission peak at 539 nm. These studies also report that Y ions exist in the ZnO lattices with +3 valence and they are apt to take the position of Zn ions which has a +2 valence; Y3+ is inevitable to attract more excess oxygen to be present in the Oi position so that the peak at 598 nm emission will be enhanced. This observation confirms that a part of Y3+ ions will occupy the VZn position at the lattice sites of ZnS, which decreases the intensity of blue emission peaks by lowering the VZn concentration. From these studies we can say that Y ions exist in +3 valence states in ZnS lattices, which is foreseeable to produce the orange emission peak and intensity of these peaks increases with increase in yttrium concentration. There are no reports on PL data of ZnS:Y nanoparticles for comparison. These results provide an experimental method to modify the photoluminescence properties of ZnS by the introduction of yttrium dopants, which is important for both fundamental and applied points of view.


## 4. Conclusion

In this paper, we have reported a chemical coprecipitation method for the fabrication of pure ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles using EDTA as a stabilizing agent. It was found that the ZnS and ZnS:Y nanoparticles are highly crystalline and show zincblende structure. The XRD and HRTEM patterns indicated that the growth of the nanoparticles and the sizes of the nanocrystals were found to be ~4.5 nm. UV-Visible absorption spectra showed a strong absorption peak at around 322 nm (3.85 eV) for pure ZnS and 332 nm (3.73 eV) for ZnS:Y, which are considerably blue-shifted compared to that of bulk phase ZnS (3.6 eV). This absorption shift indicated quantum size effect, representing a change in band gap along with edition features. The doping of Y3+ ions has tuned the band gap and photoluminescent properties of ZnS nanocrystallites. Photoluminescence studies showed strong and stable visible-light emissions in the visible spectrum with a broadening in the emission band. Undoped ZnS exhibits an emission maximum at 408 and 432 nm, whereas on doping orange emission band was observed along with the blue emission bands at room temperature. The prepared ZnS:Y3+ sample shows efficient emission of orange light with the peak emission 601 nm with the blue emission suppressed. A strong emission in the orange part of the visible spectrum was possible by doping the yttrium ions with zinc sulphide. The photoluminescence studies illustrated that the doping of Y3+ ions modifies the emission properties of nanocrystalline ZnS with increase in Y3+ ions concentration.



---

*Source: 924797-2014-02-13.xml*